|
Previous: CYGNUS INC /DE/, 424B5, 1999-10-01 |
Next: MERRILL LYNCH MULTI STATE LTD MATURITY MUN SERIES TRUST, 485APOS, 1999-10-01 |
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 1, 1999 Securities Act File No. 33-50417 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549FORM N-1A |
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Pre-Effective Amendment No. Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 and/or REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 Amendment No. 15 |
|X| | | |X| |X| |X| |
(Check appropriate box or boxes)Merrill Lynch Multi-State 800 Scudders Mill Road Terry K. Glenn Copies to: |
Counsel for the Trust BROWN & WOOD LLP One World Trade Center New York, New York 10048-0557 Attention: Thomas R. Smith, Jr., Esq. |
Michael J. Hennewinkel, Esq. MERRILL LYNCH ASSET MANAGEMENT PO Box 9011 Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9011 |
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box): |
| | | immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b) |
| | | on (date) pursuant to paragraph (b) |
|X| | 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
| | | on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
| | | 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) |
| | | on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485. |
If appropriate, check the following box: |
| | | this post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment. |
Title of Securities Being Registered: Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $.10 per share. |
Prospectus[LOGO] Merrill Lynch The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not use this prospectus to sell securities until the registration statement containing this prospectus, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
|
| Merrill Lynch California Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund | |
| Merrill Lynch Florida Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund |
November __, 1999 This Prospectus contains information you should know before investing, including information about risks. Please read it before you invest and keep it for future reference. The Securities and Exchange Commission
has not approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy
of this Prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. Table of Contents |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
[ICON] Key Facts In an effort to help you better understand the many concepts involved in making an investment decision, we have defined highlighted terms in this prospectus in the sidebar. Investment Grade any of the four highest debt obligation ratings by recognized rating agencies, including Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Standard & Poor's or Fitch IBCA, Inc. California Municipal Bond a debt obligation issued by or on behalf of the state of California, a governmental entity in California or other qualifying issuer that pays interest exempt from California income tax as well as from Federal income tax. Florida Municipal Bond a debt obligation issued by or on behalf of the state of Florida, a governmental entity in Florida or other qualifying issuer that is not subject to Florida intangible personal property tax and that pays interest exempt from Federal income tax. |
THE MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST AT A GLANCE What are the Funds' objectives? The investment objective of the California Fund is to provide shareholders with income exempt from Federal and California income taxes. The investment objective of the Florida Fund is to provide shareholders with income exempt from Federal income tax and the opportunity to own shares whose value is exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax. What are the Funds' main investment strategies? The California Fund invests primarily in a portfolio of intermediate term investment grade California municipal bonds. The Florida Fund invests primarily in a portfolio of intermediate term investment grade Florida municipal bonds. These bonds may be obligations of a variety of issuers, including the states of California or Florida, governmental entities in California or Florida, and issuers located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam. The California Fund will invest at least 65% of its assets in California municipal bonds and at least 80% of its total assets in California municipal bonds and other bonds that pay interest exempt from Federal income tax but not California income tax. The Florida Fund will invest at least 65% of its assets in Florida municipal bonds and at least 80% of its total assets in Florida municipal bonds and other bonds that pay interest exempt from Federal income tax but that may be subject to Florida intangible personal property tax. Each Fund may invest up to 20% of its assets in high yield bonds (otherwise known as "junk" bonds). Each Fund also may invest in certain types of derivative securities. When choosing investments, management of the Funds considers various factors, including the credit quality of issuers, yield analysis, maturity analysis and the call features of the obligations. Each Fund will invest primarily in municipal bonds with remaining maturities of between one and ten years. As a result, it is expected that each Fund's average weighted maturity will not be more than five years. Neither Fund can guarantee that it will achieve its objective. What are the main risks of investing in a Fund? As with any fund, the value of each Fund's investments and therefore the value of each Fund's shares may go up or down. These changes may occur in response to interest rate changes or other factors that may affect a particular issuer or obligation. Generally, when interest rates go up, the value of debt instruments like municipal bonds goes down. If the value of a Fund's investments goes down, you may lose money. Prices of shorter term debt instruments generally change less in response to interest rate changes than prices of longer term debt instruments. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 3 |
[ICON] Key Facts |
State Municipal Bond either a California Municipal Bond or a Florida Municipal Bond. |
In addition, since each Fund will invest at least 65% of its assets in its respective State municipal bonds, each Fund is more exposed to negative political or economic factors in its respective state than a fund that invests more widely. Derivatives and high yield bonds may be volatile and subject to liquidity, leverage, credit and other risks. Who should invest? The California Fund may be an appropriate investment for you if you are looking for income that is exempt from Federal and California income taxes. The Florida Fund may be an appropriate investment for you if you are looking for income that is exempt from Federal income taxes and the opportunity to own shares that are not subject to Florida intangible personal property tax. In addition, one of the Funds may be appropriate for you if you: |
| Want a professionally managed portfolio without the administrative burdens of direct investments in municipal bonds | |
| Are looking for liquidity | |
| Can tolerate the risk of loss caused by negative political or economic developments in the relevant state, changes in interest rates or adverse changes in the price of bonds in general |
4 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
The bar charts and tables shown below provide an indication of the risks of investing in each Fund. The bar charts show changes in each Fund's performance for Class B shares for each complete calendar year since the inception of the respective Fund. Sales charges are not reflected in the bar charts. If these amounts were reflected, returns would be less than those shown. The tables compare the average annual total returns for each class of a Fund's shares for the periods shown with those of the ML Municipals Bond (U1AO) 1-3 years Index. How each Fund performed in the past is not necessarily an indication of how that Fund will perform in the future. Merrill Lynch California Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund |
1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.90% | 9.73% | 2.79% |
4.56% |
3.54% |
During the period shown in the bar chart, the highest return for a quarter was 3.70% (quarter ended March 31, 1995) and the lowest return for a quarter was 1.76% (quarter ended March 31, 1994). The California Fund's year-to-date return as of June 30, 1999 was 0.62%. |
Average Annual Total Returns (as of the |
Past |
Past |
Since |
|||
|
||||||
ML CA Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class A |
2.88 |
% |
4.05 |
% |
4.15 |
% |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
4.45 |
% |
4.53 |
%# |
|
||||||
ML CA Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class B |
2.54 |
% |
3.89 |
% |
3.99 |
% |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
4.45 |
% |
4.53 |
%# |
|
||||||
ML CA Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class C |
2.74 |
% |
N/A |
4.86 |
% | |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
N/A |
5.01 |
%## | |
|
||||||
ML CA Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class D |
2.77 |
% |
N/A |
4.73 |
% | |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
N/A |
5.01 |
%## | |
|
* |
Includes sales charge. |
|
** |
This unmanaged index is comprised of AAA-rated bonds maturing within three years. Past performance is not predictive of future performance. |
|
|
Inception date is November 26, 1993. |
|
|
Inception date is October 21, 1994. |
|
# |
Since November 26, 1993. |
|
## |
Since October 21, 1994. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 5 |
|
Merrill Lynch Florida Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund |
1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.37% | 9.30% | 2.33% |
4.19% |
3.70% |
During the period shown in the bar chart, the highest return for a quarter was 3.48% (quarter ended March 31, 1995) and the lowest return for a quarter was 1.46% (quarter ended March 31, 1994). The Florida Fund's year-to-date return as of June 30, 1999 was 1.00%. |
Average Annual Total Returns (as of the |
Past |
Past |
Since |
|||
|
||||||
ML FL Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class A |
3.03 |
% |
3.94 |
% |
3.98 |
% |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
4.45 |
% |
4.53 |
%# |
|
||||||
ML FL Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class B |
2.70 |
% |
3.78 |
% |
3.82 |
% |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
4.45 |
% |
4.53 |
%# |
|
||||||
ML FL Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class C |
2.52 |
% |
N/A |
4.26 |
% | |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
N/A |
5.01 |
%## | |
|
||||||
ML FL Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund* Class D |
2.93 |
% |
N/A |
4.52 |
% | |
ML Municipals Bond (U1A0) 1-3 years Index** |
5.01 |
% |
N/A |
5.01 |
%## | |
|
* |
|
Includes sales charge. |
** |
This unmanaged index is comprised of AAA-rated bonds maturing within three years. Past performance is not predictive of future performance. |
|
|
Inception date is November 26, 1993. |
|
|
Inception date is October 21, 1994. |
|
# |
Since November 26, 1993. |
|
## |
Since October 21, 1994. |
6 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | |
|
UNDERSTANDING Fund investors pay various fees and expenses, either directly or indirectly. Listed below are some of the main types of expenses, which all mutual funds may charge: Expenses paid directly by the shareholder: Shareholder Fees these include sales charges that you may pay when you buy or sell shares of a Fund. Expenses paid indirectly by the shareholder: Annual Fund Operating Expenses expenses that cover the costs of operating a Fund. Management Fee a fee paid to the Manager for managing a Fund. Distribution Fees fees used to support a Fund's marketing and distribution efforts, such as compensating Financial Consultants, advertising and promotion. Service (Account Maintenance) Fees fees used to compensate securities dealers for account maintenance activities. |
Each Fund offers four different classes of shares. Although your money will be invested in a Fund the same way no matter which class of shares you buy, there are differences among the fees and expenses associated with each class. Not everyone is eligible to buy every class. After determining which classes you are eligible to buy, decide which class best suits your needs. Your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant can help you with this decision. This table shows the different fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy and hold the different classes of shares of a Fund. Future expenses may be greater or less than those indicated below.
|
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from |
Both Funds
|
||||||||
Class A |
Class B(b) |
Class C(c) |
Class D |
||||||
|
|||||||||
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on |
|||||||||
1.00 |
%(d) |
None |
None |
1.00 |
%(d) | ||||
|
|||||||||
|
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge
(Load) (as a percentage of original purchase price or redemption proceeds, whichever is lower) |
None |
(e) |
1.00 |
%(d) |
1.00 |
%(d) |
None |
(e) |
|
|||||||||
Sales Charge (Load) imposed on |
|||||||||
None |
None |
None |
None |
||||||
|
|||||||||
Redemption Fee |
None |
None |
None |
None |
|||||
|
|||||||||
Exchange Fee |
None |
None |
None |
None |
|||||
|
|||||||||
Maximum Account Fee |
None |
None |
None |
None |
|||||
|
|||||||||
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
California
Fund
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Management Fee |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% | |
|
|||||||||
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees(g) |
None |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% |
0.10 |
% | ||
|
|||||||||
Other Expenses (including transfer agency fees)(h) |
1.44 |
% |
1.44 |
% |
1.26 |
% |
1.42 |
% | |
|
|||||||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
1.79 |
% |
2.14 |
% |
1.96 |
% |
1.87 |
% | |
|
|||||||||
|
Florida Fund
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Management Fee(f) |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% | |
|
|||||||||
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees(g) |
None |
0.35 |
% |
0.35 |
% |
0.10 |
% | ||
|
|||||||||
Other Expenses (including transfer agency fees)(h) |
1.13 |
% |
1.14 |
% |
0.96 |
% |
1.12 |
% | |
|
|||||||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses(f) |
1.48 |
% |
1.84 |
% |
1.66 |
% |
1.57 |
% | |
|
(a) |
In addition, Merrill Lynch may charge clients a processing fee (currently $5.35) when a client buys or redeems shares. | |
(b) |
Class B shares automatically convert to Class D shares about ten years after you buy them. Then they will no longer be subject to distribution fees and will pay lower account maintenance fees. |
|
(c) |
Class C Shares are available only through the exchange privilege. |
|
(d) |
Some investors may qualify for reductions in the sales charge (load). |
|
(e) |
You may pay a deferred sales charge if you purchase $1 million or more and you redeem within one year. |
|
(f) |
Each Fund pays the Manager a fee at the annual rate of 0.35% of the average daily net assets of the respective Fund. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, the Manager waived $19,537 of the management fees due from the Florida Fund. The Total Fund Operating Expenses in the fee table above have been restated for the Florida Fund to assume the absence of any such waiver because the |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 7 |
|
[ICON] Key Facts
Manager may discontinue or reduce such waiver of fees at any time without notice. The actual Total Fund Operating Expenses for the Florida Fund, net of the waiver, is provided below for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999. | |||||||||||
|
Management Fees Waived
|
Total Operating Expenses
After Waiver
|
|||||||||
Class A |
Class B |
Class C |
Class D |
Class A |
Class B |
Class C |
Class D |
||||
|
Florida Fund |
0.20% |
0.20% |
0.20% |
0.20% |
1.59% |
1.94% |
1.76% |
1.67% |
(g) |
Each Fund calls the "Service Fee" an "Account Maintenance Fee." Account Maintenance Fee is the term used elsewhere in this Prospectus and in all other materials of the Funds. If you hold Class B or Class C shares for a long time, it may cost you more in distribution (12b-1) fees than the maximum sales charge that you would have paid if you had bought Class A or Class D shares. |
|
(h) |
Each Fund pays the Transfer Agent $11.00 for each Class A and Class D shareholder account and $14.00 for each Class B and Class C shareholder account and reimburses the Transfer Agent's out-of-pocket expenses. Each Fund pays a 0.10% fee for certain accounts that participate in the Merrill Lynch Mutual Fund Advisor program. Each Fund also pays a $0.20 monthly closed account charge, which is assessed upon all accounts that close during the year. This fee begins the month following the month the account is closed and ends at the end of the calendar year. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, the California Fund paid the Transfer Agent fees totaling $3,290 and the Florida Fund paid the Transfer Agent fees totaling $4,030. The Manager provides accounting services to each Fund at its cost. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, the California Fund reimbursed the Manager $36,246 and the Florida Fund reimbursed the Manager $42,391 for these accounting services. |
8 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
Examples: These examples are intended to help you compare the cost of investing in each Fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. These examples assume that you invest $10,000 in a Fund
for the time periods indicated, that your investment has a 5% return each
year, that you pay the sales charges, if any, that apply to the particular
class and that each Fund's operating expenses remain the same. This assumption
is not meant to indicate you will receive a 5% annual rate of return.
Your annual return may be more or less than the 5% used in this example.
Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions
your costs would be: |
California Fund
|
||||
EXPENSES IF YOU DID REDEEM YOUR SHARES: |
||||
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
|
|
||||
Class A |
$280 |
$658 |
$1,060 |
$2,184 |
|
||||
Class B |
$317 |
$670 |
$1,149 |
$2,472 |
|
||||
Class C |
$299 |
$615 |
$1,057 |
$2,285 |
|
||||
Class D |
$288 |
$682 |
$1,101 |
$2,268 |
|
||||
EXPENSES IF YOU DID NOT REDEEM YOUR SHARES: |
||||
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
|
|
||||
Class A |
$280 |
$658 |
$1,060 |
$2,184 |
|
||||
Class B |
$217 |
$670 |
$1,149 |
$2,472 |
|
||||
Class C |
$199 |
$615 |
$1,057 |
$2,285 |
|
||||
Class D |
$288 |
$682 |
$1,101 |
$2,268 |
|
||||
Florida Fund |
||||
EXPENSES IF YOU DID REDEEM YOUR SHARES: |
||||
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
|
|
||||
Class A |
$249 |
$563 |
$900 |
$1,851 |
|
||||
Class B |
$287 |
$579 |
$995 |
$2,159 |
|
||||
Class C |
$269 |
$523 |
$902 |
$1,965 |
|
||||
Class D |
$258 |
$591 |
$947 |
$1,949 |
|
||||
EXPENSES IF YOU DID NOT REDEEM YOUR SHARES: |
||||
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
|
|
||||
Class A |
$249 |
$563 |
$900 |
$1,851 |
|
||||
Class B |
$187 |
$579 |
$995 |
$2,159 |
|
||||
Class C |
$169 |
$523 |
$902 |
$1,965 |
|
||||
Class D |
$258 |
$591 |
$947 |
$1,949 |
|
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 9 |
|
[ICON] Details
About the Funds ABOUT THE Edward J. Andrews is the portfolio manager of both Funds and has been a Vice President of Fund Asset Management and Merrill Lynch Asset Management since 1991. ABOUT THE MANAGER Both Funds are managed by Fund Asset Management. |
The California Fund's main goal is to seek income that is exempt from Federal and California income taxes. The Florida Fund's main goal is to seek income exempt from Federal income tax and to offer shareholders the opportunity to own shares whose value is exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax. The California Fund invests primarily in intermediate term, investment grade California municipal bonds while the Florida Fund invests primarily in intermediate term, investment grade Florida municipal bonds. These bonds may be obligations of a variety of issuers including governmental entities or other qualifying issuers. Issuers may be located in California, in the case of the California Fund, or in Florida, in the case of the Florida Fund. Issuers also may be located in other qualifying jurisdictions such as Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands and Guam. Each Fund may invest in either fixed rate or variable rate obligations. At least 80% of each Fund's total assets will be invested in investment grade securities. Each Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in high yield ("junk") bonds. These bonds are generally more speculative and involve greater price fluctuations than investment grade securities. Each Fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in obligations that pay interest exempt from Federal income tax and at least 65% of its total assets in its respective State municipal bonds. Under normal conditions, each Fund's average weighted maturity will not be more than five years. For temporary periods, however, a Fund may invest up to 35% of its total assets in short term tax exempt or taxable money market obligations although, each Fund will not generally invest more than 20% of its net assets in taxable money market obligations. As a temporary measure for defensive purposes, each Fund may invest without limitation in short term tax exempt or taxable money market obligations. These short term investments may limit the potential for each Fund to achieve its objective. Each Fund may use derivatives including futures, options, indexed securities and inverse securities. Derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from another security or an index such as the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index. Each Fund's investments may include private activity bonds that may subject certain shareholders to a Federal alternative minimum tax. California's economy is influenced by numerous factors, including developments in the defense/aerospace, high technology and construction industries and in the government. Florida's economy is also affected by many factors, including its governmental structure, its dependence on sales and use taxes, the disproportionate number of retirees living there and tourism. The |
10 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 11 |
State Specific Risk Each Fund will invest primarily in its respective State municipal bonds. As a result, each Fund is more exposed to risks affecting issuers in its respective state than is a municipal bond fund that invests more widely. Management does not believe that the current economic and financial conditions of either state will adversely affect the respective Fund's ability to invest in high quality state municipal securities. Each Fund is a non-diversified fund, which means that each Fund may invest more of its assets in obligations of a single issuer than if it were a diversified fund. By concentrating in a smaller number of investments, each Fund's risk is increased because each investment has a greater effect on a Fund's performance. |
| California During the late 1990's, California's economy has been recovering from the severe recession it suffered at the beginning of the decade. California's financial condition improved markedly during the fiscal years starting in 1995-96, with a combination of better than expected revenues, slowdown in growth of social welfare programs, and continued spending restraint based on actions taken in earlier years. California's cash position also improved, and no external deficit borrowing occurred over the end of the last four fiscal years. The last borrowing to spread out the repayment of a budget deficit over the end of a fiscal year was $4.0 billion of revenue anticipation warrants issued in July, 1994 and which became due for payment in April, 1996. Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch currently rate the State of California's general obligation bonds Aa3, AA, and AA, respectively. | |
| Florida Many different social, environmental and economic factors may affect the financial condition of Florida and its political subdivisions. From time to time, Florida and its political subdivisions have encountered financial difficulties. Florida is highly dependent upon sales and use taxes, which account for the majority of its General Fund revenues. The Florida Constitution does not permit a state or local personal income tax. The structure of personal income in Florida is also different from the rest of the nation in that the State has a proportionally greater retirement age population that is dependent upon transfer payments (social security, pension |
12 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
benefits, etc.) that can be affected by Federal legislation. Florida's economic growth is also highly dependent upon other factors such as changes in population growth, tourism, interest rates and hurricane activity. The Florida Constitution may limit the State's ability to raise revenues and may have an adverse effect on the State's finances and political subdivisions. As of August 20, 1999, Florida's general obligation bonds were rated Aa2 by Moody's, AA+ by S&P and AA by Fitch. |
Call And Redemption Risk A bond's issuer may call a bond for redemption before it matures. If this happens to a bond a Fund holds, that Fund may lose income and may have to invest the proceeds in bonds with lower yields. Risks associated with certain types of obligations in which each Fund may invest include: General Obligation Bonds The faith, credit and taxing power of the issuer of a general obligation bond secures payment of interest and repayment of principal. Timely payments depend on the issuer's credit quality, ability to raise tax revenues and ability to maintain an adequate tax base. Revenue Bonds Payments of interest and principal on revenue bonds are made only from the revenues generated by a particular facility, class of facilities or the proceeds of a special tax or other revenue source. These payments depend on the money earned by the particular facility or class of facilities. Industrial development bonds are one type of revenue bond. Industrial Development Bonds Municipalities and other public authorities issue industrial development bonds to finance development of industrial facilities for use by a private enterprise. The private enterprise pays the principal and interest on the bond, and the issuer does not pledge its faith, credit and taxing power for repayment. If the private enterprise defaults on its payments, a Fund may not receive any income or get its money back from the investment. Moral Obligation Bonds Moral obligation bonds are generally issued by special purpose public authorities of a state or municipality. If the issuer is unable to meet its obligations, repayment of these bonds becomes a moral commitment, but not a legal obligation, of the state or municipality. Municipal Notes Municipal notes are shorter term municipal debt obligations. They may provide interim financing in anticipation of tax collection, bond sales or revenue receipts. If there is a shortfall in the anticipated proceeds, the notes may not be fully repaid and a Fund may lose money. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 13 |
Insured Municipal Bonds Bonds purchased by a Fund may be covered by insurance that guarantees timely interest payments and payment of principal on maturity. If a bond's insurer fails to fulfill its obligations or loses its credit rating, the value of the bond could drop. Insured bonds are subject to market risk. Junk Bonds Junk bonds are debt securities that are rated below investment grade by the major rating agencies or are unrated securities that Fund management believes are of comparable quality. The Funds do not intend to purchase debt securities that are in default or which Fund management believes will be in default. Although junk bonds generally pay higher rates of interest than investment grade bonds, they are high risk investments that may cause income and principal losses for a Fund. Junk bonds generally are less liquid and experience more price volatility than higher rated debt securities. The issuers of junk bonds may have a larger amount of outstanding debt relative to their assets than issuers of investment grade bonds. In the event of an issuer's bankruptcy, claims of other creditors may have priority over the claims of junk bond holders, leaving few or no assets available to repay junk bond holders. Junk bonds may be subject to greater call and redemption risk than higher rated debt securities. When Issued Securities, Delayed Delivery Securities and Forward Commitments When issued and delayed delivery securities and forward commitments involve the risk that the security a Fund buys will lose value prior to its delivery to that Fund. There also is the risk that the security will not be issued or that the other party will not meet its obligation, in which case a Fund loses the investment opportunity of the assets it has set aside to pay for the security and any gain in the security's price. Variable Rate Demand Obligations Variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs) are floating rate securities that combine an interest in a long term municipal bond with a right to demand payment before maturity from a bank or other financial institution. If the bank or financial institution is unable to pay, a Fund may lose money. |
14 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
Illiquid Investments Each Fund may invest up to 15% of its assets in illiquid securities that it cannot easily resell within seven days at current value or that have contractual or legal restrictions on resale. If a Fund buys illiquid securities it may be unable to quickly resell them or may be able to sell them only at a price below current value. Derivatives Each Fund may use derivative instruments including indexed and inverse securities, options on portfolio positions, options on securities or other financial indices, financial futures and options on such futures. Derivatives allow a Fund to increase or decrease its risk exposure more quickly and efficiently than other types of instruments. Derivatives are volatile and involve significant risks, including:
Each Fund may use derivatives for hedging purposes including anticipatory hedges. Hedging is a strategy in which a Fund uses a derivative to offset the risk that other Fund holdings may decrease in value. While hedging can reduce losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains if the market moves in a different manner than anticipated by a Fund or if the cost of the derivative outweighs the benefit of the hedge. Hedging also involves the risk that changes in the value of the derivative will not match those of the holdings being hedged as expected by a Fund, in which case any losses on the holdings being hedged may not be reduced. There can be no assurance that a Fund's hedging strategy will reduce risk or that hedging transactions will be either available or cost effective. The Funds are not required to use hedging and may choose not to do so. Short Term Municipal Derivatives Short term municipal derivatives present certain unresolved tax, legal, regulatory and accounting issues not |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 15 |
Indexed And Inverse Floating Rate Securities Each Fund may invest in securities whose potential returns are directly related to changes in an underlying index or interest rate, known as indexed securities. The return on indexed securities will rise when the underlying index or interest rate rises and fall when the index or interest rate falls. Each Fund may also invest in securities whose return is inversely related to changes in an interest rate (inverse floaters). In general, income on inverse floaters will decrease when short term rates increase and increase when short term rates decrease. Investments in inverse floaters may subject a Fund to the risks of reduced or eliminated interest payments and losses of principal. In addition, certain indexed securities and inverse floaters may increase or decrease in value at a greater rate than the underlying interest rate, which effectively leverages a Fund's investment. As a result, the market value of such securities will generally be more volatile than that of fixed rate, tax exempt securities. Both indexed securities and inverse floaters are derivative securities and can be considered speculative. Borrowing And Leverage Each Fund may borrow for temporary emergency purposes including to meet redemptions. Borrowing may exaggerate changes in the net asset value of Fund shares and in the yield on the Fund's portfolio. Borrowing will cost a Fund interest expense and other fees. The costs of borrowing may reduce a Fund's return. Certain securities that a Fund buys may create leverage including, for example, when issued securities, forward commitments and options.
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION If you would like further information about the Trust and each Fund, including how the Funds invest, please see the Statement of Additional Information. |
16 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
[ICON] Your Account MERRILL LYNCH SELECT PRICINGSM SYSTEM Each Fund offers four share classes, each with its own sales charge and expense structure, allowing you to invest in the way that best suits your needs. Each share class represents an ownership interest in the same investment portfolio. When you choose your class of shares you should consider the size of your investment and how long you plan to hold your shares. Your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant can help you determine which share class is best suited to your personal financial goals. For example, if you select Class A or D shares, you generally pay a sales charge at the time of purchase. If you buy Class D shares, you also pay an ongoing account maintenance fee of 0.10%. You may be eligible for a sales charge reduction or waiver. If you select Class B or C shares, you will invest the full amount of your purchase price, but you will be subject to a distribution fee of 0.20% and an account maintenance fee of 0.15%. Because these fees are paid out of a Fund's assets on an ongoing basis, over time these fees increase the cost of your investment and may cost you more than paying an initial sales charge. In addition, you may be subject to a deferred sales charge when you sell Class B or C shares. You may acquire Class C shares only by exchanging Class C shares of another Merrill Lynch mutual fund. Each Fund's shares are distributed by Merrill Lynch Funds Distributor, a division of Princeton Funds Distributor, Inc., an affiliate of Merrill Lynch. Each Fund is a separate series of the Merrill Lynch Multi-State Limited Maturity Municipal Series Trust. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 17 |
|
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||
Availability |
Limited to certain investors including: |
Generally available through Merrill Lynch. Limited availability through other securities dealers. |
Not available for |
Generally available through Merrill Lynch. Limited availability through other securities dealers. | |||
|
|||||||
Initial Sales Charge? |
Yes. Payable at time of purchase. Lower sales charges available for larger investments. | No. Entire purchase price is invested in shares of the Fund. | No. Entire purchase price is invested in shares of the Fund. | Yes. Payable at time of purchase. Lower sales charges available for larger investments. | |||
|
|||||||
Deferred Sales Charge? |
No. (May be charged for purchases over $1 million that are redeemed within one year.) | Yes. Payable if you redeem within one year of purchase. | Yes. Payable if you redeem within one year of acquisition.. | No. (May be charged for purchases over $1 million that are redeemed within one year.) | |||
|
|||||||
Account Maintenance and Distribution Fees? |
No. | 0.15% Account Maintenance Fee. 0.20% Distribution Fee. | 0.15% Account Maintenance Fee. 0.20% Distribution Fee. | 0.10% Account Maintenance Fee. No Distribution Fee. |
|||
|
|||||||
Conversion to Class D shares? | No. | Yes, automatically after approximately ten years. | No. | No. | |||
|
18 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
Right of Accumulation permits you to pay the sales charge that would apply to the cost or value (whichever is higher) of all shares you own in the Merrill Lynch mutual funds that offer Select Pricing options. Letter of Intent permits you to pay the sales charge that would be applicable if you add up all shares of Merrill Lynch Select Pricing System funds that you agree to buy within a 13 month period. Certain restrictions apply. |
Class A and Class D Shares Initial Sales Charge Options If you select Class A or Class D shares, you will pay a sales charge at the time of purchase. |
Amount of Purchase |
Sales Load |
Sales Load as |
Discount to |
||||
|
|||||||
Less than $100,000 |
1.00 |
% |
1.01 |
% |
.95 |
% | |
|
|||||||
$100,000 but less |
|||||||
.75 |
% |
.76 |
% |
.70 |
% | ||
|
|||||||
$250,000 but less |
|||||||
.50 |
% |
.50 |
% |
.45 |
% | ||
|
|||||||
$500,000 but less |
|||||||
.30 |
% |
.30 |
% |
.27 |
% | ||
|
|||||||
$1,000,000 and over** |
.00 |
% |
.00 |
% |
.00 |
% | |
|
* |
Rounded to the nearest one-hundredth percent. |
|
** |
If you invest $1,000,000 or more in Class A or Class D shares, you may not pay an initial sales charge. However, if you redeem your shares within one year after purchase, you may be charged a deferred sales charge. This charge is 0.20% of the lesser of the original cost of the shares being redeemed or your redemption proceeds. |
No initial sales charge applies to Class A or Class D shares that you buy through reinvestment of dividends. A reduced or waived sales charge on a purchase of Class A or Class D shares may apply for:
|
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 19 |
|
Only certain investors are eligible to buy Class A shares. Your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant can help you determine whether you are eligible to buy Class A shares or to participate in any of these programs. If you decide to buy shares under the initial sales charge alternative and you are eligible to buy both Class A and Class D shares, you should buy Class A since Class D shares are subject to a 0.10% account maintenance fee, while Class A shares are not. If you redeem Class A or Class D shares and within 30 days buy new shares of the same class, you will not pay a sales charge on the new purchase amount. The amount eligible for this "Reinstatement Privilege" may not exceed the amount of your redemption proceeds. To exercise the privilege, contact your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant or the Funds' Transfer Agent at 1-800-MER-FUND. Class B and Class C Shares Deferred Sales Charge Options If you select Class B or Class C shares, you do not pay an initial sales charge at the time of acquisition. However, if you redeem your shares within one year after acquisition, you may be required to pay a deferred sales charge. You will also pay distribution fees of 0.20% and account maintenance fees of 0.15% each year under distribution plans that each Fund has adopted under Rule 12b-1. Because these fees are paid out of a Fund's assets on an ongoing basis, over time these fees increase the cost of your investment and may cost you more than paying an initial sales charge. The Distributor uses the money that it receives from the deferred sales charges and the distribution fees to cover the costs of marketing, advertising and compensating the Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant or other securities dealer who assists you in purchasing Fund shares. |
20 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
If you redeem Class B shares or Class C shares within one year after acquisition, you may be charged a deferred sales charge. The amount of the charge is set forth in the following schedule: |
Years Since Purchase | Sales Charge* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
0 - 1 | 1.00% | ||||
|
|||||
1 and thereafter | 0.00% | ||||
|
* | The percentage charge will apply to the lesser of the original cost of the shares being redeemed or the proceeds of your redemption. Shares acquired through reinvestment of dividends are not subject to a deferred sales charge. Not all Merrill Lynch funds have identical deferred sales charge schedules. If you exchange your shares for shares of another fund, the higher charge will apply. |
Class B Shares The deferred sales charge relating to Class B shares may be reduced or waived in certain circumstances, such as:
Your Class B shares convert automatically into Class D shares approximately ten years after purchase. Any Class B shares received through reinvestment of dividends paid on converting shares will also convert at that time. Class D shares are subject to lower annual expenses than Class B shares. The conversion of Class B to Class D shares is not a taxable event for Federal income tax purposes. Different conversion schedules apply to Class B shares of different Merrill Lynch mutual funds. For example, Class B shares of a fixed-income fund typically convert approximately ten years after purchase compared to approximately eight years for equity funds. If you acquire your Class B |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 21 |
|
22 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
If You Want to | Your Choices | Information Important for You to Know | |
Buy Shares | First, select the share class appropriate for you | Refer to the Merrill Lynch Select Pricing table on page 18. Be sure to read this prospectus carefully. | |
Next, determine the amount of your investment |
The minimum initial investment for the Fund is $1,000 for all accounts except that certain Merrill Lynch fee-based programs have a $250 initial minimum investment. (The minimums for initial investments may be waived under certain circumstances.) |
||
Have your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant or securities dealer submit your purchase order |
The price of your shares is based on the next calculation of net asset value after your order is placed. Any purchase orders placed prior to the close of business on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) will be priced at the net asset value determined that day. Purchase orders placed after that time will be priced at the net asset value determined on the next business day. Each Fund may reject any order to buy shares and may suspend the sale of shares at any time. Merrill Lynch may charge a processing fee to confirm a purchase. This fee is currently $5.35. |
||
Or contact the Transfer Agent |
To purchase shares directly, call the Transfer Agent at 1-800-MER-FUND and request a purchase application. Mail the completed purchase application to the Transfer Agent at the address on the inside back cover of this Prospectus. | ||
Add to Your Investment |
Purchase additional shares |
The minimum investment for additional purchases is generally $50 except that certain programs, such as automatic investment plans, may have higher minimums. (The minimum for additional purchases may be waived under certain circumstances.) |
|
Acquire additional shares through the automatic dividend reinvestment plan | All dividends are automatically reinvested without a sales charge. | ||
Participate in the automatic investment plan | You may invest a specific amount on a periodic basis through certain Merrill Lynch investment or central asset accounts. | ||
Transfer Shares to Another Securities Dealer |
Transfer to a participating securities dealer |
You may transfer your Fund shares only to another securities dealer that has entered into an agreement with Merrill Lynch. Certain shareholder services may not be available for the transferred shares. You may only purchase additional shares of funds previously owned before the transfer. All future trading of these assets must be coordinated by the receiving firm. | |
Transfer to a non-participating securities dealer |
You must either: Transfer your shares to an account with the Transfer Agent; or Sell your shares, paying any applicable CDSC. |
||
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 23 |
[ICON] Your Account |
If You Want to | Your Choices | Information Important for You to Know | |
Sell Your Shares | Have your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant or securities dealer submit your sales order |
The price of your shares is based on the next calculation of net asset value after your order is placed. For your redemption request to be priced at the net asset value on the day of your request, you must submit your request to your dealer prior to that day's close of business on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time). Any redemption request placed after that time will be priced at the net asset value at the close of business on the next business day. Dealers must submit redemption requests to the Fund not more than thirty minutes after the close of business on the New York Stock Exchange on the day the request was received. Securities dealers, including Merrill Lynch, may charge a fee to process a redemption of shares. Merrill Lynch currently charges a fee of $5.35. No processing fee is charged if you redeem shares directly through the Transfer Agent. A Fund may reject an order to sell shares under certain
|
|
Sell through the Transfer Agent |
You may sell shares held at the Transfer Agent by writing
to the Transfer Agent at the address on the inside back cover of this
prospectus. All shareholders on the account must sign the letter. In some
cases, a signature guarantee may be required. Please see the Statement
of Additional Information for details on when a signature guarantee is
needed. If you hold stock certificates, return the certificates with the
letter. The Transfer Agent will If you hold share certificates, they must be delivered to the Transfer Agent before they can be converted. Check with the Transfer Agent or your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant for details. |
||
Sell Shares Systematically | Participate in a Fund's Systematic Withdrawal Plan |
You can choose to receive systematic payments from your Fund account either by check or through direct deposit to your bank account on a monthly or quarterly basis. If you hold your Fund shares in a Merrill Lynch CMA® or CBA® Account you can arrange for systematic redemptions of a fixed dollar amount on a monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annual or annual basis, subject to certain conditions. Under either method you must have dividends automatically reinvested. For Class B and C shares your total annual withdrawals cannot be more than 10% per year of the value of your shares at the time your plan is established. The deferred sales charge is waived for systematic redemptions. Ask your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant for details. |
|
24 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
If You Want to | Your Choices | Information Important for You to Know | |
Exchange Your Shares |
Select the fund into which you want to exchange. Be sure to read that fund's prospectus |
You can exchange your shares of a Fund for shares of many other Merrill Lynch mutual funds. You must have held the shares used in the exchange for at least 15 calendar days before you can exchange to another fund. Each class of Fund shares is generally exchangeable for shares of the same class of another fund. If you own Class A shares and wish to exchange into a fund in which you have no Class A shares (and are not eligible to purchase Class A shares), you will exchange into Class D shares. Some of the Merrill Lynch mutual funds impose a different initial or deferred sales charge schedule. If you exchange Class A or D shares for shares of a fund with a higher initial sales charge than you originally paid, you will be charged the difference at the time of exchange. If you exchange Class B shares for shares of a fund with a different deferred sales charge schedule, the higher schedule will apply. The time you hold Class B or C shares in both funds will count when determining your holding period for calculating a deferred sales charge at redemption. If you exchange Class A or D shares for money market fund shares, you will receive Class A shares of Summit Cash Reserves Fund. Class B or C shares of a Fund will be exchanged for Class B shares of Summit. Although there is currently no limit on the number of exchanges that you can make, the exchange privilege may be modified or terminated at any time in the future. |
|
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 25 |
[ICON] Your Account |
Net Asset Value the market value of a Fund's total assets after deducting liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding. |
HOW SHARES ARE PRICED When you buy shares, you pay the net asset value, plus any applicable sales charge. This is the offering price. Shares are also redeemed at their net asset value, minus any applicable deferred sales charge. Each Fund calculates its net asset value (generally by using market quotations) each day the New York Stock Exchange is open, after the close of business on the Exchange (the Exchange generally closes at 4:00 p.m. Eastern time). The net asset value used in determining your price is the next one calculated after your purchase or redemption order is placed. Generally, Class A shares will have the highest net asset value because that class has the lowest expenses, and Class D shares will have a higher net asset value than Class B or Class C shares. Also dividends paid on Class A and Class D shares will generally be higher than dividends paid on Class B and Class C shares because Class A and Class D shares have lower expenses. PARTICIPATION IN MERRILL LYNCH FEE-BASED PROGRAMS If you participate in certain fee-based programs offered by Merrill Lynch, you may be able to buy Class A shares at net asset value, including by exchanges from other share classes. Sales charges on the shares being exchanged may be reduced or waived under certain circumstances. You generally cannot transfer shares held through a fee-based program into another account. Instead, you will have to redeem your shares held through the program and purchase shares of another class, which may be subject to distribution and account maintenance fees. This may be a taxable event and you will pay any applicable sales charges. If you leave one of these programs, your shares may be redeemed or automatically exchanged into another class of Fund shares or into a money market fund. The class you receive may be the class you originally owned when you entered the program, or in certain cases, a different class. If the exchange is into Class B shares, the period before conversion to Class D shares may be modified. Any redemption or exchange will be at net asset value. However, if you participate in the program for less than a specified period, you may be charged a fee in accordance with the terms of the program. |
26 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
|
Dividends exempt-interest, ordinary income
and capital gains paid to shareholders. Dividends may be reinvested in
additional Fund shares as they |
Details about these features and the relevant charges are included in the client agreement for each fee-based program and are available from your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant. DIVIDENDS AND TAXES Each Fund will distribute any net investment income monthly and any net realized long or short term capital gains at least annually. Each Fund may also pay a special distribution at the end of the calendar year to comply with Federal tax requirements. If your account is with Merrill Lynch and you would like to receive dividends in cash, contact your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant. If your account is with the Transfer Agent and you would like to receive dividends in cash, contact the Transfer Agent. Taxes To the extent that the dividends distributed by a Fund are from municipal bond interest income, they are exempt from Federal income tax. However, certain investors may be subject to a Federal alternative minimum tax on dividends received from a Fund. Interest income from other investments may produce taxable distributions. Generally, to the extent that the dividends distributed by the California Fund are derived from California municipal bond interest income, they are also exempt from California income taxes. Dividends derived from capital gains realized by the California Fund will be subject to Federal income tax and generally will be subject to California income tax as well. If you are subject to income tax in a state other than California, the dividends derived from California municipal bonds will not be exempt from income tax in that state. The value of your Florida Fund shares generally will be exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax. While dividends paid by the Florida Fund to individuals who are Florida residents are not subject to personal income taxation, distributions by the Florida Fund will be subject to Florida corporate income taxes. If you are subject to income tax in a state other than Florida, the dividends derived from Florida municipal bonds may be subject to income tax in that state. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 27 |
|
[ICON] Your Account
"BUYING A DIVIDEND" |
Generally, within 60 days after the end of each Fund's taxable year, the Trust will tell you the amount of exempt-interest dividends and capital gain dividends you received that year. Capital gain dividends are taxable as long term capital gains to you, regardless of how long you have held your shares. The tax treatment of dividends from a Fund is the same whether you choose to receive dividends in cash or to have them reinvested in shares of a Fund. By law, each Fund must withhold 31% of your distributions and proceeds if you have not provided a taxpayer identification number or social security number or if the number you have provided is incorrect. If you redeem shares of a Fund or exchange them for shares of another fund, any gain on the transaction may be subject to Federal income tax. This section summarizes some of the consequences of an investment in a Fund under current Federal and California and Florida tax laws. It is not a substitute for personal tax advice. Consult your personal tax adviser about the potential tax consequences to you of an investment in a Fund under all applicable tax laws. The Trust's Statement of Additional Information has more information about taxes. |
28 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
Fund Asset Management, the Fund's Manager, manages the Funds' investments and their business operations under the overall supervision of the Trust's Board of Trustees. The Manager has the responsibility for making all investment decisions for each Fund. Each Fund pays the Manager a fee at the annual rate of 0.35% of the average daily net assets of that Fund. Fund Asset Management is part of the Asset Management Group of ML & Co. The Asset Management Group had approximately $520 billion in investment company and other portfolio assets under management as of August 1999. This amount includes assets managed for Merrill Lynch affiliates. A Note About Year 2000 Many computer systems were designed using only two digits to designate years. These systems may not be able to distinguish the Year 2000 from the Year 1900 (commonly known as the "Year 2000 Problem"). A Fund could be adversely affected if the computer systems used by Fund management or other service providers to that Fund do not properly address this problem before January 1, 2000. Fund management expects to have addressed this problem before then and does not anticipate that the services it provides will be adversely affected. The Funds' other service providers have told Fund management that they also expect to resolve the Year 2000 Problem, and Fund management will continue to monitor the situation as the Year 2000 approaches. However, if the problem has not been fully addressed, one or both Funds could be negatively affected. The Year 2000 Problem could also have a negative impact on the issuers of securities in which a Fund invests, and this could hurt a Fund's investment returns. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 29 |
[ICON] Management of the Funds The Financial Highlights tables are intended to help you understand each Fund's financial performance for the periods shown. Certain information reflects financial results for a single share of each of the Funds. The total returns in the table represent the rate an investor would have earned on an investment in each Fund (assuming reinvestment of all dividends). This information has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, whose report, along with the Trust's financial statements, is included in the Trust's annual report to shareholders, which is available upon request. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
California Fund
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Class A
|
Class B
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Increase |
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1995 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1995 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
$ |
$10.22 |
$10.05 |
$ 9.99 |
$ 9.88 |
$ |
$10.21 |
$10.04 |
$ 9.99 |
$ 9.88 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
.39 |
.38 |
.39 |
.42 |
.35 |
.34 |
.36 |
.39 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(.09 |
) |
.17 |
.06 |
.11 |
(.09 |
) |
.17 |
.05 |
.11 |
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
.30 |
.55 |
.45 |
.53 |
.26 |
.51 |
.41 |
.50 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
(.39 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.39 |
) |
(.42 |
) |
(.35 |
) |
(.34 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.39 |
) | |||||||
Realized gain on investments net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
(.39 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.39 |
) |
(.42 |
) |
(.35 |
) |
(.34 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.39 |
) | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of year |
$ |
$10.13 |
$10.22 |
$10.05 |
$ 9.99 |
$ |
$10.12 |
$10.21 |
$10.04 |
$ 9.99 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return:* |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on net asset value per share |
|
% |
2.96 |
% |
5.57 |
% |
4.56 |
% |
5.60 |
% |
|
% |
2.59 |
% |
5.20 |
% |
4.08 |
% |
5.23 |
% | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses, net of reimbursement |
|
% |
1.12 |
% |
1.08 |
% |
.94 |
% |
.40 |
% |
|
% |
1.51 |
% |
1.44 |
% |
1.30 |
% |
.76 |
% | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
|
% |
1.32 |
% |
1.28 |
% |
1.30 |
% |
1.44 |
% |
|
% |
1.71 |
% |
1.64 |
% |
1.66 |
% |
1.80 |
% | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
|
% |
3.82 |
% |
3.75 |
% |
3.89 |
% |
4.36 |
% |
|
% |
3.45 |
% |
3.39 |
% |
3.53 |
% |
4.00 |
% | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) |
$ |
$1,460 |
$3,152 |
$3,162 |
$3,527 |
$ |
$4,812 |
$6,877 |
$9,919 |
$10,363 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
% |
24.65 |
% |
26.86 |
% |
11.09 |
% |
124.72 |
% |
|
% |
24.65 |
% |
26.86 |
% |
11.09 |
% |
124.72 |
% | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
* Total investment returns exclude the effects of sales loads. |
30 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (concluded) |
California Fund |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C |
Class D
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) |
For the Year Ended July 31, |
For the Period October |
For the Year Ended July 31, |
For the Period October |
|||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
$ |
$10.22 |
$10.05 |
$ 9.99 |
$9.76 |
$ |
$10.22 |
$10.05 |
$ 9.99 |
$ 9.76 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
.37 |
.36 |
.37 |
.31 |
.38 |
.37 |
.38 |
.33 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(.10 |
) |
.17 |
.06 |
.23 |
|
(.09 |
) |
.17 |
.06 |
.23 |
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
.27 |
.53 |
.43 |
.54 |
.29 |
.54 |
.44 |
.56 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
(.37 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.31 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.33 |
) | |||||||
Realized gain on investments net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
(.37 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.31 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.33 |
) | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
$ |
$10.12 |
$10.22 |
$10.05 |
$9.99 |
$ |
$10.13 |
$10.22 |
$10.05 |
$ 9.99 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return:** |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on net asset value per share |
% |
2.68 |
% |
5.39 |
% |
4.35 |
% |
5.60 |
%# |
|
% |
2.86 |
% |
5.47 |
% |
4.46 |
% |
5.85 |
%# | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses, net of reimbursement |
% |
1.36 |
% |
1.25 |
% |
1.14 |
% |
.82 |
%* |
|
% |
1.25 |
% |
1.15 |
% |
1.06 |
% |
.66 |
%* | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
% |
1.56 |
% |
1.45 |
% |
1.50 |
% |
1.98 |
%* |
|
% |
1.45 |
% |
1.35 |
% |
1.40 |
% |
1.81 |
%* | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
% |
3.61 |
% |
3.58 |
% |
3.69 |
% |
4.04 |
%* |
|
% |
3.70 |
% |
3.69 |
% |
3.77 |
% |
4.28 |
%* | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$ |
$ 95 |
$ 57 |
$ 55 |
$ 64 |
$ |
$2,713 |
$4,043 |
$2,185 |
$1,771 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
% |
24.65 |
% |
26.86 |
% |
11.09 |
% |
124.72 |
% |
|
% |
24.65 |
% |
26.86 |
% |
11.09 |
% |
124.72 |
% | |||
|
* | Annualized. | |
** | Total investment returns exclude the effects of sales loads. | |
| Commencement of operations. | |
# | Aggregate total investment return. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 31 |
[ICON] Management of the Funds
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (concluded) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Florida Fund
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Class A
|
Class B
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Increase |
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1995 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1995 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
$ |
$10.07 |
$ 9.96 |
$10.02 |
$ 9.87 |
$ |
$10.07 |
$ 9.96 |
$ 10.02 |
$ 9.88 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
.38 |
.40 |
.40 |
.43 |
.35 |
.36 |
.37 |
.40 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
investments net
|
(.07 |
) |
.11 |
(.06 |
) |
.15 |
(.07 |
) |
.11 |
(.06 |
) |
.14 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
.31 |
.51 |
.34 |
.58 |
.28 |
.47 |
.31 |
.54 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
(.38 |
) |
(.40 |
) |
(.40 |
) |
(.43 |
) |
(.35 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.40 |
) | |||||||
Realized gain on investments net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
(.38 |
) |
(.40 |
) |
(.40 |
) |
(.43 |
) |
(.35 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.40 |
) | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of year |
$ |
$ 10.00 |
$10.07 |
$ 9.96 |
$10.02 |
$ |
$10.00 |
$ 10.07 |
$ 9.96 |
$ 10.02 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return:* |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on net asset value per share |
% |
3.17 |
% |
5.20 |
% |
3.45 |
% |
6.05 |
% |
|
% |
2.80 |
% |
4.83 |
% |
3.08 |
% |
5.57 |
% | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses, net of reimbursement |
% |
1.19 |
% |
1.09 |
% |
.89 |
% |
.39 |
% |
% |
1.54 |
% |
1.45 |
% |
1.24 |
% |
.75 |
% | |||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
% |
1.19 |
% |
1.09 |
% |
.97 |
% |
1.03 |
% |
% |
1.54 |
% |
1.45 |
% |
1.32 |
% |
1.38 |
% | |||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
% |
3.81 |
% |
3.98 |
% |
4.01 |
% |
4.39 |
% |
% |
3.46 |
% |
3.63 |
% |
3.66 |
% |
4.05 |
% | |||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) |
$ |
$5,331 |
$6,376 |
$7,874 |
$9,849 |
$ |
$8,014 |
$11,461 |
$13,690 |
$16,213 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
% |
39.52 |
% |
35.67 |
% |
39.90 |
% |
138.97 |
% |
|
% |
39.52 |
% |
35.67 |
% |
39.90 |
% |
138.97 |
% | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
* Total investment returns exclude the effects of sales loads. |
32 | MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (concluded) |
Florida Fund |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C |
Class D
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) |
For the Year Ended July 31, |
For the |
For the Year Ended July 31, |
For the |
|||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
$ |
$10.00 |
$ 9.90 |
$10.01 |
$ 9.76 |
$ |
$10.06 |
$ 9.95 |
$10.01 |
$ 9.76 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
.33 |
.38 |
.36 |
.29 |
.37 |
.39 |
.39 |
.33 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
investments net
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(.07 |
) |
.10 |
(.11 |
) |
.25 |
|
(.06 |
) |
.11 |
(.06 |
) |
.25 |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
.26 |
.48 |
.25 |
.54 |
.31 |
.50 |
.33 |
.58 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
(.33 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.29 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.39 |
) |
(.39 |
) |
(.33 |
) | |||||||
Realized gain on investments net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
(.33 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
(.36 |
) |
(.29 |
) |
(.37 |
) |
(.39 |
) |
(.39 |
) |
(.33 |
) | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
$ |
$ 9.93 |
$10.00 |
$ 9.90 |
$10.01 |
$ |
$10.00 |
$10.06 |
$ 9.95 |
$10.01 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return:** |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on net asset value per share |
% |
2.65 |
% |
4.93 |
% |
2.48 |
% |
5.65 |
% # |
|
% |
3.17 |
% |
5.10 |
% |
3.35 |
% |
6.07 |
% # | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses, net of reimbursement |
% |
1.29 |
% |
1.26 |
% |
1.21 |
% |
1.09 |
%* |
|
% |
1.29 |
% |
1.19 |
% |
.99 |
% |
.67 |
% * | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
% |
1.29 |
% |
1.26 |
% |
1.23 |
% |
1.67 |
%* |
|
% |
1.29 |
% |
1.19 |
% |
1.07 |
% |
1.19 |
% * | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income net |
|
% |
3.78 |
% |
3.83 |
% |
3.75 |
% |
3.83 |
%* |
|
% |
3.71 |
% |
3.88 |
% |
3.91 |
% |
4.23 |
%* | |||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$ |
$ 1 |
$ 60 |
$ 52 |
$ 1 |
$ |
$5,362 |
$7,733 |
$6,406 |
$7,210 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
% |
39.52 |
% |
35.67 |
% |
39.90 |
% |
138.97 |
% |
|
% |
39.52 |
% |
35.67 |
% |
39.90 |
% |
138.97 |
% | |||
|
* | Annualized. | |
** | Total investment returns exclude the effects of sales loads. | |
| Commencement of operations. | |
# | Aggregate total investment return. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | 33 |
(This page intentionally left blank) |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
(This page intentionally left blank) |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST | ||
|
[1] |
POTENTIAL INVESTORS Open an account (two options) |
[2] |
MERRILL LYNCH FINANCIAL CONSULTANT OR SECURITIES DEALER Advises shareholders on their Fund investments. |
TRANSFER AGENT Financial Data Services, Inc. PO Box 45289 Jacksonville, Florida 32232-5289 Performs recordkeeping and reporting services. |
|
DISTRIBUTOR Merrill Lynch Funds Distributor, a division of Princeton Funds Distributor, Inc. PO Box 9081 Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9081 Arranges for the sale of Fund shares. |
||
COUNSEL Brown & Wood LLP One World Trade Center New York, New York 10048-0557 Provides legal advice to each Fund. |
THE FUND The Board of Trustees oversees each Fund. |
CUSTODIAN State Street Bank and Trust Company PO Box 351 Boston, Massachusetts 02101 Holds each Fund's assets for safekeeping. |
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Deloitte & Touche LLP 117 Campus Drive Princeton, New Jersey 08540-6400 Audits the financial statements of each Fund on behalf of the shareholders. |
MANAGER Fund Asset Management, L.P. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 800 Scudders Mill Road Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536 MAILING ADDRESS PO Box 9011 Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9011 TELEPHONE NUMBER 1-800-MER-FUND Manages each Fund's day-to-day activities. |
MERRILL LYNCH MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST |
[ICON] For More Information Additional information about each Fund's investments is available in the Trust's annual and semiannual reports to shareholders. In the Trust's annual report you will find a discussion of the market conditions and investment strategies that significantly affected each Fund's performance during its last fiscal year. You may obtain these reports at no cost by calling 1-800-MER-FUND. The Trust will send you one copy of each shareholder report and certain other mailings, regardless of the number of Fund accounts you have. To receive separate shareholder reports for each account, call your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant or write to the Transfer Agent at its mailing address. Include your name, address, tax identification number and Merrill Lynch brokerage or mutual fund account number. If you have any questions, please call your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant or the Transfer Agent at 1-800-MER-FUND. Statement of Additional Information The Trust's Statement of Additional Information contains further information about each Fund and is incorporated by reference (legally considered to be part of this prospectus). You may request a free copy by writing the Trust at Financial Data Services, Inc., PO Box 45289, Jacksonville, Florida 32232-5289 or by calling 1-800-MER-FUND. Contact your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant or the Trust at the telephone number or address indicated above if you have any questions. Information about each Fund (including the Statement of Additional Information) can be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room. This information is also available on the SEC's Internet site at http://www.sec.gov and copies may be obtained upon payment of a duplicating fee by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, DC 20549-6009. You should rely only on the information contained in this Prospectus. No one is authorized to provide you with information that is different from information contained in this Prospectus. Investment Company Act file #811-6282 Prospectus[LOGO] Merrill Lynch |
Merrill Lynch Multi-State Limited Maturity Municipal Series Trust California Florida |
November __, 1999 |
The information in this statement of additional information is not complete and may be changed. This statement of additional information is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
Merrill Lynch Multi-State Limited Maturity
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
generally depends on the revenues of a private entity and be aware of the risks that such an investment may entail. Continued ability of an entity to generate sufficient revenues for the payment of principal and interest on such bonds will be affected by many factors including the size of the entity, capital structure, demand for its products or services, competition, general economic conditions, government regulation and the entitys dependence on revenues for the operation of the particular facility being financed. Moral Obligation Bonds. Each Fund also may invest in moral obligation bonds, which are normally issued by special purpose public authorities. If an issuer of moral obligation bonds is unable to meet its obligations, the repayment of such bonds becomes a moral commitment but not a legal obligation of the state or municipality in question. Municipal Notes. Municipal notes are shorter term municipal debt obligations. They may provide interim financing in anticipation of tax collection, bond sales or revenue receipts. If there is a shortfall in the anticipated proceeds, the note may not be fully repaid and a Fund may lose money. Municipal Commercial Paper. Municipal commercial paper is generally unsecured and issued to meet short-term financing needs. The lack of security presents some risk of loss to a Fund. Municipal Lease Obligations. Also included within the general category of Municipal Bonds are participation certificates issued by government authorities or entities to finance the acquisition or construction of equipment, land and/or facilities. The certificates represent participations in a lease, an installment purchase contract or a conditional sales contract (hereinafter collectively called lease obligations) relating to such equipment, land or facilities. Although lease obligations do not constitute general obligations of the issuer for which the issuers unlimited taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is frequently backed by the issuers covenant to budget for, appropriate and make the payments due under the lease obligation. However, certain lease obligations contain non-appropriation clauses which provide that the issuer has no obligation to make lease or installment purchase payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis. Although non-appropriation lease obligations are secured by the leased property, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure might prove difficult. These securities represent a type of financing that has not yet developed the depth of marketability associated with more conventional securities. Certain investments in lease obligations may be illiquid. Each Fund may not invest in illiquid lease obligations if such investments, together with all other illiquid investments, would exceed 15% of that Funds total assets. Each Fund may, however, invest without regard to such limitation in lease obligations which the Manager, pursuant to guidelines which have been adopted by the Board of Trustees and subject to the supervision of the Board, determines to be liquid. The Manager will deem lease obligations to be liquid if they are publicly offered and have received an investment grade rating of Baa or better by Moodys, or BBB or better by S&P or Fitch. Unrated lease obligations, or those rated below investment grade, will be considered liquid if the obligations come to the market through an underwritten public offering and at least two dealers are willing to give competitive bids. In reference to the latter, the Manager must, among other things, also review the creditworthiness of the entity obligated to make payment under the lease obligation and make certain specified determinations based on such factors as the existence of a rating or credit enhancement such as insurance, the frequency of trades or quotes for the obligation and the willingness of dealers to make a market in the obligation. Synthetic Short-Term Municipal Bonds. Each Fund may invest in a variety of synthetic short-term municipal bonds (Synthetic Bonds). Synthetic Bonds are typically structured by a bank, broker-dealer or other financial institution, and generally consist of a trust or partnership through which a Fund holds an interest in one or more long-term municipal bonds that are assets of the applicable entity (Underlying Bonds) coupled with a conditional right to sell (put) that Funds interest in the Underlying Bonds at par plus accrued interest to a financial institution (a Liquidity Provider). Typically, a Synthetic Bond is structured as a trust or partnership that provides for pass-through tax-exempt income. There are currently three principal types of Synthetic Bond structures: (1) Tender Option Bonds, which are instruments that grant the holder thereof the right to put an Underlying Bond at par plus accrued interest at specified intervals to a Liquidity Provider; (2) Swap Products, in which the trust or partnership swaps the payments due on an Underlying Bond with a swap counterparty who agrees to pay a floating municipal money market interest rate; and (3) Partnerships, which allocate to the partners income, expenses, capital gains and losses in accordance with a governing partnership agreement. Each of the Funds may also invest in other forms of Synthetic Bonds. |
5 |
Investments in Synthetic Bonds raise certain tax, legal, regulatory and accounting issues that may not be presented by investments in other Municipal Bonds. There is some risk that certain issues could be resolved in a manner that could adversely impact the performance of the Funds. For example, the tax-exempt treatment of the interest paid to holders of Synthetic Bonds is premised on the legal conclusion that the holders of such Synthetic Bonds have an ownership interest in the Underlying Bonds. While the Fund receives an opinion of legal counsel to the effect that the income from each Synthetic Bond is tax-exempt to the same extent as the Underlying Bond, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) has not issued a ruling on this subject. Were the IRS to issue an adverse ruling, there is a risk that the interest paid on such Synthetic Bonds would be deemed taxable. A Synthetic Bond with a put notice period exceeding seven days will be subject to each Funds restriction on illiquid investments unless, in the judgment of the Trustees, such Synthetic Bond is liquid. Indexed and Inverse Floating Obligations. Each Fund may invest in its respective State Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds (and Non-Municipal Tax-Exempt Securities) yielding a return that is based on a particular index of value or interest rates. For example, each Fund may invest in its respective State Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds that pay interest based on an index of Municipal Bond interest rates. The principal amount payable upon maturity of certain State Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds also may be based on the value of the index. To the extent a Fund invests in these types of State Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds, the Funds return on such State Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds will be subject to risk with respect to the value of the particular index. Interest and principal payable on the State Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds may also be based on relative changes among particular indices. Also, each Fund may invest in so-called inverse floating obligations or residual interest bonds on which the interest rates typically vary inversely with a short-term floating rate (which may be reset periodically by a dutch auction, a remarketing agent, or by reference to a short-term tax-exempt interest rate index). Each Fund may purchase synthetically-created inverse floating rate bonds evidenced by custodial or trust receipts. Generally, income on inverse floating rate bonds will decrease when short-term interest rates increase, and will increase when short-term interest rates decrease. Such securities have the effect of providing a degree of investment leverage, since they may increase or decrease in value in response to changes, as an illustration, in market interest rates at a rate which is a multiple (typically two) of the rate at which fixed-rate long-term tax-exempt securities increase or decrease in response to such changes. As a result, the market values of such securities will generally be more volatile than the market values of fixed-rate tax-exempt securities. To seek to limit the volatility of these securities, each Fund may purchase inverse floating obligations with shorter-term maturities or which contain limitations on the extent to which the interest rate may vary. Certain investments in such obligations may be illiquid. Each Fund may not invest in such illiquid obligations if such investments, together with other illiquid investments, would exceed 15% of that Funds total assets. The Manager, however, believes that indexed and inverse floating obligations represent flexible portfolio management instruments for the Funds which allow the Funds to seek potential investment rewards, hedge other portfolio positions or vary the degree of investment leverage relatively efficiently under different market conditions. When Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions. Each Fund may purchase or sell securities that it is entitled to receive on a when issued basis. Each Fund may also purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery basis. Each Fund may also purchase or sell securities through a forward commitment. These transactions involve the purchase or sale of securities by a Fund at an established price with payment and delivery taking place in the future. A Fund enters into these transactions to obtain what is considered an advantageous price to that Fund at the time of entering into the transaction. Neither Fund has established any limit on the percentage of its assets that may be committed in connection with these transactions. When a Fund purchases securities in these transactions, it segregates liquid securities in an amount equal to the amount of its purchase commitments. There can be no assurance that a security purchased on a when issued basis will be issued or that a security purchased or sold through a forward commitment will be delivered. The value of securities in these transactions on the delivery date may be more or less than a Funds purchase price. Each Fund bears the risk of a decline in the value of the security in these transactions and may not benefit from an appreciation in the value of the security during the commitment period. Call and Redemption Risk. Each Fund may purchase a Municipal Bond issuers right to call all or a portion of such Municipal Bond for mandatory tender for purchase (a Call Right). A holder of a Call Right may exercise such right to require a mandatory tender for the purchase of related Municipal Bonds, subject to certain |
6 |
7 |
Funds shares will fluctuate. There can be no assurance that either Funds hedging transactions will be effective. Furthermore, a Fund may only engage in hedging activities from time to time and may not necessarily be engaging in hedging activities when movements in interest rates occur. The Funds have no obligation to enter into hedging transactions and may choose not to do so. Each Fund is authorized to purchase and sell certain exchange traded financial futures contracts (financial futures contracts) solely for the purpose of hedging its investments in Municipal Bonds against declines in value and to hedge against increases in the cost of securities it intends to purchase. However, any transactions involving financial futures or options (including puts and calls associated therewith) will be in accordance with each Funds investment policies and limitations. A financial futures contract obligates the seller of a contract to deliver and the purchaser of a contract to take delivery of the type of financial instrument covered by the contract, or in the case of index-based futures contracts to make and accept a cash settlement, at a specific future time for a specified price. To hedge its portfolio, the Fund may take an investment position in a futures contract which will move in the opposite direction from the portfolio position being hedged. A sale of financial futures contracts may provide a hedge against a decline in the value of portfolio securities because such depreciation may be offset, in whole or in part, by an increase in the value of the position in the financial futures contracts. A purchase of financial futures contracts may provide a hedge against an increase in the cost of securities intended to be purchased because such appreciation may be offset, in whole or in part, by an increase in the value of the position in the futures contracts. Certain Federal income tax requirements may limit a Funds ability to engage in hedging transactions. Distributions, if any, of net long-term capital gains from certain transactions in futures or options are taxable at long-term capital gains rates for Federal income tax purposes. See Dividends and Taxes Taxes and Tax Treatment of Options and Futures Transactions. Futures Contracts. A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a security or, in the case of an index-based futures contract, to make and accept a cash settlement for a set price on a future date. A majority of transactions in futures contracts, however, do not result in the actual delivery of the underlying instrument or cash settlement, but are settled through liquidation, (i.e., by entering into an offsetting transaction. Futures contracts have been designed by boards of trade which have been designated contracts markets by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)). The purchase or sale of a futures contract differs from the purchase or sale of a security in that no price or premium is paid or received. Instead, an amount of cash or securities acceptable to the broker and the relevant contract market, which varies, but is generally about 5% of the contract amount, must be deposited with the broker. This amount is known as initial margin and represents a good faith deposit assuring the performance of both the purchaser and seller under the futures contract. Subsequent payments to and from the broker, called variation margin, are required to be made on a daily basis as the price of the futures contract fluctuates making the long and short positions in the futures contract more or less valuable, a process known as marking to the market. At any time prior to the settlement date of the futures contract, the position may be closed out by taking an opposite position that will operate to terminate the position in the futures contract. A final determination of variation margin is then made, additional cash is required to be paid to or released by the broker and the purchaser realizes a loss or gain. In addition, a nominal commission is paid on each completed sale transaction. Each Fund deals in financial futures contracts based on a long-term municipal bond index developed by the Chicago Board of Trade (CBT) and The Bond Buyer (the Municipal Bond Index). The Municipal Bond Index is comprised of 40 tax-exempt municipal revenue and general obligation bonds. Each bond included in the Municipal Bond Index must be rated A or higher by Moodys or S&P and must have a remaining maturity of 19 years or more. Twice a month new issues satisfying the eligibility requirements are added to, and an equal number of old issues are deleted from, the Municipal Bond Index. The value of the Municipal Bond Index is computed daily according to a formula based on the price of each bond in the Municipal Bond Index, as evaluated by six dealer-to-dealer brokers. The Municipal Bond Index futures contract is traded only on the CBT. Like other contract markets, the CBT assures performance under futures contracts through a clearing corporation, a nonprofit organization managed by the exchange membership which is also responsible for handling daily accounting of deposits or withdrawals of margin. |
8 |
Each Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts on U.S. Government securities as a hedge against adverse changes in interest rates as described below. With respect to U.S. Government securities, currently there are financial futures contracts based on long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, Treasury notes, Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) Certificates and three-month U.S. Treasury bills. Each Fund may purchase and write call and put options on futures contracts on U.S. Government securities and purchase and sell Municipal Bond index futures contracts in connection with its hedging strategies. Subject to policies adopted by the Trustees, each Fund also may engage in other futures contracts transactions such as futures contracts on other municipal bond indices that may become available if the Manager and the Trustees of the Trust should determine that there is normally a sufficient correlation between the prices of such futures contracts and the Municipal Bonds in which a Fund invests to make such hedging appropriate. Futures Strategies. Each Fund may sell a financial futures contract (i.e., assume a short position) in anticipation of a decline in the value of its investments in Municipal Bonds resulting from an increase in interest rates or otherwise. The risk of decline could be reduced without employing futures as a hedge by selling such Municipal Bonds and either reinvesting the proceeds in securities with shorter maturities or by holding assets in cash. This strategy, however, entails increased transaction costs in the form of dealer spreads and typically would reduce the average yield of a Funds portfolio securities as a result of the shortening of maturities. The sale of futures contracts provides an alternative means of hedging against declines in the value of its investments in Municipal Bonds. As such values decline, the value of a Funds positions in the futures contracts will tend to increase, thus offsetting all or a portion of the depreciation in the market value of that Funds Municipal Bond investments that are being hedged. While a Fund will incur commission expenses in selling and closing out futures positions, commissions on futures transactions are lower than transaction costs incurred in the purchase and sale of Municipal Bonds. In addition, the ability of a Fund to trade in the standardized contracts available in the futures markets may offer a more effective defensive position than a program to reduce the average maturity of the portfolio securities due to the unique and varied credit and technical characteristics of the municipal debt instruments available to that Fund. Employing futures as a hedge also may permit a Fund to assume a defensive posture without reducing the yield on its investments beyond any amounts required to engage in futures trading. When a Fund intends to purchase Municipal Bonds, it may purchase futures contracts as a hedge against any increase in the cost of such Municipal Bonds resulting from a decrease in interest rates or otherwise, that may occur before such purchases can be effected. Subject to the degree correlation between the Municipal Bonds and the futures contracts, subsequent increases in the cost of Municipal Bonds should be reflected in the value of the futures held by a Fund. As such purchases are made, an equivalent amount of futures contracts will be closed out. Due to changing market conditions and interest rate forecasts, however, a futures position may be terminated without a corresponding purchase of portfolio securities. Call Options on Futures Contracts. Each Fund may also purchase and sell exchange traded call and put options on financial futures contracts on U.S. Government securities. The purchase of a call option on a futures contract is analogous to the purchase of a call option on an individual security. Depending on the pricing of the option compared to either the futures contract upon which it is based or the price of the underlying debt securities, it may or may not be less risky than ownership of the futures contract or underlying debt securities. Like the purchase of a futures contract, a Fund will purchase a call option on a futures contract to hedge against a market advance when that Fund is not fully invested. The writing of a call option on a futures contract constitutes a partial hedge against declining prices of the securities which are deliverable upon exercise of the futures contract. If the futures price at expiration is below the exercise price, a Fund will retain the full amount of the option premium which provides a partial hedge against any decline that may have occurred in the Funds portfolio holdings. Put Options on Futures Contracts. The purchase of a put option on a futures contract is analogous to the purchase of a protective put option on portfolio securities. A Fund will purchase a put option on a futures contract to hedge that Funds portfolio against the risk of rising interest rates. The writing of a put option on a futures contract constitutes a partial hedge against increasing prices of the securities which are deliverable upon exercise of the futures contract. If the futures price at expiration is higher than the exercise price, a Fund will retain the full amount of the option premium which provides a partial hedge against any increase in the price of Municipal Bonds which that Fund intends to purchase. |
9 |
The writer of an option on a futures contract is required to deposit initial and variation margin pursuant to requirements similar to those applicable to futures contracts. Premiums received from the writing of an option will be included in initial margin. The writing of an option on a futures contract involves risks similar to those relating to futures contracts. The Trust has received an order from the Commission exempting it from the provisions of Section 17(f) and Section 18(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Investment Company Act), in connection with its strategy of investing in futures contracts. Section 17(f) relates to the custody of securities and other assets of an investment company and may be deemed to prohibit certain arrangements between the Fund and commodities brokers with respect to initial and variation margin. Section 18(f) of the Investment Company Act prohibits an open-end investment company such as the Trust from issuing a senior security other than a borrowing from a bank. The staff of the Commission has in the past indicated that a futures contract may be a senior security under the Investment Company Act. Restrictions on Use of Futures Transactions. Regulations of the CFTC applicable to each Fund require that all of the futures transactions of each Fund constitute bona fide hedging transactions and that each Fund purchase and sell futures contracts and options thereon (i) for bona fide hedging purposes, and (ii) for non-hedging purposes, if the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish positions in such contracts and options does not exceed 5% of the liquidation value of a Funds portfolio assets after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such contracts and options. (However, each Fund intends to engage in options and futures transactions only for hedging purposes.) Margin deposits may consist of cash or securities acceptable to the broker and the relevant contract market. When a Fund purchases a futures contract, or writes a put option or purchases a call option thereon, it will maintain an amount of cash, cash equivalents (e.g., high grade commercial paper and daily tender adjustable notes) or liquid securities in a segregated account with that Funds custodian, so that the amount so segregated plus the amount of initial and variation margin held in the account of its broker equals the market value of the futures contracts, thereby ensuring that the use of such futures contract is unleveraged. It is not anticipated that transactions in futures contracts will have the effect of increasing portfolio turnover. Risk Factors in Futures Transactions and Options. Investment in futures contracts involves the risk of imperfect correlation between movements in the price of the futures contract and the price of the security being hedged. The hedge will not be fully effective when there is imperfect correlation between the movements in the prices of two financial instruments. For example, if the price of the futures contract moves more than the price of the hedged security, a Fund will experience either a loss or gain on the futures contract which is not completely offset by movements in the price of the hedged securities. To compensate for imperfect correlations, each Fund may purchase or sell futures contracts in a greater dollar amount than the hedged securities if the volatility of the hedged securities is historically greater than the volatility of the futures contracts. Conversely, each Fund may purchase or sell fewer futures contracts if the volatility of the price of the hedged securities is historically less than that of the futures contracts. The particular municipal bonds comprising the index underlying the Municipal Bond Index financial futures contract may vary from the bonds held by each Fund. As a result, each Funds ability to hedge effectively all or a portion of the value of its Municipal Bonds through the use of such financial futures contracts will depend in part on the degree to which price movements in the index underlying the financial futures contract correlate with the price movements of the Municipal Bonds held by the respective Fund. The correlation may be affected by disparities in the average maturity, ratings, geographical mix or structure of each Funds investments as compared to those comprising the Municipal Bond Index and general economic or political factors. In addition, the correlation between movements in the value of the Municipal Bond Index may be subject to change over time as additions to and deletions from the Municipal Bond Index alter its structure. The correlation between futures contracts on U.S. Government securities and the Municipal Bonds held by each Fund may be adversely affected by similar factors and the risk of imperfect correlation between movements in the prices of such futures contracts and the prices of Municipal Bonds held by each Fund may be greater. Municipal Bond Index futures contracts were approved for trading in 1986. Trading in such futures contracts may tend to be less liquid than trading in other futures contracts. The trading of futures contracts also is subject to certain market risks, such as inadequate trading activity, which could at times make it difficult or impossible to liquidate existing positions. |
10 |
11 |
unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest upon a short notice period not to exceed seven days. There is, however, the possibility that because of default or insolvency the demand feature of VRDOs and Participating VRDOs may not be honored. The interest rates are adjustable at intervals (ranging from daily to up to one year) to some prevailing market rate for similar investments, such adjustment formula being calculated to maintain the market value of the VRDOs, at approximately the par value of the VRDOs on the adjustment date. The adjustments typically are based upon the Public Securities Association Index or some other appropriate interest rate adjustment index. Each Fund may invest in all types of tax-exempt instruments currently outstanding or to be issued in the future which satisfy the short-term maturity and quality standards of each Fund. Participating VRDOs provide a Fund with a specified undivided interest (up to 100%) of the underlying obligation and the right to demand payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest on the Participating VRDOs from the financial institution upon a specified number of days notice, not to exceed seven days. In addition, the Participating VRDO is backed by an irrevocable letter of credit or guaranty of the financial institution. A Fund would have an undivided interest in the underlying obligation and thus participate on the same basis as the financial institution in such obligation except that the financial institution typically retains fees out of the interest paid on the obligation for servicing the obligation, providing the letter of credit and issuing the repurchase commitment. The Trust has been advised by its counsel that the Funds should be entitled to treat the income received on Participating VRDOs as interest from tax-exempt obligations. VRDOs that contain a right of demand to receive payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest on a notice period exceeding seven days may be deemed to be illiquid securities. A VRDO with a demand notice period exceeding seven days will therefore be subject to each Funds restriction on illiquid investments unless, in the judgment of the Trustees, such VRDO is liquid. The Trustees may adopt guidelines and delegate to the Manager the daily function of determining and monitoring liquidity of such VRDOs. The Trustees, however, will retain sufficient oversight and will be ultimately responsible for such determinations. The Temporary Investments, VRDOs and Participating VRDOs in which each Fund may invest will be in the following rating categories at the time of purchase: MIG-1/VMIG-1 through MIG-3/VMIG-3 for notes and VRDOs and Prime-1 through Prime-3 for commercial paper (as determined by Moodys), SP-1 through SP-2 for notes and A-1 through A-3 for VRDOs and commercial paper (as determined by S&P),or F-1 through F-3 for notes, VRDOs and commercial paper (as determined by Fitch). Temporary Investments, if not rated, must be of comparable quality in the opinion of the Manager. In addition, each Fund reserves the right to invest temporarily a greater portion of its assets in Temporary Investments for defensive purposes, when, in the judgment of the Manager, market conditions warrant. Repurchase Agreements. Each Fund may invest in securities pursuant to repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements may be entered into only with a member bank of the Federal Reserve System or primary dealer or an affiliate thereof, in U.S. Government securities. Under such agreements, the bank or primary dealer or an affiliate thereof agrees, upon entering into the contract, to repurchase the security at a mutually agreed upon time and price, thereby determining the yield during the term of the agreement. This results in a fixed rate of return insulated from market fluctuations during such period. In repurchase agreements, the prices at which the trades are conducted do not reflect accrued interest on the underlying obligations. Such agreements usually cover short periods, such as under one week. Repurchase agreements may be construed to be collateralized loans by the purchaser to the seller secured by the securities transferred to the purchaser. In a repurchase agreement, each Fund will require the seller to provide additional collateral if the market value of the securities falls below the repurchase price at any time during the term of the repurchase agreement. In the event of default by the seller under a repurchase agreement construed to be a collateralized loan, the underlying securities are not owned by a Fund but only constitute collateral for the sellers obligation to pay the repurchase price. Therefore, a Fund may suffer time delays and incur costs or possible losses in connection with the disposition of the collateral. In the event of a default under such a repurchase agreement, instead of the contractual fixed rate of return, the rate of return to a Fund shall be dependent upon intervening fluctuations of the market value of such security and the accrued interest on the security. In such event, a Fund would have rights against the seller for breach of contract with respect to any losses arising from market fluctuations following the failure of the seller to perform. Each Fund may not invest in repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days if such investments, together with all other illiquid investments, would exceed 15% of that Funds net assets. |
12 |
In general, for Federal income tax purposes, repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized loans secured by the securities sold. Therefore, amounts earned under such agreements will not be considered tax-exempt interest. The treatment of purchase and sales contracts is less certain. Suitability. The economic benefit of an investment in a Fund depends upon many factors beyond the control of the Funds, the Manager and its affiliates.Because of the emphasis of each Fund on its respective State Municipal Bonds, each Fund should be considered a vehicle for diversification and not as a balanced investment program. The suitability for any particular investor of a purchase of shares in either Fund will depend upon, among other things, such investors tax status, investment objectives and ability to accept the risks associated with investing in Municipal Bonds and each Funds respective State Municipal Bonds. In addition, investors in the California Fund must be prepared to accept the risk of loss of principal and the risk of receiving income that is not exempt from Federal and California income taxes; investors in the Florida Fund must be prepared to accept the risk of loss of principal, the risk of receiving income that is not exempt from Federal income tax and the risk that the value of Florida Fund shares will not be exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax. The Trust has adopted a number of fundamental and non-fundamental restrictions and policies relating to the investment of the assets of each Fund and its activities. The fundamental policies of each Fund set forth below may not be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority of such Funds outstanding voting securities (which for this purpose and under the Investment Company Act means the lesser of (i) 67% of a Funds shares present at a meeting at which more than 50% of the outstanding shares of that Fund are represented or (ii) more than 50% of such Funds outstanding shares). Neither Fund may: |
(1) Invest more than 25% of its assets, taken at market value, in the securities of issuers in any particular industry (excluding the U.S. Government and its agencies and instrumentalities). For purposes of this restriction, states, municipalities and their political subdivisions are not considered part of any industry. |
|
(2) Make investments for the purpose of exercising control or management. |
|
(3) Purchase or sell real estate, except that, to the extent permitted by applicable law, a Fund may invest in securities directly or indirectly secured by real estate or interests therein or issued by companies which invest in real estate or interests therein. |
|
(4) Make loans to other persons, except that the acquisition of bonds, debentures or other corporate debt securities and investment in government obligations, commercial paper, pass-through instruments, certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances, repurchase agreements or any similar instruments shall not be deemed to be the making of a loan, and except further that a Fund may lend its portfolio securities, provided that the lending of portfolio securities may be made only in accordance with applicable law and the guidelines set forth in the Trusts Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, as they may be amended from time to time. |
|
(5) Issue senior securities to the extent such issuance would violate applicable law. |
|
(6) Borrow money, except that (i) a Fund may borrow from banks (as defined in the Investment Company Act) in amounts up to 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed), (ii) a Fund may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, borrow up to an additional 5% of its total assets for temporary purposes, (iii) a Fund may obtain such short-term credit as may be necessary for the clearance of purchases and sales of portfolio securities and (iv) a Fund may purchase securities on margin to the extent permitted by applicable law. A Fund may not pledge its assets other than to secure such borrowings or, to the extent permitted by the Trusts investment policies as set forth in its Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, as they may be amended from time to time, in connection with hedging transactions, short sales, when-issued and forward commitment transactions and similar investment strategies. |
|
(7) Underwrite securities of other issuers, except insofar as a Fund technically may be deemed an underwriter under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), in selling portfolio securities. |
|
(8) Purchase or sell commodities or contracts on commodities, except to the extent that a Fund may do so in accordance with applicable law and the Trusts Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, as they may be amended from time to time, and without registering as a commodity pool operator under the Commodity Exchange Act. |
13 |
Under the non-fundamental investment restrictions, which may be changed by the Board of Trustees without shareholder approval, neither Fund may: |
(a) Purchase securities of other investment companies, except to the extent such purchases are permitted by applicable law. As a matter of policy, however, a Fund will not purchase shares of any registered open-end investment company or registered unit investment trust, in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F) or (G) (the fund of funds provisions) of the Investment Company Act, at any time the Funds shares are owned by another investment company that is part of the same group of investment companies as the Fund. |
(b) Make short sales of securities or maintain a short position, except to the extent permitted by applicable law. Neither Fund currently intends to engage in short sales, except short sales against the box. |
(c) Invest in securities which cannot be readily resold because of legal or contractual restrictions or which cannot otherwise be marketed, redeemed or put to the issuer or a third party, if at the time of acquisition more than 15% of its total assets would be invested in such securities. This restriction shall not apply to securities which mature within seven days or securities which the Board of Trustees of the Trust has otherwise determined to be liquid pursuant to applicable law. |
(d) Notwithstanding fundamental investment restriction (6) above, borrow amounts in excess of 20% of its total assets taken at market value (including the amount borrowed), and then only from banks as a temporary measure for extraordinary or emergency purposes. In addition, neither Fund will purchase securities while borrowings are outstanding. |
Each Funds investments will be limited so as to qualify as a regulated investment company for purposes of the Code. See Dividends and Taxes Federal Taxes. To qualify, among other requirements, the Trust will limit each Funds investments so that, at the close of each quarter of the taxable year, (i) not more than 25% of the market value of a Funds total assets will be invested in the securities of a single issuer, and (ii) with respect to 50% of the market value of its total assets, not more than 5% of the market value of its total assets will be invested in the securities of a single issuer and a Fund will not own more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of a single issuer. For purposes of this restriction, each Fund will regard each state and each political subdivision, agency or instrumentality of such state and each multi-state agency of which such state is a member and each public authority which issues securities on behalf of a private entity as a separate issuer, except that if the security is backed only by the assets and revenues of a non-government entity then the entity with the ultimate responsibility for the payment of interest and principal may be regarded as the sole issuer. These tax-related limitations may be changed by the Trustees of the Trust to the extent necessary to comply with changes to the Federal tax requirements. Because of the affiliation of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated (Merrill Lynch) with the Manager, each Fund is prohibited from engaging in certain transactions involving Merrill Lynch or its affiliates except pursuant to an exemptive order under the Investment Company Act. See Portfolio Transactions. Without such an exemptive order each Fund would be prohibited from engaging in portfolio transactions with Merrill Lynch or any of its affiliates acting as principal. The Manager will effect portfolio transactions without regard to the time the securities have been held, if, in its judgment, such transactions are advisable in light of a change in circumstances of a particular issuer or in general market, financial or economic conditions. As a result of its investment policies, each Fund may engage in a substantial number of portfolio transactions and a Funds portfolio turnover rate may vary greatly from year to year or during periods within a year.The portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of a Funds annual sales or purchases of portfolio securities (exclusive of purchases or sales of securities whose maturities at the time of acquisition were one year or less) by the monthly average value of the securities in the portfolio during the year. A high portfolio turnover may result in negative tax consequences, such as an increase in capital gain dividends or in ordinary income dividends of accrued market discount. See Dividends and Taxes Taxes. High portfolio turnover may also involve correspondingly greater transaction costs in the form of dealer spreads and brokerage commissions, which are borne directly by each Fund. |
14 |
The Trustees of the Trust consist of seven individuals, five of whom are not interested persons of the Trust as defined in the Investment Company Act (the non-interested Trustees). The Trustees are responsible for the overall supervision of the operations of the Trust and perform the various duties imposed on the directors or Trustees of investment companies by the Investment Company Act. Information about the Trustees, executive officers of the Trust and the portfolio manager of the Funds, including their ages and their principal occupations for at least the last five years, is set forth below. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each Trustee, executive officer and the portfolio manager is P.O. Box 9011, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9011. Terry K. Glenn (59) President and Trustee (1)(2) Executive Vice President of the Manager and Merrill Lynch Asset Management, L.P. (MLAM) (which terms as used herein include their corporate predecessors) since 1983; Executive Vice President and Director of Princeton Services, Inc. (Princeton Services) since 1993; President of Princeton Funds Distributor, Inc. (PFD) since 1986 and Director thereof since 1991; President of Princeton Administrators, L.P. since 1988. James H. Bodurtha (55) Trustee (2)(3) 36 Popponesset Road, Cotuit, Massachusetts 02635. Director and Executive Vice President, The China Business Group, Inc. since 1996; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, China Enterprise Management Corporation from 1993 to 1996; Chairman, Berkshire Corporation since 1980; Partner, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey from 1980 to 1993. Herbert I. London (60) Trustee (2)(3) 113-115 University Place, New York, New York 10003. John M. Olin Professor of Humanities, New York University since 1993 and Professor thereof since 1980; President, Hudson Institute since 1997 and Trustee thereof since 1980; Dean, Gallatin Division of New York University from 1976 to 1993; Distinguished Fellow, Herman Kahn Chair, Hudson Institute from 1984 to 1985; Director, Damon Corporation from 1991 to 1995; Overseer, Center for Naval Analyses from 1983 to 1993; Limited Partner, Hypertech LP since 1996. Robert R. Martin (72) Trustee (2)(3) 513 Grand Hill, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Kinnard Investments, Inc. from 1990 to 1993; Executive Vice President, Dain Bosworth from 1974 to 1989; Director, Carnegie Capital Management from 1977 to 1985 and Chairman thereof in 1979; Director, Securities Industry Association from 1981 to 1982 and Public Securities Association from 1979 to 1980; Chairman of the Board, WTC Industries Inc. in 1994; Trustee, Northland College since 1992. Joseph L. May (70) Trustee (2)(3) 424 Church Street, Suite 2000, Nashville, Tennessee 37219. Attorney in private practice since 1984; President, May and Athens Hosiery Mills Division, Wayne-Gossard Corporation from 1954 to 1983; Vice President, Wayne-Gossard Corporation from 1972 to 1983; Chairman, The May Corporation (personal holding company) from 1972 to 1983; Director, Signal Apparel Co. from 1972 to 1989. André F. Perold (47) Trustee (2)(3) Morgan Hall, Soldiers Field, Boston, Massachusetts 02163. Professor, Harvard Business School since 1989 and Associate Professor from 1983 to 1989; Trustee, The Common Fund since 1989; Director, Quantec Limited since 1991 and TIBCO from 1994 to 1996. Arthur Zeikel (67) Trustee (1)(2) 300 Woodland Avenue, Westfield, New Jersey 07090. Chairman of the Manager and MLAM from 1997 to 1999 and President thereof from 1977 to 1997; Chairman of Princeton Services from 1997 to 1999, Director thereof from 1993 to 1999 and President thereof from 1993 to 1997; Executive Vice President of Merrill Lynch &Co., Inc. (ML & Co.) from 1990 to 1999. Vincent R. Giordano (55) Senior Vice President (1)(2) Senior Vice President of the Manager and MLAM since 1984; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services since 1993. Kenneth A. Jacob (48) Vice President (1)(2) First Vice President of MLAM since 1997; Vice President of MLAM from 1984 to 1997; Vice President of the Manager since 1984. Edward J. Andrews (39) Portfolio Manager and Vice President (1)(2) Vice President of the Manager and MLAM since 1991. |
15 |
Donald C. Burke (39) Vice President and Treasurer (1)(2) Senior Vice President and Treasurer of the Manager and MLAM since 1999; Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Princeton Services since 1999; Vice President of PFD since 1999; First Vice President of MLAM from 1997 to 1999; Vice President of MLAM from 1990 to 1997; Director of Taxation of MLAM since 1990. Alice A. Pellegrino (39) Secretary (1)(2) Vice President of MLAM since 1999; Attorney associated with MLAM since 1997; Associate with Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP from 1992 to 1997. __________ |
(1) |
Interested person, as defined in the Investment Company Act, of the Trust. |
(2) |
Such Trustee or officer is a director, trustee or officer of certain other investment companies for which the Manager or MLAM acts as the investment adviser or manager. |
(3) |
Member of the Trusts Audit and Nominating Committee, which is responsible for the selection of the independent auditors and the selection and nomination of non-interested Trustees. |
As of September 1, 1999, the Trustees, officers of the Trust and officers of the Funds as a group (12 persons) owned an aggregate of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the Funds. At such date, Mr. Zeikel, a Trustee of the Trust, Mr. Glenn, a Trustee and officer of the Trust and the other officers of the Trust and the Funds owned an aggregate of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock of ML & Co. The Trust pays each non-interested Trustee a fee of $5,000 per year plus $500 per Board meeting attended. The Trust also compensates members of its Audit and Nominating Committee (the Committee), which consists of all the non-interested Trustees, a fee of $1,000 per year plus $250 per Committee meeting attended. The Trust reimburses each non-interested Trustee for his out-of-pocket expenses relating to attendance at Board and Committee meetings. The fees and expenses of the Trustees are allocated to the respective series of the Trust on the basis of asset size. The following table shows the compensation earned by the non-interested Trustees for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999 and the aggregate compensation paid to them from all registered investment companies advised by the Manager and its affiliate, MLAM (MLAM/FAM-advised funds), for the calendar year ended December 31, 1998. |
Name
|
Position with Trust |
Compensation from Trust |
Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of Fund Expense |
Estimated Annual Benefits upon Retirement |
Aggregate Compensation from Trust and Other MLAM/FAM- Advised Funds(1) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
James H. Bodurtha | Trustee | $9,000 | None | None | $163,500 | ||||||
Herbert I. London | Trustee | $9,000 | None | None | $163,500 | ||||||
Robert R. Martin | Trustee | $9,000 | None | None | $163,500 | ||||||
Joseph L. May | Trustee | $9,000 | None | None | $163,500 | ||||||
André F. Perold | Trustee | $9,000 | None | None | $163,500 |
_________
(1) |
The Trustees serve on the boards of MLAM/FAM-advised funds as follows: Mr. Bodurtha (29 registered investment companies consisting of 47 portfolios); Mr. London (29 registered investment companies consisting of 47 portfolios); Mr. Martin (29 registered investment companies consisting of 47 portfolios); Mr. May (29 registered investment companies consisting of 47 portfolios); and Mr. Perold (29 registered investment companies consisting of 47 portfolios). |
16 |
below sets forth information about the total management fees paid by each Fund to the Manager and the amount of such fee, if any, voluntarily waived by the Manager, for the periods indicated. |
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fund
|
1999
|
1998
|
1997
|
||||
California Fund | $42,624 | (2) | $51,013 | (3) | |||
Florida Fund | (1 | ) | $79,912 | $90,513 |
(1) |
The Manager voluntarily waived the payment of $19,537 of the advisory fee. |
(2) |
The Manager voluntarily waived the payment of $24,356 of the advisory fee. |
(3) |
The Manager voluntarily waived the payment of $29,150 of the advisory fee. |
Payment of Fund Expenses. The Management Agreement obligates the Manager to provide investment advisory services and to pay all compensation of and furnish office space for officers and employees of the Trust connected with investment and economic research, trading and investment management of the Trust, as well as the fees of all Trustees of the Trust who are affiliated persons of ML & Co. or any of its affiliates. Each Fund pays all other expenses incurred in its operation and a portion of the Trusts general administrative expenses allocated on the basis of the asset size of the respective series of the Trust (Series), including the Funds and any additional Series added in the future. Expenses that will be borne directly by the Series include redemption expenses, expenses of portfolio transactions, expenses of registering the shares under federal and state securities laws, pricing costs (including the daily calculation of net asset value), expenses of printing shareholder reports, prospectuses and statements of additional information, except to the extent paid by Merrill Lynch Funds Distributor, a division of PFD (the Distributor) as described below, fees for legal and auditing services, Commission fees, interest, certain taxes and other expenses attributable to a particular Series. Expenses that will be allocated on the basis of asset size of the respective Series include fees and expenses of non-interested Trustees, state franchise taxes, costs of printing proxies and other expenses relating to shareholder meetings and other expenses properly payable by the Trust. The organizational expenses of the Trust were paid by the Trust, and as additional Series are added to the Trust, the organizational expenses will be allocated among the Series in a manner deemed equitable by the Trustees. Depending upon the nature of a lawsuit, litigation costs may be assessed to the specific Series to which the lawsuit relates or allocated on the basis of the asset size of the respective Series. The Trustees have determined that this is an appropriate method of allocation of expenses. Accounting services are provided to the Trust by the Manager and the Trust reimburses the Manager for its costs in connection with such services. As required by each Funds distribution agreements, the Distributor will pay the promotional expenses of that Fund incurred in connection with the offering of shares of that Fund. Certain expenses in connection with the account maintenance and distribution of Class B and Class C shares will be financed by the Trust pursuant to the Distribution Plans in compliance with Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act. See Purchase of Shares Distribution Plans. Reference is made to Management of the Funds in the Prospectus for certain information concerning the management and advisory arrangements of the Trust. Organization of the Manager. The Manager is a limited partnership, the partners of which are ML & Co., a financial services holding company and the parent of Merrill Lynch, and Princeton Services. ML & Co. and Princeton Services are controlling persons of the Manager as defined under the Investment Company Act because of their ownership of its voting securities or their power to exercise a controlling influence over its management or policies. Duration and Termination. Unless earlier terminated as described herein, the Management Agreement will remain in effect from year to year if approved annually (a) by the Trustees of the Trust or by a majority of the outstanding shares of each Fund and (b) by a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to such contract or interested persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) of any such party. Such contracts are not assignable and may be terminated without penalty on 60 days written notice at the option of either party or by vote of the shareholders of each Fund. Transfer Agency Services. Financial Data Services, Inc. (the Transfer Agent), a subsidiary of ML & Co., acts as the Trusts Transfer Agent pursuant to a Transfer Agency, Dividend Disbursing Agency and Shareholder Servicing Agency Agreement (the Transfer Agency Agreement). Pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent is responsible for the issuance, transfer and redemption of shares and the opening and maintenance of shareholder accounts. Pursuant to the Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent receives a fee of $11.00 per Class A or Class D account and $14.00 per Class B or Class C account and is entitled to |
17 |
18 |
19 |
are entitled to purchase additional Class A shares of each Fund in that account. Class A shares are available at net asset value to corporate warranty insurance reserve fund programs provided that the program has $3 million or more initially invested in Select Pricing Funds. Also eligible to purchase Class A shares in a shareholder account at net asset value are participants in certain investment programs including TMASM Managed Trusts to which Merrill Lynch Trust Company provides discretionary trustee services, collective investment trusts for which Merrill Lynch Trust Company serves as trustee and certain purchases made in connection with certain fee-based programs. In addition, Class A shares are offered at net asset value to ML & Co. and its subsidiaries and their directors and employees and to members of the Boards of MLAM-advised investment companies. Certain persons who acquired shares of certain MLAM-advised closed-end funds in their initial offerings who wish to reinvest the net proceeds from a sale of their closed-end fund shares of common stock in shares of each Fund also may purchase Class A shares of the Fund if certain conditions are met. In addition, Class A shares of each Fund and certain other Select Pricing Funds are offered at net asset value to shareholders of Merrill Lynch Senior Floating Rate Fund, Inc. and, if certain conditions are met, to shareholders of Merrill Lynch Municipal Strategy Fund, Inc. and Merrill Lynch High Income Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. who wish to reinvest the net proceeds from a sale of certain of their shares of common stock pursuant to a tender offer conducted by such funds in shares of each Fund and certain other Select Pricing Funds. Class A and Class D Sales Charge Information The gross sales charges, the amounts of such charges received by the Distributor and Merrill Lynch for the sale of Class A and Class D shares, and the CDSCs paid with respect to redemption within one year after purchase of Class A and Class D shares purchased subject to a front-end sales charge waiver, for each Fund for the periods indicated are set forth below: |
Class A
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Sales Charges Collected |
Sales Charges Retained by Distributor |
Sales Charges Paid to Merrill Lynch |
CDSCs Received on Redemption of Load-Waived Shares |
||||||
For the Year Ended July 31, 1999 | |||||||||
California Fund | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $0 | |||||
Florida Fund | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $0 | |||||
For the Year Ended July 31, 1998 | |||||||||
California Fund | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $0 | |||||
Florida Fund | $1,050 | $100 | $950 | $0 | |||||
For the Year Ended July 31, 1997 | |||||||||
California Fund | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $0 | |||||
Florida Fund | $ 631 | $ 68 | $563 | $0 |
Class D
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Sales Charges Collected |
Sales Charges Retained by Distributor |
Sales Charges Paid to Merrill Lynch |
CDSCs Received on Redemption of Load-Waived Shares |
||||||
For the Year Ended July 31, 1999 | |||||||||
California Fund | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $2,000 | |||||
Florida Fund | $ 638 | $ 41 | $ 597 | $ 0 | |||||
For the Year Ended July 31, 1998 | |||||||||
California Fund | $ 242 | $ 7 | $ 235 | $ 0 | |||||
Florida Fund | $ 337 | $ 13 | $ 324 | $2,988 | |||||
For the Year Ended July 31, 1997 | |||||||||
California Fund | $2,379 | $224 | $2,155 | $ 0 | |||||
Florida Fund | $ 576 | $ 55 | $ 521 | $ 0 |
The Distributor may reallow discounts to selected dealers and retain the balance over such discounts. At times the Distributor may reallow the entire sales charge to such dealers. Since securities dealers selling Class A |
20 |
and Class D shares of each Fund will receive a concession equal to most of the sales charge, they may be deemed to be underwriters under the Securities Act. Reductions in or exemptions from the imposition of a sales load are due to the nature of the investors and/or the reduced sales efforts that will be needed in obtaining such investments. Reinvested Dividends. No initial sales charges are imposed upon Class A and Class D shares issued as a result of the automatic reinvestment of dividends. Right of Accumulation. Reduced sales charges are applicable through a right of accumulation under which eligible investors are permitted to purchase shares of a Fund subject to an initial sales charge at the offering price applicable to the total of (a) the public offering price of the shares then being purchased plus (b) an amount equal to the then current net asset value or cost, whichever is higher, of the purchasers combined holdings of all classes of shares of a Fund and of any other Select Pricing Funds. For any such right of accumulation to be made available, the Distributor must be provided at the time of purchase, by the purchaser or the purchasers securities dealer, with sufficient information to permit confirmation of qualification. Acceptance of the purchase order is subject to such confirmation. The right of accumulation may be amended or terminated at any time. Shares held in the name of a nominee or custodian under pension, profit-sharing or other employee benefit plans may not be combined with other shares to qualify for the right of accumulation. Letter of Intent. Reduced sales charges are applicable to purchases aggregating $100,000 or more of the Class A or Class D shares of a Fund or any Select Pricing Funds made within a 13-month period starting with the first purchase pursuant to a Letter of Intent. The Letter of Intent is available only to investors whose accounts are established and maintained at the Trusts Transfer Agent. The Letter of Intent is not available to employee benefit plans for which Merrill Lynch provides plan participant recordkeeping services. The Letter of Intent is not a binding obligation to purchase any amount of Class A or Class D shares of any Fund; however, its execution will result in the purchaser paying a lower sales charge at the appropriate quantity purchase level. A purchase not originally made pursuant to a Letter of Intent may be included under a subsequent Letter of Intent executed within 90 days of such purchase if the Distributor is informed in writing of this intent within such 90-day period. The value of Class A and Class D shares of a Fund and of other Select Pricing Funds presently held, at cost or maximum offering price (whichever is higher), on the date of the first purchase under the Letter of Intent, may be included as a credit toward the completion of such Letter, but the reduced sales charge applicable to the amount covered by such Letter will be applied only to new purchases. If the total amount of shares does not equal the amount stated in the Letter of Intent (minimum of $100,000), the investor will be notified and must pay, within 20 days of the expiration of such Letter, the difference between the sales charge on the Class A or Class D shares purchased at the reduced rate and the sales charge applicable to the shares of the Fund actually purchased through the Letter. Class A or Class D shares equal to at least 5.0% of the intended amount will be held in escrow during the 13-month period (while remaining registered in the name of the purchaser) for this purpose. The first purchase under the Letter of Intent must be at least 5.0% of the dollar amount of such Letter. If a purchase during the term of such Letter would otherwise be subject to a further reduced sales charge based on the right of accumulation, the purchaser will be entitled on that purchase and subsequent purchases to the further reduced percentage sales charge that would be applicable to a single purchase equal to the total dollar value of the Class A or Class D shares then being purchased under such Letter, but there will be no retroactive reduction of the sales charge on any previous purchase. The value of any shares redeemed or otherwise disposed of by the purchaser prior to termination or completion of the Letter of Intent will be deducted from the total purchases made under such Letter. An exchange from the Summit Cash Reserves Fund into the Fund that creates a sales charge will count toward completing a new or existing Letter of Intent from the Fund. TMASMManaged Trusts. Class A shares are offered at net asset value to TMASM Managed Trusts to which Merrill Lynch Trust Company provides discretionary trustee services. Employee AccessSM Accounts. Provided applicable threshold requirements are met, either Class A or Class D shares are offered at net asset value to Employee AccessSM Accounts available through authorized employers. The |
21 |
initial minimum investment for such accounts is $500, except that the initial minimum investment for shares purchased for such accounts pursuant to the Automatic Investment Program is $50. Employer-Sponsored Retirement or Savings Plans and Certain Other Arrangements. Certain employer-sponsored retirement or savings plans and certain other arrangements may purchase Class A or Class D shares at net asset value, based on the number of employees or number of employees eligible to participate in the plan, the aggregate amount invested by the plan in specified investments and/or the services provided by Merrill Lynch to the plan. Additional information regarding purchases by employer-sponsored retirement or savings plans and certain other arrangements is available toll-free from Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services at (800) 237-7777. Purchase Privilege of Certain Persons. Trustees of the Trust, members of the Boards of other MLAM-advised funds, ML & Co. and its subsidiaries (the term subsidiaries, when used herein with respect to ML & Co., includes MLAM, FAM and certain other entities directly or indirectly wholly owned and controlled by ML & Co.) and their directors and employees, and any trust, pension, profit-sharing or other benefit plan for such persons, may purchase Class A shares of a Fund at net asset value. Class D shares of each Fund are offered at net asset value, without a sales charge, to an investor that has a business relationship with a Financial Consultant who joined Merrill Lynch from another investment firm within six months prior to the date of purchase by such investor, if the following conditions are satisfied: first, the investor must advise Merrill Lynch that it will purchase Class D shares of the Fund with proceeds from a redemption of shares of a mutual fund that was sponsored by the Financial Consultants previous firm and was subject to a sales charge either at the time of purchase or on a deferred basis; and, second, the investor must establish that such redemption had been made within 60 days prior to the investment in the Fund and the proceeds from the redemption had been maintained in the interim in cash or a money market fund. Class D shares of each Fund are also offered at net asset value, without a sales charge, to an investor that has a business relationship with a Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant and that has invested in a mutual fund sponsored by a non-Merrill Lynch company for which Merrill Lynch has served as a selected dealer and where Merrill Lynch has either received or given notice that such arrangement will be terminated (notice) if the following conditions are satisfied: first, the investor must purchase Class D shares of the Fund with proceeds from a redemption of shares of such other mutual fund and the shares of such other fund were subject to a sales charge either at the time of purchase or on a deferred basis; and, second, such purchase of Class D shares must be made within 90 days after such notice. Class D shares of each Fund are offered at net asset value, without a sales charge, to an investor that has a business relationship with a Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant and that has invested in a mutual fund for which Merrill Lynch has not served as a selected dealer if the following conditions are satisfied: first, the investor must advise Merrill Lynch that it will purchase Class D shares of the Fund with proceeds from the redemption of shares of such other mutual fund and that such shares have been outstanding for a period of no less than six months; and, second, such purchase of Class D shares must be made within 60 days after the redemption and the proceeds from the redemption must be maintained in the interim in cash or a money market fund. Closed-End Fund Investment Option. Class A shares of each Fund and certain other Select Pricing Funds (Eligible Class A Shares) are offered at net asset value to shareholders of certain closed-end funds advised by FAM or MLAM who purchased such closed-end fund shares prior to October 21, 1994 (the date the Merrill Lynch Select PricingSM System commenced operations) and wish to reinvest the net proceeds from a sale of their closed-end fund shares of common stock in Eligible Class A Shares, if the conditions set forth below are satisfied. Alternatively, closed-end fund shareholders who purchased such shares on or after October 21, 1994 and wish to reinvest the net proceeds from a sale of their closed-end fund shares are offered Class A shares (if eligible to buy Class A shares) or Class D shares of each Fund and other Select Pricing Funds (Eligible Class D Shares), if the following conditions are met. First, the sale of closed-end fund shares must be made through Merrill Lynch, and the net proceeds therefrom must be immediately reinvested in Eligible Class A or Eligible Class D Shares. Second, the closed-end fund shares must either have been acquired in the initial public offering or be shares representing dividends from shares of common stock acquired in such offering. Third, the closed-end fund shares must have been continuously maintained in a Merrill Lynch securities account. Fourth, there must be a minimum purchase of $250 to be eligible for the investment option. |
22 |
Year Since Purchase Payment Made
|
CDSC as a Percentage of Dollar Amount Subject to Charge |
||
---|---|---|---|
0-1 | 1.0 | % | |
1 and thereafter | Non | e |
23 To provide an example, assume an investor purchased 100 shares at $10 per share (at a cost of $1,000) and during the first year after acquisition, the net asset value per share is $12 and, during such time, the investor has acquired 10 additional shares upon dividend reinvestment. If at such time the investor makes his or her first redemption of 50 shares (proceeds of $600), 10 shares will not be subject to a CDSC because of dividend reinvestment. With respect to the remaining 40 shares, the charge is applied only to the original cost of $10 per share and not to the increase in net asset value of $2 per share. Therefore, $400 of the $600 redemption proceeds will be charged at a rate of 1.0% (the applicable rate during the first year after acquisition). The Class B CDSC may be waived on redemptions of shares in certain circumstances, including any partial or complete redemption following the death or disability (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code)) of a Class B shareholder (including one who owns the Class B shares as joint tenant with his or her spouse), provided the redemption is requested within one year of the death or initial determination of disability or, if late, reasonably, promptly, following completion of probate. The Class B CDSC may be waived or its terms may be modified in connection with certain fee-based programs. The Class B CDSC may also be waived in connection with involuntary termination of an account in which Fund shares are held or for withdrawals through the Merrill Lynch Systematic Withdrawal Plan. See Shareholder Services Fee-Based Programs and Systematic Withdrawal Plan. Conversion of Class B Shares to Class D Shares. After approximately ten years (the Conversion Period), Class B shares of a Fund will be converted automatically into Class D shares of same Fund. Class D shares are subject to an ongoing account maintenance fee of 0.10% of net assets but are not subject to the distribution fee that is borne by Class B shares. Automatic conversion of Class B shares into Class D shares will occur at least once each month (on the Conversion Date) on the basis of the relative net asset value of the shares of the two classes on the Conversion Date, without the imposition of any sales load, fee or other charge. Conversion of Class B shares to Class D shares will not be deemed a purchase or sale of the shares for Federal income tax purposes. In addition, shares purchased through reinvestment of dividends on Class B shares also will convert automatically to Class D shares. The Conversion Date for dividend reinvestment shares will be calculated taking into account the length of time the shares underlying such dividend reinvestment shares were outstanding. If at the Conversion Date the conversion of Class B shares of a Fund to Class D shares of that Fund in a single account will result in less than $50 worth of Class B shares being left in the account, all of the Class B shares of the Fund held in the account on the Conversion Date will be converted to Class D shares of that Fund. In general, Class B shares of equity Select Pricing Funds will convert approximately eight years after initial purchase and Class B shares of taxable and tax-exempt fixed income Select Pricing Funds will convert approximately ten years after initial purchase. If, during the Conversion Period, a shareholder exchanges Class B shares with an eight-year Conversion Period for Class B shares with a ten-year Conversion Period, or vice versa, the Conversion Period applicable to the Class B shares acquired in the exchange will apply and the holding period for the shares exchanged will be tacked on to the holding period for the shares acquired. The conversion period also may be modified for investors that participate in certain fee-based programs. See Shareholder Services Fee-Based Programs. Class B shareholders of a Fund exercising the exchange privilege described under Shareholder Services Exchange Privilege will continue to be subject to the Funds CDSC schedule if such schedule is higher than the CDSC schedule relating to the Class B shares acquired as a result of the exchange. Share certificates for Class B shares of a Fund to be converted must be delivered to the Transfer Agent at least one week prior to the Conversion Date applicable to those shares. In the event such certificates are not received by the Transfer Agent at least one week prior to the Conversion Date, the related Class B shares will convert to Class D shares on the next scheduled Conversion Date after such certificates are delivered. The Class C CDSC may be waived in connection with involuntary termination of an account in which Fund shares are held and withdrawals through the Merrill Lynch Systematic Withdrawal Plan. See Shareholder Services Fee-Based Programs and Systematic Withdrawal Plan. |
24 |
Class B and Class C Sales Charge Information |
Class B
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California Fund
|
Florida Fund
|
||||||||
For the Fiscal Year Ended July 31, |
CDSCs Received by Distributor |
CDSCs Paid to Merrill Lynch |
CDSCs Received by Distributor |
CDSCs paid to Merrill Lynch |
|||||
1999 | $4,119 | $4,119 | $2,089 | $2,089 | |||||
1998 | $3,550 | $3,550 | $4,821 | $4,821 | |||||
1997 | $6,780 | $6,780 | $7,396 | $7,396 |
__________
* |
Additional Class B CDSCs payable to the Distributor may have been waived or converted to a contingent obligation in connection with a shareholders participation in certain fee-based programs. |
Class C
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California Fund
|
Florida Fund
|
||||||||
For the Fiscal Year Ended July 31, |
CDSCs Received by Distributor |
CDSCs Paid to Merrill Lynch |
CDSCs Received by Distributor |
CDSCs paid to Merrill Lynch |
|||||
1999 | $106 | $106 | $0 | $0 | |||||
1998 | $ 63 | $ 63 | $0 | $0 | |||||
1997 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $0 | $0 |
Merrill Lynch compensates its Financial Consultants for selling Class B and Class C shares at the time of purchase from its own funds. Proceeds from the CDSC and the distribution fee are paid to the Distributor and are used in whole or in part by the Distributor to defray the expenses of dealers (including Merrill Lynch) related to providing distribution-related services to each Fund in connection with the sale of the Class B and Class C shares, such as the payment of compensation to financial consultants for selling Class B and Class C shares from the dealers own funds. The combination of the CDSC and the ongoing distribution fee facilitates the ability of the Fund to sell the Class B and Class C shares without a sales charge being deducted at the time of purchase. See Distribution Plans below. Imposition of the CDSC and the distribution fee on Class B and Class C shares is limited by the NASD asset-based sales charge rule. See Limitations on the Payment of Deferred Sales Charges below. Reference is made to Fees and Expenses in the Prospectus for certain information with respect to the separate distribution plans for Class B, Class C and Class D shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act (each a Distribution Plan) with respect to the account maintenance and/or distribution fees paid by the Fund to the Distributor with respect to such classes. The Distribution Plans for Class B, Class C and Class D shares each provides that each Fund pays the Distributor an account maintenance fee relating to the shares of the relevant class, accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rates of 0.15%, 0.15% and 0.10%, respectively, of the average daily net assets of each Fund attributable to shares of the relevant class in order to compensate the Distributor and Merrill Lynch (pursuant to a sub-agreement) in connection with account maintenance activities with respect to Class B, Class C and Class D shares. Each of those classes has exclusive voting rights with respect to the Distribution Plan adopted with respect to such class pursuant to which account maintenance and/or distribution fees are paid (except that Class B shareholders may vote upon any material changes to expenses charged under the Class D Distribution Plan). The Distribution Plans for Class B and Class C shares provides that each Fund also pays the Distributor a distribution fee relating to the shares of the relevant class, accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of 0.20%, of the average daily net assets of each Fund attributable to the shares of the relevant class in order to compensate the Distributor and Merrill Lynch (pursuant to a sub-agreement) for providing shareholder and distribution services and bearing certain distribution-related expenses of each Fund, including payments to financial consultants for selling Class B and Class C shares of each Fund. The Distribution Plans relating to Class B and Class C shares are designed to permit an investor to purchase Class B and Class C shares through dealers |
25 |
without the assessment of an initial sales charge and at the same time permit the dealer to compensate its financial consultants in connection with the sale of the Class B and Class C shares. The Funds Distribution Plans are subject to the provisions of Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act. In their consideration of each Distribution Plan, the Trustees must consider all factors they deem relevant, including information as to the benefits of the Distribution Plan to each Fund and each related class of shareholders. Each Distribution Plan further provides that, so long as the Distribution Plan remains in effect, the selection and nomination of non-interested Trustees shall be committed to the discretion of the non-interested Trustees then in office. In approving each Distribution Plan in accordance with Rule 12b-1, the non-interested Trustees concluded that there is reasonable likelihood that each Distribution Plan will benefit the related Fund and its related class of shareholders. Each Distribution Plan can be terminated at any time, without penalty, by the vote of a majority of the non-interested Trustees or by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding related class of voting securities of the related Fund. A Distribution Plan cannot be amended to increase materially the amount to be spent by the related Fund without the approval of the related class of shareholders and all material amendments are required to be approved by the vote of Trustees, including a majority of the non-interested Trustees who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the Distribution Plan, cast in person at a meeting called for that purpose. Rule 12b-1 further requires that the Trust preserve copies of the Distribution Plan and any report made pursuant to such plan for a period of not less than six years from the date of the Distribution Plan or such report, the first two years in an easily accessible place. Among other things, each Distribution Plan provides that the Distributor shall provide and the Trustees shall review quarterly reports of the disbursement of the account maintenance and/or distribution fees paid to the Distributor. Payments under the Distribution Plans are based on a percentage of average daily net assets attributable to the shares of each Fund regardless of the amount of expenses incurred and, accordingly, distribution-related revenues from the Distribution Plans may be more or less than distribution-related expenses. Information with respect to the distribution-related revenues and expenses is presented to the Trustees for their consideration in connection with their deliberations as to the continuance of the Class B and Class C Distribution Plans annually, as of December 31 of each year, on a fully allocated accrual basis and quarterly on a direct expense and revenue/cash basis. On the fully allocated accrual basis, revenues consist of the account maintenance fees, distribution fees, the CDSCs and certain other related revenues, and expenses consist of financial consultant compensation, branch office and regional operation center selling and transaction processing expenses, advertising, sales promotion and marketing expenses, corporate overhead and interest expense. On the direct expense and revenue/cash basis, revenues consist of the account maintenance fees, distribution fees and CDSCs and the expenses consist of financial consultant compensation. With respect to the California Fund, as of December 31, 1998, the last date for which fully allocated accrual data is available, the fully allocated accrual expenses of the Distributor and Merrill Lynch for the period since the commencement of operations of Class B shares exceeded the fully allocated accrual revenues by approximately $57,000 (1.20% of Class B net assets at that date). As of July 31, 1999, direct cash revenues for the period since the commencement of operations of Class B shares exceeded direct cash expenses by $81,303 (2.19% of Class B net assets at that date). Information regarding fully allocated accrual data for Class C California Fund shares for the period October 21, 1994 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 1998 is not presented because such revenues and expenses are de minimis. As of July 31, 1999, direct cash revenues for the period since the commencement of operations of Class C shares exceeded direct cash expenses by $558 (0.49% of Class C net assets at that date). For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, the California Fund paid the Distributor $________ pursuant to the Class B Distribution Plan (based on average daily net assets subject to such Class B Distribution Plan of approximately $_____ million), $______ of which was paid to Merrill Lynch for providing account maintenance and distribution-related activities and services in connection with Class B shares. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, the California Fund paid the Distributor $______ pursuant to the Class C Distribution Plan (based on average daily net assets subject to such Class C Distribution Plan of approximately $___ million), $______ of which was paid to Merrill Lynch for providing account maintenance and distribution-related activities and services in connection with Class C shares. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1999, the California Fund paid the Distributor $_______ pursuant to the Class D Distribution Plan (based on average daily net assets subject to such |
26 |
27 |
Data Calculated as of July 31, 1999 (in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eligible Gross Sales(1) |
Allowable Aggregate Sales Charges |
Allowable Interest on Unpaid Balance(2) |
Maximum Amount Payable |
Amounts Previously Paid to Distributor(3) |
Aggregate Unpaid Balance |
Annual Distribution Fee at Current Net Asset Level(4) |
|||||||||
California Fund | |||||||||||||||
Under NASD Rule as Adopted | $15,439 | $ 965 | $486 | $1,451 | $124 | $1,327 | $ 8 | ||||||||
Under Distributors Voluntary Waiver | $15,439 | $ 965 | $ 77 | $1,042 | $124 | $ 918 | $ 8 | ||||||||
Florida Fund | |||||||||||||||
Under NASD Rule as Adopted | $24,966 | $1,606 | $738 | $2,344 | $407 | $1,937 | $16 | ||||||||
Under Distributors Voluntary Waiver | $24,966 | $1,606 | $ 79 | $1,685 | $407 | $1,278 | $16 |
__________
(1) |
Purchase price of all eligible Class B shares sold since November 26, 1993 (commencement of operations) other than shares acquired through dividend reinvestment and the exchange privilege. |
(2) |
Includes amounts attributable to exchanges from Summit Cash Reserves Fund (Summit) that are not reflected in Eligible Gross Sales. Shares of Summit can only be purchased by exchange from another fund (the redeemed fund). Upon such an exchange, the maximum allowable sales charge payment to the redeemed fund is reduced in accordance with the amount of the redemption. this amount is then added to the maximum allowable sales charge payment with respect to Summit. Upon an exchange out of Summit, the remaining balance of this amount is deducted from the maximum allowable sales charge payment to Summit and added to the maximum allowable sales charge payment to the fund into which the exchange is made. |
(3) |
Interest is computed on a monthly basis based upon the prime rate, as reported in The Wall Street Journal, plus 1.0%, as permitted under the NASD Rule. |
(4) |
Consists of CDSC payments, distribution fee payments and accruals. See What are the Funds fees and expenses? in the Prospectus. This figure may include CDSCs that were deferred when a shareholder redeemed shares prior to the expiration of the applicable CDSC period and invested the proceeds, without the imposition of a sales charge, in Class A shares in conjunction with the shareholders participation in the Merrill Lynch Mutual Fund Advisor (Merrill Lynch MFASM) Program (the MFA Program). The CDSC is booked as a contingent obligation that may be payable if the shareholder terminates participation in the MFA Program. |
(5) |
Provided to illustrate the extent to which the current level of distribution fee payments (not including any CDSC payments) is amortizing the unpaid balance. No assurance can be given that payments of the distribution fee will reach either the voluntary maximum (with respect to Class B shares) or the NASD maximum (with respect to Class B and Class C shares). |
Reference is made to How to Buy, Sell, Transfer and Exchange Shares in the Prospectus. The Trust is required to redeem for cash all shares of any Fund upon receipt of a written request in proper form. The redemption price is the net asset value per share next determined after the initial receipt of proper notice of redemption. Except for any CDSC that may be applicable, there will be no charge for redemption if the redemption request is sent directly to the Transfer Agent. Shareholders liquidating their holdings will receive upon redemption all dividends reinvested through the date of redemption. The right to redeem shares or to receive payment with respect to any such redemption may be suspended for more than seven days only for any period during which trading on the NYSE is restricted as determined by the Commission or the NYSE is closed (other than customary weekend and holiday closings), for any period during which an emergency exists as defined by the Commission as a result of which disposal of portfolio securities or determination of the net asset value of a Fund is not reasonably practicable, and for such other periods as the Commission may by order permit for the protection of shareholders of that Fund. The value of shares at the time of redemption may be more or less than the shareholders cost, depending in part on the market value of the securities held by a Fund at such time. A shareholder wishing to redeem shares held with the Transfer Agent may do so without charge by tendering the shares directly to the Transfer Agent at Financial Data Services, Inc., P.O. Box 45289, Jacksonville, Florida 32232-5289. Redemption requests delivered other than by mail should be delivered to Financial Data Services, Inc., 4800 Deer Lake Drive East, Jacksonville, Florida 32246-6484. Proper notice of redemption in the case of shares deposited with the Transfer Agent may be accomplished by a written letter requesting redemption. Proper notice of redemption in the case of shares for which certificates have been issued may be accomplished by a written letter as noted above accompanied by certificates for the shares to be redeemed. Redemption requests should not be sent to the the Trust or any Fund. The redemption request in either event requires the signature(s) of all persons in whose name(s) the shares are registered, signed exactly as such name(s) appear(s) on the |
28 |
29 |
Class A
|
Class B
|
Class C
|
Class D
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California Fund | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||
|
|||||||||
Number of Shares Outstanding | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
Net Asset Value Per Share (net assets | |||||||||
divided by number of shares | |||||||||
outstanding) | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||
|
|||||||||
Sales Charge (for Class A and Class D | |||||||||
shares: 1.00% of offering price; 1.01% | |||||||||
of net asset value per share)* | ** | ** | |||||||
|
|||||||||
Offering Price | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||
|
30 |
Class A
|
Class B
|
Class C
|
Class D
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Florida Fund | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||
|
|||||||||
Number of Shares Outstanding | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
Net Asset Value Per Share (net assets | |||||||||
divided by number of shares | |||||||||
outstanding) | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||
|
|||||||||
Sales Charge (for Class A and Class D | |||||||||
shares: 1.00% of offering price; 1.01% | |||||||||
of net asset value per share)* | ** | ** | |||||||
|
|||||||||
Offering Price | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||
|
_________
* |
Rounded to the nearest one-hundredth percent; assumes maximum sales charge is applicable. |
** |
Class B and Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge but may be subject to a CDSC on redemption of shares within one year of purchase. See Purchase of Shares Deferred Sales Charge Alternatives Class B and Class C Shares Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Class B Shares and Class C Shares herein. |
For the Year Ended July 31, 1999 |
For the Year Ended July 31, 1998 |
For the Year Ended July 31, 1997 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fund
|
Number of Transactions |
Aggregate Dollar Amount |
Number of Transactions |
Aggregate Dollar Amount |
Number of Transactions |
Aggregate Dollar Amount |
|||||||
California Fund | 1 | $200,000 | 0 | $ 0 | |||||||||
Florida Fund | 0 |
$ 0 |
4 | $600,000 |
An affiliated person of the Trust may serve as broker for a Fund in OTC transactions conducted on an agency basis. Certain court decisions have raised questions as to the extent to which investment companies should seek exemptions under the Investment Company Act in order to seek to recapture underwriting and dealer spreads from affiliated entities. The Trustees have considered all factors deemed relevant and have made a determination not to seek such recapture at this time. The Trustees will reconsider this matter from time to time. Neither Fund may purchase securities, including Municipal Bonds, during the existence of any underwriting syndicate of which Merrill Lynch is a member or in a private placement in which Merrill Lynch serves as placement agent except pursuant to procedures approved by the Trustees of the Trust which either comply with rules adopted by the Commission or with interpretations of the Commission staff. Rule 10f-3 under the Investment Company Act sets forth conditions under which a Fund may purchase Municipal Bonds from an underwriting syndicate of which Merrill Lynch is a member. The rule sets forth requirements relating to, among other things, the terms of an issue of Municipal Bonds purchased by a Fund, the amount of Municipal Bonds that may be purchased in any one issue and the assets of a Fund that may be invested in a particular issue. Section 11(a) of the Exchange Act generally prohibits members of the U.S. national securities exchanges from executing exchange transactions for their affiliates and institutional accounts that they manage unless the member (i) has obtained prior express authorization from the account to effect such transactions, (ii) at least annually furnishes the account with a statement setting forth the aggregate compensation received by the member in effecting such transactions, and (iii) complies with any rules the Commission has prescribed with respect to the requirements of clauses (i) and (ii). To the extent Section 11(a) would apply to Merrill Lynch acting as a broker for a Fund in any of its portfolio transactions executed on any such securities exchange of which it is a member, appropriate consents have been obtained from each Fund and annual statements as to aggregate compensation will be provided to each Fund. Securities may be held by, or be appropriate investments for, each Fund as well as other funds or investment advisory clients of the Manager or MLAM. Because of different objectives or other factors, a particular security may be bought for one or more clients of the Manager or an affiliate when one or more clients of the Manager or an affiliate are selling the same security. If purchases or sales of securities arise for consideration at or about the same time that would involve a Fund or other clients or funds for which the Manager or an affiliate acts as manager transactions in such securities will be made, insofar as feasible, for the respective funds and clients in a manner deemed equitable to all. To the extent that transactions on behalf of more than one client of the Manager or an affiliate during the same period may increase the demand for securities being purchased or the supply of securities being sold, there may be an adverse effect on price. The Trust offers a number of shareholder services and investment plans described below that are designed to facilitate investment in shares of the Funds. Full details as to each of such services, copies of the various plans and instructions as to how to participate in the various services or plans, or how to change options with respect thereto, can be obtained from the Trust, by calling the telephone number on the cover page hereof, or from the Distributor or Merrill Lynch. Each shareholder whose account is maintained at the Transfer Agent has an Investment Account and will receive statements, at least quarterly, from the Transfer Agent. These statements will serve as transaction confirmations for automatic investment purchases and the reinvestment of dividends. The statements will also show any other activity in the account since the preceding statement. Shareholders will also receive separate |
32 |
confirmations for each purchase or sale transaction other than automatic investment purchases and the reinvestment of dividends. A shareholder with an account held at the Transfer Agent may make additions to his or her Investment Account at any time by mailing a check directly to the Transfer Agent. A shareholder may also maintain an account through Merrill Lynch. Upon the transfer of shares out of a Merrill Lynch brokerage account, an Investment Account in the transferring shareholders name may be opened automatically at the Transfer Agent. Share certificates are issued only for full shares and only upon the specific request of a shareholder who has an Investment Account. Issuance of certificates representing all or only part of the full shares in an Investment Account may be requested by a shareholder directly from the Transfer Agent. Shareholders may transfer their Fund shares from Merrill Lynch to another securities dealer that has entered into a selected dealer agreement with Merrill Lynch. Certain shareholder services may not be available for the transferred shares. After the transfer, the shareholder may purchase additional shares of funds owned before the transfer and all future trading of these assets must be coordinated by the new firm. If a shareholder wishes to transfer his or her shares to a securities dealer that has not entered into a selected dealer agreement with Merrill Lynch, the shareholder must either (i) redeem his or her shares, paying any applicable CDSC or (ii) continue to maintain an Investment Account at the Transfer Agent for those shares. The shareholder may also request the new securities dealer to maintain the shares in an account at the Transfer Agent registered in the name of the securities dealer for the benefit of the shareholder whether the securities dealer has entered into a selected dealer agreement or not. Shareholders considering transferring a tax-deferred retirement account, such as an individual retirement account, from Merrill Lynch to another securities dealer should be aware that, if the firm to which the retirement account is to be transferred will not take delivery of shares of a Fund, a shareholder must either redeem the shares, paying any applicable CDSC, so that the cash proceeds can be transferred to the account at the new firm, or such shareholder must continue to maintain a retirement account at Merrill Lynch for those shares. U.S. shareholders of each class of shares of each Fund have an exchange privilege with certain other Select Pricing Funds and Summit Cash Reserves Fund (Summit), a series of Financial Institutions Series Trust, which is a Merrill Lynch-sponsored money market mutual fund specifically designated for exchange by holders of Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares of Select Pricing Funds. Shares with a net asset value of at least $100 are required to qualify for the exchange privilege and any shares utilized in an exchange must have been held by the shareholder for at least 15 days. Before effecting an exchange, shareholders should obtain a currently effective prospectus of the fund into which the exchange is to be made. Exercise of the exchange privilege is treated as a sale of the exchanged shares and a purchase of the acquired shares for Federal income tax purposes. Exchanges of Class A and Class D Shares. Class A shareholders may exchange Class A shares of a Fund for Class A shares of a second Select Pricing Fund if the shareholder holds any Class A shares of the second fund in his or her account in which the exchange is made at the time of the exchange or is otherwise eligible to purchase Class A shares of the second fund. If the Class A shareholder wants to exchange Class A shares of a Fund for shares of a second Select Pricing Fund, but does not hold Class A shares of the second fund in his or her account at the time of the exchange and is not otherwise eligible to acquire Class A shares of the second fund, the shareholder will receive Class D shares of the second fund as a result of the exchange. Class D shares of a Fund also may be exchanged for Class A shares of a second Select Pricing Fund at any time as long as, at the time of the exchange, the shareholder holds Class A shares of the second fund in the account in which the exchange is made or is otherwise eligible to purchase Class A shares of the second fund. Class D shares of a Fund are exchangeable with shares of the same class of other Select Pricing Funds. Exchanges of Class A or Class D shares outstanding (outstanding Class A or Class D shares) for Class A or Class D shares of other Select Pricing Funds or for Class A shares of Summit (new Class A or Class D shares) are transacted on the basis of relative net asset value per Class A or Class D share, respectively, plus an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the sales charge previously paid on the outstanding Class A or Class D shares and the sales charge payable at the time of the exchange on the new Class A or Class D shares. With respect to outstanding Class A or Class D shares as to which previous exchanges have taken place, the |
33 |
sales charge previously paid shall include the aggregate of the sales charges paid with respect to such Class A or Class D shares in the initial purchase and any subsequent exchange. Class A or Class D shares issued pursuant to dividend reinvestment are sold on a no-load basis in each of the funds offering Class A or Class D shares. For purposes of the exchange privilege, Class A or Class D shares acquired through dividend reinvestment shall be deemed to have been sold with a sales charge equal to the sales charge previously paid on the Class A or Class D shares on which the dividend was paid. Based on this formula, Class A and Class D shares generally may be exchanged into the Class A or Class D shares, respectively, of the other funds with a reduced sales charge or without a sales charge. Exchanges of Class B and Class C Shares. Certain Select Pricing Funds with Class B or Class C shares outstanding (outstanding Class B or Class C shares) offer to exchange their Class B or Class C shares for Class B or Class C shares, respectively, of certain other Select Pricing Funds or for Class B shares of Summit (new Class B or Class C shares) on the basis of relative net asset value per Class B or Class C share, without the payment of any CDSC that might otherwise be due on redemption of the outstanding shares. Class B shareholders of a Fund exercising the exchange privilege will continue to be subject to that Funds CDSC schedule if such schedule is higher than the CDSC schedule relating to the new Class B shares acquired through use of the exchange privilege. In addition, Class B shares of a Fund acquired through use of the exchange privilege will be subject to that Funds CDSC schedule if such schedule is higher than the CDSC schedule relating to the Class B shares of the fund from which the exchange has been made. For purposes of computing the CDSC that may be payable on a disposition of the new Class B or Class C shares, the holding period for the outstanding Class B or Class C shares is tacked to the holding period of the new Class B or Class C shares. For example, an investor may exchange Class B or Class C shares of a Fund for those of Merrill Lynch Special Value Fund, Inc. (Special Value Fund) after having held that Funds Class B shares for two and a half years. The 2% CDSC that generally would apply to a redemption would not apply to the exchange. Three years later the investor may decide to redeem the Class B shares of Special Value Fund and receive cash. There will be no CDSC due on this redemption, since by tacking the two and a half year holding period of Fund Class B shares to the three-year holding period for the Special Value Fund Class B shares, the investor will be deemed to have held the Special Value Fund Class B shares for more than five years. Exchanges for Shares of a Money Market Fund. Class A and Class D shares are exchangeable for Class A shares of Summit and Class B and Class C shares are exchangeable for Class B shares of Summit. Class A shares of Summit have an exchange privilege back into Class A or Class D shares of Select Pricing Funds; Class B shares of Summit have an exchange privilege back into Class B or Class C shares of Select Pricing Funds and, in the event of such an exchange, the period of time that Class B shares of Summit are held will count toward satisfaction of the holding period requirement for purposes of reducing any CDSC and toward satisfaction of any Conversion Period with respect to Class B shares. Class B shares of Summit will be subject to a distribution fee at an annual rate of 0.75% of average daily net assets of such Class B shares. This exchange privilege does not apply with respect to certain Merrill Lynch fee-based programs for which alternative exchange arrangements may exist. Please see your Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant for further information. Prior to October 12, 1998, exchanges from the Funds and other Select Pricing Funds into a money market fund were directed to certain Merrill Lynch-sponsored money market funds other than Summit. Shareholders who exchanged Select Pricing Fund shares for shares of such other money market funds and subsequently wish to exchange those money market fund shares for shares of a Fund will be subject to the CDSC schedule applicable to such Fund shares, if any. The holding period for those money market fund shares will not count toward satisfaction of the holding period requirement for reduction of the CDSC imposed on such shares, if any, and, with respect to Class B shares, toward satisfaction of the Conversion Period. Exchanges by Participants in the MFA Program. The Funds exchange privilege is also modified with respect to purchases of Class A and Class D shares by investors under the MFA Program. First, the initial allocation of assets is made under the MFA Program. Then any subsequent exchange under the MFA Program of Class A or Class D shares of a Select Pricing Fund for Class A or Class D shares of the Fund will be made solely on the basis of the relative net asset values of the shares being exchanged. Therefore, there will not be a charge for any difference between the sales charge previously paid on the shares of the other Select Pricing Fund and the sales charge payable on the shares of the Fund being acquired in the exchange under the MFA Program. |
34 |
36 |
shareholder may select the month in which the shares are to be redeemed and may designate whether the redemption is to be made on the first, second, third or fourth Monday of the month. If the Monday selected is not a business day, the redemption will be processed at net asset value on the next business day. The CMA® or CBA® Systematic Redemption Program is not available if shares of a Fund are being purchased within the account pursuant to the Automatic Investment Program. For more information on the CMA® or CBA® Systematic Redemption Program, eligible shareholders should contact their Merrill Lynch Financial Consultant. The net investment income of each Fund is declared as dividends daily prior to the determination of the net asset value which is calculated after the close of business on the NYSE (generally, the NYSE closes at 4:00 p.m., Eastern time) on that day. The net investment income of a Fund for dividend purposes consists of interest earned on portfolio securities, less expenses, in each case computed since the most recent determination of net asset value. Expenses of a Fund, including the management fees and the account maintenance and distribution fees, are accrued daily. Dividends of net investment income are declared daily and reinvested monthly in the form of additional full and fractional shares of a Fund at net asset value as of the close of business on the payment date unless the shareholder elects to receive such dividends in cash. Shares will accrue dividends as long as they are issued and outstanding. Shares are issued and outstanding from the settlement date of a purchase order to the day prior to settlement date of a redemption order. All net realized capital gains of a Fund, if any, are declared and distributed to each Funds shareholders at least annually. Capital gain dividends will be reinvested automatically in shares of a Fund unless the shareholder elects to receive such distributions in cash. The per share dividends on each class of shares will be reduced as a result of any account maintenance, distribution and transfer agency fees applicable to that class. See Pricing of Shares Determination of Net Asset Value. See Shareholder Services for information as to how to elect either dividend reinvestment or cash payments. Portions of dividends which are taxable to shareholders as described below are subject to income tax whether they are reinvested in shares of a Fund or received in cash. The Trust intends to continue to qualify each Fund for the special tax treatment afforded regulated investment companies (RICs) under the Code. As long as it so qualifies, a Fund (but not its shareholders) will not be subject to Federal income tax to the extent that it distributes its net investment income and net realized capital gains. The Trust intends to cause each Fund to distribute substantially all of such income. As discussed in General Information Description of Shares, the Trust has established different series, each referred to as a Fund. Each Fund is treated as a separate corporation for Federal income tax purposes. Each Fund, therefore, is considered to be a separate entity in determining its treatment under the rules for RICs. Losses in one Fund do not offset gains in another Fund, and the requirements (other than certain organizational requirements) for qualifying for RIC status will be determined at the Fund level rather than at the Trust level. The Code requires a RIC to pay a nondeductible 4% excise tax to the extent the RIC does not distribute, during each calendar year, 98% of its ordinary income, determined on a calendar year basis, and 98% of its capital gains, determined, in general, on an October 31 year end, plus certain undistributed amounts from previous years. The required distributions, however, are based only on the taxable income of a RIC. The excise tax, therefore, generally will not apply to the tax-exempt income of a RIC, such as each Fund, that pays exempt-interest dividends. The Trust intends to qualify each Fund to pay exempt-interest dividends as defined in Section 852(b)(5) of the Code. Under such section if, at the close of each quarter of a Funds taxable year, at least 50% of the value of such Funds total assets consists of obligations exempt from Federal income tax (tax-exempt obligations) under Section 103(a) of the Code (relating generally to obligations of a state or local governmental unit), that Fund shall be qualified to pay exempt-interest dividends to its Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D |
37 |
39 |
transactions entered into by a Fund solely to reduce the risk of changes in price or interest rates with respect to its investments. Code Section 1092, which applies to certain straddles, may affect the taxation of a Funds sales of securities and transactions in financial futures contracts and related options. Under Section 1092, a Fund may be required to postpone recognition for tax purposes of losses incurred in certain sales of securities and certain closing transactions in financial futures contracts or the related options. The foregoing is a general and abbreviated summary of the applicable provisions of the Code and Treasury regulations. For the complete provisions, reference should be made to the pertinent Code sections and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder. The Code and the Treasury regulations are subject to change by legislative, judicial or administrative action either prospectively or retroactively. California. So long as, at the close of each quarter of the California Funds taxable year, at least 50% of the value of the Funds total assets consists of California Municipal Bonds, the portion of exempt-interest dividends paid from interest received by the Fund from California Municipal Bonds will not be subject to California income taxes. Shareholders subject to income taxation by states other than California may realize a lower after-tax rate of return than California shareholders since the dividends distributed by the California Fund may not be exempt, to any significant degree, from income taxation by such other states. However, exempt-interest dividends paid to a corporate shareholder subject to California state corporate franchise tax will be taxable as ordinary income. Distributions of long-term capital gains will be treated as capital gains which are taxed at ordinary income rates for California state income tax purposes. Florida. Prior to July 1, 1999, shares similar to shares in the Florida Fund were exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax if the funds portfolio consisted solely of assets exempt from the Florida intangible personal property tax. Under this provision, the Florida Fund has previously received a ruling from the Florida Department of Revenue that if, on the last business day of any calendar year, the Florida Funds assets consist solely of assets exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax, shares of the Florida Fund will be exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax in the following year. Effective July 1, 1999, the Florida Legislature revised this requirement so that the Florida Funds shares will be exempt if at least 90% of the net asset value of the portfolio of assets corresponding to the shares in the Florida Fund is invested in assets that are exempt from the Florida intangible personal property tax. The Florida Fund has applied for a ruling from the Florida Department of Revenue that if, on the last business day of any calendar year, at least 90% of the net asset value of the portfolio of assets corresponding to shares in the Florida Fund is invested in assets that are exempt from the tax, shares of the Florida Fund owned by Florida residents will be exempt from the Florida intangible personal property tax in the following year. Although there is no assurance that the Florida Department of Revenue will issue a favorable ruling on this issue, the Florida Department of Revenue has previously issued similar rulings. The Florida Department of Revenue has the authority to revoke or modify a previously issued ruling; however, if a ruling is revoked or modified, the revocation or modification is prospective only. Prior to the receipt of the ruling from the Florida Department of Revenue, the Florida Fund will rely on an opinion of Florida counsel for the Florida Fund, Holland & Knight LLP, stating that Florida Fund shares will be exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax if the revised asset requirement is met. This opinion is based on existing Florida law and interpretive authority which could be changed at any time retroactively. While the opinion represents the best judgment of Holland & Knight LLP, there is no guarantee that the legal conclusions will not be challenged by the Florida Department of Revenue or in judicial or administrative proceedings. Thus, under Florida counsels opinion or if a favorable ruling is issued, and if the revised requirement is met, shares of the Florida Fund owned by Florida residents will be exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax. Assets exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax include obligations of the State of Florida and its political subdivisions; obligations of the United States Government or its agencies; and cash. If shares of the Florida Fund are subject to Florida intangible personal property tax because less than 90% of the net asset value of the Florida Funds assets on the last business day of the previous calendar year consisted of assets exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax, only that portion of the value of Florida Fund shares equal to the portion of the net asset value of the Florida Fund that is attributable to obligations of the U.S. Government will be exempt from taxation. The Florida Fund anticipates that on the last business day of each calendar year at least 90% of the net |
40 |
asset value of the Florida Funds assets will consist of assets exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax. Dividends paid by the Florida Fund to individuals who are Florida residents are not subject to personal income taxation by Florida, because Florida does not impose a personal income tax. Distributions of investment income and capital gains by the Florida Fund will be subject to Florida corporate income tax, state taxes in states other than Florida and may be subject to local taxes. If the Florida Fund does not have a taxable nexus to Florida, such as through the location within the state of the Trusts or the Florida Funds activities or those of the Manager, under present Florida law, the Florida Fund is not subject to Florida corporate income taxation. Additionally, if the Florida Funds assets do not have a taxable situs in Florida as of January 1 of each calendar year, the Florida Fund will not be subject to Florida intangible personal property tax. If the Florida Fund has a taxable nexus to Florida or the Florida Funds assets have a taxable situs in Florida on January 1 of any year, the Florida Fund will be subject to Florida taxation. The above discussion is a general and abbreviated summary of the relevant state and local tax provisions presently in effect. Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisers regarding specific questions as to state or local taxes. From time to time each Fund may include its average annual total return and other total return data, as well as yield and tax-equivalent yield, in advertisements or information furnished to present or prospective shareholders. Total return, yield and tax-equivalent yield figures are based on a Funds historical performance and are not intended to indicate future performance. Average annual total return, yield and tax-equivalent yield are determined separately for Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares in accordance with formulas specified by the Commission. Average annual total return quotations for the specified periods are computed by finding the average annual compounded rates of return (based on net investment income and any realized and unrealized capital gains or losses on portfolio investments over such periods) that would equate the initial amount invested to the redeemable value of such investment at the end of each period. Average annual total return is computed assuming all dividends and distributions are reinvested and taking into account all applicable recurring and nonrecurring expenses, including the maximum sales charge in the case of Class A and Class D shares and the CDSC that would be applicable to a complete redemption of the investment at the end of the specified period in the case of Class B and Class C shares. Yield quotations will be computed based on a 30-day period by dividing (a) the net income based on the yield of each security earned during the period by (b) the average daily number of shares outstanding during the period that were entitled to receive dividends multiplied by the maximum offering price per share on the last day of the period. Tax equivalent yield quotations will be computed by dividing (a) the part of a Funds yield that is tax-exempt by (b) one minus a stated tax rate and (c) adding the result to that part, if any, of a Funds yield that is not tax-exempt. Each Fund also may quote annual, average annual and annualized total return and aggregate total return performance data, both as a percentage and as a dollar amount based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment, for various periods other than those noted below. Such data will be computed as described above, except that (1) as required by the periods of the quotations, actual annual, annualized or aggregate data, rather than average annual data, may be quoted and (2) the maximum applicable sales charges will not be included with respect to annual or annualized rates of return calculations. Aside from the impact on the performance data calculations of including or excluding the maximum applicable sales charges, actual annual or annualized total return data generally will be lower than average annual total return data since the average rates of return reflect compounding of return; aggregate total return data generally will be higher than average annual total return data since the aggregate rates of return reflect compounding over a longer period of time. Set forth below is total return, yield and tax-equivalent yield information for the Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares of each of the Funds for the periods indicated. |
41 |
California Fund |
Class A Shares
|
Class B Shares
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period
|
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
|||||
Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
One Year Ended July 31, 1999 | 1.17 | % | $1,011.70 | 0.94 | % | $1,009.40 | |||
Five Years Ended July 31, 1999 | 3.96 | % | $1,214.30 | 3.80 | % | $1,204.90 | |||
Inception (November 26, 1993) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 3.70 | % | $1,229.30 | 3.52 | % | $1,216.90 | |||
Annual Total Return (excluding maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Year Ended June 31, | |||||||||
1999 | 2.20 | % | $1,022.00 | 1.93 | % | $1,019.30 | |||
1998 | 2.96 | % | $1,029.60 | 2.59 | % | $1,025.90 | |||
1997 | 5.75 | % | $1,055.70 | 5.20 | % | $1,040.80 | |||
1996 | 4.56 | % | $1,045.60 | 4.08 | % | $1,040.80 | |||
1995 | 5.60 | % | $1,056.00 | 5.23 | % | $1,052.30 | |||
Inception (November 26, 1993) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1994 | 1.23 | % | $1,012.30 | 0.99 | % | $1,009.90 | |||
Aggregate Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Inception (November 26, 1993) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 22.93 | % | $1,229.30 | 21.69 | % | $1,216.90 | |||
Yield | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 2.41 | % | | 2.08 | % | | |||
Tax Equivalent Yield* | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 3.35 | % | | 2.89 | % | |
_____________________ |
* |
Based on a Federal income tax rate of 28%. |
Class C Shares
|
Class D Shares
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period
|
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
|||||
Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
One Year Ended July 31, 1999 | 1.13 | % | $1,011.30 | 1.17 | % | $1,011.70 | |||
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 4.21 | % | $1,217.90 | 4.14 | % | $1,213.60 | |||
Annual Total Return (excluding maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Year Ended June 31, | |||||||||
1999 | 2.12 | % | $1,021.20 | 2.20 | % | $1,022.00 | |||
1998 | 2.68 | % | $1,026.80 | 2.86 | % | $1,028.60 | |||
1997 | 5.39 | % | $1,053.90 | 5.47 | % | $1,054.70 | |||
1996 | 4.35 | % | $1,043.50 | 4.46 | % | $1,044.60 | |||
1995 | | | | | |||||
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1995 | 5.60 | % | $1,056.00 | 5.85 | % | $1,058.50 | |||
Aggregate Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Inception (November 26, 1993) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | | | | | |||||
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 21.79 | % | $1,217.90 | 21.36 | % | $1,213.60 | |||
Yield | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 2.27 | % | | 2.31 | % | | |||
Tax Equivalent Yield* | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 3.15 | % | | 3.21 | % | |
__________ |
* |
Based on a Federal income tax rate of 28%. |
42 |
Class A Shares
|
Class B Shares
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period
|
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
|||||
Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
One Year Ended July 31, 1999 | 0.99 | % | $1,009.90 | 0.56 | % | $1,005.60 | |||
Five Years Ended July 31, 1999 | 3.76 | % | $1,202.50 | 3.55 | % | $1,190.80 | |||
Inception (November 26, 1993) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 3.51 | % | $1,216.10 | 3.30 | % | $1,202.60 | |||
Annual Total Return (excluding maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Year Ended June 31, | |||||||||
1999 | 2.01 | % | $1,020.10 | 1.54 | % | $1,015.40 | |||
1998 | 3.17 | % | $1,031.70 | 2.80 | % | $1,028.00 | |||
1997 | 5.20 | % | $1,052.00 | 4.83 | % | $1,048.30 | |||
1996 | 3.45 | % | $1,034.50 | 3.08 | % | $1,030.80 | |||
1995 | 6.05 | % | $1,060.50 | 5.57 | % | $1,055.70 | |||
Inception (November 26, 1993) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1994 | 1.12 | % | $1,011.20 | 0.99 | % | $1,009.90 | |||
Aggregate Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Inception (November 26, 1993) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 21.61 | % | $1,216.10 | 20.26 | % | $1,202.60 | |||
Yield | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 2.68 | % | | 2.36 | % | | |||
Tax Equivalent Yield* | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 3.72 | % | | 3.28 | % | |
_____________________ |
* |
Based on a Federal income tax rate of 28%. |
Class C Shares
|
Class D Shares
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period
|
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
Expressed as a percentage based on a hypothetical $1,000 investment |
Redeemable Value of a hypothetical $1,000 investment at the end of the period |
|||||
Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
One Year Ended July 31, 1999 | 0.70 | % | $1,007.00 | 0.78 | % | $1,007.80 | |||
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 3.63 | % | $1,185.80 | 3.85 | % | $1,197.90 | |||
Annual Total Return (excluding maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Year Ended June 31, | |||||||||
1999 | 1.68 | % | $1,016.80 | 1.80 | % | $1,018.00 | |||
1998 | 2.65 | % | $1,026.50 | 3.17 | % | $1,031.70 | |||
1997 | 4.93 | % | $1,049.30 | 5.10 | % | $1,051.00 | |||
1996 | 2.48 | % | $1,024.80 | 3.35 | % | $1,033.50 | |||
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1995 | 5.65 | % | $1,056.50 | 6.07 | % | $1,060.70 | |||
Aggregate Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charges) |
|||||||||
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | |||||||||
July 31, 1999 | 18.58 | % | $1,185.80 | 19.79 | % | $1,197.90 | |||
Yield | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 2.55 | % | | 2.59 | % | | |||
Tax Equivalent Yield* | |||||||||
30 days ended July 31, 1999 | 3.54 | % | | 3.60 | % | |
__________ |
* |
Based on a Federal income tax rate of 28%. |
Name
|
Address
|
Percent of Class
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California Fund | Priscilla A. Ahern, Trustee Priscilla Allen Ahern Trust |
1310 East Balboa Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92661 |
22% Class A | ||||
Ann K. Hunter-Welborn and David A. Welborn, Trustees By Welborn Family Trust |
524 Meadowmist Court Olivenhain, CA 92024 |
14% Class A | |||||
Norman A. Meager, Trustee for the Meager Family Trust |
74743 Arroyo Drive Indian Wells, CA 92210 |
10% Class A | |||||
Cynthia R. Wallace
and Kirk Wallace, JTWROS |
1809 John Street Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 |
6.4% Class A | |||||
Barbara Dodd Menhinick, UAD Residual Trust |
P.O.Box 2051 Pebble Beach, CA 93953 |
5.3% Class A | |||||
Barbara Dodd Menhinick, Trustee |
P.O.Box 2051 Pebble Beach, CA 93953 |
5.1% Class A | |||||
Barbara H. Stebbins, Trustee | 601 Laurel Avenue #203 San Mateo, CA 94401 |
6.8% Class B | |||||
B.W. Duncan and Carol Duncan, JTWROS | 28780 Gleneagle Court Tehachapi, CA 93561 |
6.7% Class B | |||||
Ben Trainer | 121 Oak Drive San Rafael, CA 94901 |
5.9% Class B | |||||
Florence B. Joseph, Trustee The Florence B. Joseph Trust |
8132 Camino Del Sol #E La Jolla, CA 92037 |
5.5% Class B | |||||
John L. Love, Trustee UAD | P.O. Box 305 Pebble Beach, CA 93953 |
73% Class D | |||||
William J. Hume, Trustee |
600 Montgomery Street #2800 San Francisco, CA 94111 |
15.8% Class D |
46 |
Name
|
Address
|
Percent of Class
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Florida Fund | Connor Brown Company | P.O. Box 22 Ortega Station Jacksonville, FL 32210 |
12.6% Class A | ||||
Claude Nolan, Inc. | P.O. Box 22 Ortega Station Jacksonville, FL 32210 |
12.6% Class A | |||||
Nolan Brown Motors, Inc. | P.O. Box 22 Ortega Station Jacksonville, FL 32210 |
12.4% Class A | |||||
Roy A. Ballantyne and Shirley E. Ballantyne, JTWROS |
528 Woodview Drive Longwood, FL 32779 |
10.7% Class A | |||||
Roy A. Ballantyne, Trustee UAD 10/24/86 |
528 Woodview Drive Longwood, FL 32779 |
7.3% Class A | |||||
Shirley E. Ballantyne, Trustee UAD 10/24/86 |
528 Woodview Drive Longwood, FL 32779 |
7.3% Class A | |||||
Merrill Lynch Trust Company of America, Custodian Bloom, James Attn: Robert Bartl |
P.O. Box 30531 New Brunswick, NJ 08989 |
5.1% Class A | |||||
Edgewater View Ltd. Partnership Attn: Dr. Patrick Palumbo |
8801 Leesburg Pike Vienna, VA 22182 |
7.2% Class B | |||||
Molly E. Pigadis, Trustee UAD 5/15/89 |
401 East Linton Blvd. Delray Beach, FL 33483 |
5.3% Class B | |||||
William Lack and Frances Lack
JTWROS |
850 Ohlinger Road Babson Park, FL 33827 |
77.4% Class C | |||||
Mark S. Angle and Mercedes Angle, JTWROS |
533 S. Howard Ave. Tampa, FL 33606 |
20.6% Class C | |||||
Gale Young McBride | P.O. Box 9229 Fort Myers, FL 33902 |
40.1% Class D | |||||
Patricia J. Berg | P.O. Box 9227 Fort Myers, FL 33902 |
12.5% Class D | |||||
Merrill Lynch Trust Company, Custodian,
Mary E. Carlson Trust Custody Attn: Elizabeth Williams |
P.O. Box 30531 New Brunswick, NJ 08989 |
10.2% Class D | |||||
Merrill L. Bank, Helen S. Bank, Herbert M. Bank, Phyllis E. Bank, Trustees UAD 4/15/96 |
200 Bradlew Place Palm Beach, FL 33480 |
6.1% Class D | |||||
Robert C. Dukoff, Trustee U/A DTD 3/22/88 HBY Robert O. Dukoff |
P.O. Box 561002 Miami, FL 33256 |
5.9% Class D | |||||
1. The most significant feature of the 1998-99 budget was agreement on a total of $1.4 billion of tax cuts. The central element was a bill that provided for a phased-in reduction of the Vehicle License Fee (VLF). Since the VLF is transferred to cities and countries under existing law, the bill provided for the General Fund to replace the lost revenues. Starting on January 1, 1999, the VLF has been reduced by 25 percent, at a cost to the General Fund of approximately $500 million in the 1998-99 Fiscal Year and about $1 billion annually thereafter. |
I-1 In addition to the cut in VLF, the 1998-99 budget included both temporary and permanent increases in the personal income tax dependent credit ($612 million General Fund cost in 1998-99, but less in future years), a nonrefundable renters tax credit ($133 million), and various targeted business tax credits ($106 million). |
2. On November 8, 1998, voters of the State approved Proposition 98, a combined initiative constitutional amendment and statute called the Classroom Instructional Improvement and Accountability Act. Proposition 98 changed State funding of public education below the university level, primarily by guaranteeing K-14 schools a minimum share of General Fund revenues. Proposition 98 funding for K-14 schools was increased by $1.7 billion in General Fund moneys over revised 1997-98 levels, over $300 million higher than the minimum Proposition 98 guarantee. Of the 1998-99 funds, major new programs included money for instructional and library materials, deferred maintenance, support for increasing the school year to 180 days and reduction of class sizes in Grade 9. The Budget also included $250 million as repayment of prior years loans to schools, as part of the settlement of the California Teachers Association v. Gould lawsuit. That lawsuit, filed in 1992, requires that the State and K-14 schools share in repayment of prior years emergency loans to schools. |
3. Funding for higher education increased substantially above the actual 1997-98 level. General Fund support was increased by $340 million (15.6%) for the University of California and $267 million (14.1%) for the California State University system. In addition, Community Colleges funding increased by $300 million (6.6%). |
4. The Budget included increased funding for health, welfare and social services programs. A 4.9% grant increase was included in the basic welfare grants, the first increase in those grants on 9 years. |
5. Funding for the judiciary and criminal justice programs increased by about 11% over 1997-98, primarily to reflect increased State support for local trial courts and a rising prison population. |
6. Major legislation enacted after the 1998 Budget Act included new funding for resources projects, a share of the purchase of the Headwaters Forest, funding for the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank ($50 million) and funding for the construction of local jails. The State realized savings of $433 million from a reduction in the States contribution to the State Teachers Retirement System in 1998-99. |
The May Revision to the 1999-2000 Governors Budget (hereafter shortened to 1999-00), released on May 14, 1999 (the 1999 May Revision), reported that stronger than expected economic conditions in the State for the latter part of 1998 and into 1999 would produce total 1998-99 General Fund revenues of about $57.9 billion, almost $1.0 billion above the 1998 Budget Act estimates and $1.6 billion above the initial estimates in the January 1999-00 Governors Budget. The 1999 May Revision projects 1998-99 General Fund expenditures of $58.6 billion, about $400 million higher than the January 1999-00 Governors Budget estimate. Some of this additional revenue will be directed to K-14 schools under Proposition 98. Federal Welfare Reform. Congress passed and the President signed (on August 22, 1996) the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (the Law) making a fundamental reform of the current welfare system. Among many provisions, the Law includes: (i) a change of Aid to Families with Dependent Children from an entitlement program to a block grant titled Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), with lifetime time limits on TANF recipients, work requirements and other changes; (ii) provisions denying certain federal welfare and public benefits to legal noncitizens, allowing states to elect to deny additional benefits (including TANF) to legal noncitizens, and generally denying almost all benefits to illegal immigrants; and (iii) changes in the Food Stamp program, including reducing maximum benefits and imposing work requirements. As part of the 1997-98 Budget Act legislative package, the State Legislature and Governor agreed on a comprehensive reform of the States public assistance programs to implement the new federal Law. The new basic State welfare program is called California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act (CalWORKs), which replaces the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and Greater Avenues to Independence (GAIN) programs effective January 1, 1998. As required by the federal Law, CalWORKs contains new time limits on receipt of welfare aid, both lifetime as well as for any current time on aid. Administration of the new Welfare-to-Work programs will be largely at the county level, and counties are given financial incentives for success in this program. I-2 Although the longer-term impact of the new federal Law and CalWORKs cannot be determined until there has been more experience and until an independent evaluation of the CalWORKs program is completed. In the short-term, the CalWORKs program shows a continued trend of declining welfare caseloads. The CalWORKs caseload trend is projected to be 646,000 in 1998-99 and 602,000 in 1999-00, down from a high of 921,000 cases in 1994-95. The 1999 Budget Act proposes expenditures that will continue to meet, but not exceed, the federally-required $2.9 billion combined State and county maintenance-of-effort (MOE) requirement. Total CalWORKs-related expenditures are estimated to be $7.3 billion for 1998-99 and $7.3 billion for 1999-00, including child care transfer amounts for the Department of Education. Tobacco Litigation. In late 1998, the State signed a settlement agreement with the four major cigarette manufacturers, which was later ratified by a State court judge having jurisdiction over a pending lawsuit brought by the State against these companies. Under the settlement, the companies will pay California governments a total of approximately $25 billion over a period of 25 years. Under the States settlement, half of these moneys will be paid to the State, and half to local governments (cities and counties). The specific amount to be received by the State and local governments is, however, subject to adjustment for a number of reasons. First, the federal government has indicated that it may seek recovery of part of the states settlement as reimbursement for federal Medicaid funding in prior years. Second, various details in the settlement allow reduction of the companies payments because of events such as certain federal government actions, reductions in cigarette sales, or bankruptcy of any settling companies. 1999-00 Fiscal Year Budget. On January 8, 1999, Governor Davis released his proposed budget for fiscal year 1999-00 (the January Governors Budget). The January Governors Budget generally reported that General Fund revenues for fiscal year 1998-99 and fiscal year 1999-00 would be lower than earlier projections (primarily due to weaker overseas economic conditions perceived in the late 1998), while some caseloads would be higher than earlier projections. The January Governors Budget proposed $60.5 billion of General Fund expenditures in fiscal year 1999-00, with a $415 million SFEU reserve or budget reserve at June 30, 2000. The 1999 May Revision showed an additional $4.3 billion of revenues for combined fiscal years 1998-99 and 1999-00. The Legislature enacted the 1999 Budget Act in a timely fashion, meeting the Constitutional deadline for budget enactment for only the second time in the 1990's. The final 1999 Budget Act estimated General Fund revenues and transfers of $63.0 billion, and contained expenditures totaling $63.7 billion after the Governor used his line-item veto to reduce the legislative Budget Bill expenditures by $581 million (both General Fund and Special Fund). The 1999 Budget Act also contained expenditures of $16.1 billion from special funds and $1.5 billion from bond funds. The Administration estimated that the budget reserve would have a balance at June 30, 2000, of about $881 million. Not included in this amount was an additional $300 million that (after the Governors vetoes) was set aside to provide funds for employee salary increases (to be negotiated in bargaining with employee unions), and for litigation reserves. There should be normal cash flow borrowing during the fiscal year. The principal features of the 1999 Budget Act include the following: |
1. Proposition 98 funding for K-12 schools was increased by $1.6 billion in General Fund moneys over revised 1998-99 levels, $108.6 million higher than the minimum Proposition 98 guarantee. Of the 1999-00 funds, major new programs included money for reading improvement, new textbooks, school safety, improving teacher quality, funding teacher bonuses, providing greater accountability for school performance, increasing preschool and after school care programs and funding deferred maintenance of school facilities. The Budget also includes $310 million as repayment of prior years loans to schools, as part of the settlement of the California Teachers Association v. Gould lawsuit. |
2. Funding for higher education increased substantially above the actual 1998-99 level. General Fund support was increased by $184 million (7.3%) for the University of California (UC) and $126 million (5.9%) for the California State University (CSU) system. In addition, Community Colleges funding increased by $324.3 million (6.6%). As a result, undergraduate fees at UC and CSU will be reduced for the second consecutive year, and the per-unit charge at Community Colleges will be reduced by $1. |
I-3 |
3. The Budget included increased funding of nearly $600 million for health and human service. |
4. About $800 million from the General Fund will be directed toward infrastructure costs, including $425 million in additional funding for the Infrastructure Bank, intitial planning costs for a new prison in the Central Valley, additional equipment for train and ferry service, and payment of deferred maintenance for state parks. |
5. The Legislature enacted a one-year additional reduction of 10 percent of the Vehicle License Fee for calendar year 2000, at a General Fund cost of about $250 million in each of fiscal year 1999-00 and 2000-01 to make up lost funding to local governments. Conversion of this one-time reduction to a permanent cut will remain subject to the revenue tests in the legislation adopted last year. Several other targeted tax cuts, primarily for businesses, were also approved, at a cost of $54 million in 1999-00. |
6. A one-time appropriation of $150 million, to be split between cities and counties, was made to offset property tax shifts during the early 1990's. Additionally, an ongoing $50 million will be given to cities for jail booking or processing fees charged by counties when an individual arrested by city personnel is taken to a county detention facility. |
Local GovernmentsThe primary units of local government in California are the counties, ranging in population from 1,200 (Alpine) to over 9,600,000 (Los Angeles). Counties are responsible for providing many basic services, including indigent healthcare, welfare, courts, jails and public safety in unincorporated areas. There are also about 470 incorporated cities and thousands of other special districts formed for education, utility and other services. The fiscal condition of local governments has been constrained since the enactment of Proposition 13 in 1978, which reduced and limited the future growth of property taxes and limited the ability of local governments to impose special taxes (those devoted to a specific purpose) without two-thirds voter approval. Counties, in particular, have had fewer options to raise revenues than many other local governmental entities, and have been required to maintain many services. In the aftermath of Proposition 13, the State provided aid from the general fund to make up some of the loss of property tax moneys, including taking over the principal responsibility for funding local K-12 schools and community colleges. During the recession, the Legislature eliminated remnants of this post-Proposition 13 aid to entities other than K-14 education districts, although it has also provided additional funding sources (such as sales taxes) and reduced requirements for local services. Since then the State has also provided additional funding to counties and cities through such programs as health and welfare realignment, welfare reform, trial court restructuring, an annual program supporting local public safety departments, and various other measures. In his 1999-00 Budget Proposal, the Governor has proposed a review and accounting of state - local fiscal relationships, with the goal of ultimately restoring local government finances to an equivalent fiscal condition to the period prior to the 1991-93 recession - induced tax shifts. Litigation has been brought challenging the legality of the property tax shifts from counties to schools. The 1999 Budget Act includes a $150 million one-time grant of money from the General Fund to local agencies for relief from the 1992 and 1993 property tax shifts. Legislation has been passed, subject to voter approval at the election in November, 2000, to provide a more permanent payment to local governments to offset the property tax shift. In addition, legislation was enacted in 1999 to provide annually up to $50 million relief to cities based on 1997-98 costs of jail booking and processing fees paid to counties. The entire statewide welfare system has been changed in response to the change in federal welfare law enacted in 1996 (see Federal Welfare Reform above). Under the CalWORKs program, counties are given flexibility to develop their own plans, consistent with State law, to implement Welfare-to-Work and to administer many of its elements and their costs for administrative and support services are capped at 1996-97 levels. Counties are also given financial incentives if, at the individual county level or statewide, the CalWORKs program produces savings associated with specified Welfare-to-Work outcomes; counties may also suffer penalties for failing to meet federal standards. Under CalWORKs, counties will still be required to provide general assistance aid to certain persons who cannot obtain welfare from other programs. I-4 Historically, funding for the States trial court system was divided between the State and the counties. However, Chapter 850, Statutes of 1997, restructured the States trial court funding system. Funding for the courts, costs for facilities, local judicial benefits, and revenue collection, was consolidated at the State level. County contribution for both their general fund and fine and penalty amounts is capped at the 1994-95 level and becomes part of the Trial Court Trust Fund, which supports all trial court operations. The State assumed responsibility for future growth in trial court funding. The consolidation of funding is intended to streamline the operation of the courts, provide a dedicated revenue source, and relieve fiscal pressure on the counties. Beginning in 1998-99, county general fund contribution for court operations is reduced by $300 million, and cities will retain $62 million in fine and penalty revenue previously remitted to the State; the General Fund reimbursed the $362 million revenue loss to the Trial Court Trust Fund. The 1999 Budget Act includes funds to further reduce the county general fund contribution by an additional $96 million by reducing by 100 percent the contributions of the next 18 smallest counties and by 10 percent the general fund contribution of the remaining 21 counties. On November 5, 1996, voters approved Proposition 218, called the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which adds new Articles XIIIC and XIIID into the California Constitution. These new provisions enact limits on the ability of local government agencies to impose or raise various taxes, fees, charges and assessments without voter approval. Certain general taxes imposed after January 1, 1995 must be approved by voters in order to remain in effect. In addition, Article XIIIC clarifies the right of local voters to reduce taxes, fees, and assessments to changes through local initiatives. There are a number of ambiguities concerning the Proposition and its impact on local governments and their bonded debt that will require interpretation by the courts or the State Legislature. The State Legislature Analyst estimated that enactment of Proposition 218 would reduce local government revenues statewide by over $100 million a year, and that over time revenues to local government would be reduced by several hundred million dollars. Proposition 218 does not affect the State or its ability to levy or collect taxes. On December 23, 1997, a consortium of California counties filed a test claim with the Commission on State Mandates (the Commission) asking the Commission to determine whether the property tax shift from counties to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, which is a funding source for schools, is a reimbursable state mandated cost. On August 11, 1998, the State Department of Justice, on behalf of the State Department of Finance, filed a rebuttal in opposition to the counties claim. The test claim was heard on October 29, 1998, and the Commission on State Mandates found in favor of the State. In March, 1999, Sonoma County filed suit in the Superior Court to overturn the Commissions decision. The State is contesting this lawsuit. Should the courts find in favor of the counties, the impact to the State General Fund could be as high as $10.0 billion with an annual Proposition 98 General Fund cost of at least $3.6 billion. This cost would grow in accordance with the annual assessed value growth rate. Constitutional and Statutory Limitations; Recent and Pending Initiatives; Pending Legislation Constitutional and Statutory Limitations. Article XIIIA of the California Constitution (which resulted from the voter-approved Proposition 13 in 1978) limits the taxing powers of California public agencies, Article XIIIA, provides that the maximum ad valorem tax on real property cannot exceed 1% of the full cash value of the property and effectively prohibits the levying of any other ad valorem tax on real property for general purposes. However, on May 3, 1986, Proposition 46, an amendment to Article XIIIA, was approved by the voters of the State of California, creating a new exemption under Article XIIIA permitting an increase in ad valorem taxes on real property in excess of 1% for bonded indebtedness approved by two-thirds of the voters voting on the proposed indebtedness, Full cash value is defined as the County Assessors valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-76 Fiscal Year tax bill under full cash value or, thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment. The full cash value is subject to annual adjustment to reflect increases (not to exceed 2%) or decreases in the consumer price index or comparable local data, or to reflect reductions in property value caused by damage, destruction or other factors. Article XIIIB of the California Constitution limits the amount of appropriations of the State and of the local governments to the amount of appropriations of the entity for the prior year, adjusted for changes in the cost of living, population and the services that local government has financial responsibility for providing. To the extent that the revenues of the State and/or local government exceed its appropriations, the excess revenues must be I-5 rebated to the public either directly or through a tax decrease. Expenditures for voter-approved debt services are not included in the appropriations limit. At the November 9, 1988 general election, California voters approved an initiative known as Proposition 98. Under Proposition 98 (as modified by Proposition 111, which was enacted on June 5, 1990), K-14 schools are guaranteed the greater of (a) in general, a fixed percent of General Fund revenues (Test 1), (b) the amount appropriated to K-14 schools in the prior year, adjusted for changes in the cost of living (measured as in Article XIII B by reference to State per capita personal income) and enrollment (Test 2), or (c) a third test, which would replace Test 2 in any year when the percentage growth in per capita General Fund revenues from the prior year plus one half of one percent is less than the percentage growth in State per capita personal income (Test 3). Under Test 3, schools would receive the amount appropriated in the prior year adjusted for changes in enrollment and per capita General Fund revenues, plus an additional small adjustment factor. If Test 3 is used in any year, the difference between Test 3 and Test 2 would become a credit to schools which would be the basis of payments in future years when per capita General Fund revenue growth exceeds per capita personal income growth. Legislation adopted prior to the end of the 1998-89 Fiscal Year, implementing Proposition 98, determined the K-14 schools funding guarantee under Test 1 to be 40.3 percent of General Fund tax revenues, based on 1986-87 appropriations. However, that percent has been adjusted to approximately 35 percent to account for a subsequent redirection of local property taxes, since such redirection directly affects the share of General Fund revenues to schools. Proposition 98 permits the Legislature by two-thirds vote of both houses, with the Governors concurrence, to suspend the K-14 schools minimum funding formula for a one-year period. Proposition 98 also contains provisions transferring certain State tax revenues in excess of the Article XIII B limit to K-14 schools. During the recession in the early 1990s, General Fund revenues for several years were less than originally projected, so that the original Proposition 98 appropriations turned out to be higher than the minimum percentage provided in the law. The Legislature responded to these developments by designating the extra Proposition 98 payments in one year as a loan from future years Proposition 98 entitlements and also intended that the extra payments would not be included in the Proposition 98 base for calculating future years entitlements. By implementing these actions, per-pupil funding from Proposition 98 sources stayed almost constant at approximately $4,220 from the 1991-92 fiscal year to the 1993-94 fiscal year. In 1992, a lawsuit was filed, called California Teachers Association v Gould, which challenged the validity of these off-budget loans. The settlement of this case, finalized in July, 1996, provides, among other things, that both the State and K-14 schools share in the repayment of prior years emergency loans to schools. Of the total $1.76 billion in loans, the State will repay $935 million by forgiveness of the amount owed, while schools will repay $825 million. The State share of the repayment will be reflected as an appropriation above the current Proposition 98 base calculation. The schools share of the repayment will count either as appropriations that count toward satisfying the Proposition 98 guarantee, or as appropriations from below the current base. Repayments are spread over the eight-year period of the 1994-95 fiscal year through the 2001-02 fiscal year to reduce any adverse fiscal impact. Substantially increased general fund revenues, above initial budget projections, in the 1994-95 to 1998-99 fiscal years have resulted in retroactive increases in Proposition 98 appropriations from subsequent fiscal years budgets. Because of the States increasing revenues, per-pupil funding at the K-12 level has increased by about 44 percent from the level in place from 1991-92 through 1993-94, and is estimated at about $6,025 per the average daily attendance rate of students in 1999-00. A significant amount of the extra Proposition 98 monies in the last few years has been allocated to special programs, most particularly an initiative to allow each classroom from grades K-3 to have no more than 20 pupils by the end of the 1997-98 school year. Furthermore, since General Fund revenue growth is expected to continue in 1999-00, there are also new initiatives to increase school safety, improve schools accountability for pupil performance, provide additional textbooks to schools, fund deferred maintenance projects, increase beginning teachers salaries and provide performance incentives to teachers. On November 8, 1994, the voters approved Proposition 187, an initiative statute (Proposition 187). Proposition 187 specifically prohibits funding by the State of social services, health care services and public school education for the benefit of any person not verified as either a United States citizen or a person legally admitted to the United States. Among the provisions in Proposition 187 pertaining to public school education, I-6 the measure requires, commencing January 1, 1995, that every school district in the State verify the legal status of every child enrolling in the district for the first time. By January 1, 1996, each school district must also verify the legal status of children already enrolled in the district and of all parents or guardians of all students. If the district reasonably suspects that a student, parent or guardian is not legally in the United States, that district must report the student to the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service and certain other parties. The measure also prohibits a school district from providing education to a student it does not verify as either a United States citizen or a person legally admitted to the United States. Opponents of Proposition 187 filed at least eight lawsuits (which were subsequently consolidated) challenging the constitutionality and validity of the measure. On March 18, 1998, a United States District Court judge entered as final judgment in the case, holding key portions of the measure unconstitutional and permanently enjoining the State from implementing those sections which would have required law enforcement, teachers and social services and health care workers to verify a persons immigration status and subsequently report illegal immigrants to authorities and deny them social services, health care and education benefits. An appeal by the State Attorney General was filed with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on March 25, 1998. Governor Gray Davis subsequently asked the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal to serve as mediator on the issue. On April 26, 1999, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal granted Governor Davis request for mediation of the controversy. In response, David E. Lombardi, Chief Mediator for the Ninth Circuit Mediation Office ordered a stay until June 18, 1999 of all appellate proceedings in connection with the six cases then pending before the Court of Appeal involving Proposition 187 challenges. On June 1, 1999, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association sued Governor Davis in the California Supreme Court challenging Governor Davis right to submit Proposition 187 to mediation, which the plaintiff claims undermines the publics right of initiative. On June 30, 1999, the California Supreme Court declined to hear the case. Since that time, Governor Davis had the States appeal withdrawn, letting stand the District Court rulings. State Appropriations Limit The State is subject to an annual appropriations limit imposed by Article XIII B of the State Constitution (the Appropriations Limit). The Appropriations Limit does not restrict appropriations to pay debt service on voter-authorized bonds. Article XIII B prohibits the State from spending appropriations subject to limitation in excess of the Appropriations Limit. Appropriations subject to limitation, for the State, are authorizations to spend proceeds of taxes, which consist of tax revenues, and certain other funds, including proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges or other fees to the extent that such proceeds exceed the cost reasonably borne by that entity in providing the regulation, product or service, but proceeds of taxes exclude most state aid to local governments, tax refunds and some benefit payments such as unemployment insurance. No limit is imposed on appropriations of funds which are not proceeds of taxes, such as reasonable user charges or fees and certain other non-tax funds. Not included in the Appropriations Limit are appropriations for the debt service costs of bonds existing or authorized by January 1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, appropriations required to comply with mandates of courts or the federal government, appropriations for qualified capital outlay projects, appropriations of revenues derived from any increase in gasoline taxes and motor vehicle weight fees above January 1, 1990 levels, and appropriation of certain special taxes imposed by initiative (e.g. cigarette and tobacco taxes). The Appropriations Limit may also be exceeded in cases of emergency. The States Appropriations Limit in each year is based on the limit for the prior year, adjusted annually for changes in state per capita personal income and changes in population, and adjusted, when applicable, for any transfer of financial responsibility of providing services to or from another unit of government or any transfer of the financial source for the provisions of services from tax proceeds to non tax proceeds. The measurement of change in population is a blended average of statewide overall population growth, and change in attendance at local school and community college (K-14) districts. The Appropriations Limit is tested over consecutive two-year periods. Any excess of the aggregate proceeds of taxes received over such two-year period above the combined Appropriations Limits for those two years is divided equally between transfers to K-14 districts and refunds to taxpayers. I-7 The Legislature has enacted legislation to implement Article XIIIB which defines certain terms used in Article XIII B and sets forth the methods for determining the Appropriations Limit. California Government Code Section 7912 requires an estimate of the Appropriations Limit to be included in the Governors Budget, and thereafter to be subject to the budget process and established in the Budget Act. The following table shows the States Appropriations Limit for the past four fiscal years and the current fiscal year. As of the enactment of the 1999-00 Budget, the Department of Finance projects the States Appropriations Subject to Limitations will be $6.1 billion under the States Appropriations Limit in Fiscal Year 1999-00. States Appropriations Limit
|
Fiscal Years
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1995-96
|
1996-97
|
1997-98
|
1998-99*
|
1999-00*
|
|||||||
State Appropriations Limit | $ 39,309 | $ 42,002 | $ 44,778 | $ 47,573 | $ 50,673 | ||||||
Appropriations Subject to Limit | (34,186 | ) | (35,103 | ) | (40,743 | ) | (42,674 | ) | (44,528 | ) | |
Amount (Over)/Under Limit | $ 5,123 | $ 6,899 | $ 4,035 | $ 4,899 | $ 6,145 |
__________
* |
Estimated/Projected |
SOURCE: State of California, Department of Finance. |
1997-98
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
Actual
|
|||
General Revenue Fund: | |||
Sales Tax-GR | $ 11,828 | .7 | |
Beverage Tax & Licenses | 550 | .1 | |
Corporate Income Tax | 1,395 | .7 | |
Documentary Stamp Tax | 429 | .6 | |
Cigarette Tax | 142 | .1 | |
Insurance Premium Tax | 295 | .5 | |
Pari-Mutuels Tax | 25 | .6 | |
Intangibles Tax | 756 | .0 | |
Estate Tax | 595 | .0 | |
Interest Earnings | 217 | .9 | |
Public Safety Licenses | 61 | .2 | |
Medical & Hospital Fees | 99 | .8 | |
Motor Vehicle Charges | 41 | .3 | |
Auto Title & Lien Fees | 24 | .0 | |
Severance Taxes | 35 | .4 | |
Service Charges | 383 | .8 | |
Other Taxes, Licenses & Fees | 262 | .5 | |
Less: Refunds | (204 | .6) | |
|
|||
Net General Revenue: | $ 16,939 | .4 | |
Executive Office of
the Governor Revenue and Economic Analysis March 8, 1999 |
Aaa |
Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as gilt edged. Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues. |
Aa |
Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term risk appears somewhat larger than in Aaa securities. |
A |
Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as upper medium grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future. |
Baa |
Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade obligations, (i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured). Interest payment and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as well. |
Ba |
Bonds which are rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and thereby not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds in this class. |
B |
Bonds which are rated B generally lack characteristics of the desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may be small. |
Caa |
Bonds which are rated Caa are of poor standing. Such issues may be in default or there may be present elements of danger with respect to principal or interest. |
Ca |
Bonds which are rated Ca represent obligations which are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are often in default or have other marked shortcomings. |
C |
Bonds which are rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds, and issues so rated can be regarded as having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing. |
Note: Those bonds in the Aa, A, Baa, Ba and B groups which Moodys believes possess the strongest investment attributes are designated by the symbols Aa1, A1, Baa1, Ba1 and B1. Short Term Notes: The three ratings of Moodys for short-term notes are MIG 1/VMIG 1, MIG 2/VMIG 2 and MIG 3/VMIG 3; MIG 1/VMIG 1 denotes best quality strong protection from established cash flows; MIG 2/VMIG 2 denotes high quality with ample margins of protection; MIG 3/VMIG 3 instruments are of favorable quality but lacking the undeniable strength of the preceding grades. Description of Moodys Commercial Paper RatingsMoodys Commercial Paper ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to repay punctually promissory obligations not having an original maturity in excess of nine months. Moodys employs the following three designations, all judged to be investment grade, to indicate the relative repayment capacity of rated issuers: III-1 Issuers rated Prime-1 (or supporting institutions) have a superior ability for repayment of short-term promissory obligations. Prime-1 repayment ability will often be evidenced by many of the following characteristics: leading market positions in well established industries; high rates of return on funds employed; conservative capitalization structures with moderate reliance on debt and ample asset protection; broad margins in earning coverage of fixed financial charges and high internal cash generation; and well established access to a range of financial markets and assured sources of alternate liquidity. Issuers rated Prime-2 (or supporting institutions) have a strong ability for repayment of short-term promissory obligations. This will normally be evidenced by many of the characteristics cited above but to a lesser degree. Earnings trends and coverage ratios, while sound, may be more subject to variation. Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate, may be more affected by external conditions. Ample alternate liquidity is maintained. Issuers rated Prime-3 (or supporting institutions) have an acceptable ability for repayment of short-term promissory obligations. The effects of industry characteristics and market composition may be more pronounced. Variability in earnings and profitability may result in changes to the level of debt protection measurements and may require relatively high financial leverage. Adequate alternate liquidity is maintained. Issuers rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories. Description of Standard & Poors, a Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (Standard & Poors), Municipal Debt RatingsA Standard & Poors municipal debt rating is a current opinion of the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations or a specific program. It takes into consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers, or other forms of credit enhancement on the obligation. The debt rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold a financial obligation, inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. The ratings are based on current information furnished by the obligors or obtained by Standard & Poors from other sources Standard & Poors considers reliable. Standard & Poors does not perform an audit in connection with any rating and may, on occasion, rely on unaudited financial information. The ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information, or based on circumstances. The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations: |
I. |
Likelihood of payment capacity and willingness of the obligor as to the timely payment of interest and repayment of principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation; |
II. |
Nature of and provisions of the obligation; |
III. |
Protection afforded to, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors rights. |
AAA |
Debt rated AAA has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poors. Capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong. |
AA |
Debt rated AA differs from the highest rated issues only in small degree. The Obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong. |
A |
Debt rated A is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt in higher-rated categories. However, the obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong. |
BBB |
Debt rated BBB exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
III-2 |
BB B CCC CC C |
Debt rated BB, B, CCC, CC and C are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. BB indicates the least degree of speculation and C the highest degree of speculation.While such debt will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. |
D |
Debt rated D is in payment default. The D rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless Standard & Poors believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. The D rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized. |
Plus (+) or Minus (-): The ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories. Description of Standard & Poors Commercial Paper RatingsA Standard & Poors commercial paper rating is a current assessment of the likelihood of timely payment of debt having an original maturity of no more than 365 days. Ratings are graded into several categories, ranging from A-1" for the highest-quality obligations to D for the lowest. These categories are as follows: |
A-1 |
This designation indicates that the degree of safety regarding timely payment is strong. Those issues determined to possess extremely strong safety characteristics are denoted with a plus sign (+) designation. |
A-2 |
Capacity for timely payment on issues with this designation is satisfactory. However, the relative degree of safety is not as high as for issues designated A-1. |
A-3 |
Issues carrying this designation have an adequate capacity for timely payment. They are, however, more vulnerable to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances than obligations carrying the higher designations. |
B |
Issues rated B are regarded as having only speculative capacity for timely payment. |
C |
This rating is assigned to short-term debt obligations with a doubtful capacity for payment. |
D |
Debt rated D is in payment default. The D rating category is used when interest payments or principal payments are not made on the date due, even if the applicable grace period has not expired unless Standard & Poors believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. |
A commercial paper rating is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a security. The ratings are based on current information furnished to Standard & Poors by the issuer or obtained by Standard & Poors from other sources it considers reliable. The ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information. A Standard & Poors note rating reflects the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to notes. Notes due in three years or less will likely receive a note rating. Notes maturing beyond three years will most likely receive a long-term debt rating. The following criteria will be used in making that assessment. |
|
Amortization schedule the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note. |
|
Source of payment the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note. |
Note rating symbols are as follows: |
SP-1 |
Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation. |
SP-2 |
Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes. |
SP-3 |
Speculative capacity to pay principal and interest. |
III-3 |
c |
The c subscript is used to provide additional information to investors that the bank may terminate its obligation to purchase tendered bonds if the long-term credit rating of the issuer is below an investment-grade level and/or the issuers bonds are deemed taxable. |
p |
The letter p indicates that the rating is provisional. A provisional rating assumes the successful completion of the project financed by the debt being rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements is largely or entirely dependent upon the successful, timely completion of the project. This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to completion of the project, makes no comment on the likelihood of or the risk of default upon failure of such completion. The investor should exercise his own judgment with respect to such likelihood and risk. |
* |
Continuance of the ratings is contingent upon Standard & Poors receipt of an executed copy of the escrow agreement or closing documentation confirming investments and cash flows. |
r |
The r highlights derivative, hybrid, and certain other obligations that Standard & Poors believes may experience high volatility or high variability in expected returns as a result of noncredit risks. Examples of such obligations are securities with principal or interest return indexed to equities, commodities, or currencies; certain swaps and options, and interest-only and principal-only mortgage securities. The absence of an r symbol should not be taken as an indication that an obligation will exhibit no volatility or variability in total return. |
Description of Fitch IBCA, Inc.s (Fitch) Investment Grade Bond RatingsFitch investment grade bond ratings provide a guide to investors in determining the credit risk associated with a particular security. The rating represents Fitchs assessment of the issuers ability to meet the obligations of a specific debt issue or class of debt in a timely manner. The rating takes into consideration special features of the issue, its relationship to other obligations of the issuer, the current and prospective financial condition and operating performance of the issuer and any guarantor, as well as the economic and political environment that might affect the issuers future financial strength and credit quality. Fitch ratings do not reflect any credit enhancement that may be provided by insurance policies or financial guarantees unless otherwise indicated. Bonds carrying the same rating are of similar but not necessarily identical credit quality since the rating categories do not fully reflect small differences in the degrees of credit risk. Fitch ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect of any security. Fitch ratings are based on information obtained from issuers, other obligors, underwriters, their experts, and other sources Fitch believes to be reliable. Fitch does not audit or verify the truth or accuracy of such information. Ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of changes in, or the unavailability of, information or for other reasons. |
AAA |
Bonds considered to be investment grade and of the highest credit quality. The obligor has an exceptionally strong ability to pay interest and repay principal, which is unlikely to be affected by reasonably foreseeable events. |
AA |
Bonds considered to be investment grade and of very high credit quality. The obligors ability to pay interest and repay principal is very strong, although not quite as strong as bonds rated AAA. Because bonds rated in the AAA and AA categories are not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable future developments, short-term debt of these issuers is generally rated F-1+. |
A |
Bonds considered to be investment grade and of high credit quality. The obligors ability to pay interest and repay principal is considered to be strong, but may be more vulnerable to adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances than bonds with higher ratings. |
III-4 |
BBB |
Bonds considered to be investment grade and of satisfactory-credit quality. The obligors ability to pay interest and repay principal is considered to be adequate. Adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, however, are more likely to have adverse impact on these bonds, and therefore impair timely payment. The likelihood that the ratings of these bonds will fall below investment grade is higher than for bonds with higher ratings. |
Plus (+) or Minus (-): Plus and minus signs are used with a rating symbol to indicate the relative position of a credit within the rating category. Plus and minus signs, however, are not used in the AAA category. |
NR |
Indicates that Fitch does not rate the specific issue. |
Conditional |
A conditional rating is premised on the successful completion of a project or the occurrence of a specific event. |
Suspended |
A rating is suspended when Fitch deems the amount of information available from the issuer to be inadequate for rating purposes. |
Withdrawn |
A rating will be withdrawn when an issue matures or is called or refinanced and, at Fitchs discretion, when an issuer fails to furnish proper and timely information. |
Fitch Alert |
Ratings are placed on FitchAlert to notify investors of an occurrence that is likely to result in a rating change and the likely direction of such change. These are designated as Positive, indicating a potential upgrade, Negative, for potential downgrade, or Evolving, where ratings may be raised or lowered. FitchAlert is relatively short-term, and should be resolved within 12 months. |
Ratings Outlook: An outlook is used to describe the most likely direction of any rating change over the intermediate term. It is described as Positive or Negative. The absence of a designation indicates a stable outlook. Description of Fitchs Speculative Grade Bond RatingsFitch speculative grade bond ratings provide a guide to investors in determining the credit risk associated with a particular security. The ratings (BB to C) represent Fitchs assessment of the likelihood of timely payment of principal and interest in accordance with the terms of obligation for bond issues not in default. For defaulted bonds, the rating (DDD to D) is an assessment of the ultimate recovery value through reorganization or liquidation. The rating takes into consideration special features of the issue, its relationship to other obligations of the issuer, the current and prospective financial condition and operating performance of the issuer and any guarantor, as well as the economic and political environment that might affect the issuers future financial strength. Bonds that have the same rating are of similar but not necessarily identical credit quality since rating categories cannot fully reflect the differences in degrees of credit risk. |
BB |
Bonds are considered speculative. The obligors ability to pay interest and repay principal may be affected over time by adverse economic changes. However, business and financial alternatives can be identified which could assist the obligor in satisfying its debt service requirements. |
B |
Bonds are considered highly speculative. While bonds in this class are currently meeting debt service requirements, the probability of continued timely payment of principal and interest reflects the obligors limited margin of safety and the need for reasonable business and economic activity throughout the life of the issue. |
CCC |
Bonds have certain identifiable characteristics which, if not remedied, may lead to default. The ability to meet obligations requires an advantageous business and economic environment. |
CC |
Bonds are minimally protected. Default in payment of interest and/or principal seems probably over time. |
C |
Bonds are in imminent default in payment of interest or principal. |
III-5 |
DDD |
Bonds are in default on interest and/or principal payments. Such bonds are extremely speculative and |
DD |
should be valued on the basis of their ultimate recovery value in liquidation or reorganization of the |
D |
obligor. DDD represents the highest potential for recovery on these bonds, and D represents the lowest potential for recovery. |
Plus (+) or Minus (-): Plus and minus signs are used with a rating symbol to indicate the relative position of a credit within the rating category. Plus and minus signs, however, are not used in the DDD, DD, or D categories. Description of Fitchs Short-Term RatingsFitchs short-term ratings apply to debt obligations that are payable on demand or have original maturities of up to three years, including commercial paper, certificates of deposit, medium-term notes, and municipal and investment notes. The short-term ratings place greater emphasis than a long-term rating on the existence of liquidity necessary to meet the issuers obligations in a timely manner. Fitch short-term ratings are as follows: |
F-1+ |
Exceptionally Strong Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating are regarded as having the strongest degree of assurance for timely payment. |
F-1 |
Very Strong Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating reflect an assurance of timely payment only slightly less in degree than issues rated F-1+. |
F-2 |
Good Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating have a satisfactory degree of assurance for timely payment, but the margin of safety is not as great as for issues assigned F-1+ and F-1 ratings. |
F-3 |
Fair Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating have characteristics suggesting that the degree of assurance for timely payment is adequate; however, near-term adverse changes could cause these securities to be rated below investment grade. |
F-S |
Weak Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating have characteristics suggesting a minimal degree of assurance for timely payment and are vulnerable to near-term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions. |
D |
Default. Issues assigned this rating are in actual or imminent payment default. |
LOC |
The symbol LOC indicates that the rating is based on a letter of credit issued by a commercial bank. |
III-6 Code #: 16926-11-99 PART C. OTHER INFOMRATIONITEM 23. Exhibits |
Exhibit Number |
Description
|
||
---|---|---|---|
1 | (a)(1) | | Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Registrant, dated November 15, 1993.(d) |
(a)(2) | | Certificate of Amendment to Declaration of Trust and Establishment and Designation of Classes, dated October 17, 1994.(g) | |
(b)(1) | | Instrument establishing Merrill Lynch California Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund (the California Fund) as a Series of the Registrant.(a) | |
(b)(2) | | Instrument establishing Merrill Lynch Florida Limited Maturity Municipal Bond Fund (the Florida Fund) as a Series of the Registrant.(a) | |
(c)(1) | | Instrument establishing Class A shares and Class B shares of beneficial interest of the California Fund.(a) | |
2 | | By-Laws of the Registrant.(d) | |
3 | | Portions of the Declaration of Trust, Certificate of Establishment and Designation and By-Laws of the Registrant defining the rights of holders of the Fund as a series of the Registrant.(b) | |
4 | (a) | | Form of Management Agreement between the Registrant and Fund Asset Management, L.P.(FAM)(a) |
(b) | | Supplement to Management Agreement between the Registrant and FAM.(f) | |
5 | (a) | | Form of Revised Class A Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and Merrill Lynch Funds Distributor, Inc. (now known as Princeton Funds Distributor, Inc.) (the Distributor) (including Form of Selected Dealers Agreement).(f) |
(b) | | Form of Class B Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and the Distributor (including Form of Selected Dealers Agreement).(a) | |
(c) | | Form of Class C Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and the Distributor (including Form of Selected Dealers Agreement).(f) | |
(d) | | Form of Class D Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and the Distributor (including Form of Selected Dealers Agreement).(f) | |
(e) | | Letter Agreement between the Fund and the Distributor, dated September 15, 1993, in connection with the Merrill Lynch Mutual Fund Advisor Program.(c) | |
6 | | None. | |
7 | | Form of Custody Agreement between the Registrant and The Bank of New York.(d) | |
8 | | Form of Transfer Agency, Dividend Disbursing Agency and Shareholder Servicing Agency Agreement between the Registrant and Merrill Lynch Financial Data Services, Inc. (now known as Financial Data Services, Inc.)(a) | |
9 | (a) | | Opinion of Brown & Wood LLP, counsel to the Registrant.(d) |
(b) | | Consent of Brown & Wood LLP, counsel to the Registrant. | |
10 | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for the Registrant. | |
11 | | None. | |
12 | (a) | | Certificate of FAM with respect to the California Fund.(d) |
(b) | | Certificate of FAM with respect to the Florida Fund.(d) | |
13 | (a) | | Class B Distribution Plan of the Registrant and Class B Distribution Plan Sub-Agreement.(c) |
(b) | | Form of Class C Distribution Plan of the Registrant and Class C Distribution Plan Sub-Agreement.(f) | |
(c) | | Class D Distribution Plan of the Registrant and Class D Distribution Plan Sub-Agreement.(f) | |
14 | | None | |
15 | | Merrill Lynch Select PricingSM System Plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3.(h) |
__________
(a) |
Filed on September 28, 1993 as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 33-50417) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of the Registrant (the Registration Statement). |
(b) |
Reference is made to Article II, Section 2.3 and Articles V, VI, VIII, IX, X and XI of the Registrants amended and restated Declaration of Trust, as amended, filed as Exhibits 1(a) (1) and 1(a)(2) to the Registration |
C-1 |
Statement; to the Certificates of Establishment and Designation establishing each series of the Registrant and establishing Class A and Class B shares of beneficial interest of each series of the Registrant filed as Exhibits 1(b) (1), 1(b)(2) and 1(c), respectively, to the Registration Statement; and to Articles I, V and VI of the Registrants By-Laws, filed as Exhibit 2 to the Registration Statement. |
|
(c) |
Filed on October 13, 1993 as an Exhibit to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement. |
(d) |
Filed on November 17, 1993 as an Exhibit to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement. |
(e) |
Filed on May 17, 1994 as an Exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement. |
(f) |
Filed on October 14, 1994 as an Exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement. |
(g) |
Filed on November 21, 1995 as an Exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement. |
(h) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, filed on January 25, 1996, relating to shares of Merrill Lynch New York Municipal Bond Fund series of Merrill Lynch Multi-State Municipal Series Trust (File No. 2-99473). |
(i) | Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement. |
Item 24. Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with RegistrantThe Registrant is not controlled by or under common control with any other person. Item 25. IndemnificationSection 5.3 of the Registrants Declaration of Trust provides as follows: The Trust shall indemnify each of its Trustees, officers, employees and agents (including persons who serve at its request as directors, officers or trustees of another organization in which it has any interest as a shareholder, creditor or otherwise) against all liabilities and expenses (including amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments, in compromise, as fines and penalties and as counsel fees) reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or disposition of any action, suit or other proceeding, whether civil or criminal, in which he may be involved or with which he may be threatened, while in office or thereafter, by reason of his being or having been such a trustee, officer, employee or agent, except with respect to any matter as to which he shall have been adjudicated to have acted in bad faith, willful misfeasance, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his duties; provided, however, that as to any matter disposed of by a compromise payment by such person, pursuant to a consent decree or otherwise, no indemnification either for said payment or for any other expenses shall be provided unless the Trust shall have received a written opinion from independent legal counsel approved by the Trustees to the effect that if either the matter of willful misfeasance, gross negligence or reckless disregard of duty, or the matter of good faith and reasonable belief as to the best interests of the Trust, had been adjudicated, it would have been adjudicated in favor of such person. The rights accruing to any Person under these provisions shall not exclude any other right to which he or she may be lawfully entitled; provided that no Person may satisfy any right of indemnity or reimbursement granted herein or in Section 5.1 or to which he or she may be otherwise entitled except out of the property of the Trust, and no Shareholder shall be personally liable to any Person with respect to any claim for indemnity or reimbursement or otherwise. The Trustees may make advance payments in connection with indemnification under this Section 5.3, provided that the indemnified person shall have given a written undertaking to reimburse the Trust in the event it is subsequently determined that he is not entitled to such indemnification. Insofar as the conditional advancing of indemnification moneys for actions based upon the Investment Company Act of 1940 may be concerned, such payments will be made only on the following conditions: (i) the advances must be limited to amounts used, or to be used, for the preparation or presentation of a defense to the action, including costs connected with the preparation of a settlement; (ii) advances may be made only upon receipt of a written promise by, or on behalf of, the recipient to repay that amount of the advance which exceeds the amount which it is ultimately determined that he or she is entitled to receive from the Registrant by reason of indemnification; and (iii)(a) such promise must be secured by a surety bond, other suitable insurance or an equivalent form of security which assures that any repayments may be obtained by the Registrant without delay or litigation, which bond, insurance or other form of security must be provided by the recipient of the advance, or C-2 (b) a majority of a quorum of the Registrants disinterested, non-party Trustees, or an independent legal counsel in a written opinion, shall determine, based upon a review of readily available facts that the recipient of the advance ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification. In Section 9 of the Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D Shares Distribution Agreements relating to the securities being offered hereby, the Registrant agrees to indemnify the Distributor and each person, if any, who controls the Distributor within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act), against certain types of civil liabilities arising in connection with the Registration Statement or Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the 1933 Act may be permitted to Trustees, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant and the principal underwriter pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a Trustee, officer, or controlling person of the Registrant and the principal underwriter in connection with the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such Trustee, officer or controlling person or the principal underwriter in connection with the shares being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. Item 26. Business and Other Connections of Investment AdviserFund Asset Management, L.P. (the Manager or FAM) acts as the investment adviser for the following open-end registered investment companies: CBA Money Fund, CMA Government Securities Fund, CMA Money Fund, CMA Multi-State Municipal Series Trust, CMA Tax-Exempt Fund, CMA Treasury Fund, The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc., Financial Institutions Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Basic Value Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch California Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Corporate Bond Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Corporate High Yield Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Emerging Tigers Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Federal Securities Trust, Merrill Lynch Funds for Institutions Series, Merrill Lynch Multi-State Limited Maturity Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Multi-State Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Phoenix Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Special Value Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch World Income Fund, Inc., and The Municipal Fund Accumulation Program, Inc.; and for the following closed-end registered investment companies: Apex Municipal Fund, Inc., Corporate High Yield Fund, Inc., Corporate High Yield Fund II, Inc., Corporate High Yield Fund III, Inc., Debt Strategies Fund, Inc., Debt Strategies Fund II, Inc., Debt Strategies Fund III, Inc., Income Opportunities Fund 1999, Inc., Income Opportunities Fund 2000, Inc., Merrill Lynch Municipal Strategy Fund, Inc., MuniAssets Fund, Inc., MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund III, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund IV, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund V, Inc., MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund, MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund II, MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund III, MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund IV, MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund V, MuniHoldings Insured Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings Insured Fund III, Inc., MuniHoldings Insured Fund IV, Inc., MuniHoldings Michigan Insured Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings Michigan Insured FundII,Inc., MuniHoldings New Jersey Insured Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New Jersey Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings New Jersey Insured Fund III, Inc., MuniHoldings New Jersey Insured Fund IV, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund III, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund IV, Inc., MuniHoldings Pennsylvania Insured Fund, MuniInsured Fund, Inc., MuniVest Fund, Inc., MuniVest Fund II, Inc., MuniVest Florida Fund, MuniVest Michigan Insured Fund, Inc., MuniVest New Jersey Fund, Inc., MuniVest Pennsylvania Insured Fund, MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc., MuniYield California Fund, Inc., MuniYield California Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield California Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniYield Florida Fund, MuniYield Florida Insured Fund, MuniYield Fund, Inc., MuniYield Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield Michigan Fund, Inc., MuniYield Michigan Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield New Jersey Fund, Inc., MuniYield New Jersey Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield New York Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield New York Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniYield Pennsylvania Fund, MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc., MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc., Senior High Income Portfolio, Inc. and Worldwide DollarVest Fund, Inc. C-3 Merrill Lynch Asset Management, L.P. (MLAM), an affiliate of the Manager, acts as the investment adviser for the following open-end registered investment companies: Merrill Lynch Adjustable Rate Securities Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Americas Income Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Asset Builder Program, Inc., Merrill Lynch Asset Growth Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Asset Income Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Capital Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Convertible Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Developing Capital Markets Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Disciplined Equity Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Dragon Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch EuroFund, Merrill Lynch Fundamental Growth Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Allocation Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement, Merrill Lynch Global Growth Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Resources Trust, Merrill Lynch Global SmallCap Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Technology Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Utility Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Value Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Growth Fund, Merrill Lynch Healthcare Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Intermediate Government Bond Fund, Merrill Lynch International Equity Fund, Merrill Lynch Latin America Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Middle East/Africa Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Pacific Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Ready Assets Trust, Merrill Lynch Real Estate Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Retirement Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Series Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Short-Term Global Income Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Strategic Dividend Fund, Merrill Lynch U.S. Treasury Money Fund, Merrill Lynch U.S.A. Government Reserves, Merrill Lynch Utility Income Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Variable Series Funds, Inc. and Hotchkis and Wiley Funds (advised by Hotchkis and Wiley, a division of MLAM); and for the following closed-end registered investment companies: Merrill Lynch High Income Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Senior Floating Rate Fund, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Senior Floating Rate Fund II, Inc. MLAM also acts as sub-adviser to Merrill Lynch World Strategy Portfolio and Merrill Lynch Basic Value Equity Portfolio, two investment portfolios of EQ Advisors Trust. The address of each of these registered investment companies is P.O. Box 9011, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9011, except that the address of Merrill Lynch Funds for Institutions Series and Merrill Lynch Intermediate Government Bond Fund is One Financial Center, 23rd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02111-2665. The address of the Manager, MLAM, Princeton Services, Inc. (Princeton Services) and Princeton Administrators, L.P. (Princeton Administrators) is also P.O. Box 9011, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9011. The address of Princeton Funds Distributor, Inc., (PFD) and of Merrill Lynch Funds Distributor (MLFD) is P.O. Box 9081, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9081. The address of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch) and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (ML & Co.) is World Financial Center, North Tower, 250 Vesey Street, New York, New York 10281-1201. The address of the Funds transfer agent, Financial Data Services, Inc. (FDS), is 4800 Deer Lake Drive East, Jacksonville, Florida 32246-6484. Set forth below is a list of each executive officer and partner of the Manager indicating each business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which each such person or entity has been engaged since August 1, 1997 for his, her or its own account or in the capacity of director, officer, partner or trustee. In addition, Mr. Glenn is President and Mr. Burke is Vice President and Treasurer of all or substantially all of the investment companies described in the first two paragraphs of this Item 26, and Messrs. Doll, Giordano, and Monagle are officers of one or more of such companies. |
Name
|
Position(s) with the Manager |
Other Substantial Business, Profession, Vocation or Employment |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ML & Co. | Limited Partner | Financial Services Holding Company; Limited Partner of MLAM | |||
Princeton Services | General Partner | General Partner of MLAM | |||
Jeffrey M. Peek | President | President of MLAM; President and Director of Princeton Services; Executive Vice President of ML & Co.; Managing Director and Co-Head of the Investment Banking Division of Merrill Lynch in 1997 |
C-4 |
Name
|
Position(s) with the Manager |
Other Substantial Business, Profession, Vocation or Employment |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terry K. Glenn | Executive Vice President |
Executive Vice President of MLAM; Executive Vice President and Director of Princeton Services; President and Director of PFD; Director of FDS; President of Princeton Administrators | |||
Gregory A. Bundy | Chief Operating Officer and Managing Director |
Chief Operating Officer and Managing Director of MLAM; Chief Operating Officer and Managing Director of Princeton Services; Co-CEO of Merrill Lynch Australia from 1997 to 1999 | |||
Donald C. Burke | Senior Vice President and Treasurer |
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Director of Taxation of MLAM; Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Princeton Services; Vice President of PFD; First Vice President of MLAM from 1997 to 1999; Vice President of MLAM from 1990 to 1997 | |||
Michael G. Clark | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services; Treasurer and Director of PFD; First Vice President of MLAM from 1997 to 1999; Vice President of MLAM from 1996 to 1997 | |||
Robert C. Doll | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services; Chief Investment Officer of Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. in 1999 and Executive Vice President thereof from 1991 to 1999 | |||
Linda L. Federici | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services | |||
Vincent R. Giordano | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services | |||
Michael J. Hennewinkel | Senior Vice President Secretary and General Counsel |
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services | |||
Philip L. Kirstein | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President, Secretary and Director of Princeton Services | |||
Debra W. Landsman-Yaros | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services; Vice President of PFDS | |||
Stephen M. M. Miller | Senior Vice President | Executive Vice President of Princeton Administrators; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services | |||
Joseph T. Monagle, Jr. | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services | |||
Brian A. Murdock | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services | |||
Gregory D. Upah | Senior Vice President | Senior Vice President of MLAM; Senior Vice President of Princeton Services |
Item 27. Principal Underwriters(a) MLFD, a division of PFD, acts as the principal underwriter for the Registrant and for each of the open-end registered investment companies referred to in the first two paragraphs of Item 26 except CBA Money Fund, CMA Government Securities Fund, CMA Money Fund, CMA Multi-State Municipal Series Trust, CMA Tax-Exempt Fund, CMA Treasury Fund, The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc. The Municipal Fund Accumulation Program, Inc. MLFD also acts as the principal underwriter for the following closed-end registered investment companies: Merrill Lynch High Income Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Municipal Strategy Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Senior Floating Rate Fund, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Senior Floating Rate Fund II, Inc. A separate division of PFD acts as the principal underwriter of a number of other investment companies. C-5 (b) Set forth below is information concerning each director and officer of PFD. The principal business address of each such person is P.O. Box 9081, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9081, except that the address of Messrs. Breen, Crook, Fatseas and Wasel is One Financial Center, 23rd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02111-2665. |
Name
|
Position(s) and Office(s) with PFD |
Position(s) and Office(s) with Registrant |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terry K. Glenn | President and Director | President and Trustee | |||
Michael G. Clark | Treasurer and Director | None | |||
Thomas J. Verage | Director | None | |||
Robert W. Crook | Senior Vice President | None | |||
Michael J. Brady | Vice President | None | |||
William M. Breen | Vice President | None | |||
Donald C. Burke | Vice President | Vice President and Treasurer | |||
James T. Fatseas | Vice President | None | |||
Debra W. Landsman-Yaros | Vice President | None | |||
Michelle T. Lau | Vice President | None | |||
Salvatore Venezia | Vice President | None | |||
William Wasel | Vice President | None | |||
Robert Harris | Secretary | None |
(c) Not applicable. Item 28. Location of Accounts and RecordsAll accounts, books and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder are maintained at the offices of the Registrant (800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536), and its transfer agent, Financial Data Services, Inc. (4800 Deer Lake Drive East, Jacksonville, Florida 32246-6484). Item 29. Management ServicesOther than as set forth under the caption Management of the Funds Fund Asset Management in the Prospectus constituting Part A of the Registration Statement and under Management of the Trust Management and Advisory Arrangements in the Statement of Additional Information constituting Part B of the Registration Statement, the Registrant is not a party to any management-related service contract. Item 30. Undertakings.Not applicable. C-6 SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Township of Plainsboro, and the State of New Jersey, on the 30th day of September, 1999. |
MERRILL LYNCH
MULTI-STATE LIMITED MATURITY MUNICIPAL SERIES TRUST (Registrant) |
|
By /s/
DONALD C. BURKE (Donald C. Burke, Vice President and Treasurer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
---|---|---|
TERRY K. GLENN* (Terry K. Glenn) |
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
DONALD C. BURKE* (Donald C. Burke) |
Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
September 30, 1999 |
JAMES H. BODURTHA* (James H. Bodurtha) |
Trustee | |
HERBERT I. LONDON* (Herbert I. London) |
Trustee | |
ROBERT R. MARTIN* (Robert R. Martin) |
Trustee | |
JOSEPH L. MAY* (Joseph L. May) |
Trustee | |
ANDRÉ F. PEROLD* (André F. Perold) |
Trustee | |
ARTHUR ZEIKEL* (Arthur Zeikel) |
Trustee | |
*By: /s/
DONALD C. BURKE (Donald C. Burke, Attorney-in-Fact) |
September 30, 1999 |
C-7 POWER OF ATTORNEYThe undersigned Directors/Trustees and officers of each of the registered investment companies listed below hereby authorize Terry K. Glenn, Donald C. Burke and Joseph T. Monagle, Jr., or any of them, as attorney-in-fact, to sign on his or her behalf in the capacities indicated any Registration Statement or amendment thereto (including post-effective amendments) for each of the following registered investment companies and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission: Merrill Lynch California Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Multi-State Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Multi-State Limited Maturity Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Convertible Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Consults International Portfolio, Merrill Lynch Growth Fund, Merrill Lynch World Income Fund, Inc., MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund III, MuniHoldings Michigan Insured Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund III, Inc., MuniHoldings Pennsylvania Insured Fund, MuniVest Pennsylvania Insured Fund, MuniYield Fund, Inc., MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc., MuniYield California Fund, Inc., MuniYield California Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield California Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniYield Florida Fund, MuniYield Michigan Fund, Inc., MuniYield New Jersey Fund, Inc., MuniYield New York Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield New York Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. and MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. Dated: April 7, 1999 |
/s/ TERRY K. GLENN* Terry K. Glenn (President/Principal Executive Officer/Director/Trustee) |
/s/ JOSEPH L. MAY Joseph L. May (Director/Trustee) |
/s/ JAMES H. BODURTHA James H. Bodurtha (Director/Trustee) |
/s/ ANDRE F. PEROLD André F. Perold (Director/Trustee) |
/s/ HERBERT I. LONDON Herbert I. London (Director/Trustee) |
/s/ ARTHUR ZEIKEL Arthur Zeikel (Director/Trustee) |
/s/ ROBERT R. MARTIN Robert R. Martin (Director/Trustee) |
/s/ DONALD C. BURKE Donald C. Burke (Vice President/Treasurer/Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
C-8 EXHIBIT INDEX |
Exhibit Numbers |
Description
|
||
---|---|---|---|
9 | (b) | | Consent of Brown & Wood LLP, counsel to the Registrant. |
10 | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for the Registrant. |
|