|
Previous: SEP ACCT VA K EXECANNUITY OF ALLMERICA FIN LFE INS & ANN CO, 485BPOS, EX-10, 2000-10-26 |
Next: MERRILL LYNCH TEXAS MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, 24F-2NT, 2000-10-26 |
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Revocation Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
[Amendment No............]
Filed by the Registrant /X/
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
/X/ Preliminary Proxy Statement (Revocation of Consent)
/ / Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
/ / Definitive Proxy Statement (Revocation of Consent Statement)
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-11(c) or § 240.14a-12
WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION
CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
_________________________________________________________________
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement if other than Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ No fee required
/ / $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a6(i)(2) or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: _______________________ | ||
2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: _______________________ | ||
3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): _________________________ | ||
4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ___________________________ | ||
5) | Total fee paid: __________________________ |
/ / Fee paid previously by written preliminary materials.
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided in Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1) | Amount Previously Paid: __________________________________________ | ||
2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:_________________________ | ||
3) | Filing Party: ____________________________________________________ | ||
4) | Date Filed: ____________________________________________________ |
PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED OCTOBER 25, 2000
[WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION LOGO]
Office: Suite 9000 One OHare Centre 6250 North River Road Rosemont, Il 60018 |
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5062 Rosemont, Il 60017-5062 |
November , 2000
IMPORTANT
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
We are writing to alert you that Edward A. Burkhardt has started a consent solicitation in an attempt to seize control of your Company-without offering you any value for your shares. Mr. Burkhardt has formed a group (the Burkhardt Group) calling itself the Wisconsin Central Shareholders Committee to Maximize Value, that is contacting stockholders and asking them to sign consent forms to remove, without cause, your entire Board of Directors and replace your directors with Mr. Burkhardts own hand-picked nominees. Your Board of Directors is unanimously opposed to the Burkhardt Groups solicitation.
We urge you NOT TO SIGN any WHITE consent card or other forms which may be sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. The board urges you to DISCARD any WHITE consent cards sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. |
Mr. Burkhardt was one of the founders of the Company and served as its Chief Executive Officer from its founding in 1987 until August 31, 1999. The last three years of Mr. Burkhardts service as Chief Executive Officer saw the Companys common stock price decline from a high in the first quarter of 1997 of $44.00 per share to a low in the second quarter of 1999 (just prior to Mr. Burkhardts removal by the Board) of $12.38 per share, a loss of 71.86% of the Companys value and $1.6 billion in market capitalization.
The steady erosion of earnings, loss of stockholder confidence and ultimately the drop in share price were symptoms that fundamental change was needed. The management style and structure that had been suitable during the early years of our small start-up venture were no longer adequate for the larger, global enterprise our Company had become. Your Board took the steps necessary to effect change. Immediately upon Mr. Burkhardts departure, this Board restructured the holding company, conducted a worldwide search for and recruited experienced executive talent, focused on the creation of economic value through the generation of free cash flow, while encouraging open dialogue with stockholders.
The change was effective. Our operational performance over the past twelve months has been strong. During that period the operating ratio for our North American operations has averaged 73.7%, as compared to an average of 83% for the North American Class I railroads. Wisconsin Central continues to focus on customer service, and this year was awarded its twelfth consecutive Readers Choice award by Logistics Management and Distribution Report, a respected industry publication. Since Mr. Burkhardt left the Company our North American operations have reported record
revenues in every quarter, and our international affiliates have similarly posted significant revenue gains.
Your Board of Directors, substantial investors in your Companys stock, shares your frustration with the rail industrys valuation in the market. Despite our strong operational performance, our stock has not fared well in the market, but it has done slightly better than other railroad stocks. From July 7, 1999 (the announcement of Mr. Burkhardts removal by the Board) to October 20, 2000, our share price fell 37%, versus a 38% decline for a composite of publicly traded North American railroads. In response to low market valuations of our common stock, your Board authorized a stock repurchase program in March 2000 and extended this program in September 2000 to take advantage of the continued pressure on rail valuations.
In September, your Board also announced a restructuring of North American operations, its continuing commitment to improved asset utilization, positive free cash flow and continued investment anywhere substantial stockholder returns are available and disinvestment where such returns are unavailable.
The Burkhardt Groups so-called program for maximizing the value of the Company in part mimics the Companys announced strategy, but adds a naive, unworkable liquidation plan. We are thirteen months into a difficult program of restoring shareholder value. Switching members of the Board and management at this time risks delaying or significantly reducing the pace of change necessary to complete the restoration of shareholder value. Moreover, returning control of the Company to Mr. Burkhardt, under whose leadership the erosion occurred, turns back the clock.
The Burkhardt Groups complaints about the Companys international investment strategy are confusing, but appear to be aimed at the policies Mr. Burkhardt put in place while he was in charge of the Company, including taking minority positions and partnering with venture capitalists. Since Mr. Burkhardts departure, the Company has adopted a disciplined approach to international investment, and seeks to exploit its core competency the ability to provide excellent customer service to rail customers and profitably move freight by rail. Our new strategy de-emphasizes the investment of huge amounts of capital in order to own monolithic integrated enterprises, in favor of a more modern approach focused on business partnering, outsourcing and open access to track owned by others. We will also focus on the generation of fee-based income instead of simply equity sales as a mechanism for generating return on investment.
We urge you to examine closely Mr. Burkhardts motivation in starting this costly and disruptive consent solicitation. Please see the section entitled A Closer Look at the Burkhardt Solicitation and a Closer Look at the Facts in the enclosed Consent Revocation Statement.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
We believe stockholders will see increased value as we pursue our strategic plans, and we urge you to act today to protect your investment in the Company. Whether or not you have previously signed the Burkhardt Groups WHITE consent card, please sign and date the enclosed BLUE Consent Revocation Card and mail it at once in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. The Burkhardt Group is trying to avoid normal corporate processes and manipulate you and your fellow stockholders into acting immediately, so it is important that you mail promptly your BLUE Consent Revocation Card. Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares you own, so please act today.
We will continue to act in the best interests of all Wisconsin Central stockholders, and will endeavor to keep you informed of all important developments.
On behalf of your Board of Directors, we thank you for your continued trust and support.
Sincerely,
Thomas F. Power, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer |
Robert H. Wheeler Chairman of the Board of Directors |
PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED OCTOBER 25, 2000
Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation Suite 9000, One OHare Centre, 6250 North River Road Rosemont, IL 60018 |
This Consent Revocation Statement and the enclosed BLUE Consent Revocation Card are first being mailed to stockholders on or about November , 2000.
CONSENT REVOCATION STATEMENT FURNISHED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION IN OPPOSITION TO THE SOLICITATION OF CONSENTS BY THE WISCONSIN CENTRAL SHAREHOLDERS COMMITTEE TO MAXIMIZE VALUE
This Revocation of Consent Statement and the accompanying BLUE Consent Revocation Card are being furnished by the Board of Directors (the Board) of Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation, a Delaware corporation (WCTC or the Company), to the holders of outstanding shares of the Companys common stock, par value $.01 per share (the Common Stock), in opposition to the solicitation (the Burkhardt Solicitation) by the Burkhardt Group of written consents from the stockholders of WCTC. The Burkhardt Group consists of Edward A. Burkhardt, John W. Barriger, Raymond C. Burton, Jr., Robert E. Dowdy, Aaron J. Gellman, Michael W. Howell, Henry Posner III and Andy Sze, and refers to itself as the Wisconsin Central Shareholders Committee to Maximize Value.
The Burkhardt Group is attempting to take complete control of WCTC. The purpose of the Burkhardt Solicitation is to attempt to remove, without cause, the Companys entire Board of Directors and replace them with eight new directors selected by the Burkhardt Group. The Burkhardt Group also is soliciting consents in support of three proposed amendments to the Companys By-laws (the By-laws) and one other proposal, all as described in more detail below.
IMPORTANT
The Companys Board of Directors unanimously opposes the Burkhardt solicitation and urges you NOT TO SIGN any WHITE consent card or any other forms which may be sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. Please DISCARD any WHITE consent cards sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. |
Even if you previously signed and returned the Burkhardt Groups WHITE consent card, you have every right to revoke your consent. We urge you to sign, date and mail the enclosed BLUE consent revocation card in the postage-paid envelope provided. Your prompt action is important. Please return the BLUE consent revocation card today. In order to be sure that you are revoking a prior consent, you must either mark the REVOKE CONSENT box or the ABSTAIN box on the BLUE consent revocation card, or sign and date the BLUE consent revocation card without marking any boxes. |
-1-
Even if you have not previously signed and returned any WHITE consent card to the Burkhardt Group, you MAY send a BLUE revocation card to the Company to demonstrate your support and assist us in monitoring the progress of the solicitation. |
If your shares are held in street name, only your broker or banker can vote your shares, and only after receiving your instructions. Please contact the person responsible for your account and instruct him or her to vote a BLUE consent revocation card on your behalf today. |
If you have any questions about giving your revocation of consent or require assistance, please call D.F. King & CO., Inc., which is assisting your Company, toll free at 1-800-769-4414.
REASONS FOR OPPOSING THE BURKHARDT SOLICITATION
WCTCs Board of Directors unanimously opposes the Burkhardt Solicitation and urges you NOT TO SIGN any WHITE consent card or any other forms which may be sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. The Burkhardt Group is soliciting written consents to remove, without cause, the Companys entire Board of Directors and replace them with Mr. Burkhardts hand picked nominees. The six proposals set forth in the Burkhardt Solicitation (the Burkhardt Proposals) are set forth in Appendix A hereto.
In furtherance of its goal of seeking to take complete control of the Company without offering stockholders any value at all for their shares, and without presenting any specific plan for increasing stockholder value, the Burkhardt Group is seeking written consents of the Companys stockholders to remove, without cause, the entire Board of Directors and to replace the directors with eight persons selected by the Burkhardt Group. The Burkhardt Group also is seeking consents in support of the other four Burkhardt Proposals which, taken together, are designed to remove stockholder protections against attempted takeovers, such as this attempted takeover by the Burkhardt Group. Burkhardt Proposal 6 is designed to nullify unspecified By-laws which may be adopted by your Board in its efforts to act in and protect the interests of the Company. In response to the Burkhardt Solicitation, the Board of Directors is asking the Companys stockholders not to provide their consent and is soliciting from the Companys stockholders revocations of any consents that may have been given. The recommendations of the Board of Directors of the Company described in this Consent Revocation Statement were adopted unanimously.
On September 21, 2000, the Board announced current actions aimed at improving stockholder value, including continuation of the Companys stock repurchase program, a restructuring of the Companys North American operations, and a focus on free cash flow from operations. The Board committed to stockholders that it would not invest in a transaction where it could not build value and would dispose of investments that would not increase in value. The Company believes the consideration of investment decisions and, in particular, the implementation of such strategic decisions can best be achieved by the current Board of Directors which is most familiar with the Company and its operations
-2-
and which is dedicated to building value for all of the Companys stockholders rather than the self-interest of one stockholder.
The Burkhardt Groups so-called program to maximize shareholder value consists of (i) the intent to discontinue the Companys profitable involvement in international privatization transactions, (ii) the proposal to liquidate the Companys current international investments, (iii) unspecified plans to improve the Companys domestic operations, (iv) positioning the Companys domestic operations for sale, (v) increasing the Companys share repurchase program and (vi) electing their hand-picked nominees to the Companys Board of Directors.
Mr. Burkhardt owns Rail World, Inc., which competes directly with the Company for international privatization transactions. The Companys exit from that line of business would benefit Mr. Burkhardts personal financial interests without compensating the Companys stockholders. With the exception of discontinuing a line of the Companys business for Mr. Burkhardts personal advantage, the Burkhardt Group has not proposed any new business strategy for the CompanyCrather, the Burkhardt Group has in part reiterated the Companys announced strategy and in part proposed a naive, unworkable plan to liquidate the Company. As noted above, the Company has already announced a restructuring of its domestic operations to improve profitability and the continuation of its share repurchase program. In the judgment of the Board, the timing is not right for the sale of any of the Companys domestic or international properties, especially in light of the moratorium on Class I mergers imposed by the US Surface Transportation Board.1
The Burkhardt Group is simply trying to take control of the Company for its own benefit and advantage with no clear plan to improve operations or increase stockholder value. In the Boards judgment, there is no basis to believe that the Burkhardt Group will in any way enhance stockholder value.
The eight people the Burkhardt Group would install as directors of your Company consist of Mr. Burkhardt and seven other individuals who, prior to 60 days ago, had invested in only 3,100 shares of the Companys stock. Even today, those seven individuals own in the aggregate only 28,250 shares of the Companys stock. By comparison, the members of the existing Board of Directors beneficially own in the aggregate over 2.7 million shares of the Companys stock. We believe you will agree that you cannot afford to put the future of your investment in the hands of Mr. Burkhardts nominees.
Your Board of Directors is and always has been committed to increasing value for all stockholders. There is no reason to believe that the Burkhardt Group will be any more successful in executing the Companys strategic plan than the Companys existing Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors believes that the naive and reckless manner in which the Burkhardt Group publicly proposes to liquidate the Company will result in severe diminution of the stockholders value.
Mr. Burkhardt should not be permitted to remove a competitor to his principal personally owned business by discontinuing the Companys involvement in international privatization transactions without compensating the Companys stockholders for the value of that business. The Company has invested millions of dollars and many person-years of effort to build its position and reputation in the international privatization market. The Company is generally regarded as world class in this line of business. Mr. Burkhardt seeks to discontinue that business, with the effect of eliminating the Company as an effective
1 While an acquisition of WCTCs domestic subsidiaries is not explicitly covered by the Surface Transportation Boards merger moratorium, the Surface Transportation Boards actions in Ex Parte 634 clearly indicate its intention to treat any such action as a major transaction subject to the moratorium and the new merger rules currently scheduled for adoption in mid-2001.
-3-
competitor to his own business, without the payment of any consideration whatsoever to the Companys stockholders.
We regret that a costly and disruptive proxy contest has been forced upon your Company, particularly since our energies are better devoted to executing our program aimed at restoring stockholder value through improved profitability, the generation of free cash flow and the better utilization of assets.
The companys Board of Directors opposes the burkhardt solicitation and urges you NOT TO SIGN any WHITE consent card or any other forms which may be sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. Please DISCARD any WHITE consent cards sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. |
Even if you previously signed and returned the Burkhardt Groups WHITE consent card, you have every right to revoke your consent. We urge you to sign, date and mail the enclosed BLUE consent revocation card in the postage-paid envelope provided. Your prompt action is important. Please return the BLUE consent revocation card today. In order to be sure that you are revoking a prior consent, you must either mark the REVOKE CONSENT box or the ABSTAIN box on the BLUE consent revocation card, or sign and date the BLUE consent revocation card without marking any boxes. |
Even if you have not previously signed and returned any WHITE consent card to the Burkhardt Group, you MAY send a BLUE revocation card to the Company to demonstrate your support and assist us in monitoring the progress of the solicitation. |
If your shares are held in street name, only your broker or banker can vote your shares, and only after receiving your instructions. Please contact the person responsible for your account and instruct him or her to vote a blue consent revocation card on your behalf today. |
If you have any questions, please call D.F. King & CO., Inc., which is assisting your Company, toll-free at 1-800-769-4414.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE BURKHARDT SOLICITATION
AND A CLOSER LOOK AT THE FACTS
The Burkhardt Group makes several assertions about the Company. Take a closer look at the facts:
-4-
The Burkhardt Group wants you to believe that the Company has been patently unsuccessful in growing its business.
THE FACTS: This is untrue. Since Mr. Burkhardts departure, our North American operations have reported record revenues in each and every quarter. Tranz Rail Holdings Limited (Tranz Rail) set new revenue and tonnage records for the last fiscal year and showed an operating profit improvement of 125%. English Welsh & Scottish Railway Holdings Limited (EWS) has reported year over year revenue growth in the last four successive quarters following two years of revenue declines and disappointments under Mr. Burkhardts leadership.
The Burkhardt Group criticizes Managements strategy as not working, here or abroad.
THE FACTS: Your Company has made significant progress in key areas, but it is naive to believe that a problem that took three years to create under Mr. Burkhardts watch can be corrected with a couple of quick fixes. We have been intensely focused on positive free cash flow. During the 12 months preceding Mr. Burkhardts removal by the Board in 1999, the four companies combined-North America, NZ, UK and Australia-had negative free cash flow of US$115 million. During the succeeding 12 months, the four companies reported positive free cash flow of US$12 million. Thats an improvement of US$127 million in free cash flow since Mr. Burkhardts removal.
The Burkhardt Group states that Management has elected to pursue improved financial performance through cost cutting.
THE FACTS: For once, Mr. Burkhardt is correct. Management does aggressively pursue improved financial performance through cost control. In September, the Company announced a domestic restructuring eliminating 44 salaried positions, the first restructuring in ten years, as one part of ongoing strategic reviews. The Board believes good management includes prudent cost control.
The Burkhardt Group proposes to Discontinue efforts to invest in international privatizations which are risky and highly competitive, with corresponding low returns.
THE FACTS: You should know that Mr. Burkhardt and Mr. Posner (one of the Burkhardt Groups nominees) compete directly with the Company for international privatization transactions, and the Companys exit from that line of business would benefit Mr. Burkhardts and Mr. Posners personal financial interests without compensating the Companys stockholders. Mr. Burkhardts current view of international investment directly contradicts his May 1999 address to the Companys stockholders when he stated,
I am as enthusiastic about EWS today as I was in 1996 when this brand new company was formed from the ashes of British Rail. But this is a big and complex property and its going to take time to get this railroad really humming and to realize its substantial potential, |
and his reference to the Australian property of Westrail (for which Mr. Posner is currently a bidder with Mr. Burkhardts assistance) as a bigger better rail opportunity for WCTC than the Victorian railroad, V/Line Freight, where WCTC was an unsuccessful bidder. Your Board believes the Burkhardt
-5-
Group is simply trying to take control of the Company for its own benefit and advantage. If international privatizations are truly as unattractive as the Burkhardt Group asserts, it is hard to understand Mr. Burkhardts and Mr. Posners dedication to investing in them in competition with your Company.
The Burkhardt Group wants you to believe that your Board has failed to consider sales or mergers as a means to maximize value.
THE FACTS: This is simply untrue. The Board has not ruled out any avenue for building value. Since Mr. Burkhardts departure the Board has conducted in-depth reviews of alternate strategies to maximize shareholder value. The Boards current strategic plan is a combination of actions intended to yield the highest expected values, given todays competitive environment and market conditions (including regulatory constraints). Necessarily, this is a dynamic, on-going analysis. For instance, Tranz Rail has recently announced its plan to focus on its core rail-freight business and dispose of certain lines of business and non-core properties, thereby monetizing underperforming assets while building core competency. For the record, your Board is dedicated to building value for all of the Companys stockholders.
The Burkhardt Group cites the decline in the stock price since July 1999 as the reason for taking the extreme action of proposing to unseat the Board.
THE FACTS: For the record, Mr. Burkhardt was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company until August 31, 1999, not July. In the last three years of Mr. Burkhardts leadership, the stock price fell from a high of $44.00 to a low of $12.38, representing the loss of $1.6 billion of market capitalization, in a very strong bull stock market. Your Board does not believe reinstating Mr. Burkhardt as chief executive officer promises any improvement when under Mr. Burkhardts leadership the Company lost 72% of its market value.
The Board is not satisfied with the performance of the Companys stock over the past 13 months. However, the Companys stock has performed consistently with the composite of the major publicly traded North American railroads2 during that period. By comparison, during the period from January 1, 1997 to July 1, 1999 under Mr. Burkhardts leadership, the Companys stock price declined 53.3% while the composite of all North American railroads rose 39.5%.
The Burkhardt Group proposes to increase the Companys share repurchase program.
THE FACTS: Current management has already done that. Since March 21, 2000 when the Companys first-ever stock repurchase program was announced, the Company has repurchased 10% of shares outstanding.
The Burkhardt Group proposes to improve corporate governance with their slate of nominees.
2 The major publicly traded North American railroads include: Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Canadian National, Canadian Pacific, CSX, Kansas City Southern, Norfolk Southern, RailAmerica and Union Pacific.
-6-
THE FACTS: The members of the existing Board of Directors have been long committed to the Company, and beneficially own in the aggregate over 2.7 million shares of the Companys stock. In comparison, seven of the people the Burkhardt Group would install as directors of your Company have no proven commitment to the Company, and prior to 60 days ago had invested in only 3,100 shares of the Companys stock. Even today, those seven individuals own in the aggregate only 28,250 shares of the Companys stock.
It appears that, apart from Mr. Burkhardt, none of the proposed nominees has served as a director of a publicly traded company. Moreover, as noted above, two of the Burkhardt Group nominees are direct competitors of the Company. Your Board does not believe the Burkhardt Group nominees are sufficiently disinterested, experienced or committed to act in the best interest of the stockholders.
The Burkhardt Group accuses the current Board and management of entrenchment tactics.
THE FACTS: The only so-called entrenchment tactics identified by the Burkhardt Group were the Companys adoption of a staggered board and the proposal to eliminate informal stockholder action by written consent, both acted upon at the May 1999 Stockholders Meeting. It is important to note that Mr. Burkhardt was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company at that time, participated in deliberations leading to those proposals, chaired the meetings at which they were proposed and, as an individual stockholder, voted his shares of stock in favor of both proposals. Since Mr. Burkhardts departure, the Board and management of the Company have enacted absolutely nothing to entrench themselves. As stockholders, your directors and management together beneficially own 10% of the Companys shares and have their interests aligned with all stockholders of the Company.
The Burkhardt Group asserts that it has designed a program to maximize shareholder value.
THE FACTS: The Burkhardt Groups public filings and press statements are confusing. The Burkhardt Group in its Securities and Exchange Commission filings has proposed both growing domestic operations and preparing them for sale.
With respect to the Companys international operations, which the Burkhardt Group has proposed liquidating, Mr. Burkhardt was quoted in the October 21, 2000 Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel as saying that your Companys international operations are a total disaster. Theyre a disaster, every one of them. Subsequently, Mr. Burkhardt has been reported as saying the international investments were fundamentally sound. Chicago Tribune, October 24, 2000, B-1, 6.
The Board is concerned that the Burkhardt Groups strategy is difficult to discern and appears to be tailored to its intended audience. We urge you not to be influenced by his self-serving criticisms.
The Companys Board of Directors opposes the Burkhardt Solicitation and urges you NOT TO SIGN any WHITE consent card or any other forms which may be sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. Please discard any white consent cards sent to you by the Burkhardt Group. |
Even if you previously signed and returned the Burkhardt Groups WHITE consent card, you have every right to revoke your consent. We urge you to |
-7-
sign, date and mail the enclosed BLUE consent revocation card in the postage-paid envelope provided. Your prompt action is important. Please return the BLUE consent revocation card today. In order to be sure that you are revoking a prior consent, you must either mark the REVOKE CONSENT box or the ABSTAIN box on the BLUE consent revocation card, or sign and date the BLUE consent revocation card without marking any boxes. | ||
Even if you have not previously signed and returned any WHITE consent card to the Burkhardt Group, you MAY send a BLUE revocation card to the Company to demonstrate your support and assist us in monitoring the progress of the solicitation. | ||
If your shares are held in street name, only your broker or banker can vote your shares, and only after receiving your instructions. Please contact the person responsible for your account and instruct him or her to vote a BLUE consent revocation card on your behalf today. |
If you have any questions, please call D.F. King & CO., Inc., which is assisting your Company, toll-free at 1-800-769-4414.
THE CONSENT PROCEDURE
Under Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the DGCL), unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, any action which may be taken at an annual or special meeting of stockholders of a corporation may be taken without a meeting if consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted, and such consents are duly delivered to the corporation.
Thus, the unrevoked consent of the holders of not less than a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the Record Date (as defined below) must be obtained within the time limit specified herein to adopt each of the Burkhardt Proposals. Since consents are required from the holders of record of not less than a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock in order for each of the Burkhardt Proposals to be adopted, an abstention from voting on the Burkhardt Groups WHITE Consent Card or a broker non-vote will have the practical effect of a vote against such proposals.
Under Section 228 of the DGCL, in order to be effective, consents with respect to the Burkhardt Proposals must be delivered within 60 days of the earliest dated consent with respect to the Burkhardt Proposals delivered to WCTC. On October , 2000 a consent with respect to shares of Common Stock executed on behalf of was delivered to the Company. The consents will not be effective unless the requisite number of unrevoked consents are obtained on or before , 2000.
On October 22, 2000 the Board of Directors established a record date (the Record Date) for stockholders entitled to consent of October 23, 2000. As of the Record Date, there were
-8-
shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. Each share entitles the holder to one vote.
A stockholder may revoke any previously signed consent by signing, dating and returning a BLUE Consent Revocation Card in the postage-paid envelope provided, and either marking the Revoke Consent box, the Abstain box or not marking any boxes. A consent may also be revoked by delivery of a written consent revocation to the Burkhardt Group. Stockholders are urged, however, to deliver all consent revocations to D.F. King & Co. by mailing in the pre-paid envelopes provided. WCTC requests that if a consent revocation is instead delivered to the Burkhardt Group, a photocopy of the revocation also be delivered to D.F. King & Co. in the pre-paid envelope provided, so that WCTC will be aware of all revocations. Any consent revocation may itself be revoked at any time by signing, dating and returning to the Burkhardt Group a subsequently dated WHITE consent card, or by delivery of a written revocation of such consent revocation to WCTC or the Burkhardt Group.
The Burkhardt Group could cease the solicitation of consents once it has determined that valid and unrevoked consents representing a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date have been obtained and deliver such consents to the Company in the manner required by Section 228 of the DGCL. Accordingly, it is important that any stockholder who has executed a consent and desires to revoke such consent sign, date and mail the BLUE Consent Revocation Card as soon as possible.
If any shares of Common Stock that you owned on the Record Date were held for you in an account with a stock brokerage firm, bank nominee or other similar street name holder, you are not entitled to vote such shares directly, but rather must give instructions to the stock brokerage firm, bank nominee or other street name holder to grant or revoke consent for the shares of Common Stock held in your name. Accordingly, you should contact the person responsible for your account and direct him or her to execute the enclosed BLUE Consent Revocation Card on your behalf. You are urged to confirm in writing your instructions to the person responsible for your account and provide a copy of those instructions to WCTC at the address set forth above so that WCTC will be aware of your instructions and can attempt to ensure such instructions are followed.
You have the right to revoke any consent you may have previously given to the Burkhardt Group. To do so, you need only sign, date and mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope the BLUE consent revocation card which accompanies this revocation statement. If you do not indicate a specific vote on the BLUE consent revocation card with respect to any Burkhardt Proposal, the card will be used in accordance with the WCTC Boards recommendation to revoke any consent with respect to such proposal.
If you are against the Burkhardt Proposals and have not signed a Burkhardt Group consent, you may show your opposition to the Burkhardt Proposals by signing, dating and returning the enclosed BLUE consent revocation card. This will better enable WCTC to keep track of how many stockholders oppose the Burkhardt Proposals.
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COMPANYS DIRECTORS AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Directors
-9-
The following table sets forth certain information concerning each of the directors.
NAME | DESCRIPTION | AGE | DIRECTOR CLASS | |||||
Robert H. Wheeler | Chairman of the Board | 55 | II | |||||
Thomas F. Power, Jr. | Chief Executive Officer and Director | 60 | II | |||||
J. Reilly McCarren | President and Chief Executive Officer of the | 43 | I | |||||
North American operating subsidiaries and | ||||||||
Director | ||||||||
Thomas E. Evans | Director | 49 | II | |||||
Carl Ferenbach | Director | 58 | I | |||||
Roland V. McPherson | Director | 66 | I | |||||
Thomas W. Rissman | Director | 43 | III | |||||
John W. Rowe | Director | 55 | III | |||||
A. Francis Small | Director | 54 | I |
Directors Whose Terms Expire at the Annual Meeting in 2003
Class I Directors
Carl Ferenbach has served as a director of the Company since 1987. He also serves as a director of Wisconsin Central International, Inc. (WCI) and North American operating subsidiaries. Mr. Ferenbach also serves as a director of Tranz Rail, the publicly held New Zealand transportation company in which the Company holds shares, Australian Transport Network Limited (ATN), the Australian rail holding company in which the Company holds shares, and EWS, the United Kingdom rail holding company in which the Company holds shares and of which Mr. Ferenbach is Deputy Chairman of the Board, a non-executive office. Mr. Ferenbach also serves as a director of US Can Corporation and Crown Castle International Corporation (U.S.). Since 1986, Mr. Ferenbach has been a Managing Director of Berkshire Partners LLC, Boston, Massachusetts, a private equity firm sponsoring and investing in acquisitions and recapitalizations.
J. Reilly McCarren has served as a director of the Company since December 1998. He also serves as a director of Wisconsin Chicago Link Ltd. (WCLL) and WCL Railcars, Inc. (WCL Railcars), two wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. Since September 1, 1999, Mr. McCarren has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companys North American operating subsidiaries. From July 1996 to August 31, 1999, Mr. McCarren served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Companys North American operating subsidiaries. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. McCarren served as the president of Gateway Western Railway Company. From 1988 to 1990, Mr. McCarren served as the General Superintendent-Transportation of the Chicago, Missouri and Western Railway. From 1978 to 1988, Mr. McCarren held various operating positions with Conrail. Mr. McCarren has 21 years of railroad management experience.
Roland V. McPherson has served as a director of the Company since 1987. He also serves as a director of WCI and North American operating subsidiaries. Mr. McPherson is the president of Asset Acquisition and Management Corporation, a private acquisition company. From 1989 to 1998, he was employed as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sullivan Industries, Inc. (a manufacturer of air compressors). From May 1976 until 1988, Mr. McPherson was employed as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Armstrong Containers, Inc. (a manufacturer of metal containers).
A. Francis Small has served as a director of the Company since December 1996. He also serves as a director of WCI and North American operating subsidiaries. Dr. Small has been a director of Tranz
-10-
Rail since 1990. Dr. Small retired as the Managing Director of Tranz Rail in May 2000 following 34 years of employment with Tranz Rail and its predecessors. Dr. Small is also a director of ATN and Meridian Energy Limited of which he is also Chairman of the Board. Dr. Small has 28 years of railroad management experience.
Directors Whose Terms Expire at the Annual Meeting in 2001
Class II Directors
Thomas E. Evans has served as a director of the Company since July 1998. Since 1999, Mr. Evans has been employed by Collins & Aikman in Troy, Michigan, where he currently serves as chairman and chief executive officer. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Evans was employed by Tenneco Automotive in Lake Forest, Illinois, where he served in senior management positions, most recently as its president. Prior to 1995 he served six years in various senior management positions with Case Corporation, two years with Federal-Mogul Corporation and fourteen years with Rockwell Internationals Automotive Operations.
Thomas F. Power, Jr. has served as a director of the Company since its formation in 1987. He also serves as a director of each of the Companys subsidiaries other than Algoma Central Railway Inc. (ACRI) and WC Canada Holdings, Inc. (WCCHI). Since September 1, 1999, Mr. Power has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. From 1987 to August 31, 1999, Mr. Power served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Power also serves as a director of Tranz Rail, ATN and EWS of which he is Chairman of the Board, a non-executive office. From 1970 to 1985, Mr. Power was employed by the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, most recently as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Power has over 32 years of railroad management experience.
Robert H. Wheeler has served as a director of the Company since its formation in 1987 and is also a director of each of the Companys subsidiaries other than ACRI and WCCHI. He was elected to the additional position of Chairman of the Board of the Company, a non-executive office, effective September 1, 1999. Mr. Wheeler also serves as a director of EWS and Tranz Rail of which he is Chairman of the Board, a non-executive office. Mr. Wheeler was a member of the law firm of Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly from December 1987 to August 1994 and was of counsel to that firm until 1999.
Directors Whose Terms Expire at the Annual Meeting in 2002
Class III Directors
Thomas W. Rissman has served as a director of the Company since January 1992 and is also a director of each of the Companys subsidiaries other than ACRI and WCCHI. Mr. Rissman also has served as Secretary of the Company, a non-executive office, since June 1991 and has served as General Counsel of the Company, a non-executive office, since September 1, 1999. Mr. Rissman also serves as a director of Tranz Rail, EWS and ATN. Mr. Rissman has been a member of the law firm of McLachlan, Rissman & Doll since December 1987.
John W. Rowe has served as a director of the Company since July 1998. Since March 1998, he has served as chairman, president and chief executive officer of Unicom Corporation in Chicago, Illinois. From 1989 to 1998, Mr. Rowe served as president, chief executive officer and a director of New England Electric System. From 1984 to 1989, he served as president and chief executive officer of Central Maine Power Company. Mr. Rowe served as senior vice president of law for Consolidated Rail Corporation from 1980 to 1984. Mr. Rowe began his career with the Chicago law firm of Isham, Lincoln and Beale
-11-
where he became a partner in 1978. Mr. Rowe also serves as a director of Fleet Boston Corporation and UNUM Provident Corporation.
One Class III directorship is currently vacant.
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information regarding each person who serves as one of our executive officers:
Age as of | ||||||
Name | March 20, 2000 | Position with Company | ||||
Thomas F. Power, Jr. | 59 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
J. Reilly McCarren | 43 | President and Chief Executive Officer, WCL, FV&W, | ||||
ACRI, SSM and WCLL | ||||||
Ronald G. Russ | 45 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
James E. Fisk | 47 | Executive Vice President-Corporate Development | ||||
John L. Bradshaw | 48 | Vice President- Corporate Development | ||||
Deborah M. Coady | 45 | Vice President-Human Resources and Claims | ||||
Janet H. Gilbert | 52 | Vice President-General Counsel, WCL, FV&W, ACRI, | ||||
SSM and WCLL | ||||||
Walter C. Kelly | 56 | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer; Chief | ||||
Financial Officer WCL, FV&W, ACRI, SSM and WCLL | ||||||
Glenn J. Kerbs | 59 | Vice President-Engineering, WCL, FV&W, ACRI and SSM | ||||
William R. Schauer | 55 | Vice President-Marketing, WCL, FV&W, ACRI and SSM | ||||
J. Edward Terbell | 47 | Vice President and General Manager, WCL, FV&W, | ||||
ACRI and SSM | ||||||
Robert F. Nadrowski | 53 | Vice President-Mechanical, WCL, FV&W, ACRI and SSM | ||||
Richard P. White | 54 | Vice President-Corporate Development | ||||
Marty J. Mickey | 37 | Treasurer |
Mr. Power has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since September 1999. Prior to September 1999, Mr. Power served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since our formation in 1987. Mr. Power is a director of the Company and each of our subsidiaries other than ACRI and WCCHI, and has served as such since 1987. Mr. Power also serves as a director of Tranz Rail and ATN, and is chairman of EWS. Mr. Power has 32 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. McCarren has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our North American operating subsidiaries since September 1999. From July 1996 to August 1999, Mr. McCarren served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of our North American operating subsidiaries. Mr. McCarren has served as a director of the Company since December 1998. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. McCarren served as President of Gateway Western Railway Company. From 1988 to 1990, Mr. McCarren served as the General Superintendent - Transportation for the Chicago, Missouri and Western Railway. Mr. McCarren has 21 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. Russ has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since September 1999. From May 1999 to September 1999, Mr. Russ served as Vice President of the Company. From January 1994 to April 1999, Mr. Russ served as Executive Manager and Chief Financial
-12-
Officer of Tranz Rail. Prior to serving at Tranz Rail, Mr. Russ served as our Treasurer from 1987 to 1993. Mr. Russ began his railroad career in 1973 and has 19 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. Fisk has served as Executive Vice President-Corporate Development of the Company since September 1999. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Fisk served as Engineering Director of EWS. Prior to serving at EWS, Mr. Fisk served as Mechanical Superintendent-Locomotive for our North American operating subsidiaries from 1987 to 1996. Mr. Fisk began his railroad career in 1970 and has 26 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. Bradshaw has served as Vice President-Corporate Development of the Company since June 1998. From June 1994 to June 1998, Mr. Bradshaw served as Group General Manager, Operations for Tranz Rail. From November 1993 to June 1994, Mr. Bradshaw served as General Manager, Rail Operations for Tranz Rail. Prior to serving at Tranz Rail, Mr. Bradshaw served as Vice President and General Manager of WCL from 1987 to November 1993. Mr. Bradshaw has 26 years of railroad management experience.
Ms. Coady has served as Vice President-Human Resources and Claims of the Company since November 1999. From 1996 to 1999, Ms. Coady served as Assistant Vice President, Human Resources of our North American operating subsidiaries. From 1993 to 1996, Ms. Coady served as Superintendent of Transportation of FV&Ws Fox Valley Division. Prior to joining our Company in 1993, Ms. Coady was employed by the Fox River Valley Railroad, most recently as Director of Human Resources.
Ms. Gilbert has served as Vice President-General Counsel of our North American operating subsidiaries since October 1999. From 1996 to 1999, Ms. Gilbert served as General Counsel of our North American operating subsidiaries. Prior to that time, Ms. Gilbert served as Assistant General Counsel of our North American operating subsidiaries since our formation in 1987. Ms. Gilbert began her legal career as trial counsel for the Federal Trade Commission and joined the railroad industry in 1983.
Mr. Kelly has served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company since September 1988. He serves as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our North American operating subsidiaries. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kelly served as Corporate Controller for Spiegel, Inc. (a catalog retailer) from 1987 to 1988, as an independent consultant during 1986, and as Vice President, Finance for Wilton Enterprises, Inc. (a distributor of housewares) during 1985.
Mr. Kerbs has served as Vice President-Engineering of our North American operating subsidiaries since 1987. From 1974 until 1987, Mr. Kerbs was employed by the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Corporation (CNW), most recently as Director of Maintenance Operations. Mr. Kerbs has 35 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. Schauer has served as Vice President-Marketing of our North American operating subsidiaries since October 1988, and served as Assistant Vice President, Marketing, of WCL from 1987 until October 1988. From 1986 until 1987, Mr. Schauer was employed by CNW as General Marketing Manager. Mr. Schauer has 25 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. Terbell has served as Vice President and General Manager of our North American operating subsidiaries since November 1993. Prior to that time, Mr. Terbell served as WCLs Eastern Division Transportation Manager since 1987. From 1973 until 1987, Mr. Terbell was employed by CNW, most recently as Assistant Division Manager-Engineering. Mr. Terbell has 25 years of railroad management experience.
-13-
Mr. Nadrowski has served as Vice President - Mechanical of our North American operating subsidiaries since 1987. From 1985 until 1987, Mr. Nadrowski was involved in the ownership and operation of a marina and a motel in Wisconsin. Mr. Nadrowski has 29 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. White has served as Vice President - Corporate Development of the Company since November 1999. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. White served as Vice President - Human Resources of our Company. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. White held a variety of positions with Tranz Rail and its predecessors from 1962 to 1996, most recently as Executive Manager, Personnel. Mr. White has 28 years of railroad management experience.
Mr. Mickey has served as Treasurer of the Company and its subsidiaries since May 1996. Prior to that time, Mr. Mickey served as Assistant Controller of WCL from 1990 to 1996. From 1984 to 1990, Mr. Mickey was employed by Arthur Andersen & Co., most recently as audit manager.
The executive officers of the Company are elected annually by and serve at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors.
Committees, Meetings and Compensation
Committees of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors of the Company currently maintains an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Finance Committee. The Board of Directors does not maintain a Nominating Committee.
The Executive Committee is authorized to meet between meetings of the Board of Directors and, except as restricted by law, possesses the authority to act for and on behalf of the Board of Directors. The members of the Executive Committee are Robert H. Wheeler (Chairman), Carl Ferenbach and Thomas F. Power, Jr.
The Audit Committee is an oversight committee which assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities to the stockholders and the public markets. The Audit Committee is responsible for ensuring that the Company employs independent and objective auditors. Together with the independent auditors and the Companys internal audit department, the Audit Committee reviews managements preparation of financial information, the presence of internal controls and audit processes to deter fraud, and managements procedures to anticipate financial risks and promote accurate, high quality and timely disclosure of financial and other material information to the Board of Directors, to the public markets and to the stockholders. The Audit Committees primary duties and responsibilities are to assess the processes related to the Companys risk and control environment, oversee financial reporting and evaluate internal and independent audit processes. In January 2000, the Audit Committee adopted a formal written charter, a copy of which is attached as Appendix D, which guides the Audit Committee in carrying out the duties described above. Under the charter, members of the audit committee are required to be independent (as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealers listing standards) from and after June 14, 2001. Currently two members of the audit committee are, and one is not, independent (as so defined). The members of the Audit Committee are Roland V. McPherson (Chairman), John W. Rowe and Thomas W. Rissman. No member of the Audit Committee is an executive officer of the Company.
The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors as to the salaries and other compensation of all elected officers and as to the benefit plans for all Company
-14-
employees. The members of the Compensation Committee are Thomas E. Evans (Chairman), Robert H. Wheeler and Carl Ferenbach. No member of the Compensation Committee is an executive officer of the Company.
The Finance Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and is given specific authority by the Board of Directors from time to time to act on behalf of the Board of Directors in approving certain matters relating to the issuance of securities by the Company. The members of the Finance Committee are Carl Ferenbach (Chairman), Thomas W. Rissman and Robert H. Wheeler.
Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees. During 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company met eight times, the Audit Committee met four times and the Compensation Committee met four times. The Finance Committee and the Executive Committee did not meet.
Compensation of Directors. Under compensation arrangements adopted in 1999, directors of the Company who are not full-time employees of the Company or its subsidiaries receive annual compensation in the form of options to purchase 6,000 shares of Common Stock and may elect to receive annual compensation of $30,000 in either (i) phantom stock or (ii) $15,000 cash and $15,000 in phantom stock, with the phantom stock payable on the date of the Companys annual meeting and the cash payable in four equal quarterly installments. In addition, the Company pays compensation of $120,000 per year to Mr. Wheeler for his services as Chairman of the Board. No additional amounts are paid with respect to attendance at director or committee meetings. Directors who are full-time employees of the Company or its subsidiaries do not receive additional compensation for their services as directors.
The director options represent the right to purchase Common Stock at an exercise price equal to fair market value as of the date of the grant. Director options expire at the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or one year after the optionee ceases to be a director.
The director phantom stock is issued in units equal to the aggregate nominal value divided by the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. When the holder of phantom stock ceases to be a director of the Company, the holders phantom stock units are converted to cash at the current market value of the Common Stock.
In 1999, directors Thomas E. Evans and John W. Rowe were each granted 5,500 additional options in connection with their first election as directors, as provided by the director option plan. In 1999 Robert H. Wheeler was granted 10,000 additional options (under the Companys Long-Term Incentive Plan) and received $30,000 as additional cash compensation for serving as Chairman of the Board beginning on September 1, 1999.
Executive Compensation
Summary of Compensation. The following table summarizes the total compensation for services rendered to the Company during each of the last three fiscal years of (i) all individuals serving as the Companys Chief Executive Officer during 1999, (ii) the Companys four mostly highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO who were serving as executive officers at the end of 1999, and (iii) one additional individual for whom disclosure would have been provided as one of the four most highly compensated executive officers but for the fact that he was not serving as an executive officer of the Company at the end of 1999. The individuals listed below in the Summary Compensation Table are hereinafter referred to together as the Named Executive Officers.
-15-
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Compensation | Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus($)(1) | (Shares) | Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Power, Jr., | 1999 | 484,750 | 124,096 | 55,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
President & Chief | 1998 | 430,000 | 285,950 | 6,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer (2) | 1997 | 388,500 | 87,490 | 6,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
J. Reilly McCarren, | 1999 | 258,333 | 66,133 | 99,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
President & Chief Executive | 1998 | 225,000 | 149,625 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Officer of North American | 1997 | 204,000 | 45,941 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
operating subsidiaries (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William R. Schauer, | 1999 | 155,000 | 41,230 | 10,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vice President-Marketing | 1998 | 150,000 | 79,050 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
of North American operating | 1997 | 141,600 | 25,516 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walter C. Kelly, | 1999 | 155,000 | 39,680 | 10,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vice President & Chief | 1998 | 150,000 | 79,050 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Accounting Officer | 1997 | 141,000 | 25,408 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Glenn J. Kerbs, | 1999 | 160,000 | 32,800 | 10,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vice President-Engineering | 1998 | 153,000 | 80,631 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
of North American operating | 1997 | 145,800 | 26,273 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edward A. Burkhardt, | 1999 | 367,500 | | 140,000 | (4) | 2,627,841 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||
Chairman, President & Chief | 1998 | 525,000 | 349,125 | 6,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer until 8/31/99 | 1997 | 472,000 | 106,294 | 6,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Earl J. Currie, | 1999 | 141,989 | | 28,000 | (6) | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vice President-Planning | 1998 | 160,000 | 84,320 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
until 11/8/99 | 1997 | 153,000 | 27,571 | | |
(1) | Annual bonus amounts were earned and accrued during the fiscal years indicated and paid after the end of each applicable fiscal year. | |
(2) | Mr. Power has held this position since September 1, 1999. Prior to that date he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. | |
(3) | Mr. McCarren has held this position since September 1, 1999. Prior to that date he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the North American operating subsidiaries. | |
(4) | Mr. Burkhardt was granted 70,000 options on January 5, 1999 which lapsed upon his resignation from the Company and were replaced by a grant of 70,000 options on July 7, 1999. | |
(5) | The Company paid Mr. Burkhardt $1,462,497 in 1999 and accrued $1,165,344 to be paid in future periods in connection with his resignation from the Company. | |
(6) | Mr. Curries option for 28,000 shares lapsed upon his resignation from the Company. |
-16-
Stock Option Grants in 1999. The following table sets forth information concerning the grant of stock options during 1999 to the Named Executive Officers.
Option Grants In Last Fiscal Year
Potential | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Realizable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Value at | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | of Total | Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | Options | Annual Rates of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Under- | Granted to | Stock Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Lying | Employees | Exercise | Appreciation for | |||||||||||||||||||||
Options | in | Price | Option Term (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Granted | Fiscal Year | ($ Per | Expiration | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name | (Shares) | 1999(%) | Share) | Date | 5%($) | 10%($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Power, Jr. | 55,000 | 5.7 | 16.625 | 01/04/09 | 575,025 | 1,457,278 | ||||||||||||||||||
J. Reilly McCarren | 99,000 | 10.4 | 16.625 | 01/04/09 | 1,035,045 | 2,623,101 | ||||||||||||||||||
William R. Schauer | 10,000 | 1.0 | 16.625 | 01/04/09 | 104,550 | 264,960 | ||||||||||||||||||
Walter C. Kelly | 10,000 | 1.0 | 16.625 | 01/04/09 | 104,550 | 264,960 | ||||||||||||||||||
Glenn J. Kerbs | 10,000 | 1.0 | 16.625 | 01/04/09 | 104,550 | 264,960 | ||||||||||||||||||
Edward A. Burkhardt (2) | 70,000 | 7.3 | 16.625 | 08/31/00 | 67,561 | 136,010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Edward A. Burkhardt (2) | 70,000 | 7.3 | 16.625 | lapsed | n/a-lapsed | n/a-lapsed | ||||||||||||||||||
Earl J. Currie (2) | 28,000 | 2.9 | 16.625 | lapsed | n/a-lapsed | n/a-lapsed |
(1) | Potential realizable value is based on an assumption that the stock price appreciates from the stated exercise price at the annual rate shown (compounded annually) from the date of grant until the end of the option term. These numbers are calculated based on the requirements promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not reflect the Companys estimate of future stock price. | |
(2) | Mr. Burkhardt was granted 70,000 options on January 5, 1999 which lapsed upon his resignation from the Company and were replaced by a grant of 70,000 options on July 7, 1999; and Mr. Curries option lapsed upon his resignation from the Company on November 8, 1999. |
Option Exercises and Year-End Value of Options. The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of stock options during 1999, and the year-end value of unexercised options, for the Named Executive Officers.
Aggregated Option Exercises In Last Fiscal Year
And Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Number of Securities | Value of Unexercised | |||||||||||||||
Underlying Unexercised | In-the-Money Options at | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Options at 12/31/99 | 12/31/99 ($) (1) | ||||||||||||||
Acquired on | Value | |||||||||||||||
Name | Exercise | Realized | Exercisable | Unexercisable | Exercisable | Unexercisable | ||||||||||
Thomas F. Power, Jr. | | | 85,000 | | 8,625 | | ||||||||||
J. Reilly McCarren | | | 189,000 | | | | ||||||||||
William R. Schauer | | | 40,000 | | 525 | | ||||||||||
Walter C. Kelly | | | 40,000 | | 525 | | ||||||||||
Glenn J. Kerbs | | | 40,000 | | 525 | | ||||||||||
Edward A. Burkhardt | | | 100,000 | | 8,625 | | ||||||||||
Earl J. Currie | | | | | | |
(1) | Based on the closing price of one share of Common Stock on December 31, 1999 ($13.4375) less the exercise price. |
-17-
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Robert H. Wheeler, a member of the Compensation Committee, was of counsel, during part of 1999, to Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, which has provided legal and other services to the Company in connection with various labor matters, litigation, regulatory issues and corporate and acquisition issues since shortly after the Companys formation and continues to provide such services to the Company. Mr. Wheeler received 10,000 options and $30,000 during 1999, as compensation for his service as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company beginning September 1, 1999.
Transactions With Management And Others
Affiliates of Berkshire Partners LLC (Berkshire), of which Carl Ferenbach is an executive officer, director and beneficial owner, granted the Company options to purchase up to 332,750 shares of ATN, in connection with the investments by both the Company and Berkshire in ATN in November 1997, in December 1999 and in June 2000. The options may be exercised at any time prior to November 14, 2002 and currently have an exercise price of A$1.11 per share or A$369,353 in the aggregate (approximately US$195,018 at current exchange rates). The exercise price increases approximately 3.5% at each November 14th.
Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, to which Robert H. Wheeler was of counsel during part of 1999, has provided legal and other services to the Company in connection with various labor matters, litigation, regulatory issues and corporate and acquisition issues since shortly after the Companys formation. The Company paid OW&D $1,028,000 during 1999. Mr. Wheeler received 10,000 options and $30,000 during 1999 and $90,000 during the first nine months of 2000, as compensation for his service as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company beginning September 1, 1999.
McLachlan, Rissman & Doll, of which Thomas W. Rissman is a member, has provided legal and other services to the Company in connection with various corporate, acquisition and financing matters since December 1, 1987 and continues to provide such services to the Company. The Company paid MRD $828,000 during 1999 and $675,000 during the first nine months of 2000.
Railroad Financial Corporation, of which Thomas W. Rissman and Roland V. McPherson are directors, was paid $200,000 during the first nine months of 2000 for financial advisory services in connection with equipment leasing transactions.
Tranz Rail, of which five directors of the Company are directors and hold shares and options, is party to a Management Services Agreement with the Company under which the Company provides management services to Tranz Rail. The amounts earned by the Company for services under the Tranz Rail Management Services Agreement were $534,000 in 1999 and $245,000 in the first nine months of 2000.
EWS, of which four directors of the Company are directors and hold shares and options, is party to a Management Services Agreement with the Company under which the Company provides management services to EWS. The amounts earned by the Company for services under the EWS Management Services Agreement were $1,998,000 in 1999 and $1,301,000 in the first nine months of 2000.
-18-
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Companys Common Stock (i) by each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) by each director, (iii) by each of the Named Executive Officers and (iv) by all current directors and executive officers as a group. Except as indicated in notes to the table and except for beneficial owners whose Form 13F filings are the source of the Companys information, each beneficial owner listed in the table has advised the Company or indicated in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that such owner has sole dispositive and voting power with respect to the shares of Common Stock indicated. The information in the table is provided based on information known to the Company as of October 23, 2000.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | |||||||||||||
Name | Number | Percent | |||||||||||
Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. (2) | 7,909,300 | 17.0 | |||||||||||
State of Wisconsin Investment Board (3) | 4,045,000 | 8.7 | |||||||||||
Cascade Investment L.L.C. (4) | 3,600,300 | 7.8 | |||||||||||
Edward A. Burkhardt (5) | 3,510,004 | 7.6 | |||||||||||
Tweedy, Browne Company LLC (6) | 2,704,391 | 5.8 | |||||||||||
Capital Research & Management Company (7) | 2,525,000 | 5.4 | |||||||||||
Thomas F. Power, Jr. (8) | 1,031,418 | 2.2 | |||||||||||
Robert H. Wheeler | 539,448 | 1.2 | |||||||||||
Roland V. McPherson | 519,582 | 1.1 | |||||||||||
J. Reilly McCarren | 261,700 | * | |||||||||||
Glenn J. Kerbs | 250,844 | * | |||||||||||
Walter C. Kelly | 143,306 | * | |||||||||||
William R. Schauer | 142,433 | * | |||||||||||
Thomas W. Rissman (9) | 128,514 | * | |||||||||||
Carl Ferenbach | 116,926 | * | |||||||||||
A. Francis Small (10) | 48,000 | * | |||||||||||
John W. Rowe (11) | 36,000 | * | |||||||||||
Thomas E. Evans | 35,000 | * | |||||||||||
Earl J. Currie (12) | 2,790 | * | |||||||||||
Directors and current executive officers as a group | |||||||||||||
(21 persons) (13) | 4,855,613 | 10.3 |
* | Percentage beneficially owned does not exceed 1%. | |
(1) | Any shares of Common Stock which a person has the right to acquire through exercise of options exercisable within 60 days after October 23, 2000 are considered to be outstanding for purposes of this table. Listed stockholders have such options to acquire shares of Common Stock in the following numbers: Mr. Burkhardt: 30,000; Mr. Power: 85,000; Mr. Wheeler: 52,000; Mr. McPherson: 42,000; Mr. McCarren: 189,000; Mr. Kerbs: 40,000; Mr. Kelly: 40,000; Mr. Schauer: 40,000; Mr. Rissman: 42,000; Mr. Ferenbach: 42,000; Dr. Small: 36,000; Mr. Rowe: 30,000; and Mr. Evans: 30,000. | |
(2) | According to a Schedule 13G filed as of February 9, 2000 with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. (Southeastern), Longleaf Partners Small Cap-Fund (Longleaf) and Longleaf Partners International Fund (Longleaf International) which indicates that Southeastern has sole voting power with respect to 676,500 of these shares, |
-19-
sole dispositive power with respect to 1,208,500 of these shares, shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 6,700,800 of these shares, and no voting power with respect to 532,000 of these shares; and Longleaf has no sole voting or sole dispositive power with respect to these shares but has shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 5,550,800 of these shares; and Longleaf International has no sole voting or sole dispositive power with respect to these shares but has shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,150,000 of these shares. The address of Southeastern, Longleaf and Longleaf International is 6410 Poplar Ave., Suite 900, Memphis, Tennessee 38119. | ||
(3) | According to a Form 13F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of July 20, 2000. The address of the State of Wisconsin Investment Board is P.O. Box 7842, 121 East Wilson Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53707. | |
(4) | According to a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Cascade Investment L.L.C. as of April 28, 2000 which indicates that Cascade Investment L.L.C. and William H. Gates III each have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to these shares. The address of Cascade Investment L.L.C. is 2365 Carillon Point, Kirkland, Washington 98033. | |
(5) | The number of shares shown for Mr. Burkhardt is based on the Companys records of registered holders of shares and options. According to the Companys records, Mr. Burkhardts address is 573 Earlston Road, Kenilworth, Illinois 60043-1014. | |
(6) | According to a Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of October 10, 2000 by Tweedy, Browne Company LLC, TBK Partners, L.P. and Vanderbilt Partners, L.P., which indicates that Tweedy, Browne Company LLC has sole voting power with respect to 2,628,599 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,704,931 shares, TBK Partners, L.P. has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 348,000 shares and Vanderbilt Partners, L.P. has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 46,280 shares. The address of each of Tweedy, Browne Company LLC, TBK Partners, L.P. and Vanderbilt Partners, L.P. is 350 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10022. | |
(7) | According to a Form 13F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Capital Research & Management Company as of August 15, 2000. The address of Capital Research & Management Company is 333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071-1447. | |
(8) | Includes 57,000 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Powers spouse who has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to those 57,000 shares. | |
(9) | Mr. Rissman serves as one of three co-trustees who have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,016,316 shares held by the Mary Cynthia K. McLachlan Trust. | |
(10) | Dr. Small reports that he has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to these shares. | |
(11) | Includes 2,000 shares held by Mr. Rowes spouse who has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to those 2,000 shares. | |
(12) | The number of shares shown for Mr. Currie is based on the Companys records of his Section 16 filings. | |
(13) | Includes (i) the 57,000 shares owned by Mr. Powers spouse and referred to in Note 8, (ii) the 1,016,316 shares owned by the Mary Cynthia K. McLachlan Trust and referred to in Note 9, (iii) the 2,000 shares owned by Mr. Rowes spouse and referred to in Note 11, and (iv) 916,200 shares which directors and executive officers have the right to acquire through exercise of options within 60 days after October 23, 2000. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Companys directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Companys Common Stock (collectively Reporting Persons) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Reporting Persons are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms which they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received or written representations from certain Reporting Persons, the Company believes
-20-
that during 1999 all Reporting Persons complied with all applicable filing requirements, except that Mr. Ferenbach filed later than required a Form 5 for 1998, and as of October 25, 2000, Messrs. Burkhardt and Currie had not filed a Form 5 for 1999.
PARTICIPANTS IN THE SOLICITATION
Under applicable regulations of the SEC, the Company, the members of the Board, certain executive officers of the Company, certain other employees of the Company and certain other persons may each be deemed to be a participant in the Companys solicitation of revocations of consent. Information about the principal occupations of directors and executive officers is set forth under the section entitled Certain Information Regarding the Companys Directors and Executive Officers. Additional information about the directors, certain executive officers, certain other employees and others who may be deemed to be participants is set forth on Appendix B. Information about the present ownership of the Companys securities by directors and named executive officers of WCTC is provided in Principal Stockholders. Information about the other participants present ownership of the Companys securities is also listed on Appendix B. Information about all transactions in the Companys securities within the past two years by each of the participants is provided in Appendix C.
SOLICITATION OF REVOCATIONS
The cost of the solicitation of revocations of consent will be borne by WCTC. WCTC estimates that the total expenditures in connection with such solicitation (including the fees and expenses of WCTCs attorneys, public relations advisers and solicitors, advertising, printing, mailing, travel and other costs, but excluding salaries and wages of officers and employees), will be approximately $ , of which $ has been spent to date. In addition to the Boards solicitation by mail, directors, officers and other WCTC employees may, without additional compensation, solicit revocations by mail, in person, by telecommunication or by other electronic means.
WCTC has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. (D.F. King), at an estimated fee of $125,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the solicitation of revocations, as well as to assist WCTC with its communications with its stockholders with respect to, and to provide other services to WCTC in connection with, WCTCs opposition to the Burkhardt Solicitation. Approximately 50 persons will be utilized by D.F. King in its efforts. WCTC will reimburse brokerage houses, banks, custodians and other nominees and fiduciaries for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in forwarding WCTCs consent revocation materials to, and obtaining instructions relating to such materials from, beneficial owners of Common Stock. WCTC has agreed to indemnify D.F. King against certain liabilities and expenses in connection with its engagement, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws.
FINANCIAL ADVISOR
On October 8, 1999, WCTC engaged Goldman Sachs & Co. (Goldman Sachs) to assist it in responding to any unsolicited acquisition proposals it might receive or any other unsolicited attempts to acquire control of the Company by way of a merger, tender offer, purchase of all or a portion of the assets or stock of the Company, any contested solicitation of proxies or otherwise. For these services, Goldman Sachs is paid an annual retainer fee of $50,000. In addition, WCTC has retained Goldman Sachs to act as its financial advisor in connection with the solicitation for which it will receive $500,000.
-21-
Goldman Sachs is an investment banking and advisory firm that provides a range of financial services for institutional and individual clients. Goldman Sachs has represented the Company in many transactions in the past having served as lead underwriter for WCTCs initial and secondary public stock offerings in 1991 and 1993, respectively, as well as its $150 million public debt issuance in 1998. Goldman Sachs also served as lead underwriter for Tranz Rail, a WCTC affiliate, in its initial and secondary public stock offerings in 1996 and 1997, respectively. Goldman Sachs also owns approximately 4% of the shares of EWS, a WCTC affiliate, on an undiluted basis and beneficially owns approximately 7% of such shares on a diluted basis.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2001 ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the Company must be received by the Company no later than the close of business December 31, 2000 to be eligible for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2001 annual meeting. Any stockholder proposal received after the close of business December 31, 2000 will be considered untimely and will not be eligible for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2001 annual meeting.
For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement for the 2001 annual meeting (as described in the preceding paragraph) but is instead sought to be presented directly at the 2001 annual meeting, Securities and Exchange Commission rules permit management to vote proxies in its discretion if the Company (a) receives notice of the proposal before the close of business on February 26, 2001 and advises stockholders in next years proxy statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on such matter, or (b) does not receive notice of the proposal prior to the close of business on February 26, 2001.
IMPORTANT
1. If your shares are registered in your own names, please sign, date and promptly mail the enclosed BLUE Consent Revocation Card in the postage-paid envelope provided. Do NOT return any white consent card sent to you by the Burkhardt Group.
2. If you have previously signed and returned a WHITE consent card to the Burkhardt Group, you have every right to change your vote. Only your latest dated card will count. You may revoke any WHITE consent card already sent to the Burkhardt Group by signing, dating and mailing the enclosed BLUE Consent Revocation Card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
3. If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank nominee or other institution, only it can sign a BLUE Consent Revocation Card with respect to your shares and only after receiving your specific instructions. To ensure that your shares are voted, you should also contact the person responsible for your account and give instructions for a BLUE Consent Revocation Card to be issued representing your shares.
4. After signing the enclosed BLUE Consent Revocation Card, do not sign or return the WHITE consent card. Do not even use the Burkhardt Groups WHITE consent card or any other forms sent to you by the Burkhardt Group to indicate your opposition to the Burkhardt Proposals.
-22-
If you have any questions about giving your revocation of consent or require assistance, please call:
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
77 Water Street
New York, NY 10005
Call Toll-Free
1-800-769-4414
By Order of the Board of Directors, | |
THOMAS W. RISSMAN Secretary |
-23-
Appendix A
FORM OF BURKHARDT GROUP PROPOSALS
BURKHARDT PROPOSAL 1:
The By-laws of the Company currently provide that the Companys Board of Directors will be divided into three classes elected to serve for staggered terms of three years. Burkhardt Proposal 1 provides for the amendment of Section 3.2 of the By-laws to remove the provision establishing a classified Board and to require the annual election of all directors.
BURKHARDT PROPOSAL 2:
Burkhardt Proposal 2 provides for the amendment of Section 3.3 of the By-laws to recognize the elimination of the classified Board of Directors by deleting the second and third sentences and inserting in lieu thereof the sentence Any director elected in accordance with this paragraph shall hold office until the next annual meeting of the shareholders or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal in a manner permitted by statute or these by-laws.
BURKHARDT PROPOSAL 3:
Burkhardt Proposal 3 provides for the elimination of Section 3.13 of the By-laws in its entirety. This section currently provides that, so long as the Companys Board of Directors is classified, members of the Board may be removed from office only for cause by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast for the election of directors. The elimination of Section 3.13 of the By-laws will permit the shareholders of the Company to remove Board members with or without cause.
BURKHARDT PROPOSAL 4:
Burkhardt Proposal 4 provides for the removal of the nine current members of the Companys Board of Directors, Thomas E. Evans, Carl Ferenbach, J. Reilly McCarren, Roland V. McPherson, Thomas F. Power, Jr., Thomas W. Rissman, John W. Rowe, A. Francis Small and Robert H. Wheeler, and any other person or persons who may be members of the Company Board at the time the Burkhardt Proposals become effective (other than the persons elected as a result of the adoption of Burkhardt Proposal 5, which is described below).
BURKHARDT PROPOSAL 5:
Burkhardt Proposal 5 provides for the election of John W. Barriger, Edward A. Burkhardt, Raymond C. Burton, Jr., Robert E. Dowdy, Aaron J. Gellman, Michael W. Howell, Henry Posner III and Andy Sze as directors of Wisconsin Central, to serve until the Companys next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.
-24-
BURKHARDT PROPOSAL 6:
Burkhardt Proposal 6 provides for the repeal of any amendments of the By-laws (whether effected by supplement to, deletion from or revision of the By-laws) adopted subsequent to May 20, 1999, and at or prior to the time the Proposals become effective (other than amendments adopted as a result of the adoption of Burkhardt Proposals 1, 2 or 3 set forth above).
-25-
Appendix B
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF WCTC AND CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF WCTC AND OTHER
PARTICIPANTS WHO MAY ALSO SOLICIT REVOCATIONS OF CONSENT
The following table sets forth the name, principal business address and the present office or other principal occupation or employment, and the name, principal business and the address of any corporation or other organization in which such employment is carried on, of the directors and certain executive officers of WCTC and certain employees and other representatives of WCTC who may also solicit revocations of consents from stockholders of WCTC. Unless otherwise indicated, the principal occupation refers to such persons position with WCTC.
Directors
The principal occupations of the Companys directors who are deemed participants in the solicitation are set forth under Certain Information Concerning the Companys Directors and Executive Officers-Directors in this Consent Revocation Statement. The name and business address of the director-participants organization of employment are as follows:
Name | Address | |
Robert H. Wheeler | Two Prudential Plaza | |
180 North Stetson Avenue | ||
Suite 3125 | ||
Chicago, Illinois 60601 | ||
Thomas E. Evans | Collins & Aikman | |
5755 New King Court | ||
Troy, Michigan 48098 | ||
Carl Ferenbach | Berkshire Partners | |
One Boston Place | ||
Suite 3300 | ||
Boston, Massachusetts 02108 | ||
J. Reilly McCarren | Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation | |
One OHare Centre | ||
Suite 9000 | ||
6250 North River Road | ||
Rosemont, Illinois 60018 | ||
Roland V. McPherson | Asset Acquisition & Management Company | |
10660 West 143rd Street | ||
Suite E, Lower Level | ||
Orland Park, Illinois 60462-0157 |
-26-
Thomas F. Power, Jr. | Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation | |
One OHare Centre | ||
Suite 9000 | ||
6250 North River Road | ||
Rosemont, Illinois 60018 | ||
Thomas W. Rissman | McLachlan, Rissman & Doll | |
676 North Michigan Avenue | ||
Suite 2800 | ||
Chicago, Illinois 60611 | ||
John W. Rowe | UNICOM Corporation | |
One First National Plaza | ||
37th Floor | ||
Chicago, Illinois 60690 | ||
A. Francis Small | Level 5 | |
AXON House | ||
1 Willeston Street | ||
Wellington | ||
New Zealand |
Executive Officers and Management
The principal occupation of the Companys executive officers and certain other members of management and employees who are deemed participants in the solicitation are set forth below. The principal business address of each person listed below is Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation, One OHare Centre, Suite 9000, 6250 North River Road, Rosemont, Illinois 60018.
Name | Principal Occupation | |
Ronald G. Russ | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer | |
Ann G. Thoma | Assistant Vice President Corporate Relations |
Information Regarding Ownership of the Companys Securities by Participants
Except as described in this Appendix B or in the Consent Revocation Statement, none of the participants owns any of the Companys securities of record but not beneficially. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by directors is set forth under Principal Stockholders in this Consent Revocation Statement. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the other participants is set forth below:
Name | Share Ownership | |
Ronald G. Russ | 92,069 | |
Ann G. Thoma | 13,600 |
-27-
Information concerning stock options held by the directors and other participants is set forth below.
Number of Shares | |||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Covered by Option | Exercise Price | ||||||||||
Robert H. Wheeler | May 20, 1994 | 6,000 | 12.000 | ||||||||||
May 19, 1995 | 6,000 | 17.083 | |||||||||||
May 17, 1996 | 6,000 | 30.833 | |||||||||||
May 16, 1997 | 6,000 | 33.188 | |||||||||||
May 22, 1998 | 6,000 | 22.563 | |||||||||||
May 21, 1999 | 6,000 | 21.750 | |||||||||||
September 1, 1999 | 10,000 | 15.938 | |||||||||||
May 19, 2000 | 6,000 | 12.813 | |||||||||||
Thomas E. Evans | December 24, 1998 | 12,500 | 20.531 | ||||||||||
May 21, 1999 | 11,500 | 21.750 | |||||||||||
May 19, 2000 | 6,000 | 12.813 | |||||||||||
Carl Ferenbach | May 20, 1994 | 6,000 | 12.000 | ||||||||||
May 19, 1995 | 6,000 | 17.083 | |||||||||||
May 17, 1996 | 6,000 | 30.833 | |||||||||||
May 16, 1997 | 6,000 | 33.188 | |||||||||||
May 22, 1998 | 6,000 | 22.563 | |||||||||||
May 21, 1999 | 6,000 | 21.750 | |||||||||||
May 19, 2000 | 6,000 | 12.813 | |||||||||||
J. Reilly McCarren | July 8, 1996 | 90,000 | 31.500 | ||||||||||
January 5, 1999 | 99,000 | 16.625 | |||||||||||
January 4, 2000 | 40,000 | 13.000 | |||||||||||
Roland V. McPherson | May 20, 1994 | 6,000 | 12.000 | ||||||||||
May 19, 1995 | 6,000 | 17.083 | |||||||||||
May 17, 1996 | 6,000 | 30.833 | |||||||||||
May 16, 1997 | 6,000 | 33.188 | |||||||||||
May 22, 1998 | 6,000 | 22.563 | |||||||||||
May 21, 1999 | 6,000 | 21.750 | |||||||||||
May 19, 2000 | 6,000 | 12.813 | |||||||||||
Thomas F. Power, Jr. | May 20, 1994 | 6,000 | 12.000 | ||||||||||
May 19, 1995 | 6,000 | 17.083 | |||||||||||
May 17, 1996 | 6,000 | 30.833 | |||||||||||
May 16, 1997 | 6,000 | 33.188 | |||||||||||
May 22, 1998 | 6,000 | 22.563 | |||||||||||
January 5, 1999 | 55,000 | 16.625 | |||||||||||
January 4, 2000 | 100,000 | 13.000 | |||||||||||
Thomas W. Rissman | May 20, 1994 | 6,000 | 12.000 |
-28-
May 19, 1995 | 6,000 | 17.083 | ||||||||||
May 17, 1996 | 6,000 | 30.833 | ||||||||||
May 16, 1997 | 6,000 | 33.188 | ||||||||||
May 22, 1998 | 6,000 | 22.563 | ||||||||||
May 21, 1999 | 6,000 | 21.750 | ||||||||||
May 19, 2000 | 6,000 | 12.813 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
John W. Rowe | December 24, 1998 | 12,500 | 20.531 | |||||||||
May 21, 1999 | 11,500 | 21.750 | ||||||||||
May 19, 2000 | 6,000 | 12.813 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
A. Francis Small | May 16, 1997 | 18,000 | 33.188 | |||||||||
May 22, 1998 | 6,000 | 22.563 | ||||||||||
May 21, 1999 | 6,000 | 21.750 | ||||||||||
May 19, 2000 | 6,000 | 12.813 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Ronald G. Russ | September 1, 1999 | 20,000 | 15.938 | |||||||||
January 4, 2000 | 27,000 | 13.000 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Ann G. Thoma | December 2, 1998 | 20,000 | 17.625 | |||||||||
January 4, 2000 | 7,400 | 13.000 |
Miscellaneous Information Concerning Participants
Except as described in this Appendix B or in the Consent Revocation Statement, none of the participants nor any of their respective affiliates or associates (together, the Participant Affiliates), directly or indirectly beneficially owns any shares of Common Stock of the Company or any securities of any subsidiary of the Company. Furthermore, except as described in this Appendix B or in the Consent Revocation Statement, no Participant Affiliate is either a party to any transaction or series of transactions since January 1, 1999, or has knowledge of any currently proposed transaction or series of transactions, (i) to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was or is to be a party, (ii) in which the amount involved exceeds $60,000, and (iii) in which any Participant Affiliate had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest.
Except as described in this Appendix B or in the Consent Revocation Statement, no Participant Affiliate has entered into any agreement or understanding with any person respecting any future employment by the Company or its affiliates or any future transactions to which the Company or any of its affiliates will or may be a party. Except as described in this Appendix B or in the Consent Revocation Statement, there are no contracts, arrangement or understandings by any Participant Affiliate within the past year with any person with respect to the Companys securities.
-29-
Appendix C
INFORMATION CONCERNING CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS IN WCTCS SECURITIES
WITHIN THE PAST TWO YEARS
The following table sets forth all purchases and sales of WCTCs securities by the participants referred to above during the last two years:
Number of Shares | |||
Name | Purchased (Or Sold) | Date of Purchase or Sale | |
Thomas E. Evans | 4,000 | March 12, 1999 | |
| |||
J. Reilly McCarren | 2,000 | March 25, 1999 | |
5,000 | November 8, 1999 | ||
1,200 | November 9, 1999 | ||
5,000 | November 10, 1999 | ||
500 | November 12, 1999 | ||
4,400 | November 23, 1999 | ||
1,600 | December 13, 1999 | ||
2,000 | December 14 ,1999 | ||
1,600 | December 20, 1999 | ||
| |||
Roland V. McPherson | (15,000) | November 9, 1998 | |
| |||
A. Francis Small | 3,000 | December 14, 1999 | |
| |||
Robert H. Wheeler | (14,552) | May 14, 1999 | |
| |||
Ann G. Thoma | 2,800 | November 23, 1998 | |
3,800 | February 24, 1999 |
-30-
Appendix D
WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Purpose
The Audit Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors of Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation (Company) is an oversight committee which assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities to the shareholders and the public markets. The Committee is responsible for ensuring that the Company employs independent and objective auditors. Together with the independent auditor and the internal auditor, the Committee reviews managements preparation of financial information, the presence of internal controls and audit processes to deter fraud, and managements procedures to anticipate financial risks and promote accurate, high quality and timely disclosure of financial and other material information to the board, to the public markets and to the shareholders. The Committees primary duties and responsibilities are to:
| Assess the processes related to the Companys risk and control environment. | |
| Oversee financial reporting. | |
| Evaluate internal and independent audit processes. |
Composition
The Committee shall be comprised of at least three independent directors who shall be appointed by the Board of Directors. One director who is not independent may be appointed to the audit committee if the Board determines that membership on the committee by the individual is required by the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. If such appointment is made, the Board shall disclose in the next annual proxy statement the nature of the relationship and the reasons for the determination. The directors appointed shall be free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a member of the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, none of the directors appointed to the Committee need be independent directors prior to June 14, 2001.
The Committee adopts the definition of independent director found in NASDAQ Rule 4200 which is:
"Independent director means a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the companys board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The following persons shall not be considered independent: |
-31-
(a) a director who is employed by the corporation or any of its affiliates for the current year or any of the past three years; |
(b) a director who accepts any compensation from the corporation or any of its affiliates in excess of $60,000 during the previous fiscal year, other than compensation for board service, benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation; |
(c) a director who is a member of the immediate family of an individual who is, or has been in any of the past three years, employed by the corporation or any of its affiliates as an executive officer. Immediate family includes a persons spouse, parents, children, siblings, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and anyone who resides in such persons home; |
(d) a director who is a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any for-profit business organization to which the corporation made, or from which the corporation received, payments (other than those arising solely from investments in the corporations securities) that exceed 5% of the corporations or business organizations consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, in any of the past three years; |
(e) a director who is employed as an executive of another entity where any of the companys executives serve that entitys compensation committee. |
Committee members shall be appointed annually at the meeting of the Board of Directors immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Board of Directors shall designate one member of the Committee to serve as the Chairman. All members of the Committee shall have a working familiarity with basic finance and accounting practices such that they are able to read and understand the Companys balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. At least one member of the Committee shall have past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or any other comparable experience or background which results in financial sophistication, including being or having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities.
Meetings
The Committee shall meet at least four times per year and, if circumstances dictate, the Committee Chairman may call additional meetings. The Chairman shall distribute an agenda for each meeting to each Committee member at least five business days prior to each meeting. The Committee shall keep minutes of each meeting, and copies of the minutes shall be circulated to each member of the Committee for review and approval.
In order to maintain an open avenue of communication between the Committee and the internal auditors and the independent auditor, the Committee shall meet privately at least semiannually with each of the internal auditor and the independent auditor. In addition, the Committee shall meet quarterly with management and the independent auditor to review the Companys quarterly financial results.
-32-
Responsibilities
The Committee shall perform the following oversight functions:
General Responsibilities
1. | Report periodically to the Board of Directors of the Company about the Committees activities. | |
2. | Review this Charter, at least annually, and recommend changes or updates to the Board. | |
3. | Disclose in the Companys proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders that a formal written charter has been adopted, and whether the Committee satisfied its responsibilities during the prior year in compliance with the charter. | |
4. | Disclose in the Companys annual report to shareholders whether or not, in the prior fiscal year the following has occurred: |
| Management has reviewed the audited financial statements with the Committee, including a discussion of the quality of the accounting principles as applied, including significant judgments affecting the Companys financial statements. | ||
| The independent auditor has discussed with the Committee the independent auditors judgments of the quality of the accounting principles as applied, including managements judgments affecting the Companys financial statements. |
Independent Auditor
The independent auditor is ultimately accountable to the Committee and the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has the ultimate authority and responsibility to select, to evaluate and, if necessary, to replace the independent auditor (or to nominate the outside auditor for approval in any proxy statement). With respect to the independent auditor, the Committee shall perform the following oversight function:
1. | Review the performance of the independent auditor annually and recommend to the Board of Directors the continued retention of the independent auditor or the appointment of a new independent auditor (including the bases for such recommendation). The bases would include the following: |
| The auditors independence determined from an annual report from the independent auditor which delineates all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company in a manner consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard 1. | ||
| Any disclosed relationships or services which may impact the objectivity and independence of the auditor determined from a dialogue with the auditor. | ||
| The fees and other compensation to be paid to the independent auditor. | ||
| Any changes, including personnel changes, the independent auditor makes on the Companys account. |
-33-
| The charges incurred for audit and consulting work performed by independent accountants for the Companys material subsidiaries and affiliates. |
Audit Processes
1. | Review the coordination of internal and independent audit work to assess completeness of coverage, adequate protection provided by internal control procedures and effective use of audit resources. | |
2. | Meet privately with each of the independent auditor and internal auditor at least semiannually to discuss any matters the Committee or the auditor feel should be discussed privately, including the adequacy of internal controls, the accuracy of the Companys financial statements and the quality and appropriateness of the Companys accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting. | |
3. | Maintain direct communications with the independent auditor and the internal auditor. | |
4. | Review with management and the independent auditor the scope of the independent audit and the proposed audit procedures to be utilized and review the completed audit including any deviations from the proposed audit procedures. | |
5. | Discuss with the independent auditor the auditors judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Companys accounting principles, including compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as applied in its financial reporting, including such issues as the clarity of the Companys financial disclosures, the degree of aggressiveness or conservatism of the Companys accounting principles and underlying estimates and other significant decisions made by management in preparing the financial disclosure and reviewed by the independent auditor. | |
6. | Review with management the independent auditors judgments in paragraph 5 above. | |
7. | Review any difficulties and disagreements encountered during the audit process. | |
8. | Review the activities, budget, staffing and qualifications of the internal audit department. | |
9. | Review all proposed internal audit plans and review all internal audit reports including any deviations from the proposed internal audit plan and any written response by management regarding internal audit reports. |
Financial Reporting and Disclosure Processes
1. | With the assistance of the independent auditor and the internal auditor, review the Companys internal and external financial reporting processes. | |
2. | Review the Companys annual financial statements, including any certification, report, opinion or review rendered by the independent auditor. | |
3. | Review with management and the independent auditor the Companys 10-K prior to its filing. | |
4. | Review with management any material financial information to be filed with the SEC. |
-34-
Process Improvement
1. | Maintain open and separate lines of communication through which the independent auditor, the internal auditor and management can report to the Committee regarding the audit, financial reporting and disclosure processes. | |
2. | Consider and approve, if appropriate, major changes to the Companys auditing and accounting principles and practices proposed by the independent auditor, the internal auditor and management. | |
3. | Review the extent to which changes or improvements in financial or accounting policies have been implemented, are being followed and are beneficial. |
Management
1. | Receive from management the following: |
| Timely reviews of the financial statements and other disclosure documents prior to filing with the SEC. | ||
| Information regarding any changes in accounting or financial reporting principles and the accounting treatment of significant transactions. | ||
| Information concerning any second opinion sought by management regarding the accounting treatment of any significant transaction. |
2. | Discuss with management their assessment of significant risks to the Company and what management has done to minimize these risks and disclose them, if necessary. | |
3. | Review and periodically suggest revisions to the Companys Corporate Compliance Policies and Programs. Review quarterly with management the Compliance Coordinators reports regarding compliance with the Companys Corporate Compliance Policies and Programs. | |
4. | Review with management the minutes of the Audit Committees of the subsidiaries and affiliates in which the Company has a significant investment or which contribute significant income to the Company. | |
5. | Review with management the compliance of the Companys subsidiaries and affiliates with laws and regulations promulgated by the countries, states and municipalities in which they are operating. |
Legal Compliance
1. | Review with the Companys legal counsel the Companys compliance with the securities laws and regulations. | |
2. | Review with the Companys legal counsel industry-specific laws and regulations, including those of the Surface Transportation Board and the Federal Railroad Administration. |
-35-
3. | Review with the Companys legal counsel any legal matter which could have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. |
-36-
IMPORTANT
Your revocation of consent is important. Regardless of the number of shares of Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation common stock you own, please vote as recommended by your Board of Directors by taking these two simple steps:
1. | PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY MAIL the enclosed BLUE Consent Revocation Card in the postage-paid envelope provided. | ||
2. | DO NOT RETURN ANY WHITE CONSENT CARD sent to you by the Burkhardt Group, not even as a vote of protest. |
IF YOU PREVIOUSLY SIGNED THE BURKHARDT GROUPS WHITE CONSENT CARD, YOU HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE SIMPLY BY SIGNING, DATING AND MAILING THE ENCLOSED BLUE REVOCATION CARD. THIS WILL REVOKE YOUR EARLIER CONSENT. REMEMBER, ONLY YOUR LAST-DATED CARD WILL COUNT.
Instructions for Street Name Shareholders
If you own shares in the name of a brokerage firm or bank, only your broker or banker can vote your shares on your behalf and only after receiving your specific instructions. Please call your broker or banker and instruct him or her to execute a BLUE revocation card on your behalf. You should promptly sign, date and mail your BLUE card when you receive it from your broker. Please do so for each separate account you maintain.
Please return your BLUE Revocation of Consent Card at once.
If you have any questions or need assistance in revoking your consent, please call:
D.F. King & CO., Inc.
77 Water Street
New York, NY 10005
Call Toll-Free
1-800-769-4414
-37-
WISCONSIN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
REVOCATION OF CONSENT CARD
This Revocation of Consent is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation in opposition to the solicitation by the Burkhardt Group.
Unless otherwise specified below, the undersigned, a holder of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Common Stock), of Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on October 23, 2000 (the Record Date), acting with respect to all of the shares of Common Stock held by the undersigned, hereby revokes any and all consents that the undersigned may have given with respect to each of the proposals listed below:
The Board of Directors of Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation unanimously recommends that you Revoke Consent as to Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Please sign, date and mail this consent revocation card today.
If no direction is made with respect to one or more of the following proposals, or if you mark either the Revoke Consent or Abstain box with respect to one or more of the following proposals, this consent revocation card will revoke all previously executed consents with respect to such proposals.
Burkhardt Proposal 1 - Elimination of Provision Establishing Classified Board
Revoke Consent / / Do Not Revoke Consent / / Abstain / / |
Burkhardt Proposal 2 - Modification of the Provision for Filling Vacancies
Revoke Consent / / Do Not Revoke Consent / / Abstain / / |
Burkhardt Proposal 3 - Elimination of Provision Regarding the Removal of Directors
Revoke Consent / / Do Not Revoke Consent / / Abstain / / |
Burkhardt Proposal 4 - Removal of Current Directors: Thomas E. Evans, Carl Ferenbach, J. Reilly McCarren, Roland V. McPherson, Thomas F. Power, Jr., Thomas W. Rissman, John W. Rowe, A. Francis Small and Robert H. Wheeler.
Revoke Consent / / Do Not Revoke Consent / / Abstain / / |
Instruction: To revoke consent to the removal of certain of the current directors of the Company, but not all of them, check the Revoke Consent box above and write the name of each person as to whom you do not wish to revoke consent in the following space:________________________. |
-38-
Burkhardt Proposal 5 - Election of Nominees: John W. Barriger, Edward A. Burkhardt, Raymond C. Burton, Jr., Robert E. Dowdy, Aaron J. Gellman, Michael W. Howell, Henry Posner III and Andy Sze.
Revoke Consent / / Do Not Revoke Consent / / Abstain / / |
Instruction: If you wish to revoke consent to the election of certain of the Nominees, but not all of them, check the Revoke Consent box above and write the name of each such person as to whom you do not wish to revoke consent in the following space: ________________________________________________________________. | |||
If no box is marked above with respect to this Proposal, the undersigned will be deemed to revoke consent to such Proposal, except that the undersigned will not be deemed to revoke consent to the election of any candidate whose name is written in in the space provided above. |
Burkhardt Proposal 6 - Repeal of Bylaws Adopted Subsequent to May 20, 1999
Revoke Consent / / Do Not Revoke Consent / / Abstain / / |
If no direction is made, this revocation card will be deemed to revoke all previously executed consents with respect to any or all of the proposals set forth herein.
Please sign your name below exactly as it appears hereon. If shares are held jointly, each stockholder should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
Dated:_________________________________
_______________________________ Signature |
_______________________________ Signature if held jointly |
_______________________________ Title(s) |
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please contact D.F. King & Co., Inc., toll-free at 1-800-769-4414
Please sign, date and return this consent revocation promptly.
-39-
|