GLOBAL MOTORSPORT GROUP INC
SC 14D9/A, 1998-11-24
MOTOR VEHICLE SUPPLIES & NEW PARTS
Previous: MERRILL LYNCH TECHNOLOGY FUND INC, N-30D, 1998-11-24
Next: ENGLE HOMES INC /FL, 10-K, 1998-11-24



<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
                            ------------------------
 
                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
 
                                 SCHEDULE 14D-9
 
SOLICITATION/RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 14(D)(4) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                            ------------------------
 
                         GLOBAL MOTORSPORT GROUP, INC.
                           (Name of Subject Company)
 
                         GLOBAL MOTORSPORT GROUP, INC.
                       (Name of Person Filing Statement)
 
                         ------------------------------
 
                    COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
                         (Title of Class of Securities)
 
                         ------------------------------
 
                                   378937106
                     (CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
 
                         ------------------------------
 
                              JAMES J. KELLY, JR.
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         GLOBAL MOTORSPORT GROUP, INC.
                             16100 JACQUELINE COURT
                         MORGAN HILL, CALIFORNIA 95037
                                 (408) 778-0500
      (Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive
   Notices and Communications on Behalf of the Person Filing this Statement)
 
                         ------------------------------
 
                                   COPIES TO:
 
                             THOMAS D. MAGILL, ESQ.
                          GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
                                  4 PARK PLAZA
                                JAMBOREE CENTER
                                IRVINE, CA 92614
                                 (949) 451-3800
 
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
    This Statement amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation
Statement on Schedule 14D-9 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") on November 16, 1998, (the "Schedule 14D-9") relating to the cash
tender offer described in the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule 14D-1, dated
November 16, 1998 (as amended or supplemented, the "Schedule 14D-1"), filed by
Stonington Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), and GMG
Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Parent, with the SEC, relating to an offer to purchase all of the
issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the
"Common Stock"), including the associated rights to purchase shares of Common
Stock issued pursuant to the Rights Agreement between the Company and American
Stock Transfer and Trust Company, dated as of November 13, 1996 (the "Rights"
and, together with the Common Stock, the "Shares"), of the Company at a price of
$19.50 per Share net to the seller in cash, without interest, upon the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in Purchaser's Offer to Purchase, dated
November 16, 1998, and in the related Letter of Transmittal. Capitalized terms
used and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in
the Schedule 14D-9.
 
ITEM 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED.
 
    Item 8 is hereby supplemented as follows:
 
    On November 24, 1998, the Company sent to stockholders the letter attached
hereto as Exhibit 4, and, on that same day, the Company sent to Golden Cycle the
letter attached hereto as Exhibit 5.
 
                                       2
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. MATERIALS TO BE FILED AS EXHIBITS.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
  EXHIBIT
  NUMBER                                                   DESCRIPTION
- -----------  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C>          <S>
         1   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated November 8, 1998, by and among Stonington Acquisition Corp., GMG
             Acquisition Corp. and Global Motorsport Group, Inc., including Conditions to the Offer.+
 
         2   Opinion of Cleary Gull Reiland & McDevitt Inc., dated November 8, 1998.*+
 
         3   Letter to Stockholders of Global Motorsport Group, Inc., dated November 16, 1998.*+
 
         4   Letter to Stockholders of Global Motorsport Group, Inc., dated November 24, 1998.++
 
         5   Letter to Golden Cycle, dated November 24, 1998.++
</TABLE>
 
- ------------------------
 
*   Included in Schedule 14D-9 mailed to stockholders.
 
+   Previously filed.
 
++  Filed herewith.
 
                                       3
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURE
 
    After reasonable inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I
certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and
correct.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>  <C>
                                By:             /s/ JOSEPH F. KEENAN
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                                  Joseph F. Keenan
                                               CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
</TABLE>
 
Dated: November 24, 1998
 
                                       4
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT INDEX
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   EXHIBIT
   NUMBER                                                    DESCRIPTION
- -------------  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C>            <S>
          1    Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated November 8, 1998, by and among Stonington Acquisition Corp., GMG
               Acquisition Corp. and Global Motorsport Group, Inc. , including Conditions to the Offer.+
 
          2    Opinion of Cleary Gull Reiland & McDevitt Inc., dated November 8, 1998.*+
 
          3    Letter to Stockholders of Global Motorsport Group, Inc., dated November 16, 1998.*+
 
          4    Letter to Stockholders of Global Motorsport Group, Inc., dated November 24, 1998.++
 
          5    Letter to Golden Cycle, dated November 24, 1998.++
</TABLE>
 
- ------------------------
 
*   Included in Schedule 14D-9 mailed to stockholders.
 
+   Previously filed.
 
++  Filed herewith.
 
                                       5

<PAGE>
                                     [LOGO]
 
                                                               November 24, 1998
 
Dear Stockholder:
 
    The Board of Directors of the Company has considered the proposal outlined
in the November 18, 1998 letter from Golden Cycle relating to its previously
announced proposal to engage in a transaction in which the Company would tender
for 99% of its outstanding shares not owned by Golden Cycle at a per share price
of $20.00.
 
    After consultation with and receipt of advice from Cleary Gull Reiland &
McDevitt, its financial advisor, and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, its legal
advisor, and after taking into account the Company's obligations under its
merger agreement with an affiliate of Stonington Partners, Inc., the Board has
determined to reject the Golden Cycle proposal and not to pursue discussions
with, or provide information to, Golden Cycle. Your Board also has unanimously
reaffirmed its recommendation of the pending Stonington offer.
 
    In its deliberations the Board considered the following:
 
    - Cleary Gull advised the Board that the cash value per share of the Golden
      Cycle proposal is less than $20.00 as it is not for all of the outstanding
      shares. Cleary Gull also advised the Board that it was not possible based
      upon the information provided to value the stub component of the Golden
      Cycle proposal. Cleary Gull further advised the Board that it was
      reasonable to further discount the value of the Golden Cycle proposal to
      take into account the time value of money between the December 14, 1998
      scheduled closing of the pending Stonington tender offer and the uncertain
      consummation of the Golden Cycle proposal, which could be significantly
      later than December 14th. Cleary Gull advised the Board that the impact of
      all of the foregoing could be to significantly diminish the purported
      value of the Golden Cycle proposal, especially in relation to the pending
      all cash Stonington tender offer that is expected to close on December
      14th.
 
    - The Board noted that although the Grass family had "agreed" to provide a
      significant portion of the financing required under the Golden Cycle
      proposal, it had not been provided with any evidence that such financing
      is readily available. In contrast, the Board observed that the Stonington
      Fund was formed with over $1 billion in committed capital, and the Board
      was satisfied that Stonington had on call the funds necessary to provide
      the $80 million equity contribution to the transaction.
 
    - The Board considered the fact that Stonington had completed extensive due
      diligence prior to execution of the merger agreement. In contrast, the
      Board was troubled by the fact that Golden Cycle did not avail itself of
      the Company's offer for Golden Cycle to conduct due diligence even after
      the Board had dropped the precondition, which applied to Stonington and
      every other potential bidder, that
<PAGE>
      Golden Cycle enter into a customary standstill agreement. The Company's
      offer was made to Golden Cycle on October 5 and again on October 29.
      Golden Cycle never responded. The Board believes that Golden Cycle's
      failure to perform due diligence when it had the opportunity to do so
      creates substantial doubt regarding the credibility of the Golden Cycle
      proposal. In addition, the Board noted that Stonington had refused to
      waive the applicable provisions of the Stonington merger agreement, which
      provisions prohibit the sharing of confidential information unless, among
      other things, the third party enters into a confidentiality agreement on
      terms no less favorable to the Company than those included in the
      confidentiality agreement entered into with Stonington. The Board noted
      that Golden Cycle had at least thirty days prior to the execution of the
      Stonington merger agreement during which it could have obtained access to
      due diligence.
 
    - The Board was advised that, although not noted in the Golden Cycle consent
      solicitation materials or in any of its related press releases, Golden
      Cycle had stated in its court pleadings that its proposal was conditioned
      upon invalidation of the termination fee provisions of the Stonington
      merger agreement. The Board believes these provisions, which were
      bargained for and insisted upon by Stonington, are legal and customary
      both in nature and in amount. Thus, Golden Cycle's court pleadings create
      at best an ambiguity with respect to the Golden Cycle proposal and, in the
      Board's view, a condition that will not be satisfied.
 
    - The Board of Directors of the Company believes that the likelihood of
      successfully and promptly completing the Stonington transaction is
      materially higher than the likelihood of successfully and promptly
      completing a transaction with an uncertain value with Golden Cycle. The
      Stonington offer is not coercive: it is for all shares at the same $19.50
      cash price; it has fully committed financing; and the Company's
      stockholders are free to choose whether or not to tender their shares.
      Moreover, the Board believes that the terms of the agreement with
      Stonington do not materially deter BONA FIDE acquisition proposals from
      third parties nor do they impair the Board's ability to exercise its
      fiduciary duties in response to any such proposals.
 
    For the reasons discussed above, the Board unanimously resolved to reject
the Golden Cycle proposal and reaffirm its recommendation of the pending offer
by Stonington and communicated this response to Golden Cycle by letter.
 
                                           Very truly yours,
 
                                           /s/ Joseph F. Keenan
                                           Joseph F. Keenan
                                           CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

<PAGE>
                                     [LOGO]
 
                                                               November 24, 1998
 
Mr. Roger Grass
Golden Cycle, LLC
One Wynnewood Road, Suite 100
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096
 
Dear Mr. Grass:
 
    The Board of Directors of the Company has considered your proposal as
outlined in your letter dated November 18, 1998 and, for the reasons discussed
in the attached letter to stockholders, has determined to reject it and reaffirm
our recommendation of the pending offer by an affiliate of Stonington Partners,
Inc.
 
    Any further information you care to provide which addresses our concerns
will of course be considered by the Board in good faith and consistent with the
Board's fiduciary duties and contractual obligations.
 
                                           Very truly yours,
 
                                           /s/ Joseph F. Keenan
                                           Joseph F. Keenan
                                           CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission