MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL INC/DE
10-Q, 1996-05-08
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
Previous: DEFINED ASSET FUNDS MUNICIPAL INVT TR FD MULTISTATE SER 9W, 485BPOS, 1996-05-08
Next: NORTH AMERICAN MORTGAGE CO, SC 13D, 1996-05-08





                                  UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 10-Q


(X)      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1996

                                       OR

( )      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Commission File number:    0-19750
                       ----------------

                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



          Delaware                                         94-2957068
 (State or other jurisdiction of                       (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                        Identification No.)


34700 Campus Drive, Fremont, California                       94555
(Address of principal executive offices)                   (Zip  Code)



       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (510) 742-9900




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.


                                  Yes    X     No
                                     --------     -------


Number of shares of Common Stock,  $.01 par value,  outstanding  as of March 31,
1996: 17,896,742.


                                                                          Page 1

<PAGE>

                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.


                                      INDEX





    PART I.                    FINANCIAL INFORMATION                    Page No.


Item 1.  Financial   Statements


         Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31, 1996
         and December 31, 1995                                             3

         Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
         Three Months Ended March 31, 1996 and 1995                        4

         Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
         Three Months Ended March 31, 1996 and 1995                        5

         Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements              6


Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
         Condition and Results of Operations                               8


    PART II.                   OTHER INFORMATION


         Risk Factors                                                     10

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                 19

         Signatures                                                       20




                                                                          Page 2

<PAGE>


                          MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
                         (a development stage company)

                     Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets




                                                            (In thousands)

                                                       March 31,    December 31,
                                                         1996          1995
                                                      ---------     ---------
Assets                                               (Unaudited)

Current assets:
 Cash and cash equivalents                            $  33,656     $  55,675
 Short-term investments                                  24,111         9,646
 Other current assets                                       834           952
                                                      ---------     ---------
  Total current assets                                   58,601        66,273

Property and equipment, net                              16,355        15,919
Non-current investments                                  11,792        12,010
Deposits and other assets, net                              182           217
                                                      ---------     ---------
                                                      $  86,930     $  94,419
                                                      =========     =========

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Current liabilities:
 Accounts payable                                     $   1,349     $   1,605
 Accrued liabilities                                      2,852         3,322
 Current portion of debt and capital
  lease obligations                                         789           830
                                                      ---------     ---------
  Total current liabilities                               4,990         5,757

Debt and capital lease obligations, less 
  current portion                                        12,214        12,307
Stockholders' equity
 Capital stock                                          153,050       152,601
 Deficit accumulated during the development stage       (83,324)      (76,246)
                                                      ---------     ---------
  Total stockholders' equity                             69,726        76,355
                                                      ---------     ---------
                                                      $  86,930     $  94,419
                                                      =========     =========



                                                                         
                             See Accompanying Notes                       Page 3
<PAGE>

                          MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
                         (a development stage company)

                Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

                    (In thousands except per share amounts)




                                             Three Months Ended
                                                  March 31,
                                            1996             1995
                                        -----------       ---------
                                        (Unaudited)      (Unaudited)

Revenues                                $    --           $      --         

Costs and expenses:
 Research and development                  5,700               4,432
 General and administrative                2,128               1,275
                                        --------           ---------
  Total costs and expenses                 7,828               5,707
                                        --------           ---------

Loss from operations                      (7,828)             (5,707)

Interest and other income, net               750                 423
                                        --------           ---------

Net loss                                $ (7,078)          $  (5,284)     
                                        ========           =========

Net loss per share                      $  (0.42)          $   (0.49)
                                        ========           =========

Weighted average number
of shares outstanding                     16,941              10,761
                                        ========           =========

                                                                          
                             See Accompanying Notes                       Page 4


<PAGE>

                          MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
                         (a development stage company)

                 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

                                 (In thousands)

                                                           For the three months
                                                               Ended March 31  
                                                             1996        1995  
                                                         ----------  -----------
                                                         (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
   Net loss                                                $ (7,078)   $ (5,284)
   Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
    net cash used by operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization                               257         223
    Amortization of deferred compensation                        42          50
    Other                                                         1          40
   Changes in assets and liabilities:
    Other current assets                                        118         (81)
    Deposits and other assets                                    35           4
    Accounts payable                                           (256)       (216)
    Other accrued liabilities                                  (470)        198
                                                           --------     -------
     Net cash used by operating activities                   (7,351)     (5,066)
Cash flows from investing activities:
   Capital expenditures                                        (693)       (210)
   Investment in securities available-for-sale              (20,658)       (184)
   Proceeds of securities-available-for-sale                    268         501
   Maturities of investments                                  6,221       1,167
                                                           --------     -------
    Cash flows provided (used) by investing activities      (14,862)      1,274
Cash flows from financing activities:
   Payments on debt and capital lease obligations              (134)        (97)
   Net cash proceeds from issuance of:
    Debt and capital lease financing                           --           208
    Capital stock                                               328         (16)
                                                           --------     --------
    Cash flows provided by financing activities                 194          95
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                   (22,019)     (3,697)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period         55,675      10,276
                                                           --------     -------
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period             $ 33,656     $ 6,579
                                                           ========     =======

                                                                          
                             See Accompanying Notes                       Page 5


<PAGE>
                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.


              NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 March 31, 1996




1.       Basis of presentation

                  The results of  operations  for the interim  periods  shown in
         this report are not  necessarily  indicative  of results to be expected
         for the year ending  December 31, 1996.  In the opinion of  management,
         the information  contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary to
         make the results of operations for the interim periods a fair statement
         of such  operations.  All such  adjustments  are of a normal  recurring
         nature.

                  These condensed  consolidated  financial  statements should be
         read in conjunction with the Company's audited  consolidated  financial
         statements for the year ended December 31, 1995,  which were filed with
         the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K.

2.       Principles of consolidation

                  The consolidated  financial statements include the accounts of
         the Company and its wholly owned  subsidiary  after  elimination of all
         material intercompany balances and transactions.

3.       Net loss per share

                  Net loss per  share is  computed  using the  weighted  average
         number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Common
         stock  equivalents  consisting of stock options,  convertible  Series A
         preferred  shares and  warrants are excluded  from the  computation  as
         their impact is anti-dilutive.

4.       Cash and cash  equivalents,  short-term  investments,  and  non-current
         investments

                  The  Company   invests  its  excess  cash  in  government  and
         corporate  securities.  Highly liquid  investments  with  maturities of
         three months or less at the date of  acquisition  are considered by the
         Company to be cash  equivalents.  Investments  with  maturities  beyond
         three months at the date of acquisition and that mature within one year
         from  the  balance   sheet  date  are   considered   to  be  short-term
         investments.  Investments with maturities longer than one year from the
         balance  sheet  date  are  classified  as  short-term   investments  or
         non-current investments based on the Company's intended holding period.

                  The  Company   maintains  its  cash,   cash   equivalents  and
         investments in several different  instruments held by various banks and
         brokerage houses.  This  diversification of risk is consistent with the
         Company's  policy  to  maintain  liquidity  and  ensure  the  safety of
         principal.


                                                                          Page 6
<PAGE>


                  The Company determines the appropriate  classification of debt
         securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates  such designation as
         of each balance sheet date.  The amortized  cost of debt  securities is
         adjusted for  amortization  of premiums  and  accretion of discounts to
         maturity.  Such  amortization is included in interest and other income.
         Realized   gains  and  losses  and  declines  in  value  judged  to  be
         other-than-temporary  are also  included in interest and other  income.
         The cost of  securities  sold is based on the  specific  identification
         method.  Debt  securities are classified as  held-to-maturity  when the
         Company has the positive  intent and ability to hold the  securities to
         maturity and are carried at amortized cost.

                  Debt securities  which are not classified as  held-to-maturity
         and which are not held for resale in anticipation of short-term  market
         movements  are  classified  as  available-for-sale.  Available-for-sale
         securities  are carried at fair value,  with the  unrealized  gains and
         losses,  net of tax, reported in a separate  component of stockholders'
         equity.

5.       Subsequent event

                  On  April  8,  1996,  the  Company  completed  the  sale  of a
         3,162,500 share public offering of the Company's Common Stock at $22.63
         per share  which  resulted  in net  proceeds  of $67.4  million  to the
         Company.   See  Management's   Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial
         Condition and Results of Operations for further  information related to
         liquidity and capital resources.



                                                                          Page 7

<PAGE>
                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.


                     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
                  FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


       This report  contains  certain  statements  of a  forward-looking  nature
relating  to future  events  or the  future  performance  of the  Company.  Such
statements  are only  predictions  and the actual  events or results  may differ
materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors
that could cause or contribute to such  differences  include those  discussed in
"Risk  Factors" in the 1995 Form 10-K as well as those  discussed  elsewhere  in
this report.


Results of Operations

         Three Months Ended March 31, 1996 and 1995

         Since  the  Company's  inception  in  1985,  the  primary  focus of its
operations  has been research and  development,  and to date it has not received
any revenues from the commercial sale of products.  The Company anticipates that
it will not  recognize  any  revenues  from  commercial  sales until  regulatory
approvals  are  obtained.  The  Company  has a history of  operating  losses and
expects to incur substantial additional losses over the next several years as it
continues  to develop  its  products.  For the period  from  February  11,  1985
(inception)  to March 31, 1996 the Company has incurred a cumulative net loss of
$83,324,000.

         The Company had no revenue in either of the first  quarters of 1996 and
1995.

         Research  and  development  expenses  for  the  first  quarter  of 1996
increased by 29% to $5,700,000  versus $4,432,000 for the first quarter of 1995.
This  increase was due to higher  clinical  costs to support  basal cell cancer,
head and neck  cancer and other  accessible  tumors,  higher  personnel  related
expenses,  and higher  production costs in preparation for the commercial launch
of AccuSiteTM for the treatment of genital warts.

         General and administrative  expenses increased by 67% to $2,128,000 for
the first quarter of 1996 versus  $1,275,000 for the first quarter of 1995. This
increase was due to higher personnel related  expenses,  including new marketing
staff,  and  increased  legal  expenses  related  to  the  Collagen  Corporation
litigation.

         Net  interest  and other  income  increased  to $750,000  for the first
quarter of 1996 versus  $423,000 for the first quarter of 1995. The increase was
primarily the result of higher average  balances in cash,  cash  equivalents and
marketable  securities  in 1996.  This was partially  offset by higher  interest
expense  associated  with the mortgage on the Company's San Diego  manufacturing
facility, which was purchased in the fourth quarter of 1995.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

         At March  31,  1996,  the  Company  had  $69.6  million  in cash,  cash
equivalents and marketable  securities compared to $77.3 million at December 31,
1995.

         On April 8, 1996, the Company  completed the sale of a 3,162,500  share
public offering of the Company's common stock at $22.63 per share which resulted
in net proceeds of $67.4 million to the Company.

         During the first  quarter  of 1996,  13,334  outstanding  shares of the
Company's  Series A preferred stock were converted into 1,333,400  shares of the
Company's common stock.


                                                                          Page 8
<PAGE>

         The Company has financed its operations and capital asset  acquisitions
from its  inception  through the sale of equity  securities,  contract  research
revenues,  license fees,  interest income, and capital lease and debt financing.
The Company expects to finance its continued operating requirements  principally
with cash on hand as well with additional  capital  generated through equity and
debt financings and collaborative agreements.

         The Company's  working capital and capital  requirements will depend on
numerous  factors,   including  the  progress  of  the  Company's  research  and
development  programs,  preclinical  testing and clinical trial activities,  the
timing and cost of obtaining regulatory approvals,  the levels of resources that
the  Company  devotes  to  the  development  of   manufacturing   and  marketing
capabilities, technological advances and the status of competitors.

         The Company expects to incur  substantial  additional costs relating to
the  continued  clinical  development  of its products,  continued  research and
development   programs,   the   development   of  marketing  and   manufacturing
capabilities,  the purchase of additional  capital equipment and general working
capital  requirements.  The Company  anticipates that its existing and committed
capital  resources,  including the proceeds of the public offering  completed in
April  1996,  will enable it to  maintain  its  current  and planned  operations
through 1998. The Company may require  additional  outside financing to complete
the process of bringing current products to market, and while the Company is not
aware of any limitations on future sources of capital, there can be no assurance
that such financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all.

         Capital  expenditures  for  environmental   control  efforts  were  not
material during the first three months of 1996 and 1995.


                                                                          Page 9
<PAGE>

                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.

                                  RISK FACTORS

No Assurance of Regulatory Approvals

         The preclinical and clinical testing,  manufacturing,  and marketing of
the  Company's  products  are  subject  to  extensive   regulation  by  numerous
governmental  authorities in the United States and other  countries,  including,
but not  limited  to, the FDA.  Among other  requirements,  FDA  approval of the
Company's  products,  including  a review  of the  manufacturing  processes  and
facilities used to produce such products,  will be required before such products
may be marketed in the United States. Similarly, marketing approval by a foreign
governmental  authority  is  typically  required  before  such  products  may be
marketed in a particular foreign country. Matrix has no products approved by the
FDA or  any  foreign  authority  and  does  not  expect  to  achieve  profitable
operations  unless  product  candidates  now under  development  receive  FDA or
foreign regulatory approval and are thereafter commercialized successfully.

         In  order to  obtain  FDA  approval  of a  product,  the  Company  must
demonstrate  to the  satisfaction  of the FDA  that  such  product  is safe  and
effective for its intended uses and that the Company is capable of manufacturing
the product with procedures that conform to the FDA's current good manufacturing
practice ("GMP")  regulations,  which must be followed at all times. The Company
has  had  only  limited   experience  in  submitting  and  pursuing   regulatory
applications.  The  process of  obtaining  FDA  approvals  can be  costly,  time
consuming,  and subject to unanticipated  delays. There can be no assurance that
such approvals will be granted to the Company on a timely basis, or at all.

         The process of obtaining FDA regulatory  approval  involves a number of
steps that, taken together,  may involve seven years or more from the initiation
of clinical trials and require the expenditure of substantial  resources.  Among
other  requirements,  this process  requires that the product undergo  extensive
preclinical and clinical testing and that the Company file an NDA requesting FDA
approval.  When a product  contains more than one component that  contributes to
the product's effect, as do all of the Company's current product candidates, the
FDA may request that  additional  data be submitted in order to demonstrate  the
contribution  of each such  component to clinical  efficacy.  In addition,  when
there has been a  manufacturing  change in a product  component  (either  in the
process  by  which  the  component  is  manufactured  or the site at which it is
manufactured) during product  development,  as is the case with the collagen gel
used in the Company's AccuSite product, the FDA may request that additional data
be submitted to demonstrate that the  manufacturing  change has not affected the
clinical performance of the product. In addition,  the manufacturing  facilities
for the product must be inspected and accepted by the FDA as being in compliance
with GMP regulations prior to approval of the product. There can be no assurance
that the  Company's  manufacturing  facilities  in San Jose and Milpitas will be
accepted  by the FDA,  and  failure  to  achieve  such  acceptance  would have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business.

         Matrix has used three different sources of collagen gel in the products
on which it has conducted clinical trials:  Koken Co., Ltd. ("Koken"),  Collagen
Corporation  ("Collagen")  and its own  production.  The Company  intends to use
collagen gel of its own  manufacture in products it markets  commercially if FDA
approval is received.  Accordingly,  the Company has not  referenced  Collagen's
Pre-Market Approval files in its NDA. (See "-- Litigation" )


                                                                         Page 10
<PAGE>


         However, as noted above, when there has been a manufacturing  change in
a product, such as a change in the supplier of a component,  the FDA may request
that additional data be submitted to demonstrate that the  manufacturing  change
has not  affected the  clinical  performance  of the product as shown in earlier
clinical  trials.  Accordingly,  Matrix has  conducted  a series of  preclinical
studies to show  comparability of products made from Collagen,  Koken and Matrix
collagen gel, a bioequivalency study to show comparability of products made with
Matrix  and  Collagen  collagen  gel  and  Phase  III  clinical  trials  to show
comparability in clinical  performance of a product made with Koken collagen gel
and a product made with  Collagen  collagen  gel.  The Company also  conducted a
Phase III(b) clinical trial to demonstrate the comparable  clinical  performance
of a product  made with  Matrix  collagen  gel to a product  made with  Collagen
collagen  gel.  The Company  believes  that all studies  conducted  to date have
supported the comparable clinical performance of products made with collagen gel
from all three  sources,  but there can be no assurance that the FDA will agree.
In  addition,  there can be no assurance  that the FDA will not require  further
clinical  demonstrations  either of the  comparability  of a  product  made with
Matrix collagen gel to product made with Collagen collagen gel or Koken collagen
gel, or the safety and efficiency of a product made with Matrix collagen gel. If
questions arise during the FDA review process about  comparability  or about the
safety and efficacy of a product made with collagen, it could delay the approval
process or prevent approval.

         The Company's analysis of the results of its clinical studies submitted
as part of an NDA is subject to review and  interpretation by the FDA, which may
differ from the Company's analysis. There can be no assurance that the Company's
data or its  interpretation  of data will be accepted  by the FDA. In  addition,
delays or rejections may be encountered  based upon changes in applicable law or
FDA policy during the period of product  development and FDA regulatory  review.
Any failure to obtain,  or delay in  obtaining,  FDA approvals  would  adversely
affect the ability of the  Company to market its  proposed  products.  Moreover,
even  if  FDA  approval  is  granted,  such  approval  may  include  significant
limitations on indicated uses for which a product could be marketed.

         Both  before  and  after   approval  is   obtained,   a  product,   its
manufacturer,  and  the  holder  of the  NDA  for the  product  are  subject  to
comprehensive regulatory oversight. Violations of regulatory requirements at any
stage,  including the preclinical  and clinical  testing  process,  the approval
process  or  thereafter  (including  after  approval),  may  result  in  adverse
consequences,  including  the FDA's delay in  approving  or refusal to approve a
product,  withdrawal  of  an  approved  product  from  the  market,  and/or  the
imposition of criminal penalties against the manufacturer and/or the NDA holder.
In  addition,  later  discovery of  previously  unknown  problems  relating to a
marketed  product may result in restrictions on such product,  manufacturer,  or
the NDA holder,  including  withdrawal of the product from the market. Also, new
government   requirements  may  be  established  that  could  delay  or  prevent
regulatory   approval  of  the  Company's   products  under   development.   See
"--Uncertainty   of   Pharmaceutical   Pricing;   No   Assurance   of   Adequate
Reimbursement."

         The processes  required by European  regulatory  authorities before the
Company's products can be marketed in Western Europe are similar to those in the
United States.  First,  appropriate  preclinical  laboratory and animal tests as
well as analytical product quality tests must be done, followed by submission of
a  clinical  trial  exemption  ("CTX")  or similar  documentation  before  human
clinical  trials  can  be  initiated.  Upon  completion  of  adequate  and  well
controlled  clinical  trials in humans that  establish that the drug is safe and
efficacious,  regulatory  approval of an MAA must be obtained  from the relevant
regulatory  authorities.  The Company  filed its MAA for  AccuSite in the United
Kingdom in August 1995 under the mutual  recognition  process of a product.  The
Company subsequently filed an MAA in Germany,  France, Italy and Sweden. As with
the United States FDA review process,  there are numerous risks  associated with
the MAA  review.  Additional  data may be  requested  by the  regulatory  agency
reviewing the MAA to demonstrate the contribution 


                                                                         Page 11
<PAGE>

of a product  component to the clinical safety and efficacy of a product,  or to
confirm  the  comparable   performance  of  materials   produced  by  a  changed
manufacturing process or at a changed manufacturing site.

         In February  1996,  the Company was notified by the  Medicines  Control
Agency in the United  Kingdom  that the  Committee  on Safety of  Medicines  had
recommended  that a product license be granted for AccuSite for the treatment of
genital warts, subject to the Company's response to certain questions. While the
Company has filed a response to those questions,  there can be no assurance that
the  Company's  response  will  adequately  address  such  questions or that the
Company will ultimately  receive such a product license,  or that such approvals
will be granted in a timely  fashion,  or at all. In  addition,  there can be no
assurance of mutual  recognition by other  participating  states of any approval
obtained in the United Kingdom, if such approval is obtained.

Uncertainties Associated with Clinical Trials

         Matrix has conducted  and plans to continue to undertake  extensive and
costly  clinical  testing to assess the safety  and  efficacy  of its  potential
products.  Failure to comply with FDA regulations applicable to such testing can
result in delay, suspension,  or cancellation of such testing, and/or refusal by
the FDA to accept the results of such testing. In addition,  the FDA may suspend
clinical  trials  at any time if it  concludes  that the  subjects  or  patients
participating  in such trials are being  exposed to  unacceptable  health risks.
Further,  there can be no assurance  that human  clinical  testing will show any
current  or  future  product  candidate  to be safe and  effective  or that data
derived therefrom will be suitable for submission to the FDA.

         The Company is currently  conducting  multiple  clinical  trials in the
United  States and certain  foreign  countries,  including two ongoing Phase III
trials.  The rate of completion of the  Company's  clinical  trials is dependent
upon, among other factors, the rate of patient enrollment. Patient enrollment is
a function of many factors,  including the size of the patient  population,  the
nature of the  protocol,  the  proximity  of patients to clinical  sites and the
eligibility  criteria for the study.  Delays in planned  patient  enrollment may
result in increased costs and delays, which could have a material adverse effect
on the Company.  Generally similar considerations apply to clinical testing that
is  subject  to  regulatory  oversight  by foreign  authorities  and/or  that is
intended to be used in connection with foreign marketing applications.

History of Losses; Future Profitability Uncertain

         Matrix was incorporated in 1985 and has experienced  significant losses
since that date.  As of March 31, 1996,  the Company's  accumulated  deficit was
approximately  $83.3  million.  The Company has not generated  revenues from its
products  and  expects  to incur  significant  additional  losses  over the next
several years. The Company's ability to achieve a profitable level of operations
is  dependent  in large  part on  successfully  developing  products,  obtaining
regulatory  approvals  for  its  products,  and  making  the  transition  to  an
organization  producing  commercial  products or entering  into  agreements  for
product commercialization.  No assurance can be given that the Company's product
development efforts will be completed,  that required regulatory  approvals will
be obtained,  that any products will be manufactured and marketed  successfully,
or that profitability will be achieved.

Additional Financing Requirements and Uncertain Access to Capital Markets

         The Company has expended and will continue to expend  substantial funds
to complete the  research and  development  of and to market its  products.  The
Company will require  additional  funds for these  purposes  through  additional
equity or debt financings, collaborative arrangements with corporate partners or
from other sources. No assurance can be given that such additional funds will be
available on acceptable  terms,  if at all. If adequate  funds are not available
from 


                                                                         Page 12
<PAGE>

operations or additional  sources of financing,  the Company's business could be
materially  and adversely  affected.  Based on its current  operating  plan, the
Company  anticipates  that its existing  capital  resources  will be adequate to
satisfy its  capital  needs  through  1998.  See  "Management's  Discussion  and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Limited Sales and Marketing Experience

         The  Company  intends to market and sell  certain of its  products,  if
successfully developed and approved,  through a direct sales force in the United
States and through  sales and  marketing  partnership  arrangements  outside the
United States.  The Company currently has limited marketing and sales staff, and
has yet to establish any co-promotion or distribution arrangements.  The Company
is developing a sales and marketing  plan for AccuSite and its other products in
clinical development. In order to market its products directly, the Company must
develop a sales force with technical  expertise.  There can be no assurance that
the Company will be able to establish a successful direct sales  organization or
co-promotion  or  distribution  arrangements.  In  addition,  there  can  be  no
assurance  that there will be sufficient  sales of AccuSite or other products to
fund related  expenses,  many of which must be incurred  before sales  commence.
Failure to establish a sales  capability in the United States and/or outside the
United States may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Limited Manufacturing Experience

         The Company's  ability to conduct clinical trials on a timely basis, to
obtain  regulatory  approvals and to  commercialize  its products will depend in
part upon its ability to manufacture  its products,  either  directly or through
third parties,  at a competitive  cost and in accordance with applicable FDA and
other  regulatory  requirements,  including  GMP  regulations.  The  Company  is
currently  manufacturing  AccuSite and IntraDose for its clinical  trials at its
manufacturing  facilities  in San  Jose  and  Milpitas,  California,  as well as
contract manufacturing  facilities.  The Company anticipates that its facilities
in San Jose and Milpitas should provide sufficient  production  capacity to meet
clinical and early commercial  requirements of its AccuSite product and selected
components  for  IntraDose  products  through  1997.  However,  there  can be no
assurance  that the Company will be able to produce  adequate  quantities of its
products  for its  clinical  trials  in a  cost-effective  manner  or  that  the
Company's current manufacturing facilities will be accepted by the FDA.

         In December  1995, the Company  purchased a research and  manufacturing
facility in San Diego,  California.  The Company intends to use this facility to
meet its  long-term  commercial  scale  production  requirements.  This facility
requires   validation  and  process   installation  that  will  require  capital
expenditures  of  approximately  $5  million.  The Company  estimates  that this
facility  will not be  available  for  production  until  1998.  There can be no
assurance  that the Company will be able to validate and scale up this  facility
in a timely manner or that this facility will be adequate for Matrix's long-term
needs  without  delay to the Company's  ability to meet product  demand.  Matrix
expects to continue to use selected contract  manufacturers,  in addition to its
own manufacturing capability, for some or all of its product components. Failure
to  establish  additional  manufacturing  capacity on a timely  basis may have a
material adverse effect on the Company.

Dependence on Sources of Supply

         Several of the materials  used in the Company's  products are available
from a limited  number of  suppliers.  These items,  including  collagen gel and
drugs, have generally been available to Matrix and others in the  pharmaceutical
industry  on  commercially  reasonable  terms.  If the  Company's  manufacturing
facilities  are not able to produce  sufficient  quantities  of collagen  gel in
accordance  with  applicable  regulations,  the  Company  would  have to  obtain
collagen gel from another source and gain  regulatory  approval for that source.
There  can be no  assurance  that  the  Company  would  be  able  to  locate  an
alternative,  cost-effective  source of  supply  of  collagen  gel.  


                                                                         Page 13
<PAGE>


Matrix has negotiated and intends to continue to negotiate supply agreements, as
appropriate,  for the  components  of raw  materials  utilized in its  products.
Matrix is also in the process of  attempting  to approve  second  sources for as
many as possible of these  supplies.  Any  interruption  of supply  could have a
material  adverse effect on the Company's  ability to manufacture  its products,
and thus the  ability  to  complete  the  clinical  trials  or to  commercialize
products.  In addition,  Cisplatin,  a  chemotherapeutic  drug being used by the
Company in its current  clinical trials,  is available for research  purposes in
the  United  States  and  for all  purposes  in  Western  Europe.  Prior  to the
expiration  of the  patent in the United  States in 1996,  the  Company  may not
commercialize  products  incorporating  cisplatin in the United States without a
license. The Company's process for manufacturing collagen gel is currently being
challenged in litigation with Collagen. See "--Litigation."

Litigation

         On December 21, 1994,  Collagen filed a lawsuit  against the Company in
Santa Clara County  Superior  Court alleging  misappropriation  of trade secrets
concerning the manufacturing process for collagen,  including breach of contract
and fraud.  The  Complaint  seeks  unspecified  damages  and  injunctive  relief
directed to Matrix's  manufacture of collagen,  its  regulatory  filings and its
hiring of current or former  Collagen  employees.  On  February  14,  1995,  the
Company  filed  its  answer  to  Collagen's  complaint,  denying  all  claims of
misappropriation, asserting several affirmative defenses and seeking recovery of
its attorneys' fees.  Matrix has also filed a  cross-complaint  against Collagen
and Howard  Palefsky,  Collagen's Chief Executive  Officer,  seeking recovery of
damages for defamation,  violations of California antitrust law and other causes
of action. The parties are currently  conducting discovery and no trial date has
been set with  respect  to any of the  claims  asserted  by  Collagen  or by the
Company.

         On September 12, 1995, Collagen filed a First Amended Complaint, adding
as  defendants  two  former  Collagen  employees  currently  working  at Matrix,
alleging  that these  employees  used  confidential  documents  and  information
acquired  by  them as  Collagen  employees  for the  benefit  of  Matrix.  These
employees had been accused of wrong-doing in the original  Complaint  along with
other former Collagen employees, but not named as defendants.  The First Amended
Complaint purports to add causes of action for conversion against Matrix and the
two  individual  defendants,  and for breach of contract,  breach of confidence,
breach of  fiduciary  obligation  and breach of the duty of loyalty  against the
former Collagen employees.  Matrix is alleged to have induced such breaches. The
First Amended  Complaint adds to the requested relief of the original  Complaint
for damages and injunctive relief a request for the imposition of a constructive
trust on the alleged fruits of the alleged trade secret misappropriation.

         The lawsuit follows a series of contract  negotiations in 1994 aimed at
developing a long-term supply relationship between Collagen and Matrix. Although
processes to  manufacture  collagen gel have been in the public  domain for many
years,  Collagen is presently the only commercial source for collagen gel in the
United States.  Prior to developing its own manufacturing  process,  Matrix used
collagen  gel from two  additional  sources in its  clinical  trials,  including
collagen  gel  manufactured  by Koken and by  Collagen.  See "-- No Assurance of
Regulatory Approvals."

         The  Company  believes  that  the  manufacturing  process  which it has
developed for collagen gel does not  incorporate  any Collagen trade secrets and
that the  lawsuit  filed by  Collagen  is without  merit.  Although  the Company
intends to defend  against  this suit  vigorously,  no  assurances  can be given
regarding its eventual  outcome.  This litigation does not involve any claims of
patent infringement. A finding of misappropriation of trade secrets could result
in  damages  and/or  a  significant  restriction  on the  Company's  ability  to
manufacture its products. Such a finding would also require the Company to alter
its  manufacturing  process,  or seek an alternate source of collagen gel. There
can be no assurance  that the Company  would be able to alter its  manufacturing
process, 


                                                                         Page 14
<PAGE>


if required, in a timely manner, or at all or that it would be able to secure an
alternative  source of  collagen  gel on  commercially  reasonable  terms.  As a
result, there can be no assurance that this lawsuit will not delay the Company's
product  approvals or affect its ability to  manufacture  its products,  each of
which would have a material  adverse  effect on the Company,  its  prospects and
financial  condition.   Additionally,  the  costs  of  litigating  this  matter,
regardless of outcome, may exceed $1,000,000 in 1996.

Uncertainty Regarding Patents and Proprietary Rights

         The Company's  success  depends in part on its ability to obtain patent
protection  for its  products  and to  preserve  its trade  secrets  and operate
without infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties.  No assurance can
be given that the Company's pending patent applications will be approved or that
any patents will provide  competitive  advantages for the Company's  products or
will not be  successfully  challenged or circumvented  by its  competitors.  The
Company has not  conducted an  exhaustive  patent search and no assurance can be
given  that  patents  do not exist or could  not be filed  which  would  have an
adverse  effect on the Company's  ability to market its products or maintain its
competitive position with respect to its products. The Company's patents may not
prevent others from developing  competitive  products using related  technology.
Other companies  obtaining  patents claiming products or processes useful to the
Company may bring  infringement  actions against the Company.  As a result,  the
Company may be required to obtain  licenses from others to develop,  manufacture
or market its products.  There can be no assurance that the Company will be able
to obtain any such licenses on  commercially  reasonable  terms,  if at all. The
Company also relies on trade secrets and proprietary  know-how which it seeks to
protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with its employees, consultants,
suppliers and licensees.  There can be no assurance that these  agreements  will
not be breached,  that the Company would have adequate  remedies for any breach,
or that the  Company's  trade  secrets  will not  otherwise  become  known or be
independently developed by competitors.

         No  assurance  can be given that any patent  issued to, or licensed by,
the Company will provide  protection that has commercial  significance.  In this
regard,  the patent  position of  pharmaceutical  compounds and  compositions is
particularly uncertain.  Even issued patents may later be modified or revoked by
the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") in proceedings  instituted
by Matrix or others.  During an  opposition  proceeding  in Japan,  the  Company
became  aware of a  reference  which may affect  the scope of its United  States
Patent  claims  which cover the collagen  gel matrix  products.  The Company has
brought this  reference to the attention of the PTO for a  determination  of the
extent to which the claims  should be  modified in light of this  reference.  No
assurance can be given concerning the outcome of the determination, although the
Company  believes that  modifications of the claims that may be required because
of the reference will not materially adversely affect the Company's  proprietary
protection  for its  products.  In addition,  no assurance can be given that the
Company's  patents  will afford  protection  against  competitors  with  similar
compounds or technologies,  that others will not obtain patents claiming aspects
similar to those covered by the Company's  patents or applications,  or that the
patents of others will not have an adverse  effect on the ability of the Company
to do business.  Moreover,  the Company believes that obtaining  foreign patents
may be more difficult than obtaining  domestic patents because of differences in
patent laws, and recognizes that its patent  position  therefore may be stronger
in the United  States than  abroad.  In  addition,  the  protection  provided by
foreign  patents,  once they are  obtained,  may be weaker than that provided by
domestic patents.


                                                                         Page 15
<PAGE>


Rapid Technological Change and Substantial Competition

         The  pharmaceutical  industry  is  subject  to  rapid  and  substantial
technological   change.   Technological   competition   in  the  industry   from
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, universities,  governmental entities
and others  diversifying  into the field is intense and is expected to increase.
Most of these  entities  have  significantly  greater  research and  development
capabilities, as well as substantially more marketing,  financial and managerial
resources,  and represent significant competition for the Company.  Acquisitions
of, or investments in, competing biotechnology companies by large pharmaceutical
companies  could  increase  such  competitors'  financial,  marketing  and other
resources. There can be no assurance that developments by others will not render
the Company's  products or technologies  noncompetitive or that the Company will
be able to keep pace with technological developments. Competitors have developed
or are in the process of developing  technologies that are, or in the future may
be,  the basis for  competitive  products.  Some of these  products  may have an
entirely  different  approach  or means  of  accomplishing  similar  therapeutic
effects than products being developed by the Company.  These competing  products
may be more  effective  and less  costly  than  the  products  developed  by the
Company. In addition, conventional drug therapy, surgery and other more familiar
treatments and modalities will offer competition to the Company's products.

         Any product which the Company  succeeds in developing  and for which it
gains  regulatory  approval must then compete for market  acceptance  and market
share. Accordingly,  important competitive factors, in addition to completion of
clinical  testing and the gaining of regulatory  approval  will include  product
efficacy,  safety,  timing and scope of regulatory  approvals,  availability  of
supply,  marketing and sales  capability,  reimbursement  coverage,  pricing and
patent protection.

Uncertainty of Pharmaceutical Pricing; No Assurance of Adequate Reimbursement

         The future revenues and  profitability  of and  availability of capital
for  biopharmaceutical  companies may be affected by the  continuing  efforts of
governmental  and third  party  payors to  contain or reduce the costs of health
care through various means.  For example,  in certain foreign markets pricing or
profitability of prescription  pharmaceuticals is subject to government control.
In the United States,  there have been, and the Company  expects that there will
continue to be, a number of federal and state  proposals  to  implement  similar
government   control.   While  the  Company  cannot  predict  whether  any  such
legislative  or  regulatory  proposals  will be  adopted,  the  announcement  or
adoption of such proposals could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
prospects. Additionally, the cost of prescription drugs is receiving substantial
attention  in the United  States  Congress.  Legislation  enacted  in 1990,  and
amended and  strengthened  in 1992,  requires  pharmaceutical  manufacturers  to
rebate to the  government a portion of their  revenues  from drugs  furnished to
Medicaid  patients.  In  1992,   legislation  was  enacted  that  extends  these
requirements to cover outpatient pharmaceuticals,  and also mandates a reduction
in pharmaceutical prices charged to certain federally-funded  facilities as well
as to certain hospitals serving a disproportionate share of low-income patients.
It is likely that Congressional  attention will continue to focus on the cost of
drugs  generally,  and particularly on increases in drug prices in excess of the
rate of inflation, given recent government initiatives pertaining to the overall
reform of the U.S.  health  care  system,  and those  specifically  directed  at
lowering  total costs.  The Company  cannot predict the likelihood of passage of
federal and state  legislation  related to health  care reform or lowering  drug
costs.


                                                                         Page 16
<PAGE>


         The Company's ability to commercialize  its products  successfully will
depend in part on the extent which appropriate reimbursement levels for the cost
of such products and related treatment are obtained from government authorities,
private  health  insurers and other  organizations,  such as health  maintenance
organizations  ("HMOs").  Third-party  payors are  increasingly  challenging the
prices  charged for medical  products  and  services.  Also,  the trend  towards
managed  health  care  in  the  United  States  and  the  concurrent  growth  of
organizations  such as HMOs, which could control or significantly  influence the
purchase of health care services and products,  as well as legislative proposals
to reform health care or reduce government insurance programs, may all result in
lower prices for the  Company's  products.  The cost  containment  measures that
health care payors and  providers are  instituting  and the effect of any health
care reform could  adversely  affect the Company's  ability to sell its products
and may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Dependence Upon Qualified and Key Personnel

         Because  of the  specialized  nature  of the  Company's  business,  the
Company's ability to maintain its competitive position depends on its ability to
attract and retain qualified  management and scientific  personnel.  Competition
for such  personnel is intense.  There can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to continue to attract or retain such persons. The loss of key personnel
or the failure to recruit  additional  personnel  could have a material  adverse
effect on the Company's business.

Product Liability Exposure; Limited Insurance Coverage

         The  Company  faces an  inherent  business  risk of exposure to product
liability  claims in the  event  that the use of  products  during  research  or
commercialization results in adverse effects. While the Company will continue to
attempt to take appropriate precautions,  there can be no assurance that it will
avoid  significant  product  liability  exposure.  The Company maintains product
liability  insurance for clinical  studies.  However,  there can be no assurance
that such  coverage  will be adequate or that  adequate  insurance  coverage for
future  clinical  or  commercial  activities  will be  available  at all,  or at
acceptable  cost,  or  that a  product  liability  claim  would  not  materially
adversely affect the business or financial condition of the Company.

Hazardous Materials and Product Risks

         The Company's  research and development  involves the controlled use of
hazardous  materials,  such as  cytotoxic  drugs,  other toxic and  carcinogenic
chemicals and various radioactive compounds.  Although the Company believes that
its safety  procedures for handling and disposing of such materials  comply with
the standards  prescribed by federal,  state and local regulations,  the risk of
accidental  contamination  or injury from these  materials  cannot be completely
eliminated.  In the event of such an accident,  the Company could be held liable
for any damages that result,  and any such  liability  could be  extensive.  The
Company is also  subject to  substantial  regulation  relating  to  occupational
health and safety,  environmental  protection,  hazardous substance control, and
waste management and disposal. The failure to comply with such regulations could
subject the Company to, among other things, fines and criminal liability.

         Certain of the  chemotherapeutic  agents employed by the Company in its
Therapeutic  Implant,  ADV and Therapeutic  Adhesive  products are known to have
toxic  side  effects,   particularly   when  used  in  traditional   methods  of
administration.  Each product  incorporating such a chemotherapeutic  agent will
require  separate  FDA  approval  as a new drug under the  procedures  specified
above.  Bovine  collagen is a  significant  component of the  Company's  protein
matrix.  Two rare autoimmune  connective  tissue  conditions,  polymyositis  and
dermatomyositis  ("PM/DM"),  have been alleged to occur with increased frequency
in patients  who have  received  cosmetic  collagen  treatments.  Based upon the
occurrence of these conditions, the FDA requested a major 


                                                                         Page 17
<PAGE>


manufacturer   of  bovine  collagen   products  for  cosmetic   applications  to
investigate the safety of such uses of its collagen.  In October 1991, an expert
panel  convened  by  the  FDA to  examine  this  issue  found  no  statistically
significant  relationships  between  injectable  collagen and the  occurrence of
autoimmune  disease,  but noted that certain  limitations  in the available data
made it difficult to establish a statistically significant association.

Volatility of Stock Price; No Dividends

         The market prices for securities of biopharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies  (including the Company) have historically  been highly volatile,  and
the  market  has from time to time  experienced  significant  price  and  volume
fluctuations  that are  unrelated to the  operating  performance  of  particular
companies. Future announcements concerning the Company, its competitors or other
biopharmaceutical products,  governmental regulation,  developments in patent or
other  proprietary  rights,  litigation  or public  concern  as to the safety of
products  developed by the Company or others and general  market  conditions may
have a significant  effect on the market price of the Common Stock.  The Company
has not paid any cash  dividends  on its  Common  Stock and does not  anticipate
paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

         Future sales of shares by existing  stockholders could adversely affect
the prevailing  market price of the Company's  Common Stock. On August 26, 1994,
the Company  sold 13,334  shares of Series A  Convertible  Preferred  Stock (the
"Preferred  Stock") in a private placement,  and registered  1,333,400 shares of
Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred  Stock.  During the first
quarter of 1996, 13,334  outstanding  shares of the Company's Series A preferred
stock were  converted into 1,333,400  shares of the Company's  common stock.  On
August 29, 1995, the Company sold 1,481,982  shares of Common Stock in a private
placement  and  simultaneously  registered  the  resale  of  such  shares  on  a
Registration  Statement on Form S-3.  The  outstanding  shares of the  Company's
Common Stock are all freely tradeable,  subject to volume and other restrictions
imposed  by Rule  144  under  the  Securities  Act  with  respect  to  sales  by
affiliates.  Sales of  substantial  amounts of Common  Stock may have an adverse
effect on the market price of the Common Stock.

Anti-Takeover Provisions

         The ability of the Board of Directors of the Company to issue shares of
Preferred  Stock  without  stockholder  approval and a  stockholder  rights plan
adopted by the Company may, alone or in combination,  have certain anti-takeover
effects.  The Company  also is subject to  provisions  of the  Delaware  General
Corporation Law which may make certain business combinations more difficult.


                                                                         Page 18

<PAGE>

                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.


Item 6.           Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

                  (a)      Exhibits

                           27      Financial Data Schedule


                  (b)      Reports on Form 8-K

                The Company filed a Current  Report on Form 8-K on March 1, 1996
                with  respect  to the filing by the  Company  of a  registration
                statement on Form S-3.


                                                                         Page 19

<PAGE>

                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.


                                    SIGNATURE




Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                           MATRIX PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.





Date:    May  3,  1996                 By:       /s/ James R. Glynn
      --------------------             -----------------------------------------
                                                 James R. Glynn
                                                 Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer & Secretary




                                 Signing on behalf of the registrant
                                 and as principal financial officer


                                                                         Page 20


<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         33,656
<SECURITIES>                                   35,903
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               58,601
<PP&E>                                         19,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 86,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,990
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                      153,755
                               0
                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (705)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   86,930
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00
        



</TABLE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission