<PAGE>
40 ACT FILE NO. 811-2271
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-6
For Registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of Securities of Unit
Investment Trusts Registered on Form N-8B-2.
A. Exact Name of Trust: NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST, SERIES 742
B. Name of Depositor: JOHN NUVEEN & CO. INCORPORATED
C. Complete address of Depositor's principal executive offices:
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
D. Name and complete address of agents for service:
JOHN NUVEEN & CO. INCORPORATED
Attn: James J. Wesolowski
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
CHAPMAN AND CUTLER
Attn: Daniel C. Bird, Jr.
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box)
_____
_____ immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
_____
_____ on (date) pursuant to paragraph (b) of rule 485
_____
_____ 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)
_____
_____ on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a) of rule (485 or 486)
E. Title and amount of securities being registered: An indefinite number of
Units pursuant to Rule 24f-2 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended.
F. Proposed maximum offering price to the public of the securities being
registered: Indefinite
G. Amount of filing fee: $500 (as required by Rule 24f-2)
H. Approximate date of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after the effective
date of the registration statement
- ----- Check box if it is proposed that this filing will become effective
- ----- on (Date) at (Time) pursuant to Rule 487.
______________________________________________________________________________
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant
shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this
Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with
Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting
pursuant to said Section 8(a) may determine.
<PAGE>
JULY 14, 1994
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
NUVEEN Tax-Exempt Unit Trusts
PROSPECTUS
Series 739
July 14, 1994
INTEREST INCOME TO THE TRUSTS AND TO UNITHOLDERS, IN THE OPINION OF COUNSEL,
UNDER EXISTING LAW IS EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL INCOME TAX. CAPITAL GAINS, IF ANY, ARE
SUBJECT TO TAX. IN ADDITION, INTEREST INCOME OF STATE TRUSTS IS, IN THE OPINION
OF COUNSEL, EXEMPT, TO THE EXTENT INDICATED, FROM STATE AND LOCAL TAXES.
INTEREST INCOME OF ANY TRUST OTHER THAN A STATE TRUST MAY BE SUBJECT TO STATE
AND LOCAL TAXES.
CURRENTLY OFFERED AT PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE PLUS INTEREST ACCRUED TO THE DATE OF
SETTLEMENT. MINIMUM PURCHASE--EITHER $5,000 OR 50 UNITS, WHICHEVER IS LESS.
THE NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST, SERIES 739 consists of four underlying
separate unit investment trusts designated as California Insured Trust 228,
Massachusetts Insured Trust 115, New Jersey Insured Trust 177 and Pennsylvania
Insured Trust 183. Each Trust initially consists of delivery statements relating
to contracts to purchase Bonds and, thereafter, will consist of a diversified
portfolio of obligations issued by or on behalf of states and territories of the
United States and authorities and political subdivisions thereof (see SCHEDULES
OF INVESTMENTS), the interest on which is, in the opinion of bond counsel to the
issuers, exempt from Federal income tax under existing law. In addition, the
interest on Bonds in each State Trust is, in the opinion of bond counsel to the
issuers of the obligations, exempt from such State's income taxes, if any. All
obligations in each Traditional Trust are rated in the category "A" or better by
Standard & Poor's Corporation or Moody's Investors Service, Inc. on the Date of
Deposit. All obligations in each Insured Trust are covered by policies of
insurance obtained from the Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation
guaranteeing payment of principal and interest when due. All such policies of
insurance remain effective so long as the obligations are outstanding. As a
result of such insurance, the Bonds in each portfolio of the Insured Trusts have
received a rating of "Aaa" by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and the Bonds in
the Insured Trusts and the Units of each such Trust have received a rating of
"AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation. INSURANCE RELATES ONLY TO THE BONDS IN
THE INSURED TRUSTS AND NOT TO THE UNITS OFFERED HEREBY OR TO THEIR MARKET VALUE.
(See Section 5.)
THE OBJECTIVES of the Trusts are tax-exempt income and conservation of capital
through a diversified investment in tax-exempt Bonds. (SEE SECTIONS 2, 3 AND
11.) The payment of interest and the preservation of principal are, of course,
dependent upon the continuing ability of the issuers of Bonds and of any insurer
thereof to meet their obligations thereunder. There is no guarantee that the
Trusts' objectives will be achieved.
DISTRIBUTIONS of interest received by each Trust will be made semi-annually
unless the Unitholder elects to receive them monthly or quarterly. (SEE SECTION
13.) Distribution of funds in the Principal Account, if any, will ordinarily be
made semi-annually.
FOR ESTIMATED LONG TERM RETURNS AND ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURNS to Unitholders in
each Trust on the business day prior to the Date of Deposit. (SEE PAGE 3 AND
SECTION 9.)
THE PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE per Unit of each Trust during the initial offering
period is equal to a pro rata share of the OFFERING prices of the Bonds in such
Trust's portfolio plus a sales charge of up to 4.90% of the Public Offering
Price (equivalent to 5.152% of the net amount invested); the sales charge is
somewhat lower on Trusts with lesser average maturities. (SEE SECTION 6.) The
Secondary Market Public Offering Price per Unit for each Trust will be equal to
a pro rata share of the sum of BID prices of the Bonds in such Trust plus the
sales charges determined based on the number of years remaining to the maturity
of each Bond. Accrued interest from the preceding Record Date to, but not
including, the settlement date (normally five business days after purchase) is
added to the Public Offering Price. The sales charge is reduced on a graduated
scale for sales involving at least $50,000 or 500 Units and will be applied on
whichever basis is more favorable to the purchaser. (SEE SECTION 6.)
A UNITHOLDER MAY REDEEM UNITS at the office of the Trustee, United States Trust
Company of New York, at prices based upon the BID prices of the Bonds. The price
received upon redemption may be more or less than the amount paid by
Unitholders, depending upon the value of the Bonds on the date of tender for
redemption. (SEE SECTION 19.) The Sponsor, although not required to do so,
intends to make a secondary market for the Units of the Trusts at prices based
upon the BID prices of the Bonds in the respective Trusts. (SEE SECTION 7.)
RETAIN THIS PROSPECTUS FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.
UNITS OF THE TRUST ARE NOT DEPOSITS OR OBLIGATIONS OF, OR GUARANTEED OR ENDORSED
BY, ANY BANK AND ARE NOT FEDERALLY INSURED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY THE FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE FEDERAL RE-
SERVE BOARD OR ANY OTHER AGENCY AND INVOLVE INVESTMENT RISK, INCLUDING THE
POSSIBLE LOSS OF PRINCIPAL.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
<PAGE>
NUVEEN Tax-Exempt Unit Trusts
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Index Section Page
<C> <S> <C> <C>
SPECIFIC TRUST MATTERS
California Insured Trust 228 3 8-20
Massachusetts Insured Trust 115 3 21-31
New Jersey Insured Trust 177 3 32-39
Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183 3 40-48
GENERAL MATTERS
Accrued Interest 8 A-16
Accumulation Plan 14 A-24
Bonds, How Selected 3 7
Bonds, Initial Determination of Offering Price 10 A-18
Bonds, Limited Right of Substitution 4 A-7
Bond Ratings 3 8-48
Bonds, Removal from Trust 21 A-32
Call Provisions of Portfolio Bonds 3, 4 8-48,A-6
Capital Gains Taxability 11 A-18
Dealer Discount 17 A-28
Description of Units of Trust 1 5
Distributions to Unitholders 13 A-22
Distribution Payment Dates 3, 13 8-48, A-22
Distribution of Units to the Public 17 A-28
Essential Information Regarding the Trusts -- 4
Estimated Long Term Return and Estimated Current
Return 9 3, A-17
Evaluation 16 A-28
Expenses to Fund 12 A-21
Insurance on Bonds in the Insured Trusts 5 A-9
Insurance on Certain Bonds in the Traditional
Trusts 5 A-12
Interest Income to Trust 3 8-48
Investments, Schedules of 3 8-48
Legality of Units 24 A-36
Limitations on Liabilities of Sponsor and Trustee 22 A-33
Market for Units 7 A-15
Minimum Transaction 17 A-28
Objectives of the Trusts 2 6
Optional Distribution Plan 13 A-22
Other Information 24 A-35
Ownership and Transfer of Units 18 A-29
Public Offering Price of Units 6 A-12
Quantity Purchases 6 A-12
Record Dates 13 A-22
Ratings, Description of 24 A-37
Redemption of Units by Trustee 19 A-30
Reports to Unitholders 15 A-27
Repurchase of Units by Sponsor 20 A-32
Sales Charge 6 A-12
Sponsor, Information About 23 A-34
State Tax Status 3 8-48
Successor Trustees and Sponsors 22 A-34
Tax Status of Unitholders 11 A-18
Trustee, Information About 22 A-33
Trust Indenture, Amendment and Termination 24 A-35
Unit Value 16 A-28
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
ESTIMATED LONG TERM RETURNS
AND
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURNS FOR THE TRUSTS
Following are the Estimated Long Term and Estimated Current Returns for each
Trust on the business day prior to the Date of Deposit, under the monthly,
quarterly and semi-annual plans of distribution (SEE SECTION 3):
Estimated Long Term Returns
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
----------------------------------------
TRUST MONTHLY QUARTERLY SEMI-ANNUAL
<S> <C> <C> <C>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Insured Trust 228............. 5.84% 5.87% 5.89%
Massachusetts Insured Trust 115.......... 5.81% 5.85% 5.87%
New Jersey Insured Trust 177............. 5.77% 5.80% 5.82%
Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183........... 5.79% 5.83% 5.85%
</TABLE>
Estimated Current Returns
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
----------------------------------------
TRUST MONTHLY QUARTERLY SEMI-ANNUAL
<S> <C> <C> <C>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Insured Trust 228............. 5.72% 5.75% 5.77%
Massachusetts Insured Trust 115.......... 5.70% 5.73% 5.75%
New Jersey Insured Trust 177............. 5.67% 5.70% 5.72%
Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183........... 5.74% 5.77% 5.79%
</TABLE>
The Estimated Long Term Return for each Trust is a measure of the return to
the investor earned over the estimated life of the Trust. The Estimated Long
Term Return represents an average of the yields to maturity (or call) of the
Bonds in the Trust's portfolio calculated in accordance with accepted bond
practice and adjusted to reflect expenses and sales charges. Under accepted bond
practice, tax-exempt bonds are customarily offered to investors on a "yield
price" basis, which involves computation of yield to maturity or to an earlier
call date (whichever produces the lower yield), and which takes into account not
only the interest payable on the bonds but also the amortization or accretion to
a specified date of any premium over or discount from the par (maturity) value
in the bond's purchase price. In calculating Estimated Long Term Return, the
average yield for the Trust's portfolio is derived by weighting each Bond's
yield by the market value of the Bond and by the amount of time remaining to the
date to which the Bond is priced. Once the average portfolio yield is computed,
this figure is then reduced to reflect estimated expenses and the effect of the
maximum sales charge paid by investors. The Estimated Long Term Return and
Estimated Current Return calculations do not take into account the effect of a
first distribution which may be less than a regular distribution or may be paid
at some point after 30 days (or a second distribution which may be less than a
normal distribution for Unitholders who choose quarterly or semi-annual plans of
distribution), and it also does not take into account the difference in timing
of payments to Unitholders who choose quarterly or semi-annual plans of
distribution, each of which will reduce the return.
Estimated Current Return is computed by dividing the Net Annual Interest
Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. In contrast to Estimated Long Term
Return, Estimated Current Return does not reflect the amortization of premium or
accretion of discount, if any, on the Bonds in the Trust's portfolio. Net Annual
Interest Income per Unit is calculated by dividing the annual interest income to
the Trust, less estimated expenses, by the number of Units outstanding.
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit, used to calculate Estimated Current
Return, will vary with changes in fees and expenses of the Trustee and the
Evaluator and with the redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Bonds. A Trust
may experience expenses and portfolio changes different from those assumed in
the calculation of Estimated Long Term Return. There thus can be no assurance
that the Estimated Current Returns or the Estimated Long Term Returns quoted
herein will be realized in the future. Both the Estimated Current Return and the
Estimated Long Term Return quoted herein are based on the market value of the
underlying Bonds on the business day prior to the Date of Deposit; subsequent
calculations of these performance measures will reflect the then current market
value of the underlying Bonds and may be higher or lower. For more information,
see Section 9. The Sponsor will provide estimated cash flow information relating
to a Trust without charge to each potential investor in a Trust who receives
this prospectus and makes an oral or written request to the Sponsor for such
information.
3
<PAGE>
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE TRUSTS ON
JULY 13, 1994+
Sponsor and Evaluator...... John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated
Trustee........... United States Trust Company of New York
-------------------------------------------
The income, expense and distribution data set forth below have been calculated
for Unitholders receiving MONTHLY distributions. Unitholders choosing
distributions quarterly or semi-annually will receive slightly higher returns
because of the lower Trustee's fees and expenses under such plans. (SEE SECTION
3 FOR DATA RELATING TO THESE PLANS.)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
California Massachusetts New Jersey Pennsylvania
Insured Insured Insured Insured
Trust 228 Trust 115 Trust 177 Trust 183
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Principal Amount of Bonds in Trust.................. $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000
Number of Units..................................... 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Fractional Undivided Interest in Trust Per Unit..... 1/35,000 1/35,000 1/35,000 1/35,000
Public Offering Price--Less than 500 Units
Aggregate Offering Price of Bonds in Trust...... $ 3,271,710 $ 3,322,791 $ 3,306,583 $ 3,340,275
Divided by Number of Units...................... $ 93.48 $ 94.94 $ 94.47 $ 95.44
Plus Sales Charge*.............................. $ 4.82 $ 4.89 $ 4.87 $ 4.92
Public Offering Price Per Unit(1)............... $ 98.30 $ 99.83 $ 99.34 $ 100.36
Redemption Price Per Unit (exclusive of accrued
interest)......................................... $ 92.98 $ 94.46 $ 93.95 $ 94.94
Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price Per Unit
(exclusive of accrued interest)................... $ 93.48 $ 94.94 $ 94.47 $ 95.44
Excess of Public Offering Price Per Unit over
Redemption Price Per Unit......................... $ 5.32 $ 5.37 $ 5.39 $ 5.42
Excess of Public Offering Price Per Unit over
Sponsor's Repurchase Price Per Unit............... $ 4.82 $ 4.89 $ 4.87 $ 4.92
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Interest Income
Per Unit
Annual Interest Income(2)....................... $ 5.8500 $ 5.9164 $ 5.8596 $ 5.9875
Less Estimated Annual Expense................... $ .2303 $ .2280 $ .2289 $ .2269
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income(3)......... $ 5.6197 $ 5.6884 $ 5.6307 $ 5.7606
Daily Rate of Accrual Per Unit...................... $ .01561 $ .01580 $ .01564 $ .01600
Estimated Current Return(4)......................... 5.72% 5.70% 5.67% 5.74%
Estimated Long Term Return(4)....................... 5.84% 5.81% 5.77% 5.79%
BECAUSE CERTAIN OF THE BONDS IN THE TRUSTS WILL NOT BE DELIVERED TO THE TRUSTEE UNTIL AFTER THE SETTLEMENT DATE FOR A PURCHASE OF
UNITS MADE ON THE DATE OF DEPOSIT, INTEREST THAT ACCRUES ON THOSE BONDS BETWEEN THE DATE OF DEPOSIT AND SUCH DELIVERY DATE WILL
BE TREATED AS A RETURN OF PRINCIPAL RATHER THAN AS TAX-EXEMPT INCOME. THE AMOUNT OF ANY SUCH RETURN OF PRINCIPAL IS NOT INCLUDED
IN THE ANNUAL INTEREST INCOME SHOWN ABOVE. FOR THE VARIOUS TRUSTS, THE FOLLOWING SETS FORTH THE LATEST SCHEDULED BOND DELIVERY
DATE, THE AMOUNT PER UNIT THAT WILL BE TREATED AS A RETURN OF PRINCIPAL TO UNITHOLDERS WHO PURCHASE ON THE DATE OF DEPOSIT, AND
THE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN AFTER THE FIRST YEAR, ASSUMING THE PORTFOLIO AND ESTIMATED ANNUAL EXPENSES DO NOT VARY FROM THAT SET
FORTH ABOVE (SEE SECTIONS 3 AND 12 AND THE "SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS"):
LATEST SCHEDULED PER UNIT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
DELIVERY DATE RETURN OF PRINCIPAL AFTER THE FIRST YEAR
------------------ -------------------- -------------------------
MASSACHUSETTS INSURED TRUST... JULY 28, 1994 $ .02 5.72 %
NEW JERSEY INSURED TRUST...... AUGUST 2, 1994 $ .03 5.70 %
PENNSYLVANIA INSURED TRUST.... JULY 29, 1994 $ .02 5.76 %
<FN>
- ----------
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made as of 4 p.m. Eastern time on the business day next
following receipt of an order by the Sponsor or Trustee. (See Section 6.)
+ The business day prior to the Date of Deposit.
* National and State, 5.152%; Long Intermediate, 4.439%; Intermediate, 4.058%; Short Intermediate, 3.093%; Short Term, 2.564%
(4.9%, 4.25%, 3.9%, 3.0% and 2.5% of the Public Offering Prices, respectively.)
(1) Units are offered at the Public Offering Price plus accrued interest from the preceding Record Date to, but not including,
the date of settlement (normally five business days after purchase). The Date of Deposit of the Fund has been designated as
the First Record Date for all plans of distribution of the Trusts and, accordingly, for Units purchased on the Date of
Deposit, the following amounts of accrued interest to the Settlement Date will be added to the Public Offering Prices:
California Insured Trust--$.11, Massachusetts Insured Trust--$.11, New Jersey Insured Trust--$.11 and Pennsylvania Insured
Trust--$.11. (See Section 8.)
(2) Assumes delivery of all Bonds. (See Section 4.) Interest income does not include accretion of original issue discount on
"zero coupon" Bonds, Stripped Obligations or other original issue discount Bonds. (See "General Trust Information" in Section
3.)
(3) The amount and timing of interest distributions from each Trust under the various plans of distribution are shown in Section
3.
(4) Estimated Long Term Return for each Trust represents the average of the yields to maturity (or call) of the Bonds in the
Trust's portfolio calculated in accordance with accepted bond practices and adjusted to reflect expenses and sales charges.
Estimated Current Return is computed by dividing the Net Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price, and in
contrast to Estimated Long Term Return does not reflect the amortization of premium or accretion of discount, if any. For
more information see page 3 and Section 9.
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE>
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE TRUSTS
(CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Record Dates......................................................................See Section 13
Distribution Dates................................................................See Section 13
Minimum Principal Distribution....................................................$0.10 Per Unit
Date Trusts Established............................................................July 14, 1994
Settlement Date....................................................................July 21, 1994
Mandatory Termination Date........................................................See Section 24
Minimum Value of Each Trust.......................................................See Section 24
Sponsor's Annual Evaluation Fee.......................$0.17 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Trustee's Annual Fees:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
------------------------------------------
TRUST MONTHLY QUARTERLY SEMI-ANNUAL
----------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
California Insured Trust 228............. $ 1.6719 $ 1.3519 $ 1.1619
Massachusetts Insured Trust 115.......... 1.6494 1.3294 1.1394
New Jersey Insured Trust 177............. 1.6586 1.3386 1.1486
Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183........... 1.6382 1.3182 1.1282
------------
* Each Trustee annual fee is per $1,000 principal amount of the underlying Bonds in a
Trust for that portion of the Trust that represents a particular plan of distribution.
</TABLE>
---------------------------
THE NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST
SERIES 739
1. WHAT IS THE NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST, SERIES 739?
Series 739 of the Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust is one of a series of separate
but similar investment companies created by the Sponsor, each of which is
designated by a different Series number. This Series consists of four underlying
separate unit investment trusts, combined under one trust indenture and
agreement, designated California Insured Trust 228, Massachusetts Insured Trust
115, New Jersey Insured Trust 177 and Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183. The
various trusts are collectively referred to herein as the "Trusts"; the trusts
in which few or none of the Bonds are insured are sometimes referred to as the
"Traditional Trusts", the trusts in which all of the Bonds are insured as
described herein are sometimes referred to as the "Insured Trusts", and the
state trusts (both Traditional and Insured) are sometimes referred to as the
"State Trusts." THERE ARE NO TRADITIONAL TRUSTS IN THIS SERIES. This Series was
created under the laws of the State of New York pursuant to a Trust Indenture
and Agreement dated July 14, 1994 (the "Indenture") between John Nuveen & Co.
Incorporated (the "Sponsor") and United States Trust Company of New York (the
"Trustee").
The Sponsor has deposited with the Trustee delivery statements relating to
contracts for the purchase of municipal debt obligations together with funds
represented by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a major commercial bank
in the amount, including accrued interest, required for their purchase (or the
obligations themselves) in the principal amount of $14,000,000 (the "Bonds"),
which initially constitute the underlying securities of the
5
<PAGE>
Trusts. Bonds may include fixed rate obligations with regularly scheduled
interest payments, zero coupon bonds and stripped obligations, which represent
evidences of ownership interests with respect to either a principal payment or a
payment of interest on a tax-exempt obligation ("Stripped Obligations"). See
"SUMMARY OF PORTFOLIOS" and "GENERAL TRUST INFORMATION" for a discussion of zero
coupon bonds and Stripped Obligations. The following principal amounts were
deposited in each Trust: $3,500,000 in the California Insured Trust, $3,500,000
in the Massachusetts Insured Trust, $3,500,000 in the New Jersey Insured Trust
and $3,500,000 in the Pennsylvania Insured Trust. Some of the delivery
statements may relate to contracts for the purchase of "when issued" or other
Bonds with delivery dates after the date of settlement for a purchase made on
the Date of Deposit. See the "Schedules of Investments" and Section 4. For a
discussion of the Sponsor's obligations in the event of a failure of any
contract for the purchase of any of the Bonds and its limited right to
substitute other bonds to replace any failed contract, see Section 4.
Payment of interest on the Bonds in each Insured Trust, and of principal at
maturity, is guaranteed under policies of insurance obtained by the Sponsor or
by the issuers of the Bonds. (See Section 5.) As a general matter, neither the
issuer nor the Sponsor has obtained insurance with respect to the Bonds in any
Traditional Trust.
The Trustee has delivered to the Sponsor registered Units for 35,000 Units
of the California Insured Trust, 35,000 Units of the Massachusetts Insured
Trust, 35,000 Units of the New Jersey Insured Trust and 35,000 Units of the
Pennsylvania Insured Trust, which together represent ownership of the entire
Series, and which are offered for sale by this Prospectus. Each Unit of a Trust
represents a fractional undivided interest in the principal and net income of
such Trust in the ratio of 10 Units for each $1,000 principal value of Bonds
initially deposited in such Trust.
2. WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE TRUSTS?
The objectives of the Trusts are income exempt from Federal income tax and, in
the case of State Trusts, where applicable, state income and intangibles taxes,
and conservation of capital, through an investment in obligations issued by or
on behalf of states and territories of the United States and authorities and
political subdivisions thereof, the interest on which is, in the opinion of
recognized bond counsel to the issuing governmental authorities, exempt from
Federal income tax under existing law. Bonds in any State Trust have been issued
primarily by or on behalf of the State for which such Trust is named and
counties, municipalities, authorities and political subdivisions thereof, the
interest on which Bonds is, in the opinion of bond counsel, exempt from Federal
and certain state income tax and intangibles taxes, if any, for purchasers who
qualify as residents of that State. Insurance guaranteeing the timely payment,
when due, of all principal and interest on the Bonds in each Insured Trust has
been obtained by the Sponsor or by the issuers of such Bonds from Municipal Bond
Investors Assurance Corporation, and as a result of such insurance the
obligations in the Insured Trusts are rated "Aaa" by Moody's Investors Service,
Inc. and "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation. (SEE SECTION 5)All obligations
in each Traditional Trust are rated in the category "A" or better (SP-1 or MIG 2
or better in the case of short term obligations included in a Short Term
Traditional Trust) by Standard & Poor's Corporation or Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. (including provisional or conditional ratings). In addition,
certain Bonds in certain Traditional Trusts may be covered by insurance
guaranteeing the timely payment, when due, of all principal and interest. (SEE
SECTION 3.) The portfolios of National and State Trusts consist of long-term
(approximately 15 to 40 year maturities) obligations; those of
6
<PAGE>
Long Intermediate Trusts consist of intermediate to long term (approximately 11
to 19 year maturities) obligations; those of Intermediate Trusts consist of
intermediate term (approximately 5 to 15 year maturities) obligations; those of
Short Intermediate Trusts consist of short to intermediate term (approximately 3
to 7 year maturities) obligations; and those of Short Term Trusts consist of
short term (approximately 1 to 5 year maturities) obligations. There is, of
course, no guarantee that the Trusts' objectives will be achieved. For a
comparison of net after-tax return for various tax brackets see the "Taxable
Equivalent Estimated Current Return Tables" included in this Prospectus.
Each Trust consists of fixed-rate municipal debt obligations. Because of
this an investment in a Trust should be made with an understanding of the risks
which an investment in such debt obligations may entail, including the risk that
the value of the debt obligations and therefore of the Units will decline with
increases in interest rates. In general, the longer the period until the
maturity of a Bond, the more sensitive its value will be to fluctuations in
interest rates. During the past decade, there have been substantial fluctuations
in interest rates, and, accordingly, in the value of debt obligations. The
Sponsor cannot predict whether such fluctuations will recur.
3. SUMMARY OF PORTFOLIOS
In selecting Bonds for the respective Trusts, the following factors, among
others, were considered: (i) the Standard & Poor's Corporation rating of the
Bonds or the Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating of the Bonds (see Section 2
for a description of minimum rating standards), (ii) the prices of the Bonds
relative to other bonds of comparable quality and maturity, (iii) the
diversification of Bonds as to purpose of issue and location of issuer, (iv) the
maturity dates of the Bonds, and (v) in the case of the Insured Trusts only, the
availability of Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation insurance on such
Bonds.
In order for Bonds in the Insured Trusts to be eligible for Municipal Bond
Investors Assurance Corporation insurance, they must have credit characteristics
which, in the opinion of the insurer, would qualify them as "investment grade"
obligations. Insurance is not a substitute for the basic credit of an issuer,
but supplements the existing credit and provides additional security therefor.
(SEE SECTION 5.)
Certain bonds may carry a "mandatory put" (also referred to as a "mandatory
tender" or "mandatory repurchase") feature pursuant to which the holder of such
bonds will receive payment of the full principal amount thereof on a stated date
prior to the maturity date unless such holder affirmatively acts to retain the
bond. Under the Indenture, the Trustee does not have the authority to act to
retain Bonds with such features; accordingly, it will receive payment of the
full principal amount of any such Bonds on the stated put date and such date is
therefore treated as the maturity date of such Bonds in selecting Bonds for the
respective Trusts and for purposes of calculating the average maturity of the
Bonds in any Trust.
7
<PAGE>
CALIFORNIA INSURED TRUST 228
The Portfolio of California Insured Trust 228 consists of 6 obligations
issued by entities located in California and one obligation issued by an entity
located in the Territory of Puerto Rico. Two Bonds in the Trust are general
obligations of the governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the
taxing powers thereof. Five Bonds in the Trust are payable as to principal and
interest from the income of a specific project or authority and are not
supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. The sources of payment for these
Bonds are divided as follows: Health Care Facility Revenue, 2; Municipal Lease
Revenue, 1; Water and/or Sewer Revenue, 2. All of the Bonds in the Trust, as
insured, are rated AAA by Standard & Poor's Corporation and Aaa by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc.
At the Date of Deposit, the average maturity of the Bonds in the California
Insured Trust is 28.2 years. The average maturity of the Bonds in a Trust is
calculated based upon the stated maturities of the Bonds in such Trust (or, with
respect to Bonds for which funds or securities have been placed in escrow to
redeem such Bonds on a stated call date, based upon such call date). The average
maturity of the Bonds in a Trust may increase or decrease from time to time as
Bonds mature or are called or sold.
Approximately 29% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds in the
Trust consists of obligations of issuers whose revenues are primarily derived
from the sale of water and/or sewerage services.
Approximately 29% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds in the
Trust consists of obligations of issuers whose revenues are primarily derived
from services provided by hospitals or other health care facilities.
For a discussion of the risks associated with investments in the bonds of
various issuers, see "General Trust Information" in this section.
The Sponsor entered into contracts to acquire the Bonds between July 12,
1994 and July 13, 1994. The following summarizes certain information about the
Bonds as of the business day prior to the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Difference between Trustee's
Determination of Offering Price and
Cost to Profit (or loss) Annual Interest Bid Price the Bid Price
Sponsor to Sponsor Income to Trust of Bonds (as % of principal amount)
---------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------- -----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$3,255,941 $15,769 $204,750 $3,254,210 .50%
</TABLE>
Neither cost to Sponsor nor profit (or loss) to Sponsor reflects
underwriting profits or losses received or incurred by the Sponsor through its
participation in underwriting syndicates. An underwriter or underwriting
syndicate purchases bonds from the issuer on a negotiated or competitive bid
basis as principal with the motive of marketing such bonds to investors at a
profit. The Sponsor did not participate as either the sole underwriter or as a
manager or member of a syndicate that acted as the original underwriter of any
of the Bonds.
Unitholders may elect to have interest distributions made on a monthly,
quarterly or semi-annual basis. The interest on the Bonds initially deposited in
the California Insured Trust, less estimated expenses, is estimated to accrue at
the rate of $.01575 per Unit per day under the semi-annual plan of distribution,
$.01569 per Unit per day under the quarterly plan of distribution and $.01561
per Unit per day under the monthly plan of distribution. It is anticipated that
the amount of interest to be distributed per Unit in each
8
<PAGE>
year under each plan of distribution will initially be substantially equal to
the Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit for that plan.
Details of interest distributions per Unit of the California Insured Trust
under the various plans appear in the following table based upon estimated Net
Annual Interest Income at the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Normal
Distributions
California Insured Trust 1994 1995 per Year
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
Record Date*.......................... 8/1 11/1 2/1 5/1
Distribution Date..................... 8/15 11/15 2/15 5/15
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly Distribution Plan............. $ .2653(1) $ 5.6197
-------- $.4683 every month --------
Quarterly Distribution Plan........... $ .2653(1) $ 1.4121(2) $ 1.4121 $ 1.4121 $ 5.6517
Semi-Annual Distribution Plan......... $ .2653(1) $ 1.4175(3) $ 2.8350 $ 5.6707
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
* Record Dates for semi-annual distributions are May 1 and November 1; for quarterly distributions, they are February 1, May 1,
August 1 and November 1. Record Dates for monthly distributions are the first day of each month.
(1) The first distribution will be paid to all Unitholders, regardless of the distribution plan selected. Such distribution may
be more or less than a regular monthly distribution.
(2) Regular 3-month distribution.
(3) The second distribution under the semi-annual distribution plan represents a 3-month distribution; subsequent semi-annual
distributions will be regular 6-month distributions.
</TABLE>
The accrual amounts set forth above, and in turn the amount of interest to
be distributed annually per Unit, will generally change as Bonds are redeemed,
mature or are sold or as fees and expenses increase or decrease.
TAX STATUS--CALIFORNIA INSURED TRUST
For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on California
Insured Trust Units, see Section 11.
In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, special California counsel
to the Series, under existing California income and property tax law applicable
to individuals who are California residents:
The California Insured Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation and the income of the California Insured Trust will be treated
as the income of the Unitholders under the income tax laws of California.
Interest on the underlying securities (which may include bonds or other
obligations issued by the governments of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands,
Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands) which is exempt from tax under
California personal income tax and property tax laws when received by the
California Insured Trust will, under such laws, retain its status as
tax-exempt interest when distributed to Unitholders. However, interest on
the underlying securities attributed to a Unitholder which is a corporation
subject to the California franchise tax laws may be includable in its gross
income for purposes of determining its California franchise tax.
Under California income tax law, each Unitholder in the California
Insured Trust will have a taxable event when the California Insured Trust
disposes of a security (whether by sale, exchange, redemption or payment at
maturity) or when the Unitholder redeems or sells Units. Because of the
requirement that tax cost basis be reduced to reflect amortization of bond
premium, under some circumstances a Unitholder may realize taxable gain when
Units are sold or redeemed for an amount
9
<PAGE>
equal to, or less than, their original cost. The total tax cost of each Unit
to a Unitholder is allocated among each of the bond issues held in the
California Insured Trust (in accordance with the proportion of the
California Insured Trust comprised by each bond issue) in order to determine
his per unit tax cost for each bond issue; and the tax cost reduction
requirements relating to amortization of bond premium will apply separately
to the per unit cost of each bond issue. Unitholders' bases in their Units,
and the bases for their fractional interest in each California Insured Trust
asset, may have to be adjusted for their pro rata share of accrued interest
received, if any, on securities delivered after the Unitholders' respective
settlement dates.
Under the California personal property tax laws, bonds (including the
bonds in the California Insured Trust as well as "regular-way" and
"when-issued" contracts for the purchase of bonds) or any interest therein
is exempt from such tax.
Any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the Trustee of
the fund with respect to the bonds in the California Insured Trust as well
as "regular-way" and "when-issued" contracts for the purchase of bonds which
represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee
will be exempt from California personal income tax if, and to the same
extent as, such interest would have been so exempt if paid by the issuer of
the defaulted obligations.
Under Section 17280(b)(2) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code,
interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry Units of
the California Insured Trust is not deductible for the purposes of the
California personal income tax. While there presently is no California
authority interpreting this provision, Section 17280(b)(2) directs the
California Franchise Tax Board to prescribe regulations determining the
proper allocation and apportionment of interest costs for this purpose. The
Franchise Tax Board has not yet proposed or prescribed such regulations. In
interpreting the generally similar Federal provision, the Internal Revenue
Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need not be directly
traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units (although the Service has not
contended that a deduction for interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase
or improve a personal residence or to purchase goods or services for
personal consumption will be disallowed). In the absence of conflicting
regulations or other California authority, the California Franchise Tax
Board generally has interpreted California statutory tax provisions in
accord with Internal Revenue Service interpretations of similar Federal
provisions.
ECONOMIC FACTORS--CALIFORNIA
As described above, except to the extent the Fund invests in temporary
investments, the Fund will invest substantially all of its assets in California
Municipal Obligations. The Fund is therefore susceptible to political, economic
or regulatory factors affecting issuers of California Municipal Obligations.
These include the possible adverse effects of certain California constitutional
amendments, legislative measures, voter initiatives and other matters that are
described below. The following information provides only a brief summary of the
complex factors affecting the financial situation in California (the "State")
and is derived from sources that are generally available to investors and are
believed to be accurate. No independent verification has been made of the
accuracy or completeness of any of the following information. It is based in
part on information obtained from various State and local agencies in California
or contained in Official Statements for various California Municipal
Obligations.
10
<PAGE>
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local governmental finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of California Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Fund or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
California's economy is the largest among the 50 states and one of the
largest in the world. The State's population of almost 32 million represents
12.3% of the total United States population and grew by 27% in the 1980s. Total
personal income in the State, at an estimated $662 billion in 1992, accounts for
13% of all personal income in the nation. Total employment is almost 14 million,
the majority of which is in the service, trade and manufacturing sectors.
Reports issued by the State Department of Finance and other sources indicate
that the State's economy is suffering its worst recession since the 1930s, with
prospects for recovery slower than for the nation as a whole. The State has
experienced the worst job losses in any postwar recession and employment levels
are not expected to stabilize until late 1994 or 1995. Pre-recession job levels
may not be reached until near the end of the decade. The largest job losses have
been in Southern California, led by declines in the aerospace and construction
industries. Weakness statewide occurred in manufacturing, construction, services
and trade and will be hurt in the next few years by continued cuts in federal
defense spending and base closures. Unemployment averaged over 9% in 1993 and is
expected to remain high in 1994. The State's economy is only expected to pull
out of the recession slowly, following the the national recovery which has
begun. Delay in recovery will exacerbate shortfalls in State revenues.
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON TAXES AND APPROPRIATIONS
LIMITATION ON TAXES. Certain California municipal obligations may be
obligations of issuers which rely in whole or in part, directly or indirectly,
on AD VALOREM property taxes as a source of revenue. The taxing powers of
California local governments and districts are limited by Article XIIIA of the
California Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1978 and commonly known as
"Proposition 13." Briefly, Article XIIIA limits to 1% of full cash value the
rate of AD VALOREM property taxes on real property and generally restricts the
reassessment of property to 2% per year, except upon new construction or change
of ownership (subject to a number of exemptions). Taxing entities may, however,
raise AD VALOREM taxes above the 1% limit to pay debt service on voter-approved
bonded indebtedness.
Under Article XIIIA, the basic 1% AD VALOREM tax levy is applied against the
assessed value of property as of the owner's date of acquisition (or as of March
1, 1975, if acquired earlier), subject to certain adjustments. This system has
resulted in widely varying amounts of tax on similarly situated properties.
Several lawsuits have been filed challenging the acquisition-based assessment
system of Proposition 13 and on June 18, 1992 the U.S. Supreme Court announced a
decision upholding Proposition 13.
Article XIIIA prohibits local governments from raising revenues through AD
VALOREM property taxes above the 1% limit; it also requires voters of any
governmental unit to give two-thirds approval to levy any "special tax." Court
decisions, however, allowed non-voter approved levy of "general taxes" which
were not dedicated to a specific use. In response to these decisions, the voters
of the State in 1986 adopted an initiative statute which imposed significant new
limits on the ability of local entities to raise or levy general taxes, except
by
11
<PAGE>
receiving majority local voter approval. Significant elements of this
initiative, "Proposition 62," have been overturned in recent court cases. An
initiative proposed to re-enact the provisions of Proposition 62 as a
constitutional amendment was defeated by the voters in November 1990, but such a
proposal may be renewed in the future.
APPROPRIATIONS LIMITS. California and its local governments are subject to
an annual "appropriations limit" imposed by Article XIIIB of the California
Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1979 and significantly amended by
Propositions 98 and 111 in 1988 and 1990, respectively. Article XIIIB prohibits
the State or any covered local government from spending "appropriations subject
to limitation" in excess of the appropriations limit imposed. "Appropriations
subject to limitation" are authorizations to spend "proceeds of taxes," which
consists of tax revenues and certain other funds, including proceeds from
regulatory licenses, user charges or other fees, to the extent that such
proceeds exceed the cost of providing the product or service, but "proceeds of
taxes" excludes most State subventions to local governments. No limit is imposed
on appropriations of funds which are not "proceeds of taxes," such as reasonable
user charges or fees, and certain other non-tax funds, including bond proceeds.
Among the expenditures not included in the Article XIIIB appropriations
limit are (1) the debt service cost of bonds issued or authorized prior to
January 1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, (2) appropriations
arising from certain emergencies declared by the Governor, (3) appropriations
for certain capital outlay projects, (4) appropriations by the State of
post-1989 increases in gasoline taxes and vehicle weight fees, and (5)
appropriations made in certain cases of emergency.
The appropriations limit for each year is adjusted annually to reflect
changes in cost of living and population, and any transfers of service
responsibilities between government units. The definitions for such adjustments
were liberalized in 1990 to follow more closely growth in California's economy.
"Excess" revenues are measured over a two-year cycle. Local governments must
return any excess to taxpayers by rate reduction. The State must refund 50% of
any excess, with the other 50% paid to schools and community colleges. With more
liberal annual adjustment factors since 1988, and depressed revenues since 1990
because of the recession, few governments are currently operating near their
spending limits, but this condition may change over time. Local governments may
by voter approval exceed their spending limits for up to four years.
Because of the complex nature of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB of the California
Constitution, the ambiguities and possible inconsistencies in their terms, and
the impossibility of predicting future appropriations or changes in population
and cost of living, and the probability of continuing legal challenges, it is
not currently possible to determine fully the impact of Article XIIIA or Article
XIIIB on California Municipal Obligations or on the ability of California or
local governments to pay debt service on such California Municipal Obligations.
It is not presently possible to predict the outcome of any pending litigation
with respect to the ultimate scope, impact or constitutionality of either
Article XIIIA or Article XIIIB, or the impact of any such determinations upon
State agencies or local governments, or upon their ability to pay debt service
on their obligations. Future initiatives or legislative changes in laws or the
California Constitution may also affect the ability of the State or local
issuers to repay their obligations.
OBLIGATIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. As of April 1, 1994, California had
approximately $18.1 billion of general obligation bonds outstanding, and $5.6
billion remained authorized
12
<PAGE>
but unissued. In addition, at June 30, 1993, the State had lease-purchase
obligations, payable from the State's General Fund, of approximately $4.0
billion. Four general obligation bond propositions, totalling $5.9 billion, will
be on the June 1994 ballot. In fiscal year 1992-93, debt service on general
obligation bonds and lease-purchase debt was approximately 4.1% of General Fund
revenues. The State has paid the principal of and interest on its general
obligation bonds, lease-purchase debt and short-term obligations when due.
RECENT FINANCIAL RESULTS. The principal sources of General Fund revenues in
1992-93 were the California personal income tax (44% of total revenues), the
sales tax (38%), bank and corporation taxes (12%), and the gross premium tax on
insurance (3%). California maintains a Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties
(the "Economic Uncertainties Fund"), derived from General Fund revenues, as a
reserve to meet cash needs of the General Fund.
GENERAL. Throughout the 1980's, State spending increased rapidly as the
State population and economy also grew rapidly, including increased spending for
many assistance programs to local governments, which were constrained by
Proposition 13 and other laws. The largest State program is assistance to local
public school districts. In 1988, an initiative (Proposition 98) was enacted
which (subject to suspension by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature and the
Governor) guarantees local school districts and community college districts a
minimum share of State General Fund revenues (currently about 34%).
Since the start of 1990-91 Fiscal Year, the State has faced adverse
economic, fiscal, and budget conditions. The economic recession seriously
affected State tax revenues. It also caused increased expenditures for health
and welfare programs. The State is also facing a structural imbalance in its
budget with the largest programs supported by the General Fund (education,
health, welfare and corrections) growing at rates higher than the growth rates
for the principal revenue sources of the General Fund. As a result, the State
entered a period of budget imbalance, with expenditures exceeding revenues for
four of the five fiscal years ending in 1991-92.
As the State fell into a deep recession in the summer of 1990, the State
budget fell sharply out of balance in the 1990-91 and 1991-92 fiscal years,
despite significant expenditure cuts and tax increases. The State had
accumulated a $2.8 billion budget deficit by June 30, 1992. This deficit also
severely reduced the State's cash resources, so that it had to rely on external
borrowing in the short-term markets to meet its cash needs.
1992-93 FISCAL YEAR. With the failure to enact a budget by July 1, 1992,
the State had no legal authority to pay many of its vendors until the budget was
passed; nevertheless, certain obligations (such as debt service, school
apportionments, welfare payments, and employee salaries) were payable because of
continuing or special appropriations, or court orders. However, the State
Controller did not have enough cash to pay as they came due all of these ongoing
obligations, as well as valid obligations incurred in the prior fiscal year.
Because of the delay in enacting the budget, the State could not carry out
its normal cash flow borrowing and, starting on July 1, 1992, the Controller was
required to issue "registered warrants" in lieu of normal warrants backed by
cash to pay many State obligations. Available cash was used to pay
constitutionally mandated and priority obligations. Between July 1 and September
3, 1992, the Controller issued an aggregate of approximately $3.8 billion of
registered warrants, all of which were called for redemption by September 4,
1992 following enactment of the 1992-93 Budget Act and issuance by the State of
$3.3 billion of Interim Notes.
13
<PAGE>
The 1992-93 Budget Act, when finally adopted, was projected to eliminate the
State's accumulated deficit, with additional expenditure cuts and a $1.3 billion
transfer of State education funding costs to local governments by shifting local
property taxes to school districts. However, as the recession continued longer
and deeper than expected, revenues once again were far below projections, and
only reached a level just equal to the amount of expenditures. Thus, the State
continued to carry its $2.8 billion budget deficit at June 30, 1993.
The 1993-94 Budget Act was similar to the prior year, in reliance on
expenditure cuts and an additional $2.6 billion transfer of costs to local
government, particularly counties. A major feature of the budget was a two-year
plan to eliminate the accumulated deficit by borrowing into the 1994-95 fiscal
year. With the recession still continuing longer than expected, the 1994-95
Governor's Budget now projects that in the 1993-94 Fiscal Year, the General Fund
will have $900 million less revenue and $800 million higher expenditures than
budgeted. As a result revenues will only exceed expenditures by about $400
million. If this projection is met, it will be the first operating surplus in
four years; however, some budget analysts outside the Department of Finance
project revenues in the balance of 1993-94 will not even meet the revised, lower
projection. In addition, the General Fund may have some unplanned costs for
relief related to the January 17, 1994 Northridge earthquake.
The State has implemented its short-term borrowing as part of the deficit
elimination plan, and has also borrowed additional sums to cover cash flow
shortfalls in the spring of 1994, for a total of $3.2 billion, coming due in
July and December, 1994. Repayment of these short-term notes will require
additional borrowing, as the State's cash position continues to be adversely
affected.
The Governor's 1994-95 Budget proposal recognizes the need to bridge a gap
of around $5 billion by June 30, 1995. Over $3.1 billion of this amount is being
requested from the federal government as increased aid, particularly for costs
associated with incarcerating, educating and providing health and welfare
services to undocumented immigrants. However, President Clinton has not included
these costs in his proposed Fiscal 1995 Budget. The rest of the budget gap is
proposed to be closed with expenditure cuts and projected $600 million of new
revenue assuming the State wins a tax case presently pending in the U.S. Supreme
Court. Thus the State will once again face significant uncertainties and very
difficult choices in the 1994-95 budget, as tax increases are unlikely and many
cuts and budget adjustments have been made in the past three years.
The State's severe financial difficulties for the current and upcoming
budget years will result in continued pressure upon almost all local
governments, particularly school districts and counties which depend on State
aid. Despite efforts in recent years to increase taxes and reduce governmental
expenditures, there can be no assurance that the State will not face budget gaps
in the future.
BOND RATING. State general obligation bonds are currently rated "Aa" by
Moody's and "A+" by S&P. Both of these ratings were reduced from "AAA" levels
which the State held until late 1991. There can be no assurance that such
ratings will be maintained in the future. It should be noted that the
creditworthiness of obligations issued by local California issuers may be
unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the State of
California, and that there is no obligation on the part of the State to make
payment on such local obligations in the event of default.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. The State is involved in certain legal proceedings
(described in the State's recent financial statements) that, if decided against
the State, may require the State
14
<PAGE>
to make significant future expenditures or may substantially impair revenues.
The U.S. Supreme Court has granted review of two cases challenging California's
"unitary" method of taxing multinational corporations. Although this taxing
method has since been changed, if the State loses these cases, it could be
liable for tax refunds and lost receipts of taxes assessed totalling $3.5
billion to $4 billion.
OBLIGATIONS OF OTHER ISSUERS
OTHER ISSUERS OF CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS. There are a number of
state agencies, instrumentalities and political subdivisions of the State that
issue Municipal Obligations, some of which may be conduit revenue obligations
payable from payments from private borrowers. These entities are subject to
various economic risks and uncertainties, and the credit quality of the
securities issued by them may vary considerably from the credit quality of the
obligations backed by the full faith and credit of the State.
STATE ASSISTANCE. Property tax revenues received by local governments
declined more than 50% following passage of Proposition 13. Subsequently, the
California Legislature enacted measures to provide for the redistribution of the
State's General Fund surplus to local agencies, the reallocation of certain
State revenues to local agencies and the assumption of certain governmental
functions by the State to assist municipal issuers to raise revenues. Total
local assistance (including public schools) accounted for approximately 75% of
General Fund expenditures, including the effect of implementing reductions in
certain aid programs. To reduce State General Fund support for school districts,
the 1992-93 and 1993-94 Budget Acts caused local governments to transfer $3.9
billion of property tax revenues to school districts, representing loss of all
of the post-Proposition 13 "bailout" aid. The largest share of these transfers
came from counties, and the balance from cities, special districts and
redevelopment agencies. In order to make up this shortfall, the Legislature
proposed and voters approved dedicating 0.5% of the sales tax to counties and
cities for public safety purposes. In addition, the Legislature has changed laws
to relieve local governments of certain mandates, allowing them to reduce costs.
To the extent the State should be constrained by its Article XIIIB
appropriations limit, or its obligation to conform to Proposition 98, or other
fiscal considerations, the absolute level, or the rate of growth, of State
assistance to local governments may be reduced. Any such reductions in State aid
could compound the serious fiscal constraints already experienced by many local
governments, particularly counties. The Richmond Unified School District (Contra
Costa County) entered bankruptcy proceedings in May 1991 but the proceedings
have been dismissed.
ASSESSMENT BONDS. California Municipal Obligations which are assessment
bonds may be adversely affected by a general decline in real estate values or a
slowdown in real estate sales activity. In many cases, such bonds are secured by
land which is undeveloped at the time of issuance but anticipated to be
developed within a few years after issuance. In the event of such reduction or
slowdown, such development may not occur or may be delayed, thereby increasing
the risk of a default on the bonds. Because the special assessments or taxes
securing these bonds are not the personal liability of the owners of the
property assessed, the lien on the property is the only security for the bonds.
Moreover, in most cases the issuer of these bonds is not required to make
payments on the bonds in the event of delinquency in the payment of assessments
or taxes, except from amounts, if any, in a reserve fund established for the
bonds.
15
<PAGE>
CALIFORNIA LONG-TERM LEASE OBLIGATIONS. Certain California long-term lease
obligations, though typically payable from the general fund of the municipality,
are subject to "abatement" in the event the facility being leased is unavailable
for beneficial use and occupancy by the municipality during the term of the
lease. Abatement is not a default, and there may be no remedies available to the
holders of the certificates evidencing the lease obligation in the event
abatement occurs. The most common cases of abatement are failure to complete
construction of the facility before the end of the period during which lease
payments have been capitalized and uninsured casualty losses to the facility
(E.G., due to earthquake). In the event abatement occurs with respect to a lease
obligation, lease payments may be interrupted (if all available insurance
proceeds and reserves are exhausted) and the certificates may not be paid when
due.
Several years ago the Richmond Unified School District (the "District")
entered into a lease transaction in which certain existing properties of the
District were sold and leased back in order to obtain funds to cover operating
deficits. Following a fiscal crisis in which the District's finances were taken
over by a State receiver (including a brief period under bankruptcy court
protection), the District failed to make rental payments on this lease,
resulting in a lawsuit by the Trustee for the Certificate of Participation
holders, in which the State was a named defendant (on the grounds that it
controlled the District's finances). One of the defenses raised in answer to
this lawsuit was the invalidity of the District's lease. The trial court has
upheld the validity of the lease and the case has been settled. Any judgment in
a future case against the position asserted by the Trustee in the Richmond case
may have adverse implications for lease transactions of a similar nature by
other California entities.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS. The repayment of industrial development securities
secured by real property may be affected by California laws limiting foreclosure
rights of creditors. Securities backed by health care and hospital revenues may
be affected by changes in State regulations governing cost reimbursements to
health care providers under Medi-Cal (the State's Medicaid program), including
risks related to the policy of awarding exclusive contracts to certain
hospitals.
Limitations on AD VALOREM property taxes may particularly affect "tax
allocation" bonds issued by California redevelopment agencies. Such bonds are
secured solely by the increase in assessed valuation of a redevelopment project
area after the start of redevelopment activity. In the event that assessed
values in the redevelopment project decline (E.G., because of a major natural
disaster such as an earthquake), the tax increment revenue may be insufficient
to make principal and interest payments on these bonds. Both Moody's and S&P
suspended ratings on California tax allocation bonds after the enactment of
Articles XIIIA and XIIIB, and only resumed such ratings on a selective basis.
Proposition 87, approved by California voters in 1988, requires that all
revenues produced by a tax rate increase go directly to the taxing entity which
increased such tax rate to repay that entity's general obligation indebtedness.
As a result, redevelopment agencies (which, typically, are the issuers of tax
allocation securities) no longer receive an increase in tax increment when taxes
on property in the project area are increased to repay voter-approved bonded
indebtedness.
The effect of these various constitutional and statutory changes upon the
ability of California municipal securities issuers to pay interest and principal
on their obligations remains unclear. Furthermore, other measures affecting the
taxing or spending authority of California or its political subdivisions may be
approved or enacted in the future. Legislation has been or may be introduced
which would modify existing taxes or other revenue-raising
16
<PAGE>
measures or which either would further limit or, alternatively, would increase
the abilities of state and local governments to impose new taxes or increase
existing taxes. It is not presently possible to predict the extent to which any
such legislation will be enacted. Nor is it presently possible to determine the
impact of any such legislation on California Municipal Obligations in which the
Fund may invest, future allocations of state revenues to local governments or
the abilities of state or local governments to pay the interest on, or repay the
principal of, such California Municipal Obligations.
Substantially all of California is within an active geologic region subject
to major seismic activity. Any California Municipal Obligation in the California
Insured Trust could be affected by an interruption of revenues because of
damaged facilities, or, consequently, income tax deductions for casualty losses
or property tax assessment reductions. Compensatory financial assistance could
be constrained by the inability of (i) an issuer to have obtained earthquake
insurance coverage at reasonable rates; (ii) an insurer to perform on its
contracts of insurance in the event of widespread losses; or (iii) the Federal
or State government to appropriate sufficient funds within their respective
budget limitations.
On January 17, 1994, a major earthquake with an estimated magnitude of 6.8
on the Richter scale struck the Los Angeles area, causing significant property
damage to public and private facilities, presently estimated at $15-20 billion.
While over $9.5 billion of federal aid, and a projected $1.9 billion of State
aid, plus insurance proceeds, will reimburse much of that loss, there will be
some ultimate loss of wealth and income in the region, in addition to costs of
the disruption caused by the event. Short-term economic projections are
generally neutral, as the infusion of aid will restore billions of dollars to
the local economy within a few months; already the local construction industry
has picked up. Although the earthquake will hinder recovery from the recession
in Southern California, already hard-hit, its long-term impact is not expected
to be material in the context of the overall wealth of the region. Almost five
years after the event, there are few remaining effects of the 1989 Loma Prieta
earthquake in northern California (which, however, caused less severe damage
than Northridge).
17
<PAGE>
CALIFORNIA TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLE
The following tables show the approximate taxable estimated current returns
for individuals that are equivalent to tax-exempt estimated current returns
under combined Federal and state taxes, using published 1994 marginal Federal
tax rates and marginal state tax rates currently available and scheduled to be
in effect. The tables incorporate increased tax rates for higher-income
taxpayers that were included in the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. For
cases in which more than one state bracket falls within a Federal bracket, the
highest state bracket is combined with the Federal bracket. The combined state
and Federal tax brackets shown reflect the fact that state tax payments are
currently deductible for Federal tax purposes. The tables illustrate what you
would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt estimated
current return for your income tax bracket. A taxpayer's marginal tax rate is
affected by both his taxable income and his adjusted gross income. Locate your
adjusted gross and your taxable income (which is your adjusted gross income
reduced by any deductions and exemptions), then locate your tax bracket based on
joint or single tax filing. Read across to the equivalent taxable estimated
current return you would need to match the tax-free income.
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR JOINT TAXPAYERS WITH FOUR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State* and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 38.0 $ 0-111.8 20.0 % 5.94 6.25 6.56 6.88 7.19 7.50 7.81 8.13
38.0- 91.9 0-111.8 34.5 7.25 7.63 8.02 8.40 8.78 9.16 9.54 9.92
111.8-167.7 35.5 7.36 7.75 8.14 8.53 8.91 9.30 9.69 10.08
91.9-140.0 0-111.8 37.5 7.60 8.00 8.40 8.80 9.20 9.60 10.00 10.40
111.8-167.7 38.5 7.72 8.13 8.54 8.94 9.35 9.76 10.16 10.57
167.7-212.4 40.5 7.98 8.40 8.82 9.24 9.66 10.08 10.50 10.92
140.0-212.4 111.8-167.7 43.0 8.33 8.77 9.21 9.65 10.09 10.53 10.96 11.40
167.7-212.4 45.5 8.72 9.17 9.63 10.09 10.55 11.01 11.47 11.93
212.4-237.4 46.5 8.88 9.35 9.81 10.28 10.75 11.21 11.68 12.15
237.4-290.2 46.0 8.80 9.26 9.72 10.19 10.65 11.11 11.57 12.04
Over 290.2 43.5 2 8.41 8.85 9.29 9.73 10.18 10.62 11.06 11.50
212.4-250.0 167.7-212.4 46.0 8.80 9.26 9.72 10.19 10.65 11.11 11.57 12.04
212.4-237.4 47.0 8.96 9.43 9.91 10.38 10.85 11.32 11.79 12.26
237.4-290.2 46.5 8.88 9.35 9.81 10.28 10.75 11.21 11.68 12.15
Over 290.2 44.0 2 8.48 8.93 9.38 9.82 10.27 10.71 11.16 11.61
250.0-424.8 237.4-290.2 50.0 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00
Over 290.2 47.0 3 8.96 9.43 9.91 10.38 10.85 11.32 11.79 12.26
Over 424.8 Over 290.2 47.5 3 9.05 9.52 10.00 10.48 10.95 11.43 11.90 12.38
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE>
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR SINGLE TAXPAYERS WITH ONE PERSONAL EXEMPTION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State* and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 22.8 $ 0-106.2 20.0 % 5.94 6.25 6.56 6.88 7.19 7.50 7.81 8.13
22.8- 55.1 0-106.2 34.5 7.25 7.63 8.02 8.40 8.78 9.16 9.54 9.92
55.1-106.2 0-106.2 37.5 7.60 8.00 8.40 8.80 9.20 9.60 10.00 10.40
106.2-111.8 38.0 7.66 8.06 8.47 8.87 9.27 9.68 10.08 10.48
111.8-131.2 39.5 7.85 8.26 8.68 9.09 9.50 9.92 10.33 10.74
131.2-234.3 39.0 7.79 8.20 8.61 9.02 9.43 9.84 10.25 10.66
106.2-115.0 0-106.2 38.0 7.66 8.06 8.47 8.87 9.27 9.68 10.08 10.48
106.2-111.8 38.5 7.72 8.13 8.54 8.94 9.35 9.76 10.16 10.57
111.8-131.2 40.0 7.92 8.33 8.75 9.17 9.58 10.00 10.42 10.83
131.2-234.3 39.5 7.85 8.26 8.68 9.09 9.50 9.92 10.33 10.74
115.0-212.4 111.8-131.2 44.5 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
131.2-234.3 44.5 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
Over 234.3 44.0 2 8.48 8.93 9.38 9.82 10.27 10.71 11.16 11.61
212.4-250.0 131.2-234.3 45.0 8.64 9.09 9.55 10.00 10.45 10.91 11.36 11.82
Over 234.3 44.5 2 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
Over 250.0 Over 234.3 47.5 3 9.05 9.52 10.00 10.48 10.95 11.43 11.90 12.38
<FN>
- ------------------
* The State tax rates assumed take into account the adjustment of tax brackets based on changes in the Consumer Price Index
for 1993.
1 The table reflects the effect of the limitations on itemized deductions and the deduction for personal exemptions. They
were designed to phase out certain benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers. These limitations, in effect, raise
the current maximum marginal Federal tax rate to approximately 44.0 percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to
four personal exemptions and to approximately 41.0 percent for taxpayers filing a single return entitled to only one personal
exemption. These limitations are subject to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed and the total
amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to
lose more than 80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions. The table also reflects California income tax
laws that increase state income tax rates for high income taxpayers, limit itemized deductions and phase out the benefit of the
personal exemption credit and the dependent exemption credit in a manner similar to Federal tax law.
2 Federal tax rate reverts to 36.0% and the state tax rate reverts to the applicable stated maximum rate after the 80% cap
on the limitation on itemized deductions, under federal or state law, as appropriate has been met.
3 Federal tax rate reverts to 39.6% after the 80% cap on the limitation on itemized deductions has been met.
</TABLE>
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns
with the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trust and returns over specified periods on other similar Nuveen Trusts with
returns on taxable investments such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank
CD's and money market accounts or money market funds, each of which has
investment characteristics that may differ from those of the Trust. U.S.
Government bonds, for example, are backed by the full faith and credit of the
U.S. Government and bank CD's and money market accounts are insured by an agency
of the federal government. Money market accounts and money market funds provide
stability of principal, but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition
of the short-term debt market. The investment characteristics of the Trust are
described more fully elsewhere in this Prospectus.
19
<PAGE>
Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust
Schedule of Investments at Date of Deposit
July 14, 1994
CALIFORNIA INSURED TRUST 228
(Series 739)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ratings(3) Trustee's
Optional --------------------- Determination
Aggregate Name of Issuer and Title of Issue Represented Redemption Standard of Offering
Principal by Sponsor's Contracts to Purchase Bonds(1) Provisions(2) & Poor's Moody's Price(4)
<C> <C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 500,000 State Public Works Board of the State of 2002 at 102 AAA Aaa $ 434,925
California, Lease Revenue Bonds (Department
of Corrections), 1993 Series D (California
State Prison-Lassen County, Susanville),
5.375% Due 6/1/18.
500,000 California Statewide Communities Development 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 440,905
Authority, Certificates of Participation,
Sutter Health Obligated Group, 5.50% Due
8/15/23.
500,000 City of Fresno, California, Health Facility 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 455,155
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Holy Cross Health
System Corporation), Series 1993, 5.625% Due
12/1/15.
500,000 City of Industry, California, General 2003 at 101 7/8 AAA Aaa 460,245
Obligation Refunding Bonds, Issue of 1993,
5.70% Due 7/1/18.
500,000 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa 497,500
California, Water Works Revenue Bonds, 6.375%
Due 7/1/34.
500,000 City of Los Angeles, California, Wastewater 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa 468,330
System Revenue Bonds, Series 1994-A, 5.875%
Due 6/1/24.
500,000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement 2004 at 101 1/2 AAA Aaa 514,650
Bonds of 1994 (General Obligation Bonds),
6.50% Due 7/1/23.
- ----------- ---------------
$ 3,500,000 $ 3,271,710
- ----------- ---------------
- ----------- ---------------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Schedules of Investments, page 49.
20
<PAGE>
MASSACHUSETTS INSURED TRUST 115
The Portfolio of Massachusetts Insured Trust 115 consists of 7 obligations
issued by entities located in Massachusetts and one obligation issued by an
entity located in the Territory of Puerto Rico. Two Bonds in the Trust are
general obligations of the governmental entities issuing them and are backed by
the taxing powers thereof. Six Bonds in the Trust are payable as to principal
and interest from the income of a specific project or authority and are not
supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. The sources of payment for these
Bonds are divided as follows: College and University Revenue, 2; Electrical
System Revenue, 1; Health Care Facility Revenue, 2; Transportation Facility
Revenue, 1. All of the Bonds in the Trust, as insured, are rated AAA by Standard
& Poor's Corporation and Aaa by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
At the Date of Deposit, the average maturity of the Bonds in the
Massachusetts Insured Trust is 23.9 years. The average maturity of the Bonds in
a Trust is calculated based upon the stated maturities of the Bonds in such
Trust (or, with respect to Bonds for which funds or securities have been placed
in escrow to redeem such Bonds on a stated call date, based upon such call
date). The average maturity of the Bonds in a Trust may increase or decrease
from time to time as Bonds mature or are called or sold.
Approximately 14.3% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds in the
Trust (accounting for approximately 13.3% of the aggregate offering price of the
Bonds) are original issue discount bonds. See "GENERAL TRUST
INFORMATION--ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT BONDS AND STRIPPED OBLIGATIONS" for a
discussion of the characteristics of such bonds and of the risks associated
therewith.
Approximately 27% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds in the
Trust consists of obligations of issuers whose revenues are primarily derived
from payments to colleges and universities, including tuition, dormitory
revenues, grants and endorsements.
Approximately 29% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds in the
Trust consists of obligations of issuers whose revenues are primarily derived
from services provided by hospitals or other health care facilities.
For a discussion of the risks associated with investments in the bonds of
various issuers, see "General Trust Information" in this section.
The Sponsor entered into contracts to acquire the Bonds between July 12,
1994 and July 13, 1994. The following summarizes certain information about the
Bonds as of the business day prior to the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Difference between Trustee's
Determination of Offering Price and
Cost to Profit (or loss) Annual Interest Bid Price the Bid Price
Sponsor to Sponsor Income to Trust of Bonds (as % of principal amount)
---------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------- -----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$3,309,552 $13,239 $207,694 $3,305,866 .48%
</TABLE>
Neither cost to Sponsor nor profit (or loss) to Sponsor reflects
underwriting profits or losses received or incurred by the Sponsor through its
participation in underwriting syndicates. An underwriter or underwriting
syndicate purchases bonds from the issuer on a negotiated or competitive bid
basis as principal with the motive of marketing such bonds to investors at a
profit. The Sponsor did not participate as either the sole underwriter or as a
manager or member of a syndicate that acted as the original underwriter of any
of the Bonds.
Unitholders may elect to have interest distributions made on a monthly,
quarterly or semi-annual basis. The interest on the Bonds initially deposited in
the Massachusetts Insured Trust, less estimated expenses, is estimated to accrue
at the rate of $.01594 per
21
<PAGE>
Unit per day under the semi-annual plan of distribution, $.01589 per Unit per
day under the quarterly plan of distribution and $.01580 per Unit per day under
the monthly plan of distribution. It is anticipated that the amount of interest
to be distributed per Unit in each year under each plan of distribution will
initially be substantially equal to the Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per
Unit for that plan.
Details of interest distributions per Unit of the Massachusetts Insured
Trust under the various plans appear in the following table based upon estimated
Net Annual Interest Income at the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Normal
Distributions
Massachusetts Insured Trust 1994 1995 per Year
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
Record Date*.......................... 8/1 11/1 2/1 5/1
Distribution Date..................... 8/15 11/15 2/15 5/15
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly Distribution Plan............. $ .2694(1) $ 5.7061
-------- $.4755 every month --------
Quarterly Distribution Plan........... $ .2694(1) $ 1.4337(2) $ 1.4337 $ 1.4337 $ 5.7381
Semi-Annual Distribution Plan......... $ .2694(1) $ 1.4391(3) $ 2.8782 $ 5.7571
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
* Record Dates for semi-annual distributions are May 1 and November 1; for quarterly distributions, they are February 1, May 1,
August 1 and November 1. Record Dates for monthly distributions are the first day of each month.
(1) The first distribution will be paid to all Unitholders, regardless of the distribution plan selected. Such distribution may
be more or less than a regular monthly distribution.
(2) Regular 3-month distribution.
(3) The second distribution under the semi-annual distribution plan represents a 3-month distribution; subsequent semi-annual
distributions will be regular 6-month distributions.
</TABLE>
The accrual amounts set forth above, and in turn the amount of interest to
be distributed annually per Unit, will generally change as Bonds are redeemed,
mature or are sold or as fees and expenses increase or decrease.
TAX STATUS--MASSACHUSETTS INSURED TRUST
For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on Massachusetts
Insured Trust Units, see Section 11.
In the opinion of Edwards & Angell, special Massachusetts counsel to the
Trust, based on rulings by the Commissioner of Revenue and under existing law:
For Massachusetts income tax purposes, each Trust will be treated as a
corporate trust under Section 8 of Chapter 62 of the Massachusetts General
Laws ("M.G.L.") and not as a grantor trust under Section 10(e) of M.G.L.
Chapter 62.
The Trust will not be held to be engaging in business in Massachusetts
within the meaning of said Section 8 and will, therefore, not be subject to
Massachusetts income tax.
Unitholders who are subject to Massachusetts income taxation under
M.G.L. Chapter 62 will not be required to include their respective shares of
the earnings of or distributions from the Massachusetts Insured Trust in
their Massachusetts gross income to the extent that such earnings or
distributions represent tax-exempt interest excludable from gross income for
Federal income tax purposes received by the Massachusetts Insured Trust on
obligations issued by Massachusetts, its counties, municipalities,
authorities, political subdivisions or instrumentalities or by Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands or other possessions
of the United States within the meaning of Section 103(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Massachusetts Obligations").
22
<PAGE>
In the case of a Massachusetts Insured Trust, Unitholders who are
subject to Massachusetts income taxation under M.G.L. Chapter 62 will not be
required to include their respective shares of the earnings of or
distributions from such Trust in their Massachusetts gross income to the
extent that such earnings or distributions are derived from the proceeds of
insurance obtained by the Sponsor of such Trust or by the issuer or
underwriter of an obligation held by such Trust that represent maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee, if and to the same
extent that such earnings or distributions would have been excludable from
the gross income of such Unitholders if derived from interest paid by the
issuer of the defaulted obligation.
Unitholders which are corporations subject to taxation under M.G.L.
Chapter 63 will be required to include their respective shares of the
earnings of or distributions from the Trust in their Massachusetts gross
income to the extent that such earnings or distributions represent interest
from bonds, notes or indebtedness of any state, including Massachusetts,
except for interest which is specifically exempted from such tax by the acts
authorizing issuance of said Massachusetts Obligations.
The Massachusetts Insured Trust's capital gains and/or capital losses
which are includable in the Federal gross income of Unitholders who are
subject to Massachusetts income taxation under M.G.L. Chapter 62, or
Unitholders which are corporations subject to Massachusetts taxation under
M.G.L. Chapter 63 will be included as capital gains and/or losses in the
Unitholders' Massachusetts gross income, except for capital gain which is
specifically exempted from taxation under such Chapters by the acts
authorizing issuance of said Massachusetts Obligations.
Unitholders which are corporations subject to tax under M.G.L. Chapter
63 and which are tangible property corporations will not be required to
include the Units when determining the value of their tangible property.
Unitholders which are intangible property corporations will be required to
include the Units when determining their net worth.
Gains or losses realized on sales or redemptions of Units by Unitholders
who are subject to Massachusetts income taxation under M.G.L. Chapter 62, or
Unitholders which are corporations subject to Massachusetts income taxation
under M.G.L. Chapter 63, will be includable in their Massachusetts gross
income. In determining such gain or loss Unitholders will, to the same
extent required for Federal tax purposes, have to adjust their tax bases for
their Units for accrued interest received, if any, on Massachusetts
Obligations delivered to the Trustee after the Unitholders pay for their
Units, for amortization of premiums, if any, on Massachusetts Obligations
held by the Massachusetts Insured Trust, and for accrued original issue
discount with respect to each Massachusetts Obligation which, at the time
the Massachusetts Obligation was issued, had original issue discount.
The Units of the Trust are not subject to any property tax levied by
Massachusetts or any political subdivision thereof, nor to any income tax
levied by any such political subdivision. They are includable in the gross
estate of a deceased holder who is a resident of Massachusetts for purposes
of the Massachusetts Estate Tax.
ECONOMIC FACTORS--MASSACHUSETTS
Without intending to be complete, the following briefly summarizes the
current financial situation, as well as some of the complex factors affecting
the financial situation, in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (the
"COMMONWEALTH"). It is derived from sources that are generally available to
investors and is based in part on information obtained from
23
<PAGE>
various agencies in Massachusetts. No independent verification has been made of
the accuracy or completeness of the following information.
There can be no assurance that current or future statewide or regional
economic difficulties, and the resulting impact on Commonwealth or local
governmental finances generally, will not adversely affect the market value of
Massachusetts Obligations in the Trust or the ability of particular obligors to
make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those obligations.
Since 1988, there has been a significant slowdown in the Commonwealth's
economy, as indicated by a rise in unemployment, a slowing of its per capita
income growth and declining state revenues. In fiscal 1991, the Commonwealth's
expenditures for state government programs exceeded current revenues, and
although fiscal 1992 revenues exceeded expenditures, no assurance can be given
that lower than expected tax revenues will not resume and continue.
1993 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET. On July 20, 1992 the Governor signed the
Commonwealth's budget for fiscal 1993. This budget is based on estimated
budgeted revenue and other sources of $14.641 billion, including current tax
revenue estimates of $9.940 billion. Based on December 31, 1992 tax collections,
tax revenues for the fiscal 1993 budget were revised upwards on January 27, 1993
from the original consensus tax estimate of $9.685 billion. Estimated tax
revenues for fiscal 1993 are approximately $456.4 million greater than tax
revenues for fiscal 1992. As modified by legislation enacted since July 20,
1992, the fiscal 1993 budget provides for estimated budgeted expenditures and
other uses of $14.976 billion, which equals the sum of projected revenues and
other sources plus approximately $319.4 million of the estimated $549.4 million
positive budgetary fund balances existing as of the close of fiscal 1992. The
projected fiscal 1993 budgeted expenditures and other uses represents an
increase of 11.6% from fiscal 1992. The fiscal 1993 budget remains subject to
certain of the Governor's line-item vetoes, which may be overridden by the
legislature.
With regard to revenues, the fiscal 1993 budget depends on certain non-tax
revenue sources, the availability of which is subject to certain contingencies.
The fiscal 1993 budget assumes continued federal reimbursements related to
uncompensated care payments, which is expected to be approximately $212.7
million in fiscal 1993.
The fiscal 1993 budget also assumes that the sale of certain assets will
generate approximately $45.0 million in non-tax revenues, however, there are
currently no agreements to sell such assets and the market for some or all of
such assets in unfavorable. The fiscal 1993 budget also assumes receipt of
approximately $80.0 million from the Massachusetts Water Resource Authority
("MWRA") under an arrangement which would, among other things, relieve the MWRA
of certain comparable future financial commitments to the Commonwealth.
1992 FISCAL YEAR. The Commonwealth's budgeted expenditures and other uses
were approximately $13.420 billion in fiscal 1992, which is $238.7 million or
1.7% lower than fiscal 1991 budgeted expenditures. Final fiscal 1992 budgeted
expenditures were $300 million more than the initial July 1991 estimates of
budgetary expenditures, due in part to increases in certain human services
programs, including an increase of $268.7 million for the Medicaid program and
$50.0 million for mental retardation consent decree requirements. Budgeted
revenues and other sources for fiscal 1992 totaled approximately $13.728 billion
(including tax revenues of $9.484 billion), reflecting an increase of
approximately 0.7% from fiscal 1991 to 1992 and an increase of 5.4% in tax
revenues for the same period. Overall, fiscal 1992 is estimated to have ended
with an excess of revenues and other sources over expenditures and other uses of
$312.3 million. After payment in full of the quarterly
24
<PAGE>
distribution of local aid to the Commonwealth's cities and towns ("LOCAL AID")
in the amount of $514.0 million due on June 30, 1992, retirement of the
Commonwealth's outstanding commercial paper (except for approximately $50
million of bond anticipation notes) and certain other short term borrowings, as
of June 30, 1992, the end of fiscal 1992, the Commonwealth showed a year-end
cash position of approximately $731 million, as compared with the Commonwealth's
cash balance of $182.3 million at the end of fiscal 1991.
1991 FISCAL YEAR. Budgeted expenditures for fiscal 1991 were approximately
$13.659 billion, as against budgeted revenues and other sources of approximately
$13.634 billion. The Commonwealth suffered an operating loss of approximately
$21.2 million. Application of the adjusted fiscal 1990 fund balances of $258.3
resulted in a fiscal 1991 budgetary surplus of $237.1 million. State law
requires that approximately $59.2 million of the fiscal year ending balances of
$237.1 million be placed in the Stabilization Fund, a reserve from which funds
can be appropriated (i) to make up any difference between actual state revenues
in any fiscal year in which actual revenues fall below the allowable amount,
(ii) to replace state and local losses by federal funds or (iii) for any event,
as determined by the legislature, which threatens the health, safety or welfare
of the people or the fiscal stability of the Commonwealth or any of its
political subdivisions.
Upon taking office in January 1991, the new Governor proposed a series of
legislative and administrative actions, including withholding of allotments
under Section 9C of Chapter 29 of the General Laws, intended to eliminate the
projected deficits. The new Governor's review of the Commonwealth's budget
indicated projected spending of $14.105 billion with an estimated $850 million
in budget balancing measures that would be needed prior to the close of fiscal
1991. At that time, estimated tax revenues were revised to $8.845 billion, $903
million less than was estimated at the time the fiscal 1991 budget was adopted.
The Legislature adopted a number of the Governor's recommendations and the
Governor took certain administrative actions not requiring legislative approval,
including the adoption of a state employee furlough program. It is estimated by
the Commonwealth that spending reductions achieved through savings initiatives
and withholding of allotments total approximately $484.3 million in aggregate
for fiscal 1991. However, these savings and reductions may be impacted
negatively by litigation pursued by third parties concerning the Governor's
action under Section 9C of Chapter 29 of the General Laws and with regard to the
state employee furlough program.
In addition, the new administration in May 1991 filed an amendment to its
Medicaid state plan that enables it to claim 50% federal reimbursement on
uncompensated care payments for certain hospitals in the Commonwealth. As a
result, in fiscal 1991 the Commonwealth obtained additional non-tax revenues in
the form of federal reimbursements equal to approximately $513 million on
account of uncompensated care payments. This reimbursement claim was based upon
recent amendments of federal law contained in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act of 1990 and, consequently, on relatively undeveloped federal laws,
regulations and guidelines. At the request of the federal Health Care Financing
Administration, the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department
of Health and Human Services has commenced an audit of the reimbursement. The
administration, which had reviewed the matter with the Health Care Financing
Administration prior to claiming the reimbursement, believes that the
Commonwealth will prevail in the audit. If the Commonwealth does not prevail,
the Commonwealth would have the right to contest an appeal, but could be
required to pay all or part of Medicaid reimbursements with interest and to have
such amount deducted from future reimbursement payments.
1990, 1989 AND 1988 FISCAL YEARS. In July 1989, the former Governor vetoed
certain provisions included in the budget legislation for fiscal 1990, including
approximately $273
25
<PAGE>
million of the fiscal 1990 appropriations, including $100 million for Local Aid.
One of the Governor's vetoes occasioned a default by the Commonwealth on a
September 1, 1989 payment of $2.5 million on a general obligation contract with
the Massachusetts Community Development Finance Corporation to which its full
faith and credit had been pledged, which payment was made on September 17, 1990
after a supplemental appropriation was proposed by the Governor and passed by
the legislature. The legislature overrode the Governor's veto of $100 million of
Local Aid and the Governor then indicated that he was withholding the allotment
for such expenditure. The Supreme Judicial Court invalidated the Governor's
withholding of $210 million of appropriated funds for certain Local Aid purposes
in May 1990.
Budgeted expenditures for fiscal 1988, 1989 and 1990 totaled approximately
$11.6 billion, $12.6 billion and $13.3 billion, respectively. Budgeted revenues
for fiscal 1988, 1989 and 1990 totaled approximately $11.3 billion, $12.0
billion and $12.0 billion, respectively.
EMPLOYMENT. Reversing a trend of relatively low unemployment during the
early and mid 1980s, the Massachusetts unemployment rate has increased
significantly during the last three years to where the Commonwealth's
unemployment rate exceeds the national unemployment rate. In 1989, the average
Massachusetts unemployment rate was 4.0%, representing an 0.8% increase over the
average 1987 unemployment rate, while the average United States unemployment
rate was 5.3%, representing a 0.9% decrease over the average 1987 United States
unemployment rate. During 1990, the Massachusetts unemployment rate increased
from 4.5% in January to 6.1% in July to 6.7% in August. During 1991, the
Massachusetts unemployment rate averaged 9.0% while the average United States
unemployment rate was 6.7%. The Massachusetts unemployment rate in October 1992
was 8.4%, down from 8.6% for September 1992. Other factors which may
significantly and adversely affect the employment rate in the Commonwealth
include the recently announced proposal by the Clinton Administration to close
United States military bases and reduce federal government spending on
defense-related industries. Due to this and other considerations, there can be
no assurances that unemployment in the commonwealth will not increase in the
future.
DEBT RATINGS. S&P currently rates the Commonwealth's uninsured general
obligation bonds at A, having upgraded the rating from BBB on September 9, 1992.
At the same time, S&P upgraded the rating of state and agency notes from SP2 to
SP1. In raising the ratings, S&P cited the Commonwealth's improved financial
status as key to the upgrade. Prior to these actions by S&P, the Commonwealth
had experienced a steady decline in its S&P rating, with its most recent decline
beginning in May 1989, when S&P lowered its rating on the Commonwealth's general
obligation bonds and other Commonwealth obligations from AA+ to AA and
continuing a series of further reductions until March 1992, when the rating was
affirmed at BBB.
Moody's currently rates the Commonwealth's uninsured general obligation
bonds at A, having upgrade the rating from Baa on September 9, 1992. Moody's, in
raising the rating on the bonds, pointed to the Commonwealth's application of
conservative revenue assumptions and efforts to impose spending discipline as
having reduced the state's financial vulnerability and restored fiscal control.
Prior to this increase, the Commonwealth had experienced a steady decline in its
rating by Moody's since May 1989. In May 1989, Moody's lowered its rating on the
Commonwealth's notes from MIG-1 to MIG-2, and its rating on the Commonwealth's
commercial paper from P-1 to P-2. On June 21, 1989 Moody's reduced the
Commonwealth's general obligation rating from Aa to A. On November 15, 1989,
Moody's reduced the rating on the Commonwealth's general obligations from A to
Baa1, citing the Commonwealth's lowering of revenue estimates, its fiscal year
1990 deficit and to the legislature's apparent lack of consensus on how to deal
with it. On March 9, 1990, Moody's reduced the
26
<PAGE>
rating of the Commonwealth's general obligation bonds from Baa1 to Baa, citing
"extended inaction" in resolving the Commonwealth's growing budget deficit.
There can be no assurance that these ratings will continue.
In recent years, the Commonwealth and certain of its public bodies and
municipalities have faced serious financial difficulties which have affected the
credit standing and borrowing abilities of Massachusetts and its respective
entities and may have contributed to higher interest rates on debt obligations.
The continuation of, or an increase in, such financial difficulties could result
in declines in the market values of, or default on, existing obligations
including Massachusetts Obligations in the Trust. Should there be during the
term of the Trust a financial crisis relating to Massachusetts, its public
bodies or municipalities, the market value and marketability of all outstanding
bonds issued by the Commonwealth and its public authorities or municipalities
including the Massachusetts Obligations in the Trust and interest income to the
Trust could be adversely affected.
TOTAL BOND AND NOTE LIABILITIES. The total general obligation bond
indebtedness of the Commonwealth as of January 1, 1993 was approximately $7.9
billion. There were also outstanding approximately $339 million in general
obligation notes and other short term general obligation debt. The total bond
and note liabilities of the Commonwealth as of January 1, 1993, including
guaranteed bond and contingent liabilities, was approximately $12.4 billion.
DEBT SERVICE. During the 1980s, capital expenditures were increased
substantially, which has had a short term impact on the cash needs of the
Commonwealth and also accounts for a significant rise in debt service during
that period. Payments for debt service on Commonwealth general obligation bonds
and notes have risen at an average annual rate of 18.7% from $563.7 million in
fiscal 1988 to an estimated $942.3 million in fiscal 1991. Debt service payments
in fiscal 1992 were $898.3 million. Debt service payments for fiscal 1992
reflect a $261 million one-time reduction achieved as a result of the issuance
of the refunding bonds in September and October 1991. Debt service expenditures
are projected to be $1.195 billion for fiscal 1993 and $1.311 billion for fiscal
1994. The amounts represented do not include debt service on notes issued to
finance the fiscal 1989 deficit and certain Medicaid related liabilities,
certain debt service contract assistance to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation
Authority, the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority and the Massachusetts
Government Land Bank, as well as grants to municipalities under the school
building assistance program to defray a portion of the debt service costs on
local school bonds.
In January 1990, legislation was passed to impose a limit on debt service
beginning in fiscal 1991, providing that no more than 10% of the total
appropriations in any fiscal year may be expended for payment of interest and
principal on general obligation debt (excluding the Fiscal Recovery Bonds). The
percentage of total appropriations expended from the budgeted operating funds
for debt service (excluding debt service on Fiscal Recovery Bonds) for fiscal
1992 is 4.9% which is projected to increase to 6.1% in fiscal 1993.
CERTAIN LIABILITIES. Among the material future liabilities of the
Commonwealth are significant unfunded general liabilities of its retirement
systems and a program to fund such liabilities; a program whereby, starting in
1978, the Commonwealth began assuming full financial responsibility for all
costs of the administration of justice within the Commonwealth; continuing
demands to raise aggregate aid to cities, towns, schools and other districts and
transit authorities above current levels; and Medicaid expenditures which have
increased each year since the program was initiated. The Commonwealth has signed
consent decrees to continue improving mental health care and programs for the
mentally retarded in
27
<PAGE>
order to meet federal standards, including those governing receipt of federal
reimbursements under various programs, and the parties in those cases have
worked cooperatively to resolve the disputed issues.
As a result of comprehensive legislation approved in January, 1988, the
Commonwealth is required, beginning in fiscal 1989 to fund future pension
liabilities currently and to amortize the Commonwealth's unfunded liabilities
over 40 years. Total pension costs increased at an average annual rate of 5.8%
from $600.2 million in fiscal 1988 to $751.5 million in fiscal 1992. The
estimated pension costs (inclusive of current benefits and pension reserves) for
fiscal year 1993 are $873.8 million, representing an increase of 16.2% over
fiscal 1992 expenditures.
LITIGATION. The Commonwealth is engaged in various lawsuits involving
environmental and related laws, including an action brought on behalf of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency alleging violations of the Clean Water Act
and seeking to enforce the clean-up of Boston Harbor. The MWRA, successor in
liability to the Metropolitan District Commission, has assumed primary
responsibility for developing and implementing a court-approved plan for the
construction of the treatment facilities necessary to achieve compliance with
federal requirements. Under the Clean Water Act, the Commonwealth may be liable
for costs of compliance in these or any other Clean Water cases if the MWRA or a
municipality is prevented from raising revenues necessary to comply with a
judgment. The MWRA currently projects that the total cost of construction of the
treatment facilities required under the court's order is approximately $3.5
billion in current dollars.
The Massachusetts Hospital Association has brought an action challenging an
element of the Medicaid rate-setting methodologies for hospitals. If the
plaintiff hospitals are successful, the Commonwealth may face additional
liabilities on the order of $70 million to $100 million. The parties have
recently agreed to a process of settlement and payment of fiscal 1988 through
1991 claims, with payment to be made in fiscal 1993.
There are also actions pending in which recipients of human services
benefits, such as welfare recipients, the mentally retarded, the elderly, the
handicapped, children, residents of state hospitals and inmates of corrections
institutions, seek expanded levels of services and benefits and in which
providers of services to such recipients challenge the rates at which they are
reimbursed by the Commonwealth. To the extent that such actions result in
judgments requiring the Commonwealth to provide expanded services or benefits or
pay increased rates, additional operating and capital expenditures might be
needed to implement such judgments.
In December, 1988, nine municipalities of the Commonwealth which claim to
own substantial interests in a nuclear power plant in Seabrook, New Hampshire,
filed suit against the Commonwealth, the Governor, the Attorney General and
other state officials claiming damages arising from their opposition to
licensure of the plant. The municipalities allege damages in the amount of $1
billion. The Commonwealth's motion to dismiss was allowed, but the plaintiffs in
that case have appealed and the case is under advisement in the Appeals Court.
In addition there are several tax matters in litigation which could result
in significant refunds to taxpayers if decisions unfavorable to the Commonwealth
are rendered. The amount of taxes and interest at issue in those cases is
approximately $195 million.
A variety of other civil suits pending against the Commonwealth may also
affect its future liabilities. These include challenges to the Commonwealth's
allocation of school aid under Section 9C of Chapter 29 of the General Laws and
to adopt a state employee furlough program. No prediction is possible as to the
ultimate outcome of these proceedings.
28
<PAGE>
Many factors, in addition to those cited above, do or may have a bearing
upon the financial condition of the Commonwealth, including social and economic
conditions, many of which are not within the control of the Commonwealth.
EXPENDITURE AND TAX LIMITATION MEASURES. Limits have been established on
state tax revenues by legislation approved by the Governor on October 25, 1986
and by an initiative petition approved by the voters on November 4, 1986. The
Executive Office for Administration and Finance currently estimates that state
tax revenues will not reach the limit imposed by either the initiative petition
or the legislative enactment in fiscal 1992.
Proposition 2 1/2, passed by the voters in 1980, led to large reductions in
property taxes, the major source of income for cities and towns, and large
increases in state aid to offset such revenue losses. According to the Executive
Office for Administration and Finance, all of the 351 cities and towns have now
achieved a property tax level of no more than 2.5% of full property values.
Under the terms of Proposition 2 1/2, the property tax levy can now be increased
annually for all cities and towns, almost all by 2.5% of the prior fiscal year's
tax levy plus 2.5% of the value of new properties and of significant
improvements to property. Legislation has also been enacted providing for
certain local option taxes. A voter initiative petition approved at the
statewide general election in November, 1990 further regulates the distribution
of Local Aid of no less than 40% of collections from individual income taxes,
sales and use taxes, corporate excise taxes, and the balance of the state
lottery fund. If implemented in accordance with its terms (including
appropriation of the necessary funds), the petition as approved would shift
several hundred million dollars to direct Local Aid.
OTHER TAX MEASURES. To provide revenue to pay debt service on both the
deficit and Medicaid-related borrowings and to fund certain direct Medicaid
expenditures, legislation was enacted imposing an additional tax on certain
types of personal income for 1989 and 1990 taxable years at rates of 0.375% and
0.75% respectively, effectively raising the tax rate of 1989 from 5% to 5.375%
and for 1990 to 5.75%. Recent legislation has effectively further increased tax
rates to 5.95% for tax year 1990 to 6.25% for tax year 1991 and returning to
5.95% for tax year 1992 and subsequent tax years. The tax is applicable to all
personal income except income derived from dividends, capital gains,
unemployment compensation, alimony, rent, interest, pensions, annuities and
IRA/Keogh distributions. The income tax rate on other interest (excluding
interest on obligations of the United States and of the Commonwealth and its
subdivisions), dividends and net capital gains (after a 50% reduction) was
increased from 10% to 12% for tax year 1990 and subsequent years, by recently
enacted legislation.
OTHER ISSUERS OF MASSACHUSETTS OBLIGATIONS. There are a number of state
agencies, instrumentatlities and political subdivisions of the Commonwealth that
issue Municipal Obligations, some of which may be conduit revenue obligations
payable from payments from private borrowers. These entities are subject to
various economic risks and uncertainties, and the credit quality of the
securities issued by them may vary considerably from the credit quality of
obligations backed by the full faith and credit of the Commonwealth. The brief
summary above does not address, nor does it attempt to address, any difficulties
and the financial situations of those other issuers of Massachusetts
Obligations.
MASSACHUSETTS TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLE
The following tables show the approximate taxable estimated current returns
for individuals that are equivalent to tax-exempt estimated current returns
under combined Federal and state taxes, using published 1994 marginal Federal
tax rates and marginal state tax rates currently available and scheduled to be
in effect. The tables incorporate increased tax rates for higher-income
taxpayers that were included in the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. For
cases in which more than one state bracket falls within a Federal bracket, the
29
<PAGE>
highest state bracket is combined with the Federal bracket. The combined state
and Federal tax brackets shown reflect the fact that state tax payments are
currently deductible for Federal tax purposes. The tables illustrate what you
would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt estimated
current return for your income tax bracket. A taxpayer's marginal tax rate is
affected by both his taxable income and his adjusted gross income. Locate your
adjusted gross and your taxable income (which is your adjusted gross income
reduced by any deductions and exemptions), then locate your tax bracket based on
joint or single tax filing. Read across to the equivalent taxable estimated
current return you would need to match the tax-free income.
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR JOINT TAXPAYERS WITH FOUR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 38.0 $ 0-111.8 25.0 % 6.33 6.67 7.00 7.33 7.67 8.00 8.33 8.67
38.0- 91.9 0-111.8 36.5 7.48 7.87 8.27 8.66 9.06 9.45 9.84 10.24
111.8-167.7 37.5 7.60 8.00 8.40 8.80 9.20 9.60 10.00 10.40
91.9-140.0 0-111.8 39.5 7.85 8.26 8.68 9.09 9.50 9.92 10.33 10.74
111.8-167.7 40.0 7.92 8.33 8.75 9.17 9.58 10.00 10.42 10.83
167.7-290.2 42.0 8.19 8.62 9.05 9.48 9.91 10.34 10.78 11.21
140.0-250.0 111.8-167.7 44.5 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
167.7-290.2 47.0 8.96 9.43 9.91 10.38 10.85 11.32 11.79 12.26
Over 290.2 44.5 2 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
Over 250.0 167.7-290.2 50.5 9.60 10.10 10.61 11.11 11.62 12.12 12.63 13.13
Over 290.2 48.0 3 9.13 9.62 10.10 10.58 11.06 11.54 12.02 12.50
</TABLE>
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR SINGLE TAXPAYERS WITH ONE PERSONAL EXEMPTION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 22.8 $ 0-111.8 25.0 % 6.33 6.67 7.00 7.33 7.67 8.00 8.33 8.67
22.8- 55.1 0-111.8 36.5 7.48 7.87 8.27 8.66 9.06 9.45 9.84 10.24
55.1-115.0 0-111.8 39.5 7.85 8.26 8.68 9.09 9.50 9.92 10.33 10.74
111.8-234.3 40.5 7.98 8.40 8.82 9.24 9.66 10.08 10.50 10.92
115.0-250.0 111.8-234.3 45.5 8.72 9.17 9.63 10.09 10.55 11.01 11.47 11.93
Over 234.3 44.5 2 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
Over 250.0 Over 234.3 48.0 3 9.13 9.62 10.10 10.58 11.06 11.54 12.02 12.50
<FN>
- ------------------
1 The table reflects the effect of the limitations on itemized deductions and the deduction for personal exemptions. They
were designed to phase out certain benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers. These limitations, in effect, raise
the current maximum marginal Federal tax rate to approximately 44.0 percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to
four personal exemptions and to approximately 41.0 percent for taxpayers filing a single return entitled to only one personal
exemption. These limitations are subject to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed and the total
amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to
lose more than 80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions.
2 Federal tax rate reverts to 36.0% after the 80% cap on the limitation on itemized deductions has been met.
3 Federal tax rate reverts to 39.6% after the 80% cap on the limitation on itemized deductions has been met.
</TABLE>
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns
with the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trust and returns over specified periods on other similar Nuveen Trusts with
returns on taxable investments such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank
CD's and money market accounts or money market funds, each of which has
investment characteristics that may differ from those of the Trust. U.S.
Government bonds, for example, are backed by the full faith and credit of the
U.S. Government and bank CD's and money market accounts are insured by an agency
of the federal government. Money market accounts and money market funds provide
stability of principal, but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition
of the short-term debt market. The investment characteristics of the Trust are
described more fully elsewhere in this Prospectus.
30
<PAGE>
Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust
Schedule of Investments at Date of Deposit
July 14, 1994
MASSACHUSETTS INSURED TRUST 115
(Series 739)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ratings(3) Trustee's
Optional --------------------- Determination
Aggregate Name of Issuer and Title of Issue Represented Redemption Standard of Offering
Principal by Sponsor's Contracts to Purchase Bonds(1) Provisions(2) & Poor's Moody's Price(4)
<C> <C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 500,000 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 2003 at 100 AAA Aaa $ 442,780
General Transportation System Bonds, 1992
Series B Refunding, 5.50% Due 3/1/21.
(Original issue discount bonds delivered on
or about January 19, 1993 at a price of
89.125% of principal amount.)(General
Obligation Bonds.)
500,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 455,600
Authority, Revenue Bonds, Lahey Clinic
Medical Center Issue, Series B, 5.625% Due
7/1/15.
500,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities 2002 at 102 AAA Aaa 505,565
Authority, Revenue Bonds, MetroWest Health,
Inc. Issue, Series C, 6.50% Due 11/15/18.
500,000 * Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency Revenue 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa 500,000
and Refunding Bonds, 1994 Series A (Combined
Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston, Inc.
Project), 6.375% Due 2/1/15. (When issued.)
460,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 406,695
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Milton Academy
Issue, Series B, 5.25% Due 9/1/13.
415,000 Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric 2002 at 102 AAA Aaa 403,368
Company, A Public Corporation of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Power Supply
System Revenue Bonds, 1992 Series D, 6.125%
Due 7/1/19.
500,000 Massachusetts Port Authority, Revenue Bonds, 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 480,120
Series 1992-B, 6.00% Due 7/1/23.
125,000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement 2004 at 101 1/2 AAA Aaa 128,663
Bonds of 1994 (General Obligation Bonds),
6.50% Due 7/1/23.
- ----------- ---------------
$ 3,500,000 $ 3,322,791
- ----------- ---------------
- ----------- ---------------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Schedules of Investments, page 49.
* These Bonds, or a portion thereof, have delivery dates beyond the normal
settlement date. Their expected delivery date is July 28, 1994. Contracts
relating to Bonds with delivery dates after the date of settlement for
purchase made on the Date of Deposit constitute approximately 14% of the
aggregate principal amount of the Trust. (See Section 4.)
31
<PAGE>
NEW JERSEY INSURED TRUST 177
The Portfolio of New Jersey Insured Trust 177 consists of 7 obligations
issued by entities located in New Jersey and one obligation issued by an entity
located in the Territory of Puerto Rico. One Bond in the Trust is a general
obligation of the governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing
power thereof. Seven Bonds in the Trust are payable as to principal and interest
from the income of a specific project or authority and are not supported by the
issuer's power to levy taxes. The sources of payment for these Bonds are divided
as follows: College and University Revenue, 1; Electrical System Revenue, 1;
Health Care Facility Revenue, 3; Transportation Facility Revenue, 1; Municipal
Lease Revenue, 1. All of the Bonds in the Trust, as insured, are rated AAA by
Standard & Poor's Corporation and Aaa by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
At the Date of Deposit, the average maturity of the Bonds in the New Jersey
Insured Trust is 29.1 years. The average maturity of the Bonds in a Trust is
calculated based upon the stated maturities of the Bonds in such Trust (or, with
respect to Bonds for which funds or securities have been placed in escrow to
redeem such Bonds on a stated call date, based upon such call date). The average
maturity of the Bonds in a Trust may increase or decrease from time to time as
Bonds mature or are called or sold.
Approximately 38% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds in the
Trust consists of obligations of issuers whose revenues are primarily derived
from services provided by hospitals or other health care facilities.
For a discussion of the risks associated with investments in the bonds of
various issuers, see "General Trust Information" in this section.
The Sponsor entered into contracts to acquire the Bonds on July 12, 1994.
The following summarizes certain information about the Bonds as of the business
day prior to the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Difference between Trustee's
Determination of Offering Price and
Cost to Profit (or loss) Annual Interest Bid Price the Bid Price
Sponsor to Sponsor Income to Trust of Bonds (as % of principal amount)
---------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------- -----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$3,290,006 $16,577 $206,040 $3,288,458 .52%
</TABLE>
Neither cost to Sponsor nor profit (or loss) to Sponsor reflects
underwriting profits or losses received or incurred by the Sponsor through its
participation in underwriting syndicates. An underwriter or underwriting
syndicate purchases bonds from the issuer on a negotiated or competitive bid
basis as principal with the motive of marketing such bonds to investors at a
profit. The Sponsor did not participate as either the sole underwriter or as a
manager or member of a syndicate that acted as the original underwriter of any
of the Bonds.
Unitholders may elect to have interest distributions made on a monthly,
quarterly or semi-annual basis. The interest on the Bonds initially deposited in
the New Jersey Insured Trust, less estimated expenses, is estimated to accrue at
the rate of $.01578 per Unit per day under the semi-annual plan of distribution,
$.01572 per Unit per day under the quarterly plan of distribution and $.01564
per Unit per day under the monthly plan of distribution. It is anticipated that
the amount of interest to be distributed per Unit in each year under each plan
of distribution will initially be substantially equal to the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit for that plan.
32
<PAGE>
Details of interest distributions per Unit of the New Jersey Insured Trust
under the various plans appear in the following table based upon estimated Net
Annual Interest Income at the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Normal
Distributions
New Jersey Insured Trust 1994 1995 per Year
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
Record Date*.......................... 8/1 11/1 2/1 5/1
Distribution Date..................... 8/15 11/15 2/15 5/15
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly Distribution Plan............. $ .2670(1) $ 5.6580
-------- $.4713 every month --------
Quarterly Distribution Plan........... $ .2670(1) $ 1.4220(2) $ 1.4220 $ 1.4220 $ 5.6900
Semi-Annual Distribution Plan......... $ .2670(1) $ 1.4265(3) $ 2.8530 $ 5.7090
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
* Record Dates for semi-annual distributions are May 1 and November 1; for quarterly distributions, they are February 1, May 1,
August 1 and November 1. Record Dates for monthly distributions are the first day of each month.
(1) The first distribution will be paid to all Unitholders, regardless of the distribution plan selected. Such distribution may
be more or less than a regular monthly distribution.
(2) Regular 3-month distribution.
(3) The second distribution under the semi-annual distribution plan represents a 3-month distribution; subsequent semi-annual
distributions will be regular 6-month distributions.
</TABLE>
The accrual amounts set forth above, and in turn the amount of interest to
be distributed annually per Unit, will generally change as Bonds are redeemed,
mature or are sold or as fees and expenses increase or decrease.
TAX STATUS--NEW JERSEY INSURED TRUST
For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on New Jersey
Insured Trust Units, see Section 11.
The assets of the New Jersey Insured Trust will consist of interest-bearing
obligations issued by or on behalf of the State of New Jersey and counties,
municipalities, authorities and other political subdivisions thereof, and
certain territories of the United States, including Puerto Rico, Guam, the
Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands (the "New Jersey Bonds").
In the opinion of Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, special counsel to the
Series for New Jersey tax matters, under existing law:
The New Jersey Insured Trust will be recognized as a Trust and not an
association taxable as a corporation. The New Jersey Insured Trust will not
be subject to the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax or the New Jersey
Corporation Income Tax.
With respect to the non-corporate Unitholders who are residents of New
Jersey, the income of the New Jersey Insured Trust will be treated as the
income of such Unitholders under the New Jersey Gross Income Tax. Interest
on the underlying New Jersey Bonds which is exempt from tax under the New
Jersey Gross Income Tax Law when received by the New Jersey Insured Trust
will retain its status as tax-exempt interest when distributed to the
Unitholders.
A non-corporate Unitholder will not be subject to the New Jersey Gross
Income Tax on any gain realized either when the New Jersey Insured Trust
disposes of a New Jersey Bond (whether by sale, exchange, redemption, or
payment at maturity) or when the Unitholder redeems or sells his Units. Any
loss realized on such disposition may not be utilized to offset gains
realized by such Unitholder on the disposition of assets the gain on which
is subject to the New Jersey Gross Income Tax.
33
<PAGE>
Units of the New Jersey Insured Trust may be taxable on the death of a
Unitholder under the New Jersey Transfer Inheritance Tax Law or the New
Jersey Estate Tax Law.
If a Unitholder is a corporation subject to the New Jersey Corporation
Business Tax or New Jersey Corporation Income Tax, interest from the Bonds
in the New Jersey Insured Trust which is allocable to such corporation will
be includable in its entire net income for purposes of the New Jersey
Corporation Business Tax or New Jersey Corporation Income Tax, less any
interest expense incurred to carry such investment to the extent such
interest expense has not been deducted in computing Federal taxable income.
Net gains derived by such corporation on the disposition of the New Jersey
Bonds by the New Jersey Insured Trust or on the disposition of its Units
will be included in its entire net income for purposes of the New Jersey
Corporation Business Tax or New Jersey Corporation Income Tax.
ECONOMIC FACTORS--NEW JERSEY
As described above, the New Jersey Insured Trust consists of a portfolio of
New Jersey Bonds. The Trust is therefore susceptible to political, economic or
regulatory factors affecting issuers of the New Jersey Bonds. The following
information provides only a brief summary of some of the complex factors
affecting the financial situation in New Jersey (the "State") and is derived
from sources that are generally available to investors and is believed to be
accurate. It is based in part on information obtained from various State and
local agencies in New Jersey. No independent verification has been made of any
of the following information.
New Jersey is the ninth largest state in population and the fifth smallest
in land area. With an average of 1,050 people per square mile, it is the most
densely populated of all the states. The State's economic base is diversified,
consisting of a variety of manufacturing, construction and service industries,
supplemented by rural areas with selective commercial agriculture. Historically,
New Jersey's average per capita income has been well above the national average,
and in 1992 the State ranked second among the states in per capita personal
income ($26,457).
The New Jersey Economic Policy Council, a statutory arm of the New Jersey
Department of Commerce and Economic Development, has reported in NEW JERSEY
ECONOMIC INDICATORS, a monthly publication of the New Jersey Department of
Labor, Division of Labor Market and Demographic Research, that in 1988 and 1989
employment in New Jersey's manufacturing sector failed to benefit from the
export boom experienced by many Midwest states and the State's service sectors,
which had fueled the State's prosperity since 1982, lost momentum. In the
meantime, the prolonged fast growth in the State in the mid 1980s resulted in a
tight labor market situation, which has led to relatively high wages and housing
prices. This means that, while the incomes of New Jersey residents are
relatively high, the State's business sector has become more vulnerable to
competitive pressures.
The onset of the national recession (which officially began in July 1990
according to the National Bureau of Economic Research) caused an acceleration of
New Jersey's job losses in construction and manufacturing. In addition, the
national recession caused an employment downturn in such previously growing
sectors as wholesale trade, retail trade, finance, utilities and trucking and
warehousing. Reflecting the downturn, the rate of unemployment in the State rose
from a low of 3.6% during the first quarter of 1989 to an estimated 6.9% in May
1994, which is higher than the national average of 6.0% in May 1994. Economic
recovery is
34
<PAGE>
likely to be slow and uneven in New Jersey, with unemployment receding at a
correspondingly slow pace, due to the fact that some sectors may lag due to
continued excess capacity. In addition, employers even in rebounding sectors can
be expected to remain cautious about hiring until they become convinced that
improved business will be sustained. Also, certain firms will continue to merge
or downsize to increase profitability.
DEBT SERVICE. The primary method for State financing of capital projects is
through the sale of the general obligation bonds of the State. These bonds are
backed by the full faith and credit of the State tax revenues and certain other
fees are pledged to meet the principal and interest payments and if provided,
redemption premium payments, if any, required to repay the bonds. As of June 30,
1993, there was a total authorized bond indebtedness of approximately $8.98
billion, of which $3.6 billion was issued and outstanding, $4.0 billion was
retired (including bonds for which provision for payment has been made through
the sale and issuance of refunding bonds) and $1.38 billion was unissued. The
debt service obligation for such outstanding indebtedness is $119.9 million for
Fiscal Year 1994.
NEW JERSEY'S BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION SYSTEM. The State operates on a fiscal
year beginning July 1 and ending June 30. At the end of Fiscal Year 1989, there
was a surplus in the State's general fund (the fund into which all State
revenues not otherwise restricted by statute are deposited and from which
appropriations are made) of $411.2 million. At the end of Fiscal Year 1990,
there was a surplus in the general fund of $1 million. At the end of Fiscal Year
1991, there was a surplus in the general fund of $1.4 million. New Jersey closed
its Fiscal Year 1992 with a surplus of $760.8 million. It is estimated that New
Jersey closed its Fiscal Year 1993 with a surplus of $361.3 million.
In order to provide additional revenues to balance future budgets, to
redistribute school aid and to contain real property taxes, on June 27, 1990,
and July 12, 1990, Governor Florio signed into law legislation which was
estimated to raise approximately $2.8 billion in additional taxes (consisting of
$1.5 billion in sales and use taxes and $1.3 billion in income taxes), the
biggest tax hike in New Jersey history. There can be no assurance that receipts
and collections of such taxes will meet such estimates.
The first part of the tax hike took effect on July 1, 1990, with the
increase in the State's sales and use tax rate from 6% to 7% and the elimination
of exemptions for certain products and services not previously subject to the
tax, such as telephone calls, paper products (which has since been reinstated),
soaps and detergents, janitorial services, alcoholic beverages and cigarettes.
At the time of enactment, it was projected that these taxes would raise
approximately $1.5 billion in additional revenue. Projections and estimates of
receipts from sales and use taxes, however, have been subject to variance in
recent fiscal years.
The second part of the tax hike took effect on January 1, 1991, in the form
of an increased state income tax on individuals. At the time of enactment, it
was projected that this increase would raise approximately $1.3 billion in
additional income taxes to fund a new school aid formula, a new homestead rebate
program and state assumption of welfare and social services costs. Projections
and estimates of receipts from income taxes, however, have also been subject to
variance in recent fiscal years. Under the legislation, income tax rates
increased from their previous range of 2% to 3.5% to a new range of 2% to 7%,
with the higher rates applying to married couples with incomes exceeding $70,000
who file joint returns, and to individuals filing single returns with incomes of
more than $35,000.
The Florio administration has contended that the income tax package will
help reduce local property tax increases by providing more state aid to
municipalities. Under the income tax legislation the State will assume
approximately $289 million in social services costs that
35
<PAGE>
previously were paid by counties and municipalities and funded by property
taxes. In addition, under the new formula for funding school aid, an extra $1.1
billion is proposed to be sent by the State to school districts beginning in
1991, thus reducing the need for property tax increases to support education
programs.
Effective July 1, 1992, the State's sales and use tax rate decreased from 7%
to 6% and effective January 1, 1994, a 5% reduction in the income tax rates was
enacted.
On June 30, 1994, Governor Whitman signed the New Jersey Legislature's $15.7
billion budget for Fiscal Year 1995. The balanced budget, which includes $455
million in surplus, is $141 million less than the 1994 budget. Whether the State
can achieve a balanced budget depends on its ability to enact and implement
expenditure reductions and to collect estimated tax revenues.
LITIGATION. The State is a party in numerous legal proceedings pertaining to
matters incidental to the performance of routine governmental operations. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, claims asserted against the State
arising from alleged torts, alleged breaches of contracts, condemnation
proceedings and other alleged violations of State and Federal laws. Included in
the State's outstanding litigation are cases challenging the following: the
formula relating to State aid to public schools, the method by which the State
shares with its counties maintenance recoveries and costs for residents in State
institutions, unreasonably low Medicaid payment rates for long-term facilities
in New Jersey, the obligation of counties to maintain Medicaid or Medicare
eligible residents of institutions and facilities for the developmentally
disabled, taxes paid into the Spill Compensation Fund (a fund established to
provide money for use by the State to remediate hazardous waste sites and to
compensate other persons for damages incurred as a result of hazardous waste
discharge) based on Federal preemption, various provisions, and the
constitutionality, of the Fair Automobile Insurance Reform Act of 1990, the
State's method of funding the judicial system, certain provisions of New
Jersey's hospital rate-setting system, the adequacy of Medicaid reimbursement
for services rendered by doctors and dentists to Medicaid eligible children, the
Commissioner of Health's calculation of the hospital assessment required by the
Health Care Cost Reduction Act of 1991, refusal of the State to share with
Camden County federal funding the State recently received for disproportionate
share hospital payments made to county psychiatric facilities, and recently
enacted legislation calling for a revaluation of several New Jersey public
employee pension funds in order to provide additional revenues for the State's
general fund. Adverse judgments in these and other matters could have the
potential for either a significant loss of revenue or a significant
unanticipated expenditure by the State.
At any given time, there are various numbers of claims and cases pending
against the State, State agencies and employees seeking recovery of monetary
damages that are primarily paid out of the fund created pursuant to the New
Jersey Tort Claims Act. In addition, at any given time, there are various
numbers of contract claims against the State and State agencies seeking recovery
of monetary damages. The State is unable to estimate its exposure for these
claims.
DEBT RATINGS. For many years prior to 1991, both Moody's Investors Service,
Inc. and Standard and Poor's Corporation had rated New Jersey general obligation
bonds Aaa and "AAA," respectively. On July 3, 1991, however, Standard and Poor's
Corporation downgraded New Jersey general obligation bonds to "AA+." On June 4,
1992, Standard and Poor's Corporation placed New Jersey general obligation bonds
on CreditWatch with negative implications, citing as its principal reason for
its caution the unexpected denial by the
36
<PAGE>
Federal Government of New Jersey's request for $450 million in retroactive
Medicaid payments for psychiatric hospitals. These funds were critical to
closing a $1 billion gap in the State's $15 billion budget for fiscal year 1992
which ended on June 30, 1992. Under New Jersey state law, the gap in the current
budget must be closed before the new budget year begins on July 1, 1992.
Standard and Poor's Corporation suggested the State could close fiscal 1992's
budget gap and help fill fiscal 1993's hole by a reversion of $700 million of
pension contributions to its general fund under a proposal to change the way the
State calculates its pension liability. On July 6, 1992, Standard and Poor's
Corporation reaffirmed its "AA+" rating for New Jersey general obligation bonds
and removed the debt from its Credit Watch list, although it stated that New
Jersey's long-term financial outlook was negative. Standard and Poor's
Corporation was concerned that the State was entering the 1993 fiscal year that
began July 1, 1992, with a slim $26 million surplus and remained concerned about
whether the sagging State economy would recover quickly enough to meet
lawmakers' revenue projections. It also remained concerned about the recent
federal ruling leaving in doubt how much the State was due in retroactive
Medicaid reimbursements and a ruling by a federal judge, now on appeal, of the
State's method for paying for uninsured hospital patients.
On August 24, 1992, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. downgraded New Jersey
general obligation bonds to "Aa1", stating that the reduction reflected a
developing pattern of reliance on nonrecurring measures to achieve budgetary
balance, four years of financial operations marked by revenue shortfalls and
operating deficits, and the likelihood that serious financial pressures would
persist.
Although New Jersey recently received $412 million in settlement of its $450
million dispute with the federal government for retroactive medicaid
reimbursements, neither Moody's Investors Service, Inc. nor Standard and Poor's
Corporation has revised its rating for New Jersey general obligation bonds.
NEW JERSEY TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLE
The following tables show the approximate taxable estimated current returns
for individuals that are equivalent to tax-exempt estimated current returns
under combined Federal and state taxes, using published 1994 marginal Federal
tax rates and marginal state tax rates currently available and scheduled to be
in effect. The tables incorporate increased tax rates for higher-income
taxpayers that were included in the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. For
cases in which more than one state bracket falls within a Federal bracket, the
highest state bracket is combined with the Federal bracket. The combined state
and Federal tax brackets shown reflect the fact that state tax payments are
currently deductible for Federal tax purposes. The tables illustrate what you
would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt estimated
current return for your income tax bracket. A taxpayer's marginal tax rate is
affected by both his taxable income and his adjusted gross income. Locate your
adjusted gross and your taxable income (which is your adjusted gross income
reduced by any deductions and exemptions), then locate your tax bracket based on
joint or single tax filing. Read across to the equivalent taxable estimated
current return you would need to match the tax-free income.
37
<PAGE>
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR JOINT TAXPAYERS WITH FOUR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 38.0 $ 0-111.8 17.0 % 5.72 6.02 6.33 6.63 6.93 7.23 7.53 7.83
38.0- 91.9 0-111.8 32.5 7.04 7.41 7.78 8.15 8.52 8.89 9.26 9.63
111.8-167.7 33.0 7.09 7.46 7.84 8.21 8.58 8.96 9.33 9.70
91.9-140.0 0-111.8 35.5 7.36 7.75 8.14 8.53 8.91 9.30 9.69 10.08
111.8-167.7 36.0 7.42 7.81 8.20 8.59 8.98 9.38 9.77 10.16
167.7-290.2 38.5 7.72 8.13 8.54 8.94 9.35 9.76 10.16 10.57
140.0-250.0 111.8-167.7 41.5 8.12 8.55 8.97 9.40 9.83 10.26 10.68 11.11
167.7-290.2 44.0 8.48 8.93 9.38 9.82 10.27 10.71 11.16 11.61
Over 290.2 41.5 2 8.12 8.55 8.97 9.40 9.83 10.26 10.68 11.11
Over 250.0 167.7-290.2 47.5 9.05 9.52 10.00 10.48 10.95 11.43 11.90 12.38
Over 290.2 44.5 3 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
</TABLE>
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR SINGLE TAXPAYERS WITH ONE PERSONAL EXEMPTION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 22.8 $ 0-111.8 17.0 % 5.72 6.02 6.33 6.63 6.93 7.23 7.53 7.83
22.8- 55.1 0-111.8 32.5 7.04 7.41 7.78 8.15 8.52 8.89 9.26 9.63
55.1-115.0 0-111.8 35.5 7.36 7.75 8.14 8.53 8.91 9.30 9.69 10.08
111.8-234.3 37.0 7.54 7.94 8.33 8.73 9.13 9.52 9.92 10.32
115.0-250.0 111.8-234.3 42.0 8.19 8.62 9.05 9.48 9.91 10.34 10.78 11.21
Over 234.3 41.5 2 8.12 8.55 8.97 9.40 9.83 10.26 10.68 11.11
Over 250.0 Over 234.3 44.5 3 8.56 9.01 9.46 9.91 10.36 10.81 11.26 11.71
<FN>
- ------------------
1 The table reflects the effect of the limitations on itemized deductions and the deduction for personal exemptions. They
were designed to phase out certain benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers. These limitations, in effect, raise
the current maximum marginal Federal tax rate to approximately 44.0 percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to
four personal exemptions and to approximately 41.0 percent for taxpayers filing a single return entitled to only one personal
exemption. These limitations are subject to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed and the total
amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to
lose more than 80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions.
2 Federal tax rate reverts to 36.0% after the 80% cap on the limitation on itemized deductions has been met.
3 Federal tax rate reverts to 39.6% after the 80% cap on the limitation on itemized deductions has been met.
</TABLE>
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns
with the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trust and returns over specified periods on other similar Nuveen Trusts with
returns on taxable investments such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank
CD's and money market accounts or money market funds, each of which has
investment characteristics that may differ from those of the Trust. U.S.
Government bonds, for example, are backed by the full faith and credit of the
U.S. Government and bank CD's and money market accounts are insured by an agency
of the federal government. Money market accounts and money market funds provide
stability of principal, but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition
of the short-term debt market. The investment characteristics of the Trust are
described more fully elsewhere in this Prospectus.
38
<PAGE>
Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust
Schedule of Investments at Date of Deposit
July 14, 1994
NEW JERSEY INSURED TRUST 177
(Series 739)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ratings(3) Trustee's
Optional --------------------- Determination
Aggregate Name of Issuer and Title of Issue Represented Redemption Standard of Offering
Principal by Sponsor's Contracts to Purchase Bonds(1) Provisions(2) & Poor's Moody's Price(4)
<C> <C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 500,000 New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa $ 483,145
Revenue Bonds, New Jersey Institute of
Technology Issue, Series 1994A, 6.00% Due
7/1/24.
300,000 New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 272,937
Authority, Revenue Bonds, The Mountainside
Hospital Issue, Series 1993, 5.50% Due
7/1/14.
500,000 * New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa 493,565
Authority, Revenue Bonds, Jersey Shore
Medical Center Obligated Group Issue, Series
1994, 6.25% Due 7/1/21. (When issued.)
520,000 New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 475,457
Authority Revenue Bonds, Underwood-Memorial
Hospital Issue, Series B, 5.70% Due 7/1/23.
180,000 New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority, 2003 at 101 AAA Aaa 163,094
State Contract Bonds, 1993 Series A, 5.50%
Due 9/1/23.
500,000 The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 2004 at 101 AAA Aaa 414,985
Consolidated Bonds, Ninety-Second Series,
5.00% Due 7/15/22.
500,000 The Pollution Control Financing Authority of 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa 488,750
Salem County (New Jersey), Pollution Control
Revenue Refunding Bonds of 1994, Series B
(Public Service Electric and Gas Company
Project), 6.25% Due 6/1/31.
500,000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement 2004 at 101 1/2 AAA Aaa 514,650
Bonds of 1994 (General Obligation Bonds),
6.50% Due 7/1/23.
- ----------- ---------------
$ 3,500,000 $ 3,306,583
- ----------- ---------------
- ----------- ---------------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Schedules of Investments, page 49.
* These Bonds, or a portion thereof, have delivery dates beyond the normal
settlement date. Their expected delivery date is August 2, 1994. Contracts
relating to Bonds with delivery dates after the date of settlement for
purchase made on the Date of Deposit constitute approximately 14% of the
aggregate principal amount of the Trust. (See Section 4.)
39
<PAGE>
PENNSYLVANIA INSURED TRUST 183
The Portfolio of Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183 consists of 6 obligations
issued by entities located in Pennsylvania and one obligation issued by an
entity located in the Territory of Puerto Rico. One Bond in the Trust is a
general obligation of the governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the
taxing power thereof. Six Bonds in the Trust are payable as to principal and
interest from the income of a specific project or authority and are not
supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. The sources of payment for these
bonds are divided as follows: Dedicated-Tax Supported Revenue, 1; College and
University Revenue, 1; Electrical System Revenue, 1; Health Care Facility
Revenue, 2; Water and/or Sewer Revenue, 1. All of the Bonds in the Trust, as
insured, are rated AAA by Standard & Poor's Corporation and Aaa by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc.
At the Date of Deposit, the average maturity of the Bonds in the
Pennsylvania Insured Trust is 29.3 years. The average maturity of the Bonds in a
Trust is calculated based upon the stated maturities of the Bonds in such Trust
(or, with respect to Bonds for which funds or securities have been placed in
escrow to redeem such Bonds on a stated call date, based upon such call date).
The average maturity of the Bonds in a Trust may increase or decrease from time
to time as Bonds mature or are called or sold.
Approximately 29% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds in the
Trust consists of obligations of issuers whose revenues are primarily derived
from services provided by hospitals or other health care facilities.
For a discussion of the risks associated with investments in the bonds of
various issuers, see "General Trust Information" in this section.
The Sponsor entered into contracts to acquire the Bonds between July 12,
1994 and July 13, 1994. The following summarizes certain information about the
Bonds as of the business day prior to the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Difference between Trustee's
Determination of Offering Price and
Cost to Profit (or loss) Annual Interest Bid Price the Bid Price
Sponsor to Sponsor Income to Trust of Bonds (as % of principal amount)
---------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------- -----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$3,324,498 $15,777 $210,250 $3,322,775 .50%
</TABLE>
Neither cost to Sponsor nor profit (or loss) to Sponsor reflects
underwriting profits or losses received or incurred by the Sponsor through its
participation in underwriting syndicates. An underwriter or underwriting
syndicate purchases bonds from the issuer on a negotiated or competitive bid
basis as principal with the motive of marketing such bonds to investors at a
profit. The Sponsor did not participate as either the sole underwriter or as a
manager or member of a syndicate that acted as the original underwriter of any
of the Bonds.
Unitholders may elect to have interest distributions made on a monthly,
quarterly or semi-annual basis. The interest on the Bonds initially deposited in
the Pennsylvania Insured Trust, less estimated expenses, is estimated to accrue
at the rate of $.01614 per Unit per day under the semi-annual plan of
distribution, $.01609 per Unit per day under the quarterly plan of distribution
and $.01600 per Unit per day under the monthly plan of distribution. It is
anticipated that the amount of interest to be distributed per Unit in each year
under each plan of distribution will initially be substantially equal to the
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit for that plan.
40
<PAGE>
Details of interest distributions per Unit of the Pennsylvania Insured Trust
under the various plans appear in the following table based upon estimated Net
Annual Interest Income at the Date of Deposit:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Normal
Distributions
Pennsylvania Insured Trust 1994 1995 per Year
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
Record Date*.......................... 8/1 11/1 2/1 5/1
Distribution Date..................... 8/15 11/15 2/15 5/15
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly Distribution Plan............. $ .2728(1) $ 5.7802
-------- $.4815 every month --------
Quarterly Distribution Plan........... $ .2728(1) $ 1.4526(2) $ 1.4526 $ 1.4526 $ 5.8122
Semi-Annual Distribution Plan......... $ .2728(1) $ 1.4571(3) $ 2.9142 $ 5.8312
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
* Record Dates for semi-annual distributions are May 1 and November 1; for quarterly distributions, they are February 1, May 1,
August 1 and November 1. Record Dates for monthly distributions are the first day of each month.
(1) The first distribution will be paid to all Unitholders, regardless of the distribution plan selected. Such distribution may
be more or less than a regular monthly distribution.
(2) Regular 3-month distribution.
(3) The second distribution under the semi-annual distribution plan represents a 3-month distribution; subsequent semi-annual
distributions will be regular 6-month distributions.
</TABLE>
The accrual amounts set forth above, and in turn the amount of interest to
be distributed annually per Unit, will generally change as Bonds are redeemed,
mature or are sold or as fees and expenses increase or decrease.
TAX STATUS--PENNSYLVANIA INSURED TRUST
For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on Pennsylvania
Insured Trust Units, see Section 11.
In the opinion of Dechert Price & Rhoads, special Pennsylvania counsel to
the Series, under existing law:
Units evidencing fractional undivided interests in the Pennsylvania
Insured Trust are not subject to any of the personal property taxes
presently in effect in Pennsylvania to the extent of that proportion of the
Trust represented by Bonds issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, its
agencies and instrumentalities, or by any county, city, borough, town,
township, school district, municipality and local housing or parking
authority in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or issued by Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands ("Pennsylvania Bonds").
The taxes referred to above include the County Personal Property Tax, the
additional personal property taxes imposed on Pittsburgh residents by the
School District of Pittsburgh and by the City of Pittsburgh. The City of
Pittsburgh, the School District of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County cannot
impose personal property taxes as of January 1, 1995. Pennsylvania Insured
Trust Units may be taxable under the Pennsylvania inheritance and estate
taxes.
The proportion of interest income representing interest income from
Pennsylvania Bonds distributed to Unitholders of the Pennsylvania Insured
Trust is not taxable under the Pennsylvania Personal Income Tax or under the
Corporate Net Income Tax imposed on corporations by Article IV of the Tax
Reform Code. Nor will such interest be taxable under the Philadelphia School
District Investment Income Tax imposed on Philadelphia resident individuals.
The disposition by the Pennsylvania Insured Trust of a Pennsylvania Bond
(whether by sale, exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) will not
constitute a taxable event to a Unitholder under the Pennsylvania Personal
Income Tax if the Pennsylvania Bond was issued prior to February 1, 1994.
Further, although there is no published
41
<PAGE>
authority on the subject, counsel is of the opinion that (i) a Unitholder of
the Pennsylvania Insured Trust will not have a taxable event under the
Pennsylvania state and local income taxes referred to in the preceding
paragraph (other than the Corporate Net Income Tax) upon the redemption or
sale of his Unit to the extent that the Pennsylvania Insured Trust is then
comprised of Pennsylvania Bonds issued prior to February 1, 1994 and (ii)
the dispositions by the Pennsylvania Insured Trust of a Pennsylvania Bond
(whether by sale, exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) will not
constitute a taxable event to a Unitholder under the Corporate Net Income
Tax or the Philadelphia School District Investment Income Tax if the
Pennsylvania Bond was issued prior to February 1, 1994. (The School District
tax has no application to gain on the disposition of property held by the
taxpayer for more than six months.)
Gains on the sale, exchange, redemption, or payment at maturity of a
Pennsylvania Bond issued on or after February 1, 1994, will be taxable under
all of these taxes, as will gains on the redemption or sale of a unit to the
extent that the Trust is comprised of Pennsylvania Bonds issued on or after
February 1, 1994.
ECONOMIC FACTORS--PENNSYLVANIA
RISK FACTORS--Prospective investors should consider the financial
difficulties and pressures which the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and certain of
its municipal subdivisions have undergone. Both the Commonwealth and the City of
Philadelphia have historically experienced significant revenue shortfalls. There
can be no assurance that the Commonwealth will not experience further declines
in economic conditions or that portions of the municipal obligations purchased
by the Fund will not be affected by such declines. Without intending to be
complete, the following briefly summarizes some of these difficulties and the
current financial situation, as well as some of the complex factors affecting
the financial situation in the Commonwealth. It is derived from sources that are
generally available to investors and is based in part on information obtained
from various agencies in the Commonwealth. No independent verification has been
made of the following information.
STATE ECONOMY--Pennsylvania has been historically identified as a heavy
industry state although that reputation has changed recently as the industrial
composition of the Commonwealth diversified when the coal, steel and railroad
industries began to decline. The major new sources of growth in the Commonwealth
are in the service sector, including trade, medical and health services,
education and financial institutions. The Commonwealth's agricultural industries
are also an important component of its economic structure, accounting for more
than $3.6 billion in crop and livestock products annually while agribusiness and
food related industries support $38 billion in economic activity annually.
Non-agricultural employment within the Commonwealth has increased steadily
from 1984 to its 1992 level of 81.3 percent of total employment. The growth in
employment experienced in the Commonwealth is comparable to the nationwide
growth in employment which has occurred during this period. In 1993,
manufacturing employment represented 18.4 percent of all non-agricultural
employment in the Commonwealth while the services sector accounted for 29.9
percent and the trade sector accounted for 22.4 percent.
The Commonwealth recently experienced a slowdown in its economy. Moreover,
economic strengths and weaknesses vary in different parts of the Commonwealth.
In general, heavy industry and manufacturing have been facing increasing
competition from foreign producers. During 1993, the annual average unemployment
rate in the Commonwealth was 7.0 percent compared to 6.8 percent for the United
States. For May 1994 the unadjusted unemployment rate was 6.4 percent in the
Commonwealth and 5.9 percent in the United
42
<PAGE>
States, while the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the Commonwealth was
6.2 percent and for the United States was 6.0 percent.
STATE BUDGET--The Commonwealth operates under an annual budget which is
formulated and submitted for legislative approval by the Governor each February.
The Pennsylvania Constitution requires that the Governor's budget proposal
consist of three parts: (i) a balanced operating budget setting forth proposed
expenditures and estimated revenues from all sources and, if estimated revenues
and available surplus are less than proposed expenditures, recommending specific
additional sources of revenue sufficient to pay the deficiency; (ii) a capital
budget setting forth proposed expenditures to be financed from the proceeds of
obligations of the Commonwealth or its agencies or from operating funds; and
(iii) a financial plan for not less than the succeeding five fiscal years, which
includes for each year projected operating expenditures and estimated revenues
and projected expenditures for capital projects. The General Assembly may add,
change or delete any items in the budget prepared by the Governor, but the
Governor retains veto power over the individual appropriations passed by the
legislature. The Commonwealth's fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June
30.
All funds received by the Commonwealth are subject to appropriation in
specific amounts by the General Assembly or by executive authorization by the
Governor. Total appropriations enacted by the General Assembly may not exceed
the ensuing year's estimated revenues, plus (less) the unappropriated fund
balance (deficit) of the preceding year, except for constitutionally authorized
debt service payments. Appropriations from the principal operating funds of the
Commonwealth (the General Fund, the Motor License Fund and the State Lottery
Fund) are generally made for one fiscal year and are returned to the
unappropriated surplus of the fund if not spent or encumbered by the end of the
fiscal year. The Constitution specifies that a surplus of operating funds at the
end of a fiscal year must be appropriated for the ensuing year.
Pennsylvania uses the "fund" method of accounting for receipts and
disbursements. For purposes of government accounting, a "fund" is an independent
fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts, recording
cash and/or other resources together with all related liabilities and equities.
In the Commonwealth, over 120 funds have been established by legislative
enactment or in certain cases by administrative action for the purpose of
recording the receipts and disbursement of moneys received by the Commonwealth.
Annual budgets are adopted each fiscal year for the principal operating funds of
the Commonwealth and several other special revenue funds. Expenditures and
encumbrances against these funds may only be made pursuant to appropriation
measures enacted by the General Assembly and approved by the Governor. The
General Fund, the Commonwealth's largest fund, receives all tax revenues,
non-tax revenues and federal grants and entitlements that are not specified by
law to be deposited elsewhere. The majority of the Commonwealth's operating and
administrative expenses are payable from the General Fund. Debt service on all
bond indebtedness of the Commonwealth, except that issued for highway purposes
or for the benefit of other special revenue funds, is payable from the General
Fund.
Financial information for the principal operating funds of the Commonwealth
are maintained on a budgetary basis of accounting, which is used for the purpose
of ensuring compliance with the enacted operating budget. The Commonwealth also
prepares annual financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP"). Budgetary basis financial reports are based on a
modified cash basis of accounting as opposed to a modified accrual basis of
accounting prescribed by GAAP. Financial information is adjusted at fiscal
year-end to reflect appropriate accruals for financial reporting in conformity
with GAAP.
43
<PAGE>
RECENT FINANCIAL RESULTS--From fiscal 1984, when the Commonwealth first
prepared its financial statements on a GAAP basis, through fiscal 1989, the
Commonwealth reported a positive unreserved-undesignated fund balance for its
governmental fund types at each fiscal year end. Slowing economic growth during
1990, leading to a national economic recession beginning in fiscal 1991, reduced
revenue growth and increased expenditures and contributed to negative
unreserved-undesignated fund balances at the end of the 1990 and 1991 fiscal
years. At the end of fiscal 1990 and fiscal 1991, the unreserved-undesignated
fund balance was a negative $205.8 million and a negative $1,189.2 million,
respectively, a drop of $579.6 million and $983.4 million, respectively, from
the year-earlier amounts. The decline in the fiscal 1990 unreserved-undesignated
fund balance for government fund types was largely the result of a $718.2
million operating deficit in the General Fund which caused the total fund
balance of the General Fund to fall to a negative $119.8 million at June 30,
1990. The decline in the fiscal 1991 unreserved-undesignated fund balance was
principally the result of operating deficits of $1,076.6 million and $66.2
million, respectively, in the General Fund and the State Lottery Fund.
Rising demands on state programs caused by the economic recession,
particularly for medical assistance and cash assistance programs, and the
increased costs of special education programs and correction facilities and
programs, contributed to increased expenditures in fiscal 1991, while tax
revenues for the 1991 fiscal year were severely affected by the economic
recession. Total corporation tax receipts and sales and use tax receipts during
fiscal 1991 were, respectively, 7.3 percent and 0.9 percent below amounts
collected during fiscal 1990. Personal income tax receipts also were affected by
the recession but not to the extent of the other major General Fund taxes,
increasing only 2.0 percent over fiscal 1990 collections.
The Commonwealth experienced a $454 million general fund deficit as of the
end of its 1991 fiscal year. The deficit reflected below-estimate economic
activity and growth rates of economic indicators and total tax revenue
shortfalls of $817 million (4.1 percent) below those assumed in the enacted
budget. Economic conditions also affected expenditure trends during the 1991
fiscal year, with expenditures for medical assistance costs and other human
service programs running $512 million above estimates assumed in the 1991
budget. In January 1991, the Commonwealth initiated a number of cost-saving
measures, including the firing of 2,000 state employees, deferral of paychecks
and reduction of funds to state universities, which resulted in approximately
$871 million cost savings.
Actions taken during fiscal 1992 to bring the General Fund budget back into
balance, including tax increases and expenditure restraints resulted in a $1.1
billion reduction for the unreserved-undesignated fund deficit for combined
governmental fund types and a return to a positive fund balance. Total general
fund revenues for fiscal 1992 were $14,516.8 million, which is approximately 22
percent higher than fiscal 1991 revenues of $11,877.3 million due in large part
to tax increases. The increased revenues funded substantial increases in
education, social services and corrections programs. As a result of the tax
increases and certain appropriation lapses, fiscal 1992 ended with an $8.8
million surplus after having started the year with an unappropriated balance
deficit of $454 million.
Financial performance continued to improve during fiscal 1993 resulting in a
positive unreserved-undesignated balance for combined governmental fund types at
June 30, 1993, as a result of a $420.4 million increase in the balance. These
gains were produced by continued efforts to control expenditures growth.
FISCAL 1993 BUDGET--On June 30, 1992, the Pennsylvania legislature presented
the Governor with a $14.126 billion general fund budget for the 1993 fiscal
year, which began on
44
<PAGE>
July 1, 1992. Before signing the budget, the Governor deleted approximately $73
million in certain state expenditures such as aid to county courts and district
justices. As a result, the budget for the 1993 fiscal year was approximately
$14.046 billion, which is approximately $105 million more than the fiscal 1992
budget. On February 9, 1993, the Governor announced that he anticipated that the
1993 budget would be in balance at the end of the fiscal year.
FISCAL 1994 BUDGET--On May 28, 1993, the Governor signed a $14.9 billion
general fund budget, an increase of approximately five percent from the fiscal
1993 budget. A substantial amount of the increase is targeted for medical
assistance programs and prisons.
FISCAL 1995 BUDGET--On June 16, 1994, the Governor signed a $15.7 billion
general fund budget, an increase of over 5% from the Fiscal 1994 budget. A
substantial amount of the increase is targeted for human services and prisons.
DEBT LIMITS AND OUTSTANDING DEBT--The Pennsylvania Constitution permits the
issuance of the following types of debt: (i) debt to suppress insurrection or
rehabilitate areas affected by disaster; (ii) electorate approved debt; (iii)
debt for capital projects subject to an aggregate outstanding debt limit of 1.75
times the annual average tax revenues of the preceding five fiscal years; and
(iv) tax anticipation notes payable in the fiscal year of issuance.
Under the Pennsylvania Fiscal Code, the Auditor General is required annually
to certify to the Governor and the General Assembly certain information
regarding the Commonwealth's indebtedness. According to the most recent Auditor
General certificate, the average annual tax revenues deposited in all funds in
the five fiscal years ended June 30, 1993 was $14.5 billion, and therefore, the
net debt limitation for the 1994 fiscal year is $27.1 billion. Outstanding net
debt totaled $4.0 billion at June 30, 1993, a decrease of $42.2 million from
June 30, 1992. At February 28, 1994, the amount of debt authorized by law to be
issued, but not yet incurred was $15.0 billion.
DEBT RATINGS--All outstanding general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth
are rated AA- by S&P and A1 by Moody's.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA--The City of Philadelphia experienced a series of
general fund deficits for fiscal years 1988 through 1992 which have culminated
in the City's present serious financial difficulties. In its 1992 Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report, Philadelphia reported a cumulative general fund deficit
of $71.4 million for fiscal year 1992.
In June 1991, the Pennsylvania legislature established the Pennsylvania
Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority ("PICA"), a five-member board which
oversees the fiscal affairs of the City of Philadelphia. The Legislation
empowers PICA to issue notes and bonds on behalf of Philadelphia, and also
authorizes Philadelphia to levy a one-percent sales tax the proceeds of which
would be used to pay off the bonds. In return for PICA's fiscal assistance,
Philadelphia is required, among other things, to establish a five-year financial
plans that include balanced annual budgets. Under the legislation, if
Philadelphia does not comply with such requirements, PICA may withhold bond
revenues and certain state funding.
In May 1992, the city counsel of Philadelphia approved the Mayor's first
five-year plan and adopted a fiscal 1993 budget. On June 5, 1992, PICA sold
approximately $480 million in bonds at yields ranging from 5.25 percent to 6.88
percent. The proceeds of the bonds were used to cover shortfalls accumulated
over fiscal years 1988 through 1991, projected deficits for fiscal years 1992
and 1993, construction projects and other capital expenditures. In accordance
with the enabling legislation, PICA was guaranteed a percentage of the wage tax
45
<PAGE>
revenue expected to be collected from Philadelphia residents to permit repayment
of the bonds.
In January 1993, Philadelphia anticipated a cumulative general fund budget
deficit of $57 million for the 1993 fiscal year. In response to the anticipated
deficit, the Mayor unveiled a financial plan eliminating the budget deficit for
the 1993 budget year through significant service cuts that included a plan to
privatize certain city provided services. Due to an upsurge in tax receipts,
cost-cutting and additional PICA borrowings, Philadelphia completed the 1993
fiscal year with a balanced general fund budget.
In January 1994, the Mayor proposed a $2.3 billion city general fund budget
that included no tax increases, no significant service cuts and a series of
modest health and welfare program increases. At that time, the Mayor also
unveiled a $2.2 billion program (the "Philadelphia Economic Stimulus Program")
designed to stimulate Philadelphia's economy and stop the loss of 1,000 jobs a
month. However, the success of the Philadelphia Economic Stimulus Program has
been predicated upon several contingencies including, among others, $250 million
in revenues from riverboat gambling over the next three years, which first must
be approved by the state legislature, and $100 million in federal "empowerment
zone" subsidies, which Philadelphia may or may not receive. As of January 1994,
the 1994 general fund budget was running at a deficit of approximately $10
million. The Mayor has predicted that the general fund will be balanced by the
end of the 1994 fiscal year.
The Standard & Poor's Corporation rating on Philadelphia general obligation
bonds is "BB." The Moody's Investors Service rating is currently "Ba."
LITIGATION--The Commonwealth is a party to numerous lawsuits in which an
adverse final decision could materially affect the Commonwealth's governmental
operations and consequently its ability to pay debt service on its obligations.
The Commonwealth also faces tort claims made possible by the limited waiver of
sovereign immunity effected by Act 152, approved September 28, 1978.
PENNSYLVANIA TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLE
The following tables show the approximate taxable estimated current returns
for individuals that are equivalent to tax-exempt estimated current returns
under combined Federal and state taxes, using published 1994 marginal Federal
tax rates and marginal state tax rates currently available and scheduled to be
in effect. The tables incorporate increased tax rates for higher-income
taxpayers that were included in the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. For
cases in which more than one state bracket falls within a Federal bracket, the
highest state bracket is combined with the Federal bracket. The combined state
and Federal tax brackets shown reflect the fact that state tax payments are
currently deductible for Federal tax purposes. The tables illustrate what you
would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt estimated
current return for your income tax bracket. A taxpayer's marginal tax rate is
affected by both his taxable income and his adjusted gross income. Locate your
adjusted gross and your taxable income (which is your adjusted gross income
reduced by any deductions and exemptions), then locate your tax bracket based on
joint or single tax filing. Read across to the equivalent taxable estimated
current return you would need to match the tax-free income.
46
<PAGE>
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR JOINT TAXPAYERS WITH FOUR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State* and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 38.0 $ 0-111.8 17.5 % 5.76 6.06 6.36 6.67 6.97 7.27 7.58 7.88
38.0- 91.9 0-111.8 30.0 6.79 7.14 7.50 7.86 8.21 8.57 8.93 9.29
111.8-167.7 31.0 6.88 7.25 7.61 7.97 8.33 8.70 9.06 9.42
91.9-140.0 0-111.8 33.0 7.09 7.46 7.84 8.21 8.58 8.96 9.33 9.70
111.8-167.7 34.0 7.20 7.58 7.95 8.33 8.71 9.09 9.47 9.85
167.7-290.2 36.0 7.42 7.81 8.20 8.59 8.98 9.38 9.77 10.16
140.0-250.0 111.8-167.7 39.0 7.79 8.20 8.61 9.02 9.43 9.84 10.25 10.66
167.7-290.2 41.5 8.12 8.55 8.97 9.40 9.83 10.26 10.68 11.11
Over 290.2 39.0 2 7.79 8.20 8.61 9.02 9.43 9.84 10.25 10.66
Over 250.0 167.7-290.2 45.5 8.72 9.17 9.63 10.09 10.55 11.01 11.47 11.93
Over 290.2 42.5 3 8.26 8.70 9.13 9.57 10.00 10.43 10.87 11.30
</TABLE>
COMBINED MARGINAL TAX RATES FOR SINGLE TAXPAYERS WITH ONE PERSONAL EXEMPTION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Federal
Federal Adjusted Combined
Taxable Gross State* and Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Income Income Federal --------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000's) (1,000's) Tax Rate1 4.75% 5.00% 5.25% 5.50% 5.75% 6.00% 6.25% 6.50%
------------- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0- 22.8 $ 0-111.8 17.5 5.76 6.06 6.36 6.67 6.97 7.27 7.58 7.88
22.8- 55.1 0-111.8 30.0 6.79 7.14 7.50 7.86 8.21 8.57 8.93 9.29
55.1-115.0 0-111.8 33.0 7.09 7.46 7.84 8.21 8.58 8.96 9.33 9.70
111.8-234.3 34.5 7.25 7.63 8.02 8.40 8.78 9.16 9.54 9.92
115.0-250.0 111.8-234.3 39.5 7.85 8.26 8.68 9.09 9.50 9.92 10.33 10.74
Over 234.3 39.0 2 7.79 8.20 8.61 9.02 9.43 9.84 10.25 10.66
Over 250.0 Over 234.3 42.5 3 8.26 8.70 9.13 9.57 10.00 10.43 10.87 11.30
<FN>
- ------------------
1 The table reflects the effect of the limitations on itemized deductions and the deduction for personal exemptions. They
were designed to phase out certain benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers. These limitations, in effect, raise
the current maximum marginal Federal tax rate to approximately 44.0 percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to
four personal exemptions and to approximately 41.0 percent for taxpayers filing a single return entitled to only one personal
exemption. These limitations are subject to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed and the total
amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to
lose more than 80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions.
2 Federal tax rate reverts to 36.0% after the 80% cap on the limitation on itemized deductions has been met.
3 Federal tax rate reverts to 39.6% after the 80% cap on the limitation on itemized deductions has been met.
</TABLE>
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns
with the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trust and returns over specified periods on other similar Nuveen Trusts with
returns on taxable investments such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank
CD's and money market accounts or money market funds, each of which has
investment characteristics that may differ from those of the Trust. U.S.
Government bonds, for example, are backed by the full faith and credit of the
U.S. Government and bank CD's and money market accounts are insured by an agency
of the federal government. Money market accounts and money market funds provide
stability of principal, but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition
of the short-term debt market. The investment characteristics of the Trust are
described more fully elsewhere in this Prospectus.
47
<PAGE>
Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust
Schedule of Investments at Date of Deposit
July 14, 1994
PENNSYLVANIA INSURED TRUST 183
(Series 739)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ratings(3) Trustee's
Optional --------------------- Determination
Aggregate Name of Issuer and Title of Issue Represented Redemption Standard of Offering
Principal by Sponsor's Contracts to Purchase Bonds(1) Provisions(2) & Poor's Moody's Price(4)
<C> <C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 500,000 Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation 2003 at 100 AAA Aaa $ 452,245
Authority, Special Tax Revenue Bonds (City of
Philadelphia Funding Program), Series of
1993, 5.625% Due 6/15/23.
500,000 * North Penn Water Authority (Montgomery County, 2002 at 101 AAA Aaa 493,375
Pennsylvania), Water Revenue Bonds, Series of
1992, 6.20% Due 11/1/22.
500,000 Berks County Municipal Authority 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa 483,425
(Pennsylvania), Hospital Revenue Bonds (The
Reading Hospital and Medical Center Project),
Series B of 1994, 6.10% Due 10/1/23.
500,000 Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority, 2004 at 102 AAA Aaa 441,765
Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds,
1994 Series A (Pennsylvania Power & Light
Company Project), 5.50% Due 2/15/27.
500,000 Montgomery County Higher Education and Health 2002 at 102 AAA Aaa 505,615
Authority, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania,
Saint Joseph's University Revenue Bonds,
Series of 1992, 6.50% Due 12/15/22.
500,000 Washington County Hospital Authority 2003 at 102 AAA Aaa 449,200
(Commonwealth of Pennsylvania), Hospital
Revenue Bonds, Series of 1993 (The Washington
Hospital Project), 5.625% Due 7/1/23.
500,000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement 2004 at 101 1/2 AAA Aaa 514,650
Bonds of 1994 (General Obligation Bonds),
6.50% Due 7/1/23.
- ----------- ---------------
$ 3,500,000 $ 3,340,275
- ----------- ---------------
- ----------- ---------------
</TABLE>
See Notes to Schedules of Investments, page 49.
* These Bonds, or a portion thereof, have delivery dates beyond the normal
settlement date. Their expected delivery date is July 29, 1994. Contracts
relating to Bonds with delivery dates after the date of settlement for
purchase made on the Date of Deposit constitute approximately 14% of the
aggregate principal amount of the Trust. (See Section 4.)
48
<PAGE>
NOTES TO SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(1) Contracts, which are "when-issued" or "regular way" contracts or
contracts having delivery dates beyond the normal settlement date, have
been deposited with the Trustee on the Date of Deposit. The performance
of such contracts is secured by an irrevocable letter of credit, issued
by a major commercial bank, which has been deposited with the Trustee.
At the Date of Deposit, Bonds may have been delivered to the Sponsor
pursuant to certain of these contracts; the Sponsor has assigned to the
Trustee all of its right, title and interest in and to such Bonds.
(2) The Bonds are first subject to optional redemption in the years, and at
the prices, shown. Unless otherwise indicated, the Bonds, except for
Bonds issued at a substantial original issue discount, are redeemable at
declining prices (but not below par value) in subsequent years. Original
issue discount bonds, including zero coupon bonds, are generally
redeemable at prices based on the issue price plus the amount of
original issue discount accreted to redemption plus, if applicable, some
premium, the amount of which will decline in subsequent years. The Bonds
may also be subject to sinking fund redemption without premium prior to
the dates shown.
Certain Bonds may be subject to redemption without premium prior to the
date shown pursuant to special or mandatory call provisions; for
example, if bond proceeds are not able to be used as contemplated, the
project is condemned or sold, or the project is destroyed and insurance
proceeds are used to redeem the bonds. Single family mortgage revenue
bonds and housing authority bonds are most likely to be called subject
to such provisions, but other bonds may have similar call features. See
Section 4 and "General Trust Information" in this Section.
The Trustee's determination of the offering prices of Bonds in the Fund
may be greater or less than the amounts that may be received upon
redemption or maturity of such Bonds. Subject to rules concerning
amortization of bond premium and of original issue discount, gain or
loss realized by the Trustee on disposition of any Bonds will be
recognized as taxable capital gain or loss by Unitholders. (See Section
4.)
(3) See "Description of Ratings" herein. All the Bonds in the Insured
Trusts, as insured by the Insurer, are rated AAA by Standard & Poor's
Corporation and Aaa by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. (See Section 5.)
(4) As determined by Kenny S&P Evaluation Services on behalf of the Trustee
as of the close of business on the business day preceding the Date of
Deposit. The prices as determined by Kenny S&P Evaluation Services have
been rounded to the nearest dollar.
49
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF JOHN NUVEEN & CO. INCORPORATED AND
UNITHOLDERS OF NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST, SERIES 739:
We have audited the accompanying statements of condition and the
related schedules of investments at date of deposit (included in the
prospectus herein) of Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust, Series 739
(comprising California Insured Trust 228, Massachusetts Insured Trust
115, New Jersey Insured Trust 177 and Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183),
as of July 14, 1994. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Sponsor. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included
confirmation of the irrevocable letter of credit arrangement for the
purchase of securities, described in Note (1) to the statements of
condition, by correspondence with the Trustee. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by the Sponsor, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the statements of condition and the related
schedules of investments at date of deposit referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of
the trusts constituting the Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust, Series 739
as of July 14, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
Chicago, Illinois,
July 14, 1994.
50
<PAGE>
Statements of Condition
NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST, SERIES 739
(California Insured Trust 228, Massachusetts Insured Trust 115, New Jersey
Insured Trust 177 and Pennsylvania Insured Trust 183)
As of July 14, 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
California Massachusetts New Jersey Pennsylvania
Insured Insured Insured Insured
TRUST PROPERTY Trust 228 Trust 115 Trust 177 Trust 183
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Sponsor's contracts to purchase Tax-
Exempt Bonds, backed by an irrevocable
letter of credit(1)(2)................. $ 3,271,710 $ 3,322,791 $ 3,306,583 $ 3,340,275
Accrued interest to July 14, 1994 on
underlying Bonds(1)................... 30,231 30,224 35,289 31,259
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total....................... $ 3,301,941 $ 3,353,015 $ 3,341,872 $ 3,371,534
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability:
Accrued interest to July 14, 1994 on
underlying Bonds(3)............... $ 30,231 $ 30,224 $ 35,289 $ 31,259
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Interest of Unitholders:
Units of fractional undivided
interest outstanding (California
Insured Trust 228 --35,000;
Massachusetts Insured Trust
115--35,000; New Jersey Insured
Trust 177 --35,000; Pennsylvania
Insured Trust 183--35,000)
Cost to investors(4).............. $ 3,440,268 $ 3,493,981 $ 3,476,938 $ 3,512,366
Less: Gross underwriting
commission(5)................. (168,558) (171,190) (170,355) (172,091)
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net amount applicable to
investors......................... $ 3,271,710 $ 3,322,791 $ 3,306,583 $ 3,340,275
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total....................... $ 3,301,941 $ 3,353,015 $ 3,341,872 $ 3,371,534
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<FN>
(1) Represented by contracts to purchase Tax-Exempt Bonds which include "when issued" or "regular way" or "delayed delivery"
contracts for which an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a major commercial bank has been deposited with the Trustee.
The amount of such letter of credit and any cash deposited exceeds the amount necessary for the purchase of the Bonds plus
accrued interest to the Date of Deposit. At the Date of Deposit, Bonds may have been delivered to the Sponsor pursuant to
certain of these contracts; the Sponsor has assigned to the Trustee all of its rights, title and interest in and to such
Bonds.
(2) Aggregate value (at offering prices) as of the Date of Deposit of the Bonds listed under "Schedules of Investments" herein,
and their aggregate cost to the Trusts are the same. Such offering prices were determined by Kenny S&P Evaluation Services as
of the close of business on the business day prior to the Date of Deposit. (See Section 10.) Insurance coverage providing for
the timely payment, when due, of all principal of and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been obtained by the
Sponsor or by the issuers of such Bonds. Such insurance does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the
Units. Both the bid and the offering prices of the underlying Bonds and of the Units may include value attributable to such
policies of insurance.
(3) Representing, as set forth in Section 8, advancement by the Trustee of an amount equal to the accrued Bond interest as of the
Date of Deposit from the later of the last payment date on the Bonds or the date of issuance thereof.
(4) Aggregate Public Offering Price (exclusive of accrued interest) computed as set forth under Section 6.
(5) The gross underwriting commission has been calculated on the assumption that the Units offered by this prospectus are sold in
single transactions involving less than $50,000 or 500 Units. At this level, the sales charge is 4.90% of the Public Offering
Price in the case of National and State Trusts, 4.25% thereof in the case of Long Intermediate Trusts, 3.90% in the case of
Intermediate Trusts, 3.00% in the case of Short Intermediate Trusts and 2.50% in the case of Short Term Trusts. In single
transactions involving 500 Units or more, the sales charge is reduced. (See Section 6.)
</TABLE>
51
<PAGE>
GENERAL TRUST INFORMATION
An investment in Units of any Trust should be made with an understanding of
the risks that such an investment may entail. As set forth in the portfolio
summaries above, the Trusts may contain or be concentrated in one or more of the
types of bonds discussed below. The following paragraphs discuss certain
circumstances which may adversely affect the ability of issuers of Bonds held in
the portfolio of a Trust to make payment of principal and interest thereon or
which may adversely affect the ratings of such Bonds; with respect to Insured
Trusts, however, because of the insurance obtained by the Sponsor or by the
issuers of the Bonds, such changes should not adversely affect an Insured
Trust's receipt of principal and interest, the Standard & Poor's AAA or Moody's
Aaa ratings of the Bonds in the Insured Trust portfolio, or the Standard &
Poor's AAA rating of the Units of each such Insured Trust.
HEALTH FACILITY OBLIGATIONS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be
obligations of issuers whose revenues are derived from services provided by
hospitals or other health care facilities, including nursing homes. Ratings of
bonds issued for health care facilities are sometimes based on feasibility
studies that contain projections of occupancy levels, revenues and expenses. A
facility's gross receipts and net income available for debt service may be
affected by future events and conditions including, among other things, demand
for services, the ability of the facility to provide the services required, an
increasing shortage of qualified nurses or a dramatic rise in nursing salaries,
physicians' confidence in the facility, management capabilities, economic
developments in the service area, competition from other similar providers,
efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates, legislation
establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, government regulation, the
cost and possible unavailability of malpractice insurance, and the termination
or restriction of governmental financial assistance, including that associated
with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third party payor programs. Medicare
reimbursements are currently calculated on a prospective basis and are not based
on a provider's actual costs. Such method of reimbursement may adversely affect
reimbursements to hospitals and other facilities for services provided under the
Medicare program and thereby may have an adverse effect on the ability of such
institutions to satisfy debt service requirements. In the event of a default
upon a bond secured by hospital facilities, the limited alternative uses for
such facilities may result in the recovery upon such collateral not providing
sufficient funds to fully repay the bonds.
Certain hospital bonds provide for redemption at par upon the damage,
destruction or condemnation of the hospital facilities or in other special
circumstances.
HOUSING OBLIGATIONS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be obligations of
issuers whose revenues are primarily derived from mortgage loans to housing
projects for low to moderate income families. Such issues are generally
characterized by mandatory redemption at par or, in the case of original issue
discount bonds, accreted value in the event of economic defaults and in the
event of a failure of the operator of a project to comply with certain covenants
as to the operation of the project. The failure of such operator to comply with
certain covenants related to the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds,
such as provisions requiring that a specified percentage of units be rented or
available for rental to low or moderate income families, potentially could cause
interest on such Bonds to be subject to Federal income taxation from the date of
issuance of the Bonds. The ability of such issuers to make debt service payments
will be affected by events and conditions affecting financed projects,
including, among other things, the achievement and maintenance of sufficient
occupancy levels and adequate rental income, employment and income conditions
prevailing in local labor markets, increases in taxes, utility costs and other
operating expenses, the managerial ability of project managers, changes in laws
and
A-1
<PAGE>
governmental regulations, the appropriation of subsidies, and social and
economic trends affecting the localities in which the projects are located.
Occupancy of such housing projects may be adversely affected by high rent levels
and income limitations imposed under Federal and state programs.
SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be
single family mortgage revenue bonds, which are issued for the purpose of
acquiring from originating financial institutions notes secured by mortgages on
residences located within the issuer's boundaries and owned by persons of low or
moderate income. Mortgage loans are generally partially or completely prepaid
prior to their final maturities as a result of events such as sale of the
mortgaged premises, default, condemnation or casualty loss. Because these bonds
are subject to extraordinary mandatory redemption in whole or in part from such
prepayments of mortgage loans, a substantial portion of such bonds will probably
be redeemed prior to their scheduled maturities or even prior to their ordinary
call dates. Extraordinary mandatory redemption without premium could also result
from the failure of the originating financial institutions to make mortgage
loans in sufficient amounts within a specified time period. The redemption price
of such issues may be more or less than the offering price of such bonds.
Additionally, unusually high rates of default on the underlying mortgage loans
may reduce revenues available for the payment of principal of or interest on
such mortgage revenue bonds. Single family mortgage revenue bonds issued after
December 31, 1980 were issued under Section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, or Section 143 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which
Sections contain certain requirements relating to the use of the proceeds of
such bonds in order for the interest on such bonds to retain its tax-exempt
status. In each case, the issuer of the bonds has covenanted to comply with
applicable requirements and bond counsel to such issuer has issued an opinion
that the interest on the bonds is exempt from Federal income tax under existing
laws and regulations. There can be no assurance that such continuing
requirements will be satisfied; the failure to meet such requirements could
cause interest on the Bonds to be subject to Federal income taxation, possibly
from the date of issuance of the Bonds.
FEDERALLY ENHANCED OBLIGATIONS. Some of the mortgages which secure the
various health care or housing projects which underlie the previously discussed
Health Facility, Housing, and Single Family Mortgage Revenue Obligations (the
"Obligations") in a Trust may be insured by the Federal Housing Administration
("FHA"). Under FHA regulations, the maximum insurable mortgage amount cannot
exceed 90% of the FHA's estimated value of the project. The FHA mortgage
insurance does not constitute a guarantee of timely payment of the principal of
and interest on the Obligations. Payment of mortgage insurance benefits may be
(1) less than the principal amount of Obligations outstanding or (2) delayed if
disputes arise as to the amount of the payment or if certain notices are not
given to the FHA within the prescribed time periods. In addition, some of the
previously discussed Obligations may be secured by mortgage-backed certificates
guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA"), a wholly
owned corporate instrumentality of the United States, and/or the Federal
National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae") a federally chartered and
stockholder-owed corporation. GNMA and Fannie Mae guarantee timely payment of
principal and interest on the mortgage-backed certificates, even where the
underlying mortgage payments are not made. While such mortgage-backed
certificates are often pledged to secure payment of principal and interest on
the Obligations, timely payment of interest and principal on the Obligations is
not insured or guaranteed by the United States, GNMA, Fannie Mae or any other
governmental agency or instrumentality. The GNMA mortgage-backed certificates
constitute a general obligation of the United States backed by its full faith
and credit. The obligations of Fannie Mae, including its obligations under the
Fannie Mae mortgage-backed securities, are obligations
A-2
<PAGE>
solely of Fannie Mae and are not backed by, or entitled to, the full faith and
credit of the United States.
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE OBLIGATIONS. Certain of the Bonds in a Trust may be
industrial revenue bonds ("IRBs"), including pollution control revenue bonds,
which are tax-exempt securities issued by states, municipalities, public
authorities or similar entities to finance the cost of acquiring, constructing
or improving various industrial projects. These projects are usually operated by
corporate entities. Issuers are obligated only to pay amounts due on the IRBs to
the extent that funds are available from the unexpended proceeds of the IRBs or
receipts or revenues of the issuer under an arrangement between the issuer and
the corporate operator of a project. The arrangement may be in the form of a
lease, installment sale agreement, conditional sale agreement or loan agreement,
but in each case the payments to the issuer are designed to be sufficient to
meet the payments of amounts due on the IRBs. Regardless of the structure,
payment of IRBs is solely dependent upon the creditworthiness of the corporate
operator of the project and, if applicable, corporate guarantor. Corporate
operators or guarantors may be affected by many factors which may have an
adverse impact on the credit quality of the particular company or industry.
These include cyclicality of revenues and earnings, regulatory and environmental
restrictions, litigation resulting from accidents or environmentally-caused
illnesses, extensive competition and financial deterioration resulting from a
corporate restructuring pursuant to a leveraged buy-out, takeover or otherwise.
Such a restructuring may result in the operator of a project becoming highly
leveraged which may have an impact on such operator's creditworthiness which in
turn would have an adverse impact on the rating and/or market value of such
Bonds. Further, the possibility of such a restructuring may have an adverse
impact on the market for and consequently the value of such Bonds, even though
no actual takeover or other action is ever contemplated or effected. The IRBs in
a Trust may be subject to special or extraordinary redemption provisions which
may provide for redemption at par or, in the case of original issue discount
bonds, accreted value. The Sponsor cannot predict the causes or likelihood of
the redemption of IRBs in a Trust prior to the stated maturity of such Bonds.
ELECTRIC UTILITY OBLIGATIONS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be
obligations of issuers whose revenues are primarily derived from the sale of
electric energy. The problems faced by such issuers include the difficulty in
obtaining approval for timely and adequate rate increases from the applicable
public utility commissions, the difficulty of financing large construction
programs, increased competition, reductions in estimates of future demand for
electricity in certain areas of the country, the limitations on operations and
increased costs and delays attributable to environmental considerations, the
difficulty of the capital market in absorbing utility debt, the difficulty in
obtaining fuel at reasonable prices and the effect of energy conservation. All
of such issuers have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying
degrees. In addition, Federal, state and municipal governmental authorities may
from time to time review existing, and impose additional, regulations governing
the licensing, construction and operation of nuclear power plants, which may
adversely affect the ability of the issuers of certain of the Bonds in a Trust
to make payments of principal and/or interest on such Bonds.
TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REVENUE BONDS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be
obligations of issuers which are payable from and secured by revenues derived
from the ownership and operation of airports, public transit systems and ports.
The major portion of an airport's gross operating income is generally derived
from fees received from airlines pursuant to use agreements which consist of
annual payments for airport use, occupancy of certain terminal space, service
fees and leases. Airport operating income may therefore be affected by the
ability of the airlines to meet their obligations under the use agreements. The
air transport industry is experiencing significant variations in earnings and
A-3
<PAGE>
traffic, due to increased competition, excess capacity, increased costs,
deregulation, traffic constraints and other factors, and several airlines are
experiencing severe financial difficulties. In particular, facilities with use
agreements involving airlines experiencing financial difficulty may experience a
reduction in revenue due to the possible inability of these airlines to meet
their use agreement obligations because of such financial difficulties and
possible bankruptcy. The Sponsor cannot predict what effect these industry
conditions may have on airport revenues which are dependent for payment on the
financial condition of the airlines and their usage of the particular airport
facility. Bonds that are secured primarily by the revenue collected by a public
transit system typically are additionally secured by a pledge of sales tax
receipts collected at the state or local level, or of other governmental
financial assistance. Transit system net revenues will be affected by variations
in utilization, which in turn may be affected by the degree of local
governmental subsidization, demographic and population shifts, and competition
from other forms of transportation; and by increased costs, including costs
resulting from previous deferrals of maintenance. Port authorities derive their
revenues primarily from fees imposed on ships using the facilities. The rate of
utilization of such facilities may fluctuate depending on the local economy and
on competition from competing forms of transportation such as air, rail and
trucks.
WATER AND/OR SEWERAGE OBLIGATIONS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be
obligations of issuers whose revenues are derived from the sale of water and/or
sewerage services. Such Bonds are generally payable from user fees. The problems
of such issuers include the ability to obtain timely and adequate rate
increases, population decline resulting in decreased user fees, the difficulty
of financing large construction programs, the limitations on operations and
increased costs and delays attributable to environmental considerations, the
increasing difficulty of obtaining or discovering new supplies of fresh water,
the effect of conservation programs and the impact of "no-growth" zoning
ordinances. All of such issuers have been experiencing certain of these problems
in varying degrees.
UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE REVENUE OBLIGATIONS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust
may be obligations of issuers which are, or which govern the operation of,
colleges and universities and whose revenues are derived mainly from tuition,
dormitory revenues, grants and endowments. General problems of such issuers
include the prospect of a declining percentage of the population consisting of
"college" age individuals, possible inability to raise tuitions and fees
sufficiently to cover increased operating costs, the uncertainty of continued
receipt of Federal grants and state funding, and government legislation or
regulations which may adversely affect the revenues or costs of such issuers.
All of such issuers have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying
degrees.
BRIDGE AUTHORITY AND TOLLROAD OBLIGATIONS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may
be obligations of issuers which derive their payments from bridge, road or
tunnel toll revenues. The revenues of such an issuer could be adversely affected
by competition from toll-free vehicular bridges and roads and alternative modes
of transportation. Such revenues could also be adversely affected by a reduction
in the availability of fuel to motorists or significant increases in the costs
thereof. Specifically, governmental regulations restricting the use of vehicles
in the New York City metropolitan area may adversely affect revenues of the
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority.
DEDICATED-TAX SUPPORTED BONDS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be
obligations of issuers which are payable from and secured by tax revenues from a
designated source, which revenues are pledged to secure the bonds. The various
types of Bonds described below differ in structure and with respect to the
rights of the bondholders to the underlying property. Each type of dedicated-tax
supported Bond has distinct risks, only some of which are set forth below. One
type of dedicated-tax supported Bond is secured by the incremental tax received
on either real property or on sales within a specifically defined
A-4
<PAGE>
geographical area; such tax generally will not provide bondholders with a lien
on the underlying property or revenues. Another type of dedicated-tax supported
Bond is secured by a special tax levied on real property within a defined
geographical area in such a manner that the tax is levied on those who benefit
from the project; such bonds typically provide for a statutory lien on the
underlying property for unpaid taxes. A third type of dedicated-tax supported
Bond may be secured by a tax levied upon the manufacture, sale or consumption of
commodities or upon the license to pursue certain occupations or upon corporate
privileges within a taxing jurisdiction. As to any of these types of Bonds, the
ability of the designated revenues to satisfy the interest and principal
payments on such bonds may be affected by changes in the local economy, the
financial success of the enterprise responsible for the payment of the taxes,
the value of any property on which taxes may be assessed and the ability to
collect such taxes in a timely fashion. Each of these factors will have a
different affect on each distinct type of dedicated-tax supported bonds.
MUNICIPAL LEASE BONDS. Some of the Bonds in a Trust may be obligations that
are secured by lease payments of a governmental entity. Such payments are
normally subject to annual budget appropriations of the leasing governmental
entity. A governmental entity that enters into such a lease agreement cannot
obligate future governments to appropriate for and make lease payments but
covenants to take such action as is necessary to include any lease payments due
in its budgets and to make the appropriations therefor. A governmental entity's
failure to appropriate for and to make payments under its lease obligation could
result in insufficient funds available for payment of the obligations secured
thereby.
ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT BONDS AND STRIPPED OBLIGATIONS. Certain of the
Bonds in a Trust may be original issue discount bonds. These Bonds were issued
with nominal interest rates less than the rates then offered by comparable
securities and as a consequence were originally sold at a discount from their
face, or par, values. This original issue discount, the difference between the
initial purchase price and face value, is deemed under current law to accrue on
a daily basis and the accrued portion is treated as tax-exempt interest income
for federal income tax purposes. On sale or redemption, gain, if any, realized
in excess of the earned portion of original issue discount will be taxable as
capital gain. See "What is the Tax Status of Unitholders". The current value of
an original issue discount bond reflects the present value of its face amount at
maturity. In a stable interest rate environment, the market value of an original
issue discount bond would tend to increase more slowly in early years and in
greater increments as the bond approached maturity.
Certain of the original issue discount bonds in a Trust may be zero coupon
bonds. Zero coupon bonds do not provide for the payment of any current interest;
the buyer receives only the right to receive a final payment of the face amount
of the bond at its maturity. The effect of owning a zero coupon bond is that a
fixed yield is earned not only on the original investment but also, in effect,
on all discount earned during the life of the obligation. This implicit
reinvestment of earnings at the same rate eliminates the risk of being unable to
reinvest the income on such obligation at a rate as high as the implicit yield,
but at the same time also eliminates the holder's ability to reinvest at higher
rates in the future. For this reason, zero coupon bonds are subject to
substantially greater price fluctuations during periods of changing market
interest rates than are securities of comparable quality that pay interest
currently.
Original issue discount bonds, including zero coupon bonds, may be subject
to redemption at prices based on the issue price plus the amount of original
issue discount accreted to redemption (the "accreted value") plus, if
applicable, some premium. Pursuant to such call provisions an original issue
discount bond may be called prior to its maturity date at a price less than its
face value. See the "Schedules of Investments" for more information about the
call provisions of portfolio Bonds.
A-5
<PAGE>
Certain of the Bonds in a Trust may be Stripped Obligations, which represent
evidences of ownership with respect to either the principal amount of or a
payment of interest on a tax-exempt obligation. An obligation is "stripped" by
depositing it with a custodian, which then effects a separation in ownership
between the bond and any interest payment which has not yet become payable, and
issues evidences of ownership with respect to such constituent parts. A Stripped
Obligation therefore has economic characteristics similar to zero coupon bonds,
as described above.
Each Stripped Obligation has been purchased at a discount from the amount
payable at maturity. With respect to each Unitholder, the Internal Revenue Code
treats as "original issue discount" that portion of the discount which produces
a yield to maturity (as of the date of purchase of the Unitholder's Units) equal
to the lower of the coupon rate of interest on the underlying obligation or the
yield to maturity on the basis of the purchase price of the Unitholder's Units
which is allocable to each Stripped Obligation. Original issue discount which
accrues with respect to a Stripped Obligation will be exempt from Federal income
taxation to the same extent as interest on the underlying obligations. (See
Section 11, " What Is The Tax Status of Unitholders".)
Unitholders should consult their own tax advisers with respect to the state
and local tax consequences of owning original issue discount bonds or Stripped
Obligations. Under applicable provisions governing determination of state and
local taxes, interest on original issue discount bonds or Stripped Obligations
may be deemed to be received in the year of accrual even though there is no
corresponding cash payment.
4. COMPOSITION OF TRUSTS
Each Trust initially consists of delivery statements relating to contracts to
purchase Bonds (or of such Bonds) as are listed under "Schedules of Investments"
and, thereafter, of such Bonds as may continue to be held from time to time
(including certain securities deposited in the Trust in substitution for Bonds
not delivered to the Trust or in exchange or substitution for Bonds upon certain
refundings), together with accrued and undistributed interest thereon and
undistributed cash realized from the disposition of Bonds.
"WHEN-ISSUED" AND "DELAYED DELIVERY" TRANSACTIONS. The contracts to
purchase Bonds delivered to the Trustee represent an obligation by issuers or
dealers to deliver Bonds to the Sponsor for deposit in the Trusts. Normally,
"regular way" contracts are settled and the Bonds delivered to the Trustee
within a relatively short period of time. However, certain of the contracts
relate to Bonds which have not been issued as of the Date of Deposit and which
are commonly referred to as "when issued" or "when, as and if issued" Bonds.
Although the Sponsor does not believe it is likely, one or more of the issuers
of such Bonds might decide not to proceed with such offerings. If such Bonds, or
replacement bonds described below, are not acquired by a Trust or if their
delivery is delayed, the Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long Term
Returns shown herein may be reduced. Certain of the contracts for the purchase
of Bonds provide for delivery dates after the date of settlement for purchases
made on the Date of Deposit. Interest on such "when issued" and "delayed
delivery" Bonds accrues to the benefit of Unitholders commencing with the first
settlement date for the Units. However, in the opinion of counsel, Unitholders
who purchase their Units prior to the date such Bonds are actually delivered to
the Trustee must reduce the tax basis of their Units for interest accruing on
such Bonds during the interval between their purchase of Units and the delivery
of the Bonds because such amounts constitute a return of principal. As a result
of such adjustment, the Estimated Current Returns set forth herein (which are
based on the Public Offering Price as of the business day prior to the Date of
Deposit) may be slightly lower than Unitholders will receive after the first
year, assuming the Portfolio does not change
A-6
<PAGE>
and estimated annual expense does not vary from that set forth under "Essential
Information Regarding the Trusts." Those Bonds in each Trust purchased with
delivery dates after the date of settlement for purchases made on the Date of
Deposit are so noted in the Schedules of Investments.
LIMITED REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN BONDS. Neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee
shall be liable in any way for any default, failure or defect in any Bond. In
the event of a failure to deliver any Bond that has been purchased for a Trust
under a contract, including those Bonds purchased on a when, as and if issued
basis ("Failed Bonds"), the Sponsor is authorized under the Indenture to direct
the Trustee to acquire other specified Bonds ("Replacement Bonds") to make up
the original corpus of the Trust. The Replacement Bonds must be purchased within
20 days after delivery of notice of the failed contract and the cost to the
Trust (exclusive of accrued interest) may not exceed the amount of funds
reserved for the purchase of the Failed Bonds. The Replacement Bonds (i) must
satisfy the criteria previously described for Bonds originally included in the
Trust and, with respect to Bonds purchased for a State Trust, shall have the
benefit of an exemption from state taxation of interest to an extent equal to or
greater than that of the Bonds they replace, (ii) must have a fixed maturity
date after the date of purchase of not less than approximately 15 years in the
case of National or State Trusts, approximately 11 years in the case of a Long
Intermediate Trust, approximately 5 years in the case of Intermediate or State
Intermediate Trusts, approximately 3 years in the case of a Short Intermediate
Trust and approximately 1 year in the case of a Short Term Trust, but not later
than the maturity date of the Failed Bonds, (iii) must be acquired at a cost to
the Trust equal to the cost of the same principal amount of Bonds provided in
the failed contract and have a current return and yield to maturity not less
than the current return and yield to maturity of the Failed Bonds and (iv) shall
not be "when, as and if issued" Bonds. Whenever a Replacement Bond has been
acquired for a Trust, the Trustee shall, within five days after the delivery
thereof, mail or deliver a notice of such acquisition to all Unitholders of the
Trust involved. Once the original corpus of the Trust is acquired, the Trustee
will have no power to vary the investment of the Trust; i.e., the Trust will
have no managerial power to take advantage of market variation to improve a
Unitholder's investment.
To the extent the right of limited substitution described in the preceding
paragraph shall not be utilized to acquire Replacement Bonds for the entire
principal amount of Failed Bonds, the Sponsor shall refund to all Unitholders of
the Trust involved the sales charge attributable to such Failed Bonds not
replaced, and the principal and accrued interest attributable to such Bonds
shall be distributed not more than 30 days after the determination of such
failure or at such earlier time as the Trustee in its sole discretion deems to
be in the interest of the Unitholders. Any such accrued interest paid to
Unitholders will be paid by the Sponsor and, accordingly, will not be treated as
tax-exempt income. In the event Failed Bonds in a Trust could not be replaced,
the Net Annual Interest Income per Unit for such Trust would be reduced and the
Estimated Current Return thereon might be lowered.
SALE, MATURITY AND REDEMPTION OF BONDS. Certain of the Bonds may from time
to time under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will mature in
accordance with their terms. The proceeds from such events will be used to pay
for Units redeemed or distributed to Unitholders and not reinvested;
accordingly, no assurance can be given that a Trust will retain for any length
of time its present size and composition.
All of the Bonds in each Trust are subject to being called or redeemed in
whole or in part prior to their stated maturities pursuant to the optional
redemption provisions described in the "Schedules of Investments" and in most
cases pursuant to sinking fund, special or extraordinary redemption provisions.
A bond subject to optional call is one which is subject to redemption or
refunding prior to maturity at the option of the issuer. A
A-7
<PAGE>
refunding is a method by which a bond issue is redeemed, at or before maturity,
by the proceeds of a new bond issue. A bond subject to sinking fund redemption
is one which is subject to partial call from time to time from a fund
accumulated for the scheduled retirement of a portion of an issue prior to
maturity. Special or extraordinary redemption provisions may provide for
redemption of all or a portion of an issue upon the occurrence of certain
circumstances related to defaults or unanticipated changes in circumstances.
Events that may permit or require the special or extraordinary redemption of
bonds include, among others: substantial damage to or destruction of the project
for which the proceeds of the bonds were used; exercise by a local, state or
federal governmental unit of its power of eminent domain to take all or
substantially all of the project for which the proceeds of the bonds were used;
a final determination that the interest on the bonds is taxable; changes in the
economic availability of raw materials, operating supplies or facilities or
technological or other changes which render the operation of the project for
which the proceeds of the bonds were used uneconomical; changes in law or an
administrative or judicial decree which render the performance of the agreement
under which the proceeds of the bonds were made available to finance the project
impossible or which create unreasonable burdens or which impose excessive
liabilities, such as taxes, not imposed on the date the bonds are issued on the
issuer of the bonds or the user of the proceeds of the bonds; an administrative
or judicial decree which requires the cessation of a substantial part of the
operations of the project financed with the proceeds of the bonds; an
overestimate of the costs of the project to be financed with the proceeds of the
bonds resulting in excess proceeds which may be applied to redeem bonds; or an
underestimate of a source of funds securing the bonds resulting in excess funds
which may be applied to redeem bonds. The Sponsor is unable to predict all of
the circumstances which may result in such redemption of an issue of Bonds. See
the discussion of the various types of bond issues, above, for information on
the call provisions of such bonds, particularly single family mortgage revenue
bonds.
The exercise of redemption or call provisions will (except to the extent the
proceeds of the called Bonds are used to pay for Unit redemptions) result in the
distribution of principal and may result in a reduction in the amount of
subsequent interest distributions; it may also affect the current return on
Units of the Trust involved. Redemption pursuant to optional call provisions is
more likely to occur, and redemption pursuant to sinking fund or special or
extraordinary redemption provisions may occur, when the Bonds have an offering
side evaluation which represents a premium over par. Redemption pursuant to
optional call provisions may be, and redemption pursuant to sinking fund or
special or extraordinary redemption provisions is likely to be, at a price equal
to the par value of the bonds without any premium (in the case of original issue
discount bonds, such redemption is generally to be made at the issue price plus
the amount of original issue discount accreted to the date of redemption; such
price is referred to herein as "accreted value"). Because Bonds may have been
valued at prices above or below par value or the then current accreted value at
the time Units were purchased, Unitholders may realize gain or loss upon the
redemption of portfolio Bonds. (See Sections 11 and 13 and the "Schedules of
Investments.")
CERTAIN TAX MATTERS; LITIGATION. Certain of the Bonds in each Trust
portfolio may be subject to continuing requirements such as the actual use of
bond proceeds, manner of operation of the project financed from bond proceeds or
rebate of excess earnings on bond proceeds that may affect the exemption of
interest on such Bonds from Federal income taxation. Although at the time of
issuance of each of the Bonds in each Trust an opinion of bond counsel was
rendered as to the exemption of interest on such obligations from Federal income
taxation, and the issuers covenanted to comply with all requirements necessary
to retain the tax-exempt status of the Bonds, there can be no assurance that the
A-8
<PAGE>
respective issuers or other obligors on such obligations will fulfill the
various continuing requirements established upon issuance of the Bonds. A
failure to comply with such requirements may cause a determination that interest
on such obligations is subject to Federal income taxation, perhaps even
retroactively from the date of issuance of such Bonds, thereby reducing the
value of the Bonds and subjecting Unitholders to unanticipated tax liabilities.
To the best knowledge of the Sponsor, there is no litigation pending as of
the Date of Deposit in respect of any Bonds which might reasonably be expected
to have a material adverse effect on any of the Trusts. It is possible that
after the Date of Deposit, litigation may be initiated with respect to Bonds in
any Trust. Any such litigation may affect the validity of such Bonds or the
tax-exempt nature of the interest thereon, but while the outcome of litigation
of such nature can never be entirely predicted, the opinions of bond counsel to
the issuer of each Bond on the date of issuance state that such Bonds were
validly issued and that the interest thereon is, to the extent indicated, exempt
from Federal income tax.
5. WHY AND HOW ARE THE BONDS INSURED?
INSURANCE ON BONDS IN INSURED TRUSTS
Insurance guaranteeing the timely payment, when due, of all principal and
interest on the Bonds in each Insured Trust has been obtained by the Sponsor or
by the issuers or underwriters of Bonds from the Municipal Bond Investors
Assurance Corporation (the "Insurer"). Some of the Bonds in each Insured Trust
may be covered by a policy or policies of insurance obtained by the issuers or
underwriters of the Bonds from Municipal Bond Insurance Association (the
"Association") or Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance Company ("BIG"). The Insurer
has issued a policy or policies of insurance covering each of the Bonds in the
Insured Trusts, each policy to remain in force until the payment in full of such
Bonds and whether or not the Bonds continue to be held by an Insured Trust. By
the terms of each policy the Insurer will unconditionally guarantee to the
holders or owners of the Bonds the payment, when due, required of the issuer of
the Bonds of an amount equal to the principal of and interest on the Bonds as
such payments shall become due but not be paid (except that in the event of any
acceleration of the due date of principal by reason of mandatory or optional
redemption, default or otherwise, the payments guaranteed will be made in such
amounts and at such times as would have been due had there not been an
acceleration). The Insurer will be responsible for such payments, less any
amounts received by the holders or owners of the Bonds from any trustee for the
bond issuers or from any other sources other than the Insurer. The Insurer's
policies relating to small industrial development bonds and pollution control
revenue bonds also guarantee the full and complete payments required to be made
by or on behalf of an issuer of Bonds pursuant to the terms of the Bonds if
there occurs an event which results in the loss of the tax-exempt status of the
interest on such Bonds, including principal, interest or premium payments, if
any, as and when thereby required. The Insurer has indicated that its insurance
policies do not insure the payment of principal or interest on bonds which are
not required to be paid by the issuer thereof because the bonds were not validly
issued; as indicated under "What is the Tax Status of Unitholders?" the
respective issuing authorities have received opinions of bond counsel relating
to the valid issuance of each of the Bonds in the Insured Trusts. The Insurer's
policy also does not insure against non-payment of principal of or interest on
the Bonds resulting from the insolvency, negligence or any other act or omission
of the trustee or other paying agent for the Bonds. The policy is not covered by
the Property/ Casualty Insurance Security Fund specified in Article 76 of the
New York Insurance Law. The policies are non-cancellable and the insurance
premiums have been fully paid on or
A-9
<PAGE>
prior to the Date of Deposit, either by the Sponsor or, if a policy has been
obtained by a Bond issuer, by such issuer.
Upon notification from the trustee for any bond issuer or any holder or
owner of the Bonds or coupons that such trustee or paying agent has insufficient
funds to pay any principal or interest in full when due, the Insurer will be
obligated to deposit funds promptly with State Street Bank and Trust Company,
N.A., New York, New York, as fiscal agent for the Insurer, sufficient to fully
cover the deficit. If notice of nonpayment is received on or after the due date,
the Insurer will provide for payment within one business day following receipt
of the notice. Upon payment by the Insurer of any Bonds, coupons, or interest
payments, the Insurer shall succeed to the rights of the owner of such Bonds,
coupons or interest payments with respect thereto.
The Insurer is the principal operating subsidiary of MBIA, Inc., a New York
Stock Exchange listed company. MBIA, Inc. is not obligated to pay the debts of
or claims against the Insurer. The Insurer is a limited liability corporation
rather than a several liability association. The Insurer is domiciled in the
State of New York and licensed to do business in all 50 states, the District of
Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
As of December 31, 1993 the Insurer had admitted assets of $3.1 billion
(audited), total liabilities of $2.1 billion (audited), and total capital and
surplus of $978 million (audited) determined in accordance with statutory
accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory
authorities. As of March 31, 1994, the Insurer had admitted assets of $3.2
billion (unaudited), total liabilities of $2.2 billion (unaudited), and total
capital and surplus of $998 million (unaudited) determined in accordance with
statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory
authorities. Copies of the Insurer's year end financial statements prepared in
accordance with statutory accounting practices are available from the Insurer.
The address of the Insurer is 113 King Street, Armonk, New York 10504.
Each insurance company comprising the Association will be severally and not
jointly obligated under the Association policy in the following respective
percentages: The AEtna Casualty and Surety Company, 33%; Fireman's Fund
Insurance Company, 30%; The Travelers Indemnity Company, 15%; AEtna Insurance
Company (now known as CIGNA Property and Casualty Company), 12%; and The
Continental Insurance Company, 10%. As a several obligor, each such insurance
company will be obligated only to the extent of its percentage of any claim
under the Association policy and will not be obligated to pay any unpaid
obligation of any other member of the Association. Each insurance company's
participation is backed by all of its assets. However, each insurance company is
a multiline insurer involved in several lines of insurance other than municipal
bond insurance, and the assets of each insurance company also secure all of its
other insurance policy and surety bond obligations.
The following table sets forth certain unaudited financial information with
respect to the five insurance companies comprising the Association. The
statistics, which have been furnished by the Association, are as reported by the
insurance companies to the New York State Insurance Department and are
determined in accordance with statutory accounting principles. No representation
is made herein as to the accuracy or adequacy of such information or as to the
absence of material adverse changes in such information subsequent to the date
thereof. In addition, these numbers are subject to revision by the New York
State Insurance Department which, if revised, could either increase or decrease
the amounts.
A-10
<PAGE>
MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE ASSOCIATION
FIVE MEMBER COMPANIES ASSETS AND POLICYHOLDERS' SURPLUS
AS OF JUNE 30, 1993.
(000's omitted)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
New York New York New York
Statutory Statutory Policyholders'
Assets Liabilities Surplus
--------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
The AEtna Casualty & Surety Company..................... $ 10,175,369 $ 8,227,944 $ 1,947,425
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company........................ 6,700,072 4,798,256 1,901,816
The Travelers Indemnity Company......................... 10,331,197 8,368,954 1,962,243
CIGNA Property and Casualty Company (formerly AEtna
Insurance Company).................................... 5,091,798 4,984,297 107,501
The Continental Insurance Company....................... 2,719,853 2,287,014 432,839
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Total........................................... $ 35,018,289 $ 28,666,465 $ 6,351,824
--------------- --------------- ---------------
--------------- --------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
Standard & Poor's Corporation rates all new issues insured by the
Association "AAA" Prime Grade.
Moody's Investors Service rates all bond issues insured by the Association
"Aaa" and short term loans "MIG 1", both designated to be of the highest
quality.
Each such rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. No
application has been made to any other rating agency in order to obtain
additional ratings on the Bonds. The ratings reflect the respective rating
agency's current assessment of the creditworthiness of the Association and its
ability to pay claims on its policies of insurance. Any further explanation as
to the significance of the above ratings may be obtained only from the
applicable rating agency.
Moody's Investors Service rates all bond issues insured by the Insurer "Aaa"
and short-term loans "MIG 1," both designated to be of the highest quality.
Standard & Poor's Ratings Group, a division of McGraw Hill ("Standard &
Poor's") rates all new issues insured by the Insurer "AAA" Prime Grade."
The Moody's Investors Service rating of the Insurer should be evaluated
independently of the Standard & Poor's Corporation rating of the Insurer. No
application has been made to any other rating agency in order to obtain
additional ratings on the Bonds. The ratings reflect the respective rating
agency's current assessment of the creditworthiness of the Insurer and its
ability to pay claims on its policies of insurance (See "Description of
Ratings.") Any further explanation as to the significance of the above ratings
may be obtained only from the applicable rating agency.
The above ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Bonds,
and such ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the
rating agencies. Any downward revision or withdrawal of either or both ratings
may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds.
Because the insurance on the Bonds will be effective so long as the Bonds
are outstanding, such insurance will be taken into account in determining the
market value of the Bonds and therefore some value attributable to such
insurance will be included in the value of the Units of the Insured Trusts. The
insurance does not, however, guarantee the market value of the Bonds or of the
Units.
A-11
<PAGE>
INSURANCE ON CERTAIN BONDS IN TRADITIONAL TRUSTS
Insurance guaranteeing the timely payment, when due, of all principal and
interest on certain Bonds in a Traditional Trust may have been obtained by the
Sponsor, issuer or underwriter of the particular Bonds involved or by another
party. Such insurance, which provides coverage substantially the same as that
obtained with respect to Bonds in Insured Trusts as described above, is
effective so long as the insured Bond is outstanding and the insurer remains in
business. Insurance relates only to the particular Bond and not to the Units
offered hereby or to their market value. Insured Bonds have received a rating of
"Aaa" by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or "AAA" by Standard & Poor's
Corporation in recognition of such insurance.
If a Bond in a Traditional Trust is insured, the Schedule of Investments
will identify the insurer. Such insurance will be provided by Financial Guaranty
Insurance Company ("FGIC"), AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC"), Bond
Investors Guaranty Insurance Company, now known as MBIA Corp. of Illinois
("BIG"), Capital Guaranty Insurance Company ("CGIC"), Financial Security
Assurance, Inc. ("FSA"), Municipal Bond Insurance Association (the
"Association"), Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation ("MBIA") or
Connie Lee Insurance Company ("ConnieLee"). The Sponsor to date has purchased
and presently intends to purchase insurance for Bonds in Traditional Trusts
exclusively from MBIA (see the preceding disclosure regarding MBIA). There can
be no assurance that any insurer listed therein will be able to satisfy its
commitments in the event claims are made in the future. However, Standard &
Poor's Corporation has rated the claims-paying ability of each insurer "AAA,"
and Moody's Investors Service has rated all bonds insured by each such insurer,
except ConnieLee, "Aaa." Moody's Investor's Service gives no ratings for bonds
insured by ConnieLee.
Because any such insurance will be effective so long as the insured Bonds
are outstanding, such insurance will be taken into account in determining the
market value of such Bonds and therefore some value attributable to such
insurance will be included in the value of the Units of the Trust that includes
such Bonds. The insurance does not, however, guarantee the market value of the
Bonds or of the Units.
6. HOW IS THE PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE DETERMINED?
The Public Offering Price of the Units of each Trust is equal to the Trustee's
determination of the aggregate OFFERING prices of the Bonds deposited therein
(minus any advancement to the principal account of the Trust made by the
Trustee) plus a sales charge of 5.152% of the aggregate offering prices in the
case of National and State Trusts, 4.439% of the aggregate offering prices in
the case of Long Intermediate Trusts, 4.058% of the aggregate offering prices in
the case of Intermediate Trusts, 3.093% of the aggregate offering prices in the
case of Short Intermediate Trusts and 2.564% of the aggregate offering prices in
the case of Short Term Trusts, in each case adding to the total thereof cash
held by the Trust, if any, and dividing the sum so obtained by the number of
Units outstanding in the Trust. This computation produces a gross underwriting
profit equal to 4.90% of the Public Offering Price in the case of National and
State Trusts, 4.25% of the Public Offering Price in the case of Long
Intermediate Trusts, 3.90% of the Public Offering Price in the case of
Intermediate Trusts, 3.00% of the Public Offering Price in the case of Short
Intermediate Trusts and 2.50% of the Public Offering Price in the case of Short
Term Trusts.
The sales charge applicable to quantity purchases is reduced on a graduated
scale for sales to any purchaser of at least $50,000 or 500 Units and will be
applied on whichever basis is more favorable to the purchaser. For purposes of
calculating the applicable sales charge, purchasers who have indicated their
intent to purchase a specified amount of Units of any Trust described herein in
the primary offering period or units of any other series of Nuveen Tax-Exempt
Unit Trusts in the primary offering period by executing and delivering a letter
of intent to the Sponsor, which letter of intent must be in a form acceptable to
the
A-12
<PAGE>
Sponsor and shall have a maximum duration of thirteen months, will be eligible
to receive a reduced sales charge according to the following table based on the
amount of intended aggregate purchases as expressed in the letter of intent. By
establishing a letter of intent, a Unitholder agrees that the first purchase of
Units following the execution of such letter of intent will be at least 5% of
the total amount of the intended aggregate purchases expressed in such
Unitholder's letter of intent. Further, through the establishment of the letter
of intent, such Unitholder agrees that units representing 5% of the total amount
of the intended purchases will be held in escrow by United States Trust Company
of New York pending completion of these purchases. All distributions on units
held in escrow will be credited to such Unitholder's account. If total purchases
prior to the expiration of the letter of intent period equal or exceed the
amount specified in a Unitholder's letter of intent, the units held in escrow
will be transferred to such Unitholder's account. If the total purchases are
less than the amount specified, the Unitholder involved must pay the Sponsor an
amount equal to the difference between the amounts paid for these purchases and
the amounts which would have been paid if the higher sales charge had been
applied. If such Unitholder does not pay the additional amount within 20 days
after written request by the Sponsor or the Unitholder's securities
representative, the Sponsor will instruct the Trustee to redeem an appropriate
number of the escrowed units to meet the required payment. By establishing a
letter of intent, a Unitholder irrevocably appoints the Sponsor as attorney to
give instructions to redeem any or all of such Unitholder's escrowed units, with
full power of substitution in the premises. A Unitholder or his securities
representative must notify the Sponsor whenever such Unitholder makes a purchase
of Units that he wishes to be counted towards the intended amount. Sales charges
during the primary offering period are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
National and State Long Intermediate Trusts
Trusts Intermediate Trusts
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
of of Net of of Net of of Net
Offering Amount Offering Amount Offering Amount
Number of Units* Price Invested Price Invested Price Invested
- ----------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Less than 500........................................ 4.90% 5.152% 4.25% 4.439% 3.90% 4.058%
500 but less than 1,000.............................. 4.75 4.987 4.15 4.330 3.70 3.842
1,000 but less than 2,500............................ 4.50 4.712 3.85 4.004 3.50 3.627
2,500 but less than 5,000............................ 4.25 4.439 3.60 3.734 3.25 3.359
5,000 but less than 10,000........................... 3.50 3.627 3.35 3.466 3.00 3.093
10,000 but less than 25,000.......................... 3.00 3.093 3.00 3.093 2.75 2.828
25,000 but less than 50,000.......................... 2.50 2.564 2.50 2.564 2.50 2.564
50,000 or more....................................... 2.00 2.041 2.00 2.041 2.00 2.041
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Short Intermediate
Trusts Short Term Trusts
------------------------ ------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Percent Percent Percent Percent
of of Net of of Net
Offering Amount Offering Amount
Number of Units* Price Invested Price Invested
- ----------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Less than 500........................................ 3.00% 3.093% 2.50% 2.564%
500 but less than 1,000.............................. 2.80 2.881 2.30 2.354
1,000 but less than 2,500............................ 2.60 2.670 2.10 2.145
2,500 but less than 5,000............................ 2.35 2.407 1.85 1.885
5,000 but less than 10,000........................... 2.10 2.145 1.60 1.626
10,000 but less than 25,000.......................... 1.85 1.885 1.35 1.368
25,000 but less than 50,000.......................... 1.80 1.833 1.25 1.266
50,000 or more....................................... 1.50 1.523 1.15 1.163
</TABLE>
*Breakpoint sales charges are computed both on a dollar basis and on the basis
of the number of Units purchased, using the equivalent of 500 Units to $50,000,
2,500 Units to $250,000 etc., and will be applied on that basis which is more
favorable to the purchaser.
For "secondary market" sales the Public Offering Price per Unit of each
Trust is determined by adding to the Trustee's determination of the BID price of
each Bond in the Trust a sales charge determined in accordance with the table
set forth below based upon the number of years remaining to the maturity of each
such Bond, adjusting the total to reflect the amount of any cash held in or
advanced to the principal account of the Trust
A-13
<PAGE>
and dividing the result by the number of Units then outstanding. For purposes of
this calculation, Bonds will be deemed to mature on their stated maturity dates
unless: (a) the Bonds have been called for redemption or funds or securities
have been placed in escrow to redeem them on an earlier call date, in which case
such call date shall be deemed to be the date upon which they mature; or (b)
such Bonds are subject to a "mandatory put," in which case such mandatory put
date shall be deemed to be the date upon which they mature.
Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, the Trustee may terminate a Trust if
the net asset value of such Trust, as shown by any evaluation, is less than 20%
of the original principal amount of the Trust. In the course of regularly
appraising the value of Bonds in each Trust, the Sponsor will attempt to
estimate the date on which a Trust's value will fall below the 20% level based
on anticipated bond events over a five year period, including maturities, escrow
calls and current calls or refundings, assuming certain market rates. The
Sponsor intends from time to time to recommend that certain Trusts whose values
have fallen or are anticipated to fall below the 20% level be terminated based
on certain criteria which could adversely affect the Trust's diversification.
Once the Sponsor has determined that a Trust's value has or may fall below the
20% level within a five-year period, for purposes of computing the sales charge
using the table set forth below, the maturity of each bond in such Trust will be
deemed to be the earlier of the estimated termination date of the Trust, or the
actual date used when pricing the bond under Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board rules and interpretations issued thereunder.
The effect of this method of sales charge calculation will be that different
sales charge rates will be applied to the various Bonds in a Trust portfolio
based upon the maturities of such Bonds, in accordance with the following
schedule. As shown, the sales charge on Bonds in each maturity range (and
therefore the aggregate sales charge on the purchase) is reduced with respect to
purchases of at least $50,000 or 500 Units:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount of Purchase*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$50,000 $100,000 $250,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $2,500,000
Under to to to to to to
Years to Maturity $50,000 $99,999 $249,999 $499,999 $999,999 $2,499,999 $4,999,999
- --------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------
Less than 1................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 but less than 2.......... 1.523% 1.446% 1.369% 1.317% 1.215% 1.061% .900%
2 but less than 3.......... 2.041 1.937 1.833 1.729 1.626 1.420 1.225
3 but less than 4.......... 2.564 2.433 2.302 2.175 2.041 1.781 1.546
4 but less than 5.......... 3.093 2.961 2.828 2.617 2.459 2.175 1.883
5 but less than 7.......... 3.627 3.433 3.239 3.093 2.881 2.460 2.165
7 but less than 10......... 4.167 3.951 3.734 3.520 3.239 2.828 2.489
10 but less than 13........ 4.712 4.467 4.221 4.004 3.788 3.253 2.842
13 but less than 16........ 5.263 4.988 4.712 4.439 4.167 3.627 3.169
16 or more................. 5.820 5.542 5.263 4.987 4.603 4.004 3.500
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
$5,000,000
Years to Maturity or more
- --------------------------- -------------
Less than 1................ 0
1 but less than 2.......... .750%
2 but less than 3.......... 1.030
3 but less than 4.......... 1.310
4 but less than 5.......... 1.590
5 but less than 7.......... 1.870
7 but less than 10......... 2.150
10 but less than 13........ 2.430
13 but less than 16........ 2.710
16 or more................. 3.000
</TABLE>
*Breakpoint sales charges are computed both on a dollar basis and on the basis
of the number of Units purchased, using the equivalent of 500 Units to
$50,000, 2,500 Units to $250,000, etc., and will be applied on that basis
which is more favorable to the purchaser.
The secondary market sales charges above are expressed as a percent of the
net amount invested; expressed as a percent of the Public Offering Price, the
maximum sales charge on any Trust, including one consisting entirely of Bonds
with 16 years or more to maturity, would be 5.50% (5.820% of the net amount
invested). For purposes of illustration, the sales charge on a Trust consisting
entirely of Bonds maturing in 13 to 16 years would be 5% (5.263% of the net
amount invested); that on a Trust consisting entirely of Bonds maturing in five
to seven years would be 3.5% (3.627% of the net amount invested); and that on a
Trust consisting entirely of Bonds maturing in three to four years would be 2.5%
(2.564% of the net amount invested). The actual secondary market sales charge
included in the Public Offering Price of any particular Trust will depend on the
maturities of the Bonds in the portfolio of such Trust.
A-14
<PAGE>
At all times while Units are being offered for sale, the Sponsor will
appraise or cause to be appraised daily the value of the underlying Bonds in
each Trust as of 4:00 p.m. eastern time on each day on which the New York Stock
Exchange (the "Exchange") is normally open and will adjust the Public Offering
Price of the Units commensurate with such appraisal. Such Public Offering Price
will be effective for all orders received by a dealer or the Sponsor at or prior
to 4:00 p.m. eastern time on each such day. Orders received after that time, or
on a day when the Exchange is closed for a scheduled holiday or weekend, will be
held until the next determination of price.
As more fully set forth in Section 8, accrued interest from the preceding
Record Date to, but not including, the settlement date of the transaction (five
business days after purchase) will be added to the Public Offering Price to
determine the purchase price of Units.
The above graduated sales charges will apply on all purchases of Nuveen
investment company securities on any one day by the same purchaser in the
amounts stated, and for this purpose purchases of this Series will be aggregated
with concurrent purchases of any other Series or of shares of any open-end
management investment company of which the Sponsor is principal underwriter and
with respect to the purchase of which a sales charge is imposed.
Purchases by or for the account of an individual and his or her spouse and
children under 21 years of age will be aggregated to determine the applicable
sales charge. The graduated sales charges are also applicable to a trustee or
other fiduciary purchasing securities for a single trust estate or single
fiduciary account.
Units may be purchased at the Public Offering Price without a sales charge
by officers or directors and by bona fide, full-time employees of Nuveen, Nuveen
Advisory Corp., Nuveen Institutional Advisory Corp. and The John Nuveen Company,
including in each case these individuals and their immediate family members (as
defined above).
The initial or primary Public Offering Price of the Units in each Trust is
based upon a pro rata share of the OFFERING prices per Unit of the Bonds in such
Trust plus the applicable sales charge. The secondary market Public Offering
Price of each Trust is based upon a pro rata share of the BID prices per Unit of
the Bonds in such Trust plus the applicable sales charge. The OFFERING prices of
Bonds in a Trust may be expected to average approximately 1% to 2% more than the
BID prices of such Bonds in the case of National, Long Intermediate and State
Trusts, 3/4% to 1 1/2% in the case of Intermediate and Short Intermediate
Trusts, and 1/2% to 3/4% in the case of Short Term Trusts. The difference
between the bid side evaluation and the offering side evaluation of the Bonds in
each Trust on the business day prior to the Date of Deposit is shown in the
discussion of each Trust portfolio.
Whether or not Units are being offered for sale, the Sponsor will determine
the aggregate value of each Trust as of 4:00 p.m. eastern time: (i) on each June
30 or December 31 (or, if such date is not a business day, the last business day
prior thereto), (ii) on any day on which a Unit is tendered for redemption (or
the next succeeding business day if the date of tender is a non-business day)
and (iii) at such other times as may be necessary. For this purpose, a "business
day" shall be any day on which the Exchange is normally open. (See Section 16.)
7. MARKET FOR UNITS
During the initial public offering period, the Sponsor intends to offer to
purchase Units of each Trust at a price equivalent to the pro rata share per
Unit of the OFFERING prices of the Bonds in such Trust (plus accrued interest).
Afterward, although it is not obligated to do so, the Sponsor intends to
maintain a secondary market for Units of each Trust at its own expense and
continuously to offer to purchase Units of each Trust at prices, subject to
A-15
<PAGE>
change at any time, which are based upon the BID prices of Bonds in the
respective portfolios of the Trusts. If the supply of Units of any of the Trusts
of this Series exceeds demand, or for some other business reason, the Sponsor
may discontinue purchases of Units of such Trust at such prices. UNITHOLDERS WHO
WISH TO DISPOSE OF THEIR UNITS SHOULD INQUIRE OF THE TRUSTEE OR THEIR BROKER AS
TO THE CURRENT REDEMPTION PRICE (SEE SECTION 19). In connection with its
secondary marketmaking activities, the Sponsor may from time to time enter into
secondary market joint account agreements with other brokers and dealers.
Pursuant to such an agreement the Sponsor will purchase Units from the broker or
dealer at the bid price and will place the Units into a joint account managed by
the Sponsor; sales from the account will be made in accordance with the then
current prospectus and the Sponsor and the broker or dealer will share profits
and losses in the joint account in accordance with the terms of their joint
account agreement.
Certificates, if any, for Units are delivered to the purchaser as promptly
after the date of settlement (five business days after purchase) as the Trustee
can complete the mechanics of registration. Normally, Certificates, if any, are
mailed by the Trustee within 48 hours after registration instructions are
received. Purchasers of Units to whom Certificates are issued will be unable to
exercise any right of redemption until they have received their Certificates as
tender of the Certificate, properly endorsed for transfer. (See Section 19.)
Each Unit of each respective Trust initially offered by this Prospectus
represents that fractional undivided interest in such Trust as is set forth
under "Essential Information Regarding the Trusts." To the extent that any Units
of any Trust are redeemed by the Trustee, the aggregate value of the Trust's
assets will decrease by the amount paid to the redeeming Unitholder, but the
fractional undivided interest of each unredeemed Unit in such Trust will
increase proportionately. The Sponsor will initially, and from time to time
thereafter, hold Units in connection with their offering.
8. WHAT IS ACCRUED INTEREST?
Accrued interest is the accumulation of unpaid interest on a bond from the last
day on which interest thereon was paid. Interest on Bonds in each Trust is
accounted for daily on an accrual basis. For this reason, the purchase price of
Units of a Trust will include not only the Public Offering Price but also the
proportionate share of accrued interest to the date of settlement. Interest
accrues to the benefit of Unitholders commencing with the settlement date of
their purchase transaction.
Accrued interest does not include accrual of original issue discount on zero
coupon bonds, Stripped Obligations or other original issue discount bonds. (See
"Summary of Portfolios--General Trust Information" and "What Is The Tax Status
of Unitholders.")
In an effort to reduce the amount of accrued interest that investors would
have to pay in addition to the Public Offering Price, the Trustee has agreed to
advance to each Trust the amount of accrued interest due on the Bonds as of the
Date of Deposit (which has been designated the first Record Date for all plans
of distribution). This accrued interest will be paid to the Sponsor as the
holder of record of all Units on the Date of Deposit. Consequently, when the
Sponsor sells Units of a Trust, the amount of accrued interest to be added to
the Public Offering Price to determine the purchase price of the Units of such
Trust purchased by an investor will include only accrued interest from the Date
of Deposit to, but not including, the date of settlement of the investor's
purchase (five business days after purchase), less any distributions from the
related Interest Account. The Trustee will recover its advancements (without
interest or other cost to the Trusts) from interest received on the Bonds
deposited in each Trust.
The Trustee has no cash for distribution to Unitholders until it receives
interest payments on the Bonds in the Trusts. Since municipal bond interest is
accrued daily but
A-16
<PAGE>
paid only semi-annually, during the initial months of the Trusts, the Interest
Accounts, consisting of accrued but uncollected interest and collected interest
(cash), will be predominantly the uncollected accrued interest that is not
available for distribution. However, due to advances by the Trustee, the Trustee
will provide a first distribution between approximately 30 and 60 days after the
Date of Deposit. Assuming each Trust retains its original size and composition
and expenses and fees remain the same, annual interest collected and distributed
will approximate the estimated Net Annual Interest Income stated herein.
However, the amount of accrued interest at any point in time will be greater
than the amount that the Trustee will have actually received and distributed to
the Unitholders. Therefore, there will always remain an item of accrued interest
that is included in the Purchase Price and the redemption price of the Units.
Interest is accounted for daily and a proportionate share of accrued and
undistributed interest computed from the preceding Record Date is added to the
daily valuation of each Unit of each Trust. (See Sections 3 and 13.) As Bonds
mature, or are redeemed or sold, the accrued interest applicable to such bonds
is collected and subsequently distributed to Unitholders. Unitholders who sell
or redeem all or a portion of their Units will be paid their proportionate share
of the remaining accrued interest to, but not including, the fifth business day
following the date of sale or tender.
9. WHAT ARE ESTIMATED LONG TERM RETURN AND ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN?
The Estimated Long Term Return for each Trust is a measure of the return to the
investor earned over the estimated life of the Trust. The Estimated Long Term
Return represents an average of the yields to maturity (or call) of the Bonds in
the Trust's portfolio calculated in accordance with accepted bond practice and
adjusted to reflect expenses and sales charges. Under accepted bond practice,
tax-exempt bonds are customarily offered to investors on a "yield price" basis,
which involves computation of yield to maturity or to an earlier call date
(whichever produces the lower yield), and which takes into account not only the
interest payable on the bonds but also the amortization or accretion to a
specified date of any premium over or discount from the par (maturity) value in
the bond's purchase price. In calculating Estimated Long Term Return, the
average yield for the Trust's portfolio is derived by weighting each Bond's
yield by the market value of the Bond and by the amount of time remaining to the
date to which the Bond is priced. Once the average portfolio yield is computed,
this figure is then reduced to reflect estimated expenses and the effect of the
maximum sales charge paid by investors. The Estimated Long Term Return
calculation does not take into account the effect of a first distribution which
may be less than a regular distribution or may be paid at some point after 30
days (or a second distribution which may be less than a normal distribution for
Unitholders who choose quarterly or semi-annual plans of distribution), and it
also does not take into account the difference in timing of payments to
Unitholders who choose quarterly or semi-annual plans of distribution, each of
which will reduce the return.
Estimated Current Return is computed by dividing the Net Annual Interest
Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. In contrast to Estimated Long Term
Return, Estimated Current Return does not reflect the amortization of premium or
accretion of discount, if any, on the Bonds in the Trust's portfolio. Net Annual
Interest Income per Unit is calculated by dividing the annual interest income to
the Trust, less estimated expenses, by the number of Units outstanding.
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit, used to calculate Estimated Current
Return, will vary with changes in fees and expenses of the Trustee and the
Evaluator and with the redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Bonds. A Trust
may experience expenses and portfolio changes different from those assumed in
the calculation of Estimated Long Term
A-17
<PAGE>
Return. There thus can be no assurance that the Estimated Current Returns or
Estimated Long Term Returns quoted herein will be realized in the future. Since
both the Estimated Current Return and the Estimated Long Term Return quoted
herein are based on the market value of the underlying Bonds on the business day
prior to the Date of Deposit, subsequent calculations of these performance
measures will reflect the then current market value of the underlying Bonds and
may be higher or lower.
A portion of the monies received by a Trust may be treated, in the first
year only, as a return of principal due to the inclusion in the Trust portfolio
of "when-issued" or other Bonds having delivery dates after the date of
settlement for purchases made on the Date of Deposit. A consequence of this
treatment is that in the computation of Estimated Current Return for the first
year, such monies are excluded from Net Annual Interest Income and treated as an
adjustment to the Public Offering Price. (See "Essential Information Regarding
the Trusts" and Sections 4 and 11.)
For a statement of the Net Annual Interest Income per Unit under the monthly
plan of distribution, and Estimated Long Term Yield and Estimated Current
Returns based on the Public Offering Prices of the Trusts in this Series, all as
of the day prior to the Date of Deposit, see "Essential Information Regarding
the Trusts."
10. HOW WAS THE PRICE OF THE BONDS DETERMINED AT THE DATE OF DEPOSIT?
The prices at which the Bonds deposited in the Trusts would have been offered to
the public on the business day prior to the Date of Deposit were determined by
the Trustee on the basis of an evaluation of such Bonds prepared by Kenny S&P
Evaluation Services, a firm regularly engaged in the business of evaluating,
quoting or appraising comparable bonds. With respect to Bonds in Insured Trusts
and insured Bonds in Traditional Trusts, Kenny S&P Evaluation Services evaluated
the Bonds as so insured. (See Section 5).
The amount by which the Trustee's determination of the OFFERING PRICES of
the Bonds deposited in the Trusts was greater or less than the cost of such
Bonds to the Sponsor was PROFIT OR LOSS to the Sponsor exclusive of any
underwriting profit. (See Section 3.) The Sponsor also may realize FURTHER
PROFIT OR SUSTAIN FURTHER LOSS as a result of fluctuations in the Public
Offering Price of the Units. Cash, if any, made available to the Sponsor prior
to the settlement date for a purchase of Units, or prior to the acquisition of
all Portfolio securities by a Trust, may be available for use in the Sponsor's
business, and may be of benefit to the Sponsor.
11. WHAT IS THE TAX STATUS OF UNITHOLDERS?
At the respective times of issuance of the Bonds opinions relating to the
validity thereof and to the exemption of interest thereon from Federal income
tax were rendered by bond counsel to the respective issuing authorities. In
addition, with respect to State Trusts, where applicable, bond counsel to the
issuing authorities rendered opinions as to the exemption of interest on such
Bonds, when held by residents of the state in which the issuers of such Bonds
are located, from state income taxes and certain state or local intangibles and
local income taxes. For a discussion of the tax status of State Trusts see
"Summary of Portfolios-- Tax Status" for the respective State Trust. (See
Sections 2 and 3.) Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have made any special
review for the Trusts of the proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds
or of the basis for the opinions rendered in connection therewith.
Taxpayers must disclose on their Federal tax returns the amount of
tax-exempt interest earned during the year. Federally tax-exempt income,
including income on Units of the Trusts, will be taken into consideration in
computing the portion, if any, of social security benefits received that will be
included in a taxpayer's gross income subject to the Federal income tax.
A-18
<PAGE>
Gain realized on the sale or redemption of the Bonds by the Trustee or of a
Unit by a Unitholder is includable in gross income for Federal income tax
purposes, and may be includable in gross income for state tax purposes. (Such
gain does not include any amounts received in respect of accrued interest or
accrued original issue discount, if any.) It should be noted that under
provisions of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 (the "Tax Act") described
below that subject accretion of market discount on tax-exempt bonds to taxation
as ordinary income, gain realized on the sale or redemption of Bonds by the
Trustee or of Units by a Unitholder that would have been treated as capital gain
under prior law is treated as ordinary income to the extent it is attributable
to accretion of market discount. Market discount can arise based on the price
the Trust pays for the Bonds or the price a Unitholder pays for his or her
Units.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, Counsel to the Sponsor, under existing
law:
(1) the Trusts are not associations taxable as corporations for Federal
income tax purposes. Tax-exempt interest received by each of the Trusts
on Bonds deposited therein will retain its status as tax-exempt
interest, for Federal income tax purposes, when received by the Trusts
and when distributed to the Unitholders, except that the alternative
minimum tax and environmental tax (the "Superfund Tax") applicable to
corporate Unitholders may, in certain circumstances, include in the
amount on which such taxes are calculated a portion of the interest
income received by the Trust. See "Certain Tax Matters Applicable to
Corporate Unitholders", below;
(2) each Unitholder of a Trust is considered to be the owner of a pro rata
portion of such Trust under Subpart E, subchapter J of Chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") and will have a taxable event
when the Trust disposes of a Bond or when the Unitholder redeems or
sells Units. Unitholders must reduce the tax basis of their Units for
their share of accrued interest received by the Trust, if any, on Bonds
delivered after the date the Unitholders pay for their Units and,
consequently, such Unitholders may have an increase in taxable gain or
reduction in capital loss upon the disposition of such Units. Gain or
loss upon the sale or redemption of Units is measured by comparing the
proceeds of such sale or redemption with the adjusted basis of the
Units. If the Trustee disposes of Bonds (whether by sale, payment at
maturity, redemption or otherwise), gain or loss is recognized to the
Unitholder. The amount of any such gain or loss is measured by comparing
the Unitholder's pro rata share of the total proceeds from such
disposition with the Unitholder's basis for his or her fractional
interest in the asset disposed of. In the case of a Unitholder who
purchases Units, such basis (before adjustment for earned original issue
discount and amortized bond premium, if any) is determined by
apportioning the cost of the Units among each of the Trust assets
ratably according to value as of the date of acquisition of the Units.
The tax cost reduction requirements of said Code relating to
amortization of bond premium may, under some circumstances, result in
the Unitholder realizing a taxable gain when his or her Units are sold
or redeemed for an amount equal to their original cost; and
(3) any amounts paid on defaulted Bonds held by the Trustee under policies
of insurance issued with respect to such Bonds will be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would
have been so excludable if paid by the respective issuer provided that,
at the time such policies are purchased, the amounts paid for such
policies are reasonable, customary and consistent with the reasonable
expectation that the issuer of the bonds, rather than the insurer, will
pay debt service on the bonds. Paragraph (2) of this opinion is
accordingly applicable to policy proceeds representing maturing
interest.
A-19
<PAGE>
In the opinion of Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, counsel to the Trustee, and, in the
absence of a New York Trust from the Series, special counsel for the Series for
New York tax matters, under existing law:
Under the income tax laws of the State and City of New York, each Trust
is not an association taxable as a corporation and the income of each Trust
will be treated as the income of the Unitholders.
For a summary of each opinion of special counsel to the respective State
Trusts for state tax matters, see Section 3.
ALL STATEMENTS IN THE PROSPECTUS CONCERNING EXEMPTION FROM FEDERAL, STATE OR
OTHER TAXES ARE THE OPINION OF COUNSEL AND ARE TO BE SO CONSTRUED.
The redemption of Units in a Trust by a Unitholder would result in each of
the remaining Unitholders of said Trust owning a greater proportionate interest
in the remaining assets of said Trust. Although present law does not directly
address this matter, it would appear reasonable that a remaining Unitholder's
tax basis in his Units would include his proportionate share of any proceeds
received by the Trust on the sale of bonds which were not distributed to him but
were instead used by the Trust to redeem Units and that his tax basis in the
remaining assets of the Trust would accordingly be increased by such share of
proceeds, based on the relative fair market value of the remaining assets of the
Trust as of the date of such redemption.
Sections 1288 and 1272 of the Code provide a complex set of rules governing
the accrual of original issue discount. These rules provide that original issue
discount accrues either on the basis of a constant compound interest rate or
ratably over the term of the Bond, depending on the date the Bond was issued. In
addition, special rules apply if the purchase price of a Bond exceeds the
original issue price plus the amount of original issue discount which would have
previously accrued based upon its issue price (its "adjusted issue price"). The
application of these rules will also vary depending on the value of the Bond on
the date a Unitholder acquires his Units, and the price the Unitholder pays for
his Units. The accrual of tax-exempt original issue discount on zero coupon
bonds and other original issue discount bonds will result in an increase in the
Unitholder's basis in such obligations and, accordingly, in his basis in his
Units.
The Tax Act subjects tax-exempt bonds to the market discount rules of the
Code effective for bonds purchased after April 30, 1993. In general, market
discount is the amount (if any) by which the stated redemption price at maturity
exceeds an investor's purchase price (except to the extent that such difference,
if any, is attributable to original issue discount not yet accrued). Under the
Tax Act, accretion of market discount is taxable as ORDINARY INCOME; under prior
law, the accretion had been treated as capital gain. Market discount that
accretes while the Trust holds a Bond would be recognized as ordinary income by
the Unitholders when principal payments are received on the Bond, upon sale or
at redemption (including early redemption), or upon the sale or redemption of
his or her Units, unless a Unitholder elects to include market discount in
taxable income as it accrues. The market discount rules are complex and
Unitholders should consult their tax advisors regarding these rules and their
application.
The Internal Revenue Code provides that interest on indebtedness incurred or
continued to purchase or carry obligations, the interest on which is wholly
exempt from Federal income taxes, is not deductible. Because each Unitholder is
treated for Federal income tax purposes as the owner of a pro rata share of the
Bonds owned by the applicable Trust, interest on borrowed funds used to purchase
or carry Units of such Trust will not be deductible for Federal income tax
purposes. Under rules used by the Internal Revenue Service for determining when
borrowed funds are considered used for the purpose of purchasing or carrying
particular assets, the purchase of Units may be considered to have
A-20
<PAGE>
been made with borrowed funds even though the borrowed funds are not directly
traceable to the purchase of Units (however, these rules generally do not apply
to interest paid on indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve a personal
residence). Similar rules are generally applicable for state tax purposes.
Special rules apply in the case of certain financial institutions that acquire
Units. Investors with questions regarding these issues should consult with their
tax advisers.
In general, each issue of bonds in the Trusts is subject to certain
post-issuance requirements which must be met in order for the interest on the
Bonds to be and remain exempt from Federal income taxation. Bond counsel to each
issuer generally has opined that, assuming continuing compliance by such issuers
with certain covenants, interest on such Bonds will continue to be exempt from
Federal income taxation (other than with respect to the application to corporate
Unitholders of the alternative minimum tax or the Superfund Tax, as discussed
below).
For purposes of computing the alternative minimum tax for individuals and
corporations, interest on certain specified tax-exempt private activity bonds is
included as a preference item. The Trusts do not include any such bonds.
For taxpayers other than corporations, net capital gains are presently
subject to a maximum tax rate of 28 percent. However, it should be noted that
legislative proposals are introduced from time to time that affect tax rates and
could affect relative differences at which ordinary income and capital gains are
taxed.
CERTAIN TAX MATTERS APPLICABLE TO CORPORATE UNITHOLDERS. In the case of
certain corporations, the alternative minimum tax and the Superfund Tax depend
upon the corporation's alternative minimum taxable income ("AMTI"), which is the
corporation's taxable income with certain adjustments. One of the adjustment
items used in computing AMTI and the Superfund Tax of a corporation (other than
an S corporation, Regulated Investment Company, Real Estate Investment Trust, or
REMIC) is an amount equal to 75% of the excess of such corporation's "adjusted
current earnings" over an amount equal to its AMTI (before such adjustment item
and the alternative tax net operation loss deduction). Although tax-exempt
interest received by each of the Trusts on Bonds deposited therein will not be
included in the gross income of corporations for Federal income tax purposes,
"adjusted current earnings" includes all tax-exempt interest, including interest
on all Bonds in the Trust and tax-exempt original issue discount.
Corporate Unitholders are urged to consult their own tax advisers with
respect to the particular tax consequences to them resulting under the Federal
tax law, including the corporate alternative minimum tax, the Superfund Tax and
the branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code.
EXCEPT AS NOTED ABOVE AND IN SECTION 3, THE EXEMPTION OF INTEREST ON STATE
AND LOCAL OBLIGATIONS FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES DOES NOT NECESSARILY
RESULT IN EXEMPTION UNDER THE INCOME OR OTHER TAX LAWS OF ANY STATE OR CITY. THE
LAWS OF THE SEVERAL STATES VARY WITH RESPECT TO THE TAXATION OF SUCH
OBLIGATIONS.
12. WHAT ARE NORMAL TRUST OPERATING EXPENSES?
No annual advisory fee is charged the Trusts by the Sponsor. The Sponsor does,
however, receive a fee of $0.17 per annum per $1,000 principal amount of the
underlying Bonds in each Trust for regularly evaluating the Bonds and for
maintaining surveillance over the portfolio. (See Section 16.)
The Trustee receives for ordinary recurring services an annual fee for each
plan of distribution for each Trust as set forth in "Essential Information
Regarding the Trusts." Each annual fee is per $1,000 principal amount of the
underlying Bonds in a Trust for that
A-21
<PAGE>
portion of the Trust that represents a particular plan of distribution. The
Trustee's fee may be periodically adjusted in response to fluctuations in
short-term interest rates (reflecting the cost to the Trustee of advancing funds
to a Trust to meet scheduled distributions) and may be further adjusted in
accordance with the cumulative percentage increase of the United States
Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index entitled "All Services Less Rent"
since the establishment of the Trusts. The Trustee has the use of funds, if any,
being held in the Interest and Principal Accounts of each Trust for future
distributions, payment of expenses and redemptions. These Accounts are
non-interest bearing to Unitholders. Pursuant to normal banking procedures, the
Trustee benefits from the use of funds held therein. Part of the Trustee's
compensation for its services to the Fund is expected to result from such use of
these funds.
Premiums for the policies of insurance obtained by the Sponsor or by the
Bond issuers with respect to the Bonds in the Insured Trusts and with respect to
insured Bonds in Traditional Trusts have been paid in full prior to the deposit
of the Bonds in the Trusts, and the value of such insurance has been included in
the evaluation of the Bonds in each Trust and accordingly in the Public Offering
Price of Units of each Trust. There are no annual continuing premiums for such
insurance.
The Sponsor has borne all costs of creating and establishing the Trusts. The
following are expenses of the Trusts and, when paid by or are owed to the
Trustee, are secured by a lien on the assets of the Trust or Trusts to which
such expenses are allocable: (1) the expenses and costs of any action undertaken
by the Trustee to protect the Trusts and the rights and interests of the
Unitholders; (2) all taxes and other governmental charges upon the Bonds or any
part of the Trusts (no such taxes or charges are being levied or made or, to the
knowledge of the Sponsor, contemplated); (3) amounts payable to the Trustee as
fees for ordinary recurring services and for extraordinary non-recurring
services rendered pursuant to the Indenture, all disbursements and expenses
including counsel fees (including fees of bond counsel which the Trustee may
retain) sustained or incurred by the Trustee in connection therewith; and (4)
any losses or liabilities accruing to the Trustee without negligence, bad faith
or willful misconduct on its part. The Trustee is empowered to sell Bonds in
order to pay these amounts if funds are not otherwise available in the
applicable Interest and Principal Accounts.
The Indenture requires each Trust to be audited on an annual basis at the
expense of the Trust by independent public accountants selected by the Sponsor.
The Trustee shall not be required, however, to cause such an audit to be
performed if its cost to a Trust shall exceed $.05 per Unit on an annual basis.
Unitholders of a Trust covered by an audit may obtain a copy of the audited
financial statements upon request.
13. WHEN ARE DISTRIBUTIONS MADE TO UNITHOLDERS?
Interest received by the Trustee on the Bonds in each Trust, including that part
of the proceeds of any disposition of Bonds which represents accrued interest
and including any insurance proceeds representing interest due on defaulted
Bonds, shall be credited to the "Interest Account" of such Trust and all other
moneys received by the Trustee shall be credited to the "Principal Account" of
such Trust.
The pro rata share of cash in the Principal Account in each Trust will be
computed as of each semi-annual Record Date and distributions to the Unitholders
as of such Record Date will be made on or shortly after the fifteenth day of the
month. Proceeds received from the disposition, including sale, call or maturity,
of any of the Bonds and all amounts paid with respect to zero coupon bonds and
Stripped Obligations will be held in the Principal Account and either used to
pay for Units redeemed or distributed on the Distribution Date following the
next semi-annual Record Date. The Trustee is not required to make a distribution
from
A-22
<PAGE>
the Principal Account of any Trust unless the amount available for distribution
in such account equals at least ten cents per Unit.
The pro rata share of the Interest Account in each Trust will be computed by
the Trustee each month as of each Record Date and distributions will be made on
or shortly after the fifteenth day of the month to Unitholders of such Trust as
of the Record Date who are entitled to distributions at that time under the plan
of distribution chosen. Persons who purchase Units between a Record Date and a
Distribution Date will receive their first distribution on the Distribution Date
following the next Record Date under the applicable plan of distribution.
Purchasers of Units who desire to receive interest distributions on a
monthly or quarterly basis may elect to do so at the time of purchase during the
initial public offering period. Those indicating no choice will be deemed to
have chosen the semi-annual distribution plan. All Unitholders, however, who
purchase Units during the initial public offering period and who hold them of
record on the first Record Date will receive the first distribution of interest.
Thereafter, Record Dates for monthly distributions will be the first day of each
month; Record Dates for quarterly distributions will be the first day of
February, May, August and November; and Record Dates for semi-annual
distributions will be the first day of May and November.
Details of distributions per Unit of each Trust under the various plans
based upon estimated Net Annual Interest Income at the Date of Deposit are shown
in the tables appearing in Section 3. The amount of the regular distributions
will remain the same so long as each Trust portfolio remains the same and fees
and expenses remain the same, and will generally change when Bonds are redeemed,
mature or are sold or when fees and expenses increase or decrease.
The plan of distribution selected by a Unitholder will remain in effect
until changed. Unitholders purchasing Units in the secondary market will
initially receive distributions in accordance with the election of the prior
owner. Unitholders desiring to change their plan of distribution may do so by
sending a written notice requesting the change, together with any
Certificate(s), to the Trustee. The notice and any Certificate(s) must be
received by the Trustee not later than the semi-annual Record Date to be
effective as of the semi-annual distribution following the subsequent
semi-annual Record Date. Unitholders are requested to make any such changes
within 45 days prior to the applicable Record Date. Certificates should only be
sent by registered or certified mail to minimize the possibility of their being
lost or stolen. (See Section 18.) If no notice is received in proper form by the
Trustee, the Unitholder will be deemed to have elected to continue the same
plan.
As of the first day of each month the Trustee will deduct from the Interest
Account of a Trust or, to the extent funds are not sufficient therein, from the
Principal Account of a Trust, amounts needed for payment of expenses of such
Trust. The Trustee also may withdraw from said accounts such amount, if any, as
it deems necessary to establish a reserve for any governmental charges payable
out of such Trust. Amounts so withdrawn shall not be considered a part of the
Trust's assets until such time as the Trustee shall return all or any part of
such amounts to the appropriate account.
For the purpose of minimizing fluctuations in the distributions from the
Interest Account of a Trust, the Trustee is authorized to advance such amounts
as may be necessary to provide for interest distributions of approximately equal
amounts. The Trustee shall be reimbursed, without interest, for any such
advances from funds in the Interest Account of such Trust. The Trustee's fee
takes into account the costs attributable to the outlay of capital needed to
make such advances.
A-23
<PAGE>
The Trustee shall withdraw from the Interest Account and the Principal
Account of a Trust such amounts as may be necessary to cover redemptions of
Units of such Trust by the Trustee. (See Section 19.)
Funds which are available for future distributions, redemptions and payment
of expenses are held in accounts which are non-interest bearing to Unitholders
and are available for use by the Trustee pursuant to normal banking procedures.
14. ACCUMULATION PLAN
The Sponsor, John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated, is also the principal underwriter
of the Nuveen Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. (the "Bond Fund"), Nuveen Tax-Free
Reserves, Inc. ("Tax-Free Reserves"), Nuveen California Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (the
"California Fund"), Nuveen Tax-Free Bond Fund, Inc. ("Tax-Free Bond Fund"),
Nuveen Insured Tax-Free Bond Fund, Inc. (the "Insured Bond Fund") and Nuveen
Tax-Free Money Market Fund, Inc. (the "Money Market Fund") and the Nuveen
Multistate Tax-Free Trust (the "Multistate Trust"). Each of these funds
(together, the "Accumulation Funds") is an open-end, diversified management
investment company into which Unitholders may choose to reinvest Trust
distributions automatically, without any sales charge. (Reinvestment in the
California Fund is available only to Unitholders who are California residents.
Reinvestment in the State Portfolios of the Tax-Free Bond Fund, the Insured Bond
Fund, the Money Market Fund and the Multistate Trust is available only to
Unitholders who are residents of the states for which such portfolios are
named.) Unitholders may reinvest both interest and principal distributions or
principal distributions only. Each Accumulation Fund has investment objectives
which differ in certain respects from those of the Trusts and may invest in
securities which would not be eligible for deposit in the Trusts. The investment
adviser to each Accumulation Fund is Nuveen Advisory Corp., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Sponsor. The following is a general description of the
investment objectives and policies of each Accumulation Fund. For a more
detailed description, Unitholders should read the prospectus of the Accumulation
Fund in which they are interested.
THE BOND FUND
The Bond Fund has the objective of providing, through investment in a
professionally managed portfolio of long-term municipal bonds, as high a level
of current interest income exempt from Federal income tax as is consistent with
preservation of capital. The Bond Fund may include in its portfolio tax-exempt
bonds rated Baa or BBB or better by Moody's or Standard & Poor's, unrated bonds
which, in the opinion of the investment adviser, have credit characteristics
equivalent to bonds rated Baa or BBB or better, and certain temporary
investments, including securities the interest income from which may be subject
to Federal income tax.
TAX-FREE RESERVES
Tax-Free Reserves is a "money market" fund that includes in its portfolio
only obligations maturing within one year from the date of acquisition,
maintains an average maturity of all investments of 120 days or less, values its
portfolio at amortized cost and seeks to maintain a net asset value of $1.00 per
share. It provides checkwriting and expedited wire redemption privileges for its
shareholders. Tax-Free Reserves has the objective of providing, through
investment in a professionally managed portfolio of high quality short-term
municipal obligations, as high a level of current interest income exempt from
Federal income tax as is consistent with preservation of capital and the
maintenance of liquidity. Tax-Free Reserves may include in its portfolio
municipal obligations rated Aaa, Aa, MIG-1, VMIG-1 or Prime-1 by Moody's or AAA,
AA, SP-1 or A-1 by Standard & Poor's, unrated municipal
A-24
<PAGE>
obligations that, in the opinion of the investment adviser, have credit
characteristics equivalent to obligations rated as above, tax-exempt obligations
backed by the U.S. Government, and temporary investments that may be subject to
Federal income tax.
THE CALIFORNIA FUND
The California Fund has the objective of providing, through investment in
professionally managed portfolios of California municipal obligations, as high a
level of current interest income exempt from both Federal and California income
taxes as is consistent with the investment policies of each of the portfolios of
the California Fund and with preservation of capital. Each portfolio of the
California Fund may include temporary investments that may be subject to tax.
California Unitholders may reinvest in one of three portfolios of the California
Fund: The Nuveen California Tax-Free Value Fund, the Nuveen California Insured
Tax-Free Value Fund and the Nuveen California Tax-Free Money Market Fund.
The Nuveen California Tax-Free Value Fund invests primarily in long-term
investment grade California tax-exempt bonds (I.E., bonds rated in the four
highest categories by Moody's or Standard & Poor's or, if unrated, that have
equivalent credit characteristics). The Nuveen California Insured Tax-Free Value
Fund invests primarily in the same type of investments as the Special Bond
Portfolio, each of which is covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment
of principal and interest or is backed by a deposit of U.S. Government
securities.
The Nuveen California Tax-Free Money Market Fund invests primarily in
high-quality short term California tax-exempt money market instruments (I.E.,
obligations rated in the two highest categories by Moody's or Standard & Poor's
or, if unrated, that have equivalent credit characteristics). This portfolio
will include only obligations maturing within one year from the date of
acquisition, will maintain an average maturity of all investments of 120 days or
less, will value its portfolio at amortized cost and will seek to maintain a net
asset value of $1.00 per share. The Nuveen California Tax-Free Money Market Fund
provides for an expedited wire redemption privilege.
THE TAX-FREE BOND FUND
The Tax-Free Bond Fund consists of the Nuveen Massachusetts Tax-Free Value
Fund, the Nuveen New York Tax-Free Value Fund, the Nuveen Ohio Tax-Free Value
Fund, and the Nuveen New Jersey Tax-Free Value Fund, which are each available
for reinvestment to Unitholders who are residents of the state for which such
portfolio is named. The Tax-Free Bond Fund has the objective of providing,
through investment in a professionally managed portfolio of municipal bonds, as
high a level of current interest income exempt both from Federal income tax and
from the income tax imposed by each portfolio's designated state as is
consistent with preservation of capital. The Tax-Free Bond Fund may include in
each of its portfolios tax-exempt bonds rated Baa or BBB or better; unrated
bonds which, in the opinion of the investment adviser, have credit
characteristics equivalent to bonds rated Baa or BBB or better; and certain
temporary investments, including securities the interest income from which may
be subject to Federal and state income tax.
THE INSURED BOND FUND
The Insured Bond Fund consists of the Nuveen Insured Municipal Bond Fund,
the Nuveen Massachusetts Insured Tax-Free Value Fund and the Nuveen New York
Insured Tax-Free Value Fund, which are each available for reinvestment to
Unitholders. (The Massachusetts and New York Portfolios are available only to
those Unitholders who are residents of the state for which the portfolio is
named.) The Insured Bond Fund has the objective of providing, through investment
in professionally managed portfolios of municipal bonds, as high a level of
current interest income exempt from both Federal income tax and, in the case of
A-25
<PAGE>
designated state portfolios, from the income tax imposed by each portfolio's
designated state, as is consistent with preservation of capital. The Insured
Bond Fund may include in each of its portfolios the same type of investments as
the Tax-Free Bond Fund, each of which is covered by insurance guaranteeing the
timely payment of principal and interest or is backed by a deposit of U.S.
Government securities.
THE MONEY MARKET FUND
The Money Market Fund consists of the Nuveen Massachusetts Tax-Free Money
Market Fund and the Nuveen New York Tax-Free Money Market Fund, which are each
available for reinvestment to Unitholders who are residents of the state for
which such portfolio is named. The Money Market Fund includes in its portfolios
only obligations maturing within one year from the date of acquisition,
maintains an average maturity of 120 days or less, values its portfolios at
amortized cost and seeks to maintain a net asset value of $1.00 per share. The
Money Market Fund has the objective of providing, through investment in
professionally managed portfolios of high quality short-term municipal
obligations, as high a level of current interest income exempt both from Federal
income tax and from the income tax imposed by each portfolio's designated state
as is consistent with stability of principal and the maintenance of liquidity.
The Money Market Fund may include in each of its portfolios municipal
obligations rated Aaa, Aa, MIG-1, MIG-2, VMIG-1, VMIG-2, Prime 1 or Prime 2 by
Moody's or AAA, AA, SP-1, SP-2, A-1 or A-2 by Standard & Poor's; unrated
municipal obligations that, in the opinion of the investment adviser, have
credit characteristics equivalent to obligations rated as above; and temporary
investments that may be subject to Federal and state income tax.
THE MULTISTATE TRUST
The Multistate Trust consists of the Nuveen Arizona Tax-Free Value Fund, the
Nuveen Florida Tax-Free Value Fund, the Nuveen Maryland Tax-Free Value Fund, the
Nuveen Michigan Tax-Free Value Fund, the Nuveen New Jersey Tax-Free Value Fund,
the Nuveen Pennsylvania Tax-Free Value Fund and the Nuveen Virginia Tax Free
Value Fund, which are each available for reinvestment to Unitholders who are
residents of the state for which such portfolio is named. The Multistate Trust
has the objective of providing, through investment in a professionally managed
portfolio of municipal bonds, as high a level of current interest income exempt
from both regular Federal income tax and the applicable state personal income
tax as is consistent with preservation of capital. The Multistate Trust may
include in each of its portfolios tax-exempt bonds rated "Baa" or "BBB" or
better, unrated bonds which, in the opinion of the investment advisor, have
credit characteristics equivalent to bonds rated "baa" or "BBB" or better,
limited to no more than 20% of the Multistate Trust's assets, and certain
temporary investments that may be subject to Federal and state income tax.
Each person who purchases Units of a Trust may become a participant in the
Accumulation Plan and elect to have his or her distributions on Units of the
Trust invested directly in shares of one of the Accumulation Funds. Reinvesting
Unitholders may select any interest distribution plan. Thereafter, each
distribution of interest income or principal on the participant's Units
(principal only in the case of a Unitholder who has chosen to reinvest only
principal distributions) will, on the applicable distribution date, or the next
day on which the New York Stock Exchange is normally open ("business day") if
the distribution date is not a business day, automatically be received by
Shareholder Services, Inc., transfer agent for each of the Accumulation Funds,
on behalf of such participant and applied on that date to purchase shares (or
fractions thereof) of the Accumulation Fund chosen at net asset value as
computed as of 4:00 p.m. eastern time on each such date. All distributions will
be
A-26
<PAGE>
reinvested in the Accumulation Fund chosen and no part thereof will be retained
in a separate account. These purchases will be made without a sales charge.
Shareholder Services, Inc. will mail to each participant in the Accumulation
Plan a quarterly statement containing a record of all transactions involving
purchases of Accumulation Fund shares (or fractions thereof) with Trust interest
distributions or as a result of reinvestment of Accumulation Fund dividends. Any
distribution of principal used to purchase shares of an Accumulation Fund will
be separately confirmed by Shareholder Services, Inc. Unitholders will also
receive distribution statements from the Trustee detailing the amounts
transferred to their Accumulation Fund accounts.
Participants may at any time, by so notifying the Trustee in writing, elect
to change the Accumulation Fund into which their distributions are being
reinvested, to change from principal only reinvestment to reinvestment of both
principal and interest or vice versa, or to terminate their participation in the
Accumulation Plan altogether and receive future distributions on their Units in
cash. There will be no charge or other penalty for such change of election or
termination.
The character of Trust distributions for income tax purposes will remain
unchanged even if they are reinvested in an Accumulation Fund.
15. HOW DETAILED ARE REPORTS TO UNITHOLDERS?
The Trustee shall furnish Unitholders of a Trust in connection with each
distribution, a statement of the amount of interest and, if any, the amount of
other receipts (received since the preceding distribution) being distributed,
expressed in each case as a dollar amount representing the pro rata share of
each Unit of a Trust outstanding and a year to date summary of all distributions
paid on said Units. Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each
calendar year, the Trustee shall furnish to each person who at any time during
the calendar year was a registered Unitholder of a Trust a statement with
respect to such Trust (i) as to the Interest Account: interest received
(including amounts representing interest received upon any disposition of
Bonds), and, except for any State Trust, the percentage of such interest by
states in which the issuers of the Bonds are located, deductions for fees and
expenses of such Trust, redemption of Units and the balance remaining after such
distributions and deductions, expressed in each case both as a total dollar
amount and as a dollar amount representing the pro rata share of each Unit
outstanding on the last business day of such calendar year; (ii) as to the
Principal Account: the dates of disposition of any Bonds and the net proceeds
received therefrom (excluding any portion representing accrued interest), the
amount paid for purchase of Replacement Bonds, the amount paid upon redemption
of Units, deductions for payment of applicable taxes and fees and expenses of
the Trustee, and the balance remaining after such distributions and deductions
expressed both as a total dollar amount and as a dollar amount representing the
pro rata share of each Unit outstanding on the last business day of such
calendar year; (iii) a list of the Bonds held and the number of Units
outstanding on the last business day of such calendar year; (iv) the Unit Value
based upon the last computation thereof made during such calendar year; and (v)
amounts actually distributed during such calendar year from the Interest Account
and from the Principal Account, separately stated, expressed both as total
dollar amounts and as dollar amounts representing the pro rata share of each
Unit outstanding.
Each annual statement will reflect pertinent information in respect of all
plans of distribution so that Unitholders may be informed regarding the results
of other plans of distribution.
A-27
<PAGE>
16. UNIT VALUE AND EVALUATION
The value of each Trust is determined by the Sponsor on the basis of (1) the
cash on hand in the Trust or moneys in the process of being collected, (2) the
value of the Bonds in the Trust based on the BID prices of the Bonds and (3)
interest accrued thereon not subject to collection, LESS (1) amounts
representing taxes or governmental charges payable out of the Trust and (2) the
accrued expenses of the Trust. The result of such computation is divided by the
number of Units of such Trust outstanding as of the date thereof to determine
the per Unit value ("Unit Value") of such Trust. The Sponsor may determine the
value of the Bonds in each Trust (1) on the basis of current BID prices of the
Bonds obtained from dealers or brokers who customarily deal in bonds comparable
to those held by the Trust, (2) if bid prices are not available for any of the
Bonds, on the basis of bid prices for comparable bonds, (3) by causing the value
of the Bonds to be determined by others engaged in the practice of evaluating,
quoting or appraising comparable bonds or (4) by any combination of the above.
Although the Unit Value of each Trust is based on the BID prices of the Bonds,
the Units are sold initially to the public at the Public Offering Price based on
the OFFERING prices of the Bonds.
Because the insurance obtained by the Sponsor or by the issuers of Bonds
with respect to the Bonds in the Insured Trusts and with respect to insured
Bonds in Traditional Trusts is effective so long as such Bonds are outstanding,
such insurance will be taken into account in determining the bid and offering
prices of such Bonds and therefore some value attributable to such insurance
will be included in the value of Units of Trusts that include such Bonds.
17. HOW UNITS OF THE TRUSTS ARE DISTRIBUTED TO THE PUBLIC
John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated is the Sponsor and sole Underwriter of the Units.
It is the intention of the Sponsor to qualify Units of National, Long
Intermediate, Intermediate, Short Intermediate and Short Term Trusts for sale
under the laws of substantially all of the states, and Units of State Trusts
only in the state for which the Trust is named and selected other states.
Promptly following the deposit of Bonds in exchange for Units of the Trusts,
it is the practice of the Sponsor to place all of the Units as collateral for a
letter or letters of credit from one or more commercial banks under an agreement
to release such Units from time to time as needed for distribution. Under such
an arrangement the Sponsor pays such banks compensation based on the then
current interest rate. This is a normal warehousing arrangement during the
period of distribution of the Units to public investors.
The Sponsor plans to allow a discount to brokers and dealers in connection
with the primary distribution of Units and also in secondary market
transactions. The primary market discounts are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Discount per Unit
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
National Long Inter- Short Inter-
and State mediate Intermediate mediate Short Term
Number of Units* Trusts Trusts Trusts Trusts Trusts
- ------------------------------ ---------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -----------
Less than 500................. $3.20 $2.90 $2.70 $2.00 $1.50
500 but less than 1,000....... 3.20 2.90 2.70 2.00 1.50
1,000 but less than 2,500..... 3.20 2.70 2.50 1.80 1.30
2,500 but less than 5,000..... 3.20 2.45 2.25 1.55 1.05
5,000 but less than 10,000.... 2.50 2.45 2.25 1.55 1.05
10,000 but less than 25,000... 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.30 .80
25,000 but less than 50,000... 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.30 .60
50,000 or more................ 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.00 .60
</TABLE>
*Breakpoint sales charges and related dealer concessions are computed both on a
dollar basis and on the basis of the number of Units purchased, using the
equivalent of 500 Units to $50,000, 2,500 Units to $250,000 etc. and will be
applied on that basis which is more favorable to the purchaser.
A-28
<PAGE>
The Sponsor currently intends to maintain a secondary market for Units of
each Trust. See Section 7. The amount of the dealer concession on secondary
market purchases of Trust Units through the Sponsor will be computed based upon
the value of the Bonds in the Trust portfolio, including the sales charge
computed as described in Section 6, and adjusted to reflect the cash position of
the Trust principal account, and will vary with the size of the purchase as
shown in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount of Purchase*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$50,000 $100,000 $250,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $2,500,000
Under to to to to to to $5,000,000
Years to Maturity $50,000 $99,999 $249,999 $499,999 $999,999 $2,499,999 $4,999,999 or more
- -------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Less than 1............... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 but less than 2......... 1.00% .90% .85% .80% .70% .55% .467% .389%
2 but less than 3......... 1.30% 1.20% 1.10% 1.00% .90% .73% .634% .538%
3 but less than 4......... 1.60% 1.45% 1.35% 1.25% 1.10% .90% .781% .662%
4 but less than 5......... 2.00% 1.85% 1.75% 1.55% 1.40% 1.25% 1.082% .914%
5 but less than 7......... 2.30% 2.15% 1.95% 1.80% 1.65% 1.50% 1.320% 1.140%
7 but less than 10........ 2.60% 2.45% 2.25% 2.10% 1.95% 1.70% 1.496% 1.292%
10 but less than 13....... 3.00% 2.80% 2.60% 2.45% 2.30% 2.00% 1.747% 1.494%
13 but less than 16....... 3.25% 3.15% 3.00% 2.75% 2.50% 2.15% 1.878% 1.606%
16 or more................ 3.50% 3.50% 3.40% 3.35% 3.00% 2.50% 2.185% 1.873%
</TABLE>
*Breakpoint sales charges and related dealer concessions are computed both on a
dollar basis and on the basis of the number of Units purchased, using the
equivalent of 500 Units to $50,000, 2,500 Units to $250,000, etc., and will be
applied on that basis which is more favorable to the purchaser.
The Sponsor reserves the right to change the foregoing dealer concessions
from time to time.
Certain commercial banks are making Units of the Trusts available to their
customers on an agency basis. A portion of the sales charge paid by these
customers is retained by or remitted to the banks in the amounts shown in the
above table. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibits banks from underwriting Trust
Units; the Act does, however, permit certain agency transactions and banking
regulators have not indicated that these particular agency transactions are not
permitted under the Act. In Texas and in certain other states, any bank making
Units available must be registered as a broker-dealer under state law.
To facilitate the handling of transactions, sales of Units shall be limited
to transactions involving a minimum of either $5,000 or 50 Units, whichever is
less. The Sponsor reserves the right to reject, in whole or in part, any order
for the purchase of Units.
18. OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER OF UNITS
The ownership of Units is evidenced by book entry positions recorded on the
books and records of the Trustee unless the Unitholder expressly requests that
the purchased Units be evidenced in Certificate form. The Trustee is authorized
to treat as the owner of Units that person who at the time is registered as such
on the books of the Trustee. Any Unitholder who holds a Certificate may change
to book entry ownership by submitting to the Trustee the Certificate along with
a written request that the Units represented by such Certificate be held in book
entry form. Likewise, a Unitholder who holds Units in book entry form may obtain
a Certificate for such Units by written request to the Trustee. Units may be
held in denominations of one Unit or any multiple or fraction thereof. Fractions
of Units are computed to three decimal places. Any Certificates issued will be
numbered serially for identification, and are issued in fully registered form,
transferable only on the books of the Trustee. Book entry Unitholders will
receive a Book Entry Position Confirmation reflecting their ownership.
Certificates for Units will bear an appropriate notation on their face
indicating which plan of distribution has been selected. When a change is made,
the existing Certificates must be surrendered to the Trustee and new
Certificates issued to reflect the currently effective
A-29
<PAGE>
plan of distribution. There will be no charge for this service. Holders of book
entry Units can change their plan of distribution by making a written request to
the Trustee, which will issue a new Book Entry Position Confirmation to reflect
such change.
Units are transferable by making a written request to the Trustee and, in
the case of Units evidenced by Certificate(s), by presenting and surrendering
such Certificate(s) to the Trustee, at its corporate trust office in New York
City, properly endorsed or accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of
transfer. The Certificate(s) should be sent registered or certified mail for the
protection of the Unitholder. Each Unitholder must sign such written request,
and such Certificate(s) or transfer instrument, exactly as his name appears on
(a) the face of the Certificate(s) representing the Units to be transferred, or
(b) the Book Entry Position Confirmation(s) relating to the Units to be
transferred. Such signature(s) must be guaranteed by a guarantor acceptable to
the Trustee. In certain instances the Trustee may require additional documents
such as, but not limited to, trust instruments, certificates of death,
appointments as executor or administrator or certificates of corporate
authority. Mutilated Certificates must be surrendered to the Trustee in order
for a replacement Certificate to be issued.
Although at the date hereof no charge is made and none is contemplated, a
Unitholder may be required to pay $2.00 to the Trustee for each Certificate
reissued or transfer of Units requested and to pay any governmental charge which
may be imposed in connection therewith.
REPLACEMENT OF LOST, STOLEN OR DESTROYED CERTIFICATES.
To obtain a new Certificate replacing one that has been lost, stolen, or
destroyed, the Unitholder must furnish the Trustee with sufficient
indemnification and pay such expenses as the Trustee may incur.
The indemnification protects the Trustee, Sponsor, and Trust from risk if
the original Certificate is presented for transfer or redemption by a person who
purchased it in good faith, for value and without notice of any fraud or
irregularity.
This indemnification must be in the form of an Open Penalty Bond of
Indemnification. The premium for such an indemnity bond may vary from time to
time, but currently amounts to 1% of the market value of the Units represented
by the Certificate. In the case however, of a Trust as to which notice of
termination has been given, the premium currently amounts to 0.5% of the market
value of the Units represented by such Certificate.
19. HOW UNITS MAY BE REDEEMED WITHOUT CHARGE
Unitholders may redeem all or a portion of their Units by (1) making a written
request for such redemption (book entry Unitholders may use the redemption form
on the reverse side of their Book Entry Position Confirmation) to the Trustee at
its corporate trust office in New York City (redemptions of 1,000 Units or more
will require a signature guarantee), (2) in the case of Units evidenced by a
Certificate, by also tendering such Certificate to the Trustee, duly endorsed or
accompanied by proper instruments of transfer with signatures guaranteed as
explained in Section 18 above, and (3) payment of applicable governmental
charges, if any. Certificates should be sent only by registered or certified
mail to minimize the possibility of their being lost or stolen. In order to
effect a redemption of Units evidenced by a Certificate, a Unitholder must
tender the Certificate to the Trustee or provide satisfactory indemnity required
in connection with lost, stolen or destroyed Certificates (See Section 18). No
redemption fee will be charged. A Unitholder may authorize the Trustee to honor
telephone instructions for the redemption of Units held in book entry form.
Units represented by Certificates may not be redeemed by telephone. The proceeds
of Units redeemed by telephone will be sent by check either to the Unitholder at
the address specified on his account or to a financial institution specified by
the Unitholder for credit to the account of the Unitholder. A Unitholder wishing
to use this method of redemption must complete a
A-30
<PAGE>
Telephone Redemption Authorization Form and furnish the Form to the Trustee.
Telephone Redemption Authorization Forms can be obtained from a Unitholder's
registered representative or by calling the Trustee. Once the completed Form is
on file, the Trustee will honor telephone redemption requests by any person. If
the telephone redemption request is received prior to 4:00 p.m. eastern time,
the Unitholder will be entitled to receive for each Unit tendered the Redemption
Price as determined above. A telephone redemption request received after 4:00
p.m. eastern time will be treated as having been received the following business
day. The redemption proceeds will be mailed within seven calendar days following
the telephone redemption request. Telephone redemptions are limited to 1,000
Units or less. Only Units held in the name of individuals may be redeemed by
telephone; accounts registered in broker name, or accounts of corporations or
fiduciaries (including among others, trustees, guardians, executors and
administrators) may not use the telephone redemption privilege.
On the seventh calendar day following the date of tender, or if the seventh
calendar day is not a business day, on the first business day prior thereto, the
Unitholder will be entitled to receive in cash for each Unit tendered an amount
equal to the Unit Value of such Trust determined by the Trustee, as of 4:00 p.m.
eastern time on the date of tender as defined hereafter, plus accrued interest
to, but not including, the fifth business day after the date of tender
("Redemption Price"). The price received upon redemption may be more or less
than the amount paid by the Unitholder depending on the value of the Bonds on
the date of tender. Such value will vary with market and credit conditions,
including changes in interest rate levels. Unitholders should check with the
Trustee or their broker to determine the Redemption Price before tendering
Units.
While the Trustee has the power to determine Redemption Price when Units are
tendered, the authority has by practice been delegated by the Trustee to John
Nuveen & Co. Incorporated, which determines the Redemption Price on a daily
basis.
The "date of tender" is deemed to be the date on which the request for
redemption of Units is received in proper form by the Trustee, except that as
regards a redemption request received after 4:00 p.m. eastern time or on any day
on which the New York Stock Exchange (the "Exchange") is normally closed, the
date of tender is the next day on which such Exchange is normally open for
trading and such request will be deemed to have been made on such day and the
redemption will be effected at the Redemption Price computed on that day.
Accrued interest paid on redemption shall be withdrawn from the Interest
Account of the appropriate Trust or, if the balance therein is insufficient,
from the Principal Account of such Trust. All other amounts paid on redemption
shall be withdrawn from the Principal Account. The Trustee is empowered to sell
underlying Bonds of a Trust in order to make funds available for redemption.
(See Section 21.) Units so redeemed shall be cancelled.
To the extent that Bonds are sold from a Trust, the size and diversity of
such Trust will be reduced. Such sales may be required at a time when Bonds
would not otherwise be sold and might result in lower prices than might
otherwise be realized.
The Redemption Price is determined on the basis of the BID prices of the
Bonds in each Trust, while the initial Public Offering Price of Units will be
determined on the basis of the OFFERING prices of the Bonds as of 4:00 p.m.
eastern time on any day on which the Exchange is normally open for trading and
such determination is made. As of any given time, the difference between the bid
and offering prices of such Bonds may be expected to average 1% to 2% of
principal amount in the case of Bonds in National, Long Intermediate and State
Trusts, 3/4% to 1 1/2% in the case of Bonds in Intermediate, and Short
Intermediate Trusts and 1/2% to 3/4% in the case of Bonds in Short Term Trusts.
In the case of actively traded Bonds, the difference may be as little as 1/4 to
1/2 of 1%, and in the case of inactively traded Bonds such difference usually
will not exceed 3%. The difference between the aggregate offering prices
A-31
<PAGE>
of the Bonds in each Trust and the aggregate bid prices thereof on the business
day prior to the Date of Deposit is shown in the discussion of specific trust
matters.
The right of redemption may be suspended and payment postponed for any
period during which the Securities and Exchange Commission determines that
trading in the municipal bond market is restricted or an emergency exists, as a
result of which disposal or evaluation of the Bonds is not reasonably
practicable, or for such other periods as the Securities and Exchange Commission
may by order permit.
Under regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service, the Trustee will
be required to withhold 31% of the principal amount of a Unit redemption if the
Trustee has not been furnished the redeeming Unitholder's tax identification
number in the manner required by such regulations. Any amount so withheld is
transmitted to the Internal Revenue Service and may be recovered by the
Unitholder only when filing his or her tax return. Under normal circumstances
the Trustee obtains the Unitholder's tax identification number from the selling
broker at the time the Certificate or Book Entry Return Confirmation is issued,
and this number is printed on the Certificate or Book Entry Return Confirmation
and on distribution statements. If a Unitholder's tax identification number does
not appear as described above, or if it is incorrect, the Unitholder should
contact the Trustee before redeeming Units to determine what action, if any, is
required to avoid this "back-up withholding."
20. HOW UNITS MAY BE PURCHASED BY THE SPONSOR
The Trustee will notify the Sponsor of any tender of Units for redemption. If
the Sponsor's bid in the secondary market at that time equals or exceeds the
Redemption Price it may purchase such Units by notifying the Trustee before the
close of business on the second succeeding business day and by making payment
therefor to the Unitholder not later than the day on which payment would
otherwise have been made by the Trustee. (See Section 19.) The Sponsor's current
practice is to bid at the Redemption Price in the secondary market. Units held
by the Sponsor may be tendered to the Trustee for redemption as any other Units.
The Public Offering Price upon resale of any Units thus acquired by the
Sponsor will be calculated in accordance with the procedure described in the
then currently effective prospectus relating to such Units. Any profit resulting
from the resale of such Units will belong to the Sponsor which likewise will
bear any loss resulting from a lower Public Offering Price or Redemption Price
subsequent to its acquisition of such Units.
21. HOW BONDS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE TRUSTS
Bonds will be removed from a Trust as they mature or are redeemed by the issuers
thereof. See the "Schedules of Investments" and "General Trust Information"
under Section 3 for a discussion of call provisions of portfolio Bonds.
The Indenture also empowers the Trustee to sell Bonds for the purpose of
redeeming Units tendered by any Unitholder, and for the payment of expenses for
which income may not be available. Under the Indenture the Sponsor is obligated
to provide the Trustee with a current list of Bonds in each Trust to be sold in
such circumstances. In deciding which Bonds should be sold the Sponsor intends
to consider, among other things, such factors as: (1) market conditions; (2)
market prices of the Bonds; (3) the effect on income distributions to
Unitholders of the sale of various Bonds; (4) the effect on principal amount of
underlying Bonds per Unit of the sale of various Bonds; (5) the financial
condition of the issuers; and (6) the effect of the sale of various Bonds on the
investment character of the Trust. Such sales, if required, could result in the
sale of Bonds by the Trustee at prices less than original cost to the Trust. To
the extent Bonds are sold, the size and diversity of such Trust will be reduced.
In addition, the Sponsor is empowered to direct the Trustee to liquidate
Bonds upon the happening of certain other events, such as default in the payment
of principal and/or
A-32
<PAGE>
interest, an action of the issuer that will adversely affect its ability to
continue payment of the principal of and interest on its Bonds, or an adverse
change in market, revenue or credit factors affecting the investment character
of the Bonds. If a default in the payment of the principal of and/or interest on
any of the Bonds occurs, and if the Sponsor fails to instruct the Trustee
whether to sell or continue to hold such Bonds within 30 days after notification
by the Trustee to the Sponsor of such default, the Indenture provides that the
Trustee shall liquidate said Bonds forthwith and shall not be liable for any
loss so incurred.
In connection with its determination as to the sale or liquidation of any
Bonds, the Sponsor will consider the Bond's then current rating, but because
such ratings are the opinions of the rating agencies as to the quality of Bonds
they undertake to rate and not absolute standards of quality, the Sponsor will
exercise its independent judgment as to Bond creditworthiness.
The Sponsor may also direct the Trustee to liquidate Bonds in a Trust if the
Bonds in the Trust are the subject of an advanced refunding, generally
considered to be when refunding bonds are issued and the proceeds thereof are
deposited in irrevocable trust to retire the refunded Bonds on their redemption
date.
Except as stated in Section 4 regarding the limited right of substitution of
Replacement Bonds for Failed Bonds, and except for refunding securities that may
be exchanged for Bonds under certain conditions specified in the Indenture, the
Indenture does not permit either the Sponsor or the Trustee to acquire or
deposit bonds either in addition to, or in substitution for, any of the Bonds
initially deposited in a Trust.
22. INFORMATION ABOUT THE TRUSTEE
The Trustee is United States Trust Company of New York, with its principal place
of business at 114 West 47th Street, New York, New York 10036 and its corporate
trust office at 770 Broadway, New York, New York 10003. United States Trust
Company of New York, established in 1853, has, since its organization, engaged
primarily in the management of trust and agency accounts for individuals and
corporations. The Trustee is a member of the New York Clearing House Association
and is subject to supervision and examination by the Superintendent of Banks of
the State of New York, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. In connection with the storage and
handling of certain Bonds deposited in the Trusts, the Trustee may use the
services of The Depository Trust Company. These services would include
safekeeping of the Bonds and coupon-clipping, computer book-entry transfer and
institutional delivery services. The Depository Trust Company is a limited
purpose trust company organized under the Banking Law of the State of New York,
a member of the Federal Reserve System and a clearing agency registered under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITIES OF SPONSOR AND TRUSTEE
The Sponsor and the Trustee shall be under no liability to Unitholders for
taking any action or for refraining from any action in good faith pursuant to
the Indenture, or for errors in judgment, but shall be liable only for their own
negligence, lack of good faith or willful misconduct. The Trustee shall not be
liable for depreciation or loss incurred by reason of the sale by the Trustee of
any of the Bonds. In the event of the failure of the Sponsor to act under the
Indenture, the Trustee may act thereunder and shall not be liable for any action
taken by it in good faith under the Indenture.
The Trustee shall not be liable for any taxes or other governmental charges
imposed upon or in respect of the Bonds or upon the interest thereon or upon it
as Trustee under the Indenture or upon or in respect of any Trust which the
Trustee may be required to pay under any present or future law of the United
States of America or of any other taxing authority having jurisdiction. In
addition, the Indenture contains other customary provisions limiting the
liability of the Trustee.
A-33
<PAGE>
SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES AND SPONSORS
The Trustee or any successor trustee may resign by executing an instrument
of resignation in writing and filing same with the Sponsor and mailing a copy of
a notice of resignation to all Unitholders then of record. Upon receiving such
notice, the Sponsor is required to promptly appoint a successor trustee. If the
Trustee becomes incapable of acting or is adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, or a
receiver or other public officer shall take charge of its property or affairs,
the Sponsor may remove the Trustee and appoint a successor by written
instrument. The resignation or removal of a trustee and the appointment of a
successor trustee shall become effective only when the successor trustee accepts
its appointment as such. Any successor trustee shall be a corporation authorized
to exercise corporate trust powers, having capital, surplus and undivided
profits of not less than $5,000,000. Any corporation into which a trustee may be
merged or with which it may be consolidated, or any corporation resulting from
any merger or consolidation to which a trustee shall be a party, shall be the
successor trustee.
If upon resignation of a trustee no successor has been appointed and has
accepted the appointment within 30 days after notification, the retiring trustee
may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a
successor.
If the Sponsor fails to undertake any of its duties under the Indenture, and
no express provision is made for action by the Trustee in such event, the
Trustee may, in addition to its other powers under the Indenture (1) appoint a
successor sponsor or (2) terminate the Indenture and liquidate the Trusts.
23. INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPONSOR
John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated, the Sponsor and Underwriter, was founded in 1898
and is the oldest and largest investment banking firm specializing in the
underwriting and distribution of tax-exempt securities and maintains the largest
research department in the investment banking community devoted exclusively to
the analysis of municipal securities. In 1961 the Sponsor began sponsoring the
Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust and, since this time, it has issued more than $30
billion in tax-exempt unit trusts, including over $8 billion in insured trusts.
The Sponsor is also principal underwriter of the Nuveen Municipal Bond Fund,
Inc., the Nuveen Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund, Inc., Nuveen Tax-Free Reserves,
Inc., Nuveen California Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Nuveen Tax-Free Bond Fund, Inc.,
Nuveen Insured Tax-Free Bond Fund, Inc. and Nuveen Tax-Free Money Market Fund,
Inc., all registered open-end management investment companies, and acted as
co-managing underwriter of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc., Nuveen California
Municipal Value Fund, Inc., Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund, Inc., Nuveen
Municipal Income Fund, Inc., Nuveen California Municipal Income Fund, Inc.,
Nuveen New York Municipal Income Fund, Inc., Nuveen Premium Income Municipal
Fund, Inc., Nuveen Performance Plus Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen California
Performance Plus Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen New York Performance Plus
Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Municipal Advantage Fund, Inc., Nuveen Municipal
Market Opportunity Fund, Inc., Nuveen California Municipal Market Opportunity
Fund, Inc., Nuveen New York Municipal Market Opportunity Fund, Inc., Nuveen
Investment Quality Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen California Investment Quality
Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen New York Investment Quality Municipal Fund, Inc.,
Nuveen Insured Quality Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Florida Investment Quality
Municipal Fund, Nuveen Pennsylvania Investment Quality Municipal Fund, Nuveen
New Jersey Investment Quality Municipal Fund, Inc., and the Nuveen Select
Quality Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen California Quality Municipal Fund, Inc.,
Nuveen New York Select Quality Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Quality Income
Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Insured Municipal Opportunity Fund, Inc., Nuveen
Florida Quality Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal
Fund, Inc., Nuveen New Jersey Quality Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Ohio
Quality Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Income
Municipal Fund, Nuveen Texas Quality Income
A-34
<PAGE>
Municipal Fund, Nuveen California Quality Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen
New York Quality Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Premier Insured Municipal
Income Fund, Inc., Nuveen Select Tax Free Income Portfolio, Nuveen Select Tax
Free Income Portfolio 2, Nuveen Insured California Select Tax-Free Income
Portfolio, Nuveen Insured New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio, Nuveen
Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc., Nuveen Select Tax Free Income Portfolio
3, Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund, Nuveen Select Tax Free Income
Portfolio 4, Nuveen Premium Income Municipal Fund 3, Inc., Nuveen Insured
California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Arizona Premium Income
Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Insured Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen
Insured Florida Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Michigan Premium Income
Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen New Jersey Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.,
Nuveen Insured New York Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Ohio Premium
Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Pennsylvania Premium Income Municipal Fund,
Nuveen Texas Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Premium Income Municipal Fund
4, Inc., Nuveen Pennsylvania Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen Insured
Florida Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen Maryland Premium Income
Municipal Fund, Nuveen Virginia Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen
Massachusetts Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Insured California Premium
Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc., Nuveen Insured New York Premium Income Municipal
Fund 2, Nuveen New Jersey Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen Washington
Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Michigan Premium Income Municipal Fund 2,
Nuveen Premium Income Municipal Fund 5, Nuveen Georgia Premium Income Municipal
Fund, Nuveen Missouri Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Connecticut Premium
Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen North Carolina Premium Income Municipal Fund,
Nuveen New Jersey Premium Income Municipal Fund 3, Nuveen Florida Premium Income
Municipal Fund, Nuveen New York Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen California
Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Pennsylvania Premium Income Municipal Fund
3, Nuveen Maryland Income Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen Virginia Premium Income
Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen Ohio Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen Insured
Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund
2, Nuveen Premium Income Municipal Fund 6, registered closed-end management
investment companies. These registered open-end and closed-end investment
companies currently have approximately $32.8 billion in tax-exempt securities
under management. Nationwide, more than 1,000,000 individual investors have
purchased Nuveen's tax exempt trusts and funds. The present corporation was
organized in 1967 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen Corporation, successor
to the original John Nuveen & Co. founded in 1898 as a sole proprietorship and
incorporated in 1953. In 1974, John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of The St. Paul Companies, Inc., a financial services
management company located in St. Paul, Minnesota. On May 19, 1992, common
shares comprising a minority interest in The John Nuveen Company ("JNC"), a
newly organized corporation which holds all of the shares of Nuveen, were sold
to the general public in an initial public offering. St. Paul retains a
controlling interest in JNC with over 70% of JNC's shares. The Sponsor is a
member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and the
Securities Industry Association and has its principal offices located in Chicago
(333 W. Wacker Drive) and New York (Swiss Bank Tower, 10 East 50th Street). It
maintains 14 regional offices.
24. OTHER INFORMATION
AMENDMENT OF INDENTURE
The Indenture may be amended by the Trustee and the Sponsor without the
consent of any of the Unitholders (1) to cure any ambiguity or to correct or
supplement any provision thereof which may be defective or inconsistent, or (2)
to make such other provisions as shall not adversely affect the Unitholders,
provided, however, that the Indenture may not be amended to increase the number
of Units in any Trust or to permit the deposit or acquisition
A-35
<PAGE>
of bonds either in addition to, or in substitution for any of the Bonds
initially deposited in any Trust except as stated in Section 4 regarding the
limited right of substitution of Replacement Bonds and except for the
substitution of refunding bonds under certain circumstances. The Trustee shall
advise the Unitholders of any amendment promptly after execution thereof.
TERMINATION OF INDENTURE
Each Trust may be liquidated at any time by written consent of 100% of the
Unitholders or by the Trustee when the value of such Trust, as shown by any
evaluation, is less than 20% of the original principal amount of such Trust and
will be liquidated by the Trustee in the event that Units not yet sold
aggregating more than 60% of the Units originally created are tendered for
redemption by the Sponsor thereby reducing the net worth of such Trust to less
than 40% of the principal amount of the Bonds originally deposited in the
portfolio. (See "Essential Information Regarding the Trusts.") The sale of Bonds
from the Trusts upon termination may result in realization of a lesser amount
than might otherwise be realized if such sale were not required at such time.
For this reason, among others, the amount realized by a Unitholder upon
termination may be less than the principal amount of Bonds originally
represented by the Units held by such Unitholder. The Indenture will terminate
upon the redemption, sale or other disposition of the last Bond held thereunder,
but in no event shall it continue beyond the end of the calendar year preceding
the fiftieth anniversary of its execution for National and State Trusts, beyond
the end of the calendar year preceding the twentieth anniversary of its
execution for Long Intermediate, and Intermediate Trusts or beyond the end of
the calendar year preceding the tenth anniversary of its execution for Short
Intermediate and Short Term Trusts.
Written notice of any termination specifying the time or times at which
Unitholders may surrender their Certificates, if any, for cancellation shall be
given by the Trustee to each Unitholder at the address appearing on the
registration books of the Trust maintained by the Trustee. Within a reasonable
time thereafter the Trustee shall liquidate any Bonds in the Trust then held and
shall deduct from the assets of the Trust any accrued costs, expenses or
indemnities provided by the Indenture which are allocable to such Trust,
including estimated compensation of the Trustee and costs of liquidation and any
amounts required as a reserve to provide for payment of any applicable taxes or
other governmental charges. The Trustee shall then distribute to Unitholders of
such Trust their pro rata share of the balance of the Interest and Principal
Accounts. With such distribution the Unitholders shall be furnished a final
distribution statement, in substantially the same form as the annual
distribution statement, of the amount distributable. At such time as the Trustee
in its sole discretion shall determine that any amounts held in reserve are no
longer necessary, it shall make distribution thereof to Unitholders in the same
manner.
LEGAL OPINION
The legality of the Units offered hereby has been passed upon by Chapman and
Cutler, 111 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603. Special counsel for the
Trusts for respective state tax matters are named in "Tax Status" for each Trust
under Section 3. Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, 2 Wall Street, New York, New York
10005, has acted as counsel for the Trustee with respect to the Series, and, in
the absence of a New York Trust from the Series, as special New York tax counsel
for the Series.
AUDITORS
The Statements of Condition and Schedules of Investments at Date of Deposit
included in this Prospectus have been audited by Arthur Andersen & Co.,
independent public accountants, as indicated in their report in this Prospectus,
and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts
in giving said report.
A-36
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF RATINGS*
STANDARD & POOR'S CORPORATION. A description of the applicable Standard &
Poor's Corporation rating symbols and their meanings follows:
A Standard & Poor's rating is a current assessment of the creditworthiness
of an obligor with respect to a specific debt obligation. This assessment may
take into consideration obligors such as guarantors, insurers or lessees.
The rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold a security,
inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price or suitability for a
particular investor.
The ratings are based on current information furnished by the issuer or
obtained by Standard & Poor's from other sources it considers reliable. Standard
& Poor's does not perform an audit in connection with any rating and may, on
occasion, rely on unaudited financial information. The ratings may be changed,
suspended or withdrawn as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, such
information, or for other circumstances.
The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations:
I. Likelihood of default--capacity and willingness of the obligor as to
the timely payment of interest and repayment of principal in accordance
with the terms of the obligation;
II. Nature of and provisions of the obligation;
III. Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in
the event of bankruptcy, reorganization or other arrangements under
the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights.
AAA--This is the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's to a debt
obligation. Capacity to pay interest and repay principal is extremely strong.
AA--Bonds rated AA have a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay
principal, and differ from the highest rated issues only in small degree.
A--Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal,
although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in
circumstances and economic conditions than bonds in higher rated categories.
BBB--Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection
parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more
likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal for
bonds in this category than for bonds in the higher rated categories.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): The ratings from "AA" to "BB" may be modified by the
addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major
rating categories.
Provisional Ratings: The letter "p" indicates that the rating is
provisional. A provisional rating assumes the successful completion of the
project being financed by the issuance of the bonds being rated and indicates
that payment of debt service requirements is largely or entirely dependent upon
the successful and timely completion of the project. This rating, however, while
addressing credit quality subsequent to completion of the project, makes no
comment on the likelihood of, or the risk of default upon failure of, such
completion. Accordingly, the investor should exercise his own judgment with
respect to such likelihood and risk.
- ----------
*As published by the rating companies.
A-37
<PAGE>
Note Ratings: A Standard & Poor's note rating reflects the liquidity
concerns and market access risks unique to notes. Notes due in 3 years or less
will likely receive a note rating. Notes maturing beyond 3 years will most
likely receive a long-term debt rating.
Note rating symbols are as follows:
SP-1 Very strong or strong capacity to pay principal and interest.
Those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety
characteristics will be given a plus (+) designation.
SP-2 Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest.
RATINGS OF INSURED TRUST UNITS.
A Standard & Poor's Corporation's rating on the units of an insured
investment trust (hereinafter referred to collectively as "units" and "trusts")
is a current assessment of creditworthiness with respect to the investment held
by such trust. This assessment takes into consideration the financial capacity
of the issuers and of any guarantors, insurers, lessees or mortgagors with
respect to such investments. The assessment, however, does not take into account
the extent to which trust expenses or portfolio asset sales for less than the
trust purchase price will reduce payment to the unitholder of the interest and
principal required to be paid on the portfolio assets. In addition, the rating
is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold units, inasmuch as the rating
does not comment as to market price of the units or suitability for a particular
investor.
Units rated "AAA" are composed exclusively of assets that are rated "AAA" by
Standard & Poor's and/or certain short-term investments. Standard & Poor's
defines its AAA rating for such assets as the highest rating assigned by
Standard & Poor's to a debt obligation. Capacity to pay interest and repay
principal is very strong. However, unit ratings may be subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by Standard & Poor's and each rating should be evaluated
independently of any other rating.
MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. A brief description of the applicable
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating symbols and their meanings follows:
Aaa--Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be the best quality. They carry
the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as "gilt
edge." Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable
margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely
to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the
fundamentally strong position of such issues. Their safety is so absolute that,
with the occasional exception of oversupply in a few specific instances,
characteristically, their market value is affected solely by money market
fluctuations.
Aa--Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all
standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known as
high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of
protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuations of
protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements
present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa
securities. Their market value is virtually immune to all but money market
influences, with the occasional exception of oversupply in a few specific
instances.
A--Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and
are to be considered as upper medium grade obligations. Factors giving security
to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may be present
which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future. The market
value of A-rated bonds may be influenced to some degree by economic performance
during a sustained period of depressed business conditions, but, during periods
of normalcy, A-rated bonds frequently move in
A-38
<PAGE>
parallel with Aaa and Aa obligations, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
Moody's bond rating symbols may contain numerical modifiers of a generic
rating classification. The modifier 1 indicates that the bond ranks at the high
end of its category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the
modifier 3 indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic rating
category.
Baa--Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade obligations,
i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments
and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective
elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great
length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in
fact have speculative characteristics as well. The market value of Baa-rated
bonds is more sensitive to changes in economic circumstances, and aside from
occasional speculative factors applying to some bonds of this class, Baa market
valuations move in parallel with Aaa, Aa and A obligations during periods of
economic normalcy, except in instances of oversupply.
Con. (--)--Bonds for which the security depends upon the completion of some
act or the fulfillment of some condition are rated conditionally. These are
bonds secured by (a) earnings of projects under construction, (b) earnings of
projects unseasoned in operation experience, (c) rentals which begin when
facilities are completed, or (d) payments to which some other limiting condition
attaches. Parenthetical rating denotes probable credit stature upon completion
of construction or elimination of basis of condition.
Note Ratings:
MIG 1--This designation denotes best quality. There is present strong
protection by established cash flows, superior liquidity support or
demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.
MIG 2--This designation denotes high quality. Margins of protection are
ample although not so large as in the preceding group.
A-39
<PAGE>
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-40
<PAGE>
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-41
<PAGE>
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-42
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<C> <S> <C>
NUVEEN Tax-Exempt Unit Trusts
PROSPECTUS
140,000 Units
California Insured Trust 228
Massachusetts Insured Trust
115
New Jersey Insured Trust 177
Pennsylvania Insured Trust
183
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<C> <S> <C>
NUVEEN Tax-Exempt Unit Trusts
Sponsor John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-1286
Telephone: 312.917.7700
Swiss Bank Tower
10 East 50th Street
New York, NY 10022
212.207.2000
Trustee United States Trust Company
of New York
770 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
800.257.8787
Legal Counsel Chapman and Cutler
to Sponsor 111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Independent Arthur Andersen & Co.
Public 33 West Monroe Street
Accountants Chicago, IL 60603
for the Trusts
</TABLE>
Except as to statements made herein furnished by the Trustee, the Trustee has
assumed no responsibility for the accuracy, adequacy and completeness of the
information contained in this Prospectus.
This Prospectus does not contain all of the information set
forth in the registration statement and exhibits relating thereto, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the
Securities Act of 1933, and to which reference is made.
No person is authorized to give any information or to make
representations not contained in this Prospectus or in supplementary sales
literature prepared by the Sponsor, and any information or representation not
contained therein must not be relied upon as having been authorized by either
the Trusts, the Trustee or the Sponsor. This Prospectus does not constitute
an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in any
State to any person to whom it is not lawful to make such offer in such
state. The Trusts are registered as a Unit Investment Trust under the
Investment Company Act of 1940. Such registration does not imply that the
Trusts or any of their Units has been guaranteed, sponsored, recommended or
approved by the United States or any State or agency or officer thereof.
739
<PAGE>
*********************************************
* PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED 7/14/94 *
*********************************************
NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100,000 UNITS SERIES 742
(A Unit Investment Trust)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The attached final Prospectus for a prior Series is hereby used as a
preliminary Prospectus for the above-stated Series. The narrative
information and structure of the attached final Prospectus will be
substantially the same as that of the final Prospectus for this Series.
Although the attached Prospectus includes trusts as indicated
therein, the specific trusts included in this Series when deposited may
differ from such trusts. Information with respect to the actual trusts to
be included, pricing, the number of Units, dates and summary information
regarding the characteristics of securities to be deposited in this Series
is not now available and will be different since each Series has a unique
Portfolio. Accordingly the information contained herein with regard to the
previous Series should be considered as being included for informational
purposes only. Ratings of the securities in this Series are expected to be
comparable to those of the securities deposited in the previous Series.
However, the Estimated Current Return for this Series will depend on the
interest rates and offering prices of the securities in this Series and may
vary materially from that of the previous Series.
**************************************************************************
* A registration statement relating to the units of this Series has been *
* filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission but has not yet *
* become effective. Information contained herein is subject to comple- *
* tion or amendment. Such Units may not be sold nor may offers to buy *
* be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes *
* effective. This Prospectus shall not constitute an offer to sell *
* or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale *
* of the Units in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale *
* would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the *
* securities laws of any such state. *
**************************************************************************
<PAGE>
Statement of differences between electronic filing and printed document.
Pursuant to Rule 499(c) (7) under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule
0-11 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, Registrant hereby identifies
those differences in the foregoing document between the electronic format in
which it is filed and the printed form in which it will be circulated:
(1) The printed and distributed prospectus may be paged differently
because the printed document may contain a different amount of information on
each page from that contained in the electronic transmission.
(2) On the cover page, in the index and on the last page of the printed
document, solid vertical bars will appear.
(3) In the printed document, footnote symbols may include a "dagger" or
multiple "dagger". The "dagger" symbol is represented as # in the electronic
document.
(4) The printed and distributed prospectus will not contain the
preliminary prospectus legend included at the beginning of the first
prospectus page.
<PAGE>
NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST, SERIES 742
Cross-Reference Sheet
Pursuant to Rule 404(c) of Regulation C
under the Securities Act of 1933
(Form N-8B-2 Items Required by Instruction 1 as
to Prospectus on Form S-6)
FORM N-8B-2 FORM S-6
ITEM NUMBER HEADING IN PROSPECTUS
I. ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION
1. (a) Name of trust ) Prospectus Cover Page
(b) Title of securities issued )
2. Name and address of Depositor )23 Information About the Sponsor
3. Name and address of Trustee )22 Information About the Trustee
4. Name and address of principal )23 Information About the Sponsor
Underwriter )
5. Organization of trust ) 1 What Is The Nuveen Tax-Exempt
) Unit Trust?
6. Execution and termination of ) 1 What Is The Nuveen Tax-Exempt
Trust Agreement ) Unit Trust?
)22 Information About the Trustee
)24 Other Information
7. Changes of Name *
8. Fiscal Year
9. Litigation
II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUST AND SECURITIES OF THE TRUST
10. General Information regarding ) 3 Summary of Portfolios
trust's securities ) 5 Why and How are the Bonds
Insured?
13 When Are Distributions
Made to Unitholders?
)18 Ownership and Transfer of Units
)19 How Units May Be Redeemed
Without Charge
)21 How Bonds May Be Removed From
) The Trusts
)22 Information About the Trustee
)23 Information About the Sponsor
)24 Other Information
)11 What Is The Tax Status of
) Unitholders?
11. Type of securities comprising ) 1 What Is The Nuveen Tax-Exempt
units ) Unit Trust?
) 3 Summary of Portfolios
) 4 Composition of Trusts
) 2 What Are The Objectives Of
) The Trusts?
5 Why and How are the Bonds
Insured?
12. Certain information regarding ) *
periodic payment certificates )
13. (a)Load, fees, expenses, etc. )ii Essential Information Regarding
) the Trusts on Date of Deposit of
Bonds
) 6 How Is The Public Offering Price
) Determined?
) 7 Market For Units
) 8 What Is Accrued Interest?
) 9 What Is The Estimated Current
) Return?
)10 How Was The Price Of The Bonds
) Determined At Date of Deposit?
)12 What Are Normal Trust Operating
) Expenses?
) 3 Summary of Portfolios
)13 When Are Distributions Made
) to Certificateholders?
)15 How Detailed Are Reports To
Certificateholders?
<PAGE>
(b)Certain information regarding ) *
periodic payment certificates )
(c)Certain percentages ) 6 How Is the Public Offering Price
) Determined?
) 7 Market For Units
) 9 What Is The Estimated Current
) Return?
)10 How Was The Price of the Bonds
) Determined At Date of Deposit?
) 8 What is Accrued Interest?
(d)Certain other fees, etc. )10 How Was The Price Of The Bonds
payable by holders ) Determined At Date of Deposit?
)12 What Are Normal Trust Operating
) Expenses?
)18 Ownership and Transfer of Units
(e)Certain profits receivable ) 4 Composition of Trusts
by depositor, principal under- )
writer, trustee or affiliated )20 How Units May Be Purchased By
persons ) The Sponsor
(f)Ratio of annual charges
to income *
14. Issuance of trust's securities ) 3 Summary of Portfolios
)13 When Are Distributions Made
) To Unitholders?
)18 Ownership and Transfer of Units
)19 How Units May Be Redeemed
) Without Charge
15. Receipt and handling of payments ) *
from purchasers )
16. Acquisition and Disposition of ) 1 What Is The Nuveen Tax-Exempt
Underlying Securities ) Unit Trust?
) 3 Summary of Portfolios
) 4 Composition of Trusts
) 5 Why and How are the Bonds
Insured?
)19 How Units May Be Redeemed
Without Charge
)21 How Bonds May Be Removed From
) The Trusts
)24 Other Information
17. Withdrawal or redemption ) 7 Market For Units
)19 How Units May Be Redeemed
) Without Charge
)20 How Units May Be Purchased By
) The Sponsor
18. (a)Receipt and disposition of income ) 3 Summary of Portfolios
)13 When Are Distributions
Made To Unitholders?
)15 How Detailed Are Reports To
) Unitholders?
(b)Reinvestment of distributions )14 Accumulation Plan
(c)Reserves or special funds ) 3 Summary of Portfolios
)13 When Are Distributions
) Made To Certificateholders?
(d)Schedule of distributions ) *
19. Records, accounts and reports )13 When Are Distributions Made
) To Certificateholders?
)15 How Detailed Are Reports To
) Certificateholders?
20. Certain miscellaneous provisions of )22 Information About the Trustee
Trust Agreement )23 Information About the Sponsor
)24 Other Information
<PAGE>
21. Loans to security holders ) *
22. Limitations on liability ) 3 Summary of Portfolios
) 4 Composition of Trusts
)22 Information About The Trustee
23. Bond arrangements ) *
24. Other material provisions of Trust ) *
Agreement. )
III. ORGANIZATION, PERSONNEL AND AFFILIATED PERSONS OF DEPOSITOR
25. Organization of Depositor )23 Information About the Sponsor
26. Fees received by Depositor ) *
27. Business of Depositor )23 Information About the Sponsor
28. Certain information as to officials ) *
and affiliated persons of Depositor )
29. Voting Securities of Depositor )23 Information About the Sponsor
30. Persons controlling Depositor )
)
31. Payments by Depositor for certain )
services rendered to trust )
) *
32. Payments by Depositor for certain )
other services rendered to trust )
)
33. Remuneration of employees of Depositor)
for certain services rendered to trust)
)
34. Remuneration of other persons for )
certain services rendered to trust )
<PAGE>
IV. DISTRIBUTION AND REDEMPTION OF SECURITIES
35. Distribution of trust's securities by )
states )
) *
36. Suspension of sales of trust's )
securities )
)
37. Revocation of authority to distribute )
38. (a)Method of distribution )
)
(b)Underwriting agreements )17 How Units of The Trusts Are
) Distributed To The Public
(c)Selling agreements )
39. (a)Organization of principal )
underwriter )
)23 Information About The Sponsor
(b)NASD membership of principal )
underwriter )
40. Certain fees received by principal ) *
underwriter
41. (a)Business of principal underwriter )
)
(b)Branch offices of principal under- ) *
writer )
)
(c)Salesmen of principal underwriter )
42. Ownership of trust's securities by ) *
certain persons )
)
43. Certain brokerage commissions received) *
by principal underwriter )
44. (a)Method of valuation )ii Essential Information Regarding
) The Trusts On Date Of Deposit Of
) Bonds
) 6 How Is The Public Offering Price
) Determined?
)10 How Was The Price Of The Bonds
) Determined At Date of Deposit?
)12 What Are Normal Trust Operating
) Expenses?
(b)Schedule as to offering price ) *
(c)Variation in offering price to ) 6 How Is the Public Offering Price
certain persons ) Determined?
) 8 What Is Accrued Interest?
)10 How Was The Price Of The Bonds
) Determined At Date of Deposit?
<PAGE>
45. Suspension of redemption rights ) *
46. (a)Redemption valuation )16 Unit Value and Evaluation
)19 How Units May Be Redeemed
) Without Charge
)20 How Units May Be Purchased By
) The Sponsor
(b)Schedule as to redemption price ) *
47. Maintenance of position in underlying ) 5 How Is the Public Offering Price
securities ) Determined?
)20 How Units May Be Purchased By
) The Sponsor
V. INFORMATION CONCERNING THE TRUSTEE OR CUSTODIAN
48. Organization and regulation of Trustee)21 Information About The Trustee
49. Fees and expenses of Trustee )ii Essential Information Regarding
) The Trusts On Date of Deposit Of
) Bonds
)12 What Are Normal Trust Operating
) Expenses?
50. Trustee's lien )12 What Are Normal Trust Operating
) Expenses?
)13 When Are Distributions Made
) To Unitholders?
VI. INFORMATION CONCERNING INSURANCE OF HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
51. Insurance of holders of trust's ) *
securities )
VII. POLICY OF REGISTRANT
52. (a)Provisions of trust agreement with )12 What Are Normal Trust Operating
respect to selection or elimination) Expenses?
of underlying securities )19 How Units May Be Redeemed With-
) out Charge
)21 How Bonds May Be Removed From
) The Trusts
(b)Transactions involving elimination ) *
of underlying securities )
(c)Policy regarding substitution or ) 3 Summary of Portfolio
elimination of underlying ) 4 Composition of Trusts
securities )21 How Bonds May Be Removed From
) The Trusts
(d)Fundamental policy not otherwise ) *
covered )
53. Tax status of trust )11 What Is The Tax Status Of
) Unitholders?
VIII. FINANCIAL AND STATISTICAL INFORMATION
54. Trust's securities during last ten years) *
55.) ) *
56.)Certain information regarding )
57.)periodic payment certificates )
58.) )
__________
*Inapplicable, omitted, answer negative or not required.
<PAGE>
CONTENTS OF REGISTRATION STATEMENT
A. BONDING ARRANGEMENTS OF DEPOSITOR:
The Depositor has obtained the following Stockbrokers Blanket Bonds for
its officers, directors and employees:
INSURER/POLICY NO. AMOUNT
United Pacific Insurance Co. $10,000,000
Reliance Insurance Company
B 74 92 20
Aetna Casualty and Surety $10,000,000
08 F10618BCA
St. Paul Insurance Co. $ 6,000,000
400 HC 1051
B. This Registration Statement comprises the following papers and documents:
The facing sheet
The Prospectus
The signatures
Consents of Counsel
Exhibits
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant, Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust, Series 742, has duly caused
this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized in the City of Chicago and State of Illinois on
7/14/94.
NUVEEN TAX-EXEMPT UNIT TRUST, SERIES 742
(Registrant)
By JOHN NUVEEN & CO. INCORPORATED
(Depositor)
By: James J. Wesolowski
_______________________
Vice President
Attest: Larry Woods Martin
___________________
Assistant Secretary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the
capacities and on the date indicated:
SIGNATURE *TITLE DATE
Richard J. Franke Chairman, Board of Directors, )
Chief Executive Officer and )
Director )
)
Donald E. Sveen President, Chief Operating )
Officer and Director )
)
Anthony T. Dean Executive Vice President and )James J. Wesolowski
Director )Attorney-in-Fact**
)
Timothy T. Schwertfeger Executive Vice President and )
Director )
)
O. Walter Renfftlen Vice President and Controller )
(Principal Accounting Officer))
)
)7/14/94
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*The titles of the persons named herein represent their capacity in and
relationship to John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated, the Depositor.
**The powers of attorney were filed on Form SE for Messrs. Franke, Sveen,
Renfftlen, Dean and Schwerfeger with the Amendment to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 of Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust, Series 671
(File No. 33-49175).
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF CHAPMAN AND CUTLER
The consent of Chapman and Cutler to the use of its name in the Prospectus
included in the Registration Statement will be filed by Amendment.
CONSENT OF STATE COUNSEL
The consents of special counsel to the Fund for state tax matters to the
use of their names in the Prospectus included in the Registration Statement
will be filed by Amendment.
CONSENT OF STANDARD + POOR'S CORPORATION
The consent of Standard + Poor's Corporation to the use of its name
in the Prospectus included in the Registration Statement will be filed by
Amendment.
CONSENT OF KENNY S+P EVALUATION SERVICES
The consent of Kenny S+P Evaluation Services to the use of its name in the
Prospectus included in the Registration Statement will be filed by Amendment.
CONSENT OF CARTER, LEDYARD & MILBURN
The consent of Carter, Ledyard & Milburn to the use of its name in the
Prospectus included in the Registration Statement will be filed by Amendment.
CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
The consent of Arthur Andersen & Co. to the use of its report and to the
reference to such firm in the Prospectus included in the Registration
Statement will be filed by Amendment.
<PAGE>
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
1.1(a) Copy of Trust Indenture and Agreement between John Nuveen & Co.
Incorporated, Depositor, and United States Trust Company of
New York, Trustee. Filed as Exhibit 1.1(A) to the Sponsor's
Registration Statement filed with respect to Series 723
(File No. 33-52527) and is incorporated herein by reference.
1.1(b) Schedules to Trust Indenture and Agreement (to be supplied by
amendment).
1.2* Copy of Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of John Nuveen
& Co. Incorporated, Depositor.
1.3** Copy of amendment of Certificate of Incorporation changing name
of Depositor to John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated.
2.1 Copy of Certificate of Ownership (included in Exhibit 1.1(A) and
Incorporated herein by reference).
3.1 Opinion of counsel as to legality of securities being registered
(to be supplied by amendment).
3.2 Opinion of counsel as to Federal income tax status of securities
being registered (to be supplied by amendment).
3.3 Consents of special state counsel to the Fund for state tax
matters to use of their names in the Prospectus (to be supplied
by amendment).
4.1 Consent of Standard + Poor's Corporation (to be supplied by
amendment).
4.2 Consent of Kenny S+P Evaluation Services (to be supplied by
amendment).
4.3 Consent of Carter, Ledyard & Milburn (to be supplied by
amendment).
6.1 List of Directors and Officers of Depositor and other related
information.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Incorporated by reference to Form N-8B-2 (File No. 811-1547) filed on behalf
of Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust, Series 16.
**Incorporated by reference to Form N-8B-2 (File No. 811-2198) filed on behalf
of Nuveen Tax-Exempt Unit Trust, Series 37.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 6.1
JOHN NUVEEN & CO. INCORPORATED
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
A.
OFFICERS
Richard J. Franke Chairman, Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Donald E. Sveen President, Chief Operating Officer
and Director
Anthony T. Dean Executive Vice President and Director
Timothy R. Schwertfeger Executive Vice President and Director
O. Walter Renfftlen Vice President and Controller
Paul E. Greenawalt Vice President
Anna R. Kucinskis Vice President
George P. Thermos Vice President
H. William Stabenow Vice President and Treasurer
Thomas C. Muntz Vice President
Robert B. Kuppenheimer Vice President
Paul C. Williams Vice President
Michael G. Gaffney Vice President
Robert D. Freeland Vice President
Bradford W. Shaw, Jr. Vice President
Stuart W. Rogers Vice President
James J. Wesolowski Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
Stephen D. Foy Vice President, Assistant
Controller and Assistant Secretary
Larry W. Martin Vice President, Assistant General
Counsel and Assistant Secretary
Gifford R. Zimmerman Vice President, Assistant General
Counsel and Assistant Secretary
Morrison C. Warren Assistant Secretary
Karen L. Healy Assistant Secretary
DIRECTORS
Richard J. Franke Chairman, Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Donald E. Sveen President, Chief Operating Officer
and Director
Anthony T. Dean Executive Vice President and Director
Timothy R. Schwertfeger Executive Vice President and Director
The principal business address of Messrs. Franke, Sveen, Dean and
Schwertfeger is 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois.
B.
Each officer and director of John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated has been an
officer, director or employee of the firm, or its corporate predecessor, for
more than five years, except as follows:
Mr. Morrison C. Warren became Associate Counsel in August, 1993 and
Assistant Secretary in March 1994. From September 1991 until August 1993
he was associated with the law firm of Chapman and Cutler, Chicago, Illinois.
From September 1988 until May 1991 he was a student at the University of
Notre Dame Law School.
Ms. Karen L. Healy joined the firm as a Legal Assistant in November, 1991
and became an Assistant Secretary in March 1994. From October 1989 until
November 1991 she was a Legal Assistant with the law firm of Schiff Hardin
& Waite, Chicago, Illinois. From August 1987 until October 1989 she was a
Legal Assistant with the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
7/14/94
Chicago, Illinois
