INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC, 10-K, 1999-02-22

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC
10-K, 1999-02-22
TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)

Previous: SYNAPTIC PHARMACEUTICAL CORP, SC 13G/A, 1999-02-22

Next: CAPPIELLO RUSHMORE TRUST, NSAR-A, 1999-02-22

<PAGE> 1

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

---------------------

FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:
0-20135

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DELAWARE 59-291-3586
<S> <C>
(State or other jurisdiction of (Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)
</TABLE>

3625 QUEEN PALM DRIVE
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33619
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (813) 829-0011

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NONE.
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE. RIGHTS TO PURCHASE UNITS
OF SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes [X] No [ ].

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment in this Form 10-K. [ ]

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates(1) of the
registrant on February 11, 1999: $465,084,252.

As of February 11, 1999, there were 49,457,139 shares of the Registrant's
Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DOCUMENT PART OF 10-K INTO WHICH INCORPORATED
- -------- ------------------------------------
PART III
<S> <C>
Proxy Statement relating to registrant's Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on May 20, 1999
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(1) As used herein, "voting stock held by non-affiliates" means shares of Common
Stock held by persons other than executive officers, directors and persons
holding in excess of 5% of the registrant's Common Stock. The determination
of market value of the Common Stock is based on the last reported sale price
as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market on the date indicated. The
determination of the "affiliate" status for purposes of this report on Form
10-K shall not be deemed a determination as to whether an individual is an
"affiliate" of the registrant for any other purposes.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC.

INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C> <C>
PART I
Item 1 Business.................................................... 1
Item 2 Properties.................................................. 26
Item 3 Legal Proceedings........................................... 26
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 26
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters....................................... 27
Item 6 Selected Financial and Other Operating Data................. 28
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................. 30
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure..................... 44
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 44
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.................................. 44
PART III
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 44
Item 11 Executive Compensation...................................... 45
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management................................................ 45
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 45
PART IV
Item 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form
8-K....................................................... 45
Signatures.................................................. 49
Glossary.................................................... 50
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3

PART I

References in this report to "the Company," or "Intermedia," "we," or "us"
mean Intermedia Communications Inc. together with its subsidiaries, except where
the context otherwise requires. Certain terms used herein are defined in the
Glossary which begins on page 51. This report contains certain "forward-looking
statements" concerning Intermedia's operations, economic performance and
financial condition, which are subject to inherent uncertainties and risks.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in this report.
When used in this report, the words "estimate," "project," "anticipate,"
"expect," "intend," "believe" and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

SUMMARY

Intermedia provides integrated communications services, including local,
long-distance, high-speed data and Internet services, to business and government
customers. Intermedia is the largest domestic independent company among those
companies generally referred to as competitive local exchange carriers ("CLECs")
(based upon fiscal 1998 telecommunications services revenues) and the largest
provider of shared tenant telecommunications services in the United States.
Intermedia is also a tier-one Internet service provider, the fourth largest
nationwide frame relay provider in the United States (based on frame relay
revenues of interexchange carriers), and a rapidly growing provider of Web
hosting services to Fortune 2000 companies. With over 950 sales and sales
support staff in 70 cities, Intermedia provides services to approximately 90,000
business customers nationwide and in selected international markets through a
combination of owned and leased network facilities. As an integrated
communications services provider with over ten years experience, Intermedia
believes it is well positioned to take advantage of technical, regulatory and
market dynamics that currently promote demand for a fully integrated set of
communications services.

Intermedia's reported revenues have grown from $14.3 million in 1994 to
$712.8 million in 1998, representing a compound annual growth rate of
approximately 166%.

Intermedia continues to increase its customer base and network density. As
of December 31, 1998, Intermedia's network infrastructure included over 347,000
local access line equivalents ("ALEs") in service, 23 voice switches, 177 data
switches, over 35,000 frame relay nodes and 680 network to network interfaces
("NNIs"), including NNIs with BellSouth Telecommunications Inc., US West,
Sprint, GTE, Bell Atlantic, and Southern New England Telecommunications Corp.
("SNET"). This infrastructure is capable of delivering local, long distance and
enhanced data services (including frame relay, asynchronous transfer mode
("ATM") and Internet related services) and enabled Intermedia to address $100
billion of a $237 billion national market opportunity by the end of 1998, as
compared to $34 billion at the end of 1997.

Intermedia expects to continue to realize economies of scale on its
intercity network: (i) through the continued deployment of local/long distance
voice switches to serve its rapidly growing customer base, and (ii) by combining
long distance voice traffic between switches with intercity enhanced data and
Internet traffic. During 1999, Intermedia plans to introduce a new class of
voice services which utilize data protocols ("Packet/Cell Switching") to deliver
voice traffic over Intermedia's network. However, the timing of such offering
will depend on a number of factors, including the maturation of industry
standards and the regulatory environment, and no assurance can be given that the
Company will not experience delays in launching this new product offering. These
services will provide a competitive service offering to customers seeking a more
cost-efficient and flexible alternative to voice services provided over
traditional circuit switched telecommunications networks. Intermedia believes
that Packet/Cell Switching networks, such as its own, will displace a
significant portion of the national telecommunications market that is currently
served over traditional circuit switched networks. Intermedia believes this new
service offering, when implemented, will accelerate its penetration of the
traditional voice services market and provide improved returns on its network
investment.

Intermedia's data services are provided over its interconnected frame
relay, ATM and Internet Protocol ("IP") based networks. Enhanced data services
include specialized communications services for customers needing to transport
various forms of digital data among multiple locations. An important category of

1
<PAGE> 4

Intermedia's enhanced data services is its Internet related services -- both
high-speed access to the Internet, as well as Web hosting and Web site
management services. According to industry sources, the market for Internet,
frame relay and ATM transport services will total nearly $15.5 billion by 2000,
of which Internet services will represent 50%, or $7.7 billion. Further, the Web
hosting market is predicted to increase to over $10.5 billion (of which $8
billion will be Web site management services) by 2002. There can be no assurance
that such market growth will be realized or that the assumptions underlying such
projections are reliable. To satisfy its customers' desire for end-to-end
enhanced data services (both networking and Internet services) from a single
provider, Intermedia has deployed its network and made interconnection
arrangements with other providers to offer national and international service.

Intermedia's mission is to become the premier provider of communications
solutions to businesses. Intermedia believes that its target customers have
sophisticated communications services requirements, including the need for
reliable network infrastructure, high quality, solutions-oriented and responsive
customer service and continuous focus on service enhancements and new service
development. Intermedia believes it has multiple advantages over its competitors
in serving its targeted customer base as a result of the Company's: (i)
specialized sales and service approach employing engineering and sales
professionals who design and implement integrated, cost-effective
telecommunications solutions; (ii) expertise in developing and operating a
highly reliable, advanced digital fiber optic network offering substantial
transmission capacity for the provision of a full suite of "all distance"
communications services; (iii) emphasis on providing solutions-oriented and
responsive customer service; (iv) network platform capable of servicing
customers throughout the United States and in selected international markets;
(v) network development plan designed to assure an efficient evolution from a
voice-oriented, circuit switched network to a Packet/Cell Switching network;
(vi) ongoing development and integration of new telecommunications technologies
into its services, especially those technologies that allow the increasing
integration of voice and data applications onto a single Packet/ Cell Switching
network; (vii) ability to deliver local, long-distance and enhanced data
services over a network controlled from end-to-end by Intermedia; (viii)
long-term contracts with building owners where the Company acts as a shared
tenant telecommunications services provider; and (ix) partnerships with other
telecommunications service providers, such as US West, Ameritech, Bell Atlantic,
and Williams, which expand Intermedia's channels of distribution (see
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Overview").

Over the past few years, a portion of Intermedia's growth has been
accomplished through acquisitions and other strategic ventures or selling
relationships. Intermedia often examines various acquisitions and other
strategic relationship proposals to accelerate its rate of growth. In addition
to financial considerations, Intermedia assesses each acquisition opportunity to
determine if it provides: (i) an established customer base to whom Intermedia
can cross-sell its other services, (ii) a greater network density in region or
needed network connectivity out of region, (iii) accelerated time to market in a
pre-defined target market, (iv) products and services that are complementary to
Intermedia's existing portfolio and (v) skilled staff, particularly in sales and
sales support. While management does not believe that acquisitions are necessary
to achieve Intermedia's strategic goals or to satisfy its business plan,
strategic alliances with or acquisitions of appropriate companies may accelerate
achievement of certain goals by creating financial and operating synergies, and
by providing for more rapid expansion of Intermedia's network and services.
Intermedia is currently evaluating and often engages in discussions regarding
various acquisition and strategic relationship opportunities. These acquisitions
could be funded by cash on hand and/or Intermedia's securities. Intermedia is
not a party to any agreement for any material acquisition or strategic
relationship nor can there be any assurance that any potential acquisition or
strategic relationship will be consummated.

Intermedia was incorporated in the State of Delaware on November 9, 1987,
as the successor to Florida corporation that was founded in 1986. Intermedia's
principal offices are located at 3625 Queen Palm Drive, Tampa, Florida 33619,
and its telephone number is (813) 829-0011.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

US West, Ameritech, Bell Atlantic and Williams. During 1998, Intermedia
entered into enhanced data services agreements with US West, Ameritech, Bell
Atlantic and Williams Telecommunications, Inc.
2
<PAGE> 5

(Williams). Pursuant to the agreements with US West and Ameritech, Intermedia
will provide frame relay networking and Internet services for interLATA
connections, both inside and outside US West's and Ameritech's Internet service
regions. Intermedia will begin to provide services under the agreement with Bell
Atlantic when and if Bell Atlantic obtains the approvals necessary under the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "Telecommunications Act") to offer long
distance services in its primary East Coast markets. Williams will use
Intermedia's enhanced data services in areas where it does not have switching
capability.

1998 Acquisitions. In March 1998, Intermedia consummated the acquisition
of Shared Technologies Fairchild, Inc. ("Shared"), the nation's largest provider
of shared tenant telecommunications services. The total purchase price for
Shared was approximately $782.2 million, including certain transaction expenses
and fees relating to certain agreements. Also in March 1998, Intermedia
consummated the acquisition of the affiliated entities known as Long Distance
Savers (collectively, "LDS"), an established regional interexchange carrier,
providing long distance services and Internet access in Louisiana, Texas,
Oklahoma, Mississippi and Florida. The total purchase price was approximately
$170.4 million including approximately $137.2 million in Intermedia's Common
Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock") and $33.2 million in cash,
of which $15.1 million was used to retire LDS's long-term debt. In April 1998,
Intermedia consummated the acquisition of the affiliated entities known as
National Tel (collectively, "National"), an emerging switch-based CLEC and an
established interexchange carrier providing local exchange and long distance
voice services in Florida's major metropolitan markets. The total purchase price
for National was approximately $153.2 million, consisting of approximately $88.7
million of Intermedia's Common Stock and $64.5 million in cash, including debt
repayment of $2.8 million. Intermedia believes that these acquisitions will
enable the Company to enhance Intermedia's national presence in the
telecommunications market, consolidate Intermedia's position in its southern
markets, particularly in Florida, one of the top five telecommunications usage
states in the country, and add experienced sales professionals to the Company's
marketing group.

Restructuring Program. On April 29, 1998, the Company announced that it
had committed resources to plan and implement the integration of acquired
businesses. During the second quarter of 1998, the Company developed and began
implementation of a restructuring program (the "Program"), which was designed to
streamline and refocus the Company's operations and transform Intermedia's five
separate operating companies into one integrated communications provider. The
significant activities in the Program include (i) consolidation, rationalization
and integration of network facilities, collocations, network management and
network facility procurement; (ii) consolidation and integration of the sales
forces of the Company and its recent acquisitions, including the integration of
the Company's products and services and the elimination of redundant headcount
and related costs; (iii) centralization of accounting and financial functions,
including the elimination of redundant headcount and related costs; (iv)
development and integration of information systems, including the integration of
multiple billing systems, and the introduction and deployment of automated sales
force and workflow management tools; (v) consolidation of office space and the
elimination of unnecessary legal entities; and (vi) exiting non-strategic
businesses including the elimination of redundant headcount and related costs.
The Company expensed a total of $53.5 million of business restructuring,
integration and other charges associated with the Program during 1998. These
charges were excluded from the calculation of EBITDA before certain charges (as
defined herein). Management anticipates that all activities included in the
Program will be completed by the end of 1999 and the Company anticipates
incurring additional related business integration and restructuring costs
through the end of that period. These costs will also be excluded from the
calculation of EBITDA before certain charges.

Williams Agreement. In March 1998, Intermedia signed a definitive
agreement with Williams to purchase nationwide transmission capacity on
Williams' fiber optic network. The 20 year indefeasible right of use ("IRU")
provides Intermedia with high capacity transport for its integrated voice and
data services, connecting major markets throughout the continental United
States. The agreement had the immediate effect of reducing Intermedia's unit
cost for digital, intercity transmission capacity. Initial implementation of the
agreement provides for the connection of approximately 50 cities over the next
12 months, with additional cities to follow. The capacity provided by Williams
will become part of Intermedia's nationwide network of self-healing rings, over
which the Company will deliver its integrated voice and data services.

3
<PAGE> 6

1998 Financing Transactions. During 1998, Intermedia consummated two
offerings (and the sale of senior notes pursuant to an over-allotment option
related to a December 1997 offering) pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), one of preferred
stock and one of senior notes. These offerings, in aggregate, raised proceeds to
Intermedia of approximately $730.8 million. The proceeds from these offerings
have been used, and are reserved for use, for the expansion of Intermedia's
network and for other corporate purposes. On June 15, 1998, the Company effected
a 2 for 1 split of its Common Stock through a stock dividend paid to
stockholders of record on June 1, 1998. During July and August 1998, the Company
issued approximately 3.5 million shares of Common Stock in exchange for
approximately $75 million liquidation preference of outstanding preferred stock
pursuant to exchange agreements.

Rule 144A Offerings. On February 9, 1999, the Company announced the
commencement of concurrent private offerings of $300 million principal amount of
Senior Notes due 2009 (the "Senior Notes") and $200 million gross proceeds of
Senior Subordinated Discount Notes due 2009 (the "Senior Subordinated Notes")
pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. The offering of the
Senior Notes and the offering of the Senior Subordinated Notes are not
conditioned on one another. The net proceeds from the offering of the Senior
Notes will be used to fund up to 80% of the cost of acquisition or construction
by the Company of telecommunications related assets. The net proceeds from the
offering of the Senior Subordinated Notes will be used for general corporate
purposes, including to fund working capital and operating losses, and to fund a
portion of the cost of acquisition or construction by the Company of
telecommunications-related assets.

The Senior Notes and the Senior Subordinated Notes to be sold in the
offerings have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or
any state securities or blue sky laws, and may not be offered or sold in the
United States or in any state thereof absent registration or an applicable
exemption from the registration requirements of such laws.

Anticipated Public Offering of DIGEX. During 1999, Intermedia expects its
wholly-owned, Web hosting subsidiary, DIGEX, Incorporated ("DIGEX"), to offer to
sell a portion of its capital stock to the public. While Intermedia expects to
own at least 51% of the capital stock of DIGEX after the public offering,
Intermedia may take other actions in the future which would further decrease its
ownership interest. DIGEX anticipates using the proceeds of the public offering
to finance a portion of the expenses and capital requirements associated with
the continued expansion of its Web hosting business, including the construction
of additional data centers. Intermedia anticipates funding DIGEX's future
capital requirements independently of Intermedia. The Company may elect not to
proceed with a DIGEX offering based on valuation issues or marketing
considerations. There can be no assurance that DIGEX will successfully complete
the planned public offering or, if completed, the timing of the offering or the
proceeds DIGEX will receive.

SERVICES PROVIDED AND MARKETS SERVED

Intermedia's integrated portfolio of services fall into four major
categories: (i) local network services, which include local exchange services,
special and switched access services and local private line services; (ii)
enhanced data services, which include frame relay, ATM, high speed Internet
services and Web hosting services; (iii) interexchange (long-distance) services;
and (iv) integration services, which include the design, installation, sale and
on-going maintenance of customer premise equipment such as private branch
exchanges ("PBXs") and key systems.

The Company offers a broad portfolio of services in response to market
demands and to maximize its selling potential. Intermedia's current and
prospective customers demand quality telecommunications services with simplified
vendor interfaces and highly cost-effective solutions. The Company understands
that customers expect Intermedia to solve their communications challenges. By
offering an integrated package, Intermedia believes it can access a larger
market, improve customer retention, achieve higher total margin, leverage its
sales force and deployed capital, and reduce the cost of acquiring new
customers.

Local Network Services. Intermedia's local network services consist of
private line services, which the Company has been offering since 1987, and local
exchange services, which the Company began offering in
4
<PAGE> 7

1996. Intermedia provides customers private line services either by building
network facilities or by leasing extended network facilities to the customer's
premises. Intermedia's local exchange services are typically provided in a
bundled package, in combination with long distance and often with one or more
additional service offerings. This enables Intermedia to increase its revenue
generating product mix without having to acquire additional transport
facilities.

The Company has built its base of local network service customers by
offering reliable, quality services to business customers in major metropolitan
markets. In 1998, local network services accounted for approximately 23% (or
approximately $163.4 million) of the Company's total revenue. Intermedia
believes the revenue from local services will continue to grow through the
introduction of local exchange services in additional markets, expansion of its
network within existing markets and increased penetration of existing customers
through provision of new incremental services.

Enhanced Data Services. Intermedia's enhanced data services are provided
over its interconnected frame relay, ATM and IP based networks. These services,
which represent one of the Company's fastest growing segments, enable customers
with multiple business locations to economically and securely transmit large
volumes of data from one site to another. All of the customer's locations,
whether domestic or international, are monitored by the Company and can be
serviced through Intermedia's own facilities or through use of interconnected
networks. As a consequence of a significantly increased volume of traffic and
number of Internet customers connected to Intermedia's network, many of these
customers connect to other users or Internet hosts without ever leaving
Intermedia's network. Over 300 Internet service providers utilize Intermedia's
network for access to their customers and other Internet sites.

Frame Relay and ATM. As the fourth largest frame relay provider in the
United States, Intermedia provides end-to-end guaranteed performance of a
customer's entire network, including the local loop. Intermedia is able to
extend this level of guaranteed performance since it has one of the most highly
distributed frame relay networks in the United States, extending the
self-healing benefits of frame relay to most first, second, and third tier
cities throughout the nation. At December 31, 1998, Intermedia served over
35,000 frame relay nodes across a nationwide network utilizing 177 data switches
and 680 NNIs. Intermedia's ATM services are designed for high capacity customers
requiring the flexibility of serving single or multiple locations from one
originating location. These services can be used to facilitate multi-media
networking between high-speed devices such as work stations, super computers,
routers, and bridges.

Internet. Intermedia is well positioned to capitalize on the rapidly
growing Internet services segment of the communications market. Intermedia is a
nationally recognized tier-one service provider of IP/Internet connectivity and
applications services. (Tier-one providers are those companies that own/operate
their own coast-to-coast IP networks with recognized private peering
arrangements to connect their customers to other tier-one Internet providers.)
In the past year, Intermedia has expanded its service offerings beyond purely
traditional connectivity offerings to value-added applications such as on-site
firewall installation and integration, IP enabled faxing capabilities, and other
Web-enabled administrative support tools.

Web Hosting. As a leading provider of Web hosting services, Intermedia
also manages secure, scalable, high performance Web sites and Web-based
enterprise solutions (including the server, software, operating system,
connectivity, and applications). With state-of-the-art data centers in Maryland
and California, the Company provides hands-on technical expertise, proactive
customer service/support and value-added solutions to Fortune 2000 companies
with specialty Web-intensive needs.

In 1998, the Company's enhanced data services accounted for 26% (or
approximately $181.6 million) of Intermedia's total revenue. According to
industry sources, the market for Internet, frame relay and ATM transport
services will total nearly $15.5 billion by 2000, of which Internet services
will represent 50%, or $7.7 billion. Further, the Web hosting market is
predicted to increase to over $10.5 billion (of which $8 billion will be Web
site management services) by 2002. There can be no assurance, however, that such
market growth will be realized or that the assumptions underlying such
projections are reliable.

Long Distance Services. Intermedia has offered long distance services
since December 1994. Long distance services include inbound (800 or 888)
service, outbound service, calling card telephone service and

5
<PAGE> 8

interLATA private line service, and are referred to as interexchange services in
the Company's financial statements. The Company currently provides interLATA
long distance services in all 50 states, interstate long distance services
nationwide and international termination worldwide. In 1998, Intermedia's
interexchange services accounted for approximately 37% ($266.4 million) of the
Company's total revenue.

Integration Services. As part of its integration services, the Company
engineers, installs, operates and maintains PBXs, key systems and other customer
premise communications equipment for thousands of customers nationwide,
developing specialized solutions for customers' specific telecommunications
needs. Intermedia believes such services increase the level of linkage with the
customer, thereby increasing the customer's reliance on Intermedia. Target
customers for integration services include medium to large commercial
businesses, hotels, government agencies and hospitals. The Company believes the
demand for integration services will continue to grow as businesses seek support
in their efforts to address Year 2000 compliance issues, as well as take
advantage of emerging technologies. In 1998, integration services accounted for
approximately 14% (or approximately $101.4 million) of the Company's total
revenue.

Intermedia believes that the introduction of its services at competitive
market rates has stimulated demand from small and medium-sized customers,
thereby broadening the market for Intermedia's services. Each of Intermedia's
individually packaged services is competitively priced, and when integrated into
a comprehensive telecommunications package, typically provides significant value
and savings to such customers over a combination of incumbent local exchange
carrier ("ILEC") and interexchange carrier service offerings.

The Company has responded to the increase globalization of business and
established its ability to serve the international connectivity needs of its
customers through key vendors and strategic alliances. As of December 31, 1998,
Intermedia was able to provide frame relay and private line connectivity to 56
countries (in addition to the United States) and voice and fax connectivity to
over 250 countries worldwide. The Company offers a robust frame relay solution
in Canada and Mexico and has competitive frame relay offerings in Europe,
Asia/Pacific and Latin America. Planned future offerings include enhanced voice
solutions such as international calling cards and international toll free
service.

The following table sets forth the Company's estimates, based upon an
analysis of industry sources, including industry projections and Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") data, of the market size nationally of certain
of the services described above. Only a limited amount of direct information is
currently available and therefore a significant portion of the information set
forth below is based upon estimates and assumptions made by the Company.
Intermedia believes that its estimates are based upon reliable information and
that its assumptions are reasonable. There can be no assurance, however, that
the estimates will not vary from the actual market data and that these variances
will not be substantial.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNITED STATES
COMPETITIVE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MARKET OPPORTUNITY
1998 COMPANY ESTIMATES
----------------------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
Local Exchange Services(1).................................. $ 94,000
Access Services............................................. 38,500
Enhanced Data Services(2)................................... 3,000
Interexchange Services...................................... 101,500
--------
Total Market Size................................. $237,000
========
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(1) The Company is currently permitted to offer these services in 37 states and
the District of Columbia.

(2) Enhanced Data Services do not include Internet and Web site services market
size data. This estimate represents frame relay and ATM services.

The market sizes set forth in the above table are not intended to provide
an indication of the Company's total addressable market or the revenue potential
for the Company's services. Intermedia has obtained all

6
<PAGE> 9

certifications necessary to permit the Company to provide local exchange service
in 37 states and the District of Columbia. In addition, the Company's ability to
offer services in its territory is limited by the size and coverage of its
network. The Company derives its addressable market estimates by multiplying the
total national market size estimated above by the percentage of the population
(as derived from U.S. Census Bureau information) residing in the Company's
market areas. This estimate assumes that per capita telecommunications services
usage is the same in various regions of the United States. The Company estimates
that its 1998 addressable market, computed under this methodology, was
approximately $100 billion.

SALES, MARKETING AND SERVICE DELIVERY

The Company builds long-term relationships with its customers by providing
a broad portfolio of integrated services, and by leveraging one or more of its
services into a partnership with the customer in which Intermedia becomes the
single source provider of all of the customer's telecommunications needs.

Intermedia approaches the market through segmentation of its addressable
markets -- defining clusters of potential customers with similar needs that can
be addressed profitability by the Company. By tailoring solutions to select
market segments, rather than selling services at large, Intermedia endeavors to
create value for its customers and a distinct advantage for itself.

Intermedia focuses on five major market categories:

Tenants of Large Commercial Office Buildings. Intermedia targets high
concentrations of business customers in locations where network, labor, and
selling efficiencies can make Intermedia the low cost provider of
telecommunications services. These high concentrations are found in multi-tenant
commercial office buildings (200,000 square feet and larger) in major
metropolitan areas. Customers benefit from the breadth of voice and data
services offered through Intermedia's on-site facilities and technical
staff -- without the expense, risks and responsibilities of direct ownership of
high technology equipment.

Small Multi-Application Businesses. Intermedia targets companies with less
than 100 employees in information intensive industries (e.g., professional
services, light manufacturing, etc.) that have high telecommunications usage
(long distance spending in excess of $500 per month). Management believes these
customers are easy to identify, typically make purchasing decisions locally, and
recognize the value of quality integrated communications technology in their
businesses. These customers have also shown a preference for a single bill and
single point of contact for their communications needs.

ILECs/RBOCs. This category is represented by the partnering arrangements
Intermedia has with US West, Ameritech and Bell Atlantic, as well as the
informal alliances it has with BellSouth and SBC to provide enhanced data
service to the ILECs' and regional Bell operating companies' ("RBOCs")
customers. The result is an integrated extension of Intermedia's and the ILEC's
operational and service delivery functions, all transparent to the end user
customer. Intermedia benefits from a reduced cost of acquiring customers through
an indirect, extended sales force, while the ILECs benefit from expanding their
product portfolios.

High Transaction-Oriented Businesses. These businesses generate
significant amounts of data and voice communications traffic, and include
financial service firms (e.g., banks, securities/brokerage firms, insurance
companies, real estate companies, etc.), retail stores and call center
operations.

Internet Service Providers. Intermedia's goal is to target Internet
service providers and other aggregators of Internet services, focusing on the
top 3,000 Internet service providers that connect into Intermedia's switch
locations.

As the Company enters a market, the sales force has clearly defined
geographic boundaries based on the margins attainable from delivering the
Company's integrated services package. Intermedia's sales force is compensated
with higher incentives when they sell higher margin services and when they sell
a bundled package offering. Sales agents are also compensated for referrals to
other Intermedia marketing specialists which result in sales of additional
services. All of Intermedia's sales force is backed by highly experienced
technical personnel, including sales engineers and project managers, who are
deployed throughout In-

7
<PAGE> 10

termedia's service territory. Intermedia's service delivery staff is organized
around the delivery of total solutions to each customer. This includes the
proper coordination of service components provided by supporting vendors, the
preparation of the customer's site, if needed, and the installation, testing and
delivery to the customer of the service solution. Thereafter, Intermedia
monitors and maintains the quality and integrity of the service through its
customer service and technical support staff, available 24 hours per day, 365
days per year. Services are monitored at locations in Tampa, Florida; Albany,
New York; and suburban Washington, D.C.

The Company is creating a culture of cross-selling because it recognizes
the need to retain the current customer base and aggressively cross-sell other
products to these customers. Management believes there is a greater likelihood
of customer loyalty to Intermedia if the customer uses multiple services. In all
cases, Intermedia utilizes its initial service relationship with a customer to
cross-sell the other components of its fully integrated services portfolio.

To reach its targeted customers, Intermedia will continue to expand into
new territories and further penetrate markets previously accessed. Intermedia
expects to continue to gain market share by following its segmentation approach
and focusing on the geographic areas where it can attain critical mass and
economies of scale.

NETWORK

In years past, simply owning fiber optic network transport created a
franchise. As network transport has become a commodity, Intermedia has focused
on those aspects of the service that remain as differentiators, retaining the
highest franchise value. Key among today's franchise points are connections to
customers and building entries. These connections provide Intermedia with the
platform to sell a variety of services to existing and additional potential
customers within a building. Intermedia believes that its deployment of
switching technology and advanced network electronics enables the Company to
better configure its network to provide cost-effective and customized solutions
to its customers.

Intermedia has the ability to lease network capacity from other carriers at
competitive rates. This has led Intermedia to lease network capacity in various
city markets prior to, or as an economical alternative to, building such
capacity. In addition, Intermedia intends to use unbundled ILEC network elements
to provide rapid market entry and develop its customer base in advance of
capital deployment. With network transport becoming a commodity, Intermedia
believes that control of the transport is a critical success factor, but that
ownership of these facilities is not mandatory. Utilizing leased facilities
enables Intermedia to (i) meet customers' needs more rapidly; (ii) improve the
utilization of Intermedia's existing network; (iii) add revenue producing
customers before building out its network, thereby reducing the risks associated
with speculative network construction or emerging technologies; and (iv)
subsequently focus its capital expenditures in geographic areas where network
construction or acquisition will provide a competitive advantage and clear
economic benefit. Intermedia focuses its capital deployment on the segments of
its infrastructure that it believes will provide the highest revenue and cash
flow potential and the greatest long-term competitive advantage. This prudent
capital deployment strategy has provided Intermedia with a high level of revenue
per dollar of gross plant, property and equipment, achieving revenue of $0.63
per dollar of gross plant, property and equipment (calculated as an average of
gross plant, property and equipment balances as of the years ended December 31,
1997 and 1998)for the year ended December 31, 1998.

In those markets where Intermedia chooses to deploy broadband fiber, the
Company's strategy is to deploy these network facilities to reach two sets of
targets: (i) the ILEC central offices to which the majority of that market's
business access lines connect; and (ii) the office buildings, office parks or
other such high concentrations of business access lines and potential business
customers. By using this approach, the Company is able to expend the least
capital to reach the greatest number of customers and prospects. Facilities
constructed in this manner may also be combined with facilities leased from
another provider.

As of December 31, 1998, the Company had fiber optic networks in service in
Orlando, Tampa, Miami, St. Petersburg, Jacksonville, Gainesville, Daytona, Ft.
Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida; Atlanta, Georgia; Cincinnati, Ohio;
Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina; Huntsville, Alabama; and St. Louis, Missouri.
8
<PAGE> 11

Intermedia continues to expand these networks as needed to reach customers and
targeted ILEC central offices. Intermedia's 14 city-based networks generally are
comprised of fiber optic cables, integrated switching facilities, advanced
electronics, data switching equipment, transmission equipment and associated
wiring and equipment. Intermedia also utilizes certain wireless technologies as
a part of its provision of services. Intermedia owns a long-haul microwave
transmission system comprising approximately 5,000 route miles in the Northeast,
which is principally used for transporting digital interexchange trunking and
analog video signals.

The Company has undertaken a significant network expansion to satisfy the
demands of its market driven growth in voice and data offerings. The Company has
deployed resources, primarily switching equipment, to develop an extensive
network to provide these services. Excess capacity on this primarily leased
network can be used to provide incremental telecommunications services such as
interexchange long distance services.

Intermedia has deployed a backbone network that is being upgraded to allow
all network applications, voice and data, to be carried over a single
infrastructure utilizing an IP based architecture. Intermedia believes that
extending IP based transport and switching to the edges of its network will
provide for both economic advantage and innovative service offerings. A single
access circuit carrying voice and data traffic in packets from the customer
location to the Intermedia network can replace several less efficient circuits.
Once a packet reaches the Intermedia network, it can be efficiently switched and
transported through the IP backbone network, and converted by strategically
placed gateways only when needed to interface with the public telephone network.

Intermedia believes that the deployment of a Packet/Cell Switching network
will allow it to achieve a cost of service advantage over the ILECs, whose
substantial size advantage over Intermedia is offset in part by their inability
to replace their entire network fabric with one such as Intermedia's integrated
platform. Intermedia's IP based switches can handle approximately ten times as
many calls as a voice switch and costs approximately one tenth as much as a
voice switch, yielding a cost reduction of up to 99% for the switching
components of local telephone calls, compared to the traditional switching
method. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had deployed IP based ATM switches
in 24 cities across the United States.

The combination of the Company's city-based networks and its intercity
capacity comprise the seamless network platform which enables Intermedia to
offer its broad array of telecommunications services to its customers.
Intermedia continues to explore emerging technologies (including direct dense
wave division multiplexing) and new applications of existing technologies
(including digital subscriber lines) which will allow it to: (i) rationalize its
fiber backbone; (ii) reduce overall cost; and (iii) provide maximum flexibility
in the utilization of its network infrastructure.

Intermedia believes that an important aspect of satisfying its customers is
its ability to provide and support services from end to end. This requires
network interconnection with other carriers and operational support systems and
tools to "manage" the customer's total service. Intermedia has entered into
interconnection co-carrier agreements with all relevant carriers in its service
territory. Intermedia has also interconnected its frame relay network to various
ILECs, thereby substantially expanding the reach of its enhanced data services.
Intermedia now provides originating and terminating transport services in all 50
states and maintains points of presence for interexchange and enhanced data
services in most major cities in the United States. Intermedia has deployed, and
continues to integrate, network monitoring and control tools to insure high
levels of service quality and reliability. Among these, Intermedia's
ViewSPAN(SM) service allows the Company and its frame relay network service
customers to have full end to end visibility of network performance, even across
interconnections with other carrier's networks.

In addition, Intermedia has pioneered the interconnection of its frame
relay network with those of the ILECs, allowing pervasive, cost-efficient
termination for its customers. Over 680 such NNIs have been implemented,
including those with BellSouth, US West, Sprint, GTE, Bell Atlantic and SNET.
Intermedia has such NNIs in over 85% of the nation's Local Access Transport
Areas ("LATAs"). A LATA is a geographic area in which a local exchange carrier
is permitted to offer switched telecommunications services, including long
distance (local toll).

The Company's telecommunications equipment vendors actively participate in
planning and developing electronic equipment for use in Intermedia's network.
The Company does not believe it is dependent on any single vendor for equipment.
Because the Company uses existing telecommunications technology rather than
developing it, Intermedia's research and development expenditures are not
material.

INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Intermedia believes the information systems that support its business
constitute a key aspect of its customer support services. Intermedia's business
processes, including accepting a service order, implementing the service,
providing ongoing technical and customer support and invoicing and collecting
payment for the service are a highly repetitive, data-oriented set of tasks. By
creating a flexible, unified database and establishing industry standards-based
software, Intermedia expects to allow all customer support functions (order
entry, billing, service implementation, network management, etc.) efficient
access to data. Management believes that external applications, such as those
used by acquired firms and systems that will be used by the ILECs for service
orders and billing, will have the ability to interface with and interact with
this information systems structure and that this integrated system will enhance
Intermedia's ability to deliver and support an integrated package of services.
Intermedia believes this architecture will offer cost performance, flexibility
and scalability that will support its rapid growth, provide for high staff
productivity, and support its strategy of offering fully integrated services to
its customers.

COMPETITION

Intermedia faces significant competition in each of its four service
categories: local services, enhanced services, long distance services and
integration services.

Intermedia believes that various legislative initiatives, including the
Telecommunications Act, have removed many of the remaining legislative barriers
to local exchange competition. Rules adopted to carry out the provisions of the
Telecommunications Act, however, remain subject to pending administrative and
judicial proceedings which could materially affect local exchange competition.
Moreover, in light of the passage of the Telecommunications Act, regulators are
also likely to provide ILECs with increased pricing flexibility as competition
increases. If ILECs are permitted to lower their rates substantially or engage
in excessive volume or term discount pricing practices for their customers, the
net income or cash flow of integrated communication providers and CLECs,
including Intermedia, could be materially adversely affected. In addition, while
Intermedia currently competes with AT&T, MCI WorldCom, Sprint and others in the
interexchange services (commonly referred to as long distance) market, the
Telecommunications Act permits the RBOCs to provide long distance service in the
same areas they are now providing local service once certain criteria are met.
Once the RBOCs begin to provide such services, they will be in a position to
offer single source local and long distance service similar to that being
offered by Intermedia. Furthermore, through acquisitions, AT&T and the former
MCI have entered the local exchange services market, and other interexchange
carriers ("IXCs") have announced their intent to enter the local exchange
services market which is facilitated by the Telecommunications Act's requirement
that ILECs permit others to use their local exchange facilities to provide
service to customers. Intermedia cannot predict the number of competitors that
will emerge as a result of existing or new federal and state regulatory or
legislative actions but increased competition with respect to interexchange
services and local exchange services from existing and new entities could have a
material adverse effect on Intermedia's business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects.

Competition in each of the service categories provided by Intermedia is
discussed below.

10
<PAGE> 13

Local Network Services. In each of its geographic markets, Intermedia
faces significant competition for the local services it offers from RBOCs and
other ILECs, which currently maintain dominant market shares in their local
telecommunications markets. These companies all have long-standing relationships
with their customers and have financial, personnel and technical resources
substantially greater than those of Intermedia. Some of these companies also
have indicated their intent to offer services as CLECs in markets outside of
their current territory.

Intermedia also faces competition in most markets in which it operates from
one or more CLECs or integrated communication providers operating fiber optic
networks. Other local service providers without their own fiber networks have
operations or are initiating operations within one or more of Intermedia's
service areas. MCI WorldCom, AT&T and certain cable television providers, either
alone or jointly with AT&T or another carrier, have entered some or all of the
markets that Intermedia presently serves. Intermedia also understands that other
telecommunications companies have indicated their desire to enter the local
exchange services market within specific metropolitan areas served or targeted
by Intermedia. Other potential competitors of Intermedia include utility
companies, other long distance carriers, wireless carriers and private networks
built by individual business customers. Many of these entities are substantially
larger and have substantially greater financial resources than Intermedia.
Intermedia cannot predict the number of competitors that will emerge as a result
of existing or any new federal and state regulatory or legislative actions.

Competition in all of Intermedia's geographic market areas is based on
quality, reliability, customer service and responsiveness, service features and
price. Intermedia has kept its prices at levels competitive with those of the
ILECs while providing, in the opinion of Intermedia, a higher level of service
and responsiveness to its customers.

Although the ILECs are generally subject to greater pricing and regulatory
constraints than other local network service providers, ILECs, as noted above,
are achieving increased pricing flexibility for their local services as a result
of recent legislative and regulatory action designed to increase competition in
the local exchange market. The ILECs have continued to lower rates, resulting in
downward pressure on the price of certain dedicated and switched access
transport offered by Intermedia and other CLECs. This price erosion has
decreased operating margins for these services. However, Intermedia believes
this effect will be more than offset by the increased revenues available as a
result of access to customers provided through Intermedia's interconnection
co-carrier agreements (see "Agreements") and the opening of local exchange
service to competition. In addition, Intermedia believes that lower rates for
dedicated access will benefit other services offered by Intermedia.

Enhanced Data Services. Intermedia faces competition in its high-speed
data services business from IXCs, very small aperture terminal ("VSAT")
providers, ILECs and other telecommunications companies. Many of Intermedia's
existing and potential competitors have financial and other resources
significantly greater than those of Intermedia.

Intermedia competes with the larger IXCs on the basis of service
responsiveness and a rapid response to technology and service trends, and a
regional focus borne of early market successes. All of the major IXCs, including
AT&T, MCI WorldCom and Sprint, offer frame relay, ATM and IP based transport
services, and several of the major IXCs have announced plans to provide Internet
services. Intermedia believes it competes favorably with these providers in its
markets, based on the features and functions of its services, the high density
of its networks, its relatively greater experience and its in-house expertise.
Continued aggressive pricing is expected to support continued rapid growth, but
will place increasing pressure on operating margins.

Intermedia also competes with VSAT services which deliver data by satellite
on the basis of price and data capacity. Intermedia believes that the relatively
low bandwidth of each VSAT terminal and the cost of purchasing and installing
VSAT equipment limits the ability of VSAT providers to compete with the frame
relay services provided by Intermedia.

Many of the ILECs now offer services similar to Intermedia's enhanced data
services. Because the RBOCs have not yet been authorized to provide
interexchange service inside the regions where they provide local exchange
service, they may offer these services only on an intraLATA basis within their
operating

11
<PAGE> 14

regions. Out-of-region RBOCs may also offer these services on an interLATA
basis. While the RBOCs generally cannot interconnect their frame relay networks
with each other, Intermedia has interconnected its frame relay network with
those of various RBOCs. As a result, Intermedia can use certain RBOC services to
keep its own costs down when distributing into areas that cannot be more
economically serviced on its own network. Intermedia expects the RBOCs to
aggressively expand their enhanced data services as regulatory developments
permit them to deploy in-region interLATA long distance networks. When the RBOCs
are permitted to provide such services, they will be in a position to offer
single source service similar to that being offered by Intermedia. As part of
its various interconnection agreements, Intermedia has negotiated favorable
rates for unbundled ILEC frame relay service elements. Intermedia expects such
negotiations to decrease its costs, improving margins for this service.

Intermedia faces competition in its Internet services and Web hosting
business from various technology and Internet related companies, certain of
which have financial and other resources significantly greater than those of
Intermedia. Intermedia competes in this highly competitive market based on its
broad technical expertise, strong customer service and value-added applications.

Long Distance Services. Intermedia currently competes with AT&T, MCI
WorldCom, Sprint and others in the long distance services market. Many of
Intermedia's competitors have longstanding relationships with their customers
and have financial, personnel and technical resources substantially greater than
those of Intermedia. When, as expected, the RBOCs are permitted to provide long
distance services within their operating regions they may provide substantial
new competition to long distance providers. In providing interexchange services,
Intermedia focuses on quality, service and price to distinguish itself in a very
competitive marketplace and has built a loyal customer base by emphasizing its
customer service. The additional new services that are offered as Intermedia
expands its local exchange services offerings to additional markets should
further support this position by allowing Intermedia to market a wide array of
fully integrated telecommunications services. While these services are subject
to highly competitive pricing pressures, Intermedia's cost to provide these
services is decreasing as it deploys more local/long distance voice switches and
interexchange network facilities.

Integration Services. Intermedia faces competition in its systems
integration business from equipment manufacturers, RBOCs and other ILECs, long
distance carriers and systems integrators, many of which have financial and
other resources significantly greater than those of Intermedia. Intermedia
competes in this market on the basis of its broad based technical expertise and
strong customer service.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Overview. Intermedia's telecommunications services are subject to varying
degrees of federal, state and local regulation. The FCC and state utility
commissions regulate telecommunications common carriers. A telecommunications
common carrier is a company which offers telecommunications services to the
public or to all prospective users on standardized rates and terms. Intermedia's
local exchange, interexchange and international and frame relay services are all
common carrier services. Intermedia's systems integration business and Internet
services are not considered to be common carrier services, although regulatory
treatment of Internet service is evolving and it may become subject, at least in
part, to some form of common carrier regulation.

The FCC exercises jurisdiction over telecommunications common carriers, and
their facilities and services, to the extent they are providing interstate or
international communications. International authorities also may seek to
regulate international telecommunications services originating in the United
States. The various state regulatory commissions retain jurisdiction over
telecommunications carriers, and their facilities and services, to the extent
they are used to provide communications that originate and terminate within the
same state. The degree of regulation varies from state to state.

In recent years, the regulation of the telecommunications industry has been
in a state of flux as the United States Congress and various state legislatures
have passed laws seeking to foster greater competition in telecommunications
markets. The FCC and state utility commissions have adopted many new rules to
implement this legislation and encourage competition. These changes, which are
still incomplete, have created
12
<PAGE> 15

new opportunities and challenges for Intermedia and its competitors. The
following summary of regulatory developments and legislation does not purport to
describe all present and proposed federal, state and local regulations and
legislation affecting the telecommunications industry. Certain of these and
other existing federal and state regulations are currently the subject of
judicial proceedings, legislative hearings and administrative proposals which
could change, in varying degrees, the manner in which this industry operates.
Neither the outcome of these proceedings, nor their impact upon the
telecommunications industry or Intermedia can be predicted at this time.

Federal Regulation. Although Intermedia is currently not subject to price
cap or rate of return regulation at the federal level and is not currently
required to obtain FCC authorization for the installation, acquisition or
operation of its domestic interexchange network facilities, it nevertheless must
comply with the requirements of common carriage under the Communications Act of
1934 (the "Communications Act"), as amended. Pursuant to the Communications Act,
Intermedia is subject to the general requirement that its charges and
regulations for communications services must be "just and reasonable" and that
it may not make any "unjust or unreasonable discrimination" in its charges or
regulations. Carriers such as Intermedia also are subject to a variety of
miscellaneous regulations that, for instance, govern the documentation and
verifications necessary to change a consumer's long distance carrier, require
the filing of periodic reports, and restrict interlocking directors and
management. Certain other specific regulations applicable to Intermedia are
discussed below. The FCC also has jurisdiction to act upon complaints against
any common carrier for failure to comply with its statutory obligations. The
Communications Act also requires prior approval for the assignment of an FCC
radio license, such as the microwave licenses Intermedia holds, and for the
assignment of an authorization to provide international service (but not
domestic interexchange service) or the transfer of control (for example, through
the sale of stock) of a company holding radio licenses or an international
authorization. The FCC generally has the authority to modify or terminate a
common carrier's authority to provide domestic interexchange or international
service for failure to comply with federal laws or the rules of the FCC. Fines
or other penalties also may be imposed for such violations.

Comprehensive amendments to the Communications Act were made by the
Telecommunications Act, which was signed into law on February 8, 1996. The
Telecommunications Act effected plenary changes in regulation at both the
federal and state levels that affect virtually every segment of the
telecommunications industry. The stated purpose of the Telecommunications Act is
to promote competition in all areas of telecommunications. While it will take
years for the industry to feel the full impact of the Telecommunications Act, it
is already clear that the legislation provides Intermedia with both new
opportunities and new challenges.

The Telecommunications Act greatly expands the FCC's interconnection
requirements on the ILECs. The Telecommunications Act requires the ILECs to: (i)
provide physical collocation, which allows companies such as Intermedia and
other interconnectors to install and maintain their own network termination
equipment in ILEC central offices, and virtual collocation only if requested or
if physical collocation is demonstrated to be technically infeasible; (ii)
unbundle components of their local service networks so that other providers of
local service can compete for a wider range of local services customers; (iii)
establish "wholesale" rates for their services to promote resale by CLECs and
other competitors; (iv) establish number portability, which will allow a
customer to retain its existing phone number if it switches from the ILEC to a
competitive local service provider; (v) establish dialing parity, which ensures
that customers will not detect a quality difference in dialing telephone numbers
or accessing operators or emergency services; and (vi) provide nondiscriminatory
access to telephone poles, ducts, conduits and rights-of-way. In addition, the
Telecommunications Act requires ILECs to compensate competitive carriers for
traffic originated by the ILECs and terminated on the competitive carriers'
networks.

The FCC is charged with establishing national guidelines to implement
certain portions of the Telecommunications Act. The FCC issued its
Interconnection Order on August 8, 1996. On July 18, 1997, however, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a decision vacating the
FCC's pricing rules, as well as certain other portions of the FCC's
interconnection rules, on the grounds that the FCC had improperly intruded into
matters reserved for state jurisdiction. On January 25, 1999, the Supreme Court
largely reversed the Eighth Circuit's order, holding that the FCC has general
jurisdiction to implement the
13
<PAGE> 16

local competition provisions of the Telecommunications Act. In so doing, the
Supreme Court stated that the FCC has authority to set pricing guidelines for
unbundled network elements, to prevent ILECs from disaggregating existing
combinations of network elements, and to establish "pick and choose" rules
regarding interconnection agreements (which would permit a carrier seeking
interconnection to "pick and choose" among the terms of service from various
other interconnection agreements between the ILECs and other CLECs). This action
reestablishes the validity of many of the FCC rules vacated by the Eighth
Circuit. Although the Supreme Court affirmed the FCC's authority to develop
pricing guidelines, the Supreme Court did not evaluate the specific pricing
methodology adopted by the FCC and has remanded the case to the Eighth Circuit
for further consideration. In its decision, however, the Supreme Court also
vacated the FCC's rule that identifies the unbundled network elements that ILECs
must provide to CLECs. The Supreme Court found that the FCC had not adequately
considered certain statutory criteria for requiring ILECs to make those network
elements available to CLECs and must reexamine the matter. Thus, while the
Supreme Court resolved many issues, including the FCC's jurisdictional
authority, other issues remain subject to further consideration by the courts
and the FCC, and the Company cannot predict the ultimate disposition of those
matters. The possible impact of this decision, including the portion dealing
with unbundled network elements, on existing interconnection agreements between
ILECs and CLECs or on agreements that may be negotiated in the future also
cannot be determined at this time.

As a result of the pro-competitive provisions of the Telecommunications
Act, the Company has taken the steps necessary to be a provider of local
exchange services and has positioned itself as a full service, integrated
telecommunications services provider. The Company has obtained local
certification in 37 states and the District of Columbia. In addition, Intermedia
has successfully negotiated local exchange service interconnection agreements
with nine ILECs.

The Telecommunications Act's interconnection requirements also apply to
interexchange carriers and to all other providers of telecommunications
services, although the terms and conditions for interconnection provided by
these carriers are not regulated as strictly as interconnection provided by the
ILECs. This may provide the Company with the ability to reduce its access costs
by interconnecting directly with non-ILECs, but may also cause the Company to
incur additional administrative and regulatory expenses in replying to
interconnection requests from other carriers.

As part of its pro-competitive policies, the Telecommunications Act frees
the RBOCs from the judicial orders that prohibited their provision of interLATA
services. Specifically, the Telecommunications Act permits RBOCs to provide long
distance services outside their local service regions immediately, and will
permit them to provide in-region interLATA service upon demonstrating to the FCC
and state regulatory agencies that they have adhered to the FCC's local exchange
service interconnection regulations. Some RBOCs have filed applications with
various state public utility commissions and the FCC seeking approval to offer
in-region interLATA service. Some states have denied these applications while
others have approved them. However, to date, even where the RBOCs' applications
have received state approval, the FCC has denied each of the RBOCs' applications
brought before it because it found that the RBOC had not sufficiently made its
local network available to competitors. The FCC is also considering an RBOC
proposal to permit RBOCs to offer immediately high speed, interLATA data
services within their operating regions if they do so through a separate
subsidiary, without first having to demonstrate that they have adhered to the
FCC interconnection regulations discussed above.

Two RBOCs, US West and Ameritech, entered into "teaming agreements" with
Qwest Communications International, Inc. ("Qwest"), whereby the RBOCs would
solicit customers for Qwest's long distance service and handle billing of those
customers in exchange for a fee. These agreements would have permitted the RBOCs
to offer their local customers a package of local and long distance services in
competition with the Company's offerings even though the RBOCs would not
themselves be providing the long distance component. Certain IXCs requested the
FCC to block the proposed arrangement and initiated litigation in federal
courts. The courts, at the request of the FCC, referred the question of the
legality of the agreements under the Telecommunications Act to the FCC. On
October 7, 1998, the FCC released a decision holding that these agreements were
an improper attempt by the RBOCs to provide interLATA service that would be
inconsistent with the Telecommunications Act. The FCC's decision has been
appealed to the federal courts.
14
<PAGE> 17

The Company is unable to predict the final outcome of this matter or the nature
of any policies the FCC may adopt relating to other types of agreements between
RBOCs and carriers other than Qwest.

The FCC has established different levels of regulation for dominant and
non-dominant carriers. Of domestic common carrier service providers, only GTE,
the RBOCs and other ILECs are classified as dominant carriers, and all other
providers of domestic common carrier services, including Intermedia, are
classified as non-dominant carriers. The Telecommunications Act provides the FCC
with the authority to forebear from imposing any regulations it deems
unnecessary, including requiring non-dominant carriers to file tariffs. On
November 1, 1996, in its first major exercise of regulatory forbearance
authority granted by the Telecommunications Act, the FCC issued an order
detariffing domestic interexchange services. The order required mandatory
detariffing and gave carriers such as Intermedia nine months to withdraw federal
tariffs and move to contractual relationships with their customers. This order
subsequently was stayed by a federal appeals court, and it is unclear at this
time whether the detariffing order will be implemented. Until further action is
taken by the FCC or the courts, Intermedia will continue to maintain tariffs for
these services. In June 1997, the FCC issued another order stating that
non-dominant carriers, such as Intermedia, could withdraw their tariffs for
interstate access services. While the Company has no immediate plans to withdraw
its tariff, this FCC order allows the Company to do so. The FCC does require the
Company to obtain authority to provide service between the United States and
foreign points and to file tariffs on an ongoing basis for international
service.

The Telecommunications Act also directs the FCC, in cooperation with state
regulators, to establish a Universal Service Fund that will provide subsidies to
carriers that provide service to under-served individuals and in high cost
areas. A portion of carriers' contributions to the Universal Service Fund also
will be used to provide telecommunications related facilities for schools,
libraries and certain rural health care providers. The FCC released its order in
June 1997. This order will require Intermedia to contribute to the Universal
Service Fund, but may also allow Intermedia to receive payments from the Fund if
it is deemed eligible. Intermedia also may provide service to under-served
customers in lieu of making Universal Service Fund payments. Intermedia's 1998
contribution resulting from these regulations is estimated to be $750,000 to
$1.5 million. For the four quarters of 1998, the FCC established payment rates
for all interexchange carriers, including the Company, that amount to 3% to 4%
of eligible intrastate, interstate, and international long distance service
revenues. The rate established for the first quarter of 1999 is 3.76%. The FCC
allows all interexchange carriers, including the Company, to recover the
international and interstate portions of these payments by passing the charges
through to their customers.

The FCC's implementation of universal service requirements remains subject
to judicial and additional FCC review. Additional changes to the universal
service regime, which would increase Intermedia's costs, could have adverse
consequences for the Company.

A dispute has arisen over the provision of the Telecommunications Act
requiring ILECs to compensate CLECs for local calls originating on the ILEC's
network but terminating on the CLEC's network. Most ILECs argue that they are
not obligated to pay CLECs -- including Intermedia -- for local calls made to
Internet service providers. This dispute has resulted in two ILECs withholding
approximately $46.0 million in payments to Intermedia through December 31, 1998.
Recently, Intermedia and other CLECs have asked state regulatory commissions to
resolve this dispute. To date, 29 state commissions and three federal courts
have ruled on the issue finding that ILECs must pay compensation to competitive
carriers for local calls to Internet service providers located on competitive
carriers' networks. A number of other state commissions currently have
proceedings pending to consider this matter, and ILECs and CLECs are in the
process of attempting to pursue the matter at the FCC, in federal courts and
before Congress.

On May 16, 1997, the FCC released an order that fundamentally restructured
the "access charges" that ILECs charge to interexchange carriers and end user
customers to connect to the ILEC's network. Intermedia believes that the FCC's
new access charge rules do not adversely affect Intermedia's business plans, and
that they in fact present significant new opportunities for new entrants,
including Intermedia. Aspects of the access charge order may be changed in the
future. Appeals by numerous parties were denied by the Eighth Circuit Court of
Appeals on August 19, 1998.

15
<PAGE> 18

State Regulation. To the extent that Intermedia provides
telecommunications services which originate and terminate within the same state,
it is subject to the jurisdiction of that state's public service commissions.
Intermedia currently provides some intrastate telecommunication services in all
50 states and is subject to varying degrees of regulation by the public service
commissions of those states. Intermedia is currently certificated (or
certification is not required) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to
provide interexchange services. Intermedia is certified as a CLEC in 37 states
and the District of Columbia. Intermedia is constantly evaluating the
competitive environment and may seek to further expand its intrastate
certifications into additional jurisdictions. Intermedia is not subject to price
cap or rate of return regulation in any state in which it is currently
certificated to provide local exchange service.

The Telecommunications Act preempts state statutes and regulations that
restrict the provision of competitive local services. As a result of this
sweeping legislation, Intermedia will be free to provide the full range of
intrastate local and long distance services in all states in which it currently
operates, and in any states into which it may wish to expand. While this action
greatly increases Intermedia's addressable customer base, it also increases the
amount of competition to which Intermedia may be subject.

Although the Telecommunications Act's prohibition of state barriers to
competitive entry took effect on February 8, 1996, various legal and policy
matters still must be resolved before the Telecommunications Act's policies
promoting local competition are fully implemented. Intermedia continues to
support efforts at the state government level to encourage competition in its
markets under the federal law and to permit integrated communication providers
and CLECs to operate on the same basis and with the same rights as the ILECs.
Despite the still uncertain regulatory environment, Intermedia has been
successful in its pursuit of local certificates from state commissions and in
negotiating interconnection agreements with the ILECs which permit Intermedia to
meet its business objectives.

In most states, Intermedia is required to file tariffs setting forth the
terms, conditions and prices for services classified as intrastate (local,
interexchange and frame relay). Most states require Intermedia to list the
services provided and the specific rate for each service. Under different forms
of regulatory flexibility, Intermedia may be allowed to set price ranges for
specific services, and in some cases, prices may be set on an individual
customer basis. Some states also require Intermedia to seek the approval of the
local public service commission for the issuance of debt or equity securities or
other transactions which would result in a lien on Intermedia's property used to
provide intrastate service within those states. Many states also require
approval for the sale or acquisition of another telecommunications company and
require the filing of reports and payments of various fees. Like the FCC, most
states also consider complaints relating to a carrier's intrastate services or
rates.

As Intermedia expands its operations into other states, it may become
subject to the jurisdiction of their respective public service commissions for
certain services offered by Intermedia. Intermedia does not believe that its
relationship with Latin American or other international service providers
currently subjects it to (or will subject it to) regulation outside the United
States.

Local Government Authorizations. Intermedia may be required to obtain from
municipal authorities street opening and construction permits to install and
expand its fiber optic networks in certain cities. In some cities, local
partners or subcontractors may already possess the requisite authorizations to
construct or expand Intermedia's network.

In some of the areas where Intermedia provides service, it may be subject
to municipal franchise requirements and may be required to pay license or
franchise fees based on a percentage of gross revenue or other formula. There
are no assurances that certain municipalities that do not currently impose fees
will not seek to impose fees in the future, nor is there any assurance that,
following the expiration of existing franchises, fees will remain at their
current levels. In many markets, other companies providing local
telecommunications services, particularly the ILECs, currently are excused from
paying license or franchise fees or pay fees that are materially lower than
those required to be paid by Intermedia. The Telecommunications Act requires
municipalities to charge nondiscriminatory fees to all telecommunications
providers, but it is uncertain how quickly this requirement will be implemented
by particular municipalities in which Intermedia operates or plans to operate or
whether it will be implemented without a legal challenge initiated
16
<PAGE> 19

by Intermedia or another integrated communications provider or CLEC. If any of
Intermedia's existing network agreements were terminated prior to their
expiration date and Intermedia was forced to remove its fiber optic cables from
the streets or abandon its network in place, even with compensation, such
termination could have a material adverse effect on Intermedia.

Intermedia also must obtain licenses to attach facilities to utility poles
to build and expand facilities. Because utilities that are owned by cooperatives
or municipalities are not subject to federal pole attachment regulation, there
is no assurance that Intermedia will be able to obtain pole attachment from
these utilities at reasonable rates, terms and conditions.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 1998, Intermedia employed a total of 3,931 employees.
The Company anticipates that the number of employees will increase throughout
1999. The Company believes that its future success will depend in large part on
its continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified
personnel. The Company also regularly uses the services of contract technicians
for the installation and maintenance of its network. Intermedia believes that
its relations with its employees are good.

RISK FACTORS

SUBSTANTIAL DEBT

Substantial Debt. We have a significant amount of debt. At December 31,
1998, we had outstanding approximately $2.6 billion of debt and other
liabilities (including trade payables) and approximately $862.3 million of
obligations with respect to four outstanding series of preferred stock. As a
result, we will be required to pay cash interest of approximately $100.1 million
in 1999 on our outstanding notes. This amount will increase in 2001 and again in
2002 when certain of our outstanding debt which does not currently pay cash
interest begins to pay cash interest. This amount will also increase if the
recently announced offering of Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes is
completed.

Insufficient Cash Flow. We do not generate enough cash flow to cover our
operating and investing expenses. Our historical earnings have been insufficient
to cover combined fixed charges and dividends on preferred stock by $245.7
million for the year ended December 31, 1997 and $584.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 1998. Combined fixed charges and dividends include interest
and dividends, whether paid or accrued. On a pro forma basis, after giving
applicable effect to the acquisitions of Shared, National and LDS and each of
our 1997 and 1998 debt and equity offerings as if they had been consummated at
the beginning of the year, our earnings would be insufficient to cover combined
fixed charges and dividends on preferred stock by $489.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 1997 and $602.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1998.
This deficiency will increase if the recently announced offering of Senior Notes
and Senior Subordinated Notes is completed. We expect this situation will
continue for the next several years. Therefore, unless we develop additional
sources of cash flow, we may not be able to pay interest on our debt and
dividends on our preferred stock or repay our obligations at maturity. As an
alternative, we may refinance all or a portion of our outstanding debt. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance our debt or develop
additional sources of cash flow.

Possible Additional Debt. While the terms of our outstanding debt limit
the additional debt we may incur, they do not prohibit us from incurring more
debt. We may incur substantial additional debt, including the recently announced
offering of Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes, during the next few
years to finance the construction of networks and purchase of network
electronics, including local/long distance voice and data switches, to finance
business acquisitions, or for general corporate purposes, including to fund
working capital and operating losses.

17
<PAGE> 20

Consequences of Debt. Our level of debt could have important consequences
to holders of our Common Stock. For example, it could:

- require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our future cash flow from
operations to the payment of the principal and interest on our debt, and
dividends on and the redemption of our preferred stock, thereby reducing
the funds available for other business purposes;

- make us more vulnerable if there is a downturn in our business;

- limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital,
capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes; and

- place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors who have
less debt than we do.

HISTORY OF NET LOSSES; LIMITED OPERATIONS OF CERTAIN SERVICES; NEED FOR
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL

History of Net Losses. We have incurred significant operating losses
during the past several years while we have developed our business and expanded
our networks. Although our revenues have increased in each of the last three
years, we have incurred net losses attributable to common stockholders of
approximately $57.2 million, $284.9 million and $577.6 million for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. We expect net losses to
continue for the next several years.

Limited Operations of Certain Services. We began operations in 1986.
Substantially all of our revenues are derived from local, long distance,
enhanced data and integration services. We have recently initiated many of these
services or expanded their availability in new market areas. We also expect to
substantially increase the size of our operations in the near future. Therefore,
you have limited historical financial information upon which to base your
evaluation of our performance and our ability to compete successfully in the
telecommunications business.

Need for Additional Capital. We require significant amounts of capital to
expand our existing networks and services and to develop new networks and
services. In addition, we may need additional capital in order to repay our
outstanding debts when they become due. See "Substantial Debt." We expect to
fund our capital needs by using available cash, joint ventures, debt or equity
financing, credit availability and internally generated funds. Assuming that we
complete the proposed offering of Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes, we
expect that during the second half of 2000 we will need to raise additional
capital to continue expanding our business. However, our future capital needs
depend upon a number of factors, certain of which we can control (such as
marketing expenses, staffing levels and customer growth) and others which we
cannot control (such as competitive conditions, government regulation and
capital costs). Moreover, our outstanding debt and preferred stock restrict our
ability to incur additional debt or issue additional preferred stock. Depending
on market conditions, we may decide to raise additional capital earlier.
However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in raising sufficient
debt or equity on terms that we will consider acceptable. If we cannot generate
sufficient funds or if the proposed offering of Senior Notes and Senior
Subordinated Notes is not completed, we may be required to delay or abandon some
of our planned expansion or expenditures. This likely would affect our growth
and our ability to repay our outstanding debt as well as the Notes at maturity.

LACK OF DIVIDEND HISTORY

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock, and
we do not expect to declare any such dividends in the foreseeable future.
Payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital
requirements, our debt facilities and other factors. We intend to retain any of
our earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. In
addition, the terms of our outstanding debt and preferred stock restrict the
payment of dividends on Common Stock. We may also establish a bank credit
facility which may contain additional dividend restrictions.

18
<PAGE> 21

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUISITIONS AND EXPANSION

Recent Acquisitions. In 1998, we acquired Shared, LDS and National. These
acquisitions diverted our resources and management time and require further
integration with our existing networks and services. We expensed $53.5 million
of business restructuring, integration and other charges during 1998. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Overview." We cannot assure you we will successfully integrate the
operations of these acquired entities into our operations; all of the
anticipated benefits from the restructuring program will be realized; or the
restructuring program will not be more expensive or take longer than
anticipated. If we cannot successfully integrate the acquisitions and realize
the benefits of the restructuring program, we may have difficulty generating
sufficient funds to repay the Notes.

Possible Future Acquisitions or Dispositions. Consistent with our
strategy, we are currently evaluating and often engage in discussions regarding
various acquisition or disposition opportunities. However, we have not reached
any agreement or agreement in principle to effect any material acquisition or
disposition. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify, finance and
complete suitable acquisition opportunities on acceptable terms. Any future
acquisitions could be funded with cash on hand and/or by issuing additional
securities. It is possible that one or more of such possible future acquisitions
or dispositions, if completed, could adversely affect our funds from operations
or cash available for distribution, in the short term, in the long term or both,
or increase our debt, or could be followed by a decline in the market value of
our outstanding securities, including the Notes.

Failure to Obtain Third Party Consents in Connection with an Acquisition or
Merger. We consummated a number of acquisitions over the past two years,
including the acquisitions of Shared, LDS and National. We may not have obtained
or, as in the case of the acquisition of Shared, may have elected not to seek,
and in connection with future acquisitions may elect not to seek, all required
consents from third parties with respect to acquired contracts. While the
failure to obtain required third party consents does not give rise to an action
to rescind the acquisition or merger, the third party could assert a breach of
the acquired contract. We believe the failure to obtain any such third party
consents should not result in any material adverse consequences. However, we
cannot assure you that no material adverse consequences will result from any
such breach of contract claims.

Expansion Risk. We have expanded rapidly and expect this rapid expansion
to continue in the near future. This growth has increased our operating
complexity, as well as the level of responsibility for both existing and new
management personnel. In order to manage our expansion effectively, we must
continue to implement and improve our operational and financial systems and
expand, train and manage our employee base.

Need to Obtain Permits and Rights-of-Way to Implement Network
Expansion. We are continuing to expand our existing networks to pursue market
opportunities. To expand our networks requires us, among other things, to
acquire rights-of-way, pole attachment agreements and any required permits and
to finance such expansion. We cannot assure you we will be able to obtain the
necessary permits, agreements or financing to expand our existing networks on a
timely basis. If we cannot expand our existing networks in accordance with our
plans, the growth of our business could be materially adversely affected.

Risk of New Service Acceptance by Customers. We have recently introduced
and will continue to introduce new services, primarily local exchange services,
which we believe are important to our long-term growth. The success of these
services will be dependent upon, among other things, the willingness of
customers to accept us as the provider of such services. The lack of such
acceptance could have a material adverse effect on the growth of our business.

Potential Diminishing Rate of Growth. During the period from 1994 through
1998, our revenues grew at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 166%
(including the effect of acquisitions). While we expect to continue to grow, as
our size increases, it is likely our rate of growth will decrease.

19
<PAGE> 22

RISKS RELATED TO INTERNET SERVICES

Maintenance of Peering Relationships. The Internet is comprised of many
Internet service providers who operate their own networks and interconnect with
other Internet service providers at various peering points. Our peering
relationships with other Internet service providers permit us to exchange
traffic with other Internet service providers without having to pay settlement
charges. Although we meet the industry's current standards for peering, we
cannot guarantee that other national Internet service providers will maintain
peering relationships with us. In addition, the requirements associated with
maintaining peering relationships with the major national Internet service
providers may change. We cannot assure you that we will be able to expand or
adapt our network infrastructure to meet any new requirements on a timely basis,
at a commercially reasonable cost, or at all.

Potential Liability of On-Line Service Providers. The law in the United
States relating to the liability of on-line service providers and Internet
service providers for information carried on, disseminated through, or hosted on
their systems is currently unsettled. If liability for materials carried on or
disseminated through their systems is imposed on Internet service providers, we
would likely implement measures to reduce our exposure to such liability. Such
measures could require us to expend substantial resources or discontinue certain
product or service offerings. In addition, increased attention on liability
issues, as a result of lawsuits, legislation and legislative proposals, could
adversely affect the growth of Internet use.

DEPENDENCE UPON NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE

To successfully market our services to business and government users, our
network infrastructure must provide superior reliability, capacity and security.
Our networks are subject to physical damage, power loss, capacity limitations,
software defects, breaches of security (by computer virus, break-ins or
otherwise) and other factors, certain of which have caused, and will continue to
cause, interruptions in service or reduced capacity for our customers.
Interruptions in service, capacity limitations or security breaches could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects.

RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES

Communications technology is changing rapidly. While we believe, for the
foreseeable future, these changes will not materially affect the continued use
of our fiber optic networks or materially hinder our ability to acquire
necessary technologies, the effect of technological changes, such as changes
relating to emerging wire-line and wireless transmission technologies, including
software protocols, on our business cannot be predicted.

COMPETITION

In each of our markets, when selling local services, we compete with
incumbent local exchange carriers ("ILECs") which currently dominate their local
telecommunications markets. ILECs have longstanding relationships with their
customers which may create competitive barriers. ILECs also may have the
potential to subsidize their competitive services from revenues they earn from
their monopoly services. We also face competition in most markets in which we
operate from one or more integrated communications providers or competitive
local exchange carriers ("CLECs"). Through acquisitions, AT&T and MCI WorldCom
have entered the local services market, and other long distance carriers have
announced their intent to enter the local services market. A continuing trend
toward business combinations and alliances in the telecommunications industry
may create significant new or larger competitors. The recent mergers of MCI and
WorldCom and of AT&T and Teleport Communications Group, Inc., as well as the
proposed mergers of AT&T and Tele-Communications, Inc., Bell Atlantic and GTE,
and Ameritech and SBC Communications, Inc. are examples of this trend.

Recent legislative initiatives, including the Telecommunications Act, have
removed many of the remaining legislative barriers to local competition. Rules
adopted to carry out the provisions of the Telecommunications Act, however,
remain subject to pending administrative and judicial proceedings. We cannot
predict the impact future regulatory developments may have on our ability to
complete. However, if
20
<PAGE> 23

ILECs are permitted to substantially lower their rates or offer significant
volume or term discount pricing, our net income and/or cash flow could be
materially adversely affected.

Our enhanced data services (including Internet) compete with services
offered by ILECs, long distance carriers, very small aperture terminal
(satellite dish) providers, Internet service providers and others. In
particular, the market for Internet services is extremely competitive, and there
are limited barriers to entry. When offering long distance services, we compete
with AT&T, MCI WorldCom, Sprint and others. The Telecommunications Act permits
the regional Bell operating companies ("RBOCs") to provide long distance
services in the same areas where they now provide local service once certain
criteria are met. Once the RBOCs begin to provide such services, they will be in
a position to offer single source local and long distance service similar to
that being offered by us. Our integration services compete with those offered by
equipment manufacturers, RBOCs and other ILECs, long distance carriers and
systems integrators.

We cannot predict the number of competitors that will emerge as a result of
existing or new federal and state regulatory or legislative actions, but
increased competition from existing and new entities could have a material
adverse effect on our business. Many of our existing and potential competitors
have financial, personnel and other resources significantly greater than ours
which could effect our ability to compete.

REGULATION

We are subject to federal, state and local regulation of our
telecommunications business as more fully described below. See
"Business -- Government Regulation." In general, regulation of the
telecommunications industry is in a state of flux. With the passage of the
Telecommunications Act, Congress sought to foster competition in the
telecommunications industry. The Telecommunications Act attempted to create a
framework for companies, such as ours, to offer local exchange service for
business and residential customers in competition with existing local telephone
companies. The Telecommunications Act also sought to open up the long distance
market to additional competition by permitting RBOCs to engage in the long
distance business, under certain conditions, in the same regions where they now
offer local service. These and many other regulations are the subject of ongoing
administrative proceedings at the state and federal levels, litigation in
federal and state courts, and legislation in federal and state legislatures. The
outcome of the various proceedings, litigation and legislation cannot be
predicted and might adversely affect our business and operations.

The Telecommunications Act and the issuance by the Federal Communication
Commission ("FCC") of rules governing local competition, particularly those
requiring the interconnection of all networks and the exchange of traffic among
the ILECs and CLECs, as well as pro-competitive policies already developed by
state regulatory commissions, have caused fundamental changes in the structure
of the markets for local exchange services. On January 25, 1999, the Supreme
Court largely reversed earlier decisions of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
and held that the FCC has general jurisdiction to implement the local
competition provisions of the Telecommunications Act. The Supreme Court stated
that the FCC has authority to set pricing guidelines for CLECs to use various
portions of the ILEC's network necessary for the CLECs to provide service. These
portions of the ILEC's network are called "Unbundled Network Elements" or
"UNEs." The Supreme Court also affirmed the FCC's authority to prevent ILECs
from refusing to sell to CLECs the ILECs existing combinations of network
elements. The Supreme Court approved the FCC's establishment of "pick and
choose" rules regarding interconnection agreements between ILECs and CLECs
(which would permit a CLEC to "pick and choose" among various terms of service
in different interconnection agreements between the ILEC and other CLECs). The
Supreme Court's decision reestablishes the validity of many of the FCC rules
vacated by the Eighth Circuit. Although the Supreme Court affirmed the FCC's
authority to develop pricing guidelines, the Court did not evaluate the specific
pricing methodology adopted by the FCC and has remanded the case to the Eighth
Circuit for further consideration. In its decision, the Supreme Court also
vacated the FCC's rule that identifies the unbundled network elements that ILECs
must provide to CLECs. The Supreme Court found that the FCC had not adequately
considered certain statutory criteria for requiring ILECs to make those network
elements available to CLECs. Thus, while the Supreme Court resolved many issues,
including the FCC's jurisdictional authority, other issues remain subject to
further consideration by the courts and the FCC, and we cannot predict the
ultimate disposition of these
21
<PAGE> 24

matters. The possible impact of this decision, including the portion dealing
with unbundled network elements, on existing interconnection agreements between
ILECs and CLECs or on agreements that may be negotiated in the future also can
not be determined at this time.

Although the passage of the Telecommunications Act should result in
increased opportunities for companies that are competing with the ILECs, no
assurance can be given that changes in current or future regulations adopted by
the FCC or state regulators or other legislative or judicial initiatives
relating to the telecommunications industry would not have a material adverse
effect on us.

We believe we are entitled to receive reciprocal compensation from ILECs
for the transport and termination of Internet traffic as local traffic pursuant
to various interconnection agreements. Some ILECs have not paid and/or have
disputed these charges, arguing the Internet service provider traffic is not
local traffic as defined by the various agreements. Both state and federal
regulators currently are considering the proper jurisdictional classification of
local calls placed to an Internet service provider, and whether Internet service
provider calling triggers an obligation to pay reciprocal compensation. Although
all of the 29 states addressing the question to date have ruled that Internet
traffic is local traffic, there can be no assurance that these issues will be
resolved by the FCC or all of the states, or that any such resolution will be
favorable to us. We account for reciprocal compensation with the ILECs,
including activity associated with Internet traffic, as local traffic pursuant
to the terms of our interconnection agreements. Accordingly, revenue is
recognized in the period that the traffic is terminated. The circumstances
surrounding the disputes, including the status of cases that have arisen by
reason of similar disputes, is considered by management periodically in
determining whether reserves against unpaid balances are warranted. As of
December 31, 1998, provisions for reserves have not been considered necessary by
management. However, we cannot assure you that management will not determine
that a reserve is necessary at some point in the future or that ultimately these
receivables will be collected. Approximately $46.0 million of our receivables,
as of December 31, 1998, are related to such reciprocal compensation. As our
Internet service provider traffic grows, these amounts are expected to increase
and will be accounted for in the manner described above.

The regulatory status of telephone service over the Internet is presently
uncertain. We are unable to predict what regulations may be adopted in the
future or to what extent existing laws and regulations may be found by state and
federal authorities to be applicable to such services or the impact such new or
existing laws and regulations may have on our business. Specific statutes and
regulations addressing this service have not been adopted at this time and the
extent to which current laws and regulations at the state and federal levels
will be interpreted to include such Internet telephone services has not been
determined. The FCC has indicated, for example, that voice telecommunications
carried over the Internet between two telephone sets using the public switched
network may be subject to payment of access charges and Universal Service
funding obligations, while voice telecommunications using computers rather than
telephone sets may not be subject to such obligations. There can be no assurance
that new laws or regulations relating to these services or a determination that
existing laws are applicable to them will not have a material adverse effect on
our business.

REGULATORY APPROVALS OF OFFERINGS

Certain states in which we are certified to provide local telephone
services require prior approval or notification before we issue our securities.
Because of time constraints, we have not always, and may not in the future
obtain such approvals prior to consummating offerings of our securities. After
consultation with our counsel, we believe that obtaining such approvals
subsequent to the offerings should not result in any material adverse
consequences. However, we cannot assure you that material adverse consequences
will not result.

RISK OF TERMINATION, CANCELLATION OR NON-RENEWAL OF INTEREXCHANGE AGREEMENTS,
NETWORK AGREEMENTS, LICENSES AND PERMITS

We lease and/or purchase agreements for rights-of-way, utility pole
attachments, conduits and dark fiber for our fiber optic networks. Although we
do not believe any of these agreements will be canceled in the near future,
cancellation or non-renewal of certain of such agreements could materially
adversely affect our business in the affected metropolitan area. In addition, we
have certain licenses and permits from local

22
<PAGE> 25

government authorities. The Telecommunications Act requires local government
authorities to treat telecommunications carriers and most utilities, including
most ILECs and electric companies, in a competitively neutral,
non-discriminatory manner to afford alternative carriers access to their poles,
conduits and rights-of-way at reasonable rates on non-discriminatory terms and
conditions. We cannot assure you we will be able to maintain our existing
franchises, permits and rights or to obtain and maintain the other franchises,
permits and rights needed to implement our strategy on acceptable terms. In
March 1998, we acquired a 20 year indefeasible right of use from Williams that
provides us with high capacity transport for our integrated voice and data
services, connecting major markets throughout the continental United States. The
indefeasible right of use may be terminated by Williams if we fail to make the
required payments and, in the event of a bankruptcy of Williams, the
indefeasible right of use may be rejected by Williams in a bankruptcy
proceeding.

DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL

Our continued success depends on the continued employment of certain
members of our senior management team and on our continued ability to attract
and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. We do not have long-term
employment agreements with any of our key employees. The loss of the services of
key personnel or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel could
have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

We have from time to time held, and continue to hold, preliminary
discussions with (i) potential strategic investors who have expressed an
interest in making an investment in or acquiring us and (ii) potential joint
venture partners looking toward the formation of strategic alliances that would
expand the reach of our networks or services without necessarily requiring an
additional investment in us. In addition to providing additional growth capital,
we believe that an alliance with an appropriate strategic investor would provide
operating synergy to, and enhance the competitive positions of, both us and the
investor within the rapidly consolidating telecommunications industry. We cannot
assure you that agreements for any of the foregoing will be reached.

FINANCING CHANGE OF CONTROL OFFER

Upon the occurrence of certain specific kinds of change of control events,
we will be required to offer to repurchase all of our outstanding debt and one
series of preferred stock and to offer to redeem our other outstanding series of
preferred stock. However, it is possible that we will not have sufficient funds
at the time of the change of control to make the required repurchase. In
addition, certain important corporate events, such as leveraged
recapitalizations that would increase the level of our indebtedness, would not
constitute a change of control.

CLASS ACTION BY DIGEX STOCKHOLDERS

On June 5, 1997, we announced our intention to acquire (the "DIGEX
Acquisition") 100% of the outstanding equity of DIGEX. The DIGEX Acquisition was
consummated through a tender offer for all of the outstanding shares of DIGEX,
which closed on July 9, 1997, followed by a cash merger effective on July 11,
1997 (the "DIGEX Merger").

On June 20, 1997, two purported class action complaints were filed in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County
respectively by TAAM Associates, Inc. and David and Chaise Steinberg (the
"Complaints"), purported stockholders of DIGEX, on behalf of all non-affiliated
common stockholders of DIGEX, against us, DIGEX and the directors of DIGEX (the
"DIGEX Directors"). The Complaints allege that the DIGEX Directors violated
their fiduciary duties to the public stockholders of DIGEX by agreeing to vote
in favor of the DIGEX Merger and that we knowingly aided and abetted such
violation by offering to retain DIGEX management in their present positions and
consenting to stock option grants to certain executive officers of DIGEX. The
Complaints sought preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining the DIGEX
Merger but no applications were made for such injunctions prior to consummation
of

23
<PAGE> 26

the DIGEX Merger on July 11, 1997. In addition, the Complaints seek cash damages
from the DIGEX Directors. In August 1997, a motion to dismiss the Complaints was
filed on behalf of us, DIGEX and the DIGEX Directors. A motion to dismiss for
failure to prosecute was filed in February 1999.

These cases are in their very early stages, and no assurance can be given
as to their ultimate outcome. After consultation with our counsel, we believe
that there are meritorious factual and legal defenses to the claims in the
Complaints. We intend to defend vigorously the claims in the Complaints.

YEAR 2000 DATE CONVERSION

To ensure that our computer systems and applications will function properly
beyond 1999, we have implemented a Year 2000 program.

As the first phase of its program, we conducted an inventory and assessment
of our network equipment, office equipment and information management systems.
While we believe that our equipment inventory is complete, much of the equipment
we use resides outside our headquarters, and we cannot assure you that we have
not overlooked mission critical equipment.

Based on our inventory and assessment, we determined that we will be
required to modify or replace portions of our software and hardware so that our
networks, office equipment and information management systems will function
properly with respect to dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. We made such
determinations based in part on statements made by hardware and software vendors
as to the year 2000 compliance of the systems we use. We also conducted a risk
assessment to identify those systems whose failure would be expected to result
in the greatest risk. Although we intend to conduct tests to ensure that our
equipment is Year 2000 compliant, we will focus such tests on those systems
whose failure would pose the greatest risk. We will not likely test all of our
equipment and will rely upon vendor representations, if received, where tests
are not conducted. We cannot assure you of the accuracy or completeness of such
vendor representations.

We have begun upgrading, replacing and testing certain components of our
networks and information processing systems and scheduling the installation of
other necessary hardware and software upgrades. We believe that we have
allocated adequate resources for this purpose, and we expect our Year 2000 date
conversion program to be successfully completed on a timely basis. However, we
cannot assure you that we will successfully implement all of the necessary
upgrades in a timely manner. We presently believe that with modifications to
existing software and conversions to new software and hardware, the Year 2000
issue will not pose significant operational problems for our systems. However,
if we do not make the modifications and conversions, or we do not complete such
modifications or conversions in timely fashion, the Year 2000 problems could
have a material impact on our operations.

We are in the process of contacting all of our significant suppliers and
large customers to determine the extent to which our interface systems are
vulnerable to those third parties' failure to remediate their own Year 2000
issues. We also are currently planning interoperability tests to ensure that our
suppliers' and business partners' systems will accurately interact with our
systems into and beyond the new millennium. We, however, have not undertaken an
in-depth evaluation of our suppliers' or customers' Year 2000 preparedness and
the ability of such third parties to adequately address their Year 2000 issues
is outside our control. There can be no guarantee that the systems of other
companies on which our systems rely will be timely converted, or that any such
converted systems will interact properly with the Company's systems, or that
such conversions, if not completed or improperly implemented, would not have a
material adverse effect on our systems.

The interoperation of our systems with those of our suppliers may be
impacted by the Year 2000 date change. In addition, in light of the vast
interconnection and interoperability of telecommunications networks worldwide,
the ability of any telecommunications provider, including us, to provide
services to our customers (e.g., to complete calls and transport data and to
bill for such services) is dependent, to some extent, on the networks and
systems of other carriers. To the extent the networks and systems of those
carriers are adversely impacted by Year 2000 problems, our ability to service
our customers may be adversely impacted as well.

24
<PAGE> 27

The estimates of the costs of the project and the completion date are based
on management's best estimates, which were derived utilizing numerous
assumptions regarding future events, including the continued availability of
certain resources, third party modification plans and other factors. However,
there can be no guarantee that these estimates will be achieved and actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated. Specific factors that
might cause such material differences include, but are not limited to, the
availability and cost of personnel trained in this area, the ability to locate
and correct all relevant computer codes, unanticipated mergers and acquisitions,
and similar uncertainties. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Impact of Year 2000" for a
discussion of the costs to date and projected costs to complete our Year 2000
project.

In addition to the risks described above, reasonably likely worst case Year
2000 scenarios include: widespread failure of electrical, gas and similar
supplies serving us; widespread disruption of the services provided by common
communications carriers; similar disruptions to the means and modes of
transportation for us and our employees, contractors, suppliers and customers;
significant disruption of our ability to gain access to, and remain working in,
office buildings and other facilities; the failure of substantial numbers of our
critical computer hardware and software systems; and the failure of outside
entities' systems, including systems related to banking and finance.

If we cannot operate effectively after December 31, 1999, we could, among
other things, face substantial claims by our customers or loss of revenue due to
service interruptions, the inability to fulfill contractual obligations or to
bill customers accurately and on a timely basis, increased expenses associated
with litigation, stabilization of operations following critical system failures
and the execution of contingency plans and the inability by customers and others
to pay, on a timely basis or at all, obligations owed to us. Under these
circumstances, the adverse effects, although not quantifiable at this time,
would be material to our business, results of operations, financial condition
and prospects.

ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, the provisions of the Delaware
General Corporation Law and the terms of our outstanding debt and preferred
stock may make it difficult to effect a change of control and replace our
incumbent management. In addition, stockholders, pursuant to a Stockholder's
Rights Plan, have the right to acquire a series of preferred stock, exercisable
upon the occurrence of certain events. The existence of these provisions may
have a negative impact on the price of our Common Stock, may discourage third
party's from making a bid for us or may reduce any premiums paid to stockholders
for their Common Stock. In addition, the Board of Directors has the authority to
fix the rights and preferences of, and to issue shares of, our preferred stock,
which may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control without
action by our stockholders.

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Future sales of shares of Common Stock by existing stockholders or the
issuance of shares of Common Stock upon exercise of options or warrants or
conversion of convertible securities, could materially adversely affect the
market price of the Common Stock and could impair our future ability to raise
capital through an offering of equity securities. Substantially all of our
outstanding Common Stock are covered by effective registration statements or are
transferable without restrictions under the Securities Act. We cannot make any
predictions as to the effect market sales of such Common Stock or the
availability of such Common Stock for future sale will have on the market price
of the Common Stock prevailing from time to time.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements in this Annual Report that are not historical facts
are "forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as "estimates," "projects," "anticipates,"
"expects," "intends," "believes" or the negative thereof or other variations
thereon or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties.
Examples of forward-looking statements include discussions of

25
<PAGE> 28

our plans to expand our existing networks, introduce new products, build and
acquire networks in new areas, install switches or provide local services, the
estimate of market sizes and addressable markets for our services and products,
the market opportunity presented by larger metropolitan areas, anticipated
revenues from designated markets during 1999 and statements regarding the
development of our businesses, anticipated capital expenditures and regulatory
reform.

Management wishes to caution you that all forward-looking statements
contained in this Annual Report are only estimates and predictions. Actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in this Annual Report as
a result of risks facing us or actual events differing from the assumptions
underlying such statements. Such risks and assumptions include, but are not
limited to, those discussed above.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Intermedia leases its principal administrative, marketing, warehouse and
service development facilities in Tampa, Florida and leases other space for
storage of its electronics equipment and for administrative, sales and
engineering functions in other cities where the Company operates networks and/or
performs sales functions. Intermedia believes that its properties are adequate
and suitable for their intended purposes.

As of December 31, 1998, the Company's total telecommunications and
equipment in service consisted of fiber optic telecommunications equipment
(48%), fiber optic cable (33%), furniture and fixtures (9%), leasehold
improvements (2%) and construction in progress (8%). Such properties do not lend
themselves to description by character and location of principal units. Fiber
optic cable plant used in providing service is primarily on or under public
roads, highways or streets, with the remainder being on or under private
property. Substantially all of the Company's telecommunications equipment is
housed in multiple leased facilities in various locations throughout the
metropolitan areas served by Intermedia.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Except as described below, the Company is not a party to any pending legal
proceedings other than various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course
of business. The Company does not believe that these normal course of business
claims or lawsuits will have a material effect on the Company's business,
financial condition or results of operations.

On June 20, 1997, two purported class action complaints were filed in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County
respectively by TAAM Associates, Inc. and David and Chaile Steinberg, purported
stockholders of DIGEX on behalf of all non-affiliated common stockholders of
DIGEX against Intermedia, DIGEX and the DIGEX Directors. The Complaints allege
that the DIGEX Directors violated their fiduciary duties to the public
stockholders of DIGEX by agreeing to vote in favor of the DIGEX Merger, and that
Intermedia knowingly aided and abetted such violation by offering to retain
DIGEX management in their present positions and consenting to stock option
grants to certain executive officers of DIGEX. The Complaints sought preliminary
and permanent injunctions enjoining the DIGEX Merger but no applications were
made for such injunctions prior to consummation of the DIGEX Merger on July 11,
1997. In addition, the Complaints seek cash damages from the DIGEX Directors. In
August 1997, a motion to dismiss the Complaints was filed on behalf of
Intermedia, DIGEX and the DIGEX Directors. A motion to dismiss for failure to
prosecute was filed in February 1999.

These cases are in their very early stages and no assurance can be given as
to their ultimate outcome. Intermedia, after consultation with its counsel,
believes that there are meritorious factual and legal defenses to the claims in
the Complaints. Intermedia intends to defend vigorously the claims in the
Complaints.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

26
<PAGE> 29

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's Common Stock trades on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the
symbol "ICIX". As of December 31, 1998, based upon 160 holders of record of the
Common Stock and an estimate of the number of individual participants
represented by security position listings, there are approximately 8,000
beneficial holders of the Common Stock. The approximate high and low bid prices
for the Common Stock tabulated below are as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market
and represent inter-dealer quotations which do not include retail mark-ups,
mark-downs or commissions. Such prices do not necessarily represent actual
transactions. The Company completed a two-for-one stock split (effected as a
stock dividend) on June 15, 1998. Where applicable, the prices have been
adjusted to give effect to the split.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BID PRICE
-------------
QUARTER HIGH LOW
- ------- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C>
1997
First..................................................... 12 13/16 6 3/8
Second.................................................... 16 7/16 7 3/4
Third..................................................... 23 7/8 15 3/16
Fourth.................................................... 30 13/16 20 5/8
1998
First..................................................... 45 17/32 26 7/8
Second.................................................... 40 9/16 30 13/16
Third..................................................... 43 20 3/8
Fourth.................................................... 26 3/8 12 3/4
</TABLE>

Holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to dividends, when and if
declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefor.
Intermedia has never declared or paid cash dividends on its Common Stock.
Intermedia intends to retain its earnings, if any, to finance the development
and expansion of its business, and therefore does not anticipate paying any
dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms
of the Company's outstanding indebtedness and preferred stock restrict the
payment of dividends until certain conditions are met. When such restrictions no
longer exist, the decision whether to pay dividends will be made by the Board of
Directors in light of conditions then existing, including the Company's results
of operations, financial condition and capital requirements, business conditions
and other factors. The payment of dividends on the Common Stock is also subject
to the preference applicable to the outstanding shares of the Company's
preferred stock and to the preference that may be applicable to any shares of
the Company's preferred stock issued in the future.

27
<PAGE> 30

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER OPERATING DATA

The selected financial data and balance sheet data presented below as of
and for the five years in the period ended December 31, 1998 have been derived
from the consolidated financial statements of the Company, which financial
statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent certified public
accountants.

The following financial information should be read in conjunction with
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations," "Business" and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
and the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this report.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
-------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -------------
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND STATISTICAL DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Selected Financial Data:
Revenue.......................... $ 14,272 $ 38,631 $ 103,397 $ 247,899 $ 712,783
Expenses
Network expenses, facilities
administration and
maintenance, and cost of
goods sold.................. 5,396 22,989 81,105 199,139 468,780
Selling, general and
administrative.............. 6,412 14,993 36,610 98,598 215,109
Depreciation and
amortization................ 5,132 10,196 19,836 53,613 229,747
Charge for in-process
R&D(1)...................... -- -- -- 60,000 63,000
Restructuring and other
charges(2).................. -- -- -- -- 53,453
-------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -------------
16,940 48,178 137,551 411,350 1,030,089
-------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Loss from operations............. (2,668) (9,547) (34,154) (163,451) (317,306)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense.............. (1,218) (13,767) (35,213) (60,662) (205,760)
Interest and other income..... 819 4,060 12,168 26,824 35,837
Income tax benefit............ -- 97 -- -- --
-------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Loss before extraordinary
item........................ (3,067) (19,157) (57,199) (197,289) (487,229)
Extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt(3)... -- (1,592) -- (43,834) --
-------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Net loss......................... (3,067) (20,749) (57,199) (241,123) (487,229)
Preferred stock dividends and
accretions.................... -- -- -- (43,742) (90,344)
-------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Net loss attributable to
common stockholders......... $ (3,067) $ (20,749) $ (57,199) $ (284,865) $ (577,573)
======== ========== ========== =========== =============
Basic and diluted loss per common
share:
Loss before extraordinary item,
including preferred stock
dividends and accretions...... $ (0.17) $ (0.95) $ (2.04) $ (7.23) $ (13.23)
Extraordinary item(3)............ -- (.08) -- (1.31) --
-------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Net loss per common share........ $ (0.17) $ (1.03) $ (2.04) $ (8.54) $ (13.23)
======== ========== ========== =========== =============
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding................... 17,912 20,072 28,035 33,340 43,645
======== ========== ========== =========== =============
Other Data:
EBITDA before certain
changes(4).................... $ 2,464 $ 649 $ (14,318) $ (49,838) $ 28,894
</TABLE>

28
<PAGE> 31

- ---------------

(1) A one time charge to earnings was recorded as a result of the purchase of in
process research and development ("R&D") in connection with the acquisition
of DIGEX of $60,000 and with the acquisition of Shared of $63,000.
(2) Restructuring charges include costs associated with management's plan to
transform its separate operating companies into one integrated
communications provider.
(3) The Company incurred extraordinary charges in 1995 and 1997 related to early
extinguishment of debt.
(4) EBITDA before certain charges consists of earnings (loss) before
extraordinary loss on early extinquishment of debt, interest expense,
interest and other income, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, charges
for in-process R&D and business restructuring, integration and other costs
associated with the restructuring program. EBITDA before certain charges
does not represent funds available for management's discretionary use and is
not intended to represent cash flow from operations. EBITDA before certain
charges should not be considered as an alternative to net loss as an
indicator of the Company's operating performance or to cash flows as a
measure of liquidity. In addition, EBITDA before certain charges is not a
term defined by generally acceptable accounting principles and as a result
the measure of EBITDA before certain charges presented herein may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. The Company
believes that EBITDA before certain charges is often reported and widely
used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in the
telecommunications industry. Accordingly, this information has been
disclosed herein to permit a more complete comparative analysis of the
Company's operating performance relative to other companies in the industry.
(5) Amounts reflected in the table are based upon information contained in the
Company's operating records.

29
<PAGE> 32

(6) Beginning in January 1997, Intermedia changed its definition of "Buildings
connected" to include buildings connected to Intermedia's network via
facilities leased by Intermedia in addition to those connected to
Intermedia's network via facilities constructed by or otherwise owned by
Intermedia. Intermedia believes the new definition is consistent with
industry practice.
(7) Amount represents an individual point of origination and termination of
data served by the Company's enhanced network.
(8) Represents long distance billable minutes for the most recent fiscal
quarter in the period indicated (in thousands).
(9) Cash and cash equivalents excludes investments of $26,675, $6,853, and
$7,930 in 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, restricted under the terms of
various notes and other agreements.
(10) Working capital includes the restricted investments referred to in Note 8
above whose restrictions either lapse within one year or will be used to
pay current liabilities.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Intermedia has experienced continuous revenue growth since its inception in
1986. Building from its original base in Florida, Intermedia now provides
integrated communications services nationally with a focus on customers who have
a substantial presence in the eastern United States. Through a combination of
internally generated growth and targeted acquisitions, the Company has expanded
its service territory and dramatically increased its customer base.

Intermedia's customers include a broad range of business and government end
users and, to a lesser extent, Internet service providers and other carriers.
The Company delivers local network services, including local exchange service,
primarily through Company owned local and long distance switches and over a
Company owned or leased digital transport network. Often, leasing facilities
enables the Company to more rapidly initiate service to customers, reduces the
risk of network construction or acquisition, and potentially improves cash flow
due to the reduction or deferment of capital expenditures. The Company offers
enhanced data services to its customers on an extensive inter-city network that
connects its customers, either through its own network or through other
carriers, to locations throughout the country and internationally. Through its
680 network to network interfaces ("NNIs") and 177 data switches, Intermedia has
established one of the most densely deployed frame relay switching networks in
the nation. The Company's nationwide interexchange network carries both its
voice and data network traffic.

At its inception, Intermedia provided special access and private line
services to interexchange carriers. In 1988, Intermedia was the first
telecommunications provider in Florida to begin providing special access and
private line services to business customers. In 1991, Intermedia began offering
specialized integration services such as construction of campus local area
networks ("LANs"), and in 1992, Intermedia introduced its first enhanced data
services based on frame relay technology, providing flexible capacity and highly
reliable end-to-end data service. The Company began offering interexchange long
distance service in December 1994, Internet services in 1995, local exchange
services in 1996 and integrated voice/data services via Single-T(SM) in 1997.
The pace with which the Company has introduced new service offerings has enabled
it to achieve substantial growth, expand its base of customers and diversify its
sources of revenue. The Company believes that business and government customers
will continue to account for a substantial share of its revenue because of
Intermedia's ability to offer such customers integrated, cost-effective
telecommunications solutions.

Network operating costs, administration and maintenance of facilities,
depreciation of network capital expenditures and sales, general and
administrative costs will continue to represent a large portion of the Company's
expenses for the next several years. In addition, the Company is experiencing
rapid growth in marketing and selling expenses consistent with the addition of
new customers and an increased level of selling and marketing activity. The
Company anticipates that as its customer base grows, incremental revenues will
be greater than incremental operating expenses.

All of the marketing and selling expenses associated with the acquisition
of new customers are expensed as they are incurred even though these customers
are expected to generate recurring revenue for the Company for several years.
The continued expansion of the Company's networks in preparation for new
customers and

30
<PAGE> 33

the marketing of services to new and existing customers is therefore adversely
impacting EBITDA before certain charges of the Company in the near term. From
1992 through 1995, the Company achieved positive EBITDA before certain charges
and increased its revenue base substantially. As a result of significant
investments in the resources necessary to launch local exchange services and
expand enhanced data services, the Company's EBITDA before certain charges was
negative for 1996 and 1997. The Company's EBITDA before certain charges was
positive for the full year of 1998. EBITDA before certain charges consists of
earnings (loss) before extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt,
interest expense, interest and other income, income taxes, depreciation,
amortization, charges for in-process research and development ("R&D"), and
business integration, restructuring and other costs associated with the
restructuring program. EBITDA before certain charges does not represent funds
available for management's discretionary use and is not intended to represent
cash flow from operations. EBITDA before certain charges should not be
considered as an alternative to net loss as an indicator of the Company's
operating performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. In addition,
EBITDA before certain charges is not a term defined by generally accepted
accounting principals and as a result the EBITDA before certain charges
presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by
other companies. The Company believes that EBITDA before certain charges is
often reported and widely used by analysts, investors and other interested
parties in the telecommunications industry. Accordingly, this information has
been disclosed herein to permit a more complete comparative analysis of the
Company's operating performance relative to other companies in the industry.

During 1998, Intermedia entered into enhanced data services agreements with
US West, Ameritech, Bell Atlantic Corp. and Williams. Pursuant to the agreements
with US West and Ameritech, Intermedia will provide frame relay networking and
Internet services for interLATA connections, both inside and outside US West's
and Ameritech's service regions. Intermedia will begin to provide services under
the agreement with Bell Atlantic when and if Bell Atlantic obtains the approvals
necessary under the Telecommunications Act to offer long distance services in
its primary east coast markets. Williams will use Intermedia's enhanced data
services in areas where it does not have data switching capability.

In March 1998, the Company and Williams executed a Capacity Purchase
Agreement which provides the Company with the right to purchase transmission
capacity on a non-cancelable indefeasible right of use basis on the Williams
fiber network for the next 20 years. The agreement covers approximately 14,000
route miles.

On March 10, 1998, the Company completed its acquisition of Shared, a
shared tenant communications services provider. Aggregate cash consideration for
the acquisition was approximately $782.2 million and was funded with the
Company's existing cash reserves in March 1998. For convenience, the operating
results of Shared are included in the Company's consolidated financial
statements commencing on January 1, 1998.

On March 31, 1998, the Company acquired LDS, a regional interexchange
carrier. Aggregate consideration for the acquisition was approximately $15.7
million in cash, plus 5,359,748 shares of the Company's Common Stock, valued at
approximately $137.2 million, the retirement of $15.1 million in LDS's long-term
debt, and acquisition related expenses of $2.4 million. The cash portion of the
acquisition was funded with the Company's existing cash reserves in March 1998.
The operating results of LDS for the one day of ownership during the first
quarter of 1998 are considered immaterial. The operating results of LDS are
included in the Company's consolidated financial statements commencing on April
1, 1998.

On April 30, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of privately held
National, an emerging switch-based competitive local exchange carrier and
established interexchange carrier. Aggregate consideration for the acquisition
was approximately $59.5 million in cash, plus 2,909,796 shares of the Company's
Common Stock, valued at approximately $88.7 million, the retirement of $2.8
million in National's long-term debt, and $2.2 million in acquisition related
costs. The cash portion of the acquisition was funded with the Company's
existing cash reserves in April 1998. The operating results of National are
included in the Company's consolidated financial statements commencing on April
1, 1998.

On April 29, 1998, the Company announced that it had committed resources to
the Program, a plan to implement the integration of acquired businesses to
maximize the synergies that will be realized and to reduce
31
<PAGE> 34

future costs. During the second quarter of 1998, the Company developed and began
implementation of the Program which was designed to streamline and refocus the
Company's operations and transform Intermedia's five separate operating
companies into one integrated communications provider. The significant
activities included in the Program include (i) consolidation, rationalization
and integration of network facilities, collocations, network management and
network facility procurement; (ii) consolidation and integration of the sales
forces of the Company and its recent acquisitions, including the integration of
the Company's products and services and the elimination of redundant headcount
and related costs; (iii) centralization of accounting and financial functions,
including the elimination of redundant headcount and related costs; (iv)
development and integration of information systems including the integration of
multiple billing systems and the introduction and deployment of automated sales
force and workflow management tools; (v) consolidation of office space and the
elimination of unnecessary legal entities; and (vi) exiting non-strategic
businesses including the elimination of headcount and related costs.

In connection with the adoption of the Program, the Company recorded a
restructuring charge during the second quarter of approximately $32.3 million,
which was reduced in the third and fourth quarters by $13.5 million, upon
renegotiation of a contract and other changes in estimates. The Company also
expensed other business restructuring and integration costs associated with the
Program of $34.7 million during 1998. Management anticipates that all activities
included in the Program will be completed by the end of 1999, and the Company
anticipates incurring additional business integration and restructuring costs
through the end of that period, which will be excluded from the calculation of
EBITDA before certain charges.

During 1999, Intermedia expects its wholly-owned, Web hosting subsidiary,
DIGEX, to offer to sell a portion of its capital stock to the public. While
Intermedia expects to own at least 51% of the capital stock of DIGEX after the
public offering, Intermedia may take other actions in the future which further
decrease its ownership interest. DIGEX anticipates using the proceeds of the
public offering to finance a portion of the expenses and capital requirements
associated with the continued expansion of the Web hosting business, including
the construction of additional data centers. Intermedia anticipates funding
DIGEX's future capital requirements independently of Intermedia. The Company may
elect not to proceed with a DIGEX offering based on valuation issues or
marketing considerations. There can be no assurance that DIGEX will successfully
complete the planned public offering or, if completed, the timing of the
offering or the proceeds DIGEX will receive.

The Company has from time to time held, and continues to hold, preliminary
discussions with (i) potential strategic investors (i.e. investors in the same
or a related business) who have expressed an interest in making an investment in
or acquiring the Company, (ii) potential joint venture partners looking toward
formation of strategic alliances that would expand the reach of the Company's
network or services without necessarily requiring an additional investment in or
by the Company, (iii) companies that represent potential acquisition
opportunities for the Company, and (iv) companies that desire to acquire
portions of the Company's assets. There can be no assurance that any agreement
with any potential strategic investor, joint venture partner, acquisition
target, or asset acquiror, will be reached nor does management believe that any
thereof is necessary to successfully implement its strategic plans.

PLAN OF OPERATION

In 1999, the Company believes its revenue growth will be balanced between
its enhanced data and local exchange services. Based on the Company's analysis
of FCC data and its knowledge of the industry, the Company estimates that the
market for enhanced data, local exchange, and interexchange services was
approximately $100 billion in 1998 in the Company's service territory.

In order to more rapidly develop its business and efficiently utilize its
capital resources, the Company plans to use the existing fiber optic
infrastructure of other providers in addition to using its own existing
networks. The Company believes transport provided on fiber optic systems has
become commodity-like, and its capital expenditures are better focused on
intelligent switching and other more strategic network components required to
implement a Packet/Cell Switching network. While the Company will use
significant

32
<PAGE> 35

amounts of capital to deploy enhanced data and voice switches on a demand driven
basis in selected markets, Intermedia believes its substantial existing network
capacity should enable it to add new customers and provide additional services
that will result in increased revenues with lower incremental costs and,
correspondingly, improve its EBITDA before certain charges. For example, selling
additional services, such as local exchange services, to existing or new
customers allows the Company to utilize unused portions of the capacity inherent
in its existing fiber optic networks. This operating leverage increases the
utilization of the network with limited additional capital expenditures. The
Company's strategy to offer a full complement of telecommunications services is
designed to enable the Company to take advantage of the operating leverage of
its networks.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, certain
information derived from the Consolidated Statements of Operations of the
Company expressed in percentages of revenue:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1996 1997 1998
----- ------ -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Local network services................................... 13.1% 16.9% 22.9%
Enhanced data services................................... 30.6 34.9 25.5
Interexchange services................................... 51.4 45.6 37.4
Integration services..................................... 4.9 2.6 14.2
----- ------ -----
100.0 100.0 100.0
Expenses:
Network expenses......................................... 66.8 66.3 47.4
Facilities administration and maintenance................ 7.4 12.8 9.3
Cost of goods sold....................................... 4.2 1.2 9.1
Selling, general and administrative...................... 35.4 39.8 30.2
Depreciation and amortization............................ 19.2 21.6 32.2
Charge for in-process R&D................................ -- 24.2 8.8
Business restructuring and integration................... -- -- 7.5
----- ------ -----
Loss from operations....................................... (33.0) (65.9) (44.5)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense......................................... (34.1) (24.5) (28.9)
Interest and other income................................ 11.8 10.8 5.0
Loss before extraordinary item............................. (55.3) (79.6) (68.4)
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt......... -- (17.7) --
----- ------ -----
Net Loss................................................... (55.3) (97.3) (68.4)
Preferred stock dividends and accretions................... -- (17.6) (12.7)
----- ------ -----
Loss attributable to common stockholders................... (55.3)% (114.9)% (81.0)%
===== ====== =====
</TABLE>

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997

The Company's revenue grew from $247.9 million to $712.8 million or 187.5%
from 1997 to 1998. Revenue in 1997 and 1998 for each of the Company's product
lines were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1998 INCREASE
------ ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Local network services...................................... $ 42.0 $163.4 $121.4
Enhanced data services...................................... 86.6 181.6 95.0
Interexchange services...................................... 113.2 266.4 153.2
Integration equipment, sales and services................... 6.1 101.4 95.3
------ ------ ------
$247.9 $712.8 $464.9
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>

33
<PAGE> 36

The overall increase in revenue was principally the result of the
acquisitions of Shared and LDS in the first quarter of 1998, the acquisition of
National in the second quarter of 1998, the introduction of new services and the
increased focus of the Company's sales force on offering a full suite of
communications services to an expanding market. A portion of the revenue
increase was also attributable to the inclusion of DIGEX for 12 months in 1998
compared to six months in 1997. In addition, the Company has been integrating
its acquisitions throughout 1998, and the Company offers a fully integrated
portfolio to a larger customer base.

Local network services revenue increased 289.4% to $163.4 million in 1998
compared to $42.0 million in 1997. This increase was principally due to the
acquisition of Shared during the first quarter of 1998, the acquisition of
National during the second quarter of 1998, and the continued rollout of local
exchange services into additional markets. The number of access line equivalents
increased from 81,349 at December 31, 1997 to 347,584 at December 31, 1998. The
Company was certified as a competitive local exchange carrier ("CLEC") in 37
states and the District of Columbia as of December 31, 1998.

Enhanced data services revenue increased 109.7% to $181.6 million in 1998
compared to $86.6 million in 1997. This increase was principally due to the
acquisition of LDS during the first quarter of 1998 and the expansion of the
Company's enhanced data network, as well as the inclusion of the operating
results of DIGEX for 12 months in 1998 compared to six months in 1997. The data
network was expanded by 41 switches, 294 NNI connections, and 15,059 new frame
relay nodes. In addition, the Company experienced a significant increase in
sales of frame relay, internet and web site services during 1998.

Interexchange services revenue increased 135.4% to $266.4 million in 1998
compared to $113.2 million in 1997. This increase resulted principally from the
acquisitions of Shared and LDS during the first quarter of 1998 and the
acquisition of National during the second quarter of 1998. These increases were
partially offset by the Company's second quarter decision to exit the wholesale
long distance business. However, the Company also experienced strong growth in
long distance switched revenue and steady growth in interLATA transport. Long
distance billable minutes increased to 1.7 billion for 1998 compared to 439.6
million for 1997.

Integration services revenue increased 1,549.6% to $101.4 million in 1998
compared to $6.1 million for the same period in 1997. This increase was
principally due to the acquisition of Shared during the first quarter of 1998.

Operating expenses in total increased 150.4% to $1,030.1 million in 1998
compared to $411.4 million in 1997. This increase was principally due to the
acquisition of Shared and LDS during the first quarter of 1998, the acquisition
of National during the second quarter of 1998 and the inclusion of DIGEX's
operating results for the full 12 months in 1998 versus the six months included
in 1997. The increase also resulted from the costs associated with the
significant expansion of the Company's owned and leased network and the
continued increase in personnel to sustain and support the Company's growth. Of
the increase, $53.5 million was related to expenses recorded in connection with
the Program and $63.0 million was related to a one time in-process R&D charge
(discussed below).

Network expenses increased 105.3% to $337.6 million in 1998 compared to
$164.5 million in 1997. The increase resulted principally from the acquisitions
of Shared and LDS in the first quarter of 1998 and the acquisition of National
in the second quarter of 1998. The Company incurred increased expenses in leased
network capacity associated with the growth of local network service, enhanced
data service and interexchange service revenues. The Williams agreement
positively impacted network operations expenses in 1998 by eliminating certain
backbone network costs that were previously accounted for as operating leases.
This positive impact was substantially offset by depreciation expense associated
with the underlying irrevocable right of use.

Facilities administration and maintenance increased 108.6% to $66.1 million
in 1998 compared to $31.7 million in 1997. The increase in the combined costs of
facilities administration and maintenance and cost of goods sold was principally
the result of the acquisitions of Shared and LDS in the first quarter of 1998
and the acquisition of National in the second quarter of 1998. The increase also
resulted from support costs relating to the expansion of the Company's owned and
leased network capacity, increases in maintenance expense due to network
expansion, and increased payroll expenses related to hiring additional
engineering and operations staff

34
<PAGE> 37

to support and service the expanding network, including the increase in
anticipated volume relating to the US West, Ameritech, and Bell Atlantic
agreements.

Cost of goods sold increased 2,070% to $65.1 million in 1998 compared to
$3.0 million in 1997. The increase in cost of goods sold was principally due to
the acquisition of Shared during the first quarter of 1998.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 118.2% to $215.1
million for the twelve months ended December 31, 1998 compared to $98.6 million
for the same period in 1997. The increase was principally due to the
acquisitions of Shared and LDS in the first quarter of 1998 and the acquisition
of National in the second quarter of 1998. The acquisitions of Shared, LDS, and
National contributed to the increase by approximately $38.4 million, $12.1
million, and $7.1 million, respectively. In addition, the Company has
experienced continued personnel growth, represented by departmental expense
increases in sales of approximately $42.2 million, marketing of approximately
$10.0 million, management information services of approximately $7.0 million and
customer operations and circuit design and provisioning of approximately $12.5
million. The growth in headcount was related to the expansion in all of the
Company's service lines.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 328.5% to $229.7 million in
1998 compared to $53.6 million in 1997. This increase primarily resulted from
additions to telecommunications equipment placed in service during 1997 and 1998
relating to ongoing network expansion (including the irrevocable right of use
acquired from Williams), as well as the acquisitions of Shared, LDS, and
National which contributed $662.8 million, 143.1 million, and 146.7 million,
respectively, of intangible assets in 1998. In addition, the acquisition of
DIGEX in July 1997 contributed approximately $113.4 million of intangible
assets. The amortization related to the DIGEX acquisition was included as part
of amortization expense for 12 months in 1998 compared to six months in 1997.

Charge for in-process R&D of $63.0 million for 1998 represents the amount
of purchased in-process R&D associated with the purchase of Shared. This
allocation represents the estimated fair value based on risk-adjusted cash flows
related to the incomplete projects. At the date of acquisition, the development
of these projects had not yet reached technological feasibility and in-process
R&D had no alternative future uses. Accordingly, these costs were expensed as of
the acquisition date and were recorded as a one-time charge to earnings in the
first quarter of 1998. In making its purchase price allocation, the Company
relied on present value calculations of income and cash flows, an analysis of
project accomplishments and completion costs, and an assessment of overall
contribution, as well as project risk. The amounts assigned to the in-process
R&D were determined by identifying significant research projects for which
technological feasibility had not been established. In-process R&D included the
development and deployment of an innovative multi-service access platform, which
will enable Shared to provision new data services.

Remaining development efforts for these in-process R&D projects include
various phases of design, development, and testing. Anticipated completion dates
for the in-process R&D projects will occur during 1999, after which time the
Company expects to begin generating economic benefits from the technologies.
Expenditures to complete these projects are expected to total approximately $1.4
million in 1999.

This estimate is subject to change, given the uncertainties of the
development process, and no assurance can be given that deviations from this
estimate will not occur. Management expects to continue development of these
efforts and believes the Company has a reasonable chance of successfully
completing the R&D programs. However, there is a risk associated with the
completion of the projects, and there is no assurance that any will meet with
either technological or commercial success. Failure to complete the in-process
R&D programs would result in the loss of the expected return inherent in the
fair value allocation.

The charge for in-process R&D in 1997 of $60 million represents the amount
of purchased in-process R&D associated with the purchase of DIGEX as described
below under the caption "Year Ended December 31, 1997 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 1996 -- Charge for In-Process R&D."

Business restructuring and integration expense of approximately $53.5
million was recorded by the Company during the twelve months ended December 31,
1998. As more fully discussed in Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements, these costs arose from businesses exited, contract terminations and

35
<PAGE> 38

integration and other restructuring activities and costs, including incremental,
redundant or convergence costs that result directly from implementation of the
Program. Additional incremental, redundant and convergence costs will be
expensed as they are incurred over the Program implementation period. Management
currently expects these additional costs to amount to approximately $13 million
over the remainder of the Program.

Interest expense increased 239.2% to $205.8 million in 1998 compared to
$60.7 million in 1997. This increase primarily resulted from interest expense on
approximately $1.2 billion of senior notes issued from the fourth quarter of
1997 and in 1998 and the non-cash imputed interest charges of $5.1 million and
$1.0 million related to the acquisitions of Shared and National, respectively.
In addition, the Company recorded interest expense of $40.3 million during the
year ended December 31, 1998, related to the capital lease with Williams.
Included in 1998 interest expense is $156.3 million of debt discount
amortization and $4.5 million of deferred loan cost amortization, both of which
are non-cash items. Interest expense capitalized in connection with the
Company's construction of telecommunications equipment amounted to approximately
$7.2 million and $5.0 million for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997,
respectively.

Interest and other income increased 33.6% to $35.8 million in 1998 compared
to $26.8 million in 1997. This increase was primarily the result of interest
earned on the cash available from the proceeds of the issuance of securities in
1997 and 1998.

Extraordinary Loss of $43.8 million in 1997 consisted of pre-payment
penalties relating to the early retirement of certain outstanding indebtedness
of the Company from the proceeds of a new issuance of senior notes and the
write-off of the unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the
retired indebtedness.

Preferred stock dividends and accretions increased 106.5% to $90.3 million
in 1998 compared to $43.7 million for 1997. The increase was attributable to the
dividend payments on the two series of preferred stock issued during October
1997 and August 1998 and the conversion of approximately $75 million liquidation
preference of outstanding preferred stock into Common Stock. The Company
recorded a preferred stock dividend charge of approximately $11.0 million during
the third quarter of 1998 representing the market value of the inducement
feature of the conversions. Preferred stock dividends were paid in the form of
Common Stock and preferred stock. Management does not expect to pay cash
dividends in the foreseeable future.

EBITDA before certain charges increased to $28.9 million in 1998 compared
to $(49.8) million for the same period in 1997. The increase was principally the
result of the acquisitions of Shared and LDS in the first quarter of 1998 and
the acquisition of National in the second quarter of 1998. The acquisitions also
contributed to improved EBITDA before certain charges by consolidating sales
forces and introducing the Company's products into additional markets. The
Company has continued its efforts to consolidate traffic through the Williams
backbone network, as well as through the Company's existing networks in an
efficient manner. In addition, the Company has been successful in selling more
of its access lines "on switch" and increasing its mix of higher margin
products. The business restructuring and integration program has yielded
benefits by rationalizing and integrating the recent acquisitions, including
eliminating redundant costs. In addition, the Company has reduced network
operation expenses, facilities administration and maintenance expenses and
selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue in 1998
compared to 1997.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996

The Company's revenue grew from $103.4 million to $247.9 million or 140%
from 1996 to 1997. Revenue in 1996 and 1997 for each of the Company's product
lines were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997 INCREASE
------ ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Local network services...................................... $ 13.5 $ 42.0 $ 28.5
Enhanced data services...................................... 31.7 86.6 54.9
Interexchange services...................................... 53.1 113.2 60.1
Systems integration......................................... 5.1 6.1 1.0
------ ------ ------
$103.4 $247.9 $144.5
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>

36
<PAGE> 39

The increase in revenue was derived principally from the acquisitions of
EMI Communications Corp. ("EMI"), Universal Telecom, Inc. ("UTT") and NetSolve,
Inc. ("NetSolve") in 1996, the acquisition of DIGEX in 1997, the introduction of
new services and the increased focus of the Company's sales force on offering a
full suite of communications services to an expanding market. The increase in
the level of local network services primarily related to the continued rollout
of local exchange services into additional markets. The number of access line
equivalents, increased from 7,106 at December 31, 1996 to 81,349 at December 31,
1997. The Company had received CLEC certification in 36 states and the District
of Columbia as of December 31, 1997. The increase in the level of enhanced data
services primarily resulted from the expansion of the Company's enhanced data
network by 47 switches and 10,432 new frame relay nodes since January 1, 1997.
In addition, the number of frame relay cities increased by 1,838 during the same
time period. A portion of the revenue increase was attributable to the inclusion
of EMI for 12 months in 1997 versus 6 months in 1996, the inclusion of NetSolve
for 12 months in 1997 versus 1 month in 1996 and the inclusion of DIGEX from
July 1, 1997. From December 31, 1996 to December 31, 1997, the number of fiber
miles in the Company's network increased from 24,122 to 34,956 and route miles
increased from 655 to 757. The increase in the level of interexchange services
primarily resulted from strong growth in long distance switched revenue and
steady growth in interLATA transport. The increase in the level of integration
services primarily resulted from the Company's increased focus on providing a
total service package for the customer.

Operating expenses in total increased 199% to $411.4 million in 1997
compared to $137.6 million in 1996. The increase primarily resulted from the
costs associated with the significant expansion of the Company's owned and
leased network and the continued increase in personnel to sustain and support
the Company's growth. Of the increase, $60 million resulted from the charge for
in-process research and development and the inclusion of EMI, NetSolve, UTT and
DIGEX's operating results. EMI's operating results were included for 12 months
in 1997 versus 6 months in 1996. NetSolve and UTT's operating results were
included for 12 months in 1997 versus 1 month in 1996. DIGEX's operating results
were included from July 1, 1997.

Network expenses increased 138% to $164.5 million in 1997 compared to $69.1
million in 1996. This increase primarily resulted from the increases in leased
network capacity associated with the growth of local network service, enhanced
data service and interexchange service revenues. A portion of the increase was
attributable to the inclusion of EMI for 12 months in 1997 versus 6 months in
1996, the inclusion of NetSolve and UTT for 12 months in 1997 versus 1 month in
1996 and the inclusion of DIGEX from July 1, 1997.

Facilities administration and maintenance and cost of goods sold increased
188% to $34.6 million in 1997 compared to $12.0 million in 1996. A portion of
the increase was attributable to the inclusion of EMI for 12 months in 1997
versus 6 months in 1996, the inclusion of NetSolve and UTT for 12 months in 1997
versus 1 month in 1996 and the inclusion of DIGEX from July 1, 1997. In
addition, the increase resulted from the expansion of the Company's owned and
leased network capacity, increases in maintenance expense due to the network
expansion and increased payroll expense related to hiring additional engineering
and operations staff to support and service the expanding network.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 169% to $98.6
million in 1997 compared to $36.6 million in 1996. This increase primarily
resulted from the Company's continued growth represented by departmental
increases in sales and marketing of approximately $20.6 million, management
information of approximately $1.4 million, and customer service of approximately
$3.1 million and one time expenditures for employee recruitment, relocation and
training and increased commissions relating to the rise in revenue for these
periods. A portion of the increase was attributable to the inclusion of EMI for
12 months in 1997 versus 6 months in 1996, the inclusion of NetSolve and UTT for
12 months in 1997 versus 1 month in 1996 and the inclusion of DIGEX from July 1,
1997.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 170% to $53.6 million in
1997 compared to $19.8 million in 1996. This increase primarily resulted from
additions to telecommunications equipment placed in service during 1996 and
1997, relating to ongoing network expansion, as well as the DIGEX acquisition
which contributed $113.4 million of goodwill in 1997. A portion of the increase
was attributable to the inclusion of EMI for 12 months in 1997 versus 6 months
in 1996, the inclusion of NetSolve and UTT for 12 months in 1997 versus 1 month
in 1996, and the inclusion of DIGEX from July 1, 1997.

37
<PAGE> 40

Charge for in-process R&D of $60 million represents the amount of purchased
in-process R&D associated with the purchase of DIGEX. In connection with this
acquisition, the Company allocated $60 million of the purchase price to
in-process R&D projects. This allocation represents the estimated fair value
based on risk-adjusted cash flows related to the incomplete products. At the
date of acquisition, the development of these projects had not yet reached
technological feasibility and the in-process R&D had no alternative future uses.
Accordingly, these costs were expensed as a one-time charge to earnings in the
third quarter of 1997.

In making its purchase price allocation, the Company relied on present
value calculations of income, an analysis of project accomplishments and
completion costs and an assessment of overall contribution and project risk. The
amounts assigned to the in-process R&D were determined by identifying
significant research projects for which technological feasibility had not been
established. These projects included development, engineering, and testing
activities associated with specific and substantial network projects including
new router technology related to traffic management and very high speed data
streams, as well as value-added services such as multicasting and new advanced
web management capabilities.

The value assigned to purchased in-process R&D was determined by estimating
the costs to develop the purchased in-process R&D into commercially viable
products and services, estimating the resulting net cash flows from the
projects, and discounting the net cash flows to their present value.

Remaining development efforts for these in-process R&D projects include
various phases of design, development, and testing. The anticipated completion
dates for the in-process R&D projects will occur within the next one and one
half years, after which the Company expects to begin generating economic
benefits from the technologies. Expenditures to complete these projects are
expected to total approximately $0.3 million in 1997 and $2.1 million in 1998.

These estimates are subject to change, given the uncertainties of the
development process, and no assurance can be given that deviations from these
estimates will not occur. Management expects to continue these development
efforts and believes the Company has a reasonable chance of successfully
completing the R&D programs. However, there is risk associated with the
completion of the projects and there is no assurance that any will meet with
either technological or commercial success. Failure to successfully complete the
in-process R&D programs would result in the loss of the expected economic return
inherent in the fair value allocation.

Interest expense increased 72% to $60.7 million in 1997 compared to $35.2
million in 1996. This increase primarily resulted from interest expense on the
approximately $1.6 billion of senior notes issued by the Company in 1996 and
1997. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by the retirement of
an earlier issuance of senior notes in the third quarter of 1997. Included in
1997 interest expense is $45.5 million of debt discount amortization and $1.9
million of deferred loan cost amortization, both of which are non-cash items.
Interest expense capitalized in connection with the Company's construction of
telecommunications equipment amounted to approximately $5 million in 1997.

Interest and other income increased 120% to $26.8 million in 1997 compared
to $12.2 million in 1996. This increase was primarily the result of interest
earned on the cash available from the proceeds of the issuances of securities in
1996 and 1997.

Preferred stock dividends and accretions of $43.7 million resulted from the
issuance in 1997 of three series of preferred stock. Preferred stock dividends
in the amount of $42.5 million were comprised of the issuance of an additional
3,442 shares of one series of the outstanding preferred stock valued at $34.4
million, in payment of the dividends due on such series of preferred stock, the
issuance of 86,854 shares of Common Stock valued at $3.2 million in payment of
dividends on a second series of preferred stock and an accrual of $4.9 million
representing the dividends payable on two series of the preferred stock in
January 1998. Accretions to liquidation preference for the three issues totaled
$1.2 million in 1997.

38
<PAGE> 41

EBITDA before certain charges decreased 248% to $(49.8) million in 1997
compared to $(14.3) million in 1996. This decline was the result of the
acceleration in the deployment of Intermedia's capital expansion plan, which
significantly increased growth oriented expenses, prior to realizing revenue
associated with these expenditures.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's operations have required substantial capital investment for
the purchase of telecommunications equipment and the design, construction and
development of the Company's networks. Capital expenditures for the Company were
approximately $473.2 million, $260.1, and $131.2 in 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively, excluding capital leases and telecommunications equipment acquired
in connection with business acquisitions. The Company expects that it will
continue to have substantial capital requirements in connection with the (i)
expansion and improvement of the Company's existing networks, (ii) design,
construction and development of new networks, (iii) connection of additional
buildings and customers to the Company's networks, (iv) purchase of switches
necessary for local exchange services and expansion of interexchange services
and (v) continued development of the Company's enhanced data services.

The Company has funded a substantial portion of these expenditures through
the public and private sale of debt and equity securities. From inception
through December 31, 1997, the Company raised approximately $212.6 million in
net proceeds from the sale of Common Stock, including Common Stock issued in
connection with certain acquisitions, $1.3 billion in net proceeds from the sale
of senior notes and $648.6 million in net proceeds from the sale of three series
of preferred stock. During 1998, the Company raised approximately $537.3 million
in net proceeds from the sale of senior notes, including over-allotment
exercises, and approximately $193.5 million in net proceeds from the sale of a
series of preferred stock. The Company also issued approximately 3.5 million
shares of Common Stock in exchange for approximately $75 million liquidation
preference of outstanding preferred stock pursuant to exchange agreements during
1998. All of the Company's issued series of preferred stock include provisions
that may cause the securities to be redeemed upon a change of control of the
Company. As a result of these redemption provisions, the Company is required to
classify the preferred stock outside of stockholders' equity on the Company's
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998. Additionally, none
of the outstanding series of preferred stock require the Company to pay cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. See "Risk Factors -- Substantial Debt."

The substantial capital investment required to build the Company's network
has resulted in negative cash flow after consideration of investing activities
over the last five-year period. This negative cash flow after investing
activities is a result of the requirement to build a substantial portion of the
Company's network before connecting revenue-generating customers. The Company
expects to continue to produce negative cash flow after investing activities for
the next several years due to the continuous expansion and the development of
the Company's networks. Until sufficient cash flow after investing activities is
generated, the Company will be required to utilize its current and future
capital resources, including the issuance of additional debt and/or equity
securities, to meet its cash flow requirements. See "Risk Factors -- History of
Net Losses; Limited Operations of Certain Services; Need for Additional
Capital."

In response to the new pro-competitive telecommunications environment, the
Company accelerated and expanded its capital deployment plan to allow for an
increased level of demand-driven capital spending necessary to more rapidly
exploit the market opportunity in the local exchange market. The Company expects
to commit substantial amounts of funds to expand its existing network in order
to switch traffic within the local service area in those states where it is
currently permitted to provide such services. As of December 31, 1998, the
Company was certified as a CLEC in 37 states plus the District of Columbia,
allowing the Company to provide local exchange services in those markets. The
Company expects to expend capital for the further development of the Company's
enhanced data service and interexchange service offerings.

A portion of the Company's expansion has occurred, and may continue to
occur, by means of acquisitions. In July 1997, the Company acquired DIGEX, a
leading nationwide business Internet service provider. The aggregate cash
consideration for the acquisition was approximately $160.0 million and was
funded with the Company's then existing cash reserves. In March 1998, the
Company acquired Shared. The

39
<PAGE> 42

total aggregate cash consideration for Shared was approximately $782.2 million,
which was paid out in 1997 and 1998, including certain transaction expenses and
fees relating to certain agreements. This amount includes repayment of $175.6
million of Shared's outstanding bank debt (including accrued interest and
outstanding fees) in connection with the consummation of the acquisition. In
March 1998, the Company completed its acquisition of LDS for a purchase price of
approximately $170.4 million, of which approximately $137.2 million was paid in
Common Stock and approximately $33.2 million was paid in cash, including the
repayment of approximately $15.1 million of LDS debt. On April 30, 1998, the
Company completed the acquisition of privately held National, an emerging
switch-based competitive local exchange carrier and established interexchange
carrier. Aggregate consideration for the acquisition was approximately $59.5
million in cash, plus 2,909,796 shares of the Company's Common Stock valued at
approximately $88.7 million, the retirement of $2.8 million in National's
long-term debt, and $2.2 million in acquisition related costs. See "Risk
Factors -- Risks Associated with Acquisitions and Expansion."

The Company's EBITDA before certain charges for 1998 was approximately
$28.9 million and its 1998 capital expenditures were $473.2 million (which does
not include the non-cash Williams network capacity purchase or other equipment
under capital leases), which were funded from available cash, including cash
generated from operations and the proceeds of offerings of the Company's
securities. On February 1, 1999, the Company's board of directors approved,
subject to consummation of the Offering, a 1999 capital expenditure budget of
approximately $480 million (which does not include the non-cash Williams network
capacity purchase and includes approximately $60 million of capital expenditures
associated with the Web hosting business). If the Offering is consummated, the
Company believes its business plan will be funded into the second half of 2000.
If the Offering is not consummated, management of the Company intends to arrange
alternate financing, such as the bank credit facility referred to below, or to
submit to the board of directors for its approval a scaled down capital
expenditure budget which can be funded through the end of 1999 from the
Company's existing resources. Depending on market conditions, the Company may
determine to raise additional capital at any time. There can be no assurance,
however, that the Company will be successful in raising sufficient debt or
equity on terms that it will consider acceptable. Moreover, the terms of the
Company's outstanding indebtedness and preferred stock impose certain
restrictions upon the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness or
issue additional preferred stock. The Company has entered discussions with
several banks for a bank credit facility, although there can be no assurance
that a bank facility on terms satisfactory to the Company will be established.

IMPACT OF YEAR 2000

The Year 2000 issue is the result of computer-controlled systems using two
digits rather than four to define the applicable year. For example, computer
programs that have time-sensitive software may recognize a date ending in "00"
as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in system failure
or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations including, among other
things, a temporary inability to process transactions, send invoices, or engage
in similar normal business activities. To ensure that its computer systems and
applications will function properly beyond 1999, the Company has implemented a
Year 2000 program.

40
<PAGE> 43

PROJECT AND STATE READINESS

The Company has developed a five-phase plan that is designed to assess the
impact of the Year 2000 issue on its information technology ("IT") and
non-information technology ("Non-IT"). This table represents management's best
estimates with respect to the mission-critical and non-mission-critical systems
as outlined below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PHASE COMPLETION IT COMPLETION NON-IT COMPLETION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
I. Preliminary Activity 100% 12/31/97 100% 12/31/97
II. Problem Determination 100% 9/30/98 80% 3/31/99
III. Plan Complete & Resources
Committed 90% 1/15/99 80% 1/31/99
IV. Operational Sustainability 70% 9/30/99 70% 9/30/99
V. Fully Compliant 70% 9/30/99 70% 9/30/99
</TABLE>

Due to the fact that it is not always necessary to complete one phase prior
to completing the next, some projects within a given phase have been started,
while there may be outstanding tasks associated with prior phases. Priority is
always placed on mission critical systems.

Phase I Preliminary Activity

This phase is a phase of awareness and education. The outcome of this phase
was Intermedia's understanding of the criticality, risks, size and scope of the
Year 2000 problem.

Phase II Problem Determination

In this phase, the Company performed an inventory and assessment to
determine which portions of its hardware and software would have to be replaced
or modified in order for its networks, office equipment and information
management systems to function properly after December 31, 1999. Such
determinations were based in part on representations made by hardware and
software vendors as to the Year 2000 compliance of systems utilized by the
Company. However, there can be no assurances that any vendor representations
received by the Company were accurate or complete. The Company also conducted a
risk assessment to identify those systems whose failure would be expected to
result in the greatest risk to the Company's business. As of December 31, 1998,
Phase II of the plan was 100% complete with respect to IT and 80% complete with
respect to Non-IT.

The Company expects to complete Phase II for its Non-IT by March 31, 1999.
However, much of the network equipment is located outside of the Company's
headquarters, and there can be no assurance that mission critical equipment has
not been overlooked.

Phase III Plan Complete & Resources Committed

During Phase III, the Company designed a plan to make the necessary
modifications to and/or replace the impacted software and hardware and committed
approximately $23,000 towards the completion of such a plan. While the Company
believes it has almost completed its plan for achieving Year 2000 compliance,
the discovery of additional IT or Non-IT systems requiring remediation could
adversely impact the current plan and the resources required to implement the
plan.

Phase IV Operational Sustainability

The Company is actively engaged in Phase IV, utilizing both internal and
external resources to reprogram, or replace, and test certain components of its
networks and information processing systems for Year 2000 compliance and
scheduling the installation of other necessary hardware and software upgrades.
Although the Company intends to conduct tests to ensure the equipment is Year
2000 compliant, it will focus primarily on those systems whose failure would
pose the greatest risks to the Company's operations. There can be no assurance
that the Company has not overlooked mission critical IT or Non-IT systems. The
Company will not likely test all of its equipment and will rely upon vendor
representations, if received, where tests are

41
<PAGE> 44

not conducted. There can be no assurance that any vendor representation will be
accurate or complete. As of December 31, 1998, Phase IV of the plan was 70%
complete for IT and 70% for Non-IT. The Company expects to complete Phase IV by
September 30, 1999.

Phase V Fully Compliant

The Company plans to be fully compliant no later than September 30, 1999,
which is prior to any anticipated impact on its operating systems. Though the
majority of the work will be completed by second quarter 1999, there are
elements that will not be completed (Phase V) until the third quarter of 1999
primarily due to limited availability of compliant software and hardware and
prioritization of mission critical systems. As of December 31, 1998, the Company
estimates that its remediation efforts are approximately 70% complete overall.

Intermedia is actively engaged in activities associated with Phase V with
respect to its core information systems and those of its recently acquired
subsidiaries, as well as with respect to the associated hardware and network
components. The Company believes that it has allocated adequate resources for
this purpose and expects its Year 2000 date conversion program to be
successfully completed on a timely basis. However, there can be no assurance
that it will successfully implement all of the necessary upgrades in a timely
manner. The Company presently believes that with modifications to existing
software and conversions to new software and hardware, the Year 2000 issue will
not pose significant operational problems for its systems or have any adverse
impact on the Company's customers or business units. However, if such
modifications and conversions are not made, or are not completed in a timely
fashion, the Year 2000 problems could have a material impact on the operations
of the Company.

COSTS

The five-phase plan encompasses enterprise-wide projects which include
updating or replacing certain of the Company's core business systems as well
those of its recently acquired subsidiaries. The Company has tracked Year 2000
costs on an enterprise-wide basis segregating its internal and external costs
and hardware and software costs. The internal costs are comprised of employee
hours, and external costs are comprised of outside consultant costs.

The cost estimates presented below do not include system upgrades that
would otherwise result as part of the Company's capital expenditure program
associated with integrating the acquired companies. The estimated costs of the
project and the date which the Company has established to complete the Year 2000
modifications are based on management's best estimates, which were derived
utilizing numerous assumptions of future events, including the continued
availability of certain resources, third party modification plans and other
factors. However, there can be no guarantee that these estimates will be
achieved and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated.
Specific factors that might cause such material differences include, but are not
limited to, the availability and cost of personnel trained in this area, the
ability to locate and correct all relevant computer codes, unanticipated mergers
and acquisitions, and similar uncertainties.

A summary of historical and estimated costs for the Year 2000 project are
listed below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXTERNAL INTERNAL
----------------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Historical to date $2,939,232 $990,100
Estimated for 1999 3,447,630 305,100

SOFTWARE/HARDWARE
Historical to date $7,736,415
Estimated for 1999 7,602,955
</TABLE>

RISKS AND CONTINGENCY PLAN

While the Company is working to test its own mission-critical systems for
Year 2000 compliance, the Company does not control the systems of it suppliers.
The Company is currently seeking assurance form its suppliers and strategic
business partners regarding the Year 2000 readiness of their systems. The
Company is

42
<PAGE> 45

currently planning interoperability tests to ensure that its suppliers' and
business partners' systems will accurately interact with the Company's systems
into and beyond the Year 2000. Notwithstanding these measures there is some risk
that the interaction of the Company's systems and those of its suppliers or
business partners may be impacted by the Year 2000 date change. In addition, in
light of the vast interconnection and interoperability of telecommunications
networks worldwide, the ability of any telecommunications provider, including
the Company, to provide services to its customers (e.g., to complete calls and
transport data and to bill for such services) is dependent, to some extent, on
the networks and systems of other carriers. To the extent the networks and
systems of those carriers are adversely impacted by Year 2000 problems, the
ability of the Company to service its customers may be adversely impacted as
well. Any such impact could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
operations.

The failure to correct a material Year 2000 problem could result in an
interruption in, or a failure of, certain normal business activities or
operations. Such failures could materially and adversely affect the Company's
results of operations, liquidity and financial conditions. Due to the general
uncertainty inherent in the Year 2000 problem, resulting in part form the
uncertainty of the Year 2000 readiness of third-party suppliers and customers,
the Company is unable to determine at this time whether the consequences of Year
2000 failures will have a material impact on the Company's results of
operations, liquidity or financial condition. The 2000 Project is expected to
significantly reduce the Company's level of uncertainty about the Year 2000
problem and, in particular, about the Year 2000 compliance and readiness of its
material suppliers and business partners. The Company believes that, with the
implementation of new business systems and completion of the Year 2000 project
as scheduled, the possibility of significant interruptions of normal operations
should be reduced.

In a recent Securities and Exchange Commission release regarding Year 2000
disclosure, the Securities and Exchange Commission stated that public companies
must disclose the most reasonably likely worst case Year 2000 scenario. Although
it is not possible to assess the likelihood of any of the following events, each
must be included in a consideration of worst case scenarios: widespread failure
of electrical, gas, and similar supplies serving the Company; widespread
disruption of the services provided by common communications carriers; similar
disruption to the means and modes of transportation for the Company and its
employees, contractors, suppliers, and customers; significant disruption to the
Company's ability to gain access to, and remain working in, office buildings and
other facilities; the failure of substantial numbers of the Company's critical
computer hardware and software systems, including both internal business systems
and systems controlling operational facilities such as electrical generation,
transmission, and distribution systems; and the failure of outside entities'
systems, including systems related to banking and finance.

If the Company cannot operate effectively after December 31, 1999, the
Company could, among other things, face substantial claims by customers or loss
of revenue due to service interruptions, inability to fulfill contractual
obligations or to bill customers accurately and on a timely basis, and increased
expenses associated with litigation, stabilization of operations following
critical system failures, and the execution of contingency plans. The Company
could also experience an inability by customers and others to pay, on a timely
basis or at all, obligations owned to the Company. Under these circumstances,
the adverse effects, although not quantifiable at this time, would be material.

The Company believes that its critical systems will be Year 2000 compliant
before January 1, 2000. The Company's Executive Steering Committee is scheduled
to convene first quarter 1999 to oversee and allocate additional resource, if
required, for the final plans for Year 2000 readiness. Having identified the
mission-critical systems of the Company and its key suppliers, and the
associated risks of failure to ensure that those systems are Year 2000 ready,
the Company is in the process of devising contingency plans which will be
implemented in the event any such systems are not Year 2000 compliant in a
timely manner. Business continuity plans are under development by the Company
and will be ready for implementation by the third quarter of 1999.

43
<PAGE> 46

INCOME TAXES

The Company recorded no current net income tax expense in 1998. At December
31, 1998, a full valuation allowance was provided on net deferred tax assets of
$296.4 million based upon the Company's history of losses over the past several
years and the uncertainty surrounding the Company's ability to recognize such
assets. The valuation allowance relates primarily to net operating losses and
high yield debt obligations.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information" ("Statement 131"), which establishes standards for
segment reporting and disclosure of additional information on products and
services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company has determined that
it has one reportable operating segment. The adoption of Statement 131 resulted
in additional financial statement disclosures.

In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("Statement
130"). Statement 130 establishes standards for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive
income, as defined, is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a
period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
sources. The provisions of Statement 130 are effective for periods beginning
after December 15, 1997.

IMPACT OF INFLATION

Inflation has not had a significant impact on Intermedia's operations over
the past three years.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE

While all of the Company's long term debt bears fixed interest rates, the
fair market value of the Company's fixed rate long-term debt is sensitive to
changes in interest rates. The Company runs the risk that market rates will
decline and the required payments will exceed those based on current market
rate. Under its current policies, the Company does not use interest rate
derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate changes.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements listed in Item 14 are included in this report
beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference from
the information captioned "Proposal One: Election of Directors" and "Executive
Officers" to be included in the Company's proxy statement to be filed in
connection with the annual meeting of stockholders, to be held on May 20, 1999
(the "Proxy Statement").

44
<PAGE> 47

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from
the information captioned "Executive Compensation," "Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Comparative Stock Performance" to be
included in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference from
the information captioned "Beneficial Ownership" to be included in the Proxy
Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by the Item 13 is incorporated by reference from
the information captioned "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" to be
included in the Proxy statement.

PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and the
notes thereto, the related reports thereon of the independent certified public
accountants, and financial statement schedules, are filed pursuant to Item 8 of
this Report:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- INTERMEDIA
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants.......... F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1997 and 1998... F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1997, and 1998......................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997, and 1998..... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1997, and 1998......................... F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-6
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES -- INTERMEDIA
Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts............ F-30
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- SHARED
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants.......... F-31
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1996 and 1997... F-32
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1996, and 1997......................... F-34
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996, and 1997..... F-35
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1996, and 1997......................... F-36
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-37
</TABLE>

All other financial statement schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") are not required pursuant to the instructions to Item 8 or are
inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

45
<PAGE> 48

REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

The following Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed during in the fourth
quarter of 1998:

Intermedia filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 27, 1998,
reporting under Item 5 the issuance of a press release discussing the Company's
third quarter results. The Company also reported under Item 7 the filing of the
press release.

EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER EXHIBIT
- ------ -------
<C> <C> <S>
2.1 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 4, 1997,
among Intermedia, Daylight Acquisition Corp. and DIGEX.
Exhibit 99(c)(1) to Intermedia's Schedule 14D-1 filed with
the Commission on June 11, 1997 is incorporated herein by
reference.
2.2 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 20, 1997,
by and among Intermedia, Moonlight Acquisition Corp. and
Shared. Exhibit 99(c)(1) to Intermedia's Schedule 14D-1 and
Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on November 26, 1997
is incorporated herein by reference.
2.3 -- Acquisition Agreement, dated as of December 17, 1997, among
Intermedia and the holders of interest in the Long Distance
Savers companies. Exhibit 2.3 to Amendment No. 1 to
Intermedia's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with
the Commission on January 14, 1998 (No. 333-42999) is
incorporated herein by reference.
2.4 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 11, 1998,
among Intermedia, Sumter One Acquisition, Inc., Sumter Two
Acquisition, Inc., National Telecommunications of Florida,
Inc., NTC, Inc. and the stockholders of National. Exhibit
2.4 to Intermedia's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed
with the Commission on February 13, 1998 (No. 333-46369) is
incorporated herein by reference.
3.1 -- Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Intermedia,
together with all amendments thereto. Exhibit 3.1 to
Intermedia's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with
the Commission on June 16, 1998 (No. 333-56939) (the "Form
S-4") incorporated herein by reference.
3.2 -- By-laws of Intermedia, together with all amendments thereto.
Exhibit 3.2 to Intermedia's Registration Statement on Form
S-1, filed with the Commission on November 8, 1993 (No.
33-69052) (the "Form S-1") is incorporated herein by
reference.
4.1 -- Indenture, dated as of June 2, 1995, between Intermedia and
SunBank National Association, as trustee. Exhibit 4.1 to
Intermedia's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 20, 1995 (No.
33-93622) is incorporated herein by reference.
4.1(a) -- Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of April 26, 1996,
between Intermedia and SunTrust Bank, Central Florida,
National Association, as trustee. Exhibit 4.1 to
Intermedia's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on April 29, 1996 is incorporated herein by
reference.
4.2 -- Indenture, dated as of May 14, 1996, between Intermedia and
SunTrust Bank, Central Florida, National Association, as
trustee. Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Intermedia's
Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Commission
on April 18, 1996 (No. 33-34738) is incorporated herein by
reference.
4.3 -- Indenture, dated as of July 9, 1997, between Intermedia and
SunTrust Bank, Central Florida, National Association, as
trustee. Exhibit 4.1 to Intermedia's Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Commission on July 17, 1997 is
incorporated herein by reference.
</TABLE>

46
<PAGE> 49

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER EXHIBIT
- ------ -------
<C> <C> <S>
4.4 -- Indenture, dated as of October 30, 1997, between Intermedia
and SunTrust Bank, Central Florida, National Association, as
trustee. Exhibit 4.1 to Intermedia's Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Commission on November 6, 1997 is
incorporated herein by reference.
4.5 -- Indenture, dated as of December 23, 1997, between Intermedia
and SunTrust Bank, Central Florida, National Association, as
trustee. Exhibit 4.5 to Intermedia's Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (Commission File No. 333-44875) filed with the
Commission on April 18, 1996 is incorporated herein by
reference.
4.6 -- Indenture, dated as of May 27, 1998, between Intermedia and
SunTrust Bank, Central Florida, National Association, as
trustee. Exhibit 4.6 to Intermedia's Form S-4 is
incorporated herein by reference..
4.7 -- Rights Agreement dated as of March 7, 1996, between
Intermedia and Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company.
Exhibit 4.1 to Intermedia's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on March 12, 1996 is incorporated herein
by reference.
4.7(a) -- Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of February 20, 1997
between Intermedia and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company. Exhibit 4.4(a) to Intermedia's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 is
incorporated herein by reference.
4.7(b) -- Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 1998
between Intermedia and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company. Exhibit 4.6(b) to Intermedia's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (the "1997 Form 10-K") is incorporated herein by
reference.
10.1 -- 1992 Stock Option Plan. Exhibit 10.1 to the Form S-1 is
incorporated herein by reference.
10.1(a) -- Amendment to 1992 Stock Option Plan dated May 20, 1993.
Exhibit 10.1(b) to the Form S-1 is incorporated herein by
reference.
10.1(b) -- Amendment to 1992 Stock Option Plan dated as of December 16,
1997. Exhibit 10.1(b) to Intermedia's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (the "1997 Form
10-K") is incorporated herein by reference.
10.2 -- Long Term Incentive Plan. Exhibit 10.1(c) to Intermedia's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995 (the "1995 Form 10-K") is incorporated herein by
reference.
10.2(a) -- Amendment to Long Term Incentive Plan dated as of December
16, 1997. Exhibit 10.2(a) to Intermedia's 1997 Form 10-K is
incorporated herein by reference.
10.3 -- 1997 Equity Participation Plan for the Benefit of Employees
of DIGEX. Exhibit 10.3 to Intermedia's 1997 Form 10-K is
incorporated herein by reference.
10.4 -- 1997 Stock Option Plan for the Benefit of employees of
DIGEX. Exhibit 10.4 to Intermedia's 1997 Form 10-K is
incorporated herein by reference.
10.5 -- David C. Ruberg Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1993,
between David C. Ruberg and Intermedia. Exhibit 10.2 to
Intermedia's 1995 Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference.
10.6 -- Letter Agreement dated August 27, 1996 between Robert M.
Manning and Intermedia. Exhibit 10.6 to Intermedia's 1997
Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
10.8 -- Letter Agreement dated April 21, 1998 between E. Trevor
Dignall and Intermedia.
10.9 -- Letter Agreement dated December 23, 1998 between Richard J.
Buyens and Intermedia.
10.10 -- Sublease, dated August 28, 1995, between Intermedia and
Pharmacy Management Services, Inc. for its principal
executive offices located at 3625 Queen Palm Drive, Tampa,
Florida. Exhibit 10.3 to Intermedia's 1995 Form 10-K is
incorporated herein by reference.
</TABLE>

47
<PAGE> 50

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER EXHIBIT
- ------ -------
<C> <C> <S>
10.11 -- 401(k) Plan. Exhibit 10.20 to Intermedia's Form S-1 is
incorporated herein by reference.
12.1 -- Statement Re: Computation of Ratios.
21 -- Subsidiaries of Intermedia.
23.1 -- Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
23.2 -- Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
27 -- Financial Data Schedule (for SEC use only)
</TABLE>

48
<PAGE> 51

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC.
(Registrant)

By:
/s/ DAVID C. RUBERG
------------------------------------
David C. Ruberg
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

February 22, 1999

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>
Principal Executive Officer:

/s/ DAVID C. RUBERG Chairman of the Board, February 22, 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------- President and Chief
David C. Ruberg Executive Officer

Principal Financial and Accounting Officers:

/s/ ROBERT M. MANNING Senior Vice President and February 22, 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer
Robert M. Manning

/s/ JEANNE M. WALTERS Vice President, Controller February 22, 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------- and Chief Accounting
Jeanne M. Walters Officer

Other Directors:

/s/ JOHN C. BAKER February 22, 1999
- -----------------------------------------------------
John C. Baker

/s/ GEORGE F. KNAPP February 19, 1999
- -----------------------------------------------------
George F. Knapp

/s/ PHILIP A. CAMPBELL February 22, 1999
- -----------------------------------------------------
Philip A. Campbell

February , 1999
- -----------------------------------------------------
Pierce Jackson Roberts, Jr.
</TABLE>

49
<PAGE> 52

GLOSSARY

Access Charges -- The charges paid by a carrier to a LEC for the
origination or termination of the carrier's traffic.

Access Line -- A circuit that connects a telephone user (customer) to the
public switched network. The access line usually connects to a telephone at the
customer's end.

Access Line Equivalents ("ALEs") -- Represents Intermedia's method of
quantifying its local exchange service. ALEs are calculated by adding the number
of "line service" local switch ports (those connecting to a telephone instrument
or equivalent device) to the product of 2.5 times the number of "trunk service"
ports (those connecting to a PBX, Key System, or similar device).

ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) -- A modern information transfer standard
that allows "packets" of voice and data to share a transmission circuit. ATM
provides much greater efficiency than the traditional method of transmitting
voice signal over a Circuit Switched Network.

Bandwidth -- The bit rate of digital signals that can be supported by a
circuit or device. The bandwidth of a particular circuit is generally determined
by the medium itself (wire, fiber optic cable, etc.) and the device that
transmits the signal to the transmission medium (laser, audio amplifier, etc.).

Central Office -- The switching center and/or central circuit termination
facility of a local telephone company.

Centrex -- A central office based business telephone service that roughly
provides the user with the same services as a PBX, without the capital
investment in the PBX. Centrex services include station to station dialing (2
through 5 digits), customized long distance call handling and user-input
authorization codes.

Circuit Switched Network -- A telecommunications network that establishes
connections by linking together physical telecommunications circuits, either as
pairs of wires or dedicated channels on high capacity transport facilities such
as fiber optic systems. These connections are maintained for the duration of the
call through one or more telephone switches, as opposed to packet or cell
switched connections, which are virtual, often utilizing many physical paths or
routes to connect the communicating parties. Traditional voice telephone
networks are circuit switched networks.

CLEC (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier) -- A telephone service provider
(carrier) that offers services similar to the former monopoly local telephone
company. A CLEC may also provide other types of telecommunications services
(long distance, data, etc.).

CLEC Certification -- Granted by a state public service commission or
public utility commission, this certification provides a telecommunications
services provider with the legal standing to offer local exchange telephone
services in direct competition with the ILEC and other CLECs. Such
certifications are granted on a state by state basis.

Collocation -- A location serving as the interface point for the
interconnection of a CLEC's network to the network of an ILEC or another CLEC.
Collocation can be 1) physical, where the CLEC "builds" a fiber optic network
extension into the ILEC's or CLEC's central office, or 2) virtual, where the
ILEC or CLEC leases a facility, similar to that which it might build, to affect
a presence in the ILEC's or CLEC's central office.

Communications Act of 1934 -- The first major federal legislation that
established rules for broadcast and non-broadcast communications, including both
wireless and wire line telephone service.

Connected Building -- A building that is connected to a carrier's network
via a non-switched circuit that is managed and monitored by that carrier.

CPE (Customer Premises Equipment) -- The devices and systems that interface
a customer's voice or data telecommunications application to a provider's
network. CPE includes devices and systems such as PBXs, key systems, routers and
ISDN terminal adapters.

50
<PAGE> 53

Dedicated Access -- A circuit, not shared among multiple customers, that
connects a customer to a carrier's network.

DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) -- A modern telephone technology that allows
high-speed voice and data traffic to travel over ordinary copper telephone
wires.

DWDM (Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing) -- A technology that allows
multiple optical signals to be combined so that they can be aggregated as a
group and transported over a single fiber to increase capacity.

Enhanced Data Services -- Data networking services provided on a
sophisticated, software managed transport and switching network, such as a frame
relay or ATM data network.

Ethernet -- A popular standard for local area networks. The Ethernet
connects servers and clients within a building or within other proximate areas.
Ethernets typically pass data at 10 million bits per second (Mbs) or 100 Mbs.

Dark Fiber -- Fiber which does not have connected to it the electronics
required to transmit data on such fiber.

FCC (Federal Communications Commission) -- The U.S. Government organization
charged with the oversight of all public communications media.

Frame Relay -- A transport technology that organizes data into units called
frames, with variable bit length, designed to move information that is "bursty"
in nature.

ICP (Integrated Communications Provider) -- A telecommunications carrier
that provides packaged or integrated services from among a broad range of
categories, including local exchange service, long distance service, enhanced
data service, Internet service and other communications services.

ILEC (Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier) -- The local exchange carrier that
was the monopoly carrier, prior to the opening of local exchange services to
competition.

Integration Services -- The provision of specialized equipment to meet
specific customer needs, as well as the services to implement and support this
equipment.

Interconnection (co-carrier) Agreement -- A contract between an ILEC and a
CLEC for the interconnection of the two's networks, for the purpose of mutual
passing of traffic between the networks, allowing customers of one of the
networks to call users served by the other network. These agreements set out the
financial and operational aspects of such interconnection.

Interexchange Services -- Telecommunications services that are provided
between two exchange areas, generally meaning between two cities. These services
can be either voice or data.

ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network) -- A modern telephone technology
that combines voice and data switching in an efficient manner.

ISP (Internet Service Provider) -- A telecommunications service provider
who provides access to the Internet, for dial access, and/or dedicated access.

IXC (Interexchange Carrier) -- A provider of telecommunications services
that extend between exchanges (LATAS), or cities, also called long distance
carrier.

Kbps -- Kilobits per second, or thousands of bits per second, a unit of
measure of data transmission.

Key System -- A device that allows several telephones to share access to
multiple telephone lines and to dial each other with abbreviated dialing schemes
(1 to 4 digits). Modern key sets often include features such as speed dial, call
forward, and others.

LAN (Local Area Network) -- A connection of computing devices within a
building or other small area, which may extend up to a few thousand feet. The
LAN allows the data and applications connected to one computer to be available
to others on the LAN.
51
<PAGE> 54

LATA (Local Access Transport Area) -- A geographic area inside of which a
LEC can offer switched telecommunications services, including local toll
service. There are 161 LATAs in the continental United States.

LEC (Local Exchange Carrier) -- Any telephone service provider offering
local exchange services.

Local Exchange -- An area inside of which telephone calls are generally
completed without any toll, or long distance charges. Local exchange areas are
defined by the state regulator of telephone services.

Local Exchange Services -- Telephone services that are provided within a
local exchange. These usually refer to local calling services (dial tone
services). Business local exchange services include Centrex, access lines and
trunks, and ISDN.

Mbps -- Megabits per second, or millions of bits per second, a unit of
measure for the transmission of data.

Number Portability -- The ability of a local exchange service customer of
an ILEC to keep their existing telephone number, while moving their service to a
CLEC.

Packet/Cell Switching Network -- A method of transmitting messages as
digitized bits, assembled in groups called packets or cells. These packets and
cells contain industry-standard defined numbers of data bits, along with
addressing information and data integrity bits. Packet/Cell Switching networks,
originally used only for the transmission of digital data, are being implemented
by carriers such as Intermedia to transport digitized voice, along with other
data. The switching (or routing) of the packets or cells of data replace the
"circuit-switching" of traditional voice telephone calls. Packet and cell
switching is considered to be a more cost efficient method of delivering voice
and data traffic.

PBX (Private Branch Exchange) -- A telephone switching system designed to
operate on the premises of the user. The PBX functions much like a telephone
company central office. A PBX connects stations (telephones) to each other and
to lines and trunks that connect the PBX to the public network and/or private
telephone networks. A PBX usually provides telephone service to a single
company, but, as in the case of shared tenant services, a PBX can be operated
within a building to provide service to multiple customers.

Peering -- The commercial practice under which nationwide ISPs exchange
traffic without the payment of settlement charges.

Peering Points -- A location at which ISPs exchange traffic.

Point of Presence -- A location where a carrier, usually an IXC, has
located transmission and terminating equipment to connect its network to the
networks of other carriers, or to customers.

Public Switched Network -- The collection of ILEC, CLEC and IXC telephone
networks (switches and transmission routes) that allow telephones and other
devices to dial a standardized number and reach any other device connected to
the public network. This is contrasted to private networks, access to which is
limited to certain users, typically offices of a business or governmental
agency.

RBOC (Regional Bell Operating Company) -- One of the ILECs created by the
court ordered divestiture of the local exchange business by AT&T. These are
BellSouth, Bell Atlantic, Ameritech, US West, and SBC.

Shared Tenant Services -- The provision of telecommunications services to
multiple tenants within a building or building complex by allowing these users
to have shared access to telephone lines and other telephone services, for the
purpose of reducing the user's need to own and operate its own
telecommunications equipment and to reduce cost.

Special Access Services -- Private, non-switched connections between an IXC
and a customer, for the purpose of connecting the customer's long distance calls
to the IXC's network, without having to pay the LEC's access charges.

52
<PAGE> 55

Tier-one national ISP -- An Internet services provider whose network
connects directly to other such Internet providers at the nation's six major
peering points.

VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal) -- A satellite communication system
that comprises a small diameter (approximately 1 meter in diameter) antennae and
electronics to establish a communications terminal, used mostly for data. VSAT
networks compete with other, land-line based networks such as private lines and
frame relay.

Web Site -- A server connected to the Internet from which Internet users
can obtain information.

World Wide Web or Web -- A collection of computer systems supporting a
communications protocol that permits multi-media presentation of information
over the Internet.

53
<PAGE> 56

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors
Intermedia Communications Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Intermedia
Communications Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1998. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the
Index at Item 14. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Intermedia Communications Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1997 and 1998,
and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material aspects the
information set forth therein.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Tampa, Florida
February 8, 1999

F-1
<PAGE> 57

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1997 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 756,923 $ 387,615
Restricted investments.................................... 6,853 7,930
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $4,251 in 1997 and $22,229 in 1998................... 58,579 178,519
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................. 6,122 27,272
---------- ----------
Total current assets........................................ 828,477 601,336
Telecommunications equipment, net........................... 463,846 1,371,583
Intangible assets, net...................................... 138,028 1,022,556
Investment in Shared Technologies Fairchild Inc............. 403,571 --
Other assets................................................ 41,048 53,544
---------- ----------
Total assets....................................... $1,874,970 $3,049,019
========== ==========
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 53,630 $ 102,905
Accrued taxes............................................. 2,448 15,704
Accrued interest.......................................... 4,639 23,156
Other accrued expenses.................................... 5,792 29,340
Advance billings.......................................... 7,251 13,888
Current portion of long-term debt......................... 601 661
Current portion of capital lease obligations.............. 6,870 21,219
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities................................... 81,231 206,873
Long term debt.............................................. 1,224,455 1,847,858
Capital lease obligations................................... 20,417 502,648
Series B redeemable exchangeable preferred stock and accrued
dividends, $1.00 par value; 600,000 shares authorized;
334,420 and 381,900 shares issued and outstanding in 1997
and 1998, respectively.................................... 323,146 371,678
Series D junior convertible preferred stock, $1.00 par
value; 69,000 shares authorized, 69,000 and 54,129 issued
and outstanding in 1997 and 1998, respectively............ 169,722 133,686
Series E junior convertible preferred stock, $1.00 par
value; 87,500 shares authorized; 80,000 and 64,892 shares
issued and outstanding in 1997 and 1998, respectively..... 196,008 160,086
Series F junior convertible preferred stock, $1.00 par
value; 92,000 shared authorized: 80,000 shared issued and
outstanding in 1998....................................... -- 196,838
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 14)
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 1,211,000 and 1,111,500
shares authorized in 1997 and 1998, no shares issued.... -- --
Series C preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 40,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued............................ -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 and 150,000,000
shares authorized in 1997 and 1998, respectively;
34,890,600 and 48,648,993 shares issued and outstanding
in 1997 and 1998, respectively.......................... 350 486
Additional paid-in capital................................ 243,939 587,413
Accumulated deficit....................................... (376,006) (953,579)
Deferred compensation..................................... (8,292) (4,968)
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' deficit................................. (140,009) (370,648)
---------- ----------
Total liabilities, redeemable preferred stock and
stockholders' deficit..................................... $1,874,970 $3,049,019
========== ==========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-2
<PAGE> 58

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1996 1997 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Local network services................................ $ 13,524 $ 41,967 $ 163,424
Enhanced data services................................ 31,674 86,636 181,635
Interexchange services................................ 53,136 113,152 266,370
Integration equipment sales and services.............. 5,063 6,144 101,354
----------- ----------- -----------
103,397 247,899 712,783
Expenses:
Network expenses...................................... 69,109 164,461 337,625
Facilities administration and maintenance............. 7,603 31,663 66,061
Cost of goods sold.................................... 4,393 3,015 65,094
Selling, general, and administrative.................. 36,610 98,598 215,109
Depreciation and amortization......................... 19,836 53,613 229,747
Charge off of purchased in-process R&D................ -- 60,000 63,000
Business restructuring, integration and other
charges............................................ -- -- 53,453
----------- ----------- -----------
137,551 411,350 1,030,089
----------- ----------- -----------
Loss from operations.................................... (34,154) (163,451) (317,306)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense...................................... (35,213) (60,662) (205,760)
Interest and other income............................. 12,168 26,824 35,837
----------- ----------- -----------
Loss before extraordinary item.......................... (57,199) (197,289) (487,229)
Extraordinary loss on early retirement of debt.......... -- (43,834) --
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss................................................ (57,199) (241,123) (487,229)
Preferred stock dividends and accretions................ -- (43,742) (90,344)
----------- ----------- -----------
Loss attributable to common stockholders................ $ (57,199) $ (284,865) $ (577,573)
=========== =========== ===========
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss attributable to common stockholders before
extraordinary item................................. $ (2.04) $ (7.23) $ (13.23)
Extraordinary item.................................... -- (1.31) --
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss per common share............................. $ (2.04) $ (8.54) $ (13.23)
=========== =========== ===========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding -- basic
and diluted........................................... 28,035,194 33,340,180 43,645,067
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-3
<PAGE> 59

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL STOCKHOLDERS'
------------------- PAID-IN ACCUMULATED DEFERRED EQUITY
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT COMPENSATION (DEFICIENCY)
---------- ------ ---------- ----------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1996................. 20,719,542 $206 $ 73,990 $ (33,942) $ -- $ 40,254
Sale of common stock..................... 9,349,006 94 111,624 -- -- 111,718
Issuance of shares of common stock for
business combinations.................. 1,937,760 20 17,757 -- -- 17,777
Exercise of stock options and warrants at
prices ranging from $2.10 to $13.53 per
share.................................. 164,372 2 705 -- -- 707
Issuance of stock options under long-term
compensation plan...................... -- -- 3,575 -- (3,575) --
Issuance of common stock under long-term
compensation plan...................... 400,000 4 4,996 -- (5,000) --
Amortization of deferred compensation.... -- -- -- -- 973 973
Net loss................................. -- -- -- (57,199) -- (57,199)
---------- ---- -------- --------- ------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1996............... 32,570,680 326 212,647 (91,141) (7,602) 114,230
Exercise of stock options and warrants at
prices ranging from $0.26 to $20.86 per
share.................................. 1,816,192 18 4,952 -- -- 4,970
Issuance of 19,350 stock options under
long-term compensation plan............ -- -- 179 -- (179) --
Issuance of common stock under long-term
compensation plan...................... 330,000 3 4,947 -- (4,950) --
Net changes to stock options............. -- -- (2,836) -- 2,836 --
Amortization of deferred compensation.... -- -- -- -- 1,603 1,603
Issuance of 2,355,674 stock options in
connection with the DIGEX
acquisition............................ -- -- 19,380 -- -- 19,380
Issuance of stock warrant in conjunction
with STFI acquisition.................. -- -- 1,455 -- -- 1,455
Issuance of common stock for dividends on
Series D Preferred Stock............... 173,728 2 3,216 (3,218) -- --
Preferred stock dividends and
accretions............................. -- -- -- (40,524) -- (40,524)
Net loss................................. -- -- -- (241,123) -- (241,123)
---------- ---- -------- --------- ------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1997............... 34,890,600 349 243,940 (376,006) (8,292) (140,009)
Exercise of stock options and warrants at
prices ranging from $0.26 to $29.00 per
share.................................. 1,245,665 12 8,423 -- -- 8,435
Issuance of common stock for dividends on
Series D Preferred Stock............... 371,307 4 11,421 (11,425) -- --
Issuance of common stock for dividends on
Series E Preferred Stock............... 413,566 4 12,790 (12,794) -- --
Issuance of common stock for dividends on
Series F Preferred Stock............... 93,602 1 2,216 (2,217) -- --
Issuance of shares of common stock for
LDS business combination............... 5,359,748 54 137,122 -- -- 137,176
Issuance of shares of common stock for
National business combination.......... 2,909,796 29 88,720 -- -- 88,749
Conversion of Series D Preferred Stock to
Common Stock........................... 2,028,940 20 40,917 (4,702) -- 36,235
Conversion of Series E Preferred Stock to
Common Stock........................... 1,422,953 14 43,011 (6,278) -- 36,747
Forfeitures of and other changes to stock
options and stock grants............... (97,000) (1) (1,237) -- 1,238 --
Amortization of deferred compensation.... -- -- -- -- 2,086 2,086
Other equity adjustments................. 9,816 -- 90 -- -- 90
Preferred stock dividends and
accretions............................. -- -- -- (52,928) -- (52,928)
Net loss................................. -- -- -- (487,229) -- (487,229)
---------- ---- -------- --------- ------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1998............... 48,648,993 $486 $587,413 $(953,579) $(4,968) $(370,648)
========== ==== ======== ========= ======= =========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-4
<PAGE> 60

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------
1996 1997 1998
--------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss.................................................... $ (57,199) $ (241,123) $(487,229)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization............................. 21,088 55,531 234,275
Amortization of deferred compensation..................... 973 1,603 3,323
Non cash restructuring charges............................ -- -- 17,510
Accretion of interest on notes payable.................... 14,304 44,629 84,864
Imputed interest related to business acquisitions......... -- -- 6,164
Extraordinary loss........................................ -- 43,834 --
Charge off of purchased in-process R&D.................... -- 60,000 63,000
Provision for doubtful accounts........................... 2,285 6,858 14,786
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable..................................... (13,150) (40,858) (91,344)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets............... (1,703) (554) (13,347)
Other assets............................................ (178) (1,948) (3,460)
Accounts payable........................................ 22,326 15,079 11,622
Other accrued expenses and taxes........................ 2,108 (2,143) 19,554
Advance billings........................................ 1,390 19 (341)
--------- ----------- ---------
Net cash used in operating activities....................... (7,756) (59,073) (140,623)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of telecommunications equipment, net.............. (130,590) (260,105) (473,197)
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired.................. (12,401) (551,956) (466,366)
Purchases/maturities of restricted investments.............. 14,667 30,303 (1,077)
Purchases/maturities of short-term investments.............. (6,041) 6,041 --
--------- ----------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities....................... (134,365) (775,717) (940,640)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance
costs..................................................... 170,862 957,661 537,300
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock, net of issuance
costs..................................................... -- 648,352 193,485
Payments on long-term debt.................................. (1,321) (200,966) (759)
Payments on capital leases.................................. (1,296) (7,850) (26,506)
Exercise of stock warrants and options...................... 707 4,970 8,435
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs... 111,718 -- --
--------- ----------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities................... 280,670 1,402,167 711,955
--------- ----------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents............ 138,549 567,377 (369,308)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year.............. 50,997 189,546 756,923
--------- ----------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year.................... $ 189,546 $ 756,923 $ 387,615
========= =========== =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid............................................... $ 23,437 $ 12,917 $ 97,940
Schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Assets acquired under capital lease....................... 252 15,666 511,251
Common Stock, warrants and options issued in purchase of
businesses.............................................. -- 19,380 225,925
Common stock issued as dividends on preferred stock....... -- 3,218 55,168
Preferred stock issued as dividends on preferred stock.... -- -- 32,140
Accretion of preferred stock.............................. -- 1,217 3,036
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-5
<PAGE> 61

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BUSINESS

Intermedia Communications Inc. and Subsidiaries (Intermedia or the Company)
is an integrated communications services provider offering a full suite of
local, long-distance and high-speed data and Internet services to business and
government customers, long distance carriers, Internet service providers,
resellers and wireless communications companies. Services include data and video
telecommunications services, frame relay, Internet access services, local
exchange services and long-distance services. The Company offers its full
product package of telecommunications services to customers throughout the
country with a focus on the eastern half of the United States.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS

Restricted investments consist of certificates of deposit which are
restricted to collateralize certain letters of credit required by the different
municipalities to ensure the Company's performance related to network expansion.

TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT

Telecommunications equipment is stated at cost. Equipment held under
capital leases is stated at the lower of fair value of the asset or the net
present value of the minimum lease payment at the inception of the lease.
Depreciation expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Telecommunications equipment................................ 2 - 7 years
Fiber optic cable........................................... 20 years
Furniture and fixtures...................................... 5 - 7 years
Equipment held under capital leases......................... Lease term
</TABLE>

Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over
the shorter of the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the
improvements.

F-6
<PAGE> 62
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

The Company constructs certain of its own transmission systems and related
facilities. Internal costs related directly to the construction of such
facilities, including interest, overhead costs and salaries or certain
employees, are capitalized.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets arose in connection with business combinations. They are
stated at cost and include purchased customer lists, developed technology,
workforce, tradenames and goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets are amortized
using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from
two to ten years. Goodwill is amortized using the straight-line method over
periods of eight to forty years, with a weighted average of approximately
nineteen years at December 31, 1998.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

In accordance with Statement of Accounting Standard No. 121, Accounting for
the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of
(SFAS 121), the Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may
not be recoverable. This review consists of a comparison of the carrying value
of the asset with the asset's expected future undiscounted cash flows without
interest costs. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent management's
best estimate based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections.
If the expected future cash flow exceeds the carrying value of the asset, no
impairment is recognized. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the
expected future cash flows, an impairment exists and is measured by the excess
of the carrying value over the fair value of the asset. Any impairment
provisions recognized are permanent and may not be restored in the future.
Impairment expense of $2,800 was recognized in 1998, and is included as a
component of business restructuring, integration and other charges in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS

Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective interest method over
the term of the debt agreements. The related amortization is included as a
component of interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. Debt issuance costs included in other assets were $34,100 and
$43,500 at December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively. Amortization of debt
issuance costs amounted to $1,252, $1,918 and $4,721 in 1996, 1997 and 1998,
respectively.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes revenue in the period the service is provided or the
goods are shipped for equipment product sales. Unbilled revenue included in
accounts receivable represent revenues earned for telecommunications services
which will be billed in the succeeding month and totaled $10,981 and $29,920 as
of December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively. The Company invoices customers one
month in advance for recurring services resulting in advance billings at
December 31, 1997 and 1998 of $7,251 and $13,888, respectively.

A portion of the Company's revenues are also related to the sale and
installation of telecommunications equipment and services and maintenance after
the sale. For these systems installations, which usually require three to five
months, the Company uses the percentage-of-completion method, measured by costs
incurred versus total estimated cost at completion. The Company bills certain
equipment rentals, local telephone access service, and maintenance contracts in
advance. The deferred revenue is relieved when the revenue is earned. Systems
equipment sales are recognized at time of shipment.

F-7
<PAGE> 63
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

INCOME TAXES

The Company has applied the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an asset and
liability approach in accounting for income taxes for all years presented.
Deferred income taxes are provided for in the consolidated financial statements
and principally relate to net operating losses and basis differences for
intangible assets and telecommunications equipment. Valuation allowances are
established to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be
realized.

LOSS PER SHARE

The Company has applied the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128), which establishes standards
for computing and presenting earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is
computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The calculation of
diluted earnings per share includes the effect of dilutive common stock
equivalents. No dilutive common stock equivalents existed in any year presented.

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

The Company's financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of
credit risk, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 105,
Disclosure of Information About Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet
Risk and Financial Instruments with Concentrations of Credit Risk, are primarily
cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.

The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with
high-quality institutions. As of December 31, 1998, cash equivalents totaling
approximately $372,000 were held by one financial institution. Such amounts were
collateralized by government-backed securities.

Accounts receivable are due from residential and commercial
telecommunications customers. Credit is extended based on evaluation of the
customer's financial condition and generally collateral is not required.
Anticipated credit losses are provided for in the consolidated financial
statements and have been within management's expectations.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance
with APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related
Interpretations, because the Company believes the alternative fair value
accounting provided under Statement of Financial Accounting No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), requires the use of option valuation
models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options.
Accordingly, in cases where exercise prices equal or exceed fair market value,
the Company recognizes no compensation expense for the stock option grants. In
cases where exercise prices are less than fair value, compensation is recognized
over the period of performance or the vesting period.

The Company accounts for non-employee stock-based compensation in
accordance with SFAS 123. Pro forma financial information, assuming that the
Company had adopted the measurement standards of SFAS 123 for all stock-based
compensation, is included in Note 10.

F-8
<PAGE> 64
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

STOCK SPLIT

All share and per share information presented herein, and in the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements, has been retroactively restated to reflect a
two-for-one stock split of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
("Common Stock"), which occurred on June 15, 1998. The stock split was paid in
the form of a stock dividend to holders of record on June 1, 1998.

SEGMENT REPORTING

In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131). SFAS 131 uses a management
approach to report financial and descriptive information about a Company's
operating segments. Operating segments are revenue-producing components of the
enterprise for which separate financial information is produced internally for
the Company's management. Under this definition, the Company operated, for all
periods presented, as a single segment.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

In June 1997, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS 130). SFAS 130 requires that total
comprehensive income and comprehensive income per share be disclosed with equal
prominence as net income and earnings per share. Comprehensive income is defined
as changes in stockholders' equity exclusive of transactions with owners such as
capital contributions and dividends. The Company adopted this Standard in 1998.
The Company did not report any comprehensive income items in any of the years
presented.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The Company
expects to adopt the new Statement effective January 1, 2000. The Statement will
require the recognition of all derivatives on the Company's consolidated balance
sheet at fair value. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this
Statement will have a significant effect on its results of operations or
financial position.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform with
the 1998 presentation.

2. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

During June 1996, the Company acquired the Telecommunications Division of
EMI Communications Corporation (EMI) in exchange for 937,500 shares of the
Company's common stock, valued at approximately $16,900. The acquisition was
accounted for by the purchase method of accounting, with the purchase price
allocated to the fair values of assets acquired, principally telecommunications
equipment. The operating results of EMI are included in the Company's
consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

During December 1996, the Company acquired, in two separate transactions,
certain assets and the related businesses of Universal Telcom, Inc. (UTT) and
Netsolve, Inc. (Netsolve). The purchase price for UTT included 31,380 shares of
the Company's common stock, valued at $900, and the assumption of approximately
$2,000 of UTT's liabilities. NetSolve was purchased for cash of $12,800. The
acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting, with the
purchase price allocated to the fair value of assets acquired, principally
goodwill. In total, the Company recorded goodwill of approximately $3,000 and
$12,200 related to the acquisitions of UTT and Netsolve, which is being
amortized over an eight year period.
F-9
<PAGE> 65
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

During July 1997, the Company acquired DIGEX, Incorporated (DIGEX), a
leading nationwide business Internet services provider. Aggregate cash
consideration for the acquisition was approximately $160,000. In addition, the
Company issued options and warrants for 1,177,837 shares of Common Stock valued
at $19,380, which was included as a component of the purchase price, to replace
outstanding DIGEX options. The acquisition was accounted for by the purchase
method of accounting, with the purchase price allocated to the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The purchase price allocation was as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Purchase price.............................................. $179,873
Less:
Estimated fair value of DIGEX net assets acquired less
assumed liabilities.................................... 6,450
--------
Excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets
acquired.................................................. $173,423
========
</TABLE>

The allocation of purchase price to goodwill and identifiable intangibles
and estimated lives are:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VALUE AMORTIZATION
ALLOCATED PERIOD IN YEARS
--------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Developed technology........................................ $ 8,000 5
Workforce................................................... 5,000 10
Tradename................................................... 11,000 10
Customer list............................................... 13,000 10
In-process R&D.............................................. 60,000 --
Goodwill.................................................... 76,423 10
</TABLE>

The amount allocated to in-process R&D ($60,000) was recorded as a one-time
charge to operations in 1997 because the technology was not fully developed and
had no future alternative use.

The acquired in-process R&D represents the development of technologies
associated with creating significant infrastructure and high bandwidth
connections so that the Company can offer a range of advanced Internet services.
A brief description of the three categories of in-process R&D projects is
presented below:

R&D Related to Next Generation Routers. These R&D projects are
related to the development of technology embedded in various components of
the network's connection points, primarily routers, to support greater
transmission capacity. These projects were valued at approximately $36,000.
These proprietary projects include the development of VIP2/40 based
technology, CT3 technology, and the realization of a new routing
architecture design for national deployment. As of the transaction date,
the Company believed that the overall project was approximately 90%
complete. At the date of acquisition, the expected costs to complete the
project were approximately $200 in 1997 and $1,300 in 1998.

R&D Related to Next Generation Web Management Services. These R&D
projects are related to the development of DIGEX's next generation of web
management services, and were valued at approximately $12,000. As of the
transaction date, the Company believed that the overall project was
approximately 75% complete. At the date of acquisition, the expected costs
to complete the project were approximately $100 in 1997 and $400 in 1998.

Multicasting. These R&D projects are related to the development of
multicasting services, and were valued at approximately $12,000. As of the
transaction date, the Company believed that the overall project was
approximately 70% complete. At the date of acquisition, the expected costs
to complete the project were approximately $100 in 1997 and $400 in 1998.

F-10
<PAGE> 66
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

The components of developed technologies acquired in the DIGEX acquisition
were (i) router technologies within the existing network infrastructure and (ii)
web management technologies. The developed technologies were designed to provide
basic Internet services and did not have the capability to provide the
sophisticated, value-added services required by high-end corporate users. The
developed technologies were characterized by inherent weaknesses which made them
unable to support future growth requirements and continuously expanding customer
operations. The following points further expand upon the nature of the developed
technology.

Web Management. The developed technology acquired in this category
was related only to the group of servers hosting customers' websites
located at DIGEX's Beltsville headquarters. This site was inadequate to
service the increasing number of sites under management by the Company. The
current software used in the Beltsville headquarters at the time of
acquisition had limited functionality and required the integration of more
sophisticated tools to handle complex network management activities. The
in-process R&D was considered to be a significant step forward since it
involved the development, construction, and integration of an additional
Web site management facility and a back-up operations center on the West
coast. This technologically advanced web site management facility will
incorporate new software arising from DIGEX's joint development efforts
with Microsoft Corporation. Additionally, this facility will incorporate
the next generation routers. These advancements will ultimately result in
faster and easier installation of customers and efficient traffic
management with significantly less overhead.

Multicasting Services. Multicasting services enable a user to send a
transmission to multiple recipients at the same time. The technology
involved avoids the redundancy of sending separate packets to each
recipient, which results in the use of less bandwidth. The developed
technology was unable to handle multicasting.

While material progress has been made on these projects, significant risk
still is associated with their completion. If these projects are unsuccessful,
their expected contribution to revenues and profits will not materialize.

On November 20, 1997, the Company, through Moonlight Acquisition Corp., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the company, entered into a definitive merger
agreement with Shared. The total purchase price for Shared was approximately
$782,151 including $62,300 of certain transaction expenses and fees relating to
certain agreements. The Company initially purchased 1,100,000 shares, or 6% of
Shared for $16,300 on November 20, 1997. The initial investment was recorded
using the cost method.

On December 30, 1997, an additional 4,000,000 shares were purchased for
$60,000, increasing the Company's ownership percentage to 28%. Accordingly,
accounting for the investment was changed to the equity method. At December 31,
1997, the Company's investment in Shared also includes $62,800 for convertible
preferred stock of Shared; $175,000 for Senior Subordinated Discount Notes of
Shared; a warrant valued at $1,455 redeemable for 100,000 shares of common stock
of Shared issued as compensation for consulting services related to the
acquisition and advances of $88,000 used by Shared to retire previously
outstanding Special Preferred Stock and pay certain fees related to termination
of a previous merger agreement.

On March 10, 1998, the Company completed its acquisition of Shared
Technologies Fairchild, Inc. (Shared), a shared tenant communications services
provider. The operating results of Shared are included in the Company's
consolidated financial statements commencing on January 1, 1998. Imputed
interest of $5,130 was recorded based on the cash consideration paid after the
effective date of the acquisition in the first quarter of 1998 and the cost for
Shared was reduced accordingly. Aggregate consideration for the acquisition was
approximately $589,800 in cash, plus the retirement of $175,600 in Shared's
long-term debt, and acquisition

F-11
<PAGE> 67
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

related expenses of $16,700. The acquisition was accounted for by the purchase
method of accounting, with the purchase price allocated to the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, principally goodwill.

The purchase price allocation was as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Purchase price.............................................. $782,151
Less:
Interest expense adjustment............................... 5,130
Estimated fair value of Shared net assets acquired less
assumed liabilities.................................... 51,245
--------
Excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets
acquired............................................... $725,776
========
</TABLE>

The allocation of purchase price to goodwill and identifiable intangibles
and estimated lives are:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VALUE AMORTIZATION
ALLOCATED PERIOD IN YEARS
--------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Developed technology........................................ $100,000 10
Tradename................................................... 10,000 2
In-process R&D.............................................. 63,000 --
Goodwill.................................................... 501,776 20
Customer lists.............................................. 48,000 10
Work force.................................................. 3,000 10
</TABLE>

The amount allocated to in-process R&D ($63,000) was recorded as a one-time
charge to operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
because the technology was not fully developed and had no future alternative
use. The developed technology was comprised of an intelligent infrastructure
which integrated a host of telecommunications systems, including infrastructure
(network hardware and software), service provider networks, and inter-building
communications networks. The acquired in-process R&D represents the development
of technologies associated with creating infrastructure and the associated
systems so that the Company can offer a wide range of data telecommunications
services. These proprietary projects include the development of a multi-service
access platform ("MSAP"). The MSAP will enable the client provisioning of
multiple data services as well as the realization of Shared's existing voice
services. A brief description of the three categories of in-process R&D projects
is presented below:

Access Technology Development. These R&D projects are related to the
development of access technology, including copper connectivity and
deployment, DSL technology development and development of T-1 interfaces.
These projects were valued at approximately $47,000. As of the transaction
date, the Company believed that the overall project was approximately 80%
complete. At the date of acquisition, the expected costs to complete the
project were approximately $800 in 1998 and $1,000 in 1999.

R&D Related to Networking and Networking Management. These R&D
projects are related to the development of systems related to networking
management, and were valued at approximately $15,000. As of the transaction
date, the Company believed that the overall project was approximately 70%
complete. At the date of acquisition, the expected costs to complete the
project were approximately $300 in 1998 and $300 in 1999.

Advanced Networking. These R&D projects are related to the
development of advanced networking functions, and were valued at
approximately $1,000. As of the transaction date, the Company believed that
the overall project was approximately 25% complete. At the date of
acquisition, the expected costs to complete the project were approximately
$100 in 1998 and $100 in 1999.

F-12
<PAGE> 68
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

The distinction between developed technology and acquired in-process R&D is
basically the difference between legacy voice technologies and the emerging data
technologies that are required by Intermedia's high-end corporate users; these
are very different technologies from a telecommunications perspective. The
completion of the in-process R&D will enable Shared to provide new data services
(asynchronous transfer mode, frame relay, Internet, and others) through Shared's
existing architecture. Prior to the acquisition, Shared's services portfolio did
not include data products. Historically, Shared could provide its customer base
with local and long distance voice services and customer premise equipment
products. However, Shared lost data revenue opportunities to its competitors.

The amortization period for the customer lists was determined based on
historical customer data, including customer retention and average sales per
customer. The basis for the life assigned to assembled workforce was annual
turnover rates.

Summarized financial information of Shared for 1997 was as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1997
-----------------
<S> <C>
Financial Position:
Current assets.............................................. $ 43,117
Property and equipment (net)................................ 65,402
Intangible assets........................................... 248,790
Other assets................................................ 8,887
--------
Total assets................................................ $366,196
========
Current liabilities......................................... $222,765
Long-term obligations....................................... 143,207
Redeemable preferred stock and warrants..................... 26,130
Shareholders' deficit....................................... (25,906)
--------
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit................. $366,196
========
Results of Operations:
Revenue..................................................... $181,827
Cost of revenue and other expenses.......................... 281,337
--------
Net income (loss)........................................... $(99,510)
========
</TABLE>

On March 31, 1998, the Company acquired the Long Distance Savers group of
companies (collectively, LDS, a regional interexchange carrier. The operating
results of LDS are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements
commencing on April 1, 1998. Aggregate consideration for the acquisition was
approximately $15,700 in cash, plus 5,359,748 shares of the Company's Common
Stock valued at approximately $137,176, the retirement of $15,100 of LDS's
long-term debt, and acquisition related expenses of $2,400. The acquisition was
accounted for by the purchase method of accounting, with the purchase price to
be allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed,
principally goodwill ($143,100). This goodwill is being amortized over its
estimated useful life of 20 years.

On April 30, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of privately held
National Telecommunications of Florida, Inc. and NTC, Inc. (collectively,
National), an emerging switch-based competitive local exchange carrier and
established interexchange carrier. The operating results of National are
included in the Company's consolidated financial statements commencing on April
1, 1998. Aggregate

F-13
<PAGE> 69
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

consideration for the acquisition was approximately $59,500 in cash, plus
2,909,796 shares of the Company's Common Stock, valued at approximately $88,749,
the retirement of $2,800 in National's long-term debt, and $2,200 in acquisition
related costs. The acquisition was accounted for by the purchase method of
accounting, with the purchase price allocated to the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, principally goodwill ($146,700). This goodwill
is being amortized over its estimated useful life of 20 years.

The 20 year amortization period assigned to the goodwill arising from the
Company's acquisitions of Shared, LDS and National is based on the Company's
analysis of their businesses. The Company considered the general stability of
these companies (i.e. the length of time that these three entities have already
successfully conducted business operations) particularly during periods of
increasing competition and technological developments. These companies have been
in operations approximately 13, 8 and 16 years, respectively. The Company also
considered the nature of their principal products and the anticipated effects of
changes in future business demand for their services, due to, among other
things, technological change and competition. The products and services offered
by these entities are mature and have a long life expectancy. The Company
believes the useful life of the associated goodwill will not be adversely
affected by future competition and technological developments and that a life of
20 years is appropriate. On the other hand, DIGEX, which was acquired by the
Company in 1997, operates in an emerging Internet based marketplace and its
predominant product offerings have been developed principally in the last 3-4
years and are subject to more rapid change. Consequently, a 10 year life was
assigned to the goodwill arising from the acquisition of DIGEX.

The following unaudited pro forma results of operations present the
consolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions discussed above had
occurred at the beginning of the respective periods. These pro forma results do
not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if
the acquisition had been made as of these dates or of results which may occur in
the future.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31 (UNAUDITED),
------------------------
1997 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues.................................................... $ 567,278 $ 760,692
Loss before extraordinary item.............................. (361,093) (478,237)
Loss attributable to common stockholders.................... (429,211) (568,581)
Basic and diluted loss per common share..................... (9.60) (12.25)
</TABLE>

3. BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING AND INTEGRATION PROGRAM

During the second quarter of 1998, management committed to and commenced
implementation of the restructuring program (the Program) which was designed to
streamline and refocus the Company's operations and facilitate the
transformation of the Company's five separate operating companies into one an
Integrated Communications Provider. The significant activities included in the
Program include (i) consolidation, rationalization and integration of network
facilities, collocations, network management and network facility procurement;
(ii) consolidation and integration of the sales forces of the Company and its
recent acquisitions, including the integration of the Company's products and
services and the elimination of redundant headcount and related costs; (iii)
centralization of accounting and financial functions, including the elimination
of redundant headcount and related costs; (iv) development and integration of
information systems including the integration of multiple billing systems and
the introduction and deployment of automated sales force and workflow management
tools; (v) consolidation of office space and the elimination of unnecessary
legal entities; and (vi) exiting non-strategic businesses including the
elimination of headcount and related costs. The anticipated completion date of
the Program is December 31, 1999.

F-14
<PAGE> 70
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

The following table sets forth the significant components and activity in
the restructuring program reserve for the year ended December 31, 1998:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EMPLOYEE OTHER
TERMINATION BUSINESS
BENEFITS CONTRACT ASSET INTEGRATION
ACTIVITY (VII) TERMINATIONS IMPAIRMENTS COSTS TOTAL
- -------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Network integration(i)............. $ -- $ 900 $ -- $ -- $ 900
Sales force consolidation and
branding(ii)..................... 400 -- -- -- 400
Consolidation of financial
functions(iii)................... 900 -- -- -- 900
Information systems
integration(iv).................. 700 -- -- -- 700
Campus consolidation(v)............ 2,300 -- -- 2,300
Exiting non-core businesses(vi).... 600 11,500 13,400 1,600 27,100
------ ------- ------- ------ -------
Total provisions recorded during
the Quarter ended June 30,
1998............................. 2,600 14,700 13,400 1,600 32,300
Payments and other adjustments..... 1,400 11,700 13,300 400 26,800
------ ------- ------- ------ -------
Balance in accrual at December 31,
1998............................. $1,200 $ 3,000 $ 100 $1,200 $ 5,500
====== ======= ======= ====== =======
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(i) This activity consists primarily of the consolidation, rationalization and
integration of network facilities, collocations, network management and
network facility procurement. Contract terminations represent the estimated
costs of terminating two contracts with MCI Communications Corporation.

(ii) This activity consists primarily of the consolidation and integration of
the sales forces of the Company and its recent acquisitions, including the
integration of the Company's products and services and the elimination of
redundant headcount and related costs.

(iii)This activity consists of the centralization of accounting and financial
functions, including the reduction of redundant headcount and related
costs.

(iv) This activity consists of the development and integration of information
systems, including the integration of multiple billing systems and the
introduction and deployment of automated sales force and workflow
management tools. The only costs included in this category in the table
above relate to the termination of certain employees as described in (vii)
below.

(v) This activity relates to the consolidation of office space. Contract
termination costs represent the estimated costs of lease terminations for
property exited as part of the Program.

(vi) This activity consists of the exiting of non-strategic businesses including
the elimination of redundant headcount and related costs. Contract
termination costs include the estimated cost to cancel a switched services
contract with WorldCom, Inc. (WorldCom) ($10,100) and lease termination
payments. On September 30, 1998, the Company amended its agreement with
WorldCom to provide the Company with an option for an earlier termination
date and lower monthly minimum usage amounts. On October 27, 1998, the
Company exercised its option, and, in connection therewith, paid $3,300 to
WorldCom. As a result, restructuring charges were reduced by $10,100 during
the third quarter of 1998. The option payment of $3,300 was recorded in
October 1998 as a deferred charge and is being amortized into operations
over the remaining period of the contract. Asset impairments relate to
$9,200 of accounts receivable balances from four customers that were
reserved as a result of the Company's exit of the wholesale long-distance
business. However, no such determination has been made to date. In
addition, this category also includes $2,800 related to equipment
write-downs. The impaired assets consist of terminal servers with an
estimated fair value of $400 as of June 30, 1998. The fair value estimate
was

F-15
<PAGE> 71
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

based on the Company's review of the historical operations and cash flows
of the related Internet business that such assets support. The impairment
loss of $2,800 was recognized in connection with the Company's decision to
outsource these services and to dispose of these assets. The remaining
life of the assets of six months correlates to the time required to
migrate the business to the third party provider. The revenue generated
from operations that the Company has exited amounted to $17.0 for the
period during the year ended December 31, 1998 that such business was
operated.

(vii) The total number of employees affected by the restructuring program was
280. The terminated employees were notified that their termination was
involuntary and of their associated benefit arrangements, prior to the
date of the financial statements.

As provided for in the Program, the Company also expensed other business
restructuring and integration costs that were incurred during 1998. These costs
represent incremental, redundant, or convergence costs that resulted directly
from implementation of the Program, but that are required to be expensed as
incurred.

The following table summarizes total Program costs and sets forth the
components of all business restructuring and integration costs that were
expensed as incurred during 1998:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1998
------------
<S> <C>
Business restructuring charges (as discussed above)......... $ 18,800
Integration costs
Network integration(A).................................... 23,353
Department and employee realignment(B).................... 2,200
Functional re-engineering(C).............................. 1,800
Other(D).................................................. 7,300
--------
Total............................................. $ 53,453
========
</TABLE>

- ---------------
(A) Consists primarily of redundant network expense, with some employee salary
costs of severed employees through their severance date.
(B) Consists of branding, training and relocation expenses.
(C) Consists of consultant costs and some employee salary costs.
(D) Consists of losses on divested businesses, employee salary costs, legal,
accounting and consulting costs and facilities integration.

4. TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT

Telecommunications equipment consisted of:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------
1997 1998
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Telecommunications equipment................................ $307,923 $ 778,275
Fiber optic cable........................................... 59,643 529,656
Furniture and fixtures...................................... 52,292 150,313
Leasehold improvements...................................... 10,113 24,989
Construction in progress.................................... 115,409 124,404
-------- ----------
545,380 1,607,637
Less accumulated depreciation............................... (81,534) (236,054)
-------- ----------
$463,846 $1,371,583
======== ==========
</TABLE>

F-16
<PAGE> 72
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

Depreciation expense totaled $15,454, $43,960 and $155,711 in 1996, 1997,
and 1998, respectively.

Telecommunications equipment and construction in progress included $27,287
and $562,207 of equipment recorded under capitalized lease arrangements at
December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively. Accumulated amortization of assets
recorded under capital leases amounts to $4,277 and 56,053 at December 31, 1997
and 1998, respectively.

During the year, the Company entered into two agreements to purchase
capacity from other telecommunications companies. The agreements allow the
Company to utilize the purchased capacity for a 20 year period. Total initial
payments related to these agreements were $7,600 during 1998. In addition, the
Company will be required to make an additional payment of $2,100 in 1999 upon
the completion of the underlying network related to one of these agreements.

5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------
1997 1998
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Goodwill.................................................... $133,731 $ 929,334
Customer lists.............................................. 10,376 58,172
Tradename................................................... -- 10,000
Developed technology........................................ 8,000 110,165
Workforce................................................... -- 3,000
-------- ----------
152,107 1,110,671
Less accumulated amortization............................... (14,079) (88,115)
-------- ----------
$138,028 $1,022,556
======== ==========
</TABLE>

Amortization of intangible assets amounted to $3,123 in 1996, $9,653 in
1997 and $74,036 in 1998.

6. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1997 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
12.5% Senior Discount Notes................................. $ 219,260 $ 247,524
11.25% Senior Discount Notes................................ 394,325 440,069
8.875% Senior Notes......................................... 260,250 260,250
8.5% Senior Notes........................................... 350,000 400,000
8.6% Senior Notes........................................... -- 500,000
Other notes payable......................................... 1,221 676
---------- ----------
1,225,056 1,848,519
Less current portion........................................ (601) (661)
---------- ----------
$1,224,455 $1,847,858
========== ==========
</TABLE>

During June 1995, Intermedia issued $160,000 principal amount of 13.5%
Senior Notes due 2005 (13.5% Senior Notes) and warrants to purchase 700,800
shares of the Company's Common Stock at $5.43 per share. The Company allocated
$1,051 of the proceeds to the warrants, representing the estimated fair value at
the date of issuance. During 1997, the Company used a portion of the proceeds of
the 11.25% Senior Discount Notes, described below, to retire the 13.5% Senior
Notes. This retirement resulted in an extraordinary loss, as shown in the
accompanying 1997 consolidated statement of operations, of approximately
$43,834.

F-17
<PAGE> 73
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

During May 1996, the Company issued $330,000 principal amount of 12.5%
Senior Discount Notes, due May 15, 2006 (the 12.5% Senior Discount Notes). The
original issue discounted price for each $1,000 face value 12.5% Senior Discount
Note was $545. Net proceeds to the Company amounted to approximately $171,000.
The original issue discount is being amortized over the term of the 12.5% Senior
Discount Notes using the effective interest method. Commencing on November 15,
2001, cash interest on the 12.5% Senior Discount Notes will be payable
semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 at a rate of 12.5% per annum.
The 12.5% Senior Discount Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company
after May 15, 2001, at a premium declining to par in 2004 and are on a parity
with all other senior indebtedness.

On July 9, 1997, the Company sold $606,000 principal amount at maturity of
11.25% Senior Discount Notes due 2007 (11.25% Senior Discount Notes) in a
private placement transaction. Subsequent thereto, the over-allotment option
with respect to the 11.25% Senior Discount Notes was exercised and the Company
sold an additional $43,000 principal amount at maturity of 11.25% Senior
Discount Notes. The issue price of the 11.25% Senior Discount Notes was $577.48
per $1000 principal amount at maturity of the 11.25% Senior Discount Notes. Net
proceeds to the Company amounted to approximately $363,000. The original issue
discount is being amortized over the term of the 11.25% Senior Discount Notes
using the effective interest method. Cash interest will not accrue on the 11.25%
Senior Discount Notes prior to July 15, 2002. Commencing January 15, 2003, cash
interest on the 11.25% Senior Discount Notes will be payable semi-annually in
arrears on July 15 and January 15 at a rate of 11.25% per annum. The 11.25%
Senior Discount Notes will be redeemable, at the Company's option at any time on
or after July 15, 2002 and are on a parity with all other senior indebtedness.

On October 30, 1997, the Company sold $250,000 principal amount of 8.875%
Senior Notes due 2007 (8.875% Senior Notes) in a private placement transaction.
Subsequent thereto, the over-allotment option with respect to the 8.875% Notes
was exercised and the Company sold an additional $10,250 principal amount at
maturity of 8.875% Notes. Net proceeds to the Company amounted to approximately
$253,000. Cash interest on the 8.875% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in
arrears on May 1 and November 1 at a rate of 8.875% per annum. The 8.875% Senior
Notes will be redeemable, at the Company's option at any time on or after
November 1, 2002 and are on a parity with all other senior indebtedness.

On December 23, 1997, the Company sold $350,000 principal amount of 8.5%
Senior Notes due 2008 (8.5% Senior Notes) in a private placement transaction.
Subsequent to December 31, 1997, the over-allotment option with respect to the
8.5% Senior Notes was exercised and the Company sold an additional $50,000
principal amount at maturity of 8.5% Senior Notes. Net proceeds to the Company
amounted to approximately $390,000. Cash interest on the 8.5% Senior Notes is
payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15. The 8.5% Senior
Notes, which mature on January 15, 2008, will be redeemable at the option of the
Company at any time on or after January 15, 2003 and are on a parity with all
other senior indebtedness.

On May 27, 1998, the Company sold $450,000 principal amount of 8.6% Senior
Notes due 2008 (8.6% Senior Notes) in a private placement transaction.
Subsequent thereto, the over-allotment option with respect to the 8.6% Senior
Notes was exercised and the Company sold an additional $50,000 principal amount
at maturity of 8.6% Senior Notes. Net proceeds to the Company amounted to
approximately $488,900. Cash interest on the 8.6% Senior Notes is payable
semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1. The 8.6% Senior Notes, which
mature on June 1, 2008, will be redeemable at the option of the Company at any
time on or after June 1, 2003 and are on a parity with all other senior
indebtedness.

F-18
<PAGE> 74
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

Long-term debt maturities as of December 31, 1998 for the next five years
are as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1999........................................................ $ 661
2000........................................................ 15
2001........................................................ --
2002........................................................ --
2003........................................................ --
Thereafter.................................................. 1,847,843
----------
$1,848,519
==========
</TABLE>

7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's financial instruments
at December 31 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1998
--------------------- ---------------------
CARRYING CARRYING
AMOUNT FAIR VALUE AMOUNT FAIR VALUE
-------- ---------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................... $756,923 $755,410 $387,615 $387,638
Restricted investments, current and non-current..... 6,853 6,853 7,930 7,930
Accounts receivable................................. 58,579 58,579 178,519 178,519
Liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................... 53,630 53,630 102,905 102,905
Long-term debt:
12.5% Senior Discount Notes...................... 219,260 259,050 247,524 258,225
11.25% Senior Discount Notes..................... 394,325 462,413 440,069 441,320
8.875% Senior Notes.............................. 260,250 266,756 260,250 251,141
8.5% Senior Notes................................ 350,000 350,000 400,000 378,000
8.6% Senior Notes................................ -- -- 500,000 475,000
Other notes payable.............................. 1,221 1,221 676 676
Series B redeemable exchangeable preferred
stock.......................................... 323,146 409,665 371,678 384,573
Series D junior convertible preferred stock...... 169,722 282,486 133,686 143,442
Series E junior convertible preferred stock...... 196,008 225,040 160,086 126,539
Series F junior convertible preferred stock...... -- -- 196,838 132,000
</TABLE>

The following methods and assumptions are used in estimating fair values
for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The fair value of cash equivalents is
based on negotiated trades for the securities.

Investments: These investments are classified as held-to-maturity, in
accordance with SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities. At December 31, 1998, the fair value of these
investments approximates their carrying amounts.

Accounts receivable and accounts payable: The carrying amounts
reported in the consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable and
accounts payable approximate their fair value.

Long-term and short-term debt: The estimated fair value of the
Company's borrowing is based on negotiated trades for the securities as
provided by the Company's investment banker or by using discounted cash
flows at the Company's incremental borrowing rate.

F-19
<PAGE> 75
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss
per common share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1996 1997 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Numerator:
Loss before extraordinary item........................ $ (57,199) $ (197,289) $ (487,229)
Extraordinary item.................................... (43,834) --
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss.............................................. (57,199) (241,123) (487,229)
Preferred stock dividends and accretions.............. -- (43,742) (90,344)
----------- ----------- -----------
Numerator for basic loss per share -- loss
attributable to common stockholders................ (57,199) (284,865) (577,573)
Effect of dilutive securities......................... -- -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
Numerator for diluted loss per share -- income
attributable to common stockholders after assumed
conversions........................................ $ (57,199) $ (284,865) $ (577,573)
=========== =========== ===========
Denominator:
Denominator for basic loss per
share -- weighted-average shares................... 28,035,194 33,340,180 43,645,067
Effect of dilutive securities......................... -- -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
Denominator for diluted loss per share -- adjusted
weighted-average shares and assumed conversions.... 28,035,194 33,340,180 43,645,067
=========== =========== ===========
Basic loss per common share............................. $ (2.04) $ (8.54) $ (13.23)
=========== =========== ===========
Diluted loss per common share........................... $ (2.04) $ (8.54) $ (13.23)
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

Unexercised options to purchase 4,353,342, 7,066,262 and 7,553,690 shares
of Common Stock for 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, and unexercised
convertible preferred stock outstanding convertible into 7,741,872 and
17,076,495 shares of Common Stock for 1997 and 1998, respectively, were not
included in the computations of diluted loss per share because assumed
conversion would be antidilutive.

9. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

On March 7, 1997, the Company sold 30,000 shares (aggregate liquidation
preference $300,000) of its Series A Redeemable Exchangeable Preferred Stock due
2009 (Series A Preferred Stock) in a private placement transaction. Net proceeds
to the Company amounted to approximately $288,000. On June 6, 1997, the Company
issued 300,000 shares (aggregate liquidation preference $300,000) of its 13.5%
Series B Redeemable Exchangeable Preferred Stock due 2009 (Series B Preferred
Stock) in exchange for all outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock
pursuant to a registered exchange offer. Dividends on the Series B Preferred
Stock accumulate at a rate of 13.5% of the aggregate liquidation preference
thereof and are payable quarterly, in arrears. Dividends are payable in cash or,
at the Company's option, by the issuance of additional shares of Series B
Preferred Stock having an aggregate liquidation preference equal to the amount
of such dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory
redemption at its liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus accumulated
and unpaid dividends on March 31, 2009. The Series B Preferred Stock will be
redeemable at the option of the Company at any time after March 31, 2002 at
rates commencing with 106.75%, declining to 100% on March 31, 2007.

F-20
<PAGE> 76
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

The Company is accreting the Series B Preferred Stock to its liquidation
preference through the due date of the Series B Preferred Stock. The accretion
for the year ended December 31, 1998 was approximately $1,042.

During 1997 and 1998, the Company issued 3,442 and 4,748 additional shares,
respectively, of Series B Preferred Stock, in lieu of cash, with an aggregate
liquidation preference of $34,414 and $47,479 as payment of the required
quarterly dividends.

On July 9, 1997, the Company sold 6,000,000 Depositary Shares (Series D
Depositary Shares) (aggregate liquidation preference $150,000) each representing
a one-hundredth interest in a share of the Company's 7% Series D Junior
Convertible Preferred Stock (Series D Preferred Stock), in a private placement
transaction. Subsequent thereto, the over-allotment option with respect to the
Series D Depositary Shares was exercised and the Company sold an additional
900,000 Series D Depositary Shares (aggregate liquidation preference of
$22,500). Net proceeds to the Company amounted to approximately $167,000.
Dividends on the Series D Preferred Stock will accumulate at a rate of 7% of the
aggregate liquidation preference thereof and are payable quarterly, in arrears.
Dividends are payable in cash or, at the Company's option, by the issuance of
shares of Common Stock of the Company. The Series D Preferred Stock will be
redeemable at the option of the Company at any time on or after July 19, 2000 at
rates commencing with 104%, declining to 100% on July 19, 2004.

The Series D Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder,
into Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of $19.45 per share of
Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments. Further, in the event of a change
in control, the holder may compel the Company to redeem the Series B Preferred
Stock at a price equal to 100% of liquidation preference or $2,500 per share.

The Company is accreting the Series D Preferred Stock to its liquidation
preference through the due date of the Series D Preferred Stock. The accretion
for the year ended December 31, 1998 was approximately $774.

On October 30, 1997, the Company sold 7,000,000 Depositary Shares (Series E
Depositary Shares) (aggregate liquidation preference $175,000) each representing
a one-hundredth interest in a share of the Company's 7% Series E Junior
Convertible Preferred Stock (Series E Preferred Stock), in a private placement
transaction. Subsequent thereto, the over-allotment option with respect to the
Series E Depositary Shares was exercised and the Company sold an additional
1,000,000 Series E Depositary Shares (aggregate liquidation preference $25,000).
Net proceeds to the Company amounted to approximately $194,000. Dividends on the
Series E Preferred Stock will accumulate at a rate of 7% of the aggregate
liquidation preference thereof and are payable quarterly, in arrears. Dividends
are payable in cash or, at the Company's option, by the issuance of shares of
Common Stock of the Company. The Series E Preferred Stock will be redeemable at
the option of the Company at any time on or after October 18, 2000 at rates
commencing with 104%, declining to 100% on October 18, 2004.

The Series E Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder,
into Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of $30.235 per share of
Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments. Further, in the event of a change
in control, the holder may compel the Company to redeem the Series E Preferred
Stock at a price equal to 100% of liquidation preference or $2,500 per share.

The Company is accreting the Series E Preferred Stock to its liquidation
preference through the due date of the Series E Preferred Stock. The accretion
for the year ended December 31, 1998 was approximately $876.

On August 18, 1998, the Company sold 8,000,000 Depositary Shares (the
Series F Depositary Shares) (aggregate liquidation preference $200,000) each
representing a one-hundredth interest in a share of the Company's 7% Series F
Junior Convertible Preferred Stock (the Series F Preferred Stock), in a private
placement transaction. Net proceeds to the Company amounted to approximately
$193,500. Dividends on the

F-21
<PAGE> 77
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

Series F Preferred Stock accumulate at a rate of 7% of the aggregate liquidation
preference thereof and are payable quarterly, in arrears. Dividends are payable
in cash or, at the Company's option, by issuance of shares of Common Stock of
the Company. The Series F Preferred Stock is redeemable, at the option of the
Company, in whole or part, at any time on or after October 17, 2001, at rates
commencing with 104%, declining to 100% on October 17, 2005.

The Series F Preferred Stock will be convertible, at the option of the
holder, into Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of $42.075 per
share of Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments. Further, in the event of
a change in control, the holder may compel the Company to redeem the Series F
Preferred Stock at a price equal to 100% of liquidation preference or $2,500 per
share.

The Company is accreting the Series F Preferred Stock to its liquidation
preference through the due date of the Series F Preferred Stock. The accretion
for the year ended December 31, 1998 was approximately $344.

During July and August 1998, the Company exchanged (a) approximately
2,029,000 shares of its Common Stock for approximately 1,487,000 Series D
Depositary Shares and (b) approximately 1,423,000 shares of its Common Stock for
approximately 1,511,000 Series E Depositary Shares, pursuant to exchange
agreements with certain holders. In connection with the conversion of shares,
the Company recorded additional preferred stock dividends of approximately
$10,980 during the third quarter of 1998 representing the market value of the
inducement feature of the conversions.

10. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Stock Options: The Company has a 1992 Stock Option Plan and a 1996
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plans) under which options to acquire an aggregate
of 2,692,000 shares and 9,000,000 shares, respectively, of Common Stock may be
granted to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company. The
Plans authorize the Board of Directors (the Board) to issue incentive stock
options (ISOs), as defined in Section 422A(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, and
stock options that do not conform to the requirements of that Code section
(Non-ISOs). The Board has discretionary authority to determine the types of
stock options to be granted, the persons among those eligible to whom options
will be granted, the number of shares to be subject to such options, and the
terms of the stock option agreements. Options may be exercised in the manner and
at such times as fixed by the Board, but may not be exercised after the tenth
anniversary of the grant of such options.

F-22
<PAGE> 78
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

The following table summarizes the transactions for the three years ended
December 31, 1998 relating to the Plans:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF PER SHARE
SHARES OPTION PRICE
---------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, December 31, 1995............................ 2,277,948 $ 3.03 - $ 7.78
Granted................................................. 2,374,366 9.88 - 17.25
Exercised............................................... (163,992) 3.19 - 13.53
Canceled................................................ (134,980) 3.30 - 7.78
----------
Outstanding, December 31, 1996............................ 4,353,342
Granted................................................. 4,771,424 0.26 - 26.63
Exercised............................................... (809,378) 0.26 - 13.53
Canceled................................................ (1,249,126) 0.26 - 12.94
----------
Outstanding, December 31, 1997............................ 7,066,262
Granted................................................. 3,030,810 14.56 - 38.19
Exercised............................................... (1,187,568) 0.26 - 29.00
Canceled................................................ (1,355,814) 0.26 - 38.19
----------
Outstanding, December 31, 1998............................ 7,553,690
==========
Exercisable, December 31, 1998............................ 2,299,011
==========
</TABLE>

The Board of Directors has reserved 854,193 shares of Common Stock for
issuance in connection with stock warrants, and 7,706,184 shares of Common Stock
for issuance to employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company
pursuant to stock options as may be determined by the Board of Directors.

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is
required by SFAS 123, which also requires that the information be determined as
if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent
to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method set forth in SFAS 123. The fair
value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997 1998
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Risk-free interest rate................................... 6.2% 6.1% 5.4%
Volatility factor of the expected market price of the
Company's Common Stock.................................. 53% 58% 53%
Dividend yield............................................ -- -- --
Weighted average expected life of options................. 5 years 5 years 5 years
</TABLE>

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

F-23
<PAGE> 79
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's
pro forma information follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997 1998
-------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pro forma net loss attributable to common
stockholders....................................... $(58,602) $(289,927) $(583,296)
Pro forma loss per common share...................... (2.09) (8.70) (13.37)
</TABLE>

The following table summarizes the weighted average exercise prices of
option activity for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997, 1998.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997 1998
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period.............................. $ 5.38 $ 9.39 $ 9.52
Granted..................................................... 13.50 12.91 26.81
Exercised................................................... 4.26 3.12 7.22
Canceled.................................................... 7.23 5.96 10.48
Balance at end of period.................................... 9.39 9.52 18.78
</TABLE>

As of December 31, 1998, the weighted average exercise price of exercisable
options was $10.77. Outstanding options as of December 31, 1998 had had a
weighted average remaining contractual life of 7.7 years. The per share weighted
average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 1996,
1997 and 1998 were $13.64, $14.25 and $14.84, respectively.

Stock Award Plans: The Company has entered into restricted share
agreements with three executive officers that provide stock award incentives.
Pursuant to the agreements, up to an aggregate of 900,000 restricted shares of
Common Stock have been contingently awarded to the respective officers which
awards become effective upon the attainment of certain stock price milestones
ranging from $10 to $20. The unvested shares also partially vest upon the
achievement of specific financial results and upon the purchase of five percent
or more of the Company's stock by a strategic investor. Shares awarded under
these arrangements vest over a period from five to twenty years following the
award. During 1996, 1997, and 1998, 400,000, 330,000 and 5,000 shares were
awarded with a fair value of $5,000, $4,950 and $98, respectively. These amounts
are being amortized over the vesting periods.

Stock Warrants: At December 31, 1998, warrants to purchase the following
shares of the Company's Common Stock were outstanding:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES PRICE PER SHARE EXPIRATION DATE
------ --------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
654,193............................................. $ 5.43 June 1, 2000
200,000............................................. 20.75 November 11, 2002
</TABLE>

As further discussed in Note 6, the Company issued warrants expiring in
2000 to acquire 700,800 shares of Common Stock in connection with the issuance
of the 13.5% Senior Notes. The Company also has a warrant outstanding that has
been issued for consulting services that will allow the holder to purchase
200,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. Warrants to purchase 167,800
shares of Common Stock were assumed in the acquisition of DIGEX. On January 13,
1998, this warrant was exercised pursuant to a cashless exercise provision for
106,344 shares.

Shareholder Rights Plan: On March 7, 1996, the Board of Directors adopted
a Shareholder Rights Plan and declared a dividend of one common stock Purchase
Right (a Right) for each outstanding share of Common Stock to shareholders of
record on March 18, 1996. Such Rights only become exercisable, or transferable
apart from the Common Stock, ten business days after a person or group (an
Acquiring Person) acquires beneficial ownership of, or commences a tender or
exchange offer for, 15% or more of the Company's Common Stock.

F-24
<PAGE> 80
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

Each Right then may be exercised to acquire 1/1000th of a share of the
Company's Series C preferred stock at an exercise price of $200. Thereafter,
upon the occurrence of certain events, the Rights entitle holders other than the
Acquiring Person to acquire the existing Company's preferred stock or Common
Stock of the surviving company having a value of twice the exercise price of the
Rights.

The Rights may be redeemed by the Company at a redemption price of $.01 per
Right at any time until the 10th business day following public announcement that
a 15% position has been acquired or ten business days after commencement of a
tender or exchange offer.

Authorized Shares: On May 20, 1998, the shareholders of the Company
approved an increase in the number of shares of authorized Common Stock from
50,000,000 to 150,000,000.

11. INCOME TAXES

At December 31, 1997 and 1998, the Company had temporary differences
between amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and
such amounts measured by tax laws. The Company also has net operating loss (NOL)
carryforwards available to offset future taxable income. Significant components
of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 are as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEFERRED TAX
ASSET (LIABILITY)
---------------------
TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES/CARRYFORWARDS 1997 1998
- ----------------------------------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Tax over book depreciation.................................. $ (1,131) $ (9,477)
Intangible assets........................................... (15,260) (18,121)
Other....................................................... -- (463)
--------- ---------
Total deferred tax liabilities.................... (16,391) (28,061)
Net operating loss carryforwards............................ 100,347 273,813
High yield debt obligations................................. 14,753 35,434
Other....................................................... 2,570 15,166
--------- ---------
Total deferred tax assets......................... 117,670 324,413
Less valuation allowance.................................... (101,279) (296,352)
--------- ---------
16,391 28,061
--------- ---------
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities................................ $ -- $ --
========= =========
</TABLE>

At December 31, 1998, the Company's net operating loss carryforward for
federal income tax purposes is approximately $730,000, expiring in various
amounts from 2003 to 2018. Limitations apply to the use of the net operating
loss carryforwards.

RATE RECONCILIATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997 1998
------------------ ------------------ -------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
-------- ------- -------- ------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tax benefit at U.S. statutory
rates.............................. $(19,448) (34.0)% $(81,989) (34.0)% $(165,632) (34.0)%
State income taxes, net of federal
benefit............................ (2,001) (3.5) (8,440) (3.5) (17,050) (3.5)
In-Process R&D....................... -- -- 20,400 8.5 21,403 4.4
Other................................ (315) (0.6) (1,722) (1.2) 10,291 2.1
Change in valuation allowance........ 21,764 38.1 67,157 27.8 150,989 31.0
-------- ----- -------- ----- --------- -----
$ -- --% $ -- --% $ -- --%
======== ===== ======== ===== ========= =====
</TABLE>

F-25
<PAGE> 81
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company has established a 401(k) profit-sharing plan. Employees 21
years or older with at least three months of service are eligible to participate
in the plan. Participants may elect to contribute, on a tax-deferred basis, up
to 15% of their compensation, not to exceed $10 in 1998. The Company will match
one-half of a participant's contribution, up to a maximum of 6% of the
participant's compensation. The Company's matching contribution fully vests
after three years of service. The Company's contributions to the plan were
approximately $77, $735 and $3,823 in 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively.

13. COMMITMENTS

The Company is a party to various other capital lease agreements for fiber
optic cable, underground conduit equipment and utility poles which extend
through the year 2015.

In March 1998, the Company and Williams Communications, Inc. (Williams)
executed a Capacity Purchase Agreement which provides the Company with right to
purchase transmission capacity on a non-cancelable indefeasible right of use
basis on the Williams fiber network for the next 20 years. The agreement covers
approximately 14,000 route miles of network facilities. The capitalized asset,
consisting of the Company's rights to use network facilities, including, but not
limited to, fiber, optronics/electronics, digital encoders, telephone lines and
microwave facilities, in the amount of $455.0 million, is being depreciated over
the 20-year estimated useful life of the primary underlying network asset, the
fiber.

Future minimum lease payments for assets under capital leases (including
the Williams agreement) at December 31, 1998 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1999........................................................ $ 71,658
2000........................................................ 69,608
2001........................................................ 64,028
2002........................................................ 59,425
2003........................................................ 59,578
Thereafter.................................................. 797,661
----------
1,121,958
Less amount representing interest........................... (598,091)
----------
Present value of future minimum lease payments.............. 523,867
Less current portion........................................ (21,219)
----------
$ 502,648
==========
</TABLE>

Certain executory costs, principally maintenance, associated with capital
leases are being expensed as incurred.

The Company also leases fiber optic cable, terminal facility space, and
office space under operating lease arrangements. The leases generally contain
renewal options which range from one year to fifteen years, with certain
rights-of-way and cable conduit space being renewable indefinitely after the
minimum lease term subject to cancellation notice by either party to the lease.
Lease payments in some cases may be adjusted for related revenues, increases in
property taxes, operating costs of the lessor, and increases in the Consumer
Price Index. Operating lease expense was $4,795, $9,857 and $36,273 for 1996,
1997 and 1998, respectively.

F-26
<PAGE> 82
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases with
original terms of more than one year as of December 31, 1998 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIBER TERMINAL
OPTIC FACILITY OFFICE
CABLE SPACE SPACE TOTAL
------ -------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999.............................................. $ 510 $11,976 $16,999 $ 29,485
2000.............................................. 475 12,452 16,531 29,458
2001.............................................. 475 11,398 12,271 24,144
2002.............................................. 475 9,994 10,308 20,777
2003.............................................. 475 9,137 8,886 18,498
Thereafter........................................ 396 21,953 28,719 51,068
------ ------- ------- --------
$2,806 $76,910 $93,714 $173,430
====== ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>

14. CONTINGENCIES

On June 20, 1997, two purported class action complaints were filed in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County
respectively by TAAM Associates, Inc. and David and Chaile Steinberg (the
Complaints), purported stockholders of DIGEX on behalf of all non-affiliated
common stockholders of DIGEX against Intermedia, DIGEX and the directors of
DIGEX (the DIGEX Directors). The Complaints allege that the DIGEX Directors
violated their fiduciary duties to the public stockholders of DIGEX by agreeing
to vote in favor of the merger between DIGEX and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Intermedia (the Merger) and that Intermedia knowingly aided and abetted such
violation by offering to retain DIGEX management in their present positions and
consenting to stock option grants to certain executive officers of DIGEX. The
Complaints sought a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the Merger
but no applications were made for such injunctions prior to consummation of the
Merger on July 11, 1997. In addition, the Complaints seek cash damages from the
DIGEX Directors. In August 1997, a motion to dismiss the Complaints was filed on
behalf of Intermedia, DIGEX, and the DIGEX Directors. A motion to dismiss for
failure to prosecute was filed in February 1999.

These cases are in the early stages and no assurance can be given as to
their ultimate outcome. Intermedia, after consultation with its counsel,
believes that there are meritorious factual and legal defenses to the claims in
the Complaints. Intermedia intends to defend vigorously the claims in the
Complaints.

The Company is not a party to any other pending legal proceedings except
for various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. The
Company does not believe that these normal course of business claims or lawsuits
will have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.

The Company maintains interconnection agreements with incumbent local
exchange carriers (ILECs) in certain states. These contracts govern the
reciprocal amounts to be billed by competitive carriers for terminating local
traffic including local traffic Internet service providers (ISPs). During 1997,
the Company recognized revenue from these ILECs of approximately $10.1 million
for these services. During 1998, the Company recognized an additional $35.9
million in revenue from these services. A dispute has arisen over the reciprocal
compensation provisions of these interconnection agreements with most ILECs
arguing that they are not obligated to pay competitive carriers, including the
Company, for local calls made to ISPs. The Company accounts for reciprocal
compensation with the ILECs, including the activity associated with the disputed
ISP traffic, as local traffic pursuant to the terms of its interconnection
agreements. Accordingly, revenue is recognized in the period that the traffic is
terminated. The circumstances surrounding the disputes, including the status of
cases that have arisen by reason of similar disputes referred to below, is
considered by

F-27
<PAGE> 83
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

management periodically in determining whether reserves against unpaid balances
are warranted. As of December 31, 1998, provisions have not been considered
necessary by management.

Management believes the issue related to mutual compensation for Internet
traffic to be an industry wide matter that will ultimately be resolved on a
state-by-state basis. To date, at least 29 state commissions and three federal
courts have ruled on the issue and found that ILECs must pay compensation to
competitive carriers for local calls to ISPs located on competitive carriers'
networks. A number of other state commissions currently have proceedings pending
to consider this matter. Management is pursuing this matter vigorously and
believes the ILECs will ultimately pay all amounts in full.

15. SEGMENTS

As an integrated communications provider, the Company has one reportable
operating segment. The revenue of this single segment is derived from four
principal groups of service offerings as reported in the Company's statement of
operations. Substantially all of the Company's revenue is attributable to
customers in the United States. Additionally, all of the Company's assets are
located within the United States.

16. RELATED PARTY

A director of the Company has an indirect financial interest in an
organization engaged by the Company during 1998 to support the implementation of
an enterprise-wide information system. The organization engaged to perform the
implementation was selected by a task force of Company employees from among
several proposing organizations. During 1998, no amounts were paid or payable
under a $450 services contract. The Company expects to continue this
relationship in 1999 and is currently negotiating a contract for additional
services.

17. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly results of operations for
the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1998.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
1997 1998(A) 1997 1998(B) 1997 1998(C) 1997 1998
-------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues........................ $ 43,938 $ 136,786 $ 50,132 $ 190,230 $ 71,246 $ 192,353 $ 82,583 $ 193,414
Operating expenses.............. (64,727) (250,389) (74,146) (280,467) (160,624) (233,574) (111,853) (265,659)
-------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss from operations............ (20,789) (113,603) (24,014) (90,237) (89,378) (41,221) (29,270) (72,245)
Other income (expense).......... (6,615) (38,572) (5,635) (41,818) (10,953) (44,632) (10,635) (44,901)
-------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss before extraordinary
item.......................... (27,404) (152,175) (29,649) (132,055) (100,331) (85,853) (39,905) (117,146)
Extraordinary loss.............. -- -- -- -- (43,834) -- -- --
-------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss........................ (27,404) (152,175) (29,649) (132,055) (144,165) (85,853) (39,905) (117,146)
Preferred stock dividends and
accretions.................... (3,375) (18,594) (9,848) (18,876) (13,895) (30,647) (16,624) (22,227)
-------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss attributable to common
stockholders.................. $(30,779) $(170,769) $(39,497) $(150,931) $(158,060) $(116,500) $ (56,529) $(139,373)
======== ========= ======== ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Loss before extraordinary
item.......................... $ (0.95) $ (4.83) $ (1.19) $ (3.49) $ (3.41) $ (2.48) $ (1.62) $ (2.87)
Extraordinary item.............. -- -- -- -- (1.31) -- -- --
-------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss per common share....... $ (0.95) $ (4.83) $ (1.19) $ (3.49) $ (4.72) $ (2.48) $ (1.62) $ (2.87)
======== ========= ======== ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>

F-28
<PAGE> 84
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

- ---------------

(a) Results of first quarter reflect the acquisition of Shared effective January
1, 1998 and a resulting $63,000 in-process R&D charge.
(b) Results of second quarter reflect the acquisitions of LDS and National
effective March 31, 1998 and April 1, 1998, respectively.
(c) Results of the third quarter reflect the acquisition of DIGEX effective July
1, 1997 and a resulting $60,000 in-process R&D charge.

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has announced its expectation that its wholly-owned, Web
hosting subsidiary, DIGEX, will offer to sell a portion of its capital stock to
the public. While Intermedia expects to own at least 51% of the capital stock of
DIGEX after the public offering, Intermedia may take other actions in the future
which would further decrease its ownership interest. DIGEX anticipates using the
proceeds of the public offering to finance a portion of the expenses and capital
requirements associated with the continued expansion of the Web hosting
business, including the construction of additional data centers. Intermedia
anticipates funding DIGEX's future capital requirements independently of
Intermedia. The Company may elect not to proceed with a DIGEX offering based on
valuation issues or marketing considerations. There can be no assurance that
DIGEX will successfully complete the planned public offering or, if completed,
the timing of the offering or the proceeds DIGEX will receive.

During 1999, the Company's board of directors approved a plan to sell up to
$300,000 principal amount of senior notes and $200,000 gross proceeds of senior
subordinated discount notes.

F-29
<PAGE> 85

SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONS
-----------------------
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
BEGINNING OF COSTS AND OTHER DEDUCTIONS -- END OF
DESCRIPTION PERIOD EXPENSES ACCOUNTS DESCRIBE PERIOD
- ----------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the year ended December 31,
1996:
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts..................... $ 869 $ 2,285 -- $1,808(2) $ 1,346
======== ======== ====== ====== ========
Allowance for deferred tax
assets....................... 7,765 21,764 -- -- 29,529
======== ======== ====== ====== ========
For the year ended December 31,
1997:
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts..................... $ 1,346 $ 6,858 $1,464(1) $5,417(2) $ 4,251
======== ======== ====== ====== ========
Allowance for deferred tax
assets....................... 29,529 71,750 -- -- 101,279
======== ======== ====== ====== ========
For the year ended December 31,
1998:
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts..................... $ 4,251 24,461 2,680 9,163 22,229
======== ======== ====== ====== ========
Allowance for deferred tax
assets....................... 101,279 195,073 -- -- 296,352
======== ======== ====== ====== ========
Restructuring reserve............. -- 32,300(3) -- 26,800(3) 5,500
======== ======== ====== ====== ========
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(1) Amount represents allowance for accounts purchased in the Shared and
National business combinations.
(2) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
(3) Amounts represent accruals, payments and other reductions as disclosed in
the Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-30
<PAGE> 86

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Shared
Technologies Fairchild Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31,
1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit and the report of the other auditors provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Shared Technologies Fairchild Inc. at December 31, 1997, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

February 13, 1998 except for Note 20,
as to which the date is March 10, 1998
Vienna, Virginia

F-31
<PAGE> 87

SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
--------------------
1997 1996
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 4,685 $ 2,703
Billed accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,015 and $611 at December 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively..................................... 22,038 23,752
Unbilled accounts receivable.............................. 8,072 8,811
Inventories............................................... 4,842 1,976
Other current assets...................................... 3,480 1,853
-------- --------
Total current assets........................................ 43,117 39,095
Property and equipment at cost:
Telecommunications........................................ 98,645 90,158
Office and data processing................................ 7,054 5,776
-------- --------
105,699 95,934
Accumulated depreciation and amortization................. (40,297) (28,169)
-------- --------
Property and equipment, net............................... 65,402 67,765
Other assets:
Costs in excess of net assets acquired, less accumulated
amortization of $12,790 and $6,189 for 1997 and 1996,
respectively........................................... 248,790 253,329
Deferred financing and debt issuance costs................ 7,332 8,513
Investment in affiliates.................................. 727 457
Other..................................................... 828 407
-------- --------
257,677 262,706
-------- --------
Total....................................................... $366,196 $369,566
======== ========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.
F-32
<PAGE> 88

SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31
--------------------
1997 1996
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations............................................ $124,046 $ 13,576
Note payable to related party (Note 14)................... 48,150 --
Accounts payable.......................................... 22,960 17,356
Accrued expenses.......................................... 18,451 9,558
Advanced billings......................................... 6,978 6,935
Accrued dividends......................................... 2,180 435
-------- --------
Total current liabilities................................... 222,765 47,860
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations................ 143,207 238,261
Redeemable put warrant...................................... 1,130 1,069
-------- --------
Total liabilities........................................... 367,102 287,190
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 250
shares authorized and outstanding......................... 25,000 25,000
Redeemable special preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 200
shares authorized and outstanding in 1996................. -- 14,167
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value:
Series C, authorized 1,500 shares, outstanding 428
shares in 1996........................................ -- 4
Series D, authorized 1,000 shares, outstanding 64 and
441 shares in 1997 and 1996, respectively............. 1 4
Common stock, $0.004 par value; 50,000 shares authorized,
18,130 and 15,682 shares issued and outstanding in 1997
and 1996, respectively................................. 73 63
Capital in excess of par value............................ 117,602 76,054
Accumulated deficit....................................... (143,582) (32,916)
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)........................ (25,906) 43,209
-------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)........ $366,196 $369,566
======== ========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.
F-33
<PAGE> 89

SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Shared telecommunication services...................... $ 105,248 $ 96,016 $ 35,176
Telecommunication systems.............................. 76,579 61,225 11,910
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenues........................................... 181,827 157,241 47,086
COST OF REVENUES:
Shared telecommunication services...................... 55,147 45,133 19,473
Telecommunication systems.............................. 45,209 37,439 9,399
--------- --------- ---------
Total cost of revenues................................... 100,356 82,572 28,872
--------- --------- ---------
Gross margin............................................. 81,471 74,669 18,214
Selling, general and administrative expenses............. 88,398 55,329 16,188
--------- --------- ---------
Operating income......................................... (6,927) 19,340 2,026
Other income (expense):
Merger related fees (Note 16).......................... (62,250) -- --
Equity in loss of affiliates........................... (211) (3,927) (1,752)
Interest expense....................................... (29,775) (22,903) (882)
Interest income........................................ 33 15 205
Gain on sale of subsidiary stock....................... -- -- 1,375
--------- --------- ---------
(92,203) (26,815) (1,054)
--------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income before income tax provision and
extraordinary item..................................... (99,130) (7,475) 972
Income tax provision..................................... (380) (783) (45)
--------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income before extraordinary item.................. (99,510) (8,258) 927
Extraordinary item, loss on early retirement of debt..... -- (311) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net (loss) income........................................ (99,510) (8,569) 927
Preferred stock dividends................................ (4,628) (2,366) (398)
--------- --------- ---------
Net (loss) income applicable to common stockholders...... $(104,138) $ (10,935) $ 529
========= ========= =========
Basic and diluted (loss) income per common share:
(Loss) income before extraordinary item................ $ (6.75) $ (0.77) $ 0.06
Extraordinary item..................................... -- (0.02) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net (loss) income...................................... $ (6.75) $ (0.79) $ 0.06
========= ========= =========
Weighted average common shares outstanding............... 16,381 13,787 8,482
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.
F-34
<PAGE> 90

SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SERIES C SERIES D SERIES E SERIES F
PREFERRED STOCK PREFERRED STOCK PREFERRED STOCK PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January 1, 1995.......... 907 $ 9 457 $ 5 400 $ 4 700 $ 7 6,628 $27
Preferred stock dividends.........
Dividend accretion of redeemable
put warrant.....................
Exercise of common stock options
and warrants.................... 17
Issuance of common stock.......... 405 2
Conversion of preferred stock..... (400) (4) (700) (7) 1,100 4
Proceeds from sale of common stock
net of expenses of $112......... 300 1
Common stock issued in lieu of
compensation and payment of
accrued expenses................ 56
Net income........................
---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ------ ---
Balance, December 31, 1995........ 907 $ 9 457 $ 5 $-- $-- 8,506 $34
Preferred stock dividends.........
Exercise of common stock options
and warrants.................... 675 3
Issuance of common stock.......... 6,000 24
Conversion of preferred stock..... (479) (5) (16) (1) 442 1
Issuance of common stock for
benefit plan.................... 59 1
Net loss..........................
---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ------ ---
Balance, December 31, 1996........ 428 $ 4 441 $ 4 $-- $-- 15,682 $63
Preferred stock dividends.........
Exercise of common stock options
and warrants.................... 1,715 7
Issuance of common stock.......... 35
Conversion of preferred stock..... (428) (4) (383) (3) 698 3
Redemption price in excess of the
carrying value of special
preferred stock.................
Acceleration of stock options.....
Merger related fees...............
Net income(loss)..................
---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ------ ---
Balance, December 31, 1997........ $-- 58 $ 1 $-- $-- 18,130 $73
==== === ==== === ==== === ==== === ====== ===

<CAPTION>
CAPITAL IN OBLIGATIONS
EXCESS OF TO ISSUE TOTAL
PAR ACCUMULATED COMMON STOCKHOLDERS'
VALUE DEFICIT STOCK EQUITY
---------- ----------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January 1, 1995.......... $ 41,488 $ (22,465) $ 1,806 $ 20,881
Preferred stock dividends......... (398) (398)
Dividend accretion of redeemable
put warrant..................... (45) (45)
Exercise of common stock options
and warrants.................... 70 70
Issuance of common stock.......... 1,804 (1,806)
Conversion of preferred stock..... 7
Proceeds from sale of common stock
net of expenses of $112......... 1,162 1,163
Common stock issued in lieu of
compensation and payment of
accrued expenses................ 246 246
Net income........................ 927 927
-------- --------- -------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1995........ $ 44,777 $ (21,981) $ -- $ 22,844
Preferred stock dividends......... (2,366) (2,366)
Exercise of common stock options
and warrants.................... 3,210 3,213
Issuance of common stock.......... 27,726 27,750
Conversion of preferred stock..... 5
Issuance of common stock for
benefit plan.................... 336 337
Net loss.......................... (8,569) (8,569)
-------- --------- -------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1996........ $ 76,054 $ (32,916) $ -- $ 43,209
Preferred stock dividends......... (4,628) (4,628)
Exercise of common stock options
and warrants.................... 3,363 3,370
Issuance of common stock.......... 281 281
Conversion of preferred stock..... 4
Redemption price in excess of the
carrying value of special
preferred stock................. (6,528) (6,528)
Acceleration of stock options..... 1,900 1,900
Merger related fees............... 36,000 36,000
Net income(loss).................. (99,510) (99,510)
-------- --------- -------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1997........ $117,602 $(143,582) $ -- $(25,906)
======== ========= ======== ========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-35
<PAGE> 91

SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)........................................... $(99,510) $ (8,569) $ 927
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 19,916 15,530 3,967
Accretion on 12 1/4% bonds............................. 15,973 11,526 --
Equity in loss of affiliate............................ 211 3,927 1,752
Termination fees paid by other......................... 62,250 -- --
Other.................................................. 6,667 1,321 (787)
Change in assets and liabilities (Note 18)................ 11,967 662 (981)
-------- --------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities................... 17,474 24,397 4,878
-------- --------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment....................................... (13,464) (9,702) (3,679)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired.......................... (2,068) (225,924) (1,382)
Payments to affiliate....................................... (752) (8,407) --
Other....................................................... 271 (2,804) (866)
-------- --------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities....................... (16,013) (246,837) (5,927)
-------- --------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations............................................... (23,576) (12,662) (2,226)
Proceeds from borrowing..................................... 23,019 244,999 2,684
Proceeds from sales of common and preferred stock........... 3,651 3,213 1,233
Preferred stock dividends paid.............................. (2,573) (1,467) (398)
Deferred financing and debt issuance costs.................. -- (9,416) --
Other....................................................... -- -- 60
-------- --------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities................... 521 224,667 1,353
-------- --------- -------
Net increase in cash........................................ 1,982 2,227 304
Cash, beginning of year..................................... 2,703 476 172
-------- --------- -------
Cash, end of year........................................... $ 4,685 $ 2,703 $ 476
======== ========= =======
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the years for:
Interest.................................................... $ 12,732 $ 11,377 $ 856
Income taxes................................................ 380 223 84
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
Retirement of special preferred stock with debt............. 21,899 -- --
Issuance of preferred stock in connection with
acquisition............................................... -- 38,269 --
Issuance of common stock to acquire FII..................... -- 27,750 --
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.
F-36
<PAGE> 92

SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

1. BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION

On March 13, 1996, Shared Technologies Inc., merged with Fairchild
Industries, Inc. ("FII"), and changed its name to Shared Technologies Fairchild
Inc. ("Shared") (see Note 3 for additional information concerning this merger).

Shared, together with its subsidiaries (collectively the "Company")
operates in the telecommunications industry by providing shared
telecommunications services ("STS") and telecommunications systems ("Systems")
which provides telecommunications and office automation services and equipment
to tenants of office buildings.

On November 20, 1997, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger with Intermedia Communications Inc. ("Intermedia") (the "Proposed
Merger"). In February 1998 the Boards of Directors of both the Company and
Intermedia and the shareholders of the Company approved the Proposed Merger. The
transaction is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 1998.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its majority-owned subsidiaries in which the Company has a controlling
interest. The effects of all significant intercompany transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in companies owned between 20% and 50%
by the Company are recorded using the equity method.

CASH EQUIVALENTS/STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For purposes of these statements, the Company considers all highly liquid
investments with original maturity dates of three months or less as cash
equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which at
times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any
losses in such accounts and believes it is not subject to any significant credit
risk on cash.

UNBILLED RECEIVABLES AND ADVANCED BILLINGS

Unbilled receivables arise from those contracts under which billings can
only be rendered upon the achievement of certain contract stages or upon
submission of appropriate billing detail. Advanced billings represent
pre-billings for services not yet rendered. Advanced billings are generally for
services to be rendered within one year.

INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined
primarily using the weighted average method. The inventories consist of
telecommunications equipment to be installed at customer sites.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Properties are stated at cost and depreciated over estimated useful lives,
generally on a straight-line basis. All telecommunications equipment is
classified as equipment. No interest costs were capitalized in any of the years
presented. Useful lives for property and equipment are:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Telecommunications equipment................................ 8 years
Office and data processing.................................. 3-8 years
</TABLE>

F-37
<PAGE> 93
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment amounted to $12,128,
$10,133, and $3,534 for 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The majority of the Company's revenues are related to the sale and
installation of telecommunications equipment and services and maintenance after
the sale. Service revenues are billed and earned on a monthly basis. For systems
installations, which usually require three to five months, the Company uses the
percentage-of-completion method, measured by costs incurred versus total
estimated cost at completion. The Company bills equipment rentals, local
telephone access service, and maintenance contracts in advance. The deferred
revenue is relieved when the revenue is earned. Systems equipment sales are
recognized at time of shipment.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

AMORTIZATION OF COST IN EXCESS OF NET ASSETS ACQUIRED

The excess of cost of purchased businesses over the fair value of their net
assets at acquisition dates is being amortized on a straight-line basis,
primarily over 40 years. The Company recorded amortization of $6,601, $5,397,
and $433 for the years ended 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.

DEFERRED FINANCING AND DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS

Costs incurred related to the issuance of debt are deferred and are being
amortized over the life of the related debt. The amortization of deferred
financing and debt issuance costs included in interest expense was $1,172, $939
and $0 in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in
taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates
applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to effect
taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce
the deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

During 1997, Shared adopted SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," which
requires the Company to present basic and diluted earnings per share for all
years presented. Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by deducting
preferred stock dividends and premiums paid to redeem preferred stock from net
income. The resulting net income applicable to common stock is divided by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. For the year ended
December 31, 1997 the premium paid to redeem the special preferred stock of
$6,528 was included in the calculation of basic earnings per share, as described
above.

F-38
<PAGE> 94
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income
applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares and the effect of preferred stock conversions, if dilutive.
Diluted income (loss) per common share is substantially the same as basic income
(loss) per common share for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996.

For the years ended December 31, 1997, and 1996, because of their
anti-dilutive effect, the redeemable convertible preferred stock, redeemable put
warrant, and all stock options have been excluded from the computation of
dilutive earnings per share. In total, these common stock equivalents could have
increased the number of common shares outstanding by 142 and 117 shares for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, prior to any assumed
common share repurchases by the Company. The following is a reconciliation of
the numerator and denominator of the basic and dilutive earning per share
calculation for the year ended December 31, 1995.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
-----------------------------------------
INCOME SHARES PER-SHARE
(NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT
----------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Basic earnings....................................... $529 8,482 $0.062
Effect of Dilutive Securities
Redeemable put warrant............................. -- 31
Warrants........................................... -- 140
Stock options...................................... -- 134
---- -----
Diluted earnings..................................... $529 8,787 $0.060
==== =====
</TABLE>

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

In accordance with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," the Company
reviews its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, goodwill and
identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully
recoverable. To determine recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company
evaluates the probability that future undiscounted net cash flows, without
interest charges, will be less than the carrying amount of the assets.
Impairment is measured at fair value. There was no impairment of long-lived
assets in 1997 and 1996.

3. THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND OTHER ACQUISITIONS

On March 13, 1996, the Company's stockholders approved and the Company
consummated its merger with FII, a subsidiary of RHI Holdings, Inc. ("RHI") for
consideration of $295,191 of securities and assumed debt. Under the merger
agreement, Shared issued to RHI 6,000 shares of common stock, 250 shares of
convertible preferred stock with a $25,000 initial liquidation preference and
200 shares of special preferred stock with a $20,000 initial liquidation
preference (see Note 8). The Company issued 12 1/4% Senior Subordinated Discount
Notes due 2006 with an initial accreted value of $114,999 and received $125,000
(of an available $145,000) in loans from a credit facility with financial
institutions (see Note 5). The funds were used primarily for the retirement of
certain liabilities assumed from FII in connection with the merger, and the
retirement of the Company's existing credit facility. In connection with the
merger, the Company entered into two-year employment agreements with key
employees for annual compensation aggregating $1,250, and adopted the 1996
Equity Incentive Plan. The merger was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and resulted in $248,117 of cost in excess of net assets acquired,
which is being amortized over 40 years.

F-39
<PAGE> 95
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

The following unaudited pro forma financial statement of operations for
1996 give effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
--------
<S> <C>
Revenues.................................................... $184,525
Income before extraordinary items........................... (4,621)
Net income.................................................. (4,932)
Net income available to common stockholders................. (8,520)
(Loss) income per common share:
(Loss) income before extraordinary item................... (0.60)
Extraordinary item........................................ (0.02)
--------
Net (loss) income........................................... $ (0.62)
========
</TABLE>

4. ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses at December 31, 1997 and 1996, consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------- ------
<S> <C> <C>
State sales and excise taxes................................ $ 4,105 $1,986
Property taxes.............................................. 662 230
Concession fees............................................. 676 204
Salaries and wages.......................................... 7,560 3,598
Other....................................................... 5,448 3,540
------- ------
$18,451 $9,558
======= ======
</TABLE>

5. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following at
December 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Credit Facility Term Loans.................................. $100,500 $113,250
Revolving Credit Facility................................... 23,000 10,000
Senior Subordinated Discount Notes.......................... 142,498 126,525
Other long-term debt and capital leases..................... 1,255 2,062
-------- --------
267,253 251,837
Less current portion........................................ 124,046 13,576
-------- --------
$143,207 $238,261
======== ========
</TABLE>

THE CREDIT FACILITY

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Shared Technologies
Fairchild Communications Corp. ("STFCC"), entered into a Credit Facility with a
consortium of banks (the "Lenders") upon the merger with FII in March 1996. The
Credit Facility consists of (a) a Tranche A Senior Secured Term Loan Facility
providing for term loans to the Company in a principal amount not to exceed
$50,000 (the

F-40
<PAGE> 96
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

"Tranche A Term Facility"); (b) a Tranche B Senior Secured Term Loan Facility
providing for term loans to the Company in a principal amount not to exceed
$70,000 (the "Tranche B Term Facility" and, together with the Tranche A Term
Facility, the "Term Facilities"); and (c) a Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Facility providing for revolving loans to the Company in an aggregate principal
amount at any time not to exceed $25,000 (the "Revolving Facility").

The Tranche A Term Facility requires quarterly payments due over 5 years;
$34,000 and $44,750 was outstanding at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
The Tranche B Term Facility requires quarterly payments over 7 years; $66,500
and $68,500 was outstanding at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.

The Company will be required to make mandatory prepayments of loans in
amounts, at times and subject to exceptions (a) in respect of 75% (subject to
step-down based upon a leverage ratio test) of consolidated excess cash flow of
the Company and its subsidiaries, (b) in respect of 100% of the net proceeds of
certain dispositions of assets or the stock of subsidiaries or the incurrence of
certain indebtedness by the Company or any of its subsidiaries and (c) in
respect of 100% (subject to step-down based upon a leverage ratio test) of the
net proceeds of the issuance of any equity securities by the Company or any of
its subsidiaries. At the Company's option, loans may be repaid, and revolving
credit commitments may be permanently reduced, in whole or in part, at any time.

The obligations of the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, STFCC, under the
Credit Facility are unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by the
Company and the subsidiary guarantors. In addition, the Credit Facility is
secured by first priority security interests in all the capital stock and the
tangible and intangible assets of the Company and the guarantors, including all
the capital stock of, or other equity interests in, the Company and each direct
or indirect domestic subsidiary of the Company. The wholly owned subsidiary,
STFCC, is restricted from payment of dividends or other distributions to its
parent, Shared, except to the extent necessary to pay preferred dividends and
other identified items.

At the Company's option, the interest rates per annum applicable to the
Credit Facility will be either Adjusted LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.75%
to 3.50%, or the Adjusted Base Rate plus a margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.50%.
The Alternate Base Rate is the higher of Credit Suisse's Prime Rate and the
Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%. At December 31, 1997 and 1996, the
interest rate for the Tranche A Term Facility was 8.54% and 8.38%, and the
interest rate for the Tranche B Term Facility was 9.29% and 9.13%, respectively.
The Revolving Facility interest rates at December 31, 1997 and 1996 ranged from
8.19% to 10.25% and from 8.13% to 10.0%, respectively.

As required under the Credit Agreement, the Company entered into interest
rate swap agreements with two commercial banks. The three contracts, each with a
$10,000 notional amount, expire from May 1999 through May 2001. In order to
protect the Company from interest rate increases, the agreements require the
Company to pay a fixed interest rate in lieu of a variable interest rate. The
Company accounts for the interest rate swaps as hedge agreements and recognizes
interest expense based on the fixed rate.

The Credit Facility contains a number of significant convenants that, among
other things, restricts the ability of the Company to dispose of assets, incur
additional indebtedness, repay other indebtedness or amend other debt
instruments, pay dividends, create liens on assets, enter into leases,
investments or acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, make capital
expenditures, or engage in certain transactions with subsidiaries and affiliates
and otherwise restrict corporate activities. In addition, under the Credit
Facility, the Company is required to comply with specified financial ratios and
tests, including a limitation on capital expenditures, a minimum Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization ("EBITDA") test (as defined), a
fixed charge coverage ratio, an interest coverage ratio, a leverage ratio and a
minimum net worth test. As of December 31, 1997 the Company was in default on
certain covenants related to its Term

F-41
<PAGE> 97
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Facility and its Revolving Facility which could result in the acceleration of
required payments and therefore the entire remaining balances at December 31,
1997 have been classified as current liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet (see Note 20).

SENIOR SUBORDINATED DISCOUNT NOTES

As part of the acquisition of FII, the Company also issued $163,637 of
aggregate principal amount (with an initial accreted value of $114,999) of
Senior Subordinated Discount Notes (the "Discount Notes"). The discount notes
bear an annual interest rate of 12.25% with the principal fully due on March 1,
2006. Interest will begin accruing on March 1, 1999, with payments due
semi-annually thereafter. The discount on the Discount Notes is being amortized
to interest expense using the effective interest method over the three year
accretion period, ending March 1, 1999.

The Discount Notes are not redeemable prior to March 1, 2001 except that,
subject to certain limitations, until 1999, the Company may redeem, at its
option, up to an aggregate of 25% of the principal amount of the Discount Notes
at a specified redemption price plus accrued interest until the date of the
redemption. On or after March 2001, the Discount Notes are redeemable at the
option of the Company, in whole or in part, at the specified redemption prices
plus accrued interest to the date of redemption.

Upon a change in control of the Company, as defined, the holders of the
Discount Notes may require the Company to repurchase the Discount Notes at 101%
of the accreted value plus accrued interest to the date of repurchase. As part
of the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Intermedia (Note 1), Intermedia
purchased the Discount Notes. Intermedia plans to retire the Notes subsequent to
the consummation of the Proposed Merger.

The Discount Notes of the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, STFCC, are
subordinated to all existing and future senior indebtedness, as defined, of the
Company. The Discount Notes are unconditionally and jointly and severely
guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by the Company and its
subsidiary guarantors.

In addition to similar restrictions to the Credit Agreement, the indenture
under which the Discount Notes were issued limits (i) the issuance of additional
debt and preferred stock by the Company and subsidiaries, (ii) the payment of
dividends on capital stock of the Company and its subsidiaries and the purchase,
redemption or retirement of capital stock or indebtedness, (iii) investments,
and (iv) sales of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries.

BANK REVOLVER

In May 1994, the Company entered into a $5,000 financing agreement with a
bank collateralized by certain assets of the Company. The agreement provided for
a revolving credit line for a maximum, as defined, of $4,000 to be used for
expansion in the shared telecommunications services business and a $1,000 term
loan. The Company retired this debt in 1996 and recorded an extraordinary
expense of $311.

F-42
<PAGE> 98
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

DEBT MATURITY

Scheduled maturities on long-term debt and capital lease obligations are as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM CAPITAL LEASE
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 DEBT OBLIGATIONS
----------------------- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
1998........................................................ $123,722 $324
1999........................................................ 126 83
2000........................................................ 36 20
2001........................................................ 85 --
2002........................................................ 92 --
Thereafter.................................................. 163,904 --
-------- ----
Subtotal.................................................. 287,965 427
Less -- accretion of 12 1/4% Discount Notes................. (21,139) --
-------- ----
Total debt maturities....................................... $266,826 $427
======== ====
</TABLE>

The Company is not in compliance with various debt covenants as previously
described, and is therefore in default under the terms thereof. This permits the
holders of such indebtedness to accelerate the maturity of such indebtedness
which could cause default under such indebtedness of the Company (See Note 20).

6. REDEEMABLE PUT WARRANT

In connection with the May 1994 bank financing agreement, the Company
issued the bank a redeemable put warrant for a number of common shares of the
Company's outstanding common stock, subject to certain anti-dilution
adjustments. The warrant was redeemable at the Company's option prior to May
1996, and is redeemable at the bank's option at any time after May 1997. As
defined in the agreement, the Company has guaranteed the bank a minimum of $500
in cash upon redemption of the warrant, and therefore, initially valued the
warrant at the present value of the minimum guarantee discounted at 11.25%. To
the extent that the Company's stock price exceeds approximately $6.03 per share,
the bank may elect to receive stock in lieu of $500 cash as the value of the
stock will exceed $500. At December 31, 1997 and 1996, the Company's stock price
was $15.00 and $9.125 per share, respectively. The Company has therefore
accreted through interest expense the additional value due to the bank,
resulting in a liability of $1,130 and $1,069 at December 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The liability will continue to fluctuate until redemption based on
the Company's stock prices.

7. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

In connection with the Merger, the Company issued non-voting Convertible
Preferred Stock to RHI with an initial liquidation preference of $25,000.
Dividends on the Convertible Preferred Stock are payable quarterly at the rate
of 6% per annum in cash. If for any reason a dividend is not paid in cash when
scheduled, the amount of such dividend shall accrue interest at a rate of 12%
per annum until paid.

The Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $25,000 in
the aggregate plus an additional amount equal to the total amount of dividends
the holder would have received if dividends were paid quarterly in cash at the
rate of 10% per annum for the life of the issue, minus the total amount of cash
dividends actually paid (the "Liquidation Preference"). At December 31, 1997 the
liquidation preference was

F-43
<PAGE> 99
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

$26,680. Each share is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into
such number of Common Shares as is determined by dividing the Liquidation
Preference thereof by the conversion price of $6.375. The conversion price is
subject to adjustment upon occurrence of adjustment events including, but not
limited to, stock dividends, stock subdivisions and reclassifications or
combinations.

The Convertible Preferred Stock is not redeemable at the Company's option
during the first three years after issuance, but thereafter, upon 30 days' prior
written notice, is redeemable at the Company's option at a redemption price of
100% of the Liquidation Preference. In March 2008, the Company is required to
redeem 100% of the outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stock at the
Liquidation Preference. During 1997 Intermedia purchased substantially all of
the Convertible Preferred Stock.

SPECIAL PREFERRED STOCK

In connection with the Merger, the Company issued non-voting Special
Preferred Stock to RHI with an initial Liquidation Preference of $20,000 and
recorded at an initial fair value of $13,269. No dividends are payable on the
Special Preferred Stock until 2007 when the outstanding Special Preferred Stock
will receive a dividend at a rate equal to the interest rate on the Discount
Notes and calculated on the then outstanding Liquidation Preference. The Special
Preferred Stock's initial liquidation preference of $20,000 will increase by
$1,000 each year after 1996 to a maximum Liquidation Preference of $30,000 in
2007. The Company is accreting the Special Preferred stock to $30,000 using the
effective interest method and records the accretion as preferred dividends.

Shares are redeemable at the Company's option at any time upon 30 days'
prior written notice, at a redemption price of 100% of the Liquidation
Preference. All outstanding Special Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable in
its entirety at 100% of the Liquidation Preference upon a change of control of
the Company and, in any event, in 2008. In addition, in March of each year,
commencing with March 31, 1997, the Company is required to redeem, at a price
equal to 100% of the liquidation preference in effect from time to time, an
amount of Special Preferred Stock equal to 50% of the amount, if any, by which
the consolidated EBITDA, as defined, of the Company and its subsidiaries exceeds
a specified amount for the immediately preceding year ended December 31. On
November 20, 1997, in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Merger between
the Company and Intermedia (see Note 1), Intermedia agreed to loan the Company
funds necessary to redeem the outstanding special preferred stock. The Company
then redeemed the Special Preferred Stock for $21,899. The redemption resulted
in an accretion of $6,528, which was charged to Accumulated Deficit. The
borrowings from Intermedia of $21,899 is reflected in notes payable to related
parties on the face of the balance sheet.

8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

COMMON STOCK

The Company has authorized 50,000 shares of common stock at $0.004 par
value per share with equal voting rights.

SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK

These shares were converted in August 1997 into 315 shares of common stock.
Series C Preferred Stock was non-voting and was entitled to a liquidation value
of $4 per share and dividends of $.32 per share per annum, payable quarterly in
arrears.

F-44
<PAGE> 100
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK

In December 1993, the Company commenced a private placement to sell to
certain investors units consisting of one share of Series D Preferred Stock and
one warrant to purchase one share of common stock. As of December 31, 1995, the
Company had sold 457 units for net proceeds of $1,740, after deducting expenses
of $430. Series D Preferred Stock is entitled to dividends of 5% per annum,
payable quarterly, and maybe redeemed for $7 per share, plus all accrued
dividends, at the option of the Company. The shares are non-voting and are
convertible into shares of the Company's common stock on a one-for-one basis at
the holder's option. The shares are senior to all shares of the Company's common
stock and junior to Series C Preferred Stock. The common stock purchase warrants
are exercisable at a per share price of $5.75. In connection with the offering,
an investment banking firm received warrants to purchase 16 shares of the
Company's common stock at an exercise price of $5.75 per share. As of December
31, 1997 and 1996, 479 and 428 warrants, respectively, had been exercised.

SERIES E PREFERRED STOCK

The Series E Preferred Stock was converted into 400 shares of common stock
in January 1995. The holders also received warrants, which expire on December
31, 1999, to purchase 175 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise
price of $4.25 per share, subject to certain anti-dilutive provisions.

SERIES F PREFERRED STOCK

These shares were converted on August 1, 1995 into 700 shares of common
stock. In 1996, an additional 111 shares of the Company's common stock were
issued in connection with the provisions of conversion of the Series F Preferred
Stock, as defined.

Additionally, the Company issued warrants to the previous owners of a
subsidiary of the Company to purchase 225 shares of the Company's common stock
at an exercise price of $4.25 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution
adjustments.

9. GAIN ON SALE OF SUBSIDIARY COMMON STOCK

In April 1995, Shared Technologies Cellular, Inc., an equity investee of
the Company, completed its SB 2 filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and became a public company. Prior to this date, STC was
approximately an 86% owned subsidiary of the Company. STC sold 950 shares of
common stock at $5.25 per share, which generated net proceeds of approximately
$3,274 after underwriters' commissions and offering expenses. The net effect of
the public offering on the consolidated financial statements was a gain of
approximately $1,375.

10. STOCK OPTION PLANS

1987 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Under the 1987 Stock Option Plan (the "1987 Plan"), the Company is
authorized to issue options to purchase an aggregate of 1,200 shares of common
stock of the Company. All options granted are exercisable at the date of grant,
with a term of five to ten years and are exercisable in accordance with vesting
schedules set individually by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 1997
and 1996, approximately 109 and 131 options are available for grant,
respectively. Options to purchase 298 and 556 shares of common stock were
outstanding at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.

F-45
<PAGE> 101
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN

The Board of Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Directors' Plan"), was
adopted by the Board of Directors in 1994 and accepted by the stockholders of
the Company in 1995. Under the Directors' Plan, an "Independent Director" is a
director of the Company who is neither an employee nor a principal stockholder
of the Company. The Directors' Plan provided for a one-time grant of an option
to purchase 15 shares of common stock to all independent directors who served
during the 1994-95 term.

Each independent director who received the initial one-time option grant in
1994, and who was elected to a new term as a director in 1995 or is reelected in
1996, shall receive upon such reelection a grant of an option for 5 or 10
options, respectively. Reelection after 1996 of any independent director in
service as of September 22, 1994, shall entitle such director to a grant of 15
options.

All options issued under the Directors' Plan are exercisable at the closing
bid price for the date proceeding the date of grant. The options vest over three
years and are exercisable for so long as the optionee continues as an
independent director and for a period of 90 days after the optionee ceases to be
a director of the Company. The maximum term of the option is ten years from the
date of grant. The maximum number of shares of common stock which may be issued
under the Directors' Plan is 250 shares, of which options to purchase 85 and 145
are outstanding as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.

1996 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

In connection with the acquisition of FII, the Company adopted the 1996
Equity Incentive Plan (the "1996 Plan"), pursuant to which the Company will
offer shares, and share-based compensation, to key employees. The 1996 Plan
provides for the grant to eligible employees of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares, and performance units
(the "Awards"). The 1996 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of
the Company's Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee").

The 1996 Plan provides that not more than 1,500 shares of common stock will
be granted under the 1996 Plan, subject to certain anti-dilutive adjustments.
The exercise price will be set by the Compensation Committee, but can not be
less than the market value of the stock at date of issuance. Stock appreciation
rights may be granted only in tandem with stock options. Options to purchase
1,069 and 1,478 shares of common stock were outstanding at December 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively.

SUMMARY ACTIVITY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF WEIGHTED
OPTIONS RANGE AVERAGE
--------- ------------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance outstanding
January 1, 1995.................................... 697 $1.72 -- 11.00 $3.78
Granted............................................ 40 4.13 4.13
Expired............................................ (2) 5.00 -- 5.72 5.16
Exercised.......................................... (2) 2.28 -- 2.84 2.58
-----
Balance outstanding
December 31, 1995.................................. 733 $1.72 -- 11.00 3.79
Granted............................................ 1,716 4.13 -- 7.75 4.50
Expired............................................ (32) 4.38 4.38
Exercised.......................................... (238) 1.72 -- 5.50 3.48
-----
</TABLE>

F-46
<PAGE> 102
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF WEIGHTED
OPTIONS RANGE AVERAGE
--------- ------------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance outstanding
December 31, 1996.................................. 2,179 $2.00 -- 11.00 4.37
Granted............................................ 164 5.63 -- 6.50 6.32
Expired............................................ (408) 4.38 -- 5.75 4.45
Exercised.......................................... (483) 2.84 -- 10.18 4.15
-----
Balance Outstanding
December 31, 1997.................................. 1,452 $2.00 -- 11.00 $4.66
</TABLE>

At December 31, 1997, there were 560 options immediately exercisable at
prices ranging from $2.00 to $11.00.

The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," effective for the Company's December
31, 1996, financial statements. The Company applied APB No. 25 and related
interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, compensation cost has
been recognized for its stock plans based on the intrinsic value of the stock
option at date of grant (i.e., the difference between the exercise price and the
fair value of the Company's stock). Had compensation cost for the Company's
stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the
grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method of SFAS No.
123, the Company's net (loss) income and (loss) earnings per share would have
been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
--------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders:
As reported............................................... $(104,138) $(10,935)
Pro forma................................................. (103,316) (12,364)
(Loss) earnings per share:
As reported............................................... (6.75) (0.79)
Pro forma................................................. (6.71) (0.90)
</TABLE>

Because the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting has not been applied to
options granted prior to January 1, 1995, the resulting pro forma compensation
cost may not be representative of that to be expected in future years.

The fair value of each option granted was $3.26 per option and was
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 1997 and 1996:
risk-free interest rates of 5.47% and 6.0%; no dividend yields; expected lives
of 5 to 10 years; and expected volatilities of .521.

11. RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN

On March 3, 1989, the Company adopted a savings and retirement plan (the
"Plan"), which covers substantially all of the Company's employees. Participants
in the Plan may elect to make contributions up to a maximum of 20% of their
compensation. For each participant, the company will make a matching
contribution at one-half of the participant's contributions, up to 5% of the
participant's compensation. Matching contributions may be made in the form of
the Company's common stock and are vested at the rate of 33% per year. The
Company's expense relating to the matching contributions was approximately $706,

F-47
<PAGE> 103
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

$609, and $199 for 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. At December 31, 1997 and
1996, the Plan owned 35 and 148 shares, respectively, of the Company's common
stock.

12. INCOME TAXES

Income tax (expense) benefit consists of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal................................................... $ -- $ -- $ (10)
State and local........................................... (380) (223) (45)
------ ------ ------
(380) (223) (55)
Deferred:
Federal................................................... -- (560) 10
State and local........................................... -- -- --
------ ------ ------
-- (560) 10
------ ------ ------
Total (expense) benefit................................... $ (380) $ (783) $ (45)
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>

The income tax provision for continuing operations differs from that
computed using the statutory Federal income tax rate of 35% in 1997, 1996, and
1995 for the following reasons:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computed statutory amount................................... $ 34,695 $ 2,616 $(340)
Effect of net operating losses.............................. -- -- 285
Valuation allowance on net operating loss tax benefits...... (29,270) (3,004) 10
Business combination cost................................... (10,210) -- --
Other....................................................... 4,405 (395) --
-------- -------- -----
$ (380) $ (783) $ (45)
======== ======== =====
</TABLE>

F-48
<PAGE> 104
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

The following table is a summary of the significant components of the
continuing operations portion of the Company's deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 1997 and 1996.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEFERRED (PROVISION) BENEFIT 1997 1996
- ---------------------------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Equity in loss of subsidiary.............................. $ 1,599 $ 1,588
Accrued expenses not yet tax deductible................... 14,316 5,581
NOL carryforwards......................................... 30,875 9,156
-------- --------
46,790 16,325
Deferred tax liabilities:
Asset basis differences -- fixed assets................... (11,137) (11,008)
Asset basis differences -- intangible assets related to
acquisition (Goodwill and other intangibles)........... (2,439) (1,373)
-------- --------
(13,576) (12,381)
Deferred tax asset, net..................................... 33,214 3,944
Less valuation allowance.................................... (33,214) (3,944)
-------- --------
Net deferred tax asset.................................... $ -- $ --
======== ========
</TABLE>

At December 31, 1997, the Company's Net Operating Loss (NOL) carryforward
for federal income tax purposes is approximately $79,000, expiring between 2001
and 2012. NOL's available for state income tax purposes are less than those for
federal purposes and generally expire earlier. Limitations apply to the use of
NOLs.

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS

The Company has entered into operating leases for the use of office
facilities and equipment, which expire through 2008. Certain of the leases are
subject to escalations for increases in real estate taxes and other operating
expenses. Rent expense amounted to approximately $7,761, $6,093, and $2,200 for
the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. Aggregate
approximate future minimum lease payments are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPERATING
LEASES
---------
<S> <C>
1998........................................................ $ 6,204
1999........................................................ 5,621
2000........................................................ 4,675
2001........................................................ 3,946
2002........................................................ 3,080
Thereafter.................................................. 1,878
-------
$25,404
=======
</TABLE>

F-49
<PAGE> 105
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

CONTINGENCIES

As a result of the acquisition of FII (the "Merger"), the Company became
liable for all liabilities of FII with respect to the operations of the former
businesses of FII, including the FII Telecommunications Business and its
aerospace and industrial fasteners business up to the effective date of the
Merger as well as operations of FII disposed of prior to the Merger, including
its injection molding business. As a matter of law, the Company will not be
released from FII's obligations with respect to such liabilities. As a
pre-condition of the Merger: (a) FII, its parent RHI, and RHI's parent,
Fairchild and certain other subsidiaries of Fairchild underwent a
recapitalization pursuant to which FII divested itself of all assets unrelated
to the FII Telecommunications Business; (b) RHI assumed all liabilities of FII
unrelated to the FII Telecommunications Business (other than the Retained
Liabilities), including but not limited to the following (collectively, the
"Non-communications Liabilities"): (i) contingent liabilities related to a
dispute with the United States Government under Government Contract Accounts
rules concerning potential liability arising out of the use of and accounting
for approximately $50,000 in excess pension funds relating to certain government
contracts in the discontinued aerospace business of FII; (ii) all environmental
liabilities except those related to the FII Telecommunications Business; (iii)
approximately $50,000 (at June 30, 1995) of costs associated with
post-retirement healthcare benefits; and (iv) all other accrued liabilities and
any and all other unasserted liabilities unrelated to the FII Telecommunications
Business; and (c) pursuant to certain indemnification agreements (the
"Indemnification Agreements"), the Company is indemnified (i) by Fairchild and
RHI jointly and severally with respect to all Non-communications Liabilities and
all tax liabilities of FII and Shared resulting from the FII Recapitalization or
otherwise attributable to periods prior to the Merger and (ii) by Fairchild
Holding Corp. (a company formed in connection with the FII Recapitalization)
with respect to the liabilities that are indemnified for being herein
collectively referred to as the "Indemnified Liabilities"). The Company believes
no taxable gain or loss was recognized by FII or any of its affiliates on the
transfer of the FII assets and liabilities pursuant to the FII recapitalization.

In December 1995, a suit was filed against the Company in U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York alleging breach of a letter
agreement and seeking an amount in excess of $2,250 for a commission allegedly
owed to a vendor as a result of a vendor initiating negotiations between the
Company and FII and negotiating the Merger. A vendor has alleged that the
Company entered into a fee agreement, whereby the Company agreed to pay to the
vendor 0.75% of the value of the transaction as a fee. FII has denied that FII
at any time engaged the vendor for this transaction. The Company filed an answer
in January 1996, denying that any commission is owed. This litigation is in the
discovery process. Management believes, however, that an adverse outcome, if
any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.

In January 1994, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for
financial and marketing services, which expired on November 1996. Pursuant to
the consulting agreement, the consultant was issued a three year warrant to
purchase 300 shares of the Company's common stock at a purchase price of $5.75
per share and a five year warrant to purchase 250 shares of the Company's common
stock at a purchase price of $7.00 per share. The consultant may not compete
with the Company during the term of this agreement and for two years thereafter.

In December 1995, the Company granted options to employees of the Company,
STC and certain members of the Board of Directors of the Company and STC, to
purchase an aggregate of 350 shares of STC common stock, held by the Company.
The options are exercisable for five years, at $2.50 per share.

The Company's sales and use tax returns in certain jurisdictions are
currently under examination. Management believes these examinations will not
result in a material change from liabilities provided.

F-50
<PAGE> 106
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

In addition to the above matters, the Company is a party to various legal
actions, the outcome of which, in the opinion of management, will not have a
material adverse effect on results of operations, cash flows or financial
position of the Company.

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

At December 31, 1997 Shared had a note payable to Intermedia of $48,150.
See further discussion in Note 8 and 16.

As of December 31, 1993, the company had paid approximately $288 of life
insurance premiums on behalf of an officer of the Company, which was to be
repaid from the proceeds of a $2,500 face value life insurance policy owned by
the president. In January 1994, the beneficiary on the policy was changed to the
Company in order to reduce the premium payments required by the Company. As of
December 31, 1997, the amount due to the Company for premiums paid exceeded the
cash surrender value of the policy by approximately $141. Accordingly, the
officer has agreed to reimburse the Company for this amount. The receivable and
cash surrender value are reflected in other assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.

15. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,"
requires disclosures of fair value information about financial instruments,
whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to
estimate that value. The following methods and assumptions were used by the
Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

CURRENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet approximates the fair
value for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable,
advanced billings, deferred revenue, accrued liabilities, and capital lease
obligations.

LONG-TERM DEBT

There is no active market for the Company's long-term debt securities, and
consequently, no quoted market prices are available. The Company's long-term
debt securities can be segregated into two distinct categories: variable rate
long-term debt that reprices frequently and fixed rate long-term debt.

Variable Rate Long-term Debt -- The Company's Credit Facility Term Loans,
Credit Revolving Facility and Bank Revolver carry a rate of interest which
varies in relation to LIBOR or prime, a common market interest rate. Because
these loans reprice within one to six months, fluctuations in market interest
rates do not materially impact the fair market value of these obligations.
Therefore, the carrying value of these financial instruments approximate fair
market value.

Fixed Rate Long-Term Debt -- The fair value of the Company's Senior
Subordinated Discount Notes is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis
based on the Company's borrowing cost for similar credit facilities, at December
31, 1997. As minimal changes in the market level of interest rates occurred
since issuance in March 1996, the Company estimates that carrying value
approximates fair market value, at December 31, 1997.

F-51
<PAGE> 107
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS

The Company holds interest rate swap agreements with two commercial banks
in order to reduce the impact of potential interest rate increases on its
variable rate debt. At December 31, 1997 and 1996, it would have cost
approximately $1,348 and $1,059 to break the Company's interest rate swap
agreements, respectively. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by the banks, however, such non-performance is not anticipated.

REDEEMABLE PUT WARRANT

The carrying amount of the redeemable put warrant approximates fair market
value as it is adjusted quarterly to reflect the Company's liability due to the
holder.

REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

The Company estimates the fair market value of the Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock at carrying value based on the conversion feature and underlying
value of common stock at year end. The fair market value of the Redeemable
Special Preferred stock is estimated at carrying cost. Carrying cost reflects a
discount to face value.

This disclosure relates to financial instruments only. The fair value
assumptions were based upon subjective estimates of market conditions and
perceived risks of the financial instruments at a certain point in time.

16. INFREQUENT ITEM

As discussed in Note 1, on November 20, 1997 the Company entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger with Intermedia. Conditions to this agreement were
that Intermedia would pay certain liabilities of the Company that resulted from
the termination of certain contracts of the Company. This payment has been
reflected in the accompanying financial statements. In the event that the
Proposed Merger is not completed, the Company will be required to reimburse
Intermedia $26,250 of the total $62,250 paid. The amount requiring reimbursement
has been included in notes payable to related parties on the face of the balance
sheet. The remaining $36,000 has been reflected as an addition to the Company's
capital paid in excess of par as Intermedia will not require reimbursement and
it is therefore viewed as a permanent investment.

17. EMPLOYEE TERMINATIONS

During 1997 the Company entered into severance agreements with several key
employees. Under the agreements, the Company agreed to certain payments to these
employees and to accelerate the vesting period of any stock options held by
these employees. The total expense recognized for the agreements was $4,162,
with $1,900 of this amount related to the acceleration of the vesting period of
stock options.

The Company also entered into a severance agreement which is contingent
upon the Intermedia and Shared merger (See Note 1). The costs associated with
this severance agreement, $5,329, has been deferred and will be recognized upon
consummation of the said merger.

F-52
<PAGE> 108
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

18. BREAKOUT OF CHANGE IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, NET OF EFFECT OF
ACQUISITIONS:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Accounts receivable......................................... $ 1,446 $ (86) $(2,639)
Other current assets........................................ (4,492) 483 (52)
Other assets................................................ (421) 83 --
Deferred income taxes....................................... -- 560 (10)
Accounts payable............................................ 5,604 (4,277) 2,208
Accrued expenses............................................ 8,893 2,261 (556)
Advance billings............................................ 43 1,203 68
Other liabilities........................................... 894 435 --
------- ------- -------
Total..................................................... $11,967 $ 662 $ (981)
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

19. INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATE:

During December 1995, STC issued approximately $3,000 in voting preferred
stock to third parties. The voting rights assigned to the preferred stock
reduced the Company's voting interest in STC to approximately 42.7 percent,
resulting in the Company's loss of voting control of STC. As a result of
additional common stock issuance to third parties, partially offset by the
Company's receiving 250 shares of STC Series B voting Convertible Preferred
Stock, the Company's voting interest in STC was reduced to approximately 41.3
percent during 1996. Accordingly, STC has been accounted for on the equity
method for 1996 and 1995.

The summarized balance sheet of STC as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related summarized statement of operations of STC for the years then ended,
are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Summarized balance sheet:
Current assets............................................ $ 2,070 $ 5,824
Telecommunications and office equipment, net.............. 2,131 2,158
Other assets.............................................. 10,061 6,396
------- -------
Total assets...................................... $14,262 $14,378
======= =======
Current liabilities....................................... $11,045 $ 7,676
Note payable.............................................. 360 1,600
------- -------
Total liabilities................................. 11,105 9,276
Stockholders' equity...................................... 2,857 5,102
------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........ $14,262 $14,378
======= =======
Summarized statement of operations:
Revenues.................................................. $20,914 $13,613
Gross margin.............................................. 7,285 5,026
Operating loss............................................ 6,888 2,989
Net loss.................................................. 8,796 2,848
</TABLE>

F-53
<PAGE> 109
SHARED TECHNOLOGIES FAIRCHILD INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

20. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On March 10, 1998 the total amount of the outstanding obligations under the
Term Facility and the Revolving Facility (Note 5) of $123,905, in the aggregate,
was paid in full by Intermedia. On this date Shared was released from any liens
granted to the Lenders, the interest rate swap agreements entered into under the
Credit Facility, and has no further obligation to the Lenders.

F-54

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.8
[LOGO]
INTERMEDIA
COMMUNICATIONS

April 21, 1998

Mr. E. Trevor Dignall
6 Tinker Bluff Court
East Setauket, NY 11733

Dear Trevor:

It is with great pleasure that I offer you the position of Senior Vice
President, Human Resources of Intermedia Communications Inc. Assuming that you
accept this offer, you will officially assume this position on or before May 1,
1998.

The primary responsibility of this position is to lead and direct the Company's
efforts to attract and retain employees who will drive the Company to realize
its vision -- and to lead and direct the development of the Company's human
resources in all dimensions: technical, personal skills and competencies, and
management. Fulfillment of this responsibility involves: (1) leading the
Company's efforts to provide employees with a comprehensive and integrated
compensation and benefits programs; (2) facilitating the recruitment,
selection, and hiring processes to build a world-class human resource; (3)
providing comprehensive and timely information to the Company about its human
resources; (4) leading the continuous improvement of the human resources of the
Company by providing leadership in training, development, and communication
with employees; and (5) providing advice and counsel to senior executives of
the Company on matters affecting and affected by human resources.

This is an important officer position within the company which reports directly
to David Ruberg, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President. Annual base
salary is $205,000 (based on 52 weeks service). In addition, this position has
an annual management incentive compensation target opportunity of 40% of base
salary ($82,000. Assuming you start on or before May 1, you would be eligible
for the full target amount in 1998, based on your performance. This bonus
opportunity is contingent upon the achievement of shared corporate objectives
as well as the achievement of two-to-five individual objectives which relate to
your primary responsibilities. You are expected to establish these individual
objectives, with my approval.

This offer includes a stock option grant covering 75,000 shares of common
stock, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. This grant will vest in equal installments over the 60-month period
commencing with the date of your employment by the Company, subject to
customary terms contained in the standard incentive stock options issued by the
Company under the Plan. For pricing purposes, the date of grant will be deemed
to be the date upon which the option has been approved by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. This grant will immediately vest upon a
change in control of the Company.

<PAGE> 2
As an employee of Intermedia, you will be entitled to all employee benefits:
medical insurance, prescription drug card, dental insurance, long-term
disability, life insurance, 401(k) plan, educational reimbursement, holidays,
sick leave, military leave, bereavement leave, voting time off, jury duty
leave, and supplemental executive life insurance. Assuming you start on May 1,
1998, your medical benefits will be effective June 1, 1998. You will be
eligible for 3 weeks of paid vacation per year, including your first year of
employment.

This offer includes a relocation allowance of up to $125,000. Subject to this
limit, you will be reimbursed for relocation expenses (documented by receipts)
in accordance with Intermedia's Relocation Policy, a copy of which is attached.
Reimbursable expenses include items such as transportation of you and your
family, movement of household goods, real estate commission for the sale of the
old home, closing costs associated with the purchase of the new home,
incidental expenses, house hunting trips, temporary living, and trips home from
the temporary residence. The Company will "gross up" the taxable elements of
this reimbursement. The "gross-up" is not considered part of the relocation
allowance.

This relocation assistance will be forgiven over a 12-month period at a rate of
1/12 per month, commencing on the date of your last relocation reimbursement.
If you voluntarily terminate your employment with Intermedia prior to the end
of this 12-month period, the relocation balance that exceeds the forgiven
amount must be repaid to the Company.

In addition, in the event that your employment terminates involuntarily for any
reason other than cause or poor performance, you will be entitled to twelve
months severance pay (base salary only) and executive level outplacement
services.

Trevor, we sincerely believe that Intermedia has an exciting future, filled
with substantial opportunity for business growth and success. We also feel that
you are a very talented person with significant potential to help us grow and
succeed. We are excited about the prospect of you joining the Intermedia team.

Sincerely,

/s/ David C. Ruberg
- -------------------------------------
David C. Ruberg
Chairman, CEO, and President

By signing below I accept this offer:

/s/ E. Trevor Dignall 4-23-98
- ------------------------------------- -----------
E. Trevor Dignall Date

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.9
[LOGO]
INTERMEDIA
COMMUNICATIONS

December 23, 1998

Mr. Richard J. Buyens
115 Van Houten
Chatham, New Jersey 07928

Dear Rick:

It is with great pleasure that I offer you the position of Senior Vice
President, Sales with Intermedia Communications Inc. We anticipate that you
will accept this offer and officially assume this position on or before January
11, 1999.

This is an important officer position within the company that reports directly
to David C. Ruberg, President and CEO. Your annual base salary will be $220,000
(based on 52 weeks service). This will be reviewed again on January 1, 2000.

In addition, this position has an annual management incentive compensation
target opportunity of 40% of base salary ($88,000). This bonus opportunity is
contingent upon the achievement of shared corporate objectives as well as the
achievement of two to five individual objectives that relate to your primary
responsibilities. You are expected to establish these individual objectives,
with my approval.

In lieu of lost stock opportunity with your existing company, you will receive
a $75,000 signing bonus. This will be allocated as follows: $25,000 on April 1,
1999, and the remaining $50,000 on July 1, 1999. This signing bonus creates a
debt to the Company that will be forgiven as follows: the initial $25,000 will
be forgiven at the rate of 1/8 per month for eight months following the date
paid; the remaining $50,000 will be forgiven at the rate of 1/6 per month for
the 6 months following the date paid. Thus, the debt will be completely
forgiven at the completion of 12 months employment. If you voluntarily
terminate your employment with Intermedia prior to the end of this 12 month
period, the signing bonus balance that exceeds the forgiven amount must be
repaid to the Company.

This offer includes a stock option grant covering 100,000 shares of common
stock, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. This grant will vest in equal installments over the 60 month period
commencing with the date of your employment by the Company, subject to
customary terms contained in the standard incentive stock options issued by the
Company, subject to customary terms contained in the standard incentive stock
options issued by the Company under the Plan. This offer also includes an award
of 10,000 shares of restricted stock. The first 5,000 shares will vest at the
end of the first full year of employment, and the remainder at the end of the
second full year of
<PAGE> 2
employment. For pricing purposes, the date of the grants will be deemed to be
the date upon which the options have been approved by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. These grants will immediately vest upon a
change in control of the Company.

As an employee of Intermedia, you will be entitled to all employee benefits:
Medical insurance, prescription drug card, dental insurance, long-term
disability, life insurance, 401(k) Plan, educational reimbursement, holidays,
sick leave, military leave, bereavement leave, voting time off and jury duty
leave, and supplemental executive life insurance. Assuming you start on or
before January 4, 1999, your medical benefits will be effective February 1,
1999. You will be eligible for 3 weeks of paid vacation per year, including your
first year of employment.

This offer includes a relocation allowance of up to $66,000. Subject to this
limit, you will be reimbursed for relocation expenses (documented by receipts)
in accordance with Intermedia's Relocation Policy, a copy of which is attached.
Reimbursable expenses include items such as transportation of you and your
family, movement of household goods, real estate commission for the sale of the
old home, closing costs associated with the purchase of the new home, incidental
expenses and house hunting trips. The Company will "gross up" the taxable
elements of this reimbursement. The "gross-up" is not considered part of the
relocation allowance.

In order that we demonstrate our sensitivity to individual needs during the
relocation period, you will note in the description of the relocation policy
that the Company may also provide temporary housing expenses for a period of up
to six months, separate from the relocation allowance itself. This is subject
to advance agreement with your supervisor and normally includes the provision
of a furnished apartment facility in Tampa and reimbursement of up to two trips
per month during the relocation period between Tampa and your former residence.

This relocation assistance and temporary housing will be forgiven over a
12 month period at a rate of 1/12 per month, commencing on the date of your last
relocation reimbursement. If you voluntarily terminate your employment with
Intermedia prior to the end of this 12-month period, the relocation balance that
exceeds the forgiven amount must be repaid to the Company.

Please contact Lois Durham, Human Resources, (813) 829-4518, to commence the
administration of your relocation.

In addition, if your employment is terminated involuntarily for any
reason other than for cause or poor performance, you will be entitled to twelve
months severance pay (base salary only).

<PAGE> 3

Rick, we sincerely believe that Intermedia has an exciting future, filled
with substantial opportunity for business growth and success. We also feel that
you are a very talented person with significant potential to help us grow and
succeed. We are excited about the prospect of you joining the Intermedia team.

Sincerely,

/s/ David C. Ruberg
- -------------------------------------
David C. Ruberg
President and CEO

Attachments

By signing below I accept this offer:

/s/ Richard J. Buyens 12-24-98
- ------------------------------------- ----------
Richard J. Buyens Date

Please return the signed offer letter and relocation agreement to Human
Resources, in the enclosed, pre-addressed envelope.

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 12.1

FIXED CHARGES

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC.

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, PRO FORMA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1998(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loss before extraordinary items (2,074) (3,067) (19,157) (57,198) (197,289) (487,229) (478,237)
Income tax benefit (provision) -- -- (97) -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss before income taxes (2,074) (3,067) (19,254) (57,198) (197,289) (487,229) (478,237)
================================================================================

Fixed charges:
Interest expensed 844 1,219 13,355 35,213 58,744 201,039 192,933
Capitalized interest 213 257 677 2,780 4,654 7,189 7,189
Amortization of deferred
financing costs 78 69 412 1,252 1,918 4,721 4,721
Estimated interest factor on
operating leases 313 200 428 1,598 3,286 12,091 12,217
Dividends and accretions on
redeemable preferred stock 0 0 0 0 43,742 90,344 90,344
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges 1,448 1,745 14,872 40,843 112,344 315,384 307,404
================================================================================

Earnings:
Loss before income tax (2,074) (3,067) (19,254) (57,198) (197,289) (487,229) (478,237)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed charges excluding
capitalized interest and preferred
stock dividends 1,235 1,488 14,195 38,063 63,948 217,851 209,871
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total earnings (839) (1,579) (5,059) (19,135) (133,341) (269,378) (268,366)
================================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (0.58) (0.90) (0.34) (0.47) (1.19) (0.85) (0.87)
================================================================================

Insufficiency of earnings to cover
fixed charge 2,287 3,324 19,931 59,978 245,685 584,762 575,770
================================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Gives historical and proforma effect to the Shared, LDS and National
acquisitions.

Page 1

<PAGE> 1

EXHIBIT 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS INC.

Intermedia Communications Inc., a Virginia corporation
Intermedia Licensing Company, a Delaware corporation
Intermedia Capital Inc., a Delaware corporation
DIGEX, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation
Shared Technologies Fairchild, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Shared Technologies Fairchild Telecom, Inc., a Delaware
corporation
Access Network Services, Inc., a Texas corporation
Shared Technologies Fairchild Communications Corp., a Delaware
corporation
STF Canada Inc., a Delaware corporation
Access Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation
Netwave Systems, Inc., a Louisiana corporation
Long Distance Savers of the Metroplex, Inc., a Texas
corporation
Express Communications, Inc., a Nevada corporation
National Telecommunications of Florida, Inc., a Delaware
corporation
NTC, Inc., a Delaware corporation

LDS of Tulsa (Limited Partnership), an Oklahoma limited
partnership

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
listed below, of our report dated February 8, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Intermedia Communications Inc.
and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1998.

- - (Form S-8 no. 33-64752 and Form S-8 No. 33-97720) pertaining to the
Intermedia Communications of Florida, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan
- - (Form S-8 No. 333-03955) pertaining to the Intermedia Communications of
Florida, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan
- - (Form S-8 No. 333-32155) pertaining to the Intermedia Communications Inc.
1997 Equity Participation Plan and Stock Option Plan for the Benefit of
Employees of DIGEX, Inc.
- - (Form S-3 No. 33-99940) pertaining to the registration of warrants issued
in connection with the 13.5% Senior Notes Due 2005
- - (Form S-3 No. 333-33415) pertaining to the registration of Depositary
Shares each representing a one-hundredth interest in a share of 7% Series D
Junior Convertible Preferred Stock, 7% Series D Junior Convertible
Preferred Stock and Common Stock issuable as dividends on the 7% Series D
Junior Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock issuable upon
conversion of the Depositary Shares and 7% Series D Junior Convertible
Preferred Stock
- - (Form S-3 No. 333-42999) pertaining to the issuance of Depositary Shares
each representing a one-hundredth interest in a share of 7% Series E Junior
Convertible Preferred Stock, 7% Series E Junior Convertible Preferred Stock
and Common Stock issuable as dividends on the 7% Series E Junior
Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock issuable upon conversion of
the Depositary Shares and 7% Series E Junior Convertible Preferred Stock
- - (Form S-3 No. 333-45019) pertaining to registration of $500,000,000 of Debt
Securities, Preferred Stock, Depositary Shares and Common Stock
- - (Form S-3 No. 333-46369) pertaining to the issuance of common stock in
connection with the acquisition of the Long Distance Savers Group of
companies
- - (Form S-3 No. 333-49575) pertaining to the issuance of common stock in
connection with the acquisition of National Telecommunications of Florida,
Inc. and NTC, Inc.
- - (Form S-4 No. 333-56939) pertaining to the registration of the Company's
8.60% Series B Senior Notes due 2008
- - (Form S-3 No. 333-62931) pertaining to the issuance of Depository Shares
each representing a one-hundredth interest in a share of 7% Series F Junior
Convertible Preferred Stock, 7% Series F Junior Convertible Preferred
Stock, Common Stock issuable as dividends or liquidated damages on the 7%
Series F Junior Convertible Preferred Stock, Common Stock, and Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of the Depositary Shares and 7% Series F Junior
Convertible Preferred Stock.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
-------------------------------------
Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, Florida
February 17, 1999

<PAGE> 1

EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
listed below, of our report dated February 13, 1998, except for Note 20, as to
which the date is March 10, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Shared Technologies Fairchild Inc. and Subsidiaries included in
the amended Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Intermedia Communications Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1997.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
-------------------------------------
Ernst & Young LLP

Vienna, Virginia
February 17, 1999

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH> 395,545
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 200,748
<ALLOWANCES> 22,229
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 601,336
<PP&E> 1,607,637
<DEPRECIATION> 236,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 3,049,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 206,873
<BONDS> 2,372,386
862,288
0
<COMMON> 486
<OTHER-SE> (371,134)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 3,049,019
<SALES> 101,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 712,783
<CGS> 65,094
<TOTAL-COSTS> 468,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 14,786
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 205,760
<INCOME-PRETAX> (487,229)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (487,229)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (577,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (13.23)
<EPS-DILUTED> (13.23)

</TABLE>