<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A - 16 AND 15D - 16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE MONTH OF JULY, 1998 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-11145
BIOVAIL CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
(TRANSLATION OF REGISTRANT'S NAME INTO ENGLISH)
2488 DUNWIN DRIVE, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5L 1J9, CANADA
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES AND ZIP CODE)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (416) 285-6000
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT FILES OR WILL
FILE ANNUAL REPORTS UNDER COVER OF FORM 20-F OR FORM 40-F
FORM 20-F X FORM 40-F
--- ---
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER FOR REGISTRANT BY FURNISHING THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THIS FORM IS ALSO THEREBY FURNISHING THE INFORMATION TO THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 12G 3-2 (B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
YES NO X
--- ---
<PAGE> 2
BIOVAIL CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
The following documents issued by the Company to its shareholders in June,
1998, are attached as the indicated exhibits:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Exhibit A Notice of Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders
Exhibit B Management Information Circular
Exhibit C Proxy
Exhibit D Annual Report
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Biovail Corporation International
June 17, 1998 By /s/ Kenneth G. Howling
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT A
BIOVAIL CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JULY 10, 1998
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual and Special Meeting (the "Meeting") of
shareholders of Biovail Corporation International (the "Company") will be held
at the Royal York Hotel, Upper Canada Room, 100 Front Street West, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada, on Friday, the 10th day of July, 1998, at the hour of 10:00
o'clock in the forenoon (Toronto time) for the following purposes:
1. To receive and consider the financial statements of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 1997 and the report of the auditors thereon;
2. To appoint Deloitte & Touche, chartered accountants, as auditors of the
Company and authorize the directors of the Company to fix their
remuneration;
3. To elect directors,
4. To consider and if thought advisable, approve, with or without variation,
a special resolution amending the Articles of Amalgamation of the Company
to increase the authorized capital to a maximum of 120,000,000 common
shares. The text of such special resolution is annexed to the management
information circular accompanying this notice;
5. To consider and, if thought advisable, to pass a resolution, with or
without amendment, to approve an additional 2,500,000 shares to be
reserved for issue under the Stock Option Plan of the Company;
6. To transact such further or other business as may properly come before
the Meeting or at any adjournment thereof.
A copy of the Company's financial statements and the auditors' report to the
Shareholders of the Company for the year ended December 31, 1997, a management
information circular, a form of proxy and a return card for purposes of the
Company's supplemental mailing list accompanies this Notice.
DATED at Toronto this 1st day of June, 1998.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD
"Kenneth C. Cancellara"
Secretary
NOTE: If you are not able to be present at the meeting, kindly date, execute
and return the enclosed form of proxy in the envelope provided for the
purpose.
NOTE: To be used at the meeting, proxies must be returned to the CIBC Mellon
Trust Company at 320 Bay Street, P.O. Box 1, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 4A6
on or before the close of business on the last day preceding the day of
meeting or any adjournment thereof at which the proxy is to be used, or
delivered to the Chairman of the meeting on the day of the meeting or
any adjournment thereof prior to the time of voting.
1
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT B
BIOVAIL CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
2488 DUNWIN DRIVE
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
L5L 1J9
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
THIS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR IS FURNISHED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE MANAGEMENT OF BIOVAIL
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL (THE "COMPANY") FOR USE AT THE ANNUAL AND SPECIAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JULY 10, 1998 AND AT ANY AND ALL
ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF (THE "MEETING"). It is expected that the solicitation
will be primarily by mail, possibly supplemented by telephone or other
personal contact by regular employees of the Company. The Company may also pay
brokers, investment dealers or nominees holding common shares in their names or
in the names of their principals for their reasonable expenses in sending
solicitation material to their principals.
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any
representations other than those contained in this circular and, if given or
made, such information must not be relied upon as having been authorized.
APPOINTMENT OF PROXY
A SHAREHOLDER HAS THE RIGHT TO APPOINT A PERSON (WHO NEED NOT BE A
SHAREHOLDER OF THE COMPANY) TO ATTEND, ACT AND VOTE FOR HIM AND ON HIS BEHALF
AT THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT(S) THEREOF, OTHER THAN THE PERSONS DESIGNATED
IN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY, BY INSERTING SUCH PERSON'S NAME IN THE SPACE
PROVIDED IN THE FORM OF PROXY AND BY DELETING THE NAMES THEREIN.
All common shares (hereinafter referred to as "common shares" or "shares")
represented by properly executed proxies received by the Secretary of the
Company in a timely fashion will be voted or withheld from voting in accordance
with the instructions of the Shareholder on any ballot that may be called for
at the Meeting; if a choice is specified in respect of any matter to be acted
upon, the shares will be voted accordingly. IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH DIRECTION,
THE SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR SUCH MATTER, ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
IN THIS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR.
<PAGE> 2
THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, CONFERS DISCRETIONARY
AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO ALL AMENDMENTS OR VARIATIONS TO MATTERS IDENTIFIED IN
THE NOTICE OF MEETING OR OTHER MATTERS WHICH MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE
MEETING.
The enclosed form of proxy must be dated and executed by the Shareholder
or his/her attorney authorized in writing, or if the Shareholder is a Company,
under its corporate seal or by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof.
If the form of proxy is executed by an attorney, the authority of the attorney
to act must accompany the form of proxy. The form of proxy must be received by
the Company's Registrar and Transfer Agent, The CIBC Mellon Trust Company at
320 Bay Street, P.O. Box 1, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 4A6 on or before the close of
business of the last day preceding the day of the meeting or any adjournment
thereof at which the proxy is to be used, or delivered to the Chairman of the
meeting on the day of the meeting or any adjournment thereof prior to the time
of voting.
REVOCATION OF PROXIES
Pursuant to Section 110(4) of the Business Corporations Act, 1990
(Ontario), any Shareholder giving a proxy may revoke a proxy by instrument in
writing executed by the Shareholder or by his/her attorney authorized in
writing, or if the Shareholder is a Company, under the corporate seal or by a
duly authorized officer or attorney thereof and deposited at the Company's
Registrar and Transfer Agent, The CIBC Mellon Trust Company at 320 Bay Street,
P.O. Box 1, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 4A6 on or before the close of business of the
last day preceding the day of the meeting or any adjournment thereof at which
the proxy is to be used, or deliver it to the Chairman of the meeting on the
day of the meeting or any adjournment thereof prior to the time of voting or in
any other manner permitted by law.
All matters to be submitted to the Shareholders at the Meeting, unless
otherwise stated herein, require for approval a favourable majority of the
votes cast by the holders of common shares of the Company at the Meeting.
INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON
Except as set out herein and except insofar as they may be shareholders of
the Company, no director or officer of the Company or any proposed nominee of
management of the Company for election as a director of the Company, nor any
associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons has any material interest,
direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership or otherwise, in matters to
be acted upon at the Meeting.
2
<PAGE> 3
COMMON SHARES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDER THEREOF
The holders of common shares of the Company will be entitled to vote at
the Meeting on all matters. Pursuant to Section 100(2) of the Business
Corporations Act, 1990 (Ontario) and in accordance with National Policy
Statement No. 41 adopted by the Ontario Securities Commission, each holder of a
common share of the Company at the close of business on June 1, 1998 (the
"Record Date") is entitled to one (1) vote for each such share held, except to
the extent that such shares may have been transferred after the Record Date and
the transferee produces properly endorsed share certificates or otherwise
establishes that he/she owns the shares and demands, not later than ten (10)
days before the Meeting, that the Company's Transfer Agent, The The CIBC Mellon
Trust Company at 320 Bay Street, P.O. Box 1, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 4A6, include
his/her name on the list of Shareholders. As at June 1, 1998, 27,120,950
common shares of the Company were issued and outstanding.
To the knowledge of the directors and senior officers of the Company, the
following was, at June 1, 1998, the only person who beneficially owns, directly
or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over common shares of the
Company carrying more than ten percent of the voting rights attached to all
common shares of the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Approximate Number
of Common Shares
Beneficially Owned,
Directly or
Indirectly,
or over which Percentage of
Control or Outstanding
Direction is Common Shares
Name of Shareholder Executed Represented
<S> <C> <C>
Eugene Melnyk 6,746,437 24.9%
</TABLE>
PARTICULARS OF ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON
1. APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
Deloitte & Touche were first appointed the Auditors of the Company on
April 6, 1992.
UNLESS A PROXY SPECIFIES THAT THE SHARES IT REPRESENTS SHOULD BE WITHHELD
FROM VOTING IN THE REAPPOINTMENT OF THE EXISTING AUDITORS, THE POTENTIAL
PROXYHOLDERS NAMED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY INTEND TO VOTE FOR THE
REAPPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE AS AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY TO HOLD OFFICE
UNTIL THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING AT A REMUNERATION TO BE FIXED BY THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY.
3
<PAGE> 4
2. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The current Board of Directors of the Company consists of eight (8)
directors. Management proposes that the number of Directors on the Board be
maintained at eight (8) all of whom are nominated and listed below.
UNLESS A PROXY SPECIFIES THAT THE SHARES IT REPRESENTS SHOULD BE WITHHELD
FROM VOTING IN THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, THE PROXYHOLDERS NAMED IN THE
ACCOMPANYING PROXY INTEND TO VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES,
ALL OF WHOM ARE NOW DIRECTORS AND HAVE BEEN SINCE THE DATES INDICATED.
Management does not contemplate that any nominee will be unable to serve
as a director, but, if such an event should occur for any reason prior to the
Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy reserve the right to
vote for another nominee in their discretion, unless authority to vote the
proxy for the election of directors has been withheld. Each Director elected
will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his
successor is duly elected, unless the office is earlier vacated in accordance
with the by-laws of the Company.
The Company does not have an Executive Committee of its Board of
Directors, but is required pursuant to Section 158(1) of the Business
Corporations Act, 1990 (Ontario) to have, and does have, an Audit Committee
comprised of Messrs. Wilfred G. Bristow, Roger Rowan and Eugene N. Melnyk.
The following table and notes thereto state the names of all persons
proposed to be nominated for election as directors, all offices with the
Company currently held by them, their principal occupation or employment, the
year in which they became directors of the Company, and the approximate number
of common shares of the Company beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or
over which control or direction is exercised by each of them as at June 1,
1998:
4
<PAGE> 5
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES BENEFICIALLY
OWNED, DIRECTLY OR
PRESENT PRINCIPAL INDIRECTLY OR OVER
OCCUPATION OR WHICH CONTROL OR
EMPLOYMENT; POSITION DIRECTION IS
NAME, ADDRESS WITH COMPANY BECAME DIRECTOR EXERCISED (1)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Eugene N. Melnyk (2) Chairman of the Board of Directors 1994 6,746,437
Barbados, WI of the Company
Bruce Brydon Chief Executive Officer of the Company 1995 18,000
Milton, Ontario
Robert Podruzny President and Chief Operating Officer 1997 27,600
Scarborough, Ontario of the Company
Kenneth C. Cancellara Senior Vice President and General 1995 31,800
Toronto, Ontario Counsel of the Company
Rolf Reininghaus Senior Vice-President of the Company 1994 190,066
Mississauga, Ontario
Wilfred G. Bristow (2) Senior Vice-President, Nesbitt Burns
Campbellville, Ontario Inc. (investment banking firm) 1994 5,000
Roger Rowan, (2) President and Chief Operating Officer 1997 894,825
Toronto, Ontario Watt Charmichael Inc. (investment
banking firm)
Robert Vujea, President, R&D Chemical Corporation 1997 26,400
Michigan, USA
</TABLE>
(1) Information furnished by respective nominees.
(2) Member of the Audit Committee.
3. PROPOSED INCREASE OF AUTHORIZED CAPITAL
The Board or Directors of the Company has resolved that it would be in
the best interests of the Company to increase its existing authorized share
capital from 60,000,000 to a mazimum of 120,000,000 common shares. Under
applicable law, in order to effect such amendment, it is necessary to receive
the approval of the shareholders, with or without variation, by way of a
special resolution (the "Special Resolution") concerning such amendment. The
text of the Special Resolution is annexed to this Management Information
Circular as Schedule "A".
5
<PAGE> 6
UNLESS A PROXYHOLDER SPECIFIES THAT THOSE SHARES REPRESENTED BY IT SHOULD
BE VOTED AGAINST THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL RESOLUTION, SUCH PROXYHOLDER SHALL
VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL RESOLUTION. In order to be effective, the
special resolution must be approved by not less than two-thirds of the
shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.
4. INCREASE OF NUMBER OF SHARES RESERVED UNDER STOCK OPTION PLAN
As at December 31, 1997, the Company has granted options to subscribe for
an aggregate of 2,520,000 common shares under its Stock Option Plan. The
Board of Directors has resolved that it is in the best interests of the Company
to increase the number of shares reserved under its Stock Option Plan from
4,500,000 to 7,000,000 common shares representing approximately 25.8% of the
total number of common shares currently issued and outstanding. The increase
in the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Stock Option Plan will
provide the Board of Directors with increased flexibility in providing non-cash
compensation to eligible directors, officers, employees, consultants and
advisors.
UNLESS A PROXYHOLDER SPECIFIES THAT THOSE SHARES REPRESENTED BY IT SHOULD
BE VOTED AGAINST THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE COMPANY'S STOCK OPTION PLAN, SUCH
PROXYHOLDERS SHALL VOTE IN FAVOUR OF SUCH RESOLUTION. In order to be
effective, such resolution must be approved by not less than a majority of
those shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation information for each of
the last three financial years for the Chief Executive Officer and the four
other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company who served as
executive officers at the end of 1997 ("Named Executive Officers"):
6
<PAGE> 7
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation
Other
Annual Compen-
Name and Principal Salary Bonus sation (2)
Position Year (U.S.$) (U.S.$) (U.S.$)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Eugene N. Melnyk 1997 377,463 - -
Chairman of the Board 1996 343,148 - -
1995 313,969 - -
Bruce D. Brydon (1) 1997 232,805 20,970 -
Chief Executive Officer 1996 131,328 - -
1995 113,480 - -
Robert A. Podruzny(1) 1997 126,895 15,937 -
President, Chief 1996 107,912 - -
Operating Officer 1995 - - -
Kenneth Cancellara (1) 1997 183,138 - -
Senior Vice President 1996 150,718 - -
and General Counsel 1995 - - -
Rolf Reininghaus (1) 1997 134,577 10,654 -
Senior Vice-President 1996 131,784 - -
1995 131,800 11,089 -
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Long Term Compensation
Awards Payments
Securities Restricted
Under Shares or Restricted LTIP All Other
Name and Principal Options ShareUnits Payouts Compensation (2)
Postion Year Granted (3) (#) (U.S.$) (U.S.$) (U.S.$)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Eugene N. Melnyk 1997 810,000 - 23,488,158 -
Chairman of the Board 1996 - - - -
1995 345,000 - - -
Bruce D. Brydon (1) 1997 - - 453,751 -
Chief Executive Officer 1996 - - - -
1995 270,000 - 287,279 -
Robert A. Podruzny(1) 1997 42,000 - - -
President, Chief 1996 24,000 - - -
Operating Officer 1995 - - - -
Kenneth Cancellara (1) 1997 - - - -
Senior Vice President 1996 - - - -
and General Counsel 1995 210,000 - 160,640 -
Rolf Reininghaus (1) 1997 - - - -
Senior Vice-President 1996 - - - -
1995 105,000 - - -
</TABLE>
(1) The amount of compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers, was
determined and paid by the Company. Other than Mr. Melnyk these amounts
were paid in Canadian dollars and, for the purposes of this table,
converted to U.S. dollars at the respective year end rates of exchange as
follows: 1997 - .6990; 1996 - .7296; and 1995 - .7332.
(2) Perquisites and other personal benefits for Named Executive Officers
did not exceed the minimum threshold disclosure level in 1997.
(3) The options were granted under the Company's Stock Option Plan, as
amended, established in 1993. All options are for the purchase of common
shares of the Company and are for a term of 5 years. The options become
exercisable as to a maximum of 33 1/3% on each of the first, second and
third anniversaries of the date of grant, based on the achievement of
predetermined benchmarks, except for 120,000 options granted to Mr. Melnyk
on January 15, 1995, which become exercisable on the second anniversary
date of the grant.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
Under the Company's Stock Option Plan, as amended, (the "Plan")
established in 1993 and approved by the shareholders at the Special Meeting
held on March 28, 1994, the Company may grant to directors, officers, key
employees, consultants and advisors, options to purchase Common Shares of the
Company. The purpose of the Plan is to provide incentives to certain of the
Company's directors, officers, key employees, consultants and advisors. The
aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan shall not
exceed 4,500,000
7
<PAGE> 8
Common Shares (subject to amendment at the Meeting). The number of shares
reserved for issuance to any one person under the Plan together with shares
which that person may acquire under any similar plan of the Company may not
exceed 5% of the outstanding issue. Without obtaining the necessary
shareholder approvals required by the Toronto Stock Exchange, the Plan
(together with any other share compensation arrangement) may not, at any time,
result in the number of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to stock options
granted to insiders exceeding 10% of the outstanding issue or the issuance to
insiders, within a one year period, of a number of shares exceeding 10% of the
outstanding issue. Under the Plan, the Company designates the maximum number
of shares that are subject to an option. The exercise price per share of an
option is the market value of the share at the date of grant.
As at December 31, 1997, the Company has granted options to subscribe for
up to 2,520,000 shares at exercise prices ranging from CDN $1.00 to U.S. $34.50
per share.
The following tables provide information respresenting those options
granted and exercised as at the end of 1997 by the Named Executive Officers:
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Market Value of
Securities
Underlying Options
Securities Under % of Total Options on the Date of
Options Granted Granted to Exercise Price Grant
Name # (1) Employees in Period (U.S. $/Security) (U.S.$/Security) Expiration Date
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Eugene Melnyk 810,000 68.7% 31.00 30.88 November 28, 2002
Bruce Brydon - - - - -
Robert Podruzny 42,000 3.6% 30.00 30.00 July 02, 2002
Kenneth Cancellara - - - - -
Rolf Reininghaus - - - - -
</TABLE>
(1) The options were granted under the Company's Stock Option Plan, as
amended, established in 1993. All options are for the purchase of Common
Shares of the Company and are for a term of 5 years. The options become
exercisable as to a maximum of 33 1/3% on March 1st of 1999, 2000, 2001,
respectively based on the achievement of predetermined benchmarks.
8
<PAGE> 9
AGGREGATE OPTIONS EXERCISED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Value of
Unexercised
in-the-Money
Unexercised Options Optioins Fiscal
Securities at Fiscal Year-End Year-End
Acquired on Exercisable/ Exercisable/
Exercise Aggregate Value Unexercisable Unexercisable (1)
Name (#) Realized (U.S.$) (#) (U.S.$)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Eugene Melnyk 810,000 23,488,158 75,000/960,000 1,429,500/10,197,600
Bruce Brydon 18,000 453,751 72,000/150,000 2,636,640/2,859,000
Robert A. Podruzny - - 8,000/58,000 152,480/685,480
Kenneth C. Cancellara - - 140,200/50,000 3,318,623/953,000
Rolf Reininghaus - - 215,000/70,000 7,325,930/1,334,200
</TABLE>
(1) Value of unexercised in-the-money options calculated using the closing
price of common shares of the Company, on the New York Stock Exchange on
December 31, 1997 (U.S. $39.06), less the exercise price of in-the-money
options.
INDEBTEDNESS OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In 1997, the Company authorized the making of a loan to an executive
officer of the Company, the loan bears interest at 1/4% over the bank prime
rate equal to the Company's rate for borrowing. This loan and all outstanding
interest was repaid to the Company in January, 1998.
In 1996, the Company authorized the making of loans to its Chairman and
executive officers, as named in the table set forth below to finance the
acquisition of shares of the Company on the open market. These loans are
secured by such shares and bear interest at 1/4% over the bank prime rate,
equal to the Company's rate of borrowing. The loans are due on the earlier of
termination of employment or December 1, 1998. The following table contains
particulars of outstanding indebtedness of the Named Executive Officers:
9
<PAGE> 10
TABLE OF INDEBTEDNESS
UNDER EXECUTIVE SECURITIES PURCHASE PROGRAM
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Largest Amount Amount Outstanding
Involvement of Outstanding during as at June Financially Assisted
Name and Principal Issuer or 1997 1, 1998 Securities Purchased Security for
Position Subsidiary (U.S. $) (U.S. $) (#) Indebtedness
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Eugene N. Melnyk Lender 665,408 741,846 24,000 24,000
Chairman of the Board common shares
Robert A. Podruzny Lender 665,408 688,383 22,350 22,350
President, and Chief common shares
Operating Officer
Kenneth C. Cancellara Lender 665,408 688,383 22,350 22,350
Senior Vice common shares
President and
General Counsel
Rolf Reininghaus Lender 665,408 688,383 22,350 22,350
Senior Vice President common shares
</TABLE>
10
<PAGE> 11
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in the
cumulative shareholder return on the Company's common shares compared to the
cumulative total return of the Toronto Stock Exchange 300 Index for the past
five years, assuming CDN $100 investment on December 31, 1992:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As at December 31, 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Biovail Common 100.00 104.76 204.76 1,955.24 1,957.33 3,089.06
TSE 300 Index 100.00 132.55 132.31 151.54 194.49 223.62
</TABLE>
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Company does not have a compensation committee. The duties of such a
committee are carried out by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors
meets on compensation matters as and when required with respect to executive
compensation.
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
It is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to determine the level
of compensation in respect of the Company's senior executives with a view to
providing such executives with a competitive compensation package having regard
to performance. Performance is defined to include achievement of the
corporate, divisional and personal objectives and enhancement of shareholder
value through increases in the stock price resulting from increases in sales
revenue, cost efficient production and enhanced annual cash flow.
11
<PAGE> 12
Compensation for executive officers is composed primarily of three
components; namely, base salary, performance bonuses and the granting of stock
options. Performance bonuses are considered from time to time having regard to
the above referenced objectives.
In establishing the levels of base salary, the award of stock options and
performance bonuses the Board of Directors takes into consideration individual
performance, responsibilities, length of service and levels of compensation
provided by industry competitors.
PLANS
The Company does not have any plan pursuant to which cash or non-cash
compensation was paid or distributed to executive officers during the most
recently completed financial year or pursuant to which cash or non-cash
compensation is proposed to be paid or distributed to executive officers in a
future year, other than the option agreements described under the headings
"Stock Option Plan" and "Remuneration of Directors".
At the special meeting of shareholders held on January 2, 1996, the
shareholders of the Company approved an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
"ESPP"). The purpose of the ESPP is to provide a convenient method for
full-time employees, consultants and advisors of the Company or any of its
direct or indirect subsidiaries to participate in the share ownership of the
Company or to increase their share ownership in the Company. Under the ESPP,
the board of directors of the Company may fix certain dates during which the
Company will offer to eligible employees an opportunity to purchase common
shares of the Company via payroll or contractual deduction. The maximum
discount from the market price at which participants may purchase shares under
the ESPP is ten percent (10%).
The total number of shares that may be issued under the ESPP shall not
exceed 300,000 common shares. At the discretion of a committee of the Board of
Directors that will administer the ESPP, the Company may issue shares directly
from treasury or purchase shares in the market from time to time to satisfy its
obligations under the ESPP. All eligible participants of the Company that meet
certain minimum criteria are eligible to participate under the ESPP. A
participant may authorize a payroll or contractual deduction of up to a maximum
of 10% of the base salary or remuneration to be received during any purchase
period. Each participant may purchase ccommon shares of the Company as the
participant's contributions permit. The purchase price shall be 90% of the
fair market value per share of stock on the date on which the period ends.
Directors, senior officers or insiders of the Company and their respective
associates are not eligible to participate in the ESPP.
DIRECTORS' AND OFFICERS' LIABILITY INSURANCE
The Company maintains insurance for the benefit of its directors and
officers against certain liabilities incurred by them in their capacity as
directors or officers of the Company or its subsidiaries in the aggregate
amount of $10,000,000. The policy governing such insurance is subject to
standard exclusions and limitations. During the 1997 fiscal year the amount of
the premiums paid in respect of such insurance was $28,750.
12
<PAGE> 13
REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS
Certain directors who are not officers or employees of the Company
receive an annual fee of $2,900 and a participation fee of $370 for each
meeting of the Board of Directors attended. All directors are reimbursed for
expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of Directors meetings.
Directors also have been granted stock options pursuant to the terms of the
Company's Stock Option Plan. During 1997, two of the directors who were not
officers of the Company were each granted options to subscribe for up to
30,000 shares at $30.00 per share.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Eugene Melnyk, as Chairman of the Board of the Company, pursuant to a
Management Agreement, effective February 1, 1992, receives annual compensation
for services, which amount is subject to 10% annual increases during the term
of the Management Agreement, and is reimbursed for business related expenses.
The Management Agreement will continue automatically for renewal periods of one
year unless terminated by either party upon prior written notice.
Bruce Brydon, as Chief Executive Officer and Director, pursuant to an
Employment Agreement made as of December 31, 1996, receives an annual salary
as well as reimbursement of business related expenses and an automobile
allowance which has a two year term expiring in December, 1998.
Robert Podruzny, President, Chief Operating Officer and Director, pursuant
to an Employment Agreement made as of January 8, 1996, receives an annual
salary subject to a cost of living adjustment, reimbursement of business
expenses and an automobile allowance during the term of the Employment
Agreement which has a term of five years, expiring in March, 2001, and
thereafter is terminable by the Company, and/or Mr. Podruzny upon three months'
written notice.
Kenneth Cancellara, as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Director, pursuant to an Employment Agreement made as of January 10, 1996,
receives an annual salary subject to a cost of living adjustment, reimbursement
of business expenses and an automobile allowance during the term of the
Employment Agreement which has a term of five years, expiring in March, 2001
and thereafter is terminable by the Company upon six months' written notice and
is terminable by Mr. Cancellara upon 90 days' prior notice.
Rolf Reininghaus, as Senior Vice President and Director, pursuant to an
Employment Agreement made as of February 1, 1992, as amended, receives an
annual salary subject to a cost of living adjustment, a bonus at the
discretion of the Board of Directors, as well as reimbursement of business
expenses and an automobile allowance
13
<PAGE> 14
during the term of the Employment Agreement, which is terminable by the
Company upon one year's written notice and is terminable by Mr. Reininghaus
upon two months' prior written notice.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In 1995, the Company's previously existing, contractual, legal and
financial relationships with its former licensee, Hoechst-Roussel
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Hoechst") were resolved. Hoechst was previously
licensed by the Company for the once-daily controlled release formulation of
diltiazem. As a result of Hoechst's acquisition of Marion Merrell Dow Inc., a
competitor of the Company, the Rights Agreement between the Company and Hoechst
was terminated effective June 30, 1995, resulting in a gain to the Company of
$3,617,000, net of legal and other expenses relating to the settlement.
In 1996, Biovail entered into a Settlement Agreement with Elan Corporation
plc. ("Elan") which resolved all claims and counterclaims made in litigation
with respect to alleged patent infringement by Biovail of Elan's
controlled-release patents for the drug delivery system employed in Cardizem
CD. Such settlement agreement requires the payment of royalties by Biovail to
Elan on U.S. sales of Tiazac(R) and on U.S. sales of any generic version of
Cardizem CD introduced by Biovail and payments by Elan to Biovail on U.S. sales
of Verelan. Pursuant to such settlement agreement, Biovail expects to be able
to seek to introduce a generic version of Cardizem CD, free of patent
infringement litigation by Elan. Furthermore, pursuant to such settlement
agreement, Elan is precluded in substance from commencing a lawsuit for patent
infringement of its generic version of Verelan. However, Elan's exclusive
licensee has commenced a patent infringement suit on behalf of such licensee
and Elan which alleges that Biovail's filing of its ANDA for a generic version
of Verelan infringes one claim of the patent covering Verelan. If successful,
that suit could delay Biovail's marketing of its Verelan generic product.
Biovail is vigorously defending such suit and has counterclaimed alleging that
Elan's licensee has violated the anti-trust laws of the United States by filing
a frivolous suit in an attempt to maintain market exclusivity. In addition,
Biovail has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment seeking an order from the court
that its ANDA does not infringe that patent.
In January, 1998, Andrx Pharmaceutical, Inc. ("Andrx") commenced action
against the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), the Company and Faulding
Inc., seeking an order from the Court which would preclude the FDA from
approving any subsequently-filed ANDAs, including the Company's filed ANDA for
a generic version of Cardizem CD until Andrx receives 180 days of market
exclusivity based on its status as the first to file for approval of such a
product. The Company has asserted affirmative defenses based upon the
Company's status as an unsued ANDA submitter and counter-sued Andrx for
anti-trust laws based on the filing of this suit and Andrx' entry into an
alleged collusive agreement with Hoechst Marion Roussel relating to Andrx'
generic Cardizem CD which could result in keeping generic competition from
entering the marketplace in a regular and timely manner.
14
<PAGE> 15
In March, 1998, the Company commenced an action in the District of New
Jersey against Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft and related parties to recover damages
estimated at $1.2 billion and for injunctive relief for the alleged violation by
the defendants of the anti-trust laws of the United States, for breach of
contract, deceptive trade practices and restraint of trade, unfair competition
and other violations of the common law. A reasonable estimation of the
Company's potential recovery for damages cannot be made at this time.
From time to time, the Company becomes involved in various legal
proceedings which it considers to be in the ordinary course of business. The
vast majority of these proceedings involve intellectual property issues that
often result in patent infringement suits brought by patent holders upon the
Company's filing of its ANDA applications. The timing of these actions is
mandated by statute and may result in a delay of FDA's approval for such filed
ANDAs until the final resolution of such actions or the expiry of 30 months,
whichever occurs earlier.
The Company is currently litigating two separate actions for alleged
infringement of the applicable patents related to the Company's filing of ANDAs
for the generic equivalent of Adalat CC (30mg) and Procardia XL (30mg and 60mg)
products. Both actions make a technical claim of infringement and, by virtue
of applicable statutory provisions, the filing of these suits may delay
approval of the Company's ANDAs for a period of 30 months or resolutions of
these patent infringement questions, whichever occurs sooner. The Company is
vigorously defending these suits by denying infringement of the patents. In
addition, the Company has brought an action against the patent holders seeking
declaratory judgement and invalidity of the relevant patent and seeking damages
for violation of the anti-trust laws and for tortious interference with the
Company's prospective business advantage.
STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
The principles set out below contain a description of the Company's
corporate governance practices, as approved by the Board of Directors. The
Board of Directors of the Company believes that a clearly defined system of
corporate governance is essential to the effective and efficient operation of
the Company. The system of corporate governance should reflect the Company's
particular circumstances, having always as its ultimate objective the best
long-term interests of the Company and the enhancement of value for all
shareholders.
MANDATE OF THE BOARD
There is no specific written mandate of the Board of Directors of the
Company, other than the corporate standard of care set out in the governing
corporate legislation of the Company, the Business Corporation Act, 1990
(Ontario) (the "OBCA"). The OBCA states that each director and officer of a
corporation, in exercising his or her powers and discharging his or her duties,
shall act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best
15
<PAGE> 16
interests of the Company and exercise the care, diligence and skill that a
reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. The
Board of Directors of the Company assumes responsibility for stewardship of the
Company, including:
(a) adoption of a strategic planning process;
(b) the identification of the principal risks of the Company's business
and ensuring the implementation of appropriate systems
to manage these risks;
(c) success planning, including appointing, training and monitoring senior
management
(d) a communications policy for the Company; and
(e) the integrity of the Company's internal control and management
information systems.
Although the Board of Directors supervises, directs and oversees the
business and affairs of the Company, it delegates the day-to-day management to
the Company's executive officers, while reserving the ability to intervene in
management decisions and to exercise final judgment on any matter.
In order to carry out the foregoing responsibilities the Board of
Directors meets quarterly and otherwise as required by circumstances.
COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD
The Board of Directors of the Company consists of (eight) individuals,
five of whom are officers of the Company and as such, may be considered to be
"related" directors. The remaining directors are free from any interest and
any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be
perceived to, materially interfere with the director's ability to act with a
view to the best interests of the Company, other than interests and
relationships arising from shareholding. The Company believes that this 33.3%
representation by unrelated directors is adequate to present a point of view
independent of management. Each of the nominated directors of the Company has
a minority shareholding interest in the Company, as set out under the heading
"Election of Directors". Management is of the view that minority shareholders
are adequately represented on the Board of Directors.
16
<PAGE> 17
The Company and its Board operate in such a way that efficiency is created
by the consideration of certain matters directly by the Board instead of by
Board committees. The Company believes that the nature of the relationships of
the related directors of the Board would not adversely affect their
independence or ability to act in the best interests of Company.
The members of the Company's audit committee are Eugene Melnyk (related
director), Wilfred Bristow (unrelated director) and Roger Rowan (unrelated
director). The Company's audit committee is appointed by the Board of
Directors annually. The audit committee meets as required with management and
the independent auditors to satisfy itself that management and the independent
auditors are each properly discharging their responsibilities. The audit
committee, among other things, reviews matters related to the quality of audits
and financial reporting and maintains practices intended to preserve the
independence of the Company's auditors. The independent auditors have the
right to request a meeting with the audit committee at any time. The audit
committee reviews the financial statements, the independent auditors' report,
the annual and quarterly reports to the shareholders, as well as any public
disclosure document which contains financial information and reports thereon to
the Board of Directors prior to the Board approving such information for public
disclosure.
DECISIONS REQUIRING PRIOR BOARD APPROVAL
The Board monitors management on a regular basis. Management of the
Company is aware of the need to obtain Board approval for significant corporate
or business transactions outside of the normal course of business. The annual
budget is reviewed regularly by the Board of Directors as a key roadmap to
assess performance and progress. Decisions which would affect the budget
require prior board approval. This procedure is favoured over the use of
formal mandates which may serve to inhibit management initiatives. Less
significant activities which can be addressed by management are often reported
to the Board of Directors, with whom management has a good working
relationship.
RECRUITMENT OF NEW DIRECTORS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCING MEASURES
There are no formal procedures in place for recruiting new directors or to
address other performance enhancing measures. The size of the Board, the
nature of the business conducted by the Company and the familiarity of all
Board members with the business are such that the directors believe that a less
formal approach is adequate.
To date, due to the size and nature of the Company, the Board has not
constituted a committee composed exclusively of outside directors, a majority
of whom are unrelated directors, to assess the effectiveness of the Board as a
whole, the committees of the Board and the contributions of individual
directors.
17
<PAGE> 18
SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK AND CONCERNS
The Company is dedicated to the maintenance of good shareholder relations
and attempts to deal with any expressed concerns of shareholders in an
effective and timely manner. In particular, the Company takes special efforts
to ensure that all legal and stock exchange requirements are addressed in a
timely and effective manner. The Company has few concerns or complaints
expressed to it by shareholders, but attempts to deal with any concerns or
complaints that it does receive effectively, in an informal manner.
BOARD EXPECTATIONS OF MANAGEMENT
The Board of Directors expects management to operate the business in
accordance with the mandate referred to above and to achieve maximum
shareholder value, consistent with public and employee safety and the other
objectives referred to above. The results of the management activities are
reviewed on a continuous basis by the Board.
OUTSIDE ADVISORS
The Board has not adopted a system which would enable an individual
director to engage an outside adviser at the expense of the Company in
appropriate circumstances.
Given the considerations noted above, the Company's approach to corporate
governance differs in certain respects from the proposed guidelines for
effective corporate goveranance of The Toronto Stock Exchange (the
"Guidelines"). The Board of Directors believes that the existing corporate
governance structure is appropriate in the circumstances and the Company is in
the process of examining its own requirements and procedures in order to
determine the appropriateness of its current systems and procedures in the
context of the Guidelines.
MISCELLANEOUS
The management of the Company knows of no amendments, variations or other
matters which are likely to be brought before the Meeting. HOWEVER, IF ANY
AMENDMENTS, VARIATIONS, OR OTHER MATTERS OF WHICH THE MANAGEMENT IS NOT NOW
AWARE ARE PROPERLY PRESENTED TO THE MEETING, IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE PERSONS
NAMED IN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY TO VOTE SAID PROXIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THEIR JUDGEMENT ON SUCH MATTERS.
18
<PAGE> 19
The undersigned hereby certifies that the contents herein, and the sending
hereof, have been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company for mailing
to the shareholders, directors and auditors of the Company.
Non-registered shareholders who wish to be placed on the Company's
supplemental mailing list for interim reports are also requested to complete,
sign and return the enclosed request form to The CIBC Mellon Trust Company.
Dated at Toronto this 1st day of June, 1998.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
"Kenneth C. Cancellara "
Secretary
<PAGE> 20
SCHEDULE A
FORM OF SPECIAL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED CAPITAL
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Company file Articles of Amendment increasing its authorized
capital from 60,000,000 common shares to a maximum of 120,000,000 common
shares;
2. That any director or officer be and he is hereby authorized to file such
Articles of Amendment and generally take such further acts or execute such
additional documentation as is necessary or desirable in order to give
effect to the foregoing resolution;
3. The directors of the Company may revoke the foregoing resolution without
further approval of the shareholders at any time prior to the endorsement
of a Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of the Company in respect of
the foregoing amendment.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT C
BIOVAIL CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
PROXY FOR ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF MANAGEMENT
The undersigned shareholder of Biovail Corporation International hereby
appoints Eugene Melnyk, Chairman of the Board of Directors, whom failing,
Bob Podruzny, President and Chief Operating Officer, whom failing, Kenneth
C. Cancellara, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, whom failing
__________ , as nominee of the undersigned to attend and act for and on
behalf of the undersigned at the annual and special meeting of the
shareholders of the Company to be held on July 10, 1998 and at any
adjournment(s) thereof and without limiting the general authority and power
hereby given to such nominee, the shares represented by this proxy are
specifically directed to be voted as indicted on the reverse side of this
proxy.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AND WHERE A
CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED AS
DIRECTED. WHERE NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED,
THIS PROXY WILL CONFER DISCRETIONARY
AUTHORITY AND WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOUR OF
THE MATTERS REFERRED TO ON THE REVERSE
SIDE HEREOF.
THIS PROXY ALSO CONFERS DISCRETIONARY
AUTHORITY TO VOTE IN RESPECT OF ANY OTHER
MATTER WHICH MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE
MEETING AND IN SUCH MANNER AS SUCH NOMINEE
IN HIS JUDGMENT MAY DETERMINE.
A SHAREHOLDER HAS THE RIGHT TO APPOINT A
PERSON TO ATTEND AND ACT FOR HIM AND ON
HIS BEHALF AT THE MEETING OTHER THAN THE
PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THIS FORM OF PROXY.
SUCH RIGHT MAY BE EXERCISED BY FILLING THE
NAME OF SUCH PERSON IN THE BLANK SPACE
PROVIDED AND STRIKING OUT THE NAMES OF
MANAGEMENT'S NOMINEES ABOVE.
DATED THIS DAY OF , 1998.
---------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER
---------------------------------------------
NAME OF SHAREHOLDER (PRINT)
---------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF SHARES
(SEE OVER)
<PAGE> 2
NOTE:
1. A person appointed as nominee to represent a shareholder need not be a
shareholder.
2. Where this proxy is signed by a company, its corporate seal must be
affixed.
VOTE [ ] 1. For the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, Chartered
Accountants, as the auditors of the Company and
WITHHOLD [ ] authorizing the directors to fix remuneration.
VOTE
VOTE [ ] 2. For the election of directors nominated by management
as set forth in the accompanying Management
WITHHOLD [ ] Information Circular.
VOTE
FOR [ ] 3. Approval of a special resolution to amend the Articles
of Amalgamation of the Company to increase the
AGAINST [ ] authorized capital to a maximum of 120,000,000 common
shares.
FOR [ ] 4. Approval of a resolution to approve an additional
2,500,000 shares to be reserved under the Stock Option
AGAINST [ ] Plan of the Company.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT D
BIOVAIL
1997 Annual Report
<PAGE> 2
CORPORATE PROFILE
Biovail Corporation International is an international full service
pharmaceutical company, engaged in the formulation, clinical testing,
registration and manufacture of drug products utilizing advanced drug delivery
technologies.
Biovail applies its proprietary drug delivery technologies to drug compounds
that are free of patent protection to develop both branded and generic
controlled-release products. These controlled-released products improve on
existing formulations and provide therapeutic, pharmacoeconomic and other
benefits inherent in controlled-release products.
As a fully integrated company, Biovail provides proven expertise and resources
in all stages of the development, formulation, clinical testing, regulatory
filing and manufacture of products. The Company operates state-of-the-art
research and development and manufacturing facilities in both Manitoba, Canada
and Puerto Rico.
Biovail's products are marketed worldwide through out-licensing agreements and
strategic partnerships with some of the world's leading pharmaceutical
companies. At present, Biovail's products are sold in more than 55 countries,
including the U.S., Canada, the European Community (EC), South America and
Australia.
The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Crystaal Corporation, markets branded
products in Canada developed by Biovail, as well as products in-licensed
through marketing alliances with strategic partners. Crystaal's mandate is to
expand its portfolio and presence in the Canadian marketplace.
Operations also include Biovail Contract Research, which provides clinical and
laboratory services to third party pharmaceutical companies, as well as to
Biovail.
Biovail is dedicated to ongoing research and development. Its strategy is to
develop and maintain a strong product portfolio of both generic and branded
controlled-release pharmaceutical products. Biovail currently has several key
products filed for approval and many other promising products in late-stage
development. In addition, the Company has established a strong research
program to ensure the ongoing development of branded controlled-release
products.
Biovail's corporate headquarters is located in Toronto, Canada. Biovail
Corporation International's common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange
and the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "BVF".
<PAGE> 3
INDEX
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS.......................... 2
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS........................ 3-6
CURRENT PRODUCTS.............................. 8-11
BIOVAIL CONTRACT RESEARCH..................... 12
MANUFACTURING................................. 13
CRYSTAAL CORPORATION.......................... 14
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT........................ 15
BIOVAIL PIPELINE.............................. 16-18
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS............. 19-24
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT.......................... 25
AUDITOR'S REPORT.............................. 26
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS................... 27
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
AND RETAINED EARNINGS [DEFICIT]............... 28
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS......... 29
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.... 30-43
COMMON SHARE INFORMATION...................... 44
CORPORATE INFORMATION......................... inside back cover
</TABLE>
All dollar amounts contained in this report are in U.S. dollars,
unless otherwise stated.
<PAGE> 4
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
[ALL DOLLAR AMOUNTS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA ARE EXPRESSED
IN THOUSANDS OF U.S. DOLLARS]
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA
Revenue $19,644 $66,430 $82,379
Research and
Development Expense 7,194 10,901 14,386
Net Income Before
Unusual Items 2,253 23,284 35,241
EPS Before Unusual Items 0.09 0.92 1.38
Net Income 5,870 23,284 35,241
EPS 0.23 0.92 1.38
FINANCIAL POSITION
Working Capital $696 $9,606 $47,663
Total Assets 60,867 58,606 93,739
Long-term Debt 10,195 6,968 4,847
Shareholders' Equity 14,592 36,943 75,458
Current Ratio 1.0:1 1.6:1 4.1:1
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.70:1 0.19:1 0.06:1
OTHER DATA
Number of Employees 250 315 377
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding 24,993,000 25,378,000 25,606,000
</TABLE>
THREE YEAR TREND ANALYSIS SELECTED DATA
[GRAPH]
<PAGE> 5
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
The past year has been one full of considerable challenges and opportunities
for Biovail. I am very pleased to report that your Company has successfully met
these challenges and taken full advantage of the opportunities. The result has
been a very exciting and rewarding 12 months which has seen Biovail reach new
levels of success and lay the groundwork for additional, sustainable growth and
profitability.
In the past year Biovail achieved record revenues and net income, and finished
the year in a strong financial position. The Company further strengthened its
position as one of the world's leading controlled-release pharmaceutical
development companies. Our accomplishments in 1997 have been many, and we have
made tremendous progress in virtually every area of the Company's operations.
The Company's branded once-daily diltiazem product known as Tiazac(R)in North
America and Viazem SR(R) in Europe (where it is marketed under a number of
brand names) was approved in a number of major European markets in 1997. In
August, Viazem SR(R) successfully completed a European Mutual Recognition
Procedure. Biovail's Viazem SR(R) is now approved and marketed in many European
Community nations. The product was approved for the angina pectoris indication
in the United Kingdom and approval of this indication in other EC countries is
eminent. Biovail has licensing agreements for Viazem SR(R) in all the
territories where approval has been received.
In addition, agreements were negotiated towards the end of 1997 for marketing
the product in Italy, Argentina, Brazil and Australia. Excluding North America,
Biovail has now executed licensing and marketing agreements for its branded
once-daily diltiazem product in 14 countries.
In the US, the market share of Tiazac(R) continues to grow steadily. The recent
FDA approval of Tiazac(R) for the treatment of angina pectoris will increase
the product's market potential, as it creates further inroads into the
important managed care market segment. In late 1997, Forest Laboratories
announced the addition of 200 new sales representatives. This will
significantly increase the detailing of Tiazac(R) in the US market, and an
increase in Tiazac(R) sales is anticipated.
In Canada, Tiazac(R) received approval in April, 1997 for the treatment of
hypertension. Crystaal Corporation, Biovail's Canadian sales and marketing
subsidiary, successfully launched Tiazac(R) in May of 1997. With a
comprehensive marketing strategy in place, Tiazac(R) is positioned to capture a
significant share of the Canadian diltiazem market.
EUGENE N. MELNYK
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
[PHOTO]
<PAGE> 6
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
Biovail expanded its generic product portfolio with the successful filing of
Abbreviated New Drug Applications ("ANDAs") for a number of important products.
Among these are generic controlled-release formulations of Cardizem CD and
Verelan. In the first quarter of 1998, ANDAs were filed for generic versions of
Adalat CC and Procardia XL. Biovail currently has six products awaiting FDA
approval. The combined annual sales of the branded versions of these products
currently exceeds $2.0 billion in the US market alone.
These filings strengthen Biovail's position as an international leader in the
development of controlled-release pharmaceutical products, and are a vital
component of the Company's short-term earnings growth strategy. To maximize the
opportunities these ANDA products represent, the Company's objective is to
enter into licensing agreements for the marketing of these products worldwide.
In December, Biovail concluded a multi-dimensional marketing and product
development agreement with a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
("Teva"). The agreement provides Teva with exclusive US marketing rights for
12 generic products from Biovail's portfolio of controlled-release products.
Biovail retains the exclusive manufacturing rights for these products. These
include generic formulations of Cardizem CD, Cardizem SR, Verelan, Trental,
Procardia XL and Adalat CC, as well as six other products. Regulatory approval
of these products is expected to begin in 1998.
Canadian marketing agreements were also concluded in 1997 for a number of
generic products. Novopharm Ltd. is Biovail's marketing partner for the
Company's generic Cardizem CD and Technilab Pharma Inc. will market Biovail's
generic Trental, Verelan and Cardizem SR upon regulatory approval of the
products.
Last year, Biovail made significant progress in implementing its mid- and
long-term strategy through the successful formation of Intelligent Polymers
Limited ("IPL"), an exciting research endeavor. Launched through a $75 million
public offering in October of 1997, IPL's mandate is to develop branded
once-daily controlled-release versions of carefully selected high volume
products that are currently marketed only as immediate-release formulations.
All proceeds from the IPL offering are dedicated to research, clinical testing,
product development and subsequent filing and approval of promising branded
products. Biovail is under contract to perform this work on behalf of IPL.
ROBERT A. PODRUZNY
PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
[PHOTO]
KENNETH G. HOWLING
VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
[PHOTO]
BRUCE D. BRYDON
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
[PHOTO]
<PAGE> 7
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
The unprecedented positive response to the IPL launch has allowed the Company
to initiate work on several promising products. With the IPL funding, the
Company will be able to perform advanced research without negatively affecting
Biovail's current earnings base.
The development of products through IPL will provide Biovail with the
sustainable high quality earnings that are achievable only in the
branded-product segment of the global pharmaceutical industry.
Biovail Contract Research performed strongly in 1997. Enhancements and
upgrades completed early in the year resulted in a three-fold increase in
bioanalytical laboratory tests performed, and a 42% increase in subject
bed-nights. In 1997, Biovail Contract Research played a pivotal role in
Biovail's timely and efficient regulatory filings.
Crystaal further enhanced its profile in Canada in 1997 through an exclusive
agreement with Fournier Pharma Inc., the Canadian subsidiary of the respected
French pharmaceutical company. Under the terms of the agreement, Crystaal will
co-promote Fournier's Lipidil Micro (micronized fenofibrate), a leading
Cholesterol lowering agent. Since the beginning of 1998, Crystaal has already
in-licensed two promising new products, and negotiations are in the final
stages for additional products.
Financially, 1997 was another record year for Biovail. Revenue for the year
was $82.4 million, an increase of 24% over 1996's previous record revenue of
$66.4 million. Net income in 1997 increased by 51% to $35.2 million, or $1.38
per share, compared with net income of $23.2 million, or $0.92 per share in
1996.
Overall, Biovail's financial position is solid, with $93.7 million in total
assets, $47.7 million in working capital, minimal debt of $5 million and
shareholders equity of $75.5 million. This strong financial position allows us
to continue to pursue promising opportunities that are consistent with the
Company's business development and growth strategy.
ROLF K. REININGHAUS
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
AND PRESIDENT CRYSTAAL
CORPORATION
[PHOTO]
KENNETH C. CANCELLARA
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND
GENERAL COUNSEL
[PHOTO]
<PAGE> 8
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
In summary, Biovail Corporation International currently has 12 products
marketed worldwide generating revenues in excess of $400 million; a total of 17
blockbuster products in the development pipeline (with combined annual US
market sales of the branded formulations of these products presently exceeding
$7 billion in revenue); leading-edge scientific expertise; the resources and
experience to take a product from development to the global marketplace;
positioning through Crystaal to become a significant force in the Canadian
market; a strong financial position and a focused management team with the
experience and insight to adapt to changing market dynamics. Biovail remains an
earnings-driven and growth-oriented Company with a well-defined strategy for
expansion and profitability.
I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge Bob Podruzny in his new
position as President and Chief Operating Officer of Biovail. Bob was
previously Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Bruce Brydon
remains Biovail's Chief Executive Officer. Rolf Reininghaus, Biovail's Senior
Vice President, Corporate and Strategic Development has assumed the additional
role of President of Crystaal Corporation. Dr. Isa Odidi was promoted to the
position of Vice President, Research and Development, in recognition of his
outstanding contributions. Finally, I would like to welcome Ken Howling to
Biovail as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer.
On behalf of the Board and management of Biovail I express my sincere
appreciation to all of our employees and shareholders for their invaluable
contribution to what has been a truly exciting and successful year.
Sincerely,
Eugene Melnyk
Chairman of the Board
<PAGE> 9
1997 THE YEAR IN REVIEW
<PAGE> 10
CURRENT PRODUCTS
Tiazac(R)
Biovail's branded once-daily diltiazem competes in the calcium channel blocker
category, a class of drug used worldwide in the treatment of hypertension and
angina. In the US alone, hypertension accounts for almost 15% of all
prescriptions written. US annual sales of diltiazem products are close to
$1 billion, and the market share of this class of drug continues to grow.
With once-daily products accounting for approximately 90% of diltiazem sales,
Tiazac(R) is ideally positioned. Tiazac(R) offers several therapeutic benefits,
including enhanced bioavailability and a more consistent 24-hour reduction in
diastolic blood pressure compared to competitive products, as well as
significant cost advantages. Since its introduction in early 1996, Tiazac has
already achieved significant market penetration.
[GRAPH]
<PAGE> 11
CURRENT PRODUCTS
Tiazac(R) is marketed in the US by Forest Laboratories Inc., a company with an
aggressive, results-oriented sales team and a comprehensive marketing network.
At the conclusion of 1997, Tiazac(R) had achieved a 12% share of new diltiazem
prescriptions, generating an annual run rate of over $100 million in sales
revenue.
The Company anticipates that US sales of Tiazac(R) will grow at an accelerated
rate in 1998 due to several factors. Forest Laboratories has announced that
Tiazac(R) will be detailed by 200 additional sales representatives, beginning
in the first half of 1998. Also, in the first quarter of 1998, Tiazac(R)
received FDA approval for the angina pectoris indication. Angina currently
accounts for 30% of total diltiazem sales. The approval of Tiazac(R) for both
hypertension and angina increases the market potential, as the product can now
be marketed more aggressively to the large US managed care market.
Tiazac(R) was launched in Canada by Crystaal Corporation in May, 1997. Through
Crystaal's strong marketing efforts, Tiazac was detailed to more than 3,000
Canadian physicians within a month of the launch. By the end of June 1997,
Tiazac(R) was being stocked in a third of all Canadian pharmacies and drug
wholesalers.
In Canada, sales of products such as Tiazac(R) are strongly influenced by
listing on provincial formularies. A formulary listing establishes a product as
an approved medication, qualifying for reimbursement. By the end of 1997,
Tiazac(R) was listed on seven of 10 provincial formularies, with listing on the
three remaining formularies being imminent. These listings, combined with
Crystaal's aggressive marketing strategy, will contribute significantly to
increased Canadian sales of Tiazac(R) in 1998.
<PAGE> 12
CURRENT PRODUCTS
Viazem SR(R)
The Company's branded once-daily diltiazem product, know as Viazem SR(R) in
Europe (and marketed under a number of brand names in different European
territories), successfully completed the European Mutual Recognition Procedure
in August of 1997. Viazem SR(R) is now approved for the treatment of
hypertension in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
Sweden and the Netherlands. Viazem SR(R) was approved for hypertension in the
United Kingdom in March of 1996.
Another exciting event was the approval in the United Kingdom for Viazem SR(R)
for the treatment of angina. Additional approvals for angina in Europe are
expected in 1998. These approvals will provide Viazem SR(R) with total access
to the European diltiazem market.
Revenues from European sales are anticipated to grow throughout 1998.
Also in the past year, Biovail expanded the marketing of Viazem SR(R) into
other world markets. Agreements were signed late in the year with globally
recognized pharmaceutical companies to market the product in Brazil, Argentina
and Australia. Biovail presently has licensing agreements for its once-daily
diltiazem in 14 countries worldwide.
<PAGE> 13
CURRENT PRODUCTS
ORUVAIL AND OTHER PRODUCTS
Oruvail, Biovail's once-daily extended-release Ketoprofen, continued to perform
strongly in 1997, with worldwide licensee sales of approximately $200 million.
Used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, chronic
conditions affecting 18 million individuals in the US alone, Oruvail is
marketed in the US by Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories and outside of the U.S. by
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer
In addition, Biovail's extensive portfolio includes a number of products used
in the treatment of chronic conditions. All of these products utilize Biovail's
controlled-release delivery technology. They are marketed around the world
through licensing agreements with leading international pharmaceutical
companies.
These products include:
Norpace (antiarrhythmic)
Theo-24 (bronchodilator)
Isoket Retard (coronary vasodilator)
Elantan Long (coronary vasodilator)
Sirdalud CR (muscle relaxant)
Gastro-Timelets (GI motility modifier)
Novagent (anti-inflammatory)
Beta-Timelets (anti-hypertensive)
Tiamon Mono (analgesic)
Reganon Retard (anti-obesity)
<PAGE> 14
BIOVAIL CONTRACT RESEARCH
Biovail Contract Research is a stand-alone business unit providing clinical
research services and laboratory testing for third party international and
domestic pharmaceutical companies, as well as for Biovail. Biovail Contract
Research operates independently with its own Institutional Review Board to
assure its third party clients of confidentiality and total integrity. Located
in Toronto, Biovail Contract Research's facilities include a modern 35,000
sq.ft. building including a fully equipped bioanalytical laboratory and a
live-in Bio Center, where Phase I bioavailability and bioequivalence studies
are performed.
In 1997, the management team was strengthened at Biovail Contract Research with
a mandate to increase business. Facilities were further upgraded, resulting in
significant increase in productivity. Test results produced in the laboratory
increased by 300% and bed-night utilization in the Bio Center rose by 42%.
In addition to its work for third party clients in 1997, Biovail Contract
Research played a vital and cost efficient role in the ANDA filings for Biovail
products. Biovail Contract Research will also be instrumental in testing and
preparing submissions for future Biovail and IPL products.
<PAGE> 15
Manufacturing
Biovail controls all aspects of the pharmaceutical development and production
process, including product manufacturing. The Company operates
state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities in Manitoba, Canada and in Puerto
Rico. These modern facilities are FDA approved and designed specifically for
the manufacture of controlled-release drug products, including Tiazac(R) for
the North American, European and other markets.
<PAGE> 16
Crystaal Corporation
Biovail's wholly owned Canadian sales and marketing subsidiary experienced
significant growth in 1997. Crystaal successfully launched TiazacAE in the
Canadian marketplace in the second quarter of 1997. Tiazac(R) success is
expected to accelerate in 1998, as the product is added to provincial
formularies. At the end of 1997, Tiazac(R) was listed on seven of 10
provincial formularies. Listing on the remaining three provincial formularies,
including Ontario (Canada's largest diltiazem market) is expected in 1998.
Formulary listings, which qualify a drug product for reimbursement, have a
major impact on sales in the Canadian market.
Crystaal's mandate is to expand its portfolio of branded products through the
addition of products manufactured and/or licensed from Biovail, as well as
products in-licensed through strategic marketing alliances.
In the fourth quarter of 1997, Crystaal entered into a sales agreement with the
international pharmaceutical firm Fournier Pharma Inc for the co-marketing in
Canada of Fournier's Lipidil Micro, a leading cholesterol lowering agent that
lowers the levels of LDL cholesterol while significantly increasing HDL
cholesterol. This will further strengthen Crystaal's marketing profile and is
expected to contribute significant revenues without additional costs.
To better manage future operating costs and maximize utilization of corporate
resources, Crystaal's head office was relocated from Montreal to Toronto in the
fourth quarter of 1997. In 1998, Crystaal will in-license a number of promising
branded-products, effectively expanding its portfolio and strengthening its
position in the Canadian pharmaceutical marketplace.
<PAGE> 17
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Ongoing research and development is essential to Biovail's future growth and
profitability. Biovail's scientists employ leading-edge technology, as well as
the latest in computer modeling and simulation techniques, at its
state-of-the-art Canadian research laboratory.
The Company's proprietary controlled-release delivery platforms have been
developed to be highly flexible, providing release profiles that can be
tailored to a number of drug compounds.
Biovail's expertise in controlled-release drug delivery technology allows the
Company to pursue the development of technically challenging controlled-release
formulations of existing high volume products. The focus is on developing both
generic and branded controlled-release products that provide clear competitive
advantages (i.e. clinical and/or cost benefits) over existing products.
The development of high margin branded pharmaceutical products is a major
component of Biovail's mid- and long-term strategy. Biovail's made significant
progress in implementing this strategy in 1997, through the successful public
offering of Intelligent Polymers Limited. This offering raised significant
funds, which will be devoted to the research and development of branded
controlled-release products.
DR. ISA ODIDI
VICE-PRESIDENT
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
[PHOTO]
<PAGE> 18
THE BIOVAIL PIPELINE
BIOVAIL'S PIPELINE STRATEGY
Since its inception, Biovail has achieved a unique position within the global
pharmaceutical industry, by focusing its expertise and resources on the
development of advanced controlled-release products in key therapeutic
categories. Oral controlled-release products represent the most significant
growth area in the pharmaceutical marketplace. Annual sales of these products
in the US alone are in excess of $8 billion. In addition, on a global basis,
this sector is expanding by more than 30% annually.
Biovail has evolved into a global company, with a diverse portfolio of twelve
products marketed world-wide, in addition to a strong pipeline of both branded
and generic products.
Biovail's mandate is to ensure a strong, expanding portfolio through the
development of select generic (ANDA) and branded (NDA) controlled-release
products.
Biovail's generic strategy is to focus on select products that are free from
patent protection, or for which patent expiration is near term. This allows for
timely product development and approval, thus ensuring near-term revenue flow
and a prompt return on investment.
Biovail's branded-product strategy is to develop improved proprietary
controlled-release versions of existing high volume immediate-release products.
These improved branded-products provide the sustainable mid- and long-term high
margin returns associated with the branded pharmaceutical market.
<PAGE> 19
THE BIOVAIL PIPELINE
The ANDA Pipeline
Biovail currently has six significant controlled-release generic products filed
with the US Food and Drug Administration. Combined, the branded versions of
these formulations account for annual US sales of approximately $2.0 billion.
During 1997, the Company filed ANDAs for generic versions of Cardizem CD, a
hypertension/angina medication with US sales of $700 million; and Verelan, a
hypertension/angina agent with US sales of $110 million.
Two additional cardiovascular products were filed in early 1998. These are
generic versions of Adalat CC, a product with US sales of $365 million; and
Procardia XL, a product with US sales of $785 million.
In addition, in 1996 the Company filed ANDAs for a generic version of Cardizem
SR, an anti-hypertensive with US sales of $20 million; as well as a generic
version of Trental, a peripheral vascular agent with US sales of $150 million.
Approval of these two products is anticipated in the near term.
Biovail's generic pipeline also includes six additional products for the
treatment of chronic disease states. These products, presently undisclosed for
competitive reasons, will be generic versions of branded products that, in
aggregate represent $2 billion in annual sales.
Marketing of ANDA Products
Biovail's strategy is to market its generic products though licensing
agreements and strategic partnerships with prominent global pharmaceutical
partners. Licensing agreements are currently in place for existing Biovail
products with a number of international companies.
In December of 1997, Biovail concluded a multi-dimensional agreement with a
subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. ("Teva") for the exclusive US
marketing of Biovail's pipeline of 12 controlled-release generic products.
Based in Israel, Teva is one of the premier generic companies operating in the
US, with an established reputation and a strong marketing presence. The terms
of the agreement include payment by Teva to Biovail of $34.5 million, on
achievement of pre-determined R & D milestones, as well as sharing of sales
revenue, after deductions of specified expenses. Negotiations are presently
underway for additional territories. Under the terms of the agreement Biovail
maintains exclusive manufacturing rights for these products.
<PAGE> 20
THE BIOVAIL PIPELINE
The NDA Pipeline
Biovail's NDA product strategy is to develop branded controlled-release
products offering mid and long-term high margin returns. The Company's
implementation of this strategy was significantly enhanced in 1997 with the
successful public offering of Intelligent Polymers Limited. ("IPL")
IPL was formed by Biovail in October, 1997 specifically to fund the development
of branded once-daily controlled-release high volume products currently
marketed only as immediate formulations. The funds raised through the public
offering enable Biovail to pursue R & D opportunities in the lucrative branded
product market without negatively affecting earnings.
Approximately $75 million was raised through the IPL offering. All of the
IPL's resources will be applied directly to research, clinical testing, final
product development, approval and eventual commercialization of Biovail's
branded products.
Under the structure of the Biovail/IPL co-operation, Biovail and IPL will each
have specific rights and obligations. Biovail will have the option to acquire
all of IPL's common shares at pre-established prices over a five year period.
The research and development efforts of IPL will focus on branded
controlled-release products for chronic disease states, such as anxiety,
depression, hypercholesteremia, chronic pain and diabetes. Biovail has
identified five branded-products within these categories whose patents have
expired or are due to expire in the near future. Combined annual US branded
sales of these targeted products are in excess of $2.0 billion.
Branded Product Pipeline
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Product Indication
<S> <C>
Bromfenac(Duract) Pain management
Bupropion(Wellbutrin/Zyban) Depression, smoking cessation
Buspirone(Buspar) Anxiety,depression
Gabapentin(Neurontin) Seizure disorders
Metformin(Glucophage) Diabetes
Tramadol(Ultram) Pain management
</TABLE>
These branded-products will be out-licensed in a late stage of development to
strong marketing partners, thus maximizing return on R & D investment. Select
IPL NDA branded products will be marketed in Canada by Crystaal Corporation.
<PAGE> 21
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Biovail Corporation International ("Biovail" or "the Company") derives its
revenues from (I) developing and licensing oral controlled-release products
using its proprietary drug delivery technologies; (II) manufacturing such
products for sale to licensees and wholesalers; and (III) providing
pharmaceutical contract research services to third parties.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For Biovail, 1997 revenues increased by 24%, to $82,379,000 compared to the
preceding year. In 1996, revenues totalled $66,430,000 compared to $19,644,000
in 1995. Net income in 1997 increased by 51%, to $35,241,000 or $1.38 per
share, compared to $23,284,000 or $0.92 per share in 1996 and $5,870,000 or
$0.23 in 1995. The continued growth of the Company is due to the increasing
sales of Tiazac(R) in the U.S. market, the successful launch of Tiazac(R) in
Canada and the successful completion of several development and marketing
agreements for the Company's products.
In July 1997, Intelligent Polymers Limited ("IPL") was formed by the Company
primarily to advance the development of once-daily controlled-release versions
of selected drugs by combining the Company's proprietary drug delivery
technologies with various drug compounds for ultimate commercialization of such
products. In October 1997, IPL completed a public offering of units and
raised net proceeds of approximately $69,500,000. Substantially all of the
proceeds of the offering will be used to make payments to the Company under a
development agreement whereby Biovail will undertake the development on IPL's
behalf, of six identified once-daily controlled-release branded generic
versions of designated products.
In December 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. ("Teva") for the development and marketing
of twelve generic oral controlled-release products. Under the terms of the
agreement, Teva is obligated to pay the Company $34.5 million for reimbursement
of research and development fees and product shipments.
The Company's growth strategy relies on product shipments and advancing the
development of its pipeline products. In support of this strategy, the Company
incurred research and development expenses totalling $14,386,000 in 1997.
As at December 31, 1997, the Company's total assets were $93,739,000 and
shareholder's equity was $75,458,000.
<PAGE> 22
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
REVENUE
Revenues for 1997 were $82,379,000 an increase of $15,949,000 or 24% compared to
the preceding year. In 1996, revenues amounted to $66,430,000 compared to
$19,644,000 in 1995. The 1997 revenue increase was primarily due to increased
research and development and royalty and licensing revenues.
Research and development revenue from third-party customers was $19,559,000 in
1997, compared to $4,374,000 and $4,333,000 in 1996 and 1995 respectively. The
increase in revenue was due to product development activities undertaken on
behalf of IPL and Teva.
Manufacturing revenue was $50,333,000 in 1997, compared to $54,313,000 in 1996
and $7,915,000 in 1995. In 1997 revenues were generated primarily on sales of
Tiazac(R) to Forest Laboratories (''Forest'') for the U.S. market, Canadian
market sales of Tiazac(R) by the Company's subsidiary, Crystaal Corporation
(''Crystaal''), and the shipment of prelaunch product to Teva. The decrease in
manufacturing revenue from 1996 was due to the inventory level adjustment by
Forest relating to initial inventory pipeline fill and launch sampling program
requirements. Additionally, the expected one time contractual price reduction to
Forest of approximately 25%, which occurred at the end of the second quarter of
1997, contributed to the year over year decline in manufacturing revenue.
Royalty and licensing revenue, net of related expenses, totaled $12,487,000 in
1997, compared to $7,743,000 and $7,396,000 in 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Included in royalty and licensing revenue in 1997 is a technology transfer fee
of $3,500,000 charged to IPL for access to and use of Biovail's proprietary
technology to be used in the development of IPL's products. Excluding the impact
of this transfer fee, net royalties increased 16% in 1997 as compared to 1996 as
a result of increased Oruvail(R) and Tiazac(R) sales in the U.S. market. The
increase in royalty revenue in 1996 over 1995 is primarily due to royalties
earned on sales of Tiazac(R).
COST OF MANUFACTURED GOODS SOLD AND GROSS MARGINS
The cost of manufactured goods sold was 33% in 1997 compared to 40% in 1996 and
34% in 1995. The Company's gross margins are impacted by product sales price,
product mix and manufacturing volumes. In 1997, Tiazac(R) U.S. ''trade sales''
(sales other than sample sales) were approximately 86% of total unit sales as
compared to only 40% in the comparable period in 1996. Trade supplies are sold
at a higher price than sample sales and also have a lower cost of manufacture
due to lower packaging and labor costs, resulting in a higher margin for trade
sales. In addition, the Company launched Tiazac(R) in Canada in 1997, accounting
for approximately 19% of total manufacturing revenues.
<PAGE> 23
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Canadian sales are at a higher margin than U.S. sales due to sales directly to
the market by Crystaal, as opposed to U.S. sales, which are made through a
marketing partner. As a result of the higher percentage of trade sales, launch
of Tiazac(R) in Canada and improved manufacturing efficiencies, the
manufacturing margins increased to 67% of revenues in 1997, as compared to 60%
in the comparable period in 1996. The 1995 margins are not meaningful
comparisons due to the low sales volumes.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses for 1997 were $14,386,000 as compared to
$10,901,000 and $7,194,000 in 1996 and 1995 respectively. The increased
spending reflects the Companyis increased level of research and development
activity on its greater number of pipeline products and the increased research
and development activity for third party customers.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $13,989,000 in 1997,
compared to $10,166,000 in 1996 and $7,182,000 in 1995. The year to year
increases are primarily as a result of the impact of increased levels of
activity in the Company including sales and marketing expenses related to the
launch of Tiazac(R) in Canada, the registration costs associated with Tiazac(R)
in the European markets and the hiring of key management personnel.
Operating Income
Operating income of $37,533,000 was achieved in 1997 compared to operating
income of $23,606,000 in 1996 and $2,553,000 in 1995. Canadian operations
incurred operating losses of $935,000, $6,153,000 and $6,720,000 in each of
1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. The decrease in operating losses is due to
the impact of the launch of Tiazac(R) in Canada in 1997. Canadian operational
losses are due to expenses incurred with respect to corporate office, sales and
marketing operations and research and development activity. Operating income of
$3,929,000, $4,167,000 and $2,571,000 in each of 1997, 1996, and 1995
respectively was earned by the Company's subsidiary in Switzerland through
royalties earned on Biovail's products. Operations in Barbados and Puerto Rico
contributed operating income of $34,539,000 in 1997, $25,592,000 in 1996, and
$6,702,000 1995. The increases in operating income in Barbados and Puerto Rico
was due primarily to manufacturing sales and product development activities.
<PAGE> 24
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest
Interest expense was $351,000 in 1997 and $99,000 in 1995 as compared to
interest income of $392,000 in 1996. Net interest expense in 1997 was due to
the utilizatization of the company's operating line throughout the year to
support working capital requirements. Net interest income in 1996 was earned as
a result of surplus cash and short-term deposits.
Income Taxes
Income taxes in 1997, 1996, and 1995 in the amounts of $1,941,000, $714,000,
and $201,000 respectively, relate to the Company's foreign subsidiaries.
Net Income
The company recorded net income of $35,241,000 or $1.38 per share in 1997,
compared to $22,284,000 or $0.92 per share in 1996 and $5,870,000 or $0.23 per
share in 1996. Earnings per share have been calculated using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As at December 31, 1997, the Company's working capital was $47,663,000 compared
to $9,606,000 at December 31, 1996 which represented a working capital ratio of
4.2:1 as compared to 1.6:1 respectively.
The Company had positive cash flow of $4,316,000, in 1997, compared to negative
cash flow of $5,632,000 in the comparable period in 1996. Cash generated from
operations was $38,398,000 and $25,251,000 in 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Working capital increased in 1997 due to an increase in accounts receivable
related to the launch of Tiazac(R) in Canada, amounts owing from Teva relating
to the reimbursement of research and development fees and increases in
inventories related to raw material inventories for Tiazac(R) and generic
products.
Although similar increases in the non-cash components of working capital
relative to operating income may occur in the future, the Company believes such
increases are temporary in nature and are not expected to have a long-term
effect on the Companyis cash flow.
Investing activities in 1997, related to additions to fixed assets of
$2,664,000, an increase in loans to executive officers of $421,000, the
acquisition of product rights and intangibles of $86,000 and an investment in
IPL consisting of special shares of $12,000. In the comparable 1996 period
investing activities included additions to fixed assets of
<PAGE> 25
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
$6,692,000, loans of $2,512,000 to executive officers to finance the open
market acquisition of shares of the Company and the acquisition of product
rights and intangibles of $1,161,000.
Net cash was generated from financing activities of $2,635,000 in 1997 compared
to net cash used in financing activities of $2,980,000 in 1996. The 1997 cash
generated was a result of $4,464,000 received from the issuance of common
shares on the exercise of stock options, offset by net long-term debt
repayments of $1,829,000. In the comparable period in 1996, cash utilization
was a result of net long-term debt repayments of $3,177,000 offset by proceeds
of $197,000 received from the issuance of common shares on the exercise of
stock options.
Exchange rate changes on foreign cash balances resulted in a reduction of cash
of $19,000 and $830,000 in 1997, and 1996, respectively.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company's cash position as at December 31,
1997 was $8,275,000, compared to $4,526,000 at December 31, 1996.
The Company's total long-term debt (including current portions thereof) was
$4,847,000 as at December 31, 1997 compared to $6,968,000 at December 31, 1996.
In addition, the Company has available lines of credit aggregating $45,000,000
for short-term financing and as of December 31, 1997 there were no outstanding
borrowings under these lines of credit.
The Company believes it has adequate capital and sources of financing to support
its ongoing operational requirements. Furthermore, the Company believes it will
be able to obtain long-term capital, if necessary, to support its growth
objectives. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company's capital and
sources of financing or its ability to obtain additional capital or sources of
financing, at acceptable terms, will be sufficient to sustain the Companyis
ongoing operational requirements or its growth objectives.
The Company and its subsidiaries generate revenue and expenses primarily in
U.S. and Canadian dollars. In 1997, revenue was generated in the following
proportions: 88% in U.S. dollars, 11% in Canadian dollars and 1% in other
currencies. In addition expenses were incurred in the following proportions:
73% in U.S. dollars, and 27% in Canadian dollars. The Company does not believe
that its exposure to foreign currency exchange risk is significant because of
the relative stability of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar. The Company
has not historically utilized foreign currency hedging instruments.
<PAGE> 26
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Inflation
Inflation has not had a material impact on the Company's operations.
Year 2000 Compliance
The Company, amongst all other companies worldwide, is exposed to the risks and
uncertainties associated with the Year 2000 software problem. The Company is
currently engaged in a project to upgrade its information, technology,
manufacturing computer software and hardware systems within all of its
operations to programs that are certified Year 2000 compliant. Presently, the
Company does not anticipate that this will have a material adverse effect on
the business operations or financial performance. However, there can be no
assurance that this problem will not adversely affect the Company and its
business.
Forward-Looking Statements
To the extent any statements made in this annual report deal with information
that is not historical, these statements are necessarily forward-looking. As
such, they are subject to the occurrence of many events outside of the
Companyis control and are subject to various risk factors that would cause our
results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statement. The risk factors are described in the Companyis filings with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities authorities and
include, without limitation, the inherent risk of technical product development
failure, the risk of clinical outcomes, regulatory risks, and risks related to
proprietary rights, litigation, market acceptance and competition.
<PAGE> 27
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
The Company's management is responsible for preparing the accompanying
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in Canada. The effect of the application of accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States is described in the notes to
consolidated financial statements. In preparing these consolidated financial
statements, management selects appropriate accounting policies and uses its
judgment and best estimates to report events and transactions as they occur.
Management has determined such amounts on a reasonable basis in order to ensure
that the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects.
Financial data included throughout this Annual Report is prepared on a basis
consistent with that of the financial statements.
The Company maintains a system of internal accounting controls designed to
provide reasonable assurance, at a reasonable cost, that assets are safeguarded
and that transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with the
Company's policies for doing business. This system is supported by written
policies and procedures for key business activities; the hiring of qualified,
competent staff; and by a continuous planning and monitoring program.
Deloitte & Touche has been engaged by the Company's shareholders to audit the
consolidated financial statements. During the course of their audit, Deloitte
& Touche reviewed the Company's system of internal controls to the extent
necessary to render their opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its
responsibility for financial reporting and is ultimately responsible for
reviewing and approving the financial statements. The Board carries out the
responsibility principally through its Audit Committee. The majority of the
members of the Audit Committee are outside Directors. The Committee considers,
for review by the Board of Directors and approval by the shareholders, the
engagement or reappointment of the external auditors. Deloitte & Touche has
full and free access to the Audit Committee.
Management acknowledges its responsibility to provide financial information
that is representative of the Company's operations, is consistent and reliable,
and is relevant for the informed evaluation of the Company's activities.
Eugene N. Melnyk Kenneth G. Howling
Chairman of the Board Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE> 28
AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of BIOVAIL CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Biovail Corporation
International as at December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the consolidated statements
of income and retained earnings (deficit) and of cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards in Canada. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit
to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31,
1997 and 1996 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997 in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in Canada.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 20, 1998
<PAGE> 29
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As at December 31, 1997 and 1996
(all dollar amounts are expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT
Cash and short-term deposits $ 8,275 $ 4,526
Accounts receivable (Note 4) 33,114 10,364
Inventories (Note 5) 16,609 8,134
Executive stock purchase plan loans (Note 6) 2,933 2,512
Deposits and prepaid expenses 2,053 1,063
------- -------
62,984 26,599
FIXED ASSETS, net (Note 7) 24,172 24,819
OTHER ASSETS, net (Note 8) 6,583 7,188
------- -------
$93,739 $58,606
------- -------
LIABILITIES
CURRENT
Accounts payable $ 4,579 $ 5,468
Accrued liabilities 6,002 1,738
Income taxes payable 1,013 808
Customer prepayments 1,840 6,681
Current potion of long-term debt (Note 9) 1,887 2,298
------- -------
15,321 16,983
LONG-TERM DEBT (Note 9) 2,960 4,670
------- -------
18,281 21,663
------- -------
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Share capital (Note 10) 18,465 14,614
Warrants (Note 10) 8,244 --
Retained earnings 49,709 22,712
Cumulative translation adjustment (960) (383)
------- -------
75,458 36,693
------- -------
$93,739 $58,606
------- -------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
On behalf of the Board:
EUGENE N. MELNYK BRUCE D. BRYDON
Chairman of the Board Director and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE> 30
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT)
For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995
(All dollar amounts except per share data are
expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE
Research and development $ 19,559 $ 4,374 $ 4,333
Manufacturing 50,333 54,313 7,915
Royalty and licensing 12,487 7,743 7,396
----------- ----------- -----------
82,379 66,430 19,644
----------- ----------- -----------
EXPENSES
Research and development 14,386 10,901 7,194
Cost of manufactured goods sold 16,471 21,757 2,715
Selling general and administrative 13,989 10,166 7,182
----------- ----------- -----------
44,846 42,824 17,091
----------- ----------- -----------
OPERATING INCOME 37,533 23,606 2,553
INTEREST (EXPENSE) INCOME net (Note 9) (351) 392 (99)
GAIN ON LICENSING SETTLEMENT (Note 15) - - 3,617
----------- ----------- -----------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 37,182 23,998 6,071
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES (Note 12) 1,941 714 201
----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCOME 35,241 23,284 5,870
RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT),
BEGINNING OF YEAR 22,712 (572) (6,442)
CONTRIBUTION TO INTELLIGENT POLYMERS
LIMITED (Note 10) (8,244) - -
----------- ----------- -----------
RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT), END OF YEAR $ 49,709 $ 22,712 $ (572)
=========== =========== ===========
EARNINGS PER SHARE (Note 11) $ 1.38 $ 0.92 $ 0.23
=========== =========== ===========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES OUTSTANDING (Note 11) 25,606,000 25,378,000 24,993,000
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
<PAGE> 31
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995
(All dollar amounts are expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
NET INFLOW (OUTFLOW) OF CASH RELATED
TO THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES
OPERATING
Net income for the year $ 35,241 $ 23,284 $ 5,870
Depreciation and amortization 3,157 1,967 1,238
--------- -------- --------
38,398 25,251 7,108
Change in non-cash operating items
(Note 14) (34,082) (30,873) 24,038
--------- -------- --------
4,316 (5,622) 31,146
--------- -------- --------
INVESTING
Additions to fixed assets, net (2,664) (6,692) (2,642)
Purchase of product rights
and intangibles, net (Note 8) (86) (1,161) (2,617)
Executive stock purchase plan loans (Note 6) (421) (2,512) --
Investment in Intelligent Polymers Limited
(Note 8) (12) -- --
Business acquisition (Note 3) -- -- (4,288)
Balance of consideration with respect to the
acquisition of subsidiary companies and
non-controlling interest therein -- -- (955)
--------- -------- --------
(3,183) (10,365) (10,502)
--------- -------- --------
FINANCING
Issuance of share capital (Note 10) 4,464 197 702
Increase in long-term debt 373 841 2,852
Reduction in long-term debt (2,202) (4,018) (3,293)
--------- -------- --------
2,635 (2,980) 261
--------- -------- --------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE
CHANGES ON CASH (19) (830) 599
--------- -------- --------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 3,749 (19,797) 21,504
CASH AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSITS,
BEGINNING OF YEAR 4,526 24,323 2,819
--------- -------- --------
CASH AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSITS,
END OF YEAR $ 8,275 $ 4,526 $ 24,323
========= ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
<PAGE> 32
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except number of shares and per
share data)
1. GOVERNING STATUTE AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Company was formed by the amalgamation of its predecessor
companies, Trimel Corporation and its then subsidiary, Biovail Corporation
International (the "Company") effective March 29, 1994 under the laws of
the province of Ontario. The Company is an international full-service
pharmaceutical company engaged in the formulation, clinical testing,
registration and manufacture of drug products utilizing advanced drug
delivery technologies.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in Canada. The financial
statements differ in certain respects from generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States, as described in Note 18
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and those of all its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES
In preparing the Company's financial statements, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of all financial assets and liabilities, other
than long-term debt, approximates their carrying values at December 31,
1997. Fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at
which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between
willing parties. The fair value of long-term debt is disclosed in Note 9.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Research and development revenue represents fees earned from third party
customers for services rendered with respect to contract research and
product development done on their behalf. The Company's policy is to
expense as incurred all research and product development costs net of
investment tax credits, related to both costs incurred on its own behalf
and on behalf of its third party customers.
Revenue from the sale of manufactured products is recognized when the
product is shipped to the customer.
<PAGE> 33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED
Royalty revenue is recognized on an accrual basis in accordance with
contractual agreements with third parties and is net of amounts payable to
sublicensees.
Licensing revenue is recognized at the date the license is granted unless
there are specific events which must be completed under the terms of the
licensing agreement in which case a portion of the revenue is recognized
upon the completion of each specific event
CASH AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSITS
Cash and short-term deposits include highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less when purchased.
INVENTORIES
Raw materials are valued at the lower of cost and replacement cost. Work
in process and finished goods are valued at the lower of cost and net
realizable value. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis.
FIXED ASSETS AND RELATED DEPRECIATION
Fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Annual
rates applied to depreciate the cost of fixed assets over their estimated
useful lives using the straight line basis are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Buildings 25 years
Machinery and equipment 10 years
Other equipment 5 years
Leasehold improvements term of lease
</TABLE>
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill and product rights are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated lives of the assets, 8 to 20 years. Goodwill and product rights
are evaluated periodically, based on estimated future cash flows computed
on a discounted basis and if conditions warrant, an impairment valuation is
provided.
Investments are recorded at cost.
REPORTING CURRENCY AND FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATIONS
Reporting currency
The Company reports its financial statements in U.S. dollars, while the
currency of measurement for the Company's operations varies depending upon
location.
Foreign currency transactions
Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange
prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities
are translated at historic rates. Revenue and expenses are translated at
the average rate of exchange for the year. Exchange gains and losses are
included in earnings except for the unrealized gains or losses on
long-term debt which are deferred and amortized over the term of the debt.
At December 31, 1997 and 1996 there were no unrealized exchange gains or
losses.
<PAGE> 34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED
Self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries
Assets and liabilities of self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries are
translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date.
Revenue and expenses are translated at the average rate of exchange for the
year. Gains or losses arising on the translation of financial statements
of self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries are deferred and included as a
separate component of shareholders' equity. The net change in the
cumulative translation adjustment balance in the years presented is
primarily due to fluctuations in the exchange rate in respect to the Swiss
Franc and Canadian dollars.
CUSTOMER PREPAYMENTS
Amounts received from customers as prepayments for goods or services to be
provided in the future are recorded on the balance sheet as customer
prepayments. When the goods or services are provided at a future date,
they are billed to the customer at contractual rates. Accounts receivable
on these billings are recorded net of that portion that relates to the
prepayments received, which amount is recorded as a reduction to customer
prepayments.
1996 AND 1995 FIGURES
Certain of the 1996 and 1995 figures have been reclassified to conform to
the 1997 presentation.
3. BUSINESS ACQUISITION
ACQUISITION OF OPERATING ASSETS OF GALEPHAR PUERTO RICO INC., LIMITED
Effective September 13, 1995, a subsidiary of the Company acquired the
operating assets of Galephar Puerto Rico Inc., Limited ("Galephar"), a
drug delivery company specializing in the development of controlled release
products. This acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase
method and the net assets acquired at the fair value assigned thereto and
consideration paid is as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Fixed assets $3,743
Working capital deficiency (415)
Goodwill 960
------
Net assets acquired $4,288
======
Cash consideration paid $4,288
======
</TABLE>
The historical operations of Galephar, when compared to the historical
operations of Biovail, were not significant.
4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
--------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Trade and royalties $ 31,331 $ 8,082
Other receivables 1,783 2,282
--------- --------
$ 33,114 $ 10,364
========= ========
</TABLE>
Other receivables comprise primarily amounts relating to refundable
withholding taxes, goods and services tax, and customs and duties.
<PAGE> 35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. INVENTORIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $ 6,145 $ 4,212
Work in process 10,262 3,922
Finished goods 202 -
$ 16,609 $ 8,134
</TABLE>
6. EXECUTIVE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN LOANS
Executive Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") loans of $2,644,000 (1996 -
$2,512,000) were made to finance the acquisition of shares of the Company
on the open market by executive officers and an additional loan of $289,000
(1996 n nil) was made to an executive officer of the Company. The ESPP
loans are secured by shares of the Company owned by executive officers,
bear interest at 1/4 % over bank prime rate, equal to the Company's rate
for borrowings, and are due on December 1, 1998.
The additional loan to an executive officer of the Company bears interest
at 1/4 % over the bank prime rate, equal to the Company's rate for
borrowings. This loan and all outstanding interest were repaid to the
Company in January 1998.
7. FIXED ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
Accumulated Accumulated
Cost Depreciation Cost Depreciation
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Land $1,314 $- $1,314 $ -
Buildings 15,511 2,323 15,834 1,649
Machinery
and equipment 11,625 3,243 10,024 2,002
Otherequipment
andleasehold
improvements 2,816 1,528 2,369 1,071
31,266 $7,094 29,541 $ 4,722
Less
Accumulated
Depreciation 7,094 4,722
$24,172 $24,819
</TABLE>
8. OTHER ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
<S> <C> <C>
Goodwill, net $3,111 $3,377
Product rights, net 3,460 3,619
Investment - 192
Other $6,583 $7,188
</TABLE>
The investment consists of 12,000 special shares of Intelligent Polymers
Limited (iIPLi) at a cost of $12,000. These special shares have no rights
to any profit entitlement.
<PAGE> 36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
9. LONG-TERM DEBT AND LINE OF CREDIT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1998
NON-INTEREST BEARING GOVERNMENT LOAN
<S> <C> <C>
Payable to Western Economic Diversification, a Canadian
federal government agency. This loan is repayable on a
semi-annual installment basis with the final payment
due in 2001 $2,300 $2,850
OTHER
Term Bank Loan
Secured by a general security agreement, providing a
first floating charge over all of the Company's assets,
bearing interest at bank prime rate plus 0.75%. This
loan is repayable in equal quarterly principal
installments of $175,000 with the final payment due
December 31, 1998. 699 1,459
Bank Loan
Secured by a general security agreement, pledging all of
the Company's assets, including the shares of subsidiary
companies and a debenture with a fixed charge on certain
manufacturing facility land and building, bearing interest
at bank prime rate plus 0.75%. This loan is repayable in
equal quarterly principal installments of $175,000 with the
final payment due September 30, 2000. 1,848 2,659
4,847 6,968
Less current portion 1,887 2,298
$2,960 $4,670
</TABLE>
The Company has available lines of credit of $45,000,000 for short-term
financing with a Canadian chartered bank for which a charge on accounts
receivable, inventories and certain product rights has been given. As at
December 31, 1997, there were no outstanding borrowings under these lines
of credit.
The fair value of the long-term debt approximates $4,357,000 compared to
the carrying value of $4,847,000.
Interest expense on long-term debt amounted to $199,000, $591,000 and
$718,000 in the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Principal repayments on long-term debt are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1998 $ 1,887
1999 1,400
2000 1,322
2001 238
$ 4,847
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. SHARE CAPITAL
AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED SHARES
Effective January, 1996, the shareholder of the Company authorized a 3 for
1 split with respect to the issued common shares, and an increase in the
authorized capital to 60,000,000 common shares without par value.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Shares Amount
---------------- ------
<S> <C> <C>
(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 1994, before stock split 8,274 $13,415
Issued on exercise of options 168 702
Effect of exchange rate changes -- 372
------ -------
Balance, December 31, 1995 before stock split 8,442 14,489
Effect of 3 for 1 stock split 16,885 --
------ -------
Balance, December 31, 1995 after giving effect to stock split 25,327 14,489
Issued on exercise of options 100 197
Effect of exchange rate change -- (72)
------ -------
Balance, December 31, 1996 25,427 14,614
Issued on the exercise of options 1,233 4,434
Issued on Employee Stock Purchase Plan 1 30
Effect of exchange rate change -- (613)
------- -------
Balance December 31, 1997 26,661 $18,465
======= =======
</TABLE>
STOCK OPTIONS
The Company provides stock option incentive plans and has, with shareholder
approval, issued options to certain directors outside of the plans. The
plans are intended to provide long-term incentives and regards to executive
officers, directors, key employees and consultants, contingent upon an
increase in the market value of the Company's common stock. The total
number of shares which are reserved and set aside for issue under the Stock
Option Plan, and under all other management options outstanding shall not
in the aggregate exceeds 4,800,000 common shares. (Options for all years
presented, have been calculated after giving effect to the 3 for 1 split in
January, 1996).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(In thousands)
Options outstanding at beginning of year 2,751 2,779 1,908
Options granted during the year 1,179 208 1,461
Options exercised during the year (1,233) (100) (504)
Options cancelled during the year (177) (137) (86)
------ ------ ------
Options outstanding at end of year 2,520 2,751 2,779
====== ====== ======
Options exercisable at end of year 708 1,308 1,060
Price range of options grated during the year $22.00--$35.40 $20.00--$34.75 $2.44--$20.00
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. SHARE CAPITAL - CONTINUED
The outstanding options expire from 1998 to 2002 at exercise prices ranging
from Cdn. $1.00 to U.S. $35.40 per share. During 1997, options for
1,233,000 common shares were exercised for proceeds of $4,434,000.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company provides an Employee Stock Purchase Plan whereby the employees
can purchase stock, through contributions made by way of payroll
deductions.
WARRANTS
In October, 1997, IPL completed a public offering of 3,737,500 units. Each
unit comprised one common share of IPL and one warrant to purchase one
common share of the Company. The net proceeds to IPL of the offering
before offering expenses amounted to approximately $69,500,000. Beginning
September 30, 1999, the units will separate and the IPL common shares and
the Company warrants may trade independently of each other. The warrants
are exercisable at $40.00 per share from October 1, 1999, until September
30, 2002.
The Company has recorded a credit to equity of $8,244,000 equal to the
proceeds attributable to the warrants included in the offering as
determined at the time of their issuance and has recorded a charge to
retained earnings to reflect the equivalent contribution to IPL.
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share, for all years presented, has been calculated using the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, after giving
effect to the 3 for 1 stock split in January, 1996. The earnings per share
in 1997, 1996 and 1995 on a fully diluted basis giving effect to the
exercise of all options and warrants granted would have been $1.32, $0.83
and $0.21 per share, respectively.
12. INCOME TAXES
The major factors which caused variations from the Company's combined
federal and provincial statutory income tax rate of 44.34% applicable to
income before income taxes are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Provision for income taxes based on
statutory rate $16,486 $10,664 $2,692
Reduction of income taxes resulting from
income of foreign subsidiaries taxed
at lower effective rate (14,331) (12,932) (4,271)
Benefit of losses not recognized for
accounting purposes - 2,982 1,780
Benefit of utilization of losses carried forward (214) - -
$1,941 $714 $201
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
12. INCOME TAXES -- CONTINUED
At December 31, 1997, the Company has accumulated non-capital losses for
federal and provincial income tax purposes in Canada and unclaimed
investment tax credits for which no accounting benefit has been recognized
and which can be used to offset future taxable income and/or to reduce
income taxes payable. These losses and investment tax credits expire as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Non-Capital Losses
----------------------------- Investment
Federal Provincial Tax Credits
-------- ------------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998 $ 6,704 $ 7,335 $ 85
1999 3,271 3,957 904
2000 653 1,211 486
2001 2,175 2,164 447
2002 -- 1,251 142
2003 -- 3,168 457
2004 -- -- 809
2005 -- -- 773
2006 -- -- 2,500
-------- -------- --------
$ 12,803 $ 19,086 $ 6,603
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The benefits of these losses carried forward and investment tax credits will
be recorded when realized.
13. OPERATING LEASES
Minimum lease commitments under operating leases for each of the next five
years are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1998 $ 575
1999 154
2000 76
2001 15
2002 --
</TABLE>
14. CHANGE IN NON-CASH OPERATING ITEMS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Accounts receivable $ (23,145) $ (4,194) $ (963)
Inventories (8,622) (4,489) (3,795)
Deposits and prepaid expenses (991) (888) (111)
Accounts payable (875) 892 2,450
Accrued liabilities 4,190 (2,280) 1,096
Income taxes payable 201 (153) 193
Customer prepayments (4,840) (19,761) 25,168
--------- --------- --------
$ (34,082) $ (30,873) $ 24,038
========= ========= ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
15. LITIGATION
In 1995, the Company's previously existing, contractual, legal and
financial relationships with its former licensee, Hoechst-Roussel
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Hoechst") were resolved. Hoechst was previously
licensed by the Company for the once-daily controlled-release formulation
of diltiazem. As a result of Hoechst's aquisition of Marion Merrell Dow
Inc., a competitor of the Company, the Rights Agreement between the Company
and Hoechst was terminated effective June 30, 1995, resulting in a gain to
the Company of $3,617,000, net of legal and other expenses relating to the
settlement.
In 1996, Biovail entered into a Settlement Agreement with Elan Corporation
plc. ("Elan") which resolved all claims and counterclaims made in
Litigation with respect to alleged patent infringement by Biovail of Elan's
controlled release patents for the drug delivery system employed in
Cardizem CD. Such settlement agreement requires the payment of royalties
by Biovail to Elan on U.S. sales of Tiazac(R) and on U.S. sales of any
generic version of Cardizem CD introduced by Biovail and payments by Elan
to Biovail on U.S. sales of Verelan. Pursuant to such settlement
agreement, Biovail expects to be able to seek to introduce a generic
version of Cardizem CD, free of patent infringement litigation by Elan.
Furthermore, pursuant to such settlement agreement, Elan is precluded in
substance from commencing a lawsuit for patent infringement of its generic
version of Verelan. However, Elan's exclusive licensee has commenced a
patent infringement suit on behalf of such licensee and Elan which alleges
that Biovail's filing of its ANDA for a generic version of Verelan
infringes one claim of the patent covering Verelan. If successful, that
suit could delay Biovail's marketing of its Verelan generic product.
Biovail is vigorously defending such suit and has counterclaimed alleging
that Elan's licensee has violated the anti-trust laws of the United States
by filing a frivolous suit in an attempt to maintain market exclusivity.
In addition, Biovail has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment seeking an
order from the court that its ANDA does not infringe that patent.
In January, 1998, Andrx Pharmaceutical, Inc., ("Andrx") commenced action
against the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), the Company and Faulding
Inc., seeking an order from the Court which would preclude the FDA from
approving any subsequently-filed ANDAs, including the Company's filed ANDA
for a generic version of Cardizem CD until Andrx receives 180 days of market
exclusivity based on its status as the first to file for approval of such a
product. The Company has asserted affirmative defences based upon the
Company's status as an unsued ANDA submitter and counter-sued Andrx for
anti-trust laws based on the filing of this suit and Andrx' entry into an
alleged collusive agreement with Hoechst Marion Roussel relating to Andrx'
generic Cardizem CD which could result in keeping generic competition from
entering the marketplace in a regular and timely manner.
In March, 1998, the Company commenced an action in the District of New
Jersey against Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft and related parties to recover
damages estimated at $1.2 billion and for injunctive relief for the alleged
violation by the defendants of the anti-trust laws of the United States,
for breach of contract, deceptive trade practices and restraint of trade,
unfair competition and other violations for the common law. A reasonable
estimation of the Company's potential recovery for damages cannot be made
at this time.
<PAGE> 41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
15. LITIGATION - CONTINUED
From time to time, Biovail becomes involved in various legal proceedings
which it considers to be in the ordinary course of business. The vast
majority of these proceedings involve intellectual property issues that
often result in patent infringement suits brought by patent holders upon
the Company's filing of its ANDA applications. The timing of these actions
is mandated by statute and may result in a delay of FDA's approval for such
filed ANDAs until the final resolution of such actions or the expiry of 30
months, whichever occurs earlier. The Company is currently litigating two
separate actions for alleged infringement of the applicable patents related
to the Company's filing of ANDAs for the generic equivalent of Adalat CC
(30mg) and Procardia XL (30mg and 60mg) products. Both actions make a
technical claim of infringement and, by virtue of applicable statutory
provisions, the filing of these suits may delay approval of the Company's
ANDAs for a period of 30 months or resolutions of these patent infringement
questions, which ever occurs sooner. The Company is vigorously defending
these suits by denying infringement of the patents. In addition, the
Company has brought an action against the patent holders for violation of
the anti-trust laws and for tortious interference with the Company's
perspective business advantage.
16. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ARRANGEMENTS
Intelligent Polymers Limited ("IPL")
IPL was formed by the Company in July, 1997. In September, 1997, the
Company concluded a development and license agreement (the ''Development
Contract'') and a services agreement with IPL, whereby the Company develops
on IPL's behalf once-daily controlled release branded generic versions of
designated products. In October, 1997, IPL completed a public offering of
3,737,500 units resulting in net proceeds to IPL before offering expenses
of approximately $69,500,000.
The proceeds of the offering will be used by IPL primarily to make payments
to the Company under the Development Contract. The Development Contract
provides for the Company to conduct product development in respect of the
designated products. Such costs shall be computed with respect to internal
costs incurred by the Company at its fully absorbed cost plus a mark-up,
consistent with contractual relationships the Company has with other third
parties.
Revenue received by the Company from IPL pursuant to the Development
Contract in the year ended December 31, 1997, included: i) an initial
payment of $3.5 million for access to and use by IPL of the Company's
proprietary technology in connection with product development, and ii)
payments of $6.1 million for product development.
<PAGE> 42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
16. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ARRANGEMENTS - CONTINUED
The Company, as the holder of all of the issued and outstanding special
shares of IPL, has an option, exercisable at its sole discretion, to
purchase all, but not less than all, of the outstanding common shares of
IPL commencing on the closing date of the offering and ending on the
earlier of (i) September 30, 2002, or (ii) the 90th day after the date
IPL provides the Company with quarterly financial statements showing cash
or cash equivalents of less than $3 million. If the purchase option is
exercised, the purchase price calculated on a per share basis would be as
follows:
Purchase Option
Exercise Price
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Before October 1, 2000 $ 39.06
On or after October 1, 2000 and on or before September 30, 2001 48.83
On or after October 1, 2001 and on or before September 30, 2002 61.04
</TABLE>
The purchase option exercise price may be paid in cash or the Company's
common shares, or any combination of the foregoing, at the Company's sole
discretion.
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
In December 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with a subsidiary
of Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. ("Teva") for the development and
marketing of twelve generic oral controlled release products. Eight of the
twelve products have been identified and at December 31, 1997, four had
been filed with the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA").
The Company will incur all costs and expenses for the development and
registration for the eight identified products. The Company and Teva will
jointly select and share equally the costs associated with the development
and registration for the four unidentified products.
Under the terms of the agreement, Teva is obligated to pay the Company an
aggregate of $34.5 million, subject to certain milestones. Of the $34.5
million, $23.5 million relates to reimbursement of research and
development fees and $11.0 million for the initial purchase of product.
Revenue received by the Company from Teva pursuant to the agreement in the
year ended December 31, 1997, included $10.0 million reimbursement of
research and development costs and $6.0 million of product sales.
<PAGE> 43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
17. SEGMENTED INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company considers that its operations fall principally into one class --
the development, manufacture, and sale of pharmaceutical products. The
Company's revenue, profitability and assets by geographic area for the year
ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE
Canada $ 28,819 $ 19,585 $ 6,952
Switzerland 6,665 6,433 6,242
Puerto Rico and Barbados 70,729 58,588 10,120
-------- -------- --------
106,213 84,606 23,314
Less intersegment (23,834) (18,176) (3,670)
-------- -------- --------
$ 82,379 $ 66,430 $ 19,644
======== ======== ========
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
Canada $ (935) $ (6,153) $ (6,720)
Switzerland 3,929 4,167 2,571
Puerto Rico and Barbados 34,539 25,592 6,702
-------- -------- --------
37,533 23,606 2,553
Other (expense) income, net
of income taxes (2,292) (322) 3,317
-------- -------- --------
Net income $ 35,241 $ 28,284 $ 5,870
======== ======== ========
TOTAL ASSETS
Canada $ 41,285 $ 26,357 $ 21,675
Switzerland 8,005 7,214 9,467
Puerto Rico and Barbados 44,449 25,035 29,725
-------- -------- --------
$ 93,739 $ 58,606 $ 60,867
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Major Customers:
In 1997, Forest Laboratories Inc., Teva and IPL accounted for 46%, 19% and
12% of total revenue, respectively.
18. UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted accounting principles ("Cdn. GAAP") which conforms in all
material respects applicable to the Company, with those in the United States
("U.S. GAAP") during the periods presented except with respect to the
following:
a) Reconciliation of net income under Cdn. and U.S. GAAP
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income under Cdn. GAAP $ 35,241 $ 23,284 $ 5,870
U.S. GAAP adjustments
Collection of warrant
subscription receivable (750) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net income according to U.S. GAAP $ 34,491 $ 23,284 $ 5,870
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
18. UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES -CONTINUED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------- ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings per share under U.S. GAAP
Basic $1.35 $0.92 $0.23
Fully diluted $1.30 $0.86 $0.22
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding under U.S. GAAP
Basic 25,606 25,378 24,993
Fully diluted 26,619 26,932 26,674
</TABLE>
In February, 1997, the Financial Account Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 ("SFAS No. 128"),
"Earnings Per Share", which requires presentation of basic and diluted
earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share
reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common
stock. As required, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 128 in
the year ended December 31, 1997. All prior period weighted average and per
share information has been restated in accordance with SFAS No. 128. The
computation of diluted earnings per share does not include stock options and
warrants with dilutive potential that would have an antidilutive effect on
earnings per share.
b) The components of shareholders' equity under U.S. GAAP are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Share capital $18,465 $14,614
Warrants 8,244 -
Warrants subscription receivable (7,494) -
Retained earnings 57,203 22,712
Cumulative translation adjustment (960) (383)
------- -------
$75,458 $36,943
======= =======
</TABLE>
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company would record in paid-up capital an amount
equal to the proceeds attributable to Warrants as determined at the time
of their issuance along with an offsetting contra equity account,
"Warrant subscription receivable". Under Cdn. GAAP, the offsetting
amount would be recorded as a reduction in retained earnings.
c) Under U.S. GAAP, the following additional supplemental cash flow
disclosure would be provided:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------- ------ -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash paid for:
Interest $ 691 $ 608 $ 827
Income taxes 1,736 603 69
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
18. UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES -- CONTINUED
d) Under U.S. GAAP, the following additional disclosure would be provided
pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 109 - "Accounting for Income
Taxes":
As at December 31, 1997, the Company has unused tax benefits of
approximately $10,497,000 related to net operating loss and tax credit
carry forwards all of which relate to the Canadian operations. Under
U.S. GAAP, a valuation allowance of an equivalent amount would be
recognized to offset the related deferred tax asset due to the
uncertainty of realizing the benefit of the loss and tax credit carry
forwards.
The net change in the valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset was
a decrease of $214,000 in 1997, and an increase of $2,982,000 and
$1,780,000 in the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
e) The Company does not recognize compensation expense for its employee
stock-based compensation plans. Had compensation cost for the employee
stock option plans been determined based upon fair value at the grant
date for awards under these plans consistent with the methodology
prescribed under SFAS No. 123 - "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", the Company's net income and earnings per share would have
been reduced by approximately $4,218,000, $3,213,000 and $1,035,000 or
$0.16, $0.13 and $0.04 per share in the years 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 1997, 1996 and
1995, respectively; dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 43%,
risk-free interest rate of 5.7% and expected lives of an average of 4
years.
f) There were no impairment write-downs related to goodwill, product rights,
or fixed assets required under U.S. GAAP.
g) New statements of Financial Accounting Standards
In June, 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income", which establishes standards for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components (revenue, expenses, gains and
losses) in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. The
Statement requires all items that are required to be recognized under
accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported
separately from the Company's accumulated deficit balance in a financial
statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial
statements. The Statement is effective for the Company's December 31,
1998 financial statements. The Company does not anticipate that the
implementation of this Statement will have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
In June, 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information." The Statement establishes
standards for the way that a public business enterprise reports
information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued
to shareholders. It also establishes standards for related disclosures
about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The
Statement is effective for the Company's December 31, 1998 financial
statements. The Company does not anticipate that the implementation of
this Statement will have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
<PAGE> 46
COMMON SHARE INFORMATION
PRINCIPAL MARKETS
The common shares of the Company are listed on the New York Stock Exchange
("NYSE") and on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSE") under the symbol "BVF". The
following table sets out the high and low closing prices for the common shares
for the calendar quarters shown below.
New York Exchange/American Stock Exchange - U.S.$
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 High Low 1996 High Low
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1st Quarter 29.88 21.25 1st Quarter 30.75 21.75
2nd Quarter 32.63 20.88 2nd Quarter 40.00 22.50
3rd Quarter 30.13 25.44 3rd Quarter 36.88 20.25
4th Quarter 39.06 26.63 4th Quarter 37.25 25.38
</TABLE>
Toronto Stock Exchange - Cdn. $
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 High Low 1996 High Low
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1st Quarter 40.25 28.45 1st Quarter 43.00 29.75
2nd Quarter 46.00 29.00 2nd Quarter 54.50 31.00
3rd Quarter 43.00 35.45 3rd Quarter 50.10 28.25
4th Quarter 56.45 33.45 4th Quarter 50.00 34.50
</TABLE>
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
General
The responsibility to oversee the conduct of the business and to guide
management of Biovail resides with the Board of Directors.
The Directors
The Board consists of eight members, including five officers and three outside
directors. In addition to the Board of Directors, a number of standing
committees have been formed to assist the Directors in their responsibilities.
These committees include the Audit Committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee consists of the Chairman of the Board and two directors,
who are not involved in the day to day operations of the Company. The Audit
Committee assists the Board of Directors by reviewing the Company's internal
controls and auditing procedures, any relevant accounting or regulatory matters
and recommending the appointment of external auditors.
Shareholders Feedback and Concerns
The Company conducts an active shareholder relations program under the
direction of the Chairman and Chief Financial Officer. The program involves
meeting with a broad spectrum of investors, including briefing sessions for
analysts and investment fund managers with respect to reported financial
results and other announcements by the Company.
The Board believes that the Board and its Committees carry out effective
governance of the Company's affairs. The Board will continue to review the
Company's governance practices and will make changes as required.
<PAGE> 47
CORPORATE INFORMATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Eugene N. Melnyk, Chairman of the Board
Bruce D. Brydon
Robert A. Podruzny
Rolf K. Reininghaus
Kenneth C. Cancellara, Q.C., Secretary
Wilfred Bristow
Roger Rowan
Robert Vujea
OFFICERS OF THE CORPORATION
Eugene N. Melnyk, Chairman of the Board
Bruce D. Brydon, Chief Executive Officer
Robert A. Podruzny, President, Chief Operating Officer
Kenneth C. Cancellara, Q.C., Senior Vice President, General Counsel
Rolf K. Reininghaus, Senior Vice President and President Crystaal Corporation
Kenneth G. Howling, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Dr. Isa Odidi, Vice President, Research and Development
John R. Miszuk, Vice President, Controller
Marie Claire Pilon, Vice President, International Marketing
Marc Canton, Vice President, General Manager Contract Research Division
AUDITORS
Deloitte & Touche, Chartered Accountants, Toronto, Canada
BANKERS
Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto, Canada
LEGAL COUNSEL
Cassels, Brock & Blackwell, Toronto, Canada
Cahill, Gordon, Reindel, New York, USA
REGISTRARS and TRANSFER AGENTS
CIBC Mellon Trust Company, Toronto, Ontario
ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, New York, USA
COMMON STOCK
Biovail Corporation International is traded on the New York Exchange in the
United States and the Toronto Stock Exchange in Canada under the symbol BVF.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
The Annual and Special Meeting of shareholders will be held at 10:00 a.m.,
Friday, July 10, 1998 at: The Royal York Hotel, Upper Canada Room,
100 Front Street, Toronto, Ontario.
Graphic Design and Lithography by Marathon Graphics Communications Inc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Please contact Investor relations for additional copies of this report, for the
Annual Report on form 20-F as filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, for Quarterley Reports of the company, or for further
information, please direct your request to:
INVESTOR RELATIONS
Biovail Corporation International
2488 Dunwin Drive
Mississauga, Ontario
Canada L5L 1J9
Phone (416) 285-6000
Fax (416) 285-6499
The Biovail word, logo, Tiazac(R), Viazem, and Crystaal are all trademarks of
the Company which may be registered in Canada, the United States, and certain
other jurisdictions.
<PAGE> 48
BIOVAIL CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
2488 Dunwin Drive
Mississauga, Ontario
Canada L5L 1J9
