<PAGE>
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1997
Registration No. 333-
==============================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
--------------------
POST-EFFECTIVE
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
FORM S-8
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under the Securities Act of 1933
CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
New York 11-2520310
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number)
200A Executive Drive,
Edgewood, New York 11717
(516) 586-5200
--------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN
1992 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN
(Full Title of the Plans)
Theodore J. Martines
Executive Vice President
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
200A Executive Drive
Edgewood, New York 11717
(516) 586-5200
--------------------
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone
number, including area code, of agent for service)
A copy of all communications, including communications sent to the agent
for service should be sent to:
Elliot H. Lutzker, Esq.
Snow Becker Krauss P.C.
605 Third Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10158-0125
(212) 687-3860
--------------------
<PAGE>
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
===============================================================================================================================
Proposed Maximum Proposed
Title of Each Class Offering Maximum Amount of
of Securities to be Amount to be Price Aggregate Registration
Registered Registered Per Share Offering Price Fee
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stock Options 600,000(1) -- -- (5)
250,000(2)
60,000(3)
20,000(4)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Shares, par 121,000(6)(9) $ 1.50 (10) $181,500 $ 62.59
value $.001 per share 216,335(7)(9) $ 2.60 (10) $562,471 $ 193.96
60,000(8)(9) $ 2.03 (10) $121,800 $ 42.00
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Shares, par 179,000(11)(9) $ 1.93 (13) $345,470 $ 119.12
value $.001 per share 1,501(12)(9) $ 1.93 (13) $ 2,896.30 $ .99
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Shares, par 300,000(11) $ 3.05 (15) $915,000 $ 277.27
value $.001 per share 20,000(14) $ 2.00 (16) $ 40,000 $ 12.12
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ....................................................................................................... $ 708.05(17)
===============================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
(1) Represents options granted or to be granted pursuant to the 1995
Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "1995 Plan") of CPI
Aerostructures, Inc.
(the "Registrant").
(2) Represents options granted or to be granted pursuant to the 1992
Employee Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan", and together with the
1995 Plan, the "Plans") of the Registrant.
(3) Represents options granted to consultants outside of the Plans (the
"Consultant Options").
(4) Represents options granted to SBK Investment Partners, an affiliate of
Snow Becker Krauss P.C., counsel to the Company, outside of the Plans
(the "SBK Options").
(5) No registration fee is required pursuant to Rule 457(h)(2).
(6) Shares issuable upon exercise of options previously granted pursuant
to the 1995 Plan.
(7) Shares issuable upon exercise of options previously granted pursuant
to the 1992 Plan.
(8) Shares issuable upon exercise of the Consultant Options.
(9) Includes an indeterminable number of Common Shares which may become
issuable pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the Plans or the
Consultant Options, as the case may be.
(10) Calculated solely for the purpose of determining the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(h)(1) based upon the average exercise price.
(11) Shares issuable upon exercise of stock options available for grant
under the 1995 Plan.
(12) Shares issuable upon exercise of stock options available for grant
under the 1992 Plan.
(13) Calculated solely for the purpose of determining the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(c) based upon the average of the last bid and
asked prices for the Common Shares on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on
September 4, 1996.
ii
<PAGE>
(14) Shares issuable upon exercise of the SBK Options.
(15) Calculated solely for the purpose of determining the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(c) based upon the average of the last bid and
asked prices for the Common Shares on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on
December 10, 1997.
(16) The exercise price of the SBK Options.
(17) Of the $708.05 Total Registration Fee, $418.66 was previously paid by
the Company in connection with the Form S-8 Registration Statement
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 9, 1996.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement of the
Company on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-31481, filed on September 9, 1996)
is intended to cover an increase in the number of options authorized to be
granted under the 1995 Plan from 300,000 to 600,000(the"Options") which will
be used as an incentive for employees to grow with the Company. This
post-effective amendment is also intended to cover the 20,000 options granted
to SBK Investment Partners, an affiliate of Snow Becker Krauss P.C., counsel to
the Company.
The contents of the September 9, 1996 Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (the "Form S-8") except as amended hereby, are incorporated herein by
reference.
PART II
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Item 3. Incorporation of Documents By Reference
The following documents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") by the registrant, CPI Aerostructures, Inc., a
New York corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), are incorporated by reference in
this registration statement.
(1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1996;
(2) The Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB for
the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997 and
September 30, 1997;
II-1
<PAGE>
(3) The description of the Company's Common Shares,
par value $.001 per share, contained in the Company's Registration Statement
on Form 8-A (File No. 1-11398), filed pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Exchange Act, including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating such information;
(4) The Company's Proxy Statement dated April 21,
1997; and
(5) The Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K for
September 9, 1997 and October 9, 1997, as amended.
All documents subsequently filed by the Company pursuant to
Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act, prior to the filing
of a post-effective amendment which indicates that all securities offered have
been sold or which deregisters all securities then remaining unsold, shall be
deemed to be incorporated by reference herein and to be a part hereof from the
date of filing of such documents. Any statement contained in a document
incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed
to be modified or superseded for purposes of this registration statement to
the extent that a statement contained herein or in any other subsequently
filed document which also is incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by
reference herein modifies or supersedes such statement. Any such statement so
modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or
superseded, to constitute a part of this registration statement.
Item 7. Exemption From Registration Claimed.
All restricted shares to be resold pursuant to this Registration
Statement were issued upon exercise of stock options by officers or employees
of the Company. Upon exercise of their options, such persons were afforded all
of the information available in a registration statement. Accordingly,
exemption from registration is claimed under Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 8. Exhibits.
Page in
Sequentially
Numbered
Registration
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit Statement
----------- ---------------------- -----------------
4.1 1992 Employee' Stock Option Plan.(1)
4.2 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan.(2)
4.3 Stock Option Agreement dated January
1, 1995 between the Registrant and
Stanley Wunderlich.(3)
II-2
<PAGE>
4.4 Stock Option Agreement dated January
3, 1996 between the Registrant and
Stanley Wunderlich.(3)
*4.5 Resolutions of the Board of Directors
of the Company dated April 11, 1995
authorizing the grant of the SBK
Investment Partners' Investment Stock
Options.
*5.1 Opinion of Snow Becker Krauss P.C.
*23.1 Consent of Snow Becker Krauss P.C.
(included in Exhibit 5.1 hereto).
*23.2 Consent of Goldstein Golub Kessler &
Company, P.C.
- --------------
* filed with this Amendment
(1) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement
No. 33-49270 on Form S-1, declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 6, 1992.
(2) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.
(3) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form S-8 Registration
Statement (No.333-31481) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on September 9, 1996.
II-3
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets
all of the requirements for filing on Form S-8 and has duly caused this
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the Town of Edgewood, State of New York, on
December 10, 1997.
CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.
By: /s/ Arthur August By: /s/ Theodore J. Martines
--------------------------- -------------------------
Arthur August Theodore J. Martines
Chairman of the Board Executive Vice President
and Chief Executive Officer (principal financial and
(principal executive officer) accounting officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration
Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated
on December 10, 1997.
Signature Title
/s/ Arthur August
- --------------------------- Chairman of the Board and
Arthur August President (principal executive
officer)
/s/ Theodore J. Martines Executive Vice President and
- --------------------------- Director (principal financial
Theodore J. Martines and accounting officer)
* /s/ Stanley Wunderlich Director
- ---------------------------
Stanley Wunderlich
* /s/ Walter Paulick Director
- ---------------------------
Walter Paulick
*/s/ Theodore J. Martines
- ---------------------------
Theodore J. Martines as
Attorney-In-Fact for and
of the above named persons.
II-4
<PAGE>
[SNOW BECKER KRAUSS P.C. LETTERHEAD]
December 15, 1997
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
200A Executive Drive
Edgewood, NY 11717
RE: REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8
Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel to CPI Aerostructures, Inc. (the
"Company"), a New York corporation, in connection with the Company's
post-effective amendment no. 1 to registration statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The
Registration Statement includes (i) an additional 300,000 stock options
authorized to be granted pursuant to the Company's 1995 Employee Stock Option
Plan (the "1995 Plan"); and (ii) 20,000 stock options granted to SBK Investment
Partners, an affiliate of our firm, Snow Becker Krauss P.C. (the "SBK Options").
As counsel to the Company, we have examined the Company's
Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws, records of corporate proceedings, and
such other documents as we have deemed necessary or appropriate as a basis for
the opinions set forth below. In such examination, we have assumed the
genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to
us as originals, the accuracy and completeness of all documents submitted to
us as copies and the authenticity of the originals of such latter documents.
As to any facts material to such opinions which we did not independently
establish or verify, we have relied upon statements or representations of
officers and other representatives of the Company, public officials or others.
Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:
1. The Company has been duly organized, is validly existing,
and in good standing under the laws of the State of New
York.
2. The 300,000 additional stock options issuable under the
1995 Plan have been duly authorized by the Board of
Directors of the Company, and in the case of the Common
Shares issuable upon exercise of the 300,000 additional
options pursuant to the 1995 Plan, they have been duly
authorized and reserved for issuance, and when duly issued
and paid for as contemplated by the Registration Statement,
the Common Shares will be legally issued, fully paid and
non-assessable securities.
II-6
<PAGE>
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
December 11, 1997
Page 2
3. The SBK Options have been duly authorized by the Board of
Directors of the Company, and in the case of the 20,000 Common
Shares issuable upon exercise of the SBK Options, they have
been duly authorized and reserved for issuance, and when
duly issued and paid for as contemplated by the Registration
Statement, the Common Shares will be legally issued, fully
paid and non-assessable securities.
We hereby consent to the reference of our name in the
Prospectus under the caption "Legal Opinion" and to inclusion of this opinion
as Exhibit 5.1 to the Registration Statement and all amendments thereto.
Very truly yours,
/S/ Snow Becker Krauss P.C.
-----------------------------
SNOW BECKER KRAUSS P.C.
II-7
<PAGE>
RESOLVED, that the Company is hereby authorized to grant to SBK Investment
Partners, the nominee for Snow Becker Krauss P.C. (the "Optionee"), outside
of its 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan, a non-qualified stock option to
purchase 20,000 shares of the Company's Common Shares, $.001 par value, at an
exercise price of $2.00 per share (the "Option Agreement"); and it was further
RESOLVED, that the Option agreement may be exercised by the Optionee, in full
or in part, at any time following the date of the next acquisition of a
business by the Company until April 11, 2000 but, in any event, if no
acquisition is made by the Company, the option shall become exercisable on
April 11, 1999 until April 11, 2000;
<PAGE>
[LOGO]
GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER & COMPANY, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
[LOGO]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report
dated February 10, 1997 on the financial statements of CPI Aerostructures Inc.
as of December 31, 1996 and for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 1996 included in the CPI Aerostructures Inc. Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption "experts" in such Prospectus.
/s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler & Company, P.C.
- -------------------------------------------
GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER & COMPANY, P.C.
New York, New York
December 16, 1997
II-8
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS
CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.
930,000 Shares
Common Shares, Par Value $.001
This Prospectus has been prepared by CPI Aerostructures Inc., a
New York corporation (the "Company), for use upon resale of shares of the
Company's common shares, par value $.001 per share (the "Common Shares"), by
certain "affiliates" (as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended) of the Company (the "Selling Shareholders") who have acquired or
may acquire such common shares (the "Common Shares") upon exercise of 250,000
options granted or to be granted under the CPI Aerostructures, Inc. 1992
Employee Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan") and 600,000 options granted or to
be granted under the CPI Aerostructures, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan,
as amended (the "1995 Plan," and together with the 1992 Plan, the "Plans") or
pursuant to stock option agreements with the Company for 80,000 options
outside of the Plans in connection with consulting services rendered to the
Company. The maximum number of shares which may be offered or sold hereunder
is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits or dividends,
recapitalization and other similar changes affecting the Common Shares. It is
anticipated that the Selling Shareholders will offer Common Shares for resale
at prevailing prices on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on the date of sale. See
"Plan of Distribution." The Company will receive none of the proceeds from the
sale of the Common Shares offered hereby. All selling and other expenses
incurred by individual Selling Shareholders will be borne by such Selling
Shareholders.
See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 5 for certain risks of an
investment in the Common Shares.
-------------------------
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR HAS THE COMMISSION
PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS.
ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
-------------------------
The date of this Prospectus is December 16, 1997.
<PAGE>
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any
representations other than those contained in this Prospectus in connection
with any offer to sell or sale of the securities to which this Prospectus
relates and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be
relied upon as having been authorized. Neither the delivery of this Prospectus
nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, imply that there
has been no change in the facts herein set forth since the date hereof. This
Prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell to or a solicitation of any
offer to buy from any person in any state in which any such offer or
solicitation would be unlawful.
--------------------
CPI Aerostructures, Inc. was incorporated in the State of New York
in January 1980 under the name Composite Products International, Inc. The
Company changed its name to Consortium of Precision Industries, Inc. in April
1989 and to CPI Aerostructures, Inc, in July 1992. Its principal executive
offices are located at 200A Executive Drive, Edgewood, New York 11717, and its
telephone number is (516) 586-5200.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and, in accordance
therewith, files reports and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission). Reports, proxy statements and other
information filed by the Company can be inspected and copied at the public
reference facilities maintained by the Commission at Judiciary Plaza, 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the Regional Offices of the
Commission at Seven World Trade Center, New York, New York 10048 and at 500
West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611. Copies can be obtained from the
Commission at prescribed rates by writing to the Commission at 450 Fifth
Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The Company hereby incorporates by reference the documents listed
below:
2
<PAGE>
(a) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996 ("Form 10-KSB").
(b) The Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarters ended March 31,1996, June 30,1997 and September 30,1997 ("Form
10-QSB").
(c) The description of the Company's Common Shares contained in
the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No.0-11398) filed
pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, including any amendment or
report filed for the purpose of updating such information.
(d) The Company's Proxy Statement dated April 21, 1997; and
(e) The Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K for September 9, 1997
and October 9,1997, as amended.
All documents subsequently filed by the Company after the date of
this Prospectus pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, and 15(d) of the
Exchange Act shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference herein and to be
a part hereof from the date of filing of such documents. Any statement
contained in a previously filed document incorporated by reference herein
shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Prospectus
to the extent that a statement herein modifies or supersedes such statement;
and any statement contained herein shall be deemed to be modified or
superseded to the extent that a statement in any document subsequently filed,
which is incorporated by reference herein, modifies or supersedes such
statement. Any statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except
as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this Prospectus.
The Company will provide without charge to each person, including any
beneficial owner, to whom a copy of this Prospectus is delivered, upon written
or oral request of such person, a copy of any or all of the information that
has been incorporated by reference in this Prospectus (not including exhibits
to such information, unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by
reference into the information which this Prospectus incorporates). Requests
for copies of such information should be directed to the Company at 200A
Executive Drive, Edgewood, New York 11717; Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Recent Developments
3
<PAGE>
On October 9, 1997, CPI Aerostructures, Inc., a New York
corporation (the "Company"), completed the acquisition (the "Closing") of
Kolar Machine, Inc., an Ithaca, New York corporation (the "Seller"). On
September 9, 1997, the Company had entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement
(the "Agreement") with the Seller and the Seller's President pursuant to which
Kolar, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
(the "Buyer"), agreed to acquire certain tangible and intangible assets
associated with the business (the "Business") of the Seller. The Seller has
been engaged in the business of precision machining and assembly
manufacturing, servicing the electronics industry, including computer and
microwave device manufacturers, as well as the materials handling, aerospace
and banking industries. Upon the Closing, the Seller ceased to operate the
Business, which was reconstituted as a new business of the Buyer.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, at the Closing the Buyer
paid to the Seller $9,400,000 in immediately available funds by wire transfer
and issued its $4,000,000 promissory note to the Seller (the "Note"). In
addition, pursuant to the Agreement, the Buyer separately purchased from the
Seller's President certain real property that he owned and that is associated
with the Business for $1,500,000. The Note is convertible by Seller, in whole
or in part, commencing in February 1998 in no less than 100,000 share
increments into 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company
financed the acquisition of the Business substantially from The Chase
Manhattan Bank and through the exercise of warrants issued in a May 1996
private placement.
4
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
In addition to considering the other information set forth in, or
incorporated by reference into, this Prospectus, prospective investors should
carefully consider the following factors in evaluating an investment in the
Company.
This Prospectus includes forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties, including the timely delivery and acceptance of the
Company's products, the Company's ability to manage its growth and integrate
the operations of Kolar with its aerospace operations, and the other risks
detailed from time to time in the Company's SEC reports.
Cyclicability of the Aerospace Industry. The commercial sector of
the aircraft industry experienced one of the most severe downturns in its
history from 1993 to 1995 characterized by bankruptcies and consolidations
among the major airlines. Permanent reductions in capital spending for the
military and current decreased demand for commercial aircraft, resulting in
contract cancellations or "stretch outs" (an extension of a program period of
performance resulting in extensions of delivery dates), materially adversely
affected the Company's operating results in 1994 and 1995. Although the Company
has operated profitably during 1996 and 1997 the aerospace industry remains
cyclical and there can be no assurance the industry will not experience another
downturn which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Ability to Manage Growth. The Company acquired Kolar in October
1997 and intends to continue to expand its current level of operations. Kolar
has reported higher revenues than the Company for the most recent fiscal
years. The Company's rapid growth is expected to place significant demands on
the Company's management, technical, financial and other resources. In
addition, successful expansion of the Company's operations will depend on,
among other things, its ability to attract, hire and retain skilled management
and other personnel, secure adequate
5
<PAGE>
sources of products on commercially reasonable terms and successfully manage
growth, none of which can be assured. To manage growth effectively, the
Company will need to improve operational, financial and management information
systems, procedures and controls. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to manage its future growth effectively, and failure to do so
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and/or operating results. See "Recent Developments" and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" in the Company's Form 10-KSB and Form 10-QSB.
Integration of Acquisition. A key component of the Company's
future success depends upon its ability to combine the operations of Kolar
into a vertically integrated company. While the Company and Kolar operate in
different industries there are operating efficiencies to be achieved by the
combined entities through combined management, technical, informational and
financial resources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able
to effectively integrate Kolar with its own operations, and failure to do so
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and/or operating results. See "Recent Development" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in
the Company's Form 10-KSB and Form 10-QSB.
Leverage. The Company incurred a substantial amount of
indebtedness in connection with its acquisition of Kolar and its refinancing
with its senior lender in October 1997. The Company remains leveraged and its
present debt service requirements are substantial. The effect of such leverage
may negatively impact, without limitation, the ability of the Company (i) to
obtain additional financing on favorable terms; (ii) to service existing debt;
and (iii) to comply with financial and other covenants and operating
restrictions imposed under the terms of its existing long-term indebtedness.
The ability of the Company to satisfy such obligations will
primarily depend upon the future financial and operating performance of its
operating subsidiaries and upon the Company's ability to renew or refinance
bank borrowings and/or to revise additional equity capital. The Company's
future performance is dependent upon financial, business and other economic
factors affecting the Company and the economy in particular, many of which are
beyond the control of the Company and its subsidiaries. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Liquidity and Capital Resources" in the Company's Form 10-KSB and Form 10-QSB.
6
<PAGE>
Dependence on Rohr
For the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, sales of the
Company's products to Rohr, Inc. ("Rohr") and The Nordam Corporation
("Nordam") accounted for approximately 89% and 75%, respectively, of the
Company's revenues. Rohr curtailed its operations during the last several
years as a result of a general downturn in the commercial aircraft industry
and the loss of military business before it was sold to B.F. Goodrich Aerospace.
The Company's contract with Rohr concerning the Raytheon 1000 Executive Jet was
sold to Nordam, which terminated the pylon portion of the contract in
September 1995. There can be no assurance that Rohr, for financial or other
reasons, will not seek to further reduce its level of operations in the future
or that a further decline in the economic prospects of Rohr, which could
result in reduction or deferral of capital expenditures, and either of which
could adversely affect the Company.
The Company's agreements with Rohr are subject to termination at
will by Rohr and require the Company to, among other things, deliver certain
minimum quantities of products pursuant to specific schedules. Termination of
any of the Company's contracts with Rohr or the inability of the Company to
maintain or enter into new contracts would have a material adverse effect on
the Company unless it is able to diversify its operations. For the year ended
December 31, 1996, the Company's three agreements with Rohr and Nordam for the
production of sub-assemblies for the McDonnell Douglas MD-90, the Boeing 757
and the Raytheon 1000 accounted for approximately 58%, 4% and 12%,
respectively, of the Company's revenues. The Boeing 757 is currently in
production and the Company anticipates additional orders possibly in 1998 when
Rohr is expected to deplete its inventory. The McDonnell Douglas MD-90 program
is currently in production and the Company anticipates orders for this program
will continue into the year ending December 31, 2009. Production of engine
mounts for Nordam under the Raytheon 1000 program continue, but production of
pylons under such program was terminated in September 1995. There can be no
assurance that Rohr and Nordam will purchase additional products under such
agreements or that the Company will obtain additional contracts for programs
similar in scope to those previously obtained. In addition to its dependence
on Rohr, the Company is dependent on sales of the particular aircraft (e.g.,
by Boeing), over which the Company has no control. See "Item 1. Business -
Customers and Contracts" in the Form 10-KSB.
Rescheduling and Early Termination; Fixed-Price Contracts; Cost Overruns
7
<PAGE>
The Company's contracts with Rohr and Nordam are subject to
premature termination and rescheduling. Rohr may, in its sole discretion,
elect to postpone or reschedule product delivery at any time. Delays,
suspension and termination of performance by Rohr under these agreements since
the beginning of 1993, have materially adversely affected the Company's
operating results. The Company had expended significant funds for
non-recurring costs associated with design, tooling and prototype development,
as well as the purchase of component parts used in its operations, which have
been recovered.
Prices under the Company's contracts with Rohr are fixed during
the term of such contracts, subject to price escalation in accordance with
published indices which account principally for materials and labor costs.
Accordingly, the Company is subject to increased risk of loss in the event
production costs are greater than anticipated. Unforeseen events, including
unanticipated production cost overruns and technical and operating
difficulties, could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In the
past, the Company has incurred cost overruns which could not be recovered,
resulting in reduced profitability. Although the Company maintains procedures
to continuously review costs under contracts and takes such steps as it deems
necessary to reduce the Company's exposure to cost overruns, there can be no
assurance that any measures taken will assure completion of a program or that
a completed program will not involve substantially higher than anticipated
costs to the Company, which may reduce its ability to realize profits from
such program. See "Item 1. Business - Customers and Contracts" in the Form
10-KSB.
Dependence on Government Contracts
For the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, 7% and 24%,
respectively, of the Company's revenues were derived from United States
Government military contracts. Government reductions in capital expenditures
for the military significantly decreased production of new aircraft during the
last several years. However, the reductions in military budgets for new
aircraft have not affected demand for replacement parts and servicing of aging
military aircraft. The September 1995 awards for the A-10 and C-5 military
contracts have increased the Company's future annual revenues derived from
military contracts. There can be no assurance that future reductions in
military spending will not adversely affect the Company's future operating
results. Termination of the Company's contracts with the United States
Government or the inability to obtain or maintain new contracts could have a
material adverse effect on the Company. Moreover, the Company's operations in
the military sector are subject to
8
<PAGE>
risks, including delay; termination for convenience; reduction or modification
of contracts in the event of changes in the government's policies or as a
result of budgetary constraints; and increased or unexpected costs resulting
in losses, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company. See "Item 1. Business - Customers and Contracts" in the Form 10-KSB.
Competitive Bidding
The Company obtains military contracts through the process of
competitive bidding. Contracts from which the Company has derived and expects
to derive a significant portion of its revenues were obtained through
competitive bidding. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue
to be successful in having its bids accepted or, if accepted, that awarded
contracts will generate sufficient revenues to result in profitability for the
Company. Additionally, inherent in the competitive bidding process is the risk
that if a bid is submitted and a contract is subsequently awarded, actual
performance costs may exceed the projected costs upon which the submitted bid
or contract price was based. To the extent that actual costs exceed the
projected costs on which bids or contract prices were based, the Company's
profitability could be materially adversely affected. See "Item 1. Business -
Customers and Contracts; and Marketing" in the Form 10-KSB.
Possible Fluctuations in Operating Results
The Company's sales cycle, which generally commences at a time a
prospective customer issues a request for a proposal and ends with the award
of a contract with that customer, typically ranges from six months to one
year. The period from the time of execution of the contract until completion
of one or more pre-production phases of such contract (i.e., design, tooling
and prototype development), during which time the Company recognizes revenue,
typically ranges from two to three years. The Company's production cycle,
which generally commences at the time the Company orders component parts and
ends upon shipment of the final assembly, generally ranges from six to
eighteen months. The principal factors affecting production scheduling are the
length of time required to procure component parts and the customer's desire
to accelerate or stagger delivery schedules. Pursuant to the Company's
contracts with Rohr, the Company is not entitled to receive cash payments
until products are shipped. The Company recognizes revenue as costs are
incurred under such contracts based upon the percentage of completion method
of accounting, which is measured by the percentage of actual costs
9
<PAGE>
incurred to date against estimated total costs. Accordingly, revenues may be
recognized by the Company even though associated cash payments have not been
received. To the extent that estimated costs of completion increase or
progress under a contract is otherwise impeded, revenue recognition may be
adversely affected. Furthermore, since provision for estimated losses on
uncompleted contracts is made in the period in which such losses are
determined, the Company's recorded revenues may be written-off in later
periods in the event the Company's cost estimates prove to be inaccurate or a
contract is terminated. There can be no assurance that such factors will not
cause significant fluctuations in operating results.
In fact, upon the termination of the pylon portion of the Hawker
1000 contract in September 1995, the Company incurred a charge against cost of
goods sold of $1,473,000. This charge was based, on its impact on past
revenues using the percentage of completion method of accounting. In the event
that such recovery is for a lesser amount than to what the Company believes it
is contractually entitled to, the Company would incur an additional charge.
See "Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis" and "Item 7. Note 1 of
Notes to Financial Statements" in the Form 10- KSB.
Dependence on Third Party Suppliers and Manufacturers
The Company purchases substantially all of its supply of raw
materials, principally metals and special parts, and component parts
incorporated into its products, from third-party suppliers and manufacturers.
The Company believes that there are numerous available sources of supply for
the Company's raw materials. While the Company attempts to maintain
alternative sources for the Company's raw materials, the Company's business is
subject to the risk of price fluctuations and periodic delays in delivery of
raw materials. Failure by certain suppliers to continue to supply the Company
with raw materials on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, would have a
material adverse effect on the Company. The Company has subcontracted
production of substantially all component parts incorporated into its products
to third party manufacturers. Accordingly, the Company is substantially
dependent on the ability of such manufacturers, among other things, to meet
stringent performance and quality specifications and to conform to delivery
schedules. Failure by the Company's manufacturers to comply with these and
other requirements would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Furthermore, there can be no assurance that such manufacturers will dedicate
sufficient production capacity to satisfy the Company's requirements for
component parts within scheduled
10
<PAGE>
delivery times. The Company from time to time is required to purchase special
parts from sole suppliers and manufacturers. The Company generally does not
maintain supply agreements with its suppliers or manufacturers and purchases
raw materials and component parts pursuant to purchase orders in the ordinary
course of business. Failure or delay by suppliers and manufacturers in
supplying necessary raw materials and components to the Company would
adversely affect the Company's profit margin and the Company's ability to
obtain and deliver products on a timely and competitive basis. See "Item 1.
Business - Raw Materials, Suppliers and Manufacturers" in the Form 10-KSB.
Competition; Technological Changes
The markets for the Company's products are highly competitive. The
Company competes with numerous well-established foreign and domestic
subcontractors engaged in the supply of aircraft parts and assemblies to the
commercial and military sectors of the aircraft industry, most of which
possess substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other
resources than the Company and have established reputations for success in the
development, manufacture, sale and service of products. The Company also faces
competition from foreign and domestic prime contractors, including Rohr, all
of whom possess greater resources than the Company, thereby permitting such
companies to implement extensive production programs in response to orders
from aircraft manufacturers. The market for commercial aircraft is dominated
by The Boeing Company, McDonnell Douglas Corporation and Airbus Industries, a
government supported European aircraft consortium, which typically contract
production of assemblies to a limited number of large commercial contractors.
Consequently, the Company's ability to increase market penetration in the
commercial sector may be limited by the relatively small number of prime
contractors in this market.
In addition, the markets for the Company's services and products
are characterized by technological changes. The Company's ability to compete
successfully depends, in large part, on the Company having a technically
competent staff and quality control procedures and on the Company's ability to
adapt to technological changes and advances in the aircraft industry,
including ensuring continuing compatibility with evolving requirements of its
customers and aircraft manufacturers. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to continue to keep pace with the technological demands
of the marketplace or successfully enhance its services and products to be
compatible with products of specific aircraft manufacturers. See "Item 1.
Business - Competition" in the Form 10-KSB.
11
<PAGE>
Potential Products Liability and Warranty Expense
The Company may be exposed to potential significant products
liability claims although it has not been sued to date. The Company maintains
a $2 million general liability insurance policy, a $10 million products
liability insurance policy, and a $5 million umbrella liability insurance
policy, which it believes is adequate coverage for the types of products
presently marketed. There can be no assurance, however, that such insurance
will be sufficient to cover potential claims or that the present level of
coverage will be available in the future at reasonable cost. A partially
insured or a completely uninsured successful claim against the Company could
have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company generally warrants
its products to be free from defects in materials, workmanship and
manufacturing processes for a specified period, generally limited to three
years from the date of shipment. There can be no assurance that future
warranty expenses will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Under the Company's agreements with Rohr, the Company has agreed
to indemnify Rohr for any costs, damages, expenses or other loss or liability
incurred or paid (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of any
asserted claims made against Rohr, for parts supplied by the Company, provided
that such claims do not arise out of the sole fault of Rohr. There can be no
assurance that the Company will not be required to indemnify Rohr in the event
of an adverse claim made against Rohr or that it will have the financial or
other resources to do so. Moreover, to the extent the Company assumes design
responsibility for products in the future, the Company could be required to
obtain a higher level of insurance in order to cover possible design defects.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain a
significantly increased level of coverage on commercially reasonable terms,
which could limit the Company's ability to expand its operations. See "Item 1.
Business Insurance" in the Form 10-KSB.
Potential Liability; Government Regulation
The Company's operations require the use of a limited amount of
chemicals and other materials for painting and cleaning, including solvents
and thinners, that are classified under applicable laws as hazardous chemicals
and substances. The Company does not maintain environmental impairment
insurance. There can be no assurance that the Company will not incur
environmental liability arising out of the use of hazardous
12
<PAGE>
substances. To date, the Company has not incurred any such liability. The use
of hazardous substances is subject to extensive and frequently changing
federal, state and local laws and substantial regulation under these laws by
governmental agencies, including the United States Environmental Protection
Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, various state
agencies and county and local authorities acting in conjunction with federal
and state authorities. Among other things, these regulatory bodies impose
requirements to control air, soil, and water pollution, to protect against
occupational exposure to such chemicals, including health and safety risks,
and to require notification or reporting of the storage, use and release of
certain hazardous chemicals and substances. The Company believes that it is in
substantial compliance with all material federal, state and local laws and
regulations governing its operations and has obtained all licenses and permits
required for the operation of its business.
Amendments to statutes and regulations and/or the Company's
operations in the future could require the Company to continually modify or
alter methods of operations at costs which could be substantial and could
subject the Company to increased regulation. There can be no assurance that
the Company will be able, for financial or other reasons, to comply with
applicable laws and regulations. Failure by the Company to comply with
applicable laws and regulations could subject the Company to civil remedies,
including fines and injunctions as well as potential criminal sanctions, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company. See "Item 1. Business -
Government Regulation" in the Form 10-KSB.
Federal Aviation Administration Regulation and Quality Control Standards
The manufacture of commercial aircraft is subject to extensive
regulation by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") and foreign
regulatory authorities. Under the FAA requirements, each aircraft is required
to undergo a stringent certification process pursuant to which it is inspected
for conformity with specifications and manufacturing processes and tested for
safety, airworthiness and design characteristics. Upon receipt by an aircraft
manufacturer of a production certificate issued by the FAA for a new aircraft,
such manufacturer is required to assure that its suppliers comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. Under FAA implementation of such regulations,
each supplier, including the Company, is subject to periodic FAA surveillance
and investigation. As a result, each manufacturer places contractual
obligations upon
13
<PAGE>
each of its suppliers requiring such suppliers to comply with the FAA
regulations. In order to assure compliance with FAA regulations, the Company's
customers impose quality control standards upon the Company which incorporate
the FAA requirements. These requirements are also incorporated into the
inspection criteria and data to be supplied to the Company's customers
pursuant to the Company's contracts. Among other things, the Company is
required to inspect parts, maintain back-up documents from its suppliers
relating to materials and processes and prepare documentation in order to
substantiate all of the foregoing. In addition, the Company's customers
require the Company to qualify as an approved supplier. In order to so
qualify, the Company is required to satisfy stringent quality control
standards and undergo extensive in-plant inspections of the Company's
personnel, production processes, equipment and quality control systems.
Although the Company's efforts are devoted to ensure that its capabilities and
quality control standards meet its customers' requirements, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to comply with quality control
standards, that the Company's customers will comply with the FAA's or aircraft
manufacturers' requirements, or that the Company will be able, for financial
or other reasons, to qualify as an approved supplier for its existing and
prospective customers. See "Item 1. Business - Operations" in the Form 10-KSB.
Limited Marketing Capability
The Company has limited marketing capabilities and resources. To
date, substantially all of the Company's commercial marketing activities have
been conducted by members of Management. Such activities have consisted
primarily of personal contact with potential customers. Because of the nature
of the Company's business, Management will continue to devote a substantial
amount of time developing and maintaining continuing personal relationships
with the Company's customers. The Company's growth prospects, outside of
Kolar, will be largely dependent upon the Company's ability to achieve greater
penetration of the commercial aircraft market and an up-swing in military
procurement. Achieving market penetration will require significant efforts by
the Company to create awareness of and demand for the Company's services.
Accordingly, the Company's ability to build its client base will be limited by
the number of marketing personnel and will be dependent on the efforts of such
individuals. See "Item 1. Business - Marketing" in the Form 10-KSB.
14
<PAGE>
Lack of Patents; Trademarks and Proprietary Protection
None of the Company's current assembly processes or products are
protected by patents. The Company relies on proprietary know-how and
confidential information and employs various methods to protect the processes,
concepts, ideas and documentation associated with its products. However, such
methods may not afford complete protection and there can be no assurance that
others will not independently develop such processes, concepts, ideas and
documentation. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
adequately protect its trade secrets or that other companies will not acquire
information which the Company considers to be proprietary.
In March 1994, the Company determined that it would be prudent to
protect its reputation in the aircraft structural products market. It applied
for, and received, trademark protection from the United States Patent and
Trademark Office as to the use of its name and logo. See "Item 1. Business
Proprietary Information" in the Form 10-KSB.
Control by Current Shareholders
Arthur August and Theodore J. Martines, President and Executive
Vice President, respectively, of the Company, and their affiliates,
beneficially own approximately 22% of the Company's outstanding Common Shares,
including the exercise of currently exercisable stock options. Accordingly, as
the two largest shareholders in the Company, Messrs. August and Martines and
their affiliates may be able to elect all of the Company's directors; increase
the authorized capital; dissolve, merge, or sell the assets of the Company;
and generally direct the affairs of the Company. See "Shares Eligible for
Future Sale" below; and "Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and
Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act," "Item 11.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Item 12.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Form 10-KSB.
Dependence on Key Personnel
The success of the Company is largely dependent on the personal
efforts of Arthur August, Theodore J. Martines, Daniel Liguori, President of
Kolar and other key employees. Although each of the three officers is employed
under a three-year employment agreement, the loss of the services of such
individuals would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and
prospects. The Company currently maintains "key
15
<PAGE>
man" life insurance on the life of Mr. Liguori in the amount of $8,000,000
(payable to Chase Manhattan Bank).
No Dividends
To date, the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its Common
Shares and does not expect to declare or pay any cash or other dividends in the
foreseeable future. See "Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related
Shareholder Matters - Dividend Policy" in the Form 10-KSB.
Shares Eligible for Future Sale
The Company had 7,674,653 Common Shares outstanding as of
September 30, 1997, of which 3,350,000 shares are deemed to be "restricted
securities," as that term is defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the
Securities Act, in that such shares were issued and sold by the Company in
private transactions not involving a public offering. Of such shares,
1,300,000 are held by Messrs. August and Martines and members of their
families, and are eligible for sale under Rule 144. The remaining 2,050,000
Shares were sold in the June 1996 Private Placement and have been registered
for resale by the investors on a Form S-3 Registration Statement.
Messrs. August and Martines agreed with the Company's former
investment banking consultant (which agreement is in dispute and has been
terminated by the Company), not to sell or otherwise dispose of their shares
prior to January 26, 1998, unless the Company (i) is able to complete an
underwritten secondary public offering, or (ii) obtains $11,000,000 of gross
revenue as shown on its audited financial statements or as shown on a pro
forma basis with any acquired company, for the then current fiscal year, at
which time the lock-up would be terminated. The foregoing lock-up, however, is
exclusive of Rule 144 sales through the Company's former investment banking
consultant, in the amount of $250,000 per annum for Arthur August and $62,500
for Theodore Martines (which increases to $250,000 per annum should Mr.
Martines retire).
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, subject to the
satisfaction of certain other conditions, a person, including an affiliate of
the Company (or person whose shares are aggregated), who has owned restricted
Common Shares beneficially for at least one year is entitled to sell, within
any three-month period, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of
1% of the total number of outstanding shares of the
16
<PAGE>
same class or, if the Common Shares are quoted on the Nasdaq system, the
average weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks preceding the
sale. A person who has not been an affiliate of the Company for at least the
three months immediately preceding the sale and who has beneficially owned
Common Shares for at least two years is entitled to sell such shares under
Rule 144 without regard to any of the limitations described above.
The underwriter for the Company's IPO has two demand registration
statements to register an aggregate of 666,038 shares underlying Underwriters'
Warrants until September 24, 1997 and unlimited piggyback registration rights
until September 24, 1999. These shares have been registered for resale
pursuant to a separate Registration Statement and may be offered for sale. The
Company's former investment banking consultant has one demand registration
statement to register an aggregate of 120,000 Common Shares underlying the
former consultant's options (which agreement is in dispute and has been
terminated by the Company) until January 31, 2000 and unlimited piggyback
registration rights until January 31, 2000.
The Company could register the Common Shares issuable upon
exercise of outstanding stock options at any time in which event such shares
would be immediately eligible for sale.
No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that market
sales of Common Shares or the availability of such shares for sale will have
on the market prices prevailing from time to time. Nevertheless, the
possibility that substantial amounts of Common Shares may be sold in the
public market may adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Common
Shares and could impair the Company's ability to raise capital through the
sale of its equity securities.
Effect of Outstanding Exercisable Securities and Registration Rights
The Company had outstanding options and warrants to purchase Common
Shares exercisable at various prices from $1.00 to $3.00 (subject to adjustment)
pursuant to which an aggregate of approximately 1,474,000 Common Shares may
currently be issued. This includes warrants to the Company's former underwriter,
former investment banking consultant and the Placement Agent to purchase up to
an aggregate of approximately 847,350 Common Shares (subject to adjustment) (the
"Underwriters' Warrants"); and 626,400 employee and consultant stock options
granted as of December 10, 1997.
17
<PAGE>
During the respective terms of the Company's outstanding
derivative securities, the holders thereof may be able to purchase Common
Shares at prices substantially below the then current market price of the
Company's Common Shares with a resultant dilution in the interests of the
existing shareholders. The holders of the Company's derivative securities may
be expected to exercise their rights to acquire Common Shares at times when
the Company would, in all likelihood, be able to obtain needed capital through
a new offering of securities on terms more favorable than those provided by
these outstanding securities. Thus, the terms upon which the Company may
obtain additional financing during the next several years may be adversely
affected. In addition, the exercise of outstanding derivative securities and
the subsequent public sales of Common Shares by holders of such securities
pursuant to a registration statement, including the one for the Shares offered
hereby, effected at their demand, under Rule 144 or otherwise, could have an
adverse effect upon the market for and price of the Company's securities. See
"Description of Securities," "The Offering and Sale of Units," "Shares
Eligible for Future Sale" and "Item 10. Executive Compensation - Stock
Options" in the Form 10-KSB."
Securities Market Factors
In recent years, the securities markets have experienced a high
level of volume volatility and market prices for many companies, particularly
small and emerging growth companies, have been subject to wide fluctuations in
response to quarterly variations in operating results. The securities of many
of these companies which trade in the over-the-counter market, have
experienced wide price fluctuations, which in many cases were unrelated to the
operating performance of, or announcements concerning, the issuers of the
affected stock. Factors such as announcements by the Company or its
competitors concerning technological innovations, new products or procedures,
government regulations and developments or disputes relating to proprietary
rights and factors affecting the aerospace industry generally may have a
significant impact on the market for the Company's securities. General market
price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the
future price of the Company's securities. See "Item 5. Market for Common
Equity and Related Shareholder Matters" in the Form 10-KSB.
18
<PAGE>
SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
The Common Shares to which this Prospectus relates are being
registered for reoffers and resales by Selling Shareholders of the Company who
have acquired or may acquire such shares pursuant to the exercise of options
granted or to be granted under the Plans or pursuant to stock option
agreements with the Company outside the Plans in connection with consulting
services rendered to the Company. The Selling Shareholders named below may
resell all, a portion, or none of such shares.
Participants under the Plans who are deemed to be "affiliates"
of the Company who acquire Common Shares under the Plans may be added to the
Selling Shareholders listed below from time to time by use of a prospectus
supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"). An "affiliate" is defined in Rule 405 under
the Securities Act as a "person that directly, or indirectly, through one or
more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control
with", the Company.
The table below sets forth with respect to each Selling Shareholder,
based upon information available to the Company as of December 10, 1997, the
number of Common Shares beneficially owned before and after the sale of the
Shares offered hereby; the number of Shares to be sold; and the percent of the
outstanding Common Shares owned before and after the sale of the Shares offered
hereby. Each Selling Shareholder's relationship to the Company is set forth in
a footnote to the table.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount and Shares Percent of Class(1)(3)
Nature of Shares Beneficially -----------------------------
Beneficial to be Owned After Before After
Name Ownership(1) Sold(2) Offering Offering Offering
- ----------------------- --------------- -------- -------------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Arthur August(4) 1,210,000(5) 250,000 960,000 15.3% (6) 12.11%
Theodore J. Martines(7) 280,000(8)(9) 155,000 125,000 3.6% (10) 1.6%
Stanley Wunderlich (11) 40,000(12) 40,000 0 1.0% (13) -0-
Walter Paulick (14) 25,000(15) 25,000 0 * -0-
=======
470,000
</TABLE>
* Less than 1%
(1) Unless otherwise noted, the Company believes that each Selling
Shareholder has sole voting and investment power with respect to
all Common Shares beneficially owned, subject to community property
laws, where applicable. Each Selling Shareholder is deemed to be
the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such
person within 60 days from the date of determination upon the
exercise of warrants or
19
<PAGE>
options. The percentage ownership of each Selling Shareholder is
determined by assuming that options or warrants that are held by
such person (but not those held by any other person) and which are
exercisable within 60 days from the date of determination have been
exercised.
(2) Does not constitute a commitment to sell any or all of the stated
number of Common Shares. The number of Shares offered hereby shall
be determined from time to time by each Selling Shareholder at his
sole discretion.
(3) Based on 7,674,653 shares outstanding, but does not give effect to
(i) 641,650 Common Shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of
stock options currently outstanding and an additional 115,000
Common Shares issuable upon exercise of options available for
future grants under the 1995 Plan and 12,836 Common Shares under the
1992 Plan (except those owned or sold by the Selling Shareholder);
and (ii) 20,000 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of options
granted outside of the Company's two stock options plans.
(4) Mr. August, a founder of the Company, has been Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the
Company since January 1980.
(5) Includes 250,000 Common Shares which Mr. August has the right to
acquire within 60 days upon exercise of options granted pursuant to
each of the Company's 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
Company's 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan. Excludes an aggregate of
100,000 Common Shares owned by Mr. August's children or held in
trust for Mr. August's grandchildren, and 9,000 Common Shares owned
by Mr. August's wife, all of which shares Mr. August disclaims
beneficial ownership.
(6) Assumes, pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Exchange Act, that
there are 7,924,653 Common Shares outstanding.
(7) Mr. Martines has been the Executive Vice President,
Secretary/Treasurer and a director of the Company since December
1984.
(8) Includes 155,000 Common Shares which Mr. Martines has the right to
acquire within 60 days upon exercise of options granted pursuant to
the Company's 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan.
(9) Excludes 75,000 Common Shares owned by Mr. Martines' wife and an
aggregate of 60,000 Common Shares held in trust for three children
and two grandchildren of Mr. Martines, as to all of which shares
Mr. Martines disclaims beneficial ownership.
(10) Assumes, pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Exchange Act, that
there are 7,829,653 Common Shares outstanding.
(11) Mr. Wunderlich has been a director of the Company since November
1995.
(12) Includes 40,000 Common shares which Mr. Wunderlich has the right to
acquire within 60 days upon exercise of non-qualified stock options
granted pursuant to the Company's 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan.
20
<PAGE>
(13) Assumes pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Exchange Act, that
there are 7,714,653 Common Shares outstanding.
(14) Mr. Paulick has been a director of the Company since April 1992.
(15) Represents Common Shares which Mr. Paulick has the right to acquire
within 60 days upon exercise of options granted pursuant to the
Company's 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Shares are being sold by the Selling Shareholders for
their own accounts. The Shares may be sold or transferred for value by the
Selling Shareholders, or by pledgees, donees, transferees or other successors
in interest to the Selling Shareholders, in one or more transactions on the
Nasdaq SmallCap market, in negotiated transactions or in a combination of such
methods of sale, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices
related to such prevailing market prices or at prices otherwise negotiated.
The Selling Shareholders may effect such transactions by selling the Shares to
or through brokers-dealers, and such broker-dealers may receive compensation
in the form of underwriting discounts, concessions or commissions from the
Selling Shareholders and/or the purchasers of the Shares for whom such
broker-dealers may act as agent (which compensation may be less than or in
excess of customary commissions). The Selling Shareholders and any
broker-dealers that participate in the distribution of the Shares may be
deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the
Securities Act, and any commissions received by them and any profit on the
resale of the Shares sold by them may be deemed to be underwriting discounts
and commissions under the Securities Act.
There can be no assurance that any of the Selling
Shareholders will sell any or all of the Common Shares offered by them
hereunder.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Common Shares offered hereby has been
passed upon for the Company by Snow Becker Krauss P.C., 605 Third
Avenue, New York, New York 10158-0125. SBK Investment Partners,
21
<PAGE>
an affiliate of Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., owns options to purchase 20,000
Common Shares, at an exercise price of $2.00 per share.
EXPERTS
The financial statements of CPI Aerostructures, Co., Inc. at
December 31, 1996 and for each of the two years in the period ended December
31, 1996 incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1996 in this Prospectus have been included in reliance
upon the report of Goldstein Golub Kessler & Company, P.C., independent
certified public accountants, given upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
22
