<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14(A) INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Management
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(l)(ii), 14a-6(i)(l), 14a-6(i)(2) or
Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[X] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transactions applies:
35,722,124 shares
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:
$2.27
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
$81,089,221
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
$16,218
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously paid:
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
CASINO MAGIC CORP. LOGO
Dear Casino Magic Shareholders:
The Board of Directors of Casino Magic Corp. ("Casino Magic") has approved
a merger which, if completed, will result in Casino Magic becoming a wholly
owned subsidiary of Hollywood Park, Inc., and you receiving a cash payment of
$2.27 for each of your shares of Casino Magic common stock, unless you exercise
your rights to dissent from approving the merger. There are a number of
conditions which must be satisfied before the merger may be completed. The
conditions include the approval of the merger by holders of a majority of the
outstanding Casino Magic shares. As a Casino Magic shareholder, YOUR VOTE IS
VERY IMPORTANT.
A meeting of the Casino Magic shareholders to consider and vote on
approving the merger and to elect directors will be held at the following date,
time and place:
September 9, 1998
2:30 p.m.
9th Floor Casino Magic Hotel
195 East Beach Blvd.
Biloxi, Mississippi 39520
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please take the time to
review the notice of the meeting and proxy statement which accompany this letter
and return your completed proxy indicating how you want your shares voted at the
meeting. If you sign and return your proxy without indicating how you wish your
shares voted at the meeting, your shares will be voted for the re-election of
the current directors, and will be voted for approval of the merger unless you
have provided notice of your intention to exercise your right to dissent from
approving the merger prior to the vote on that matter under the process
discussed in the proxy statement under "Rights of Dissenting Shareholders". In
the latter case, your proxy will abstain from voting your shares as to the
merger. An abstention on the issue of the merger will have the same effect as a
vote against the merger.
The proxy statement provides you with detailed information about the
proposed merger and the reasons your Board of Directors has determined to submit
it for your approval. On behalf of the Board of Directors, I encourage you to
read the entire proxy statement carefully before you decide how to vote your
shares.
Very truly yours,
Marlin F. Torguson
Marlin F. Torguson
Chairman of the Board
<PAGE> 3
CASINO MAGIC CORP. LOGO
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 9, 1998
Notice is hereby furnished to the shareholders of record of Casino Magic
Corp., a Minnesota corporation, (the "Company") as of the close of business on
July 24, 1998, of the annual meeting of the shareholders (the "Meeting")
thereof, to be held on September 9, 1998, at 2:30 p.m. on the 9th floor of the
Casino Magic Hotel, located at 195 East Beach Boulevard, Biloxi, Mississippi,
for the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve an Agreement dated
February 19, 1998, among the Company, Hollywood Park, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and HP Acquisition II, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Hollywood Park, Inc. and the related Plan of
Merger pursuant to which the Company and HP Acquisition II, Inc. would
merge, and each outstanding share of common stock of the Company would
be converted into the right to receive $2.27 in cash;
2. To elect a Board of Directors; and
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting, or any adjournment thereof.
Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 24, 1998,
or their legal representatives, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote per
share of common stock on all matters to be voted on at the Meeting.
A form of proxy, Proxy Statement, Annual Report of the Company for 1997 and
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998
are enclosed herewith. You are requested to complete and sign the form of proxy,
which is being solicited by the Board of Directors and management of the
Company, and to return it in the envelope provided.
August 6, 1998
By Order of the Board of Directors
Marlin F. Torguson
Marlin F. Torguson
Chairman of the Board
<PAGE> 4
PROXY STATEMENT
OF
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
711 CASINO MAGIC DRIVE
BAY SAINT LOUIS, MISSISSIPPI 39520
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 9, 1998
This Proxy Statement is furnished to the shareholders of record as of the
close of business on July 24, 1998, of Casino Magic Corp., a Minnesota
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the annual meeting of the
shareholders thereof (the "Meeting"), to be held on September 9, 1998 at 2:30
p.m. on the 9th floor of the Casino Magic Hotel located at 195 East Beach
Boulevard, Biloxi, Mississippi.
The accompanying form of proxy shall confer upon the appointees named
therein, acting on behalf of the Company's management, authority to vote the
shares represented as follows:
1. For or against approval of an Agreement dated February 19, 1998
(the "Merger Agreement") among the Company, Hollywood Park, Inc.
("Hollywood Park"), a Delaware corporation, and HP Acquisition II, Inc.
("HP Acquisition"), a Minnesota corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
Hollywood Park, and the related Plan of Merger (the "Plan of Merger"),
pursuant to which the Company would merge with HP Acquisition and each
outstanding share of common stock of the Company will be converted into the
right to receive $2.27 in cash;
2. For the election of persons to serve as members of the Board of
Directors to direct the affairs of the Company until the next annual
meeting of the Company's shareholders to be held in 1999; and
3. At their discretion, with regard to matters of which the Company's
management is not presently aware or cannot anticipate, but which may be
properly presented at the Meeting.
THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES FROM THE SHAREHOLDERS IS BEING MADE BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY WHO WILL NOT BE SPECIALLY
COMPENSATED FOR SUCH SOLICITATION. IN ADDITION, THE COMPANY HAS ENGAGED D.F.
KING & CO., INC. TO SOLICIT PROXIES AT A BASE COST OF $4,000, PLUS $3.50 FOR
EACH OF THE COMPANY'S SHAREHOLDERS CONTACTED. BROKERS/DEALERS, NOMINEES,
FIDUCIARIES AND OTHER CUSTODIANS WILL BE REQUESTED TO FORWARD SOLICITING
MATERIALS TO BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK, AND WILL BE
REIMBURSED FOR THEIR REASONABLE OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES INCURRED IN CONNECTION
WITH THAT ACTIVITY. THE COST OF SUCH SOLICITATION, INCLUDING THE COST OF
PREPARING AND MAILING THE NOTICE OF MEETING, PROXY STATEMENT, FORM OF PROXY,
1997 ANNUAL REPORT AND QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, IS
BEING PAID FOR BY THE COMPANY.
THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED AUGUST 6, 1998, AND THE ACCOMPANYING FORM OF
PROXY WERE FIRST MAILED ON APPROXIMATELY AUGUST 7, 1998 TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF
RECORD OF THE COMPANY AS OF THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON JULY 24, 1998.
1
<PAGE> 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
SUMMARY..................................................... 4
The Meeting............................................... 4
The Merger................................................ 4
The Parties to the Merger................................. 5
Certain Tax Consequences of the Merger.................... 6
Dissenter's Rights........................................ 6
The Shareholder Agreement................................. 6
Market Prices............................................. 6
Election of Directors..................................... 6
VOTING AND REVOCATION OF PROXY.............................. 7
PROPOSAL I
APPROVAL OF THE MERGER...................................... 7
General................................................... 8
Recommendation of Board of Directors...................... 8
Background of the Merger.................................. 8
Reasons for the Merger.................................... 10
Subsequent Events......................................... 12
Opinions of the Company's Financial Advisors.............. 15
Opinion of Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc. ............ 15
Opinion of ING Baring Furman Selz LLC.................. 20
Accounting Treatment...................................... 24
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger................ 24
Treatment of Outstanding Options.......................... 24
Procedure for Effecting the Merger........................ 24
Exchange Procedures....................................... 24
Certain Tax Consequences of the Merger.................... 25
THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT.................. 26
General................................................... 26
Representations and Warranties............................ 26
Certain Covenants of the Company.......................... 26
No Solicitation of Competing Acquisition Proposals........ 27
Certain Covenants of Hollywood Park....................... 28
Regulatory Approvals...................................... 28
Other Conditions to the Merger............................ 28
Termination............................................... 29
The Shareholder Agreement................................. 29
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS........................... 30
General................................................... 30
Procedures................................................ 30
Costs and Expenses........................................ 31
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 6
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
PROPOSAL II
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS....................................... 31
Recommendation of Board of Directors...................... 31
Information Concerning Nominees........................... 32
Meetings of the Board of Directors........................ 32
Committees of the Board of Directors...................... 32
Information Concerning Non-Director Executive Officers.... 33
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance... 34
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION...................................... 35
Summary Compensation Table................................ 35
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year..................... 36
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and
Fiscal Year End Option/SAR Values...................... 37
Director Compensation..................................... 37
Employment and Change in Control Arrangements............. 37
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation.......................................... 40
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation... 40
Performance Graph......................................... 43
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS........................................ 43
Indebtedness of Chief Executive Officer................... 43
Legal Services............................................ 44
Employment Contracts with Executive Officers.............. 44
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS...................................... 45
Share Ownership of Management............................. 45
Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.............. 46
Arrangements Which Could Result in a Change in Control.... 46
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS....................................... 46
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS........................................ 47
OTHER MATTERS............................................... 47
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE............. 47
ANNEXES
ANNEX A: PLAN OF MERGER
ANNEX B: MERGER AGREEMENT
ANNEX C: FAIRNESS OPINION OF WASSERSTEIN
ANNEX D: WASSERSTEIN CONFIRMATION LETTER
ANNEX E: FAIRNESS OPINION OF FURMAN SELZ
ANNEX F: FURMAN SELZ CONFIRMATION LETTER
ANNEX G: SECTIONS 302A.471 AND 302A.473 OF THE MINNESOTA
BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE> 7
SUMMARY
The following is a summary of information contained in this Proxy
Statement. Shareholders are urged to read carefully this Proxy Statement,
including the Annexes hereto, in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated or the
context otherwise requires, references to the "Company" are to Casino Magic
Corp., a Minnesota corporation, and its subsidiaries and references to "approval
of the Merger" are to approval of the Plan of Merger set forth as Annex A and
the Merger Agreement set forth as Annex B.
THE MEETING
Date, Time, Place and Purposes of the Meeting. The Meeting will be held on
September 9, 1998, at 2:30 p.m., local time, on the 9th floor of the Casino
Magic Hotel located at 195 East Beach Blvd., Biloxi, Mississippi. At the
Meeting, the shareholders of the Company (the "Shareholders") will consider and
vote to approve the Merger and elect the members of the Company's Board of
Directors. If the merger contemplated by the Plan of Merger occurs (the
"Merger"), each share of the $0.01 par value common stock of the Company (the
"Common Stock") that is outstanding (other than shares of Common Stock as to
which the holder has properly exercised rights to dissent from approving the
Merger) will be converted into the right to receive $2.27 in cash. The current
members of the Company's Board of Directors have been nominated for election at
the Meeting. If the Merger is approved, it is expected that Hollywood Park will
appoint a new Board of Directors for the Company following the effective time of
the Merger.
Record Date. The close of business on July 24, 1998, has been fixed as the
record date (the "Record Date") for the determination of Shareholders entitled
to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. Only holders of record of Common
Stock at the close of business on the Record Date, or their legal
representatives, will be entitled to vote at the Meeting.
Quorum. The presence in person or by properly executed proxy of holders of
at least one-third of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is
required for a quorum at the Meeting.
Votes Required. As of the Record Date, there were 35,722,124 shares of
Common Stock issued and outstanding, each of which will be entitled to one vote
on each matter to be acted upon at the Meeting. The Company has no other class
of equity security authorized and outstanding. The affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the Record
Date are required to approve the Merger. The affirmative vote of a majority of
the shares present or represented by proxy at the Meeting is required for
election of each of the directors and other proposals which may properly be
presented at the Meeting.
Voting Procedures. Only votes cast in person at the Meeting or by proxy
received by the Company before commencement of the Meeting will be counted at
the Meeting. The accompanying proxy is revocable by the Shareholder authorized
to grant such proxy by filing a written notice or a duly executed proxy bearing
a later date with the Company's Secretary or Assistant Secretary prior to the
commencement of the Meeting. Mere attendance at the Meeting is not sufficient to
revoke a proxy.
THE MERGER
If the Merger is approved at the Meeting and the other conditions to
completion of the Merger are satisfied, the Company and HP Acquisition will
merge, with the Company being the surviving corporation and thereby becoming a
wholly owned subsidiary of Hollywood Park. Each outstanding share of Common
Stock, other than those for which the holder has properly exercised dissenter's
rights, will be converted into the right to receive a $2.27 cash payment (the
"Merger Consideration") from Hollywood Park, and the Shareholders will no longer
have any equity interest in the Company. The total amount required to make such
cash payments to the Shareholders, and pay an estimated $5.5 million in
transaction-related fees and expenses, is estimated to be approximately $86.6
million. Hollywood Park has advised the Company that funds for such payments and
expenses are expected to be obtained from cash on hand and through Hollywood
Park's existing credit facility.
4
<PAGE> 8
The Merger will become effective upon the filing of the Articles of Merger
with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Hollywood Park may require such filing to
be delayed until October 31, 1998. After October 31, 1998, either Hollywood Park
or the Company may terminate the Merger if the Articles of Merger have not been
filed, unless the delay is due to a breach of the Merger Agreement on the part
of the terminating party. In addition, the Merger may be further delayed to
March 31, 1999 if the sole unsatisfied condition is the receipt of all required
regulatory approvals. See "THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT," and the
Plan of Merger and Merger Agreement which are included in this Proxy Statement
as Annex A and Annex B.
Promptly following the Merger becoming effective, a paying agent to be
designated by Hollywood Park (the "Paying Agent") will forward to the holders of
certificates formerly evidencing shares of Common Stock instructions for
surrendering the certificates and receiving the $2.27 per share payment. The
Paying Agent will make the payment as promptly as practicable following receipt
of the certificates and other required documents. No interest will be paid on
the $2.27 per share cash payment. STOCK CERTIFICATES SHOULD NOT BE SENT WITH THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD. IF THE MERGER IS CONSUMMATED, SHAREHOLDERS WILL BE
FURNISHED INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXCHANGING THEIR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FOR CASH.
Completion of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
certain conditions contained in the Merger Agreement, including obtaining
certain regulatory approvals, and the exercise of dissenter's rights with
respect to the Merger by holders of no more than 10% of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock. See "THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT" and the copy
of the Merger Agreement which is included in this Proxy Statement as Annex B.
The Merger Agreement prohibits the Company and its subsidiaries, officers,
employees and other agents from directly or indirectly soliciting or otherwise
encouraging third parties to acquire the Company or its assets. However, prior
to the time the Merger is effective, the Company may accept a proposal to
acquire the Company which the Board of Directors believes is superior to the
$2.27 per share cash purchase price, subject to the right of Hollywood Park to
match that proposal. In certain cases, Hollywood Park will have the right to
terminate the Merger Agreement with the Company being required to pay to
Hollywood Park the sum of $3,500,000 if the Merger is not completed, including
by reason of the failure of the Shareholders to approve the Merger on or before
October 31, 1998 or the acceptance by the Company of a competing acquisition
proposal.
THE PARTIES TO THE MERGER
Casino Magic Corp. The Company owns and operates two dockside casinos on
the Mississippi Gulf Coast in Bay Saint Louis and Biloxi, Mississippi, and a
riverboat casino in Bossier City, Louisiana. In addition to its United States
operations, the Company operates and has a 51% ownership in two casinos in
Neuquen and San Martin de los Andes, Argentina. The Company's principal
executive office is located at 711 Casino Magic Drive, Bay Saint Louis,
Mississippi 39520, and its telephone number at that address is (228) 467-9257.
Hollywood Park, Inc. Hollywood Park owns and operates the Hollywood Park
and Turf Paradise thoroughbred racing facilities located in the Los Angeles and
Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan areas, respectively. Through its Boomtown, Inc.
subsidiary, Hollywood Park owns and operates land-based, dockside and riverboat
casinos in Verdi, Nevada, Biloxi, Mississippi and Harvey, Louisiana,
respectively. Hollywood Park also owns two card club casinos located in the Los
Angeles metropolitan area. Hollywood Park's principal executive offices are
located at 1050 South Prairie Avenue, Inglewood, California 90301, and its phone
number at that address is (310) 419-1500.
HP Acquisition II, Inc. HP Acquisition is a Minnesota corporation created
solely for the purpose of the Merger and is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Hollywood Park. The principal executive office of HP Acquisition is located at
1050 South Prairie Avenue, Inglewood, California 90301, and its phone number at
that address is (310) 419-1500.
5
<PAGE> 9
CERTAIN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
The receipt of cash for shares of Common Stock in the Merger will be a
taxable transaction for federal income tax purposes and may also be a taxable
transaction under state, local, foreign or other tax laws applicable to a
Shareholder. Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the
particular tax consequences of the Merger, including the applicability and
effect of state, local, foreign and other taxes. See "APPROVAL OF THE
MERGER -- Certain Tax Consequences to Shareholders."
DISSENTER'S RIGHTS
Shareholders who do not believe the $2.27 per share payment to be made in
connection with the Merger is an adequate payment for their shares of Common
Stock may dissent from approving the Merger and, by following the required
procedures under Minnesota law, pursue receiving a payment of the "fair value"
of their shares. The procedures to be followed include providing the Company
with written notice prior to the Meeting of the Shareholder's intention to
assert dissenter's rights, and not voting in favor of the Merger. Questions
regarding procedures to assert dissenters' rights should be directed to Robert
Callaway, the Company's general counsel at (228) 467-9257. See "RIGHTS OF
DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS" and copies of Sections 302A.471 and 302A.473 of the
Minnesota Statutes included in this Proxy Statement as Annex G.
THE SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT
Marlin F. Torguson, who beneficially owns in the aggregate 7,683,000 shares
of Common Stock, or approximately 21.5% of the total number of issued and
outstanding shares of Common Stock, has agreed to vote his shares in favor of
approval of the Merger. In addition, Mr. Torguson agreed to continue to serve as
an employee of the Company for three years following the Merger, and during such
three-year period not to compete with Hollywood Park or the Company in any
jurisdictions in which either Hollywood Park or the Company operates. Hollywood
Park has agreed to appoint Mr. Torguson to the board of directors of Hollywood
Park if the Merger is completed, and to issue to Mr. Torguson shares and options
to purchase shares of its common stock in connection with his employment. See
"THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT -- The Shareholder Agreement."
MARKET PRICES
Shares of Common Stock are listed and traded on the Nasdaq National Market.
On February 18, 1998, the date preceding public announcement of the execution of
the Merger Agreement, the high, low and closing sales prices of a share of
Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market were $1.8125, $1.6875 and $1.6875,
respectively. On July 31, 1998, the latest practicable trading day before the
printing of this Proxy Statement, the high, low and closing sales prices of a
share of Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market were $2 5/32, $2 1/8 and
$2 1/8, respectively.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Meeting, the Shareholders will also elect the members of the
Company's Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting of the
Shareholders or their earlier resignation or removal from office. The current
members of the Company's Board of Directors have been nominated for election at
the Meeting. If the Merger is completed, it is expected that Hollywood Park will
appoint a new Board of Directors for the Company. See "ELECTION OF DIRECTORS."
6
<PAGE> 10
VOTING AND REVOCATION OF PROXY
There were 35,722,124 shares of Common Stock, and no undesignated shares of
the Company, outstanding as of the July 24, 1998 Record Date. Common Stock is
the Company's only class of voting equity security currently authorized and
outstanding. Each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote with
respect to the approval of the Merger, the election of directors or in the
determination of any other matter brought before the Shareholders at the
Meeting. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. is the transfer agent and registrar for
the Common Stock. Only Shareholders of record as of the close of business on the
Record Date, as certified to by Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., will be entitled
to vote at the Meeting. Only votes cast in person at the Meeting or by proxy
received by the Company before commencement of the Meeting will be counted at
the Meeting. The accompanying form of proxy is revocable by the Shareholder
entitled to grant such proxy by filing a written notice of revocation or a duly
executed proxy bearing a later date with the Company's Secretary or Assistant
Secretary prior to the commencement of the Meeting. Mere attendance at the
Meeting is not sufficient to revoke a proxy.
The presence, in person or by proxy, of Shareholders of record owning at
least one third (or 11,907,375 shares) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock
shall constitute a quorum at the Meeting. The affirmative vote of at least a
majority of the shares outstanding (at least 17,861,063 shares) is required to
approve the Merger. The affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares
held by Shareholders present in person or by proxy at the Meeting is required to
elect each of the person nominated as a director or to approve any other
proposal presented to the shareholders at the Meeting. If a proxy is returned
without specific voting instructions with respect to the Merger, the persons
named in the proxy will vote the shares subject to the proxy in favor of the
proposal to approve the Merger, unless the Shareholder granting the proxy has,
prior to the Meeting, notified the Company in writing of the exercise of the
Shareholders's right to dissent from approving the Merger. If the Shareholder
has so notified the Company, and if no voting instructions are given with
respect to the Merger, the shares subject to the proxy will be voted as an
abstention with respect to the Merger. Where voting instructions are not given
in a proxy with respect to the election of the directors the persons named in
the proxy will vote the shares subject to the proxy in favor of the election of
each of the director nominees named herein. Where voting instructions are not
given in a proxy with respect to granting discretionary authority to vote on
other matters described in the proxy, the persons named in the proxy will vote
for granting such discretionary authority.
If a Shareholder abstains from voting as to any proposal, or if a broker
returns a proxy to the Company indicating a lack of voting instructions from the
beneficial owner of the shares and a lack of discretionary authority on the part
of such broker to vote those shares (referred to as a "broker no-vote"), such
Shareholder and the proxy returned by the broker will be counted as present or
represented at the Meeting only for the purpose of determining the existence of
a quorum. Abstentions with respect to any matter brought to a vote at the
Meeting will be treated as shares voted for purposes of calculating the votes
cast with respect to such matter, but shall not be deemed to have been voted in
favor of such matter. Accordingly, an abstention will have the same effect as
voting against a matter. Broker no-votes with respect to any matter brought to a
vote at the Meeting will be treated as shares not voted for purposes of
determining whether the requisite vote has been obtained.
A copy of the Company's 1997 Annual Report, which includes the consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997,
and a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which includes
unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 1998, were mailed with this Proxy Statement to all Shareholders
entitled to vote at the Meeting. If upon receipt of your proxy materials you
have not received the 1997 Annual Report or the June 30, 1998 Quarterly Report,
please call Casino Magic Shareholder Relations at (228) 467-9257 and copies of
the reports will be sent to you.
PROPOSAL I
APPROVAL OF THE MERGER
The following information with respect to the Merger is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the complete text of the Plan of Merger, a copy of
which is included in this Proxy Statement as Annex A, and the
7
<PAGE> 11
Merger Agreement, a copy of which is included in this Proxy Statement as Annex
B. The following information includes a summary of the material terms of the
Plan of Merger and Merger Agreement, which sets forth the terms and conditions
upon which the Merger is to be effected. If the Plan of Merger and the Merger
Agreement are approved and adopted by the requisite vote of Shareholders at the
Meeting, and all other conditions to the obligations of the parties thereto are
satisfied or waived, the Merger will be consummated and HP Acquisition will
merge with and into the Company. The Company will be the surviving corporation
in the Merger and, will, as a result of the Merger, become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Hollywood Park. The Merger will be effective (the "Effective
Time") as of the filing with the Minnesota Secretary of State of Articles of
Merger containing the Plan of Merger. SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE PLAN OF
MERGER AND MERGER AGREEMENT IN THEIR ENTIRETY FOR A MORE COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF
THE MERGER.
GENERAL
Pursuant to the Plan of Merger, each share of Common Stock issued and
outstanding (other than shares of Common Stock as to which dissenters' rights
are properly asserted) will be converted automatically into the right to receive
the Merger Consideration, which will consist of $2.27 in cash. As a result of
the Merger, holders of shares of Common Stock will cease to have an equity
interest in, or possess any rights as Shareholders.
Hollywood Park has agreed to exchange options to acquire shares of its
common stock for all options to acquire Common Stock granted under the Company's
1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan") and certain additional
options granted outside of the Option Plan outstanding at the Effective Time.
The exercise prices and on other terms of the replacement options will be
determined as provided in the Merger Agreement. See "-- Treatment of Outstanding
Options" below.
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors of the Company is recommending a vote in favor of
approving the Merger.
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER
On February 12, 1997, the Company announced that it had engaged the
investment banking firm of Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc. ("Wasserstein") to
act as a financial advisor to assist the Company in exploring strategic
alternatives aimed at increasing shareholder value, including a consolidation,
sale or other business combination with a third party. Wasserstein prepared a
list of companies and investors that it believed would be interested in
acquiring all of the stock or assets of the Company, or acquiring all or a
portion of the assets or stock of one of its operating entities, and prepared an
information memorandum to be distributed to interested parties which discussed
the business and assets of the Company.
On March 18, 1997, and on March 20, 1997, Grand Casinos, Inc. ("Grand
Casinos") and Hollywood Park, respectively, signed confidentiality agreements
with Wasserstein, as the Company's agent, and were each provided with
information regarding the Company. Over the course of several months,
Wasserstein contacted approximately 35 parties who it believed might have an
interest in entering into a transaction to acquire all or a portion of the
Company or its assets.
On June 12, 1997, Grand Casinos indicated an interest to acquire all of the
outstanding Common Stock at a price which would range from $0.98 to $1.40 per
share, depending upon the results of its review of the Company's business,
business prospects and records. While meetings to facilitate this review were
scheduled, Grand Casinos subsequently cancelled and did not reschedule the
meetings. Similarly, while Hollywood Park had expressed an interest in a
strategic transaction with the Company, it did not actively pursue the matter.
On October 13, 1997, the Company notified Wasserstein that it was discontinuing
its exploration for strategic alternatives, in order to focus management's
attention on operations.
On December 8, 1997, Grand Casinos contacted the Company to initiate
discussions with the Company regarding a potential merger, and on December 9,
1997, reaffirmed its obligations under the March 18, 1997
8
<PAGE> 12
confidentiality agreement. On December 12, 1997, the Company signed a
confidentiality agreement in favor of Grand Casinos. The Company reaffirmed its
engagement of Wasserstein to assist and advise the Company with respect to a
potential merger with Grand Casinos. Discussions were held at various times
during December, primarily between Lyle Berman, Chairman of the Board of Grand
Casinos, and Marlin Torguson, Chairman of the Board of the Company, and on
December 17, 1997, Mr. Berman made a verbal offer to Mr. Torguson to the effect
that Grand Casinos would exchange one share of Grand Casinos' common stock for
every 10 shares of the Common Stock in a merger transaction.
On January 6, 1998, Grand Casinos submitted to the Company a written
proposed to exchange its common stock for the outstanding Common Stock. In that
proposal, the Shareholders would receive Grand Casinos' common stock based on an
exchange ratio which valued the Common Stock at $1.50 per share with the value
of the Grand Casinos' shares being based on the trading prices for such shares
during the several weeks preceding the merger (provided that no more than ten
and not less than 7.33 shares of the Common Stock would be exchanged for each
share of Grand Casinos' common stock). On January 5, 1998, the closing market
price of the Common Stock was $1.296875 per share, and the closing market price
of Grand Casinos' common stock was $13.6875 per share which would have resulted
in an exchange ratio of approximately 9.125 shares of Common Stock for one share
of Grand Casinos' common stock.
On January 8, 1998, the Special Committee of the Board of Directors engaged
the law firm of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley, & McCloy, Los Angeles, California, to
act as its special legal counsel. The Company's Special Committee was originally
formed in February 1995 (then called the Negotiating Committee) to assist and
provide advice to the Board of Directors in connection with a transaction which
may involve a permanent change in control of the Company. See "ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS -- Committees of the Board of Directors."
The Company and Grand Casinos commenced discussions based upon the January
6, 1998 proposal, and began to negotiate the terms of a definitive agreement. On
January 13, 1998, Grand Casinos filed an amendment to a Schedule 13D previously
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing a renewed
evaluation of its investment in 2,125,000 shares of Common Stock in the Company.
In the course of these discussions, Grand Casinos made another written proposal
on January 15, 1998 to acquire 25% of the outstanding Common Stock for $1.60 per
share in cash, and the remaining Common Stock for shares of Grand Casinos'
common stock, based on a ratio of 7.95 shares of the Common Stock for one share
of Grand Casinos' common stock. As proposed, the transaction could have been
terminated if the market price of Grand Casinos' common stock fell to $11.00 or
less for any five day period prior to the consummation of the merger. The
closing market price of Grand Casinos' common stock on January 14, 1998, was
$13.50, giving the offer a value, on that date, of approximately $1.67 per share
for the Common Stock. The closing market price of the Common Stock on January
14, 1998 was $1.875 per share. On January 20, 1998, Grand Casinos filed an
amendment to its Schedule 13D disclosing this proposal. During January,
representatives of the Company and Grand Casinos engaged in due diligence
investigations of the other's business, including inspections of their various
properties.
On January 21, 1998, Hollywood Park made an unsolicited written offer to
acquire the Company. The offer contemplated the exchange of Hollywood Park's
common stock having a value of $1.95, based upon a 10 trading day period
preceding the signing of a definitive agreement, for each share of Common Stock.
The offer also suggested that Hollywood Park would be willing to proceed on a
cash, or part cash and part stock, basis.
On January 23, 1998, the duties, authority and membership of the Special
Committee were redefined and re-established. The membership of the Special
Committee was comprised of two non-employee members of the Board of Directors,
and the Special Committee was given the authority, on behalf of the Board of
Directors, to review, assess, negotiate and agree to the terms of any
change-in-control transaction.
On January 27, 1998, the Board of Directors met with Wasserstein in Bay St.
Louis, Mississippi, to analyze Hollywood Park's offer. On approximately January
29, 1998, the Special Committee notified Grand Casinos that another party had
expressed an interest in the Company at a price then higher than that proposed
by Grand Casinos. On January 30, 1998, the Company's Special Committee, with the
assistance of its special
9
<PAGE> 13
legal counsel, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, and the Company's financial
advisor, Wasserstein, began negotiations with both Hollywood Park and Grand
Casinos.
On February 3, 1998, the Company sent Grand Casinos and Hollywood Park a
letter inviting each to submit a firm offer for an acquisition of the Company
under the general terms of an agreement submitted to each with the letter. The
February 3, 1998 letter established a deadline of 12:00 p.m. on February 10,
1998 for Grand Casinos and Hollywood Park to submit their offers. That deadline
was extended to February 13, 1998, with the requirement that the offers remain
open until 6:00 p.m. on February 17, 1998. On February 13, 1998, the Company
received offers from both Hollywood Park and Grand Casinos, along with executed
marked-up definitive agreements. The offer of Hollywood Park was $2.10 per share
in cash, and the offer of Grand Casinos was 0.13245 shares of Grand Casinos'
common stock for each share of the Company's Common Stock. Based upon the
closing stock price of $14.75 per share on February 12, 1998, Grand Casinos'
offer equated to $1.95 for each share of Common Stock.
On February 17, 1998, the Special Committee engaged ING Baring Furman Selz
LLC ("Furman Selz") to advise it regarding the fairness of the proposed
transaction to the Shareholders. The Company's Board of Directors and the
Special Committee met independently on February 17, 1998 with their respective
financial advisors, Wasserstein and Furman Selz, both of whom discussed with the
Board of Directors or the Special Committee their analysis of the fairness of
the Hollywood Park offer to the Shareholders from a financial point of view.
On February 17, 1998, after being informed that the Company intended to
accept the offer of Hollywood Park, Grand Casinos, through its investment
banking firm, verbally informed the Company that it would increase its offer to
$2.25 per share. In light of that verbal offer, the Board of Directors and
Special Committee determined that it must solicit new bids. The Company then
established 12:00 p.m. on February 19, 1998 as the time for Hollywood Park and
Grand Casinos to resubmit their final bids. At the February 19 deadline, the
Company received definitive agreements executed by both Grand Casinos and
Hollywood Park, offering respectively, in cash, $2.25 and $2.27 per share, for
the outstanding Common Stock. The closing market price for the Common Stock on
February 18, 1998, was $1.6875.
On February 19, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors and the Special
Committee again met independently with their respective financial advisors, each
of whom delivered a fairness opinion that the Hollywood Park offer of $2.27 per
share of Common Stock was fair to the Shareholders from a financial point of
view. The Company accepted the offer of Hollywood Park and executed the Merger
Agreement on February 19, 1998.
On July 30, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors and Special Committee
asked Wasserstein and Furman Selz to review the Company's financial results of
operations since February 1998, as discussed under "Subsequent Events" below,
and to provide the Board of Directors and Special Committee with confirming
fairness opinions. On August 4, 1998, prior to the mailing of this Proxy
Statement to the shareholders, Wasserstein and Furman Selz confirmed their
opinions to the Board of Directors and Special Committee, respectively, that the
$2.27 per share price for the Common Stock was fair to the Shareholders from a
financial point of view.
REASONS FOR THE MERGER
In determining to enter into the Merger Agreement, the Special Committee
and the Board of Directors of the Company considered a number of factors
including, the prospect of increased competition on the Mississippi Gulf Coast
and in the Bossier City/Shreveport, Louisiana, area, the need for additional
capital to, among other things, fund future development of the Company's
properties, the Company's lack of earnings over the past four years through
1997, management's projections for earnings in 1998 and the market price of the
Company's Common Stock.
INCREASED COMPETITION
Biloxi. The Imperial Palace Casino began business in Biloxi in December
1997, and in February 1998, opened approximately 520 of 1,088 planned rooms in
its 32-story hotel, with the remaining rooms being opened on a periodic basis
thereafter. While the Company's Biloxi casino was not initially adversely
affected
10
<PAGE> 14
by the opening of the Imperial Palace, the full impact of competition from
Imperial Palace will likely not be experienced until after that property has had
time to fully open and establish its customer base. Grand Casinos added a 500
room hotel and a 42,000 square foot convention center in Biloxi in January 1998,
and Grand Casinos has broken ground on a 500 room hotel in Gulfport,
Mississippi, which is expected to open in the second or third quarter of 1999.
Beau Rivage casino, reported to be a $650,000,000 project being developed in
Biloxi by Mirage Resorts, Inc., is scheduled to open in early 1999, and has been
announced as a high quality destination resort which will feature 1,800 hotel
rooms and approximately 90,000 square feet of gaming space. While the Beau
Rivage casino may substantially grow the Gulf Coast gaming market, which was
approximately $760,000,000 in 1997, Mirage Resorts, Inc., has announced that it
expects to take approximately $120,000,000 in revenues from existing Gulf Coast
casino operators in 1999. The Company cannot predict the extent to which the
Beau Rivage casino will adversely affect its Biloxi casino's revenues, and when,
if ever, that the anticipated growth in the Biloxi gaming market will fully
absorb the revenues generated by the Beau Rivage casino or any other new gaming
entrant.
Bay St. Louis. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. and Europa Cruises Corp.
have announced plans for casino developments on the north side of St. Louis Bay,
directly across from the Company's Bay St. Louis casino. Both of those casinos,
if developed, would have easier access from Interstate Highway 10, the main
artery from New Orleans to the Mississippi Gulf Coast. The western suburbs of
New Orleans are a principal market for the Company's Bay St. Louis casino, and
the new competitors would directly compete with the Company's property in Bay
St. Louis. Both of these projects have announced that each expects investment
levels will be greater than $300,000,000 with project amenities, including
sufficient hotel rooms to support the expected casino volume and to offer a high
quality resort experience. The Company does not anticipate that either
development will be open, if ever, until after mid 2001. While the Company's
management does not believe that the opening of the Beau Rivage casino will have
a material adverse affect on the Company's Bay St. Louis casino, there are no
assurances that will be the case.
Bossier City. Horseshoe Casino opened its 606 room all-suite hotel in
December 1997, and in January 1998 opened a new casino. In addition, the Isle of
Capri casino broke ground on a 300 plus room suite hotel with an anticipated
cost of $35,000,000, which is expected to be completed by the end of the first
quarter of 1999. Additionally, preliminary approval had been granted by the
Louisiana Gaming Control Board to relocate the former Hilton Hotels Corp. New
Orleans gaming license to the Shreveport, Louisiana, riverfront, within one mile
of the Company's Bossier City property. It was announced by a group which
included Paddlewheel, Inc. that the casino operating under that relocated
license would be a $250,000,000 project which would open in early 2000. During
the first quarter of 1998, the Company's management believed that another
license for the Bossier City/Shreveport market would be granted in mid-1998,
which would have meant the addition of another competing casino in that market
as early as mid-2000.
CAPITAL NEEDS
To remain competitive, the Company's management believes that it must make
extensive and continuous improvements to its existing properties, particularly
on the Gulf Coast. These improvements will require the addition of a significant
number of hotel rooms and other major amenities. The Company has completed
construction of its 387 room hotel at Biloxi with available cash, and has
commenced construction of a 188 room hotel in Bossier City which it believes can
be completed with available cash. However, management believes that in order to
remain competitive, the Company will need to develop a destination resort at its
Bay St. Louis property, which would include a 1,500 room luxury hotel, a new
casino, an expanded golf course, tennis courts, stables, a full service marina
and other resort type amenities, and that additional amenities and hotel rooms
will have to be planned for the Biloxi and Bossier City casinos. Other than the
current improvements in Biloxi and those under construction in Bossier City,
management's cash flow projections, prior to February 19, 1998, did not reflect
the generation of sufficient cash flow to fund any substantial part of the
improvements believed to be needed in order to meet future competition.
The Company's ability to raise additional debt capital to fund the needed
future expansion is restricted by its existing debt and debt related agreements.
Furthermore, the Company's ability to raise additional equity capital is
constrained by the low market price of the Company's Common Stock, lack of prior
earnings, and a general lack of market demand and interest in the Company's
Common Stock and in the gaming sector.
11
<PAGE> 15
In 2001 and 2003, the Company will be required to repay or refinance the
$135,000,000 and $115,000,000, respectively, of secured debt which will then be
due. The ability of the Company to obtain such refinancing, and at reasonable
rates, will depend in large part on the Company's operating results and its
ability to meet the new and planned competition. This repayment could come at a
time when competitive pressures have reduced earnings and cash flow to a point
where the Company's ability to support such debt would become questionable, or
when the capital markets are not supportive of the gaming industry.
EARNINGS/MARKET PRICE OF STOCK
With the advent of new well capitalized casinos in its markets, the
Company's management expects operating margins to decline as the Company is
forced to incur higher promotional and marketing expenses to offset the new
competition. The new competitors may add more gaming capacity to the Company's
markets faster than the markets will grow, resulting in the need for the Company
to incur higher operating costs in an attempt to maintain its existing customer
base. In addition, the Company may expect to incur greater salary and training
costs as competition attracts or attempts to attract the Company's employees
with offers of superior compensation or benefits.
As a result of the increased competition discussed above, management
expected declining traffic and increasing margin pressure at the beginning of
1998, and based upon this expectation, projected 1998 earnings for internal uses
of approximately $5.4 million, or $0.15 per share, and EBITDA (earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of approximately $65,300,000
($61,700,000 after deduction of the EBITDA attributable to the minority interest
held by another party in the Company's Argentine casinos). While this would have
been an improvement over the past four years of losses, the amount did not
appear sufficient to provide any significant margin for error in providing for
future cash needs. In addition, the Company's history of achieving its
internally generated income goals and meeting analyst's expectations was not
favorable. Furthermore, the Company's Board of Directors and Special Committee
were uncertain as to whether $0.15 per share of earnings, even if achieved,
would support a market price equal to the $2.27 per share each Shareholder would
receive upon the Merger. On February 18, 1998, the closing price of the Common
Stock was $1.6875 per share.
CONCLUSION
The Company's Board of Directors and Special Committee believe, that
without access to sufficient competitively priced capital and with anticipated
pressure on its operating margins and cash flow, the Company may not be able to
make the necessary improvements to its properties, maintain its current customer
base in the near term and continue its present trend of improved operating
results over prior years. Other risks, such as hurricanes, additional tax
obligations, an adverse change in the country's economy or an unfavorable change
in the public's attitude toward gaming, could also adversely affect the
Company's ability to operate profitably.
Based upon the foregoing, on February 19, 1998, the Board of Directors and
the Special Committee unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby were advisable and in the best interest of the
Company and its Shareholders, and committed to recommend that Shareholders vote
to approve the Merger.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
EARNINGS
Earnings for the first and second quarter, respectively, of 1998, were
higher than those projected at the time the Company's Board of Directors and
Special Committee approved the Merger. The following table compares, both before
and after allowance for Merger transaction costs, the previously budgeted
EBITDA, net income and earnings per share of the Company for the first and
second quarters of 1998, to the actual EBITDA, net income and earnings per share
for the same periods, and the previously budgeted EBITDA and
12
<PAGE> 16
net income of the Company for the month of July 1998, to the currently estimated
EBITDA and net income for that month (all amounts in thousands, except per share
data).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTER ENDED QUARTER ENDED MONTH ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 JUNE 30, 1998 JULY 31, 1998
-------------------- -------------------- -------------------------
PREVIOUSLY PREVIOUSLY PREVIOUSLY CURRENT
BUDGETED ACTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL BUDGETED ESTIMATED(2)
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
EBITDA......................... $12,903 $15,950 $15,869 $17,845 $7,610 $9,210
Before Merger transaction
costs(1)
Net income................... (1,184) 3,111 973 2,445 2,356 3,456
Earnings (loss) per
share-basic............... (0.03) 0.09 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.10
After Merger transaction
costs(1)
Net income................... (1,184) 2,478 973 1,989 2,356 3,456
Earnings (loss) per
share-basic............... (0.03) 0.07 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.10
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Merger transactions costs for the first six months of 1998 were $1,090,000.
(2) See discussion below regarding revenues of the Company's Bossier City casino
and the reversal of accruals for certain expenses.
The budgeted and actual net income and earnings per share set forth in the
table above, and discussed in the following paragraph, do not include a full
provision for income taxes as the Company has a net operating loss carry forward
which will off-set income in 1998 for income tax purposes.
Prior to the beginning of 1998, the Company's management projected, for
internal purposes, that the Company would earn $5,400,000 or $0.15 per share,
and have EBITDA of $65,300,000 in 1998 ($61,700,000 after deduction of the
EBITDA attributable to the minority interest held by another party in the
Company's Argentine casinos). These projections were provided by the Company to
Wasserstein and Furman Selz to assist them in preparing their February 1998
fairness opinions described below. Almost all of the earnings projected for 1998
were anticipated to be earned in the third quarter of 1998, which is
traditionally the Company's best quarter. Based upon the results of operations
through June 1998, and projected results of operations in July 1998, the Company
currently projects that in 1998 it will have net income of approximately
$12,250,000, before deduction of Merger transaction costs, or approximately
$0.34 per share, and will have EBITDA of approximately $71,350,000 ($67,673,000
after deduction of the EBITDA attributable to the minority interest held by
another party in the Company's Argentine casinos). This assumes that the
Company's earnings for the remainder of the year will not be substantially
better or worse than originally projected. If the Shareholders do not approve
the Merger, the Company will be required to pay Hollywood Park $3,500,000, which
would reduce 1998 earnings by approximately $0.10 per share, and will have paid
Merger transaction costs incurred by the Company and estimated to be
approximately $2,250,000, which would further reduce earnings by approximately
$0.06 per share.
The Company's projections could, of course, be adversely or favorably
affected by any number of situations or events, which could result in actual
earnings differing materially from those projected, including weather,
competition, a general decrease or increase in the gaming market, the relative
success of the Company's marketing efforts, particularly with the operation of
the Company's hotel in Biloxi, and the effect of the opening of the Company's
hotel later this year in Bossier City.
The increase in earnings in the first seven months of 1998 over budget was
the result of all of the Company's properties exceeding revenue and income
projections, particularly at its Biloxi and Bossier City casinos. The individual
property explanations are as follows:
Biloxi. The Company's Biloxi casino's revenue and EBITDA exceeded those
previously budgeted for the six months ended June 30, 1998, by approximately
$3,274,000 and $1,775,000, respectively. For the month of July 1998, the
Company's Biloxi casino exceeded budgeted revenues by $639,000, and is expected
to exceed budgeted EBITDA by approximately $360,000. The Mississippi Gulf Coast
market grew for the first four months of 1998 at a rate of 10.9% over the first
four months of 1997. This compares to a total annual growth of 5.3% and 1% for
the entire years of 1996 and 1997, respectively. In anticipation of competition
from the newly opened Imperial Palace Casino, and the expected disruption caused
by the construction of the Company's hotel at Biloxi, the Company's management
projected that the Biloxi casino would not maintain its market share during the
first four months of 1998. Instead, the Biloxi casino maintained a 7.4% market
share of the
13
<PAGE> 17
Gulf Coast casino revenues for the first four months of 1998, while its fair
share of the market went from 12.5% at December 31, 1997 to 10.6% at April 30,
1998, after giving effect to the new gaming capacity introduced by the Imperial
Palace Casino. There is no assurance that the Company's Biloxi casino will
continue to maintain its current market share, particularly in face of the
opening of the Beau Rivage casino in 1999.
Bay St. Louis. The Company's Bay St. Louis casino's revenue and EBITDA
exceeded those previously budgeted for the six months ended June 30, 1998, by
approximately $1,550,000 and $816,000, respectively. For the month of July 1998,
the Company's Bay St. Louis casino met its revenue budget and is expected to
meet its EBITDA budget. The Company's management believes that improved
operating results at Bay St. Louis are the result of higher gaming revenues
generated from entertainment activities at the Company's new 22,500 square foot
entertainment complex, which opened December 31, 1997, and the benefits of a
maturing and much improved golf course.
Bossier City. The Company's Bossier City casino's revenue and EBITDA
exceeded those previously budgeted for the six months ended June 30, 1998, by
approximately $5,291,000 and $2,353,000, respectively. For the month of July
1998, the Company's Bossier City casino exceeded budgeted revenues by $325,000
and is expected to exceed budgeted EBITDA by approximately $800,000. Net income
and EBITDA for July 1998 includes $600,000 resulting from the reversal of an
over-accrual of employee benefit and players club expenses over the seven month
period ended July 31, 1998. The improved results over budgeted amounts were
largely the result of the total Bossier City/Shreveport, Louisiana market growth
during the first six months of 1998 of 13.8% over the first six months of 1997.
This compares to an annual growth rate of 9.5% for all of 1997. Also, the
Company's market share has increased from 16.8% to 18.5% when compared to the
first six months of 1997 to 1998. The Company's management believes that
Horseshoe Casino's addition of 606 hotel rooms, combined with their new casino,
positively impacted the total market growth rate, and increased overnight
business from the Dallas area as well as from other regional markets. This in
turn has benefitted the Company's Bossier City facility.
Argentina. The Company's Argentine casinos' revenues and EBITDA exceeded
those previously budgeted for the six months ended June 30, 1998, by
approximately $750,000 and $349,000, respectively. For the month of July 1998,
the Company's Argentine casinos exceeded budgeted revenues by $352,000, and are
expected to exceed budgeted EBITDA by approximately $100,000. The increased
revenues in Argentina are the result of a continuing increase in the acceptance
of slot machines. Argentina's win per slot unit per day for the first five
months ended May 31, 1998 was $68.20 per unit as compared to $58.11 per unit per
day for the comparable period in 1997. As a result of the Company's equity and
management fee interests in its Argentine casinos, the Company has an
approximately 55% interest in the cash flow of those casinos.
POSSIBLE CHANGES IN COMPETITIVE AND POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT
The Louisiana Gaming Control Board announced in May 1998, that the last of
fifteen authorized gaming licenses to be issued in Louisiana will not be issued
for one year and then only if a state commissioned study indicates the need for
the license within a specific market area, thus postponing, for a time, a
potential for increased competition through an additional license in the Bossier
City/Shreveport, Louisiana market. The Company believes, however, that risks
relating to competition resulting from the opening in the Bossier
City/Shreveport market of a fifth casino by a joint venture consisting of
Hollywood Casino Corp., Sodak Gaming, Inc. and Paddlewheel, Inc., by late 2000,
still exist. Furthermore, the failure to issue a fifteenth gaming license may
demonstrate an anti-gaming stance on the part of the current Louisiana
governmental administration.
CONCLUSION
While the Company's experience recently with respect to the addition of a
competitive casino and casino amenities in its markets has been favorable, there
is no assurance that this trend will continue as the addition of competing
facilities may dilute rather than grow the markets in which the Company
operates. In addition, although the Company believes it has better access to
capital than it did in early 1998, there can be no assurance this access will
continue and, as explained above, continued capital improvements are important
for continued competitiveness.
14
<PAGE> 18
OPINIONS OF THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL ADVISORS
Opinion of Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc.
Wasserstein has acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection
with the Merger. At the meeting of the Company's Board of Directors held on
February 19, 1998, Wasserstein delivered its opinion to the Company's Board that
as of February 19, 1998, the consideration to be paid to Shareholders in
connection with the Merger was fair to such Shareholders from a financial point
of view (the "Wasserstein Fairness Opinion"). At the meeting of the Company's
Board of Directors held on August 4, 1998, at the request of the Company's Board
of Directors, Wasserstein confirmed the Wasserstein Fairness Opinion as of such
date (the "Opinion Confirmation Letter").
THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY OF THE WASSERSTEIN FAIRNESS OPINION AND THE OPINION
CONFIRMATION LETTER IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPLETE
WASSERSTEIN FAIRNESS OPINION ATTACHED TO THIS PROXY STATEMENT AS ANNEX C AND THE
OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER ATTACHED TO THIS PROXY STATEMENT AS ANNEX D.
SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO, AND SHOULD, READ THE WASSERSTEIN FAIRNESS OPINION AND
THE OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER CAREFULLY IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND CONSIDER THE
ASSUMPTIONS MADE AND LIMITS OF THE REVIEW BY WASSERSTEIN. THE WASSERSTEIN
FAIRNESS OPINION AND THE OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER ARE ADDRESSED TO THE
COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ADDRESS ONLY THE FAIRNESS FROM A FINANCIAL
POINT OF VIEW OF THE CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS PURSUANT
TO THE MERGER. THE CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS PURSUANT TO
THE MERGER WAS DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND
HOLLYWOOD PARK. THE WASSERSTEIN FAIRNESS OPINION AND THE OPINION CONFIRMATION
LETTER DO NOT ADDRESS THE UNDERLYING DECISION BY THE COMPANY TO ENGAGE IN THE
MERGER AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY SHAREHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH
SHAREHOLDER SHOULD VOTE AT THE MEETING. THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY DOES NOT PURPORT
TO BE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE ANALYSIS PERFORMED BY WASSERSTEIN.
In arriving at its opinion, Wasserstein reviewed, among other things, (i)
the Merger Agreement; (ii) certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to the Company, including publicly available consolidated
financial statements of the Company and publicly available financial statements
for certain subsidiaries of the Company, in each case for recent years and
interim periods; (iii) certain internal historical consolidating financial
information; (iv) financial forecasts and projections provided to Wasserstein by
the Company; (v) certain publicly available information concerning the public
trading prices of the Common Stock, certain market indices and the stock of
certain other businesses similar to that of the Company; (vi) certain recent
acquisitions and business combination transactions in the casino gaming
industry; and (vii) reviewed the terms of the proposed transaction submitted to
the Company by Hollywood Park (in the case of the Wasserstein Fairness Opinion,
set forth in a term sheet dated February 13, 1998 and amended on February 19,
1998, and, in the case of the Opinion Confirmation Letter, as set forth in the
Merger Agreement); Wasserstein also met with management of the Company to review
and discuss such information and the Company's business, operations, assets,
financial condition and future prospects. Wasserstein also performed such other
studies, analyses and investigations as it considered appropriate.
In its review and analysis and in formulating its opinion, Wasserstein
assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all the financial and
other information provided to it, and Wasserstein has not assumed any
responsibility for independently verifying any of such information. Wasserstein
assumed, with the consensus of the Board of Directors of the Company, that the
financial forecasts and projections provided to Wasserstein by the Company were
prepared in good faith and on bases reflecting the best judgments and estimates
of the respective managements of each such entity then available. The
Wasserstein Opinion and the Opinion Confirmation Letter are necessarily based on
economic and market conditions and other circumstances as they existed and could
be evaluated by Wasserstein as of the respective dates of each of the
Wasserstein Fairness Opinion and the Opinion Confirmation Letter.
The forecasts, projections and estimates furnished to Wasserstein by the
Company were based upon numerous variables and assumptions which are inherently
uncertain and which may not be within the control of the Company, including,
without limitation, general economic, regulatory and competitive conditions.
Accordingly, actual results could vary materially from those set forth in such
forecasts, projections and estimates.
15
<PAGE> 19
The following is a summary of the analyses presented by Wasserstein to the
Company's Board of Directors on February 19, 1998 and August 4, 1998. The
summary below includes reference ranges of implied prices per share of Common
Stock based on Wasserstein's judgment of the data analyzed. These reference
ranges include reference points, implicit in the Merger Consideration under the
Merger Agreement of $2.27 in cash to be paid per share of Common Stock in the
Merger, including the enterprise value as a multiple of EBITDA (defined as
operating income plus depreciation and amortization and preopening expenses less
the portion of opening income plus depreciation and amortization of subsidiaries
implicitly allocable to minority investors of such subsidiaries) estimated for
1997 of 8.2x and an estimated 1998 EBITDA multiple of 5.6x. These reference
points were all considered in the context of the analyses described below. Each
of these analyses supports the Wasserstein Fairness Opinion because the Merger
Consideration of $2.27 per share of Common Stock and the estimated 1997 EBITDA
and estimated 1998 EBITDA multiples implied by the Merger Consideration of $2.27
per share of Common Stock are within the reference ranges for such prices and
multiples calculated using a public company trading analysis, a precedent merger
and acquisition transactions analysis and a discounted cash flow analysis. In
addition, the premium implied by the Merger Consideration of $2.27 per share of
Common Stock to the market trading price of the Common Stock (prior to the first
public information concerning a possible merger) exceeds the relevant range of
control premiums paid in comparable casino gaming company transactions.
In connection with its preparation of the Opinion Confirmation Letter,
Wasserstein updated the analyses described in the preceding paragraph and
presented its findings to the Company's Board of Directors on August 4, 1998. In
preparing Wasserstein's update of the Wasserstein Fairness opinion, Wasserstein
updated the reference ranges and reference points, implicit in the Merger
Consideration, including an updated enterprise value as a multiple of EBITDA of
6.1x for the latest twelve month period ended June 30, 1998 and 5.2x for the
estimated 1998 EBITDA, to take into account information available as of the date
of the Opinion Confirmation Letter. Such updated reference points were all
considered in the context of the updated analyses described below. Taken as a
whole, these analyses support the Opinion Confirmation Letter.
Public Company Trading Analysis. In connection with the preparation of the
Wasserstein Fairness Opinion, Wasserstein reviewed, analyzed and compared the
certain operating, financial and trading information of the Company with that of
ten other publicly traded casino gaming companies consisting of Ameristar
Casinos, Inc., Argosy Gaming Company, Aztar Corp., Casino America, Inc.,
Harvey's Casino Resort, Hollywood Casino Corp., Players International, Inc., Rio
Hotel & Casino, Showboat, Inc. and Trump Hotel and Casino Resorts (the
"Comparable Casino Gaming Companies") including market equity and enterprise
values. These values and multiples are set forth below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARKET ENTERPRISE VALUE/
EQUITY ENTERPRISE P/E MULTIPLES EBITDA
VALUE VALUE -------------------- -------------------
($MM) ($MM) LTM 1997E 1998E LTM 1997 1998
------ ---------- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Ameristar Casinos, Inc........... $125 $ 274 9.0x 13.3x 11.1x 5.5x 6.1x 4.5x
Arogosy Gaming Corp.............. 98 477 NM NM 36.4 11.3 9.2 6.3
Aztar Corp....................... 405 960 39.6 56.3 56.3 6.9 7.5 7.5
Casino America, Inc.............. 63 472 NM 12.8 11.2 6.5 5.6 5.4
Casino Magic..................... 41 273 NM NM NM 7.4 5.7 5.0
Harveys Casino Resorts........... 288 435 15.9 18.5 19.8 6.6 6.8 7.4
Hollywood Casino Group........... 54 241 NM 13.5 10.8 8.7 4.3 4.3
Player's International, Inc...... 140 293 21.8 21.9 12.9 7.1 5.6 4.9
Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc.......... 586 877 25.4 22.0 18.5 10.9 9.4 8.4
Showboat, Inc.................... 488 738 55.5 55.9 39.5 8.8 8.4 7.2
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts.... 276 2,024 NM NM NM 8.8 7.2 7.1
</TABLE>
- ---------------
NM means not meaningful
LTM means last twelve months
16
<PAGE> 20
Based upon the foregoing values and multiples and in Wasserstein's
judgment, the appropriate reference ranges for the Company derived from its
public company trading analysis and the implied public trading reference range
prices for each share of Common Stock resulting therefrom are depicted on the
table below. The reference ranges of implied public company trading prices are
not based on a purely mathematical analysis, but also take into consideration a
qualitative analysis of each publicly traded company and Wasserstein's judgments
concerning the likely trading position of the Company in the market of publicly
traded casino gaming companies.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CASINO MAGIC ENTERPRISE EQUITY VALUE
RESULT MULTIPLE VALUE RANGE RANGE
($ IN MILLIONS) RANGE ($ IN MILLIONS) (PER SHARE)
--------------- -------------- --------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1997 EBITDA..................... $41.9 5.0x - 6.0x $209.7 - $251.7 ($1.47) - ($0.30)
1998 EBITDA (estimated)......... $61.7 4.5x - 5.5x $277.7 - $339.4 $0.43 - $2.16
1998 Earnings Per Share
(estimated) $0.11(1) 10.0x - 12.0x $301.8 - $309.7 $1.10 - $1.32
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Excludes an extraordinary net operating loss tax effected at 40%.
In connection with its preparation of the Opinion Confirmation Letter,
Wasserstein updated the analyses described above taking into account, among
other things, the information that appears under the caption "Subsequent
Events -- Earnings" above, and in Wasserstein's judgment, the appropriate equity
value range for each share of Common Stock resulting therefrom was updated to a
low of $0.48 and a high of $2.93.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. In connection with the preparation of the
Wasserstein Fairness Opinion, Wasserstein performed discounted cash flow
analyses based on management's projections and calculated present values per
share of Common Stock as of December 31, 1997. In performing its discounted cash
flow analysis, Wasserstein considered various different assumptions that it
deemed appropriate. Based on a review with management of the Company's prospects
and risks associated with the business of the Company, Wasserstein applied
valuation parameters that it deemed appropriate to management's projections.
Wasserstein believed it appropriate to analyze the Company's projected cash
flows under three different scenarios: (i) management's base case, (ii) a no
"Bay Saint Louis expansion case" in which additional cash flows forecasted by
management resulting from the construction and operation of a new hotel are
excluded due to the uncertainty regarding to financing of the project and (iii)
a "Biloxi downside case" in which forecasted results at the Company's Biloxi
property are reduced as a result of expected increased competition in the
market. Wasserstein utilized management's estimates of EBITDA for 1998 through
2001, discount rates of 11%-12% and valuation multiples of 4.5x-5.5x. These were
deemed appropriate given the trading multiples of the Comparable Casino Gaming
Companies. Based on the foregoing, in Wasserstein's judgment, a discounted cash
flow analysis yielded a reference range of implied prices of $0.10-$3.90 per
share of Common Stock, the results of which are summarized in the following
table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IMPLIED ENTERPRISE VALUE TO
ENTERPRISE EBITDA
VALUE RANGE EQUITY VALUE RANGE ---------------------------
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS ($ IN MILLIONS) (PER SHARE) 1997 1998
- ----------------------------- --------------- ------------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Base Case........................... $335.7 - $401.6 $2.05 - $3.90 8.0x - 9.6x 5.4x - 6.5x
No Bay St. Louis Expansion Case..... 319.0 - 375.3 1.58 - 3.16 7.6x - 8.9x 5.2x - 6.1x
Biloxi Downside Case................ 266.0 - 312.3 0.10 - 1.40 6.3x - 7.4x 4.3x - 5.1x
</TABLE>
In connection with preparing the Opinion Confirmation Letter, Wasserstein
applied the three scenarios described above based upon the Company's updated
projected cashflows (see "Subsequent Events -- Earnings"). Wasserstein utilized
discount rates of 11% to 12% in each case, terminal valuation multiples of
4.5x - 5.5x in management's base case and terminal valuation multiples of
4.0x - 5.0x in the no "Bay St. Louis Expansion Case" and the "Biloxi downside
case" to reflect the impact of not completing the construction of a new hotel at
the Company's Bay St. Louis property as contemplated in management's base case.
In addition, Wasserstein believed it appropriate to analyze an additional fourth
case, the "Bay St. Louis Phase II Expansion Case, which contemplates the
construction of an entertainment pavilion, a new one-level casino and other
amenities in 2001 at the Company's Bay St. Louis casino, the estimated costs of
which were
17
<PAGE> 21
provided by management, to preserve the Company's competitive position in light
of projects proposed by competitors for the Bay St. Louis market. This case
utilized the same discount rates and terminal valuation multiples as
management's base case. Based on the foregoing, and in Wasserstein's judgement,
a discounted cash flow analysis yielded a reference range of implied prices of
$1.67 to $6.39 per share of Common Stock, the results of which are summarized in
the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IMPLIED ENTERPRISE VALUE TO
ENTERPRISE EBITDA
VALUE RANGE EQUITY VALUE RANGE -----------------------------
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS ($ IN MILLIONS) (PER SHARE) LTM EBITDA(1) 1998 EBITDA
- ----------------------------- --------------- ------------------ ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Base Case....................... $418.2 - $496.1 $4.21 - $6.39 7.3x - 8.7x 6.2x - 7.33x
Bay St. Louis Phase II Expansion
Case.......................... 395.5 - 472.7 3.58 - 5.74 6.9x - 8.3x 5.8x - 7.0x
No Bay St. Louis Expansion
Case.......................... 366.7 - 430.9 2.77 - 4.57 6.4x - 7.6x 5.4x - 6.4x
Biloxi Downside Case............ 327.4 - 384.3 1.67 - 3.26 5.7x - 6.7x 4.8x - 5.7x
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Latest twelve month period ended June 30, 1998.
Precedent Merger and Acquisition Transactions. In connection with the
preparation of the Wasserstein Fairness Opinion, Wasserstein reviewed and
analyzed selected merger and acquisition transactions involving other companies
in the casino gaming industry that it deemed relevant. Among other factors,
Wasserstein indicated that while there have been a number of recent casino
gaming transactions, acquisition values paid in specific transactions have
historically been affected by several factors including the transaction
structure, the target's operating performance and geographic mix of assets, the
existence of a controlling/major shareholder and the strategic rationale for the
transaction.
Wasserstein reviewed and analyzed selected transactions involving other
companies in the casino gaming industry since December 1994 that it deemed
relevant and are listed in the table below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNOUNCEMENT
DATE ACQUIROR TARGET
- ------------ -------- ------
<S> <C> <C>
12/16/94 ITT Corp. Caesars World Inc.
03/20/95 Circus Circus Enterprises Inc. Gold Strike Resorts
07/06/95 Grand Casinos Gaming Corp. of America
01/08/96 Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Taj Mahal Holding Corp.
03/20/96 Hollywood Park Boomtown, Inc.
04/26/96 Boyd Gaming Corp. Par-A-Dice Gaming Corp.
Bally Entertainment
06/06/96 Hilton Hotels Corp. Corp,
10/21/97 Boyd Gaming Corp. Treasure Chest
12/19/97 Harrah's Entertainment Showboat, Inc.
</TABLE>
Wasserstein's analysis of the selected acquisition transactions yielded an
estimated multiple at the date of the transaction announcement of EBITDA
estimated for the next fiscal twelve months (based upon a consensus of research
analysts' estimates) of 4.lx-8.2x. Because the market conditions and
circumstances surrounding each of the transactions analyzed were specific to
each transaction, and because of the inherent differences between the
businesses, operations and market conditions of the Company and the acquired
businesses analyzed, Wasserstein believed it was inappropriate to, and therefore
did not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the analysis and,
accordingly, also made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the
characteristics of these transactions and the Merger that would affect the
acquisition values of the Company and such acquired companies.
Based on the foregoing values and multiples and in Wasserstein's judgment,
the appropriate reference range derived from its precedent merger and
acquisition transactions analysis was 5.0x-6.0x as a multiple of estimated 1998
EBITDA, implying a reference price range of $1.29 - $3.02 per share of Common
Stock.
In connection with its preparation of the Opinion Confirmation Letter,
Wasserstein updated the analyses described above to include an additional
announced transaction, Hilton Hotels Corp.'s proposed acquisition of
18
<PAGE> 22
Grand Casinos, Inc., announced on June 30, 1998 (the "Hilton/Grand
Transaction"), and updated the reference price range to reflect the Company's
updated projections. As a result of the foregoing, in Wasserstein's judgment,
the Merger Consideration remains within appropriate reference price range
derived from its precedent merger and acquisition transactions analysis.
Premiums Paid Analysis. In connection with the preparation of the
Wasserstein Fairness Opinion, Wasserstein reviewed mergers and acquisitions
involving casino gaming companies to derive a range of control premiums paid
over public trading prices per share one week and four weeks prior to the
announcement of such transactions. However, Wasserstein noted that the reasons
for, and circumstances surrounding each of the transactions analyzed were
diverse and the characteristics of the companies involved were not necessarily
comparable to those of the Merger. In addition, recent mergers and acquisitions
across all industries in which the target companies were acquired for cash
consideration were reviewed to derive a range of control premiums paid over
public per share trading prices one week and four weeks prior to the
announcements of such transactions.
The analyses indicated that the medians of control premiums paid in casino
gaming transactions over public per share trading prices one week and four weeks
prior to the announcement of such transactions were 64.6% and 62.9%,
respectively. The Merger Consideration represents a premium over the trading
price of Common Stock one week and four weeks prior to the first public
information (Internet) concerning a possible merger of 96.3% and 86.3%,
respectively.
In connection with its preparation of the Opinion Confirmation Letter,
Wasserstein updated the analyses described above to include the Hilton/Grand
Transaction and found that the medians described above were still below the
Company's premiums described above.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not
necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Selecting
portions of the analysis or of the summary set forth above, without considering
the analysis as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying Wasserstein's opinion. In arriving at its opinion, Wasserstein
considered the results of all such analyses. The analyses were prepared solely
for purposes of providing its opinion to the Board of Directors of the Company
that the consideration to be received by the Shareholders pursuant to the Merger
was fair to such holders from a financial point of view. Analyses based upon
forecasts of future results are not necessarily indicative of actual future
results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by
such analyses.
Wasserstein is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is
continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in
connection with mergers and acquisitions and other purposes.
Pursuant to a letter agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Wasserstein,
upon and subject to the consummation of a merger, a fee equal to one percent of
the aggregate consideration paid by an acquiring party in connection with a
merger, less $550,000. The aggregate consideration is the sum of all amounts
paid to the Shareholders, plus the amount of the long term liabilities of the
Company (including current portions) assumed by the acquiring party. Based upon
the $2.27 per share Merger Consideration and the current indebtedness of the
Company, Wasserstein's fee, contingent upon consummation of the Merger, will be
approximately $3,050,000. In consideration for the Wasserstein Fairness Opinion
and the Opinion Confirmation Letter the Company has agreed to pay Wasserstein a
fee equal to $350,000. In addition, the Company has agreed to reimburse
Wasserstein for its reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in connection with its activities under the letter agreement, regardless of
whether the Merger is consummated. The Company has also agreed to indemnify
Wasserstein and certain related persons against certain liabilities arising out
of or in conjunction with its engagement, including certain liabilities under
federal securities laws.
In the ordinary course of its business, Wasserstein may actively trade the
equity and debt securities of the Company for its own account and for the
accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities.
19
<PAGE> 23
Opinion of ING Baring Furman Selz LLC
The Company retained Furman Selz to render financial advisory services to
the Special Committee with respect to the proposed Merger.
At the meeting of the Special Committee on February 19, 1998, Furman Selz
rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing on the same date
(the "Furman Selz Opinion"), to the effect that, as of February 19, 1998 and
based upon the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of review, as set
forth in such opinion, the Hollywood Park offer of $2.27 per share of Common
Stock (the "Cash Offer") was fair to the Shareholders from a financial point of
view.
At the request of the Special Committee, on August 4, 1998, Furman Selz
confirmed in writing (the "Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter") that, as of
August 4, 1998, and based upon the assumptions made, matters considered and
limits of review, as set forth in the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter,
it remained the opinion of Furman Selz that the Cash Offer was fair to the
Shareholders from a financial point of view.
COPIES OF THE FURMAN SELZ OPINION AND THE FURMAN SELZ OPINION CONFIRMATION
LETTER, WHICH SET FORTH THE ASSUMPTIONS MADE, MATTERS CONSIDERED AND CERTAIN
LIMITATIONS ON THE SCOPE OF REVIEW UNDERTAKEN BY FURMAN SELZ, ARE ATTACHED
HERETO AS ANNEX "E AND F", RESPECTIVELY, AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE. THE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE FURMAN SELZ OPINION AND THE FURMAN SELZ
OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER SET FORTH HEREIN ARE QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT OF THE FURMAN SELZ OPINION AND THE FURMAN SELZ
OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER. SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE FURMAN SELZ
OPINION AND THE FURMAN SELZ OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER IN THEIR ENTIRETY. THE
FURMAN SELZ OPINION AND THE FURMAN SELZ OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER ARE
ADDRESSED TO THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE AND ADDRESS ONLY THE FAIRNESS FROM A
FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW OF THE CASH OFFER. THE CASH OFFER WAS DETERMINED ON THE
BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND HOLLYWOOD PARK. THE FURMAN SELZ
OPINION AND THE FURMAN SELZ OPINION CONFIRMATION LETTER DO NOT ADDRESS THE
UNDERLYING DECISION BY THE COMPANY TO ENGAGE IN THE MERGER AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE
A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY SHAREHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH SHAREHOLDER SHOULD VOTE AT
THE MEETING.
In arriving at its opinion set forth in the Furman Selz Opinion, as
confirmed by the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter, Furman Selz among
other things: (i) reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other information concerning the Company; (ii) reviewed certain information
relating to prior periods concerning the business, earnings and assets of the
Company furnished to Furman Selz by the management of the Company; (iii)
conducted due diligence discussions with members of senior management of the
Company and Hollywood Park about their views regarding future business,
financial and operating benefits arising from the Merger; (iv) reviewed the
historical market prices and trading activity for the Company's Common Stock and
compared them with those of certain publicly traded companies which Furman Selz
deemed to be relevant to the Company; (v) compared the results of operations of
the Company with those of certain companies which Furman Selz deemed to be
relevant to the Company; (vi) compared the proposed financial terms of the
Merger with the financial terms of certain other mergers and acquisitions which
Furman Selz deemed to be relevant; (vii) reviewed the terms of the proposed
transaction submitted to the Company by Hollywood Park (in the case of the
Furman Selz Opinion, set forth in a term sheet dated February 13, 1998 and
amended on February 19, 1998, and, in the case of the Furman Selz Opinion
Confirmation Letter, as set forth in the Merger Agreement); and (viii) reviewed
such other financial studies and analyses and performed such other
investigations and took into account such other matters as Furman Selz deemed
necessary, including its assessment of general economic, market and monetary
conditions.
In preparing the Furman Selz Opinion and the Furman Selz Opinion
Confirmation Letter, Furman Selz relied on the accuracy and completeness of all
information supplied or otherwise made available to it by the Company, and did
not assume responsibility for independent verification of such information.
Furman Selz did not assume responsibility for undertaking an independent
valuation or appraisal of the assets of the Company and no such valuation or
appraisal was provided to it. With respect to the information furnished by the
Company, and with respect to the information discussed with management of the
Company, regarding their views of future operations, Furman Selz assumed that
such information had been reasonably prepared and reflected the best then
available estimates and judgments of the Company's management as to the
20
<PAGE> 24
competitive, operating and regulatory environments and related financial
performance of the Company, as the case may be, for the relevant periods and as
to the strategic rationale for the Merger. In addition, the Company assumed that
the Merger would qualify for purchase accounting treatment in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. The Furman Selz Opinion and the Furman
Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter were necessarily based upon market, economic,
financial and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated as of the
respective dates of the Furman Selz Opinion and the Furman Selz Opinion
Confirmation Letter. In the Furman Selz Opinion and the Furman Selz Opinion
Confirmation Letter, Furman Selz observed that it was not expressing any opinion
as to the price at which the Common Stock would actually trade at any time.
The matters considered by Furman Selz in arriving at its opinion are based
on numerous macroeconomic, operating and financial assumptions with respect to
industry performance, general business and economic conditions, many of which
are beyond the control of the Company, and involve the application of complex
methodologies and educated judgment. Any estimates incorporated in the analyses
performed by Furman Selz are not necessarily indicative of actual past or future
results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than such
estimates. Estimated values do not purport to be appraisals and do not
necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or companies may be sold in
the future. The Furman Selz Opinion does not present a discussion of the
relative merits of the Merger as compared with any other business plan or
opportunity that might be presented to the Company, or the effect of any other
arrangement in which the Company might engage.
At meetings of the Special Committee held on February 19, 1998, and on
August 4, 1998, Furman Selz presented certain financial analyses accompanied by
written materials in connection with the delivery of its oral opinion on
February 19, 1998 and its Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter on August 4,
1998. The following is a summary of the material financial and comparative
analyses performed by Furman Selz in arriving at the Furman Selz Opinion, which
was delivered on February 19, 1998, and the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation
Letter which was delivered on August 4, 1998.
Analysis of Selected Comparable Publicly Traded Companies. Using publicly
available information and certain estimates of future financial results
published by First Call, Furman Selz compared certain financial and operating
information and ratios of the Company with corresponding financial and operating
information for a group of publicly traded companies engaged primarily in
businesses which Furman Selz deemed to be relevant for the purpose of its
analysis, including Argosy Gaming Co., Boyd Gaming Corp., Casino America, Inc.,
Hollywood Park, Lady Luck Gaming Corp., Players International, Inc. and
President Casinos, Inc., and for the Furman Selz Opinion, but, because of its
acquisition by Hilton Hotels Corporation, not for the Furman Selz Opinion
Confirmation Letter, Grand Casinos, Inc. (the "Furman Comparable Companies").
Regarding the Furman Selz Opinion dated February 19, 1998, Furman Selz's
calculations resulted in the following relevant ranges for the Comparable
Companies: total enterprise value (defined as market value of common equity plus
book value of total debt, preferred stock and minority interests, less cash) as
a multiple of latest twelve months ("LTM") earnings before interest, taxes and
depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") (as of December 31, 1997) of 5.9x to
7.5x (with the Company at 7.1x) and enterprise value as a multiple of projected
calendar 1998 EBITDA of 5.2x to 5.7x (with the Company at 4.9x). Applying the
ranges of multiples derived from the Comparable Companies' information analyzed
by Furman Selz, Furman Selz took the average of the enterprise values
calculated, and calculated the implied per share equity values of the Company
ranging from $1.30 to $2.76.
Regarding the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter dated August 4, 1998,
Furman Selz's calculations resulted in the following relevant ranges for the
Furman Comparable Companies: total enterprise value as a multiple of LTM EBITDA
(as of June 30, 1998) of 5.5x to 6.5x (with the Company at 5.6x) and enterprise
value as a multiple of projected calendar 1998 EBITDA of 4.0x to 5.0x (with the
Company at 4.7x). Applying the ranges of multiples derived from the Furman
Comparable Companies' information analyzed by Furman Selz, Furman Selz took the
average of the enterprise values calculated and calculated implied per share
equity values of the Company ranging from $1.49 to $3.32.
21
<PAGE> 25
None of the companies utilized in the above analysis for comparative
purposes is, of course, identical to the Company. Accordingly, a complete
analysis of the results of the foregoing calculations cannot be limited to a
quantitative review of such results and involves complex considerations and
judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of
the Furman Comparable Companies and other factors that could affect the public
trading value of the Furman Comparable Companies.
Comparable Acquisition Analysis. Furman Selz also reviewed the financial
terms of certain transactions in the gaming industry (the "Comparable
Acquisitions"). The Comparable Acquisitions reviewed were: (i) the acquisition
by Colony Capital, Inc. of Harvey's Casino Resorts; (ii) the acquisition by
Crescent Real Estate Equities of Station Casinos; (iii) the acquisition by
Harrah's Entertainment of Showboat, Inc.; (iv) the acquisition by Sun
International Hotels Ltd. of Griffin Gaming and Entertainment, Inc.; (v) the
acquisition by Hilton Hotels Corp. of Bally Entertainment; (vi) the acquisition
by Boyd Gaming Corp. of Par-A-Dice Gaming Corporation; (vii) the acquisition by
Hollywood Park, Inc. of Boomtown, Inc.; (viii) the acquisition by Trump Hotels
and Casino Resorts, Inc. of Trump's Castle Casino Resort; (ix) the acquisition
by Grand Casinos, Inc. of Gaming Corporation of America; (x) the acquisition by
ITT Corp. of Caesar's World, Inc., and (xi) with respect to the Furman Selz
Opinion Confirmation Letter, but not the Furman Selz Opinion, the acquisition of
Grand Casinos, Inc. by Hilton Hotels Corporation.
Furman Selz then analyzed offer value and enterprise value consideration
multiples implied by the purchase price in these transactions. For the Furman
Selz Opinion dated February 19, 1998, the analyses resulted in the following
relevant range: value as a multiple of LTM EBITDA (as of December 31, 1997) of
6.7x to 8.6x. Applying the range of multiples derived from Comparable
Acquisitions analyzed by Furman Selz, for the Furman Selz Opinion dated February
19, 1998, Furman Selz calculated implied share equity values of the Company
ranging from $1.25 to $3.64. For the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter
dated August 4, 1998, the analyses resulted in the following relevant range:
value as a multiple of LTM EBITDA (as of June 30, 1998) of 5.5x to 6.5x.
Applying the range of multiples derived from Comparable Acquisitions information
analyzed by Furman Selz for the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter dated
August 4, 1998, Furman Selz calculated implied share equity values of the
Company ranging from $2.09 to $3.76.
No transaction utilized in the comparable acquisition analysis was
identical to the Merger. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the
foregoing is not purely mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations
and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics
of the companies included in the comparable acquisition analysis and other
factors that could affect the offer value and the transaction consideration.
Premium Analysis. Furman Selz reviewed the premiums paid in acquisition
transactions (the "Furman Comparable Transactions") in the gaming sector since
December 1, 1994, with transaction values in excess of $20 million. Such
analysis indicated that, in such transactions, the mean and median premiums to
the closing market price one day, one week and one month prior to announcement
of the transaction, were 34.2%, 33.0% and 42.6%, 40.4%, 47.1% and 51.1%,
respectively.
Furman Selz's analyses of the premiums paid in the Furman Comparable
Transactions indicated that the mean or median imputed offer price for a share
of Common Stock, as of February 19, 1998 (the date on which it was announced
that Hollywood Park offered to purchase the Company and the Company accepted
such offer) and on January 20, 1998 (the date on which it was announced that
Grand Casinos, Inc. offered to purchase the Company, which offer was
subsequently rejected) would range from $1.79 to $2.60.
No transaction utilized in the comparable transaction analysis was
identical to the Merger. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the
foregoing is not purely mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations
and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics
of the companies included in the comparable transaction analysis and other
factors that could affect the offer value and the transaction consideration.
22
<PAGE> 26
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Furman Selz also performed discounted cash
flow analyses (i.e., an analysis of the present value for the projected
unlevered free cash flows and terminal value for the periods and at the discount
rates indicated) of the Company using discount rates reflecting a weighted
average cost of capital ranging from 11.0% to 15.0%. For the Furman Selz Opinion
dated February 19, 1998, the discounted cash flow analyses were for the years
1998 through 2001, inclusive, using terminal value multiples of calendar year
2001 EBITDA ranging from 4.5x to 5.5x. For the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation
Letter dated August 4, 1998, the analyses were for the six month period ending
December 31, 1998 and the years 1999 through 2002, inclusive, using terminal
value multiples of calendar year 2002 EBITDA ranging from 4.0x to 5.0x.
Applying the results of such discounted cash flow analysis, Furman Selz
calculated the implied per share equity values of the Company ranging, for the
Furman Selz Opinion dated February 19, 1998, from $1.20 to $3.92 and for the
Furman Selz Confirmation Letter dated August 4, 1998, from $2.21 to $5.39.
The summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete description
of the analyses performed by Furman Selz in arriving at its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and not necessarily
susceptible to partial or summary description. In arriving at the Furman Selz
Opinion, as confirmed by the Furman Selz Opinion Confirmation Letter, Furman
Selz did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor
considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance
and relevance of each analyses and factor. Furman Selz believes that its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses and of the factors considered by it, without considering all factors
and analyses, could create a misleading view of the processes underlying its
analyses set forth in its opinion.
The Company's Special Committee selected Furman Selz to render a fairness
opinion because Furman Selz is an internationally recognized investment banking
firm with substantial experience in transactions similar to the Merger. Furman
Selz is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities
in connection with mergers and acquisitions and for other purposes and has
substantial experience in transactions similar to the Merger.
Pursuant to a letter agreement, the Company paid Furman Selz a $325,000
opinion fee and agreed to pay a fee of $250,000 for the Furman Selz Opinion
Confirmation Letter. The fees paid or payable to Furman Selz are not contingent
upon the contents of the opinion delivered. In addition, the Company agreed to
reimburse Furman Selz for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (including
reasonable fees and expenses of its legal counsel) not to exceed $30,000
incurred in connection with its engagement, and to indemnify Furman Selz and
certain related persons against certain liabilities arising out of or in
conjunction with its rendering of services under its engagement, including
certain liabilities under federal securities laws.
In the ordinary course of its business, Furman Selz may actively trade the
securities and loans of the Company for its own account and for the accounts of
its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities and loans.
THE FULL TEXTS OF THE OPINIONS AND RELATED CONFIRMATION LETTERS, WHICH SET
FORTH THE ASSUMPTIONS MADE, MATTERS CONSIDERED AND LIMITATIONS OF THE REVIEWS
UNDERTAKEN, ARE INCLUDED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT AS ANNEXES C, D, E AND F AND
ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ EACH
OPINION AND RELATED CONFIRMATION LETTER CAREFULLY IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE OPINIONS
ARE AS OF FEBRUARY 19, 1998, AND THE CONFIRMATION LETTERS ARE AS OF AUGUST 4,
1998, AND ARE DIRECTED ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE MERGER
CONSIDERATION FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW AS OF THOSE DATES. NEITHER THE
OPINIONS NOR THE CONFIRMATION LETTERS ADDRESS ANY OTHER ASPECT OF THE MERGER OR
THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.
23
<PAGE> 27
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
The Merger will be treated as a "purchase" for accounting purposes.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
In connection with the Merger Agreement, Mr. Torguson entered into the
Shareholder Agreement which, among other things, provides that Mr. Torguson will
continue to be employed by the Company following the Merger. See "THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT -- The Shareholder Agreement." On January 27,
1998, the Company adopted a Change in Control Severance Plan (the "Plan") which
provides for severance payments to the Company's executive officers and to the
managers of the Company's casinos following a "change in control" of the
Company. The Merger would constitute such a change in control. See "EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION -- Employment and Change of Control Arrangements."
TREATMENT OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS
The Merger Agreement provides that all options to acquire Common Stock
issued under the Option Plan and certain Non-Plan Options outstanding at the
Effective Time (the "Original Options") will be cancelled and the holders of
such Original Options will receive in exchange thereof options to acquire
Hollywood Park common stock ("Substitute Options") at an exercise price equal to
the product of (i) the exercise price of their Original Options divided by $2.27
and (ii) the average closing sales price of Hollywood Park common stock for the
ten trading days immediately preceding the date of the Merger Agreement
($15.075). The number of shares into which such Substitute Options will be
exercisable is the number of shares subject to the Original Options multiplied
by 0.15058. The vesting terms of each of the Substitute Options will be
equivalent to the vesting of the respective Original Option exchanged therefor.
In all other respects, the terms of the Substitute Options will be governed by
the provisions of Hollywood Park's option plan, unless such provisions
materially adversely affect the rights of the holders of the Original Options,
in which case the provision of the Substitute Options will be governed by the
terms of the Option Plan or the Non-Plan Options, as appropriate.
PROCEDURE FOR EFFECTING THE MERGER
The Merger will become effective upon (the "Effective Time") the filing
with the Minnesota Secretary of State of Articles of Merger containing the Plan
of Merger. Such filing will not occur until certain conditions, including
approval by the Shareholders, are satisfied or waived. If the conditions to the
completion of the Merger are not satisfied or waived, the Merger will not be
effected notwithstanding the approval by the Shareholders of the Merger. In
addition, the Company and Hollywood Park each have certain rights to not
complete the Merger even if the conditions are satisfied. Among the rights of
the Company to not complete the Merger are its rights to accept a competing
acquisition proposal which is superior to that contemplated by the Merger
Agreement. If such a proposal is received, the Merger Agreement requires that
Hollywood Park be permitted to acquire the Company by increasing the Merger
Consideration to an amount which equals or is superior to the terms of the
competing proposal. The Plan of Merger provides that it may be amended to
reflect such an adjustment in the Merger Consideration without requiring
additional approval by the shareholders of the Company and HP Acquisition.
EXCHANGE PROCEDURES
Prior to the Effective Time, Hollywood Park will designate a bank or trust
company reasonably acceptable to the Company to serve as the Paying Agent for
the shares of Common Stock, and will deposit with the Paying Agent, for the
benefit of the Shareholders at the Effective Time who have not properly asserted
dissenter's rights, immediately available funds in an amount that equals the
aggregate Merger Consideration payable to such Shareholders.
Promptly after the Effective Time, the Paying Agent will mail to each
record holder of Common Stock as of the Effective Time a form of letter of
transmittal and instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the
24
<PAGE> 28
certificates for the Common Stock (the "Certificates") for payment of the Merger
Consideration. Delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss shall pass, only
upon proper delivery of the Certificates to the Paying Agent.
Upon the surrender to the Paying Agent of duly executed letters of
transmittal and Certificates, the holders of the Certificates shall be entitled
to receive the Merger Consideration and the Certificates shall be cancelled. If
payment (or any portion thereof) is to be made to a person other than the person
in whose name the surrendered Certificate is registered, the surrendered
Certificate must be properly endorsed in accordance with the instructions to be
provided by the Paying Agent.
CERTAIN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
Upon consummation of the Merger, each outstanding share of Common Stock,
except for shares for which Shareholders have asserted dissenter's rights (See
"RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS"), will be cancelled in exchange for payment
of $2.27 per share. Certain employees holding options to purchase Common Stock
will receive replacement options to purchase Hollywood Park common stock
following the Merger.
The following discussion is a summary of the principal federal income tax
consequences of the Merger to Shareholders. The discussion does not purport to
consider all aspects of federal income taxation which may be relevant to a
Shareholder, and the tax treatment of a Shareholder may vary according to the
Shareholder's situation. Certain Shareholders (including insurance companies,
tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, broker-dealers, foreign
corporations, persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States,
and employees holding shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options or
otherwise as compensation) may be subject to special rules not discussed below.
In addition, the discussion does not consider the effect of any foreign, state
or local tax laws. The discussion assumes that Shareholders hold their Common
Stock as "capital assets" (generally property held for investment) within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The
following discussion also includes a summary of the principal federal income tax
consequences of the Merger to employees of the Company who hold incentive stock
options to purchase Common Stock.
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES SET FORTH BELOW ARE INCLUDED FOR
GENERAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE BASED UPON PRESENT LAW. EACH
SHAREHOLDER IS URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF APPLICABLE STATE, LOCAL OR
OTHER TAX LAWS.
The receipt of cash in exchange for Common Stock pursuant to the Merger
(including payments to dissenting Shareholders) will be a taxable transaction
for federal income tax purposes and may also be a taxable transaction under
applicable state, local and foreign tax laws. A Shareholder will generally
recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the
difference between such Shareholder's adjusted tax basis in such Shareholder's
Common Stock and the cash received by such Shareholder. Such gain or loss will
be a capital gain or loss if such Common Stock is held as a capital asset, and
will be a long-term gain or loss if, at the Effective Time of the Merger, the
shares were held for more than one year. Long-term capital gain recognized by
Shareholders that are individuals will be treated at the lowest rates applicable
to capital gains if the Shareholder has held the shares for more than 18 months.
The receipt of the Merger Consideration may be subject, under certain
circumstances, to "backup withholding" at a 31% rate. This withholding generally
applies only if the Shareholder (i) fails to furnish his or her social security
or other taxpayer identification number ("TIN") within a reasonable time after
the request therefor, (ii) furnishes an incorrect TIN, (iii) is notified by the
Internal Revenue Service that the Shareholder has failed to report properly
interest or dividends, or (iv) fails, under certain circumstances, to provide a
certified statement, signed under penalty of perjury, that the TIN provided is
the correct number and that he or she is not subject to backup withholding.
Amounts paid as backup withholding (but not any applicable penalties) are
creditable against a Shareholder's federal income tax liability.
25
<PAGE> 29
Under the Merger Agreement, upon the Merger each employee of the Company
who is a holder of an incentive stock option granted under the Company's 1992
Incentive Stock Option Plan to purchase Common Stock, will, in substitution of
that option, receive an incentive stock option to purchase common stock of
Hollywood (the "Substitute Option") which qualifies as in incentive stock option
as defined under Section 422(b) of the Code. This substitution of options is
described under "APPROVAL OF THE MERGER -- Treatment of Outstanding Options."
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the fair market value of the Substitute
Option to purchase Hollywood's common stock which is to be held by an employee
immediately after the Merger will not exceed (but will equal) the fair market
value of the option that employee held to purchase Common Stock immediately
prior to the Merger. Further, the Substitute Option will not provide the option
holder with any benefits in addition to those provided under a previously held
option to purchase Common Stock. Based upon the foregoing, the receipt by an
employee of the Company of a Substitute Option which qualifies as an incentive
stock option, notwithstanding the fact that the exercise price of the Substitute
Option is less than the market price of Hollywood Park, Inc.'s common stock when
such Substitute Option is granted, will not be deemed to be income to that
employee for federal income tax purposes.
THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of material terms of the Merger Agreement, a
copy of which is included in this Proxy Statement as Annex B. The material terms
of the Merger Agreement are summarized below, but such summary is not a complete
description of the terms and conditions thereof and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the Merger Agreement. Shareholders are urged to review the
Merger Agreement carefully.
GENERAL
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, HP Acquisition
will merge with and into the Company and the separate corporate existence of HP
Acquisition will thereupon cease, with the Company remaining as the surviving
corporation and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Hollywood Park.
As a result of the Merger, at the Effective Time, each share of Common
Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than
shares as to which dissenters' rights are properly asserted) will be converted
into and represent the right to receive the Merger Consideration, which consists
of $2.27 in cash. In the Merger, each share of capital stock of HP Acquisition
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted
into and become one fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock, $.01 par
value, of the Company. Hollywood Park may require the Effective Time to be
delayed until October 31, 1998. Hollywood Park may further delay the Effective
Time until the earlier of March 31, 1999 or the date the Merger receives
applicable regulatory approval. See "Regulatory Approval" below. Upon
consummation of the Merger, the registration of the Common Stock under the
Exchange Act will be terminated, and the Common Stock will cease to be reported
and listed on The Nasdaq National Market System.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The Merger Agreement contains various customary representations and
warranties made by the Company relating to its capital structure, operations,
financial condition, properties and other matters including its authority to
enter into the Merger Agreement and to consummate the Merger. Hollywood Park has
also made customary representations and warranties. None of the representations
made by the Company or Hollywood Park in the Merger Agreement will survive the
Merger.
CERTAIN COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY
The Company has agreed that from the date of the Merger Agreement until the
Effective Time, the Company and its subsidiaries will each conduct their
respective operations in accordance with their ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and will use their reasonable best efforts to
preserve intact their business organization, keep their officers and employees
and maintain existing business relationships.
26
<PAGE> 30
Specifically, and in summary, the Company has agreed that, without the prior
written consent of Hollywood Park, the Company will not amend its articles of
incorporation or by-laws; fail to make scheduled payments on its debt
obligations; issue or commit to issue any capital stock or rights to acquire any
capital stock; borrow, guarantee or assume any debt for borrowed money in excess
of $5,000,000 or prepay any indebtedness; enter into any employment, deferred
compensation or similar agreement (or amend any such existing agreement) with
any existing or prospective director, officer, employee or consultant of or to
the Company; increase benefits payable under any existing severance or
termination or employment agreements; increase compensation, bonus or other
benefits payable to directors, officers or employees of the Company; make any
loans or investments in any other person or otherwise pledge the credit of the
Company, or mortgage or pledge any of its assets; fail to comply in any material
respect with any laws or other governmental restrictions applicable to the
Company; declare or pay any dividends; redeem or otherwise acquire any
outstanding Common Stock; merge or consolidate with, purchase substantially all
or any substantial part of the assets of, or otherwise acquire any business or
organization except in connection with the exercise of fiduciary obligations in
accordance with applicable law upon the consummation of a Superior Proposal (as
defined under "No Solicitation of Competing Acquisition Proposals," below);
except for up to approximately $25,000,000 in capital improvements at the
Bossier City casino, make significant capital expenditures; adopt, amend or
terminate or propose to adopt, amend or terminate employee benefit plans or
arrangements; dispose or commit to dispose of any material portion of its assets
or business or relinquish any contract or other right material to the Company;
or change any method of accounting or accounting practices.
The Company and Hollywood Park have agreed to use their best efforts
promptly to take, or cause to be taken, all actions necessary, proper or
advisable to consummate the Merger.
NO SOLICITATION OF COMPETING ACQUISITION PROPOSALS
The Merger Agreement prohibits the Company from directly or indirectly
encouraging another party to offer to merge with or otherwise acquire the
Company or a substantial portion of the Company's assets (an "Acquisition
Proposal"). The Merger Agreement further restricts the Company from carrying on
negotiations with or disclosing any non-public information relating to the
Company or providing access to the properties, books or records of the Company
to any person that may be considering making, or has made, an Acquisition
Proposal; or agreeing to approve, recommend or enter into any agreement
regarding an Acquisition Proposal.
Notwithstanding these restrictions, if the Company has received an
unsolicited, written, bona fide Acquisition Proposal from a third party, the
Company's Board of Directors concludes in good faith, after consultation with
its legal and financial advisors, that such Acquisition Proposal is superior
from a financial point of view to the Merger (a "Superior Proposal"), and the
Company's Board of Directors has determined, after consultation with outside
legal counsel, that the failure to take such action in respect of such
Acquisition Proposal would result in a substantial risk of liability for a
breach of fiduciary duties of the members of the Company's Board of Directors
under applicable law; then in such event, the Company may pursue acceptance of
such a Superior Proposal. The Company has agreed to promptly notify Hollywood
Park upon its receipt of any Acquisition Proposal, any indication that any
person is considering making an Acquisition Proposal, or any request for
non-public information relating to the Company by any person that may be
considering making, or has made, an Acquisition Proposal, and will keep
Hollywood Park fully informed of the status and details of any such Acquisition
Proposal or request, including furnishing Hollywood Park a copy of any
Acquisition Proposal or request received.
The Company may terminate the Merger Agreement if it receives a Superior
Proposal and Hollywood Park fails to provide a counter proposal which the Board
of Directors of the Company, after consultation with its financial advisors and
legal counsel, finds to be at least equivalent to the Superior Proposal. The
Company is required to provide Hollywood Park at least five business days to
submit a counter proposal. If the Company terminates the Merger Agreement to
pursue a Superior Proposal, the Company must pay $3,500,000 to Hollywood Park.
27
<PAGE> 31
CERTAIN COVENANTS OF HOLLYWOOD PARK
The Merger Agreement prohibits Hollywood Park, prior to the fifth
anniversary of the Effective Time, from amending or repealing the provisions for
indemnification of directors, officers, employees or agents contained in the
articles of incorporation or bylaws of the Company as of the date of the Merger
Agreement. In addition, until the second anniversary of the Effective Time,
Hollywood Park has agreed to cause the Company to maintain in effect, to the
extent available, the policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance
maintained by the Company as of the date of the Merger Agreement (or policies of
at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms that are no less
advantageous to the insured parties) with respect to claims arising from facts
or events that occurred on or prior to the Effective Time.
Hollywood Park has agreed, for a period of no less than twelve months
following the Effective Time, to provide each employee of the Company with
benefits that are at least substantially equivalent in the aggregate to those
provided under the employee benefit plans and arrangements of the Company.
Hollywood Park has also agreed to require the Company to continue to employ
certain specified managerial employees of the Company during the six month
period following the Effective Time or, if they are terminated after the
Effective Date, to continue to pay the salary of those terminated employees
during such six month period unless the termination was for cause.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Completion of the Merger is subject to receipt of all regulatory approvals
of the Merger from the Mississippi Gaming Commission and the Louisiana Gaming
Control Board, and notice to the gaming authorities for Argentina Authorities
and the Nevada Gaming Commission. Applications for all such approvals have been
filed, and on June 18, 1998, the Mississippi Gaming Commission approved the
Merger subject to Shareholder approval. There can be no assurance that the other
regulatory authorities will approve or not take action to prevent completion of
the Merger, and there can be no assurance as to the timing of such regulatory
approval or other action. The Merger Agreement provides that if regulatory
approval for the Merger from Mississippi or Louisiana is not obtained and that
is the only outstanding condition to completion of the Merger as of October 31,
1998, neither the Company nor Hollywood Park may unilaterally terminate the
Merger Agreement prior to March 31, 1999.
The parties and certain of their directors and executive officers may also
need to be found suitable by governmental authorities which administer gaming
laws applicable to the Company and Hollywood Park. These authorities may also
require stockholders owning certain percentages of Hollywood Park and other
persons having a material relationship or involvement with Hollywood Park, to be
found suitable as part of the approval process relating to the Merger.
In 1997, Hollywood Park, its officers, directors, key personnel and persons
then holding a 5% or greater interest in Hollywood Park were found suitable by
the Mississippi Gaming Commission and the Louisiana Gaming Control Board in
connection with Hollywood Park's acquisition of Boomtown, Inc. and its Louisiana
subsidiary. Although Hollywood Park has advised the Company that it believes
that it and its current officers, directors, key personnel and 5% stockholders
will be found suitable to operate the Company's facilities, there can be no
assurance that all necessary findings of suitability will be made.
OTHER CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
In addition to approval by the shareholders of the Company and HP
Acquisition, and the Mississippi Gaming Commission and the Louisiana Gaming
Control Board, completion of the Merger is subject to there being no applicable
law or court order which prevents or prohibits the consummation of the Merger,
or which would materially impair the effective operation of the business of the
Company or Hollywood Park after the Effective Time, and the absence of
proceedings challenging the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated
thereby or seeking to prohibit, alter, prevent or materially delay the Merger.
The obligations of Hollywood Park and HP Acquisition to complete the Merger
are also subject to the satisfaction of the following additional conditions: (a)
the performance by the Company in all material
28
<PAGE> 32
respects of its obligations under the Merger Agreement and the accuracy of its
representations and warranties as of the Effective Time; (b) receipt by
Hollywood Park of any documents requested from the Company to evidence the
existence of the Company and its subsidiaries and the authority of the Company
to enter into the Merger Agreement; (c) receipt by Hollywood Park of the
opinions of legal counsel to the Company, in a form reasonably acceptable to
Hollywood Park; (d) the absence of any material adverse change in the results of
operations, financial condition, assets, liabilities, or business of the
Company, from the date of the Merger Agreement through the Effective Date, which
material adverse effect has not been adequately reserved for in the Company's
financial statements; and (e) the holders of no more than 10% of the issued and
outstanding shares of Common Stock shall have made the demands and given the
notices required to assert dissenter's rights.
The obligation of the Company to complete the Merger is also subject to the
satisfaction of the following additional conditions: (a) the performance by
Hollywood Park and HP Acquisition in all material respects of their respective
obligations under the Merger Agreement and the accuracy of their representations
and warranties as of the Effective Time, (b) receipt by the Company of any
documents requested from Hollywood Park to evidence the existence of Hollywood
Park and its subsidiaries and the authority of Hollywood Park to enter into the
Merger Agreement; and (c) receipt by the Company of the opinion of legal counsel
to Hollywood Park, in a form reasonably acceptable to the Company.
TERMINATION
Even if the Merger is approved by the Shareholders, the Merger Agreement
may be terminated and the Merger abandoned prior to the Effective Time, (a) by
mutual written consent of the parties; (b) by either Hollywood Park or the
Company under certain circumstances, including, among other things, (i) if the
Merger shall not have been consummated on or prior to October 31, 1998 (subject
to the extension of the deadline as noted above with respect to certain
regulatory approvals), and the failure to consummate the Merger is not caused by
a breach of the Merger Agreement by the terminating party; or (ii) if the other
party breaches in any material respect any of their respective representations
or agreements contained in the Merger Agreement following a cure period (if
applicable); (c) by the Company, if the Company receives a Superior Proposal (as
defined above and Hollywood Park does not provide the Company with a proposal
believed by the Board of Directors to be the equivalent of or superior to the
Superior Proposal; or (d) by Hollywood Park, if the Board shall have withdrawn
or modified in a manner adverse to Buyer its approval or recommendation of the
Merger Agreement or the Merger or shall have approved or recommended an
Acquisition Proposal.
The Company is required to pay $3,500,000 to Hollywood Park if the Merger
Agreement is terminated (a) by either the Company or Hollywood Park due to the
failure to obtain Shareholder approval of the Merger on or before October 31,
1998; (b) by the Company due to its receiving a Superior Proposal; or (c) by
Hollywood Park if the Company breaches in any material representations or
agreements contained in the Merger Agreement, or if the Company's Board of
Directors accepts another Acquisition Proposal or the Board of Directors
withdraws its recommendation to the Shareholders to approve the Merger.
THE SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT
Marlin F. Torguson, who beneficially owns in the aggregate 7,683,000 shares
of Common Stock, or approximately 21.5% of the total number of issued and
outstanding shares of Common Stock entered into an agreement dated February 20,
1998 with Hollywood Park (the "Shareholder Agreement"), pursuant to which he
agreed to vote his shares of Common Stock (and any other shares of capital stock
of the Company which he may acquire) in favor of approving the Merger and any
matter that could reasonably be expected to facilitate the Merger. Mr. Torguson
has granted an irrevocable proxy to Hollywood Park to vote his shares of Common
Stock for such approval.
Pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement, and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth therein, Mr. Torguson has agreed: (i) to continue to be
employed by the Company for a three-year period (the "Employment Period"), and
(ii) not to compete with Hollywood Park or the Company in any of the
jurisdictions in which Hollywood Park, the Company or their respective
subsidiaries operate during the
29
<PAGE> 33
Employment Period. Following the Effective Time, Hollywood Park is to appoint
Mr. Torguson to the board of directors of Hollywood Park. Hollywood Park has
agreed to issue to Mr. Torguson 20,000 shares of Hollywood Park common stock per
year during the Employment Period and pay him $300,000 per year of the
Employment Period. In addition, Hollywood Park will grant Mr. Torguson options
to acquire 30,000 shares of Hollywood Park common stock at an exercise price
equal to the closing price of Hollywood Park common stock on the Effective Date.
The foregoing payments will be made to Mr. Torguson whether or not Hollywood
Park or the Company terminates Mr. Torguson's employment (except for a
termination for cause, as defined in the Shareholder Agreement).
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
GENERAL
The following discussion is a summary of the law pertaining to the rights
of the Shareholders under the Minnesota Business Corporation Act (the "MBCA") to
dissent from the Merger and receive payment of the "fair value" for their
shares. The term "fair value" is determined through a process described in
Section 302A.473, and could be different for each Shareholder exercising his or
her dissenting rights. Copies of Section 302A.471 and 302A.473 of the MBCA
concerning such rights and the procedures for asserting those rights are
attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex G. Any Shareholder who wishes to
exercise such rights or who wishes to preserve his or her right to do so should
review the following discussion and Annex G carefully, because failure to timely
or properly comply with the procedures will result in the loss of the rights to
dissent from the Merger.
PROCEDURES
Under Minnesota law, a Shareholder who follows the procedures set forth in
Section 302A.473 of the MBCA will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to
the "fair value" of his or her shares instead of the Merger Consideration of
$2.27 per share. Such "fair value" is to be the value of the shares immediately
before the Effective Date of the Merger. Such amount may be more or less than
the $2.27 per share cash payment the Shareholder would receive in the Merger.
The Company must notify each Shareholder of the right to dissent from the
Merger, and to provide each Shareholder a brief description of the procedures to
be followed under Sections 302A.471 and 302A.473 and a copy of such sections.
This section of the Proxy Statement constitutes that notice and description, and
the copies of Sections 302A.471 and 302A.473 of the MBCA are attached as Annex
G.
A Shareholder who wishes to exercise dissenter's rights (i) must file with
the Company, before the Meeting, a written notice of intent to assert
dissenter's rights and receive the fair value for all of the Common Stock owned
by such Shareholder; and (ii) must not vote his or her shares in favor of
approving the Merger. That written notice should be sent to the attention of
Robert Callaway, Secretary, Casino Magic Corp., 711 Casino Magic Drive, Bay
Saint Louis, MS 39520.
If the Merger is approved by the Shareholders, the Company will provide a
form and instructions for its completion to each Shareholder who has filed with
the Company the written notice of intent to demand the fair value of their
shares and who did not vote for the Merger as described above. The instructions
will include directions as to where the stock certificates and the completed
form are to be sent in order to receive payment. Failure to return the form and
stock certificates to the Company within 30 days will terminate the
Shareholder's dissenter's rights.
A Shareholder cannot assert dissenter's rights as to less than all of their
shares. A beneficial owner who is not the record owner of their shares may
assert dissenter's rights with respect to shares held on their behalf, and will
be treated as a dissenting Shareholder, if the beneficial owner submits to the
Company a written consent to the assertion of the dissenter's rights by the
beneficial owner signed by the record owner holding such beneficial owner's
shares. That consent must be sent with or before the beneficial owner provides
the Company with the notice of the intention to assert dissenter's rights.
30
<PAGE> 34
If a Shareholder properly complies with the procedures described above, the
Company will, within five days after the Effective Date, send to the dissenting
Shareholder the amount the Company estimates to be the fair value of the
Shareholder's Common Stock, certain financial statements of the Company, an
explanation of how the Company determined the amount of the payment and
information as to further procedures to be followed by the dissenting
Shareholder if the dissenting Shareholder wishes to seek an additional payment
for the shares, because the Shareholder believes the fair value is greater than
the Company's estimate.
To be able to obtain any additional payment, the dissenting Shareholder
must give written notice to the Company of the Shareholder's own estimate of the
fair value within 30 days after the Company mails the payment and demand payment
of the difference. If that estimate and demand is not given to the Company, the
dissenting Shareholder will receive only the amount the Company paid. If that
estimate and demand is given to the Company, the Company will have 60 days to
either, (i) pay to the dissenting Shareholder the amount demanded or agreed to
between the Company and the Shareholder, plus interest on that amount, or (ii)
file with the District Court for Hennepin County, Minnesota a petition
requesting that the court determine the fair value of the shares. All dissenting
Shareholders who have demanded an additional payment and who have not reached
agreement with the Company will be named in such a petition. The court will
determine whether such dissenting Shareholders have fully complied with the
dissent procedures, and whether they are entitled to any additional payment. In
determining the fair value of the shares, the court will take into account any
and all factors and valuation methods the court finds appropriate, whether or
not used by the Company or by a dissenting Shareholder. The fair value of the
shares as determined by the court is binding on all dissenting Shareholders
named in the petition.
COSTS AND EXPENSES
The costs and expenses of the court proceeding, including the expenses and
compensation paid to any appraiser which may be appointed by the court, will be
paid by the Company. The court may, however, assess part or all of those costs
and expenses against a dissenting Shareholder if the court believes the
Shareholder has not acted in good faith in demanding the additional payment. The
court may also require a dissenting Shareholder who the court believes has not
acted in good faith, to reimburse the Company for fees and expenses of experts
or attorneys employed by the Company. The court also has the discretion to apply
portions of the additional payment due dissenting Shareholders to payment of any
attorneys who have represented the dissenting Shareholders in the court
proceeding.
PROPOSAL II
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
All members of the Company's Board of Directors are being nominated for
election at the Meeting. Unless otherwise directed, it is the intention of those
appointees named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote for the election of
Marlin F. Torguson, James E. Ernst, Roger H. Frommelt and E. Thomas Welch as the
members of the Company's Board of Directors. Each nominee is being nominated for
a term of approximately one year, or until the next annual meeting of the
Company's shareholders.
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors recommends a vote in favor of each of the proposed
nominees listed below, and the proxies will be voted in favor of such proposed
nominees or as otherwise directed.
31
<PAGE> 35
INFORMATION CONCERNING NOMINEES
The names, ages and respective positions of the directors of the Company as
of the date of this Proxy Statement, each of whom is a nominee, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME DIRECTOR SINCE AGE POSITION
---- -------------- --- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Marlin F. Torguson(1)................ 1992 53 Chairman of the Board and a Director
1995 47 President, Chief Executive Officer and a
James E. Ernst....................... Director
Roger H. Frommelt(1)(2).............. 1992 61 Assistant Secretary and a Director
E. Thomas Welch(1)(2)................ 1993 59 Director
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Member of the Nominating Committee
(2) Member of the Audit, Compensation, Stock Option and Special Committees
The business experience, principal occupations and directorships in
publicly-held companies for the nominated directors of the Company are set forth
below.
MARLIN F. TORGUSON has been the Company's Chairman of the Board since
December 1, 1994. Mr. Torguson was President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company from April 1992 through November 1994. From April 1992 to February 1993,
Mr. Torguson also served as the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
Mr. Torguson was a 50 percent owner and a Vice President of G.M.T. Management
Co. from December 1983 to December 1994. G.M.T. Management Co. was responsible
for the operation and management of Jackpot Junction Casino, located in Morton,
Minnesota, from December 1983 until January 1, 1992.
JAMES E. ERNST became the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer
in December 1995. From June 1992 until September 1995, Mr. Ernst served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Casino America, Inc., a casino
developer and operator which has gaming operations in Mississippi and Louisiana.
From June 1991 to June 1992, Mr. Ernst was President of Steamboat Development
Co., an operator of riverboat casinos in Iowa. From 1976 to 1991, Mr. Ernst was
with the public accounting firm of McGladrey & Pullen in its Davenport, Iowa
office.
ROGER H. FROMMELT is the President and a principal shareholder of Frommelt
& Eide, Ltd., a law firm located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He has been engaged
in the private practice of law in Minneapolis, Minnesota since 1965, practicing
with Frommelt & Eide, Ltd. and its predecessor partnership since 1974. Mr.
Frommelt served as the Company's Secretary from May 1993 until December 1994,
when he was appointed the Company's Assistant Secretary.
E. THOMAS WELCH has been the President and a member of the Board of
Directors of Resource Trust Company, located in Minneapolis, Minnesota since
March 1987. Mr. Welch is also a member of the Board of Directors of Eastcliff
Funds, Inc., a mutual fund company located in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
During the year ended December 31, 1997 the Board of Directors held 13
meetings. None of the members of the Board of Directors proposed for re-election
attended less than 75% of any of the meetings of the Board of Directors and its
committees held in the year ended December 31, 1997.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has the responsibility of: (i)
reviewing audited financial statements and consulting with the Company's
independent auditors on various audit and financial personnel issues, including
review of internal financial controls; (ii) resolving conflicts of interest that
may arise in transactions between the Company and its officers and directors who
are not serving as members of the Audit Committee; and (iii) interfacing with
internal audit personnel concerning financial compliance with procedures and
policies established by the Company, or prescribed by jurisdictions in which the
Company conducts
32
<PAGE> 36
gaming operations. The Audit Committee held two meetings during the year ended
December 31, 1997, and members of the Audit Committee were in informal contact
concerning Audit Committee matters numerous times during 1997.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, which consists solely
of non-employee directors, has authority to consider, negotiate, establish and
modify the salaries, bonuses and other forms of compensation of the duly elected
executive officers of the Company and any of its subsidiaries. The Compensation
Committee held five meetings during the year ended December 31, 1997, and
members of the Compensation Committee were in informal contact concerning
compensation matters numerous times during 1997.
Stock Option Committee. The Stock Option Committee has authority to
administer the Company's 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan, and to grant and
establish the terms of stock options thereunder. The Stock Option Committee held
two meetings during the year ended December 31, 1997.
Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee has the authority to
consider the qualifications of and recommend each candidate and incumbent for
election as a director of the company and to nominate candidates to fill Board
of Director member vacancies. The Nominating Committee will consider shareholder
nominations of candidates for election as directors of the Company upon receipt
of a written request provided to the Company's Nominating Committee no later
than December 31 of the calendar year preceding the next annual meeting of
shareholders together with the written consent of such person to serve as a
director. The Nominating Committee held one meeting during the year ended
December 31, 1997.
Special Committee. The Special Committee has the duty and authority to
review and assess all proposals made to the Company which could involve a change
in the control of the Company by reason of stock ownership or a material change
in the membership of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Special Committee
has the power and authority to negotiate, execute and deliver, on behalf of the
Company, any agreement which involves or relates to a change in control of the
Company. The Special Committee held one meeting during the year ended December
31, 1997.
The members of the committees of the Board of Directors are identified
under "Information Concerning Nominees" above.
INFORMATION CONCERNING NON-DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The names, ages, positions and business experience of the Company's
non-director executive officers, as of the date of this Proxy Statement are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Jay S. Osman......................... 37 Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Callaway................... 50 Vice President/General Counsel and Secretary
Kenneth N. Schultz................... 48 Vice President/Construction
</TABLE>
JAY S. OSMAN became the Company's Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer in October 1995. From August 1995 through October 1995,
Mr. Osman served as Corporate Director of Financial Planning, Budgets and
Analysis at Boyd Gaming Corporation, a casino developer and operator based in
Las Vegas, Nevada. Mr. Osman served as Vice President of Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of Belle
Casinos, Inc., a casino developer and operator based in Biloxi, Mississippi from
June 1993 through August 1995. From December 1989 through May 1993, Mr. Osman
acted as Manager of Financial Analysis for Bally's Park Place, an Atlantic City,
New Jersey-based casino operator and developer which was a subsidiary of Bally
Entertainment, Inc.
ROBERT A. CALLAWAY has been the Company's Vice President/General Counsel
since September 1994 and its Secretary since December 1994. From 1987 until
August 1994, Mr. Callaway was a partner in the law firm of Beckley, Singleton,
DeLanoy, Jemison & List, located in Reno and Las Vegas, Nevada, where his
practice
33
<PAGE> 37
focused on legal and regulatory issues relating to the gaming industry. For the
five years immediately prior to joining such firm, Mr. Callaway served with the
office of the Attorney General of the state of Nevada as counsel for the Nevada
State Gaming Control Board and the Nevada Gaming Commission.
KENNETH N. SCHULTZ joined the Company as Vice President/Construction in
June 1997 and has served the Company in this capacity since that date. Mr.
Schultz served as Vice President of Construction and Development for Casino
America, Inc. from July 1995 to June 1997. Prior to joining Casino America,
Inc., Mr. Schultz was involved in the development and construction of the Isle
of Capri Casino-Bossier City, Louisiana, the Isle of Capri Casino-Lake Charles,
Louisiana, and the Isle of Capri Casino Crowne Plaza Resort-Biloxi, Mississippi
through DeBartolo Property Management, Inc., where he was employed as Vice
President of Construction Services from 1989 until July 1995.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")
requires executive officers and directors of the Company, and persons who
beneficially own more than 10 percent of the Company's outstanding shares of
Common Stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership of securities of the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") and The Nasdaq Stock Market. Officers, directors and persons
owning more than 10 percent of the Company's outstanding Common Stock are
required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section
16(a) forms filed. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports and
amendments thereto furnished to or obtained by the Company or written
representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that
during the year ended December 31, 1997, all filing requirements applicable to
its directors, officers or beneficial owners of more than 10 percent of the
Company's outstanding shares of Common Stock were complied with.
34
<PAGE> 38
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth certain compensation information for the
Company's Chief Executive Officer who served in such capacity during the year
ended December 31, 1997, and the Company's four most highly compensated
executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, who served as
executive officers at December 31, 1997; and two additional persons who are
current employees of the Company, and who acted as an executive officer for the
Company through May 31, 1997. The foregoing persons are collectively referred to
as the "Named Executive Officers". Compensation information is shown for fiscal
years 1995, 1996 and 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
AWARDS
ANNUAL COMPENSATION -------------------------
------------------------------- RESTRICTED SECURITIES
OTHER ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING
SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION AWARDS OPTIONS/SARS ALL OTHER COMPENSATION
NAME/PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR ($) ($) ($) ($) (#) ($)
----------------------- ---- ------- ------ ------------ ---------- ------------ -----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
James E. Ernst............. 1997 374,796 -- (3) -- 65,000 258,063(7)(8)
President and Chief 1996 425,000 -- 58,813(4) -- -- 311,064(7)(8)
Executive Officer 1995 16,923 -- (3) -- 590,000 9,839(7)
Marlin F. Torguson......... 1997 295,218 -- (3) -- 115,000 3,787(8)(9)
Chairman of the Board 1996 425,000 -- 191,522(5) -- -- 6,695(8)(9)
1995 425,000 -- (3) -- -- 2,832(8)(9)
Jay S. Osman............... 1997 208,776 -- (3) --(6) 15,000 6,337(8)(9)
Executive Vice 1996 208,654 -- (3) -- -- 4,330(8)(11)
President/Treasurer/ 1995 38,512 20,000 (3) 132,500 75,000 --
Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Callaway......... 1997 208,776 -- (3) -- 15,000 9,295(8)(9)(11)
Vice President/General 1996 208,654 -- (3) 135,938(6) 35,000 7,245(8)(9)(11)
Counsel and Secretary 1995 181,154 -- (3) -- 40,000 481(9)
Kenneth N. Schultz......... 1997(1) 192,596 -- (3) --(6) 90,000 14,782(8)(9)(10)(12)
Vice President/ 1996 95,385 82,500 (3) 95,312 -- 11,190(13)
Construction
Juris Basens(2)............ 1997(1) 183,846 55,000 (3) --(6) 82,500 38,040(8)(9)(10)(14)
Vice President/Chief 1996 78,675 20,000 (3) 95,312 -- 2,713(8)(10)
Operating Officer
David L. Paltzik(2)........ 1997(1) 183,846 15,000 (3) --(6) 78,000 10,624(8)(9)(10)(15)
Vice President/ 1996 78,675 20,000 (3) 95,312 -- 3,100(8)(10)
Marketing
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) No compensation information is provided for any prior year as the Named
Executive Officer was employed by the Company only during the years for
which compensation information is provided.
(2) Resigned as an executive officer of the Company and became engaged in the
management of the Company's casino in Bossier City, Louisiana effective
June 1, 1997.
(3) Did not receive perquisites or other personal benefits from the Company in
excess of $50,000 or 10 percent of the Named Executive Officer's total
annual salary and bonus paid for the years indicated.
(4) Amount allocated as income relating to personal use of corporate airplane
in 1996.
(5) $188,672 of this amount was allocated as income relating to personal use of
corporate airplane in 1996.
(6) Messrs. Osman, Callaway, Schultz, Basens and Paltzik were each awarded a
total of 25,000 restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock that vest
over a four year period. As of December 31, 1997, 8,750 shares having a
value of $10,117 (based on the closing trade price on that date) had vested
in favor of each of Messrs. Osman and Callaway, and 3,750 shares having a
value of $4,336 (based on the closing trade price on that date) had vested
in favor of each of Messrs. Schultz, Basens and Paltzik.
(7) Includes forgiveness of indebtedness owed by Mr. Ernst to the Company in
the amounts of $233,926 and $257,866 and $8,208 in 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, and $8,300, $37,328 and $1,631 in 1997, 1996
35
<PAGE> 39
and 1995, respectively, in compensation resulting from an interest-free
loan made by the Company to Mr. Ernst which assumes a 10% annual market
rate of interest. Also includes $6,000 per year car expense allowance and
$9,000 per year housing allowance for 1997 and 1996. See "Employment,
Termination and Change in Control Arrangements."
(8) Includes group life insurance premium payment.
(9) Includes 401(k) plan contribution by the Company.
(10) Includes a $500 per month car allowance.
(11) Includes a $333 per month car allowance.
(12) Includes a $5,537 reimbursement for moving expenses incurred in 1996.
(13) Includes a $250 per month car allowance, a $7,827 reimbursement for moving
expenses and a group life insurance premium.
(14) Includes a $30,718 reimbursement for moving expenses.
(15) Includes $2,069 reimbursement for moving expenses.
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table provides certain information regarding the number of
options to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock granted to the Named
Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
VALUE AT
NUMBER PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ASSUMED ANNUAL
OF SECURITIES OPTIONS/SARS RATES OF STOCK
UNDERLYING GRANTED EXERCISE PRICE APPRECIATION
OPTIONS/SARS TO EMPLOYEES IN OR BASE FOR OPTION TERM
GRANTED FISCAL YEAR PRICE EXPIRATION --------------------
NAME (#) 1997 ($/SHARE) DATE 5%($) 10%($)
---- ------------- ------------------- --------- ---------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Marlin F. Torguson........... 100,000(1) 16.8% $1.86 11/7/02 51,388 113,545
15,000(2) 2.5% $1.6875 5/8/03 8,609 15,455
James E. Ernst............... 50,000(1) 8.4% $1.6875 11/7/02 28,696 51,512
15,000(2) 2.5% $1.6875 5/8/03 8,609 15,455
Jay S. Osman................. 15,000(1) 2.5% $1.6875 11/7/02 8,609 15,455
Robert A. Callaway........... 15,000(1) 2.5% $1.6875 11/7/02 8,609 15,455
Kenneth N. Schultz........... 75,000(1) 12.6% $3.625 7/1/01 0 0
15,000(1) 2.5% $1.6875 11/7/02 8,609 15,455
Juris Basens................. 75,000(1) 12.6% $3.625 7/1/01 0 0
7,500(1) 1.3% $1.6875 11/7/02 14,305 7,727
David L. Paltzik............. 75,000(1) 12.6% $3.625 7/1/01 0 0
3,000(1) 0.5% $1.6875 11/7/02 1,722 3,091
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Options were granted under the Company's 1992 Incentive Stock Option plan.
(2) Non-statutory options.
36
<PAGE> 40
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR END
OPTION/SAR VALUES
The following table provides certain information regarding the exercise of
options to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock during the year ended
December 31, 1997, by the Named Executive Officers and the fiscal year-end value
of stock options held by such officers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
SHARES OPTIONS/SARS AT VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
ACQUIRED ON FISCAL YEAR END(#) IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS/SARS
NAME EXERCISE (#) (EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE) AT FISCAL YEAR END($)(1)
---- ------------ ---------------------------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Marlin F. Torguson............ None 15,000 100,000 - 0 -
James E. Ernst................ None 236,000 419,000 - 0 -
Jay S. Osman.................. None 33,750 71,250 - 0 -
Robert A. Callaway............ None 41,750 54,250 - 0 -
Kenneth N. Schultz............ None 18,750 71,250 - 0 -
Juris Basens.................. None 18,750 63,750 - 0 -
David L. Paltzik.............. None 18,750 59,250 - 0 -
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Based on a fiscal year end of December 31, 1997 and a closing Common Stock
trade price of $1.15625 per share on December 31, 1997. The value of
in-the-money options is calculated as the difference between the fair
market value of the Common Stock underlying the options at fiscal year end
and the exercise price of the options. Exercisable options refer to those
options that are exercisable as of December 31, 1997, while unexercisable
options refer to those options that become exercisable at various times
thereafter.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Each non-employee member of the Board of Directors is entitled to receive
$2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors meeting attended; provided
that from June 1997 through December 1997, the Board of Directors reduced that
fee to $1,500 per meeting. In addition, each non-employee member of the Board of
Directors is entitled to receive $500 for attendance at each meeting of a
committee (other than the Special Committee) of the Board of Directors, provided
that if a meeting of the Board of Directors and a committee were attended by a
director on the same day, the maximum compensation for attendance at such
meetings was $2,000. Each member of the Special Committee, comprised of the two
non-employee directors of the Board of Directors, as identified under "ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS -- Committees of the Board of Directors," is authorized to receive
$225 for each hour so devoted as a member of the Special Committee and a payment
in 1998 of $200,000. The compensation payable to the Special Committee members
is not contingent upon completion of a transaction involving a change in the
control of the Company, such as the Merger, or any other event. In addition, in
November 1997, the Company granted stock options to purchase 15,000 shares of
the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $1.6875 to each member of the
Board of Directors, exercisable after May 8, 1998.
Fees have been paid, and are expected to be paid in the future, to Roger H.
Frommelt's law firm, Frommelt & Eide, Ltd. for services rendered to the Company
See "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS -- Legal Services".
EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
Employment Agreements
MARLIN F. TORGUSON, the Company's Chairman of the Board, originally entered
into an employment agreement with the Company in June 1992, which has since been
amended. Salaries and bonuses under the agreement became discretionary in 1994.
Under his employment agreement, Mr. Torguson is entitled to an automobile
allowance, an annual family travel allowance and a salary and bonus payable in
such amounts and under such terms and conditions as the Board of Directors or
the Compensation Committee may determine.
37
<PAGE> 41
Mr. Torguson's employment with the Company is terminable by the Company or by
Mr. Torguson upon four weeks' prior written notice. If Mr. Torguson's employment
is terminated by the Company without cause, the Company will pay Mr. Torguson a
severance allowance equal to one years' salary at the annual rate of $425,000.
Mr. Torguson's current salary is set at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee. See "Change in Control Severance Plan" below.
JAMES E. ERNST, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer,
entered into an employment agreement dated December 20, 1995 which provided for,
among other things, an initial annual base salary of $425,000, and a $500,000
loan made on December 20, 1995 which has been fully forgiven as of December 20,
1997. Additionally, pursuant to Mr. Ernst's employment agreement, the Company
granted to Mr. Ernst a non-statutory option to purchase up to 490,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock at a price of $3.625 per share which vests over a
5-year period at the rate of 98,000 shares per year, and an incentive stock
option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a price
of $3.625 per share which vests over a five-year period at the rate of 20,000
shares per year. Mr. Ernst's employment agreement is terminable by the Company
or by Mr. Ernst upon 30 days' prior written notice. If Mr. Ernst's employment is
terminated by the Company without cause, the Company will be obligated to pay
Mr. Ernst a severance allowance equal to six months' base salary at the annual
rate being paid at termination. As of April 1, 1997, Mr. Ernst's base salary, by
agreement with the Company, was reduced to $375,000 for the months of April and
May 1997, and as of June 1, 1997 was reduced again to $325,000 for the remainder
of 1997, with an opportunity to receive a bonus of $100,000 if certain
prescribed performance criteria were met. Those performance criteria were not
met, and the bonus was not paid. Mr. Ernst's salary is currently set at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee. See "Change in Control Severance Plan"
below.
JAY S. OSMAN, the Company's Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer entered into an employment agreement in October 1995. The
employment agreement provided for, among other things, an initial annual salary
of $200,000. The term of Mr. Osman's employment under the agreement has been
extended through October 10, 1998, and is then terminable upon 30 days' prior
written notice. If Mr. Osman's employment is terminated by the Company after
October 10, 1998, without cause, the Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Osman
a severance allowance equal to six months' base salary. Any additional salary
over that called for in Mr. Osman's employment agreement is set at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee. See "Change in Control Severance Plan"
below.
ROBERT A. CALLAWAY, the Company's Vice President/General Counsel and
Secretary, entered into an employment agreement with the Company in September
1994. The employment agreement provided for, among other things, an initial
annual salary of $165,000, a one-time bonus of $10,000 and the right to
participate in any bonus plan established by the Company for its employees. Mr.
Callaway's employment agreement is currently terminable by the Company or Mr.
Callaway at any time upon 30 days' prior written notice. Mr. Callaway's salary
is currently set at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. See "Change in
Control Severance Plan" below.
KENNETH N. SCHULTZ, the Company's Vice President/Construction, entered into
an employment agreement with the Company as of June 1997. The employment
agreement, among other things, provided for an initial annual base salary of a
minimum of $200,000, and a lump sum bonus of $82,500 paid upon the commencement
of his employment. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Schultz's term of
employment runs through December 31, 1998. Mr. Schultz's employment may be
terminated immediately for good cause described in the employment agreement, and
upon 30 days notice following December 31, 1998. If Mr. Schultz's employment is
terminated by the Company after December 31, 1998, without good cause, the
Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Schultz a severance allowance equal to six
months base salary. As additional compensation, the Company agreed to issue
25,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Mr. Schultz which are deliverable
over a four year period, with 3,750 shares already delivered, and an additional
5,000 shares scheduled for delivery in June 1998. Pursuant to the employment
agreement, the Company has also granted options to Mr. Schultz for the purchase
of 75,000 shares of the Company's common stock, vesting over four years and
exercisable over five years at $3.625 per share. Any additional salary over that
called for in Mr. Schultz's employment agreement is set at the discretion of the
Compensation Committee. See "Change in Control Severance Plan" below.
38
<PAGE> 42
JURIS BASENS, the manager of the Company's Bossier City casino, entered
into an employment agreement with the Company as of July 1996. The employment
agreement, among other things, provided for an initial annual base salary of
$200,000, and a lump sum bonus of $20,000 paid upon the commencement of his
employment. Effective June 1, 1997, Mr. Basens' salary was adjusted to an annual
rate of $170,000 per year, and he became entitled to participate in a bonus
program established for casino management personnel. Under his employment
agreement, Mr. Basens' term of employment runs through December 31, 1998. Mr.
Basens' employment may be terminated immediately for good cause described in his
employment agreement, and upon 30 days notice following December 31, 1998. If
Mr. Basens' employment is terminated by the Company after December 31, 1998,
without good cause, the Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Basens a severance
allowance equal to six months base salary. As additional compensation, the
Company has agreed to issue 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock, to Mr.
Basens which are deliverable over a four year period, with 3,750 shares already
delivered and an additional 5,000 shares scheduled for delivery in July 1998.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, the Company has also granted Mr. Basens
options for the purchase of 75,000 shares of the Company's common stock, vesting
over four years, and exercisable over five years at $3.625 per share. See
"Change in Control Severance Plan" below.
DAVID L. PALTZIK, the Director of Marketing of the Company's Bossier City
Casino entered into an employment agreement with the Company as of July 1996.
The employment agreement, among other things, provided for an initial annual
base salary of $200,000, and a lump sum bonus of $20,000 paid by the Company
upon the commencement of his employment. Effective June 1, 1997, Mr. Paltzik's
salary was adjusted to an annual rate of $170,000 per year, and he became
entitled to participate in a bonus program established for casino management
personnel. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Paltzik's term of employment runs
through December 31, 1998. Mr. Paltzik's employment may be terminated
immediately for good cause described in his employment agreement, and upon 30
days notice following December 31, 1998. If Mr. Paltzik's employment is
terminated by the Company after December 31, 1998, without good cause, the
Company will be obligated to pay Mr. Paltzik a severance allowance equal to six
months base salary. As additional compensation, the Company has agreed to issue
25,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Mr. Paltzik which are deliverable
over a four year period, with 3,750 shares already delivered, and an additional
5,000 shares scheduled for delivery in July 1998. Pursuant to the employment
agreement, the Company has also granted Mr. Paltzik options for the purchase of
75,000 shares of the Company's common stock, vesting over four years and
exercisable over five years at $3.625 per share.
Change in Control Severance Plan
On January 27, 1998, the Company adopted a Change in Control Severance Plan
(the "Plan") which provides for severance payments to the Company's executive
officers and to the managers of the Company's casinos upon a "Change in Control"
(as defined in the Plan) of the Company. A Change of Control includes, among
other things, a merger, share exchange, sale of assets, or other similar
transaction where the Shareholders before the transaction own 50% or less of the
outstanding common stock of the combined or acquiring entity after the
transaction. In the event of a Change of Control, and, prior to the end of two
years following a Change in Control, if the employment of an executive officer
or manager covered as a participant under the Plan is terminated for other than
cause, or he terminates his employment for a specified reason, such as an
involuntary reduction in salary (defined in the Plan as "Good Reason"), then the
participant will be entitled to a severance payment upon termination equal to
his highest rate of annual compensation (salary and bonus) payable either in the
calendar year prior to the Change in Control, the year in which the Change in
Control occurs, or the year in which his employment is terminated, times a
multiple which is established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee established a multiplier of 1.5 in the case of all participants of the
Plan, except for the Chairman of the Board, and a multiplier of 2.5 for the
Chairman of the Board. In lieu of receiving a severance payment under the Plan,
a participant may elect to receive a severance payment under any other agreement
he may have with the Company. Under the Plan, no severance payment can exceed an
amount which is permitted as deductible by the Company for federal income tax
purposes under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G.
39
<PAGE> 43
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During the year ended December 31, 1997, E. Thomas Welch and Roger H.
Frommelt served as members of the Company's Compensation Committee. During 1997
no member of the Company's Compensation Committee was an officer, former officer
or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except Mr. Frommelt who
served in the uncompensated position of Assistant Secretary of the Company. No
executive officer of the Company served as a member of (i) the compensation
committee of another entity in which one of the executive officers of such
entity served on the Company's Compensation Committee, (ii) the Board of
Directors of another entity in which one of the executive officers of such
entity served on the Company's Compensation Committee, or (iii) the compensation
committee of another entity in which one of the executive officers of such
entity served as a member of the Company's Board of Directors, during the year
ended December 31, 1997.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Introduction. This report is provided by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company (the "Committee") to assist shareholders in
understanding the Committee's objectives and procedures in establishing
compensation programs for the Company's Chief Executive Officer and other
executive officers. The Committee, which consists solely of non-employee
directors, is responsible for establishing and administering the Company's
executive compensation program. The members of the Committee do not receive
awards under the Company's incentive stock option plan or any bonus plan. The
members of the committee have received stock options in their capacity as
members of the Board of Directors.
Compensation Policies. Consistent with the Committee's responsibility for
establishing, implementing and monitoring the Company's executive compensation
program, the Committee has developed several policies. These policies are: (i)
to establish compensation programs designed to attract and retain highly-
qualified executives; (ii) to provide motivation to the Company's executives
through compensation that is correlated to the performance of the executive
officer and to the performance of the Company; (iii) to compensate executives in
a manner which awards both current and long-term performance; and (iv) to
provide executives with a financial interest in the success of the Company
similar to the interests of the Company's shareholders.
Consistent with the aforementioned policies, the Company's current
executive compensation program involves a combination of base salary, short-term
incentive awards and long-term incentive awards. The Committee uses executive
officer base salaries to attract and retain highly-qualified executives. The
grant of bonuses to executive officers are intended to reward short-term
performance, and the grant of stock options by the Company's Stock Option
Committee or the Company's Board of Directors are intended to encourage and
reward executive officers based upon the Company's long-term performance and
provides those executive officers with a financial interest in the success of
the Company which aligns their interests with the interests of the Company's
shareholders.
Base Salary. The Committee periodically reviews salaries paid to executive
officers of other companies in the gaming industry and believes that the
salaries of the Company's executive officers are at levels that are competitive
within the gaming industry. The Committee has the authority to determine the
salaries of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers,
subject to the terms of pre-existing employment contracts. Executive salaries
are based on individual performance, level of responsibility and experience.
Short-Term Incentive Awards. The key performance criterion in determining
bonus payments is the level of income attained by the Company. In April 1997 the
Company established an executive officer bonus pool. The dollar amount of the
pool for 1997 was equal to a percentage of the Company's pre-tax net income for
the year. Only executive officers were eligible to receive bonuses from the
pool. In determining the allocation of bonus payments among the Company's
executives, the Committee evaluates the levels of supervisory or management
responsibilities and considers a number of factors which include initiative,
business judgement, technical expertise and management skills. Because of the
Company's losses in 1997, no bonuses were paid from the bonus pool for that
year.
40
<PAGE> 44
In March 1998, the Compensation Committee proposed a bonus plan, finally
adopted in April 1998, whereby the executive officers of the Company could
receive quarterly and annual cash bonuses for 1998 equal to a maximum of 75% of
his base salary in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, and 50% of their
respective base salaries in the case of all other executive officers. Except for
the Chief Executive Officer, 50% of the bonuses are paid based upon
predetermined quarterly and annual profit goals established for the Company by
the Board of Directors. The remaining 50% (except in the case of the Chairman of
the Board) is discretionary on the part of the Chief Executive Officer, based
upon subjective standards. In the case of the Chief Executive Officer, 75% of
his bonus is based upon the Company achieving its profit goals, and the
subjective portion of the bonus for both the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chairman of the Board is determined by the Compensation Committee. In April
1998, in order to participate in the bonus plan, each executive officer executed
an agreement which provided that he would accept a base salary for 1998 which
(except with respect to the Chief Executive Officer) was lower than that to
which the executive officer was entitled under an existing employment agreement
or lower than that which the executive officer received in 1997.
Long-Term Incentive Awards. The Company's long-term incentive program
consists of stock option and restricted stock grants which are intended to
encourage achievement of long-term goals and objectives consistent with
enhancing shareholder value. These objectives include, but are not limited to,
earnings per share growth, return on invested capital, return on stockholders'
equity and profitability. The Stock Option Committee's awards of stock options
and the Board of Directors' grants of restricted stock are intended to provide
executive officers (as well as other employees) with increased motivation and
incentive to exert their best efforts on behalf of the Company by increasing
their personal stake in the Company's success through the opportunity to acquire
a greater equity interest in the Company and to benefit from appreciation in the
value of the Company's Common Stock. The Stock Option Committee issues all stock
options at an exercise price of not less than the market value of the Company's
Common Stock on the date of grant, thereby ensuring that any value derived from
such options is dependent upon subsequent increases in share value which will be
realized by shareholders generally. The grant of restricted stock to executives
provides incentive to act in the Company's long-term interest. Restricted stock
is also granted for the purpose of obtaining and retaining highly-skilled
executive officers possessing extensive experience in gaming or in other areas
of specialty. Executives must be employed continually in order for shares of
restricted stock and stock options to vest and become exercisable.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. James E. Ernst became the
Company's Chief Executive Officer on December 18, 1995. Under the terms of an
employment agreement originally entered into between the Company and Mr. Ernst
dated December 20, 1995, Mr. Ernst was to receive an initial annual base salary
of $425,000 through December 20, 1997. On April 1, 1997, by agreement between
Mr. Ernst and the Company, Mr. Ernst's salary was reduced to $375,000 for April
and May, and to $325,000 effective June 1, 1997, with an opportunity to receive
a $100,000 bonus if certain objective income performance criteria were met. The
income goals for the Company were not met and the bonus was not paid. In
addition, as negotiated in his employment agreement, the remaining $233,926 of a
$500,000 loan made to Mr. Ernst in December 1995 was forgiven in 1997. Mr.
Ernst's annual base salary for 1998 was established at $375,000 by the
Compensation Committee, with the ability to receive a bonus of up to $281,250,
75% of which is based upon achieving the Company's quarterly or annual income
goals in 1998, and 25% of which is discretionary on the part of the Compensation
Committee based upon subjective criteria. See "EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION -- Employment, Termination and Change in Control Arrangements." The
Committee believes Mr. Ernst's compensation to be reasonable based on the
compensation paid to executives in other gaming companies of similar size and
operation, and the Company's need to retain highly qualified and experienced
executive officers.
Deductibility of Compensation. Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
provides, generally, that compensation paid to certain executive officers of
publicly-held corporation in excess of $1 million in a year is not deductible as
an expense of the Company unless certain conditions are met, including having at
least two outside directors as members of the compensation committee. Only one
of the two current members of the Committee is an "outside director" as that
term is defined by Internal Revenue Service regulations. As described more fully
in the Summary Compensation Table, none of the Company's executive officers
received
41
<PAGE> 45
compensation which exceeded $1 million in 1997 and the Committee believes the
annual compensation of each of the Company's executive officers will be less
than $1 million in 1998. The Committee intends to maximize the deductibility of
executive officer compensation, however, it is conceivable that the Company's
compensation arrangements with executive officers may result in the payment of
compensation which is not deductible.
The foregoing Compensation Committee report will not be deemed incorporated
by reference by any statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement,
or any portion thereof, into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and shall not otherwise be deemed
filed under such Acts.
Respectfully Submitted,
E. Thomas Welch
Roger H. Frommelt
Casino Magic Corp. Compensation Committee
42
<PAGE> 46
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph provides a comparison of cumulative total returns for
the Company, the Dow Jones Equity Market Index (which is considered an indicator
of the overall stock market performance) and the Dow Jones Casinos Index (which
is a published industry index) for the period December 31, 1992 through December
31, 1997. The total return indices assume the investment of $100 in the
Company's Common Stock, the Dow Jones Equity Market Index and the Dow Jones
Casinos Index on December 31, 1992, reflect reinvested dividends and are
weighted on a market capitalization basis at the time of each reported data
point.
The historical stock price performance of the Company's Common Stock shown
below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. The graph below
shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement
incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement, or any portion thereof, into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
COMPARISON OF ANNUAL CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG CASINO MAGIC CORP., DOW JONES EQUITY MARKET INDEX AND DOW JONES CASINOS
INDEX
PERFORMANCE GRAPH DEPICTING COMPARISON
Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1992, in Casino Magic Corp. Common Stock,
the Dow Jones Equity Market Index and Dow Jones Casinos Index.
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
INDEBTEDNESS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
In December 20, 1995, the Company loaned James E. Ernst, the Company's
President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Company's Board of
Directors, $500,000 pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement entered
into between Mr. Ernst and the Company. Each day during the initial two-year
term of Mr. Ernst's employment, approximately $684 of the loan plus interest at
the rate of 10% per annum was forgiven. The loan to Mr. Ernst was reported in
the Company's 1995 financial statements as a compensation expense of $500,000
and a corresponding receivable of $500,000. As of December 20, 1997, the
43
<PAGE> 47
entire balance of the indebtedness was forgiven. See "EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION -- Employment, Termination and Change in Control Arrangements."
LEGAL SERVICES
The law firm of Frommelt & Eide, Ltd. rendered legal services to the
Company during the year ended December 31, 1997. Roger H. Frommelt, a
shareholder and a director of the Company, is the President and a principal
shareholder of Frommelt & Eide, Ltd. The total cost of such legal services
incurred by the Company during 1997 was $88,981. It is anticipated that Mr.
Frommelt's law firm will provide legal services to the Company in the future.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Marlin F. Torguson, James E. Ernst, Robert A. Callaway, Jay S. Osman and
Kenneth N. Schultz, who are executive officers of the Company, have each entered
into employment agreements with the Company. See "EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION -- Employment, Termination and Change-in-Control Arrangements."
44
<PAGE> 48
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
SHARE OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information as of the record date
with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by: (i) each
director; (ii) the Named Executive Officers; and (iii) all current executive
officers (regardless of salary and bonus level) and directors as a group. Unless
otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed in the table below have sole voting
and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES PERCENTAGE OF
BENEFICIALLY OUTSTANDING
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED SHARES(10)
------------------------------------ ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Marlin F. Torguson.................................... 7,698,000(1) 21.5%
James E. Ernst........................................ 366,000(2) 1.0%
Roger H. Frommelt..................................... 37,624(3) *
E. Thomas Welch....................................... 19,000(4) *
Jay S. Osman.......................................... 97,250(5) *
Robert A. Callaway.................................... 53,750(6) *
Kenneth N. Schultz.................................... 46,250(7) *
Juris Basens.......................................... 46,250(8) *
David L. Paltzik...................................... 48,250(9) *
All current executive officers and directors as a
group (7 persons)................................... 8,317,874(10) 23.0%
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* Less than one percent.
(1) Includes 15,000 shares that Mr. Torguson has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options.
(2) Includes 251,000 shares that Mr. Ernst has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options.
(3) Includes 15,000 shares that Mr. Frommelt has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options.
(4) Includes 15,000 shares that Mr. Welch has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options and 4,000 shares held beneficially by
Mr. Welch under a 401(k) Plan.
(5) Includes 37,500 shares that Mr. Osman has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options, and 5,000 shares to which Mr. Osman
is entitled as the result of a stock grant, but which have not yet been
issued.
(6) Includes 45,500 shares that Mr. Callaway has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options, and 5,000 shares to which Mr.
Callaway is entitled as the result of a stock grant, but which have not yet
been issued.
(7) Includes 37,500 shares that Mr. Schultz has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options and 5,000 shares to which Mr. Schultz
is entitled as the result of a stock grant, but which have not yet been
issued.
(8) Includes 37,500 shares that Mr. Basens has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options and 5,000 shares to which Mr. Basens
is entitled as the result of a stock grant, but which have not yet been
issued.
(9) Includes 37,500 shares that Mr. Paltzik has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options and 5,000 shares to which Mr. Paltzik
is entitled as the result of a stock grant, but which have not yet been
issued.
45
<PAGE> 49
(10) The percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock as shown in the table
above is calculated based upon 35,722,124 shares outstanding as of the
close of business on July 24, 1998 and assumes that in each case the person
only, or the group only, currently exercised his or its rights to acquire
all shares under outstanding stock options, or received stock grants, which
have vested or will vest on or before September 11, 1998, except as
otherwise stated.
SHARE OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth certain information as of the record date
with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by all persons
known by the Company to be the owner of more than five percent of the Company's
outstanding Common Stock.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES PERCENTAGE OF
BENEFICIALLY OUTSTANDING
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED SHARES(2)
------------------------------------ ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Marlin F. Torguson..................................... 7,698,000(1) 21.5%
711 Casino Magic Drive
Bay Saint Louis, MS 39520
Grand Casinos, Inc..................................... 2,125,000 5.9%
130 Cheshire Lane
Minnetonka, MN 55305
Hollywood Park, Inc.................................... 8,465,900(3) 23.7%
1050 South Prairie Ave.
Inglewood, CA 90301
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Includes 15,000 shares that Mr. Torguson has the right to acquire upon
exercise of outstanding stock options.
(2) The percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock as shown in the table
above is calculated based upon 35,722,124 shares outstanding as of the
close of business on July 24, 1998.
(3) Includes 7,683,000 shares of Common Stock owned beneficially and of record
by Marlin F. Torguson. Under an agreement with Hollywood Park, Mr. Torguson
has agreed to vote his shares in favor of the Merger, and has granted an
irrevocable proxy to Hollywood Park for that purpose. See "THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT -- The Shareholder Agreement".
ARRANGEMENTS WHICH COULD RESULT IN A CHANGE IN CONTROL
On February 19, 1998, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement which
contemplates the Company becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Hollywood Park.
See "APPROVAL OF THE MERGER". In connection with the Merger Agreement, Mr.
Torguson entered into the Shareholder Agreement pursuant to which he granted
Hollywood Park a proxy to vote his shares in favor of approving the Merger. See
"THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENT -- The Shareholder Agreement."
Marlin F. Torguson has pledged approximately 7,000,000 of his shares of
Common Stock to secure two loans aggregating approximately $4,500,000. A default
in the payment of those loans could result in the sale of the shares held as
security, and thus a change in control of the Company.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals that Shareholders may wish to present at the annual meeting of
the Company's shareholders in 1999 must be received by the Company prior to
December 11, 1998, in order to be included in the proxy statement and form of
proxy relating to that meeting.
46
<PAGE> 50
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Arthur Andersen, L.L.P., certified public accountants, audited the accounts
of the Company for the year ending December 31, 1997. A representative of such
accounting firm will be at the Meeting, and will be available to respond to
appropriate questions. Arthur Andersen, L.L.P. has audited the accounts of the
Company since May 13, 1993.
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date hereof, the Company does not intend to present, nor has it
been informed that other persons intend to present, any matters for action at
the Meeting other than those specifically referred to herein. If, however, any
other matters should properly come before the Meeting, it is the intention of
the persons named in the proxies to vote the shares represented thereby in
accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
A FORM OF PROXY IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR USE. PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE
FORM OF PROXY AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. THE PROMPT RETURN OF YOUR FORM OF
PROXY WILL BE APPRECIATED.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The Company is allowed to "incorporate by reference" information into this
Proxy Statement by referring to another document the Company has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The information incorporated by reference is
deemed to be part of this Proxy Statement, except for any information superseded
by information in this Proxy Statement. These documents contain important
information about the Company and its financial condition. Specifically, the
information being incorporated by reference is contained in the Annual Report of
the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, and the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998. A copy
of the Company's 1997 Annual Report which includes the Form 10-K as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1998, and a copy of the Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 3, 1998, accompany this Proxy Statement.
47
<PAGE> 51
ANNEX A
PLAN OF MERGER
OF
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND HP ACQUISITION II, INC.
WHEREAS, Casino Magic Corp. (the "Company") is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, HP Acquisition II, Inc. ("HP Acquisition") is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Company, HP Acquisition and Hollywood Park, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 19,
1998 (the "Agreement") which contemplates that upon satisfaction of certain
conditions HP Acquisition will merge with and into the Company.
WHEREAS, the Agreement contemplates that the terms under which HP
Acquisition shall be merged into the Company are to be set forth in this Plan of
Merger.
WHEREAS, on February 19, 1998, the respective Boards of Directors of the
Company and HP Acquisition approved (i) the execution and delivery of the
Agreement; (ii) this Plan of Merger, and (iii) the submission of this Plan of
Merger and the Agreement to the respective shareholders of the Company and HP
Acquisition for approval as required by law.
THE MERGER
SECTION 1. THE MERGER. In accordance with the provisions of the Minnesota
Business Corporation Act (the "MBCA"), at the Effective Time (as defined in
Section 2), HP Acquisition shall be merged with and into the Company (the
"Merger"). Following the Merger, the separate existence of HP Acquisition shall
cease and the Company shall be the surviving corporation in the Merger and
retain the name "Casino Magic Corp."
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE TIME OF MERGER. The Merger shall become effective
upon the filing of Articles of Merger containing this Plan of Merger and such
other documents as are required by the MBCA to be filed with the Minnesota
Secretary of State (the time of such filing being the "Effective Time").
SECTION 3. ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS OF THE SURVIVING
CORPORATION. The Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Company at the
Effective Time shall remain the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the
Company as the surviving corporation in the Merger.
SECTION 4. BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE SURVIVING CORPORATION.
The directors and officers of the Company at the Effective Time shall continue
to be the directors and officers of the Company, as the surviving corporation in
the Merger, until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed.
SECTION 5. CONVERSION OF SHARES. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the
Merger and without any action on the part of the holders thereof:
a. each share of $0.01 par value common stock of the Company which is
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time which is
held by a shareholder who does not dissent from the Merger as provided
under Sections 302A.471 and 302A.473 of the MBCA, shall, be converted into
the right to receive $2.27 (the "Merger Consideration"); and
b. each share of capital stock of HP Acquisition which is issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into
and become a fully paid and nonassessable share of the $0.01 par value
common stock of the Company.
<PAGE> 52
SECTION 6. EXCHANGE OF OPTIONS. Promptly following the Effective Time, as
provided in the Agreement, Hollywood Park, Inc. will exchange options to
purchase shares of the $0.10 par value common stock of Hollywood Park, Inc. for
the options to purchase shares of the $0.01 par value common stock of the
Company which are outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. Each such
existing option of the Company which is outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time will be exchanged for a new option having similar terms and
conditions except that the exercise price of the new option shall be obtained by
(i) dividing the exercise price of the old option by $2.27, and (ii) multiplying
the resulting amount by $15.075; and that the number of shares purchasable under
the new option shall be obtained by multiplying the number of shares purchasable
under the existing option by 0.15058.
SECTION 7. DISSENTING SHARES. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan of
Merger to the contrary, shares of the Company which are held immediately prior
to the Effective Time by shareholders that dissent from the Merger in compliance
with all relevant provisions of Sections 302A.471 and 302A.473 of the MBCA shall
not be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration, but shall
instead be surrendered to the Company and the Company shall make payment
therefore pursuant to such provisions of the MBCA.
SECTION 8. PAYMENT OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION. Prior to the Effective
Time, Hollywood Park, Inc. shall appoint a bank or trust company as its paying
agent (the "Paying Agent") and deposit with the Paying Agent immediately
available funds in an amount sufficient to pay the aggregate Merger
Consideration. Promptly following the Effective Time, Hollywood Park, Inc. will
cause the Paying Agent to mail to each record owner of common stock of the
Company outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time instructions for the
surrender to the Paying Agent of certificates for the shares in exchange for the
payment of the Merger Consideration. The Merger Consideration will be payable
upon surrender of the certificates for the shares surrendered accompanied by a
properly completed letter of instruction and transmittal (the "Transmittal
Document") in such form as the Paying Agent may reasonably require to be used.
Risk of loss and title to certificates being surrendered shall pass only upon
the proper delivery of the certificate to the Paying Agent. Upon receipt by the
Paying Agent of the certificate and the Transmittal Document, the certificate
shall be cancelled and the Paying Agent shall effect the payment of the Merger
Consideration as provided for the in the Transmittal Document.
SECTION 9. AMENDMENT OF PLAN OF MERGER. Following approval of this Plan of
Merger by the shareholders of the Company and HP Acquisition, but prior to the
Effective Time, the respective Boards of Directors of the Company and HP
Acquisition shall have the authority to amend Sections 5 and 6 of this Plan of
Merger solely for the purpose of implementing an increase in the amount of the
Merger Consideration as may be agreed to between the Company and Hollywood Park,
Inc. pursuant to the Agreement.
2
<PAGE> 53
ANNEX B
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
DATED AS OF
FEBRUARY 19, 1998
AMONG
CASINO MAGIC CORP.,
HOLLYWOOD PARK, INC.
AND
HP ACQUISITION II, INC.
<PAGE> 54
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Glossary of Defined Terms.............................. iii
1. THE MERGER AND RELATED MATTERS......................... 1
1.1 The Merger....................................... 1
1.2 Effective Time of the Merger..................... 1
1.3 Conversion of Common Shares...................... 1
1.4 Dissenting Shares................................ 1
1.5 [RESERVED]....................................... 2
1.6 [RESERVED]....................................... 2
1.7 Stock Options.................................... 2
1.8 Convertible Securities........................... 3
1.9 Closing.......................................... 3
2. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY.......... 3
2.1 Corporate Existence and Power.................... 3
2.2 Corporate Authorization.......................... 3
2.3 Governmental Authorization....................... 4
2.4 Non-Contravention................................ 4
2.5 Capitalization................................... 5
2.6 Subsidiaries..................................... 5
2.7 SEC Filings...................................... 6
2.8 Financial Statements............................. 7
2.9 Disclosure Documents............................. 7
2.10 Absence of Certain Changes........................ 7
2.11 Licenses and Compliance........................... 8
2.12 No Undisclosed Liabilities........................ 9
2.13 Litigation and Administrative Matters............. 9
2.14 Taxes............................................. 10
2.15 ERISA............................................. 11
2.16 Material Contracts................................ 13
2.17 Insurance Coverage................................ 13
2.18 Finders' Fees..................................... 14
2.19 Employees......................................... 14
2.20 Other Information................................. 15
2.21 Environmental Matters............................. 15
2.22 Indebtedness to and from Officers, Directors and
Shareholders....................................... 17
2.23 Vote Required..................................... 17
2.24 Intellectual Property Rights...................... 17
2.25 Takeover Provisions Inapplicable.................. 17
2.26 Fairness Opinion.................................. 18
2.27 No Excess Parachute Payments...................... 18
2.28 Real Property..................................... 18
2.29 Title to Assets, Liens............................ 19
3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER AND MERGER
SUBSIDIARY............................................. 19
3.1 Corporate Existence and Power.................... 19
3.2 Corporate Authorization.......................... 20
3.3 Governmental Authorization....................... 20
3.4 NonContravention................................. 20
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE> 55
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
3.5 Licenses......................................... 21
3.6 Litigation and Administrative Matters............ 21
3.7 Financing........................................ 22
4. COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY............................... 22
4.1 Conduct of the Company........................... 22
4.2 Other Offers..................................... 23
4.3 Shareholder Meeting.............................. 24
5. COVENANTS OF BUYER..................................... 24
5.1 Obligations of Merger Subsidiary................. 24
5.2 Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and
Insurance.......................................... 24
5.3 Employee Benefit Plans........................... 25
5.4 Employee Matters................................. 25
6. COVENANTS OF BUYER, MERGER SUBSIDIARY AND THE
COMPANY................................................ 25
6.1 Best Efforts..................................... 25
6.2 Certain Filings.................................. 26
6.3 Public Announcements............................. 26
6.4 Further Assurances............................... 26
6.5 Preparation of Proxy Statement................... 26
6.6 Access to Information............................ 26
6.7 Notices of Certain Events........................ 27
7. CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER............................... 27
7.1 Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party...... 27
7.2 Conditions to the Obligations of Buyer and Merger
Subsidiary......................................... 28
7.3 Conditions to Obligations of the Company......... 28
8. TERMINATION............................................ 29
8.1 Termination...................................... 29
8.2 Effect of Termination............................ 30
9. MISCELLANEOUS.......................................... 30
9.1 Notices.......................................... 30
9.2 No Survival of Representations and Warranties.... 31
9.3 Amendments; No Waivers........................... 31
9.4 Expenses......................................... 31
9.5 Successors and Assigns........................... 31
9.6 Governing Law.................................... 31
9.7 Counterparts; Effectiveness...................... 32
9.8 Superseding Agreement, Parties in Interest....... 32
9.9 Schedules and Exhibits........................... 32
9.10 Invalid Provisions................................ 32
</TABLE>
ii
<PAGE> 56
GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS
The following terms, when used in this Agreement, have the meanings
ascribed to them in the corresponding Sections of this Agreement listed below:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
"ACQUISITION PROPOSAL"................... Section 4.2
"AFFILIATE".............................. Section 2.21.8.1
"AGREEMENT".............................. Preamble
"ARGENTINA AUTHORITIES".................. Section 2.3.4
"BALANCE SHEET DATE"..................... Section 2.8
"BALANCE SHEET".......................... Section 2.8
"BEST KNOWLEDGE OF THE COMPANY".......... Section 2.11
"BUYER".................................. Preamble
"BUYER COMMON STOCK"..................... Section 1.7
"BUYER GAMING LAWS"...................... Section 3.3.4
"BUYER PERMITS".......................... Section 3.5
"BUYER PLANS"............................ Section 5.3
"BUYER SEC REPORTS"...................... Section 3.5
"BUYER SUBSTITUTE OPTION"................ Section 1.7.1
"CERCLA"................................. Section 2.21.8.3
"CLOSING"................................ Section 1.9
"CLOSING DATE"........................... Section 1.9
"COBRA".................................. Section 2.15.9
"CODE"................................... Section 2.14.10
"COMPANY 10-K"........................... Section 2.6.1
"COMPANY"................................ Preamble
"COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS"........... Section 2.8
"COMPANY GAMING LAWS".................... Section 2.3.4
"COMPANY LEASED PROPERTY"................ Section 2.28
"COMPANY OWNED PROPERTY"................. Section 2.28
"COMPANY PERMITS"........................ Section 2.11
"COMPANY REAL PROPERTY".................. Section 2.28
"COMPANY SEC REPORTS".................... Section 2.7.1.4
"COMPANY SECURITIES"..................... Section 2.5.3
"CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT".............. Section 6.6
"CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES"................. Section 1.8
"DEBT INSTRUMENTS"....................... Section 2.4.3
"DISSENTING SHARES"...................... Section 1.4
"EFFECTIVE TIME"......................... Section 1.2
"ENCUMBRANCE"............................ Section 2.28.2
"ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIM".................... Section 2.21.8.2
"ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS"..................... Section 2.21.8.3
"ERISA".................................. Section 2.15.1
"EXCHANGE ACT"........................... Section 2.3.3
"GAAP"................................... Section 2.8
"GOVERNMENTAL OR REGULATORY AUTHORITY"... Section 2.4.2
"HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE".................... Section 2.21.8.4
"HSR ACT"................................ Section 2.3.2
"INDEMNIFIED PARTY"...................... Section 5.2.1
"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY".................. Section 2.24
</TABLE>
iii
<PAGE> 57
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
"IRS".................................... Section 2.15.2
"LEASE DOCUMENTS"........................ Section 2.28.3
"LIEN"................................... Section 2.4.4
"LOUISIANA AUTHORITIES".................. Section 2.3.4
"MAGIC SHARES"........................... Section 1.3.1
"MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE"................ Section 2.10.1
"MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT"................ Section 2.1
"MATERIAL CONTRACTS"..................... Section 2.16.3
"MERGER CONSIDERATION"................... Section 1.3.1
"MERGER SUBSIDIARY"...................... Preamble
"MERGER"................................. Recitals
"MINNESOTA LAW".......................... Section 1.2
"MISSISSIPPI AUTHORITIES"................ Section 2.3.4
"NEVADA AUTHORITIES"..................... Section 3.3.4
"NON-PLAN OPTIONS"....................... Section 1.7.1
"OPTION PLAN"............................ Section 1.7.1
"PERMITTED ENCUMBRANCE".................. Section 2.28.2
"PERSON"................................. Section 2.21.8.5
"PERSONNEL".............................. Section 4.2
"PLAN"................................... Section 2.15.1
"PLAN OF MERGER"......................... Section 1.1
"PROXY STATEMENT"........................ Section 2.9.1
"RCRA"................................... Section 2.21.8.3
"REAL PROPERTY".......................... Section 2.21.2
"REQUESTING PARTY"....................... Section 6.6
"RESTRICTIONS"........................... Section 2.28.4
"RETURNS"................................ Section 2.14.1
"RIGHT-TO-KNOW-ACT"...................... Section 2.21.8.3
"SEC".................................... Section 1.7.2
"SECURITIES ACT"......................... Section 2.7.2
"SIGNING PRICE".......................... Section 1.7.1
"SUBSIDIARY SECURITIES".................. Section 2.6.2.2
"SUBSIDIARY" OR "SUBSIDIARIES"........... Section 2.6.1
"SUPERIOR PROPOSAL"...................... Section 4.2
"SURVIVING CORPORATION".................. Section 1.1
"TAX" OR "TAXES OR "TAXABLE"............. Section 2.14.14
</TABLE>
iv
<PAGE> 58
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER dated as of February 19, 1998 (this
"Agreement") among CASINO MAGIC CORP., a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"),
HOLLYWOOD PARK, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Buyer"), and HP ACQUISITION II,
INC., a Minnesota corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Buyer ("Merger
Subsidiary").
A. Buyer, the Company and Merger Subsidiary wish to provide for the
terms and conditions of the following described business combination in
which Merger Subsidiary will be merged (the "Merger") with and into the
Company.
B. Simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, certain
shareholders of the Company have agreed in writing to vote their respective
shares of capital stock of the Company in favor of the Merger.
C. The parties hereto desire to make certain representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the Merger and also
to prescribe various conditions to the Merger.
Accordingly, and in consideration of the representations, warranties,
agreements and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. THE MERGER AND RELATED MATTERS
1.1 The Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective
Time (as hereinafter defined), Merger Subsidiary shall be merged with and into
the Company pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein and in a plan
of merger (the "Plan of Merger"). At the Effective Time, the separate existence
of Merger Subsidiary shall cease and the Company shall continue as the surviving
corporation (the "Surviving Corporation").
1.2 Effective Time of the Merger.
As soon as practicable (but in no event later than three (3) business days)
after each of the conditions set forth in Section 7 hereof (other than the
condition that articles of merger be filed and become effective) have been
satisfied or waived, the Company and Merger Subsidiary will file, or cause to be
filed, articles of merger with the Secretary of State of Minnesota which
articles of merger shall be in the form required by and executed in accordance
with the applicable provisions of the Business Corporation Act of Minnesota
("Minnesota Law"). The Merger shall become effective at the time the articles of
merger for such merger is filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota (the
"Effective Time").
1.3 Conversion of Common Shares.
At the Effective Time:
1.3.1 Except as otherwise provided herein, each share of common stock of
the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the "Magic Shares"), issued and
outstanding immediately prior thereto (except for Dissenting Shares as defined
in Section 1.4 hereof) shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on
the part of the holder thereof, be converted into the right to receive two
dollars twenty-seven cents ($2.27) in cash (the "Merger Consideration"); and
1.3.2 Each issued and outstanding share of capital stock of Merger
Subsidiary shall be converted into and become one fully paid and nonassessable
share of Common Stock, $.01 par value, of the Surviving Corporation. Each stock
certificate of Merger Subsidiary evidencing ownership of any such shares shall
continue to evidence ownership of such converted shares of Common Stock of the
Surviving Corporation.
1.4 Dissenting Shares
Any Magic Shares held by a holder who dissents from the Merger and becomes
entitled to obtain payment for the value of such Magic Shares pursuant to the
applicable provisions of Minnesota Law shall be
1
<PAGE> 59
herein called "Dissenting Shares." Any Dissenting Shares shall not, after the
Effective Time, be entitled to vote for any purpose or receive any dividends or
other distributions and shall not be converted into the right to receive the
Merger Consideration; provided, however, that Magic Shares held by a dissenting
shareholder who subsequently withdraws a demand for payment, fails to comply
fully with the requirements of Minnesota Law, or otherwise fails to establish
the right of such shareholder to be paid the value of such shareholders' shares
under Minnesota Law shall be deemed to be converted into the right to receive
the Merger Consideration pursuant to the terms and conditions referred to above.
1.5 [Reserved]
1.6 [Reserved]
1.7 Stock Options.
1.7.1 All options to acquire Magic Shares issued under the Company's 1992
Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan") and granted outside of the
Option Plan ("Non-Plan Options") outstanding at the Effective Time shall be
exchanged upon the Effective Time of the Merger and the holders thereof shall be
entitled to receive options to acquire the Buyer's Common Stock, par value $.10
per share ("Buyer Common Stock"), at an exercise price and on other terms as
follows. All options issued under the Option Plan and the Non-Plan Options shall
be exchanged for options to purchase Buyer Common Stock (the "Buyer Substitute
Option") at an exercise price equal to the number obtained by (i) dividing the
current exercise price of such options to purchase Magic Shares by the Merger
Consideration, and (ii) multiplying the resulting amount by the Signing Price.
As used herein, "Signing Price" shall mean the average closing sales price of
the Buyer Common Stock for the ten trading days immediately preceding the date
on which this Agreement is executed. The number of shares into which any such
Buyer Substitute Option shall be exercisable shall be the number obtained by (x)
dividing the Merger Consideration by the Signing Price and multiplying such
quotient by (y) the number of Magic Shares subject to the option to buy Magic
Shares that was exchanged for such option to acquire shares of Buyer Common
Stock. For example, if (A) the exercise price of a current Company option was
$4.00, (B) the Merger Consideration was $2.00, (C) the Signing Price was $16.00,
and (D) the number of Company options held by a holder was 1,000, then on the
Effective Date the holder would receive in exchange for his Company options,
options to purchase an aggregate of 125 shares of Buyers' Common Stock (two
dollars divided by sixteen dollars times 1,000 shares) at an exercise price of
$32.00 per share (e.g., (four dollars divided by two dollars) times sixteen
dollars). The vesting of each Buyer Substitute Option that is exchanged for
options to purchase Magic Shares shall be the same as the vesting with respect
to the exchanged option to purchase Magic Shares. In all other respects, the
terms of the Buyer Substitute Options shall be governed by the provisions of
Buyer's stock option plan so long as, compared to the provision of the Option
Plan or the Non-Plan Options, as applicable, the provisions of the Buyer Option
Plan do not materially adversely affect the rights of the holders of options to
purchase Magic Shares, in which case such provisions of the Buyer Substitute
Options shall be governed by the terms of the Option Plan or the Non-Plan
Options, respectively. As promptly as practicable after the Effective Time,
Buyer shall issue to each holder of an option under the Option Plan or a
Non-Plan Option a written instrument evidencing Buyer's assumption of such
option on the terms provided herein.
1.7.2 Buyer shall take all corporate action necessary to reserve for
issuance a sufficient number of shares of Buyer Common Stock for delivery with
respect to options to purchase Magic Shares issued under the Option Plan and the
Non-Plan Options, as adjusted in accordance with this Section 1.7. As soon as
practicable after the Effective Time, Buyer shall (a) file registration
statements on Form S-8 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") under the Securities Act (or any successor or other appropriate form)
with respect to the shares of Buyer Common Stock subject to Buyer Substitute
Options and shall use its best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such
registration statement or registration statements (and maintain the current
status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained therein) for so long as such
options remain outstanding and (b) cause the shares of Buyer Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of the Buyer Substitute Options to be listed on the New
York Stock Exchange. With respect to those individuals who subsequent to the
Merger will be subject to the reporting requirements under Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), where
applicable, Buyer shall
2
<PAGE> 60
administer the Buyer Substitute Options in a manner that complies with Rule
16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
1.8 Convertible Securities.
On the Effective Time, the sole right of the holders of those certain
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 980,000 Magic Shares prior to October 22,
1998 at a price of $2.75 per share and 50,000 Magic Shares prior to October 5,
1999 at a price of $7.35 per share (the "Convertible Securities") which are
outstanding at the Effective Time shall be the right to receive the Merger
Consideration upon payment of the exercise price of the Convertible Securities.
1.9 Closing.
Subject to the provisions of Section 7 hereof, the closing of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the "Closing") shall take place as
soon as practicable (but in no event later than three (3) business days) after
satisfaction of all of the conditions to Closing at the offices of Irell &
Manella LLP, 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900, Los Angeles, California 90067,
or such other place and time as the parties may mutually agree. The date on
which the Closing actually occurs is herein referred to as the "Closing Date."
2. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company represents and warrants to Buyer that:
2.1 Corporate Existence and Power.
The Company is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in
active status under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and has all corporate
powers and authority required to carry on its business as now conducted. The
Company is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good
standing in each jurisdiction in which the character of the property owned or
leased by it or the nature of its activities makes such qualification necessary,
except for those jurisdictions in which the failure to be so qualified,
individually or in the aggregate, are not and could not be reasonably expected
to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. As used herein, "Material
Adverse Effect" with respect to any person means a material adverse effect on
the financial condition, business, assets or results of operations of such
person and its Subsidiaries (as defined in Section 2.6) taken as a whole;
provided however, that, with respect to the Company, Material Adverse Effect
shall not include any state of facts, event, change or effect (i) disclosed in
this Agreement (excluding matters disclosed in the Company's SEC Reports (as
defined herein) unless such matters are specifically disclosed in this Agreement
or the Schedules hereto) or any schedule to this Agreement to the extent of the
Company's estimate of the liability or obligation associated with such matters
(but to such extent, only if an estimate has been made) and excluding the matter
disclosed under the heading "Louisiana Gaming Control Board" on Schedule 2.13 or
(ii) generally affecting companies in the gaming industry nationally (e.g.,
imposition of a national gaming tax). The Company has heretofore delivered to
Buyer true and complete copies of the articles of incorporation and bylaws (or
equivalent charter documents) of the Company and each Subsidiary of the Company
in each case as currently in effect. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is in violation of any term or provision of its charter, bylaws, or
other organizational document where the consequence of such violation could
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
2.2 Corporate Authorization.
The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement
and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby are
within the Company's corporate powers and, except for any required approval by
the Company's shareholders in connection with the consummation of the Merger,
have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action. This Agreement has
been duly and validly executed by the Company and, subject to obtaining the
approval of the Merger by the Company's
3
<PAGE> 61
shareholders, constitutes a valid and binding agreement of the Company
enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as enforceability may be
limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws
affecting enforcement of creditors rights generally and by general equitable
principles, regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding
in equity or at law. The Board of Directors of the Company (at a meeting duly
called and held) has by the requisite vote of the directors present (a)
determined that the Merger is advisable and fair and in the best interests of
the Company and its stockholders, (b) approved the Merger and this Agreement in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 302A.613 of the Minnesota Law and the
Company's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, (c) recommended the adoption and
approval of this Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby to the holders of the Magic Shares and directed that the Merger and this
Agreement may be submitted for consideration by the Company's shareholders at
the meeting of the Company's shareholders, and (d) taken all necessary steps to
render the restrictions of Sections 302A.671 of the Minnesota Law inapplicable
to the Merger and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all outstanding Magic Shares
entitled to vote approving this Agreement is the only vote of the holders of any
class or series of the Company's capital stock necessary to approve this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
2.3 Governmental Authorization.
The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement
and the consummation of the Merger by the Company require no action by or in
respect of, or filing with, any governmental body, agency, official or
authority, other than such consents, approvals, actions, filings and notices
which the failure to make or obtain could not be reasonably expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company or on the ability of the Company to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and:
2.3.1 the filing of articles of merger in accordance with Minnesota Law
and the filing of appropriate documents with relevant authorities of other
states in which the Company is qualified to do business;
2.3.2 compliance with any applicable requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act");
2.3.3 compliance with any applicable requirements of the Exchange Act, and
the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and
2.3.4 compliance with any applicable requirements of the Mississippi
Gaming Control Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the
"Mississippi Authorities") and the Louisiana Gaming Control Act and the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Louisiana Authorities") and, with
respect to the Provincial Government of Neuquen, Argentina (the "Argentina
Authorities"), no approval or consent (but merely notice) is required
(collectively, the "Company Gaming Laws"); provided, that no representation or
warranty is made herein with respect to any requirement to obtain any consent or
approval of the Argentina Authorities in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby as a result of the condition of or any action taken by Buyer
or Merger Subsidiary.
2.4 Non-Contravention.
Except as set forth on Schedule 2.4 hereto, the execution, delivery and
performance by the Company of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company
of the transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not:
2.4.1 contravene or conflict with the articles of incorporation or bylaws
of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company;
2.4.2 subject to obtaining the consents and approvals described in Section
2.3, contravene or conflict with or constitute a violation of any provision of
any law, regulation, judgment, injunction, order or decree of any court,
tribunal, arbitrator, authority, agency, commission, official or other
instrumentality of the United States; any foreign country; any sovereign nation,
or any domestic, foreign or other state, country, city of other political
subdivision (a "Governmental or Regulatory Authority") binding upon or
applicable to the Company
4
<PAGE> 62
or any Subsidiary of the Company, except such contraventions, conflicts and
violations which could not, individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company or its ability to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby;
2.4.3 subject to obtaining the consents and approvals described in Section
2.3, constitute a breach or violation of or default under (with or without
notice or lapse of time or both) or give rise to a right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration of any right or obligation of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company or to a loss of any benefit to which the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company is entitled under any provision of any agreement,
contract, lease, indenture or other instrument binding upon the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, or their respective properties or assets, including
the Company's 13% Series B First Mortgage Notes due 2003 with contingent
interest and 11.5% First Mortgage Notes due 2001 (collectively, the "Debt
Instruments") or any license, franchise, permit or other similar authorization
held by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company except such defaults,
terminations, cancellations or accelerations which could not, individually or in
the aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company or its ability to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby; or
2.4.4 subject to obtaining the consents and approvals described in Section
2.3, result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of the
Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, except such Liens which could not,
individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company or its ability to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby. For purposes of this Agreement, "Lien" means, with respect
to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or
encumbrance of any kind in respect of such asset.
2.5 Capitalization.
The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 50,000,000 shares
of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 2,500,000 shares of undesignated
stock. As of February 17, 1998, there were 35,722,124 issued and outstanding
Magic Shares and no issued and outstanding shares of undesignated stock. All
outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. As of the date of this
Agreement, there were qualified employee stock options to purchase an aggregate
of 1,274,200 Magic Shares pursuant to the Option Plan, non-qualified director
options to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 Magic Shares pursuant to the Option
Plan, stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,027,500 Magic Shares outside
of the Option Plan as indicated in Schedule 2.5, and warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 1,030,000 Magic Shares. Except as set forth in this Section or in
Schedule 2.5, there are outstanding:
2.5.1 no shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the
Company;
2.5.2 no securities of the Company convertible into or exchangeable for
shares of capital stock or voting securities of the Company; and
2.5.3 no options or other rights to acquire from the Company, and no
obligation of the Company to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or voting
securities of the Company (the items in Sections 2.5.1, 2.5.2 and 2.5.3 being
referred to collectively as the "Company Securities"). There are no outstanding
contractual obligations of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any Company Securities.
2.6 Subsidiaries.
2.6.1 Each Subsidiary of the Company is a corporation duly incorporated,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of
incorporation, has all corporate powers and authority required to carry on its
business as now conducted and is duly qualified to do business as a foreign
corporation and is in good standing and licensed in each jurisdiction in which
the character of the property owned or leased by it or the nature of its
activities make such qualification or licensing necessary, except for those
jurisdictions in which failure to be so qualified or licensed could not,
individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company. For purposes of this Agreement, as to any person,
5
<PAGE> 63
"Subsidiary" or "Subsidiaries" means an entity or entities of which securities
or other ownership interests having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of
the board of directors or other persons performing similar functions are
directly or indirectly owned by such person and which is a "significant
subsidiary," or are significant subsidiaries, as defined in Rule 1-02 of
Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act. All Subsidiaries of the
Company and their respective jurisdictions of incorporation are identified in
the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1996, as amended (the "Company 10-K").
2.6.2 Except as set forth in Schedule 2.6.2 hereto, all of the outstanding
capital stock of, or other ownership interests in, each Subsidiary of the
Company is owned by the Company, directly or indirectly, free and clear of any
Lien and free of any other limitation or restriction including any restriction
on the right to vote, sell or otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other
ownership interests, other than limitations or restrictions pursuant to
applicable gaming laws and regulations. Except as set forth on Schedule 2.6.2
hereto, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding:
2.6.2.1 Company Securities, or Subsidiary Securities (as defined
herein), which are convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital
stock or other voting securities or ownership interests in any Subsidiary;
and
2.6.2.2 Options or other rights to acquire from the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, or other obligation of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or
other ownership interests in, or any securities convertible into or
exchangeable for any capital stock, voting securities or ownership
interests in, any Subsidiary (the items in Sections 2.6.2.1 and 2.6.2.2
being referred to collectively as the "Subsidiary Securities"). There are
no outstanding obligations of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company
to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any outstanding Subsidiary
Securities or to provide funds to or make any investment (in the form of a
loan, capital contribution or otherwise) in any Subsidiary of the Company
or other person.
2.6.2.3 Voting trusts, proxies or other commitments, understanding
restrictions or arrangements in favor of any person other than the Company
or a Subsidiary that is wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by the
Company with respect to the voting of or right to participate in dividends
or other earnings or any capital stock of any Subsidiary of the Company.
2.6.2.4 Interests of the Company in any other corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other business association or entity.
2.7 SEC Filings.
2.7.1 The Company has delivered or made available to Buyer:
2.7.1.1 the annual reports on Form 10-K for its fiscal years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and all amendments thereto;
2.7.1.2 the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarters
ending March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997 and September 30, 1997;
2.7.1.3 its proxy or information statements relating to meetings of,
or actions taken without a meeting by, the shareholders of the Company held
since December 31, 1996; and
2.7.1.4 all of its other reports, statements, schedules and
registration statements filed with the SEC (the "Company SEC Reports")
since December 31, 1996 (as such reports and documents have been
supplemented or amended since the time of their filing).
2.7.2 As of their respective dates, the Company SEC Reports complied in
all material respects with all applicable requirements of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the respective rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, as the case may be, each in effect on the dates such Company SEC
Reports were filed. As of their respective dates, each of the Company SEC
Reports did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any
6
<PAGE> 64
material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
2.7.3 The Company has filed all required material reports, proxy
statements and registration statements with the SEC and under any Company Gaming
Laws since December 31, 1995.
2.8 Financial Statements.
The audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included in
its annual reports on Form 10-K referred to in Section 2.7.1 and the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements (including in each case the notes
thereto) included in the Company SEC Reports (collectively, the "Company
Financial Statements") were prepared in accordance with the books and records of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, fairly present (subject, in the case of the
unaudited interim financial statements, to normal, recurring year-end audit
adjustments (which are not expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company)), the consolidated financial position of
the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and their
consolidated results of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
periods then ended and were prepared in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles applied on a consistent basis ("GAAP") (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto and except with respect to unaudited statements
as permitted by Form 10-Q of the SEC) and comply as to form in all material
respects with the published rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to such
statements. For purposes of this Agreement, "Balance Sheet" means the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 1997 set forth in
the Company's 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1997 and "Balance
Sheet Date" means September 30, 1997.
2.9 Disclosure Documents.
2.9.1 The Proxy Statement of the Company (as amended and supplemented from
time to time, the "Proxy Statement") to be filed with the SEC in connection with
the Merger, and any amendments or supplements thereto will, when filed, comply
as to form in all material respects with the applicable requirements of the
Exchange Act.
2.9.2 None of the information supplied or to be supplied by the Company in
writing for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Proxy Statement will,
(i) at the time the Proxy Statement is filed with the SEC, (ii) at the date of
mailing to shareholders and (iii) at the times of the meeting of Company's
shareholders to be held in connection with the Merger, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading,
except that no representation is made by the Company in this Section 2.9 with
respect to information supplied in writing by or on behalf of Buyer or any of
its Subsidiaries for inclusion in such documents or information incorporated by
reference therein from documents filed by Buyer or any of its Subsidiaries with
the SEC.
2.10 Absence of Certain Changes.
Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports filed and publicly available
prior to the date hereof, or in Schedule 2.10 hereto, since the Balance Sheet
Date, the Company and Subsidiaries have conducted their business in the ordinary
course consistent with past practice and there has not been:
2.10.1 any Material Adverse Change (as defined herein) or any event,
occurrence or development of a state of circumstances or facts which alone or
together with another fact could reasonably be expected to result in a Material
Adverse Change. As used in this Agreement, with respect to any person, "Material
Adverse Change" means any material adverse change in the business, assets,
financial condition or results of operations of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries which would have a Material Adverse Effect;
2.10.2 any declaration, setting aside or payment of any dividend or other
distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock of the Company or any
repurchase, redemption or other acquisition by the Company or
7
<PAGE> 65
any Subsidiary of the Company of any outstanding shares of capital stock or
other securities of, or other ownership interests in, the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company;
2.10.3 any amendment of any material term of any outstanding security of
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company;
2.10.4 any incurrence, assumption or guarantee by the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company of any indebtedness in excess of $1,000,000, other
than in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and on terms consistent
with past practices;
2.10.5 any creation or assumption by the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company of any material Lien on any material asset other than in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices;
2.10.6 any making of any loan, advance or capital contributions to or
investment in excess of $500,000 in any person, other than loans, advances or
capital contributions to or investments in wholly-owned Subsidiaries made in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices;
2.10.7 any damage, destruction or other casualty loss (other than damage,
destruction or loss that is covered by insurance) affecting the business or
assets of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company which, individually or in
the aggregate, has had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company;
2.10.8 any change in any method of accounting or accounting practice by
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, except for any such change
required by reason of a concurrent change in generally accepted accounting
principles;
2.10.9 any (i) grant of any severance or termination pay to any director,
officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, (ii)
entering into of any employment, deferred compensation or other similar
agreement (or any amendment to any such existing agreement) with any director,
officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, (iii) any
increase in benefits payable under any existing severance or termination pay
policies or employment agreements, or (iv) any increase in compensation, bonus
or other benefits payable to directors, officers or employees of the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company, other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice; or
2.10.10 any labor dispute, other than routine individual grievances, or
any activity or proceeding by a labor union or representative thereof to
organize any employees of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, which
employees were not subject to a collective bargaining agreement at the Balance
Sheet Date, or any lockouts, strikes, slowdowns, work stoppages or threats
thereof by or with respect to such employees which, individually or in the
aggregate, has had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company.
2.11 Licenses and Compliance.
The Company and each of its Subsidiaries and each of their respective
directors, officers, gaming managers and other key employees possess all
licenses (including gaming licenses issued pursuant to the Mississippi
Authorities, the Louisiana Authorities and the Argentina Authorities), permits,
authorizations, approvals, findings of suitability, franchises, and orders
("Company Permits") of any Governmental or Regulatory Authority which are
necessary for the Company to engage in the business of owning and operating the
casino facilities and the businesses and operations owned and operated by the
Company and such Subsidiary, each of which is in full force and effect in all
material respects, except such permits, licenses, variances, exemptions, orders
and approvals which the failure to hold, individually or in the aggregate, is
not having and could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries are in
compliance with the terms of the Company Permits, and all other Federal, state,
local or foreign statutes, rules, regulations, findings of suitability, license,
registration or other authorization, including any condition or limitation
thereon (including any Federal, foreign or state laws relating to currency
transactions), except failures to so comply which, individually or in the
aggregate, are not having and could not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Except as
8
<PAGE> 66
disclosed in the Company SEC Reports filed prior to the date of this Agreement,
the Company and any of its Subsidiaries are not in violation of or default under
any law, regulation or order of any Governmental or Regulatory Authority, except
for such violations or defaults which, individually or in the aggregate, do not
and could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company. To the best knowledge of the Company, no event has occurred which
permits, or upon the giving of notice or passage of time or both would permit,
revocation, non-renewal, modification, suspension or termination of any Company
Permit that currently is in effect the loss of which either individually or in
the aggregate would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company. As used in this Agreement, "best knowledge of the Company" shall
mean the actual knowledge of Marlin Torguson, James E. Ernst, Jay Osman, Robert
Callaway, Gerald Compton, Joseph Billheimer, Jeffrey Dahl or Juris Basins. To
the best knowledge of the Company, the Company and its Subsidiaries and each of
their respective directors, officers, gaming managers and other key employees
are in compliance with the terms of the Company Permits, except for such
failures to comply, which singly or in the aggregate, would not, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. No
investigation or review by any Governmental or Regulatory Authority with respect
to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is pending, or, to the best knowledge
of the Company, threatened, nor has any governmental entity indicated to the
Company an intention to conduct the same, other than those the outcome of which
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Except as disclosed in this Section
2.11, to the best knowledge of the Company, neither the Company nor any
Subsidiary nor any director, officer, gaming manager or key employee of the
Company or any Subsidiary has received any written claim, demand, notice,
complaint, court order or administrative order from any governmental entity in
the past three years, asserting that a license of it or them, as applicable,
under any Company Gaming Laws, should be revoked or suspended except such
revocations or suspensions as could not be reasonably expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries knows of any facts, which, if known to the regulators under the
Company Gaming Laws, could reasonably be expected to result in the revocation or
suspension of a license of its or them, or of any officer, directors, gaming
manager, or key employee under any Company Gaming Laws or would be reasonably
expected to disqualify it or them from licensing under the Company Gaming Laws,
except such revocations, suspensions or disqualifications as could not be
reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has suffered a suspension or revocation
of any material license held under the Company Gaming Laws.
2.12 No Undisclosed Liabilities.
There are no liabilities of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company of
any nature (whether accrued, contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or
otherwise) that would be required by generally accepted accounting principles to
be reflected on a consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its consolidated
Subsidiaries or in the notes thereto, other than:
2.12.1 liabilities disclosed or provided for in the Company SEC Reports
filed and publicly available prior to the date hereof or in the Balance Sheet or
in the notes thereto;
2.12.2 liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice since the Balance Sheet Date, or which in the aggregate could
not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company; and
2.12.3 liabilities under this Agreement.
2.13 Litigation and Administrative Matters.
Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports filed prior to the date of
this Agreement or as set forth in Schedule 2.13 hereto:
2.13.1 There is no action, suit or proceeding pending or, to the best
knowledge of the Company, threatened against, relating to or affecting, nor are
there any Governmental or Regulatory Authority investigations or audits pending
or threatened to the knowledge of the Company, against, relating to or
affecting, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (or any director, officer,
gaming manager, or key employee)
9
<PAGE> 67
or any of their respective assets or properties before any court or governmental
agency, authority or body or arbitrator (nor to the best knowledge of the
Company is there any reasonable basis for any such proceeding, claim, action or
investigation) which, individually or in the aggregate, could be reasonably
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company or its ability to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; and
2.13.2 Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company (nor any
director, officer, gaming manager or key employee) is subject to any order,
judgment or decree of any Governmental or Regulatory Authority which,
individually or in the aggregate, is having or could reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
2.14 Taxes.
Except as set forth in Schedule 2.14 hereto:
2.14.1 the Company and its Subsidiaries have timely filed, been included
in or sent, and will, prior to the Closing, timely file, be included in or send
all returns, declarations and reports and information returns and statements
required to be filed or sent by or relating to any of them prior to the Closing
relating to any Taxes (as defined below) with respect to any income, properties
or operations of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company prior to the
Closing (collectively, the "Returns");
2.14.2 as of the time of filing, the Returns:
2.14.2.1 correctly reflected (and, as to any Returns not filed as of
the date hereof, will correctly reflect) the facts regarding the income,
business, assets, operations, activities and status of the Company and its
Subsidiaries and any other information required to be shown therein;
2.14.2.2 constitute (and, as to any Returns not filed as of the date
hereof, will constitute) complete and accurate representations of the Tax
liabilities for the periods covered; and
2.14.2.3 accurately set forth all items (to the extent required to be
included or reflected in the Returns) relevant to future Tax liabilities,
including the Tax bases of properties and assets;
2.14.3 the Company and its Subsidiaries have timely paid or made provision
for all Taxes that have been shown as due and payable on the Returns that have
been filed;
2.14.4 the Company and its Subsidiaries have made or will make provision
for all Taxes payable for any periods that end before the Closing for which no
Returns have yet been filed and for any periods that begin before the Closing
and end after the Closing to the extent such Taxes are attributable to the
portion of any such period ending at the Closing;
2.14.5 the charges, accruals and reserves for Taxes reflected on the
Company Financial Statements are adequate to cover the Tax liabilities accruing
or payable by the Company and its Subsidiaries in respect of periods prior to
the date of the Company Financial Statements;
2.14.6 neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company is delinquent
in the payment of any Taxes or has requested any extension of time within which
to file or send any Return, which Return has not since been filed or sent;
2.14.7 no deficiency for any Taxes has been asserted or assessed against
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company (or any member of any affiliated or
combined group of which the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company is or has
been a member for which either the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company
could be liable for which the Company has not provided adequate reserves in
accordance with GAAP;
2.14.8 neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company has granted
any extension of the limitation period applicable to any Tax claims and neither
the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company has waived any such limitation
period;
10
<PAGE> 68
2.14.9 neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company is or has
been a party to any tax sharing agreement with any corporation which, as of the
Closing, is not a member of the affiliated group of which the Company is a
member;
2.14.10 neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company has made any
election under Section 341(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code");
2.14.11 the Company has not, for the 5-year period preceding the Closing,
been a United States real property holding corporation within the meaning of
Section 897(c)(2) of the Code;
2.14.12 no Tax is required to be withheld pursuant to Section 1445 of the
Code as a result of the transactions contemplated in this Agreement;
2.14.13 neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has made any disclosure
under Section 6662 of the Code (or under any comparable provision of state law);
and
2.14.14 "Tax" (and with the corresponding meaning "Taxes" and "Taxable")
shall include (i) any net income, gross income, gross receipts, sales, use, ad
valorem, franchise, profits, license, withholding, payroll, employment, excise,
severance, stamp, occupation, premium, property or windfall profit tax, custom
duty or other tax, governmental fee or other like assessment or charge of any
kind whatsoever, together with any interest and any penalty, addition to tax or
additional amount imposed by any taxing authority (domestic or foreign) and (ii)
any liability for the payment of any amount of the type described in clause (i)
as a result of being a member of an affiliated or combined group.
2.15 ERISA.
2.15.1 Schedule 2.15 lists all employee welfare benefit plans and all
employee pension benefit plans within the meaning of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA") maintained, contributed or
required to be contributed to by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company,
any similar employment, severance or other arrangement or policy of the Company
or any Subsidiary (whether written or oral) providing for insurance coverage
(including self-insured arrangements), worker's compensation, disability
benefits, supplemental unemployment benefits, vacation benefits or retirement
benefits, or for profit sharing, deferred compensation, bonuses, stock options,
stock appreciation or other forms of incentive compensation or post-retirement
insurance, compensation or benefits (a "Plan"). No trust funds are maintained or
required to be maintained in connection with any Plan which is not an employee
pension benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA. There are no Plans which Buyer
or the Surviving Corporation will not be able to terminate within a reasonable
period of time after the Closing Date (except as such termination may be
prohibited by Section 401(k)(10) of the Code) in accordance with their terms and
ERISA. The Company has delivered or made available to Buyer true and complete
copies of: (i) each of the Plans and any related funding agreements thereto
(including insurance contracts) including all amendments, all of which are
legally valid and binding and in full force and effect and there are no defaults
thereunder, (ii) the currently effective Summary Plan Description pertaining to
each of the Plans, (iii) the most recent annual report on a form of the 5500
Series for each of the Plans (including all relevant schedules), and (iv) as to
each such Plan that is funded, the Company has delivered or made available to
Buyer a true, correct and complete copy of the most recent annual financial
report with respect to such plan, and any subsequent interim report. Each such
financial report and interim report is a materially accurate description of the
financial status of the subject Plan, and there have been no Material Adverse
Changes in the financial status of any such Plan since the date of the most
recent report provided with respect thereto.
2.15.2 Schedule 2.15 specifically identifies each Plan which is
represented to be a qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Code. With
respect to each Plan so identified, the following are true: (i) to the knowledge
of the Company, the plan, in form and operation, currently satisfies, and for
all years subsequent to the establishment of such plan has satisfied, the
qualification requirements of Section 401(a) or 403(a) of the Code, as
applicable; and (ii) except as identified on Schedule 2.15, the Internal Revenue
Service (the "IRS") has issued a favorable letter of determination with respect
to the Plan as amended to date, and all amendments required by the Code as a
condition of retention of such qualified status as of the date hereof have been
or will
11
<PAGE> 69
be adopted within time limits required to maintain such status. To the knowledge
of the Company, each plan is and has been operating in compliance with its
terms, ERISA and all amendments required by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and
subsequent legislation and regulations, except for such failures to comply
which, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. The Company has delivered or will
deliver a true, correct and complete copy of all letters of determination with
respect to all such Plans as amended to date. No event has occurred which could
subject any Plan to tax under Section 511 of the Code. Each Plan intended to
meet the requirements for tax-favored treatment under Sections 79, 104, 105,
106, 125 and 129 of Subchapter B of Chapter 1 of the Code meets such
requirements.
2.15.3 The Company and each of its Subsidiaries do not now maintain,
contribute to, or been required to contribute to, and is not required to
contribute to, nor, except as set forth on Schedule 2.15 have any of them at any
time maintained, contributed to, or been required to contribute to any Plan
which is subject to Title IV of ERISA. Except as set forth in Schedule 2.15, all
contributions payable to any Plan for any plan year ending prior to the date
hereof have been paid in full on a timely basis or reserves adequate for such
contributions or other payments have been or will be reflected in the applicable
financial statements of the Company, and no accumulated funding deficiency (as
defined in Section 302(a)(2) of ERISA) has been incurred.
2.15.4 No event has occurred, and there exists no condition or set of
circumstances in connection with any Plan of the Company, under which the
Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, directly or indirectly (through any
indemnification agreement or otherwise), could reasonably be expected to be
subject to any risk of material liability under Section 409 of ERISA, Section
502(i) of ERISA, Section 502(l) of ERISA, Title IV of ERISA or Section 4975 of
the Code.
2.15.5 To the knowledge of the Company, the Company and each of its
Subsidiaries have (i) filed or caused to be filed each and every return, report,
statement, notice, declaration and other document required to be filed by any
governmental agency, federal, state and local (including, without limitation,
the IRS, the United States Department of Labor, the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation) with respect to each Plan sponsored or maintained by the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company, and the Company delivered or made available to
Buyer all records with respect to such plans as are required for their proper
administration and proper continued reporting and disclosure; and (ii) complied
with all applicable participant disclosure requirements of ERISA, except for
such failures to comply with (i) and (ii) hereof, which, individually or in the
aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company.
2.15.6 Except in connection with their Subsidiaries, the Company and each
of its Subsidiaries is not and has never been a member of a controlled group of
corporations, an unincorporated trade or business under common control, or a
member of an affiliated service group (as such terms are defined in Sections
414(b), 414(c) and 414(m) of the Code), involving any other entity.
2.15.7 Except as described in Schedule 2.15, there are no "leased
employees" (as defined in Section 414(n) of the Code) who performed services for
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, nor are there any persons who are
anticipated to become leased employees before the Effective Time.
2.15.8 Except as described on Schedule 2.15, the Company and its
Subsidiaries do not maintain any Plan providing medical, health or insurance
benefits to former employees other than health coverage mandated by Section
4980B of the Code. Except as described on Schedule 2.15, there is no contract,
agreement or benefit arrangement covering any employee of the Company, which,
individually or collectively, could give rise to the payment of any amount which
would constitute an "excess parachute payment" (as defined in Section 280G of
the Code). Except as described on Schedule 2.15, the execution and performance
of this Agreement will not (i) result in any obligation or liability (with
respect to accrued benefits or otherwise) of the Company, Buyer or the Surviving
Corporation to any Plan or to any present or former employee of the Company,
(ii) be a trigger event under any Plan that will result in any payment (whether
of severance pay or otherwise) becoming due to any present or former employee,
officer, director, shareholder, contractor, or consultant, or any of their
dependents, or (iii) accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or increase the
amount, or any compensation due to any employee, officer, director, shareholder,
contractor, or
12
<PAGE> 70
consultant of the Company. The Company has not announced, seriously
contemplated, or made any commitment to making any amendment of any existing
Plan or any creation of any new Plan which would result in a binding obligation
of the Company.
2.15.9 To the knowledge of the Company, the Company and its Subsidiaries
have complied in all material respects with the "COBRA" requirements of Section
4980B of the Code, except for such failures to comply which, individually or in
the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company.
2.15.10 Other than routine claims for benefits under the Plans, there are
no pending, or to the best knowledge of the Company, threatened, investigations,
proceedings, claims, lawsuits, disputes, actions, audits or controversies
involving the Plans, or the fiduciaries, administrators, or trustees of any of
the Plans or the Company or any Subsidiary as the employer or sponsor under any
Plan, with any of the IRS, the Department of Labor, the Pension Benefit
Guarantee Corporation, any participant in or beneficiary of any Plan, or any
other person whomsoever. The Company knows of no reasonable basis for any such
claim, lawsuit, dispute, action or controversy.
2.16 Material Contracts.
2.16.1 Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports filed prior to the
date hereof or in Schedule 2.16, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
is a party on the date of this Agreement to any oral or written (i) agreement,
contract, indenture or other instrument relating to Indebtedness in an amount
exceeding $500,000, (ii) other contract, agreement or commitment to be performed
after the date hereof which would be a material contract (as defined in Item
601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K of the Commission), or (iii) contract, agreement,
or commitment which materially restricts the conduct of any line of business by
the Company.
2.16.2 Except as disclosed in Schedule 2.16, neither the Company nor any
of its Subsidiaries is a party on the date hereof to any oral or written
agreement which, by its terms, directly obligates any parent (i.e., any entity
owning more than 50% of the Company's voting securities) of the Company with
respect to any of the Company's obligations under such agreement (it being
understood that a "successors and assigns" provision in any such agreement shall
not be deemed to be such a term).
2.16.3 Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports filed prior to the
date hereof or in Schedule 2.16 hereto, all agreements, contracts, plans,
leases, arrangements and commitments disclosed or required to be disclosed in
the Company's SEC filings referred to in Section 2.7 (the "Material Contracts"),
including the Debt Instruments, are valid and binding agreements of the Company
or a Subsidiary, are in full force and effect, and neither the Company, any
Subsidiary of the Company, nor, to the knowledge of the Company, any other party
thereto is in breach or violation of, or in default in the performance of any
term or provision and no event has occurred which, with notice or lapse of time
or both could be reasonably expected to result in a default under (i) the
certificate of incorporation or bylaws (or other comparable charter documents)
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (ii) any Material Contract, except,
in the case of clause (ii), such breaches, violations and defaults that,
individually or in the aggregate, are not having and could not be reasonably
expected to have Material Adverse Effect on the Company or any Subsidiary.
2.17 Insurance Coverage.
2.17.1 The Company and its Subsidiaries have obtained and, as of the date
of this Agreement, maintain in full force and effect insurance policies, which
are of the type and in amounts customarily carried by persons conducting
businesses similar to those of the Company and its Subsidiaries in the locations
in which the Company and its Subsidiaries conduct their respective businesses.
2.17.2 The Company has furnished to Buyer a list of, and true and complete
copies of, all insurance policies and fidelity bonds covering the assets,
business, equipment, properties, operations, employees, officers and directors
of the Company and its Subsidiaries. Except as set forth on Schedule 2.17.2,
there is no claim by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company pending under
any of such policies or bonds as to which
13
<PAGE> 71
coverage has been questioned, denied or disputed by the underwriters of such
policies or bonds, except such claims that, individually and in the aggregate,
are not having and could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company. All premiums payable under all such policies and bonds
have been paid by the Company and its Subsidiaries. The Company does not know of
any threatened termination of, or premium increase with respect to, any of such
policies or bonds, except such terminations or premium increases that,
individually and in the aggregate could not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Except as set forth on Schedule 2.17.2,
the Company does not know of any pending or threatened uninsured claims which
individually or in the aggregate could be reasonably expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company.
2.18 Finders' Fees.
Except for Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc. and Furman Selz LLC whose fees
(which have been disclosed to Buyer separately in writing) will be paid by the
Company, there is no investment banker, broker, finder or other intermediary
which has been retained by or is authorized to act on behalf, of the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company who might be entitled to any fee or commission
from Buyer or the Company or any of their respective affiliates upon
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
2.19 Employees.
As of the date of this Agreement, except as set forth in Schedule 2.19
hereto or as otherwise provided in this Agreement:
2.19.1 the Company and each of its Subsidiaries have paid in full, or
fully accrued for in the Financial Statements, all wages, salaries, commissions,
bonuses, severance payments, vacation payments, holiday pay, sick pay, pay in
lieu of compensatory time and other compensation due or to become due to all
current and former employees of the Company and each of its Subsidiaries for all
services performed by any of them; and all withholding required with regard to
employees has been properly withheld and transmitted to the appropriate entity.
2.19.2 (a) except for requirements to give notice of termination of
employment at least 30 days prior to such date of termination, upon the
Effective Time and the date of termination of the employment of any employees of
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, none of the Company, any
Subsidiary of the Company, Buyer nor the Merger Subsidiary will be liable to
such employee for "severance pay" or similar payment in excess of an amount
equal to three months salary for such employee, (b) those employees entitled to
severance in the event of termination, the circumstances requiring the payment
of severance pay and the amount of such severance are listed in Schedule
2.19(a);
2.19.3 to the knowledge of the Company, the Company and its Subsidiaries
are in material compliance with all federal, state, local and foreign laws,
rules and regulations relating to the employment of labor, including without
limitation, laws, rules and regulations relating to payment of wages, employment
and employment practices, terms and conditions of employment, hours,
immigration, discrimination, child labor, occupational health and safety,
collective bargaining and the payment and withholding of Taxes and other sums
required by governmental authorities, except such violations of such laws, rules
and regulations as are not having and could not, individually or in the
aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company;
2.19.4 there is no unfair labor practice charge pending or, to the best
knowledge of the Company, threatened against the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company before the National Labor Relations Board or any other federal,
state or local agency or department, except such charges as are not having and
could not, individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company;
2.19.5 in the immediately preceding two years there have not been and
there are no labor strike, dispute, slowdown, sympathy strike, lockout or other
form of work stoppages pending, to the knowledge of the Company, against or
involving the Company or Subsidiary and there have not been in the immediately
14
<PAGE> 72
preceding two years and there is currently no recognitional picketing at any of
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company's locations, or outstanding demand
by any labor organization for representation;
2.19.6 no grievance or any arbitration proceeding arising out of or under
collective bargaining agreements is pending or, to the best knowledge of the
Company, threatened against the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company except
such proceedings as are not having and could not, individually or in the
aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company;
2.19.7 no collective bargaining agreement is currently being negotiated by
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or due to expire within six (6)
months of the Effective Date;
2.19.8 as of the date hereof, no executive officer or general manager of
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or group of such employees has
given notice to the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company of his or her
intent to terminate his or her employment;
2.19.9 as of the date hereof, there are no employment agreements in
effect, or contemplated, with regard to any employees of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company; and
2.19.10 all employees of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company are
employed "at will."
2.20 Other Information.
The documents and information delivered to Buyer in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement together with this Agreement and the
schedules and exhibits hereto and the Company's SEC Documents, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein not
misleading with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole.
2.21 Environmental Matters.
Except as disclosed on Schedule 2.21, or with respect to facts,
circumstances or conditions that, to the Company's knowledge, could not
reasonably be expected to result in costs or expenses exceeding $1,000,000 in
the aggregate:
2.21.1 the Company and its Subsidiaries are conducting and have conducted
their respective businesses and operations in compliance with all applicable
Environmental Laws (as herein defined) and pursuant to all necessary government
permits. There is no Environmental Claim (as herein defined) pending or
threatened, against the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or with respect
to any of their respective current or former properties or assets;
2.21.2 there are no circumstances, events or incidents, including, without
limitation, the presence, release, emission, discharge, storage, generation,
treatment or disposal of any Hazardous Substance (as herein defined), that could
form the basis of any valid Environmental Claim against the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company with respect to any current or former parcel of real
property owned by or leased to the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company
(collectively, the "Real Property"). No Real Property, or other real property or
previously owned or leased by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, is
listed or proposed for listing, as sites requiring investigation or clean-up;
2.21.3 her the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company has transported
or arranged for the transportation (directly or indirectly) of any Hazardous
Substance to any location which is listed or proposed for listing under CERCLA
or any other similar Environmental Law, or which is the subject of docketed
federal, state, local or foreign enforcement actions or other investigation
which could reasonably be expected to lead to claims against the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company for clean-up costs, remedial work, damages to natural
resources or for personal injury claims;
2.21.4 there have been no environmental audits, reports or reviews
conducted by or which are in the possession of the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company in relation to the Real Property, and there have been no
administrative or consent orders of any kind to which the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company
15
<PAGE> 73
is or has been a party, in relation to any property or facility now or
previously owned or leased by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company which
have not been delivered to Buyer prior to the date hereof;
2.21.5 no Hazardous Substance has been generated, treated, stored,
released, disposed or otherwise placed or located on or deposited in the Real
Property or any real property previously owned, leased or used by the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company during or prior to the ownership, or during the
lease or use, of such real property by the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company in an amount which could reasonably be expected to require cleanup or
other remedial action under Environmental Laws;
2.21.6 no above-ground or underground tanks are or have ever been located
under, in or about the Real Property or any real property previously owned,
leased or used by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, which tanks were
located on such real property during or prior to the ownership, lease or use of
such real property by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company; and
2.21.7 no Real Property or any real property previously owned, leased or
used by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company is listed or is proposed
for listing, on the National Priorities List promulgated pursuant to CERCLA, or
any other similar Environmental Laws.
2.21.8 The following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
2.21.8.1 "Affiliate", as applied to any Person, shall mean any other
Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common
control with that Person, except for entities controlled by any directors
of such Person, which entities are otherwise unaffiliated with or unrelated
to such Person.
2.21.8.2 "Environmental Claim", as applied to any Person, shall mean
any notice alleging liability (including, without limitation, liability for
investigatory costs, clean-up costs, monitoring costs, governmental
response costs, natural resources damages, property damages, liability for
nuisance or damage to property values, personal injuries or penalties)
arising out of, based on or resulting from: (a) noncompliance with
Environmental Laws by such Person, or by any of its respective employees or
agents, or (b) the presence or release into the environment of any
Hazardous Substance, or both.
2.21.8.3 "Environmental Laws" shall mean all applicable Federal,
state, local, foreign or other statutes, laws, regulations, ordinances,
rules, orders, consent decrees, judicial or administrative decisions,
agreements or directives having the force of law, issued or enacted
relating to: (a) pollution or protection of the environment, including
natural resources; (b) exposure of any individual, including employees of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, to any Hazardous Substance or other
products, materials or chemicals; (c) protection of human health or welfare
from the effects of products, by-products, wastes, emissions, discharges or
releases of chemical or other substances from industrial or commercial
activities; (d) regulation of the manufacture, use or introduction into
commerce of substances, including, without limitation, use of or rights
with respect to their manufacture, formulation, packaging, labeling,
distribution, transportation, handling, storage and disposal; and (e)
regulation generally of the use of the environment, including, without
limitation, ambient air, surface water, ground water, and surface or
subsurface strata. For purposes of this definition, the term "Environmental
Laws" shall include, without limitation, the following statutes: (a) the
Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. sec.sec. 7401 et seq.; (b) the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. sec.sec. 1251 et seq.;
(c) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, 42
U.S.C. sec.sec. 6901 et seq. ("RCRA"); (d) the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
sec.sec. 9601 et seq., ("CERCLA"); (e) the Toxic Substances Control Act, as
amended, 15 U.S.C. sec.sec. 2601 et seq.; (f) the Occupational Safety and
Health Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. sec. 651; (g) the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. sec.sec. 801 et seq.
("Right-to-Know-Act"); (h) the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as
amended, 30 U.S.C. sec.sec. 801 et seq.; (i) the Safe Drinking Water Act,
42 U.S.C. sec.sec. 3008 et seq.; and (j) all applicable United States,
state, local and foreign laws, statutes, rules, regulations, judgments,
orders, decrees, stipulations or charges.
2.21.8.4 "Hazardous Substance" shall mean: (a) any "hazardous
substance" as defined in CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. sec. 9601(14); (b) any
"pollutant or contaminant" as defined in CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. sec. 9601(33);
(c) any "hazardous waste" as defined in RCRA, 42 U.S.C. sec. 6903(5); (d)
any
16
<PAGE> 74
asbestos, dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls, uranium, radioactive isotopes
and other nuclear by-products, toxic substances or petroleum products,
by-products or derivatives; and (e) any other substance, material or waste,
whether liquid, solid or gas, that is, or could reasonably be expected to
have, a significant adverse effect upon human health of the property of
third parties regulated pursuant to or under any Environmental Law.
2.21.8.5 "Person" shall mean any individual, corporation,
partnership, firm, joint venture, association, joint stock company, trust,
unincorporated organization, governmental or regulatory body or other
entity.
2.22 Indebtedness to and from Officers, Directors and Shareholders.
Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports or Schedule 2.22 hereto, to
the knowledge of the Company, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the
Company is indebted, directly or indirectly, to any person who is an officer,
director or shareholder of any of the foregoing or any affiliate of any such
person in any amount whatsoever, other than for salaries or bonuses for services
rendered or reimbursable business expenses incurred in the ordinary course of
business, nor is any such officer, director, shareholder or affiliate indebted
to the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company except for advances made to
employees of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice to meet reimbursable business expenses
anticipated to be incurred by such obligor.
2.23 Vote Required.
The affirmative vote of the holders of the majority of the outstanding
Magic Shares entitled to vote thereon is the only vote of the holders of any
class or series of the Company's capital stock necessary to approve this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.
2.24 Intellectual Property Rights. Except as set forth in Schedule 2.24,
the Company and its Subsidiaries have all right, title and interest in, or a
valid and binding license to use, all Intellectual Property (as defined below)
individually or in the aggregate material to the conduct of the businesses of
the Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole, except for such failures to
have right, title, interest in or license as could not be reasonably expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Except as set forth in Schedule
2.24, to the knowledge of the Company neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of
the Company is in default (or with the giving of notice or lapse of time or
both, would be in default) under any license to use such Intellectual Property,
such Intellectual Property is not being infringed by any third party, and
neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company is infringing any
Intellectual Property of any third party, except for such defaults and
infringements which, individually or in the aggregate, are not having and could
not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company and
its Subsidiaries taken as a whole. For purposes of this Agreement, "Intellectual
Property" means patents and patent rights, trademarks and trademark rights,
trade names and trade name rights, service marks and service mark rights,
service names and service name rights, copyrights and copyright rights and other
proprietary intellectual property rights and all pending applications for and
registrations of any of the foregoing.
2.25 Takeover Provisions Inapplicable. As of the date hereof and at all
times on or prior to the Effective Date, the restrictions of Sections 302A.671
of the Minnesota Law are, and shall be, inapplicable to the Merger and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Prior to the execution and approval
of this Agreement, (i) the Board of Directors of the Company appointed a
committee of one under Section 302A.673 Subd. 1(d) of the Minnesota Law (the
"Committee"), (ii) the Committee reviewed the proposed business combination set
forth in this Agreement, a proposed agreement between Marlin F. Torguson and
Buyer whereby Marlin F. Torguson would agree to vote his shares in favor of the
proposed merger (the "Agreement to Vote"), and a proposed proxy to be granted by
Marlin F. Torguson to Buyer in connection therewith (the "Proxy") and (iii) the
Committee, following such review, approved the Merger, the Agreement to Vote and
the Proxy. The Company has not, and will not prior to the Effective Date, take
any action which would cause the restrictions of Section 302A.673 of the
Minnesota Law to become applicable to the Merger.
17
<PAGE> 75
2.26 Fairness Opinion. The Company has received the written opinions of
Wasserstein Perella & Co. and Furman Selz LLC financial advisors to the Company,
dated the date hereof, to the effect that the consideration to be received by
the Company's stockholders is fair to the stockholders of the Company from a
financial point of view.
2.27 No Excess Parachute Payments. To the best knowledge of the Company,
no amount that could be received (whether in cash or property or the vesting of
property) as a result of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
by any employee, officer or director of the Company or any of its affiliates who
is a "disqualified individual" (as such term is defined in proposed Treasury
Regulation Section 1.280G-1) under any employment, severance or termination
agreement, other compensation arrangement or Plan currently in effect
constitutes an "excess parachute payment" (as such term is defined in Section
280G(b)(1) of the Code and the proposed regulations thereunder).
2.28 Real Property.
2.28.1 Schedule 2.28 of the Company Disclosure Schedule identifies all
real property owned by the Company and its Subsidiaries (the "Company Owned
Property") and all real property leased by the Company and its Subsidiaries (the
"Company Leased Property"). The Company Owned Property and Company Leased
Property shall be referred to collectively as the "Company Real Property."
2.28.2 The Company and its Subsidiaries have good and marketable title to
the Company Owned Property, and a leasehold estate in the Company Leased
Property, and their interests in the Company Real Property are held free and
clear of any and all liens, encumbrances, restrictions, leases, options to
purchase, option to lease, conditions, covenants, assessments, defects, claims
or exceptions (an "Encumbrance"); except in each case for (i) the Encumbrances
described on Schedule 2.28, (ii) liens for current taxes not yet due and payable
or being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings or (iii) such liens,
encumbrances, restrictions, leases, options to purchase, options to lease,
conditions, covenants, assessments, defects, claims or exceptions as are set
forth in the Company Financial Statements or that could not reasonably be
expected to, either individually or in the aggregate, materially impair the
current use, occupancy, value, financeability or marketability of title of the
Company Real Property subject thereto or as would not be reasonably expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company (the exceptions set forth in
subsections (i), (ii) and (iii) above are collectively referred to herein as the
"Permitted Encumbrances").
2.28.3 True and correct copies of the documents under which the Company
Leased Property is leased (the "Lease Documents"), as set forth in Schedule
2.28, have been delivered to Buyer. The Lease Documents are unmodified and in
full force and effect. There are no other agreements, written or oral, between
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any third parties claiming an
interest in the Company Real Property other than the Permitted Encumbrances.
Neither the Company, any of its Subsidiaries nor, to the best knowledge of the
Company, any other party is in default under the Lease Documents which defaults
would, either individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect
on the Company, and, to the best knowledge of the Company, no defaults which
would, either individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect
on the Company (whether or not subsequently cured) by the Company, any of its
Subsidiaries nor any other party have been alleged under the Lease Documents.
2.28.4 Except as disclosed in Schedule 2.28, to the best knowledge of the
Company, (i) the Company Real Property complies with, and is operated in
accordance with, all applicable laws affecting the Company Real Property or the
ownership, improvement, development, possession, use, occupancy or operation
thereof, and with any and all liens, encumbrances, agreements, covenants,
conditions and restrictions (collectively "Restrictions") affecting the Company
Real Property, except where the failure to comply with such laws or
Restrictions, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected
to result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company; (ii) there are no
material defects in the physical condition of the Company Real Property or the
improvements located on the Company Real Property, except for defects which,
individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company; and (iii) neither the Company nor any
Subsidiary of the Company has received any notice from any Governmental or
Regulatory Authority (a) requiring it to make any material repairs or changes to
the Company Real
18
<PAGE> 76
Property or the improvements located on the Company Real Property or (b) giving
notice of any material governmental actions against the Company, except for such
repairs, changes or actions which, individually or in the aggregate, could not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
2.28.5 Except as disclosed in Schedule 2.28 or for such matters as could
not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company as
of the date of this Agreement, to the best knowledge of the Company, there is no
action, proceeding or litigation pending, contemplated or threatened: (i) to
take all or any portion of the Company Real Property, or any interest therein,
by eminent domain; (ii) to modify the zoning of, or other governmental rules or
restrictions applicable to, the Company Real Property or the use of development
thereof; (iii) for any street widening or changes in highway or traffic lanes or
patterns in the immediate vicinity of the Company Real Property; or (iv)
otherwise relating to the Company Real Property or the interests of the Company
and its Subsidiaries therein, or which otherwise would interfere with the use,
ownership, improvement, development and/or operation of the Company Real
Property.
2.28.6 The Company Real Property is connected to and serviced by adequate
water, sewage disposal, gas and electricity facilities and material systems
(heating, air conditioning, electrical, plumbing and the like) for the basic
operation of the Company Real Property in its current use and such systems are
operable and in good condition (ordinary wear and tear excepted) except for such
lack of service, connection or failures to be operable or in good condition as
could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company.
2.28.7 Except for contracts or obligations entered into the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices or such sales transfers or
exchanges as could not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect
on the Company, there are no contracts or other obligations outstanding for the
sale, exchange or transfer of any of the Company Real Property, or any portion
of it, or the business operated thereon, except as disclosed on Schedule 2.28 of
the Company Disclosure Schedule.
2.29 Title to Assets, Liens. To the best knowledge of the Company, each of
the Company and each of its Subsidiaries has sufficiently good and valid title
to, or an adequate leasehold interest in, its material tangible personal
properties and assets in order to allow it to conduct, and continue to conduct,
its business as currently conducted. Such material tangible personal assets and
properties are sufficiently free of liens to allow each of the Company and each
of its Subsidiaries to conduct, and continue to conduct, its business as
currently conducted, except such liens as could not be reasonably expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, and, to the knowledge of the
Company, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
will not alter or impair such ability in any respect which individually or in
the aggregate would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company.
3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER AND MERGER SUBSIDIARY
Buyer and Merger Subsidiary represent and warrant to the Company that:
3.1 Corporate Existence and Power.
Each of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary is a corporation duly incorporated,
validly existing and in active status under the laws of the State of Delaware,
and has all corporate powers and authority required to carry on its business as
now conducted. Buyer is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation
and is in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the character of the
property owned or leased by it or the nature of its activities makes such
qualification necessary, except for those jurisdictions in which the failure to
be so qualified, individually or in the aggregate, are not and could not be
reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Buyer. Merger
Subsidiary was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, has engaged in no other business activities and
has conducted its operations only as contemplated hereby. Each of Buyer and
Merger Subsidiary has heretofore delivered to the Company true and complete
copies of each of its respective articles of incorporation and bylaws as
currently in effect.
19
<PAGE> 77
3.2 Corporate Authorization.
The execution, delivery and performance by Buyer and Merger Subsidiary of
this Agreement and the consummation by Buyer and Merger Subsidiary of the
transactions contemplated hereby are within the corporate powers of Buyer and
Merger Subsidiary and have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate
action on the part of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary. This Agreement has been duly
and validly executed by Buyer and Merger Subsidiary and constitutes a valid and
binding agreement of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary enforceable in accordance with
its terms.
3.3 Governmental Authorization.
The execution, delivery and performance by Buyer and Merger Subsidiary of
this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby by
Buyer and Merger Subsidiary require no action by or in respect of, or filing
with, any governmental body, agency, official or authority, other than such
consents, approvals, actions, filings and notices which the failure to make or
obtain could not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Buyer and Merger Subsidiary or on the ability of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and:
3.3.1 the filing of articles of merger in accordance with the applicable
laws of the state of Delaware and the filing of appropriate documents with
relevant authorities of other states in which Merger Subsidiary is qualified to
do business;
3.3.2 compliance with any applicable requirements of the HSR Act;
3.3.3 compliance with any applicable requirements of the Exchange Act;
3.3.4 compliance with any applicable requirements of the Nevada Gaming
Control Board and the Nevada Gaming Commission (the "Nevada Authorities") and
the Louisiana Authorities, the Mississippi Authorities and the Argentina
Authorities and the rules and regulations promulgated under each of the
foregoing (the "Buyer Gaming Laws").
3.4 Non-Contravention.
The execution, delivery and performance by Buyer and Merger Subsidiary of
this Agreement and the consummation by Buyer and Merger Subsidiary of the
transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not:
3.4.1 contravene or conflict with the articles of incorporation or bylaws
of Buyer or Merger Subsidiary;
3.4.2 subject to obtaining the consents and approvals described in Section
3.3, contravene or conflict with or constitute a violation of any provision of
any law, regulation, judgment, injunction, order or decree of any Governmental
or Regulatory Authority binding upon or applicable to Buyer, Merger Subsidiary
or any other Subsidiary of Buyer, except such contraventions, conflicts and
violations which could not, individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Buyer or its ability to consummate
the transactions contemplated hereby;
3.4.3 subject to obtaining the consents and approvals described in Section
3.3, constitute a default under or give rise to a right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration of any right or material obligation of Buyer and
Merger Subsidiary or to a loss of any material benefit to which Buyer and Merger
Subsidiary is entitled under any provision of any agreement, contract or other
instrument binding upon Buyer and Merger Subsidiary or any license, franchise,
permit or other similar authorization held by Buyer and Merger Subsidiary,
except such defaults, terminations, cancellations or accelerations which could
not, individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on Buyer or its ability to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby; or
3.4.4 subject to obtaining the consents and approvals described in Section
3.3, result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of Buyer and
Merger Subsidiary, except such Liens which could not, individually or in the
aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Buyer or
its ability to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
20
<PAGE> 78
3.5 Licenses.
The Buyer and each of its Subsidiaries and each of their respective
directors, officers, gaming managers and other key employees possess all
licenses (including gaming licenses issued pursuant to the Mississippi
Authorities, the Louisiana Authorities and the Nevada Authorities), permits,
authorizations, approvals, findings of suitability, franchises, and orders
("Buyer Permits") of any Governmental or Regulatory Authority which are
necessary for the Buyer to engage in the business of owning and operating the
casino facilities and the businesses and operations owned and operated by the
Buyer and such Subsidiary, each of which is in full force and effect in all
material respects, except such permits, licenses, variances, exemptions, orders
and approvals which the failure to hold, individually or in the aggregate, is
not having and could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Buyer. The Buyer and each of its Subsidiaries are in compliance
with the terms of the Buyer Permits, and all other Federal, state, local or
foreign statutes, rules, regulations, findings of suitability, license,
registration or other authorization, including any condition or limitation
thereon (including any Federal, foreign or state laws relating to currency
transactions), except failures to so comply which, individually or in the
aggregate, are not having and could not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Buyer. Except as disclosed in the annual reports
on Form 10-K with respect to the year ended December 31, 1996 and the quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997
and September 30, 1997 (the "Buyer SEC Reports") filed prior to the date of this
Agreement, neither the Buyer nor any of its Subsidiaries are in violation of or
default under any law, regulation or order of any Governmental or Regulatory
Authority, except for such violations or defaults which, individually or in the
aggregate, do not and could not reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Buyer. To the best knowledge of the Buyer, no event has
occurred which permits, or upon the giving of notice or passage of time or both
would permit, revocation, non-renewal, modification, suspension or termination
of any Buyer Permit that currently is in effect the loss of which either
individually or in the aggregate would reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Buyer. To the best knowledge of the Buyer, the Buyer and
its Subsidiaries and each of their respective directors, officers, gaming
managers and other key employees are in compliance with the terms of the Buyer
Permits, except for such failures to comply, which singly or in the aggregate,
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Buyer. No investigation or review by any
Governmental or Regulatory Authority with respect to the Buyer or any of its
Subsidiaries is pending, or, to the best knowledge of the Buyer, threatened, nor
has any governmental entity indicated to the Buyer an intention to conduct the
same, other than those the outcome of which would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Buyer. Except as disclosed in this Section 3.5, to the best knowledge of the
Buyer, neither the Buyer nor any Subsidiary nor any director, officer, gaming
manager or key employee of the Buyer or any Subsidiary has received any written
claim, demand, notice, complaint, court order or administrative order from any
governmental entity in the past three years, asserting that a license of it or
them, as applicable, under any Buyer Gaming Laws, should be revoked or suspended
except such revocations or suspensions as could not be reasonably expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Buyer. Neither the Buyer nor any of its
Subsidiaries knows of any facts, which, if known to the regulators under the
Buyer Gaming Laws, could reasonably be expected to result in the revocation or
suspension of a license of its or them, or of any officer, directors, gaming
manager, or key employee under any Buyer Gaming Laws or would be reasonably
expected to disqualify it or them from licensing under the Buyer Gaming Laws,
except such revocations, suspensions or disqualifications as could not be
reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Buyer. Neither the
Buyer nor any of its Subsidiaries has suffered a suspension or revocation of any
material license held under the Buyer Gaming Laws that has had or could be
reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Buyer.
3.6 Litigation and Administrative Matters.
Except as disclosed in the Buyer SEC Reports filed prior to the date of
this Agreement, there is no action, suit or proceeding pending or, to the best
knowledge of Buyer, threatened against, relating to or affecting, nor, to the
knowledge of Buyer, are there any Governmental or Regulatory Authority
investigations or audits pending before any court or governmental agency,
authority or body or arbitrator against, relating to or affecting, Buyer or any
of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective assets or properties which,
individually or
21
<PAGE> 79
in the aggregate, could be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect
the ability of Buyer of Merger Subsidiary to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
3.7 Financing
Buyer has sufficient cash on hand or available through credit facilities to
acquire at the Buyer's request all issued and outstanding Magic Shares in
accordance with this Agreement and to make all other necessary payments of fees
and expenses in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
4. COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY
The Company agrees that:
4.1 Conduct of the Company.
From the date hereof until the Effective Time, except with the prior
written consent of Buyer, each of the Company and its Subsidiaries shall conduct
its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and, to the
extent consistent therewith, shall use its best efforts to preserve intact its
business organization and relationships with third parties and to keep available
the services of its present officers and employees. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing and except as contemplated by this Agreement and the
Schedules hereto, from the date hereof until the Effective Time neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries will take any of the following actions,
except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, without
the prior written consent of Buyer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld:
4.1.1 amend its articles of incorporation or bylaws as in force and effect
on the date hereof;
4.1.2 fail to make any scheduled principal or interest payment on
indebtedness evidenced by its Debt Instruments;
4.1.3 issue any capital stock or options, warrants or other rights to
purchase any capital stock or any securities convertible or exchangeable for
shares of such stock or commit to do any of the foregoing, other than the
issuance of Magic Shares upon the exercise of stock options, warrants or
convertible securities outstanding on the date of this Agreement;
4.1.4 in any twelve-month period, borrow more than $5,000,000 or incur,
assume or guarantee any debt for borrowed money in excess of $5,000,000 or
prepay any indebtedness, except in the ordinary course of business; provided
that the Company agrees that it will notify Buyer prior to borrowing more than
$1,000,000 or incurring, assuming or guaranteeing any debt for borrowed money in
excess of $1,000,000 in any twelve-month period;
4.1.5 enter into any employment, deferred compensation or other similar
agreement (or any amendment to any such existing agreement) with any existing or
prospective director, officer, employee or consultant of or to the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company;
4.1.6 except to the extent required by written employment agreements
existing or Company policies in effect on the date of this Agreement, increase
benefits payable under any existing severance or termination pay policies or
employment agreements, nor adopt any new severance or termination policy, not
enter into agreements respecting the foregoing;
4.1.7 increase compensation, bonus or other benefits payable to directors,
officers or employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except to the
extent required under the terms of any agreements existing on the date of this
Agreement;
4.1.8 make any loan, advance or capital contribution to or investment in
any person or otherwise pledge the credit of the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company, or mortgage, pledge or subject to any of their respective assets to
any Liens, claims or encumbrances, except for employee advances, sales to
customers on credit or loans, or advances or investments in Subsidiaries of the
Company consistent with past practices and only in the ordinary course of
business;
22
<PAGE> 80
4.1.9 fail to comply in any material respect with any laws, ordinances,
regulations or other governmental restrictions applicable to the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, including, but not limited to, any Environmental Law,
which failure would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company;
4.1.10 declare or pay any dividend or distribution on any share of capital
stock or other securities of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company;
4.1.11 repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any outstanding capital
stock or other securities of, or other ownership interests in the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company;
4.1.12 merge or consolidate with, purchase substantially all or any
substantial part of the assets of, or otherwise acquire any business or any
proprietorship, firm, association, corporation or other business organization or
division thereof except as contemplated hereby, or in connection with the
exercise of fiduciary obligations in accordance with applicable law upon the
consummation of a transaction that is deemed to be a Superior Proposal (as
defined herein);
4.1.13 grant any powers of attorney (other than special powers of attorney
granted in the ordinary course of business);
4.1.14 make, or make any commitments for, capital expenditures except as
set forth in the budget attached hereto as Schedule 4.1 plus an amount in excess
of 10% of the aggregate amount set forth therein, and except, in addition to
such capital expenditures, amounts not to exceed $1,000,000 for any individual
commitment or $5,000,000 for all such commitments taken in the aggregate in any
twelve-month period, without the prior written consent of Buyer, which consent
shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, said written consent
shall not be necessary in the event of a bona-fide emergency wherein the Company
will suffer irreparable harm if it does not make the capital expenditure
immediately, provided, further, however, that the incurrence of such capital
expenditure without consent in excess of the limitations provided herein shall
nonetheless constitute a failure of condition; and provided further that the
Company agrees that it will notify Buyer prior to making any capital expenditure
in excess of $500,000 or aggregate capital expenditures in excess of $1,000,000
in any twelve-month period;
4.1.15 adopt, amend or terminate or propose to adopt, amend or terminate
any welfare plan, retirement plan or benefit arrangements, other than such
adoptions, amendments, or terminations disclosed in this Agreement or a Schedule
to this Agreement or otherwise required by applicable law;
4.1.16 enter into any transaction, commitment, contract or agreement
relating to the disposition of any material portion of its assets or business or
relinquishment of any contract or other right, in either case, material to the
Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole, other than transactions and
commitments in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; or
4.1.17 change any method of accounting or accounting practice by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except for any such change required by
reason of a concurrent change in generally accepted accounting principles.
4.2 Other Offers.
From the date hereof until the termination hereof, the Company and its
Subsidiaries and the officers, directors, employees or other agents of the
Company and its Subsidiaries including, without limitation, its respective
counsel, accountants, investment advisors or other advisors or representatives
("Personnel"), will not, directly or indirectly, (a) take any action to solicit,
initiate or encourage, or take any other action to facilitate, any Acquisition
Proposal (as hereinafter defined) or (b) discuss or engage in negotiations with,
or disclose any non-public information relating to the Company or any Subsidiary
of the Company or afford access to the properties, books or records of the
Company or any Subsidiary of the Company to, any Person that may be considering
making, or has made, an Acquisition Proposal or (c) agree to approve, recommend
or enter into any agreement regarding, an Acquisition Proposal unless, in each
of (a) through (c), all of the following events have occurred: (1) the Company
has received an unsolicited, written, bona fide Acquisition
23
<PAGE> 81
Proposal from a third party; (2) the Company's Board of Directors shall conclude
in good faith, after consultation with its legal and financial advisers, that
such Acquisition Proposal, after taking into account whether it is reasonably
likely to be financeable, is superior from a financial point of view to the
terms of the transaction set forth in this Agreement; and (3) the Company's
Board of Directors shall have determined, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel, that the failure to take such action in respect of such
Acquisition Proposal would result in a substantial risk of liability for a
breach of fiduciary duties of the members of the Company's Board of Directors
under applicable law (a "Superior Proposal"). The Company will promptly notify
Buyer after receipt of any Acquisition Proposal, including a Superior Proposal,
or any indication that any person is considering making an Acquisition Proposal,
including a Superior Proposal, or any request for non-public information
relating to the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or for access to the
properties, books or records of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company by
any Person that may be considering making, or has made, an Acquisition Proposal,
including a Superior Proposal, (including the terms thereof and the identity of
the third party) and will keep Buyer fully informed of the status and details of
any such Acquisition Proposal, including a Superior Proposal, indication or
request including furnishing Buyer a copy of any such Acquisition Proposal,
including a Superior Proposal, indication or request. The term "Acquisition
Proposal" as used herein means any offer or proposal for, or any indication of
interest in, a tender offer or a merger or other business combination involving
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or the acquisition of any equity
interest in, or a substantial portion of the assets of, the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, other than the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
4.3 Shareholder Meeting.
The Company shall call a meeting of its shareholders to be held as promptly
as practicable for the purpose of voting upon the approval of this Agreement.
Unless the Company receives a Superior Proposal, the Company will, through its
board of directors, recommend to its shareholders approval of such matters and
shall not withdraw, modify or change its recommendation in a manner adverse to
Buyer.
5. COVENANTS OF BUYER
Buyer agrees that:
5.1 Obligations of Merger Subsidiary.
Buyer will take all action necessary to cause Merger Subsidiary to perform
its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the Merger on the terms
and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
5.2 Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance.
5.2.1 Except to the extent required by law, until the fifth anniversary of
the Effective Time, neither Buyer nor the Surviving Corporation will take any
action so as to amend, modify or repeal the provisions for indemnification of
directors, officers, employees or agents contained in the certificates or
articles of incorporation or bylaws (or other comparable charter documents) of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries as of the date of this Agreement in such
a manner as would adversely affect the rights of any individual who shall have
served as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time (each an "Indemnified Party") to be
indemnified by the Company or its Subsidiaries or the Surviving Corporation in
respect of their serving in such capacities prior to the Effective Time.
5.2.2 Buyer shall, until the second anniversary of the Effective Time,
cause the Surviving Corporation to maintain in effect, to the extent available,
the policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance maintained by the
Company and its Subsidiaries as of the date hereof (or policies of at least the
same coverage and amounts containing terms that are no less advantageous to the
insured parties) with respect to claims arising from facts or events that
occurred on or prior to the Effective Time.
5.2.3 In the event the Surviving Corporation (i) consolidates with or
merges into any other person and shall not be the continuing or surviving
corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers all or
substantially all of its properties and assets to any person, then, and in each
such case, proper provision
24
<PAGE> 82
shall be made so that the successors and assigns of the Company shall assume the
obligations set forth in Sections 5.2.1 and 5.2.2.
5.2.4 The provisions of this Section 5.2 are intended to be for the
benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, each party entitled to insurance
coverage under Section 5.2.2 above, respectively, and his or her heirs and legal
representatives, and shall be in addition to any other rights such party may
have under the certificate or articles of incorporation or bylaws of the
Surviving Corporation or any of its Subsidiaries, under Minnesota Law or
otherwise.
5.3 Employee Benefit Plans.
For a period of no less than twelve months following the Closing Date,
Buyer shall provide each employee of the Surviving Corporation or its
Subsidiaries with benefits that are at least substantially equivalent in the
aggregate to those provided under the Plans in effect on the Closing Date,
provided, that Buyer, in providing such substantially equivalent benefits, shall
not be required to provide or maintain any particular Plan or benefit which was
provided to or maintained for such employee prior to the Closing. Buyer agrees
that, for purposes of all employee benefit plans (including, but not limited to,
all "employee benefit plans" within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA, all
deferred compensation arrangements, all policies and employee fringe benefit
programs, vacation policies, etc.) of Buyer (such plans, programs, policies and
arrangements, the "Buyer Plans") in which such employees may participate
following the Closing under which an employee's eligibility or benefits depends,
in whole or in part, on length of service, credit will be given to the employees
of the Surviving Corporation for service previously credited with the Company
prior to the Closing, provided that such crediting of service shall not be given
for benefit accrual purposes under any Buyer Plan. Such employees shall also be
given credit for any deductible or copayment amounts paid in respect of a plan
year in which the Closing Date occurs. Buyer shall also cause each Buyer Plan to
waive (a) any preexisting condition restrictions or (b) any waiting period
limitations for all employees of the Surviving Corporation or its Subsidiaries
hired or employed as of the Closing Date.
5.4 Employee Matters.
Buyer agrees to cause the Surviving Corporation to employ for a period of
six months following the Effective Date each employee of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries who is employed by the Company or its Subsidiaries in one or
more of the positions listed on Schedule 5.4 attached hereto at the Effective
Time and to provide such employee at least the same compensation during such
six-month period as the Company provided such employee at the Effective Time. In
the event that Buyer or the Surviving Corporation terminates the employment of
any such employee prior to the expiration of such six-month period for any
reason other than "for cause," Buyer will, or will cause the Surviving
Corporation to, pay severance to such employee in an amount equal to the
compensation that such employee would have received if he had been employed for
the remainder of such six-month period at the level of compensation paid to such
employee at the Effective Time. As used herein, "for cause" shall mean (a) the
material failure of an employee to perform the duties commensurate with such
employee's position and assigned to such employee by his supervisor, (b)
habitual intoxication or inexcusable, repeated or prolonged absence from work,
(c) perpetration by the employee of a fraud against the Surviving Corporation or
Buyer, (d) commission of a felony by the employee or (e) the loss or suspension
of a license or finding of suitability from any Governmental or Regulatory
Authority.
6. COVENANTS OF BUYER, MERGER SUBSIDIARY AND THE COMPANY
The parties hereto agree that:
6.1 Best Efforts.
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, each party will use
its best efforts promptly to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do,
or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable
laws and regulations to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
25
<PAGE> 83
6.2 Certain Filings.
The Company and Buyer and Merger Subsidiary shall (a) cooperate with one
another as soon as practicable in determining whether any action by or in
respect of, or filing with, any governmental body, agency or official, or
authority is required (including, without limitation, any filing requirements
under the HSR Act), or any actions, consents, approvals or waivers are required
to be obtained from parties to any material contracts, in connection with the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and (b) in
seeking any such actions, consents, approvals or waivers or making any such
filings, promptly take all actions necessary to make filings required by the
Company, Merger Subsidiary and Buyer or their affiliates with all applicable
Governmental and Regulatory Authorities and third parties furnishing at the
earliest practicable date information required in connection therewith and seek
to obtain all such actions, consents, approvals or waivers.
6.3 Public Announcements.
Each of the parties hereto agree that all press releases and other
announcements, whether written or oral, to be made by any of them with respect
to the Merger shall be subject to mutual agreement and consent prior to the
dissemination thereof; provided, however, either party may make any
announcements required by applicable law, New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ
Stock Market rules so long as the party so required notifies the other party
promptly upon learning such requirement and in good faith attempts to comply
with this Section.
6.4 Further Assurances.
At and after the Effective Time, the officers and directors of the
Surviving Corporation will be authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and
on behalf of the Company or Merger Subsidiary, any deeds, bills of sale,
assignments or assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of the
Company or Merger Subsidiary, any other actions and things to vest, perfect or
confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving Corporation any and all right,
title and interest in, to and under any of the rights, properties or assets of
the Company acquired or to be acquired by the Surviving Corporation as a result
of, or in connection with, the Merger.
6.5 Preparation of Proxy Statement.
The Company shall promptly prepare and file with the SEC the Proxy
Statement and shall use its best efforts to have such statement reviewed by the
SEC and distributed to shareholders of the Company as soon as practicable after
such filing. Buyer and Merger Subsidiary shall, cooperate with the Company in
the preparation of the Proxy Statement and provide the Company with such
information as the Company reasonably requests for preparation of and inclusion
in the Proxy Statement.
6.6 Access to Information.
From the date hereof until the Effective Time, each of the Company and
Buyer will give the other party (for purposes of this Section 6.6, the
"requesting party") and the requesting party's counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized representatives full access during business hours
and upon reasonable notice to its offices, properties, books and records and the
offices, properties, books and records of its Subsidiaries, will furnish to the
requesting party and the requesting party's counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized representatives such financial and operating data
and other information as such persons may reasonably request and will instruct
the its employees, counsel and financial advisors to cooperate with the
requesting party in the requesting party's investigation of the business of the
other party and the business of the other party's Subsidiaries; provided that no
investigation pursuant to this Section shall affect any representation or
warranty given hereunder by the any party hereto to any other party hereto. Any
such information or material obtained pursuant to this Section 6.6 that
constitutes Evaluation Materials (as such term is defined in the letter
agreement dated as of March 20, 1997, between Company and Buyer (the
"Confidentiality Agreement")) shall be governed by the terms of the
Confidentiality Agreement.
26
<PAGE> 84
6.7 Notices of Certain Events.
Each party hereto shall promptly notify the other of:
6.7.1 any material notice or other communication from any person alleging
that the consent of such Person is or may be required in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
6.7.2 any material notice or other communication to or from any
Governmental or Regulatory Authority in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement; and
6.7.3 any actions, suits, claims, investigations or proceedings commenced
or, to the best of its knowledge threatened against, relating to or involving or
otherwise affecting such party or any Subsidiary of such party which, if pending
on the date of this Agreement, would have been required to have been disclosed
pursuant to Section 2.13 or Section 3.6, as appropriate, or which relate to the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
7. CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
7.1 Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.
The obligations of the Company, Buyer and Merger Subsidiary to consummate
the Merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
7.1.1 any applicable waiting period (and any extension thereof) under the
HSR Act relating to the Merger shall have expired;
7.1.2 no provision of any applicable law or regulation and no judgment,
injunction, order or decree shall prevent or prohibit the consummation of the
Merger, except for any such law, regulation, injunction, order or decree of the
Argentina Authorities that prevents or prohibits the consummation of the Merger
because of the condition of or actions by Buyer or Merger Subsidiary;
7.1.3 other than the filing of the Certificate of Merger, (i) all
approvals, consents, waivers, and filings with and notices to any Governmental
or Regulatory Authority to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, the
failure of which to be obtained or taken could be reasonably expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on Buyer and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or on
the ability of Buyer and the Company to consummate transactions, (except such
consents or approvals as may be required to be obtained from the Argentina
Authorities in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby as a result
of the condition of or actions by Buyer or Merger Subsidiary), and (ii) all
approvals, consents, waivers, filings and notices listed on Schedule 7.1.3
hereto shall have been obtained (and each party hereto shall have received
copies thereof) without the imposition of any conditions which are not
reasonably satisfactory to Buyer or the Company; such approvals, consents and
waivers shall be in effect and no proceeding shall have been initiated or
threatened with respect thereto; all applicable waiting periods with respect to
such approvals, consents and waivers shall have expired; all conditions and
requirements prescribed by law or by such approvals, consents and waivers shall
have been satisfied; and any approvals, consents and waivers shall not impose
regulatory conditions under decisions or interpretations in effect as of the
date of this Agreement which would jeopardize the gaming licenses presently
issued to the Company or its Subsidiaries by the Mississippi Gaming Commission,
the Louisiana Control Board or the Argentina Authorities or any of the gaming
licenses issued to Buyer or its Subsidiaries by the Nevada Control Board or
jeopardize any of the contracts by and between the Company or the Buyer with any
of the foregoing in a manner that would be reasonably expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company or Buyer, respectively, except such
regulatory conditions as may be imposed by the Argentina Authorities as a result
of the condition of or actions by Buyer or Merger Subsidiary;
7.1.4 this Agreement shall have been approved and adopted by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding
Magic Shares;
7.1.5 no court, arbitrator or governmental body, agency or official shall
have issued any order, and there shall not be any statute, rule or regulation,
restraining or prohibiting the consummation of the Merger or the effective
operation of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries or the Buyer and
its Subsidiaries after
27
<PAGE> 85
the Effective Time, and no proceeding challenging this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby or seeking to prohibit, alter, prevent or
materially delay the Merger shall have been instituted by any person before any
court, arbitrator or governmental body, agency or official and be pending;
7.2 Conditions to the Obligations of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary.
The obligations of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary to consummate the Merger are
subject to the satisfaction of the following further conditions:
7.2.1 except, in the case of representations and warranties, for any
matters that individually or in the aggregate could not reasonably be expected
to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, the Company shall have
performed in all material respects all of its obligations hereunder required to
be performed by it at or prior to the Effective Time, the representations and
warranties of the Company contained in this Agreement and in any certificate or
other writing delivered by the Company pursuant hereto shall be true in all
material respects at and as of the Effective Time as if made at and as of such
time, or in the case of representations and warranties made as of a specified
date earlier than the Closing Date, on or as of such earlier date, and Buyer
shall have received a certificate signed by the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company attesting to the matters set forth in
this Section 7.2.1;
7.2.2 Buyer shall have received all documents it may reasonably request
relating to the existence of the Company and its Subsidiaries and the authority
of the Company for this Agreement, all in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Buyer;
7.2.3 Buyer shall have been furnished at the Closing with the opinions of
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, special counsel to the Company, and Frommelt &
Eide, Ltd., counsel to the Company, each dated the Closing Date, addressed to
Buyer in a form reasonably acceptable to Buyer;
7.2.4 there shall not have occurred between the date hereof and the
Effective Time any Material Adverse Change in the consolidated results of
operations, financial condition, assets, liabilities (whether absolute, accrued,
contingent or otherwise), or business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, which Material Adverse Change has not been adequately reserved for
in the Company Financial Statements;
7.2.5 holders of no more than 10% of the issued and outstanding Magic
Shares shall have made the demands and given the notices required under
Minnesota Law to assert dissenters' appraisal rights;
7.2.6 Buyer shall have received all regulatory approval for the Merger and
the transactions contemplated thereby from the Mississippi Gaming Commission,
the Louisiana Gaming Control Board, the Argentina Authorities and Nevada
Authorities, except for such consents and approvals as may be required to be
obtained from the Argentina Authorities in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby as a result of the condition of or actions by Buyer or
Merger Subsidiary; and
7.2.7 if requested by Buyer, the Effective Time shall occur on or after
October 15, 1998.
7.3 Conditions to Obligations of the Company.
The obligations of the Company to consummate the Merger are subject to the
satisfaction of the following further conditions:
7.3.1 Each of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary shall have performed in all
material respects all of its respective obligations hereunder required to be
performed by it at or prior to the Effective Time, the representations and
warranties of Buyer and Merger Subsidiary contained in this Agreement and in any
certificate or other writing delivered by the Company pursuant hereto shall be
true in all material respects at and as of the Effective Time as if made at and
as of such time, or, in the case of representations and warranties made as of a
specified date earlier than the Closing Date, on or as of such earlier date and
the Company shall have received a certificate signed by the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Buyer attesting to the matters set forth
in this Section 7.3.1;
28
<PAGE> 86
7.3.2 The Company shall have received all documents it may reasonably
request relating to the existence of Buyer and its subsidiaries and the
authority of Buyer for this Agreement, all in form and substance satisfactory to
the Company; and
7.3.3 The Company shall have been furnished at the Closing with an opinion
of Irell & Manella LLP, counsel to Buyer, dated the Closing Date, addressed to
the Company in a form reasonably acceptable to the Company.
8. TERMINATION
8.1 Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any
time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding any approval of this Agreement
by the shareholders of the Company):
8.1.1 by mutual written consent of the parties hereto duly authorized by
action taken by or on behalf of their respective boards of directors; or
8.1.2 by either the Company or Buyer, if the Merger has not been
consummated by October 31, 1998 (subject to Section 8.1.11) and the failure to
consummate the Merger is not caused by a breach of this Agreement by the
terminating party; or
8.1.3 at the election of the Company if any one or more of the conditions
to the obligation of the Company to close as set forth in Section 7.1 or 7.3 has
not been fulfilled as of October 31, 1998 (subject to Section 8.1.11); or
8.1.4 at the election of Buyer if any one or more of the conditions to the
obligation of Buyer to close as set forth in Section 7.1 or 7.2 has not been
fulfilled as of October 31, 1998 (subject to Section 8.1.11); or
8.1.5 at the election of the Company if Buyer or Merger Subsidiary has
breached in any material respect any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement contained in this Agreement, which breach cannot be or is not cured
within thirty (30) days following receipt by Buyer or Merger Subsidiary of
written notice of such breach; or
8.1.6 at the election of Buyer if the Company has breached in any material
respect any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement contained in this
Agreement (so long as, in the case of representations and warranties, such
breach relates to matters that could reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect), which breach cannot be or is not cured within thirty (30) days
following receipt of the Company of written notice of such breach; or
8.1.7 by either the Company or Buyer, if there shall be any law or
regulation that makes consummation of the Merger illegal or otherwise prohibited
or if any judgment, injunction, order or decree enjoining Buyer or the Company
from consummating the Merger is entered and such judgment, injunction, order or
decree shall become final and nonappealable, except for such laws, regulations,
judgments, injunctions, orders or decrees of the Argentina Authorities that
render the consummation of the Merger illegal or otherwise prohibited or
enjoined because of the condition of or actions by Buyer or Merger Subsidiary;
or
8.1.8 by the Company or Buyer if the shareholders of the Company have not
approved the Merger on or before October 31, 1998; or
8.1.9 by the Company if (i) the Company shall receive a Superior Proposal,
(ii) the Company has given Buyer at least five business days notice of the
Superior Proposal and the determination of the Board of Directors pursuant to
this section, and (iii) the Company shall not have received a proposal from
Buyer believed by the Board of Directors of the Company, upon consultation with
financial advisors and counsel, to be the equivalent of or superior to the
Superior Proposal; or
8.1.10 by Buyer, if the Company's Board of Directors shall have withdrawn
or modified in a manner adverse to Buyer its approval or recommendation of this
Agreement or the Merger or shall have approved or recommended an Acquisition
Proposal.
29
<PAGE> 87
8.1.11 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in clauses
8.1.2, 8.1.3 or 8.1.4, the termination date provided in such clauses shall
automatically be extended to March 31, 1999 (and neither party shall have rights
of termination under such clauses until such date) so long as the parties are
proceeding in good faith to effectuate the consummation of the Merger and the
sole unsatisfied condition as of October 31, 1998 is receipt of regulatory
consents and approvals required to consummate the Merger.
8.2 Effect of Termination.
If this Agreement is terminated and the transactions contemplated hereby
are not consummated pursuant to Section 8.1, this Agreement shall become void
and of no further force and effect, except for the provisions of Section 6.6
hereof relating to confidentiality and the provisions of Section 6.3, 8.2 and
9.4. Except as provided in Section 9.4 hereof, if this Agreement is properly
terminated as provided herein, no party to this Agreement shall have any
liability; provided however, that nothing in this Section 8.2 shall relieve any
party from liability hereunder in respect of a termination due to willful breach
of this Agreement by it or willful failure by it to perform its obligations
hereunder.
9. MISCELLANEOUS
9.1 Notices.
Any notice or other communication required or which may be given hereunder
shall be in writing and shall be delivered personally, telegraphed or sent by
facsimile transmission with telephone confirmation, or sent by certified,
registered or express mail, postage prepaid, and shall be deemed given when so
delivered personally, upon receipt if telegraphed or sent by facsimile
transmission, or if mailed, three days after the date of mailing, as follows:
If to Buyer or
Merger Subsidiary:
Hollywood Park, Inc.
1050 South Prairie Avenue
Inglewood, California 90301
Attention: G. Michael Finnigan
Facsimile: (310) 673-2582
With a copy to:
Irell & Manella, LLP
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
Attention: Alvin G. Segel, Esq.
Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
If to Company:
Casino Magic Corp.
711 Casino Magic Drive
Bay St. Louis, Mississippi 39520
Attention: Marlin Torguson
Facsimile: (228) 467-7998
With a copy to:
Frommelt & Eide, Ltd.
580 International Centre
900 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Attention: Roger H. Frommelt, Esq.
Facsimile: (612) 342-2761
and
30
<PAGE> 88
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy
601 South Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Attention: Eric H. Schunk, Esq.
Facsimile: (213) 629-5063
Any party can change notice address, facsimile number or other information
for proposal notice by specifying such change to the parties hereto.
9.2 No Survival of Representations and Warranties.
The representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein
(other than the covenants and agreements set forth in Section 1.7, 1.8, 5.2,
5.3, 5.4 and this Article 9) and in any certificate or other writing delivered
pursuant hereto shall not survive the Effective Time of this Agreement.
9.3 Amendments; No Waivers.
9.3.1 Any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived prior to
the Effective Time if, and only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and
signed, in the case of an amendment, by the Company, Buyer and Merger Subsidiary
or in the case of a waiver, by the party against whom the waiver is to be
effective; provided that after the adoption of this Agreement by the
shareholders of the Company, no such amendment or waiver shall, without the
further approval of such shareholders, alter or change:
9.3.1.1 The amount or kind of consideration to be received in exchange for
any shares of capital stock of the Company; or
9.3.1.2 Any material term of the certificate of incorporation of the
Surviving Corporation.
9.3.2 No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power or
privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or
partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the
exercise of any other right, power or privilege. The rights and remedies herein
provided shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies
provided by law.
9.4 Expenses.
9.4.1 Each of the parties hereto will bear and pay their respective fees
and expenses incurred in connection with the proposed transaction, whether
incurred prior to or after the date hereof, including, without limitation,
accounting, legal, broker, investment banking and appraisal fees.
9.4.2 The Company shall pay Buyer in immediately available funds the sum
of $3,500,000 in the event that this Agreement is terminated, pursuant to
Sections 8.1.6, 8.1.8, 8.1.9 or 8.1.10; provided that in any such event the
payment of such amount shall constitute the sole recourse and remedy of Buyer
and Merger Subsidiary with respect to any breach of a representation, warranty,
covenant, or agreement by the Company. Payment of such funds shall occur within
five business days after such termination of this Agreement.
9.5 Successors and Assigns.
The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns,
provided that no party may assign, delegate or otherwise transfer any of its
rights or obligations under this Agreement without the consent of the other
parties hereto.
9.6 Governing Law.
Except to the extent that the laws of the province of Neuquen, Argentina
and the States of Mississippi, Louisiana, Nevada and Delaware or other sovereign
states or nations are mandatorily applicable to the Merger, this Agreement shall
be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of
Minnesota.
31
<PAGE> 89
9.7 Counterparts; Effectiveness.
This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and
hereto were upon the same instrument. This Agreement shall become effective when
each party hereto shall have received counterparts hereof signed by all of the
other parties hereto.
9.8 Superseding Agreement, Parties in Interest.
This Agreement, the exhibits hereto and the Schedules hereto delivered
pursuant to this Agreement contain the entire agreement between the parties
hereto with respect to the transactions contemplated herein and, except as
provided herein, supersede all previous oral and written and all contemporaneous
oral negotiations, commitments, writings and understandings other than
Confidentiality Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. This
Agreement is not intended to confer upon any other persons any rights or
remedies hereunder, except Section 1.7, 1.8, 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 hereof which shall
inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Indemnified Parties and the
officers, directors, agents and employees of the Company.
9.9 Schedules and Exhibits.
All Schedules and Exhibits attached hereto or referred to herein are hereby
incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement as if set forth in full
herein. An exception to a representation or warranty disclosed in any Schedule
or elsewhere this Agreement shall constitute an exception to all other
representations and warranties made in this Agreement even if such exception is
not included in each such other representation, warranty or applicable Schedule.
9.10 Invalid Provisions.
If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or
unenforceable under any present or future law, and if the rights or obligations
of any party hereto under this Agreement will not be materially and adversely
affected thereby, (i) such provision will be fully severable, (ii) this
Agreement will be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or
unenforceable provision had never comprised a part hereof, (iii) the remaining
provisions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect and will not
be affected by the illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision or by its
severance herefrom and (iv) in lieu of such illegal, invalid or unenforceable
provision, there will be added automatically as a part of this Agreement a
legal, valid and enforceable provision as similar in terms to such illegal,
invalid or unenforceable provision as may be possible.
32
<PAGE> 90
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year
first above written.
HOLLYWOOD PARK, INC.
By /s/ G. MICHAEL FINNIGAN
Name: G. Michael Finnigan
Title: CFO
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
By /s/ MARLIN F. TORGUSON
Name: Marlin F. Torguson
Title: Chairman of the Board
HP ACQUISITION II, INC.
By /s/ G. MICHAEL FINNIGAN
Name: G. Michael Finnigan
Title: CEO & CFO
33
<PAGE> 91
ANNEX C
[Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc. Letterhead]
Wasserstein Perella & Co. Inc.
31 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019-6118
Telephone 212-969-2700
Fax 212-969-7836
February 19, 1998
Board of Directors
Casino Magic! Corp.
711 Casino Magic Drive
Bay St. Louis, MS 39520
Members of the Board:
You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of the common stock, par value $0.01 per
share (the "Shares"), of Casino Magic! Corp. (the "Company") of the $2.27 per
share cash consideration (the "Consideration") to be received by such holders
pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February
19, 1998 (the "Merger Agreement"), among the Company, Hollywood Park, Inc.
("Parent"), and a subsidiary of the Parent ("Sub"). The Merger Agreement
provides for, among other things, a merger of Sub with and into the Company (the
"Merger") pursuant to which each outstanding Share will be converted into the
right to receive the Consideration. The terms and conditions of the Merger are
set forth in more detail in the Merger Agreement.
In connection with rendering our opinion, we have reviewed the Offer to
Purchase and the Merger Agreement and have participated in discussions and
negotiations relating to the Merger on behalf of the Company. We have also
reviewed and analyzed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to the Company for recent years and interim periods to
date, as well as certain internal financial and operating information, including
financial forecasts, analyses and projections prepared by or on behalf of the
Company and provided to us for purposes of our analysis, and we have met with
management of the Company to review and discuss such information and, among
other matters, the Company's business, operations, assets, financial condition,
expansion plans and future prospects. In addition, we have visited each of the
Company's owned and operated facilities in the United States as well as the
facilities of certain competitors in each respective market.
We have reviewed and considered certain financial and stock market data
relating to the Company, and we have compared that data with similar data for
certain other companies, the securities of which are publicly traded, that we
believe may be relevant or comparable in certain respects to the Company or one
or more of its businesses or assets, and we have reviewed and considered the
financial terms of certain recent acquisitions and business combination
transactions in the gaming industry specifically, and in other industries
generally, that we believe to be reasonably comparable to the Merger or
otherwise relevant to our inquiry. We have also performed such other studies,
analyses, and investigations and reviewed such other information as we
considered appropriate for purposes of this opinion.
In our review and analysis and in formulating our opinion, we have assumed
and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all the financial and other
information provided to or discussed with us or publicly available, and we have
not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of any of such
information. We have also relied upon the reasonableness and accuracy of the
financial projections, forecasts and analyses provided to us and we have
assumed, with your consent, that such projections, forecasts and analyses were
reasonably prepared in good faith and on bases reflecting the best currently
available judgments and estimates of the Company's management, and we express no
opinion with respect to such projections, forecasts and analyses or the
assumptions upon which they are based. In addition, we have not reviewed any of
the books
<PAGE> 92
and records of the Company, or for making or obtaining an independent valuation
or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of the Company, and no such
independent valuation or appraisal was provided to us. We have assumed that
transactions described in the Merger Agreement will be consummated on the terms
no less favorable to the Company than as set forth therein. Our opinion is
necessarily based on economic and market conditions and other circumstances as
they exist and can be evaluated by us as of the date hereof. In rendering this
opinion, we are not expressing any opinion as to the price at which the Shares
will actually trade at any time.
As you know, WP&Co. served as lead manager with respect to $115 million of
13% First Mortgage Notes due 2003 with Contingent Interest issued in August 1996
by Casino Magic of Louisiana Corp., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company. In addition, upon consummation of the Merger, we will receive a fee, a
portion of which we received upon our engagement. In the ordinary course of our
business, we may actively trade the debt and equity securities of the Company
and Parent for our own account and for the accounts of customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
Our opinion addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view to
the shareholders of the Company of the Consideration to be received by such
shareholders pursuant to the Merger, and we do not express any views on any
other terms of the Merger. Specifically, our opinion does not address the
Company's underlying business decision to effect the transactions contemplated
by the Merger Agreement. Furthermore, we are not expressing any opinion as to
the fairness of the terms of the Irrevocable Proxy to which certain shareholders
of the Company are to be bound.
It is understood that this letter is for the benefit and use of the Board
of Directors of the Company in its consideration of the Merger and except for
inclusion in its entirety in a proxy statement relating to the Merger, may not
be quoted, used or reproduced for any other purpose without our prior written
consent. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder
with respect to how such holder should vote with respect to the Merger, and
should not be relied upon by any shareholder as such.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, including the various assumptions
and limitations set forth herein, it is our opinion that as of the date hereof,
the Consideration to be received by the shareholders of the Company pursuant to
the Merger is fair to such shareholders from a financial point of view.
Very truly yours,
WASSERSTEIN PERELLA & CO., INC.
<PAGE> 93
ANNEX D
[WASSERSTEIN PERELLA & CO., INC. LETTERHEAD]
Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc.
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2950
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone 310-286-3300
Fax 310-286-7270
August 4, 1998
Board of Directors of
Casino Magic! Corp.
711 Casino Magic Drive
Bay St. Louis, MS 39520
Members of the Board:
You have asked us to confirm whether our opinion to the Board dated
February 19, 1998 (our "Opinion") remains in effect. Capitalized terms used but
not otherwise defined in this letter have the meanings ascribed thereto in the
Opinion.
In providing this confirmation, we have, in addition to the procedures and
analyses described in our Opinion updated to the date hereof, reviewed the
Company's Preliminary Proxy Statement dated August 4, 1998 and considered the
information set forth therein with respect to developments that occurred
following the delivery of our Opinion. For purposes hereof, we assume that the
final form of the Proxy Statement will not differ in any material respect from
the aforementioned draft.
This confirmation is subject to all of the assumptions and limitations as
are set forth in our Opinion. In particular, but without limiting the foregoing,
our Opinion addressed and this confirmation addresses only the fairness from a
financial point of view of the Consideration to be received by the shareholders
of the Company pursuant to the Merger, and we did not and do not render any
opinion as to the fairness to any other persons or of any other transactions.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we hereby confirm that it remains
our opinion that the Consideration to be received by the shareholders of the
Company pursuant to the Merger is fair to such shareholders from a financial
point of view.
Very truly yours,
/s/ WASSERSTEIN PERELLA & CO.,
INC.
WASSERSTEIN PERELLA & CO., INC.
<PAGE> 94
ANNEX E
[FURMAN SELZ LLC Letterhead] Furman Selz LLC
101 California Street, Suite 4300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone 415-834-3600
Fax 415-834-3688
February 19, 1998
Special Independent Committee of
The Board of Directors
Casino Magic Corp.
711 Casino Magic Drive
Bay Saint Louis, MS 39520
Dear Sirs:
We understand that Casino Magic Corp. (the "Company") and Hollywood Park,
Inc. and/or its affiliates (together, the "Acquiror") propose to enter into an
agreement and Plan of Merger ("the Agreement") in accordance with the term sheet
(the "Bid Letter") which was furnished to us on February 13, 1998 and amended on
February 19, 1998, whereby, among other things, the Acquiror will purchase all
of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company. The consideration
("Consideration") to be paid for the Company is $2.27 cash for each outstanding
share of the Company's Common Stock. The proposed transaction (the "Proposed
Transaction") is subject to the approval of the holders of a majority of the
shares of the Common Stock of the Company voting at a special meeting of
stockholders to be called for such purpose.
You have requested our opinion, as investment bankers, as to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to the shareholders of the Company, of the
Consideration to be paid to the shareholders of the Company in the Proposed
Transaction.
In conducting our analysis and arriving at our opinion as described herein,
we have reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the following:
(i) the Bid Letter dated February 13, 1998 and amended on February 19,
1998, and the terms of the Proposed Transaction as set forth therein;
(ii) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended
September 30, 1997 and June 30, 1997;
(iii) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 1996, December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1994;
(iv) certain financial and operating information regarding the business,
operations and prospects of the Company including projections, provided
to us by the management of the Company;
(v) a comparison of the consideration to be paid in the Proposed
Transaction with the historic trading prices for the Common Stock of
the Company and with the premium paid in certain other selected
transactions that we deemed relevant;
(vi) a chronology of certain Company events transpiring since January
1997, the time at which the Company engaged Wasserstein Perella to
pursue strategic alternatives;
(vii) a comparison of the historical and projected financial results and
financial condition of the Company with those of other companies and
businesses that we deemed relevant; and
(viii) the financial terms of other selected transactions that we deemed
relevant.
We considered certain stock market data of the Company and compared that
data with similar data for other publicly held companies in businesses similar
to the Company. In addition, in arriving at our opinion, we
<PAGE> 95
have held discussions with selected members of senior management of the Company
concerning its business, operations, assets, financial conditions and prospects.
We also undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as we deemed
appropriate.
In arriving at our opinion, we have not made, obtained or assumed any
responsibility for any independent evaluation or appraisal of the properties and
facilities or of the assets and liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the
Company. We have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the
financial and other information supplied to or otherwise used by us in arriving
at our opinion and have not attempted independently to verify, or undertaken any
obligation to verify, such information. We have assumed, in accordance with the
Bid Letter, that the Acquiror has adequate resources to pay the Consideration in
cash without qualification or contingencies.
We have further relied upon the assurances of the management of the Company
that they were not aware of any facts that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. In addition, we have assumed that the projections
provided to us by the Company represent the best currently available estimates
and judgment of the Company's management as to the future financial condition
and results of operations of the Company, and have assumed that such projections
have been reasonably prepared based on such currently available estimates and
judgment. We assume no responsibility for and express no view as to such
forecasts and projections of the assumptions on which they are based.
We have assumed that the Agreement will conform to the Bid Letter and will
contain customary representations, warranties and indemnities.
Our opinion addresses the Consideration to be paid to the Company in the
Proposed Transaction. We were not asked to, and did not, participate in any
negotiations with the Acquiror with respect to the Proposed Transaction or
advise management of the Company concerning the structuring or terms of the
Proposed Transaction.
We have also taken into account our assessment of general economic, market
and financial conditions and our experience in similar transactions, as well as
our experience in securities valuation in general. Our opinion is necessarily
based upon conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date hereof.
We do not express any view as to what the value of the Company's Common
Stock will be upon completion of the Proposed Transaction, or the price at which
the Company's Common Stock will trade prior to or subsequent to the closing of
the Proposed Transaction.
As you are aware, we will receive a fee for rendering our opinion. In the
ordinary course of our business, we may trade in the equity securities of the
Company for our own account and for the accounts of our customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
The Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise
out of the rendering of this opinion.
The opinion is for the use and benefit of the Special Independent Committee
of the Board of Directors of the Company in its consideration of the Proposed
Transaction. The information set forth herein is confidential and may not be
copied, summarized, or provided to any other party other than the Independent
Committee with a prior written consent. The opinion is not intended to be and
does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such
stockholder should vote with respect to the Proposed Transaction. The opinion
may be included in its entirety in any proxy statement with respect to the
Proposed Transaction, but it may not be summarized, excerpted from or otherwise
publicly referenced without our written consent.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, as of
the date hereof, the Proposed Transaction is fair to the shareholders of the
Company from a financial point of view.
Very truly yours,
/s/Gregory R. Brundage
FURMAN SELZ LLC
<PAGE> 96
ANNEX F
[ING Baring Furman Selz LLC Letterhead] ING Baring Furman Selz LLC
101 California Street, Suite 4300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone 415-834-3600
Fax 415-834-3688
August 4, 1998
Special Independent Committee of
The Board of Directors
Casino Magic Corp.
711 Casino Magic Drive
Bay Saint Louis, MS 39520
Dear Sirs:
We understand that Casino Magic Corp. (the "Company") and Hollywood Park,
Inc. and/or its affiliates (together, the "Acquiror") entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated February 19, 1998 (the "Agreement"), whereby, among
other things, the Acquiror will purchase all of the outstanding Common Stock of
the Company. The consideration ("Consideration") to be paid for the Company is
$2.27 cash for each outstanding share of the Company's Common Stock. The
proposed transaction (the "Proposed Transaction") is subject to the approval of
the holders of a majority of the shares of the Common Stock of the Company
voting at a special meeting of stockholders to be called for such purpose.
On February 19, 1998, we rendered an opinion, as investment bankers, as to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the shareholders of the
Company, of the Consideration to be paid to the shareholders of the Company in
the Proposed Transaction. You have requested that we confirm such opinion.
In conducting our analysis and confirming our opinion as described herein,
we have reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the following, updated to the
date hereof:
(i) the Agreement, and the terms of the Proposed Transaction as set
forth therein;
(ii) the draft of the Company's Preliminary Proxy Statement dated August
4, 1998;
(iii) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended
June 30, 1998, March 31, 1998, September 30, 1997 and June 30, 1997;
(iv) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 1997, December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995;
(v) certain financial and operating information regarding the business,
operations and prospects of the Company including projections,
provided to us by the management of the Company;
(vi) a comparison of the consideration to be paid in the Proposed
Transaction with the historic trading prices for the Common Stock of
the Company and with the premium paid in certain other selected
transactions that we deemed relevant;
(vii) a chronology of certain Company events transpiring since January
1997, the time at which the Company engaged Wasserstein Perella &
Co., Inc. to pursue strategic alternatives;
(viii) a comparison of the historical and projected financial results and
financial condition of the Company with those of other companies and
businesses that we deemed relevant; and
(ix) the financial terms of other selected transactions that we deemed
relevant.
We considered certain stock market data of the Company through the date
hereof and compared that data with similar data for other publicly held
companies in businesses similar to the Company. In addition, we have held
discussions with selected members of senior management of the Company concerning
its business, operations, assets, financial conditions and prospects. We also
undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as we deemed
appropriate.
<PAGE> 97
Special Independent Committee of
The Board of Directors
Casino Magic Corp.
August 4, 1998
Page 2
We have not made, obtained or assumed any responsibility for any
independent evaluation or appraisal of the properties and facilities or of the
assets and liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company. We have assumed
and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information supplied to or otherwise used by us in arriving at our opinion and
have not attempted independently to verify, or undertaken any obligation to
verify, such information. We have assumed that the Acquiror has adequate
resources to pay the Consideration in cash without qualification or
contingencies.
We have further relied upon the assurances of the management of the Company
that they were not aware of any facts that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. In addition, we have assumed that the projections
provided to us by the Company represent the best currently available estimates
and judgment of the Company's management as to the future financial condition
and results of operations of the Company, and have assumed that such projections
have been reasonably prepared based on such currently available estimates and
judgment. We assume no responsibility for and express no view as to such
forecasts and projections of the assumptions on which they are based.
This confirmation addresses the Consideration to be paid to the Company in
the Proposed Transaction. We were not asked to, and did not, participate in any
negotiations with the Acquiror with respect to the Proposed Transaction or
advise management of the Company concerning the structuring or terms of the
Proposed Transaction.
We have also taken into account our assessment of general economic, market
and financial conditions and our experience in similar transactions, as well as
our experience in securities valuation in general. This confirmation is
necessarily based upon conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date
hereof.
We do not express any view as to what the value of the Company's Common
Stock will be upon completion of the Proposed Transaction, or the price at which
the Company's Common Stock will trade prior to or subsequent to the closing of
the Proposed Transaction.
As you are aware, we will receive a fee for confirming our opinion. In the
ordinary course of our business, we may trade in the equity securities of the
Company for our own account and for the accounts of our customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
The Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise
out of the rendering of this opinion.
This confirmation is for the use and benefit of the Special Independent
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company in its consideration of the
Proposed Transaction. The information set forth herein is confidential and may
not be copied, summarized, or provided to any other party other than the
Independent Committee with a prior written consent. This confirmation is not
intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to
how such stockholder should vote with respect to the Proposed Transaction. This
confirmation may be included in its entirety in any proxy statement with respect
to the Proposed Transaction, but it may not be summarized, excerpted from or
otherwise publicly referenced without our written consent.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we confirm that, as of the date
hereof, it remains our opinion that the Proposed Transaction is fair to the
shareholders of the Company from a financial point of view.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Gregory R. Brundage
ING Baring Furman Selz LLC
<PAGE> 98
ANNEX G
MINNESOTA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
302A.471. RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
SUBDIVISION 1. ACTIONS CREATING RIGHTS. A shareholder of a corporation may
dissent from, and obtain payment for the fair value of the shareholder's shares
in the event of, any of the following corporate actions:
(a) An amendment of the articles that materially and adversely affects the
rights or preferences of the shares of the dissenting shareholder in that it:
(1) alters or abolishes a preferential right of the shares;
(2) creates, alters, or abolishes a right in respect of the redemption
of the shares, including a provision respecting a sinking fund for the
redemption or repurchase of the shares;
(3) alters or abolishes a preemptive right of the holder of the shares
to acquire shares, securities other than shares, or rights to purchase
shares or securities other than shares;
(4) excludes or limits the right of a shareholder to vote on a matter,
or to cumulate votes, except as the right may be excluded or limited
through the authorization or issuance of securities of an existing or new
class or series with similar or different voting rights; except that an
amendment to the articles of an issuing public corporation that provides
that section 302A.671 does not apply to a control share acquisition does
not give rise to the right to obtain payment under this section;
(b) A sale, lease, transfer, or other disposition of all or substantially
all of the property and assets of the corporation, but not including a
transaction permitted without shareholder approval in section 302A.661,
subdivision 1, or a disposition in dissolution described in section 302A.725,
subdivision 2, or a disposition pursuant to an order of a court, or a
disposition for cash on terms requiring that all or substantially all of the net
proceeds of disposition be distributed to the shareholders in accordance with
their respective interests within one year after the date of disposition;
(c) A plan of merger, whether under this chapter or under chapter 322B, to
which the corporation is a party, except as provided in subdivision 3;
(d) A plan of exchange, whether under this chapter or under chapter 322B,
to which the corporation is a party as the corporation whose shares will be
acquired by the acquiring corporation, if the shares of the shareholder are
entitled to be voted on the plan; or
(e) Any other corporate action taken pursuant to a shareholder vote with
respect to which the articles, the bylaws, or a resolution approved by the board
directs that dissenting shareholders may obtain payment for their shares.
SUBD. 2. BENEFICIAL OWNERS. (a) A shareholder shall not assert dissenters'
rights as to less than all of the shares registered in the name of the
shareholder, unless the shareholder dissents with respect to all the shares that
are beneficially owned by another person but registered in the name of the
shareholder and discloses the name and address of each beneficial owner on whose
behalf the shareholder dissents. In that event, the rights of the dissenter
shall be determined as if the shares as to which the shareholder has dissented
and the other shares were registered in the names of different shareholders.
(b) The beneficial owner of shares who is not the shareholder may assert
dissenters' rights with respect to shares held on behalf of the beneficial
owner, and shall be treated as a dissenting shareholder under the terms of this
section and section 302A.473, if the beneficial owner submits to the corporation
at the time of or before the assertion of the rights a written consent of the
shareholder.
<PAGE> 99
SUBD. 3. RIGHTS NOT TO APPLY. (a) Unless the articles, the bylaws, or a
resolution approved by the board otherwise provide, the right to obtain payment
under this section does not apply to a shareholder of the surviving corporation
in a merger, if the shares of the shareholder are not entitled to be voted on
the merger.
(b) If a date is fixed according to section 302A.445, subdivision 1, for
the determination of shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote on
an action described in subdivision 1, only shareholders as of the date fixed,
and beneficial owners as of the date fixed who hold through shareholders, as
provided in subdivision 2, may exercise dissenters' rights.
SUBD. 4. OTHER RIGHTS. The shareholders of a corporation who have a right
under this section to obtain payment for their shares do not have a right at law
or in equity to have a corporate action described in subdivision 1 set aside or
rescinded, except when the corporate action is fraudulent with regard to the
complaining shareholder or the corporation.
302A.473. PROCEDURES FOR ASSERTING DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
SUBDIVISION 1. DEFINITIONS. (a) For purposes of this section, the terms
defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.
(b) "Corporation" means the issuer of the shares held by a dissenter before
the corporate action referred to in section 302A.471, subdivision 1 or the
successor by merger of that issuer.
(c) "Fair value of the shares" means the value of the shares of a
corporation immediately before the effective date of the corporate action
referred to in section 302A.471, subdivision 1.
(d) "Interest" means interest commencing five days after the effective date
of the corporate action referred to in section 302A.471, subdivision 1, up to
and including the date of payment, calculated at the rate provided in section
549.09 for interest on verdicts and judgments.
SUBD. 2. NOTICE OF ACTION. If a corporation calls a shareholder meeting at
which any action described in section 302A.471, subdivision 1 is to be voted
upon, the notice of the meeting shall inform each shareholder of the right to
dissent and shall include a copy of section 302A.471 and this section and a
brief description of the procedure to be followed under these sections.
SUBD. 3. NOTICE OF DISSENT. If the proposed action must be approved by the
shareholders, a shareholder who is entitled to dissent under section 302A.471
and who wishes to exercise dissenters' rights must file with the corporation
before the vote on the proposed action a written notice of intent to demand the
fair value of the shares owned by the shareholder and must not vote the shares
in favor of the proposed action.
SUBD. 4. NOTICE OF PROCEDURE; DEPOSIT OF SHARES. (a) After the proposed
action has been approved by the board and, if necessary, the shareholders, the
corporation shall send to all shareholders who have complied with subdivision 3
and to all shareholders entitled to dissent if no shareholder vote was required,
a notice that contains:
(1) The address to which a demand for payment and certificates of
certificated shares must be sent in order to obtain payment and the date by
which they must be received;
(2) Any restrictions on transfer of uncertificated shares that will
apply after the demand for payment is received;
(3) A form to be used to certify the date on which the shareholder, or
the beneficial owner on whose behalf the shareholder dissents, acquired the
shares or an interest in them and to demand payment; and
(4) A copy of section 302A.471 and this section and a brief
description of the procedures to be followed under these sections.
(b) In order to receive the fair value of the shares, a dissenting
shareholder must demand payment and deposit certificated shares or comply with
any restrictions on transfer of uncertificated shares within 30 days after the
notice required by paragraph (a) was given, but the dissenter retains all other
rights of a shareholder until the proposed action takes effect.
<PAGE> 100
SUBD. 5. PAYMENT; RETURN OF SHARES. (a) After the corporate action takes
effect, or after the corporation receives a valid demand for payment, whichever
is later, the corporation shall remit to each dissenting shareholder who has
complied with subdivisions 3 and 4 the amount the corporation estimates to be
the fair value of the shares, plus interest, accompanied by:
(1) The corporation's closing balance sheet and statement of income
for a fiscal year ending not more than 16 months before the effective date
of the corporate action, together with the latest available interim
financial statements;
(2) An estimate by the corporation of the fair value of the shares and
a brief description of the method used to reach the estimate; and
(3) A copy of section 302A.471 and this section, and a brief
description of the procedure to be followed in demanding supplemental
payment.
(b) The corporation may withhold the remittance described in paragraph (a)
from a person who was not a shareholder on the date the action dissented from
was first announced to the public or who is dissenting on behalf of a person who
was not a beneficial owner on that date. If the dissenter has complied with
subdivisions 3 and 4, the corporation shall forward to the dissenter the
materials described in paragraph (a), a statement of the reason for withholding
the remittance, and an offer to pay to the dissenter the amount listed in the
materials if the dissenter agrees to accept that amount in full satisfaction.
The dissenter may decline the offer and demand payment under subdivision 6.
Failure to do so entitles the dissenter only to the amount offered. If the
dissenter makes demand, subdivisions 7 and 8 apply.
(c) If the corporation fails to remit payment within 60 days of the deposit
of certificates or the imposition of transfer restrictions on uncertificated
shares, it shall return all deposited certificates and cancel all transfer
restrictions. However, the corporation may again give notice under subdivision 4
and require deposit or restrict transfer at a later time.
SUBD. 6. SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT; DEMAND. If a dissenter believes that the
amount remitted under subdivision 5 is less than the fair value of the shares
plus interest, the dissenter may give written notice to the corporation of the
dissenter's own estimate of the fair value of the shares, plus interest, within
30 days after the corporation mails the remittance under subdivision 5, and
demand payment of the difference. Otherwise, a dissenter is entitled only to the
amount remitted by the corporation.
SUBD. 7. PETITION; DETERMINATION. If the corporation receives a demand
under subdivision 6, it shall, within 60 days after receiving the demand, either
pay to the dissenter the amount demanded or agreed to by the dissenter after
discussion with the corporation or file in court a petition requesting that the
court determine the fair value of the shares, plus interest. The petition shall
be filed in the county in which the registered office of the corporation is
located, except that a surviving foreign corporation that receives a demand
relating to the shares of a constituent domestic corporation shall file the
petition in the county in this state in which the last registered office of the
constituent corporation was located. The petition shall name as parties all
dissenters who have demanded payment under subdivision 6 and who have not
reached agreement with the corporation. The corporation shall, after filing the
petition, serve all parties with a summons and copy of the petition under the
rules of civil procedure. Nonresidents of this state may be served by registered
or certified mail or by publication as provided by law. Except as otherwise
provided, the rules of civil procedure apply to this proceeding. The
jurisdiction of the court is plenary and exclusive. The court may appoint
appraisers, with powers and authorities the court deems proper, to receive
evidence on and recommend the amount of the fair value of the shares. The court
shall determine whether the shareholder or shareholders in question have fully
complied with the requirements of this section, and shall determine the fair
value of the shares, taking into account any of all factors the court finds
relevant, computed by any method or combination of methods that the court, in
its discretion, sees fit to use whether or not used by the corporation or by a
dissenter. The fair value of the shares as determined by the court is binding on
all shareholders, wherever located. A dissenter is entitled to judgment in cash
for the amount by which the fair value of the shares as determined by the court,
plus interest, exceeds the amount, if any, remitted under subdivision 5, but
shall not be liable to the
<PAGE> 101
corporation for the amount, if any, by which the amount, if any, remitted to the
dissenter under subdivision 5 exceeds the fair value of the shares as determined
by the court, plus interest.
SUBD. 8. COSTS; FEES; EXPENSES. (a) The court shall determine the costs and
expenses of a proceeding under subdivision 7, including the reasonable expenses
and compensation of any appraisers appointed by the court, and shall assess
those costs and expenses against the corporation, except that the court may
assess part or all of those costs and expenses against a dissenter whose action
in demanding payment under subdivision 6 is found to be arbitrary, vexatious, or
not in good faith.
(b) If the court finds that the corporation has failed to comply
substantially with this section, the court may assess all fees and expenses of
any experts or attorneys as the court deems equitable. These fees and expenses
may also be assessed against a person who has acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or
not in good faith in bringing the proceeding, and may be awarded to a party
injured by those actions.
(c) The court may award, in its discretion, fees and expenses to an
attorney for the dissenters out of the amount awarded to the dissenters, if any.
<PAGE> 102
1998 - PROXY
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND
MANAGEMENT OF CASINO MAGIC CORP.
The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints
Marlin F. Torguson and James E. Ernst or either of them, as proxies,
with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of common stock of
Casino Magic Corp. (the "Company") which the undersigned is entitled
to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Casino Magic Corp.,
to be held on the 9th Floor, Casino Magic Hotel at 195 East Beach
Blvd., Biloxi, Mississippi 39520 on September 9, 1998 at 2:30 p.m., or
at any adjournment thereof, and hereby instructs said proxies to vote
said shares as specified below:
<TABLE>
<S><C>
1. To approve the Merger Agreement dated February 19, 1998 among the Company, Hollywood Park,
Inc. and HP Acquisition II, Inc. and the related Plan of Merger between the Company and HP
Acquisition II, Inc.
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
2. Election of FOR [ ] all nominees listed below WITHHOLD AUTHORITY [ ]
Directors (except as marked to the contrary below). to vote for all nominees listed
below.
(INSTRUCTIONS: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE, STRIKE A LINE THROUGH THE
NOMINEE'S NAME IN THE LIST BELOW.)
Marlin F. Torguson James E. Ernst Roger H. Frommelt E. Thomas Welch
3. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon other business of which the Board
of Directors is presently unaware and which may properly come before the meeting, and for the
election of any person as a member of the Board of Directors if a nominee named in the
accompanying Proxy Statement is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve.
</TABLE>
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
OVER
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
OF CASINO MAGIC CORP.
IF NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN ON PROPOSAL 1, THIS PROXY WILL BE
VOTED IN FAVOR OF PROPOSAL 1 UNLESS THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER HAS
NOTIFIED THE COMPANY OF THE SHAREHOLDER'S DESIRE TO EXERCISE
DISSENTER'S RIGHTS PRIOR TO A VOTE ON PROPOSAL 1. IF NO INSTRUCTIONS
ON PROPOSAL 1 ARE GIVEN, AND IF NOTICE OF THE EXERCISE OF DISSENTERS'
RIGHTS IS PROVIDED, THE PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS AN ABSTENTION ON
PROPOSAL 1.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE ELECTION OF THE FOUR
NOMINEES AND FOR PROPOSAL 3 UNLESS OTHER INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN.
-----------------------------
(Signature)
-----------------------------
(Signature)
Dated: , 1998
----------------
Please sign exactly as your
name appears hereon; if stock
is held jointly, each owner
must sign. When signing as
executor, trustee, guardian,
attorney, agent or proxy,
please indicate title.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN
THIS PROXY PROMPTLY.
<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
X Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1997 or Transition Report pursuant to
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition
period from ___ to ___ Commission File No. 0-20712.
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Minnesota 64-0817483
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)
711 CASINO MAGIC DRIVE, BAY SAINT LOUIS, MS 39520
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (601) 467-9257
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK
(Title of Class)
</TABLE>
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
<PAGE> 2
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K [X]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant was $57,911,544 as of March 25, 1998. As of the close of business
March 25, 1998, there were 35,722,124 shares of the Registrant's common stock
outstanding.
ii
<PAGE> 3
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following documents are incorporated herein by reference:
The discussions under the sections captioned ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,"
"EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION," "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS" and "PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS" to
be included in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and delivered to the Registrant's
shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, with respect to the 1998 annual meeting of shareholders of
the Registrant are incorporated herein in response to Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 of
Part III hereof, respectively.
iii
<PAGE> 4
INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
PART I
Item 1. -- BUSINESS......................................... 1
Item 2. -- PROPERTIES....................................... 12
Item 3. -- LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................ 15
Item 4. -- SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS................................................... 16
PART II
Item 5. -- MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.............................. 16
Item 6. -- SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.......................... 17
Item 7. -- MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.............. 18
Item 8. -- FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA...... 23
Item 9. -- CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE....................... 23
PART III
Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE
COMPANY'S 1997 DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT................. 23
PART IV
Item 14 -- EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.............................. 23
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS........................... F-1
EXHIBITS....................................................
</TABLE>
iv
<PAGE> 5
PART I.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
Casino Magic Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries, owns and
operates two dockside casinos on the Mississippi Gulf Coast in Bay Saint Louis
and Biloxi, Mississippi, and one dockside casino in Bossier City, Louisiana. In
addition to its United States operations, Casino Magic Corp. operates and has a
51% ownership in two casinos in Neuquen and San Martin de los Andes, Argentina.
The following is a tabulation of the Company's operating casino properties
at December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DATE CASINO
COMMENCED SQUARE SLOT TABLE HOTEL
BUSINESS FOOTAGE MACHINES GAMES ROOMS
--------- ------- -------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Bay Saint Louis............................... 9/92 39,500 1,115 43 201
Biloxi........................................ 6/93 47,700 1,196 36 387(1)
Bossier City.................................. 10/96 30,000 1,004 40 --
Argentina..................................... 1/95 29,500 473 56 --
------- ----- --- ---
Total......................................... 146,700 3,788 175 588
======= ===== === ===
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) A 387 room hotel at the Company's gaming casino in Biloxi is scheduled to
open during the second quarter of 1998.
Unless the context requires otherwise, reference in this Annual Report to
the "Company" means Casino Magic Corp. and its relevant subsidiaries, and
reference to "Casino Magic" means Casino Magic Corp. Casino Magic was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota on April 17, 1992. The
Company's principal executive and administrative offices are located at 711
Casino Magic Drive, Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi 39520. The Company's telephone
number is (228) 467-9257.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Until approximately 1988, legalized casino gaming in the United States was
restricted substantially to the State of Nevada and the City of Atlantic City,
New Jersey. Since then, legalized casino gaming has significantly expanded
throughout the United States. Numerous states have legalized either land-based,
riverboat or dockside gaming, sponsor lotteries, and sponsor the use of video
poker, video blackjack, or video lottery machines in connection with their
lotteries. In addition, since the passage of 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act,
a significant number of North American Indian tribes have established gaming on
Indian reservations. The expansion of gaming has also occurred in countries
other than the United States. Numerous countries, including Argentina, have
either adopted laws which permit gaming, or expanded such legislation to allow
private enterprises to operate casinos.
Riverboat gaming is conducted on vessels which by law are required to leave
their mooring and cruise during gaming operations. The laws generally require
cruises to be of a certain duration, and will permit dockside gaming shortly
preceding and following the cruise period. While dockside gaming must be
conducted on a vessel in a body of water, the vessel is not required to leave
its moorings, and customers may come and go at will. Dockside gaming was
authorized in Mississippi in June 1990, but gaming operations did not commence
until August 1992. Riverboat and dockside gaming was legalized in Louisiana in
1991, but gaming operations did not begin until September 1993. Some states
limit the amount that a gaming customer may bet or lose, which is referred to as
"limited stakes gaming," and prohibit the issuance of house credit. The gaming
laws of Mississippi and Louisiana permit 24-hour unlimited stakes gaming, and
permit the issuance of house credit.
1
<PAGE> 6
FINANCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING CASINOS
See "Item 6. -- SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA," and the Consolidated Statements
of Operations, page F-3 in the 1997 Financial Statements.
OPERATIONS
THE BAY SAINT LOUIS CASINO
The casino in Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi (referred to herein as "Casino
Magic-BSL") commenced operations on September 30, 1992, as the first dockside
casino in Mississippi to operate on a barge rather than a traditional riverboat.
The casino is located in a 17-acre marina that is part of a 590-acre
Company-owned site located 1.5 miles north of U.S.
Highway 90, approximately nine miles south of Interstate 10, and approximately
51 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. Casino Magic-BSL has approximately
39,500 square foot of gaming space on two levels offering 1,115 slot machines,
43 table games, poker and live keno. Amenities within the facility include a
22,500 square foot entertainment and conference barge, a 330-seat buffet
restaurant, a themed steak and seafood restaurant, an express food counter, four
bars, a gift shop, a lounge area, a customer service center and office space.
The Company owns and operates the 201-room "Casino Magic Inn" at Casino
Magic-BSL, which includes 24 suites, banquet and meeting space, and an outdoor
swimming pool with Jacuzzi. Included at the Casino Magic-BSL complex is a
97-space recreational vehicle park, child entertainment center, and an 18-hole
Arnold Palmer designed championship Golf Course. The golf course includes a
clubhouse, a pro-shop, a casual dining restaurant, and hosts an Arnold Palmer
Golf Academy. (See Item 2 -- Property).
THE BILOXI CASINO
The Company's casino in Biloxi, Mississippi (referred herein as "Casino
Magic-Biloxi") is located on the Gulf Coast south of and adjacent to U.S.
Highway 90 in the middle of a four-casino strip. Biloxi is approximately 54
miles west of Mobile, Alabama and 27 miles east of Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi.
Casino Magic-Biloxi, which opened in June 1993, contains a 47,700 square foot,
gaming space on two levels. The casino offers 1,196 slot machines and 36 table
games. Amenities include a 360-seat buffet, a themed steak and seafood
restaurant, a McDonald's restaurant operated by a franchisee unaffiliated with
the Company, two bars, a lounge and entertainment area, a customer service
center, a gift shop and office space.
Construction of a 378-room hotel on top of the existing eight story-parking
garage at Casino Magic-Biloxi is substantially completed. The hotel is expected
to open in the second quarter of 1998 and will have amenities such as a health
spa, beauty salon, swimming pool and conference space, and will include 16
suites. Although the Company has taken steps to minimize the potential
construction disruption on its existing operations at Casino Magic-Biloxi during
the hotel construction, some disruption has occurred and will continue to occur.
Prior to the opening of the hotel, it is anticipated that Casino Magic-Biloxi
will add approximately 200 employees to serve hotel guests and an anticipated
increase in casino operations. (See Item 2 -- Property).
THE BOSSIER CITY CASINO
The Company's dockside casino at Bossier City, Louisiana (referred to
herein as "Casino Magic-Bossier City"), is located on 23 acres of land on the
Red River, and is within one mile of Interstate 20. Bossier City is immediately
across the Red River from Shreveport, Louisiana and approximately 180-miles east
of the Dallas/Fort Worth.
Casino Magic-Bossier City which opened on October 4, 1996 includes a 30,000
square foot floating dockside casino, a 55,000 square foot entertainment, food
and beverage pavilion, a four story 1,500 space parking garage, and surface
parking for 400 cars. The Company has completed the architectural and
engineering plans and has broken ground for the construction of a 188-room hotel
and the expansion of the pavilion area. The expanded pavilion and the hotel are
planned to include a themed steak and seafood restaurant, a bar and a swimming
pool. The development and construction of these improvements are largely
dependent upon the $11.7 million in proceeds from the sale of the Crescent City
Riverboat and future
2
<PAGE> 7
operating cash flow of Casino Magic-Bossier City. There are no assurances that
the proceeds from the sale of the Crescent City Riverboat and the cash flow from
the operations of Casino Magic-Bossier City will be sufficient to complete the
planned projects. (See Item 2 -- Property).
CASINO MAGIC-NORTH DAKOTA
The Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a consulting
agreement with the Sisseton-Wahpeton Dakota Nation ("Sisseton") to provide
consulting services to Sisseton concerning the operation of a casino facility on
Tribal land located adjacent to Interstate 29, 75 miles north of Fargo, North
Dakota. The Company began providing these services in November 1996 after the
opening of a temporary casino facility. Sisseton terminated this consulting
agreement in January 1998.
CASINO MAGIC-ARGENTINA
In December 1994, the Company, acquired a twelve year concession agreement
to operate two casinos in the Argentine Province of Neuquen (referred herein as
"Casino Magic-Neuquen"). Through its subsidiary, Casino Magic Neuquen S.A., the
Company began gaming operations in the Argentine cities of Neuquen and San
Martin de los Andes on January 1, 1995. The larger of the two casinos is located
in the city of Neuquen, and has approximately 27,000 square foot of gaming space
and contains 40 table games, 398 slot machines and a 384-seat bingo facility.
The smaller casino in San Martin de los Andes, a resort town approximately 200
miles southwest of the city of Neuquen has approximately 2,500 square foot of
gaming space, 75 slot machines and 16 table games. Prior to December 1994, the
Neuquen provincial government operated the two casinos. (See Item
2 -- Property).
On June 1, 1997 the Company sold a 49% interest in Casino Magic Neuquen
S.A., to Crown Casino Corp. for $7.0 million. The Company has retained a
controlling interest in Casino Magic Neuquen S.A. and manages its two casinos
Argentina for a fee equal to two percent of Casino Magic Neuquen S.A.'s gross
revenues.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
INDIANA
Casino Magic, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Crawford County Casino,
Corp. ("Indiana Corp.") is one of two applicants for the tenth gaming license
expected to be issued in the State of Indiana. If successful in obtaining this
gaming license, the Company has entered into an option agreement to sell to
Harrah's Operating Company the common stock of Indiana Corp. which owns options
on a site located in Crawford County, Indiana, on the Ohio River for
approximately $5.0 million. The option expires in January 2001. The Company is
not optimistic, and can give no assurances, that a gaming license will be
obtained for its site in Indiana.
OTHER
The Company has purchased land and acquired options to lease land in states
that have not legalized gaming activities. The costs of the options are fully
reserved on the Company's financial statements and the carry value of purchased
land represents non-gaming values.
PROPOSED MERGER
On February 19, 1998, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Hollywood Park, Inc. ("Hollywood"), and
Acquisition II, Inc. ("HP") a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hollywood. Under the
Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed, subject to approval of the Company's
shareholders and Regulatory approval, to merge (the "Merger") with HP. Upon such
Merger, the Company shall be the surviving entity and will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Hollywood. The separate existence of HP will then cease. Upon the
Merger, the shareholders of the Company will be entitled to receive
3
<PAGE> 8
$2.27 for each share of the Company's stock held. All shareholders of the
Company will be entitled to dissent from the Merger in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota law.
The Merger is subject to the approval of the Company's shareholders prior
to October 31, 1998, and to the approval of the Mississippi Gaming Commission,
the Nevada Gaming Commission, and the Louisiana Gaming Control Board. The Merger
is also contingent upon other matters, including a requirement that neither the
Company nor Hollywood has materially breached any warranty, representation or
covenant contained in the Merger Agreement prior to the time of the Merger. If
the Merger Agreement is terminated for certain reasons, including a voluntary
termination by the Company should the Board of Directors of the Company
determine to accept a proposal of another party to merge with or acquire the
Company on terms which it believes to be superior to those contained in the
Merger Agreement, the Company will be required to pay Hollywood $3,500,000.
The Merger Agreement restricts the ability of the Company to engage in
certain transactions prior to the time of the Merger, except those which are in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, unless the
Company obtains the consent of Hollywood, which consent may not be unreasonably
withheld. These provisions, among other things, preclude the Company from
issuing any additional capital stock or options to purchase capital stock,
entering into employment agreements, increasing the benefits payable under
existing severance or termination pay policies or agreements, increasing
compensation to directors or employees, declaring dividends, redeeming capital
stock, adopting or terminating any employee benefit plan, and doing other things
which are not in the ordinary course of business. The Merger Agreement also
imposes limits on the capital expenditures and borrowing which the Company may
effect, which are not inconsistent with the Company's current plans.
There is no assurance that all the necessary approvals for the Merger will
be obtained, or that the Merger will be consummated as proposed. (See Note 8 to
the Financial Statements)
MARKETS
CASINO MAGIC-BSL AND CASINO MAGIC-BILOXI MARKETS
Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi are two of the twelve casinos in
operation in the Mississippi Gulf Coast market. A majority of the customers of
these two casinos reside within 150 miles of the two sites. This primary market
area includes a population of an estimated 4.5 million residents. New Orleans,
Louisiana is approximately 51 miles west of Casino Magic-BSL, and Mobile,
Alabama is approximately 54 miles east of Casino Magic-Biloxi. Previously, the
market range was limited due to the lack of overnight, on-site accommodations on
the Mississippi Gulf Coast. The opening of the 201-room Casino Magic Inn at
Casino Magic-BSL has allowed the Company to expand its market range beyond the
traditional 150-mile range. With the completion of the golf course in Casino
Magic-BSL (opened February 19, 1997) and the anticipated completion in the
second quarter of 1998 of the Casino Magic-Biloxi hotel, the Company expects to
draw additional visitors from areas outside the 150-mile radius.
The major market for Casino Magic-BSL is the greater New Orleans, Louisiana
metropolitan area where over 1.5 million adults reside. In addition to local
residents, Casino Magic-Biloxi attracts customers from Mobile, Alabama, and
Pensacola, Florida. The Mobile-Pensacola region is home to over 1,000,000
adults. Mobile and the Florida Panhandle area account for a significant portion
of Casino Magic-Biloxi's customers. In addition, Casino Magic-Biloxi's location
in the middle of the Biloxi Strip enables it to attract customers from
surrounding casinos. Local gaming industry marketing surveys have indicated the
typical non-resident gaming customer visits an average of three casinos.
CASINO MAGIC-BOSSIER CITY MARKET
Casino Magic-Bossier City is one of our four casinos operating in the
Shreveport/Bossier City, Louisiana metropolitan area. Casino Magic-Bossier
City's primary market is the 6.8 million adults residing within 200 miles of
Bossier City, including persons residing in the Dallas-Forth Worth area which is
located approximately 180 miles west of Casino Magic-Bossier City. Casino
Magic-Bossier City's location provides
4
<PAGE> 9
customers from the Dallas-Fort Worth market direct access from Interstate
Highway 20, the major east-west artery connecting Dallas-Fort Worth to Bossier
City. Other cities within 200 miles of Casino Magic-Bossier City include
Longview and Tyler, Texas and Monroe, Louisiana.
MARKETING
The Company's marketing programs consist of a variety of advertising,
direct mail and promotional programs intended to encourage more repeat visits to
the Company's facilities. These marketing efforts utilize a wide variety of
media, including television, radio, newspaper and outdoor, with direct mail
advertising of its Magic Money Player's Club, special promotions, events and
entertainment, and a motorcoach program. The Company believes that the Magic
Money Player's Club is the most important marketing tool utilized by the
Company. Similar to a frequent flier airline program or cash back credit card,
it promotes customer loyalty and frequent use. Player's Club members can be
targeted for direct-mail offers and promotions, along with information on
upcoming events, entertainment schedules, current membership incentives and
photos of recent winning patrons. The Magic Money Player's Club also provides
benefits to the customer, such as cash rewards, club perquisites and a sense of
belonging. Because gaming members earn points that are redeemable for cash, the
Magic Money Player's Club provides an effective way to give back to loyal
customers a portion of their play. The reward levels are viewed as goals for the
member and therefore increase length of stay and frequency of visits. Active
members with high play levels are also rewarded with complimentary entertainment
and event tickets as well as free dining and lodging. Since other competing
casinos have similar "clubs", the perceived quality of such clubs is an
important marketing factor.
All three domestic properties actively promote group motorcoach package
programs. Intended to maintain customer volume during traditionally nonpeak
times, bus programs originate at locations 50 to 250 miles from the properties,
are completed in one day, and are generally organized by one of the
participants. Professional tour operators also organize bus trips which
originate at locations more than 250 miles from the Casinos. These motorcoach
groups will typically spend one or more nights away from home.
CASINO MAGIC-ARGENTINA
The two casinos comprising Casino Magic-Neuquen are in the Province of
Neuquen located in west central Argentina. The population within a 150-miles
radius of those two cities is approximately 900,000. The cities of Neuquen and
San Martin de los Andes are located near a number of Argentine tourist
attractions including national parks, ski resorts and a wide variety of outdoor
activities. The two cities have a combined total of more than 5,000 hotel rooms.
SEASONALITY
The Company's current gaming operations on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and
in Bossier City, Louisiana are subject to seasonal variation. Gaming revenues
typically increase during the summer months of the year. The operations of
Casino Magic-Argentina, also experience similar seasonal variation due to
reliance on tourism which is during the summer and winter months.
COMPETITION
GENERAL
The Company 's casinos on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and in Bossier City,
Louisiana have experienced intense competition. Many of the Company's
competitors have greater amenities, name recognition, marketing capabilities and
financial resources. In attempting to attract customers to its casinos, the
Company faces, or may face, increasing competition from new casinos developed on
the Mississippi Gulf Coast, in Northwest Louisiana and in surrounding market
areas, and from established gaming centers such as those in Nevada and Atlantic
City, New Jersey. The Company also faces competition from other forms of lawful
gaming, such as state-sponsored lotteries and video lottery terminals,
pari-mutuel betting on horse and dog racing, and bingo parlors as well as from
other forms of entertainment. It is possible that increased competition could
have a material adverse effect on the Company.
5
<PAGE> 10
CASINO MAGIC-BSL AND CASINO MAGIC-BILOXI
The Company's current Mississippi operations compete primarily with ten
other dockside gaming casinos on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Eight competing
facilities are located in Biloxi and two are located in Gulfport, approximately
10 miles from Biloxi and 15 miles from Bay Saint Louis. In addition, the Company
believes that many of its competitors will add or enhance their existing
amenities, and new competitors will enter the Mississippi Gulf Coast market.
Intense competition on the Mississippi Gulf Coast has contributed to the closing
of two gaming facilities, and two casino operators reorganizing under bankruptcy
protection. Mississippi law does not limit the number of gaming licenses that
may be granted. Any increase in the number of gaming facilities along the
Mississippi Gulf Coast and surrounding areas could have a material adverse
effect on the Company.
The Company's management believes that Casino Magic-Biloxi should be more
competitive after the 387 room hotel opens in the second quarter of 1998.
However, Casino Magic-Biloxi is faced with additional competition from the
Imperial Palace, which opened in January 1998. While results of operations to
Casino Magic-Biloxi have remained slightly ahead of last year since the opening
of Imperial Palace, the full impact of such competition may not yet have been
experienced. At the beginning of 1999, Mirage Resorts, Inc. plans to open the
Beau Rivage casino in Biloxi. It is likely that the opening of the Imperial
Palace and Beau Rivage casinos will add more competitive pressure to the Biloxi
area. Since the Biloxi market is not expected to grow at the same rate as the
added gaming positions, Casino Magic-Biloxi may ultimately experience a loss of
revenues until the market for gaming in Biloxi grows to meet the added gaming
positions, if ever.
Casino Magic-BSL's principal market is the local population and suburban
areas of New Orleans. The establishment of a land-based casino in New Orleans in
the future could have an adverse effect on Casino Magic-BSL, although the
Company does not believe that it will be materially adverse to the Casino
Magic-BSL operations. The opening of the Imperial Palace in Biloxi in January
1998, and the Beau Rivage casino scheduled to open in 1999 in Biloxi, could also
have a material adverse affect on Casino Magic-BSL revenues. However, while the
Bay Saint Louis and Biloxi markets overlap, the Company does not believe that
the competitive impact of the opening of the Imperial Palace and Beau Rivage
casinos will be material on operations of Casino Magic-BSL.
Circus Circus, Inc. is planning to develop a casino on the north shore of
the Bay of Saint Louis (the Company's casino barge is on the south shore of the
Bay of Saint Louis) approximately 15 minutes off of Interstate 10. If
established, access to the Circus Circus casino will be quicker and easier from
the Interstate than the current access to Casino Magic-BSL. The development of a
casino or casinos on the north shore of the Bay of Saint Louis will, in all
likelihood, adversely impact the revenues of Casino Magic-BSL. To attempt to
offset this potential competition, the Company believes it must develop its Bay
Saint Louis properties as a destination resort, with a first class hotel and
other amenities, to compliment its casino and Arnold Palmer Championship Golf
Course. The capital necessary to accomplish this development is not currently
available.
CASINO MAGIC-BOSSIER CITY
Thirteen of the fifteen available riverboat gaming licenses are currently
operating in Louisiana, all of which except for Casino Magic-Bossier City, have
opened since September 1993. Of these thirteen riverboat casinos, four are
currently licensed and operate in the Bossier City/Shreveport market and offer
substantially similar gaming facilities. Casino Magic-Bossier City faces
competition from those existing operations, particularly to the extent that they
add to or enhance existing amenities. For example, Binion's Horseshoe Casino has
completed construction of a 606-room all suites hotel at its riverboat casino
location in Bossier City. In addition, Horseshoe Casino has replaced its
original casino riverboat with a new riverboat that offers significantly
expanded gaming and non-gaming areas. This expanded riverboat in conjunction
with the new hotel gives Horseshoe casino a significant advantage in the Bossier
City/Shreveport market. Another casino operator in the area has begun
construction of an onsite hotel.
On June 1997, the Louisiana legislature passed a bill that would allow
racetracks in Saint Landry, Calcasieu and Bossier parishes to install slot
machines. The Governor of Louisiana has signed the bill and pursuant to the
Constitutional Amendment the introduction of this new form of gaming has been
approved by
6
<PAGE> 11
each affected parish in a local referendum. However, new legislation relating to
the taxation of the slot machines will need to be passed with a 66% approval
margin in order to fully implement this new legislation. The impact of the
legislation, if approved, on the Company can not currently be determined.
TEXAS AND ALABAMA LEGALIZATION RISKS
Casino gaming is currently prohibited in several jurisdictions adjacent to
Louisiana and Mississippi. As a result, residents of these jurisdictions,
principally Texas and Alabama, comprise a significant portion of the customers
of Casino Magic-BSL, Casino Magic-Biloxi and Casino Magic-Bossier City.
Although casino gaming is not currently permitted in Texas and the Texas
Attorney General has issued an opinion that gaming in Texas would require an
amendment to the Texas Constitution, the Texas Legislature has considered
various proposals to authorize casino gaming. The legalization of casino gaming
in Texas and the opening of one or more casinos in the Dallas/Fort Worth area,
which is a major market for Bossier City/Shreveport gaming operations, would
have a material adverse effect on Casino Magic-Bossier City operations.
Casino gaming is currently illegal in Alabama due to a constitutional
prohibition against lotteries. Several attempts have been made to pass a
resolution of the Alabama Legislature providing for a statewide referendum on
the repeal of the pertinent section of the Alabama Constitution prohibiting
lotteries (and thereby gaming). Currently Alabama allows pari-mutuel wagering
and limited charitable bingo within the state. The legalization of casino gaming
in Alabama would have a material adverse effect on the Company's Mississippi
operations, particularly Casino Magic-Biloxi, both because the Mobile
metropolitan area is a major market for the Company's Casino Magic-Biloxi
operation and because a substantial portion of the Company's customers are
residents of areas east of Mobile, including Florida and Georgia.
ARGENTINA
The Company's two casinos in the Province of Neuquen, Argentina, located in
the cities of Neuquen and San Martin de los Andes are currently the only
operating casinos in the Province of Neuquen. There are, however, 44
government-operated casino operations throughout the country, including a casino
in Chipolletti, across the Rio Negro River from the City of Neuquen in Rio Negro
Province, and a casino in Rio Negro Province approximately 10 miles southeast of
the city of Neuquen.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
UNITED STATES
The ownership and operation of a casino gaming business within the United
States and other jurisdictions in which the Company operates are subject to
extensive and complex governmental regulation and control under federal, state
or local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are subject to change
including the repeal of laws which permit gaming. The Company and certain of its
officers, directors, key employees, shareholders and other affiliates
("Regulated Persons") are subject to strict legal and regulatory requirements,
including mandatory licensing and approval requirements, suitability
requirements, and ongoing regulatory oversight with respect to such gaming
operations. Such legal and regulatory requirements and oversight will be
administered and exercised by the relevant regulatory agency or agencies in each
jurisdiction.
The Company and the Regulated Persons will need to satisfy the licensing,
approval and suitability requirements of each jurisdiction in which the Company
seeks to become involved in gaming operations. Such requirements vary from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but generally concern the responsibility,
financial stability and character of the owners and managers of gaming
operations, as well as persons financially interested or involved in operations.
In general, the procedures for gaming licensing, approval and findings of
suitability require that the Company and each Regulated Person to submit
detailed background and financial information and that the Company demonstrate
that the proposed gaming operation has adequate financial resources generated
from suitable sources and adequate procedures to comply with the operating
controls and requirements imposed by law and regulation in each jurisdiction.
This submission is normally followed by a
7
<PAGE> 12
thorough investigation by the regulatory authorities. An application for any
gaming license, approval or finding of suitability may be denied for any cause
that the regulatory authorities deem reasonable. There can be no assurance that
the Company or the Regulated Persons will obtain or maintain all of the
necessary licenses, approvals and findings of suitability to permit the Company
to continue its development plans. Once a license or approval is obtained, the
Company will be required to periodically submit detailed financial and operating
reports to regulatory authorities. Such licenses and approvals may be subject to
periodic renewal and generally are not transferable. The regulatory authorities
may at any time revoke, suspend, condition, limit or restrict a license,
approval, or finding of suitability for any cause they deem reasonable. Fines
for violations may be levied against the holder of a license and in some
jurisdictions gaming operation revenues can be forfeited to the state under
certain circumstances. The laws, regulations and procedures pertaining to gaming
are subject to the interpretation of the regulatory authorities and may be
amended. Any changes in such laws or regulations, or their current
interpretations, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
MISSISSIPPI GAMING REGULATIONS
In 1990, the State of Mississippi legalized dockside casino gaming for
counties along the Mississippi River and the Gulf Coast. The legislation gave
each of those counties the opportunity to hold a referendum on whether to allow
dockside casino gaming within its boundaries. Mississippi law permits gaming
licensees to offer unlimited stakes gaming on a 24-hour basis. The law does not
restrict the amount or percentage of space on a vessel that may be utilized for
gaming. The legislation also does not limit the number of licenses that the
Mississippi Gaming Commission (the "Mississippi Commission") can grant a
particular area and does not impose different conditions on different licensees.
The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Mississippi are
subject to extensive state and local regulation. The Company, through its
subsidiaries, holds licenses for Casino Magic-Biloxi and Casino Magic-BSL under
the Mississippi Gaming Control Act (the "Mississippi Act"). Each license is site
specific. The Company's current and proposed gaming operations are subject to
the licensing and regulatory control of the Mississippi Commission and various
federal, state, county and city regulatory agencies. The Mississippi Commission
adopted regulations in furtherance of the Mississippi Act. These regulations
have been amended from time to time since that date.
Each of the directors, officers and certain key employees of the Company
who are actively and directly engaged in the administration or supervision of
gaming, or who have any other significant influence on the activities of the
Company, must be found suitable therefor and may be required to be licensed by
the Mississippi Commission. In practice, a finding of suitability of an
individual is considered the same as licensing that individual. The finding of
suitability requires submission of detailed personal financial information
followed by a thorough investigation. Although certain current members of the
Company's management have been found suitable in connection with the licensing
of the Casino Magic-Biloxi and Casino Magic-BSL, there can be no assurance that
additional key personnel or management persons who may be recruited from time to
time by the Company will be found suitable by the Mississippi Commission, if the
Mississippi Commission were to find a director, officer or key employee
unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with
the Company, the Company would have to suspend, dismiss and sever all
relationships with such person. The Company would have similar obligations with
regard to any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Each gaming
employee must obtain a work permit. The Mississippi Commission may refuse to
issue a work permit to a gaming employee for various grounds enumerated in the
Mississippi Act, including if the employee has committed larceny, embezzlement
or any crime of moral turpitude, or knowingly violated the Mississippi Act or
Mississippi regulations, or for any other reasonable cause. Denial of a work
permit is mandatory if the applicant has committed, attempted or conspired to
commit a felony.
The licenses obtained by the Company have terms of two years and are not
transferable. New licenses must be obtained at the end of each two-year period.
There can be no assurance that new licenses can be obtained. The Mississippi
Commission has the power to deny, limit, condition, revoke and suspend any
license, finding of suitability or registration, and to fine any person as it
deems reasonable and in the public interest, subject to an opportunity for a
hearing. The Mississippi Commission may fine any licensee or other
8
<PAGE> 13
person who is subject to the Mississippi Act up to $100,000 for each violation
of the Mississippi Act, which is the subject of an initial complaint, and up to
$250,000 for each such violation which is the subject of any subsequent
complaint. The Mississippi Act provides for judicial review of certain decisions
of the Mississippi Commission by petition to a Mississippi circuit court, but
the filing of such petition does not necessarily stay any such action taken by
the Mississippi Commission pending a decision by the circuit court.
Any individual who is found to have a material relationship to, or material
involvement with, the Company or, in the discretion of the Gaming Commission,
any other person associated with a gaming establishment of the Company, may be
required to be investigated in order to be found suitable or to be licensed as a
business associate of the Company. Key employees, controlling persons or others
who exercise significant influence upon the management or affairs of the Company
may also be deemed to have such a relationship or involvement.
The Mississippi Act requires that owners of more than 10% of the Company's
voting securities be found suitable by the Mississippi Commission. The statutes
and regulations also give the Mississippi Commission the discretion to require a
suitability finding with respect to anyone who acquires any security of the
Company regardless of the percentage of ownership. The current policy of the
Mississippi Commission is to require anyone acquiring 5% or more of any voting
securities to be found suitable. If the owner of voting securities who is
required to be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must
submit detailed business and financial information including a list of
beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation.
Any owner of voting securities who is found unsuitable and who holds,
directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of equity interests in the
Company beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Mississippi
Commission may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Additionally, any person who fails or
refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after
being ordered to do so by such Commission may be found unsuitable. The Company
is subject to disciplinary action if, after it receives notice that a person is
unsuitable to have any relationship with it, the Company (i) pays the unsuitable
person any distributions or interest upon any securities of the Company or any
payments or distribution of any kind whatsoever, (ii) recognizes the exercise,
directly or indirectly, of any voting rights in its securities by the unsuitable
person, or (iii) pays the unsuitable person any remuneration in any form for
services rendered or otherwise, except in certain limited and specific
circumstances.
The Company will be required to maintain current equity ownership ledgers
in the State of Mississippi which may be examined by the Mississippi Commission
at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee,
the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial
owner to the Mississippi Commission. A failure to make such disclosure may be
grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. The Company also is required
to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial
owner.
The Mississippi Act requires that certificates representing equity
securities of the Company bear a legend to the general effect that the
securities are subject to the Mississippi Act and regulations of the Mississippi
Commission. The Mississippi Commission has the authority to grant a waiver from
the legend requirement, which the Company has obtained. The Mississippi
Commission has the power to impose additional restrictions on the holders of the
Company's securities at any time through its power to regulate licenses.
The regulations provide that a change in control of the Company may not
occur without the prior approval of the Mississippi Commission. Mississippi law
prohibits the Company from making a public offering of its securities without
the approval of the Mississippi Commission if any part of the proceeds of the
offering is to be used to finance the construction, acquisition or operation of
gaming facilities in Mississippi, or to retire or extend obligations incurred
for one or more of such purposes.
The Mississippi Commission has enacted regulations requiring that, as a
condition to licensure or renewal licensure, an applicant provide a plan to
develop "infrastructure facilities" amounting to 25% of the cost of the casino
and a parking facility capable of accommodating 500 cars. "Infrastructure
facilities" include any of the following: a 250-room hotel, theme park, golf
course, marina, tennis complex, or any other facilities approved
9
<PAGE> 14
by the Mississippi Commission, but such team does not include parking
facilities, roads, sewage and water systems or civic facilities. The Mississippi
Commission may reduce the number of rooms required in a hotel, where it is shown
to the satisfaction of the Mississippi Commission that sufficient rooms are
available to accommodate the anticipated number of visitors. Management believes
that the Company is in compliance with this regulation.
The Company's future gaming operations outside of Mississippi are also
subject to approval by the Mississippi Commission.
LOUISIANA GAMING REGULATIONS
In 1991 the Louisiana legislature enacted the Louisiana Riverboat Economic
and Gaming Control Act, LSA-R.S. 4:501, et. seq. (the "Louisiana Gaming Act").
The Louisiana Gaming Act authorized the licensing of up to 15 riverboats to
conduct gaming on designated rivers and waterways. Pursuant to the Louisiana
Gaming Act, the Riverboat Gaming Commission (the "Louisiana Commission"), was
created within the Department of Public Safety and Corrections for the State of
Louisiana. Additionally, a riverboat gaming regulatory group within the
Louisiana State Police was created. The Louisiana Gaming Commission and the
State Police were authorized to and did promulgate the existing rules and
regulations governing the licensing and operations of riverboats. The Louisiana
legislature in the First Extraordinary Session, 1996, enacted new legislation
(the "Louisiana Board Act") which transferred the regulatory oversight of most
gaming operations in Louisiana, including riverboat gaming, to the Gaming
Control Board (the "Louisiana Board"), effective as of May 1, 1996. The
Louisiana Commission was abolished as of that same date. The Louisiana Board
consists of nine members appointed by the Governor of Louisiana.
The Louisiana Board is empowered to regulate four forms of gaming
activities and operations in the state: riverboat, video poker, the landbased
casino in New Orleans, and all state regulated aspects of Indian gaming.
(Excluded is the regulation and oversight of horse racing and off-track betting,
the state lottery, and charitable gaming.) Accordingly, the Louisiana Board has
all regulatory authority, control, and jurisdiction, including investigation,
licensing, and enforcement, and all power incidental to or necessary for such
regulatory authority, control and jurisdiction, over all aspects of gaming
activities and operations as authorized pursuant to the provisions of the
Louisiana Gaming Act, the Louisiana Economic Development and Gaming Corporation
Act (Land-Based Casino in New Orleans), and the Video Draw Poker Devices Control
Act.
The Louisiana Board has been authorized to promulgate rules and regulations
to govern the aforesaid types of gaming in Louisiana; however, all
administrative rules and regulations promulgated by entities whose powers have
been transferred to the Louisiana Board are to be considered valid and remain in
effect until repealed by the Louisiana Board.
The State Police conduct investigations and audits regarding the
qualifications of applicants for licenses or permits requiring suitability
determinations, submit all investigative reports to the Louisiana Board, conduct
audits to assist the Louisiana Board, issue certain licenses and permits in
accordance with rules adopted by the Louisiana Board, and perform all other
duties and functions necessary for the efficient and thorough regulation and
control of gaming activities and operations under the Louisiana Board's
jurisdiction.
The Louisiana Board Act did not repeal the Louisiana Gaming Act, the
original 1991 statute authorizing riverboat gaming in Louisiana, but rather
amended it to transfer licensing and regulatory authority to the Louisiana Board
and to redefine the authority of the State Police. Otherwise the Louisiana
Gaming Act remains in effect. Accordingly, the Louisiana Gaming Act continues to
authorize up to 15 licenses to conduct gaming activities on riverboats, with no
more than six licenses to be granted to riverboats operating in any one parish.
Current Louisiana law limits the number of riverboat casino licenses in the
state to 15, all but one of which have been awarded, and limits the
concentration of riverboat casino licenses in any one parish to six. The
relative success of gaming operations in the Bossier City/Shreveport market, as
compared to other Louisiana markets, may increase the possibility that existing
licenses may be relocated to the Bossier City/Shreveport market. However, the
relocation of existing licenses to another parish or of riverboats within
10
<PAGE> 15
the same parish is restricted by the Constitutional Amendment which requires,
among other things, a local parish-wide election to approve, by majority vote,
the licensing of any additional riverboats in a parish with existing licensed
riverboats or the relocation of any operating riverboat to a different berth in
the same parish.
A Constitutional Amendment was approved by voters statewide, which requires
local option elections in parishes before new forms of gaming may be conducted
therein or before existing forms of gaming may be conducted in new areas. For
example, the Constitutional Amendment requires a local option referendum before
an additional riverboat could move into a parish, regardless of whether such
parish had authorized the continuation of riverboat gaming in such parish in the
Louisiana Referendum. In this respect, (i.e., relocation of riverboat gaming
vessels to new locations) the Constitutional Amendment would appear to be more
restrictive than the legislation requiring the Louisiana Referendum.
Licenses may be and have been issued for dockside riverboat gaming along
the Red River in the Shreveport/Bossier City area. Dockside gaming is presently
prohibited at other locations in the state. A riverboat gaming license has an
initial term of five years, with subsequent annual renewals thereafter. Pursuant
to the decision of the State Police at a hearing held on April 30, 1996, the
Louisiana riverboat gaming license acquired by the Company has an unexpired term
of five years less the sixty-five days that the previous licensee conducted
riverboat gaming operations. The unexpired term of the license recommenced on
October 4, 1996 the date that the Company began riverboat gaming operations in
Bossier City. The application for renewal consists of a sworn statement of all
changes in information, including financial information, provided in any
previous applications. The transfer of a license is prohibited. The Louisiana
Board may restrict, suspend or revoke a license or permit. Suspension or
revocation of any license or permit would have a material adverse effect upon
the business of the Company.
Pursuant to the existing laws, rules and regulations, the Company must
periodically submit detailed financial, operating and other reports to the
Louisiana Board and substantially all loans, leases, private sales of
securities, extensions of credit and similar financing transactions entered into
by any of the Regulated Persons, must be reported to the Louisiana Board for
prior approval or for a determination that the transaction does not need prior
approval The applicant for a gaming license, its directors, officers, key
personnel, partners, and persons holding a 5% or greater interest in the
applicant and their spouses will be required to be found suitable by the
Louisiana Board. This requires the filing of an extensive application to the
Louisiana Board disclosing personal, financial, criminal, business and other
information. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation. There
can be no assurance that such person will be found suitable by the Louisiana
Board. An application for licensing of an individual may be denied for any cause
deemed reasonable by the Louisiana Board. Any individual who is found to have a
material relationship to or a material involvement with, the Company may be
required to be investigated in order to be found suitable or be licensed as a
business associate of an applicant. Key employees, controlling persons or others
who exercise significant influence upon the management or affairs of the Company
may also be deemed to have such a relationship or involvement.
If the Louisiana Board were to find a director, officer or key employee
unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with an
applicant, the applicant would have to suspend, dismiss and sever all
relationships with such person. The applicant would have similar obligations
with regard to any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Each
gaming employee must obtain a gaming employee permit which may be revoked upon
the occurrence of certain specified events.
The sale, assignment, transfer, pledge or disposition of securities which
represent 5% of more of the total outstanding shares issued by a corporate
licensee is subject to Louisiana Board approval. After a license is granted, any
person acquiring an economic interest of 5% or more in a license must obtain the
Louisiana Board's prior approval for the transaction. Failure to obtain that
approval is grounds for license revocation. A security issued by a corporate
license must generally disclose these restrictions.
If the Louisiana Board finds that an individual holder of a corporate
licensee's securities or a director, partner, officer or manager of the licensee
is not qualified pursuant to the existing laws, rules and regulations, and if as
a result the licensee is no longer qualified to continue as a licensee, it can
propose action necessary to protect the public interest, including the
suspension or revocation of a license or permit. It may also issue, under
penalty of revocation of license, a condition of disqualification naming the
person and declaring that
11
<PAGE> 16
such person may not (a) receive dividends or interest on securities of the
licensee, (b) exercise any right conferred by securities of the licensee, (c)
receive remuneration or any other economic benefit from the licensee or continue
in an ownership or economic interest in the licensee or remain as a director,
partner, officer, or manager of the licensee.
FOREIGN
The Provincial Government of Neuquen, Argentina enacted a casino
privatization program to issue 12-year exclusive concession agreements to
operate existing casinos. The Company's two casinos are the only casinos in the
province of Neuquen, in west central Argentina, and are located in Neuquen City
and San Martin de los Andes. The casinos had previously been operated by the
provincial government. The Ministry of Finance of Argentina has adopted a
modified regulatory system for casinos, based on the regulatory system utilized
by the State of Nevada, and such regulatory system is being administered by the
Provincial Government of Neuquen. The Company cannot predict what effect the
enactment of other laws, regulations or pronouncements relating to casino
operations may have on the operations of the Casino Magic-Argentina.
NON-GAMING REGULATION
The Company is subject to certain federal, state and local safety and
health laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to non-gaming businesses
generally, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Occupational Safety and
Health Act, Resource Conservation Recovery Act and the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. The Company has not
made, and does not anticipate making, material expenditures with respect to such
environmental laws and regulations. However, the coverage and attendant
compliance costs associated with such laws, regulations and ordinances may
result in future additional costs to the Company's operations. For example, in
1990 the U.S. Congress enacted the Oil Pollution Act to consolidate and
rationalize mechanisms under various oil spill response laws. The Department of
Transportation has proposed regulations requiring owners and operators of
certain vessels to establish through the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial
responsibility in the amount of $5.5 million for clean-up of oil pollution. This
requirement would be satisfied by either proof of adequate insurance (including
self-insurance) or the posting of a surety bond or guaranty.
Riverboats capable of cruising, including those that are not required to
cruise, such as the Company's boat in Bossier City, Louisiana, must comply with
U.S. Coast Guard requirements as to boat design, on-board facilities, equipment,
personnel and safety. Each of them must hold a Certificate of Seaworthiness or
must be approved by the American Bureau of Shipping ("ABS") Building Code. The
U.S. Coast Guard requirements establish design standards, set limits on the
operation of the vessels and require individual licensing of all personnel
involved with the operation of the vessels. Loss of a vessel's Certificate of
Seaworthiness or ABS approval would preclude its use as a floating casino.
All employees engaged on a riverboat, even those who have nothing to do
with the actual operation of the vessel, such as dealers, waiters and security
personnel, may be subject to the Jones Act which, among other things, exempts
those employees from state limits on workers' compensation awards.
COMPANY LICENSES AND APPLICATIONS
To date, other than in Mississippi, Louisiana and Argentina, no gaming
licenses, approvals or findings of suitability have been obtained or, other than
in Indiana, applied for by the Company. The Company may apply for additional
gaming licenses in domestic and international jurisdictions. The loss or
suspension of any such license, or the failure to obtain any license for
properties upon which the Company plans to operate a gaming casino in the
future, would have a material adverse affect on the Company's business.
INFORMATION REGARDING FOREIGN OPERATIONS
The Company operates casinos in Argentina. Although a number of the
Company's employees have experience in the operation of casinos outside of the
United States, the Company's executive officers have had limited experience in
such operations. The distance of the operations from the Company's executive
offices,
12
<PAGE> 17
the stability of the relevant government, regulations imposed by the foreign
government, tax issues, and the acceptance of American-style gaming are all
risks associated with a foreign operation with which the Company's management
has had limited previous experience. Additionally, the Company's operations in
foreign jurisdictions are subject to risks associated with currency exchange
rate fluctuations and the repatriation of funds.
SERVICE MARKS
Casino Magic is the owner of U.S. service mark registrations for the
service marks "Casino Magic(R)", "A Cut Above(R)" "Casino Magic Getaways(SM)",
"Magic Money(SM)", "ABRACADABRA'S" and "Amazing Randolphs" granted by the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office on July 13, 1993, June 21, 1994, October 18, 1994,
December 2, 1997, March 3, 1998 and March 3, 1998 respectively. Casino Magic is
also the owner of a Canadian service mark registration for "Casino Magic(R)"
service mark granted on March 3, 1995. The Company has filed service mark
registration applications for the "Casino Magic" service mark in Greece and
Mexico. The Company also uses and claims rights to several additional service
marks. The effect of the Company's service marks is to provide an identity
between the Company and its services. U.S. service mark registrations provide
protection for a period of 10 years from the date of registration and may be
renewed indefinitely for successive 10-year periods. While prior use of a
service mark may establish an exclusive right to its use in connection with the
sale of services in a particular market area, registration with the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office, or similar government agencies in foreign jurisdictions,
provides such right throughout the United States or the foreign jurisdiction and
a presumption of damage to the Company should the mark be infringed. There are
no assurances that any of the service marks used by the Company, whether or not
registered, will be free from future challenge by others as to prior use or as
otherwise being unprotectable.
PERSONNEL
As of January 1, 1998, the Company had approximately 2,800 full-time
employees and 460 part-time employees in the United States. Of the employees,
five are executive officers of the Company. The Company has approximately 265
full-time employees at two foreign locations that the Company operates. The
Company's management believes that its relationship with its employees is good.
With the expansion of gaming in the Mississippi Gulf Coast region and Northwest
Louisiana, new competitors are likely to actively recruit the Company's
management and casino personnel, many of whom have been trained at the expense
of the Company. None of the Company's employees are currently represented by a
labor union.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The discussions regarding proposed Company developments and operations
included in "Item 1 -- BUSINESS" contain forward looking statements that involve
a number of risks and uncertainties. In addition to the factors discussed above,
other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the
following: business conditions and growth in the gaming industry and the general
economy; existing and future development by gaming operators competing with the
Company; obtaining and retaining necessary licenses or regulatory approvals;
acquiring or generating funding necessary to undertake and complete development
plans; and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
The Company's principal executive and administrative offices are located in
approximately 6,000 square foot of office space in the Casino Magic-BSL support
building at 711 Casino Magic Drive, Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi 39520.
13
<PAGE> 18
CASINO MAGIC -- BSL PROPERTY
Casino Magic-BSL is located in a 17 acre arena in the Bay of Saint Louis on
the Gulf of Mexico in the city of Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi, on an
approximately 590 acre site The property, which is owned the Company, secures
the $135,000,000 First Mortgage Notes issued in October 1993. The gaming barge,
which is moored in the marina, has approximately 46,000 square foot of floor
space on two levels and provides approximately 39,500 square foot of gaming
area. The gaming area contains 1,115 slot machines and 43 table games. Access to
the barge is provided through an approximately 30,000 square foot support
building constructed on the shore of the marina. In addition to proving the
entrance to the casino, the support building contains restaurants and lounges,
customer entertainment and service facilities and office space. Adjacent to the
gaming barge is a 22,500 square foot entertainment barge, which can be used for
special events and meetings. There is surface parking for 2,500 vehicles. The
Company operates a 201 room hotel on the property which is approximately 1,000
foot from the Bay Saint Louis casino and which includes banquet and meeting
rooms. In addition, the Company operates an 18-hole Arnold Palmer designed
championship golf course, driving range and golf academy on the Bay Saint Louis
casino property. As part of the golf course, the Company has a clubhouse and
various storage facilities. Casino Magic-BSL property also contains a child care
facility and a recreational vehicle park with 97 spaces.
Management believes that Casino Magic-BSL facilities and space for
expansion are currently adequate, but that the addition of another more upscale
hotel and other amenities will be necessary to remain competitive and to
maintain Casino Magic-BSL revenues.
CASINO MAGIC-BILOXI PROPERTY
Casino Magic-Biloxi is located on the Gulf of Mexico in Biloxi,
Mississippi, on property which is either owned or leased by the Company,
including the lease from the state of Mississippi of water bottoms adjacent to
the land. Except for the Casino One Property described below, the owned and
leased properties secure the $135,000,000 First Mortgage Notes issued in October
1993. The site for Casino Magic-Biloxi has 660 foot of frontage on the south
side of U.S. Highway 90. The eastern 500 foot of that frontage consists of one
owned and two leased parcels of land. The leases provided for five year primary
terms commencing in January 1993 and 17 optional renewal terms of five years
each. In 1997, the aggregate annual base rent under the two leases was $500,000.
In 1998 and in subsequent years, that base rent will increase based on the
Consumer Price Index. The lease for the water bottoms provided for an initial
term of ten years commencing in July 1993 and one renewal term of five years.
The annual rent under the water bottoms lease for the twelve months ending in
June 1998 is $775,000 with rent for subsequent periods being in the amount to be
determined under Mississippi law regarding the leasing of "public trust
tidelands."
Another parcel of property, which is not subject to the $135,000,000 First
Mortgage Notes, (referred to as "The Casino One Property" consists of land
having approximately 160 foot of frontage on the south of U.S. Highway 90 which
is adjacent and to the west of the site of Casino Magic-Biloxi, and
approximately 2.24 acres of land which is located on the north side of U.S.
Highway 90. The Casino One Property to the north of U.S. Highway 90 consisted of
six adjacent parcels, four of which secure the payment of their respective
purchase prices. The Company's subsidiary which operates Casino Magic-Biloxi
leased the Casino One Property from another subsidiary of the Company, Casino
One Corporation to provide parking and space for the storage of construction
materials. The lease provides for base annual rent of $1,340,000.
In April 1996, the state of Mississippi claimed that the site of Casino
Magic-Biloxi and the Casino One Property located to the south of U.S. Highway 90
were artificially filled tidelands areas such that they were property held by
the state of Mississippi. The claim relating to the Casino One Property was
resolved in September 1995 pursuant to a boundary agreement which recognized the
northern 100 foot of the property as being owned by Casino One Corporation with
the state leasing the remaining portion of the property to Casino One
Corporation for a rental payment essentially equal to the property taxes which
would have otherwise been payable on the land. The Company was not able to enter
into a similar boundary agreement with respect to the site of Casino
Magic-Biloxi without the consent of all of the holders of the $135,000,000 First
Mortgage Notes issued in October 1993 and the participation of the lessors of
the two leased parcels. The Company did,
14
<PAGE> 19
however, agree to enter into appropriate agreements with the state of
Mississippi at such times as the Company was permitted to do so. It is expected
that such agreements would not materially increase the Company's cost of
possessing and using the site of Casino Magic-Biloxi.
Gaming at Casino Magic-Biloxi occurs upon a barge moored within the water
bottoms area leased from the state of Mississippi. The barge has approximately
97,200 square foot of area on three levels, which provide approximately 47,700
square foot of gaming area. Casino Magic-Biloxi, operates 1,196 slot machines,
36 table games, restaurants, and customer entertainment and service areas.
Access to the barge is provided through a 69,900 square foot support building
which acts as the entrance to the casino, and which includes entertainment,
service facilities and office space. Parking for Casino Magic-Biloxi is provided
by a 700 space eight floor parking garage located to the south of the service
building, 250 spaces of surface parking on the Casino One Property and shared
parking on an adjacent 430 space two-story parking ramp. There is also parking
for 30 tour buses on the Casino One Property on the north side of U. S. Highway
90, across from the casino.
A hotel consisting of 378 rooms is near completion on top of the eight
floor parking garage making that structure a total of 22 stories. The hotel,
which is expected to open in the second quarter of 1998, will include 86 suites,
meeting and conference facilities, a health spa, beauty salon and swimming pool.
The Company plans additional improvements to the Biloxi casino support building,
including an improvement to the casino entrance and the addition of a 24-hour
restaurant.
Management believes that Casino Magic-Biloxi facilities and space for
expansion are currently adequate, but that the property will need continued
improvement and refurbishing.
CASINO MAGIC-BOSSIER CITY PROPERTY
Casino Magic-Bossier City is located on a 23 acre site on the Red River in
Bossier City, Louisiana. The property secures the $115,000,000 First Mortgage
Notes issued in August 1996. Gaming at Casino Magic-Bossier City occurs on a
riverboat which, while capable of cruising on the river, is permanently moored
at the site. The riverboat provides approximately 30,000 square foot of area
within which the Company has located 1,004 slot machines and 40 table games.
Access to the riverboat is provided through a 55,000 square foot support
building which includes restaurants, lounges, entertainment and service areas,
and office space. A 1,500 space four-story parking garage and surface parking
for an additional 400 vehicles provide parking for Casino Magic-Bossier City.
The Company has also commenced construction of a 188-room hotel adjacent to the
support building. Construction of the hotel is scheduled to be completed before
the end of 1998. The hotel is anticipated to attract overnight casino customers,
primarily from the Dallas/Fort Worth area. To improve the competitiveness of
Casino Magic-Bossier City, the Company has also developed plans for the
expansion of the support building to provide additional restaurant facilities
and an improved interior appearance. There is no assurance that the hotel will
be completed or opened as scheduled.
Management believes that Casino Magic-Bossier City facilities and space for
expansion are adequate for the future growth and development of the facility.
CASINO MAGI -- ARGENTINA
Pursuant to the agreement between the Company's 51% owned subsidiary,
Casino Magic Neuquen S.A., and the provincial government, the Company was
allowed to use the premises established by the province for the two casinos
formerly operated by the province at those sites. The Company has continued to
use the approximately 27,000 square foot site located in the city of Neuquen. In
December, 1995, the Company relocated the site of the casino in San Martin de
los Andes to a 2,500 square foot site leased for a term of six years with a
monthly rent of $7,000. The agreement under which the Company operates the two
casinos provided for an initial term of twelve years commencing in January 1995.
The Company is entitled to a five year extension in the event at least
$5,000,000 is expended by the Company in establishing hotels for the casinos.
Monthly payments of $220,000 are to be made to the provincial government under
the agreement. If the Company elects to change the site of the Neuquen casino,
the monthly payment under the agreement is to be reduced by $40,000.
15
<PAGE> 20
Management believes that Casino Magic-Neuquen facilities and space for
expansion are adequate for the future growth and development of the facility.
OTHER PROPERTIES
The Company owns approximately nine acres of land with approximately 370
foot of shoreline in Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi on U.S. Highway 90
approximately 2.5 miles from Casino Magic-BSL. This site has been approved as
(but is probably not suitable for) a gaming site by the Mississippi Commission
and is included in the Company's financial statements at December 31, 1997, as
property held for sale having a value of $800,000.
The Company owns 25.6 acres of land on the Jordan River, immediately west
of the Company's gaming operation in Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi. The Company
acquired the property to provide additional land for future expansion and to
prevent potential competition from acquiring a possible gaming site in immediate
proximity to Casino Magic-BSL.
In 1993 and 1994, the Company acquired a 3.5 acre parcel and a 0.2 acre
parcel of unimproved land in downtown St. Louis, Missouri in anticipation of
obtaining a gaming license in that city through a joint venture with Caesars
World, Inc. for $4,000,000 and $800,000, respectively. The Company is no longer
pursuing the joint venture and, accordingly the parcels are included in the
Company's financial statements at December 31, 1997, as property held for sale
having carrying values of $4,000,000 and $800,000 respectively.
The Company also has options on potential gaming sites in Alabama and
Indiana, which the Company does not anticipate exercising.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ONGOING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A class action lawsuit was filed on April 26, 1994, in the United States
District Court, Middle District of Florida (the "Poulos Lawsuit"), naming as
defendants 41 manufacturers, distributors and casino operators of video poker
and electronic slot machines, including the Company. The lawsuit alleges that
such defendants have engaged in a course of fraudulent and misleading conduct
intended to induce people to play such games based on a false belief concerning
the operation of the gaming machines, as well as the extent to which there is an
opportunity to win. The suit alleges violations of the Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organization Act, as well as claims of common law fraud, unjust
enrichment and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks damages in excess of $6
billion. On May 10, 1994, a second class action lawsuit was filed in the United
States District Court, Middle District of Florida (the "Ahern Lawsuit") , naming
as defendants the same defendants who were named in the Poulos Lawsuit and
adding as defendants the owners of certain casino operations in Puerto Rico and
the Bahamas, who were not named as defendants in the Poulos Lawsuit. The claims
in the Ahern Lawsuit are identical to the claims in the Poulos Lawsuit. Because
of the similarity of parties and claims, the Poulos Lawsuit and Ahern Lawsuit
were consolidated into one case file in the United States District Court, Middle
District of Florida. On December 9, 1994 a motion by the defendants for change
of venue was granted, transferring the case to the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada, in Las Vegas. In response to a motion to dismiss the
Complaint brought by the Company and other defendants, the United States
District Court for the District of Nevada entered an order dated April 17, 1996,
granting the motions and dismissing the complaint without prejudice. The
plaintiffs then filed an amended Complaint on May 31, 1996, in which the
plaintiffs sought damages against the Company and other defendants in excess of
$1 billion and punitive damages for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Act and for state common law claims for fraud, unjust
enrichment and negligent misrepresentation. The Company and other defendants
have moved to dismiss the amended Complaint. The Company believes that the
claims are without merit and does not expect that the lawsuit will have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of
the Company.
On or about September 6, 1996, Casino America, Inc. commenced litigation in
the Chancery Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, Second Judicial District,
against the Company, and James Edward Ernst, its
16
<PAGE> 21
Chief Executive Officer (collectively "Defendants"), seeking injunctive relief
and unspecified compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial as well
as punitive damages. plaintiff claims, among other things, that Defendants (i)
breached the terms of an agreement they had with Plaintiff, (ii) tortiously
interfered with certain business relations of plaintiff; and (iii) breached
covenants of good faith and fair dealing they allegedly owed to plaintiff. On or
about October 8, 1996, Defendants interposed an answer to plaintiff's complaint
denying the allegations contained in the complaint. The discovery phase of this
litigation is continuing and a trial date has been set for August 1998. While
the Company's management cannot predict the outcome of this action, management
believes plaintiff's claims are without merit and the Company intends to
vigorously defend this action.
TERMINATED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In April 1994, the Company entered into an agreement with the
Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe ("Tribe") to develop and manage a gaming casino on
tribal lands in northeastern South Dakota. The Company and Tribe subsequently
canceled the management agreement and entered into a consulting agreement, which
consulting agreement was terminated by the Tribe in January 1998. On October 20,
1994, International Gaming Network, Inc., commenced litigation against the
Company in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota,
Southern Division alleging, among other claims, that the Company intentionally
and improperly interfered with plaintiff's existing and prospective contractual,
economic or business relationship with the Tribe. On October 7, 1996, the United
States District Court filed a Judgment of Dismissal, dismissing all of
Plaintiff's claims, pursuant to a Motion for Summary Judgment which had been
brought by the Company. The Plaintiff appealed the dismissal of its claims to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. On July 17, 1997 the
Appellate Court affirmed the District Court's dismissal of the claim.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders
during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 1997.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock is traded over-the-counter and has been quoted
on the NASDAQ National Market since October 23, 1992, under the symbol CMAG. The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low per share
bid prices for the Company's common stock as quoted on the NASDAQ National
Market. The information set forth below was obtained from the NASDAQ National
Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 HIGH LOW
---- ------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Quarter 1............................................ $4.063 $2.750
Quarter 2............................................ $7.063 $3.875
Quarter 3............................................ $5.875 $3.625
Quarter 4............................................ $4.125 $2.156
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997
----
<S> <C> <C>
Quarter 1............................................ $3.000 $1.438
Quarter 2............................................ $1.875 $1.250
Quarter 3............................................ $2.438 $1.004
Quarter 4............................................ $2.375 $1.094
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE> 22
The last sales price for the Company's common stock as quoted on the NASDAQ
National Market as of the close of business on March 25, 1998 was $2.09375 per
share. The over-the-counter quotations above reflect inter-dealer prices,
without retail markup, markdown or commissions, and may not represent actual
transactions. There were approximately 1,293 shareholders owning the Company's
common stock of record as of the close of business March 25, 1998.
The Company has not paid any cash dividends with respect to its common
stock, and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The Company
intends to retain all earnings for the foreseeable future to fund the operation
and expansion of its business. The payment of any future dividends will be
determined by its Board of Directors in light of conditions then existing,
including the Company's earnings, financial condition and requirements,
restrictions in financing agreements, business conditions and other factors. The
indenture agreements covering both outstanding first mortgage notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $250,000,000 million, contain limitations on the
Company's ability to pay dividends.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Presented below are the selected consolidated financial data of Casino
Magic and its subsidiaries for the five years ended December 31, 1997 which has
been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Casino Magic
and its subsidiaries. This data has not been examined by the Company's
independent auditors, Arthur Andersen LLP. The selected consolidated financial
data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements,
related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual
Report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
1997(5) 1996(4) 1995(3) 1994(2) 1993(1)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA
Revenue................................ $261,474 $180,278 $177,723 $185,018 $202,404
Costs and Expenses..................... 236,919 171,435 172,952 173,786 136,996
Income (loss) from Operations.......... 24,555 8,843 4,771 11,232 65,408
Other Expenses......................... 30,335 45,109 18,293 14,450 5,677
Net Income (loss)...................... (5,249) (31,589) (10,292) (3,030) 38,506
Net Income (loss) Per Share............ (0.15) (0.89) (0.31) (0.10) 1.32
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
1997(5) 1996(4) 1995(3) 1994(2) 1993(1)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Working Capital (deficiency)........... $(11,290) $ (6,492) $ 15,910 $ 20,847 $ 50,021
Total Assets........................... 372,705 369,799 268,431 252,623 222,892
Current Liabilities (including
construction payables)............... 51,031 47,649 32,171 25,139 21,553
Long-term Debt, Net of Current
Maturities........................... 253,471 258,261 136,840 135,643 131,984
Shareholders' Equity................... 59,454 63,625 95,179 79,577 66,858
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Includes full years operations of Casino Magic-BSL, Casino Magic-South
Dakota and approximately seven months of operations of Casino Magic-Biloxi.
(2) Includes full years operations of Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi,
Casino Magic-South Dakota.
18
<PAGE> 23
(3) Includes full years operations of Casino Magic-BSL, Casino Magic-Biloxi and
Casino Magic-Neuquen, Casino Magic-South Dakota and seven and one half
months of operations for Casino Magic-Porto Carras, a 49% equity interest
of Casino Magic.
(4) Includes full years operations of Casino Magic-BSL, Casino Magic-Biloxi,
Casino Magic-Neuquen, 87 days of operations of Casino Magic-Bossier City,
six and one half months of operations of Casino Magic-South Dakota and nine
months of operations for Casino Magic-Porto Carras a 49% equity interest of
Casino Magic.
(5) Includes full years operations of Casino Magic-BSL, Casino Magic-Biloxi,
Casino Magic-Neuquen and Casino Magic-Bossier City,
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The discussions regarding proposed Company developments and operations
included in "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS" and "NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS" contain forward looking statements that involve a number of risks
and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to: (i) the opening
of a hotel in 1998 at Casino Magic-Biloxi; (ii) construction of the pavilion
expansion and hotel at Casino Magic-Bossier City; and (iii) the Company's
ability to fund planned developments and debt service obligations over the next
twelve months with currently available cash and marketable securities and with
cash flow from operations. Construction projects entail significant construction
risks, including, but not limited to, cost overruns, delay in receipt of
governmental approvals, shortages in materials or skilled labor, labor disputes,
unforeseen environmental or engineering problems, work stoppage, fire and other
natural disasters, construction scheduling problems and weather interferences,
any of which, if it occurred, could delay construction or result in a
substantial increase in costs to the Company. The Company's ability to meet its
consolidated debt obligations may be dependent upon the successful opening of
the hotel at Casino Magic-Biloxi and the other planned construction projects at
Casino Magic-Bossier City, and the Company's future operating performance, which
is itself dependent on a number of factors, such as, prevailing economic and
competitive conditions, regulatory compliance, and other factors affecting the
Company's operations and business, many of which are outside of the Company's
control. In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed above, other
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are detailed from
time to time in the Company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
PROPOSED MERGER
On February 19, 1998, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Hollywood Park, Inc. ("Hollywood"), and
Acquisition II, Inc. ("HP") a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hollywood. Under the
Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed, subject to approval of the Company's
shareholders, to merge (the "Merger") with HP. Upon such Merger, the Company
shall be the surviving entity and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Hollywood. Upon the Merger, the shareholders of the Company will be entitled to
receive $2.27 for each share of the Company's stock held.
The Merger is subject to the approval of the Company's shareholders prior
to October 31, 1998, and to the approval of the Mississippi Gaming Commission,
the Nevada Gaming Commission, and the Louisiana Gaming Control Board. The Merger
is also contingent upon other matters, including a requirement that neither the
Company nor Hollywood has materially breached any warranty, representation or
covenant contained in the Merger Agreement prior to the time of the Merger. If
the Merger Agreement is terminated for certain reasons, the Company will be
required to pay Hollywood $3,500,000.
The Merger Agreement restricts the ability of the Company to engage in
certain transactions prior to the time of the Merger, except those which are in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, unless the
Company obtains the consent of Hollywood. The Merger Agreement also imposes
limits on the capital expenditures and borrowing which the Company may effect,
which are not inconsistent with the
19
<PAGE> 24
Company's current plans. (See Note 8 of the Financial Statements for Change in
Control provisions relating to the Company's bond issues).
GENERAL
The Company commenced operations on the Gulf Coast of Mississippi in
September 1992 at Casino Magic-BSL. In 1993 the Company opened Casino
Magic-Biloxi; in 1995 the Company opened a gaming facility in Porto Carras,
Greece, (in which the Company had a 49% equity ownership): in 1995 the Company
opened two gaming facilities in the Province of Neuquen Argentina; and in 1996
the Company opened Casino Magic-Bossier City. Since its organization in 1992,
the Company owned and operated a small hotel/casino in Deadwood, South Dakota
("Goldiggers"), which was immaterial to the Company's business. Because of poor
operating performance, in 1996 the Company sold its gaming facilities in
Deadwood, South Dakota, and its 49% ownership in the gaming facility in Porto
Carras, Greece. In addition, the Company terminated all management operating
agreements in Greece.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain operating
information for the Company on a consolidated basis and for its existing
properties as of December 31, 1997. The principal operating entities are Casino
Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi, both dockside casinos operating on the Gulf
Coast of Mississippi ("Casino Magic-Gulf Coast"), Casino Magic-Bossier City, a
dockside casino in Northwest Louisiana and Casino Magic-Neuquen, which commenced
gaming operations at its two casinos in Neuquen and San Martin de los Andes,
Argentina, on January 1, 1995. The revenues, costs and expenses of Porto Carras
are not included below, as Porto Carras was accounted for under the equity
method of accounting.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Casino Magic-BSL(1)......................................... $ 88,414 $ 83,924 $ 87,534
Casino Magic-Biloxi(2)...................................... 62,310 63,876 72,737
Casino Magic-Bossier City(3)................................ 93,205 12,738 --
Casino Magic-Neuquen(4)..................................... 17,545 15,885 13,084
Corporate and Other(5)...................................... -- 3,855 4,368
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL REVENUES:............................................. $261,474 $180,278 $177,723
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Casino Magic-BSL(1)......................................... $ 71,927 $ 67,356 $ 71,356
Casino Magic-Biloxi(2)...................................... 58,096 56,983 59,882
Casino Magic-Bossier City(3)................................ 87,468 20,060 --
Casino Magic-Neuquen(4)..................................... 12,634 12,553 11,424
Corporate and Other(5)...................................... 6,794 14,483 30,290
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES:................................... $236,919 $171,435 $172,952
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS:
Casino Magic-BSL(1)......................................... $ 16,487 $ 16,568 $ 16,178
Casino Magic-Biloxi(2)...................................... 4,214 6,893 12,855
Casino Magic-Bossier City(3)................................ 5,737 (7,322) --
Casino Magic-Neuquen(4)..................................... 4,911 3,332 1,660
Corporate and Other(5)...................................... (6,794) (10,628) (25,922)
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL INCOME FROM OPERATIONS:............................... $ 24,555 $ 8,843 $ 4,771
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- ---------------
20
<PAGE> 25
(1) Began operations September 30, 1992; expanded casino capacity December 31,
1992.
(2) Began operations June 5, 1993; expanded casino capacity December 16, 1993.
(3) Began operations October 4, 1996; opened permanent facility on December 31,
1996.
(4) Began operations January 1, 1995.
(5) Includes management fees and royalty fees from Porto Carras which began
operations May 18, 1995. Equity in earnings with respect to Porto Carras was
reported as non-operating income. The Company ceased recording management
fees and royalty fees from Porto Carras on October 1, 1996.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Consolidated revenues increased $81.2 million, or 45.0%, to $261.5 in 1997
compared to $180.3 in 1996. The increase in 1997 consolidated revenues is
attributable to $93.2 million in revenues from Casino Magic-Bossier City, which
opened on October 4, 1996. Casino Magic-Bossier City revenues increased by $80.5
million in 1997 as compared to 1996. Casino Magic-Biloxi revenues declined $1.6
million, or 2.5%, from 1996 to 1997. This decline is primarily the result of
competition from other casinos with greater amenities than Casino Magic-Biloxi.
While competitive pressures will likely continue to adversely effect Casino
Magic-Biloxi's revenues and operating margins, management believes that the
hotel currently in the final stages of construction at Casino Magic-
Biloxi will help offset or reverse these declines in revenues. The opening
of the hotel at Casino Magic-Biloxi is expected in the second quarter of 1998.
Additionally, Casino Magic-Biloxi may experience reduced revenues in 1998 due to
customer inconveniences particularly those related to the construction of the
hotel entrance areas. However, Management will continue to take precautions to
minimize the impact of the construction on the customer. Other fluctuations in
revenues when comparing the periods ended December 31, 1997 to December 31, 1996
include: the loss of $3.1 million in royalties and management fees from Greece
in 1997 due to the termination of operations in Greece in December 1996; a loss
of $0.8 million in revenues as of the result of the sale of Goldiggers in June
1996; increased $4.5 million at Casino Magic-BSL as the result of increased
direct mail efforts and improved amenities, which include a golf course and
expanded buffet; and an increase in revenues at Casino Magic-Neuquen of $1.7
million attributable to the addition of seventy-five slot machines during the
latter half of 1997 and the continued popularity of slot machines at Casino
Magic-Neuquen.
Total operating expenses increased $65.5 million, or 38.2% to $236.9
million in 1997 compared to $171.4 million in 1996. Of this amount, $67.4
million is related to Casino Magic-Bossier City, which opened in October 1996
and the closure of Goldiggers in June 1996, which decreased operating expenses,
by $1.2 million. Excluding the effects of Casino Magic-Bossier City and
Goldiggers, operating costs in 1997 decreased by $0.7 million, or 0.5%, as
compared to operating costs in 1996. Although total operating expenses remained
flat between the comparable periods for 1997 and 1996 there are significant
fluctuations in various categories. Casino expenses increased by $4.0 million in
1997 as compared to 1996 as a result of increased costs associated increases in
player's club slot point redemption values, the increased use of complimentaries
in marketing efforts and increased gaming taxes due to increased revenues. Other
operating costs and expenses increased $1.0 million as a result of the opening
of a golf course at Casino Magic-BSL in February 1997. Advertising and marketing
expense increased by $2.3 million due to increased motorcoach based marketing
efforts at Casino Magic-Biloxi and the associated commission and giveaways
expenses. The increases in advertising and marketing costs are the results of
attempts to stabilize revenues in Biloxi and offset the effects of disruption
caused by the hotel construction. General and administrative costs decreased by
$2.7 million and are a result of cost containment efforts and staff reductions.
The majority of this decrease, $2.3 million was at the corporate management
level. Development expenses decreased by $1.2 million as a result of decreased
efforts to pursue new gaming opportunities. Depreciation expenses decreased by
$1.9 due to the sale of various assets held by Casino Magic including a jet
airplane and slot machines that were previously leased in Argentina. It is
anticipated that depreciation expense will increase after the opening of the
hotel in Biloxi.
21
<PAGE> 26
Consolidated "Other (income) expense" (non-operating income and expenses)
improved by $14.8 million, to net expense of $30.3 million in 1997, compared to
a net expense of $45.1 million in 1996. Approximately $27.0 million of the
additional expenses in 1996 were attributable to management's decision to write
off its 49% equity interest in a gaming facility in Porto Carras, Greece. Net
interest expense increased by $13.5 million in 1997 compared to the same period
in 1996. This was due to the increased debt from the issuance of the
$115,000,000, 13% Louisiana First Mortgage Notes by Casino Magic of Louisiana,
Corp. ( a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company ) in late August 1996, and a
reduction of $3.7 million in capitalized interest due to the completion of the
Casino Magic-Bossier City facility and the golf course at Casino Magic-Casino
Magic-BSL. Other income increased by $2.3 million in 1997 compared to the same
period in 1996 due to a gain on the sale of the Crescent City Riverboat and the
gain on the sale of a 49% interest in Casino Magic-Neuquen.
The Company's effective tax rates for 1997 and 1996 of approximately
(33.5%) and (12.9%), respectively, are the result of an allowance against
deferred tax assets. This allowance reduces net deferred tax assets to
approximately zero.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Consolidated revenues increased $2.6 million, or 1.4%, to $180.3 in 1996
compared to $177.7 in 1995. The increase in 1996 consolidated revenues is
attributable to $12.7 million in revenues from Casino Magic-Bossier City, which
opened using a temporary facility on October 4, 1996 and increased revenues from
Casino Magic-Neuquen of $2.8 million, or 21.4%. The majority of the increase in
revenues at Casino Magic-Neuquen is attributable to increased slot machine
revenues of $3.4 million. Slot machine revenues increased in 1996 compared to
the same period in 1995 due to an increase in the number of slot machines at
Casino Magic-Neuquen from 89 to 400 in May 1995. Additional increases resulted
from increased customer counts and their influence on food and beverage
revenues. These increases in revenues at Casino Magic-Neuquen were partially
offset by declining table games revenues. These increase in consolidated
revenues where offset by reduced revenues at Casino Magic-BSL, Casino
Magic-Biloxi and the loss of approximately six months revenues from the sale of
a gaming facility in Deadwood, South Dakota, which the Company sold in June
1996. Casino Magic-Biloxi revenues declined $8.9 million, or 12.2%, from 1995 to
1996. This decline is primarily the result of adjacent hotel/casino operations
on both sides of Casino Magic-Biloxi, which have significantly greater amenities
than Casino Magic-Biloxi. While competitive pressures will likely continue to
adversely effect Casino Magic-Biloxi's revenues and operating margins,
management believes that the hotel scheduled to open in 1998 at Casino
Magic-Biloxi will help offset or reverse these declines in revenues. Management
believes that combination of construction disruption caused by the development
of a new buffet and kitchen and increased overall competition in the Gulf Coast
and New Orleans markets, both of which Casino Magic-BSL competes in, contributed
significantly to the $3.6 million, or 4.1%, decline in revenues at Casino
Magic-BSL. The loss of $1.4 million in corporate and other revenues is due to
the June 1996 sale of a gaming facility located in Deadwood, South Dakota.
Although royalty and management fee revenues increased by $0.9 million, or
39.3%, to $3.1 million in 1996, the Company has divested itself of all
operations in Greece during 1996 where the majority of all royalties and
management fee revenues where generated.
Total operating costs and expenses were down $1.5 million, or 1.0%, in 1996
compared to 1995. Casino expenses increased $5.3 million, or 7.6%, during the
same period principally as a result of the Company opening a new gaming facility
in Bossier City, Louisiana, which had $7.1 million in casino expenses in 1996.
This increase in casino expenses relating to Casino Magic-Bossier City was
offset by reduced expenses at Casino Magic-Biloxi as a result of reduced
revenues, and the sale of the Company's gaming facility at Deadwood, South
Dakota in June 1996. Food and beverage costs increased $0.6 million, or 8.1%, as
a result of increased customer traffic at Casino Magic-Neuquen. Casino
Magic-Neuquen relies on its food and beverage facilities at the casino to
promote casino operations. Other operating costs and expenses increased $1.5
million, or 110.5%, to $2.8 million in 1996 compared to 1995. This increase is
the result of additions to amenities at Casino Magic-BSL, and the transfer of
the gift shop operations at Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi from a
third party to the Company. During 1996, Casino Magic-BSL added amenities
relating to the Arnold Palmer designed golf course, such as the pro shop, the
Arnold Palmer Golf Academy and the
22
<PAGE> 27
groundskeeping department. In addition, Casino Magic-BSL began operating a
child-care facility for casino patrons in 1996. Advertising and marketing
expenses decreased by $5.0 million, or 19.2%, in 1996 as compared to 1995. This
decrease in 1996 is the result of several factors: a reduction in the use of air
charters to attract customers; the use of more cost efficient promotions
concerning giveaways through the Magic Money Players Club Card; and an overall
reduction in marketing and advertising costs. This decrease was partially offset
by the opening of Casino Magic-Bossier City, in October 1996.
General and administrative expenses decreased $4.3 million, or 15.0%, in
1996 as compared to the same period of 1995. The decline is a result of cost
reduction measures implemented in early 1996, including the elimination of
several corporate officer positions. Property operation, maintenance and energy
costs increased $3.4 million, or 83.2%, in 1996 as compared to 1995 as the
result of the addition of Casino Magic-Bossier City, the continued aging of the
facilities at Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi which required more
maintenance costs in 1996, and the addition of the golf facility at Casino
Magic-BSL in 1996. Rents, property taxes and insurance costs increased by $1.7
million, or 38.9%, in 1996 as compared to 1995. The increase is in part a result
of the addition of Casino Magic-Bossier City. Depreciation and amortization
increased $2.6 million, or 16.3%, in 1996 as compared to the same period in
1995. This increase is due to the addition of tangible depreciable property, the
amortization of the investment costs in excess of equity interest in the 49%
owned Greek gaming facility which was amortized for 105 days in 1995 and for
nine months in 1996, and a change in 1996 in the method used to amortize the
Company's land option deposits over the life of the option. During 1996,
management wrote-off the excess of equity interest in the Greek gaming facility.
Furthermore, the addition of Casino Magic-Bossier City increased depreciation
expense, while the divesting of the Company's gaming facility in Deadwood, South
Dakota, decreased depreciation expense. Preopening costs increased by $4.7
million, or 260.0%, in 1996 from 1995. This is a result of the opening of Casino
Magic-Bossier City in October 1996. In 1995 the Company opened the Greek gaming
facility in which it had a 49% ownership.
Consolidated other (income) expense (non-operating income and expenses)
increased $26.8 million from a net expense of $18.3 million in 1995 to a net
expense of $45.1 million in 1996. Of this increase, $26.1 million, is due to the
Company's decision to write off its investment in a gaming facility in Porto
Carras, Greece, ("Porto Carras") where the Company had a 49% equity interest.
Management's decision was based on the results from the Company's Greek gaming
facilities after the opening of a competing casino. In September 1996, Hyatt
Corporation opened a new casino in the City of Thessaloniki, Porto Carras's
primary market. Although the Company anticipated some revenue loss as a result
of this increased competition, the actual effects were greater than anticipated
and resulted in a $2.0 million loss in operations at Porto Carras for the month
of September 1996. Despite new marketing and cost containment efforts, these
losses continued. Furthermore, the majority owner in the Porto Carras venture
was unwilling or unable to advance any funds to the operation, informed the
Company that it did not intend to operate a substantial portion of the Porto
Carras resort area, consisting of two hotels and amenities, during the 1997
season. These factors, among others, led to the Company's decision to write off
its investment in Porto Carras and led to the sale of Porto Carras in December
1996 for a nominal amount. Net interest expense (interest expense less
capitalized interest and interest income) increased $2.1 million from 1995 to
1996. The increase reflects the cost of funding the development of Casino
Magic-Bossier City. In August 1996, the Company, through a wholly owned
subsidiary, issued $115 million in first mortgage notes to fund Casino
Magic-Bossier City. In 1995, the Company expensed capitalized costs relating to
development joint ventures in the amount of $2.2 million. In 1996, no such
expense was incurred.
The Company's effective tax rate for 1996 of approximately (13.0%) is the
result of an allowance against deferred tax assets of approximately $8.2
million. This valuation allowance was recorded in recognition of the Company's
recent operating results. The effective tax rate for 1995 of (24.0%) is due to
significant permanent tax differences.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At December 31, 1997, the Company had unrestricted cash of $20.9 million
compared to unrestricted cash of $17.6 million at December 31, 1996. At December
31, 1997, the Company also had restricted cash and
23
<PAGE> 28
marketable securities of $10.7 million all of which came from the sale of the
Crescent City Riverboat (see discussion below). The Company had $17.0 million in
restricted cash relating to the $115 million, 13% Louisiana First Mortgage Notes
at December 31, 1996. For the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company
generated $23.8 million of cash flow from operating activities and received $6.4
million of proceeds from the issuance of debt. During 1997 the Company spent
$37.1 million for acquisitions of property, equipment and reduced debt by $12.1
million.
Of the $37.1 million spent, approximately $28.6 million was expended in
capital improvements at Casino Magic-Gulf Coast, and $7.2 million in capital
expenditures at Casino Magic-Bossier City. The Company plans additional capital
improvements at Casino Magic-Gulf Coast and Casino Magic-Bossier City, much of
which is subject to cash flows generated by the Company's operations, and the
availability of financing. There are no assurances that adequate funding will be
available for these planned improvements.
The Company opened Casino Magic-Bossier City on October 4, 1996 using a
temporary boarding facility, and on December 31, 1996, opened the permanent
facility. The Company plans to expand the land based pavilion and construct a
188-room convention hotel, including restaurants, and a swimming pool. The
construction of the hotel is expected to be funded primarily by the $11.7
million in proceeds received from the sale of the Crescent City Riverboat and
the future operating cash flow of Casino Magic-Bossier City. No assurances can
be given that the proceeds from the sale of the Crescent City Riverboat and the
cash flow from the operations of Casino Magic-Bossier City will be sufficient to
complete such hotel and related facilities or that these improvements will ever
be developed.
The Company is near completion of a hotel at Casino Magic-Biloxi above the
eight-story parking garage adjacent to the casino. The hotel consists of
approximately 378 rooms, including 86 suites, and will include a health spa,
beauty salon, swimming pool and conference space. for the hotel is scheduled to
open in the second quarter 1998. The hotel construction costs have been funded
out of the cash flow of Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi, and the $7.0
million in proceeds from the sale of a 49% ownership interest in Casino
Magic-Neuquen. The Company has obtained debt financing of the furniture,
fixtures and equipment for the Casino Magic-Biloxi hotel in the amount of $6.5
million.
Under the terms of the Indenture associated with the $135,000,000 First
Mortgage Notes, Casino Magic Corp., Mardi Gras Casino Corp., Biloxi Casino Corp.
and Casino Magic Finance Corp. have certain restrictions relative to additional
borrowings and guarantees. Jefferson Casino Corporation and Casino Magic of
Louisiana, Corp. have certain restrictions relative to additional borrowings and
cash flow under the terms of the Louisiana Indenture associated with the
$115,000,000 First Mortgage Notes.
The Company commenced operations in 1995 outside the United States becoming
subject to certain risks including foreign currency exchange, repatriation of
earnings and profits, and adverse foreign tax treatment. In addition, the
Company will incur the general business risk associated with operating in
foreign county where culture and business practices may vary significantly from
that in the United States. Such risks could have a material impact on the
operating results and liquidity of the Company. The Company will have a
significant need for cash in 1998 and beyond in order to continue its planned
development of its existing properties. The Company believes that cash and
marketable securities at December 31, 1997, and cash flows from operations will
be sufficient to service its operating and debt service requirements, through at
least the next twelve months, including the opening of the 378 room hotel and
the completion of other planned improvements at Casino Magic-Biloxi and the
construction of the Casino Magic-Bossier City hotel, but are not anticipated to
be sufficient to engage in any other development activities.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The consolidated financial statements of Casino Magic and subsidiaries and
the notes thereto are attached to this Annual Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
24
<PAGE> 29
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The discussion under the section captioned "Proposal No. 1 -- ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS" to be included in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and delivered to the
Registrant's shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Regulation 14A"), with respect to
the 1998 annual meeting of shareholders of the Registrant ("1998 Shareholders
Meeting") is incorporated by reference in response to this Item 10.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The discussion under the section captioned "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION" but
excluding the discussions contained in the subsections captioned "EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION -- Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation" and
"EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION -- Performance Graph", to be included in the
Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC and delivered
to the Registrant's shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A with respect to the
1998 Shareholders Meeting is incorporated by reference in response to Item 11.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The discussion under the section captioned "PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS" to be
included in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC
and delivered to the Registrant's shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A with
respect to the 1998 Shareholders Meeting is incorporated by reference in
response to Item 12.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The discussion under the section captioned "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS" to be
included in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC
and delivered to the Registrant's shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A with
respect to the 1998 Shareholders Meeting is incorporated by reference in
response to Item 13.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A)1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
Independent Auditors' Report of Arthur Andersen LLP.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996.
Consolidated Statements of Operations -- years ended December 31, 1997,
1996, and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity -- years ended December 31,
1997, 1995, and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- years ended December 31, 1997,
1996, and 1995.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(A) 2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES OF CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required,
or the information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of
Casino Magic Corp. and its subsidiaries.
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were been filed during the fourth quarter of the
year ended December 31, 1997.
25
<PAGE> 30
A report on Form 8-K was filed on March 4, 1998 relating to the proposed
merger with Hollywood Park Inc.
(C) EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
3(i)(a)(1) Articles of Incorporation of Casino Magic Corp.
3(i)(b)(2) Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Casino
Magic Corp.
3(ii)(a)(1) By-Laws of Casino Magic Corp. as amended.
3(ii)(b)(8) Amendment dated April 4, 1995 to the By-Laws of Casino Magic
Corp.
3(ii)(c)(11) Amendment dated August 11, 1995 to the By-Laws of Casino
Magic Corp.
4.1(4) Form of Certificate for Common Stock of Casino Magic Corp.
4.2(3) Form of 11.5% First Mortgage Note due 2001 Series B.
4.3(2) Indenture Dated October 14, 1993 among Casino Magic Finance
Corp., Casino Magic Corp., and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust
Company (Without Exhibits).
4.4 Deleted
4.5 Deleted
4.6(5) Form of Warrant issued to Summit Investment Corporation and
related persons for the purchase of an aggregate of
1,110,000 shares of Common Stock.
4.7(5) Indenture dated as of May 13, 1996, $35,000,000 11 1/2%
Senior Secured Notes due 1999.
4.8(14) Form of Casino Magic of Louisiana Corp.'s ("Louisiana Corp")
13% First Mortgage Notes due 2003 with Contingent Interest
in the aggregate principal amount of $115,000,000.
4.9(14) Form of Guarantee issued on August 22, 1996 by Jefferson
Casino Corporation.
4.10(14) Indenture dated as of August 22, 1996 by and among Louisiana
Corp, First Union Bank of Connecticut, as Trustee, and the
Guarantors named therein, for Louisiana Corp.'s $115,000,000
of 13% First Mortgage Notes due 2003 with Contingent
Interest.
4.11(14) Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 22, 1996 by
and among Louisiana Corp, the Guarantors named therein and
the Initial Purchasers named therein.
4.12(14) Cash Collateral and Disbursement Agreement dated August 22,
1996 by and among Louisiana Corp, First Union Bank of
Connecticut, as Trustee, and First National Bank of
Commerce, as disbursement agent.
4.13(14) Security Agreement dated as of August 12, 1996 by and
between First Union Bank of Connecticut, as Trustee, and
Louisiana Corp, as Guarantor.
4.14(14) Stock Pledge dated as of August 22, 1996 by and between
First Union Bank of Connecticut, as Trustee, and Jefferson
Casino Corporation, as Pledgor.
4.15(14) Security Agreements dated as of August 22, 1996 by and
between First Union Bank of Connecticut, as Trustee, and
Jefferson Casino Corporation.
4.16(14) First Preferred Ship Mortgages dated as of August 22, 1996
executed in favor of First Union Bank of Connecticut, as
Trustee, by Louisiana Corp.
4.17(14) First Preferred Ship Mortgages dated as of August 22, 1996
executed in favor of First Union Bank of Connecticut, as
Trustee, by Louisiana Corp.
4.18(14) Mortgage of Louisiana Corp. dated as of August 22, 1996
executed in favor of First Union Bank of Connecticut, as
Trustee.
4.19(14) Cash Collateral and Disbursement Agreement.
4.20(14) Form of Accounts Pledge Agreement.
4.21(14) Note Purchase Agreement dated August 16, 1996.
4.22(14) Collateral Assignment dated August 22, 1996.
10.1(1)* Employment Agreement dated June 1, 1992 between Marlin F.
Torguson and Casino Magic Corp., and Amendment No. 1 thereto
dated August 26, 1992.
10.2(7)* Amendment No. 2 dated August 26, 1994 to Employment
Agreement between Marlin F. Torguson and Casino Magic Corp.
10.3 Deleted
</TABLE>
26
<PAGE> 31
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.4 Deleted
10.5 Deleted
10.6(a)(1)* Incentive Stock Option Plan.
10.6(b)(2)* Amendment adopted on May 13, 1993 to Incentive Stock Option
Plan.
10.6(c)(2)* Amendment adopted on May 14, 1993 to Incentive Stock Option
Plan.
10.7(1) Lease Agreement dated April 4, 1992 between G & W
Enterprises, Inc. and Biloxi Casino Corp.
10.8 Deleted
10.11 Deleted
10.12(2) Public Trust Tidelands Lease dated May 27, 1993 between
Biloxi Casino Corp. and the State of Mississippi.
10.13(2) Lease Agreement dated November 23, 1992 between Gary
Gollott, Tommy Gollott and Tyrone Gollott, and Biloxi Casino
Corp.
10.14(2) Promissory Note dated October 14, 1993 in the principal sum
of $67,500,000 issued by Mardi Gras Casino Corp. in favor of
Casino Magic Finance Corp.
10.15(2) Promissory Note dated October 14, 1993 in the principal sum
of $67,500,000 issued by Biloxi Casino Corp. in favor of
Casino Magic Finance Corp.
10.16(2) Guaranty dated October 14, 1993 by Mardi Gras Casino Corp.
of Biloxi Casino Corp. Note.
10.17(2) Guaranty dated October 14, 1993 by Biloxi Casino Corp. of
Mardi Gras Casino Corp. Note.
10.18(2) First and Second Deeds of Trust dated October 14, 1993 by
Mardi Gras Casino Corp. in favor of Casino Magic Finance
Corp.
10.19(2) First and Second Deeds of Trust dated October 14, 1993 by
Biloxi Casino Corp. in favor of Casino Magic Finance Corp.
10.20(2) First and Second Leasehold Deeds of Trust dated October 14,
1993 for G&W Lease.
10.21(2) First and Second Leasehold Deeds of Trust dated October 14,
1993 for Gollott Lease.
10.22(2) First and Second Leasehold Deeds of Trust dated October 14,
1993 for State of Mississippi Lease.
10.23(2) Assignments of Deeds of Trust dated October 14, 1993.
10.24(2) Pledge and Security Agreement I & II dated October 14, 1993
of Mardi Gras Casino Corp.
10.25(2) Pledge and Security Agreement I & II dated October 14, 1993
of Biloxi Casino Corp.
10.26(2) Assignment and Pledge Agreement dated October 14, 1993 of
Casino Magic Finance Corp.
10.27 Deleted
10.28 Deleted
10.29 Deleted
10.30 Deleted
10.31 Deleted
10.32(4) Option Agreement dated March 2, 1994 between Anthony's
Hawthorne, Inc. and Boston Casino Corp.
10.33(4) Option Mortgage dated March 2, 1994 by Anthony's Hawthorne,
Inc. in favor of Boston Casino Corp.
10.34(4) Guaranty dated March 2, 1994 by Casino Magic Corp. in favor
of Anthony's Hawthorne, Inc.
10.35(4) Option Agreement dated July 2, 1993 between Atlantic Land
Corp. and Casino Magic Corp. to acquire real estate located
in Mobile, Alabama.
10.36(4) Option Agreement dated July 13, 1993 between Marshall J.
Demouy and Edward F. Murray, Jr., as Trustees and Casino
Magic Corp. to acquire real estate located in Mobile,
Alabama.
</TABLE>
27
<PAGE> 32
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.37(4) Option Agreement dated July 13, 1993 between Marshall J.
Demouy and Edward F. Murray, Jr., as Trustees and Casino
Magic Corp. to acquire real estate located in Mobile,
Alabama.
10.38(4) Option to Lease Real Estate dated December 11, 1993 between
Opportunity Options, Inc. and Casino Magic Corp. to lease
real estate located in Crawford County, Indiana.
10.39 Deleted
10.40 Deleted
10.41 Deleted
10.42 Deleted
10.43 Deleted
10.44(6)* Employment Agreement dated September 1, 1994 between Robert
A. Callaway and Casino Magic Corp.
10.45 Deleted
10.46 Deleted
10.47 Deleted
10.48 Deleted
10.49 Deleted
10.50(7) Concession Contract for the Management, Operation,
Maintenance and Related Services of the Gaming Houses of the
Provincial Casino in the Cities of Neuquen and San Martin De
Los Andes dated December 21, 1994 between the Province of
Neuquen and Casino Magic Neuquen, S.A. (English
translation).
10.51 Deleted
10.52(7) Option Agreement dated February 14, 1995 among Estate of
Janice Small, Ronald W. Brewer, executor, and Casino Magic
Corp. for real estate in Crawford County, Indiana.
10.53(7) Option Agreement dated January 11, 1994 between Terry Roser
and Eddie P. Roser (collectively) and Casino Magic Corp. for
real estate in Crawford County, Indiana.
10.54 Deleted
10.55 Deleted
10.56(7) Consulting Agreement between Casino Magic Corp. and National
Gaming Consultants, Inc. dated January 15, 1994.
10.57 Deleted
10.58 Deleted
10.59 Deleted
10.60 Deleted
10.61 Deleted
10.62 Deleted
10.63 Deleted
10.64(7) Option Agreement dated January 11, 1994 between Tower
Orchards, Inc. and Casino Magic Corp. for real estate in
Crawford County, Indiana.
10.65 Deleted
10.66 Deleted
10.67 Deleted
10.68 Deleted
10.69 Deleted
10.70 Deleted
10.71 Deleted
10.72 Deleted
10.73 Deleted
10.74 Deleted
10.75 Deleted
10.76 Deleted
</TABLE>
28
<PAGE> 33
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.77(9) Extension of Exclusive Option to Purchase dated June 26,
1995 between Atlantic Land Corp. and Casino Magic Corp. to
acquire real estate located in Mobile, Alabama.
10.78(9) Registration Agreement dated June 26, 1995 between Atlantic
Land Corp. and Casino Magic Corp.
10.79(9) Stock Option Agreement dated June 26, 1995 between Atlantic
Land Corp. and Casino Magic Corp.
10.80* Deleted
10.81(10)* Employment Agreement dated October 2, 1995 between the
Company and Jay S. Osman
10.82(10) Lease Agreement dated September 29, 1995 between the Company
and the State of Mississippi
10.83 Deleted
10.84 Deleted
10.85 Deleted
10.86 Deleted
10.87 Deleted
10.88 Deleted
10.89 Deleted
10.90 Deleted
10.91 Deleted
10.92(11* Employment Agreement between Casino Magic Corp. and James E.
Ernst dated December 20, 1995.
10.93 Deleted
10.94 Deleted
10.95(11) Purchase Agreement between Casino Magic Corp., Jefferson
Casino Corporation, C-M of Louisiana, Inc. and Capital
Gaming International, Inc. dated February 21, 1996.
[CRESCENT CITY].
10.96(11) Amendment to an option agreement between Boston Casino Corp.
and Anthony's Hawthorne, Inc. dated January 22, 1996.
10.97* Deleted
10.98(11) Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement dated December 20, 1995
between James E. Ernst and Casino Magic Corp.
10.99 Deleted
10.100 Deleted
10.101 Deleted
10.102 Deleted
10.103(13) Loan Participation Agreement dated June 28, 1996 by and
between BNC National Bank and Casino Magic American Corp.
10.104(16)* Deleted
10.105 Deleted
10.106 Deleted
10.107(16) Agreement dated December 12, 1996 among Touristiki Georgiki
Exagogiki, S.A., Parral Compania Naviera, S.A., Casino Magic
(Europe) B.V., Casino Magic Hellas Management Services S.A.
and Casino Magic Corp. relating to the termination of Joint
Venture Agreement and the Management Agreement between the
parties.
10.108(16) Agreement dated December 12, 1996 among Touristiki Georgiki
Exagogiki, S.A., Parral Compania Naviera, S.A., Casino Magic
(Europe) B.V., Casino Magic Hellas Management Services S.A.,
Casino Magic Corp. and Murbec Inc. relating to the purchase
of Porto Carras Casino S.A.
10.109(16) Amendment to Operating Agreement of Kansas Gaming Partners,
L.L.C. dated January 22, 1997.
10.110(17) Purchase agreement for sale of Registrant's 49% interest in
Casino Magic Neuquen, S.A. to Crown Casino Corp.
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE> 34
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.111(17) Purchase agreement for sale of Crescent City Queen riverboat
to Hollywood Park, Inc. for $11.7 million.
10.112(18) Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 19, 1997,
between Casino Magic Corp. Hollywood Park, Inc. and HP
Acquisition II, Inc.
10.113* Change in Control Severance Plan for Officers and Casino
Managers effective 1/23/98
10.114* Employment Agreement dated June 3, 1997 between Ken Schultz
and Casino Magic Corp.
23.1 Consent of Independent Public Accountants.
27. Financial Data Schedule (filed electronically only).
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* Indicates management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements.
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement (No.
33-51438) on Form S-1 dated August 28, 1992.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement (No.
33-71572) on Form S-4 dated November 12, 1993.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement (No. 33-71572) on Form S-4 dated February 3, 1994.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement (No. 33-51438) on Form S-1 dated October 21, 1992.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 1994.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1994.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 1995.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 1995.
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 1995.
(11) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 1995.
(12) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 1996.
(13) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 1996.
(14) Incorporated by reference to Casino Magic of Louisiana Corp. Registration
Statement (No. 333-14535) on Form S-4 dated October 21, 1996.
(15) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed May 28, 1996.
(16) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 1996.
30
<PAGE> 35
(17) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 1997
(18) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Report on Form 8-K filed March 4,
1998
(D) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REQUIRED BY REGULATION S-X WHICH ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS.
None.
31
<PAGE> 36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
Dated: March 30, 1998
By: /s/ JAMES E. ERNST
--------------------------------------
James E. Ernst
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ MARLIN F. TORGUSON Chairman of the Board March 30, 1998
- ---------------------------------------------
Marlin F. Torguson
/s/ JAMES E. ERNST President and Chief March 30, 1998
- --------------------------------------------- Executive Officer
James E. Ernst (principal executive officer)
/s/ JAY S. OSMAN Chief Financial Officer and March 30, 1998
- --------------------------------------------- Treasurer (principal financial and
Jay S. Osman accounting officer)
/s/ ROGER H. FROMMELT Director March 30, 1998
- ---------------------------------------------
Roger H. Frommelt
/s/ E. THOMAS WELCH Director March 30, 1998
- ---------------------------------------------
E. Thomas Welch
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE> 37
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................... F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations....................... F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets................................. F-4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity............. F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows....................... F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-9
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE> 38
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of Casino Magic Corp.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Casino
Magic Corp. (a Minnesota corporation) and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Casino Magic Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
February 27, 1998
F-2
<PAGE> 39
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Casino........................................... $246,320,048 $167,153,012 $165,997,836
Food, beverage and rooms......................... 10,784,762 8,080,067 8,392,529
Royalty and management fees...................... -- 3,099,407 2,224,351
Other operating revenues......................... 4,369,206 1,945,357 1,108,049
------------ ------------ ------------
261,474,016 180,277,843 177,722,765
------------ ------------ ------------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Casino........................................... 118,467,492 74,943,304 69,654,888
Food and beverage................................ 10,756,505 7,351,838 6,795,164
Rooms............................................ 639,778 1,039,081 1,224,685
Other operating costs and expenses............... 4,292,276 2,807,038 1,333,183
Advertising and marketing........................ 36,427,434 20,901,821 25,873,832
General and administrative....................... 26,425,200 24,216,613 28,501,308
Property operation, maintenance and energy
cost.......................................... 11,210,297 7,433,262 4,057,144
Rents, property taxes and insurance.............. 7,891,199 5,991,261 4,314,355
Depreciation and amortization.................... 20,246,663 18,346,202 15,768,546
Preopening expenses.............................. -- 6,554,535 1,818,715
Development expenses............................. 562,419 1,849,583 2,228,549
Write-off capitalized costs relating to inactive
developments.................................. -- -- 11,381,945
------------ ------------ ------------
236,919,263 171,434,538 172,952,314
------------ ------------ ------------
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS............................. 24,554,753 8,843,305 4,770,451
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:
Interest expense................................. 34,723,613 25,071,767 17,436,904
Interest capitalized............................. (1,963,955) (5,717,494) (867,236)
Interest income.................................. (1,375,100) (1,436,468) (803,624)
Loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries............ 505,424 26,501,808 112,250
Write-off of capitalized costs primarily relating
to joint ventures............................. -- -- 2,210,219
Other............................................ (1,555,201) 689,221 204,981
------------ ------------ ------------
30,334,781 45,108,834 18,293,494
------------ ------------ ------------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY
INTEREST IN INCOME OF SUBSIDIARY................. (5,780,028) (36,265,529) (13,523,043)
INCOME TAX BENEFIT................................. (1,935,000) (4,676,182) (3,230,864)
MINORITY INTEREST.................................. 1,404,180 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
NET LOSS........................................... $ (5,249,208) $(31,589,347) $(10,292,179)
============ ============ ============
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic............................................ $ (0.15) $ (0.89) $ (0.31)
============ ============ ============
Diluted.......................................... $ (0.15) $ (0.89) $ (0.31)
============ ============ ============
AVERAGE SHARES AND EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING:
Basic............................................ 35,662,616 35,448,068 33,260,904
============ ============ ============
Diluted.......................................... 35,662,616 35,448,068 33,260,904
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE> 40
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1997 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 20,901,510 $ 17,561,512
Restricted Cash........................................... 85,000 16,984,654
Restricted Marketable Securities.......................... 10,629,405 --
Prepaid expenses.......................................... 3,330,041 2,844,995
Notes and accounts receivable, net........................ 3,781,945 2,889,486
Other current assets...................................... 1,012,886 873,676
------------ ------------
Total current assets.................................... 39,740,787 41,154,323
------------ ------------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET................................. 263,993,452 243,692,571
------------ ------------
OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS:
Notes receivable.......................................... 3,385,198 4,119,700
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries................ 713,035 957,831
Options and land deposits................................. -- 2,282,244
Foreign casino concession agreement, net of accumulated
amortization of $2,846,685 in 1997 and $1,897,790 in
1996.................................................... 8,540,055 9,488,950
Deferred gaming license cost, net of accumulated
amortization of $2,013,838 in 1997 and $395,489 in
1996.................................................... 38,048,426 38,337,333
Property held for development............................. 525,000 3,040,357
Property held for sale.................................... 5,606,265 15,108,541
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of
$4,289,382 in 1997 and $2,506,133 in 1996............... 8,957,645 10,195,688
Deposits and other........................................ 3,194,954 1,421,979
------------ ------------
Total other long-term assets............................ 68,970,578 84,952,623
------------ ------------
$372,704,817 $369,799,517
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Notes and contracts payable............................... $ 305,925 $ 4,708,603
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... 8,590,945 4,648,638
Accounts Payable.......................................... 9,323,949 7,945,068
Accrued Expenses.......................................... 11,522,887 11,320,101
Accrued Interest.......................................... 9,783,784 8,830,040
Accrued payroll and related benefits...................... 7,719,441 8,341,720
Accrued progressive gaming liabilities.................... 1,445,257 1,121,623
Other current liabilities................................. 2,338,909 731,018
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities............................... 51,031,097 47,646,811
------------ ------------
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES....................................... -- 266,761
------------ ------------
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES AND MINORITY INTEREST........... 8,748,212 --
------------ ------------
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES................... 253,471,219 258,261,231
------------ ------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock, $0.01 par, 50,000,000 shares, authorized
35,722,124 issued and outstanding in 1997 and 35,637,083
in 1996 issued and outstanding.......................... 357,221 356,371
Undesignated stock, 2,500,000 shares authorized, none
issued.................................................. -- --
Additional paid-in capital................................ 67,122,852 67,123,702
Retained earnings (deficit)............................... (7,762,270) (2,513,062)
Unrealized holding loss on securities..................... -- (850,156)
Less unearned compensation................................ (263,514) (492,141)
------------ ------------
Total shareholders' equity.............................. 59,454,289 63,624,714
------------ ------------
$372,704,817 $369,799,517
============ ============
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE> 41
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK FOREIGN
---------------------- ADDITIONAL CURRENCY
SHARES AMOUNT PAID-IN CAPITAL ADJUSTMENT
---------- ------ --------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994................... 29,961,750 $299,618 $41,127,168 --
Amortization of unearned compensation........ -- -- -- --
Write-off of unearned compensation........... -- -- (1,642,886) --
Stock options granted to executive
officers.................................. -- -- 101,563 --
Vested stock grants to executive officers.... 16,250 162 (162) --
Net proceeds from exercise of employee stock
options................................... 308,564 3,086 376,726 --
Net proceeds from common stock issued
pursuant to Reg. S........................ 1,771,000 17,710 8,303,095 --
Stock issued for consultants' compensation... 12,000 120 63,632 --
Stock issued for land........................ 3,210,000 32,100 17,758,277 --
Foreign currency translation................. -- -- -- (224,195)
Net loss..................................... -- -- -- --
---------- -------- ----------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995................... 35,279,564 $352,796 $66,087,413 (224,195)
Amortization of unearned compensation........ -- -- -- --
Stock options granted to executive
officers.................................. -- -- 567,188 --
Net proceeds from exercise of warrants....... -- -- 500
Net proceeds from exercise of employee and
non-employee director stock options....... 357,519 3,575 453,654 --
Casino One Corp. acquisition................. -- -- 14,947 --
Unrealized Holding Loss on Securities
Available for Sale........................ -- -- -- --
Foreign currency translation adjustment...... -- -- -- 224,195
Net loss..................................... -- -- -- --
---------- -------- ----------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996................... 35,637,083 $356,371 $67,123,702 --
Amortization of unearned compensation........
Vested stock grants to executive officers
Available for Sale........................ 85,041 850 (850)
Loss on Securities...........................
Net loss.....................................
---------- -------- ----------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1997................... 35,722,124 $357,221 $67,122,852 --
========== ======== =========== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE> 42
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED
HOLDING LOSS RETAINED LESS
ON SECURITIES (DEFICIT) EARNED
AVAILABLE FOR SALE EARNINGS COMPENSATION TOTAL
------------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994........... -- $39,368,464 $(1,218,751) $ 79,576,499
Amortization of unearned
compensation...................... -- -- 470,962 470,962
Write-off of unearned compensation... -- -- 735,819 (907,067)
Stock options granted to executive
officers.......................... -- -- (101,563) --
Vested stock grants to executive
officers.......................... -- -- -- --
Net proceeds from exercise of
employee stock options............ -- -- -- 379,812
Net proceeds from common stock issued
pursuant to Reg. S................ -- -- -- 8,320,805
Stock issued for consultants'
compensation...................... -- -- -- 63,752
Stock issued for land................ -- -- -- 17,790,377
Foreign currency translation......... -- -- -- (224,195)
Net loss............................. -- (10,292,179) -- (10,292,179)
---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995........... -- $29,076,285 $ (113,533) $ 95,178,766
Amortization of unearned
compensation...................... -- -- 188,580 188,580
Stock options granted to executive
officers.......................... -- -- (567,188) --
Net proceeds from exercise of
warrants.......................... -- -- -- 500
Net proceeds from exercise of
employee and non-employee director
stock options..................... -- -- -- 457,229
Casino One Corp. acquisition......... -- -- -- 14,947
Unrealized Holding Loss on Securities
Available for Sale................ (850,156) -- -- (850,156)
Foreign currency translation
adjustment........................ -- -- -- 224,195
Net loss............................. (31,589,347) (31,589,347)
---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996........... (850,156) $(2,513,062) $ (492,141) $ 63,624,714
Amortization of unearned
compensation...................... 228,627 228,627
Vested stock grants to executive
officers.......................... --
Loss on Securities................... --
Available for Sale................... 850,156 850,156
Net loss............................. (5,249,208) (5,249,208)
---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1997........... -- $(7,762,270) $ (263,514) $ 59,454,289
========== =========== =========== ============
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE> 43
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss............................................ (5,249,208) (31,589,347) (10,292,179)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation..................................... 17,655,235 16,263,270 13,387,345
Amortization..................................... 2,591,428 2,082,932 2,381,201
Loss (gain) on disposal of property and
equipment...................................... (2,632,633) 339,056 466,712
Amortization of original issue discount and
deferred debt issuance costs................... 1,966,074 1,496,259 954,351
Amortization of unearned stock compensation, net
of recoveries.................................. 228,627 188,580 (436,105)
Consultants' compensation recognized on issuance
of stock....................................... -- -- 63,752
Gain on contract settlement...................... -- -- (855,000)
Write-off of preopening costs, development
project costs, land options and deposits &
property held for development.................. -- 7,054,532 12,104,212
Net loss on investment in unconsolidated
subsidiaries................................... 505,424 22,436,241 112,250
Minority interest................................ 1,404,180 -- --
Decrease in income tax receivable................ -- 4,225,047 1,899,459
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses.......... (507,361) 88,861 1,634,019
Decrease in notes and accounts receivable, net... 2,327,826 (147,705) (4,753,232)
Decrease in deferred income taxes -- current..... 3,157,856 2,923,171 (720,628)
Increase in other current assets................. (139,210) (277,793) (129,225)
Decrease in net deferred income tax
liability -- non current....................... (266,759) (4,173,197) (1,063,610)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable.......... (2,251,299) 2,924,820 (389,241)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses.......... 3,595,066 (4,278,518) (2,026,436)
Increase in accrued interest..................... 888,886 3,487,883 208,449
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll and
related benefits............................... (622,279) 1,255,364 2,236,447
Increase (decrease) in accrued progressive gaming
liabilities.................................... 323,634 55,376 (393,866)
Decrease in income taxes payable................. 805,716 (228,591) 959,609
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities...... 23,781,203 24,126,241 15,348,284
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment........ 19,895,616 1,436,821 173,389
Acquisitions of property and equipment.............. (37,176,995) (67,850,010) (11,396,332)
Acquisitions of gaming license...................... -- (15,250,000) --
Acquisitions of property held for sale.............. (126,400) 40,437 --
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries.......... (260,628) (651,206) (6,117,636)
Expenditures for organizational and acquisition
cost............................................. -- (359) (80,788)
Expenditures for land options and deposits.......... -- (480,000) (1,326,130)
Expenditures for development and preopening costs... -- (6,554,535) (130,794)
(Increase) decrease in deposits and other long-term
assets........................................... (2,920,936) 2,530,873 (1,898,786)
(Increase) decrease in marketable securities........ (10,629,405) -- 10,244,233
----------- ----------- -----------
</TABLE>
F-7
<PAGE> 44
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities.................................. (31,218,748) (86,777,979) (10,532,844)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of debt or notes payable..... 6,350,000 121,043,749 202,011
Payments of debt issuance costs..................... (349,955) (5,419,575) (2,000)
Principal payments on notes payable................. (4,606,480) (1,010,180) (1,185,342)
Principal payments on long-term debt................ (7,515,676) (48,644,469) (2,261,096)
Net proceeds from sale of common stock.............. -- 14,947 8,320,805
Net proceeds from exercise of employee stock
options.......................................... -- 457,734 379,812
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities.................................. (6,122,111) 66,442,206 5,454,190
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents......................................... (13,559,656) 3,790,468 10,269,630
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period........ 34,546,166 30,755,698 20,486,068
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash,
end of period....................................... 20,986,510 34,546,166 30,755,698
=========== =========== ===========
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized.............. 29,551,551 12,379,128 15,406,868
Income taxes paid, net of refunds..................... (6,382,324) (7,604,043) (4,236,206)
Supplemental schedule of non-cash operating,
investing, and financing activities:
Other current assets.................................. 22,315 -- --
Other current liabilities............................. 302,758 -- --
Property and equipment and other asset acquisitions
financed with short-term notes payable.............. -- -- 850,208
Property and equipment and other asset acquisitions
included in accounts and construction payable and
accrued expenses.................................... 1,805,945 5,455,469 177,091
Gaming license acquisition financed with long-term
debt................................................ -- 21,617,612 --
Land acquired through the issuance of common stock.... -- -- 22,140,969
Property and equipment under capital leases........... 375,891 81,114 63,632
Property and equipment and property held for sale
financed with long-term debt........................ -- 30,728,879 --
Consulting services performed for common stock........ -- -- 63,752
Common stock granted to officers...................... -- 567,188 101,563
Commitment for land options........................... -- -- (156,725)
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
<PAGE> 45
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
Casino Magic Corp. and Subsidiaries is an international gaming company with
operations in Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi ("Casino Magic-BSL"), Biloxi,
Mississippi ("Casino Magic-Biloxi"), Bossier City, Louisiana ("Casino
Magic-Bossier City"), and the Argentina Province of Neuquen in the cities of
Neuqu n City and San Mart n de los Andes ("Casino Magic-Neuquen").
Unless the context requires otherwise, reference in this Annual Report to
the "Company" means Casino Magic Corp. and its relevant subsidiaries, and
reference to "Casino Magic" means Casino Magic Corp.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Casino Magic
Corp. and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
CASINO REVENUES AND COMPLIMENTARIES:
In accordance with common industry practice, casino revenues are the net of
gaming wins less losses. Revenues exclude the retail value of complimentary
rooms, food and beverage furnished gratuitously to customers. The estimated
departmental costs of providing rooms is not significant, and the estimated
departmental costs of providing food and beverage services are included in
casino expense as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
- -------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
$21,846,000 $13,838,000 $12,072,000
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
For purposes of the consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash
flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES:
The Company holds U.S. agency securities as held to maturity and as such,
the investments are recorded at amortized costs, which, based on the short term
nature of the investments approximates fair value.
RESTRICTED FUNDS:
The Louisiana First Mortgage Notes (See Note 8), restrict the use of
certain cash amounts. At December 31, 1997, funds relating to the net proceeds
from the sale of the Crescent City Queen Riverboat ($11.7 million) are
restricted to be used for capital improvements at Casino Magic-Bossier City. The
balances that remain in these restricted accounts at December 31, 1997 are shown
as restricted marketable securities. At December 31, 1996, funds shown as
restricted cash relate to proceeds from the issuance of the Louisiana First
Mortgage Notes and were restricted for use in the original construction of the
land based pavilion and facilities at Casino Magic-Bossier City.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation, including
amortization of capital leases and leasehold improvements, is computed using the
straight-line method. Estimated useful lives for property and
F-9
<PAGE> 46
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
equipment are 15-31 years for barges and buildings, life of the lease for
leasehold improvements and 5-7 years for furniture and equipment.
Normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred.
Expenditures which materially extend the useful life of capital assets are
capitalized.
In June 1997, the Company changed the depreciable lives on the asset
categories, land improvements, buildings and improvements, and barges and
improvements from originally estimated useful lives of 10 or 15 years to 31
years. The useful lives for these assets originally reflected their tax lives
and have been changed to anticipated useful lives. These changes reduced the
December 31, 1997, net loss by $859,796 and the loss share by $0.02. Excluding
the change in depreciable lives net loss and earnings per share would have been
$(6,109,004) and $(0.17), respectively.
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES:
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries where the Company exercises
significant influence are accounted for under the equity method.
OPTIONS AND LAND DEPOSITS:
The costs of land options are amortized over the life of the option until
such time as the option is exercised or considered impaired by Management. As of
December 31, 1997, all land options were fully reserved.
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLES:
Deferred charges relating to debt issuance costs and original issue
discounts on long-term debt instruments are amortized over the life of the
related debt using the effective interest rate method to provide a constant
yield.
Included under other long term assets is "Deferred gaming license cost."
Deferred gaming license cost represents the estimated fair value of the
Louisiana gaming license, an asset acquired in conjunction with the purchase of
Crescent City Development Corporation ("Crescent City" see Note 5). This cost is
being amortized on a straight-line basis over twenty-five years, the estimated
period to be benefited by the license which commenced at the time gaming
operations began in Bossier City.
The costs capitalized to acquire the foreign casino concession agreement
are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the twelve-year life of the
agreement.
DEVELOPMENT AND PREOPENING COSTS:
All internal salary and related costs of the Company's development
activities are expensed as incurred. Amounts paid for outside consultants and
professional fees are expensed until gaming has been legalized in the
jurisdiction, the Company has an approved site and there is a reasonable
likelihood that the Company will be granted a gaming license. Preopening costs
are capitalized then expensed when the related business commences operations.
INCOME TAXES:
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
F-10
<PAGE> 47
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
No. 128 ("FAS 128"), "Earnings Per Share", which simplifies the computation of
earnings per share ("EPS"). FAS 128 is effective for financial statements issued
for periods ending after December 15, 1997, and requires restatement for all
prior period earnings per share data presented. Under FAS 128, the Company
computes two earnings per share amounts -- basic EPS and EPS assuming dilution.
Basic Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the
1997, 1996 and 1995 periods were 35,662,616, 35,448,068 and 33,260,904
respectively. EPS assuming dilution is based on the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding for the periods, including common equivalent
shares which reflect the dilutive effect of stock options granted to certain
employees and outside directors on various dates through December 31, 1997.
Dilutive options that are issued during a period or that expire or are cancelled
during a period are reflected in EPS assuming dilution computations for the time
they were outstanding during the periods being reported. There were no common
equivalent shares for 1997, 1996 and 1995. For the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company had 2,943,535, 2,320,292, and 2,2107,642
options which were considered antidilutive as a result of the exercise price of
the options exceeding the average price for the period, or that the Company had
a net loss for the period and therefore are not included in the calculation of
common
CERTAIN SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES:
GAMING REGULATION LICENSING. The Company has gaming operations in the
United States and abroad that depend on the continued licensability or
qualification of the Company and subsidiaries that hold gaming licenses in
various jurisdictions. Such licensing and qualifications are reviewed
periodically by the gaming authorities in those jurisdictions.
COMPETITION. The gaming industry is extremely competitive and the Company
faces competition from new developments in both the United States, specifically
on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and in Louisiana, and abroad.
FOREIGN OPERATIONS. The Company has investments and net assets of
approximately $9 million in gaming operations outside of the United States which
are subject to risks associated with the distance of these casino facilities
from the Company's executive offices, the stability of the relevant government,
regulations imposed by foreign governments, the continued ability to repatriate
cash, and currency exchange issues.
SEVERE WEATHER. The Mississippi Gulf Coast is subject to severe weather,
including hurricanes. Severe weather could cause damage to one or both of the
Company's Mississippi casino facilities. The Company maintains insurance against
casualty losses resulting from severe weather and against business interruption.
Such insurance may not adequately compensate the Company for loss of profits
resulting from severe weather.
CONSTRUCTION. Risk include cost overruns, delay in receipt of governmental
approvals, shortages in materials or skilled labor, labor disputes, unforeseen
environmental or engineering problems, work stoppage, fire and other natural
disasters, construction scheduling problems and weather interferences, any of
which, if it occurred, could delay construction or result in a substantial
increase in costs to the Company.
PERVASIVENESS OF ESTIMATES. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the
F-11
<PAGE> 48
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
RECLASSIFICATIONS:
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1996 and 1995 amounts to
conform with the December 31, 1997 presentation.
2. PROPOSED MERGER:
On February 19, 1998, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Hollywood Park, Inc. ("Hollywood"), and
Acquisition II, Inc. ("HP") a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hollywood. Under the
Merger Agreement, the Company has agreed to merge (the "Merger") with HP. Upon
such Merger, the Company shall be the surviving entity and will become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Hollywood. Upon the Merger, the shareholders of the
Company will be entitled to receive $2.27 for each share of the Company's stock
held.
The Merger is subject to the approval of the Company's shareholders prior
to October 31, 1998, and to the approval of the Mississippi Gaming Commission,
the Nevada Gaming Commission, and the Louisiana Gaming Control Board. If the
Merger Agreement is terminated for certain reasons, the Company will be required
to pay Hollywood $3,500,000.
The Merger Agreement restricts the ability of the Company to engage in
certain transactions prior to the time of the Merger, except those which are in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, unless the
Company obtains the consent of Hollywood, which consent may not be unreasonably
withheld. The Merger Agreement also imposes limits on the capital expenditures
and borrowing which the Company may effect, which are not inconsistent with the
Company's current plans.
3. NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:
Notes and accounts receivable consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Current:
- ---------------------------------------------------
Notes receivable................................... $ 885,995 $ 790,228
Accounts receivable -- air charter................. 156,818 548,239
Accounts receivable -- trade....................... 3,601,778 2,505,463
Other.............................................. 581,376 606,631
---------- ----------
5,225,967 4,450,561
Less allowance for doubtful accounts............... 1,444,022 1,561,075
---------- ----------
Total Notes and Accounts Receivable (current)...... 3,781,945 2,889,486
Noncurrent:
- ---------------------------------------------------
Notes receivable................................... 3,385,198 4,119,700
---------- ----------
Total Notes and Accounts Receivable................ $7,167,143 $7,009,186
========== ==========
</TABLE>
Included in notes receivable is a commercial loan in which the Company,
through a wholly-owned subsidiary, participated in the initial amount of $5
million. The entire loan amount is $17,500,000. A
F-12
<PAGE> 49
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE: (CONTINUED)
consortium of lenders made the loan to the Sisseton-Wahpeton Dakota Nation, a
Native American Tribe, for the construction of a casino facility on Tribal land.
The term loan is repayable over a sixty-month period beginning February 1997, in
monthly installments of $105,230 including principal and interest at a fixed
rate of 10% through February 2002.
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Property and equipment consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1997 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land and improvements........................... $ 85,020,923 $ 67,658,624
Buildings and improvements...................... 69,193,225 44,554,665
Barges and improvements......................... 57,568,009 55,203,063
Leasehold improvements.......................... 300,801 382,907
Furniture and equipment......................... 75,876,943 69,663,192
Construction in progress........................ 33,843,154 48,549,525
------------ ------------
321,803,055 286,011,976
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization.................................. (57,809,603) (42,319,405)
------------ ------------
$263,993,452 $243,692,571
============ ============
</TABLE>
5. STOCK ACQUISITIONS:
In May 1996, Casino Magic, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jefferson
Casino Corporation ("Jefferson Corp") acquired Crescent City Capital Development
Corp. ("Crescent City") for $50 million plus the assumption of $5.7 million in
equipment liabilities. Jefferson Corp paid $15 million in cash at closing and
caused Crescent City to issue $35 million of 11.5% secured, three year notes.
Crescent City, which was the subject of a plan of reorganization under Chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, owned the Crescent City Queen riverboat
("Crescent City Riverboat"), gaming and related equipment and surveillance
equipment and a license to conduct riverboat gaming operations in Louisiana.
Crescent City emerged from the Bankruptcy proceedings as Casino Magic of
Louisiana Corp. ("Casino Magic-Bossier City"). The Company is using Casino
Magic-Bossier City's gaming license in Bossier City, Louisiana, where it
currently owns 23 acres of land. Although Jefferson Corp. was required to
purchase the Crescent City Riverboat to obtain the Louisiana gaming license, the
Crescent City Riverboat could not be used at Casino Magic-Bossier City because
of its width. Therefore, the Company purchased a casino riverboat (the "Bossier
Riverboat") for use at Casino Magic-Bossier City for $20 million. The Crescent
City Riverboat, was sold and the proceeds will be used to assist in the funding
of the pavilion expansion and construction of a hotel at Casino Magic-Bossier
City.
No assurances can be given that the proceeds from the sale of the Crescent
City Riverboat and the cash flow from the operations of Casino Magic-Bossier
City will be sufficient to complete such hotel and related facilities.
6. DISPOSITIONS:
In September 1997, the Company sold the Crescent City Riverboat for $11.7
million. Other income for the period ended December 31, 1997, includes the gain
on the sale of $1.4 million. The proceeds from the sale are restricted by the
Indenture governing the $115 First Mortgage Notes issued by Casino Magic-Bossier
City.
F-13
<PAGE> 50
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. DISPOSITIONS: (CONTINUED)
The Indenture restriction requires the proceeds from the sale of the Crescent
City Riverboat to be used for capital improvements at the Casino Magic-Bossier
City facility or returned to the Indenture trustee.
On June 1, 1997, the Company sold a 49% interest in its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Casino Magic Neuquen S.A., for $7.0 million. The Company retained a
controlling interest in Casino Magic-Neuquen and manages its two facilities
located in Neuquen City and San Martin de Los Andes, Argentina for a fee equal
to two percent of Casino Magic-Neuquen's gross monthly revenues. The gain of
$1.3 million is recorded in other income.
At September 30, 1996, management determined that its 49% equity investment
in Porto Carras Casino S.A., and notes and accounts receivable relating to
unpaid management fees and royalties were impaired. Because of this impairment,
management wrote off its investment in such gaming facilities in Porto Carras,
Greece, ("Porto Carras") and all unpaid notes and receivables related thereto.
The total charge recorded relating to the write off of Porto Carras was $26.1
million. Management's decision was based, primarily, on the results from Porto
Carras after the opening of a competing casino. Although the Company anticipated
some revenue loss as a result of this increased competition, the actual effects
were much greater than anticipated and resulted in a $2.0 million loss from
operations at Porto Carras for the month of September 1996. Despite new
marketing and cost containment efforts, these losses continued; furthermore, the
majority owner in Porto Carras venture was unwilling or unable to advance any
funds to the operation. Additionally, the majority owner informed the Company
that it did not intend to operate a substantial portion of the Porto Carras
resort area, consisting of two hotels and amenities, during the 1997 season.
These factors, among others, led to the Company's decision to write off its
investment in Porto Carras and led to the sale of Porto Carras, for a nominal
amount in December 1996.
7. NOTES AND CONTRACTS PAYABLE:
Short-term notes and contracts payable consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------
1997 1996
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Construction contracts(a)................................... $ 382 $4,540,434
Other(b).................................................... 305,543 168,169
-------- ----------
$305,925 $4,708,603
======== ==========
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(a) Consists of various payables relating to both fixed and cost plus contracts.
(b) In 1997, the balance consisted of five notes payable. The detail of these
notes is as follows: (i) $199,763 equipment, payable in monthly installments
of $15,814. (ii) $164,989 note collateralized by equipment, payable in
monthly installments of $14,892. (iii) three notes totaling $12,000
collateralized by equipment, payable in total monthly installments of $500.
F-14
<PAGE> 51
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. LONG -TERM DEBT:
Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations, consists of the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
1997 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Notes payable, bank(a)...................................... $ 8,170,063 $ 9,585,130
Equipment contracts(b)...................................... 2,099,465 622,274
Notes payable, land(c)...................................... 2,052,569 3,470,415
Other(d).................................................... 920,422 308,514
Capital lease obligations (Note 9).......................... 726,018 1,207,986
Louisiana First Mortgage Notes(e)........................... 115,000,000 115,000,000
First Mortgage Notes(f)..................................... 135,000,000 135,000,000
Unamortized original issue discount......................... (1,906,373) (2,284,450)
------------ ------------
262,062,164 262,909,869
Less current maturities..................................... (8,590,945) (4,648,638)
------------ ------------
$253,471,219 $258,261,231
============ ============
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(a) Consists of four notes payable to banks. The detail of these notes is as
follows: (i) Original balance of $3,000,000 uncollateralized promissory
note, payable in monthly installments of interest only through July 1996;
thereafter, principal and interest based on a 60 month amortization through
February 2000. The promissory note bears interest at prime plus 1% (9.5% at
December 31, 1997) throughout the life of the note with a final balloon
payment of $305,243 due in February 2000. (ii) Original balance of
$1,700,000 note collateralized by gaming equipment. Payments of principal
and interest based on a 36 month amortization through May 1998. The note
bears interest at prime plus .25%. (8.75% at December 31, 1997) with a final
balloon payment of $1,065,807 due in May 1998. (iii) Original balance of
$3,850,000 note collateralized by the equipment. The note is payable in 10
quarterly payments of $385,000, including interest at 8.25%. (iv) Original
balance of $2,500,000 uncollateralized line of credit due in March 1998
bearing interest at prime plus 1/4% (8.75% at December 31, 1997). In March
1998 this note was refinanced to a term loan payable in eighteen monthly
installments of $142,760 bearing interest at 8.75%.
During 1997 the Company was not in compliance with certain debt covenants
relating to notes (iii) and (iv). The Company has received a waiver of the
covenants at December 31, 1997, and has restructured these covenants to
allow the Company to maintain compliance.
(b) Consists of two notes payable collateralized by equipment. The detail of
these notes is as follows: (i) Original balance of $946,005 note payable in
eleven monthly payments of $78,833, including interest at prime plus 3%.
(11.5% at December 31, 1997) with final balloon payment due at term of note.
(ii) Original balance of $1,075,740 note collateralized by equipment,
payable in twenty-three monthly payments of $44,823, including interest at
prime plus 1%. (9.50% at December 31, 1997) with final balloon payment due
at term of note. In March 1998 these notes were refinanced to a term loan
payable in twenty-three monthly installments of $93,465 bearing interest at
10.5% with a final balloon payment of $101,319 due in March 2000.
(c) Consists of three notes payable for land acquisitions. The detail of the
three notes is as follows: (i) Original balance of $700,000 note payable in
monthly installments of $14,959 including interest at prime plus 2% (10.50%
at December 31, 1997), through April 1999. (ii) Original balance of $870,942
note payable in monthly installments of $12,134 including interest at 8%
through July 2003. (iii) Original balance of $3,000,000 note payable in
monthly installments of $111,699 including interest at 8.75% through
November 1998.
F-15
<PAGE> 52
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. LONG -TERM DEBT: (CONTINUED)
(d) Consists of various collateralized notes payable through the year 2004. The
interest rates on these notes vary from 9.5% to 13.25% at fixed rates.
(e) On August 22, 1996, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Casino
Magic-Bossier City, sold $115,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 13%,
First Mortgage Notes securities due in 2003 ("Louisiana First Mortgage
Notes"). Contingent Interest is payable on the Louisiana First Mortgage
Notes, on each interest payment date, in an aggregate amount equal to 5% of
Casino Magic-Bossier City's Adjusted Consolidated Cash Flow (as defined in
the Louisiana First Mortgage Notes Indenture ("Louisiana Indenture") for the
Accrual Period (as defined in the Louisiana Indenture, but generally a six
month period) last completed prior to such interest payment date; provided
that no Contingent Interest is payable with respect to any period prior to
the Commencement Date (as defined in the Louisiana Indenture). Payment of
all or a portion of any installment of Contingent Interest may be deferred,
at the option of Casino Magic-Bossier City, if, and only to the extent that,
(i) the payment of such portion of Contingent Interest will cause Casino
Magic-Bossier City's Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the
Louisiana Indenture) for Casino Magic-Bossier City's most recently completed
Reference Period prior to such interest payment date to be less than 1.5 to
1.0 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the assumed payment of such
Contingent Interest and (ii) the principal amount of the Louisiana First
Mortgage Notes corresponding to such Contingent Interest has not then
matured and become due and payable (at stated maturity, upon acceleration,
upon redemption, upon maturity of a repurchase obligation or otherwise). The
aggregate amount of Contingent Interest payable in any Semiannual Period
will be reduced pro rata for reductions in the outstanding principal amount
of notes prior to the close of business on the record date immediately
preceding such payment of Contingent Interest. During 1997, the Company
accrued $677,251 of contingent interest, none of which was paid.
The Louisiana First Mortgage Notes are secured by a first priority security
interest, subject to permitted liens, in substantially all of the existing and
future assets of Bossier City, including the Bossier Riverboat and substantially
all of the other assets that comprise Casino Magic-Bossier City. The Jefferson
Guarantee will be secured by a pledge of all of the capital stock of Jefferson
Casino Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
Casino Magic-Bossier City has contractually committed to apply net proceeds
from the asset sale of the Crescent City Riverboat to the construction of an
entertainment facility or hotel.
The Louisiana First Mortgage Notes are governed by the Louisiana Indenture.
The Louisiana Indenture pursuant to which the Louisiana First Mortgage Notes
have been issued contains certain covenants that will limit the ability of
Casino Magic-Bossier City and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur
additional indebtedness and issue preferred stock, pay dividends, make
investments or make other restricted payments, incur liens, enter into mergers
or consolidations, enter into transactions with affiliates or sell assets.
The proposed merger is a Change of Control, each holder of Louisiana First
Mortgage Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or
any part (equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof) at an offer price in
cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase. Within 30 days
following any Change of Control, the Company will mail a notice to each Holder
describing the transaction or transactions that constitute the Change of Control
and offering to repurchase the First Mortgage Notes pursuant to the procedures
required by the Indenture and described in such notice. The Company will comply
with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and any other
securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent such laws and
F-16
<PAGE> 53
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. LONG -TERM DEBT: (CONTINUED)
regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the First
Mortgage Notes. The Louisiana First Mortgage Notes are redeemable at the option
of the Company. The redemption amounts are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
August 15,
2000........................................................ 106.500%
2001........................................................ 104.332%
2002........................................................ 102.166%
</TABLE>
(f) On October 14, 1993, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Company,
Casino Magic Finance Corp. ("Finance Corp."), sold $135,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount of 11 1/2% First Mortgage Notes due in 2001 (the "Finance
Notes") and warrants to purchase 810,000 shares of Casino Magic Corp. common
stock. Proceeds from the Notes were allocated by the underwriter between the
Finance Corp. and the Company based on the estimated fair market value at the
time of issuance of the Finance Notes and the warrants in the amounts of
$131,760,000 and $3,240,000 ($4 per warrant), respectively. The value of the
warrants is treated as original issue discount for financial statement purposes,
and is reflected in the balance sheet net of amortization as an adjustment to
the carrying value of long-term debt. The Finance Notes are governed by an
Indenture (the "Indenture") entered into on the same date between Finance Corp.,
the Company and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company as the Trustee. Under Section
4.10 of the Indenture, the Company's ability to pay dividends on its common
stock is restricted to an amount which is determined under a formula based
primarily on the Company's future income, and is precluded upon the occurrence
of an "Event of Default" as defined under the Indenture. Events of Default
include, among other things, the failure to pay the interest or principal due on
the Finance Notes, the entry of a judgment in excess of $10,000,000 against the
Company or Casino Magic-BSL, Casino Magic-Biloxi and Finance Corp., which is not
discharged within 60 days after entry, and the default by the Casino Magic or
Casino Magic-BSL, Casino Magic-Biloxi and Finance Corp. under indebtedness due
to third parties. The Indenture also contains certain covenants that restrict,
among other things, the making of certain investments, payments of dividends and
other distributions, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and future
guarantees of indebtedness, certain transactions with shareholders and
affiliates, certain mergers and consolidations, certain asset sales and the
creation of certain liens. The Finance Notes are secured by a pledge of the
stock of Finance Corp., Bay Saint Louis and Biloxi along with the accounts
receivable, inventories, property and equipment, property held for development
and deposits of Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi.
The Finance Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company. The
redemption amounts are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
October 15,
1997........................................................ 105.750%
1998........................................................ 103.833%
1999........................................................ 101.917%
2000 and thereafter......................................... 100.000%
</TABLE>
F-17
<PAGE> 54
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. LONG -TERM DEBT: (CONTINUED)
Maturities of the Company's long-term debt, including capital lease obligations,
as of December 31, 1997, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
<S> <C>
1998............................... $ 8,590,945
1999............................... 3,503,955
2000............................... 1,017,061
2001............................... 250,963
2002............................... 135,273,782
Thereafter......................... 115,331,829
------------
263,968,535
Unamortized Original Issue
Discount......................... (1,906,371)
------------
$262,062,164
============
</TABLE>
9. LEASE COMMITMENTS:
The Company has long-term lease agreements for land for the site of Casino
Magic-Biloxi and additional land at Casino Magic-BSL. The Casino Magic-Biloxi
land is classified as an operating lease. The annual rental payments for the
initial five-year term of the Casino Magic-Biloxi land lease began June 5, 1993,
and are $550,000, $250,000, $450,000, $450,000 and $200,000 for the first
through fifth year. The land lease contains seventeen, five-year renewal options
at contractually higher rentals, plus inflation adjustments not to exceed 4.5%
per year.
On June 4, 1993, the Company entered into a long-term agreement with the
State of Mississippi to lease 283,217 square feet of submerged lands or
tidelands for Casino Magic-Biloxi. The initial lease term expires May 31, 2003,
with one five year extension. Annual rental payments are due in advance on the
first of June in the amount of $595,000, plus an annual increase of $45,000 for
the first five years. In May 1998 the lease amount will be determined under
Mississippi law regarding the leasing of public trust tidelands.
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for capital
and operating leases (with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year) as
of December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
CAPITAL OPERATING
LEASES LEASES
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
1998.................................................. $192,065 $1,479,257
1999.................................................. 207,325 1,164,357
2000.................................................. 153,856 1,026,287
2001.................................................. 20,348 782,454
2002.................................................. 22,007 775,000
Thereafter............................................ 130,417 4,650,000
-------- ----------
Total minimum lease payments.......................... 726,018 $9,877,355
==========
Less amount representing interest (9% to 13%)......... 145,059
--------
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments... $580,959
========
</TABLE>
Rent expense for all non-cancelable operating leases were $3,644,000
$1,800,000, and $3,048,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
F-18
<PAGE> 55
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
ONGOING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:
A class action lawsuit was filed on April 26, 1994, in the United States
District Court, Middle District of Florida (the "Poulos Lawsuit"), naming as
defendants 41 manufacturers, distributors and casino operators of video poker
and electronic slot machines, including the Company. The lawsuit alleges that
such defendants have engaged in a course of fraudulent and misleading conduct
intended to induce people to play such games based on a false belief concerning
the operation of the gaming machines, as well as the extent to which there is an
opportunity to win. The suit alleges violations of the Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organization Act, as well as claims of common law fraud, unjust
enrichment and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks damages in excess of $6
billion. On May 10, 1994, a second class action lawsuit was filed in the United
States District Court, Middle District of Florida (the "Ahern Lawsuit"), naming
as defendants the same defendants who were named in the Poulos Lawsuit and
adding as defendants the owners of certain casino operations in Puerto Rico and
the Bahamas, who were not named as defendants in the Poulos Lawsuit. The claims
in the Ahern Lawsuit are identical to the claims in the Poulos Lawsuit. Because
of the similarity of parties and claims, the Poulos Lawsuit and Ahern Lawsuit
were consolidated into one case file in the United States District Court, Middle
District of Florida. On December 9, 1994 a motion by the defendants for change
of venue was granted, transferring the case to the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada, in Las Vegas. In response to a motion to dismiss the
Complaint brought by the Company and other defendants, the United States
District Court for the District of Nevada entered an order dated April 17, 1996,
granting the motions and dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
The plaintiffs then filed an amended Complaint on May 31, 1996, in which
the plaintiffs sought damages against the Company and other defendants in excess
of $1 billion and punitive damages for violations of the Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations Act and for state common law claims for fraud, unjust
enrichment and negligent misrepresentation. The Company and other defendants
have moved to dismiss the amended Complaint. The Company believes that the
claims are without merit and does not expect that the lawsuit will have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of
the Company.
On or about September 6, 1996, Casino America, Inc. commenced litigation in
the Chancery Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, Second Judicial District,
against the Company, and James Edward Ernst, its Chief Executive Officer
(collectively "Defendants"), seeking injunctive relief and unspecified
compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial as well as punitive
damages. Plaintiff claims, among other things, that Defendants (i) breached the
terms of an agreement they had with Plaintiff, (ii) tortiously interfered with
certain business relations of plaintiff; and (iii) breached covenants of good
faith and fair dealing they allegedly owed to plaintiff. On or about October 8,
1996, Defendants interposed an answer to plaintiff's complaint denying the
allegations contained in the complaint. The discovery phase of this litigation
is continuing and a trial date has been set for August 1998. While the Company's
management cannot predict the outcome of this action, management believes
plaintiff's claims are without merit and the Company intends to vigorously
defend this action.
In addition, the Company is a litigant in legal matters arising in the
normal course of business. In the opinion of management, all such pending legal
matters are either adequately covered by insurance, or if not insured, will not
have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of
operations of the Company.
CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS:
ARGENTINA. In December 1994, the Company, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Casino Magic-Neuquen, entered into a 12-year concession agreement
with the Province of Neuquen, Argentina. Casino Magic-Neuquen which began
operations in January 1995 operates two casinos in the Province of Neuquen in
F-19
<PAGE> 56
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: (CONTINUED)
the cities of Neuquen City and San Martin de los Andes. The Company has
unrestricted rights to increase the number of gaming positions at both
locations.
CAMPTOWN GREYHOUND RACING, INC. On July 7, 1994, the Company and Alliance
Gaming Corp. (formerly United Gaming) formed two joint ventures ("KGP" and
"KFP") to lend Camptown Greyhound Racing, Inc. ("Camptown") approximately $3.2
million. On October 28, 1994, KFP executed a loan agreement with Boatmen's Bank
of Kansas City ("Boatmen's") whereby Boatmen's lent $3.2 million to Camptown.
KFP had collateralized the loan with a $3.1 million certificate of deposit
(one-half funded by each party to the joint venture) and, in addition,
guaranteed the repayment of the loan. In January 1996, Camptown filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of U.S. Bankruptcy Code. KFP has satisfied its
obligation under the guarantee, and now owns a second mortgage on Camptown's
facility in Frontense, Kansas in the amount of $3,205,000, plus accrued
interest. The Company has taken steps to protect its investment and rights to
operate gaming devices at the Camptown facility, if and when such operation is
legalized. The Company's $1,580,000 share of the amount lent by KFP to Camptown
was expensed in 1995.
In January 1997, the Company transferred all of its interest in KGP and KFP
to Alliance Gaming Corp., an unrelated third party, except for a deminimus
interest. The consideration for the transfer was Alliance Gaming Corp.'s
agreement to assume certain current financial obligations and to repay the
Company all of its cost in the project if they are successful in commencing
gaming operations at Camptown.
INDIANA. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Crawford County
Casino, Corp. ("Indiana Corp.") is one of two applicants for the tenth gaming
license expected to be issued in the State of Indiana. If successful in
obtaining this gaming license, the Company has entered into an option agreement
to sell to Harrah's Operating Company the common stock of Indiana Corp. for
approximately $5.0 million. The option expires on January 2001. The Company can
give no assurances that a gaming license will be obtained in Indiana. All land
options held by Indiana Corp. associated with a possible gaming site are fully
reserved at December 31, 1997.
LAND ACQUISITIONS:
In 1993, the Company exercised its option to purchase of approximately 3.5
acres of unimproved land in downtown St. Louis, Missouri at a cost of
approximately $4,000,000. At December 31, 1997, approximately $4,000,000 is
included in property held for sale related to this transaction.
In 1994, the Company exercised an option and to purchase additional real
estate located in Downtown St. Louis, Missouri at a cost of approximately
$800,000. At December 31, 1997, approximately $800,000 is included in property
held for sale related to this transaction.
In 1992, the Company purchased real estate located in downtown Bay Saint
Louis, Mississippi at a cost of approximately $1,200,000. At December 31, 1997,
the Company had written down the value of the property to $800,000 and this
value is included in property held for sale.
The Company had acquired land and options to purchase land in order to
enhance the Company's developmental and licensing procurement potential in
various States. Management has significantly reduced its development of new
gaming venues and because of this all land options are reserved for on the
Company's financial statements at December 31, 1997.
F-20
<PAGE> 57
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN:
In 1992, the Company adopted an incentive stock option plan (the "Plan") in
which directors, officers, and key employees of the Company participate. The
Company has registered 3,700,000 shares of the Company's common stock currently
authorized for issuance under the Plan pursuant to stock options.
In October 1995, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"
effective in 1996. Under SFAS 123, companies can either record expense based on
the fair value of stock based compensation upon issuance or elect to remain
under the current "APB Opinion No. 25" method whereby no compensation cost is
recognized upon grant if certain requirements are met. The Company is continuing
to account for its stock-based compensation plans under APB Opinion No. 25.
However, pro forma disclosures as if the Company adopted the cost recognition
requirements under SFAS 123 are presented below.
A summary of the status of the Company's stock options, non-qualified
options, and warrants as of December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 and changes during
the years ended on those dates is presented below (shares in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
WEIGHTED EXERCISE WEIGHTED EXERCISE WEIGHTED EXERCISE
SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at beginning of year........ 4,200 $0.67 5,108 $ 7.60 4,943 $7.42
Granted................................. 400 $1.69 1,998 $ 3.56 950 $5.06
Exercised............................... (239) $1.59 (424) $ 1.72 (344) $1.43
Canceled................................ (915) $2.23 2,482 $12.00 (441) $4.61
Outstanding at end of year.............. 3,446 $3.96 4,200 $ 3.67 5,108 $7.60
Options exercisable at end of year...... 1,985 $3.96 2,655 $ 3.11 3,072 $9.12
Options available for future grants..... 2,582 2,068 1,583
Weighted average fair value of options
granted during the year............... $1.69 $1.11 $1.28
</TABLE>
Had compensation cost for the Company's 1997, 1996 and 1995 grants for
stock-based compensation plans been determined consistent with SFAS 123, the
Company's net income and net earnings (loss) per common share for the years
ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 would approximate the pro forma amounts
below (in thousands, except per share data):
The fair value of each option granted during the periods presented is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of
20%, (3) risk-free interest rates of 5.2%, 5.26%, 5.47% and 5.5%, and (4)
expected life of 2.25, 4.5, 6.75, and 9 years.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
AS REPORTED PRO FORMA AS REPORTED PRO FORMA AS REPORTED PRO FORMA
----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Income (Loss)............ $(5,249) $(5,958) $(31,589) $(32,563) $(10,292) $(10,660)
Earnings per common share
Basic...................... $ (0.15) $ (0.17) $ (0.89) $ (0.92) $ (0.31) $ (0.32)
Diluted.................... $ (0.15) $ (0.17) $ (0.89) $ (0.92) $ (0.31) $ (0.32)
</TABLE>
F-21
<PAGE> 58
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS: (CONTINUED)
The effects of applying SFAS 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not
indicative of future amounts. SFAS 123 does not apply to awards prior to 1995,
and additional awards in future years are anticipated.
PENSIONS AND OTHER BENEFITS:
In July 1993, the Company adopted The Casino Magic Corp. 401(k) Plan (the
"401(k) Plan"), a defined contribution plan covering all eligible employees of
the Company who have one year of service and are age twenty-one or older. The
401(k) Plan is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Each year, participants may contribute up to 15%
of pretax annual compensation, as defined in the 401(k) Plan. The Company's
matching and/or additional contributions may be contributed at the discretion of
the Company's Board of Directors. The Company's contributions to the 401(k) Plan
are allocated to employed participants' accounts as of the last day of the plan
year. Total employer contributions to the 401(k) Plan at December 31, 1997, 1996
and 1995 were approximately $201,000, $176,000, and $177,000, respectively.
12. WRITE-OFF OF CAPITALIZED COSTS RELATING TO INACTIVE DEVELOPMENTS:
In 1995, the Company decided to terminate development efforts with respect
to specific properties and jurisdictions. Because of this determination,
significant capitalized amounts relating to land, land options, joint ventures
and construction projects were written-off or revalued. In addition, certain
consulting agreements that were entered into to pursue gaming opportunities in
new jurisdictions were terminated. The amount expensed in the fourth quarter of
1995 was $14,542,164.
13. ADVERTISING:
The company expenses all production and communication costs of advertising
as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $7,815,000, $5,470,000, and
$4,472,000 for years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
During the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, the Company
incurred $7,247, $1,346,861 and $353,888, respectively, for architectural and
design services provided by an architectural firm that is wholly-owned by an
outside director and shareholder of the Company. The director resigned in
October 1996.
During the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, the Company
incurred $145,744, $154,028 and $388,944, respectively, for legal services
provided by a law firm in which an outside director of the Company is a
shareholder.
During the year ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company incurred
$219,800, and $387,422, respectively, for charter plane rentals provided by a
company that is wholly owned by the Company's Chairman.
The Company purchased a jet airplane in February 1996 from the Company's
Chairman. The Company paid $1.7 million for the airplane which approximated fair
value at the date of purchase. The plane was sold in February 1997 to an
unrelated third party for $1.4 million, which approximated fair value.
F-22
<PAGE> 59
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
15. INCOME TAXES:
Pretax financial income (loss) generated from domestic and foreign sources
was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Domestic........................................... $(12,132,945) $(15,322,992) $(15,336,975)
Foreign............................................ 4,948,737 (20,942,537) 1,813,932
------------ ------------ ------------
Total pretax loss.................................. $ (7,184,208) $(36,265,529) $(13,523,043)
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31 are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal and state current............................. $(2,733,203) $(4,253,704) $(2,546,443)
Foreign current....................................... 1,064,963 827,548 1,099,816
Federal deferred...................................... (266,760) (1,250,026) (1,221,514)
Foreign deferred...................................... -- -- (562,723)
----------- ----------- -----------
Total................................................. $(1,935,000) $(4,676,182) $(3,230,864)
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Components of deferred tax liabilities (assets) are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
1997 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Depreciation and amortization............................... $ 12,154,826 $ 9,535,121
Foreign source income....................................... 257,949 257,949
------------ ------------
Gross deferred tax liabilities.............................. 12,412,775 9,793,070
------------ ------------
Write-off of preopening costs............................... (1,781,870) (2,493,074)
Tax benefits related to non-statutory stock options......... (504,000) (504,000)
Accrued employee benefits and liabilities................... (1,428,370) (1,433,067)
Abandoned development projects.............................. (1,515,657) (10,229,821)
Net operating loss carry-forward............................ (21,299,675) (2,269,344)
Other....................................................... (902,737) (798,293)
------------ ------------
Gross deferred tax assets................................... (27,432,309) (17,727,599)
------------ ------------
Less valuation allowance.................................... 15,019,534 8,201,290
============ ============
Net deferred tax liabilities................................ $ -- $ 266,761
============ ============
</TABLE>
F-23
<PAGE> 60
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
15. INCOME TAXES: (CONTINUED)
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income tax
determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to
pre-tax income from continuing operations as a result of the following
differences:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Statutory U.S. tax rate (35%)........................ $(2,023,010) $(12,692,935) $(4,733,065)
Increase (decrease) in rates resulting from:
Expenses which were non-deductible for tax
purposes........................................... 1,299,010 357,805 733,876
Expenses which were deductible for tax purposes and
not book........................................... (6,988,244) -- --
Foreign taxes........................................ 1,064,963 827,548 1,099,816
Valuation allowance.................................. 6,818,244 8,201,290 --
State tax benefit.................................... -- (802,174) --
Other................................................ (2,105,996) (567,716) (331,491)
----------- ------------ -----------
Effective tax rate (33%), (13%) and (24%),
respectively....................................... $(1,935,000) $ (4,676,182) $(3,230,864)
=========== ============ ===========
</TABLE>
The valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets was recorded in
recognition of the significant operating losses incurred by the Company for the
last three years.
Mississippi State taxes were offset by a tax credit for state gaming taxes
based on gross revenues realized by Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi.
The credit is the lesser of the annual total gaming taxes paid or the state
income tax. Credit carry-forwards are not permitted.
Louisiana State taxes do not allow for an offset of state gaming taxes
based on gross revenues realized by Louisiana.
16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's financial instruments
at December 31, 1997 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents.................................. 20,902 20,902
Marketable securities...................................... 10,629 10,629
Notes receivable........................................... 3,385 3,385
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt and
long-term debt........................................... 262,368 247,568
</TABLE>
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in
estimating its fair value disclosure:
Cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities. The carrying amount
reported on the consolidated balance sheet approximates its fair value because
of the short term nature of these instruments.
Notes receivable. This is a long-term note receivable from an Indian Tribe.
The fair value of the note approximates market value based on the interest rate
of the note and the collateral securing the note.
F-24
<PAGE> 61
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:(CONTINUED)
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt and long-term debt.
The fair value of the Company's debt either approximates its carrying value or
is based upon the market price of the debt instruments.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on
relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.
These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters
of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision.
Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
17. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER TOTAL
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Revenue................................. $65,781 $65,958 $66,495 $63,240 $261,474
Income from operations.................. 1,997 5,927 10,125 6,506 24,555
Income (loss) before tax and minority
interest.............................. (5,607) (1,020) 3,390 (2,543) (5,780)
Net income (loss)....................... (3,672) (1,222) 2,675 (3,030) (5,249)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic................................. (0.10) (0.03) 0.08 (0.08) (0.15)
Diluted............................... (0.10) (0.03) 0.08 (0.08) (0.15)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER TOTAL
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Revenue................................. $43,125 $42,368 $43,271 $51,514 $180,278
Income from operations.................. 5,565 6,473 5,355 (8,550) 8,843
Income (loss) before tax................ 2,352 2,456 (26,024) (15,050) (36,266)
Net income (loss)....................... 1,644 1,660 (20,683) (14,210) (31,589)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic................................. 0.05 0.05 (0.57) (0.40) (0.89)
Diluted............................... 0.05 0.05 (0.57) (0.40) (0.89)
</TABLE>
NOTE: Earnings (loss) per share totals will note necessarily agree to the sum of
the quarterly information.
F-25
<PAGE> 1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-Q
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-20712
</TABLE>
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MINNESOTA 64-0817483
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
</TABLE>
711 CASINO MAGIC DRIVE, BAY SAINT LOUIS, MS 39520
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(228) 467-9257
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date. 35,722,124 shares common stock
outstanding as of July 30, 1998.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE NO.
--------
<S> <C> <C>
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements........................................ 1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations --
For the six months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997............. 1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations --
For the three months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997........... 2
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets --
June 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997......................... 3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows --
For the six months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997............. 4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements........ 5
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and
Results of Operations....................................... 7
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings........................................... 11
Item 2. Changes in Securities....................................... 11
Item 3. Default Upon Senior Securities.............................. 11
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 11
Item 5. Other Information........................................... 11
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K............................ 11
SIGNATURES.................................................. 12
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
----------------------------
1998 1997
---- ----
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Casino.................................................... $138,208,950 $123,731,151
Food and beverage......................................... 5,103,982 4,986,717
Rooms..................................................... 1,561,087 775,014
Other operating income.................................... 2,623,837 2,245,541
------------ ------------
Total revenues....................................... 147,497,856 131,738,423
------------ ------------
Costs and expenses:
Casino.................................................... 63,865,168 58,241,241
Food and beverage......................................... 5,733,569 6,597,024
Rooms..................................................... 680,290 368,665
Other operating costs and expenses........................ 2,186,555 2,308,621
Advertising and marketing................................. 17,965,920 21,405,322
General and administrative................................ 13,118,131 14,080,585
Property operation, maintenance and energy cost........... 5,480,911 6,044,447
Rents, property taxes and insurance....................... 4,450,647 3,959,568
Development expenses...................................... 219,848 455,132
Preopening expenses....................................... 681,754 --
Depreciation and amortization............................. 10,347,608 10,353,382
------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses............................. 124,730,401 123,813,987
------------ ------------
Income from operations...................................... 22,767,455 7,924,436
------------ ------------
Other (Income) Expenses:
Equity loss from unconsolidated subsidiary................ 244,307 229,061
Interest expense, net..................................... 14,980,269 15,749,566
Other..................................................... 1,111,410 (1,427,177)
------------ ------------
Total other expense.................................. 16,335,986 14,551,450
------------ ------------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest of
subsidiary................................................ 6,431,469 (6,627,014)
Income taxes expense (benefit)............................ 1,112,173 (1,935,000)
Minority interest......................................... 851,773 201,512
------------ ------------
Net income (loss)......................................... $ 4,467,523 $ (4,893,526)
============ ============
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic..................................................... $ 0.13 $ (0.14)
============ ============
Diluted................................................... $ 0.12 $ (0.14)
============ ============
Average shares and equivalents outstanding:
Basic..................................................... 35,722,124 35,637,083
============ ============
Diluted................................................... 35,857,716 35,637,083
============ ============
</TABLE>
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
<PAGE> 4
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
--------------------------
1998 1997
---- ----
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Casino.................................................... $70,036,910 $62,057,468
Food and beverage......................................... 2,691,139 2,479,674
Rooms..................................................... 1,192,048 227,583
Other operating income.................................... 1,391,858 1,192,820
----------- -----------
Total revenues......................................... 75,311,955 65,957,545
----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Casino.................................................... 31,711,328 31,705,786
Food and beverage......................................... 3,090,421 1,707,142
Rooms..................................................... 528,746 (57,582)
Other operating costs and expenses........................ 1,177,877 1,153,665
Advertising and marketing................................. 9,214,590 8,250,625
General and administrative................................ 6,460,676 6,763,040
Property operation, maintenance and energy cost........... 2,778,102 3,034,439
Rents, property taxes and insurance....................... 2,361,293 1,986,566
Development expenses...................................... 141,607 172,843
Preopening expenses....................................... 681,754 --
Depreciation and amortization............................. 5,352,618 5,313,728
----------- -----------
Total costs and expenses............................... 63,499,012 60,030,252
----------- -----------
Income from operations...................................... 11,812,943 5,927,293
----------- -----------
Other (Income) Expenses:
Equity loss from unconsolidated subsidiary................ 128,658 113,937
Interest expense, net..................................... 7,485,062 8,069,102
Other..................................................... 665,002 (1,235,441)
----------- -----------
Total other expense.................................... 8,278,722 6,947,598
----------- -----------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest of
subsidiary................................................ 3,534,221 (1,020,305)
Income taxes expense........................................ 1,112,173 --
Minority interest........................................... 432,953 201,512
----------- -----------
Net income (loss)........................................... $ 1,989,095 $(1,221,817)
=========== ===========
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic..................................................... $ .06 $ (0.03)
=========== ===========
Diluted................................................... $ .06 $ (0.03)
=========== ===========
Average shares and equivalents outstanding:
Basic..................................................... 35,722,124 35,637,083
=========== ===========
Diluted................................................... 35,892,435 35,637,083
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
<PAGE> 5
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997(*)
-------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 17,470,386 $ 20,986,510
Restricted marketable securities.......................... 11,699,487 10,629,405
Other current assets...................................... 8,927,714 8,124,872
------------ ------------
Total current assets................................. 38,097,587 39,740,787
Property and equipment, net................................. 279,831,475 263,993,452
Other long-term assets...................................... 64,818,117 68,970,578
------------ ------------
$382,747,179 $372,704,817
------------ ------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities......................................... $ 50,806,822 $ 51,031,097
Other long-term liabilities and minority interest........... 8,358,639 8,748,212
Long-term debt, net of current maturities................... 259,545,594 253,471,219
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
35,722,124 issued and outstanding at June 30, 1998 and
December 31, 1997......................................... 357,221 357,221
Undesignated stock, 2,500,000 shares authorized, none
issued.................................................... -- --
Additional paid-in capital.................................. 67,122,856 67,122,852
Retained deficit............................................ (3,294,753) (7,762,270)
Less unearned compensation.................................. (149,200) (263,514)
------------ ------------
Total shareholders' equity........................... 64,036,124 59,454,289
------------ ------------
$382,747,179 $372,704,817
============ ============
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
* Derived from audited financial statements
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
<PAGE> 6
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
----------------------------
1998 1997
---- ----
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)......................................... $ 4,467,523 $ (4,893,526)
Adjustments for non-cash charges.......................... 11,788,196 9,505,514
Changes in assets and liabilities......................... (2,739,797) 6,624,971
------------ ------------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities................... 13,515,922 11,236,959
------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Acquisitions of property and equipment.................... (16,234,648) (20,409,274)
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary and property and
equipment.............................................. -- 8,174,586
Other, net................................................ 588,359 290,874
------------ ------------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities....................... (15,646,289) (11,943,814)
------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Principal payments on notes payable and long-term debt.... (4,216,867) (10,842,560)
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt.............. 2,977,445 6,350,000
Other, net................................................ (146,335) --
------------ ------------
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities....................... (1,385,757) (4,492,560)
------------ ------------
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents................... (3,516,124) (5,199,415)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period.............. 20,986,510 34,546,164
------------ ------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period.................... $ 17,470,386 $ 29,346,749
============ ============
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash Paid During the Period for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized)...................... $ 13,961,006 $ 16,708,321
Income taxes (net of refunds)............................. -- (6,382,324)
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing
Activities:
Property and equipment and other asset acquisitions
included in accounts and construction payable and
accrued expenses....................................... 2,524,626 1,931,566
Property and equipment financed with long-term debt....... 6,142,215 18,079
Reclassification of long-term liabilities to accrued
expenses............................................... -- 170,029
</TABLE>
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
<PAGE> 7
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
1997 IS UNAUDITED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Organization and basis of presentation:
Casino Magic Corp. and Subsidiaries is an international gaming company with
operations in Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi ("Casino Magic-BSL"), Biloxi,
Mississippi ("Casino Magic-Biloxi"), Bossier City, Louisiana ("Casino
Magic-Bossier City"), and the Argentina Province of Neuquen in the cities of
Neuquen City and San Martin de los Andes ("Casino Magic-Neuquen").
Unless the context requires otherwise, reference in this report to the
"Company" means Casino Magic Corp. and its relevant subsidiaries, and reference
to "Casino Magic" means Casino Magic Corp.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Casino Magic
and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair
statement of the results of the interim periods. The results of operations for
the interim periods are not indicative of results of operations for an entire
year. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1997, and Form 10-Q for March 31, 1998.
Certain reclassifications have been made to 1997 amounts to conform with
the June 30, 1998 presentation.
2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
(a) Accounting for Start-Up Costs:
During April 1998, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the
AICPA issued Statement of Position 98-5 ("SOP"), "Reporting on the Costs of
Start-Up Activities." The SOP requires costs of start-up activities and
organization costs to be expensed as incurred. The SOP is effective for
financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. The
company has not adopted the SOP. However, due to the opening of the hotel at
Casino Magic-Biloxi in May 1998, all start-up costs associated with the hotel
have been expensed in the quarter ended June 30, 1998, in accordance with
Company policy.
(b) Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities. The Statement establishes accounting and reporting
standards requiring that every derivative Instrument (including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance
sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The Statement
requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting
for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to offset related
results on the hedged item in the income statement, and requires that a company
must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions
that receive hedge accounting.
Statement 133 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999.
A company may also implement the Statement as of the beginning of any fiscal
quarter after issuance (that is, fiscal quarters beginning June 16, 1998 and
thereafter). Statement 133 cannot be applied retroactively. Statement 133 must
be applied to (a) derivative instruments and (b) certain derivative instruments
embedded in hybrid contracts that were
5
<PAGE> 8
CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
issued, acquired or substantively modified after December 31, 1997 (and, at the
company's election, before January 1, 1998).
The Company's management believes the impact of adopting Statement 133 on
the financial statements is expected to be immaterial.
3. LONG TERM DEBT:
Additions to long-term debt during the first six months of 1998 consist of
the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ENDING
BALANCES AT
JUNE 30, 1998
-------------
<S> <C>
Notes payable, bank(a)............................. $2,850,108
Notes payable, other(b)............................ $6,068,357
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) Consists of one note payable to The Peoples Bank, collateralized by certain
parcels of land, payable in fifty-nine monthly payments of $61,100 including
interest at 8.5% through February 2002 with a final balloon payment of
$60,120 in March 2002.
(b) Consists of five notes payable to Boeing Capital Corp. All notes
collateralized by furniture and equipment used at the 378 room hotel at
Casino Magic-Biloxi. The Notes are as follows:
1) Note in the original balance of $4,347,833, payable in forty-seven
monthly installments of $110,523.04 including interest of 10.12% through
April 2002 with a final balloon payment of $112,400 in May 2002.
2) Note in the original balance of $733,516.63, payable in one
installment of $21,616.66 on July 1, 1998, and forty-seven monthly
installments of $18,714.77 including interest at 10.314% through April
2002.
3) Note in the original balance of $391,024.97, payable in one
installment of $2,885.61 on August 1, 1998, and forty-eight installments of
$9,958.37 including interest at 10.2179% through August 2002.
4) Note in the original balance of $328,148.41, payable in one
installment of $1,769.63 on July 1, 1998, and forty-eight monthly
installments of $8,357.07 including interest at 10.2179% through August
2001.
5) Note in the original balance of $341,692.16, payable in
forty-eight monthly installments beginning July 1, 1998, of $8,674.42
including interest at 10.2179% through June 2001.
6
<PAGE> 9
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The discussions regarding proposed Company developments and operations
included in "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS" contain forward looking statements that involve a number
of risks and uncertainties. These proposed developments and operations include:
(i) completion of a hotel in 1998 at Casino Magic-Bossier City and (ii) the
Company's ability to fund planned developments and debt service obligations over
the next twelve months with currently available cash, marketable securities and
cash flow from operations. In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed
below, other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are
detailed from time to time in the Company's reports filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including without limitation in Note 1 of Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
Casino Magic Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1997.
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain operating
information for the Company on a consolidated basis and for its existing
properties. The principal operating entities are Mardi Gras Casino Corp.
("Casino Magic-BSL") and Biloxi Casino Corp. ("Casino Magic-Biloxi"), both
dockside casinos operating on the Gulf Coast of Mississippi (together referred
to collectively as the "Casino Magic-Gulf Coast"), Casino Magic of Louisiana,
Corp. ("Casino Magic-Bossier City") and Casino Magic-Neuquen SA, which operates
gaming facilities at two casino sites in Neuquen and San Martin de los Andes,
Argentina.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------ --------------------
1998 1997 1998 1997
---- ---- ---- ----
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Casino Magic -- BSL(1).............................. $23,944 $23,503 $ 47,163 $ 45,569
Casino Magic -- Biloxi(2)........................... 19,263 16,567 35,513 32,659
Casino Magic -- Bossier City(3)..................... 26,844 21,519 54,772 44,726
Casino Magic -- Neuquen............................. 5,258 4,369 10,042 8,784
Corporate and Other................................. 2 -- 7 --
------- ------- -------- --------
Total revenues................................. 75,311 65,958 147,497 131,738
Costs and expenses:
Casino Magic -- BSL(1).............................. 18,585 18,821 36,963 37,069
Casino Magic -- Biloxi(2)........................... 17,572 14,961 32,907 29,670
Casino Magic -- Bossier City(3)..................... 22,231 21,190 44,965 46,497
Casino Magic -- Neuquen............................. 3,378 3,303 6,692 6,386
Corporate and Other................................. 1,733 1,756 3,202 4,192
------- ------- -------- --------
Total costs and expenses....................... 63,499 60,031 124,729 123,814
Income (loss) from operations:
Casino Magic -- BSL(1).............................. 5,359 4,683 10,200 8,501
Casino Magic -- Biloxi(2)........................... 1,691 1,606 2,606 2,989
Casino Magic -- Bossier City(3)..................... 4,613 329 9,807 (1,771)
Casino Magic -- Neuquen............................. 1,880 1,065 3,350 2,398
Corporate and Other................................. (1,730) (1,756) (3,195) (4,192)
------- ------- -------- --------
Total income from operations................... $11,813 $ 5,927 $ 22,768 $ 7,925
======= ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Began operations September 30, 1992; expanded casino capacity December 31,
1992.
(2) Began operations June 5, 1993; expanded casino capacity December 16, 1993.
(3) Began operations October 4, 1996; opened permanent facility on December 31,
1996.
7
<PAGE> 10
Three months ended June 30, 1998 compared to three months ended June 30, 1997.
Consolidated revenues increased $9.4 million, or 14.2%, to $75.3 in the
second quarter of 1998, compared to $65.9 million in the second quarter of 1997.
The increase in consolidated revenues is attributable to increased revenues at
all five casinos operated by the Company. The largest individual increase of
$5.3 million, between the comparable periods, occurred at Casino Magic-Bossier
City. The increase at Casino Magic-Bossier City is attributable to improved
marketing efforts and an overall increase in the Bossier City/ Shreveport,
Louisiana gaming market of $17.5 million, to $144.7 million or 13.8%, between
the comparable periods. In addition, Casino Magic-Bossier City's market share
for the second quarter of 1998 was 18.5% compared to 16.5% in the second quarter
of 1997. With the opening of the 378 room hotel at Casino Magic-Biloxi,,
revenues increased $2.7 million to $19.3 million in the second quarter of 1998
as compared to $16.6 in the second quarter of 1997. At the Company's operations
in Argentina, slot machine revenues continue to improve due to an increase in
the number of slot machines and continued popularity of slot machines and
American style gaming.
Operating costs and expenses increased $3.5 million, or 5.8%, to $63.5
million in the second quarter of 1998 as compared to $60.0 million in the second
quarter of 1997. Advertising and marketing costs increased $1.0 million. or
12.2%, to $9.2 million in the second quarter of 1998, compared to $8.2 million
in the second quarter of 1997. This increase is due primarily to the opening of
the new hotel at Casino Magic-Biloxi, as well as, increased marketing efforts at
Casino Magic-Bossier City. Other significant increases, related to the new hotel
and incurred in the second quarter of 1998, are pre-opening costs of $0.7
million and room expenses of $0.5 million.
Other (income) expense (non-operating income and expenses) increased to a
net expense of $8.3 million in the second quarter 1998 as compared to $6.9
million in the second quarter of 1997. This increase in net expense is due to
$0.7 million in expenses in 1998 related to the proposed merger between the
Company and Hollywood Park, Inc., a $0.5 million increase in the capitalization
of interest in 1998 relating to debt incurred in the construction of the
Company's Biloxi hotel, and a gain in 1997 relating to the sale of a minority
interest in the Company's Argentina casinos.
Income tax expense recorded in the second quarter of 1998 is foreign tax
related.
Six months ended June 30, 1998 compared to six months ended June 30, 1997.
Consolidated revenues increased $15.8 million, or 12%, to $147.5 in the
first six months of 1998, compared to $131.7 million in the first six months of
1997. The increase in consolidated revenues is attributable to increased
revenues at all five casinos operated by the Company. The largest individual
increase of $10.0 million, between the comparable periods, occurred at Casino
Magic-Bossier City. The increase at Casino Magic-Bossier City is attributable to
improved marketing efforts and an overall increase in gaming revenue in the
Bossier City/Shreveport, Louisiana market of 13.8%, between the comparable
periods. In addition, Casino Magic-Bossier City's market share for the first six
months of 1998 was 18.5% compared to 16.7% in the first six months of 1997.
Revenues at Casino Magic-Biloxi increased $2.7 million due primarily to the
recent opening of the Company's Biloxi hotel. At the Company's operations in
Argentina, slot machine revenues continue to improve due to an increase in the
number of slot machines and continued popularity of slot machines and American
style gaming.
Operating costs and expenses increased $0.9 million, or 0.7%, to $124.7
million in the first six months of 1998 as compared to $123.8 million in the
first six months of 1997. Casino expenses increased by $5.6 million, or 9.6%,
due to increases in gaming taxes related to increased gaming revenues, increased
personnel costs related to the increased gaming volume and an increase in slot
point redemption values. Advertising and marketing costs declined $3.4 million,
to $17.9 million in the first six months of 1998, compared to $21.4 million in
the first six months of 1997. During the first six months of 1997 at Casino
Magic-Bossier City the Company attempted to increase market share and revenue
with expensive promotions which were significantly less successful than
anticipated. In May 1997 the promotional programs at Casino Magic-Bossier City
were significantly reduced.
8
<PAGE> 11
Other (income) expense (non-operating income and expenses) increased to a
net expense of $16.3 million in the first six months 1998 as compared to $14.5
million in the first six months of 1997. This increase in net expense is due in
part to $1.1 million in expenses related to the pending merger between the
Company and Hollywood Park, Inc. There were no expenses in the first six months
of 1997 relating to merger costs.
Income tax expense recorded in the second quarter of 1998 is foreign tax
related.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At June 30, 1998, the Company had unrestricted cash of $17.5 million
compared to unrestricted cash of $21.0 million at December 31, 1997. In
addition, the Company had $11.7 million and $10.6 million in restricted cash and
marketable securities at June 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997, respectively,
which is restricted as to its use under the indenture relating to $115,000,000
of First Mortgage Notes issued by Jefferson Casino Corp. The restricted cash and
securities held as of June 30, 1998, were received from the sale of the Crescent
City Riverboat for $11.7 million. For the quarter ended June 30, 1998, the
Company received $13.5 million of cash flow from operating activities and
received $3.0 million of proceeds from the incurrence of long term debt. The
Company spent $15.6 million in net investment activities including, primarily,
the acquisition of property, equipment and other long-term assets, and reduced
long term debt by $4.2 million.
The Company expended approximately $9.5 million primarily for capital
improvements at Casino Magic-Biloxi, and $5.0 million for capital improvements
at Casino Magic-Bossier City during the second quarter of 1998. The Company
plans additional capital improvements in 1998 at its Gulf Coast properties and
at Casino Magic-Bossier City, much of which is subject to the cash flows of the
Company or the availability of financing. There are no assurances that adequate
funding will be available for these planned investments.
At Casino Magic-Bossier City, the Company commenced expansion of the land
based pavilion and construction of a 188-room convention hotel, including
restaurants and a swimming pool. The construction of the hotel is expected to be
funded primarily by $11.7 million of restricted cash obtained as a result of the
sale of the Crescent City Riverboat, current unrestricted cash on hand, future
operating cash flow of Casino Magic-Bossier City and financing for furniture,
fixtures and equipment. The hotel is expected to open by the end of 1998. No
assurances can be given that the cash on hand and the cash flow from the
operations of Casino Magic-Bossier City will be sufficient to complete such
hotel and related facilities or that these improvements will ever be developed.
On May 1, 1998, the Company opened the hotel tower at Casino Magic-Biloxi
above the eight-story parking garage adjacent to the casino. The hotel consists
of 378 rooms, including 86 suites, and includes a health spa, beauty salon,
swimming pool and conference space. The hotel construction costs have been
funded out of the cash flow of Casino Magic-BSL and Casino Magic-Biloxi, and the
$7.0 million in proceeds from the sale of a 49% ownership interest in Casino
Magic-Neuquen. The Company has also obtained debt financing of the furniture,
fixtures and equipment for the Casino Magic-Biloxi hotel in the amount of $6.5
million and an additional $1.0 million for signage.
Under the terms of the Indenture associated with the $135,000,000 First
Mortgage Notes, Casino Magic Corp., Mardi Gras Casino Corp., Biloxi Casino Corp.
and Casino Magic Finance Corp. have certain restrictions relative to additional
borrowings and guarantees. Jefferson Casino Corp and Casino Magic of Louisiana,
Corp. have certain restrictions relative to additional borrowings and cash flow
under the terms of the Indenture associated with the $115,000,000 First Mortgage
Notes.
The Company's operations in Argentina are subject to certain risks
including foreign currency exchange, repatriation of earnings and profits, and
adverse foreign tax treatment. In addition, the Company will incur the general
business risk associated with operating in a foreign county where culture and
business practices may vary significantly from that in the United States. Such
risks could have a material impact on the operating results and liquidity of the
Company.
9
<PAGE> 12
The Company will have a significant need for cash in 1998 and beyond in
order to continue its planned development of its existing properties. The
Company believes that cash and restricted marketable securities at June 30,
1998, and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to service its operating
and debt service requirements, through at least the next twelve months,
including the remaining planned improvements at Casino Magic-Biloxi and the
completion of the construction of the Casino Magic-Bossier City hotel.
10
<PAGE> 13
PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Reference is made to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
During the first six months ended June 30, 1998, the Company was not a party to
any newly instituted legal proceedings. The Company did incur one significant
development during such period to existing legal proceedings, in that, the trial
date for the litigation with Casino America, Inc. has been postponed to mid-1999
resulting from the Plaintiff's request for a continuance.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
27 Financial data schedule (filed electronically only)
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None.
11
<PAGE> 14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CASINO MAGIC CORP.
/s/ JAMES E. ERNST
--------------------------------------
James E. Ernst, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 3, 1998
/s/ JAY S. OSMAN
--------------------------------------
Jay S. Osman, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(principal financial and accounting
officer)
Date: August 3, 1998
12
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1998, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASINO MAGIC CORP. AND ITS
SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1998
<CASH> 17,470,386
<SECURITIES> 11,699,487
<RECEIVABLES> 3,648,060
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 1,129,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 38,097,587
<PP&E> 346,367,047
<DEPRECIATION> 66,535,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 382,747,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 50,806,822
<BONDS> 259,545,594
0
0
<COMMON> 357,221
<OTHER-SE> 66,973,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 382,747,179
<SALES> 147,497,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 147,497,856
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 124,730,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 1,355,717
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 14,980,269
<INCOME-PRETAX> 6,431,469
<INCOME-TAX> 1,112,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 4,467,523
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 4,467,523
<EPS-PRIMARY> .13
<EPS-DILUTED> .12
</TABLE>
