|
Previous: JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST, N-30D, 2000-02-28 |
Next: GENERAL AMERICAN SEPARATE ACCOUNT TWENTY NINE, NSAR-U, 2000-02-28 |
ANNUAL REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1999
JOHNSON
Mutual Funds
| Johnson Growth Fund | |
| Johnson Opportunity Fund | |
| Johnson Realty Fund | |
| Johnson Fixed Income Fund | |
| Johnson Municipal Income Fund |
INVESTMENT ADVISER:
Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc.
3777 West Fork Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45247
513-661-3100
800-541-0170
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS December 31, 1999
Table of Contents
Our Message to You | 1 | |||
Performance Review and Management Discussion | ||||
Growth Fund | 2 | |||
Opportunity Fund | 3 | |||
Realty Fund | 4 | |||
Fixed Income Fund | 5 | |||
Municipal Income Fund | 6 | |||
Portfolio of Investments | ||||
Growth Fund | 7-8 | |||
Opportunity Fund | 9-10 | |||
Realty Fund | 11 | |||
Fixed Income Fund | 12-14 | |||
Municipal Income Fund | 15-16 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 17 | |||
Statement of Operations | 18 | |||
Statement of Change in Net Assets | ||||
Stock Funds | 19 | |||
Bond Funds | 20 | |||
Financial Highlights | ||||
Growth Fund | 21 | |||
Opportunity Fund | 22 | |||
Realty Fund | 23 | |||
Fixed Income Fund | 24 | |||
Municipal Income Fund | 25 | |||
Notes to the Financial Statements | 26-28 | |||
Report of the Independent Auditors | 29 | |||
Trustees, Officers, Transfer Agent, Fund Accountant Custodian, Auditors, Legal Counsel | Back Page |
OUR MESSAGE TO YOU
February 23, 2000
Dear Shareholder:
The stock market rebounded in the fourth quarter of 1999, contributing significantly to the volatility and the wide disparity in returns for individual stocks for the year. While the Standard & Poors 500 Index experienced another strong year with returns of 21%, only seven stocks accounted for one-half of the entire years return. The market continued its narrow participation, with the average stock declining for the year. As we now move into late February 2000, the average stock in the S&P 500 Index has declined over 25% from its previous 52-week high. The underlying market has been very weak, overshadowed by the huge gains in the technology sector. Nevertheless, the economy continues its very healthy growth and stocks should continue to add positive returns over the long run.
Rising interest rates continued to plague the bond market with rates at their highest point and prices at their lowest point for the year ending December 31, 1999. It was the third worst year for the bond market since 1926. Nevertheless, our Municipal Income Fund was the number one fund among all 51 Ohio bond funds, according to Lipper, Inc.
The first five pages of this report include a review of each of the Funds performance for 1999. The remainder of the annual report lists stocks and bonds that are held in each of the Funds, as well as other fundamental data and notes. We continue to structure all portfolios to provide solid long term returns commensurate with appropriate risk.
We hope that as you review this annual report, you feel free to call with any questions you may have. It is a pleasure serving your investment needs.
Sincerely, | |
/s/ Timothy E. Johnson | |
Timothy E. Johnson,
President Johnson Mutual Funds |
1
GROWTH FUND Performance Review - December 31, 1999
[GRAPH]
Growth | S&P 500 | |||||||
Fund | Index | |||||||
1992 | $ | 10,000.00 | $ | 10,000.00 | ||||
1993 | $ | 10,596.78 | $ | 11,009.82 | ||||
1994 | $ | 10,149.85 | $ | 11,154.61 | ||||
1995 | $ | 13,368.55 | $ | 16,341.63 | ||||
1996 | $ | 15,609.73 | $ | 16,661.69 | ||||
1997 | $ | 20,911.03 | $ | 25,152,93 | ||||
1998 | $ | 26,995.43 | $ | 32,341.35 | ||||
1999 | $ | 20,047.68 | $ | 38,691.00 |
For periods ending December 31, 1999:
Average Annual Total Returns (a) | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 7 Years (b) | |||||||||||||||||
Growth Fund | 11.31 | % | 24.40 | % | 24.23 | % | 17.04 | % | ||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 21.04 | % | 27.56 | % | 28.55 | % | 21.44 | % |
(a) | The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Standard & Poors 500 Index. | |
(b) | Inception of the Growth Fund was January 4, 1993. |
% As of | % As of | |||||||
Top Ten Holdings: | 12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | ||||||
Cicso Systems | 4.1 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||
EMC Corporation | 3.9 | % | 3.5 | % | ||||
General Electric | 3.8 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||
Microsoft Corporation | 3.8 | % | 3.4 | % | ||||
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | 3.4 | % | 2.4 | %* | ||||
Exxon Mobil Corporation | 3.0 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||
Lexmark Intl Group | 2.8 | % | 2.4 | %* | ||||
MCI WorldCom, Inc. | 2.8 | % | 0.0 | %* | ||||
Intel Corporation | 2.7 | % | 2.4 | %* | ||||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2.7 | % | 0.0 | %* |
* | Not in Top 10 as of 12/31/98. |
How did the Growth Fund perform relative to the market?
The rate of return on the Growth Fund was 11.31% in 1999, compared to a return of 21.04% for the Standard and Poors 500 Index (S & P 500). The underperformance of the Fund relative to the S&P 500s return occurred during the first half of 1999 when value stocks outperformed growth stocks. For the most recent six month period, the Growth Fund returned 8.51% compared to 7.71% on the S&P 500 Index.
The Growth Fund continues to be invested in a diversified manner and with a sensitivity to valuation parameters. As an example, the largest sector weighting in the Growth Fund is in technology at 31%. That compares with a technology weighting of 30% for the S&P 500 Index. However, the dollar weighted price-earnings ratio for the Growth Funds technology stocks is 66 compared to 102 for the technology stocks in the S&P 500 Index. Should investors lose some of their enthusiasm for technology stocks, the advisor believes that the disparity should provide relative downside protection to the Growth Fund.
If the year 2000 is a repeat of 1999, with most of the positive performance concentrated in technology and internet related stocks with historically high valuations, then a conservative, diversified portfolio such as the Growth Fund will likely lag index returns. However, any broadening in market performance away from technology stocks could benefit portfolios such as the Growth Fund. The advisor believes that the more conservative valuations in the Growth Fund should also be beneficial to relative performance in the event of a significant market correction.
Growth Fund
Objective:
Long-Term
Capital Growth
Primary Asset Category:
Stocks of Larger-Sized Growth Companies
2
OPPORTUNITY FUND Performance Review - December 31, 1999
[GRAPH]
Opportunity Fund | S & P MidCap Index | |||||||
1993 | $ | 10,000.00 | $ | 10,000.00 | ||||
1994 | $ | 10,499.06 | $ | 10,413.99 | ||||
1995 | $ | 13,152.19 | $ | 13,636.63 | ||||
1996 | $ | 16,190.33 | $ | 16,258.84 | ||||
1997 | $ | 20,603.88 | $ | 21,499.92 | ||||
1998 | $ | 24,503.93 | $ | 25,465.00 | ||||
1999 | $ | 27,604.79 | $ | 29,233.00 |
For periods ending December 31, 1999:
Average Annual Total Return (a) | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 5.6 Years (b) | |||||||||||||
Opportunity Fund | 12.65 | % | 19.47 | % | 21.33 | % | 19.76 | % | ||||||||
S&P MidCap Index | 14.70 | % | 21.79 | % | 23.04 | % | 20.99 | % |
(a) | The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Standard & Poors MidCap Index. | |
(b) | Inception of the Opportunity Fund was May 16, 1994. |
% As of | % As of | |||||||
Top Ten Holdings: | 12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | ||||||
EMC Corporation | 5.7 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||
BMC Software | 4.6 | % | 1.8 | %* | ||||
Vitesse Semiconductor | 3.5 | % | 2.5 | %* | ||||
Gap, Inc. | 3.4 | % | 2.5 | %* | ||||
Tandy Corporation | 3.4 | % | 1.1 | %* | ||||
Century Telephone | 3.3 | % | 2.7 | %* | ||||
Teradyne Inc. | 3.3 | % | 0.0 | %* | ||||
Lexmark Intl Group | 2.8 | % | 2.7 | % | ||||
Altera Corporation | 2.6 | % | 1.9 | %* | ||||
Forest Laboratories | 3.0 | % | 2.7 | %* |
| Not in Top 10 as of 12/31/98. |
How did the Opportunity Fund perform relative to the market?
The Opportunity Fund had a return in 1999 of 12.65% compared to a return of 14.70% on the Standard & Poors Midcap Index (Midcap Index). As in the large-cap arena, growth stocks performed better than value stocks for the year in the midcap sector. More specifically, the technology and communication services sectors dominated the Midcap Index returns. The modest underperformance of the Opportunity Fund relative to the Index in 1999 was more related to stock specific issues than to sector allocation.
At year-end, technology stocks represented the largest industry weighting in the fund at about 31% as compared to the Midcap Indexs technology weight of about 27%. The overweight in the Fund was additive to its performance for the year. Relative to the Midcap Index, the most significant industry overweight for the Opportunity Fund was in consumer cyclical stocks. The Fund had 20% of the portfolio invested in the sector versus 15% for the Index. Tandy and The Gap were the largest of the holdings, each at 3.4% of the portfolio at year-end. Both stocks were good performers during the year.
As in the large-cap sector of the market, a broadening in performance away from technology stocks would be beneficial to the overall health of the market and probably to the relative performance of the Opportunity Fund.
Opportunity Fund Objective: | Long-Term Capital Appreciation | |||
Primary Asset Category: | Stocks of Medium/Small-Sized Growth Companies |
3
REALTY FUND Performance Review - December 31, 1999
[GRAPH]
Realty Fund | NAREIT Index | |||||||
1997 | $ | 10,000.00 | $ | 10,000.00 | ||||
1998 | $ | 6,143.90 | $ | 6,250.00 | ||||
1999 | $ | 7,942.45 | $ | 7,869.00 |
For periods ending December 31, 1999:
Average Annual Total Returns (a) | ||||||
1 Year | 2 Years (b) | |||||
Realty Fund | -2.47% | -10.91% | ||||
NAREIT Index | -4.62% | -11.32% |
(a) | The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the NAREIT Index. | |
(b) | Inception of the Realty Fund was January 2, 1998. | |
(c) | Performance for the Realty Fund and the NAREIT Index are so similar that it is difficult to discern the two distinct lines. |
% As of | % As of | |||||||
Top Ten Holdings: | 12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | ||||||
Apartment Investment Mgt | 4.6 | % | 3.9 | %* | ||||
Avalon Bay Comm. Inc. | 4.4 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||
Vornado Realty Trust | 4.2 | % | 0.0 | %* | ||||
First Industrial Realty | 4.1 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||
Duke-Weeks Realty | 4.0 | % | 0.0 | %* | ||||
Equity Office Property Trust | 3.9 | % | 0.0 | %* | ||||
Kimco Realty | 3.9 | % | 0.0 | %* | ||||
Essex Property Trust Inc. | 3.8 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||
Simon Property Group, Inc. | 3.8 | % | 4.4 | % | ||||
Boston Properties, Inc. | 3.8 | % | 4.3 | % |
* | Not in the Top 10 as of 12/31/98. |
How did the Realty Fund perform relative to the market?
The Johnson Realty Fund had a rate of return of -2.47% in 1999 which compares to a return of -4.62% for the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust Index (NAREIT Index). The real estate investment trust (REIT) stocks fell victim to rising interest rates and lackluster interest from the investment community. REITs are very capital intensive companies, thus higher interest rates dampen their ability to effectively borrow. Additionally, weak stock performance for REITSs over the past two years has all but eliminated the equity market as a financing source. REITs with the strongest balance sheets and best properties perform best in this type of market.
The equity market in 1999 was very concentrated on growth, while technology stocks led the broad indices to all time highs. Also in 1999, the disparity between the haves and have nots became even greater and the have nots were clearly the more value-oriented stocks. REITs, with their relative valuations and high dividends, clearly were placed in this category. The lack of interest by the investment community, combined with the higher cost of financing for REIT projects drove REIT stocks to all time valuation lows. At the beginning of 1999 the average dividend yield of the NAREIT Index was 7.5%, increasing to 8.7% by the end of the year. In December, in recognition of REITs relative valuation, Warren Buffet once again affirmed his belief in REITs long term prospects by giving a stock tip to investors to buy them. December 1999 was the second best month for REIT performance, up 3.2%, following the other Buffet-induced rally in April 1999 of 9.5%.
The Realty Fund utilizes a conservative quality approach when selecting individual securities. The combination of macroeconomic factors and in-depth bottom up analysis is utilized in construction of the portfolio. The strategy employed to select securities starts with targeting stocks with above average growth prospects within their peer groups. The growth must be predicated on solid financials and a strong management team. In 1999 the best performing property type was residential, registering a 9.48% total rate of return and comprising nearly 21% of the overall market weighting. The worst performing group was specialty real estate, which posted a 26% decline.
Realty Fund Objective: | Long-Term Capital Growth and Above Average Income | |||
Primary Asset Category: | Real Estate Related Equity Securities |
4
FIXED INCOME FUND | Performance Review - December 31, 1999 |
[GRAPH]
Fixed | Lehman Intermediate | |||||||
Income | Government Corporate | |||||||
Fund | Index | |||||||
1992 | $ | 10,000.00 | $ | 10,000.00 | ||||
1993 | $ | 10,954.49 | $ | 10,832.80 | ||||
1994 | $ | 10,391.95 | $ | 10,623.67 | ||||
1995 | $ | 12,231.14 | $ | 12,253.00 | ||||
1996 | $ | 12,611.58 | $ | 12,749.00 | ||||
1997 | $ | 13,675.89 | $ | 13,752.00 | ||||
1998 | $ | 14,913.16 | $ | 14,912.00 | ||||
1999 | $ | 14,363.71 | $ | 14,969.00 |
For periods ending December 31, 1999:
Average Annual Total Returns (a) | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 7 Years (b) | |||||||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | -3.68 | % | 4.43 | % | 6.69 | % | 5.32 | % | ||||||||
Lehman Int. G/C Index | 0.39 | % | 5.49 | % | 7.09 | % | 5.94 | % |
(a) | The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Lehman Brothers Intermediate Government Corporate Bond Index. | |
(b) | Inception of the Fixed Income Fund was January 4, 1993. |
[GRAPH]
QUALITY ALLOCATION | |||||||||
AAA | 43.2 | % | |||||||
AA | 6.5 | % | |||||||
A | 41.6 | % | |||||||
BBB | 8.7 | % | |||||||
How did the Fixed Income Fund perform relative to the market?
The Fixed Income Fund had a rate of return of -3.68% for 1999 compared to a return of 0.39% for the Lehman Brothers Intermediate Government/Corporate Bond Index. In the beginning of the year, investors were worried about worldwide economic turmoil and expected the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates to bolster faltering global economies. Instead, global economies recovered sharply from 1998s depressed levels and the Fed shifted to a tightening mode. The Fed decided to raise short-term interest rates by 0.75% during the year as it focused on recovering global economies, a robust U.S. economy, and tight domestic labor markets. Bond market sentiment turned decidedly negative with the backdrop of Fed tightening and inflation worries returned to the forefront of investor concerns. These shifts in the economic environment and market sentiment also helped to drive interest rates sharply higher during the year. Interest rates rose by more than 1 1/2% for intermediate maturity Treasury bonds, causing sub-par total returns for most sectors of the bond market.
This environment proved challenging for the Fixed Income Fund relative to the Lehman Brothers Intermediate Government/Corporate Bond Index. The relative performance of the Fund was negatively impacted by several factors. First, the longer duration of the Fund relative to the Index was not helpful in the rising interest rate environment. Next, the intermediate maturity focus of the Fund was unfavorable as yields on intermediate maturity bonds rose more than yields on either short or long maturity bonds, driving their prices down. Finally, low quality sharply outperformed high quality, so the Funds high quality emphasis was a third factor hindering performance for the year. These appear to be temporary factors driven by short-term phenomenon and they should reverse themselves over a longer-term time horizon.
The Fixed Income Fund continues its focus on high-quality securities. Each security within the Fund is rated investment-grade quality by both Moodys and Standard and Poors, with over 90% of the assets rated A or better as indicated in the Quality Allocation Chart on this page. These highly rated securities are considered to have adequate to strong protection of principal and interest payments, and will help provide a stable portfolio valuation as economic circumstances change in the future.
Fixed Income Fund Objective: | Income and Capital Preservation | |||
Primary Asset Category: | Investment-Grade Government/Corporate Bonds |
5
MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND | Performance Review - December 31, 1999 |
[GRAPH]
Lehman Five-Year | ||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | G.O. Municipal Index | |||||||
1993 | $ | 10,000.00 | $ | 10,000.00 | ||||
1994 | $ | 10,061.20 | $ | 10,117.49 | ||||
1995 | $ | 11,177.62 | $ | 11,295.13 | ||||
1996 | $ | 11,560.82 | $ | 11,819.00 | ||||
1997 | $ | 12,281.38 | $ | 12,586.00 | ||||
1998 | $ | 12,919.37 | $ | 13,322.00 | ||||
1999 | $ | 12,759.74 | $ | 13,415.00 |
For periods ending December 31, 1999: | Average Annual Total Returns (a) | |||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 5.6 Years (b) | |||||||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | -1.24 | % | 3.34 | % | 4.83 | % | 4.42 | % | ||||||||
Lehman 5 Yr. G.O. Index | 0.71 | % | 4.31 | % | 5.81 | % | 5.35 | % |
(a) | The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Lehman Five-Year General Obligation Municipal Index. | |
(b) | Inception of the Municipal Income Fund was May 16, 1994. |
[GRAPH]
Quality Allocation | ||||||||
AAA | 55.1 | % | ||
AA | 18.8 | % | ||
A | 17.4 | % | ||
NR | 8.7 | % | ||
How did the Municipal Income Fund perform relative to the market?
The Municipal Income Fund had a rate of return of - 1.24 % for 1999 compared to a return of 0.71% for the Lehman Five-Year General Obligation Index. The Funds longer duration than that of the Index hampered its relative performance. However, due to its intermediate maturity focus, the Fund was able to outperform the overall municipal market and many municipal bond mutual funds, which are more heavily weighted toward longer maturity bonds.
Municipal bond yields now stand at levels that are very attractive relative to Treasury bonds. Investors in all but the very lowest tax brackets pick-up substantial after-tax yield in municipal bonds versus taxable bonds. With supply of municipal bonds at such low levels, due to a substantial drop-off in refunding activity, any incremental pick-up in demand should lead to relative outperformance as compared to Treasuries.
As has been the case since its inception, the credit quality of the Municipal Income Fund remains very high. Over 50% of the securities in the Fund are rated AAA, the highest rating category, with over 90% of assets rated in the highest three rating categories AAA, AA, and A. Over 98% of the income generated by the Fund is from Ohio municipal bonds, so most of the income earned is exempt from Ohio State Income Tax in addition to being exempt from Federal Income Taxes.
Municipal Income Fund Objective: | Tax-Free Income and Capital Preservation | |||
Primary Asset Category: | Intermediate-Term Ohio Municipal Bonds |
6
GROWTH FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | ||||||||
Aerospace | ||||||||||
General Dynamics Corporation | 20,000 | 1,055,000 | ||||||||
Total Aerospace - 1.7% | $ | 1,055,000 | ||||||||
Beverage | ||||||||||
Coca-Cola Enterprises | 37,300 | 750,663 | ||||||||
Total Beverage - 1.2% | $ | 750,663 | ||||||||
Computer Hardware | ||||||||||
Sun Microsystems Inc.* | 27,080 | 2,097,007 | ||||||||
Total Computer Hardware - 3.4% | $ | 2,097,007 | ||||||||
Computer Networking | ||||||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.* | 23,800 | 2,549,575 | ||||||||
Total Computer Networking - 4.1% | $ | 2,549,575 | ||||||||
Computer Peripheral | ||||||||||
EMC Corporation* | 22,200 | 2,425,350 | ||||||||
Lexmark International Group* | 17,000 | 1,538,500 | ||||||||
Total Computer Peripheral - 6.4% | $ | 3,963,850 | ||||||||
Computer Software | ||||||||||
Computer Associates Int., Inc. | 21,400 | 1,496,663 | ||||||||
Microsoft Corporation* | 20,400 | 2,381,700 | ||||||||
Total Computer Software - 6.3% | $ | 3,878,363 | ||||||||
Computer Software - Services | ||||||||||
America Online Inc.* | 9,000 | 678,938 | ||||||||
Compuware Corporation* | 44,000 | 1,639,000 | ||||||||
Total Computer | ||||||||||
Software - Services - 3.7% | $ | 2,317,938 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment | ||||||||||
General Electric Company | 15,230 | 2,356,843 | ||||||||
Total Electrical Equipment - 3.8% | $ | 2,356,843 | ||||||||
Electronics - Semi - Conductors | ||||||||||
Intel Corporation | 20,000 | 1,646,250 | ||||||||
Texas Instruments | 6,000 | 581,250 | ||||||||
Total Electronics - | ||||||||||
Semi - Conductors - 3.6% | $ | 2,227,500 | ||||||||
Financial - Miscellaneous | ||||||||||
American Express Company | 9,200 | 1,529,500 | ||||||||
Fannie Mae | 25,500 | 1,592,156 | ||||||||
Total Financial - | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous - 5.0% | $ | 3,121,656 | ||||||||
Financial - Regional Banks | ||||||||||
Bank of NY Co., Inc. | 33,000 | 1,320,000 | ||||||||
Comerica Inc. | 21,250 | 992,109 | ||||||||
Fifth Third Bancorp | 18,000 | 1,320,750 | ||||||||
Firstar Corporation | 54,000 | 1,140,750 | ||||||||
Total Financial - Reg. Banks - 7.7% | $ | 4,773,609 | ||||||||
Food Retailers | ||||||||||
Sysco Corporation | 31,190 | 1,233,954 | ||||||||
Total Food Retailers - 2.0% | $ | 1,233,954 | ||||||||
Health Care - Diverse | ||||||||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 18,000 | 1,155,375 | ||||||||
Total Health Care-Diverse - 1.9% | $ | 1,155,375 | ||||||||
Health Care Products | ||||||||||
Johnson and Johnson | 12,200 | 1,136,125 | ||||||||
Medtronic Corporation | 30,870 | 1,124,826 | ||||||||
Total Health Care Products - 3.6% | $ | 2,260,951 | ||||||||
Health Care - Drugs | ||||||||||
Merck and Company | 15,600 | 1,046,175 | ||||||||
Pfizer, Inc. | 30,300 | 982,856 | ||||||||
Schering-Plough Corporation | 24,000 | 1,012,500 | ||||||||
Smithkline Beecham PLC ADR | 17,200 | 1,108,325 | ||||||||
Total Health Care - Drugs - 6.7% | $ | 4,149,856 |
* Non-income producing security.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
7
GROWTH FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | ||||||||||
Household Products | ||||||||||||
Procter & Gamble Company | 11,900 | 1,303,794 | ||||||||||
Total Household Products - 2.1% | $ | 1,303,794 | ||||||||||
Industrial Services | ||||||||||||
Cintas Corporation | 23,000 | 1,221,875 | ||||||||||
Total Industrial Services - 2.0% | $ | 1,221,875 | ||||||||||
Manufacturing | ||||||||||||
Dover Corporation | 32,840 | 1,490,115 | ||||||||||
Total Manufacturing - 2.4% | $ | 1,490,115 | ||||||||||
Oil - Domestic | ||||||||||||
Marathon Group Inc. (USX) | 35,325 | 872,086 | ||||||||||
Total Oil - Domestic- 1.4% | $ | 872,086 | ||||||||||
Oil - International | ||||||||||||
Exxon Mobil Corporation | 22,891 | 1,844,156 | ||||||||||
Royal Dutch Petrolem | 19,000 | 1,148,312 | ||||||||||
Total Oil - International - 4.8% | $ | 2,992,468 | ||||||||||
Oil & Gas - Drilling & Equipment | ||||||||||||
Halliburton Company | 32,000 | 1,288,000 | ||||||||||
Total Oil & Gas - | ||||||||||||
Drilling & Equipment - 2.1% | $ | 1,288,000 | ||||||||||
Retailing | ||||||||||||
Circuit City Stores | 28,000 | 1,261,750 | ||||||||||
Dayton Hudson Corp. | 16,000 | 1,175,000 | ||||||||||
Kroger Company* | 63,000 | 1,189,125 | ||||||||||
Lowes Company, Inc. | 23,600 | 1,410,100 | ||||||||||
Staples Inc.* | 51,207 | 1,062,545 | ||||||||||
Walgreen Company | 52,500 | 1,535,625 | ||||||||||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 24,000 | 1,659,000 | ||||||||||
Total Retailing - 15.0% | $ | 9,293,145 | ||||||||||
Telecommunication Equipment | ||||||||||||
Lucent Technology, Inc. | 19,300 | 1,443,881 | ||||||||||
Total Telecom. Equipment - 2.3% | $ | 1,443,881 | ||||||||||
Telecommunication - Long Distance | ||||||||||||
AT & T Corporation | 21,000 | 1,065,750 | ||||||||||
MCI Worldcom, Inc.* | 32,700 | 1,735,144 | ||||||||||
Total Telecommunication - | ||||||||||||
Long Distance - 4.5% | $ | 2,800,894 | ||||||||||
Total Common Stocks - 97.7% | $ | 60,598,398 | ||||||||||
(Common Stock Identified | ||||||||||||
Cost $38,387,478) | ||||||||||||
Cash Equivalents | ||||||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves | ||||||||||||
Money Market Fund | 1,402,831 | |||||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents - 2.3% | $ | 1,402,831 | ||||||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified | ||||||||||||
Cost $1,402,831) | ||||||||||||
Total Portfolio Value - 100.0% | $ | 62,001,229 | ||||||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified | ||||||||||||
Cost $39,790,309) | ||||||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 17,688 | ||||||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 62,018,917 |
*Non-income producing security.
8
OPPORTUNITY FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | |||||||||
Aerospace - Defense | |||||||||||
Newport News Shipbuilding | 24,000 | 660,000 | |||||||||
Total Aerospace - Defense - 1.1% | $ | 660,000 | |||||||||
Capital Goods | |||||||||||
Ball Corporation | 7,000 | 275,625 | |||||||||
Danaher Corporation | 10,000 | 482,500 | |||||||||
Total Capital Goods - 1.2% | $ | 758,125 | |||||||||
Chemicals | |||||||||||
Ecolab Inc. | 46,600 | 1,823,225 | |||||||||
Total Chemicals - 2.9% | $ | 1,823,225 | |||||||||
Computer Software | |||||||||||
BMC Software, Inc.* | 36,500 | 2,917,719 | |||||||||
Go.Com* | 9,200 | 219,075 | |||||||||
Network Associates* | 25,000 | 667,188 | |||||||||
Siebel Systems, Inc.* | 7,000 | 588,000 | |||||||||
Sterling Commerce, Inc.* | 27,555 | 938,592 | |||||||||
Sungard Data Systems, Inc.* | 28,000 | 665,000 | |||||||||
Total Computer Software - 9.6% | $ | 5,995,574 | |||||||||
Computer Peripheral | |||||||||||
EMC Corporation* | 33,000 | 3,605,250 | |||||||||
Lexmark Intl Group Inc.* | 22,000 | 1,991,000 | |||||||||
Total Computer Peripheral - 8.9% | $ | 5,596,250 | |||||||||
Electronic Equipment | |||||||||||
Molex Incorporated | 25,000 | 1,417,188 | |||||||||
Total Electronic Equipment - 2.3% | $ | 1,417,188 | |||||||||
Electronics - Semiconductors | |||||||||||
Altera Corporation* | 39,000 | 1,932,937 | |||||||||
Teradyne, Inc.* | 31,000 | 2,046,000 | |||||||||
Vitesse Semiconductor Corp.* | 42,000 | 2,202,375 | |||||||||
Total Electronics - Semiconductors - 9.8% | $ | 6,181,312 | |||||||||
Energy Services | |||||||||||
Devon Energy Corporation | 35,000 | 1,150,625 | |||||||||
Smith International, Inc.* | 33,000 | 1,639,688 | |||||||||
Total Energy Services - 4.4% | $ | 2,790,313 | |||||||||
Financial - Brokerage | |||||||||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. | 23,000 | 849,562 | |||||||||
Total Financial - Brokerage - 1.4% | $ | 849,562 | |||||||||
Financial - Insurance | |||||||||||
AON Corporation | 14,550 | 582,000 | |||||||||
Reliastar Financial Corporation | 35,200 | 1,379,400 | |||||||||
Total Financial - Insurance - 3.1% | $ | 1,961,400 | |||||||||
Financial - Regional Banks | |||||||||||
First Tennessee National Corp. | 47,000 | 1,339,500 | |||||||||
National Commerce Bancorp | 30,000 | 680,625 | |||||||||
North Fork Bancorp | 41,000 | 717,500 | |||||||||
Total Financial - Regional Banks - 4.4% | $ | 2,737,625 | |||||||||
Foods | |||||||||||
Tootsie Roll Industries | 17,858 | 588,198 | |||||||||
Total Foods - .9% | $ | 588,198 | |||||||||
Health Care - Drugs | |||||||||||
Elan Corporation PLC, ADR* | 23,500 | 693,250 | |||||||||
Forest Labs Inc. Class A* | 30,200 | 1,855,412 | |||||||||
Mylan Laboratories | 31,700 | 798,444 | |||||||||
Watson Pharmaceutical* | 23,000 | 823,687 | |||||||||
Total Health Care - Drugs - 6.6% | $ | 4,170,793 | |||||||||
Health Care - Products | |||||||||||
Biomet Inc. | 20,000 | 800,000 | |||||||||
Sybron International Corp. | 50,500 | 1,246,719 | |||||||||
Total Health Care - Products - 3.3% | $ | 2,046,719 |
* Non-income producing security.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements
9
OPPORTUNITY FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | ||||||||
Household Furniture | ||||||||||
Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. | 26,000 | 833,625 | ||||||||
Total Household | ||||||||||
Furniture - 1.3% | $ | 833,625 | ||||||||
Industrial Services | ||||||||||
Cintas Corporation | 12,200 | 648,125 | ||||||||
G & K Services, Inc., Class A | 41,700 | 1,350,038 | ||||||||
Total Industrial Services - | $ | 1,998,163 | ||||||||
3.2% | ||||||||||
Lodging - Hotel | ||||||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruise | 15,000 | 739,688 | ||||||||
Total Lodging - Hotel - 1.2% | $ | 739,688 | ||||||||
Manufacture - Diverse | ||||||||||
Johnson Controls, Inc. | 13,000 | 739,375 | ||||||||
Total Manufacture-Diverse - | $ | 739,375 | ||||||||
1.2% | ||||||||||
Natural Gas | ||||||||||
National Fuel Gas Company | 12,000 | 558,000 | ||||||||
Peoples Energy Corporation | 16,000 | 536,000 | ||||||||
Total Natural Gas - 1.7% | $ | 1,094,000 | ||||||||
Oil and Gas | ||||||||||
Weatherford International | 23,000 | 918,562 | ||||||||
Total Oil and Gas - 1.5% | $ | 918,562 | ||||||||
Retailing | ||||||||||
Abercrombie and Fitch* | 20,000 | 533,750 | ||||||||
BJs Wholesale Club Inc.* | 43,000 | 1,569,500 | ||||||||
Circuit City Stores | 16,000 | 721,000 | ||||||||
Dollar General Corporation | 45,750 | 1,040,812 | ||||||||
Gap, Inc. | 46,500 | 2,139,000 | ||||||||
Linens n Things, Inc.* | 19,000 | 562,875 | ||||||||
Tandy Corporation | 43,000 | 2,115,063 | ||||||||
Total Retailing - 13.8% | $ | 8,682,000 | ||||||||
Telecommunication Services | ||||||||||
ADC Telecommunications, Inc.* | 20,000 | 1,451,250 | ||||||||
Century Tele Enterprises, Inc. | 43,750 | 2,072,656 | ||||||||
Broadwing, Inc. | 50,000 | 1,843,750 | ||||||||
Metromedia Fiber Network* | 22,000 | 1,054,625 | ||||||||
Qwest Communications Intl* | 40,650 | 1,747,950 | ||||||||
Total Telecomm Services - 13.0% | $ | 8,170,231 | ||||||||
Total Common Stocks - 96.8% | $ | 60,751,928 | ||||||||
(Common Stock Identified Cost $40,492,749) | ||||||||||
Cash Equivalents | ||||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves Money Market Fund | 2,018,494 | |||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents - 3.2% | $ | 2,018,494 | ||||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified | ||||||||||
Cost $2,018,494) | ||||||||||
Total Portfolio Value - 100.0% | $ | 62,770,422 | ||||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $42,511,243) | ||||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 4,973 | ||||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 62,775,395 |
* Non-income producing security.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
10
REALTY FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Common Stocks (REITS) | Shares | Dollar Value | ||||||||||
Apartments | ||||||||||||
Apartment Investment and Management, Co. | 6,805 | 270,927 | ||||||||||
Archstone Communities Trust | 10,655 | 218,427 | ||||||||||
Avalon Bay Communities, Inc. | 7,592 | 260,501 | ||||||||||
BRE Properties, Inc. | 6,130 | 139,074 | ||||||||||
Camden Property Trust | 5,815 | 159,185 | ||||||||||
Equity Residential Properties Trust | 4,975 | 212,370 | ||||||||||
Essex Property Trust, Inc. | 6,570 | 223,380 | ||||||||||
Post Properties, Inc. | 5,055 | 193,354 | ||||||||||
Total Apartments - 28.8% | $ | 1,677,218 | ||||||||||
Diversified | ||||||||||||
Vorando Realty Trust | 7,500 | 243,750 | ||||||||||
Total Diversified - 4.2% | $ | 243,750 | ||||||||||
Lodging and Hotels | ||||||||||||
Flecor Lodging Trust | 6,100 | 106,750 | ||||||||||
Wyndham International | 29,650 | 87,097 | ||||||||||
Starwood Hotels and Resorts | 7,460 | 175,310 | ||||||||||
Total Lodging and Hotels - 6.3% | $ | 369,157 | ||||||||||
Office and Industrial | ||||||||||||
Boston Properties, Inc. | 7,175 | 223,322 | ||||||||||
Cali Realty Corporation | 6,795 | 177,095 | ||||||||||
Duke Realty Investments | 11,860 | 231,270 | ||||||||||
Equity Office Properties | 9,145 | 225,195 | ||||||||||
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 8,680 | 238,157 | ||||||||||
Highwoods Properties, Inc. | 8,150 | 189,487 | ||||||||||
Kilroy Realty Corporation | 6,345 | 139,590 | ||||||||||
Liberty Property Trust | 6,630 | 160,777 | ||||||||||
Prentiss Properties Trust | 8,350 | 175,350 | ||||||||||
Prologis Trust | 10,005 | 192,596 | ||||||||||
Spieker Properties, Inc. | 5,305 | 193,301 | ||||||||||
Total Office and Industrial - 36.9% | $ | 2,146,140 | ||||||||||
Retail | ||||||||||||
General Growth Properties | 7,635 | 213,780 | ||||||||||
JDN Realty Properties | 6,360 | 102,555 | ||||||||||
Kimco Realty Corporation | 6,735 | 228,148 | ||||||||||
Macerich Company | 4,830 | 100,524 | ||||||||||
Regency Realty Corporation | 6,940 | 138,800 | ||||||||||
Simon Properties Group, Inc. | 9,745 | 223,526 | ||||||||||
Weingarten Realty Investors | 2,955 | 115,060 | ||||||||||
Total Retail - 19.4% | $ | 1,122,393 | ||||||||||
Total Common Stocks - 95.6% | $ | 5,558,658 | ||||||||||
(Common Stock Identified Cost $6,764,092) | ||||||||||||
Cash Equivalents | ||||||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves | ||||||||||||
Money Market Fund | 255,114 | |||||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents - 4.4% | $ | 255,114 | ||||||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified | ||||||||||||
Cost $255,114) | ||||||||||||
Total Portfolio Value - 100.0% | $ | 5,813,772 | ||||||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $7,019,206) | ||||||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 45,565 | ||||||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 5,859,337 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
11
FIXED INCOME FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Fixed Income Securities - Bonds | Face | Dollar Value | ||||||||||||
Bank Bonds - Major Regional | ||||||||||||||
Banc One Corp., 9.875%, 3/1/09 | 250,000 | 287,500 | ||||||||||||
Comerica Bank Sub. Note, 6.875%, 3/1/08 | 250,000 | 236,875 | ||||||||||||
First Union Corp., 7.5%, 7/15/06 | 500,000 | 498,125 | ||||||||||||
Mellon Financial Co., 6.70%, 3/1/08 | 500,000 | 475,000 | ||||||||||||
NBD Bancorp, 7.125%, 5/15/07 | 400,000 | 387,000 | ||||||||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 6.875%, 7/15/07 | 500,000 | 476,250 | ||||||||||||
Provident Bank, 6.375%, 1/15/04 | 500,000 | 476,875 | ||||||||||||
Star Bank N.A., 6.625%, 12/15/06 | 475,000 | 449,469 | ||||||||||||
SunTrust Bank, 6.50%, 1/15/08 | 500,000 | 466,875 | ||||||||||||
Total Major Regional Banks - 12.6% | $ | 3,753,969 | ||||||||||||
Bank Bonds - Money Center | ||||||||||||||
Bankers Trust NY Corp., 7.15%, 8/14/12 | 400,000 | 395,000 | ||||||||||||
Total Money Center Banks - 1.3% | $ | 395,000 | ||||||||||||
Capital Equipment | ||||||||||||||
Dover Corp., 6.25%, 6/1/08 | 500,000 | 463,125 | ||||||||||||
Honeywell, Inc., 7.125%, 4/15/08 | 400,000 | 389,500 | ||||||||||||
IBM Corp., 6.45%, 8/1/07 | 300,000 | 286,500 | ||||||||||||
Total Capital Equipment - 3.8% | $ | 1,139,125 | ||||||||||||
Chemicals | ||||||||||||||
Hercules, Inc., 6.625%, 6/1/03 | 250,000 | 241,562 | ||||||||||||
Total Chemicals - 0.8% | $ | 241,562 | ||||||||||||
Food and Beverage | ||||||||||||||
Procter & Gamble Company Global Bond Issue, 6.60%, 12/15/04 | 250,000 | 246,250 | ||||||||||||
Sara Lee Corporation, Medium Term Note, 5.70%, 7/14/00 | 250,000 | 249,063 | ||||||||||||
Total Food and Beverage - 1.7% | $ | 495,313 | ||||||||||||
Electric Utilities | ||||||||||||||
Ameren Corp., 6.875%, 8/1/04 | 200,000 | 195,750 | ||||||||||||
Carolina Power & Light Co., 6.75%, 10/1/02 | 250,000 | 247,188 | ||||||||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 5.375%, 1/1/09 | 500,000 | 423,750 | ||||||||||||
Louisville Gas & Electric Co., 7.50%, 7/1/02 | 25,000 | 25,156 | ||||||||||||
Midwest Power Corp., 7.00%, 2/15/05 | 200,000 | 196,000 | ||||||||||||
National Rural Utilities, 5.70%, 1/15/10 | 500,000 | 435,000 | ||||||||||||
Virginia Electric Co., 6.375%, 3/1/04 | 500,000 | 507,500 | ||||||||||||
Total Electric Utilities - 6.8% | $ | 2,030,344 | ||||||||||||
Entertainment and Leisure | ||||||||||||||
Mattel Inc., 6.125%, 7/15/05 | 500,000 | 456,875 | ||||||||||||
Walt Disney Company, 5.80%, 10/27/08 | 400,000 | 358,500 | ||||||||||||
Total Entertainment and Leisure - 2.7% | $ | 815,375 | ||||||||||||
Financial - Services | ||||||||||||||
American General Finance, 8.125%, 8/15/09 | 120,000 | 123,300 | ||||||||||||
CIT Group Holdings, 8.375%, 11/1/01 | 250,000 | 255,625 | ||||||||||||
Ford Motor Credit Company, 6.70%, 7/16/04 | 500,000 | 490,000 | ||||||||||||
Household Finance Corp. | ||||||||||||||
Senior Note, 6.875%, 3/1/03 | 700,000 | 691,250 | ||||||||||||
Merry Land and Investment Co., 7.25%, 6/15/05 | 500,000 | 485,000 | ||||||||||||
Total Financial - Services - 6.9% | $ | 2,045,175 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Utilities (U.S. Dollar Denominated) | ||||||||||||||
Hydro Quebec Medium Term Note, 6.98%, 3/01/05 | 200,000 | 196,500 | ||||||||||||
Total Foreign Utilities (US $) - 0.7% | $ | 196,500 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
12
FIXED INCOME FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Fixed Income Securities - Bonds | Face | Dollar Value | |||||||||
Health Care | |||||||||||
McKesson Corp., 6.40%, 3/1/08 | 400,000 | 343,500 | |||||||||
Total Health Care - 1.2% | $ | 343,500 | |||||||||
Natural Gas Utilities | |||||||||||
Enron Corp., 6.75%, 8/01/09 | 600,000 | 558,750 | |||||||||
Total Natural Gas Utilities - 1.9% | $ | 558,750 | |||||||||
Petroleum | |||||||||||
Amoco Corp. Canada, 7.25%, 12/1/02 | 200,000 | 201,750 | |||||||||
Total Petroleum - .7% | $ | 201,750 | |||||||||
Publishing | |||||||||||
The Tribune Company, 6.875%, 11/1/06 | 500,000 | 480,000 | |||||||||
Total Publishing - 1.6% | $ | 480,000 | |||||||||
Railroads | |||||||||||
CSX Transportation Equipment Trust, 6.07%, 3/15/01 | 200,000 | 198,000 | |||||||||
Total Railroads - 0.7% | $ | 198,000 | |||||||||
Retailing | |||||||||||
Gap Inc., 6.90%, 9/15/07 | 500,000 | 484,375 | |||||||||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 6.375%, 3/1/03 | 200,000 | 196,500 | |||||||||
Total Retailing - 2.3% | $ | 680,875 | |||||||||
Services | |||||||||||
Hertz Corp., 6.25%, 3/15/09 | 500,000 | 455,625 | |||||||||
Service Corp. Intl, 6.50%, 3/15/08 | 500,000 | 370,625 | |||||||||
Total Services - 2.8% | $ | 826,250 | |||||||||
Telecommunications | |||||||||||
AT & T Corp., 6.00%, 3/15/09 | 500,000 | 454,375 | |||||||||
AT & T Corp., 6.75%, 4/1/04 | 500,000 | 491,875 | |||||||||
Lucent Technologies, 5.50%, 11/15/08 | 400,000 | 355,500 | |||||||||
GTE Corp., 7.51%, 4/1/09 | 600,000 | 599,250 | |||||||||
New York Telephone Co., 5.875%, 9/1/03 | 200,000 | 191,500 | |||||||||
Southwestern Bell Corp., 6.375%, 4/1/01 | 200,000 | 199,000 | |||||||||
Total Telecommunications - 7.7% | $ | 2,291,500 | |||||||||
United States Government Agency Obligations (A) | |||||||||||
FHLB, 6.10%, 12/13/10 | 750,000 | 693,567 | |||||||||
FHLB, 7.03%, 5/6/11 | 250,000 | 247,472 | |||||||||
FHLMC, 6.005%, 12/8/05 | 200,000 | 191,121 | |||||||||
FHLMC, 5.95%, 1/19/06 | 400,000 | 380,529 | |||||||||
FHLMC, 5.125%, 10/15/08 | 500,000 | 438,604 | |||||||||
FNMA, 7.50%, 2/11/02 | 200,000 | 203,613 | |||||||||
FNMA, 7.55%, 4/22/02 | 200,000 | 204,045 | |||||||||
FNMA, 5.75%, 4/15/03 | 1,000,000 | 971,724 | |||||||||
FNMA, 5.125%, 2/13/04 | 500,000 | 470,190 | |||||||||
FNMA, 7.80%, 3/29/05 | 200,000 | 200,155 | |||||||||
FNMA, 5.75%, 6/15/05 | 1,000,000 | 951,054 | |||||||||
FNMA, 5.75%, 2/15/08 | 1,000,000 | 922,917 | |||||||||
FNMA, 5.25%, 1/15/09 | 1,350,000 | 1,190,437 | |||||||||
GNMA, 7.00%, 12/15/25 | 269,901 | 260,792 | |||||||||
GNMA, 7.50%, 8/15/26 | 202,278 | 200,130 | |||||||||
Total United States Government | |||||||||||
Agency Obligations - 25.2% | $ | 7,526,350 | |||||||||
United States Government Agency Obligations - | |||||||||||
Mortgage Backed Securities (A) | |||||||||||
FHLMC, CMO Series 1639-PD, 5.60%, 8/15/06 | 106,025 | 105,541 | |||||||||
FHLMC, CMO Series 1660-G, 6.25%, 7/15/07 | 250,000 | 246,969 | |||||||||
FHLMC, 15 Year Gold, 7.00%, 3/01/11 | 197,390 | 195,231 | |||||||||
FNMA Dus Pool Series 73894, 6.525%, 12/1/03 | 485,016 | 473,497 | |||||||||
Total Government Agency Obligations - | |||||||||||
Mortgage Backed Securities - 3.3% | $ | 1,021,238 |
(A) See abbreviations on next page.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
13
FIXED INCOME FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Fixed Income Securities - Bonds | Face | Dollar Value | |||||||||
United States Government Obligations | |||||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 7.875%, 8/15/01 | 400,000 | 409,869 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 7.50%, 11/15/01 | 200,000 | 204,316 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 7.875%, 11/15/04 | 500,000 | 528,550 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.50%, 8/15/05 | 500,000 | 499,871 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.875%, 5/15/06 | 500,000 | 508,499 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 7.00%, 7/15/06 | 500,000 | 512,004 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.25%, 2/15/07 | 500,000 | 492,050 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.625%, 5/15/07 | 500,000 | 501,796 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 5.50%, 2/15/08 | 400,000 | 374,553 | |||||||||
Total United States Government | |||||||||||
Obligations - 13.4% | $ | 4,031,508 | |||||||||
Total Fixed Income Bonds - 98.1% | $ | 29,272,084 | |||||||||
(Fixed Income Identified Cost $30,720,206) | |||||||||||
Cash Equivalents | |||||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves Money Market Fund |
564,783 | ||||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents - 1.9% | $ | 564,783 | |||||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified Cost $564,783) | |||||||||||
Total Portfolio Value - 100.0% | $ | 29,836,867 | |||||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $31,284,990) | |||||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 534,255 | |||||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 30,371,122 |
(A)
Abbreviations: | ||
FHLB - FHLMC - FNMA - GNMA - |
Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal National Mortgage Association Government National Mortgage Association |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
14
MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Municipal Income Securities - Bonds | Face | Dollar Value | |||||||||
General Obligation - City | |||||||||||
Akron, OH, 5.00%, 12/1/05 | 100,000 | 100,276 | |||||||||
Cleveland, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 4.9%, 9/1/02 | 50,000 | 50,430 | |||||||||
Columbus, OH, Tax Increment Financing, (AMBAC Insured), 4.9%, 12/1/11 | 150,000 | 142,271 | |||||||||
Columbus, OH, 12.375%, 2/15/07 | 25,000 | 35,830 | |||||||||
Columbus, OH, Series 2, 5.00%, 6/15/10 | 100,000 | 97,960 | |||||||||
Loveland, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 4.9%, 12/1/08 | 100,000 | 97,823 | |||||||||
Vandalia, OH, 4.80%, 12/1/03 | 75,000 | 75,103 | |||||||||
Warder Library, OH, 6.25%, 12/1/03 | 135,000 | 141,839 | |||||||||
Westlake, OH, 4.90%, 12/1/04 | 50,000 | 50,325 | |||||||||
Youngstown, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.10%, 12/1/11 | 100,000 | 97,517 | |||||||||
Total General Obligation - City - 17.4% | $ | 889,374 | |||||||||
General Obligation - County | |||||||||||
Belmont County, OH (MBIA Insured), 4.50%, 12/1/11 | 155,000 | 143,694 | |||||||||
Belmont County, OH (MBIA Insured), 5.10%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 50,545 | |||||||||
Delaware County, OH, 5.25%, 12/1/06 | 50,000 | 50,687 | |||||||||
Hocking County, OH, 4.90%, 12/1/06 | 50,000 | 48,398 | |||||||||
Knox County, OH, 4.75%, 12/1/09 | 60,000 | 57,404 | |||||||||
Montgomery County, OH, 5.30%, 12/1/00 | 75,000 | 75,822 | |||||||||
Portage County, OH, (MBIA Insured), 5.15%, 12/1/07 | 75,000 | 75,435 | |||||||||
Trumbull County, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.25%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 50,926 | |||||||||
Washington Township, OH, 4.65%, 12/1/05 | 75,000 | 72,385 | |||||||||
Total General Obligation - County - 12.2% | $ | 625,296 | |||||||||
Higher Education | |||||||||||
Ohio State Higher Education Facilities, Denison University, 4.90%, 11/1/05 | 75,000 | 74,377 | |||||||||
University of Cincinnati, OH General Receipts, 4.75%, 6/1/06 | 50,000 | 49,446 | |||||||||
University of Toledo, OH (Prerefunded), 5.9%, 6/1/20 | 105,000 | 110,449 | |||||||||
Total Higher Education - 4.6% | $ | 234,272 | |||||||||
Hospital/Health | |||||||||||
Hamilton County, OH, Hospital Childrens Hospital Medical Center, (MBIA Insured), 5.25%, 5/15/10 | 100,000 | 99,473 | |||||||||
Episcopal Retirement Homes, Ohio Hospital Facility Revenue, 5.00%, 1/1/15 | 100,000 | 99,868 | |||||||||
Franklin County, OH, The Childrens Hospital Project, 5.20%, 11/1/04 | 50,000 | 50,209 | |||||||||
Hamilton County, OH, Hospital Facility Revenue, Childrens Hospital, (FGIC Insured), 5.00%, 5/15/06 | 50,000 | 50,123 | |||||||||
Hamilton County, OH, Twin Towers Health Care Facility, 5.25%, 10/1/09 | 100,000 | 95,602 | |||||||||
Lorain County, OH, Hospital Facility Revenue, Catholic Healthcare Partners, (MBIA Insured), 6.00%, 9/1/07 | 50,000 | 52,984 | |||||||||
Lorain County, OH, Revenue Bond, Catholic Healthcare Partners Project (AMBAC Insured), 5.20%, 09/1/10 | 100,000 | 99,061 | |||||||||
Warren, OH, Hospital Revenue (Prerefunded), 7.3%, 11/15/14 | 150,000 | 166,008 | |||||||||
Total Hospital/Health - 14.0% | $ | 713,328 | |||||||||
Revenue Bonds - Transportation | |||||||||||
Butler County, OH, Transportation Improvement, (FSA Insured), 5.50%, 4/1/09 | 100,000 | 102,414 | |||||||||
Ohio State Turnpike Revenue, (Prerefunded), 5.75%, 2/15/24 | 125,000 | 131,481 | |||||||||
Total Revenue Bond - Transportation - 4.6% | $ | 233,895 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
15
MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of December 31, 1999 |
Municipal Income Securities - Bonds | Face | Dollar Value | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue Bonds - Electric | |||||||||||||||||||
Weatherford, TX Utility System Revenue, (MBIA Insured), 5.10%, 9/1/03 | 50,000 | 50,611 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Revenue Bonds - Electric - 1.0% | $ | 50,611 | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue Bonds - Water and Sewer | |||||||||||||||||||
Akron, OH, Sewer System, (MBIA Insured), 5.50% 12/1/07 | 50,000 | 51,617 | |||||||||||||||||
Butler, OH, Waterworks System, (FSA Insured), 4.40% 12/1/10 | 100,000 | 91,323 | |||||||||||||||||
Cleveland, OH, Waterworks First Mortgage, Series G | |||||||||||||||||||
(MBIA Insured), 5.25%, 1/1/04 | 50,000 | 50,862 | |||||||||||||||||
Cleveland, OH, Waterworks Revenue, Series I (FSA Insured), 5.25%, 1/1/10 | 100,000 | 99,874 | |||||||||||||||||
Columbus, OH, Water and Sewer, 5.00%, 11/01/06 | 100,000 | 99,925 | |||||||||||||||||
Lorain, OH, Water System, (AMBAC Insured), 4.75%, 4/1/04 | 50,000 | 50,087 | |||||||||||||||||
Miamisburg, OH, Sewer System, (AMBAC Insured), 4.35%, 11/15/02 | 50,000 | 49,706 | |||||||||||||||||
Montgomery County, OH, Solid Waste, (MBIA Insured), 5.125%, 11/1/08 | 50,000 | 49,916 | |||||||||||||||||
Southwest OH, Regl Water District Water- works, (MBIA Insured), 5.25%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 51,054 | |||||||||||||||||
Warren County, Ohio Water and Sewer Line Extension, Special Assessment Bonds, 5.50%, 12/1/03 | 50,000 | 51,356 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Revenue Bond - Water & Sewer - 12.6% | $ | 645,720 | |||||||||||||||||
School District | |||||||||||||||||||
Centerburg, OH, 5.25%, 10/15/01 | 40,000 | 40,260 | |||||||||||||||||
Forest Hills, OH, 4.90%, 12/1/04 | 100,000 | 99,957 | |||||||||||||||||
Gallia County, OH, 5.00%, 3/1/03 | 25,000 | 24,883 | |||||||||||||||||
Gallia County, OH, 5.00%, 3/1/04 | 25,000 | 24,755 | |||||||||||||||||
Indian Valley, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.50%, 12/1/06 | 50,000 | 51,498 | |||||||||||||||||
Northwestern, OH, 4.65%, 12/1/06 | 105,000 | 100,142 | |||||||||||||||||
Loveland, OH, School General Obligation, 4.40%, 12/1/08 | 100,000 | 93,818 | |||||||||||||||||
Southwestern City, OH, 6.25%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 52,659 | |||||||||||||||||
Sycamore, OH, Community School District (AMBAC Insured), 4.6%, 12/1/11 | 100,000 | 91,837 | |||||||||||||||||
West Geauga, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.45%, 11/1/04 | 50,000 | 51,557 | |||||||||||||||||
Westlake, OH, 4.85%, 12/1/03 | 100,000 | 100,313 | |||||||||||||||||
Total School District - 14.3% | $ | 731,679 | |||||||||||||||||
State Agency - Building Authority | |||||||||||||||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Administration Building Fund, 6.40%, 10/1/01 | 50,000 | 51,593 | |||||||||||||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Adult Correctional-Series A, 5.50%, 10/01/10 | 100,000 | 101,488 | |||||||||||||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Juvenile Correction Facilities, 4.375%, 10/1/12 | 100,000 | 88,148 | |||||||||||||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Ohio Center For The Arts, 5.45%, 10/1/07 | 100,000 | 102,274 | |||||||||||||||||
Total State Agency - Building Authority - 6.7% | $ | 343,503 | |||||||||||||||||
State Agency - Education | |||||||||||||||||||
Ohio State Elementary and Secondary Education, (FSA Insured), 5.0%, 12/1/07 | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Ohio State Higher Education Facilities, 5.90%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 51,725 | |||||||||||||||||
Ohio State Public Facilities Commission, (MBIA Insured), 4.70%, 06/1/11 | 100,000 | 93,319 | |||||||||||||||||
Total State Agency - Education - 4.9% | $ | 245,044 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Income - Municipal Bonds - 92.3% | $ | 4,712,722 | |||||||||||||||||
(Municipal Bonds Identified Cost $4,808,036) | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash Equivalents | |||||||||||||||||||
Federated Ohio Municipal Cash Trust | 395,424 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents - 7.7% | $ | 395,424 | |||||||||||||||||
(Cash Identified Cost $395,424) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Portfolio Value - 100.0% | $ | 5,108,146 | |||||||||||||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $5,203,460) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 39,378 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 5,147,524 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
16
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | December 31, 1999 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Stock Funds | Bond Funds | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed | Municipal | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Growth | Opportunity | Realty | Income | Income | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
at Market Value* | $ | 62,001,229 | $ | 62,770,422 | $ | 5,813,772 | $ | 29,836,867 | $ | 5,108,146 | |||||||||||||
Dividends and Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable | $ | 61,572 | $ | 53,089 | $ | 50,148 | $ | 556,026 | $ | 42,113 | |||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 62,062,801 | $ | 62,823,511 | $ | 5,863,920 | $ | 30,392,893 | $ | 5,150,259 | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued Management Fees | $ | 43,884 | $ | 48,116 | $ | 4,583 | $ | 21,771 | $ | 2,735 | |||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 43,884 | $ | 48,116 | $ | 4,583 | $ | 21,771 | $ | 2,735 | |||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 62,018,917 | $ | 62,775,395 | $ | 5,859,337 | $ | 30,371,122 | $ | 5,147,524 | |||||||||||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid in Capital (see footnote #9) | $ | 39,807,995 | $ | 42,516,215 | $ | 7,396,754 | $ | 31,819,243 | $ | 5,242,837 | |||||||||||||
Undistributed Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 7 | $ | 0 | $ | 1 | |||||||||||||
Undistributed Net Realized Gain | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) from Security Transactions | $ | 2 | $ | 1 | ($331,991 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
on Investments | $ | 22,210,920 | $ | 20,259,179 | ($1,205,433 | ) | ($1,448,123 | ) | ($95,314 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 62,018,917 | $ | 62,775,395 | $ | 5,859,337 | $ | 30,371,122 | $ | 5,147,524 | |||||||||||||
Shares Outstanding | 1,831,430 | 1,879,436 | 546,799 | 2,034,540 | 339,170 | ||||||||||||||||||
Offering, Redemption and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Per Share | $ | 33.86 | $ | 33.40 | $ | 10.72 | $ | 14.93 | $ | 15.18 | |||||||||||||
*Identified Cost of Securities | $ | 39,790,309 | $ | 42,511,243 | $ | 7,019,206 | $ | 31,284,990 | $ | 5,203,460 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
17
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | December 31, 1999 |
Statement of Operations
Stock Funds | Bond Funds | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed | Municipal | |||||||||||||||||||||
Growth | Opportunity | Realty | Income | Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||
12/31/99 | 12/31/99 | 12/31/99 | 12/31/99 | 12/31/99 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 101,546 | $ | 126,738 | $ | 10,074 | $ | 1,729,482 | $ | 207,538 | ||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 443,355 | $ | 328,142 | $ | 317,726 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total Investment Income | $ | 544,901 | $ | 454,880 | $ | 327,800 | $ | 1,729,482 | $ | 207,538 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Management Fee | $ | 531,275 | $ | 525,654 | $ | 55,854 | $ | 275,182 | $ | 44,217 | ||||||||||||
Management Fee Waiver | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(See accompanying note #3) | ($26,564 | ) | ($26,283 | ) | ($2,793 | ) | ($41,277 | ) | ($15,476 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Expenses | $ | 504,711 | $ | 499,371 | $ | 53,061 | $ | 233,905 | $ | 28,741 | ||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 40,190 | ($44,491 | ) | $ | 274,739 | $ | 1,495,577 | $ | 178,797 | ||||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses): | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Transactions | $ | 1,071,337 | $ | 2,888,171 | ($232,203 | ) | $ | 39,278 | $ | 3,253 | ||||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
on Investments | $ | 5,126,367 | $ | 4,152,996 | ($184,150 | ) | ($2,522,908 | ) | ($239,989 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Gain (Loss) on Investments | $ | 6,197,704 | $ | 7,041,167 | ($416,353 | ) | ($2,483,630 | ) | ($236,736 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
from Operations | $ | 6,237,894 | $ | 6,996,676 | ($141,614 | ) | ($988,053 | ) | ($57,939 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
18
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | December 31, 1999 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Stock Funds | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Growth Fund | Opportunity Fund | Realty Fund | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | 12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | 12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 40,190 | $ | 72,796 | ($44,491 | ) | ($24,884 | ) | $ | 274,739 | $ | 214,770 | |||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
from Security Transactions | $ | 1,071,337 | $ | 2,512,476 | $ | 2,888,171 | $ | 512,708 | ($232,203 | ) | ($99,788 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
on Investments | $ | 5,126,367 | $ | 7,713,290 | $ | 4,152,996 | $ | 6,762,552 | ($184,150 | ) | ($1,021,284 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets from Operations | $ | 6,237,894 | $ | 10,298,562 | $ | 6,996,676 | $ | 7,250,376 | ($141,614 | ) | ($906,302 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | ($40,539 | ) | ($72,905 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ($274,737 | ) | ($214,765 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain from | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Transactions | ($1,071,330 | ) | ($2,512,484 | ) | ($2,888,176 | ) | ($512,704 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Net Return of Capital | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ($51,078 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net (Decrease) in Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
from Distributions | ($1,111,869 | ) | ($2,585,389 | ) | ($2,888,176 | ) | ($512,704 | ) | ($274,737 | ) | ($265,843 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Capital Share Transactions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds From Sale of Shares | $ | 12,285,288 | $ | 10,741,691 | $ | 11,278,789 | $ | 8,705,583 | $ | 1,654,737 | $ | 6,402,027 | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value of Shares Issued on | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of Distributions | $ | 1,006,436 | $ | 2,320,223 | $ | 2,801,257 | $ | 499,470 | $ | 51,211 | $ | 92,315 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of Shares Redeemed | ($4,786,653 | ) | ($4,288,044 | ) | ($3,625,807 | ) | ($2,786,372 | ) | ($487,761 | ) | ($264,696 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Increase in Assets from | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Share Transactions | $ | 8,505,071 | $ | 8,773,870 | $ | 10,454,239 | $ | 6,418,681 | $ | 1,218,187 | $ | 6,229,646 | |||||||||||||||
Net Change in Net Assets | $ | 13,631,096 | $ | 16,487,043 | $ | 14,562,739 | $ | 13,156,353 | $ | 801,836 | $ | 5,057,501 | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at Beginning of Period | $ | 48,387,821 | $ | 31,900,778 | $ | 48,212,656 | $ | 35,056,303 | $ | 5,057,501 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at End of Period | $ | 62,018,917 | $ | 48,387,821 | $ | 62,775,395 | $ | 48,212,656 | $ | 5,859,337 | $ | 5,057,501 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
19
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | December 31,1999 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Bond Funds | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | Municipal Income Fund | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | 12/31/99 | 12/31/98 | |||||||||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 1,495,577 | $ | 1,117,134 | $ | 178,797 | $ | 152,992 | ||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||
from Security Transactions | $ | 39,278 | $ | 56,950 | $ | 3,253 | $ | 15,965 | ||||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||
on Investments | ($2,522,908 | ) | $ | 608,285 | ($239,989 | ) | $ | 22,910 | ||||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets from Operations | ($988,053 | ) | $ | 1,782,369 | ($57,939 | ) | $ | 191,867 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | ($1,495,596 | ) | ($1,117,058 | ) | ($178,804 | ) | ($152,953 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain from | ||||||||||||||||||||
Security Transactions | ($39,265 | ) | ($39,907 | ) | ($3,254 | ) | ($15,964 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net (Decrease) in Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
from Distributions | ($1,534,861 | ) | ($1,156,965 | ) | ($182,058 | ) | ($168,917 | ) | ||||||||||||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds From Sale of Shares | $ | 12,474,498 | $ | 8,764,787 | $ | 2,148,289 | $ | 2,219,947 | ||||||||||||
Net Asset Value of Shares Issued on | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of Dividends/Gains | $ | 886,212 | $ | 739,042 | $ | 44,667 | $ | 52,780 | ||||||||||||
Cost of Shares Redeemed | ($4,457,580 | ) | ($5,013,211 | ) | ($735,309 | ) | ($2,272,306 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Increase in Assets from | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Share Transactions | $ | 8,903,130 | $ | 4,490,618 | $ | 1,457,647 | $ | 421 | ||||||||||||
Net Change in Net Assets | $ | 6,380,216 | $ | 5,116,022 | $ | 1,217,650 | $ | 23,371 | ||||||||||||
Net Assets at Beginning of Period | $ | 23,990,906 | $ | 18,874,884 | $ | 3,929,874 | $ | 3,906,503 | ||||||||||||
Net Assets at End of Period | $ | 30,371,122 | $ | 23,990,906 | $ | 5,147,524 | $ | 3,929,874 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
20
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | GROWTH FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Growth Fund:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of Period | $ | 30.98 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 21.16 | $ | 18.86 | $ | 14.82 | |||||||||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.24 | |||||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Realized & Unrealized) | $ | 3.48 | $ | 7.32 | $ | 7.01 | $ | 2.98 | $ | 4.41 | |||||||||||||
Total Operations | $ | 3.50 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 7.17 | $ | 3.17 | $ | 4.65 | |||||||||||||
Distributions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income | ($0.02 | ) | ($0.05 | ) | ($0.16 | ) | ($0.19 | ) | ($0.24 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions from Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized Capital Gains | ($0.60 | ) | ($1.72 | ) | ($2.79 | ) | ($0.68 | ) | ($0.37 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Distributions | ($0.62 | ) | ($1.77 | ) | ($2.95 | ) | ($0.87 | ) | ($0.61 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period | $ | 33.86 | $ | 30.98 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 21.16 | $ | 18.86 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | 11.31 | % | 29.10 | % | 33.96 | % | 16.85 | % | 31.61 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | $ | 62.02 | $ | 48.39 | $ | 31.90 | $ | 21.42 | $ | 14.87 | |||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.07 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.99 | % | 1.42 | % | |||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 29.84 | % | 39.71 | % | 54.44 | % | 26.78 | % | 52.91 | % |
(1) The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Growth Fund from 1.30% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.95%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 12/31/99, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Growth Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 0.03% .
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
21
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | OPPORTUNITY FUND |
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout the period for the Opportunity Fund:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of Period | $ | 31.10 | $ | 26.44 | $ | 22.65 | $ | 19.42 | $ | 15.70 | ||||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | ($0.02 | ) | ($0.02 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Realized & Unrealized) | $ | 3.94 | $ | 5.02 | $ | 6.13 | $ | 4.43 | $ | 3.89 | ||||||||||||
Total Operations | $ | 3.92 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 6.16 | $ | 4.49 | $ | 3.97 | ||||||||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ($0.03 | ) | ($0.06 | ) | ($0.08 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions from Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized Capital Gains | ($1.62 | ) | ($0.34 | ) | ($2.34 | ) | ($1.20 | ) | ($0.17 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Distributions | ($1.62 | ) | ($0.34 | ) | ($2.37 | ) | ($1.26 | ) | ($0.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period | $ | 33.40 | $ | 31.10 | $ | 26.44 | $ | 22.65 | $ | 19.42 | ||||||||||||
Total Return | 12.65 | % | 18.93 | % | 27.26 | % | 23.10 | % | 25.27 | % | ||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | $ | 62.78 | $ | 48.21 | $ | 35.06 | $ | 22.09 | $ | 15.19 | ||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.08 | %) | (0.06 | %) | 0.11 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.59 | % | ||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 40.71 | % | 41.46 | % | 55.05 | % | 46.43 | % | 62.15 | % |
(1) The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Opportunity Fund from 1.30% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.95%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 12/31/99, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Opportunity Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: (0.13%).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
22
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | REALTY FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Realty Fund:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||
1999 | 1998 | |||||||||
Net Asset Value | ||||||||||
Beginning of Period | $ | 11.54 | $ | 15.00 | ||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||
Net Return of Capital | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities (Realized and Unrealized) | ($0.93 | ) | ($3.46 | ) | ||||||
Total Operations | ($0.28 | ) | ($2.73 | ) | ||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | ($0.54 | ) | ($0.61 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from Return of Capital | $ | 0.00 | ($0.12 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from Net realized Capital Gains | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||
Total Distributions | ($0.54 | ) | ($0.73 | ) | ||||||
Net Asset Value | ||||||||||
End of Period | $ | 10.72 | $ | 11.54 | ||||||
Total Return | (2.47 | %) | (18.56 | %) | ||||||
Net Assets, End of Period | ||||||||||
(Millions) | $ | 5.86 | $ | 5.10 | ||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | ||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to | ||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.95 | % | 0.48 | % | ||||||
Ratio of Net Income to | ||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 4.93 | % | 5.17 | % | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 11.21 | % | 12.07 | % |
(1) The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Realty Fund from 1.30% to 1.00%. The Adviser waived the management fee in entirety for the period 1/1/98 6/30/98. The Adviser waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.95% for the period 7/1/98 12/31/98, and through 1999. The Adviser intends the final fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 12/31/99, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Realty Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 4.88%.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
23
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | FIXED INCOME FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Fixed Income Fund:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Beginning of Period | $ | 16.36 | $ | 15.84 | $ | 15.45 | $ | 15.84 | $ | 14.20 | |||||||||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.83 | |||||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Realized & Unrealized) | ($1.41 | ) | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.39 | ($0.39 | ) | $ | 1.64 | |||||||||||||
Total Operations | ($0.60 | ) | $ | 1.41 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 2.47 | |||||||||||||
Distributions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income | ($0.81 | ) | ($0.86 | ) | ($0.88 | ) | ($0.86 | ) | ($0.83 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions from Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized Capital Gains | ($0.02 | ) | ($0.03 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
Total Distributions | ($0.83 | ) | ($0.89 | ) | ($0.88 | ) | ($0.86 | ) | ($0.83 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period | $ | 14.93 | $ | 16.36 | $ | 15.84 | $ | 15.45 | $ | 15.84 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | (3.68 | %) | 9.05 | % | 8.44 | % | 3.11 | % | 17.70 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | $ | 30.37 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 18.87 | $ | 16.14 | $ | 15.97 | |||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | |||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 5.45 | % | 5.40 | % | 5.67 | % | 5.56 | % | 5.54 | % | |||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13.66 | % | 24.89 | % | 29.33 | % | 14.04 | % | 4.95 | % |
(1) The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Fixed Income Fund from 1.15% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.85%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 12/31/99, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Fixed Income Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 5.30%.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
24
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | MUNICIPAL INCOME |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Municipal Income Fund:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of Period | $ | 15.99 | $ | 15.88 | $ | 15.57 | $ | 15.68 | $ | 14.73 | ||||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.63 | ||||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Realized & Unrealized) | ($0.80 | ) | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.32 | ($0.11 | ) | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||||||
Total Operations | ($0.20 | ) | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income (1) | ($0.60 | ) | ($0.64 | ) | ($0.64 | ) | ($0.63 | ) | ($0.63 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions from Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized Capital Gains | ($0.01 | ) | ($0.07 | ) | ($0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | ($0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Distributions | ($0.61 | ) | ($0.71 | ) | ($0.65 | ) | ($0.63 | ) | ($0.64 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period | $ | 15.18 | $ | 15.99 | $ | 15.88 | $ | 15.57 | $ | 15.68 | ||||||||||||
Total Return | (1.24 | %) | 5.19 | % | 6.23 | % | 3.43 | % | 10.88 | % | ||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | $ | 5.15 | $ | 3.93 | $ | 3.90 | $ | 2.81 | $ | 2.28 | ||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.65 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.68 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Net Assets (1) | 4.03 | % | 4.01 | % | 4.19 | % | 4.18 | % | 4.28 | % | ||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8.44 | % | 20.70 | % | 9.95 | % | 6.25 | % | 7.81 | % |
(1) All distributions are Federally tax exempt.
(2) The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Municipal Income Fund from 1.15% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.65%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 12/31/99, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Municipal income Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 3.68%.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
25
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1) Organization:
The Growth Fund, Fixed Income Fund, Opportunity Fund, Municipal Income Fund, and the Realty Fund are each series of the Johnson Mutual Funds Trust, and are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as no-load, open-end investment companies. The Johnson Mutual Funds Trust was established as an Ohio business trust under Declaration of Trust dated September 30, 1992. The Growth and Fixed Income Funds began offering their shares publicly on January 4, 1993. The Opportunity and Municipal Income Funds began offering their shares publicly on May 16, 1994. The Realty Fund began offering its shares publicly on January 2, 1998.
The investment objective of the Growth Fund is long term capital growth. The investment objective of the Opportunity Fund is long term capital growth. The investment objective of the Fixed Income Fund is a high level of income over the long term consistent with preservation of capital. The investment objective of the Municipal Income Fund is a high level of federally tax-free income over the long term consistent with preservation of capital. The investment objective of the Realty Fund is above average income and long term capital growth. The Realty Fund invest primarily in real estate related equity securities.
2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Security Valuation and Transactions:
The investments in securities are carried at market value. The market quotation used for common stocks which are traded on any exchange or on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market are valued at the last quoted sale price of the day, determined as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. In absence of a sale price, a security is valued at its last bid price except when, in the Advisers opinion, the last bid price does not accurately reflect the current value of the security.
Fixed income securities are valued by using independent pricing services which use prices provided by market makers or estimates of market values obtained from yield data relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics. When prices are not readily available from a pricing service, or when illiquid securities are being valued, securities are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Adviser, subject to review of the Board of Trustees. Short-term investments in fixed income securities with maturities of less than 60 days are valued by using the amortized cost method of valuation. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade date basis. Discounts and premiums on securities purchased are amortized over the life of the respective securities.
Investment Income and Realized Capital Gains and Losses on Investment Securities:
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Dividend and interest income are recorded net of foreign taxes. Gains and losses on sales of investments are calculated using the specific identification method.
Income Taxes:
It is the Funds policy to distribute annually, prior to the end of the calendar year, dividends sufficient to satisfy excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Service. This Internal Revenue Service requirement may cause an excess of distributions over the book year-end accumulated income. In addition, it is the Funds policy to distribute annually, after the end of the calendar year, any remaining net investment income and net realized capital gains to comply with the special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code available to registered investment companies. Accordingly, no tax provision is required.
3) Investment Advisory Agreement:
The investment advisory agreement provides that Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc. (the Adviser) will pay all of the Funds operating expenses, excluding brokerage fees and commissions, taxes, interest and extraordinary expenses. The Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund and Realty Fund paid the Adviser a management fee at the annual rate of 0.95% of each Funds average daily net assets, which was accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fixed Income Fund paid the Adviser a management fee at the annual rate of 0.85% of the Funds average daily net assets, and the Municipal Income Fund paid the Adviser a management fee at the annual rate of 0.65% of the Funds average daily net assets, both of which are accrued daily and paid monthly.
26
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3) Investment Advisory Agreement, continued:
The Adviser received management fees for the period January 1 - December 31, 1999 as indicated below. These fees are after the Adviser waived part of the management fees on each of the funds from the maximum of 1.00% to the effective fee ratios listed below. The Adviser intends the fee waivers to be permanent, although the Adviser has the right to remove these fee waivers any time after April 30, 2003.
Fee | Effective | Fee | Management | |||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fee | Waiver | Fee Ratio | Waiver | Fee | |||||||||||||||
Growth Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.95 | % | ($26,564 | ) | $ | 504,711 | ||||||||||
Opportunity Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.95 | % | ($26,283 | ) | $ | 499,371 | ||||||||||
Realty Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.95 | % | ($2,793 | ) | $ | 53,061 | ||||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.85 | % | ($41,277 | ) | $ | 233,905 | ||||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.65 | % | ($15,476 | ) | $ | 28,741 |
4) Related Party Transactions:
All officers and one trustee of the Johnson Mutual Funds Trust are employees of Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc., the Adviser. There are three independent Trustees. Each of the three independent Trustees received compensation during the 12 months ending December 31, 1999 of $4,000 for his responsibilities as trustee and has received no additional compensation from the Trust. Total Compensation for the Trustees, as a group was $12,000 for the period and as a group they received no additional compensation from the Trust.
The Adviser is not a registered broker-dealer of securities and thus does not receive commissions on trades made on behalf of the Funds. The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a Fund creates a presumption of control of the Fund, under Section 2(a)(9) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. As of December 31, 1999, Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc. and entities which the Adviser could be deemed to control or have discretion over owned in aggregate more than 25% of the Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Realty Fund, Fixed Income Fund, and the Municipal Income Fund.
Johnson Financial, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc., the Adviser. Johnson Financial, Inc. provides transfer agency, fund accounting, and administration services to the Funds. These services are paid for by the Adviser.
5) Purchases and Sales of Securities:
During the 12 months ended December 31, 1999, purchases and sales of investment securities aggregated:
Investment Securities Other | ||||||||||||||||
Than Short Term Investments and | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | U.S. Government Obligations | |||||||||||||||
Fund | Purchases | Sales | Purchases | Sales | ||||||||||||
Growth Fund | $ | 23,488,451 | $ | 16,053,042 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Opportunity Fund | $ | 28,385,293 | $ | 21,453,003 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Realty Fund | $ | 1,836,871 | $ | 624,162 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | $ | 9,827,883 | $ | 2,989,763 | $ | 2,339,347 | $ | 701,760 | ||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | $ | 1,519,291 | $ | 370,673 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
6) Capital Share Transactions:
As of December 31, 1999, there were an unlimited number of capital shares of no par value authorized. Each Fund records purchases of its capital shares at the daily net asset value next determined after receipt of a shareholders check or wire and application in proper form. Redemptions are recorded at the net asset value next determined following receipt of a shareholders written or telephone request in proper form.
27
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Capital Share Transactions for the Period January 1 - December 31, 1999:
Growth | Opportunity | Realty | Fixed | Municipal | ||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Income Fund | Income Fund | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Sold to Investors | 392,222 | 360,547 | 148,037 | 796,474 | 137,099 | |||||||||||||||
Shares Issued on Reinvestment Dividends | 29,770 | 84,656 | 4,698 | 57,863 | 2,896 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 421,992 | 445,203 | 152,735 | 854,337 | 139,995 | |||||||||||||||
Shares Redeemed | (152,458 | ) | (115,880 | ) | (44,232 | ) | (286,678 | ) | (46,649 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Increase/Decrease During Period | 269,534 | 329,323 | 108,503 | 567,659 | 93,346 | |||||||||||||||
Shares Outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 1998 (Beginning of Period) | 1,561,896 | 1,550,113 | 438,296 | 1,466,881 | 245,824 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 1999 (End of Period) | 1,831,430 | 1,879,436 | 546,799 | 2,034,540 | 339,170 |
7) Security Transactions:
For Federal income tax purposes, the cost of investments owned on December 31, 1999 was the same as identified cost. As of December 31, 1999 the composition of unrealized appreciation (the excess of value over tax cost) and depreciation (the excess of tax cost over value) was as follows:
Net | ||||||||||||||||
Appreciation | ||||||||||||||||
Fund | Appreciation | (Depreciation) | (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||
Growth Fund | $ | 24,203,383 | ($ | 1,992,463 | ) | $ | 22,210,920 | |||||||||
Opportunity Fund | $ | 22,443,041 | ($ | 2,183,862 | ) | $ | 20,259,179 | |||||||||
Realty Fund | $ | 25,910 | ($ | 1,231,343 | ) | ($1,205,433 | ) | |||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | $ | 38,967 | ($ | 1,487,090 | ) | ($1,448,123 | ) | |||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | $ | 20,899 | ($ | 116,213 | ) | ($95,314 | ) |
8) Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
9) Reclassification:
In accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 93-2, the components of the net assets of the Opportunity Fund have been reclassified to the extent that the net investment loss of $44,491 sustained during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, which represents a permanent difference for income tax purposes, has been reclassified as a decrease in the net capital paid in.
10) Net Investment Income and Net Realized Capital Losses É Realty Fund:
The Net Investment Income on the Realty Fund includes Estimated Return of Capital as of December 31, 1999.
As of December 31, 1999, the Realty Fund had accumulated net realized capital loss carryovers of ($99,788) expiring in 2006 and ($232,203) expiring in 2007. To the extent that the Realty Fund realizes future net capital gains, those gains will be offset by any unused capital loss carryovers.
11) Financial Instruments Disclosure:
There are no reportable financial instruments that have any off balance sheet risk as of December 31, 1999.
28
McCurdy & Associates CPAs, Inc.
27955 Clemens Road
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Phone: (440) 835-8500
Fax: (440) 835-1093
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Johnson Mutual funds Trust
We have audited the statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of the Johnson Mutual Funds Trust (comprising, respectively, of the Growth Fund, the Opportunity Fund, the Realty Fund, the Fixed Income Fund, and the Municipal Income Fund) as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements of operations, the statements of changes in net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 1999, by correspondence with the custodian. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the respective portfolios constituting the Johnson Mutual Funds Trust as of December 31, 1999, the results of the operations, the changes in their net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
McCurdy & Associates CPAs, Inc.
Westlake, Ohio 44145
January 21, 2000
29
Trustees and Officers
Timothy E. Johnson John W. Craig Ronald H. McSwain Kenneth S. Shull |
Trustee, President Independent Trustee Independent Trustee Independent Trustee |
|
Dale H. Coates Richard T. Miller Dianna J. Rosenberger David C. Tedford |
Vice President Vice President CFO, Treasurer Secretary |
Transfer Agent and Fund Accountant
Johnson Financial, Inc.
3777 West Fork Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45247
(513) 661-3100 (800) 541-0170
Custodian
The Provident Bank
Three East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Auditors
McCurdy & Associates CPAs, Inc.
27955 Clemens Road
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Legal Counsel
Brown, Cummins & Brown Co., L.P.A.
3500 Carew Tower
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when accompanied or preceded
by the Trusts prospectus, which illustrates each Funds objectives, policies, management fees,
and other information that may be helpful in making an investment decision.
|