|
Previous: JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST, NSAR-A, EX-27, 2000-08-30 |
Next: GOVERNMENT SEC INC FD MON PYMT U S TREAS SER 23 D A F, 24F-2NT, 2000-08-30 |
OUR MESSAGE TO YOU | ||||||||
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES | ||||||||
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | ||||||||
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS | ||||||||
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS | ||||||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2000 UNAUDITED |
Johnson Growth Fund
INVESTMENT ADVISER:
Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc.
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
Table of Contents
Our Message to You | 1 | |
Performance Review and Management Discussion | ||
Growth Fund | 2 | |
Opportunity Fund | 3 | |
Realty Fund | 4 | |
Fixed Income Fund | 5 | |
Municipal Income Fund | 6 | |
Portfolio of Investments | ||
Growth Fund | 7-8 | |
Opportunity Fund | 9-10 | |
Realty Fund | 11 | |
Fixed Income Fund | 12-13 | |
Municipal Income Fund | 14-15 | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 16 | |
Statement of Operations | 17 | |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | ||
Stock Funds | 18 | |
Bond Funds | 19 | |
Financial Highlights | ||
Growth Fund | 20 | |
Opportunity Fund | 21 | |
Realty Fund | 22 | |
Fixed Income Fund | 23 | |
Municipal Income Fund | 24 | |
Notes to the Financial Statements | 25-27 | |
Trustees, Officers, Transfer Agent, Fund Accountant, Custodian, Auditors, Legal Counsel | Back Page |
OUR MESSAGE TO YOU |
August 29, 2000
Dear Shareholder:
Both the broad stock and bond markets experienced relatively flat returns for the first half of 2000. Exceptions to otherwise flat returns were our Opportunity Fund, containing mainly mid-sized firms, which increased 9.13%, and a big advance in our Realty Fund, up 13.80% for the first half. Smaller and more value-based securities have begun to show positive returns while the broad market of larger growth companies are taking a pause from the torrid pace of the past decade.
The Federal Reserves increase in interest rates is beginning to provide a brake to our rapidly growing economy, which should be healthy in the long run. Excessively high prices of certain stocks, especially the highflying negative cash flow technology companies, will take more time to adjust to normal market valuations. The sustainability and growth in earnings and cash flows are the major determinates of value in the long run.
On the next several pages, weve commented on the performance of each of the Funds for the first half of the year. The first five pages of this Semi-Annual report include a review of each Funds relative performance as compared to the appropriate Index. The remainder of the report lists the stocks and bonds held in each of the funds as well as, other financial data and notes.
Thank you for your continued confidence during this turbulent financial market environment and we appreciate your stance as long-term investors. We will continue to offer our quality approach to security selection and portfolio management to meet your investing goals. As always, please feel free to call if you have questions.
Sincerely, | |
![]() |
|
Timothy E. Johnson, President | |
Johnson Mutual Funds |
1
GROWTH FUND | Performance Review June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
$10,000 Initial Investment Since Inception
Growth Fund | S&P 500 Index | |||||||
1993 | $10,000.0 | $10,000.0 | ||||||
6/93 | $10,240.0 | $10,491.2 | ||||||
1994 | $10,596.8 | $11,009.8 | ||||||
6/94 | $10,009.2 | $10,636.9 | ||||||
1995 | $10,149.9 | $11,154.6 | ||||||
6/95 | $11,825.2 | $13,409.3 | ||||||
1996 | $13,358.6 | $15,341.6 | ||||||
6/96 | $14,393.3 | $16,889.8 | ||||||
1997 | $15,609.7 | $18,861.7 | ||||||
6/97 | $18,284.2 | $22,748.8 | ||||||
1998 | $20,911.0 | $25,152.9 | ||||||
6/98 | $24,380.3 | $29,611.8 | ||||||
1999 | $26,995.4 | $32,341.3 | ||||||
6/99 | $27,690.9 | $36,365.0 | ||||||
2000 | $30,047.7 | $38,891.0 | ||||||
6/00 | $29,382.1 | $38,702.0 |
For periods ending June 30, 2000:
Average Annual | ||||||||||||||||
Total Returns (a) | ||||||||||||||||
6 Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended | 1 | 5 | 7.5 Years | |||||||||||||
6/30/00 | Year | Years | (b) | |||||||||||||
Growth Fund | -2.22% | 6.11% | 19.96% | 15.45% | ||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | -0.42% | 7.25% | 23.80% | 19.92% |
(a) The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Standard & Poors 500 Index. | |
(b) Inception of the Growth Fund was January 4, 1993. |
As of | As of | |||||||
Top Ten Holdings: | 6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | ||||||
EMC Corporation | 5.4 | % | 3.9% | |||||
General Electric | 4.1 | % | 3.8% | |||||
Microsoft Corporation | 4.1 | % | 3.8% | |||||
Cisco Systems | 4.0 | % | 4.1% | |||||
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | 3.9 | % | 3.4% | |||||
Intel Corporation | 3.4 | % | 2.7% | |||||
Pfizer Incorporated | 3.1 | % | 1.6% | * | ||||
Exxon Mobil Corporation | 3.0 | % | 3.0% | |||||
Texas Instruments | 2.8 | % | 0.9% | * | ||||
Walgreen Company | 2.7 | % | 2.5% | * | ||||
* Not in the Top 10 as of 12/31/99. |
The rate of return on the Growth Fund for the first half of 2000 was -2.22%. For the same six-month period, the Standard and Poors 500 Index returned -0.42%. U.S. equities, as represented by various market indexes, were generally flat to negative for the period. The Dow Jones Industrial Average returned -6.02% and the NASDAQ Index returned -2.46%.
Only four of the eleven S&P economic sectors experienced positive returns in the six-month period, which were health care (+23%), utilities (+13%), energy (+4%), and technology (+3%). The Growth Fund was helped by having greater weights than the Index in the health care and energy sectors. The technology weight in the Fund was close to that of the S&P 500 Index, and therefore, a rather neutral influence. The Growth Fund did not own any utility stocks and, as a result, did not participate in the good returns available in that sector. Sector weights within the fund did not change significantly during the period. The largest changes were a reduction of the allocation in consumer cyclical stocks from 15% early in the year to 11% as of June 30, 2000 and an increase in the health care allocation from 12% to 15%.
The Growth Fund remains a well-diversified equity fund with a large-cap growth bias. Valuation characteristics are similar to those of the S&P 500 Index. Following four years of very high equity returns, the first half of the year 2000 has been a disappointment. However, many forecasters believe that the Federal Reserve is finished with its program of increasing interest rates which could benefit the stock market for the last half of 2000.
Growth Fund Objective: | Long-Term Capital Growth | |
Primary Asset Category: | Stocks of Larger-Sized Growth Companies |
2
OPPORTUNITY FUND | Performance Review June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
$10,000 Initial Investment Since Inception
Growth Fund | S&P MidCap Index | |||||||
1994 | ||||||||
5/16/94 | $10,000.0 | $10,000.0 | ||||||
1995 | $10,499.1 | $10,414.0 | ||||||
6/95 | $12,291.2 | $12,251.7 | ||||||
1996 | $13,152.2 | $13,636.6 | ||||||
6/96 | $14,364.5 | $14,893.4 | ||||||
1997 | $16,190.3 | $16,258.8 | ||||||
6/97 | $18,013.1 | $18,371.3 | ||||||
1998 | $20,603.9 | $21,499.9 | ||||||
6/98 | $23,331.3 | $23,353.4 | ||||||
1999 | $24,503.9 | $25,465.0 | ||||||
6/99 | $25,843.4 | $27,208.0 | ||||||
2000 | $27,604.8 | $29,233.0 | ||||||
6/00 | $30,125.6 | $31,849.0 |
For periods ending June 30, 2000:
Average Annual | ||||||||||||||||
Total Return (a) | ||||||||||||||||
6 Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended | 1 | 5 | 6.1 Years | |||||||||||||
6/30/00 | Year | Years | (b) | |||||||||||||
Opportunity Fund | 9.13% | 16.57% | 19.64% | 19.82% | ||||||||||||
S&P MidCap Index | 8.98% | 16.96% | 21.17% | 20.77% |
(a) The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Standard & Poors MidCap Index. | |
(b) Inception of the Opportunity Fund was May 16, 1994. |
As of | As of | |||||||
Top Ten Holdings: | 6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | ||||||
EMC Corporation | 5.4% | 5.7% | ||||||
ADC Telecommunication | 4.5% | 2.3% | * | |||||
Forest Laboratories | 4.1% | 3.0% | ||||||
Altera Corporation | 3.9% | 2.6% | ||||||
Elan Corporation | 3.8% | 1.1% | * | |||||
Vitesse Corporation | 3.8% | 3.5% | ||||||
Smith International, Inc. | 3.5% | 2.6% | * | |||||
Devon Energy Corp. | 3.3% | 1.8% | * | |||||
Ecolab, Inc. | 3.3% | 2.9% | * | |||||
Watson Pharmaceutical | 3.3% | 1.3% | * | |||||
* Not in the Top 10 as of 12/31/99. |
The Opportunity Fund had a return of 9.13% compared to a return of 8.98% on the Standard & Poors MidCap Index (MidCap Index) for the first six months of 2000.
As was the case in the large-cap market, health care was one of the best performing sectors within the S&P MidCap Index with a return of 52%. The energy sector was in fact the strongest sector with a return of 55%. The Opportunity Fund had a greater weighting than the MidCap Index in both of these sectors. The technology and capital goods sectors were also strong performers in the period with returns of 33% and 25%, respectively. The largest allocation in the Opportunity Fund is to the technology sector with a weight of 30% as of June 30, 2000. The most significant changes in the six-month period involved the consumer cyclical and health care sectors. The health care allocation was increased from 10% to 16% in the period while consumer cyclical stocks were reduced from 20% to 13%.
The Opportunity Fund had a portfolio of 56 stocks as of June 30, 2000 with the top ten holdings representing 40% of the total fund value. The portfolio has a growth bias relative to the S&P MidCap Index. Consensus long-term earnings growth is at 24% for the portfolio versus 19% for the index companies. While midcap stock indexes outperformed large-cap indexes in the six-month period, there still remains a large disparity of performance favoring large-cap stocks over the past five years. And as a result, valuation is still more compelling in the midcap sector.
Opportunity Fund Objective: | Long-Term Capital Appreciation | |
Primary Asset Category: | Stocks of Medium/ Small-Sized Growth Companies |
3
REALTY FUND | Performance Review June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
$10,000 Initial Investment Since Inception
Realty Fund | NAREIT Index | |||||||
1998 | $10,000.00 | $10,000.00 | ||||||
6/98 | $9,445.82 | $9,497.00 | ||||||
1999 | $8,143.90 | $8,250.00 | ||||||
6/99 | $8,573.65 | $8,644.00 | ||||||
2000 | $7,942.45 | $7,869.00 | ||||||
6/00 | $9,038.64 | $8,906.00 |
For periods ending June 30, 2000:
Average Annual | ||||||||||||
Total Returns (a) | ||||||||||||
6 Months | ||||||||||||
Ended | 1 | 2.5 Years | ||||||||||
6/30/00 | Year | (b) | ||||||||||
Realty Fund | 13.80 | % | 5.42 | % | -3.96 | % | ||||||
NAREIT Index | 13.18 | % | 3.03 | % | -4.54 | % |
(a) The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the NAREIT Index. | |
(b) Inception of the Realty Fund was January 2, 1998. | |
(c) Performance for the Realty Fund and the NAREIT Index are so similar that it is difficult to discern the two distinct lines. |
As of | As of | |||||||
Top Ten Holdings: | 6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | ||||||
Duke-Weeks Realty | 4.5 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||
Equity Office Property | 4.3 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||
Equity Residential Prop. | 4.3 | % | 3.6 | %* | ||||
Apartment Investment Mgt. | 4.3 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||
Avalon Bay Comm. Inc. | 4.3 | % | 4.4 | % | ||||
Prologis Trust | 4.0 | % | 3.3 | %* | ||||
Archstone Comm. Trust | 3.9 | % | 3.7 | %* | ||||
Boston Properties, Inc. | 3.7 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||
Essex Property Trust, Inc. | 3.7 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||
Kimco Realty | 3.7 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||
* Not in the Top 10 as of 12/31/99. |
The Realty Fund had a rate of return of 13.80% for the first half of 2000 compared to a return of 13.18% for the National Association of Real Estate Investments Trust Index (NAREIT Index.) Real estate investment trust (REIT) securities benefited in the first half of 2000 from increased volatility and uncertainty in the broader market as the Federal reserve endeavored to extend the current economic expansion by raising interest rates. This change in sentiment caused investors to search out companies with stable earnings, predictable cash flows, higher dividends and attractive valuations. REITs fit that definition. A good way to gauge investor sentiment is to monitor flow of funds into mutual funds. In the second quarter alone, REITs saw positive cash flows of $389 million. That is the highest level since the first quarter in 1998. It appears that the solid underlying property fundamentals which fuel stable growth in earnings are gaining recognition in the market.
For the first half of 2000, MidCap stocks have done better than their large-cap counterparts. The Realty Fund has an average market capitalization of $2.4 billion vs. $755 million for the NAREIT index, so while the Fund has a larger capitalization vs. the Index, it still falls within the mid-cap area, and has performed well. Additionally, the Realty Fund also utilizes a growth approach where the estimated earnings growth for 2000 in the Fund is 14.7% vs. the Indexs estimated earnings growth of 7.03%. Expectations are that the current interest rate environment will further restrain new property development. As occupancy levels move up and the amount of new space being brought to the market slows, the price charged to tenants will increase, driving future growth, and benefiting REITs.
The Realty Fund continues to utilize a conservative quality approach when selecting individual securities. The strategy employed focuses on stocks with above average growth prospects within their peer group. The best performing property types through June 2000 were lodging (+19.6%), office/industrial (+16.1%), specialty (+17%) and apartments (+14.8%.) The worst performing property type through June 2000 was health care, which was up 2.3%.
Realty Fund Objective: | Long-Term Capital Growth and Above Average Income | |
Primary Asset Category: | Real Estate Related Equity Securities |
4
FIXED INCOME FUND | Performance Review June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
$10,000 Initial Investment Since Inception
Lehman Intermediate Government | ||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | Corporate Index | |||||||
1993 | $10,000 | $10,000 | ||||||
6/93 | $10,694.4 | $10,576.2 | ||||||
1994 | $10,954.5 | $10,832.8 | ||||||
6/94 | $10,404.7 | $10,549.4 | ||||||
1995 | $10,392 | $10,623.7 | ||||||
6/95 | $11,585.8 | $11,644 | ||||||
1996 | $12,231.1 | $12,253 | ||||||
6/96 | $12,061.5 | $12,227 | ||||||
1997 | $12,611.6 | $12,749 | ||||||
6/97 | $12,802.6 | $13,109 | ||||||
1998 | $13,675.9 | $13,752 | ||||||
6/98 | $14,189.8 | $14,229 | ||||||
1999 | $14,913.2 | $14,912 | ||||||
6/99 | $14,441.7 | $14,825 | ||||||
2000 | $14,363.7 | $14,969 | ||||||
6/00 | $14,654.4 | $15,452 |
For periods ending June 30, 2000:
Average Annual | ||||||||||||||||
Total Returns (a) | ||||||||||||||||
6 Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended | 1 | 5 | 7.5 Years | |||||||||||||
6/30/00 | Year | Years | (b) | |||||||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | 2.02% | 1.47% | 4.81% | 5.23% | ||||||||||||
Lehman Int. G/ C Index | 3.22% | 4.23% | 5.82% | 5.97% |
(a) The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Lehman Brothers Intermediate Government Corporate Bond Index. | |
(b) Inception of the Fixed Income Fund was January 4, 1993. |
Quality Allocation
AAA | 49.2% | |||
AA | 6% | |||
A | 36% | |||
BBB | 8.8% |
The Fixed Income Fund had a rate of return of 2.02% for the first half of 2000 as compared to a return of 3.22% for the Lehman Brothers Intermediate Government/ Corporate Index. The environment during the first six months of the year has been marked by rising interest rates as the Federal Reserve attempted to slow the pace of economic growth and by reduced Treasury bond supply as a result of federal budget surpluses. These two factors have combined to create a phenomenon known as a yield curve inversion, where short-term Treasury yields are higher than long-term Treasury yields. Short rates have been pushed higher by the Federal Reserves tight monetary policy, while long rates have been driven lower by federal budget surpluses. These surpluses have caused the Treasury Department to issue fewer Treasury bonds and buy back longer maturity Treasuries.
In this environment the Fixed Income Fund has lagged the performance of the Index. While the Funds longer weighted average maturity was beneficial to performance, the Funds emphasis on corporate bonds was detrimental to relative performance. Corporate bonds have lagged Treasuries as less issuance and buy-backs have bolstered Treasury bond prices. However, the funds emphasis on corporate bonds should be beneficial going forward as Corporate bond yields return to a more normal historical relationship to Treasuries.
The Fixed Income Fund continues its focus on high-quality securities. Each security within the Fund is rated investment-grade quality by both Moodys and Standard and Poors, with over 90% of the assets rated A or better as indicated in the Quality Allocation Chart on this page. These highly rated securities are considered to have adequate to strong protection of principal and interest payments, and will help provide a stable portfolio valuation as economic circumstances change in the future.
Fixed Income Fund Objective: | Income and Capital Preservation | |
Primary Asset Category: | Investment-Grade Government/ Corporate Bonds |
5
MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND | Performance Review June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
![]() |
|
$10,000 Initial Investment Since Inception |
Lehman Five-Year G.O. Municipal | ||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | Index | |||||||
1994 | ||||||||
5/16/94 | $10,000.0 | $10,000.0 | ||||||
1995 | $10,081.2 | $10,117.5 | ||||||
6/95 | $10,713.1 | $10,796.9 | ||||||
1996 | $11,177.8 | $11,295.1 | ||||||
6/96 | $11,185.3 | $11,380.7 | ||||||
1997 | $11,560.8 | $11,819.0 | ||||||
6/97 | $11,786.0 | $12,094.0 | ||||||
1998 | $12,281.4 | $12,586.0 | ||||||
6/98 | $12,489.1 | $12,862.0 | ||||||
1999 | $12,919.4 | $13,322.0 | ||||||
6/99 | $12,699.0 | $13,302.0 | ||||||
2000 | $12,759.7 | $13,415.0 | ||||||
6/00 | $13,114.7 | $13,789.0 |
For periods ending June 30, 2000:
Average Annual | ||||||||||||||||
Total Returns (a) | ||||||||||||||||
6 Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended | 1 | 5 | 6.1 Years | |||||||||||||
6/30/00 | Year | Years | (b) | |||||||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | 2.78% | 3.27% | 4.13% | 4.55% | ||||||||||||
Lehman 5 Yr. G.O. Index | 2.79% | 3.66% | 5.01% | 5.41% |
(a) The data represented on this page represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future performance. The value of your shares may fluctuate and be worth more or less than their original cost at the time of redemption. The average annual total return numbers above include changes in the Funds or Indexs share price plus reinvestment of any dividends and capital gains. The Funds performance is after all fees. The Index does not include any fees. A shareholder cannot invest directly in the Lehman Five-Year General Obligation Municipal Index. | |
(b) Inception of the Municipal Income Fund was May 16, 1994. |
Quality Allocation
AAA | 54.8% | |||
AA | 19.8% | |||
A | 13.2% | |||
NR | 12.2% |
The Municipal Income Fund had a total rate of return of 2.78% for the first half of 2000 and compares to a return almost identical to the Lehman Five-Year General Obligation Index of 2.79%. Municipal bonds provided returns very comparable to taxable bond returns during this period and after adjusting for the tax-free nature of the municipal bonds, they substantially outperformed. Municipal bond yields are currently very attractive compared to Treasury bond yields. Investors in all but the very lowest tax brackets pick-up substantial after-tax yield in municipal bonds versus Treasury bonds.
As has been the case since its inception, the credit quality of the Municipal Income Fund remains very high. Over 50% of the securities in the Fund are rated AAA, the highest rating category, with over 90% of assets rated in the highest three rating categories AAA, AA, and A. Over 98% of the income generated by the Fund is from Ohio municipal bonds, so most of the income earned is exempt from Ohio State Income Tax in addition to being exempt from Federal Income Taxes.
Municipal Income Fund Objective: | Tax-Free Income and Capital Preservation | |
Primary Asset Category: | Intermediate-Term Ohio Municipal Bonds |
6
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | |||||||
Aerospace | |||||||||
General Dynamics Corporation | 24,000 | 1,254,000 | |||||||
Total Aerospace 2.0% | $ | 1,254,000 | |||||||
Computer Hardware | |||||||||
Sun Microsystems Inc.* | 27,080 | 2,462,587 | |||||||
Total Computer Hardware 3.9% | $ | 2,462,587 | |||||||
Computer Networking | |||||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.* | 39,600 | 2,517,075 | |||||||
Total Computer Networking 3.9% | $ | 2,517,075 | |||||||
Computer Peripheral | |||||||||
EMC Corporation* | 44,400 | 3,416,025 | |||||||
Lexmark International Group* | 17,000 | 1,143,250 | |||||||
Total Computer Peripheral 7.2% | $ | 4,559,275 | |||||||
Computer Software | |||||||||
Computer Associates Int., Inc. | 25,400 | 1,300,163 | |||||||
Microsoft Corporation* | 32,400 | 2,592,000 | |||||||
Total Computer Software 6.1% | $ | 3,892,163 | |||||||
Computer Software Services | |||||||||
America Online Inc.* | 9,000 | 474,750 | |||||||
Compuware Corporation* | 44,000 | 456,500 | |||||||
Total Computer Software Services 1.5% | $ | 931,250 | |||||||
Electrical Equipment | |||||||||
General Electric Company | 48,690 | 2,580,570 | |||||||
Total Electrical Equipment 4.0% | $ | 2,580,570 | |||||||
Electronics Semi-Conductors | |||||||||
Applied Material Inc.* | 14,000 | 1,268,750 | |||||||
Intel Corporation | 16,000 | 2,139,000 | |||||||
Texas Instruments | 26,000 | 1,785,875 | |||||||
Total Electronics Semi-Conductors 8.2% | $ | 5,193,625 | |||||||
Financial Miscellaneous | |||||||||
American Express Company | 27,600 | 1,438,650 | |||||||
Fannie Mae | 25,500 | 1,330,781 | |||||||
Total Financial Miscellaneous 4.3% | $ | 2,769,431 | |||||||
Financial Regional Banks | |||||||||
Bank of NY Co., Inc. | 35,000 | 1,627,500 | |||||||
Fifth Third Bancorp | 22,000 | 1,391,500 | |||||||
Firstar Corportion | 64,000 | 1,348,000 | |||||||
Total Financial Reg. Banks 6.9% | $ | 4,367,000 | |||||||
Health Care Diverse | |||||||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 24,000 | 1,398,000 | |||||||
Total Health Care Diverse 2.2% | $ | 1,398,000 | |||||||
Health Care Drugs | |||||||||
Pfizer, Inc. | 41,300 | 1,982,400 | |||||||
Schering-Plough Corporation | 26,000 | 1,313,000 | |||||||
Smithkline Beecham PLC ADR | 22,200 | 1,447,162 | |||||||
Total Health Care Drugs 7.4% | $ | 4,742,562 | |||||||
Health Care Products | |||||||||
Johnson and Johnson | 15,200 | 1,548,500 | |||||||
Medtronic Corporation | 30,870 | 1,537,712 | |||||||
Total Health Care Products 4.9% | $ | 3,086,212 | |||||||
Household Products | |||||||||
Procter & Gamble Company | 22,900 | 1,311,025 | |||||||
Total Household Products 2.0% | $ | 1,311,025 | |||||||
Industrial Services | |||||||||
Cintas Corporation | 32,500 | 1,192,344 | |||||||
Total Industrial Services 1.9% | $ | 1,192,344 | |||||||
Manufacturing | |||||||||
Dover Corporation | 32,840 | 1,332,073 | |||||||
Total Manufacturing 2.1% | $ | 1,332,073 | |||||||
Oil Domestic | |||||||||
Marathon Group Inc. (USX) | 45,325 | 1,135,958 | |||||||
Total Oil Domestic 1.8% | $ | 1,135,958 | |||||||
Oil International | |||||||||
Exxon Mobil Corporation | 23,891 | 1,875,443 | |||||||
Royal Dutch Petrolem | 22,000 | 1,354,375 | |||||||
Total Oil International 5.1% | $ | 3,229,818 | |||||||
Oil & Gas Drilling & Equipment | |||||||||
Halliburton Company | 32,000 | 1,510,000 | |||||||
Total Oil & Gas Drilling & Equipment 2.4% | $ | 1,510,000 | |||||||
Personal Care | |||||||||
Estee Lauder Company | 33,000 | 1,631,438 | |||||||
Total Personal Care 2.6% | $ | 1,631,438 | |||||||
Retailing | |||||||||
Circuit City Stores | 36,000 | 1,194,750 | |||||||
Kroger Company* | 73,000 | 1,610,562 | |||||||
Staples Inc.* | 69,207 | 1,064,058 | |||||||
Walgreen Company | 52,500 | 1,689,844 | |||||||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 28,000 | 1,613,500 | |||||||
Total Retailing 11.3% | $ | 7,172,714 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
7
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | |||||||
Telecommunication Equipment | |||||||||
Lucent Technology, Inc. | 24,300 | 1,439,775 | |||||||
Total Telecomm. Equipment 2.3% | $ | 1,439,775 | |||||||
Telecommunication Long Distance | |||||||||
AT & T Corporation | 25,000 | 790,625 | |||||||
Sprint Corporation | 30,000 | 1,530,000 | |||||||
Total Telecommunication Long Distance 3.6% | $ | 2,320,625 | |||||||
Total Common Stocks 97.6% | $ | 62,029,520 | |||||||
(Common Stock Identified Cost $42,339,893) | |||||||||
Cash Equivalents | |||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves Money Market Fund | 1,517,341 | ||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents 2.4% | $ | 1,517,341 | |||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified Cost $1,517,341) | |||||||||
Total Portfolio Value 100.0% | $ | 63,546,861 | |||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $43,857,234) | |||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 2,017 | |||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 63,548,878 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
8
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | |||||||
Capital Goods | |||||||||
Danaher Corporation | 20,000 | 988,750 | |||||||
Republic Services Inc.* | 40,000 | 640,000 | |||||||
Total Capital Goods 2.2% | $ | 1,628,750 | |||||||
Chemicals | |||||||||
Ecolab Inc. | 62,000 | 2,421,875 | |||||||
Total Chemicals 3.2% | $ | 2,421,875 | |||||||
Communication Equipment | |||||||||
ADC Telecommunications, Inc.* | 40,000 | 3,355,000 | |||||||
American Tower Corp.* | 12,000 | 500,250 | |||||||
Efficient Networks Inc.* | 10,000 | 735,625 | |||||||
Total Comm. Equipment 6.2% | $ | 4,590,875 | |||||||
Computer Peripheral | |||||||||
EMC Corporation* | 52,000 | 4,000,750 | |||||||
Lexmark Intl Group Inc.* | 10,400 | 699,400 | |||||||
Total Computer Peripheral 6.3% | $ | 4,700,150 | |||||||
Computer Software | |||||||||
Allaire Corp.* | 10,000 | 367,500 | |||||||
BMC Software, Inc.* | 22,500 | 820,897 | |||||||
Go.Com* | 9,200 | 109,825 | |||||||
Network Associates* | 45,000 | 916,875 | |||||||
Siebel Systems, Inc.* | 11,000 | 1,799,188 | |||||||
Sungard Data Systems, Inc.* | 28,000 | 868,000 | |||||||
Veritas Software Corp.* | 3,500 | 395,555 | |||||||
Total Computer Software 7.1% | $ | 5,277,840 | |||||||
Electronics Equipment | |||||||||
Molex Incorporated | 41,250 | 1,985,156 | |||||||
Total Electronic Equipment 2.7% | $ | 1,985,156 | |||||||
Electronics Semiconductors | |||||||||
Altera Corporation* | 28,500 | 2,905,219 | |||||||
Teradyne, Inc.* | 31,000 | 2,278,500 | |||||||
Vitesse Semiconductor Corp.* | 38,000 | 2,795,375 | |||||||
Total Electronics Semiconductors 10.7% | $ | 7,979,094 | |||||||
Energy Services | |||||||||
Devon Energy Corporation | 44,000 | 2,472,250 | |||||||
Smith International, Inc.* | 36,000 | 2,621,250 | |||||||
Total Energy Services 6.9% | $ | 5,093,500 | |||||||
Financial Brokerage | |||||||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. | 23,000 | 977,500 | |||||||
Total Financial Brokerage 1.3% | $ | 977,500 | |||||||
Financial Consumer Finance | |||||||||
Metris Companies Inc. | 27,000 | 678,375 | |||||||
Total Financial Consumer Finance 0.9% | $ | 678,375 | |||||||
Financial Insurance | |||||||||
AON Corporation | 14,550 | 451,959 | |||||||
Reliastar Financial Corporation | 35,200 | 1,845,800 | |||||||
Total Financial Insurance 3.1% | $ | 2,297,759 | |||||||
Financial Regional Banks | |||||||||
First Tennessee National Corp. | 47,000 | 778,438 | |||||||
National Commerce Bancorp | 30,000 | 481,875 | |||||||
North Fork Bancorp | 61,000 | 922,625 | |||||||
Total Financial Regional Banks 2.9% | $ | 2,182,938 | |||||||
Foods | |||||||||
Tootsie Roll Industries | 18,393 | 643,755 | |||||||
Total Foods 0.9% | $ | 643,755 | |||||||
Health Care Drugs | |||||||||
Elan Corporation PLC, ADR* | 58,000 | 2,809,375 | |||||||
Forest Labs Inc. Class A* | 30,200 | 3,050,200 | |||||||
Mylan Laboratories | 25,300 | 461,725 | |||||||
Watson Pharmaceutical* | 45,000 | 2,418,750 | |||||||
Total Health Care Drugs 11.8% | $ | 8,740,050 | |||||||
Health Care Products | |||||||||
Biomet Inc. | 45,000 | 1,729,687 | |||||||
Sybron International Corp. | 68,500 | 1,357,156 | |||||||
Total Health Care Products 4.2% | $ | 3,086,843 | |||||||
Household Furniture | |||||||||
Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. | 26,000 | 624,000 | |||||||
Total Household Furniture 0.8% | $ | 624,000 | |||||||
Industrial Services | |||||||||
Cintas Corporation | 18,300 | 671,381 | |||||||
G & K Services, Inc., Class A | 41,700 | 1,045,106 | |||||||
Total Industrial Services 2.3% | $ | 1,716,487 | |||||||
Lodging Hotel | |||||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruise | 30,000 | 555,000 | |||||||
Total Lodging Hotel 0.7% | $ | 555,000 | |||||||
Manufacture Diverse | |||||||||
Johnson Controls, Inc. | 13,000 | 667,063 | |||||||
Total Manufacture-Diverse 0.9% | $ | 667,063 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
9
Common Stocks | Shares | Dollar Value | |||||||
Natural Gas | |||||||||
National Fuel Gas Company | 12,000 | 585,000 | |||||||
Peoples Energy Corporation | 16,000 | 518,000 | |||||||
Total Natural Gas 1.5% | $ | 1,103,000 | |||||||
Oil and Gas | |||||||||
Grant Prideco Inc.* | 31,000 | 775,000 | |||||||
Weatherford International | 31,000 | 1,234,188 | |||||||
Total Oil and Gas 2.7% | $ | 2,009,188 | |||||||
Retailing | |||||||||
Abercrombie and Fitch* | 20,000 | 243,750 | |||||||
BJs Wholesale Club Inc.* | 68,000 | 2,244,000 | |||||||
Dollar General Corporation | 57,187 | 1,115,146 | |||||||
Linens n Things, Inc.* | 19,000 | 515,375 | |||||||
RadioShack Corporation | 33,000 | 1,563,375 | |||||||
Total Retailing 7.6% | $ | 5,681,646 | |||||||
Specialty Printing | |||||||||
Valassis Communications Inc.* | 17,000 | 648,125 | |||||||
Total Specialty Printing 0.9% | $ | 648,125 | |||||||
Telecommunication Long Distance | |||||||||
Metromedia Fiber Network* | 12,000 | 476,250 | |||||||
Qwest Communications Intl* | 36,150 | 1,796,203 | |||||||
U.S. Cellular Corp.* | 6,000 | 378,000 | |||||||
Total Telecommunication Long Distance 3.6% | $ | 2,650,453 | |||||||
Telecommunication Services | |||||||||
Broadwing, Inc. | 56,000 | 1,452,500 | |||||||
Century Tele Enterprises, Inc. | 53,000 | 1,523,750 | |||||||
Telephone and Data Systems | 11,500 | 1,152,875 | |||||||
Total Telecommunication Services 5.6% | $ | 4,129,125 | |||||||
Total Common Stocks 97.0% | $ | 72,068,547 | |||||||
(Common Stock Identified Cost $50,161,603) | |||||||||
Cash Equivalents | |||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves Money Market Fund | 2,248,491 | ||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents 3.0% | 2,248,491 | ||||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified Cost $2,248,491) | |||||||||
Total Portfolio Value 100.0% | $ | 74,317,038 | |||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $52,410,094) | |||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | (2,198 | ) | ||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 74,314,840 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
10
REALTY FUND | Portfolio of Investments as of June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
Common Stocks (REITS) | Shares | Dollar Value | |||||||
Apartments | |||||||||
Apartment Investment and Management, Co. | 7,345 | 317,671 | |||||||
Archstone Communities Trust | 13,655 | 287,608 | |||||||
Avalon Bay Communities, Inc. | 7,592 | 316,966 | |||||||
BRE Properties, Inc. | 6,130 | 177,004 | |||||||
Camden Property Trust | 5,815 | 170,816 | |||||||
Equity Residential Properties Trust | 6,975 | 320,850 | |||||||
Essex Property Trust, Inc. | 6,570 | 275,940 | |||||||
Post Properties, Inc. | 5,055 | 222,420 | |||||||
Total Apartments 28.3% | $ | 2,089,275 | |||||||
Diversified | |||||||||
Cousins Properties Inc. | 5,600 | 215,600 | |||||||
Vorando Realty Trust | 7,500 | 260,625 | |||||||
Total Diversified 6.5% | $ | 476,225 | |||||||
Lodging and Hotels | |||||||||
Flecor Lodging Trust | 6,100 | 112,850 | |||||||
Starwood Hotels and Resorts | 7,460 | 241,051 | |||||||
Wyndham International* | 29,650 | 74,125 | |||||||
Total Lodging and Hotels 5.8% | $ | 428,026 | |||||||
Office and Industrial | |||||||||
AMB Property Corporation | 6,700 | 152,844 | |||||||
Boston Properties, Inc. | 7,175 | 277,134 | |||||||
Cali Realty Corporation | 6,795 | 174,547 | |||||||
Duke Realty Investments | 14,860 | 332,493 | |||||||
Equity Office Properties | 11,645 | 320,965 | |||||||
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 8,680 | 256,060 | |||||||
Highwoods Properties, Inc. | 8,150 | 195,600 | |||||||
Kilroy Realty Corporation | 6,345 | 164,573 | |||||||
Liberty Property Trust | 6,630 | 171,966 | |||||||
Prentiss Properties Trust | 8,350 | 200,400 | |||||||
Prologis Trust | 14,005 | 298,482 | |||||||
Spieker Properties, Inc. | 5,305 | 250,661 | |||||||
Total Office and Industrial 37.9% | $ | 2,795,725 | |||||||
Retail | |||||||||
General Growth Properties | 7,635 | 242,411 | |||||||
Kimco Realty Corporation | 6,735 | 276,135 | |||||||
Macerich Company | 4,830 | 106,562 | |||||||
Regency Realty Corporation | 6,940 | 164,825 | |||||||
Simon Properties Group, Inc. | 9,745 | 216,217 | |||||||
Weingarten Realty Investors | 2,955 | 119,308 | |||||||
Total Retail 15.2% | $ | 1,125,458 | |||||||
Specialty | |||||||||
Pinnacle Holdings Inc.* | 3,800 | 205,200 | |||||||
Total Specialty 2.8% | $ | 205,200 | |||||||
Total Common Stocks 96.5% | $ | 7,119,909 | |||||||
(Common Stock Identified Cost $7,558,311) | |||||||||
Cash Equivalents | |||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves Money Market Fund | 261,885 | ||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents 3.5% | $ | 261,885 | |||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified Cost $261,885) | |||||||||
Total Portfolio Value 100.0% | $ | 7,381,794 | |||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $7,820,196) | |||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 48,623 | |||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 7,430,417 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
11
Fixed Income Securities Bonds | Face | Dollar Value | |||||||
Bank Bonds Major Regional | |||||||||
Bank One Corp., 9.875%, 3/1/09 | 250,000 | 279,063 | |||||||
Bank One Corp., 7.125%, 5/15/07 | 400,000 | 384,500 | |||||||
Comerica Bank Sub. Note, 6.875%, 3/1/08 | 250,000 | 232,812 | |||||||
First Union Corp., 7.5%, 7/15/06 | 500,000 | 489,375 | |||||||
Mellon Financial Co., 6.70%, 3/1/08 | 500,000 | 468,750 | |||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 6.875%, 7/15/07 | 500,000 | 473,750 | |||||||
Provident Bank, 6.375%, 1/15/04 | 500,000 | 469,375 | |||||||
Star Bank N.A., 6.625%, 12/15/06 | 475,000 | 447,688 | |||||||
SunTrust Banks Inc., 6.50%, 1/15/08 | 500,000 | 472,500 | |||||||
Total Major Regional Banks 12.5% | $ | 3,717,813 | |||||||
Bank Bonds Money Center | |||||||||
Bankers Trust NY Corp., 7.15%, 8/14/12 | 400,000 | 368,000 | |||||||
Total Money Center Banks 1.2% | $ | 368,000 | |||||||
Capital Equipment | |||||||||
Dover Corp., 6.25%, 6/1/08 | 500,000 | 460,625 | |||||||
Honeywell, Inc., 7.125%, 4/15/08 | 400,000 | 391,000 | |||||||
Total Capital Equipment 2.9% | $ | 851,625 | |||||||
Chemicals | |||||||||
Hercules, Inc., 6.625%, 6/1/03 | 250,000 | 239,688 | |||||||
Total Chemicals 0.8% | $ | 239,688 | |||||||
Food and Beverage | |||||||||
Procter & Gamble Company Global Bond Issue, 6.60%, 12/15/04 | 250,000 | 245,625 | |||||||
Sara Lee Corporation, Medium Term Note, 5.70%, 7/14/00 | 250,000 | 250,000 | |||||||
Total Food and Beverage 1.7% | $ | 495,625 | |||||||
Electric Utilities | |||||||||
Carolina Power & Light Co., 6.75%, 10/1/02 | 250,000 | 246,875 | |||||||
Consolidated Edison of New York, 8.125%, 5/1/10 | 400,000 | 411,000 | |||||||
Florida Power & Light Group Capital, 7.375%, 6/1/09 | 500,000 | 486,875 | |||||||
Midwest Power Corp., 7.00%, 2/15/05 | 200,000 | 196,500 | |||||||
National Rural Utilities, 5.70%, 1/15/10 | 500,000 | 431,875 | |||||||
Virginia Electric Co., 6.375%, 3/1/04 | 500,000 | 508,750 | |||||||
Total Electric Utilities 7.7% | $ | 2,281,875 | |||||||
Financial Services | |||||||||
American General Finance, 8.125%, 8/15/09 | 120,000 | 120,300 | |||||||
CIT Group Holdings, 8.375%, 11/1/01 | 250,000 | 252,187 | |||||||
Household Finance Corp. Senior Note, 6.875%, 3/1/03 | 700,000 | 686,000 | |||||||
Merry Land and Investment Co., 7.25%, 6/15/05 | 500,000 | 481,250 | |||||||
Total Financial Services 5.2% | $ | 1,539,737 | |||||||
Household Products | |||||||||
Alberto-Culver Company, 8.25%, 11/1/05 | 425,000 | 428,719 | |||||||
Total Household Products 1.4% | $ | 428,719 | |||||||
Health Care | |||||||||
McKesson Corp., 6.40%, 3/1/08 | 400,000 | 326,500 | |||||||
Total Health Care 1.1% | $ | 326,500 | |||||||
Natural Gas Utilities | |||||||||
Enron Corp., 6.75%, 8/01/09 | 600,000 | 559,500 | |||||||
Total Natural Gas Utilities 1.9% | $ | 559,500 | |||||||
Petroleum | |||||||||
Amoco Corp. Canada, 7.25%, 12/1/02 | 200,000 | 200,500 | |||||||
Total Petroleum 0.7% | $ | 200,500 | |||||||
Publishing | |||||||||
The Tribune Company, 6.875%, 11/1/06 | 500,000 | 485,000 | |||||||
Total Publishing 1.6% | $ | 485,000 | |||||||
Railroads | |||||||||
CSX Transportation Equipment Trust, 6.07%, 3/15/01 | 200,000 | 198,250 | |||||||
Total Railroads 0.7% | $ | 198,250 | |||||||
Retailing | |||||||||
Gap Inc., 6.90%, 9/15/07 | 500,000 | 483,125 | |||||||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 6.375%, 3/1/03 | 200,000 | 197,000 | |||||||
Total Retailing 2.3% | $ | 680,125 |
12
Fixed Income Securities Bonds | Face | Dollar Value | |||||||
Services | |||||||||
Hertz Corp., 6.25%, 3/15/09 | 500,000 | 447,500 | |||||||
Total Services 1.5% | $ | 447,500 | |||||||
Telecommunications | |||||||||
AT & T Corp., 6.00%, 3/15/09 | 500,000 | 445,625 | |||||||
AT & T Corp., 6.75%, 4/1/04 | 500,000 | 488,125 | |||||||
Bellsouth Communications, 5.875%, 1/15/09 | 500,000 | 441,250 | |||||||
GTE Corp., 7.51%, 4/1/09 | 600,000 | 588,750 | |||||||
Southwestern Bell Corp., 6.375%, 4/1/01 | 200,000 | 199,000 | |||||||
Total Telecommunications 7.3% | $ | 2,162,750 | |||||||
United States Government Agency Obligations (A) | |||||||||
FHLB, 8.65%, 5/25/10 | 1,000,000 | 998,750 | |||||||
FHLB, 6.10%, 12/13/10 | 750,000 | 694,060 | |||||||
FHLB, 7.03%, 5/6/11 | 250,000 | 247,468 | |||||||
FHLMC, 6.005%, 12/8/05 | 200,000 | 190,741 | |||||||
FHLMC, 5.95%, 1/19/06 | 400,000 | 380,114 | |||||||
FHLMC, 7.1%, 4/10/07 | 500,000 | 500,740 | |||||||
FHLMC, 5.125%, 10/15/08 | 500,000 | 435,376 | |||||||
FNMA, 7.50%, 2/11/02 | 200,000 | 201,749 | |||||||
FNMA, 7.55%, 4/22/02 | 200,000 | 202,118 | |||||||
FNMA, 5.75%, 4/15/03 | 1,000,000 | 968,993 | |||||||
FNMA, 5.75%, 6/15/05 | 1,000,000 | 947,584 | |||||||
FNMA, 5.75%, 2/15/08 | 500,000 | 459,600 | |||||||
FNMA, 5.25%, 1/15/09 | 1,350,000 | 1,184,687 | |||||||
GNMA, 7.00%, 12/15/25 | 255,601 | 248,733 | |||||||
GNMA, 7.50%, 8/15/26 | 191,020 | 189,767 | |||||||
Total United States Government Agency Obligations 26.5% | $ | 7,850,480 | |||||||
United States Government Agency Obligations Mortgage Backed Securities (A) | |||||||||
FHLMC, CMO Series 1639-PD, 5.60%, 8/15/06 | 46,640 | 46,471 | |||||||
FHLMC, CMO Series 1660-G, 6.25%, 7/15/07 | 250,000 | 247,193 | |||||||
FHLMC, 15 Year Gold, 7.00%, 3/01/11 | 180,007 | 176,801 | |||||||
FHLMC, 8.00%, 6/1/30 | 1,000,000 | 1,005,625 | |||||||
FNMA Dus Pool Series 73894, 6.525%, 12/1/03 | 482,177 | 470,046 | |||||||
FNMA Series 253300, 7.5%, 5/1/20 | 994,600 | 979,991 | |||||||
Total Government Agency Obligations Mortgage Backed Securities 9.9% | 2,926,127 | ||||||||
United States Government Obligations | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury, 7.875%, 8/15/01 | 400,000 | 405,875 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury, 7.875%, 11/15/04 | 500,000 | 529,091 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.50%, 8/15/05 | 500,000 | 505,312 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.875%, 5/15/06 | 500,000 | 514,532 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury, 7.00%, 7/15/06 | 500,000 | 517,969 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.25%, 2/15/07 | 500,000 | 500,469 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury, 6.625%, 5/15/07 | 500,000 | 510,312 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury, 5.50%, 2/15/08 | 400,000 | 383,000 | |||||||
Total United States Government Obligations 13.0% | $ | 3,866,560 | |||||||
Total Fixed Income Bonds 99.9% | $ | 29,626,374 | |||||||
(Fixed Income Identified Cost $30,766,343) | |||||||||
Cash Equivalents | |||||||||
Federated U.S. Treasury Cash Reserves Money Market Fund | 32,229 | ||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents 0.1% | $ | 32,229 | |||||||
(Cash Equivalents Identified Cost $32,229) | |||||||||
Total Portfolio Value 100.0% | $ | 29,658,603 | |||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $30,798,572) | |||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 473,024 | |||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 30,131,627 |
(A) | |||
Abbreviations: | |||
FHLB | Federal Home Loan Bank | ||
FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation | ||
FNMA | Federal National Mortgage Association | ||
GNMA | Government National Mortgage Association |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
13
Dollar | |||||||||
Municipal Income Securities Bonds | Face | Value | |||||||
General Obligation City | |||||||||
Akron, OH, 5.00%, 12/1/05 | 100,000 | 100,529 | |||||||
Cleveland, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 4.9%, 9/1/02 | 50,000 | 50,291 | |||||||
Columbus, OH, 12.375%, 2/15/07 | 25,000 | 35,285 | |||||||
Columbus, OH, Series 2, 5.00%, 6/15/10 | 100,000 | 99,408 | |||||||
Columbus, OH, Tax Increment Financing, (AMBAC Insured), 4.9%, 12/1/11 | 150,000 | 146,223 | |||||||
Loveland, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 4.9%, 12/1/08 | 100,000 | 99,394 | |||||||
Vandalia, OH, 4.80%, 12/1/03 | 75,000 | 75,253 | |||||||
Warder Library, OH, 6.25%, 12/1/03 | 135,000 | 140,813 | |||||||
Westlake, OH, 4.90%, 12/1/04 | 50,000 | 50,289 | |||||||
Youngstown, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.10%, 12/1/11 | 100,000 | 99,528 | |||||||
Total General Obligation City 16.7% | $ | 897,013 | |||||||
General Obligation County | |||||||||
Belmont County, OH (MBIA Insured), 4.50%, 12/1/11 | 155,000 | 143,094 | |||||||
Belmont County, OH (MBIA Insured), 5.10%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 50,642 | |||||||
Delaware County, OH, 5.25%, 12/1/06 | 50,000 | 51,135 | |||||||
Hocking County, OH, 4.90%, 12/1/06 | 50,000 | 48,694 | |||||||
Knox County, OH, 4.75%, 12/1/09 | 60,000 | 57,574 | |||||||
Montgomery County, OH, 5.30%, 12/1/00 | 75,000 | 75,290 | |||||||
Portage County, OH, (MBIA Insured), 5.15%, 12/1/07 | 75,000 | 76,055 | |||||||
Trumbull County, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.25%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 50,995 | |||||||
Washington Township, OH, 4.65%, 12/1/05 | 75,000 | 72,624 | |||||||
Total General Obligation County 11.7% | $ | 626,103 | |||||||
Higher Education | |||||||||
Ohio State Higher Education Facilities, Denison University, 4.90%, 11/1/05 | 75,000 | 75,041 | |||||||
University of Cincinnati, OH General Receipts, 4.75%, 6/1/06 | 50,000 | 49,656 | |||||||
University of Toledo, OH (Prerefunded), 5.9%, 6/1/20 | 105,000 | 109,875 | |||||||
Total Higher Education 4.4% | $ | 234,572 | |||||||
Hospital/Health | |||||||||
Episcopal Retirement Homes, Ohio Hospital Facility Revenue, 5.00%, 1/1/15 | 100,000 | 100,013 | |||||||
Franklin County, OH, The Childrens Hospital Project, 5.20%, 11/1/04 | 50,000 | 49,871 | |||||||
Franklin County, OH, Series 1980 (Grant Hospital) (Prerefunded), 10.25%, 12/1/13 | 65,000 | 75,927 | |||||||
Hamilton County, OH, Hospital Childrens Hospital Medical Center, (MBIA Insured), 5.25%, 5/15/10 | 100,000 | 100,250 | |||||||
Hamilton County, OH, Hospital Facility Revenue, Childrens Hospital, (FGIC Insured), 5.00%, 5/15/06 | 50,000 | 50,035 | |||||||
Hamilton County, OH, Twin Towers Health Care Facility, 5.25%, 10/1/09 | 100,000 | 95,197 | |||||||
Lorain County, OH, Hospital Facility Revenue, Catholic Healthcare Partners, (MBIA Insured), 6.00%, 9/1/07 | 50,000 | 52,695 | |||||||
Lorain County, OH, Revenue Bond, Catholic Healthcare Partners Project (AMBAC Insured), 5.20%, 09/1/10 | 100,000 | 99,868 | |||||||
Montgomery County, OH Hospital (Prerefunded), 5.5%, 12/1/10 | 100,000 | 102,878 | |||||||
Warren County, OH, Hospital (Prerefunded), 7.3%, 11/15/14 | 150,000 | 164,392 | |||||||
Total Hospital/Health 16.6% | $ | 891,126 | |||||||
Revenue Bonds Electric | |||||||||
Weatherford, TX Utility System Revenue, (MBIA Insured), 5.10%, 9/1/03 | 50,000 | 50,504 | |||||||
Total Revenue Bonds Electric 0.9% | $ | 50,504 | |||||||
Revenue Bonds Transportation | |||||||||
Butler County, OH, Transportation Improvement, (FSA Insured), 5.50%, 4/1/09 | 100,000 | 103,156 | |||||||
Ohio State Turnpike Revenue, (Prerefunded), 5.75%, 2/15/24 | 125,000 | 131,161 | |||||||
Ohio State Turnpike Revenue, (Prerefunded), 5.5%, 2/15/26 | 110,000 | 115,094 | |||||||
Total Revenue Bond Transportation 6.5% | $ | 349,411 |
14
Dollar | |||||||||
Municipal Income Securities Bonds | Face | Value | |||||||
Revenue Bonds Water and Sewer | |||||||||
Akron, OH, Sewer System, (MBIA Insured), 5.50% 12/1/07 | 50,000 | 51,716 | |||||||
Butler, OH, Waterworks System, (FSA Insured), 4.40% 12/1/10 | 100,000 | 92,459 | |||||||
Cleveland, OH, Waterworks First Mortgage, Series G (MBIA Insured), 5.25%, 1/1/04 | 50,000 | 50,714 | |||||||
Cleveland, OH, Waterworks Revenue, Series I (FSA Insured), 5.25%, 1/1/10 | 100,000 | 100,991 | |||||||
Columbus, OH, Water and Sewer, 5.00%, 11/01/06 | 100,000 | 100,839 | |||||||
Lorain, OH, Water System, (AMBAC Insured), 4.75%, 4/1/04 | 50,000 | 49,912 | |||||||
Miamisburg, OH, Sewer System, (AMBAC Insured), 4.35%, 11/15/02 | 50,000 | 49,484 | |||||||
Montgomery County, OH, Solid Waste, (MBIA Insured), 5.125%, 11/1/08 | 50,000 | 50,344 | |||||||
Southwest OH, Regl Water District Water-works, (MBIA Insured), 5.25%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 50,971 | |||||||
Warren County, Ohio Water and Sewer Line Extension, Special Assessment Bonds, 5.50%, 12/1/03 | 50,000 | 51,257 | |||||||
Total Revenue Bond Water & Sewer 12.1% | $ | 648,687 | |||||||
School District | |||||||||
Centerburg, OH, 5.25%, 10/15/01 | 40,000 | 40,114 | |||||||
Forest Hills, OH, 4.90%, 12/1/04 | 100,000 | 100,579 | |||||||
Gallia County, OH, 5.00%, 3/1/03 | 25,000 | 24,937 | |||||||
Gallia County, OH, 5.00%, 3/1/04 | 25,000 | 24,883 | |||||||
Indian Valley, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.50%, 12/1/06 | 50,000 | 51,706 | |||||||
Kings Local, OH, 6.4%, 12/1/13 | 150,000 | 164,885 | |||||||
Lakota, OH, 6.25%, 12/1/14 | 100,000 | 106,823 | |||||||
Loveland, OH, School General Obligation, 4.40%, 12/1/08 | 100,000 | 93,389 | |||||||
Northwestern, OH, 4.65%, 12/1/06 | 105,000 | 100,283 | |||||||
Southwestern City, OH, 6.25%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 52,458 | |||||||
Sycamore, OH, Community School District (AMBAC Insured), 4.6%, 12/1/11 | 100,000 | 93,518 | |||||||
West Geauga, OH, (AMBAC Insured), 5.45%, 11/1/04 | 50,000 | 51,286 | |||||||
Westlake, OH, 4.85%, 12/1/03 | 100,000 | 100,493 | |||||||
Total School District 18.7% | $ | 1,005,354 | |||||||
State Agency Building Authority | |||||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Administration Building Fund, 6.40%, 10/1/01 | 50,000 | 51,108 | |||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Adult Correctional-Series A, 5.50%, 10/01/10 | 100,000 | 103,510 | |||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Juvenile Correction Facilities, 4.375%, 10/1/12 | 100,000 | 90,480 | |||||||
Ohio State Building Authority, Ohio Center For The Arts, 5.45%, 10/1/07 | 100,000 | 103,245 | |||||||
Total State Agency Building Authority 6.5% | $ | 348,343 | |||||||
State Agency Education | |||||||||
Ohio State Elementary and Secondary Education, (FSA Insured), 5.0%, 12/1/07 | 100,000 | 100,362 | |||||||
Ohio State Higher Education Facilities, 5.90%, 12/1/05 | 50,000 | 51,643 | |||||||
Ohio State Public Facilities Commission, (MBIA Insured), 4.70%, 06/1/11 | 100,000 | 95,068 | |||||||
Total State Agency Education 4.6% | $ | 247,073 | |||||||
Total Fixed Income Municipal Bonds 98.7% | $ | 5,298,186 | |||||||
(Municipal Bonds Identified Cost $5,361,908) | |||||||||
Cash Equivalents | |||||||||
Federated Ohio Municipal Cash Trust | 69,455 | ||||||||
Total Cash Equivalents 1.3% | $ | 69,455 | |||||||
(Cash Identified Cost $69,455) | |||||||||
Total Portfolio Value 100.0% | $ | 5,367,641 | |||||||
(Total Portfolio Identified Cost $5,431,363) | |||||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities | $ | 42,311 | |||||||
Total Net Assets | $ | 5,409,952 |
15
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
Stock Funds | Bond Funds | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed | Municipal | |||||||||||||||||||||
Growth | Opportunity | Realty | Income | Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Securities at Market Value* | $ | 63,546,861 | $ | 74,317,038 | $ | 7,381,794 | $ | 29,658,603 | $ | 5,367,641 | ||||||||||||
Dividends and Interest Receivable | $ | 51,887 | $ | 55,243 | $ | 54,447 | $ | 494,033 | $ | 45,204 | ||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 63,598,748 | $ | 74,372,281 | $ | 7,436,241 | $ | 30,152,636 | $ | 5,412,845 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued Management Fees | $ | 49,870 | $ | 57,441 | $ | 5,824 | $ | 21,009 | $ | 2,893 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 49,870 | $ | 57,441 | $ | 5,824 | $ | 21,009 | $ | 2,893 | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 63,548,878 | $ | 74,314,840 | $ | 7,430,417 | $ | 30,131,627 | $ | 5,409,952 | ||||||||||||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid in Capital (see footnote #9) | $ | 42,693,364 | $ | 47,982,916 | $ | 8,238,849 | $ | 31,814,631 | $ | 5,467,370 | ||||||||||||
Undistributed Net Investment Income | $ | 21,270 | $ | (50,953 | ) | $ | 29,994 | $ | 22,981 | $ | 6,304 | |||||||||||
Undistributed Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Security Transactions | $ | 1,144,617 | $ | 4,475,933 | $ | (400,024 | ) | $ | (566,016 | ) | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | $ | 19,689,627 | $ | 21,906,944 | $ | (438,402 | ) | $ | (1,139,969 | ) | $ | (63,722 | ) | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 63,548,878 | $ | 74,314,840 | $ | 7,430,417 | $ | 30,131,627 | $ | 5,409,952 | ||||||||||||
Shares Outstanding | 1,919,341 | 2,038,890 | 622,758 | 2,034,196 | 353,937 | |||||||||||||||||
Offering, Redemption and Net Asset Value Per Share | $ | 33.11 | $ | 36.45 | $ | 11.93 | $ | 14.81 | $ | 15.29 | ||||||||||||
*Identified Cost of Securities | $ | 43,857,234 | $ | 52,410,094 | $ | 7,820,196 | $ | 30,798,572 | $ | 5,431,363 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
16
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
Stock Funds | Bond Funds | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed | Municipal | |||||||||||||||||||||
Growth | Opportunity | Realty | Income | Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment Income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 67,271 | $ | 110,755 | $ | 11,676 | $ | 996,935 | $ | 132,540 | ||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 251,164 | $ | 161,742 | $ | 208,345 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total Investment Income | $ | 318,435 | $ | 272,497 | $ | 220,021 | $ | 996,935 | $ | 132,540 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Management Fee | $ | 312,804 | $ | 340,474 | $ | 32,739 | $ | 149,300 | $ | 26,568 | ||||||||||||
Management Fee Waiver (See accompanying note #3) | $ | (15,640 | ) | $ | (17,024 | ) | $ | (1,637 | ) | $ | (22,395 | ) | $ | (9,299 | ) | |||||||
Total Expenses | $ | 297,164 | $ | 323,450 | $ | 31,102 | $ | 126,905 | $ | 17,269 | ||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 21,271 | $ | (50,953 | ) | $ | 188,919 | $ | 870,030 | $ | 115,271 | |||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses): | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Security Transactions | $ | 1,144,615 | $ | 4,475,932 | $ | (128,022 | ) | $ | (566,018 | ) | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | $ | (2,521,293 | ) | $ | 1,647,764 | $ | 827,022 | $ | 308,153 | $ | 31,592 | |||||||||||
Net Gain (Loss) on Investments | $ | (1,376,678 | ) | $ | 6,123,696 | $ | 699,000 | $ | (257,865 | ) | $ | 31,592 | ||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Assets from Operations | $ | (1,355,407 | ) | $ | 6,072,743 | $ | 887,919 | $ | 612,165 | $ | 146,863 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
17
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
Stock Funds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Growth Fund | Opportunity Fund | Realty Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period Ended | Year Ended | Period Ended | Year Ended | Period Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | 6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | 6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 21,270 | $ | 40,190 | $ | (50,953 | ) | $ | (44,491 | ) | $ | 188,919 | * | $ | 274,739 | |||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Security Transactions | $ | 1,144,615 | $ | 1,071,337 | $ | 4,475,932 | $ | 2,888,171 | $ | (128,022 | ) | $ | (232,203 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | $ | (2,521,293 | ) | $ | 5,126,367 | $ | 1,647,764 | $ | 4,152,996 | $ | 827,022 | $ | (184,150 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Assets from Operations | $ | (1,355,408 | ) | $ | 6,237,894 | $ | 6,072,743 | $ | 6,996,676 | $ | 887,919 | $ | (141,614 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0 | $ | (40,539 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | (158,932 | ) | $ | (274,737 | ) | |||||||||||
Net Realized Gain from Security Transactions | $ | 0 | $ | (1,071,330 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (2,888,176 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Net Return of Capital | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Net (Decrease) in Assets from Distributions | $ | 0 | $ | (1,111,869 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (2,888,176 | ) | $ | (158,932 | ) | $ | (274,737 | ) | ||||||||||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds From Sale of Shares | $ | 10,199,168 | $ | 12,285,288 | $ | 8,876,939 | $ | 11,278,789 | $ | 1,247,120 | $ | 1,654,737 | ||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value of Shares Issued on Reinvestment of Distributions | $ | 0 | $ | 1,006,436 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,801,257 | $ | 31,100 | $ | 51,211 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of Shares Redeemed | $ | (7,313,799 | ) | $ | (4,786,653 | ) | $ | (3,410,237 | ) | $ | (3,625,807 | ) | $ | (436,127 | ) | $ | (487,761 | ) | ||||||||
Net Increase in Assets from Capital Share Transactions | $ | 2,885,369 | $ | 8,505,071 | $ | 5,466,702 | $ | 10,454,239 | $ | 842,093 | $ | 1,218,187 | ||||||||||||||
Net Change in Net Assets | $ | 1,529,961 | $ | 13,631,096 | $ | 11,539,445 | $ | 14,562,739 | $ | 1,571,080 | $ | 801,836 | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets at Beginning of Period | $ | 62,018,917 | $ | 48,387,821 | $ | 62,775,395 | $ | 48,212,656 | $ | 5,859,337 | $ | 5,057,501 | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets at End of Period | $ | 63,548,878 | $ | 62,018,917 | $ | 74,314,840 | $ | 62,775,395 | $ | 7,430,417 | $ | 5,859,337 |
*Net Investment Income on the Realty Fund includes Estimated Return of Capital.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
18
JOHNSON MUTUAL FUNDS | June 30, 2000 Unaudited |
Bond Funds | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | Municipal Income Fund | |||||||||||||||||
Period Ended | Year Ended | Period Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | 6/30/00 | 12/31/99 | |||||||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 870,030 | $ | 1,495,577 | $ | 115,271 | $ | 178,797 | ||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Security Transactions | $ | (566,018 | ) | $ | 39,278 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,253 | |||||||||
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | $ | 308,153 | $ | (2,522,908 | ) | $ | 31,592 | $ | (239,989 | ) | ||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Assets from Operations | $ | 612,165 | $ | (988,053 | ) | $ | 146,863 | $ | (57,939 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | (847,049 | ) | $ | (1,495,596 | ) | $ | (108,967 | ) | $ | (178,804 | ) | ||||||
Net Realized Gain from Security Transactions | $ | 0 | $ | (39,265 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (3,254 | ) | ||||||||
Net (Decrease) in Assets from Distributions | $ | (847,049 | ) | $ | (1,534,861 | ) | $ | (108,967 | ) | $ | (182,058 | ) | ||||||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds From Sale of Shares | $ | 5,554,445 | $ | 12,474,498 | $ | 755,527 | $ | 2,148,289 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value of Shares Issued on Reinvestment of Dividends/ Gains | $ | 436,548 | $ | 886,212 | $ | 24,104 | $ | 44,667 | ||||||||||
Cost of Shares Redeemed | $ | (5,995,604 | ) | $ | (4,457,580 | ) | $ | (555,099 | ) | $ | (735,309 | ) | ||||||
Net Increase in Assets from Capital Share Transactions | $ | (4,611 | ) | $ | 8,903,130 | $ | 224,532 | $ | 1,457,647 | |||||||||
Net Change in Net Assets | $ | (239,495 | ) | $ | 6,380,216 | $ | 262,428 | $ | 1,217,650 | |||||||||
Net Assets at Beginning of Period | $ | 30,371,122 | $ | 23,990,906 | $ | 5,147,524 | $ | 3,929,874 | ||||||||||
Net Assets at End of Period | $ | 30,131,627 | $ | 30,371,122 | $ | 5,409,952 | $ | 5,147,524 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
19
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | GROWTH FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Growth Fund:
Unaudited | Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/1/00 to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Beginning of Period | $ | 33.86 | $ | 30.98 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 21.16 | $ | 18.86 | $ | 14.82 | |||||||||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.24 | |||||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities (Realized & Unrealized) | $ | (0.76 | ) | $ | 3.48 | $ | 7.32 | $ | 7.01 | $ | 2.98 | $ | 4.41 | ||||||||||||
Total Operations | $ | (0.75 | ) | $ | 3.50 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 7.17 | $ | 3.17 | $ | 4.65 | ||||||||||||
Distributions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions from Net Realized Capital Gains | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (1.72 | ) | $ | (2.79 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) | $ | (0.37 | ) | ||||||||
Total Distributions | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (1.77 | ) | $ | (2.95 | ) | $ | (0.87 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value End of Period | $ | 33.11 | $ | 33.86 | $ | 30.98 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 21.16 | $ | 18.86 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | -2.22 | % | 11.31 | % | 29.10 | % | 33.96 | % | 16.85 | % | 31.61 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $ | 63.55 | $ | 62.02 | $ | 48.39 | $ | 31.90 | $ | 21.42 | $ | 14.87 | |||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (2) | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to Average Net Assets (2) | 0.07 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.99 | % | 1.42 | % | |||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 16.24 | % | 29.84 | % | 39.71 | % | 54.44 | % | 26.78 | % | 52.91 | % |
(1) | The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Growth Fund from 1.30% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.95%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 6/30/00, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Growth Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 0.02%. (See note #3) |
(2) | Ratios annualized in 2000. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
20
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | OPPORTUNITY FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Opportunity Fund:
Unaudited | Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/1/00 to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Beginning of Period | $ | 33.40 | $ | 31.10 | $ | 26.44 | $ | 22.65 | $ | 19.42 | $ | 15.70 | |||||||||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities (Realized & Unrealized) | $ | 3.08 | $ | 3.94 | $ | 5.02 | $ | 6.13 | $ | 4.43 | $ | 3.89 | |||||||||||||
Total Operations | $ | 3.05 | $ | 3.92 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 6.16 | $ | 4.49 | $ | 3.97 | |||||||||||||
Distributions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||
Distributions from Net Realized Capital Gains | $ | 0.00 | $ | (1.62 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | (2.34 | ) | $ | (1.20 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | ||||||||
Total Distributions | $ | 0.00 | $ | (1.62 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | (2.37 | ) | $ | (1.26 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value End of Period | $ | 36.45 | $ | 33.40 | $ | 31.10 | $ | 26.44 | $ | 22.65 | $ | 19.42 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | 9.13 | % | 12.65 | % | 18.93 | % | 27.26 | % | 23.10 | % | 25.27 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $ | 74.31 | $ | 62.78 | $ | 48.21 | $ | 35.06 | $ | 22.09 | $ | 15.19 | |||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (2) | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to Average Net Assets (2) | (0.15 | %) | (0.08 | %) | (0.06 | %) | 0.11 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.59 | % | |||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 17.22 | % | 40.71 | % | 41.46 | % | 55.05 | % | 46.43 | % | 62.15 | % |
(1) | The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Opportunity Fund from 1.30% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.95%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 6/30/00, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Opportunity Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: (0.20%). (See note #3) |
(2) | Ratios annualized in 2000. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
21
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | REALTY FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Realty Fund:
Year Ended December | |||||||||||||
Unaudited | 31 | ||||||||||||
1/1/00 to | |||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 1999 | 1998 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value Beginning of Period | $ | 10.72 | $ | 11.54 | $ | 15.00 | |||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.61 | |||||||
Net Return of Capital | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.12 | |||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities (Realized and Unrealized) | $ | 1.17 | $ | (0.93 | ) | $ | (3.46 | ) | |||||
Total Operations | $ | 1.47 | $ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (2.73 | ) | |||||
Distributions: | |||||||||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||
Distributions from Return of Capital | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.12 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from Net realized Capital Gains | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | |||||||
Total Distributions | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.73 | ) | ||||
Net Asset Value End of Period | $ | 11.93 | $ | 10.72 | $ | 11.54 | |||||||
Total Return | 13.80 | % | (2.47 | %) | (18.56 | %) | |||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $ | 7.43 | $ | 5.86 | $ | 5.10 | |||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | |||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (2) | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.48 | % | |||||||
Ratio of Net Income to Average Net Assets (2) | 5.76 | % | 4.93 | % | 5.17 | % | |||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 0.95 | % | 11.21 | % | 12.07 | % |
(1) | The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Realty Fund from 1.30% to 1.00%. The Adviser waived the management fee in entirety for the period 1/1/98-6/30/98. The Adviser waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.95% for the period 7/1/98-12/31/98, and through 1999. The Adviser intends the final fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 6/30/00, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Realty Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 5.71%. (See note #3) |
(2) | Ratios annualized in 2000. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
22
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | FIXED INCOME FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Fixed Income Fund:
Unaudited | Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/1/00 to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Beginning of Period | $ | 14.93 | $ | 16.36 | $ | 15.84 | $ | 15.45 | $ | 15.84 | $ | 14.20 | |||||||||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.83 | |||||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities (Realized & Unrealized) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (1.41 | ) | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.39 | $ | (0.39 | ) | $ | 1.64 | ||||||||||
Total Operations | $ | 0.30 | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | 1.41 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 2.47 | ||||||||||||
Distributions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.81 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | $ | (0.83 | ) | |||||||
Distributions from Net Realized Capital Gains | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | |||||||||||
Total Distributions | $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.83 | ) | $ | (0.89 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | $ | (0.83 | ) | |||||||
Net Asset Value End of Period | $ | 14.81 | $ | 14.93 | $ | 16.36 | $ | 15.84 | $ | 15.45 | $ | 15.84 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | 2.02 | % | (3.68 | %) | 9.05 | % | 8.44 | % | 3.11 | % | 17.70 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $ | 30.13 | $ | 30.37 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 18.87 | $ | 16.14 | $ | 15.97 | |||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (2) | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.85 | % | |||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to Average Net Assets (2) | 5.78 | % | 5.45 | % | 5.40 | % | 5.67 | % | 5.56 | % | 5.54 | % | |||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15.44 | % | 13.66 | % | 24.89 | % | 29.33 | % | 14.04 | % | 4.95 | % |
(1) | The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Fixed Income Fund from 1.15% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.85%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 6/30/00, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Fixed Income Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 5.63%. (See note #3) |
(2) | Ratios annualized in 2000. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
23
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Selected Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period for the Municipal Income Fund:
Unaudited | Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/1/00 to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/00 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value Beginning of Period | $ | 15.18 | $ | 15.99 | $ | 15.88 | $ | 15.57 | $ | 15.68 | $ | 14.73 | |||||||||||||
Operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.63 | |||||||||||||
Net Gains (Losses) on Securities (Realized & Unrealized) | $ | 0.09 | $ | (0.80 | ) | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.96 | |||||||||||
Total Operations | $ | 0.42 | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||||||
Distributions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income (1) | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (0.64 | ) | $ | (0.64 | ) | $ | (0.63 | ) | $ | (0.63 | ) | |||||||
Distributions from Net Realized Capital Gains | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||
Total Distributions | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.65 | ) | $ | (0.63 | ) | $ | (0.64 | ) | |||||||
Net Asset Value End of Period | $ | 15.29 | $ | 15.18 | $ | 15.99 | $ | 15.88 | $ | 15.57 | $ | 15.68 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | 2.78 | % | (1.24 | %) | 5.19 | % | 6.23 | % | 3.43 | % | 10.88 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $ | 5.41 | $ | 5.15 | $ | 3.93 | $ | 3.90 | $ | 2.81 | $ | 2.28 | |||||||||||||
Ratios after Fee Waivers: (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (3) | 0.65 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.68 | % | |||||||||||||
Ratio of Net Income to Average Net Assets (3) | 4.33 | % | 4.03 | % | 4.01 | % | 4.19 | % | 4.18 | % | 4.28 | % | |||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 0.00 | % | 8.44 | % | 20.70 | % | 9.95 | % | 6.25 | % | 7.81 | % |
(1) | All distributions are Federally tax exempt. |
(2) | The Adviser amended the management agreement on 11/18/98 to reduce the maximum management fee on the Municipal Income Fund from 1.15% to 1.00%. The Adviser further waived the maximum management fee to sustain a fee of 0.65%. The Adviser intends this fee waiver to be permanent, although the Adviser retains the right to remove the waiver after April 30, 2003. As of 6/30/00, assuming no waiver of management fee expenses, the Municipal income Fund ratios would have been: Expenses to Average Net Assets: 1.00% and Net Income to Average Net Assets: 3.98%. (See note #3) |
(3) | Ratios annualized in 2000 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
24
1) Organization:
The Growth Fund, Fixed Income Fund, Opportunity Fund, Municipal Income Fund, and the Realty Fund are each series of the Johnson Mutual Funds Trust, and are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as no-load, open-end investment companies. The Johnson Mutual Funds Trust was established as an Ohio business trust under Declaration of Trust dated September 30, 1992. The Growth and Fixed Income Funds began offering their shares publicly on January 4, 1993. The Opportunity and Municipal Income Funds began offering their shares publicly on May 16, 1994. The Realty Fund began offering its shares publicly on January 2, 1998.
The investment objective of the Growth Fund is long term capital growth. The investment objective of the Opportunity Fund is long term capital growth. The investment objective of the Fixed Income Fund is a high level of income over the long term consistent with preservation of capital. The investment objective of the Municipal Income Fund is a high level of federally tax-free income over the long term consistent with preservation of capital. The investment objective of the Realty Fund is above average income and long term capital growth. The Realty Fund invest primarily in real estate related equity securities.
2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Security Valuation and Transactions:
The investments in securities are carried at market value. The market quotation used for common stocks which are traded on any exchange or on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market are valued at the last quoted sale price of the day, determined as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. In absence of a sale price, a security is valued at its last bid price except when, in the Advisers opinion, the last bid price does not accurately reflect the current value of the security.
Fixed income securities are valued by using independent pricing services which use prices provided by market makers or estimates of market values obtained from yield data relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics. When prices are not readily available from a pricing service, or when illiquid securities are being valued, securities are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Adviser, subject to review of the Board of Trustees. Short-term investments in fixed income securities with maturities of less than 60 days are valued by using the amortized cost method of valuation. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade date basis. Discounts and premiums on securities purchased are amortized over the life of the respective securities.
Investment Income and Realized Capital Gains and Losses on Investment Securities:
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Dividend and interest income are recorded net of foreign taxes. Gains and losses on sales of investments are calculated using the specific identification method.
Income Taxes:
It is the Funds policy to distribute annually, prior to the end of the calendar year, dividends sufficient to satisfy excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Service. This Internal Revenue Service requirement may cause an excess of distributions over the book year-end accumulated income. In addition, it is the Funds policy to distribute annually, after the end of the calendar year, any remaining net investment income and net realized capital gains to comply with the special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code available to registered investment companies. Accordingly, no tax provision is required.
3) Investment Advisory Agreement:
The investment advisory agreement provides that Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc. (the Adviser) will pay all of the Funds operating expenses, excluding brokerage fees and commissions, taxes, interest and extraordinary expenses. The Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund and Realty Fund paid the Adviser a management fee at the annual rate of 0.95% of each Funds average daily net assets, which was accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fixed Income Fund paid the Adviser a management fee at the annual rate of 0.85% of the Funds average daily net assets, and the Municipal Income Fund paid the Adviser a management fee at the annual rate of 0.65% of the Funds average daily net assets, both of which are accrued daily and paid monthly.
25
The Adviser received management fees for the period January 1 June 30, 2000 as indicated below. These fees are after the Adviser waived part of the management fees on each of the funds from the maximum of 1.00% to the effective fee ratios listed below. The Adviser intends the fee waivers to be permanent, although the Adviser has the right to remove these fee waivers any time after April 30, 2003.
Effective | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fee | Fee | Fee | Management | |||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fee | Waiver | Ratio | Waiver | Fee | |||||||||||||||
Growth Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.95 | % | $ | (15,640 | ) | $ | 297,164 | |||||||||
Opportunity Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.95 | % | $ | (17,024 | ) | $ | 323,450 | |||||||||
Realty Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.95 | % | $ | (1,637 | ) | $ | 31,102 | |||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.85 | % | $ | (22,395 | ) | $ | 126,905 | |||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | 1.00 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.65 | % | $ | (9,299 | ) | $ | 17,269 |
4) Related Party Transactions:
All officers and one trustee of the Johnson Mutual Funds Trust are employees of Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc., the Adviser. There are three independent Trustees. Each of the three independent Trustees received compensation during the 6 months ending June 30, 2000 of $2,500 for his responsibilities as trustee and has received no additional compensation from the Trust. Total Compensation for the Trustees, as a group was $7,500 for the period and as a group they received no additional compensation from the Trust.
The Adviser is not a registered broker-dealer of securities and thus does not receive commissions on trades made on behalf of the Funds. The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a Fund creates a presumption of control of the Fund, under Section 2(a)(9) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. As of June 30, 2000, Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc. and entities which the Adviser could be deemed to control or have discretion over owned in aggregate more than 25% of the Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Realty Fund, Fixed Income Fund, and the Municipal Income Fund.
Johnson Financial, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc., the Adviser. Johnson Financial, Inc. provides transfer agency, fund accounting, and administration services to the Funds. These services are paid for by the Adviser.
5) Purchases and Sales of Securities:
During the 6 months ended June 30, 2000, purchases and sales of investment securities aggregated:
Investment Securities Other Than | ||||||||||||||||
Short Term Investments and | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | U.S. Government Obligations | |||||||||||||||
Fund | Purchases | Sales | Purchases | Sales | ||||||||||||
Growth Fund | $ | 13,054,829 | $ | 10,247,029 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Opportunity Fund | $ | 17,030,451 | $ | 11,837,498 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Realty Fund | $ | 923,618 | $ | 61,367 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Fixed Income Fund | $ | 5,219,706 | $ | 4,389,497 | $ | 0 | $ | 202,891 | ||||||||
Municipal Income Fund | $ | 559,787 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
6) Capital Share Transactions:
As of June 30, 2000, there were an unlimited number of capital shares of no par value authorized. Each Fund records purchases of its capital shares at the daily net asset value next determined after receipt of a shareholders check or wire and application in proper form. Redemptions are recorded at the net asset value next determined following receipt of a shareholders written or telephone request in proper form.
26
Capital Share Transactions for the Period January 1 June 30, 2000:
Fixed | Municipal | |||||||||||||||||||
Growth | Opportunity | Realty | Income | Income | ||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Sold to Investors | 309,374 | 260,748 | 113,316 | 373,260 | 49,686 | |||||||||||||||
Shares Issued on Reinvestment Dividends | 0 | 0 | 2,682 | 29,420 | 1,579 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 309,374 | 260,748 | 115,998 | 402,680 | 51,265 | |||||||||||||||
Shares Redeemed | (221,463 | ) | (101,294 | ) | (40,039 | ) | (403,024 | ) | (36,498 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Increase/ Decrease During Period | 87,911 | 159,454 | 75,959 | (344 | ) | 14,767 | ||||||||||||||
Shares Outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 1999 (Beginning of Period) | 1,831,430 | 1,879,436 | 546,799 | 2,034,540 | 339,170 | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2000 (End of Period) | 1,919,341 | 2,038,890 | 622,758 | 2,034,196 | 353,937 |
7) Security Transactions:
For Federal income tax purposes, the cost of investments owned on June 30, 2000 was the same as identified cost. As of June 30, 2000 the composition of unrealized appreciation (the excess of value over tax cost) and depreciation (the excess of tax cost over value) was as follows:
Net | ||||||||||||
Appreciation | ||||||||||||
Fund | Appreciation | (Depreciation) | (Depreciation) | |||||||||
Growth Fund | $ | 23,765,826 | $ | (4,076,199 | ) | $ | 19,689,627 | |||||
Opportunity Fund | $ | 27,319,899 | $ | (5,412,955 | ) | $ | 21,906,944 | |||||
Realty Fund | $ | 390,883 | $ | (829,285 | ) | $ | (438,402 | ) | ||||
Fixed Income Fund | $ | 74,618 | $ | (1,214,587 | ) | $ | (1,139,969 | ) | ||||
Municipal Income Fund | $ | 30,487 | $ | (94,209 | ) | $ | (63,722 | ) |
8) Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
9) Net Investment Income and Net Realized Capital Losses Realty Fund:
The net investment income on the Realty Fund includes estimated return of capital as of June 30, 2000.
As of June 30, 2000, the Realty Fund had accumulated net realized capital loss carryovers of $(99,788) expiring in 2006 and $(232,203) expiring in 2007. To the extent that the Realty Fund realizes future net capital gains, those gains will be offset by any unused capital loss carryovers.
27
Trustees and Officers
Timothy E. Johnson | Trustee, President | |
John W. Craig | Independent Trustee | |
Ronald H. McSwain | Independent Trustee | |
Kenneth S. Shull | Independent Trustee | |
Dale H. Coates | Vice President | |
Richard T. Miller | Vice President | |
Dianna J. Rosenberger | CFO, Treasurer | |
David C. Tedford | Secretary |
Transfer Agent and Fund Accountant
Custodian
Auditors
Legal Counsel
This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when accompanied or preceded
Investment Company Act #811-7254
|