GARDNER LEWIS INVESTMENT TRUST
N-30D, 1998-10-21
Previous: FRESH CHOICE INC, 10-Q, 1998-10-21
Next: DANKA BUSINESS SYSTEMS PLC, 8-K, 1998-10-21




            _______________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
            _______________________________________________________


                                                  October 1, 1998




Dear Shareholder:

         The Chesapeake Growth Fund Institutional Class closed the third quarter
with a loss of 22.3%. This loss compares to losses of 9.9%, 22.7%, and 20.1% for
the S&P 500, Nasdaq Industrials,  and Russell 2000, respectively,  and leaves us
down 12.3% year-to-date. Negative news revolving around everything from Japanese
and Russian economic turmoil to the White House scandal has heightened  investor
nervousness,  and in  turn,  market  volatility.  As if these  problems  are not
enough,  the  bankruptcy  of several  hedge  funds and the  well-publicized  Fed
orchestrated  bailout  of Long  Term  Capital  Management  have  further  fueled
anxiety.

         The market's sell-off has been both broad and steep, our portfolio's to
a  greater  degree.  We are  disappointed  with  our  relative  performance  and
attribute it primarily to three things. Most importantly,  we underestimated the
impact that global  concerns  would have on investor  sentiment as it relates to
U.S. retail.  In addition,  the recent  disruption of capital markets created an
inability  for a number of our  companies  to raise  the  funds  needed to fully
execute their aggressive growth plans. Finally, we miscalculated the risk to the
healthcare industry's ability to profit under the government's new reimbursement
plan.

         Most  of the  damage  to  the  market  was  done  in  August,  and  the
preponderance  to smaller  stocks.  The  Russell  2000 was off over 30% from its
April high as compared to the S&P 500 which was off less than 20% from its high.
We  attribute  this  difference  to a lack of trading  liquidity in the smallest
names as price  insensitive  selling ran into buyers reluctant to commit capital
in this  volatile  tape.  At the end of  August,  almost 20% of the names in the
Russell 2000 were down 60% or more from their  highs,  almost half were down 40%
or more, and 75% were down more than 25%. Selling was truly universal in smaller
stocks.

         Macroeconomic  concerns  acted as fuel for this  sell-off as  investors
attempted to project  implications of an uncertain  global economic  environment
against a benign domestic  environment.  Interest rates are low and falling, and
inflation  remains  dormant with  commodity  prices  hitting new lows.  Balanced
against this are the possible  implications of global weakness to U.S. corporate
profits.  Nervousness  about what might happen has driven  investors'  decisions
over the past weeks more than any measurable or real change in the macroeconomic
state.  Problems  in  Russia  illustrate  this  important  distinction.   Though
virtually insignificant as a part of the global economy, with trade representing
less  than 1% of U.S.  gross  domestic  product,  Russian  turmoil  provided  an
emotional  catalyst  that sparked a change in investor  psychology.  Problems in
Asia have far more  fundamental  weight,  and  perhaps it was a lack of positive
change in that region that heightened  investor  nervousness.  The point is that
current  nervousness  is about  what  could  happen,  not what did happen in the
business environment.
<PAGE>


         Since the  beginning of August,  we have logged more than 1500 contacts
with our investment companies, their customers,  competitors and suppliers in an
effort to  quantify  true  business  prospects,  rather than  conjectured  ones.
Further, we have been diligent in our attempts to quantify risks associated with
the most  negative  of  global  macroeconomic  scenarios  as they  relate to our
investment companies.  Our companies are smaller,  less globally oriented,  more
proprietary in their  businesses,  and have earnings that are far less sensitive
to  macroeconomic  change than the typical  larger  company.  In the universe of
giant  multinationals,  selling has been based on the  reasonable  concern  that
future corporate profits may not be able to justify current  valuations.  In the
smaller company universe, selling has been far less fundamentally based.

         We believe a number of developments can turn current market  sentiment.
From a macroeconomic perspective they are a credible reform package for Japan, a
clear direction for the resolution of the White House scandal,  the abatement of
tax related selling which is now severe in small and mid-sized stocks,  and to a
lesser  degree  further  action  on the  part  of the  Federal  Reserve.  From a
microeconomic perspective, it is company earnings. What is important here is not
a complete  resolution  to these  issues,  but a belief on the part of investors
that things will begin to improve.

         This  point  is most  clearly  evidenced  when  studying  the  market's
activity  surrounding  the  Persian  Gulf War.  The best time to invest  was not
January 17th,  the day U.S.  planes began to bomb,  but instead in the middle of
October when the Press was exaggerating the strength of the Republican Guard. In
our  case,  we  would  have  missed  a  portfolio  rally  of 30% had we  waited.
Fortunately,  our discipline precludes us from so doing. And,  ironically,  many
investors  even  missed the late  winter  move  because  they  wanted a complete
resolution to the war before  committing  funds.  By the time the war had ended,
our portfolio  return had further  accelerated  far surpassing its initial gain,
and the S&P 500 had  appreciated 21% from its low. The point is that markets are
anticipatory, thus it is direction that moves them. Conclusion is too late.

         From our  perspective,  the  macroeconomic  issues are being addressed,
with the  Japanese  situation  being the most  tenuous.  Thus,  we believe  that
earnings  should  finally  begin to command an  increasingly  larger  portion of
investor  attention.  In fact,  this  may  already  be  happening.  With  recent
pre-announcements by some of this market's seemingly bulletproof companies, like
Coca-Cola,  Gillette, and Disney, we have seen commensurate compression in their
stock prices.  This makes fundamental sense,  because it is these companies that
rely heavily on foreign sales or traffic for their continued growth.

         Why these price  corrections did not take place sooner is probably more
related to psychology  than anything  else.  Last winter,  as market  volatility
increased over Asian economic concerns, investors sought safe-haven in household
names;  but,  now  that  the  effects  of Asia and the  other  economies  it has
contaminated  are being  felt,  investors  are in a  position  to see its actual
impact and can therefore  adjust their  portfolios  accordingly.  This is why we
long ago concluded  that earnings and valuation are critical and why they should
once again assume their role of historic importance.

         Despite the market's  recent  correction,  larger  companies  are still
trading at price-earnings  multiples that are historically somewhat high, though
some would argue  justifiably  so, given the interest rate  environment.  On the
other hand, in the same interest rate environment, smaller companies are trading
at historically low multiples and at unprecedented  multiples relative to larger
ones.  We have  found  price-earnings  multiples  as low as those now in smaller
stocks in only a handful of modern  periods.  During the  mini-crash  of October
1997,  multiples were not this low; during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait,  multiples
bottomed  at these  levels;  during the crash of 1987,  they  bottomed  at these
levels;  and, through the mid-seventies  bear market,  they reached levels lower
than these, though with much higher interest rates and inflation.
<PAGE>


         In previous periods of great market turmoil,  we have found some of our
best  opportunities as bottoms up fundamental  stockpickers.  It typically takes
some  time for the dust to settle  and the  market  to sort  through  companies'
fundamental prospects in order to differentiate those that sold off for rational
reasons from those that were simply  caught in the  downdraft.  Some of our best
results  in the past  have  been  derived  coming  out of these  types of market
environments.  We feel that our investment  discipline puts us one step ahead of
most market participants in these rebuilding phases, and are busy evaluating the
opportunities currently presented.

Sincerely,



W. Whitfield Gardner                            John L. Lewis, IV
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                               Portfolio Spotlight          September 30, 1998

         Because recent market  activity has been centered around macro economic
events, most of our portfolio's short-term performance can be explained by them.
Nevertheless,  there have been two  significant  longer-term  investment  trends
whose  participating  companies  you  may  have  noticed  under-weighted  in our
portfolio.  The first and most  influential  has been the benefit of a declining
interest  rate  environment  on a  consolidating  financial  services  industry.
Greater  involvement  in financial  services  would have helped our  performance
dramatically  over the past  couple of years,  as it did the indices to which we
compare.  The second trend has been the speculation  surrounding the development
of  the  internet.  Internet  related  companies,  although  not  a  significant
weighting in any benchmark, have garnered a great deal of investor attention and
significantly  benefited  those exposed to them. We thought it important that we
address both trends.

         Until  recently,  as interest rates  declined,  interest rate sensitive
instruments including equities like banks, utilities, and real estate investment
trusts benefited tremendously.  Additionally,  these companies wanting some form
of earnings  growth,  and fueled by higher stock prices,  initiated  acquisition
strategies that further elevated prices in the group. Where we could participate
by investing in companies with more estimable  profits,  we did. But, given that
the businesses of many of these  companies  were highly  susceptible to interest
rate  fluctuations  and had  unacceptably  low growth rates,  we passed over the
majority.  The net result of this  interest rate movement was that the financial
services  sector  accounted for more than half of the performance of the Russell
2000 and one third of that of the Russell  Midcap,  from the  beginning  of 1996
until quarter end. Most dramatic was that smaller bank stocks had five times the
average   return  of  the  Russell  2000.   During  this  period,   we  averaged
significantly  less  exposure to the financial  services  group than the Russell
indices.  We continue to feel strongly that the  managements of the companies we
invest in should have more control over their companies' earnings prospects, and
that  relying on an  interest  rate  decline,  or a  takeover,  for stock  price
appreciation violates one of the major tenants of our investment discipline.  We
will  continue to invest in the growing  number of financial  institutions  that
have taken steps to insulate  themselves from interest rate risk, allowing their
managements better control of profit generation.

         As to the  internet,  we,  like  others,  believe  it will be a  viable
vehicle  for  commerce  and where  practical  are  participating  in its growth.
Unfortunately,  the  general  excitement  surrounding  it has caused many of its
related  companies'  stock prices to come public and then trade at  astronomical
valuations. Most of these companies are yet to produce a profit and will not for
some time. Thus, evaluating their worth is very difficult.  Tangentially,  cable
stocks have been beneficiaries of this internet boom, but they too carry much of
their current valuation for speculative reasons, such as assumed  consolidation,
rather than  measurable  ones, like strong profit growth.  For this reason,  the
only viable approach within our discipline has been to participate through those
companies  helping to build the equipment that makes the internet work and whose
sales and profits are estimable.  Nevertheless, it has been the concept-oriented
companies that have been the strongest performers.

         We have seen this pattern repeated  before,  where the concept precedes
the reality. For instance,  this is the second run for the cable companies whose
fortunes had reversed  approximately a decade ago when investors panicked out of
their  stocks as they came to  realize  that  fundamentals  were far  behind the
excitement.  And just a few years  ago this  same  phenomenon  was  repeated  in
cellular stocks when investors grew to understand that remote mountain locations
did not have the  population  to support  operators'  aggressive  infrastructure
builds. These industries make it, but few in the originally anticipated form. It
takes longer,  is more costly,  more  competitive,  and less  profitable than at
first thought.  Thus,  despite the ramp a number of the internet  related stocks
are now on, there will  ultimately be a day of reckoning when investors will ask
each company management, "What are you going to earn?". In the case of Netscape,
the original internet darling,  this has meant a stock price decline of 75%. Our
discipline is founded in fundamentals, because the market is grounded by them.
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                          Morningstar Ratings Revisited

         With 75% of all small-cap  growth mutual funds currently rated one-star
by  Morningstar,  we  thought it timely to  comment  on the  Morningstar  rating
process. To understand how one investment style can earn such a disproportionate
share of Morningstar's  lowest rating,  one needs to look at how the ratings are
calculated.

         Morningstar  ratings are based on risk  adjusted  performance  within a
broad asset class, e.g. U.S. equities,  U.S. fixed income.  Morningstar compares
each fund's monthly return results against  Treasury Bills and derives a measure
of risk (average  underperformance) and return (excess return). Monthly risk and
return  numbers  are  ranked  against  all other  funds in the  asset  class and
combined,  resulting in a risk adjusted relative performance ranking.  Stars are
assigned based on this relative  ranking.  For a domestic equity fund to receive
five stars, its risk adjusted  performance must be at the top of all U.S. equity
funds  that  Morningstar  tracks.  The point is that in U.S.  equity  funds,  no
distinction is made between  investment style categories like large-cap value or
small-cap growth.

         Over the past several years,  the large-cap growth sector of the market
has performed  tremendously  well,  with  relatively low levels of risk.  Stocks
outside of this universe have fared relatively poorly.  Consequently,  five-star
funds are heavily clustered in the large-cap growth category.  Conversely, fully
75% of Morningstar's  small-cap growth funds rate only one star when compared to
all other U.S. stock funds. Less than 10% of small-cap growth funds rate as high
as three stars, and none rate four stars or five stars.

         So  why  should  these  one-star  funds  be  a part  of  an  investment
portfolio?  Two reasons: future performance and risk diversification.

         There is ample  academic  evidence  that  the  past  performance  of an
investment  category is a poor predictor of its future  returns.  Yet 90% of all
new mutual fund money is invested in five-star and four-star funds whose returns
are based solely on their historical performance;  and currently,  most of these
funds are in the same category,  large-cap growth.  Thus, everyone is driving in
the same  direction,  but looking only in the  rear-view  mirror.  There is also
ample evidence that extraordinary performance of an investment category, good or
bad,  eventually  reverts  to its  average.  Thus,  now  more  than  usual,  the
historical  returns  of  these  currently  strong  performing  funds  may not be
indicative of their future returns.

         When one  considers the impact of star  dependence on  diversification,
the picture only gets worse. Diversification, combining different investments to
smooth out the bumps of their  individual  returns,  lowers average risk without
changing  average  returns.  But, there is no  diversification  if the different
investments all behave  similarly.  Owning several large-cap growth funds offers
limited  diversification benefit over owning one large-cap growth fund. However,
owning a large-cap fund, a small-cap fund, and an  international  fund can offer
more meaningful  diversification.  In today's environment,  with five-star funds
all  clustered in the U.S.  large-cap  growth  category,  a portfolio  comprised
solely of five-star  funds would be absent a significant  part of the investible
universe and thus forego important diversification opportunities.

         Successful  investors  remember  two things.  The first is to avoid the
trap of  piling  into  yesterday's  hot  investment  category  which  may not be
tomorrow's.  The second is to reap the rewards of  diversification  by combining
holdings that do not go up, or more importantly go down, for the same reasons.
<PAGE>

                     _____________________________________

                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
                     _____________________________________

                               September 30, 1998


Investment Strategy
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The  Chesapeake  Growth  Fund  seeks  capital  appreciation   primarily  through
investments in small, medium, and large growth equities.  The cornerstone of the
fund's intensive in-house  fundamental  analysis is in constant contact with the
management,  customers, competitors, and suppliers of both current and potential
investments.


Investment Guidelines
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fund seeks companies that:

  *  are  experiencing  a rapid  growth rate - companies  in our  portfolio  are
     forecasted to grow their profits in excess of 15% annually;

  *  are selling at a stock price not yet fully reflective of their growth rate;

  *  are undergoing  a positive  change created  by new  products,  managements,
     distribution strategies or manufacturing technologies;

  *  have a  strong  balance  sheet  and are less  susceptible to  macroeconomic
     change.


The Largest Industry Groups  [Represented by a Pie Chart in mailings]
- ----------------------------------

     Computers & Peripherals - 12.7%  
     Telecommunications - 9.4%
     Computer Software - 9.3%  
     Business Services - 9.1%  
     Energy Services - 6.9%
     Pharmaceuticals - 6.2% 
     Apparel - 6.0% 
     Healthcare Delivery - 5.3% 
     Retail Sales & Distribution - 5.1% 
     Bldg. Supplies/Housing Related - 4.2 %
     All Others - 25.6%  


About The Investment Advisor
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gardner Lewis Asset  management  serves as investment  advisor to the Chesapeake
Family of Funds.  Overall,  through the funds and separately  managed  accounts,
Gardner Lewis  invests  approximately  $2.6 billion in growth  equities for both
institutions and individuals including some of the top foundations,  endowments,
and pension  plans in the U.S.  Gardner  Lewis was founded in 1990 and employs a
staff of 29. The research team is comprised of 15.
<PAGE>

Ten Largest Holdings
- ----------------------------------------
1.  EMC Corporation                 5.6%
2.  MCI Worldco Inc.                4.2%
3.  Jones Apparel Group, Inc.       3.8%
4.  IMS Health Inc.                 3.5%
5.  Biomet, Inc.                    2.9%
6.  CalEnergy                       2.9%
7.  Sun Microsystems, Inc.          2.6%
8.  Mylan Laboratories              2.5%
9.  Federal-Mogul Corp.             2.5%
10. Accustaff Inc.                  2.3%


Portfolio Characteristics
- ----------------------------------------
Overall Assets ($MM)                 192
Number of Companies                   66
5 Yr. Historical Earnings Growth     30%
Earnings Growth - net year           28%
P/E Ratio - next year                 15
  (Gardner Lewis earnings estimates)


Performance Summary
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Period Ended                                          Since
  9/30/98               1 Year        3 Year        Inception
- -------------------------------------------------------------
The Chesapeake  
Growth Fund             -24.6%         1.7%           11.5% 
Institutional Shares
- -------------------------------------------------------------


Historical  performance for The Chesapeake Growth Fund Institutional  Series has
been calculated by using the performance of an original class of The Fund (known
as the A Shares)  from  inception  on April 6,1994 until the date of issuance of
the new  Institutional  Series on April 7, 1995, and combining such  performance
with the  performance  of the  Institutional  Series  since  April 7, 1995.  The
performance  quoted represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future
results.  Share price and investment return will vary, so you may have a gain or
loss when you sell shares.

     For more complete information regarding The Fund including charges and
 expenses, obtain a prospectus by calling the Fund directly at (800)430-3863 or
    Gardner Lewis Asset Management, the Investment Advisor at (610)558-2800.

                Must be accompanied or preceded by a prospectus.
                  Capital Investment Group, Inc., Distributor
                           Raleigh, NC (800)525-3863
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

               _________________________________________________________________________________

                                         THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
               _________________________________________________________________________________


                                          PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
                                                 (unaudited)
                                             September 30, 1998

=====================================================    ======================================================
 Quantity  Security                     Market Value      Quantity  Security                      Market Value
=====================================================    ======================================================
   119,000 AES Corporation                 4,410,438        127,400 HCR Manor Care Inc.              3,734,413
   302,200 Accustaff Inc.                  4,457,450         44,700 Hertz Corp.                      1,871,813
   133,300 Adaptec, Inc.                   1,266,350        106,600 IMS Health Inc.                  6,602,538
    48,100 Airborne Freight Corp.            832,731        103,000 Integrated Health Service        1,731,688
    60,800 Allmerica Financial Corp.       3,625,200         67,100 Johns Manville Corp.               763,263
    96,200 American Power Conversion       3,625,538        313,900 Jones Apparel Group, Inc.        7,200,081
    65,800 Ascend Communications           2,993,900        148,500 K Mart Corp.                     1,782,000
    86,100 BE Aerospace, Inc.              1,894,200        161,800 MCI Worldcom Inc.                7,907,975
    64,600 BMC Software, Inc.              3,880,038         48,100 Maytag                           2,296,775
   157,600 Biomet, Inc.                    5,466,750         14,200 McKesson Corp.                   1,301,075
    70,900 Borders Group, Inc.             1,577,525         97,000 Micron Technology                2,952,438
    74,270 CKE Restaurants                 2,209,533        113,900 Mohawk Industries, Inc.          3,118,013
    84,850 Cable Design Technologies       1,081,838        163,700 Mylan Laboratories, Inc.         4,829,150
   189,800 Cabletron Systems               2,135,250        106,300 Networks Associates, Inc.        3,773,650
    70,900 Cadence Design Systems          1,812,381        108,400 Newbridge Networks Corp.         1,944,425
   205,100 CalEnergy                       5,435,150        121,500 Petrol Geo Service ADR           1,936,406
    69,200 Ceridian Corporation            3,970,350         48,100 Platinum Tech, Inc.                865,800
   100,400 Champion Enterprises            2,334,300        170,800 Rational Software Corp.          2,871,575
   162,000 Checkfree Holdings Corp.        1,599,750         77,100 Rite Aid Corporation             2,737,050
    77,600 Comair Holdings, Inc.           2,231,000         98,700 SCI Systems, Inc.                2,658,731
   182,300 DSP Communications, Inc.        1,503,975        101,300 Saks, Inc.                       2,272,919
   107,200 E C I Telecom, Ltd.             2,626,400         42,200 Southdown Inc.                   1,899,000
   184,400 EMC Corporation                10,579,950         50,600 Staples, Inc.                    1,486,375
   113,900 FORE Systems, Inc.              1,893,588         85,700 Sterling Software, Inc.          2,378,175
   116,500 Fairfield Communities           1,165,000         60,800 Suiza Foods                      1,900,000
   101,300 Federal-Mogul Corp.             4,735,775         97,900 Sun Microsystems, Inc.           4,876,644
   138,400 Flowers Industries, Inc.        3,018,850        130,350 Sunterra Corp.                     847,275
    32,900 Forest Laboratories, Inc.       1,130,938        458,700 Systems Software Associates, Inc.2,322,169
    59,700 Gateway 2000, Inc.              3,123,056         70,900 Warnaco Group, Inc.              1,639,563
   153,600 Genesis Health Ventures         1,881,600         88,400 Waste Management, Inc.           4,248,725
    94,500 Genzyme General Division        3,413,813         51,100 Wellpoint Health Networks Inc.   2,864,794
   132,500 Global Industries, Ltd.         1,532,031        252,700 Wolverine World Wide, Inc.       2,748,113
    53,200 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.      2,141,300


                                                                    TOTAL EQUITY                   190,423,926

                                                                    CASH EQUIVALENT                  1,530,108

                                                                    TOTAL ASSETS                   191,954,034
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

            _______________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
            _______________________________________________________


                                                  October 1, 1998




Dear Shareholder:

         The  Chesapeake  Growth Fund Series A closed the third  quarter  with a
loss of 22.4%.  This loss compares to losses of 9.9%,  22.7%,  and 20.1% for the
S&P 500, Nasdaq Industrials, and Russell 2000, respectively,  and leaves us down
12.3% year-to-date.  Negative news revolving around everything from Japanese and
Russian  economic  turmoil to the White House  scandal has  heightened  investor
nervousness,  and in  turn,  market  volatility.  As if these  problems  are not
enough,  the  bankruptcy  of several  hedge  funds and the  well-publicized  Fed
orchestrated  bailout  of Long  Term  Capital  Management  have  further  fueled
anxiety.

         The market's sell-off has been both broad and steep, our portfolio's to
a  greater  degree.  We are  disappointed  with  our  relative  performance  and
attribute it primarily to three things. Most importantly,  we underestimated the
impact that global  concerns  would have on investor  sentiment as it relates to
U.S. retail.  In addition,  the recent  disruption of capital markets created an
inability  for a number of our  companies  to raise  the  funds  needed to fully
execute their aggressive growth plans. Finally, we miscalculated the risk to the
healthcare industry's ability to profit under the government's new reimbursement
plan.

         Most  of the  damage  to  the  market  was  done  in  August,  and  the
preponderance  to smaller  stocks.  The  Russell  2000 was off over 30% from its
April high as compared to the S&P 500 which was off less than 20% from its high.
We  attribute  this  difference  to a lack of trading  liquidity in the smallest
names as price  insensitive  selling ran into buyers reluctant to commit capital
in this  volatile  tape.  At the end of  August,  almost 20% of the names in the
Russell 2000 were down 60% or more from their  highs,  almost half were down 40%
or more, and 75% were down more than 25%. Selling was truly universal in smaller
stocks.

         Macroeconomic  concerns  acted as fuel for this  sell-off as  investors
attempted to project  implications of an uncertain  global economic  environment
against a benign domestic  environment.  Interest rates are low and falling, and
inflation  remains  dormant with  commodity  prices  hitting new lows.  Balanced
against this are the possible  implications of global weakness to U.S. corporate
profits.  Nervousness  about what might happen has driven  investors'  decisions
over the past weeks more than any measurable or real change in the macroeconomic
state.  Problems  in  Russia  illustrate  this  important  distinction.   Though
virtually insignificant as a part of the global economy, with trade representing
less  than 1% of U.S.  gross  domestic  product,  Russian  turmoil  provided  an
emotional  catalyst  that sparked a change in investor  psychology.  Problems in
Asia have far more  fundamental  weight,  and  perhaps it was a lack of positive
change in that region that heightened  investor  nervousness.  The point is that
current  nervousness  is about  what  could  happen,  not what did happen in the
business environment.
<PAGE>


         Since the  beginning of August,  we have logged more than 1500 contacts
with our investment companies, their customers,  competitors and suppliers in an
effort to  quantify  true  business  prospects,  rather than  conjectured  ones.
Further, we have been diligent in our attempts to quantify risks associated with
the most  negative  of  global  macroeconomic  scenarios  as they  relate to our
investment companies.  Our companies are smaller,  less globally oriented,  more
proprietary in their  businesses,  and have earnings that are far less sensitive
to  macroeconomic  change than the typical  larger  company.  In the universe of
giant  multinationals,  selling has been based on the  reasonable  concern  that
future corporate profits may not be able to justify current  valuations.  In the
smaller company universe, selling has been far less fundamentally based.

         We believe a number of developments can turn current market  sentiment.
From a macroeconomic perspective they are a credible reform package for Japan, a
clear direction for the resolution of the White House scandal,  the abatement of
tax related selling which is now severe in small and mid-sized stocks,  and to a
lesser  degree  further  action  on the  part  of the  Federal  Reserve.  From a
microeconomic perspective, it is company earnings. What is important here is not
a complete  resolution  to these  issues,  but a belief on the part of investors
that things will begin to improve.

         This  point  is most  clearly  evidenced  when  studying  the  market's
activity  surrounding  the  Persian  Gulf War.  The best time to invest  was not
January 17th,  the day U.S.  planes began to bomb,  but instead in the middle of
October when the Press was exaggerating the strength of the Republican Guard. In
our  case,  we  would  have  missed  a  portfolio  rally  of 30% had we  waited.
Fortunately,  our discipline precludes us from so doing. And,  ironically,  many
investors  even  missed the late  winter  move  because  they  wanted a complete
resolution to the war before  committing  funds.  By the time the war had ended,
our portfolio  return had further  accelerated  far surpassing its initial gain,
and the S&P 500 had  appreciated 21% from its low. The point is that markets are
anticipatory, thus it is direction that moves them. Conclusion is too late.

         From our  perspective,  the  macroeconomic  issues are being addressed,
with the  Japanese  situation  being the most  tenuous.  Thus,  we believe  that
earnings  should  finally  begin to command an  increasingly  larger  portion of
investor  attention.  In fact,  this  may  already  be  happening.  With  recent
pre-announcements by some of this market's seemingly bulletproof companies, like
Coca-Cola,  Gillette, and Disney, we have seen commensurate compression in their
stock prices.  This makes fundamental sense,  because it is these companies that
rely heavily on foreign sales or traffic for their continued growth.

         Why these price  corrections did not take place sooner is probably more
related to psychology  than anything  else.  Last winter,  as market  volatility
increased over Asian economic concerns, investors sought safe-haven in household
names;  but,  now  that  the  effects  of Asia and the  other  economies  it has
contaminated  are being  felt,  investors  are in a  position  to see its actual
impact and can therefore  adjust their  portfolios  accordingly.  This is why we
long ago concluded  that earnings and valuation are critical and why they should
once again assume their role of historic importance.

         Despite the market's  recent  correction,  larger  companies  are still
trading at price-earnings  multiples that are historically somewhat high, though
some would argue  justifiably  so, given the interest rate  environment.  On the
other hand, in the same interest rate environment, smaller companies are trading
at historically low multiples and at unprecedented  multiples relative to larger
ones.  We have  found  price-earnings  multiples  as low as those now in smaller
stocks in only a handful of modern  periods.  During the  mini-crash  of October
1997,  multiples were not this low; during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait,  multiples
bottomed  at these  levels;  during the crash of 1987,  they  bottomed  at these
levels;  and, through the mid-seventies  bear market,  they reached levels lower
than these, though with much higher interest rates and inflation.
<PAGE>


         In previous periods of great market turmoil,  we have found some of our
best  opportunities as bottoms up fundamental  stockpickers.  It typically takes
some  time for the dust to settle  and the  market  to sort  through  companies'
fundamental prospects in order to differentiate those that sold off for rational
reasons from those that were simply  caught in the  downdraft.  Some of our best
results  in the past  have  been  derived  coming  out of these  types of market
environments.  We feel that our investment  discipline puts us one step ahead of
most market participants in these rebuilding phases, and are busy evaluating the
opportunities currently presented.

Sincerely,



W. Whitfield Gardner                            John L. Lewis, IV
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                               Portfolio Spotlight          September 30, 1998

         Because recent market  activity has been centered around macro economic
events, most of our portfolio's short-term performance can be explained by them.
Nevertheless,  there have been two  significant  longer-term  investment  trends
whose  participating  companies  you  may  have  noticed  under-weighted  in our
portfolio.  The first and most  influential  has been the benefit of a declining
interest  rate  environment  on a  consolidating  financial  services  industry.
Greater  involvement  in financial  services  would have helped our  performance
dramatically  over the past  couple of years,  as it did the indices to which we
compare.  The second trend has been the speculation  surrounding the development
of  the  internet.  Internet  related  companies,  although  not  a  significant
weighting in any benchmark, have garnered a great deal of investor attention and
significantly  benefited  those exposed to them. We thought it important that we
address both trends.

         Until  recently,  as interest rates  declined,  interest rate sensitive
instruments including equities like banks, utilities, and real estate investment
trusts benefited tremendously.  Additionally,  these companies wanting some form
of earnings  growth,  and fueled by higher stock prices,  initiated  acquisition
strategies that further elevated prices in the group. Where we could participate
by investing in companies with more estimable  profits,  we did. But, given that
the businesses of many of these  companies  were highly  susceptible to interest
rate  fluctuations  and had  unacceptably  low growth rates,  we passed over the
majority.  The net result of this  interest rate movement was that the financial
services  sector  accounted for more than half of the performance of the Russell
2000 and one third of that of the Russell  Midcap,  from the  beginning  of 1996
until quarter end. Most dramatic was that smaller bank stocks had five times the
average   return  of  the  Russell  2000.   During  this  period,   we  averaged
significantly  less  exposure to the financial  services  group than the Russell
indices.  We continue to feel strongly that the  managements of the companies we
invest in should have more control over their companies' earnings prospects, and
that  relying on an  interest  rate  decline,  or a  takeover,  for stock  price
appreciation violates one of the major tenants of our investment discipline.  We
will  continue to invest in the growing  number of financial  institutions  that
have taken steps to insulate  themselves from interest rate risk, allowing their
managements better control of profit generation.

         As to the  internet,  we,  like  others,  believe  it will be a  viable
vehicle  for  commerce  and where  practical  are  participating  in its growth.
Unfortunately,  the  general  excitement  surrounding  it has caused many of its
related  companies'  stock prices to come public and then trade at  astronomical
valuations. Most of these companies are yet to produce a profit and will not for
some time. Thus, evaluating their worth is very difficult.  Tangentially,  cable
stocks have been beneficiaries of this internet boom, but they too carry much of
their current valuation for speculative reasons, such as assumed  consolidation,
rather than  measurable  ones, like strong profit growth.  For this reason,  the
only viable approach within our discipline has been to participate through those
companies  helping to build the equipment that makes the internet work and whose
sales and profits are estimable.  Nevertheless, it has been the concept-oriented
companies that have been the strongest performers.

         We have seen this pattern repeated  before,  where the concept precedes
the reality. For instance,  this is the second run for the cable companies whose
fortunes had reversed  approximately a decade ago when investors panicked out of
their  stocks as they came to  realize  that  fundamentals  were far  behind the
excitement.  And just a few years  ago this  same  phenomenon  was  repeated  in
cellular stocks when investors grew to understand that remote mountain locations
did not have the  population  to support  operators'  aggressive  infrastructure
builds. These industries make it, but few in the originally anticipated form. It
takes longer,  is more costly,  more  competitive,  and less  profitable than at
first thought.  Thus,  despite the ramp a number of the internet  related stocks
are now on, there will  ultimately be a day of reckoning when investors will ask
each company management, "What are you going to earn?". In the case of Netscape,
the original internet darling,  this has meant a stock price decline of 75%. Our
discipline is founded in fundamentals, because the market is grounded by them.
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                          Morningstar Ratings Revisited

         With 75% of all small-cap  growth mutual funds currently rated one-star
by  Morningstar,  we  thought it timely to  comment  on the  Morningstar  rating
process. To understand how one investment style can earn such a disproportionate
share of Morningstar's  lowest rating,  one needs to look at how the ratings are
calculated.

         Morningstar  ratings are based on risk  adjusted  performance  within a
broad asset class, e.g. U.S. equities,  U.S. fixed income.  Morningstar compares
each fund's monthly return results against  Treasury Bills and derives a measure
of risk (average  underperformance) and return (excess return). Monthly risk and
return  numbers  are  ranked  against  all other  funds in the  asset  class and
combined,  resulting in a risk adjusted relative performance ranking.  Stars are
assigned based on this relative  ranking.  For a domestic equity fund to receive
five stars, its risk adjusted  performance must be at the top of all U.S. equity
funds  that  Morningstar  tracks.  The point is that in U.S.  equity  funds,  no
distinction is made between  investment style categories like large-cap value or
small-cap growth.

         Over the past several years,  the large-cap growth sector of the market
has performed  tremendously  well,  with  relatively low levels of risk.  Stocks
outside of this universe have fared relatively poorly.  Consequently,  five-star
funds are heavily clustered in the large-cap growth category.  Conversely, fully
75% of Morningstar's  small-cap growth funds rate only one star when compared to
all other U.S. stock funds. Less than 10% of small-cap growth funds rate as high
as three stars, and none rate four stars or five stars.

         So  why  should  these  one-star  funds  be  a part  of  an  investment
portfolio?  Two reasons: future performance and risk diversification.

         There is ample  academic  evidence  that  the  past  performance  of an
investment  category is a poor predictor of its future  returns.  Yet 90% of all
new mutual fund money is invested in five-star and four-star funds whose returns
are based solely on their historical performance;  and currently,  most of these
funds are in the same category,  large-cap growth.  Thus, everyone is driving in
the same  direction,  but looking only in the  rear-view  mirror.  There is also
ample evidence that extraordinary performance of an investment category, good or
bad,  eventually  reverts  to its  average.  Thus,  now  more  than  usual,  the
historical  returns  of  these  currently  strong  performing  funds  may not be
indicative of their future returns.

         When one  considers the impact of star  dependence on  diversification,
the picture only gets worse. Diversification, combining different investments to
smooth out the bumps of their  individual  returns,  lowers average risk without
changing  average  returns.  But, there is no  diversification  if the different
investments all behave  similarly.  Owning several large-cap growth funds offers
limited  diversification benefit over owning one large-cap growth fund. However,
owning a large-cap fund, a small-cap fund, and an  international  fund can offer
more meaningful  diversification.  In today's environment,  with five-star funds
all  clustered in the U.S.  large-cap  growth  category,  a portfolio  comprised
solely of five-star  funds would be absent a significant  part of the investible
universe and thus forego important diversification opportunities.

         Successful  investors  remember  two things.  The first is to avoid the
trap of  piling  into  yesterday's  hot  investment  category  which  may not be
tomorrow's.  The second is to reap the rewards of  diversification  by combining
holdings that do not go up, or more importantly go down, for the same reasons.
<PAGE>

                     _____________________________________

                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
                     _____________________________________

                               September 30, 1998


Investment Strategy
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The  Chesapeake  Growth  Fund  seeks  capital  appreciation   primarily  through
investments in small, medium, and large growth equities.  The cornerstone of the
fund's intensive in-house  fundamental  analysis is in constant contact with the
management,  customers, competitors, and suppliers of both current and potential
investments.


Investment Guidelines
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fund seeks companies that:

  *  are  experiencing  a rapid  growth rate - companies  in our  portfolio  are
     forecasted to grow their profits in excess of 15% annually;

  *  are selling at a stock price not yet fully reflective of their growth rate;

  *  are undergoing  a positive  change created  by new  products,  managements,
     distribution strategies or manufacturing technologies;

  *  have a  strong  balance  sheet  and are less  susceptible to  macroeconomic
     change.


The Largest Industry Groups  [Represented by a Pie Chart in mailings]
- ----------------------------------

     Computers & Peripherals - 12.7%  
     Telecommunications - 9.4%
     Computer Software - 9.3%  
     Business Services - 9.1%  
     Energy Services - 6.9%
     Pharmaceuticals - 6.2% 
     Apparel - 6.0% 
     Healthcare Delivery - 5.3% 
     Retail Sales & Distribution - 5.1% 
     Bldg. Supplies/Housing Related - 4.2 %
     All Others - 25.6%  


About The Investment Advisor
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gardner Lewis Asset  management  serves as investment  advisor to the Chesapeake
Family of Funds.  Overall,  through the funds and separately  managed  accounts,
Gardner Lewis  invests  approximately  $2.6 billion in growth  equities for both
institutions and individuals including some of the top foundations,  endowments,
and pension  plans in the U.S.  Gardner  Lewis was founded in 1990 and employs a
staff of 29. The research team is comprised of 15.
<PAGE>

Ten Largest Holdings
- ----------------------------------------
1.  EMC Corporation                 5.6%
2.  MCI Worldco Inc.                4.2%
3.  Jones Apparel Group, Inc.       3.8%
4.  IMS Health Inc.                 3.5%
5.  Biomet, Inc.                    2.9%
6.  CalEnergy                       2.9%
7.  Sun Microsystems, Inc.          2.6%
8.  Mylan Laboratories              2.5%
9.  Federal-Mogul Corp.             2.5%
10. Accustaff Inc.                  2.3%


Portfolio Characteristics
- ----------------------------------------
Overall Assets ($MM)                 192
Number of Companies                   66
5 Yr. Historical Earnings Growth     30%
Earnings Growth - net year           28%
P/E Ratio - next year                 15
  (Gardner Lewis earnings estimates)


Performance Summary
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Period Ended                                          Since
  9/30/98               1 Year        3 Year        Inception
- -------------------------------------------------------------
The Chesapeake  
Growth Fund             -27.2%         0.3%           10.5% 
Series A
- -------------------------------------------------------------


Fund performance is net of the maximum 3% sales load. Historical performance for
The Chesapeake Growth Fund Series A has been calculated by using the performance
of the  original  class of The Fund (now called the  Institutional  Shares) from
inception on April 6, 1994 until the date of issuance of the new Series A Shares
on April , 1995,  and combining  such  performance  with the  performance of the
Series A Shares since April 7, 1995.  The  performance  quoted  represents  past
performance and is not a guarantee of future results. Share price and investment
return will vary, so you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares.

     For more complete information regarding The Fund including charges and
 expenses, obtain a prospectus by calling the Fund directly at (800)430-3863 or
    Gardner Lewis Asset Management, the Investment Advisor at (610)558-2800.

                Must be accompanied or preceded by a prospectus.
                  Capital Investment Group, Inc., Distributor
                           Raleigh, NC (800)525-3863

<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

               _________________________________________________________________________________

                                         THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
               _________________________________________________________________________________


                                          PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
                                                 (unaudited)
                                             September 30, 1998

=====================================================    ======================================================
 Quantity  Security                     Market Value      Quantity  Security                      Market Value
=====================================================    ======================================================
   119,000 AES Corporation                 4,410,438        127,400 HCR Manor Care Inc.              3,734,413
   302,200 Accustaff Inc.                  4,457,450         44,700 Hertz Corp.                      1,871,813
   133,300 Adaptec, Inc.                   1,266,350        106,600 IMS Health Inc.                  6,602,538
    48,100 Airborne Freight Corp.            832,731        103,000 Integrated Health Service        1,731,688
    60,800 Allmerica Financial Corp.       3,625,200         67,100 Johns Manville Corp.               763,263
    96,200 American Power Conversion       3,625,538        313,900 Jones Apparel Group, Inc.        7,200,081
    65,800 Ascend Communications           2,993,900        148,500 K Mart Corp.                     1,782,000
    86,100 BE Aerospace, Inc.              1,894,200        161,800 MCI Worldcom Inc.                7,907,975
    64,600 BMC Software, Inc.              3,880,038         48,100 Maytag                           2,296,775
   157,600 Biomet, Inc.                    5,466,750         14,200 McKesson Corp.                   1,301,075
    70,900 Borders Group, Inc.             1,577,525         97,000 Micron Technology                2,952,438
    74,270 CKE Restaurants                 2,209,533        113,900 Mohawk Industries, Inc.          3,118,013
    84,850 Cable Design Technologies       1,081,838        163,700 Mylan Laboratories, Inc.         4,829,150
   189,800 Cabletron Systems               2,135,250        106,300 Networks Associates, Inc.        3,773,650
    70,900 Cadence Design Systems          1,812,381        108,400 Newbridge Networks Corp.         1,944,425
   205,100 CalEnergy                       5,435,150        121,500 Petrol Geo Service ADR           1,936,406
    69,200 Ceridian Corporation            3,970,350         48,100 Platinum Tech, Inc.                865,800
   100,400 Champion Enterprises            2,334,300        170,800 Rational Software Corp.          2,871,575
   162,000 Checkfree Holdings Corp.        1,599,750         77,100 Rite Aid Corporation             2,737,050
    77,600 Comair Holdings, Inc.           2,231,000         98,700 SCI Systems, Inc.                2,658,731
   182,300 DSP Communications, Inc.        1,503,975        101,300 Saks, Inc.                       2,272,919
   107,200 E C I Telecom, Ltd.             2,626,400         42,200 Southdown Inc.                   1,899,000
   184,400 EMC Corporation                10,579,950         50,600 Staples, Inc.                    1,486,375
   113,900 FORE Systems, Inc.              1,893,588         85,700 Sterling Software, Inc.          2,378,175
   116,500 Fairfield Communities           1,165,000         60,800 Suiza Foods                      1,900,000
   101,300 Federal-Mogul Corp.             4,735,775         97,900 Sun Microsystems, Inc.           4,876,644
   138,400 Flowers Industries, Inc.        3,018,850        130,350 Sunterra Corp.                     847,275
    32,900 Forest Laboratories, Inc.       1,130,938        458,700 Systems Software Associates, Inc.2,322,169
    59,700 Gateway 2000, Inc.              3,123,056         70,900 Warnaco Group, Inc.              1,639,563
   153,600 Genesis Health Ventures         1,881,600         88,400 Waste Management, Inc.           4,248,725
    94,500 Genzyme General Division        3,413,813         51,100 Wellpoint Health Networks Inc.   2,864,794
   132,500 Global Industries, Ltd.         1,532,031        252,700 Wolverine World Wide, Inc.       2,748,113
    53,200 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.      2,141,300


                                                                    TOTAL EQUITY                   190,423,926

                                                                    CASH EQUIVALENT                  1,530,108

                                                                    TOTAL ASSETS                   191,954,034
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

            _______________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
            _______________________________________________________


                                                         October 1, 1998





Dear Shareholder:

         The  Chesapeake  Growth Fund Series C closed the third  quarter  with a
loss of 22.8%.  This loss compares to losses of 9.9%,  22.7%,  and 20.1% for the
S&P 500, Nasdaq Industrials, and Russell 2000, respectively,  and leaves us down
13.5% year-to-date.  Negative news revolving around everything from Japanese and
Russian  economic  turmoil to the White House  scandal has  heightened  investor
nervousness,  and in  turn,  market  volatility.  As if these  problems  are not
enough,  the  bankruptcy  of several  hedge  funds and the  well-publicized  Fed
orchestrated  bailout  of Long  Term  Capital  Management  have  further  fueled
anxiety.

         The market's sell-off has been both broad and steep, our portfolio's to
a  greater  degree.  We are  disappointed  with  our  relative  performance  and
attribute it primarily to three things. Most importantly,  we underestimated the
impact that global  concerns  would have on investor  sentiment as it relates to
U.S. retail.  In addition,  the recent  disruption of capital markets created an
inability  for a number of our  companies  to raise  the  funds  needed to fully
execute their aggressive growth plans. Finally, we miscalculated the risk to the
healthcare industry's ability to profit under the government's new reimbursement
plan.

         Most  of the  damage  to  the  market  was  done  in  August,  and  the
preponderance  to smaller  stocks.  The  Russell  2000 was off over 30% from its
April high as compared to the S&P 500 which was off less than 20% from its high.
We  attribute  this  difference  to a lack of trading  liquidity in the smallest
names as price  insensitive  selling ran into buyers reluctant to commit capital
in this  volatile  tape.  At the end of  August,  almost 20% of the names in the
Russell 2000 were down 60% or more from their  highs,  almost half were down 40%
or more, and 75% were down more than 25%. Selling was truly universal in smaller
stocks.

         Macroeconomic  concerns  acted as fuel for this  sell-off as  investors
attempted to project  implications of an uncertain  global economic  environment
against a benign domestic  environment.  Interest rates are low and falling, and
inflation  remains  dormant with  commodity  prices  hitting new lows.  Balanced
against this are the possible  implications of global weakness to U.S. corporate
profits.  Nervousness  about what might happen has driven  investors'  decisions
over the past weeks more than any measurable or real change in the macroeconomic
state.  Problems  in  Russia  illustrate  this  important  distinction.   Though
virtually insignificant as a part of the global economy, with trade representing
less  than 1% of U.S.  gross  domestic  product,  Russian  turmoil  provided  an
emotional  catalyst  that sparked a change in investor  psychology.  Problems in
Asia have far more  fundamental  weight,  and  perhaps it was a lack of positive
change in that region that heightened  investor  nervousness.  The point is that
current  nervousness  is about  what  could  happen,  not what did happen in the
business environment.
<PAGE>


         Since the  beginning of August,  we have logged more than 1500 contacts
with our investment companies, their customers,  competitors and suppliers in an
effort to  quantify  true  business  prospects,  rather than  conjectured  ones.
Further, we have been diligent in our attempts to quantify risks associated with
the most  negative  of  global  macroeconomic  scenarios  as they  relate to our
investment companies.  Our companies are smaller,  less globally oriented,  more
proprietary in their  businesses,  and have earnings that are far less sensitive
to  macroeconomic  change than the typical  larger  company.  In the universe of
giant  multinationals,  selling has been based on the  reasonable  concern  that
future corporate profits may not be able to justify current  valuations.  In the
smaller company universe, selling has been far less fundamentally based.

         We believe a number of developments can turn current market  sentiment.
From a macroeconomic perspective they are a credible reform package for Japan, a
clear direction for the resolution of the White House scandal,  the abatement of
tax related selling which is now severe in small and mid-sized stocks,  and to a
lesser  degree  further  action  on the  part  of the  Federal  Reserve.  From a
microeconomic perspective, it is company earnings. What is important here is not
a complete  resolution  to these  issues,  but a belief on the part of investors
that things will begin to improve.

         This  point  is most  clearly  evidenced  when  studying  the  market's
activity  surrounding  the  Persian  Gulf War.  The best time to invest  was not
January 17th,  the day U.S.  planes began to bomb,  but instead in the middle of
October when the Press was exaggerating the strength of the Republican Guard. In
our  case,  we  would  have  missed  a  portfolio  rally  of 30% had we  waited.
Fortunately,  our discipline precludes us from so doing. And,  ironically,  many
investors  even  missed the late  winter  move  because  they  wanted a complete
resolution to the war before  committing  funds.  By the time the war had ended,
our portfolio  return had further  accelerated  far surpassing its initial gain,
and the S&P 500 had  appreciated 21% from its low. The point is that markets are
anticipatory, thus it is direction that moves them. Conclusion is too late.

         From our  perspective,  the  macroeconomic  issues are being addressed,
with the  Japanese  situation  being the most  tenuous.  Thus,  we believe  that
earnings  should  finally  begin to command an  increasingly  larger  portion of
investor  attention.  In fact,  this  may  already  be  happening.  With  recent
pre-announcements by some of this market's seemingly bulletproof companies, like
Coca-Cola,  Gillette, and Disney, we have seen commensurate compression in their
stock prices.  This makes fundamental sense,  because it is these companies that
rely heavily on foreign sales or traffic for their continued growth.

         Why these price  corrections did not take place sooner is probably more
related to psychology  than anything  else.  Last winter,  as market  volatility
increased over Asian economic concerns, investors sought safe-haven in household
names;  but,  now  that  the  effects  of Asia and the  other  economies  it has
contaminated  are being  felt,  investors  are in a  position  to see its actual
impact and can therefore  adjust their  portfolios  accordingly.  This is why we
long ago concluded  that earnings and valuation are critical and why they should
once again assume their role of historic importance.

         Despite the market's  recent  correction,  larger  companies  are still
trading at price-earnings  multiples that are historically somewhat high, though
some would argue  justifiably  so, given the interest rate  environment.  On the
other hand, in the same interest rate environment, smaller companies are trading
at historically low multiples and at unprecedented  multiples relative to larger
ones.  We have  found  price-earnings  multiples  as low as those now in smaller
stocks in only a handful of modern  periods.  During the  mini-crash  of October
1997,  multiples were not this low; during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait,  multiples
bottomed  at these  levels;  during the crash of 1987,  they  bottomed  at these
levels;  and, through the mid-seventies  bear market,  they reached levels lower
than these, though with much higher interest rates and inflation.
<PAGE>

         In previous periods of great market turmoil,  we have found some of our
best  opportunities as bottoms up fundamental  stockpickers.  It typically takes
some  time for the dust to settle  and the  market  to sort  through  companies'
fundamental prospects in order to differentiate those that sold off for rational
reasons from those that were simply  caught in the  downdraft.  Some of our best
results  in the past  have  been  derived  coming  out of these  types of market
environments.  We feel that our investment  discipline puts us one step ahead of
most market participants in these rebuilding phases, and are busy evaluating the
opportunities currently presented.

Sincerely,



W. Whitfield Gardner                              John L. Lewis, IV
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                               Portfolio Spotlight          September 30, 1998

         Because recent market  activity has been centered around macro economic
events, most of our portfolio's short-term performance can be explained by them.
Nevertheless,  there have been two  significant  longer-term  investment  trends
whose  participating  companies  you  may  have  noticed  under-weighted  in our
portfolio.  The first and most  influential  has been the benefit of a declining
interest  rate  environment  on a  consolidating  financial  services  industry.
Greater  involvement  in financial  services  would have helped our  performance
dramatically  over the past  couple of years,  as it did the indices to which we
compare.  The second trend has been the speculation  surrounding the development
of  the  internet.  Internet  related  companies,  although  not  a  significant
weighting in any benchmark, have garnered a great deal of investor attention and
significantly  benefited  those exposed to them. We thought it important that we
address both trends.

         Until  recently,  as interest rates  declined,  interest rate sensitive
instruments including equities like banks, utilities, and real estate investment
trusts benefited tremendously.  Additionally,  these companies wanting some form
of earnings  growth,  and fueled by higher stock prices,  initiated  acquisition
strategies that further elevated prices in the group. Where we could participate
by investing in companies with more estimable  profits,  we did. But, given that
the businesses of many of these  companies  were highly  susceptible to interest
rate  fluctuations  and had  unacceptably  low growth rates,  we passed over the
majority.  The net result of this  interest rate movement was that the financial
services  sector  accounted for more than half of the performance of the Russell
2000 and one third of that of the Russell  Midcap,  from the  beginning  of 1996
until quarter end. Most dramatic was that smaller bank stocks had five times the
average   return  of  the  Russell  2000.   During  this  period,   we  averaged
significantly  less  exposure to the financial  services  group than the Russell
indices.  We continue to feel strongly that the  managements of the companies we
invest in should have more control over their companies' earnings prospects, and
that  relying on an  interest  rate  decline,  or a  takeover,  for stock  price
appreciation violates one of the major tenants of our investment discipline.  We
will  continue to invest in the growing  number of financial  institutions  that
have taken steps to insulate  themselves from interest rate risk, allowing their
managements better control of profit generation.

         As to the  internet,  we,  like  others,  believe  it will be a  viable
vehicle  for  commerce  and where  practical  are  participating  in its growth.
Unfortunately,  the  general  excitement  surrounding  it has caused many of its
related  companies'  stock prices to come public and then trade at  astronomical
valuations. Most of these companies are yet to produce a profit and will not for
some time. Thus, evaluating their worth is very difficult.  Tangentially,  cable
stocks have been beneficiaries of this internet boom, but they too carry much of
their current valuation for speculative reasons, such as assumed  consolidation,
rather than  measurable  ones, like strong profit growth.  For this reason,  the
only viable approach within our discipline has been to participate through those
companies  helping to build the equipment that makes the internet work and whose
sales and profits are estimable.  Nevertheless, it has been the concept-oriented
companies that have been the strongest performers.

         We have seen this pattern repeated  before,  where the concept precedes
the reality. For instance,  this is the second run for the cable companies whose
fortunes had reversed  approximately a decade ago when investors panicked out of
their  stocks as they came to  realize  that  fundamentals  were far  behind the
excitement.  And just a few years  ago this  same  phenomenon  was  repeated  in
cellular stocks when investors grew to understand that remote mountain locations
did not have the  population  to support  operators'  aggressive  infrastructure
builds. These industries make it, but few in the originally anticipated form. It
takes longer,  is more costly,  more  competitive,  and less  profitable than at
first thought.  Thus,  despite the ramp a number of the internet  related stocks
are now on, there will  ultimately be a day of reckoning when investors will ask
each company management, "What are you going to earn?". In the case of Netscape,
the original internet darling,  this has meant a stock price decline of 75%. Our
discipline is founded in fundamentals, because the market is grounded by them.
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                          Morningstar Ratings Revisited

         With 75% of all small-cap  growth mutual funds currently rated one-star
by  Morningstar,  we  thought it timely to  comment  on the  Morningstar  rating
process. To understand how one investment style can earn such a disproportionate
share of Morningstar's  lowest rating,  one needs to look at how the ratings are
calculated.

         Morningstar  ratings are based on risk  adjusted  performance  within a
broad asset class, e.g. U.S. equities,  U.S. fixed income.  Morningstar compares
each fund's monthly return results against  Treasury Bills and derives a measure
of risk (average  underperformance) and return (excess return). Monthly risk and
return  numbers  are  ranked  against  all other  funds in the  asset  class and
combined,  resulting in a risk adjusted relative performance ranking.  Stars are
assigned based on this relative  ranking.  For a domestic equity fund to receive
five stars, its risk adjusted  performance must be at the top of all U.S. equity
funds  that  Morningstar  tracks.  The point is that in U.S.  equity  funds,  no
distinction is made between  investment style categories like large-cap value or
small-cap growth.

         Over the past several years,  the large-cap growth sector of the market
has performed  tremendously  well,  with  relatively low levels of risk.  Stocks
outside of this universe have fared relatively poorly.  Consequently,  five-star
funds are heavily clustered in the large-cap growth category.  Conversely, fully
75% of Morningstar's  small-cap growth funds rate only one star when compared to
all other U.S. stock funds. Less than 10% of small-cap growth funds rate as high
as three stars, and none rate four stars or five stars.

         So  why  should  these  one-star  funds  be  a part  of  an  investment
portfolio?  Two reasons: future performance and risk diversification.

         There is ample  academic  evidence  that  the  past  performance  of an
investment  category is a poor predictor of its future  returns.  Yet 90% of all
new mutual fund money is invested in five-star and four-star funds whose returns
are based solely on their historical performance;  and currently,  most of these
funds are in the same category,  large-cap growth.  Thus, everyone is driving in
the same  direction,  but looking only in the  rear-view  mirror.  There is also
ample evidence that extraordinary performance of an investment category, good or
bad,  eventually  reverts  to its  average.  Thus,  now  more  than  usual,  the
historical  returns  of  these  currently  strong  performing  funds  may not be
indicative of their future returns.

         When one  considers the impact of star  dependence on  diversification,
the picture only gets worse. Diversification, combining different investments to
smooth out the bumps of their  individual  returns,  lowers average risk without
changing  average  returns.  But, there is no  diversification  if the different
investments all behave  similarly.  Owning several large-cap growth funds offers
limited  diversification benefit over owning one large-cap growth fund. However,
owning a large-cap fund, a small-cap fund, and an  international  fund can offer
more meaningful  diversification.  In today's environment,  with five-star funds
all  clustered in the U.S.  large-cap  growth  category,  a portfolio  comprised
solely of five-star  funds would be absent a significant  part of the investible
universe and thus forego important diversification opportunities.

         Successful  investors  remember  two things.  The first is to avoid the
trap of  piling  into  yesterday's  hot  investment  category  which  may not be
tomorrow's.  The second is to reap the rewards of  diversification  by combining
holdings that do not go up, or more importantly go down, for the same reasons.
<PAGE>

                     _____________________________________

                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
                     _____________________________________

                               September 30, 1998


Investment Strategy
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The  Chesapeake  Growth  Fund  seeks  capital  appreciation   primarily  through
investments in small, medium, and large growth equities.  The cornerstone of the
fund's intensive in-house  fundamental  analysis is in constant contact with the
management,  customers, competitors, and suppliers of both current and potential
investments.


Investment Guidelines
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fund seeks companies that:

  *  are  experiencing  a rapid  growth rate - companies  in our  portfolio  are
     forecasted to grow their profits in excess of 15% annually;

  *  are selling at a stock price not yet fully reflective of their growth rate;

  *  are undergoing  a positive  change created  by new  products,  managements,
     distribution strategies or manufacturing technologies;

  *  have a  strong  balance  sheet  and are less  susceptible to  macroeconomic
     change.


The Largest Industry Groups  [Represented by a Pie Chart in mailings]
- ----------------------------------

     Computers & Peripherals - 12.7%  
     Telecommunications - 9.4%
     Computer Software - 9.3%  
     Business Services - 9.1%  
     Energy Services - 6.9%
     Pharmaceuticals - 6.2% 
     Apparel - 6.0% 
     Healthcare Delivery - 5.3% 
     Retail Sales & Distribution - 5.1% 
     Bldg. Supplies/Housing Related - 4.2 %
     All Others - 25.6%  


About The Investment Advisor
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gardner Lewis Asset  management  serves as investment  advisor to the Chesapeake
Family of Funds.  Overall,  through the funds and separately  managed  accounts,
Gardner Lewis  invests  approximately  $2.6 billion in growth  equities for both
institutions and individuals including some of the top foundations,  endowments,
and pension  plans in the U.S.  Gardner  Lewis was founded in 1990 and employs a
staff of 29. The research team is comprised of 15.
<PAGE>

Ten Largest Holdings
- ----------------------------------------
1.  EMC Corporation                 5.6%
2.  MCI Worldco Inc.                4.2%
3.  Jones Apparel Group, Inc.       3.8%
4.  IMS Health Inc.                 3.5%
5.  Biomet, Inc.                    2.9%
6.  CalEnergy                       2.9%
7.  Sun Microsystems, Inc.          2.6%
8.  Mylan Laboratories              2.5%
9.  Federal-Mogul Corp.             2.5%
10. Accustaff Inc.                  2.3%


Portfolio Characteristics
- ----------------------------------------
Overall Assets ($MM)                 192
Number of Companies                   66
5 Yr. Historical Earnings Growth     30%
Earnings Growth - net year           28%
P/E Ratio - next year                 15
  (Gardner Lewis earnings estimates)


Performance Summary
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Period Ended                                          Since
  9/30/98               1 Year        3 Year        Inception
- -------------------------------------------------------------
The Chesapeake  
Growth Fund             -26.3%         0.1%           8.2% 
Series C
- -------------------------------------------------------------


The  inception  date  of the  Series  C of the  Fund  was  April  7,  1995.  The
performance  quoted represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future
results.  Share price and investment return will vary, so you may have a gain or
loss when you sell shares.


     For more complete information regarding The Fund including charges and
 expenses, obtain a prospectus by calling the Fund directly at (800)430-3863 or
    Gardner Lewis Asset Management, the Investment Advisor at (610)558-2800.

                Must be accompanied or preceded by a prospectus.
                  Capital Investment Group, Inc., Distributor
                           Raleigh, NC (800)525-3863
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

               _________________________________________________________________________________

                                         THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
               _________________________________________________________________________________


                                          PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
                                                 (unaudited)
                                             September 30, 1998

=====================================================    ======================================================
 Quantity  Security                     Market Value      Quantity  Security                      Market Value
=====================================================    ======================================================
   119,000 AES Corporation                 4,410,438        127,400 HCR Manor Care Inc.              3,734,413
   302,200 Accustaff Inc.                  4,457,450         44,700 Hertz Corp.                      1,871,813
   133,300 Adaptec, Inc.                   1,266,350        106,600 IMS Health Inc.                  6,602,538
    48,100 Airborne Freight Corp.            832,731        103,000 Integrated Health Service        1,731,688
    60,800 Allmerica Financial Corp.       3,625,200         67,100 Johns Manville Corp.               763,263
    96,200 American Power Conversion       3,625,538        313,900 Jones Apparel Group, Inc.        7,200,081
    65,800 Ascend Communications           2,993,900        148,500 K Mart Corp.                     1,782,000
    86,100 BE Aerospace, Inc.              1,894,200        161,800 MCI Worldcom Inc.                7,907,975
    64,600 BMC Software, Inc.              3,880,038         48,100 Maytag                           2,296,775
   157,600 Biomet, Inc.                    5,466,750         14,200 McKesson Corp.                   1,301,075
    70,900 Borders Group, Inc.             1,577,525         97,000 Micron Technology                2,952,438
    74,270 CKE Restaurants                 2,209,533        113,900 Mohawk Industries, Inc.          3,118,013
    84,850 Cable Design Technologies       1,081,838        163,700 Mylan Laboratories, Inc.         4,829,150
   189,800 Cabletron Systems               2,135,250        106,300 Networks Associates, Inc.        3,773,650
    70,900 Cadence Design Systems          1,812,381        108,400 Newbridge Networks Corp.         1,944,425
   205,100 CalEnergy                       5,435,150        121,500 Petrol Geo Service ADR           1,936,406
    69,200 Ceridian Corporation            3,970,350         48,100 Platinum Tech, Inc.                865,800
   100,400 Champion Enterprises            2,334,300        170,800 Rational Software Corp.          2,871,575
   162,000 Checkfree Holdings Corp.        1,599,750         77,100 Rite Aid Corporation             2,737,050
    77,600 Comair Holdings, Inc.           2,231,000         98,700 SCI Systems, Inc.                2,658,731
   182,300 DSP Communications, Inc.        1,503,975        101,300 Saks, Inc.                       2,272,919
   107,200 E C I Telecom, Ltd.             2,626,400         42,200 Southdown Inc.                   1,899,000
   184,400 EMC Corporation                10,579,950         50,600 Staples, Inc.                    1,486,375
   113,900 FORE Systems, Inc.              1,893,588         85,700 Sterling Software, Inc.          2,378,175
   116,500 Fairfield Communities           1,165,000         60,800 Suiza Foods                      1,900,000
   101,300 Federal-Mogul Corp.             4,735,775         97,900 Sun Microsystems, Inc.           4,876,644
   138,400 Flowers Industries, Inc.        3,018,850        130,350 Sunterra Corp.                     847,275
    32,900 Forest Laboratories, Inc.       1,130,938        458,700 Systems Software Associates, Inc.2,322,169
    59,700 Gateway 2000, Inc.              3,123,056         70,900 Warnaco Group, Inc.              1,639,563
   153,600 Genesis Health Ventures         1,881,600         88,400 Waste Management, Inc.           4,248,725
    94,500 Genzyme General Division        3,413,813         51,100 Wellpoint Health Networks Inc.   2,864,794
   132,500 Global Industries, Ltd.         1,532,031        252,700 Wolverine World Wide, Inc.       2,748,113
    53,200 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.      2,141,300


                                                                    TOTAL EQUITY                   190,423,926

                                                                    CASH EQUIVALENT                  1,530,108

                                                                    TOTAL ASSETS                   191,954,034
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

           __________________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
           __________________________________________________________


                                                         October 1, 1998





Dear Shareholder:

         The  Chesapeake  Growth Fund Series D closed the third  quarter  with a
loss of 22.5%.  This loss compares to losses of 9.9%,  22.7%,  and 20.1% for the
S&P 500, Nasdaq Industrials, and Russell 2000, respectively,  and leaves us down
12.7% year-to-date.  Negative news revolving around everything from Japanese and
Russian  economic  turmoil to the White House  scandal has  heightened  investor
nervousness,  and in  turn,  market  volatility.  As if these  problems  are not
enough,  the  bankruptcy  of several  hedge  funds and the  well-publicized  Fed
orchestrated  bailout  of Long  Term  Capital  Management  have  further  fueled
anxiety.

         The market's sell-off has been both broad and steep, our portfolio's to
a  greater  degree.  We are  disappointed  with  our  relative  performance  and
attribute it primarily to three things. Most importantly,  we underestimated the
impact that global  concerns  would have on investor  sentiment as it relates to
U.S. retail.  In addition,  the recent  disruption of capital markets created an
inability  for a number of our  companies  to raise  the  funds  needed to fully
execute their aggressive growth plans. Finally, we miscalculated the risk to the
healthcare industry's ability to profit under the government's new reimbursement
plan.

         Most  of the  damage  to  the  market  was  done  in  August,  and  the
preponderance  to smaller  stocks.  The  Russell  2000 was off over 30% from its
April high as compared to the S&P 500 which was off less than 20% from its high.
We  attribute  this  difference  to a lack of trading  liquidity in the smallest
names as price  insensitive  selling ran into buyers reluctant to commit capital
in this  volatile  tape.  At the end of  August,  almost 20% of the names in the
Russell 2000 were down 60% or more from their  highs,  almost half were down 40%
or more, and 75% were down more than 25%. Selling was truly universal in smaller
stocks.

         Macroeconomic  concerns  acted as fuel for this  sell-off as  investors
attempted to project  implications of an uncertain  global economic  environment
against a benign domestic  environment.  Interest rates are low and falling, and
inflation  remains  dormant with  commodity  prices  hitting new lows.  Balanced
against this are the possible  implications of global weakness to U.S. corporate
profits.  Nervousness  about what might happen has driven  investors'  decisions
over the past weeks more than any measurable or real change in the macroeconomic
state.  Problems  in  Russia  illustrate  this  important  distinction.   Though
virtually insignificant as a part of the global economy, with trade representing
less  than 1% of U.S.  gross  domestic  product,  Russian  turmoil  provided  an
emotional  catalyst  that sparked a change in investor  psychology.  Problems in
Asia have far more  fundamental  weight,  and  perhaps it was a lack of positive
change in that region that heightened  investor  nervousness.  The point is that
current  nervousness  is about  what  could  happen,  not what did happen in the
business environment.

<PAGE>


         Since the  beginning of August,  we have logged more than 1500 contacts
with our investment companies, their customers,  competitors and suppliers in an
effort to  quantify  true  business  prospects,  rather than  conjectured  ones.
Further, we have been diligent in our attempts to quantify risks associated with
the most  negative  of  global  macroeconomic  scenarios  as they  relate to our
investment companies.  Our companies are smaller,  less globally oriented,  more
proprietary in their  businesses,  and have earnings that are far less sensitive
to  macroeconomic  change than the typical  larger  company.  In the universe of
giant  multinationals,  selling has been based on the  reasonable  concern  that
future corporate profits may not be able to justify current  valuations.  In the
smaller company universe, selling has been far less fundamentally based.

         We believe a number of developments can turn current market  sentiment.
From a macroeconomic perspective they are a credible reform package for Japan, a
clear direction for the resolution of the White House scandal,  the abatement of
tax related selling which is now severe in small and mid-sized stocks,  and to a
lesser  degree  further  action  on the  part  of the  Federal  Reserve.  From a
microeconomic perspective, it is company earnings. What is important here is not
a complete  resolution  to these  issues,  but a belief on the part of investors
that things will begin to improve.

         This  point  is most  clearly  evidenced  when  studying  the  market's
activity  surrounding  the  Persian  Gulf War.  The best time to invest  was not
January 17th,  the day U.S.  planes began to bomb,  but instead in the middle of
October when the Press was exaggerating the strength of the Republican Guard. In
our  case,  we  would  have  missed  a  portfolio  rally  of 30% had we  waited.
Fortunately,  our discipline precludes us from so doing. And,  ironically,  many
investors  even  missed the late  winter  move  because  they  wanted a complete
resolution to the war before  committing  funds.  By the time the war had ended,
our portfolio  return had further  accelerated  far surpassing its initial gain,
and the S&P 500 had  appreciated 21% from its low. The point is that markets are
anticipatory, thus it is direction that moves them. Conclusion is too late.

         From our  perspective,  the  macroeconomic  issues are being addressed,
with the  Japanese  situation  being the most  tenuous.  Thus,  we believe  that
earnings  should  finally  begin to command an  increasingly  larger  portion of
investor  attention.  In fact,  this  may  already  be  happening.  With  recent
pre-announcements by some of this market's seemingly bulletproof companies, like
Coca-Cola,  Gillette, and Disney, we have seen commensurate compression in their
stock prices.  This makes fundamental sense,  because it is these companies that
rely heavily on foreign sales or traffic for their continued growth.

         Why these price  corrections did not take place sooner is probably more
related to psychology  than anything  else.  Last winter,  as market  volatility
increased over Asian economic concerns, investors sought safe-haven in household
names;  but,  now  that  the  effects  of Asia and the  other  economies  it has
contaminated  are being  felt,  investors  are in a  position  to see its actual
impact and can therefore  adjust their  portfolios  accordingly.  This is why we
long ago concluded  that earnings and valuation are critical and why they should
once again assume their role of historic importance.

         Despite the market's  recent  correction,  larger  companies  are still
trading at price-earnings  multiples that are historically somewhat high, though
some would argue  justifiably  so, given the interest rate  environment.  On the
other hand, in the same interest rate environment, smaller companies are trading
at historically low multiples and at unprecedented  multiples relative to larger
ones.  We have  found  price-earnings  multiples  as low as those now in smaller
stocks in only a handful of modern  periods.  During the  mini-crash  of October
1997,  multiples were not this low; during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait,  multiples
bottomed  at these  levels;  during the crash of 1987,  they  bottomed  at these
levels;  and, through the mid-seventies  bear market,  they reached levels lower
than these, though with much higher interest rates and inflation.
<PAGE>

         In previous periods of great market turmoil,  we have found some of our
best  opportunities as bottoms up fundamental  stockpickers.  It typically takes
some  time for the dust to settle  and the  market  to sort  through  companies'
fundamental prospects in order to differentiate those that sold off for rational
reasons from those that were simply  caught in the  downdraft.  Some of our best
results  in the past  have  been  derived  coming  out of these  types of market
environments.  We feel that our investment  discipline puts us one step ahead of
most market participants in these rebuilding phases, and are busy evaluating the
opportunities currently presented.

Sincerely,



W. Whitfield Gardner                                   John L. Lewis, IV
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                               Portfolio Spotlight          September 30, 1998

         Because recent market  activity has been centered around macro economic
events, most of our portfolio's short-term performance can be explained by them.
Nevertheless,  there have been two  significant  longer-term  investment  trends
whose  participating  companies  you  may  have  noticed  under-weighted  in our
portfolio.  The first and most  influential  has been the benefit of a declining
interest  rate  environment  on a  consolidating  financial  services  industry.
Greater  involvement  in financial  services  would have helped our  performance
dramatically  over the past  couple of years,  as it did the indices to which we
compare.  The second trend has been the speculation  surrounding the development
of  the  internet.  Internet  related  companies,  although  not  a  significant
weighting in any benchmark, have garnered a great deal of investor attention and
significantly  benefited  those exposed to them. We thought it important that we
address both trends.

         Until  recently,  as interest rates  declined,  interest rate sensitive
instruments including equities like banks, utilities, and real estate investment
trusts benefited tremendously.  Additionally,  these companies wanting some form
of earnings  growth,  and fueled by higher stock prices,  initiated  acquisition
strategies that further elevated prices in the group. Where we could participate
by investing in companies with more estimable  profits,  we did. But, given that
the businesses of many of these  companies  were highly  susceptible to interest
rate  fluctuations  and had  unacceptably  low growth rates,  we passed over the
majority.  The net result of this  interest rate movement was that the financial
services  sector  accounted for more than half of the performance of the Russell
2000 and one third of that of the Russell  Midcap,  from the  beginning  of 1996
until quarter end. Most dramatic was that smaller bank stocks had five times the
average   return  of  the  Russell  2000.   During  this  period,   we  averaged
significantly  less  exposure to the financial  services  group than the Russell
indices.  We continue to feel strongly that the  managements of the companies we
invest in should have more control over their companies' earnings prospects, and
that  relying on an  interest  rate  decline,  or a  takeover,  for stock  price
appreciation violates one of the major tenants of our investment discipline.  We
will  continue to invest in the growing  number of financial  institutions  that
have taken steps to insulate  themselves from interest rate risk, allowing their
managements better control of profit generation.

         As to the  internet,  we,  like  others,  believe  it will be a  viable
vehicle  for  commerce  and where  practical  are  participating  in its growth.
Unfortunately,  the  general  excitement  surrounding  it has caused many of its
related  companies'  stock prices to come public and then trade at  astronomical
valuations. Most of these companies are yet to produce a profit and will not for
some time. Thus, evaluating their worth is very difficult.  Tangentially,  cable
stocks have been beneficiaries of this internet boom, but they too carry much of
their current valuation for speculative reasons, such as assumed  consolidation,
rather than  measurable  ones, like strong profit growth.  For this reason,  the
only viable approach within our discipline has been to participate through those
companies  helping to build the equipment that makes the internet work and whose
sales and profits are estimable.  Nevertheless, it has been the concept-oriented
companies that have been the strongest performers.

         We have seen this pattern repeated  before,  where the concept precedes
the reality. For instance,  this is the second run for the cable companies whose
fortunes had reversed  approximately a decade ago when investors panicked out of
their  stocks as they came to  realize  that  fundamentals  were far  behind the
excitement.  And just a few years  ago this  same  phenomenon  was  repeated  in
cellular stocks when investors grew to understand that remote mountain locations
did not have the  population  to support  operators'  aggressive  infrastructure
builds. These industries make it, but few in the originally anticipated form. It
takes longer,  is more costly,  more  competitive,  and less  profitable than at
first thought.  Thus,  despite the ramp a number of the internet  related stocks
are now on, there will  ultimately be a day of reckoning when investors will ask
each company management, "What are you going to earn?". In the case of Netscape,
the original internet darling,  this has meant a stock price decline of 75%. Our
discipline is founded in fundamentals, because the market is grounded by them.
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                          Morningstar Ratings Revisited

         With 75% of all small-cap  growth mutual funds currently rated one-star
by  Morningstar,  we  thought it timely to  comment  on the  Morningstar  rating
process. To understand how one investment style can earn such a disproportionate
share of Morningstar's  lowest rating,  one needs to look at how the ratings are
calculated.

         Morningstar  ratings are based on risk  adjusted  performance  within a
broad asset class, e.g. U.S. equities,  U.S. fixed income.  Morningstar compares
each fund's monthly return results against  Treasury Bills and derives a measure
of risk (average  underperformance) and return (excess return). Monthly risk and
return  numbers  are  ranked  against  all other  funds in the  asset  class and
combined,  resulting in a risk adjusted relative performance ranking.  Stars are
assigned based on this relative  ranking.  For a domestic equity fund to receive
five stars, its risk adjusted  performance must be at the top of all U.S. equity
funds  that  Morningstar  tracks.  The point is that in U.S.  equity  funds,  no
distinction is made between  investment style categories like large-cap value or
small-cap growth.

         Over the past several years,  the large-cap growth sector of the market
has performed  tremendously  well,  with  relatively low levels of risk.  Stocks
outside of this universe have fared relatively poorly.  Consequently,  five-star
funds are heavily clustered in the large-cap growth category.  Conversely, fully
75% of Morningstar's  small-cap growth funds rate only one star when compared to
all other U.S. stock funds. Less than 10% of small-cap growth funds rate as high
as three stars, and none rate four stars or five stars.

         So  why  should  these  one-star  funds  be  a part  of  an  investment
portfolio?  Two reasons: future performance and risk diversification.

         There is ample  academic  evidence  that  the  past  performance  of an
investment  category is a poor predictor of its future  returns.  Yet 90% of all
new mutual fund money is invested in five-star and four-star funds whose returns
are based solely on their historical performance;  and currently,  most of these
funds are in the same category,  large-cap growth.  Thus, everyone is driving in
the same  direction,  but looking only in the  rear-view  mirror.  There is also
ample evidence that extraordinary performance of an investment category, good or
bad,  eventually  reverts  to its  average.  Thus,  now  more  than  usual,  the
historical  returns  of  these  currently  strong  performing  funds  may not be
indicative of their future returns.

         When one  considers the impact of star  dependence on  diversification,
the picture only gets worse. Diversification, combining different investments to
smooth out the bumps of their  individual  returns,  lowers average risk without
changing  average  returns.  But, there is no  diversification  if the different
investments all behave  similarly.  Owning several large-cap growth funds offers
limited  diversification benefit over owning one large-cap growth fund. However,
owning a large-cap fund, a small-cap fund, and an  international  fund can offer
more meaningful  diversification.  In today's environment,  with five-star funds
all  clustered in the U.S.  large-cap  growth  category,  a portfolio  comprised
solely of five-star  funds would be absent a significant  part of the investible
universe and thus forego important diversification opportunities.

         Successful  investors  remember  two things.  The first is to avoid the
trap of  piling  into  yesterday's  hot  investment  category  which  may not be
tomorrow's.  The second is to reap the rewards of  diversification  by combining
holdings that do not go up, or more importantly go down, for the same reasons.
<PAGE>

                     _____________________________________

                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
                     _____________________________________

                               September 30, 1998


Investment Strategy
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The  Chesapeake  Growth  Fund  seeks  capital  appreciation   primarily  through
investments in small, medium, and large growth equities.  The cornerstone of the
fund's intensive in-house  fundamental  analysis is in constant contact with the
management,  customers, competitors, and suppliers of both current and potential
investments.


Investment Guidelines
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fund seeks companies that:

  *  are  experiencing  a rapid  growth rate - companies  in our  portfolio  are
     forecasted to grow their profits in excess of 15% annually;

  *  are selling at a stock price not yet fully reflective of their growth rate;

  *  are undergoing  a positive  change created  by new  products,  managements,
     distribution strategies or manufacturing technologies;

  *  have a  strong  balance  sheet  and are less  susceptible to  macroeconomic
     change.


The Largest Industry Groups  [Represented by a Pie Chart in mailings]
- ----------------------------------

     Computers & Peripherals - 12.7%  
     Telecommunications - 9.4%
     Computer Software - 9.3%  
     Business Services - 9.1%  
     Energy Services - 6.9%
     Pharmaceuticals - 6.2% 
     Apparel - 6.0% 
     Healthcare Delivery - 5.3% 
     Retail Sales & Distribution - 5.1% 
     Bldg. Supplies/Housing Related - 4.2 %
     All Others - 25.6%  


About The Investment Advisor
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gardner Lewis Asset  management  serves as investment  advisor to the Chesapeake
Family of Funds.  Overall,  through the funds and separately  managed  accounts,
Gardner Lewis  invests  approximately  $2.6 billion in growth  equities for both
institutions and individuals including some of the top foundations,  endowments,
and pension  plans in the U.S.  Gardner  Lewis was founded in 1990 and employs a
staff of 29. The research team is comprised of 15.
<PAGE>

Ten Largest Holdings
- ----------------------------------------
1.  EMC Corporation                 5.6%
2.  MCI Worldco Inc.                4.2%
3.  Jones Apparel Group, Inc.       3.8%
4.  IMS Health Inc.                 3.5%
5.  Biomet, Inc.                    2.9%
6.  CalEnergy                       2.9%
7.  Sun Microsystems, Inc.          2.6%
8.  Mylan Laboratories              2.5%
9.  Federal-Mogul Corp.             2.5%
10. Accustaff Inc.                  2.3%


Portfolio Characteristics
- ----------------------------------------
Overall Assets ($MM)                 192
Number of Companies                   66
5 Yr. Historical Earnings Growth     30%
Earnings Growth - net year           28%
P/E Ratio - next year                 15
  (Gardner Lewis earnings estimates)


Performance Summary
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Period Ended                                          Since
  9/30/98               1 Year        3 Year        Inception
- -------------------------------------------------------------
The Chesapeake  
Growth Fund             -26.5%         0.3%           10.5% 
Series D
- -------------------------------------------------------------


Fund performance is net of the maximum 1.5% sales load.  Historical  performance
for The  Chesapeake  Growth  Fund  Series D has  been  calculated  by using  the
performance  of an  original  class  of The  Fund ( known as the B Shares ) from
inception on April , 1994 until the  conversion  into the new Series D Shares on
April 7, 1995. The performance  quoted  represents past performance and is not a
guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return will vary, so you
may have a gain or loss when you sell shares.


     For more complete information regarding The Fund including charges and
 expenses, obtain a prospectus by calling the Fund directly at (800)430-3863 or
    Gardner Lewis Asset Management, the Investment Advisor at (610)558-2800.

                Must be accompanied or preceded by a prospectus.
                  Capital Investment Group, Inc., Distributor
                           Raleigh, NC (800)525-3863
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

               _________________________________________________________________________________

                                         THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
               _________________________________________________________________________________


                                          PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
                                                 (unaudited)
                                             September 30, 1998

=====================================================    ======================================================
 Quantity  Security                     Market Value      Quantity  Security                      Market Value
=====================================================    ======================================================
   119,000 AES Corporation                 4,410,438        127,400 HCR Manor Care Inc.              3,734,413
   302,200 Accustaff Inc.                  4,457,450         44,700 Hertz Corp.                      1,871,813
   133,300 Adaptec, Inc.                   1,266,350        106,600 IMS Health Inc.                  6,602,538
    48,100 Airborne Freight Corp.            832,731        103,000 Integrated Health Service        1,731,688
    60,800 Allmerica Financial Corp.       3,625,200         67,100 Johns Manville Corp.               763,263
    96,200 American Power Conversion       3,625,538        313,900 Jones Apparel Group, Inc.        7,200,081
    65,800 Ascend Communications           2,993,900        148,500 K Mart Corp.                     1,782,000
    86,100 BE Aerospace, Inc.              1,894,200        161,800 MCI Worldcom Inc.                7,907,975
    64,600 BMC Software, Inc.              3,880,038         48,100 Maytag                           2,296,775
   157,600 Biomet, Inc.                    5,466,750         14,200 McKesson Corp.                   1,301,075
    70,900 Borders Group, Inc.             1,577,525         97,000 Micron Technology                2,952,438
    74,270 CKE Restaurants                 2,209,533        113,900 Mohawk Industries, Inc.          3,118,013
    84,850 Cable Design Technologies       1,081,838        163,700 Mylan Laboratories, Inc.         4,829,150
   189,800 Cabletron Systems               2,135,250        106,300 Networks Associates, Inc.        3,773,650
    70,900 Cadence Design Systems          1,812,381        108,400 Newbridge Networks Corp.         1,944,425
   205,100 CalEnergy                       5,435,150        121,500 Petrol Geo Service ADR           1,936,406
    69,200 Ceridian Corporation            3,970,350         48,100 Platinum Tech, Inc.                865,800
   100,400 Champion Enterprises            2,334,300        170,800 Rational Software Corp.          2,871,575
   162,000 Checkfree Holdings Corp.        1,599,750         77,100 Rite Aid Corporation             2,737,050
    77,600 Comair Holdings, Inc.           2,231,000         98,700 SCI Systems, Inc.                2,658,731
   182,300 DSP Communications, Inc.        1,503,975        101,300 Saks, Inc.                       2,272,919
   107,200 E C I Telecom, Ltd.             2,626,400         42,200 Southdown Inc.                   1,899,000
   184,400 EMC Corporation                10,579,950         50,600 Staples, Inc.                    1,486,375
   113,900 FORE Systems, Inc.              1,893,588         85,700 Sterling Software, Inc.          2,378,175
   116,500 Fairfield Communities           1,165,000         60,800 Suiza Foods                      1,900,000
   101,300 Federal-Mogul Corp.             4,735,775         97,900 Sun Microsystems, Inc.           4,876,644
   138,400 Flowers Industries, Inc.        3,018,850        130,350 Sunterra Corp.                     847,275
    32,900 Forest Laboratories, Inc.       1,130,938        458,700 Systems Software Associates, Inc.2,322,169
    59,700 Gateway 2000, Inc.              3,123,056         70,900 Warnaco Group, Inc.              1,639,563
   153,600 Genesis Health Ventures         1,881,600         88,400 Waste Management, Inc.           4,248,725
    94,500 Genzyme General Division        3,413,813         51,100 Wellpoint Health Networks Inc.   2,864,794
   132,500 Global Industries, Ltd.         1,532,031        252,700 Wolverine World Wide, Inc.       2,748,113
    53,200 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.      2,141,300


                                                                    TOTAL EQUITY                   190,423,926

                                                                    CASH EQUIVALENT                  1,530,108

                                                                    TOTAL ASSETS                   191,954,034
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

________________________________________________________________________________


                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

________________________________________________________________________________

                 a series of the Gardner Lewis Investment Trust






                             Semi-Annual Report 1998


                         FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31






                               INVESTMENT ADVISOR
                         Gardner Lewis Asset Management
                        285 Wilmington-West Chester Pike
                         Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania 19317



                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND
                           107 North Washington Street
                             Post Office Drawer 4365
                     Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27803-0365
                                 1-800-430-3863


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                    Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - 94.51%

       Aerospace & Defense - 2.07%
        (a) BE Aerospace, Inc. ...................................................                  92,300              $  1,920,994
        (a) Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation .....................................                  57,600                 2,023,200
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           3,944,194
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Apparel Manufacturing - 4.78%
        (a) Jones Apparel Group, Inc. ............................................                 299,800                 5,846,100
            Liz Claiborne, Inc. ..................................................                  29,600                   843,600
            The Warnaco Group, Inc. ..............................................                  88,300                 2,406,175
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           9,095,875
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Auto & Trucks - 0.89%
            Hertz Corporation ....................................................                  44,600                 1,683,650
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Auto Parts - Replacement Equipment - 3.07%
            Federal-Mogul Corporation ............................................                 109,400                 5,839,225
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Building Materials - 0.43%
            Southdown, Inc. ......................................................                  19,500                   823,875
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Commercial Services - 1.11%
        (a) Cendant Corporation ..................................................                 182,200                 2,106,687
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Computers - 10.07%
        (a) Adaptec, Inc. ........................................................                 144,100                 1,657,150
        (a) EMC Corporation ......................................................                 241,300                10,828,337
        (a) Gateway 2000, Inc. ...................................................                  59,300                 2,805,631
        (a) Sun Microsystems, Inc. ...............................................                  97,600                 3,867,400
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          19,158,518
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Computer Software & Services - 9.56%
        (a) BMC Software, Inc. ...................................................                  64,400                 2,724,925
        (a) Cadence Design Systems, Inc. .........................................                  77,300                 1,632,962
            Ceridian Corporation .................................................                  75,500                 3,661,750
            CheckFree Holdings Corporation .......................................                 170,800                 1,462,475
            IMS Health Incorporated ..............................................                 106,600                 5,863,000
        (a) Network Associates, Inc. .............................................                  50,600                 1,631,850
            System Software Associates, Inc. .....................................                 267,000                 1,201,500
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          18,178,462
                                                                                                                        ------------



                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                    Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Electronics - 2.72%
        (a) SCI Systems, Inc. ....................................................                 105,200              $  2,413,025
        (a) American Power Conversion Corporation ................................                 102,100                 2,756,700
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           5,169,725
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Electronics - Semiconductor - 0.61%
        (a) Novellus Systems, Inc. ...............................................                  43,400                 1,155,525
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Environmental Control - 2.16%
            Waste Management, Inc. ...............................................                  93,000                 4,103,625
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Financial Services - 1.22%
        (a) UniCapital Corporation ...............................................                 220,200                 2,312,100
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Food - Processing - 1.68%
        (a) Suiza Foods ..........................................................                  65,900                 3,187,913
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Food - Wholesale - 1.41%
            Flowers Industries, Inc. .............................................                 150,000                 2,671,875
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Foreign Securities - 2.59%
            ECI Telecommunications Limited .......................................                 116,900                 3,214,750
        (a) Petroleum Geo-Services - ADR .........................................                 131,200                 1,705,600
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           4,920,350
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Homebuilders - 1.34%
        (a) Champion Enterprises, Inc. ...........................................                 109,200                 2,552,550
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Household Products & Housewares - 1.15%
            Maytag Corporation ...................................................                  50,600                 2,182,125
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Human Resources - 1.25%
        (a) AccuStaff Incorporated ...............................................                  85,600                 1,070,000
        (a) Metamor Worldwide, Inc. ..............................................                  55,200                 1,311,000
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           2,381,000
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Industrial Materials - 0.68%
        (a) Cable Design Technologies ............................................                  92,450                 1,300,078
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Insurance - Multiline - 2.08%
            Allmerica Financial Corporation ......................................                  66,300                 3,953,138
                                                                                                                        ------------



                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                    Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Investment Trust - 1.08%
            CarrAmerica Realty Corporation .......................................                  91,600              $  2,061,000
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Lodging - 1.33%
        (a) Sunterra Corporation .................................................                 142,150                 1,306,003
        (a) Fairfield Communities, Inc. ..........................................                 124,900                 1,217,775
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           2,523,778
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Medical - Biotechnology - 1.62%
            Biogen, Inc. .........................................................                  45,200                 2,090,500
        (a) Genzyme Corporation (General Division) ...............................                  38,300                   986,225
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           3,076,725
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Medical - Hospital Management & Services - 5.30%
            Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation ..................................                  88,300                 1,992,269
        (a) Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. ........................................                 163,300                 1,939,187
        (a) HEALTHSOUTH Corporation ..............................................                  94,800                 1,795,275
            Integrated Health Services, Inc. .....................................                 111,200                 2,147,550
        (a) Wellpoint Health Networks, Inc. ......................................                  41,300                 2,204,388
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          10,078,669
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Medical Supplies - 2.23%
            Biomet, Inc. .........................................................                 157,600                 4,235,500
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Miscellaneous - Manufacturing - 1.42%
            AMETEK, Inc. .........................................................                 138,900                 2,708,550
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Oil & Gas - Equipment & Services - 1.35%
        (a) Global Industries Ltd. ...............................................                 235,100                 2,204,063
            Varco International, Inc. ............................................                  52,200                   371,925
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           2,575,988
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Pharmaceuticals - 4.22%
        (a) Forest Laboratories, Inc. ............................................                  34,900                 1,177,875
            Jones Pharma Incorporated ............................................                  94,000                 1,962,250
            Mylan Laboratories Inc. ..............................................                 174,100                 3,960,775
        (a) PharMerica, Inc. .....................................................                 239,000                   933,606
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           8,034,506
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Restaurants & Food Services - 1.32%
            CKE Restaurants, Inc. ................................................                  81,070                 2,513,170
                                                                                                                        ------------




                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                    Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Retail - Department Stores - 2.95%
        (a) Consolidated Stores Corporation ......................................                  89,856              $  2,830,464
        (a) Proffitt's, Inc. .....................................................                 108,800                 2,774,400
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           5,604,864
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Retail - General Merchandise - 1.09%
            Kmart Corporation ....................................................                 162,000                 2,065,500
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Retail - Specialty Line - 3.56%
        (a) Borders Group, Inc. ..................................................                  77,300                 1,463,869
            Pier 1 Imports, Inc. .................................................                 253,650                 2,504,794
        (a) Staples, Inc. ........................................................                 103,200                 2,799,300
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           6,767,963
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Shoes - Leather - 1.49%
            Wolverine World Wide, Inc. ...........................................                 269,400                 2,828,700
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Telecommunications - 2.02%
        (a) DSP Communications, Inc. .............................................                 191,300                 2,187,994
        (a) Newbridge Networks Corporation .......................................                  89,400                 1,659,487
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           3,847,481
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Textiles - 1.69%
        (a) Mohawk Industries, Inc. ..............................................                 299,800                 3,211,406
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Transportation - Air - 1.65%
            Airborne Freight Corporation .........................................                  51,300                 1,000,350
            Comair Holdings, Inc. ................................................                  83,700                 2,129,119
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           3,129,469
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Utilities - Electric - 4.79%
        (a) CalEnergy Company, Inc. ..............................................                 221,400                 5,631,862
            The AES Corporation ..................................................                 127,600                 3,477,100
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           9,108,962
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Utilities - Telecommunications - 3.47%
        (a) WorldCom, Inc. .......................................................                 161,300                 6,603,219
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Utilities - Water - 1.06%
        (a) United States Filter Corporation .....................................                 111,900                 2,014,200
                                                                                                                        ------------

            Total Common Stocks (Cost $203,828,055) ..............................                                       179,710,140
                                                                                                                        ------------




                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                    Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 5.66%

       Evergreen Money Market Treasury Institutional Money
            Market Fund Institutional Service Shares .............................               9,338,823              $  9,338,823
       Evergreen Money Market Treasury Institutional Treasury
            Money Market Fund Institutional Service Shares .......................               1,416,063                 1,416,063
                                                                                                                        ------------

            Total Investment Companies (Cost $10,754,886) ........................                                        10,754,886
                                                                                                                        ------------


Total Value of Investments (Cost $214,582,94% (b)) ........................................                100.17 %     $190,465,026
Liabilities In Excess of Other Assets .....................................................                 (0.17)%        (317,522)
                                                                                                           -------      ------------
       Net Assets .........................................................................                100.00 %     $190,147,504
                                                                                                           =======      ============



       (a)  Non-income producing investment.

       (b)  Aggregate  cost  for  financial reporting  and  federal  income  tax
            purposes  is the  same.  Unrealized  appreciation  (depreciation) of
            investments for financial reporting  and federal income tax purposes
            is as follows:


                 Unrealized appreciation                                                                               $ 26,842,894
                 Unrealized depreciation                                                                                (50,960,809)
                                                                                                                       ------------

                            Net unrealized depreciation                                                                $(24,117,915)
                                                                                                                       ============


       The following acronym is used in this portfolio:

                 ADR - American Depository Receipt






See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                 STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

ASSETS
       Investments, at value (cost $214,582,941) .....................................................                 $190,465,026
       Income receivable .............................................................................                       87,486
       Receivable for investments sold ...............................................................                      708,576
       Receivable for fund shares sold ...............................................................                      418,143
       Deferred organization expenses, net (note 3) ..................................................                        1,902
       Other assets ..................................................................................                          178
                                                                                                                       ------------

            Total assets .............................................................................                  191,681,311
                                                                                                                       ------------

LIABILITIES
       Accrued expenses ..............................................................................                       61,594
       Payable for investment purchases ..............................................................                    1,092,147
       Payable for fund shares redeemed ..............................................................                      344,151
       Disbursements in excess of cash on demand deposit .............................................                       35,915
                                                                                                                       ------------

            Total liabilities ........................................................................                    1,533,807
                                                                                                                       ------------

NET ASSETS ...........................................................................................                 $190,147,504
                                                                                                                       ============

NET ASSETS CONSIST OF
       Paid-in capital ...............................................................................                 $202,696,552
       Undistributed net realized gain on investments ................................................                   11,568,867
       Net unrealized depreciation on investments ....................................................                  (24,117,915)
                                                                                                                       ------------
                                                                                                                       $190,147,504
                                                                                                                       ============
INSTITUTIONAL SHARES
       Net asset value, redemption and offering price per share
            ($69,229,942 / 5,295,455 shares outstanding) ....................................................                $13.07
                                                                                                                             ======

SERIES A INVESTOR SHARES
       Net asset value, redemption and offering price per share
            ($24,594,367 / 1,902,888 shares outstanding) ....................................................                $12.92
                                                                                                                             ======
       Maximum offering price per share (100 / 97 of $12.92) ................................................                $13.32
                                                                                                                             ======

SERIES C INVESTOR SHARES
       Net asset value, redemption and offering price per share
            ($2,594,438 / 209,267 shares outstanding) .......................................................                $12.40
                                                                                                                             ======

SERIES D INVESTOR SHARES
       Net asset value, redemption and offering price per share
            ($7,112,111 / 559,457 shares outstanding) .......................................................                $12.71
                                                                                                                             ======
       Maximum offering price per share (100 / 98.5 of $12.71) ..............................................                $12.90
                                                                                                                             ======

SUPER-INSTITUTIONAL SHARES
       Net asset value, redemption and offering price per share
            ($86,616,646 / 6,599,065 shares outstanding) ....................................................                $13.13
                                                                                                                             ======




See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                       STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

                                                    Period ended August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)


INVESTMENT LOSS

       Income
            Dividends ......................................................................................           $    443,052
                                                                                                                       ------------

       Expenses
            Investment advisory fees (note 2) ..............................................................              1,314,777
            Fund administration fees (note 2) ..............................................................                 95,083
            Distribution fees - Series A (note 4) ..........................................................                 45,377
            Distribution fees - Series C (note 4) ..........................................................                 14,581
            Distribution fees - Series D (note 4) ..........................................................                 27,343
            Custody fees ...................................................................................                  6,619
            Registration and filing administration fees (note 2) ...........................................                 11,583
            Fund accounting fees (note 2) ..................................................................                 42,000
            Audit fees .....................................................................................                  4,500
            Legal fees .....................................................................................                 13,820
            Securities pricing fees ........................................................................                  2,404
            Shareholder administration fees ................................................................                 24,967
            Shareholder recordkeeping fees .................................................................                 18,100
            Shareholder servicing expenses .................................................................                  9,583
            Registration and filing expenses ...............................................................                 23,693
            Printing expenses ..............................................................................                  9,869
            Amortization of deferred organization expenses (note 3) ........................................                  6,734
            Trustee fees and meeting expenses ..............................................................                  4,561
            Other operating expenses .......................................................................                 10,285
                                                                                                                       ------------

                 Total expenses ............................................................................              1,685,879
                                                                                                                       ------------

                 Less:
                       Expense reimbursements - Super-Institutional Class (note 2) .........................                (11,915)
                       Expense reductions (note 6) .........................................................                (12,359)
                       Shareholder administration fees waived (note 2) .....................................                (12,500)
                                                                                                                       ------------

                 Net expenses ..............................................................................              1,649,105
                                                                                                                       ------------

                       Net investment loss .................................................................             (1,206,053)
                                                                                                                       ------------

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

       Net realized gain from investment transactions ......................................................              7,329,825
       Decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments ..................................................            (76,202,064)
                                                                                                                       ------------

            Net realized and unrealized loss on investments ................................................            (68,872,239)
                                                                                                                       ------------

                 Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations ......................................           $(70,078,292)
                                                                                                                       ============




See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                 STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Period ended        Year ended
                                                                                                        August 31,      February 28,
                                                                                                             1998              1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN NET ASSETS
        Operations
             Net investment loss ...............................................................     $ (1,206,053)     $ (2,437,229)
             Net realized gain from investment transactions ....................................        7,329,825        34,915,833
             (Decrease) increase in unrealized appreciation on investments .....................      (76,202,064)       22,557,525
                                                                                                     ------------      ------------
                 Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations ...............      (70,078,292)       55,036,129
                                                                                                     ------------      ------------
        Distributions to shareholders from
             Tax return of capital .............................................................                0        (7,366,935)
             Net realized gain from investment transactions ....................................                0       (26,747,385)
                                                                                                     ------------      ------------
                 Decrease in net assets resulting from distributions ...........................                0       (34,114,320)
                                                                                                     ------------      ------------
        Capital share transactions
             (Decrease) increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions (a) ...       (7,791,129)       15,554,185
                                                                                                     ------------      ------------
                      Total (decrease) increase in net assets ..................................      (77,869,421)       36,475,994
NET ASSETS
        Beginning of period ....................................................................      268,016,925       231,540,931
                                                                                                     ------------      ------------
        End of period ..........................................................................     $190,147,504      $268,016,925
                                                                                                     ============      ============


(a) A summary of capital share activity follows:
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           Period ended                         Year ended
                                                                         August 31, 1998                     February 28, 1998
                                                                     Shares            Value             Shares            Value
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -----------------------------------------------------
                  Institutional Shares
- -----------------------------------------------------
Shares sold .........................................                 633,833      $ 11,437,635         1,051,514      $ 19,879,652
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions .....                       0                 0           700,580        12,393,286
Shares redeemed .....................................                (537,544)       (9,543,477)       (1,340,894)      (23,569,381)
                                                                 ------------      ------------      ------------      ------------
        Net increase ................................                  96,289      $  1,894,158           411,200      $  8,703,557
                                                                 ============      ============      ============      ============
- -----------------------------------------------------
                    Series A Shares
- -----------------------------------------------------
Shares sold .........................................                  84,995      $  1,482,418           530,549      $  9,940,125
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions .....                       0                 0           285,571         5,008,907
Shares redeemed .....................................                (495,548)       (8,673,588)         (936,063)      (17,142,515)
                                                                 ------------      ------------      ------------      ------------
        Net decrease ................................                (410,553)     $ (7,191,170)         (119,943)     $ (2,193,483)
                                                                 ============      ============      ============      ============
- -----------------------------------------------------
                    Series C Shares
- -----------------------------------------------------
Shares sold .........................................                     116      $      2,000            51,400      $    892,071
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions .....                       0                 0            30,187           514,986
Shares redeemed .....................................                 (56,167)         (959,817)         (391,932)       (6,437,614)
                                                                 ------------      ------------      ------------      ------------
        Net decrease ................................                 (56,051)     $   (957,817)         (310,345)     $ (5,030,557)
                                                                 ============      ============      ============      ============
- -----------------------------------------------------
                    Series D Shares
- -----------------------------------------------------
Shares sold .........................................                   8,520      $    152,434            21,553      $    358,036
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions .....                       0                 0            81,859         1,418,612
Shares redeemed .....................................                (105,205)       (1,688,734)         (116,844)       (2,013,186)
                                                                 ------------      ------------      ------------      ------------
        Net decrease ................................                 (96,685)     $ (1,536,300)          (13,432)     $   (236,538)
                                                                 ============      ============      ============      ============
- -----------------------------------------------------
               Super-Institutional Shares
- -----------------------------------------------------
Shares sold .........................................                       0      $          0                 0      $          0
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions .....                       0                 0           806,720        14,311,206
Shares redeemed .....................................                       0                 0                 0                 0
                                                                 ------------      ------------      ------------      ------------
        Net increase ................................                       0      $          0           806,720      $ 14,311,206
                                                                 ============      ============      ============      ============
- -----------------------------------------------------
                      Fund Summary
- -----------------------------------------------------
Shares sold .........................................                 727,464      $ 13,074,487         1,655,016      $ 31,069,884
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions .....                       0                 0         1,904,917        33,646,997
Shares redeemed .....................................              (1,194,464)      (20,865,616)       (2,785,733)      (49,162,696)
                                                                 ------------      ------------      ------------      ------------
        Net (decrease) increase .....................                (467,000)     $ (7,791,129)          774,200      $ 15,554,185
                                                                 ============      ============      ============      ============

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                        FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                           (For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period)
                                                             (Unaudited)

                                                         Institutional Class

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                        For the
                                                                                                                    period from
                                                                                                                  April 6, 1994
                                                                 Period                                           (commencement
                                                                  ended    Year ended    Year ended    Year ended   of oper) to
                                                              August 31,  February 28,  February 28,  February 29,  February 28,    
                                                                   1998          1998          1997          1996          1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net asset value, beginning of period .......................   $  17.86      $  16.26      $  14.45     $   11.31      $  10.00

     Income from investment operations
       Net investment loss .................................      (0.08)        (0.15)        (0.13)        (0.05)        (0.04)
       Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on investments     (4.71)         4.22          1.94          3.38          1.35
                                                               --------      --------      --------      --------      --------

         Total from investment operations ..................      (4.79)         4.07          1.81          3.33          1.31
                                                               --------      --------      --------      --------      --------

     Distributions to shareholders from
       Net investment income ...............................       0.00          0.00          0.00         (0.11)         0.00
       Tax return of capital ...............................       0.00         (0.53)         0.00          0.00          0.00
       Net realized gain from investment transactions ......       0.00         (1.94)         0.00         (0.08)         0.00
                                                               --------      --------      --------      --------      --------

         Total distributions ...............................      (0.00)        (2.47)         0.00         (0.19)         0.00
                                                               --------      --------      --------      --------      --------

Net asset value, end of period .............................   $  13.07      $  17.86      $  16.26      $  14.45      $  11.31
                                                               ========      ========      ========      ========      ========

Total return (a) ...........................................     (26.80)%(d)    25.25 %       12.53 %       29.66 %       13.12 %(d)
                                                               ========      ========      ========      ========      ========

Ratios/supplemental data
     Net assets, end of period (000's) .....................   $ 69,230      $ 92,858      $ 77,858      $ 80,252      $ 15,088
                                                               ========      ========      ========      ========      ========     

     Ratio of expenses to average net assets
       Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .......       1.22 %(b)     1.19 %        1.23 %        1.65 %        2.75 %(b)
       After expense reimbursements and waived fees ........       1.20 %(b)     1.16 %        1.22 %        1.49 %        1.73 %(b)

     Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets
       Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .......      (0.88)%(b)    (0.90)%       (0.85)%       (0.98)%       (1.80)%(b)
       After expense reimbursements and waived fees ........      (0.86)%(b)    (0.88)%       (0.84)%       (0.82)%       (0.78)%(b)

     Portfolio turnover rate ...............................      49.24 %      105.60 %      126.44 %       99.33 %       64.92 %

     Average broker commission per share (c) ...............    $0.0588      $ 0.0576      $ 0.0600          --            --



(a)  Total return does not reflect payment of a sales charge.
(b)  Annualized.
(c)  Represents total commissions paid on portfolio  securities divided by total
     portfolio shares purchased or sold on which commissions were charged. 
(d)  Aggregate return. Not annualized.


See accompanying notes to financial statements                                                                           (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                        FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                           (For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period)
                                                             (Unaudited)

                                                      Super-Institutional Class

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                        For the
                                                                                                                    period from
                                                                                                                  June 12, 1996
                                                                                                               (commencement of
                                                                         Period ended           Year ended       operations) to
                                                                            August 31,         February 28,         February 28,
                                                                                 1998                 1998                 1997     
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net asset value, beginning of period ..............................          $  17.92             $  16.29             $  15.53

     Income from investment operations
       Net investment loss ........................................             (0.06)               (0.12)               (0.07)
       Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on investments .....             (4.73)                4.22                 0.83
                                                                             --------             --------             --------

         Total from investment operations .........................             (4.79)                4.10                 0.76
                                                                             --------             --------             --------

     Distributions to shareholders from
       Net investment income ......................................             (0.00)                0.00                 0.00
       Tax return of capital ......................................              0.00                (0.53)                0.00
       Net realized gain from investment transactions .............              0.00                (1.94)                0.00
                                                                             --------             --------             --------

         Total distributions ......................................              0.00                (2.47)                0.00
                                                                             --------             --------             --------

Net asset value, end of period ....................................          $  13.13             $  17.92             $  16.29
                                                                             ========             ========             ========

Total return (a) ..................................................            (26.77)%(d)           25.40 %               4.89 %(d)
                                                                             ========             ========             ========

Ratios/supplemental data
     Net assets, end of period (000's) ............................          $ 86,617             $118,246             $ 94,340
                                                                             ========             ========             ========

     Ratio of expenses to average net assets
       Before expense reimbursements and waived fees ..............              1.06 %(b)            1.06 %               1.08 %(b)
       After expense reimbursements and waived fees ...............              1.04 %(b)            1.04 %               1.04 %(b)

     Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets
       Before expense reimbursements and waived fees ..............             (0.72)%(b)           (0.77)%              (0.75)%(b)
       After expense reimbursements and waived fees ...............             (0.70)%(b)           (0.75)%              (0.72)%(b)

     Portfolio turnover rate ......................................             49.24 %             105.60 %             126.44 %

     Average broker commission per share (c) ......................          $ 0.0588             $ 0.0576             $ 0.0600



(a)  Total return does not reflect payment of a sales charge.
(b)  Annualized.
(c)  Represents total commissions paid on portfolio  securities divided by total
     portfolio shares purchased or sold on which commissions were charged. 
(d)  Aggregate return. Not annualized.


See accompanying notes to financial statements                                                                           (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                          THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                             FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                               (For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period)
                                                                 (Unaudited)

                                                              Investor Series A

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                        For the
                                                                                                                    period from
                                                                                                                  April 7, 1995
                                                                                                                  (commencement
                                                                Period ended       Year ended       Year ended      of oper) to
                                                                   August 31,     February 28,     February 28,     February 29,    
                                                                        1998             1998             1997             1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net asset value, beginning of period ..........................     $  17.69         $  16.18         $  14.42         $  11.79

     Income from investment operations
        Net investment income loss ............................        (0.12)           (0.21)           (0.18)           (0.06)
        Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on investments         (4.65)            4.19             1.94             2.88
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

            Total from investment operations ..................        (4.77)            3.98             1.76             2.82
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

     Distributions to shareholders from
        Net investment income .................................        (0.00)            0.00             0.00            (0.11)
        Tax return of capital .................................         0.00            (0.53)            0.00             0.00
        Net realized gain from investment transactions ........         0.00            (1.94)            0.00            (0.08)
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

            Total distributions ...............................        (0.00)           (2.47)            0.00            (0.19)
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

Net asset value, end of period ................................     $  12.92         $  17.69         $  16.18         $  14.42
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

Total return (a) ..............................................       (26.95)%(d)       24.80 %          12.21 %          23.86 %(d)
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

Ratios/supplemental data
     Net assets, end of period (000's) ........................     $ 24,594         $ 40,924         $ 39,376         $ 32,549
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

     Ratio of expenses to average net assets
        Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .........         1.59 %(b)        1.55 %           1.54 %           1.88 %(b)
        After expense reimbursements and waived fees ..........         1.57 %(b)        1.52 %           1.53 %           1.71 %(b)

     Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets
        Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .........        (1.26)%(b)       (1.27)%          (1.16)%          (1.20)%(b)
        After expense reimbursements and waived fees ..........        (1.24)%(b)       (1.24)%          (1.15)%          (1.04)%(b)

     Portfolio turnover rate ..................................        49.24 %         105.60 %         126.44 %          99.33 %

     Average broker commission per share (c) ..................     $ 0.0588         $ 0.0576         $ 0.0600              --



(a)  Total return does not reflect payment of a sales charge.
(b)  Annualized.
(c)  Represents total commissions paid on portfolio  securities divided by total
     portfolio shares purchased or sold on which commissions were charged. 
(d)  Aggregate return. Not annualized.


See accompanying notes to financial statements                                                                           (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                        FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                           (For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period)
                                                             (Unaudited)

                                                          Investor Series C

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                        For the
                                                                                                                    period from
                                                                                                                  April 7, 1995
                                                                                                                  (commencement
                                                                Period ended       Year ended       Year ended      of oper) to
                                                                   August 31,     February 28,     February 28,     February 29,    
                                                                        1998             1998             1997             1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net asset value, beginning of period ..........................     $  17.12         $  15.97         $  14.34         $  11.79

     Income from investment operations
        Net investment income loss ............................        (0.29)           (0.52)           (0.29)           (0.12)
        Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on investments         (4.43)            4.14             1.92             2.86
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

            Total from investment operations ..................        (4.72)            3.62             1.63             2.74
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

     Distributions to shareholders from
        Net investment income .................................        (0.00)            0.00             0.00            (0.11)
        Tax return of capital .................................         0.00            (0.53)            0.00             0.00
        Net realized gain from investment transactions ........         0.00            (1.94)            0.00            (0.08)
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

            Total distributions ...............................         0.00            (2.47)            0.00            (0.19)
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

Net asset value, end of period ................................     $  12.40         $  17.12         $  15.97         $  14.34
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

Total return (a) ..............................................       (27.65)%(d)       22.95 %          11.30 %          23.18 %(d)
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

Ratios/supplemental data
     Net assets, end of period (000's) ........................     $  2,594         $  4,541         $  9,192         $  7,908
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

     Ratio of expenses to average net assets
        Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .........         3.42 %(b)        3.11 %           2.34 %           2.38 %(b)
        After expense reimbursements and waived fees ..........         3.40 %(b)        3.05 %           2.33 %           2.18 %(b)

     Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets
        Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .........        (3.08)%(b)       (2.84)%          (1.97)%          (1.77)%(b)
        After expense reimbursements and waived fees ..........        (3.06)%(b)       (2.78)%          (1.96)%          (1.57)%(b)

     Portfolio turnover rate ..................................        49.24 %         105.60 %         126.44 %          99.33 %

     Average broker commission per share (c) ..................     $ 0.0588         $ 0.0576         $ 0.0600              --



(a)  Total return does not reflect payment of a sales charge.
(b)  Annualized.
(c)  Represents total commissions paid on portfolio  securities divided by total
     portfolio shares purchased or sold on which commissions were charged. 
(d)  Aggregate return. Not annualized.


See accompanying notes to financial statements                                                                           (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                     THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                                                        FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                           (For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period)
                                                             (Unaudited)

                                                          Investor Series D

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                        For the
                                                                                                                    period from
                                                                                                                  April 7, 1995
                                                                                                                  (commencement
                                                                Period ended       Year ended       Year ended      of oper) to
                                                                   August 31,     February 28,     February 28,     February 29,    
                                                                        1998             1998             1997             1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net asset value, beginning of period ..........................     $  17.45         $  16.09         $  14.41         $  11.79

     Income from investment operations
        Net investment income loss ............................        (0.18)           (0.32)           (0.29)           (0.11)
        Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on investments         (4.56)            4.15             1.97             2.92
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

            Total from investment operations ..................        (4.74)            3.83             1.68             2.81
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

     Distributions to shareholders from
        Net investment income .................................        (0.00)            0.00             0.00            (0.11)
        Tax return of capital .................................         0.00            (0.53)            0.00             0.00
        Net realized gain from investment transactions ........         0.00            (1.94)            0.00            (0.08)
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

            Total distributions ...............................        (0.00)           (2.47)            0.00            (0.19)
                                                                    --------         --------         --------         --------

Net asset value, end of period ................................     $  12.71         $  17.45         $  16.09         $  14.41
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

Total return (a) ..............................................       (27.15)%(d)       24.06 %          11.59 %          23.77 %(d)
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

Ratios/supplemental data
     Net assets, end of period (000's) ........................     $  7,112         $ 11,448         $ 10,774         $ 11,929
                                                                    ========         ========         ========         ========

     Ratio of expenses to average net assets
        Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .........         2.18 %(b)        2.22 %           2.02 %           2.13 %(b)
        After expense reimbursements and waived fees ..........         2.16 %(b)        2.18 %           2.01 %           1.73 %(b)

     Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets
        Before expense reimbursements and waived fees .........        (1.84)%(b)       (1.94)%          (1.64)%          (1.54)%(b)
        After expense reimbursements and waived fees ..........        (1.82)%(b)       (1.89)%          (1.63)%          (1.14)%(b)

     Portfolio turnover rate ..................................        49.24 %         105.60 %         126.44 %          99.33 %

     Average broker commission per share (c) ..................     $ 0.0588         $ 0.0576         $ 0.0600              --



(a)  Total return does not reflect payment of a sales charge.
(b)  Annualized.
(c)  Represents total commissions paid on portfolio  securities divided by total
     portfolio shares purchased or sold on which commissions were charged. 
(d)  Aggregate return. Not annualized.


See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 August 31, 1998
                                   (Unaudited)


NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND OTHER INFORMATION

         The  Chesapeake  Growth  Fund  (the  "Fund"),  formerly  known  as  The
         Chesapeake  Fund prior to November 1, 1997, is a diversified  series of
         shares of  beneficial  interest of the Gardner Lewis  Investment  Trust
         (the "Trust"). The Trust, an open-end investment company, was organized
         on August 12, 1992 as a Massachusetts  Business Trust and is registered
         under the Investment  Company Act of 1940, (the "Act") as amended.  The
         Fund began operations on April 6, 1994. The investment objective of the
         Fund is to seek  capital  appreciation  through  investments  in equity
         securities  of medium and large  capitalization  companies,  consisting
         primarily of common and  preferred  stocks and  securities  convertible
         into  common  stocks.  Pursuant  to a plan  approved  by the  Board  of
         Trustees of the Trust,  the existing single class of shares of the Fund
         was redesignated as the Institutional Shares of the Fund on February 3,
         1995, and three new classes of shares - Series A, Series C and Series D
         Investor Shares (the "Investor  Shares") were  authorized.  On April 7,
         1995, Series A, Series C and Series D Investor Shares became effective.
         The Board of  Trustees  of the Trust  approved on May 2, 1996 a plan to
         authorize a new class of shares designated as the Super-  Institutional
         Shares.  On  June  12,  1996,  the  Super-Institutional  Shares  became
         effective. The Institutional Shares and Super-Institutional  Shares are
         offered to institutional  investors  without a sales charge and bear no
         distribution  and service fees. The Investor  Shares are offered with a
         sales charge (except for Series C Shares) at different  levels and bear
         distribution fees at different levels.

         Each class of shares has equal rights as to assets of the Fund, and the
         classes are  identical  except for  differences  in their sales  charge
         structures, ongoing distribution and service fees, and various expenses
         that can be attributed to specific  class  activity.  Income,  expenses
         (other than  distribution  and service fees,  which are attributable to
         each class of Investor  Shares based upon a set  percentage  of its net
         assets,  and other  expenses  which can be  traced  to  specific  class
         activity),  and realized and unrealized  gains or losses on investments
         are  allocated  to each  class of shares  based upon its  relative  net
         assets.  All  classes  have  equal  voting  privileges  since the Trust
         shareholders vote in the aggregate,  not by fund or class, except where
         otherwise required by law or when the Board of Trustees determines that
         the matter to be voted on affects  only the  interests  of a particular
         fund or class.  The  following is a summary of  significant  accounting
         policies followed by the Fund.

         A.    Security  Valuation - The Fund's  investments  in securities  are
               carried at value. Securities listed on an exchange or quoted on a
               national  market system are valued at the last quoted sales price
               as of 4:00  p.m.  New York  time on the day of  valuation.  Other
               securities  traded  in the  over-the-counter  market  and  listed
               securities for which no sale was reported on that date are valued
               at the  most  recent  bid  price.  Securities  for  which  market
               quotations are not readily available, if any, are valued by using
               an  independent  pricing  service  or  by  following   procedures
               approved by the Board of  Trustees.  Short-term  investments  are
               valued at cost which approximates value.

         B.    Federal  Income  Taxes - No  provision  has been made for federal
               income  taxes  since it is the policy of the Fund to comply  with
               the  provisions  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code  applicable  to
               regulated   investment   companies   and   to   make   sufficient
               distributions  of taxable  income to relieve it from all  federal
               income taxes.

               Net investment income (loss) and net realized  gains (losses) may
               differ for financial  statement and income tax purposes primarily
               because of losses  incurred  subsequent  to October 31, which are
               deferred for income tax purposes.  The character of distributions
               made during the year from net  investment  income or net realized
               gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal
               income  tax  purposes.  Also,  due  to  the  timing  of  dividend
               distributions,  the fiscal year in which amounts are  distributed
               may differ from the year that the income or  realized  gains were
               recorded by the Fund.

                                                                     (Continued)
<PAGE>

                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 August 31, 1998
                                   (Unaudited)



         C.    Investment Transactions - Investment transactions are recorded on
               the trade date.  Realized gains and losses are  determined  using
               the  specific  identification  cost  method.  Interest  income is
               recorded daily on an accrual basis.  Dividend  income is recorded
               on the ex-dividend date.

         D.    Distributions  to  Shareholders - The Fund may declare  dividends
               annually,  generally  payable on a date  selected  by the Trust's
               Trustees.  Distributions  to  shareholders  are  recorded  on the
               ex-dividend date. In addition, distributions may be made annually
               in November out of net realized gains through  October 31 of that
               year. The Fund may make a supplemental distribution subsequent to
               the end of its fiscal year.

         E.    Use of Estimates - The  preparation  of financial  statements  in
               conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires
               management  to make  estimates  and  assumptions  that affect the
               amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in
               the financial statements.  Actual results could differ from those
               estimates.


NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

         Pursuant  to an  investment  advisory  agreement,  Gardner  Lewis Asset
         Management (the "Advisor")  provides the Fund with a continuous program
         of supervision of the Fund's assets,  including the  composition of its
         portfolio,  and furnishes  advice and  recommendations  with respect to
         investments,   investment  policies,  and  the  purchase  and  sale  of
         securities.  As compensation  for its services,  the Advisor receives a
         fee at the annual rate of 1.00% of the Fund's average daily net assets.

         The   Fund's    administrator,    The    Nottingham    Company,    (the
         "Administrator"),  provides administrative services to and is generally
         responsible for the overall management and day-to-day operations of the
         Fund pursuant to an accounting  and  administrative  agreement with the
         Trust. As compensation for its services,  the Administrator  receives a
         fee at the annual  rate of 0.075% of the  average  daily net assets for
         the  Institutional  Shares  and for  Series A,  Series C, and  Series D
         Investor  Shares.  The  Administrator  also  receives a monthly  fee of
         $1,750 for the  Institutional  Shares  and for Series A,  Series C, and
         Series D Investor Shares for accounting and recordkeeping services. The
         contract with the  Administrator  provides that the aggregate  fees for
         the   aforementioned   administration,   accounting  and  recordkeeping
         services  shall not be less than  $3,000 per month.  The  Administrator
         receives a fee at the annual rate of 0.015% of average daily net assets
         for shareholder  administration  costs. The Administrator  also charges
         the Fund for certain  expenses  involved  with the daily  valuation  of
         portfolio securities.  The Administrator currently intends to reimburse
         expenses   of   the   Super-Institutional    Class   to   limit   total
         Super-Institutional  Class operating  expenses to 1.045% of the average
         daily net  assets of that  class.  There can be no  assurance  that the
         foregoing voluntary expense reimbursements will continue.

         Capital Investment Group, Inc. (the "Distributor") serves as the Fund's
         principal  underwriter and  distributor.  The Distributor  receives any
         sales charges imposed on purchases of shares and re-allocates a portion
         of such charges to dealers  through whom the sale was made, if any. For
         the period  ended  August 31,  1998,  the  Distributor  retained  sales
         charges in the amount of $1,660.

                                                                     (Continued)
<PAGE>

                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 August 31, 1998
                                   (Unaudited)


         NC Shareholder  Services,  LLC (the "Transfer Agent") has been retained
         by the Administrator to serve as the Fund's transfer,  dividend paying,
         and  shareholder  servicing  agent.  The Transfer  Agent  maintains the
         records of each shareholder's  account,  answers shareholder  inquiries
         concerning  accounts,  processes  purchases  and  redemptions  of  Fund
         shares,  acts  as  dividend  and  distribution  disbursing  agent,  and
         performs other shareholder  servicing functions.  The Transfer Agent is
         compensated for its services by the  Administrator  and not directly by
         the Fund.

         Certain  Trustees  and  officers  of the  Trust  are also  officers  or
         directors of the Advisor or the Administrator.


NOTE 3 - DEFERRED ORGANIZATION EXPENSES

         Expenses  totaling $66,799 incurred in connection with its organization
         and the registration of its shares have been assumed by the Fund.

         The  organization  expenses are being  amortized over a period of sixty
         months. Investors purchasing shares of the Fund bear such expenses only
         as they are amortized against the Fund's investment income.


NOTE 4 - DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICE FEES

         The Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not
         "interested  persons"  of the Trust as  defined  in the Act,  adopted a
         distribution  plan with respect to all Investor Shares pursuant to Rule
         12b-1 of the Act (the "Plan"). Rule 12b-1 regulates the manner in which
         a regulated  investment  company may assume costs of  distributing  and
         promoting  the sales of its shares  and  servicing  of its  shareholder
         accounts.

         The Plan provides that the Fund may incur certain costs,  which may not
         exceed 0.25%, 0.75% and 0.50% per annum of the average daily net assets
         of Series A, Series C and Series D Investor Shares,  respectively,  for
         each year elapsed  subsequent  to adoption of the Plan,  for payment to
         the  Distributor  and others for items  such as  advertising  expenses,
         selling  expenses,  commissions,  travel or other  expenses  reasonably
         intended to result in sales of  Investor  Shares of the Fund or support
         servicing of shareholder accounts.

         The Fund  incurred  $45,377,  $14,581 and $27,343 in  distribution  and
         service  fees  under the Plan with  respect  to Series A,  Series C and
         Series D Investor Shares, respectively, for the period ended August 31,
         28, 1998.


NOTE 5 - PURCHASES AND SALES OF INVESTMENTS

         Purchases and sales of investments  other than  short-term  investments
         aggregated $122,342,872 and $136,482,545  respectively,  for the period
         ended August 31, 1998.


NOTE 6 - EXPENSE REDUCTIONS

         The Advisor has transacted  certain  portfolio  trades with brokers who
         paid a portion of the fund's expenses.  For the period ended August 31,
         1998,   the  Fund's   expenses  were  reduced  by  $24,274  under  this
         arrangement.
<PAGE>





________________________________________________________________________________


                           THE CHESAPEAKE GROWTH FUND

________________________________________________________________________________


                 a series of the Gardner Lewis Investment Trust




















                        This Report has been prepared for
                     shareholders and may be distributed to
                    others only if preceded or accompanied by
                              a current prospectus.

<PAGE>

             _____________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
             _____________________________________________________


                                                        October 1, 1998




Dear Shareholder:

         The Chesapeake  Aggressive  Growth Fund closed the third quarter with a
loss of 29.3%.  This loss compares to losses of 9.9%,  22.7%,  and 20.1% for the
S&P 500, Nasdaq Industrials, and Russell 2000, respectively,  and leaves us down
22.5% year-to-date.  Negative news revolving around everything from Japanese and
Russian  economic  turmoil to the White House  scandal has  heightened  investor
nervousness,  and in  turn,  market  volatility.  As if these  problems  are not
enough,  the  bankruptcy  of several  hedge  funds and the  well-publicized  Fed
orchestrated  bailout  of Long  Term  Capital  Management  have  further  fueled
anxiety.

         The market's sell-off has been both broad and steep, our portfolio's to
a  greater  degree.  We are  disappointed  with  our  relative  performance  and
attribute it primarily to three things. Most importantly,  we underestimated the
impact that global  concerns  would have on investor  sentiment as it relates to
U.S. retail.  In addition,  the recent  disruption of capital markets created an
inability  for a number of our  companies  to raise  the  funds  needed to fully
execute their aggressive growth plans. Finally, we miscalculated the risk to the
healthcare industry's ability to profit under the government's new reimbursement
plan.

         Most  of the  damage  to  the  market  was  done  in  August,  and  the
preponderance  to smaller  stocks.  The  Russell  2000 was off over 30% from its
April high as compared to the S&P 500 which was off less than 20% from its high.
We  attribute  this  difference  to a lack of trading  liquidity in the smallest
names as price  insensitive  selling ran into buyers reluctant to commit capital
in this  volatile  tape.  At the end of  August,  almost 20% of the names in the
Russell 2000 were down 60% or more from their  highs,  almost half were down 40%
or more, and 75% were down more than 25%. Selling was truly universal in smaller
stocks.

         Macroeconomic  concerns  acted as fuel for this  sell-off as  investors
attempted to project  implications of an uncertain  global economic  environment
against a benign domestic  environment.  Interest rates are low and falling, and
inflation  remains  dormant with  commodity  prices  hitting new lows.  Balanced
against this are the possible  implications of global weakness to U.S. corporate
profits.  Nervousness  about what might happen has driven  investors'  decisions
over the past weeks more than any measurable or real change in the macroeconomic
state.  Problems  in  Russia  illustrate  this  important  distinction.   Though
virtually insignificant as a part of the global economy, with trade representing
less  than 1% of U.S.  gross  domestic  product,  Russian  turmoil  provided  an
emotional  catalyst  that sparked a change in investor  psychology.  Problems in
Asia have far more  fundamental  weight,  and  perhaps it was a lack of positive
change in that region that heightened  investor  nervousness.  The point is that
current  nervousness  is about  what  could  happen,  not what did happen in the
business environment.

<PAGE>


         Since the  beginning of August,  we have logged more than 1500 contacts
with our investment companies, their customers,  competitors and suppliers in an
effort to  quantify  true  business  prospects,  rather than  conjectured  ones.
Further, we have been diligent in our attempts to quantify risks associated with
the most  negative  of  global  macroeconomic  scenarios  as they  relate to our
investment companies.  Our companies are smaller,  less globally oriented,  more
proprietary in their  businesses,  and have earnings that are far less sensitive
to  macroeconomic  change than the typical  larger  company.  In the universe of
giant  multinationals,  selling has been based on the  reasonable  concern  that
future corporate profits may not be able to justify current  valuations.  In the
smaller company universe, selling has been far less fundamentally based.

         We believe a number of developments can turn current market  sentiment.
From a macroeconomic perspective they are a credible reform package for Japan, a
clear direction for the resolution of the White House scandal,  the abatement of
tax related selling which is now severe in small and mid-sized stocks,  and to a
lesser  degree  further  action  on the  part  of the  Federal  Reserve.  From a
microeconomic perspective, it is company earnings. What is important here is not
a complete  resolution  to these  issues,  but a belief on the part of investors
that things will begin to improve.

         This  point  is most  clearly  evidenced  when  studying  the  market's
activity  surrounding  the  Persian  Gulf War.  The best time to invest  was not
January 17th,  the day U.S.  planes began to bomb,  but instead in the middle of
October when the Press was exaggerating the strength of the Republican Guard. In
our  case,  we  would  have  missed  a  portfolio  rally  of 30% had we  waited.
Fortunately,  our discipline precludes us from so doing. And,  ironically,  many
investors  even  missed the late  winter  move  because  they  wanted a complete
resolution to the war before  committing  funds.  By the time the war had ended,
our portfolio  return had further  accelerated  far surpassing its initial gain,
and the S&P 500 had  appreciated 21% from its low. The point is that markets are
anticipatory, thus it is direction that moves them. Conclusion is too late.

         From our  perspective,  the  macroeconomic  issues are being addressed,
with the  Japanese  situation  being the most  tenuous.  Thus,  we believe  that
earnings  should  finally  begin to command an  increasingly  larger  portion of
investor  attention.  In fact,  this  may  already  be  happening.  With  recent
pre-announcements by some of this market's seemingly bulletproof companies, like
Coca-Cola,  Gillette, and Disney, we have seen commensurate compression in their
stock prices.  This makes fundamental sense,  because it is these companies that
rely heavily on foreign sales or traffic for their continued growth.

         Why these price  corrections did not take place sooner is probably more
related to psychology  than anything  else.  Last winter,  as market  volatility
increased over Asian economic concerns, investors sought safe-haven in household
names;  but,  now  that  the  effects  of Asia and the  other  economies  it has
contaminated  are being  felt,  investors  are in a  position  to see its actual
impact and can therefore  adjust their  portfolios  accordingly.  This is why we
long ago concluded  that earnings and valuation are critical and why they should
once again assume their role of historic importance.

         Despite the market's  recent  correction,  larger  companies  are still
trading at price-earnings  multiples that are historically somewhat high, though
some would argue  justifiably  so, given the interest rate  environment.  On the
other hand, in the same interest rate environment, smaller companies are trading
at historically low multiples and at unprecedented  multiples relative to larger
ones. Our portfolio now trades at 12 times forward  earnings that are growing at
over 30%. The S&P 500 now trades at 21 times  forward  earnings that are growing
at perhaps  6%. We have found  price-earnings  multiples  as low as those now in
smaller  stocks in only a handful of modern  periods.  During the  mini-crash of
October 1997,  multiples  were not this low;  during Iraq's  invasion of Kuwait,
multiples  bottomed at these levels;  during the crash of 1987, they bottomed at
these levels;  and, through the mid-seventies  bear market,  they reached levels
lower than these, though with much higher interest rates and inflation.
<PAGE>

         In previous periods of great market turmoil,  we have found some of our
best  opportunities as bottoms up fundamental  stockpickers.  It typically takes
some  time for the dust to settle  and the  market  to sort  through  companies'
fundamental prospects in order to differentiate those that sold off for rational
reasons from those that were simply  caught in the  downdraft.  Some of our best
results  in the past  have  been  derived  coming  out of these  types of market
environments.  We feel that our investment  discipline puts us one step ahead of
most market participants in these rebuilding phases, and are busy evaluating the
opportunities currently presented.

Sincerely,



W. Whitfield Gardner                                 John L. Lewis, IV
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                               Portfolio Spotlight          September 30, 1998

         Because recent market  activity has been centered around macro economic
events, most of our portfolio's short-term performance can be explained by them.
Nevertheless,  there have been two  significant  longer-term  investment  trends
whose  participating  companies  you  may  have  noticed  under-weighted  in our
portfolio.  The first and most  influential  has been the benefit of a declining
interest  rate  environment  on a  consolidating  financial  services  industry.
Greater  involvement  in financial  services  would have helped our  performance
dramatically  over the past  couple of years,  as it did the indices to which we
compare.  The second trend has been the speculation  surrounding the development
of  the  internet.  Internet  related  companies,  although  not  a  significant
weighting in any benchmark, have garnered a great deal of investor attention and
significantly  benefited  those exposed to them. We thought it important that we
address both trends.

         Until  recently,  as interest rates  declined,  interest rate sensitive
instruments including equities like banks, utilities, and real estate investment
trusts benefited tremendously.  Additionally,  these companies wanting some form
of earnings  growth,  and fueled by higher stock prices,  initiated  acquisition
strategies that further elevated prices in the group. Where we could participate
by investing in companies with more estimable  profits,  we did. But, given that
the businesses of many of these  companies  were highly  susceptible to interest
rate  fluctuations  and had  unacceptably  low growth rates,  we passed over the
majority.  The net result of this  interest rate movement was that the financial
services  sector  accounted for more than half of the performance of the Russell
2000 and one third of that of the Russell  Midcap,  from the  beginning  of 1996
until quarter end. Most dramatic was that smaller bank stocks had five times the
average   return  of  the  Russell  2000.   During  this  period,   we  averaged
significantly  less  exposure to the financial  services  group than the Russell
indices.  We continue to feel strongly that the  managements of the companies we
invest in should have more control over their companies' earnings prospects, and
that  relying on an  interest  rate  decline,  or a  takeover,  for stock  price
appreciation violates one of the major tenants of our investment discipline.  We
will  continue to invest in the growing  number of financial  institutions  that
have taken steps to insulate  themselves from interest rate risk, allowing their
managements better control of profit generation.

         As to the  internet,  we,  like  others,  believe  it will be a  viable
vehicle  for  commerce  and where  practical  are  participating  in its growth.
Unfortunately,  the  general  excitement  surrounding  it has caused many of its
related  companies'  stock prices to come public and then trade at  astronomical
valuations. Most of these companies are yet to produce a profit and will not for
some time. Thus, evaluating their worth is very difficult.  Tangentially,  cable
stocks have been beneficiaries of this internet boom, but they too carry much of
their current valuation for speculative reasons, such as assumed  consolidation,
rather than  measurable  ones, like strong profit growth.  For this reason,  the
only viable approach within our discipline has been to participate through those
companies  helping to build the equipment that makes the internet work and whose
sales and profits are estimable.  Nevertheless, it has been the concept-oriented
companies that have been the strongest performers.

         We have seen this pattern repeated  before,  where the concept precedes
the reality. For instance,  this is the second run for the cable companies whose
fortunes had reversed  approximately a decade ago when investors panicked out of
their  stocks as they came to  realize  that  fundamentals  were far  behind the
excitement.  And just a few years  ago this  same  phenomenon  was  repeated  in
cellular stocks when investors grew to understand that remote mountain locations
did not have the  population  to support  operators'  aggressive  infrastructure
builds. These industries make it, but few in the originally anticipated form. It
takes longer,  is more costly,  more  competitive,  and less  profitable than at
first thought.  Thus,  despite the ramp a number of the internet  related stocks
are now on, there will  ultimately be a day of reckoning when investors will ask
each company management, "What are you going to earn?". In the case of Netscape,
the original internet darling,  this has meant a stock price decline of 75%. Our
discipline is founded in fundamentals, because the market is grounded by them.
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                          Morningstar Ratings Revisited

         With 75% of all small-cap  growth mutual funds currently rated one-star
by  Morningstar,  we  thought it timely to  comment  on the  Morningstar  rating
process. To understand how one investment style can earn such a disproportionate
share of Morningstar's  lowest rating,  one needs to look at how the ratings are
calculated.

         Morningstar  ratings are based on risk  adjusted  performance  within a
broad asset class, e.g. U.S. equities,  U.S. fixed income.  Morningstar compares
each fund's monthly return results against  Treasury Bills and derives a measure
of risk (average  underperformance) and return (excess return). Monthly risk and
return  numbers  are  ranked  against  all other  funds in the  asset  class and
combined,  resulting in a risk adjusted relative performance ranking.  Stars are
assigned based on this relative  ranking.  For a domestic equity fund to receive
five stars, its risk adjusted  performance must be at the top of all U.S. equity
funds  that  Morningstar  tracks.  The point is that in U.S.  equity  funds,  no
distinction is made between  investment style categories like large-cap value or
small-cap growth.

         Over the past several years,  the large-cap growth sector of the market
has performed  tremendously  well,  with  relatively low levels of risk.  Stocks
outside of this universe have fared relatively poorly.  Consequently,  five-star
funds are heavily clustered in the large-cap growth category.  Conversely, fully
75% of Morningstar's  small-cap growth funds rate only one star when compared to
all other U.S. stock funds. Less than 10% of small-cap growth funds rate as high
as three stars, and none rate four stars or five stars.

         So  why  should  these  one-star  funds  be  a part  of  an  investment
portfolio?  Two reasons: future performance and risk diversification.

         There is ample  academic  evidence  that  the  past  performance  of an
investment  category is a poor predictor of its future  returns.  Yet 90% of all
new mutual fund money is invested in five-star and four-star funds whose returns
are based solely on their historical performance;  and currently,  most of these
funds are in the same category,  large-cap growth.  Thus, everyone is driving in
the same  direction,  but looking only in the  rear-view  mirror.  There is also
ample evidence that extraordinary performance of an investment category, good or
bad,  eventually  reverts  to its  average.  Thus,  now  more  than  usual,  the
historical  returns  of  these  currently  strong  performing  funds  may not be
indicative of their future returns.

         When one  considers the impact of star  dependence on  diversification,
the picture only gets worse. Diversification, combining different investments to
smooth out the bumps of their  individual  returns,  lowers average risk without
changing  average  returns.  But, there is no  diversification  if the different
investments all behave  similarly.  Owning several large-cap growth funds offers
limited  diversification benefit over owning one large-cap growth fund. However,
owning a large-cap fund, a small-cap fund, and an  international  fund can offer
more meaningful  diversification.  In today's environment,  with five-star funds
all  clustered in the U.S.  large-cap  growth  category,  a portfolio  comprised
solely of five-star  funds would be absent a significant  part of the investible
universe and thus forego important diversification opportunities.

         Successful  investors  remember  two things.  The first is to avoid the
trap of  piling  into  yesterday's  hot  investment  category  which  may not be
tomorrow's.  The second is to reap the rewards of  diversification  by combining
holdings that do not go up, or more importantly go down, for the same reasons.
<PAGE>

             _______________________________________________________

                      THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND
             _______________________________________________________

                               September 30, 1998


Investment Strategy                                                             
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The  Chesapeake  Aggressive  Growth Fund seeks  capital  appreciation  primarily
through investments in small and medium growth equities.  The cornerstone of the
fund's  intensive  in-house  fundamental  analysis is constant  contact with the
management,  customers, competitors, and suppliers of both current and potential
investments.                                                                    
                                                                                
                                                                                
Investment Guidelines                                                           
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fund seeks companies that:                                                  
                                                                                
 * are  experiencing  a  rapid  growth  rate - companies in  our  portfolio  are
   forecasted to grow their profits in excess of 20% annually:                  
                                                                                
 * are  selling at a stock price not yet fully  reflective of their growth rate:
                                                                                
 * are  undergoing  a  positive  change  created  by new products,  managements,
   distribution strategies or manufacturing technologies:                       
                                                                                
 * have a strong balance sheet and are less susceptible to macroeconomic change.
                                                                                
                                                                                
The Largest Industry Groups [Represented by a Pie Chart in mailings]            
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Computer Software - 10.3%                                            
     Healthcare Delivery - 9.2%                                           
     Retail Sales & Distribution - 9.0%                                   
     Business Services - 6.9%                                             
     Financial Services - 6.2%                                            
     Apparel  - 5.7%                                                      
     Telecommunications  -  5.6%                                          
     Food  &  Restaurants  - 5.3%                                        
     Transportation - 4.9%                                                
     Medical Products - 4.8%                                              
     All Others - 32.3%                                                   


About The Investment Advisor                                                    
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gardner Lewis Asset  management  serves as investment  advisor to the Chesapeake
Family of Funds.  Overall,  through the funds and separately  managed  accounts,
Gardner Lewis  invests  approximately  $2.6 billion in growth  equities for both
institutions and individuals including some of the top foundations,  endowments,
and pension  plans in the U.S.  Gardner  Lewis was founded in 1990 and employs a
staff of 29. The research team is comprised of 15.                              
<PAGE>

Ten Largest Holdings
- ----------------------------------------
1.    Jones Apparel Group, Inc.     4.4%
2.    CalEnergy                     3.1%
3.    Biomet, Inc.                  3.1%
4.    Waste Management, inc.        2.8%
5.    BMC Software, Inc.            2.7%
6.    Access Health, Inc.           2.3%
7.    Federal-Mogul Corp.           2.2%
8.    EMC Corporation               2.2%
9.    Converse Technology, Inc.     2.0%
10.   Ceridian Corporation          2.0%


Portfolio Characteristics
- ---------------------------------------
Overall Assets ($MM)                352
Number of Companies                  92
5 Yr. Historical Earnings Growth    30%
Earnings Growth - net year          31%
P/E Ratio - next year                12
  (Gardner Lewis earnings estimates)


Performance Summary
- ----------------------------------------------------------------

- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Period Ended                                         Since
  9/30/98         1 Year     3 Year     5 Year     Inception
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
The Chesapeake    
  Aggressive      -36.2%     -5.7%       7.8%        10.6%
 Growth Fund
- ----------------------------------------------------------------


Fund  performance is net of the maximum 3% sales load. The inception date of the
Fund was January 4, 1993. The performance quoted represents past performance and
is not a guarantee of future  results.  Share price and  investment  return will
vary, so you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares.


     For more complete information regarding The Fund including charges and
 expenses, obtain a prospectus by calling the Fund directly at (800)430-3863 or
    Gardner Lewis Asset Management, the Investment Advisor at (610)558-2800.

               Must be accompanied or proceeded by a prospectus.
                  Capital Investment Group, Inc., Distributor
                           Raleigh, NC (800)525-3863
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                             _______________________________________________

                                  THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND
                             _______________________________________________



                                         PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
                                                (unaudited)
                                            September 30, 1998

==================================================   =================================================
Quantity      Security               Market Value     Quantity     Security              Market Value
==================================================   =================================================
  212,100 Access Health, Inc.           7,821,188       107,800 InaCom Corp.                2,034,725
  117,000 Airborne Freight Corp.        2,025,563       170,400 Integrated Health Service   2,864,850
   70,000 Alliant Techsystems, Inc.     4,637,500       269,200 JDA Software Group, Inc,    3,718,325
   94,000 American Buildings Corp.      2,209,000       129,800 JLG Industries              2,052,463
  155,500 American Capital Strategies   2,517,156       662,700 Jones Apparel Group, Inc.  15,200,681
  133,200 American Power Conversion     5,019,975       151,800 Jones Pharma Inc.           4,364,250
  264,500 Americredit Corp.             6,447,188       132,600 King World Productions      3,464,175
  405,400 Amkor Technology Inc.         1,976,325       230,200 Learning Company, Inc.      4,560,838
  180,200 Anixter International, Inc.   2,804,363        64,600 Medical Manager Corp.       1,477,725
  271,100 Apple South, Inc.             3,015,988        92,800 Metamor Worldwide, Inc.     2,552,000
  169,300 BE Aerospace, Inc.            3,724,600       142,600 Michaels Stores, Inc.       3,636,300
  152,400 BMC Software, Inc.            9,153,525       197,400 Novacare, Inc.                579,863
   75,700 Barnes & Noble, Inc.          2,043,900        65,800 Outback Steakhouse, Inc.    1,735,475
   99,200 Biomatrix, Inc.               3,868,800       342,400 PSS World Medical, Inc.     6,334,400
  304,500 Biomet, Inc.                 10,562,344       271,300 Personnel Group America,Inc.3,340,381
  233,100 Borders Group, Inc.           5,186,475       268,400 Petrol Geo Service ADR      4,277,625
  234,300 Building One Services Corp.   2,899,463        98,000 Quadramed Inc.              1,972,250
  172,300 CKE Restaurants               5,125,925       276,800 Rainforest Cafe, Inc.       1,851,100
   27,100 CMAC Investment Corp.         1,178,850       147,900 Renal Care Group, Inc.      3,789,938
  207,450 Cable Design Technologies     2,644,988       181,400 Richfood Holdings, Inc.     2,789,025
  183,300 Cadence Design Systems        4,685,606       224,900 Roberts Pharmaceutical      4,301,213
  403,200 CalEnergy                    10,684,800       175,300 SCI Systems, Inc.           4,722,144
  318,800 Cash America International    3,546,650       178,500 SDL, Inc.                   2,231,250
  350,300 CellStar Corp.                1,510,669        82,900 SEI Investments Company     5,761,550
  157,800 Central Garden & Pet Co.      2,919,300       207,500 SLI, Inc.                   3,203,281
  119,700 Ceridian Corporation          6,867,788       213,000 Saks, Inc.                  4,779,188
  497,400 Checkfree Holdings Corp.      4,911,825       319,900 Sirrom Capital Corp.        1,239,613
  209,187 Comair Holdings, Inc.         6,014,126       191,900 Smart Modular Tech.         3,945,944
  172,040 Comverse Technology, Inc.     7,032,135        62,100 Splash Tech. Holding Inc.     884,925
  167,400 Cotelligent Group, Inc.       2,939,963       173,700 Stage Stores, Inc.          2,116,969
  179,800 DSP Communications, Inc.      1,483,350       137,600 Sterling Commerce, Inc.     4,764,400
  157,500 Dan River, Inc.               1,732,500       118,800 Sunrise Assisted Living     4,076,325
  206,700 E C I Telecom, Ltd.           5,064,150       280,800 Sunterra Corp.              1,825,200
  129,300 EMC Corporation               7,418,588       914,850 Systems Software Assoc.,Inc.4,631,428
  128,500 Elder-Beerman Stores Corp.    2,232,688       172,200 Terex Corp.                 2,572,238
  288,975 Encore Wire Corp.             2,673,019        85,500 Trans World Music           1,560,375
  205,400 Fairfield Communities         2,054,000       103,100 TriQuint Semiconductor      1,585,163
  159,000 Federal-Mogul Corp.           7,433,250       299,900 Tricom, ADS                 1,836,888
  152,700 FirstPlus Financial Group,Inc.1,794,225       162,600 Trigon Healthcare, Inc.     5,040,600
   35,000 Flextronics International     1,240,313       152,000 Tristar Aerospace Co.       1,463,000
  220,500 Genesis Health Ventures       2,701,125        91,000 Triumph Group, Inc.         2,707,250
  117,500 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.    4,729,375        99,500 U.S.Foodservice             4,141,688
   46,000 Healthcare Financial Partners 1,932,000        94,400 Wang Laboratories, Inc.     1,829,000
  143,500 Hollywood Entertainment Corp. 1,955,188       132,300 Warnaco Group, Inc.         3,059,438
   36,700 ICON plc                      1,197,338       203,900 Waste Management, Inc.      9,799,944
   75,400 IMS Health Inc.               4,670,088        85,500 Wet Seal, Inc.              1,480,219


                                                                TOTAL EQUITY              344,442,783

                                                                CASH EQUIVALENT             7,782,638

                                                                TOTAL ASSETS              352,225,421
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

________________________________________________________________________________


                            THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE
                                   GROWTH FUND

________________________________________________________________________________


                 a series of the Gardner Lewis Investment Trust






                               Annual Report 1998


                         FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31






                               INVESTMENT ADVISOR
                         Gardner Lewis Asset Management
                        285 Wilmington-West Chester Pike
                         Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania 19317



                      THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND
                           107 North Washington Street
                             Post Office Drawer 4365
                     Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27803-0365
                                 1-800-430-3863


<PAGE>

                     THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                    Performance Update - $25,000 Investment

                      For the period from January 4, 1993
                 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 1998


                The Chesapeake                  NASDAQ             S&P 500 Total
            Aggressive Growth Fund         Industrial Index        Return Index

  1/4/93            24,250                      25,000                25,000
 2/28/93            24,066                      24,231                25,562
 5/31/93            26,474                      25,487                26,006
 8/31/93            28,765                      26,299                27,113
11/30/93            30,203                      27,207                27,200
 2/28/94            35,797                      29,006                27,692
 5/31/94            32,132                      25,932                27,265
 8/31/94            33,489                      26,804                28,596
11/30/94            34,520                      26,291                27,485
 2/28/95            36,044                      27,028                29,731
 5/31/95            40,252                      28,814                32,769
 8/31/95            51,058                      33,547                34,730
11/30/95            48,684                      33,945                37,649
 2/29/96            46,152                      35,224                40,048
 5/31/96            51,084                      41,492                42,088
 8/31/96            44,517                      36,875                41,234
11/30/96            49,643                      39,196                48,008
 2/28/97            50,735                      38,562                50,526
 5/31/97            54,207                      39,944                54,468
 8/31/97            62,831                      45,251                57,995
11/30/97            60,932                      44,105                61,865
 2/28/98            64,010                      46,280                68,212
 5/31/98            62,182                      47,037                71,182
 8/31/98            42,652                      34,279                62,689


This graph depicts the  performance  of The  Chesapeake  Aggressive  Growth Fund
versus the NASDAQ  Industrials  Index and the S&P 500 Total Return Index.  It is
important to note that The Chesapeake Aggressive Growth Fund is a professionally
managed  mutual fund while the indices are not available for  investment and are
unmanaged. The comparison is shown for illustrative purposes only.


Average Annual Total Return

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Since Inception      One Year      Five Years  
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
No Sales Load             10.50%           (32.12)%        8.19%
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
With 3% Sales Load         9.90%           (34.15)%        7.54%
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------


The graph  assumes an initial  $25,000  investment  at January 4, 1993  ($24,250
after maximum sales load of 3%). All dividends and distributions are reinvested.

At August 31,  1998,  the Fund  would  have grown to $42,652 - total  investment
return of 70.61% since January 4, 1993.  Without the deduction of the 3% maximum
sales load,  the Fund would have grown to $43,971 - total  investment  return of
75.89% since January 4, 1993.  The sales load may be reduced or  eliminated  for
larger purchases.

At August 31, 1998, a similar  investment in the NASDAQ  Industrials Index would
have grown to $34,279 - total investment return of 37.12% since January 4, 1993;
while a similar investment in the S&P 500 Total Return Index would have grown to
$62,689 - total investment return of 150.76% since January 4, 1993.

Past  performance  is not a guarantee of future  results.  A mutual fund's share
price and investment return will vary with market conditions,  and the principal
value of shares,  when  redeemed,  may be worth  more or less than the  original
cost.  Average  annual total  returns are  historical  in nature and measure net
investment income and capital gain or loss from portfolio  investments  assuming
reinvestment of dividends.

<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                           Value
                                                                                                   Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - 96.00%

       Aerospace & Defense - 4.83%
            Alliant Techsystems Inc. ...........................................                    80,000              $  5,250,000
            BE Aerospace, Inc. .................................................                   182,100                 3,789,956
        (a) Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation ...................................                   117,500                 4,127,188
        (a) TriStar Aerospace Co. ..............................................                   167,000                 1,398,625
        (a) Triumph Group, Inc. ................................................                   101,000                 3,282,500
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          17,848,269
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Apparel Manufacturing - 5.49%
        (a) Jones Apparel Group, Inc. ..........................................                   656,300                12,797,850
        (a) Littlefield, Adams & Company .......................................                     4,663                    17,486
            Liz Claiborne, Inc. ................................................                    67,800                 1,932,300
            The Warnaco Group, Inc. ............................................                   204,100                 5,561,725
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          20,309,361
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Auto Parts - Original Equipment - 2.29%
            Federal-Mogul Corporation ..........................................                   159,000                 8,486,625
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Commercial Services - 3.89%
        (a) Ceridian Corporation ...............................................                   119,700                 5,805,450
        (a) Consolidated Capital Corporation ...................................                   263,400                 3,391,275
        (a) Sterling Commerce, Inc. ............................................                   156,800                 5,174,400
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          14,371,125
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Computers - 2.45%
        (a) EMC Corporation ....................................................                   129,300                 5,802,338
        (a) Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. ...................................                   217,100                 3,256,500
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           9,058,838
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Computer Software & Services - 10.40%
        (a) BMC Software, Inc. .................................................                   151,000                 6,389,187
        (a) Cadence Design Systems, Inc. .......................................                   181,600                 3,836,300
        (a) CheckFree Holdings Corporation .....................................                   246,800                 2,113,225
        (a) Cotelligent Group, Inc. ............................................                   177,400                 2,017,925
        (a) Hyperion Solutions Corporation .....................................                    67,200                 1,881,600
        (a) IMS Health Incorporated ............................................                    75,400                 4,147,000
        (a) JDA Software Group, Inc. ...........................................                   286,600                 3,439,200
        (a) Mentor Graphics Corporation ........................................                   270,500                 1,876,594
        (a) QuadraMed Corporation ..............................................                   108,300                 2,572,125
        (a) System Software Associates, Inc. ...................................                   675,850                 3,041,325
        (a) The Learning Company, Inc. .........................................                   276,500                 4,890,594
        (a) Wang Laboratories, Inc. ............................................                   116,200                 2,265,900
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          38,470,975
                                                                                                                        ------------



                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                           Value
                                                                                                   Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Electrical Equipment - 1.76%
        (a) Encore Wire Corporation ............................................                   318,975              $  3,349,238
        (a) SLI, Inc. ..........................................................                   230,500                 3,169,375
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           6,518,613
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Electronics - 2.12%
        (a) American Power Conversion Corp. ....................................                   133,200                 3,596,400
        (a) California Micro Devices Corporation ...............................                    23,806                    46,124
        (a) SCI Systems, Inc. ..................................................                   183,100                 4,199,856
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           7,842,380
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Electronics - Semiconductor - 3.75%
        (a) Adaptec, Inc. ......................................................                   292,200                 3,360,300
        (a) Amkor Technology, Inc. .............................................                   485,400                 2,244,975
        (a) Novellus Systems, Inc. .............................................                    85,700                 2,281,762
        (a) SDL, Inc. ..........................................................                   236,400                 4,018,800
        (a) TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. .......................................                   127,800                 1,948,950
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          13,854,787
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Engineering & Construction - 0.69%
        (a) American Buildings Company .........................................                    94,000                 2,538,000
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Environmental Control - 2.43%
        (a) Waste Management, Inc. .............................................                   203,900                 8,997,088
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Financial - Consumer Credit - 2.84%
        (a) AmeriCredit Corp. ..................................................                   281,700                 7,024,894
        (a) FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. ....................................                   152,700                 3,464,381
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          10,489,275
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Financial Services - 2.76%
            American Capital Strategies, Ltd. ..................................                   185,500                 2,202,813
            CMAC Investment Corporation ........................................                    27,100                 1,043,350
            SEI Investments Company ............................................                    82,900                 5,160,525
            Sirrom Capital Corporation .........................................                   319,900                 1,779,444
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          10,186,132
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Food - Wholesale - 1.60%
            Richfood Holdings, Inc. ............................................                   287,500                 5,911,719
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Foreign - 2.83%
            ECI Telecommunications Limited .....................................                   205,100                 5,640,250
        (a) ICON plc - ADR .....................................................                    36,700                   977,137
            Petroleum GeoServices - ADR ........................................                   295,100                 3,836,300
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          10,453,687
                                                                                                                        ------------



                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                           Value
                                                                                                   Shares                 (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Human Resources - 1.52%
        (a) Metamor Worldwide, Inc. ............................................                    92,800              $  2,204,000
        (a) Personnel Group of America, Inc. ...................................                   301,300                 3,408,456
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           5,612,456
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Lodging - 1.62%
        (a) Fairfield Communities, Inc. ........................................                   293,600                 2,862,600
        (a) Sunterra Corporation ...............................................                   340,800                 3,131,100
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           5,993,700
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Machine - Construction & Mining - 1.75%
            JLG Industries, Inc. ...............................................                   234,000                 3,436,875
        (a) Terex Corporation ..................................................                   193,400                 3,046,050
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           6,482,925
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Medical Supplies - 2.21%
            Biomet, Inc. .......................................................                   304,500                 8,183,437
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Medical - Hospital Management & Service - 7.67%
        (a) Access Health, Inc. ................................................                   232,100                 5,555,894
        (a) Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. ......................................                   247,200                 2,935,500
        (a) HEALTHSOUTH Corporation ............................................                   204,100                 3,865,144
            Integrated Health Services, Inc. ...................................                   201,700                 3,895,331
        (a) Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc. ...................................                   167,900                 1,196,287
        (a) PSS World Medical, Inc. ............................................                   382,400                 5,879,400
        (a) Trigon Healthcare, Inc. ............................................                   182,600                 5,044,325
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          28,371,881
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Miscellaneous - Manufacturing - 0.00%
        (a) Wilshire Technologies,Warrants, expires 11/28/2002 .................                    11,956                         0
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Oil & Gas - 0.51%
        (a) Friede Goldman International Inc. ..................................                   179,800                 1,876,662
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Pharmaceuticals - 3.17%
        (a) Barr Laboratories, Inc. ............................................                   138,500                 3,549,062
            Jones Pharma Incorporated ..........................................                   206,500                 4,310,688
        (a) Roberts Pharmaceutical Corporation .................................                   224,900                 3,851,412
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          11,711,162
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Real Estate Investment Trust - 0.25%
            CarrAmerica Realty Corporation .....................................                    41,000                   922,500
                                                                                                                        ------------



                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                   Shares                  (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Restaurants & Food Service - 3.80%
            Apple South, Inc. ..................................................                   331,100              $  3,807,650
            CKE Restaurants, Inc. ..............................................                   172,300                 5,341,300
        (a) Outback Steakhouse, Inc. ...........................................                    70,900                 2,131,431
        (a) Rainforest Cafe, Inc. ..............................................                   336,800                 2,778,600
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          14,058,981
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Retail - Apparel - 1.84%
        (a) Stage Stores, Inc. .................................................                   213,700                 2,230,494
        (a) The Wet Seal, Inc. .................................................                   198,500                 4,565,500
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           6,795,994
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Retail - Department Stores - 2.73%
        (a) Consolidated Stores Corporation ....................................                   148,684                 4,683,546
        (a) Proffitt's, Inc. ...................................................                   213,000                 5,431,500
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          10,115,046
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Retail - Specialty Line - 4.67%
        (a) Barnes & Noble .....................................................                    58,600                 1,582,200
        (a) Borders Group, Inc. ................................................                   233,100                 4,414,331
            Cash America International, Inc. ...................................                   348,800                 4,229,200
        (a) Genesis Direct, Inc. ...............................................                    70,000                   201,250
        (a) Michaels Stores, Inc. ..............................................                   157,600                 3,703,600
        (a) The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. .....................................                   128,500                 2,007,813
        (a) Trans World Entertainment Corporation ..............................                    67,000                 1,139,000
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          17,277,394
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Telecommunications - 2.06%
        (a) DSP Communications, Inc. ...........................................                   199,800                 2,285,213
        (a) Scandinavian Broadcasting System SA ................................                   140,200                 3,119,450
        (a) TRICOM, S.A ........................................................                   332,600                 2,224,262
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           7,628,925
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Telecommunications Equipment - 2.65%
        (a) Cable Design Technologies ..........................................                   227,450                 3,198,516
        (a) Comverse Technology, Inc. ..........................................                   172,040                 6,623,540
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           9,822,056
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Textiles - 0.70%
        (a) Dan River Inc. .....................................................                   197,500                 2,579,844
                                                                                                                        ------------

       Transportation - Air - 2.06%
            Airborne Freight Corporation .......................................                   117,000                 2,281,500
            COMAIR Holdings, Inc. ..............................................                   209,187                 5,321,194
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                           7,602,694
                                                                                                                        ------------
       Utilities - Electric - 3.27%
        (a) CalEnergy Company, Inc. ............................................                   475,300                12,090,444
                                                                                                                        ------------



                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                   Shares                  (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Wholesale & Distribution - Specialty Line - 3.39%
        (a) Anixter International Inc. .........................................                   220,200              $  3,578,250
        (a) CellStar Corporation ...............................................                   511,400                 3,388,025
        (a) Central Garden and Pet Company .....................................                   192,800                 2,723,300
        (a) Inacom Corporation .................................................                   147,800                 2,854,388
                                                                                                                        ------------
                                                                                                                          12,543,963
                                                                                                                        ------------

            Total Common Stocks (Cost $406,616,508) ............................                                         355,006,938
                                                                                                                        ------------

INVESTMENT COMPANY - 5.21%

       Evergreen Money Market Treasury Institutional Money .....................                19,279,931                19,279,931
            Market Fund Institutional Service Shares                                                                    ------------
            (Cost $19,279,931)


Total Value of Investments (Cost $425,896,439 (b)) ..........................................            101.21 %      $374,286,869
Liabilities In Excess of Other Assets .......................................................             (1.21)%        (4,483,277)
                                                                                                         ------        ------------
       Net Assets ...........................................................................            100.00 %      $369,803,592
                                                                                                         ======        ============




       (a)  Non-income producing investment.

       (b)  Aggregate cost  for federal  income tax  purposes  is  $426,055,432.
            Unrealized  appreciation  (depreciation) of investments  for federal
            income tax purposes is as follows:



            Unrealized appreciation                                                                                    $ 46,833,695
            Unrealized depreciation                                                                                     (98,602,258)
                                                                                                                       ------------

                            Net unrealized depreciation                                                                $(51,768,563)
                                                                                                                       ============


       The following acronym is used throughout this portfolio:

            ADR - American Depository Receipt




See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                 STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

                                                           August 31, 1998


ASSETS
       Investments, at value (cost $425,896,439) .....................................................                 $374,286,869
       Income receivable .............................................................................                      241,569
       Receivable for investments sold ...............................................................                    2,940,312
       Receivable for fund shares sold ...............................................................                        8,423
       Other assets ..................................................................................                       16,823
                                                                                                                       ------------

            Total assets .............................................................................                  377,493,996
                                                                                                                       ------------

LIABILITIES
       Accrued expenses ..............................................................................                       38,299
       Payable for investment purchases ..............................................................                    7,611,805
       Disbursements in excess of cash on demand deposit .............................................                       40,300
                                                                                                                       ------------

            Total liabilities ........................................................................                    7,690,404
                                                                                                                       ------------

NET ASSETS
       (applicable to 27,795,867 shares outstanding; unlimited
        shares of no par value beneficial interest authorized) .......................................                 $369,803,592
                                                                                                                       ============

NET ASSET VALUE AND REDEMPTION PRICE PER SHARE
       ($369,803,592 / 27,795,867 shares) ............................................................                      $ 13.30
                                                                                                                       ============

OFFERING PRICE PER SHARE
       (100 / 97% of $13.30) .........................................................................                      $ 13.71
                                                                                                                       ============

NET ASSETS CONSIST OF
       Paid-in capital ...............................................................................                 $394,754,659
       Undistributed net realized gain on investments ................................................                   26,658,503
       Net unrealized depreciation on investments ....................................................                  (51,609,570)
                                                                                                                       ------------
                                                                                                                       $369,803,592
                                                                                                                       ============









See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                       STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

                                                     Year ended August 31, 1998



INVESTMENT LOSS

       Income
            Dividends ..................................................................................             $    1,435,506
                                                                                                                     --------------


       Expenses
            Investment advisory fees (note 2) ..........................................................                  7,337,649
            Fund administration fees (note 2) ..........................................................                    535,138
            Custody fees ...............................................................................                     26,420
            Registration and filing administration fees (note 2) .......................................                      6,862
            Fund accounting fees (note 2) ..............................................................                     21,000
            Audit fees .................................................................................                     13,650
            Legal fees .................................................................................                      6,073
            Securities pricing fees ....................................................................                      6,115
            Shareholder recordkeeping fees .............................................................                     13,893
            Shareholder administrative fees (note 2) ...................................................                     50,000
            Shareholder servicing expenses .............................................................                     79,033
            Registration and filing expenses ...........................................................                     14,215
            Printing expenses ..........................................................................                     29,598
            Amortization of deferred organization expenses .............................................                      3,446
            Trustee fees and meeting expenses ..........................................................                      6,990
            Other operating expenses ...................................................................                     44,363
                                                                                                                     --------------

                 Total expenses ........................................................................                  8,194,445
                                                                                                                     --------------

                       Net investment loss .............................................................                 (6,758,939)
                                                                                                                     --------------

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

       Net realized gain from investment transactions ..................................................                 38,364,114
       Decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments ..............................................               (211,160,640)
                                                                                                                     --------------

            Net realized and unrealized loss on investments ............................................               (172,796,526)
                                                                                                                     --------------

                 Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations ..................................             $ (179,555,465)
                                                                                                                     ==============









See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                 STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Year ended          Year ended
                                                                                                      August 31,          August 31,
                                                                                                           1998                1997
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(DECREASE) INCREASE  IN NET ASSETS

     Operations
         Net investment loss ....................................................                  $ (6,758,939)       $ (6,082,087)
         Net realized gain from investment transactions .........................                    38,364,114          72,981,586
         (Decrease) increase in unrealized appreciation on investments ..........                  (211,160,640)        114,457,604
                                                                                                   ------------        ------------

              Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations ...                  (179,555,465)        181,357,103
                                                                                                   ------------        ------------

     Distributions to shareholders from
         Net realized gain from investment transactions .........................                   (78,304,241)        (28,932,671)
                                                                                                   ------------        ------------

     Capital share transactions
         Increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions (a) ...                    14,174,396             756,974
                                                                                                   ------------        ------------

                   Total (decrease) increase in net assets ......................                  (243,685,310)        153,181,406

NET ASSETS

     Beginning of year ..........................................................                   613,488,902         460,307,496
                                                                                                   ------------        ------------

     End of year ................................................................                  $369,803,592        $613,488,902
                                                                                                   ============        ============



(a) A summary of capital share activity follows:
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Year ended                              Year ended
                                                                    August 31, 1998                         August 31, 1997

                                                               Shares              Value               Shares             Value
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shares sold ..................................                2,928,296        $ 59,641,139           3,447,946        $ 64,609,895
Shares issued for reinvestment
     of distributions ........................                3,755,172          74,389,963           1,565,933          26,934,053
                                                           ------------        ------------        ------------        ------------

                                                              6,683,468         134,031,102           5,013,879          91,543,948

Shares redeemed ..............................               (6,228,186)       (119,856,706)         (4,938,898)        (90,786,974)
                                                           ------------        ------------        ------------        ------------

     Net increase ............................                  455,282        $ 14,174,396              74,981        $    756,974
                                                           ============        ============        ============        ============






See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                                                        FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                            (For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Year)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Year ended     Year ended     Year ended     Year ended     Year ended
                                                             August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     August 31,
                                                                  1998           1997           1996           1995           1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net asset value, beginning of year ......................      $ 22.44        $ 16.88        $ 20.70        $ 13.58        $ 11.86

      Income (loss) from investment operations
           Net investment loss ..........................        (0.24)         (0.22)         (0.18)         (0.15)         (0.05)
           Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on       
               investments                                       (6.02)          6.84          (2.53)          7.27           1.98
                                                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

               Total from investment operations .........        (6.26)          6.62          (2.71)          7.12           1.93
                                                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

      Distributions to shareholders from
           Net investment income ........................        (0.00)          0.00           0.00           0.00          (0.16)
           Net realized gain from investment transactions        (2.88)         (1.06)         (1.11)          0.00          (0.05)
                                                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

               Total distributions ......................        (2.88)         (1.06)         (1.11)          0.00          (0.21)
                                                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

Net asset value, end of year ............................      $ 13.30        $ 22.44        $ 16.88        $ 20.70        $ 13.58
                                                          ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Total return (a) ........................................       (32.12)%        41.14 %       (12.81)%        52.45 %        16.42 %
                                                          ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Ratios/supplemental data

      Net assets, end of year ........................... $369,803,592   $613,488,902   $460,307,496   $460,286,044   $179,222,758
                                                          ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

      Ratio of expenses to average net assets
           Before expense reimbursements and waived fees          1.40 %         1.42 %         1.42 %         1.43 %         1.57 %
           After expense reimbursements and waived fees           1.40 %         1.42 %         1.42 %         1.43 %         1.49 %

      Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets
           Before expense reimbursements and waived fees         (1.15)%        (1.17)%        (1.05)%        (1.07)%        (0.87)%
           After expense reimbursements and waived fees          (1.15)%        (1.17)%        (1.05)%        (1.07)%        (0.79)%


      Portfolio turnover rate                                    86.18 %       115.51 %       110.04 %        75.42 %        66.03 %

      Average brokerage commissions per share (b)             $ 0.0580       $ 0.0568           --             --              --



(a) Total return does not reflect payment of a sales charge.
(b) Represents total commissions paid on  portfolio securities  divided by total
    portfolio shares purchased or sold on which commissions were charged.


                                                                                      See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                      THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 August 31, 1998


NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND OTHER INFORMATION

         The Chesapeake  Aggressive Growth Fund (the "Fund"),  formerly known as
         The Chesapeake  Growth Fund prior to November 1, 1997, is a diversified
         series of shares of beneficial interest of the Gardner Lewis Investment
         Trust (the "Trust").  The Trust is an open-end investment company which
         was  organized  in  1992  as a  Massachusetts  Business  Trust  and  is
         registered  under the  Investment  Company Act of 1940,  (the "Act") as
         amended.  The Fund began  operations on January 4, 1993. The investment
         objective  of  the  Fund  is  to  seek  capital   appreciation  through
         investments in equity  securities,  consisting  primarily of common and
         preferred  stocks and securities  convertible  into common stocks.  The
         following is a summary of significant  accounting  policies followed by
         the Fund:

         A.    Security  Valuation - The Fund's  investments  in securities  are
               carried at value. Securities listed on an exchange or quoted on a
               national  market  system are valued at the last sales price as of
               4:00  p.m.  New  York  time.  Other  securities   traded  in  the
               over-the-counter  market and listed  securities for which no sale
               was  reported  on that  date are  valued at the most  recent  bid
               price.  Securities  for which market  quotations  are not readily
               available,  if any,  are valued by using an  independent  pricing
               service  or by  following  procedures  approved  by the  Board of
               Trustees.  Investment  companies  are valued at net asset  value.
               Short-term  investments  are  valued at cost  which  approximates
               value.

         B.    Federal  Income  Taxes - No  provision  has been made for federal
               income  taxes  since it is the policy of the Fund to comply  with
               the  provisions  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code  applicable  to
               regulated   investment   companies   and   to   make   sufficient
               distributions  of taxable  income to relieve it from all  federal
               income taxes.

               Net investment income (loss) and net realized gains  (losses) may
               differ for financial  statement and income tax purposes primarily
               because of losses  incurred  subsequent  to October 31, which are
               deferred for income tax purposes.  The character of distributions
               made during the year from net  investment  income or net realized
               gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal
               income  tax  purposes.  Also,  due  to  the  timing  of  dividend
               distributions,  the fiscal year in which amounts are  distributed
               may differ from the year that the income or  realized  gains were
               recorded by the Fund.

               As a result of  the  Fund's  operating  net  investment  loss,  a
               reclassification  adjustment of  $6,758,939  has been made on the
               statement of assets and  liabilities to decrease  accumulated net
               investment  loss,  bringing  it to  zero,  and  decrease  paid-in
               capital.

         C.    Investment Transactions - Investment transactions are recorded on
               the trade date.  Realized gains and losses are  determined  using
               the  specific  identification  cost  method.  Interest  income is
               recorded daily on an accrual basis.  Dividend  income is recorded
               on the ex-dividend date.

         D.    Distributions  to  Shareholders - The Fund may declare  dividends
               annually,  payable on a date  selected by the  Trust's  Trustees.
               Distributions  to  shareholders  are recorded on the  ex-dividend
               date. In addition, distributions may be made annually in November
               out of net realized  gains through  October 31 of that year.  The
               Fund may make a supplemental  distribution  subsequent to the end
               of its fiscal year ending August 31.

                                                                     (Continued)
<PAGE>

                      THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 August 31, 1998


         E.    Use of Estimates - The  preparation  of financial  statements  in
               conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires
               management  to make  estimates  and  assumptions  that affect the
               amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in
               the financial statements.  Actual results could differ from those
               estimates.


NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

         Pursuant  to an  investment  advisory  agreement,  Gardner  Lewis Asset
         Management (the "Advisor")  provides the Fund with a continuous program
         of supervision of the Fund's assets,  including the  composition of its
         portfolio,  and furnishes  advice and  recommendations  with respect to
         investments,   investment  policies,  and  the  purchase  and  sale  of
         securities.  As compensation  for its services,  the Advisor receives a
         fee at the annual rate of 1.25% of the Fund's average daily net assets.

         The   Fund's    administrator,    The    Nottingham    Company,    (the
         "Administrator"),  provides administrative services to and is generally
         responsible for the overall management and day-to-day operations of the
         Fund pursuant to an accounting  and  administrative  agreement with the
         Trust. As compensation for its services,  the Administrator  received a
         fee at the  annual  rate of 0.20% of the  Fund's  first $25  million of
         average daily net assets,  0.15% of the next $25 million,  and 0.10% of
         average  daily net assets over $50 million for the period  September 1,
         1997 to December 31, 1997. Beginning January 1, 1998, the Administrator
         receives  a fee at the  annual  rate of 0.20% of the  Fund's  first $25
         million of average daily net assets, 0.15% of the next $25 million, and
         0.075% of average daily net assets over $50 million.  The Administrator
         also receives a monthly fee of $1,750 for accounting and  recordkeeping
         services.  The Administrator also charges for certain expenses involved
         with the daily valuation of portfolio securities.

         NC Shareholder  Services,  LLC (the "Transfer Agent") has been retained
         by the Administrator to serve as the Fund's transfer,  dividend paying,
         and  shareholder  servicing  agent.  The Transfer  Agent  maintains the
         records of each shareholder's  account,  answers shareholder  inquiries
         concerning  accounts,  processes  purchases  and  redemptions  of  Fund
         shares,  acts  as  dividend  and  distribution  disbursing  agent,  and
         performs other shareholder  servicing functions.  The Transfer Agent is
         compensated for its services by the  Administrator  and not directly by
         the Fund.

         Capital Investment Group, Inc. (the "Distributor") serves as the Fund's
         principal  underwriter and  distributor.  The Distributor  receives any
         sales charges imposed on purchases of shares and re-allocates a portion
         of such charges to dealers  through whom the sale was made, if any. For
         the year ended August 31, 1998, the Distributor  retained sales charges
         in the amount of $1,770.

         Certain  Trustees  and  officers of the Trust are also  officers of the
         Advisor or the Administrator.


NOTE 3 - PURCHASES AND SALES OF INVESTMENTS

         Purchases and sales of investments  other than  short-term  investments
         aggregated  $490,382,786 and $561,492,464,  respectively,  for the year
         ended August 31, 1998.
<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Board of Trustees of Gardner Lewis  Investment Trust and  Shareholders of
  The Chesapeake Aggressive Growth Fund:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities,  including
the  portfolio  of  investments,  of The  Chesapeake  Aggressive  Growth Fund (a
portfolio of Gardner Lewis  Investment  Trust),  as of August 31, 1998,  and the
related  statement of  operations  for the year then ended,  the  statements  of
changes  in net  assets  for the years  ended  August  31,  1998 and  1997,  and
financial  highlights for the years then ended.  These financial  statements and
financial  highlights  are the  responsibility  of the  Fund's  management.  Our
responsibility  is to  express  an opinion  on these  financial  statements  and
financial highlights based on our audits

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance  about whether the financial  statements and financial  highlights are
free of material  misstatement.  An audit includes  examining,  on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our
procedures  included  confirmation of the securities owned as of August 31, 1998
by  correspondence  with the  custodian  and  brokers;  where  replies  were not
received,  we  performed  other  auditing  procedures.  An audit  also  includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  such  financial  statements  and financial  highlights  present
fairly,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  position of The  Chesapeake
Aggressive Growth Fund as of August 31, 1998, the results of its operations, the
changes in its net assets and its financial highlights for the respective stated
periods, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
September 18, 1998
<PAGE>



________________________________________________________________________________


                            THE CHESAPEAKE AGGRESSIVE
                                   GROWTH FUND

________________________________________________________________________________


                 a series of the Gardner Lewis Investment Trust
























                        This Report has been prepared for
                     shareholders and may be distributed to
                    others only if preceded or accompanied by
                              a current prospectus.

<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________


                                                        October 1, 1998



Dear Shareholder:

         The Chesapeake Core Growth Fund closes the third quarter with a loss of
12.2%.  This loss compares to losses of 9.9%,  22.7%, and 20.1% for the S&P 500,
Nasdaq  Industrials  and  Russell  2000,  respectively,  and  leaves  us up 1.0%
year-to-date.  Negative  news  revolving  around  everything  from  Japanese and
Russian  economic  turmoil to the White House  scandal has  heightened  investor
nervousness,  and in  turn,  market  volatility.  As if these  problems  are not
enough,  the  bankruptcy  of several  hedge  funds and the  well-publicized  Fed
orchestrated  bailout  of Long  Term  Capital  Management  have  further  fueled
anxiety.

         Most  of the  damage  to  the  market  was  done  in  August,  and  the
preponderance  to smaller  stocks.  The  Russell  2000 was off over 30% from its
April high as compared to the S&P 500 which was off less than 20% from its high.
Macroeconomic concerns acted as fuel for this sell-off as investors attempted to
project  implications  of an uncertain  global  economic  environment  against a
benign domestic  environment.  Interest rates are low and falling, and inflation
remains dormant with commodity  prices hitting new lows.  Balanced  against this
are the possible  implications  of global  weakness to U.S.  corporate  profits.
Nervousness  about what might happen has driven  investors'  decisions  over the
past weeks more than any measurable or real change in the  macroeconomic  state.
Problems in Russia  illustrate  this  important  distinction.  Though  virtually
insignificant as a part of the global economy, with trade representing less than
1% of U.S.  gross  domestic  product,  Russian  turmoil  provided  an  emotional
catalyst that sparked a change in investor psychology. Problems in Asia have far
more  fundamental  weight,  and perhaps it was a lack of positive change in that
region  that  heightened  investor  nervousness.   The  point  is  that  current
nervousness  is about what  could  happen,  not what did happen in the  business
environment.

         Since the  beginning of August,  we have logged more than 1500 contacts
with our investment companies, their customers,  competitors and suppliers in an
effort to  quantify  true  business  prospects,  rather than  conjectured  ones.
Further, we have been diligent in our attempts to quantify risks associated with
the most  negative  of  global  macroeconomic  scenarios  as they  relate to our
investment companies. Our companies are less globally oriented, more proprietary
in  their  businesses,  and  have  earnings  that  are  far  less  sensitive  to
macroeconomic  change than the typical larger company.  In the universe of giant
multinationals,  selling has been based on the  reasonable  concern  that future
corporate profits may not be able to justify current valuations.
Beyond that narrow universe, selling has been less fundamentally based.

         We believe a number of developments can turn current market  sentiment.
From a macroeconomic perspective they are a credible reform package for Japan, a
clear direction for the resolution of the White House scandal,  the abatement of
tax related  selling,  and to a lesser degree  further action on the part of the
Federal Reserve. From a microeconomic perspective,  it is company earnings. What
is important here is not a complete  resolution to these issues, but a belief on
the part of investors that things will begin to improve.

<PAGE>



         This  point  is most  clearly  evidenced  when  studying  the  market's
activity  surrounding  the  Persian  Gulf War.  The best time to invest  was not
January 17th,  the day U.S.  planes began to bomb,  but instead in the middle of
October when the Press was exaggerating the strength of the Republican Guard. In
our  case,  we  would  have  missed  a  portfolio  rally  of 30% had we  waited.
Fortunately,  our discipline precludes us from so doing. And,  ironically,  many
investors  even  missed the late  winter  move  because  they  wanted a complete
resolution to the war before  committing  funds.  By the time the war had ended,
our portfolio  return had further  accelerated  far surpassing its initial gain,
and the S&P 500 had  appreciated 21% from its low. The point is that markets are
anticipatory, thus it is direction that moves them. Conclusion is too late.

         From our  perspective,  the  macroeconomic  issues are being addressed,
with the  Japanese  situation  being the most  tenuous.  Thus,  we believe  that
earnings  should  finally  begin to command an  increasingly  larger  portion of
investor  attention.  In fact,  this  may  already  be  happening.  With  recent
pre-announcements by some of this market's seemingly bulletproof multinationals,
like Coca-Cola,  Gillette, and Disney, we have seen commensurate  compression in
their stock prices. This makes fundamental sense,  because it is these companies
that rely heavily on foreign sales or traffic for their continued growth.

         Why these price  corrections did not take place sooner is probably more
related to psychology  than anything  else.  Last winter,  as market  volatility
increased  over Asian  economic  concerns,  investors  sought  safe-haven in the
largest of  household  names;  but,  now that the  effects of Asia and the other
economies it has contaminated are being felt, investors are in a position to see
its actual impact and can therefore adjust their portfolios accordingly. This is
why we long ago concluded  that earnings and valuation are critical and why they
should once again assume their role of historic importance.  We continue to find
dynamic  companies  within the S&P 500 universe where  valuations are reasonable
and growth rates strong. The Core Growth portfolio of large companies  currently
trades at 18 times  forward  earnings  that are growing at 24%.  The S&P 500 now
trades at 21 times forward earnings that are growing at perhaps 6%.

         In previous periods of great market turmoil,  we have found some of our
best  opportunities as bottoms up fundamental  stockpickers.  It typically takes
some  time for the dust to settle  and the  market  to sort  through  companies'
fundamental prospects in order to differentiate those that sold off for rational
reasons from those that were simply  caught in the  downdraft.  Some of our best
results  in the past  have  been  derived  coming  out of these  types of market
environments.  We feel that our investment  discipline puts us one step ahead of
most market participants in these rebuilding phases, and are busy evaluating the
opportunities currently presented.

Sincerely,



W. Whitfield Gardner                                  John L. Lewis, IV
<PAGE>

               __________________________________________________

                              THE CHESAPEAKE FUNDS
               __________________________________________________

                               Portfolio Spotlight          September 30, 1998

         Because recent market  activity has been centered around macro economic
events, most of our portfolio's short-term performance can be explained by them.
Nevertheless,  there have been two  significant  longer-term  investment  trends
whose  participating  companies  you  may  have  noticed  under-weighted  in our
portfolio.  The first and most  influential  has been the benefit of a declining
interest  rate  environment  on a  consolidating  financial  services  industry.
Greater  involvement  in financial  services  would have helped our  performance
dramatically  over the past  couple of years,  as it did the indices to which we
compare.  The second trend has been the speculation  surrounding the development
of  the  internet.  Internet  related  companies,  although  not  a  significant
weighting in any benchmark, have garnered a great deal of investor attention and
significantly  benefited  those exposed to them. We thought it important that we
address both trends.

         Until  recently,  as interest rates  declined,  interest rate sensitive
instruments including equities like banks, utilities, and real estate investment
trusts benefited tremendously.  Additionally,  these companies wanting some form
of earnings  growth,  and fueled by higher stock prices,  initiated  acquisition
strategies that further elevated prices in the group. Where we could participate
by investing in companies with more estimable  profits,  we did. But, given that
the businesses of many of these  companies  were highly  susceptible to interest
rate  fluctuations  and had  unacceptably  low growth rates,  we passed over the
majority.  The net result of this  interest rate movement was that the financial
services  sector  accounted for more than half of the performance of the Russell
2000 and one third of that of the Russell  Midcap,  from the  beginning  of 1996
until quarter end. Most dramatic was that smaller bank stocks had five times the
average   return  of  the  Russell  2000.   During  this  period,   we  averaged
significantly  less  exposure to the financial  services  group than the Russell
indices.  We continue to feel strongly that the  managements of the companies we
invest in should have more control over their companies' earnings prospects, and
that  relying on an  interest  rate  decline,  or a  takeover,  for stock  price
appreciation violates one of the major tenants of our investment discipline.  We
will  continue to invest in the growing  number of financial  institutions  that
have taken steps to insulate  themselves from interest rate risk, allowing their
managements better control of profit generation.

         As to the  internet,  we,  like  others,  believe  it will be a  viable
vehicle  for  commerce  and where  practical  are  participating  in its growth.
Unfortunately,  the  general  excitement  surrounding  it has caused many of its
related  companies'  stock prices to come public and then trade at  astronomical
valuations. Most of these companies are yet to produce a profit and will not for
some time. Thus, evaluating their worth is very difficult.  Tangentially,  cable
stocks have been beneficiaries of this internet boom, but they too carry much of
their current valuation for speculative reasons, such as assumed  consolidation,
rather than  measurable  ones, like strong profit growth.  For this reason,  the
only viable approach within our discipline has been to participate through those
companies  helping to build the equipment that makes the internet work and whose
sales and profits are estimable.  Nevertheless, it has been the concept-oriented
companies that have been the strongest performers.

         We have seen this pattern repeated  before,  where the concept precedes
the reality. For instance,  this is the second run for the cable companies whose
fortunes had reversed  approximately a decade ago when investors panicked out of
their  stocks as they came to  realize  that  fundamentals  were far  behind the
excitement.  And just a few years  ago this  same  phenomenon  was  repeated  in
cellular stocks when investors grew to understand that remote mountain locations
did not have the  population  to support  operators'  aggressive  infrastructure
builds. These industries make it, but few in the originally anticipated form. It
takes longer,  is more costly,  more  competitive,  and less  profitable than at
first thought.  Thus,  despite the ramp a number of the internet  related stocks
are now on, there will  ultimately be a day of reckoning when investors will ask
each company management, "What are you going to earn?". In the case of Netscape,
the original internet darling,  this has meant a stock price decline of 75%. Our
discipline is founded in fundamentals, because the market is grounded by them.
<PAGE>

                  ____________________________________________

                        THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND
                  ____________________________________________

                               September 30, 1998


Investment Strategy
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Chesapeake Core Growth Fund seeks capital  appreciation  through investments
in large capitalization growth equities. The cornerstone of the fund's intensive
in-house  fundamental  analysis  is in  constant  contact  with the  management,
customers, competitors, and suppliers of both current and potential investments.


Investment Guidelines
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fund seeks companies that:

  *  are  experiencing  a rapid  growth  rate - companies in our  portfolio  are
     forecasted to grow their profits in excess of 15% annually;

  *  are selling at a stock price not yet fully reflective of their growth rate;

  *  are  undergoing  a positive  change created  by new products,  managements,
     distribution strategies or manufacturing technologies;

  *  have a  strong balance  sheet  and  are  less  susceptible to macroeconomic
     change.


The Largest Industry Groups  [Represented by Pie Chart in mailings]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Retail Sales & Distribution - 14.3%
     Financial  Services - 10.2%
     Computers & Peripherals - 9.2 % 
     Telecommunications - 8.6 % 
     Energy Services - 8.4%  
     Computers & Software - 6.4%  
     Pharmaceuticals - 6.3%
     Machinery, Construction & Manufacturing - 4.9%
     Business Services - 4.0%
     Semiconductors & Related - 4.0%
     All Others - 23.6%


About The Investment Advisor
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gardner Lewis Asset  management  serves as investment  advisor to the Chesapeake
Family of Funds.  Overall,  through the funds and separately  managed  accounts,
Gardner Lewis  invests  approximately  $2.6 billion in growth  equities for both
institutions and individuals including some of the top foundations,  endowments,
and pension  plans in the U.S.  Gardner  Lewis was founded in 1990 and employs a
staff of 29. The research team is comprised of 15.
<PAGE>
Ten Largest Holdings
- -------------------------------------
1.  MCI Worldcom Inc.            5.8%
2.  CVS Corporation              3.9%
3.  Warner Lambert & Co.         3.9%
4.  IMS Health Inc.              3.3%
5.  Cisco Systems                3.1%
6.  Guidant Corp.                3.0%
7.  Tyco Industries, Inc.        2.9%
8.  Nationsbank Corp.            2.9%
9.  Lowe's Companies, Inc.       2.9%
10. Sun Microsystems, Inc.       2.9%


Portfolio Characteristics
- -------------------------------------
Number of Companies               44
5 Yr. Historical Earnings Growth  24%
Earnings Growth - net year        24%
P/E Ratio - next year             18
  (Gardner Lewis earnings estimates)


Performance Summary
- ------------------------------------------------------
                              Annualized
- ------------------------------------------------------
Period Ended      Year to                    Since
   9/30/98         Date        1 Year      Inception
- ------------------------------------------------------
The Chesapeake     
Core Growth Fund   1.0%         -4.1%         0.4%
- ------------------------------------------------------


The inception  date of the Fund was September 29, 1997. The  performance  quoted
represents  past  performance  and is not a guarantee of future  results.  Share
price and  investment  return will vary, so you may have a gain or loss when you
sell shares.


       For more complete information regarding The Fund including charges
and expenses, obtain a prospectus by calling the Fund directly at (800)430-3863
  or Gardner Lewis Asset Management, the Investment Advisor at (610)558-2800.

                Must be accompanied or preceded by a prospectus.
                  Capital Investment Group, Inc., Distributor
                           Raleigh, NC (800)525-3863
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                       _____________________________________________________

                                                  THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND
                                       _____________________________________________________




                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
                                                             (unaudited)
                                                         September 30, 1998

============================================================      =========================================================
Quantity        Security                       Market Value       Quantity      Security                      Market Value
============================================================      =========================================================
      3,500 AES Corporation                         129,719           1,070 International Business Machines        137,495
      3,300 AlliedSignal, Inc.                      116,738           9,100 K Mart Corp.                           109,200
      1,700 Allmerica Financial Corp.               101,363           5,000 Lowe's Companies, Inc.                 159,063
      2,500 Ascend Communications                   113,750           6,499 MCI Worldcom Inc.                      317,627
      2,520 BMC Software, Inc.                      151,358           3,800 Micron Technology                      115,663
      2,900 Block, H & R, Inc.                      119,988           2,990 Nationsbank Corp.                      159,965
      1,400 Bristol Myers Squibb Co.                145,425           2,700 Networks Associates, Inc.               95,850
      4,900 CVS Corporation                         214,681             700 Nokia Corporation                       54,775
      4,520 Cadence Design Systems                  115,543           3,300 Rite Aid Corporation                   117,150
      4,340 CalEnergy                               115,010           3,900 Saks, Inc.                              87,506
      7,910 Cendant Corporation                      91,954           3,200 Service Corp.                          102,000
      1,000 Chase Manhattan Bank                     43,125           6,150 Southwest Airlines, Co.                124,538
      2,700 Cisco Systems                           166,894           1,500 Staples, Inc.                           44,063
      1,600 Costco Companies, Inc.                   75,800           3,170 Sun Microsystems, Inc.                 157,906
      2,720 EMC Corporation                         156,060           1,500 TRICON Global Restaurants               58,688
      1,300 Gateway 2000, Inc.                       68,006           2,200 Travelers Group, Inc.                   82,500
      2,200 Guidant Corp.                           163,350           2,900 Tyco Industries, Inc.                  160,225
      4,000 Halliburton Co                          115,000           1,800 U.S. Airways Group, Inc.                91,125
      2,700 Hertz Corp.                             113,063           3,100 Unicom Inc.                            115,863
      2,900 Household International                 108,750           2,800 Warner Lambert & Co.                   211,400
      2,940 IMS Health Inc.                         182,096           3,250 Waste Management, Inc.                 156,203
      1,260 Intel Corp.                             108,045           1,100 Wellpoint Health Networks Inc.          61,669



                                                                            TOTAL EQUITY                         5,436,186

                                                                            CASH EQUIVALENT                        200,150

                                                                            TOTAL ASSETS                         5,636,336
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

________________________________________________________________________________


                         THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

________________________________________________________________________________


                 a series of the Gardner Lewis Investment Trust






                             Semi-Annual Report 1998


                         FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31






                               INVESTMENT ADVISOR
                         Gardner Lewis Asset Management
                        285 Wilmington-West Chester Pike
                         Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania 19317



                         THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND
                           107 North Washington Street
                             Post Office Drawer 4365
                     Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27803-0365
                                 1-800-430-3863



<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
                                                   THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                       Shares              (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - 90.57%

       Auto & Trucks - 1.94%
            The Hertz Corporation ....................................................                  3,600            $   135,900
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Commercial Services - 5.99%
       (a)  Cendant Corporation ......................................................                 10,510                121,522
            H&R Block, Inc. ..........................................................                  3,900                152,588
            Service Corporation International ........................................                  4,300                145,662
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             419,772
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Computers - 11.34%
       (a)  Cisco Systems, Inc. ......................................................                  2,400                196,500
       (a)  EMC Corporation ..........................................................                  4,220                189,372
       (a)  Gateway 2000, Inc. .......................................................                  1,800                 84,938
            International Business Machines Corporation ..............................                  1,370                154,296
       (a)  Sun Microsystems, Inc. ...................................................                  4,270                169,199
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             794,305
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Computer Software & Services - 8.58%
       (a)  BMC Software, Inc. .......................................................                  3,320                140,478
       (a)  Cadence Design Systems, Inc. .............................................                  6,020                127,173
            IMS Health Incorporated ..................................................                  3,940                216,700
       (a)  Network Associates, Inc. .................................................                  3,600                116,100
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             600,451
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Electronics - Semiconductor - 1.69%
            Intel Corporation ........................................................                  1,660                118,171
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Environmental Control - 3.06%
       (a)  Waste Management, Inc. ...................................................                  4,850                214,005
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Financial - Banks, Commercial - 4.69%
            NationsBank Corporation ..................................................                  3,990                229,673
            State Street Corporation .................................................                  1,900                 98,919
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             328,592
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Financial - Banks, Money Center - 0.97%
            The Chase Manhattan Corporation ..........................................                  1,300                 68,250
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Financial Services - 3.63%
            The CIT Group, Inc. ......................................................                  4,300                110,456
            Household International, Inc. ............................................                  3,900                144,056
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             254,512
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Household Products & Housewares - 2.16%
            Maytag Corporation .......................................................                  3,500                150,938
                                                                                                                         -----------


                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                   THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                       Shares              (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Insurance - Multiline - 3.84%
            Allmerica Financial Corporation ..........................................                  2,300            $   137,138
            Travelers Group Inc. .....................................................                  3,500                132,000
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             269,138
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Medical - Hospital Management & Service - 5.12%
            Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation ......................................                  6,350                143,272
       (a)  HEALTHSOUTH Corporation ..................................................                  7,160                135,593
       (a)  Wellpoint Health Networks Inc. ...........................................                  1,500                 80,063
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             358,928
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Medical Supplies - 2.23%
            Guidant Corporation ......................................................                  2,600                156,000
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Miscellaneous - Manufacturing - 4.94%
            AlliedSignal Inc. ........................................................                  4,400                150,975
            Tyco International Ltd. ..................................................                  3,500                194,250
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             345,225
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Oil & Gas - Equipment & Services - 2.05%
            Halliburton Company ......................................................                  5,400                143,438
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Pharmaceuticals - 4.31%
            Warner-Lambert Company ...................................................                  4,600                301,588
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Restaurants & Food Service - 1.06%
       (a)  Tricon Global Restaurants, Inc. ..........................................                  2,000                 74,125
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Retail - Department Stores - 1.89%
       (a)  Profitt's, Inc. ..........................................................                  5,200                132,600
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Retail - Drug Stores - 3.38%
            CVS Corporation ..........................................................                  6,500                236,438
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Retail - General Merchandise - 2.20%
       (a)  Kmart Corporation ........................................................                 12,100                154,275
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Retail - Specialty - 1.39%
       (a)  Staples, Inc. ............................................................                  3,600                 97,650
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Telecommunications - 4.14%
            MCI Communications Corporation ...........................................                  5,800                290,000
                                                                                                                         -----------



                                                                                                                         (Continued)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                   THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                                                      PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Value
                                                                                                       Shares              (note 1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMON STOCKS - (Continued)

       Transportation - Air - 4.10%
            Southwest Airlines Co. ...................................................                  8,250            $   147,469
       (a)  US Airways Group, Inc. ...................................................                  2,400                139,800
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             287,269
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Utilities - Electric - 3.91%
       (a)  The AES Corporation ......................................................                  4,700                128,075
       (a)  CalEnergy Company, Inc. ..................................................                  5,740                146,010
                                                                                                                         -----------
                                                                                                                             274,085
                                                                                                                         -----------
       Utilities - Telecommunications - 0.91%
       (a)  WorldCom, Inc. ...........................................................                  1,550                 63,453
                                                                                                                         -----------

       Utilities - Water - 1.05%
       (a)  United States Filter Corporation .........................................                  4,100                 73,800
                                                                                                                         -----------

            Total Common Stocks (Cost $6,915,134) ....................................                                     6,342,908
                                                                                                                         -----------

INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 9.80%

       Evergreen Money Market Treasury Institutional Money
            Market Fund Institutional Service Shares .................................                343,299                343,299
       Evergreen Money Market Treasury Institutional Treasury Money
            Market Fund Institutional Service Shares .................................                343,299                343,299
                                                                                                                         -----------

            Total Investment Companies (Cost $686,598) ...............................                                       686,598
                                                                                                                         -----------


Total Value of Investments (Cost $7,601,732 (b)) ................................................          100.37 %     $ 7,029,506
Liabilities In Excess of Other Assets ...........................................................           (0.37)%         (25,596)
                                                                                                           ------       -----------
       Net Assets ...............................................................................          100.00 %     $ 7,003,910
                                                                                                           ======       ===========


       (a)  Non-income producing investment.

       (b)  Aggregate  cost  for  federal  income  tax  purposes  is $7,613,518.
            Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments for  financial
            reporting and federal income tax purposes is as follows:

            Unrealized appreciation                                                                                     $   297,244
            Unrealized depreciation                                                                                        (881,256)
                                                                                                                        -----------

                            Net unrealized depreciation                                                                 $  (584,012)
                                                                                                                        ===========

See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
                                                  THE CHEASAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                                                 STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

                                                           August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)


ASSETS
       Investments, at value (cost $7,601,732) .........................................................                $ 7,029,506
       Cash ............................................................................................                     46,569
       Income receivable ...............................................................................                      5,202
       Receivable for investments sold .................................................................                     10,913
       Prepaid expenses ................................................................................                      2,830
                                                                                                                        -----------

            Total assets ...............................................................................                  7,095,020
                                                                                                                        -----------

LIABILITIES
       Accrued expenses ................................................................................                     13,865
       Payable for investment purchases ................................................................                     77,245
                                                                                                                        -----------

            Total liabilities ..........................................................................                     91,110
                                                                                                                        -----------

NET ASSETS
       (applicable to 749,738 shares outstanding; unlimited
        shares of no par value beneficial interest authorized) .........................................                $ 7,003,910
                                                                                                                        ===========

NET ASSET VALUE, REDEMPTION AND OFFERING PRICE PER SHARE
       ($7,003,910 / 749,738 shares) ...................................................................                     $ 9.34
                                                                                                                        ===========

NET ASSETS CONSIST OF
       Paid-in capital .................................................................................                $ 7,844,124
       Accumulated net realized loss on investments ....................................................                   (267,988)
       Net unrealized depreciation on investments ......................................................                   (572,226)
                                                                                                                        -----------
                                                                                                                        $ 7,003,910
                                                                                                                        ===========







See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
                                                   THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                                                       STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

                                                    Period ended August 31, 1998
                                                             (Unaudited)



INVESTMENT LOSS

       Income
            Dividends ....................................................................................              $    26,709
                                                                                                                        -----------

       Expenses
            Investment advisory fees (note 2) ............................................................                   32,352
            Fund administration fees (note 2) ............................................................                    2,426
            Custody fees .................................................................................                    1,614
            Registration and filing administration fees (note 2) .........................................                    1,438
            Fund accounting fees (note 2) ................................................................                   10,500
            Audit fees ...................................................................................                    4,033
            Legal fees ...................................................................................                   10,566
            Securities pricing fees ......................................................................                    1,376
            Shareholder administration fees (note 2) .....................................................                    6,302
            Shareholder recordkeeping fees ...............................................................                    4,524
            Shareholder servicing expenses ...............................................................                    1,765
            Registration and filing expenses .............................................................                    6,364
            Printing expenses ............................................................................                    1,394
            Trustee fees and meeting expenses ............................................................                    4,033
            Other operating expenses .....................................................................                      606
                                                                                                                        -----------

                 Total expenses ..........................................................................                   89,293
                                                                                                                        -----------

                 Less:
                       Investment advisory fees waived (note 2) ..........................................                  (32,352)
                       Fund administration fees waived (note 2) ..........................................                   (2,426)
                       Shareholder administration fees waived (note 2) ...................................                   (6,302)
                                                                                                                        -----------

                 Net expenses ............................................................................                   48,213
                                                                                                                        -----------

                       Net investment loss ...............................................................                  (21,504)
                                                                                                                        -----------

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED LOSS ON INVESTMENTS

       Net realized loss from investment transactions ....................................................                  (49,574)
       Decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments ................................................               (1,007,539)
                                                                                                                        -----------

            Net realized and unrealized loss on investments ..............................................               (1,057,113)
                                                                                                                        -----------

                 Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations ....................................              $(1,078,617)
                                                                                                                        ===========







See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

                                                   THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                                                 STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                        For the
                                                                                                                      period from
                                                                                                                  September 29, 1997
                                                                                                                    (commencement
                                                                                                  Period ended      of operations)
                                                                                                   August 31,       to February 28,
                                                                                                      1998               1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INCREASE IN NET ASSETS

     Operations
         Net investment loss ............................................................          $   (21,504)         $    (4,600)
         Net realized loss from investment transactions .................................              (49,574)            (218,414)
         (Decrease) increase in unrealized appreciation on investments ..................           (1,007,539)             435,313
                                                                                                   -----------          -----------

              Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations ...........           (1,078,617)             212,299
                                                                                                   -----------          -----------

     Distribution to shareholders
         Distribution in excess of net investment income ................................                    0               (9,859)
                                                                                                   -----------          -----------

     Capital share transactions
         Increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions (a) ...........            2,034,259            5,845,828
                                                                                                   -----------          -----------

                   Total increase in net assets .........................................              955,642            6,048,268

NET ASSETS

     Beginning of period ................................................................            6,048,268                    0
                                                                                                   -----------          -----------

     End of period ......................................................................          $ 7,003,910          $ 6,048,268
                                                                                                   ===========          ===========



(a) A summary of capital share activity follows:
                                                ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                          For the period from
                                                                                                          September 29, 1997
                                                                   Period ended                      (commencement of operations)
                                                                  August 31, 1998                        to February 28, 1998

                                                             Shares              Value                 Shares              Value
                                                ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shares sold ....................................             197,783          $ 2,172,108              563,478          $ 5,837,694
Shares issued for reinvestment
     of distributions ..........................                   0                    0                  830                8,231
                                                         -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------

                                                             197,783            2,172,108              564,308            5,845,925

Shares redeemed ................................             (12,343)            (137,849)                 (10)                 (97)
                                                         -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------

     Net increase ..............................             185,440          $ 2,034,259              564,298          $ 5,845,828
                                                         ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========



See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
                                                   THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                                                        FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                           (For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period)
                                                             (Unaudited)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                       For the
                                                                                                                     period from
                                                                                                                  September 29, 1997
                                                                                                                   (commencement of
                                                                                                 Period ended       operations) to
                                                                                                  August 31,         February 28,
                                                                                                     1998                1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net asset value, beginning of period .................................................              $ 10.72              $ 10.00

      (Loss) income from investment operations
           Net investment loss .......................................................                (0.03)               (0.01)
           Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on investments ....................                (1.35)                0.75
                                                                                                -----------          -----------

               Total from investment operations ......................................                (1.38)                0.74
                                                                                                -----------          -----------

      Distribution to shareholders
           Distribution in excess of net investment income ...........................                (0.00)               (0.02)
                                                                                                -----------          -----------

Net asset value, end of period .......................................................               $ 9.34              $ 10.72
                                                                                                ===========          ===========


Total return .........................................................................               (12.95)%               7.49 %
                                                                                                ===========          ===========


Ratios/supplemental data

      Net assets, end of period ......................................................          $ 7,003,910          $ 6,048,268
                                                                                                ===========          ===========

      Ratio of expenses to average net assets (a)
           Before expense reimbursements and waived fees ..................................            2.76 %               3.19 %
           After expense reimbursements and waived fees ...................................            1.49 %               1.24 %

      Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets (a)
           Before expense reimbursements and waived fees ..................................           (1.94)%              (2.19)%
           After expense reimbursements and waived fees ...................................           (0.67)%              (0.24)%

      Portfolio turnover rate .............................................................           50.70 %              29.83 %

      Average brokerage commissions per share (b) .........................................        $ 0.0556             $ 0.0486

(a)   Annualized.

(b)   Represents total commissions paid on portfolio securities divided by total
      portfolio shares purchased or sold on which commissions were charged.



See accompanying notes to financial statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                         THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 August 31, 1998
                                   (Unaudited)



NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND OTHER INFORMATION

         The Chesapeake Core Growth Fund (the "Fund") is a diversified series of
         shares of  beneficial  interest of the Gardner Lewis  Investment  Trust
         (the "Trust").  The Trust is an open-end  investment  company which was
         organized in 1992 as a  Massachusetts  Business Trust and is registered
         under the Investment  Company Act of 1940, (the "Act") as amended.  The
         Fund began  operations on September 29, 1997. The investment  objective
         of the Fund is to seek  capital  appreciation  through  investments  in
         equity securities,  consisting primarily of common and preferred stocks
         and  securities  convertible  into common  stocks.  The  following is a
         summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund:

         A.       Security  Valuation - The Fund's investments in securities are
                  carried at value.  Securities  listed on an exchange or quoted
                  on a national market system are valued at the last sales price
                  as of 4:00 p.m. New York time. Other securities  traded in the
                  over-the-counter  market  and listed  securities  for which no
                  sale was  reported  on that date are valued at the most recent
                  bid price.  Securities  for which  market  quotations  are not
                  readily available,  if any, are valued by using an independent
                  pricing  service or by  following  procedures  approved by the
                  Board of Trustees.  Short-term  investments are valued at cost
                  which approximates value.

         B.       Federal  Income Taxes - No provision has been made for federal
                  income taxes since it is the policy of the Fund to comply with
                  the  provisions  of the Internal  Revenue Code  applicable  to
                  regulated   investment   companies  and  to  make   sufficient
                  distributions of taxable income to relieve it from
                  all federal income taxes.

                  Net  investment  income (loss) and net realized gains (losses)
                  may differ for  financial  statement  and income tax  purposes
                  primarily because of losses incurred subsequent to October 31,
                  which are deferred for income tax  purposes.  The character of
                  distributions  made during the year from net investment income
                  or  net  realized   gains  may  differ  from  their   ultimate
                  characterization for federal income tax purposes. Also, due to
                  the timing of dividend distributions, the fiscal year in which
                  amounts  are  distributed  may  differ  from the year that the
                  income or realized gains were recorded by the Fund.

         C.       Investment Transactions - Investment transactions are recorded
                  on the trade date.  Realized  gains and losses are  determined
                  using the specific identification cost method. Interest income
                  is  recorded  daily on an accrual  basis.  Dividend  income is
                  recorded on the ex-dividend date.

         D.       Distributions to Shareholders - The Fund may declare dividends
                  annually  on  a  date   selected  by  the  Trust's   Trustees.
                  Distributions  to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend
                  date.  In  addition,  distributions  may be made  annually  in
                  November out of net realized gains through  October 31 of that
                  year. The Fund may make a supplemental distribution subsequent
                  to the end of its fiscal year ending February 28.

         E.       Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial  statements in
                  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting   principles
                  requires  management to make  estimates and  assumptions  that
                  affect  the  amounts  of  assets,  liabilities,  expenses  and
                  revenues reported in the financial statements.  Actual results
                  could differ from those estimated.

                                                                     (Continued)
<PAGE>

                         THE CHESAPEAKE CORE GROWTH FUND

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                 August 31, 1998
                                   (Unaudited)



NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

         Pursuant  to an  investment  advisory  agreement,  Gardner  Lewis Asset
         Management (the "Advisor")  provides the Fund with a continuous program
         of supervision of the Fund's assets,  including the  composition of its
         portfolio,  and furnishes  advice and  recommendations  with respect to
         investments,   investment  policies,  and  the  purchase  and  sale  of
         securities.  As compensation  for its services,  the Advisor receives a
         fee at the annual rate of 1.00% of the Fund's average daily net assets.
         The Advisor  intends to voluntarily  waive all or a portion of its fee.
         There can be no assurance that the foregoing  voluntary fee waiver will
         continue.  The  Advisor has  voluntarily  waived its fee  amounting  to
         $32,352 ($0.06 per share) for the period ended August 31, 1998.

         The   Fund's    administrator,    The    Nottingham    Company,    (the
         "Administrator"),  provides administrative services to and is generally
         responsible for the overall management and day-to-day operations of the
         Fund pursuant to an accounting  and  administrative  agreement with the
         Trust. As compensation for its services,  the Administrator  receives a
         fee at the  annual  rate of  0.075%  of the  Fund's  average  daily net
         assets.  The  Administrator  also  receives a monthly fee of $1,750 for
         accounting and recordkeeping  services.  The Administrator also charges
         for certain  expenses  involved  with the daily  valuation of portfolio
         securities. The Administrator has voluntarily waived its fees amounting
         to $8,728 ($0.02 per share) for the period ended August 31, 1998.

         NC Shareholder  Services,  LLC (the "Transfer Agent") has been retained
         by the Administrator to serve as the Fund's transfer,  dividend paying,
         and  shareholder  servicing  agent.  The Transfer  Agent  maintains the
         records of each shareholder's  account,  answers shareholder  inquiries
         concerning  accounts,  processes  purchases  and  redemptions  of  Fund
         shares,  acts  as  dividend  and  distribution  disbursing  agent,  and
         performs other shareholder  servicing functions.  The Transfer Agent is
         compensated for its services by the  Administrator  and not directly by
         the Fund.

         Certain  Trustees  and  officers of the Trust are also  officers of the
         Advisor or the Administrator.


NOTE 3 - PURCHASES AND SALES OF INVESTMENTS

         Purchases and sales of investments  other than  short-term  investments
         aggregated $4,548,908 and $3,001,156 respectively, for the period ended
         August 31, 1998.


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission