DISCOVER CARD MASTER TRUST I
424B3, 1997-04-15
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
Previous: DISCOVER CARD MASTER TRUST I, 424B3, 1997-04-15
Next: DISCOVER CARD MASTER TRUST I, 424B3, 1997-04-15



<PAGE>   1
                                                FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 424(B)(3)
                                                   OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
                                                       REGISTRATION NO. 33-71504


                                ANNUAL APPENDIX

ANNUAL APPENDIX DATED
APRIL 15, 1997 TO PROSPECTUS
DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1993, AS
SUPPLEMENTED THROUGH MARCH 17, 1997

                 Discover(R) Card Master Trust I, Series 1993-3

              6.20% Class A Credit Card Pass-Through Certificates
              6.45% Class B Credit Card Pass-Through Certificates

                            Greenwood Trust Company
                      Master Servicer, Servicer and Seller

     The following updates the Prospectus dated November 16, 1993, as
supplemented (the "Prospectus"), used by Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. in
connection with offers and sales of the Class A Certificates and the Class B
Certificates in market-making transactions in which Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.
acts as principal.

     FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS WHICH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY
PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE INVESTOR CERTIFICATES, SEE "RISK FACTORS" ON PAGE
9. ALL REFERENCES TO "SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS" SHALL BE REPLACED WITH REFERENCES
TO "RISK FACTORS."

     1. GENERAL

     References in the Prospectus to Discover Card Services, Inc. ("DCSI") are
replaced by references to NOVUS Services, Inc. ("NSI").

     On February 5, 1997, Dean Witter, Discover & Co. ("DWDC"), the indirect
parent of Greenwood Trust Company ("Greenwood"), and Morgan Stanley Group, Inc.
("Morgan Stanley") announced their plans to merge in mid-1997.  Upon completion
of such merger, Greenwood and Greenwood's direct parent, NOVUS Credit Services
Inc. ("NOVUS"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DWDC, will be indirect
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the merged entity, expected to be called Morgan
Stanley, Dean Witter, Discover & Co.  Greenwood believes that the merger will
not have a material effect on the Investor Certificates.


<PAGE>   2


     2. REPORTS TO INVESTOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS

     Delete the first sentence under the heading "Reports to Investor
Certificateholders" on page 3 of the Prospectus and replace with the following:

     Monthly and annual reports containing information concerning the
     Trust and the Series of Investor Certificates offered hereby, prepared by
     the Master Servicer, will be made available to Certificate Owners free of
     charge upon request by calling 302-323-7130, extension 328.

     3. RISK FACTORS

     a.   Delete the text on pages 9-11 relating to "Consumer Protection Laws 
and Regulations" and substitute the following:

          Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations.  The Accounts and the
     Receivables are subject to numerous federal and state consumer protection
     laws and regulations that impose requirements on the making and
     enforcement of consumer loans.  Such laws, as well as any new laws or new
     rulings regarding new or existing laws that may be adopted, may adversely
     affect the Servicer's ability to collect on the Receivables or maintain
     previous levels of monthly periodic finance charges, and failure by the
     Servicer to comply with such requirements could adversely affect the
     Servicer's ability to collect the Receivables.  Greenwood has agreed in
     the Pooling and Servicing Agreement that if a Receivable was not created
     in compliance in all material respects with all requirements of laws
     applicable to it with respect to such Receivable, and if such 
     noncompliance continues beyond a specified cure period and has a material
     adverse effect on the interest of the Trust in all the Receivables,
     Greenwood will repurchase all Receivables in the Accounts containing the
     Receivables affected by such noncompliance.  See "Description of the
     Investor Certificates -- Repurchase of Specified Receivables."  It is not
     anticipated that the Trustee will make any examination of the Receivables
     or the records relating thereto for the purpose of establishing the
     presence or absence of defects in the Accounts, or for any other purpose.
     See "Certain Legal Matters Relating to the Receivables -- Consumer
     Protection Laws and Debtor Relief Laws Applicable to the Receivables."

          Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations; Litigation.  Greenwood is
     involved from time to time in various legal proceedings that arise in the
     ordinary course of its business.  Greenwood does not believe that the
     resolution of any of these proceedings will have a material adverse
     effect on Greenwood's financial condition or on the Receivables.  There
     can be no assurance, however, regarding any of these effects.

          Certain legal and administrative proceedings challenged, under the
     laws of several states, the imposition of late payment fees (or other
     incidental charges) by Greenwood on Discover cardmembers.  In each of
     these matters, the party proceeding against Greenwood claimed that
     applicable state law prohibits or limits the imposition of late payment
     fees, sought to enjoin Greenwood from imposing late payment fees on
     Discover 

                                       2




<PAGE>   3

      Card accounts of residents of the state in question and sought
      refunds of (and, in some cases, civil penalties with respect to) late 
      payment fees previously imposed on such accounts.  Greenwood asserted a 
      defense in these proceedings that federal law preempts any state law 
      prohibition against or limitation on charging a late payment fee or other
      fee with respect to Discover Card accounts.  On June 3, 1996, the United 
      States Supreme Court issued a decision holding that state laws limiting 
      late charges are preempted with respect to national banks by federal law, 
      and the Court remanded for reconsideration lower-court decisions that had 
      held that such state laws were not similarly preempted with respect to 
      other federally insured banks.  In light of these rulings, all of the 
      outstanding legal and administrative proceedings challenging, on the 
      basis of state law, Greenwood's imposition of late fees and other 
      incidental charges on Discover cardmembers were resolved in 1996 in 
      Greenwood's favor. No such proceedings are currently pending.

           Greenwood believes that none of the above referenced legal
      proceedings concerning late payment fees has had a material effect on the
      Receivables.

      b. Delete the first two full paragraphs on page 11 and substitute the
following:

           Legislation.  The Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 ("CEBA")
      contains provisions that limit the ability of nonbanking companies, such
      as DWDC and DWDC's wholly-owned subsidiary, NOVUS, the owner of
      Greenwood, to own banks.  However, the legislation permits any nonbanking
      company that owned a bank on March 5, 1987 to retain control of the bank.
      DWDC and NOVUS are permitted to retain control of Greenwood under this
      legislation.  CEBA provides that if DWDC, NOVUS or Greenwood fails to
      comply with certain statutory restrictions, DWDC and NOVUS will be
      required to divest control of Greenwood or to limit its activities
      significantly.  Greenwood believes, however, that in light of the
      programs it has in place, the limitations of CEBA will not have a
      material impact on Greenwood's ability to service, or maintain the level
      of, the Receivables.  In addition, future federal or state legislation,
      regulation or interpretation of federal or state legislation or
      regulation could adversely affect the business of Greenwood or the
      relationship of DWDC or NOVUS with Greenwood. See "The Seller --
      Greenwood."

      c. Delete the text on pages 11-12 under the heading "Competition in the
Credit Card Industry" and substitute the following:

           Competition in the Credit Card Industry.  The credit card industry
      in which the Discover Card competes is highly competitive.  This
      competition focuses on features and other financial incentives of credit
      cards such as annual fees, finance charges, late payment fees, overlimit
      charges, rebates and other enhancement features.  The market includes
      bank-issued credit cards (including "co-branded" cards issued by banks in
      cooperation with industrial, retail or other companies) and charge cards
      issued by travel and entertainment companies.  The vast majority of the
      bank-issued credit cards bear the Visa or MasterCard service mark and are
      issued by the many banks that participate in one or both of the national
      bank card networks operated by Visa U.S.A. Inc. and MasterCard

                                       3

<PAGE>   4
      International Incorporated.  The Visa and MasterCard associations have
      been in existence for approximately twenty-five years.  Cards bearing
      their service marks have worldwide acceptance by merchants of goods and
      services and recognition by consumers and the general public.  Co-branded 
      credit cards, which offer the cardholder certain benefits relating to the 
      industrial, retail or other business of the bank's co-branding partner 
      (e.g., credits towards purchases of airline tickets or rebates for the 
      purchase of an automobile), currently represent a rapidly growing segment 
      of the bank-issued credit card market.  The majority of travel and 
      entertainment cards are issued by American Express Company, which has 
      been issuing cards since 1958.  Travel and entertainment cards differ 
      from bank cards in that they have no pre-established credit limits and 
      have limited provisions for repayment in installments.  American Express 
      Company, through a subsidiary bank, also issues cards with both a 
      pre-established credit limit and provisions for repayment in installments.
  
      The Discover Card was introduced nationwide in 1986 and competes with 
      general purpose credit cards issued by other banks and with travel and 
      entertainment cards.  Greenwood currently is the primary issuer of the 
      Discover Card.  Greenwood also issues, and intends from time to time to 
      introduce, additional general purpose credit, charge and financial 
      transaction cards; however, none of the accounts associated with these 
      cards is included in the Discover Card Portfolio.

           Many bank credit card issuers have instituted balance transfer
      programs.  Generally, under these transfer programs, cardholders are
      offered a favorable annual percentage rate or other financial incentives
      for a specified length of time on any portion of their account balances
      arising from the transfer to their accounts of outstanding account
      balances maintained on another credit card.  The annual percentage rates
      for balance transfers often are more favorable to cardholders than the
      annual percentage rates for account balances arising from purchases or
      cash advances.

           This competition affects Greenwood's ability to obtain applicants
      for Discover Card accounts, to encourage usage of the accounts by
      cardmembers and to obtain participation in the Discover Card program by
      service establishments.  A significant adverse change in any of these
      factors could result in a decrease in the level of the Receivables, and
      of the receivables in the Discover Card Portfolio.  If there is a
      decrease in the level of Receivables, and if sufficient receivables in
      Additional Accounts are not available to be added to the Trust or are not
      added, an Amortization Event could result, causing the commencement of
      the Amortization Period.  See "Risk Factors -- Payments and Maturity" and
      "Description of the Investor Certificates -- Amortization Events."

           DWDC, the indirect owner of Greenwood, pursues a general purpose
      credit card strategy of multiple bank association and proprietary card
      products.  For example, in early 1994, MountainWest Financial
      Corporation, a Utah industrial loan corporation that is indirectly owned
      by DWDC, began participating in a program by NationsBank of Delaware,
      N.A. to issue a new, nationally marketed co-branded MasterCard(R) credit
      card under the name "Prime Option(SM)."  Greenwood expects that from time
      to time additional general purpose credit card products will be
      introduced through Greenwood or other DWDC subsidiaries in order to
      attract additional consumers.  The introduction of a new 

                                       4

<PAGE>   5

      general purpose credit card product by any market competitor poses 
      incremental competition for Discover Card and for other credit card 
      issuers.  Although Greenwood currently does not expect that the issuance 
      of any new card by Greenwood or another DWDC subsidiary will have a 
      materially greater impact on the Discover Card program than the 
      introduction of a comparable product by any other market competitor, no 
      assurance can be given with respect to the future competitive impact of 
      such programs on the Discover Card Portfolio.

      d. Delete the text on pages 12-13 under the heading "Ability to Change
Terms of the Accounts" and substitute the following:

           Ability to Change Terms of the Accounts.  Pursuant to the Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement, Greenwood does not transfer Accounts to the
      Trust, but only the Receivables arising in the Accounts.  As owner of the
      Accounts, Greenwood has the right to determine the periodic finance
      charges applicable from time to time to the Accounts, to alter the
      minimum monthly payment required under the Accounts, to change the credit
      limit with respect to the Accounts and to change various other terms with
      respect to the Accounts.  A decrease in the periodic finance charges or
      other fees with respect to an Account could decrease the Series Finance
      Charge Collections, which would decrease the effective yield on the
      Receivables and could also cause the commencement of the Amortization
      Period, as well as decreased protection to Investor Certificateholders
      against shortfalls in Certificate Interest and against charged-off
      Receivables.  In addition, an increase in credit limits could result in
      increases in Charged-Off Amounts, which could result in a decrease in the
      level of the Receivables, and of the receivables in the Discover Card
      Portfolio.  If there is a decrease in the level of Receivables, and if
      sufficient Receivables in Additional Accounts or sufficient Participation
      Interests are not available to be added to the Trust or are not added, an
      Amortization Event could result, causing the commencement of the
      Amortization Period.  See "Description of the Investor Certificates --
      Distributions of Collections and Application of Collections and Certain
      Other Amounts" and "-- Amortization Events."

           The Pooling and Servicing Agreement provides that the Servicer must
      administer, process and enforce the Accounts in accordance with its
      customary and usual servicing procedures for servicing credit accounts
      comparable to the Accounts and in accordance with its Credit Guidelines.
      Each Seller also must agree that the terms governing an Account will not
      be changed unless the change is also made to the terms of other accounts
      of such Seller of the same general type, obligors of which are resident
      in a particular affected state or similar jurisdiction.  There can be no
      assurance that any such change may not affect the Accounts to a greater
      or lesser degree than other such accounts.  Except as set forth above,
      the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Series Supplement do not
      contain any restrictions on the ability of any Seller to change the terms
      of the Accounts or the Receivables.

           There can be no assurance that changes in applicable laws, changes
      in the marketplace or prudent business practice might not result in a
      determination by 

                                       5

<PAGE>   6

      Greenwood to take actions that would result in other changes in the 
      terms of some or all of the Greenwood Discover Card Accounts.

      e.   Delete the third full paragraph on page 13 and substitute the
following:

           Basis Risk.  In general, accounts in the Discover Card Portfolio
accrue periodic finance charges at variable rates based upon factors
such as the prevailing prime rate, the amount of a cardmember's annual
purchases and his or her payment status (although certain account balances may
accrue periodic finance charges at fixed rates, in most instances for specified
periods of time).  See "The Accounts -- Billing and Payments."  As a result, a
significant portion of the Receivables currently bear interest at the
prevailing prime rate plus a margin, while the Class A Certificates bear
interest at the fixed rate of 6.20%, and the Class B Certificates bear interest
at the fixed rate of 6.45%.  If there is a decline in the prime rate, the
amount of Series Finance Charge Collections may be reduced, which could cause
the commencement of the Amortization Period or result in either shortfalls of
Certificate Interest or losses to the Investor Certificateholders.  See
"Description of the Investor Certificates -- Amortization Events."

      4.   THE DISCOVER CARD BUSINESS

      Delete the text under the heading "The Discover Card Business" on pages
16-19 and substitute the following:

      GENERAL

           The Receivables that Greenwood has conveyed to the Trust pursuant to
      the Pooling and Servicing Agreement were generated from transactions made
      by holders of the Discover(R) Card, a general purpose credit and
      financial services card.  The Receivables conveyed to the Trust on the
      Initial Closing Date and thereafter included only receivables arising
      under accounts in the Discover Card Portfolio, although receivables
      arising under accounts not included in the Discover Card Portfolio may be
      added to the Trust at a later date.  See "The Trust -- Addition of
      Accounts."  All references to the Discover Card in this section entitled
      "The Discover Card Business" relate exclusively to the Discover Card
      issued by Greenwood.  With the exception of the small number of Discover
      Card Corporate Cards issued by an affiliate of Greenwood, Greenwood is
      the sole issuer of credit cards bearing the DISCOVER service mark.
      Greenwood also issues, and intends from time to time to introduce,
      additional general purpose credit, charge and financial transaction
      cards.

           The Discover Card was first issued in regional pilot markets in
      September 1985, and national distribution began in March 1986.  The
      Discover Card issued by Greenwood affords cardmembers access to a
      revolving line of credit.  The card can be used to purchase merchandise
      and services from participating service establishments.  The number of
      service establishments that accept the Discover Card has continued to
      increase. In 1996, approximately 425,000 new service establishments were
      enrolled.  The Discover 

                                       6

<PAGE>   7

      Card can also be used to obtain cash advances at automated teller machines
      and at certain other locations throughout the United States.  Cash 
      advances can also be obtained by means of checks written by cardmembers 
      and drawn against their accounts.  As of December 31, 1996, there were 
      34.2 million Discover Card accounts with 44.0 million cardmembers.  The 
      Discover Card issued by Greenwood may only be used for personal, family or
      household purposes due to banking statutes applicable to Greenwood.  See 
      "The Seller -- Greenwood."

           Each Discover cardmember is subject to account terms and conditions
      that are uniform from state to state.  See "The Accounts -- Billing and
      Payments."  In all cases, the agreement governing the terms and
      conditions of the account (the "Cardmember Agreement") permits Greenwood
      to change the credit terms, including the rate of the periodic finance
      charge and the fees imposed on accounts, upon prior notice to
      cardmembers.  Each Discover Card account is assigned a credit limit when
      the account is opened.  Thereafter, individual credit limits may be
      increased or decreased, at Greenwood's discretion, from time to time.
      The credit limits on Discover Card accounts generally range from $1,000
      to $6,000, although on occasion higher or lower limits may be authorized.

           There are additional features and services offered with the Discover
      Card accounts.  One is the Cashback Bonus(R), in which Greenwood annually
      pays cardmembers a percentage of their purchase amounts, ranging up to
      one percent, based on their annual purchases.  This amount is remitted to
      cardmembers in the form of a check or a credit to the cardmember's
      account.  No such amounts will be paid from the property of the Trust.
      Another feature offered with  the Discover Card accounts is a variable
      rate of periodic finance charges applied to a cardmember's account
      balance (except in certain limited circumstances) based on the prevailing
      prime rate plus a margin, the amount of such cardmember's purchases and
      the cardmember's payment history.  See "The Accounts -- Billing and
      Payments."  Greenwood also offers cardmembers money-market deposit
      accounts, called Discover Saver's Accounts, and time deposits, called
      Discover Card CDs.  These deposit products offer competitive rates of
      interest and are insured by the FDIC.  To differentiate the Discover Card
      in the marketplace, Greenwood from time to time tests and implements new
      offers, promotions and features of the Discover Card.

           Greenwood, either directly, through its processing arrangements with
      its affiliate, NSI, or through processing agreements with credit card
      processing facilities of unaffiliated third parties, performs all the
      functions required to service and operate the Discover Card accounts.
      These functions include new account solicitation, application processing,
      new account fulfillment, transaction authorization and processing,
      cardmember billing, payment processing, cardmember service and collection
      of delinquent accounts.  There are currently multiple geographically
      dispersed operations centers maintained by Greenwood or NSI for servicing
      cardmembers.   An additional operations center is maintained for
      processing accounts that have been charged-off as uncollectible.


                                       7

<PAGE>   8
           NSI has established arrangements with service establishments to
      accept the Discover Card and other credit, charge and financial
      transaction cards that carry the NOVUS(SM) logo for cash advances and as
      the means of payment for merchandise and services.  Greenwood contracts
      with NSI to have cards issued by Greenwood (including the Discover Card)
      accepted at those establishments.  The ability to generate new
      receivables requires locations where the Discover Card can be used.  NSI
      employs a national sales and service force to maintain and increase the
      size of its service establishment base.  Additional operations centers
      that currently are maintained by NSI are devoted primarily to providing 
      customer service to service establishments.  The service establishments 
      that accept the Discover Card encompass a wide variety of businesses, 
      including local and national retail establishments and specialty stores 
      of all types, quick service food establishments, governments, restaurants,
      medical providers and warehouse clubs, and many leading airlines, car 
      rental companies, hotels, petroleum companies and mail order companies.

      CREDIT-GRANTING PROCEDURES

           Accounts in the Discover Card Portfolio have been solicited by
      various techniques and have undergone credit review to establish that the
      cardmembers meet standards of ability and willingness to pay.
      Principally, the accounts have been solicited (i) via "pre-approved"
      direct mail or telemarketing, (ii) by "take-one" applications distributed
      in many service establishments that accept the Discover Card and (iii)
      with various other programs targeting specific segments of the
      population.  Solicitations have been supported by general broadcast and
      print media advertising.  Potential applicants who are sent pre-approved
      solicitations have met certain credit criteria relating to their previous
      payment patterns and longevity of account relationships with other credit
      grantors.  Since September 1987, all lists have been pre-screened though
      credit bureaus before mailing.  Pre-screening is a process by which an
      independent credit reporting agency evaluates the lists of names supplied
      by Greenwood against credit-worthiness criteria supplied by Greenwood
      that are intended to provide a general indication, based on available
      information, of the willingness and ability of such persons to repay
      their obligations; the credit bureaus return to Greenwood only the names
      of those persons meeting these criteria.  Applications that are not
      pre-approved are evaluated by using credit-scoring systems (statistical
      evaluation models that assign point values to information regarding
      applications).  The credit-scoring systems used by Greenwood are based on
      the credit-scoring systems developed by scoring model vendors.  Certain
      applications not approved under the credit-scoring systems are reviewed
      by credit analysts.  Any such application as to which a credit analyst
      recommends approval is processed in Greenwood's main office in New
      Castle, Delaware by senior bank review analysts and may be approved by
      them.

           As owner of the Greenwood Discover Card Accounts, Greenwood has the
      right to change its credit-scoring criteria and credit-worthiness
      criteria.  Greenwood's application procedures and credit-scoring systems
      are regularly reviewed and modified to reflect Greenwood's actual credit
      experience with Discover Card account applicants and cardmembers as such
      historical information becomes available.  Greenwood believes that

                                       8

<PAGE>   9
      refinements of these procedures and systems since the inception of the
      Discover Card program have helped it to manage and predict its credit
      losses, although there can be no assurance that these refinements will
      not cause increases in credit losses in the future.  Relaxation of credit
      standards typically results in increases in Charged-Off Amounts, which,
      under certain circumstances, may result in a decrease in the level of the
      Receivables, and of the receivables in the Discover Card Portfolio.  If
      there is a decrease in the level of Receivables, and if sufficient
      Additional Accounts or Participation Interests are not available to be
      added to the Trust or are not added, an Amortization Event could result,
      causing the commencement of the Amortization Period.  In addition, an
      increase in Charged-Off Amounts without an offsetting increase in Finance 
      Charge Receivables could result in an Amortization Event, causing the
      commencement of the Amortization Period.

      COLLECTION EFFORTS

           Efforts to collect past-due Discover Card account receivables
      currently are made primarily by collections personnel of NSI or
      Greenwood.  Under current practice, Greenwood includes a request for
      payment of past-due amounts on the monthly billing statement of all
      accounts with such amounts.  Accounts with  past-due amounts also receive
      a written notice of late fee charges, as well as an additional request
      for payment, 15 days after any monthly statement which includes a
      past-due amount.  Collection personnel generally initiate telephone
      contact with cardmembers within 30 days after any portion of their
      balance becomes past due.  In the event that initial telephone contacts
      fail to elicit a payment, Greenwood continues to contact the cardmember
      by telephone and by mail.  Greenwood may also enter into arrangements
      with cardmembers to waive finance charges, late fees and principal due,
      and extend or otherwise change payment schedules.  The current policy of
      Greenwood is to recognize losses and to charge off an account at the end
      of the sixth full calendar month after a payment amount is first due if
      payment of any portion of that amount has not been received by such time,
      except in cases of bankruptcy, where an uncollectible balance may be
      charged off earlier.  In general, after an account has been charged off,
      collections personnel of NSI or Greenwood make attempts to collect all or
      a portion of the charged-off account for a period of approximately four
      months.  If those attempts are unsuccessful, the charged-off account is
      generally placed with one or more collection agencies for a period of
      approximately a year or, alternatively, Greenwood may commence legal
      action against the cardmember, including legal action for the attachment
      of property or bank accounts of the cardmember or the garnishment of the
      cardmember's wages.  Under certain circumstances, Greenwood may also sell
      charged-off accounts to third parties, either before or after collection
      efforts have been attempted.  To facilitate such sales, a limited number
      of  Charged-Off Accounts may, subject to Rating Agency consent, be
      removed from the Trust prior to such sales.

           Under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, any
      recoveries received on Charged-Off Accounts (other than the proceeds of
      sales of Charged-Off Accounts that have been removed from the Trust) are
      included in the assets of the Trust and are treated 

                                       9




<PAGE>   10
      as Finance Charge Collections.  Recoveries on Charged-Off Accounts 
      initially are lower than the level of recoveries for the Discover Card 
      Portfolio because charged-off accounts were not included as Accounts as of
      the Account Selection Date.  Greenwood believes that, over time, the 
      level of recoveries as a percentage of the Receivables in the Trust will 
      increase to more closely approximate the level of recoveries in the 
      Discover Card Portfolio, although the extent of such increase cannot be 
      predicted and may be limited by removals of Charged-Off Accounts from the
      Trust.  There can be no assurance that the level of recoveries for the 
      Trust will ever equal the level of recoveries for the Discover Card 
      Portfolio.  Similarly, any addition of Additional Accounts to the Trust 
      will cause a temporary reduction in the level of recoveries as a 
      percentage of the Receivables in the Trust because no Additional Accounts 
      will be charged-off accounts at the time of their addition to the Trust.  
      The credit granting, servicing and charge-off policies and collection
      practices of Greenwood may change over time in accordance with
      Greenwood's business judgment and applicable law.  See "Description of
      the Investor Certificates -- Adjustments to Receivables," "The Accounts
      -- Composition of the Accounts," "-- Summary Current Delinquency
      Information" and "Composition and Historical Performance of the Discover
      Card Portfolio -- Composition of the Discover Card Portfolio."

      5.   THE ACCOUNTS.

      a.   Delete the text on pages 19-20 under the subheading "Billing and
Payments" and substitute the following:

           All Discover Card accounts have the same billing and payment
      structure. Monthly billing statements are sent by Greenwood to each
      cardmember with an outstanding debit balance. Discover Card accounts are
      grouped into multiple billing cycles for operational purposes.  Each
      billing cycle has a separate monthly billing date at which time the
      activity in the related accounts during the period of approximately 28 to
      34 days ending on such billing date is processed and billed to
      cardmembers.  The Accounts include accounts in all billing cycles.

           Each Discover cardmember with an outstanding debit balance in his or
      her Discover Card account generally must make a minimum payment equal to
      1/48th of the new balance on the account at the end of the billing cycle
      for the account (prior to February 1996, 1/36th), rounded to the next
      higher whole dollar amount, but not less than $10 or the entire balance,
      whichever is less, plus any amount that is past due.  Under certain
      circumstances, the minimum payment is reduced by amounts paid in excess
      of the minimum payment due during the previous three months and not
      already so applied.  From time to time, Greenwood has offered and may
      continue to offer cardmembers with accounts in good standing the
      opportunity to skip the minimum monthly payment, while continuing to
      accrue periodic finance charges, without being considered to be past due.
      Although these practices are not expected to have a material adverse
      effect on the Investor Certificateholders, Collections may be reduced
      during any period in which Greenwood offers cardmembers the opportunity
      to skip the minimum monthly payment.  

                                       10

<PAGE>   11

      A cardmember may pay the total amount due at any time.  Greenwood also 
      may enter into arrangements with delinquent cardmembers to extend or 
      otherwise change payment schedules, and to waive finance charges, late 
      fees and principal due.

           Greenwood imposes periodic finance charges on Discover Card account
      balances at fixed and variable annual percentage rates.  Periodic finance
      charges on purchases, cash advances and balance transfers are calculated
      on a daily basis, subject to a grace period that essentially provides
      that periodic finance charges are not imposed if the cardmember pays his
      or her entire balance each month.  In general, periodic finance charges
      on purchases, cash advances and balance transfers are based on a prime
      rate plus a margin (currently 8.9% to 13.9%), subject to certain minimum
      rates currently ranging from 12.9% to 19.8%.  The rates imposed on
      individual Discover Card accounts are based on purchase activity and
      payment status.  In addition, in connection with programs for new
      cardmembers, for balance transfers, and for other promotional purposes,
      certain Discover Card account balances may accrue periodic finance
      charges at lower fixed rates for a specified period of time.  Balances
      remaining from transactions posted to accounts in billing cycles
      beginning prior to February 1993 also accrue periodic finance charges at
      fixed rates.

           In addition to periodic finance charges, Greenwood may impose
      certain other charges and fees on Discover Card accounts.  Greenwood
      currently charges a cash advance transaction fee equal to 2.5% of each
      cash advance, with a minimum fee of $2.00 per transaction.  Greenwood
      also currently charges a $20 late fee on Discover Card accounts, a $20
      fee for balances exceeding a cardmember's credit limit as of the close of
      such cardmember's monthly billing cycle and a $15 fee for any payment
      check returned due to insufficient funds.  See "Risk Factors -- Consumer
      Protection Laws and Regulations," "-- Payments and Maturity" and
      "-- Ability of the Seller to Change Terms of the Accounts."

           The yield on the Accounts depends on changes in the prime rate over
      time and in cardmember account usage and payment performance, none of
      which can be predicted, as well as the extent to which balance transfer
      offers and special promotion offers are made and accepted, and the extent
      to which Greenwood changes the terms of the Cardmember Agreement.
      Reductions in the yield could, if sufficiently large, cause the
      commencement of the Amortization Period or result in either shortfalls of
      Certificate Interest or losses to the Investor Certificateholders as the
      result of charged-off Receivables and there can be no assurance regarding
      any of these effects.  See "Risk Factors -- Basis Risk."

      b.   Delete the text under the heading "Composition of the Accounts" on
pages 21-22 and substitute the following:

     COMPOSITION OF THE ACCOUNTS

           Information concerning the composition of the Accounts is set forth
      below.  Information concerning the composition and historical performance
      of the accounts in the 

                                       11

<PAGE>   12
      Discover Card Portfolio is set forth under "Composition and Historical 
      Performance of the Discover Card Portfolio."

           Geographic Distribution.  As of March 1, 1997, the five states with
      the largest Receivables balances were as follows:



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL RECEIVABLES
        STATE                                BALANCE IN THE ACCOUNTS
        -----                            -------------------------------
        <S>                              <C>
        California................                    11.8%
        Texas.....................                     9.2%
        New York..................                     6.8%
        Florida...................                     5.8%
        Illinois..................                     4.9%
</TABLE>

           Credit Limit Information.  Credit limit information as of March 1,
      1997 with respect to the Accounts is summarized as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            RECEIVABLES
                                            OUTSTANDING    PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
      CREDIT LIMIT                            (000)'S    RECEIVABLES OUTSTANDING
      ------------                         ------------- -----------------------
          <S>                                   <C>                 <C>
          Less than or equal to $1,000.00...    $   406,589          2.3%
          $1,000.01 to $2,000.00............    $ 3,470,320         19.5%
          $2,000.01 to $3,000.00............    $ 2,712,610         15.2%
          Over $3,000.00....................    $11,237,054         63.0%
                                                -----------        ------
             Total..........................    $17,826,573        100.0%
                                                ===========        ======
</TABLE>

           Seasoning.  As of March 1, 1997, 72.6% of the Accounts were at least
      24 months old.  The distribution of the age of Accounts as of March 1,
      1997 was as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              PERCENTAGE    PERCENTAGE
      AGE OF ACCOUNTS                         OF ACCOUNTS  OF BALANCES
      ---------------                         -----------  -----------
      <S>                                     <C>          <C>
      Less than 12 Months...................       9.7%         9.7%
      12 to 23 Months.......................      17.7%        19.2%
      24 to 35 Months.......................       6.0%         6.1%
      36 Months and Greater.................      66.6%        65.0%
                                                 ------       ------
        Total...............................     100.0%       100.0%
                                                =======       ======
</TABLE>

           Summary Current Delinquency Information.  Current delinquency
      information as of March 1, 1997 with respect to the Accounts is
      summarized as follows:



                                       12

<PAGE>   13
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 AGGREGATE
                                                  BALANCES    PERCENTAGE
      PAYMENT STATUS                              (000'S)     OF BALANCES
      --------------                             ---------    -----------
      <S>                                       <C>           <C>
      Current................................   $15,384,494      86.2%
      1 to 29 Days...........................   $ 1,062,693       6.0%
      30 to 59 Days..........................   $   515,507       2.9%
      60 to 89 Days..........................   $   303,002       1.7%
      90 to 119 Days.........................   $   222,988       1.3%
      120 to 149 Days........................   $   185,419       1.0%
      150 to 179 Days........................   $   152,470       0.9%
                                                -----------     ------
           Total.............................   $17,826,573     100.0%
                                                ===========     ======
</TABLE>

      6.   COMPOSITION AND HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE OF THE DISCOVER CARD
           PORTFOLIO

      a.   Delete the text under the heading "General" on page 22 and replace 
with the following:

           Except to the extent specifically identified as relating to the
      Accounts, all of the information describing the composition and
      historical performance of Discover Card accounts reflects the composition
      and historical performance of the Discover Card Portfolio, and not that
      of the Accounts.  A limited number of Discover Card accounts were opened
      pursuant to credit scoring criteria materially different from the credit
      scoring criteria generally used for Discover Card Accounts.  These
      accounts have been segregated from the rest of the Discover Card
      Portfolio and are not reflected in the information contained herein.
      None of these accounts is included in the Trust.  Greenwood has no
      statistical or other basis for determining the effects, if any, of the
      selection process, although Greenwood has no reason to believe that the
      Accounts will not be representative of the Discover Card Portfolio in any
      material respect.  There can be no assurance, however, that the Accounts
      have performed or will perform similarly to the Discover Card Portfolio.
      There also can be no assurance that the historical performance of the
      Discover Card Portfolio will be representative of its performance in the
      future.  See "The Accounts -- Billing and Payments," "Risk Factors --
      Basis Risk" and "-- Effects of the Selection Process, Seasoning and
      Performance Characteristics."  For additional discussion of economic
      factors affecting the performance of the Discover Card Portfolio, see
      "Risk Factors -- Social, Legal and Economic Factors."

      b.   Delete the text under the heading, "Composition of Discover Card
Portfolio" and ending before the heading "Payment of the Investor Certificates"
located on pages 22-25 and substitute the following:

      COMPOSITION OF DISCOVER CARD PORTFOLIO


                                       13

<PAGE>   14
      Geographic Distribution.  The Discover Card Portfolio is not concentrated
geographically.  As of December 31, 1996, the five states with the largest
receivables balances were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL RECEIVABLES BALANCE
                                  OF DISCOVER CARD PORTFOLIO
      STATE                         AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996
      -----                         -----------------------
      <S>                   <C>
      California..........                  11.2%
      Texas...............                   9.1%
      New York............                   6.7%
      Florida.............                   5.7%
      Illinois............                   5.2%
</TABLE>

      No other state accounted for more than 5% of the total receivables balance
of the Discover Card Portfolio as of December 31, 1996.

      Credit Limit Information.  Credit limit information as of December 31,
1996 with respect to the Discover Card Portfolio is summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             RECEIVABLES     PERCENTAGE OF
                                             OUTSTANDING   TOTAL RECEIVABLES
      CREDIT LIMIT                             (000)'S        OUTSTANDING
      ------------                             -------        -----------
      <S>                                    <C>           <C>
      Less than or equal to $1,000.00.....   $   598,939          2.1%
      $1,000.01 to $2,000.00..............   $ 4,705,384         16.3%
      $2,000.01 to $3,000.00..............   $ 3,741,712         13.0%
      Over $3,000.00......................   $19,729,727         68.6%
                                              ----------         -----
           Total..........................   $28,775,762        100.0%
                                              ==========        ======
</TABLE>

      Seasoning.  As of December 31, 1996, 80.3% of the accounts in the Discover
Card Portfolio were at least 24 months old.  The distribution of the age of
accounts in the Discover Card Portfolio as of December 31, 1996 was as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        PERCENTAGE   PERCENTAGE
      AGE OF ACCOUNTS                  OF ACCOUNTS  OF BALANCES
      ---------------                  -----------  -----------
      <S>                              <C>          <C>
      Less than 12 Months.........         8.6%         8.2%
      12 to 23 Months.............        11.1%        11.9%
      24 to 35 Months.............        11.3%        11.7%
      36 Months and Greater.......        69.0%        68.2%
                                          -----        -----
           Total..................       100.0%       100.0%
                                         ======       ======
</TABLE>

      Summary Yield Information.  The annualized aggregate monthly yield for the
Discover Card Portfolio is summarized as follows:




                                       14

<PAGE>   15

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                           -----------------------
                                          1996      1995      1994
                                          ----      ----      ----
     <S>                                 <C>       <C>       <C>
     Aggregate Monthly  Yield(1)
        Excluding Recoveries(2).......   17.72%    16.95%    16.65%
        Including Recoveries(3).......   18.20%    17.39%    17.07%
</TABLE>

- ---------------
(1)  Monthly Yield is calculated by dividing Monthly Finance Charges billed by
     beginning monthly balance.  Monthly Finance Charges include periodic
     finance charges, cash advance item charges, late fees, and, as of March 1,
     1996, overlimit fees, but exclude certain other items such as annual
     membership fees, if any, which are included in Finance Charge Receivables.
     Aggregate Monthly Yield is the average of Monthly Yields annualized for
     each period shown.

(2)  Monthly Yield excluding any recoveries received with respect to charged-off
     accounts.

(3)  Monthly Yield including recoveries received with respect to charged-off
     accounts.  Recoveries received with respect to Charged-Off Accounts (other
     than the proceeds of sales of Charged-Off Accounts that have been removed
     from the Trust) are included in the Trust and are treated as Finance
     Charge Collections.  However, the level of recoveries for the Trust will
     initially be lower than the level of recoveries for the Discover Card
     Portfolio because charged-off accounts were not included in the Accounts
     selected for inclusion in the Trust.  The level of recoveries on
     Additional Accounts will also initially be lower than the level of
     recoveries for the Discover Card Portfolio because charged-off accounts
     will not be included in Additional Accounts selected for inclusion in the
     Trust.  Greenwood believes that, over time, the level of recoveries on the
     Accounts (including any Additional Accounts), as a percentage of the
     Receivables in the Trust will increase to more closely approximate the
     level of recoveries in the Discover Card Portfolio, although the extent of
     such increase cannot be predicted and may be limited by removals of
     Charged-Off Accounts from the Trust.

     Summary Current Delinquency Information.  Current delinquency information
as of December 31, 1996 with respect to the Discover Card Portfolio is
summarized as follows:




                                       15

<PAGE>   16
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              AGGREGATE
                                               BALANCES     PERCENTAGE
     PAYMENT STATUS                            (000'S)      OF BALANCES
     --------------                           ---------     -----------
     <S>                                     <C>            <C>
     Current..............................   $24,435,287       84.9%
     1 to 29 Days.........................   $ 2,299,993        8.0%
     30 to 59 Days........................   $   809,902        2.8%
     60 to 89 Days........................   $   448,994        1.6%
     90 to 119 Days.......................   $   327,352        1.1%
     120 to 149 Days......................   $   249,238        0.9%
     150 to 179 Days......................   $   204,996        0.7%
                                              ----------    --------
       Total..............................   $28,775,762      100.0%
                                             ===========    ========
</TABLE>

     Summary Historical Delinquency Information.  Historical delinquency
information with respect to the Discover Card Portfolio is summarized as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       AVERAGE OF TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                       -------------------------------------------
                                       1996                                1995                                1994
                          -----------------------------        -----------------------------      -------------------------------
                            DELINQUENT                           DELINQUENT                         DELINQUENT 
                              AMOUNT                               AMOUNT                             AMOUNT
                              (000'S)     PERCENTAGE(1)            (000'S)     PERCENTAGE(1)          (000'S)       PERCENTAGE(1)
                              -------     ----------               -------     ----------             -------       ----------
     <S>                    <C>           <C>                    <C>           <C>                  <C>             <C> 
     30-59 Days........     $  680,645       2.7%                $  568,382       2.6%               $ 405,942         2.2%
     60-89 Days........     $  361,992       1.4%                $  276,821       1.3%               $ 193,582         1.1%
     90-179 Days.......     $  593,661       2.3%                $  403,134       1.8%               $ 282,080         1.5%
                            ----------       ----                ----------       ----               ----------        ----
     Total.............     $1,636,298       6.4%                $1,248,337       5.7%               $ 881,604         4.8%
                            ==========       ====                ==========       ====               =========         ====
</TABLE>

     For a discussion of economic factors affecting the performance of the
Discover Card Portfolio, including delinquencies, see "Risk Factors -- Social,
Legal and Economic Factors."


- -------------------
(1)  The percentages are the result of dividing Delinquent Amount by Average
     Receivables Outstanding for the applicable period.  Delinquent Amount is
     the average of the monthly ending balances of delinquent accounts during
     the periods indicated.  Average Receivables Outstanding is the average of
     the monthly average amount of receivables outstanding during the periods
     indicated.

     Summary Charge-Off Information.  Charge-off information with respect to
the Discover Card Portfolio is summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                    -----------------------
                                                                               1996           1995           1994
                                                                               ----           ----           ----
                                                                                     (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
  <S>                                                                      <C>            <C>            <C>
  Average Receivables Outstanding(1)................................       $ 25,542,718   $ 22,031,829   $ 18,464,611
  Gross Charge Offs.................................................       $  1,458,450   $    923,836   $    680,487
  Gross Charge-Offs as a Percentage of Average 
  Receivables Outstanding (2).......................................            5.71%          4.19%          3.69%
</TABLE>

                                       16

<PAGE>   17
     For a discussion of economic factors affecting the performance of the
Discover Card Portfolio, including charge-offs, see "Risk Factors -- Social,
Legal and Economic Factors."


- ------------------
(1)  Average Receivables Outstanding is the average of the monthly average
     amount of receivables outstanding during the periods indicated.

(2)  Recoveries with respect to charged-off Receivables (other than the
     proceeds of sales of Charged-Off Accounts that have been removed from the
     Trust) are property of the Trust and are treated as Finance Charge
     Collections.

     Summary Payment Rate Information(1).  The monthly rate of payments in the
Discover Card Portfolio is summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                -----------------------
                                                1996      1995      1994
                                                ----      ----      ----
<S>                                            <C>       <C>       <C>
Average Monthly Payment Rate(2)..........      15.24%    16.20%    16.65%
 High Monthly Payment Rate...............      18.08%    18.97%    17.89%
 Low Monthly Payment Rate................      13.33%    13.67%    15.16%
</TABLE>


- -----------------
(1)  Monthly Payment Rate is calculated by dividing monthly cardmember
     remittances by the cardmember receivable balance outstanding as of the
     beginning of the month.

(2)  Average Monthly Payment Rate for a period is equal to the sum of
     individual monthly payment rates for the period divided by the number of
     months in the period.


     7.    THE SELLER

     Delete the text under the heading "Greenwood" on page 66 and substitute
the following:

          Greenwood is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NOVUS and an indirect
     subsidiary of DWDC.  Greenwood was acquired by NOVUS in January 1985.
     Greenwood was chartered as a banking corporation under the laws of the
     State of Delaware in 1911, and its deposits are insured by the FDIC.
     Greenwood is not a member of the Federal Reserve System.  The executive
     office of Greenwood is located at 12 Read's Way, New Castle, Delaware
     19720.  In addition to the experience obtained by Greenwood in the bank
     card business since 1985, a majority of the senior management of the
     credit, operations and data processing functions for the Discover Card at
     Greenwood and NSI has had extensive experience in the credit operations
     of other credit card issuers.  NSI performs sales and marketing activities,
     provides operational support for the Discover Card program and maintains 
     merchant relationships.  On February 5, 1997, DWDC and Morgan Stanley 
     announced their plans to merge in mid-1997.  Upon completion of such 
     merger, 

                                       17

<PAGE>   18

      Greenwood and NOVUS will be indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the 
      merged entity, expected to be called Morgan Stanley, Dean Witter, 
      Discover & Co. Greenwood believes that the merger will not have a 
      material effect on the Investor Certificates.

           By virtue of the enactment of CEBA, there are certain limitations
      placed on Greenwood, including a requirement that Greenwood not engage in
      activities in which it was not engaged as of March 5, 1987.  Since its
      acquisition by NOVUS, as a result of these and earlier limitations,
      Greenwood has not engaged in the business of making commercial loans.
      See "Risk Factors -- Legislation."  However, the portions of CEBA which
      limited the growth of the average asset base of Greenwood for each
      12-month period ending September 30 to 7% of Greenwood's average asset
      base for the preceding 12-month period have been repealed.  Greenwood
      believes that in light of the programs it has in place, the limitations 
      of CEBA will not have a material impact on the level of the Receivables 
      or on Greenwood's ability to service the Receivables.

      8.   CERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS RELATING TO THE RECEIVABLES

      a.   Delete the second sentence under the heading "Consumer Protection 
Laws and Debtor Relief Laws Applicable to the Receivables" on page 68 and 
substitute the following:

      Such laws and regulations include the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act and
      Fair Credit Billing Act (and the provisions of the Federal Reserve
      Board's Regulation Z issued under each of them), Equal Credit Opportunity
      Act (and the provisions of the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation B
      issued thereunder), Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair Debt Collection
      Practices Act.

      b.   Delete the first full paragraph on page 69 relating to "Consumer
Protection Laws and Debtor Relief Laws Applicable to the Receivables."

      9.   CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

      Delete the text under the heading "Certain Federal Income Tax
Consequences" on pages 69-75 and substitute the following:

      GENERAL

           The following summary of certain anticipated federal income tax
      consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Investor
      Certificates is based on the advice of Latham & Watkins ("Tax Counsel")
      as counsel to Greenwood.  The summary is based upon current provisions of
      the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), currently
      applicable Treasury Regulations and judicial and administrative rulings
      and decisions ("Current Law").  There can be no assurance that the
      Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") will not take a contrary view, and
      no ruling from the IRS has been or will be sought.  Legislative, judicial
      or administrative changes may be forthcoming that could alter or modify
      the statements and conclusions set forth herein.  Any legislative,
      judicial 

                                       18

<PAGE>   19
      or administrative changes or interpretations may or may not be
      retroactive and could affect tax consequences to Investor
      Certificateholders.

           The summary does not purport to deal with all aspects of federal
      income taxation that may affect particular Investor Certificateholders in
      light of their individual circumstances, and, except for certain limited
      discussions of particular topics, is not intended for Investor
      Certificateholders subject to special treatment under the federal income
      tax laws (e.g., life insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations,
      financial institutions, broker-dealers and investors that have a
      functional currency other than the United States dollar or hold their
      Investor Certificates as part of a hedge, straddle or conversion
      transaction).  PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT
      THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND ANY
      OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION 
      OF INVESTOR CERTIFICATES.

      TAX TREATMENT OF THE INVESTOR CERTIFICATES AS INDEBTEDNESS

           Tax Counsel has advised Greenwood that, in their opinion, although
      the matter is not free from doubt, under Current Law the Investor
      Certificates will be treated as indebtedness of Greenwood for federal
      income tax purposes.  Such opinion is based, in part, upon (i) the
      expressed intent of Greenwood to treat the Investor Certificates for
      federal, state and local income and franchise tax purposes as
      indebtedness secured by the Receivables and other assets held in the
      Trust, (ii) the commitment of each Investor Certificateholder, by the
      acceptance of an Investor Certificate, similarly to treat the Investor
      Certificates for federal, state and local income and franchise tax
      purposes as indebtedness, (iii) Tax Counsel's conclusion that the federal
      income tax treatment of the Investor Certificates should be determined
      based on the economic substance of the arrangement created by the Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement, the Series Supplement and the Credit Enhancement
      Agreement and (iv) Tax Counsel's analysis of such economic substance.
      There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS or the courts will agree
      with the conclusions of Tax Counsel.  In that regard, the Pooling and
      Servicing Agreement and the Series Supplement generally refer to the
      transfer of the Receivables as a "sale," and Greenwood has informed Tax
      Counsel (i) that different criteria are used in determining the non-tax
      accounting treatment of the transaction and (ii) that, for regulatory and
      financial accounting purposes, Greenwood will treat the transfer of the
      Receivables under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Series
      Supplement as a transfer of an ownership interest in the Receivables and
      not as the creation of a debt obligation.  Notwithstanding the foregoing,
      Greenwood will treat the Investor Certificates as indebtedness for
      federal, state and local income and franchise tax purposes and the
      Investor Certificateholders, by acceptance of the Investor Certificates,
      agree to treat such Investor Certificates as indebtedness of Greenwood
      for federal, state and local income and franchise tax purposes.




                                       19

<PAGE>   20

           The above discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to
      the tax opinion that was filed as an exhibit to the Registration
      Statement containing the Prospectus to which this Annual Appendix
      relates.  Except for the discussion in "-- Possible Characterization of
      the Investor Certificates," the following discussion of federal income
      tax consequences assumes that the Investor Certificates will be treated
      as indebtedness of Greenwood for federal income tax purposes.

      UNITED STATES INVESTOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS

           The rules set forth below apply to Investor Certificateholders who
      are "United States Persons."  A "United States Person" is (i) a citizen
      or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation or partnership
      created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United
      States or of any state, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to
      United States federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv)
      generally, a trust if a court within the United States is able to 
      exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and 
      one or more United States fiduciaries have the authority to control all 
      substantial decisions of the trust.

           Stated Interest on Investor Certificates. Subject to the discussion
      below, interest paid on the Investor Certificates will be taxable as
      ordinary income when received or accrued by Investor Certificateholders
      in accordance with their method of accounting.  Generally, interest
      received on the Investor Certificates will constitute "investment income"
      for purposes of certain limitations of the Code concerning the
      deductibility of investment interest expense.

           Original Issue Discount.  In general, the excess of the stated
      redemption price at maturity of the Investor Certificates over their
      issue price will constitute original issue discount ("OID"), unless such
      excess is within a statutorily-defined de minimis exception.

           If the Investor Certificates are issued with OID, Investor
      Certificateholders generally will be required to include OID in income
      for each accrual period in advance of receipt of the cash representing
      such OID.  A holder of a debt instrument issued with OID is required to
      recognize as ordinary income the amount of OID on the debt instrument as
      such discount accrues, in accordance with a constant yield method.  Under
      Section 1272(a)(6) of the Code, special provisions apply to debt
      instruments on which payments may be accelerated due to prepayments of
      other obligations securing those debt instruments.  Under these
      provisions, the computation of OID (and market discount, see "-- Market
      Discount") on such debt instruments must be determined by taking into
      account both the prepayment assumptions used in pricing the debt
      instrument and the actual prepayment experience.  As a result, the amount
      of OID on such debt instruments that will accrue in any given accrual
      period may either increase or decrease depending upon the actual
      prepayment rate.  Because no Treasury Regulations have been issued
      interpreting  Section 1272(a)(6), Investor Certificateholders should
      consult their own tax 



                                       20

<PAGE>   21
      advisors regarding the impact of the OID rules in the event the Investor 
      Certificates are issued with OID.

           Market Discount.  Investor Certificateholders should be aware that
      the resale of an Investor Certificate may be affected by the market
      discount provisions of the Code.  These rules generally provide that,
      subject to a statutorily-defined de minimis exception, if an Investor
      Certificateholder acquires an Investor Certificate at a market discount
      (i.e., at a price below its stated redemption price at maturity or its
      revised issue price if it was issued with OID) and thereafter recognizes
      gain upon a disposition of the Investor Certificate (or disposes of it in
      certain non-recognition transactions such as a gift), the lesser of such
      gain (or appreciation, in the case of an applicable non-recognition
      transaction) or the portion of the market discount that accrued while the
      Investor Certificate was held by such Investor Certificateholder will be
      treated as ordinary interest income at the time of the disposition.  The
      market discount rules also provide that an Investor Certificateholder who
      acquires an Investor Certificate at a market discount may be required to
      defer a portion of any interest expense that otherwise may be deductible
      on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase or carry the 
      Investor Certificate until the Investor Certificateholder disposes of the
      Investor Certificate in a taxable transaction.

           Principal on the Investor Certificates will be paid in a single
      payment with respect to the Class A Certificates and a single payment
      with respect to the Class B Certificates, or will be paid monthly during
      the Amortization Period, if any.  An Investor Certificateholder who
      acquired an Investor Certificate at a market discount would be required
      to treat as ordinary interest income the portion of any principal payment
      attributable to accrued market discount on such Investor Certificate.

           An Investor Certificateholder who acquired an Investor Certificate
      at a market discount may elect to include market discount in income as
      the discount accrues, either on a ratable basis or, if elected, on a
      constant interest rate basis.  The current inclusion election, once made,
      applies to all market discount obligations acquired on or after the first
      day of the first taxable year to which the election applies, and may not
      be revoked without the consent of the IRS.  If an Investor
      Certificateholder elects to include market discount in income in
      accordance with the preceding sentence, the foregoing rules with respect
      to the recognition of ordinary income on sales, principal payments and
      certain other dispositions of the Investor Certificates and the deferral
      of interest deductions on indebtedness related to the Investor
      Certificates will not apply.

           Amortizable Bond Premium.  Generally, if the price or tax basis of 
      an Investor Certificate held as a capital asset exceeds the
      sum of all amounts payable on the Investor Certificate after the
      acquisition date (other than payments of qualified stated interest), such
      excess may constitute amortizable bond premium that the Investor
      Certificateholder may elect to amortize under the constant interest rate
      method over the period from the Investor Certificateholder's acquisition
      date to the Investor Certificate's maturity date.  Proposed Treasury
      Regulations which are not yet effective exclude debt instruments subject
      to Section 1272(a)(6) of the Code from the amortizable bond 

                                       21

<PAGE>   22
      premium rules contained in such regulations.  See discussion of Section 
      1272(a)(6) in "-- Original Issue Discount."  Amortizable bond premium 
      generally will be treated as an offset to interest income on the Investor 
      Certificate, rather than as a separate interest deduction item subject to 
      the investment interest limitations of the Code.  An Investor
      Certificateholder that elects to amortize bond premium must reduce the
      tax basis in the related Investor Certificate by the amount of bond
      premium used to offset interest income.  If an Investor Certificate
      purchased at a premium is redeemed in full prior to its maturity, an
      Investor Certificateholder who has elected to amortize bond premium
      should be entitled to a deduction for any remaining unamortized bond
      premium in the taxable year of redemption.

           Sales of Investor Certificates.  In general, an Investor
      Certificateholder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale, exchange,
      redemption or other taxable disposition of an Investor Certificate
      measured by the difference between (i) the amount of cash and the fair
      market value of any property received (other than the amount attributable
      to, and taxable as, accrued but unpaid interest) and (ii) the Investor
      Certificateholder's tax basis in the Investor Certificate (as increased
      by any OID or market discount previously included in income by the 
      Investor Certificateholder and decreased by any deductions previously 
      allowed for amortizable bond premium and by any payments reflecting 
      principal or OID received with respect to such Investor Certificate).

           Subject to the OID and market discount rules discussed above and to
      the one-year holding period requirement for long-term capital gain
      treatment, any such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain
      or loss, provided the Investor Certificate was held as a capital asset.
      The maximum federal income tax rate applicable to capital gains and
      ordinary income for corporations is 35%.  Moreover, capital losses
      generally may be used only to offset capital gains. The ordinary federal
      income tax rate for individuals, estates and trusts is 36% (for married
      individuals filing joint returns with taxable income in excess of
      $151,750 ($124,650 for unmarried individuals)) whereas the long-term
      capital gains rate for such taxpayers is 28%.  A further 10% surtax will
      be imposed on ordinary income of individuals with taxable incomes in
      excess of $271,050 (for married individuals filing joint returns and for
      unmarried individuals) and estates and trusts with taxable incomes in
      excess of $8,100 (thereby creating a maximum federal income tax rate to
      such taxpayers of 39.6%).

      FOREIGN INVESTOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS

           Set forth below is a general discussion of the United States federal
      income and estate tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, sale or
      other disposition of an Investor Certificate by an Investor
      Certificateholder that, for United States federal income tax purposes, is
      (i) a foreign corporation, (ii) a non-resident alien individual, (iii) a
      foreign estate or trust or (iv) a foreign partnership, as such terms are
      defined in the Code (a "non-U.S. Holder").  Some non-U.S. Holders
      (including certain residents of certain 



                                       22

<PAGE>   23
      United States possessions or territories) may be subject to special rules 
      not discussed herein.

           Interest (including OID, if any) paid to a non-U.S. Holder of
      Investor Certificates will not be subject to a required withholding of
      United States federal income tax, provided that (i) such interest
      payments are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
      business of the non-U.S. Holder within the United States and such
      non-U.S. Holder provides an appropriate statement to such effect, or (ii)
      (a) the holder is not (1) a "10 percent shareholder" of Greenwood or (2)
      a "controlled foreign corporation" with respect to which Greenwood is a
      "related person" within the meaning of the Code and (b) the beneficial
      owner (and, if relevant, a financial institution on the beneficial
      owner's behalf) provides an appropriate statement, signed under penalty
      of perjury, certifying that the beneficial owner of such Investor
      Certificate is not a United States Person and providing the beneficial
      owner's name and address.  The statement generally must be provided in
      the year a payment occurs or in either of the two preceding years.  For
      years after 1997, nonbinding Proposed Treasury Regulations specify that 
      the statement must be provided prior to payment.

           A non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to United States
      federal income tax on gain realized on the disposition of an Investor
      Certificate (other than gain attributable to accrued interest or OID,
      which is addressed in the preceding paragraph); provided that (i) the gain
      is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business 
      within the United States by the non-U.S. Holder and (ii) in the case of an
      individual holder, (A) the non-U.S. Holder is not present in the United 
      States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale, exchange or 
      redemption or (B)(1) the non-U.S. Holder does not have a "tax home" in 
      the United States and (2) the gain is not attributable to an office or 
      other fixed place of business maintained in the United States by the 
      non-U.S. Holder.

           If the interest or gain on an Investor Certificate held by a
      non-U.S. Holder is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
      business within the United States by the non-U.S. Holder, then the
      non-U.S. Holder (although exempt from the withholding of tax previously
      discussed if the non-U.S. Holder provides an appropriate statement)
      generally will be subject to United States federal income tax on the
      interest (including OID, if any) or gain at regular federal income tax
      rates in a similar fashion to a United States Person.  See "-- United
      States Investor Certificateholders."  In addition, if the non-U.S. Holder
      is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal
      to 30% of its "effectively connected earnings and profits" within the
      meaning of the Code for the taxable year, as adjusted for certain items,
      unless it qualifies for a lower rate under an applicable tax treaty.

           An Investor Certificate held by an individual who at the time of
      death is a non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to United States federal
      estate tax as a result of such individual's death if, immediately before
      death, (i) the individual was not a "10 percent shareholder" of Greenwood
      and (ii) interest on such Investor Certificate was not 

                                       23

<PAGE>   24
      effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the 
      United States by the individual.

           THE FOREGOING DESCRIPTION OF THE POTENTIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL
      INCOME AND ESTATE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS IS NECESSARILY
      INCOMPLETE.  NON-U.S. HOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS
      WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE FOREGOING MATTERS TO THEM.

      BACKUP WITHHOLDING AND INFORMATION REPORTING

           Information reporting requirements apply to certain payments of
      principal of and interest on (and the amount of OID, if any, accrued on)
      an obligation, and to proceeds of certain sales of an obligation before
      maturity, to certain nonexempt Investor Certificateholders who are United
      States Persons.  In addition, a backup withholding tax may also apply
      with respect to such amounts if such Investor Certificateholders fail to
      provide correct taxpayer identification numbers and other information.
      The backup withholding tax rate is 31%.  Greenwood, or a paying agent or
      a broker, as the case may be, will be required to withhold from any
      payment that is subject to backup withholding unless the Investor
      Certificateholder furnishes its taxpayer identification number in the
      manner prescribed in applicable Treasury Regulations and certain other
      conditions are met.

           In the case of payments of principal of, and interest on (and the
      amount of OID, if any, accrued on), Investor Certificates by Greenwood or
      its paying agents to non-U.S. Holders, Temporary Treasury Regulations
      provide that backup withholding and information reporting will not apply
      to payments with respect to which either requisite certification has been
      received or an exemption has otherwise been established (provided that
      neither Greenwood nor its paying agents has actual knowledge that the
      holder is a United States Person or that the conditions of any other
      exemption are not in fact satisfied).  Payments of the proceeds of the
      sale of an Investor Certificate to or through a foreign office of a
      United States broker or foreign brokers with certain types of
      relationships to the United States, however, are subject to certain
      information reporting requirements, unless the payee is an exempt
      recipient or such broker has evidence in its records that the payee is
      not a United States Person and no actual knowledge that such evidence is
      false and certain other conditions are met.  Temporary Treasury
      Regulations indicate that such payments are not currently subject to
      backup withholding.  Under current Treasury Regulations, payments of the
      proceeds of a sale to or through the United States office of a broker
      will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding unless
      the payee certifies under penalty of perjury as to his status as a
      non-U.S. Holder and certain other qualifications (and no agent of the
      broker who is responsible for receiving or reviewing such statement has
      actual knowledge that it is incorrect) and provides his name and address
      or the payee otherwise establishes an exemption.



                                       24

<PAGE>   25
           Treasury Department is studying the possible application of backup
      withholding to payments made by foreign offices of certain United States
      and United States related intermediaries, including brokers, as well as
      the standard of evidence required to prove foreign status for information
      reporting purposes.

           Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a
      payment to an Investor Certificateholder will be allowed as a refund or a
      credit against such Investor Certificateholder's United States federal
      income tax.

      POSSIBLE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INVESTOR CERTIFICATES

           The foregoing discussion assumes that the Investor Certificates will
      be treated as indebtedness of Greenwood for federal income tax purposes.
      However, although Tax Counsel has opined to such effect, the matter is
      not free from doubt, and there can be no assurance that the IRS or the
      courts will agree with Tax Counsel's opinion.  If the IRS were to contend
      successfully that the Investor Certificates are not indebtedness of
      Greenwood for federal income tax purposes, it could find that the
      arrangement created by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Series
      Supplement constitutes a partnership which could be treated as a 
      "publicly traded partnership" taxable as a corporation.

           If the Investor Certificates were treated as interests in a
      partnership, the partnership in all likelihood would be treated as a
      "publicly traded partnership."  If the partnership were nevertheless not
      taxable as a corporation (for example, because of an exception for a
      "publicly traded partnership" whose income is interest that is not derived
      in the conduct of a financial business), such partnership would not be
      subject to federal income tax.  Rather, the Investor Certificateholders
      would be required to include in income their share of the income and
      deductions generated by the assets of the Trust, as determined under
      partnership tax accounting rules.  In such event, the amount, timing and
      character of the income required to be recognized by an Investor
      Certificateholder could differ materially from the amount, timing and
      character thereof if the Investor Certificates were characterized as
      indebtedness of Greenwood.  It also is possible that such a partnership
      could be subject to tax in certain states where the partnership is
      considered to be engaged in business, and that the Investor
      Certificateholders, as partners in such a partnership, could be taxed on
      their share of the partnership's income in such states.

           In addition, if such a partnership is considered to be engaged in a
      trade or business within the United States, the partnership would be
      subject to a withholding tax on distributions to (or, at its election,
      income allocable to) non-U.S. Holders, and each such non-U.S. Holder
      would be credited for such non-U.S. Holder's share of the withholding tax
      paid by the partnership.  Moreover, the non-U.S. Holder generally would
      be subject to United States federal income tax at regular federal income
      tax rates, and possibly a branch profits tax (in the case of a corporate
      non-U.S. Holder), as previously described.  See "-- Foreign Investor
      Certificateholders."  Further, even if the partnership is not considered
      to be engaged in a trade or business within the United States, it appears
      that 

                                       25

<PAGE>   26
      partnership withholding will be required in the case of any such non-U.S. 
      Holder that is engaged in a trade or business within the United States to 
      which the Investor Certificate income is effectively connected.

           Alternatively, although there may be arguments to the contrary, it
      appears that if such a partnership is not considered to be engaged in a
      trade or business within the United States and if income with respect to
      an Investor Certificate is not otherwise effectively connected with the
      conduct of a trade or business within the United States by a non-U.S.
      Holder, the non-U.S. Holder would be subject to United States federal
      income tax and withholding at a rate of 30% (unless reduced by an
      applicable treaty) on such non-U.S. Holder's distributive share of the
      partnership's interest income.

           If the Investor Certificates were treated as interests in a
      "publicly traded partnership" taxable as a corporation, the income from
      the assets of the Trust would be subject to federal income tax and tax
      imposed by certain states where the entity would be considered to have
      operations at corporate rates, which would reduce the amounts available
      for distribution to the Investor Certificateholders.  See "Certain State
      Tax Consequences."  Under such circumstances, the Investor Certificates
      may be treated as debt of an entity taxable as a corporation or,
      alternatively, as equity of such an entity in which latter case interest
      payments to Investor Certificateholders could be treated as dividends
      and, if made to non-U.S. Holders, could be subject to United States
      federal income tax and withholding at a rate of 30% (unless reduced by an
      applicable tax treaty).

           Finally, the IRS might contend that even though the Class A
      Certificates are properly classified as debt obligations of Greenwood for
      federal income tax purposes, the Class B Certificates are not properly
      classified as such.  Under this approach, the Class B Certificates might 
      be viewed as equity interests in an entity (such as Greenwood or a joint 
      venture consisting of  Greenwood and the Class B Certificateholders), with
      the Class A Certificates treated as debt obligations of such entity.  If 
      such an entity were characterized as a partnership not taxable as a 
      corporation, the entity would not be subject to federal income tax, 
      although the Class B Certificateholders would be subject to the tax 
      consequences previously described with respect to interests in a 
      partnership that is not taxable as a corporation.  Alternatively, if such 
      an entity were characterized as a "publicly traded partnership" taxable as
      a corporation, the tax liability on the income of the entity might, in 
      certain circumstances, reduce distributions on both the Class A 
      Certificates and the Class B Certificates, and the Class B 
      Certificateholders would be subject to the tax consequences previously
      described with respect to interests in a "publicly traded partnership"
      taxable as a corporation.  In addition, any non-U.S. Holder of a Class A
      Certificate who is the actual or constructive owner of 10% or more of the
      outstanding principal amount of the Class B Certificates may be treated
      as a "10 percent shareholder."  See "-- Foreign Investor
      Certificateholders."

           Based on Tax Counsel's advice as to the likely treatment of the
      Investor Certificates for federal income tax purposes, Greenwood and the
      Trust will not attempt to cause the arrangement created by the Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement and the Series 

                                       26

<PAGE>   27
      Supplement to comply with the federal or state income tax reporting 
      requirements applicable to partnerships or corporations.  If such 
      arrangement were later held to constitute a partnership or corporation, 
      the manner of bringing it into compliance with such requirements is 
      unclear.

           Prospective Investor Certificateholders should consult their own tax
      advisors as to the risk that the Investor Certificates will not be treated
      as indebtedness of Greenwood, and the possible tax consequences of 
      potential alternative treatments.

      10. CERTAIN STATE TAX CONSEQUENCES

      Delete the text under the heading "Certain State Tax Consequences" on
pages 75-76 and substitute the following:

           The following summary of certain anticipated state tax consequences
      with respect to the Investor Certificates is based on the advice of Tax
      Counsel as counsel to Greenwood.  The summary is based upon currently
      applicable statutes, regulations and judicial and administrative rulings
      and decisions of certain states.  There can be no assurance that the
      taxing authorities of such states will not take a contrary view, and no
      ruling therefrom has been or will be sought.  Legislative, judicial or
      administrative changes may be forthcoming that could alter or modify the
      statements and conclusions set forth herein.  Any such changes or
      interpretations may or may not be retroactive and could affect the tax
      consequences to Investor Certificateholders.  Except as set forth below,
      this discussion of state tax consequences assumes that the Investor
      Certificates will be treated as indebtedness of Greenwood for federal tax
      purposes.

           State tax consequences to each Investor Certificateholder will
      depend upon the provisions of the state tax laws to which the Investor
      Certificateholder is subject.  Most states modify or adjust the taxpayer's
      federal taxable income to arrive at the amount of income potentially 
      subject to state tax.  Resident individuals usually pay state tax on 100% 
      of such state-modified income, while corporations and other taxpayers 
      generally pay state tax only on that portion of state-modified income 
      assigned to the taxing state under the state's own apportionment and 
      allocation rules.  Because each state's tax laws vary, it is impossible to
      predict the tax consequences to the Investor Certificateholders in all of
      the state taxing jurisdictions in which they are already subject to tax.

           Delaware is the location of Greenwood's headquarters, where
      Greenwood originates and owns the Accounts, and services the Receivables
      pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.  Tax Counsel has advised
      Greenwood, that, in their opinion, although the matter is not free from
      doubt, the Investor Certificates are treated as indebtedness of Greenwood
      for purposes of the Delaware income tax.  Accordingly, although the matter
      is not free from doubt, if the Investor Certificates are treated as 
      indebtedness of Greenwood in Delaware, Investor Certificateholders not
      otherwise 



                                       27

<PAGE>   28
      subject to taxation in Delaware will not become subject to the Delaware 
      income tax solely because of their ownership of the Investor Certificates.

           Generally, an Investor Certificateholder is required to pay, in
      states in which such an Investor Certificateholder already is subject to
      state tax, additional state tax as a result of interest earned on such
      Investor Certificateholder's investment in the Investor Certificates.
      Moreover, a state could claim that the Trust has undertaken activities
      therein and is subject to taxation by that state.  Were any state to make
      and sustain that claim, the treatment of the Investor Certificates for
      purposes of such state's tax laws would be determined thereunder, and
      there can be no assurance that the Investor Certificates would be treated
      as indebtedness of Greenwood for purposes of such state taxation.

           If such Investor Certificates were treated as interests in a
      partnership or a corporation, the state tax consequences to the Investor
      Certificateholders could be materially different, especially in states
      which may be considered to have a business connection with the
      Receivables.  See "Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences -- Possible
      Characterization of the Investor Certificates."

           THE FOREGOING DESCRIPTION OF THE POTENTIAL STATE TAX CONSEQUENCES IS
      INCOMPLETE.  INVESTOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN
      TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE FOREGOING MATTERS TO
      THEM.
 
      11. ERISA CONSIDERATIONS

      Delete the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs on page 77 and substitute
the following:

           If the Investor Certificates were deemed to be an extension of
      credit for ERISA purposes, the purchase of the Investor Certificates by a
      Plan with respect to which Greenwood or one of its affiliates is a "party 
      in interest" or "disqualified person" might be considered a prohibited 
      extension of credit under Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the 
      Code unless an exemption is applicable.  There are at least four 
      prohibited transaction class exemptions issued by the DOL that might 
      apply, depending in part on who decided to acquire the Investor 
      Certificates for the Plan:  DOL Prohibited Transaction Exemption ("PTE") 
      84-14 (Class Exemption for Plan Asset Transactions determined by 
      Independent Qualified Professional Asset Managers); PTE 91-38 (Class 
      Exemption for Certain Transactions Involving Bank Collective Investment 
      Funds); PTE 90-1 (Class Exemption for Certain Transactions Involving 
      Insurance Company Pooled Separate Accounts); and PTE 96-23 (Class 
      Exemption for Plan Asset Transactions Determined by In-House Asset 
      Managers).

           Moreover, whether the Investor Certificates are debt or equity for
      ERISA purposes, a possible violation of the prohibited transaction rules
      could occur if the Investor Certificates were purchased during the
      offering with assets of a Plan if Greenwood, the Trustee, any Underwriter
      or any of their affiliates were a fiduciary with 

                                       28

<PAGE>   29
      respect to such Plan.  Under ERISA and the Code, a person is a "fiduciary"
      with respect to a Plan to the extent (i) he or she exercises any 
      discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting management of 
      such Plan or exercises any authority or control respecting management or 
      disposition of its assets, (ii) he or she renders investment advice for a 
      fee or other compensation, direct or indirect, with respect to any moneys 
      or other property of such Plan, or has any authority or responsibility to 
      do so or (iii) he or she has any discretionary authority or discretionary 
      responsibility in the administration of such Plan.  Accordingly, the 
      fiduciaries of any Plan should not purchase the Investor Certificates 
      during the offering with assets of any Plan if Greenwood, the Trustee, the
      Underwriters or any of their affiliates is a fiduciary with respect to the
      Plan.

           In light of the foregoing, fiduciaries of Plans considering the
      purchase of the Investor Certificates should consult their own tax or
      other appropriate counsel regarding the application of ERISA and the Code
      to their purchase of the Investor Certificates.

           In particular, insurance companies considering the purchase of
      Investor Certificates should consult their own benefits counsel or other
      appropriate counsel with respect to the United States Supreme Court's
      decision in John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Harris Trust &
      Savings Bank, 114 S. Ct. 517 (1993) ("John Hancock"), DOL PTE 95-60
      (Class Exemption for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Company
      General Accounts) and Section 401(c) of ERISA.  In John Hancock, the
      Supreme Court held that the assets held in an insurance company's general
      account may be deemed to be "plan assets" under certain circumstances.
      Subject to numerous conditions and limitations, PTE 95-60 effectively
      reverses this portion of the holding in John Hancock.  Section 401(c) of
      ERISA was added by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 and
      requires the Secretary of Labor to issue final regulations by December
      31, 1997 which are to provide guidance for the purpose of determining, in
      cases where an insurer issues one or more policies (supported by the
      assets of the insurer's general account) to or for the benefit of an
      employee benefit plan, which assets of such insurer (other than assets
      held in a separate account) constitute "plan assets" for the purposes of
      the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the
      Code.  Such regulations shall only apply with respect to policies which
      are issued by an insurer on or before December 31, 1998, to or for the
      benefit of an employee benefit plan which is supported by the assets of
      such insurer's general account.  With respect to policies issued on or
      before December 31, 1998, such regulations shall take effect at the end
      of the 18-month period following the date on which such regulations
      become final.  Section 401(c) also provides that no person will be
      subject to liability under Section 4975 of the Code and the fiduciary
      responsibility provisions of ERISA on the basis of a claim that the
      assets of an insurer (other than assets held in a separate account) are
      "plan assets," for conduct occurring before the date which is 18 months
      following the date the final regulations become final.





                                       29

<PAGE>   30
           Accordingly, investors should analyze whether John Hancock, PTE
      95-60, Section 401(c) of ERISA and any regulations issued pursuant to
      Section 401(c) of ERISA may have an impact with respect to their purchase
      of Investor Certificates.

      12.  AVAILABLE INFORMATION

      Delete the text under the heading "Available Information" on pages 78-79
of the Prospectus and substitute the following:

           The Trust will be subject to the informational requirements of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, in accordance therewith,
      Greenwood, on behalf of the Trust, will file reports and other information
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission").  Such 
      reports filed by Greenwood on behalf of the Trust are available for 
      inspection without charge at the public reference facilities maintained by
      the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 
      20549; 7 World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New York 10048; and the
      Northwestern Atrium Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, 
      Illinois 60661-2511.  Such reports and other documents may also be 
      obtained from the web site that the Commission maintains at 
      http://www.sec.gov.

      13.  GLOSSARY OF TERMS

      a.   Delete the definition of "Charged-Off Amount" on page 85 of the
Prospectus and substitute the following:

           "Charged-Off Amount" will mean, with respect to any Trust
      Distribution Date, the aggregate amount of Receivables in Accounts that
      become Charged-Off Accounts in the related Due Period, less (i) the
      cumulative, uncollected amount previously billed by the Servicers to
      Accounts that became Charged-Off Accounts during the related Due Period
      with respect to finance charges, cash advance fees, annual membership
      fees, fees for transactions that exceed the credit limit on the Account,
      late payment charges and any other type of charges that the Servicer has
      designated as "Finance Charge Receivables" with respect to Accounts that
      are not Charged-Off Accounts and (ii) the full amount of any such 
      Receivables that have been repurchased by Greenwood on behalf of the 
      Holder of the Seller Certificate.

      b.   Delete the definition of "Finance Charge Receivables" on page 91 of
the Prospectus and substitute the following:

           "Finance Charge Receivables" with respect to any Account for any Due
      Period will mean the net amount billed by the Servicer during such Due
      Period as finance charges on such Account and cash advance fees, annual
      membership fees, fees for transactions that exceed the credit limit on
      such Account, late payment charges billed during such Due Period to such
      Account and any other charges that the Servicer may designate as "Finance
      Charge Receivables" from time to time (provided that the Servicer shall
      not designate amounts owing for the payment of goods and services or cash

                                       30

<PAGE>   31
      advances as "Finance Charge Receivables"), less, in the event that such
      Account becomes a Charged-Off Account during such Due Period, the
      cumulative, uncollected amount previously billed by the Servicer to such
      Account as finance charges, cash advance fees, annual membership fees, if
      any, fees for transactions that exceed the credit limit on such Account,
      late payment charges and any other type of charges that the Servicer has
      designated as "Finance Charge Receivables" with respect to Accounts that
      are not Charged-Off Accounts; provided, however, that in the event any
      Account that is included in the Accounts as of the Cut-Off Date is not
      selected before the beginning of the Due Period preceding the Due Period
      related to the first Trust Distribution Date, the Servicer may utilize a
      reasonable method of estimation to determine the amount of the Finance
      Charge Receivables with respect to such Account for the period beginning
      on the first day of such preceding Due Period and ending on the date on
      which such Account is selected.

      14.  GLOBAL CLEARANCE, SETTLEMENT AND TAX DOCUMENTATION PROCEDURES
           (ANNEX 1)

      a.   Delete the last line under the subheading "Exemption for non-U.S.
Holders (Form W-8)" on page 105 and substitute the following:

           If the beneficial owner becomes a United States citizen or resident
      during the period to which the statement relates, or certain other 
      changes in circumstances occur, such change must be communicated to the
      appropriate party within 30 days thereof.  Form W-8 is generally
      effective for three calendar years, but a new certificate may be required
      to be filed by the recipient each time a payment is made.

      b.   Add as the last line to the first paragraph under the subheading 
"U.S. Federal Income Tax Reporting Procedure" on page 105:

           Certain proposed (nonbinding) regulations which would be applicable
      to payments made after 1997, provide for the unification and
      simplification of certain current certificate procedures.

      c.   Delete the last paragraph on page 105 and substitute the following:

           The term "U.S. Holder" means (i) a citizen or resident of the United
      States, (ii) a corporation or partnership organized in or under the laws
      of the United States or any state, (iii) an estate the income of which is
      includible in gross income for United States tax purposes, regardless of
      its source, or (iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able
      to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and
      one or more United States fiduciaries have the authority to control all
      substantial decisions of the trust.

                                    31


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission