<PAGE> 1
================================================================================
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-21314
U.S. CAN CORPORATION
------------------------------
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
06-1094196
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
DELAWARE
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)
900 COMMERCE DRIVE
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, INCLUDING ZIP CODE)
(630) 571-2500
(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
------------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par
value $0.01.
------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
As of February 28, 1997, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of U.S. Can Corporation was approximately $158,775,156.
As of February 28, 1997, 12,995,230 shares of Common Stock were outstanding.
------------------------------
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of U.S. Can Corporation's 1997 Proxy Statement are incorporated
in Part III hereof by reference.
================================================================================
<PAGE> 2
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C> <C>
PART I
Item 1. Business.................................................... 4
Item 2. Properties.................................................. 13
Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Regulatory Matters.................... 15
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 16
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.... 16
Item 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 17
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................... 19
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 27
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.................................... 56
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 56
Item 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 56
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management.................................................. 56
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 56
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form
8-K......................................................... 56
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 3
INCLUSION OF FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
CERTAIN STATEMENTS UNDER THE CAPTIONS "BUSINESS," "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS" AND ELSEWHERE IN
THIS REPORT CONSTITUTE "FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" WITHIN THE MEANING OF
SECTION 21E(I)(1) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE
KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE THE
ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE COMPANY, OR INDUSTRY RESULTS,
TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. SUCH FACTORS INCLUDE,
AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE FOLLOWING: GENERAL ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS AND MARKET
CONDITIONS, CHANGES IN PRODUCT DEMAND, CHANGES IN COMPETITION, THE ABILITY OF
THE COMPANY TO INTEGRATE ACQUISITIONS OR COMPLETE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS, INTEREST
RATE FLUCTUATIONS, CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS, DEPENDENCE ON RAW MATERIAL PRODUCERS,
DEPENDENCE ON AND AVAILABILITY OF QUALIFIED PERSONNEL, CHANGES IN OR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS INCLUDING ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, ABILITY TO
OBTAIN ADEQUATE FINANCING IN THE FUTURE AND OTHER FACTORS INDICATED IN THE
COMPANY'S REGISTRATION STATEMENTS AND REPORTS (INCLUDING THIS REPORT). THESE
IMPORTANT FACTORS MAY ALSO CAUSE THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MADE BY THE
COMPANY IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE CONTAINED UNDER THE
CAPTIONS "BUSINESS" AND "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS" TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ACTUAL
RESULTS ACHIEVED BY THE COMPANY. IN LIGHT OF THESE AND OTHER UNCERTAINTIES, THE
INCLUSION OF A FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE REGARDED AS A
REPRESENTATION BY THE COMPANY THAT THE COMPANY'S PLANS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE
ACHIEVED.
3
<PAGE> 4
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
References in this Report to the "Company" mean U.S. Can Corporation and
its subsidiaries, collectively, unless the context otherwise requires; and
references to "U.S. Can" mean solely United States Can Company and, unless the
context otherwise requires, does not include U.S. Can's foreign subsidiaries
(collectively referred to as "USC Europe"). U.S. Can Corporation is a Delaware
corporation, which owns all of U.S. Can's outstanding capital stock. The
references in this Report to market positions or market share are based on
information derived from annual reports, trade publications and management
estimates which the Company believes to be reliable.
The Company is a leading manufacturer of steel containers for personal care
products and household, automotive, paint and industrial supplies, with four
major product groups: (i) aerosol; (ii) paint and general line; (iii) metal
services; and (iv) custom and specialty. The Company believes it currently has
the number one or two market share in each of these product groups. The Company
manufactures an expansive line of aerosol containers for consumer and household
products in the United States and Europe. In paint, plastic and general line,
U.S. Can produces metal and plastic, round and oblong containers, pails and
drums for paints, coatings and industrial products. U.S. Can provides metal
services including secondary steel, shearing, slitting, coating, and lithography
of tin mill products for customers inside and outside of the container industry.
U.S. Can manufactures a wide variety of custom and specialty tins, decorative
containers and products.
The Company conducts its principal business operations in the general
packaging (non-food and non-beverage) segment of the metal container industry.
Management believes that U.S. Can offers the widest range of aerosol, round,
general line and specialty metal containers in the general packaging industry in
the United States. Full-color, quality lithographed containers are available in
a wide range of styles and sizes. The Company's aerosol cans, round and general
line cans and custom and specialty and other containers are sold to many
well-known consumer products manufacturers in the United States and Europe,
including The Sherwin-Williams Company, S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., The Gillette
Company ("Gillette"), The Glidden Company, The Procter & Gamble Company, Reckitt
& Coleman Inc. and Henkel Kommanditgeselschaft. These customers are among the
largest customers of the Company.
PRODUCTS
Aerosol
The Company is the leader in sales of aerosol containers in the United
States, accounting for more than one of every two aerosol cans sold
domestically. Aerosol containers represent the Company's largest product line,
accounting for approximately 45.6% of the Company's sales in 1996, and are used
to package personal care, household, automotive, paint and various other
products. The Company offers a wide range of aerosol containers in order to meet
its customers' requirements, including stylized necked-in cans and barrier-pack
cans used for products such as shaving gel.
In September 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of the five
aerosol can businesses comprising USC Europe from Crown Cork & Seal Company,
Inc. ("Crown") for $52.8 million and assumption of net indebtedness of $5.8
million (collectively, the "USC Europe Acquisition"). A working capital
adjustment of at least $1.7 million is expected to be made in favor of the
Company, reducing the net cash paid to approximately $51.1 million. This
acquisition included manufacturing operations in the United Kingdom, France,
Spain and Germany and the aerosol can manufacturing equipment and assets from a
Crown facility in
4
<PAGE> 5
Italy. USC Europe produced approximately 24% of all steel aerosol cans sold in
Europe in 1996, and, as a group, constituted the second largest manufacturer of
steel aerosol cans in Europe. The Company's agreement with Crown to purchase USC
Europe contains a non-competition provision which materially restricts Crown's
ability to compete for USC Europe's customers prior to September 11, 1997.
Separately, the Company commenced development of a new aerosol container
manufacturing facility in Merthyr Tydfil, Wales, in part to service a long-term
purchase commitment from Gillette. In October 1996, U.S. Can received written
confirmation of Gillette's intention to purchase certain annual unit volumes of
aerosol cans from U.S. Can, including U.S. Can's European operations, through
1998, with the option to extend for an additional period, subject to price
adjustment for actual volumes purchased. U.K. Can, Ltd. (one of the USC Europe
companies) has acquired a 320,000 square-foot facility in Merthyr Tydfil, for
the establishment of this new manufacturing facility. It is not U.S. Can's
policy to have any plant devoted exclusively to one customer and management
plans to service other customers from this facility. Prior to this long-term
commitment, neither U.S. Can nor USC Europe supplied Gillette in Europe. The
Company expects to begin manufacturing at Merthyr Tydfil in mid-1997.
Paint and General Line
Paint and general line containers, which include containers such as round
cans for paint and coatings, oblong cans for products such as turpentine and
charcoal lighter, and pails and other containers for industrial and consumer
products, accounted for the second largest portion of the Company's sales,
approximately 26.8%, for 1996. Management estimates that U.S. Can is second in
market share in the United States, on a unit volume basis, in steel round and
general line containers. U.S. Can produced approximately 42% of all steel round
and general line containers sold in the United States during 1996. In September
1996, U.S. Can entered into a container supply agreement with a major coatings
customer. Under this agreement, this customer purchases round containers for its
plants in several locations throughout the United States. This customer has
agreed to purchase certain estimated quantities of round containers per contract
year. This agreement extends until March 2001, subject to termination for
material breach by either party. Under this agreement, prices and volumes may be
adjusted due to changes in certain raw materials cost, certain competitive
offers and/or availability of new types of containers. U.S. Can has established
a paint and general line manufacturing facility in the Dallas, Texas area to
accommodate the increased demand of this customer. Other customers are also
serviced from this plant. U.S. Can's largest customers for its paint and general
line containers include Sherwin-Williams and Glidden.
U.S. Can has expanded into plastic container manufacturing to offer its
customers a wider choice of packaging options. In 1995, U.S. Can purchased
Plastite Corporation ("Plastite"), whose proprietary product line of plastic
containers makes U.S. Can the nation's largest producer of plastic paint cans
for customers such as PPG Industries, Inc. In August 1996, U.S. Can acquired CPI
Plastics, Inc., CP Ohio, Inc. and CP Illinois, Inc. (collectively, the "CPI
Group") for approximately $15.1 million, expanding U.S. Can's plastic container
line and customer base. As a result of these acquisitions, U.S. Can now produces
molded drums, pails and other plastic containers and products, and has added new
customers, including Olin Corporation ("Olin"), a maker of swimming pool
chemicals, petrochemical producers Shell Oil, Valvoline International, Inc., and
Texaco, Inc., and other well known companies, such as United States Gypsum Co.,
whose products utilize plastic packaging. Plastic products accounted for
approximately 2.1% of the Company's sales in 1995 and 4.0% of the Company's
sales in 1996.
Metal Services
Management believes that the Company is the leading supplier of metal
coating and decorating to third party customers in the United States. The
Company's metal services operations also provide secondary steel and other tin
mill services for customers inside and outside of the container business. The
Company operates full service metal decorating and service facilities serving a
variety of customers including Ross Laboratories, Houston Foods Co., and Golden
Harvest, as well as companies within the container and packaging industry,
including Silgan Containers Corp., Ball Corporation and White Cap, Inc. Revenues
from metal services accounted for approximately 10.0% of the Company's sales in
1995 and approximately 13.0% in 1996. The
5
<PAGE> 6
Company provides customers with the advantages of quality lithography, large
press size, substantial experience in metal coating and lithography, coupled
with operational advantages, including significant capacity and convenient
geographic positioning that allow the Company to be sensitive to delivery costs
and time constraints. In April 1996, the Company more than doubled its metal
services business, on a pro forma basis, through the acquisition of Alltrista
Metal Services ("AMS"), a division of Alltrista Corporation ("Alltrista"), which
had 1995 sales of approximately $88 million. In connection with the AMS
acquisition, the Company entered into a long-term agreement to supply tin plate
to Alltrista's home canning business.
Custom and Specialty
The Company significantly increased its presence in the custom and
specialty products market in 1994 through acquisitions and has expanded its
product lines to include a wide array of functional and decorative containers
and tins, caps and closures, and metal housewares and collectible items, serving
customers such as Wyeth Laboratories, Keebler Co. Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Included in this line are hermetic containers and slipcover tins of both
three-piece and seamless construction, manufactured in round and off-round
configurations; standard and custom closures, fitments, and stampings; and metal
trading cards, posters, serving trays, canister sets, dust pans and waste
baskets. In 1996, custom and specialty products experienced a significant
expansion in the highly customized promotional container market (e.g., metal
packaging for Liz Claiborne's Curve product line and Fossil accessories) and
growth in its licensed product operations (e.g., Norman Rockwell and The
Saturday Evening Post products). The Company believes it offers the industry's
widest range of custom and specialty products, enabling it to compete as a full
service metal decoration and specialty products provider with a large number of
manufacturers, none of which competes across the Company's entire product
spectrum. Custom and specialty contributed sales of approximately $77 million or
9.7% of the Company's sales in 1996.
Engineering Center
The Company acquired the Orlando Machine Engineering Center ("OMEC") in
1994. OMEC manufactures a full line of Callahan manufacturing machinery and a
variety of other new can manufacturing equipment ranging from small bench model
seamers to large production presses, as well as specialized equipment such as
water testers and compound lining machines. OMEC also offers a wide range of
value-added, rebuilt can-making machinery, including feeders, slitters,
flangers, seamers, liners, presses and scroll shears. OMEC utilizes the latest
in computer-controlled technology to design and build high quality tool and die
sets for the can industry, and is a leading supplier of quality spare parts for
the Callahan line, Bruderer and Bliss presses, Angelus seamers and many other
packaging equipment lines. OMEC's extensive capabilities allow U.S. Can to
perform in-house overhaul, repair and engineering support services formerly
contracted to outside machine shops.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In January 1997, U.S. Can acquired certain assets from Owens-Illinois
Closure Inc. ("O-I") for cash consideration of $10 million, which is subject to
adjustment based upon the actual value of the inventory acquired and potential
contingent payments of up to $1.5 million based upon realization of certain new
business which O-I was seeking at the time of the acquisition. The assets
acquired by U.S. Can include machinery, equipment, inventory and raw materials
of O-I's Erie, Pennsylvania metal business. O-I will operate these lines for up
to one year, pending relocation into one or more of U.S. Can's plants. U.S. Can
and O-I also entered into a one-year supply agreement whereby O-I will supply
all of U.S. Can's requirements of liner material for the unishell closures
manufactured on the Erie metal lines.
In December 1996, U.K. Can, Ltd. entered into (and U.S. Can guaranteed) a
$30 million credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation, to
finance (and secured by) the land, building and equipment comprising the Merthyr
Tydfil aerosol can manufacturing facility.
The Company executed a lease in December 1996 for a building in Voghera,
Italy for the relocation of aerosol can manufacturing assets from a Crown
facility in Italy. The Company has taken occupancy of the
6
<PAGE> 7
building and anticipates commencement of manufacturing capability at this
location during the second quarter of 1997.
In October 1996, the Company issued $275 million of 10 1/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2006 (the "Notes") in a private placement. Net proceeds
from the issuance of the Notes were $268.1 million, $158.4 million of which were
used to partially repay amounts borrowed under U.S. Can's bank credit agreement
(the "Credit Agreement") and $109.7 million of which were placed in an escrow
account and used in January 1997 to redeem U.S. Can's $100 million of 13 1/2%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2002 (the "13 1/2% Notes") at a premium and pay
the related accrued interest on the 13 1/2% Notes. In March 1997, the Company
completed a registered exchange offer, exchanging all of the Notes for Series B
10 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 (the "Exchange Notes"). The Exchange
Notes are substantially identical (including principal amount, interest rate,
maturity and redemption rights) to the Notes, except that holders of Exchange
Notes generally will not be entitled to registration rights. Both the Notes and
Exchange Notes have been issued under the indenture (the "Indenture") dated as
of October 17, 1996, among the Company, U.S. Can and Harris Trust and Savings
Bank, as trustee. For a more complete description of the Exchange Notes and the
Indenture, see Note (5) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 8 of this Report.
ACQUISITIONS
The Company was formed in 1983 through the purchase of the container
division of Sherwin-Williams by an investor group led by William J. Smith, the
Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Strategic
acquisitions were a major element of the Company's historic growth strategy. The
Company more than doubled its sales in its first four years by acquiring the
aerosol manufacturing facilities of Southern Can Company and the general
packaging business of Continental Can Company, USA, Inc. ("CCC").
Since 1983, the Company has completed a total of 23 acquisitions. Initially
the Company's acquisition strategy focused on aerosol and paint and general line
can-making operations. More recently, growth has focused on expanding into
related products and line extensions as well as new market areas. These
acquisitions have strengthened and expanded the Company's product lines and
geographical presence and have enabled it to serve the needs of an expanding
list of major customers. The Company's management has consistently been able to
improve the operating margins of acquired businesses through consolidation,
operating synergies, cost reduction and increased manufacturing efficiency.
The Company has, for the past several years, realized additional sales as a
result of its significant acquisition activity. While the Company has
historically aggressively sought acquisitions to implement its growth
strategies, these objectives have largely been met with the consummation of the
acquisitions in 1996. However, the Company plans to continue to evaluate and
selectively pursue acquisitions which it believes are strategically important to
meeting its customers needs, attracting new customers, adding new products,
complementing its existing business and expanding its geographic reach.
7
<PAGE> 8
The following table lists the Company's acquisitions since 1983 all of
which were consummated by the Company's United States operating entity, U.S.
Can:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR
COMPLETED BUSINESS OR ASSETS ACQUIRED PRODUCT LINES PURCHASE PRICE
- --------- --------------------------- ------------- --------------
<C> <S> <C> <C> <C>
1985 # Southern Can Company Aerosol $32.0 million(1)
1986 * General Can Company -- Alsip Paint and General Line $ 0.4 million
1987 # CCC General Packaging Business Aerosol/Paint and General Line $65.0 million(2)
1988 * General Can Custom and Specialty $ 1.1 million
1992 * ANC--Sparrows Point Metal Services $ 7.3 million
1992 * Fein Container Corporation Paint and General Line $ 7.0 million
1992 * ANC--General Packaging Aerosol/Paint and General Line $14.7 million
1993 * Olsher Metals Processing Corporation Metal Services $ 8.8 million(1)
1993 * Spencer Containers, Inc. Custom and Specialty $ 0.1 million
1994 @ Steeltin Can Corporation Custom and Specialty/ Metal $20.7 million(1)
Services/Paint and General
Line
1994 * Alsip facility from Ball Corporation Metal Services $ 4.6 million
1994 * Midwest Can Company Oblong Containers $ 0.5 million
1994 # Ellisco, Inc. Custom and Specialty/ Metal $32.2 million
Services
1994 # Rollason Engineering and Manufacturing, Equipment Overhaul/ Repair $ 1.4 million(3)
Inc. Packaging Industry
1994 * Grafco Industries, L.P. Custom and Specialty $ 1.1 million
1995 # Metal Litho International Metal Services $14.3 million(1)
1995 * Prospect Industries Corporation Paint and General Line $ 8.8 million
1995 # Hunter Container Corporation Custom and Specialty $ 6.5 million(1)
1995 # Plastite Corporation Plastics $ 7.3 million(4)
1996 * AMS Metal Services $14.9 million(5)
1996 # CPI Group Plastics $15.1 million(6)
1996 @ USC Europe Aerosol $52.8 million(7)
1997 * Erie Metal Business from Owens-Illinois Custom and Specialty $10.0 million(8)
Closures, Inc.
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
* Indicates acquisition of assets of the business by U.S. Can.
# Indicates acquisition of stock of the entity. In all cases of stock
acquisitions, except USC Europe, the entities were subsequently merged into
the purchasing entity, U.S. Can. USC Europe which is comprised of individual
operating entities in each country (United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain
and Italy), is operated as a group of wholly-owned direct and indirect
subsidiaries of U.S. Can.
@ Indicates acquisition of stock of an entity together with additional asset
acquisition by U.S. Can.
(1) Included assumption of debt in conjunction with acquisition.
(2) Included $55.0 million face amount of Class 1 Preferred Stock of the
Company.
(3) Included $1.0 million in the Company's Common Stock and assumption of debt
in conjunction with acquisition.
(4) Plus future contingencies not to exceed $2.5 million in the aggregate.
(5) In a related transaction, U.S. Can purchased inventory from Alltrista for
approximately $8.0 million on an installment basis.
(6) Plus future contingencies not to exceed $1.0 million in the aggregate.
8
<PAGE> 9
(7) Included assumption of $5.8 million in net indebtedness and subject to a
post-closing adjustment for changes in working capital from April 30, 1996
to September 11, 1996, the closing date of the USC Europe Acquisition. The
post-closing adjustment is expected to be at least $1.7 million in favor of
the Company, reducing the net cash paid to approximately $51.1 million.
(8) Subject to a post-closing adjustment for inventory acquired plus future
contingencies not to exceed $1.5 million in the aggregate.
SALES
The Company's sales are derived from five major groupings: (i) aerosol
cans, (ii) paint and general line containers, (iii) metal services, (iv) custom
and specialty products and (v) international. The following table sets forth the
percentage of sales contributed by each of these areas for each of the last
three fiscal years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Aerosol.............................................. 56.6% 50.8% 45.6%
Paint and general line (including plastic)........... 28.7 28.2 26.8
Metal services....................................... 5.3 10.0 13.0
Custom and specialty products, and other............. 9.4 11.0 10.2
International........................................ -- -- 4.4
</TABLE>
CUSTOMERS
As of December 31, 1996, in the United States, the Company had
approximately 9,000 customers for its products, as compared to approximately
6,600 and 6,500 customers as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The
Company's 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 32.2% of sales for
1996, and 33.3% and 35.1% of sales in 1995 and 1994, respectively. No single
customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's sales during 1996, 1995 or
1994.
In accordance with industry practice, the Company enters into one-year or
multi-year supply agreements with its major customers. These agreements specify
the number of containers a customer will purchase (or the mechanism for
determining such number), pricing, volume discounts (if any) and, in the case of
many of the Company's multi-year supply agreements, a provision permitting the
Company to pass through announced price increases in certain raw material costs.
In the United States, U.S. Can markets its products primarily through a
sales force comprised of inside and outside sales representatives. Beginning in
1994, the sales force was organized to reflect the Company's increased presence
in Metal Services and Custom and Specialty Products and is now comprised of five
groups--the Aerosol Sales group, the Paint and General Line Sales group, the
Metal Services Sales group, the Custom and Specialty Sales group and the OMEC
sales group. In total, as of February 1, 1997, the Company had 63 outside sales
representatives and 58 inside sales representatives working in the domestic
market. In Europe, USC Europe has an experienced sales force in all five
countries. The Company has eight inside sales representatives and eight outside
sales representatives working in Europe. Management believes that its
experienced sales force with extensive customer relationships is a significant
competitive advantage.
As of December 31, 1996, the amount of domestic open orders from customers
(backlog) was approximately $58.8 million. As of December 31, 1995, such backlog
was approximately $54 million. The Custom and Specialty Products line tends to
be slightly more seasonal than the aerosol, round and general lines but, as a
whole, U.S. Can's backlog does not vary to any material degree because of
seasonality. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations - Seasonality."
RAW MATERIALS
The Company's principal raw materials are tin-plated steel ("tin plate")
and coatings and inks used to print its customers' designs and logos onto the
tin plate. U.S. Can purchases tin plate principally from domestic steel
manufacturers, with a minor portion purchased from Asian and European mills.
Both U.S. Can
9
<PAGE> 10
and USC Europe primarily rely on local mills to satisfy their plants' tin plate
requirements, but may also buy tin plate from other suppliers. Tin plate
accounted for approximately 85% of U.S. Can's total raw material purchases in
1996. Periodically, U.S. Can's major suppliers announce increases in prices for
tin plate and, in September 1996, they announced an increase of 2 3/4% in the
price of tin plate, effective January 5, 1997. Historically, U.S. Can has been
able to negotiate lower price increases than those announced by its major
suppliers. However, there can be no assurance that U.S. Can will be successful
in negotiating lower price increases with respect to future price increases.
Many of U.S. Can's multi-year supply agreements with its customers permit it to
pass through announced price increases in certain raw material costs. However,
historically, U.S. Can has not always been able to immediately offset increases
in tin plate prices with price increases on its products.
The Company believes that adequate quantities of tin plate will continue to
be available from steel manufacturers. The individual suppliers of raw materials
accounting for more than 10% of the total steel used by U.S. Can in 1996 were
USX's U.S. Steel group, Weirton Steel Corporation and LTV Corporation. The
percentage of total raw materials supplied to U.S. Can by each of these
suppliers ranged from approximately 25% to approximately 32% for the year ended
December 31, 1996.
Periodically, USC Europe's major suppliers have announced price increases
for tin plate. Historically, Crown and its subsidiaries have on occasion been
able to negotiate lower price increases and/or later effective dates than those
announced by their major suppliers. However, there can be no assurance that USC
Europe will be successful in negotiating lower price increases or later
effective dates with respect to future price increases, if any. Although supply
agreements with customers often permit USC Europe to pass on announced raw
material cost increases in form of higher prices, USC Europe has not always been
able to fully offset increases in tin plate prices.
The Company has not historically entered into written supply contracts with
steel makers and believes that other can manufacturers follow the same practice.
The Company allocates its purchases among steel makers on the basis of price and
performance, and uses a structured quality and service rating system which
monitors each supplier's performance on a monthly basis. Typically, the Company
reaches an oral agreement with each of its domestic tin plate suppliers on the
volume of the Company's purchases and pricing once per calendar year, based on
good faith estimates. Pricing is subject to renegotiation if the steel maker's
raw material costs increase or decrease. Since the inception of the Company, the
annual steel price agreements have not been renegotiated for any reason.
Agreements with foreign steel makers are substantially similar.
The Company's second largest raw material expense is for coatings and inks,
which are used to print designs and logos onto the tin plate prior to assembly.
Coatings and inks accounted for approximately 9% of U.S. Can's raw material
costs in fiscal year 1996 and are purchased from indigenous suppliers. Based on
the ready availability of these materials in the past and the number of
manufacturers which continue to make these products, management does not
anticipate any lack of availability of coatings and inks in the foreseeable
future.
The Company's plastic products are produced from two main types of resin,
which is a petroleum or natural gas product. High density polyethylene resin is
used to make pails, drums and agricultural products. 100% post-industrial and
consumer use, recycled polyethylene or polypropolene resin is used in the
production of the Plastite line of paint cans. The price of resin fluctuates
significantly and management believes that it is standard industry practice, as
well as the Company's contractual right/obligation in many of its supply
agreements, to pass on increases and decreases in resin prices to the customer.
LABOR
As of February 1, 1997, in the United States, the Company employed
approximately 4,065 salaried and hourly employees. At that date, there were
2,477 employees who were members of various labor unions, including the United
Steelworkers of America ("USWA"), the International Association of Machinists
("IAM"), Local 810 of the Steel, Metals, Alloys and Hardware Fabricators and
Warehousemen (affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
("Teamsters")), the Sheet Metal Workers of America ("SMWA"), Graphic
Communications International Union ("GCIU"), International Leather Goods,
10
<PAGE> 11
Plastic, Novelty and Service Workers Union ("ILGPNSWU"), and the International
Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers,
AFL-CIO ("IUE"). Unionized employees constitute approximately 61% of the
Company's total workforce. The labor agreement with a local unit of the USWA,
covering approximately 240 employees at the Hubbard, Ohio facility, was ratified
in early March 1996. A new agreement with the IAM, covering approximately 80
employees at U.S. Can's Racine, Wisconsin facility, was completed in March 1996.
In September 1996, the Company completed negotiations with the ILGPNSWU, Local
No. 359 at its Newnan, Georgia plant for the renewal of a labor agreement
covering approximately 95 employees. In December 1996, the labor agreement with
the USWA, covering approximately 419 employees at the Elgin, Illinois plant, was
extended to June 2001. The Company concluded negotiations at its Midwest Litho
Center in Alsip, Illinois, to discontinue its operations involving the GCIU's
unit of approximately 20 employees. At that same facility, negotiations are
underway to renew the extended agreement with the Teamsters bargaining unit of
about 72 employees which expired in January 1997. The Company has begun
negotiations with the USWA at the Chicago Metal Services plant to renew an
agreement covering approximately 100 employees scheduled to expire in March
1997. The Company's labor agreement with a local unit of the GCIU, covering
approximately 83 employees at the Trenton, New Jersey Litho Center, was renewed
for a three-year period commencing in March 1996. The labor agreement with the
USWA, covering approximately 100 employees at the Columbiana, Ohio plant, was
renewed for three years in April 1996.
USC Europe employed approximately 650 people at the end of 1996. The
Company believes that its workforce is skilled and committed, as demonstrated
over the last five years by increasing productivity and very limited work
stoppage due to labor disputes. The workforce is trained in industry-best
practices, combining the skills and know-how of recent can-making developments
from leaders in aerosols on both sides of the Atlantic and is, therefore, one of
the most valuable assets of USC Europe. In line with common European practices,
all plants are unionized. The management of the Company believes that labor
relations are excellent at all plants. Each of USC Europe's plants is managed by
an experienced management team, comprising in most cases a managing director,
plant manager, sales manager and finance manager.
In the United States, the Company has followed a labor strategy designed to
enhance its flexibility and productivity through constructive relations with its
employees and collective bargaining units. Elements of this strategy have
included implementation of flexible staff schedules, plant-level profit sharing
plans and plants staffed entirely by salaried workers. Management believes the
401(k) plan first negotiated at U.S. Can's Elgin, Illinois plant is unique in
the packaging industry and provides incentives for local performance, while
reducing the Company's exposure to defined benefit plan costs traditionally
bargained for by unions. During the last four years, the Company has expanded
this plan to include local bargaining units at several of its domestic plants.
Management believes the Company and its employees have benefited from
dealing directly with local unions in order to tailor their contracts to local
employee issues. In the future, management intends to negotiate separately with
the unions at acquired plants to reach individual site contracts with the
respective local bargaining units. This policy has the effect of staggering
renewal negotiations with the various bargaining units. Management believes the
Company's relations with its employees and their collective bargaining units are
generally good, as evidenced by the fact that the Company has had only two work
stoppages in its history: a five-day work stoppage at the Horsham, Pennsylvania
facility in November 1992, and a one-day work stoppage at the now-closed San
Leandro, California facility in June 1988.
COMPETITION
The principal methods of competition in the general packaging industry are
price, quality and service. The Company believes that it competes favorably in
each of these areas. The Company can also compete more effectively by reducing
manufacturing costs and enhancing operating efficiencies through investments in
capital equipment and technology. Price competition in the industry is vigorous
and limits the Company's ability to increase prices. Generally, customers of all
general line containers are demanding more consistent product availability with
shorter lead times. Because aerosol cans are used for personal care, household
and other packaged products, and because they are pressurized, aerosol cans are
more sensitive to quality, can decoration and other consumer-oriented features
than paint and general line containers.
11
<PAGE> 12
Competition has increased in the general packaging industry as a result of
mature markets, customer consolidations and consolidation within the container
industry. In steel aerosol containers, U.S. Can competes primarily with Crown
and BWAY Corporation. Crown is larger and has greater financial resources than
the Company. USC Europe competes in the steel aerosol market with the combined
Crown/CarnaudMetalbox operations (subject to the terms of a one-year
non-compete, summarized below), the German container manufacturer,
Schmalbach-Lubeca/Continental Can Europe (which has announced it will be
acquired by Viag), the German aerosol manufacturer, Staehle, and a group of
other smaller regional producers. Domestically, U.S. Can also competes with
Advanced Monobloc and two other smaller firms which manufacture aluminum aerosol
containers. In Europe, USC Europe competes with aluminum aerosol container
manufacturers, Alusuisse-Lonza Holding AG/Boxal and Pechiney International,
S.A./Cebal.
The USC Europe Acquisition represented the sale by Crown of various aerosol
operations in Europe, which sale was mandated by the stipulation of the European
Economic Communities European Merger Task Force in connection with Crown's
merger with CarnaudMetalbox. The mandate provides various conditions to the
terms of the sale by Crown, including limitations on competition for customers
of the various aerosol operations. Thus, in compliance with the terms of the
stipulation, the terms of the Company's agreement with Crown to purchase USC
Europe include a non-compete. For one year, Crown is prohibited from competing
for the business of customers who were, prior to the purchase, served by USC
Europe to the extent that such competition would lessen the volume of products
historically purchased from USC Europe by such customers. Excepted from this
non-compete are customers who, with the approval of the Commission of European
Communities and in good faith, decline to purchase aerosol cans from USC Europe.
In paint and general line, the Company competes primarily with BWAY
Corporation and one smaller, private firm. The Company's products also face
competition from aluminum, glass and plastic containers. In 1995, the Company
entered the plastic container line through the acquisition of Plastite. In 1996,
the Company expanded its plastics operations by acquiring the CPI Group.
Because shipping costs associated with the delivery of cans from outside
North America would add a major additional component of cost, the industry has
historically had relatively little competition from offshore manufacturers.
Management believes that this condition is unlikely to change in the foreseeable
future. Management also believes that, due to the substantial transportation
costs involved in shipping empty cans over long distances, its large number of
facilities and their strategic locations near customers are a major competitive
advantage.
Management believes that the following factors benefit the Company from a
competitive standpoint: (i) reputation for quality and service; (ii)
strategically located manufacturing facilities and a strong sales force; (iii)
substantial capital investment in new technology such as necked-in and barrier
package designs, high-speed presses and assembly equipment, and
computer-controlled lithography; (iv) quality control systems, including
statistical process control and electronic "vision" error detection; (v) breadth
of product line; (vi) in-house decorating and lithography capacity; and (vii) a
successful domestic labor strategy.
Custom and specialty products compete with a large number of container
manufacturers and closure suppliers; it does not compete across its entire
product spectrum with any single company. Competition is based principally on
price, quality and service, geographical proximity to customers and production
capability, with varying degrees of intensity according to the specific product
category. The Company believes it has the ability to compete favorably in each
aspect of the custom and specialty business as market conditions may require.
Metal services divides its business into metal decorating and tin mill
services. In metal decorating, metal services competes with a few smaller metal
decorating firms and the litho operations of the other major can companies. The
tin mill service center market is fragmented and shared by a large number of
firms. Management believes the Company's investment in litho capacity and
technology, reputation for quality, experience in metal decorating and
strategically located plants provide the Company with significant advantages
relative to its competitors.
12
<PAGE> 13
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company has 39 manufacturing facilities located in 12 states in the
U.S. and in five countries abroad, many of which are strategically positioned
near principal customers and suppliers. In Europe, USC Europe has production
locations in the five largest regional markets, including the United Kingdom,
France, Spain, Italy and Germany. The following table sets forth certain
information with respect to these plants as of February 28, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOCATION SIZE STATUS FUNCTION
-------- ---- ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
UNITED STATES
Elgin, IL............... 481,346 sq. ft. Owned Manufacture and assembly of a full range
of aerosol cans, round gallons and oblong
cans of all sizes.
Chicago, IL............. 266,269 sq. ft. Owned Steel slitting and shearing, coating and
lithography.
Tallapoosa, GA.......... 228,080 sq. ft. Owned Manufacture and assembly of a full range
of aerosol cans and round gallons.
Commerce, CA............ 215,860 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture and assembly of aerosol cans,
oblong cans and round quarts and gallons.
Sparrows Point, MD...... 211,670 sq. ft. Leased Steel shearing, coating and lithography.
Glen Dale, WV(1)........ 210,000 sq. ft. Owned Manufacture of metal caps and closures,
and custom and specialty products.
Burns Harbor, IN........ 190,000 sq. ft. Leased Steel shearing, coating and lithography.
Hubbard, OH............. 174,970 sq. ft. Owned Manufacture and assembly of a full range
of round and general line cans.
Baltimore, MD........... 150,000 sq. ft. Leased Assembly of round cans.
Horsham, PA............. 132,000 sq. ft. Owned Assembly of aerosol cans and manufacture
of ends.
Racine, WI.............. 130,000 sq. ft. Owned Assembly of aerosol cans.
Brookfield, OH.......... 129,900 sq. ft. Leased Steel slitting, shearing and processing.
Green Bay, WI........... 127,000 sq. ft. Leased Assembly of aerosol cans.
Baltimore, MD
(Steeltin Plant)...... 123,000 sq. ft. Owned Assembly of specialty cans.
Columbiana, OH.......... 121,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of custom and specialty
products.
Morrow, GA.............. 110,160 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of plastic containers.
Weirton, WV............. 108,000 sq. ft. Leased Steel shearing, coating and lithography.
North Brunswick, NJ..... 106,326 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture and assembly of steel pails.
Danville, IL(2)......... 100,000 sq. ft. Owned Assembly of aerosol cans and manufacture
of ends.
Wheeling, WV............ 100,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of metal caps and closures.
Trenton, NJ............. 98,700 sq. ft. Leased Steel shearing, coating and lithography.
Newnan, GA.............. 95,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of plastic pails and other
products.
Fern Park, FL........... 90,081 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture and overhaul of packaging
equipment and parts.
Alsip, IL
(Midwest Litho
Center)............... 90,000 sq. ft. Owned Steel shearing and coating.
Dallas, TX.............. 87,000 sq. ft. Owned Manufacture of round cans.
Vernalis, CA............ 74,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of custom and specialty
containers.
Alsip, IL............... 64,349 sq. ft. Leased Assembly of round flat-top and screw-neck
cans.
Warren, OH.............. 58,000 sq. ft. Leased Coating and lithography.
Alliance, OH............ 52,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of plastic products.
Baltimore, MD
(Columbia
Specialty)............ 45,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of specialty tins and
components.
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE> 14
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOCATION SIZE STATUS FUNCTION
-------- ---- ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Jerseyville, IL......... 24,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture of plastic products.
New Castle, PA.......... 22,750 sq. ft. Owned Coating and lithography.
Tallapoosa, GA.......... 21,400 sq. ft. Owned Sporri Development Center; assembly of a
variety of specialty cans, including
small-size aerosol cans.
EUROPE
Merthyr Tydfil, UK...... 320,000 sq. ft. Leased(3) Manufacture and assembly of aerosol cans.
Southall, UK............ 253,000 sq. ft. Owned Manufacture and assembly of aerosol cans.
Laon, France............ 220,000 sq. ft. Leased Manufacture and assembly of aerosol cans.
Reus, Spain............. 182,250 sq. ft. Owned Manufacture and assembly of aerosol cans.
Tredegar, UK............ 90,350 sq. ft. Owned Steel shearing and coating operations.
Voghera, Italy(4)....... 45,200 sq. ft. Leased Assembly of aerosol cans.
Schwedt, Germany........ 35,500 sq. ft. Leased Assembly of aerosol cans.
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Purchased July 31, 1996; expected date of manufacturing capability is
mid-1997.
(2) Subject to a mortgage in favor of The First National Bank of Danville.
(3) The property at Merthyr Tydfil is subject to a 999-year lease with a
pre-paid option to buy which becomes exercisable in January 2007. Up to that
time, the landowner may require the Company to purchase the property for a
payment of 1 pound British Sterling.
(4) Lease executed on December 18, 1996. The Company has taken occupancy of this
building and expects manufacturing to begin during the second quarter of
1997.
Currently, the Company's facility under construction at Merthyr Tydfil is
subject to a pledge of the leasehold interests and personal property located
thereon to secure amounts outstanding under a credit agreement entered into with
General Electric Capital Corporation on December 20, 1996. The Company's
facility in Laon, France is subject to a pledge of the leasehold interests
pursuant to a lease financing arrangement with Sogaibail, S.A.
In addition to its manufacturing facilities, the Company owns approximately
22 acres of undeveloped land in Raeford, North Carolina; leases 37,734 square
feet of office space in Oak Brook, Illinois to house its corporate headquarters;
leases approximately 102,400 square feet of office and warehouse space in
Baltimore, Maryland to house a custom and specialty sales office and
distribution center; and leases approximately 58,200 square feet of office and
warehouse space in Saddle Brook, New Jersey to house East Coast aerosol and
paint and general line sales and a general line distribution center. The Company
owns an additional building in Saddle Brook, where manufacturing operations were
formerly conducted, a 118,000 square-foot building in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, which is under contract for sale, a 145,000 square-foot building
in Baltimore, Maryland, where AMS conducted metal service operations, a 40,000
square-foot space in Benecia, California, which is available for sub-lease, and
a 68,000 square foot building in Trussville, Alabama, which is under contract
for sale.
Management believes the Company's facilities are adequate for its present
needs and that its properties are generally in good condition, well-maintained
and suitable for their intended use. All of the manufacturing plants described
in the table above (other than Glen Dale, WV and Voghera, Italy) are operating
in regular service with one or more shifts per day. The Company continuously
evaluates the composition of its various manufacturing facilities in light of
current and expected market conditions and demand. While no plans currently
exist to further consolidate plant operations, such actions may be deemed
appropriate in the future.
In July 1996, the Company completed its acquisition of a facility in Glen
Dale, West Virginia for the transfer of its manufacturing operations currently
located in Wheeling, West Virginia. In January 1997, the Company acquired
certain assets from O-I which include machinery, equipment, inventory and raw
materials of O-I's Erie, Pennsylvania metal business. O-I will operate these
lines for up to one year, pending relocation. The Company plans to transfer
manufacturing capabilities from O-I's Erie plant to Glen Dale.
14
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company is involved in a number of legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that these proceedings
will have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of
the Company either individually or in the aggregate. In addition, the Company is
involved in the following matters.
On February 28, 1995, Continental Holdings Inc. ("CHI"), an affiliate of
Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. ("Kiewit"), filed a Complaint against U.S. Can and
others in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, asserting
claims based upon alleged indemnity obligations of U.S. Can to Kiewit, as
successor in interest to CCC, arising from the 1987 acquisition by U.S. Can of
the general packaging business of CCC. These alleged indemnity obligations
relate to environmental liabilities, reimbursable insurance deductibles and
reinsurance amounts, and certain personal injury and employment discrimination
claims. The Complaint includes counts for breach of contract, declaratory
judgment, indemnification and contribution, certain statutory remedies, state
environmental law remedies and unjust enrichment. CHI seeks unspecified
compensatory damages, consequential and incidental damages, interest, attorneys'
fees and costs of litigation, equitable relief, environmental response costs,
and restitution. No aggregate dollar amount of damages is specified in the
Complaint. However, in an initial discovery disclosure served on U.S. Can, CHI
alleged that its damages to the date of such disclosure were approximately $4.4
million. U.S. Can has filed an Answer to the Complaint, asserted affirmative
defenses and made counterclaims against CHI seeking reimbursement for expenses
and accruals relating to postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for
former employees of CCC, and expenses incurred as a result of CCC's breach of
its contractual indemnification obligations to U.S. Can. The case has been
transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois. U.S. Can believes it has meritorious defenses to all of CHI's claims.
The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") has issued a decision finding
the Company in violation of certain sections of the National Labor Relations Act
as a result of the Company's closure of certain facilities in 1991 and failure
to offer inter-plant job opportunities to affected employees. Management does
not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
Aerosol containers, the Company's principal product, have historically been
subject to criticism on environmental grounds. While the Company believes that
aerosol can technology is environmentally sound, unfavorable legislation or
regulation relating to aerosols could reduce the number of aerosol containers
used by the Company's customers, which could have a material adverse effect on
the Company. The Company is also subject to potential liability for the costs of
environmental remediation. This liability may be based upon the ownership or
operation of industrial facilities where contaminants may be found, regardless
of whether the Company has contributed to the contamination.
The Company understands that the groundwater in San Leandro, California
(formerly a site of one of the Company's can assembly facilities) is
contaminated at shallow and intermediate depths, and that the area of concern
partially extends to the groundwater below its former can assembly facility. The
California Regional Water Quality Control Board originally examined
contamination issues involving the site but did not, in 1989-91, require any
remediation. The Company did expend approximately $375,000 in voluntary ground
remediation of a potential contamination site on this property at that time. The
California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("CDTSC") identified regional
groundwater contamination concerns for this area and has been trying to define
and delineate the areas of possible contamination and the sources of the
contamination on a regional basis. In late April 1996, the CDTSC issued to
certain of the past and present owners of this facility, including U.S. Can, an
order directing such owners to conduct remediation activities at this site;
however, no specific form of remediation was indicated. Representatives of the
Company met with the CDTSC in response to the order and agreed to undertake
additional site assessment work with the purpose of producing a site
characterization to determine with greater focus the nature of the
contamination. In January 1997, the Company received results from on-site
investigations conducted by an independent environmental consultant. Those
results indicated that, while no evidence of soil contamination in the studied
areas was found, there is a substantial probability that soil beneath one area
of the facility has had an impact
15
<PAGE> 16
on site groundwater. Additionally, groundwater in the vicinity has been impacted
by contaminants which appear to be migrating on-site from up gradient sources.
The Company's designated consultant has delivered to the CDTSC a work plan to
develop site characterization. The San Leandro facility was closed in 1989 and
was sold, except for a related parcel of land, in 1994. The remaining parcel was
sold in 1995. In connection with the sale, the Company agreed to indemnify the
purchaser against any environmental claims related to the Company's ownership of
the property. There can be no assurance that the Company will not incur material
costs and expenses in connection with the CDTSC order.
For a discussion of various Superfund sites in the U.S., see "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations --
Environmental Matters."
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the
solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of 1996.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND POLICY
U.S. Can Corporation's common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common
Stock"), has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since April 7, 1995,
trading under the symbol "USC." Prior to that time, the Common Stock was
included in the Nasdaq National Market under the trading symbol "USCN." The
table below sets forth the high and low bid information for the Common Stock for
the first quarter of 1995, and the high and low sales price for the Common Stock
for each full quarterly period thereafter.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTER HIGH LOW
------- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C>
First quarter, 1995........................................ $23.250 $18.750
Second quarter, 1995....................................... 21.500 14.000
Third quarter, 1995........................................ 16.000 12.000
Fourth quarter, 1995....................................... 14.250 11.000
First quarter, 1996........................................ 17.375 13.250
Second quarter, 1996....................................... 18.250 16.125
Third quarter, 1996........................................ 16.375 14.500
Fourth quarter, 1996....................................... 17.250 15.250
</TABLE>
The bid information for the first quarter of 1995 set forth above reflects
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may
not necessarily represent actual transactions.
As of February 28, 1997, there were 778 record holders of the Common Stock.
No cash dividends have been declared on the Common Stock by U.S. Can Corporation
during 1995 or 1996, and U.S. Can Corporation has no intention to pay cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. There are restrictions under U.S. Can's
credit agreements on the ability of U.S. Can to transfer funds to U.S. Can
Corporation in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances, and U.S. Can
Corporation's ability to pay dividends, that currently limit U.S. Can
Corporation's ability to pay cash dividends and are likely to limit the future
payment of dividends on the Common Stock.
SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
In March 1996, the Company contributed shares of Common Stock, valued at
approximately $425,000, to U.S. Can's Salaried Employees Savings and Retirement
Accumulation Plan ("SRAP"). This contribution served as partial payment of an
inter-company debt owed by U.S. Can Corporation to U.S. Can. These shares are
held by the trustee for the benefit of the SRAP participants, who have an
indirect beneficial interest in the Common Stock held by the trustee. The
transaction between the Company and the trustee is exempt pursuant
16
<PAGE> 17
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"). In June 1996, 62,000
shares of restricted Common Stock were awarded to officers of the Company and
U.S. Can, as compensation. These awards were exempt pursuant to Section 4(2) of
the Act.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected historical financial data has been derived from the
Company's consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction
with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, for
the years ended December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996, contained in Item 8 of this
Report, and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations," contained in Item 7 of this Report.
17
<PAGE> 18
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(000'S OMITTED, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA AND PERCENTAGES)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA:
Net Sales....................... $396,604 $455,127 $563,153 $626,485 $761,429
Cost of sales................... 346,193 392,652 481,676 555,478 669,772
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross income.................. 50,411 62,475 81,477 71,007 91,657
Selling, general and
administrative expenses....... 19,671 20,270 24,798 27,369 30,131
Overhead reduction
provision(a).................. -- -- -- 8,000 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income........... 30,740 42,205 56,679 35,638 61,526
Interest expense on
borrowings.................... 21,940 19,576 21,829 24,513 28,387
Amortization of deferred
financing costs............... 962 1,052 1,307 1,543 1,518
Consolidation expense(b)........ 887 622 463 327 --
Other expense................... 648 648 1,117 1,708 1,946
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes,
minority interest,
extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of
accounting change.......... 6,303 20,307 31,963 7,547 29,675
Provision for income taxes...... 3,056 8,775 13,393 3,608 12,674
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before minority
interest, extraordinary
item and cumulative effect
of accounting change....... 3,247 11,532 18,570 3,939 17,001
Minority interest(c)............ (2,825) (608) -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before extraordinary
item and cumulative effect
of accounting change....... 422 10,924 18,570 3,939 17,001
Extraordinary item--loss from
early extinguishment of debt,
net of income taxes........... -- (3,402) -- -- (5,250)
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of income
taxes(d)...................... (12,537) -- -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)............... $(12,115) $ 7,522 $ 18,570 $ 3,939 $ 11,751
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
PRIMARY PER SHARE DATA (E):
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of
accounting change............. $ (0.15) $ 1.16 $ 1.73 $ 0.31 $ 1.30
Extraordinary item.............. -- (0.37) -- -- (0.40)
Cumulative effect of accounting
change........................ (2.83) -- -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)............... $ (2.98) $ 0.79 $ 1.73 $ 0.31 $ 0.90
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted averages shares
outstanding (000's)........... 4,428 9,212 10,714 12,839 13,090
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
OTHER DATA:
Capital expenditures............ $ 17,185 $ 22,010 $ 32,516 $ 31,379 $ 48,630
Gross margin.................... 12.7% 13.7% 14.5% 11.3% 12.0%
Operating margin................ 7.8% 9.3% 10.1% 5.7% 8.1%
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE> 19
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(000'S OMITTED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Current assets............................ $ 84,609 $ 99,551 $134,279 $147,185 $232,564
Total assets.............................. 280,184 306,588 400,724 455,436 643,616
Current liabilities....................... 58,139 70,171 95,475 98,237 126,934
Total debt (including current
maturities)............................. 202,668 182,822 200,646 244,576 375,810
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)
(f)..................................... (44,000) 18,509 74,910 81,827 96,785
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) The Company recorded a pretax charge of approximately $8.0 million in the
fourth quarter of 1995 related to actions taken to reduce overhead and to
eliminate redundant manufacturing capacity. See Note 7 of the "Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements."
(b) Annual consolidation expense charges to income represent interest costs
related to the reserves established for plant closings and are based on
U.S. Can's incremental borrowing rate at the time the discounted reserves
were established.
(c) Minority interest represents participation of the former holder of U.S.
Can's Class 1 Preferred Stock, by virtue of its accretion right, in the
earnings of U.S. Can. All remaining shares of Class 1 Preferred Stock were
redeemed in connection with the Company's initial public equity offering in
March 1993.
(d) Effective January 1, 1992, the Company changed its method of accounting for
postretirement benefits, other than pension, and its method of accounting
for income taxes. The accounting change for such postretirement benefits
resulted in a net non-cash charge of $12.5 million and decreased operating
income in 1992 by $1.2 million. The accounting change for income taxes was
immaterial in amount.
(e) Primary net income (loss) per common share amounts are computed by dividing
net income applicable to common stock (computed as net income (loss) less
dividends earned during the period on the Company's preferred stock and
accretion on the Company's redeemable warrants, such stock and warrants
outstanding only through March 1993) by the weighted average common shares
and common equivalent shares outstanding during the periods. Such average
shares include common shares outstanding and common shares subject to
outstanding dilutive stock options and stock purchase warrants. All shares
issued in 1992 were treated as outstanding for all reported periods.
(f) The significant increases in stockholders' equity in 1993 and 1994 were
primarily due to the Company's initial public equity offering in March 1993
and the Company's equity offering in November 1994, which resulted in net
increases of $48.6 million and $34.2 million, respectively.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
In November 1994, the Company completed a second public offering of Common
Stock and contributed the net proceeds of $34.2 million to the capital of U.S.
Can. The net proceeds were used by U.S. Can to prepay a portion of the
outstanding balance of its revolving line of credit.
Since 1994, the Company has made a number of acquisitions. In 1994, the
Company acquired the stock of Steeltin and the assets of two affiliated
companies, Eastern Metal Decorating, Inc. ("EMD") and Eastern Container Company,
Inc. ("ECC") (Steeltin, EMD and ECC collectively referred to hereinafter as
"Steeltin"); assets from Midwest Can Company ("Midwest"); the stock of Ellisco;
the stock of Rollason Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc. ("Rollason"); the assets
of a lithography plant from Ball Corporation; and the metal packaging operations
of Grafco Industries Limited Partnership ("Grafco"). In 1995, the Company
acquired the stock of Plastite, Hunter Container Corporation ("Hunter") and
Metal Litho International and the assets of a related partnership ("MLI"), as
well as certain assets of Prospect Industries Corporation ("Prospect"). In April
1996, the Company acquired the assets of AMS. The stock of the CPI Group and the
stock and assets of USC Europe were acquired in August 1996 and September 1996,
respectively.
19
<PAGE> 20
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AS COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Net Sales
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 1996 totaled $761.4 million, an
increase of 21.5% over the corresponding period in 1995. Companies acquired by
U.S. Can during the first three quarters of 1996, including USC Europe, added
approximately $86.5 million to sales in 1996. The Company has also realized
additional sales as a result of the MLI, Plastite, Hunter and Prospect
acquisitions in 1995 and the AMS, CPI Group and USC Europe acquisitions in 1996.
Sales gains for the year also reflect volume growth in substantially all of the
Company's products.
Gross Income
Gross income of $91.7 million for 1996 was $20.7 million, or 29.1%, higher
than gross income for 1995. The 1996 acquisitions and higher margins on certain
products contributed to this increase. Volume gains in 1996 with stable costs
contributed to improved performance. Gross margin increased to 12.0% of net
sales in 1996 from 11.3% of net sales in 1995 despite a significant advance
purchase of steel in late 1994 which resulted in the Company not realizing the
full impact of the 1995 steel price increase in the first quarter of 1995. In
1995, margins, as well as sales, were negatively impacted by weak second half
demand. In 1996, the fourth quarter and full year were impacted by the somewhat
lower margins of acquired businesses and seasonality of the new European
operations. However, these were more than offset by improved sales and margins
in core operations. U.S. Can expects the integration of acquired operations will
improve overall margins. However, progress will be limited during the first half
of 1997 by the start-up of two plants in Europe, one in the U.S. and the
relocation of another domestic operation.
Operating Income
The Company's operating income of $61.5 million for 1996 was $25.9 million,
or 72.6%, higher than operating income for 1995. Income was favorably impacted
by increased sales, improved margins and the effect of an overhead reduction
program begun in late 1995. Operating income as a percent of net sales was 8.1%
for 1996 as compared to 5.7% for 1995. The Company experienced an increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses during 1996, primarily due to
acquisitions. However, these expenses as a percent of net sales decreased from
4.4% of net sales in 1995 to 4.0% of net sales in 1996. Increased
diversification into metal services, plastics and Europe is expected to
temporarily restrain operating margin growth until those new operations are
assimilated into the Company.
Interest and Other Expenses
Interest expense on borrowings increased by approximately $3.9 million in
1996 as compared to 1995. The increase is a result of increased borrowing,
primarily to finance the Company's acquisitions and the refinancing of shorter
term bank debt with a portion of the proceeds of the 10 1/8% $275 million note
issue in October 1996. Amortization of deferred financing costs and other
expense remained flat in 1996 as compared to 1995. The Company believes more
permanent long-term capital is the most appropriate means to finance
acquisitions, and, due to strong demand, it was able to borrow $50 million more
than originally planned in the Note offering. As a result, repayment of lower
cost, shorter term debt with the Note proceeds will continue to generate
somewhat higher interest expense even though a portion of the proceeds was used
to redeem higher cost 13.5% bonds.
Net Income
For 1996, income before extraordinary item was $17 million, more than four
times the $3.9 million reported in 1995. During 1996, the Company redeemed its
13 1/2% Notes with the proceeds from the issuance of the 10 1/8% Notes. The
early extinguishment of the 13 1/2% Notes resulted in an extraordinary charge of
$5.2 million (net of income taxes of $3.5 million) primarily representing a
prepayment premium and the write off of related unamortized deferred financing
costs. See Note (5) to the Consolidated Financial Statements
20
<PAGE> 21
included in Item 8 of this Report. Earnings per share before extraordinary item
were $1.30 for the year. After the extraordinary item, the Company had net
income of $11.8 million ($0.90 per share) in 1996 compared to net income of $3.9
million ($0.31 per share) in 1995.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, AS COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994
Net Sales
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 1995, totaled $626.5 million, an
increase of 11.2% over net sales in 1994. The 1994 acquisition of Ellisco and
acquisitions completed in 1995 were the primary factors contributing to the
sales growth. Increased volume in metal services also contributed to the sales
growth. 1995 sales of aerosol containers were down slightly, while sales of
round and general line containers increased slightly, compared to 1994. The
Company believes the weak demand in its core product lines was due to summer
weather conditions unfavorable for outdoor activities and painting and due to
inventory adjustments by major retailers which use the Company's products. The
Company experienced some increased demand in aerosol and round paint containers
in the fourth quarter of 1995 but demand did not return fully to more
traditional levels until December.
Gross Income
Gross income for 1995 was $71.0 million, 12.9% lower than gross income in
1994. Weak second half demand for aerosol, round and general line containers
resulted in underutilization of manufacturing capacity. This underutilization
and lower than anticipated income contributions from certain 1995 acquisitions
contributed to the decrease in gross income. Competitive pressures in the face
of weak demand precluded the Company from fully recovering cost increases with
corresponding increases in selling prices. Gross margin decreased from 14.5% of
net sales in 1994 to 11.3% of net sales in 1995.
Operating Income
During the fourth quarter of 1995, the Company recorded an $8.0 million
pretax charge for a plant consolidation and overhead reduction program. The
primary components of the charge include costs associated with severance
packages and the cessation of manufacturing at the Saddle Brook, New Jersey
facility. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $2.6 million
in 1995, as compared to 1994, due to acquisitions and the costs associated with
the terminated Massilly, S.A. investment. This provision, the increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses and the factors described above
resulted in operating income of $35.6 million for 1995, compared to $56.7
million in 1994. Operating income before the overhead reduction provision was
$43.6 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of
net sales, were 4.4% for both 1995 and 1994.
Interest and Other Expenses
Interest expense on borrowings increased by $2.7 million in 1995, as
compared to 1994. The increase is a result of increased borrowing primarily to
finance the Ellisco acquisition in 1994 and the MLI, Plastite, Prospect and
Hunter acquisitions in 1995, net of the effect of using the net proceeds from
the Company's public offering of Common Stock in 1994 to reduce debt.
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other expense also increased in
1995. The increase was primarily a result of new borrowings and goodwill
amortization related to acquisitions.
Net Income
As a result of the factors discussed above, the Company recorded net income
of $3.9 million ($0.31 per share) in 1995, compared to $18.6 million ($1.73 per
share) in 1994. Net income was adversely affected by $4.8 million ($0.38 per
share) as a result of the overhead reduction provision.
21
<PAGE> 22
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During the last three fiscal years, the Company has met its liquidity needs
primarily through internally generated cash flows, borrowings under its credit
lines and proceeds of securities offerings. Principal liquidity needs have
included operations, repayment of indebtedness and related interest, capital
expenditures and acquisitions. The Company completed the sale of the Notes in
October 1996, in order to refinance the 13 1/2% Notes with lower interest debt,
to retire the temporary acquisition financing incurred in 1996, including the
USC Europe Acquisition, and, generally, to replace shorter term, variable-rate
bank financing with longer term, fixed-rate financing.
From 1992 to 1994, the Company improved its cash flow from operations
through increased unit volumes, improved operating efficiencies, control of
selling, general and administrative costs and careful management of inventory
and receivables. Cash flow in 1995 was negatively impacted by higher material
costs, competitive pricing, weak demand in major markets and retail inventory
adjustments. Cash flow in 1996 returned to more historic levels. The Company
actively manages its working capital as both inventories and receivables
increase due to increased sales. The USC Europe Acquisition will have an adverse
impact on consolidated inventory turns and receivable days outstanding due to
business practices in Europe.
In April 1994, U.S. Can entered into the Credit Agreement providing a $130
million line of credit, consisting of a $95 million revolving credit facility
(the "Revolving Credit Facility") and a $35 million term loan (the "Term Loan").
Funds available under the Credit Agreement have been and may be used for working
capital and other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.
Obligations under the Credit Agreement are currently secured by U.S. Can's
inventories and accounts receivable. In December 1996, the Term Loan was repaid
in full, primarily with a borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility. This
repayment increased borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and reduced
the fee payable under the Credit Agreement for unused credit availability.
In early April 1996, the lenders under the Credit Agreement (the "Lenders")
provided a temporary $10 million increase in the Revolving Credit Facility due
to seasonal inventory requirements. In late April 1996, the Lenders provided an
additional temporary $20 million increase in the Revolving Credit Facility to
fund the AMS acquisition. In July 1996, the Lenders provided the Company with an
additional credit facility (the "Acquisition Facility") to fund certain
permitted acquisitions, including the USC Europe and CPI Group acquisitions. All
of the supplemental credit lines, including the Acquisition Facility, were
terminated on October 17, 1996, the closing date of the Note offering described
in the following paragraph.
On October 17, 1996, U.S. Can Corporation issued $275 million of Notes in a
private placement. Of the $268.1 million net proceeds to the Company from the
issuance, (I) approximately $109.7 million was deposited in an escrow account
and used to redeem U.S. Can's 13 1/2% Notes on January 15, 1997, and pay the
remaining interest thereon; (ii) approximately $67.3 million of the net proceeds
was used to retire the Acquisition Facility; and (iii) approximately $91.1
million of the net proceeds was used to repay a portion of the borrowings
outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. In March 1997, the Company
completed a registered exchange of the private Notes for freely transferable
Exchange Notes (the "Exchange Offer"). All of the Notes were tendered in the
Exchange Offer and, as a result, only the Exchange Notes remain outstanding.
Management believes that, through the Note offering and the Exchange Offer, the
Company has improved its capital structure and, as a result, the Company will be
able to commit greater resources to its capital programs, thereby improving its
cash flow.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company's total debt was approximately $375.8
million and scheduled principal payments (excluding principal due on the
Revolving Credit Facility) were approximately $11.9 million, $11.3 million, $8.6
million, $3.8 million and $4.9 million for the years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and
2001, respectively. All amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility
are required to be repaid in April 1998. As of February 28, 1997, U.S. Can had
borrowings of $51.5 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement, $11.8
million in letters of credit had been issued pursuant thereto and $31.7 million
of unused credit remained available thereunder. As of December 31, 1996, U.S.
Can was in compliance with the Credit Agreement and its other long-term debt
agreements.
22
<PAGE> 23
Cash flow from operations for the year ended December 31, 1996, as adjusted
for interest payments of $28.4 million during that period, was approximately
$59.3 million. Principal and interest requirements (net of related income tax
benefits and excluding such amounts due under the Revolving Credit Facility) are
expected to be approximately $39.2 million in 1997, $43.7 million in 1998, $25.6
million in 1999 and $20.5 million in 2000. Using cash flow from operations for
the year ended December 31, 1996 (as adjusted for interest payments during that
period) as a benchmark, assuming no increase or decrease in that cash flow from
operations, the Company's cash flow from operations at the level generated
during this period would exceed principal and interest (net of income taxes)
requirements (excluding for the Revolving Credit Facility) for the years 1997
through 2000.
The Company's capital expenditures totaled $48.6 million in 1996, $31.4
million in 1995 and $32.5 million in 1994. In each case, these capital
expenditures included investments in new can production lines, paint can line
enhancements, advanced lithography technology and computer integrated
manufacturing, to increase manufacturing capacity, reduce changeover times and
improve productivity. The Company has also invested capital in plant expansions
and the installation of state-of-the-art end-making presses and automated
packaging equipment.
The Company expects to spend approximately $300 million on capital
expenditures during the five years commencing in 1997, in roughly equal annual
amounts. The Company makes capital expenditures principally for improvements in
the productivity and quality of lithography operations, continued technological
enhancement of existing equipment, automation of existing processes,
computer-integrated manufacturing techniques, quality and service improvements,
facility expansion, and, if necessary to meet demand, additional can-making
capacity. For the new Merthyr Tydfil facility, the Company has undertaken an
investment of approximately $28.5 million over a two- to three-year period, in
order to establish a state-of-the-art aerosol can manufacturing plant. The
Company's capital investments have historically yielded reduced operating costs
and improved the Company's profit margins, and management believes that the
strategic deployment of capital will enable the Company to improve its overall
profitability by leveraging the economies of scale inherent in the manufacture
of containers.
Management believes that cash flow from operations, amounts available under
its credit facilities and proceeds from equipment financings should provide
sufficient funds for the Company's short-term and long-term capital expenditure
and debt amortization requirements, and other cash needs in the ordinary course
of business. The Company believes it will be able to refinance the Revolving
Credit Facility on or prior to maturity. If future strategic acquisition
opportunities arise, the Company would expect to finance them though some
combination of cash, stock and/or debt financing.
ACQUISITIONS
In January 1994, U.S. Can acquired the stock of Steeltin and assets of two
related companies. Steeltin was subsequently merged into U.S. Can. The total
cost of this transaction was approximately $19.1 million in cash, plus the
assumption of approximately $1.6 million of debt. In March 1994, U.S. Can
acquired the stock of Ellisco from CSS Industries, Inc. and certain minority
shareholders for approximately $32.2 million. Ellisco was subsequently merged
into U.S. Can.
In the first quarter of 1995, U.S. Can acquired the stock of MLI and
Plastite for an aggregate amount of approximately $17.4 million in cash, plus
the assumption of debt and certain future contingent payments. Both MLI and
Plastite were subsequently merged into U.S. Can. In April 1995, U.S. Can
acquired certain assets from Prospect for approximately $8.8 million and, in May
1995, U.S. Can acquired the stock of Hunter for approximately $4.0 million, plus
the assumption of certain debt. Hunter was subsequently merged into U.S. Can.
In April 1996, U.S. Can completed the acquisition of assets of AMS from
Alltrista for a purchase price of approximately $14.9 million. Subsequent to the
purchase of the AMS assets, U.S. Can negotiated for the purchase of additional
assets, including inventory and raw materials from Alltrista. In June 1996, U.S.
Can purchased such additional assets from AMS for a total of approximately $8
million on an installment basis,
23
<PAGE> 24
with the final payment of $2.2 million being paid on October 25, 1996, using
borrowings made by U.S. Can under the Revolving Credit Facility.
In August 1996, U.S. Can completed the acquisition of all of the
outstanding stock of the CPI Group for approximately $15.1 million and potential
contingent payments not to exceed $1 million. Potential contingent payments are
equal to 50% of the amount, if any, by which an amount representing adjusted
gross profit of the CPI Group in 1996 and 1997 exceeds such amount for the year
1995. Subsequent to the acquisition, the CPI Group companies were merged into
U.S. Can.
The Company completed the USC Europe Acquisition on September 11, 1996. USC
Europe has aerosol can businesses located in the United Kingdom, France, Spain
and Germany, as well as certain aerosol can-making equipment in Italy. The
purchase price included $52.8 million in cash and the assumption of net
indebtedness totaling $5.8 million, subject to a post-closing adjustment for
changes in working capital between April 30, 1996 and the closing of the USC
Europe Acquisition on September 11, 1996. This adjustment is expected to equal
at least $1.7 million, reducing the net cash paid by the Company for USC Europe
to approximately $51.1 million.
While the Company has historically aggressively sought acquisitions to
implement its growth strategies, these objectives have largely been met with the
completion of the 1996 acquisitions. However, the Company will continue to
evaluate and selectively pursue acquisitions which it believes are strategically
important to meeting its customers needs, attracting new customers, adding new
products, complementing its existing business and expanding its geographic
reach.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company's domestic and foreign operations are subject to extensive
governmental regulatory requirements relating to environmental protection. As
part of its compliance effort, management has commissioned outside technical
consultants to work in concert with the Company's internal environmental group
to implement a company-wide environmental auditing program. Based on the 1996
audit results and reports prepared in connection with the 1996 acquisitions,
management believes that the Company's current operations are in substantial
compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, the violation of
which would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is in the
process of integrating USC Europe into its environmental management system and
will be evaluating USC Europe's ongoing compliance responsibilities during this
process. There can be no assurance that currently unknown matters, new laws and
regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws and regulations will
not materially affect the Company's business or results of operations in the
future.
As part of its commitment to capital investment in technology, the Company
has made, and expects to continue to make, significant capital expenditures to
upgrade its facilities in accordance with current and pending environmental
regulations. Approximately 8.9% of the Company's capital budget is
environmentally related. A program dedicating approximately $8.3 million to
upgrade the Company's lithography centers to comply with scheduled Clean Air Act
requirements has been undertaken, of which $6.2 million had been spent as of
December 31, 1996. With respect to USC Europe, a thermal oxidizer has been
ordered and will be installed at the Southall facility in England, at an
estimated cost of approximately $800,000, to comply with U.K. air emissions
regulations.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company's reserves for future ascertainable
costs of environmental remediation in the United States were approximately
$400,000. Management does not believe that such costs, if any, in excess of the
reserve will have a material adverse affect on the Company's results of
operations or financial condition. In making this assessment, the Company
considered all information available to it including its and other companies'
reported prior experience in dealing with such matters, data released by the EPA
and reports by independent environmental consultants regarding certain matters.
In estimating the ascertainable costs of environmental remediation, management
has not taken into account any potential insurance recovery. In conjunction with
its acquisitions, the Company routinely obtains indemnification for
environmental matters from the sellers. Such indemnification is typically
subject to varying "baskets" or deductibles and maximum limitations, and is
ultimately subject to the creditworthiness of the indemnitor(s) (and in some
cases the guarantor of the indemnity obligations).
24
<PAGE> 25
With respect to the USC Europe facilities, no subsurface sampling has been
performed to identify possible contamination. Several of the facilities have
been operating at their locations for more than ten years and, according to a
survey conducted by an independent environmental consultant, it is likely that
there have been releases of hazardous substances at these locations in the past.
However, management has been advised by an independent environmental consultant,
familiar with United Kingdom and German law and policy with respect to
remediation requirements, that the local authorities are unlikely to propose or
enforce stringent remediation requirements which would affect the commercial
viability of either the German or the British facilities given their location in
heavily industrialized areas. Moreover, the Company has been indemnified by
Crown as to environmental conditions at these sites. Management believes that
any future requirement to remediate these sites will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
The Company received a request for information from the U.S. EPA in January
1997, concerning the lithography operations at its Chicago facility (formerly
owned by Alltrista). In March 1997, representatives of the U.S. EPA inspected
the Chicago facility and requested additional information, including compliance
tests and reports. The Company is cooperating fully with the U.S. EPA inquiry.
The Company does not know what the outcome of this inquiry will be. In the
acquisition agreement between the Company and Alltrista, Alltrista agreed to
indemnify the Company for compliance costs that relate back to Alltrista's
operation of this facility.
For a discussion of the San Leandro, California environmental order, see
"Legal Proceedings and Regulatory Matters." There can be no assurance that the
Company will not incur material costs and expenses in connection with this
order.
In connection with a 1993 asset purchase, the Company entered into an
Administrative Consent Order ("ACO") with the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection ("NJDEP"), requiring U.S. Can to investigate and
remediate certain environmental concerns at the Saddle Brook, New Jersey
facility. As part of the ACO, U.S. Can deposited $3 million into an escrow
account, which U.S. Can may draw from to fund such activities. The ACO limits
U.S. Can's liability under New Jersey environmental laws in this respect to the
$3 million deposited in the escrow account. This limitation does not, however,
limit U.S. Can's liability for clean-up costs resulting from its own activities
in the event of a sale, or other transfer of control, of U.S. Can or the
facility. The Company is working with the NJDEP to complete the remediation
process. The Company does not believe the costs of remediation and monitoring
will exceed the escrow amount.
As a potentially responsible party ("PRP") at various Superfund sites in
the U.S., the Company is or may be legally responsible, jointly and severally
with the other members of the PRP group, for the cost of remediation of these
sites. Based on currently available data (including EPA data, internal records
and other sources believed to be reliable), the Company believes its
contribution, and/or the contribution of its predecessors, to these sites was de
minimis. Based on the information available as of the date of this Report,
management does not believe that its aggregate remediation costs or potential
liabilities in connection with these sites will have a material adverse effect
on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. However, there
can be no assurance that the other PRP's will pay their proportionate share of
the remediation costs at these sites and, as a result, future costs or
liabilities incurred by the Company could be material.
With respect to each of the matters discussed above, there can be no
assurance that the Company will not be required to pay environmental compliance
costs or to incur liabilities that may be material in amount. Based on
information available as of the date of this Report, management does not believe
that aggregate remediation costs or other liability in connection with the
possible contamination at these sites would have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition or results of operations. Further, although at
this time there are no environmental compliance costs which the Company believes
to be material there can be no assurance that the Company will not be required
to pay environmental compliance costs or to incur liabilities that may be
material in amount due to matters which arise in the future or matters which are
not known to the Company as of the date of this Report.
LITIGATION
For a discussion of the Kiewit litigation, see "Legal Proceedings and
Regulatory Matters." For a discussion of the San Leandro, California remediation
order, the U.S. EPA inquiry at the Chicago plant and Superfund sites affecting
the Company, see "-- Environmental Matters." The Company is involved in various
25
<PAGE> 26
other environmental and legal actions and administrative proceedings. Management
is of the opinion that the outcome of such other actions and proceedings will
not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.
SEASONALITY
The Company's business as a whole is not affected to any significant degree
by seasonal variations, although quarterly sales and earnings tend to be
slightly stronger starting in early spring (second quarter) and extending
through late summer (third quarter). Aerosol sales do not tend to fluctuate
during the year, with only relatively minor spring and summer increases related
to household products and insect repellents. Paint sales tend to be stronger in
spring and early summer due to the favorable weather conditions. Portions of the
custom and specialty products line tend to vary seasonally, because of holiday
sales late in the year.
INTEREST RATES / FOREIGN CURRENCY
Management does not believe that interest rate fluctuations have a material
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition. As of
December 31, 1996, 12.7% of the Company's borrowings were floating rate
obligations. In the past, management has adopted strategies to increase the
Company's floating-rate exposure to benefit from declining rates. Currently, the
Company holds no interest rate swaps. However, in an effort to limit foreign
exchange risk related to the financing of the Merthyr Tydfil facility, the
Company has entered into a series of British Pound / Dollar forward contracts
that will not exceed $37 million in notional amount or a term of more than seven
years. The Indenture under which the 10 1/8 Notes were issued limits the
Company's ability to enter into currency hedging transactions that would be
considered speculative, such as transactions unrelated to repayment of
indebtedness permitted by the Indenture.
INFLATION
Historically, the Company has not always been able to immediately offset
increases in tin plate prices with price increases on the Company's products.
However, in most years, a combination of factors has permitted the Company to
improve its profitability notwithstanding these conditions. The Company's
capital spending programs and manufacturing process upgrades have increased
operating efficiencies and thereby reduced the Company's unit cost of
production. In addition, historically, the Company has been able to negotiate
lower price increases than those announced by its major suppliers. See "Business
- -- Raw Materials." The operating efficiencies and reduced unit cost of
production which have been achieved through the Company's capital spending
programs have mitigated the impact of inflation on the Company's cost structure.
In 1995, higher material costs were one of the factors contributing to the
Company's reported earnings. Management does not believe inflation will have a
material adverse impact on the Company in the next several quarters.
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS/AEROSOL CONTAINERS
Aerosol containers accounted for 45.6% of the Company's gross sales for the
year ended December 31, 1996. A significant reduction in the number of aerosol
containers used by the Company's customers could have a material adverse effect
on the Company and, in particular, its European operations which are comprised
solely of aerosol manufacturing facilities.
The Company's manufacturing facility in Merthyr Tydfil is expected to be
operational in mid-1997. The initial investment of approximately $28.5 million,
being expended over the next two to three years, was commenced on the strength
of a commitment from Gillette for a long-term purchase arrangement in the U.K.
The loss of Gillette as a customer or a material reduction in the benefits to
the Company expected under this arrangement would have an adverse impact on the
profitability of that facility and the Company's ability to recoup the start-up
costs of establishing the facility.
The Company's relationships with its customers are critical to its
business. A significant portion of the Company's annual net sales is
attributable to repeat customers. The loss of a significant number of such
customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
26
<PAGE> 27
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................... 28
U.S. Can Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 1995 and 1996................... 29
U.S. Can Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
1994, 1995 and 1996....................................... 30
U.S. Can Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996.......................... 31
U.S. Can Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
1994, 1995 and 1996....................................... 32
U.S. Can Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements...................................... 33
U.S. Can Corporation and Subsidiaries Quarterly Financial
Data (Unaudited).......................................... 55
</TABLE>
27
<PAGE> 28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To U.S. Can Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of U.S. CAN
CORPORATION (a Delaware corporation) AND SUBSIDIARIES as of December 31, 1995
and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of U.S. Can
Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and their results
of operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 14, 1997
28
<PAGE> 29
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(000'S OMITTED, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1995 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 136 $ 7,966
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $5,451 and $10,895
in 1995 and 1996, respectively.......................... 51,279 86,822
Inventories............................................... 78,252 113,143
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................. 10,786 15,261
Prepaid income taxes...................................... 6,732 9,372
--------- ---------
Total current assets.................................. $ 147,185 $ 232,564
--------- ---------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Land...................................................... $ 2,576 $ 5,425
Buildings................................................. 44,954 62,421
Machinery, equipment and construction in process.......... 306,319 408,428
--------- ---------
$ 353,849 $ 476,274
Less -- Accumulated depreciation and amortization......... (123,748) (153,160)
--------- ---------
Total property, plant and equipment................... $ 230,101 $ 323,114
--------- ---------
MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS...................................... $ 5,395 $ 6,057
INTANGIBLES................................................. 62,301 67,206
OTHER ASSETS................................................ 10,454 14,675
--------- ---------
Total assets.......................................... $ 455,436 $ 643,616
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... $ 17,216 $ 11,928
Cash overdrafts........................................... 5,395 3,769
Accounts payable.......................................... 32,560 56,355
Accrued payrolls and benefits............................. 19,282 25,786
Accrued insurance......................................... 5,830 6,770
Other current liabilities................................. 17,954 22,326
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities............................. $ 98,237 $ 126,934
--------- ---------
SENIOR DEBT................................................. $ 127,360 $ 88,882
SUBORDINATED DEBT........................................... 100,000 275,000
--------- ---------
Total long-term debt.................................. $ 227,360 $ 363,882
--------- ---------
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Postretirement benefits................................... $ 25,080 $ 26,128
Deferred income taxes..................................... 19,962 27,892
Other long-term liabilities............................... 2,970 1,995
--------- ---------
Total other long-term liabilities..................... $ 48,012 $ 56,015
--------- ---------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding.................. $ -- $ --
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized
12,902,111 and 12,995,636 shares issued in 1995 and
1996, respectively...................................... 129 130
Paid-in capital........................................... 103,913 105,582
Unearned restricted stock................................. (2,052) (2,581)
Treasury common stock, at cost; 37,908 and 20,651 shares
in 1995 and 1996, respectively.......................... (319) (256)
Currency translation adjustment........................... -- 1,622
Retained deficit.......................................... (19,844) (7,712)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity............................ $ 81,827 $ 96,785
--------- ---------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity......... $ 455,436 $ 643,616
========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these balance sheets.
29
<PAGE> 30
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(000'S OMITTED, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES................................................... $563,153 $626,485 $761,429
COST OF SALES............................................... 481,676 555,478 669,772
-------- -------- --------
Gross income.............................................. $ 81,477 $ 71,007 $ 91,657
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES................ 24,798 27,369 30,131
OVERHEAD REDUCTION PROVISION................................ -- 8,000 --
-------- -------- --------
Operating income.......................................... $ 56,679 $ 35,638 $ 61,526
INTEREST EXPENSE ON BORROWINGS.............................. 21,829 24,513 28,387
AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS.................... 1,307 1,543 1,518
CONSOLIDATION EXPENSE....................................... 463 327 --
OTHER EXPENSE............................................... 1,117 1,708 1,946
-------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes and extraordinary item......... $ 31,963 $ 7,547 $ 29,675
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES.................................. 13,393 3,608 12,674
-------- -------- --------
Income before extraordinary item.......................... $ 18,570 $ 3,939 $ 17,001
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM -- LOSS FROM EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF
DEBT, net of income taxes................................. -- -- (5,250)
-------- -------- --------
NET INCOME.................................................. $ 18,570 $ 3,939 $ 11,751
======== ======== ========
PER SHARE DATA:
Income before extraordinary item.......................... $ 1.73 $ 0.31 $ 1.30
Extraordinary item........................................ -- -- (0.40)
-------- -------- --------
Net income............................................. $ 1.73 $ 0.31 $ 0.90
======== ======== ========
Weighted average shares and equivalent shares
outstanding (000's).................................. 10,714 12,839 13,090
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these statements.
30
<PAGE> 31
U. S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATION STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
(000'S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNEARNED TREASURY CUMULATIVE RETAINED
COMMON PAID-IN RESTRICTED COMMON TRANSLATION EARNINGS
STOCK CAPITAL STOCK STOCK ADJUSTMENT (DEFICIT)
------ ------- ---------- -------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1993.......... $101 $ 61,298 $ -- $(600) $ -- $(42,290)
Net income.......................... -- -- -- -- -- 18,570
Issuance of common stock............ 23 34,753 -- -- -- --
Payments of common stock issuance
costs............................ -- (579) -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock purchase plan..... 1 1,368 -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock in
connection with acquisition of
Rollason......................... 1 1,061 -- -- -- --
Purchase of treasury stock.......... -- -- -- (151) -- --
Issuance of treasury stock.......... -- 568 -- 283 -- --
Exercise of stock options........... -- 39 -- -- -- --
Income tax benefit related to
exercise of non qualified stock
options.......................... -- 291 -- -- -- --
Equity adjustment to reflect minimum
pension liability................ -- -- -- -- -- 173
---- -------- ------- ----- ------ --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994.......... $126 $ 98,799 $ -- $(468) $ -- $(23,547)
Net income.......................... -- -- -- -- -- 3,939
Payments of common stock issuance
costs............................ -- (22) -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock purchase plan..... 1 1,488 -- -- -- --
Purchase of treasury stock.......... -- -- -- (209) -- --
Issuance of treasury stock.......... -- 704 -- 358 -- --
Exercise of stock options........... 1 123 -- -- -- --
Income tax benefit related to
exercise of nonqualified stock
options.......................... -- 661 -- -- -- --
Issuance of restricted stock........ 1 2,160 (2,161) -- -- --
Amortization of unearned restricted
stock............................ -- -- 109 -- -- --
Equity adjustment to reflect minimum
pension liability................ -- -- -- -- -- (236)
---- -------- ------- ----- ------ --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995.......... $129 $103,913 $(2,052) $(319) $ -- $(19,844)
Net income.......................... -- -- -- -- -- 11,751
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock purchase plan..... -- 516 -- -- -- --
Purchase of treasury stock.......... -- -- -- (233) -- --
Issuance of treasury stock.......... -- 129 -- 296 -- --
Exercise of stock options........... -- 18 -- -- -- --
Issuance of restricted stock........ 1 1,006 (1,007) -- -- --
Amortization of unearned restricted
stock............................ -- -- 478 -- -- --
Equity adjustment to reflect minimum
pension liability................ -- -- -- -- -- 381
Cumulative translation adjustment... -- -- -- -- 1,622 --
---- -------- ------- ----- ------ --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996.......... $130 $105,582 $(2,581) $(256) $1,622 $ (7,712)
==== ======== ======= ===== ====== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these statements.
31
<PAGE> 32
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(000'S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income................................................ $ 18,570 $ 3,939 $ 11,751
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities --
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 22,670 28,238 33,977
Overhead reduction provision........................... -- 8,000 --
Plant consolidation costs paid......................... (2,793) (2,084) (8,582)
Consolidation expense.................................. 463 327 --
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt........... -- -- 5,250
Deferred income taxes.................................. 3,592 (567) 4,257
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect
of acquired businesses --
Accounts receivable.................................... (3,850) (1,373) (7,948)
Inventories............................................ (12,475) 4,716 (15,942)
Accounts payable....................................... 15,020 (15,832) 6,077
Accrued payrolls and benefits, insurance and other..... 2,078 (1,957) 2,805
Postretirement benefits................................ 1,222 545 599
Other, net............................................. (197) 840 (1,322)
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities............ $ 44,300 $ 24,792 $ 30,922
-------- -------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures...................................... $(32,516) $(31,379) $ (48,630)
Asset purchases........................................... (6,600) -- --
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired........... (51,647) (29,941) (80,894)
Change in restricted cash................................. -- (3,500) 1,455
Proceeds from sale of property............................ 1,838 600 1,515
Machinery repair parts usage, net......................... 437 63 (662)
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities................ $(88,488) $(64,157) $(127,216)
-------- -------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock and exercise of stock options.... $ 34,815 $ 124 $ 18
Net borrowings under the revolving line of credit and
changes in cash overdrafts............................. (22,375) 46,884 (25,052)
Borrowings under term loan................................ 35,000 -- --
Issuance of 10 1/8% Notes................................. -- -- 275,000
Amounts paid in escrow.................................... -- -- (109,728)
Borrowings of other long-term debt, including capital
lease obligations...................................... 10,080 10,911 14,247
Payments of other long-term debt, including capital lease
obligations............................................ (11,200) (17,973) (41,424)
Payments of debt refinancing costs........................ (1,307) (337) (9,259)
Payments of common stock issuance costs................... (579) (22) --
Purchase of treasury stock, net........................... (151) (209) (233)
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities............ $ 44,283 $ 39,378 $ 103,569
-------- -------- ---------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH..................... $ -- $ -- $ 555
-------- -------- ---------
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS....................... $ 95 $ 13 $ 7,830
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year................ 28 123 136
-------- -------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year...................... $ 123 $ 136 $ 7,966
======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these statements.
32
<PAGE> 33
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND OPERATIONS
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of U.S. Can
Corporation (the "Corporation"), its wholly owned subsidiary, United States Can
Company ("U.S. Can") and U.S. Can's subsidiaries, all of which are European
companies formed or acquired during 1996 (the "European Subsidiaries"). All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The
consolidated group is hereinafter referred to as the Company.
The Company is a manufacturer of steel and plastic containers for personal
care products and household, automotive, paint and industrial supplies. The
Company manufactures a broad line of aerosol containers for consumer and
household products in the United States and Europe. In its paint and general
line, the Company produces metal and plastic, round and oblong containers, pails
and drums for paints, coatings and industrial products in the United States. The
Company provides metal services including secondary steel, shearing, slitting,
coating and lithography of tin mill products for the container industry and
others and manufactures a wide variety of custom and specialty tins, decorative
containers and products. The Company owns or leases 33 plants, located in 12
states, and 7 plants located in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain and
Italy, many of which are positioned near principal customers and suppliers.
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Cash and Cash Equivalents -- The Company considers all liquid
interest-bearing instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents.
(b) Cash Overdrafts -- Cash overdrafts represent the aggregate amount of
checks which have been issued and have not yet cleared the Company's
zero-balance disbursement accounts, net of any cash in specific Company
depository accounts which will be automatically drawn against as such checks
clear the disbursement accounts. Cash on-hand and cash in Company accounts at
banks not subject to the automatic netting are reported as cash and cash
equivalents.
(c) Accounts Receivable Allowances -- Activity in the accounts receivable
allowances accounts was as follows (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year................................ $ 4,209 $ 4,116 $ 5,451
Provision for doubtful accounts........................... 477 220 459
Reserve for doubtful accounts from business
acquisitions........................................... 582 160 2,636
Provision for discounts, allowances and rebates........... 8,226 7,911 10,551
Write-offs of doubtful accounts, net of recoveries........ (832) (242) (546)
Discounts, allowances and rebates taken................... (8,546) (6,714) (7,656)
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year...................................... $ 4,116 $ 5,451 $10,895
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
(d) Inventories -- All domestic inventories, except machine parts, are
stated at cost determined by the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") cost method, not in
excess of market. Inventories of approximately $15.0 million at the European
Subsidiaries and machine shop inventory are stated at cost determined by the
first-in, first-out ("FIFO") cost method, not in excess of market. Inventory
costs include material, labor and factory overhead. FIFO cost of LIFO
inventories approximated their LIFO value at December 31, 1995 and 1996.
Tin-plated steel accounted for approximately 85% of the Company's total raw
material purchases during 1996. Negotiations with the Company's domestic
tin-plated steel suppliers occur once per year. At that time, the prices for
tin-plated steel are set for the upcoming year. Due to competition among steel
suppliers and the
33
<PAGE> 34
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
volume of tin-plated steel purchased by the Company in the United States, the
Company has historically negotiated raw materials pricing which are more
favorable than those publicly announced by its suppliers. However no assurance
can be given that the Company will continue to be able to do so in the future.
With respect to the European Subsidiaries, the Company has only limited prior
purchasing history with its tin plate suppliers. No assurance can be given that
the European Subsidiaries will be able to continue to purchase its tin plate
requirements from such existing sources at prices below those publicly announced
by its suppliers.
Inventories reported in the accompanying balance sheets were classified as
follows (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1995 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials............................................... $21,066 $ 34,257
Work in progress............................................ 34,138 48,654
Finished goods.............................................. 19,549 26,053
Machine shop inventory...................................... 3,499 4,179
------- --------
$78,252 $113,143
======= ========
</TABLE>
(e) Property, Plant and Equipment -- Property, plant and equipment is
recorded at cost. Major renewals and betterments which extend the useful life of
an asset are capitalized; routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as
incurred. Total maintenance and repairs expense charged against earnings was
approximately $23,090,000, $24,639,000 and $28,550,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996,
respectively. Upon sale or retirement of these assets, the asset cost and
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any related
gain or loss is reflected in income.
Depreciation for financial reporting purposes is principally provided using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as
follows: buildings -- 25 to 40 years; machinery and equipment -- 5 to 20 years.
Property, plant and equipment under capital leases are amortized over the
shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the term of the lease.
Accelerated methods are used for income tax purposes, where permitted.
(f) Machinery Repair Parts -- Machinery repair parts are capitalized when
purchased and are expensed, at cost, as they are used in the course of
operations. These parts are recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable
value in the accompanying balance sheets.
(g) Intangibles -- Intangible assets consist principally of the excess
purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired
("goodwill"), which is principally amortized over a 40 year life. The related
amortization expense was $1,117,000, $1,733,000 and $2,013,000 for the years
ended December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively. Total accumulated
amortization was $7,045,000 and $9,058,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1996,
respectively. After an acquisition, the Company continually reviews whether
subsequent events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining
estimated useful life of goodwill may warrant revision or that the remaining
balance of goodwill may not be recoverable. If events and circumstances indicate
that goodwill related to a particular business should be reviewed for possible
impairment, the Company uses projections to assess whether future operating
income of the business is expected to exceed the goodwill amortization over the
remaining life of the goodwill, to determine whether a write-down of goodwill to
recoverable value (as determined by the same projections) is appropriate.
(h) Environmental Liabilities -- The Company's operations and products are
subject to Federal, state, local and foreign regulatory requirements relating to
environmental protection. It is the Company's policy to comply fully with all
such applicable requirements. The Company may be subject to potential
liabilities for the costs of environmental remediation at currently or
previously owned or operated sites or sites to which it, or predecessor owners,
transported materials.
34
<PAGE> 35
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
It is the Company's policy to accrue for the estimated cost of
environmental matters, on a non-discounted basis, when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably
estimated. Such provisions and accruals exclude claims for recoveries from
insurance carriers or other third parties. Such claims, are recognized as
receivables only if realization is probable.
Statement of Position ("SOP") 96-1, "Environmental Remediation Liabilities"
was issued in October 1996 and will be adopted by the Company in 1997. This SOP
provides authoritative guidance on specific accounting issues that are present
in the recognition, measurement and disclosure of environmental remediation
liabilities. Management does not believe that the impact of adopting this SOP
will have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.
(i) Revenue -- Revenue is recognized when goods are shipped to the
customer. Estimated sales returns and allowances are recognized as an offset
against revenue in the period in which the related revenue is recognized.
(j) Foreign Currency Translation -- The functional currency for the
European Subsidiaries is the applicable local currency. The translation from the
applicable foreign currencies to U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet
accounts using current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and
for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange rate prevailing
during the period. The gains or losses resulting from such translation are
included in stockholders' equity. Gains or losses resulting from foreign
currency transactions are included in other income and were not material in
1996.
(k) Use of estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(3) U.S. CAN CORPORATION STOCK OFFERING
On November 7, 1994, the Corporation completed a public offering of
2,300,000 shares of Common Stock. At a public offering price of $16.00 per share
of Common Stock, the net proceeds to the Corporation were approximately $34.2
million. The Corporation contributed the net proceeds to the capital of U.S.
Can. The net proceeds were used by U.S. Can to prepay a portion of the
outstanding balance on its revolving line of credit. Had the offering occurred
on January 1, 1994 unaudited pro forma earnings per share would have been $1.54
for the year ended December 31, 1994 based on Common Stock equivalent shares of
12,718,000.
Salomon Brothers Inc. ("Salomon Brothers") a common stockholder of the
Corporation, received an underwriting discount in connection with the offering
in the aggregate amount of approximately $833,000.
In March 1994, 1995 and 1996, the Corporation contributed shares of Common
Stock, valued at $850,000, $1,063,000 and $425,000, respectively, to U.S. Can's
Salaried Employees Savings and Retirement Accumulation Plan.
(4) ACQUISITIONS AND ASSET PURCHASES
On January 20, 1994, the Company acquired all the outstanding capital stock
of Steeltin Can Corporation ("Steeltin Can") and substantially all the assets of
two affiliated companies, Eastern Container Company, Inc. ("ECC") and Eastern
Metal Decorating, Inc. ("EMD") collectively referred to as "Steeltin"). The
total cost of the three transactions was approximately $19.1 million in cash and
assumption of approximately $1.6 million of debt and was financed by U.S. Can's
then existing revolving credit line and a supplemental credit facility provided
to U.S. Can by one of its senior lenders. Of the $20.7 million total purchase
price, $11.9 million related to Steeltin Can, $3.6 million to ECC, and $5.2
million to EMD.
35
<PAGE> 36
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
On March 30, 1994, the Company acquired all the outstanding capital stock
of Ellisco Inc. ("Ellisco") for $32.2 million. The cost of the transaction was
financed by the remaining availability under the supplemental credit facility
granted for the Steeltin acquisition and a portion of a second supplemental
credit facility provided to U.S. Can by one of its senior lenders.
Also during 1994, the Company acquired the capital stock or assets of four
other businesses for an aggregate of $1 million in Common Sock, $350,000 in
assumed debt and $6.2 million in cash.
During 1995, the Company acquired four businesses for an aggregate of
approximately $30.2 million in cash, plus contingent payments of up to $2.5
million, and the assumption of approximately $6.7 million in debt. The cash
portion of the purchase prices was financed primarily from borrowings under U.S.
Can's revolving line of credit.
On April 29, 1996, the Company acquired from Alltrista Corporation
("Alltrista"), for approximately $9.6 million, substantially all of the
machinery, equipment and coatings and inks inventory of, as well as certain
proprietary technology used in, Alltrista Metal Services ("AMS"), a division of
Alltrista (collectively, the "Assets"), and assumed a liability of $0.5 million.
The Company also purchased the Chicago, Illinois, Baltimore, Maryland and
Trussville, Alabama real property and buildings formerly used in AMS's business
for $4.8 million. In a related transaction, in June 1996, the Company completed
the purchase of AMS's remaining inventory for $8 million. The acquisitions were
financed with borrowings under U.S. Can's revolving line of credit. In July
1996, the Company discontinued operations at two of the former AMS plants.
On August 2, 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the
outstanding capital stock of three related companies, CPI Plastics, Inc., CP
Ohio, Inc. and CP Illinois, Inc. (collectively, the "CPI Group"), engaged in
manufacturing molded plastic drums and pails and poultry products. The Company
paid $15.1 million in cash to the stockholders of the CPI Group, subject to
contingent payments (in an amount not to exceed $1 million) based upon the CPI
Group's financial performance through 1997. This acquisition was financed with
borrowings under a special acquisition line of credit provided to U.S. Can by
its senior lenders.
On September 11, 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of a portion
of Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.'s ("Crown") European aerosol can business
("USC Europe") for $51.1 million and the assumption of debt of $5.8 million.
This acquisition included manufacturing operations in the United Kingdom,
France, Spain and Germany and the aerosol can manufacturing equipment and assets
from a Crown facility in Italy. USC Europe comprises the majority of the
European Subsidiaries. The Company incurred $3.5 million of costs in completing
this acquisition which have been included in total acquisition costs.
Each of the foregoing business acquisitions was accounted for as a purchase
for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of the
acquired companies were revalued to estimated fair values as of the acquisition
date. Such revaluation adjustments, all made pursuant to the purchase method of
accounting, resulted in increased amortization and depreciation in periods
following the acquisitions. Management has used the best available information
in estimating the fair value of those assets and liabilities. However, such
estimates are subject to change pending finalization of property appraisals,
plant consolidation requirements and other studies. Changes, if any, to these
estimates are not expected to be material.
36
<PAGE> 37
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The following is a summary of the preliminary allocation of the aggregate
purchase price of the CPI Group and USC Europe acquisitions (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Current assets.............................................. $ 51,157
Property, plant and equipment............................... 59,350
Other assets................................................ 1,135
Current liabilities......................................... (37,709)
Other liabilities........................................... (10,568)
--------
Net assets........................................... 63,365
Resulting goodwill.......................................... 6,405
--------
Total acquisition costs.............................. $ 69,770
========
</TABLE>
The operating results of each acquired business are included in the
consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. Amortization
of excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets
acquired is made over a period of forty years. All acquired companies, other
than those comprising USC Europe, have since been merged with U.S. Can.
The following data represents the Company's unaudited pro forma 1994
results of operations as if the significant acquisitions of Steeltin and Ellisco
had occurred on January 1, 1994 and the Company's unaudited pro forma 1995 and
1996 results of operations as if the significant acquisitions of the CPI Group
and USC Europe had occurred on January 1 of the applicable year (000's omitted,
except per share data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales....................................... $573,053 $774,942 $867,791
Income before extraordinary item................ 17,691 5,411 17,879
Net income...................................... 17,691 5,411 12,629
Per Share Data:
Income before extraordinary item................ $ 1.65 $ 0.42 $ 1.37
Net income...................................... $ 1.65 $ 0.42 $ 0.96
</TABLE>
The pro forma operating results include each businesses' pre-acquisition
results of operations for the indicated years with adjustments to reflect
amortization of goodwill, additional depreciation on the increases to the fair
market value of fixed assets, interest expense on the acquisition borrowings and
the effect of income taxes thereon. The pro forma information given above does
not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have been
obtained if the operations were combined during the periods presented and is not
intended to be a projection of future results or trends.
On August 16, 1996, the Company completed its $1.3 million acquisition of a
site in the Dallas, Texas area for the establishment of a paint and general line
manufacturing plant. The decision to expand manufacturing capabilities in the
Southwest followed the Company's agreement with one of its major coating
customers on the material terms of a long-term supply arrangement. In October
1996, the Company and this customer signed a definitive long-term supply
agreement. This Texas facility will initially produce gallon round paint cans
for the coatings industry. In the future, if circumstances warrant, the Company
may expand this facility to include production of certain of its other products.
The Company has selected Merthyr Tydfil, U.K. as the site of a new aerosol
container manufacturing facility. This plant, expected to be operational in
mid-1997, represents an initial investment of $28.5 million (expended over two
to three years), and will supply The Gillette Company's North Atlantic
operations.
37
<PAGE> 38
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(5) DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The primary debt obligations of the Company at December 31, 1995 and 1996,
consisted of the following (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Senior debt --
Revolving line of credit............................... $ 57,700 $ 34,700
Term loan.............................................. 31,500 --
Secured equipment notes................................ 16,819 12,021
Capital lease obligations.............................. 29,100 35,894
Secured term loan...................................... -- 9,122
Industrial revenue bonds............................... 7,500 7,500
Mortgages and other.................................... 1,957 1,573
-------- --------
144,576 100,810
Less -- Current maturities............................... (17,216) (11,928)
-------- --------
Total senior debt................................. 127,360 88,882
-------- --------
Senior subordinated 13 1/2% notes........................ 100,000 --
Senior subordinated 10 1/8% notes........................ -- 275,000
-------- --------
Total long-term debt.............................. $227,360 $363,882
======== ========
</TABLE>
On April 29, 1994, U.S. Can entered into a four-year credit agreement (the
"Senior Credit Agreement") with a group of banks providing a $130 million line
of credit consisting of a $95 million revolving credit facility (the "Revolving
Credit Facility") and a $35 million term loan. Funds available under the Senior
Credit agreement have been used for working capital and other general corporate
purposes, including acquisitions. The loans outstanding under the Senior Credit
Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to, at the election of U.S.
Can, one of the following: (i) the Base Rate per annum, or (ii) based on the
current pricing ratio, a reserve-adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 1.000% per annum,
for specified interest periods (selected by U.S. Can) of one, two, three, or six
months. The "Base Rate" is the higher of: (i) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%
per annum or (ii) the rate of interest publicly announced from time to time by
the Bank of America Illinois, Chicago, Illinois as its "reference rate." The
weighted average interest rate of the loans outstanding under the Senior Credit
Agreement was 6.9% and 6.7% at December 31, 1995 and 1996, respectively. For
letters of credit issued under the Senior Credit Agreement, U.S. Can pays fees
equal to: (a) the applicable Eurodollar Margin, currently 1.0% per annum,
multiplied by the aggregate face amount outstanding on each such letter of
credit and (b) an amount payable to the issuing bank equal to 0.2% per annum of
the aggregate face amount outstanding on each such letter of credit, both of
which are payable quarterly in arrears. Currently, U.S. Can is required to pay a
commitment fee of 0.325% per annum of the average daily unused portion of each
lender's commitment under the Senior Credit Agreement. Obligations under the
Senior Credit Agreement are secured by U.S. Can's inventories and accounts
receivable, and the term loan, while it was outstanding, was also secured by a
mortgage on, and certain equipment located at, U.S. Can's Elgin, Illinois plant.
In early April 1996, the senior lenders provided a temporary $10 million
increase in the Revolving Credit Facility due to seasonal inventory
requirements. In late April 1996, the senior lenders provided an additional
temporary $20 million increase in the Revolving Credit Facility to fund the
acquisition of AMS. In July 1996, the senior lenders provided the Company with
an additional line of credit of $97 million (the "Acquisition Facility") to fund
certain permitted acquisitions, including the acquisitions of the CPI Group and
USC Europe. In connection with USC Europe acquisition, the Company pledged 65%
of the stock of the European Subsidiaries pursuant to the amended terms of the
Senior Credit Agreement. All of the supplemental facilities, including the
Acquisition Facility, were terminated, and a substantial portion of the
outstanding
38
<PAGE> 39
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
balance under the Revolving Credit Facility was repaid, on October 17, 1996
coinciding with the issuance of the 10 1/8% Notes described below and at that
time, the pledge of 65% of the stock of the European Subsidiaries was
terminated. U.S. Can repaid the term loan on December 16, 1996, using funds from
additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 1996, U.S. Can had borrowings of $34.7 million
outstanding under the Senior Credit Agreement, $11.8 million in letters of
credit issued pursuant thereto, and $48.5 million of unused credit remained
available.
Secured equipment notes, issued at various times since 1990, mature in
varying amounts from 1997 to 2003 and bear interest at various rates between
8.1% and 10.4%. Proceeds from these notes were used to purchase certain
manufacturing equipment, and the notes are secured by that equipment.
Capital lease obligations, including $6.8 million of such obligations
incurred by the European Subsidiaries, mature in varying amounts from 1997 to
2007 and bear interest at various rates between 4.57% and 9.80%. Other debt,
consisting of various governmental loans and real estate mortgages at interest
rates between 7.0% and 9.25%, mature at various times through 2025, and were
used to finance the expansion of several manufacturing facilities. Included in
other assets as of December 31, 1995 and 1996 are proceeds of $3.5 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, from certain industrial revenue bonds which are
restricted for the relocation and expansion of the Company's Wheeling, West
Virginia plant.
On December 20, 1996, U.K. Can, Ltd., one of the European Subsidiaries,
entered into (and U.S. Can guaranteed) a $28 million secured term loan with
General Electric Capital Corporation, to finance the acquisition of land,
building and equipment comprising the Merthyr Tydfil, Wales aerosol can
production facility. This credit facility, under which $9.1 million was drawn as
of December 31, 1996, is secured by the real and personal property of U.S. Can's
Merthyr Tydfil operation.
On December 26, 1991, U.S. Can issued $100.0 million principal amount of
$13 1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2002 (the "13 1/2% Notes"). The 13 1/2%
Notes have since been entirely redeemed as described below.
On October 17, 1996, the Corporation issued $275.0 million principal amount
of 10 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 in a private placement. These
notes are expected to be exchanged in late February 1997 for similar notes which
are publicly registered. These notes (collectively, the "10 1/8% Notes") are
unsecured and are subordinated to all other senior debt of the Corporation and
its subsidiaries. The 10 1/8% Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on
an unsecured senior subordinated basis by U.S. Can. On or after October 15,
2001, the Corporation may, at its option, redeem all or some of the 10 1/8%
Notes at declining redemption premiums which begin at approximately 105.1% in
2001. Upon a change of control of the Corporation, as defined, the Noteholders
could require that the Corporation repurchase all or some of the 10 1/8% Notes
at a 101% premium.
Net proceeds from the issuance of the 10 1/8% Notes were $268.1 million and
were used to pay down amounts under the Senior Credit Agreement ($158.4
million), with $109.7 million being placed in an escrow account and subsequently
used to redeem all of the 13 1/2% Notes. The amounts placed in the escrow
account were invested in U.S Government obligations and were required, pursuant
to the amended and restated escrow agreement, to be used by the escrow agent to
redeem the 13 1/2% Notes on or immediately after the earliest redemption date
(January 15, 1997) of such notes. Such redemption, which included a $4 million
premium and unpaid interest earned on the 13 1/2% Notes through the redemption
date, occurred on January 15, 1997. Considering the interest income which had
accrued on the funds in the escrow account, the Company received $0.4 million of
proceeds back from the escrow agent after the redemption. The Company recorded
the early extinguishment of the 13 1/2% Notes as of October 17, 1996 which
resulted in an extraordinary charge in the fourth quarter of 1996 of $5.2
million (net of income taxes of $3.5 million) representing the difference
39
<PAGE> 40
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
between the $109.7 million placed in escrow less the $0.4 million refunded and
the October 17, 1996, carrying value of the 13 1/2% Notes, related accrued
interest and related unamortized deferred financing costs.
Based upon borrowing rates currently available to the Company for
borrowings with similar terms and maturities, the fair value of the Company's
debt was approximately $264 million and $377 million as of December 31, 1995 and
1996, respectively. No quoted market value is available (except on the 10 1/8%
Notes). These amounts, because they do not include certain costs such as
prepayment penalties, do not represent the amount the Company would have to pay
to reacquire and retire all of its outstanding debt in a current transaction.
Financing costs related to the issuance of new debt are deferred and
amortized over the terms of the related debt agreements. Net deferred financing
costs are recorded as other assets in the accompanying balance sheets.
The Company paid interest on borrowings, excluding amounts paid into the
escrow, of $22,116,000, $24,693,000 and $28,159,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996,
respectively. As of December 31, 1995 and 1996, accrued interest on borrowings
totaled $6,771,000 and $5,989,000 respectively.
The Company's debt agreements, including the Senior Credit Agreement,
contain various financial and other restrictive covenants. Certain of such
agreements also contain cross-default provisions. The Company was in compliance
with all covenants as of December 31, 1996. During 1996, certain of such
covenants were amended.
The more restrictive of the Company's covenants, as amended and defined in
the credit agreements, require an earnings to interest expense on borrowings
ratio of 2.0, a cash flow from operations to interest expense on borrowings
ratio of 1.5 and a funded debt to adjusted earnings ratio of 4.0 for the year
ended December 31, 1996. Additionally, the debt agreements required a minimum
current ratio, excluding current maturities of long-term debt, of 1.5 as of
December 31, 1996, and limit the distribution of dividends, the incurrence of
additional debt, capital expenditures, asset sales and lease commitments.
Compliance with these covenants is determined using methods as defined in the
related agreements. Certain covenants become more restrictive on a graduated
bases, as set forth in the related agreements.
The terms of the Senior Credit Agreement and the 10 1/8% Notes impose
restrictions that affect, among other things, the Company and U.S. Can's ability
to (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) create liens on assets, (iii) sell
assets, (iv) engage in mergers, acquisitions or consolidations, (v) make
investments, (vi) pay dividends or make distributions and (vii) engage in
certain transactions with affiliates and subsidiaries.
Under the Senior Credit Agreement and as defined therein, U.S. Can may pay
cash dividends on account of any shares of any class of capital stock of U.S.
Can (or only any warrants, options or rights with respect thereto) in an amount
not to exceed 25% of Net Income in any given fiscal year but in any event not
more than 25% of consolidated cumulative Net Income attributable to the period
commencing April 29, 1994, and ending on the date of such proposed cash
dividends at any time that either (i) the Term Loan has been indefeasibly paid
in full in cash or (ii) the Leverage Ratio as of the last day of the last fiscal
quarter of any fiscal year does not exceed 3.50 to 1.00, but in no event may
U.S. Can pay such cash dividends prior to the later to occur of (a) April 29,
1995 and (b) the delivery of the annual audited consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year ended in which either of the conditions contained
in clause (i) or (ii) next above have been satisfied; and provided that no
Default or Event of Default exists immediately prior to any Restricted Payment
otherwise permitted.
The Senior Credit Agreement also contains subjective covenants providing
that U.S. Can would be in default if, in the judgment of the lenders, there is a
material adverse change in the financial condition of U.S. Can. Management is
not aware of, nor does it anticipate, any facts, events or occurrences which
could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the operations
of U.S. Can that would cause the
40
<PAGE> 41
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
lenders to demand repayment of the amounts borrowed under the Senior Credit
Agreement prior to April 29, 1998. Accordingly, the borrowings under these
agreements have been classified as long-term debt in the accompanying December
31, 1996 balance sheet.
Under existing agreements, maturities of long-term debt as of December 31,
1996 (including capital lease obligations), are as follows (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997................................... $ 11,928
1998................................... 46,040
1999................................... 8,589
2000................................... 3,817
2001................................... 4,924
Thereafter............................. 300,512
--------
$375,810
========
</TABLE>
(6) INCOME TAXES
The Company does not provide for U. S. income taxes which would be payable
if undistributed earnings of the European Subsidiaries were remitted to the U.S.
because the Company either considers these earnings to be invested for an
indefinite period or anticipates that if such earnings were distributed, the
U.S. income taxes payable would be substantially offset by foreign tax credits.
Such unremitted earnings as of December 31, 1996 were $511,000.
The provision for income taxes before extraordinary item in the statements
of operations consisted of the following (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current............................................. $ 9,801 $4,175 $ 8,118
Deferred............................................ 3,592 (567) 4,257
Foreign............................................. -- -- 299
------- ------ -------
Total.......................................... $13,393 $3,608 $12,674
======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
In 1996, domestic pretax earnings were $28,865,000 and foreign pretax
earnings were $810,000. Income taxes, net of refunds, of $10,955,000, $5,810,000
and $2,871,000 were paid in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively.
The principal items comprising the difference between taxes on income
before income taxes and extraordinary item computed at the Federal statutory
rate and the actual provision for income taxes for the years presented were as
follows (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Tax provision computed at the statutory rates....... $11,187 $2,566 $10,386
Nondeductible amortization of intangible assets..... 347 320 445
State taxes, net of Federal benefit................. 1,566 436 1,347
Other, net.......................................... 293 286 496
------- ------ -------
Provision for income taxes..................... $13,393 $3,608 $12,674
======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
Deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax
effects of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets
and liabilities given the provisions of the enacted tax laws. The
41
<PAGE> 42
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
tax effect of significant temporary differences representing deferred income tax
benefits and obligations consisted of the following (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1995 DECEMBER 31, 1996
---------------------- ----------------------
BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS
-------- ----------- -------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Vacation accrual....................... $ 2,900 $ -- $ 3,352 $ --
Debt extinguishment costs.............. -- -- 2,686 --
Overhead reduction reserves............ 3,043 -- 1,454 --
Postretirement benefits................ 10,233 -- 10,682 --
Workers' compensation accrual.......... 1,017 -- 1,067 --
Pension accrual........................ 2,078 -- 2,026 --
Inventory valuation reserves........... -- (8,802) -- (7,443)
Depreciation........................... -- (31,673) -- (38,474)
Alternative minimum tax credit
carryforwards........................ 3,373 -- 4,195 --
Other.................................. 6,834 (2,233) 5,621 (3,686)
------- -------- ------- --------
Total deferred income tax benefits
(obligations)................... $29,478 $(42,708) $31,083 $(49,603)
======= ======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
Other than as described below, the Company did not record any valuation
allowances against deferred income tax benefits at December 31, 1995 or 1996, as
all such benefits are expected to be realized as tax deductions in future tax
returns.
In addition to the above deferred benefits and obligations, a German
subsidiary of the Company has net operating loss carryforward credits of
approximately $1.8 million. Some of the European subsidiaries have other net
deferred income tax assets primarily due to operating losses (not significant)
and non-deductible reserves. The Company has established a 100% valuation
allowance of $2.0 million against the European Subsidiaries' net deferred income
tax assets as of December 31, 1996 as realization of the related tax benefit is
not assured. If such assets are, in fact, realized in a future period, the
resulting benefit will reduce the future period's income tax expense.
(7) OVERHEAD REDUCTION PROVISION
The Company recorded a pretax charge of approximately $8 million in the
fourth quarter of 1995 related to actions taken to reduce overhead expenses and
to eliminate redundant manufacturing capacity. The primary components of the
charge include costs associated with severance packages for a number of
identified salaried employees throughout the Company (41 employees for $2.0
million) and with the Company's Saddle Brook, New Jersey manufacturing facility
(43 employees for $1.2 million) which has been closed as part of the
consolidation of the Company's metal pail business into the Company's North
Brunswick, New Jersey manufacturing facility. This closing did not have a
material ongoing adverse effect on the Company's operating results as a majority
of the business carried on at the Saddle Brook facility is now conducted at the
North Brunswick facility. The principal plant closure costs include severance to
affected employees, the write down to net realizable value of assets to be
disposed of ($2.4 million) and estimated costs associated with the facility's
operating lease. The majority of such severance and other costs have been
expended as of December 31, 1996. All scheduled employee terminations have been
completed.
The Company continuously evaluates the composition of its various
manufacturing facilities in light of current and expected market conditions and
demand. While no plans currently exist to further consolidate plant operations,
such actions may be deemed appropriate in the future.
42
<PAGE> 43
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(8) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company maintains separate noncontributory pension and defined
contribution plans covering most domestic hourly employees and all domestic
salaried personnel, respectively. It is the Company's policy to fund accrued
pension and defined contribution plan costs in compliance with ERISA
requirements. The total cost of these plans charged against earnings was
approximately $4,782,000, $5,851,000 and $6,070,000 for 1994, 1995 and 1996,
respectively.
The following table sets forth the funded status of the Company's domestic
defined benefit pension plans, at December 31, 1995 and 1996 (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of benefit obligation --
Vested benefits........................................... $19,376 $20,418
Nonvested benefits........................................ 1,673 2,059
------- -------
Accumulated benefit obligation.............................. 21,049 22,477
Effect of projected future compensation levels.............. -- --
------- -------
Projected benefit obligation................................ 21,049 22,477
Plan assets at fair value................................... 18,386 20,707
------- -------
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets....... 2,663 1,770
Unrecognized net gain (loss)................................ (482) 85
Unrecognized prior-service cost............................. (631) (1,033)
Unrecognized transition liability to be amortized over 15
years..................................................... (398) (332)
Adjustment required to recognize additional minimum
liability................................................. 1,511 1,280
------- -------
Accrued pension costs.................................. $ 2,663 $ 1,770
======= =======
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995, the Company reclassified certain reserves related to
plant consolidation and restructuring programs started prior to 1991 into
accrued pension costs as such reserves related solely to pension benefits due to
employees affected by the programs. Additionally, consolidation expenses, which
represented the interest charges on these discounted reserves, are now reported
as part of the Company's net periodic pension cost.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 87 -- "Employers' Accounting
for Pensions," the Company recorded an additional minimum liability at the end
of 1995 and 1996 representing the excess of the accumulated benefit obligation
over the plan assets at fair value and the unfunded accrued pension cost. The
additional minimum liability was offset to the extent possible by an intangible
asset. Because the asset recognized may not exceed the amount of unrecognized
prior-service cost and unrecognized transition liability, the balance of the
offset of the additional minimum liability was reported as a reduction of
retained earnings, net of related income tax benefits.
The projected benefit obligation as of December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996 was
determined using an assumed discount rate of 8.0%, 7.5% and 7.5%, respectively.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining net
periodic pension cost was 7.5%, 8.0% and 8.0% in 1994, 1995, and 1996,
respectively. The plan has a flat benefit formula; accordingly, the effect of
projected future compensation levels is zero. The plan's assets consist
primarily of shares of the Corporation's common stock, equity and bond funds,
corporate bonds and investment contracts with insurance companies.
43
<PAGE> 44
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Net periodic pension costs for the Company's domestic defined benefit
pension plan for the years ended December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996 included the
following components (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost on benefits earned during the year............. $ 667 $ 625 $ 690
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation............... 1,034 1,085 1,133
Actual return on plan assets................................ 242 (1,562) (1,166)
Net amortization and deferral............................... (672) 1,041 507
------ ------- -------
Net periodic pension cost................................... $1,271 $ 1,189 $ 1,164
====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
In addition, hourly employees at eight plants are covered by
union-sponsored, collectively bargained, multi-employer pension plans. The
Company contributed to these plans and charged to expense approximately
$885,000, $1,203,000 and $1,519,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively. The
contributions are generally determined in accordance with the provisions of the
negotiated labor contracts and are generally based on a per employee per week
amount.
While the Company does provide limited severance and certain supplemental
unemployment benefits for certain domestic employees in connection with certain
collective bargaining agreements, benefits paid under these arrangements have
been and are expected to continue to be minimal. Postemployment benefits
associated with overhead reduction and plant consolidation programs are
appropriately provided.
In Europe, the Company maintains two defined benefit plans for certain of
its employees in the United Kingdom and in France. The United Kingdom plan
benefits are based primarily on years of service and employee compensation. As
of December 31, 1996, the preliminary actuarially-determined accumulated benefit
obligation was $28.8 million with such amount being fully funded.
The French plan benefits are based primarily on length of employee service.
As of December 31, 1996, the actuarially-determined accumulated benefit
obligation was approximately $1,386,000 (all non-vested). This plan is not
funded. The aggregate net pension expense in 1996, from the date of the USC
Europe acquisition, for these two plans was approximately $156,000.
(9) POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company provides health and life insurance benefits for certain
domestic retired employees in connection with certain collective bargaining
agreements.
Net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the Company's domestic
postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 1994, 1995 and
1996, included the following components (000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost on benefits earned during the year............. $ 292 $ 333 $ 388
Amortization of net loss.................................... 60 -- --
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation................................................ 1,758 1,836 1,851
------ ------ ------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost............. $2,110 $2,169 $2,239
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE> 45
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The Company's postretirement benefit plans currently are not funded. The
status of the plans at December 31, 1995 and 1996, is as follows (000's
omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation --
Retirees, beneficiaries and dependents of retirees........ $16,441 $15,687
Active employees and dependents........................... 10,314 10,381
------- -------
Total accumulated postretirement benefit obligation......... 26,775 26,068
Unrecognized net loss....................................... 3,038 1,700
------- -------
Accrued postretirement benefit costs................. $23,717 $24,368
======= =======
</TABLE>
The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation was 12% in 1994, 11% in 1995 and 10% in 1996,
gradually declining to 7% by the year 1999 and remaining at that level
thereafter. A one-percentage-point increase in the assumed health care cost
trend rate for each year would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation as of December 31, 1996, by approximately $2,880,000 and the total of
the service and interest cost components of net postretirement benefit cost for
the year then ended by approximately $280,000. The assumed discount rate used in
determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 8.0%, 7.5% and
7.5%, in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively.
An executive, director and stockholder of the Corporation is eligible to
receive postretirement benefits under a non-qualified supplemental benefit plan.
During 1994, 1995 and 1996, $298,000, $364,000 and $380,000, respectively, was
charged to expense for benefits earned under this plan. As of December 31, 1995
and 1996, the Company had recorded a liability of $2,580,000 and $2,960,000,
respectively, for benefits for which the executive was fully eligible to receive
at that date. The principal source of funding for this obligation is an
insurance policy on the executive's life on which the Company is currently
paying the premium. The cash surrender value, net of appropriate reserves, is
reflected as a component of other assets.
(10) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Aerosol containers, the Company's principal product, have historically been
subject to criticism on environmental grounds. While the Company believes that
aerosol can technology is environmentally sound, unfavorable legislation or
regulation relating to aerosols could reduce the number of aerosol containers
used by the Company's customers, which could have a material adverse effect on
the Company. Several states have enacted legislation requiring reformulation of
aerosol product propellants and many of the Company's customers have responded
to meet such relevant new standards.
The Company's domestic and foreign operations are subject to extensive
governmental regulatory requirements relating to environmental protection. As
part of its compliance effort, management has commissioned outside technical
consultants to work in concert with the Company's internal environment group to
implement a company-wide environmental auditing program. Based on the audit
results and reports prepared in connection with its acquisitions, management
believes that the Company's current operations are in substantial compliance
with applicable environmental laws and regulations, the violation of which could
have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is in the process of
integrating the European Subsidiaries into its environmental management system
and will be evaluating its ongoing compliance responsibilities during this
process. There can be no assurance, however, that currently unknown matters, new
laws and regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws and
regulations will not materially affect the Company's business or operations in
the future.
The Company has made and expects to continue to make, significant capital
expenditures to upgrade its facilities in accordance with current and pending
environmental regulations. Most notably, the Company has
45
<PAGE> 46
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
undertaken an approximately $8.3 million program (of which $6.2 million had been
spent as of December 31, 1996) to upgrade its lithography centers to comply with
scheduled Clean Air Act requirements in the United States.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company's reserves for future ascertainable
costs of environmental remediation in the United States were approximately
$400,000. Management does not believe that such costs, if any, in excess of the
reserve will have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations or financial condition. In making this assessment, the Company
considered all information available to it including its and others companies'
reported prior experience in dealing with such matters, data released by the EPA
and reports by independent environmental consultants regarding certain matters.
In estimating the ascertainable costs of environmental remediation, management
has not taken into account (i) any potential insurance recovery or (ii)
indemnification rights to which it may be entitled. In conjunction with its
acquisitions, the Company routinely obtains indemnification for environmental
matters from the sellers. Such indemnification is typically subject to varying
"baskets" or deductibles and maximum limitations and is ultimately subject to
the credit-worthiness of the indemnitor.
With respect to the European Subsidiaries, no subsurface sampling has been
performed to identify possible contamination. Several of the facilities have
been operating at their locations for more than ten years and according to a
survey conducted by an independent environmental consultant it is likely that
there have been releases of hazardous substances at these locations in the past.
However, management has been advised by an independent environmental consultant
familiar with United Kingdom and German law and policy with respect to
remediation requirements that the local authorities are unlikely to propose or
enforce stringent remediation requirements which would affect the commercial
viability of either the German or the British facilities given their location in
heavily industrialized areas. Moreover, the Company has been indemnified by
Crown as to environmental conditions at these sites. Management believes that
any future requirement to remediate these sites will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
The Company understands that the groundwater in San Leandro, California
(formerly a site of one of the Company's can assembly facilities) is
contaminated at shallow and intermediate depths, and that the area of concern
partially extends to the groundwater below the facility formerly owned by the
Company. In January, 1997, the Company received the results from on-site
investigations conducted by an independent environmental consultant. Those
results indicated that, while no evidence of soil contamination in studied areas
was found, there is a substantial probability that soil beneath one area of the
facility has had an impact on site groundwater. Additionally, groundwater in the
vicinity has been impacted by contaminants which appear to be migrating on-site
from upgradient sources. Recently, the Company received a notice requiring that
they deliver a work plan to develop a site characterization report on the site
sampling and investigative results no later than March 3, 1997. The San Leandro
facility was closed in 1989 and was subsequently sold. In connection with the
sale, the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser against any environmental
claims related to the Company's ownership of the property.
On February 28, 1995, an affiliate of Peter Kiewit Sons, Inc. ("Kiewit"),
filed a Complaint against U.S. Can and others in the United States District
Court of the State of New Jersey, asserting claims based upon alleged indemnity
obligations of U.S. Can to Kiewit, arising from the 1987 acquisition by U.S. Can
of the general packaging business of Kiewit's predecessor. These alleged
indemnity obligations relate to environmental liabilities, reimbursable
insurance deductibles and reinsurance amounts, and certain personal injury and
employment discrimination claims. In an initial discovery disclosure served on
U.S. Can, Kiewit alleged that its damages to the date of such disclosure were
approximately $4.4 million. U.S. Can has filed an Answer to the Complaint,
asserted affirmative defenses and made counterclaims against Kiewit seeking
reimbursement for expenses and accruals relating to postretirement medical and
life insurance benefits for former employees of the general packaging business,
and expenses incurred as a result of Kiewit's predecessor's breach of its
46
<PAGE> 47
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
contractual indemnification obligations to U.S. Can. The case has been
transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois. U.S. Can believes it has meritorious defenses to all of Kiewit's
claims, and that resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
The National Labor Relations Board has issued a decision finding the
Company in violation of certain sections of the National Labor Relations Act as
a result of the Company's closure of a facility in 1991 and failure to offer
inter-plant job opportunities to affected employees. Management does not believe
that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial condition or results of operations.
The Company, including the European Subsidiaries, is involved in various
other environmental and legal actions and administrative proceedings. Management
is of the opinion that their outcome will not have a material effect on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
The Company has entered into agreements to lease certain property under
terms which qualify as capital leases. Capital leases consist primarily of data
processing equipment and various production machinery and equipment. Most
capital leases contain renewal options and some contain purchase options. The
December 31, 1995 and 1996 capital lease asset balances were $39,634,000 and
$51,562,000, net of accumulated amortization of $13,150,000 and $19,016,000,
respectively. Capital lease obligations extend through 2115. Capital lease
additions included as capital expenditures in the accompanying statements of
cash flows were $8,157,000, $5,802,000 and $2,087,000, in 1994, 1995 and 1996,
respectively.
The Company also maintains operating leases on various plant and office
facilities and office equipment. Rent expense under operating leases for the
years ended December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996, was $5,955,000, $8,090,000, and
$9,198,000, respectively.
At December 31, 1996 minimum payments due under these leases are as follows
(000's omitted):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CAPITAL OPERATING
LEASES LEASES
------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
1997...................................................... $ 8,269 $ 7,434
1998...................................................... 8,248 8,141
1999...................................................... 7,051 4,100
2000...................................................... 4,994 3,309
2001...................................................... 6,236 2,346
Thereafter................................................ 14,358 8,487
-------- -------
Total minimum lease payments.............................. 49,156 $33,817
=======
Amount representing interest.............................. (13,262)
--------
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments
(including $5,544 classified as current)................ $ 35,894
========
</TABLE>
The Company was contingently liable for outstanding letters of credit
totaling $11.8 million as of December 31, 1996. Such letters of credits were
issued primarily to guarantee workers' compensation claims, which have been
accrued but not funded, and certain debt.
(11) STOCK OPTION PLANS
Incentive Stock Option Plan
The Corporation maintains an Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "ISO Plan")
for certain key employees of the Company. Directors who are not regular
employees of the Company are not eligible to participate in the ISO Plan. In
addition, no employee of the Company is eligible to participate in the ISO Plan
if such employee
47
<PAGE> 48
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
owns stock constituting 10% or more of the total voting power of the
Corporation. The Corporation has reserved 240,000 shares for issuance under the
ISO Plan. The exercise price for options granted under the ISO Plan may not be
less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date the
option is granted. Options under the plan may have a maximum term of 10 years
and are exercisable at the time specified by the Board of Directors. Payment
upon exercise of an option is to be in full, in either cash or shares of Common
Stock with a value equal to the option price, or a combination of the two.
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
The Corporation was a party to a Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under
which options to purchase a total of 300,000 shares were granted to an executive
officer and a former executive officer of the Company. During 1995, the
remaining 115,000 outstanding options were exercised.
1993 Option Plan
The Company maintains a non-qualified option plan (the "1993 Option Plan")
pursuant to which employees of the Company may be granted options to purchase up
to a total of 500,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share exercise price equal
to the per share market price of the Common Stock as of the date the option is
granted. Pursuant to the 1993 Option Plan, the Company has issued options to
purchase 496,375 shares of Common Stock at prices ranging from $12.00 to $21.50
per share. These options have a maximum term of 10 years and will vest over a
four-year period, 25% becoming fully vested on the first anniversary date of
their issuance, with the rest of the options vesting monthly in equal amounts
over the remaining three years.
1994 Option Plan
The Company maintains a non-qualified option plan (the "1994 Option Plan")
with provisions identical to the 1993 Option Plan. Pursuant to the 1994 Option
Plan, the Company has reserved 50,000 shares of Common Stock and has issued
options to purchase 47,000 shares of Common Stock at prices ranging from $15.75
to $19.00 per share.
Stock Purchase Plan
The Company maintains an annual non-qualified employee stock purchase plan
(the "Stock Purchase Plan") available to all salaried employees and certain
designated groups of hourly employees. The purpose of the plan is to promote
increased employee stock ownership in the Company and to provide a benefit to
employees. Participating employees are able to purchase shares of Common Stock
through payroll deductions. Each annual Stock Purchase Plan is in effect for a
one-year period. Eligible employees are able to elect to purchase shares of
Common Stock at a price equal to the current market price, less a 15% discount,
in an amount up to 7.5% of each participating employee's salary. Fifteen days
prior to the exercise date, each participant has the option to complete the
purchase of shares under the Stock Purchase Plan or to withdraw the amounts
withheld from the employee's salary pursuant to the plan. During 1994, 1995 and
1996, the Corporation issued Common Stock valued at $1,660,000, $1,569,000 and
$462,000 related to the Stock Purchase Plan. The Stock Purchase Plan established
for the 1996 - 1997 plan year has an exercise price of $14.556 per share.
Incentive Plan
In 1995, the Company adopted an equity incentive plan (the "Incentive
Plan") pursuant to which employees of the Company may be granted stock options
("Options"), stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and shares of restricted stock
("Restricted Shares"). The number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued
or transferred under this plan upon the exercise of Options or as Restricted
Shares may not exceed 650,000 shares. The exercise price of the Options may not
be less than 100% of the fair market value of the
48
<PAGE> 49
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
underlying stock on the date of the grant. Options have a maximum term of ten
years and are exercisable at the time specified by the Board of Directors.
Options granted under the Incentive Plan may be either incentive stock
options ("ISOs") or non-qualified stock options ("NSOs"). Pursuant to the
Incentive Plan, the Company has issued ISOs to purchase 189,500 shares of Common
Stock at prices ranging from $16.50 to $20.875 per share and NSOs to purchase
5,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $18.75 per share.
SARs may be granted in connection with any Option granted under the
Incentive Plan, either at the time of the Option grant or any time thereafter
during the term of the Option. SARs entitle the holder of the related Option to
surrender to the Company the unexercised, related option, or any portion
thereof, in exchange for an amount equal to the excess of the market value of a
share of Common Stock on the date the SAR is exercised over the Option's
exercise price times the number of shares covered by the surrendered Option, or
portion thereof. The Company did not grant any SARs in 1995 or 1996.
Shares issued as Restricted Shares under the Incentive Plan provide all the
rights of ownership with respect to such shares, including the right to vote the
shares and receive all dividends or other distributions made or paid with
respect to such shares. The shares are restricted in that ownership is dependent
on continued employment with the Company and transferability is limited. These
restrictions lapse upon the completion of a period of time as specified by the
Board of Directors at the time of issuance. Restricted Shares issued under the
plan are recorded at their fair value on the date of issuance with a
corresponding charge to stockholders' equity representing the compensation to be
recognized during the restriction period. The unearned compensation is amortized
as expense on a straight-line basis over the restriction period. In 1995,
131,000 restricted shares were issued at an aggregate value of approximately
$2,161,000. In 1996, 67,000 restricted shares were issued at an aggregate value
of approximately $1,088,000. Amortization of unearned compensation amounted to
$109,000 and $479,000 during 1995 and 1996, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Company's stock option plans at December 31,
1994, 1995 and 1996 and changes during the years then ended is presented in the
tables below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE OPTIONS
-------------------------- -------------------------
WEIGHTED AVG. WEIGHTED AVG.
SHARES EXERCISE PRICE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
------ -------------- ------ --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
January 1, 1994................................. 757,750 $ 8.96
Granted......................................... 308,918 15.96
Exercised....................................... (136,146) 9.15
Purchased by the Company........................ (5,000) 8.00
Canceled........................................ (54,339) 11.16
-------- ------
December 31, 1994............................... 871,183 $11.26 356,730 $ 7.15
Granted......................................... 335,917 17.11
Exercised....................................... (217,162) 7.63
Canceled........................................ (33,146) 15.34
-------- ------
December 31, 1995............................... 956,792 $14.00 403,469 $11.48
Granted......................................... 83,897 14.56
Exercised....................................... (28,350) 16.94
Canceled........................................ (94,567) 17.21
-------- ------
December 31, 1996............................... 917,772 $13.63 744,499 $13.15
======== ======
</TABLE>
49
<PAGE> 50
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE OPTIONS
AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
WTD. AVG.
REMAINING WTD. AVG. WTD. AVG.
RANGE OF CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE EXERCISE
EXERCISE PRICES SHARES LIFE (YEARS) PRICE SHARES PRICE
--------------- ------ ------------ --------- ------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 1.00 to $ 8.00............................ 97,500 0.6 $ 6.00 97,500 $ 6.00
$12.00 to $22.00............................ 820,272 6.3 14.53 646,999 14.23
------- --- ------ ------- ------
917,772 5.7 $13.63 744,499 $13.15
======= === ====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
SFAS No. 123 -- "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation" was issued in
October 1995 and established financial accounting and reporting standards for
stock-based compensation plans. The standard requires a fair value-based method
to determine the compensation costs of such plans. As allowed by the standard,
the Company continued to account for its stock-based employee compensation plans
in accordance with the prior standard under which it recognized an immaterial
amount of compensation expense in 1995 and 1996. Had compensation costs been
determined on the fair value-based accounting method for options granted in 1995
and 1996, pro forma net income and earnings per share would have been $3.5
million and $0.27, respectively, for 1995 and $11.0 million and $0.84,
respectively, for 1996. As compensation costs for options granted prior to
January 1, 1995, were not remeasured for purposes of this pro forma disclosure,
such disclosure may not be representative of such future pro forma disclosures.
The weighted-average estimated fair value of options granted during 1995
and 1996 was $8.42 and $2.42 respectively. The fair value of each option grant
is determined on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted in 1995 and
1996, respectively; risk-free interest rate of 6.32% and 5.77%; expected lives
of 7.91 years and .33 years; expected volatility of 24.87% and 35.35%; and no
dividends for either year.
(12) SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
On October 19, 1995, the Corporation's Board of Directors adopted a
Shareholder Rights Plan. The Board declared a distribution of one right (a
"Right") for each share of Common Stock, which was outstanding on October 19,
1995 (the "Record Date"). Each share of Common Stock issued after the Record
Date will be issued with an attached Right. The Rights will not immediately be
exercisable or detachable from the Common Stock. The Rights will become
exercisable and detachable only following the acquisition by a person or a group
of 15 percent or more of the outstanding Common Stock of U.S. Can Corporation or
following the announcement of a tender or exchange offer for 15 percent or more
of the outstanding Common Stock.
The Rights will, if they become exercisable, permit the holders of the
Rights to purchase a certain amount of preferred stock of the Corporation at a
50 percent discount, or to exchange the Rights for Common Stock, if the Board
permits. Where an acquiring company effects a merger or other control
transaction with the Corporation, the Rights may also entitle the holder to
acquire stock of the acquiring company at a 50 percent discount. If a person or
group acquires 15 percent or more of the Common Stock (or announces a tender or
exchange offer for 15 percent or more of the Common Stock), the acquiring
person's or group's Rights become void. In certain circumstances, the Rights may
be redeemed by the Company at an initial redemption price of $.01 per Right. If
not redeemed, the Rights will expire ten years after the Record Date.
In addition, the Company has adopted certain change of control protection
that, under certain circumstances, would increase compensation and benefits of
certain executive officers.
50
<PAGE> 51
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(13) GEOGRAPHICAL AREA INFORMATION
The following table summarizes certain financial data as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1996, by geographical area. The Company had no foreign
operations prior to its acquisition of USC Europe.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPERATING IDENTIFIABLE
NET SALES INCOME ASSETS
--------- --------- ------------
(000'S OMITTED)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States................................... $728,666 $60,551 $538,389
Europe.......................................... 32,763 975 105,227
-------- ------- --------
Total...................................... $761,429 $61,526 $643,616
======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
(14) SUBSIDIARY GUARANTOR INFORMATION
The 10 1/8% Notes are guaranteed on a full, unconditional, unsecured,
senior subordinated, joint and several basis by each of the Corporation's
Subsidiary Guarantors. As of and through December 31, 1996, U.S. Can, wholly
owned by the Corporation, was the only Subsidiary Guarantor. The Corporation had
no assets or operations separate from its investment in U.S. Can, and there were
no Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries until the acquisition by U.S. Can of USC Europe on
September 11, 1996. Separate financial statements of U.S. Can are not presented
because management of the Company has determined that they are not material to
investors.
The following condensed consolidating financial data illustrates the
composition of the Corporation (the "Parent"), U.S. Can (the "Subsidiary
Guarantor"), and the European Subsidiaries (the "Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries"),
as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996. Investments in subsidiaries are
accounted for by the Parent and the Subsidiary Guarantor under the equity method
for purposes of the supplemental consolidating presentation. Earnings of
subsidiaries are, therefore, reflected in their parent's investment accounts and
earnings.
51
<PAGE> 52
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNITED STATES
CAN
U.S. CAN COMPANY USC EUROPE U.S. CAN
CORPORATION (SUBSIDIARY (NON-GUARANTOR CORPORATION
(PARENT) GUARANTOR) SUBSIDIARIES) ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
----------- ------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
(000'S OMITTED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents............. $ -- $ 628 $ 7,338 $ -- $ 7,966
Accounts receivable................... -- 61,000 25,822 -- 86,822
Inventories........................... -- 98,179 14,964 -- 113,143
Prepaid expenses and other assets..... -- 12,883 2,378 -- 15,261
Prepaid income taxes.................. 696 8,676 -- -- 9,372
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total current assets.......... 696 181,366 50,502 -- 232,564
NET PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT....... -- 269,281 53,833 -- 323,114
INTANGIBLE ASSETS....................... -- 67,206 -- -- 67,206
OTHER ASSETS............................ 7,671 12,169 892 -- 20,732
INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES.............. 364,461 53,232 -- 417,693 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total assets.................. $372,828 $583,254 $105,227 $417,693 $643,616
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current maturities of long-term
debt............................... $ -- $ 11,567 $ 361 $ -- $ 11,928
Accounts payable...................... -- 40,490 19,634 -- 60,124
Other current liabilities............. -- 43,187 11,695 -- 54,882
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total current liabilities..... -- 95,244 31,690 -- 126,934
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
SENIOR DEBT............................. -- 82,978 5,904 -- 88,882
SUBORDINATED DEBT....................... 275,000 -- -- -- 275,000
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES............. 1,340 53,647 1,028 -- 56,015
INTERCOMPANY ADVANCES................... (297) (13,076) 13,373 -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.................... 96,785 364,461 53,232 417,693 96,785
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity........ $372,828 $583,254 $105,227 $417,693 $643,616
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE> 53
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNITED STATES
CAN
U.S. CAN COMPANY USC EUROPE U.S. CAN
CORPORATION (SUBSIDIARY) (NON-GUARANTOR CORPORATION
(PARENT) GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES) ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
----------- ------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
(000'S OMITTED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES.......................... $ -- $728,666 $32,763 $ -- $761,429
COST OF SALES...................... -- 639,272 30,500 -- 669,772
-------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Gross income..................... -- 89,394 2,263 -- 91,657
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES......................... -- 28,843 1,288 -- 30,131
-------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Operating income................. -- 60,551 975 -- 61,526
INTEREST EXPENSE................... -- 28,159 228 -- 28,387
AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED FINANCING
COSTS............................ -- 1,518 -- -- 1,518
OTHER EXPENSES..................... -- 2,009 (63) -- 1,966
EQUITY EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES.... 11,751 511 -- (12,262) --
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES......... -- 12,375 299 -- 12,674
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM, NET............ -- (5,250) -- -- (5,250)
-------- -------- ------- -------- --------
NET INCOME (LOSS).................. $ 11,751 $ 11,751 $ 511 $(12,262) $ 11,751
======== ======== ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
53
<PAGE> 54
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNITED STATES
CAN
U.S. CAN COMPANY USC EUROPE U.S. CAN
CORPORATION (SUBSIDIARY) (NON-GUARANTOR CORPORATION
(PARENT) GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES) ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
----------- ------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
(000'S OMITTED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES....................... $ -- $ 26,245 $ 4,677 $ -- $ 30,922
-------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures............. -- (38,294) (10,336) -- (48,630)
Acquisition of businesses, net of
cash........................... -- (29,655) (51,239) -- (80,894)
Changes in restricted cash....... -- 1,455 -- -- 1,455
Proceeds from sale of property... -- 1,515 -- -- 1,515
Machinery repair parts usage,
net............................ -- 29 (691) -- (662)
-------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
Net cash used in investing
activities................ -- (64,950) (62,266) -- (127,216)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock and
exercise of stock options...... -- (51,082) 51,100 -- 18
Change in intercompany
advances....................... -- (13,373) 13,373 -- --
Net borrowings under the
revolving line of credit and
changes in cash overdrafts..... -- (25,052) -- -- (25,052)
Issuance of 10 1/8% Notes........ -- 275,000 -- -- 275,000
Amounts paid in escrow........... -- (109,728) -- -- (109,728)
Borrowings of other long-term
debt, including capital lease
obligations.................... -- 14,247 -- -- 14,247
Payments of other long-term debt,
including capital lease
obligations.................... -- (41,323) (101) -- (41,424)
Payments of debt refinancing
costs.......................... -- (9,259) -- -- (9,259)
Purchase of treasury stock,
net............................ -- (233) -- -- (233)
-------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided from
financing activities...... -- 39,197 64,372 -- 103,569
-------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES
ON CASH........................ -- -- 555 -- 555
-------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
INCREASE CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS.................... -- 492 7,338 -- 7,830
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
beginning of period............ -- 136 -- -- 136
-------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of
period......................... $ -- $ 628 $ 7,338 $ 0 $ 7,966
======== ========= ======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
54
<PAGE> 55
U.S. CAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of the unaudited interim results of operations
for each of the quarters in 1995 and 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
1995 1996 1995 1996 1995 1996 1995 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(000'S OMITTED, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES.................... $154,061 $163,611 $165,981 $180,596 $154,345 $194,109 $152,098 $223,113
COST OF SALES................ 132,212 142,129 144,757 157,466 142,103 171,150 136,406 199,027
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross Income............... 21,849 21,482 21,224 23,130 12,242 22,959 15,692 24,086
SELLING, GENERAL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.... 6,591 6,850 7,101 7,080 6,898 7,173 6,779 9,028
OVERHEAD REDUCTION
PROVISION(a)............... -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,000 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Income........... 15,258 14,632 14,123 16,050 5,344 15,786 913 15,058
INTEREST EXPENSE ON
BORROWINGS................. 5,802 6,186 6,345 6,334 6,241 6,993 6,125 8,874
AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED
FINANCING COSTS............ 357 426 382 376 396 330 408 386
CONSOLIDATION EXPENSES....... 82 -- 82 -- 81 -- 82 --
OTHER EXPENSES............... 271 492 446 511 499 480 492 463
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR
INCOME TAXES............... 3,624 3,198 2,908 3,752 (593) 3,402 (2,331) 2,322
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before extraordinary
item..................... 5,122 4,330 3,960 5,077 (1,280) 4,581 (3,863) 3,013
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM, NET OF
TAX(b)..................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (5,250)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
NET INCOME (LOSS)............ $ 5,122 $ 4,330 $ 3,960 $ 5,077 $ (1,280) $ 4,581 $ (3,863) $ (2,237)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE.... $ 0.40 $ 0.33 $ 0.31 $ 0.39 $ (0.10) $ 0.35 $ (0.30) $ (0.17)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted average shares and
equivalent shares
outstanding (000's)........ 12,864 13,005 12,856 13,074 12,756 13,120 12,866 13,159
Stock Market Price Range(c)
High....................... $ 23.250 $ 17.375 $ 21.500 $ 18.250 $ 16.000 $ 16.375 $ 14.250 $ 17.250
Low........................ $ 18.750 $ 13.250 $ 14.000 $ 16.125 $ 12.000 $ 14.500 $ 11.000 $ 15.250
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) See Note 7 of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements."
(b) See Note 5 of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements."
(c) The Common Stock of U.S. Can Corporation began trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on April 7, 1995. Prior to that date, the principal market for U.S.
Can Corporation stock was the Nasdaq National Market system.
55
<PAGE> 56
PART II
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Incorporated by reference from the Corporation's 1997 Proxy Statement to be
filed with the Commission.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incorporated by reference from the Corporation's 1997 Proxy Statement to be
filed with the Commission, excluding, however, the Compensation and Management
Development Committee Report and the performance graph contained therein.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Incorporated by reference from the Corporation's 1997 Proxy Statement to be
filed with the Commission.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Incorporated by reference from the Corporation's 1997 Proxy Statement to be
filed with the Commission.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements commence on p. 27.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted as they are inapplicable or not
required, or the required information is included in the
financial statements or in the notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits (Note: Management contracts and compensatory plans or
arrangements are underlined in the following list.)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCORPORATION
EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT (IF APPLICABLE)
------- ----------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
2.1 Alltrista Metal Services Asset Purchase Agreement, dated
April 29, 1996.............................................. x2.1
2.2 CPI Group Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 2,
1996........................................................ #2.1
2.3 USC Europe Acquisition Agreement, dated as of August 1,
1996........................................................ $$2.1
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation....................... @4.3
3.2 By-laws..................................................... @@4.1
4.1 Indenture for 10 1/8% Notes................................. @@@4.2
4.2 Credit Agreement dated April 29, 1994....................... 3 secs. 4.2
4.3 Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 17, 1995........... ++10.5
4.4 Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 25, 1995...... +++4.4
4.5 Amendment to Credit Agreement dated December 29, 1995....... +++4.5
4.6 Amendment No. 5 to Credit Agreement, dated April 1, 1996.... +4.1
4.7 Amendment No. 6 to Credit Agreement, dated April 26, 1996... +4.2
4.8 Amendment No. 7 to Credit Agreement, dated July 24, 1996.... $4.1
4.9 Amendment No. 8 to Credit Agreement, dated September 9,
1996........................................................ @@@4.1
</TABLE>
56
<PAGE> 57
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCORPORATION
EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT (IF APPLICABLE)
------- ----------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
4.10 Amendment No. 9 to Credit Agreement, dated September 30,
1996........................................................ $$$10.1
4.11 Amendment No. 10 to Credit Agreement, dated December 10,
1996........................................................
4.12 Shareholder Rights Agreement................................ ###4.1
10.1 Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Salomon Brothers
Holding Company dated May 2, 1990........................... *10.1
10.2 Letter Agreement with Salomon Brothers dated May 2, 1990.... *10.3
10.3 Sublease Agreement for Commerce, CA plant dated, February
10, 1989.................................................... *10.10
10.4 Lease, as amended, for Weirton, WV plant dated January 1,
1976........................................................ *10.11
10.5 Lease for Burns Harbor, IN plant dated December 5, 1987..... **10.12
10.6 Voghera, Italy lease (English translation)..................
10.7 Lease Agreement, as amended, for Alsip, IL plant dated
August 1, 1980.............................................. **10.15
10.8 Employment Agreement with William J. Smith dated March 26,
1993........................................................ 3 secs. 10.9
10.9 Employment Agreement with Timothy W. Stonich dated March 15,
1993........................................................ 2 secs. 10.10
10.10 The Corporation's Incentive Stock Option Plan............... *10.20
10.11 Lease for Baltimore, MD plant with San Tomas Limited
Partnership dated October 24, 1991.......................... **10.23
10.12 Liability-sharing agreement, as amended, with other
potentially responsible parties with respect to Elkton,
Maryland Superfund site dated August 8, 1990 (including
Exhibit A thereto).......................................... ***10.27
10.13 Sublease for Sparrows Point, MD plant, dated January 10,
1992........................................................ ##10.34
10.14 Administrative Consent Order with the New Jersey Department
of Environmental Protection and Energy (including
Fully-Funded Trust Agreement)............................... xx10.29
10.15 Sublease for Green Bay, WI facility, dated October 31,
1992........................................................ sec.28.2
10.16 Nonqualified Supplemental Benefit Plan for William J. Smith
(including Supplemental Benefit Agreement and Split-Dollar
Insurance Agreement)........................................ xx10.31
10.17 U.S. Can Corporation Stockholders Agreement................. 2 secs. 10.25
10.18 1993 Stock Option Plan...................................... #10.28
10.19 Employment Agreement with Frank J. Galvin dated March 26,
1993........................................................ 2 secs. 10.29
10.20 Lease for Brookfield, OH facility, dated January 8, 1987.... 3 secs. 10.30
10.21 Second amendment to lease for Oak Brook, IL headquarters
dated May 16, 1994.......................................... para.10.29
10.22 Amendment No. 4 to lease for Weirton, WV, dated December 29,
1994........................................................ para.10.30
10.23 Lease Amendment to Burns Harbor, IN, dated September 1,
1994........................................................ para.10.31
10.24 Merthyr Tydfil, Wales Lease.................................
10.25 Lease Amendment to Alsip, IL, dated September 1, 1994....... para.10.33
10.26 Lease for Wheeling, WV, dated November 17, 1988............. para.10.34
10.27 Lease for Fern Park, FL, dated May 16, 1994................. para.10.35
10.28 First amendment to lease for Trenton, NJ, dated January 19,
1995........................................................ para.10.36
10.29 Letter agreement with Salomon Brothers, dated October 11,
1995........................................................ +++10.29
10.30 Employment agreement with Charles E. Foster, dated March 30,
1994........................................................ +++10.30
10.31 Employment agreement with Tony Bonadonna, dated July 1,
1994........................................................ +++10.31
10.32 Amendment No. 1 to North Brunswick lease, dated April 10,
1995........................................................ +++10.32
10.33 Non-Qualified Supplemental 401(k) Plan...................... +++10.33
10.34 Non-Qualified Benefit Replacement Plan...................... +++10.34
10.35 Change in Control Agreement with Frank J. Galvin............ ###10.3
10.36 Change in Control Agreement with Timothy W. Stonich......... ###10.5
10.37 Change in Control Agreement with Charles E. Foster.......... ###10.13
10.38 Change in Control Agreement with Raymond J. Parker.......... ###10.7
10.39 Restricted Stock Agreement with Frank J. Galvin............. ###10.2
</TABLE>
57
<PAGE> 58
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCORPORATION
EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT (IF APPLICABLE)
------- ----------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
10.40 Restricted Stock Agreement with Timothy W. Stonich.......... ###10.4
10.41 Restricted Stock Agreement with Charles E. Foster........... ###10.12
10.42 Restricted Stock Agreement with Raymond J. Parker........... ###10.6
10.43 1995 Equity Incentive Plan.................................. xxx
10.44 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Frank J.
Galvin...................................................... +++10.44
10.45 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Timothy W.
Stonich..................................................... +++10.45
10.46 Agreement regarding Amendment and Restatement of Oak Brook
Lease, dated March 6, 1992.................................. +++10.46
10.47 Columbiana, Ohio lease Agreement, dated January 23, 1990.... +++10.47
10.48 Burns Harbor Lease Amendment No. 1, dated August 18, 1994... +++10.48
10.49 Burns Harbor Lease Amendment No. 3, dated February 1,
1995........................................................ +++10.49
10.50 Addendum No. II to Brookfield, Ohio Lease, dated September
27, 1991.................................................... +++10.50
10.51 First Amendment to Lease for the Baltimore, Maryland plant
with San Tomas Limited Partnership, dated May 8, 1994....... +++10.51
10.52 Lease Agreement for the Columbia Specialty plant in
Baltimore, Maryland, dated May 6, 1994...................... +++10.52
10.53 Warren, Ohio Lease Agreement, dated January 23, 1990........ +++10.53
10.54 Amendment No. 3 to Weirton Lease Agreement, dated October
29, 1993.................................................... +++10.55
10.55 Engagement agreement and related agreement dated April 25,
1996, with Salomon Brothers Inc............................. $10.2
10.56 Newnan, Georgia Lease....................................... @@@10.3
10.57 Alliance, Ohio Lease........................................ @@@10.4
23.1 Consent of Independent Public Accountants...................
27.1 Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR version only)................
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
<TABLE>
<C> <S>
@ Previously filed with Registration Statement on Form S-3 of
the Corporation, on June 1, 1994 (Reg. No. 33-79556).
@@ Previously filed with Form S-8 Registration Statement of the
Corporation, on March 23, 1994 (Reg. No. 33-76742).
@@@ Previously filed with Form 10-Q of the Corporation and U.S.
Can for the quarterly period ended September 29, 1996.
### Previously filed with Form 10-Q of the Corporation and U.S.
Can for the quarterly period ended October 1, 1995.
* Previously filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-1
of U.S. Can filed on November 1, 1991 (Registration No.
33-43734).
** Previously filed with Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of U.S. Can filed on November 19, 1991
(Registration No. 33-43734).
*** Previously filed with Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of U.S. Can filed on December 11, 1991
(Registration No. 33-43734).
x Previously filed with Form 8-K of the Corporation and U.S.
Can filed on May 14, 1996.
+ Previously filed with Form 10-Q of the Corporation and U.S.
Can for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.
# Previously filed with Form 8-K of the Corporation and U.S.
Can filed on August 9, 1996.
## Previously filed with the Form 10-K Annual Report of U.S.
Can for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1991.
xx Previously filed with the Form S-1 Registration Statement of
the Corporation filed on January 6, 1993 (Registration No.
33-56804).
xxx Previously filed with the Corporation's 1995 Proxy
Statement.
sec. Previously filed with the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of U.S.
Can for the Quarterly Period Ended April 3, 1994.
</TABLE>
58
<PAGE> 59
2 secs. Previously filed with the Form 10-K Annual Report of U.S.
Can for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1992.
3 secs. Previously filed with the Form 10-Q Joint Quarterly Report
of the Corporation and U.S. Can for the Quarterly Period
Ended April 3, 1994.
++ Previously filed with Form 10-Q Joint Quarterly Report of
the Corporation and U.S. Can for the quarterly period ended
July 2, 1995.
+++ Previously filed with Form 10-K Joint Annual Report of the
Corporation and U.S. Can for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1995.
para. Previously filed with the Joint Annual Report of the
Corporation and U.S. Can for the Fiscal Year Ended December
31, 1994.
$ Previously filed with Form 10-Q of the Corporation and U.S.
Can for the quarter ended June 30, 1996.
$$ Previously filed with Form 8-K of the Corporation and U.S.
Can filed on September 26, 1996.
$$$ Previously filed with Registration Statement on Form S-4 of
the Corporation and U.S. Can filed on December 11, 1996
(Registration No. 333-17677).
The Company agrees that, upon request, it will furnish a copy of any
instrument with respect to long-term debt less than or equal to 10 percent of
its total consolidated assets.
(b) Corporation and U.S. Can filed a joint report on Form 8-K/A-1 including
financials of the CPI Group and USC Europe, as well as unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financials, on October 2, 1996.
59
<PAGE> 60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 26, 1997.
U.S. CAN CORPORATION
By: /s/ WILLIAM J. SMITH
------------------------------------
William J. Smith
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on
March 26, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
<C> <S>
/s/ WILLIAM J. SMITH Chairman of the Board, President and
- ----------------------------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer
William J. Smith
/s/ TIMOTHY W. STONICH Executive Vice President, Finance,
- ----------------------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Timothy W. Stonich
/s/ JOHN R. MCGOWAN Vice President and Controller
- -----------------------------------------------------
John R. McGowan
/s/ CALVIN W. AURAND, JR. Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Calvin W. Aurand, Jr.
/s/ BENJAMIN F. BAILAR Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Benjamin F. Bailar
/s/ EUGENE B. CONNOLLY, JR. Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Eugene B. Connolly, Jr.
/s/ CARL FERENBACH Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Carl Ferenbach
/s/ RICARDO POMA Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Ricardo Poma
/s/ FRANCISCO A. SOLER Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Francisco A. Soler
/s/ MICHAEL J. ZIMMERMAN Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Zimmerman
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE> 61
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
------- -----------------------
<S> <C>
4.11 Amendment No. 10 to Credit Agreement, dated December 10,
1996
10.6 Voghera, Italy Lease, English translation
10.24 Merthyr Tydfil, Wales Lease
23.1 Consent of Independent Public Accountants
27.1 Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR version only)
</TABLE>
61
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 4.11
AMENDMENT NO. 10
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 10 (this "Amendment"), dated as of December 10,
1996, among United States Can Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"),
the various financial institutions that are or may become parties to the Credit
Agreement described hereinbelow (individually, a "Lender" and collectively, the
"Lenders") and Bank of America Illinois, an Illinois banking corporation, as
agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the "Agent"), is made pursuant to
Section 9.1 of that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of April 29, 1994 (as
amended or modified and in effect on the date hereof, the "Existing Credit
Agreement" and, as amended or otherwise modified in this Amendment, the "Amended
Credit Agreement"; capitalized terms used but not defined herein having the same
respective meanings as in the Amended Credit Agreement), among the Borrower, the
Lenders and the Agent.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Lenders amend the
Existing Credit Agreement in the manner hereinafter appearing; and, subject to
the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Lenders have agreed to so amend
the Existing Credit Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. - AMENDMENT
1.1. Section 6.2(f) of the Existing Credit Agreement is hereby amended
in its entirety to read as follows:
(f) Guaranties. The Borrower shall not, and shall not permit
any of its Subsidiaries to, create or become or be liable, whether
directly or indirectly, with respect to any Guaranty, except that the
Borrower may incur unsecured Guaranties (I) of the obligations of the
Parent under any Approved Parent Debt, (II) for the benefit of any
supplier or vendor to the European Subsidiaries to secure obligations
incurred in the ordinary course of business by the European
Subsidiaries, and (III) for the benefit of General Electric Capital
Corporation to secure obligations incurred by U.K. Can Limited for the
sole purpose of financing the acquisition of real property, plant or
equipment and (IV) unless otherwise permitted in clauses (I), (II) or
(III), (i) for the benefit of the Borrower or any Subsidiary if the
primary obligation is permitted by this Agreement, (ii) for the
benefit of the
<PAGE> 2
Parent or any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Parent, and (iii) for the
benefit of any lessor, supplier or vendor to the Borrower or its
Subsidiaries to secure obligations incurred in the ordinary course of
business by the Borrower or its Subsidiaries (provided that the
aggregate amount of such Guaranties described in clause (iii)
outstanding at any time shall not exceed $5,000,000); provided that
(w) each Guaranty permitted under clauses (I), (III) or (IV) shall be
limited in amount to a stated maximum dollar liability, (x) the
Guaranties permitted under clause (III) shall be limited in amount to
a stated maximum dollar liability of $30,000,000 in the aggregate over
time, (y) each Guaranty permitted under clause (II) shall be limited
in amount to the aggregate purchase price of goods purchased by the
applicable European Subsidiary from such supplier or vendor, and (z)
after the incurrence of each such Guaranty, there would exist no
Default or Event of Default. Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing
sentence to the contrary, the Guaranties permitted under clauses
(IV)(i), (ii) and (iii) above shall in all cases be limited in amount
to a stated maximum dollar liability of $10,000,000 in the aggregate
for the Borrower and the Subsidiaries at any one time.
ARTICLE 2. - CONDITIONS
2.1. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof on
the date (the "Amendment Effective Date") that the Agent shall have received
each of the following, in form and substance satisfactory to it:
(a) counterparts hereof executed by the Borrower and the
Lenders;
(b) a certificate, dated as of the Amendment Effective
Date, of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Borrower as to
resolutions of its Board of Directors then in full force and effect
authorizing the execution and delivery of this Amendment and the
incumbency and signatures of its officers signing this Amendment;
(c) a certificate, dated as of the Amendment Effective
Date, of an authorized officer of the Borrower as to (i) no Default or
Event of Default as of the Amendment Effective Date after giving
effect to this Amendment, (ii) the correctness of the representations
and warranties contained in the Loan Documents in all material
respects as of the Amendment Effective Date after giving effect to
this Amendment, (iii) no amendments or other modifications to the
Borrower's Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws having occurred
since the date that the certified copies of such documents were
delivered by the Borrower pursuant to Sections 4.1(b) and 4.1(c) of
the Existing Credit Agreement, respectively, and (iv) the satisfaction
of each of the conditions precedent contained in this Article II; and
-2-
<PAGE> 3
(d) an opinion of counsel for the Borrower as to this
Amendment and the transactions contemplated hereby, in form and
substance satisfactory to the Agent.
2.2. The Agent agrees to notify the Borrower and the Lenders of
such Amendment Effective Date promptly after such Amendment Effective Date
occurs.
ARTICLE 3. - GENERAL
3.1. To induce the Agent and the Lenders to enter into this
Amendment, the Borrower warrants to the Agent and the Lenders that: (a) the
warranties contained in the Loan Documents, as amended by the Amendment, are
true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof with the same
effect as though made on the date hereof; (b) after giving effect to this
Amendment, no Event of Default or Default exists; (c) this Amendment has been
duly authorized by all necessary corporate proceedings and duly executed and
delivered by the Borrower, and the Amended Credit Agreement and each of the
other Loan Documents are the legal, valid and binding obligations of the
applicable Loan Party, enforceable against such Loan Party in accordance with
their respective terms, except as enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency or other similar laws of general application affecting the
enforcement of creditors' rights or by general principles of equity; (d) no
consent, approval, authorization, order, registration or qualification with any
Governmental Authority or securities exchange is required for, and in the
absence of which would adversely affect, the legal and valid execution and
delivery or performance by the Borrower of this Amendment or the performance by
the Borrower of the Amended Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document to which
it is a party; and (e) the Agent has a first priority lien in the Collateral
subject to no other liens, claims or encumbrances whatsoever other than the
"Permitted Liens" (as defined in the Additional Security Agreement).
3.2. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts
and by the different parties on separate counterparts and each such counterpart
shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together
constitute but one and the same Amendment.
3.3. Except as specifically provided above, the Existing Credit
Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain in full force and effect and
are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. The execution, delivery, and
effectiveness of this Amendment shall not, except as expressly provided herein,
operate as a waiver of any right, power, or remedy of the Agent or any Lender
under the Existing Credit Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, nor
constitute a waiver or modification of any provision of any of the other Loan
Documents, and the Obligations shall continue to be secured in all respects by
the Collateral.
3.4. On and after the Amendment Effective Date, each reference in
the Existing Credit Agreement and related documents to "Credit Agreement," "this
Agreement" or
-3-
<PAGE> 4
words of like import, shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be deemed to
refer to the Amended Credit Agreement.
3.5. The Borrower agrees to pay on demand all reasonable costs and
expenses incurred at any time by the Agent (including the reasonable attorney
fees and expenses for the Agent, including the allocated cost of internal
counsel) in connection with the preparation, negotiation, execution and
administration of this Amendment and all other instruments or documents provided
for herein or delivered or to be delivered hereunder or in connection herewith.
3.6. This Amendment shall be binding upon the Borrower, the Agent,
the Lenders and their respective successors and assigns, and shall inure to the
benefit of the Borrower, the Agent, the Lenders and their respective successors
and assigns as provided in the Amended Credit Agreement.
* * * * *
-4-
<PAGE> 5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to
be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day
and year first above written.
UNITED STATES CAN COMPANY
By: /s/ Peter J. Andres
--------------------------------
Name: Peter J. Andres
--------------------------------
Title: Vice President & Treasurer
--------------------------------
BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS, AS AGENT
By: /s/ David L. Graham
-------------------------------
Name: David L. Graham
-------------------------------
Title: Vice President
-------------------------------
BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS, INDIVIDUALLY
By: /s/ Tracy J. Alfery
-------------------------------
Name: Tracy J. Alfery
-------------------------------
Title: Vice President
-------------------------------
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO
By: /s/ J. Garland Smith
-------------------------------
Name: J. Garland Smith
-------------------------------
Title: Managing Director
-------------------------------
<PAGE> 6
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK
By: /s/ Ronald L. Dell'Artino
-------------------------------
Name: Ronald L. Dell'Artino
-------------------------------
Title: Vice President
-------------------------------
FLEET NATIONAL BANK
By: /s/ Michael A. Pandolfi
-------------------------------
Name: Michael A. Pandolfi
-------------------------------
Title: Vice President
-------------------------------
BANK OF SCOTLAND
By: /s/ Catherine M. Oniffrey
-------------------------------
Name: Catherine M. Oniffrey
-------------------------------
Title: Vice President
-------------------------------
THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY
By: /s/ Robert Dwortz
-------------------------------
Name: Robert Dwortz
-------------------------------
Title: Officer
-------------------------------
SOCIETE GENERALE
By: /s/ Joseph A. Philbin
-------------------------------
Name: Joseph A. Philbin
-------------------------------
Title: Vice President
-------------------------------
<PAGE> 1
18 December 1996 EXHIBIT 10.6
LEASE AGREEMENT
ZONCA S.P.A., a company whose registered office is located at Voghera
(PV), having a share capital of ITL 3,142,320,000, entered in the
Register of Companies of Voghera under No. 1194, Fiscal Code and VAT Code
No. 00186380184, represented by Mr. Luigi Zonca, in his capacity as
Chairman and Managing Director of the Company (hereinafter referred to as
"Lessor" or "Zonca")
AND
U.S.C. EUROPE ITALIA S.R.L., a company whose registered office is located
at Largo Donegani 2, Milan, having a share capital of ITL 20,000,000,
entered in the Register of Companies of Milan under No. 786360/1996,
Fiscal Code and VAT Code 11907070152, represented by Mr. Nicola Asti, in
his capacity as Attorney in Fact (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessee"
or "USC")
W I T N E S S E T H :
A. Zonca is the owner of an industrial building and appurtenances
thereto, located at Via Lomellina No. 145, Voghera (PV), as better
identified in the map and description which are attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" (the term "Building Unit" is inclusive of the building
which is marked in red color in the map attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and the surrounding areas which serve the building itself and
which are marked in red color in the aforesaid map);
1
<PAGE> 2
B. Zonca desires to lease to USC, and USC desires to lease from Zonca,
the Building Unit on all the terms and conditions set out
hereinafter.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AND COVENANT AS FOLLOWS:
1. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS
The recitals hereof and exhibits hereto are an integrating and
substantive part of this Agreement.
2. SCOPE AND TERM OF LEASE - RENEWAL
2.01 Zonca hereby leases, as a unit and not by measurement, the Building
Unit to USC, and USC hereby accepts to so lease the Building Unit
from Zonca, for a term of 6 (six) years commencing on 15 January 1997
("Effective Date") and ending on 14 January 2003 ("Expiration Date").
2.02 Zonca hereby waives, now for then, its right not to tacitly renew
this Agreement pursuant to the combined provisions of articles 28 and
29 of Law No. 392 of 27 July 1978; therefore, at the Expiration Date,
this Agreement will tacitly be renewed for a further 9 (nine) year
period, unless USC has notified Zonca of its intention not to renew
it by a registered letter, return receipt requested, which shall have
been mailed at least 6 (month)s prior to the Expiration Date.
2.03 In the event that this Agreement is automatically renewed in
accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.02 above, USC will be
entitled to withdraw therefrom for any reason and at any time,
pursuant to art. 27, seventh paragraph, of Law No. 392 of 27 July
1978 by giving Zonca a
2
<PAGE> 3
written prior notice of at least 6 (six) months by registered letter,
return receipt requested.
2.04 At the end of the lease, the Building Unit shall be surrended to
Zonca on or before the date specified by USC in its notice pursuant
to and for the purposes of paragraphs 2.02 and 2.03 above, which
respectively apply according to whether USC has decided not to renew
this Agreement or to withdraw therefrom. USC shall pay to Zonca, by
way of liquidated damages, the sum of ITL 2,000,000 (two million
Italian Lire) for each day of delay in surrending the Building Unit
after the date set out in USC's notice.
3. RENT-PAYMENT-ADJUSTMENT
3.01 The annual rent payable by USC shall be the sum of ITL 380,000,000
(three hundred eighty million Italian Lire) plus VAT as applicable,
and shall be paid at the Lessor's domicile in 12 equal monthly
installments payable in advance, each expiring on the last working
day of the month preceding the reference month upon receipt of
Zonca's regular invoice.
3.02 In partial derogation of the foregoing provisions and in
consideration to the relevant provisions containted in article 4
hereof, USC and Zonca acknowledge and agree that, in the period
between the Effective Date and the date in which the Building Unit
will be completely and definitively delivered to USC pursuant to
paragraph 4.01 hereof, the above rent shall be proportionally reduced
in order to take into consideration the effective portion of the
Building Unit delivered by Zonca to USC in such period as provided
for in paragraph 4.02 hereof.
3
<PAGE> 4
3.03 Effective from the beginning of the second year of lease and subject
to a prior written notice to be sent by Zonca to the Lessee by
registered letter return receipt requested, the annual rent, as
determined in paragraph 3.01 above, may be increased by an amount
equal to 75% of the changes, as assessed by ISTAT, occurred in the
cost of living for families of laborers and clerical workers in the
preceding year, and so forth on a yearly basis throughout the term of
this Agreement.
3.04 Without prejudice to the provisions of article 6 below, the amount
of rent as agreed in paragraph 3.01 above, does not include the
expenses deriving from the use of the Building Unit and from the
operation of USC's business activities which shall be paid by USC
directly to the suppliers of such services. Zonca hereby acknowledges
that no compensation shall be due by USC as reimbursement of
overheads and accessory charges.
3.05 Without prejudice to the provisions set out in paragraph 3.04
hereof, Zonca undertakes on demand of USC to supply to the latter any
services which might be necessary or useful for the carrying out of
USC's activity in the Building Unit. In such event USC shall
reimburse to Zonca, upon receipt of a regular invoice in which the
services rendered and the relevant period shall be specified, solely
the costs incurred by Zonca for providing such services, being in
fact waived any further compensation howsoever relating to the same.
4. LESSOR'S OBLIGATIONS
4.01 Considering that the Building Unit is presently occupied by certain
plants and machinery belonging to Zonca, Zonca agrees to remove all
4
<PAGE> 5
these plants and machinery, at its own care and expenses, within 20
days from the Effective Date and, therefore, to deliver the Building
Unit by that date duly vacated and ready to be used by USC as USC may
require. In the event that the above removal is not completed within
20 days from the Effective Date, for any reasons whatsoever,
including an event beyond the parties' control, Zonca shall pay USC,
by way of liquidated damages, the sum of ITL 2,000,000 for each day
of delay.
4.02 In partial derogation of the provisions set out in paragraph 4.01
above, Zonca undertakes to deliver to USC on or before the Effective
Date a portion of approximately 1,200 square meters of the Building
Unit in the area marked in orange color in the map attached as
Exhibit "A", duly vacated and ready to be used as the Lessee may
require.
In the event in which Zonca does not fulfill for any reasons
whatsoever the obligations set out in this paragraph, it shall pay
USC, by way of liquidated damages, the sum of Lire 2,000,000 for each
day of delay in the delivery of such portion of the Building Unit.
4.03 Within 20 days from the Effective Date, Zonca, at its own expenses
and according to such criteria as will be decided by Zonca itself
without USC's right to raise objections thereto, and as will be
determined by an engineer appointed by Zonca, but in any event in a
workmanlike manner and in compliance with the relevant Permits (as
defined hereinafter), shall construct an asphalted and open air
parking area for 30 cars (the "Parking") in the area marked in rose
color in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; for the construction
of the Parking, Zonca shall at its own care and expenses obtain any
and all necessary or requisite permits and/or approvals and/or
authorizations and/or concessions from the
5
<PAGE> 6
competent Authorities (the "Permits"). In addition, Zonca shall
construct the Parking in full compliance with all building, zoning,
environmental and safety regulations as well as any other applicable
provisions of law, without prejudice to the Lessee's and third
party's rights, and shall also indemnify and hold the Lessee harmless
from any nuisance, claim, liability, penalty or damage that may arise
from the execution of the construction works for the Parking or
from any works connected therewith. In the event that the Parking is
not completed, for any reasons whatsoever including an event beyond
the parties' control, within 20 days from the Effective Date, Zonca
shall pay USC, by way of liquidated damages, the sum of ITL 500,000
(five hundred thousand Italian Lire) for each day of delay. Without
prejudice to the above, Zonca, as from the Effective Date and until
the Parking has been completed, shall make available to USC, at no
additional cost or expenses, space for ten cars in the parking area
marked in blue color in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
5. ALTERATIONS TO THE BUILDING UNIT AND SYSTEMS
5.01 Zonca hereby authorizes USC to make in the Building Unit any and all
works as may be necessary or appropriate to replace the present
electrical control board and install a new fire-fighting system, and
to make thereto any other alterations, transformations or additions
of non-structural nature which were to become necessary or
appropriate in relation to the above.
5.02 In the event that USC deems it necessary or appropriate to make any
other alterations, transformations or additions to make the Building
Unit fit for USC's operating requirements, Zonca's prior consent
shall be
6
<PAGE> 7
required, consent which, in no event, shall be unreasonably withheld
or refused. Provided that all costs associated with such works shall
be borne by USC in full, the parties hereby reciprocally acknowledge
that, without prejudice to Zonca's right to demand USC to restore the
Building Unit into its original condition (provided, however, that
such demand shall be made by Zonca in its notice informing USC of its
consent to the execution of the relevant works) and without prejudice
to USC's right to remove from the Building Unit any improvement made
by USC to the Building Unit during the lease, any improvements made
by USC to the Building Unit will become an integral part thereof at
the end of the lease and that USC cannot claim any compensation
therefor.
5.03 For the purposes of paragraphs 5.01 and 5.02 above, the Lessor shall
promptly sign any and all applications to the competent authorities,
as may be required or appropriate to obtain the relevant permits
and/or approvals and/or authorizations and/or concessions and
facilitate the course thereof.
6. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEMS AND BUILDING UNIT.
6.01 The routine maintenance of the Building Unit and systems installed
therein shall be made by the Lessee at its own care and expenses,
whereas the non-routine maintenance of the Building Unit and systems
installed therein, such as, by way of mere example, roof repairs and
heating system repairs, shall be made by the Lessor at its own care
and expenses.
7
<PAGE> 8
6.02 Without prejudice to the parties' respective responsibility for the
above maintenance works, the parties agree that, whenever urgent
maintenance and/or repair works are required, either party, subject
to requesting the other party which is responsible therefor to make
such urgent works, is entitled to make them if the other party has
failed to promptly do so and to be reimbursed for the costs incurred
in connection therewith within ten days of the notice of completion
thereof, without prejudice to its right to claim damages and to any
other remedy provided by the law or by this agreement in any event
of default.
7. ENLARGEMENT OF BUILDING UNIT
7.01 Upon request by USC and as supplementation of the existing Building
Unit, Zonca shall at its own expenses enlarge the Building Unit by
approximately 1,000 (thousand) square meters in the area marked in
brown color in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (Enlargement
Works"). Zonca shall prepare, at its own care and expenses, the
relevant building projects and technical specifications as will be
necessary or appropriate to execute the Enlargement Works, provided,
however, that the said works shall be made in a masterly manner, in
compliance with the relevant Permits (as defined above) and using
comparable building materials and techniques to those employed in the
construction of the Building Unit. In respect of the Enlargement
Works to be executed, Zonca shall at its own care and expenses obtain
any and all necessary and requisite permits and/or approvals and/or
authorizations and/or concessions from the competent Authorities (the
"Permits"). In addition, Zonca shall execute the Enlargement Works in
full compliance with all building, zoning, environmental and safety
regulations and any other applicable provisions of law. In this
respect, Zonca shall relieve USC
8
<PAGE> 9
from any liabilities arising from the execution of the Enlargement
Works and shall indemnify and hold USC harmless from and against any
claim for damages made against USC by any third party, including but
not limited to the professionals who have been entrusted with the
study and design of the Enlargement Works, the site superintendent,
the construction company, its employees and/or representatives, the
competent Public Authorities, relating to and/or arising from the
Enlargement Works, including any fines inflicted by the competent
Public Authorities.
7.02 Once the Enlargement Works have been completed and the new space so
obtained has been made available to USC for USC's intended use, the
annual rent referred to in paragraph 3.01 above shall be increased -
on the basis of ITL 90,500 (ninety thousand five hundred Italian
Lire) per square meter - to be adjusted according to the variations
quoted by ISTAT, as described in paragraph 3.03 above, in the period
between the first anniversary of the Effective Date and the date on
which such new space is made available to USC.
8. INDEMNIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS
Zonca shall indemnify, defend and hold USC harmless from and against
any and all claims raised by third parties, including, but not
limited to, public agencies and administrative authorities, as well
as any costs or liabilities incurred by USC, howsoever deriving from
or relating to (i) non-conformity of the Building Unit or of the
activities carried out therein prior to the Effective Date under
environmental regulations and (ii) any obligations to make
restoration works in the Building Unit or in the surrounding land
under the applicable provisions of law or further to
9
<PAGE> 10
an order issued by any competent authority, provided, however, that
such claims, costs or liabilities stem from activities which were
carried out in the Building Unit prior to the Effective Date or which
are imputable to Zonca or other lessees.
9. RIGHT OF PASSAGE
Considering that the Building Unit has not an independent access from
Via Lomellina, Zonca, for the entire duration of this Agreement,
warrants that USC and any other subject who for whatsoever reason
will visit the Building Unit, will be authorized to use, at no
additional cost or expense, the passage through the land pertaining
to the other building unit next to the Building Unit as better
identified in yellow in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the
"Passage"), provided that, however, no vehicles belonging to USC or
to any other subject who will visit the Building Unit are authorized
to park in such Passage, save for temporary maneuver reasons of the
above vehicles. However the parties hereby agree that the access to
the Passage through the gate identified with number "2" in the map
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" shall be permitted exclusively from
7.45 to 19.00 each day, excluding Saturday, Sunday and other public
holidays. Furthermore the parties agree that the access to the
Passage through this gate shall be regulated by a custodian employed
by Zonca who will open the gate upon demand of USC and/or of any
other subject who will visit the Building Unit. Finally, the accesso
to the Passage through the gate identified with number "1" in the map
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" shall be permitted to USC and any
other subject who who will visit the Building Unit without any
limitation whatsoever.
10
<PAGE> 11
10. GUARANTEE-DEPOSIT
As security for any damages caused to the Building Unit during the
term of this Agreement for which USC will be liable towards Zonca,
USC undertakes to deliver to Zonca on or before 31 December 1996 a
bank guarantee payable upon demand for an amount equal to three
twelfth of the annual rent payable hereunder, as due from time to
time, and, therefore, initially for the sum of ITL 95,000,000
(ninety-five million Italian Lire). USC agrees to procure that this
bank guarantee be adjusted by the issuer on the basis of the rent
payable from time to time by increasing the guaranteed amount
accordingly. The Lessor shall authorize the release of the above bank
guarantee within ten (10) days of the termination or expiration of
this Agreement and, for this purpose, the Lessor shall make all
necessary inspections to determine whether any damages were caused by
USC to the Building Unit within the above period of time. Such
guarantee shall have a one year duration and shall be automatically
renewed year by year for the entire duration of the lease. In the
event in which, for any reason whatsoever, such guarantee is revoked
or not renewed by the granting bank, USC undertakes to promptly
replace such guarantee with another guarantee of the same amount or,
at its sole discretion, to set up a deposit equal to three twelfths
of the rent in favor of Zonca.
11. GUARANTEE IN FAVOR OF ZONCA
As security for due performance by USC of its obligation to timely
pay all rents due, USC (i) delivers to Zonca a letter of patronage
issued by US Can Corporation confirming that USC is a company
controlled by US Can Corporation and containing US Can Corporation's
undertaking to procure that USC at all times owns such financial
means as will be
11
<PAGE> 12
necessary and sufficient to perform USC's obligation to pay the rents
agreed hereunder and (ii) undertakes to deliver on or before 31
December 1996 a bank guarantee for an amount equal to the annual rent
as payable from time to time and, therefore, initially for an amount
of ITL 380,000,000 (three hundred eighty million Italian Lire). USC
agrees to procure that this bank guarantee be adjusted by the issuer
on the basis of the rent payable from time to time by increasing the
guaranteed amount accordingly. The purpose of this bank guarantee is
solely that of securing that the rent agreed in article 3 above will
be fully paid by USC to Zonca at the due dates. This bank guarantee
shall remain in force for one year after the Effective Date and shall
be automatically renewed for successive terms of one year each until
the Expiration Date, unless either party revokes it by giving to the
other a written notice thereof at least 30 days prior to the
forthcoming expiration date. It is in any event agreed that all
costs and expenses for the issue of the above guarantee shall be
fully borne by Zonca which, accordingly, shall promptly reimburse USC
for all expenses advanced by USC to the Bank. Similarly, such
guarantee shall also be delivered by USC to Zonca in the event that
this Agreement is renewed in accordance with the provisions of
paragraph 2.02 above.
12. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
Zonca grants USC hereunder a first refusal right for the lease of an
industrial building owned by Zonca as better identified in violet
color in the map which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". This right
shall be exercised by USC, under penalty of forfeiture, within 30
(thirty) days of receipt of a notice from Zonca informing of Zonca's
intention to lease such other building; the said notice shall also
contain detailed
12
<PAGE> 13
information on the essential terms of the proposed lease agreement,
including the rent payable thereunder, the term thereof and any other
details as may be useful for USC to decide whether or not to exercise
the first refusal right granted to USC hereunder.
13. COMPANY SPLIT-UP
The parties hereby reciprocally acknowledge that, considering that
Zonca intends to split-up its corporate organization pursuant to art.
2504-septies of the Civil Code, after which the Building Unit leased
hereunder will be included in the assets of either of the new legal
persons which will result thereof, this Agreement shall be assigned
to either of such new legal persons and, thereafter, will be binding
on and will inure to the benefit of such new legal person, provided,
however, that the other legal person which will result of such split
up operation shall nevertheless be jointly and severally liable for
any and all obligations of the Lessor hereunder.
14. OUTDOOR SIGNS
The Lessor hereby authorizes the Lessee to install any signs,
including electric signs, outside or on the Building Unit.
15. REGISTRATION TAX
This Agreement is subject to VAT and, accordingly, pursuant to
article 40 of Presidential Decree No. 131 of 26 April 1986, the
registration tax is due at fixed rate.
The tax payable for the registration of this agreement, as well as
any expenses associated with any future renewal thereof, shall be
borne by the Lessee and the Lessor in equal shares.
13
<PAGE> 14
16. NOTICES
Any notice relating to this Agreement shall be given by fax or
registered letter, return receipt requested, to the addresses of the
parties as respectively set out below, or to such other address as
either party may notify to the other in writing with at least 15 days
notice, and shall be deemed as received at the moment of the
transmission, if sent by fax, or at the moment of the receipt, if
sent by registered letter:
If to USC:
Via Lomellina 145
Voghera (PV)
Fax n.:__________
att.: Plant Manager
with copy to:
United States Can Company
900 Commerce Drive,
Oak Brook, IL, 60521
Fax n.: 001 630 573 0715
att.: Legal Department
and copy to:
Studio Legale Fondato da Francesco Carnelutti
Corso Matteotti 10
20121 Milano
att.: Nicola Asti
If to Zonca:
14
<PAGE> 15
via Lomellina 145
Voghera (PV)
Fax n.: __________
att.: Luigi Zonca
17. GOVERNING LAW - ARBITRATION CLAUSE
This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the
laws of Italy. Any disputes between the parties relating to this
Agreement shall be finally determined by a board of three
arbitrators. The Board of Arbitrators shall be formed upon request of
either party: the requesting party shall notify the other party of
its request for arbitration by registered letter, return receipt
requested, and shall appoint therein its arbitrator and request the
other party to appoint its own arbitrator within 20 (twenty) days.
In the event that the other party fails to do so, the requesting
party may request the Presiding Judge of the Tribunal of Milan to
appoint the arbitration for the defaulting party.
The arbitrators so appointed shall by mutual agreement appoint the
third arbitrator, who shall act as Chairman of the Board, within 15
(fifteen) days from their designation.
In the event that no agreement is reached by the two arbitrators
designated by the parties on the third arbitrator to be appointed,
the said arbitrator will be appointed, upon request of the more
diligent party, by the Presiding Judge of the Court of Milan, who,
similarly, shall also designate, if necessary, an arbitrator in
replacement of any arbitrator previously appointed.
15
<PAGE> 16
The Arbitrators shall sit in Milan and shall decide according to the law.
Their award shall be delivered within 90 (ninety) days (unless an extension of
this period is authorized by the parties or their attorneys). Any matter which
is not expressly covered herein shall be governed by articles 806 and following
of the Code of Civil Procedure.
ZONCA S.P.A. U.S.C. EUROPE ITALIA S.R.L.
/s/ Luigi Zonca /s/ Nicola Asti
- --------------- ---------------
In my capacity as an officer of the registrant, I hereby represent, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that the foregoing is a fair and
acccurate English translation of the registrant's Voghera, Italy lease
/s/ Peter J. Andres
-------------------
Peter J. Andres
Vice President & Treasurer
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT-10.24
DATED 27 November 1996
(1) BLUEBIRD TOYS PLC
(2) U.K. CAN LIMITED
---------------------------------------------------
LEASE
relating to Dragon Parc Industrial
Estate Merthyr Tydfil
---------------------------------------------------
[BOODLE HATFIELD LETTERHEAD]
<PAGE> 2
THIS LEASE made the twenty-seventh day of 27 November One thousand nine
hundred and ninety-six BETWEEN BLUEBIRD TOYS PLC (Company Registration No.
1485995) whose registered office is at The Mulberrys Kembrey Park Swindon SN2
6YP (hereinafter called "the Landlord" which expression shall where the context
so admits include the person or persons for the time being entitled to
reversion immediately expectant on the term hereby created) of the one part and
U.K. CAN LIMITED (Company Registration No. 3153735) whose registered office is
at Adelaide House London Bridge London EC4R 9HA (hereinafter called "the
Tenant" which expression shall where the context so admits include its
successors in title) of the other part WITNESSES as follows:
1. IN consideration of the sum of Five million four hundred and sixty five
thousand pounds (L.5,465,000) exclusive of Value Added Tax (the receipt whereof
the Landlord hereby acknowledges) and of the rent and covenants on the part of
the Tenant hereinafter contained the Landlord HEREBY DEMISES to the Tenant ALL
THAT land and building forming part of the Dragon Parc Industrial Estate
Merthyr Tydfil in the County Borough of Merthyr Tydfil as the same is comprised
in title number WA376826 registered at H M Land Registry and shown for the
purpose of identification edged red on the plan attached hereto TO HOLD the
same unto the Tenant for the term of NINE HUNDRED AND NINETY NINE YEARS from
the 29th day of September 1996 subject to and (as the case may be) with the
benefit of the various rights reservations and other matters affecting the
demised premises as the same are referred to in the Property and Charges
Registers of the said
1
<PAGE> 3
title number WA376826 YIELDING AND PAYING therefor during the said term in
advance on the 29th day of September in every year during the said term the
annual rent of Ten pounds (L.10.00)
2. THE Tenant HEREBY COVENANTS with the Landlord as follows:-
2.1 To pay the rent hereby reserved and made payable at the times and in
manner aforesaid
2.2 At the Tenant's own expense to execute all works provide and maintain
all arrangements upon or in respect of the demised premises or the use to which
the same are being put that are required in order to comply with the
requirements of any statute (already or in the future to be passed) or any
Government Department local authority other public or competent authority
or Court of competent jurisdiction regardless of whether such requirements are
imposed upon the lessor the lessee or the occupier
2.3 Not to do in or near the demised premises any act or thing by reason of
which the Landlord may under any statute incur have imposed upon it or become
liable to pay any penalty damages compensation costs charges or expenses
2.4 Without prejudice to the generality of the obligations contained in
Clauses 2.2 and 2.3 to comply in all respect with the provisions of any
statutes and any other obligations imposed by law or by any by laws applicable
to the demised premises or in regard to carrying on the trade or business for
the time being carried on upon the demised premises
2.5 Within 28 days of any assignment or any transmission or any other
devolution relating to the demised premises to
2
<PAGE> 4
produce for registration with the Landlord's solicitors a certified copy of
such assignment and to pay the Landlord's solicitors' reasonable charges for
registration of every such document such charges not being less than L.25
2.6 To be responsible for and to keep the Landlord fully indemnified against
2.6.1 all damages losses costs expenses actions demands proceedings claims and
liabilities made against or suffered or incurred by the Landlord arising
directly or indirectly out of any act or omission or negligence of the Tenant
or any persons at the demised premises expressly on impliedly with the Tenant's
authority or any breach or non-observance by the Tenant of the covenants
conditions or other provisions of this lease or any of the matters to which the
demise is subject
2.6.2 any tax or imposition which becomes payable either during the said term
or after its ending by reason of any act or default of the Tenant or any person
deriving title under the Tenant or their respective agents servants and
licensees
2.6.3 all actions claims and liabilities for any breach of the covenants on
the part of the transferee contained in the Transfer of the demised premises
dated 8th August 1996 and made between Bluebird Toys (UK) Limited (1) and the
Landlord (2) in respect of the obligations arising under a Transfer of the
demised premises dated 3rd April 1987 made between Hoover Plc and Avana Group
Plc ("the Hoover Transfer") to pay one half of the reasonable cost of
maintenance and repair and (when necessary) replacement of the boundary fence
marked A-B on the plan attached to the Hoover Transfer
3
<PAGE> 5
2.7 At the expiration of the said term to yield up the demised premises in
accordance with the terms of this lease
3. THE Landlord HEREBY COVENANTS with the Tenant that the Tenant paying the
rent hereby reserved and made payable and performing and observing the several
covenants conditions and agreements herein contained and on the Tenant's part
to be performed and observed shall and may peaceably and quietly hold and enjoy
the demised premises during the said term without any lawful interruption or
disturbance from or by the Landlord or any person claiming under or in trust
for the Landlord
4. PROVIDED ALWAYS and it is hereby agreed that if the said rent hereby
reserved or any part thereof shall be in arrear and unpaid for 21 days next
after the same shall have become due then it shall be lawful for the Landlord
(but by court action only and not physical re-entry) to re-enter the demised
premises and to repossess and enjoy the same as if this lease had not been made
without prejudice to any right of action or remedy in respect of any antecedent
breach of any of the covenants by the lessee hereinbefore contained
IN WITNESS whereof this deed has been duly executed by the parties hereto as a
deed the day and year first before written
THE COMMON SEAL of BLUEBIRD )
(SEAL) TOYS PLC was hereunto )
affixed in the presence of )
/s/ David Sandilands
Director
/s/ Graham Knibbf
Secretary
(Executed as a Deed by U.K.
----
(CAN LIMITED by the signature
-----------
(of two directors
Director
/s/ Timothy W. Stonich
Director
/s/ Lawrence T. Messina
4
<PAGE> 6
[H.M LAND REGISTRY MAP TITLE NUMBER WA 376826]
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement File Nos.33-76742 and 333-23647 on Form S-8, and
33-79556 on Form S-3.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH> 7,966
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 97,717
<ALLOWANCES> 10,895
<INVENTORY> 113,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 232,564
<PP&E> 476,274
<DEPRECIATION> 153,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 643,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 126,934
<BONDS> 363,882
130
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 96,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 643,616
<SALES> 761,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 761,429
<CGS> 669,772
<TOTAL-COSTS> 699,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 3,034
<LOSS-PROVISION> 430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 28,387
<INCOME-PRETAX> 29,675
<INCOME-TAX> 12,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 17,001
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 5,250
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 11,751
<EPS-PRIMARY> $0.90
<EPS-DILUTED> $0.90
</TABLE>
