Chapman and Cutler
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
January 7, 1994
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004
Attn: Filing Desk, Stop 1-4
Re:Insured Municipals Income Trust, 152nd Insured Multi-Series
(File No. 33-50595) (CIK #896294)
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the requirements of Rule 497(b) of the General
Rules and Regulations under the Securities Act of 1933, there is filed a
form of Prospectus to be used in connection with the public offering of
the securities covered by the subject Registration Statement in the exact
form in which such Prospectus will be used.
Very truly yours,
CHAPMAN AND CUTLER
By Mark J. Kneedy
MJK/ch
Enclosures
Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold
nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration
statement becomes effective. This Prospectus shall not constitute an
offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be
any sale of these securities in any State in which such offer, solicitation
or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the
securities laws of any State.
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED JANUARY 6, 1994
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
January 6, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST, 152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES
IM-IT 314
IM-IT 72nd Limited Maturity
Michigan IM-IT 112
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9
Pennsylvania IM-IT 181
In the opinion of counsel, interest to the Fund and to Unitholders, with
certain exceptions, is excludable under existing law from gross income for
Federal income taxes. In addition, the interest income of each State Trust is,
in the opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state and local
taxes, when held by residents of the state where the issuers of Bonds in such
Trust are located. Capital gains, if any, are subject to Federal tax.
THE FUND. The objectives of the Fund are Federal and, in the case of a
State Trust, state tax-exempt income and conservation of capital through an
investment in a diversified, insured portfolio of tax-exempt bonds. The Fund
consists of five underlying separate unit investment trusts designated as
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 314 (the "IM-IT"), Insured Municipals
Income Trust, 72nd Limited Maturity Series (the "IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust"), Michigan Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 112 (the "Michigan
IM-IT Trust"), New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9 (the
"New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust") and Pennsylvania
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 181 (the "Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust").
The various trusts are collectively referred to herein as the "Trusts", the
Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trusts are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "State
Trusts", while the IM-IT, IM-IT Limited Maturity, Michigan IM-IT, New York
IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts are
sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "Insured Trusts" and the New
York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust is sometimes referred to
herein as the "State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust". Each Trust
initially consists of delivery statements relating to contracts to purchase
securities and, thereafter, will consist of such securities as may continue to
be held (the "Bonds" or "Securities"). Such Securities are interest-bearing
obligations issued by or on behalf of municipalities and other governmental
authorities, the interest on which is, in the opinion of recognized bond
counsel to the issuing governmental authority, exempt from all Federal income
taxes under the existing law. In addition, the interest income of each State
Trust is, in the opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state
and local taxes, when held by residents of the state where the issuers of
Bonds in such Trust are located.
"AAA" RATING FOR THE INSURED TRUSTS. Insurance guaranteeing the payments
of principal and interest, when due, on the Securities in the portfolio of
each Insured Trust has been obtained from a municipal bond insurance company
either by such Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds involved, by a prior owner
of the Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Bonds in an
Insured Trust. See "Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the
Insured Trusts" on page 20. Insurance obtained by an Insured Trust applies
only while Bonds are retained in such Trust while insurance obtained on
Preinsured Bonds is effective so long as such Bonds are outstanding. The
Trustee, upon the sale of a Bond insured under an insurance policy obtained by
an Insured Trust, has a right to obtain from the insurer involved permanent
insurance for such Bond upon the payment of a single predetermined insurance
premium and any expenses related thereto from the proceeds of the sale of such
Bond. INSURANCE RELATES ONLY TO THE BONDS IN A TRUST AND NOT TO THE UNITS
OFFERED HEREBY OR TO THE MARKET VALUE THEREOF. As a result of such insurance,
the Units of each Insured Trust have received a rating of "AAA" by Standard &
Poor's Corporation. Standard & Poor's Corporation has indicated that this
rating is not a recommendation to buy, hold or sell Units nor does it take
into account the extent to which expenses of each Insured Trust or sales by
each Insured Trust of Bonds for less than the purchase price paid by such
Trust will reduce payments to Unitholders of the interest and principal
required to be paid on such Bonds. See "Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on
the Bonds in the Insured Trusts". No representation is made as to any
insurer's ability to meet its commitments.
PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE. The Public Offering Price of the Units of each
Trust during the initial offering period is equal to the aggregate offering
price of the Securities in such Trust's portfolio and cash, if any, in the
Principal Account held or owned by such Trust Fund plus the applicable sales
charge plus Purchased Interest and accrued interest, if any. After the initial
public offering period, the secondary market Public Offering Price of each
Trust will be equal to the aggregate bid price of the Securities in such Trust
and cash, if any, in the Principal Account held or owned by such Trust Fund
plus the applicable sales charge plus Purchased Interest and accrued interest,
if any. Sales charges for the Trusts in the initial market, expressed both as
a percentage of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest) and
as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are set
forth in footnote (2) under "Summary of Essential Financial Information". For
sales charges in the secondary market, see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering". If the Securities in each Trust were available for direct purchase
by investors, the purchase price of the Securities would not include the sales
charge included in the Public Offering Price of the Units. During the initial
offering period, the sales charge is reduced on a graduated scale for sales
involving at least 100 Units. If Units were available for purchase at the
opening of business on the Date of Deposit (except for the IM-IT and the
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit)
, the Public Offering Price per Unit would have been that amount set forth in
the "Summary of Essential Financial Information" for each Trust. See
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering".
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS
A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
<PAGE>
2 Introduction
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN AND ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN. The annual
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return to Unitholders at the
opening of business (except for the IM-IT and the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as
of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit) on January 6, 1994, were as
set forth under "Per Unit Information" for each Trust. The methods of
calculating Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are set
forth in the footnotes to the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust.
OBJECTIVES OF THE FUND. The objectives of the Fund are income exempt from
Federal income tax and, in the case of a State Trust, Federal and state income
tax (if any) and conservation of capital through an investment in diversified
portfolios of Federal and state tax-exempt obligations. There is, of course,
no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its objectives. The Fund may be an
appropriate investment vehicle for investors who desire to participate in a
portfolio of tax-exempt fixed income securities with greater diversification
than they might be able to acquire individually. In addition, securities of
the type deposited in the Fund are often not available in small amounts.
DISTRIBUTIONS. Purchasers of Units will receive distributions on a
monthly basis. See "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the
Trusts". Record dates will be the first day of each month. Distributions will
be made on the fifteenth day of the month subsequent to the respective record
dates.
MARKET FOR UNITS. Although not obligated to do so, the Sponsor, Van
Kampen Merritt Inc., intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may,
maintain a secondary market for the Units at prices based upon the aggregate
bid prices of the Securities in the respective Trusts plus Purchased Interest;
however, during the initial offering period such prices will be based upon the
aggregate offering prices of the Securities plus Purchased Interest. If such a
market is not maintained and no other over-the-counter market is available, a
Unitholder will be able to dispose of his Units only through redemption at
prices based upon the bid prices of the underlying Securities plus Purchased
Interest (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Redemption of Units"
and "Unitholder Explanations-- Public Offering--Market for Units").
REINVESTMENT OPTION. Unitholders have the opportunity to have their
distributions reinvested into an open-end, management investment company as
described herein. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering-- Reinvestment
Option".
<PAGE>
Summary of Essential Financial Information 3
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST,
152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
AT THE OPENING OF BUSINESS ON THE DATE OF DEPOSIT: JANUARY 6, 1994
(EXCEPT FOR THE IM-IT AND THE PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST AS OF 8:00 A.M. CENTRAL
TIME ON THE DATE OF DEPOSIT)
SPONSOR: VAN KAMPEN MERRITT INC.
EVALUATOR: AMERICAN PORTFOLIO EVALUATION SERVICES
(A DIVISION OF A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SPONSOR)
TRUSTEE: THE BANK OF NEW YORK
<CAPTION>
IM-IT LIMITED MICHIGAN
GENERAL INFORMATION IM-IT MATURITY TRUST IM-IT TRUST
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust.................. $ 9,870,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 3,485,000
Number of Units...................................................... 10,104 5,000 3,554
Fractional Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit.................. 1/10,104 1/5,000 1/3,554
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit <F1>............. $ 976.84 $ 1,000.00 $ 980.59
Public Offering Price:
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities in Portfolio.............. $ 9,543,505 $ 4,879,884 $ 3,351,153
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities per Unit.................. $ 944.53 $ 975.98 $ 942.92
Sales Charge <F2>................................................ $ 48.66 $ 43.85 $ 48.59
Purchased Interest <F3>.......................................... $ 68,821 $ 41,408 $ 30,185
Purchased Interest per Unit <F3>................................. $ 6.81 $ 8.28 $ 8.49
Public Offering Price per Unit <F3>.............................. $ 1,000.00 $ 1,028.11 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit, including Purchased Interest <F3>......... $ 944.44 $ 976.99 $ 944.09
Secondary Market Repurchase Price per Unit, including Purchased
Interest <F3>...................................................... $ 951.34 $ 984.26 $ 951.41
Excess of Public Offering Price per Unit Over Redemption Price per
Unit............................................................... $ 55.56 $ 51.12 $ 55.91
Excess of Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price per Unit Over Redemption
Price per Unit..................................................... $ 6.90 $ 7.27 $ 7.32
Minimum Value of the Trust under which Trust Agreement may be
terminated......................................................... $ 1,974,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 697,000
Minimum Principal Distribution.......... $1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date................... January 13, 1994
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee...... Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee....... $0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds <F4>
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made
as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of
Units or receipt by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
<FN>
<F1>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a
number of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000
principal amount of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand,
in determining the number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT
Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity
and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, has elected not to follow this format
but rather to provide that number of Units which will establish as close
as possible as of the Date of Deposit a Public Offering Price per Unit of
$1,000. For IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand,
each unit represents $1,000 principal amount of underlying securities in
such Trust on the Date of Deposit.
<F2>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price per Unit (excluding Purchased Interest) and in parenthesis
as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are as
follows: an IM-IT or a State Trust (other than a State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust) - 4.9% (5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust - 4.3% (4.493%); an IM-IT Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); an
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust or a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity
Trust - 3.0% (3.093%).
<F3>Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid interest that has accrued on
the Bonds from the later of the last payment date on the Bonds or the date
of issuance thereof through the First Settlement Date and is included in
the calculation of the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest will be
distributed to Unitholders as Units are redeemed or Securities mature or
are called. Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First
Settlement Date will pay accrued interest from such date to the date of
settlement (normally five business days after order) less distributions
from the Interest Account subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For
purchases settling on the First Settlement Date, no accrued interest will
be added to the Public Offering Price other than the Purchased Interest
already included therein. After the initial offering period, the Sponsor's
Repurchase Price per Unit will be determined as described under the
caption "Public Offering-- Market for Units."
<F4>Such fee is based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities in
each Trust on the Date of Deposit for the first year and as of the close
of business on January 1 for each year thereafter.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
4 Summary of Essential Financial Information
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST,
152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
AT THE OPENING OF BUSINESS ON THE DATE OF DEPOSIT: JANUARY 6, 1994
(EXCEPT FOR THE IM-IT AND THE PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST AS OF 8:00 A.M. CENTRAL
TIME ON THE DATE OF DEPOSIT)
SPONSOR: VAN KAMPEN MERRITT INC.
EVALUATOR: AMERICAN PORTFOLIO EVALUATION SERVICES
(A DIVISION OF A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SPONSOR)
TRUSTEE: THE BANK OF NEW YORK
<CAPTION>
NEW YORK
IM-IT
INTERMEDIATE
LADDERED PENNSYLVANIA
GENERAL INFORMATION MATURITY TRUST IM-IT TRUST
<S> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust................................... $ 3,075,000 $ 4,425,000
Number of Units....................................................................... 3,075 4,559
Fractional Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit................................... 1/3,075 1/4,559
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit <F1>.............................. $ 1,000.00 $ 970.61
Public Offering Price:
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities in Portfolio............................... $ 3,056,203 $ 4,304,016
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities per Unit................................... $ 993.89 $ 944.07
Sales Charge <F2>................................................................. $ 30.73 $ 48.64
Purchased Interest <F3>........................................................... $ 15,231 $ 33,234
Purchased Interest per Unit <F3>.................................................. $ 4.95 $ 7.29
Public Offering Price per Unit <F3>............................................... $ 1,029.57 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit, including Purchased Interest <F3>.......................... $ 990.96 $ 944.33
Secondary Market Repurchase Price per Unit, including Purchased Interest <F3>......... $ 998.84 $ 951.36
Excess of Public Offering Price per Unit Over Redemption Price per Unit............... $ 38.61 $ 55.67
Excess of Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price per Unit Over Redemption Price per Unit.. $ 7.88 $ 7.03
Minimum Value of the Trust under which Trust Agreement may be terminated.............. $ 615,000 $ 885,000
Minimum Principal Distribution.......... $1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date................... January 13, 1994
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee...... Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee....... $0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds <F4>
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made
as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of
Units or receipt by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
<FN>
<F1>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a
number of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000
principal amount of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand,
in determining the number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT
Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity
and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, has elected not to follow this format
but rather to provide that number of Units which will establish as close
as possible as of the Date of Deposit a Public Offering Price per Unit of
$1,000. For IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand,
each unit represents $1,000 principal amount of underlying securities in
such Trust on the Date of Deposit.
<F2>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price per Unit (excluding Purchased Interest) and in parenthesis
as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are as
follows: an IM-IT or a State Trust (other than a State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust) - 4.9% (5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust - 4.3% (4.493%); an IM-IT Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); an
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust or a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity
Trust - 3.0% (3.093%).
<F3>Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid interest that has accrued on
the Bonds from the later of the last payment date on the Bonds or the date
of issuance thereof through the First Settlement Date and is included in
the calculation of the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest will be
distributed to Unitholders as Units are redeemed or Securities mature or
are called. Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First
Settlement Date will pay accrued interest from such date to the date of
settlement (normally five business days after order) less distributions
from the Interest Account subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For
purchases settling on the First Settlement Date, no accrued interest will
be added to the Public Offering Price other than the Purchased Interest
already included therein. After the initial offering period, the Sponsor's
Repurchase Price per Unit will be determined as described under the
caption "Public Offering-- Market for Units."
<F4>Such fee is based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities in
each Trust on the Date of Deposit for the first year and as of the close
of business on January 1 for each year thereafter.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 5
SETTLEMENT OF BONDS IN THE TRUSTS
THE FUND. Insured Municipals Income Trust, 152nd Insured Multi-Series
(the "Fund"), was created under the laws of the State of New York pursuant to
a Trust Indenture and Agreement (the "Trust Agreement"), dated the Date of
Deposit, among Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as Sponsor, American Portfolio
Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory
Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
The Fund consists of five separate portfolios of delivery statements
relating to contracts to purchase interest-bearing obligations issued by or on
behalf of states and territories of the United States, and political
subdivisions and authorities thereof, the interest on which is, in the opinion
of recognized bond counsel to the issuing authorities, excludable from gross
income for Federal income tax under existing law. All issuers of Securities in
a State Trust are located in the State for which such Trust is named or in
United States territories or possessions and their public authorities;
consequently, in the opinion of recognized bond counsel to such State issuers,
the related interest earned on such Securities is exempt to the extent
indicated from state and local taxes of such State. With the exception of the
New York and Pennsylvania Trusts, Units of such Trusts may be purchased only
by residents of the State for which such Trust is named. Units of a New York
Trust may be purchased by residents of New York, Connecticut, Florida and
Massachusetts. Units of a Pennsylvania Trust may be purchased by residents of
Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, New York, Ohio and West
Virginia. Offerees in the States of Indiana, Virginia and Washington may
purchase Units of the IM-IT and IM-IT Limited Maturity Trusts only. On the
Date of Deposit, the Sponsor deposited with the Trustee the aggregate
principal amount of Securities in each Trust as indicated under "General
Information-- Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust" in the
"Summary of Essential Financial Information". Such Securities consist of
delivery statements relating to contracts for the purchase of certain
interest-bearing obligations and cash, cash equivalents and/or irrevocable
letters of credit issued by a financial institution in the amount required for
such purchases. Thereafter, the Trustee, in exchange for the Securities so
deposited, delivered to the Sponsor the certificates evidencing the ownership
of the number of Units in each Trust as indicated under "Summary of Essential
Financial Information." Unless otherwise terminated as provided herein, the
Trust Agreement for any IM-IT or State Trust (other than a State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust) will terminate at the end of the calendar year prior
to the fiftieth anniversary of its execution and the Trust Agreement for any
IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, IM-IT Intermediate Trust, State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust or IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust will terminate at
the end of the calendar year prior to the twentieth anniversary of its
execution.
The portfolio of any IM-IT or State Trust (other than a State
Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) consists of Bonds maturing approximately
15 to 40 years from the Date of Deposit. The approximate range of maturities
from the Date of Deposit for Bonds in any IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, IM-IT
Intermediate Trust, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust and IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust is 12 to 15 years, 5 to 15 years, 5 to 10 years and 3 to 7
years, respectively. The dollar-weighted average maturity of the Bonds in any
IM-IT Intermediate Trust, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust and IM-IT
Short Intermediate Trust is less than or equal to 10 years, 10 years and 5
years, respectively.
The portfolio of any State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust is
structured so that approximately 20% of the Bonds contained in such portfolio
will mature each year, commencing in approximately the fifth year of the
Trust, entitling each Unitholder to a return of principal. This return of
principal may offer Unitholders the opportunity to respond to changing
economic conditions and to specific financial needs that may arise between the
fifth and tenth years of a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust.
However, the flexibility provided by the return of principal may at the same
time eliminate a Unitholder's ability to reinvest the amount returned at a
rate as high as the implicit yield on the obligations which matured.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be "zero coupon" bonds.
See footnote (6) in "Notes to Portfolios". Zero coupon bonds are purchased at
a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to receive a final
payment at the maturity of the bond and does not receive any periodic interest
payments. The effect of owning deep discount bonds which do not make current
interest payments (such as the zero coupon bonds) is that a
<PAGE>
6 Unitholder Explanations
fixed yield is earned not only on the original investment but also, in effect,
on all discount earned during the life of such obligation. This implicit
reinvestment of earnings at the same rate eliminates the risk of being unable
to reinvest the income on such obligation at a rate as high as the implicit
yield on the discount obligation, but at the same time eliminates the holder's
ability to reinvest at higher rates in the future. For this reason, zero
coupon bonds are subject to substantially greater price fluctuations during
periods of changing market interest rates than are securities of comparable
quality which pay interest.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may have been purchased on
a "when, as and if issued" or "delayed delivery" basis. See footnote (5) in
"Notes to Portfolios". The delivery of any such Securities may be delayed or
may not occur. Interest on these Securities begins accruing to the benefit of
Unitholders on their respective dates of delivery. To the extent any
Securities are actually delivered to the Fund after their respective expected
dates of delivery, Unitholders who purchase their Units prior to the date such
Securities are actually delivered to the Trustee would be required to adjust
their tax basis in their Units for a portion of the interest accruing on such
Securities during the interval between their purchase of Units and the actual
delivery of such Securities. As a result of any such adjustment, the Estimated
Current Returns during the first year would be slightly lower than those
stated herein which would be the returns after the first year, assuming the
portfolio of a Trust and estimated annual expenses other than that of the
Trustee (which may be reduced in the first year only) do not vary from that
set forth under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust. Holders of
the Units will be "at risk" with respect to all Securities in the portfolios
including "when, as and if issued" and "delayed delivery" Securities (i.e.,
may derive either gain or loss from fluctuations in the evaluation of such
Securities) from the date they commit for Units. For a discussion of the
Sponsor's obligations in the event of the failure of any contract for the
purchase of any of the Securities and limited right to substitute other
tax-exempt bonds to replace any failed contract, see "Replacement Bonds"
below.
Each Unit initially offered represents the fractional undivided interest
in the principal and net income of a Trust indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information". To the extent that any Units are redeemed by
the Trustee, the fractional undivided interest in a Trust represented by each
unredeemed Unit will increase, although the actual interest in such Trust
represented by such fraction will remain unchanged. Units will remain
outstanding until redeemed upon tender to the Trustee by Unitholders, which
may include the Sponsor or the Underwriters, or until the termination of the
Trust Agreement.
OBJECTIVES AND SECURITIES SELECTION. The objectives of the Fund are
income exempt from Federal income taxation and, in the case of a State Trust,
Federal and state (to the extent indicated) income taxation and conservation
of capital through an investment in diversified portfolios of Federal and
state (to the extent indicated) tax-exempt obligations. A State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust has additional objectives of providing protection
against changes in interest rates and investment flexibility through an
investment in a laddered portfolio of intermediate-term interest-bearing
obligations with maturities ranging from approximately 5 to 10 years in which
roughly 20% of the obligations contained in such portfolio will mature each
year commencing in approximately the fifth year of the Trust. There is, of
course, no guarantee that the Trusts will achieve their respective objectives.
The Fund may be an appropriate investment vehicle for investors who desire to
participate in a portfolio of tax-exempt fixed income securities with greater
diversification than they might be able to acquire individually. In addition,
securities of the type deposited in the Fund are often not available in small
amounts.
Insurance guaranteeing the timely payment, when due, of all principal and
interest on the Bonds in each Insured Trust has been obtained by such Trust
from either AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity"), Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty" or "FGIC") or a combination
thereof (collectively, the "Portfolio Insurers"), or by the issuer of such
Bonds, by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit
of such Bonds in such Trust from (1) AMBAC Indemnity or one of its
subsidiaries, American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation ("AMBAC") or MGIC
Indemnity Corporation ("MGIC Indemnity"), (2) Financial Guaranty, (3)
Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation ("MBIA"), (4) Bond Investors
Guaranty Insurance Company ("BIG"), (5) National Union Fire Insurance Company
of Pittsburgh, PA. ("National Union"), (6) Capital Guaranty Insurance Company
("Capital Guaranty"), (7) Capital Markets Assurance Corporation ("CapMAC")
and/or (8) Financial Security Assurance Inc. ("Financial Security" or "FSA")
(collectively, the "Preinsured Bond Insurers") (see
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 7
"Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts").
Insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is effective only while the Bonds thus
insured are held in such Trust. The Trustee has the right to acquire permanent
insurance from a Portfolio Insurer with respect to each Bond insured by the
respective Portfolio Insurer under a Trust portfolio insurance policy.
Insurance relating to Bonds insured by the issuer, by a prior owner of such
Bonds or by the Sponsor is effective so long as such Bonds are outstanding.
Bonds insured under a policy of insurance obtained by the issuer, by a prior
owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor from one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers
(the "Preinsured Bonds") are not additionally insured by an Insured Trust. No
representation is made as to any insurer's ability to meet its commitments.
Neither the Public Offering Price nor any evaluation of Units for
purposes of repurchases or redemptions reflects any element of value for the
insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, unless Bonds are in default in
payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such default. See
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price". On the other hand,
the value, if any, of Preinsured Bond insurance is reflected and included in
the market value of such Bonds.
In order for bonds to be eligible for insurance, they must have credit
characteristics which would qualify them for at least the Standard & Poor's
Corporation rating of "BBB-" or at least the Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
rating of "Baa", which in brief represent the lowest ratings for securities of
investment grade (see "Other Matters--Description of Securities Ratings").
Insurance is not a substitute for the basic credit of an issuer, but
supplements the existing credit and provides additional security therefor. If
an issue is accepted for insurance, a non-cancellable policy for the prompt
payment of interest and principal on the bonds, when due, is issued by the
insurer. Any premium or premiums relating to Preinsured Bond insurance is paid
by the issuer, by a prior owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor and a monthly
premium is paid by an Insured Trust for the portfolio insurance, if any,
obtained by such Trust. The Trustee has the right to obtain permanent
insurance from a Portfolio Insurer in connection with the sale of a Bond
insured under the insurance policy obtained from the respective Portfolio
Insurer by an Insured Trust upon the payment of a single predetermined
insurance premium from the proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any
Bond in an Insured Trust is eligible to be sold on an insured basis. All Bonds
insured by the Portfolio Insurers and the Preinsured Bond Insurers receive a
"AAA" rating by Standard & Poor's Corporation. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
In selecting Securities for the Trusts the following facts, among others,
were considered by the Sponsor: (a) either the Standard & Poor's Corporation
rating of the Securities was in no case less than "BBB-" in the case of the
Insured Trusts, or the Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating of the
Securities was in no case less than "Baa" in the case of the Insured Trusts,
including provisional or conditional ratings, respectively, or, if not rated,
the Securities had, in the opinion of the Sponsor, credit characteristics
sufficiently similar to the credit characteristics of interest-bearing
tax-exempt obligations that were so rated as to be acceptable for acquisition
by the Fund (see "Other Matters-- Description of Securities Ratings"), (b) the
prices of the Securities relative to other bonds of comparable quality and
maturity, (c) the diversification of Securities as to purpose of issue and
location of issuer and (d) with respect to the Insured Trusts, the
availability and cost of insurance for the prompt payment of principal and
interest, when due, on the Securities. Subsequent to the Date of Deposit, a
Security may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below the minimum
required as of the Date of Deposit. Neither event requires elimination of such
Security from the portfolio of a Trust but may be considered in the Sponsor's
determination as to whether or not to direct the Trustee to dispose of the
Security (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Portfolio Administration").
To the best knowledge of the Sponsor, there is no litigation pending as
of the Date of Deposit in respect of any Securities which might reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect upon the Fund or any of the Trusts.
At any time after the Date of Deposit, litigation may be initiated on a
variety of grounds with respect to Securities in the Fund. Such litigation,
as, for example, suits challenging the issuance of pollution control revenue
bonds under environmental protection statutes, may affect the validity of such
Securities or the tax-free nature of the interest thereon. While the outcome
of litigation of such nature can never be entirely predicted, the Fund has
received or will receive opinions of bond counsel to the issuing authorities
of each Security on the date of issuance to the effect that such Securities
have been validly issued and that the interest thereon is exempt from Federal
income tax. In addition,
<PAGE>
8 Unitholder Explanations
other factors may arise from time to time which potentially may impair the
ability of issuers to meet obligations undertaken with respect to the
Securities.
PORTFOLIO CONCENTRATIONS. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts
may be general obligations of a governmental entity that are backed by the
taxing power of such entity. In view of this an investment in such a Trust
should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers
and the risks which such an investment may entail. All other Bonds in the
Trusts are revenue bonds payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. General
obligation bonds are secured by the issuer's pledge of its faith, credit and
taxing power for the payment of principal and interest. Revenue bonds, on the
other hand, are payable only from the revenues derived from a particular
facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a
special excise tax or other specific revenue source. There are, of course,
variations in the security of the different Bonds in the Fund, both within a
particular classification and between classifications, depending on numerous
factors. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which
derive their payments from mortgage loans. Certain of such housing bonds may
be FHA insured or may be single family mortgage revenue bonds issued for the
purpose of acquiring from originating financial institutions notes secured by
mortgages on residences located within the issuer's boundaries and owned by
persons of low or moderate income. In view of this an investment in such a
Trust should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such
issuers and the risks which such an investment may entail. Mortgage loans are
generally partially or completely prepaid prior to their final maturities as a
result of events such as sale of the mortgaged premises, default, condemnation
or casualty loss. Because these bonds are subject to extraordinary mandatory
redemption in whole or in part from such prepayments of mortgage loans, a
substantial portion of such bonds will probably be redeemed prior to their
scheduled maturities or even prior to their ordinary call dates. Extraordinary
mandatory redemption without premium could also result from the failure of the
originating financial institutions to make mortgage loans in sufficient
amounts within a specified time period. Additionally, unusually high rates of
default on the underlying mortgage loans may reduce revenues available for the
payment of principal of or interest on such mortgage revenue bonds. These
bonds were issued under Section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code, which
Section contains certain requirements relating to the use of the proceeds of
such bonds in order for the interest on such bonds to retain its tax-exempt
status. In each case the issuer of the bonds has covenanted to comply with
applicable requirements and bond counsel to such issuer has issued an opinion
that the interest on the bonds is exempt from Federal income tax under
existing laws and regulations. Certain issuers of housing bonds have
considered various ways to redeem bonds they have issued prior to the stated
first redemption dates for such bonds. In connection with the housing bonds
held by the Fund, the Sponsor at the Date of Deposit is not aware that any of
the respective issuers of such Bonds are actively considering the redemption
of such Bonds prior to their respective stated initial call dates. See
"General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be health care revenue
bonds. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Ratings of bonds issued for health care facilities
are often based on feasibility studies that contain projections of occupancy
levels, revenues and expenses. A facility's gross receipts and net income
available for debt service may be affected by future events and conditions
including, among other things, demand for services and the ability of the
facility to provide the services required, physicians' confidence in the
facility, management capabilities, competition with other health care
facilities, efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates,
legislation establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, the cost and
possible unavailability of malpractice insurance, the funding of Medicare,
Medicaid and other similar third party payor programs, government regulation
and the termination or restriction of governmental financial assistance,
including that associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third
party payor programs. Pursuant to recent Federal legislation, Medicare
reimbursements are currently calculated on a prospective basis utilizing a
single nationwide schedule of rates. Prior to such legislation Medicare
reimbursements were based on the actual costs incurred by the health facility.
The current legislation may adversely affect reimbursements to hospitals and
other facilities for services provided under the Medicare program. Such
adverse changes also may adversely affect the ratings of Securities held in
the portfolios of
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 9
the Fund; however, because of the insurance obtained by each of the Insured
Trusts, the "AAA" rating of the Units of each of the Insured Trusts would not
be affected. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of
public utility issuers, including those selling wholesale and retail electric
power and gas. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. General problems of such issuers would
include the difficulty in financing large construction programs in an
inflationary period, the limitations on operations and increased costs and
delays attributable to environmental considerations, the difficulty of the
capital market in absorbing utility debt, the difficulty in obtaining fuel at
reasonable prices and the effect of energy conservation. All of such issuers
have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees. In
addition, Federal, state and municipal governmental authorities may from time
to time review existing, and impose additional, regulations governing the
licensing, construction and operation of nuclear power plants, which may
adversely affect the ability of the issuers of certain of the Bonds in the
portfolio to make payments of principal and/or interest on such Bonds. See
"General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of
issuers whose revenues are derived from the sale of water and/or sewerage
services. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Such Bonds are generally payable from user fees. The
problems of such issuers include the ability to obtain timely and adequate
rate increases, population decline resulting in decreased user fees, the
difficulty of financing large construction programs, the limitations on
operations and increased costs and delays attributable to environmental
considerations, the increasing difficulty of obtaining or discovering new
supplies of fresh water, the effect of conservation programs and the impact of
"no-growth" zoning ordinances. All of such issuers have been experiencing
certain of these problems in varying degrees. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be industrial revenue
bonds ("IRBs"). In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. IRBs have generally been issued under
bond resolutions pursuant to which the revenues and receipts payable under the
arrangements with the operator of a particular project have been assigned and
pledged to purchasers. In some cases, a mortgage on the underlying project may
have been granted as security for the IRBs. Regardless of the structure,
payment of IRBs is solely dependent upon the creditworthiness of the corporate
operator of the project or corporate guarantor. Corporate operators or
guarantors may be affected by many factors which may have an adverse impact on
the credit quality of the particular company or industry. These include
cyclicality of revenues and earnings, regulatory and environmental
restrictions, litigation resulting from accidents or environmentally-caused
illnesses, extensive competition and financial deterioration resulting from a
corporate restructuring pursuant to a leveraged buy-out, takeover or
otherwise. Such a restructuring may result in the operator of a project
becoming highly leveraged which may impact on such operator's creditworthiness
which in turn would have an adverse impact on the rating and/or market value
of such Bonds. Further, the possibility of such a restructuring may have an
adverse impact on the market for and consequently the value of such Bonds,
even though no actual takeover or other action is ever contemplated or
effected. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations that are
secured by lease payments of a governmental entity (hereinafter called "lease
obligations"). Lease obligations are often in the form of certificates of
participation. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. Although the lease obligations do not
constitute general obligations of the municipality for which the
municipality's taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is ordinarily
backed by the municipality's covenant to appropriate for and make the payments
due under the lease obligation. However, certain lease obligations contain
"non-appropriation" clauses which provide that the municipality has no
obligation to make lease payments in future years unless money is appropriated
for such purpose on a yearly basis. A governmental entity that enters into
such a lease agreement cannot obligate future governments to appropriate for
and make lease payments but covenants to take such action as is necessary to
include any lease payments due in its budgets and to make the appropriations
therefor. A governmental entity's failure to appropriate for
<PAGE>
10 Unitholder Explanations
and to make payments under its lease obligation could result in insufficient
funds available for payment of the obligations secured thereby. Although
"non-appropriation" lease obligations are secured by the leased property,
disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure might prove difficult.
See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of
issuers which are, or which govern the operation of, schools, colleges and
universities and whose revenues are derived mainly from ad valorem taxes or
for higher education systems, from tuition, dormitory revenues, grants and
endowments. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with
an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which
such an investment may entail. General problems relating to school bonds
include litigation contesting the State constitutionality of financing public
education in part from ad valorem taxes, thereby creating a disparity in
educational funds available to schools in wealthy areas and schools in poor
areas. Litigation or legislation on this issue may affect the sources of funds
available for the payment of school bonds in the Trusts. General problems
relating to college and university obligations include the prospect of a
declining percentage of the population consisting of "college" age
individuals, possible inability to raise tuitions and fees sufficiently to
cover increased operating costs, the uncertainty of continued receipt of
Federal grants and state funding, and government legislation or regulations
which may adversely affect the revenues or costs of such issuers. All of such
issuers have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees.
See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which
are payable from and secured by revenues derived from the ownership and
operation of facilities such as airports, bridges, turnpikes, port
authorities, convention centers and arenas. In view of this an investment in
such a Trust should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of
such issuers and the risks which such an investment may entail. The major
portion of an airport's gross operating income is generally derived from fees
received from signatory airlines pursuant to use agreements which consist of
annual payments for leases, occupancy of certain terminal space and service
fees. Airport operating income may therefore be affected by the ability of the
airlines to meet their obligations under the use agreements. The air transport
industry is experiencing significant variations in earnings and traffic, due
to increased competition, excess capacity, increased costs, deregulation,
traffic constraints and other factors, and several airlines are experiencing
severe financial difficulties. The Sponsor cannot predict what effect these
industry conditions may have on airport revenues which are dependent for
payment on the financial condition of the airlines and their usage of the
particular airport facility. Similarly, payment on Bonds related to other
facilities is dependent on revenues from the projects, such as user fees from
ports, tolls on turnpikes and bridges and rents from buildings. Therefore,
payment may be adversely affected by reduction in revenues due to such factors
as increased cost of maintenance, decreased use of a facility, lower cost of
alternative modes of transportation, scarcity of fuel and reduction or loss of
rents. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which
are payable from and secured by revenues derived from the operation of
resource recovery facilities. In view of this an investment in such a Trust
should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers
and the risks which such an investment may entail. Resource recovery
facilities are designed to process solid waste, generate steam and convert
steam to electricity. Resource recovery bonds may be subject to extraordinary
optional redemption at par upon the occurrence of certain circumstances,
including but not limited to: destruction or condemnation of a project;
contracts relating to a project becoming void, unenforceable or impossible to
perform; changes in the economic availability of raw materials, operating
supplies or facilities necessary for the operation of a project or
technological or other unavoidable changes adversely affecting the operation
of a project; administrative or judicial actions which render contracts
relating to the projects void, unenforceable or impossible to perform; or
impose unreasonable burdens or excessive liabilities. The Sponsor cannot
predict the causes or likelihood of the redemption of resource recovery bonds
in such a Trust prior to the stated maturity of the Bonds. See "General" for
each Trust.
REPLACEMENT BONDS. Because certain of the Securities in the Fund may from
time to time under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will mature in
accordance with their terms and because the proceeds from such events will be
distributed to Unitholders and will not be reinvested, no assurance can be
given that any Trust will retain for any length of time its present size and
composition. Neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee shall be liable in any
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 11
way for any default, failure or defect in any Security. In the event of a
failure to deliver any Security that has been purchased for the Fund under a
contract, including those Securities purchased on a "when, as and if issued"
basis ("Failed Bonds"), the Sponsor is authorized under the Trust Agreement to
direct the Trustee to acquire other bonds ("Replacement Bonds") to make up the
original corpus of the Fund.
The Replacement Bonds must be purchased within 20 days after delivery of
the notice of the failed contract and the purchase price (exclusive of accrued
interest) may not exceed the amount of funds reserved for the purchase of the
Failed Bonds. The Replacement Bonds (i) must be tax-exempt bonds issued by
states or territories of the United States or political subdivisions thereof
and, in the case of replacement of bonds in a State Trust, shall have the
benefit of an exemption from state taxation of interest to an extent equal to
or greater than that of the bonds they replace, (ii) must have a fixed
maturity date of at least 10 years in the case of an IM-IT or a State Trust
(other than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) or, in the case of
an IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered
Maturity or IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust, must have a fixed maturity date
within the range set forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds
in the Trusts--The Fund", (iii) must be purchased at a price that results in a
yield to maturity and in a current return, in each case as of the Date of
Deposit, at least equal to that of the Failed Bonds, (iv) shall not be "when,
as and if issued" bonds, (v) must be rated "BBB-" or better in the case of the
Insured Trusts by Standard & Poor's Corporation or "Baa" or better in the case
of the Insured Trusts by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and (vi) with respect
to each Insured Trust, must be insured by one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers
or be eligible for (and when acquired be insured under) the insurance obtained
by such Insured Trust. Whenever a Replacement Bond has been acquired for the
Fund, the Trustee shall, within five days thereafter, notify all Unitholders
of the affected Trust of the acquisition of the Replacement Bond and shall, on
the next monthly distribution date which is more than 30 days thereafter, make
a pro rata distribution of the amount, if any, by which the cost to the
affected Trust of the Failed Bond exceeded the cost of the Replacement Bond
plus accrued interest. Once the original corpus of a Trust is acquired, the
Trustee will have no power to vary the investment of the Trust; i.e., the
Trust will have no managerial power to take advantage of market variation to
improve a Unitholder's investment.
If the right of limited substitution described in the preceding paragraph
shall not be utilized to acquire Replacement Bonds in the event of a failed
contract, the Sponsor will refund the sales charge attributable to such Failed
Bonds to all Unitholders of the affected Trust and distribute the principal,
Purchased Interest and accrued interest (at the coupon rate of such Failed
Bonds to the date the Failed Bonds are removed from the Fund) attributable to
such Failed Bonds not more than 30 days after such removal or such earlier
time as the Trustee in its sole discretion deems to be in the interest of the
Unitholders. All such interest paid to a Unitholder which accrued after the
expected date of settlement for purchase of his Units will be paid by the
Sponsor and accordingly will not be treated as tax-exempt income. In the event
a Replacement Bond should not be acquired by the Fund, the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit for the affected Trust would be reduced and
the Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return thereon might be
lowered. In addition, Unitholders should be aware that they may not be able at
the time of receipt of such principal to reinvest such proceeds in other
securities at a yield equal to or in excess of the yield which such proceeds
were earning to Unitholders in the affected Trust.
BOND REDEMPTIONS. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be
subject to redemption prior to their stated maturity date pursuant to sinking
fund provisions, call provisions or extraordinary optional or mandatory
redemption provisions or otherwise. A sinking fund is a reserve fund
accumulated over a period of time for retirement of debt. A callable debt
obligation is one which is subject to redemption or refunding prior to
maturity at the option of the issuer. A refunding is a method by which a debt
obligation is redeemed, at or before maturity, by the proceeds of a new debt
obligation. In general, call provisions are more likely to be exercised when
the offering side valuation is at a premium over par than when it is at a
discount from par. The exercise of redemption or call provisions will (except
to the extent the proceeds of the called Bonds are used to pay for Unit
redemptions) result in the distribution of principal and may result in a
reduction in the amount of subsequent interest distributions; it may also
affect the current return on Units of the Trust involved. Each Trust portfolio
contains a listing of the sinking fund and call provisions, if any, with
respect to each of the debt obligations. Extraordinary optional redemptions
and mandatory redemptions result from the happening of certain events.
Generally, events that may permit the extraordinary optional redemption of
Bonds or
<PAGE>
12 Unitholder Explanations
may require the mandatory redemption of Bonds include, among others: a final
determination that the interest on the Bonds is taxable; the substantial
damage or destruction by fire or other casualty of the project for which the
proceeds of the Bonds were used; an exercise by a local, state or Federal
governmental unit of its power of eminent domain to take all or substantially
all of the project for which the proceeds of the Bonds were used; changes in
the economic availability of raw materials, operating supplies or facilities
or technological or other changes which render the operation of the project
for which the proceeds of the Bonds were used uneconomic; changes in law or an
administrative or judicial decree which renders the performance of the
agreement under which the proceeds of the Bonds were made available to finance
the project impossible or which creates unreasonable burdens or which imposes
excessive liabilities, such as taxes, not imposed on the date the Bonds are
issued on the issuer of the Bonds or the user of the proceeds of the Bonds; an
administrative or judicial decree which requires the cessation of a
substantial part of the operations of the project financed with the proceeds
of the Bonds; an overestimate of the costs of the project to be financed with
the proceeds of the Bonds resulting in excess proceeds of the Bonds which may
be applied to redeem Bonds; or an underestimate of a source of funds securing
the Bonds resulting in excess funds which may be applied to redeem Bonds. The
issuer of certain Bonds in a Trust may have sold or reserved the right to
sell, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, to third parties all or any
portion of its rights to call Bonds in accordance with the stated redemption
provisions of such Bonds. In such a case the issuer no longer has the right to
call the Bonds for redemption unless it reacquires the rights from such third
party. A third party pursuant to these rights may exercise the redemption
provisions with respect to a Bond at a time when the issuer of the Bond might
not have called a Bond for redemption had it not sold such rights. The Sponsor
is unable to predict all of the circumstances which may result in such
redemption of an issue of Bonds. See "Portfolio" for each Trust and footnote
(3) in the "Notes to Portfolios". See also the discussion of single family
mortgage and multi-family revenue bonds above for more information on the call
provisions of such bonds.
DISTRIBUTIONS. Distributions of interest received by the Fund, pro rated
on an annual basis, will be made monthly. The first such distribution will be
in the amount indicated under 'Per Unit Information' for the applicable Trust
and will be made on the fifteenth day of the month indicated under "Initial
Distribution" therein to Unitholders of record on the first day of such month.
Distribution of funds from the Principal Account, if any, will also be made
monthly, except under certain special circumstances (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Distributions of Interest and Principal").
CERTIFICATES. The Trustee is authorized to treat as the record owner of
Units that person who is registered as such owner on the books of the Trustee.
Ownership of Units of each Trust is evidenced by separate registered
certificates executed by the Trustee and the Sponsor. Certificates are
transferable by presentation and surrender to the Trustee properly endorsed or
accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer. A Unitholder
must sign exactly as his name appears on the face of the certificate with the
signature guaranteed by a participant in the Securities Transfer Agents
Medallion Program ("STAMP") or such other signature guaranty program in
addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, as may be accepted by the Trustee.
In certain instances the Trustee may require additional documents such as, but
not limited to, trust instruments, certificates of death, appointments as
executor or administrator or certificates of corporate authority. Certificates
will be issued in denominations of one Unit or any multiple thereof.
Although no such charge is now made or contemplated, the Trustee may
require a Unitholder to pay a reasonable fee for each certificate re-issued
(other than as a result of a change in plan of distribution) or transferred
and to pay any governmental charge that may be imposed in connection with each
such transfer or interchange. Destroyed, stolen, mutilated or lost
certificates will be replaced upon delivery to the Trustee of satisfactory
indemnity, evidence of ownership and payment of expenses incurred. Mutilated
certificates must be surrendered to the Trustee for replacement.
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURNS AND ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURNS
As of the opening of business on the Date of Deposit (except for the
IM-IT and the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the
Date of Deposit), the Estimated Current Return and the Estimated Long-Term
Return
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 13
were as set forth in the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust. Estimated
Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net annual interest
income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated net annual
interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and expenses of the
Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering Price will
vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying Securities and with
changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no assurance that the
present Estimated Current Return will be realized in the future. Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in a Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales charge
associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of a Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Return will be realized
in the future. The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are
expected to differ because the calculation of Estimated Long-Term Return
reflects the estimated date and amount of principal returned while the
Estimated Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income
and Public Offering Price.
In order to acquire certain of the Securities contracted for by the
Sponsor for deposit in the Fund, it may be necessary for the Sponsor or
Trustee to pay on the settlement dates for delivery of such Securities amounts
covering accrued interest on such Securities which exceed (1) the amounts paid
by Unitholders and (2) the amounts which will be made available through cash
furnished by the Sponsor on the Date of Deposit, which amount of cash may
exceed the interest which would accrue to the First Settlement Date. The
Trustee has agreed to pay for any amounts necessary to cover any such excess
and will be reimbursed therefor, without interest, when funds become available
from interest payments on the particular Securities with respect to which such
payments may have been made. Also, since interest on any "when, as and if
issued" Securities does not begin accruing as tax-exempt interest income to
the benefit of Unitholders until their respective dates of delivery, the
Trustee may, in order to maintain (or in some cases approach) for the
Unitholders the same estimated net annual interest incomes during the first
year of the Trusts' operations as is indicated under "Per Unit Information"
for the applicable Trust, reduce its fee (and to the extent necessary pay
Trust expenses) in an amount equal to that indicated under "Per Unit
Information" for the applicable Trust.
INTEREST EARNING SCHEDULE
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL INTEREST INCOME. The estimated net
annual interest income is based on 360 days. To account for the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit in a Trust, it is necessary to use the
following information.
The beginning interest date for each Trust is January 13, 1994 and the
first record date for each Trust (February 1, 1994) is 18 days from such date.
The daily rates of estimated net annual interest income per Unit are $.14123,
$.13265, $.13616, $.11544 and $.13510 for the IM-IT, IM-IT Limited Maturity,
Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trusts, respectively. This amounts to $2.54, $2.39, $2.45, $2.08 and
$2.43 for the IM-IT, IM-IT Limited Maturity, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts, respectively.
Utilizing the preceding information, the following procedure illustrates
the calculation of first year estimated net annual interest income per Unit
for the Michigan IM-IT Trust:
The Michigan IM-IT Trust accrues
$2.45 to the first record date plus
$40.90 which is 10 normal distributions at $4.09, and finally adding
$5.67 which has accrued from December 1, 1994 until January 13, 1995
which completes the 360 day cycle (42 days times the daily
factor)
Total $49.02 interest earned / $1,000.00 (Date of Deposit Public Offering
Price) = 4.90% Estimated Current Return as of the Date of
Deposit.
<PAGE>
14 Unitholder Explanations
PURCHASED AND ACCRUED INTEREST
PURCHASED INTEREST. Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid
interest that has accrued on the Securities from the later of the last payment
date on the Securities or the date of issuance thereof through the First
Settlement Date and is included in the calculation of the Public Offering
Price. Purchased Interest will be distributed to Unitholders as Units are
redeemed or Securities mature or are called. See "Summary of Essential
Financial Information" for the amount of Purchased Interest per Unit for each
Trust. Purchased Interest is an element of the price Unitholders will receive
in connection with the sale or redemption of Units prior to the termination of
the Trust.
ACCRUED INTEREST. Accrued Interest is an accumulation of unpaid interest
on securities which generally is paid semi-annually, although the Trust
accrues such interest daily. Because of this, the Trust always has an amount
of interest earned but not yet collected by the Trustee. For this reason, with
respect to sales settling subsequent to the First Settlement Date, the Public
Offering Price of Units will have added to it the proportionate share of
accrued interest to the date of settlement. Unitholders will receive on the
next distribution date of the Trust the amount, if any, of accrued interest
paid on their Units.
As indicated in "Purchased Interest", accrued interest as of the First
Settlement Date includes Purchased Interest. In an effort to reduce the amount
of Purchased Interest which would otherwise have to be paid by Unitholders,
the Trustee may advance a portion of such accrued interest to the Sponsor as
the Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date. Consequently, the
amount of accrued interest to be added to the Public Offering Price of Units
will include only accrued interest from the First Settlement Date to the date
of settlement (other than the Purchased Interest already included therein),
less any distributions from the Interest Account subsequent to the First
Settlement Date. See "Public Offering--Distributions of Interest and
Principal."
Because of the varying interest payment dates of the Securities, accrued
interest at any point in time will be greater than the amount of interest
actually received by a Trust and distributed to Unitholders. If a Unitholder
sells or redeems all or a portion of his Units, he will be entitled to receive
his proportionate share of the Purchased Interest and accrued interest from
the purchaser of his Units. Since the Trustee has the use of the funds
(including Purchased Interest) held in the Interest Account for distributions
to Unitholders and since such Account is non-interest-bearing to Unitholders,
the Trustee benefits thereby.
PUBLIC OFFERING
GENERAL. Units are offered at the Public Offering Price which includes
Purchased Interest. During the initial offering period the Public Offering
Price is based on the offering prices of the Securities in each Trust and
includes a sales charge of 4.9% of the Public Offering Price (excluding
Purchased Interest) (5.152% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities)
for an IM-IT or a State Trust (other than a State Intermediate Laddered
Maturity Trust), 4.3% of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased
Interest) (4.493% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities) for an
IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, 3.9% of the Public Offering Price (excluding
Purchased Interest) (4.058% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities)
for an IM-IT Intermediate Trust and 3.0% of the Public Offering Price
(excluding Purchased Interest) (3.093% of the aggregate offering price of the
Securities) for an IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust or a State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust. After the initial public offering period, the
secondary market Public Offering Price is based on the bid prices of the
Securities in each Trust and includes a sales charge determined in accordance
with the table set forth below, which is based upon the dollar weighted
average maturity of each Trust plus in each case Purchased Interest. For
purposes of computation, Bonds will be deemed to mature on their expressed
maturity dates unless: (a) the Bonds have been called for redemption or funds
or securities have been placed in escrow to redeem them on an earlier call
date, in which case such call date will be deemed to be the date upon which
they mature; or (b) such Bonds are subject to a "mandatory tender", in which
case such mandatory tender will be deemed to be the date upon which they
mature.
The effect of this method of sales charge computation will be that
different sales charge rates will be applied to each Trust based upon the
dollar weighted average maturity of such Trust's Portfolio, in accordance with
the following schedule:
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 15
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS TO MATURITY SALES CHARGE YEARS TO MATURITY SALES CHARGE
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1................... 1.523% 9.................... 4.712%
2................... 2.041 10................... 4.932
3................... 2.564 11................... 4.932
4................... 3.199 12................... 4.932
5................... 3.842 13................... 5.374
6................... 4.058 14................... 5.374
7................... 4.275 15................... 5.374
8................... 4.493 16 to 30............. 6.045
</TABLE>
The sales charges in the above table are expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate bid prices of the Securities in a Trust. Expressed as a percent of
the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest), the sales charge on
a Trust consisting entirely of a portfolio of Bonds with 15 years to maturity
would be 5.10%. The sales charge applicable to quantity purchases during the
initial offering period is, however, reduced on a graduated basis to any
person acquiring 100 or more Units as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DOLLAR AMOUNT OF SALES
CHARGE REDUCTION PER UNIT
IM-IT,
STATE (OTHER THAN A
STATE INTERMEDIATE
LADDERED MATURITY
AGGREGATE NUMBER OF TRUST) AND NATIONAL
UNITS PURCHASED QUALITY TRUSTS OTHER TRUSTS
<S> <C> <C>
100-249 Units................................... $ 4.00 $ 4.00
250-499 Units................................... $ 6.00 $ 6.00
500-999 Units................................... $ 14.00 $ 9.00
1,000 or more Units............................. $ 19.00 $ 11.00
</TABLE>
Any such reduced sales charge shall be the responsibility of the selling
Underwriter, broker, dealer or agent. The Sponsor will, however, increase the
concession or agency commission for such quantity purchases. See "Public
Offering--Unit Distribution". This reduced sales charge structure will apply
on all purchases by the same person from any one Underwriter or dealer of
units of Van Kampen Merritt-sponsored unit investment trusts which are being
offered in the initial offering period (a) on any one day (the "Initial
Purchase Date") or (b) on any day subsequent to the Initial Purchase Date, if
(1) the units purchased are of a unit investment trust purchased on the
Initial Purchase Date, and (2) the person purchasing the units purchased a
sufficient amount of units on the Initial Purchase Date to qualify for a
reduced sales charge on such date. To determine the applicable sales charge
for units purchased in accordance with (b) above, it is necessary to
accumulate all purchases made on the Initial Purchase Date and all purchases
made in accordance with (b) above. Units purchased in the name of the spouse
of a purchaser or in the name of a child of such purchaser under 21 years of
age will be deemed for the purposes of calculating the applicable sales charge
to be additional purchases by the purchaser. The reduced sales charges will
also be applicable to a trustee or other fiduciary purchasing securities for
one or more trust estate or fiduciary accounts. Employees of Van Kampen
Merritt Inc. and its subsidiaries may purchase Units of the Trust at the
current Public Offering Price less the underwriting commission during the
initial offering period, and less the dealer's concession for secondary market
transactions. Registered representatives of selling Underwriters may purchase
Units of the Fund at the current Public Offering Price less the underwriting
commission during the initial offering period, and less the dealer's
concession for secondary market transactions. Registered representatives of
selling brokers, dealers, or agents may purchase Units of the Fund at the
current Public Offering Price less the dealer's concession during the initial
offering period and for secondary market transactions.
OFFERING PRICE. Public Offering Price of the Units will vary from the
amounts stated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information" in
accordance with fluctuations in the prices of the underlying Securities in
each Trust.
As indicated above, the price of the Units as of the date the Securities
were deposited in each Trust was determined by adding to the aggregate
offering price of the Securities of a Trust an amount equal to the applicable
<PAGE>
16 Unitholder Explanations
sales charge expressed as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the
Securities plus Purchased Interest and dividing the sum so obtained by the
number of Units outstanding. This computation produced a gross underwriting
commission equal to such sales charge expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest). Such price determination as of
the opening of business on the Date of Deposit (except for the IM-IT and the
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit)
was made on the basis of an evaluation of the Securities in each Trust
prepared by Interactive Data Services, Inc., a firm regularly engaged in the
business of evaluating, quoting or appraising comparable securities. After the
opening of business on the Date of Deposit (except for the IM-IT and the
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit)
and during the period of initial offering, the Evaluator will appraise or
cause to be appraised daily the value of the underlying Securities of each
Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days the New York Stock Exchange is open
for business and will adjust the Public Offering Price of the Units
commensurate with such appraisal. Such Public Offering Price will be effective
for all orders received at or prior to 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on each such
day. Orders received by the Trustee, Sponsor or any Underwriter for purchases,
sales or redemptions after that time, or on a day when the New York Stock
Exchange is closed, will be held until the next determination of price. For
secondary market sales the Public Offering Price per Unit will be equal to the
aggregate bid price of the Securities in the Trust plus an amount equal to the
applicable secondary market sales charge expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate bid price of the Securities plus Purchased Interest and dividing the
sum so attained by the number of Units then outstanding. This computation
produces a gross commission equal to such sales charge expressed as a
percentage of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest). For
secondary market purposes such appraisal and adjustment with respect to a
Trust will be made by the Evaluator as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days in
which the New York Stock Exchange is open for each day on which any Unit of
such Trust is tendered for redemption, and it shall determine the aggregate
value of any Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on such other days as may be
necessary.
The aggregate price of the Securities in each Trust has been and will be
determined on the basis of bid prices or offering prices, as is appropriate,
(a) on the basis of current market prices for the Securities obtained from
dealers or brokers who customarily deal in bonds comparable to those held by
the Fund; (b) if such prices are not available for any particular Securities,
on the basis of current market prices for comparable bonds; (c) by causing the
value of the Securities to be determined by others engaged in the practice of
evaluation, quoting or appraising comparable bonds; or (d) by any combination
of the above. Market prices of the Securities will generally fluctuate with
changes in market interest rates. Unless Bonds are in default in payment of
principal or interest or in significant risk of such default, the Evaluator
will not attribute any value to the insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any.
The Evaluator will consider in its evaluation of Bonds which are in
default in payment of principal or interest or, in the Sponsor's opinion, in
significant risk of such default (the "Defaulted Bonds") the value of the
insurance guaranteeing interest and principal payments. The value of the
insurance will be equal to the difference between (i) the market value of
Defaulted Bonds assuming the exercise of the right to obtain Permanent
Insurance (less the insurance premiums and related expenses attributable to
the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value of such
Defaulted Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. In addition, the Evaluator
will consider the ability of the affected Portfolio Insurer to meet its
commitments under any Trust insurance policy, including the commitments to
issue Permanent Insurance. It is the position of the Sponsor that this is a
fair method of valuing the Bonds and the insurance obtained by an Insured
Trust and reflects a proper valuation method in accordance with the provisions
of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
No value has been ascribed to insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any, as of the date of this Prospectus.
The initial or primary Public Offering Price of the Units is equal to the
offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust plus the
applicable sales charge plus Purchased Interest and interest accrued but
unpaid from the First Settlement Date to the date of settlement. The secondary
market Public Offering Price is equal to the bid price per Unit of the
Securities in each Trust plus the applicable sales charge plus Purchased
Interest and accrued interest. The offering price of Securities in each Trust
may be expected to average approximately 0.5%-1% more than the bid price of
such Securities. On the Date of Deposit, the offering side evaluations of the
Securities in the Trusts
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 17
were higher than the bid side evaluations of such Securities by the respective
amounts indicated under footnote (5) in "Notes to Portfolios".
Although payment is normally made five business days following the order
for purchase, payment may be made prior thereto. A person will become the
owner of Units on the date of settlement provided payment has been received.
Cash, if any, made available to the Sponsor prior to the date of settlement
for the purchase of Units may be used in the Sponsor's business and may be
deemed to be a benefit to the Sponsor, subject to the limitations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Delivery of certificates representing Units
so ordered will be made five business days following such order or shortly
thereafter. See "Redemption of Units" below for information regarding the
ability to redeem Units ordered for purchase.
MARKET FOR UNITS. During the initial public offering period, the Sponsor
and/or certain of the Underwriters intend to offer to purchase Units at a
price equivalent to the Public Offering Price which is based upon the
aggregate offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust
and the amount of Purchased Interest for each Trust plus accrued interest to
the date of settlement less the related sales commission. Afterward, although
they are not obligated to do so, the Sponsor intends to, and certain of the
other Underwriters may, maintain a market for the Units offered hereby and to
offer continuously to purchase such Units at prices, subject to change at any
time, based upon the aggregate bid prices of the Securities in the portfolio
of each Trust plus Purchased Interest plus interest accrued to the date of
settlement and plus any principal cash on hand, less any amounts representing
taxes or other governmental charges payable out of the Trust and less any
accrued Trust expenses. If the supply of Units exceeds demand or if some other
business reason warrants it, the Sponsor and/or the Underwriters may either
discontinue all purchases of Units or discontinue purchases of Units at such
prices. In the event that a market is not maintained for the Units and the
Unitholder cannot find another purchaser, a Unitholder of any Trust desiring
to dispose of his Units may be able to dispose of such Units only by tendering
them to the Trustee for redemption at the Redemption Price, which is based
upon the aggregate bid price of the Securities in the portfolio of such Trust
plus Purchased Interest and any accrued interest. The aggregate bid prices of
the underlying Securities in a Trust are expected to be less than the related
aggregate offering prices. See "Redemption of Units" below. A Unitholder who
wishes to dispose of his Units should inquire of his broker as to current
market prices in order to determine whether there is in existence any price in
excess of the Redemption Price and, if so, the amount thereof.
DISTRIBUTIONS OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL. Interest received by the Fund,
including that part of the proceeds of any disposition of Securities which
represents Purchased Interest and/or accrued interest, is credited by the
Trustee to the Interest Account for the appropriate Trust. Other receipts are
credited to the Principal Account for the appropriate Trust. Interest received
by the Fund after deduction of amounts sufficient to reimburse the Trustee,
without interest, for any amounts advanced and paid to the Sponsor as the
Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date (see "Public
Offering--Offering Price" above) will be distributed on or shortly after the
fifteenth day of each month on a pro rata basis to Unitholders of record of a
Trust as of the preceding record date who are entitled to distributions at
that time. All distributions will be net of applicable expenses. The pro rata
share of cash in the Principal Account of a Trust will be computed as of the
date set forth under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust, and
thereafter as of the record date, and distributions to the Unitholders as of
such record date will be made on or shortly after the fifteenth day of such
month. Proceeds received from the disposition of any of the Securities after
such record date and prior to the following distribution date will be held in
the Principal Account and not distributed until the next distribution date.
The Trustee is not required to pay interest on funds held in any Principal or
Interest Account (but may itself earn interest thereon and therefore benefits
from the use of such funds) nor to make a distribution from the Principal
Account unless the amount available for distribution therein shall equal at
least $1.00 per Unit. However, should the amount available for distribution in
the Principal Account equal or exceed $10.00 per Unit, the Trustee will make a
special distribution from the Principal Account on the next succeeding
distribution date to holders of record on the related record date.
The distribution to the Unitholders of a Trust as of each record date
after the First Settlement Date will be made on the following distribution
date or shortly thereafter and shall consist of an amount substantially equal
to such portion of the Unitholder's pro rata share of the estimated net Annual
interest Income in the Interest Account of such
<PAGE>
18 Unitholder Explanations
Trust after deducting estimated expenses. Because interest payments are not
received by the Fund at a constant rate throughout the year, such interest
distribution may be more or less than the amount credited to such Interest
Account as of the record date. For the purpose of minimizing fluctuations in
the distributions from an Interest Account, the Trustee is authorized to
advance such amounts as may be necessary to provide interest distributions of
approximately equal amounts. The Trustee shall be reimbursed, without
interest, for any such advances from funds in the applicable Interest Account
on the ensuing record date. Persons who purchase Units between a record date
and a distribution date will receive their first distribution on the second
distribution date after the purchase.
As of the first day of each month, the Trustee will deduct from the
Interest Account and, to the extent funds are not sufficient therein, from the
Principal Account, amounts necessary to pay the expenses of the Fund (as
determined on the basis set forth under "Trust Administration--Fund
Administration and Expenses"). The Trustee also may withdraw from said
Accounts such amounts, if any, as it deems necessary to establish a reserve
for any governmental charges payable out of the Fund. Amounts so withdrawn
shall not be considered a part of the Fund's assets until such time as the
Trustee shall return all or any part of such amounts to the appropriate
Accounts. In addition, the Trustee may withdraw from the Interest and
Principal Accounts such amounts as may be necessary to cover purchases of
Replacement Bonds and redemptions of Units by the Trustee.
REINVESTMENT OPTION. Unitholders of all unit investment trusts sponsored
by Van Kampen Merritt Inc. (except Unitholders of a New York IM-IT Trust or a
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust), may elect to have each
distribution of interest income, capital gains and/or principal on their Units
automatically reinvested in shares of any of the open ended mutual funds
(except for B shares) listed under "Trust Administration--Sponsor" which are
registered in the Unitholder's state of residence. New York IM-IT Trust and
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust Unitholders, other than
those residing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, may elect to have each
distribution of interest income, capital gains and/or principal on their Units
automatically reinvested in shares of First Investors New York Insured Tax
Free Fund, Inc., a fund which invests primarily in securities exempt from
federal and New York state and city income tax. Such mutual funds are
hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Reinvestment Funds".
Each Reinvestment Fund has investment objectives which differ in certain
respects from those of the Trusts. The prospectus relating to each
Reinvestment Fund describes the investment policies of such fund and sets
forth the procedures to follow to commence reinvestment. A Unitholder may
obtain a prospectus for the respective Reinvestment Funds from Van Kampen
Merritt Inc. at One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181. Texas
residents who desire to reinvest may request that a broker-dealer registered
in Texas send the prospectus relating to the respective fund.
After becoming a participant in a reinvestment plan, each distribution of
interest income, capital gains and/or principal on the participant's Units
will, on the applicable distribution date, automatically be applied, as
directed by such person, as of such distribution date by the Trustee to
purchase shares (or fractions thereof) of the applicable Reinvestment Fund at
a net asset value as computed as of the close of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on such date, plus a sales charge of $1.00 per $100 of reinvestment
except if the participant selects the First Investors New York Insured Tax
Free Fund, Inc., in which case the sales charge will be $1.50 per $100 of
reinvestment, or except if the participant selects the Van Kampen Merritt
Money Market Fund or the Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free Money Fund in which case
no sales charge applies. A minimum of one-half of such sales charge would be
paid to Van Kampen Merritt Inc. for all Reinvestment Funds except First
Investors New York Insured Tax Free Fund, Inc., in which case such sales
charge would be paid to First Investors Management Company, Inc.
Confirmations of all reinvestments by a Unitholder into a Reinvestment
Fund will be mailed to the Unitholder by such Reinvestment Fund.
A participant may at any time prior to five days preceding the next
succeeding distribution date, by so notifying the Trustee in writing, elect to
terminate his or her reinvestment plan and receive future distributions of his
or her Units in cash. There will be no charge or other penalty for such
termination. Each Reinvestment Fund, its sponsor and investment adviser shall
have the right to terminate at any time the reinvestment plan relating to such
fund.
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 19
REDEMPTION OF UNITS. A Unitholder may redeem all or a portion of his
Units by tender to the Trustee, at its Unit Investment Trust Division, 101
Barclay Street, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10286, of the certificates
representing the Units to be redeemed, duly endorsed or accompanied by proper
instruments of transfer with signature guaranteed (or by providing
satisfactory indemnity, as in connection with lost, stolen or destroyed
certificates) and by payment of applicable governmental charges, if any. Thus,
redemption of Units cannot be effected until certificates representing such
Units have been delivered to the person seeking redemption or satisfactory
indemnity provided. No redemption fee will be charged. On the seventh calendar
day following such tender, or if the seventh calendar day is not a business
day, on the first business day prior thereto, the Unitholder will be entitled
to receive in cash an amount for each Unit equal to the Redemption Price per
Unit next computed after receipt by the Trustee of such tender of Units. The
"date of tender" is deemed to be the date on which Units are received by the
Trustee, except that as regards Units received after 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on
days of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, the date of tender is the next
day on which such Exchange is open for trading and such Units will be deemed
to have been tendered to the Trustee on such day for redemption at the
Redemption Price computed on that day.
Under regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service, the Trustee
will be required to withhold a specified percentage of the principal amount of
a Unit redemption if the Trustee has not been furnished the redeeming
Unitholder's tax identification number in the manner required by such
regulations. Any amount so withheld is transmitted to the Internal Revenue
Service and may be recovered by the Unitholder only when filing a return.
Under normal circumstances the Trustee obtains the Unitholder's tax
identification number from the selling broker. However, at any time a
Unitholder elects to tender Units for redemption, such Unitholder should
provide a tax identification number to the Trustee in order to avoid this
possible "back-up withholding" in the event the Trustee has not been
previously provided such number.
Purchased Interest and accrued interest paid on redemption shall be
withdrawn from the Interest Account of such Trust or, if the balance therein
is insufficient, from the Principal Account of such Trust. All other amounts
will be withdrawn from the Principal Account of such Trust. The Trustee is
empowered to sell underlying Securities of a Trust in order to make funds
available for redemption. Units so redeemed shall be cancelled.
The Redemption Price per Unit (as well as the secondary market Public
Offering Price) will be determined on the basis of the bid price of the
Securities in each Trust, while the initial and primary Public Offering Price
of Units will be determined on the basis of the offering price of the
Securities in each Trust, as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on
the New York Stock Exchange on the date any such determination is made. On the
Date of Deposit the Public Offering Price per Unit (which is based on the
offering prices of the Bonds and Purchased Interest in each Trust and includes
the sales charge) exceeded the value at which Units could have been redeemed
(based upon the current bid prices of the Securities and Purchased Interest in
such Trust) by the amount shown under "Summary of Essential Financial
Information". While the Trustee has the power to determine the Redemption
Price per Unit when Units are tendered for redemption, such authority has been
delegated to the Evaluator which determines the price per Unit on a daily
basis. The Redemption Price per Unit is the pro rata share of each Unit in
each Trust on the basis of (i) the cash on hand in such Trust or moneys in the
process of being collected, (ii) the value of the Securities in such Trust
based on the bid prices of the Securities therein, except for cases in which
the value of insurance has been included, (iii) Purchased Interest for each
Trust and (iv) interest accrued thereon, less (a) amounts representing taxes
or other governmental charges payable out of such Trust and (b) the accrued
expenses of such Trust. The Evaluator may determine the value of the
Securities in each Trust by employing any of the methods set forth in "Public
Offering--Offering Price". In determining the Redemption Price per Unit no
value will be assigned to the portfolio insurance maintained on the Bonds in
an Insured Trust unless such Bonds are in default in payment of principal or
interest or in significant risk of such default. For a description of the
situations in which the Evaluator may value the insurance obtained by the
Insured Trusts, see "Public Offering--Offering Price" above.
The price at which Units may be redeemed could be less than the price
paid by the Unitholder. As stated above, the Trustee may sell Securities to
cover redemptions. When Securities are sold, the size and diversity of the
affected Trust will be reduced. Such sales may be required at a time when
Securities would not otherwise be sold and might result in lower prices than
might otherwise be realized.
<PAGE>
20 Unitholder Explanations
The right of redemption may be suspended and payment postponed for any
period during which the New York Stock Exchange is closed, other than for
customary weekend and holiday closings, or during which the Securities and
Exchange Commission determines that trading on that Exchange is restricted or
an emergency exists, as a result of which disposal or evaluation of the
Securities in the Trusts is not reasonably practicable, or for such other
periods as the Securities and Exchange Commission may by order permit. Under
certain extreme circumstances the Sponsor may apply to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for an order permitting a full or partial suspension of
the right of Unitholders to redeem their Units.
REPORTS PROVIDED. The Trustee shall furnish Unitholders of a Trust in
connection with each distribution a statement of the amount of interest and
the amount of other receipts (received since the preceding distribution), if
any, being distributed expressed in each case as a dollar amount representing
the pro rata share of each Unit of a Trust outstanding. For as long as the
Trustee deems it to be in the best interests of the Unitholders, the accounts
of each Trust shall be audited, not less frequently than annually, by
independent certified public accountants and the report of such accountants
shall be furnished by the Trustee to Unitholders of such Trusts upon request.
Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year, the
Trustee shall furnish to each person who at any time during the calendar year
was a registered Unitholder of a Trust a statement (i) as to the Interest
Account: interest received (including amounts representing interest received
upon any disposition of Securities) and the percentage of such interest by
states in which the issuers of the Securities are located, deductions for
applicable taxes and for fees and expenses of such Trust, for purchases of
Replacement Bonds and for redemptions of Units, if any, and the balance
remaining after such distributions and deductions, expressed in each case both
as a total dollar amount and as a dollar amount representing the pro rata
share of each Unit outstanding on the last business day of such calendar year;
(ii) as to the Principal Account: the dates of disposition of any Securities
and the net proceeds received therefrom (excluding any portion representing
accrued interest), the amount paid for purchases of Replacement Bonds and for
redemptions of Units, if any, deductions for payment of applicable taxes and
fees and expenses of the Trustee, the amount of "when issued" interest treated
as a return of capital, if any, and the balance remaining after such
distributions and deductions expressed both as a total dollar amount and as a
dollar amount representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding on the
last business day of such calendar year; (iii) a list of the Securities held
and the number of Units outstanding on the last business day of such calendar
year; (iv) the Redemption Price per Unit based upon the last computation
thereof made during such calendar year; and (v) amounts actually distributed
during such calendar year from the Interest and Principal Accounts, separately
stated, expressed both as total dollar amounts and as dollar amounts
representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding.
In order to comply with Federal and state tax reporting requirements,
Unitholders will be furnished, upon request to the Trustee, evaluations of the
Securities in a Trust furnished to it by the Evaluator.
INSURANCE ON THE BONDS IN THE INSURED TRUSTS
Insurance has been obtained by each Insured Trust or by the issuer of
such Bonds, or by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds in a Trust guaranteeing prompt payment of interest and
principal, when due, in respect of the Bonds in such Trust. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and Securities
Selection". An insurance policy obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, is non-
cancellable and will continue in force so long as such Trust is in existence,
the respective Portfolio Insurer referred to below is still in business and
the Bonds described in such policy continue to be held by such Trust (see
"Portfolio" for the respective Insured Trust). Any portfolio insurance premium
for an Insured Trust, which is an obligation of such Trust, is paid by each
Trust on a monthly basis. Non-payment of premiums on a policy obtained by an
Insured Trust will not result in the cancellation of insurance but will force
the insurer to take action against the Trustee to recover premium payments due
it. The Trustee in turn will be entitled to recover such payments from such
Trust. Premium rates for each issue of Bonds protected by a policy obtained by
an Insured Trust, if any, are fixed for the life of the Trust. The premium for
any Preinsured Bond insurance has been paid by such issuer, by a prior owner
of such Bonds or the Sponsor and any such policy or policies are
non-cancellable and will continue in force so long as the Bonds so insured are
outstanding and the respective Preinsured Bond Insurer remains in business. If
the provider of an original
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 21
issuance insurance policy is unable to meet its obligations under such policy
or if the rating assigned to the claims-paying ability of any such insurer
deteriorates, the Portfolio Insurers have no obligation to insure any issue
adversely affected by either of the above described events.
The aforementioned portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any, guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on the Bonds as
they fall due. For the purposes of insurance obtained by an Insured Trust,
"when due" generally means the stated maturity date for the payment of
principal and interest. However, in the event (a) an issuer of a Bond defaults
in the payment of principal or interest on such Bond, (b) such issuer enters
into a bankruptcy proceeding or (c) the maturity of such Bond is accelerated,
the affected Portfolio Insurer has the option, in its sole discretion, after
receiving notice of the earliest to occur of such a default, bankruptcy
proceeding or acceleration to pay the outstanding principal amount of such
Bond plus accrued interest to the date of such payment and thereby retire the
Bond from the affected Trust prior to such Bond's stated maturity date. The
insurance does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the
Units. Insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, is only effective as to
Bonds owned by and held in such Trust. In the event of a sale of any such Bond
by the Trustee, such insurance terminates as to such Bond on the date of sale.
Pursuant to an irrevocable commitment of the Portfolio Insurers, the
Trustee, upon the sale of a Bond covered under a portfolio insurance policy
obtained by an Insured Trust, has the right to obtain permanent insurance with
respect to such Bond (i.e., insurance to maturity of the Bonds regardless of
the identity of the holder thereof) (the "Permanent Insurance") upon the
payment of a single predetermined insurance premium and any expenses related
thereto from the proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any Bond in
an Insured Trust is eligible to be sold on an insured basis. It is expected
that the Trustee would exercise the right to obtain Permanent Insurance only
if upon such exercise the affected Trust would receive net proceeds (sale of
Bond proceeds less the insurance premium and related expenses attributable to
the Permanent Insurance) from such sale in excess of the sale proceeds if such
Bonds were sold on an uninsured basis. The insurance premium with respect to
each Bond eligible for Permanent Insurance would be determined based upon the
insurability of each Bond as of the Date of Deposit and would not be increased
or decreased for any change in the creditworthiness of each Bond.
The Sponsor believes that the Permanent Insurance option provides an
advantage to an Insured Trust in that each Bond insured by a Trust insurance
policy may be sold out of the affected Trust with the benefits of the
insurance attaching thereto. Thus, the value of the insurance, if any, at the
time of sale, can be realized in the market value of the Bond so sold (which
is not the case in connection with any value attributable to an Insured
Trust's portfolio insurance). See "Public Offering--Offering Price". Because
any such insurance value may be realized in the market value of the Bond upon
the sale thereof upon exercise of the Permanent Insurance option, the Sponsor
anticipates that (a) in the event an Insured Trust were to be comprised of a
substantial percentage of Bonds in default or significant risk of default, it
is much less likely that such Trust would need at some point in time to seek a
suspension of redemptions of Units than if such Trust were to have no such
option (see "Public Offering--Redemption of Units") and (b) at the time of
termination of an Insured Trust, if such Trust were holding defaulted Bonds or
Bonds in significant risk of default such Trust would not need to hold such
Bonds until their respective maturities in order to realize the benefits of
such Trust's portfolio insurance (see "Trust Administration--Amendment or
Termination").
Except as indicated below, insurance obtained by an Insured Trust has no
effect on the price or redemption value of Units. It is the present intention
of the Evaluator to attribute a value for such insurance (including the right
to obtain Permanent Insurance) for the purpose of computing the price or
redemption value of Units if the Bonds covered by such insurance are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default. The value of the insurance will be the difference between (i) the
market value of a Bond which is in default in payment of principal or interest
or in significant risk of such default assuming the exercise of the right to
obtain Permanent Insurance (less the insurance premium and related expenses
attributable to the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value
of such Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. See "Public
Offering--Offering Price". It is also the present intention of the Trustee not
to sell such Bonds to effect redemptions or for any other reason but rather to
retain them in the portfolio because value attributable to the insurance
cannot be realized upon sale. See "Public Offering-- Offering Price" herein
for a more complete description of an Insured Trust's method of valuing
defaulted Bonds and
<PAGE>
22 Unitholder Explanations
Bonds which have a significant risk of default. Insurance obtained by the
issuer of a Bond is effective so long as such Bond is outstanding. Therefore,
any such insurance may be considered to represent an element of market value
in regard to the Bonds thus insured, but the exact effect, if any, of this
insurance on such market value cannot be predicted.
The portfolio insurance policy or policies obtained by an Insured Trust,
if any, with respect to the Bonds in such Trust were issued by one or more of
the Portfolio Insurers. Any other Preinsured Bond insurance policy (or
commitment therefor) was issued by one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers. See
"Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and
Securities Selection".
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity") is a Wisconsin-domiciled
stock insurance corporation regulated by the Office of the Commissioner of
Insurance of the State of Wisconsin and licensed to do business in 50 states,
the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, with admitted
assets of approximately $1,936,000,000 (unaudited) and statutory capital of
approximately $1,096,000,000 (unaudited) as of September 30, 1993. Statutory
capital consists of AMBAC Indemnity's policyholders' surplus and statutory
contingency reserve. AMBAC Indemnity is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMBAC
Inc., a 100% publicly-held company. Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and
Standard & Poor's Corporation have both assigned a triple-A claims-paying
ability rating to AMBAC Indemnity.
Copies of its financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting standards are available from AMBAC Indemnity. The address of AMBAC
Indemnity's administrative offices and its telephone number are One State
Street Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, 10004 and (212) 668-0340.
AMBAC Indemnity has entered into quota share reinsurance agreements under
which a percentage of the insurance underwritten pursuant to certain municipal
bond insurance programs of AMBAC Indemnity has been and will be assumed by a
number of foreign and domestic unaffiliated reinsurers.
Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation ("MBIA") is the principal
operating subsidiary of MBIA Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed company.
MBIA Inc. is not obligated to pay the debts of or claims against MBIA. MBIA is
a limited liability corporation rather than a several liability association.
MBIA is domiciled in the State of New York and licensed to do business in all
fifty states, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. As
of December 31, 1992 MBIA had admitted assets of $2.6 billion (audited), total
liabilities of $1.7 billion (audited), and total capital and surplus of $896
million (audited) determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. As of June 30,
1993, MBIA had admitted assets of $2.9 billion (unaudited), total liabilities
of $1.9 billion (uaudited), and total capital and surplus of $945 million
(unaudited) determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. Copies of MBIA's
year end financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting
practices are available from MBIA. The address of MBIA is 113 King Street,
Armonk, New York 10504.
Effective December 31, 1989, MBIA Inc. acquired Bond Investors Group,
Inc. On January 5, 1990, MBIA acquired all of the outstanding stock of Bond
Investors Group, Inc., the parent of Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance Company
(BIG), now known as MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois. Through a reinsurance
agreement, BIG has ceded all of its net insured risks, as well as its unearned
premium and contingency reserves, to MBIA and MBIA has reinsured BIG's net
outstanding exposure.
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rates all bond issues insured by MBIA
"Aaa" and short term loans "MIG 1," both designated to be of the highest
quality.
Standard & Poor's Corporation rates all new issues insured by MBIA "AAA"
Prime Grade.
The Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating of MBIA should be evaluated
independently of the Standard & Poor's Corporation rating of MBIA. No
application has been made to any other rating agency in order to obtain
additional ratings on the Bonds. The ratings reflect the respective rating
agency's current assessment of the creditworthiness of MBIA and its ability to
pay claims on its policies of insurance. Any further explanation as to the
significance of the above ratings may be obtained only from the applicable
rating agency.
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 23
The above ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Bonds,
and such ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the
rating agencies. Any downward revision or withdrawal of either or both ratings
may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds.
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty" or "FGIC") is
a wholly-owned subsidiary of FGIC Corporation (the "Corporation"), a Delaware
holding company. The Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General
Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC"). Neither the Corporation nor GECC is
obligated to pay the debts of or the claims against Financial Guaranty.
Financial Guaranty is domiciled in the State of New York and is subject to
regulation by the State of New York Insurance Department. As of September 30,
1993, the total capital and surplus of Financial Guaranty was approximately
$744,722,000. Copies of Financial Guaranty's financial statements, prepared on
the basis of statutory accounting principles, and the Corporation's financial
statements, prepared on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles,
may be obtained by writing to Financial Guaranty at 115 Broadway, New York,
New York 10006, Attention: Communications Department, telephone number: (212)
312-3000 or to the New York State Insurance Department at 160 West Broadway,
18th Floor, New York, New York 10013, Attention: Property Companies Bureau,
telephone number: (212) 621-0389.
In addition, Financial Guaranty Insurance Company is currently licensed
to write insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. ("Financial Security" or "FSA") is a
monoline insurance company incorporated on March 16, 1984 under the laws of
the State of New York. The operations of Financial Security commenced on July
25, 1985, and Financial Security received its New York State insurance license
on September 23, 1985. Financial Security and its two wholly owned
subsidiaries are licensed to engage in the financial guaranty insurance
business in 49 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
Financial Security and its subsidiaries are engaged exclusively in the
business of writing financial guaranty insurance, principally in respect of
asset-backed and other collateralized securities offered in domestic and
foreign markets. Financial Security and its subsidiaries also write financial
guaranty insurance in respect of municipal and other obligations and reinsure
financial guaranty insurance policies written by other leading insurance
companies. In general, financial guaranty insurance consists of the issuance
of a guaranty of scheduled payments of an issuer's securities, thereby
enhancing the credit rating of those securities, in consideration for payment
of a premium to the insurer.
Financial Security is approximately 91.6% owned by U S WEST, Inc. and
8.4% owned by The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. ("Tokio Marine").
Neither U S WEST, Inc. nor Tokio Marine is obligated to pay the debts of or
the claims against Financial Security. Financial Security is domiciled in the
State of New York and is subject to regulation by the State of New York
Insurance Department. As of September 30, 1992, the total policyholders'
surplus and contingency reserves and the total unearned premium reserve,
respectively, of Financial Security and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, approximately
$456,840,000 (unaudited) and $231,686,000 (unaudited), and the total
shareholders' equity and the total unearned premium reserve, respectively, of
Financial Security and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, approximately $615,376,000
(unaudited) and $213,838,000 (unaudited). Copies of Financial Security's
financial statements may be obtained by writing to Financial Security at 350
Park Avenue, New York, New York, 10022, Attention: Communications Department.
Its telephone number is (212) 826-0100.
Pursuant to an intercompany agreement, liabilities on financial guaranty
insurance written by Financial Security or either of its subsidiaries are
reinsured among such companies on an agreed-upon percentage substantially
proportional to their respective capital, surplus and reserves, subject to
applicable statutory risk limitations. In addition, Financial Security
reinsures a portion of its liabilities under certain of its financial guaranty
insurance policies with unaffiliated reinsurers under various quota share
treaties and on a transaction-by-transaction basis. Such reinsurance is
utilized by Financial Security as a risk management device and to comply with
certain statutory and rating agency requirements; it does not alter or limit
Financial Security's obligations under any financial guaranty insurance
policy.
<PAGE>
24 Unitholder Explanations
Financial Security's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa" by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc., and "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation, Nippon
Investors Service Inc., Duff & Phelps Inc. and Australian Ratings Pty. Ltd.
Such ratings reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies, are not
recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
Capital Guaranty Insurance Company ("Capital Guaranty") was incorporated
in Maryland on June 25, 1986, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital
Guaranty Corporation, a Maryland insurance holding company.
Capital Guaranty Corporation is owned by the following investors:
Constellation Investments, Inc., an affiliate of Baltimore Gas and Electric;
Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc.; Safeco Corporation; Sibag Finance
Corporation, an affiliate of Siemens A.G.; and United States Fidelity and
Guaranty Company and management.
Capital Guaranty, headquartered in San Francisco, is a monoline financial
guaranty insurer engaged in the underwriting and development of financial
guaranty insurance. Capital Guaranty insures general obligation, tax supported
and revenue bonds structured as tax-exempt and taxable securities as well as
selectively insures taxable corporate/asset backed securities. Standard &
Poor's Corporation rates the claims paying ability of Capital Guaranty "AAA."
Capital Guaranty's insured portfolio currently includes over $9 billion
in total principal and interest insured. As of September 30, 1992, the total
policyholders' surplus of Capital Guaranty was approximately $113,000,000
(unaudited), and the total admitted assets were approximately $220,000,000
(unaudited) as reported to the Insurance Department of the State of Maryland.
Financial statements for Capital Guaranty Insurance Company, that have been
prepared in accordance with statutory insurance accounting standards, are
available upon request. The address of Capital Guaranty's headquarters and its
telephone number are Steuart Tower, 22nd Floor, One Market Plaza, San
Francisco, CA 94105-1413 and (415) 995-8000.
CapMAC is a New York-domiciled monoline stock insurance company which
engages only in the business of financial guarantee and surety insurance.
CapMAC is licensed in 48 states in addition to the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the territory of Guam. CapMAC insures
structured asset-backed, corporate and other financial obligations in the
domestic and foreign capital markets. CapMAC may also provide financial
guarantee reinsurance for structured asset-backed, corporate and municipal
obligations written by other major insurance companies.
CapMAC's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa" by Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. ("Moody's"), "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation ("Standard &
Poor's"), and "AAA" by Duff & Phelps, Inc. ("Duff & Phelps"). Such ratings
reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies, are not
recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
CapMAC is wholly owned by CapMAC Holdings Inc. ("Holdings"), a company
that is owned by a group of institutional and other investors, including
CapMAC's management and employees. CapMAC commenced operations on December 24,
1987 as an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Citibank (New York State), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Citicorp. On June 25, 1992, Citibank (New York
State) sold CapMAC to Holdings (the "Sale").
Neither Holdings nor any of its stockholders is obligated to pay any
claims under any surety bond issued by CapMAC or any debts of CapMAC or to
make additional capital contributions.
CapMAC is regulated by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of
New York. In addition, CapMAC is subject to regulation by the insurance
departments of the other jurisdictions in which it is licensed. CapMAC is
subject to periodic regulatory examinations by the same regulatory
authorities.
CapMAC is bound by insurance laws and regulations regarding capital
transfers, limitations upon dividends, investment of assets, changes in
control, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and acquisitions. The
amount of exposure per risk that CapMAC may retain, after giving effect to
reinsurance, collateral or other security, is also regulated. Statutory and
regulatory accounting practices may prescribe appropriate rates at which
premiums are earned and the levels of reserves required. In addition, various
insurance laws restrict the incurrence of debt, regulate permissible
investments of reserves, capital and surplus, and govern the form of surety
bonds.
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 25
CapMAC's obligations under the Surety Bond(s) may be reinsured. Such
reinsurance does not relieve CapMAC of any of its obligations under the Surety
Bond(s).
THE SURETY BONDS ARE NOT COVERED BY THE PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE
SECURITY FUND SPECIFIED IN ARTICLE 76 OF THE NEW YORK INSURANCE LAW.
In connection with the Sale, Holdings and CapMAC entered into an
Ownership Policy Agreement (the "Ownership Policy Agreement"), which sets
forth Holdings' intent with respect to its ownership and control of CapMAC and
provides for certain policies and agreements with respect to Holdings'
exercise of its control of CapMAC. In the Ownership Policy Agreement, Holdings
has agreed that, during the term of the Ownership Policy Agreement, it will
not, and will not permit any stockholder of Holdings to enter into any
transaction the result of which would be a change of control (as defined in
the Ownership Policy Agreement) of CapMAC, unless the long term debt
obligations or claims-paying ability of the person which would control CapMAC
after such transaction or its direct or indirect parent are rated in a high
investment grade category, unless Holdings or CapMAC has confirmed that
CapMAC's claims-paying ability rating by Moody's (the "Rating") in effect
immediately prior to any such change of control will not be downgraded by
Moody's upon such change of control or unless such change of control occurs as
a result of a public offering of Holdings' capital stock.
In addition, the Ownership Policy Agreement includes agreements (i) not
to change the "zero-loss" underwriting standards or policies and procedures of
CapMAC in a manner that would materially and adversely affect the risk profile
of CapMAC's book of business, (ii) that CapMAC will adhere to the aggregate
leverage limitations and maintain capitalization levels considered by Moody's
from time to time as consistent with maintaining CapMAC's Rating and (iii)
that until CapMAC's statutory capital surplus and contingency reserve
("qualified statutory capital") equal $250 million, CapMAC will maintain a
specified amount of qualified statutory capital in excess of the amount of
qualified statutory capital that CapMAC is required at such time to maintain
under the aggregate leverage limitations set forth in Article 69 of the New
York Insurance Law.
The Ownership Policy Agreement will terminate on the earlier of the date
on which a change of control of CapMAC occurs and the date on which CapMAC and
Holdings agree in writing to terminate the Ownership Policy Agreement;
provided that, CapMAC or Holdings has confirmed that CapMAC's Rating in effect
immediately prior to any such termination will not be downgraded upon such
termination.
As of December 31, 1992 and 1991, CapMAC had statutory capital and
surplus of approximately $148 million and $232 million, respectively, and had
not incurred any debt obligations. On June 26, 1992, CapMAC made a special
distribution (the "Distribution") to Holdings in connection with the Sale in
an aggregate amount that caused the total of CapMAC's statutory capital and
surplus to decline to approximately $150 million. Holdings applied
substantially all of the proceeds of the Distribution to repay debt owed to
Citicorp that was incurred in connection with the capitalization of CapMAC. As
of June 30, 1992, CapMAC had statutory capital and surplus of approximately
$150 million and had not incurred any debt obligations. In addition, at
December 31, 1992 CapMAC had a statutory contingency reserve of approximately
$15 million, which is also available to cover claims under surety bonds issued
by CapMAC. Article 69 of the New York State Insurance Law requires that CapMAC
establishes and maintains the contingency reserve.
In addition to its capital (including contingency reserve) and other
reinsurance available to pay claims under its surety bonds, on June 25, 1992,
CapMAC entered into a Stop Loss Reinsurance Agreement (the "Stop Loss
Agreement") with Winterthur Swiss Insurance Company (the "Reinsurer"), which
is rated AAA by Standard & Poor's and Aaa by Moody's, pursuant to which the
Reinsurer will be required to pay any losses incurred by CapMAC during the
term of the Stop Loss Agreement on the surety bonds covered under the Stop
Loss Agreement in excess of a specified amount of losses incurred by CapMAC
under such surety bonds (such specified amount initially being $100 million
and increasing annually by an amount equal to 66 2/3% of the increase in
CapMAC's statutory capital and surplus) up to an aggregate limit payable under
the Stop Loss Agreement of $50 million. The Stop Loss Agreement has an initial
term of seven years, is extendable for one-year periods and is subject to
early termination upon the occurrence of certain events.
<PAGE>
26 Unitholder Explanations
CapMAC also has available a $100,000,000 standby corporate liquidity
facility (the "Liquidity Facility") provided by a syndicate of banks rated
A1+/P1 by Standard & Poor's and Moody's, respectively, having a term of 360
days. Under the Liquidity Facility CapMAC will be able, subject to satisfying
certain conditions, to borrow funds from time to time in order to enable it to
fund any claim payments or payments made in settlement or mitigation of claims
payments under its surety bonds, including the Surety Bond(s).
Copies of CapMAC's financial statements prepared in accordance with
statutory accounting standards, which differ from generally accepted
accounting principles, and filed with the Insurance Department of the State of
New York are available upon request. CapMAC is located at 885 Third Avenue,
New York, New York 10022, and its telephone number is (212) 755-1155.
In order to be in an Insured Trust, Bonds must be insured by one of the
Preinsured Bond Insurers or be eligible for the insurance being obtained by
such Trust. In determining eligibility for insurance, the Preinsured Bond
Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and Financial Guaranty have applied their own
standards which correspond generally to the standards they normally use in
establishing the insurability of new issues of municipal bonds and which are
not necessarily the criteria used in the selection of Bonds by the Sponsor. To
the extent the standards of the Preinsured Bond Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and
Financial Guaranty are more restrictive than those of the Sponsor, the
previously stated Trust investment criteria have been limited with respect to
the Bonds. This decision is made prior to the Date of Deposit, as debt
obligations not eligible for insurance are not deposited in an Insured Trust.
Thus, all of the Bonds in the portfolios of the Insured Trusts in the Fund are
insured either by the respective Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds, by a
prior owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Bonds
in a Trust.
Because the Bonds are insured by one of the Portfolio Insurers or one of
the Preinsured Bond Insurers as to the timely payment of principal and
interest, when due, and on the basis of the various reinsurance agreements in
effect, Standard & Poor's Corporation has assigned to the Units of each
Insured Trust its "AAA" investment rating. See "Description of Securities
Ratings". The obtaining of this rating by an Insured Trust should not be
construed as an approval of the offering of the Units by Standard & Poor's
Corporation or as a guarantee of the market value of such Trust or of the
Units.
On the date of this Prospectus, the Estimated Current Returns on the
Securities in the IM-IT and New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity
Trust were 5.08% and 4.04%, respectively, after payment of the insurance
premium or premiums payable by each Trust, while the Estimated Long-Term
Returns on such Trusts were 5.10% and 4.11%, respectively. The Estimated
Current Returns on identical portfolios without the insurance obtained by the
above-mentioned Trusts would have been 5.09% and 4.05%, respectively, on such
date, while the Estimated Long-Term Returns on identical portfolios without
the insurance obtained by the above mentioned Trusts would have been 5.11%
and 4.13%, respectively.
An objective of portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is to
obtain a higher yield on the portfolio of such Trust than would be available
if all the Securities in such portfolio had Standard & Poor's Corporation
"AAA" rating and yet at the same time to have the protection of insurance of
prompt payment of interest and principal, when due, on the Bonds. There is, of
course, no certainty that this result will be achieved. Preinsured Bonds in an
Insured Trust (all of which are rated "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation)
may or may not have a higher yield than uninsured bonds rated "AAA" by
Standard & Poor's Corporation. In selecting such Bonds for an Insured Trust,
the Sponsor has applied the criteria hereinbefore described.
In the event of nonpayment of interest or principal, when due, in respect
of a Bond, AMBAC Indemnity shall make such payment not later than 30 days and
Financial Guaranty shall make such payment within one business day after the
respective insurer has been notified that such nonpayment has occurred or is
threatened (but not earlier than the date such payment is due). The insurer,
as regards any payment it may make, will succeed to the rights of the Trustee
in respect thereof. All policies issued by the Portfolio Insurers and the
Preinsured Bond Insurers are substantially identical insofar as obligations to
an Insured Trust are concerned.
The Internal Revenue Service has issued a letter ruling which holds in
effect that insurance proceeds representing maturing interest on defaulted
municipal obligations paid to holders of insured bonds, under policy
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 27
provisions substantially identical to the policies described herein, will be
excludable from Federal gross income under Section 103(a)(1) of the Internal
Revenue Code to the same extent as if such payments were made by the issuer of
the municipal obligations. Holders of Units in an Insured Trust should discuss
with their tax advisers the degree of reliance which they may place on this
letter ruling. However, Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, has given
an opinion to the effect such payment of proceeds would be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations. See
"Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
Each Portfolio Insurer is subject to regulation by the department of
insurance in the state in which it is qualified to do business. Such
regulation, however, is no guarantee that each Portfolio Insurer will be able
to perform on its contract of insurance in the event a claim should be made
thereunder at some time in the future. At the date hereof, it is reported that
no claims have been submitted or are expected to be submitted to any of the
Portfolio Insurers which would materially impair the ability of any such
company to meet its commitment pursuant to any contract of bond or portfolio
insurance.
The information relating to each Portfolio Insurer has been furnished by
such companies. The financial information with respect to each Portfolio
Insurer appears in reports filed with state insurance regulatory authorities
and is subject to audit and review by such authorities. No representation is
made herein as to the accuracy or adequacy of such information or as to the
absence of material adverse changes in such information subsequent to the
dates thereof.
The Bonds in the Insured Trusts are insured as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BONDS INSURED BONDS INSURED
UNDER AMBAC UNDER FINANCIAL
INDEMNITY GUARANTY PREINSURED
TRUST PORTFOLIO INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INSURANCE BONDS TOTAL
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT............................................... 6% 0% 94% 100%
IM-IT Limited Maturity.............................. 0% 0% 100% 100%
Michigan IM-IT...................................... 0% 0% 100% 100%
New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity.................................. 8% 0% 92% 100%
Pennsylvania IM-IT.................................. 0% 0% 100% 100%
</TABLE>
The breakdown of the Preinsured Bonds is as follows: IM-IT--AMBAC
Indemnity 10%, Financial Guaranty 31%, MBIA 28% and FSA 25%; IM-IT Limited
Maturity Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 39%, Financial Guaranty 11%, MBIA 27% and FSA
23%; Michigan IM-IT Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 65%, Financial Guaranty 14%, MBIA
4% and FSA 17%; New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust--AMBAC
Indemnity 4%, Financial Guaranty 3%, MBIA 61% and FSA 24%; Pennsylvania IM-IT
Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 14%, Financial Guaranty 41%, MBIA 34% and FSA 11%.
<PAGE>
28 IM-IT-- Series 314
IM-IT
GENERAL. The IM-IT consists of 14 issues of Securities. Four of the
Bonds in the IM-IT are general obligations of the governmental entities
issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof. The remaining issues
are payable from the income of a specific project or authority and are not
supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These issues are located in 10
states or territories, divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of
principal amount to total IM-IT) as follows: General Obligations, 4 (22%);
Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue, 3 (22%); Health Care, 3 (20%); General Purpose,
1 (10%); Industrial Revenue, 1 (10%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (10%) and Public
Building, 1 (6%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating. The dollar
weighted average maturity of the Bonds in the Trust is 28 years.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on IM-IT Units, see "Other Matters-- Federal Tax Status".
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
<S> <C>
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME <F1>
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 52.65
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>............................................................. $ 1.75
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... $ .06
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 50.84
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 50.84
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.24
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .14123
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F3><F4><F5>....................................... 5.08%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F3><F4><F5>........................................................................ 5.10%
Initial Distribution (February 1994)........................................................................... $ 2.54
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F5>.................................................................... $ 4.24
PURCHASED INTEREST <F6>........................................................................................ $ 6.81
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>..............$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates...........FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES.....................FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
FEBRUARY 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately
$.05 per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit
prior to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued"
Bonds included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such
amount, the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the
first year, the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above.
Estimated annual interest income per Unit will be increased to $52.70.
Estimated Annual Expense per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased
to $1.80; and estimated net annual interest income per Unit will remain
the same as shown. See "Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term
Returns." Based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities as of
the Date of Deposit, the Trustee's annual fee would be $9,673.
<F2> Excluding insurance costs.
<F3> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F5> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F6> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
IM-IT-- Series 314 29
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 314 (152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO AS OF JANUARY 6, 1994
<CAPTION>
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND OFFERING
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION PRICE TO
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> IM-IT<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 1,000,000 Brazoria County, Texas, Health Facilities Development
Corporation, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Brazosport
Memorial Hospital) Series 1993 (FSA Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 7/1/2013.......................................... AAA 2004 @ 100 S.F. $ 992,040
1,000,000 North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power System
Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 1993B (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 100
#5.50% Due 1/1/2017.......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 988,330
500,000 City of Carbondale, Jackson County, Illinois, General
Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 102
5.65% Due 12/1/2018.......................................... AAA 2010 @ 100 S.F. 504,610
400,000 Okemos Public Schools, County of Ingham, State of Michigan,
1993 Refunding Bonds (Unlimited Tax-General Obligation) MBIA
Insured
#0.00% Due 5/1/2020.......................................... AAA 92,796<F6>
105,000 Romulus Community School District, Wayne County, Michigan,
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 (FGIC
Insured)
#0.00% Due 5/1/2020.......................................... AAA 24,359<F6>
300,000 Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Hospital Facilities Revenue Refunding
Bonds, St. Luke's Methodist Hospital Project (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.75% Due 8/15/2022......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 304,008
1,125,000 City of Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds (Emergency
Telephone System) Series 1993 (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.625% Due 1/1/2023......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 1,133,460
700,000 Wisconsin State Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother, Corp.) Series
1993C (MBIA Insured)** 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 8/15/2023......................................... AAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 688,450
675,000 Avondale Housing, Inc. (Indiana) Multifamily Mortgage Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 1993C (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan-
Avondale Phase II Apartments Project) MBIA Insured 2004 @ 100
6.00% Due 9/1/2023........................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 693,745
1,000,000 Emery County, Utah, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds
(PacifiCorp Projects) Series 1993A (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
5.65% Due 11/1/2023.......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 1,009,180
1,000,000 Brown Street Housing Development Corporation of Jackson,
Mississippi, Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (FHA Insured
Mortgage Loan-North Hills Apartments, Section 8 Assisted
Project) Series 1993A (MBIA Insured) 2003 @ 100
#5.65% Due 1/1/2024.......................................... AAA 2006 @ 100 S.F. 997,830
500,000 Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, Multi-Family
Mortgage Revenue Bonds (National Center for Housing
Management Project) FSA Insured 2004 @ 102
5.80% Due 1/1/2024........................................... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 506,780
565,000 Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority (Illinois) McCormick
Place Expansion Project Bonds, Series 1992A 2003 @ 102
#6.50% Due 6/15/2027......................................... A+ 2023 @ 100 S.F. 602,917
1,000,000 The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles,
California (Bunker Hill Redevelopment Project) Tax Allocation
Refunding Bonds, Series H (FSA Insured) 2003 @ 102
5.60% Due 12/1/2028.......................................... AAA 2024 @ 100 S.F. 1,005,000
$ 9,870,000 $ 9,543,505
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured either by one of the Preinsured
Bond Insurers (as indicated in the Bond name) or under the portfolio insurance
policy obtained by the Trust from AMBAC Indemnity. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
30 IM-IT-- 72nd Limited Maturity Series
IM-IT LIMITED MATURITY TRUST
GENERAL. The IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust consists of 12 issues of
Securities. Four of the Bonds in the IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust are general
obligations of the governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the
taxing power thereof. The remaining issues are payable from the income of a
specific project or authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to
levy taxes. These issues are located in 10 states or territories, divided by
purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to total IM-IT Limited
Maturity Trust) as follows: Health Care, 4 (30%); General Obligations, 4
(29%); Water and Sewer, 1 (15%); General Purpose, 1 (12%); Multi-Family
Mortgage Revenue, 1 (10%) and Public Building, 1 (4%). Three bond issues
aggregating approximately 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the
Securities in the Trust are obligations of issuers located in the State of
Michigan. No Bond issue has received a provisional rating. All of the
obligations in the IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust mature approximately within
12-15 years of the Date of Deposit. The dollar weighted average maturity of
the Bonds in the Trust is 14.3 years.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax
Status".
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
<S> <C>
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 49.69
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>............................................................. $ 1.93
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 47.76
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 47.76
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 3.98
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .13265
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F2><F3><F4>........................................... 4.65%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F2><F3><F4>........................................................................ 4.76%
Initial Distribution (February 1994)........................................................................... $ 2.39
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F4>.................................................................... $ 3.98
PURCHASED INTEREST <F5>........................................................................................ $ 8.28
Trustee's Annual Fee...................$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates...........FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES.....................FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
FEBRUARY 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> Excluding Insurance costs.
<F2> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F4> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F5> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
IM-IT-- 72nd Limited Maturity Series 31
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
72ND LIMITED MATURITY SERIES (152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO AS OF JANUARY 6, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND IM-IT LIMITED
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION MATURITY
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Limited
Obligation Revenue Bonds (Walled Lake Villa Project) Series
1993 (FSA Insured) 2004 @ 103
5.85% Due 4/15/2007.......................................... AAA 2005 @ 100 S.F. $ 528,405
230,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 1993 (The University of Chicago Hospitals Project)
MBIA Insured
5.50% Due 8/15/2007.......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 236,084
750,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue and
Refunding Bonds (The Detroit Medical Center Obligated Group)
Series 1993B (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
#200M--5.10% Due 8/15/2007................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 199,056
#550M--5.20% Due 8/15/2008................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 549,939
250,000 Kyrene Elementary School District No.28, Maricopa County,
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1993C (FGIC
Insured)
#0.00% Due 1/1/2008.......................................... AAA 120,620<F6>
625,000 Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky, Government Public
Facilities Corporation, Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (FSA
Insured)
#4.50% Due 2/1/2008.......................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 581,913
300,000 Kansas City, Missouri, School District Building Elementary
School Project, General Obligation Bonds, Series D (FGIC
Insured)
#5.15% Due 2/1/2008.......................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 300,006
180,000 Lockhart Correctional Facilities Financing Corporation, Texas,
Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (MBIA Insured)
#5.25% Due 4/1/2008.......................................... AAA 2003 @ 100 180,900
450,000 Franklin Township, Marion County, Indiana, Multiple School
Building Corporation, Refunding 1st Mortgage General
Obligation Bonds, Series 1993 (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
5.65% Due 7/1/2008........................................... AAA 469,876
500,000 Wisconsin State Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother Corp.) Series
1993D (MBIA Insured)
#5.15% Due 8/15/2008......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 494,915
465,000 Town of Hermon, Maine, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1993
(MBIA Insured)
5.40% Due 11/1/2008.......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 474,072
750,000 Spokane, Washington, Regional Solid Waste Management System
Revenue Refunding Bonds (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
5.125% Due 12/1/2008......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 744,098
$ 4,879,884
$ 5,000,000
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
32 Michigan IM-IT-- Series 112
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST
GENERAL. The Michigan IM-IT Trust consists of 9 issues of Securities.
Four of the Bonds in the Michigan IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Michigan IM-IT Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 4 (41%); Health
Care, 3 (27%); Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue, 1 (18%) and Single Family
Mortgage Revenue, 1 (14%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS. Investors should be aware that the economy of the
State of Michigan has, in the past, proven to be cyclical, due primarily to
the fact that the leading sector of the State's economy is the manufacturing
of durable goods. While the State's efforts to diversify its economy have
proven successful, as reflected by the fact that the share of employment in
the State in the durable goods sector has fallen from 33.1 percent in 1960 to
17.9 percent in 1990, durable goods manufacturing still represents a sizable
portion of the State's economy. As a result, any substantial national economic
downturn is likely to have an adverse effect on the economy of the State and
on the revenues of the State and some of its local governmental units.
In May 1986, Moody's Investors Service raised the State's general
obligation bond rating to "A1". In October 1989, Standard & Poor's Corporation
raised its rating on the State's general obligation bonds to "AA".
The State's economy could continue to be affected by changes in the auto
industry, notably consolidation and plant closings resulting from competitive
pressures and over-capacity. Such actions could adversely affect State
revenues and the financial impact on the local units of government in the
areas in which plants are closed could be more severe.
General Motors Corporation has announced the scheduled closing of several
of its plants in Michigan in 1993 and 1994. The impact these closures will
have on the State's revenues and expenditures is not currently known. The
impact on the financial condition of the municipalities in which the plants
are located may be more severe than the impact on the State itself.
In recent years, the State has reported its financial results in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For each of the five
fiscal years ending with the fiscal year ended September 30, 1989, the State
reported positive year-end General Fund balances and positive cash balances in
the combined General Fund/School Aid Fund. For the fiscal years ending
September 30, 1990 and 1991, the State reported negative year-end General Fund
Balances of $310.4 million and $169.4 million, respectively, but ended the
1992 fiscal year with its general fund in balance. In the 1993 fiscal year,
the State took actions to eliminate a projected year-end general fund deficit
of $370 million, but the fund Financial Reports for the 1993 year have not yet
been released. A positive cash balance in the combined General Fund/School Aid
Fund was recorded at September 30, 1990. Since 1991 the State has experienced
deteriorating cash balances which have necessitated short term borrowing and
the deferral of certain scheduled cash payments. The State borrowed $900
million for cash flow purposes in the 1993 fiscal year. The State's Budget
Stabilization Fund was nearly depleted with a $168 million transfer to the
General Fund for the 1992 State fiscal year.
The Michigan Constitution of 1963 limits the amount of total revenues of
the State raised from taxes and certain other sources to a level for each
fiscal year equal to a percentage of the State's personal income for the prior
calendar year. In the event that the State's total revenues exceeds the limit
by 1 percent or more, the Michigan Constitution of 1963 requires that the
excess be refunded to taxpayers.
In December, 1993, the Michigan Legislature adopted school finance
reform legislation poviding, among other things, for submission of a ballot
proposal on March 15, 1994, to amend the State's constitution to increase
the State sales tax rate from 4% to 6% and to place a cap on property
assessment increases for all property taxes. The legislation further provides
that if the constitutional amendment is accepted by the State's voters, the
State's income tax rate will be cut from 4.6% to 4.4%, while if the proposal
is rejected, the income tax rate will be increased to 6%. In either case,
some property taxes will be reduced and school funding will be provided from
a combination of property taxes and state revenues, some of which will be
provided from new or increased State taxes. The legislation also contains
<PAGE>
Michigan IM-IT-- Series 112 33
other proposals that may reduce or alter the revenues of local units of
government, and tax increment bonds could be particularly affected. While
the ultimate impact of the poroposed constitutional amendment and related
legislation cannot yet be accurately predicted, investors should be alert
to the potential effect of such measures upon the operations and revenues
of Michigan local units of government.
Although all or most of the Bonds in the Michigan IM-IT Trust are revenue
obligations or general obligations of local governments or authorities rather
than general obligations of the State of Michigan itself, there can be no
assurance that any financial difficulties the State may experience will not
adversely affect the market value or marketability of the Bonds or the ability
of the respective obligors to pay interest on or principal of the Bonds,
particularly in view of the dependency of local governments and other
authorities upon State aid and reimbursement programs and, in the case of
bonds issued by the State Building Authority, the dependency of the State
Building Authority on the receipt of rental payments from the State to meet
debt service requirements upon such bonds. In the 1991 fiscal year, the State
deferred certain scheduled cash payments to municipalities, school districts,
universities and community colleges. While such deferrals were made up at
specified later dates, similar future deferrals could have an adverse impact
on the cash position of some local governmental units. Additionally, the State
reduced revenue sharing payments to municipalities below that level provided
under formulas by $10.9 million in the 1991 fiscal year and $34.4 million in
the 1992 fiscal year and froze the 1993 revenue sharing payments at the 1992
level.
The Michigan IM-IT Trust may contain general obligation bonds of local
units of government pledging the full faith and credit of the local unit which
are payable from the levy of ad valorem taxes on taxable property within the
jurisdiction of the local unit. Such bonds issued prior to December 22, 1978,
or issued after December 22, 1978 with the approval of the electors of the
local unit, are payable from property taxes levied without limitation as to
rate or amount. With respect to bonds issued after December 22, 1978, and
which were not approved by the electors of the local unit, the tax levy of the
local unit for debt service purposes is subject to constitutional, statutory
and charter tax rate limitations. In addition, several major industrial
corporations have instituted challenges of their ad valorem property tax
assessments in a number of local municipal units in the State. If successful,
such challenges could have an adverse impact on the ad valorem tax bases of
such units which could adversely affect their abiltiy to raise funds for
operation and debt service requirements.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on Michigan IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, special counsel to
the Fund for Michigan tax matters, under existing Michigan law:
The Michigan IM-IT Trust and the owners of Units will be treated for
purposes of the Michigan income tax laws and the Single Business Tax in
substantially the same manner as they are for purposes of the Federal income
tax laws, as currently enacted. Accordingly, we have relied upon the opinion
of Messrs. Chapman and Cutler as to the applicability of Federal income tax
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to the Michigan IM-IT Trust and the
Holders of Units.
Under the income tax laws of the State of Michigan, the Michigan IM-IT
Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation; the income of the
Michigan IM-IT Trust will be treated as the income of the Unitholders and be
deemed to have been received by them when received by the Michigan IM-IT
Trust. Interest on the underlying Bonds which is exempt from tax under these
laws when received by Michigan IM-IT Trust will retain its status as tax
exempt interest to the Unitholders.
For purposes of the foregoing Michigan tax laws, each Unitholder will be
considered to have received his pro rata share of Bond interest when it is
received by the Michigan IM-IT Trust, and each Unitholder will have a taxable
event when the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes of a Bond (whether by sale,
exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or when the Unitholder redeems or
sells his Certificate to the extent the transaction constitutes a taxable
event for Federal income tax purposes. The tax cost of each unit to a
Unitholder will be established and allocated for purposes of these Michigan
tax laws in the same manner as such cost is established and allocated for
Federal income tax purposes.
<PAGE>
34 Michigan IM-IT-- Series 112
Under the Michigan Intangibles Tax, the Michigan IM-IT Trust is not
taxable and the pro rata ownership of the underlying Bonds, as well as the
interest thereon, will be exempt to the Unitholders to the extent the Michigan
IM-IT Trust consists of obligations of the State of Michigan or its political
subdivisions or municipalities, or of obligations of possessions of the United
States.
The Michigan Single Business Tax replaced the tax on corporate and
financial institution income under the Michigan Income Tax, and the Intangible
Tax with respect to those intangibles of persons subject to the Single
Business Tax the income from which would be considered in computing the Single
Business Tax. Persons are subject to the Single Business Tax only if they are
engaged in "business activity", as defined in the Act. Under the Single
Business Tax, both interest received by the Michigan IM-IT Trust on the
underlying Bonds and any amount distributed from the Michigan IM-IT Trust to a
Unitholder, if not included in determining taxable income for Federal income
tax purposes, is also not included in the adjusted tax base upon which the
Single Business Tax is computed, of either the Michigan IM-IT Trust or the
Unitholders. If the Michigan IM-IT Trust or the Unitholders have a taxable
event for Federal income tax purposes when the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes
of a Bond (whether by sale, exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or
the Unitholder redeems or sells his Certificate, an amount equal to any gain
realized from such taxable event which was included in the computation of
taxable income for Federal income tax purposes (plus an amount equal to any
capital gain of an individual realized in connection with such event but
excluded in computing that individual's Federal taxable income) will be
included in the tax base against which, after allocation, apportionment and
other adjustments, the Single Business Tax is computed. The tax base will be
reduced by an amount equal to any capital loss realized from such a taxable
event, whether or not the capital loss was deducted in computing Federal
taxable income in the year the loss occurred. Unitholders should consult their
tax advisor as to their status under Michigan law.
Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy issued to the Trustee of the
Trust, or paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of Bonds, which,
when received by the Unitholders, represent maturing interest on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee, will be excludable from the Michigan income
tax laws and the Single Business Tax if, and to the same extent as, such
interest would have been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted
obligations. While treatment under the Michigan Intangibles Tax is not
premised upon the characterization of such proceeds under the Internal Revenue
Code, the Michigan Department of Treasury should adopt the same approach as
under the Michigan income tax laws and the Single Business Tax.
As the Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminates the capital gain deduction for
tax years beginning after December 31, 1986, the federal adjusted gross
income, the computation base for the Michigan Income Tax, of a Unitholder will
be increased accordingly to the extent such capital gains are realized when
the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes of a Bond or when the Unitholder redeems or
sells a Unit, to the extent such transaction constitutes a taxable event for
Federal income tax purposes.
<PAGE>
Michigan IM-IT-- Series 112 35
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
<S> <C>
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 50.96
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>............................................................. $ 1.94
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 49.02
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 49.02
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.09
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .13616
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F2><F3><F4>........................................... 4.90%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F2><F3><F4>........................................................................ 4.93%
Initial Distribution (February 1994)........................................................................... $ 2.45
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F4>.................................................................... $ 4.09
PURCHASED INTEREST <F5>........................................................................................ $ 8.49
Trustee's Annual Fee...................$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates...........FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES.................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
FEBRUARY 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> Excluding Insurance costs.
<F2> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F4> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F5> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
36 Michigan IM-IT-- Series 112
<TABLE>
MICHIGAN INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 112 (152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO AS OF JANUARY 6, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND MICHIGAN
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION IM-IT
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 165,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Oakwood Hospital Obligated Group) Series
1993A (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 11/1/2013......................................... AAA 2009 @ 100 S.F. $ 166,523
650,000 Hospital Finance Authority of the City of St. Joseph (Michigan)
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Mercy Memorial Medical Center
Obligated Group) Series 1993 (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2004 @ 102
#5.25% Due 1/1/2016.......................................... AAA 2010 @ 100 S.F. 635,076
500,000 Plymouth-Canton Community Schools, Counties of Wayne and
Washtenaw, State of Michigan (General Obligation-Unlimited
Tax) 1993 Refunding Bonds (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 5/1/2017.......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 505,365
500,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Rental Housing
Revenue Bonds, Series 1993A (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2003 @ 102
5.875% Due 10/1/2017......................................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 515,885
150,000 Oakland Community College, Michigan, 1993 Community College
Improvement and Refunding Bonds (General Obligation-Limited
Tax) MBIA Insured 2003 @ 102
#5.25% Due 5/1/2018.......................................... AAA 2012 @ 100 S.F. 146,721
610,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Limited
Obligation Revenue Bonds (Breton Village Green Project)
Series 1993 (FSA Insured) 2003 @ 103
5.625% Due 10/15/2018........................................ AAA 2009 @ 100 S.F. 617,131
170,000 Huron Valley School District, Counties of Oakland and
Livingston, State of Michigan, 1993 Refunding Bonds (General
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) FGIC Insured
#0.00% Due 5/1/2019.......................................... AAA 42,196<F6>
600,000 Sandusky Community Schools, County of Sanilac, State of
Michigan (General Obligation-Unlimited Tax) Series 1994
Refunding Bonds (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2004 @ 102
#5.25% Due 5/1/2021.......................................... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 585,996
140,000 County of Jackson, Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital,
Jackson, Michigan) FGIC Insured 2003 @ 102
#5.25% Due 6/1/2023.......................................... AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 136,260
$ 3,351,153
$ 3,485,000
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9 37
NEW YORK IM-IT INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY TRUST
GENERAL. The New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust
consists of 16 issues of Securities. Two of the Bonds in the New York IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) as follows: Water
and Sewer, 4 (22%); Health Care, 2 (20%); Transportation, 2 (20%); Waste
Disposal, 2 (16%); Higher Education, 2 (11%); General Obligations, 2 (6%);
General Purpose, 1 (4%) and Public Building, 1 (1%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating. All of the obligations in the New York IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust mature within approximately 5-15 years of
the Date of Deposit. Commencing in approximately the fifth year, roughly 20%
of the Bonds in the Trust will mature each year. The dollar weighted average
maturity of the Bonds in the Trust is 8.41 years.
A resident of New York State (or New York City) will be subject to New
York State (or New York City) personal income tax with respect to gains
realized when New York Obligations held in the New York Insured Trust are
sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when his Units are sold or redeemed,
such gain will equal the proceeds of sale, redemption or payment less the tax
basis of the New York Obligation or Unit (adjusted to reflect (a) the
amortization of premium or discount, if any, on New York Obligations held in
the Trust, (b) accrued original issue discount, with respect to each New York
Obligation which, at the time the New York Obligation was issued had original
issue discount, and (c) the deposit of New York Obligations with accrued
interest in the Trust after the Unitholder's settlement date).
Interest or gain from the New York Insured Trust derived by a Unitholder
who is not a resident of New York State (or New York City) will not be subject
to New York State (or New York City) personal income tax, unless the Units are
property employed in a business, trade, profession or occupation carried on in
New York State (or New York City).
Amounts paid on defaulted New York Obligations held by the Trustee under
policies of insurance issued with respect to such New York Obligations will be
excludable from income for New York State and New York City income tax
purposes, if and to the same extent as, such interest would have been
excludable if paid by the respective issuer.
For purposes of the New York State and New York City franchise tax on
corporations, Unitholders which are subject to such tax will be required to
include in their entire net income any interest or gains distributed to them
even though distributed in respect of New York obligations.
If borrowed funds are used to purchase Units in the Trust, all (or part)
of the interest on such indebtedness will not be deductible for New York State
and New York City tax purposes. The purchase of Units may be considered to
have been made with borrowed funds even though such funds are not directly
traceable to the purchase of Units in any New York Trust.
The Portfolio of the New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust
includes obligations issued by New York State (the "State"), by its various
public bodies (the "Agencies"), and/or by other entities located within the
State, including the City of New York (the "City").
Some of the more significant events relating to the financial situation
in New York are summarized below. This section provides only a brief summary
of the complex factors affecting the financial situation in New York and is
based in part on Official Statements issued by, and on other information
reported by the State, the City and the Agencies in connection with the
issuance of their respective securities.
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local government finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of New York Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Trust or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
The State has historically been one of the wealthiest states in the
nation. For decades, however, the State economy has grown more slowly than
that of the nation as a whole, gradually eroding the State's relative economic
<PAGE>
38 New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9
affluence. Statewide, urban centers have experienced significant changes
involving migration of the more affluent to the suburbs and an influx of
generally less affluent residents. Regionally, the older Northeast cities have
suffered because of the relative success that the South and the West have had
in attracting people and business. The City has also had to face greater
competition as other major cities have developed financial and business
capabilities which make them less dependent on the specialized services
traditionally available almost exclusively in the City.
The State has for many years had a very high state and local tax burden
relative to other states. The burden of State and local taxation, in
combination with the many other causes of regional economic dislocation, has
contributed to the decisions of some businesses and individuals to relocate
outside, or not locate within, the State.
A national recession commenced in mid-1990. The downturn continued
throughout the State's 1990-91 fiscal year and was followed by a period of
weak economic growth during the 1991 calendar year. For calendar year 1992,
the national economy continued to recover, although at a rate below all
post-war recoveries. For calendar year 1993, the economy is expected to grow
faster than 1992, but still at a very moderate rate, as compared to other
recoveries. The national recession has been more severe in the State because
of factors such as a significant retrenchment in the financial services
industry, cutbacks in defense spending, and an overbuilt real estate market.
1993-94 Fiscal Year. On April 5, 1993, the State Legislature approved a
$32.08 billion budget. Following enactment of the budget the 1993-94 State
Financial Plan was formulated on April 16, 1993. This Plan projects General
Fund receipts and transfers from other funds at $32.367 billion and
disbursements and transfers to other funds at $32.300 billion. In comparison
to the Governor's recommended Executive Budget for the 1993-94 fiscal year, as
revised on February 18, 1993, the 1993-94 State Financial Plan reflects
increases in both receipts and disbursements in the General Fund of $811
million.
While a portion of the increased receipts was the result of a $487
million increase in the State's 1992-93 positive year-end margin at March 31,
1993 to $671 million, the balance of such increased receipts is based upon (i)
a projected $269 million increase in receipts resulting from improved 1992-93
results and the expectation of an improving economy, (ii) projected additional
payments of $200 million from the Federal government as reimbursements for
indigent medical care, (iii) the early payment of $50 million of personal tax
returns in 1992-93 which otherwise would have been paid in 1993-94; offset by
(iv) the State Legislature's failure to enact $195 million of additional
revenue-raising recommendations proposed by the Governor. There can be no
assurances that all of the projected receipts referred to above will be
received.
Despite the $811 million increase in disbursements included in the
1993-94 State Financial Plan, a reduction in aid to some local government
units can be expected. To offset a portion of such reductions, the 1993-94
State Financial Plan contains a package of mandate relief, cost containment
and other proposals to reduce the costs of many programs for which local
governments provide funding. There can be no assurance, however, that
localities that suffer cuts will not be adversely affected, leading to further
requests for State financial assistance.
There can be no assurance that the State will not face substantial
potential budget gaps in the future resulting from a significant disparity
between tax revenues projected from a lower recurring receipts base and the
spending required to maintain State programs at current levels. To address any
potential budgetary imbalance, the State may need to take significant actions
to align recurring receipts and disbursements.
1992-93 Fiscal Year. Before giving effect to a 1992-93 year-end deposit
to the refund reserve account of $671 million, General Fund receipts in
1992-93 would have been $716 million higher than originally projected. This
year-end deposit effectively reduced 1992-93 receipts by $671 million and made
those receipts available for 1993-94.
The State's favorable performance primarily resulted from income tax
collections that were $700 million higher than projected which reflected both
stronger economic activity and tax-induced one-time acceleration of income
into 1992. In other areas larger than projected business tax collections and
unbudgeted receipts offset the loss of $200 million of anticipated Federal
reimbursement and losses of, or shortfalls in, other projected revenue
sources.
For 1992-93, disbursements and transfers to other funds (including the
deposit to the refund reserve account discussed above) totalled $30.829
billion, an increase of $45 million above projections in April 1992.
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9 39
Fiscal year 1992-93 was the first time in four years that the State did
not incur a cash-basis operating deficit in the General Fund requiring the
issuance of deficit notes or other bonds, spending cuts or other revenue
raising measures.
Indebtedness. As of March 31, 1993, the total amount of long-term State
general obligation debt authorized but unissued stood at $2.4 billion. As of
the same date, the State had approximately $5.4 billion in general obligation
bonds. The State issued $850 million in tax and revenue anticipation notes
("TRANS") on April 28, 1993. The State does not project the need to issue
additional TRANS during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
The State projects that its borrrowings for capital purposes during the
State's 1993-94 fiscal year will consist of $460 million in general obligation
bonds and $140 million in new commercial paper issuances. In addition, the
State expects to issue $140 million in bonds for the purpose of redeeming
outstanding bond anticipation notes. The Legislature has authorized the
issuance of up to $85 million in certificates of participation during the
State's 1993-94 fiscal year for personal and real property acquisitions during
the State's 1993-94 fiscal year. The projection of the State regarding its
borrowings for the 1993-94 fiscal year may change if actual receipts fall
short of State projections or if other circumstances require.
In June 1990, legislation was enacted creating the "New York Local
Government Assistance Corporation" ("LGAC"), a public benefit corporation
empowered to issue long-term obligations to fund certain payments to local
governments traditionally funded through the State's annual seasonal
borrowing. To date, LGAC has issued its bonds to provide net proceeds of $3.28
billion. LGAC has been authorized to issue additional bonds to provide net
proceeds of $703 million during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
Ratings. The $850 million in TRANS issued by the State in April 1993 were
rated SP-1-Plus by S&P on April 26, 1993, and MIG-1 by Moody's on April 23,
1993, which represents the highest ratings given by such agencies and the
first time the State's TRANS have received these ratings since its May 1989
TRANS issuance. Both agencies cited the State's improved fiscal position as a
significant factor in the upgrading of the April 1993 TRANS.
Moody's rating of the State's general obligation bonds stood at A on
April 23, 1993, and S&P's rating stood at A-with a stable outlook on April 26,
1993, an improvement from S&P's negative outlook prior to April 1993.
Previously, Moody's lowered its rating to A on June 6, 1990, its rating having
been A1 since May 27, 1986. S&P lowered its rating from A to A-on January 13,
1992. S&P's previous ratings were A from March 1990 to January 1992, AA-from
August 1987 to March 1990 and A+ from November 1982 to August 1987.
Moody's, in confirming its rating of the State's general obligation
bonds, and S&P, in improving its outlook on such bonds from negative to
stable, noted the State's improved fiscal condition and reasonable revenue
assumptions contained in the 1993-94 State budget.
The City accounts for approximately 41% of the State's population and
personal income, and the City's financial health affects the State in numerous
ways.
In response to the City's fiscal crisis in 1975, the State took a number
of steps to assist the City in returning to fiscal stability. Among other
actions, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term
financing for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii)
created the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to review and
approve the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the financial
plans also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "Covered
Organizations")).
In February 1975, the New York State Urban Development Corporation
("UDC"), which had approximately $1 billion of outstanding debt, defaulted on
certain of its short-term notes. Shortly after the UDC default, the City
entered a period of financial crisis. Both the State Legislature and the
United States Congress enacted legislation in response to this crisis. During
1975, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term financing
for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii) created
the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to review and approve
the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the financial plans
also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "Covered
Organizations")).
Over the past three years, the rate of economic growth in the City has
slowed substantially, and the City's economy is currently in recession. The
City projects, and its current four-year financial plan assumes, a recovery
early
<PAGE>
40 New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9
in the 1993 calendar year. The Mayor is responsible for preparing the City's
four-year financial plan, including the City's current financial plan. The
City Comptroller has issued reports concluding that the recession of the
City's economy will be more severe and last longer than is assumed in the
financial plan.
Fiscal Year 1993 and 1993-1996 Financial Plan. The City's 1993 fiscal
year results are projected to be balanced in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The City was required to close
substantial budget gaps in its 1990, 1991 and 1992 fiscal years in order to
maintain balanced operating results.
The City's modified Financial Plan dated February 9, 1993 covering fiscal
years 1993-1996 projects budget gaps for 1994 through 1996. The Office of the
State Deputy Controller for the City of New York has estimated that under the
modified Financial Plan budget gaps will be $102 million for fiscal year 1994,
$196 million for fiscal year 1995 and $354 million for fiscal year 1996,
primarily due to anticipated higher spending on labor costs.
However, the City's modified Plan is dependent upon a gap-closing
program, certain elements of which the staff of Control Board identified on
March 25, 1993 to be at risk due to projected levels of State and Federal aid
and revenue and expenditures estimates which may not be achievable. The
Control Board indicated that the City's modified Financial Plan does not make
progress towards establishing a balanced budget process. The Control Board's
report identified budget gap risks of $1.0 billion, $1.9 billion, $2.3 billion
and $2.6 billion in fiscal years 1994 through 1997, respectively.
On June 3, 1993, the Mayor announced that State and federal aid for
Fiscal Year 1993-1994 would be $280 million less than projected and that in
order to balance the City's budget $176 million of previously announced
contingent budget cuts would be imposed. The Mayor indicated that further
savings would entail serious reductions in services. The State Comptroller on
June 14, 1993 criticized efforts by the Mayor and City Council to balance the
City's budget which rely primarily on one-shot revenues. The Comptroller added
that the City's budget should be based on "recurring revenues that fund
recurring expenditures." Given the foregoing factors, there can be no
assurance that the City will continue to maintain a balanced budget, or that
it can maintain a balanced budget without additional tax or other revenue
increases or reductions in City services, which could adversely affect the
City's economic base.
Pursuant to State law, the City prepares a four-year annual financial
plan, which is reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis and which includes
the City's capital, revenue and expense projections. The City is required to
submit its financial plans to review bodies, including the Control Board. If
the City were to experience certain adverse financial circumstances, including
the occurrence or the substantial likelihood and imminence of the occurrence
of an annual operating deficit of more than $100 million or the loss of access
to the public credit markets to satisfy the City's capital and seasonal
financial requirements, the Control Board would be required by State law to
exercise certain powers, including prior approval of City financial plans,
proposed borrowings and certain contracts.
The City depends on the State for State aid both to enable the City to
balance its budget and to meet its cash requirements. As a result of the
national and regional economic recession, the State's projections of tax
revenues for its 1991 and 1992 fiscal years were substantially reduced. For
its 1993 fiscal year, the State, before taking any remedial action reflected
in the State budget enacted by the State Legislature on April 2, 1992 reported
a potential budget deficit of $4.8 billion. If the State experiences revenue
shortfalls or spending increases beyond its projections during its 1993 fiscal
year or subsequent years, such developments could also result in reductions in
projected State aid to the City. In addition, there can be no assurance that
State budgets in future fiscal years will be adopted by the April 1 statutory
deadline and that there will not be adverse effects on the City's cash flow
and additional City expenditures as a result of such delays.
The City's projections set forth in its financial plan are based on
various assumptions and contingencies which are uncertain and which may not
materialize. Changes in major assumptions could significantly affect the
City's ability to balance its budget as required by State law and to meet its
annual cash flow and financing requirements. Such assumptions and
contingencies include the timing of any regional and local economic recovery,
the absence of wage increases in excess of the increases assumed in its
financial plan, employment growth, provision of State and Federal aid and
mandate relief, State legislative approval of future State budgets, levels of
education expenditures as may be required by State law, adoption of future
City budgets by the New York City Council, and approval by the Governor or
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9 41
the State Legislature and the cooperation of MAC with respect to various other
actions proposed in such financial plan.
The City's ability to maintain a balanced operating budget is dependent
on whether it can implement necessary service and personnel reduction programs
successfully. As discussed above, the City must identify additional
expenditure reductions and revenue sources to achieve balanced operating
budgets for fiscal years 1994 and thereafter. Any such proposed expenditure
reductions will be difficult to implement because of their size and the
substantial expenditure reductions already imposed on City operations in the
past two years.
Attaining a balanced budget is also dependent upon the City's ability to
market its securities successfully in the public credit markets. The City's
financing program for fiscal years 1993 through 1996 contemplates issuance of
$15.7 billion of general obligation bonds primarily to reconstruct and
rehabilitate the City's infrastructure and physical assets and to make capital
investments. A significant portion of such bond financing is used to reimburse
the City's general fund for capital expenditures already incurred. In
addition, the City issues revenue and tax anticipation notes to finance its
seasonal working capital requirements. The terms and success of projected
public sales of City general obligation bonds and notes will be subject to
prevailing market conditions at the time of the sale, and no assurance can be
given that the credit markets will absorb the projected amounts of public bond
and note sales. In addition, future developments concerning the City and
public discussion of such developments, the City's future financial needs and
other issues may affect the market for outstanding City general obligation
bonds and notes. If the City were unable to sell its general obligation bonds
and notes, it would be prevented from meeting its planned operating and
capital expenditures.
The City Comptroller, the staff of the Control Board, the Office of the
State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York (the "OSDC") and other
agencies and public officials have issued reports and made public statements
which, among other things, state that projected revenues may be less and
future expenditures may be greater than those forecast in the financial plan.
In addition, the Control Board and other agencies have questioned whether the
City has the capacity to generate sufficient revenues in the future to meet
the costs of its expenditure increases and to provide necessary services. It
is reasonable to expect that such reports and statements will continue to be
issued and to engender public comment.
The City achieved balanced operating results as reported in accordance
with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year. During the 1990 and 1991 fiscal years, the
City implemented various actions to offset a projected budget deficit of $3.2
billion for the 1991 fiscal year, which resulted from declines in City revenue
sources and increased public assistance needs due to the recession. Such
actions included $822 million of tax increases and substantial expenditure
reductions.
The quarterly modification to the City's financial plan submitted to the
Control Board on May 7, 1992 (the "1992 Modification") projected a balanced
budget in accordance with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year after taking into
account a discretionary transfer of $455 million to the 1993 fiscal year as
the result of a 1992 fiscal year surplus. In order to achieve a balanced
budget for the 1992 fiscal year, during the 1991 fiscal year, the City
proposed various actions for the 1992 fiscal year to close a projected gap of
$3.3 billion in the 1992 fiscal year.
On November 19, 1992, the City submitted to the Control Board the
Financial Plan for the 1993 through 1996 fiscal years, which is a modification
to a financial plan submitted to the Control Board on June 11, 1992 (the "June
Financial Plan"), and which relates to the City, the Board of Education
("BOE") and the City University of New York ("CUNY"). The 1993-1996 Financial
Plan projects revenues and expenditures of $29.9 billion each for the 1993
fiscal year balanced in accordance with GAAP.
During the 1992 fiscal year, the City proposed various actions to close a
previously projected gap of approximately $1.2 billion for the 1993 fiscal
year. The gap-closing actions for the 1993 fiscal year proposed during the
1992 fiscal year and outlined in the City's June Financial Plan included $489
million of discretionary transfers from the 1992 fiscal year. The 1993-1996
City Financial Plan includes additional gap-closing actions to offset an
additional potential $81 million budget gap.
<PAGE>
42 New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9
The 1993-1996 Financial Plan also sets forth projections and outlines a
proposed gap-closing program for the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years to close
projected budget gaps of $1.7 billion, $2.0 billion and $2.6 billion,
respectively, in the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years. On February 9, 1993, the
City issued a modification to the 1993-1996 Financial Plan (the "February
Modification"). The February Modification projects budget gaps for fiscal
years 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $2.1 billion, $3.1 billion and $3.8 billion,
respectively.
Various actions proposed in the 1993-1996 Financial Plan are subject to
approval by the Governor and approval by the State Legislature, and the
proposed increase in Federal aid is subject to approval by Congress and the
President. The State Legislature has in the past failed to approve certain
proposals similar to those that the 1993-1996 Financial Plan assumes will be
approved by the State Legislature during the 1993 fiscal year. If these
actions cannot be implemented, the City will be required to take other actions
to decrease expenditures or increase revenues to maintain a balanced financial
plan.
On March 9, 1993, OSDC issued a report on the February Modification. The
report expressed concern that the budget gaps projected for fiscal years 1994
through 1996 are the largest the City has faced at this point in the financial
planning cycle in at least a decade, and concluded that the February
Modification represented a step backward in the City's efforts to bring
recurring revenues into line with recurring expenditures.
The City is a defendant in a significant number of lawsuits. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, actions commenced and claims
asserted against the City arising out of alleged constitutional violations,
torts, breaches of contracts, and other violations of law and condemnation
proceedings. While the ultimate outcome and fiscal impact, if any, on the
proceedings and claims are not currently predictable, adverse determinations
in certain of them might have a material adverse effect upon the City's
ability to carry out its financial plan. As of June 30, 1992, legal claims in
excess of $341 billion were outstanding against the City for which the City
estimated its potential future liability to be $2.3 billion.
As of the date of this prospectus, Moody's rating of the City's general
obligation bonds stood at Baa1 and S&P's rating stood at A-. On February 11,
1991, Moody's had lowered its rating from A.
On March 30, 1993, in confirming its Baa1 rating, Moody's noted that:
The financial plan for fiscal year 1994 and beyond shows an ongoing
imbalance between the City's expenditures and revenues. The key indication
of this structural imbalance is not necessarily the presence of sizable
out-year budget gaps, but the recurring use of one-shot actions to close
gaps. One-shots constitute a significant share of the proposed gap-closing
program for fiscal year 1994, and they represent an even larger share of
those measures which the City seems reasonably certain to attain. Several
major elements of the program, including certain state actions, federal
counter cyclical aid and part of the city's tax package, remain uncertain.
However, the gap closing plan may be substantially altered when the
executive budget is offered later this spring.
On March 30, 1993, S&P affirmed its A-rating with a negative outlook,
stating that:
The City's key credit factors are marked by a high and growing debt
burden, and taxation levels that are relatively high, but stable. The
City's economy is broad-based and diverse, but currently is in prolonged
recession, with slow growth prospects for the foreseeable future.
The rating outlook is negative, reflecting the continued fiscal
pressure facing the City, driven by continued weakness in the local
economy, rising spending pressures for education and labor costs of city
employees, and increasing costs associated with rising debt for capital
construction and repair.
The current financial plan for the City assumes substantial increases
in aid from national and state governments. Maintenance of the current
rating, and stabilization of the rating outlook, will depend on the City's
success in realizing budgetary aid from these governments, or replacing
those revenues with ongoing revenue-raising measures or spending
reductions under the City's control. However, increased reliance on
non-recurring budget balancing measures that would support current
spending, but defer budgetary gaps to future years, would be viewed by S&P
as detrimental to New York City's single-'A-' rating.
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9 43
Previously, Moody's had raised its rating to A in May, 1988, to Baa1 in
December, 1985, to Baa in November, 1983 and to Ba1 in November, 1981. S&P had
raised its rating to A-in November, 1987, to BBB+ in July, 1985 and to BBB in
March, 1981.
On May 9, 1990, Moody's revised downward its rating on outstanding City
revenue anticipation notes from MIG-1 to MIG-2 and rated the $900 million
Notes then being sold MIG-2. On April 30, 1991 Moody's confirmed its MIG-2
rating for the outstanding revenue anticipation notes and for the $1.25
billion in notes then being sold. On April 29, 1991, S&P revised downward its
rating on City revenue anticipation notes from SP-1 to SP-2.
As of December 31, 1992, the City and MAC had, respectively, $20.3
billion and $4.7 billion of outstanding net long-term indebtedness.
Certain Agencies of the State have faced substantial financial
difficulties which could adversely affect the ability of such Agencies to make
payments of interest on, and principal amounts of, their respective bonds. The
difficulties have in certain instances caused the State (under so-called
"moral obligation" provisions which are non-binding statutory provisions for
State appropriations to maintain various debt service reserve funds) to
appropriate funds on behalf of the Agencies. Moreover, it is expected that the
problems faced by these Agencies will continue and will require increasing
amounts of State assistance in future years. Failure of the State to
appropriate necessary amounts or to take other action to permit those Agencies
having financial difficulties to meet their obligations could result in a
default by one or more of the Agencies. Such default, if it were to occur,
would be likely to have a significant adverse effect on investor confidence
in, and therefore the market price of, obligations of the defaulting Agencies.
In addition, any default in payment on any general obligation of any Agency
whose bonds contain a moral obligation provision could constitute a failure of
certain conditions that must be satisfied in connection with Federal
guarantees of City and MAC obligations and could thus jeopardize the City's
long-term financing plans.
As of September 30, 1992, the State reported that there were eighteen
Agencies that each had outstanding debt of $100 million or more. These
eighteen Agencies had an aggregate of $62.2 billion of outstanding debt,
including refunding bonds, of which the State was obligated under
lease-purchase, contractual obligation or moral obligation provisions on $25.3
billion.
The State is a defendant in numerous legal proceedings pertaining to
matters incidental to the performance of routine governmental operations. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, claims asserted against the State
arising from alleged torts, alleged breaches of contracts, condemnation
proceedings and other alleged violations of State and Federal laws. Included
in the State's outstanding litigation are a number of cases challenging the
constitutionality or the adequacy and effectiveness of a variety of
significant social welfare programs primarily involving the State's mental
hygiene programs. Adverse judgments in these matters generally could result in
injunctive relief coupled with prospective changes in patient care which could
require substantial increased financing of the litigated programs in the
future.
The State is also engaged in a variety of claims wherein significant
monetary damages are sought. Actions commenced by several Indian nations claim
that significant amounts of land were unconstitutionally taken from the
Indians in violation of various treaties and agreements during the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries. The claimants seek recovery of approximately six
million acres of land as well as compensatory and punitive damages.
The U.S. Supreme Court on March 30, 1993 referred to a Special Master for
determination of damages in an action by the State of Delaware to recover
certain unclaimed dividends, interest and other distributions made by issuers
of securities held by New York based-brokers incorporated in Delaware. (State
of Delaware v. State of New York.) The State had taken such unclaimed property
under its Abandoned Property Law. The State expects that it may pay a
significant amount in damages during fiscal year 1993-94 but it has indicated
that it has sufficient funds on hand to pay any such award, including funds
held in contingency reserves. The State's 1993-94 Financial Plan includes the
establishment of a $100 million contingency reserve fund which would be
available to fund such an award which some reports have estimated at $100-$800
million.
In Schulz v. State of New York, commenced May 24, 1993 ("Schulz 1993"),
petitioners have challenged the constitutionality of mass transportation
bonding programs of the New York State Thruway Authority and the
<PAGE>
44 New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9
Metropolitan Transportation Authority. On May 24, 1993, the Supreme Court,
Albany County, temporarily enjoined the State from implementing those bonding
programs. In previous actions Mr. Schulz and others have challenged on similar
grounds bonding programs for the New York State Urban Development Corporation
and the New York Local Government Assistance Corporation. While there have
been no decisions on the merits in such previous actions, by an opinion dated
May 11, 1993, the New York Court of Appeals held in a proceeding commenced on
April 29, 1991 in the Supreme Court, Albany County (Schulz v. State of New
York), that petitioners had standing as voters under the State Constitution to
bring such action.
Petitioners in Schulz 1993 have asserted that issuance of bonds by the
two Authorities is subject to approval by statewide referendum. At this time
there can be no forecast of the likelihood of success on the merits by the
petitioners, but a decision upholding this constitutional challenge could
restrict and limit the ability of the State and its instrumentalities to
borrow funds in the future. The State has not indicated that the temporary
injunction issued by the Supreme Court in this action will have any immediate
impact on its financial condition or interfere with projects requiring
immediate action.
Adverse developments in the foregoing proceedings or new proceedings
could adversely affect the financial condition of the State in the future.
Certain localities in addition to New York City could have financial
problems leading to requests for additional State assistance. Both the Revised
1992-1993 State Financial Plan and the recommended 1993-94 State Financial
Plan includes a significant reduction in State aid to localities in such
programs as revenue sharing and aid to education from projected base-line
growth in such programs. It is expected that such reductions will result in
the need for localities to reduce their spending or increase their revenues.
The potential impact on the State of such actions by localities is not
included in projections of State receipts and expenditures in the State's
1993-94 fiscal year.
Fiscal difficulties experienced by the City of Yonkers ("Yonkers")
resulted in the creation of the Financial Control Board for the City of
Yonkers (the "Yonkers Board") by the State in 1984. The Yonkers Board is
charged with oversight of the fiscal affairs of Yonkers. Future actions taken
by the Governor or the State Legislature to assist Yonkers could result in
allocation of State resources in amounts that cannot yet be determined.
Municipalities and school districts have engaged in substantial
short-term and long-term borrowings. In 1991, the total indebtedness of all
localities in the State was approximately $31.6 billion, of which $16.8
billion was debt of New York City (excluding $6.7 billion in MAC debt). State
law requires the Comptroller to review and make recommendations concerning the
budgets of those local government units other than New York City authorized by
State law to issue debt to finance deficits during the period that such
deficit financing is outstanding. Fifteen localities had outstanding
indebtedness for state financing at the close of their fiscal year ending in
1991. In 1992, an unusually large number of local government units requested
authorization for deficit financings. According to the Comptroller, ten local
government units have been authorized to issue deficit financing in the
aggregate amount of $131.1 million.
Certain proposed Federal expenditure reductions could reduce, or in some
cases eliminate, Federal funding of some local programs and accordingly might
impose substantial increased expenditure requirements on affected localities.
If the State, New York City or any of the Agencies were to suffer serious
financial difficulties jeopardizing their respective access to the public
credit markets, the marketability of notes and bonds issued by localities
within the State, including notes or bonds in the New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust, could be adversely affected. Localities also face
anticipated and potential problems resulting from certain pending litigation,
judicial decisions, and long-range economic trends. The longer-range potential
problems of declining urban population, increasing expenditures, and other
economic trends could adversely affect localities and require increasing State
assistance in the future.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust Units, see "Other
Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Tanner Propp & Farber, special counsel to the Fund for
New York tax matters, under existing New York law:
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9 45
The New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust is not an
association taxable as a corporation and the income of the New York
IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust will be treated as the income
of the Unitholders under the income tax laws of the State and City of
New York. Individuals who reside in New York State or City will not be
subject to State and City tax on interest income which is exempt from
Federal income tax under section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 and derived from obligations of New York State or a political
subdivision thereof, although they will be subject to New York State and
City tax with respect to any gains realized when such obligations are
sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when any such Units are sold or
redeemed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
<S> <C>
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME <F1>
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 43.51
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>............................................................. $ 1.77
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... $ .18
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 41.56
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 41.56
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 3.46
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .11544
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F3><F4><F5>....................................... 4.04%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F3><F4><F5>........................................................................ 4.11%
Initial Distribution (February 1994)........................................................................... $ 2.08
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F5>.................................................................... $ 3.46
PURCHASED INTEREST <F6>........................................................................................ $ 4.95
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>..............$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates...........FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES.....................FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
FEBRUARY 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately
$.30 per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per
Unit prior to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if
issued" Bonds included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest
exceed such amount, the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee.
After the first year, the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated
above. Estimated annual interest income per Unit will be increased to
$43.81. Estimated Annual Expense per Unit (excluding insurance) will be
increased to $2.07; and estimated net annual interest income per Unit
will remain the same as shown. See "Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns." Based on the outstanding principal amount
of Securities as of the Date of Deposit, the Trustee's annual fee would
be $3,014.
<F2> Excluding insurance costs.
<F3> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F5> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F6> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
46 New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 9
<TABLE>
NEW YORK IM-IT INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY SERIES 9 (152ND INSURED
MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO AS OF JANUARY 6, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NEW YORK
IM-IT
INTERMEDIATE
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND LADDERED
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION MATURITY
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 600,000 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Transit
Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1993N (MBIA Insured)
#350M--4.20% Due 7/1/2000.................................... AAA $ 350,326
#250M--4.40% Due 7/1/2002.................................... AAA 250,060
600,000 New York State Medical Care Facilities Finance Agency, Mental
Health Services Facilities Improvement Refunding Revenue
Bonds, Series 1993F (FSA Insured)
#250M--4.30% Due 8/15/2000................................... AAA 250,217
#350M--4.75% Due 8/15/2004................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 348,425
250,000 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, State University
Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1993C
5.10% Due 5/15/2001.......................................... BBB+ 253,930
250,000 Suffolk County Water Authority, New York, Water System Revenue
Bonds, Series 1994 Subordinate Lien Refundings (MBIA
Insured)**
#4.125% Due 6/1/2001......................................... AAA 248,980
100,000 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Marist College,
Insured Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 (MBIA Insured)
#5.20% Due 7/1/2001.......................................... AAA 106,073
25,000 Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Public Education and
Health Facilities Refunding Bonds, Series 1989-I (FGIC
Insured)
#0.00% Due 7/1/2001.......................................... AAA 18,150<F6>
490,000 Town of North Hempstead, New York, Solid Waste Management
Authority, Solid Waste Management Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 1993B (MBIA Insured)
#350M--4.50% Due 2/1/2002.................................... AAA 353,654
#140M--4.70% Due 2/1/2004.................................... AAA 141,638
20,000 New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York,
Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Fiscal 1989B (MBIA
Insured)
#0.00% Due 6/15/2002......................................... AAA 13,709<F6>
20,000 New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority (New York)
Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Fiscal Series 1993A
(MBIA Insured)
#0.00% Due 6/15/2002......................................... AAA 13,823<F6>
75,000 The City of New York, New York, General Obligation Bonds,
Fiscal 1992 Series D (FGIC Insured)
#0.00% Due 2/1/2003.......................................... AAA 49,545<F6>
400,000 New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York,
Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1993B (MBIA
Insured)
5.00% Due 6/15/2003.......................................... AAA 413,612
135,000 New York State Project Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds (Secured
by HUD Section 236 Payments) Series 1993A (FSA Insured)
4.60% Due 11/1/2003.......................................... AAA 135,506
110,000 Suffolk County, New York, Public Improvement Bonds, Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
4.40% Due 10/15/2004......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 108,555
$ 3,056,203
$ 3,075,000
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured either by one of the Preinsured
Bond Insurers (as indicated in the Bond name) or under the portfolio insurance
policy obtained by the Trust from AMBAC Indemnity. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
Pennsylvania IM-IT-- Series 181 47
PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST
GENERAL. The Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust consists of 10 issues of
Securities. Two of the Bonds in the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust are general
obligations of the governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the
taxing power thereof. The remaining issues are payable from the income of a
specific project or authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to
levy taxes. These issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of
principal amount to total Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust) as follows: General
Obligations, 2 (28%); Water and Sewer, 3 (23%); Industrial Revenue, 1 (14%);
General Purpose, 1 (13%); Transportation, 1 (11%); Airport, 1 (8%) and Health
Care, 1 (3%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS. Investors should be aware of certain factors that
might affect the financial conditions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania historically has been identified as a heavy industry state
although that reputation has changed recently as the industrial composition of
the Commonwealth diversified when the coal, steel and railroad industries
began to decline. The major new sources of growth in Pennsylvania are in the
service sector, including trade, medical and the health services, education
and financial institutions. Pennsylvania's agricultural industries are also an
important component of the Commonwealth's economic structure, accounting for
more than $3.6 billion in crop and livestock products annually, while
agribusiness and food related industries support $38 billion in economic
activity annually.
Non-agricultural employment in the Commonwealth declined by 5.1 percent
during the recessionary period from 1980 to 1983. In 1984, the declining trend
was reversed as employment grew by 2.9 percent over 1983 levels. From 1983 to
1990, Commonwealth employment continued to grow each year, increasing an
additional 14.3 percent. For the last two years, unemployment in the
Commonwealth has declined 1.9 percent. The growth in employment experienced in
Pennsylvania is comparable to the growth in employment in the Middle Atlantic
Region which has occurred during this period.
Back to back recessions in the early 1980's reduced the manufacturing
sector's employment levels moderately during 1980 and 1981, sharply during
1982, and even further in 1983. Non-manufacturing employment has increased
steadily since 1980 to its 1992 level of 81.3 percent of total Commonwealth
employment. Consequently, manufacturing employment constitutes a diminished
share of total employment within the Commonwealth. Manufacturing, contributing
18.7 percent of 1992 non-agricultural employment, has fallen behind both the
services sector and the trade sector as the largest single source of
employment within the Commonwealth. In 1992 the services sector accounted for
29.3 percent of all non-agricultural employment while the trade sector
accounted for 22.7 percent.
From 1983 to 1989, Pennsylvania's annual average unemployment rate
dropped from 11.8 percent to 4.5 percent, falling below the national rate in
1986 for the first time in over a decade. Pennsylvania's annual average
unemployment rate remained below the national average from 1986 until 1990.
Slower economic growth caused the unemployment rate in the Commonwealth to
rise to 6.9 percent in 1991 and 7.5 percent in 1992. In April 1993 the
seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the Commonwealth was 6.6 percent
compared to 7.0 percent for the United States.
It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by
local Pennsylvania issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of
obligations issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and there is no
obligation on the part of the Commonwealth to make payment on such local
obligations in the event of default.
Financial information for the General Fund is maintained on a budgetary
basis of accounting. A budgetary basis of accounting is used for the purpose
of ensuring compliance with the enacted operating budget and is governed by
applicable statutes of the Commonwealth and by administrative procedures. The
Commonwealth also prepares annual financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The budgetary basis
financial information maintained by the Commonwealth to monitor and enforce
budgetary control is adjusted at fiscal year-end to reflect appropriate
accruals for financial reporting in conformity with GAAP.
Fiscal 1991 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: During fiscal 1991 the General
Fund experienced an $861.2 million operating deficit resulting in a fund
balance deficit of $980.9 million at June 30, 1991. The operating deficit was
a consequence of the effect of a national recession that restrained budget
revenues and pushed expenditures above budgeted levels. At June 30, 1991, a
negative unreserved-undesignated balance of $1,146.2 million was reported.
<PAGE>
48 Pennsylvania IM-IT-- Series 181
During fiscal 1991 the balance in the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund was used
to maintain vital state spending and only a minimal balance remains in that
fund.
Budgetary Basis: A deficit of $453.6 million was recorded by the General
Fund at June 30, 1991. The deficit was a consequence of higher than budgeted
expenditures and lower than estimated revenues during the fiscal year brought
about by the national economic recession that began during the fiscal year. A
number of actions were taken throughout the fiscal year by the Commonwealth to
mitigate the effects of the recession on budget revenues and expenditures.
Actions taken, together with normal appropriation lapses, produced $871
million in expenditure reductions and revenue increases for the fiscal year.
The most significant of these actions were a $214 million transfer from the
Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority, a $134 million transfer from
the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund, and a pooled financing program to match
federal Medicaid funds replacing $145 million of state funds.
Fiscal 1992 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: During fiscal 1992 the General
Fund reported a $1.1 billion operating surplus. This operating surplus was
achieved through legislated tax rate increases and tax base broadening
measures enacted in August 1991 and by controlling expenditures through
numerous cost reduction measures implemented throughout the fiscal year. As a
result of the fiscal 1992 operating surplus, the fund balance has increased to
$87.5 million and the unreserved-undesignated deficit has dropped to $138.6
million from its fiscal 1991 level of $1,146.2 million.
Budgetary Basis: Eliminating the budget deficit carried into fiscal 1992
from fiscal 1991 and providing revenues for fiscal 1992 budgeted expenditures
required tax revisions that are estimated to have increased receipts for the
1992 fiscal year by over $2.7 billion. Total revenues for the fiscal year were
$14,516.8 million, a $2,654.5 million increase over cash revenues during
fiscal 1991. Originally based on forecasts for an economic recovery, the
budget revenue estimates were revised downward during the fiscal year to
reflect continued recessionary economic activity. Largely due to the tax
revisions enacted for the budget, corporate tax receipts totalled $3,761.2
million, up from $2,656.3 million in fiscal 1991, sales tax receipts increased
by $302 million to $4,499.7 million, and personal income tax receipts totalled
$4,807.4 million, an increase of $1,443.8 million over receipts in fiscal
1991.
As a result of the lowered revenue estimate during the fiscal year,
increased emphasis was placed on restraining expenditure growth and reducing
expenditure levels. A number of cost reductions were implemented during the
fiscal year and contributed to $296.8 million of appropriation lapses. These
appropriation lapses were responsible for the $8.8 million surplus at fiscal
year-end, after accounting for the required ten percent transfer of the
surplus to the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund.
Spending increases in the fiscal 1992 budget were largely accounted for
by increases for education, social services and corrections programs.
Commonwealth funds for the support of public schools were increased by 9.8
percent to provide a $438 million increase to $4.9 billion for fiscal 1992.
The fiscal 1992 budget provided additional funds for basic and special
education and included provisions designed to help restrain the annual
increase of special education costs, an area of recent rapid cost increases.
Child welfare appropriations supporting county operated child welfare programs
were increased $67 million, more than 31.5 percent over fiscal 1991. Other
social service areas such as medical and cash assistance also received
significant funding increases as costs have risen quickly as a result of the
economic recession and high inflation rates of medical care costs. The costs
of corrections programs, reflecting the marked increase in the prisoner
population, increased by 12 percent. Economic development efforts, largely
funded from bond proceeds in fiscal 1991, were continued with General Fund
appropriations for fiscal 1992.
The budget included the use of several Medicaid pooled financing
transactions. These pooling transactions replaced $135 million of Commonwealth
funds, allowing total spending under the budget to increase by an equal
amount.
Fiscal 1993 Budget. The latest budget estimates project expenditures from
Commonwealth funds for fiscal 1993 to be $13.857 billion, representing only a
$5.2 million increase over fiscal 1992 expenditures. The fiscal 1993 budget is
balanced within the official revenue estimate and a planned draw-down of the
$8.8 million beginning budgetary basis surplus carried forward from Fiscal
1992. The Fiscal 1993 budget was amended on May 28, 1993, through the
enactment of $165.1 million of supplemental appropriations. This small
increase in expenditures is the result of revenues being constrained by a
personal income tax rate reduction effective July 1, 1992, a low rate of
economic growth, higher tax refund reserves to cushion against adverse
decisions on pending tax litigations, and the receipt of Federal funds for
expenditures previously paid out of Commonwealth funds. The amended fiscal
1993 budget
<PAGE>
Pennsylvania IM-IT-- Series 181 49
restored partial funding for private educational institutions that normally
receive state appropriations but whose appropriations were item-vetoed by the
Governor from the originally adopted fiscal 1993 budget. Also restored by the
amended budget were certain grants to the counties to help pay operating costs
of the local judicial system.
Commonwealth revenue sources are estimated for the fiscal 1993 budget to
total $14.592 billion, a $74.9 million increase over actual fiscal 1992
revenues, representing an increase of approximately one-half of one percent.
The projected low revenue growth for fiscal 1993 is caused by the
Commonwealth's expectation that current weak growth in employment, consumer
income, and retail sales will continue, and by the reduction in the personal
income tax rate from 3.1 percent to 2.8 percent on July 1, 1992. In addition,
tax refund reserves were increased $209.0 million to $548.0 million for fiscal
1993 to allow for potential tax refunds that might be payable from any adverse
judicial decision in a number of pending tax litigations. In January 1993, the
refund estimate was reduced to $530 million.
Through May 1993, fiscal 1993 total General Fund revenue collections were
$7.1 million (0.05 percent) above estimate, as fiscal year-to-date shortfalls
in receipts of corporation taxes ($30.3 million) and personal income tax
($37.2 million) were offset mainly by above estimate sales tax and
miscellaneous revenue collections.
Fiscal 1994 Budget (Budgetary Basis). The enacted 1994 fiscal year budget
provides for $14.999 billion of appropriations of Commonwealth funds. The
largest increase in appropriations is for the Department of Public
Welfare--$235 million--to meet the increasing costs of medical care and rising
case loads. Other large increases are education--$196 million--including $130
million to increase state educational subsidies for the most needy school
districts and $104 million for correctional institutions to pay operating
costs and lease payments for five new prisons and to expand the capacity of
two existing facilities.
The budget estimates revenue growth of 4.0 percent over revised fiscal
1993 estimates. The revenue estimate is based on an expectation of continued
economic recovery, but at a slow rate. Sale tax receipts are projected to rise
5.1 percent over the fiscal 1993 estimate while personal income tax receipts
are projected to increase by 2.4 percent, a rate that is low because of the
tax rate reduction in July 1992.
All outstanding general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth are rated
AA-by S&P and A1 by Moody's.
Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings must be
obtained from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any ratings will
continue for any period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn.
The City of Philadelphia is the largest city in the Commonwealth with an
estimated population of 1,585,577 according to the 1990 Census. Philadelphia
functions both as a city and a first-class county for the purpose of
administering various governmental programs.
Legislation providing for the establishment of the Pennsylvania
Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority ("PICA") to assist first class cities
in remedying fiscal emergencies was enacted by the General Assembly and
approved by the Governor in June 1991. PICA is designed to provide assistance
through the issuance of funding debt to liquidate budget deficits and to make
factual findings and recommendations to the assisted city concerning its
budgetary and fiscal affairs. An intergovernmental cooperation agreement
between Philadelphia and PICA was approved by City Counsel on January 3, 1992,
and approved by the PICA Board and signed by the Mayor on January 8, 1992. At
this time, Philadelphia is operating under a five-year fiscal plan approved by
PICA on April 6, 1992. Full implementation of the five-year plan was delayed
due to labor negotiations that were not completed until October 1992, three
months after the expiration of the old labor contracts. The terms of the new
labor contracts are estimated to cost approximately $144.0 million more than
what was budgeted in the original five-year plan. The Mayor and his
Administration have amended the plan to bring it back in balance and their
plan is presently being considered by PICA and City Council.
In June 1992, PICA issued $474,555,000 of its Special Tax Revenue Bonds
to provide financial assistance to Philadelphia and to liquidate the
cumulative General Fund balance deficit. In March 1993, Philadelphia filed an
amended five-year plan with PICA, in which the General Fund balance deficit
for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1993, is projected to be $6.6 million. The
fiscal 1994 budget, approved by City Council, projects no deficit and a
balanced budget for the year ending June 30, 1994. PICA approved the fiscal
1994 budget plan on April 14, 1993.
As of the date hereof, the ratings on the City's long-term obligations
supported by payments from the City's General Fund are rated Ba by Moody's and
B by S&P. Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings
<PAGE>
50 Pennsylvania IM-IT-- Series 181
must be obtained from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any
ratings will continue for any period of time or that they will not be revised
or withdrawn.
The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the
financial difficulties which may impact certain issuers of bonds and does not
purport to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions
to which the issuers of the Bonds in the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust are subject.
Additionally, many factors including national economic, social and
environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the
issuers of Bonds, could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of
the State and various agencies and political subdivisions located in the
State. The Sponsor is unable to predict whether or to what extent such factors
or other factors may affect the issuers of Bonds, the market value or
marketability of the Bonds or the ability of the respective issuers of the
Bonds acquired by the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust to pay Interest on or principal
of the Bonds.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, counsel to the Fund for
Pennsylvania tax matters, under existing law:
(1) Units evidencing fractional undivided interest in the Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trust, which are represented by obligations issued by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, any public authority, commission, board
or other agency created by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, any
political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or any
public authority created by any such political subdivision are not
taxable under any of the personal property taxes presently in effect
in Pennsylvania;
(2) distributions of interest income to Unitholders are not subject to
personal income tax under the Pennsylvania Tax Reform Code of 1971;
nor will such interest be taxable under the Philadelphia School
District Investment Income Tax imposed on Philadelphia resident
individuals;
(3) a Unitholder may have a taxable event under the Pennsylvania state
and local income taxes referred to in the preceding paragraph upon the
redemption or sale of his Units but not upon the disposition of any of
the Securities in the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust to which the
Unitholder's Units relate; Units will be taxable under the
Pennsylvania inheritance and estate taxes;
(4) Units are subject to Pennsylvania inheritance and estate taxes;
(5) a Unitholder which is a corporation may have a taxable event under
the Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax when it redeems or sells its
Units. Interest income distributed to Unitholders which are
corporations is not subject to Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax
or Mutual Thrift Institutions Tax. However, banks, title insurance
companies and trust companies may be required to take the value of the
Units into account in determining the taxable value of their Shares
subject to Shares Tax; and
(6) any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the Trustee
or obtained by the issuers of the Bonds with respect to the Bonds
which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the
Trustee will be excludable from Pennsylvania gross income if, and to
the same extent as, such interest would have been so excludable if
paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations.
(7) The Fund is not taxable as a corporation under Pennsylvania tax
laws applicable to corporations.
In rendering its opinion, Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul has not, for timing
reasons, made an independent review of proceedings related to the issuance of
the Bonds. It has relied on Van Kampen Merritt Inc. for assurance that the
Bonds have been issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or by or on behalf
of municipalities or other governmental agencies within the Commonwealth.
<PAGE>
Pennsylvania IM-IT-- Series 181 51
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
<S> <C>
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME <F1>
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 50.48
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>............................................................. $ 1.85
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 48.63
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 48.63
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.05
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .13510
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F3><F4><F5>....................................... 4.86%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F3><F4><F5>........................................................................ 4.91%
Initial Distribution (February 1994)........................................................................... $ 2.43
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F5>.................................................................... $ 4.05
PURCHASED INTEREST <F6>........................................................................................ $ 7.29
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>..............$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates...........FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES.....................FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH
<FN>
<F1> During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately
$.10 per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit
prior to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued"
Bonds included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such
amount, the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the
first year, the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above.
Estimated annual interest income per Unit will be increased to $50.58.
Estimated Annual Expense per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased
to $1.95; and estimated net annual interest income per Unit will remain
the same as shown. See "Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term
Returns." Based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities as of
the Date of Deposit, the Trustee's annual fee would be $4,337.
<F2> Excluding Insurance costs.
<F3> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F5> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F6> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
52 Pennsylvania IM-IT-- Series 181
<TABLE>
PENNSYLVANIA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 181 (152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO AS OF JANUARY 6, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND PENNSYLVANIA
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION IM-IT
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 Wyoming Valley Sanitary Authority (Luzerne County,
Pennsylvania) Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (FSA
Insured)** 2003 @ 100
#5.25% Due 11/15/2010........................................ AAA 2008 @ 100 S.F. $ 494,230
595,000 Rose Tree Media School District, Delaware County, Pennsylvania,
General Obligation Bonds, Series 1993 (FGIC Insured) 2004 @ 100
#5.50% Due 2/15/2014......................................... AAA 2011 @ 100 S.F. 600,021
550,000 The Philadelphia Municipal Authority, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A
(FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.625% Due 11/15/2014....................................... AAA 2011 @ 100 S.F. 559,641
650,000 Blairsville-Saltsburg School District (Indiana and Westmoreland
Counties, Pennsylvania) General Obligation Bonds, Refunding
Series 1993 (MBIA Insured) 2003 @ 100
#5.45% Due 5/15/2016......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 653,250
140,000 Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority (Pennsylvania)
Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1992 (Magee-Women's
Hospital) FGIC Insured
#0.00% Due 10/1/2016......................................... AAA 40,064<F6>
25,000 Pottstown Borough Authority, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania,
Guaranteed Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1991 (Guaranteed by
the Borough of Pottstown) FGIC Insured
#0.00% Due 11/1/2017......................................... AAA 6,740<F6>
500,000 Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Pennsylvania Turnpike
Revenue Bonds, Series 1992-O (FGIC Insured) 2002 @ 102
#5.50% Due 12/1/2017......................................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 504,495
500,000 City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Water and Wastewater
Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (MBIA Insured)
#5.00% Due 6/15/2019......................................... AAA 2003 @ 100 474,990
365,000 Lehigh-Northampton Airport Authority, Pennsylvania, Airport
Revenue Bonds (Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton International
Airport) Series 1993B (MBIA Insured) 2004 @ 102
#5.50% Due 1/1/2023.......................................... AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 369,457
600,000 Beaver County Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania,
Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (Ohio
Edison Company Mansfield Project) AMBAC Indemnity Insured
#5.45% Due 9/15/2033......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 598,128
$ 4,425,000 $ 4,304,016
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
Notes to Portfolios 53
NOTES TO PORTFOLIOS:
AS OF THE DATE OF DEPOSIT: JANUARY 6, 1994
(1) All Securities are represented by "regular way" or "when issued"
contracts for the performance of which an irrevocable letter of credit,
obtained from an affiliate of the Trustee, has been deposited with the
Trustee. At the Date of Deposit, Securities may have been delivered to
the Sponsor pursuant to certain of these contracts; the Sponsor has
assigned to the Trustee all of its right, title and interest in and to
such Securities. Contracts to acquire Securities were entered into during
the period from December 7, 1993 to January 5, 1994. These Securities
have expected settlement dates ranging from January 6, 1994 to February
15, 1994 (see "Unitholder Explanations").
(2) All ratings are by Standard & Poor's Corporation unless otherwise
indicated. "*" indicates that the rating of the Bond is by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. The ratings represent the latest published
ratings by the respective ratings agency or, if not published, represent
private letter ratings or those ratings expected to be published by the
respective ratings agency. "Y" indicates that such rating is contingent
upon physical receipt by the respective ratings agency of a policy of
insurance obtained by the issuer of the bonds involved and issued by the
Preinsured Bond Insurer named in the bond's title. A commitment for
insurance in connection with these bonds has been issued by the
Preinsured Bond Insurer named in the bond's title. "N/R" indicates that
the applicable rating service did not provide a rating for that
particular Security. For a brief description of the rating symbols and
their related meanings, see "Other Matters-- Description of Securities
Ratings".
(3) There is shown under this heading the year in which each issue of Bonds
is initially or currently callable and the call price for that year. Each
issue of Bonds continues to be callable at declining prices thereafter
(but not below par value) except for original issue discount bonds which
are redeemable at prices based on the issue price plus the amount of
original issue discount accreted to redemption date plus, if applicable,
some premium, the amount of which will decline in subsequent years.
"S.F." indicates a sinking fund is established with respect to an issue
of Bonds. Redemption pursuant to call provisions generally will, and
redemption pursuant to sinking fund provisions may, occur at times when
the redeemed bonds have an offering side valuation which represents a
premium over par. Certain Bonds may be subject to redemption without
premium prior to the date shown pursuant to extraordinary optional or
mandatory redemptions if certain events occur. Single family mortgage
revenue bonds and housing authority bonds are most likely to be called
subject to such provisions, but other bonds may have similar call
features. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, certain bond
issuers have in the past and others may in the future attempt to redeem
Bonds prior to their initially scheduled call dates and at prices which
do not include any premiums. For a general discussion of certain of these
events, see "Unitholder Explanations--Bond Redemptions". To the extent
that the Securities were deposited in a Trust at a price higher than the
price at which they are redeemed, this will represent a loss of capital
when compared with the original Public Offering Price of the Units.
Conversely, to the extent that the Bonds were acquired at a price lower
than the redemption price, this will represent an increase in capital
when compared with the original Public Offering Price of the Units.
Distributions will generally be reduced by the amount of the income which
would otherwise have been paid with respect to redeemed Securities and
there will be distributed to Unitholders the principal amount and any
premium received on such redemption. The Estimated Current Return and
Estimated Long-Term Return in this event may be affected by such
redemptions. For the Federal tax effect on Unitholders of such
redemptions and resultant distributions, see paragraph <F2>under "Other
Matters--Federal Tax Status".
(4) Evaluation of Securities is made on the basis of current offering prices
for the Securities. The offering prices are greater than the current bid
prices of the Securities which is the basis on which Unit value is
determined for purposes of redemption of Units (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price").
(5) Other information regarding the Bonds in each Trust, as of the Date of
Deposit, is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL PROFIT
INSURANCE COST TO (LOSS) TO ANNUAL INTEREST BID SIDE EVALUATION
TRUST COST SPONSOR SPONSOR INCOME TO TRUST OF BONDS
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT................................. $ 565 $ 9,473,495 $ 70,010 $ 532,506 $ 9,473,794
IM-IT Limited Maturity................ -- $ 4,836,172 $ 43,712 $ 248,448 $ 4,843,519
Michigan IM-IT........................ -- $ 3,318,110 $ 33,043 $ 181,113 $ 3,325,123
New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity.................... $ 550 $ 3,037,356 $ 18,847 $ 134,718 $ 3,031,963
Pennsylvania IM-IT.................... -- $ 4,265,198 $ 38,818 $ 230,613 $ 4,271,969
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
54 Notes to Portfolios
The Sponsor may have entered into contracts which hedge interest rate
fluctuations on certain Bonds in certain Portfolios. The cost of any such
contracts and the corresponding gain or loss is included in the Cost to
Sponsor.
Certain Securities in the Fund, if any, marked by a double asterisk (**),
have been purchased on a "when, as and if issued" or "delayed delivery"
basis. Interest on these Securities begins accruing to the benefit of
Unitholders on their respective dates of delivery. Delivery is expected
to take place at various dates after the First Settlement Date as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF
AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL RANGE OF DAYS SUBSEQUENT
TRUST AMOUNT TO FIRST SETTLEMENT DATE
<S> <C> <C>
IM-IT............................... 7% 5 days
IM-IT Limited Maturity.............. 0% --
Michigan IM-IT...................... 0% --
New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity.................. 8% 32 days
Pennsylvania IM-IT.................. 11% 6 days
</TABLE>
On the Date of Deposit, the offering side evaluations of the Securities
in the IM-IT, IM-IT Limited Maturity, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts were higher
than the bid side evaluations of such Securities by 0.71%, 0.73%, 0.75%,
0.79% and 0.72%, respectively, of the aggregate principal amounts of
such Securities.
"#" indicates that such Bond was issued at an original issue discount.
The tax effect of Bonds issued at an original issue discount is described
in "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
(6) This Bond has been purchased at a deep discount from the par value
because there is little or no stated interest income thereon. Bonds which
pay no interest are normally described as "zero coupon" bonds. Over the
life of bonds purchased at a deep discount the value of such bonds will
increase such that upon maturity the holders of such bonds will receive
100% of the principal amount thereof. Approximately 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, and
4% of the aggregate principal amount of the Securities in the IM-IT,
IM-IT Limited Maturity, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania IM-IT are "zero coupon" bonds,
respectively.
(7) The issuer of this Bond has sold or reserved the right to sell to third
parties all or a portion of its right to call the Bond in accordance with
the redemption provisions of the Bond. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Bond Redemptions."
<PAGE>
Underwriting 55
UNDERWRITING. The Underwriters named below have severally purchased Units
in the following respective amounts from the Sponsor.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME ADDRESS IM-IT UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 4,000
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 1,254
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 500
Kemper Securities, Inc. 77 West Wacker Drive, 28th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601 500
Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc. 777 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 250
J. C. Bradford & Co. 330 Commerce Street, Nashville, Tennessee 37201 250
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
William R. Hough & Company 100 Second Avenue South, 8th Floor, St. Petersburg, Florida 250
33701
The Principal/Eppler, Guerin & Turner, Fountain Place, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 2300, Dallas, Texas 250
Inc. 75201
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York 250
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292
Southwest Securities Inc. 1201 Elm Street, Suite 4300, Dallas, Texas 75270 250
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated 500 North Broadway, St. Louis, Missouri 63102 250
B. C. Ziegler and Company 215 North Main Street, West Bend, Wisconsin 53095 250
Advest, Inc. 280 Trumbull Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 100
Butler, Wick & Co., Inc. City Center One, Suite 700, P.O. Box 149, Youngstown, Ohio 100
44501
Dain Bosworth Incorporated 100 Dain Tower, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 100
Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. 100 Light Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21203 100
Fidelity Capital Markets 161 Devonshire Street D4, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 100
A Division of National Financial
Services
Corporation
First of Michigan Corporation 100 Renaissance Center, 26th Floor, Detroit, Michigan 48243 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
J. J. B. Hilliard, W. L. Lyons, Inc. 501 South Fourth Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202 100
Huntleigh Securities Corporation 222 South Central, 3rd Floor, St. Louis, Missouri 63105 100
Janney Montgomery Scott Inc. 1801 Market Street, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 100
19103
Linsco/Private Ledger Financial Services, 5871 Oberlin Drive, San Diego, California 92121 100
Inc.
Mabon Securities Corp. One Liberty Plaza, 165 Broadway, New York, New York 10006 100
Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc. 50 North Front Street, Memphis, Tennessee 38103 100
Roosevelt & Cross Inc. 20 Exchange Place, New York, New York 10005 100
Smith Barney Shearson 2 World Trade Center, 101st Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Wheat, First Securities, Inc. River Front Plaza, 901 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 100
23219
10,104
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IM-IT LIMITED
MATURITY TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 3,900
J. W. Charles Securities Inc. 980 North Federal Highway, Suite 210, Boca Raton, Florida 100
33432
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Fidelity Capital Markets 161 Devonshire Street D4, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 100
A Division of National Financial
Services
Corporation
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Kemper Securities, Inc. 77 West Wacker Drive, 28th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York 100
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 100
Roosevelt & Cross Inc. 20 Exchange Place, New York, New York 10005 100
Southwest Securities Inc. 1201 Elm Street, Suite 4300, Dallas, Texas 75270 100
5,000
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
56 Underwriting
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MICHIGAN
IM-IT TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,154
First of Michigan Corporation 100 Renaissance Center, 26th Floor, Detroit, Michigan 48243 600
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 250
Roney & Co. One Griswold, Detroit, Michigan 48226 250
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York 100
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292
3,554
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NEW YORK
IM-IT
INTERMEDIATE
LADDERED
MATURITY TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,225
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York 500
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
3,075
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PENNSYLVANIA
IM-IT TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 1,909
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York 750
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 250
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 250
Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc. 111 South Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202 250
Advest, Inc. 280 Trumbull Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 100
Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. Four Falls Corporate Center, Suite 212, Route 23, West Consho- 100
hocken, Pennsylvania 19428
Janney Montgomery Scott Inc. 1801 Market Street, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 100
19103
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Nathan & Lewis Securities, Inc. 119 West 40th Street, New York, New York 10018 100
W. H. Newbold's Son & Co. 1500 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 100
Parker/Hunter, Incorporated 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 100
Smith Barney Shearson 2 World Trade Center, 101st Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Wheat, First Securities, Inc. River Front Plaza, 901 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 100
23219
4,559
</TABLE>
Units may also be sold to broker-dealers and others at prices
representing the per Unit concession or agency commission stated under "Trust
Administration--General--Unit Distribution". However, resales of Units by such
broker-dealers and others to the public will be made at the Public Offering
Price described in the Prospectus. The Sponsor reserves the right to reject,
in whole or in part, any order for the purchase of Units and the right to
change the amount of the concession or agency commission from time to time.
In addition to any other benefits the Underwriters may realize from the
sale of the Units of the Fund, the Agreement Among Underwriters provides that
the Sponsor will share on a pro rata basis among those Underwriters who
underwrite at least 250 Units 50% of the aggregate gain, if any, represented
by the difference between the Sponsor's cost of the Securities in connection
with their acquisition and the evaluation thereof on the Date of Deposit
<PAGE>
Underwriting 57
less deductions for certain accrued interest and certain other costs. See
"Trust Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation" and
"Portfolio" for the applicable Trust.
Underwriters and broker-dealers of the Trusts, banks and/or others are
eligible to participate in a program in which such firms receive from the
Sponsor a nominal award for each of their representatives who have sold a
minimum number of units of unit investment trusts created by the Sponsor
during a specified time period. In addition, at various times the Sponsor may
implement other programs under which the sales forces of Underwriters,
brokers, dealers, banks and/or others may be eligible to win other nominal
awards for certain sales efforts, or under which the Sponsor will reallow to
any such Underwriters, brokers, dealers, banks and/or others that sponsor
sales contests or recognition programs conforming to criteria established by
the Sponsor, or participate in sales programs sponsored by the Sponsor, an
amount not exceeding the total applicable sales charges on the sales generated
by such persons at the public offering price during such programs. Also, the
Sponsor in its discretion may from time to time pursuant to objective criteria
established by the Sponsor pay fees to qualifying underwriters, brokers,
dealers, banks or others for certain services or activities which are
primarily intended to result in sales of Units of the Trusts. Such payments
are made by the Sponsor out of its own assets, and not out of the assets of
the Trusts. These programs will not change the price Unitholders pay for their
Units or the amount that the Trusts will receive from the Units sold.
Approximately every eighteen months the Sponsor holds a business seminar which
is open to Underwriters that sell units of trusts it sponsors. The Sponsor
pays substantially all costs associated with the seminar, excluding
Underwriter travel costs. Each Underwriter is invited to send a certain number
of representatives based on the gross number of units such firm underwrites
during a designated time period.
<PAGE>
58 Trust Administration
FUND ADMINISTRATION AND EXPENSES
SPONSOR. Van Kampen Merritt Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the Sponsor
of the Trust. Van Kampen Merritt Inc. is primarily owned by Clayton, Dubilier
& Rice, Inc., a New York-based private investment firm. Van Kampen Merritt
Inc. management owns a significant minority equity position. Van Kampen
Merritt Inc. specializes in the underwriting and distribution of unit
investment trusts and mutual funds. The Sponsor is a member of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and has its principal office at One
Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 (708) 684-6000. It maintains
a branch office in Philadelphia and has regional representatives in Atlanta,
Dallas, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Tampa. As of
September 30, 1993 the total stockholders' equity of Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
was $200,885,000 (unaudited). (This paragraph relates only to the Sponsor and
not to the Insured Municipals Income Trust or to any Insured Multi-Series
thereof or to any other Underwriter. The information is included herein only
for the purpose of informing investors as to the financial responsibility of
the Sponsor and its ability to carry out its contractual obligations. More
detailed financial information will be made available by the Sponsor upon
request.)
As of November 30, 1993, the Sponsor and its affiliates managed or
supervised approximately $38.5 billion of investment products, of which over
$25 billion is invested in municipal securities. The Sponsor and its
affiliates managed $23 billion of assets, consisting of $8.2 billion for 19
open end mutual funds, $8.3 billion for 33 closed-end funds and $6.5 billion
for 51 institutional accounts. The Sponsor has also deposited approximately
$23.5 billion of unit investment trusts. Based on cumulative assets deposited,
the Sponsor believes that it is the largest sponsor of insured municipal unit
investment trusts, primarily through the success of its Insured Municipal
Income Trust(R) or the IM-IT(R) trust. The Sponsor also provides surveillance
and evaluation services at cost for approximately $15.5 billion of unit
investment trust assets outstanding. Since 1976, the Sponsor has serviced over
one million retail investor accounts, opened through retail distribution
firms. Van Kampen Merritt Inc. is the sponsor of the various series of the
trusts listed below and the distributor of the mutual funds and closed-end
funds listed below. Unitholders may only invest in the trusts, mutual funds
and closed-end funds which are registered for sale in the state of residence
of such Unitholder. In order for a Unitholder to invest in the trusts, mutual
funds and closed-end funds listed below, such Unitholder must obtain a
prospectus relating to the trust or fund involved. A prospectus is the only
means by which an offer can be delivered to investors.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF TRUST TRUST INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
<S> <C>
Insured Municipals Income Trust................ Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities
California Insured Municipals Income Trust..... Double tax-exemption for California residents by investing in insured
California municipal securities
New York Insured Municipals Income Trust....... Double and in certain cases triple tax-exemption for New York residents
by investing in insured New York municipal securities
Pennsylvania Insured Municipals Income Trust... Double and in certain cases triple tax-exemption for Pennsylvania
residents by investing in insured Pennsylvania municipal securities
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Insured Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities; all
Multi-Series................................. issuers of bonds in a state trust are located in such state or in
(Premium Bond Series, National, Limited territories or possessions of the United States-- providing
Maturity, Intermediate, Short Intermediate, exemptions from all state income tax for residents of such state
Discount, Alabama, Arizona, California, (except for the Oklahoma IM-IT Trust where a portion of the income of
California Intermediate, California the Trust is subject to the Oklahoma state income tax)
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, California
Premium, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida,
Florida Intermediate, Florida Intermediate
Laddered Maturity, Georgia, Louisiana,
Massachusetts, Massachusetts Premium,
Michigan, Michigan Intermediate, Michigan
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, Michigan
Premium, Minnesota, Missouri, Missouri Inter-
mediate Laddered Maturity, Missouri Premium,
New Jersey, New Jersey Intermediate Laddered
Maturity, New Mexico, New York, New York
Intermediate, New York Intermediate Laddered
Maturity, New York Limited Maturity, Ohio,
Ohio Intermediate, Ohio IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity, Ohio Premium, Oklahoma,
Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Intermediate,
Pennsylvania Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
Pennsylvania Premium, Tennessee, Texas,
Washington, West Virginia)
Insured Tax Free Bond Trust.................... Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities
Insured Tax Free Bond Trust, Insured Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities; all
Multi-Series................................. issuers of bonds in a state trust are located in such state--providing
(National, Limited Maturity, New York) exemptions from state income tax for residents of such state
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 59
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF TRUST TRUST INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE (Continued)
<S> <C>
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust............ Tax-exempt income by investing in municipal securities
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Tax-exempt income by investing in municipal securities; all issuers of
Multi-Series................................. bonds in a state trust are located in such state or in territories or
(National, National AMT, Intermediate, possessions of the United States--providing exemptions from state
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, income tax for residents of such state
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Virginia)
Investors' Quality Municipals Trust, AMT Tax-exempt income for investors not subject to the alternative minimum
Series....................................... tax by investing in municipal securities, some or all of which are
subject to the Federal alternative minimum tax
Investors' Corporate Income Trust.............. Taxable income by investing in corporate bonds
Investors' Governmental Securities--Income Taxable income by investing in government-backed GNMA securities
Trust........................................
Van Kampen Merritt International Bond Income High current income through an investment in a diversified portfolio of
Trust........................................ foreign currency denominated corporate debt obligations
Van Kampen Merritt Insured Income Trust........ High current income consistent with preservation of capital through a
diversified investment in a fixed portfolio of insured, long-term or
intermediate-term corporate debt securities
Van Kampen Merritt Utility Income Trust........ High dividend income and capital appreciation by investing in common
stock of electric utilities
Van Kampen Merritt Blue Chip Opportunity Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income by investing
Trust........................................ in a portfolio of actively traded, New York Stock Exchange listed
equity securities which are components of the Dow Jones Industrial
Average*
Van Kampen Merritt Blue Chip Opportunity and Protect Unitholders' capital and provide the potential for capital
Treasury Trust............................... appreciation and income by investing a portion of its portfolio in
"zero coupon" U.S. Treasury obligations and the remainder of the
trust's portfolio in actively traded, New York Stock Exchange listed
equity securities which at the time of the creation of the trust were
components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average*
Van Kampen Merritt Emerging Markets Income High current income consistent with preservation of capital through a
Trust........................................ diversified investment in a fixed portfolio primarily consisting of
Brady Bonds of emerging market countries that have restructured
sovereign debt pursuant to the framework of the Brady Plan
Van Kampen Merritt Global Telecommunications Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income consistent
Trust........................................ with the preservation of invested capital, by investing in a portfolio
of equity securities which provide equipment for or services to the
telecommunications industry.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF MUTUAL FUND FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
<S> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt U.S. Government Fund........ High current income by investing in U.S. Government securities
Van Kampen Merritt Insured Tax Free Income High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in
Fund.......................................... insured municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Income Fund....... High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free High Income Fund... High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in
medium and lower grade municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt California Insured Tax Free High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes by
Fund.......................................... investing in insured California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt High Yield Fund............. Provide a high level of current income by investing in medium and lower
grade domestic and foreign government and corporate debt securities.
The Fund will seek capital appreciation as a secondary objective
Van Kampen Merritt Growth and Income Fund...... Long-term growth of both capital and dividend income by investing in
dividend paying common stocks
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Tax Free Income High current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania state and
Fund.......................................... local income taxes by investing in medium and lower grade Pennsylvania
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Money Market Fund........... High current income by investing in a broad range of money market
instruments that will mature within twelve months
Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free Money Fund......... High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in a
broad range of municipal securities that will mature within twelve
months
Van Kampen Merritt Short-Term Global Income High current income by investing in a global portfolio of high quality
Fund.......................................... debt securities denominated in various currencies having remaining
maturities of not more than three years
Van Kampen Merritt Adjustable Rate U.S. High level of current income with a relatively stable net asset value
Government Fund............................... investing in U.S. Government securities
Van Kampen Merritt Limited Term Municipal High level of current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent
Income Fund................................... with preservation of capital.
</TABLE>
* The Dow Jones Industrial Average is the property of Dow Jones & Company,
Inc. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. has not granted to the Trust or the Sponsor a
license to use the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
<PAGE>
60 Trust Administration
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF CLOSED-END FUND FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
<S> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Income Trust...... High current income exempt from Federal income taxes with safety of
principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of investment grade
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt California Municipal High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes
Trust......................................... with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Intermediate Term High High current income while seeking to preserve shareholders' capital by
Income Trust.................................. investing in a diversified portfolio of high yield fixed income
securities
Van Kampen Merritt Limited Term High Income High current income while seeking to preserve shareholders' capital by
Trust......................................... investing in a diversified portfolio of high yield fixed income
securities
Van Kampen Merritt Prime Rate Income Trust..... High current income, consistent with preservation of capital by
investing in interests in floating or variable rate senior loans
Van Kampen Merritt Investment Grade Municipal High current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent with
Trust......................................... preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Trust............. High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt California Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes
Trust......................................... with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Florida Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal income taxes and Florida
Trust......................................... intangible personal property taxes with safety of principal by
investing in a diversified portfolio of investment grade Florida
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt New York Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal as well as New York State and
Trust......................................... New York City income taxes with safety of principal by investing in a
diversified portfolio of investment grade New York municipal
securities
Van Kampen Merritt Ohio Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal and Ohio income taxes with
Trust......................................... safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade Ohio municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Quality High current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania income taxes
Municipal Trust............................... with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade Pennsylvania municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Municipals.................................... with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Insured High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Municipals.................................... with preservation of capital by investing in a diversified portfolio of
municipal securities which are covered by insurance with respect to
timely payment of principal and interest
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal and California income
CA Municipals................................. taxes, consistent with preservation of capital by investing in a
diversified portfolio of California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes,
FL Municipals................................. consistent with preservation of capital. The Fund also seeks to offer
its Shareholders the opportunity to own securities exempt from Florida
intangible personal property taxes
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and New
NJ Municipals................................. Jersey gross income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal as well as from New
NY Municipals................................. York State and New York City income taxes, consistent with
preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
PA Municipals................................. income taxes and, where possible under local law, local income and
property taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Opportunity High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Trust......................................... with preservation of capital by investing in a diversified portfolio of
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Municipal Income High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Trust......................................... with preservation of capital by investing in a diversified portfolio of
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Pennsylvania High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
Municipal Income Trust........................ income taxes and, where possible under local law, local income and
property taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Strategic Sector Municipal Provide common shareholders with a high level of current income exempt
Trust......................................... from Federal income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Value Municipal Income High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes,
Trust......................................... consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt California Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal and California income
Income Trust.................................. taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Massachusetts Value High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and
Municipal Income Trust........................ Massachusetts personal income taxes, consistent with preservation of
capital
Van Kampen Merritt New Jersey Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and New
Income Trust.................................. Jersey gross income tax, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt New York Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal as well as New York
Income Trust.................................. State and New York City income taxes, consistent with preservation of
capital
Van Kampen Merritt Ohio Value Municipal Income High level of current income exempt from Federal and Ohio income taxes,
Trust......................................... consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
Income Trust.................................. income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 61
If the Sponsor shall fail to perform any of its duties under the Trust
Agreement or become incapable of acting or become bankrupt or its affairs are
taken over by public authorities, then the Trustee may (i) appoint a successor
Sponsor at rates of compensation deemed by the Trustee to be reasonable and
not exceeding amounts prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
(ii) terminate the Trust Agreement and liquidate the Fund as provided therein
or (iii) continue to act as Trustee without terminating the Trust Agreement.
All costs and expenses incurred in creating and establishing the Fund,
including the cost of the initial preparation, printing and execution of the
Trust Agreement and the certificates, legal and accounting expenses,
advertising and selling expenses, expenses of the Trustee, initial evaluation
fees and other out-of-pocket expenses have been borne by the Sponsor at no
cost to the Fund.
COMPENSATION OF SPONSOR AND EVALUATOR. The Sponsor will not receive any
fees in connection with its activities relating to the Fund. However, American
Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment
Advisory Corp., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation of the Sponsor,
will receive an annual supervisory fee as indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information" for providing portfolio supervisory services
for the Fund. Such fee (which is based on the number of Units outstanding in
each Trust on January 1 of each year) may exceed the actual costs of providing
such supervisory services for this Fund, but at no time will the total amount
received for portfolio supervisory services rendered to Insured Municipals
Income Trust, 1st Insured Multi-Series and subsequent series and to any other
unit investment trusts sponsored by the Sponsor for which the Evaluator
provides portfolio supervisory services in any calendar year exceed the
aggregate cost to the Evaluator of supplying such services in such year. In
addition, the Evaluator shall receive an annual evaluation fee as indicated
under "Summary of Essential Financial Information" for regularly evaluating
each Trust's portfolio. Both of the foregoing fees may be increased without
approval of the Unitholders by amounts not exceeding proportionate increases
under the category "All Services Less Rent of Shelter" in the Consumer Price
Index published by the United States Department of Labor or, if such category
is no longer published, in a comparable category. The Sponsor and the
Underwriters will receive sales commissions and may realize other profits (or
losses) in connection with the sale of Units and the deposit of the Securities
as described under "General--Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation" below.
TRUSTEE. The Trustee is The Bank of New York, a trust company organized
under the laws of New York. The Bank of New York has its offices at 101
Barclay Street, New York, New York 10286 (800) 221-7668. The Bank of New York
is subject to supervision and examination by the Superintendent of Banks of
the State of New York and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation to the extent permitted by law.
The duties of the Trustee are primarily ministerial in nature. It did not
participate in the selection of Bonds for the portfolios of any of the Trusts.
In accordance with the Trust Agreement, the Trustee shall keep proper
books of record and account of all transactions at its office for the Fund.
Such records shall include the name and address of, and the certificates
issued by the Fund to, every Unitholder of the Fund. Such books and records
shall be open to inspection by any Unitholder at all reasonable times during
the usual business hours. The Trustee shall make such annual or other reports
as may from time to time be required under any applicable state or Federal
statute, rule or regulation (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Reports Provided"). The Trustee is required to keep a certified copy
or duplicate original of the Trust Agreement on file in its office available
for inspection at all reasonable times during the usual business hours by any
Unitholder, together with a current list of the Securities held in the Fund.
Under the Trust Agreement, the Trustee or any successor trustee may
resign and be discharged of the trusts created by the Trust Agreement by
executing an instrument in writing and filing the same with the Sponsor. The
Trustee or successor trustee must mail a copy of the notice of resignation to
all Fund Unitholders then of record, not less than 60 days before the date
specified in such notice when such resignation is to take effect. The Sponsor
upon receiving notice of such resignation is obligated to appoint a successor
trustee promptly. If, upon such resignation, no successor trustee has been
appointed and has accepted the appointment within 30 days after notification,
the retiring Trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the
appointment of a successor. The Sponsor may remove the Trustee and appoint a
successor trustee as provided in the Trust Agreement at any time with or
without cause. Notice of such removal and appointment shall be mailed to each
Unitholder by the Sponsor. Upon execution of a written acceptance of such
appointment by such successor trustee, all the rights, powers, duties and
obligations of
<PAGE>
62 Trust Administration
the original trustee shall vest in the successor. The resignation or removal
of a Trustee becomes effective only when the successor trustee accepts its
appointment as such or when a court of competent jurisdiction appoints a
successor trustee.
Any corporation into which a Trustee may be merged or with which it may
be consolidated, or any corporation resulting from any merger or consolidation
to which a Trustee shall be a party, shall be the successor trustee. The
Trustee must be a banking corporation organized under the laws of the United
States or any state and having at all times an aggregate capital, surplus and
undivided profits of not less than $5,000,000.
TRUSTEE'S FEE. For its services the Trustee will receive an annual fee
based on the largest aggregate outstanding principal amount of Securities in
each Trust as of the opening of business on January 2 and July 2 of each year
as set forth under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust. During the
first year the Trustee may agree to reduce its fee (and to the extent
necessary pay miscellaneous expenses of a Trust) as stated under "Per Unit
Information" for the applicable Trust. The Trustee's fees are payable monthly
on or before the fifteenth day of each month from the Interest Account of each
Trust to the extent funds are available and then from the Principal Account of
each Trust, with such payments being based on each Trust's portion of such
expenses. Since the Trustee has the use of the funds being held in the
Principal and Interest Accounts for future distributions, payment of expenses
and redemptions and since such Accounts are non-interest bearing to
Unitholders, the Trustee benefits thereby. Part of the Trustee's compensation
for its services to each Trust is expected to result from the use of these
funds. Such fees may be increased without approval of the Unitholders by
amounts not exceeding proportionate increases under the category "All Services
Less Rent of Shelter" in the Consumer Price Index published by the United
States Department of Labor or, if such category is no longer published, in a
comparable category. The Trustee's fees will not be increased in future years
in order to make up any reduction in the Trustee's fees described under "Per
Unit Information" for the applicable Trust. For a discussion of the services
rendered by the Trustee pursuant to its obligations under the Trust Agreement,
see "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Reports Provided" and "Trustee"
above.
PORTFOLIO ADMINISTRATION. The Trustee is empowered to sell, for the
purpose of redeeming Units tendered by any Unitholder, and for the payment of
expenses for which funds may not be available, such of the Bonds designated by
the Evaluator as the Trustee in its sole discretion may deem necessary. The
Evaluator, in designating such Securities, will consider a variety of factors,
including (a) interest rates, (b) market value and (c) marketability. In
connection with the Insured Trusts to the extent that Bonds are sold which are
current in payment of principal and interest in order to meet redemption
requests and defaulted Bonds are retained in the portfolio in order to
preserve the related insurance protection applicable to said Bonds, the
overall quality of the Bonds remaining in such Trust's portfolio will tend to
diminish. Except as described in this section and in certain other unusual
circumstances for which it is determined by the Trustee to be in the best
interests of the Unitholders or if there is no alternative, the Trustee is not
empowered to sell Bonds from an Insured Trust which are in default in payment
of principal or interest or in significant risk of such default and for which
value has been attributed for the insurance obtained by such Insured Trust.
Because of such restrictions on the Trustee under certain circumstances, the
Sponsor may seek a full or partial suspension of the right of Unitholders to
redeem their Units in an Insured Trust. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Redemption of Units". The Sponsor is empowered, but not obligated,
to direct the Trustee to dispose of Bonds in the event of an advanced
refunding.
The Sponsor is required to instruct the Trustee to reject any offer made
by an issuer of any of the Securities to issue new obligations in exchange or
substitution for any Security pursuant to a refunding or refinancing plan,
except that the Sponsor may instruct the Trustee to accept or reject such an
offer or to take any other action with respect thereto as the Sponsor may deem
proper if (1) the issuer is in default with respect to such Security or (2) in
the written opinion of the Sponsor the issuer will probably default with
respect to such Security in the reasonably foreseeable future. Any obligation
so received in exchange or substitution will be held by the Trustee subject to
the terms and conditions of the Trust Agreement to the same extent as
Securities originally deposited thereunder. Within five days after the deposit
of obligations in exchange or substitution for underlying Securities, the
Trustee is required to give notice thereof to each Unitholder of the Trust
thereby affected, identifying the Securities eliminated and the Securities
substituted therefor. Except as stated herein and under "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts" regarding the substitution of
Replacement Bonds for Failed Bonds, the acquisition by the Fund of any
securities other than the Securities initially deposited is not permitted.
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 63
If any default in the payment of principal or interest on any Security
occurs and no provision for payment is made therefor within 30 days, the
Trustee is required to notify the Sponsor thereof. If the Sponsor fails to
instruct the Trustee to sell or to hold such Security within 30 days after
notification by the Trustee to the Sponsor of such default, the Trustee may in
its discretion sell the defaulted Security and not be liable for any
depreciation or loss thereby incurred.
SPONSOR PURCHASES OF UNITS. The Trustee shall notify the Sponsor of any
tender of Units for redemption. If the Sponsor's bid in the secondary market
at that time equals or exceeds the Redemption Price per Unit, it may purchase
such Units by notifying the Trustee before the close of business on the second
succeeding business day and by making payment therefor to the Unitholder not
later than the day on which the Units would otherwise have been redeemed by
the Trustee. Units held by the Sponsor may be tendered to the Trustee for
redemption as any other Units.
The offering price of any Units acquired by the Sponsor will be in accord
with the Public Offering Price described in the then currently effective
prospectus describing such Units. Any profit resulting from the resale of such
Units will belong to the Sponsor which likewise will bear any loss resulting
from a lower offering or Redemption Price subsequent to its acquisition of
such Units.
INSURANCE PREMIUMS. The cost of the portfolio insurance obtained by the
respective Trusts, if any, is that amount shown in footnote (5) in "Notes to
Portfolios", so long as such Trust retains the Bonds. Premiums, which are
obligations of each Insured Trust, are payable monthly by the Trustee on
behalf of the respective Trust. As Bonds in the portfolio of an Insured Trust
are redeemed by their respective issuers or are sold by the Trustee, the
amount of the premium will be reduced in respect of those Bonds no longer
owned by and held in such Trust. If the Trustee exercises the right to obtain
permanent insurance, the premiums payable for such permanent insurance will be
paid solely from the proceeds of the sale of the related Bonds. The premiums
for such permanent insurance with respect to each Bond will decline over the
life of the Bond. A Trust does not incur any expense for Preinsured Bond
insurance, since the premium or premiums for such insurance have been paid by
the issuer or the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Preinsured Bonds in a
Trust. Preinsured Bonds are not additionally insured by an Insured Trust.
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES. The following additional charges are or may be
incurred by the Trusts: (a) fees of the Trustee for extraordinary services,
(b) expenses of the Trustee (including legal and auditing expenses) and of
counsel designated by the Sponsor, (c) various governmental charges, (d)
expenses and costs of any action taken by the Trustee to protect the Trusts
and the rights and interests of Unitholders, (e) indemnification of the
Trustee for any loss, liability or expenses incurred by it in the
administration of the Fund without negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct
on its part, (f) any special custodial fees payable in connection with the
sale of any of the Bonds in a Trust and (g) expenditures incurred in
contacting Unitholders upon termination of the Trusts.
The fees and expenses set forth herein are payable out of the Trusts.
When such fees and expenses are paid by or owing to the Trustee, they are
secured by a lien on the portfolio or portfolios of the applicable Trust or
Trusts. If the balances in the Interest and Principal Accounts are
insufficient to provide for amounts payable by the Fund, the Trustee has the
power to sell Securities to pay such amounts.
GENERAL
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION. The Sponsor and the Trustee have the power to
amend the Trust Agreement without the consent of any of the Unitholders when
such an amendment is (a) to cure an ambiguity or to correct or supplement any
provision of the Trust Agreement which may be defective or inconsistent with
any other provision contained therein or (b) to make such other provisions as
shall not adversely affect the interest of the Unitholders (as determined in
good faith by the Sponsor and the Trustee), provided that the Trust Agreement
may not be amended to increase the number of Units issuable thereunder or to
permit the deposit or acquisition of securities either in addition to or in
substitution for any of the Securities initially deposited in the Fund, except
for the substitution of certain refunding securities for such Securities. In
the event of any amendment, the Trustee is obligated to notify promptly all
Unitholders of the substance of such amendment.
A Trust may be terminated at any time by consent of Unitholders of 51% of
the Units of such Trust then outstanding or by the Trustee when the value of
such Trust, as shown by any semi-annual evaluation, is less than that
indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information". A Trust will be
liquidated by the Trustee in the event that a sufficient number of Units not
yet sold are tendered for redemption by the Underwriters, including the
Sponsor,
<PAGE>
64 Trust Administration
so that the net worth of such Trust would be reduced to less than 40% of the
initial principal amount of such Trust. If a Trust is liquidated because of
the redemption of unsold Units by the Underwriters, the Sponsor will refund to
each purchaser of Units the entire sales charge paid by such purchaser. The
Trust Agreement provides that each Trust shall terminate upon the redemption,
sale or other disposition of the last Security held in such Trust, but in no
event shall it continue beyond the end of the year preceding the fiftieth
anniversary of the Trust Agreement in the case of an IM-IT or a State Trust
(other than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) or beyond the end of
the year preceding the twentieth anniversary of the Trust Agreement in the
case of an IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust. In the event of
termination of the Fund or any Trust, written notice thereof will be sent by
the Trustee to each Unitholder of such Trust at his address appearing on the
registration books of the Fund maintained by the Trustee. Within a reasonable
time thereafter the Trustee shall liquidate any Securities then held in such
Trust and shall deduct from the funds of such Trust any accrued costs,
expenses or indemnities provided by the Trust Agreement, including estimated
compensation of the Trustee and costs of liquidation and any amounts required
as a reserve to provide for payment of any applicable taxes or other
governmental charges. The sale of Securities in the Trust upon termination may
result in a lower amount than might otherwise be realized if such sale were
not required at such time. For this reason, among others, the amount realized
by a Unitholder upon termination may be less than the principal amount of
Securities represented by the Units held by such Unitholder. The Trustee shall
then distribute to each Unitholder his share of the balance of the Interest
and Principal Accounts. With such distribution the Unitholder shall be
furnished a final distribution statement of the amount distributable. At such
time as the Trustee in its sole discretion shall determine that any amounts
held in reserve are no longer necessary, it shall make distribution thereof to
Unitholders in the same manner.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with final distributions to
Unitholders of an Insured Trust, it should be noted that because the portfolio
insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is applicable only while Bonds so
insured are held by such Trust, the price to be received by such Trust upon
the disposition of any such Bond which is in default, by reason of nonpayment
of principal or interest, will not reflect any value based on such insurance.
Therefore, in connection with any liquidation, it shall not be necessary for
the Trustee to, and the Trustee does not currently intend to, dispose of any
Bond or Bonds if retention of such Bond or Bonds, until due, shall be deemed
to be in the best interest of Unitholders, including, but not limited to,
situations in which a Bond or Bonds so insured are in default and situations
in which a Bond or Bonds so insured have deteriorated market prices resulting
from a significant risk of default. Since the Preinsured Bonds will reflect
the value of the related insurance, it is the present intention of the Sponsor
not to direct the Trustee to hold any of such Preinsured Bonds after the date
of termination. All proceeds received, less applicable expenses, from
insurance on defaulted Bonds not disposed of at the date of termination will
ultimately be distributed to Unitholders of record as of such date of
termination as soon as practicable after the date such defaulted Bond or Bonds
become due and applicable insurance proceeds have been received by the
Trustee.
LIMITATION ON LIABILITIES. The Sponsor, the Evaluator and the Trustee
shall be under no liability to Unitholders for taking any action or for
refraining from taking any action in good faith pursuant to the Trust
Agreement, or for errors in judgment, but shall be liable only for their own
willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their
duties or by reason of their reckless disregard of their obligations and
duties hereunder. The Trustee shall not be liable for depreciation or loss
incurred by reason of the sale by the Trustee of any of the Securities. In the
event of the failure of the Sponsor to act under the Trust Agreement, the
Trustee may act thereunder and shall not be liable for any action taken by it
in good faith under the Trust Agreement.
The Trustee shall not be liable for any taxes or other governmental
charges imposed upon or in respect of the Securities or upon the interest
thereon or upon it as Trustee under the Trust Agreement or upon or in respect
of the Fund which the Trustee may be required to pay under any present or
future law of the United States of America or of any other taxing authority
having jurisdiction. In addition, the Trust Agreement contains other customary
provisions limiting the liability of the Trustee.
The Trustee, Sponsor and Unitholders may rely on any evaluation furnished
by the Evaluator and shall have no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
Determinations by the Evaluator under the Trust Agreement shall be made in
good faith upon the basis of the best information available to it; provided,
however, that the Evaluator shall be under no liability to the Trustee,
Sponsor or Unitholders for errors in judgment. This provision shall not
protect the Evaluator in any case of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross
negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties.
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 65
UNIT DISTRIBUTION. During the initial offering period, Units will be
distributed to the public by Underwriters, broker-dealers and others (see
"Underwriting") at the Public Offering Price, plus accrued interest computed
as described above under "Unitholder Explanations--Interest Earning
Schedule--Accrued Interest (Accrued Interest to Carry)". Upon the completion
of the initial offering, Units repurchased in the secondary market, if any,
may be offered by this Prospectus at the secondary Public Offering Price in
the manner described.
The Sponsor intends to qualify the Units for sale in a number of states.
Broker-dealers or others will be allowed a concession or agency commission in
connection with the distribution of Units during the initial offering period
of $20.00 per Unit for less than 100 Units, $22.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $21.50 per Unit for any single transaction of
250 to 499 Units, $24.50 per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999
Units and $24.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units of
a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust, and in the case of an IM-IT
Limited Maturity Trust, $27.00 per Unit for less than 100 Units, $31.00 per
Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $30.50 per Unit for any
single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $33.50 per Unit for any single
transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $31.00 per Unit for any single transaction
of 1,000 or more Units, and in the case of an IM-IT or a State Trust (other
than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) $30.00 per Unit for less
than 100 Units, $36.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249
Units, $38.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $39.00
per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $39.00 per Unit
for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units, provided that such Units
are acquired either from the Sponsor (in the case of dealer transactions) or
through the Sponsor (in the case of transactions involving brokers or others).
The increased concession or agency commission is a result of the discount
given to purchasers for quantity purchases. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General". Certain commercial banks are making
Units of the Fund available to their customers on an agency basis. A portion
of the sales charge paid by these customers (equal to the agency commission
referred to above) is retained by or remitted to the banks. Under the
Glass-Steagall Act, banks are prohibited from underwriting Units of the Fund;
however, the Glass-Steagall Act does permit certain agency transactions and
the banking regulators have not indicated that these particular agency
transactions are not permitted under such Act. In addition, state securities
laws on this issue may differ from the interpretations of federal law
expressed herein and banks and financial institutions may be required to
register as dealers pursuant to state law. Any quantity discount (see
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--General") provided to investors
will be borne by the selling dealer or agent. For secondary market
transactions, such concession or agency commission will amount to 70% of the
applicable sales charge as determined using the table found in "Unitholder
Explanations-- Public Offering".
To facilitate the handling of transactions during the initial offering
period, sales of Units shall normally be limited to transactions involving a
minimum of five Units. Further purchases may be made in multiples of one Unit.
The minimum purchase in the secondary market will be one Unit.
The Sponsor reserves the right to reject, in whole or in part, any order
for the purchase of Units and to change the amount of the concession or agency
commission to dealers and others from time to time. See "Underwriting".
SPONSOR AND UNDERWRITER COMPENSATION. The Underwriters will receive a
gross sales commission equal to that percentage of the Public Offering Price
of the Units (excluding Purchased Interest) as indicated under "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" less any reduced sales charges
for quantity purchases as described under "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--General".
The Sponsor will receive from the Underwriters the excess of such gross
sales commission over $35.00, $29.00, $27.00, $22.00, $22.00 and $35.00 per
Unit of any Quality, IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, IM-IT Short
Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity and other Insured Trusts,
respectively, as of the Date of Deposit. In connection with quantity sales to
purchasers of any IM-IT, State Trust (other than a State Intermediate Laddered
Maturity Trust) or Quality Trust the Underwriters will receive from the
Sponsor commissions totalling $37.00 per Unit for any single transaction of
100 to 249 Units, $39.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499
Units, $40.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and
$39.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units. In
connection with quantity sales to purchasers of any State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust the Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor
commissions totalling $23.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249
Units, $23.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $24.75
per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $24.00 per Unit
for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units. In connection with quantity
sales to purchasers of any Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust the Underwriters will
receive from the Sponsor commissions
<PAGE>
66 Trust Administration
totalling $35.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units,
$36.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $37.00 per
Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $38.00 per Unit for
any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units. In addition, any Underwriter
that sells a total of 25% or 1,500 Units, whichever is greater, of any
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust will receive an additional $2.00 per each such Unit.
In connection with quantity sales to purchasers of any IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust the Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor commissions totalling
$32.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $32.00 per
Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $34.50 per Unit for any
single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $31.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 1,000 or more Units. A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. ("Edwards"),
which in 1983 entered into a 10 year agreement with the Sponsor to act as a
Managing Underwriter of Units of the various series of the IM-IT and the IM-IT
Limited Maturity Trust, will receive reimbursement from the Sponsor for
certain costs and further compensation in the amount of $5.00 for each Unit of
both the IM-IT and the IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust it underwrites. See
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--General". If The Principal/Eppler,
Guerin & Turner, Inc. commits (on the Date of Deposit) to underwrite a total
of 4,000 or more Units of this series of the IM-IT Trust, any other series of
the IM-IT and/or any series of the Texas Insured Municipals Income Trust
during any calendar month, then The Principal/ Eppler, Guerin & Turner, Inc.
will receive an additional $1.00 per Unit for each of the Units of such Trust
it commits to underwrite in said month. Further, each Underwriter who
underwrites 1,000 or more Units in any Trust will receive additional
compensation from the Sponsor of $1.00 for each Unit it underwrites. In
addition, the Sponsor and certain of the Underwriters will realize a profit or
the Sponsor will sustain a loss, as the case may be, as a result of the
difference between the price paid for the Securities by the Sponsor and the
cost of such Securities to a Trust (which is based on the determination by
Interactive Data Services, Inc. of the aggregate offering price of the
underlying Securities in such Trust on the Date of Deposit). See
"Underwriting" and "Portfolio" for the applicable Trust and "Notes to
Portfolios". The Sponsor and the Underwriters may also realize profits or
sustain losses with respect to Securities deposited in each Trust which were
acquired by the Sponsor from underwriting syndicates of which they were
members. The Sponsor has participated as sole underwriter or as manager or as
a member of the underwriting syndicates from which none of the aggregate
principal amount of the Securities in the portfolios of the Fund were
acquired. The Underwriters may further realize additional profit or loss
during the initial offering period as a result of the possible fluctuations in
the market value of the Securities in each Trust after the Date of Deposit,
since all proceeds received from purchasers of Units (excluding dealer
concessions or agency commissions allowed, if any) will be retained by the
Underwriters. Affiliates of an Underwriter are entitled to the same dealer
concessions or agency commissions that are available to the Underwriter.
As stated under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Market for
Units", the Sponsor intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may,
maintain a secondary market for the Units of the Fund. In so maintaining a
market, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses in
the amount of any difference between the price at which Units are purchased
and the price at which Units are resold (which price is based on the bid
prices of the Securities in such Trust and includes a sales charge). In
addition, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses
resulting from a redemption of such repurchased Units at a price above or
below the purchase price for such Units, respectively.
<PAGE>
Other Matters 67
OTHER MATTERS
LEGAL OPINIONS. The legality of the Units offered hereby and certain
matters relating to Federal tax law have been passed upon by Chapman and
Cutler, 111 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603, as counsel for the
Sponsor. Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone has acted as special counsel to
the Fund for Michigan tax matters. Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul has acted as
special counsel to the Fund for Pennsylvania tax matters. Tanner Propp &
Farber has acted as counsel for the Trustee and as special counsel to the Fund
for New York tax matters. None of the special counsel for the Fund has
expressed any opinion regarding the completeness or materiality of any matters
contained in this Prospectus other than the tax opinion set forth under "Tax
Status" relating to the Trust for which it has provided an opinion.
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. The statements of condition and
the related securities portfolios at the Date of Deposit included in this
Prospectus have been audited by Grant Thornton, independent certified public
accountants, as set forth in their report in this prospectus, and are included
herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
FEDERAL TAX STATUS
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, under
existing law:
(1)Each Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation for
Federal income tax purposes and interest and accrued original issue
discount on Bonds which is excludable from gross income under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") will retain its status when
distributed to Unitholders, except to the extent such interest is
subject to the alternative minimum tax, an additional tax on branches
of foreign corporations and the environmental tax (the "Superfund
Tax"), as noted below;
(2)Each Unitholder is considered to be the owner of a pro rata portion
of the respective Trust under subpart E, subchapter J of chapter 1 of
the Code and will have a taxable event when such Trust disposes of a
Bond, or when the Unitholder redeems or sells his Units. Unitholders
must reduce the tax basis of their Units for their share of accrued
interest received by the respective Trust, if any, on Bonds delivered
after the Unitholders pay for their Units to the extent that such
interest accrued on such Bonds during the period from the Unitholder's
settlement date to the date such Bonds are delivered to the respective
Trust and, consequently, such Unitholders may have an increase in
taxable gain or reduction in capital loss upon the disposition of such
Units. Gain or loss upon the sale or redemption of Units is measured
by comparing the proceeds of such sale or redemption with the adjusted
basis of the Units. If the Trustee disposes of Bonds (whether by sale,
payment on maturity, redemption or otherwise), gain or loss is
recognized to the Unitholder. The amount of any such gain or loss is
measured by comparing the Unitholder's pro rata share of the total
proceeds from such disposition with the Unitholder's basis for his or
her fractional interest in the asset disposed of. In the case of a
Unitholder who purchases Units, such basis (before adjustment for
earned original issue discount and amortized bond premium, if any) is
determined by apportioning the cost of the Units among each of the
Trust assets ratably according to value as of the date of acquisition
of the Units. The tax cost reduction requirements of the Code relating
to amortization of bond premium may, under some circumstances, result
in the Unitholder realizing a taxable gain when his Units are sold or
redeemed for an amount equal to his original cost;
(3)Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy or policies dated the
Date of Deposit, issued to an Insured Trust by AMBAC Indemnity,
Financial Guaranty or a combination thereof with respect to the Bonds
which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the
Trustee will be excludable from Federal gross income if, and to the
same extent as, such interest would have been so excludable if paid by
the issuer of the defaulted obligations; and
(4)Any proceeds paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of
Bonds which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held
by the Trustee will be excludable from Federal gross income if, and to
the same extent as, such interest would have been excludable if paid
in the normal course by the issuer of the defaulted obligations.
<PAGE>
68 Other Matters
Sections 1288 and 1272 of the Code provide a complex set of rules
governing the accrual of original issue discount. These rules provide that
original issue discount accrues either on the basis of a constant compound
interest rate or ratably over the term of the Bond, depending on the date the
Bond was issued. In addition, special rules apply if the purchase price of a
Bond exceeds the original issue price plus the amount of original issue
discount which would have previously accrued based upon its issue price (its
"adjusted issue price") to prior owners. The application of these rules will
also vary depending on the value of the Bond on the date a Unitholder acquires
his Units and the price the Unitholder pays for his Units. Investors with
questions regarding these Code sections should consult with their tax
advisers.
"The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993" (the "Tax Act") subjects
tax-exempt bonds to the market discount rules of the Code effective for bonds
purchased after April 30, 1993. In general, market discount is the amount (if
any) by which the stated redemption price at maturity exceeds an investor's
purchase price (except to the extent that such difference, if any, is
attributable to original issue discount not yet accrued). Market discount can
arise based on the price a Trust pays for Bonds or the price a Unitholder pays
for his or her Units. Under the Tax Act, accretion of market discount is
taxable as ordinary income; under prior law the accretion had been treated as
capital gain. Market discount that accretes while a Trust holds a Bond would
be recognized as ordinary income by the Unitholders when principal payments
are received on the Bond, upon sale or at redemption (including early
redemption), or upon the sale or redemption of his or her Units, unless a
Unitholder elects to include market discount in taxable income as it accrues.
The market discount rules are complex and Unitholders should consult their tax
advisers regarding these rules and their application.
In the case of certain corporations, the alternative minimum tax and the
Superfund Tax for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986 depends upon
the corporation's alternative minimum taxable income, which is the
corporation's taxable income with certain adjustments. One of the adjustment
items used in computing the alternative minimum taxable income and the
Superfund Tax of a corporation (other than an S Corporation, Regulated
Investment Company, Real Estate Investment Trust, or REMIC) is an amount equal
to 75% of the excess of such corporation's "adjusted current earnings" over an
amount equal to its alternative minimum taxable income (before such adjustment
item and the alternative tax net operating loss deduction). "Adjusted current
earnings" includes all tax exempt interest, including interest on all of the
Bonds in the Fund. Unitholders are urged to consult their tax advisers with
respect to the particular tax consequences to them including the corporate
alternative minimum tax, the Superfund Tax and the branch profits tax imposed
by Section 884 of the Code.
Counsel for the Sponsor has also advised that under Section 265 of the
Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry
Units of a Trust is not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. The
Internal Revenue Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need
not be directly traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units (however, these
rules generally do not apply to interest paid on indebtedness incurred to
purchase or improve a personal residence). Also, under Section 265 of the
Code, certain financial institutions that acquire Units would generally not be
able to deduct any of the interest expense attributable to ownership of such
Units. Investors with questions regarding this issue should consult with their
tax advisers.
In the case of certain of the Bonds in the Fund, the opinions of bond
counsel indicate that interest on such Bonds received by a "substantial user"
of the facilities being financed with the proceeds of these Bonds, or persons
related thereto, for periods while such Bonds are held by such a user or
related person, will not be excludible from Federal gross income, although
interest on such Bonds received by others would be excludible from Federal
gross income. "Substantial user" and "related person" are defined under U.S.
Treasury Regulations. Any person who believes that he or she may be a
"substantial user" or a "related person" as so defined should contact his or
her tax adviser.
In the opinion of Tanner Propp & Farber, special counsel to the Fund for
New York tax matters, under existing law, the Fund and each Trust are not
associations taxable as corporations and the income of each Trust will be
treated as the income of the Unitholders under the income tax laws of the
State and City of New York.
All statements of law in the Prospectus concerning exclusion from gross
income for Federal, state or other tax purposes are the opinions of counsel
and are to be so construed.
At the respective times of issuance of the Bonds, opinions relating to
the validity thereof and to the exclusion of interest thereon from Federal
gross income are rendered by bond counsel to the respective issuing
authorities.
<PAGE>
Other Matters 69
Neither the Sponsor nor Chapman and Cutler has made any special review for the
Fund of the proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds or of the basis
for such opinions.
In the case of corporations, the alternative tax rate applicable to
long-term capital gains is 35%, effective for long-term capital gains realized
in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1993. For taxpayers other
than corporations, net capital gains are subject to a maximum marginal stated
tax rate of 28%. However, it should be noted that legislative proposals are
introduced from time to time that affect tax rates and could affect relative
differences at which ordinary income and capital gains are taxed. Under the
Code, taxpayers must disclose to the Internal Revenue Service the amount of
tax-exempt interest earned during the year.
Section 86 of the Code, in general, provides that 50% of Social Security
benefits are includible in gross income to the extent that the sum of
"modified adjusted gross income" plus 50% of the Social Security benefits
received exceeds a "base amount". The base amount is $25,000 for unmarried
taxpayers, $32,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return and zero for
married taxpayers who do not live apart at all times during the taxable year
and who file separate returns. Modified adjusted gross income is adjusted
gross income determined without regard to certain otherwise allowable
deductions and exclusions from gross income and by including tax-exempt
interest. To the extent that Social Security benefits are includible in gross
income, they will be treated as any other item of gross income.
In addition, under the Tax Act, for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 1993, up to 85% of Social Security benefits are includible in
gross income to the extent that the sum of "modified adjusted gross income"
plus 50% of Social Security benefits received exceeds an "adjusted base
amount." The adjusted base amount is $34,000 for unmarried taxpayers, $44,000
for married taxpayers filing a joint return, and zero for married taxpayers
who do not live apart at all times during the taxable year and who file
separate returns.
Although tax-exempt interest is included in modified adjusted gross
income solely for the purpose of determining what portion, if any, of Social
Security benefits will be included in gross income, no tax-exempt interest,
including that received from a Trust, will be subject to tax. A taxpayer whose
adjusted gross income already exceeds the base amount or the adjusted base
amount must include 50% or 85%, respectively, of his Social Security benefits
in gross income whether or not he receives any tax-exempt interest. A taxpayer
whose modified adjusted gross income (after inclusion of tax-exempt interest)
does not exceed the base amount need not include any Social Security benefits
in gross income.
For a discussion of the state tax status of income earned on Units of a
Trust, see "Tax Status" for the applicable Trust. Except as noted therein, the
exemption of interest on state and local obligations for Federal income tax
purposes discussed above does not necessarily result in exemption under the
income or other tax laws of any State or City. The laws of the several States
vary with respect to the taxation of such obligations.
<PAGE>
70 Other Matters
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS*
STANDARD & POOR'S CORPORATION. A Standard & Poor's Corporation
("Standard & Poor's") corporate or municipal bond rating is a current
assessment of the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific
debt obligation. This assessment of creditworthiness may take into
consideration obligors such as guarantors, insurers or lessees.
The bond rating is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a security,
inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price.
The ratings are based on current information furnished to Standard &
Poor's by the issuer and obtained by Standard & Poor's from other sources it
considers reliable. The ratings may be changed, suspended or withdrawn as a
result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information.
The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following
considerations:
I. Likelihood of default--capacity and willingness of the obligor as to
the timely payment of interest
and repayment of principal in accordance
with the terms of the obligation.
II. Nature of and provisions of the obligation.
III. Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in
the event of bankruptcy,
reorganization or other arrangements under the
laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights.
AAA--This is the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's to a debt
obligation and indicates an extremely strong capacity to pay principal and
interest.
AA--Bonds rated AA also qualify as high-quality debt obligations.
Capacity to pay principal and interest is very strong, and in the majority of
instances they differ from AAA issues only in small degree.
A--Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay principal and interest,
although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes
in circumstances and economic conditions.
BBB--Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate
protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances
are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay
principal for debt in this category than in higher rated categories.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): To provide more detailed indications of credit
quality, the ratings from "AA" to "BBB" may be modified by the addition of a
plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating
categories.
Provisional Ratings: A provisional rating ("p") assumes the successful
completion of the project being financed by the issuance of the bonds being
rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements is largely or
entirely dependent upon the successful and timely completion of the project.
This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to
completion, makes no comment on the likelihood of, or the risk of default upon
failure of, such completion. Accordingly, the investor should exercise his own
judgment with respect to such likelihood and risk.
MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. A brief description of the applicable
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") rating symbols and their meanings
follows:
Aaa--Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be the best quality. They
carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as
"gilt edge". Interest payments are protected by a large, or by an
exceptionally stable, margin and principal is secure. While the various
protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized
are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues.
With the occasional exception of oversupply in a few specific instances, the
safety of obligations of this class is so absolute that their market value is
affected solely by money market fluctuations.
Aa--Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all
standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known
as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins
of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuations of
protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements
present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in
*As published by the rating companies.
<PAGE>
Other Matters 71
Aaa securities. These Aa bonds are high grade, their market value virtually
immune to all but money market influences, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
A--Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes
and are to be considered as higher medium grade obligations. Factors giving
security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may
be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the
future. The market value of A-rated bonds may be influenced to some degree by
credit circumstances during a sustained period of depressed business
conditions. During periods of normalcy, bonds of this quality frequently move
in parallel with Aaa and Aa obligations, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
Baa--Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade
obligations; i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured.
Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but
certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically
unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding
investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as
well.
Moody's bond rating symbols may contain numerical modifiers of a generic
rating classification. The modifier 1 indicates that the bond ranks at the
high end of its category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and
the modifier 3 indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic
rating category.
Con--Bonds for which the security depends upon the completion of some act
or the fulfillment of some condition are rated conditionally. These are bonds
secured by (a) earnings of projects under construction, (b) earnings of
projects unseasoned in operating experience, (c) rentals which begin when
facilities are completed, or (d) payments to which some other limiting
condition attaches. Parenthetical rating denotes probable credit stature upon
completion of construction or elimination of basis of condition.
<PAGE>
72 Other Matters
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of Van Kampen Merritt Inc. and the Unitholders
of Insured Municipals Income Trust, 152nd Insured Multi-Series (IM-IT,
IM-IT Limited Maturity, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts):
We have audited the accompanying statements of condition and the
related portfolios of Insured Municipals Income Trust, 152nd Insured
Multi-Series (IM-IT, IM-IT Limited Maturity, Michigan IM-IT, New York
IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts) as
of January 6, 1994. The statements of condition and portfolios are the
responsibility of the Sponsor. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on such financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included
confirmation of irrevocable letters of credit deposited to purchase
tax-exempt securities by correspondence with the Trustee. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by the Sponsor, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Insured
Municipals Income Trust, 152nd Insured Multi-Series (IM-IT, IM-IT
Limited Maturity, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered
Maturity and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts) as of January 6, 1994, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Chicago, Illinois GRANT THORNTON
January 6, 1994
<PAGE>
Other Matters 73
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
AS OF THE DATE OF DEPOSIT: JANUARY 6, 1994
<CAPTION>
NEW YORK
IM-IT
INTERMEDIATE
IM-IT LIMITED MICHIGAN LADDERED PENNSYLVANIA
INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES IM-IT MATURITY TRUST IM-IT TRUST MATURITY TRUST IM-IT TRUST
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Contracts to purchase tax-exempt securities
<F1><F2><F4>.............................. $ 9,543,505 $ 4,879,884 $ 3,351,153 $ 3,056,203 $ 4,304,016
Accrued interest to the First Settlement
Date <F1><F4>............................. 68,821 45,815 30,534 15,231 33,234
Total.............................. $ 9,612,326 $ 4,925,699 $ 3,381,687 $ 3,071,434 $ 4,337,250
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability--
Accrued interest payable to Sponsor
<F1><F4>................................ $ -- $ 4,407 $ 349 $ -- $ --
Interest of Unitholders--
Cost to investors <F3>................ 10,104,000 5,140,550 3,554,000 3,165,928 4,559,000
Less: Gross underwriting commission <F3>.. 491,674 219,258 172,662 94,494 221,750
Net interest to Unitholders
<F1><F3><F4>..................... 9,612,326 4,921,292 3,381,338 3,071,434 4,337,250
Total.............................. $ 9,612,326 $ 4,925,699 $ 3,381,687 $ 3,071,434 $ 4,337,250
<FN>
<F1> The aggregate value of the Securities listed under "Portfolio" for each
Trust herein, and their cost to such Trust are the same. The value of the
Securities is determined by Interactive Data Services, Inc. on the bases
set forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering
Price". The contracts to purchase tax-exempt Securities are
collateralized by irrevocable letters of credit which have been deposited
with the Trustee in and for the following amounts:
OFFERING ACCRUED
PRINCIPAL PRICE INTEREST TO
AMOUNT OF AMOUNT OF OF BONDS EXPECTED
LETTER OF BONDS UNDER UNDER DELIVERY
CREDIT CONTRACTS CONTRACTS DATES
IM-IT........................................... $ 9,607,787 $ 9,870,000 $ 9,543,505 $ 64,282
IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust.................... $ 4,922,536 $ 5,000,000 $ 4,879,884 $ 42,652
Michigan IM-IT Trust............................ $ 3,379,660 $ 3,485,000 $ 3,351,153 $ 28,507
New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust........................ $ 3,070,181 $ 3,075,000 $ 3,056,203 $ 13,978
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust........................ $ 4,334,143 $ 4,425,000 $ 4,304,016 $ 30,127
<F2> Insurance coverage providing for timely payment, when due, of all
principal and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been
obtained either by such Trusts, by a prior owner of the Bonds or by the
issuers of the Bonds involved. Such insurance does not guarantee the
market value of the Bonds or the value of the Units. The insurance
obtained by the Insured Trusts is effective only while Bonds thus insured
are held in such Trusts. Neither the bid nor offering prices of the
underlying Bonds or of the Units, absent situations in which bonds are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of
such default, include value, if any, attributable to the insurance
obtained by such Trusts.
<F3> The aggregate public offering price (exclusive of interest) and the
aggregate sales charge are computed on the bases set forth under
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" and "Trust
Administration--General-- Sponsor and Underwriter Profits" and assume all
single transactions involve less than 100 Units. For single transactions
involving 100 or more Units, the sales charge is reduced (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General") resulting in an equal reduction
in both the Cost to investors and the Gross underwriting commission while
the Net interest to Unitholders remains unchanged.
<F4> Accrued interest on the underlying Securities represents the interest
accrued as of the First Settlement Date from the later of the last
payment date on the Securities or the date of issuance thereof. The
Trustee may advance to the Trust a portion of the accrued interest on the
underlying Securities for distribution to the Sponsor as the Unitholder
of record as of the First Settlement Date. A portion of the accrued
interest ("Purchased Interest") on the underlying Securities, as
indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information", is payable
by investors and is included in the Public Offering Price. Purchased
Interest is the difference between Accrued interest to the First
Settlement Date and Accrued interest payable to Sponsor.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
74 Other Matters
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLES
As of the date of this prospectus, the following tables show the
approximate taxable estimated current returns for individuals that are
equivalent to tax-exempt estimated current returns under combined Federal and
State taxes (where applicable) using the published Federal and State tax rates
(where applicable) scheduled to be in effect in 1994. They incorporate
increased tax rates for higher income taxpayers that were included in the
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. These tables illustrate approximately what
you would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt
estimated current return in your income tax bracket. For cases in which more
than one State bracket falls within a Federal bracket, the highest State
bracket is combined with the Federal bracket. The combined State and Federal
tax rates shown reflect the fact that State tax payments are currently
deductible for Federal tax purposes. The tables do not show the approximate
taxable estimated current returns for individuals that are subject to the
alternative minimum tax. The taxable equivalent estimated current returns may
be somewhat higher than the equivalent returns indicated in the following
tables for those individuals who have adjusted gross incomes in excess of
$111,800. The tables do not reflect the effect of limitations on itemized
deductions and the deduction for personal exemptions. They were designed to
phase out certain benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers.
These limitations, in effect, raise the marginal maximum Federal tax rate to
approximately 44 percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to
four personal exemptions and to approximately 41 percent for taxpayers filing
a single return entitled to only one personal exemption. These limitations are
subject to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed
and the total amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the
limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to lose more than
80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions. See "Other
Matters--Federal Tax Status" for a more detailed discussion of recent Federal
tax legislation, including a discussion of provisions affecting corporations.
<TABLE>
IM-IT
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET 4 1/2% 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 15% 5.29% 5.88% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24% 8.82%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 28 6.25 6.94 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72 10.42
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 31 6.52 7.25 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14 10.87
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 36 7.03 7.81 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94 11.72
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 39.6 7.45 8.28 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59 12.42
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
LIMITED MATURITY
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET 4 1/2% 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 15% 5.29% 5.88% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24% 8.82%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 28 6.25 6.94 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72 10.42
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 31 6.52 7.25 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14 10.87
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 36 7.03 7.81 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94 11.72
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 39.6 7.45 8.28 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59 12.42
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
MICHIGAN
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET* 4 1/2% 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 21.9% 5.73% 6.37% 7.01% 7.68% 8.32% 8.96% 9.60%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 33.8 6.77 7.52 8.27 9.06 9.82 10.57 11.33
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 36.6 7.05 7.84 8.62 9.46 10.25 11.04 11.83
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 41.2 7.61 8.46 9.31 10.20 11.05 11.90 12.76
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 44.5 8.06 8.96 9.86 10.81 11.71 12.61 13.51
</TABLE>
*The combined tax brackets reflect Federal and State income and State
intangibles taxes but do not reflect the effect of the exemption from local
income taxes; accordingly, Michigan residents subject to such local income
taxes would need a somewhat higher taxable estimated current return than those
shown to equal the tax-exempt estimated current return of the Trust. It should
be noted that legislation is pending in the Michigan legislature that would
repeal the State intangibles tax and which therefore would affect the
appropriate taxable estimated current returns set forth in the table. However,
no prediction is made that any such legislation will be enacted.
<PAGE>
Other Matters 75
<TABLE>
NEW YORK INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET* 4% 4 1/2% 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 21.5% 5.10% 5.73% 6.37% 7.01% 7.64% 8.28% 8.92%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 33.5 6.02 6.77 7.52 8.27 9.02 9.77 10.53
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 36.2 6.27 7.05 7.84 8.62 9.40 10.19 10.97
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 40.9 6.77 7.61 8.46 9.31 10.15 11.00 11.84
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 44.2 7.17 8.06 8.96 9.86 10.75 11.65 12.54
</TABLE>
*Combined Federal and State tax bracket was computed assuming that the
investor is not subject to local income taxes, such as New York City taxes.
Should a Unitholder reside in a locality which imposes an income tax, the
Unitholder's equivalent taxable estimated current return would be greater than
the equivalent taxable estimated current returns indicated in the table. The
table does not reflect the recent enactment of a New York State supplemental
income tax based upon a taxpayer's New York State taxable income and New York
State adjusted gross income. This supplemental tax results in an increased
marginal State income tax rate to the extent a taxpayer's New York State
adjusted gross income ranges between $100,000 and $150,000. In addition, the
table does not reflect the amendments to the New York State income tax law
that imposed limitations on the deductibility of itemized deductions. The
application of the New York State supplemental income tax and limitation on
itemized deductions may result in a higher combined Federal, State and local
tax rate than indicated in the table.
<TABLE>
PENNSYLVANIA
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET* 4 1/2% 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 17.4% 5.45% 6.05% 6.66% 7.26% 7.87% 8.47% 9.09%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 30 6.43 7.14 7.86 8.57 9.29 10.00 10.71
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 32.9 6.71 7.45 8.20 8.94 9.69 10.43 11.18
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 37.8 7.23 8.04 8.84 9.65 10.45 11.25 12.06
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 41.3 7.67 8.52 9.37 10.22 11.07 11.93 12.78
</TABLE>
*The table does not reflect the effect of the exemption of the Trust from
local personal property taxes and from the Philadelphia School District
Investment Net Income Tax, accordingly; residents of Pennsylvania subject to
such taxes would need a higher taxable estimated current return than those
shown to equal the tax-exempt estimated current return of the Trust.
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns
with the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trusts and returns over specified periods on other similar Van Kampen
Merritt sponsored unit investment trusts with returns on taxable investments
such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank CDs and money market accounts
or money market funds, each of which has investment characteristics that may
differ from those of the Trusts. U.S. Government bonds, for example, are
backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government and bank CDs and
money market accounts are insured by an agency of the federal government.
Money market accounts and money market funds provide stability of principal,
but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition of the short-term debt
market. The investment characteristics of the Trusts are described more fully
elsewhere in this Prospectus.
<PAGE>
76 Other Matters
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS
The tables below set forth the per Unit estimated distributions of
interest, principal and rebates of Purchased Interest to Unitholders. The
tables assume no changes in expenses, no changes in the current interest
rates, no exchanges, redemptions, sales or prepayments of the underlying
Securities prior to maturity or expected retirement date and the receipt of
principal upon maturity or expected retirement date. To the extent the
foregoing assumptions change actual distributions will vary.
<TABLE>
IM-IT
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
February 1994 2.54 2.54
March 1994 - February 2004 4.24 4.24
March 2004 4.24 66.80 .52 71.56
April 2004 - December 2004 3.91 3.91
January 2005 3.91 111.34 .81 116.06
February 2005 - June 2005 3.40 3.40
July 2005 3.24 55.92 .47 59.63
August 2005 3.11 3.11
September 2005 3.03 29.69 .22 32.94
October 2005 2.97 2.97
November 2005 2.97 98.97 .72 102.66
December 2005 2.51 148.46 1.08 152.05
January 2006 1.83 49.48 .37 51.68
February 2006 - June 2013 1.60 1.60
July 2013 1.60 98.97 .70 101.27
August 2013 - December 2016 1.16 1.16
January 2017 1.16 98.98 .70 100.84
February 2017 - April 2020 .71 .71
May 2020 .71 49.98 50.69
June 2020 - August 2023 .72 .72
September 2023 .55 69.28 .49 70.32
October 2023 - December 2023 .41 .41
January 2024 .41 98.97 .73 100.11
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 77
<TABLE>
IM-IT LIMITED MATURITY TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
February 1994 $ 2.39 $ 2.39
March 1994 - March 2003 3.98 3.98
April 2003 3.98 $ 36.00 $.31 40.29
May 2003 - August 2005 3.83 3.83
September 2005 3.72 46.00 .42 50.14
October 2005 - January 2006 3.62 3.62
February 2006 3.62 60.00 .52 64.14
March 2006 - April 2007 3.37 3.37
May 2007 3.11 100.00 .98 104.09
June 2007 - August 2007 2.89 2.89
September 2007 2.80 40.00 .34 43.14
October 2007 2.73 2.73
November 2007 2.73 93.00 .84 96.57
December 2007 2.32 2.32
January 2008 2.32 50.00 52.32
February 2008 2.32 125.00 .94 128.26
March 2008 - June 2008 1.87 1.87
July 2008 1.87 90.00 .85 92.72
August 2008 1.45 1.45
September 2008 .98 210.00 1.80 212.78
October 2008 - November 2008 .57 .57
December 2008 .57 150.00 1.28 151.85
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
78 Other Matters
<TABLE>
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
February 1994 $ 2.45 $ 2.45
March 1994 - March 2005 4.09 4.09
April 2005 4.09 $140.68 $ 1.38 146.15
May 2005 3.41 140.69 1.29 145.39
June 2005 - October 2005 2.78 2.78
November 2005 2.78 46.42 .43 49.63
December 2005 - October 2006 2.57 2.57
November 2006 2.15 171.64 1.61 175.40
December 2006 - December 2015 1.79 1.79
January 2016 1.79 182.89 1.60 186.28
February 2016 - April 2018 1.01 1.01
May 2018 1.01 42.21 .37 43.59
June 2018 - April 2019 .83 .83
May 2019 .83 47.83 48.66
June 2019 - April 2021 .83 .83
May 2021 .83 168.83 1.47 171.13
June 2021 - May 2023 .11 .11
June 2023 .11 39.39 .34 39.84
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 79
<TABLE>
NEW YORK IM-IT INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
February 1994 $ 2.08 $ 2.08
March 1994 - June 2000 3.46 3.46
July 2000 3.46 $113.82 $.54 117.82
August 2000 3.08 3.08
September 2000 2.93 81.30 .40 84.63
October 2000 - May 2001 2.79 2.79
June 2001 2.62 162.60 .85 166.07
July 2001 2.20 40.65 .19 43.04
August 2001 - January 2002 2.06 2.06
February 2002 2.06 113.82 .58 116.46
March 2002 - June 2002 1.65 1.65
July 2002 1.65 94.31 .40 96.36
August 2002 - January 2003 1.36 1.36
February 2003 1.36 24.39 25.75
March 2003 - June 2003 1.36 1.36
July 2003 1.08 130.08 .73 131.89
August 2003 - October 2003 .84 .84
November 2003 .84 43.90 .23 44.97
December 2003 - January 2004 .67 .67
February 2004 .67 45.53 .24 46.44
March 2004 - August 2004 .50 .50
September 2004 .27 113.82 .61 114.70
October 2004 .06 .06
November 2004 35.78 .18 35.96
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
80 Other Matters
<TABLE>
PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
February 1994 2.43 2.43
March 1994 - May 2003 4.05 4.05
June 2003 3.72 142.57 1.12 147.41
July 2003 - February 2004 3.42 3.42
March 2004 3.11 130.51 1.03 134.65
April 2004 - November 2004 2.84 2.84
December 2004 2.84 109.67 .87 113.38
January 2005 - November 2005 2.35 2.35
December 2005 2.05 120.64 .98 123.67
January 2006 1.79 80.07 .63 82.49
February 2006 - November 2010 1.43 1.43
December 2010 1.18 109.67 .83 111.68
January 2011 - September 2016 .97 .97
October 2016 .97 30.71 31.68
November 2016 - June 2019 .97 .97
July 2019 .73 115.15 .79 116.67
August 2019 - September 2033 .52 .52
October 2033 .21 131.61 1.04 132.86
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
<PAGE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
<PAGE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
<PAGE>
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representations
not contained in this Prospectus; and any information or representation not
contained herein must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the
Fund, the Sponsor or the Underwriters. This Prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in any state
to any person to whom it is not lawful to make such offer in such state.
Title Page
INTRODUCTION..................................... 2
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION....... 3
UNITHOLDER EXPLANATIONS.......................... 5
Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts............... 5
The Fund...................................... 5
Objectives and Securities Selection........... 6
Portfolio Concentrations...................... 8
Replacement Bonds............................. 10
Bond Redemptions.............................. 11
Distributions................................. 12
Certificates.................................. 12
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated
Long-Term Returns............................. 12
Interest Earning Schedule....................... 13
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Interest
Income...................................... 13
Purchased and Accrued Interest.................. 14
Purchased Interest............................ 14
Accrued Interest.............................. 14
Public Offering................................. 14
General....................................... 14
Offering Price................................ 15
Market for Units.............................. 17
Distributions of Interest and Principal....... 17
Reinvestment Option........................... 18
Redemption of Units........................... 19
Reports Provided.............................. 20
Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts.... 20
IM-IT............................................ 28
IM-IT LIMITED MATURITY TRUST..................... 30
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST............................. 32
NEW YORK IM-IT INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY
TRUST........................................... 37
PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST......................... 47
NOTES TO PORTFOLIOS.............................. 53
UNDERWRITING..................................... 55
TRUST ADMINISTRATION............................. 58
Fund Administration and Expenses................ 58
Sponsor....................................... 58
Compensation of Sponsor and Evaluator......... 61
Trustee....................................... 61
Trustee's Fee................................. 62
Portfolio Administration...................... 62
Sponsor Purchases of Units.................... 63
Insurance Premiums............................ 63
Miscellaneous Expenses........................ 63
General......................................... 63
Amendment or Termination...................... 63
Limitation on Liabilities..................... 64
Unit Distribution............................. 65
Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation.......... 65
OTHER MATTERS.................................... 67
Legal Opinions.................................. 67
Independent Certified Public Accountants........ 67
FEDERAL TAX STATUS............................... 67
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS................ 70
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS..................................... 71
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION.......................... 72
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
TABLES.......................................... 73
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS.............. 75
This Prospectus contains information concerning the Fund and the Sponsor, but
does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statements and exhibits relating thereto, which the fund has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act
of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and to which reference is
hereby made.
(R) denotes a registered trademark of Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
P R O S P E C T U S
January 6, 1994
LOGO
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST, 152ND INSURED MULTI-SERIES
IM-IT 314
IM-IT 72nd Limited Maturity
Michigan IM-IT 112
New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Series 9
Pennsylvania IM-IT 181
LOGO
<PAGE>
One Parkview Plaza (R)
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Mellon Bank Center
1735 Market Street, Suite 1300
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Please retain this Prospectus for future reference.
