File No. 33-54975
CIK #896709
Securities And Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-6
For Registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of Securities of Unit
Investment Trusts Registered on Form N-8B-2.
A. Exact Name of Trust: Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors'
Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230
B. Name of Depositor: Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
C. Complete address of Depositor's principal executive offices:
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
D. Name and complete address of agents for service:
Chapman and Cutler Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
Attention: Mark J. Kneedy Attention: John C. Merritt, Chairman
111 W. Monroe Street One Parkview Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60603 Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
E. Title and amount of securities being registered: 50,549* Units
F. Proposed maximum offering price to the public of the securities being
registered:
($1020 per Unit**): $51,559,980
G. Amount of filing fee, computed at one twenty-ninth of 1 percent of proposed
maximum aggregate offering
price to the public: $17,779.27 ($351.72 previously paid)
H. Approximate date of proposed sale to the public:
as soon as practicable after the Effective Date of the Registration Statement
/ X /:Check box if it is proposed that this filing will become effective on
August 24, 1994 pursuant to Rule 487.
33,699 Units registered for primary distribution.
16,850 Units registered for resale by Depositor of Units previously sold
in primary distribution.
** Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee.
Form N-8B-2 Form S-6
Item Number Heading in Prospectus
Insured Municipals Income Trust and
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust
Multi-Series 230
Cross Reference Sheet
Pursuant to Rule 404(c) of Regulation C
under the Securities Act of 1933
(Form N-8B-2 Items Required by Instruction
1 as to Prospectus on Form S-6)
Form N-8B-2 Form S-6
Item Number Heading in Prospectus
I. Organization and General Information
1. (a) Name of trust )
(b) Title of securities issued ) Prospectus Front Cover Page
2. Name and address of Depositor ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Trust Administration
3. Name and address of Trustee ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Trust Administration
4. Name and address of principal ) Underwriting
underwriter )
5. Organization of trust ) Introduction
6. Execution and termination of ) Introduction
Trust Indenture and Agreement ) Trust Administration
7. Changes of Name ) *
8. Fiscal year ) *
9. Material Litigation ) *
II. General Description of the Trust and Securities of the Trust
10. General information regarding ) Introduction
trust's securities and rights) Unitholder Explanations
of security holders ) Trust Information
) Trust Administration
11. Type of securities comprising ) Introduction
units ) Trust Information
) Trust Portfolios
12. Certain information regarding ) *
periodic payment certificates)
13. (a) Load, fees, charges and ) Introduction
expenses ) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Information
) Trust Administration
(b) Certain information regard-) *
ing periodic payment plan)
certificates )
(c) Certain percentages ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Unitholder Explanations
(d) Certain other fees, ) Unitholder Explanations
expenses or charges ) Trust Administration
payable by holders )
(e) Certain profits to be ) Unitholder Explanations
received by depositor, ) Underwriting
principal underwriter, ) Notes to Portfolios
trustee or affiliated )
persons )
(f) Ratio of annual charges ) *
to income )
14. Issuance of trust's securities ) Unitholder Explanations
15. Receipt and handling of payments) *
from purchasers )
16. Acquisition and disposition of ) Introduction
underlying securities ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
17. Withdrawal or redemption ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
18. (a) Receipt and disposition ) Introduction
of income ) Unitholder Explanations
(b) Reinvestment of distribu- ) *
tions )
(c) Reserves or special funds ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
(d) Schedule of distributions ) *
19. Records, accounts and reports ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
20. Certain miscellaneous provisions) Trust Administration
of Trust Agreement )
21. Loans to security holders ) *
22. Limitations on liability ) Trust Portfolios
) Trust Administration
23. Bonding arrangements ) *
24. Other material provisions of ) *
trust indenture or agreement )
III. Organization, Personnel and Affiliated Persons of Depositor
25. Organization of Depositor ) Trust Administration
26. Fees received by Depositor ) Trust Administration
27. Business of Depositor ) Trust Administration
28. Certain information as to )
officials and affiliated ) *
persons of Depositor )
29. Companies owning securities of ) *
Depositor )
30. Controlling persons of Depositor) *
31. Compensation of Directors ) *
32. Compensation of Directors ) *
33. Compensation of Employees ) *
34. Compensation to other persons ) Unitholder Explanations
IV. Distribution and Redemption of Securities
35. Distribution of trust's ) Introduction
securities by states ) Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts
36. Suspension of sales of trust's ) *
securities )
37. Revocation of authority to ) *
distribute )
38. (a) Method of distribution )
(b) Underwriting agreements ) Unitholder Explanations
(c) Selling agreements )
39. (a) Organization of principal )
underwriter )
) Trust Administration
(b) N.A.S.D. membership by )
principal underwriter )
40. Certain fees received by ) *
principal underwriter )
41. (a) Business of principal ) Trust Administration
underwriter )
(b) Branch offices of principal) *
underwriter )
(c) Salesmen of principal ) *
underwriter )
42. Ownership of securities of the ) *
trust )
43. Certain brokerage commissions )
received by principal ) *
underwriter )
44. (a) Method of valuation ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
(b) Schedule as to offering ) *
price )
(c) Variation in offering price) Unitholder Explanations
to certain persons )
45. Suspension of redemption rights) *
46. (a) Redemption valuation ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
(b) Schedule as to redemption ) *
price )
47. Purchase and sale of interests ) Unitholder Explanations
in underlying securities ) Trust Administration
V. Information Concerning the Trustee or Custodian
48. Organization and regulation of ) Trust Administration
trustee )
49. Fees and expenses of trustee ) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Trust Administration
50. Trustee's lien ) Trust Administration
VI. Information Concerning Insurance of Holders of Securities
51. Insurance of holders of trust's)
securities ) *
VII. Policy of Registrant
52. (a) Provisions of trust agree-)
ment with respect to )
replacement or elimi- ) Trust Administration
nation of portfolio )
securities )
(b) Transactions involving )
elimination of underlying) *
securities )
(c) Policy regarding substitu-) Trust Administration
tion or elimination of )
underlying securities )
(d) Fundamental policy not ) *
otherwise covered )
53. Tax Status of trust ) Trust Information
) Other Matters
VIII. Financial and Statistical Information
54. Trust's securities during ) *
last ten years )
55. )
)
56. Certain information regarding ) *
)
57. Periodic payment certificates )
58. )
59. Financial statements (Instruc- ) Other Matters
tions 1(c) to Form S-6) )
__________________________________
* Inapplicable, omitted, answer negative or not required
Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold
nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration
statement becomes effective. This Prospectus shall not constitute an
offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be
any sale of these securities in any State in which such offer,
solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or
qualification under the securities laws of any State.
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED AUGUST 24, 1994
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
August 24, 1994 Van Kampen Merritt
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST AND
INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST, MULTI-SERIES 230
IM-IT 94th Short Intermediate Florida IM-IT 83 Hawaii Quality 1
IM-IT 76th Limited Maturity Michigan IM-IT 119 Oregon Quality 53
California IM-IT 131 New York IM-IT 121 Virginia Quality 61
In the opinion of counsel, interest to the Fund and to Unitholders, with
certain exceptions, is excludable under existing law from gross income for
Federal income taxes. In addition, the interest income of each State Trust is,
in the opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state and local
taxes, when held by residents of the state where the issuers of Bonds in such
Trust are located. Capital gains, if any, are subject to Federal tax.
THE FUND. The objectives of the Fund are Federal and, in the case of a
State Trust, state tax-exempt income and conservation of capital through an
investment in a diversified portfolio of tax-exempt bonds. The Fund consists
of nine underlying separate unit investment trusts designated as Insured
Municipals Income Trust, 94th Short Intermediate Series (the "IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust"), Insured Municipals Income Trust, 76th Limited Maturity
Series (the "IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust"), California Insured Municipals
Income Trust, Series 131 (the "California IM-IT Trust"), Florida Insured
Municipals Income Trust, Series 83 (the "Florida IM-IT Trust"), Michigan
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 119 (the "Michigan IM-IT Trust"), New
York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 121 (the "New York IM-IT Trust"),
Hawaii Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 1 (the "Hawaii Quality
Trust"), Oregon Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 53 (the "Oregon
Quality Trust") and Virginia Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 61
(the "Virginia Quality Trust"). The various trusts are collectively referred
to herein as the "Trusts", the California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan
IM-IT, New York IM-IT, Hawaii Quality, Oregon Quality and Virginia Quality
Trusts are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "State Trusts",
while the IM-IT Short Intermediate, IM-IT Limited Maturity, California IM-IT,
Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT and New York IM-IT Trusts are sometimes
collectively referred to herein as the "Insured Trusts" and the Hawaii
Quality, Oregon Quality and Virginia Quality Trusts are sometimes collectively
referred to herein as the "Quality Trusts". Each Trust initially consists of
delivery statements relating to contracts to purchase securities and,
thereafter, will consist of such securities as may continue to be held (the
"Bonds" or "Securities"). Such Securities are interest-bearing obligations
issued by or on behalf of municipalities and other governmental authorities,
the interest on which is, in the opinion of recognized bond counsel to the
issuing governmental authority, exempt from all Federal income taxes under the
existing law. In addition, the interest income of each State Trust is, in the
opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state and local taxes,
when held by residents of the state where the issuers of Bonds in such Trust
are located.
"AAA" RATING FOR THE INSURED TRUSTS ONLY. Insurance guaranteeing the
payments of principal and interest, when due, on the Securities in the
portfolio of each Insured Trust has been obtained from a municipal bond
insurance company either by such Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds involved,
by a prior owner of the Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such
Bonds in an Insured Trust. See "Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the
Bonds in the Insured Trusts" on page 22. Insurance obtained by an Insured
Trust applies only while Bonds are retained in such Trust while insurance
obtained on Preinsured Bonds is effective so long as such Bonds are
outstanding. The Trustee, upon the sale of a Bond insured under an insurance
policy obtained by an Insured Trust, has a right to obtain from the insurer
involved permanent insurance for such Bond upon the payment of a single
predetermined insurance premium and any expenses related thereto from the
proceeds of the sale of such Bond. INSURANCE RELATES ONLY TO THE BONDS IN A
TRUST AND NOT TO THE UNITS OFFERED HEREBY OR TO THE MARKET VALUE THEREOF. As a
result of such insurance, the Units of each Insured Trust have received a
rating of "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation. Standard & Poor's
Corporation has indicated that this rating is not a recommendation to buy,
hold or sell Units nor does it take into account the extent to which expenses
of each Insured Trust or sales by each Insured Trust of Bonds for less than
the purchase price paid by such Trust will reduce payments to Unitholders of
the interest and principal required to be paid on such Bonds. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts". No representation
is made as to any insurer's ability to meet its commitments.
PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE. The Public Offering Price of the Units of each
Trust during the initial offering period is equal to the aggregate offering
price of the Securities in such Trust's portfolio and cash, if any, in the
Principal Account held or owned by such Trust Fund plus the applicable sales
charge plus Purchased Interest and accrued interest, if any. After the initial
public offering period, the secondary market Public Offering Price of each
Trust will be equal to the aggregate bid price of the Securities in such Trust
and cash, if any, in the Principal Account held or owned by such Trust Fund
plus the applicable sales charge plus Purchased Interest and accrued interest,
if any. Sales charges for the Trusts in the initial market, expressed both as
a percentage of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest) and
as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are set
forth in footnote (2) under "Summary of Essential Financial Information". For
sales charges in the secondary market, see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering". If the Securities in each Trust were available for direct purchase
by investors, the purchase price of the Securities would not include the sales
charge included in the Public Offering Price of the Units. During the initial
offering period, the sales charge is reduced on a graduated scale for sales
involving at least 100 Units. If Units were available for purchase at the
close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit , the Public Offering
Price per Unit would have been that amount set forth in the "Summary of
Essential Financial Information" for each Trust. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering".
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS
A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
<PAGE>
2 Introduction
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN AND ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN. The annual
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return to Unitholders as of
the close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit were as set forth
under "Per Unit Information" for each Trust. The methods of calculating
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are set forth in the
footnotes to the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust.
OBJECTIVES OF THE FUND. The objectives of the Fund are income exempt from
Federal income tax and, in the case of a State Trust, Federal and state income
tax (if any) and conservation of capital through an investment in diversified
portfolios of Federal and state tax-exempt obligations. There is, of course,
no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its objectives. The Fund may be an
appropriate investment vehicle for investors who desire to participate in a
portfolio of tax-exempt fixed income securities with greater diversification
than they might be able to acquire individually. In addition, securities of
the type deposited in the Fund are often not available in small amounts.
DISTRIBUTIONS. Purchasers of Units will receive distributions on a
monthly basis. See "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the
Trusts". Record dates will be the first day of each month. Distributions will
be made on the fifteenth day of the month subsequent to the respective record
dates.
MARKET FOR UNITS. Although not obligated to do so, the Sponsor, Van
Kampen Merritt Inc., intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may,
maintain a secondary market for the Units at prices based upon the aggregate
bid prices of the Securities in the respective Trusts plus Purchased Interest;
however, during the initial offering period such prices will be based upon the
aggregate offering prices of the Securities plus Purchased Interest. If such a
market is not maintained and no other over-the-counter market is available, a
Unitholder will be able to dispose of his Units only through redemption at
prices based upon the bid prices of the underlying Securities plus Purchased
Interest (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Redemption of Units"
and "Unitholder Explanations-- Public Offering--Market for Units").
REINVESTMENT OPTION. Unitholders have the opportunity to have their
distributions reinvested into an open-end, management investment company as
described herein. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering-- Reinvestment
Option".
RISK FACTORS. An investment in the Trusts should be made with an
understanding of the risks associated therewith, including, among other
factors, the inability of the issuer or an insurer to pay the principal of or
interest on a bond when due, volatile interest rates, early call provisions,
and changes to the tax status of the Bonds. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Risk Factors".
<PAGE>
Summary of Essential Financial Information 3
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
AND INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST,
MULTI-SERIES 230
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON THE DAY BEFORE
THE DATE OF DEPOSIT: AUGUST 23, 1994
SPONSOR: VAN KAMPEN MERRITT INC.
EVALUATOR: AMERICAN PORTFOLIO EVALUATION SERVICES
(A DIVISION OF A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SPONSOR)
TRUSTEE: THE BANK OF NEW YORK
<CAPTION>
IM-IT SHORT
INTERMEDIATE IM-IT LIMITED CALIFORNIA FLORIDA MICHIGAN
GENERAL INFORMATION TRUST MATURITY TRUST IM-IT TRUST IM-IT TRUST IM-IT TRUST
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of
Securities in Trust............. $ 7,015,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 3,060,000 $ 3,050,000 $ 3,145,000
Number of Units................... 7,015 5,000 3,053 3,036 3,095
Fractional Undivided Interest in
the Trust per Unit.............. 1/7,015 1/5,000 1/3,053 1/3,036 1/3,095
Principal Amount (Par Value) of
Securities per Unit <F1>........ $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,002.29 $ 1,004.61 $ 1,016.16
Public Offering Price:
Aggregate Offering Price of
Securities in Portfolio....... $ 6,923,515 $ 4,843,092 $ 2,881,588 $ 2,859,516 $ 2,915,040
Aggregate Offering Price of
Securities per Unit........... $ 986.96 $ 968.62 $ 943.85 $ 941.87 $ 941.85
Sales Charge <F2>............. $ 30.51 $ 43.52 $ 48.63 $ 48.53 $ 48.53
Purchased Interest <F3>....... $ 53,917 $ 47,618 $ 22,949 $ 29,161 $ 29,776
Purchased Interest per Unit
<F3>.......................... $ 7.69 $ 9.52 $ 7.52 $ 9.60 $ 9.62
Public Offering Price per Unit
<F3>.......................... $ 1,025.16 $ 1,021.66 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit,
including Purchased Interest
<F3>............................ $ 987.11 $ 970.38 $ 943.82 $ 943.72 $ 943.74
Secondary Market Repurchase Price
per Unit, including Purchased
Interest <F3>................... $ 994.65 $ 978.14 $ 951.37 $ 951.47 $ 951.47
Excess of Public Offering Price
per Unit Over Redemption Price
per Unit........................ $ 38.05 $ 51.28 $ 56.18 $ 56.28 $ 56.26
Excess of Sponsor's Initial
Repurchase Price per Unit Over
Redemption Price per Unit....... $ 7.54 $ 7.76 $ 7.55 $ 7.75 $ 7.73
Minimum Value of the Trust under
which Trust Agreement may be
terminated...................... $ 1,403,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 612,000 $ 610,000 $ 629,000
Minimum Principal Distribution.......... $1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date................... August 31, 1994
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee...... Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee....... $0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds <F4>
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made
as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of
Units or receipt by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
<FN>
<F1>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a
number of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000
principal amount of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand,
in determining the number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT
Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts,
<PAGE>
4 Summary of Essential Financial Information
has elected not to follow this format but rather to provide that number of
Units which will establish as close as possible as of the Date of Deposit
a Public Offering Price per Unit of $1,000. For IM-IT Limited Maturity,
IM-IT Intermediate and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand,
each unit represents $1,000 principal amount of underlying securities in
such Trust on the Date of Deposit.
<F2>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price per Unit (excluding Purchased Interest) and in parenthesis
as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are as
follows: a State Trust - 4.9% (5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust - 4.3% (4.493%); an IM-IT Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); an
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust - 3.0% (3.093%).
<F3>Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid interest that has accrued on
the Bonds from the later of the last payment date on the Bonds or the date
of issuance thereof through the First Settlement Date and is included in
the calculation of the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest will be
distributed to Unitholders as Units are redeemed or Securities mature or
are called. Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First
Settlement Date will pay accrued interest from such date to the date of
settlement (normally five business days after order) less distributions
from the Interest Account subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For
purchases settling on the First Settlement Date, no accrued interest will
be added to the Public Offering Price other than the Purchased Interest
already included therein. After the initial offering period, the Sponsor's
Repurchase Price per Unit will be determined as described under the
caption "Public Offering-- Market for Units".
<F4>Such fee is based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities in
each Trust on the Date of Deposit for the first year and as of the close
of business on January 1 for each year thereafter.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Summary of Essential Financial Information 5
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
AND INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST,
MULTI-SERIES 230
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON THE DAY BEFORE THE
DATE OF DEPOSIT: AUGUST 23, 1994
SPONSOR: VAN KAMPEN MERRITT INC.
EVALUATOR: AMERICAN PORTFOLIO EVALUATION SERVICES
(A DIVISION OF A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SPONSOR)
TRUSTEE: THE BANK OF NEW YORK
<CAPTION>
NEW YORK HAWAII OREGON VIRGINIA
GENERAL INFORMATION IM-IT TRUST QUALITY TRUST QUALITY TRUST QUALITY TRUST
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in
Trust............................................. $ 3,010,000 $ 3,080,000 $ 3,120,000 $ 3,200,000
Number of Units..................................... 3,046 3,182 3,235 3,037
Fractional Undivided Interest in the Trust per
Unit.............................................. 1/3,046 1/3,182 1/3,235 1/3,037
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit
<F1>.............................................. $ 988.18 $ 967.94 $ 964.45 $ 1,053.67
Public Offering Price:
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities in
Portfolio....................................... $ 2,868,749 $ 2,997,418 $ 3,047,318 $ 2,860,423
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities per
Unit............................................ $ 941.81 $ 941.99 $ 941.98 $ 941.86
Sales Charge <F2>............................... $ 48.52 $ 48.54 $ 48.54 $ 48.52
Purchased Interest <F3>......................... $ 29,456 $ 30,149 $ 30,679 $ 29,209
Purchased Interest per Unit <F3>................ $ 9.67 $ 9.47 $ 9.48 $ 9.62
Public Offering Price per Unit <F3>............. $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit, including Purchased
Interest <F3>..................................... $ 944.11 $ 944.05 $ 944.06 $ 943.39
Secondary Market Repurchase Price per Unit,
including Purchased Interest <F3>................. $ 951.48 $ 951.46 $ 951.46 $ 951.48
Excess of Public Offering Price per Unit Over
Redemption Price per Unit......................... $ 55.89 $ 55.95 $ 55.94 $ 56.61
Excess of Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price per
Unit Over Redemption Price per Unit............... $ 7.37 $ 7.41 $ 7.40 $ 8.09
Minimum Value of the Trust under which Trust
Agreement may be terminated....................... $ 602,000 $ 616,000 $ 624,000 $ 640,000
Minimum Principal Distribution.......... $1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date................... August 31, 1994
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee...... Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee....... $0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds <F4>
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made
as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of
Units or receipt by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
<FN>
<F1>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a
number of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000
principal amount of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand,
in determining the number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT
Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts,
has elected not to follow this format but rather to provide that number of
Units which will establish as close as possible as of the Date of Deposit
a Public Offering Price per Unit of $1,000. For IM-IT Limited Maturity,
IM-IT Intermediate and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand,
each unit represents $1,000 principal amount of underlying securities in
such Trust on the Date of Deposit.
<F2>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price per Unit (excluding Purchased Interest) and in parenthesis
as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are as
follows: a State Trust - 4.9% (5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust - 4.3% (4.493%); an IM-IT Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); an
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust - 3.0% (3.093%).
<F3>Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid interest that has accrued on
the Bonds from the later of the last payment date on the Bonds or the date
of issuance thereof through the First Settlement Date and is included in
the calculation of
<PAGE>
6 Summary of Essential Financial Information
the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest will be distributed to
Unitholders as Units are redeemed or Securities mature or are called.
Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First Settlement Date will
pay accrued interest from such date to the date of settlement (normally
five business days after order) less distributions from the Interest
Account subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For purchases settling on
the First Settlement Date, no accrued interest will be added to the Public
Offering Price other than the Purchased Interest already included therein.
After the initial offering period, the Sponsor's Repurchase Price per Unit
will be determined as described under the caption "Public Offering--
Market for Units".
<F4>Such fee is based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities in
each Trust on the Date of Deposit for the first year and as of the close
of business on January 1 for each year thereafter.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 7
SETTLEMENT OF BONDS IN THE TRUSTS
THE FUND. Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 (the "Fund"), was created under the laws of
the State of New York pursuant to a Trust Indenture and Agreement (the "Trust
Agreement"), dated the Date of Deposit, among Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as
Sponsor, American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen
Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.
The Fund consists of nine separate portfolios of delivery statements
relating to contracts to purchase interest-bearing obligations issued by or on
behalf of states and territories of the United States, and political
subdivisions and authorities thereof, the interest on which is, in the opinion
of recognized bond counsel to the issuing authorities, excludable from gross
income for Federal income tax under existing law. All issuers of Securities in
a State Trust are located in the State for which such Trust is named or in
United States territories or possessions and their public authorities;
consequently, in the opinion of recognized bond counsel to such State issuers,
the related interest earned on such Securities is exempt to the extent
indicated from state and local taxes of such State. With the exception of the
New York and Pennsylvania Trusts, Units of such Trusts may be purchased only
by residents of the State for which such Trust is named. Units of a New York
Trust may be purchased by residents of New York, Connecticut, Florida and
Massachusetts. Units of a Pennsylvania Trust may be purchased by residents of
Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, New York, Ohio and West
Virginia. Offerees in the States of Indiana and Washington may purchase Units
of the IM-IT Short Intermediate and IM-IT Limited Maturity Trusts only.
Offerees in the State of Virginia may purchase Units of the IM-IT Short
Intermediate, IM-IT Limited Maturity, and Virginia Quality Trusts only. On the
Date of Deposit, the Sponsor deposited with the Trustee the aggregate
principal amount of Securities in each Trust as indicated under "General
Information--Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust" in the
"Summary of Essential Financial Information". Such Securities consist of
delivery statements relating to contracts for the purchase of certain
interest-bearing obligations and cash, cash equivalents and/or irrevocable
letters of credit issued by a financial institution in the amount required for
such purchases. Thereafter, the Trustee, in exchange for the Securities so
deposited, delivered to the Sponsor the certificates evidencing the ownership
of the number of Units in each Trust as indicated under "Summary of Essential
Financial Information." Unless otherwise terminated as provided herein, the
Trust Agreement for any State Trust will terminate at the end of the calendar
year prior to the fiftieth anniversary of its execution, and the Trust
Agreement for any IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, IM-IT Intermediate Trust or
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust will terminate at the end of the calendar year
prior to the twentieth anniversary of its execution.
The portfolio of any State Trust consists of Bonds maturing approximately
15 to 40 years from the Date of Deposit. The approximate range of maturities
from the Date of Deposit for Bonds in any IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, IM-IT
Intermediate Trust and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust is 12 to 15 years, 5 to
15 years and 3 to 7 years, respectively. The dollar-weighted average maturity
of the Bonds in any IM-IT Intermediate Trust and IM-IT Short Intermediate
Trust is less than or equal to 10 years and 5 years, respectively.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be "zero coupon" bonds.
See footnote (6) in "Notes to Portfolios". Zero coupon bonds are purchased at
a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to receive a final
payment at the maturity of the bond and does not receive any periodic interest
payments. The effect of owning deep discount bonds which do not make current
interest payments (such as the zero coupon bonds) is that a fixed yield is
earned not only on the original investment but also, in effect, on all
discount earned during the life of such obligation. This implicit reinvestment
of earnings at the same rate eliminates the risk of being unable to reinvest
the income on such obligation at a rate as high as the implicit yield on the
discount obligation, but at the same time eliminates the holder's ability to
reinvest at higher rates in the future. For this reason, zero coupon bonds are
subject to substantially greater price fluctuations during periods of changing
market interest rates than are securities of comparable quality which pay
interest.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may have been purchased on
a "when, as and if issued" or "delayed delivery" basis. See footnote (5) in
"Notes to Portfolios". The delivery of any such Securities may be
<PAGE>
8 Unitholder Explanations
delayed or may not occur. Interest on these Securities begins accruing to the
benefit of Unitholders on their respective dates of delivery. To the extent
any Securities are actually delivered to the Fund after their respective
expected dates of delivery, Unitholders who purchase their Units prior to the
date such Securities are actually delivered to the Trustee would be required
to adjust their tax basis in their Units for a portion of the interest
accruing on such Securities during the interval between their purchase of
Units and the actual delivery of such Securities. As a result of any such
adjustment, the Estimated Current Returns during the first year would be
slightly lower than those stated herein which would be the returns after the
first year, assuming the portfolio of a Trust and estimated annual expenses
other than that of the Trustee (which may be reduced in the first year only)
do not vary from that set forth under "Per Unit Information" for the
applicable Trust. Holders of the Units will be "at risk" with respect to all
Securities in the portfolios including "when, as and if issued" and "delayed
delivery" Securities (i.e., may derive either gain or loss from fluctuations
in the evaluation of such Securities) from the date they commit for Units. For
a discussion of the Sponsor's obligations in the event of the failure of any
contract for the purchase of any of the Securities and limited right to
substitute other tax-exempt bonds to replace any failed contract, see
"Replacement Bonds" below.
Each Unit initially offered represents the fractional undivided interest
in the principal and net income of a Trust indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information". To the extent that any Units are redeemed by
the Trustee, the fractional undivided interest in a Trust represented by each
unredeemed Unit will increase, although the actual interest in such Trust
represented by such fraction will remain unchanged. Units will remain
outstanding until redeemed upon tender to the Trustee by Unitholders, which
may include the Sponsor or the Underwriters, or until the termination of the
Trust Agreement.
OBJECTIVES AND SECURITIES SELECTION. The objectives of the Fund are
income exempt from Federal income taxation and, in the case of a State Trust,
Federal and state income taxation and conservation of capital through an
investment in diversified portfolios of Federal and state tax-exempt
obligations. There is, of course, no guarantee that the Trusts will achieve
their respective objectives. The Fund may be an appropriate investment vehicle
for investors who desire to participate in a portfolio of tax-exempt fixed
income securities with greater diversification than they might be able to
acquire individually. In addition, securities of the type deposited in the
Fund are often not available in small amounts.
Insurance guaranteeing the timely payment, when due, of all principal and
interest on the Bonds in each Insured Trust has been obtained by such Trust
from either AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity"), Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty" or "FGIC") or a combination
thereof (collectively, the "Portfolio Insurers"), or by the issuer of such
Bonds, by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit
of such Bonds in such Trust from (1) AMBAC Indemnity or one of its
subsidiaries, American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation ("AMBAC") or MGIC
Indemnity Corporation ("MGIC Indemnity"), (2) Financial Guaranty, (3)
Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation ("MBIA"), (4) Bond Investors
Guaranty Insurance Company ("BIG"), (5) National Union Fire Insurance Company
of Pittsburgh, PA. ("National Union"), (6) Capital Guaranty Insurance Company
("Capital Guaranty"), (7) Capital Markets Assurance Corporation ("CapMAC")
and/or (8) Financial Security Assurance Inc. ("Financial Security" or "FSA")
(collectively, the "Preinsured Bond Insurers") (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts"). Insurance
obtained by an Insured Trust is effective only while the Bonds thus insured
are held in such Trust. The Trustee has the right to acquire permanent
insurance from a Portfolio Insurer with respect to each Bond insured by the
respective Portfolio Insurer under a Trust portfolio insurance policy.
Insurance relating to Bonds insured by the issuer, by a prior owner of such
Bonds or by the Sponsor is effective so long as such Bonds are outstanding.
Bonds insured under a policy of insurance obtained by the issuer, by a prior
owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor from one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers
(the "Preinsured Bonds") are not additionally insured by an Insured Trust. No
representation is made as to any insurer's ability to meet its commitments.
Neither the Public Offering Price nor any evaluation of Units for
purposes of repurchases or redemptions reflects any element of value for the
insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, unless Bonds are in default in
payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such default. See
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 9
Price". On the other hand, the value, if any, of Preinsured Bond insurance is
reflected and included in the market value of such Bonds.
In order for bonds to be eligible for insurance, they must have credit
characteristics which would qualify them for at least the Standard & Poor's
Corporation rating of "BBB-" or at least the Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
rating of "Baa", which in brief represent the lowest ratings for securities of
investment grade (see "Other Matters--Description of Securities Ratings").
Insurance is not a substitute for the basic credit of an issuer, but
supplements the existing credit and provides additional security therefor. If
an issue is accepted for insurance, a non-cancellable policy for the prompt
payment of interest and principal on the bonds, when due, is issued by the
insurer. Any premium or premiums relating to Preinsured Bond insurance is paid
by the issuer, by a prior owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor and a monthly
premium is paid by an Insured Trust for the portfolio insurance, if any,
obtained by such Trust. The Trustee has the right to obtain permanent
insurance from a Portfolio Insurer in connection with the sale of a Bond
insured under the insurance policy obtained from the respective Portfolio
Insurer by an Insured Trust upon the payment of a single predetermined
insurance premium from the proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any
Bond in an Insured Trust is eligible to be sold on an insured basis. All Bonds
insured by the Portfolio Insurers and the Preinsured Bond Insurers receive a
"AAA" rating by Standard & Poor's Corporation. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
In selecting Securities for the Trusts the following facts, among others,
were considered by the Sponsor: (a) either the Standard & Poor's Corporation
rating of the Securities was in no case less than "BBB-" in the case of the
Insured Trusts and "A-" in the case of the Quality Trusts, or the Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. rating of the Securities was in no case less than
"Baa" in the case of the Insured Trusts and "A" in the case of the Quality
Trusts, including provisional or conditional ratings, respectively, or, if not
rated, the Securities had, in the opinion of the Sponsor, credit
characteristics sufficiently similar to the credit characteristics of
interest-bearing tax-exempt obligations that were so rated as to be acceptable
for acquisition by the Fund (see "Other Matters--Description of Securities
Ratings"), (b) the prices of the Securities relative to other bonds of
comparable quality and maturity, (c) the diversification of Securities as to
purpose of issue and location of issuer and (d) with respect to the Insured
Trusts, the availability and cost of insurance for the prompt payment of
principal and interest, when due, on the Securities. Subsequent to the Date of
Deposit, a Security may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below
the minimum required as of the Date of Deposit. Neither event requires
elimination of such Security from the portfolio of a Trust but may be
considered in the Sponsor's determination as to whether or not to direct the
Trustee to dispose of the Security (see "Trust Administration--Fund
Administration and Expenses--Portfolio Administration").
To the best knowledge of the Sponsor, there is no litigation pending as
of the Date of Deposit in respect of any Securities which might reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect upon the Fund or any of the Trusts.
At any time after the Date of Deposit, litigation may be initiated on a
variety of grounds with respect to Securities in the Fund. Such litigation,
as, for example, suits challenging the issuance of pollution control revenue
bonds under environmental protection statutes, may affect the validity of such
Securities or the tax-free nature of the interest thereon. While the outcome
of litigation of such nature can never be entirely predicted, the Fund has
received or will receive opinions of bond counsel to the issuing authorities
of each Security on the date of issuance to the effect that such Securities
have been validly issued and that the interest thereon is exempt from Federal
income tax. In addition, other factors may arise from time to time which
potentially may impair the ability of issuers to meet obligations undertaken
with respect to the Securities.
RISK FACTORS. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be
general obligations of a governmental entity that are backed by the taxing
power of such entity. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be
made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the
risks which such an investment may entail. All other Bonds in the Trusts are
revenue bonds payable from the income of a specific project or authority and
are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. General obligation
bonds are secured by the issuer's pledge of its faith, credit and taxing power
for the payment of principal and interest. Revenue bonds, on the other hand,
are payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class
of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise tax or
other specific revenue source. There are, of course, variations in the
security of the different
<PAGE>
10 Unitholder Explanations
Bonds in the Fund, both within a particular classification and between
classifications, depending on numerous factors. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which
derive their payments from mortgage loans. Certain of such housing bonds may
be FHA insured or may be single family mortgage revenue bonds issued for the
purpose of acquiring from originating financial institutions notes secured by
mortgages on residences located within the issuer's boundaries and owned by
persons of low or moderate income. In view of this an investment in such a
Trust should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such
issuers and the risks which such an investment may entail. Mortgage loans are
generally partially or completely prepaid prior to their final maturities as a
result of events such as sale of the mortgaged premises, default, condemnation
or casualty loss. Because these bonds are subject to extraordinary mandatory
redemption in whole or in part from such prepayments of mortgage loans, a
substantial portion of such bonds will probably be redeemed prior to their
scheduled maturities or even prior to their ordinary call dates. Extraordinary
mandatory redemption without premium could also result from the failure of the
originating financial institutions to make mortgage loans in sufficient
amounts within a specified time period. Additionally, unusually high rates of
default on the underlying mortgage loans may reduce revenues available for the
payment of principal of or interest on such mortgage revenue bonds. These
bonds were issued under Section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code, which
Section contains certain requirements relating to the use of the proceeds of
such bonds in order for the interest on such bonds to retain its tax-exempt
status. In each case the issuer of the bonds has covenanted to comply with
applicable requirements and bond counsel to such issuer has issued an opinion
that the interest on the bonds is exempt from Federal income tax under
existing laws and regulations. Certain issuers of housing bonds have
considered various ways to redeem bonds they have issued prior to the stated
first redemption dates for such bonds. In connection with the housing bonds
held by the Fund, the Sponsor at the Date of Deposit is not aware that any of
the respective issuers of such Bonds are actively considering the redemption
of such Bonds prior to their respective stated initial call dates. See
"General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be health care revenue
bonds. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Ratings of bonds issued for health care facilities
are often based on feasibility studies that contain projections of occupancy
levels, revenues and expenses. A facility's gross receipts and net income
available for debt service may be affected by future events and conditions
including, among other things, demand for services and the ability of the
facility to provide the services required, physicians' confidence in the
facility, management capabilities, competition with other health care
facilities, efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates,
legislation establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, the cost and
possible unavailability of malpractice insurance, the funding of Medicare,
Medicaid and other similar third party payor programs, government regulation
and the termination or restriction of governmental financial assistance,
including that associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third
party payor programs. Pursuant to recent Federal legislation, Medicare
reimbursements are currently calculated on a prospective basis utilizing a
single nationwide schedule of rates. Prior to such legislation Medicare
reimbursements were based on the actual costs incurred by the health facility.
The current legislation may adversely affect reimbursements to hospitals and
other facilities for services provided under the Medicare program. Such
adverse changes also may adversely affect the ratings of Securities held in
the portfolios of the Fund; however, because of the insurance obtained by each
of the Insured Trusts, the "AAA" rating of the Units of each of the Insured
Trusts would not be affected. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of
public utility issuers, including those selling wholesale and retail electric
power and gas. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. General problems of such issuers would
include the difficulty in financing large construction programs in an
inflationary period, the limitations on operations and increased costs and
delays attributable to environmental considerations, the difficulty of the
capital market in absorbing utility debt, the difficulty in obtaining fuel at
reasonable prices and the effect of energy conservation. All of such issuers
have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees. In
addition, Federal, state and municipal governmental authorities may from time
to time review existing, and impose
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 11
additional, regulations governing the licensing, construction and operation of
nuclear power plants, which may adversely affect the ability of the issuers of
certain of the Bonds in the portfolio to make payments of principal and/or
interest on such Bonds. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of
issuers whose revenues are derived from the sale of water and/or sewerage
services. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Such Bonds are generally payable from user fees. The
problems of such issuers include the ability to obtain timely and adequate
rate increases, population decline resulting in decreased user fees, the
difficulty of financing large construction programs, the limitations on
operations and increased costs and delays attributable to environmental
considerations, the increasing difficulty of obtaining or discovering new
supplies of fresh water, the effect of conservation programs and the impact of
"no-growth" zoning ordinances. All of such issuers have been experiencing
certain of these problems in varying degrees. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be industrial revenue
bonds ("IRBs"). In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. IRBs have generally been issued under
bond resolutions pursuant to which the revenues and receipts payable under the
arrangements with the operator of a particular project have been assigned and
pledged to purchasers. In some cases, a mortgage on the underlying project may
have been granted as security for the IRBs. Regardless of the structure,
payment of IRBs is solely dependent upon the creditworthiness of the corporate
operator of the project or corporate guarantor. Corporate operators or
guarantors may be affected by many factors which may have an adverse impact on
the credit quality of the particular company or industry. These include
cyclicality of revenues and earnings, regulatory and environmental
restrictions, litigation resulting from accidents or environmentally-caused
illnesses, extensive competition and financial deterioration resulting from a
corporate restructuring pursuant to a leveraged buy-out, takeover or
otherwise. Such a restructuring may result in the operator of a project
becoming highly leveraged which may impact on such operator's creditworthiness
which in turn would have an adverse impact on the rating and/or market value
of such Bonds. Further, the possibility of such a restructuring may have an
adverse impact on the market for and consequently the value of such Bonds,
even though no actual takeover or other action is ever contemplated or
effected. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations that are
secured by lease payments of a governmental entity (hereinafter called "lease
obligations"). Lease obligations are often in the form of certificates of
participation. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. Although the lease obligations do not
constitute general obligations of the municipality for which the
municipality's taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is ordinarily
backed by the municipality's covenant to appropriate for and make the payments
due under the lease obligation. However, certain lease obligations contain
"non-appropriation" clauses which provide that the municipality has no
obligation to make lease payments in future years unless money is appropriated
for such purpose on a yearly basis. A governmental entity that enters into
such a lease agreement cannot obligate future governments to appropriate for
and make lease payments but covenants to take such action as is necessary to
include any lease payments due in its budgets and to make the appropriations
therefor. A governmental entity's failure to appropriate for and to make
payments under its lease obligation could result in insufficient funds
available for payment of the obligations secured thereby. Although
"non-appropriation" lease obligations are secured by the leased property,
disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure might prove difficult.
See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of
issuers which are, or which govern the operation of, schools, colleges and
universities and whose revenues are derived mainly from ad valorem taxes or
for higher education systems, from tuition, dormitory revenues, grants and
endowments. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with
an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which
such an investment may entail. General problems relating to school bonds
include litigation contesting the State constitutionality of financing public
education in part from ad valorem taxes, thereby creating a disparity in
educational funds available to schools in wealthy areas and schools in poor
areas. Litigation or legislation on this issue may affect the
<PAGE>
12 Unitholder Explanations
sources of funds available for the payment of school bonds in the Trusts.
General problems relating to college and university obligations include the
prospect of a declining percentage of the population consisting of "college"
age individuals, possible inability to raise tuitions and fees sufficiently to
cover increased operating costs, the uncertainty of continued receipt of
Federal grants and state funding, and government legislation or regulations
which may adversely affect the revenues or costs of such issuers. All of such
issuers have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees.
See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which
are payable from and secured by revenues derived from the ownership and
operation of facilities such as airports, bridges, turnpikes, port
authorities, convention centers and arenas. In view of this an investment in
such a Trust should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of
such issuers and the risks which such an investment may entail. The major
portion of an airport's gross operating income is generally derived from fees
received from signatory airlines pursuant to use agreements which consist of
annual payments for leases, occupancy of certain terminal space and service
fees. Airport operating income may therefore be affected by the ability of the
airlines to meet their obligations under the use agreements. The air transport
industry is experiencing significant variations in earnings and traffic, due
to increased competition, excess capacity, increased costs, deregulation,
traffic constraints and other factors, and several airlines are experiencing
severe financial difficulties. The Sponsor cannot predict what effect these
industry conditions may have on airport revenues which are dependent for
payment on the financial condition of the airlines and their usage of the
particular airport facility. Similarly, payment on Bonds related to other
facilities is dependent on revenues from the projects, such as user fees from
ports, tolls on turnpikes and bridges and rents from buildings. Therefore,
payment may be adversely affected by reduction in revenues due to such factors
as increased cost of maintenance, decreased use of a facility, lower cost of
alternative modes of transportation, scarcity of fuel and reduction or loss of
rents. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which
are payable from and secured by revenues derived from the operation of
resource recovery facilities. In view of this an investment in such a Trust
should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers
and the risks which such an investment may entail. Resource recovery
facilities are designed to process solid waste, generate steam and convert
steam to electricity. Resource recovery bonds may be subject to extraordinary
optional redemption at par upon the occurrence of certain circumstances,
including but not limited to: destruction or condemnation of a project;
contracts relating to a project becoming void, unenforceable or impossible to
perform; changes in the economic availability of raw materials, operating
supplies or facilities necessary for the operation of a project or
technological or other unavoidable changes adversely affecting the operation
of a project; administrative or judicial actions which render contracts
relating to the projects void, unenforceable or impossible to perform; or
impose unreasonable burdens or excessive liabilities. The Sponsor cannot
predict the causes or likelihood of the redemption of resource recovery bonds
in such a Trust prior to the stated maturity of the Bonds. See "General" for
each Trust.
REPLACEMENT BONDS. Because certain of the Securities in the Fund may from
time to time under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will mature in
accordance with their terms and because the proceeds from such events will be
distributed to Unitholders and will not be reinvested, no assurance can be
given that any Trust will retain for any length of time its present size and
composition. Neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee shall be liable in any way
for any default, failure or defect in any Security. In the event of a failure
to deliver any Security that has been purchased for the Fund under a contract,
including those Securities purchased on a "when, as and if issued" basis
("Failed Bonds"), the Sponsor is authorized under the Trust Agreement to
direct the Trustee to acquire other bonds ("Replacement Bonds") to make up the
original corpus of the Fund.
The Replacement Bonds must be purchased within 20 days after delivery of
the notice of the failed contract and the purchase price (exclusive of accrued
interest) may not exceed the amount of funds reserved for the purchase of the
Failed Bonds. The Replacement Bonds (i) must be tax-exempt bonds issued by
states or territories of the United States or political subdivisions thereof
and, in the case of replacement of bonds in a State Trust, shall have the
benefit of an exemption from state taxation of interest to an extent equal to
or greater than that of the bonds they replace, (ii) must have a fixed
maturity date of at least 10 years in the case of a State Trust or, in the
case of an IM-IT Limited
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 13
Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate or IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust, must have a
fixed maturity date within the range set forth under "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--The Fund", (iii) must be
purchased at a price that results in a yield to maturity and in a current
return, in each case as of the Date of Deposit, at least equal to that of the
Failed Bonds, (iv) shall not be "when, as and if issued" bonds, (v) must be
rated "BBB-" or better in the case of the Insured Trusts and "A-" or better in
the case of the Quality Trusts by Standard & Poor's Corporation or "Baa" or
better in the case of the Insured Trusts and "A" or better in the case of the
Quality Trusts by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and (vi) with respect to
each Insured Trust, must be insured by one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers or
be eligible for (and when acquired be insured under) the insurance obtained by
such Insured Trust. Whenever a Replacement Bond has been acquired for the
Fund, the Trustee shall, within five days thereafter, notify all Unitholders
of the affected Trust of the acquisition of the Replacement Bond and shall, on
the next monthly distribution date which is more than 30 days thereafter, make
a pro rata distribution of the amount, if any, by which the cost to the
affected Trust of the Failed Bond exceeded the cost of the Replacement Bond
plus accrued interest. Once the original corpus of a Trust is acquired, the
Trustee will have no power to vary the investment of the Trust; i.e., the
Trust will have no managerial power to take advantage of market variation to
improve a Unitholder's investment.
If the right of limited substitution described in the preceding paragraph
shall not be utilized to acquire Replacement Bonds in the event of a failed
contract, the Sponsor will refund the sales charge attributable to such Failed
Bonds to all Unitholders of the affected Trust and distribute the principal,
Purchased Interest and accrued interest (at the coupon rate of such Failed
Bonds to the date the Failed Bonds are removed from the Fund) attributable to
such Failed Bonds not more than 30 days after such removal or such earlier
time as the Trustee in its sole discretion deems to be in the interest of the
Unitholders. All such interest paid to a Unitholder which accrued after the
expected date of settlement for purchase of his Units will be paid by the
Sponsor and accordingly will not be treated as tax-exempt income. In the event
a Replacement Bond should not be acquired by the Fund, the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit for the affected Trust would be reduced and
the Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return thereon might be
lowered. In addition, Unitholders should be aware that they may not be able at
the time of receipt of such principal to reinvest such proceeds in other
securities at a yield equal to or in excess of the yield which such proceeds
were earning to Unitholders in the affected Trust.
BOND REDEMPTIONS. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be
subject to redemption prior to their stated maturity date pursuant to sinking
fund provisions, call provisions or extraordinary optional or mandatory
redemption provisions or otherwise. A sinking fund is a reserve fund
accumulated over a period of time for retirement of debt. A callable debt
obligation is one which is subject to redemption or refunding prior to
maturity at the option of the issuer. A refunding is a method by which a debt
obligation is redeemed, at or before maturity, by the proceeds of a new debt
obligation. In general, call provisions are more likely to be exercised when
the offering side valuation is at a premium over par than when it is at a
discount from par. The exercise of redemption or call provisions will (except
to the extent the proceeds of the called Bonds are used to pay for Unit
redemptions) result in the distribution of principal and may result in a
reduction in the amount of subsequent interest distributions; it may also
affect the current return on Units of the Trust involved. Each Trust portfolio
contains a listing of the sinking fund and call provisions, if any, with
respect to each of the debt obligations. Extraordinary optional redemptions
and mandatory redemptions result from the happening of certain events.
Generally, events that may permit the extraordinary optional redemption of
Bonds or may require the mandatory redemption of Bonds include, among others:
a final determination that the interest on the Bonds is taxable; the
substantial damage or destruction by fire or other casualty of the project for
which the proceeds of the Bonds were used; an exercise by a local, state or
Federal governmental unit of its power of eminent domain to take all or
substantially all of the project for which the proceeds of the Bonds were
used; changes in the economic availability of raw materials, operating
supplies or facilities or technological or other changes which render the
operation of the project for which the proceeds of the Bonds were used
uneconomic; changes in law or an administrative or judicial decree which
renders the performance of the agreement under which the proceeds of the Bonds
were made available to finance the project impossible or which creates
unreasonable burdens or which imposes excessive liabilities, such as taxes,
not imposed on the date the Bonds are issued on the issuer of the Bonds or the
user of the proceeds of the Bonds; an administrative or judicial decree which
requires the cessation of a
<PAGE>
14 Unitholder Explanations
substantial part of the operations of the project financed with the proceeds
of the Bonds; an overestimate of the costs of the project to be financed with
the proceeds of the Bonds resulting in excess proceeds of the Bonds which may
be applied to redeem Bonds; or an underestimate of a source of funds securing
the Bonds resulting in excess funds which may be applied to redeem Bonds. The
issuer of certain Bonds in a Trust may have sold or reserved the right to
sell, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, to third parties all or any
portion of its rights to call Bonds in accordance with the stated redemption
provisions of such Bonds. In such a case the issuer no longer has the right to
call the Bonds for redemption unless it reacquires the rights from such third
party. A third party pursuant to these rights may exercise the redemption
provisions with respect to a Bond at a time when the issuer of the Bond might
not have called a Bond for redemption had it not sold such rights. The Sponsor
is unable to predict all of the circumstances which may result in such
redemption of an issue of Bonds. See "Portfolio" for each Trust and footnote
(3) in the "Notes to Portfolios". See also the discussion of single family
mortgage and multi-family revenue bonds above for more information on the call
provisions of such bonds.
DISTRIBUTIONS. Distributions of interest received by the Fund, pro rated
on an annual basis, will be made monthly. The first such distribution will be
in the amount indicated under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust
and will be made on the fifteenth day of the month indicated under "Initial
Distribution" therein to Unitholders of record on the first day of such month.
Distribution of funds from the Principal Account, if any, will also be made
monthly, except under certain special circumstances (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Distributions of Interest and Principal").
CERTIFICATES. The Trustee is authorized to treat as the record owner of
Units that person who is registered as such owner on the books of the Trustee.
Ownership of Units of each Trust is evidenced by separate registered
certificates executed by the Trustee and the Sponsor. Certificates are
transferable by presentation and surrender to the Trustee properly endorsed or
accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer. A Unitholder
must sign exactly as his name appears on the face of the certificate with the
signature guaranteed by a participant in the Securities Transfer Agents
Medallion Program ("STAMP") or such other signature guaranty program in
addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, as may be accepted by the Trustee.
In certain instances the Trustee may require additional documents such as, but
not limited to, trust instruments, certificates of death, appointments as
executor or administrator or certificates of corporate authority. Certificates
will be issued in denominations of one Unit or any multiple thereof.
Although no such charge is now made or contemplated, the Trustee may
require a Unitholder to pay a reasonable fee for each certificate re-issued
(other than as a result of a change in plan of distribution) or transferred
and to pay any governmental charge that may be imposed in connection with each
such transfer or interchange. Destroyed, stolen, mutilated or lost
certificates will be replaced upon delivery to the Trustee of satisfactory
indemnity, evidence of ownership and payment of expenses incurred. Mutilated
certificates must be surrendered to the Trustee for replacement.
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURNS AND ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURNS
As of the close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit the
Estimated Current Return and the Estimated Long-Term Return were as set forth
in the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust. Estimated Current Return is
calculated by dividing the estimated net annual interest income per Unit by
the Public Offering Price. The estimated net annual interest income per Unit
will vary with changes in fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator
and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of
Securities while the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the
offering price of the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased
Interest; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return will be realized in the future. Estimated Long-Term Return is
calculated using a formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines
and factors in the relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which
takes into account the amortization of premiums and the accretion of
discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the Securities in a Trust and
(2) takes into account the expenses and sales charge associated with each
Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated retirements of the
Securities and the expenses of a Trust will change, there is no assurance that
the present Estimated Long-Term Return will be
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 15
realized in the future. The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term
Return are expected to differ because the calculation of Estimated Long-Term
Return reflects the estimated date and amount of principal returned while the
Estimated Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income
and Public Offering Price.
In order to acquire certain of the Securities contracted for by the
Sponsor for deposit in the Fund, it may be necessary for the Sponsor or
Trustee to pay on the settlement dates for delivery of such Securities amounts
covering accrued interest on such Securities which exceed (1) the amounts paid
by Unitholders and (2) the amounts which will be made available through cash
furnished by the Sponsor on the Date of Deposit, which amount of cash may
exceed the interest which would accrue to the First Settlement Date. The
Trustee has agreed to pay for any amounts necessary to cover any such excess
and will be reimbursed therefor, without interest, when funds become available
from interest payments on the particular Securities with respect to which such
payments may have been made. Also, since interest on any "when, as and if
issued" Securities does not begin accruing as tax-exempt interest income to
the benefit of Unitholders until their respective dates of delivery, the
Trustee may, in order to maintain (or in some cases approach) for the
Unitholders the same estimated net annual interest incomes during the first
year of the Trusts' operations as is indicated under "Per Unit Information"
for the applicable Trust, reduce its fee (and to the extent necessary pay
Trust expenses) in an amount equal to that indicated under "Per Unit
Information" for the applicable Trust.
INTEREST EARNING SCHEDULE
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL INTEREST INCOME. The estimated net
annual interest income is based on 360 days. To account for the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit in a Trust, it is necessary to use the
following information.
The beginning interest date for each Trust is August 31, 1994. The first
record date for each Trust (October 1, 1994) is 31 days from such date. The
daily rates of estimated net annual interest income per Unit are $.12418,
$.15336, $.15718, $.15449, $.15453, $.15508, $.15229, $.15249 and $.15452 for
the IM-IT Short Intermediate, IM-IT Limited Maturity, California IM-IT,
Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT, Hawaii Quality, Oregon Quality
and Virginia Quality Trusts, respectively. This amounts to $3.85, $4.75,
$4.87, $4.79, $4.79, $4.81, $4.72, $4.73 and $4.79 for the IM-IT Short
Intermediate, IM-IT Limited Maturity, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT,
Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT, Hawaii Quality, Oregon Quality and Virginia
Quality Trusts, respectively.
Utilizing the preceding information, the following procedure illustrates
the calculation of first year estimated net annual interest income per Unit
for the California IM-IT Trust:
The California IM-IT Trust accrues
$4.87 to the first record date plus
$47.20 which is 10 normal distributions at $4.72, and finally adding
$4.51 which has accrued from August 1, 1995 until August 31, 1995
which completes the 360 day cycle (30 days times the daily
factor)
Total $56.58 interest earned / $1,000.00 (Date of Deposit Public Offering
Price) = 5.66% Estimated Current Return as of the Date of
Deposit.
PURCHASED AND ACCRUED INTEREST
PURCHASED INTEREST. Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid
interest that has accrued on the Securities from the later of the last payment
date on the Securities or the date of issuance thereof through the First
Settlement Date and is included in the calculation of the Public Offering
Price. Purchased Interest will be distributed to Unitholders as Units are
redeemed or Securities mature or are called. See "Summary of Essential
Financial Information" for the amount of Purchased Interest per Unit for each
Trust. Purchased Interest is an element of the price Unitholders will receive
in connection with the sale or redemption of Units prior to the termination of
the Trust.
ACCRUED INTEREST. Accrued interest is an accumulation of unpaid interest
on securities which generally is paid semi-annually, although the Trust
accrues such interest daily. Because of this, the Trust always has an amount
of
<PAGE>
16 Unitholder Explanations
interest earned but not yet collected by the Trustee. For this reason, with
respect to sales settling subsequent to the First Settlement Date, the Public
Offering Price of Units will have added to it the proportionate share of
accrued interest to the date of settlement. Unitholders will receive on the
next distribution date of the Trust the amount, if any, of accrued interest
paid on their Units.
As indicated in "Purchased Interest", accrued interest as of the First
Settlement Date includes Purchased Interest. In an effort to reduce the amount
of Purchased Interest which would otherwise have to be paid by Unitholders,
the Trustee may advance a portion of such accrued interest to the Sponsor as
the Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date. Consequently, the
amount of accrued interest to be added to the Public Offering Price of Units
will include only accrued interest from the First Settlement Date to the date
of settlement (other than the Purchased Interest already included therein),
less any distributions from the Interest Account subsequent to the First
Settlement Date. See "Public Offering--Distributions of Interest and
Principal".
Because of the varying interest payment dates of the Securities, accrued
interest at any point in time will be greater than the amount of interest
actually received by a Trust and distributed to Unitholders. If a Unitholder
sells or redeems all or a portion of his Units, he will be entitled to receive
his proportionate share of the Purchased Interest and accrued interest from
the purchaser of his Units. Since the Trustee has the use of the funds
(including Purchased Interest) held in the Interest Account for distributions
to Unitholders and since such Account is non-interest-bearing to Unitholders,
the Trustee benefits thereby.
PUBLIC OFFERING
GENERAL. Units are offered at the Public Offering Price which includes
Purchased Interest. During the initial offering period the Public Offering
Price is based on the offering prices of the Securities in each Trust and
includes a sales charge of 4.9% of the Public Offering Price (excluding
Purchased Interest) (5.152% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities)
for a State Trust, 4.3% of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased
Interest) (4.493% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities) for an
IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, 3.9% of the Public Offering Price (excluding
Purchased Interest) (4.058% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities)
for an IM-IT Intermediate Trust and 3.0% of the Public Offering Price
(excluding Purchased Interest) (3.093% of the aggregate offering price of the
Securities) for an IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust. After the initial public
offering period, the secondary market Public Offering Price is based on the
bid prices of the Securities in each Trust and includes a sales charge
determined in accordance with the table set forth below, which is based upon
the dollar weighted average maturity of each Trust plus in each case Purchased
Interest and accrued interest, if any. For purposes of computation, Bonds will
be deemed to mature on their expressed maturity dates unless: (a) the Bonds
have been called for redemption or funds or securities have been placed in
escrow to redeem them on an earlier call date, in which case such call date
will be deemed to be the date upon which they mature; or (b) such Bonds are
subject to a "mandatory tender", in which case such mandatory tender will be
deemed to be the date upon which they mature.
The effect of this method of sales charge computation will be that
different sales charge rates will be applied to each Trust based upon the
dollar weighted average maturity of such Trust's Portfolio, in accordance with
the following schedule:
YEARS TO MATURITY SALES CHARGE YEARS TO MATURITY SALES CHARGE
1................... 1.523% 9.................... 4.712%
2................... 2.041 10................... 4.932
3................... 2.564 11................... 4.932
4................... 3.199 12................... 4.932
5................... 3.842 13................... 5.374
6................... 4.058 14................... 5.374
7................... 4.275 15................... 5.374
8................... 4.493 16 to 30............. 6.045
The sales charges in the above table are expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate bid prices of the Securities in a Trust. Expressed as a percent of
the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest), the sales
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 17
charge on a Trust consisting entirely of a portfolio of Bonds with 15 years to
maturity would be 5.10%. The sales charge applicable to quantity purchases
during the initial offering period is, however, reduced on a graduated basis
to any person acquiring 100 or more Units as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DOLLAR AMOUNT OF SALES
CHARGE REDUCTION PER UNIT
AGGREGATE NUMBER OF STATE AND NATIONAL
UNITS PURCHASED QUALITY TRUSTS OTHER TRUSTS
<S> <C> <C>
100-249 Units................................... $ 4.00 $ 4.00
250-499 Units................................... $ 6.00 $ 6.00
500-999 Units................................... $ 14.00 $ 9.00
1,000 or more Units............................. $ 19.00 $ 11.00
</TABLE>
Any such reduced sales charge shall be the responsibility of the selling
Underwriter, broker, dealer or agent. The Sponsor will, however, increase the
concession or agency commission for such quantity purchases. See "Public
Offering--Unit Distribution". This reduced sales charge structure will apply
on all purchases by the same person from any one Underwriter or dealer of
units of Van Kampen Merritt-sponsored unit investment trusts which are being
offered in the initial offering period (a) on any one day (the "Initial
Purchase Date") or (b) on any day subsequent to the Initial Purchase Date, if
(1) the units purchased are of a unit investment trust purchased on the
Initial Purchase Date, and (2) the person purchasing the units purchased a
sufficient amount of units on the Initial Purchase Date to qualify for a
reduced sales charge on such date. In the event units of more than one trust
are purchased on the Initial Purchase Date, the aggregate dollar amount of
such purchases will be used to determine whether purchasers are eligible for a
reduced sales charge. Such aggregate dollar amount will be divided by the
public offering price per unit (on the day preceding the date of purchase) of
each respective trust purchased to determine the total number of units which
such amount could have purchased of each individual trust. Purchasers must
then consult the applicable trust's prospectus to determine whether the total
number of units which could have been purchased of a specific trust would have
qualified for a reduced sales charge and, if so qualified, the amount of such
reduction. Assuming a purchaser qualifies for a sales charge reduction or
reductions, to determine the applicable sales charge reduction or reductions
it is necessary to accumulate all purchases made on the Initial Purchase Date
and all purchases made in accordance with (b) above. In addition to the
foregoing, anyone who purchases, or commits to purchase at the first
available date, from any one Underwriter or dealer units of IM-IT 94th Short
Intemediate, IM-IT 80th Intermediate and IM-IT 76th Limited Maturity which
when aggregated equal 1,000 or more units will be entitled to that
reduced sales charge for 1,000 or more units in connection with the purchase
of all such units. Units purchased in the name of the spouse of a purchaser
or in the name of a child of such purchaser under 21 years of age will be
deemed for the purposes of calculating the applicable sales charge to be
additional purchases by the purchaser. The reduced sales charges will also
be applicable to a trustee or other fiduciary purchasing securities for one
or more trust estate or fiduciary accounts. Employees of Van Kampen Merritt
Inc. and its subsidiaries may purchase Units of the Trust at the current
Public Offering Price less the underwriting commission during the initial
offering period, and less the dealer's concession for secondary market
transactions. Registered representatives of selling Underwriters may
purchase Units of the Fund at the current Public Offering Price less the
underwriting commission during the initial offering period, and less the
dealer's concession for secondary market transactions. Registered
representatives of selling brokers, dealers, or agents may purchase
Units of the Fund at the current Public Offering Price less the dealer's
concession during the initial offering period and for secondary market
transactions.
OFFERING PRICE. Public Offering Price of the Units will vary from the
amounts stated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information" in
accordance with fluctuations in the prices of the underlying Securities in
each Trust.
As indicated above, the price of the Units as of the date the Securities
were deposited in each Trust was determined by adding to the aggregate
offering price of the Securities of a Trust an amount equal to the applicable
sales charge expressed as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the
Securities plus Purchased Interest and dividing the sum so obtained by the
number of Units outstanding. This computation produced a gross underwriting
commission equal to such sales charge expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest). Such price determination as of
the close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit was made on the
basis of an evaluation of the Securities in each Trust prepared by Interactive
Data Services, Inc., a firm regularly engaged in the business of evaluating,
quoting or appraising comparable securities. After the close of business on
the
<PAGE>
18 Unitholder Explanations
day before the Date of Deposit and during the period of initial offering, the
Evaluator will appraise or cause to be appraised daily the value of the
underlying Securities of each Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days the
New York Stock Exchange is open for business and will adjust the Public
Offering Price of the Units commensurate with such appraisal. Such Public
Offering Price will be effective for all orders received at or prior to 4:00
P.M. Eastern time on each such day. Orders received by the Trustee, Sponsor or
any Underwriter for purchases, sales or redemptions after that time, or on a
day when the New York Stock Exchange is closed, will be held until the next
determination of price. For secondary market sales the Public Offering Price
per Unit will be equal to the aggregate bid price of the Securities in the
Trust plus an amount equal to the applicable secondary market sales charge
expressed as a percentage of the aggregate bid price of the Securities plus
Purchased Interest and dividing the sum so attained by the number of Units
then outstanding. This computation produces a gross commission equal to such
sales charge expressed as a percentage of the Public Offering Price (excluding
Purchased Interest). For secondary market purposes such appraisal and
adjustment with respect to a Trust will be made by the Evaluator as of 4:00
P.M. Eastern time on days in which the New York Stock Exchange is open for
each day on which any Unit of such Trust is tendered for redemption, and it
shall determine the aggregate value of any Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time
on such other days as may be necessary.
The aggregate price of the Securities in each Trust has been and will be
determined on the basis of bid prices or offering prices, as is appropriate,
(a) on the basis of current market prices for the Securities obtained from
dealers or brokers who customarily deal in bonds comparable to those held by
the Fund; (b) if such prices are not available for any particular Securities,
on the basis of current market prices for comparable bonds; (c) by causing the
value of the Securities to be determined by others engaged in the practice of
evaluation, quoting or appraising comparable bonds; or (d) by any combination
of the above. Market prices of the Securities will generally fluctuate with
changes in market interest rates. Unless Bonds are in default in payment of
principal or interest or in significant risk of such default, the Evaluator
will not attribute any value to the insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any.
The Evaluator will consider in its evaluation of Bonds which are in
default in payment of principal or interest or, in the Sponsor's opinion, in
significant risk of such default (the "Defaulted Bonds") the value of the
insurance guaranteeing interest and principal payments. The value of the
insurance will be equal to the difference between (i) the market value of
Defaulted Bonds assuming the exercise of the right to obtain Permanent
Insurance (less the insurance premiums and related expenses attributable to
the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value of such
Defaulted Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. In addition, the Evaluator
will consider the ability of the affected Portfolio Insurer to meet its
commitments under any Trust insurance policy, including the commitments to
issue Permanent Insurance. It is the position of the Sponsor that this is a
fair method of valuing the Bonds and the insurance obtained by an Insured
Trust and reflects a proper valuation method in accordance with the provisions
of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
No value has been ascribed to insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any, as of the date of this Prospectus.
The initial or primary Public Offering Price of the Units is equal to the
offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust plus the
applicable sales charge plus Purchased Interest and interest accrued but
unpaid from the First Settlement Date to the date of settlement. The secondary
market Public Offering Price is equal to the bid price per Unit of the
Securities in each Trust plus the applicable sales charge plus Purchased
Interest and accrued interest. The offering price of Securities in each Trust
may be expected to average approximately 0.5%-1% more than the bid price of
such Securities. On the Date of Deposit, the offering side evaluations of the
Securities in the Trusts were higher than the bid side evaluations of such
Securities by the respective amounts indicated under footnote (5) in "Notes to
Portfolios".
Although payment is normally made five business days following the order
for purchase, payment may be made prior thereto. A person will become the
owner of Units on the date of settlement provided payment has been received.
Cash, if any, made available to the Sponsor prior to the date of settlement
for the purchase of Units may be used in the Sponsor's business and may be
deemed to be a benefit to the Sponsor, subject to the limitations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Delivery of certificates representing Units
so ordered will be made five business days following
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 19
such order or shortly thereafter. See "Redemption of Units" below for
information regarding the ability to redeem Units ordered for purchase.
MARKET FOR UNITS. During the initial public offering period, the Sponsor
and/or certain of the Underwriters intend to offer to purchase Units at a
price equivalent to the Public Offering Price which is based upon the
aggregate offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust
and the amount of Purchased Interest for each Trust plus accrued interest to
the date of settlement less the related sales commission. Afterward, although
they are not obligated to do so, the Sponsor intends to, and certain of the
other Underwriters may, maintain a market for the Units offered hereby and to
offer continuously to purchase such Units at prices, subject to change at any
time, based upon the aggregate bid prices of the Securities in the portfolio
of each Trust plus Purchased Interest plus interest accrued to the date of
settlement and plus any principal cash on hand, less any amounts representing
taxes or other governmental charges payable out of the Trust and less any
accrued Trust expenses. If the supply of Units exceeds demand or if some other
business reason warrants it, the Sponsor and/or the Underwriters may either
discontinue all purchases of Units or discontinue purchases of Units at such
prices. In the event that a market is not maintained for the Units and the
Unitholder cannot find another purchaser, a Unitholder of any Trust desiring
to dispose of his Units may be able to dispose of such Units only by tendering
them to the Trustee for redemption at the Redemption Price, which is based
upon the aggregate bid price of the Securities in the portfolio of such Trust
plus Purchased Interest and any accrued interest. The aggregate bid prices of
the underlying Securities in a Trust are expected to be less than the related
aggregate offering prices. See "Redemption of Units" below. A Unitholder who
wishes to dispose of his Units should inquire of his broker as to current
market prices in order to determine whether there is in existence any price in
excess of the Redemption Price and, if so, the amount thereof.
DISTRIBUTIONS OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL. Interest received by the Fund,
including that part of the proceeds of any disposition of Securities which
represents Purchased Interest and/or accrued interest, is credited by the
Trustee to the Interest Account for the appropriate Trust. Other receipts are
credited to the Principal Account for the appropriate Trust. Interest received
by the Fund after deduction of amounts sufficient to reimburse the Trustee,
without interest, for any amounts advanced and paid to the Sponsor as the
Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date (see "Public
Offering--Offering Price" above) will be distributed on or shortly after the
fifteenth day of each month on a pro rata basis to Unitholders of record of a
Trust as of the preceding record date who are entitled to distributions at
that time. All distributions will be net of applicable expenses. The pro rata
share of cash in the Principal Account of a Trust will be computed as of the
date set forth under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust, and
thereafter as of the record date, and distributions to the Unitholders as of
such record date will be made on or shortly after the fifteenth day of such
month. Proceeds received from the disposition of any of the Securities after
such record date and prior to the following distribution date will be held in
the Principal Account and not distributed until the next distribution date.
The Trustee is not required to pay interest on funds held in any Principal or
Interest Account (but may itself earn interest thereon and therefore benefits
from the use of such funds) nor to make a distribution from the Principal
Account unless the amount available for distribution therein shall equal at
least $1.00 per Unit.
The distribution to the Unitholders of a Trust as of each record date
after the First Settlement Date will be made on the following distribution
date or shortly thereafter and shall consist of an amount substantially equal
to such portion of the Unitholder's pro rata share of the estimated net Annual
interest Income in the Interest Account of such Trust after deducting
estimated expenses. Because interest payments are not received by the Fund at
a constant rate throughout the year, such interest distribution may be more or
less than the amount credited to such Interest Account as of the record date.
For the purpose of minimizing fluctuations in the distributions from an
Interest Account, the Trustee is authorized to advance such amounts as may be
necessary to provide interest distributions of approximately equal amounts.
The Trustee shall be reimbursed, without interest, for any such advances from
funds in the applicable Interest Account on the ensuing record date. Persons
who purchase Units between a record date and a distribution date will receive
their first distribution on the second distribution date after the purchase.
As of the first day of each month, the Trustee will deduct from the
Interest Account and, to the extent funds are not sufficient therein, from the
Principal Account, amounts necessary to pay the expenses of the Fund (as
determined on the basis set forth under "Trust Administration--Fund
Administration and Expenses"). The Trustee also may
<PAGE>
20 Unitholder Explanations
withdraw from said Accounts such amounts, if any, as it deems necessary to
establish a reserve for any governmental charges payable out of the Fund.
Amounts so withdrawn shall not be considered a part of the Fund's assets until
such time as the Trustee shall return all or any part of such amounts to the
appropriate Accounts. In addition, the Trustee may withdraw from the Interest
and Principal Accounts such amounts as may be necessary to cover purchases of
Replacement Bonds and redemptions of Units by the Trustee.
REINVESTMENT OPTION. Unitholders of all unit investment trusts sponsored
by Van Kampen Merritt Inc. (except Unitholders of a New York IM-IT Trust or a
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust), may elect to have each
distribution of interest income, capital gains and/or principal on their Units
automatically reinvested in shares of any of the open ended mutual funds
(except for B shares) listed under "Trust Administration--Sponsor" which are
registered in the Unitholder's state of residence. New York IM-IT Trust and
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust Unitholders, other than
those residing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, may elect to have each
distribution of interest income, capital gains and/or principal on their Units
automatically reinvested in shares of First Investors New York Insured Tax
Free Fund, Inc., a fund which invests primarily in securities exempt from
federal and New York state and city income tax. Such mutual funds are
hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Reinvestment Funds".
Each Reinvestment Fund has investment objectives which differ in certain
respects from those of the Trusts. The prospectus relating to each
Reinvestment Fund describes the investment policies of such fund and sets
forth the procedures to follow to commence reinvestment. A Unitholder may
obtain a prospectus for the respective Reinvestment Funds from Van Kampen
Merritt Inc. at One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181. Texas
residents who desire to reinvest may request that a broker-dealer registered
in Texas send the prospectus relating to the respective fund.
After becoming a participant in a reinvestment plan, each distribution of
interest income, capital gains and/or principal on the participant's Units
will, on the applicable distribution date, automatically be applied, as
directed by such person, as of such distribution date by the Trustee to
purchase shares (or fractions thereof) of the applicable Reinvestment Fund at
a net asset value as computed as of the close of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on such date, plus a sales charge of $1.00 per $100 of reinvestment
except if the participant selects the First Investors New York Insured Tax
Free Fund, Inc., in which case the sales charge will be $1.50 per $100 of
reinvestment, or except if the participant selects the Van Kampen Merritt
Money Market Fund or the Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free Money Fund in which case
no sales charge applies. A minimum of one-half of such sales charge would be
paid to Van Kampen Merritt Inc. for all Reinvestment Funds except First
Investors New York Insured Tax Free Fund, Inc., in which case such sales
charge would be paid to First Investors Management Company, Inc.
Confirmations of all reinvestments by a Unitholder into a Reinvestment
Fund will be mailed to the Unitholder by such Reinvestment Fund.
A participant may at any time prior to five days preceding the next
succeeding distribution date, by so notifying the Trustee in writing, elect to
terminate his or her reinvestment plan and receive future distributions of his
or her Units in cash. There will be no charge or other penalty for such
termination. Each Reinvestment Fund, its sponsor and investment adviser shall
have the right to terminate at any time the reinvestment plan relating to such
fund.
REDEMPTION OF UNITS. A Unitholder may redeem all or a portion of his
Units by tender to the Trustee, at its Unit Investment Trust Division, 101
Barclay Street, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10286, of the certificates
representing the Units to be redeemed, duly endorsed or accompanied by proper
instruments of transfer with signature guaranteed (or by providing
satisfactory indemnity, as in connection with lost, stolen or destroyed
certificates) and by payment of applicable governmental charges, if any. Thus,
redemption of Units cannot be effected until certificates representing such
Units have been delivered to the person seeking redemption or satisfactory
indemnity provided. No redemption fee will be charged. On the seventh calendar
day following such tender, or if the seventh calendar day is not a business
day, on the first business day prior thereto, the Unitholder will be entitled
to receive in cash an amount for each Unit equal to the Redemption Price per
Unit next computed after receipt by the Trustee of such tender of Units. The
"date of tender" is deemed to be the date on which Units are received by the
Trustee, except that as regards Units received after 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on
days of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, the date of tender is
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 21
the next day on which such Exchange is open for trading and such Units will be
deemed to have been tendered to the Trustee on such day for redemption at the
Redemption Price computed on that day.
Under regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service, the Trustee
will be required to withhold a specified percentage of the principal amount of
a Unit redemption if the Trustee has not been furnished the redeeming
Unitholder's tax identification number in the manner required by such
regulations. Any amount so withheld is transmitted to the Internal Revenue
Service and may be recovered by the Unitholder only when filing a return.
Under normal circumstances the Trustee obtains the Unitholder's tax
identification number from the selling broker. However, at any time a
Unitholder elects to tender Units for redemption, such Unitholder should
provide a tax identification number to the Trustee in order to avoid this
possible "back-up withholding" in the event the Trustee has not been
previously provided such number.
Purchased Interest and accrued interest paid on redemption shall be
withdrawn from the Interest Account of such Trust or, if the balance therein
is insufficient, from the Principal Account of such Trust. All other amounts
will be withdrawn from the Principal Account of such Trust. The Trustee is
empowered to sell underlying Securities of a Trust in order to make funds
available for redemption. Units so redeemed shall be cancelled.
The Redemption Price per Unit (as well as the secondary market Public
Offering Price) will be determined on the basis of the bid price of the
Securities in each Trust, while the initial and primary Public Offering Price
of Units will be determined on the basis of the offering price of the
Securities in each Trust, as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on
the New York Stock Exchange on the date any such determination is made. On the
Date of Deposit the Public Offering Price per Unit (which is based on the
offering prices of the Bonds and Purchased Interest in each Trust and includes
the sales charge) exceeded the value at which Units could have been redeemed
(based upon the current bid prices of the Securities and Purchased Interest in
such Trust) by the amount shown under "Summary of Essential Financial
Information". While the Trustee has the power to determine the Redemption
Price per Unit when Units are tendered for redemption, such authority has been
delegated to the Evaluator which determines the price per Unit on a daily
basis. The Redemption Price per Unit is the pro rata share of each Unit in
each Trust on the basis of (i) the cash on hand in such Trust or moneys in the
process of being collected, (ii) the value of the Securities in such Trust
based on the bid prices of the Securities therein, except for cases in which
the value of insurance has been included, (iii) Purchased Interest for each
Trust and (iv) interest accrued thereon, less (a) amounts representing taxes
or other governmental charges payable out of such Trust and (b) the accrued
expenses of such Trust. The Evaluator may determine the value of the
Securities in each Trust by employing any of the methods set forth in "Public
Offering--Offering Price". In determining the Redemption Price per Unit no
value will be assigned to the portfolio insurance maintained on the Bonds in
an Insured Trust unless such Bonds are in default in payment of principal or
interest or in significant risk of such default. For a description of the
situations in which the Evaluator may value the insurance obtained by the
Insured Trusts, see "Public Offering--Offering Price" above.
The price at which Units may be redeemed could be less than the price
paid by the Unitholder and may be less than the par value of the Securities
represented by the Units so redeemed. As stated above, the Trustee may sell
Securities to cover redemptions. When Securities are sold, the size and
diversity of the affected Trust will be reduced. Such sales may be required at
a time when Securities would not otherwise be sold and might result in lower
prices than might otherwise be realized.
The right of redemption may be suspended and payment postponed for any
period during which the New York Stock Exchange is closed, other than for
customary weekend and holiday closings, or during which the Securities and
Exchange Commission determines that trading on that Exchange is restricted or
an emergency exists, as a result of which disposal or evaluation of the
Securities in the Trusts is not reasonably practicable, or for such other
periods as the Securities and Exchange Commission may by order permit. Under
certain extreme circumstances the Sponsor may apply to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for an order permitting a full or partial suspension of
the right of Unitholders to redeem their Units.
REPORTS PROVIDED. The Trustee shall furnish Unitholders of a Trust in
connection with each distribution a statement of the amount of interest and
the amount of other receipts (received since the preceding distribution), if
any, being distributed expressed in each case as a dollar amount representing
the pro rata share of each Unit of a Trust
<PAGE>
22 Unitholder Explanations
outstanding. For as long as the Trustee deems it to be in the best interests
of the Unitholders, the accounts of each Trust shall be audited, not less
frequently than annually, by independent certified public accountants and the
report of such accountants shall be furnished by the Trustee to Unitholders of
such Trusts upon request. Within a reasonable period of time after the end of
each calendar year, the Trustee shall furnish to each person who at any time
during the calendar year was a registered Unitholder of a Trust a statement
(i) as to the Interest Account: interest received (including amounts
representing interest received upon any disposition of Securities) and the
percentage of such interest by states in which the issuers of the Securities
are located, the amount of Purchased Interest, deductions for applicable taxes
and for fees and expenses of such Trust, for purchases of Replacement Bonds
and for redemptions of Units, if any, and the balance remaining after such
distributions and deductions, expressed in each case both as a total dollar
amount and as a dollar amount representing the pro rata share of each Unit
outstanding on the last business day of such calendar year; (ii) as to the
Principal Account: the dates of disposition of any Securities and the net
proceeds received therefrom (excluding any portion representing accrued
interest), the amount paid for purchases of Replacement Bonds and for
redemptions of Units, if any, deductions for payment of applicable taxes and
fees and expenses of the Trustee, the amount of "when issued" interest treated
as a return of capital, if any, and the balance remaining after such
distributions and deductions expressed both as a total dollar amount and as a
dollar amount representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding on the
last business day of such calendar year; (iii) a list of the Securities held
and the number of Units outstanding on the last business day of such calendar
year; (iv) the Redemption Price per Unit based upon the last computation
thereof made during such calendar year; and (v) amounts actually distributed
during such calendar year from the Interest and Principal Accounts, separately
stated, expressed both as total dollar amounts and as dollar amounts
representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding.
In order to comply with Federal and state tax reporting requirements,
Unitholders will be furnished, upon request to the Trustee, evaluations of the
Securities in a Trust furnished to it by the Evaluator.
INSURANCE ON THE BONDS IN THE INSURED TRUSTS
Insurance has been obtained by each Insured Trust or by the issuer of
such Bonds, or by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds in a Trust guaranteeing prompt payment of interest and
principal, when due, in respect of the Bonds in such Trust. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and Securities
Selection". An insurance policy obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, is non-
cancellable and will continue in force so long as such Trust is in existence,
the respective Portfolio Insurer referred to below is still in business and
the Bonds described in such policy continue to be held by such Trust (see
"Portfolio" for the respective Insured Trust). Any portfolio insurance premium
for an Insured Trust, which is an obligation of such Trust, is paid by each
Trust on a monthly basis. Non-payment of premiums on a policy obtained by an
Insured Trust will not result in the cancellation of insurance but will force
the insurer to take action against the Trustee to recover premium payments due
it. The Trustee in turn will be entitled to recover such payments from such
Trust. Premium rates for each issue of Bonds protected by a policy obtained by
an Insured Trust, if any, are fixed for the life of the Trust. The premium for
any Preinsured Bond insurance has been paid by such issuer, by a prior owner
of such Bonds or the Sponsor and any such policy or policies are
non-cancellable and will continue in force so long as the Bonds so insured are
outstanding and the respective Preinsured Bond Insurer remains in business. If
the provider of an original issuance insurance policy is unable to meet its
obligations under such policy or if the rating assigned to the claims-paying
ability of any such insurer deteriorates, the Portfolio Insurers have no
obligation to insure any issue adversely affected by either of the above
described events.
The aforementioned portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any, guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on the Bonds as
they fall due. For the purposes of insurance obtained by an Insured Trust,
"when due" generally means the stated maturity date for the payment of
principal and interest. However, in the event (a) an issuer of a Bond defaults
in the payment of principal or interest on such Bond, (b) such issuer enters
into a bankruptcy proceeding or (c) the maturity of such Bond is accelerated,
the affected Portfolio Insurer has the option, in its sole discretion, after
receiving notice of the earliest to occur of such a default, bankruptcy
proceeding or acceleration to pay the outstanding principal amount of such
Bond plus accrued interest to the date of such payment
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 23
and thereby retire the Bond from the affected Trust prior to such Bond's
stated maturity date. The insurance does not guarantee the market value of the
Bonds or the value of the Units. Insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any, is only effective as to Bonds owned by and held in such Trust. In the
event of a sale of any such Bond by the Trustee, such insurance terminates as
to such Bond on the date of sale.
Pursuant to an irrevocable commitment of the Portfolio Insurers, the
Trustee, upon the sale of a Bond covered under a portfolio insurance policy
obtained by an Insured Trust, has the right to obtain permanent insurance with
respect to such Bond (i.e., insurance to maturity of the Bonds regardless of
the identity of the holder thereof) (the "Permanent Insurance") upon the
payment of a single predetermined insurance premium and any expenses related
thereto from the proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any Bond in
an Insured Trust is eligible to be sold on an insured basis. It is expected
that the Trustee would exercise the right to obtain Permanent Insurance only
if upon such exercise the affected Trust would receive net proceeds (sale of
Bond proceeds less the insurance premium and related expenses attributable to
the Permanent Insurance) from such sale in excess of the sale proceeds if such
Bonds were sold on an uninsured basis. The insurance premium with respect to
each Bond eligible for Permanent Insurance would be determined based upon the
insurability of each Bond as of the Date of Deposit and would not be increased
or decreased for any change in the creditworthiness of each Bond.
The Sponsor believes that the Permanent Insurance option provides an
advantage to an Insured Trust in that each Bond insured by a Trust insurance
policy may be sold out of the affected Trust with the benefits of the
insurance attaching thereto. Thus, the value of the insurance, if any, at the
time of sale, can be realized in the market value of the Bond so sold (which
is not the case in connection with any value attributable to an Insured
Trust's portfolio insurance). See "Public Offering--Offering Price". Because
any such insurance value may be realized in the market value of the Bond upon
the sale thereof upon exercise of the Permanent Insurance option, the Sponsor
anticipates that (a) in the event an Insured Trust were to be comprised of a
substantial percentage of Bonds in default or significant risk of default, it
is much less likely that such Trust would need at some point in time to seek a
suspension of redemptions of Units than if such Trust were to have no such
option (see "Public Offering--Redemption of Units") and (b) at the time of
termination of an Insured Trust, if such Trust were holding defaulted Bonds or
Bonds in significant risk of default such Trust would not need to hold such
Bonds until their respective maturities in order to realize the benefits of
such Trust's portfolio insurance (see "Trust Administration--Amendment or
Termination").
Except as indicated below, insurance obtained by an Insured Trust has no
effect on the price or redemption value of Units. It is the present intention
of the Evaluator to attribute a value for such insurance (including the right
to obtain Permanent Insurance) for the purpose of computing the price or
redemption value of Units if the Bonds covered by such insurance are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default. The value of the insurance will be the difference between (i) the
market value of a Bond which is in default in payment of principal or interest
or in significant risk of such default assuming the exercise of the right to
obtain Permanent Insurance (less the insurance premium and related expenses
attributable to the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value
of such Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. See "Public
Offering--Offering Price". It is also the present intention of the Trustee not
to sell such Bonds to effect redemptions or for any other reason but rather to
retain them in the portfolio because value attributable to the insurance
cannot be realized upon sale. See "Public Offering-- Offering Price" herein
for a more complete description of an Insured Trust's method of valuing
defaulted Bonds and Bonds which have a significant risk of default. Insurance
obtained by the issuer of a Bond is effective so long as such Bond is
outstanding. Therefore, any such insurance may be considered to represent an
element of market value in regard to the Bonds thus insured, but the exact
effect, if any, of this insurance on such market value cannot be predicted.
The portfolio insurance policy or policies obtained by an Insured Trust,
if any, with respect to the Bonds in such Trust were issued by one or more of
the Portfolio Insurers. Any other Preinsured Bond insurance policy (or
commitment therefor) was issued by one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers. See
"Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and
Securities Selection".
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity") is a Wisconsin-domiciled
stock insurance corporation regulated by the Office of the Commissioner of
Insurance of the State of Wisconsin and licensed to do business in 50
<PAGE>
24 Unitholder Explanations
states, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, with
admitted assets of approximately $1,988,000,000 (unaudited) and statutory
capital of approximately $1,148,000,000 (unaudited) as of March 31, 1994.
Statutory capital consists of AMBAC Indemnity's policyholders' surplus and
statutory contingency reserve. AMBAC Indemnity is a wholly owned subsidiary of
AMBAC Inc., a 100% publicly-held company. Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and
Standard & Poor's Corporation have both assigned a triple-A claims-paying
ability rating to AMBAC Indemnity.
Copies of its financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting standards are available from AMBAC Indemnity. The address of AMBAC
Indemnity's administrative offices and its telephone number are One State
Street Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, 10004 and (212) 668-0340.
AMBAC Indemnity has entered into quota share reinsurance agreements under
which a percentage of the insurance underwritten pursuant to certain municipal
bond insurance programs of AMBAC Indemnity has been and will be assumed by a
number of foreign and domestic unaffiliated reinsurers.
Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation ("MBIA") is the principal
operating subsidiary of MBIA Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed company.
MBIA Inc. is not obligated to pay the debts of or claims against MBIA. MBIA is
a limited liability corporation rather than a several liability association.
MBIA is domiciled in the State of New York and licensed to do business in all
fifty states, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. As
of March 31, 1994 MBIA had admitted assets of $3.2 billion (unaudited), total
liabilities of $2.2 billion (unaudited), and total capital and surplus of $998
million (unaudited) determined in accordance with statutory accounting
practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. Copies
of MBIA's year end financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting practices are available from MBIA. The address of MBIA is 113 King
Street, Armonk, New York 10504.
Effective December 31, 1989, MBIA Inc. acquired Bond Investors Group,
Inc. On January 5, 1990, MBIA acquired all of the outstanding stock of Bond
Investors Group, Inc., the parent of Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance Company
(BIG), now known as MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois. Through a reinsurance
agreement, BIG has ceded all of its net insured risks, as well as its unearned
premium and contingency reserves, to MBIA and MBIA has reinsured BIG's net
outstanding exposure.
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rates all bond issues insured by MBIA
"Aaa" and short term loans "MIG 1," both designated to be of the highest
quality.
Standard & Poor's Corporation rates all new issues insured by MBIA "AAA"
Prime Grade.
The Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating of MBIA should be evaluated
independently of the Standard & Poor's Corporation rating of MBIA. No
application has been made to any other rating agency in order to obtain
additional ratings on the Bonds. The ratings reflect the respective rating
agency's current assessment of the creditworthiness of MBIA and its ability to
pay claims on its policies of insurance. Any further explanation as to the
significance of the above ratings may be obtained only from the applicable
rating agency.
The above ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Bonds,
and such ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the
rating agencies. Any downward revision or withdrawal of either or both ratings
may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds.
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty" or "FGIC") is
a wholly-owned subsidiary of FGIC Corporation (the "Corporation"), a Delaware
holding company. The Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General
Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC"). Neither the Corporation nor GECC is
obligated to pay the debts of or the claims against Financial Guaranty.
Financial Guaranty is domiciled in the State of New York and is subject to
regulation by the State of New York Insurance Department. As of June 30, 1994,
the total capital and surplus of Financial Guaranty was approximately
$850,000,000. Copies of Financial Guaranty's financial statements, prepared on
the basis of statutory accounting principles, and the Corporation's financial
statements, prepared on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles,
may be obtained by writing to Financial Guaranty at 115 Broadway, New York,
New York 10006, Attention: Communications Department, telephone number: (212)
312-3000 or to the New
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 25
York State Insurance Department at 160 West Broadway, 18th Floor, New York,
New York 10013, Attention: Property Companies Bureau, telephone number: (212)
621-0389.
In addition, Financial Guaranty Insurance Company is currently licensed
to write insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. ("Financial Security" or "FSA") is a
monoline insurance company incorporated on March 16, 1984 under the laws of
the State of New York. The operations of Financial Security commenced on July
25, 1985, and Financial Security received its New York State insurance license
on September 23, 1985. Financial Security and its two wholly owned
subsidiaries are licensed to engage in the financial guaranty insurance
business in 49 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
Financial Security and its subsidiaries are engaged exclusively in the
business of writing financial guaranty insurance, principally in respect of
asset-backed and other collateralized securities offered in domestic and
foreign markets. Financial Security and its subsidiaries also write financial
guaranty insurance in respect of municipal and other obligations and reinsure
financial guaranty insurance policies written by other leading insurance
companies. In general, financial guaranty insurance consists of the issuance
of a guaranty of scheduled payments of an issuer's securities, thereby
enhancing the credit rating of those securities, in consideration for payment
of a premium to the insurer.
Financial Security is approximately 91.6% owned by U S WEST, Inc. and
8.4% owned by The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. ("Tokio Marine").
Neither U S WEST, Inc. nor Tokio Marine is obligated to pay the debts of or
the claims against Financial Security. Financial Security is domiciled in the
State of New York and is subject to regulation by the State of New York
Insurance Department. As of March 31, 1993, the total policyholders' surplus
and contingency reserves and the total unearned premium reserve, respectively,
of Financial Security and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, approximately $479,110,000
(unaudited) and $220,078,000 (unaudited), and the total shareholders' equity
and the total unearned premium reserve, respectively, of Financial Security
and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, approximately $628,119,000 (unaudited) and $202,493,000
(unaudited). Copies of Financial Security's financial statements may be
obtained by writing to Financial Security at 350 Park Avenue, New York, New
York, 10022, Attention: Communications Department. Its telephone number is
(212) 826-0100.
Pursuant to an intercompany agreement, liabilities on financial guaranty
insurance written by Financial Security or either of its subsidiaries are
reinsured among such companies on an agreed-upon percentage substantially
proportional to their respective capital, surplus and reserves, subject to
applicable statutory risk limitations. In addition, Financial Security
reinsures a portion of its liabilities under certain of its financial guaranty
insurance policies with unaffiliated reinsurers under various quota share
treaties and on a transaction-by-transaction basis. Such reinsurance is
utilized by Financial Security as a risk management device and to comply with
certain statutory and rating agency requirements; it does not alter or limit
Financial Security's obligations under any financial guaranty insurance
policy.
Financial Security's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa" by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc., and "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation, Nippon
Investors Service Inc., Duff & Phelps Inc. and Australian Ratings Pty. Ltd.
Such ratings reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies, are not
recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
Capital Guaranty Insurance Company ("Capital Guaranty") is a "Aaa/AAA"
rated monoline stock insurance company incorporated in the State of Maryland,
and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Capital Guaranty Corporation, a Maryland
insurance holding company. Capital Guaranty Corporation is a publicly owned
company whose shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Capital Guaranty is authorized to provide insurance in 49 states, the
District of Columbia and three U.S. territories. Capital Guaranty focuses on
insuring municipal securities and our policies guaranty the timely payment of
principal and interest when due for payment on new issue and secondary market
issue municipal bond transactions. Capital Guaranty's claims-paying ability is
rated "Triple-A" by both Moody's and Standard & Poor's.
<PAGE>
26 Unitholder Explanations
As of June 30, 1994, Capital Guaranty had more than $13.7 billion in net
exposure outstanding (excluding defeased issues). The total statutory
policyholders' surplus and contingency reserve of Capital Guaranty was
$89,917,075 (unaudited), and the total admitted assets were $286,825,253
(unaudited) as reported to the Insurance Department of the State of Maryland
as of June 30, 1994. Financial statements for Capital Guaranty Insurance
Company, that have been prepared in accordance with statutory insurance
accounting standards, are available upon request. The address of Capital
Guaranty's headquarters and its telephone number are Steuart Tower, 22nd
Floor, One Market Plaza, San Francisco, CA 94105-1413 and (415) 995-8000.
CapMAC is a New York-domiciled monoline stock insurance company which
engages only in the business of financial guarantee and surety insurance.
CapMAC is licensed in 50 states in addition to the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the territory of Guam. CapMAC insures
structured asset-backed, corporate, municipal and other financial obligations
in the domestic and foreign capital markets. CapMAC may also provide financial
guarantee reinsurance for structured asset-backed, corporate and municipal
obligations written by other major insurance companies.
CapMAC's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa" by Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. ("Moody's"), "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation ("Standard &
Poor's"), "AAA" by Duff & Phelps, Inc. ("Duff & Phelps") and "AAA" by Nippon
Investors Inc. Such ratings reflect only the views of the respective rating
agencies, are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are
subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
CapMAC is wholly owned by CapMAC Holdings Inc. ("Holdings"), a company
that is owned by a group of institutional and other investors, including
CapMAC's management and employees.
Neither Holdings nor any of its stockholders is obligated to pay any
claims under any surety bond issued by CapMAC or any debts of CapMAC or to
make additional capital contributions.
CapMAC is regulated by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of
New York. In addition, CapMAC is subject to regulation by the insurance
departments of the other jurisdictions in which it is licensed. CapMAC is
subject to periodic regulatory examinations by the same regulatory
authorities.
CapMAC is bound by insurance laws and regulations regarding capital
transfers, limitations upon dividends, investment of assets, changes in
control, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and acquisitions. The
amount of exposure per risk that CapMAC may retain, after giving effect to
reinsurance, collateral or other security, is also regulated. Statutory and
regulatory accounting practices may prescribe appropriate rates at which
premiums are earned and the levels of reserves required. In addition, various
insurance laws restrict the incurrence of debt, regulate permissible
investments of reserves, capital and surplus, and govern the form of surety
bonds.
CapMAC's obligations under the Surety Bond(s) may be reinsured. Such
reinsurance does not relieve CapMAC of any of its obligations under the Surety
Bond(s).
THE SURETY BOND IS NOT COVERED BY THE PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE
SECURITY FUND SPECIFIED IN ARTICLE 76 OF THE NEW YORK INSURANCE LAW.
As of December 31, 1993 and 1992, CapMAC had qualified statutory capital
(which consists of policyholders' surplus and contingency reserve) of
approximately $168 million and $163 million, respectively, and had not
incurred any debt obligations. Article 69 of the New York State Insurance Law
requires CapMAC to establish and maintain the contingency reserve, which is
available to cover claims under surety bonds issued by CapMAC.
In addition to its qualified statutory capital and other reinsurance
available to pay claims under its surety bonds, CapMAC has entered into a Stop
Loss Reinsurance Agreement (the "Stop Loss Agreement") with Winterthur Swiss
Insurance Company (the "Reinsurer"), which is rated AAA by Standard & Poor's
and Aaa by Moody's, pursuant to which the Reinsurer will be required to pay
any losses incurred by CapMAC during the term of the Stop Loss Agreement on
the surety bonds covered under the Stop Loss Agreement in excess of a
specified amount of losses incurred by CapMAC under such surety bonds (such
specified amount initially being $100 million and increasing annually by an
amount equal to 66 2/3% of the increase in CapMAC's statutory capital and
surplus) up to an aggregate limit payable under the Stop Loss Agreement of $50
million. The Stop Loss Agreement has a term of seven years, is extendable for
one-year periods and is subject to early termination upon the occurrence of
certain events.
<PAGE>
Unitholder Explanations 27
CapMAC also has available a $100,000,000 standby corporate liquidity
facility (the "Liquidity Facility") provided by a syndicate of banks rated
A1+/P1 by Standard & Poor's and Moody's, respectively, having a term of 360
days. Under the Liquidity Facility CapMAC will be able, subject to satisfying
certain conditions, to borrow funds from time to time in order to enable it to
fund any claim payments or payments made in settlement or mitigation of claims
payments under its surety bonds, including the Surety Bond.
Copies of CapMAC's financial statements prepared in accordance with
statutory accounting standards, which differ from generally accepted
accounting principles, and filed with the Insurance Department of the State of
New York are available upon request. CapMAC is located at 885 Third Avenue,
New York, New York 10022, and its telephone number is (212) 755-1155.
In order to be in an Insured Trust, Bonds must be insured by one of the
Preinsured Bond Insurers or be eligible for the insurance being obtained by
such Trust. In determining eligibility for insurance, the Preinsured Bond
Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and Financial Guaranty have applied their own
standards which correspond generally to the standards they normally use in
establishing the insurability of new issues of municipal bonds and which are
not necessarily the criteria used in the selection of Bonds by the Sponsor. To
the extent the standards of the Preinsured Bond Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and
Financial Guaranty are more restrictive than those of the Sponsor, the
previously stated Trust investment criteria have been limited with respect to
the Bonds. This decision is made prior to the Date of Deposit, as debt
obligations not eligible for insurance are not deposited in an Insured Trust.
Thus, all of the Bonds in the portfolios of the Insured Trusts in the Fund are
insured either by the respective Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds, by a
prior owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Bonds
in a Trust.
Because the Bonds are insured by one of the Portfolio Insurers or one of
the Preinsured Bond Insurers as to the timely payment of principal and
interest, when due, and on the basis of the various reinsurance agreements in
effect, Standard & Poor's Corporation has assigned to the Units of each
Insured Trust its "AAA" investment rating. See "Description of Securities
Ratings". The obtaining of this rating by an Insured Trust should not be
construed as an approval of the offering of the Units by Standard & Poor's
Corporation or as a guarantee of the market value of such Trust or of the
Units.
On the date of this Prospectus, the Estimated Current Returns on the
Securities in the IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust and New York IM-IT Trust were
4.36% and 5.58%, respectively, after payment of the insurance premium or
premiums payable by each Trust, while the Estimated Long-Term Returns on such
Trusts were 4.61% and 5.67%, respectively. The Estimated Current Returns on
identical portfolios without the insurance obtained by the above-mentioned
Trusts would have been 4.37% and 5.60%, respectively, on such date, while the
Estimated Long-Term Returns on identical portfolios without the insurance
obtained by the above mentioned Trusts would have been 4.62% and 5.68%,
respectively.
An objective of portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is to
obtain a higher yield on the portfolio of such Trust than would be available
if all the Securities in such portfolio had Standard & Poor's Corporation
"AAA" rating and yet at the same time to have the protection of insurance of
prompt payment of interest and principal, when due, on the Bonds. There is, of
course, no certainty that this result will be achieved. Preinsured Bonds in an
Insured Trust (all of which are rated "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation)
may or may not have a higher yield than uninsured bonds rated "AAA" by
Standard & Poor's Corporation. In selecting such Bonds for an Insured Trust,
the Sponsor has applied the criteria hereinbefore described.
In the event of nonpayment of interest or principal, when due, in respect
of a Bond, AMBAC Indemnity shall make such payment not later than 30 days and
Financial Guaranty shall make such payment within one business day after the
respective insurer has been notified that such nonpayment has occurred or is
threatened (but not earlier than the date such payment is due). The insurer,
as regards any payment it may make, will succeed to the rights of the Trustee
in respect thereof. All policies issued by the Portfolio Insurers and the
Preinsured Bond Insurers are substantially identical insofar as obligations to
an Insured Trust are concerned.
The Internal Revenue Service has issued a letter ruling which holds in
effect that insurance proceeds representing maturing interest on defaulted
municipal obligations paid to holders of insured bonds, under policy
<PAGE>
28 Unitholder Explanations
provisions substantially identical to the policies described herein, will be
excludable from Federal gross income under Section 103(a)(1) of the Internal
Revenue Code to the same extent as if such payments were made by the issuer of
the municipal obligations. Holders of Units in an Insured Trust should discuss
with their tax advisers the degree of reliance which they may place on this
letter ruling. However, Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, has given
an opinion to the effect such payment of proceeds would be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations. See
"Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
Each Portfolio Insurer is subject to regulation by the department of
insurance in the state in which it is qualified to do business. Such
regulation, however, is no guarantee that each Portfolio Insurer will be able
to perform on its contract of insurance in the event a claim should be made
thereunder at some time in the future. At the date hereof, it is reported that
no claims have been submitted or are expected to be submitted to any of the
Portfolio Insurers which would materially impair the ability of any such
company to meet its commitment pursuant to any contract of bond or portfolio
insurance.
The information relating to each Portfolio Insurer has been furnished by
such companies. The financial information with respect to each Portfolio
Insurer appears in reports filed with state insurance regulatory authorities
and is subject to audit and review by such authorities. No representation is
made herein as to the accuracy or adequacy of such information or as to the
absence of material adverse changes in such information subsequent to the
dates thereof.
The Bonds in the Insured Trusts are insured as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BONDS INSURED BONDS INSURED
UNDER AMBAC UNDER FINANCIAL
INDEMNITY GUARANTY PREINSURED
TRUST PORTFOLIO INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INSURANCE BONDS TOTAL
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT Short Intermediate............................ 7% 0% 93% 100%
IM-IT Limited Maturity.............................. 0% 0% 100% 100%
California IM-IT.................................... 0% 0% 100% 100%
Florida IM-IT....................................... 0% 0% 100% 100%
Michigan IM-IT...................................... 0% 0% 100% 100%
New York IM-IT...................................... 7% 0% 93% 100%
</TABLE>
The breakdown of the Preinsured Bonds is as follows: IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 23%, Financial Guaranty 23%, MBIA 19% and
FSA 28%; IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 5%, Financial Guaranty
15%, MBIA 65% and FSA 15%; California IM-IT Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 24%,
Financial Guaranty 8%, MBIA 61% and FSA 7%; Florida IM-IT Trust--AMBAC
Indemnity 20%, Capital Guaranty 6%, Financial Guaranty 33% and MBIA 41%;
Michigan IM-IT Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 16%, Financial Guaranty 32%, MBIA 36%
and FSA 16%; New York IM-IT Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 10% and MBIA 83%.
<PAGE>
IM-IT-- 94th Short Intermediate Series 29
IM-IT SHORT INTERMEDIATE TRUST
GENERAL. The IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust consists of 11 issues of
Securities. Five of the Bonds in the IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust are
general obligations of the governmental entities issuing them and are backed
by the taxing power thereof. The remaining issues are payable from the income
of a specific project or authority and are not supported by the issuer's power
to levy taxes. These issues are located in 7 states or territories, divided by
purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount of total IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 5 (43%); Higher
Education, 2 (17%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (14%); Health Care, 1 (12%);
General Purpose, 1 (10%) and Public Education, 1 (4%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating. All of the obligations in the IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust mature within 3-7 years of the Date of Deposit. The dollar
weighted average maturity of the Bonds in the Trust is 5.0 years.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax
Status".
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME <F1>
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 46.56
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>............................................................. $ 1.76
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... $ .09
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 44.71
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 44.71
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 3.73
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .12418
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F3><F4><F5>....................................... 4.36%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F3><F4><F5>........................................................................ 4.61%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 3.85
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F5>.................................................................... $ 3.73
PURCHASED INTEREST <F6>........................................................................................ $ 7.69
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>.............. $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately
$.11 per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per
Unit prior to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if
issued" Bonds included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest
exceed such amount, the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee.
After the first year, the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated
above. Estimated annual interest income per Unit will be increased to
$46.67. Estimated Annual Expense per Unit (excluding insurance) will be
increased to $1.87; and estimated net annual interest income per Unit
will remain the same as shown. See "Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns". Based on the outstanding principal amount
of Securities as of the Date of Deposit, the Trustee's annual fee would
be $6,875.
<F2> Excluding insurance costs.
<F3> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F5> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F6> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
30 IM-IT-- 94th Short Intermediate Series
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
94TH SHORT INTERMEDIATE SERIES (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND IM-IT SHORT
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION INTERMEDIATE
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 685,000 South Orange County Public Financing Authority (California)
Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 1994C (Foothill Area) FGIC
Insured
4.70% Due 8/15/1998.......................................... YAAA $ 683,890
1,000,000 District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.) Refunding General
Obligation Bonds, Series 1993C (FSA Insured)**
#4.90% Due 12/1/1998......................................... AAA 1,003,750
200,000 Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority (Seattle
University) Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1994 (AMBAC
Indemnity Insured)
5.20% Due 5/1/1999........................................... AAA 201,970
1,000,000 Regional Transportation Authority, Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake,
McHenry and Will Counties, Illinois, General Obligation
Bonds, Series 1994B (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
#5.20% Due 6/1/1999.......................................... AAA 1,009,940
400,000 Glendale Elementary School District No.40 of Maricopa County,
Arizona, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1993
(AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
#0.00% Due 7/1/1999.......................................... AAA 313,196<F6>
100,000 Kyrene Elementary School District No.28 of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Refunding General Obligation Bonds, Series 1992
(FGIC Insured)
#0.00% Due 7/1/1999.......................................... AAA 78,299<F6>
500,000 State of California, Various Purpose General Obligation Bonds**
5.00% Due 8/1/1999........................................... A 499,375
1,000,000 New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Higher Education Equipment Leasing Fund Program Issue, Series
1994A (MBIA Insured)
#5.00% Due 9/1/1999.......................................... YAAA 1,001,560
315,000 Public Building Commission of Chicago, Illinois, Building
Revenue Bonds, Series 1993A (Board of Education of the City
of Chicago) MBIA Insured
#4.70% Due 12/1/1999......................................... AAA 311,126
1,000,000 Washington Public Power Supply System, Nuclear Project No.1,
Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1993B (FSA Insured)
5.00% Due 7/1/2000........................................... AAA 996,200
815,000 City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 1993
(St. Luke's Methodist Project) FGIC Insured**
#5.40% Due 8/15/2000......................................... AAA 824,209
$ 7,015,000 $ 6,923,515
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers (as indicated in the Bond name) or under the portfolio insurance
policy obtained by the Trust from AMBAC Indemnity. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
IM-IT-- 76th Limited Maturity Series 31
IM-IT LIMITED MATURITY TRUST
GENERAL. The IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust consists of 9 issues of
Securities. Five of the Bonds in the IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust are general
obligations of the governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the
taxing power thereof. The remaining issues are payable from the income of a
specific project or authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to
levy taxes. These issues are located in 9 states or territories, divided by
purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to total IM-IT Limited
Maturity Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 5 (58%); Multi-Family
Mortgage Revenue, 2 (20%); Public Building, 1 (14%) and Health Care, 1 (8%).
No Bond issue has received a provisional rating. All of the obligations in the
IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust mature approximately within 12-15 years of the
Date of Deposit. The dollar weighted average maturity of the Bonds in the
Trust is 14.2 years.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax
Status".
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME <F1>
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 57.07
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>............................................................. $ 1.86
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.21
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.21
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.60
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15336
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F3><F4><F5>....................................... 5.40%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F3><F4><F5>........................................................................ 5.54%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.75
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F5>.................................................................... $ 4.60
PURCHASED INTEREST <F6>........................................................................................ $ 9.52
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>.............. $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately
$.07 per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per
Unit prior to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if
issued" Bonds included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest
exceed such amount, the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee.
After the first year, the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated
above. Estimated annual interest income per Unit will be increased to
$57.14. Estimated Annual Expense per Unit (excluding insurance) will be
increased to $1.93; and estimated net annual interest income per Unit
will remain the same as shown. See "Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns". Based on the outstanding principal amount
of Securities as of the Date of Deposit, the Trustee's annual fee would
be $4,900.
<F2> Excluding insurance costs.
<F3> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F5> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F6> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
32 IM-IT-- 76th Limited Maturity Series
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
76TH LIMITED MATURITY SERIES (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND IM-IT LIMITED
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION MATURITY
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 750,000 District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.) General Obligation
Bonds, Series 1994B (MBIA Insured)
#6.00% Due 6/1/2007.......................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 $ 750,360
425,000 Wisconsin State Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (Memorial Hospital of Iowa County,
Inc./SSM Health Care) MBIA Insured
5.90% Due 6/1/2008........................................... AAA 2003 @ 101 419,237
745,000 Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, Multi-Family
Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (National Center for
Housing Management Project) FSA Insured 2004 @ 102
5.60% Due 7/1/2008........................................... AAA 2004 @ 100 S.F. 714,179
250,000 Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Housing Project Revenue
Bonds, Series 1993A (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2003 @ 102
5.95% Due 10/1/2008.......................................... AAA 2006 @ 100 S.F. 248,260
245,000 City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, Limited Tax-General
Obligation Bonds, Series 1994B (MBIA Insured)**
6.00% Due 12/1/2008.......................................... YAAA 2004 @ 100 246,225
655,000 Allendale, Michigan, Public School District, Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation Bonds (MBIA Insured)
#5.875% Due 5/1/2009......................................... YAAA 2004 @ 101 650,297
750,000 Chicago, Illinois, School Finance Authority, General Obligation
School Assistance Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (FGIC
Insured)
#5.50% Due 6/1/2009.......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 703,388
500,000 The School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General
Obligation Bonds, Series 1994A (MBIA Insured)
5.85% Due 7/1/2009........................................... AAA 2004 @ 101.25 490,360
680,000 Los Angeles, California, Convention and Exhibition Center
Authority, Lease Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 1993A (MBIA
Insured)
#5.20% Due 8/15/2009......................................... AAA 2003 @ 102 620,786
$ 5,000,000 $ 4,843,092
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
California IM-IT-- Series 131 33
CALIFORNIA IM-IT TRUST
GENERAL. The California IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities.
One of the Bonds in the California IM-IT Trust is a general obligation of the
governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing power thereof. The
remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total California IM-IT Trust) as follows: Certificates of Participation, 2
(29%); Water and Sewer, 2 (24%); General Obligations, 1 (16%); Health Care, 1
(16%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (8%) and Tax District, 1 (7%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating.
RISK FACTORS. The Trust will invest substantially all of its assets in
California Municipal Obligations. The Trust is therefore susceptible to
political, economic or regulatory factors affecting issuers of California
Municipal Obligations. These include the possible adverse effects of certain
California constitutional amendments, legislative measures, voter initiatives
and other matters that are described below. The following information provides
only a brief summary of the complex factors affecting the financial situation
in California (the "State") and is derived from sources that are generally
available to investors and are believed to be accurate. No independent
verification has been made of the accuracy or completeness of any of the
following information. It is based in part on information obtained from
various State and local agencies in California or contained in official
statements for various California Municipal Obligations.
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local governmental finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of California Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Fund or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
California's economy is the largest among the 50 states and one of the
largest in the world. The State's population of over 30 million represents 12%
of the total United States population and grew by 27% in the 1980s. Total
personal income in the State, at an estimated $662 billion in 1991, accounts
for 13% of all personal income in the nation. Total employment is almost 14
million, the majority of which is in the service, trade and manufacturing
sectors.
Reports issued by the State Department of Finance and other sources
indicate that the State's economy is suffering its worst recession since the
1930s, with prospects for recovery slower than for the nation as a whole. The
State has lost over 800,000 jobs since the start of the recession in mid 1990
and additional job losses are expected before an upturn begins. The largest
job losses have been in Southern California, led by declines in the aerospace
and construction industries. Weaknesses statewide occurred in manufacturing,
construction, services and trade and will be hurt in the next few years by
continued cuts in federal defense spending and base closures. Unemployment is
expected to remain well above the national average in 1994. The State's
economy is only expected to pull out of the recession slowly, following the
national recovery which has begun. Delay in recovery will exacerbate
shortfalls in State revenues.
Certain California Municipal Obligations may be obligations of issuers
which rely in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, on ad valorem property
taxes as a source of revenue. The taxing powers of California local
governments and districts are limited by Article XIIIA of the California
Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1978 and commonly known as "Proposition
13." Briefly, Article XIIIA limits to 1% of full cash value the rate of ad
valorem property taxes on real property and generally restricts the
reassessment of property to 2% per year, except upon new construction or
change of ownership (subject to a number of exemptions). Taxing entities may,
however, raise ad valorem taxes above the 1% limit to pay debt service on
voter-approved bonded indebtedness.
Under Article XIIIA, the basic 1% ad valorem tax levy is applied against
the assessed value of property as of the owner's date of acquisition (or as of
March 1, 1975, if acquired earlier), subject to certain adjustments. This
system has resulted in widely varying amounts of tax on similarly situated
properties. Several lawsuits have been filed challenging the acquisition-based
assessment system of Proposition 13, and on June 18, 1992 the U.S. Supreme
Court announced a decision upholding Proposition 13.
<PAGE>
34 California IM-IT-- Series 131
Article XIIIA prohibits local governments from raising revenues through
ad valorem property taxes above the 1% limit; it also requires voters of any
governmental unit to give two-thirds approval to levy any "special tax." Court
decisions, however, allowed non-voter approved levy of "general taxes" which
were not dedicated to a specific use. In response to these decisions, the
voters of the State in 1986 adopted an initiative statute which imposed
significant new limits on the ability of local entities to raise or levy
general taxes, except by receiving majority local voter approval. Significant
elements of this initiative, "Proposition 62", have been overturned in recent
court cases. An initiative proposed to re-enact the provisions of Proposition
62 as a constitutional amendment was defeated by the voters in November 1990,
but such a proposal may be renewed in the future.
California and its local governments are subject to an annual
"appropriations limit" imposed by Article XIIIB of the California
Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1979 and significantly amended by
Propositions 98 and 111 in 1988 and 1990, respectively. Article XIIIB
prohibits the State or any covered local government from spending
"appropriations subject to limitation" in excess of the appropriations limit
imposed. "Appropriations subject to limitation" are authorizations to spend
"proceeds of taxes," which consists of tax revenues and certain other funds,
including proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges or other fees, to
the extent that such proceeds exceed the cost of providing the product or
service, but "proceeds of taxes" excludes most State subventions to local
governments. No limit is imposed on appropriations of funds which are not
"proceeds of taxes," such as reasonable user charges or fees and certain other
non-tax funds, including bond proceeds.
Among the expenditures not included in the Article XIIIB appropriations
limit are (1) the debt service cost of bonds issued or authorized prior to
January 1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, (2) appropriations
arising from certain emergencies declared by the Governor, (3) appropriations
for certain capital outlay projects, (4) appropriations by the State of
post-1989 increases in gasoline taxes and vehicle weight fees, and (5)
appropriations made in certain cases of emergency.
The appropriations limit for each year is adjusted annually to reflect
changes in cost of living and population, and any transfers of service
responsibilities between government units. The definitions for such
adjustments were liberalized in 1990 by Proposition 111 to follow more closely
growth in California's economy.
"Excess" revenues are measured over a two-year cycle. Local governments
must return any excess to taxpayers by rate reduction. The State must refund
50% of any excess, with the other 50% paid to schools and community colleges.
With more liberal annual adjustment factors since 1988, and depressed revenues
since 1990 because of the recession, few governments are currently operating
near their spending limits, but this condition may change over time. Local
governments may by voter approval exceed their spending limits for up to four
years.
During fiscal year 1986-87, State receipts from proceeds of taxes
exceeded its appropriations limit by $1.1 billion, which was returned to
taxpayers. Since that year, appropriations subject to limitation have been
under the State limit. State appropriations are expected to be $3.7 billion
under the limit for Fiscal Year 1993-94.
Because of the complex nature of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB of the
California Constitution, the ambiguities and possible inconsistencies in their
terms, and the impossibility of predicting future appropriations or changes in
population and cost of living, and the probability of continuing legal
challenges, it is not currently possible to determine fully the impact of
Article XIIIA or Article XIIIB on California Municipal Obligations or on the
ability of California or local governments to pay debt service on such
California Municipal Obligations. It is not presently possible to predict the
outcome of any pending litigation with respect to the ultimate scope, impact
or constitutionality of either Article XIIIA or Article XIIIB, or the impact
of any such determinations upon State agencies or local governments, or upon
their ability to pay debt service on their obligations. Future initiative or
legislative changes in laws or the California Constitution may also affect the
ability of the State or local issuers to repay their obligations.
As of April 1, 1994, California had approximately $18.1 billion of
general obligation bonds outstanding, and $5.6 billion remained authorized but
unissued. In addition, at June 30, 1993, the State had lease-purchase
obligations, payable from the State's General Fund, of approximately $4.0
billion. Of the State's outstanding general obligation debt, approximately 28%
is presently self-liquidating (for which program revenues are anticipated to
be sufficient to reimburse the General Fund for debt service payments). Four
general obligation bond propositions, totalling $5.9
<PAGE>
California IM-IT-- Series 131 35
billion, will be on the June, 1994 ballot. In Fiscal Year 1992-93, debt
service on general obligation bonds and lease-purchase debt was approximately
4.1% of General Fund revenues. The State has paid the principal of and
interest on its general obligation bonds, lease-purchase debt and short-term
obligations when due.
The principal sources of General Fund revenues in 1992-93 were the
California personal income tax (44% of total revenues), the sales tax (38%),
bank and corporation taxes (12%), and the gross premium tax on insurance (3%).
California maintains a Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties (the "Economic
Uncertainties Fund"), derived from General Fund revenues, as a reserve to meet
cash needs of the General Fund, but which is required to be replenished as
soon as sufficient revenues are available. Year-end balances in the Economic
Uncertainties Fund are included for financial reporting purposes in the
General Fund balance. In most recent years, California has budgeted to
maintain the Economic Uncertainties Fund at around 3% of General Fund
expenditures but essentially no reserve has been budgeted in 1992-93 or
1993-1994 because reserves have been reduced by the recession.
Throughout the 1980s, State spending increased rapidly as the State
population and economy also grew rapidly, including increased spending for
many assistance programs to local governments, which were constrained by
Proposition 13 and other laws. The largest State program is assistance to
local public school districts. In 1988, an initiative (Proposition 98) was
enacted which (subject to suspension by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature
and the Governor) guarantees local school districts and community college
districts a minimum share of State General Fund revenues (currently about
34%).
Since the start of 1990-91 Fiscal Year, the State has faced adverse
economic, fiscal and budget conditions. The economic recession seriously
affected State tax revenues. It also caused increased expenditures for health
and welfare programs. The State is also facing a structural imbalance in its
budget with the largest programs supported by the General Fund (education,
health, welfare and corrections) growing at rates significantly higher than
the growth rates for the principal revenue sources of the General Fund. As a
result, the State entered a period of budget imbalance, with expenditures
exceeding revenues for four of the last five fiscal years through 1991-92.
As the State fell into a deep recession in the summer of 1990, the State
budget fell sharply out of balance in the 1990-91 and 1991-92 fiscal years,
despite significant expenditure cuts and tax increases. The State had
accumulated a $2.8 billion budget deficit by June 30, 1992. This deficit also
severely reduced the State's cash resources, so that it had to rely on
external borrowing in the short-term markets to meet its cash needs.
With the failure to enact a budget by July 1, 1992, the State had no
legal authority to pay many of its vendors until the budget was passed;
nevertheless, certain obligations (such as debt service, school
apportionments, welfare payments and employee salaries) were payable because
of continuing or special appropriations or court orders. However, the State
Controller did not have enough cash to pay all of these ongoing obligations as
they came due, as well as valid obligations incurred in the prior fiscal year.
Starting on July 1, 1992, the Controller was required to issue
"registered warrants" in lieu of normal warrants backed by cash to pay many
State obligations. Available cash was used to pay constitutionally mandated
and priority obligations. Between July 1 and September 3, 1992, the Controller
issued an aggregate of approximately $3.8 billion of registered warrants, all
of which were called for redemption by September 4, 1992 following enactment
of the 1992-93 Budget Act and issuance by the State of $3.3 billion of Interim
Notes.
The 1992-93 Budget Act, when finally adopted, was projected to eliminate
the State's accumulated deficit, with additional expenditure cuts and a $1.3
billion transfer of State education funding costs to local governments by
shifting local property taxes to school districts. However, as the recession
continued longer and deeper than expected, revenues once again were far below
projections, and only reached a level just equal to the amount of
expenditures. Thus, the State continued to carry its $2.8 billion budget
deficit at June 30, 1993.
The 1993-94 Budget Act was similar to the prior year, in reliance on
expenditure cuts and an additional $2.6 billion transfer of costs to local
government, particularly counties. A major feature of the budget was a
two-year plan to eliminate the accumulated deficit by borrowing into the
1994-95 fiscal year. With the recession still continuing longer than expected,
the 1994-95 Governor's Budget now projects that in the 1993-94 Fiscal Year,
the General Fund will have $900 million less revenue and $800 million higher
expenditures than budgeted. As a result revenues will only
<PAGE>
36 California IM-IT-- Series 131
exceed expenditures by about $400 million. If this projection is met, it will
be the first operating surplus in four years; however, some budget analysts
outside the Department of Finance project revenues in the balance of 1993-94
will not even meet the revised, lower projection. In addition, the General
Fund may have some unplanned costs for relief related to the January, 17, 1994
Northridge earthquake.
The State has implemented its short-term borrowing as part of the deficit
elimination plan, and has also borrowed additional sums to cover cash flow
shortfalls in the spring of 1994, for a total of $3.2 billion, coming due in
July and December, 1994. Repayment of these short-term notes will require
additional borrowing, as the State's cash position continues to be adversely
affected.
The Governor's 1994-95 Budget proposal recognizes the need to bridge a
gap of around $5 billion by June 30, 1995. Over $3.1 billion of this amount is
being requested from the federal government as increased aid, particularly for
costs associated with incarcerating, educating and providing health and
welfare services to undocumented immigrants. However, President Clinton has
not included these costs in his proposed Fiscal 1995 Budget. The rest of the
budget gap is proposed to be closed with expenditure cuts and projected $600
million of new revenue assuming the State wins a tax case presently pending in
the U.S. Supreme Court. Thus the State will once again face significant
uncertainties and very difficult choices in the 1994-95 budget, as tax
increases are unlikely and many cuts and budget adjustments have been made in
the past three years.
The State's severe financial difficulties for the current and upcoming
budget years will result in continued pressure upon various local governments,
particularly school districts and counties which depend on State aid. Despite
efforts in recent years to increase taxes and reduce governmental
expenditures, there can be no assurance that the State will not face budget
gaps in the future.
State general obligation bonds are currently rated "A1" by Moody's and
"A" by S&P. These ratings were recently reduced from "Aa" and "A+" levels.
There can be no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the future.
It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local
California issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations
issued by the State of California, and that there is no obligation on the part
of the State to make payment on such local obligations in the event of
default.
The State is involved in certain legal proceedings (described in the
State's recent financial statements) that, if decided against the State, may
require the State to make significant future expenditures or may substantially
impair revenues.
Property tax revenues received by local governments declined more than
50% following passage of Proposition 13. Subsequently, the California
Legislature enacted measures to provide for the redistribution of the State's
General Fund surplus to local agencies, the reallocation of certain State
revenues to local agencies and the assumption of certain governmental
functions by the State to assist municipal issuers to raise revenues. Total
local assistance from the State's General Fund was budgeted at approximately
75% of General Fund expenditures in recent years, including the effect of
implementing reductions in certain aid programs. To reduce State General Fund
support for school districts, the 1992-93 and 1993-94 Budget Acts caused local
governments to transfer $3.9 billion of property tax revenues to school
districts, representing loss of the post-Proposition 13 "bailout" aid. Local
governments have in return received greater revenues and greater flexibility
to operate health and welfare programs. To the extent the State should be
constrained by its Article XIIIB appropriations limit, or its obligation to
conform to Proposition 98, or other fiscal considerations, the absolute level,
or the rate of growth, of State assistance to local governments may be
reduced. Any such reductions in State aid could compound the serious fiscal
constraints already experienced by many local governments, particularly
counties. The Richmond Unified School District (Contra Costa County) entered
bankruptcy proceedings in May 1991, but the proceedings have been dismissed.
California Municipal Obligations which are assessment bonds may be
adversely affected by a general decline in real estate values or a slowdown in
real estate sales activity. In many cases, such bonds are secured by land
which is undeveloped at the time of issuance but anticipated to be developed
within a few years after issuance. In the event of such reduction or slowdown,
such development may not occur or may be delayed, thereby increasing the risk
of a default on the bonds. Because the special assessments or taxes securing
these bonds are not the personal liability of
<PAGE>
California IM-IT-- Series 131 37
the owners of the property assessed, the lien on the property is the only
security for the bonds. Moreover, in most cases the issuer of these bonds is
not required to make payments on the bonds in the event of delinquency in the
payment of assessments or taxes, except from amounts, if any, in a reserve
fund established for the bonds.
Certain California long-term lease obligations, though typically payable
from the general fund of the municipality, are subject to "abatement" in the
event the facility being leased is unavailable for beneficial use and
occupancy by the municipality during the term of the lease. Abatement is not a
default, and there may be no remedies available to the holders of the
certificates evidencing the lease obligation in the event abatement occurs.
The most common cases of abatement are failure to complete construction of the
facility before the end of the period during which lease payments have been
capitalized and uninsured casualty losses to the facility (e.g., due to
earthquake). In the event abatement occurs with respect to a lease obligation,
lease payments may be interrupted (if all available insurance proceeds and
reserves are exhausted) and the certificates may not be paid when due.
Several years ago the Richmond Unified School District (the "District")
entered into a lease transaction in which certain existing properties of the
District were sold and leased back in order to obtain funds to cover operating
deficits. Following a fiscal crisis in which the District's finances were
taken over by a State receiver (including a brief period under bankruptcy
court protection), the District failed to make rental payments on this lease,
resulting in a lawsuit by the Trustee for the Certificate of Participation
holders, in which the State was a named defendant (on the grounds that it
controlled the District's finances). One of the defenses raised in answer to
this lawsuit was the invalidity of the original lease transaction. The trial
court has upheld the validity of the District's lease, and the case has been
settled. Any judgment in any future case against the position asserted by the
Trustee in the Richmond case may have adverse implications for lease
transactions of a similar nature by other California entities.
The repayment of industrial development securities secured by real
property may be affected by California laws limiting foreclosure rights of
creditors. Securities backed by health care and hospital revenues may be
affected by changes in State regulations governing cost reimbursements to
health care providers under Medi-Cal (the State's Medicaid program), including
risks related to the policy of awarding exclusive contracts to certain
hospitals.
Limitations on ad valorem property taxes may particularly affect "tax
allocation" bonds issued by California redevelopment agencies. Such bonds are
secured solely by the increase in assessed valuation of a redevelopment
project area after the start of redevelopment activity. In the event that
assessed values in the redevelopment project decline (e.g., because of a major
natural disaster such as an earthquake), the tax increment revenue may be
insufficient to make principal and interest payments on these bonds. Both
Moody's and S&P suspended ratings on California tax allocation bonds after the
enactment of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB, and only resumed such ratings on a
selective basis.
Proposition 87, approved by California voters in 1988, requires that all
revenues produced by a tax rate increase go directly to the taxing entity
which increased such tax rate to repay that entity's general obligation
indebtedness. As a result, redevelopment agencies (which, typically, are the
Issuers of tax allocation securities) no longer receive an increase in tax
increment when taxes on property in the project area are increased to repay
voter-approved bonded indebtedness.
The effect of these various constitutional and statutory changes upon the
ability of California municipal securities issuers to pay interest and
principal on their obligations remains unclear. Furthermore, other measures
affecting the taxing or spending authority of California or its political
subdivisions may be approved or enacted in the future. Legislation has been or
may be introduced which would modify existing taxes or other revenue-raising
measures or which either would further limit or, alternatively, would increase
the abilities of state and local governments to impose new taxes or increase
existing taxes. It is not presently possible to determine the impact of any
such legislation on California Municipal Obligations in which the Fund may
invest, future allocations of state revenues to local governments or the
abilities of state or local governments to pay the interest on, or repay the
principal of, such California Municipal Obligations.
Substantially all of California is within an active geologic region
subject to major seismic activity. Any California Municipal Obligation in the
Portfolio could be affected by an interruption of revenues because of damaged
facilities,
<PAGE>
38 California IM-IT-- Series 131
or, consequently, income tax deductions for casualty losses or property tax
assessment reductions. Compensatory financial assistance could be constrained
by the inability of (i) an issuer to have obtained earthquake insurance
coverage at reasonable rates; (ii) an insurer to perform on its contracts of
insurance in the event of widespread losses; or (iii) the Federal or State
government to appropriate sufficient funds within their respective budget
limitations.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on California IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, special counsel to the
Fund for California tax matters, under existing California income and property
tax law applicable to individuals who are California residents:
(1) the California IM-IT Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation and the income of the California
IM-IT Trust will be treated as the income of the Unitholders under the
income tax laws of California;
(2) amounts treated as interest on the underlying Securities in the
California IM-IT Trust which are exempt from tax under California
personal income tax and property tax laws when received by the
California IM-IT Trust will, under such laws, retain their status as
tax-exempt interest when distributed to Unitholders. However, interest
on the underlying Securities attributed to a Unitholder which is a
corporation subject to the California franchise tax laws may be
includable in its gross income for purposes of determining its
California franchise tax. Further, certain interest which is
attributable to a Unitholder subject to the California personal income
tax and which is treated as an item of tax preference for purposes of
the federal alternative minimum tax pursuant to Section 57(a)(5) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 may also be treated as an item of
tax preference that must be taken into account in computing such
Unitholder's alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of the
California alternative minimum tax enacted by 1987 California
Statutes, chapter 1138. However, because of the provisions of the
California Constitution exempting the interest on bonds issued by the
State of California, or by local governments within the state, from
taxes levied on income, the application of the new California
alternative minimum tax to interest otherwise exempt from the
California personal income tax in some cases may be unclear;
(3) under California income tax law, each Unitholder in the California
IM-IT Trust will have a taxable event when the California IM-IT Trust
disposes of a Security (whether by sale, exchange, redemption, or
payment at maturity) or when the Unitholder redeems or sells Units.
Because of the requirement that tax cost basis be reduced to reflect
amortization of bond premium, under some circumstances a Unitholder
may realize taxable gains when Units are sold or redeemed for an
amount equal to, or less than, their original cost. The total cost of
each Unit in the California IM-IT Trust to a Unitholder is allocated
among each of the Bond issues held in the California IM-IT Trust (in
accordance with the proportion of the California IM-IT Trust comprised
by each Bond issue) in order to determine his per Unit tax cost for
each Bond issue; and the tax cost reduction requirements relating to
amortization of bond premium will apply separately to the per Unit tax
cost of each Bond issue. Unitholders' bases in their units, and the
bases for their fractional interest in each Trust asset, may have to
be adjusted for their pro rata share of accrued interest received, if
any, on Securities delivered after the Unitholders' respective
settlement dates;
(4) under the California personal property tax laws, bonds (including
the Securities in the California IM-IT Trust) or any interest therein
is exempt from such tax;
(5) any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the
California IM-IT Trust with respect to the Securities which represent
maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by theTrustee will be
exempt from California personal income tax if, and to the same extent
as, such interest would have been so exempt if paid by the issuer of
the defaulted obligations; and
(6) under Section 17280(b)(2) of the California Revenue and Taxation
Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or
carry Units of the California IM-IT Trust is not deductible for the
purposes of the California personal income tax. While there presently
is no California authority interpreting this provision, Section
17280(b)(2) directs the California Franchise Tax Board to prescribe
regulations determining the proper allocation and apportionment of
interest costs for this purpose. The Franchise Tax
<PAGE>
California IM-IT-- Series 131 39
Board has not yet proposed or prescribed such regulations. In
interpreting the generally similar Federal provision, the Internal
Revenue Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need not
be directly traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units (although
the Service has not contended that a deduction for interest on
indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve a personal residence or
to purchase goods or services for personal consumption will be
disallowed). In the absence of conflicting regulations or other
California authority, the California Franchise Tax Board generally has
interpreted California statutory tax provisions in accord with
Internal Revenue Service interpretations of similar Federal
provisions.
At the respective times of issuance of the Securities, opinions relating
to the validity thereof and to the exemption of interest thereon from Federal
income tax and California personal income tax are rendered by bond counsel to
the respective issuing authorities. Except in certain instances in which
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe acted as bond counsel to issuers of Securities,
and as such made a review of proceedings relating to the issuance of certain
Securities at the time of their issuance, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has
not made any special review for the California IM-IT Trust of the proceedings
relating to the issuance of the Securities or of the basis for such opinions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 58.63
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>............................................................. $ 2.05
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 56.58
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 56.58
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.72
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15718
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F2><F3><F4>........................................... 5.66%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F2><F3><F4>........................................................................ 5.74%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.87
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F4>.................................................................... $ 4.72
PURCHASED INTEREST <F5>........................................................................................ $ 7.52
Trustee's Annual Fee................... $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> Excluding insurance costs.
<F2> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F4> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F5> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
40 California IM-IT-- Series 131
<TABLE>
CALIFORNIA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 131 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND CALIFORNIA
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION IM-IT
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 250,000 M-S-R Public Power Agency (California) San Juan Refunding
Revenue Bonds, Series F (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2003 @ 102
#6.00% Due 7/1/2020.......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. $ 241,715
500,000 Castaic Lake Water Agency (California) Refunding Revenue
Certificates of Participation (Water System Improvement
Project) Series 1994A (MBIA Insured) 2004 @ 102
#6.30% Due 8/1/2020.......................................... YAAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 502,500
500,000 Santa Margarita/Dana Point Authority, Orange County,
California, Revenue Bonds, Series B (1994 Improvement
Districts Nos.3, 3A, 4 and 4A General Obligation Bond
Refinancing) MBIA Insured 2004 @ 102
#5.75% Due 8/1/2020.......................................... YAAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 466,385
230,000 City and County of San Francisco, Sewer Revenue Refunding
Bonds, Series 1994 (FGIC Insured) 2002 @ 102
#5.375% Due 10/1/2022........................................ AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 201,383
380,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
Certificates of Participation (Sutter Health Obligated Group)
MBIA Insured 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 8/15/2023......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 338,428
200,000 The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles,
California (Bunker Hill Redevelopment Project) Tax Allocation
Refunding Bonds, Series H (FSA Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.625% Due 12/1/2023........................................ AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 181,322
500,000 Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles,
California, Water Works Revenue Bonds, Issue of 1994 (MBIA
Insured) 2004 @ 102
#6.30% Due 7/1/2024.......................................... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 502,500
500,000 California Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser
Permanente) Semiannual Tender Revenue Bonds, 1985 Tender
Bonds (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
5.55% Due 8/15/2025.......................................... AAA 2002 @ 101 447,355
$ 3,060,000 $ 2,881,588
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
Florida IM-IT-- Series 83 41
FLORIDA IM-IT TRUST
GENERAL. The Florida IM-IT Trust consists of 9 issues of Securities. One
of the Bonds in the Florida IM-IT Trust is a general obligation of the
governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing power thereof. The
remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Florida IM-IT Trust) as follows: Health Care, 3 (21%); Public Building,
1 (17%); General Obligations, 1 (16%); Transportation, 1 (16%); Water and
Sewer, 1 (16%) and General Purpose, 2 (14%). No Bond issue has received a
provisional rating.
RISK FACTORS. Florida's economy has in the past been highly dependent on
the construction industry and construction related manufacturing. This
dependency has declined in recent years and continues to do so as a result of
continued diversification of the State's economy. For example, in 1980 total
contract construction employment as a share of total non-farm employment was
just over seven percent and in 1993 the share had edged downward to five
percent. This trend is expected to continue as Florida's economy continues to
diversify. Florida, nevertheless, has a dynamic construction industry with
single and multi-family housing starts accounting for 8.5% of total U.S.
housing starts in 1993 while the State's population is 5.3% of the U.S. total
population. Florida's housing starts since 1980 have represented an average of
11.0% of the U.S.'s total annual starts, and since 1980 total housing starts
have averaged 156,450 a year.
A driving force behind the State's construction industry has been the
State's rapid rate of population growth. Although Florida currently is the
fourth most populous state (with an estimated population of 13.4 million), its
annual population growth is now projected to decline as the number of people
moving into the State is expected to hover near the mid 250,000 range annually
throughout the 1990s. This population trend should provide fuel for business
and home builders to keep construction activity lively in Florida for some
time to come. However, other factors do influence the level of construction in
the State. For example, Federal tax reform in 1986 and other changes to the
Federal income tax code have eliminated tax deductions for owners of two or
more residential real estate properties and have lengthened depreciation
schedules on investment and commercial properties. Economic growth and
existing supplies of commercial buildings and homes also contribute to the
level of construction activity in the State.
Since 1980, the State's job creation rate is almost twice the rate for
the nation as a whole, and its growth rate in new non-agricultural jobs is the
fastest of the 11 most populous states and second only to California in the
absolute number of new jobs created. Contributing to the State's rapid rate of
growth in employment and income is international trade. Since 1980, the
State's unemployment rate has generally been below that of the U.S. In recent
years, however, as the State's economic growth has slowed from its previous
highs, the State's unemployment rate has tracked above the national average.
The average in Florida since 1980 has been 6.5% while the national average is
7.1%. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Florida Department of
Labor and Employment Security, and the Florida Consensus Economic Estimating
Conference (together the "Organization") the State's unemployment rate was
8.2% during 1992. As of January, 1994, the Organization estimates that the
unemployment rate will be 6.7% for 1993-94 and 6.1% in 1994-95.
The rate of job creation in Florida's manufacturing sector has exceeded
that of the U.S. From the beginning of 1980 through 1993, the State added over
50,100 new manufacturing jobs, an 11.7% increase. During the same period,
national manufacturing employment declined ten out of the fourteen years, for
a loss of 2,977,000 jobs.
Total non-farm employment in Florida is expected to increase 2.7% in
1993-94 and rise 3.8% in 1994-95. Trade and services, the two largest figures,
account for more than half of the total non-farm employment. Employment in the
service sectors should experience an increase of 3.9% in 1993-94, while
growing 4.9% in 1994-95. Trade is expected to expand 2.2% in 1994 and 3.4% in
1995. The service sector is now the State's largest employment category.
Tourism is one of Florida's most important industries. Approximately 40.9
million tourists visited the State in 1992, as reported by the Florida
Department of Commence. In terms of business activities and state tax
revenues, tourists in Florida in 1992 represented an estimated 4.5 million
additional residents. Visitors to the State tend to arrive equally by air and
car. The State's tourism industry over the years has become more
sophisticated, attracting visitors
<PAGE>
42 Florida IM-IT-- Series 83
year-round and, to a degree, reducing its seasonality. Tourist arrivals are
expected to decline by almost two percent this year, but recover next year
with 5.0% growth. By the end of the State's current fiscal year, 41.0 million
domestic and international tourists are expected to have visited the State. In
1994-95, tourist arrivals should approximate 43.0 million.
The State's per capita personal income in 1992 of $19,947 was slightly
below the national average of $19,841 and significantly ahead of that for the
southeast United States, which was $17,661. Real personal income in the State
is estimated to increase 5.5% in 1993-94 and 4.7% in 1994-95. By the end of
1994-95, real personal income per capita in the State is projected to average
6.7% higher than its 1992-93 level.
Compared to other states, Florida has a proportionately greater
retirement age population which comprises 18.3% (as of April 1, 1991) of the
State's population and is forecast to grow at an average annual rate of over
1.96% through the 1990s. Thus, property income (dividends, interest, and rent)
and transfer payments (Social Security and pension benefits, among other
sources of income) are a relatively more important source of income. For
example, Florida's total wages and salaries and other labor income in 1992 was
61% of total income, while a similar figure for the nation for 1992 was 72.0%.
Transfer payments are typically less sensitive to the business cycle than
employment income and, therefore, act as stabilizing forces in weak economic
periods. While many of the U.S.'s senior citizens choose the State as their
place of retirement, the State is also recognized as attracting a significant
number of working age people. Since 1982, the prime working age population
(18-44) has grown at an average annual rate of 3.3%.
In fiscal year 1991-92, approximately 64% of the State's total direct
revenue to its three operating funds was derived from State taxes, with
federal grants and other special revenue accounting for the balance. State
sales and use tax, corporate income tax, and beverage tax amounted to 68%, 7%
and 5%, respectively, of total receipts by the General Revenue Fund during
fiscal year 1991-92. In that same year, expenditures for education, health and
welfare, and public safety amounted to 53%, 30% and 13.3%, respectively, of
total expenditures from the General Revenue Fund.
Hurricane Andrew left some parts of south Florida devastated.
Post-Hurricane Andrew clean up and rebuilding have changed the outlook for the
State's economy. Single and multi-family housing starts in 1993-94 are
projected to reach a combined level of 118,000, and to increase to 134,300
next year. Lingering recessionary effects on consumers and tight credit are
two of the reasons for relatively slow core construction activity, as well as
lingering effects from the 1986 tax reform legislation discussed above.
However, construction is one of the sectors most severely affected by
Hurricane Andrew. Low interest rates and pent up demand combined with improved
consumer confidence should lead to improved housing starts. The construction
figures above include additional housing starts as a result of destruction by
Hurricane Andrew. Total construction expenditures are forecasted to increase
15.6% this year and increase 13.3% next year.
The State Constitution and statutes mandate that the State budget, as a
whole, and each separate fund within the State budget, be kept in balance from
currently available revenues each fiscal year. If the Governor or Comptroller
believes a deficit will occur in any State fund, by statute, he must certify
his opinion to the Administrative Commission, which then is authorized to
reduce all State agency budgets and releases by a suffficient amount to
prevent a deficit in any fund. Additionally, the State Constitution prohibits
issuance of State obligations to fund State operations.
Estimated fiscal year 1993-94 General Revenue plus Working Capital funds
available total $13,582.7 million, an 8.4% increase over 1992-93. This
reflects a transfer of $190 million, out of an estimated $220.0 million in
non-recurring revenue due to Andrew, to a hurricane relief trust fund. Of the
total General Revenue plus Working Capital funds available to the State,
$12,943.5 million of that is Estimated Revenues (excluding the Andrew impact)
which represents an increase of 7.3% over the previous year's Estimated
Revenues. With effective General Revenues plus Working Capital Fund
appropriations at $13,276.9 million, unencumbered reserves at the end of
1993-94 are estimated at $305.8 million. Estimated, fiscal year 1994-95
General Revenue plus Working Capital funds available total $14,293.5 million,
a 5.2% increase over 1993-94. This amount reflects a transfer of $159.00
million in non-recurring revenue due to Hurricane Andrew, to a hurricane
relief trust fund. The $13,877.2 million in Estimated Revenues (excluding the
Hurricane Andrew impact) represent an increase of 7.2% over the previous
year's Estimated Revenues. The massive effort to rebuild and replace destroyed
or damaged property in the wake of Andrew
<PAGE>
Florida IM-IT-- Series 83 43
is responsible for the substantial positive revenue impacts shown here. Most
of the impact is in the increase in the State's sales tax.
In fiscal year 1992-93, approximately 62% of the State's total direct
revenue to its three operating funds were derived from State taxes, with
Federal grants and other special revenue accounting for the balance. State
sales and use tax, corporate income tax, intangible personal property tax, and
beverage tax amounted to 68%, 7%, 4%, and 4%, respectively, of total General
Revenue Funds available during fiscal 1992-93. In that same year, expenditures
for education, health and welfare, and public safety amounted to approximately
49%, 30%, and 11%, respectively, of total expenditures from the General
Revenue Fund.
The State's sales and use tax (6%) currently accounts for the State's
single largest source of tax receipts. Slightly less than 10% of the State's
sales and use tax is designated for local governments and is distributed to
the respective counties in which collected for such use by such counties and
the municipalities therein. In addition to this distribution, local
governments may (by referendum) assess a 0.5% or a 1.0% discretionary sales
tax within their county. Proceeds from this local option sales tax are
earmarked for funding local infrastructure programs and acquiring land for
public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources as
provided under Florida law. Certain charter counties have other taxing powers
in addition, and non-consolidated counties with a population in excess of
800,000 may levy a local option sales tax to fund indigent health care. It
alone cannot exceed 0.5% and when combined with the infrastructure surtax
cannot exceed 1.0%. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 1993, sales and use tax
receipts (exclusive of the tax on gasoline and special fuels) totalled
$9,426.0 million, an increase of 12.5% over fiscal year 1991-92.
The second largest source of State tax receipts is the tax on motor
fuels. However, these revenues are almost entirely dedicated trust funds for
specific purposes and are not included in the State's General Revenue Fund.
The State imposes an alcoholic beverage wholesale tax (excise tax) on
beer, wine, and liquor. This tax is one of the State's major tax sources, with
revenues totalling $442.2 million in fiscal year ending June 30, 1993.
Alcoholic beverage tax receipts declined 1.6% over the previous year. The
revenues collected from this tax are deposited into the State's General
Revenue Fund.
The State imposes a corporate income tax. All receipts of the corporate
income tax are credited to the General Revenue Fund. For the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1993, receipts from this source were $846.6 million, an increase of
5.6% from fiscal year 1991-92.
The State imposes a documentary stamp tax on deeds and other documents
relating to realty, corporate shares, bonds, certificates of indebtedness,
promissory notes, wage assignments, and retail charge accounts. The
documentary stamp tax collections totaled $639.0 million during fiscal year
1992-93, a 27.0% increase from the previous fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal
year 1992-93, 71.29% of these taxes are to be deposited to the General Revenue
Fund.
The State imposes a gross receipts tax on electric, natural gas, and
telecommunications services. All gross receipts utilities tax collections are
credited to the State's Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust
Fund. In fiscal year 1992-93, this amounted to $447.9 million.
The State imposes an intangible personal property tax on stocks, bonds,
including bonds secured by liens in Florida real property, notes, governmental
leaseholds, and certain other intangibles not secured by a lien on Florida
real property. The annual rate of tax is 2 mils. Second, the State imposes a
non-recurring 2 mil tax on mortgages and other obligations secured by liens on
Florida real property. In fiscal year 1992-93, total intangible personal
property tax collections were $783.4 million, a 33% increase over the prior
year. Of the tax proceeds, 66.5% are distributed to the General Revenue Fund.
The State began its own lottery in 1988. State law requires that lottery
revenues be distributed 50% to the public in prizes, 38% for use in enhancing
education, and the balance, 12.0% for costs of administering the lottery.
Fiscal year 1992-93 lottery ticket sales totalled $2.13 billion, providing
education with $810.4 million.
<PAGE>
44 Florida IM-IT-- Series 83
The State's severance tax applies to oil, gas, and sulphur production, as
well as the severance of phosphate rock and other solid minerals. Total
collections from severance taxes total $64.5 million during fiscal year
1992-93, down 4.0% from the previous year. Currently, 60.0% of this amount is
transferred to the General Revenue Fund.
The State has continuously been dependent on the highly cyclical
construction and construction related manufacturing industries. While that
dependency has decreased, the State is still somewhat at the mercy of the
construction and construction related manufacturing industries. The
construction industry is driven to a great extent by the State's rapid growth
in population. There can be no assurance that population growth will in fact
continue throughout the 1990's in which case there could be an adverse impact
on the State's economy through the loss of construction and construction
related manufacturing jobs. Also, while interest rates remain low currently,
an increase in interest rates could significantly adversely impact the
financing of new construction within the State, thereby adversely impacting
unemployment and other economic factors within the State. In addition,
available commercial office space has tended to remain high over the past few
years. So long as this glut of commercial rental space continues, construction
of this type of space will likely continue to remain slow.
At the end of fiscal 1993, approximately $5.61 billion in principal
amount of debt secured by the full faith and credit of the State was
outstanding. In addition, since July 1, 1993, the State issued about $873.0
million in principal amount of full faith and credit bonds.
The State Constitution and statutes mandate that the State budget, as a
whole, and each separate fund within the State budget, be kept in balance from
currently available revenues each fiscal year. If the Governor or Comptroller
believe a deficit will occur in any State fund, by statute, he must certify
his opinion to the Administrative Commission, which then is authorized to
reduce all State agency budgets and releases by a sufficient amount to prevent
a deficit in any fund. Additionally, the State Constitution prohibits issuance
of State obligations to fund State operations.
Currently under litigation are several issues relating to State actions
or State taxes that put at risk substantial amounts of General Revenue Fund
monies. Accordingly, there is no assurance that any of such matters,
individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse affect on
Florida's financial position.
Florida law provides preferential tax treatment to insurers who maintain
a home office in the State. Certain insurers challenged the constitutionality
of this tax preference and sought a refund of taxes paid. Recently, the State
Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State. This case and others, along with
pending refund claims, total about $150 million.
Florida maintains a bond rating of Aa and AA from Moody's Investors
Service and Standard & Poor's Corporation, respectively, on the majority of
its general obligation bonds, although the rating of a particular series of
revenue bonds relates primarily to the project, facility, or other revenue
sources from which such series derives funds for repayment. While these
ratings and some of the information presented above indicate that Florida is
in satisfactory economic health, there can be no assurance that there will not
be a decline in economic conditions or that particular Municipal Obligations
purchased by the Fund will not be adversely affected by any such changes.
The sources for the information presented above include official
statements and financial statements of the State of Florida. While the Sponsor
has not independently verified this information, the Sponsor has no reason to
believe that the information is not correct in all material respects.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on Florida IM-IT Trust units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
The Bonds were accompanied by opinions of Bond Counsel to the respective
issuers thereof to the effect that the Bonds were exempt from the Florida
intangibles tax. Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently
reviewed such opinions or examined the Bonds to be deposited in and held by
the Florida IM-IT Trust and have assumed the correctness as of the date of
deposit of the opinions of Bond Counsel.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, counsel to the Sponsor, under
existing law:
<PAGE>
Florida IM-IT-- Series 83 45
For Florida state income tax purposes, the Florida IM-IT Trust will
not be subject to the Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida
Statutes. In addition, Florida does not impose any income taxes at the
local level.
Because Florida does not impose an income tax on individuals,
non-corporate Unitholders residing in Florida will not be subject to any
Florida income taxation on income realized by the Florida IM-IT Trust.
Any amounts paid to the Florida IM-IT Trust or to non-corporate
Unitholders residing in Florida under an insurance policy issued to the
Florida IM-IT Trust or the Sponsor which represent maturing interest on
defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will not be subject to the
Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida Statutes.
Corporate Unitholders with commercial domiciles in Florida will be
subject to Florida income or franchise taxation on income realized by
the Florida IM-IT Trust and on payments of interest pursuant to any
insurance policy. Other corporate Unitholders will be subject to Florida
income or franchise taxation on income realized by the Florida IM-IT
Trust (or on payments of interest pursuant to any insurance policy) only
to the extent that the income realized does not constitute "non-business
income" as defined by Chapter 220.
Units will be subject to Florida estate tax only if held by Florida
residents. However, the Florida estate tax is limited to the amount of
the credit for state death taxes provided for in Section 2011 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Neither the Bonds nor the Units will be subject to the Florida ad
valorem property tax, the Florida intangibles personal property tax or
Florida sales or use tax.
<PAGE>
46 Florida IM-IT-- Series 83
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 57.63
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>............................................................. $ 2.01
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.62
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.62
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.64
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15449
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F2><F3><F4>........................................... 5.56%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F2><F3><F4>........................................................................ 5.64%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.79
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F4>.................................................................... $ 4.64
PURCHASED INTEREST <F5>........................................................................................ $ 9.60
Trustee's Annual Fee................... $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> Excluding insurance costs.
<F2> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F4> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F5> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Florida IM-IT-- Series 83 47
<TABLE>
FLORIDA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 83 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND FLORIDA
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION IM-IT
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 185,000 Miami Beach Health Facilities Authority (Florida) Hospital
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Mount Sinai Medical Center Project)
Series 1992 (Capital Guaranty Insured) 2002 @ 102
#6.25% Due 11/15/2019........................................ AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. $ 185,463
500,000 Miami (Florida) Sports and Exhibition Authority, Special
Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A (FGIC Insured) 2002 @ 102
6.15% Due 10/1/2020.......................................... AAA 2010 @ 100 S.F. 499,270
500,000 State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Turnpike
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 101
#5.25% Due 7/1/2022.......................................... AAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 435,375
500,000 City of Sebring, Florida, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds,
Series 1993 (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 1/1/2023.......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 452,940
350,000 Dade County, Florida, Public Facilities Authority, Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Jackson Memorial Hospital) Series 1993 (MBIA
Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.25% Due 6/1/2023.......................................... AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 301,129
100,000 Tampa, Florida, Revenue Bonds, Allegany Health System (St.
Joseph) Series 1993 (MBIA Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.125% Due 12/1/2023........................................ AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 83,837
290,000 Hernando County, Florida, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds,
Series 1994 (MBIA Insured) 2003 @ 102
#6.00% Due 2/1/2024.......................................... YAAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 283,629
500,000 Florida State Board of Education, Capital Outlay Public
Education General Obligation Bonds, Series A (MBIA Insured) 2004 @ 101
#6.10% Due 6/1/2024.......................................... YAAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 495,685
125,000 Jacksonville, Florida, Capital Improvement Revenue Certificates
(Gator Bowl Project) AMBAC Indemnity Insured 2004 @ 101
6.00% Due 10/1/2025.......................................... YAAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 122,188
$ 3,050,000 $ 2,859,516
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
48 Michigan IM-IT-- Series 119
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST
GENERAL. The Michigan IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities.
Four of the Bonds in the Michigan IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Michigan IM-IT Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 4 (35%); Higher
Education, 1 (17%); General Purpose, 1 (16%); Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue, 1
(16%) and Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (16%). No Bond issue has received a
provisional rating.
RISK FACTORS. Investors should be aware that the economy of the State of
Michigan has, in the past, proven to be cyclical, due primarily to the fact
that the leading sector of the State's economy is the manufacturing of durable
goods. While the State's efforts to diversify its economy have proven
successful, as reflected by the fact that the share of employment in the State
in the durable goods sector has fallen from 33.1 percent in 1960 to 17.9
percent in 1990, durable goods manufacturing still represents a sizable
portion of the State's economy. As a result, any substantial national economic
downturn is likely to have an adverse effect on the economy of the State and
on the revenues of the State and some of its local governmental units.
In May 1986, Moody's Investors Service raised the State's general
obligation bond rating to "A1". In October 1989, Standard & Poor's Corporation
raised its rating on the State's general obligation bonds to "AA".
The State's economy could continue to be affected by changes in the auto
industry, notably consolidation and plant closings resulting from competitive
pressures and over-capacity. Such actions could adversely affect State
revenues and the financial impact on the local units of government in the
areas in which plants are closed could be more severe.
General Motors Corporation has announced the scheduled closing of several
of its plants in Michigan in 1993 and 1994. The impact these closures will
have on the State's revenues and expenditures is not currently known. The
impact on the financial condition of the municipalities in which the plants
are located may be more severe than the impact on the State itself.
In recent years, the State has reported its financial results in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For each of the five
fiscal years ending with the fiscal year ended September 30, 1989, the State
reported positive year-end General Fund balances and positive cash balances in
the combined General Fund/School Aid Fund. For the fiscal years ending
September 30, 1990 and 1991, the State reported negative year-end General Fund
Balances of $310.4 million and $169.4 million, respectively, but ended the
1992 fiscal year with its general fund in balance and ended the 1993 fiscal
year with a small general fund surplus. A positive cash balance in the
combined General Fund/School Aid Fund was recorded at September 30, 1990. In
the 1991 thru 1993 fiscal years the State experienced deteriorating cash
balances which necessitated short term borrowing and the deferral of certain
scheduled cash payments. The State borrowed $900 million for cash flow
purposes in the 1993 fiscal year, which was repaid on September 30, 1993. The
State's Budget Stabilization Fund received a $283 million transfer from the
General Fund in the 1993 State fiscal year, bringing the fund balance to $303
million at September 30, 1993.
The Michigan Constitution of 1963 limits the amount of total revenues of
the State raised from taxes and certain other sources to a level for each
fiscal year equal to a percentage of the State's personal income for the prior
calendar year. In the event that the State's total revenues exceeds the limit
by 1 percent or more, the Michigan Constitution of 1963 requires that the
excess be refunded to taxpayers.
On March 15, 1994, Michigan voters approved a school finance reform
amendment to the State's Constitution which, among other things, increases the
State sales tax rate from 4% to 6% and places a cap on property assessment
increases for all property taxes. Such approval triggers the effectiveness of
legislation under which the State's income tax rate will be cut from 4.6% to
4.4%, some property taxes will be reduced and school funding will be provided
from a combination of property taxes and state revenues, some of which will be
provided from other new or increased State taxes. The legislation also
contains other proposals that may reduce or alter the revenues of local units
of government, and tax increment bonds could be particularly affected. While
the ultimate impact of the
<PAGE>
Michigan IM-IT-- Series 119 49
constitutional amendment and related legislation cannot yet be accurately
predicted, investors should be alert to the potential effect of such measures
upon the operations and revenues of Michigan local units of government.
Although all or most of the Bonds in the Michigan IM-IT Trust are revenue
obligations or general obligations of local governments or authorities rather
than general obligations of the State of Michigan itself, there can be no
assurance that any financial difficulties the State may experience will not
adversely affect the market value or marketability of the Bonds or the ability
of the respective obligors to pay interest on or principal of the Bonds,
particularly in view of the dependency of local governments and other
authorities upon State aid and reimbursement programs and, in the case of
bonds issued by the State Building Authority, the dependency of the State
Building Authority on the receipt of rental payments from the State to meet
debt service requirements upon such bonds. In the 1991 fiscal year, the State
deferred certain scheduled cash payments to municipalities, school districts,
universities and community colleges. While such deferrals were made up at
specified later dates, similar future deferrals could have an adverse impact
on the cash position of some local governmental units. Additionally, the State
reduced revenue sharing payments to municipalities below that level provided
under formulas by $10.9 million in the 1991 fiscal year, up $34.4 million in
the 1992 fiscal year, $45.5 million in the 1993 fiscal year and $64.6 million
(budgeted) in the 1994 fiscal year.
The Michigan IM-IT Trust may contain general obligation bonds of local
units of government pledging the full faith and credit of the local unit which
are payable from the levy of ad valorem taxes on taxable property within the
jurisdiction of the local unit. Such bonds issued prior to December 22, 1978,
or issued after December 22, 1978 with the approval of the electors of the
local unit, are payable from property taxes levied without limitation as to
rate or amount. With respect to bonds issued after December 22, 1978, and
which were not approved by the electors of the local unit, the tax levy of the
local unit for debt service purposes is subject to constitutional, statutory
and charter tax rate limitations. In addition, several major industrial
corporations have instituted challenges of their ad valorem property tax
assessments in a number of local municipal units in the State. If successful,
such challenges could have an adverse impact on the ad valorem tax bases of
such units which could adversely affect their abiltiy to raise funds for
operation and debt service requirements.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on Michigan IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, special counsel to
the Fund for Michigan tax matters, under existing Michigan law:
The Michigan IM-IT Trust and the owners of Units will be treated for
purposes of the Michigan income tax laws and the Single Business Tax in
substantially the same manner as they are for purposes of the Federal income
tax laws, as currently enacted. Accordingly, we have relied upon the opinion
of Messrs. Chapman and Cutler as to the applicability of Federal income tax
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to the Michigan IM-IT Trust and the
Holders of Units.
Under the income tax laws of the State of Michigan, the Michigan IM-IT
Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation; the income of the
Michigan IM-IT Trust will be treated as the income of the Unitholders and be
deemed to have been received by them when received by the Michigan IM-IT
Trust. Interest on the underlying Bonds which is exempt from tax under these
laws when received by Michigan IM-IT Trust will retain its status as tax
exempt interest to the Unitholders.
For purposes of the foregoing Michigan tax laws, each Unitholder will be
considered to have received his pro rata share of Bond interest when it is
received by the Michigan IM-IT Trust, and each Unitholder will have a taxable
event when the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes of a Bond (whether by sale,
exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or when the Unitholder redeems or
sells his Certificate to the extent the transaction constitutes a taxable
event for Federal income tax purposes. The tax cost of each unit to a
Unitholder will be established and allocated for purposes of these Michigan
tax laws in the same manner as such cost is established and allocated for
Federal income tax purposes.
<PAGE>
50 Michigan IM-IT-- Series 119
Under the Michigan Intangibles Tax, the Michigan IM-IT Trust is not
taxable and the pro rata ownership of the underlying Bonds, as well as the
interest thereon, will be exempt to the Unitholders to the extent the Michigan
IM-IT Trust consists of obligations of the State of Michigan or its political
subdivisions or municipalities, or of obligations of possessions of the United
States.
The Michigan Single Business Tax replaced the tax on corporate and
financial institution income under the Michigan Income Tax, and the Intangible
Tax with respect to those intangibles of persons subject to the Single
Business Tax the income from which would be considered in computing the Single
Business Tax. Persons are subject to the Single Business Tax only if they are
engaged in "business activity", as defined in the Act. Under the Single
Business Tax, both interest received by the Michigan IM-IT Trust on the
underlying Bonds and any amount distributed from the Michigan IM-IT Trust to a
Unitholder, if not included in determining taxable income for Federal income
tax purposes, is also not included in the adjusted tax base upon which the
Single Business Tax is computed, of either the Michigan IM-IT Trust or the
Unitholders. If the Michigan IM-IT Trust or the Unitholders have a taxable
event for Federal income tax purposes when the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes
of a Bond (whether by sale, exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or
the Unitholder redeems or sells his Certificate, an amount equal to any gain
realized from such taxable event which was included in the computation of
taxable income for Federal income tax purposes (plus an amount equal to any
capital gain of an individual realized in connection with such event but
excluded in computing that individual's Federal taxable income) will be
included in the tax base against which, after allocation, apportionment and
other adjustments, the Single Business Tax is computed. The tax base will be
reduced by an amount equal to any capital loss realized from such a taxable
event, whether or not the capital loss was deducted in computing Federal
taxable income in the year the loss occurred. Unitholders should consult their
tax advisor as to their status under Michigan law.
Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy issued to the Trustee of the
Trust, or paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of Bonds, which,
when received by the Unitholders, represent maturing interest on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee, will be excludable from the Michigan income
tax laws and the Single Business Tax if, and to the same extent as, such
interest would have been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted
obligations. While treatment under the Michigan Intangibles Tax is not
premised upon the characterization of such proceeds under the Internal Revenue
Code, the Michigan Department of Treasury should adopt the same approach as
under the Michigan income tax laws and the Single Business Tax.
As the Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminates the capital gain deduction for
tax years beginning after December 31, 1986, the federal adjusted gross
income, the computation base for the Michigan Income Tax, of a Unitholder will
be increased accordingly to the extent such capital gains are realized when
the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes of a Bond or when the Unitholder redeems or
sells a Unit, to the extent such transaction constitutes a taxable event for
Federal income tax purposes.
<PAGE>
Michigan IM-IT-- Series 119 51
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 57.72
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>............................................................. $ 2.09
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.63
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.63
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.64
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15453
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F2><F3><F4>........................................... 5.56%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F2><F3><F4>........................................................................ 5.68%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.79
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F4>.................................................................... $ 4.64
PURCHASED INTEREST <F5>........................................................................................ $ 9.62
Trustee's Annual Fee................... $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> Excluding insurance costs.
<F2> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F4> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F5> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
52 Michigan IM-IT-- Series 119
<TABLE>
MICHIGAN INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 119 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND MICHIGAN
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION IM-IT
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 100,000 South Haven Public Schools, Counties of Allegan and Van Buren,
State of Michigan, 1993 Refunding Bonds (General
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) FGIC Insured 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 5/1/2017.......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. $ 90,904
500,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Limited
Obligation Revenue Refunding Bonds (Mercy Bellbrook Project)
Series 1993 (MBIA Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.375% Due 4/1/2018......................................... AAA 2011 @ 100 S.F. 446,050
405,000 Huron Valley School District, Counties of Oakland and
Livingston, State of Michigan, 1993 Refunding Bonds (General
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) FGIC Insured 2003 @ 102
#6.125% Due 5/1/2020......................................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 400,549
500,000 State of Michigan, State Trunk Line Fund Revenue Bonds, Series
1992A (FGIC Insured) 2002 @ 100
#5.50% Due 10/1/2021......................................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 450,805
500,000 School District of the City of River Rouge, County of Wayne,
State of Michigan (General Obligation-Unlimited Tax) 1993
School Building and Site Bonds (FSA Insured) 2003 @ 101.5
#5.625% Due 5/1/2022......................................... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 455,485
100,000 Wyoming Public Schools, County of Kent, State of Michigan, 1993
School Building and Site and Refunding Bonds (General
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) MBIA Insured 2003 @ 102
#5.90% Due 5/1/2022.......................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 95,909
540,000 Board of Trustees of Michigan State University (Michigan)
General Revenue Bonds, Series 1992A (MBIA Insured) 2002 @ 100
#5.50% Due 8/15/2022......................................... AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 489,478
500,000 The Economic Development Corporation of the County of St.
Clair, State of Michigan, Pollution Control Refunding Revenue
Bonds (Detroit Edison Company Project) Series 1992-DD (AMBAC
Indemnity Insured)
6.05% Due 8/1/2024........................................... AAA 2002 @ 102 485,860
$ 3,145,000 $ 2,915,040
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT-- Series 121 53
NEW YORK IM-IT TRUST
GENERAL. The New York IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities.
Two of the Bonds in the New York IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total New York IM-IT Trust) as follows: Transportation, 2 (33%); Industrial
Revenue, 1 (17%); Other Care, 1 (17%); Water and Sewer, 1 (16%); General
Obligations, 2 (10%) and Higher Education, 1 (7%). No Bond issue has received
a provisional rating.
RISK FACTORS. A resident of New York State (or New York City) will be
subject to New York State (or New York City) personal income tax with respect
to gains realized when New York Obligations held in the New York Insured Trust
are sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when his Units are sold or redeemed,
such gain will equal the proceeds of sale, redemption or payment less the tax
basis of the New York Obligation or Unit (adjusted to reflect (a) the
amortization of premium or discount, if any, on New York Obligations held in
the Trust, (b) accrued original issue discount, with respect to each New York
Obligation which, at the time the New York Obligation was issued had original
issue discount, and (c) the deposit of New York Obligations with accrued
interest in the Trust after the Unitholder's settlement date).
Interest or gain from the New York Insured Trust derived by a Unitholder
who is not a resident of New York State (or New York City) will not be subject
to New York State (or New York City) personal income tax, unless the Units are
property employed in a business, trade, profession or occupation carried on in
New York State (or New York City).
Amounts paid on defaulted New York Obligations held by the Trustee under
policies of insurance issued with respect to such New York Obligations will be
excludable from income for New York State and New York City income tax
purposes, if and to the same extent as, such interest would have been
excludable if paid by the respective issuer.
For purposes of the New York State and New York City franchise tax on
corporations, Unitholders which are subject to such tax will be required to
include in their entire net income any interest or gains distributed to them
even though distributed in respect of New York obligations.
If borrowed funds are used to purchase Units in the Trust, all (or part)
of the interest on such indebtedness will not be deductible for New York State
and New York City tax purposes. The purchase of Units may be considered to
have been made with borrowed funds even though such funds are not directly
traceable to the purchase of Units in any New York Trust.
The Portfolio of the New York IM-IT Trust includes obligations issued by
New York State (the "State"), by its various public bodies (the "Agencies"),
and/or by other entities located within the State, including the City of New
York (the "City").
Some of the more significant events relating to the financial situation
in New York are summarized below. This section provides only a brief summary
of the complex factors affecting the financial situation in New York and is
based in part on Official Statements issued by, and on other information
reported by the State, the City and the Agencies in connection with the
issuance of their respective securities.
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local government finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of New York Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Trust or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
The State has historically been one of the wealthiest states in the
nation. For decades, however, the State economy has grown more slowly than
that of the nation as a whole, gradually eroding the State's relative economic
affluence. Statewide, urban centers have experienced significant changes
involving migration of the more affluent to the suburbs and an influx of
generally less affluent residents. Regionally, the older Northeast cities have
suffered because of the relative success that the South and the West have had
in attracting people and business. The City has also had to face greater
competition as other major cities have developed financial and business
capabilities which make them less dependent on the specialized services
traditionally available almost exclusively in the City.
<PAGE>
54 New York IM-IT-- Series 121
The State has for many years had a very high state and local tax burden
relative to other states. The burden of State and local taxation, in
combination with the many other causes of regional economic dislocation, has
contributed to the decisions of some businesses and individuals to relocate
outside, or not locate within, the State.
A national recession commenced in mid-1990. The downturn continued
throughout the State's 1990-91 fiscal year and was followed by a period of
weak economic growth during the 1991 calendar year. For calendar year 1992,
the national economy continued to recover, although at a rate below all
post-war recoveries. For calendar year 1993, the economy is expected to grow
faster than 1992, but still at a very moderate rate, as compared to other
recoveries. The national recession has been more severe in the State because
of factors such as a significant retrenchment in the financial services
industry, cutbacks in defense spending, and an overbuilt real estate market.
1993-94 Fiscal Year. On April 5, 1993, the State Legislature approved a
$32.08 billion budget. Following enactment of the budget the 1993-94 State
Financial Plan was formulated on April 16, 1993. This Plan projects General
Fund receipts and transfers from other funds at $32.367 billion and
disbursements and transfers to other funds at $32.300 billion. In comparison
to the Governor's recommended Executive Budget for the 1993-94 fiscal year, as
revised on February 18, 1993, the 1993-94 State Financial Plan reflects
increases in both receipts and disbursements in the General Fund of $811
million.
While a portion of the increased receipts was the result of a $487
million increase in the State's 1992-93 positive year-end margin at March 31,
1993 to $671 million, the balance of such increased receipts is based upon (i)
a projected $269 million increase in receipts resulting from improved 1992-93
results and the expectation of an improving economy, (ii) projected additional
payments of $200 million from the Federal government as reimbursements for
indigent medical care, (iii) the early payment of $50 million of personal tax
returns in 1992-93 which otherwise would have been paid in 1993-94; offset by
(iv) the State Legislature's failure to enact $195 million of additional
revenue-raising recommendations proposed by the Governor. There can be no
assurances that all of the projected receipts referred to above will be
received.
Despite the $811 million increase in disbursements included in the
1993-94 State Financial Plan, a reduction in aid to some local government
units can be expected. To offset a portion of such reductions, the 1993-94
State Financial Plan contains a package of mandate relief, cost containment
and other proposals to reduce the costs of many programs for which local
governments provide funding. There can be no assurance, however, that
localities that suffer cuts will not be adversely affected, leading to further
requests for State financial assistance.
There can be no assurance that the State will not face substantial
potential budget gaps in the future resulting from a significant disparity
between tax revenues projected from a lower recurring receipts base and the
spending required to maintain State programs at current levels. To address any
potential budgetary imbalance, the State may need to take significant actions
to align recurring receipts and disbursements.
1992-93 Fiscal Year. Before giving effect to a 1992-93 year-end deposit
to the refund reserve account of $671 million, General Fund receipts in
1992-93 would have been $716 million higher than originally projected. This
year-end deposit effectively reduced 1992-93 receipts by $671 million and made
those receipts available for 1993-94.
The State's favorable performance primarily resulted from income tax
collections that were $700 million higher than projected which reflected both
stronger economic activity and tax-induced one-time acceleration of income
into 1992. In other areas larger than projected business tax collections and
unbudgeted receipts offset the loss of $200 million of anticipated Federal
reimbursement and losses of, or shortfalls in, other projected revenue
sources.
For 1992-93, disbursements and transfers to other funds (including the
deposit to the refund reserve account discussed above) totalled $30.829
billion, an increase of $45 million above projections in April 1992.
Fiscal year 1992-93 was the first time in four years that the State did
not incur a cash-basis operating deficit in the General Fund requiring the
issuance of deficit notes or other bonds, spending cuts or other revenue
raising measures.
Indebtedness. As of March 31, 1993, the total amount of long-term State
general obligation debt authorized but unissued stood at $2.4 billion. As of
the same date, the State had approximately $5.4 billion in general obligation
bonds. The State issued $850 million in tax and revenue anticipation notes
("TRANS") on April 28, 1993. The State does not project the need to issue
additional TRANS during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
The State projects that its borrrowings for capital purposes during the
State's 1993-94 fiscal year will consist of $460 million in general obligation
bonds and $140 million in new commercial paper issuances. In addition, the
State
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT-- Series 121 55
expects to issue $140 million in bonds for the purpose of redeeming
outstanding bond anticipation notes. The Legislature has authorized the
issuance of up to $85 million in certificates of participation during the
State's 1993-94 fiscal year for personal and real property acquisitions during
the State's 1993-94 fiscal year. The projection of the State regarding its
borrowings for the 1993-94 fiscal year may change if actual receipts fall
short of State projections or if other circumstances require.
In June 1990, legislation was enacted creating the "New York Local
Government Assistance Corporation" ("LGAC"), a public benefit corporation
empowered to issue long-term obligations to fund certain payments to local
governments traditionally funded through the State's annual seasonal
borrowing. To date, LGAC has issued its bonds to provide net proceeds of $3.28
billion. LGAC has been authorized to issue additional bonds to provide net
proceeds of $703 million during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
Ratings. The $850 million in TRANS issued by the State in April 1993 were
rated SP-1-Plus by S&P on April 26, 1993, and MIG-1 by Moody's on April 23,
1993, which represents the highest ratings given by such agencies and the
first time the State's TRANS have received these ratings since its May 1989
TRANS issuance. Both agencies cited the State's improved fiscal position as a
significant factor in the upgrading of the April 1993 TRANS.
Moody's rating of the State's general obligation bonds stood at A on
April 23, 1993, and S&P's rating stood at A-with a stable outlook on April 26,
1993, an improvement from S&P's negative outlook prior to April 1993.
Previously, Moody's lowered its rating to A on June 6, 1990, its rating having
been A1 since May 27, 1986. S&P lowered its rating from A to A-on January 13,
1992. S&P's previous ratings were A from March 1990 to January 1992, AA-from
August 1987 to March 1990 and A+ from November 1982 to August 1987.
Moody's, in confirming its rating of the State's general obligation
bonds, and S&P, in improving its outlook on such bonds from negative to
stable, noted the State's improved fiscal condition and reasonable revenue
assumptions contained in the 1993-94 State budget.
The City accounts for approximately 41% of the State's population and
personal income, and the City's financial health affects the State in numerous
ways.
In response to the City's fiscal crisis in 1975, the State took a number
of steps to assist the City in returning to fiscal stability. Among other
actions, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term
financing for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii)
created the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to review and
approve the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the financial
plans also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "Covered
Organizations")).
In February 1975, the New York State Urban Development Corporation
("UDC"), which had approximately $1 billion of outstanding debt, defaulted on
certain of its short-term notes. Shortly after the UDC default, the City
entered a period of financial crisis. Both the State Legislature and the
United States Congress enacted legislation in response to this crisis. During
1975, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term financing
for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii) created
the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to review and approve
the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the financial plans
also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "Covered
Organizations")).
Over the past three years, the rate of economic growth in the City has
slowed substantially, and the City's economy is currently in recession. The
City projects, and its current four-year financial plan assumes, a recovery
early in the 1993 calendar year. The Mayor is responsible for preparing the
City's four-year financial plan, including the City's current financial plan.
The City Comptroller has issued reports concluding that the recession of the
City's economy will be more severe and last longer than is assumed in the
financial plan.
Fiscal Year 1993 and 1993-1996 Financial Plan. The City's 1993 fiscal
year results are projected to be balanced in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The City was required to close
substantial budget gaps in its 1990, 1991 and 1992 fiscal years in order to
maintain balanced operating results.
The City's modified Financial Plan dated February 9, 1993 covering fiscal
years 1993-1996 projects budget gaps for 1994 through 1996. The Office of the
State Deputy Controller for the City of New York has estimated that under the
modified Financial Plan budget gaps will be $102 million for fiscal year 1994,
$196 million for fiscal year 1995 and $354 million for fiscal year 1996,
primarily due to anticipated higher spending on labor costs.
However, the City's modified Plan is dependent upon a gap-closing
program, certain elements of which the staff of Control Board identified on
March 25, 1993 to be at risk due to projected levels of State and Federal aid
and
<PAGE>
56 New York IM-IT-- Series 121
revenue and expenditures estimates which may not be achievable. The Control
Board indicated that the City's modified Financial Plan does not make progress
towards establishing a balanced budget process. The Control Board's report
identified budget gap risks of $1.0 billion, $1.9 billion, $2.3 billion and
$2.6 billion in fiscal years 1994 through 1997, respectively.
On June 3, 1993, the Mayor announced that State and federal aid for
Fiscal Year 1993-1994 would be $280 million less than projected and that in
order to balance the City's budget $176 million of previously announced
contingent budget cuts would be imposed. The Mayor indicated that further
savings would entail serious reductions in services. The State Comptroller on
June 14, 1993 criticized efforts by the Mayor and City Council to balance the
City's budget which rely primarily on one-shot revenues. The Comptroller added
that the City's budget should be based on "recurring revenues that fund
recurring expenditures." Given the foregoing factors, there can be no
assurance that the City will continue to maintain a balanced budget, or that
it can maintain a balanced budget without additional tax or other revenue
increases or reductions in City services, which could adversely affect the
City's economic base.
Pursuant to State law, the City prepares a four-year annual financial
plan, which is reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis and which includes
the City's capital, revenue and expense projections. The City is required to
submit its financial plans to review bodies, including the Control Board. If
the City were to experience certain adverse financial circumstances, including
the occurrence or the substantial likelihood and imminence of the occurrence
of an annual operating deficit of more than $100 million or the loss of access
to the public credit markets to satisfy the City's capital and seasonal
financial requirements, the Control Board would be required by State law to
exercise certain powers, including prior approval of City financial plans,
proposed borrowings and certain contracts.
The City depends on the State for State aid both to enable the City to
balance its budget and to meet its cash requirements. As a result of the
national and regional economic recession, the State's projections of tax
revenues for its 1991 and 1992 fiscal years were substantially reduced. For
its 1993 fiscal year, the State, before taking any remedial action reflected
in the State budget enacted by the State Legislature on April 2, 1992 reported
a potential budget deficit of $4.8 billion. If the State experiences revenue
shortfalls or spending increases beyond its projections during its 1993 fiscal
year or subsequent years, such developments could also result in reductions in
projected State aid to the City. In addition, there can be no assurance that
State budgets in future fiscal years will be adopted by the April 1 statutory
deadline and that there will not be adverse effects on the City's cash flow
and additional City expenditures as a result of such delays.
The City's projections set forth in its financial plan are based on
various assumptions and contingencies which are uncertain and which may not
materialize. Changes in major assumptions could significantly affect the
City's ability to balance its budget as required by State law and to meet its
annual cash flow and financing requirements. Such assumptions and
contingencies include the timing of any regional and local economic recovery,
the absence of wage increases in excess of the increases assumed in its
financial plan, employment growth, provision of State and Federal aid and
mandate relief, State legislative approval of future State budgets, levels of
education expenditures as may be required by State law, adoption of future
City budgets by the New York City Council, and approval by the Governor or the
State Legislature and the cooperation of MAC with respect to various other
actions proposed in such financial plan.
The City's ability to maintain a balanced operating budget is dependent
on whether it can implement necessary service and personnel reduction programs
successfully. As discussed above, the City must identify additional
expenditure reductions and revenue sources to achieve balanced operating
budgets for fiscal years 1994 and thereafter. Any such proposed expenditure
reductions will be difficult to implement because of their size and the
substantial expenditure reductions already imposed on City operations in the
past two years.
Attaining a balanced budget is also dependent upon the City's ability to
market its securities successfully in the public credit markets. The City's
financing program for fiscal years 1993 through 1996 contemplates issuance of
$15.7 billion of general obligation bonds primarily to reconstruct and
rehabilitate the City's infrastructure and physical assets and to make capital
investments. A significant portion of such bond financing is used to reimburse
the City's general fund for capital expenditures already incurred. In
addition, the City issues revenue and tax anticipation notes to finance its
seasonal working capital requirements. The terms and success of projected
public sales of City general obligation bonds and notes will be subject to
prevailing market conditions at the time of the sale, and no assurance can be
given that the credit markets will absorb the projected amounts of public bond
and note sales. In addition, future developments concerning the City and
public discussion of such developments, the City's future financial
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT-- Series 121 57
needs and other issues may affect the market for outstanding City general
obligation bonds and notes. If the City were unable to sell its general
obligation bonds and notes, it would be prevented from meeting its planned
operating and capital expenditures.
The City Comptroller, the staff of the Control Board, the Office of the
State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York (the "OSDC") and other
agencies and public officials have issued reports and made public statements
which, among other things, state that projected revenues may be less and
future expenditures may be greater than those forecast in the financial plan.
In addition, the Control Board and other agencies have questioned whether the
City has the capacity to generate sufficient revenues in the future to meet
the costs of its expenditure increases and to provide necessary services. It
is reasonable to expect that such reports and statements will continue to be
issued and to engender public comment.
The City achieved balanced operating results as reported in accordance
with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year. During the 1990 and 1991 fiscal years, the
City implemented various actions to offset a projected budget deficit of $3.2
billion for the 1991 fiscal year, which resulted from declines in City revenue
sources and increased public assistance needs due to the recession. Such
actions included $822 million of tax increases and substantial expenditure
reductions.
The quarterly modification to the City's financial plan submitted to the
Control Board on May 7, 1992 (the "1992 Modification") projected a balanced
budget in accordance with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year after taking into
account a discretionary transfer of $455 million to the 1993 fiscal year as
the result of a 1992 fiscal year surplus. In order to achieve a balanced
budget for the 1992 fiscal year, during the 1991 fiscal year, the City
proposed various actions for the 1992 fiscal year to close a projected gap of
$3.3 billion in the 1992 fiscal year.
On November 19, 1992, the City submitted to the Control Board the
Financial Plan for the 1993 through 1996 fiscal years, which is a modification
to a financial plan submitted to the Control Board on June 11, 1992 (the "June
Financial Plan"), and which relates to the City, the Board of Education
("BOE") and the City University of New York ("CUNY"). The 1993-1996 Financial
Plan projects revenues and expenditures of $29.9 billion each for the 1993
fiscal year balanced in accordance with GAAP.
During the 1992 fiscal year, the City proposed various actions to close a
previously projected gap of approximately $1.2 billion for the 1993 fiscal
year. The gap-closing actions for the 1993 fiscal year proposed during the
1992 fiscal year and outlined in the City's June Financial Plan included $489
million of discretionary transfers from the 1992 fiscal year. The 1993-1996
City Financial Plan includes additional gap-closing actions to offset an
additional potential $81 million budget gap.
The 1993-1996 Financial Plan also sets forth projections and outlines a
proposed gap-closing program for the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years to close
projected budget gaps of $1.7 billion, $2.0 billion and $2.6 billion,
respectively, in the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years. On February 9, 1993, the
City issued a modification to the 1993-1996 Financial Plan (the "February
Modification"). The February Modification projects budget gaps for fiscal
years 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $2.1 billion, $3.1 billion and $3.8 billion,
respectively.
Various actions proposed in the 1993-1996 Financial Plan are subject to
approval by the Governor and approval by the State Legislature, and the
proposed increase in Federal aid is subject to approval by Congress and the
President. The State Legislature has in the past failed to approve certain
proposals similar to those that the 1993-1996 Financial Plan assumes will be
approved by the State Legislature during the 1993 fiscal year. If these
actions cannot be implemented, the City will be required to take other actions
to decrease expenditures or increase revenues to maintain a balanced financial
plan.
On March 9, 1993, OSDC issued a report on the February Modification. The
report expressed concern that the budget gaps projected for fiscal years 1994
through 1996 are the largest the City has faced at this point in the financial
planning cycle in at least a decade, and concluded that the February
Modification represented a step backward in the City's efforts to bring
recurring revenues into line with recurring expenditures.
The City is a defendant in a significant number of lawsuits. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, actions commenced and claims
asserted against the City arising out of alleged constitutional violations,
torts, breaches of contracts, and other violations of law and condemnation
proceedings. While the ultimate outcome and fiscal impact, if any, on the
proceedings and claims are not currently predictable, adverse determinations
in certain of them might have a material adverse effect upon the City's
ability to carry out its financial plan. As of June 30, 1992, legal claims in
<PAGE>
58 New York IM-IT-- Series 121
excess of $341 billion were outstanding against the City for which the City
estimated its potential future liability to be $2.3 billion.
As of the date of this prospectus, Moody's rating of the City's general
obligation bonds stood at Baa1 and S&P's rating stood at A-. On February 11,
1991, Moody's had lowered its rating from A.
On March 30, 1993, in confirming its Baa1 rating, Moody's noted that:
The financial plan for fiscal year 1994 and beyond shows an ongoing
imbalance between the City's expenditures and revenues. The key indication
of this structural imbalance is not necessarily the presence of sizable
out-year budget gaps, but the recurring use of one-shot actions to close
gaps. One-shots constitute a significant share of the proposed gap-closing
program for fiscal year 1994, and they represent an even larger share of
those measures which the City seems reasonably certain to attain. Several
major elements of the program, including certain state actions, federal
counter cyclical aid and part of the city's tax package, remain uncertain.
However, the gap closing plan may be substantially altered when the
executive budget is offered later this spring.
On March 30, 1993, S&P affirmed its A-rating with a negative outlook,
stating that:
The City's key credit factors are marked by a high and growing debt
burden, and taxation levels that are relatively high, but stable. The
City's economy is broad-based and diverse, but currently is in prolonged
recession, with slow growth prospects for the foreseeable future.
The rating outlook is negative, reflecting the continued fiscal
pressure facing the City, driven by continued weakness in the local
economy, rising spending pressures for education and labor costs of city
employees, and increasing costs associated with rising debt for capital
construction and repair.
The current financial plan for the City assumes substantial increases
in aid from national and state governments. Maintenance of the current
rating, and stabilization of the rating outlook, will depend on the City's
success in realizing budgetary aid from these governments, or replacing
those revenues with ongoing revenue-raising measures or spending
reductions under the City's control. However, increased reliance on
non-recurring budget balancing measures that would support current
spending, but defer budgetary gaps to future years, would be viewed by S&P
as detrimental to New York City's single-'A-' rating.
Previously, Moody's had raised its rating to A in May, 1988, to Baa1 in
December, 1985, to Baa in November, 1983 and to Ba1 in November, 1981. S&P had
raised its rating to A-in November, 1987, to BBB+ in July, 1985 and to BBB in
March, 1981.
On May 9, 1990, Moody's revised downward its rating on outstanding City
revenue anticipation notes from MIG-1 to MIG-2 and rated the $900 million
Notes then being sold MIG-2. On April 30, 1991 Moody's confirmed its MIG-2
rating for the outstanding revenue anticipation notes and for the $1.25
billion in notes then being sold. On April 29, 1991, S&P revised downward its
rating on City revenue anticipation notes from SP-1 to SP-2.
As of December 31, 1992, the City and MAC had, respectively, $20.3
billion and $4.7 billion of outstanding net long-term indebtedness.
Certain Agencies of the State have faced substantial financial
difficulties which could adversely affect the ability of such Agencies to make
payments of interest on, and principal amounts of, their respective bonds. The
difficulties have in certain instances caused the State (under so-called
"moral obligation" provisions which are non-binding statutory provisions for
State appropriations to maintain various debt service reserve funds) to
appropriate funds on behalf of the Agencies. Moreover, it is expected that the
problems faced by these Agencies will continue and will require increasing
amounts of State assistance in future years. Failure of the State to
appropriate necessary amounts or to take other action to permit those Agencies
having financial difficulties to meet their obligations could result in a
default by one or more of the Agencies. Such default, if it were to occur,
would be likely to have a significant adverse effect on investor confidence
in, and therefore the market price of, obligations of the defaulting Agencies.
In addition, any default in payment on any general obligation of any Agency
whose bonds contain a moral obligation provision could constitute a failure of
certain conditions that must be satisfied in connection with Federal
guarantees of City and MAC obligations and could thus jeopardize the City's
long-term financing plans.
As of September 30, 1992, the State reported that there were eighteen
Agencies that each had outstanding debt of $100 million or more. These
eighteen Agencies had an aggregate of $62.2 billion of outstanding debt,
including
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT-- Series 121 59
refunding bonds, of which the State was obligated under lease-purchase,
contractual obligation or moral obligation provisions on $25.3 billion.
The State is a defendant in numerous legal proceedings pertaining to
matters incidental to the performance of routine governmental operations. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, claims asserted against the State
arising from alleged torts, alleged breaches of contracts, condemnation
proceedings and other alleged violations of State and Federal laws. Included
in the State's outstanding litigation are a number of cases challenging the
constitutionality or the adequacy and effectiveness of a variety of
significant social welfare programs primarily involving the State's mental
hygiene programs. Adverse judgments in these matters generally could result in
injunctive relief coupled with prospective changes in patient care which could
require substantial increased financing of the litigated programs in the
future.
The State is also engaged in a variety of claims wherein significant
monetary damages are sought. Actions commenced by several Indian nations claim
that significant amounts of land were unconstitutionally taken from the
Indians in violation of various treaties and agreements during the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries. The claimants seek recovery of approximately six
million acres of land as well as compensatory and punitive damages.
The U.S. Supreme Court on March 30, 1993 referred to a Special Master for
determination of damages in an action by the State of Delaware to recover
certain unclaimed dividends, interest and other distributions made by issuers
of securities held by New York based-brokers incorporated in Delaware. (State
of Delaware v. State of New York.) The State had taken such unclaimed property
under its Abandoned Property Law. The State expects that it may pay a
significant amount in damages during fiscal year 1993-94 but it has indicated
that it has sufficient funds on hand to pay any such award, including funds
held in contingency reserves. The State's 1993-94 Financial Plan includes the
establishment of a $100 million contingency reserve fund which would be
available to fund such an award which some reports have estimated at $100-$800
million.
In Schulz v. State of New York, commenced May 24, 1993 ("Schulz 1993"),
petitioners have challenged the constitutionality of mass transportation
bonding programs of the New York State Thruway Authority and the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority. On May 24, 1993, the Supreme Court, Albany County,
temporarily enjoined the State from implementing those bonding programs. In
previous actions Mr. Schulz and others have challenged on similar grounds
bonding programs for the New York State Urban Development Corporation and the
New York Local Government Assistance Corporation. While there have been no
decisions on the merits in such previous actions, by an opinion dated May 11,
1993, the New York Court of Appeals held in a proceeding commenced on April
29, 1991 in the Supreme Court, Albany County (Schulz v. State of New York),
that petitioners had standing as voters under the State Constitution to bring
such action.
Petitioners in Schulz 1993 have asserted that issuance of bonds by the
two Authorities is subject to approval by statewide referendum. At this time
there can be no forecast of the likelihood of success on the merits by the
petitioners, but a decision upholding this constitutional challenge could
restrict and limit the ability of the State and its instrumentalities to
borrow funds in the future. The State has not indicated that the temporary
injunction issued by the Supreme Court in this action will have any immediate
impact on its financial condition or interfere with projects requiring
immediate action.
Adverse developments in the foregoing proceedings or new proceedings
could adversely affect the financial condition of the State in the future.
Certain localities in addition to New York City could have financial
problems leading to requests for additional State assistance. Both the Revised
1992-1993 State Financial Plan and the recommended 1993-94 State Financial
Plan includes a significant reduction in State aid to localities in such
programs as revenue sharing and aid to education from projected base-line
growth in such programs. It is expected that such reductions will result in
the need for localities to reduce their spending or increase their revenues.
The potential impact on the State of such actions by localities is not
included in projections of State receipts and expenditures in the State's
1993-94 fiscal year.
Fiscal difficulties experienced by the City of Yonkers ("Yonkers")
resulted in the creation of the Financial Control Board for the City of
Yonkers (the "Yonkers Board") by the State in 1984. The Yonkers Board is
charged with oversight of the fiscal affairs of Yonkers. Future actions taken
by the Governor or the State Legislature to assist Yonkers could result in
allocation of State resources in amounts that cannot yet be determined.
<PAGE>
60 New York IM-IT-- Series 121
Municipalities and school districts have engaged in substantial
short-term and long-term borrowings. In 1991, the total indebtedness of all
localities in the State was approximately $31.6 billion, of which $16.8
billion was debt of New York City (excluding $6.7 billion in MAC debt). State
law requires the Comptroller to review and make recommendations concerning the
budgets of those local government units other than New York City authorized by
State law to issue debt to finance deficits during the period that such
deficit financing is outstanding. Fifteen localities had outstanding
indebtedness for state financing at the close of their fiscal year ending in
1991. In 1992, an unusually large number of local government units requested
authorization for deficit financings. According to the Comptroller, ten local
government units have been authorized to issue deficit financing in the
aggregate amount of $131.1 million.
Certain proposed Federal expenditure reductions could reduce, or in some
cases eliminate, Federal funding of some local programs and accordingly might
impose substantial increased expenditure requirements on affected localities.
If the State, New York City or any of the Agencies were to suffer serious
financial difficulties jeopardizing their respective access to the public
credit markets, the marketability of notes and bonds issued by localities
within the State, including notes or bonds in the New York IM-IT Trust, could
be adversely affected. Localities also face anticipated and potential problems
resulting from certain pending litigation, judicial decisions, and long-range
economic trends. The longer-range potential problems of declining urban
population, increasing expenditures, and other economic trends could adversely
affect localities and require increasing State assistance in the future.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on New York IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Tanner Propp & Farber, special counsel to the Fund for
New York tax matters, under existing New York law:
The New York IM-IT Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation and the income of the New York IM-IT Trust will be treated
as the income of the Unitholders under the income tax laws of the State
and City of New York. Individuals who reside in New York State or City
will not be subject to State and City tax on interest income which is
exempt from Federal income tax under section 103 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and derived from obligations of New York State or a
political subdivision thereof, although they will be subject to New York
State and City tax with respect to any gains realized when such
obligations are sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when any such
Units are sold or redeemed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 58.02
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>............................................................. $ 2.06
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit..................................................... $ .13
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.83
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.83
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.65
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15508
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F2><F3><F4>........................................... 5.58%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F2><F3><F4>........................................................................ 5.67%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.81
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F4>.................................................................... $ 4.65
PURCHASED INTEREST <F5>........................................................................................ $ 9.67
Trustee's Annual Fee................... $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> Excluding insurance costs.
<F2> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the
<PAGE>
New York IM-IT-- Series 121 61
Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and
estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F4> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F5> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
62 New York IM-IT-- Series 121
<TABLE>
NEW YORK INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 121 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND NEW YORK
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR REDEMPTION IM-IT
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> RATING<F2> FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 210,000 South Lewis Central School District, New York, Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation Bonds (Bank Qualified) Series 1994
(AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
#5.875% Due 6/15/2014........................................ YAAA 2003 @ 102 $ 204,473
100,000 County of Monroe, New York, General Obligation Bonds (Public
Improvement Bonds-1994) AMBAC Indemnity Insured
6.15% Due 6/1/2016........................................... YAAA 2004 @ 102 100,500
500,000 Metropolitan Transportation Authority (New York) Commuter
Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1992B (MBIA
Insured) 2002 @ 102
#6.25% Due 7/1/2017.......................................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 504,265
500,000 New York State Thruway Authority, General Revenue Bonds, Series
1993B (MBIA Insured) 2004 @ 102
#5.00% Due 1/1/2020.......................................... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 417,965
500,000 New York Medical Care Facilities Finance Agency, Mental Health
Services Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1994D (MBIA
Insured) 2004 @ 102
6.20% Due 2/15/2020.......................................... YAAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 499,315
500,000 New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority (New York)
Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series F (MBIA Insured)
#5.75% Due 6/15/2020......................................... AAA 2004 @ 101.5 471,280
200,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, State University
Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (State University of New
York) Series 1992A 2003 @ 102
#6.00% Due 5/15/2022......................................... BBB+ 2018 @ 100 S.F. 189,426
500,000 New York State Energy Research and Development Authority,
Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (New York State
Electric and Gas Corporation) Series 1994A (MBIA Insured)
6.05% Due 4/1/2034........................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 481,525
$ 3,010,000 $ 2,868,749
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
insurers (as indicated in the Bond name) or under the portfolio insurance
policy obtained by the Trust from AMBAC Indemnity. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
Hawaii QUALITY-- Series 1 63
HAWAII QUALITY TRUST
GENERAL. The Hawaii Quality Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities.
Three of the Bonds in the Hawaii Quality Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Hawaii Quality Trust) as follows: Single Family Mortgage Revenue, 2
(33%); General Obligations, 3 (25%); General Purpose, 1 (18%); Health Care, 1
(16%) and Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (8%). No Bond issue has received a
provisional rating.
RISK FACTORS. The following discussion regarding constitutional
limitations and the economy of the State of Hawaii is included for the purpose
of providing general information that may or may not affect issuers of the
Bonds in Hawaii.
Hawaii was admitted to the Union on August 21, 1959 as the 50th state and
is currently the 41st most populous state. Hawaii's population was 1,115,274
in 1990, as reported by the Census. According to the Census, about 75% of this
population lives on Oahu, the site of the State's capital. Hawaii's population
contains great ethnic diversity, consisting of immigrants from the Far East
and Europe, as well as the mainland U.S.
The Hawaiian economy is based primarily on tourism with most employment
located in the service and retail trade sectors. Tourists in Hawaii pay a
large portion of both the General Excise Tax and the Transient Accommodation
Tax. The General Excise and Use Tax made up 53.7% of net receipts without
adjustments for 1992 and the Transient Accommodations Tax was the fourth
largest individual tax of net receipts in 1992. Approximately 6.5 million
tourists came to the State in 1992, spending an estimated $9.6 billion while
in the State. This number of tourists decreased 5.2% from 1991, mostly due to
the U.S. recession as westbound visitors (80% from U.S.) fell from 4.7 million
in 1990, to 4.6 million in 1991, to 4.0 million in 1992. Eastbound visitors,
however, increased from 2.2 million in 1990, to 2.3 million in 1991, to 3.5
million in 1992. Total visitors to the State for the first half of 1993 fell
by 6.5% from those of 1992.
The unemployment rate in the state of Hawaii was 4.8% as of June 1993,
significantly below the national rate of 6.8%.
The State's revised total personal income was an estimated $24.8 billion
in 1992 and has increased at a 7.5% average annual rate since 1980, slightly
faster than the national rate over this decade. The State's revised per capita
personal income was $21,218 in 1992, higher than the 1992 U.S. figure of
$19,841. The per capita personal income in the State has increased at a 5.8%
average annual rate since 1980, slightly lower than the 5.9% rate for the
nation. Hawaii's total personal income for the first quarter of 1993 was
$25,571, up 2.9% from $24,844 for the same period last year.
The General Fund revenues in 1992 grew at an actual annual growth rate of
1.5%. In 1993, the Council on Revenues estimated, as of April 1993, that the
General Fund revenues would increase by 3.2%. When the General Fund balance at
the close of each two successive fiscal years exceeds 5% of General Fund
Revenues for the two fiscal years, the legislature in the next regular session
provides a credit to state taxpayers. This credit has been issued from 1981 to
1992, inclusive. As of May 1993, the Department of Budget and Finance projects
the General Fund balance at fiscal year-end to be $314.8 million.
Inflation adjusted single family home construction fell 9.0% in 1992, but
is expected to be offset by increases in alterations and additions. Employment
in the construction industry has declined, but is expected to return to 1991
peak levels due to repair work from Hurricane Iniki. The hurricane hit island
Kuaui in September 1992 causing an estimated $1.7 billion worth of property,
agricultural, and commercial damage as estimated by the Department of
Business, Economic Development, and Tourism. The State has not experienced any
materially adverse economic or financial impact so far, as the federal
government has provided additional funding to the state in the form of public
assistance, loans, and grants with minimum state matching requirements from
the General Fund.
Currently, Moody's Investors Service rates Hawaii general obligation
bonds "Aa" and Standard & Poor's Corporation rates Hawaii general obligation
bonds "AA". Although these ratings indicate that the state of Hawaii is in
<PAGE>
64 Hawaii QUALITY-- Series 1
relatively good economic health, there can, of course, be no assurance that
this will continue or that particular bond issues may not be adversely
affected by changes in state or local economic conditions. Also, it should be
noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local Hawaii issuers
may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the state of
Hawaii, and that there is no obligation on the part of the State to make
payment on such local obligations in the event of default.
The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the
general factors which may impact certain issuers of Bonds and does not purport
to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions to which
the issuers of obligations held by the Hawaii Quality Trust are subject.
Additionally, many factors including national economic, social and
environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the
issuers of the Bonds, could affect or could have an adverse impact on the
financial condition of the State and various agencies and political
subdivisions located in the State. The Sponsor is unable to predict whether or
to what extent such factors or other factors may affect the issuers of the
Bonds, the market value or marketability of the Bonds or the ability of the
respective issuers of the Bonds acquired by the Hawaii Quality Trust to pay
interest on or principal on the Bonds.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on Hawaii Quality Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
We understand that the Hawaii Trust will only have income consisting of
(i) interest from bonds issued by the State of Hawaii and its political and
governmental subdivisions, municipalities and governmental agencies and
instrumentalities and bonds issued by possessions of the United States which
would be exempt from federal and Hawaii income taxation when paid directly to
an individual, trust or estate (the "Bonds"), (ii) gain on the disposition of
such Bonds, and (iii) proceeds paid under certain insurance policies issued to
the Trustee or to the issuers of the Bonds which represent maturing interest
or principal payments on defaulted Bonds held by the Trustee.
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the Bonds
to be deposited in and held in the Trust. However, although no opinion is
expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that: (i) the Bonds
were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is excludible from gross income
for federal income tax purposes and (iii) the interest thereon is exempt from
income tax imposed by Hawaii that is applicable to individuals, trusts and
estates (the "Hawaii Income Tax"). It should be noted that interest on the
Bonds is subject to tax in the case of certain banks and financial
institutions subject to Hawaii's franchise tax and corporations subject to
Hawaii's corporate alternative minimum tax. The opinion set forth below does
not address the taxation of persons other than full time residents of Hawaii.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, Counsel to the Sponsor, under
existing Hawaii income tax law as of the date of this prospectus and based
upon the assumptions above:
(1) The Hawaii Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation and
each Unitholder of the Hawaii Trust will be treated as the owner of a
pro rata portion of the Hawaii Trust and the income of such portion of
the Hawaii Trust will therefore be treated as the income of the
Unitholder for Hawaii Income Tax purposes;
(2) Income on the Bonds which is exempt from the Hawaii Income Tax when
received by a Unitholder of the Hawaii Trust and which would be exempt
from the Hawaii Income Tax if received directly by a Unitholder, will
retain its status as exempt from such tax when received by the Hawaii
Trust and distributed to such Unitholder;
(3) To the extent that interest on the Bonds, if any, is includible in
the computation of "alternative minimum taxable income" for federal
income tax purposes, such interest will also be includible in the
computation of "alternative minimum taxable income" for purposes of
Hawaii's corporate alternative minimum tax on corporations;
(4) Each Unitholder of the Hawaii Trust will recognize gain or loss for
Hawaii Income Tax purposes if the Trustee disposes of a Bond (whether
by redemption, sale or otherwise) or if the Unitholder redeems or
sells Units of the Hawaii Trust to the extent that such a transaction
results in a recognized gain or loss to such Unitholder for federal
income tax purposes;
<PAGE>
Hawaii QUALITY-- Series 1 65
(5) Tax cost reduction requirements relating to amortization of bond
premium may, under some circumstances, result in Unitholders realizing
taxable gain for Hawaii Income Tax purposes when their Units are sold
or redeemed for an amount equal to or less than their original cost;
(6) Proceeds, if any, paid under individual insurance policies
obtainted by issuers of Bonds or the Trustee which represent maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be
excludible from Hawaii net income if, and to the same extent as, such
interest would have been so excludible if paid in the normal course by
the issuer of the defaulted obligation provided that, at the time such
policies are purchased, the amounts paid for such policies are
reasonable, customary and consistent with the reasonable expectation
that the issuer of the bonds, rather than the insurer, will pay debt
service on the bonds; and
(7) To the extent that interest derived from the Hawaii Trust by a
Unitholder with respect to any Possession Bonds is excludible from
gross income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to 48 U.S.C.
Section 745, 48 U.S.C. Section 1423a and 48 U.S.C. Section 1403, such
interest will also not be subject to the Hawaii Income Tax. It should
be noted that interest relating to Possession Bonds is subject to tax
in the case of certain banks and financial institutions subject to the
Hawaii's franchise tax and corporations subject to Hawaii's corporate
alternative minimum tax.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in the
Hawaii Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the opinions of
bond counsel with respect thereto, and therefore express no opinion as to the
exemption from State income taxes of interest on the Bonds if received
directly by a Unitholder.
<PAGE>
66 Hawaii QUALITY-- Series 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 56.85
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit.................................................................. $ 2.02
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 54.83
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 54.83
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.57
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15229
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F2><F3>........................................... 5.48%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F1><F2><F3>........................................................................ 5.54%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.72
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F3>.................................................................... $ 4.57
PURCHASED INTEREST <F4>........................................................................................ $ 9.47
Trustee's Annual Fee................... $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F2> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F3> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F4> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Hawaii QUALITY-- Series 1 67
<TABLE>
HAWAII INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST
SERIES 1 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND RATING<F2> HAWAII
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR STANDARD REDEMPTION QUALITY
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> & POOR'S MOODY'S FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 280,000 Honolulu, Hawaii, City and County General Obligation
Bonds, Series 1994B
#6.10% Due 6/1/2011................................ AA Aa 2004 @ 101 $ 283,704
250,000 City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, General
Obligation Bonds, Refunding and Improvement Series
1993B
#5.50% Due 10/1/2011............................... AA Aa 237,988
250,000 County of Maui, Hawaii, General Obligation Bonds,
1993 Refunding Series F and 1993 Series G (FGIC
Insured)
#5.125% Due 12/15/2013............................. AAA Aaa 2003 @ 101 227,747
250,000 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue
Bonds, Series 1994T (FSA Insured) 2004 @ 102
#6.00% Due 7/1/2016................................ YAAA Aaa 2010 @ 100 S.F. 247,750
500,000 Hawaii State Housing Finance and Development
Corporation, Rental Housing System, Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A 2003 @ 102
5.70% Due 7/1/2018................................. N/R A1 2013 @ 100 S.F. 468,595
550,000 Hawaii State Department of Budget and Finance,
Special Purpose Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Kapiolali Health Care System Obligated Group)
Series 1993 2003 @ 102
#6.00% Due 7/1/2019................................ A A 2014 @ 100 S.F. 535,799
500,000 Hawaii State Department of Budget and Finance,
Special Purpose Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Kaiser Permanante Health System) Series 1991A 2001 @ 102
#6.25% Due 3/1/2021................................ AA Aa2 2017 @ 100 S.F. 507,500
500,000 Hawaii State Housing Finance and Development
Corporation, Single Family Mortgage Purchase
Revenue Bonds, Series 1994B (MBIA Insured) 2004 @ 102
#5.90% Due 7/1/2027................................ AAA Aaa 2026 @ 100 S.F. 488,335
$ 3,080,000 $ 2,997,418
</TABLE>
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
68 Oregon QUALITY-- Series 53
OREGON QUALITY TRUST
GENERAL. The Oregon Quality Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities.
Three of the Bonds in the Oregon Quality Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Oregon Quality Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 3 (40%); Retail
Electric/Gas, 2 (20%); Higher Education, 1 (16%); Water and Sewer, 1 (16%) and
Single Family Mortgage Revenue, 1 (8%). No Bond issue has received a
provisional or conditional rating.
RISK FACTORS. Oregon's nonagricultural employment growth in 1988 exceeded
the United States' rate for the third consecutive year. While the decade of
1970 to 1980 marked a time of rapid growth, the early years of the 1980s were
a period of retrenchment and job losses. Oregon finally regained
pre-recessionary nonagricultural employment levels (compared to 1979) in 1986,
and continued growing quickly through 1988.
The service and retail and wholesale trade sectors have contributed most
of the job gains. In 1979, services comprised 18 percent and retail and
wholesale trade 24 percent of total nonagricultural employment. Manufacturing
contributed 22 percent. By 1988, services grew to 23 percent, retail and
wholesale trade rose to 25 percent, but manufacturing shrank to 19 percent.
During the period 1979 to 1988, services and retail and wholesale trade added
110,000 jobs while manufacturing jobs dropped by 14,000.
Total state population and personal income followed similar trends. From
1975 to 1980, both population and personal income exceeded national growth
rates. In the late 1970s, Oregon's populaton grew at a rate of two to three
times the national average. The early 1980s marked a reversal of this trend,
and population and personal income growth slowed to rates below the national
average.
Recent economic trends have been favorable. In early 1987, the State's
unemployment rate dipped below the national rate, and State employment growth
exceeded the national average. Increased demand for wood products, primary
metals, and machinery and rapidly growing nonmanufacturing sectors helped push
the growth rates upward.
A mild climate, varied topography and rich soil support the nearly 100
agricultural commodities grown in Oregon and valued in terms of gross farm
sales at over $2.3 billion in 1988. Much of this agricultural activity occurs
in the Willamette River Valley in the western portion of the State. This
valley also contains most of the State's population and much of the
manufacturing activity.
Portland, located at the confluence of the Columbia and Willamette
Rivers, remains Oregon's largest city and the hub of economic activity. The
greater Portland area is a highly diversified manufacturing center. It is also
the home of the Port of Portland, a significant seaport for trade between the
western United States and the Pacific Rim nations.
Outside the Willamette Valley, those areas not devoted primarily to
agriculture rely on the wood products industry and tourism. Although the wood
products industry is still sensitive to economic fluctuations, increased
automation and improved management are enabling the industry to reach all-time
high production levels with fewer workers.
Oregon's economy grew moderately in the two decades immediately following
World War II. From 1950 to 1970, nonagricultural employment growth averaged
2.7 percent per year. In the 1970s, however, the State experienced rapid
growth as population increased and economic diversification continued.
Oregon's growth significantly outpaced the national average: from 1975 to 1980
nonagricultural employment growth averaged 6.1 percent per year and per capita
income rose above the U.S. average.
The early 1980s recessions hit Oregon hard. In 1982, nonagricultural
employment fell by 5.7 percent with much of the loss from the wood products
industry. Oregon remains slightly more sensitive to economic cycles than the
national average due to the forest products component of its economy. Although
recessionary periods continue to be somewhat more pronounced in Oregon than in
the nation as a whole, the higher proportion of nonmanufacturing jobs and
restructuring of the lumber and wood industry has provided more stability.
<PAGE>
Oregon QUALITY-- Series 53 69
While the high technology industries added a significant number of jobs
in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the State has followed national trends and
lost jobs as a result of a slump in the semi-conductor, electronics and
instruments industries. In recent years, these industries have stabilized and
started adding workers.
The high interest rates experienced early in the 1980s had a significant
impact on certain sectors of the Oregon economy. The recession-sensitive wood
products, housing, and construction industries were particularly hard hit.
Rural counties of eastern and southern Oregon which depend on one or a
combination of these industries experienced the greatest impact. Many of these
counties have since diversified more and have benefited significantly from
improved tourism traffic. In urban areas generally, and in Portland in
particular, the diverse economic base has given a measure of insulation from
the impacts of the recession.
By 1984, the State began to recover and experienced a higher employment
growth rate at 4.2 percent, but this rate was still lower than the U.S. rate.
The State finally surpassed prerecessionary employment levels in 1986 and has
recently been growing faster than the U.S. average.
Tourism has been strong throughout the 1980s, due in part to the
plentiful supplies of relatively low-cost automobile fuel and improved
national economy. Oregon's wood products industry is undergoing a permanent
restructuring, as many mills have automated and improved their productivity
greatly. The State has committed itself to greater diversification of the
economy by pursuing more foreign trade in the considerable markets of the
Pacific Rim countries.
Between 1979 and 1988, total nonagricultural wage and salary employment
in Oregon rose from 1,056,200 to 1,152,300, an increase of 9.1 percent. During
this period, however, employment exhibited three different trends.
In 1979, a dramatic rise in interest rates severely hurt credit-sensitive
industries such as construction and lumber and wood products and plunged the
Nation into the worst recession since the 1930s. Oregon's housing-dependent
economy was especially hard hit. Between 1979 and 1982, wage and salary
employment plummeted by 9 percent to 960,000, a loss of 95,400 jobs.
While the severity of the recession eliminated many jobs, both in
manufacturing (42,800) and non-manufacturing (52,600), it also caused interest
rates and the inflation rate eventually to drop significantly. This
improvement, plus more stimulative federal monetary and fiscal policies, set
the stage for another period of economic expansion beginning in early 1983. In
the six year period between 1982 and 1988, Oregon's wage and salary employment
increased by 20 percent to reach a new all-time high of 1,152,300, a gain of
191,500 jobs.
The current expansion differs from previous recovery periods. During the
last six years, manufacturing employment has risen by 28,600 jobs but is still
about 14,200 below its 1979 pre-recession peak of 228,500. This slow rate of
recovery largely reflects increased competition from foreign imports,
automation and increased productivity. In the first half of the 1980s, the
rising foreign exchange value of the dollar made U.S. exported goods more
expensive overseas, while foreign imports became cheaper to U.S. consumers.
Although the dollar's exchange value has been falling since 1985, imports have
captured a greater share of U.S. markets. Manufacturing firms in Oregon and
the Nation have responded by reducing their costs, restructuring their
operations and automating production processes wherever possible. In some
cases, these efficiencies have resulted in few jobs even though production
volumes have recovered and reached new all-time highs. Oregon's primary
industry, lumber and wood products, is one such example.
About 85 percent of the 191,500 new wage and salary jobs added in the
1982-1988 period came in non-manufacturing. Although every non-manufacturing
industrial category except mining, communications and utilities increased
employment, the service and trade industries accounted for eight out of every
ten new non-manufacturing jobs. Job growth was especially strong in food
stores, eating and drinking places, health care and business services.
In its 1989 Regular Session, the Oregon Legislature approved General Fund
appropriations totaling $4,585,476,617 for the 1989-1991 biennium. This is a
22 percent increase compared to estimated 1987-1989 expenditures.
A complete analysis of State General Fund finances for 1989-1991 will not
be available until after the impact of all legislative actions affecting
expenditures are compiled.
<PAGE>
70 Oregon QUALITY-- Series 53
The following is a summary of the September 1, 1989 quarterly Economic
and Revenue Forecast required by ORS 291.342.
The much heralded "soft landing" scenario appears the most likely course
for the U.S. economy over the short term. Such a scenario implies an extended
period of lower growth, an easing of inflationary pressures, and little
improvement in the unemployment rate. The greatest short-term risk to the soft
landing is overreaction by the Federal Reserve in easing credit. Easing would
stimulate growth and a rise in inflation in the short-run, which would later
induce Federal tightening and plunge the economy into a recession.
In late 1989 and early 1990, the anticipated soft landing will reduce
employment growth in Oregon and the U.S. Overall, Oregon employment is
expected to increase by 13,600 over the next year (second quarter to second
quarter), and 7,700 over the following year. This means that, relative to the
May forecast, 3,100 fewer jobs will be generated in the next year. Still,
employment growth in Oregon is expected to exceed gains nation-wide in 1989.
The primary reasons for the slowdown in Oregon are: (1) expected timber
supply reductions, which will directly reduce lumber and wood products and
transportation employment; (2) a gradual slowdown in construction, as
apartment vacancy rates begin to rise and Oregon's population growth rate
begins to slow; and (3) the ending of Oregon's retail trade boom, which
brought increased competition in the form of many new retail chains and stores
to Oregon.
Total Oregon employment increased by 8,400 in the second quarter, 1,200
less than anticipated in the May 1989 forecast. Manufacturing employment
increased by 700, while nonmanufacturing employment increased by 7,700.
Total General Fund collections in 1987-1989 were $49.4 million above the
May 15 forecast and $211.4 million above the estimate made at the close of the
1987 Regular session. Both Corporate Excise and income tax receipts and all
other General Fund revenues exceeded the close of Regular Session estimate by
more than two percent. Therefore, ORS 291.349 (known as the "two percent
kicker" law) requires that all unanticipated revenues be returned to the
taxpayers. Corporate income taxpayers will receive a 19.7 percent credit on
their tax year 1989 liabilities to return the $36.2 million in unanticipated
Corporate Excise and Income Tax revenues. Personal income taxpayers will
receive a 9.8 percent credit on their tax year 1989 liabilities to return
unanticipated receipts of $175.2 million from all noncorporate General Fund
revenue sources.
More than 40 bills passed by the 1989 Legislature changed expected
General Fund revenue receipts. Altogether, these bills raised expected
1989-1991 receipts by $25.4 million, with expected Personal Income Taxes
increasing $29.9 million. Corporate Excise and Income taxes increasing by $4.9
million, and all other General Fund revenues decreasing by $9.4 million. The
Legislature appropriated $4,585.5 million for the 1989-1991 period, leaving an
ending balance of $121.7 million.
The September General Fund revenue forecast anticipates that the state
will receive $9.6 million more during 1989-1991 than was anticipated at the
close of the 1989 Regular Session. This, combined with the surge in 1987-1989
revenues, pushes the expected 1989-1991 ending balance to $181.0 million.
The September Personal Income Tax forecast for 1989-1991 has been
increased by $39.8 million because the high final payments individuals made
during the 1989 filing season are expected to continue. The Corporate Excise
and Income Tax forecast has been lowered by $10.2 million, again reflecting
receipts during the critical April filing season. Expected Insurance Tax
receipts have been decreased by $21.4 million because of an unanticipated
weakening in commercial insurance premiums.
The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the
financial difficulties which may impact certain issuers of Bonds and does not
purport to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions
to which the issuers in the Oregon Quality Trust are subject. Additionally,
many factors including national economic, social and environmental policies
and conditions, which are not within the control of the issuers of Bonds,
could affect or could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of the
State and various agencies and political subdivisions located in the State.
The Sponsor is unable to predict whether or to what extent such factors or
other
<PAGE>
Oregon QUALITY-- Series 53 71
factors may affect the issuers of Bonds, the market value or marketability of
the Bonds or the ability of the respective issuers of the Bonds acquired by
the Oregon Quality Trust to pay interest on or principal of the Bonds.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on Oregon Quality Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
The assets of the Oregon Trust will consist of interest-bearing
obligations issued by or on behalf of the State of Oregon (the "State") or
counties, municipalities, authorities or political subdivisions thereof (the
"Oregon Bonds") or by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam and the United
States Virgin Islands (the "Possession Bonds") (collectively, the "Bonds").
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the Bonds to
be deposited in and held in the Oregon Quality Trust. However, although no
opinion is expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that: (i)
the Bonds were validly issued; (ii) the interest thereon is excludible from
gross income for federal income tax purposes; and (iii) interest on the Bonds,
if received directly by an Oregon Unitholder, would be exempt from the Oregon
income tax applicable to individuals (the "Oregon Personal Income Tax").
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, Special Counsel to the Fund for
Oregon tax matters, under existing Oregon law and based on the assumptions set
forth above:
The Oregon Quality Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation
and based upon an administrative rule of the Oregon State Department of
Revenue, each Oregon Unitholder of the Oregon Quality Trust will be
essentially treated as the owner of a pro rata portion of the Oregon Quality
Trust and the income of such portion of the Oregon Quality Trust will be
treated as the income of the Oregon Unitholder for Oregon Personal Income Tax
purposes;
Interest on the Bonds which is exempt from the Oregon Personal Income Tax
when received by the Oregon Quality Trust, and which would be exempt from the
Oregon Personal Income Tax if received directly by an Oregon Unitholder, will
retain its status as exempt from such tax when received by the Oregon Quality
Trust and distributed to an Oregon Unitholder;
To the extent that interest derived from the Oregon Quality Trust by an
Oregon Unitholder with respect to the Possession Bonds is excludable from
gross income for Federal income tax purposes pursuant to 48 U.S.C. Section
745, 48 U.S.C. Section 1423a and 48 U.S.C. Section 1403, such interest will
not be subject to the Oregon Personal Income Tax. Each Oregon Unitholder of
the Oregon Quality Trust will recognize gain or loss for Oregon Personal
Income Tax purposes if the Trustee disposes of a bond (whether by redemption,
sale or otherwise) or if the Oregon Unitholder redeems or sells Units of the
Oregon Quality Trust to the extent that such a transaction results in a
recognized gain or loss to such Oregon Unitholder for Federal income tax
purposes; and
The Oregon Personal Income Tax does not permit a deduction of interest
paid or incurred on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry
Units in the Oregon Quality Trust, the interest on which is exempt from such
Tax.
Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding collateral tax
consequences under Oregon law relating to the ownership of the Units,
including, but not limited to, the calculation of "net pension income" tax
credits for retirees and the applicability of other Oregon taxes.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in the
Oregon Quality Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the
opinions of bond counsel with respect thereto and therefore express no opinion
as to the exemption from the Oregon Personal Income Tax of interest on the
Bonds if received directly by an Oregon Unitholder. In addition, prospective
purchasers subject to the Oregon corporate income tax should be advised that
for purposes of the Oregon Corporate Income (Excise) Tax, interest on the
Bonds received by the Oregon Quality Trust and distributed to an Oregon
Unitholder subject to such tax will be added to the corporate Oregon
Unitholder's federal taxable income and therefore will be taxable.
<PAGE>
72 Oregon QUALITY-- Series 53
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 56.90
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit.................................................................. $ 2.00
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 54.90
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 54.90
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.58
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15249
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F2><F3>........................................... 5.49%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F1><F2><F3>........................................................................ 5.50%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.73
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F3>.................................................................... $ 4.58
PURCHASED INTEREST <F4>........................................................................................ $ 9.48
Trustee's Annual Fee................... $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F2> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F3> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F4> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Oregon QUALITY-- Series 53 73
<TABLE>
OREGON INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST
SERIES 53 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND RATING<F2> OREGON
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR STANDARD REDEMPTION QUALITY
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> & POOR'S MOODY'S FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 Jefferson County School District No. 509-J, Madras,
Oregon, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1993 (FSA
Insured) 2004 @ 101
#5.50% Due 6/15/2013............................... AAA Aaa 2007 @ 100 S.F. $ 474,500
500,000 Portland, Oregon, Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series
1994A (FSA Insured) 2004 @ 101
6.25% Due 6/1/2015................................. YAAA Aaa 2013 @ 100 S.F. 508,065
250,000 Oregon Housing Community Service Department, Mortgage
Revenue Bonds, Single Family Mortgage Program,
Series 1994C 2004 @ 102
6.25% Due 7/1/2016................................. N/R Aa 2006 @ 100 S.F. 251,250
120,000 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue
Bonds, Series 1994T (FSA Insured) 2004 @ 102
#6.00% Due 7/1/2016................................ AAA Aaa 2010 @ 100 S.F. 118,920
500,000 City of Eugene, Oregon, Electric Utility System
Revenue Bonds, Series 1994 (MBIA Insured)
#5.00% Due 8/1/2019................................ AAA Aaa 2003 @ 101 433,095
250,000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement Bonds
of 1993 (General Obligation Bonds) FSA Insured 2002 @ 101.5
#6.00% Due 7/1/2022................................ AAA Aaa 2019 @ 100 S.F. 247,238
500,000 State of Oregon, General Obligation Elderly and
Disabled Housing Bonds, Refunding Series 1992B 2002 @ 102
#6.375% Due 8/1/2024............................... AA- Aa 2014 @ 100 S.F. 510,725
500,000 Oregon State Health, Housing, Educational and
Cultural Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Lewis
and Clark College Project) Series 1994A (MBIA
Insured) 2004 @ 102
#6.125% Due 10/1/2024.............................. AAA Aaa 2014 @ 100 S.F. 503,525
$ 3,120,000 $ 3,047,318
</TABLE>
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
74 Virginia QUALITY-- Series 61
VIRGINIA QUALITY TRUST
GENERAL. The Virginia Quality Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities.
None of the Bonds in the Virginia Quality Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them or are backed by the taxing power thereof.
All of the issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Virginia Quality Trust) as follows: Water and Sewer, 2 (28%);
Transportation, 2 (19%); Higher Education, 1 (16%); Single Family Mortgage
Revenue, 1 (16%); Health Care, 1 (12%) and General Purpose, 1 (9%). No Bond
issue has received a provisional rating.
RISK FACTORS. The Commonwealth's financial condition is supported by a
broad-based economy, including manufacturing, tourism, agriculture, ports,
mining and fisheries. Manufacturing continues to be a major source of
employment, ranking behind only services, wholesale and retail trade, and
government (Federal, state and local). The Federal government is a major
employer in Virginia due to the heavy concentration of Federal employees in
the metropolitan Washington, D.C. segment of Northern Virginia and the
military employment in the Hampton Roads area, which houses the nation's
largest concentration of military installations. However, the expected
retrenchment of the military sector as a consequence of the end of the Cold
War remains a cloud on the economic horizon.
In recent years per capita personal income in Virginia has consistently
been above the national average. However, while total personal income has
continued to rise during the current recession, it has not always kept pace
with both inflation and the population, either nationally or in Virginia. Real
personal income in Virginia fell for seven consecutive quarters, ending with
the last quarter of 1991, with a slow recovery being evidenced in 1992. The
annualized rate of growth in real personal income in Virginia for the second
quarter of 1992 was 0.5 percent compared to a national rate of 0.3 percent.
Virginia's real per capita income has exceeded that for both the nation and
the southeast region since the early 1980's, although the differentials have
decreased since 1989. Virginia's nonagricultural employment figures mirror the
national economy although the recent recession has hit Virginia harder than
the nation as a whole with employment declining at an average annual rate of
1.6 percent since 1990 in Virginia, compared to 0.7 percent nationally. With
respect to unemployment, Virginia's unemployment rate has consistently been
below that of the nation. For the decade of 1980 to 1990, the differential has
been two percentage points, although it decreased to below one percentage
point in 1991 and the first six months of 1992.
Employment trends in Virginia have varied from sector to sector and from
region to region. For example, manufacturing and trade sectors in 1980 each
employed more workers than the service sector. Now the service sector is the
largest employer in Virginia and mining and manufacturing are now at lower
levels than in 1980. Highest rates of unemployment are concentrated in
southwest Virginia where mining jobs have been lost and the lowest
unemployment rates are seen in Northern Virginia where much federally related
employment is concentrated. Not surprisingly, there is great overlap between
areas of lowest unemployment and those of highest per capita income. Economic
recovery from the recent recession is expected to be long and slow in
Virginia, although in the long term, a growing and more diversified export
sector holds promise that should mitigate current concerns.
The Commonwealth of Virginia has historically operated on a fiscally
conservative basis and is required by its Constitution to have a balanced
biennial budget. At the end of the June 30, 1992, fiscal year, the General
Fund had an ending fund balance computed on a budgetary cash basis of $195.2
million, of which $15 million was in required reserve; $142.3 million thereof
was designated for expenditure during the next fiscal year, leaving an
undesignated, unreserved fund balance of $52.8 million, the first such
undesignated fund balance since 1988. Computed on a modified accrual basis in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the General Fund
balance at the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 1992, was minus $121.8
million, compared with a General Fund balance at the end of the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1991, of minus $265.1 million. Contributing to the reduction
were $256.4 million in deferred credits, representing estimated tax refunds
associated with income taxes withheld for the period January through June,
1992, and an accrual for estimated medicaid claims of $155.8 million.
As of June 30, 1992, total debt of the Commonwealth aggregated $7.3
billion. Of that amount, $1.5 billion was tax-supported. Outstanding general
obligation debt backed by the full faith and credit of the Commonwealth was
$582.7 million at June 30, 1992. Of that amount, $544.4 million was also
secured by revenue producing capital projects. Debt service on the balance
equaled 0.2% of total General Fund expenditures in fiscal year 1992.
<PAGE>
Virginia QUALITY-- Series 61 75
The Virginia Constitution contains limits on the amount of general
obligation bonds which the Commonwealth can issue. These limits are
substantially in excess of current levels of outstanding bonds, and at June
30, 1992 would permit an additional total of approximately $5.00 billion of
bonds secured by revenue-producing projects and approximately $5.50 billion of
unsecured general obligation bonds, with not more than approximately $1.39
billion of the latter to be issued in any four-year period. Bonds which are
not secured by revenue-producing projects must be approved in a state-wide
election.
In November of 1992 the Constitution of Virginia was amended to establish
a permanent Revenue Stabilization Fund. This Fund will go into effect in the
1994-96 biennium. In anticipation of the first required deposit ($40.5
million) to the fund, the Governor included, and the General Assembly
approved, a $30.0 million down payment.
The current biennium started on July 1, 1992 and will end on June 30,
1994. The amended biennial budget appropriated a total of $29,090.6 million:
$6,416.0 million in general funds and $7,907.1 million in nongeneral funds in
fiscal 1993, and $6,852.1 million in general funds and $7,915.3 million in
nongeneral funds in fiscal 1994.
The amended Appropriations Act assumed that general fund revenues would
increase by 7.1 percent in fiscal 1993 and 6.0 percent in fiscal 1994.
Currently, year-to-date general fund growth for the 11 months of fiscal 1993
is 9.7 percent. When general fund revenues are adjusted for one-time corporate
payments, the year-to-date growth declines to 7.9 percent.
The Commonwealth of Virginia maintains ratings of AAA by Standard &
Poor's and Aaa by Moody's on its general obligation indebtedness, reflecting
in part its sound fiscal management, diversified economic base and low debt
ratios. There can be no assurance that these conditions will continue. Nor are
these same conditions necessarily applicable to securities which are not
general obligations of the Commonwealth. Securities issued by specific
municipalities, governmental authorities or similar issuers may be subject to
economic risks or uncertainties peculiar to the issuers of such securities or
the sources from which they are to be paid.
TAX STATUS. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned
on Virginia Quality Trust Units see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
The assets of the Trust will consist of interest-bearing obligations
issued by or on behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Virginia") or
counties, municipalities, authorities or political subdivisions thereof (the
"Bonds").
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the Bonds
to be deposited in and held in the Trust. However, although no opinion is
expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that: (i) the Bonds
were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is excludible from gross income
for federal income tax purposes and (iii) the interest thereon is exempt from
income tax imposed by Virginia that is applicable to individuals and
corporations (the "Virginia Income Tax"). The opinion set forth below does not
address the taxation of persons other than full time residents of Virginia.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, special counsel to the Fund for
Virginia tax matters, under existing law as of the date of this prospectus and
based upon the assumptions set forth above:
(1) The Virginia Quality Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation for purposes of the Virginia Income Tax and each
Unitholder of the Trust will be treated as the owner of a pro rata
portion of the assets held by the Trust and the income of such portion
of the Virginia Quality Trust will be treated as income of the
Unitholder for purposes of the Virginia Income Tax.
(2) Income on the Bonds which is exempt from Virginia Income Tax when
received by the Virginia Quality Trust, and which would be exempt from
Virginia Income Tax if received directly by a Unitholder, will retain
its status as exempt from such tax when received by the Trust and
distributed to such Unitholder.
(3) Each Unitholder will recognize gain or loss for purposes of the
Virginia Income Tax if the Trustee disposes of a bond (whether by
redemption, sale or otherwise) or if the Unitholder redeems or sells
Units of the Trust to the extent that such a transaction results in a
recognized gain or loss to such Unitholder for federal income tax
purposes, except as described in this paragraph. Virginia has by law
provided that all income from certain tax-exempt obligations issued
under the laws of Virginia, including any profits made from the sale
of such Bonds, shall be exempt from all taxation by Virginia. Although
we express no opinion, the Virginia Department of Taxation has
indicated that the gain on the sale of such tax-exempt obligations,
recognized for federal income tax purposes, would not be subject to
Virginia income taxation.
<PAGE>
76 Virginia QUALITY-- Series 61
Accordingly, any such gain relating to the disposition of any Bond
that would not be subject to Virginia Income Tax if the Bond was held
directly by a Unitholder will retain its tax-exempt status for
purposes of the Virginia Income Tax when the Bond is disposed of by
the Virginia Quality Trust or when the Unitholder is deemed to have
disposed of his pro rata portion of such Bond upon the disposition of
his Unit, provided that such gain can be determined with reasonable
certainty and substantiated.
(4) The Virginia Income Tax does not permit a deduction of interest
paid on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry Units
in the Virginia Quality Trust to the extent that interest income
related to the ownership of Units is exempt from the Virginia Income
Tax.
In the case of Unitholders subject to the Virginia Bank Franchise Tax,
the income derived by such a Unitholder from his pro rata portion of the Bonds
held by the Virginia Quality Trust may affect the determination of such
Unitholder's Bank Franchise Tax. Prospective investors subject to the Virginia
Bank Franchise Tax should consult their tax advisors.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PER UNIT INFORMATION:
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL UNIT INCOME:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................................................ $ 57.70
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit.................................................................. $ 2.08
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.62
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS PER UNIT:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................................................ $ 55.62
Divided by 12............................................................................................ $ 4.64
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.......................................................... $ .15452
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN BASED ON PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE <F1><F2><F3>........................................... 5.56%
ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURN <F1><F2><F3>........................................................................ 5.72%
Initial Distribution (October 1994)............................................................................ $ 4.79
ESTIMATED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PER UNIT <F3>.................................................................... $ 4.64
PURCHASED INTEREST <F4>........................................................................................ $ 9.62
Trustee's Annual Fee................... $.98 per $1,000 principal amount of
Bonds
Record and Computation Dates........... FIRST day of each month
DISTRIBUTION DATES..................... FIFTEENTH DAY OF EACH MONTH COMMENCING
OCTOBER 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1> The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F2> The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The
estimated net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in
fees and expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal
prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while
the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in the offering price of
the underlying Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest;
therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Current
Return indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which <F1>takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of,
the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of
premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all
of the Securities in the Trust and <F2>takes into account the expenses
and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values
and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term
Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated
Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and
Public Offering Price.
<F3> These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash
flows will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in
current interest rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, call, exchange or sale of the underlying Securities. The
estimated cash flows for this Series are set forth under "Estimated Cash
Flows to Unitholders".
<F4> See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Virginia QUALITY-- Series 61 77
<TABLE>
VIRGINIA INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST
SERIES 61 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 230)
PORTFOLIO AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
OFFERING
PRICE TO
NAME OF ISSUER, TITLE, INTEREST RATE AND RATING<F2> VIRGINIA
AGGREGATE MATURITY DATE OF EITHER BONDS DEPOSITED OR STANDARD REDEMPTION QUALITY
PRINCIPAL<F1> BONDS CONTRACTED FOR<F1><F5> & POOR'S MOODY'S FEATURE<F3> TRUST<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 100,000 Virginia State Transportation Board, Contract Revenue
Bonds (Northern Virginia Transportation District
Program) Series 1993C 2003 @ 102
#5.50% Due 5/15/2015............................... AA Aa 2013 @ 100 S.F. $ 91,594
300,000 Fairfax County Economic Development Authority
(Virginia) Lease Revenue Bonds (Government Center
Properties)
5.25% Due 11/15/2018............................... AA Aa 2004 @ 102 263,277
400,000 Norfolk, Virginia, Industrial Development Authority,
Hospital Revenue and Refunding Bonds (Sentara
Hospitals-Norfolk) Series 1994A 2004 @ 102
#5.00% Due 11/1/2020............................... AA Aa 2014 @ 100 S.F. 326,104
500,000 Roanoke County, Virginia, Water System Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.00% Due 7/1/2021................................ AAA Aaa 2014 @ 100 S.F. 417,500
500,000 Richmond Metropolitan Authority (Virginia) Expressway
Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A (FGIC
Insured) 2002 @ 100
#5.75% Due 7/15/2022............................... AAA Aaa 2017 @ 100 S.F. 470,275
500,000 Virginia College Building Authority (Virginia)
Educational Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Washington and Lee University) Series 1994
#5.80% Due 1/1/2024................................ AA Aa 2004 @ 102 471,365
500,000 Virginia Housing Development Authority, Commonwealth
Mortgage Bonds, Series 1993H (AMBAC Indemnity
Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.25% Due 7/1/2027................................ AAA Aaa 2024 @ 100 S.F. 423,960
400,000 Loudoun County Sanitation Authority (Virginia) Water
and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series
1992 (FGIC Insured) 2003 @ 100
#6.25% Due 1/1/2030................................ AAA Aaa 2017 @ 100 S.F. 396,348
$ 3,200,000 $ 2,860,423
</TABLE>
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
<PAGE>
78 Notes to Portfolios
NOTES TO PORTFOLIOS:
AS OF THE DATE OF DEPOSIT: AUGUST 24, 1994
(1) All Securities are represented by "regular way" or "when issued"
contracts for the performance of which an irrevocable letter of credit,
obtained from an affiliate of the Trustee, has been deposited with the
Trustee. At the Date of Deposit, Securities may have been delivered to
the Sponsor pursuant to certain of these contracts; the Sponsor has
assigned to the Trustee all of its right, title and interest in and to
such Securities. Contracts to acquire Securities were entered into during
the period from July 25, 1994 to August 23, 1994. These Securities have
expected settlement dates ranging from August 24, 1994 to September 8,
1994 (see "Unitholder Explanations").
(2) All ratings are by Standard & Poor's Corporation unless otherwise
indicated. "*" indicates that the rating of the Bond is by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. The ratings represent the latest published
ratings by the respective ratings agency or, if not published, represent
private letter ratings or those ratings expected to be published by the
respective ratings agency. "Y" indicates that such rating is contingent
upon physical receipt by the respective ratings agency of a policy of
insurance obtained by the issuer of the bonds involved and issued by the
Preinsured Bond Insurer named in the bond's title. A commitment for
insurance in connection with these bonds has been issued by the
Preinsured Bond Insurer named in the bond's title. "N/R" indicates that
the applicable rating service did not provide a rating for that
particular Security. For a brief description of the rating symbols and
their related meanings, see "Other Matters-- Description of Securities
Ratings".
(3) There is shown under this heading the year in which each issue of Bonds
is initially or currently callable and the call price for that year. Each
issue of Bonds continues to be callable at declining prices thereafter
(but not below par value) except for original issue discount bonds which
are redeemable at prices based on the issue price plus the amount of
original issue discount accreted to redemption date plus, if applicable,
some premium, the amount of which will decline in subsequent years.
"S.F." indicates a sinking fund is established with respect to an issue
of Bonds. Redemption pursuant to call provisions generally will, and
redemption pursuant to sinking fund provisions may, occur at times when
the redeemed bonds have an offering side valuation which represents a
premium over par. Certain Bonds may be subject to redemption without
premium prior to the date shown pursuant to extraordinary optional or
mandatory redemptions if certain events occur. Single family mortgage
revenue bonds and housing authority bonds are most likely to be called
subject to such provisions, but other bonds may have similar call
features. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, certain bond
issuers have in the past and others may in the future attempt to redeem
Bonds prior to their initially scheduled call dates and at prices which
do not include any premiums. For a general discussion of certain of these
events, see "Unitholder Explanations--Bond Redemptions". To the extent
that the Securities were deposited in a Trust at a price higher than the
price at which they are redeemed, this will represent a loss of capital
when compared with the original Public Offering Price of the Units.
Conversely, to the extent that the Bonds were acquired at a price lower
than the redemption price, this will represent an increase in capital
when compared with the original Public Offering Price of the Units.
Distributions will generally be reduced by the amount of the income which
would otherwise have been paid with respect to redeemed Securities and
there will be distributed to Unitholders the principal amount and any
premium received on such redemption. The Estimated Current Return and
Estimated Long-Term Return in this event may be affected by such
redemptions. For the Federal tax effect on Unitholders of such
redemptions and resultant distributions, see paragraph (2) under "Other
Matters--Federal Tax Status".
(4) Evaluation of Securities is made on the basis of current offering prices
for the Securities. The offering prices are greater than the current bid
prices of the Securities which is the basis on which Unit value is
determined for purposes of redemption of Units (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price").
<PAGE>
Notes to Portfolios 79
(5) Other information regarding the Bonds in each Trust, as of the Date of
Deposit, is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL PROFIT
INSURANCE COST TO (LOSS) TO ANNUAL INTEREST BID SIDE EVALUATION
TRUST COST SPONSOR SPONSOR INCOME TO TRUST OF BONDS
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT Short Intermediate.............. $ 650 $ 6,900,883 $ 22,632 $ 327,410 $ 6,870,638
IM-IT Limited Maturity................ -- $ 4,811,144 $ 31,948 $ 285,711 $ 4,804,300
California IM-IT...................... -- $ 2,860,088 $ 21,500 $ 179,013 $ 2,858,538
Florida IM-IT......................... -- $ 2,843,794 $ 15,722 $ 174,963 $ 2,835,988
Michigan IM-IT........................ -- $ 2,890,907 $ 24,133 $ 178,656 $ 2,891,106
New York IM-IT........................ $ 400 $ 2,847,484 $ 21,265 $ 176,738 $ 2,846,288
Hawaii Quality........................ -- $ 2,944,509 $ 52,909 $ 180,893 $ 2,973,813
Oregon Quality........................ -- $ 3,020,955 $ 26,363 $ 184,075 $ 3,023,363
Virginia Quality...................... -- $ 2,842,486 $ 17,937 $ 175,250 $ 2,835,875
</TABLE>
The Sponsor may have entered into contracts which hedge interest rate
fluctuations on certain Bonds in certain Portfolios. The cost of any such
contracts and the corresponding gain or loss is included in the Cost to
Sponsor.
Certain Securities in the Fund, if any, marked by a double asterisk (**),
have been purchased on a "when, as and if issued" or "delayed delivery"
basis. Interest on these Securities begins accruing to the benefit of
Unitholders on their respective dates of delivery. Delivery is expected
to take place at various dates after the First Settlement Date as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF
AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL RANGE OF DAYS SUBSEQUENT
TRUST AMOUNT TO FIRST SETTLEMENT DATE
<S> <C> <C>
IM-IT Short Intermediate............ 33% 1 to 7 days
IM-IT Limited Maturity.............. 5% 8 days
California IM-IT.................... 0% --
Florida IM-IT....................... 0% --
Michigan IM-IT...................... 0% --
New York IM-IT...................... 0% --
Hawaii Quality...................... 0% --
Oregon Quality...................... 0% --
Virginia Quality.................... 0% --
</TABLE>
On the Date of Deposit, the offering side evaluations of the Securities
in the IM-IT Short Intermediate, IM-IT Limited Maturity, California
IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT, Hawaii Quality,
Oregon Quality and Virginia Quality Trusts were higher than the bid side
evaluations of such Securities by 0.75%, 0.78%, 0.75%, 0.77%, 0.76%,
0.75%, 0.77%, 0.77% and 0.77%, respectively, of the aggregate principal
amounts of such Securities.
"#" indicates that such Bond was issued at an original issue discount.
The tax effect of Bonds issued at an original issue discount is described
in "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
(6) This Bond has been purchased at a deep discount from the par value
because there is little or no stated interest income thereon. Bonds which
pay no interest are normally described as "zero coupon" bonds. Over the
life of bonds purchased at a deep discount the value of such bonds will
increase such that upon maturity the holders of such bonds will receive
100% of the principal amount thereof. Approximately 7% of the aggregate
principal amount of the Securities in the IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust
are "zero coupon" bonds.
<PAGE>
80 Underwriting
UNDERWRITING. The Underwriters named below have severally purchased Units
in the following respective amounts from the Sponsor.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IM-IT SHORT
INTERMEDIATE
NAME ADDRESS TRUST UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 5,415
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 250
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 250
Southwest Securities Inc. 1201 Elm Street, Suite 4300, Dallas, Texas 75270 250
Fidelity Capital Markets 161 Devonshire Street D4, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 100
A Division of National Financial
Services
Corporation
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
J. J. B. Hilliard, W. L. Lyons, Inc. 501 South Fourth Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Kemper Securities, Inc. 77 West Wacker Drive, 28th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601 100
Nathan & Lewis Securities, Inc. 119 West 40th Street, New York, New York 10018 100
7,015
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IM-IT LIMITED
MATURITY TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 3,900
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 250
Southwest Securities Inc. 1201 Elm Street, Suite 4300, Dallas, Texas 75270 250
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Kemper Securities, Inc. 77 West Wacker Drive, 28th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601 100
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 100
5,000
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CALIFORNIA
IM-IT TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 1,953
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 250
Crowell, Weedon & Company One Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90017 200
Fidelity Capital Markets 161 Devonshire Street D4, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 100
A Division of National Financial
Services
Corporation
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 100
3,053
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Underwriting 81
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FLORIDA
IM-IT TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,236
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 250
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 250
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
First of Michigan Corporation 100 Renaissance Center, 26th Floor, Detroit, Michigan 48243 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
3,036
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MICHIGAN
IM-IT TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 1,095
First of Michigan Corporation 100 Renaissance Center, 26th Floor, Detroit, Michigan 48243 700
Roney & Co. One Griswold, Detroit, Michigan 48226 650
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 250
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 100
3,095
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NEW YORK
IM-IT TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,196
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
First Investors Corporation 95 Wall Street, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10005 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Advest, Inc. 280 Trumbull Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 100
Roosevelt & Cross Inc. 20 Exchange Place, New York, New York 10005 100
3,046
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HAWAII
QUALITY TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,632
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 100
Smith Barney Inc. 2 World Trade Center, 101st Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
3,182
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
82 Underwriting
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OREGON
QUALITY TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,635
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 100
Smith Barney Inc. 2 World Trade Center, 101st Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
3,235
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VIRGINIA
QUALITY TRUST
NAME ADDRESS UNITS
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,087
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
Branch Cabell & Co. 919 East Main, 17th Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219 100
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York, New York
Unit Investment Trust Department 10292 100
Smith Barney Inc. 2 World Trade Center, 101st Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Wheat, First Securities, Inc. River Front Plaza, 901 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia
23219 100
3,037
</TABLE>
Units may also be sold to broker-dealers and others at prices
representing the per Unit concession or agency commission stated under "Trust
Administration--General--Unit Distribution". However, resales of Units by such
broker-dealers and others to the public will be made at the Public Offering
Price described in the Prospectus. The Sponsor reserves the right to reject,
in whole or in part, any order for the purchase of Units and the right to
change the amount of the concession or agency commission from time to time.
In addition to any other benefits the Underwriters may realize from the
sale of the Units of the Fund, the Agreement Among Underwriters provides that
the Sponsor will share on a pro rata basis among those Underwriters who
underwrite at least 250 Units 50% of the aggregate gain, if any, represented
by the difference between the Sponsor's cost of the Securities in connection
with their acquisition and the evaluation thereof on the Date of Deposit less
deductions for certain accrued interest and certain other costs. See "Trust
Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation" and "Portfolio"
for the applicable Trust.
Underwriters and broker-dealers of the Trusts, banks and/or others are
eligible to participate in a program in which such firms receive from the
Sponsor a nominal award for each of their representatives who have sold a
minimum number of units of unit investment trusts created by the Sponsor
during a specified time period. In addition, at various times the Sponsor may
implement other programs under which the sales forces of Underwriters,
brokers, dealers, banks and/or others may be eligible to win other nominal
awards for certain sales efforts, or under which the Sponsor will reallow to
any such Underwriters, brokers, dealers, banks and/or others that sponsor
sales contests or recognition programs conforming to criteria established by
the Sponsor, or participate in sales programs sponsored by the Sponsor, an
amount not exceeding the total applicable sales charges on the sales generated
by such persons at the public offering price during such programs. Also, the
Sponsor in its discretion may from time to time pursuant to objective criteria
established by the Sponsor pay fees to qualifying underwriters, brokers,
dealers, banks or others for certain services or activities which are
primarily intended to result in sales of Units of the Trusts. Such payments
are made by the Sponsor out of its own assets, and not out of the assets of
the Trusts. These programs will not change the price Unitholders pay for their
Units or the amount that the Trusts will receive from the Units sold.
Approximately every eighteen months the Sponsor holds a business seminar which
is open to Underwriters that sell units of trusts it sponsors. The Sponsor
pays substantially all costs associated with the seminar, excluding
Underwriter travel costs. Each Underwriter is invited to send a certain number
of representatives based on the gross number of units such firm underwrites
during a designated time period.
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 83
FUND ADMINISTRATION AND EXPENSES
SPONSOR. Van Kampen Merritt Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the Sponsor
of the Trust. Van Kampen Merritt Inc. is primarily owned by Clayton, Dubilier
& Rice, Inc., a New York-based private investment firm. Van Kampen Merritt
Inc. management owns a significant minority equity position. Van Kampen
Merritt Inc. specializes in the underwriting and distribution of unit
investment trusts and mutual funds. The Sponsor is a member of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and has its principal office at One
Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, (708) 684-6000. It maintains
a branch office in Philadelphia and has regional representatives in Atlanta,
Dallas, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Tampa. As of
December 31, 1993 the total stockholders' equity of Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
was $122,167,000 (audited). (This paragraph relates only to the Sponsor and
not to the Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt
Trust or to any Multi-Series thereof or to any other Underwriter. The
information is included herein only for the purpose of informing investors as
to the financial responsibility of the Sponsor and its ability to carry out
its contractual obligations. More detailed financial information will be made
available by the Sponsor upon request.)
As of March 31, 1994, the Sponsor and its affiliates managed or
supervised approximately $36.5 billion of investment products, of which over
$24 billion is invested in municipal securities. The Sponsor and its
affiliates managed $22.5 billion of assets, consisting of $8.2 billion for 21
open end mutual funds, $8.0 billion for 34 closed-end funds and $6.3 billion
for 51 institutional accounts. The Sponsor has also deposited approximately
$24 billion of unit investment trusts. Based on cumulative assets deposited,
the Sponsor believes that it is the largest sponsor of insured municipal unit
investment trusts, primarily through the success of its Insured Municipal
Income Trust(R) or the IM-IT(R) trust. The Sponsor also provides surveillance
and evaluation services at cost for approximately $14 billion of unit
investment trust assets outstanding. Since 1976, the Sponsor has serviced over
one million retail investor accounts, opened through retail distribution
firms. Van Kampen Merritt Inc. is the sponsor of the various series of the
trusts listed below and the distributor of the mutual funds and closed-end
funds listed below. Unitholders may only invest in the trusts, mutual funds
and closed-end funds which are registered for sale in the state of residence
of such Unitholder. In order for a Unitholder to invest in the trusts, mutual
funds and closed-end funds listed below, such Unitholder must obtain a
prospectus relating to the trust or fund involved. A prospectus is the only
means by which an offer can be delivered to investors.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF TRUST TRUST INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
<S> <C>
Insured Municipals Income Trust................ Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities
California Insured Municipals Income Trust..... Double tax-exemption for California residents by investing in insured
California municipal securities
New York Insured Municipals Income Trust....... Double and in certain cases triple tax-exemption for New York residents
by investing in insured New York municipal securities
Pennsylvania Insured Municipals Income Trust... Double and in certain cases triple tax-exemption for Pennsylvania
residents by investing in insured Pennsylvania municipal securities
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Insured Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities; all
Multi-Series................................. issuers of bonds in a state trust are located in such state or in
(Premium Bond Series, National, Limited territories or possessions of the United States-- providing
Maturity, Intermediate, Short Intermediate, exemptions from all state income tax for residents of such state
Discount, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, (except for the Oklahoma IM-IT Trust where a portion of the income of
California, California Intermediate, the Trust is subject to the Oklahoma state income tax)
California Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
California Premium, Colorado, Connecticut,
Florida, Florida Intermediate, Florida
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, Georgia,
Louisiana, Massachusetts, Massachusetts
Premium, Michigan, Michigan Intermediate,
Michigan Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
Michigan Premium, Minnesota, Missouri,
Missouri Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
Missouri Premium, New Jersey, New Jersey
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, New Mexico,
New York, New York Intermediate, New York
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, New York
Limited Maturity, Ohio, Ohio Intermediate,
Ohio IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
Ohio Premium, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
Pennsylvania Intermediate, Pennsylvania
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, Pennsylvania
Premium, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, West
Virginia)
Insured Tax Free Bond Trust.................... Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities
Insured Tax Free Bond Trust, Insured Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal securities; all
Multi-Series................................. issuers of bonds in a state trust are located in such state--providing
(National, Limited Maturity, New York) exemptions from state income tax for residents of such state
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
84 Trust Administration
NAME OF TRUST TRUST INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE (Continued)
<S> <C>
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust............ Tax-exempt income by investing in municipal securities
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Tax-exempt income by investing in municipal securities; all issuers of
Multi-Series................................. bonds in a state trust are located in such state or in territories or
(National, National AMT, Intermediate, possessions of the United States--providing exemptions from state
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, income tax for residents of such state
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Virginia)
Investors' Quality Municipals Trust, AMT Tax-exempt income for investors not subject to the alternative minimum
Series....................................... tax by investing in municipal securities, some or all of which are
subject to the Federal alternative minimum tax
Investors' Corporate Income Trust.............. Taxable income by investing in corporate bonds
Investors' Governmental Securities--Income Taxable income by investing in government-backed GNMA securities
Trust........................................
Van Kampen Merritt International Bond Income High current income through an investment in a diversified portfolio of
Trust........................................ foreign currency denominated corporate debt obligations
Van Kampen Merritt Insured Income Trust........ High current income consistent with preservation of capital through a
diversified investment in a fixed portfolio of insured, long-term or
intermediate-term corporate debt securities
Van Kampen Merritt Utility Income Trust........ High dividend income and capital appreciation by investing in common
stock of electric utilities
Van Kampen Merritt Blue Chip Opportunity Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income by investing
Trust........................................ in a portfolio of actively traded, New York Stock Exchange listed
equity securities which are components of the Dow Jones Industrial
Average*
Van Kampen Merritt Blue Chip Opportunity and Protect Unitholders' capital and provide the potential for capital
Treasury Trust............................... appreciation and income by investing a portion of its portfolio in
"zero coupon" U.S. Treasury obligations and the remainder of the
trust's portfolio in actively traded, New York Stock Exchange listed
equity securities which at the time of the creation of the trust were
components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average*
Van Kampen Merritt Emerging Markets Income High current income consistent with preservation of capital through a
Trust........................................ diversified investment in a fixed portfolio primarily consisting of
Brady Bonds of emerging market countries that have restructured
sovereign debt pursuant to the framework of the Brady Plan
Van Kampen Merritt Global Telecommunications Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income consistent
Trust........................................ with the preservation of invested capital, by investing in a portfolio
of equity securities which provide equipment for or services to the
telecommunications industry
Van Kampen Merritt Global Energy Trust......... Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income consistent
with the preservation of invested capital, by investing in a portfolio
of equity securities diversified within the energy industry
Strategic Ten Trust............................ Provide an above average total return through a combination of
(United States, United Kingdom, and Hong Kong potential capital appreciation and dividend income, consistent with
Portfolios) preservation of invested capital, by investing in a portfolio of
common stocks of the ten companies in a recognized stock exchange
index having the highest dividend yields
Van Kampen Merritt Brand Name Equity Trust..... Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income consistent
with the preservation of invested capital, by investing in a portfolio
of equity securities diversified within the non-durable consumer
products industry
NAME OF MUTUAL FUND FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
Van Kampen Merritt U.S. Government Fund........ High current income by investing in U.S. Government securities
Van Kampen Merritt Insured Tax Free Income High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in
Fund.......................................... insured municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Income Fund....... High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free High Income Fund... High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in
medium and lower grade municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt California Insured Tax Free High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes by
Fund.......................................... investing in insured California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt High Yield Fund............. Provide a high level of current income by investing in medium and lower
grade domestic and foreign government and corporate debt securities.
The Fund will seek capital appreciation as a secondary objective
Van Kampen Merritt Growth and Income Fund...... Long-term growth of both capital and dividend income by investing in
dividend paying common stocks
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Tax Free Income High current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania state and
Fund.......................................... local income taxes by investing in medium and lower grade Pennsylvania
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Money Market Fund........... High current income by investing in a broad range of money market
instruments that will mature within twelve months
Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free Money Fund......... High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in a
broad range of municipal securities that will mature within twelve
months
</TABLE>
* The Dow Jones Industrial Average is the property of Dow Jones & Company,
Inc. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. has not granted to the Trust or the Sponsor a
license to use the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Trust Administration 85
NAME OF MUTUAL FUND FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE (Continued)
<S> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Short-Term Global Income High current income by investing in a global portfolio of high quality
Fund.......................................... debt securities denominated in various currencies having remaining
maturities of not more than three years
Van Kampen Merritt Adjustable Rate U.S. High level of current income with a relatively stable net asset value
Government Fund............................... investing in U.S. Government securities
Van Kampen Merritt Limited Term Municipal High level of current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent
Income Fund................................... with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Utility Fund................ Provide capital appreciation and current income by investing in a
diversified portfolio of common stocks and income securities issued by
companies engaged in the utilities industry
Van Kampen Merritt Strategic Income Fund....... Provide shareholders with high current income. The Fund will seek
capital appreciation as a secondary objective
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF CLOSED-END FUND FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
<S> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Income Trust...... High current income exempt from Federal income taxes with safety of
principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of investment grade
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt California Municipal High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes
Trust......................................... with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Intermediate Term High High current income while seeking to preserve shareholders' capital by
Income Trust.................................. investing in a diversified portfolio of high yield fixed income
securities
Van Kampen Merritt Limited Term High Income High current income while seeking to preserve shareholders' capital by
Trust......................................... investing in a diversified portfolio of high yield fixed income
securities
Van Kampen Merritt Prime Rate Income Trust..... High current income, consistent with preservation of capital by
investing in interests in floating or variable rate senior loans
Van Kampen Merritt Investment Grade Municipal High current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent with
Trust......................................... preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Trust............. High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt California Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes
Trust......................................... with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Florida Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal income taxes and Florida
Trust......................................... intangible personal property taxes with safety of principal by
investing in a diversified portfolio of investment grade Florida
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt New York Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal as well as New York State and
Trust......................................... New York City income taxes with safety of principal by investing in a
diversified portfolio of investment grade New York municipal
securities
Van Kampen Merritt Ohio Quality Municipal High current income exempt from Federal and Ohio income taxes with
Trust......................................... safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade Ohio municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Quality High current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania income taxes
Municipal Trust............................... with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
investment grade Pennsylvania municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Municipals.................................... with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Insured High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Municipals.................................... with preservation of capital by investing in a diversified portfolio of
municipal securities which are covered by insurance with respect to
timely payment of principal and interest
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal and California income
CA Municipals................................. taxes, consistent with preservation of capital by investing in a
diversified portfolio of California municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes,
FL Municipals................................. consistent with preservation of capital. The Fund also seeks to offer
its Shareholders the opportunity to own securities exempt from Florida
intangible personal property taxes
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and New
NJ Municipals................................. Jersey gross income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal as well as from New
NY Municipals................................. York State and New York City income taxes, consistent with
preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
PA Municipals................................. income taxes and, where possible under local law, local income and
property taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Opportunity High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Trust......................................... with preservation of capital by investing in a diversified portfolio of
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Municipal Income High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Trust......................................... with preservation of capital by investing in a diversified portfolio of
municipal securities
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Pennsylvania High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
Municipal Income Trust........................ income taxes and, where possible under local law, local income and
property taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Strategic Sector Municipal Provide common shareholders with a high level of current income exempt
Trust......................................... from Federal income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Value Municipal Income High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes,
Trust......................................... consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt California Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal and California income
Income Trust.................................. taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Massachusetts Value High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and
Municipal Income Trust........................ Massachusetts personal income taxes, consistent with preservation of
capital
Van Kampen Merritt New Jersey Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and New
Income Trust.................................. Jersey gross income tax, consistent with preservation of capital
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
86 Trust Administration
NAME OF CLOSED-END FUND FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE (Continued)
<S> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt New York Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal as well as New York
Income Trust.................................. State and New York City income taxes, consistent with preservation of
capital
Van Kampen Merritt Ohio Value Municipal Income High level of current income exempt from Federal and Ohio income taxes,
Trust......................................... consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
Income Trust.................................. income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Opportunity Trust High level of current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent
II............................................ with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Florida Municipal High level of current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent
Opportunity Trust............................. with preservation of capital. The Fund seeks to offer its common
shareholders the opportunity to own securities exempt from Florida
intangible personal property taxes
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Municipal Income Provide common shareholders with a high level of current income exempt
Trust II...................................... from federal income tax, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Select Sector Municipal To provide common shareholders with a high level of current income
Trust......................................... exempt from federal income tax, consistent with preservation of capital
</TABLE>
If the Sponsor shall fail to perform any of its duties under the Trust
Agreement or become incapable of acting or become bankrupt or its affairs are
taken over by public authorities, then the Trustee may (i) appoint a successor
Sponsor at rates of compensation deemed by the Trustee to be reasonable and
not exceeding amounts prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
(ii) terminate the Trust Agreement and liquidate the Fund as provided therein
or (iii) continue to act as Trustee without terminating the Trust Agreement.
All costs and expenses incurred in creating and establishing the Fund,
including the cost of the initial preparation, printing and execution of the
Trust Agreement and the certificates, legal and accounting expenses,
advertising and selling expenses, expenses of the Trustee, initial evaluation
fees and other out-of-pocket expenses have been borne by the Sponsor at no
cost to the Fund.
COMPENSATION OF SPONSOR AND EVALUATOR. The Sponsor will not receive any
fees in connection with its activities relating to the Fund. However, American
Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment
Advisory Corp., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation of the Sponsor,
will receive an annual supervisory fee as indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information" for providing portfolio supervisory services
for the Fund. Such fee (which is based on the number of Units outstanding in
each Trust on January 1 of each year) may exceed the actual costs of providing
such supervisory services for this Fund, but at no time will the total amount
received for portfolio supervisory services rendered to Insured Municipals
Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 1 and
subsequent series and to any other unit investment trusts sponsored by the
Sponsor for which the Evaluator provides portfolio supervisory services in any
calendar year exceed the aggregate cost to the Evaluator of supplying such
services in such year. In addition, the Evaluator shall receive an annual
evaluation fee as indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information"
for regularly evaluating each Trust's portfolio. Both of the foregoing fees
may be increased without approval of the Unitholders by amounts not exceeding
proportionate increases under the category "All Services Less Rent of Shelter"
in the Consumer Price Index published by the United States Department of Labor
or, if such category is no longer published, in a comparable category. The
Sponsor and the Underwriters will receive sales commissions and may realize
other profits (or losses) in connection with the sale of Units and the deposit
of the Securities as described under "General--Sponsor and Underwriter
Compensation" below.
TRUSTEE. The Trustee is The Bank of New York, a trust company organized
under the laws of New York. The Bank of New York has its offices at 101
Barclay Street, New York, New York 10286 (800) 221-7668. The Bank of New York
is subject to supervision and examination by the Superintendent of Banks of
the State of New York and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation to the extent permitted by law.
The duties of the Trustee are primarily ministerial in nature. It did not
participate in the selection of Bonds for the portfolios of any of the Trusts.
In accordance with the Trust Agreement, the Trustee shall keep proper
books of record and account of all transactions at its office for the Fund.
Such records shall include the name and address of, and the certificates
issued by the Fund to, every Unitholder of the Fund. Such books and records
shall be open to inspection by any Unitholder at all reasonable times during
the usual business hours. The Trustee shall make such annual or other reports
as may from time to time be required under any applicable state or Federal
statute, rule or regulation (see "Unitholder
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 87
Explanations--Public Offering--Reports Provided"). The Trustee is required to
keep a certified copy or duplicate original of the Trust Agreement on file in
its office available for inspection at all reasonable times during the usual
business hours by any Unitholder, together with a current list of the
Securities held in the Fund.
Under the Trust Agreement, the Trustee or any successor trustee may
resign and be discharged of the trusts created by the Trust Agreement by
executing an instrument in writing and filing the same with the Sponsor. The
Trustee or successor trustee must mail a copy of the notice of resignation to
all Fund Unitholders then of record, not less than 60 days before the date
specified in such notice when such resignation is to take effect. The Sponsor
upon receiving notice of such resignation is obligated to appoint a successor
trustee promptly. If, upon such resignation, no successor trustee has been
appointed and has accepted the appointment within 30 days after notification,
the retiring Trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the
appointment of a successor. The Sponsor may remove the Trustee and appoint a
successor trustee as provided in the Trust Agreement at any time with or
without cause. Notice of such removal and appointment shall be mailed to each
Unitholder by the Sponsor. Upon execution of a written acceptance of such
appointment by such successor trustee, all the rights, powers, duties and
obligations of the original trustee shall vest in the successor. The
resignation or removal of a Trustee becomes effective only when the successor
trustee accepts its appointment as such or when a court of competent
jurisdiction appoints a successor trustee.
Any corporation into which a Trustee may be merged or with which it may
be consolidated, or any corporation resulting from any merger or consolidation
to which a Trustee shall be a party, shall be the successor trustee. The
Trustee must be a banking corporation organized under the laws of the United
States or any state and having at all times an aggregate capital, surplus and
undivided profits of not less than $5,000,000.
TRUSTEE'S FEE. For its services the Trustee will receive a fee based on
the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Securities in each Trust as of
the opening of business on January 2 and July 2 of each year as set forth
under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust. During the first year
the Trustee may agree to reduce its fee (and to the extent necessary pay
miscellaneous expenses of a Trust) as stated under "Per Unit Information" for
the applicable Trust. The Trustee's fees are payable monthly on or before the
fifteenth day of each month from the Interest Account of each Trust to the
extent funds are available and then from the Principal Account of each Trust,
with such payments being based on each Trust's portion of such expenses. Since
the Trustee has the use of the funds being held in the Principal and Interest
Accounts for future distributions, payment of expenses and redemptions and
since such Accounts are non-interest bearing to Unitholders, the Trustee
benefits thereby. Part of the Trustee's compensation for its services to each
Trust is expected to result from the use of these funds. Such fees may be
increased without approval of the Unitholders by amounts not exceeding
proportionate increases under the category "All Services Less Rent of Shelter"
in the Consumer Price Index published by the United States Department of Labor
or, if such category is no longer published, in a comparable category. The
Trustee's fees will not be increased in future years in order to make up any
reduction in the Trustee's fees described under "Per Unit Information" for the
applicable Trust. For a discussion of the services rendered by the Trustee
pursuant to its obligations under the Trust Agreement, see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Reports Provided" and "Trustee" above.
PORTFOLIO ADMINISTRATION. The Trustee is empowered to sell, for the
purpose of redeeming Units tendered by any Unitholder, and for the payment of
expenses for which funds may not be available, such of the Bonds designated by
the Evaluator as the Trustee in its sole discretion may deem necessary. The
Evaluator, in designating such Securities, will consider a variety of factors,
including (a) interest rates, (b) market value and (c) marketability. The
Sponsor, in connection with the Quality Trusts, may direct the Trustee to
dispose of Securities upon default in payment of principal or interest,
institution of certain legal proceedings, default under other documents
adversely affecting debt service, default in payment of principal or interest
on other obligations of the same issuer, decline in projected income pledged
for debt service on revenue bonds or decline in price or the occurrence of
other market or credit factors, including advance refunding (i.e., the
issuance of refunding securities and the deposit of the proceeds thereof in
trust or escrow to retire the refunded securities on their respective
redemption dates), so that in the opinion of the Sponsor the retention of such
Securities would be detrimental to the interest of the Unitholders. In
connection with the Insured Trusts to the extent that Bonds are sold which are
current in payment of principal and interest in order to meet redemption
requests and defaulted Bonds are retained in the portfolio in order to
preserve the related insurance protection applicable to said Bonds, the
overall quality of the Bonds remaining in such Trust's portfolio will tend to
diminish. Except as described in this section and in certain other unusual
circumstances for which it is
<PAGE>
88 Trust Administration
determined by the Trustee to be in the best interests of the Unitholders or if
there is no alternative, the Trustee is not empowered to sell Bonds from an
Insured Trust which are in default in payment of principal or interest or in
significant risk of such default and for which value has been attributed for
the insurance obtained by such Insured Trust. Because of such restrictions on
the Trustee under certain circumstances, the Sponsor may seek a full or
partial suspension of the right of Unitholders to redeem their Units in an
Insured Trust. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering-- Redemption of
Units". The Sponsor is empowered, but not obligated, to direct the Trustee to
dispose of Bonds in the event of an advanced refunding.
The Sponsor is required to instruct the Trustee to reject any offer made
by an issuer of any of the Securities to issue new obligations in exchange or
substitution for any Security pursuant to a refunding or refinancing plan,
except that the Sponsor may instruct the Trustee to accept or reject such an
offer or to take any other action with respect thereto as the Sponsor may deem
proper if (1) the issuer is in default with respect to such Security or (2) in
the written opinion of the Sponsor the issuer will probably default with
respect to such Security in the reasonably foreseeable future. Any obligation
so received in exchange or substitution will be held by the Trustee subject to
the terms and conditions of the Trust Agreement to the same extent as
Securities originally deposited thereunder. Within five days after the deposit
of obligations in exchange or substitution for underlying Securities, the
Trustee is required to give notice thereof to each Unitholder of the Trust
thereby affected, identifying the Securities eliminated and the Securities
substituted therefor. Except as stated herein and under "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts" regarding the substitution of
Replacement Bonds for Failed Bonds, the acquisition by the Fund of any
securities other than the Securities initially deposited is not permitted.
If any default in the payment of principal or interest on any Security
occurs and no provision for payment is made therefor within 30 days, the
Trustee is required to notify the Sponsor thereof. If the Sponsor fails to
instruct the Trustee to sell or to hold such Security within 30 days after
notification by the Trustee to the Sponsor of such default, the Trustee may in
its discretion sell the defaulted Security and not be liable for any
depreciation or loss thereby incurred.
SPONSOR PURCHASES OF UNITS. The Trustee shall notify the Sponsor of any
tender of Units for redemption. If the Sponsor's bid in the secondary market
at that time equals or exceeds the Redemption Price per Unit, it may purchase
such Units by notifying the Trustee before the close of business on the second
succeeding business day and by making payment therefor to the Unitholder not
later than the day on which the Units would otherwise have been redeemed by
the Trustee. Units held by the Sponsor may be tendered to the Trustee for
redemption as any other Units.
The offering price of any Units acquired by the Sponsor will be in accord
with the Public Offering Price described in the then currently effective
prospectus describing such Units. Any profit resulting from the resale of such
Units will belong to the Sponsor which likewise will bear any loss resulting
from a lower offering or Redemption Price subsequent to its acquisition of
such Units.
INSURANCE PREMIUMS. The cost of the portfolio insurance obtained by the
respective Trusts, if any, is that amount shown in footnote (5) in "Notes to
Portfolios", so long as such Trust retains the Bonds. Premiums, which are
obligations of each Insured Trust, are payable monthly by the Trustee on
behalf of the respective Trust. As Bonds in the portfolio of an Insured Trust
are redeemed by their respective issuers or are sold by the Trustee, the
amount of the premium will be reduced in respect of those Bonds no longer
owned by and held in such Trust. If the Trustee exercises the right to obtain
permanent insurance, the premiums payable for such permanent insurance will be
paid solely from the proceeds of the sale of the related Bonds. The premiums
for such permanent insurance with respect to each Bond will decline over the
life of the Bond. A Trust does not incur any expense for Preinsured Bond
insurance, since the premium or premiums for such insurance have been paid by
the issuer or the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Preinsured Bonds in a
Trust. Preinsured Bonds are not additionally insured by an Insured Trust.
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES. The following additional charges are or may be
incurred by the Trusts: (a) fees of the Trustee for extraordinary services,
(b) expenses of the Trustee (including legal and auditing expenses) and of
counsel designated by the Sponsor, (c) various governmental charges, (d)
expenses and costs of any action taken by the Trustee to protect the Trusts
and the rights and interests of Unitholders, (e) indemnification of the
Trustee for any loss, liability or expenses incurred by it in the
administration of the Fund without negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct
on its part, (f) any special custodial fees payable in connection with the
sale of any of the Bonds in a Trust and (g) expenditures incurred in
contacting Unitholders upon termination of the Trusts.
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 89
The fees and expenses set forth herein are payable out of the Trusts.
When such fees and expenses are paid by or owing to the Trustee, they are
secured by a lien on the portfolio or portfolios of the applicable Trust or
Trusts. If the balances in the Interest and Principal Accounts are
insufficient to provide for amounts payable by the Fund, the Trustee has the
power to sell Securities to pay such amounts.
GENERAL
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION. The Sponsor and the Trustee have the power to
amend the Trust Agreement without the consent of any of the Unitholders when
such an amendment is (a) to cure an ambiguity or to correct or supplement any
provision of the Trust Agreement which may be defective or inconsistent with
any other provision contained therein or (b) to make such other provisions as
shall not adversely affect the interest of the Unitholders (as determined in
good faith by the Sponsor and the Trustee), provided that the Trust Agreement
may not be amended to increase the number of Units issuable thereunder or to
permit the deposit or acquisition of securities either in addition to or in
substitution for any of the Securities initially deposited in the Fund, except
for the substitution of certain refunding securities for such Securities. In
the event of any amendment, the Trustee is obligated to notify promptly all
Unitholders of the substance of such amendment.
A Trust may be terminated at any time by consent of Unitholders of 51% of
the Units of such Trust then outstanding or by the Trustee when the value of
such Trust, as shown by any semi-annual evaluation, is less than that
indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information". A Trust will be
liquidated by the Trustee in the event that a sufficient number of Units not
yet sold are tendered for redemption by the Underwriters, including the
Sponsor, so that the net worth of such Trust would be reduced to less than 40%
of the initial principal amount of such Trust. If a Trust is liquidated
because of the redemption of unsold Units by the Underwriters, the Sponsor
will refund to each purchaser of Units the entire sales charge paid by such
purchaser. The Trust Agreement provides that each Trust shall terminate upon
the redemption, sale or other disposition of the last Security held in such
Trust, but in no event shall it continue beyond the end of the year preceding
the fiftieth anniversary of the Trust Agreement in the case of a State Trust,
or beyond the end of the year preceding the twentieth anniversary of the Trust
Agreement in the case of an IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate and
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust. In the event of termination of the Fund or any
Trust, written notice thereof will be sent by the Trustee to each Unitholder
of such Trust at his address appearing on the registration books of the Fund
maintained by the Trustee. Within a reasonable time thereafter the Trustee
shall liquidate any Securities then held in such Trust and shall deduct from
the funds of such Trust any accrued costs, expenses or indemnities provided by
the Trust Agreement, including estimated compensation of the Trustee and costs
of liquidation and any amounts required as a reserve to provide for payment of
any applicable taxes or other governmental charges. The sale of Securities in
the Trust upon termination may result in a lower amount than might otherwise
be realized if such sale were not required at such time. For this reason,
among others, the amount realized by a Unitholder upon termination may be less
than the principal amount or par amount of Securities represented by the Units
held by such Unitholder. The Trustee shall then distribute to each Unitholder
his share of the balance of the Interest and Principal Accounts. With such
distribution the Unitholder shall be furnished a final distribution statement
of the amount distributable. At such time as the Trustee in its sole
discretion shall determine that any amounts held in reserve are no longer
necessary, it shall make distribution thereof to Unitholders in the same
manner.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with final distributions to
Unitholders of an Insured Trust, it should be noted that because the portfolio
insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is applicable only while Bonds so
insured are held by such Trust, the price to be received by such Trust upon
the disposition of any such Bond which is in default, by reason of nonpayment
of principal or interest, will not reflect any value based on such insurance.
Therefore, in connection with any liquidation, it shall not be necessary for
the Trustee to, and the Trustee does not currently intend to, dispose of any
Bond or Bonds if retention of such Bond or Bonds, until due, shall be deemed
to be in the best interest of Unitholders, including, but not limited to,
situations in which a Bond or Bonds so insured are in default and situations
in which a Bond or Bonds so insured have deteriorated market prices resulting
from a significant risk of default. Since the Preinsured Bonds will reflect
the value of the related insurance, it is the present intention of the Sponsor
not to direct the Trustee to hold any of such Preinsured Bonds after the date
of termination. All proceeds received, less applicable expenses, from
insurance on defaulted Bonds not disposed of at the date of termination will
ultimately be distributed to Unitholders of record as of such date of
termination as soon as practicable
<PAGE>
90 Trust Administration
after the date such defaulted Bond or Bonds become due and applicable
insurance proceeds have been received by the Trustee.
LIMITATION ON LIABILITIES. The Sponsor, the Evaluator and the Trustee
shall be under no liability to Unitholders for taking any action or for
refraining from taking any action in good faith pursuant to the Trust
Agreement, or for errors in judgment, but shall be liable only for their own
willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their
duties or by reason of their reckless disregard of their obligations and
duties hereunder. The Trustee shall not be liable for depreciation or loss
incurred by reason of the sale by the Trustee of any of the Securities. In the
event of the failure of the Sponsor to act under the Trust Agreement, the
Trustee may act thereunder and shall not be liable for any action taken by it
in good faith under the Trust Agreement.
The Trustee shall not be liable for any taxes or other governmental
charges imposed upon or in respect of the Securities or upon the interest
thereon or upon it as Trustee under the Trust Agreement or upon or in respect
of the Fund which the Trustee may be required to pay under any present or
future law of the United States of America or of any other taxing authority
having jurisdiction. In addition, the Trust Agreement contains other customary
provisions limiting the liability of the Trustee.
The Trustee, Sponsor and Unitholders may rely on any evaluation furnished
by the Evaluator and shall have no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
Determinations by the Evaluator under the Trust Agreement shall be made in
good faith upon the basis of the best information available to it; provided,
however, that the Evaluator shall be under no liability to the Trustee,
Sponsor or Unitholders for errors in judgment. This provision shall not
protect the Evaluator in any case of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross
negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties.
UNIT DISTRIBUTION. During the initial offering period, Units will be
distributed to the public by Underwriters, broker-dealers and others (see
"Underwriting") at the Public Offering Price, plus Purchased Interest, plus
interest accrued but unpaid from the First Settlement Date to the date of
settlement as described above under "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and
Accrued Interest--Accrued Interest". Upon the completion of the initial
offering, Units repurchased in the secondary market, if any, may be offered by
this Prospectus at the secondary Public Offering Price, plus Purchased
Interest plus interest accrued to the date of settlement in the manner
described.
The Sponsor intends to qualify the Units for sale in a number of states.
Broker-dealers or others will be allowed a concession or agency commission in
connection with the distribution of Units during the initial offering period
of $20.00 per Unit for less than 100 Units, $22.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $21.50 per Unit for any single transaction of
250 to 499 Units, $24.50 per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999
Units and $24.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units of
an IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust, and in the case of an IM-IT Limited
Maturity Trust, $27.00 per Unit for less than 100 Units, $31.00 per Unit for
any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $30.50 per Unit for any single
transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $33.50 per Unit for any single transaction of
500 to 999 Units and $31.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 1,000 or
more Units. And in the case of a State Trust, $30.00 per Unit for less than
100 Units, $36.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units,
$38.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $39.00 per
Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $39.00 per Unit for
any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units, provided that such Units are
acquired either from the Sponsor (in the case of dealer transactions) or
through the Sponsor (in the case of transactions involving brokers or others).
The increased concession or agency commission is a result of the discount
given to purchasers for quantity purchases. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General". Certain commercial banks are making
Units of the Fund available to their customers on an agency basis. A portion
of the sales charge paid by these customers (equal to the agency commission
referred to above) is retained by or remitted to the banks. Under the
Glass-Steagall Act, banks are prohibited from underwriting Units of the Fund;
however, the Glass-Steagall Act does permit certain agency transactions and
the banking regulators have not indicated that these particular agency
transactions are not permitted under such Act. In addition, state securities
laws on this issue may differ from the interpretations of federal law
expressed herein and banks and financial institutions may be required to
register as dealers pursuant to state law. Any quantity discount (see
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--General") provided to investors
will be borne by the selling dealer or agent. For secondary market
transactions, such concession or agency commission will amount to 70% of the
applicable sales charge as determined using the table found in "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering".
<PAGE>
Trust Administration 91
To facilitate the handling of transactions during the initial offering
period, sales of Units shall normally be limited to transactions involving a
minimum of five Units. Further purchases may be made in multiples of one Unit.
The minimum purchase in the secondary market will be one Unit.
The Sponsor reserves the right to reject, in whole or in part, any order
for the purchase of Units and to change the amount of the concession or agency
commission to dealers and others from time to time. See "Underwriting".
SPONSOR AND UNDERWRITER COMPENSATION. The Underwriters will receive a
gross sales commission equal to that percentage of the Public Offering Price
of the Units (excluding Purchased Interest) as indicated under "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" less any reduced sales charges
for quantity purchases as described under "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--General".
The Sponsor will receive from the Underwriters the excess of such gross
sales commission over $35.00, $29.00, $27.00, $22.00 and $35.00 per Unit of
any Quality, IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, IM-IT Short
Intermediate and other Insured Trusts, respectively, as of the Date of
Deposit. In connection with quantity sales to purchasers of any State Trust
the Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor commissions totalling $37.00
per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $39.00 per Unit for
any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $40.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $39.00 per Unit for any single transaction
of 1,000 or more Units. In connection with quantity sales to purchasers of any
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust the Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor
commissions totalling $23.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249
Units, $23.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $24.75
per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $24.00 per Unit
for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units. In connection with quantity
sales to purchasers of any IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust the Underwriters will
receive from the Sponsor commissions totalling $32.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $32.00 per Unit for any single transaction of
250 to 499 Units, $34.50 per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999
Units and $31.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units.
In addition, A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. ("Edwards"), which acts as a
Managing Underwriter of Units of the various series of the IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust and the IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, respectively, will
receive from the Sponsor reimbursement for certain costs and further
compensation in the amount of $2.00 for each Unit it underwrites of the IM-IT
Short Intermediate Trust, provided it underwrites a minimum of 1,000 Units of
such Trust and $5.00 for each Unit of the IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust it
underwrites. The Sponsor and First Investors Corporation ("First Investors")
have entered into an agreement under which First Investors will receive an
additional $5.00 per Unit in connection with a minimum commitment of 17.5% of
the total Units of the New York IM-IT Trust, provided that the New York IM-IT
Trust does not exceed 10,000 Units. If the New York IM-IT Trust exceeds 10,000
Units, First Investors will receive an additional $5.00 per Unit if First
Investors underwrites the lesser of 3,000 Units or 20% of the New York IM-IT
Trust. In addition, the Sponsor has entered into agreements with Advest, Inc.
("Advest") and Gruntal & Co., Inc. ("Gruntal") whereby Advest and Gruntal will
receive an additional $2.00 per Unit in connection with a minimum commitment
of 1,500 Units of any New York IM-IT Trust. Also, the Sponsor will receive
from the Managing Underwriters of the New York IM-IT Trust (who underwrite 15%
of the Trust or 1,000 Units of the Trust, whichever is greater) the excess of
such gross sales commission over $38.00 per Unit of the Trust, as of the Date
of Deposit. Also, the Sponsor will receive from the Managing Underwriters of
the Oregon Quality Trust (who underwrite 15% of the Trust or 1,000 Units,
whichever is greater) the excess of such gross sales commission over $38.00
per Unit of any Oregon Quality Trust, as of the Date of Deposit. Also, any
such Managing Underwriter that sells a total of 25% or 1,500 Units, whichever
is greater, of any Oregon Quality Trust will receive an additional $2.00 per
each such Unit. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--General".
Further, each Underwriter who underwrites 1,000 or more Units in any Trust
will receive additional compensation from the Sponsor of $1.00 for each Unit
it underwrites. In addition, the Sponsor and certain of the Underwriters will
realize a profit or the Sponsor will sustain a loss, as the case may be, as a
result of the difference between the price paid for the Securities by the
Sponsor and the cost of such Securities to a Trust (which is based on the
determination by Interactive Data Services, Inc. of the aggregate offering
price of the underlying Securities in such Trust on the Date of Deposit). See
"Underwriting" and "Portfolio" for the applicable Trust and "Notes to
Portfolios". The Sponsor and the Underwriters may also realize profits or
sustain losses with respect to Securities deposited in each Trust which were
acquired by the Sponsor from underwriting syndicates of which they were
members. The Sponsor has participated as sole underwriter or as manager
or as a member of the underwriting syndicates from which none of the aggregate
principal amount of the Securities in the portfolios of the Fund were
acquired. The Underwriters may further realize additional profit or loss
during the initial offering period as a result of the possible fluctuations in
the market value of the Securities in each Trust after the Date of Deposit,
since all proceeds received from purchasers of Units (excluding dealer
concessions or
<PAGE>
92 Trust Administration
agency commissions allowed, if any) will be retained by the Underwriters.
Affiliates of an Underwriter are entitled to the same dealer concessions or
agency commissions that are available to the Underwriter.
As stated under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Market for
Units", the Sponsor intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may,
maintain a secondary market for the Units of the Fund. In so maintaining a
market, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses in
the amount of any difference between the price at which Units are purchased
and the price at which Units are resold (which price is based on the bid
prices of the Securities in such Trust and includes a sales charge). In
addition, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses
resulting from a redemption of such repurchased Units at a price above or
below the purchase price for such Units, respectively.
<PAGE>
Other Matters 93
OTHER MATTERS
LEGAL OPINIONS. The legality of the Units offered hereby and certain
matters relating to Federal, Florida, Hawaii, Oregon and Virginia tax law have
been passed upon by Chapman and Cutler, 111 West Monroe Street, Chicago,
Illinois 60603, as counsel for the Sponsor. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has
acted as special counsel to the Fund for California tax matters. Miller,
Canfield, Paddock & Stone has acted as special counsel to the Fund for
Michigan tax matters. Tanner Propp & Farber has acted as counsel for the
Trustee and as special counsel to the Fund for New York tax matters. None of
the special counsel for the Fund has expressed any opinion regarding the
completeness or materiality of any matters contained in this Prospectus other
than the tax opinion set forth under "Tax Status" relating to the Trust for
which it has provided an opinion.
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. The statements of condition and
the related securities portfolios at the Date of Deposit included in this
Prospectus have been audited by Grant Thornton, independent certified public
accountants, as set forth in their report in this prospectus, and are included
herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
FEDERAL TAX STATUS
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, under
existing law:
(1) Each Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation for
Federal income tax purposes and interest and accrued original issue
discount on Bonds which is excludable from gross income under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") will retain its status when
distributed to Unitholders, except to the extent such interest is
subject to the alternative minimum tax, an additional tax on branches
of foreign corporations and the environmental tax (the "Superfund
Tax"), as noted below;
(2) Each Unitholder is considered to be the owner of a pro rata portion
of the respective Trust under subpart E, subchapter J of chapter 1 of
the Code and will have a taxable event when such Trust disposes of a
Bond, or when the Unitholder redeems or sells his Units. Unitholders
must reduce the tax basis of their Units for their share of accrued
interest received by the respective Trust, if any, on Bonds delivered
after the Unitholders pay for their Units to the extent that such
interest accrued on such Bonds during the period from the Unitholder's
settlement date to the date such Bonds are delivered to the respective
Trust and, consequently, such Unitholders may have an increase in
taxable gain or reduction in capital loss upon the disposition of such
Units. Gain or loss upon the sale or redemption of Units is measured
by comparing the proceeds of such sale or redemption with the adjusted
basis of the Units. If the Trustee disposes of Bonds (whether by sale,
payment on maturity, redemption or otherwise), gain or loss is
recognized to the Unitholder. The amount of any such gain or loss is
measured by comparing the Unitholder's pro rata share of the total
proceeds from such disposition with the Unitholder's basis for his or
her fractional interest in the asset disposed of. In the case of a
Unitholder who purchases Units, such basis (before adjustment for
earned original issue discount and amortized bond premium, if any) is
determined by apportioning the cost of the Units among each of the
Trust assets ratably according to value as of the date of acquisition
of the Units. The tax cost reduction requirements of the Code relating
to amortization of bond premium may, under some circumstances, result
in the Unitholder realizing a taxable gain when his Units are sold or
redeemed for an amount equal to his original cost;
(3) Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy or policies dated the
Date of Deposit, issued to an Insured Trust by AMBAC Indemnity,
Financial Guaranty or a combination thereof with respect to the Bonds
which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the
Trustee will be excludable from Federal gross income if, and to the
same extent as, such interest would have been so excludable if paid by
the issuer of the defaulted obligations provided that, at the time
such policies are purchased, the amounts paid for such policies are
reasonable, customary and consistent with the reasonable expectation
that the issuer of the obligations, rather than the insurer, will pay
debt service on the obligations; and
(4) Any proceeds paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of
Bonds which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held
by the Trustee will be excludable from Federal gross income if, and to
the same extent as, such interest would have been excludable if paid
in the normal course by the issuer
<PAGE>
94 Other Matters
of the defaulted obligations provided that, at the time such policies
are purchased, the amounts paid for such policies are reasonable,
customary and consistent with the reasonable expectation that the
issuer of the obligations, rather than the insurer, will pay debt
service on the obligations.
Sections 1288 and 1272 of the Code provide a complex set of rules
governing the accrual of original issue discount. These rules provide that
original issue discount accrues either on the basis of a constant compound
interest rate or ratably over the term of the Bond, depending on the date the
Bond was issued. In addition, special rules apply if the purchase price of a
Bond exceeds the original issue price plus the amount of original issue
discount which would have previously accrued based upon its issue price (its
"adjusted issue price") to prior owners. The application of these rules will
also vary depending on the value of the Bond on the date a Unitholder acquires
his Units and the price the Unitholder pays for his Units. Investors with
questions regarding these Code sections should consult with their tax
advisers.
"The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993" (the "Tax Act") subjects
tax-exempt bonds to the market discount rules of the Code effective for bonds
purchased after April 30, 1993. In general, market discount is the amount (if
any) by which the stated redemption price at maturity exceeds an investor's
purchase price (except to the extent that such difference, if any, is
attributable to original issue discount not yet accrued). Market discount can
arise based on the price a Trust pays for Bonds or the price a Unitholder pays
for his or her Units. Under the Tax Act, accretion of market discount is
taxable as ordinary income; under prior law the accretion had been treated as
capital gain. Market discount that accretes while a Trust holds a Bond would
be recognized as ordinary income by the Unitholders when principal payments
are received on the Bond, upon sale or at redemption (including early
redemption), or upon the sale or redemption of his or her Units, unless a
Unitholder elects to include market discount in taxable income as it accrues.
The market discount rules are complex and Unitholders should consult their tax
advisers regarding these rules and their application.
In the case of certain corporations, the alternative minimum tax and the
Superfund Tax for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986 depends upon
the corporation's alternative minimum taxable income, which is the
corporation's taxable income with certain adjustments. One of the adjustment
items used in computing the alternative minimum taxable income and the
Superfund Tax of a corporation (other than an S Corporation, Regulated
Investment Company, Real Estate Investment Trust, or REMIC) is an amount equal
to 75% of the excess of such corporation's "adjusted current earnings" over an
amount equal to its alternative minimum taxable income (before such adjustment
item and the alternative tax net operating loss deduction). "Adjusted current
earnings" includes all tax exempt interest, including interest on all of the
Bonds in the Fund. Unitholders are urged to consult their tax advisers with
respect to the particular tax consequences to them including the corporate
alternative minimum tax, the Superfund Tax and the branch profits tax imposed
by Section 884 of the Code.
Counsel for the Sponsor has also advised that under Section 265 of the
Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry
Units of a Trust is not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. The
Internal Revenue Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need
not be directly traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units (however, these
rules generally do not apply to interest paid on indebtedness incurred to
purchase or improve a personal residence). Also, under Section 265 of the
Code, certain financial institutions that acquire Units would generally not be
able to deduct any of the interest expense attributable to ownership of such
Units. Investors with questions regarding this issue should consult with their
tax advisers.
In the case of certain of the Bonds in the Fund, the opinions of bond
counsel indicate that interest on such Bonds received by a "substantial user"
of the facilities being financed with the proceeds of these Bonds, or persons
related thereto, for periods while such Bonds are held by such a user or
related person, will not be excludible from Federal gross income, although
interest on such Bonds received by others would be excludible from Federal
gross income. "Substantial user" and "related person" are defined under U.S.
Treasury Regulations. Any person who believes that he or she may be a
"substantial user" or a "related person" as so defined should contact his or
her tax adviser.
In the opinion of Tanner Propp & Farber, special counsel to the Fund for
New York tax matters, under existing law, the Fund and each Trust are not
associations taxable as corporations and the income of each Trust will be
treated as the income of the Unitholders under the income tax laws of the
State and City of New York.
All statements of law in the Prospectus concerning exclusion from gross
income for Federal, state or other tax purposes are the opinions of counsel
and are to be so construed.
<PAGE>
Other Matters 95
At the respective times of issuance of the Bonds, opinions relating to
the validity thereof and to the exclusion of interest thereon from Federal
gross income are rendered by bond counsel to the respective issuing
authorities. Neither the Sponsor nor Chapman and Cutler has made any special
review for the Fund of the proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds
or of the basis for such opinions.
In the case of corporations, the alternative tax rate applicable to
long-term capital gains is 35%, effective for long-term capital gains realized
in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1993. For taxpayers other
than corporations, net capital gains are subject to a maximum marginal stated
tax rate of 28%. However, it should be noted that legislative proposals are
introduced from time to time that affect tax rates and could affect relative
differences at which ordinary income and capital gains are taxed. Under the
Code, taxpayers must disclose to the Internal Revenue Service the amount of
tax-exempt interest earned during the year.
Section 86 of the Code, in general, provides that 50% of Social Security
benefits are includible in gross income to the extent that the sum of
"modified adjusted gross income" plus 50% of the Social Security benefits
received exceeds a "base amount". The base amount is $25,000 for unmarried
taxpayers, $32,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return and zero for
married taxpayers who do not live apart at all times during the taxable year
and who file separate returns. Modified adjusted gross income is adjusted
gross income determined without regard to certain otherwise allowable
deductions and exclusions from gross income and by including tax-exempt
interest. To the extent that Social Security benefits are includible in gross
income, they will be treated as any other item of gross income.
In addition, under the Tax Act, for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 1993, up to 85% of Social Security benefits are includible in
gross income to the extent that the sum of "modified adjusted gross income"
plus 50% of Social Security benefits received exceeds an "adjusted base
amount." The adjusted base amount is $34,000 for unmarried taxpayers, $44,000
for married taxpayers filing a joint return, and zero for married taxpayers
who do not live apart at all times during the taxable year and who file
separate returns.
Although tax-exempt interest is included in modified adjusted gross
income solely for the purpose of determining what portion, if any, of Social
Security benefits will be included in gross income, no tax-exempt interest,
including that received from a Trust, will be subject to tax. A taxpayer whose
adjusted gross income already exceeds the base amount or the adjusted base
amount must include 50% or 85%, respectively, of his Social Security benefits
in gross income whether or not he receives any tax-exempt interest. A taxpayer
whose modified adjusted gross income (after inclusion of tax-exempt interest)
does not exceed the base amount need not include any Social Security benefits
in gross income.
For a discussion of the state tax status of income earned on Units of a
Trust, see "Tax Status" for the applicable Trust. Except as noted therein, the
exemption of interest on state and local obligations for Federal income tax
purposes discussed above does not necessarily result in exemption under the
income or other tax laws of any State or City. The laws of the several States
vary with respect to the taxation of such obligations.
<PAGE>
96 Other Matters
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS*
STANDARD & POOR'S CORPORATION. A Standard & Poor's Corporation
("Standard & Poor's") corporate or municipal bond rating is a current
assessment of the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific
debt obligation. This assessment of creditworthiness may take into
consideration obligors such as guarantors, insurers or lessees.
The bond rating is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a security,
inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price.
The ratings are based on current information furnished to Standard &
Poor's by the issuer and obtained by Standard & Poor's from other sources it
considers reliable. The ratings may be changed, suspended or withdrawn as a
result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information.
The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following
considerations:
I. Likelihood of default--capacity and willingness of the obligor as to
the timely payment of interest and repayment of principal in accordance
with the terms of the obligation.
II. Nature of and provisions of the obligation.
III. Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in
the event of bankruptcy, reorganization or other arrangements under the
laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights.
AAA--This is the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's to a debt
obligation and indicates an extremely strong capacity to pay principal and
interest.
AA--Bonds rated AA also qualify as high-quality debt obligations.
Capacity to pay principal and interest is very strong, and in the majority of
instances they differ from AAA issues only in small degree.
A--Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay principal and interest,
although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes
in circumstances and economic conditions.
BBB--Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate
protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances
are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay
principal for debt in this category than in higher rated categories.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): To provide more detailed indications of credit
quality, the ratings from "AA" to "BBB" may be modified by the addition of a
plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating
categories.
Provisional Ratings: A provisional rating ("p") assumes the successful
completion of the project being financed by the issuance of the bonds being
rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements is largely or
entirely dependent upon the successful and timely completion of the project.
This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to
completion, makes no comment on the likelihood of, or the risk of default upon
failure of, such completion. Accordingly, the investor should exercise his own
judgment with respect to such likelihood and risk.
MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. A brief description of the applicable
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") rating symbols and their meanings
follows:
Aaa--Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be the best quality. They
carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as
"gilt edge". Interest payments are protected by a large, or by an
exceptionally stable, margin and principal is secure. While the various
protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized
are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues.
With the occasional exception of oversupply in a few specific instances, the
safety of obligations of this class is so absolute that their market value is
affected solely by money market fluctuations.
Aa--Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all
standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known
as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins
of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuations of
protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements
present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa
securities. These Aa bonds are high grade, their market value virtually immune
to all but money market influences, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
*As published by the rating companies.
<PAGE>
Other Matters 97
A--Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes
and are to be considered as higher medium grade obligations. Factors giving
security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may
be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the
future. The market value of A-rated bonds may be influenced to some degree by
credit circumstances during a sustained period of depressed business
conditions. During periods of normalcy, bonds of this quality frequently move
in parallel with Aaa and Aa obligations, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
Baa--Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade
obligations; i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured.
Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but
certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically
unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding
investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as
well.
Moody's bond rating symbols may contain numerical modifiers of a generic
rating classification. The modifier 1 indicates that the bond ranks at the
high end of its category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and
the modifier 3 indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic
rating category.
Con--Bonds for which the security depends upon the completion of some act
or the fulfillment of some condition are rated conditionally. These are bonds
secured by (a) earnings of projects under construction, (b) earnings of
projects unseasoned in operating experience, (c) rentals which begin when
facilities are completed, or (d) payments to which some other limiting
condition attaches. Parenthetical rating denotes probable credit stature upon
completion of construction or elimination of basis of condition.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of Van Kampen Merritt Inc. and the Unitholders
of Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt
Trust, Multi-Series 230 (IM-IT Short Intermediate, IM-IT Limited
Maturity, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT, New York
IM-IT, Hawaii Quality, Oregon Quality and Virginia Quality Trusts):
We have audited the accompanying statements of condition and the
related portfolios of Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors'
Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 (IM-IT Short Intermediate,
IM-IT Limited Maturity, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT,
New York IM-IT, Hawaii Quality, Oregon Quality and Virginia Quality
Trusts) as of August 24, 1994. The statements of condition and
portfolios are the responsibility of the Sponsor. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on such financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included
confirmation of irrevocable letters of credit deposited to purchase
tax-exempt securities by correspondence with the Trustee. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by the Sponsor, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Insured
Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 230 (IM-IT Short Intermediate, IM-IT Limited Maturity,
California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT, Hawaii
Quality, Oregon Quality and Virginia Quality Trusts) as of August 24,
1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Chicago, Illinois GRANT THORNTON
August 24, 1994
<PAGE>
98 Other Matters
<PAGE>
Other Matters 99
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
AND
INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST
MULTI-SERIES 230
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
IM-IT SHORT
INTERMEDIATE IM-IT LIMITED CALIFORNIA FLORIDA MICHIGAN
INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES TRUST MATURITY TRUST IM-IT TRUST IM-IT TRUST IM-IT TRUST
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Contracts to purchase tax-exempt securities
<F1><F2><F4>.............................. $ 6,923,515 $ 4,843,092 $ 2,881,588 $ 2,859,516 $ 2,915,040
Accrued interest to the First Settlement
Date <F1><F4>............................. 53,917 54,852 22,949 36,000 47,941
Total.............................. $ 6,977,432 $ 4,897,944 $ 2,904,537 $ 2,895,516 $ 2,962,981
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability--
Accrued interest payable to Sponsor
<F1><F4>................................ $ -- $ 7,234 $ -- $ 6,839 $ 18,165
Interest of Unitholders--
Cost to investors <F3>................ 7,191,497 5,108,300 3,053,000 3,036,000 3,095,000
Less: Gross underwriting commission <F3>.. 214,065 217,590 148,463 147,323 150,184
Net interest to Unitholders
<F1><F3><F4>..................... 6,977,432 4,890,710 2,904,537 2,888,677 2,944,816
Total.............................. $ 6,977,432 $ 4,897,944 $ 2,904,537 $ 2,895,516 $ 2,962,981
<FN>
<F1> The aggregate value of the Securities listed under "Portfolio" for each
Trust herein, and their cost to such Trust are the same. The value of the
Securities is determined by Interactive Data Services, Inc. on the bases
set forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering
Price". The contracts to purchase tax-exempt Securities are
collateralized by irrevocable letters of credit which have been deposited
with the Trustee in and for the following amounts:
OFFERING ACCRUED
PRINCIPAL PRICE INTEREST TO
AMOUNT OF AMOUNT OF OF BONDS EXPECTED
LETTER OF BONDS UNDER UNDER DELIVERY
CREDIT CONTRACTS CONTRACTS DATES
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust.................. $ 6,975,182 $ 7,015,000 $ 6,923,515 $ 51,667
IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust.................... $ 4,894,310 $ 5,000,000 $ 4,843,092 $ 51,218
California IM-IT Trust.......................... $ 2,902,832 $ 3,060,000 $ 2,881,588 $ 21,244
Florida IM-IT Trust............................. $ 2,894,125 $ 3,050,000 $ 2,859,516 $ 34,609
Michigan IM-IT Trust............................ $ 2,960,398 $ 3,145,000 $ 2,915,040 $ 45,358
<F2> Insurance coverage providing for timely payment, when due, of all
principal and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been
obtained either by such Trusts, by a prior owner of the Bonds, by the
Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Bonds or by the issuers of the Bonds
involved. Such insurance does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds
or the value of the Units. The insurance obtained by the Insured Trusts
is effective only while Bonds thus insured are held in such Trusts.
Neither the bid nor offering prices of the underlying Bonds or of the
Units, absent situations in which bonds are in default in payment of
principal or interest or in significant risk of such default, include
value, if any, attributable to the insurance obtained by such Trusts.
<F3> The aggregate public offering price (exclusive of interest) and the
aggregate sales charge are computed on the bases set forth under
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" and "Trust
Administration--General-- Sponsor and Underwriter Profits" and assume all
single transactions involve less than 100 Units. For single transactions
involving 100 or more Units, the sales charge is reduced (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General") resulting in an equal reduction
in both the Cost to investors and the Gross underwriting commission while
the Net interest to Unitholders remains unchanged.
<F4> Accrued interest on the underlying Securities represents the interest
accrued as of the First Settlement Date from the later of the last
payment date on the Securities or the date of issuance thereof. The
Trustee may advance to the Trust a portion of the accrued interest on the
underlying Securities for distribution to the Sponsor as the Unitholder
of record as of the First Settlement Date. A portion of the accrued
interest ("Purchased Interest") on the underlying Securities, as
indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information", is payable
by investors and is included in the Public Offering Price. Purchased
Interest is the difference between Accrued interest to the First
Settlement Date and Accrued interest payable to Sponsor.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
100 Other Matters
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
AND
INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST
MULTI-SERIES 230
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION (CONTINUED)
AS OF AUGUST 24, 1994
<CAPTION>
NEW YORK HAWAII OREGON VIRGINIA
INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES IM-IT TRUST QUALITY TRUST QUALITY TRUST QUALITY TRUST
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Contracts to purchase tax-exempt securities <F1><F2><F4>... $ 2,868,749 $ 2,997,418 $ 3,047,318 $ 2,860,423
Accrued interest to the First Settlement Date <F1><F4>..... 37,080 45,996 34,905 39,793
Total............................................. $ 2,905,829 $ 3,043,414 $ 3,082,223 $ 2,900,216
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability--
Accrued interest payable to Sponsor <F1><F4>............. $ 7,624 $ 15,847 $ 4,226 $ 10,584
Interest of Unitholders--
Cost to investors <F3>............................... 3,046,000 3,182,000 3,235,000 3,037,000
Less: Gross underwriting commission <F3>................. 147,795 154,433 157,003 147,368
Net interest to Unitholders <F1><F3><F4>.......... 2,898,205 3,027,567 3,077,997 2,889,632
Total............................................. $ 2,905,829 $ 3,043,414 $ 3,082,223 $ 2,900,216
<FN>
<F1> The aggregate value of the Securities listed under "Portfolio" for each
Trust herein, and their cost to such Trust are the same. The value of the
Securities is determined by Interactive Data Services, Inc. on the bases
set forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering
Price". The contracts to purchase tax-exempt Securities are
collateralized by irrevocable letters of credit which have been deposited
with the Trustee in and for the following amounts:
OFFERING ACCRUED
PRINCIPAL PRICE INTEREST TO
AMOUNT OF AMOUNT OF OF BONDS EXPECTED
LETTER OF BONDS UNDER UNDER DELIVERY
CREDIT CONTRACTS CONTRACTS DATES
New York IM-IT Trust............................ $ 2,904,911 $ 3,010,000 $ 2,868,749 $ 36,162
Hawaii Quality Trust............................ $ 3,040,539 $ 3,080,000 $ 2,997,418 $ 43,121
Oregon Quality Trust............................ $ 3,079,271 $ 3,120,000 $ 3,047,318 $ 31,953
Virginia Quality Trust.......................... $ 2,899,024 $ 3,200,000 $ 2,860,423 $ 38,601
<F2> Insurance coverage providing for timely payment, when due, of all
principal and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been
obtained either by such Trusts, by a prior owner of the Bonds, by the
Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Bonds or by the issuers of the Bonds
involved. Such insurance does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds
or the value of the Units. The insurance obtained by the Insured Trusts
is effective only while Bonds thus insured are held in such Trusts.
Neither the bid nor offering prices of the underlying Bonds or of the
Units, absent situations in which bonds are in default in payment of
principal or interest or in significant risk of such default, include
value, if any, attributable to the insurance obtained by such Trusts.
<F3> The aggregate public offering price (exclusive of interest) and the
aggregate sales charge are computed on the bases set forth under
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" and "Trust
Administration--General-- Sponsor and Underwriter Profits" and assume all
single transactions involve less than 100 Units. For single transactions
involving 100 or more Units, the sales charge is reduced (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General") resulting in an equal reduction
in both the Cost to investors and the Gross underwriting commission while
the Net interest to Unitholders remains unchanged.
<F4> Accrued interest on the underlying Securities represents the interest
accrued as of the First Settlement Date from the later of the last
payment date on the Securities or the date of issuance thereof. The
Trustee may advance to the Trust a portion of the accrued interest on the
underlying Securities for distribution to the Sponsor as the Unitholder
of record as of the First Settlement Date. A portion of the accrued
interest ("Purchased Interest") on the underlying Securities, as
indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information", is payable
by investors and is included in the Public Offering Price. Purchased
Interest is the difference between Accrued interest to the First
Settlement Date and Accrued interest payable to Sponsor.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 101
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLES
As of the date of this prospectus, the following tables show the
approximate taxable estimated current returns for individuals that are
equivalent to tax-exempt estimated current returns under combined Federal and
State taxes (where applicable) using the published Federal and State tax rates
(where applicable) scheduled to be in effect in 1994. They incorporate
increased tax rates for higher income taxpayers that were included in the
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. These tables illustrate approximately what
you would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt
estimated current return in your income tax bracket. For cases in which more
than one State bracket falls within a Federal bracket, the highest State
bracket is combined with the Federal bracket. The combined State and Federal
tax rates shown reflect the fact that State tax payments are currently
deductible for Federal tax purposes. The tables do not show the approximate
taxable estimated current returns for individuals that are subject to the
alternative minimum tax. The taxable equivalent estimated current returns may
be somewhat higher than the equivalent returns indicated in the following
tables for those individuals who have adjusted gross incomes in excess of
$111,800. The tables do not reflect the effect of limitations on itemized
deductions and the deduction for personal exemptions. They were designed to
phase out certain benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers.
These limitations, in effect, raise the marginal maximum Federal tax rate to
approximately 44 percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to
four personal exemptions and to approximately 41 percent for taxpayers filing
a single return entitled to only one personal exemption. These limitations are
subject to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed
and the total amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the
limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to lose more than
80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions. See "Other
Matters--Federal Tax Status" for a more detailed discussion of recent Federal
tax legislation, including a discussion of provisions affecting corporations.
<TABLE>
SHORT INTERMEDIATE
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET 4% 4 1/2% 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 15% 4.71% 5.29% 5.88% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 28 5.56 6.25 6.94 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 31 5.80 6.52 7.25 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 36 6.25 7.03 7.81 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 39.6 6.62 7.45 8.28 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
LIMITED MATURITY
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 15% 5.88% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24% 8.82% 9.41%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 28 6.94 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72 10.42 11.11
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 31 7.25 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14 10.87 11.59
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 36 7.81 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94 11.72 12.50
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 39.6 8.28 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59 12.42 13.25
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
CALIFORNIA
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 20.1% 6.88% 7.51% 8.14% 8.76% 9.39% 10.01% 10.64%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 34.7 8.42 9.19 9.95 10.72 11.49 12.25 13.02
91.90 - 140.00 37.4 8.79 9.58 10.38 11.18 11.98 12.78 13.58
55.10 - 115.00 37.9 8.86 9.66 10.47 11.27 12.08 12.88 13.69
115.00 - 212.38 140.00 - 250.00 42.4 9.55 10.42 11.28 12.15 13.02 13.89 14.76
212.38 - 250.00 43 9.65 10.53 11.40 12.28 13.16 14.04 14.91
250.00 - 424.76 45.6 10.11 11.03 11.95 12.87 13.79 14.71 15.63
Over 250.00 Over 424.76 46.2 10.22 11.15 12.08 13.01 13.94 14.87 15.80
</TABLE>
*The State tax rates assumed take into account recent adjustments of tax
brackets based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. The table reflects
California income tax laws that increase State income tax rates for high
income taxpayers. However, the table does not reflect the limitation on
itemized deductions and the phase out of the benefit for the personal
exemption credit and the dependent exemption credit that are imposed by the
California income tax laws in a manner similar to Federal tax law.
<PAGE>
102 Other Matters
<TABLE>
FLORIDA
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 15% 5.88% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24% 8.82% 9.41%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 28 6.94 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72 10.42 11.11
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 31 7.25 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14 10.87 11.59
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 36 7.81 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94 11.72 12.50
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 39.6 8.28 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59 12.42 13.25
</TABLE>
*The State of Florida imposes no income tax on individuals; accordingly, the
table reflects only exemption from Federal income taxes. The table does not
reflect the exemption of Units of the Florida IM-IT Trust from the State's
intangible tax; accordingly, Florida residents subject to such tax would need
a somewhat higher taxable estimated current return than those shown to equal
the tax-exempt estimated current return of the Florida IM-IT Trust.
<TABLE>
MICHIGAN
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 21.8% 7.03% 7.67% 8.31% 8.95% 9.59% 10.23% 10.87%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 33.7 8.30 9.05 9.80 10.56 11.31 12.07 12.82
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 36.5 8.66 9.45 10.24 11.02 11.81 12.60 13.39
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 41.1 9.34 10.19 11.04 11.88 12.73 13.58 14.43
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 44.4 9.89 10.79 11.69 12.59 13.49 14.39 15.29
</TABLE>
*The combined State and Federal tax bracket is computed utilizing a 4.47%
state personal income tax rate which is a weighted average rate that takes
into account a change in tax rates which was recently approved by Michigan
voters and a 3.5% tax on intangible income. The bracket does not reflect the
effect of the exemption from local income taxes; accordingly, Michigan
residents subject to such local income taxes would need a somewhat higher
taxable estimated current return than those shown to equal the tax-exempt
estimated current return of the Trust.
<TABLE>
NEW YORK
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 21.5% 7.01% 7.64% 8.28% 8.92% 9.55% 10.19% 10.83%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 33.5 8.27 9.02 9.77 10.53 11.28 12.03 12.78
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 36.2 8.62 9.40 10.19 10.97 11.76 12.54 13.32
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 40.9 9.31 10.15 11.00 11.84 12.69 13.54 14.38
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 44.2 9.86 10.75 11.65 12.54 13.44 14.34 15.23
</TABLE>
*Combined Federal and State tax bracket was computed assuming that the
investor is not subject to local income taxes, such as New York City taxes.
Should a Unitholder reside in a locality which imposes an income tax, the
Unitholder's equivalent taxable estimated current return would be greater than
the equivalent taxable estimated current returns indicated in the table. The
table does not reflect the recent enactment of a New York State supplemental
income tax based upon a taxpayer's New York State taxable income and New York
State adjusted gross income. This supplemental tax results in an increased
marginal state income tax rate to the extent a taxpayer's New York State
adjusted gross income ranges between $100,000 and $150,000. In addition, the
table does not reflect the amendments to the New York State income tax law
that imposed limitations on the deductibility of itemized deductions. The
application of the New York State supplemental income tax and limitation on
itemized deductions may result in a higher combined Federal, State and local
tax rate than indicated in the table.
<TABLE>
HAWAII
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 38.00 23.1% 6.50% 7.15% 7.80% 8.45% 9.10% 9.75% 10.40%
$ 0 - 22.80 23.5% 6.54 7.19 7.84 8.50 9.15 9.80 10.46
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 35.2 7.72 8.49 9.26 10.03 10.80 11.57 12.35
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 37.9 8.05 8.86 9.66 10.47 11.27 12.08 12.88
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 42.4 8.68 9.55 10.42 11.28 12.15 13.02 13.89
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 45.6 9.19 10.11 11.03 11.95 12.87 13.79 14.71
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 103
<TABLE>
OREGON
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN RETURN BRACKET 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 22.7% 6.47% 7.12% 7.76% 8.41% 9.06% 9.70% 10.35%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 34.5 7.63 8.40 9.16 9.92 10.69 11.45 12.21
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 37.2 7.96 8.76 9.55 10.35 11.15 11.94 12.74
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 41.8 8.59 9.45 10.35 11.17 12.03 12.89 13.75
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 45 9.09 10.00 10.91 11.82 12.73 13.64 14.55
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
VIRGINIA
<CAPTION>
TAXABLE INCOME ($1,000'S) TAX-EXEMPT ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
SINGLE JOINT TAX
RETURN BRACKET 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
8% RETURN EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 19.9% 6.87% 7.49% 8.11% 8.74% 9.36% 9.99% 10.61%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 32.1 8.10 8.84 9.57 10.31 11.05 11.78 12.52
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 35 8.46 9.23 10.00 10.77 11.54 12.31 13.08
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 39.7 9.12 9.95 10.78 11.61 12.44 13.27 14.10
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 43.1 9.67 10.54 11.42 12.30 13.18 14.06 14.94
</TABLE>
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns
with the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trusts and returns over specified periods on other similar Van Kampen
Merritt sponsored unit investment trusts with returns on taxable investments
such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank CDs and money market accounts
or money market funds, each of which has investment characteristics that may
differ from those of the Trusts. U.S. Government bonds, for example, are
backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government and bank CDs and
money market accounts are insured by an agency of the federal government.
Money market accounts and money market funds provide stability of principal,
but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition of the short-term debt
market. The investment characteristics of the Trusts are described more fully
elsewhere in this Prospectus.
<PAGE>
104 Other Matters
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS
The tables below set forth the per Unit estimated distributions of
interest, principal and rebates of Purchased Interest to Unitholders. The
tables assume no changes in expenses, no changes in the current interest
rates, no exchanges, redemptions, sales or prepayments of the underlying
Securities prior to maturity or expected retirement date and the receipt of
principal upon maturity or expected retirement date. To the extent the
foregoing assumptions change actual distributions will vary.
<TABLE>
IM-IT SHORT INTERMEDIATE TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 3.85 $ 3.85
November 1994 - August 1998 3.73 3.73
September 1998 3.53 $ 97.64 $.76 101.93
October 1998 - November 1998 3.35 3.35
December 1998 3.35 142.55 1.15 147.05
January 1999 - April 1999 2.79 2.79
May 1999 2.79 28.51 .24 31.54
June 1999 2.67 142.56 1.22 146.45
July 1999 2.07 71.26 73.33
August 1999 2.06 71.29 .59 73.94
September 1999 1.79 142.55 1.17 145.51
October 1999 - November 1999 1.21 1.21
December 1999 1.21 44.90 .35 46.46
January 2000 - June 2000 1.04 1.04
July 2000 1.04 142.56 1.18 144.78
August 2000 .46 .46
September 2000 .19 116.18 1.03 117.40
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 105
<TABLE>
IM-IT LIMITED MATURITY TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.75 $ 4.75
November 1994 - November 2004 4.60 4.60
December 2004 4.60 $ 49.00 $.49 54.09
January 2005 - May 2006 4.36 4.36
June 2006 4.36 150.00 1.50 155.86
July 2006 - May 2008 3.63 3.63
June 2008 3.63 85.00 .84 89.47
July 2008 3.22 149.00 1.39 153.61
August 2008 - September 2008 2.54 2.54
October 2008 2.54 50.00 .50 53.04
November 2008 - April 2009 2.30 2.30
May 2009 2.30 131.00 1.28 134.58
June 2009 1.67 150.00 1.37 153.04
July 2009 1.00 100.00 .97 101.97
August 2009 .52 .52
September 2009 .21 136.00 1.18 137.39
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
106 Other Matters
<TABLE>
CALIFORNIA IM-IT TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.87 $ 4.87
November 1994 - June 2006 4.72 4.72
July 2006 4.72 $163.77 $ 1.32 169.81
August 2006 3.87 163.77 1.32 168.96
September 2006 - June 2020 3.03 3.03
July 2020 3.03 81.89 .63 85.55
August 2020 2.63 163.77 1.21 167.61
September 2020 - September 2022 1.86 1.86
October 2022 1.86 75.34 .52 77.72
November 2022 - August 2023 1.53 1.53
September 2023 1.24 124.47 .88 126.59
October 2023 - November 2023 .98 .98
December 2023 .98 65.50 .47 66.95
January 2024 - August 2025 .68 .68
September 2025 .28 163.78 1.17 165.23
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 107
<TABLE>
FLORIDA IM-IT TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.79 $ 4.79
November 1994 - November 2004 4.64 4.64
December 2004 4.47 $ 60.93 $.63 66.03
January 2005 - September 2020 4.32 4.32
October 2020 4.32 164.69 1.69 170.70
November 2020 - June 2022 3.50 3.50
July 2022 3.50 164.69 1.44 169.63
August 2022 - December 2022 2.79 2.79
January 2023 2.79 164.69 1.51 168.99
February 2023 - May 2023 2.06 2.06
June 2023 2.06 115.28 1.01 118.35
July 2023 - November 2023 1.57 1.57
December 2023 1.57 32.94 .28 34.79
January 2024 1.43 1.43
February 2024 1.43 95.52 .95 97.90
March 2024 - May 2024 .96 .96
June 2024 .96 164.69 1.68 167.33
July 2024 - September 2025 .14 .14
October 2025 .14 41.18 .41 41.73
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
108 Other Matters
<TABLE>
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.79 $ 4.79
November 1994 - April 2017 4.64 4.64
May 2017 4.64 $ 32.31 $.30 37.25
June 2017 - March 2018 4.49 4.49
April 2018 4.49 161.55 1.45 167.49
May 2018 - April 2020 3.78 3.78
May 2020 3.78 130.85 1.33 135.96
June 2020 - September 2021 3.13 3.13
October 2021 3.13 161.55 1.48 166.16
November 2021 - April 2022 2.41 2.41
May 2022 2.41 193.86 1.83 198.10
June 2022 - August 2022 1.51 1.51
September 2022 1.10 174.48 1.60 177.18
October 2022 - July 2024 .73 .73
August 2024 .73 161.55 1.63 163.91
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 109
<TABLE>
NEW YORK IM-IT TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.81 $ 4.81
November 1994 - June 2004 4.65 4.65
July 2004 4.65 $164.14 $ 1.71 170.50
August 2004 - May 2006 3.82 3.82
June 2006 3.82 32.83 .34 36.99
July 2006 - June 2014 3.65 3.65
July 2014 3.47 68.95 .67 73.09
August 2014 - December 2019 3.32 3.32
January 2020 3.32 164.15 1.37 168.84
February 2020 2.65 2.65
March 2020 2.21 164.15 1.70 168.06
April 2020 - June 2020 1.82 1.82
July 2020 1.41 164.15 1.57 167.13
August 2020 - May 2022 1.05 1.05
June 2022 .89 65.66 .66 67.21
July 2022 - March 2034 .74 .74
April 2034 .74 164.15 1.65 166.54
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
110 Other Matters
<TABLE>
HAWAII QUALITY TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.72 $ 4.72
November 1994 - February 2003 4.57 4.57
March 2003 4.57 $157.13 $ 1.64 163.34
April 2003 - May 2006 3.77 3.77
June 2006 3.77 87.99 .89 92.65
July 2006 - September 2011 3.33 3.33
October 2011 3.33 78.57 .72 82.62
November 2011 - December 2013 2.98 2.98
January 2014 2.80 78.57 .67 82.04
February 2014 - June 2016 2.65 2.65
July 2016 2.65 78.56 .79 82.00
August 2016 - June 2018 2.27 2.27
July 2018 2.27 157.14 1.49 160.90
August 2018 - June 2019 1.54 1.54
July 2019 1.54 172.85 1.73 176.12
August 2019 - June 2027 .69 .69
July 2027 .69 157.13 1.54 159.36
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Other Matters 111
<TABLE>
OREGON QUALITY TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.73 $ 4.73
November 1994 - July 2004 4.58 4.58
August 2004 4.58 $154.55 $ 1.64 160.77
September 2004 - May 2006 3.77 3.77
June 2006 3.77 154.56 1.61 159.94
July 2006 2.98 77.28 .80 81.06
August 2006 - September 2006 2.59 2.59
October 2006 2.59 154.56 1.58 158.73
November 2006 - June 2013 1.81 1.81
July 2013 1.45 154.56 1.42 157.43
August 2013 - June 2016 1.12 1.12
July 2016 1.12 37.10 .37 38.59
August 2016 - July 2019 .94 .94
August 2019 .94 154.56 1.29 156.79
September 2019 - June 2022 .31 .31
July 2022 .31 77.28 .77 78.36
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
112 Other Matters
<TABLE>
VIRGINIA QUALITY TRUST
MONTHLY
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PURCHASED ESTIMATED
DISTRIBUTION DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
(EACH MONTH) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION REBATE DISTRIBUTION
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
October 1994 $ 4.79 $ 4.79
November 1994 - May 2015 4.64 4.64
June 2015 4.56 $ 32.92 $.30 37.78
July 2015 - November 2018 4.49 4.49
December 2018 4.26 98.78 .86 103.90
January 2019 - October 2020 4.07 4.07
November 2020 4.07 131.71 1.10 136.88
December 2020 - June 2021 3.53 3.53
July 2021 3.53 164.64 1.37 169.54
August 2021 - July 2022 2.86 2.86
August 2022 2.45 164.64 1.58 168.67
September 2022 - December 2023 2.09 2.09
January 2024 2.09 164.63 1.59 168.31
February 2024 - June 2027 1.31 1.31
July 2027 1.31 164.64 1.44 167.39
August 2027 - December 2029 .61 .61
January 2030 .61 131.71 1.38 133.70
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
<PAGE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
<PAGE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
<PAGE>
PAGE 1
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representations
not contained in this Prospectus; and any information or representation not
contained herein must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the
Fund, the Sponsor or the Underwriters. This Prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in any state
to any person to whom it is not lawful to make such offer in such state.
Title Page
INTRODUCTION..................................... 2
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION....... 3
UNITHOLDER EXPLANATIONS.......................... 7
Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts............... 7
The Fund...................................... 7
Objectives and Securities Selection........... 8
Risk Factors.................................. 9
Replacement Bonds............................. 12
Bond Redemptions.............................. 13
Distributions................................. 14
Certificates.................................. 14
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated
Long-Term Returns............................. 14
Interest Earning Schedule....................... 15
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Interest
Income...................................... 15
Purchased and Accrued Interest.................. 15
Purchased Interest............................ 15
Accrued Interest.............................. 15
Public Offering................................. 16
General....................................... 16
Offering Price................................ 17
Market for Units.............................. 19
Distributions of Interest and Principal....... 19
Reinvestment Option........................... 20
Redemption of Units........................... 20
Reports Provided.............................. 21
Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts.... 22
IM-IT SHORT INTERMEDIATE TRUST................... 29
IM-IT LIMITED MATURITY TRUST..................... 31
CALIFORNIA IM-IT TRUST........................... 33
FLORIDA IM-IT TRUST.............................. 41
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST............................. 48
NEW YORK IM-IT TRUST............................. 53
HAWAII QUALITY TRUST............................. 63
OREGON QUALITY TRUST............................. 68
VIRGINIA QUALITY TRUST........................... 74
NOTES TO PORTFOLIOS.............................. 78
UNDERWRITING..................................... 80
TRUST ADMINISTRATION............................. 83
Fund Administration and Expenses................ 83
Sponsor....................................... 83
Compensation of Sponsor and Evaluator......... 86
Trustee....................................... 86
Trustee's Fee................................. 87
Portfolio Administration...................... 87
Sponsor Purchases of Units.................... 88
Insurance Premiums............................ 88
Miscellaneous Expenses........................ 88
General......................................... 89
Amendment or Termination...................... 89
Limitation on Liabilities..................... 90
Unit Distribution............................. 90
Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation.......... 91
OTHER MATTERS.................................... 93
Legal Opinions.................................. 93
Independent Certified Public Accountants........ 93
FEDERAL TAX STATUS............................... 93
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS................ 96
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS..................................... 97
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION.......................... 98
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
TABLES.......................................... 100
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS.............. 103
This Prospectus contains information concerning the Fund and the Sponsor, but
does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statements and exhibits relating thereto, which the fund has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act
of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and to which reference is
hereby made.
(R) denotes a registered trademark of Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
P R O S P E C T U S
August 24, 1994
LOGO
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
AND
INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST,
MULTI-SERIES 230
IM-IT 94th Short Intermediate
IM-IT 76th Limited Maturity
California IM-IT 131
Florida IM-IT 83
Michigan IM-IT 119
New York IM-IT 121
Hawaii Quality 1
Oregon Quality 53
Virginia Quality 61
LOGO
<PAGE>
PAGE 2
One Parkview Plaza (R)
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Mellon Bank Center
1735 Market Street, Suite 1300
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Please retain this Prospectus for future reference.
<PAGE>
Contents of Registration Statement
This Amendment of Registration Statement comprises the following papers
and documents:
The facing sheet and the Cross-Reference sheet
The Prospectus and the signatures
The consents of independent public accountants, ratings services
and legal counsel
The following exhibits:
1.1 Copy of Trust Agreement.
1.4 Copy of Municipal Bond Investment Trust Insurance Policy issued
by AMBAC Indemnity Corporation Company and/or Financial Guaranty
Insurance Company for each Insured Trust.
1.5 Form of Master Agreement Among Underwriters.
3.1 Opinion and consent of counsel as to legality of securities being
registered.
3.2 Opinion of counsel as to the Federal, Florida, Hawaii, Oregon and
Virginia income tax status of securities being registered.
3.3 Opinion and consent of counsel as to New York income tax status of
the Fund under New York law.
3.4 Opinion and consent of counsel as to income tax status to
California residents of Units of the California IM-IT Trust.
3.5 Opinion and consent of counsel as to income tax status to Michigan
residents of Units of the Michigan IM-IT Trust.
4.1 Consent of Interactive Data Services, Inc.
4.2 Consent of Standard & Poor's Corporation with respect to the
Insured Trusts.
4.3 Consent of Grant Thornton.
Signatures
The Registrant, Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors'
Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230, hereby identifies Insured
Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-
Series 189 and Multi-Series 213 for purposes of the representations
required by Rule 487 and represents the following: (1) that the portfolio
securities deposited in the series as to the securities of which this
Registration Statement is being filed do not differ materially in type or
quality from those deposited in such previous series; (2) that, except to
the extent necessary to identify the specific portfolio securities
deposited in, and to provide essential financial information for, the
series with respect to the securities of which this Registration
Statement is being filed, this Registration Statement does not contain
disclosures that differ in any material respect from those contained in
the registration statements for such previous series as to which the
effective date was determined by the Commission or the staff; and (3)
that it has complied with Rule 460 under the Securities Act of 1933.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant, Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-
Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 has duly caused this Amendment to the
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Chicago and State of Illinois
on the 24th day of August, 1994.
Insured Municipals Income Trust and
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt
Trust, Multi-Series 230
By Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
By Sandra A. Waterworth
Vice President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed below by the
following persons, in the capacities indicated on August 24, 1994.
Signature Title
John C. Merritt Chairman, Chief Executive )
Officer and Director )
William R. Rybak Senior Vice President and )
Chief Financial Officer )
Ronald A. Nyberg Director )
William R. Molinari Director
Sandra A. Waterworth
(Attorney-in-fact*)
* A copy of each of the related powers of attorney was
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with
the Registration Statement on Form S-6 of Insured Municipals Income
Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 203 (File
No. 33-65744) and the same are hereby incorporated herein by this
reference.
Exhibit 1.1
Insured Municipals Income Trust and
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust
Multi-Series 230
Trust Agreement
Dated: August 24, 1994
This Trust Agreement between Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as Depositor,
American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt
Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee, sets forth certain provisions in full and incorporates other
provisions by reference to the document entitled "Insured Municipals
Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust, Effective August 26, 1987 for Multi-Series 59 and
Subsequent Series" (herein called the "Standard Terms and Conditions of
Trust"), and such provisions as are set forth in full and such provisions
as are incorporated by reference constitute a single instrument. All
references herein to Articles and Sections are to Articles and Sections
of the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust.
Witnesseth That:
In consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements herein
contained, the Depositor and the Trustee agree as follows:
Part I
Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust
Subject to the provisions of Part II hereof, all the provisions
contained in the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust are herein
incorporated by reference in their entirety and shall be deemed to be a
part of this instrument as fully and to the same extent as though said
provisions had been set forth in full in this instrument.
Part II
Special Terms and Conditions of Trust
The following special terms and conditions are hereby agreed to:
(a) The Bonds defined in Section 1.01(4), listed in the
Schedules hereto, have been deposited in the Trusts under this Trust
Agreement.
(b) The fractional undivided interest in and ownership of the
various Trusts represented by each Unit thereof is the amount set
forth under "Summary of Essential Financial Information-Fractional
Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit" in the Prospectus.
(c) The approximate amounts, if any, which the Trustee shall
be required to advance out of its own funds and cause to be paid to
the Depositor pursuant to Section 3.05 shall be the amount per Unit
that the Trustee agreed to reduce its fee or pay Trust expenses set
forth in the footnotes to the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust
in the Prospectus times the number of units in such Trust referred
to in Part II (b) of this Trust Agreement.
(d) The First General Record Date and the amount of the second
distribution of funds from the Interest Account of each Trust shall
be the record date for the Interest Account and the amount set forth
under "Interest Earning Schedule" in the Prospectus.
(e) The First Settlement Date shall be the date set forth
under "Summary of Essential Financial Information-First Settlement
Date" in the Prospectus.
(f) Any monies held to purchase "when issued" bonds will be
held in noninterest bearing accounts.
(g) The Evaluation Time for purpose of sale, purchase or
redemption of Units shall be 4:00 P.M. Eastern time.
(h) The face of the form of the Certificates will be
substantially as follows:
No. ___________ Certificate of Ownership _________ Units
--Evidencing--
An Undivided Interest
-In-
This is to certify that ____________________ is the owner and
registered holder of this Certificate evidencing the ownership of
______units of fractional undivided interest in the above-named Trust
created pursuant to the Indenture, a copy of which is available at the
office of the Trustee. This Certificate is issued under and is
subject to the terms, provisions and conditions of the Indenture to
which the Holder of this Certificate by virtue of the acceptance
hereof assents and is bound, a summary of which Indenture is contained
in the Prospectus relating to the Trust. This Certificate is
transferable and interchangeable by the registered owner in person or
by his duly authorized attorney at the Trustee's office upon surrender
of this Certificate properly endorsed or accompanied by a written
instrument of transfer and any other documents that the Trustee may
require for transfer, in form satisfactory to the Trustee and payment
of the fees and expenses provided in the Indenture.
Witness the facsimile signature of a duly authorized officer of
the Sponsor and the manual signature of an authorized signatory of the
Trustee.
Dated:
Van Kampen Merritt Inc., The Bank of New York,
Depositor Trustee
By __________________________ By
Chairman Authorized Signatory
(i) Section 8.02(d) and (e) of the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust are hereby stricken and replaced by the
following:
(d) distribution to each Certificateholder of such Trust such
holder's pro rata share of the balance of the Interest Account of
such Trust;
(e) distribute to each Certificateholder of such Trust such
holder's pro rata share of the balance of the Principal Account of
such Trust; and
In Witness Whereof, Van Kampen Merritt Inc. has caused this Trust
Agreement to be executed by one of its Vice Presidents or Assistant Vice
Presidents and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed and attested by
its Secretary or one of its Vice Presidents or Assistant Secretaries,
American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt
Investment Advisory Corp., has caused this Trust Indenture and Agreement
to be executed by its President or one of its Vice Presidents and its
corporate seal to be hereto affixed and attested to by its Secretary, its
Assistant Secretary or one of its Assistant Vice Presidents and The Bank
of New York, has caused this Trust Agreement to be executed by one of its
Vice Presidents and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed and attested
to by one of its Vice Presidents, Assistant Vice Presidents or Assistant
Treasurers; all as of the day, month and year first above written.
Van Kampen Merritt Inc., Depositor
By Sandra A. Waterworth
Vice President
[Seal]
Attest:
By Gina M. Scumaci
Assistant Secretary
American Portfolio Evaluation
Services a division of Van Kampen
Merritt Investment Advisory
Corp.
By Dennis J. Mcdonnell
President
[Seal]
Attest:
By Scott E. Martin
Secretary
The Bank Of New York
By Jeffrey Bieselin
Vice President
[Seal]
Attest:
By Norbert Loney
Assistant Treasurer
Schedules to Trust Agreement
Securities Initially Deposited
Insured Municipals Income Trust and
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust
Multi-Series 230
(Note: Incorporated herein and made a part hereof as indicated below
are the corresponding "Portfolios" of each of the Trusts as set
forth in the Prospectus.)
Exhibit 1.4
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation
AMBAC c/o CT Corporation Systems
Municipal Bond Investment 44 East Mifflin Street
Trust Insurance Policy Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Administrative Office:
One State Street Plaza
New York, New York 10004
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation (AMBAC) A Wisconsin Stock Insurance Company
Agrees to Guarantee
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors Quality
Tax Exempt Trust, Combined Multi Series 230
(Insured Municipals Income Trust, 94th Short Intermediate Series)
to Van Kampen Merritt, Inc.
("Investment Trust") the insured, the payment of that portion of the
principal of and interest on each of the Bonds which shall be due during
the Policy Period but is unpaid by reason of Nonpayment by the Issuer, in
consideration of the insurance premium paid and subject to the terms and
conditions contained herein or added hereto.
Policy No. FE013517 Policy Date: August 24, 1994
Trustee: The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street, 17flW
New York, New York 10286
In Witness Whereof, the Insurer has caused this Policy to be affixed
with a facsimile of its corporate seal and to be signed by its duly
authorized officers in facsimile to become effective as its original seal
and signatures and binding upon the Insurer by virtue of the
countersignature of its duly authorized representative.
P. Lassiter
President@AMBAC Indemnity Corporation
Stephen D. Cooke
Secretary
/w/Nancy Davila
Authorized Representative@
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation
AMBAC c/o CT Corporation Systems
Municipal Bond Investment 44 East Mifflin Street
Trust Insurance Policy Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Administrative Office:
One State Street Plaza
New York, New York 10004
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation (AMBAC) A Wisconsin Stock Insurance Company
Agrees to Guarantee
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors Quality
Tax Exempt Trust, Combined Multi Series 230
(New York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 121)
to Van Kampen Merritt, Inc.
("Investment Trust") the insured, the payment of that portion of the
principal of and interest on each of the Bonds which shall be due during
the Policy Period but is unpaid by reason of Nonpayment by the Issuer, in
consideration of the insurance premium paid and subject to the terms and
conditions contained herein or added hereto.
Policy No. FE013508 Policy Date: August 24, 1994
Trustee: The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street, 17flW
New York, New York 10286
In Witness Whereof, the Insurer has caused this Policy to be affixed
with a facsimile of its corporate seal and to be signed by its duly
authorized officers in facsimile to become effective as its original seal
and signatures and binding upon the Insurer by virtue of the
countersignature of its duly authorized representative.
P. Lassiter
President@AMBAC Indemnity Corporation
Stephen D. Cooke
Secretary
/w/Nancy Davila
Authorized Representative@
1. Definitions
(a) "Policy" is this policy of insurance and all applications and
schedules for Municipal Bond Investment Trust Insurance relating hereto,
all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
(b) "Bonds" are the specific securities covered by this Policy and
are identified and described in the Schedule attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof.
(c) "Issuer" is each respective issuer, identified in the Schedule,
of the Bonds.
(d) "Investment Trust" is the entity represented to have an
insurable interest in the Bonds insured under this Policy, identified on
the face of this Policy.
(e) "Trustee" is the Trustee of the Investment Trust, or any
successor Trustee thereto or Co-Trustee therewith.
(f) "Sponsor" is the firm or entity responsible for creating the
Investment Trust and thereafter performing the services to it required of
its sponsor, or any successor Sponsor thereof or Co-Sponsor therewith.
(g) "Insured Instrument" is any instrument evidencing all or any
part of the principal or of interest on a Bond which is Due for Payment.
(h) "Policy Period" is the period during which this Policy of
insurance is effective. The Policy Period commences at 12:01 A.M.
(i) "Premium Installment Period" is the period for which
installments of the annual insurance premium are payable monthly,
quarterly or semiannually, as determined initially for the Investment
Trust.
(j) "Nonpayment" is the failure of an Issuer to provide sufficient
funds to the payment agent for payment in full of all principal and
interest on a Bond which is Due for Payment.
(k) "Due for Payment," when referring to principal of a Bond (or
Insured Instrument evidencing such principal), is when the stated
maturity date has been reached, and does not refer to any earlier date on
which payment is due by reason of call for redemption, acceleration or
other advancement of maturity; and when referring to interest on a Bond
(or Insured Instrument evidencing such interest), is when the stated date
for payment has been reached.
(l) "Bond Proceedings" are the legal proceedings by which each of
the Bonds has been authorized, issued or secured, including the governing
statutes, the pertinent resolutions and ordinances of the Issuer, and any
trust indenture, mortgage, lease agreement or other contract relating to
the Bond or its security.
2. Noncancellability and Termination-Refunds of Premium
This Policy cannot be cancelled by AMBAC. The insurance provided by
this Policy shall remain in force throughout the Policy period. This
Policy provides for payment to the Trustee as a result of Nonpayment of
the Bonds. In the event the Trustee sells any of the Bonds, then this
Policy shall be terminated as to any such Bond on the date of said sale,
and AMBAC shall not have any liability under t his Policy on account of
Nonpayment of any such Bond occurring thereafter. This Policy shall be
terminated as to any Bond which AMBAC has been notified by the Sponsor or
by the Trustee has been redeemed from or sold by the Investment Trust, or
was not deposited by the Sponsor, or the contract to purchase which has
failed, on the date such notice is received by AMBAC, and AMBAC shall not
have any liability under this Policy on account of Nonpayment of any such
Bond occurring thereafter. When AMBAC is notified by the Trustee or the
Sponsor that any of the Bonds have been redeemed or sold from the
Investment Trust, or were not deposited into it, or a contract to
purchase any such Bonds has failed, a refund of any prepaid premium
thereof shall be made to the Investment Trust or the Sponsor, as the case
may be. Such notification to AMBAC must specify the amount of Bonds
affected, identify each by its Item Number in an Application identified
by its date and designate the date of such disposal or failure.
3. payment by Insurer-Amount, When and How Payable
(a) Amount-Payment by AMBAC of the aggregate of the face amount of
all Insured Instruments of the Investment Trust as to which there has
been a Nonpayment, reduced by the aggregate of: (i) the amount which the
Issuer shall have provided for payment of Insured Instruments by the time
of Nonpayment; and (ii) the amount which has been received from any other
source to pay Insured Instruments; such payment shall fully discharge
AMBAC from any further liability on account of the Nonpayment.
(b) When Payable-The payment due the Investment Trust shall be made
not later than thirty days after notice from the Trustee is received by
AMBAC that Nonpayment has occurred, but not earlier than the date on
which the Insured Instruments are Due for Payment.
(c) How Payable-The payment due the Investment Trust shall be paid
by AMBAC in exchange for delivery of Insured Instruments, not less in
face amount than the amount of the payment, in bearer form, free and
clear of all liens and encumbrances and uncancelled. In cases where an
Insured Instrument is issuable only in a form whereby principal is
payable to registered holders or their assigns, AMBAC shall pay principal
only upon presentation and surrender of the unpaid Insured Instrument,
uncancelled and free of any adverse claim, together with an instrument of
assignment, in satisfactory form, so as to permit ownership of such
Insured Instrument to be registered in the name of AMBAC or its nominee.
In cases where an Insured Instrument is issuable only in a form whereby
interest is payable to registered holders or their assigns, AMBAC shall
pay interest only upon presentation of proof that the claimant is the
person entitled to the pa shall pay interest only upon presentation of
proof that the claimant is the person entitled to the payment of interest
on the Insured Instrument and delivery of an instrument of assignment, in
satisfactory form, transferring to AMBAC all rights under such Insured
Instrument to receive the interest in respect of which the insurance
payment was made.
4. Rights of AMBAC
(a) Subrogation-When AMBAC has made payment with respect to an
Insured Instrument, it shall be subrogated to all of the rights to
payment of the Investment Trust thereon or in relation thereto to the
extent of such payment.
(b) Vesting of Rights and Powers-When AMBAC has made the payment
due to the Investment Trust as described in Condition 3, and until the
full amount of such payment has been recovered, AMBAC shall be vested
with all of the Investment Trust's options, votes, rights, powers and the
like under the Bond Proceedings. AMBAC shall not be liable to the
Investment Trust for any loss or damage resulting from the exercise of or
failure to exercise any of such options, votes, rights, powers and the
like.
(c) Exercise of Rights and Powers-AMBAC may, in its absolute
discretion, exercise or fail to exercise any option, vote, right, power
or the like it may have as holder or registered owner of an Insured
Instrument with respect to which it has made payment. AMBAC shall not be
liable to the Investment Trust for any loss or damage resulting therefrom
(d) Securing of Rights-The Trustee shall execute and deliver
instruments and do whatever else is necessary to secure the foregoing
rights for AMBAC, and will do nothing to prejudice them.
5. Payment of Insurance Premium Installments
The Trustee shall pay, when due, successively, the full amount of
each installment of the insurance premium. Each installment of the
insurance premium is due on or before the last day of the expiring
Premium Installment Period.
If AMBAC has not received such payment on or before such last day,
it shall give notice to the Sponsor to that effect. Such installment
shall be deemed to have been paid when due if AMBAC receives such payment
within ten days after it has given such notice.
The Trustee shall, with each payment, notify AMBAC of all Bonds
which, during the expiring Premium Installment period, were redeemed from
or sold by the Investment Trust, or the contract to purchase which
failed, or which have not been deposited by the Sponsor. Such
notification to AMBAC must specify the amounts of Bonds affected and
identify each by its Item Number in an Application identified by date.
No such notice need be given as to Bonds with respect to which AMBAC has
previously been notified to the same effect.
6. Where Notice is Given
All submissions, designations, payments, notices, reports and other
data or documents required to be submitted shall be mailed to AMBAC at
its administrative office, or to the Investment Trust at its address
shown on the face of this Policy or such other address as it shall
designate.
7. Waiver of Conditions
No permission affecting this insurance shall exist, or waiver of any
condition be valid, unless expressed in writing added hereto. Each of
the conditions of this Policy is hereby made severable, and waiver of one
condition is not a waiver of any other condition.
8. Suit
No suit or action on this Policy for the recovery of any amount
shall be sustained in any court of law or equity unless all of the
conditions of this Policy shall have been complied with (unless
specifically waived by AMBAC in writing) and unless commended within two
years after a Nonpayment.
9. Conflict of Laws
Any provision of this Policy which is on conflict with the laws of
the jurisdiction in which it is effective is hereby amended to conform
with the minimum requirements of such laws.
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation
AMBAC c/o CT Corporation Systems
Schedule of Bonds 44 East Mifflin Street
(a part of the Application and Policy) Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Administrative Office:
One State Street Plaza
New York, New York 10004
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors Quality
Tax Exempt Trust, Combined Multi Series 230
(Insured Municipals Income Trust, 94th Short Intermediate Series)
Date of Application: August 24, 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Item Par Full Name Purpose of Date Annual Initial
No. Value of Issuer Bonds Interest of Maturity Premium Annual
Rate Bonds Date Rate Premium
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1. $500M State of Various Purpose General 5.000% 08/01/94 08/01/99 .1300% $650.00
California Obligation Bonds (SMIP
Option Premium Rate: .62%
</TABLE>
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation
AMBAC c/o CT Corporation Systems
Schedule of Bonds 44 East Mifflin Street
(a part of the Application and Policy) Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Administrative Office:
One State Street Plaza
New York, New York 10004
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors Quality
Tax Exempt Trust, Combined Multi Series 230
(New York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 121)
Date of Application: August 24, 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Item Par Full Name Purpose of Date Annual Initial
No. Value of Issuer Bonds Interest of Maturity Premium Annual
Rate Bonds Date Rate Premium
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1. $200M New York State University Educational 6.000% 12/01/92 06/15/22 .2000% $400.00
State Facilities Revenue Bonds
Dormitory (State University of New
Authority York) Series 1992A (SMIP
Option Premium Rate: 1.17%)
</TABLE>
* Premium attributable to the original insured amount of each Item of Bonds.
Exhibit 1.5
Dated: June 1, 1992
Master Agreement Among Underwriters
For Unit Investment Trusts Sponsored by
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Gentlemen:
1. The Trust. We understand that you, Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
(the "Sponsor"), are entering into this agreement (the "Agreement") in
counterparts with us and other firms who may be underwriters for issues
of various series of unit investment trusts for which you will act as
Sponsor. This Agreement shall apply to any offering after May 1, 1992 of
units of fractional undivided interest in such various series unit
investment trusts in which we elect to act as an underwriter
(underwriters with respect to each such trust being hereinafter called
"Underwriters") after receipt of a notice from you stating the name and
size of the trust and that our participation as an Underwriter in the
proposed offering shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement.
The issuer of the units of fractional undivided interests in a series of
a unit investment trust offered in any offering of units made pursuant to
this Agreement is hereinafter referred to as the "Trust" and the
reference to "Trust" in this Agreement applies only to such Trust, and
such units of such Trust offered are hereinafter called the "Units".
Each Trust is or will be registered as a "unit investment trust" under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act") by appropriate
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission").
Additionally, each Trust is or will be registered with the Commission
under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") on Form S-6 or its
successor forms, including a proposed form of prospectus (the
"Preliminary Prospectus").
The registration statement as finally amended and revised at the
time it becomes effective is herein referred to as the "Registration
Statement" and the related prospectus is herein referred to as the
"Prospectus", except that if the prospectus filed by the Trust pursuant
to Rule 424(b) under the 1933 Act shall differ from the prospectus on
file at the time the Registration Statement shall become effective, the
term "Prospectus" shall refer to the prospectus filed pursuant to Rule
424(b) from and after the date on which it shall have been filed.
The following provisions of this Agreement shall apply separately to
each individual offering of Units by a Trust.
We understand that as of the date upon which we have agreed to
underwrite Units of the Trust the Commission shall not have issued any
order preventing or restraining the use of any Preliminary Prospectus
and, further, that each Preliminary Prospectus shall conform in all
material respects to the requirements of the 1933 Act and the Rules and
Regulations thereunder and, as of its date, shall not include any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements therein not misleading; and when the Registration
Statement becomes effective, it and the Prospectus, and any amendments or
supplements thereto, will contain all statements that are required to be
stated therein in accordance with the 1933 Act and the Rules and
Regulations thereunder and will in all material respects conform to the
requirements of the 1933 Act and the Rules and Regulations thereunder,
and neither the Registration Statement nor the Prospectus, nor any
amendment or supplement thereto, will contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading;
provided, however, that you make no representation or warranty as to
information contained in or omitted from any Preliminary Prospectus, the
Registration Statement, the Prospectus or any such amendment or
supplement, in reliance upon and in conformity with, written information
furnished to you by or on behalf of any Underwriter specifically for use
in the preparation thereof.
2. Designation and Authority of Representative. You are hereby
authorized to act as our representative (the "Representative") in
connection with all matters to which this Agreement relates and to take
the action provided herein to be taken by you as you may otherwise deem
necessary or advisable. We understand that we have no obligations under
this Agreement with respect to any Trust in which we choose not to
participate as an Underwriter.
You will be under no liability to us for any act or omission except
for obligations expressly assumed by you herein and no obligations on
your part will be implied or inferred herefrom. The rights and
liabilities of the respective parties hereto are several and not joint,
and nothing herein or hereunder will constitute then a partnership,
association or separate entity.
3. Profit or Loss in Acquisition of Securities. It is understood
that the acquisition of securities (the "Securities") for deposit in the
portfolio of the Trust shall be at your cost and risk. We acknowledge
that you will share with us any net deposit profits in the amounts and to
the extent, if any, indicated under "Sponsor and Underwriter
Compensation" in the Prospectus. For the purposes of determining the
number of Units underwritten, we understand that we will be credited for
that number of Units set forth opposite our name in the section entitled
"Underwriting" in the prospectus.
We agree that you shall have no liability (as Representative or
otherwise) with respect to the issue form, validity, legality,
enforceability, value of, or title to the Securities, except for the
exercise of due care in determining the genuineness of such Securities
and the conformance thereof with the descriptions and qualifications
appearing in the Prospectus.
4. Purchase of Units. Promptly after you make a determination to
offer Units of a Trust and you inquire as to whether we desire to
participate in such offering, we will advise you promptly as to the
number of Units which we will purchase or of our decision not to
participate in such offering. Such advice may be written or oral. The
delivery to the Sponsor of a completed Schedule A to this Agreement shall
constitute adequate written advice. Oral advice shall be binding but
shall be promptly confirmed in writing by us by means of telegraph,
telegram or other form of wire or facsimile transmission. Such written
confirmation shall contain the information requested by Schedule A to
this Agreement. You may rely on and we hereby commit on the terms and
conditions of this Agreement to purchase and pay for the number of Units
of the Trust set forth in such advice (the "Unit Commitment"). Our Unit
Commitment may be increased only by mutual agreement between us and you
at any time prior to the date as of which the Trust Agreement for the
Trust is executed (the "Date of Deposit"). We agree that you in your
sole discretion reserve the right to decrease our Unit Commitment at any
time prior to the Date of Deposit and if you so elect to make such a
decrease, you will notify us of such an election by telephone and
promptly confirm the same in writing.
The price to be paid for such Units shall be the Public Offering
Price per Unit (as defined in the Prospectus) as first determined on the
Date of Deposit or such later determination on such Date of Deposit as
you shall advise us, less the sum per Unit indicated under "Sponsor and
Underwriter Compensation" in the Prospectus. Further, each Underwriter
who underwrites that number of Units indicated under "Sponsor and
Underwriter Compensation" in the Prospectus will receive from the Sponsor
that additional compensation indicated under such section of the
Prospectus for each Unit it underwrites, providing the Trust size is in
excess of that number of Units, if any, indicated under such section of
the Prospectus. At the Date of Deposit, we will become the owner of the
Units and be entitled to the benefits (except for interest, if any,
accruing from the Date of Deposit to the First Settlement Date) as well
as the risks inherent therein. We acknowledge that those persons, if
any, named in the Prospectus under "Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation"
are Managing or Co-Managing Underwriters of the Trust, as indicated
therein, and we acknowledge that those persons specifically named therein
will receive as additional compensation those respective per Unit amounts
set forth in such section of the Prospectus.
You are authorized to retain custody of our Units until the
Registration Statement relating thereto has become effective under the
1933 Act and you shall have received payment from us for such Units.
You are authorized to file an amendment to said Registration
Statement describing the Securities and furnishing information based
thereon or relating thereto and any further amendments or supplements to
the Registration Statement or Prospectus which you may deem necessary or
advisable. We will furnish to you upon your request such information as
will be required to insure that the Registration Statement and Prospectus
are current insofar as they relate to us and we thereafter continue to
furnish you with such information as may be necessary to keep current and
correct the information previously supplied.
We understand that the Trust will also take action with respect to
the offering and sale of Units in accordance with the Blue Sky or
securities laws of certain states in which it is proposed that the Units
may be offered and sold.
5. Public Offering. You agree that you will advise us promptly
when the Registration Statement has become effective, and we agree that
when we are advised that the Units are released for public offering, we
will make a public offering thereof by means of the Prospectus under the
1933 Act, as amended, which describes the deposit of Securities and
related information. The Public Offering Price and the terms and
conditions of the public offering shall be as set forth in the Prospectus
and shall rely with respect to the offering price of the Securities upon
the determination of the Evaluator named in the Prospectus. Public
advertisement of the offering, if any, shall be made by you on behalf of
the Underwriters on such date as you shall determine. We agree that
before we use any Trust advertising material which we have created, we
will obtain your prior approval to use such advertising materials.
6. Public Offering Price. We agree that each day while this
Agreement is in effect and the evaluation of the Trust is made by the
Evaluator named in the Prospectus, we will contact you for such
evaluation and of the resultant Public Offering Price for the purpose of
the offering and sale of the respective Units to the public. We agree as
required by Section 22(d) of the 1940 Act to offer and sell our Units at
the current Public Offering Price described in the Prospectus.
7. Permitted Transactions. It is agreed that part or all of the
Units purchased by us may be sold to dealers, or other entities with whom
we can legally grant a concession or agency commission, only at the then
effective Public Offering Price, less the concession described in the
Prospectus.
From time to time prior to the termination of this Agreement, at
your Request, we will advise you of the number of our Units which remain
unsold and, at your request, we agree to deliver to you any of such
unsold Units to be sold for our account to retail accounts or, less the
concession or agency commission then effective, to dealers or others.
If prior to the termination of this Agreement, or such earlier date
as you may determine and advise us thereof in writing, you shall purchase
or contract to purchase any of our Units or any Units issued in exchange
therefor, in the open market or otherwise, or if any such Units shall be
tendered to the Trustee for redemption because not effectively placed for
investment by us, we agree to repurchase such Units at a price equal to
the total cost of such purchase, including accrued interest and
commissions, if any, and transfer taxes on redelivery. Regardless of the
amount paid on the repurchase of any such Units, it is agreed that they
may be resold by us only at the then effective Public Offering Price.
Until the termination of this Agreement, we agree that we will make
no purchase of Units other than (i) purchases provided for in this
Agreement, (ii) purchases approved by you and (iii) purchases as broker
in executing unsolicited orders.
8. Compliance With Commission Order. We hereby agree as follows:
(a) we will refund all sales charges to purchasers of Units from us or
any dealer participating in the distribution of Units who purchased such
Units from us if, within ninety days from the time that the Registration
Statement of the respective Units under the 1933 Act shall have become
effective, (i) the net worth of the trust shall be reduced to less than
20% of the principal amount of Securities originally deposited therein or
(ii) the Trust shall have been terminated; (b) you may instruct the
Trustee on the Date of Deposit that, in the event that redemption by any
Underwriters of Units constituting part of any unsold allotment of Units
shall result in the Trust having a net worth of less than 40% of the
principal amount of Securities originally deposited therein, the Trustee
shall terminate the Trust in the manner provided in the Trust Indenture
and Agreement (as defined in the Prospectus) and distribute the
Securities and other assets of the Trust pursuant to the provisions of
the Trust Indenture and Agreement; and (c) in the event that the Trust
shall have been terminated pursuant to (b) above, we will refund any
sales charges to any purchaser of such Units who purchased from us, or
purchased from a dealer participating in the distribution of such Units
who purchased such Units from us. We authorize you to charge our account
for all refunds of sales charges in respect to our Units.
9. Substitution of Underwriters. We authorize you to arrange for
the substitution hereunder of other persons, who may include you and us,
for all or any part of the commitment of any nondefaulting Underwriter
with the consent of such Underwriter, and of any defaulting Underwriter
without the consent thereof, upon such terms and conditions as you may
deem advisable, provided that the number of Units to be purchased by us
shall not be increased without our consent and that such substitution
shall not in any way affect the liability of any defaulting Underwriter
to the other Underwriters for damages from such default, nor relieve any
other Underwriter of any obligation under this Agreement. The expenses
chargeable to the account of any defaulting Underwriter and not paid for
by it or by a person substituted for such Underwriter and any additional
losses or expenses arising from such default shall be considered to be
expenses under this Agreement and shall be charged against the accounts
of the nondefaulting Underwriters in proportion to their respective
commitments.
10. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate with respect to
each Trust which we have agreed to underwrite 30 days after the date on
which the public offering of the Units of such Trust is made in
accordance with Section 5 hereof unless sooner terminated by you,
provided that you may extend this Agreement for not more than eleven
successive periods of 30 days each upon notice to us and each of the
other Underwriters.
Notwithstanding any settlement on the termination of this Agreement,
we agree to pay our share of any amount payable on account of any claim,
demand or liability which may be asserted against the Underwriters, or
any of them, based on the claim that the Underwriters constitute an
association, unincorporated business or other separate entity and our
share of any expenses incurred by you in defending against any such
claim, demand or liability. We also agree to pay any stamp taxes which
may be assessed and paid after such settlement on account of any Units
received or sold hereunder for our account.
Notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement, no sales of the
Units shall be made by us at any time except in conformity with the
provisions of Section 22(d) of the 1940 Act.
11. Default by Other Underwriters. Default by any one or more of
the other Underwriters in respect of their several obligations under this
Agreement shall neither release you nor us from any of our respective
obligations hereunder.
12. Notices. Notices hereunder shall by deemed to have been duly
given if mailed or telegraphed to us at our address set forth below, in
the case of notices to us, or to you at your address set forth at the
head of this Agreement, in the case of notices to you.
13. Net Capital. You represent that you, and we represent that we,
are in compliance with the capital requirements of Rule 15c-3-1
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, and we may, in accordance with and pursuant to such Rule 15c-3-1,
agree to purchase the amount of Units to be purchased by you and us,
respectively, under the Agreement.
14. Miscellaneous. We confirm that we are a member in good
standing of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
We confirm that we will take reasonable steps to provide the
Preliminary Prospectus or final Prospectus to any person making written
request therefor to us and to make the Preliminary Prospectus or the
final Prospectus available to each person associated with us expected to
solicit customers' orders for the Units prior to the effective
registration date and the final Prospectus if he is expected to offer the
Units after the effective date. We understand that you will supply us
upon our request with sufficient copies of such prospectuses to comply
with the foregoing.
This Agreement is being executed by us and delivered to you in
duplicate. Upon your confirmation hereof and of agreements in identical
form with each of the other Underwriters, this Agreement shall constitute
a valid and binding contract between us.
Very truly yours,
Confirmed as of the date set Indicated below our firm name
forth at the head of this Agreement and address exactly as we wish to
appear in the Prospectus
Van Kampen Merritt, Inc.
By____________________________ ____________________________________
Title__________________________ ____________________________________
____________________________________
Exhibit 3.1
Chapman and Cutler
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
August 24, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Re: Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230
Gentlemen:
We have served as counsel for Van Kampen Merritt Inc., Sponsor and
Depositor of Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-
Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 (hereinafter referred to as the "Fund"),
in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of a Trust
Agreement dated August 24, 1994 between Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as
Depositor, American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van
Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of
New York, as Trustee, pursuant to which the Depositor has delivered to
and deposited Bonds listed in the Schedules to the Trust Agreement with
the Trustee and pursuant to which the Trustee has issued to or on the
order of the Depositor a certificate or certificates representing Units
of fractional undivided interest in and ownership of the several Trusts
of said Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "Units") created under said
Trust Agreement.
In connection therewith, we have examined such pertinent records and
documents and matters of law as we have deemed necessary in order to
enable us to express the opinions hereinafter set forth.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:
1. The execution and delivery of the Trust Agreement and the
execution and issuance of certificates evidencing the Units in the
several Trusts of the Fund have been duly authorized; and
2. The certificates evidencing the Units in the several
Trusts of the Fund when duly executed and delivered by the Depositor
and the Trustee in accordance with the aforementioned Trust
Agreement, will constitute valid and binding obligations of such
Trusts and the Depositor in accordance with the terms thereof.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement (File No. 33-54975) relating to the Units referred
to above and to the use of our name and to the reference to our firm in
said Registration Statement and in the related Prospectus.
Respectfully submitted,
Chapman and Cutler
MJK/ch
Exhibit 3.2
Chapman and Cutler
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
August 24, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
The Bank of New York
Unit Investment Trust Division
101 Barclay Street
New York, New York 10286
Re: Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230
______________________________________________
Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel for Van Kampen Merritt Inc., Depositor of
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 230 (the "Fund"), in connection with the issuance of Units
of fractional undivided interest in the several Trusts of said Fund under
a Trust Agreement dated August 24, 1994 (the "Indenture") between Van
Kampen Merritt Inc., as Depositor, American Portfolio Evaluation
Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., as
Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
In this connection, we have examined the Registration Statement, the
form of Prospectus proposed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Indenture and such other instruments and documents as we
have deemed pertinent.
Based upon the foregoing and upon an investigation of such matters
of law as we consider to be applicable, we are of the opinion that, under
existing Federal income tax law:
(i) Each Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation
but will be governed by the provisions of subchapter J (relating to
trusts) of chapter 1, Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code").
(ii) Each Unitholder will be considered as owning a pro rata
share of each asset of the respective Trust in the proportion that
the number of Units of such Trust held by him bears to the total
number of Units outstanding of such Trust. Under subpart E,
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code, income of each Trust will be
treated as income of each Unitholder of the respective Trust in the
proportion described, and an item of Trust income will have the same
character in the hands of a Unitholder as it would have in the hands
of the Trustee. Accordingly, to the extent that the income of a
Trust consists of interest excludable from gross income under
Section 103 of the Code, such income will be excludable from Federal
gross income of the Unitholders, except in the case of a Unitholder
who is a substantial user (or a person related to such user) of a
facility financed through issuance of any industrial development
bonds or certain private activity bonds held by the respective
Trust. In the case of such Unitholder (and no other) interest
received with respect to his Units attributable to such industrial
development bonds or such private activity bonds is includable in
his gross income. In the case of certain corporations, interest on
the Bonds is included in computing the alternative minimum tax
pursuant to Section 56(c) of the Code, the environmental tax (the
"Superfund Tax") imposed by Section 59A of the Code, and the branch
profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code with respect to U.S.
branches of foreign corporations.
(iii) Gain or loss will be recognized to a Unitholder upon
redemption or sale of his Units. Such gain or loss is measured by
comparing the proceeds of such redemption or sale with the adjusted
basis of the Units represented by his Certificate. Before
adjustment, such basis would normally be cost if the Unitholder had
acquired his Units by purchase, plus his aliquot share of advances
by the Trustee to the Trust to pay interest on Bonds delivered after
the Unitholder's settlement date to the extent that such interest
accrued on the Bonds during the period from the Unitholder's
settlement date to the date such Bonds are delivered to the
respective Trust, but only to the extent that such advances are to
be repaid to the Trustee out of interest received by such Trust with
respect to such Bonds. In addition, such basis will be increased by
the Unitholder's aliquot share of the accrued original issue
discount with respect to each Bond held by the Trust with respect to
which there was an original issue discount at the time the Bond was
issued and reduced by the annual amortization of bond premium, if
any, on Bonds held by the Trust.
(iv) If the Trustee disposes of a Trust asset (whether by sale,
payment on maturity, redemption or otherwise) gain or loss is
recognized to the Unitholder and the amount thereof is measured by
comparing the Unitholder's aliquot share of the total proceeds from
the transaction with his basis for his fractional interest in the
asset disposed of. Such basis is ascertained by apportioning the
tax basis for his Units among each of the Trust assets (as of the
date on which his Units were acquired) ratably according to their
values as of the valuation date nearest the date on which he
purchased such Units. A Unitholder's basis in his Units and of his
fractional interest in each Trust asset must be reduced by the
amount of his aliquot share of interest received by the Trust, if
any, on Bonds delivered after the Unitholder's settlement date to
the extent that such interest accrued on the Bonds during the period
from the Unitholder's settlement date to the date such Bonds are
delivered to the Trust, must be reduced by the annual amortization
of bond premium, if any, on Bonds held by the Trust and must be
increased by the Unitholder's share of the accrued original issue
discount with respect to each Bond which, at the time the Bond was
issued, had original issue discount.
(v) In the case of any Bond held by the Trust where the
"stated redemption price at maturity" exceeds the "issue price",
such excess shall be original issue discount. With respect to each
Unitholder, upon the purchase of his Units subsequent to the
original issuance of Bonds held by the Trust, Section 1272(a)(7) of
the Code provides for a reduction in the accrued "daily portion" of
such original issue discount upon the purchase of a Bond subsequent
to the Bond's original issue, under certain circumstances. In the
case of any Bond held by the Trust the interest on which is
excludable from gross income under Section 103 of the Code, any
original issue discount which accrues with respect thereto will be
treated as interest which is excludable from gross income under
Section 103 of the Code.
(vi) We have examined the Municipal Bond Unit Investment Trust
Insurance policies, if any, issued to certain of the Trusts on the
Date of Deposit by AMBAC Indemnity Corporation, Financial Guaranty
Insurance Corporation or a combination thereof. Each such policy,
or a combination of such policies, insures all bonds held by the
Trustee for that particular Trust (other than bonds described in
paragraph (vii)) against default in the prompt payment of principal
and interest. In our opinion, any amount paid under each said
policy, or a combination of said policies, which represents maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be
excludable from federal gross income if, and to the same extent as,
such interest would have been so excludable if paid by the issuer of
the defaulted bonds provided that, at the time such policies are
purchased, the amounts paid for such policies are reasonable,
customary and consistent with the reasonable expectation that the
issuer of the bonds, rather than the insurer, will pay debt service
on the bonds. Paragraph (ii) of this opinion is accordingly
applicable to insurance proceeds representing maturing interest.
(vii) Certain bonds in the portfolios of certain of the Insured
Trusts have been insured by the issuers thereof against default in
the prompt payment of principal and interest. Insurance has been
obtained for such bonds, or, in the case of a commitment, the bonds
will be ultimately insured under the terms of such an insurance
policy, which are designated as issuer insured bonds on the
portfolio pages of the respective Trusts in the prospectus for the
Fund, by the issuer of such bonds. Insurance obtained by the issuer
is effective so long as such bonds remain outstanding. For each of
these bonds, we have been advised that the aggregate principal
amount of such bonds listed on the portfolio page for the respective
Trust was acquired by the applicable Trust and are part of the
series of such bonds listed on the portfolio page for the respective
Trust in the aggregate principal amount listed on the portfolio page
for the respective Trust. Based upon the assumption that the bonds
acquired by the applicable Trust are part of the series covered by
an insurance policy or, in the case of a commitment, will be
ultimately insured under the terms of such an insurance policy, it
is our opinion that any amounts received by the applicable Trust
representing maturing interest on such bonds will be excludable from
federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest
would have been so excludable if paid in normal course by the Issuer
of the defaulted bonds provided that, at the time such policies
are purchased, the amounts paid for such policies are reasonable,
customary and consistent with the reasonable expectation that the
issuer of the bonds, rather than the insurer, will pay debt service
on the bonds. Paragraph (ii) of this opinion is accordingly
applicable to such payment.
Sections 1288 and 1272 of the Code provide a complex set of rules
governing the accrual of original issue discount. These rules provide
that original issue discount accrues either on the basis of a constant
compound interest rate or ratably over the term of the Bond, depending on
the date the Bond was issued. In addition, special rules apply if the
purchase price of a Bond exceeds the original issue price plus the amount
of original issue discount which would have previously accrued based upon
its issue price (its "adjusted issue price") to prior owners. The
application of these rules will also vary depending on the value of the
bond on the date a Unitholder acquires his Units, and the price the
Unitholder pays for his Units.
Because the Trusts do not include any "private activity" bonds
within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code issued on or after August
15, 1986, none of the Trust Fund's interest income shall be treated as an
item of tax preference when computing the alternative minimum tax. In
the case of corporations, for taxable years beginning after December 31,
1986, the alternative minimum tax and the Superfund Tax depend upon the
corporation's taxable income with certain adjustments.
Pursuant to Section 56(c) of the Code, one of the adjustment items
used in computing alternative minimum taxable income ("AMTI") and the
Superfund Tax of a corporation (other than an S corporation, Regulated
Investment Company, Real Estate Investment Trust or REMIC) for taxable
years beginning after 1989, is an amount equal to 75% of the excess of
such corporation's "adjusted current earnings" over an amount equal to
its AMTI (before such adjustment item and the alternative tax net
operating loss deduction). "Adjusted current earnings" includes, all tax-
exempt interest, including interest on all Bonds in the Trust, and tax-
exempt original issue discount.
Effective for tax returns filed after December 31, 1987, all
taxpayers are required to disclose to the Internal Revenue Service the
amount of tax-exempt interest earned during the year.
Section 265 of the Code provides for a reduction in each taxable
year of 100 percent of the otherwise deductible interest on indebtedness
incurred or continued by financial institutions, to which either Section
585 or Section 593 of the Code applies, to purchase or carry obligations
acquired after August 7, 1986, the interest on which is exempt from
Federal income taxes for such taxable year. Under rules prescribed by
Section 265, the amount of interest otherwise deductible by such
financial institutions in any taxable year which is deemed to be
attributable to tax-exempt obligations acquired after August 7, 1986,
will be the amount that bears the same ratio to the interest deduction
otherwise allowable (determined without regard to Section 265) to the
taxpayer for the taxable year as the taxpayer's average adjusted basis
(within the meaning of Section 1016) of tax-exempt obligations acquired
after August 7, 1986, bears to such average adjusted basis for all assets
of the taxpayer, unless such financial institution can otherwise
establish, under regulations, to be prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury, the amount of interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to
purchase or carry such obligations.
We also call attention to the fact that, under Section 265 of the
Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry
Units is not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. Under rules
used by the Internal Revenue Service for determining when borrowed funds
are considered used for the purpose of purchasing or carrying particular
assets, the purchase of Units may be considered to have been made with
borrowed funds even though the borrowed funds are not directly traceable
to the purchase of Units. However, these rules generally do not apply to
interest paid on indebtedness incurred for expenditures of a personal
nature such as a mortgage incurred to purchase or improve a personal
residence.
"The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993" (the "Tax Act") subjects
tax-exempt bonds to the market discount rules of the Code effective for
bonds purchased after April 30, 1993. In general, market discount is the
amount (if any) by which the stated redemption price at maturity exceeds
an investor's purchase price (except to the extent that such difference,
if any, is attributable to original issue discount not yet accrued).
Market discount can arise based on the price a Trust pays for Bonds or
the price a Unitholder pays for his or her Units. Under the Tax Act,
accretion of market discount is taxable as ordinary income; under prior
law, the accretion had been treated as capital gain. Market discount
that accretes while a Trust holds a Bond would be recognized as ordinary
income by the Unitholders when principal payments are received on the
Bond, upon sale or at redemption (including early redemption), or upon
the sale or redemption of his or her Units, unless a Unitholder elects to
include market discount in taxable income as it accrues.
We have also examined certain laws of the State of Florida, to
determine their applicability to the Florida IM-IT 83 Trust (the "Florida
Trust") being created as part of the Fund and to the holders of Units in
the Florida Trust who are residents of the State of Florida. "Non-
Corporate Unitholder" means a Unitholder of the Florida Trust who is an
individual not subject to the Florida state income tax on corporations
under Chapter 220, Florida Statutes and "Corporate Unitholder" means a
Unitholder of the Florida Trusts that is a corporation, bank or savings
association subject to the Florida state income tax on corporations or
franchise tax imposed on banks or savings associations under Chapter 220,
Florida Statutes.
Although we express no opinion with respect thereto, in rendering
the opinion expressed herein, we have assumed that the Bonds were validly
issued by the State of Florida or its instrumentalities or
municipalities. Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that:
(a) Neither the Florida Trust nor Non-Corporate Unitholders
will be subject to the Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220,
Florida Statutes. Therefore, any amounts paid to the Florida Trusts
or Non-Corporate Unitholders under an insurance policy issued to the
Florida Trusts, the Issuers, the Underwriters, or the Sponsors
thereof, or others, which represent maturing interest on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee will not be subject to the Florida
income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida Statutes.
(b) Corporate Unitholders will be subject to Florida income or
franchise taxation under Chapter 220, Florida Statutes (1) on
interest received by the Trust, (2) on payments of interest pursuant
to any insurance policy, (3) on gain realized when Bonds are sold,
redeemed or paid at maturity or when insurance payments with respect
to principal are received by the Trust and (4) on gain on the sale
or redemption of Units, to the extent allocable to Florida as
"adjusted federal income." Corporate Unitholders that have a
commercial domicile in Florida will also be subject to Florida
income or franchise taxation on 100 percent of the items of income
described in clauses (1) through (4) of the immediately preceding
sentence to the extent that such income constitutes "nonbusiness
income."
(c) Even if interest on indebtedness incurred or continued by
a Unitholder to purchase Units in the Trust is not deductible for
Federal income tax purposes, it will reduce interest income on the
Bonds which is reportable by Corporate Unitholders for Florida
income tax purposes.
(d) Trust Units held by a Florida resident will be includible
in the resident's estate for Florida estate tax purposes, but if
such estate is not subject to the Federal estate tax, the estate
will not be subject to the Florida estate tax. The Florida estate
tax is limited to the amount of the credit for state death taxes
provided for in section 2011 of the Code, less estate taxes paid to
states other than Florida.
(e) Neither the Bonds nor the Units will be subject to the
Florida ad valorem tax, the Florida intangible personal property tax
or Florida sales or use tax.
We understand that the Hawaii Trust will only have income consisting
of (i) interest from bonds issued by the State of Hawaii and its
political and governmental subdivisions, municipalities and governmental
agencies and instrumentalities and bonds issued by possessions of the
United States which would be exempt from federal and Hawaii income
taxation when paid directly to an individual, trust or estate (the
"Bonds"), (ii) gain on the disposition of such Bonds, and (iii) proceeds
paid under certain insurance policies issued to the Trustee or to the
issuers of the Bonds which represent maturing interest or principal
payments on defaulted Bonds held by the Trustee.
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the
Bonds to be deposited in and held in the Trust. However, although no
opinion is expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that:
(i) the Bonds were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is
excludible from gross income for federal income tax purposes and (iii)
the interest thereon is exempt from income tax imposed by Hawaii that is
applicable to individuals, trusts and estates (the "Hawaii Income Tax").
It should be noted that interest on the Bonds is subject to tax in the
case of certain banks and financial institutions subject to Hawaii's
franchise tax and corporations subject to Hawaii's corporate alternative
minimum tax. The opinion set forth below does not address the taxation
of persons other than full time residents of Hawaii.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, Counsel to the Sponsor, under
existing Hawaii income tax law as of the date of this prospectus and
based upon the assumptions above:
(1) The Hawaii Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation and each Unitholder of the Hawaii Trust will be treated
as the owner of a pro rata portion of the Hawaii Trust, and the
income of such portion of the Hawaii Trust will therefore be treated
as the income of the Unitholder for Hawaii Income Tax purposes;
(2) Income on the Bonds which is exempt from the Hawaii Income
Tax when received by a Unitholder of the Hawaii Trust and which
would be exempt from the Hawaii Income Tax if received directly by a
Unitholder, will retain its status as exempt from such tax when
received by the Hawaii Trust and distributed to such Unitholder;
(3) To the extent that interest on the Bonds, if any, is
includible in the computation of "alternative minimum taxable
income" for federal income tax purposes, such interest will also be
includible in the computation of "alternative minimum taxable
income" for purposes of Hawaii's corporate alternative minimum tax
on corporations;
(4) Each Unitholder of the Hawaii Trust will recognize gain or
loss for Hawaii Income Tax purposes if the Trustee disposes of a
Bond (whether by redemption, sale or otherwise) or if the Unitholder
redeems or sells Units of the Hawaii Trust to the extent that such a
transaction results in a recognized gain or loss to such Unitholder
for federal income tax purposes;
(5) Tax cost reduction requirements relating to amortization
of bond premium may, under some circumstances, result in Unitholders
realizing taxable gain for Hawaii Income Tax purposes when their
Units are sold or redeemed for an amount equal to or less than their
original cost;
(6) Proceeds, if any, paid under individual insurance policies
obtained by issuers of Bonds or the Trustee which represent maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be
excludible from Hawaii net income if, and to the same extent as,
such interest would have been so excludible if paid in the normal
course by the issuer of the defaulted obligation provided that, at
the time such policies are purchased, the amounts paid for such
policies are reasonable, customary and consistent with the
reasonable expectation that the issuer of the bonds, rather than the
insurer, will pay debt service on the bonds; and
(7) To the extent that interest derived from the Hawaii Trust
by a Unitholder with respect to any Possession Bonds is excludible
from gross income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to 48
U.S.C. Section 745, 48 U.S.C. Section 1423a and 48 U.S.C. Section
1403, such interest will also not be subject to the Hawaii Income
Tax. It should be noted that interest relating to Possession Bonds
is subject to tax in the case of certain banks and financial
institutions subject to the Hawaii's franchise tax and corporations
subject to Hawaii's corporate alternative minimum tax.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in
the Hawaii Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the
opinions of bond counsel with respect thereto, and therefore express no
opinion as to the exemption from State income taxes of interest on the
Bonds if received directly by a Unitholder.
We have also examined certain laws of the State of Oregon, to
determine their applicability to the Oregon Quality Trust (the "Oregon
Trust") being created as part of the Fund and to the holders of Units in
the Oregon Trust who are residents of the State of Oregon ("Oregon
Unitholder"). The assets of the Oregon Trust will consist of interest-
bearing obligations issued by or on behalf of the State of Oregon (the
"State") or counties, municipalities, authorities or political
subdivisions thereof ("Oregon Bonds") or by the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, Guam and the United States Virgin Islands (the "Possession Bonds")
(collectively the "Bonds"). Although no opinion is expressed herein
regarding such matters, it is assumed that: (i) the Bonds were validly
issued, (ii) the interest thereon is excludible from gross income for
federal income tax purposes and (iii) interest on the Bonds, if received
directly by a Unitholder, would be exempt from the Oregon income tax
applicable to individual, ("Oregon Personal Income Tax"). The opinion
set forth below does not address the taxation of persons other than full
time residents of Oregon.
Based on the foregoing, and based on review and consideration of
existing laws of the State as of this date, it is our opinion and we
herewith advise you, as follows:
(1) The Oregon Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation and based upon an administrative rule of the Oregon
State Department of Revenue, each Oregon Unitholder of the Trust
will be essentially treated as the owner of a pro rata portion of
the Oregon Trust and the income of such portion of the Oregon Trust
will be treated as the income of the Oregon Unitholder for Oregon
Personal Income Tax purposes;
(2) interest on the Bonds which is exempt from the Oregon
Personal Income Tax when received by the Oregon Trust, and which
would be exempt from the Oregon Personal Income Tax if received
directly by an Oregon Unitholder, will retain its status as exempt
from such tax when received by the Oregon Trust and distributed to
an Oregon Unitholder;
(3) to the extent that interest derived from the Oregon Trust
by an Oregon Unitholder with respect to the Possession Bonds is
excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes
pursuant to 48 U.S.C. 745, 48 U.S.C. 1423a and 48 U.S.C. 1403,
such interest will not be subject to the Oregon Personal Income Tax;
(4) each Oregon Unitholder of the Oregon Trust will recognize
gain or loss for Oregon Personal Income Tax purposes if the Trustee
disposes of a bond (whether by redemption, sale or otherwise) or if
the Oregon Unitholder redeems or sells Units of the Oregon Trust to
the extent that such a transaction results in a recognized gain or
loss to such Oregon Unitholder for Federal income tax purposes; and
(5) the Oregon Personal Income Tax does not permit a deduction
of interest paid or incurred on indebtedness incurred or continued
to purchase or carry Units in the Oregon Trust, the interest on
which is exempt from such Tax.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in
the Oregon Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the
opinions of bond counsel with respect thereto, and therefore express no
opinion as to the exemption from the Oregon Personal Income Tax of
interest on the Bonds if received directly by a Unitholder. In addition,
prospective purchasers subject to the Oregon corporate income tax should
be advised that for purposes of the Oregon Corporate Income (Excise) Tax,
interest on the Oregon Bonds received by the Oregon Trust and distributed
to an Oregon Unitholder subject to such tax will be added to the
corporate Oregon Unitholder's federal taxable income and therefore will
be taxable.
We have also examined the income tax law of the Commonwealth of
Virginia ("Virginia"), which is based upon the Federal Law, to determine
its applicability to the Virginia Quality Trust (the "Virginia Trust")
being created as part of the Fund and to the holders of Units in the
Virginia Trust who are residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia
("Virginia Unitholders").
The assets of the Virginia Trust will consist of interest-bearing
obligations issued by or on behalf of Virginia ("Virginia") or counties,
municipalities, authorities or political subdivisions thereof (the
"Bonds"). Although we express no opinion with respect to the issuance of
the Bonds, in rendering our opinion expressed herein, we have assumed
that: (i) the Bonds were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is
excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and (iii)
the interest thereon is exempt from income tax imposed by Virginia that
is applicable to individuals and corporations (the "Virginia Income
Tax"). This opinion does not address the taxation of persons other than
full time residents of Virginia. Based upon the foregoing it is our
opinion that under Virginia income tax law, as presently enacted and
construed:
(a) The Virginia Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation for Virginia income tax purposes and each Unitholder of
the Virginia Trust will be treated as the owner of a pro rata
portion of the assets held by the Virginia Trust and the income of
such portion of the assets held by the Virginia Trust will be
treated as income of the Unitholder for purposes of the Virginia
Income Tax.
(b) Income on the Bonds which is exempt from Virginia Income
Tax when received by the Virginia Trust, and which would be exempt
from Virginia Income Tax if received directly by a Unitholder, will
retain its status as exempt from such tax when received by the
Virginia Trust and distributed to such Unitholder.
(c) Each Unitholder will recognize gain or loss for purposes
of the Virginia Income Tax if the Trustee disposes of a bond
(whether by redemption, sale or otherwise) or if the Unitholder
redeems or sells Units of the Virginia Trust to the extent that such
a transaction results in a recognized gain or loss to such
Unitholder for federal income tax purposes, except as described in
this paragraph. Virginia law provides that all income from certain
tax-exempt obligations issued under the laws of Virginia, including
any profits made from the sale of such Bonds, shall be exempt from
all taxation by Virginia. Although we express no opinion, the
Virginia Department of Taxation has indicated that the gains
recognized for federal income tax purposes on such tax-exempt
obligations would not be subject to Virginia Income Taxation.
Accordingly, any such gain relating to the disposition of any Bond
that would not be subject to Virginia Income Tax if the Bond was
held directly by a Unitholder will retain its tax-exempt status for
purposes of the Virginia Income Tax when the Bond is disposed of by
the Virginia Trust or when the Unitholder is deemed to have disposed
of his pro rata portion of such Bond upon the disposition of his
Unit provided that such gain can be determined with reasonable
certainty and subtantiated.
(d) The Virginia Income Tax does not permit a deduction of
interest paid on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or
carry Units in the Virginia Trust to the extent that interest income
related to the Ownership of Units is exempt from Virginia Income
Tax.
In the case of Unitholders subject to the Virginia Bank Franchise
Tax, the income derived by such a Unitholder from his pro rata portion of
the Bonds held by the Virginia Trust may affect the determination of such
Unitholder's Bank Franchise Tax. Prospective investors should consult
their tax advisors.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in
the Virginia Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the
opinions of the bond counsel with respect thereto, and therefore express
no opinion as to the exemption from Virginia Income Tax of interest on
the Virginia Bonds if received directly by a Unitholder. In addition, we
express no opinion with respect to any taxes or items other than those
described above.
Very truly yours,
Chapman and Cutler
MJK/ch
Exhibit 3.3
Tanner Propp & Farber
99 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10016
August 24, 1994
Insured Municipals Income Trust and
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 230
c/o The Bank of New York,
As Trustee
101 Barclay Street, 17 West
New York, New York 10286
Dear Sirs:
We have acted as special counsel for the Insured Municipals Income
Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 (the
"Fund") consisting of Insured Municipals Income Trust, 76th Limited
Maturity Series, Insured Municipals Income Trust, 94th Short Intermediate
Series, California Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 131, Florida
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 83, Michigan Insured Municipals
Income Trust, Series 119, New York Insured Municipals Income Trust,
Series 121, Hawaii Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 1, Oregon
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 53 and Virginia Investors'
Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 61 (in the aggregate the "Trusts" and
individually "Trusts") for the purpose of determining the applicability
of certain New York taxes under the circumstances hereinafter described.
The Fund is created pursuant to a Trust Agreement (the
"Indenture"), dated as of today (the "Date of Deposit") among Van Kampen
Merritt Inc. (the "Depositor"), American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a
division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator,
and The Bank of New York as Trustee (the "Trustee"). As described in the
prospectus relating to the Fund dated today to be filed as an amendment
to a registration statement previously filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (file number 33-54975) under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Prospectus"), the objectives of the Fund are the
generation of income exempt from Federal taxation and as regards each
Trust denominated with the name of a state exempt from income tax, if
any, of the denominated in the name of that Trust to the extent indicated
in the Prospectus. No opinion is expressed herein with regard to the
Federal or State tax aspects of the bonds, the Fund, and units of the
Trust (the "Units"), or any interest, gains or losses in respect thereof.
As more fully set forth in the Indenture and in the Prospectus, the
activities of the Trustee will include the following:
On the Date of Deposit, the Depositor will deposit with the Trustee
with respect to each Trusts, the total principal amount of interest
bearing obligations and/or contracts for the purchase thereof together
with an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount required for the
purchase price and accrued interest, if any, and, in the case of Trusts
denominated as "Insured," an insurance policy purchased by the Depositor
evidencing the insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and
interest of the obligations comprising the corpus of that Trust other
than those obligations the timely payment of principal and interest of
which are guaranteed by an insurance policy purchased by the issuer
thereof or a prior owner, which may include the Depositor prior to the
Date of Deposit, as more fully set forth in the Prospectus with respect
to each Trust.
We understand with respect to the obligations described in the
preceding paragraph that all insurance, whether purchased by the
Depositor, the issuer or a prior owner, provides, or will provide, that
the amount paid by the insurer in respect of any bond may not exceed the
amount of principal and interest due on the bond and such payment will in
no event relieve the issuer from its continuing obligation to pay such
defaulted principal and interest in accordance with the terms of the
obligation.
The Trustee will not participate in the selection of the obligations
to be deposited in the Fund, and, upon the receipt thereof, will deliver
to the Depositor a registered certificate for the number of Units
representing the entire capital of each of the Trusts as more fully set
forth in the Prospectus and the Registration Statement. The Units, which
are represented by certificates ("Certificates"), will be offered to the
public by the Prospectus upon the effectiveness of the Registration
Statement.
The duties of the Trustee, which are ministerial in nature, will
consist primarily of crediting the appropriate accounts with interest
received by each of the Trusts and with the proceeds from the disposition
of obligations held in each of the Trusts and the distribution of such
interest and proceeds to the Unit holders of that Trust. The Trustee
will also maintain records of the registered holders of Certificates
representing an interest in each Trust and administer the redemption of
Units by such Certificate holders and may perform certain administrative
functions with respect to an automatic investment option.
Generally, obligations held in the Fund may be removed therefrom by
the Trustee only upon redemption prior to their stated maturity, at the
direction of the Depositor in the event of an advance refunding, or upon
the occurrence of certain other specified events which adversely affect
the sound investment character of the Fund, such as default by the issuer
in payment of interest or principal on the obligation and no provision
for payment is made therefor either pursuant to the portfolio insurance
or otherwise and the Depositor fails to instruct the Trustee, within
thirty (30) days after notification, to hold such obligation.
Prior to the termination of the Fund, the Trustee is empowered to
sell Bonds, from a list furnished by the Evaluator, only for the purpose
of redeeming Units tendered to it and of paying expenses for which funds
are not available. The Trustee does not have the power to vary the
investment of any Unit holder in the Fund, and under no circumstances may
the proceeds of sale of any obligations held by the Fund be used to
purchase new obligations to be held therein.
Article 9-A of the New York Tax Law imposes a franchise tax on
business corporations, and, for purposes of that Article, Section 208(l)
defines the term "corporation" to include, among other things, "any
business conducted by a trustee or trustees wherein interest or ownership
is evidenced by certificate or other written instrument."
The Regulations promulgated under Section 208 provide as follows:
The term "trust" includes any business conducted by a
trustee or trustees in which interest or ownership is
evidenced by certificate or other written instrument.
Such a trust includes, but is not limited to, an
association commonly referred to as a "business
trust" or "Massachusetts trust." In determining
whether a trustee or trustees are conducting a
business, the form of the agreement is of
significance but is not controlling. The actual
activities of the trustee or trustees, not their
purposes and powers, will be regarded as decisive
factors in determining whether a trust is subject to
tax under Article 9-A. The mere investment of funds
and the collection of income therefrom, with
incidental replacement of securities and reinvestment
of funds, does not constitute the conduct of a
business in the case of a business conducted by the
trustee or trustees. 20 NYCRR 1-2.3(b)(2) (July 11,
1990).
New York cases dealing with the question of whether a trust will be
subject to the franchise tax have also delineated the general rule that
where a trustee merely invests funds and collects and distributes the
income therefrom, the trust is not engaged in business and is not subject
to the franchise tax. Burrell v. Lynch, 274 A.D. 347, 84 N.Y.S.2d 171
(3rd Dept. 1948), order resettled, 274 A.D. 1073, 85 N.Y.S.2d 705 (1949).
An opinion of the Attorney General of the State of New York, 47 N.Y.
Atty. Gen. Rep. 213 (Nov. 24, 1942), it was held that where the trustee
of an unincorporated investment trust was without authority to reinvest
amounts received upon the sales of securities and could dispose of
securities making up the trust only upon the happening of certain
specified events or the existence of certain specified conditions, the
trust was not subject to the franchise tax.
In the instant situation, the Trustee is not empowered to sell
obligations contained in the corpus of the Fund and reinvest the proceeds
therefrom. Further, the power to sell such obligations is limited to
circumstances in which the creditworthiness or soundness of the
obligation is in question or in which cash is needed to pay redeeming
Unit holders or to pay expenses, or where the Fund is liquidated pursuant
to the termination of the Indenture. Only in circumstances in which the
issuer of an obligation attempts to refinance it can the Trustee exchange
an obligation for a new security. In substance, the Trustee will merely
collect and distribute income and will not reinvest any income or
proceeds, and the Trustee has no power to vary the investment of any Unit
holder in a Trust.
Under Subpart E of Part I, Subchapter J of Chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the grantor of a trust
will be deemed to be the owner of the trust under certain circumstances,
and therefore taxable on his proportionate interest in the income
thereof. Where this Federal tax rule applies, the income attributed to
the grantor will also be income to him for New York income tax purposes.
See TSB-M-78(9)(c), New York Department of Taxation and Finance June 23,
1978.
By letter, dated today, Messrs. Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the
Depositor, rendered their opinion that each Unit holder of a Trust will
be considered as owning a share of each asset of that Trust in the
proportion that the number of Units held by such holder bears to the
total number of Units outstanding and the income of a Trust will be
treated as the income of each Unit holder of that Trust in said
proportion pursuant to Subpart E of Part E, subchapter J of Chapter 1 of
the Code.
Based on the foregoing and on the opinion of Messrs. Chapman and
Cutler, counsel for the Depositor, dated today, upon which we
specifically rely, we are of the opinion that under existing laws,
rulings and court decisions interpreting the laws of the State and City
of New York.
1. Each Trust will not constitute an association taxable as a
corporation under New York law and, accordingly, will not be subject to
tax on its income under the New York franchise tax or the New York City
general corporation tax.
2. The income of each of the Trusts will be treated as the income
of the Unit holders under the income tax laws of the State and City of
New York.
3. Unit holders who are not residents of the State of New York are
not subject to the income tax laws thereof with respect to any interest
or gain derived from the Fund or any gain from the sale or other
disposition of the Units, except to the extent that such interest or gain
is from property employed in a business, trade, profession or occupation
carried on in the State of New York.
In addition, we are of the that opinion no New York State stock
transfer tax will be payable in respect of any transfer of the
Certificates by reason of the exemption contained in paragraph (a) of
Subdivision 8 of Section 270 of the New York Tax Law.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement relating to the Units and to the use of our name
and the reference to our firm in the Registration Statement and in the
Prospectus.
Very truly yours,
Tanner Propp & Farber
MJK:clh
Exhibit 3.4
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Old Federal Reserve Bank Building
400 Sansome Street
San Francisco, California 94111
August 24, 1994
The Bank of New York
through its Wall Street Trust Division
101 Barclay Street
New York, New York 10286
Re: California Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 131
Dear Sirs:
We have acted as special California counsel for Van Kampen Merritt
Inc., as Sponsor and Depositor of California Insured Municipals Income
Trust, Series 131 (the "Fund"), in connection with the issuance under the
Trust Indenture and Agreement dated August 24, 1994, among Van Kampen
Merritt Inc., as Sponsor and Depositor, American Portfolio Evaluation
Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., as
Evaluator, and The Bank of New York through its Wall Street Trust
division, as Trustee, of 3,053 Units of fractional undivided interest
in the Fund (the "Units") in exchange for certain bonds, as well as
"regular-way" and "when-issued" contracts for the purchase of bonds (such
bonds and contracts are hereinafter referred to collectively as the
"Securities").
In connection therewith, we have examined such corporate records,
certificates and other documents and such questions of law as we have
deemed necessary or appropriate for the purpose of this opinion, and, on
the basis of such examination, and upon existing provisions of the
Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, we are of the
opinion that:
1. The Fund is not an association taxable as a corporation
and the income of the Fund will be treated as the income of the
certificateholders under the income tax laws of California.
2. Amounts treated as interest on the underlying securities
which are exempt from tax under California personal income tax and
property tax laws when received by the Fund will, under such laws,
retain their status as tax-exempt interest when distributed to
certificateholders. However, interest on the underlying securities
attributed to a certificateholder which is a corporation subject to
the California franchise tax laws may be includable in its gross
income for purposes of determining its California franchise tax.
3. Under California income tax law, each certificateholder in
the Fund will have a taxable event when the Fund disposes of a
security (whether by sale, exchange, redemption, or payment at
maturity) or when the certificateholder redeems or sells Units.
Because of the requirement that tax cost basis be reduced to reflect
amortization of bond premium, under some circumstances a
certificateholder may realize taxable gain when Units are sold or
redeemed for an amount equal to, or less than, their original cost.
The total tax cost of each Unit to a certificateholder is allocated
among each of the bond issues held in the Fund (in accordance with
the proportion of the Fund comprised by each bond issue) in order to
determine his per unit tax cost for each bond issue; and the tax
cost reduction requirements relating to amortization of bond premium
will apply separately to the per unit cost of each bond issue.
Certificateholders' bases in their Units, and the bases for their
fractional interest in each Fund asset, may have to be adjusted for
their pro rata share of accrued interest received, if any, on
securities delivered after the certificateholders' respective
settlement dates.
4. Under the California personal property tax laws, bonds
(including the Securities) or any interest therein is exempt from
such tax.
5. Any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the
Trustee of the fund with respect to the Securities which represent
maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will
be exempt from California personal income tax if, and to the same
extent as, such interest would have been so exempt if paid by the
issuer of the defaulted obligations.
6. Under Section 17280(b)(2) of the California Revenue and
Taxation Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to
purchase or carry Units of the Trust is not deductible for the
purposes of the California personal income tax. While there
presently is no California authority interpreting this provision,
Section 17280(b)(2) directs the California Franchise Tax Board to
prescribe regulations determining the proper allocation and
apportionment of interest costs for this purpose. The Franchise Tax
Board has not yet proposed or prescribed such regulations. In
interpreting the generally similar Federal provision, the Internal
Revenue Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need
not be directly traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units
(although the Service has not contended that a deduction for
interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve a personal
residence or to purchase goods or services for personal consumption
will be disallowed). In the absence of conflicting regulations or
other California authority, the California Franchise Tax Board
generally has interpreted California statutory tax provisions in
accord with Internal Revenue Service interpretations of similar
Federal provisions.
Opinions relating to the validity of securities and the exemption of
interest thereon from State of California income tax are rendered by bond
counsel to the issuing authority at the time securities are issued and we
have relied solely upon such opinions, or, as to securities not yet
delivered, forms of such opinions contained in official statements
relating to such securities. Except in certain instances in which we
acted as bond counsel to issuers of securities, and as such made a review
of proceedings relating to the issuance of certain securities at the time
of their issuance, we have not made any review of proceedings relating to
the issuance of securities or the bases of bond counsels' opinions.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement (SEC No. 33-54975) relating to the Units referred
to above and to the use of our name and to the reference to our firm in
said Registration Statement and in the related Prospectus.
Very truly yours,
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Exhibit 3.5
Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone
1400 North Woodward Avenue, Suite 100
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48303-2014
August 24, 1994
Insured Municipals Income Trust and
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 230
In care of
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
The Bank of New York through
its Wall Street Trust division
as Trustee of the Insured Municipals
Income Trust and Investors'
Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 230
101 Barclay Street
New York, New York 10286
Re: Insured municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230
(Michigan Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 119)
Gentlemen:
We have acted as special Michigan counsel to you as sponsors and
trustees of Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-
Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 (Michigan Insured Municipals Income Trust,
Series 119) referred to above (the "Fund"). You have asked that we,
acting in such capacity, render an opinion to you with respect to certain
matters relating to the issuance of the units of fractional undivided
interest in the Fund (the "Units") pursuant to a Registration Statement
on Form S-6 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Registration Statement").
You have requested our opinion as to the applicability to the
Michigan Insured Municipals Income Trust (the "Michigan Trust") and the
holders of Units (the "Holders"), each of which Units represents the
ownership of a specified fractional undivided interest in the assets of
the Michigan Trust, of the Michigan Income Tax Act (M.C.L.A. 206.1 et
seq.; M.S.A. 7.557 (101) et seq.) (the "Michigan Income Tax"), the City
Income Tax Act (M.C.L.A. 141.501 et seq.; M.S.A. 5.3194 (1) et seq.),
which incorporates the "Uniform City Income Tax Ordinance," the First
Class School District excise tax upon income (M.C.L.A. 380.451; M.S.A.
SS15.4451) (collectively, the "income tax laws"), the Michigan Single
Business Tax Act (M.C.L.A. 208.1 et seq.; M.S.A. 7.558(1) et seq.)
(the "Single Business Tax") and the Michigan Tax on ownership of
Intangible Personal Property (M.C.L.A. 205.131 et seq.; M.S.A.
7.556(1) et seq.) (the "Intangibles Tax"). You have also requested our
opinion regarding the tax status of proceeds payable from an insurance
policy to be obtained by either the Fund or by the issuer of the Bonds
involved, guaranteeing prompt payment of principal and interest on all
Bonds in the portfolio of the Fund.
The Michigan Trust, its formation, its proposed method of operation,
the rights of owners of Certificates representing Units, the nature of
such ownership and the portfolio of investments of the Michigan Trust are
described and set forth in the Prospectus dated August 24, 1994, filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission in Registration No. 33-54975.
In giving our opinion set forth hereunder, we have relied upon the facts
contained in such Registration Statement, including the fact that, at the
respective dates of issuance of the underlying Debt obligations, opinions
of bond counsel to the respective Michigan authorities issuing such Debt
Obligations were given with respect to the validity of the Debt
Obligations and the exemption of the same, and of the interest thereon,
from Michigan taxation.
Based on the above, it is our opinion that:
The Michigan Trust and the owners of Units will, in our opinion, be
treated for purposes of the Michigan income tax laws and the Single
Business Tax in substantially the same manner as they are for purposes of
the Federal income tax laws, as currently enacted. Accordingly, we have
relied upon the opinion of Messrs. Chapman and Cutler as to the
applicability of Federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as currently amended, to the Michigan Trust and the Holders of
Units.
Under the income tax laws of the State of Michigan, the Michigan
Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation; the income of the
Michigan Trust will be treated as the income of the Holders of Units of
the Michigan Trust and be deemed to have been received by them when
received by the Michigan Trust. Interest on the Debt Obligations in the
Michigan Trust which is exempt from tax under the Michigan income tax
laws when received by the Michigan Trust will retain its status as tax
exempt interest to the Holders of Units of the Michigan Trust.
For purposes of the Michigan income tax laws, each Holder of Units
of the Michigan Trust will be considered to have received his pro rata
share of interest on each Debt Obligation in the Michigan Trust when it
is received by the Michigan Trust, and each Holder will have a taxable
event when the Michigan Trust disposes of a Debt Obligation (whether by
sale, exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or when the Unit
Holder redeems or sells his Unit, to the extent the transaction
constitutes a taxable event for Federal income tax purposes. The tax
cost of each Unit to a Unit Holder will be established and allocated for
purposes of the Michigan income tax laws in the same manner as such cost
is established and allocated for Federal income tax purposes.
Under the Michigan Intangibles Tax, the Michigan Trust is not
taxable and the pro rata ownership of the underlying Debt obligations, as
well as the interest thereon, will be exempt to the Holders of Units to
the extent the Michigan Trust consists of obligations of the State of
Michigan or its political subdivisions or municipalities, or of
obligations of possessions of the United States.
The Michigan Single Business Tax replaced the tax on corporate and
financial institution income under the Michigan Income Tax, and the
intangible tax with respect to those intangibles of persons subject to
the Single Business Tax the income from which would be considered in
computing the Single Business Tax. Persons are subject to the Single
Business Tax only if they are engaged in "business activity," as defined
in the Act. Under the Single Business Tax, both interest received by the
Michigan Trust on the underlying Debt Obligations and any amount
distributed from the Michigan Trust to a Unit Holder, if not included in
determining taxable income for Federal income tax purposes, is also not
included in the adjusted tax base upon which the Single Business Tax is
computed, of either the Michigan Trust or the Unit Holders. If the
Michigan Trust or the Unit Holders have a taxable event for Federal
income tax purposes when the Michigan Trust disposes of a Debt Obligation
(whether by sale, exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or the
Holder redeems or sells his Unit, an amount equal to any gain realized
from such taxable event which was included in the computation of taxable
income for Federal income tax purposes (plus an amount equal to any
capital gain of an individual realized in connection with such event but
excluded in computing that individual's Federal taxable income) will be
included in the tax base against which, after allocation, apportionment
and other adjustments, the Single Business Tax is computed. The tax base
will be reduced by an amount equal to any capital loss realized from such
a taxable event, whether or not the capital loss was deducted in
computing Federal taxable income in the year the loss occurred. Holders
should consult their tax advisor as to their status under Michigan law.
Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy issued to the Trustee of
the Fund, or paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of Bonds,
which, when received by the Unit Holders, represent maturing interest on
defaulted obligations held by the Trustee, will be excludable from the
Michigan income tax laws and the Single Business Tax if, and to the same
extent as, such interest would have been so excludable if paid by the
issuer of the defaulted obligations. While treatment under the Michigan
Intangibles Tax is not premised upon the characterization of such
proceeds under the Internal Revenue Code, the Michigan Department of
Treasury should adopt the same approach as under the Michigan income tax
laws and the Single Business tax.
Chapman and Cutler of 111 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois
60603, are entitled to rely on this opinion as though it were addressed
to them.
We also advise you that, as the Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminates
the capital gain deduction for tax years beginning after December 31,
1986, the federal adjusted gross income, the computation base for the
Michigan Income Tax, of a Unit Holder will be increased accordingly to
the extent such capital gains are realized when the Michigan Trust
disposes of a Debt Obligation or when the Unit Holder redeems or sells a
Unit, to the extent such transaction constitutes a taxable event for
Federal income tax purposes.
We hereby consent to the reference to Miller, Canfield, Paddock and
Stone under the heading "Michigan Tax Status" in the Prospectus relating
to the Michigan Trust which is part of the Registration Statement in
Registration No. 33-54975 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to the
filing of this opinion as an exhibit to said registration statement.
Yours very truly,
Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone
Exhibit 4.1
Interactive Data
14 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005
August 23, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt, Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Re: Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 (A Unit Investment Trust)
Registered Under the Securities Act of 1933, File No. 33-54975
Gentlemen:
We have examined the Registration Statement for the above captioned
Fund, copy of which is attached hereto.
We hereby consent to the reference in the Prospectus and
Registration Statement for the above captioned Fund to Interactive Data
Services, Inc., as the Evaluator, and to the use of the Obligations
prepared by us which are referred to in such Prospectus and Statement.
You are authorized to file copies of this letter with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Very truly yours,
James Perry
Vice President
Exhibit 4.2
Standard & Poor's Corporation
25 Broadway
New York, New York 10004-1064
Mr. Mark Kneedy
Chapman and Cutler
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Re:Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230
Pursuant to your request for a Standard & Poor's rating on the units
of the above-captioned trust, SEC #33-54975 we have reviewed the
information presented to us and have assigned a 'AAA' rating to the units
of the trust and a 'AAA' rating to the securities contained in the trust
for as long as they remain in the trust. The ratings are direct
reflections, of the portfolio of the trust, which will be composed solely
of securities covered by bond insurance policies that insure against
default in the payment of principal and interest on the securities so
long as they remain in the trust. Since such policies have been issued
by one or more insurance companies which have been assigned a 'AAA'
claims paying ability rating by S&P, S&P has assigned a 'AAA' rating to
the units of the trust and to the securities contained in the trust for
as long as they remain in the trust.
You have permission to use the name of Standard & Poor's Corporation
and the above-assigned ratings in connection with your dissemination of
information relating to these units, provided that it is understood that
the ratings are not "market" ratings nor recommendations to buy, hold, or
sell the units of the trust or the securities contained in the trust.
Further, it should be understood the rating on the units does not take
into account the extent to which fund expenses or portfolio asset sales
for less than the fund's purchase price will reduce payment to the unit
holders of the interest and principal required to be paid on the
portfolio assets. S&P reserves the right to advise its own clients,
subscribers, and the public of the ratings. S&P relies on the sponsor
and its counsel, accountants, and other experts for the accuracy and
completeness of the information submitted in connection with the ratings.
S&P does not independently verify the truth or accuracy of any such
information.
This letter evidences our consent to the use of the name of Standard
& Poor's Corporation in connection with the rating assigned to the units
in the registration statement or prospectus relating to the units or the
trust. However, this letter should not be construed as a consent by us,
within the meaning of Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, to the use
of the name of Standard & Poor's Corporation in connection with the
ratings assigned to the securities contained in the trust. You are
hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Please be certain to send us three copies of your final prospectus
as soon as it becomes available. Should we not receive them within a
reasonable time after the closing or should they not conform to the
representations made to us, we reserve the right to withdraw the rating.
We are pleased to have had the opportunity to be of service to you.
If we can be of further help, please do not hesitate to call upon us.
Sincerely,
Vincent S. Orgo
*Consisting of:
Insured Municipals Income Trust, 76th Limited Maturity
Insured Municipals Income Trust, 94th Short Intermediate
California Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 131
Florida Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 83
Michigan Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 119
New York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 121
Hawaii Investors Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 1
Oregon Investors Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 53
Virginia Investors Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 61
Exhibit 4.3
Independent Certified Public Accountants' Consent
We have issued our report dated August 24, 1994 on the statements of
condition and related bond portfolios of Insured Municipals Income Trust
and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 230 (IM-IT Limited
Maturity, IM-IT Short Intermediate, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT,
Michigan IM-IT, New York IM-IT, Hawaii Quality, Oregon Quality and
Virginia Quality Trusts) as of August 24, 1994 contained in the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 and in the Prospectus. We consent to
the use of our report in the Registration Statement and in the Prospectus
and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption "Other Matters-
Independent Certified Public Accountants."
Grant Thornton
Chicago, Illinois
August 24, 1994
