March 29, 1996
Van Kampen American Capital
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 269
IM-IT 369
Michigan IM-IT 136
Pennsylvania IM-IT 216
California IM-IT 151
Minnesota IM-IT 58
Virginia Quality 70
Florida IM-IT 102
New Jersey IM-IT 110
In the opinion of counsel, interest to the Fund and to Unitholders, with
certain exceptions, is excludable under existing law from gross income for
Federal income taxes. In addition, the interest income of each State Trust is,
in the opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state and local
taxes, when held by residents of the state where the issuers of Bonds in such
Trust are located. Capital gains, if any, are subject to Federal tax.
The Fund. The objectives of the Fund are Federal and, in the case of a State
Trust, state tax-exempt income and conservation of capital through an
investment in a diversified portfolio of tax-exempt bonds. The Fund consists
of eight underlying separate unit investment trusts designated as Insured
Municipals Income Trust, Series 369 (the "IM-IT" ), California Insured
Municipals Income Trust, Series 151 (the "California IM-IT Trust" ),
Florida Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 102 (the "Florida IM-IT
Trust" ), Michigan Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 136 (the "
Michigan IM-IT Trust" ), Minnesota Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series
58 (the "Minnesota IM-IT Trust" ), New Jersey Insured Municipals Income
Trust, Series 110 (the "New Jersey IM-IT Trust" ), Pennsylvania Insured
Municipals Income Trust, Series 216 (the "Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust" )
and Virginia Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Series 70 (the "Virginia
Quality Trust" ). The various trusts are collectively referred to herein as
the "Trusts" . The California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT,
Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and Virginia Quality
Trusts are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "State
Trusts" , while the IM-IT, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT,
Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts are sometimes
collectively referred to herein as the "Insured Trusts" and the
Virginia Quality Trust is sometimes referred to herein as the "Quality
Trust" . Each Trust initially consists of delivery statements relating to
contracts to purchase securities and, thereafter, will consist of such
securities as may continue to be held (the "Bonds" or "
Securities" ). Such Securities are interest-bearing obligations issued by
or on behalf of municipalities and other governmental authorities, the
interest on which is, in the opinion of recognized bond counsel to the issuing
governmental authority, exempt from all Federal income taxes under the
existing law. In addition, the interest income of each State Trust is, in the
opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state and local taxes,
when held by residents of the state where the issuers of Bonds in such Trust
are located.
"AAA" Rating for the Insured Trusts Only. Insurance guaranteeing the
payments of principal and interest, when due, on the Securities in the
portfolio of each Insured Trust has been obtained from a municipal bond
insurance company either by such Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds involved,
by a prior owner of the Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such
Bonds in an Insured Trust. See "Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the
Bonds in the Insured Trusts" on page 23. Insurance obtained by an Insured
Trust applies only while Bonds are retained in such Trust while insurance
obtained on Preinsured Bonds is effective so long as such Bonds are
outstanding. The Trustee, upon the sale of a Bond insured under an insurance
policy obtained by an Insured Trust, has a right to obtain from the insurer
involved permanent insurance for such Bond upon the payment of a single
predetermined insurance premium and any expenses related thereto from the
proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Insurance relates only to the Bonds in a
Trust and not to the Units offered hereby or to the market value thereof. As a
result of such insurance, the Units of each Insured Trust have received a
rating of "AAA" by Standard & Poor's, A Division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies. Standard & Poor's has indicated that this rating is not a
recommendation to buy, hold or sell Units nor does it take into account the
extent to which expenses of each Insured Trust or sales by each Insured Trust
of Bonds for less than the purchase price paid by such Trust will reduce
payments to Unitholders of the interest and principal required to be paid on
such Bonds. See "Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the
Insured Trusts" . No representation is made as to any insurer's ability to
meet its commitments.
Public Offering Price. The Public Offering Price of the Units of each Trust
during the initial offering period includes the aggregate offering price of
the Securities in such Trust's portfolio, an applicable sales charge, cash, if
any, in the Principal Account held or owned by such Trust, and accrued
interest, if any. After the initial public offering period, the secondary
market Public Offering Price of each Trust will include the aggregate bid
price of the Securities in such Trust, an applicable sales charge, cash, if
any, in the Principal Account held or owned by such Trust, and accrued
interest, if any. If the Securities in each Trust were available for direct
purchase by investors, the purchase price of the Securities would not include
the sales charge included in the Public Offering Price of the Units. During
the initial offering period, the sales charge is reduced on a graduated scale
for sales involving at least 100 Units. If Units were available for purchase
at the close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit (except for the
IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date
of Deposit), the Public Offering Price per Unit would have been that amount
set forth in the "Summary of Essential Financial Information" for each
Trust. The minimum purchase requirement is one Unit except for certain
transactions described under "Trust Administration--Unit Distribution"
. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering" .
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS
A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return. The annual Estimated
Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns to Unitholders as of the close
of business on the day before the Date of Deposit (except for the IM-IT and
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit)
under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans were as set forth under
"Per Unit Information" for each Trust. The methods of calculating
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are set forth in the
footnotes to the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust.
Objectives of The Fund. The objectives of the Fund are income exempt from
Federal income tax and, in the case of a State Trust, Federal and state income
tax (if any) and conservation of capital through an investment in diversified
portfolios of Federal and state tax-exempt obligations. There is, of course,
no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its objectives. The Fund may be an
appropriate investment vehicle for investors who desire to participate in a
portfolio of tax-exempt fixed income securities with greater diversification
than they might be able to acquire individually. In addition, securities of
the type deposited in the Fund are often not available in small amounts. Units
of the Trust are not deposits or obligations of, or guaranteed or endorsed by,
any bank and are not federally insured or otherwise protected by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other agency
and involve investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.
Distribution Options. Purchasers of Units who desire to receive distributions
on a monthly or semi-annual basis may elect to do so at the time of settlement
during the initial public offering period. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Change of Distribution
Option" . The plan of distribution selected by such purchasers will remain
in effect until changed. Those indicating no choice will be deemed to have
chosen the monthly distribution plan. Record dates for monthly distributions
will be the tenth day of each month and record dates for semi-annual
distributions will be the tenth day of the months indicated under "Per
Unit Information" for the applicable Trust. Distributions will be made on
the twenty-fifth day of the month subsequent to the respective record dates.
Market for Units. Although not obligated to do so, the Sponsor, Van Kampen
American Capital Distributors, Inc., intends to, and certain of the other
Underwriters may, maintain a secondary market for the Units at prices based
upon the aggregate bid prices of the Securities in the respective Trusts plus
interest accrued to the date of settlement; however, during the initial
offering period such prices will be based upon the aggregate offering prices
of the Securities plus interest accrued to the date of settlement. If such a
market is not maintained and no other over-the-counter market is available, a
Unitholder will be able to dispose of his Units only through redemption at
prices based upon the bid prices of the underlying Securities plus interest
accrued to the date of settlement (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Redemption of Units" and "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Market for Units" ).
Reinvestment Option. Unitholders of any Van Kampen American Capital-sponsored
unit investment trust may utilize their redemption or termination proceeds to
purchase Units of any other Van Kampen American Capital trust in the initial
offering period accepting rollover investments subject to a reduced sales
charge to the extent stated in the related prospectus (which may be deferred
in certain cases).
Unitholders have the opportunity to have their distributions reinvested into
an open-end, management investment company as described herein. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Reinvestment Option" .
Risk Factors. An investment in the Trusts should be made with an understanding
of the risks associated therewith, including, among other factors, the
inability of the issuer or an insurer to pay the principal of or interest on a
bond when due, volatile interest rates, early call provisions, and changes to
the tax status of the Bonds. See "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of
Bonds in the Trusts--Risk Factors" .
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
AND INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST,
Multi-Series 269
Summary of Essential Financial Information
At the Close of Business on the day before the Date of Deposit: March 28, 1996
(except for the IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time
on the Date of Deposit: March 29, 1996)
Sponsor: Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc.
Evaluator: American Portfolio Evaluation Services
(A division of an affiliate of the Sponsor)
Trustee: The Bank of New York
<CAPTION>
California Florida Michigan
GENERAL INFORMATION IM-IT IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust <F1>................... $ 9,060,000 $ 2,945,000 $ 3,030,000 $ 3,100,000
Number of Units............................................................ 9,048 3,006 3,051 3,096
Fractional Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit ....................... 1/9,048 1/3,006 1/3,051 1/3,096
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit <F2>................... $ 1,001.33 $ 979.71 $ 993.12 $ 1,001.29
Public Offering Price: ....................................................
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities in Portfolio....................... $ 8,604,681 $ 2,858,722 $ 2,901,514 $ 2,944,310
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities per Unit........................... $ 951.00 $ 951.01 $ 951.00 $ 951.00
Sales Charge <F3>......................................................... $ 49.00 $ 48.99 $ 49.00 $ 49.00
Public Offering Price per Unit <F4>....................................... $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit <F4>............................................ $ 943.56 $ 943.36 $ 943.62 $ 943.29
Secondary Market Repurchase Price per Unit <F4>........................... $ 951.00 $ 951.01 $ 951.00 $ 951.00
Excess of Public Offering Price per Unit Over Redemption Price per Unit.... $ 56.44 $ 56.64 $ 56.38 $ 56.71
Excess of Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price per Unit Over Redemption
Price per Unit............................................................. $ 7.44 $ 7.65 $ 7.38 $ 7.71
Minimum Value of the Trust under which Trust Agreement may be terminated... $ 1,812,000 $ 589,000 $ 606,000 $ 620,000
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Minimum Principal Distribution...........$1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date....................April 3, 1996
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee.......Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee <F5>...$0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made as
of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock Exchange
next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of Units or receipt
by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
<FN>
<F1>Because certain of the Securities in certain Trusts may from time to time
under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will be called or mature in
accordance with their terms (including the call or sale of zero coupon bonds
at prices less than par value), there is no guarantee that the value of each
Unit at the respective Trusts' termination will be equal to the Principal
Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit stated above.
<F2>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a number
of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000 principal amount
of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand, in determining the
number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT
Intermediate and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, has elected not to follow
this format but rather to provide that number of Units which will establish as
close as possible as of the Date of Deposit a Public Offering Price per Unit
of $1,000. For IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate and IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand, each unit represents $1,000 principal
amount of underlying securities in such Trust on the Date of Deposit.
<F3>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public Offering
Price per Unit and in parenthesis as a percentage of the aggregate offering
price of the Securities, are as follows: an IM-IT or a State Trust - 4.9%
(5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust - 4.3% (4.493%); an IM-IT
Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); or an IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust -
2.0% (2.041%).
<F4>Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First Settlement Date will pay
accrued interest from such date to the date of settlement (normally three
business days after order) less distributions from the Interest Account
subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For purchases settling on the First
Settlement Date, no accrued interest will be added to the Public Offering
Price. After the initial offering period, the Sponsor's Repurchase Price per
Unit will be determined as described under the caption "Public
Offering--Market for Units."
<F5>Such fee is based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities in each
Trust on the Date of Deposit for the first year and as of the close of
business on January 1 for each year thereafter.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
AND INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST,
Multi-Series 269
Summary of Essential Financial Information
At the Close of Business on the day before the Date of Deposit: March 28, 1996
(except for the IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time
on the Date of Deposit: March 29, 1996)
Sponsor: Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc.
Evaluator: American Portfolio Evaluation Services
(A division of an affiliate of the Sponsor)
Trustee: The Bank of New York
<CAPTION>
Minnesota New Jersey Pennsylvania Virginia
GENERAL INFORMATION IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust Quality Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust <F1>................... $ 3,040,000 $ 3,020,000 $ 3,025,000 $ 3,020,000
Number of Units............................................................ 3,026 3,072 3,062 3,080
Fractional Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit........................ 1/3,026 1/3,072 1/3,062 1/3,080
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit <F2>................... $ 1,004.63 $ 983.07 $ 987.92 $ 980.52
Public Offering Price: ....................................................
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities in Portfolio....................... $ 2,877,741 $ 2,921,483 $ 2,911,976 $ 2,929,095
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities per Unit........................... $ 951.01 $ 951.00 $ 951.00 $ 951.00
Sales Charge <F3>......................................................... $ 48.99 $ 49.00 $ 49.00 $ 49.00
Public Offering Price per Unit <F4>....................................... $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit <F4>............................................. $ 943.47 $ 943.63 $ 943.59 $ 943.65
Secondary Market Repurchase Price per Unit <F4>............................ $ 951.01 $ 951.00 $ 951.00 $ 951.00
Excess of Public Offering Price per Unit Over Redemption Price per Unit.... $ 56.53 $ 56.37 $ 56.41 $ 56.35
Excess of Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price per Unit Over Redemption
Price per Unit............................................................. $ 7.54 $ 7.37 $ 7.41 $ 7.35
Minimum Value of the Trust under which Trust Agreement may be terminated... $ 608,000 $ 604,000 $ 605,000 $ 604,000
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Minimum Principal Distribution...........$1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date....................April 3, 1996
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee.......Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee <F5>...$0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
</TABLE>
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made as
of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock Exchange
next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of Units or receipt
by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
[FN]
<F1>Because certain of the Securities in certain Trusts may from time to time
under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will be called or mature in
accordance with their terms (including the call or sale of zero coupon bonds
at prices less than par value), there is no guarantee that the value of each
Unit at the respective Trusts' termination will be equal to the Principal
Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit stated above.
<F2>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a number
of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000 principal amount
of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand, in determining the
number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT
Intermediate and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, has elected not to follow
this format but rather to provide that number of Units which will establish as
close as possible as of the Date of Deposit a Public Offering Price per Unit
of $1,000. For IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate and IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand, each unit represents $1,000 principal
amount of underlying securities in such Trust on the Date of Deposit.
<F3>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price per Unit and in parenthesis as a percentage of the
aggregate offering price of the Securities, are as follows: an IM-IT or
a State Trust - 4.9% (5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust - 4.3%
(4.493%); an IM-IT Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); or an IM-IT
Short Intermediate Trust - 2.0% (2.041%).
<F4>Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First Settlement Date
will pay accrued interest from such date to the date of settlement
(normally three business days after order) less distributions from the
Interest Account subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For purchases
settling on the First Settlement Date, no accrued interest will be added
to the Public Offering Price. After the initial offering period, the
Sponsor's Repurchase Price per Unit will be determined as described
under the caption "Public Offering--Market for Units."
SETTLEMENT OF BONDS IN THE TRUSTS
The Fund. Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt
Trust, Multi-Series 269 (the "Fund" ), was created under the laws of
the State of New York pursuant to a Trust Indenture and Agreement (the "
Trust Agreement" ), dated the Date of Deposit, among Van Kampen American
Capital Distributors, Inc., as Sponsor, American Portfolio Evaluation
Services, a division of Van Kampen American Capital Investment Advisory Corp.,
as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
The Fund consists of eight separate portfolios of delivery statements relating
to contracts to purchase interest-bearing obligations issued by or on behalf
of states and territories of the United States, and political subdivisions and
authorities thereof, the interest on which is, in the opinion of recognized
bond counsel to the issuing authorities, excludable from gross income for
Federal income tax under existing law. All issuers of Securities in a State
Trust are located in the State for which such Trust is named or in United
States territories or possessions and their public authorities; consequently,
in the opinion of recognized bond counsel to such State issuers, the related
interest earned on such Securities is exempt to the extent indicated from
state and local taxes of such State. With the exception of the New York and
Pennsylvania Trusts, Units of such Trusts may be purchased only by residents
of the State for which such Trust is named. Units of a New York Trust may be
purchased by residents of New York, Connecticut, Florida and Massachusetts.
Units of a Pennsylvania Trust may be purchased by residents of Pennsylvania,
Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, New York, Ohio and West Virginia. Offerees in
the States of Illinois, Indiana and Washington may purchase Units of the IM-IT
Trust only. Offerees in the State of Virginia may purchase Units of the IM-IT
and Virginia Trusts only. On the Date of Deposit, the Sponsor deposited with
the Trustee the aggregate principal amount of Securities in each Trust as
indicated under "General Information--Principal Amount (Par Value) of
Securities in Trust" in the "Summary of Essential Financial
Information" . Such Securities consist of delivery statements relating to
contracts for the purchase of certain interest-bearing obligations and cash,
cash equivalents and/or irrevocable letters of credit issued by a financial
institution in the amount required for such purchases. Thereafter, the
Trustee, in exchange for the Securities so deposited, delivered to the Sponsor
the certificates evidencing the ownership of the number of Units in each Trust
as indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information."
Unless otherwise terminated as provided herein, the Trust Agreement for any
IM-IT or State Trust will terminate at the end of the calendar year prior to
the fiftieth anniversary of its execution, and the Trust Agreement for any
IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, IM-IT Intermediate Trust or IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust will terminate at the end of the calendar year prior to the
twentieth anniversary of its execution.
The portfolio of any IM-IT or State Trust consists of Bonds maturing
approximately 15 to 40 years from the Date of Deposit. The approximate range
of maturities from the Date of Deposit for Bonds in any IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust, IM-IT Intermediate Trust and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust is 12 to 15
years, 5 to 15 years and 3 to 7 years, respectively. The dollar-weighted
average maturity of the Bonds in any IM-IT Intermediate Trust and IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust is less than or equal to 10 years and 5 years, respectively.
The portfolios of the Trusts may consist of bonds that were acquired at a
market discount from par value at maturity. The coupon interest rates on the
discount bonds at the time they were purchased and deposited in such Trust
were lower than the current market interest rates for newly issued bonds of
comparable rating and type. If such interest rates for newly issued comparable
bonds increase, the market discount of previously issued bonds will become
greater, and if such interest rates for newly issued comparable bonds decline,
the market discount of previously issued bonds will be reduced, other things
being equal. Investors should also note that the value of bonds purchased at a
market discount will increase in value faster than bonds purchased at a market
premium if interest rates decrease. Conversely, if interest rates increase,
the value of bonds purchased at a market discount will decrease faster than
bonds purchased at a market premium. In addition, if interest rates rise, the
prepayment risk of higher yielding, premium bonds and the prepayment benefit
for lower yielding, discount bonds will be reduced. A bond purchased at a
market discount and held to maturity will have a larger portion of its total
return in the form of taxable income and capital gain and less in the form of
tax-exempt interest income than a comparable bond newly issued at current
market rates. See "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status." Market discount
attributable to interest changes does not indicate a lack of market confidence
in the issue. Neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee shall be liable in any way
for any default, failure or defect in any of the Bonds.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be "zero coupon"
bonds. See footnote (6) in "Notes to Portfolios" . Zero coupon bonds
are purchased at a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to
receive a final payment at the maturity of the bond and does not receive any
periodic interest payments. The effect of owning deep discount bonds which do
not make current interest payments (such as the zero coupon bonds) is that a
fixed yield is earned not only on the original investment but also, in effect,
on all discount earned during the life of such obligation. This implicit
reinvestment of earnings at the same rate eliminates the risk of being unable
to reinvest the income on such obligation at a rate as high as the implicit
yield on the discount obligation, but at the same time eliminates the holder's
ability to reinvest at higher rates in the future. For this reason, zero
coupon bonds are subject to substantially greater price fluctuations during
periods of changing market interest rates than are securities of comparable
quality which pay interest.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may have been purchased on a
"when, as and if issued" or "delayed delivery" basis. See
footnote (5) in "Notes to Portfolios" . The delivery of any such
Securities may be delayed or may not occur. Interest on these Securities
begins accruing to the benefit of Unitholders on their respective dates of
delivery. To the extent any Securities are actually delivered to the Fund
after their respective expected dates of delivery, Unitholders who purchase
their Units prior to the date such Securities are actually delivered to the
Trustee would be required to adjust their tax basis in their Units for a
portion of the interest accruing on such Securities during the interval
between their purchase of Units and the actual delivery of such Securities. As
a result of any such adjustment, the Estimated Current Returns during the
first year would be slightly lower than those stated herein which would be the
returns after the first year, assuming the portfolio of a Trust and estimated
annual expenses other than that of the Trustee (which may be reduced in the
first year only) do not vary from that set forth under "Per Unit
Information" for the applicable Trust. Holders of the Units will be "
at risk" with respect to all Securities in the portfolios including "
when, as and if issued" and "delayed delivery" Securities (i.e.,
may derive either gain or loss from fluctuations in the evaluation of such
Securities) from the date they commit for Units. For a discussion of the
Sponsor's obligations in the event of the failure of any contract for the
purchase of any of the Securities and limited right to substitute other
tax-exempt bonds to replace any failed contract, see "Replacement
Bonds" below.
Each Unit initially offered represents the fractional undivided interest in
the principal and net income of a Trust indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information" . To the extent that any Units are
redeemed by the Trustee, the fractional undivided interest in a Trust
represented by each unredeemed Unit will increase, although the actual
interest in such Trust represented by such fraction will remain unchanged.
Units will remain outstanding until redeemed upon tender to the Trustee by
Unitholders, which may include the Sponsor or the Underwriters, or until the
termination of the Trust Agreement.
Objectives and Securities Selection. The objectives of the Fund are income
exempt from Federal income taxation and, in the case of a State Trust, Federal
and state income taxation and conservation of capital through an investment in
diversified portfolios of Federal and state tax-exempt obligations. There is,
of course, no guarantee that the Trusts will achieve their respective
objectives. The Fund may be an appropriate investment vehicle for investors
who desire to participate in a portfolio of tax-exempt fixed income securities
with greater diversification than they might be able to acquire individually.
In addition, securities of the type deposited in the Fund are often not
available in small amounts.
Insurance guaranteeing the timely payment, when due, of all principal and
interest on the Bonds in each Insured Trust has been obtained by such Trust
from either AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity" ), Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty" or "FGIC" ) or
a combination thereof (collectively, the "Portfolio Insurers" ), or by
the issuer of such Bonds, by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor
prior to the deposit of such Bonds in such Trust from (1) AMBAC Indemnity or
one of its subsidiaries, American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation ("
AMBAC" ) or MGIC Indemnity Corporation ("MGIC Indemnity" ), (2)
Financial Guaranty, (3) MBIA Insurance Corporation ("MBIA" ), (4) Bond
Investors Guaranty Insurance Company ("BIG" ), (5) National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. ("National Union" ), (6) Capital
Guaranty Insurance Company ("Capital Guaranty" ), (7) Capital Markets
Assurance Corporation ("CapMAC" ) and/or (8) Financial Security
Assurance Inc. ("Financial Security" or "FSA" ) (collectively,
the "Preinsured Bond Insurers" ) (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" ). Insurance
obtained by an Insured Trust is effective only while the Bonds thus insured
are held in such Trust. The Trustee has the right to acquire permanent
insurance from a Portfolio Insurer with respect to each Bond insured by the
respective Portfolio Insurer under a Trust portfolio insurance policy.
Insurance relating to Bonds insured by the issuer, by a prior owner of such
Bonds or by the Sponsor is effective so long as such Bonds are outstanding.
Bonds insured under a policy of insurance obtained by the issuer, by a prior
owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor from one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers
(the "Preinsured Bonds" ) are not additionally insured by an Insured
Trust. No representation is made as to any insurer's ability to meet its
commitments.
Neither the Public Offering Price nor any evaluation of Units for purposes of
repurchases or redemptions reflects any element of value for the insurance
obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, unless Bonds are in default in payment
of principal or interest or in significant risk of such default. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" . On the other
hand, the value, if any, of Preinsured Bond insurance is reflected and
included in the market value of such Bonds.
In order for bonds to be eligible for insurance, they must have credit
characteristics which would qualify them for at least the Standard & Poor's
rating of "BBB-" or at least the Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
rating of "Baa" , which in brief represent the lowest ratings for
securities of investment grade (see "Other Matters--Description of
Securities Ratings" ). Insurance is not a substitute for the basic credit
of an issuer, but supplements the existing credit and provides additional
security therefor. If an issue is accepted for insurance, a non-cancellable
policy for the prompt payment of interest and principal on the bonds, when
due, is issued by the insurer. Any premium or premiums relating to Preinsured
Bond insurance is paid by the issuer, by a prior owner of such Bonds or by the
Sponsor and a monthly premium is paid by an Insured Trust for the portfolio
insurance, if any, obtained by such Trust. The Trustee has the right to obtain
permanent insurance from a Portfolio Insurer in connection with the sale of a
Bond insured under the insurance policy obtained from the respective Portfolio
Insurer by an Insured Trust upon the payment of a single predetermined
insurance premium from the proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any
Bond in an Insured Trust is eligible to be sold on an insured basis. All Bonds
insured by the Portfolio Insurers and the Preinsured Bond Insurers receive a
"AAA" rating by Standard & Poor's. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
In selecting Securities for the Trusts the following facts, among others, were
considered by the Sponsor: (a) either the Standard & Poor's rating of the
Securities was in no case less than "BBB-" in the case of the Insured
Trusts and "A-" in the case of the Quality Trusts, or the Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. rating of the Securities was in no case less than "
Baa" in the case of the Insured Trusts and "A" in the case of the
Quality Trusts, including provisional or conditional ratings, respectively,
or, if not rated, the Securities had, in the opinion of the Sponsor, credit
characteristics sufficiently similar to the credit characteristics of
interest-bearing tax-exempt obligations that were so rated as to be acceptable
for acquisition by the Fund (see "Other Matters--Description of Securities
Ratings" ), (b) the prices of the Securities relative to other bonds of
comparable quality and maturity, (c) the diversification of Securities as to
purpose of issue and location of issuer and (d) with respect to the Insured
Trusts, the availability and cost of insurance for the prompt payment of
principal and interest, when due, on the Securities. Subsequent to the Date of
Deposit, a Security may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below
the minimum required as of the Date of Deposit. Neither event requires
elimination of such Security from the portfolio of a Trust but may be
considered in the Sponsor's determination as to whether or not to direct the
Trustee to dispose of the Security (see "Trust Administration--Fund
Administration and Expenses--Portfolio Administration" ).
To the best knowledge of the Sponsor, there is no litigation pending as of the
Date of Deposit in respect of any Securities which might reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect upon the Fund or any of the Trusts.
At any time after the Date of Deposit, litigation may be initiated on a
variety of grounds with respect to Securities in the Fund. Such litigation,
as, for example, suits challenging the issuance of pollution control revenue
bonds under environmental protection statutes, may affect the validity of such
Securities or the tax-free nature of the interest thereon. While the outcome
of litigation of such nature can never be entirely predicted, the Fund has
received or will receive opinions of bond counsel to the issuing authorities
of each Security on the date of issuance to the effect that such Securities
have been validly issued and that the interest thereon is exempt from Federal
income tax. In addition, other factors may arise from time to time which
potentially may impair the ability of issuers to meet obligations undertaken
with respect to the Securities.
Risk Factors. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be general
obligations of a governmental entity that are backed by the taxing power of
such entity. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with
an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which
such an investment may entail. All other Bonds in the Trusts are revenue bonds
payable from the income of a specific project or authority and are not
supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. General obligation bonds are
secured by the issuer's pledge of its faith, credit and taxing power for the
payment of principal and interest. Revenue bonds, on the other hand, are
payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of
facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise tax or
other specific revenue source. There are, of course, variations in the
security of the different Bonds in the Fund, both within a particular
classification and between classifications, depending on numerous factors. See
"General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which derive
their payments from mortgage loans. Certain of such housing bonds may be FHA
insured or may be single family mortgage revenue bonds issued for the purpose
of acquiring from originating financial institutions notes secured by
mortgages on residences located within the issuer's boundaries and owned by
persons of low or moderate income. In view of this an investment in such a
Trust should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such
issuers and the risks which such an investment may entail. Mortgage loans are
generally partially or completely prepaid prior to their final maturities as a
result of events such as sale of the mortgaged premises, default, condemnation
or casualty loss. Because these bonds are subject to extraordinary mandatory
redemption in whole or in part from such prepayments of mortgage loans, a
substantial portion of such bonds will probably be redeemed prior to their
scheduled maturities or even prior to their ordinary call dates. Extraordinary
mandatory redemption without premium could also result from the failure of the
originating financial institutions to make mortgage loans in sufficient
amounts within a specified time period. Additionally, unusually high rates of
default on the underlying mortgage loans may reduce revenues available for the
payment of principal of or interest on such mortgage revenue bonds. These
bonds were issued under Section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code, which
Section contains certain requirements relating to the use of the proceeds of
such bonds in order for the interest on such bonds to retain its tax-exempt
status. In each case the issuer of the bonds has covenanted to comply with
applicable requirements and bond counsel to such issuer has issued an opinion
that the interest on the bonds is exempt from Federal income tax under
existing laws and regulations. Certain issuers of housing bonds have
considered various ways to redeem bonds they have issued prior to the stated
first redemption dates for such bonds. In connection with the housing bonds
held by the Fund, the Sponsor at the Date of Deposit is not aware that any of
the respective issuers of such Bonds are actively considering the redemption
of such Bonds prior to their respective stated initial call dates. See "
General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be health care revenue
bonds. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Ratings of bonds issued for health care facilities
are often based on feasibility studies that contain projections of occupancy
levels, revenues and expenses. A facility's gross receipts and net income
available for debt service may be affected by future events and conditions
including, among other things, demand for services and the ability of the
facility to provide the services required, physicians' confidence in the
facility, management capabilities, competition with other health care
facilities, efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates,
legislation establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, the cost and
possible unavailability of malpractice insurance, the funding of Medicare,
Medicaid and other similar third party payor programs, government regulation
and the termination or restriction of governmental financial assistance,
including that associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third
party payor programs. Pursuant to recent Federal legislation, Medicare
reimbursements are currently calculated on a prospective basis utilizing a
single nationwide schedule of rates. Prior to such legislation Medicare
reimbursements were based on the actual costs incurred by the health facility.
The current legislation may adversely affect reimbursements to hospitals and
other facilities for services provided under the Medicare program. Such
adverse changes also may adversely affect the ratings of Securities held in
the portfolios of the Fund; however, because of the insurance obtained by each
of the Insured Trusts, the "AAA" rating of the Units of each of the
Insured Trusts would not be affected. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of public
utility issuers, including those selling wholesale and retail electric power
and gas. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. General problems of such issuers would include the
difficulty in financing large construction programs in an inflationary period,
the limitations on operations and increased costs and delays attributable to
environmental considerations, the difficulty of the capital market in
absorbing utility debt, the difficulty in obtaining fuel at reasonable prices
and the effect of energy conservation. All of such issuers have been
experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees. In addition,
Federal, state and municipal governmental authorities may from time to time
review existing, and impose additional, regulations governing the licensing,
construction and operation of nuclear power plants, which may adversely affect
the ability of the issuers of certain of the Bonds in the portfolio to make
payments of principal and/or interest on such Bonds. See "General" for
each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of issuers
whose revenues are derived from the sale of water and/or sewerage services. In
view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Such Bonds are generally payable from user fees. The
problems of such issuers include the ability to obtain timely and adequate
rate increases, population decline resulting in decreased user fees, the
difficulty of financing large construction programs, the limitations on
operations and increased costs and delays attributable to environmental
considerations, the increasing difficulty of obtaining or discovering new
supplies of fresh water, the effect of conservation programs and the impact of
"no-growth" zoning ordinances. All of such issuers have been
experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees. See "
General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be industrial revenue bonds
("IRBs" ). In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. IRBs have generally been issued under
bond resolutions pursuant to which the revenues and receipts payable under the
arrangements with the operator of a particular project have been assigned and
pledged to purchasers. In some cases, a mortgage on the underlying project may
have been granted as security for the IRBs. Regardless of the structure,
payment of IRBs is solely dependent upon the creditworthiness of the corporate
operator of the project or corporate guarantor. Corporate operators or
guarantors may be affected by many factors which may have an adverse impact on
the credit quality of the particular company or industry. These include
cyclicality of revenues and earnings, regulatory and environmental
restrictions, litigation resulting from accidents or environmentally-caused
illnesses, extensive competition and financial deterioration resulting from a
corporate restructuring pursuant to a leveraged buy-out, takeover or
otherwise. Such a restructuring may result in the operator of a project
becoming highly leveraged which may impact on such operator's creditworthiness
which in turn would have an adverse impact on the rating and/or market value
of such Bonds. Further, the possibility of such a restructuring may have an
adverse impact on the market for and consequently the value of such Bonds,
even though no actual takeover or other action is ever contemplated or
effected. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations that are
secured by lease payments of a governmental entity (hereinafter called "
lease obligations" ). Lease obligations are often in the form of
certificates of participation. In view of this an investment in such a Trust
should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers
and the risks which such an investment may entail. Although the lease
obligations do not constitute general obligations of the municipality for
which the municipality's taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is
ordinarily backed by the municipality's covenant to appropriate for and make
the payments due under the lease obligation. However, certain lease
obligations contain "non-appropriation" clauses which provide that the
municipality has no obligation to make lease payments in future years unless
money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis. A governmental
entity that enters into such a lease agreement cannot obligate future
governments to appropriate for and make lease payments but covenants to take
such action as is necessary to include any lease payments due in its budgets
and to make the appropriations therefor. A governmental entity's failure to
appropriate for and to make payments under its lease obligation could result
in insufficient funds available for payment of the obligations secured
thereby. Although "non-appropriation" lease obligations are secured by
the leased property, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure
might prove difficult. See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of issuers
which are, or which govern the operation of, schools, colleges and
universities and whose revenues are derived mainly from ad valorem taxes or
for higher education systems, from tuition, dormitory revenues, grants and
endowments. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with
an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which
such an investment may entail. General problems relating to school bonds
include litigation contesting the State constitutionality of financing public
education in part from ad valorem taxes, thereby creating a disparity in
educational funds available to schools in wealthy areas and schools in poor
areas. Litigation or legislation on this issue may affect the sources of funds
available for the payment of school bonds in the Trusts. General problems
relating to college and university obligations include the prospect of a
declining percentage of the population consisting of "college" age
individuals, possible inability to raise tuitions and fees sufficiently to
cover increased operating costs, the uncertainty of continued receipt of
Federal grants and state funding, and government legislation or regulations
which may adversely affect the revenues or costs of such issuers. All of such
issuers have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees.
See "General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which are
payable from and secured by revenues derived from the ownership and operation
of facilities such as airports, bridges, turnpikes, port authorities,
convention centers and arenas. In view of this an investment in such a Trust
should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers
and the risks which such an investment may entail. The major portion of an
airport's gross operating income is generally derived from fees received from
signatory airlines pursuant to use agreements which consist of annual payments
for leases, occupancy of certain terminal space and service fees. Airport
operating income may therefore be affected by the ability of the airlines to
meet their obligations under the use agreements. The air transport industry is
experiencing significant variations in earnings and traffic, due to increased
competition, excess capacity, increased costs, deregulation, traffic
constraints and other factors, and several airlines are experiencing severe
financial difficulties. The Sponsor cannot predict what effect these industry
conditions may have on airport revenues which are dependent for payment on the
financial condition of the airlines and their usage of the particular airport
facility. Similarly, payment on Bonds related to other facilities is dependent
on revenues from the projects, such as user fees from ports, tolls on
turnpikes and bridges and rents from buildings. Therefore, payment may be
adversely affected by reduction in revenues due to such factors as increased
cost of maintenance, decreased use of a facility, lower cost of alternative
modes of transportation, scarcity of fuel and reduction or loss of rents. See
"General" for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which are
payable from and secured by revenues derived from the operation of resource
recovery facilities. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be
made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the
risks which such an investment may entail. Resource recovery facilities are
designed to process solid waste, generate steam and convert steam to
electricity. Resource recovery bonds may be subject to extraordinary optional
redemption at par upon the occurrence of certain circumstances, including but
not limited to: destruction or condemnation of a project; contracts relating
to a project becoming void, unenforceable or impossible to perform; changes in
the economic availability of raw materials, operating supplies or facilities
necessary for the operation of a project or technological or other unavoidable
changes adversely affecting the operation of a project; administrative or
judicial actions which render contracts relating to the projects void,
unenforceable or impossible to perform; or impose unreasonable burdens or
excessive liabilities. The Sponsor cannot predict the causes or likelihood of
the redemption of resource recovery bonds in such a Trust prior to the stated
maturity of the Bonds. See "General" for each Trust.
Replacement Bonds. Because certain of the Securities in the Fund may from time
to time under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will mature in
accordance with their terms and because the proceeds from such events will be
distributed to Unitholders and will not be reinvested, no assurance can be
given that any Trust will retain for any length of time its present size and
composition. Neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee shall be liable in any way
for any default, failure or defect in any Security. In the event of a failure
to deliver any Security that has been purchased for the Fund under a contract,
including those Securities purchased on a "when, as and if issued"
basis ("Failed Bonds" ), the Sponsor is authorized under the Trust
Agreement to direct the Trustee to acquire other bonds ("Replacement
Bonds" ) to make up the original corpus of the Fund.
The Replacement Bonds must be purchased within 20 days after delivery of the
notice of the failed contract and the purchase price (exclusive of accrued
interest) may not exceed the amount of funds reserved for the purchase of the
Failed Bonds. The Replacement Bonds (i) must be tax-exempt bonds issued by
states or territories of the United States or political subdivisions thereof
and, in the case of replacement of bonds in a State Trust, shall have the
benefit of an exemption from state taxation of interest to an extent equal to
or greater than that of the bonds they replace, (ii) must have a fixed
maturity date of at least 10 years in the case of an IM-IT or a State Trust
or, in the case of an IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate or IM-IT
Short Intermediate Trust, must have a fixed maturity date within the range set
forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the
Trusts--The Fund" , (iii) must be purchased at a price that results in a
yield to maturity and in a current return, in each case as of the Date of
Deposit, at least equal to that of the Failed Bonds, (iv) shall not be "
when, as and if issued" bonds, (v) must be rated "BBB-" or better
in the case of the Insured Trusts and "A-" or better in the case of
the Quality Trusts by Standard & Poor's or "Baa" or better in the case
of the Insured Trusts and "A" or better in the case of the Quality
Trusts by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and (vi) with respect to each
Insured Trust, must be insured by one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers or be
eligible for (and when acquired be insured under) the insurance obtained by
such Insured Trust. Whenever a Replacement Bond has been acquired for the
Fund, the Trustee shall, within five days thereafter, notify all Unitholders
of the affected Trust of the acquisition of the Replacement Bond and shall, on
the next monthly distribution date which is more than 30 days thereafter, make
a pro rata distribution of the amount, if any, by which the cost to the
affected Trust of the Failed Bond exceeded the cost of the Replacement Bond
plus accrued interest. Once the original corpus of a Trust is acquired, the
Trustee will have no power to vary the investment of the Trust; i.e., the
Trust will have no managerial power to take advantage of market variation to
improve a Unitholder's investment.
If the right of limited substitution described in the preceding paragraph
shall not be utilized to acquire Replacement Bonds in the event of a failed
contract, the Sponsor will refund the sales charge attributable to such Failed
Bonds to all Unitholders of the affected Trust and distribute the principal
and accrued interest (at the coupon rate of such Failed Bonds to the date the
Failed Bonds are removed from the Fund) attributable to such Failed Bonds not
more than 30 days after such removal or such earlier time as the Trustee in
its sole discretion deems to be in the interest of the Unitholders. All such
interest paid to a Unitholder which accrued after the expected date of
settlement for purchase of his Units will be paid by the Sponsor and
accordingly will not be treated as tax-exempt income. In the event a
Replacement Bond should not be acquired by the Fund, the Estimated Net Annual
Interest Income per Unit for the affected Trust would be reduced and the
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return thereon might be
lowered. In addition, Unitholders should be aware that they may not be able at
the time of receipt of such principal to reinvest such proceeds in other
securities at a yield equal to or in excess of the yield which such proceeds
were earning to Unitholders in the affected Trust.
Bond Redemptions. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be subject
to redemption prior to their stated maturity date pursuant to sinking fund
provisions, call provisions or extraordinary optional or mandatory redemption
provisions or otherwise. A sinking fund is a reserve fund accumulated over a
period of time for retirement of debt. A callable debt obligation is one which
is subject to redemption or refunding prior to maturity at the option of the
issuer. A refunding is a method by which a debt obligation is redeemed, at or
before maturity, by the proceeds of a new debt obligation. In general, call
provisions are more likely to be exercised when the offering side valuation is
at a premium over par than when it is at a discount from par. The exercise of
redemption or call provisions will (except to the extent the proceeds of the
called Bonds are used to pay for Unit redemptions) result in the distribution
of principal and may result in a reduction in the amount of subsequent
interest distributions; it may also affect the current return on Units of the
Trust involved. Each Trust portfolio contains a listing of the sinking fund
and call provisions, if any, with respect to each of the debt obligations.
Extraordinary optional redemptions and mandatory redemptions result from the
happening of certain events. Generally, events that may permit the
extraordinary optional redemption of Bonds or may require the mandatory
redemption of Bonds include, among others: a final determination that the
interest on the Bonds is taxable; the substantial damage or destruction by
fire or other casualty of the project for which the proceeds of the Bonds were
used; an exercise by a local, state or Federal governmental unit of its power
of eminent domain to take all or substantially all of the project for which
the proceeds of the Bonds were used; changes in the economic availability of
raw materials, operating supplies or facilities or technological or other
changes which render the operation of the project for which the proceeds of
the Bonds were used uneconomic; changes in law or an administrative or
judicial decree which renders the performance of the agreement under which the
proceeds of the Bonds were made available to finance the project impossible or
which creates unreasonable burdens or which imposes excessive liabilities,
such as taxes, not imposed on the date the Bonds are issued on the issuer of
the Bonds or the user of the proceeds of the Bonds; an administrative or
judicial decree which requires the cessation of a substantial part of the
operations of the project financed with the proceeds of the Bonds; an
overestimate of the costs of the project to be financed with the proceeds of
the Bonds resulting in excess proceeds of the Bonds which may be applied to
redeem Bonds; or an underestimate of a source of funds securing the Bonds
resulting in excess funds which may be applied to redeem Bonds. The issuer of
certain Bonds in a Trust may have sold or reserved the right to sell, upon the
satisfaction of certain conditions, to third parties all or any portion of its
rights to call Bonds in accordance with the stated redemption provisions of
such Bonds. In such a case the issuer no longer has the right to call the
Bonds for redemption unless it reacquires the rights from such third party. A
third party pursuant to these rights may exercise the redemption provisions
with respect to a Bond at a time when the issuer of the Bond might not have
called a Bond for redemption had it not sold such rights. The Sponsor is
unable to predict all of the circumstances which may result in such redemption
of an issue of Bonds. See "Portfolio" for each Trust and footnote (3)
in the "Notes to Portfolios" . See also the discussion of single family
mortgage and multi-family revenue bonds above for more information on the call
provisions of such bonds.
Distributions. Distributions of interest received by the Fund, pro rated on an
annual basis, will be made on a monthly basis, unless the Unitholder elects to
receive them semi-annually. The first such distribution will be in the amount
indicated under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust and
will be made on the twenty-fifth day of the month indicated under "Initial
Distribution" therein to Unitholders of record on the tenth day of such
month. The first distribution of funds from the Principal Account, if any,
will be made on the first semi-annual distribution date to Unitholders of
record on the first semi-annual record date, and thereafter such distributions
will be made on a semi-annual basis, except under certain special
circumstances (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Distributions of Interest and Principal" ).
Change of Distribution Option. The plan of distribution selected by a
Unitholder will remain in effect until changed. Unitholders purchasing Units
in the secondary market will initially receive distributions in accordance
with the election of the prior owner. Unitholders may change the plan of
distribution in which they are participating. For convenience of Unitholders,
the Trustee will furnish a card for this purpose; cards may also be obtained
upon request from the Trustee. Unitholders desiring to change their plan of
distribution may so indicate on the card and return it together with their
certificate and such other documentation that the Trustee may then require, to
the Trustee. Certificates should only be sent by registered or certified mail
to minimize the possibility of their being lost or stolen. If the card and
certificate are properly presented to the Trustee, the change will become
effective as of the opening of business on the first day after the next
succeeding semi-annual record date and will be effective, unless further
changed, for all subsequent distributions.
Certificates. The Trustee is authorized to treat as the record owner of Units
that person who is registered as such owner on the books of the Trustee.
Ownership of Units of each Trust is evidenced by separate registered
certificates executed by the Trustee and the Sponsor unless a Unitholder makes
a request to the Trustee that Units be held in book-entry form. Certificates
are transferable by presentation and surrender to the Trustee properly
endorsed or accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer. A
Unitholder must sign exactly as his name appears on the face of the
certificate (or on such request) with the signature guaranteed by a
participant in the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program ("
STAMP" ) or such other signature guaranty program in addition to, or in
substitution for, STAMP, as may be accepted by the Trustee. In certain
instances the Trustee may require additional documents such as, but not
limited to, trust instruments, certificates of death, appointments as executor
or administrator or certificates of corporate authority. Certificates will be
issued in denominations of one Unit or any multiple thereof. Certificates for
Units will bear appropriate notations on their face indicating which plan of
distribution has been selected in respect thereof. If a change in the plan of
distribution is made, the existing certificate must be surrendered to the
Trustee and a new certificate will be issued, at no charge to the Unitholder,
to reflect the currently effective plan of distribution.
Although no such charge is now made or contemplated, the Trustee may require a
Unitholder to pay a reasonable fee for each certificate re-issued (other than
as a result of a change in plan of distribution) or transferred and to pay any
governmental charge that may be imposed in connection with each such transfer
or interchange. Destroyed, stolen, mutilated or lost certificates will be
replaced upon delivery to the Trustee of satisfactory indemnity, evidence of
ownership and payment of expenses incurred. Mutilated certificates must be
surrendered to the Trustee for replacement.
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURNS AND ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURNS
As of the close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit (except for
the IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the
Date of Deposit) the Estimated Current Returns and the Estimated Long-Term
Returns, under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans, were as set
forth in the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust. Estimated Current
Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net annual interest income per
Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated net annual interest income
per Unit will vary with changes in fees and expenses of the Trustee and the
Evaluator and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, exchange or
sale of Securities while the Public Offering Price will vary with changes in
the offering price of the underlying Securities; therefore, there is no
assurance that the present Estimated Current Return will be realized in the
future. Estimated Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which (1)
takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the relative
weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account the
amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated
retirements of all of the Securities in a Trust and (2) takes into account the
expenses and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market
values and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of a Trust
will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Return
will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Return and Estimated
Long-Term Return are expected to differ because the calculation of Estimated
Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of principal returned
while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes only net annual
interest income and Public Offering Price.
In order to acquire certain of the Securities contracted for by the Sponsor
for deposit in the Fund, it may be necessary for the Sponsor or Trustee to pay
on the settlement dates for delivery of such Securities amounts covering
accrued interest on such Securities which exceed the amounts which will be
made available through cash furnished by the Sponsor on the Date of Deposit,
which amount of cash may exceed the interest which would accrue to the First
Settlement Date. The Trustee has agreed to pay for any amounts necessary to
cover any such excess and will be reimbursed therefor, when funds become
available from interest payments on the particular Securities with respect to
which such payments may have been made. Also, since interest on any "when,
as and if issued" Securities does not begin accruing as tax-exempt
interest income to the benefit of Unitholders until their respective dates of
delivery, the Trustee may, in order to maintain (or in some cases approach)
for the Unitholders the same estimated net annual interest incomes during the
first year of the Trusts' operations as is indicated under "Per Unit
Information" for the applicable Trust, reduce its fee (and to the extent
necessary pay Trust expenses) in an amount equal to that indicated under "
Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust.
INTEREST EARNING SCHEDULE
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Interest Income. The estimated net annual
interest income is based on 360 days. To account for the estimated net annual
interest income per Unit in a Trust, it is necessary to use the following
information.
The beginning interest date for each Trust is April 3, 1996. The first monthly
record date for each Trust (May 10, 1996) is 37 days from such date. The daily
rates of estimated net annual interest income per Unit accrued on a monthly
basis are $.14723, $.14748, $.14483, $.14677, $.14222, $.14615, $.14616 and
$.14785 for the IM-IT, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT,
Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and Virginia Quality
Trusts, respectively. This amounts to $5.45, $5.46, $5.36, $5.43, $5.26, $5.41
and $5.41 for the IM-IT, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT,
Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and Virginia Quality
Trusts, respectively.
Utilizing the preceding information assuming the monthly payment option, the
following procedure illustrates the calculation of first year estimated net
annual interest income per Unit for the California IM-IT Trust:
The California IM-IT Trust accrues
$5.46 to the first record date plus
$44.30 which is 10 normal distributions at $4.43, and finally adding
$3.34 which has accrued from March 10, 1997 until April 3, 1997 which
completes the 360 day cycle (23 days times the daily factor)
Total $53.10 interest earned /$1,000.00 (Date of Deposit Public Offering
Price) = 5.31% Estimated Current Return as of the Date of Deposit.
ACCRUED INTEREST
Accrued Interest. Accrued interest is an accumulation of unpaid interest on
securities which generally is paid semi-annually, although the Trust accrues
such interest daily. Because of this, the Trust always has an amount of
interest earned but not yet collected by the Trustee. For this reason, with
respect to sales settling subsequent to the First Settlement Date, the Public
Offering Price of Units will have added to it the proportionate share of
accrued interest to the date of settlement. Unitholders will receive on the
next distribution date of the Trust the amount, if any, of accrued interest
paid on their Units.
In an effort to reduce the amount of accrued interest which would otherwise
have to be paid by Unitholders, the Trustee will advance the amount of accrued
interest to the Sponsor as the Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement
Date. Consequently, the amount of accrued interest to be added to the Public
Offering Price of Units will include only accrued interest from the First
Settlement Date to the date of settlement, less any distributions from the
Interest Account subsequent to the First Settlement Date. See "Public
Offering--Distributions of Interest and Principal."
Because of the varying interest payment dates of the Securities, accrued
interest at any point in time will be greater than the amount of interest
actually received by a Trust and distributed to Unitholders. If a Unitholder
sells or redeems all or a portion of his Units, he will be entitled to receive
his proportionate share of the accrued interest from the purchaser of his
Units. Since the Trustee has the use of the funds held in the Interest Account
for distributions to Unitholders and since such Account is
non-interest-bearing to Unitholders, the Trustee benefits thereby.
PUBLIC OFFERING
General. Units are offered at the Public Offering Price. During the initial
offering period the Public Offering Price is based on the aggregate offering
price of the Securities in such Trust's portfolio, a sales charge of 4.9% of
the Public Offering Price (5.152% of the aggregate offering price of the
Securities) for an IM-IT or a State Trust, 4.3% of the Public Offering Price
(4.493% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities) for an IM-IT
Limited Maturity Trust, 3.9% of the Public Offering Price (4.058% of the
aggregate offering price of the Securities) for an IM-IT Intermediate Trust
and 2.0% of the Public Offering Price (2.041% of the aggregate offering price
of the Securities) for an IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust, cash, if any, in the
Principal Account held or owned by such Trust, and accrued interest, if any.
After the initial public offering period, the secondary market public offering
price is based on the bid prices of the Securities in each Trust, an
applicable sales charge as determined in accordance with the table set forth
below, which is based upon the dollar weighted average maturity of each Trust,
cash, if any, in the Principal Account held or owned by such Trust, and
accrued interest, if any. For purposes of computation, Bonds will be deemed to
mature on their expressed maturity dates unless: (a) the Bonds have been
called for redemption or are subject to redemption on an earlier call date, in
which case such call date will be deemed to be the date upon which they
mature; or (b) such Bonds are subject to a "mandatory tender" , in
which case such mandatory tender will be deemed to be the date upon which they
mature.
The effect of this method of sales charge computation will be that different
sales charge rates will be applied to each Trust based upon the estimated
long-term return life of such Trust's Portfolio, in accordance with the
following schedule:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years To Maturity
Years To Maturity Sales Charge Sales Charge
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1 1.010% 12 4.167%
2 1.266 13 4.275
3 1.579 14 4.384
4 1.781 15 4.493
5 2.041 16 4.603
6 2.302 17 4.712
7 2.564 18 4.822
8 3.093 19 4.932
9 3.627 20 5.042
10 4.058 21 to 30 5.152
11 4.112
</TABLE>
The sales charges in the above table are expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate bid prices of the Securities in a Trust. Expressed as a percent of
the Public Offering Price, the sales charge on a Trust consisting entirely of
a portfolio of Bonds with 15 years to maturity would be 4.30%. The sales
charge applicable to quantity purchases during the initial offering period is,
however, reduced on a graduated basis to any person acquiring 100 or more
Units as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Dollar Amount of Sales
Charge Reduction Per Unit
<S> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT, State and
Aggregate Number of National Quality IM-IT Short
Units Purchased Trusts Intermediate Trust Other Trusts
100-249 Units......... $4.00 $2.00 $4.00
250-499 Units......... $6.00 $3.00 $6.00
500-999 Units......... $14.00 $4.00 $9.00
1,000 or more Units... $19.00 $6.00 $11.00
</TABLE>
Any such reduced sales charge shall be the responsibility of the selling
Underwriter, broker, dealer or agent. The Sponsor will, however, increase the
concession or agency commission for such quantity purchases. See "Public
Offering--Unit Distribution" . This reduced sales charge structure will
apply on all purchases by the same person from any one Underwriter or dealer
of units of Van Kampen American Capital-sponsored unit investment trusts which
are being offered in the initial offering period (a) on any one day (the "
Initial Purchase Date" ) or (b) on any day subsequent to the Initial
Purchase Date, if (1) the units purchased are of a unit investment trust
purchased on the Initial Purchase Date, and (2) the person purchasing the
units purchased a sufficient amount of units on the Initial Purchase Date to
qualify for a reduced sales charge on such date. In the event units of more
than one trust are purchased on the Initial Purchase Date, the aggregate
dollar amount of such purchases will be used to determine whether purchasers
are eligible for a reduced sales charge. Such aggregate dollar amount will be
divided by the public offering price per unit (on the day preceding the date
of purchase) of each respective trust purchased to determine the total number
of units which such amount could have purchased of each individual trust.
Purchasers must then consult the applicable trust's prospectus to determine
whether the total number of units which could have been purchased of a
specific trust would have qualified for a reduced sales charge and, if so
qualified, the amount of such reduction. Assuming a purchaser qualifies for a
sales charge reduction or reductions, to determine the applicable sales charge
reduction or reductions it is necessary to accumulate all purchases made on
the Initial Purchase Date and all purchases made in accordance with (b) above.
Units purchased in the name of the spouse of a purchaser or in the name of a
child of such purchaser under 21 years of age will be deemed for the purposes
of calculating the applicable sales charge to be additional purchases by the
purchaser. The reduced sales charges will also be applicable to a trustee or
other fiduciary purchasing securities for one or more trust estate or
fiduciary accounts. Employees of Van Kampen American Capital Distributors Inc.
and its subsidiaries may purchase Units of the Trust at the current Public
Offering Price less the underwriting commission or less the dealer's
concession in the absence of an underwriting commission. Registered
representatives of selling Underwriters may purchase Units of the Fund at the
current Public Offering Price less the underwriting commission during the
initial offering period, and less the dealer's concession for secondary market
transactions. Registered representatives of selling brokers, dealers, or
agents may purchase Units of the Fund at the current Public Offering Price
less the dealer's concession during the initial offering period and for
secondary market transactions.
Units may be purchased in the primary or secondary market at the Public
Offering Price (for purchases which do not qualify for a sales charge
reduction for quantity purchases) less the concession the Sponsor typically
allows to brokers and dealers for purchases (see "Trust
Administration--General--Unit Distribution" ) by (1) investors who purchase
Units through registered investment advisers, certified financial planners and
registered broker-dealers who in each case either charge periodic fees for
financial planning, investment advisory or asset management services, or
provide such services in connection with the establishment of an investment
account for which a comprehensive "wrap fee" charge is imposed, (2)
bank trust departments investing funds over which they exercise exclusive
discretionary investment authority and that are held in a fiduciary, agency,
custodial or similar capacity, (3) any person who for at least 90 days, has
been an officer, director or bona fide employee of any firm offering Units for
sale to investors or their immediate family members (as described above) and
(4) officers and directors of bank holding companies that make Units available
directly or through subsidiaries or bank affiliates. Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary in this Prospectus, such investors, bank trust departments,
firm employees and bank holding company officers and directors who purchase
Units through this program will not receive sales charge reductions for
quantity purchases.
Offering Price. Public Offering Price of the Units will vary from the amounts
stated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information" in
accordance with fluctuations in the prices of the underlying Securities in
each Trust.
As indicated above, the price of the Units as of the date the Securities were
deposited in each Trust was determined by adding to the aggregate offering
price of the Securities of a Trust an amount equal to the applicable sales
charge expressed as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the
Securities and dividing the sum so obtained by the number of Units
outstanding. This computation produced a gross underwriting commission equal
to such sales charge expressed as a percentage of the Public Offering Price.
Such price determination as of the close of business on the day before the
Date of Deposit (except for the IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts as of 8:00
A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit) was made on the basis of an
evaluation of the Securities in each Trust prepared by Interactive Data
Corporation, a firm regularly engaged in the business of evaluating, quoting
or appraising comparable securities. After the close of business on the day
before the Date of Deposit (except for the IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts
as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit) and during the period of
initial offering, the Evaluator will appraise or cause to be appraised daily
the value of the underlying Securities of each Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern
time on days the New York Stock Exchange is open for business and will adjust
the Public Offering Price of the Units commensurate with such appraisal. Such
Public Offering Price will be effective for all orders received at or prior to
4:00 P.M. Eastern time on each such day. Orders received by the Trustee,
Sponsor or any Underwriter for purchases, sales or redemptions after that
time, or on a day when the New York Stock Exchange is closed, will be held
until the next determination of price. For secondary market sales the Public
Offering Price per Unit will be equal to the aggregate bid price of the
Securities in the Trust plus an amount equal to the applicable secondary
market sales charge expressed as a percentage of the aggregate bid price of
the Securities and dividing the sum so attained by the number of Units then
outstanding. This computation produces a gross commission equal to such sales
charge expressed as a percentage of the Public Offering Price. For secondary
market purposes such appraisal and adjustment with respect to a Trust will be
made by the Evaluator as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days in which the New
York Stock Exchange is open for each day on which any Unit of such Trust is
tendered for redemption, and it shall determine the aggregate value of any
Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on such other days as may be necessary.
The aggregate price of the Securities in each Trust has been and will be
determined on the basis of bid prices or offering prices, as is appropriate,
(a) on the basis of current market prices for the Securities obtained from
dealers or brokers who customarily deal in bonds comparable to those held by
the Fund; (b) if such prices are not available for any particular Securities,
on the basis of current market prices for comparable bonds; (c) by causing the
value of the Securities to be determined by others engaged in the practice of
evaluation, quoting or appraising comparable bonds; or (d) by any combination
of the above. Market prices of the Securities will generally fluctuate with
changes in market interest rates. Unless Bonds are in default in payment of
principal or interest or in significant risk of such default, the Evaluator
will not attribute any value to the insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any.
The Evaluator will consider in its evaluation of Bonds which are in default in
payment of principal or interest or, in the Sponsor's opinion, in significant
risk of such default (the "Defaulted Bonds" ) the value of the
insurance guaranteeing interest and principal payments. The value of the
insurance will be equal to the difference between (i) the market value of
Defaulted Bonds assuming the exercise of the right to obtain Permanent
Insurance (less the insurance premiums and related expenses attributable to
the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value of such
Defaulted Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. In addition, the Evaluator
will consider the ability of the affected Portfolio Insurer to meet its
commitments under any Trust insurance policy, including the commitments to
issue Permanent Insurance. It is the position of the Sponsor that this is a
fair method of valuing the Bonds and the insurance obtained by an Insured
Trust and reflects a proper valuation method in accordance with the provisions
of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
No value has been ascribed to insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any,
as of the date of this Prospectus.
The initial or primary Public Offering Price of the Units is equal to the
offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust plus the
applicable sales charge plus interest accrued but unpaid from the First
Settlement Date to the date of settlement. The secondary market Public
Offering Price is equal to the bid price per Unit of the Securities in each
Trust plus the applicable sales charge plus accrued interest. The offering
price of Securities in each Trust may be expected to average approximately
0.5%-1% more than the bid price of such Securities. On the Date of Deposit,
the offering side evaluations of the Securities in the Trusts were higher than
the bid side evaluations of such Securities by the respective amounts
indicated under footnote (5) in "Notes to Portfolios" .
Although payment is normally made three business days following the order for
purchase, payment may be made prior thereto. A person will become the owner of
Units on the date of settlement provided payment has been received. Cash, if
any, made available to the Sponsor prior to the date of settlement for the
purchase of Units may be used in the Sponsor's business and may be deemed to
be a benefit to the Sponsor, subject to the limitations of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Delivery of certificates representing Units so ordered
will be made three business days following such order or shortly thereafter.
See "Redemption of Units" below for information regarding the ability
to redeem Units ordered for purchase.
Market for Units. During the initial public offering period, the Sponsor
and/or certain of the Underwriters intend to offer to purchase Units at a
price equivalent to the Public Offering Price which is based upon the
aggregate offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust
plus accrued interest to the date of settlement less the related sales
commission. Afterward, although they are not obligated to do so, the Sponsor
intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may, maintain a market for
the Units offered hereby and to offer continuously to purchase such Units at
prices, subject to change at any time, based upon the aggregate bid prices of
the Securities in the portfolio of each Trust plus interest accrued to the
date of settlement and plus any principal cash on hand, less any amounts
representing taxes or other governmental charges payable out of the Trust and
less any accrued Trust expenses. If the supply of Units exceeds demand or if
some other business reason warrants it, the Sponsor and/or the Underwriters
may either discontinue all purchases of Units or discontinue purchases of
Units at such prices. In the event that a market is not maintained for the
Units and the Unitholder cannot find another purchaser, a Unitholder of any
Trust desiring to dispose of his Units may be able to dispose of such Units
only by tendering them to the Trustee for redemption at the Redemption Price,
which is based upon the aggregate bid price of the Securities in the portfolio
of such Trust plus any accrued interest. The aggregate bid prices of the
underlying Securities in a Trust are expected to be less than the related
aggregate offering prices. See "Redemption of Units" below. A
Unitholder who wishes to dispose of his Units should inquire of his broker as
to current market prices in order to determine whether there is in existence
any price in excess of the Redemption Price and, if so, the amount thereof.
Distributions of Interest and Principal. Interest received by the Fund,
including that part of the proceeds of any disposition of Securities which
represents accrued interest, is credited by the Trustee to the Interest
Account for the appropriate Trust. Other receipts are credited to the
Principal Account for the appropriate Trust. Interest received by the Fund
after deduction of amounts sufficient to reimburse the Trustee, without
interest, for any amounts advanced and paid to the Sponsor as the Unitholder
of record as of the First Settlement Date (see "Public Offering--Offering
Price" above) will be distributed on or shortly after the twenty-fifth day
of each month on a pro rata basis to Unitholders of record of a Trust as of
the preceding record date who are entitled to distributions at that time under
the plan of distributions chosen. All distributions will be net of applicable
expenses. The pro rata share of cash in the Principal Account of a Trust will
be computed as of the date set forth under "Per Unit Information" for
the applicable Trust, and thereafter as of the semi-annual record date, and
distributions to the Unitholders as of such record date will be made on or
shortly after the twenty-fifth day of such month. Proceeds received from the
disposition of any of the Securities after such record date and prior to the
following distribution date will be held in the Principal Account and not
distributed until the next distribution date. The Trustee is not required to
pay interest on funds held in any Principal or Interest Account (but may
itself earn interest thereon and therefore benefits from the use of such
funds) nor to make a distribution from the Principal Account unless the amount
available for distribution therein shall equal at least $1.00 per Unit.
However, should the amount available for distribution in the Principal Account
equal or exceed $10.00 per Unit, the Trustee will make a special distribution
from the Principal Account on the next succeeding monthly distribution date to
holders of record on the related monthly record date.
The distribution to the Unitholders of a Trust as of each record date after
the First Settlement Date will be made on the following distribution date or
shortly thereafter and shall consist of an amount substantially equal to such
portion of the Unitholder's pro rata share of the estimated net annual
interest income in the Interest Account of such Trust after deducting
estimated expenses attributable as is consistent with the distribution plan
chosen. Because interest payments are not received by the Fund at a constant
rate throughout the year, such interest distribution may be more or less than
the amount credited to such Interest Account as of the record date. For the
purpose of minimizing fluctuations in the distributions from an Interest
Account, the Trustee is authorized to advance such amounts as may be necessary
to provide interest distributions of approximately equal amounts. The Trustee
shall be reimbursed for any such advances from funds in the applicable
Interest Account on the ensuing record date. Persons who purchase Units
between a record date and a distribution date will receive their first
distribution on the second distribution date after the purchase, under the
applicable plan of distribution.
As of the first day of each month, the Trustee will deduct from the Interest
Account and, to the extent funds are not sufficient therein, from the
Principal Account, amounts necessary to pay the expenses of the Fund (as
determined on the basis set forth under "Trust Administration--Fund
Administration and Expenses" ). The Trustee also may withdraw from said
Accounts such amounts, if any, as it deems necessary to establish a reserve
for any governmental charges payable out of the Fund. Amounts so withdrawn
shall not be considered a part of the Fund's assets until such time as the
Trustee shall return all or any part of such amounts to the appropriate
Accounts. In addition, the Trustee may withdraw from the Interest and
Principal Accounts such amounts as may be necessary to cover purchases of
Replacement Bonds and redemptions of Units by the Trustee.
Reinvestment Option. Unitholders of all unit investment trusts sponsored by
Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc., may elect to have each
distribution of interest income, capital gains and/or principal on their Units
automatically reinvested in shares of any Van Kampen American Capital mutual
funds (except for B shares) which are registered in the Unitholder's state of
residence. Such mutual funds are hereinafter collectively referred to as the
"Reinvestment Funds" .
Each Reinvestment Fund has investment objectives which differ in certain
respects from those of the Trusts. The prospectus relating to each
Reinvestment Fund describes the investment policies of such fund and sets
forth the procedures to follow to commence reinvestment. A Unitholder may
obtain a prospectus for the respective Reinvestment Funds from Van Kampen
American Capital Distributors, Inc. at One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace,
Illinois 60181. Texas residents who desire to reinvest may request that a
broker-dealer registered in Texas send the prospectus relating to the
respective fund.
After becoming a participant in a reinvestment plan, each distribution of
interest income, capital gains and/or principal on the participant's Units
will, on the applicable distribution date, automatically be applied, as
directed by such person, as of such distribution date by the Trustee to
purchase shares (or fractions thereof) of the applicable Reinvestment Fund at
a net asset value as computed as of the close of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on such date. Unitholders with an existing Guaranteed Reinvestment
Option (GRO) Program account (whereby a sales charge is imposed on
distribution reinvestments) may transfer their existing account into a new GRO
account which allows purchases of Reinvestment Fund shares at net asset value
as described above.
Confirmations of all reinvestments by a Unitholder into a Reinvestment Fund
will be mailed to the Unitholder by such Reinvestment Fund. A participant may
at any time prior to five days preceding the next succeeding distribution
date, by so notifying the Trustee in writing, elect to terminate his or her
reinvestment plan and receive future distributions of his or her Units in
cash. There will be no charge or other penalty for such termination. Each
Reinvestment Fund, its sponsor and investment adviser shall have the right to
terminate at any time the reinvestment plan relating to such fund.
Unitholders of New York Trusts, other than residents of Massachusetts, may
elect to have distributions reinvested in shares of First Investors New York
Insured Tax Free Fund, Inc. subject to a sales charge of $1.50 per $100
reinvested (paid to First Investors Management Company, Inc.).
Redemption of Units. A Unitholder may redeem all or a portion of his Units by
tender to the Trustee, at its Unit Investment Trust Division, 101 Barclay
Street, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10286, of the certificates representing
the Units to be redeemed (or by written request if Units are not held in
certificated form), duly endorsed or accompanied by proper instruments of
transfer with signature guaranteed (or by providing satisfactory indemnity, as
in connection with lost, stolen or destroyed certificates) and by payment of
applicable governmental charges, if any. Thus, redemption of Units cannot be
effected until certificates representing such Units have been delivered to the
person seeking redemption or satisfactory indemnity provided. No redemption
fee will be charged. On the third business day following such tender the
Unitholder will be entitled to receive in cash an amount for each Unit equal
to the Redemption Price per Unit next computed after receipt by the Trustee of
such tender of Units. The "date of tender" is deemed to be the date on
which Units are received by the Trustee, except that as regards Units received
after 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange, the date of tender is the next day on which such Exchange is open
for trading and such Units will be deemed to have been tendered to the Trustee
on such day for redemption at the Redemption Price computed on that day.
Under regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service, the Trustee will be
required to withhold a specified percentage of the principal amount of a Unit
redemption if the Trustee has not been furnished the redeeming Unitholder's
tax identification number in the manner required by such regulations. Any
amount so withheld is transmitted to the Internal Revenue Service and may be
recovered by the Unitholder only when filing a return. Under normal
circumstances the Trustee obtains the Unitholder's tax identification number
from the selling broker. However, at any time a Unitholder elects to tender
Units for redemption, such Unitholder should provide a tax identification
number to the Trustee in order to avoid this possible "back-up
withholding" in the event the Trustee has not been previously provided
such number.
Accrued interest paid on redemption shall be withdrawn from the Interest
Account of such Trust or, if the balance therein is insufficient, from the
Principal Account of such Trust. All other amounts will be withdrawn from the
Principal Account of such Trust. The Trustee is empowered to sell underlying
Securities of a Trust in order to make funds available for redemption. Units
so redeemed shall be cancelled.
The Redemption Price per Unit (as well as the secondary market Public Offering
Price) will be determined on the basis of the bid price of the Securities in
each Trust, while the initial and primary Public Offering Price of Units will
be determined on the basis of the offering price of the Securities in each
Trust, as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on the date any such determination is made. On the Date of Deposit
the Public Offering Price per Unit (which is based on the offering prices of
the Bonds in each Trust and includes the sales charge) exceeded the value at
which Units could have been redeemed (based upon the current bid prices of the
Securities in such Trust) by the amount shown under "Summary of Essential
Financial Information" . While the Trustee has the power to determine the
Redemption Price per Unit when Units are tendered for redemption, such
authority has been delegated to the Evaluator which determines the price per
Unit on a daily basis. The Redemption Price per Unit is the pro rata share of
each Unit in each Trust on the basis of (i) the cash on hand in such Trust or
moneys in the process of being collected, (ii) the value of the Securities in
such Trust based on the bid prices of the Securities therein, except for cases
in which the value of insurance has been included, (iii) interest accrued
thereon, less (a) amounts representing taxes or other governmental charges
payable out of such Trust and (b) the accrued expenses of such Trust. The
Evaluator may determine the value of the Securities in each Trust by employing
any of the methods set forth in "Public Offering--Offering Price" . In
determining the Redemption Price per Unit no value will be assigned to the
portfolio insurance maintained on the Bonds in an Insured Trust unless such
Bonds are in default in payment of principal or interest or in significant
risk of such default. For a description of the situations in which the
Evaluator may value the insurance obtained by the Insured Trusts, see "
Public Offering--Offering Price" above.
The price at which Units may be redeemed could be less than the price paid by
the Unitholder and may be less than the par value of the Securities
represented by the Units so redeemed. As stated above, the Trustee may sell
Securities to cover redemptions. When Securities are sold, the size and
diversity of the affected Trust will be reduced. Such sales may be required at
a time when Securities would not otherwise be sold and might result in lower
prices than might otherwise be realized.
The right of redemption may be suspended and payment postponed for any period
during which the New York Stock Exchange is closed, other than for customary
weekend and holiday closings, or during which the Securities and Exchange
Commission determines that trading on that Exchange is restricted or an
emergency exists, as a result of which disposal or evaluation of the
Securities in the Trusts is not reasonably practicable, or for such other
periods as the Securities and Exchange Commission may by order permit. Under
certain extreme circumstances the Sponsor may apply to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for an order permitting a full or partial suspension of
the right of Unitholders to redeem their Units.
Reports Provided. The Trustee shall furnish Unitholders of a Trust in
connection with each distribution a statement of the amount of interest and
the amount of other receipts (received since the preceding distribution), if
any, being distributed expressed in each case as a dollar amount representing
the pro rata share of each Unit of a Trust outstanding. For as long as the
Trustee deems it to be in the best interests of the Unitholders, the accounts
of each Trust shall be audited, not less frequently than annually, by
independent certified public accountants and the report of such accountants
shall be furnished by the Trustee to Unitholders of such Trusts upon request.
Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year, the
Trustee shall furnish to each person who at any time during the calendar year
was a registered Unitholder of a Trust a statement (i) as to the Interest
Account: interest received (including amounts representing interest received
upon any disposition of Securities) and the percentage of such interest by
states in which the issuers of the Securities are located, deductions for
applicable taxes and for fees and expenses of such Trust, for purchases of
Replacement Bonds and for redemptions of Units, if any, and the balance
remaining after such distributions and deductions, expressed in each case both
as a total dollar amount and as a dollar amount representing the pro rata
share of each Unit outstanding on the last business day of such calendar year;
(ii) as to the Principal Account: the dates of disposition of any Securities
and the net proceeds received therefrom (excluding any portion representing
accrued interest), the amount paid for purchases of Replacement Bonds and for
redemptions of Units, if any, deductions for payment of applicable taxes and
fees and expenses of the Trustee, the amount of "when issued" interest
treated as a return of capital, if any, and the balance remaining after such
distributions and deductions expressed both as a total dollar amount and as a
dollar amount representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding on the
last business day of such calendar year; (iii) a list of the Securities held
and the number of Units outstanding on the last business day of such calendar
year; (iv) the Redemption Price per Unit based upon the last computation
thereof made during such calendar year; and (v) amounts actually distributed
during such calendar year from the Interest and Principal Accounts, separately
stated, expressed both as total dollar amounts and as dollar amounts
representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding.
In order to comply with Federal and state tax reporting requirements,
Unitholders will be furnished, upon request to the Trustee, evaluations of the
Securities in a Trust furnished to it by the Evaluator.
Each distribution statement of a Trust will reflect pertinent information in
respect of the other plan of distribution so that Unitholders may be informed
regarding the results of such other plan of distribution.
INSURANCE ON THE BONDS IN THE INSURED TRUSTS
Insurance has been obtained by each Insured Trust or by the issuer of such
Bonds, or by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds in a Trust guaranteeing prompt payment of interest and
principal, when due, in respect of the Bonds in such Trust. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and
Securities Selection" . An insurance policy obtained by an Insured Trust,
if any, is non-cancellable and will continue in force so long as such Trust is
in existence, the respective Portfolio Insurer referred to below is still in
business and the Bonds described in such policy continue to be held by such
Trust (see "Portfolio" for the respective Insured Trust). Any
portfolio insurance premium for an Insured Trust, which is an obligation of
such Trust, is paid by each Trust on a monthly basis. Non-payment of premiums
on a policy obtained by an Insured Trust will not result in the cancellation
of insurance but will force the insurer to take action against the Trustee to
recover premium payments due it. The Trustee in turn will be entitled to
recover such payments from such Trust. Premium rates for each issue of Bonds
protected by a policy obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, are fixed for the
life of the Trust. The premium for any Preinsured Bond insurance has been paid
by such issuer, by a prior owner of such Bonds or the Sponsor and any such
policy or policies are non-cancellable and will continue in force so long as
the Bonds so insured are outstanding and the respective Preinsured Bond
Insurer remains in business. If the provider of an original issuance insurance
policy is unable to meet its obligations under such policy or if the rating
assigned to the claims-paying ability of any such insurer deteriorates, the
Portfolio Insurers have no obligation to insure any issue adversely affected
by either of the above described events.
The aforementioned portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any,
guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on the Bonds as they
fall due. For the purposes of insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, "
when due" generally means the stated maturity date for the payment of
principal and interest. However, in the event (a) an issuer of a Bond defaults
in the payment of principal or interest on such Bond, (b) such issuer enters
into a bankruptcy proceeding or (c) the maturity of such Bond is accelerated,
the affected Portfolio Insurer has the option, in its sole discretion, after
receiving notice of the earliest to occur of such a default, bankruptcy
proceeding or acceleration to pay the outstanding principal amount of such
Bond plus accrued interest to the date of such payment and thereby retire the
Bond from the affected Trust prior to such Bond's stated maturity date. The
insurance does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the
Units. Insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, is only effective as to
Bonds owned by and held in such Trust. In the event of a sale of any such Bond
by the Trustee, such insurance terminates as to such Bond on the date of sale.
Pursuant to an irrevocable commitment of the Portfolio Insurers, the Trustee,
upon the sale of a Bond covered under a portfolio insurance policy obtained by
an Insured Trust, has the right to obtain permanent insurance with respect to
such Bond (i.e., insurance to maturity of the Bonds regardless of the identity
of the holder thereof) (the "Permanent Insurance" ) upon the payment of
a single predetermined insurance premium and any expenses related thereto from
the proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any Bond in an Insured
Trust is eligible to be sold on an insured basis. It is expected that the
Trustee would exercise the right to obtain Permanent Insurance only if upon
such exercise the affected Trust would receive net proceeds (sale of Bond
proceeds less the insurance premium and related expenses attributable to the
Permanent Insurance) from such sale in excess of the sale proceeds if such
Bonds were sold on an uninsured basis. The insurance premium with respect to
each Bond eligible for Permanent Insurance would be determined based upon the
insurability of each Bond as of the Date of Deposit and would not be increased
or decreased for any change in the creditworthiness of each Bond.
The Sponsor believes that the Permanent Insurance option provides an advantage
to an Insured Trust in that each Bond insured by a Trust insurance policy may
be sold out of the affected Trust with the benefits of the insurance attaching
thereto. Thus, the value of the insurance, if any, at the time of sale, can be
realized in the market value of the Bond so sold (which is not the case in
connection with any value attributable to an Insured Trust's portfolio
insurance). See "Public Offering--Offering Price" . Because any such
insurance value may be realized in the market value of the Bond upon the sale
thereof upon exercise of the Permanent Insurance option, the Sponsor
anticipates that (a) in the event an Insured Trust were to be comprised of a
substantial percentage of Bonds in default or significant risk of default, it
is much less likely that such Trust would need at some point in time to seek a
suspension of redemptions of Units than if such Trust were to have no such
option (see "Public Offering--Redemption of Units" ) and (b) at the
time of termination of an Insured Trust, if such Trust were holding defaulted
Bonds or Bonds in significant risk of default such Trust would not need to
hold such Bonds until their respective maturities in order to realize the
benefits of such Trust's portfolio insurance (see "Trust
Administration--Amendment or Termination" ).
Except as indicated below, insurance obtained by an Insured Trust has no
effect on the price or redemption value of Units. It is the present intention
of the Evaluator to attribute a value for such insurance (including the right
to obtain Permanent Insurance) for the purpose of computing the price or
redemption value of Units if the Bonds covered by such insurance are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default. The value of the insurance will be the difference between (i) the
market value of a Bond which is in default in payment of principal or interest
or in significant risk of such default assuming the exercise of the right to
obtain Permanent Insurance (less the insurance premium and related expenses
attributable to the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value
of such Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. See "Public
Offering--Offering Price" . It is also the present intention of the Trustee
not to sell such Bonds to effect redemptions or for any other reason but
rather to retain them in the portfolio because value attributable to the
insurance cannot be realized upon sale. See "Public Offering--Offering
Price" herein for a more complete description of an Insured Trust's method
of valuing defaulted Bonds and Bonds which have a significant risk of default.
Insurance obtained by the issuer of a Bond is effective so long as such Bond
is outstanding. Therefore, any such insurance may be considered to represent
an element of market value in regard to the Bonds thus insured, but the exact
effect, if any, of this insurance on such market value cannot be predicted.
The portfolio insurance policy or policies obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any, with respect to the Bonds in such Trust were issued by one or more of the
Portfolio Insurers. Any other Preinsured Bond insurance policy (or commitment
therefor) was issued by one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and
Securities Selection" .
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity" ) is a
Wisconsin-domiciled stock insurance corporation regulated by the Office of the
Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Wisconsin and licensed to do
business in 50 states, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, with admitted assets of approximately $2,145,000,000 (unaudited) and
statutory capital of approximately $782,000,000 (unaudited) as of December 31,
1994. Statutory capital consists of AMBAC Indemnity's policyholders' surplus
and statutory contingency reserve. AMBAC Indemnity is an affiliate of AMBAC
Inc., a 100% publicly-held company. Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and
Standard & Poor's have both assigned a triple-A claims-paying ability rating
to AMBAC Indemnity.
Copies of its financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting standards are available from AMBAC Indemnity. The address of AMBAC
Indemnity's administrative offices and its telephone number are One State
Street Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, 10004 and (212) 668-0340.
AMBAC Indemnity has entered into quota share reinsurance agreements under
which a percentage of the insurance underwritten pursuant to certain municipal
bond insurance programs of AMBAC Indemnity has been and will be assumed by a
number of foreign and domestic unaffiliated reinsurers.
MBIA Insurance Corporation ("MBIA" ) is the principal operating
subsidiary of MBIA Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed company. MBIA Inc.
is not obligated to pay the debts of or claims against MBIA. MBIA is a limited
liability corporation rather than a several liability association. MBIA is
domiciled in the State of New York and licensed to do business in all fifty
states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United
States and the Territory of Guam. As of September 30, 1995 MBIA had admitted
assets of $3.7 billion (unaudited), total liabilities of $2.5 billion
(unaudited), and total capital and surplus of $1.2 billion (unaudited)
determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or
permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. As of December 31, 1994, the
Insurer had admitted assets of $3.4 billion (audited), total liabilities of
$2.3 billion (audited), and total capital and surplus of $1.1 billion
(audited) determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. Copies of MBIA's
year end financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting
practices are available from MBIA. The address of MBIA is 113 King Street,
Armonk, New York 10504.
Effective December 31, 1989, MBIA Inc. acquired Bond Investors Group, Inc. On
January 5, 1990, MBIA acquired all of the outstanding stock of Bond Investors
Group, Inc., the parent of Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance Company (BIG),
now known as MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois. Through a reinsurance
agreement, BIG has ceded all of its net insured risks, as well as its unearned
premium and contingency reserves, to MBIA and MBIA has reinsured BIG's net
outstanding exposure.
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rates all bond issues insured by MBIA "
Aaa" and short term loans "MIG 1," both designated to be of the
highest quality.
Standard & Poor's rates all new issues insured by MBIA "AAA" Prime
Grade.
The Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating of MBIA should be evaluated
independently of the Standard & Poor's rating of MBIA. No application has been
made to any other rating agency in order to obtain additional ratings on the
Bonds. The ratings reflect the respective rating agency's current assessment
of the creditworthiness of MBIA and its ability to pay claims on its policies
of insurance. Any further explanation as to the significance of the above
ratings may be obtained only from the applicable rating agency.
The above ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Bonds, and
such ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the
rating agencies. Any downward revision or withdrawal of either or both ratings
may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds.
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty" or "
FGIC" ) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of FGIC Corporation (the "
Corporation" ), a Delaware holding company. The Corporation is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC"
). Neither the Corporation nor GECC is obligated to pay the debts of or the
claims against Financial Guaranty. Financial Guaranty is domiciled in the
State of New York and is subject to regulation by the State of New York
Insurance Department. As of December 31, 1995, the total capital and surplus
of Financial Guaranty was approximately $1,000,520,000. Copies of Financial
Guaranty's financial statements, prepared on the basis of statutory accounting
principles, and the Corporation's financial statements, prepared on the basis
of generally accepted accounting principles, may be obtained by writing to
Financial Guaranty at 115 Broadway, New York, New York 10006, Attention:
Communications Department, telephone number: (212) 312-3000 or to the New York
State Insurance Department at 160 West Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, New
York 10013, Attention: Property Companies Bureau, telephone number: (212)
621-0389.
In addition, Financial Guaranty Insurance Company is currently licensed to
write insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. ("Financial Security" or "
FSA" ) is a monoline insurance company incorporated on March 16, 1984 under
the laws of the State of New York. The operations of Financial Security
commenced on July 25, 1985, and Financial Security received its New York State
insurance license on September 23, 1985. Financial Security and its two
wholly-owned subsidiaries are licensed to engage in the financial guaranty
insurance business in 49 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
Financial Security and its subsidiaries are engaged exclusively in the
business of writing financial guaranty insurance, principally in respect of
asset-backed and other collateralized securities offered in domestic and
foreign markets. Financial Security and its subsidiaries also write financial
guaranty insurance in respect of municipal and other obligations and reinsure
financial guaranty insurance policies written by other leading insurance
companies. In general, financial guaranty insurance consists of the issuance
of a guaranty of scheduled payments of an issuer's securities, thereby
enhancing the credit rating of those securities, in consideration for payment
of a premium to the insurer.
Financial Security is approximately 91.6% owned by U S WEST, Inc. and 8.4%
owned by The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. ("Tokio Marine"
). Neither U S WEST, Inc. nor Tokio Marine is obligated to pay the debts of or
the claims against Financial Security. Financial Security is domiciled in the
State of New York and is subject to regulation by the State of New York
Insurance Department. As of March 31, 1993, the total policyholders' surplus
and contingency reserves and the total unearned premium reserve, respectively,
of Financial Security and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, approximately $479,110,000
(unaudited) and $220,078,000 (unaudited), and the total shareholders' equity
and the total unearned premium reserve, respectively, of Financial Security
and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, approximately $628,119,000 (unaudited) and $202,493,000
(unaudited). Copies of Financial Security's financial statements may be
obtained by writing to Financial Security at 350 Park Avenue, New York, New
York, 10022, Attention: Communications Department. Its telephone number is
(212) 826-0100.
Pursuant to an intercompany agreement, liabilities on financial guaranty
insurance written by Financial Security or either of its subsidiaries are
reinsured among such companies on an agreed-upon percentage substantially
proportional to their respective capital, surplus and reserves, subject to
applicable statutory risk limitations. In addition, Financial Security
reinsures a portion of its liabilities under certain of its financial guaranty
insurance policies with unaffiliated reinsurers under various quota share
treaties and on a transaction-by-transaction basis. Such reinsurance is
utilized by Financial Security as a risk management device and to comply with
certain statutory and rating agency requirements; it does not alter or limit
Financial Security's obligations under any financial guaranty insurance policy.
Financial Security's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa" by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc., and "AAA" by Standard & Poor's, Nippon
Investors Service Inc., Duff & Phelps Inc. and Australian Ratings Pty. Ltd.
Such ratings reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies, are not
recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
Capital Guaranty Insurance Company ("Capital Guaranty" ) is a "
Aaa/AAA" rated monoline stock insurance company incorporated in the State
of Maryland, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital Guaranty Corporation,
a Maryland insurance holding company. Capital Guaranty Corporation is a
publicly owned company whose shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Capital Guaranty is authorized to provide insurance in all 50 states, the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S.
Virgin Islands. Capital Guaranty focuses on insuring municipal securities and
our policies guaranty the timely payment of principal and interest when due
for payment on new issue and secondary market issue municipal bond
transactions. Capital Guaranty's claims-paying ability is rated "
Triple-A" by both Moody's and Standard & Poor's. Therefore, if Capital
Guaranty insures an issue with a stand alone rating of less than "
Triple-A," such issue would be "upgraded" to "Aaa/AAA" by
virtue of Capital Guaranty's Insurance.
As of September 30, 1995, Capital Guaranty had more than $19.0 billion in net
exposure outstanding (excluding defeased issues). The total statutory
policyholders' surplus and contingency reserve of Capital Guaranty was
$204,642,000, and the total admitted assets were $326,802,226 as reported to
the Insurance Department of the State of Maryland as of September 30, 1995.
Financial statements for Capital Guaranty Insurance Company, that have been
prepared in accordance with statutory insurance accounting standards, are
available upon request. The address of Capital Guaranty's headquarters and its
telephone number are Steuart Tower, 22nd Floor, One Market Plaza, San
Francisco, CA 94105-1413 and (415) 995-8000.
CapMAC is a New York-domiciled monoline stock insurance company which engages
only in the business of financial guarantee and surety insurance. CapMAC is
licensed in 50 states in addition to the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the territory of Guam. CapMAC insures
structured asset-backed, corporate, municipal and other financial obligations
in the U.S. and international capital markets. CapMAC also provides financial
guarantee reinsurance for structured asset-backed, corporate, municipal and
other financial obligations written by other major insurance companies.
CapMAC's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa" by Moody's Investors
Service, Inc., "AAA" by Standard & Poor's, "AAA" by Duff &
Phelps Credit Rating Co. and "AAA" by Nippon Investors Service Inc.
Such ratings reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies, are not
recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
CapMAC is wholly-owned by CapMAC Holdings Inc. ("Holdings" ), a company
that is owned by a group of institutional and other investors, including
CapMAC's management and employees. Neither Holdings nor any of its
stockholders is obligated to pay any claims under any policy issued by CapMAC
or any debts of CapMAC or to make additional capital contributions.
CapMAC is regulated by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New
York. In addition, CapMAC is subject to regulation by the insurance
departments of the other jurisdictions in which it is licensed. Such insurance
laws regulate, among other things, the amount of net exposure per risk that
CapMAC may retain, capital transfers, dividends, investment of assets, changes
in control, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and acquisitions.
CapMAC is subject to periodic regulatory examinations by the same regulatory
authorities.
CapMAC's obligations under the Policy(s) may be reinsured. Such reinsurance
does not relieve CapMAC of any of its obligations under the Policy(s).
THE POLICY IS NOT COVERED BY THE PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE SECURITY FUND
SPECIFIED IN ARTICLE 76 OF THE NEW YORK INSURANCE LAW.
As at December 31, 1994 and 1993, CapMAC had qualified statutory capital
(which consists of policyholders' surplus and contingency reserve) of
approximately $170 million and $168 million, respectively, and had not
incurred any debt obligations. Article 69 of the New York State Insurance Law
requires CapMAC to establish and maintain the contingency reserve, which is
available to cover claims under policies issued by CapMAC.
Copies of CapMAC's financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting standards, which differ from generally accepted accounting
principles, and filed with the Insurance Department of the State of New York
are available upon request. CapMAC is located at 885 Third Avenue, New York,
New York 10022, and its telephone number is (212) 755-1155.
In order to be in an Insured Trust, Bonds must be insured by one of the
Preinsured Bond Insurers or be eligible for the insurance being obtained by
such Trust. In determining eligibility for insurance, the Preinsured Bond
Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and Financial Guaranty have applied their own
standards which correspond generally to the standards they normally use in
establishing the insurability of new issues of municipal bonds and which are
not necessarily the criteria used in the selection of Bonds by the Sponsor. To
the extent the standards of the Preinsured Bond Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and
Financial Guaranty are more restrictive than those of the Sponsor, the
previously stated Trust investment criteria have been limited with respect to
the Bonds. This decision is made prior to the Date of Deposit, as debt
obligations not eligible for insurance are not deposited in an Insured Trust.
Thus, all of the Bonds in the portfolios of the Insured Trusts in the Fund are
insured either by the respective Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds, by a
prior owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Bonds
in a Trust.
Because the Bonds are insured by one of the Portfolio Insurers or one of the
Preinsured Bond Insurers as to the timely payment of principal and interest,
when due, and on the basis of the various reinsurance agreements in effect,
Standard & Poor's has assigned to the Units of each Insured Trust its "
AAA" investment rating. Such rating will be in effect for a period of
thirteen months from the Date of Deposit and will, unless renewed, terminate
at the end of such period. See "Description of Securities Ratings" .
The obtaining of this rating by an Insured Trust should not be construed as an
approval of the offering of the Units by Standard & Poor's or as a guarantee
of the market value of such Trust or of the Units.
An objective of portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is to obtain
a higher yield on the portfolio of such Trust than would be available if all
the Securities in such portfolio had Standard & Poor's "AAA" rating
and yet at the same time to have the protection of insurance of prompt payment
of interest and principal, when due, on the Bonds. There is, of course, no
certainty that this result will be achieved. Preinsured Bonds in an Insured
Trust (all of which are rated "AAA" by Standard & Poor's) may or may
not have a higher yield than uninsured bonds rated "AAA" by Standard &
Poor's. In selecting such Bonds for an Insured Trust, the Sponsor has applied
the criteria hereinbefore described.
In the event of nonpayment of interest or principal, when due, in respect of a
Bond, AMBAC Indemnity shall make such payment not later than 30 days and
Financial Guaranty shall make such payment within one business day after the
respective insurer has been notified that such nonpayment has occurred or is
threatened (but not earlier than the date such payment is due). The insurer,
as regards any payment it may make, will succeed to the rights of the Trustee
in respect thereof. All policies issued by the Portfolio Insurers and the
Preinsured Bond Insurers are substantially identical insofar as obligations to
an Insured Trust are concerned.
The Internal Revenue Service has issued a letter ruling which holds in effect
that insurance proceeds representing maturing interest on defaulted municipal
obligations paid to holders of insured bonds, under policy provisions
substantially identical to the policies described herein, will be excludable
from Federal gross income under Section 103(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code
to the same extent as if such payments were made by the issuer of the
municipal obligations. Holders of Units in an Insured Trust should discuss
with their tax advisers the degree of reliance which they may place on this
letter ruling. However, Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, has given
an opinion to the effect such payment of proceeds would be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations. See
"Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
Each Portfolio Insurer is subject to regulation by the department of insurance
in the state in which it is qualified to do business. Such regulation,
however, is no guarantee that each Portfolio Insurer will be able to perform
on its contract of insurance in the event a claim should be made thereunder at
some time in the future. At the date hereof, it is reported that no claims
have been submitted or are expected to be submitted to any of the Portfolio
Insurers which would materially impair the ability of any such company to meet
its commitment pursuant to any contract of bond or portfolio insurance.
The information relating to each Portfolio Insurer has been furnished by such
companies. The financial information with respect to each Portfolio Insurer
appears in reports filed with state insurance regulatory authorities and is
subject to audit and review by such authorities. No representation is made
herein as to the accuracy or adequacy of such information or as to the absence
of material adverse changes in such information subsequent to the dates
thereof.
The Bonds in the Insured Trusts are insured as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Bonds insured Bonds insured
under AMBAC under Financial
Trust Indemnity Guaranty Preinsured Total
portfolio insurance portfolio insurance Bonds
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT................ -- -- 100% 100%
California IM-IT..... -- -- 100% 100%
Florida IM-IT........ -- -- 100% 100%
Michigan IM-IT....... -- -- 100% 100%
Minnesota IM-IT...... -- -- 100% 100%
New Jersey IM-IT..... -- -- 100% 100%
Pennsylvania IM-IT... -- -- 100% 100%
</TABLE>
The breakdown of the Preinsured Bonds is as follows: IM-IT -- AMBAC Indemnity
14%, Financial Guaranty 21%, MBIA 45% and FSA 9% and CapMAC 11%; California
IM-IT Trust -- AMBAC Indemnity 31%, Financial Guaranty 3%, MBIA 32% and FSA
34%; Florida IM-IT Trust -- AMBAC Indemnity 25%, Financial Guaranty 15% and
MBIA 60%; Michigan IM-IT Trust -- Financial Guaranty 29% and MBIA 71%;
Minnesota IM-IT Trust -- AMBAC Indemnity 44%, Financial Guaranty 7%, MBIA 33%
and FSA 16%; New Jersey IM-IT Trust -- AMBAC Indemnity 6%, Financial Guaranty
30%, MBIA 49% and FSA 15%; Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust -- AMBAC Indemnity 44%,
Financial Guaranty 35%, MBIA 13% and FSA 8%.
IM-IT
General. The IM-IT consists of 18 issues of Securities. Nine of the Bonds in
the IM-IT are general obligations of the governmental entities issuing them
and are backed by the taxing power therof. The remaining issues are payable
from the income of a specific project or authority and are not supported by
the issuer's power to levy taxes. These issues are located in 9 states or
territories, divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount
to total IM-IT) as follows: General Obligations, 9 (41%); Higher Education, 3
(24%); Public Building, 2 (22%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (4%); Tax District, 1
(4%); Waste Disposal, 1 (3%) and Health Care, 1 (2%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating. The dollar weighted average maturity of the
Bonds in the Trust is 28 years.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................. $ 55.18 $ 55.18
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>.............................. $ 2.18 $ 1.69
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit...................... -- --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 53.00 $ 53.49
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 53.00 $ 53.49
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively......................................... $ 4.42 $ 26.75
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit...................... $ .14723 $ .14859
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>... 5.30% 5.35%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>.................................... 5.36% 5.41%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996).......................... $ 5.45
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (June 1996)..................... $ 9.96
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................ $ 4.42 $ 26.75
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>...... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the IM-IT
Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--June and December
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
June and December commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.06
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued" Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated Annual
Interest Income per Unit will be increased to $55.24. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $2.24 and $1.75 under the
monthly and semi-annual distribution plans, respectively; and Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."
<F2>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F4>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 369 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Offering
Aggregate Maturity Date of either Bonds Deposited or Bonds Redemption Price To
Principal<F1> Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> IM-IT<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 50,000 Okemos Public Schools, County of Ingham,
Michigan, 1993 Refunding Bonds (Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation) MBIA Insured #0.00%
Due 5/1/2020..................................... AAA 11,871 <F6>
120,000 West Ottawa Public Schools, County of Ottawa,
State of Michigan, 1992 Refunding Bonds (General
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) FGIC Insured #0.00%
Due 5/1/2020..................................... AAA 28,490 <F6>
500,000 Calipatria Unified School District, Imperial
County, California, General Obligation Bonds,
Series 1996A (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2006 @ 102
#5.80% Due 8/1/2020 ............................. AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 496,035
220,000 Oak Grove School District (County of Santa
Clara, California General Obligation Bonds,
Election of 1995, Series 1996A (MBIA Insured) 2003 @ 101
#5.00% Due 8/1/2020.............................. AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 194,390
390,000 City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and
Power Revenue Bonds, Series 1995A (MBIA Insured)
#5.70% Due 9/1/2020............................ AAA 2005 @ 102 381,904
200,000 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York,
Leake and Watts Services, Inc., Insured Revenue
Bonds, Series 1994 (MBIA Insured) #6.00% Due 2004 @ 102
7/1/2023......................................... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 202,500
1,000,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Canisius
College, Insure Revenue Bonds, Series 1995 2005 @ 102
(CapMac Insured) 5.60% Due 7/1/2023............ AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 964,470
1,000,000 Rhode Island Health and Educational Building
Corporation, Higher Education Facility Revenue
and Refunding Bonds, Board of Governors for
Higher Education, Auxiliary Enterprise Revenue
Issue, Series 1993A (MBIA Insured) #5.25% Due 2003 @ 102
9/15/2023........................................ AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 908,990
355,000 The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Los Angeles, California (Bunker Hill
Redevelopment Project) Tax Allocation Refunding
Bonds, Series H (FSA Insured) #5.625% Due 2003 @ 102
12/1/2023........................................ AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 341,176
1,000,000 Louisiana Stadium & Exposition District, Hotel
Occupancy Tax & Stadium Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 1994A (FGIC Insured) #6.00% Due 2004 @ 102
7/1/2024......................................... AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 1,012,490
175,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds, Series G-1 (New
England Medical Center Hospitals Issue) MBIA 2004 @ 102
Insured #5.375% Due 7/1/2024................... AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 162,172
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 369 (IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Offering
Aggregate Maturity Date of either Bonds Deposited or Bonds Redemption Price To
Principal<F1> Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> IM-IT<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 300,000 City of Chicago, Illinois, Project and Refunding
General Obligation Bonds, Series 1995B (FGIC
Insured) #5.125% Due 1/1/2025.................. AAA 2006 @ 102 $ 266,835
500,000 Paw Paw Public School District, County of Van
Buren, Michigan, 1995 School Building and Site
Bonds (General Obligation-Unlimited Tax) FGIC 2005 @ 100
Insured #5.625% Due 5/1/2025................... AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 482,210
1,000,000 Regional Transportation Authority, Cook, DuPage,
Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties, Illinois,
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1996 2005 @ 102
(MBIA Insured) #5.60% Due 6/1/2025............. AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 956,720
1,000,000 Ernest N. Morial - New Orleans Exhibition Hall
Authority, Louisiana, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006 @ 101
C (MBIA Insured) #5.60% Due 7/15/2025.......... AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 964,650
500,000 School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
Unlimited Tax-General Obligation Bonds, Series
1995B (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.50% Due 2005 @ 101
09/01/2025....................................... AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 473,375
500,000 Jefferson Union High School District (County of
San Mateo, California) General Obligation Bonds,
Election 1995, Series A (FSA Insured)** 5.95% 2004 @ 102
Due 8/1/2026..................................... AAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 503,115
250,000 Beaver County Industrial Development Authority,
Pennsylvania, Pollution Control Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Pennsylvania Power Company
Beaver Valley Project) Series 1995A (AMBAC
Indemnity Insured) 6.00% Due 9/1/2028.......... AAA 2005 @ 102 253,288
$9,060,000 $ 8,604,681
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
CALIFORNIA IM-IT TRUST
General. The California IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities. Three
of the Bonds in the California IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total California IM-IT Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 3 (42%); Public
Building, 2 (21%); Health Care, 1 (17%); Tax District, 1 (17%) and General
Purpose, 1 (3%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. The Trust will invest substantially all of its assets in
California Municipal Obligations. The Trust is therefore susceptible to
political, economic or regulatory factors affecting issuers of California
Municipal Obligations. These include the possible adverse effects of certain
California constitutional amendments, legislative measures, voter initiatives
and other matters that are described below. The following information provides
only a brief summary of the complex factors affecting the financial situation
in California (the "State" ) and is derived from sources that are
generally available to investors and are believed to be accurate. No
independent verification has been made of the accuracy or completeness of any
of the following information. It is based in part on information obtained from
various State and local agencies in California or contained in official
statements for various California Municipal Obligations.
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local governmental finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of California Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Trust or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
California's economy is the largest among the 50 states and one of the largest
in the world. The State's population of almost 32 million represents 12.3% of
the total United States population and grew by 27% in the 1980s. While the
State's substantial population growth during the 1980s stimulated local
economic growth and diversification and sustained a real estate boom between
1984 and 1990, it has increased strains on the State's limited water resources
and its infrastructure. Resultant traffic congestion, school over-crowding and
high housing costs have increased demands for government services and may
impede future economic growth. Population growth has slowed between 1991 and
1993 even while substantial immigration has continued, due to a significant
increase in outmigration by California residents. Generally, the household
incomes of new residents have been departing households, which may have a
major long-term socioeconomic and fiscal impact. However, with the California
economy improving, the recent net outmigration within the Continental U.S. is
expected to decrease or be reversed.
From mid-1990 to late 1993, the State's economy suffered its worst recession
since the 1930s, with recovery starting later than for the nation as a whole.
The State has experienced the worst job losses of any post-war recession.
Prerecession job levels may not be realized until near the end of the decade.
The largest job losses have been in Southern California, led by declines in
the aerospace and construction industries. Weakness statewide occurred in
manufacturing, construction, services and trade. Additional military base
closures will have further adverse effects on the State's economy later in the
decade.
Since the start of 1994, the California economy has shown signs of steady
recovery and growth. The State Department of Finance reports net job growth,
particularly in construction and related manufacturing, wholesale and retail
trade, transportation, recreation and services. This growth has offset the
continuing but slowing job losses in the aerospace industry and restructuring
of the finance and utility sectors, Unemployment in the State was down
substantially in 1994 from its 10% peak in January, 1994, but still remains
higher than the national average rate. Retail sales were up strongly in 1994
from year-earlier figures. Delay or slowdown in recovery will adversely affect
State revenues.
Certain California Municipal Obligations may be obligations of issuers which
rely in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, on ad valorem property taxes
as a source of revenue. The taxing powers of California local governments and
districts are limited by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, enacted
by the voters in 1978 and commonly known as "Proposition 13." Briefly,
Article XIIIA limits to 1% of full cash value the rate of ad valorem property
taxes on real property and generally restricts the reassessment of property to
2% per year, except upon new construction or change of ownership (subject to a
number of exemptions). Taxing entities may, however, raise ad valorem taxes
above the 1% limit to pay debt service on voter-approved bonded indebtedness.
Under Article XIIIA, the basic 1% ad valorem tax levy is applied against the
assessed value of property as of the owner's date of acquisition (or as of
March 1, 1975, if acquired earlier), subject to certain adjustments. This
system has resulted in widely varying amounts of tax on similarly situated
properties. Several lawsuits have been filed challenging the acquisition-based
assessment system of Proposition 13, and on June 18, 1992 the U.S. Supreme
Court announced a decision upholding Proposition 13.
Article XIIIA prohibits local governments from raising revenues through ad
valorem property taxes above the 1% limit; it also requires voters of any
governmental unit to give two-thirds approval to levy any "special
tax." Court decisions, however, allowed non-voter approved levy of "
general taxes" which were not dedicated to a specific use. In response to
these decisions, the voters of the State in 1986 adopted an initiative statute
which imposed significant new limits on the ability of local entities to raise
or levy general taxes, except by receiving majority local voter approval.
Significant elements of this initiative, "Proposition 62," have been
overturned in recent court cases. An initiative proposed to re-enact the
provisions of Proposition 62 as a constitutional amendment was defeated by the
voters in November 1990, but such a proposal may be renewed in the future.
California and its local governments are subject to an annual "
appropriations limit" imposed by Article XIIIB of the California
Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1979 and significantly amended by
Propositions 98 and 111 in 1988 and 1990, respectively. Article XIIIB
prohibits the State or any covered local government from spending "
appropriations subject to limitation" in excess of the appropriations
limit imposed. "Appropriations subject to limitation" are
authorizations to spend "proceeds of taxes," which consists of tax
revenues and certain other funds, including proceeds from regulatory licenses,
user charges or other fees, to the extent that such proceeds exceed the cost
of providing the product or service, but "proceeds of taxes" excludes
most State subventions to local governments. No limit is imposed on
appropriations of funds which are not "proceeds of taxes," such as
reasonable user charges or fees and certain other non-tax funds, including
bond proceeds.
Among the expenditures not included in the Article XIIIB appropriations limit
are (1) the debt service cost of bonds issued or authorized prior to January
1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, (2) appropriations arising
from certain emergencies declared by the Governor, (3) appropriations for
certain capital outlay projects, (4) appropriations by the State of post-1989
increases in gasoline taxes and vehicle weight fees, and (5) appropriations
made in certain cases of emergency.
The appropriations limit for each year is adjusted annually to reflect changes
in cost of living and population, and any transfers of service
responsibilities between government units. The definitions for such
adjustments were liberalized in 1990 by Proposition 111 to follow more closely
growth in California's economy.
"Excess" revenues are measured over a two-year cycle. With respect to
local governments, excess revenues must be returned by a revision of tax rates
or fee schedules within the two subsequent fiscal years. The appropriations
limit for a local government may be overridden by referendum under certain
conditions for up to four years at a time. With respect to the State, 50% of
any excess revenues is to be distributed to K-12 school districts and
community college districts (collectively, "K-14 districts" ) and the
other 50% is to be refunded to taxpayers. With more liberal annual adjustment
factors since 1988, and depressed revenues since 1990 because of the
recession, few governments, including the State, are currently operating near
their spending limits, but this condition may change over time. Local
governments may by voter approval exceed their spending limits for up to four
years.
Because of the complex nature of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB of the California
Constitution, the ambiguities and possible inconsistencies in their terms, and
the impossibility of predicting future appropriations or changes in population
and cost of living, and the probability of continuing legal challenges, it is
not currently possible to determine fully the impact of Article XIIIA or
Article XIIIB on California Municipal Obligations or on the ability of
California or local governments to pay debt service on such California
Municipal Obligations. It is not presently possible to predict the outcome of
any pending litigation with respect to the ultimate scope, impact or
constitutionality of either Article XIIIA or Article XIIIB, or the impact of
any such determinations upon State agencies or local governments, or upon
their ability to pay debt service on their obligations. Future initiative or
legislative changes in laws or the California Constitution may also affect the
ability of the State or local issuers to repay their obligations.
Under the California Constitution, debt service on outstanding general
obligation bonds is the second charge to the General Fund after support of the
public school system and public institutions of higher education. Total
outstanding general obligation bond and lease purchase debt of the State
increased from $9.4 billion at June 30, 1987 to $23.5 billion at June 30,
1994. In FY 1993-94, debt service on general obligation bonds and lease
purchase debt was approximately 5.2% of General Fund revenues.
The principal sources of General Fund revenues in 1993-94 were the California
personal income tax (44% of total revenues), the sales tax (35%), bank and
corporation taxes (12%), and the gross premium tax on insurance (3%).
California maintains a Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties (the "
Economic Uncertainties Fund" ), derived from General Fund revenues, as a
reserve to meet cash needs of the General Fund.
Throughout the 1980s, State spending increased rapidly as the State population
and economy also grew rapidly, including increased spending for many
assistance programs to local governments, which were constrained by
Proposition 13 and other laws. The largest State program is assistance to
local public school districts. In 1988, an initiative (Proposition 98) was
enacted which (subject to suspension by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature
and the Governor) guarantees local school districts and community college
districts a minimum share of State General Fund revenues (currently about
33%).
Since the start of 1990-91 Fiscal Year, the State has faced adverse economic,
fiscal and budget conditions. The economic recession seriously affected State
tax revenues. It also caused increased expenditures for health and welfare
programs. The State is also facing a structural imbalance in its budget with
the largest programs supported by the General Fund (education, health, welfare
and corrections) growing at rates significantly higher than the growth rates
for the principal revenue sources of the General Fund. These structural
concerns will be exacerbated in coming years by the expected need to
substantially increase capital and operating funds for corrections as a result
of a "Three Strikes" law enacted in 1994.
As a result of these factors, among others, from the late 1980's until
1992-1993, the State had a period of nearly chronic budget imbalance, with
expenditures exceeding revenues in four out of six years, and the State
accumulated and sustained a budget deficit in the budget reserve, the Special
Fund for Economic Uncertainties ("SFEU" ) approaching $2.8 billion at
its peak at June 30, 1993. Starting in the 1990-91 Fiscal Year and for each
year thereafter, each budget required multibillion dollar actions to bring
projected revenues and expenditures into balance and to close large "
budget gaps" which were identified. The Legislature and Governor
eventually agreed on a number of different steps to produce Budget Acts in the
years 1991-92 to 1994-95, including: significant cuts in health and welfare
program expenditures; transfers of program responsibilities and funding from
the State to local governments, coupled with some reduction in mandates on
local government; transfer of about $3.6 billion in annual local property tax
revenues from cities, counties, redevelopment agencies and some other
districts to local school districts, thereby reducing State funding for
schools; reduction in growth of support for higher education programs, coupled
with increases in student fees; revenue increases (particularly in the 1992-92
Fiscal Year budget), most of which were for a short duration; increased
reliance on aid from the federal government to offset the costs of
incarcerating, educating and providing health and welfare services to
undocumented aliens (although these efforts have produced much less federal
aid than the State Administration has requested) and various on-time
adjustments and accounting changes.
Despite these budget actions, the effects of the recession led to large,
unanticipated deficits in the SFEU, as compared to projected positive
balances. By the start of the 1993-94 Fiscal Year, the accumulated deficit was
so large (almost $2.8 billion) that it was impractical to budget to retire it
in one year, so a two-year program was implemented, using the issuance of
revenue anticipation warrants to carry a portion of the deficit over the end
of the fiscal year. When the economy failed to recover sufficiently in
1993-94, a second two-year plan was implemented in 1994-95, to carry the final
retirement of the deficit into 1995-96.
The combination of stringent budget actions cutting State expenditures, and
the turnaround of the economy by late 1993, finally led to the restoration of
positive financial results. While General Fund revenues and expenditures were
essentially equal in FY 1992-93 (following two years of excess expenditures
over revenues), the General Fund had positive operating results in FY 1993-94
and 1994-95, which have reduced the accumulated budget deficit to around $600
million as of June 30, 1995.
A consequence of the accumulated budget deficits in the early 1990's, together
with other factors such as disbursement of funds to local school districts
"borrowed" from future fiscal years and hence not shown in the annual
budget, was to significantly reduce the State's cash resources available to
pay its ongoing obligations. When the Legislature and the Governor failed to
adopt a budget for the 1992-93 Fiscal Year by July 1, 1992, which would have
allowed the State to carry out its normal annual cash flow borrowing to
replenish its cash reserves, the State Controller was forced to issue
registered warrants ("IOUs" ) to pay a variety of obligations
representing prior years' or continuing appropriations, and mandates from
court orders. Available funds were used to make constitutionally-mandated
payments, such as debt service on bonds and warrants. Between July 1 and
September 4, 1992 the State Controller issued a total of approximately $3.8
billion of registered warrants. After that date, all remaining outstanding
registered warrants (about $2.9 billion) were called for redemptions from
proceeds of the issuance of 1992 Interim Notes after the budget was adopted.
The State's cash condition became so serious in late spring of 1992 that the
State Controller was required to issue revenue anticipation warrants maturing
in the following fiscal year in order to pay the State's continuing
obligations. The State was forced to rely increasingly on external debt
markets to meet its cash needs, as a succession of notes and warrants (both
forms of short-term cash flow financing) were issued in the period from June
1992 to July 1994, often needed to pay previously-maturing notes or warrants.
These borrowings were used also in part to spread out the repayment of the
accumulated budget deficit over the end of a fiscal year.
The State issued $7.0 billion of short-term debt in July, 1994 to meet its
cash flow needs and to finance the deferral of part of the accumulated budget
deficit to the 1995-96 fiscal year. In order to assure repayment of the $4
billion, 22-month part of this borrowing, the State enacted legislation (the
"Trigger Law" ) which can lead to automatic, across-the-board cuts in
General Fund expenditures in either the 1994-95 or 1995-96 fiscal years if
cash flow projections made at certain times during those years show
deterioration from the projections made in July 1994 when the borrowings were
made. On November 15, 1994, the State Controller as part of the Trigger Law
reported that the cash position of the General Fund on June 30, 1995 would be
about $580 million better than earlier projected, so no automatic budget
adjustments were required in 1994-95. The Controller's report showed that loss
of federal funds was offset by higher revenues, lower expenditures, and
certain other increases in cash resources.
For the first time in four years, the State entered the 1995-96 fiscal year
with strengthening revenues based on an improving economy. The major feature
of the Governor's proposed Budget, a 15% phased tax cut, was rejected by the
Legislature.
The 1995-96 Budget Act was signed by the Governor on August 3, 1995, 34 days
after the start of the fiscal year. The Budget Act projects General Fund
revenues and transfers of $44.1 billion. Expenditures are budgeted at $43.4
billion. The Department of Finance projects that, after repaying the last of
the carryover budget deficit, there will be positive balance of less than $30
million in the budget reserve, the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties, at
June 30, 1996, providing no margin for adverse results during the year.
The Department of Finance projects cash flow borrowings in the 1995-96 Fiscal
Year will be the smallest in many years, comprising about $2 billion of notes
to be issued in April, 1996, and maturing by June 30, 1996. With full payment
of $4 billion of revenue anticipation warrants on April 25, 1996, the
Department sees no further need for borrowing over the end of the fiscal year.
The Department projects that available cash resources to pay State obligations
will be almost $2 billion at June 30, 1996. This "cushion" will be
re-examined by the State Controller on October 15, 1995, in the third step in
the Budget Adjustment Law process. If the Controller believes the available
cash resources on June 30, 1996 will, in fact, be zero or less, her report
would start a process which could lead to automatic budget cuts starting in
December, 1995.
The principal features of the 1995-96 Budget Act, in addition to those noted
above, are additional cuts in health and welfare expenditures (some of which
are subject to approvals or waivers by the federal government); assumed
further federal aid for illegal immigrant costs; and an increase in per-pupil
funding for public schools and community colleges, the first such significant
increase in four years.
State general obligation bonds ratings were reduced in July, 1994 to
"A1" by Moody's and "A" by S&P. Both of these ratings were reduced
from "AAA" levels which the State held until late 1991. There can be
no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the future. It should be
noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local California
issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the
State of California, and that there is no obligation on the part of the State
to make payment on such local obligations in the event of default.
The State is involved in certain legal proceedings (described in the State's
recent financial statements) that, if decided against the State, may require
the State to make significant future expenditures or may substantially impair
revenues. Trial courts have recently entered tentative decisions or
injunctions which would overturn several parts of the State's recent budget
compromises. The matters covered by these lawsuits include a deferral of
payments by the State to the Public Employees Retirement System, reductions in
welfare payments, and the use of certain cigarette tax funds for health costs.
All of these cases are subject to further proceedings and appeals, and if the
State eventually loses, the final remedies may not have to be implemented in
one year.
There are a number of State agencies, instrumentalities and political
subdivisions of the State that issue Municipal Obligations, some of which may
be conduit revenue obligations payable from payments from private borrowers.
These entities are subject to various economic risks and uncertainties, and
the credit quality of the securities issued by them may vary considerably from
the credit quality of the obligations backed by the full faith and credit of
the State.
Property tax revenues received by local governments declined more than 50%
following passage of Proposition 13. Subsequently, the California Legislature
enacted measures to provide for the redistribution of the State's General Fund
surplus to local agencies, the reallocation of certain State revenues to local
agencies and the assumption of certain governmental functions by the State to
assist municipal issuers to raise revenues. Total local assistance from the
State's General Fund was budgeted at approximately 75% of General Fund
expenditures in recent years, including the effect of implementing reductions
in certain aid programs. To reduce State General Fund support for school
districts, the 1992-93 and 1993-94 Budget Acts caused local governments to
transfer $3.9 billion of property tax revenues to school districts,
representing loss of the post-Proposition 13 "bailout" aid. The
largest share of these transfers came from counties, and the balance from
cities, special districts and redevelopment agencies. In order to make up this
shortfall, the Legislature proposed and voters approved in 1993 dedicating
0.5% of the sales tax to counties and cities for public safety purposes. In
addition, the Legislature has changed laws to relieve local governments of
certain mandates, allowing them to reduce costs.
To the extent the State should be constrained by its Article XIII
appropriations limit, or its obligation to conform to Proposition 98, or other
fiscal considerations, the absolute level, or the rate of growth, of State
assistance to local governments may be further reduced. Any such reductions in
State aid could compound the serious fiscal constraints already experienced by
many local governments, particularly counties. At lease one rural county
(Butte) publicly announced that it might enter bankruptcy proceedings in
August 1990, although such plans were put off after the Governor approved
legislation to provide additional funds for the county. Other counties have
also indicated that their budgetary condition is extremely grave. The Richmond
Unified School District (Contra Costa County) entered bankruptcy proceedings
in May 1991 but the proceedings have been dismissed. Los Angeles County, the
largest in the State, has reported severe fiscal problems, leading to a
nominal $1.2 billion deficit in its $11 billion budget for the 1995-96 Fiscal
Year. To balance the budget, the county has imposed severe cuts in services,
particularly for health care. The Legislature is considering actions to help
alleviate the County's fiscal problems, but none were completed before August
15, 1995. As a result of its bankruptcy proceedings (discussed further below)
Orange County also has implemented stringent cuts in services and has laid off
workers.
California Municipal Obligations which are assessment bonds may be adversely
affected by a general decline in real estate values or a slowdown in real
estate sales activity. In many cases, such bonds are secured by land which is
undeveloped at the time of issuance but anticipated to be developed within a
few years after issuance. In the event of such reduction or slowdown, such
development may not occur or may be delayed, thereby increasing the risk of a
default on the bonds. Because the special assessments or taxes securing these
bonds are not the personal liability of the owners of the property assessed,
the lien on the property is the only security for the bonds. Moreover, in most
cases the issuer of these bonds is not required to make payments on the bonds
in the event of delinquency in the payment of assessments or taxes, except
from amounts, if any, in a reserve fund established for the bonds.
Certain California long-term lease obligations, though typically payable from
the general fund of the municipality, are subject to "abatement" in
the event the facility being leased is unavailable for beneficial use and
occupancy by the municipality during the term of the lease. Abatement is not a
default, and there may be no remedies available to the holders of the
certificates evidencing the lease obligation in the event abatement occurs.
The most common cases of abatement are failure to complete construction of the
facility before the end of the period during which lease payments have been
capitalized and uninsured casualty losses to the facility (e.g., due to
earthquake). In the event abatement occurs with respect to a lease obligation,
lease payments may be interrupted (if all available insurance proceeds and
reserves are exhausted) and the certificates may not be paid when due.
Several years ago the Richmond Unified School District (the "District"
) entered into a lease transaction in which certain existing properties of the
District were sold and leased back in order to obtain funds to cover operating
deficits. Following a fiscal crisis in which the District's finances were
taken over by a State receiver (including a brief period under bankruptcy
court protection), the District failed to make rental payments on this lease,
resulting in a lawsuit by the Trustee for the Certificate of Participation
holders, in which the State was a named defendant (on the grounds that it
controlled the District's finances). One of the defenses raised in answer to
this lawsuit was the invalidity of the original lease transaction. The trial
court has upheld the validity of the District's lease, and the case has been
settled. Any judgment in any future case against the position asserted by the
Trustee in the Richmond case may have adverse implications for lease
transactions of a similar nature by other California entities.
The repayment of industrial development securities secured by real property
may be affected by California laws limiting foreclosure rights of creditors.
Securities backed by health care and hospital revenues may be affected by
changes in State regulations governing cost reimbursements to health care
providers under Medi-Cal (the State's Medicaid program), including risks
related to the policy of awarding exclusive contracts to certain hospitals.
Limitations on ad valorem property taxes may particularly affect "tax
allocation" bonds issued by California redevelopment agencies. Such bonds
are secured solely by the increase in assessed valuation of a redevelopment
project area after the start of redevelopment activity. In the event that
assessed values in the redevelopment project decline (e.g., because of a major
natural disaster such as an earthquake), the tax increment revenue may be
insufficient to make principal and interest payments on these bonds. Both
Moody's and S&P suspended ratings on California tax allocation bonds after the
enactment of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB, and only resumed such ratings on a
selective basis.
Proposition 87, approved by California voters in 1988, requires that all
revenues produced by a tax rate increase go directly to the taxing entity
which increased such tax rate to repay that entity's general obligation
indebtedness. As a result, redevelopment agencies (which, typically, are the
Issuers of tax allocation securities) no longer receive an increase in tax
increment when taxes on property in the project area are increased to repay
voter-approved bonded indebtedness.
The effect of these various constitutional and statutory changes upon the
ability of California municipal securities issuers to pay interest and
principal on their obligations remains unclear. Furthermore, other measures
affecting the taxing or spending authority of California or its political
subdivisions may be approved or enacted in the future. Legislation has been or
may be introduced which would modify existing taxes or other revenue-raising
measures or which either would further limit or, alternatively, would increase
the abilities of state and local governments to impose new taxes or increase
existing taxes. It is not presently possible to determine the impact of any
such legislation on California Municipal Obligations in which the Fund may
invest, future allocations of state revenues to local governments or the
abilities of state or local governments to pay the interest on, or repay the
principal of, such California Municipal Obligations.
Substantially all of California is within an active geologic region subject to
major seismic activity. Northern California in 1989 and Southern California in
1994 experienced major earthquakes causing billions of dollars in damages. The
federal government provided more than $1.8 billion in aid for both
earthquakes, and neither event is expected to have any long-term negative
economic impact. Any California Municipal Obligation in the Portfolio could be
affected by an interruption of revenues because of damaged facilities, or,
consequently, income tax deductions for casualty losses or property tax
assessment reductions. Compensatory financial assistance could be constrained
by the inability of (i) an issuer to have obtained earthquake insurance
coverage at reasonable rates; (ii) an insurer to perform on its contracts of
insurance in the event of widespread losses; or (iii) the Federal or State
government to appropriate sufficient funds within their respective budget
limitations.
On January 17, 1994, a major earthquake with an estimated magnitude 6.8 on the
Richter scale struck the Los Angeles area, causing significant property damage
to public and private facilities, presently estimated at $15-20 billion. While
over $9.5 billion of federal aid, and a projected $1.9 billion of State aid,
plus insurance proceeds, will reimburse much of that loss, there were bill be
come ultimate loss of health and income in the region, in addition to costs of
the disruption caused by the event. Short-term economic projections are
generally neutral, as the infusion of aid will restore billions of dollars to
the local economy within a few months; already the local construction industry
has picked up. Although the earthquake will hinder recovery from the recession
in Southern California, already hard-hit, its long-term impact is not expected
to be material in the context of the overall wealth of the region. Almost five
years after the event, there are few remaining effects of the 1989 Loma Prieta
earthquake in northern California (which, however, caused less severe damage
than Northridge).
On December 7, 1994, Orange County, California (the "County" ),
together with its pooled investment fund (the "Pools" ) filed for
protection under Chapter 9 of the federal Bankruptcy Code, after reports that
the Pools had suffered significant market losses in its investments caused a
liquidity crisis for the Pools and the County. Approximately 180 other public
entities, most but not all located in the County, were also depositors in the
Pools. The County estimated the Pools' loss at about $1.64 billion, or 23%, of
its initial deposits of around $7.5 billion. Many of the entities which kept
moneys in the Pools, including the County, faced cash flow difficulties
because of the bankruptcy filing and may be required to reduce programs or
capital projects. Moody's and Standard & Poor's have suspended, reduced to
below investment grade levels, or placed on "Credit Watch" various
securities of the County and the entities participating in the Pools.
On May 2, 1995, the Bankruptcy Court approved a settlement agreement covering
claims of the other participating entities against the County and the Pools.
Most participants have received in cash 80% (90% for school districts) of
their Pools' investment; the balance is to be paid in the future. The County
succeeded in deferring, by consent, until June 30, 1996, the repayment of $800
million of short-term obligations due in July and August, 1995; these notes
are, however, considered to be in default by Moody's and S&P. On June 27,
1995, County voters turned down a proposal for a temporary 0.5% increase in
the local sales tax, making the County's fiscal recovery much harder.
The State of California has no obligation with respect to any obligations or
securities of the County or any of the other participating entities, although
under existing legal precedents, the State may be obligated to ensure that
school districts have sufficient funds to operate. All school districts were
able to meet their obligations in the 1994-95 Fiscal Year.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
California IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, special counsel to the Fund
for California tax matters, under existing California income and property tax
law applicable to individuals who are California residents:
(1)the California IM-IT Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation
and the income of the California IM-IT Trust will be treated as the income of
the Unitholders under the income tax laws of California;
(2)amounts treated as interest on the underlying Securities in the California
IM-IT Trust which are exempt from tax under California personal income tax and
property tax laws when received by the California IM-IT Trust will, under such
laws, retain their status as tax-exempt interest when distributed to
Unitholders. However, interest on the underlying Securities attributed to a
Unitholder which is a corporation subject to the California franchise tax laws
may be includable in its gross income for purposes of determining its
California franchise tax. Further, certain interest which is attributable to a
Unitholder subject to the California personal income tax and which is treated
as an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum
tax pursuant to Section 57(a)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 may also
be treated as an item of tax preference that must be taken into account in
computing such Unitholder's alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of
the California alternative minimum tax enacted by 1987 California Statutes,
chapter 1138. However, because of the provisions of the California
Constitution exempting the interest on bonds issued by the State of
California, or by local governments within the state, from taxes levied on
income, the application of the new California alternative minimum tax to
interest otherwise exempt from the California personal income tax in some
cases may be unclear;
(3)under California income tax law, each Unitholder in the California IM-IT
Trust will have a taxable event when the California IM-IT Trust disposes of a
Security (whether by sale, exchange, redemption, or payment at maturity) or
when the Unitholder redeems or sells Units. Because of the requirement that
tax cost basis be reduced to reflect amortization of bond premium, under some
circumstances a Unitholder may realize taxable gains when Units are sold or
redeemed for an amount equal to, or less than, their original cost. The total
cost of each Unit in the California IM-IT Trust to a Unitholder is allocated
among each of the Bond issues held in the California IM-IT Trust (in
accordance with the proportion of the California IM-IT Trust comprised by each
Bond issue) in order to determine his per Unit tax cost for each Bond issue;
and the tax cost reduction requirements relating to amortization of bond
premium will apply separately to the per Unit tax cost of each Bond issue.
Unitholders' bases in their units, and the bases for their fractional interest
in each Trust asset, may have to be adjusted for their pro rata share of
accrued interest received, if any, on Securities delivered after the
Unitholders' respective settlement dates;
(4)under the California personal property tax laws, bonds (including the
Securities in the California IM-IT Trust) or any interest therein is exempt
from such tax;
(5)any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the California IM-IT
Trust with respect to the Securities which represent maturing interest on
defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be exempt from California
personal income tax if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so exempt if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations; and
(6)under Section 17280(b)(2) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code,
interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry Units of
the California IM-IT Trust is not deductible for the purposes of the
California personal income tax. While there presently is no California
authority interpreting this provision, Section 17280(b)(2) directs the
California Franchise Tax Board to prescribe regulations determining the proper
allocation and apportionment of interest costs for this purpose. The Franchise
Tax Board has not yet proposed or prescribed such regulations. In interpreting
the generally similar Federal provision, the Internal Revenue Service has
taken the position that such indebtedness need not be directly traceable to
the purchase or carrying of Units (although the Service has not contended that
a deduction for interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve a
personal residence or to purchase goods or services for personal consumption
will be disallowed). In the absence of conflicting regulations or other
California authority, the California Franchise Tax Board generally has
interpreted California statutory tax provisions in accord with Internal
Revenue Service interpretations of similar Federal provisions.
At the respective times of issuance of the Securities, opinions relating to
the validity thereof and to the exemption of interest thereon from Federal
income tax and California personal income tax are rendered by bond counsel to
the respective issuing authorities. Except in certain instances in which
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe acted as bond counsel to issuers of Securities,
and as such made a review of proceedings relating to the issuance of certain
Securities at the time of their issuance, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has
not made any special review for the California IM-IT Trust of the proceedings
relating to the issuance of the Securities or of the basis for such opinions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................. $ 55.20 $ 55.20
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>.............................. $ 2.10 $ 1.67
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit...................... -- --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 53.10 $ 53.53
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 53.10 $ 53.53
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively......................................... $ 4.43 $ 26.77
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit...................... $ .14748 $ .14868
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>... 5.31% 5.35%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>.................................... 5.34% 5.38%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996).......................... $ 5.46
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (July 1996)..................... $ 14.42
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................ $ 4.43 $ 26.77
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>...... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the
California IM-IT Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--January and July
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
January and July commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.38
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued" Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated Annual
Interest Income per Unit will be increased to $55.58. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $2.48 and $2.05 under the
monthly and semi-annual distribution plans, respectively; and Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."
<F2>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F4>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
CALIFORNIA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST SERIES 151
(IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
California
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Maturity Date of Redemption IM-IT
Principal<F1> either Bonds Deposited or Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 230,000 State Public Works Board of the State of California, Lease
Revenue Bonds (Department of Corrections) Series 1993B
(California State Prison-Fresno County, Coalinga) MBIA Insured 2003 @ 102
#5.375% Due 12/1/2019 .......................................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. $ 215,002
500,000 Calipatria Unified School District, Imperial County,
California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1996A (AMBAC 2006 @ 102
Indemnity Insured)** #5.80% Due 8/1/2020 ..................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 496,035
220,000 Oak Grove School District (County of Santa Clara, California
General Obligation Bonds, Election of 1995, Series 1996A (MBIA 2003 @ 101
Insured) #5.00% Due 8/1/2020 ................................. AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 194,390
500,000 The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles,
California (Bunker Hill Redevelopment Project) Tax Allocation 2003 @ 102
Refunding Bonds, Series H (FSA Insured) #5.625% Due 12/1/2023 AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 480,530
100,000 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (California) North Area
Local Project, Capital Assessment District No. 2 Bonds, Series 2005 @ 102
1995 (FGIC Insured) #5.375% Due 10/1/2025 .................... AAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 93,202
500,000 Jefferson Union High School District (County of San Mateo,
California) General Obligation Bonds, Election 1995, Series A 2004 @ 102
(FSA Insured)** 5.95% Due 8/1/2026 ........................... AAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 503,115
395,000 Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Lease
Revenue Bonds (Oakland Administration Buildings) Series 1996 2006 @ 102
(AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.75% Due 8/1/2026 ................ AAA 2022 @ 100 S.F. 385,903
500,000 County of Madera, California, Certificates of Participation
(Valley Children's Hospital Project) Series 1995 (MBIA Insured) 2005 @ 102
#5.75% Due 3/15/2028 .......................................... AAA 2024 @ 100 S.F. 490,545
$ 2,945,000 $ 2,858,722
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
FLORIDA IM-IT TRUST
General. The Florida IM-IT Trust consists of 9 issues of Securities. One of
the Bonds in the Florida IM-IT Trust is a general obligation of the
governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing power thereof. The
remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Florida IM-IT Trust) as follows: Certificates of Participation, 1 (17%);
Tax District, 1 (17%); General Obligations, 1 (16%); General Purpose, 1 (15%);
Water and Sewer, 1 (9%); Health Care, 1 (8%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (8%);
Waste Disposal, 1 (8%) and Public Building, 1 (2%). No Bond issue has received
a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. Florida's economy has in the past been highly dependent on the
construction industry and construction related manufacturing. This dependency
has declined in recent years and continues to do so as a result of continued
diversification of the State's economy. For example, in 1980 total contract
construction employment as a share of total non-farm employment was just over
seven percent and in 1993 the share had edged downward to five percent. This
trend is expected to continue as Florida's economy continues to diversify.
Florida, nevertheless, has a dynamic construction industry with single and
multi-family housing starts accounting for 8.5% of total U.S. housing starts
in 1993 while the State's population is 5.3% of the U.S. total population.
Florida's housing starts since 1980 have represented an average of 11.0% of
the U.S.'s total annual starts, and since 1980 total housing starts have
averaged 156,450 a year.
A driving force behind the State's construction industry has been the
State's rapid rate of population growth. Although the State currently is the
fourth most populous state, its annual population growth is now projected to
decline as the number of people moving into the State is expected to hover
near the mid 250,000 range annually throughout the 1990's. This population
trend should provide fuel for business and home builders to keep construction
activity lively in Florida for some time to come. However, other factors do
influence the level of construction in the State. For example, federal tax
reform in 1986 and other changes to the federal income tax code have
eliminated tax deductions for owners of more than two residential real estate
properties and have lengthened depreciation schedules on investment and
commercial properties. Economic growth and existing supplies of homes also
contribute to the level of construction activity in the State.
Since 1980, the State's job creation rate is almost twice the rate for the
nation as a whole, and its growth rate in new non-agricultural jobs is the
fastest of the must populous states, second only to California in the absolute
number of new jobs created. Contributing to the State's rapid rate of growth
in employment and income is international trade. Since 1980, the State's
unemployment rate has generally been below that of the U.S. In recent years,
however, as the State's economic growth has slowed from its previous high the
State's unemployment rate has tracked above the national average. The average
rate in Florida since 1980 has been 6.5% while the national average is 7.1%.
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Florida Department of Labor
and Employment Security, and the Florida Consensus Economic Estimating
Conference (together, the "Organization" ), the State's unemployment
rate was 8.2% during 1992. As of January 1994, the Organization estimates that
the unemployment rate will be 6.1% for 1994-95 and 6.1% in 1995-96.
The rate of job creation in Florida's manufacturing sector has exceeded that
of the U.S. From the beginning of 1980 through 1993, the State added over
50,000 new manufacturing jobs, an 11.7% increase. During the same period,
national manufacturing employment declined ten out of the fourteen years, for
a loss of 2,977,000 jobs.
Total non-farm employment in Florida is expected to increase 3.6% in 1994-95
and rise 3.3% in 1995-96. Trade and services, the two largest sources of
employment in the State, account for more than half of the total non-farm
employment. Employment in the service sectors should experience an increase of
5.4% in 1994-95 while growing 4.7% in 1995-96. Trade is expected to expand
3.1% in 1995 and 3.2% in 1996. The service sector is now the State's largest
employment category.
Tourism is one of the State's most important industries. Approximately 41.1
million tourists visited the State in 1993, as reported by the Florida
Department of Commerce. In terms of business activities and State tax
revenues, tourists in Florida in 1993 represented an estimated 4.5 million
additional residents. Visitors to the State tend to arrive equally by air and
car. The State's tourism industry over the years has become more
sophisticated, attracting visitors year-round and, to a degree, reducing its
seasonality. Tourist arrivals are expected to increase by 5.0% this year, and
3.4% next year. Tourist arrivals to Florida by air are expected to increase by
9.2% this year and 2.9% next year, while arrivals by car are expected to rise
0.7% in 1994-95 and 4.0% in 1995-96. By the end of the State's current fiscal
year, 42.1 million domestic and international tourists are expected to have
visited the State. In 1995-96 tourist arrivals should approximate 43.6 million.
The State's per capita personal income in 1993 of $20,857 was slightly above
the national average of $20,817 and significantly ahead of that for the
southeast United States, which was $18,753. Real personal income in the State
is estimated to increase 4.5% in 1994-95 and 4.2% in 1995-96. By the end of
1995-96, real personal income per capita in the State is projected to average
4.5% higher than its 1993-94 level.
Because Florida has a proportionately greater retirement age population,
property income (dividends, interest, and rent) and transfer payments (Social
Security and pension benefits, among other sources of income) are relatively
more important sources of income. For example, Florida's total wages and
salaries and other labor income in 1993 was 62% of total personal income,
while a similar figure for the nation was 72%. Transfer payments are typically
less sensitive to the business cycle than employment income and, therefore,
act as stabilizing forces in weak economic periods.
Estimated fiscal year 1994-95 General Revenue plus Working Capital and Budget
Stabilization funds available to the State total $14,624.4 million, a 5.7%
increase over 1993-94. This reflects a transfer of $159.0 million in
non-recurring revenue due to Hurricane Andrew, to a hurricane relief trust
fund. Of the total General Revenue plus Working Capital and Budget
Stabilization funds available to the State, $13,858.4 million of that is
Estimated Revenues (excluding the Hurricane Andrew impact), which represents
an increase of 7.9% over the previous year's Estimated Revenues. With
effective General Revenues plus Working Capital Fund and Budget Stabilization
appropriations at $14,311.1 million, unencumbered reserves at the end of
1994-95 are estimated at $313.3 million. Estimated fiscal year 1995-96 General
Revenue plus Working Capital and Budget Stabilization funds available total
$15,145.9 million, a 3.6% increase over 1994-95. The $14,647.2 million in
Estimated Revenues represents an increase of 5.7% over the previous year's
Estimated Revenues.
In fiscal year 1993-94, approximately 66% of the State's total direct
revenue to its three operating funds was derived from State taxes and fees,
with Federal grants and other special revenue accounting for the balance.
State sales and use tax, corporate income tax, intangible personal property
tax and beverage tax amounted to 66%, 8%, 4% and 4%, respectively, of total
General Revenue Funds available during fiscal 1993-94. In that same year,
expenditures for education, health and welfare, and public safety amounted to
approximately 49%, 32%, and 12%, respectively, of total expenditures from the
General Revenue Fund.
The State's sales and use tax (6%) currently accounts for the State's
single largest source of tax receipts. Sightly less than 10% of the State's
sales and use tax is designated for local governments and is distributed to
the respective counties in which collected for use by the counties, and the
municipalities therein. In addition to this distribution, local governments
may assess (by referendum) a 0.5% or a 1.0% discretionary sales surtax within
their county. Proceeds from this local option sales tax are earmarked for
funding local infrastructure programs and acquiring land for public recreation
or conservation or protection of natural resources as provided under
applicable Florida law. Certain charter counties have other additional taxing
powers, and non-consolidated counties with a population in excess of 800,000
may levy a local option sales tax to fund indigent health care. It alone
cannot exceed 0.5% and when combined with the infrastructure surtax cannot
exceed 1.0%. For the fiscal year ended June 30,1994, sales and use tax
receipts (exclusive of the tax on gasoline and special fuels) totalled
$10,012.5 million, an increase of 6.9% over fiscal year 1992-93.
The second largest source of State tax receipts is the tax on motor fuels.
However, these revenues are almost entirely dedicated trust funds for specific
purposes and are not included in the State's General Revenue Fund.
The State imposes an alcoholic beverage wholesale tax (excise tax) on beer,
wine, and liquor. This tax is one of the State's major tax sources, with
revenues totalling $439.8 million in fiscal year ending June 30,1994.
Alcoholic beverage tax receipts decreased about 1.0% from the previous year's
total. The revenues collected from this tax are deposited into the State's
General Revenue Fund.
The State imposes a corporate income tax. All receipts of the corporate
income tax are credited to the General Revenue Fund. For the fiscal year ended
June 30,1994, receipts from this source were $1,047.4 million, an increase of
23.7% from fiscal year 1992-93.
The State imposes a documentary stamp tax on deeds and other documents
relating to realty, corporate shares, bonds, certificates of indebtedness,
promissory notes, wage assignments, and retail charge accounts. The
documentary stamp tax collections totalled $775.0 million during fiscal year
1993-94, a 21.3% increase from the previous fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal
year 1992-93, 71.29% of these taxes is to be deposited to the General Revenue
Fund.
The State imposes a gross receipts tax on electric, natural gas, and
telecommunications services. All gross receipts utilities tax collections are
credited to the State's Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service
Trust Fund. In fiscal year 1993-94, this amounted to $459.4 million.
The State imposes an intangible personal property tax on stocks, bonds,
including bonds secured by liens in Florida real property, notes, governmental
leaseholds, and certain other intangibles not secured by a lien on Florida
real property. The annual rate of tax is 2 mils. The State also imposes a
non-recurring 2 mil tax on mortgages and other obligations secured by liens on
Florida real property. In fiscal year 1993-94, total intangible personal
property tax collections were $836.0 million, a 6.7% increase over the prior
year. Of the tax proceeds, 66.5% is distributed to the General Revenue Fund.
The State began its own lottery in 1988. State law requires that lottery
revenues be distributed 50.0% to the public in prizes, 38.0% for use in
enhancing education, and the balance, 12.0%, for costs of administering the
lottery. Fiscal year 1993-94 lottery ticket sales totalled $2.15 billion,
providing education with approximately $816.2 million.
The State's severance tax taxes oil, gas and sulphur production, as well as
the severance of phosphate rock and other solid minerals. Total collections
from severance taxes total $54.8 million during fiscal year 1993-94, down
15.0% from the previous year. Currently 60% of this amount is transferred to
the General Revenue Fund.
At the end of fiscal 1993, approximately $5.61 billion in principal amount of
debt secured by the full faith and credit of the State was outstanding. In
addition, since July 1, 1993, the State issued about $1.36 billion in
principal amount of full faith and credit bonds.
The State Constitution and statutes mandate that the State budget, as a whole,
and each separate fund within the State budget, be kept in balance from
currently available revenues each fiscal year. If the Governor or Comptroller
believe a deficit will occur in any State fund, by statute, he must certify
his opinion to the Administrative Commission, which then is authorized to
reduce all State agency budgets and releases by a sufficient amount to prevent
a deficit in any fund. Additionally, the State Constitution prohibits issuance
of State obligations to fund State operations.
Currently under litigation are several issues relating to State actions or
State taxes that put at risk substantial amounts of General Revenue Fund
monies. Accordingly, there is no assurance that any of such matters,
individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse affect on
Florida's financial position.
Florida law provides preferential tax treatment to insurers who maintain a
home office in the State. Certain insurers challenged the constitutionality of
this tax preference and sought a refund of taxes paid. Recently, the State
Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State. This case and others, along with
pending refund claims, total about $150 million.
Previously, the State imposed a $295 fee on the issuance of certificates of
title for motor vehicles previously titled outside the State. Plaintiffs sued
the State alleging that this fee violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S.
Constitution. The Circuit Court in which the case was filed granted summary
judgment for the plaintiffs, enjoined further collection of the impact fee and
ordered refunds to all those who have paid the fee since the collection of the
fee went into effect. In the State's appeal of the lower court's decision,
the Florida Supreme Court ruled that this fee was unconstitutional under the
Commerce Clause. Thus, the Supreme Court approved the lower court's order
enjoining further collection of the fee and requiring refund of the previously
collected fees. The refund exposure of the State has been estimated to be in
excess of $100 million.
Florida maintains a bond rating of Aa, AA and AA from Moody's Investors
Service, Standard & Poor's and Fitch, respectively, on the majority of its
general obligation bonds, although the rating of a particular series of
revenue bonds relates primarily to the project, facility, or other revenue
sources from which such series derives funds for repayment. While these
ratings and some of the information presented above indicate that Florida is
in satisfactory economic health, there can be no assurance that there will not
be a decline in economic conditions or that particular Municipal Obligations
purchased by the Fund will not be adversely affected by any such changes.
The sources for the information presented above include official statements
and financial statements of the State of Florida. While the Sponsor has not
independently verified this information, the Sponsor has no reason to believe
that the information is not correct in all material respects.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Florida IM-IT Trust units, see "Other Matters --Federal Tax Status" .
The Bonds were accompanied by opinions of Bond Counsel to the respective
issuers thereof to the effect that the Bonds were exempt from the Florida
intangibles tax. Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently
reviewed such opinions or examined the Bonds to be deposited in and held by
the Florida IM-IT Trust and have assumed the correctness as of the date of
deposit of the opinions of Bond Counsel.
"Non-Corporate Unitholder" means a Unitholder of the Florida Trust who
is an individual not subject to the Florida state income tax on corporations
under Chapter 220, Florida Statutes and "Corporate Unitholder" means a
Unitholder of the Florida Trust that is a corporation, bank or savings
association or other entity subject to Florida state income tax on
corporations or franchise tax imposed on banks or savings associations under
Chapter 220, Florida Statutes.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, counsel to the Sponsor, under existing
law:
For Florida state income tax purposes, the Florida IM-IT Trust will not be
subject to the Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida Statutes.
Because Florida does not impose an income tax on individuals, Non-Corporate
Unitholders residing in Florida will not be subject to any Florida income
taxation on income realized by the Florida IM-IT Trust. Any amounts paid to
the Florida IM-IT Trust or to Non-Corporate Unitholders under an insurance
policy issued to the Florida IM-IT Trust or the Sponsor which represent
maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will not be
subject to the Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida Statutes.
Corporate Unitholders with commercial domiciles in Florida will be subject to
Florida income or franchise taxation on income realized by the Florida IM-IT
Trust and on payments of interest pursuant to any insurance policy to the
extent such income constitutes "non business income" as defined by
Chapter 220 or is otherwise allocable to Florida under Chapter 220. Other
Corporate Unitholders will be subject to Florida income or franchise taxation
on income realized by the Florida IM-IT Trust (or on payments of interest
pursuant to any insurance policy) only to the extent that the income realized
does not constitute "non-business income" as defined by Chapter 220
and if such income is otherwise allocable to Florida under Chapter 220.
Units will be subject to Florida estate tax only if held by Florida residents.
However, the Florida estate tax is limited to the amount of the credit for
state death taxes provided for in Section 2011 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Neither the Bonds nor the Units will be subject to the Florida ad valorem
property tax, the Florida intangible personal property tax or the Florida
sales or use tax.
Chapman and Cutler has expressed no opinion with respect to taxation under any
other provision of Florida law. Ownership of the Units may result in
collateral Florida tax consequences to certain taxpayers. Prospective
investors should consult their tax advisors as to the applicability of any
such collateral consequences.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................. $ 54.17 $ 54.17
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>.............................. $ 2.03 $ 1.58
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit...................... -- --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 52.14 $ 52.59
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 52.14 $ 52.59
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively......................................... $ 4.35 $ 26.30
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit...................... $ .14483 $ .14607
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>... 5.21% 5.26%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>.................................... 5.25% 5.30%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996).......................... $ 5.36
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (July 1996)..................... $ 14.17
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................ $ 4.35 $ 26.30
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>...... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the
Florida IM-IT Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--January and July
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
January and July commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.29
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued" Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated Annual
Interest Income per Unit will be increased to $54.46. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $2.32 and $1.87 under the
monthly and semi-annual distribution plans, respectively; and Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."
<F2>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F4>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
FLORIDA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST SERIES 102
(IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Florida
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Maturity Date of Redemption IM-IT
Principal<F1> either Bonds Deposited or Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 Orange County, Florida, Tourist Development Tax Revenue 2004 @ 102
Bonds, Series 1994B (MBIA Insured) #5.75% Due 10/1/2019... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. $ 498,750
450,000 Lee County, Florida, Local Option Gas Tax Revenue Bonds, 2005 @ 102
Series 1995 (FGIC Insured) #5.75% Due 10/1/2020 .......... AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 448,875
250,000 South Broward Hospital District, Florida, Hospital
Refunding Revenue Bonds (MBIA Insured) #5.250% Due 2006 @ 102
5/1/2021.................................................... AAA 2012 @ 100 S.F. 231,633
510,000 The School Board of Brevard County, Florida, Certificates
of Participation, Series 1996B (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)** 2006 @ 102
#5.50% Due 7/1/2021 ....................................... AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 490,008
250,000 Sarasota County, Florida, Solid Waste System Revenue Bonds 2006 @ 102
(AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.50% Due 10/1/2021............ AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 239,730
50,000 Dade County, Florida, Professional Sports Franchise
Facilities, Tax Revenue Capital Appreciation Bonds, Series
1995 (MBIA Insured) #0.00% Due 10/1/2023 ............... AAA 10,429 <F6>
500,000 Florida State Board of Education, Capital Outlay Public
Education General Obligation Bonds, Series C (MBIA Insured) 2005 @ 101
#5.60% Due 6/1/2025 ...................................... AAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 485,060
250,000 City of Atlantic Beach, Florida, Utilities System Revenue 2006 @ 102
Bonds, Series 1996 (MBIA Insured)** #5.50% Due 10/1/2025 . AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 239,020
270,000 St. John's County, Florida, Water and Sewer Revenue 2006 @ 102
Refunding Bonds (MBIA Insured) #5.50% Due 6/1/2026........ AAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 258,009
$ 3,030,000 $ 2,901,514
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST
General. The Michigan IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities. Four of
the Bonds in the Michigan IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Michigan IM-IT Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 4 (42%); Airport,
1 (16%); Health Care, 1 (16%); Other Care, 1 (16%) and Higher Education, 1
(10%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. Investors should be aware that the economy of the State of
Michigan has, in the past, proven to be cyclical, due primarily to the fact
that the leading sector of the State's economy is the manufacturing of durable
goods. While the State's efforts to diversify its economy have proven
successful, as reflected by the fact that the share of employment in the State
in the durable goods sector has fallen from 33.1 percent in 1960 to 17.9
percent in 1990, durable goods manufacturing still represents a sizable
portion of the State's economy. As a result, any substantial national economic
downturn is likely to have an adverse effect on the economy of the State and
on the revenues of the State and some of its local governmental units.
In July 1995, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. raised the State's general
obligation bond rating to "Aa" . In October 1989, Standard & Poor's
raised its rating on the State's general obligation bonds to "AA" .
The State's economy could continue to be affected by changes in the auto
industry, notably consolidation and plant closings resulting from competitive
pressures and over-capacity. Such actions could adversely affect State
revenues and the financial impact on the local units of government in the
areas in which plants are closed could be more severe.
In recent years, the State has reported its financial results in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. For the fiscal years ended
September 30, 1990 and 1991, the State reported negative year-end balances in
the General Fund/School Aid Fund of $310.4 million and $169.4 million,
respectively. The State ended each of the 1992, 1993 and 1994 fiscal years
with its General Fund/School Aid Fund in balance, after having made
substantial transfers to the Budget Stabilization Fund in 1993 and 1994. A
positive cash balance in the combined General Fund/School Aid Fund was
recorded at September 30, 1990. In the 1991 through 1993 fiscal years, the
State experienced deteriorating cash balances which necessitated short-term
borrowing and the deferral of certain scheduled cash payments. The State did
not borrow for cash flow purposes in 1994, but borrowed $500 million on March
9, 1995, which was repaid on September 29, 1995. On February 20, 1996, the
State borrowed $900 million for cash flow purposes in the current fiscal year,
with a maturity date of September 30, 1996. The State's Budget Stabilization
Fund received year-end transfers from the General Fund of $283 million in 1993
and $464 million in 1994, bringing the balance in the Budget Stabilization
Fund to $779 million at September 30, 1994.
The Michigan Constitution of 1963 limits the amount of total revenues of the
State raised from taxes and certain other sources to a level for each fiscal
year equal to a percentage of the State's personal income for the prior
calendar year. In the event that the State's total revenues exceeds the limit
by 1 percent or more, the Michigan Constitution of 1963 requires that the
excess be refunded to taxpayers.
On March 15, 1994, Michigan voters approved a school finance reform amendment
to the State's Constitution which, among other things, increased the State
sales tax rate from 4% to 6% and placed a cap on property assessment increases
for all property taxes. Concurrent legislation cut the State's income tax rate
from 4.6% to 4.4%, reduced some property taxes and altered local school
funding sources to a combination of property taxes and state revenues, some of
which is provided from other new or increased State taxes. The legislation
also contained other provisions that alter (and, in some cases, may reduce)
the revenues of local units of government, and tax increment bonds could be
particularly affected. While the ultimate impact of the constitutional
amendment and related legislation cannot yet be accurately predicted,
investors should be alert to the potential effect of such measures upon the
operations and revenues of Michigan local units of government.
In addition, the State Legislature recently adopted a package of state tax
cuts, including a phase out of the intangibles tax, an increase in exemption
amounts for personal income tax, and reductions in single business tax.
Although all or most of the Bonds in the Michigan IM-IT Trust are revenue
obligations or general obligations of local governments or authorities rather
than general obligations of the State of Michigan itself, there can be no
assurance that any financial difficulties the State may experience will not
adversely affect the market value or marketability of the Bonds or the ability
of the respective obligors to pay interest on or principal of the Bonds,
particularly in view of the dependency of local governments and other
authorities upon State aid and reimbursement programs and, in the case of
bonds issued by the State Building Authority, the dependency of the State
Building Authority on the receipt of rental payments from the State to meet
debt service requirements upon such bonds. In the 1991 fiscal year, the State
deferred certain scheduled cash payments to municipalities, school districts,
universities and community colleges. While such deferrals were made up at
specified later dates, similar future deferrals could have an adverse impact
on the cash position of some local governmental units. Additionally, the State
reduced revenue sharing payments to municipalities below that level provided
under formulas by $10.9 million in the 1991 fiscal year, up $34.4 million in
the 1992 fiscal year, $45.5 million in the 1993 fiscal year, $54.5 million in
the 1994 fiscal year, and $67.0 million (budgeted) in the 1995 fiscal year.
The Michigan IM-IT Trust may contain general obligation bonds of local units
of government pledging the full faith and credit of the local unit which are
payable from the levy of ad valorem taxes on taxable property within the
jurisdiction of the local unit. Such bonds issued prior to December 22, 1978,
or issued after December 22, 1978 with the approval of the electors of the
local unit, are payable from property taxes levied without limitation as to
rate or amount. With respect to bonds issued after December 22, 1978, and
which were not approved by the electors of the local unit, the tax levy of the
local unit for debt service purposes is subject to constitutional, statutory
and charter tax rate limitations. In addition, several major industrial
corporations have instituted challenges of their ad valorem property tax
assessments in a number of local municipal units in the State. If successful,
such challenges could have an adverse impact on the ad valorem tax bases of
such units which could adversely affect their ability to raise funds for
operation and debt service requirements.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Michigan IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
In the opinion of Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C., special counsel
to the Fund for Michigan tax matters, under existing Michigan law:
The Michigan IM-IT Trust and the owners of Units will be treated for purposes
of the Michigan income tax laws and the Single Business Tax in substantially
the same manner as they are for purposes of the Federal income tax laws, as
currently enacted. Accordingly, we have relied upon the opinion of Messrs.
Chapman and Cutler as to the applicability of Federal income tax under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to the Michigan IM-IT Trust and the Holders of
Units.
Under the income tax laws of the State of Michigan, the Michigan IM-IT Trust
is not an association taxable as a corporation; the income of the Michigan
IM-IT Trust will be treated as the income of the Unitholders and be deemed to
have been received by them when received by the Michigan IM-IT Trust. Interest
on the underlying Bonds which is exempt from tax under these laws when
received by Michigan IM-IT Trust will retain its status as tax exempt interest
to the Unitholders.
For purposes of the foregoing Michigan tax laws, each Unitholder will be
considered to have received his pro rata share of Bond interest when it is
received by the Michigan IM-IT Trust, and each Unitholder will have a taxable
event when the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes of a Bond (whether by sale,
exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or when the Unitholder redeems or
sells his Certificate to the extent the transaction constitutes a taxable
event for Federal income tax purposes. The tax cost of each unit to a
Unitholder will be established and allocated for purposes of these Michigan
tax laws in the same manner as such cost is established and allocated for
Federal income tax purposes.
Under the Michigan Intangibles Tax, the Michigan IM-IT Trust is not taxable
and the pro rata ownership of the underlying Bonds, as well as the interest
thereon, will be exempt to the Unitholders to the extent the Michigan IM-IT
Trust consists of obligations of the State of Michigan or its political
subdivisions or municipalities, or of obligations of possessions of the United
States. The Intangibles Tax is being phased out, with reductions of
twenty-five percent (25%) in 1994 and 1995, fifty percent (50%) in 1996, and
seventy-five percent (75%) in 1997, with total repeal effective January 1,
1998.
The Michigan Single Business Tax replaced the tax on corporate and financial
institution income under the Michigan Income Tax, and the Intangible Tax with
respect to those intangibles of persons subject to the Single Business Tax the
income from which would be considered in computing the Single Business Tax.
Persons are subject to the Single Business Tax only if they are engaged in
"business activity" , as defined in the Act. Under the Single Business
Tax, both interest received by the Michigan IM-IT Trust on the underlying
Bonds and any amount distributed from the Michigan IM-IT Trust to a
Unitholder, if not included in determining taxable income for Federal income
tax purposes, is also not included in the adjusted tax base upon which the
Single Business Tax is computed, of either the Michigan IM-IT Trust or the
Unitholders. If the Michigan IM-IT Trust or the Unitholders have a taxable
event for Federal income tax purposes when the Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes
of a Bond (whether by sale, exchange, redemption or payment at maturity) or
the Unitholder redeems or sells his Certificate, an amount equal to any gain
realized from such taxable event which was included in the computation of
taxable income for Federal income tax purposes (plus an amount equal to any
capital gain of an individual realized in connection with such event but
excluded in computing that individual's Federal taxable income) will be
included in the tax base against which, after allocation, apportionment and
other adjustments, the Single Business Tax is computed. The tax base will be
reduced by an amount equal to any capital loss realized from such a taxable
event, whether or not the capital loss was deducted in computing Federal
taxable income in the year the loss occurred. Unitholders should consult their
tax advisor as to their status under Michigan law.
Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy issued to the Trustee of the
Trust, or paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of Bonds, which,
when received by the Unitholders, represent maturing interest on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee, will be excludable from the Michigan income
tax laws and the Single Business Tax if, and to the same extent as, such
interest would have been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted
obligations. While treatment under the Michigan Intangibles Tax is not
premised upon the characterization of such proceeds under the Internal Revenue
Code, the Michigan Department of Treasury should adopt the same approach as
under the Michigan income tax laws and the Single Business Tax.
As the Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminates the capital gain deduction for tax
years beginning after December 31, 1986, the federal adjusted gross income,
the computation base for the Michigan Income Tax, of a Unitholder will be
increased accordingly to the extent such capital gains are realized when the
Michigan IM-IT Trust disposes of a Bond or when the Unitholder redeems or
sells a Unit, to the extent such transaction constitutes a taxable event for
Federal income tax purposes.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 55.26 $ 55.26
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>.......................... $ 2.42 $ 1.96
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit.................. -- --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 52.84 $ 53.30
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 52.84 $ 53.30
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively..................................... $ 4.40 $ 26.65
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.................. $ .14677 $ .14805
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F2><F3><F4>... 5.28% 5.33%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F2><F3><F4>................................ 5.34% 5.39%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996)...................... $ 5.43
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (July 1996)................. $ 14.36
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F4>............................ $ 4.40 $ 26.65
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee........... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the
Michigan IM-IT Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--January and July
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
January and July commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F2>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F4>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
MICHIGAN INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST SERIES 136
(IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Michigan
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Maturity Date of either Redemption IM-IT
Principal<F1> Bonds Deposited or Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 Shelby Public School, County of Oceana, State of Michigan,
1995 School Building and Site Bonds (General 2004 @ 101
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) MBIA Insured #5.625% Due 5/1/2021.... AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. $ 480,835
500,000 Charter County of Wayne, Michigan, Airport Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport) Subordinate 2003 @ 102
Lien, Series 1993C (MBIA Insured) #5.25% Due 12/1/2021......... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 457,320
500,000 County of Jackson Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue
Refunding Bonds (W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital, Jackson, 2003 @ 102
Michigan) Series 1993A (FGIC Insured) #5.25% Due 6/1/2023 ..... AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 455,595
145,000 Byron Center Public Schools, County of Kent, State of Michigan,
1995 School Building and Site and Refunding Bonds (General 2005 @ 101
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) MBIA Insured #5.875% Due 5/1/2024.... AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 144,859
500,000 Economic Development Corporation of the City of Farmington
Hills, Michigan, Revenue Bonds (Botsford Continuing Care
Corporation Project) Series 1995A (MBIA Insured) #5.75% Due 2005 @ 102
2/15/2025 ....................................................... AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 490,870
250,000 Eaton Rapids Public Schools, Counties of Eaton and Ingham, State
of Michigan, 1995 School Building and Site Bonds (General 2004 @ 101
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) MBIA Insured #5.625% Due 5/1/2025.... AAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 241,105
400,000 Oxford Area Community Schools, Counties of Oakland and Lapeer,
State of Michigan, 1996 School Building and Site Bonds (General 2006 @ 101
Obligation-Unlimited Tax) FGIC Insured #5.40% Due 5/1/2025 ..... AAA 2022 @ 100 S.F. 373,328
305,000 Board of Trustees of Oakland University, Michigan, General 2005 @ 102
Revenue Bonds, Series 1995 (MBIA Insured) #5.75% Due 5/15/2026 AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 300,398
$ 3,100,000 $ 2,944,310
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
MINNESOTA IM-IT TRUST
General. The Minnesota IM-IT Trust consists of 10 issues of Securities. Five
of the Bonds in the Minnesota IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Minnesota IM-IT Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 5 (49%); Health
Care, 4 (34%); and Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue, 1 (17%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. In the early 1980's the State of Minnesota experienced financial
difficulties due to a downturn in the State's economy resulting from the
national recession. As a consequence, the State's revenues were significantly
lower than anticipated in the July 1, 1979 to June 30, 1981 biennium and the
July 1, 1981 to June 30, 1983 biennium.
In response to revenue shortfalls, the legislature broadened and increased the
State sales tax, increased income taxes (by increasing rates and eliminating
deductions) and reduced appropriations and deferred payment of State aid,
including appropriations for and aids to local governmental units. The State's
fiscal problems affected other governmental units within the State, such as
local government, school districts and state agencies, which, in varying
degrees, also faced cash flow difficulties. In certain cases, revenues of
local governmental units and agencies were reduced by the recession.
Because of the State's fiscal problems, Standard & Poor's Corporation reduced
its rating on the State's outstanding general obligation bonds from AAA to AA+
in August 1981 and to AA in March 1982. Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
lowered its rating on the State's outstanding general obligation bonds from
Aaa to Aa in April 1982. The State's economy recovered in the July 1, 1983 to
June 30, 1985 biennium, and substantial reductions in the individual income
tax were enacted in 1984 and 1985. Standard & Poor's raised its rating on the
State's outstanding general obligation bonds to AA+ in January 1985. In 1986,
1987, 1991, 1992 and 1993, legislation was required to eliminate projected
budget deficits by raising additional revenue, reducing expenditures,
including aids to political subdivisions and higher education, reducing the
State's budget reserve (cash flow account), imposing a sales tax on purchases
by local governmental units, and making other budgetary adjustments. A budget
forecast released by the Minnesota Department of Finance on March 1, 1994
projects a balanced General Fund at the end of the current biennium, June 30,
1995, plus an increase in the State's cash flow account from $360 million to
$500 million. Total projected expenditures and transfers for the biennium are
$17.0 billion. The forecast also projects, however, a shortage of $29.5
million in the Local Government Trust Fund at June 30, 1995, against total
projected expenditures from the Fund of $1.8 billion for the biennium.
State grants and aids represent a large percentage of the total revenues of
cities, towns, counties and school districts in Minnesota. Even with respect
to Bonds that are revenue obligations of the issuer and not general
obligations of the State, there can be no assurance that the fiscal problems
referred to above will not adversely affect the market value or marketability
of the Bonds or the ability of the respective obligors to pay interest on and
principal of the Bonds.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Minnesota IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
We understand that the Minnesota Trust will only have income consisting of (i)
interest from bonds issued by the State of Minnesota and its political and
governmental subdivisions, municipalities and governmental agencies and
instrumentalities (the "Minnesota Bonds" ) and bonds issued by
possessions of the United States (the "Possession Bonds" ) and, with
the Minnesota Bonds (the "Bonds" ) which would be exempt from federal
and Minnesota income taxation when paid directly to an individual, trust or
estate, (ii) gain on the disposition of such Bonds, and (iii) proceeds paid
under certain insurance policies issued to the Trustee or to the issuers of
the Bonds which represent maturing interest or principal payments on defaulted
Bonds held by the Trustee.
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the Bonds to
be deposited in and held in the Trust. However, although no opinion is
expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that: (i) the Bonds
were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is excludible from gross income
for federal income tax purposes and (iii) the interest thereon is exempt from
income tax imposed by Minnesota that is applicable to individuals, trusts and
estates (the "Minnesota Income Tax" ). It should be noted that interest
on the Minnesota Bonds is subject to tax in the case of corporations subject
to the Minnesota Corporate Franchise Tax or the Corporate Alternative Minimum
Tax and is a factor in the computation of the Minimum Fee applicable to
financial institutions; no opinion is expressed with respect to the treatment
of interest on the Possession Bonds for purposes of such taxes. The opinion
set forth below does not address the taxation of persons other than full time
residents of Minnesota.
Although Minnesota state law provides that interest on Minnesota bonds is
exempt from Minnesota state income taxation, the Minnesota state legislature
has enacted a statement of intent that interest on Minnesota bonds should be
subject to Minnesota state income taxation if it is judicially determined that
the exemption discriminated against interstate commerce effective for the
calendar year in which such a decision becomes final. It cannot be predicted
whether a court would render such a decision or whether, as a result thereof,
interest on Minnesota bonds and therefore distributions by the Minnesota Trust
would become subject to Minnesota state income taxation.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, Counsel to the Sponsor, under existing
Minnesota income tax law as of the date of this prospectus and based upon the
assumptions above:
(1)The Minnesota IM-IT Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation
and each Unitholder of the Minnesota IM-IT Trust will be treated as the owner
of a pro rata portion of the Minnesota IM-IT Trust, and the income of such
portion of the Minnesota IM-IT Trust will therefore be treated as the income
of the Unitholder for Minnesota Income Tax purposes;
(2)Income on the Bonds which is excluable from Minnesota taxable income for
purposes of the Minnesota Income Tax when received by the Minnesota IM-IT
Trust and which would be excluable from Minnesota taxable income for purposes
of the Minnesota Income Tax if received directly by a Unitholder will be
exculable from Minnesota taxable income for purposes of the Minnesota Income
Tax when received by the Minnesota IM-IT Trust and distributed to such
Unitholder;
(3)To the extent that interest on certain Bonds (except with respect to
Possession Bonds, as to which no opinion is expressed) if any, is includible
in the computation of "alternative minimum taxable income" for federal
income tax purposes, such interest will also be includible in the computation
of "alternative minimum taxable income" for purposes of the Minnesota
Alternative Minimum Tax imposed on individuals, estates and trusts;
(4)Each Unitholder of the Minnesota IM-IT Trust will recognize gain or loss
for Minnesota Income Tax purposes if the Trustee disposes of a Bond (whether
by redemption, sale or otherwise) or if the Unitholder redeems or sells Units
of the Minnesota IM-IT Trust to the extent that such a transaction results in
a recognized gain or loss to such Unitholder for federal income tax purposes;
(5)Tax basis reduction requirements relating to amortization of bond premium
may, under some circumstances, result in Unitholders realizing taxable gain
for Minnesota Income Tax purposes when their Units are sold or redeemed for an
amount equal to or less than their original cost;
(6)Proceeds, if any, paid under individual insurance policies obtained by
issuers of Bonds or the Trustee which represent maturing interest on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee will be excludible from Minnesota net income
if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have been so excludible
from Minnesota net income if paid in the normal course by the issuer of the
defaulted obligation provided that, at the time such policies are purchased,
the amounts paid for such policies are reasonable, customary and consistent
with the reasonable expectation that the issuer of the bonds, rather than the
insurer, will pay debt service on the bonds; and
(7)To the extent that interest derived from the Minnesota IM-IT Trust by a
Unitholder with respect to any Possession Bonds is excludible from gross
income for federal income tax purposes, such interest will not be subject to
the Minnesota Income Tax.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in the
Minnesota IM-IT Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the
opinions of bond counsel with respect thereto, and therefore express no
opinions to the exemption from State income taxes of interest on the Bonds if
received directly by a Unitholder.
Chapman and Cutler has expressed no opinion with respect to taxation under any
other provision of Minnesota law. Ownership of the Units may result in
collateral Minnesota tax consequences to certain taxpayers. Prospective
investors should consult their tax advisors as to the applicability of any
such collateral consequences.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 53.56 $ 53.56
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>.......................... $ 2.36 $ 1.87
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit.................. -- --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 51.20 $ 51.69
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 51.20 $ 51.69
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively..................................... $ 4.27 $ 25.85
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.................. $ .14222 $ .14359
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F2><F3><F4>... 5.12% 5.17%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F2><F3><F4>................................ 5.18% 5.23%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996)...................... $ 5.26
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (July 1996)................. $ 13.93
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F4>............................ $ 4.27 $ 25.85
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee........... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the
Minnesota IM-IT Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--January and July
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
January and July commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F2>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F4>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
MINNESOTA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST SERIES 58
(IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Minnesota
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Maturity Date of Redemption IM-IT
Principal<F1> either Bonds Deposited or Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 210,000 Independent School District No. 719, Prior Lake,
Minnesota, General Obligation School Building Bonds,
Series 1996A (FGIC Insured) #5.10% Due 2/1/2012 ......... AAA 2006 @ 100 $199,053
290,000 Independent School District No. 192, Farmington,
Minnesota, Unlimited Tax-General Obligation School Bonds,
Series 1994 (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.125% Due 2003 @ 100
2/1/2015 .................................................. AAA 2012 @ 100 S.F. 272,324
250,000 Independent School District No. 2180, Maccray, Minnesota,
General Obligation School Building Bonds, Series 1995 2004 @ 100
(FSA Insured) #5.75% Due 2/1/2015 ....................... AAA 2012 @ 100 S.F. 252,007
250,000 Independent School District No.637 (Redwood Falls)
Minnesota, General Obligation School Building Refunding
Bonds, Series 1993 (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.125% Due 2004 @ 100
4/1/2015................................................... AAA 2011 @ 100 S.F. 234,700
500,000 St. Cloud, Minnesota, Hospital Facilities Revenue
Refunding Bonds (St. Cloud Hospital Issue) Series 1996A 2006 @ 101
(AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.00% Due 7/1/2015............. AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 456,435
50,000 St. Cloud, Minnesota, Hospital Facilities Revenue
Refunding Bonds (St. Cloud Hospital Issue) Series B (AMBAC 2006 @ 101
Indemnity Insured) #5.00% Due 7/1/2020 ................ AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 44,775
500,000 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Rental Housing Bonds, 2005 @ 102
Series 1995D (MBIA Insured) 6.00% Due 2/1/2022 .......... AAA 2018 @ 100 S.F. 504,935
250,000 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, Health Care Facilities
Revenue Bonds (HealthSystem Minnesota Obligated Group)
Series 1993A (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.20% Due 2003 @ 102
7/1/2023 .................................................. AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 229,220
500,000 Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota,
General Obligation Bonds, Series 1994 (MBIA Insured) 2004 @ 100
#5.125% Due 3/1/2024 ...................................... AAA 2018 @ 100 S.F. 454,830
240,000 Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota, Housing and
Redevelopment Authority, Health Care Revenue Bonds
(Children's Health Care) Series 1995A (FSA Insured) 2005 @ 102
#5.50% Due 8/15/2025 ...................................... AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 229,462
$ 3,040,000 $2,877,741
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
NEW JERSEY IM-IT TRUST
General. The New Jersey IM-IT Trust consists of 9 issues of Securities. One of
the Bonds in the New Jersey IM-IT Trust is a general obligation of the
governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing power thereof. The
remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total New Jersey IM-IT Trust) as follows: Transportation, 2 (30%); General
Obligations, 1 (16%); Higher Education, 1 (16%); Health Care, 2 (15%); Retail
Electric/Gas, 1 (13%) and Water and Sewer, 2 (10%). No Bond issue has received
a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. As described above, the New Jersey IM-IT Trust consists of a
portfolio of Bonds. The Trust is therefore susceptible to political, economic
or regulatory factors affecting issuers of the Bonds. The following
information provides only a brief summary of some of the complex factors
affecting the financial situation in New Jersey (the "State" ) and is
derived from sources that are generally available to investors and is believed
to be accurate. It is based in part on information obtained from various State
and local agencies in New Jersey. No independent verification has been made of
any of the following information.
New Jersey is the ninth largest state in population and the fifth smallest in
land area. With an average of 1,062 people per square mile, it is the most
densely populated of all the states. The state's economic base is
diversified, consisting of a variety of manufacturing, construction and
service industries, supplemented by rural areas with selective commercial
agriculture. Historically, New Jersey's average per capita income has been
well above the national average, and in 1993 the State ranked second among
states in per capita personal income ($26,967).
The New Jersey Economic Policy Council, a statutory arm of the New Jersey
Department of Commerce and Economic Development, has reported in New Jersey
Economic Indicators, a monthly publication of the New Jersey Department of
Labor, Division of Labor Market and Demographic Research, that in 1988 and
1989 employment in New Jersey's manufacturing sector failed to benefit from
the export boom experienced by many Midwest states and the State's service
sectors, which had fueled the State's prosperity since 1982, lost momentum.
In the meantime, the prolonged fast growth in the State in the mid 1980s
resulted in a tight labor market situation, which has led to relatively high
wages and housing prices. This means that, while the incomes of New Jersey
residents are relatively high, the State's business sector has become more
vulnerable to competitive pressures.
The onset of the national recession (which officially began in July 1990
according to the National Bureau of Economic Research) caused an acceleration
of New Jersey's job losses in construction and manufacturing. In addition,
the national recession caused an employment downturn in such previously
growing sectors as wholesale trade, retail trade, finance, utilities and
trucking and warehousing. Reflecting the downturn, the rate of unemployment in
the State rose from a low of 3.6% during the first quarter of 1989 to an
estimated 6.4% in February 1996, which is higher than the national average of
5.5% in February 1996. Economic recovery is likely to be slow and uneven in
New Jersey, with unemployment receding at a correspondingly slow pace, due to
the fact that some sectors may lag due to continued excess capacity. In
addition, employers even in rebounding sectors can be expected to remain
cautious about hiring until they become convinced that improved business will
be sustained. Also, certain firms will continue to merge or downsize to
increase profitability.
Debt Service. The primary method for State financing of capital projects is
through the sale of the general obligation bonds of the State. These bonds are
backed by the full faith and credit of the State tax revenues and certain
other fees are pledged to meet the principal and interest payments and if
provided, redemption premium payments, if any, required to repay the bonds. As
of June 30, 1993, there was a total authorized bond indebtedness of
approximately $8.98 billion, of which $3.6 billion was issued and outstanding,
$4.0 billion was retired (including bonds for which provision for payment has
been made through the sale and issuance of refunding bonds) and $1.38 billion
was unissued. The appropriation for the debt service obligation on such
outstanding indebtedness was $103.5 million for fiscal year 1995.
New Jersey's Budget and Appropriation System. The State operates on a fiscal
year beginning July 1 and ending June 30. At the end of fiscal year 1989,
there was a surplus in the State's general fund (the fund into which all
State revenues not otherwise restricted by statute are deposited and from
which appropriations are made) of $411.2 million. At the end of fiscal year
1990, there was a surplus in the general fund of $1 million. At the end of
fiscal year 1991, there was a surplus in the general fund of $1.4 million. New
Jersey closed its fiscal year 1992 with a surplus of $760.8 million. It is
estimated that New Jersey closed its fiscal year 1993 with a surplus of $937.4
million.
In order to provide additional revenues to balance future budgets, to
redistribute school aid and to contain real property taxes, on June 27, 1990,
and July 12, 1990, Governor Florio signed into law legislation which was
estimated to raise approximately $2.8 billion in additional taxes (consisting
of $1.5 billion in sales and use taxes and $1.3 billion in income taxes), the
biggest tax hike in New Jersey history. There can be no assurance that
receipts and collections of such taxes will meet such estimates.
The first part of the tax hike took effect on July 1, 1990, with the increase
in the State's sales and use tax rate from 6% to 7% and the elimination of
exemptions for certain products and services not previously subject to the
tax, such as telephone calls, paper products (which has since been
reinstated), soaps and detergents, janitorial services, alcoholic beverages
and cigarettes. At the time of enactment, it was projected that these taxes
would raise approximately $1.5 billion in additional revenue. Projections and
estimates of receipts from sales and use taxes, however, have been subject to
variance in recent fiscal years.
The second part of the tax hike took effect on January 1, 1991, in the form of
an increased state income tax on individuals. At the time of enactment, it was
projected that this increase would raise approximately $1.3 billion in
additional income taxes to fund a new school aid formula, a new homestead
rebate program and state assumption of welfare and social services costs.
Projections and estimates of receipts from income taxes, however, have also
been subject to variance in recent fiscal years. Under the legislation, income
tax rates increased from their previous range of 2% to 3.5% to a new range of
2% to 7%, with the higher rates applying to married couples with incomes
exceeding $70,000 who file joint returns, and to individuals filing single
returns with incomes of more than $35,000.
The Florio administration had contended that the income tax package will help
reduce local property tax increases by providing more state aid to
municipalities. Under the income tax legislation the State will assume
approximately $289 million in social services costs that previously were paid
by counties and municipalities and funded by property taxes. In addition,
under the new formula for funding school aid, an extra $1.1 billion was
proposed to be sent by the State to school districts beginning in 1991, thus
reducing the need for property tax increases to support education programs.
Effective July 1, 1992, the State's sales and use tax rate decreased from 7%
to 6%. Effective January 1, 1994, an across-the-board 5% reduction in the
income tax rates was enacted and effective January 1, 1995 further reductions
ranging from 1% up to 10% in income tax rates took effect. Governor Whitman
recently signed into law further reductions up to 15% for some taxpayers
effective January 1, 1996, completing her campaign promise to reduce income
taxes by up to 30% for most taxpayers within three years.
On June 30, 1995, Governor Whitman signed the New Jersey Legislature's $16.0
billion budget for Fiscal Year 1996. The balanced budget, which includes $541
million in surplus, is $300 million more than the 1995 budget. Whether the
State can achieve a balanced budget depends on its ability to enact and
implement expenditure reductions and to collect the estimated tax revenues.
Litigation. The State is a party in numerous legal proceedings pertaining to
matters incidental to the performance of routine governmental operations. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, claims asserted against the State
arising from alleged torts, alleged breaches of contracts, condemnation
proceedings and other alleged violations of State and Federal laws. Included
in the State's outstanding litigation are cases challenging the following:
the formula relating to State aid to public schools, the method by which the
State shares with its counties maintenance recoveries and costs for residents
in State institutions, unreasonably low Medicaid payment rates for long-term
facilities in New Jersey, the obligation of counties to maintain Medicaid or
Medicare eligible residents of institutions and facilities for the
developmentally disabled, taxes paid into the Spill Compensation Fund (a fund
established to provide money for use by the State to remediate hazardous waste
sites and to compensate other persons for damages incurred as a result of
hazardous waste discharge) based on Federal preemption, various provisions,
and the constitutionality, of the Fair Automobile Insurance Reform Act of
1990, the State's role in a consent order concerning the construction of a
resource facility in Passaic County, actions taken by the New Jersey Bureau of
Securities against an individual, the State's actions regarding alleged
chromium contamination of State-owned property in Hudson County, the issuance
of emergency redirection orders and a draft permit by the Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy, the adequacy of Medicaid reimbursement
for services rendered by doctors and dentists to Medicaid eligible children,
the Commissioner of Health's calculation of the hospital assessment required
by the Health Care Cost Reduction Act of 1991, refusal of the State to share
with Camden County federal funding the State recently received for
disproportionate share hospital payments made to county psychiatric
facilities, and the constitutionality of annual A-901 hazardous and solid
waste licensure renewal fees collected by the Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy. Adverse judgments in these and other matters could have
the potential for either a significant loss of revenue or a significant
unanticipated expenditure by the State.
At any given time, there are various numbers of claims and cases pending
against the State, State agencies and employees seeking recovery of monetary
damages that are primarily paid out of the fund created pursuant to the New
Jersey Tort Claims Act. In addition, at any given time, there are various
numbers of contract claims against the State and State agencies seeking
recovery of monetary damages. The State is unable to estimate its exposure for
these claims.
Debt Ratings. For many years, both Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and
Standard and Poor's Corporation rated New Jersey general obligation bonds
"Aaa" and "AAA" , respectively. On July 3, 1991, however,
Standard and Poor's Corporation downgraded New Jersey general obligation
bonds to "AA+." On June 4, 1992, Standard and Poor's Corporation
placed New Jersey general obligation bonds on CreditWatch with negative
implications, citing as its principal reason for its caution the unexpected
denial by the federal government of New Jersey's request for $450 million in
retroactive Medicaid payments for psychiatric hospitals. These funds were
critical to closing a $1 billion gap in the State's $15 billion budget for
fiscal year 1992 which ended on June 30, 1992. Under New Jersey state law, the
gap in the budget was required to be closed before the new budget year began
on July 1, 1992. Standard and Poor's suggested the State could close fiscal
1992's budget gap and help fill fiscal 1993's hole by a reversion of $700
million of pension contributions to its general fund under a proposal to
change the way the State calculates its pension liability.
On July 6, 1992, Standard and Poor's Corporation reaffirmed its "AA+"
rating for New Jersey general obligation bonds and removed the debt from its
CreditWatch list, although it stated that New Jersey's long-term financial
outlook was negative. Standard and Poor's Corporation was concerned that the
State was entering fiscal 1993 with only a $26 million surplus and remained
concerned about whether the State economy would recover quickly enough to meet
lawmakers' revenue projections. It also remained concerned about the recent
federal ruling leaving in doubt how much the State was due in retroactive
Medicaid reimbursements and a ruling by a federal judge, now on appeal, of the
State's method for paying for uninsured hospital patients. However, on July
27, 1994, Standard and Poor's announced that it was changing the State's
outlook from negative to stable due to a brightening of the State's prospects
as a result of Governor Whitman's effort to trim spending and cut taxes,
coupled with an improving economy. Standard and Poor's reaffirmed its "
AA+" rating at the same time.
On August 24, 1992, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. downgraded New Jersey
general obligation bonds to "Aa1," stating that the reduction
reflected a developing pattern of reliance on nonrecurring measures to achieve
budgetary balance, four years of financial operations marked by revenue
shortfalls and operating deficits, and the likelihood that serious financial
pressures will persist. On August 5, 1994, Moody's reaffirmed its "
Aa1" rating, citing on the positive side New Jersey's broad-based
economy, high income levels, history of maintaining a positive financial
position and moderate (albeit rising) debt ratios, and on the negative side, a
continued reliance on one-time revenue and a dependence on pension-related
savings to achieve budgetary balance.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on New
Jersey IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
In the opinion of Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, special counsel to the Fund
for New Jersey tax matters, under existing law:
(1)The New Jersey IM-IT Trust will be recognized as a trust and not an
association taxable as a corporation. The New Jersey IM-IT Trust will not be
subject to the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax or the New Jersey
Corporation Income Tax.
(2)With respect to the non-corporate Unitholders who are residents of New
Jersey, the income of the New Jersey IM-IT Trust which is allocable to each
such Unitholder will be treated as the income of such Unitholder under the New
Jersey Gross Income Tax. Interest on the underlying Bonds which would be
exempt from New Jersey Gross Income Tax if directly received by such
Unitholder will retain its status as tax-exempt interest when received by the
New Jersey IM-IT Trust and distributed to such Unitholder. Any proceeds paid
under the insurance policy issued to the Trustee of the New Jersey IM-IT Trust
with respect to the Bonds or under individual policies obtained by issuers of
Bonds which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the
Trustee will be exempt from New Jersey Gross Income Tax if, and to the same
extent as, such interest would have been so exempt if paid by the issuer of
the defaulted obligations.
(3)A non-corporate Unitholder will not be subject to the New Jersey Gross
Income Tax on any gain realized either when the New Jersey IM-IT Trust
disposes of a Bond (whether by sale, exchange, redemption, or payment at
maturity), when the Unitholder redeems or sells his Units or upon payment of
any proceeds under the insurance policy issued to the Trustee of the New
Jersey IM-IT Trust with respect to the Bonds or under individual policies
obtained by issuers of Bonds which represent maturing principal on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee. Any loss realized on such disposition may not
be utilized to offset gains realized by such Unitholder on the disposition of
assets the gain on which is subject to the New Jersey Gross Income Tax.
(4)Units of the New Jersey IM-IT Trust may be taxable on the death of a
Unitholder under the New Jersey Transfer Inheritance Tax Law or the New Jersey
Estate Tax Law.
(5)If a Unitholder is a corporation subject to the New Jersey Corporation
Business Tax or New Jersey Corporation Income Tax, interest from the Bonds in
the New Jersey IM-IT Trust which is allocable to such corporation will be
includable in its entire net income for purposes of the New Jersey Corporation
Business Tax or New Jersey Corporation Income Tax, less any interest expense
incurred to carry such investment to the extent such interest expense has not
been deducted in computing Federal taxable income. Net gains derived by such
corporation on the disposition of the Bonds by the New Jersey IM-IT Trust or
on the disposition of its Units will be included in its entire net income for
purposes of the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax or New Jersey Corporation
Income Tax. Any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the Trustee
of the New Jersey IM-IT Trust with respect to the Bonds or under individual
policies obtained by issuers of Bonds which represent maturing interest or
maturing principal on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be
included in its entire net income for purposes of the New Jersey Corporation
Business Tax or New Jersey Corporation Income Tax if, and to the same extent
as, such interest or proceeds would have been so included if paid by the
issuer of the defaulted obligations.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 54.94 $ 54.94
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>.......................... $ 2.32 $ 1.92
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit.................. -- --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 52.62 $ 53.02
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 52.62 $ 53.02
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively..................................... $ 4.39 $ 26.51
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.................. $ .14615 $ .14727
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F2><F3><F4>... 5.26% 5.30%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F2><F3><F4>................................ 5.29% 5.33%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996)...................... $ 5.41
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (July 1996)................. $ 14.29
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F4>............................ $ 4.39 $ 26.51
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee........... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the
New Jersey IM-IT Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--January and July
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
January and July commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F2>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F4>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
NEW JERSEY INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST SERIES 110
(IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To New
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Maturity Date of Redemption Jersey IM-IT
Principal<F1> either Bonds Deposited or Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Consolidated
Bonds, Ninety-First Series (FGIC Insured) #5.20% Due 2003 @ 101
11/15/2020 ..................................................... AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. $ 460,505
190,000 New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Water Facilities
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Middlesex Water Company Project)
Series 1993B (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.20% Due 10/1/2022... AAA 2003 @ 102 174,416
100,000 New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Water Facilities
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Hackensack Water Company Project)
Series 1994A (MBIA Insured) #5.80% Due 3/1/2024............... AAA 2004 @ 102 100,500
300,000 New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue
Bonds (Newark Beth Israel Medical Center Issue) Series 1994 2004 @ 102
(FSA Insured) #6.00% Due 7/1/2024 ............................ AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 305,304
150,000 New Jersey Economic Development Authority Revenue Bonds (Clara
Maass Health System Obligated Group Project) Series 1996 (FSA 2006 @ 102
Insured) #5.00% Due 7/1/2025 ................................. AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 132,977
500,000 Essex County Improvement Authority (Essex County, New Jersey)
County of Essex General Obligation Lease Revenue Bonds
(Gibraltar Building Project) Series 1995 (MBIA Insured) 5.95% 2005 @ 102
Due 12/1/2025 .................................................. AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 508,745
400,000 Delaware River Port Authority, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 2006 @ 102
Revenue Bonds, Series 1995 (FGIC Insured) #5.50% Due 1/1/2026 AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 379,216
500,000 New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Trenton State College Issue, Series 1996A (MBIA Insured) 5.75% 2006 @ 101
Due 7/1/2026 ................................................... AAA 2025 @ 100 S.F. 498,900
380,000 Pollution Control Financing Authority of Salem County (New
Jersey) Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Public
Service Electric and Gas Company Project) Series 1993 (MBIA
Insured) 5.55% Due 11/1/2033 ................................. AAA 2003 @ 102 360,920
$ 3,020,000 $ 2,921,483
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST
General. The Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust consists of 10 issues of Securities.
Three of the Bonds in the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust are general obligations of
the governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power
thereof. The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific
project or authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy
taxes. These issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of
principal amount to total Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust) as follows: Retail
Electric/Gas, 2 (25%); General Obligations, 3 (22%); Higher Education, 2
(19%); Water and Sewer, 1 (14%); Transportation, 1 (12%) and Waste Disposal, 1
(8%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. Investors should be aware of certain factors that might affect
the financial conditions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania
historically has been identified as a heavy industry state although that
reputation has changed recently as the industrial composition of the
Commonwealth diversified when the coal, steel and railroad industries began to
decline. A more diversified economy was necessary as the traditionally strong
industries in the Commonwealth declined due to a long-term shift in jobs,
investment and workers away from the northeast part of the nation. The major
sources of growth in Pennsylvania are in the service sector, including trade,
medical and the health services, education and financial institutions.
Pennsylvania's agricultural industries are also an important component of the
Commonwealth's economic structure, accounting for more than $3.6 billion in
crop and livestock products annually, while agribusiness and food related
industries support $39 billion in economic activity annually.
Non-agricultural employment in the Commonwealth declined by 5.1 percent during
the recessionary period from 1980 to 1983. In 1984, the declining trend was
reversed as employment grew by 2.9 percent over 1983 levels. From 1983 to
1990, Commonwealth employment continued to grow each year, increasing an
additional 14.3 percent. For the three years ended 1993, unemployment in the
Commonwealth declined 1.2 percent.
Back to back recessions in the early 1980s reduced the manufacturing sector's
employment levels moderately during 1980 and 1981, sharply during 1982, and
even further in 1983. Non-manufacturing employment has increased steadily
since 1980 to its 1993 level of 81.6 percent of total Commonwealth employment.
Consequently, manufacturing employment constitutes a diminished share of total
employment within the Commonwealth. Manufacturing, contributing 18.4 percent
of 1993 non-agricultural employment, has fallen behind both the services
sector and the trade sector as the largest single source of employment within
the Commonwealth. In 1993 the services sector accounted for 29.9 percent of
all non-agricultural employment while the trade sector accounted for 22.4
percent.
From 1983 to 1989, Pennsylvania's annual average unemployment rate dropped
from 11.8 percent to 4.5 percent, falling below the national rate in 1986 for
the first time in over a decade. Pennsylvania's annual average unemployment
rate remained below the national average from 1986 until 1990. Slower economic
growth caused the unemployment rate in the Commonwealth to rise to 6.9 percent
in 1991 and 7.5 percent in 1992. The resumption of faster economic growth
resulted in a decrease in the Commonwealth's unemployment rate to 7.1 percent
in 1993. As of March 1995, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the
Commonwealth was 6.0 percent compared to 5.5 percent for the United States.
The five year period from fiscal 1990 through fiscal 1994 was marked by public
health and welfare costs growing at a rate double the growth rate for all the
state expenditures. Rising caseloads, increased utilization of services and
rising prices joined to produce the rapid rise of public health and welfare
costs at a time when a national recession caused tax revenues to stagnate and
even decline. During the period from fiscal 1989 through fiscal 1993, public
health and welfare costs rose by an average annual rate of 9.4 percent while
tax revenues were growing at an average annual rate of 5.8 percent.
Consequently, spending on other budget programs was restrained to a growth
rate below 4.7 percent and sources of revenues other than taxes became larger
components of fund revenues. Among those sources are transfers from other
funds and hospital and nursing home pooling of contributions to use as federal
matching funds.
Tax revenues declined in fiscal 1991 as a result of the recession in the
economy. A $2.7 billion tax increase enacted for fiscal 1992 brought financial
stability to the General Fund. That tax increase included several taxes with
retroactive effective dates which generated some one-time revenues during
fiscal 1992. The absence of those revenues in fiscal 1993 contributed to the
decline in tax revenues shown for fiscal 1993. Fiscal 1994 revenues increased
4.1 percent, but a decline in other revenues caused by the end of medical
assistance pooled financing in fiscal 1993 held total revenues to a 1.8
percent gain. Expenditures for fiscal 1994 rose by 4.3 percent.
It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local
Pennsylvania issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations
issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and there is no obligation on the
part of the Commonwealth to make payment on such local obligations in the
event of default.
Financial information for the principal operating funds of the Commonwealth is
maintained on a budgetary basis of accounting. A budgetary basis of accounting
is used for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the enacted operating
budget and is governed by applicable statutes of the Commonwealth and by
administrative procedures. The Commonwealth also prepares annual financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("
GAAP" ). The budgetary basis financial information maintained by the
Commonwealth to monitor and enforce budgetary control is adjusted at fiscal
year-end to reflect appropriate accruals for financial reporting in conformity
with GAAP.
Fiscal 1992 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: During fiscal 1992 the General Fund
reported a $1.1 billion operating surplus. This operating surplus was achieved
through legislated tax rate increases and tax base broadening measures enacted
in August 1991 and by controlling expenditures through numerous cost reduction
measures implemented throughout the fiscal year. As a result of the fiscal
1992 operating surplus, the fund balance increased to $87.5 million and the
unreserved-undesignated deficit dropped to $138.6 million from its fiscal 1991
level of $1,146.2 million.
Budgetary Basis: Total revenues for the fiscal year were $14,516.8 million, a
$2,654.5 million increase over cash revenues during fiscal 1991. Largely due
to the tax revisions enacted for the budget, corporate tax receipts totalled
$3,761.2 million, up from $2,656.3 million in fiscal 1991, sales tax receipts
increased by $302 million to $4,499.7 million, and personal income tax
receipts totalled $4,807.4 million, an increase of $1,443.8 million over
receipts in fiscal 1991.
Spending increases in the fiscal 1992 budget were largely accounted for by
increases for education, social services and corrections programs.
Commonwealth funds for the support of public schools were increased by 9.8
percent to provide a $438 million increase to $4.9 billion for fiscal 1992.
Child welfare appropriations supporting county operated child welfare programs
were increased $67 million, more than 31.5 percent over fiscal 1991. Other
social service areas such as medical and cash assistance also received
significant funding increases as costs rose quickly as a result of the
economic recession and high inflation rates of medical care costs. The costs
of corrections programs, reflecting the marked increase in the prisoner
population, increased by 12 percent. Economic development efforts, largely
funded from bond proceeds in fiscal 1991, were continued with General Fund
appropriations for fiscal 1992.
The budget included the use of several Medicaid pooled financing transactions.
These pooling transactions replaced $135 million of Commonwealth funds,
allowing total spending under the budget to increase by an equal amount.
Fiscal 1993 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: The fund balance of the General
Fund increased by $611.4 million during the fiscal year, led by an increase in
the unreserved balance of $576.8 million over the prior fiscal year balance.
At June 30, 1993, the fund balance totalled $698.9 and the
unreserved/undesignated balance totalled $64.4 million. The increase in the
fund balance and a return to a positive unreserved-undesignated balance
provided indication of a continuing recovery of the Commonwealth's financial
condition.
Budgetary Basis: The 1993 fiscal year closed with revenues higher than
anticipated and expenditures about as projected, resulting in an ending
unappropriated balance surplus (prior to the ten percent transfer to the Tax
Stabilization Reserve Fund) of $242.3 million, slightly higher than estimated.
Cash revenues were $41.5 million above the budget estimate and totalled
$14.633 billion representing less than a one percent increase over revenues
for the 1992 fiscal year. A reduction in the personal income tax rate in July
1992 and the one-time receipt of revenues from retroactive corporate tax
increases in fiscal 1992 were responsible, in part, for the low revenue growth
in fiscal 1993.
Appropriations less lapses totalled $13.870 billion representing a 1.1 percent
increase over expenditures during fiscal 1992. The low growth in spending is a
consequence of a low rate of revenue growth, significant one-time expenses
during fiscal 1992, increased tax refund reserves to cushion against adverse
decisions on pending litigations, and the receipt of federal funds for
expenditures previously paid out of Commonwealth funds.
By state statute, ten percent of the budgetary basis unappropriated surplus at
the end of a fiscal year is to be transferred to the Tax Stabilization Reserve
Fund. The transfer for the fiscal 1993 balance was $24.2 million. The
remaining unappropriated surplus of $218.0 million was carried forward into
the 1994 fiscal year.
Fiscal 1994 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: The fund balance increased $194.0
million due largely to an increased reserve for encumbrances and an increase
in other designated funds. The unreserved-undesignated balance increased by
$14.8 million to $72.2 million. Revenues and other sources increased by 1.8
percent over the prior fiscal year while expenditures and other uses increased
by 4.3 percent. Consequently, the operating surplus declined to $179.4 million
for fiscal 1994 from $686.3 million for fiscal 1993.
Budgetary Basis: Commonwealth revenues during the fiscal year totalled
$15,210.7 million, $38.6 million above the fiscal year estimate, and 3.9
percent over Commonwealth revenues during the previous fiscal year. The sales
tax was an important contributor to the higher than estimated revenues.
Collections from the sales tax were $5.124 billion, a 6.1 percent increase
from the prior fiscal year and $81.3 million above estimate. The strength of
collections from the sales tax offset the lower than budgeted performance of
the personal income tax which ended the fiscal year $74.4 million below
estimate. The shortfall in the personal income tax was largely due to
shortfalls in income not subject to withholding such as interest, dividends
and other income. Tax refunds in fiscal 1994 were reduced substantially below
the $530 million amount provided in fiscal 1993. The higher fiscal 1993 amount
and the reduced fiscal 1994 amount occurred because reserves of approximately
$160 million were added to fiscal 1993 tax refunds to cover potential payments
if the Commonwealth lost litigation known as Philadelphia Suburban Corp v.
Commonwealth. Those reserves were carried into fiscal 1994 until the
litigation was decided in the Commonwealth's favor in December 1993 and
$147.3 million of reserves for tax refunds were released.
Expenditures, excluding pooled financing expenditures and net of all fiscal
1994 appropriation lapses, totalled $14,934.4 million representing a 7.2
percent increase over fiscal 1993 expenditures. Medical assistance and
corrections spending contributed to the rate of spending growth for the fiscal
year.
The Commonwealth maintained an operating balance on a budgetary basis for
fiscal 1994 producing a fiscal year ending unappropriated surplus of $335.8
million. By state statute, ten percent ($33.6 million) of that surplus
transferred to the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund and the remaining balance
was carried over into the fiscal 1995 fiscal year. The balance in the Tax
Stabilization Reserve Fund as of March 31, 1995 was $65.3 million.
Fiscal 1995 Budget. The approved fiscal 1995 budget provided for $15,665.7
million of appropriations from Commonwealth funds, an increase of 4.0 percent
over appropriations, including supplemental appropriations, for fiscal 1994.
Medical assistance expenditures represent the largest single increase in the
budget ($221 million) representing a nine percent increase over the prior
fiscal year. The budget includes a reform of the state-funded public
assistance program that added certain categories of eligibility to the program
but also limited the availability of such assistance to other eligible
persons. Education subsidies to local school districts were increased by
$132.2 million to continue the increased funding for the poorest school
districts in the state.
Several tax reductions were enacted with the fiscal 1995 budget. Low income
working families will benefit from an increase to the dependent exemption to
$3,000 from $1,500 for the first dependent and from $1,000 for all additional
dependents. A reduction to the corporate net income tax rate from 12.25
percent to 9.99 percent to be phased in over a period of four years was
enacted. A net operating loss provision has been added to the corporate net
income tax and will be phased in over three years with an annual $500,000 cap
on losses used to offset profits. Several other tax changes to the sales tax,
the inheritance tax and the capital stock and franchise tax also were enacted.
Estimated commonwealth revenue reductions from these tax cuts have been raised
from $166.4 million to $173.4 million based on upward revised estimates of
commonwealth revenues for the fiscal 1995 to 6.3 percent, excluding the effect
of the fiscal 1995 tax reductions, and is largely due to actual and
anticipated higher collections of the corporate net income tax, the sales and
use tax and miscellaneous collections.
After a review of the fiscal 1994 budget in January 1995, $64.9 million of
additional appropriation needs were identified for the fiscal year. Of this
amount, the largest are for medical assistance ($21.8 million) and general
assistance cash grants ($10.3 million). The balance of the additional
appropriation needs are for other public welfare programs, educational
subsidies and office relocation costs due to a fire. The supplemental
appropriations requested are proposed to be funded from appropriation lapses
estimated to total $172 million for the fiscal year.
With the revised estimates for revenues, appropriations and lapses for the
1994 fiscal year, an unappropriated balance prior to transfers to the Tax
Stabilization Reserve Fund of $395.5 million is projected, an increase from
the $335.8 million fiscal year 1993 ending balance (prior to transfers).
Fiscal 1996 Budget. The fiscal 1996 budget was approved by the Governor on
June 30, 1995. The budget includes spending growth of 2.7%. It includes a
reduction of the Corporate Net Income Tax from 10.99% to 9.99% retroactive to
January 1, 1995. The budget includes a proportionate increase in funds for
public safety and education and a proportionate decrease in funds for welfare.
Proposed Fiscal 1996 Budget. On February 6, 1996, Pennsylvania Governor Tom
Ridge presented his proposed budget to the General Assembly for the fiscal
year beginning July 1, 1996. Ridge's budget proposes that state spending be
reduced from $16.22 billion to $16.19 billion, a $30 million cut. The proposed
budget provides a $60 million tax cut to spur economic growth, including a new
$30 million Job Creation Tax Credit, and the partial elimination of the sales
tax on computer services. The General Assembly will proceed with its
consideration of the fiscal 1997 budget.
All outstanding general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth are rated AA- by
S&P and A1 by Moody's.
Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings must be obtained
from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any ratings will continue
for any period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn.
The City of Philadelphia ("Philadelphia" ) is the largest city in the
Commonwealth, with an estimated population of 1,585,577 according to the 1990
Census. Philadelphia functions both as a city of the first class and a county
for the purpose of administering various governmental programs.
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 1991, Philadelphia experienced a
cumulative General Fund balance deficit of $153.5 million. The audit findings
for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1992, placed the Cumulative General Fund
balance deficit at $224.9.
Legislation providing for the establishment of the Pennsylvania
Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority ("PICA" ) to assist first class
cities in remedying fiscal emergencies was enacted by the General Assembly and
approved by the Governor in June, 1991. PICA is designed to provide assistance
through the issuance of funding debt to liquidate budget deficits and to make
factual findings and recommendations to the assisted city concerning its
budgetary and fiscal affairs. An intergovernmental cooperation agreement
between Philadelphia and PICA was approved by City Council on January 3, 1992,
and approved by the PICA Board and signed by the Mayor on January 8, 1992. At
this time, Philadelphia is operating under a five year fiscal plan approved by
PICA on April 17, 1995 in which Philadelphia projects a balanced budget in
each of the five years (fiscal years 1996 through 2000) covered by the plan.
In June 1992, PICA issued $474,555,000 of its Special Tax Revenue Bonds to
provide financial assistance to Philadelphia and to liquidate the cumulative
General Fund balance deficit. PICA issued $643,430,000 in July 1993 and
$178,675,000 in August 1993 of Special Tax Revenue Bonds to refund certain
general obligation bonds of the City and to fund additional capital projects.
In December 1994, PICA issued $122,020,000 of Special Tax Revenue Bonds to
fund additional capital projects.
As of the date hereof, the ratings on the City's long-term obligations
supported by payments from the City's General Fund are rated Baa by Moody's
and BBB- by S&P. Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings
must be obtained from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any
ratings will continue for any period of time or that they will not be revised
or withdrawn.
The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the
financial difficulties which may impact certain issuers of bonds and does not
purport to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions
to which the issuers of the Bonds in the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust are subject.
Additionally, many factors including national economic, social and
environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the
issuers of Bonds, could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of
the State and various agencies and political subdivisions located in the
State. The Sponsor is unable to predict whether or to what extent such factors
or other factors may affect the issuers of Bonds, the market value or
marketability of the Bonds or the ability of the respective issuers of the
Bonds acquired by the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust to pay interest on or principal
of the Bonds.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
In the opinion of Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, counsel to the Fund for
Pennsylvania tax matters, under existing law:
(1)Units evidencing fractional undivided interest in the Pennsylvania IM-IT
Trust, to the extent represented by obligations issued by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, any public authority, commission, board or other agency created
by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, any political subdivision of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or any public authority created by any such
political subdivision, are not taxable under any of the personal property
taxes presently in effect in Pennsylvania;
(2)Distributions of interest income to Unitholders that would not be taxable
if received directly by a Pennsylvania resident are not subject to personal
income tax under the Pennsylvania Tax Reform Code of 1971; nor will such
interest be taxable under the Philadelphia School District Investment Income
Tax imposed on Philadelphia resident individuals;
(3)A Unitholder will have a taxable event under the Pennsylvania state and
local income taxes referred to in the preceding paragraph upon the redemption
or sale of his Units;
(4)Units are subject to Pennsylvania inheritance and estate taxes;
(5)A Unitholder which is a corporation will have a taxable event under the
Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax upon the redemption or sale of its
Units. Interest income distributed to Unitholders which are corporations is
not subject to Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax or Mutual Thrift
Institutions Tax. However, banks, title insurance companies and trust
companies may be required to take the value of Units into account in
determining the taxable value of their shares subject to Shares Tax;
(6)Gains derived by the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust from the sale, exchange or
other disposition of Bonds may be subject to Pennsylvania personal or
corporate income taxes. Those gains which are distributed by the Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trust to Unitholders who are individuals may be subject to Pennsylvania
Personal Income Tax. For Unitholders which are corporations, the distributed
gains may be subject to Corporate Net Income Tax or Mutual Thrift Institutions
Tax. Gains which are not distributed by the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust may
nevertheless be taxable to Unitholders if derived by the Pennsylvania IM-IT
Trust from the sale, exchange or other disposition of Bonds issued on or after
February 1, 1994. Gains which are not distributed by the Pennsylvania IM-IT
Trust will remain nontaxable to Unitholders if derived by the Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trust from the sale, exchange or other disposition of Bonds issued prior
to February 1, 1994;
(7)Any proceeds paid under insurance policies issued to the Trustee or
obtained by issuers or the underwriters of the Bonds, the Sponsor or others
which represent interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be
excludable from Pennsylvania gross income if, and to the same extent as, such
interest would have been so excludable if paid in the normal course by the
issuer of the defaulted obligations; and
(8)The Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust is not taxable as a corporation under
Pennsylvania tax laws applicable to corporations.
In rendering its opinion, Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul has not, for timing
reasons, made an independent review of proceedings related to the issuance of
the Bonds. It has relied on Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc. for
assurance that the Bonds have been issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
or by or on behalf of municipalities or other governmental agencies within the
Commonwealth.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 55.05 $ 55.05
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>.......................... $ 2.43 $ 1.96
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit.................. -- --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 52.62 $ 53.09
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit......................... $ 52.62 $ 53.09
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively..................................... $ 4.39 $ 26.55
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit.................. $ .14616 $ .14746
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F2><F3><F4>... 5.26% 5.31%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F2><F3><F4>................................ 5.29% 5.34%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996)...................... $ 5.41
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (July 1996)................. $ 14.30
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F4>............................ $ 4.39 $ 26.55
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee........... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--January and July
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
January and July commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F2>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F4>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
PENNSYLVANIA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST SERIES 216
(IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Pennsylvania
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Maturity Date of either Redemption IM-IT
Principal<F1> Bonds Deposited or Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 280,000 Seneca Valley School District (Butler County, Pennsylvania)
General Obligation Bonds, Series 1995 (FGIC Insured) #5.85% 2005 @ 100
Due 2/15/2020.................................................... AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. $281,400
160,000 Allegheny County Higher Education Building Authority
(Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) University Revenue Bonds
(Duquesne University Project) Series 1996A (AMBAC Indemnity 2006 @ 102
Insured) #5.00% Due 3/1/2021................................... AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 143,069
400,000 Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority
(Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) Revenue Bonds, State System of
Higher Education, Series 1996N (MBIA Insured) #5.875% Due 2006 @ 100
6/15/2021........................................................ AAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 403,496
435,000 Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority (Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania) Water and Sewer System First Lien Revenue Bonds, 2005 @ 100
Series 1995A (FGIC Insured) #5.60% Due 9/1/2022................ AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 422,611
250,000 City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Gas Works Revenue Bonds, 2004 @ 102
Fifteenth Series (FSA Insured) #5.25% Due 8/1/2024............. AAA 2022 @ 100 S.F. 229,630
200,000 School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation Bonds, Series 1995B (AMBAC Indemnity 2005 @ 101
Insured) #5.50% Due 9/1/2025................................... AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 189,350
350,000 Delaware River Port Authority, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 2006 @ 102
Revenue Bonds, Series 1995 (FGIC Insured) #5.50% Due 1/1/2026.. AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 333,228
200,000 Central Greene School District (Greene County, Pennsylvania)
General Obligation Bonds, Series 1996 (AMBAC Indemnity 2006 @ 100
Insured) #5.35% Due 2/15/2026.................................. AAA 2019 @ 100 S.F. 186,944
250,000 Beaver County Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania,
Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Pennsylvania Power
Company Beaver Valley Project) Series 1995A (AMBAC Indemnity
Insured) 6.00% Due 9/1/2028.................................... AAA 2005 @ 102 253,288
500,000 Beaver County Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania,
Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (Ohio
Edison Company Mansfield Project) AMBAC Indemnity Insured
#5.45% Due 9/15/2033............................................. AAA 2003 @ 102 468,960
$3,025,000 $2,911,976
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts" .
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
VIRGINIA QUALITY TRUST
General. The Virginia Quality Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities. One of
the Bonds in the Virginia Quality Trust is a general obligation of the
governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing power thereof. The
remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Virginia Quality Trust) as follows: Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue, 2
(33%); Water and Sewer, 1 (17%); Higher Education, 1 (16%); Health Care, 1
(15%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (8%); Waste Disposal, 1 (7%) and General
Obligations, 1 (4%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. The Commonwealth's financial condition is supported by a
broad-based economy, including manufacturing, tourism, agriculture, ports,
mining and fisheries. Manufacturing continues to be a major source of
employment, ranking behind only services, wholesale and retail trade, and
government (Federal, state and local). The Federal government is a major
employer in Virginia due to the heavy concentration of Federal employees in
the metropolitan Washington, D.C. segment of northern Virginia and the
military employment in the Hampton Roads area, which houses the nation's
largest concentration of military installations, although civilian defense
employment has been affected by the retrenchment of the military sector and is
likely to decrease further.
Although the Commonwealth enjoyed an economic boom in the mid-1980's, the
Commonwealth's economy began to slow toward the end of the decade, and went
into a recession with the rest of the nation after July, 1990. Gradual
recovery has continued since the recession's end in March, 1991, with the
Virginia economy providing reason for restrained optimism in fiscal year 1994.
Employment figures furnished more encouragement than did income data. The
state unemployment rates continued to be a bright spot, dropping to 4.9
percent for fiscal year 1994, compared to 6.4 percent nationally. However, the
possibility of more defense cutbacks and additional plant downsizings provided
two cautionary notes. Real taxable sales have nearly reached the pre-recession
level of fiscal year 1990.
The impact of national trends on the Commonwealth is clearly seen in personal
income figures. While year-to-year percentage changes in the Commonwealth
personal income generally parallel those at the national level, the
Commonwealth figures were higher during the first half of the 1980's. The
differential has narrowed since 1988. In the first quarter of 1994, the most
recent available, Virginia's growth rate was 6.1 percent compared to 3.9
percent for the nation. While Virginia's real per capita personal income
surpassed the national figure in 1982 and has continued to exceed it, the
relative differential has been narrowing since 1989 and is now the smallest
since 1985. Virginia's 1989 maximum was 106 percent of national per capita
income while the 1993 figure was 104 percent. In comparison with the South
Atlantic region, Virginia's real per capita income has declined from a peak of
108 percent in 1989 to 106 percent in 1993.
Virginia's nonagricultural employment figure has also mirrored the national
economy. For fiscal year 1994 Virginia's nonagricultural employment rose 2.9
percent, comparable to the pre-recession rate. Total nonagricultural
employment for Virginia in June 1994 was a record high. During the period
1988-1990, the Commonwealth substantially outpaced the nation in growth of
nonagricultural employment, with 4.1 percent average annual growth compared to
2.8 percent nationally; however, the trend lines for both have been nearly
parallel since 1990. For the period 1985-1990, the Commonwealth went ahead of
the South Atlantic region, but was hit harder by the recession in 1990 and the
defense adjustment. Since then, the region has outperformed the Commonwealth.
With respect to unemployment, Virginia's unemployment rate has consistently
been below that of the nation. For the decade of 1980 to 1990, the
differential has been two percentage points, although it decreased to below
one percentage point in 1991 and 1992. For the first six months of fiscal year
1994, the Commonwealth's unemployment rate was 4.9 percent, compared to the
national rate of 6.4 percent.
Employment trends in Virginia have varied from sector to sector and from
region to region. Most sectors showed dramatic improvement compared to the
anemic performance in fiscal year 1993. Employment grew in seven of ten
categories. This past fiscal year's growth was led by a 5.4 percent employment
jump in the construction sector and 5.3 percent in services. Federal civilian
employment slipped 3 percent, the result of continued defense cutbacks and an
effort to downsize. Once again, the greatest percent loss was in mining, which
suffered a 7.7 percent drop, a 40 percent greater loss than the previous year.
The service sector continued to grow and mining and manufacturing are now at
lower levels than in 1980. Employment trends also varied among regions. All of
the Commonwealth's metropolitan statistical areas showed increased employment
from fiscal year 1993 to fiscal year 1994, ranging from 1.1 percent to 4.3
percent, with most employment increases being experienced in metropolitan
areas.
Highest rates of unemployment were found in southwest Virginia where mining
jobs have been lost and the lowest unemployment rates were seen in northern
Virginia where much federally-related employment is concentrated. As would be
expected, there was great overlap between areas of lowest unemployment and
those of highest per capita income.
Virginia appears to have fully participated in the national economic recovery,
which has been slow by historic standards. The State has not yet returned to
pre-recession growth rates for several measures, particularly real per capita
personal income. The next round of defense cutbacks and the uncertain duration
of the economic recovery are continuing sources of concern. A growing
diversification of the State's export base is encouraging for the long-term
but will not insulate the State from vulnerability to increased competition
against its major products and to economic conditions abroad.
The Commonwealth of Virginia has historically operated on a fiscally
conservative basis and is required by its Constitution to have a balanced
biennial budget. At the end of the June 30, 1994, fiscal year, the General
Fund had an ending fund balance computed on a budgetary cash basis of $518.7
million, of which $81 million was in required reserve; Approximately $430
million thereof was designated for expenditure during the next fiscal year,
leaving an undesignated, unreserved fund balance of $7.6 million, the third
consecutive such undesignated fund balance. Computed on a modified accrual
basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the General
Fund balance at the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994, was $185.3
million, compared with a General Fund balance at the end of the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1993, of minus $78.8 million. This is the second year since
1989 that the General Fund, measured on a modified accrual basis, has shown a
positive fund balance.
As of June 30, 1994, total debt of the Commonwealth aggregated $8.4 billion.
Of that amount, $2.5 billion was tax-supported. Outstanding general obligation
debt backed by the full faith and credit of the Commonwealth was $792 million
at June 30, 1994. Of that amount, $500 million was also secured by revenue
producing capital projects.
The Virginia Constitution contains limits on the amount of general obligation
bonds which the Commonwealth can issue. These limits are substantially in
excess of current levels of outstanding bonds, and at June 30, 1994 would
permit an additional total of approximately $5.6 billion of bonds secured by
revenue-producing projects and approximately $5.8 billion of unsecured general
obligation bonds, with not more than approximately $921 million of the latter
to be issued in any four-year period. Bonds which are not secured by
revenue-producing projects must be approved in a state-wide election.
The Commonwealth of Virginia maintains a "triple A" rating from
Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch Investors Service on its general
obligation indebtedness, reflecting in part its sound fiscal management,
diversified economic base and low debt ratios. There can be no assurance that
these conditions will continue. Nor are these same conditions necessarily
applicable to securities which are not general obligations of the
Commonwealth. Securities issued by specific municipalities, governmental
authorities or similar issuers may be subject to economic risks or
uncertainties peculiar to the issuers of such securities or the sources from
which they are to be paid.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Virginia Quality Trust Units see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
The assets of the Trust will consist of interest-bearing obligations issued by
or on behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Virginia" ) or counties,
municipalities, authorities or political subdivisions thereof (the "
Bonds" ).
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the Bonds to
be deposited in and held in the Trust. However, although no opinion is
expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that: (i) the Bonds
were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is excludible from gross income
for federal income tax purposes and (iii) the interest thereon is exempt from
income tax imposed by Virginia that is applicable to individuals and
corporations (the "Virginia Income Tax" ). The opinion set forth below
does not address the taxation of persons other than full time residents of
Virginia.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, special counsel to the Fund for Virginia
tax matters, under existing law as of the date of this prospectus and based
upon the assumptions set forth above:
The Virginia Quality Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation for
purposes of the Virginia Income Tax and each Unitholder of the Trust will be
treated as the owner of a pro rata portion of each of the assets held by the
Trust and the income of such portion of the Virginia Quality Trust will be
treated as income of the Unitholder for purposes of the Virginia Income Tax.
Income on the Bonds which is exempt from Virginia Income Tax when received by
the Virginia Quality Trust, and which would be exempt from Virginia Income Tax
if received directly by a Unitholder, will retain its status as exempt from
such tax when received by the Trust and distributed to such Unitholder.
Each Unitholder will recognize gain or loss for purposes of the Virginia
Income Tax if the Trustee disposes of a bond (whether by redemption, sale or
otherwise) or if the Unitholder redeems or sells Units of the Trust to the
extent that such a transaction results in a recognized gain or loss to such
Unitholder for federal income tax purposes, except as described in this
paragraph. Virginia has by law provided that all income from certain
tax-exempt obligations issued under the laws of Virginia, including any
profits made from the sale of such Bonds, shall be exempt from all taxation by
Virginia. Although we express no opinion, the Virginia Department of Taxation
has indicated that the gain on the sale of such tax-exempt obligations,
recognized for federal income tax purposes, would not be subject to Virginia
income taxation. Accordingly, any such gain relating to the disposition of any
Bond that would not be subject to Virginia Income Tax if the Bond was held
directly by a Unitholder will retain its tax-exempt status for purposes of the
Virginia Income Tax when the Bond is disposed of by the Virginia Quality Trust
or when the Unitholder is deemed to have disposed of his pro rata portion of
such Bond upon the disposition of his Unit, provided that such gain can be
determined with reasonable certainty and substantiated.
The Virginia Income Tax does not permit a deduction of interest paid on
indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry Units in the Virginia
Quality Trust to the extent that interest income related to the ownership of
Units is exempt from the Virginia Income Tax.
In the case of Unitholders subject to the Virginia Bank Franchise Tax, the
income derived by such a Unitholder from his pro rata portion of the Bonds
held by the Virginia Quality Trust may affect the determination of such
Unitholder's Bank Franchise Tax. Prospective investors subject to the Virginia
Bank Franchise Tax should consult their tax advisors. Chapman and Cutler has
expressed no opinion with respect to taxation under any other provisions of
Virginia law. Ownership of the Units may result in collateral Virginia tax
consequences to certain taxpayers. Prospective investors should consult their
tax advisors as to the applicability of any such collateral consequences.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Semi-
Per Unit Information: Monthly Annual
<S> <C> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit................................. $ 55.24 $ 55.24
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>.............................. $ 2.01 $ 1.54
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 53.23 $ 53.70
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit............................. $ 53.23 $ 53.70
Divided by 12 and 2, respectively......................................... $ 4.44 $ 26.85
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit...................... $ .14785 $ .14916
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>... 5.32% 5.37%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>.................................... 5.31% 5.36%
Estimated Initial Monthly Distribution (May 1996).......................... $ 5.47
Estimated Initial Semi-annual Distribution (May 1996)...................... $ 5.52
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................ $ 4.44 $ 26.85
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>...... $.91 and $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds, respectively, for those portions of the
Virginia Quality Trust under the monthly and semi-annual distribution plans
Record and Computation Dates... TENTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--May and November
Distribution Dates............. TWENTY-FIFTH day of the month as follows: monthly--each month; semi-annual--
May and November commencing May 25, 1996
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.06
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued" Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated Annual
Interest Income per Unit will be increased to $55.24. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $2.24 and $1.75 under the
monthly and semi-annual distribution plans, respectively; and Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."
<F2>Excluding insurance costs. The Estimated Annual Expenses are expected to
fluctuate periodically (see "Trust Administration--Fund Administration and
Expenses--Miscellaneous Expenses" ).
<F3>The Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns are increased
for transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" .
<F4>The Estimated Current Returns are calculated by dividing the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The Estimated
Net Annual Interest Income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities; therefore, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Current Returns indicated above will be realized in the future. The Estimated
Long-Term Returns are calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales
charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of the Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Returns as indicated
above will be realized in the future. The Estimated Current Returns and
Estimated Long-Term Returns are expected to differ because the calculation of
the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the estimated date and amount of
principal returned while the Estimated Current Return calculation includes
only net annual interest income and Public Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders" .
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
VIRGINIA INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST SERIES 70
(IM-IT AND QUALITY MULTI-SERIES 269)
PORTFOLIO As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Rating<F2> Virginia
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Maturity Date of Standard Redemption Quality
Principal<F1> either Bonds Deposited or Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> & Poor's Moody's Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 225,000 Virginia State Resource Authority, Solid Waste Disposal
System Revenue Bonds, Series 1995B (MBIA Insured) 2005 @ 102
5.70% Due 10/1/2015..................................... AAA Aaa 2007 @ 100 S.F. $ 224,816
500,000 Virginia Housing Development Authority, Multi-Family 2006 @ 102
Housing Bonds, Series 1996B 5.95% Due 5/1/2016........ AA+ Aa 2010 @ 100 S.F. 503,435
125,000 City of Richmond, Virginia, General Obligation Public
Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1995B (FGIC 2006 @ 102
Insured) #5.00% Due 1/15/2021......................... AAA Aaa 2017 @ 100 S.F. 112,551
470,000 Virginia College Building Authority (Virginia)
Educational Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Washington and Lee University Project) Series 1994 2004 @ 102
#5.80% Due 1/1/2024..................................... AA Aa 2020 @ 100 S.F. 469,093
250,000 Industrial Development Authority of the City of
Alexandria, Virginia, Pollution Control Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Potomac Electric Project) Series 1994
(MBIA Insured) #5.375% Due 2/15/2024.................. AAA Aaa 2004 @ 102 236,635
450,000 Industrial Development Authority of Fairfax County,
Virginia, Health Care Revenue Bonds (Inova Health
System Project) Series 1996** #6.00% Due 8/15/2026.... AA Aa 2006 @ 102 449,100
500,000 Lynchburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority
(Virginia) Waldon Pond III Revenue Refunding Bonds
(GNMA Mortgage Backed Security Financing) Series 1995A 2005 @ 103
6.20% Due 7/20/2027.................................... AAA N/R 2016 @ 100 S.F. 511,205
500,000 Upper Occoquan Sewage Authority (Virginia) Regional
Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Series 1995A (MBIA 2006 @ 100
Insured) #4.75% Due 7/1/2029.......................... AAA Aaa 2026 @ 100 S.F. 422,260
$ 3,020,000 $ 2,929,095
</TABLE>
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios" .
As of the Date of Deposit: March 29, 1996
(1)All Securities are represented by "regular way" or "when
issued" contracts for the performance of which an irrevocable letter of
credit, obtained from an affiliate of the Trustee, has been deposited with the
Trustee. At the Date of Deposit, Securities may have been delivered to the
Sponsor pursuant to certain of these contracts; the Sponsor has assigned to
the Trustee all of its right, title and interest in and to such Securities.
Contracts to acquire Securities were entered into during the period from
February 1,1996 to March 28,1996. These Securities have expected settlement
dates ranging from March 29,1996 to April 18,1996 (see "Unitholder
Explanations" ).
(2)All ratings are by Standard & Poor's unless otherwise indicated. "*"
indicates that the rating of the Bond is by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
The ratings represent the latest published ratings by the respective ratings
agency or, if not published, represent private letter ratings or those ratings
expected to be published by the respective ratings agency. "Y"
indicates that such rating is contingent upon physical receipt by the
respective ratings agency of a policy of insurance obtained by the issuer of
the bonds involved and issued by the Preinsured Bond Insurer named in the
bond's title. A commitment for insurance in connection with these bonds has
been issued by the Preinsured Bond Insurer named in the bond's title. "
N/R" indicates that the applicable rating service did not provide a rating
for that particular Security. For a brief description of the rating symbols
and their related meanings, see "Other Matters--Description of Securities
Ratings" .
(3)There is shown under this heading the year in which each issue of Bonds is
initially or currently callable and the call price for that year. Each issue
of Bonds continues to be callable at declining prices thereafter (but not
below par value) except for original issue discount bonds which are redeemable
at prices based on the issue price plus the amount of original issue discount
accreted to redemption date plus, if applicable, some premium, the amount of
which will decline in subsequent years. "S.F." indicates a sinking
fund is established with respect to an issue of Bonds. Redemption pursuant to
call provisions generally will, and redemption pursuant to sinking fund
provisions may, occur at times when the redeemed bonds have an offering side
valuation which represents a premium over par. Certain Bonds may be subject to
redemption without premium prior to the date shown pursuant to extraordinary
optional or mandatory redemptions if certain events occur. Single family
mortgage revenue bonds and housing authority bonds are most likely to be
called subject to such provisions, but other bonds may have similar call
features. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, certain bond issuers
have in the past and others may in the future attempt to redeem Bonds prior to
their initially scheduled call dates and at prices which do not include any
premiums. For a general discussion of certain of these events, see "
Unitholder Explanations--Bond Redemptions" . To the extent that the
Securities were deposited in a Trust at a price higher than the price at which
they are redeemed, this will represent a loss of capital when compared with
the original Public Offering Price of the Units. Conversely, to the extent
that the Bonds were acquired at a price lower than the redemption price, this
will represent an increase in capital when compared with the original Public
Offering Price of the Units. Distributions will generally be reduced by the
amount of the income which would otherwise have been paid with respect to
redeemed Securities and there will be distributed to Unitholders the principal
amount and any premium received on such redemption. The Estimated Current
Return and Estimated Long-Term Return in this event may be affected by such
redemptions. For the Federal tax effect on Unitholders of such redemptions and
resultant distributions, see paragraph (2) under "Other Matters--Federal
Tax Status" .
(4)Evaluation of Securities is made on the basis of current offering prices
for the Securities. The offering prices are greater than the current bid
prices of the Securities which is the basis on which Unit value is determined
for purposes of redemption of Units (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Offering Price" ).
(5)Other information regarding the Bonds in each Trust, as of the Date of
Deposit, is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual
Annual Profit Interest Bid Side
Trust Insurance Cost to (Loss) to Income to Evaluation
Cost Sponsor Sponsor Trust of Bonds
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT................ $-- $ 8,556,465 $ 48,216 $ 499,855 $ 8,537,369
California IM-IT..... $-- $ 2,840,998 $ 17,724 $ 167,075 $ 2,835,739
Florida IM-IT........ $-- $ 2,883,676 $ 17,838 $ 166,150 $ 2,878,977
Michigan IM-IT....... $-- $ 2,910,238 $ 34,072 $ 171,094 $ 2,920,440
Minnesota IM-IT...... $-- $ 2,849,460 $ 28,281 $ 162,085 $ 2,854,941
New Jersey IM-IT..... $-- $ 2,909,362 $ 12,121 $ 168,770 $ 2,898,838
Pennsylvania IM-IT... $-- $ 2,888,983 $ 22,993 $ 168,565 $ 2,889,260
Virginia Quality..... $-- $ 2,908,849 $ 20,246 $ 171,273 $ 2,906,445
</TABLE>
The Sponsor may have entered into contracts which hedge interest rate
fluctuations on certain Bonds in certain Portfolios. The cost of any such
contracts and the corresponding gain or loss is included in the Cost to
Sponsor. Certain Securities in the Fund, if any, marked by a double asterisk
(**), have been purchased on a "when, as and if issued" or "
delayed delivery" basis. Interest on these Securities begins accruing to
the benefit of Unitholders on their respective dates of delivery. Delivery is
expected to take place at various dates after the First Settlement Date as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percent of
Trust Aggregate Principal Range of Days Subsequent
Amount to First Settlement Date
<S> <C> <C>
IM-IT................ 6% 7 days
California IM-IT..... 34% 7 days
Florida IM-IT........ 25% 7 to 8 days
Michigan IM-IT....... -- --
Minnesota IM-IT...... -- --
New Jersey IM-IT..... -- --
Pennsylvania IM-IT... -- --
Virginia Quality..... 15% 15 days
</TABLE>
On the Date of Deposit, the offering side evaluations of the Securities in the
IM-IT, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New
Jersey IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and Virginia Quality Trusts were higher than
the bid side evaluations of such Securities by 0.74%, 0.78%, 0.74%, 0.77%,
0.75%, 0.75%, 0.75% and 0.75%, respectively, of the aggregate principal
amounts of such Securities.
"#" indicates that such Bond was issued at an original issue discount.
The tax effect of Bonds issued at an original issue discount is described in
"Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" .
(6)This Bond has been purchased at a deep discount from the par value because
there is little or no stated interest income thereon. Bonds which pay no
interest are normally described as "zero coupon" bonds. Over the life
of bonds purchased at a deep discount the value of such bonds will increase
such that upon maturity the holders of such bonds will receive 100% of the
principal amount thereof. To the extent that zero coupon bonds are sold or
called prior to maturity, there is no guarantee that the value of the proceeds
received therefrom by the Trust will equal or exceed the par value that would
have been obtained at maturity of such zero coupon bonds. Approximately 2% of
the aggregate principal amount of the Securities in each of the IM-IT and
Florida IM-IT Trusts are "zero coupon" bonds.
Underwriting. The Underwriters named below have severally purchased Units in
the following respective amounts from the Sponsor.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IM-IT
Name Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 6,048
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 500
J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, Inc. 501 South Fourth Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202 250
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 250
Principal Financial Securities, Inc. Fountain Place, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 2300, Dallas, Texas 75201 250
R. Seelaus & Co., Inc. The Atrium @ 47 Maple Street, Summit, New Jersey 07901 250
Advest, Inc. 90 State House Square, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 100
Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc. 777 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 100
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
First Miami Securities 20660 West Dixie Highway, North Miami Beach, Florida 33180 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
William R. Hough & Company 100 Second Avenue South, 8th Floor, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 100
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. World Financial Center, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10281 100
Pershing DIV of DLJ Secs Corp. One Pershing Plaza, 7th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07399 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 1 New York Plaza, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10292-2014 100
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 100
Roosevelt & Cross Inc. 20 Exchange Place, New York, New York 10005 100
Southwest Securities Inc. 1201 Elm Street, Suite 4300, Dallas, Texas 75270 100
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated 500 North Broadway, St. Louis, Missouri 63102 100
US Clearing Corp. 26 Broadway, New York, New York 10004 100
B.C. Ziegler and Company 215 North Main Street, West Bend, Wisconsin 53095 100
9,048
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
California
Name Address IM-IT Trust Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,406
Crowell, Weedon & Company One Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90017 100
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 1 New York Plaza, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10292-2014 100
3,006
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Florida IM-IT
Name Address Trust Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,651
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 1 New York Plaza, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10292-2014 100
3,051
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Michigan
IM-IT
Name Trust
Name Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,096
Roney & Co. One Griswold, Detroit, Michigan 48226 250
First of Michigan Corporation 100 Renaissance Center, 26th Floor, Detroit, Michigan 48243 150
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
McDonald Investment Center, 800 Superior Avenue, Suite 2100, Cleveland, Ohio
McDonald & Company Securities, Inc. 44114 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 1 New York Plaza, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10292-2014 100
Smith Barney Inc. 388 Greenwich Street, 23rd Floor, New York, New York 10013 100
3,096
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Minnesota
IM-IT
Name Address Trust
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,626
Dain Bosworth Incorporated Dain Bosworth Plaza, 60 South Sixth Street, P15C, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 100
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
3,026
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
New Jersey
Name Address IM-IT Trust Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,472
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. World Financial Center, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10281 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 1 New York Plaza, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10292-2014 100
Ryan, Beck & Co. 80 Main Street, West Orange, New Jersey 07052 100
R. Seelaus & Co., Inc. The Atrium @ 47 Maple Street, Summit, New Jersey 07901 100
3,072
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trust
Name Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 1,012
Advest, Inc. 90 State House Square, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 250
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 250
Janney Montgomery Scott Inc. 1801 Market Street, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 250
Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc. 111 South Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202 250
Pershing DIV of DLJ Secs Corp. One Pershing Plaza, 7th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07399 250
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
W.H. Newbold's Son & Co. 1500 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 100
Parker/Hunter, Incorporated 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 1 New York Plaza, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10292-2014 100
Roosevelt & Cross Inc. 20 Exchange Place, New York, New York 10005 100
Wheat First Butcher Singer River Front Plaza, 901 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 100
3,062
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Virginia
Quality Trust
Name Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen American Capital Dist., Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,280
Anderson & Strudwick, Inc. 1108 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 100
Davenport & Co. of Virginia Inc. 901 E. Cary Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 100
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 1 New York Plaza, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10292-2014 100
Smith Barney Inc. 388 Greenwich Street, 23rd Floor, New York, New York 10013 100
Wheat First Butcher Singer River Front Plaza, 901 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 100
3,080
</TABLE>
Units may also be sold to broker-dealers and others at prices representing the
per Unit concession or agency commission stated under "Trust
Administration--General--Unit Distribution" . However, resales of Units by
such broker-dealers and others to the public will be made at the Public
Offering Price described in the Prospectus. The Sponsor reserves the right to
reject, in whole or in part, any order for the purchase of Units and the right
to change the amount of the concession or agency commission from time to time.
In addition to any other benefits the Underwriters may realize from the sale
of the Units of the Fund, the Agreement Among Underwriters provides that the
Sponsor will share on a pro rata basis among those Underwriters who underwrite
at least 250 Units 50% of the aggregate gain, if any, represented by the
difference between the Sponsor's cost of the Securities in connection with
their acquisition and the evaluation thereof on the Date of Deposit less
deductions for certain accrued interest and certain other costs. See "
Trust Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation" and
"Portfolio" for the applicable Trust.
Underwriters and broker-dealers of the Trusts, banks and/or others are
eligible to participate in a program in which such firms receive from the
Sponsor a nominal award for each of their representatives who have sold a
minimum number of units of unit investment trusts created by the Sponsor
during a specified time period. In addition, at various times the Sponsor may
implement other programs under which the sales forces of Underwriters,
brokers, dealers, banks and/or others may be eligible to win other nominal
awards for certain sales efforts, or under which the Sponsor will reallow to
any such Underwriters, brokers, dealers, banks and/or others that sponsor
sales contests or recognition programs conforming to criteria established by
the Sponsor, or participate in sales programs sponsored by the Sponsor, an
amount not exceeding the total applicable sales charges on the sales generated
by such persons at the public offering price during such programs. Also, the
Sponsor in its discretion may from time to time pursuant to objective criteria
established by the Sponsor pay fees to qualifying underwriters, brokers,
dealers, banks or others for certain services or activities which are
primarily intended to result in sales of Units of the Trusts. Such payments
are made by the Sponsor out of its own assets, and not out of the assets of
the Trusts. These programs will not change the price Unitholders pay for their
Units or the amount that the Trusts will receive from the Units sold.
Approximately every eighteen months the Sponsor holds a business seminar which
is open to Underwriters that sell units of trusts it sponsors. The Sponsor
pays substantially all costs associated with the seminar, excluding
Underwriter travel costs. Each Underwriter is invited to send a certain number
of representatives based on the gross number of units such firm underwrites
during a designated time period.
FUND ADMINISTRATION AND EXPENSES
Sponsor. Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, is the Sponsor of the Trust. Van Kampen American Capital
Distributors, Inc. is primarily owned by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc., a New
York-based private investment firm. Van Kampen American Capital Distributors,
Inc. management owns a significant minority equity position. Van Kampen
American Capital Distributors, Inc. specializes in the underwriting and
distribution of unit investment trusts and mutual funds with roots in money
management dating back to 1926. The Sponsor is a member of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and has offices at One Parkview Plaza,
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, (708) 684-6000 and 2800 Post Oak Boulevard,
Houston, Texas 77056, (713) 993-0500. It maintains a branch office in
Philadelphia and has regional representatives in Atlanta, Dallas, Los Angeles,
New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Tampa. As of December 31, 1995 the total
stockholders' equity of Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc. was
$123,165,000 (unaudited). (This paragraph relates only to the Sponsor and not
to the Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust
or to any Multi-Series thereof or to any other Underwriter. The information is
included herein only for the purpose of informing investors as to the
financial responsibility of the Sponsor and its ability to carry out its
contractual obligations. More detailed financial information will be made
available by the Sponsor upon request.)
As of December 31, 1995, the Sponsor and its affiliates managed or supervised
approximately $56.0 billion of investment products, of which over $24.8
billion is invested in municipal securities. The Sponsor and its affiliates
managed $44.0 billion of assets, consisting of $22.2 billion for 63 open-end
mutual funds (of which 47 are distributed by Van Kampen American Capital
Distributors, Inc.), $11.4 billion for 38 closed-end funds and $5.6 billion
for 84 institutional accounts. The Sponsor has also deposited approximately
$26 billion of unit investment trusts. All of Van Kampen American Capital's
open-end, closed-end and unit investment trusts are professionally distributed
by leading financial firms nationwide. Based on cumulative assets deposited,
the Sponsor believes that it is the largest sponsor of insured municipal unit
investment trusts, primarily through the success of its Insured Municipals
Income Trust(R)or the IM-IT(R)trust. The Sponsor also provides
surveillance and evaluation services at cost for approximately $13 billion of
unit investment trust assets outstanding. Since 1976, the Sponsor has serviced
over two million investor accounts, opened through retail distribution firms.
If the Sponsor shall fail to perform any of its duties under the Trust
Agreement or become incapable of acting or become bankrupt or its affairs are
taken over by public authorities, then the Trustee may (i) appoint a successor
Sponsor at rates of compensation deemed by the Trustee to be reasonable and
not exceeding amounts prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
(ii) terminate the Trust Agreement and liquidate the Fund as provided therein
or (iii) continue to act as Trustee without terminating the Trust Agreement.
All costs and expenses incurred in creating and establishing the Fund,
including the cost of the initial preparation, printing and execution of the
Trust Agreement and the certificates, legal and accounting expenses,
advertising and selling expenses, expenses of the Trustee, initial evaluation
fees and other out-of-pocket expenses have been borne by the Sponsor at no
cost to the Fund.
Compensation of Sponsor and Evaluator. The Sponsor will not receive any fees
in connection with its activities relating to the Fund. However, American
Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen American Capital
Investment Advisory Corp., which is an affiliate corporation of the Sponsor,
will receive an annual supervisory fee as indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information" for providing portfolio supervisory
services for the Fund. Such fee (which is based on the number of Units
outstanding in each Trust on January 1 of each year) may exceed the actual
costs of providing such supervisory services for this Fund, but at no time
will the total amount received for portfolio supervisory services rendered to
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 1 and subsequent series and to any other unit investment trusts
sponsored by the Sponsor for which the Evaluator provides portfolio
supervisory services in any calendar year exceed the aggregate cost to the
Evaluator of supplying such services in such year. In addition, the Evaluator
shall receive an annual evaluation fee as indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information" for regularly evaluating each Trust's
portfolio. Both of the foregoing fees may be increased without approval of the
Unitholders by amounts not exceeding proportionate increases under the
category "All Services Less Rent of Shelter" in the Consumer Price
Index published by the United States Department of Labor or, if such category
is no longer published, in a comparable category. The Sponsor and the
Underwriters will receive sales commissions and may realize other profits (or
losses) in connection with the sale of Units and the deposit of the Securities
as described under "General--Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation"
below.
Trustee. The Trustee is The Bank of New York, a trust company organized under
the laws of New York. The Bank of New York has its offices at 101 Barclay
Street, New York, New York 10286 (800) 221-7668. The Bank of New York is
subject to supervision and examination by the Superintendent of Banks of the
State of New York and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to
the extent permitted by law.
The duties of the Trustee are primarily ministerial in nature. It did not
participate in the selection of Bonds for the portfolios of any of the Trusts.
In accordance with the Trust Agreement, the Trustee shall keep proper books of
record and account of all transactions at its office for the Fund. Such
records shall include the name and address of, and the certificates issued by
the Fund to, every Unitholder of the Fund. Such books and records shall be
open to inspection by any Unitholder at all reasonable times during the usual
business hours. The Trustee shall make such annual or other reports as may
from time to time be required under any applicable state or Federal statute,
rule or regulation (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Reports
Provided" ). The Trustee is required to keep a certified copy or duplicate
original of the Trust Agreement on file in its office available for inspection
at all reasonable times during the usual business hours by any Unitholder,
together with a current list of the Securities held in the Fund.
Under the Trust Agreement, the Trustee or any successor trustee may resign and
be discharged of the trusts created by the Trust Agreement by executing an
instrument in writing and filing the same with the Sponsor. The Trustee or
successor trustee must mail a copy of the notice of resignation to all Fund
Unitholders then of record, not less than 60 days before the date specified in
such notice when such resignation is to take effect. The Sponsor upon
receiving notice of such resignation is obligated to appoint a successor
trustee promptly. If, upon such resignation, no successor trustee has been
appointed and has accepted the appointment within 30 days after notification,
the retiring Trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the
appointment of a successor. The Sponsor may remove the Trustee and appoint a
successor trustee as provided in the Trust Agreement at any time with or
without cause. Notice of such removal and appointment shall be mailed to each
Unitholder by the Sponsor. Upon execution of a written acceptance of such
appointment by such successor trustee, all the rights, powers, duties and
obligations of the original trustee shall vest in the successor. The
resignation or removal of a Trustee becomes effective only when the successor
trustee accepts its appointment as such or when a court of competent
jurisdiction appoints a successor trustee.
Any corporation into which a Trustee may be merged or with which it may be
consolidated, or any corporation resulting from any merger or consolidation to
which a Trustee shall be a party, shall be the successor trustee. The Trustee
must be a banking corporation organized under the laws of the United States or
any state and having at all times an aggregate capital, surplus and undivided
profits of not less than $5,000,000.
Trustee's Fee. For its services the Trustee will receive a fee based on the
aggregate outstanding principal amount of Securities in each Trust as of the
opening of business on January 2 and July 2 of each year as set forth under
"Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust. During the first year
the Trustee may agree to reduce its fee (and to the extent necessary pay
miscellaneous expenses of a Trust) as stated under "Per Unit
Information" for the applicable Trust. After the first year such fee will
be computed at $.51 per $1,000 principal amount of Securities for that portion
of each Trust under the semi-annual distribution plan and $.91 per $1,000
principal amount of Securities for that portion of each Trust under the
monthly distribution plan. Based on the size of the Trust on the Date of
Deposit and assuming all Unitholders had chosen the semi-annual distribution
plan, the Trustee's estimated annual fees for ordinary recurring services
would initially amount to $4,621, $1,502, $1,545, $1,581, $1,550, $1,540,
$1,543 and $1,540 for the IM-IT, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan
IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and Virginia
Quality Trusts, respectively. Assuming in the alternative that all Unitholders
had elected the monthly distribution plan such fees would have initially
amount to $8,245, $2,680, $2,757, $2,821, $2,766, $2,748, $2,753 and $2,748
for the above mentioned Trusts, respectively. The Trustee's fees are payable
monthly on or before the twenty-fifth day of each month from the Interest
Account of each Trust to the extent funds are available and then from the
Principal Account of each Trust, with such payments being based on each
Trust's portion of such expenses. Since the Trustee has the use of the funds
being held in the Principal and Interest Accounts for future distributions,
payment of expenses and redemptions and since such Accounts are non-interest
bearing to Unitholders, the Trustee benefits thereby. Part of the Trustee's
compensation for its services to each Trust is expected to result from the use
of these funds. Such fees may be increased without approval of the Unitholders
by amounts not exceeding proportionate increases under the category "All
Services Less Rent of Shelter" in the Consumer Price Index published by
the United States Department of Labor or, if such category is no longer
published, in a comparable category. The Trustee's fees will not be increased
in future years in order to make up any reduction in the Trustee's fees
described under "Per Unit Information" for the applicable Trust. For a
discussion of the services rendered by the Trustee pursuant to its obligations
under the Trust Agreement, see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Reports Provided" and "Trustee" above.
Portfolio Administration. The Trustee is empowered to sell, for the purpose
of redeeming Units tendered by any Unitholder, and for the payment of expenses
for which funds may not be available, such of the Bonds designated by the
Evaluator as the Trustee in its sole discretion may deem necessary. The
Evaluator, in designating such Securities, will consider a variety of factors,
including (a) interest rates, (b) market value and (c) marketability. The
Sponsor, in connection with the Quality Trusts, may direct the Trustee to
dispose of Securities upon default in payment of principal or interest,
institution of certain legal proceedings, default under other documents
adversely affecting debt service, default in payment of principal or interest
on other obligations of the same issuer, decline in projected income pledged
for debt service on revenue bonds or decline in price or the occurrence of
other market or credit factors, including advance refunding (i.e., the
issuance of refunding securities and the deposit of the proceeds thereof in
trust or escrow to retire the refunded securities on their respective
redemption dates), so that in the opinion of the Sponsor the retention of such
Securities would be detrimental to the interest of the Unitholders. In
connection with the Insured Trusts to the extent that Bonds are sold which are
current in payment of principal and interest in order to meet redemption
requests and defaulted Bonds are retained in the portfolio in order to
preserve the related insurance protection applicable to said Bonds, the
overall quality of the Bonds remaining in such Trust's portfolio will tend to
diminish. Except as described in this section and in certain other unusual
circumstances for which it is determined by the Trustee to be in the best
interests of the Unitholders or if there is no alternative, the Trustee is not
empowered to sell Bonds from an Insured Trust which are in default in payment
of principal or interest or in significant risk of such default and for which
value has been attributed for the insurance obtained by such Insured Trust.
Because of such restrictions on the Trustee under certain circumstances, the
Sponsor may seek a full or partial suspension of the right of Unitholders to
redeem their Units in an Insured Trust. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering-- Redemption of Units" . The Sponsor is
empowered, but not obligated, to direct the Trustee to dispose of Bonds in the
event of an advanced refunding.
The Sponsor is required to instruct the Trustee to reject any offer made by an
issuer of any of the Securities to issue new obligations in exchange or
substitution for any Security pursuant to a refunding or refinancing plan,
except that the Sponsor may instruct the Trustee to accept or reject such an
offer or to take any other action with respect thereto as the Sponsor may deem
proper if (1) the issuer is in default with respect to such Security or (2) in
the written opinion of the Sponsor the issuer will probably default with
respect to such Security in the reasonably foreseeable future. Any obligation
so received in exchange or substitution will be held by the Trustee subject to
the terms and conditions of the Trust Agreement to the same extent as
Securities originally deposited thereunder. Within five days after the deposit
of obligations in exchange or substitution for underlying Securities, the
Trustee is required to give notice thereof to each Unitholder of the Trust
thereby affected, identifying the Securities eliminated and the Securities
substituted therefor. Except as stated herein and under "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts" regarding the
substitution of Replacement Bonds for Failed Bonds, the acquisition by the
Fund of any securities other than the Securities initially deposited is not
permitted.
If any default in the payment of principal or interest on any Security occurs
and no provision for payment is made therefor within 30 days, the Trustee is
required to notify the Sponsor thereof. If the Sponsor fails to instruct the
Trustee to sell or to hold such Security within 30 days after notification by
the Trustee to the Sponsor of such default, the Trustee may in its discretion
sell the defaulted Security and not be liable for any depreciation or loss
thereby incurred.
Sponsor Purchases of Units. The Trustee shall notify the Sponsor of any tender
of Units for redemption. If the Sponsor's bid in the secondary market at that
time equals or exceeds the Redemption Price per Unit, it may purchase such
Units by notifying the Trustee before the close of business on the second
succeeding business day and by making payment therefor to the Unitholder not
later than the day on which the Units would otherwise have been redeemed by
the Trustee. Units held by the Sponsor may be tendered to the Trustee for
redemption as any other Units.
The offering price of any Units acquired by the Sponsor will be in accord with
the Public Offering Price described in the then currently effective prospectus
describing such Units. Any profit resulting from the resale of such Units will
belong to the Sponsor which likewise will bear any loss resulting from a lower
offering or Redemption Price subsequent to its acquisition of such Units.
Insurance Premiums. The cost of the portfolio insurance obtained by the
respective Trusts, if any, is that amount shown in footnote (5) in "Notes
to Portfolios" , so long as such Trust retains the Bonds. Premiums, which
are obligations of each Insured Trust, are payable monthly by the Trustee on
behalf of the respective Trust. As Bonds in the portfolio of an Insured Trust
are redeemed by their respective issuers or are sold by the Trustee, the
amount of the premium will be reduced in respect of those Bonds no longer
owned by and held in such Trust. If the Trustee exercises the right to obtain
permanent insurance, the premiums payable for such permanent insurance will be
paid solely from the proceeds of the sale of the related Bonds. The premiums
for such permanent insurance with respect to each Bond will decline over the
life of the Bond. A Trust does not incur any expense for Preinsured Bond
insurance, since the premium or premiums for such insurance have been paid by
the issuer or the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Preinsured Bonds in a
Trust. Preinsured Bonds are not additionally insured by an Insured Trust.
Miscellaneous Expenses. The following additional charges are or may be
incurred by the Trusts: (a) fees of the Trustee for extraordinary services,
(b) expenses of the Trustee (including legal and auditing expenses) and of
counsel designated by the Sponsor, (c) various governmental charges, (d)
expenses and costs of any action taken by the Trustee to protect the Trusts
and the rights and interests of Unitholders, (e) indemnification of the
Trustee for any loss, liability or expenses incurred by it in the
administration of the Fund without negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct
on its part, (f) any special custodial fees payable in connection with the
sale of any of the Bonds in a Trust, (g) expenditures incurred in contacting
Unitholders upon termination of the Trusts and (h) costs incurred to reimburse
the Trustee for advancing funds to the Trusts to meet scheduled distributions
(which costs may be adjusted periodically in response to fluctuations in
short-term interest rates).
The fees and expenses set forth herein are payable out of the Trusts. When
such fees and expenses are paid by or owing to the Trustee, they are secured
by a lien on the portfolio or portfolios of the applicable Trust or Trusts. If
the balances in the Interest and Principal Accounts are insufficient to
provide for amounts payable by the Fund, the Trustee has the power to sell
Securities to pay such amounts.
GENERAL
Amendment or Termination. The Sponsor and the Trustee have the power to amend
the Trust Agreement without the consent of any of the Unitholders when such an
amendment is (a) to cure an ambiguity or to correct or supplement any
provision of the Trust Agreement which may be defective or inconsistent with
any other provision contained therein or (b) to make such other provisions as
shall not adversely affect the interest of the Unitholders (as determined in
good faith by the Sponsor and the Trustee), provided that the Trust Agreement
may not be amended to increase the number of Units issuable thereunder or to
permit the deposit or acquisition of securities either in addition to or in
substitution for any of the Securities initially deposited in the Fund, except
for the substitution of certain refunding securities for such Securities. In
the event of any amendment, the Trustee is obligated to notify promptly all
Unitholders of the substance of such amendment.
A Trust may be terminated at any time by consent of Unitholders of 51% of the
Units of such Trust then outstanding or by the Trustee when the value of such
Trust, as shown by any semi-annual evaluation, is less than that indicated
under "Summary of Essential Financial Information" . A Trust will be
liquidated by the Trustee in the event that a sufficient number of Units not
yet sold are tendered for redemption by the Underwriters, including the
Sponsor, so that the net worth of such Trust would be reduced to less than 40%
of the initial principal amount of such Trust. If a Trust is liquidated
because of the redemption of unsold Units by the Underwriters, the Sponsor
will refund to each purchaser of Units the entire sales charge paid by such
purchaser. The Trust Agreement provides that each Trust shall terminate upon
the redemption, sale or other disposition of the last Security held in such
Trust, but in no event shall it continue beyond the end of the year preceding
the fiftieth anniversary of the Trust Agreement in the case of an IM-IT or a
State Trust, or beyond the end of the year preceding the twentieth anniversary
of the Trust Agreement in the case of IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT
Intermediate and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts. In the event of termination
of the Fund or any Trust, written notice thereof will be sent by the Trustee
to each Unitholder of such Trust at his address appearing on the registration
books of the Fund maintained by the Trustee. Within a reasonable time
thereafter the Trustee shall liquidate any Securities then held in such Trust
and shall deduct from the funds of such Trust any accrued costs, expenses or
indemnities provided by the Trust Agreement, including estimated compensation
of the Trustee and costs of liquidation and any amounts required as a reserve
to provide for payment of any applicable taxes or other governmental charges.
The sale of Securities in the Trust upon termination may result in a lower
amount than might otherwise be realized if such sale were not required at such
time. For this reason, among others, the amount realized by a Unitholder upon
termination may be less than the principal amount or par amount of Securities
represented by the Units held by such Unitholder. The Trustee shall then
distribute to each Unitholder his share of the balance of the Interest and
Principal Accounts. With such distribution the Unitholder shall be furnished a
final distribution statement of the amount distributable. At such time as the
Trustee in its sole discretion shall determine that any amounts held in
reserve are no longer necessary, it shall make distribution thereof to
Unitholders in the same manner.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with final distributions to
Unitholders of an Insured Trust, it should be noted that because the portfolio
insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is applicable only while Bonds so
insured are held by such Trust, the price to be received by such Trust upon
the disposition of any such Bond which is in default, by reason of nonpayment
of principal or interest, will not reflect any value based on such insurance.
Therefore, in connection with any liquidation, it shall not be necessary for
the Trustee to, and the Trustee does not currently intend to, dispose of any
Bond or Bonds if retention of such Bond or Bonds, until due, shall be deemed
to be in the best interest of Unitholders, including, but not limited to,
situations in which a Bond or Bonds so insured are in default and situations
in which a Bond or Bonds so insured have deteriorated market prices resulting
from a significant risk of default. Since the Preinsured Bonds will reflect
the value of the related insurance, it is the present intention of the Sponsor
not to direct the Trustee to hold any of such Preinsured Bonds after the date
of termination. All proceeds received, less applicable expenses, from
insurance on defaulted Bonds not disposed of at the date of termination will
ultimately be distributed to Unitholders of record as of such date of
termination as soon as practicable after the date such defaulted Bond or Bonds
become due and applicable insurance proceeds have been received by the Trustee.
Limitation on Liabilities. The Sponsor, the Evaluator and the Trustee shall be
under no liability to Unitholders for taking any action or for refraining from
taking any action in good faith pursuant to the Trust Agreement, or for errors
in judgment, but shall be liable only for their own willful misfeasance, bad
faith or gross negligence in the performance of their duties or by reason of
their reckless disregard of their obligations and duties hereunder. The
Trustee shall not be liable for depreciation or loss incurred by reason of the
sale by the Trustee of any of the Securities. In the event of the failure of
the Sponsor to act under the Trust Agreement, the Trustee may act thereunder
and shall not be liable for any action taken by it in good faith under the
Trust Agreement.
The Trustee shall not be liable for any taxes or other governmental charges
imposed upon or in respect of the Securities or upon the interest thereon or
upon it as Trustee under the Trust Agreement or upon or in respect of the Fund
which the Trustee may be required to pay under any present or future law of
the United States of America or of any other taxing authority having
jurisdiction. In addition, the Trust Agreement contains other customary
provisions limiting the liability of the Trustee.
The Trustee, Sponsor and Unitholders may rely on any evaluation furnished by
the Evaluator and shall have no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
Determinations by the Evaluator under the Trust Agreement shall be made in
good faith upon the basis of the best information available to it; provided,
however, that the Evaluator shall be under no liability to the Trustee,
Sponsor or Unitholders for errors in judgment. This provision shall not
protect the Evaluator in any case of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross
negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties.
Unit Distribution. During the initial offering period, Units will be
distributed to the public by Underwriters, broker-dealers and others (see
"Underwriting" ) at the Public Offering Price, plus interest accrued but
unpaid from the First Settlement Date to the date of settlement as described
above under "Unitholder Explanations--Accrued Interest--Accrued
Interest" . Upon the completion of the initial offering, Units repurchased
in the secondary market, if any, may be offered by this Prospectus at the
secondary Public Offering Price plus interest accrued to the date of
settlement in the manner described.
The Sponsor intends to qualify the Units for sale in a number of states.
Broker-dealers or others will be allowed a concession or agency commission in
connection with the distribution of Units during the initial offering period
of in the case of an IM-IT or a State Trust $30.00 per Unit for less than 100
Units, $36.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $38.00
per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $39.00 per Unit for
any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $39.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 1,000 or more Units, provided that such Units are acquired
either from the Sponsor (in the case of dealer transactions) or through the
Sponsor (in the case of transactions involving brokers or others). The
increased concession or agency commission is a result of the discount given to
purchasers for quantity purchases. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--General" . Certain commercial banks are making Units of the Fund
available to their customers on an agency basis. A portion of the sales charge
paid by these customers (equal to the agency commission referred to above) is
retained by or remitted to the banks. Under the Glass-Steagall Act, banks are
prohibited from underwriting Units of the Fund; however, the Glass-Steagall
Act does permit certain agency transactions and the banking regulators have
not indicated that these particular agency transactions are not permitted
under such Act. In addition, state securities laws on this issue may differ
from the interpretations of federal law expressed herein and banks and
financial institutions may be required to register as dealers pursuant to
state law. Any quantity discount (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--General" ) provided to investors will be borne by the selling
dealer or agent. For secondary market transactions, such concession or agency
commission will amount to 70% of the applicable sales charge as determined
using the table found in "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering" .
Except as stated hereinafter, the minimum purchase requirement in the initial
offering period and in the secondary market is one Unit. In connection with
fully disclosed transactions with the Sponsor, the minimum purchase
requirement will be that number of Units set forth in the contract between the
Sponsor and the related broker or agent.
The Sponsor reserves the right to reject, in whole or in part, any order for
the purchase of Units and to change the amount of the concession or agency
commission to dealers and others from time to time. See "Underwriting" .
Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation. The Underwriters will receive a gross
sales commission equal to that percentage of the Public Offering Price of the
Units as indicated under "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Offering Price" less any reduced sales charges for quantity
purchases as described under "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--General".
The Sponsor will receive from the Underwriters the excess of such gross sales
commission over $35.00, $29.00, $27.00, $12.00 and $35.00 per Unit of any
Quality, IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, IM-IT Short Intermediate
and other Insured Trusts, respectively, as of the Date of Deposit. In
connection with quantity sales to purchasers of any IM-IT or State Trust the
Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor commissions totalling $37.00 per
Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $39.00 per Unit for any
single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $40.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $39.00 per Unit for any single transaction
of 1,000 or more Units. A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. ("Edwards" ), which
acts as a Managing Underwriter of Units of the various series of the IM-IT,
will receive from the Sponsor reimbursement for certain costs and further
compensation in the amount of $5.00 for each Unit of the IM-IT it underwrites.
Also, if Principal Financial Securities, Inc. commits (on the Date of Deposit)
to underwrite a total of 4,000 or more Units of this series of the IM-IT, any
other series of the IM-IT and/or any series of Texas Insured Municipals Income
Trust during any calendar month, then Principal Financial Securities, Inc.
will receive an additional $1.00 per Unit for each of the Units of such Trust
it commits to underwrite in said month. Also, the Sponsor will receive from
the Managing Underwriters of the California IM-IT Trust (who underwrite 15% of
the respective Trusts or 1,000 Units, whichever is greater) the excess of such
gross sales commission over $38.00 per Unit of the respective trusts, as of
the Date of Deposit. Also, any such Managing Underwriter that sells a total of
25% or 1,500 Units, whichever is greater, of any California IM-IT Trust will
receive an additional $2.00 per each such Unit. In addition, the Sponsor
will receive from the Managing Underwriters of the Michigan IM-IT Trust (who
underwrite 15% of the Trust involved or 1,000 Units of such Trust, whichever
is greater) the excess of such gross sales commission over $38.00 per Unit of
any such Trust, as of the Date of Deposit. Also, any such Managing Underwriter
that sells a total of 25% or 1,500 Units, whichever is greater, of any
individual Michigan IM-IT Trust will receive an additional $2.00 per each such
Unit. In connection with quantity sales to purchasers of any Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trust the Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor commissions
totalling $35.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units,
$36.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 units, $37.00 per
Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $38.00 per Unit for
any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units. In addition, any Underwriter
that sells a total of 25% or 1,500 Units, whichever is greater, of any
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust will receive an additional $2.00 per each such Unit.
See "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--General." Further, each
Underwriter who underwrites 1,000 or more Units in any Trust will receive
additional compensation from the Sponsor of $1.00 for each Unit it
underwrites. In addition, the Sponsor and certain of the Underwriters will
realize a profit or the Sponsor will sustain a loss, as the case may be, as a
result of the difference between the price paid for the Securities by the
Sponsor and the cost of such Securities to a Trust (which is based on the
determination by Interactive Data Corporation of the aggregate offering price
of the underlying Securities in such Trust on the Date of Deposit). See "
Underwriting" and "Portfolio" for the applicable Trust and "
Notes to Portfolios" . The Sponsor and the Underwriters may also realize
profits or sustain losses with respect to Securities deposited in each Trust
which were acquired by the Sponsor from underwriting syndicates of which they
were members. The Sponsor has participated as sole underwriter or as manager
or as a member of the underwriting syndicates from which none of the aggregate
principal amount of the Securities in the portfolios of the Fund were
acquired. The Underwriters may further realize additional profit or loss
during the initial offering period as a result of the possible fluctuations in
the market value of the Securities in each Trust after the Date of Deposit,
since all proceeds received from purchasers of Units (excluding dealer
concessions or agency commissions allowed, if any) will be retained by the
Underwriters. Affiliates of an Underwriter are entitled to the same dealer
concessions or agency commissions that are available to the Underwriter.
As stated under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Market for
Units" , the Sponsor intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may,
maintain a secondary market for the Units of the Fund. In so maintaining a
market, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses in
the amount of any difference between the price at which Units are purchased
and the price at which Units are resold (which price is based on the bid
prices of the Securities in such Trust and includes a sales charge). In
addition, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses
resulting from a redemption of such repurchased Units at a price above or
below the purchase price for such Units, respectively.
OTHER MATTERS
Legal Opinions. The legality of the Units offered hereby and certain matters
relating to Federal, Florida, Minnesota and Virginia tax law have been passed
upon by Chapman and Cutler, 111 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603,
as counsel for the Sponsor. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has acted as
special counsel to the Fund for California tax matters. Miller, Canfield,
Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. has acted as special counsel to the Fund for
Michigan tax matters. Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch has acted as special
counsel to the Fund for New Jersey tax matters. Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul has
acted as special counsel to the Fund for Pennsylvania tax matters. Tanner
Propp LLP has acted as counsel for the Trustee and as special counsel to the
Fund for New York tax matters. None of the special counsel for the Fund has
expressed any opinion regarding the completeness or materiality of any matters
contained in this Prospectus other than the tax opinion set forth under "
Tax Status" relating to the Trust for which it has provided an opinion.
Independent Certified Public Accountants. The statements of condition and the
related securities portfolios at the Date of Deposit included in this
Prospectus have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent certified
public accountants, as set forth in their report in this prospectus, and are
included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
FEDERAL TAX STATUS
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, under existing
law:
(1)Each Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation for Federal
income tax purposes and interest and accrued original issue discount on Bonds
which is excludable from gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(the "Code" ) will retain its status when distributed to Unitholders;
however such interest may be taken into account in computing the alternative
minimum tax, an additional tax on branches of foreign corporations and the
environmental tax (the "Superfund Tax" ), as noted below;
(2)Each Unitholder is considered to be the owner of a pro rata portion of the
respective Trust under subpart E, subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code and
will have a taxable event when such Trust disposes of a Bond, or when the
Unitholder redeems or sells his Units. Unitholders must reduce the tax basis
of their Units for their share of accrued interest received by the respective
Trust, if any, on Bonds delivered after the Unitholders pay for their Units to
the extent that such interest accrued on such Bonds during the period from the
Unitholder's settlement date to the date such Bonds are delivered to the
respective Trust and, consequently, such Unitholders may have an increase in
taxable gain or reduction in capital loss upon the disposition of such Units.
Gain or loss upon the sale or redemption of Units is measured by comparing the
proceeds of such sale or redemption with the adjusted basis of the Units. If
the Trustee disposes of Bonds (whether by sale, payment on maturity,
redemption or otherwise), gain or loss is recognized to the Unitholder. The
amount of any such gain or loss is measured by comparing the Unitholder's pro
rata share of the total proceeds from such disposition with the Unitholder's
basis for his or her fractional interest in the asset disposed of. In the case
of a Unitholder who purchases Units, such basis (before adjustment for earned
original issue discount and amortized bond premium, if any) is determined by
apportioning the cost of the Units among each of the Trust assets ratably
according to value as of the valuation date nearest the date of acquisition of
the Units. The tax basis reduction requirements of the Code relating to
amortization of bond premium may, under some circumstances, result in the
Unitholder realizing a taxable gain when his Units are sold or redeemed for an
amount less than or equal to his original cost;
(3)Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy or policies dated the Date of
Deposit, issued to an Insured Trust by AMBAC Indemnity, Financial Guaranty or
a combination thereof with respect to the Bonds which represent maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations provided
that, at the time such policies are purchased, the amounts paid for such
policies are reasonable, customary and consistent with the reasonable
expectation that the issuer of the obligations, rather than the insurer, will
pay debt service on the obligations; and
(4)Any proceeds paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of Bonds
which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee
will be excludable from Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as,
such interest would have been excludable if paid in the normal course by the
issuer of the defaulted obligations provided that, at the time such policies
are purchased, the amounts paid for such policies are reasonable, customary
and consistent with the reasonable expectation that the issuer of the
obligations, rather than the insurer, will pay debt service on the obligations.
Sections 1288 and 1272 of the Code provide a complex set of rules governing
the accrual of original issue discount. These rules provide that original
issue discount accrues either on the basis of a constant compound interest
rate or ratably over the term of the Bond, depending on the date the Bond was
issued. In addition, special rules apply if the purchase price of a Bond
exceeds the original issue price plus the amount of original issue discount
which would have previously accrued based upon its issue price (its "
adjusted issue price" ) to prior owners. The application of these rules
will also vary depending on the value of the Bond on the date a Unitholder
acquires his Units and the price the Unitholder pays for his Units.
Unitholders should consult with their tax advisers regarding these rules and
their application.
"The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993" (the "Tax Act" )
subjects tax-exempt bonds to the market discount rules of the Code effective
for bonds purchased after April 30, 1993. In general, market discount is the
amount (if any) by which the stated redemption price at maturity exceeds an
investor's purchase price (except to the extent that such difference, if any,
is attributable to original issue discount not yet accrued), subject to a
statutory de minimis rule. Market discount can arise based on the price a
Trust pays for Bonds or the price a Unitholder pays for his or her Units.
Under the Tax Act, accretion of market discount is taxable as ordinary income;
under prior law the accretion had been treated as capital gain. Market
discount that accretes while a Trust holds a Bond would be recognized as
ordinary income by the Unitholders when principal payments are received on the
Bond, upon sale or at redemption (including early redemption), or upon the
sale or redemption of his or her Units, unless a Unitholder elects to include
market discount in taxable income as it accrues. The market discount rules are
complex and Unitholders should consult their tax advisers regarding these
rules and their application.
In the case of certain corporations, the alternative minimum tax and the
Superfund Tax for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986 depends upon
the corporation's alternative minimum taxable income, which is the
corporation's taxable income with certain adjustments. One of the adjustment
items used in computing the alternative minimum taxable income and the
Superfund Tax of a corporation (other than an S Corporation, Regulated
Investment Company, Real Estate Investment Trust, or REMIC) is an amount equal
to 75% of the excess of such corporation's "adjusted current earnings"
over an amount equal to its alternative minimum taxable income (before such
adjustment item and the alternative tax net operating loss deduction). "
Adjusted current earnings" includes all tax exempt interest, including
interest on all of the Bonds in the Fund. Under the provisions of Section 884
of the Code, a branch profits tax is levied on the "effectively connected
earnings and profits" of certain foreign corporations which include
tax-exempt interest such as interest on the Bonds in the Trust. Unitholders
should consult their tax advisers with respect to the particular tax
consequences to them including the corporate alternative minimum tax, the
Superfund Tax and the branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code.
Counsel for the Sponsor has also advised that under Section 265 of the Code,
interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry Units of a
Trust is not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. The Internal Revenue
Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need not be directly
traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units (however, these rules generally
do not apply to interest paid on indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve
a personal residence). Also, under Section 265 of the Code, certain financial
institutions that acquire Units would generally not be able to deduct any of
the interest expense attributable to ownership of such Units. On December 7,
1995, the U.S. Treasury Department released proposed legislation that, if
enacted, would generally extend the financial institution rules to all
corporations, effective for obligations acquired after the date of
announcement. Investors with questions regarding this issue should consult
with their tax advisers.
In the case of certain of the Bonds in the Fund, the opinions of bond counsel
indicate that interest on such Bonds received by a "substantial user"
of the facilities being financed with the proceeds of these Bonds, or persons
related thereto, for periods while such Bonds are held by such a user or
related person, will not be excludible from Federal gross income, although
interest on such Bonds received by others would be excludible from Federal
gross income. "Substantial user" and "related person" are
defined under the Code and U.S. Treasury Regulations. Any person who believes
that he or she may be a "substantial user" or a "related
person" as so defined should contact his or her tax adviser.
In the opinion of Tanner Propp LLP, special counsel to the Fund for New York
tax matters, under existing law, the Fund and each Trust are not associations
taxable as corporations and the income of each Trust will be treated as the
income of the Unitholders under the income tax laws of the State and City of
New York.
All statements of law in the Prospectus concerning exclusion from gross income
for Federal, state or other tax purposes are the opinions of counsel and are
to be so construed.
At the respective times of issuance of the Bonds, opinions relating to the
validity thereof and to the exclusion of interest thereon from Federal gross
income are rendered by bond counsel to the respective issuing authorities.
Neither the Sponsor nor Chapman and Cutler has made any special review for the
Fund of the proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds or of the basis
for such opinions.
In the case of corporations, the alternative tax rate applicable to long-term
capital gains is 35%, effective for long-term capital gains realized in
taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1993. For taxpayers other than
corporations, net capital gains are subject to a maximum marginal stated tax
rate of 28%. However, it should be noted that legislative proposals are
introduced from time to time that affect tax rates and could affect relative
differences at which ordinary income and capital gains are taxed. Under the
Code, taxpayers must disclose to the Internal Revenue Service the amount of
tax-exempt interest earned during the year.
Section 86 of the Code, in general, provides that 50% of Social Security
benefits are includible in gross income to the extent that the sum of "
modified adjusted gross income" plus 50% of the Social Security benefits
received exceeds a "base amount" . The base amount is $25,000 for
unmarried taxpayers, $32,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return and
zero for married taxpayers who do not live apart at all times during the
taxable year and who file separate returns. Modified adjusted gross income is
adjusted gross income determined without regard to certain otherwise allowable
deductions and exclusions from gross income and by including tax-exempt
interest. To the extent that Social Security benefits are includible in gross
income, they will be treated as any other item of gross income.
In addition, under the Tax Act, for taxable years beginning after December 31,
1993, up to 85% of Social Security benefits are includible in gross income to
the extent that the sum of "modified adjusted gross income" plus 50%
of Social Security benefits received exceeds an "adjusted base amount."
The adjusted base amount is $34,000 for unmarried taxpayers, $44,000 for
married taxpayers filing a joint return, and zero for married taxpayers who do
not live apart at all times during the taxable year and who file separate
returns.
Although tax-exempt interest is included in modified adjusted gross income
solely for the purpose of determining what portion, if any, of Social Security
benefits will be included in gross income, no tax-exempt interest, including
that received from a Trust, will be subject to tax. A taxpayer whose adjusted
gross income already exceeds the base amount or the adjusted base amount must
include 50% or 85%, respectively, of his Social Security benefits in gross
income whether or not he receives any tax-exempt interest. A taxpayer whose
modified adjusted gross income (after inclusion of tax-exempt interest) does
not exceed the base amount need not include any Social Security benefits in
gross income.
Ownership of the Units may result in collateral federal income tax
consequences to certain taxpayers, including, without limitation, corporations
subject to either the environmental tax or the branch profits tax, financial
institutions, certain insurance companies, certain S corporations, individual
recipients of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits and taxpayers
who may be deemed to have incurred (or continued) indebtedness to purchase or
carry tax-exempt obligations. Prospective investors should consult their tax
advisors as to the applicability of any collateral consequences. On December
7, 1995, the U.S. Treasury Department released proposed legislation that, if
adopted, could affect the United States federal income taxation of non-United
States Unitholders and the portion of the Trust's income allocable to
non-United States Unitholders.
For a discussion of the state tax status of income earned on Units of a Trust,
see "Tax Status" for the applicable Trust. Except as noted therein,
the exemption of interest on state and local obligations for Federal income
tax purposes discussed above does not necessarily result in exemption under
the income or other tax laws of any State or City. The laws of the several
States vary with respect to the taxation of such obligations.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS
Standard & Poor's, A Division of the McGraw-Hill Companies. A Standard &
Poor's corporate or municipal bond rating is a current assessment of the
creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific debt obligation.
This assessment of creditworthiness may take into consideration obligors such
as guarantors, insurers or lessees.
The bond rating is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a security,
inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price.
The ratings are based on current information furnished to Standard & Poor's by
the issuer and obtained by Standard & Poor's from other sources it considers
reliable. The ratings may be changed, suspended or withdrawn as a result of
changes in, or unavailability of, such information.
The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations:
I. Likelihood of default--capacity and willingness of the obligor as to the
timely payment of interest and repayment of principal in accordance with the
terms of the obligation.
II. Nature of and provisions of the obligation.
III. Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the
event of bankruptcy, reorganization or other arrangements under the laws of
bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights.
AAA--This is the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's to a debt
obligation and indicates an extremely strong capacity to pay principal and
interest.
AA--Bonds rated AA also qualify as high-quality debt obligations. Capacity to
pay principal and interest is very strong, and in the majority of instances
they differ from AAA issues only in small degree.
A--Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay principal and interest,
although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes
in circumstances and economic conditions.
BBB--Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate
protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances
are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay
principal for debt in this category than in higher rated categories.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): To provide more detailed indications of credit quality,
the ratings from "AA" to "BBB" may be modified by the addition
of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating
categories.
Provisional Ratings: A provisional rating ("p" ) assumes the successful
completion of the project being financed by the issuance of the bonds being
rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements is largely or
entirely dependent upon the successful and timely completion of the project.
This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to
completion, makes no comment on the likelihood of, or the risk of default upon
failure of, such completion. Accordingly, the investor should exercise his own
judgment with respect to such likelihood and risk.
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. A brief description of the applicable Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's" ) rating symbols and their meanings
follows:
Aaa--Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be the best quality. They carry
the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as "
gilt edge" . Interest payments are protected by a large, or by an
exceptionally stable, margin and principal is secure. While the various
protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized
are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues.
With the occasional exception of oversupply in a few specific instances, the
safety of obligations of this class is so absolute that their market value is
affected solely by money market fluctuations.
Aa--Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all
standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known
as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins
of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuations of
protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements
present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa
securities. These Aa bonds are high grade, their market value virtually immune
to all but money market influences, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
A--Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and
are to be considered as higher medium grade obligations. Factors giving
security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may
be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the
future. The market value of A-rated bonds may be influenced to some degree by
credit circumstances during a sustained period of depressed business
conditions. During periods of normalcy, bonds of this quality frequently move
in parallel with Aaa and Aa obligations, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
Baa--Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade obligations;
i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments
and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective
elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great
length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in
fact have speculative characteristics as well.
Moody's bond rating symbols may contain numerical modifiers of a generic
rating classification. The modifier 1 indicates that the bond ranks at the
high end of its category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and
the modifier 3 indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic
rating category.
Con--Bonds for which the security depends upon the completion of some act or
the fulfillment of some condition are rated conditionally. These are bonds
secured by (a) earnings of projects under construction, (b) earnings of
projects unseasoned in operating experience, (c) rentals which begin when
facilities are completed, or (d) payments to which some other limiting
condition attaches. Parenthetical rating denotes probable credit stature upon
completion of construction or elimination of basis of condition.
As published by the rating companies.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc.
and the Unitholders of Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 269 (IM-IT, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT,
Michigan IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and
Virginia Quality Trusts):
We have audited the accompanying statements of condition and the related
portfolios of Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 269 (IM-IT, California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT,
Michigan IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and
Virginia Quality Trusts) as of March 29, 1996. The statements of condition and
portfolios are the responsibility of the Sponsor. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on such financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our
procedures included confirmation of irrevocable letters of credit deposited to
purchase tax-exempt securities by correspondence with the Trustee. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by the Sponsor, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Insured Municipals Income
Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 269 (IM-IT,
California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Michigan IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New Jersey
IM-IT, Pennsylvania IM-IT and Virginia Quality Trusts) as of March 29, 1996,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
GRANT THORNTON LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 1996
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST and INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST
MULTI-SERIES 269
Statements of Condition
As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES California Florida Michigan
IM-IT IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Contracts to purchase tax-exempt securities <F1><F2><F4>... $ 8,604,681 $ 2,858,722 $ 2,901,514 $ 2,944,310
Accrued interest to the First Settlement Date <F1><F4>..... 110,855 18,545 47,065 53,837
Total...................................................... $ 8,715,536 $ 2,877,267 $ 2,948,579 $ 2,998,147
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability-- ...............................................
Accrued interest payable to Sponsor <F1><F4>............... $ 110,855 $ 18,545 $ 47,065 $ 53,837
Interest of Unitholders-- .................................
Cost to investors <F3>..................................... 9,048,000 3,006,000 3,051,000 3,096,000
Less: Gross underwriting commission <F3>................... 443,319 147,278 149,486 151,690
Net interest to Unitholders <F1><F3><F4>................... 8,604,681 2,858,722 2,901,514 2,944,310
Total...................................................... $ 8,715,536 $ 2,877,267 $ 2,948,579 $ 2,998,147
<FN>
<F1>The aggregate value of the Securities listed under "Portfolio" for
each Trust herein, and their cost to such Trust are the same. The value of the
Securities is determined by Interactive Data Corporation on the bases set
forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price"
. The contracts to purchase tax-exempt Securities are collateralized by
irrevocable letters of credit which have been deposited with the Trustee in
and for the following amounts:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Principal Offering Accrued
Amount of Amount of Price of Interest to
Letter of Bonds Under Bonds Under Expected
Credit Contracts Contracts Delivery Dates
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IM-IT.................... $8,713,596 $9,060,000 $8,604,681 $108,915
California IM-IT Trust... $2,877,647 $2,945,000 $2,858,722 $18,925
Florida IM-IT Trust...... $2,948,555 $3,030,000 $2,901,514 $47,041
Michigan IM-IT Trust..... $2,996,293 $3,100,000 $2,944,310 $51,983
<F2>Insurance coverage providing for timely payment, when due, of all principal
and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been obtained either by
such Trusts, by a prior owner of the Bonds, by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds or by the issuers of the Bonds involved. Such insurance
does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the Units.
The insurance obtained by the Insured Trusts is effective only while Bonds
thus insured are held in such Trusts. Neither the bid nor offering prices of
the underlying Bonds or of the Units, absent situations in which bonds are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default, include value, if any, attributable to the insurance obtained by such
Trusts.
<F3>The aggregate public offering price (exclusive of interest) and the aggregate
sales charge are computed on the bases set forth under "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" and "Trust
Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Profits" and assume all
single transactions involve less than 100 Units. For single transactions
involving 100 or more Units, the sales charge is reduced (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" ) resulting in an equal reduction
in both the Cost to investors and the Gross underwriting commission while the
Net interest to Unitholders remains unchanged.
<F4>The Trustee will advance to the Trust the amount of net interest accrued to
April 3, 1996, the First Settlement Date, for distribution to the Sponsor as
the Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST and INVESTORS' QUALITY TAX-EXEMPT TRUST
MULTI-SERIES 269
Statements of Condition (Continued)
As of March 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Virginia
INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES Minnesota New Jersey Pennsylvania Quality
IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Contracts to purchase tax-exempt securities <F1><F2><F4>... $ 2,877,741 $ 2,921,483 $ 2,911,976 $ 2,929,095
Accrued interest to the First Settlement Date <F1><F4>..... 29,728 56,761 25,559 37,440
Total...................................................... $ 2,907,469 $ 2,978,244 $ 2,937,535 $ 2,966,535
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability-- ...............................................
Accrued interest payable to Sponsor <F1><F4>............... $ 29,728 $ 56,761 $ 25,559 $ 37,440
Interest of Unitholders-- .................................
Cost to investors <F3>..................................... 3,026,000 3,072,000 3,062,000 3,080,000
Less: Gross underwriting commission <F3>................... 148,259 150,517 150,024 150,905
Net interest to Unitholders <F1><F3><F4>................... 2,877,741 2,921,483 2,911,976 2,929,095
Total...................................................... $ 2,907,469 $ 2,978,244 $ 2,937,535 $ 2,966,535
<FN>
<F1>The aggregate value of the Securities listed under "Portfolio" for
each Trust herein, and their cost to such Trust are the same. The value of the
Securities is determined by Interactive Data Corporation on the bases set
forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price"
. The contracts to purchase tax-exempt Securities are collateralized by
irrevocable letters of credit which have been deposited with the Trustee in
and for the following amounts:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Principal Offering Accrued
Amount of Amount of Price of Interest to
Letter of Bonds Under Bonds Under Expected
Credit Contracts Contracts Delivery Dates
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Minnesota IM-IT Trust...... $ 2,905,754 $ 3,040,000 $ 2,877,741 $ 28,013
New Jersey IM-IT Trust..... $ 2,976,684 $ 3,020,000 $ 2,921,483 $ 55,201
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust... $ 2,936,192 $ 3,025,000 $ 2,911,976 $ 24,216
Virginia Quality Trust..... $ 2,966,368 $ 3,020,000 $ 2,929,095 $ 37,273
</TABLE>
<F2>Insurance coverage providing for timely payment, when due, of all principal
and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been obtained either by
such Trusts, by a prior owner of the Bonds, by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds or by the issuers of the Bonds involved. Such insurance
does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the Units.
The insurance obtained by the Insured Trusts is effective only while Bonds
thus insured are held in such Trusts. Neither the bid nor offering prices of
the underlying Bonds or of the Units, absent situations in which bonds are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default, include value, if any, attributable to the insurance obtained by such
Trusts.
<F3>The aggregate public offering price (exclusive of interest) and the
aggregate sales charge are computed on the bases set forth under
"Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price" and "Trust
Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Profits" and assume all
single transactions involve less than 100 Units. For single transactions
involving 100 or more Units, the sales charge is reduced (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General" ) resulting in an equal reduction
in both the Cost to investors and the Gross underwriting commission while
the Net interest to Unitholders remains unchanged.
<F4>The Trustee will advance to the Trust the amount of net interest accrued to
April 3, 1996, the First Settlement Date, for distribution to the Sponsor as
the Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date.
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLES
As of the date of this prospectus, the following tables show the approximate
taxable estimated current returns for individuals that are equivalent to
tax-exempt estimated current returns under combined Federal and State taxes
(where applicable) using the published Federal and State tax rates (where
applicable) scheduled to be in effect in 1996. They incorporate increased tax
rates for higher income taxpayers that were included in the Revenue
Reconciliation Act of 1993. These tables illustrate approximately what you
would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt estimated
current return in your income tax bracket. The table assumes that Federal
taxable income is equal to State income subject to tax, and for cases in which
more than one State rate falls within a Federal bracket, the State rate
corresponding to the highest income within that Federal bracket is used. The
combined State and Federal tax rates shown reflect the fact that State tax
payments are currently deductible for Federal tax purposes. The table does not
reflect any local taxes or any taxes other than personal income taxes. The
tables do not show the approximate taxable estimated current returns for
individuals that are subject to the alternative minimum tax. The taxable
equivalent estimated current returns may be somewhat higher than the
equivalent returns indicated in the following tables for those individuals who
have adjusted gross incomes in excess of $117,950. The tables do not reflect
the effect of Federal or State limitations (if any) on the amount of allowable
itemized deductions and the deduction for personal or dependent exemptions or
any other credits. These limitations were designed to phase out certain
benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers. These limitations,
in effect, raise the marginal maximum Federal tax rate to approximately 44
percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to four personal
exemptions and to approximately 41 percent for taxpayers filing a single
return entitled to only one personal exemption. These limitations are subject
to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed and the
total amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the
limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to lose more than
80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions. See "
Other Matters--Federal Tax Status" for a more detailed discussion of
recent Federal tax legislation, including a discussion of provisions affecting
corporations.
IM-IT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 15% 5.88% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24% 8.82% 9.41%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 28 6.94 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72 10.42 11.11
58.15 - 121.30 96.90 - 147.70 31 7.25 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14 10.87 11.59
121.30 - 263.75 147.70 - 263.75 36 7.81 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94 11.72 12.50
Over 263.75 Over 263.75 39.6 8.28 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59 12.42 13.25
</TABLE>
CALIFORNIA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 20.1% 6.26% 6.88% 7.51% 8.14% 8.76% 9.39% 10.01%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 34.7 7.66 8.42 9.19 9.95 10.72 11.49 12.25
96.90 - 147.70 37.4 7.99 8.79 9.58 10.38 11.18 11.98 12.78
58.15 - 121.30 37.4 7.99 8.79 9.58 10.38 11.18 11.98 12.78
121.30 - 219.87 147.70 - 263.75 42 8.62 9.48 10.34 11.21 12.07 12.93 13.79
219.87 - 263.75 42 8.62 9.48 10.34 11.21 12.07 12.93 13.79
263.75 - 439.74 45.2 9.12 10.04 10.95 11.86 12.77 13.69 14.60
Over 263.75 Over 439.74 45.2 9.12 10.04 10.95 11.86 12.77 13.69 14.60
</TABLE>
* The State tax brackets are those for 1995. The 1996 brackets will be
adjusted to take into account changes in the California Consumer Price Index.
These adjustments have not yet been released. The table reflects a decrease in
State income tax rates for high income taxpayers which is, under current law,
scheduled to take place beginning in 1996.
FLORIDA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 15% 5.88% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24% 8.82% 9.41%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 28 6.94 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72 10.42 11.11
58.15 - 121.30 96.90 - 147.70 31 7.25 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14 10.87 11.59
121.30 - 263.75 147.70 - 263.75 36 7.81 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94 11.72 12.50
Over 263.75 Over 263.75 39.6 8.28 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59 12.42 13.25
</TABLE>
* The State of Florida does not impose an income tax on individuals. However,
Florida does impose an intangible personal property tax, which is not included
in the table because it is generally based on property value rather than
income.
MICHIGAN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 20.2% 6.27% 6.89% 7.52% 8.15% 8.77% 9.40% 10.03%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 32.4 7.40 8.14 8.88 9.62 10.36 11.09 11.83
58.15 - 121.30 96.90 - 147.70 35.2 7.72 8.49 9.26 10.03 10.80 11.57 12.35
121.30 - 263.75 147.70 - 263.75 39.9 8.32 9.15 9.98 10.82 11.65 12.48 13.31
Over 263.75 Over 263.75 43.3 8.82 9.70 10.58 11.46 12.35 13.23 14.11
</TABLE>
*The combined State and Federal tax brackets reflect Federal and State income
and the State intangibles tax rate, because the intangibles tax is generally
based on income received from intangibles.
MINNESOTA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 21.8% 6.39% 7.03% 7.67% 8.31% 8.95% 9.59% 10.23%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 34.1 7.59 8.35 9.10 9.86 10.62 11.38 12.14
58.15 - 121.30 96.90 - 147.70 36.9 7.92 8.72 9.51 10.30 11.09 11.89 12.68
121.30 - 263.75 147.70 - 263.75 41.4 8.53 9.39 10.24 11.09 11.95 12.80 13.65
Over 263.75 Over 263.75 44.7 9.04 9.95 10.85 11.75 12.66 13.56 14.47
</TABLE>
NEW JERSEY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 16.5% 5.99% 6.59% 7.19% 7.78% 8.38% 8.98% 9.58%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 32 7.35 8.09 8.82 9.56 10.29 11.03 11.76
96.90 - 147.70 34.8 7.67 8.44 9.20 9.97 10.74 11.50 12.27
58.15 - 121.30 35.4 7.74 8.51 9.29 10.06 10.84 11.61 12.38
121.30 - 263.75 147.70 - 263.75 40.1 8.35 9.18 10.02 10.85 11.69 12.52 13.36
Over 263.75 Over 263.75 43.4 8.83 9.72 10.60 11.48 12.37 13.25 14.13
</TABLE>
PENNSYLVANIA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 17.4% 6.05% 6.66% 7.26% 7.87% 8.47% 9.08% 9.69%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 30 7.14 7.86 8.57 9.29 10.00 10.71 11.43
58.15 - 121.30 96.90 - 147.70 32.9 7.45 8.20 8.94 9.69 10.43 11.18 11.92
121.30 - 263.75 147.70 - 263.75 37.8 8.04 8.84 9.65 10.45 11.25 12.06 12.86
Over 263.75 Over 263.75 41.3 8.52 9.37 10.22 11.07 11.93 12.78 13.63
</TABLE>
VIRGINIA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 24.00 $ 0 - 40.10 19.9% 6.24% 6.87% 7.49% 8.11% 8.74% 9.36% 9.99%
24.00 - 58.15 40.10 - 96.90 32.1 7.36 8.10 8.84 9.57 10.31 11.05 11.78
58.15 - 121.30 96.90 - 147.70 35 7.69 8.46 9.23 10.00 10.77 11.54 12.31
121.30 - 263.75 147.70 - 263.75 39.7 8.29 9.12 9.95 10.78 11.61 12.44 13.27
Over 263.75 Over 263.75 43.1 8.79 9.67 10.54 11.42 12.30 13.18 14.06
</TABLE>
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns with
the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trusts and returns over specified periods on other similar Van Kampen
American Capital sponsored unit investment trusts with returns on taxable
investments such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank CDs and money
market accounts or money market funds, each of which has investment
characteristics that may differ from those of the Trusts. U.S. Government
bonds, for example, are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
Government and bank CDs and money market accounts are insured by an agency of
the federal government. Money market accounts and money market funds provide
stability of principal, but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition
of the short-term debt market. The investment characteristics of the Trusts
are described more fully elsewhere in this Prospectus.
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS
The tables below set forth the per Unit estimated monthly and semi-annual
distributions of interest and principal to Unitholders. The tables assume no
changes in expenses, no changes in the current interest rates, no exchanges,
redemptions, sales or prepayments of the underlying Securities prior to
maturity or expected retirement date and the receipt of principal upon
maturity or expected retirement date. To the extent the foregoing assumptions
change actual distributions will vary.
IM-IT
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.45 $5.45
June 1996 - June 2006 4.42 4.42
July 2006 4.22 $132.62 136.84
August 2006 3.69 55.26 58.95
September 2006 - August 2007 3.51 3.51
September 2007 3.47 27.63 31.10
October 2007 - April 2020 3.37 3.37
May 2020 3.37 18.79 22.16
June 2020 - July 2020 3.37 3.37
August 2020 3.27 79.58 82.85
September 2020 2.96 43.10 46.06
October 2020 - June 2023 2.82 2.82
July 2023 2.67 110.52 113.19
August 2023 - September 2023 2.32 2.32
October 2023 1.93 110.52 112.45
November 2023 1.85 1.85
December 2023 1.80 39.24 41.04
January 2024 - June 2024 1.67 1.67
July 2024 1.65 19.34 20.99
August 2024 - December 2024 1.59 1.59
January 2025 1.55 33.16 34.71
February 2025 - April 2025 1.45 1.45
May 2025 1.38 55.26 56.64
June 2025 1.05 110.52 111.57
July 2025 .70 .70
August 2025 .28 110.52 110.80
September 2025 .13 55.26 55.39
</TABLE>
IM-IT (Continued)
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each June and December Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
June 1996 $9.96 $9.96
December 1996 - June 2006 26.75 26.75
July 2006 $132.62 132.62
August 2006 55.26 55.26
December 2006 22.16 22.16
June 2007 21.25 21.25
September 2007 27.63 27.63
December 2007 20.80 20.80
June 2008 - December 2019 20.44 20.44
May 2020 18.79 18.79
June 2020 20.44 20.44
August 2020 79.58 79.58
September 2020 43.10 43.10
December 2020 18.24 18.24
June 2021 - June 2023 17.09 17.09
July 2023 110.52 110.52
October 2023 110.52 110.52
December 2023 13.02 39.24 52.26
June 2024 10.15 10.15
July 2024 19.34 19.34
December 2024 9.70 9.70
January 2025 33.16 33.16
May 2025 55.26 55.26
June 2025 8.43 110.52 118.95
August 2025 110.52 110.52
September 2025 1.14 55.26 56.40
</TABLE>
California IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.46 $5.46
June 1996 - July 2006 4.43 4.43
August 2006 4.18 $166.33 170.51
September 2006 - November 2019 3.62 3.62
December 2019 3.53 76.51 80.04
January 2020 - July 2020 3.29 3.29
August 2020 2.97 239.52 242.49
September 2020 - November 2023 2.22 2.22
December 2023 1.99 166.34 168.33
January 2024 - September 2025 1.46 1.46
October 2025 1.42 33.26 34.68
November 2025 - July 2026 1.32 1.32
August 2026 1.14 131.41 132.55
September 2026 - March 2028 .71 .71
April 2028 .06 166.33 166.39
</TABLE>
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each January and July Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
July 1996 $14.42 $14.42
January 1997 - July 2006 26.77 26.77
August 2006 $166.33 166.33
January 2007 22.49 22.49
July 2007 - July 2019 21.93 21.93
December 2019 76.51 76.51
January 2020 21.50 21.50
July 2020 19.92 19.92
August 2020 239.52 239.52
January 2021 14.19 14.19
July 2021 - July 2023 13.43 13.43
December 2023 166.34 166.34
January 2024 12.44 12.44
July 2024 - July 2025 8.87 8.87
October 2025 33.26 33.26
January 2026 8.39 8.39
July 2026 7.99 7.99
August 2026 131.41 131.41
January 2027 4.73 4.73
July 2027 - January 2028 4.30 4.30
April 2028 1.50 166.33 167.83
</TABLE>
Florida IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.36 $5.36
June 1996 - September 2019 4.35 4.35
October 2019 4.12 $163.88 168.00
November 2019 - September 2020 3.58 3.58
October 2020 3.38 147.49 150.87
November 2020 - April 2021 2.89 2.89
May 2021 2.79 81.94 84.73
June 2021 2.55 2.55
July 2021 2.32 167.16 169.48
August 2021 - September 2021 1.80 1.80
October 2021 1.69 81.94 83.63
November 2021 - September 2023 1.44 1.44
October 2023 1.44 16.39 17.83
November 2023 - May 2025 1.44 1.44
June 2025 1.22 163.88 165.10
July 2025 - September 2025 .70 .70
October 2025 .59 81.94 82.53
November 2025 - May 2026 .33 .33
June 2026 .21 88.49 88.70
</TABLE>
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each January and July Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
July 1996 $14.17 $14.17
January 1997 - July 2019 26.30 26.30
October 2019 $163.88 163.88
January 2020 23.76 23.76
July 2020 21.68 21.68
October 2020 147.49 147.49
January 2021 19.40 19.40
May 2021 81.94 81.94
July 2021 16.50 167.16 183.66
October 2021 81.94 81.94
January 2022 9.72 9.72
July 2022 - July 2023 8.72 8.72
October 2023 16.39 16.39
January 2024 - January 2025 8.72 8.72
June 2025 163.88 163.88
July 2025 7.76 7.76
October 2025 81.94 81.94
January 2026 3.03 3.03
June 2026 1.58 88.49 90.07
</TABLE>
Michigan IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.43 $5.43
June 1996 - April 2021 4.40 4.40
May 2021 4.18 $161.49 165.67
June 2021 - November 2021 3.67 3.67
December 2021 3.46 161.50 164.96
January 2022 - May 2023 2.98 2.98
June 2023 2.78 161.50 164.28
July 2023 - April 2024 2.30 2.30
May 2024 2.23 46.84 49.07
June 2024 - February 2025 2.08 2.08
March 2025 1.45 161.49 162.94
April 2025 1.32 1.32
May 2025 1.05 209.95 211.00
June 2025 - May 2026 .39 .39
June 2026 .01 98.52 98.53
</TABLE>
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each January and July Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
July 1996 $14.36 $14.36
January 1997 - January 2021 26.65 26.65
May 2021 $161.49 161.49
July 2021 24.95 24.95
December 2021 161.50 161.50
January 2022 21.31 21.31
July 2022 - January 2023 18.07 18.07
June 2023 161.50 161.50
July 2023 17.17 17.17
January 2024 13.93 13.93
May 2024 46.84 46.84
July 2024 13.41 13.41
January 2025 12.58 12.58
March 2025 161.49 161.49
May 2025 209.95 209.95
July 2025 6.76 6.76
January 2026 2.41 2.41
June 2026 1.62 98.52 100.14
</TABLE>
Minnesota IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.26 $5.26
June 1996 - January 2004 4.27 4.27
February 2004 4.15 $82.61 86.76
March 2004 - January 2007 3.88 3.88
February 2007 3.64 165.24 168.88
March 2007 - January 2012 3.08 3.08
February 2012 2.99 69.40 72.39
March 2012 - January 2015 2.79 2.79
February 2015 2.67 95.83 98.50
March 2015 2.40 2.40
April 2015 2.29 82.62 84.91
May 2015 - June 2015 2.05 2.05
July 2015 1.85 165.23 167.08
August 2015 - June 2020 1.39 1.39
July 2020 1.37 16.53 17.90
August 2020 - June 2023 1.32 1.32
July 2023 1.21 82.61 83.82
August 2023 - February 2024 .97 .97
March 2024 .77 165.24 166.01
April 2024 - August 2025 .29 .29
September 2025 -- 79.31 79.31
</TABLE>
Minnesota IM-IT Trust (Continued)
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each January and July Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
July 1996 $13.93 $13.93
January 1997 - January 2004 25.85 25.85
February 2004 $82.61 82.61
July 2004 23.79 23.79
January 2005 - January 2007 23.52 23.52
February 2007 165.24 165.24
July 2007 19.23 19.23
January 2008 - January 2012 18.66 18.66
February 2012 69.40 69.40
July 2012 17.14 17.14
January 2013 - January 2015 16.93 16.93
February 2015 95.83 95.83
April 2015 82.62 82.62
July 2015 13.47 165.23 178.70
January 2016 - January 2020 8.43 8.43
July 2020 8.41 16.53 24.94
January 2021 - January 2023 8.02 8.02
July 2023 7.92 82.61 90.53
January 2024 5.92 5.92
March 2024 165.24 165.24
July 2024 2.96 2.96
January 2025 - July 2025 1.79 1.79
September 2025 .30 79.31 79.61
</TABLE>
New Jersey IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.41 $5.41
June 1996 - February 2006 4.39 4.39
March 2006 4.34 $32.55 36.89
April 2006 - June 2006 4.23 4.23
July 2006 4.09 97.65 101.74
August 2006 - November 2007 3.76 3.76
December 2007 3.52 162.76 166.28
January 2008 - November 2020 2.97 2.97
December 2020 2.40 162.76 165.16
January 2021 - September 2022 2.29 2.29
October 2022 2.21 61.85 64.06
November 2022 - June 2025 2.03 2.03
July 2025 1.97 48.83 50.80
August 2025 - December 2025 1.83 1.83
January 2026 1.66 130.21 131.87
February 2026 - June 2026 1.25 1.25
July 2026 1.02 162.76 163.78
August 2026 - October 2033 .49 .49
November 2033 .33 123.70 124.03
</TABLE>
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each January and July Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
July 1996 $14.29 $14.29
January 1997 - January 2006 26.51 26.51
March 2006 $32.55 32.55
July 2006 25.70 97.65 123.35
January 2007 - July 2007 22.72 22.72
December 2007 162.76 162.76
January 2008 21.69 21.69
July 2008 - July 2020 17.98 17.98
December 2020 162.76 162.76
January 2021 16.71 16.71
July 2021 - July 2022 13.84 13.84
October 2022 61.85 61.85
January 2023 12.98 12.98
July 2023 - January 2025 12.27 12.27
July 2025 12.21 48.83 61.04
January 2026 10.90 130.21 141.11
July 2026 7.35 162.76 170.11
January 2027 - July 2033 3.00 3.00
November 2033 1.83 123.70 125.53
</TABLE>
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.41 $5.41
June 1996 - August 2005 4.39 4.39
September 2005 4.02 $91.44 95.46
October 2005 - June 2006 3.95 3.95
July 2006 3.43 130.63 134.06
August 2006 - August 2007 3.33 3.33
September 2007 3.21 81.65 84.86
October 2007 - February 2021 2.93 2.93
March 2021 2.87 52.25 55.12
April 2021 - August 2022 2.72 2.72
September 2022 2.53 142.07 144.60
October 2022 - July 2024 2.08 2.08
August 2024 1.98 81.64 83.62
September 2024 - August 2025 1.73 1.73
September 2025 1.65 65.32 66.97
October 2025 - December 2025 1.44 1.44
January 2026 1.29 114.30 115.59
February 2026 .94 .94
March 2026 .70 65.32 66.02
April 2026 - September 2033 .65 .65
October 2033 .06 163.29 163.35
</TABLE>
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust (Continued)
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each January and July Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
July 1996 $14.30 $14.30
January 1997 - July 2005 26.55 26.55
September 2005 $91.44 91.44
January 2006 24.44 24.44
July 2006 23.41 130.63 154.04
January 2007 - July 2007 20.18 20.18
September 2007 81.65 81.65
January 2008 18.46 18.46
July 2008 - January 2021 17.78 17.78
March 2021 52.25 52.25
July 2021 16.87 16.87
January 2022 - July 2022 16.51 16.51
September 2022 142.07 142.07
January 2023 13.72 13.72
July 2023 - July 2024 12.62 12.62
August 2024 81.64 81.64
January 2025 10.77 10.77
July 2025 10.53 10.53
September 2025 65.32 65.32
January 2026 9.11 114.30 123.41
March 2026 65.32 65.32
July 2026 4.33 4.33
January 2027 - July 2033 3.99 3.99
October 2033 1.39 163.29 164.68
</TABLE>
Virginia Quality Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.47 $5.47
June 1996 - December 2007 4.44 4.44
January 2008 4.20 $162.33 166.53
February 2008 - October 2008 3.65 3.65
November 2008 3.11 162.34 165.45
December 2008 - September 2015 2.84 2.84
October 2015 2.74 73.05 75.79
November 2015 - January 2021 2.50 2.50
February 2021 2.36 40.59 42.95
March 2021 - December 2023 2.34 2.34
January 2024 2.12 152.59 154.71
February 2024 1.62 1.62
March 2024 1.33 81.17 82.50
April 2024 - August 2026 1.27 1.27
September 2026 .67 146.11 146.78
October 2026 - June 2029 .56 .56
July 2029 .37 162.33 162.70
</TABLE>
Semi-annual
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Distribution Dates Estimated Estimated Estimated
(Each May and November Interest Principal Total
Unless Otherwise Indicated) Distribution Distribution Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1996 $5.52 $5.52
November 1996 - November 2007 26.85 26.85
January 2008 $162.33 162.33
May 2008 23.46 23.46
November 2008 21.57 162.34 183.91
May 2009 - May 2015 17.19 17.19
October 2015 73.05 73.05
November 2015 16.75 16.75
May 2016 - November 2020 15.16 15.16
February 2021 40.59 40.59
May 2021 14.52 14.52
November 2021 - November 2023 14.16 14.16
January 2024 152.59 152.59
March 2024 81.17 81.17
May 2024 10.05 10.05
November 2024 - May 2026 7.70 7.70
September 2026 146.11 146.11
November 2026 5.67 5.67
May 2027 - May 2029 3.41 3.41
July 2029 .95 162.33 163.28
</TABLE>
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representations
not contained in this Prospectus; and any information or representation not
contained herein must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the
Fund, the Sponsor or the Underwriters. This Prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in any state
to any person to whom it is notlawful to make such offer in such state.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Title
Page
<S> <C>
INTRODUCTION 2
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION 3
UNITHOLDER EXPLANATIONS 7
Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts 7
The Fund 7
Objectives and Securities Selection 8
Risk Factors 10
Replacement Bonds 12
Bond Redemptions 13
Distributions 14
Change of Distribution Option 14
Certificates 14
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns 15
Interest Earning Schedule 15
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Interest Income 15
Accrued Interest 16
Accrued Interest 16
Public Offering 16
General 16
Offering Price 18
Market for Units 19
Distributions of Interest and Principal 20
Reinvestment Option 21
Redemption of Units 21
Reports Provided 22
Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts 23
IM-IT 30
CALIFORNIA IM-IT TRUST 34
FLORIDA IM-IT TRUST 45
MICHIGAN IM-IT TRUST 50
MINNESOTA IM-IT TRUST 58
NEW JERSEY IM-IT TRUST 60
PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST 66
VIRGINIA QUALITY IM-IT TRUST 74
NOTES TO PORTFOLIOS 79
UNDERWRITING 81
TRUST ADMINISTRATION 85
Fund Administration and Expenses 85
Sponsor 85
Compensation of Sponsor and Evaluator 85
Trustee 86
Trustee's Fee 86
Portfolio Administration 87
Sponsor Purchases of Units 88
Insurance Premiums 88
Miscellaneous Expenses 88
General 88
Amendment or Termination 88
Limitation on Liabilities 89
Unit Distribution 90
Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation 90
OTHER MATTERS 91
Legal Opinions 91
Independent Certified Public Accountants 92
FEDERAL TAX STATUS 92
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS 96
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS 98
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION 99
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
TABLES 101
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS 105
</TABLE>
This Prospectus contains information concerning the Fund and the Sponsor, but
does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statements and exhibits relating thereto, which the Fund has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act
of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and to which reference is
hereby made.
PROSPECTUS
March 29, 1996
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust,
Multi-Series 269
IM-IT 369
California IM-IT 151
Florida IM-IT 102
Michigan IM-IT 136
Minnesota IM-IT 58
New Jersey IM-IT 110
Pennsylvania IM-IT 216
Virginia Quality 70
A Wealth of Knowledge A Knowledge of Wealth (sm)
VAN KAMPEN AMERICAN CAPITAL
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
2800 Post Oak Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77056
Please retain this Prospectus for future reference.
Contents of Post-Effective Amendment
to Registration Statement
This Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement
comprises the following papers and documents:
The facing sheet
The prospectus
The signatures
Financial Data Schedule
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant, Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors Quality Tax-
Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 269, certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to
Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this
Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, and its seal to
be hereunto affixed and attested, all in the City of Chicago and State of
Illinois on the 1st day of April, 1996.
Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors
Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 269
(Registrant)
By Van Kampen American Capital Distributors, Inc.
(Depositor)
By Sandra A. Waterworth
Vice President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Post Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed
below by the following persons in the capacities on April 1, 1996:
Signature Title
Don G. Powell Chairman and Chief )
Executive Officer )
)
William R. Molinari President and Chief )
Operating Officer )
)
Ronald A. Nyberg Executive Vice President )
and General Counsel )
)
William R. Rybak Executive Vice President and )
Chief Financial Officer )
Sandra A. Waterworth ) (Attorney in Fact)*
____________________
* An executed copy of each of the related powers of attorney was filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 of Insured Municipals Income
Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 203
(File No. 33-65744) and with the Registration Statement on Form S-6
of Insured Municipals Income Trust, 170th Insured Multi-Series (File
No. 33-55891) and the same are hereby incorporated herein by this
reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
This report reflects the current period taken from 487 on March 29, 1996 it is
unaudited
</LEGEND>
<SERIES>
<NUMBER> 110
<NAME> I-NJ
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> MAR-29-1996
<PERIOD-END> MAR-29-1996
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 2921483
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 2921483
<RECEIVABLES> 56761
<ASSETS-OTHER> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2978244
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 56761
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES> 56761
<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 2921483
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 3072
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 0
<NET-ASSETS> 2921483
<DIVIDEND-INCOME> 0
<INTEREST-INCOME> 0
<OTHER-INCOME> 0
<EXPENSES-NET> 0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME> 0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT> 0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS> 0
<EQUALIZATION> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED> 0
<SHARES-REINVESTED> 0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<GROSS-EXPENSE> 0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN> 0
<PER-SHARE-NII> 0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC> 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND> 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS> 0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END> 0
<EXPENSE-RATIO> 0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING> 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE> 0
</TABLE>
