File No. 33-55885
CIK #897395
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004
Amendment No. 1
To
Form S-6
For Registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of Securities of Unit
Investment Trusts Registered on Form N-8B-2.
A. Exact Name of Trust: Insured Municipals Income Trust
168th Insured Multi-Series
B. Name of Depositor: Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
C. Complete address of Depositor's principal executive offices:
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
D. Name and complete address of agents for service:
Chapman and Cutler Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
Attention: Mark J. Kneedy Attention: John C. Merritt,
111 W. Monroe Street Chairman
Chicago, Illinois 60603 One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
E. Title and amount of securities being registered: 27,654* Units
F. Proposed maximum offering price to the public of the securities being
registered: ($1020 per Unit**): $28,207,080
G. Amount of filing fee, computed at one fiftieth of 1 percent of
proposed maximum aggregate offering price to the public: $9,726.56
($351.72 previously paid)
H. Approximate date of proposed sale to the public:
As Soon As Practicable After The Effective Date Of The
Registration Statement
____
/ X :/Check box if it is proposed that this filing will become effective
on October 27, 1994 at 2:00 P.M. pursuant to Rule 487.
* 18,436 Units registered for primary distribution.
9,218 Units registered for resale by Depositor of Units.
previously sold in primary distribution.
** Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the
registration fee.
Form N-8B-2 Form S-6
Item Number Heading in Prospectus
--
Insured Municipals Income Trust,
168th Insured Multi-Series
Cross Reference Sheet
Pursuant to Rule 404(c) of Regulation C
under the Securities Act of 1933
(Form N-8B-2 Items Required by Instruction
1 as to Prospectus on Form S-6)
Form N-8B-2 Form S-6
Item Number Heading in Prospectus
I. Organization and General Information
1. (a) Name of trust) )
(b) Title of securities issued ) Prospectus Front Cover Page
2. Name and address of Depositor ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Trust Administration
3. Name and address of Trustee ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Trust Administration
4. Name and address of principal ) Underwriting
underwriter )
5. Organization of trust ) Introduction
6. Execution and termination of ) Introduction
Trust Indenture and Agreement ) Trust Administration
7. Changes of Name ) *
8. Fiscal year ) *
9. Material Litigation ) *
II. General Description of the Trust and Securities of the Trust
10. General information regarding ) Introduction
trust's securities and rights ) Unitholder Explanations
of security holders ) Trust Information
) Trust Administration
11. Type of securities comprising ) Introduction
units ) Trust Information
) Trust Portfolios
12. Certain information regarding ) *
periodic payment certificates )
13. (a) Load, fees, charges and expenses) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Unitholder Explanations
Trust Information
Trust Administration
(b) Certain information regarding )
periodic payment plan ) *
certificates )
(c) Certain percentages ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Unitholder Explanations
(d) Certain other fees, expenses or) Unitholder Explanations
charges payable by holders ) Trust Administration
(e) Certain profits to be received) Unitholder Explanations
by depositor, principal ) Underwriting
underwriter, trustee or ) Notes to Portfolios
affiliated persons )
(f) Ratio of annual charges to income) *
)
14. Issuance of trust's securities ) Unitholder Explanations
15. Receipt and handling of payments ) *
from purchasers )
16. Acquisition and disposition of ) Introduction
underlying securities ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
17. Withdrawal or redemption ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
18. (a) Receipt and disposition ) Introduction
of income ) Unitholder Explanations
(b) Reinvestment of distributions ) *
(c) Reserves or special funds ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
(d) Schedule of distributions ) *
19. Records, accounts and reports ) Unitholder Explanations
Trust Administration )
20. Certain miscellaneous provisions ) Trust Administration
of Trust Agreement )
21. Loans to security holders ) *
22. Limitations on liability ) Trust Portfolios
) Trust Administration
23. Bonding arrangements ) *
24. Other material provisions of ) *
trust indenture or agreement )
III. Organization, Personnel and Affiliated Persons of Depositor
25. Organization of Depositor ) Trust Administration
26. Fees received by Depositor ) Trust Administration
27. Business of Depositor ) Trust Administration
28. Certain information as to )
officials and affiliated ) *
persons of Depositor )
29. Companies owning securities of ) *
Depositor )
30. Controlling persons of Depositor ) *
31. Compensation of Directors ) *
32. Compensation of Directors ) *
33. Compensation of Employees ) *
34. Compensation to other persons ) Unitholder Explanations
IV. Distribution and Redemption of Securities
35. Distribution of trust's securities Introduction
by states Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts
36. Suspension of sales of trust's ) *
securities )
37. Revocation of authority to distribute) *
38. (a) Method of distribution )
(b) Underwriting agreements ) Unitholder Explanations
(c) Selling agreements )
39. (a) Organization of principal )
underwriter )
) Trust Administration
(b) N.A.S.D. membership by )
principal underwriter )
40. Certain fees received by ) *
principal underwriter )
41. (a) Business of principal underwriter) Trust Administration
)
(b) Branch offices of principal ) *
underwriter )
(c) Salesmen of principal underwriter) *
)
42. Ownership of securities of the trust) *
)
43. Certain brokerage commissions ) *
received by principal underwriter)
44. (a) Method of valuation ) Introduction
) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
(b) Schedule as to offering price ) *
(c) Variation in offering price ) Unitholder Explanations
to certain persons )
45. Suspension of redemption rights ) *
46. (a) Redemption valuation ) Unitholder Explanations
) Trust Administration
(b) Schedule as to redemption price) *
)
47. Purchase and sale of interests ) Unitholder Explanations
in underlying securities ) Trust Administration
V. Information Concerning the Trustee or Custodian
48. Organization and regulation of trustee) Trust Administration
)
49. Fees and expenses of trustee ) Summary of Essential Financial
) Information
) Trust Administration
50. Trustee's lien ) Trust Administration
VI. Information Concerning Insurance of Holders of Securities
51. Insurance of holders of trust's )
securities ) *
VII. Policy of Registrant
52. (a) Provisions of trust agreement ) Trust Administration
with respect to replacement or)
elimination of portfolio securities)
(b) Transactions involving elimination)
of underlying securities ) *
(c) Policy regarding substitution or) Trust Administration
elimination of underlying securities)
(d) Fundamental policy not ) *
otherwise covered )
53. Tax Status of trust ) Trust Information
) Other Matters
VIII. Financial and Statistical Information
54. Trust's securities during last ten years) *
55. )
56. Certain information regarding ) *
57. periodic payment certificates )
58. )
59. Financial statements (Instructions ) Other Matters
1(c) to Form S-6) )
_________________________________
* Inapplicable, omitted, answer negative or not required
Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may
offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes
effective. This Prospectus shall not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these
securities in any State in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be
unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of
any State.
Preliminary Prospectus Dated October 27, 1994
Subject To Completion
October 27, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt
Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series
California IM-IT 133
Florida IM-IT 85
Minnesota IM-IT 54
New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Series 13
New York IM-IT 122
Pennsylvania IM-IT 194
In the opinion of counsel, interest to the Fund and to Unitholders, with
certain exceptions, is excludable under existing law from gross income for
Federal income taxes. In addition, the interest income of each State Trust is,
in the opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state and local
taxes, when held by residents of the state where the issuers of Bonds in such
Trust are located. Capital gains, if any, are subject to Federal tax.
The Fund. The objectives of the Fund are Federal and, in the case of a State
Trust, state tax-exempt income and conservation of capital through an
investment in a diversified portfolio of tax-exempt bonds. The Fund consists
of six underlying separate unit investment trusts designated as California
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 133 (the "California IM-IT
Trust"), Florida Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 85 (the "
Florida IM-IT Trust"), Minnesota Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series
54 (the "Minnesota IM-IT Trust"), New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered
Maturity Series 13 (the "New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity
Trust"), New York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 122 (the "
New York IM-IT Trust") and Pennsylvania Insured Municipals Income Trust,
Series 194 (the "Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust"). The various trusts are
collectively referred to herein as the "Trusts", the California IM-IT,
Florida IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
New York IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts are sometimes collectively
referred to herein as the "State Trusts", while the California IM-IT,
Florida IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
New York IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts are sometimes collectively
referred to herein as the "Insured Trusts", the New York IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity is sometimes referred to herein as the "
State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust". Each Trust initially consists
of delivery statements relating to contracts to purchase securities and,
thereafter, will consist of such securities as may continue to be held (the
"Bonds"or "Securities"). Such Securities are interest-bearing
obligations issued by or on behalf of municipalities and other governmental
authorities, the interest on which is, in the opinion of recognized bond
counsel to the issuing governmental authority, exempt from all Federal income
taxes under the existing law. In addition, the interest income of each State
Trust is, in the opinion of counsel, exempt to the extent indicated from state
and local taxes, when held by residents of the state where the issuers of
Bonds in such Trust are located.
"AAA"Rating for the Insured Trusts. Insurance guaranteeing the
payments of principal and interest, when due, on the Securities in the
portfolio of each Insured Trust has been obtained from a municipal bond
insurance company either by such Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds involved,
by a prior owner of the Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such
Bonds in an Insured Trust. See "Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the
Bonds in the Insured Trusts"on page 21. Insurance obtained by an Insured
Trust applies only while Bonds are retained in such Trust while insurance
obtained on Preinsured Bonds is effective so long as such Bonds are
outstanding. The Trustee, upon the sale of a Bond insured under an insurance
policy obtained by an Insured Trust, has a right to obtain from the insurer
involved permanent insurance for such Bond upon the payment of a single
predetermined insurance premium and any expenses related thereto from the
proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Insurance relates only to the Bonds in a
Trust and not to the Units offered hereby or to the market value thereof. As a
result of such insurance, the Units of each Insured Trust have received a
rating of "AAA"by Standard & Poor's Corporation. Standard & Poor's
Corporation has indicated that this rating is not a recommendation to buy,
hold or sell Units nor does it take into account the extent to which expenses
of each Insured Trust or sales by each Insured Trust of Bonds for less than
the purchase price paid by such Trust will reduce payments to Unitholders of
the interest and principal required to be paid on such Bonds. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts". No
representation is made as to any insurer's ability to meet its commitments.
Public Offering Price. The Public Offering Price of the Units of each Trust
during the initial offering period is equal to the aggregate offering price of
the Securities in such Trust's portfolio and cash, if any, in the Principal
Account held or owned by such Trust Fund plus the applicable sales charge plus
Purchased Interest and accrued interest, if any. After the initial public
offering period, the secondary market Public Offering Price of each Trust will
be equal to the aggregate bid price of the Securities in such Trust and cash,
if any, in the Principal Account held or owned by such Trust Fund plus the
applicable sales charge plus Purchased Interest and accrued interest, if any.
Sales charges for the Trusts in the initial market, expressed both as a
percentage of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest) and as
a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are set forth
in footnote (2) under "Summary of Essential Financial Information".
For sales charges in the secondary market, see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering". If the Securities in each Trust were
available for direct purchase by investors, the purchase price of the
Securities would not include the sales charge included in the Public Offering
Price of the Units. During the initial offering period, the sales charge is
reduced on a graduated scale for sales involving at least 100 Units. If Units
were available for purchase at the close of business on the day before the
Date of Deposit (except for the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M.
Central Time on the Date of Deposit), the Public Offering Price per Unit would
have been that amount set forth in the "Summary of Essential Financial
Information"for each Trust. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering".
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS
A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
As published by the rating companies.
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return. The annual Estimated
Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return to Unitholders as of the close
of business on the day before the Date of Deposit (except for the Pennsylvania
IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit) were as set
forth under "Per Unit Information"for each Trust. The methods of
calculating Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are set
forth in the footnotes to the "Per Unit Information"for each Trust.
Objectives of The Fund. The objectives of the Fund are income exempt from
Federal income tax and, in the case of a State Trust, Federal and state income
tax (if any) and conservation of capital through an investment in diversified
portfolios of Federal and state tax-exempt obligations. There is, of course,
no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its objectives. The Fund may be an
appropriate investment vehicle for investors who desire to participate in a
portfolio of tax-exempt fixed income securities with greater diversification
than they might be able to acquire individually. In addition, securities of
the type deposited in the Fund are often not available in small amounts. Units
of the Trust are not deposits or obligations of, or guaranteed or endorsed by,
any bank and are not federally insured or otherwise protected by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other agency
and involve investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.
Distributions. Purchasers of Units will receive distributions on a monthly
basis. See "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts"
. Record dates will be the first day of each month. Distributions will be made
on the fifteenth day of the month subsequent to the respective record dates.
Market for Units. Although not obligated to do so, the Sponsor, Van Kampen
Merritt Inc., intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may, maintain
a secondary market for the Units at prices based upon the aggregate bid prices
of the Securities in the respective Trusts plus Purchased Interest; however,
during the initial offering period such prices will be based upon the
aggregate offering prices of the Securities plus Purchased Interest. If such a
market is not maintained and no other over-the-counter market is available, a
Unitholder will be able to dispose of his Units only through redemption at
prices based upon the bid prices of the underlying Securities plus Purchased
Interest (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Redemption of
Units"and "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Market for
Units").
Reinvestment Option. Unitholders have the opportunity to have their
distributions reinvested into an open-end, management investment company as
described herein. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Reinvestment Option".
Risk Factors. An investment in the Trusts should be made with an understanding
of the risks associated therewith, including, among other factors, the
inability of the issuer or an insurer to pay the principal of or interest on a
bond when due, volatile interest rates, early call provisions, and changes to
the tax status of the Bonds. See "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of
Bonds in the Trusts--Risk Factors".
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
168th INSURED MULTI-SERIES
Summary of Essential Financial Information
At the Close of Business on the day before the Date
of Deposit: October 26, 1994
(except for the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time
on the Date of Deposit: October 27, 1994)
Sponsor: Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
Evaluator: American Portfolio Evaluation Services
(A division of a subsidiary of the Sponsor)
Trustee: The Bank of New York
<CAPTION>
California Florida Minnesota
GENERAL INFORMATION IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust....................... $ 3,050,000 $ 2,990,000 $ 3,125,000
Number of Units........................................................... 3,056 3,058 3,125
Fractional Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit....................... 1/3,056 1/3,058 1/3,125
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit <F1>.................. $ 998.04 $ 977.76 $ 1,000.00
Public Offering Price:
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities in Portfolio...................... $ 2,882,320 $ 2,879,026 $ 2,942,217
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities per Unit.......................... $ 943.17 $ 941.47 $ 941.51
Sales Charge <F2>........................................................ $ 48.59 $ 48.51 $ 48.51
Purchased Interest <F3>.................................................. $ 25,184 $ 30,639 $ 31,190
Purchased Interest per Unit <F3>......................................... $ 8.24 $ 10.02 $ 9.98
Public Offering Price per Unit <F3>...................................... $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit, including Purchased Interest <F3>.............. $ 943.63 $ 944.10 $ 943.64
Secondary Market Repurchase Price per Unit, including
Purchased Interest <F3>.................................................. $ 951.41 $ 951.49 $ 951.49
Excess of Public Offering Price per Unit Over Redemption Price per Unit... $ 56.37 $ 55.90 $ 56.36
Excess of Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price per Unit Over Redemption
Price per Unit........................................................... $ 7.78 $ 7.39 $ 7.85
Minimum Value of the Trust under which Trust Agreement may be
terminated............................................................... $ 610,000 $ 598,000 $ 625,000
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Minimum Principal Distribution..........$1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date...................November 3, 1994
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee......Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee<F4>...$0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made as
of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock Exchange
next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of Units or receipt
by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
<FN>
<F1>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a number
of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000 principal amount
of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand, in determining the
number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT
Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity and IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trusts, has elected not to follow this format but rather to
provide that number of Units which will establish as close as possible as of
the Date of Deposit a Public Offering Price per Unit of $1,000. For IM-IT
Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity and
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand, each unit represents
$1,000 principal amount of underlying securities in such Trust on the Date of
Deposit.
<F2>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public Offering
Price per Unit (excluding Purchased Interest) and in parenthesis as a
percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are as follows:
a State Trust (other than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) - 4.9%
(5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust - 4.3% (4.493%); an IM-IT
Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); an IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust or a
State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust - 3.0% (3.093%).
<F3>Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid interest that has accrued on the
Bonds from the later of the last payment date on the Bonds or the date of
issuance thereof through the First Settlement Date and is included in the
calculation of the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest will be
distributed to Unitholders as Units are redeemed or Securities mature or are
called. Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First Settlement Date
will pay accrued interest from such date to the date of settlement (normally
five business days after order) less distributions from the Interest Account
subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For purchases settling on the First
Settlement Date, no accrued interest will be added to the Public Offering
Price other than the Purchased Interest already included therein. After the
initial offering period, the Sponsor's Repurchase Price per Unit will be
determined as described under the caption "Public Offering--Market for
Units."
<F4>Such fee is based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities in each
Trust on the Date of Deposit for the first year and as of the close of
business on January 1 for each year thereafter.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
168th INSURED MULTI-SERIES
Summary of Essential Financial Information
At the Close of Business on the day before the Date
of Deposit: October 26, 1994
(except for the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time
on the Date of Deposit: October 27, 1994)
Sponsor: Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
Evaluator: American Portfolio Evaluation Services
(A division of a subsidiary of the Sponsor)
Trustee: The Bank of New York
<CAPTION>
New York
IM-IT
Intermediate
Laddered New York Pennsylvania
GENERAL INFORMATION Maturity Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust....................... $ 3,000,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 3,055,000
Number of Units........................................................... 3,000 3,093 3,104
Fractional Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit....................... 1/3,000 1/3,093 1/3,104
Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities per Unit <F1>.................. $ 1,000.00 $ 1,018.43 $ 984.21
Public Offering Price: ...................................................
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities in Portfolio...................... $ 2,914,678 $ 2,911,081 $ 2,921,586
Aggregate Offering Price of Securities per Unit.......................... $ 971.56 $ 941.18 $ 941.23
Sales Charge <F2>........................................................ $ 30.04 $ 48.50 $ 48.50
Purchased Interest <F3>.................................................. $ 24,542 $ 31,929 $ 31,886
Purchased Interest per Unit <F3>......................................... $ 8.18 $ 10.32 $ 10.27
Public Offering Price per Unit <F3>...................................... $ 1,009.78 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Redemption Price per Unit, including Purchased Interest <F3>.............. $ 972.31 $ 943.90 $ 943.76
Secondary Market Repurchase Price per Unit, including
Purchased Interest <F3>.................................................. $ 979.74 $ 951.50 $ 951.50
Excess of Public Offering Price per Unit Over Redemption Price per Unit... $ 37.47 $ 56.10 $ 56.24
Excess of Sponsor's Initial Repurchase Price per Unit Over Redemption
Price per Unit........................................................... $ 7.43 $ 7.60 $ 7.94
Minimum Value of the Trust under which Trust Agreement may be
terminated............................................................... $ 600,000 $ 630,000 $ 611,000
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Minimum Principal Distribution..........$1.00 per Unit
First Settlement Date...................November 3, 1994
Evaluator's Annual Supervisory Fee...... Maximum of $0.25 per Unit
Evaluator's Annual Evaluation Fee<F4>...$0.30 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Evaluations for purpose of sale, purchase or redemption of Units are made as
of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock Exchange
next following receipt of an order for a sale or purchase of Units or receipt
by The Bank of New York of Units tendered for redemption.
<FN>
<F1>Many unit investment trusts comprised of municipal securities issue a number
of units such that each unit represents approximately $1,000 principal amount
of underlying securities. The Sponsor, on the other hand, in determining the
number of Units for each Trust, other than IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT
Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity and IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trusts, has elected not to follow this format but rather to
provide that number of Units which will establish as close as possible as of
the Date of Deposit a Public Offering Price per Unit of $1,000. For IM-IT
Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity and
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts, on the other hand, each unit represents
$1,000 principal amount of underlying securities in such Trust on the Date of
Deposit.
<F2>Sales charges for the Trusts, expressed as a percentage of the Public Offering
Price per Unit (excluding Purchased Interest) and in parenthesis as a
percentage of the aggregate offering price of the Securities, are as follows:
a State Trust (other than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) - 4.9%
(5.152%); an IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust - 4.3% (4.493%); an IM-IT
Intermediate Trust - 3.9% (4.058%); an IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust or a
State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust - 3.0% (3.093%).
<F3>Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid interest that has accrued on the
Bonds from the later of the last payment date on the Bonds or the date of
issuance thereof through the First Settlement Date and is included in the
calculation of the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest will be
distributed to Unitholders as Units are redeemed or Securities mature or are
called. Anyone ordering Units for settlement after the First Settlement Date
will pay accrued interest from such date to the date of settlement (normally
five business days after order) less distributions from the Interest Account
subsequent to the First Settlement Date. For purchases settling on the First
Settlement Date, no accrued interest will be added to the Public Offering
Price other than the Purchased Interest already included therein. After the
initial offering period, the Sponsor's Repurchase Price per Unit will be
determined as described under the caption "Public Offering--Market for
Units."
<F4>Such fee is based on the outstanding principal amount of Securities in each
Trust on the Date of Deposit for the first year and as of the close of
business on January 1 for each year thereafter.
</TABLE>
SETTLEMENT OF BONDS IN THE TRUSTS
The Fund. Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series (the
"Fund"), was created under the laws of the State of New York pursuant
to a Trust Indenture and Agreement (the "Trust Agreement"), dated the
Date of Deposit, among Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as Sponsor, American Portfolio
Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory
Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
The Fund consists of six separate portfolios of delivery statements relating
to contracts to purchase interest-bearing obligations issued by or on behalf
of states and territories of the United States, and political subdivisions and
authorities thereof, the interest on which is, in the opinion of recognized
bond counsel to the issuing authorities, excludable from gross income for
Federal income tax under existing law. All issuers of Securities in a State
Trust are located in the State for which such Trust is named or in United
States territories or possessions and their public authorities; consequently,
in the opinion of recognized bond counsel to such State issuers, the related
interest earned on such Securities is exempt to the extent indicated from
state and local taxes of such State. With the exception of the New York and
Pennsylvania Trusts, Units of such Trusts may be purchased only by residents
of the State for which such Trust is named. Units of a New York Trust may be
purchased by residents of New York, Connecticut, Florida and Massachusetts.
Units of a Pennsylvania Trust may be purchased by residents of Pennsylvania,
Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, New York, Ohio and West Virginia. On the Date
of Deposit, the Sponsor deposited with the Trustee the aggregate principal
amount of Securities in each Trust as indicated under "General
Information--Principal Amount (Par Value) of Securities in Trust"in the
"Summary of Essential Financial Information". Such Securities consist
of delivery statements relating to contracts for the purchase of certain
interest-bearing obligations and cash, cash equivalents and/or irrevocable
letters of credit issued by a financial institution in the amount required for
such purchases. Thereafter, the Trustee, in exchange for the Securities so
deposited, delivered to the Sponsor the certificates evidencing the ownership
of the number of Units in each Trust as indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information."Unless otherwise terminated as provided
herein, the Trust Agreement for any State Trust (other than a State
Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) will terminate at the end of the
calendar year prior to the fiftieth anniversary of its execution, and the
Trust Agreement for any IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, IM-IT Intermediate
Trust, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust or IM-IT Short Intermediate
Trust will terminate at the end of the calendar year prior to the twentieth
anniversary of its execution.
The portfolio of any State Trust (other than a State Intermediate Laddered
Maturity Trust) consists of Bonds maturing approximately 15 to 40 years from
the Date of Deposit. The approximate range of maturities from the Date of
Deposit for Bonds in any IM-IT Limited Maturity Trust, IM-IT Intermediate
Trust, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust and IM-IT Short Intermediate
Trust is 12 to 15 years, 5 to 15 years, 5 to 10 years and 3 to 7 years,
respectively. The dollar-weighted average maturity of the Bonds in any IM-IT
Intermediate Trust, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust and IM-IT Short
Intermediate Trust is less than or equal to 10 years, 10 years and 5 years,
respectively.
The portfolio of any State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust is structured
so that approximately 20% of the Bonds contained in such portfolio will mature
each year, commencing in approximately the fifth year of the Trust, entitling
each Unitholder to a return of principal. This return of principal may offer
Unitholders the opportunity to respond to changing economic conditions and to
specific financial needs that may arise between the fifth and tenth years of a
State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust. However, the flexibility provided
by the return of principal may at the same time eliminate a Unitholder's
ability to reinvest the amount returned at a rate as high as the implicit
yield on the obligations which matured.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be "zero coupon"
bonds. Zero coupon bonds are purchased at a deep discount because the buyer
receives only the right to receive a final payment at the maturity of the bond
and does not receive any periodic interest payments. The effect of owning deep
discount bonds which do not make current interest payments (such as the zero
coupon bonds) is that a fixed yield is earned not only on the original
investment but also, in effect, on all discount earned during the life of such
obligation. This implicit reinvestment of earnings at the same rate eliminates
the risk of being unable to reinvest the income on such obligation at a rate
as high as the implicit yield on the discount obligation, but at the same time
eliminates the holder's ability to reinvest at higher rates in the future. For
this reason, zero coupon bonds are subject to substantially greater price
fluctuations during periods of changing market interest rates than are
securities of comparable quality which pay interest.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may have been purchased on a
"when, as and if issued"or "delayed delivery"basis. See
footnote (5) in "Notes to Portfolios". The delivery of any such
Securities may be delayed or may not occur. Interest on these Securities
begins accruing to the benefit of Unitholders on their respective dates of
delivery. To the extent any Securities are actually delivered to the Fund
after their respective expected dates of delivery, Unitholders who purchase
their Units prior to the date such Securities are actually delivered to the
Trustee would be required to adjust their tax basis in their Units for a
portion of the interest accruing on such Securities during the interval
between their purchase of Units and the actual delivery of such Securities. As
a result of any such adjustment, the Estimated Current Returns during the
first year would be slightly lower than those stated herein which would be the
returns after the first year, assuming the portfolio of a Trust and estimated
annual expenses other than that of the Trustee (which may be reduced in the
first year only) do not vary from that set forth under "Per Unit
Information"for the applicable Trust. Holders of the Units will be "
at risk"with respect to all Securities in the portfolios including "
when, as and if issued"and "delayed delivery"Securities (i.e.,
may derive either gain or loss from fluctuations in the evaluation of such
Securities) from the date they commit for Units. For a discussion of the
Sponsor's obligations in the event of the failure of any contract for the
purchase of any of the Securities and limited right to substitute other
tax-exempt bonds to replace any failed contract, see "Replacement
Bonds"below.
Each Unit initially offered represents the fractional undivided interest in
the principal and net income of a Trust indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information". To the extent that any Units are
redeemed by the Trustee, the fractional undivided interest in a Trust
represented by each unredeemed Unit will increase, although the actual
interest in such Trust represented by such fraction will remain unchanged.
Units will remain outstanding until redeemed upon tender to the Trustee by
Unitholders, which may include the Sponsor or the Underwriters, or until the
termination of the Trust Agreement.
Objectives and Securities Selection. The objectives of the Fund are income
exempt from Federal income taxation and, in the case of a State Trust, Federal
and state income taxation and conservation of capital through an investment in
diversified portfolios of Federal and state tax-exempt obligations. A State
Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust has additional objectives of providing
protection against changes in interest rates and investment flexibility
through an investment in a laddered portfolio of intermediate-term
interest-bearing obligations with maturities ranging from approximately 5 to
10 years in which roughly 20% of the obligations contained in such portfolio
will mature each year commencing in approximately the fifth year of the Trust.
There is, of course, no guarantee that the Trusts will achieve their
respective objectives. The Fund may be an appropriate investment vehicle for
investors who desire to participate in a portfolio of tax-exempt fixed income
securities with greater diversification than they might be able to acquire
individually. In addition, securities of the type deposited in the Fund are
often not available in small amounts.
Insurance guaranteeing the timely payment, when due, of all principal and
interest on the Bonds in each Insured Trust has been obtained by such Trust
from either AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity"), Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty"or "FGIC") or
a combination thereof (collectively, the "Portfolio Insurers"), or by
the issuer of such Bonds, by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor
prior to the deposit of such Bonds in such Trust from (1) AMBAC Indemnity or
one of its subsidiaries, American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation ("
AMBAC") or MGIC Indemnity Corporation ("MGIC Indemnity"), (2)
Financial Guaranty, (3) Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation ("
MBIA"), (4) Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance Company ("BIG"), (5)
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. ("National
Union"), (6) Capital Guaranty Insurance Company ("Capital Guaranty"
), (7) Capital Markets Assurance Corporation ("CapMAC") and/or (8)
Financial Security Assurance Inc. ("Financial Security"or "
FSA") (collectively, the "Preinsured Bond Insurers") (see "
Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts").
Insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is effective only while the Bonds thus
insured are held in such Trust. The Trustee has the right to acquire permanent
insurance from a Portfolio Insurer with respect to each Bond insured by the
respective Portfolio Insurer under a Trust portfolio insurance policy.
Insurance relating to Bonds insured by the issuer, by a prior owner of such
Bonds or by the Sponsor is effective so long as such Bonds are outstanding.
Bonds insured under a policy of insurance obtained by the issuer, by a prior
owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor from one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers
(the "Preinsured Bonds") are not additionally insured by an Insured
Trust. No representation is made as to any insurer's ability to meet its
commitments.
Neither the Public Offering Price nor any evaluation of Units for purposes of
repurchases or redemptions reflects any element of value for the insurance
obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, unless Bonds are in default in payment
of principal or interest or in significant risk of such default. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price". On the other
hand, the value, if any, of Preinsured Bond insurance is reflected and
included in the market value of such Bonds.
In order for bonds to be eligible for insurance, they must have credit
characteristics which would qualify them for at least the Standard & Poor's
Corporation rating of "BBB-"or at least the Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. rating of "Baa", which in brief represent the lowest
ratings for securities of investment grade (see "Other
Matters--Description of Securities Ratings"). Insurance is not a
substitute for the basic credit of an issuer, but supplements the existing
credit and provides additional security therefor. If an issue is accepted for
insurance, a non-cancellable policy for the prompt payment of interest and
principal on the bonds, when due, is issued by the insurer. Any premium or
premiums relating to Preinsured Bond insurance is paid by the issuer, by a
prior owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor and a monthly premium is paid by
an Insured Trust for the portfolio insurance, if any, obtained by such Trust.
The Trustee has the right to obtain permanent insurance from a Portfolio
Insurer in connection with the sale of a Bond insured under the insurance
policy obtained from the respective Portfolio Insurer by an Insured Trust upon
the payment of a single predetermined insurance premium from the proceeds of
the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any Bond in an Insured Trust is eligible
to be sold on an insured basis. All Bonds insured by the Portfolio Insurers
and the Preinsured Bond Insurers receive a "AAA"rating by Standard &
Poor's Corporation. See "Unitholder Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds
in the Insured Trusts".
In selecting Securities for the Trusts the following facts, among others, were
considered by the Sponsor: (a) either the Standard & Poor's Corporation rating
of the Securities was in no case less than "BBB-"in the case of the
Insured Trusts, or the Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating of the
Securities was in no case less than "Baa"in the case of the Insured
Trusts, including provisional or conditional ratings, respectively, or, if not
rated, the Securities had, in the opinion of the Sponsor, credit
characteristics sufficiently similar to the credit characteristics of
interest-bearing tax-exempt obligations that were so rated as to be acceptable
for acquisition by the Fund (see "Other Matters--Description of Securities
Ratings"), (b) the prices of the Securities relative to other bonds of
comparable quality and maturity, (c) the diversification of Securities as to
purpose of issue and location of issuer and (d) with respect to the Insured
Trusts, the availability and cost of insurance for the prompt payment of
principal and interest, when due, on the Securities. Subsequent to the Date of
Deposit, a Security may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below
the minimum required as of the Date of Deposit. Neither event requires
elimination of such Security from the portfolio of a Trust but may be
considered in the Sponsor's determination as to whether or not to direct the
Trustee to dispose of the Security (see "Trust Administration--Fund
Administration and Expenses--Portfolio Administration").
To the best knowledge of the Sponsor, there is no litigation pending as of the
Date of Deposit in respect of any Securities which might reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect upon the Fund or any of the Trusts.
At any time after the Date of Deposit, litigation may be initiated on a
variety of grounds with respect to Securities in the Fund. Such litigation,
as, for example, suits challenging the issuance of pollution control revenue
bonds under environmental protection statutes, may affect the validity of such
Securities or the tax-free nature of the interest thereon. While the outcome
of litigation of such nature can never be entirely predicted, the Fund has
received or will receive opinions of bond counsel to the issuing authorities
of each Security on the date of issuance to the effect that such Securities
have been validly issued and that the interest thereon is exempt from Federal
income tax. In addition, other factors may arise from time to time which
potentially may impair the ability of issuers to meet obligations undertaken
with respect to the Securities.
Risk Factors. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be general
obligations of a governmental entity that are backed by the taxing power of
such entity. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with
an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which
such an investment may entail. All other Bonds in the Trusts are revenue bonds
payable from the income of a specific project or authority and are not
supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. General obligation bonds are
secured by the issuer's pledge of its faith, credit and taxing power for the
payment of principal and interest. Revenue bonds, on the other hand, are
payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of
facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise tax or
other specific revenue source. There are, of course, variations in the
security of the different Bonds in the Fund, both within a particular
classification and between classifications, depending on numerous factors. See
"General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which derive
their payments from mortgage loans. Certain of such housing bonds may be FHA
insured or may be single family mortgage revenue bonds issued for the purpose
of acquiring from originating financial institutions notes secured by
mortgages on residences located within the issuer's boundaries and owned by
persons of low or moderate income. In view of this an investment in such a
Trust should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such
issuers and the risks which such an investment may entail. Mortgage loans are
generally partially or completely prepaid prior to their final maturities as a
result of events such as sale of the mortgaged premises, default, condemnation
or casualty loss. Because these bonds are subject to extraordinary mandatory
redemption in whole or in part from such prepayments of mortgage loans, a
substantial portion of such bonds will probably be redeemed prior to their
scheduled maturities or even prior to their ordinary call dates. Extraordinary
mandatory redemption without premium could also result from the failure of the
originating financial institutions to make mortgage loans in sufficient
amounts within a specified time period. Additionally, unusually high rates of
default on the underlying mortgage loans may reduce revenues available for the
payment of principal of or interest on such mortgage revenue bonds. These
bonds were issued under Section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code, which
Section contains certain requirements relating to the use of the proceeds of
such bonds in order for the interest on such bonds to retain its tax-exempt
status. In each case the issuer of the bonds has covenanted to comply with
applicable requirements and bond counsel to such issuer has issued an opinion
that the interest on the bonds is exempt from Federal income tax under
existing laws and regulations. Certain issuers of housing bonds have
considered various ways to redeem bonds they have issued prior to the stated
first redemption dates for such bonds. In connection with the housing bonds
held by the Fund, the Sponsor at the Date of Deposit is not aware that any of
the respective issuers of such Bonds are actively considering the redemption
of such Bonds prior to their respective stated initial call dates. See "
General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be health care revenue
bonds. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Ratings of bonds issued for health care facilities
are often based on feasibility studies that contain projections of occupancy
levels, revenues and expenses. A facility's gross receipts and net income
available for debt service may be affected by future events and conditions
including, among other things, demand for services and the ability of the
facility to provide the services required, physicians' confidence in the
facility, management capabilities, competition with other health care
facilities, efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates,
legislation establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, the cost and
possible unavailability of malpractice insurance, the funding of Medicare,
Medicaid and other similar third party payor programs, government regulation
and the termination or restriction of governmental financial assistance,
including that associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third
party payor programs. Pursuant to recent Federal legislation, Medicare
reimbursements are currently calculated on a prospective basis utilizing a
single nationwide schedule of rates. Prior to such legislation Medicare
reimbursements were based on the actual costs incurred by the health facility.
The current legislation may adversely affect reimbursements to hospitals and
other facilities for services provided under the Medicare program. Such
adverse changes also may adversely affect the ratings of Securities held in
the portfolios of the Fund; however, because of the insurance obtained by each
of the Insured Trusts, the "AAA"rating of the Units of each of the
Insured Trusts would not be affected. See "General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of public
utility issuers, including those selling wholesale and retail electric power
and gas. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. General problems of such issuers would include the
difficulty in financing large construction programs in an inflationary period,
the limitations on operations and increased costs and delays attributable to
environmental considerations, the difficulty of the capital market in
absorbing utility debt, the difficulty in obtaining fuel at reasonable prices
and the effect of energy conservation. All of such issuers have been
experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees. In addition,
Federal, state and municipal governmental authorities may from time to time
review existing, and impose additional, regulations governing the licensing,
construction and operation of nuclear power plants, which may adversely affect
the ability of the issuers of certain of the Bonds in the portfolio to make
payments of principal and/or interest on such Bonds. See "General"for
each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of issuers
whose revenues are derived from the sale of water and/or sewerage services. In
view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with an
understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which such
an investment may entail. Such Bonds are generally payable from user fees. The
problems of such issuers include the ability to obtain timely and adequate
rate increases, population decline resulting in decreased user fees, the
difficulty of financing large construction programs, the limitations on
operations and increased costs and delays attributable to environmental
considerations, the increasing difficulty of obtaining or discovering new
supplies of fresh water, the effect of conservation programs and the impact of
"no-growth"zoning ordinances. All of such issuers have been
experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees. See "
General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be industrial revenue bonds
("IRBs"). In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made
with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks
which such an investment may entail. IRBs have generally been issued under
bond resolutions pursuant to which the revenues and receipts payable under the
arrangements with the operator of a particular project have been assigned and
pledged to purchasers. In some cases, a mortgage on the underlying project may
have been granted as security for the IRBs. Regardless of the structure,
payment of IRBs is solely dependent upon the creditworthiness of the corporate
operator of the project or corporate guarantor. Corporate operators or
guarantors may be affected by many factors which may have an adverse impact on
the credit quality of the particular company or industry. These include
cyclicality of revenues and earnings, regulatory and environmental
restrictions, litigation resulting from accidents or environmentally-caused
illnesses, extensive competition and financial deterioration resulting from a
corporate restructuring pursuant to a leveraged buy-out, takeover or
otherwise. Such a restructuring may result in the operator of a project
becoming highly leveraged which may impact on such operator's creditworthiness
which in turn would have an adverse impact on the rating and/or market value
of such Bonds. Further, the possibility of such a restructuring may have an
adverse impact on the market for and consequently the value of such Bonds,
even though no actual takeover or other action is ever contemplated or
effected. See "General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations that are
secured by lease payments of a governmental entity (hereinafter called "
lease obligations"). Lease obligations are often in the form of
certificates of participation. In view of this an investment in such a Trust
should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers
and the risks which such an investment may entail. Although the lease
obligations do not constitute general obligations of the municipality for
which the municipality's taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is
ordinarily backed by the municipality's covenant to appropriate for and make
the payments due under the lease obligation. However, certain lease
obligations contain "non-appropriation"clauses which provide that the
municipality has no obligation to make lease payments in future years unless
money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis. A governmental
entity that enters into such a lease agreement cannot obligate future
governments to appropriate for and make lease payments but covenants to take
such action as is necessary to include any lease payments due in its budgets
and to make the appropriations therefor. A governmental entity's failure to
appropriate for and to make payments under its lease obligation could result
in insufficient funds available for payment of the obligations secured
thereby. Although "non-appropriation"lease obligations are secured by
the leased property, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure
might prove difficult. See "General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations of issuers
which are, or which govern the operation of, schools, colleges and
universities and whose revenues are derived mainly from ad valorem taxes or
for higher education systems, from tuition, dormitory revenues, grants and
endowments. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be made with
an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the risks which
such an investment may entail. General problems relating to school bonds
include litigation contesting the State constitutionality of financing public
education in part from ad valorem taxes, thereby creating a disparity in
educational funds available to schools in wealthy areas and schools in poor
areas. Litigation or legislation on this issue may affect the sources of funds
available for the payment of school bonds in the Trusts. General problems
relating to college and university obligations include the prospect of a
declining percentage of the population consisting of "college"age
individuals, possible inability to raise tuitions and fees sufficiently to
cover increased operating costs, the uncertainty of continued receipt of
Federal grants and state funding, and government legislation or regulations
which may adversely affect the revenues or costs of such issuers. All of such
issuers have been experiencing certain of these problems in varying degrees.
See "General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which are
payable from and secured by revenues derived from the ownership and operation
of facilities such as airports, bridges, turnpikes, port authorities,
convention centers and arenas. In view of this an investment in such a Trust
should be made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers
and the risks which such an investment may entail. The major portion of an
airport's gross operating income is generally derived from fees received from
signatory airlines pursuant to use agreements which consist of annual payments
for leases, occupancy of certain terminal space and service fees. Airport
operating income may therefore be affected by the ability of the airlines to
meet their obligations under the use agreements. The air transport industry is
experiencing significant variations in earnings and traffic, due to increased
competition, excess capacity, increased costs, deregulation, traffic
constraints and other factors, and several airlines are experiencing severe
financial difficulties. The Sponsor cannot predict what effect these industry
conditions may have on airport revenues which are dependent for payment on the
financial condition of the airlines and their usage of the particular airport
facility. Similarly, payment on Bonds related to other facilities is dependent
on revenues from the projects, such as user fees from ports, tolls on
turnpikes and bridges and rents from buildings. Therefore, payment may be
adversely affected by reduction in revenues due to such factors as increased
cost of maintenance, decreased use of a facility, lower cost of alternative
modes of transportation, scarcity of fuel and reduction or loss of rents. See
"General"for each Trust.
Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be obligations which are
payable from and secured by revenues derived from the operation of resource
recovery facilities. In view of this an investment in such a Trust should be
made with an understanding of the characteristics of such issuers and the
risks which such an investment may entail. Resource recovery facilities are
designed to process solid waste, generate steam and convert steam to
electricity. Resource recovery bonds may be subject to extraordinary optional
redemption at par upon the occurrence of certain circumstances, including but
not limited to: destruction or condemnation of a project; contracts relating
to a project becoming void, unenforceable or impossible to perform; changes in
the economic availability of raw materials, operating supplies or facilities
necessary for the operation of a project or technological or other unavoidable
changes adversely affecting the operation of a project; administrative or
judicial actions which render contracts relating to the projects void,
unenforceable or impossible to perform; or impose unreasonable burdens or
excessive liabilities. The Sponsor cannot predict the causes or likelihood of
the redemption of resource recovery bonds in such a Trust prior to the stated
maturity of the Bonds. See "General"for each Trust.
Replacement Bonds. Because certain of the Securities in the Fund may from time
to time under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will mature in
accordance with their terms and because the proceeds from such events will be
distributed to Unitholders and will not be reinvested, no assurance can be
given that any Trust will retain for any length of time its present size and
composition. Neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee shall be liable in any way
for any default, failure or defect in any Security. In the event of a failure
to deliver any Security that has been purchased for the Fund under a contract,
including those Securities purchased on a "when, as and if issued"
basis ("Failed Bonds"), the Sponsor is authorized under the Trust
Agreement to direct the Trustee to acquire other bonds ("Replacement
Bonds") to make up the original corpus of the Fund.
The Replacement Bonds must be purchased within 20 days after delivery of the
notice of the failed contract and the purchase price (exclusive of accrued
interest) may not exceed the amount of funds reserved for the purchase of the
Failed Bonds. The Replacement Bonds (i) must be tax-exempt bonds issued by
states or territories of the United States or political subdivisions thereof
and, in the case of replacement of bonds in a State Trust, shall have the
benefit of an exemption from state taxation of interest to an extent equal to
or greater than that of the bonds they replace, (ii) must have a fixed
maturity date of at least 10 years in the case of a State Trust (other than a
State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) or, in the case of an IM-IT
Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity or
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust, must have a fixed maturity date within the
range set forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the
Trusts--The Fund", (iii) must be purchased at a price that results in a
yield to maturity and in a current return, in each case as of the Date of
Deposit, at least equal to that of the Failed Bonds, (iv) shall not be "
when, as and if issued"bonds, (v) must be rated "BBB-"or better
in the case of the Insured Trusts by Standard & Poor's Corporation or "
Baa"or better in the case of the Insured Trusts by Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. and (vi) with respect to each Insured Trust, must be insured by
one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers or be eligible for (and when acquired be
insured under) the insurance obtained by such Insured Trust. Whenever a
Replacement Bond has been acquired for the Fund, the Trustee shall, within
five days thereafter, notify all Unitholders of the affected Trust of the
acquisition of the Replacement Bond and shall, on the next monthly
distribution date which is more than 30 days thereafter, make a pro rata
distribution of the amount, if any, by which the cost to the affected Trust of
the Failed Bond exceeded the cost of the Replacement Bond plus accrued
interest. Once the original corpus of a Trust is acquired, the Trustee will
have no power to vary the investment of the Trust; i.e., the Trust will have
no managerial power to take advantage of market variation to improve a
Unitholder's investment.
If the right of limited substitution described in the preceding paragraph
shall not be utilized to acquire Replacement Bonds in the event of a failed
contract, the Sponsor will refund the sales charge attributable to such Failed
Bonds to all Unitholders of the affected Trust and distribute the principal,
Purchased Interest and accrued interest (at the coupon rate of such Failed
Bonds to the date the Failed Bonds are removed from the Fund) attributable to
such Failed Bonds not more than 30 days after such removal or such earlier
time as the Trustee in its sole discretion deems to be in the interest of the
Unitholders. All such interest paid to a Unitholder which accrued after the
expected date of settlement for purchase of his Units will be paid by the
Sponsor and accordingly will not be treated as tax-exempt income. In the event
a Replacement Bond should not be acquired by the Fund, the Estimated Net
Annual Interest Income per Unit for the affected Trust would be reduced and
the Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return thereon might be
lowered. In addition, Unitholders should be aware that they may not be able at
the time of receipt of such principal to reinvest such proceeds in other
securities at a yield equal to or in excess of the yield which such proceeds
were earning to Unitholders in the affected Trust.
Bond Redemptions. Certain of the Bonds in certain of the Trusts may be subject
to redemption prior to their stated maturity date pursuant to sinking fund
provisions, call provisions or extraordinary optional or mandatory redemption
provisions or otherwise. A sinking fund is a reserve fund accumulated over a
period of time for retirement of debt. A callable debt obligation is one which
is subject to redemption or refunding prior to maturity at the option of the
issuer. A refunding is a method by which a debt obligation is redeemed, at or
before maturity, by the proceeds of a new debt obligation. In general, call
provisions are more likely to be exercised when the offering side valuation is
at a premium over par than when it is at a discount from par. The exercise of
redemption or call provisions will (except to the extent the proceeds of the
called Bonds are used to pay for Unit redemptions) result in the distribution
of principal and may result in a reduction in the amount of subsequent
interest distributions; it may also affect the current return on Units of the
Trust involved. Each Trust portfolio contains a listing of the sinking fund
and call provisions, if any, with respect to each of the debt obligations.
Extraordinary optional redemptions and mandatory redemptions result from the
happening of certain events. Generally, events that may permit the
extraordinary optional redemption of Bonds or may require the mandatory
redemption of Bonds include, among others: a final determination that the
interest on the Bonds is taxable; the substantial damage or destruction by
fire or other casualty of the project for which the proceeds of the Bonds were
used; an exercise by a local, state or Federal governmental unit of its power
of eminent domain to take all or substantially all of the project for which
the proceeds of the Bonds were used; changes in the economic availability of
raw materials, operating supplies or facilities or technological or other
changes which render the operation of the project for which the proceeds of
the Bonds were used uneconomic; changes in law or an administrative or
judicial decree which renders the performance of the agreement under which the
proceeds of the Bonds were made available to finance the project impossible or
which creates unreasonable burdens or which imposes excessive liabilities,
such as taxes, not imposed on the date the Bonds are issued on the issuer of
the Bonds or the user of the proceeds of the Bonds; an administrative or
judicial decree which requires the cessation of a substantial part of the
operations of the project financed with the proceeds of the Bonds; an
overestimate of the costs of the project to be financed with the proceeds of
the Bonds resulting in excess proceeds of the Bonds which may be applied to
redeem Bonds; or an underestimate of a source of funds securing the Bonds
resulting in excess funds which may be applied to redeem Bonds. The issuer of
certain Bonds in a Trust may have sold or reserved the right to sell, upon the
satisfaction of certain conditions, to third parties all or any portion of its
rights to call Bonds in accordance with the stated redemption provisions of
such Bonds. In such a case the issuer no longer has the right to call the
Bonds for redemption unless it reacquires the rights from such third party. A
third party pursuant to these rights may exercise the redemption provisions
with respect to a Bond at a time when the issuer of the Bond might not have
called a Bond for redemption had it not sold such rights. The Sponsor is
unable to predict all of the circumstances which may result in such redemption
of an issue of Bonds. See "Portfolio"for each Trust and footnote (3)
in the "Notes to Portfolios". See also the discussion of single family
mortgage and multi-family revenue bonds above for more information on the call
provisions of such bonds.
Distributions. Distributions of interest received by the Fund, pro rated on an
annual basis, will be made monthly. The first such distribution will be in the
amount indicated under "Per Unit Information"for the applicable Trust
and will be made on the fifteenth day of the month indicated under "
Initial Distribution"therein to Unitholders of record on the first day of
such month. Distribution of funds from the Principal Account, if any, will
also be made monthly, except under certain special circumstances (see "
Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Distributions of Interest and
Principal").
Certificates. The Trustee is authorized to treat as the record owner of Units
that person who is registered as such owner on the books of the Trustee.
Ownership of Units of each Trust is evidenced by separate registered
certificates executed by the Trustee and the Sponsor. Certificates are
transferable by presentation and surrender to the Trustee properly endorsed or
accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer. A Unitholder
must sign exactly as his name appears on the face of the certificate with the
signature guaranteed by a participant in the Securities Transfer Agents
Medallion Program ("STAMP") or such other signature guaranty program
in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, as may be accepted by the
Trustee. In certain instances the Trustee may require additional documents
such as, but not limited to, trust instruments, certificates of death,
appointments as executor or administrator or certificates of corporate
authority. Certificates will be issued in denominations of one Unit or any
multiple thereof.
Although no such charge is now made or contemplated, the Trustee may require a
Unitholder to pay a reasonable fee for each certificate re-issued (other than
as a result of a change in plan of distribution) or transferred and to pay any
governmental charge that may be imposed in connection with each such transfer
or interchange. Destroyed, stolen, mutilated or lost certificates will be
replaced upon delivery to the Trustee of satisfactory indemnity, evidence of
ownership and payment of expenses incurred. Mutilated certificates must be
surrendered to the Trustee for replacement.
ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURNS AND ESTIMATED LONG-TERM RETURNS
As of the close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit (except for
the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of
Deposit) the Estimated Current Return and the Estimated Long-Term Return were
as set forth in the "Per Unit Information"for each Trust. Estimated
Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net annual interest
income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated net annual
interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and expenses of the
Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment, redemption,
maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering Price will
vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying Securities and with
changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no assurance that the
present Estimated Current Return will be realized in the future. Estimated
Long-Term Return is calculated using a formula which (1) takes into
consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the
market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements of all of the
Securities in a Trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales charge
associated with each Trust Unit. Since the market values and estimated
retirements of the Securities and the expenses of a Trust will change, there
is no assurance that the present Estimated Long-Term Return will be realized
in the future. The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are
expected to differ because the calculation of Estimated Long-Term Return
reflects the estimated date and amount of principal returned while the
Estimated Current Return calculation includes only net annual interest income
and Public Offering Price.
In order to acquire certain of the Securities contracted for by the Sponsor
for deposit in the Fund, it may be necessary for the Sponsor or Trustee to pay
on the settlement dates for delivery of such Securities amounts covering
accrued interest on such Securities which exceed (1) the amounts paid by
Unitholders and (2) the amounts which will be made available through cash
furnished by the Sponsor on the Date of Deposit, which amount of cash may
exceed the interest which would accrue to the First Settlement Date. The
Trustee has agreed to pay for any amounts necessary to cover any such excess
and will be reimbursed therefor, without interest, when funds become available
from interest payments on the particular Securities with respect to which such
payments may have been made. Also, since interest on any "when, as and if
issued"Securities does not begin accruing as tax-exempt interest income
to the benefit of Unitholders until their respective dates of delivery, the
Trustee may, in order to maintain (or in some cases approach) for the
Unitholders the same estimated net annual interest incomes during the first
year of the Trusts' operations as is indicated under "Per Unit
Information"for the applicable Trust, reduce its fee (and to the extent
necessary pay Trust expenses) in an amount equal to that indicated under "
Per Unit Information"for the applicable Trust.
INTEREST EARNING SCHEDULE
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Interest Income. The estimated net annual
interest income is based on 360 days. To account for the estimated net annual
interest income per Unit in a Trust, it is necessary to use the following
information.
The beginning interest date for each Trust is November 3, 1994. The first
record date for each Trust (December 1, 1994) is 28 days from such date. The
daily rates of estimated net annual interest income per Unit are $.16719,
$.16149, $.16059, $.13056, $.16623 and $.16551 for the California IM-IT,
Florida IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
New York IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts, respectively. This amounts to
$4.68, $4.52, $4.50, $3.66, $4.65 and $4.63 for the California IM-IT, Florida
IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity, New
York IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts, respectively.
Utilizing the preceding information, the following procedure illustrates the
calculation of first year estimated net annual interest income per Unit for
the California IM-IT Trust:
The California IM-IT Trust accrues
$4.68 to the first record date plus
$50.20 which is 10 normal distributions at $5.02, and finally adding
$5.31 which has accrued from October 1, 1995 until November 3, 1995 which
completes the 360 day cycle (32 days times the daily factor)
Total $60.19 interest earned /$1,000.00 (Date of Deposit Public Offering
Price) = 6.02% Estimated Current Return as of the Date of Deposit.
PURCHASED AND ACCRUED INTEREST
Purchased Interest. Purchased Interest is a portion of the unpaid interest
that has accrued on the Securities from the later of the last payment date on
the Securities or the date of issuance thereof through the First Settlement
Date and is included in the calculation of the Public Offering Price.
Purchased Interest will be distributed to Unitholders as Units are redeemed or
Securities mature or are called. See "Summary of Essential Financial
Information"for the amount of Purchased Interest per Unit for each Trust.
Purchased Interest is an element of the price Unitholders will receive in
connection with the sale or redemption of Units prior to the termination of
the Trust.
Accrued Interest. Accrued interest is an accumulation of unpaid interest on
securities which generally is paid semi-annually, although the Trust accrues
such interest daily. Because of this, the Trust always has an amount of
interest earned but not yet collected by the Trustee. For this reason, with
respect to sales settling subsequent to the First Settlement Date, the Public
Offering Price of Units will have added to it the proportionate share of
accrued interest to the date of settlement. Unitholders will receive on the
next distribution date of the Trust the amount, if any, of accrued interest
paid on their Units.
As indicated in "Purchased Interest", accrued interest as of the First
Settlement Date includes Purchased Interest. In an effort to reduce the amount
of Purchased Interest which would otherwise have to be paid by Unitholders,
the Trustee may advance a portion of such accrued interest to the Sponsor as
the Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date. Consequently, the
amount of accrued interest to be added to the Public Offering Price of Units
will include only accrued interest from the First Settlement Date to the date
of settlement (other than the Purchased Interest already included therein),
less any distributions from the Interest Account subsequent to the First
Settlement Date. See "Public Offering--Distributions of Interest and
Principal."
Because of the varying interest payment dates of the Securities, accrued
interest at any point in time will be greater than the amount of interest
actually received by a Trust and distributed to Unitholders. If a Unitholder
sells or redeems all or a portion of his Units, he will be entitled to receive
his proportionate share of the Purchased Interest and accrued interest from
the purchaser of his Units. Since the Trustee has the use of the funds
(including Purchased Interest) held in the Interest Account for distributions
to Unitholders and since such Account is non-interest-bearing to Unitholders,
the Trustee benefits thereby.
PUBLIC OFFERING
General. Units are offered at the Public Offering Price which includes
Purchased Interest. During the initial offering period the Public Offering
Price is based on the offering prices of the Securities in each Trust and
includes a sales charge of 4.9% of the Public Offering Price (excluding
Purchased Interest) (5.152% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities)
for a State Trust (other than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust),
4.3% of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest) (4.493% of
the aggregate offering price of the Securities) for an IM-IT Limited Maturity
Trust, 3.9% of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest)
(4.058% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities) for an IM-IT
Intermediate Trust and 3.0% of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased
Interest) (3.093% of the aggregate offering price of the Securities) for an
IM-IT Short Intermediate Trust or a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity
Trust. After the initial public offering period, the secondary market Public
Offering Price is based on the bid prices of the Securities in each Trust and
includes a sales charge determined in accordance with the table set forth
below, which is based upon the dollar weighted average maturity of each Trust
plus in each case Purchased Interest and accrued interest, if any. For
purposes of computation, Bonds will be deemed to mature on their expressed
maturity dates unless: (a) the Bonds have been called for redemption or funds
or securities have been placed in escrow to redeem them on an earlier call
date, in which case such call date will be deemed to be the date upon which
they mature; or (b) such Bonds are subject to a "mandatory tender", in
which case such mandatory tender will be deemed to be the date upon which they
mature.
The effect of this method of sales charge computation will be that different
sales charge rates will be applied to each Trust based upon the dollar
weighted average maturity of such Trust's Portfolio, in accordance with the
following schedule:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Sales Charge Years To Maturity Sales Charge
Years To Maturity
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1 1.523 % 9 4.712%
2 2.041 10 4.932
3 2.564 11 4.932
4 3.199 12 4.932
5 3.842 13 5.374
6 4.058 14 5.374
7 4.275 15 5.374
8 4.493 16 to 30 6.045
</TABLE>
The sales charges in the above table are expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate bid prices of the Securities in a Trust. Expressed as a percent of
the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest), the sales charge on
a Trust consisting entirely of a portfolio of Bonds with 15 years to maturity
would be 5.10%. The sales charge applicable to quantity purchases during the
initial offering period is, however, reduced on a graduated basis to any
person acquiring 100 or more Units as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Dollar Amount of Sales
Charge Reduction Per Unit
<S> <C> <C>
State
(other than a
State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity
Aggregate Number of Trust)
Units Purchased and National
Quality Trusts Other Trusts
100-249 Units......... $ 4.00 $ 4.00
250-499 Units......... $ 6.00 $ 6.00
500-999 Units......... $ 14.00 $ 9.00
1,000 or more Units... $ 19.00 $ 11.00
</TABLE>
Any such reduced sales charge shall be the responsibility of the selling
Underwriter, broker, dealer or agent. The Sponsor will, however, increase the
concession or agency commission for such quantity purchases. See "Public
Offering--Unit Distribution". This reduced sales charge structure will
apply on all purchases by the same person from any one Underwriter or dealer
of units of Van Kampen Merritt-sponsored unit investment trusts which are
being offered in the initial offering period (a) on any one day (the "
Initial Purchase Date") or (b) on any day subsequent to the Initial
Purchase Date, if (1) the units purchased are of a unit investment trust
purchased on the Initial Purchase Date, and (2) the person purchasing the
units purchased a sufficient amount of units on the Initial Purchase Date to
qualify for a reduced sales charge on such date. In the event units of more
than one trust are purchased on the Initial Purchase Date, the aggregate
dollar amount of such purchases will be used to determine whether purchasers
are eligible for a reduced sales charge. Such aggregate dollar amount will be
divided by the public offering price per unit (on the day preceding the date
of purchase) of each respective trust purchased to determine the total number
of units which such amount could have purchased of each individual trust.
Purchasers must then consult the applicable trust's prospectus to determine
whether the total number of units which could have been purchased of a
specific trust would have qualified for a reduced sales charge and, if so
qualified, the amount of such reduction. Assuming a purchaser qualifies for a
sales charge reduction or reductions, to determine the applicable sales charge
reduction or reductions it is necessary to accumulate all purchases made on
the Initial Purchase Date and all purchases made in accordance with (b) above.
Units purchased in the name of the spouse of a purchaser or in the name of a
child of such purchaser under 21 years of age will be deemed for the purposes
of calculating the applicable sales charge to be additional purchases by the
purchaser. The reduced sales charges will also be applicable to a trustee or
other fiduciary purchasing securities for one or more trust estate or
fiduciary accounts. Employees of Van Kampen Merritt Inc. and its subsidiaries
may purchase Units of the Trust at the current Public Offering Price less the
underwriting commission during the initial offering period, and less the
dealer's concession for secondary market transactions. Registered
representatives of selling Underwriters may purchase Units of the Fund at the
current Public Offering Price less the underwriting commission during the
initial offering period, and less the dealer's concession for secondary market
transactions. Registered representatives of selling brokers, dealers, or
agents may purchase Units of the Fund at the current Public Offering Price
less the dealer's concession during the initial offering period and for
secondary market transactions.
Offering Price. Public Offering Price of the Units will vary from the amounts
stated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information"in
accordance with fluctuations in the prices of the underlying Securities in
each Trust.
As indicated above, the price of the Units as of the date the Securities were
deposited in each Trust was determined by adding to the aggregate offering
price of the Securities of a Trust an amount equal to the applicable sales
charge expressed as a percentage of the aggregate offering price of the
Securities plus Purchased Interest and dividing the sum so obtained by the
number of Units outstanding. This computation produced a gross underwriting
commission equal to such sales charge expressed as a percentage of the Public
Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest). Such price determination as of
the close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit (except for the
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit)
was made on the basis of an evaluation of the Securities in each Trust
prepared by Interactive Data Services, Inc., a firm regularly engaged in the
business of evaluating, quoting or appraising comparable securities. After the
close of business on the day before the Date of Deposit (except for the
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust as of 8:00 A.M. Central Time on the Date of Deposit)
and during the period of initial offering, the Evaluator will appraise or
cause to be appraised daily the value of the underlying Securities of each
Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days the New York Stock Exchange is open
for business and will adjust the Public Offering Price of the Units
commensurate with such appraisal. Such Public Offering Price will be effective
for all orders received at or prior to 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on each such
day. Orders received by the Trustee, Sponsor or any Underwriter for purchases,
sales or redemptions after that time, or on a day when the New York Stock
Exchange is closed, will be held until the next determination of price. For
secondary market sales the Public Offering Price per Unit will be equal to the
aggregate bid price of the Securities in the Trust plus an amount equal to the
applicable secondary market sales charge expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate bid price of the Securities plus Purchased Interest and dividing the
sum so attained by the number of Units then outstanding. This computation
produces a gross commission equal to such sales charge expressed as a
percentage of the Public Offering Price (excluding Purchased Interest). For
secondary market purposes such appraisal and adjustment with respect to a
Trust will be made by the Evaluator as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days in
which the New York Stock Exchange is open for each day on which any Unit of
such Trust is tendered for redemption, and it shall determine the aggregate
value of any Trust as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on such other days as may be
necessary.
The aggregate price of the Securities in each Trust has been and will be
determined on the basis of bid prices or offering prices, as is appropriate,
(a) on the basis of current market prices for the Securities obtained from
dealers or brokers who customarily deal in bonds comparable to those held by
the Fund; (b) if such prices are not available for any particular Securities,
on the basis of current market prices for comparable bonds; (c) by causing the
value of the Securities to be determined by others engaged in the practice of
evaluation, quoting or appraising comparable bonds; or (d) by any combination
of the above. Market prices of the Securities will generally fluctuate with
changes in market interest rates. Unless Bonds are in default in payment of
principal or interest or in significant risk of such default, the Evaluator
will not attribute any value to the insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any.
The Evaluator will consider in its evaluation of Bonds which are in default in
payment of principal or interest or, in the Sponsor's opinion, in significant
risk of such default (the "Defaulted Bonds") the value of the
insurance guaranteeing interest and principal payments. The value of the
insurance will be equal to the difference between (i) the market value of
Defaulted Bonds assuming the exercise of the right to obtain Permanent
Insurance (less the insurance premiums and related expenses attributable to
the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value of such
Defaulted Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. In addition, the Evaluator
will consider the ability of the affected Portfolio Insurer to meet its
commitments under any Trust insurance policy, including the commitments to
issue Permanent Insurance. It is the position of the Sponsor that this is a
fair method of valuing the Bonds and the insurance obtained by an Insured
Trust and reflects a proper valuation method in accordance with the provisions
of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
No value has been ascribed to insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any,
as of the date of this Prospectus.
The initial or primary Public Offering Price of the Units is equal to the
offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust plus the
applicable sales charge plus Purchased Interest and interest accrued but
unpaid from the First Settlement Date to the date of settlement. The secondary
market Public Offering Price is equal to the bid price per Unit of the
Securities in each Trust plus the applicable sales charge plus Purchased
Interest and accrued interest. The offering price of Securities in each Trust
may be expected to average approximately 0.5%-1% more than the bid price of
such Securities. On the Date of Deposit, the offering side evaluations of the
Securities in the Trusts were higher than the bid side evaluations of such
Securities by the respective amounts indicated under footnote (5) in "
Notes to Portfolios".
Although payment is normally made five business days following the order for
purchase, payment may be made prior thereto. A person will become the owner of
Units on the date of settlement provided payment has been received. Cash, if
any, made available to the Sponsor prior to the date of settlement for the
purchase of Units may be used in the Sponsor's business and may be deemed to
be a benefit to the Sponsor, subject to the limitations of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Delivery of certificates representing Units so ordered
will be made five business days following such order or shortly thereafter.
See "Redemption of Units"below for information regarding the ability
to redeem Units ordered for purchase.
Market for Units. During the initial public offering period, the Sponsor
and/or certain of the Underwriters intend to offer to purchase Units at a
price equivalent to the Public Offering Price which is based upon the
aggregate offering price per Unit of the underlying Securities in each Trust
and the amount of Purchased Interest for each Trust plus accrued interest to
the date of settlement less the related sales commission. Afterward, although
they are not obligated to do so, the Sponsor intends to, and certain of the
other Underwriters may, maintain a market for the Units offered hereby and to
offer continuously to purchase such Units at prices, subject to change at any
time, based upon the aggregate bid prices of the Securities in the portfolio
of each Trust plus Purchased Interest plus interest accrued to the date of
settlement and plus any principal cash on hand, less any amounts representing
taxes or other governmental charges payable out of the Trust and less any
accrued Trust expenses. If the supply of Units exceeds demand or if some other
business reason warrants it, the Sponsor and/or the Underwriters may either
discontinue all purchases of Units or discontinue purchases of Units at such
prices. In the event that a market is not maintained for the Units and the
Unitholder cannot find another purchaser, a Unitholder of any Trust desiring
to dispose of his Units may be able to dispose of such Units only by tendering
them to the Trustee for redemption at the Redemption Price, which is based
upon the aggregate bid price of the Securities in the portfolio of such Trust
plus Purchased Interest and any accrued interest. The aggregate bid prices of
the underlying Securities in a Trust are expected to be less than the related
aggregate offering prices. See "Redemption of Units"below. A
Unitholder who wishes to dispose of his Units should inquire of his broker as
to current market prices in order to determine whether there is in existence
any price in excess of the Redemption Price and, if so, the amount thereof.
Distributions of Interest and Principal. Interest received by the Fund,
including that part of the proceeds of any disposition of Securities which
represents Purchased Interest and/or accrued interest, is credited by the
Trustee to the Interest Account for the appropriate Trust. Other receipts are
credited to the Principal Account for the appropriate Trust. Interest received
by the Fund after deduction of amounts sufficient to reimburse the Trustee,
without interest, for any amounts advanced and paid to the Sponsor as the
Unitholder of record as of the First Settlement Date (see "Public
Offering--Offering Price"above) will be distributed on or shortly after
the fifteenth day of each month on a pro rata basis to Unitholders of record
of a Trust as of the preceding record date who are entitled to distributions
at that time. All distributions will be net of applicable expenses. The pro
rata share of cash in the Principal Account of a Trust will be computed as of
the date set forth under "Per Unit Information"for the applicable
Trust, and thereafter as of the record date, and distributions to the
Unitholders as of such record date will be made on or shortly after the
fifteenth day of such month. Proceeds received from the disposition of any of
the Securities after such record date and prior to the following distribution
date will be held in the Principal Account and not distributed until the next
distribution date. The Trustee is not required to pay interest on funds held
in any Principal or Interest Account (but may itself earn interest thereon and
therefore benefits from the use of such funds) nor to make a distribution from
the Principal Account unless the amount available for distribution therein
shall equal at least $1.00 per Unit.
The distribution to the Unitholders of a Trust as of each record date after
the First Settlement Date will be made on the following distribution date or
shortly thereafter and shall consist of an amount substantially equal to such
portion of the Unitholder's pro rata share of the estimated net Annual
interest Income in the Interest Account of such Trust after deducting
estimated expenses. Because interest payments are not received by the Fund at
a constant rate throughout the year, such interest distribution may be more or
less than the amount credited to such Interest Account as of the record date.
For the purpose of minimizing fluctuations in the distributions from an
Interest Account, the Trustee is authorized to advance such amounts as may be
necessary to provide interest distributions of approximately equal amounts.
The Trustee shall be reimbursed, without interest, for any such advances from
funds in the applicable Interest Account on the ensuing record date. Persons
who purchase Units between a record date and a distribution date will receive
their first distribution on the second distribution date after the purchase.
As of the first day of each month, the Trustee will deduct from the Interest
Account and, to the extent funds are not sufficient therein, from the
Principal Account, amounts necessary to pay the expenses of the Fund (as
determined on the basis set forth under "Trust Administration--Fund
Administration and Expenses"). The Trustee also may withdraw from said
Accounts such amounts, if any, as it deems necessary to establish a reserve
for any governmental charges payable out of the Fund. Amounts so withdrawn
shall not be considered a part of the Fund's assets until such time as the
Trustee shall return all or any part of such amounts to the appropriate
Accounts. In addition, the Trustee may withdraw from the Interest and
Principal Accounts such amounts as may be necessary to cover purchases of
Replacement Bonds and redemptions of Units by the Trustee.
Reinvestment Option. Unitholders of all unit investment trusts sponsored by
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. (except Unitholders of a New York IM-IT Trust or a New
York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust), may elect to have each
distribution of interest income, capital gains and/or principal on their Units
automatically reinvested in shares of any of the open ended mutual funds
(except for B shares) listed under "Trust Administration--Sponsor"
which are registered in the Unitholder's state of residence. New York IM-IT
Trust and New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust Unitholders,
other than those residing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, may elect to
have each distribution of interest income, capital gains and/or principal on
their Units automatically reinvested in shares of First Investors New York
Insured Tax Free Fund, Inc., a fund which invests primarily in securities
exempt from federal and New York state and city income tax. Such mutual funds
are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Reinvestment Funds".
Each Reinvestment Fund has investment objectives which differ in certain
respects from those of the Trusts. The prospectus relating to each
Reinvestment Fund describes the investment policies of such fund and sets
forth the procedures to follow to commence reinvestment. A Unitholder may
obtain a prospectus for the respective Reinvestment Funds from Van Kampen
Merritt Inc. at One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181. Texas
residents who desire to reinvest may request that a broker-dealer registered
in Texas send the prospectus relating to the respective fund.
After becoming a participant in a reinvestment plan, each distribution of
interest income, capital gains and/or principal on the participant's Units
will, on the applicable distribution date, automatically be applied, as
directed by such person, as of such distribution date by the Trustee to
purchase shares (or fractions thereof) of the applicable Reinvestment Fund at
a net asset value as computed as of the close of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on such date, plus a sales charge of $1.00 per $100 of reinvestment
except if the participant selects the First Investors New York Insured Tax
Free Fund, Inc., in which case the sales charge will be $1.50 per $100 of
reinvestment, or except if the participant selects the Van Kampen Merritt
Money Market Fund or the Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free Money Fund in which case
no sales charge applies. A minimum of one-half of such sales charge would be
paid to Van Kampen Merritt Inc. for all Reinvestment Funds except First
Investors New York Insured Tax Free Fund, Inc., in which case such sales
charge would be paid to First Investors Management Company, Inc.
Confirmations of all reinvestments by a Unitholder into a Reinvestment Fund
will be mailed to the Unitholder by such Reinvestment Fund.
A participant may at any time prior to five days preceding the next succeeding
distribution date, by so notifying the Trustee in writing, elect to terminate
his or her reinvestment plan and receive future distributions of his or her
Units in cash. There will be no charge or other penalty for such termination.
Each Reinvestment Fund, its sponsor and investment adviser shall have the
right to terminate at any time the reinvestment plan relating to such fund.
Redemption of Units. A Unitholder may redeem all or a portion of his Units by
tender to the Trustee, at its Unit Investment Trust Division, 101 Barclay
Street, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10286, of the certificates representing
the Units to be redeemed, duly endorsed or accompanied by proper instruments
of transfer with signature guaranteed (or by providing satisfactory indemnity,
as in connection with lost, stolen or destroyed certificates) and by payment
of applicable governmental charges, if any. Thus, redemption of Units cannot
be effected until certificates representing such Units have been delivered to
the person seeking redemption or satisfactory indemnity provided. No
redemption fee will be charged. On the seventh calendar day following such
tender, or if the seventh calendar day is not a business day, on the first
business day prior thereto, the Unitholder will be entitled to receive in cash
an amount for each Unit equal to the Redemption Price per Unit next computed
after receipt by the Trustee of such tender of Units. The "date of
tender"is deemed to be the date on which Units are received by the
Trustee, except that as regards Units received after 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on
days of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, the date of tender is the next
day on which such Exchange is open for trading and such Units will be deemed
to have been tendered to the Trustee on such day for redemption at the
Redemption Price computed on that day.
Under regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service, the Trustee will be
required to withhold a specified percentage of the principal amount of a Unit
redemption if the Trustee has not been furnished the redeeming Unitholder's
tax identification number in the manner required by such regulations. Any
amount so withheld is transmitted to the Internal Revenue Service and may be
recovered by the Unitholder only when filing a return. Under normal
circumstances the Trustee obtains the Unitholder's tax identification number
from the selling broker. However, at any time a Unitholder elects to tender
Units for redemption, such Unitholder should provide a tax identification
number to the Trustee in order to avoid this possible "back-up
withholding"in the event the Trustee has not been previously provided
such number.
Purchased Interest and accrued interest paid on redemption shall be withdrawn
from the Interest Account of such Trust or, if the balance therein is
insufficient, from the Principal Account of such Trust. All other amounts will
be withdrawn from the Principal Account of such Trust. The Trustee is
empowered to sell underlying Securities of a Trust in order to make funds
available for redemption. Units so redeemed shall be cancelled.
The Redemption Price per Unit (as well as the secondary market Public Offering
Price) will be determined on the basis of the bid price of the Securities in
each Trust, while the initial and primary Public Offering Price of Units will
be determined on the basis of the offering price of the Securities in each
Trust, as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern time on days of trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on the date any such determination is made. On the Date of Deposit
the Public Offering Price per Unit (which is based on the offering prices of
the Bonds and Purchased Interest in each Trust and includes the sales charge)
exceeded the value at which Units could have been redeemed (based upon the
current bid prices of the Securities and Purchased Interest in such Trust) by
the amount shown under "Summary of Essential Financial Information".
While the Trustee has the power to determine the Redemption Price per Unit
when Units are tendered for redemption, such authority has been delegated to
the Evaluator which determines the price per Unit on a daily basis. The
Redemption Price per Unit is the pro rata share of each Unit in each Trust on
the basis of (i) the cash on hand in such Trust or moneys in the process of
being collected, (ii) the value of the Securities in such Trust based on the
bid prices of the Securities therein, except for cases in which the value of
insurance has been included, (iii) Purchased Interest for each Trust and (iv)
interest accrued thereon, less (a) amounts representing taxes or other
governmental charges payable out of such Trust and (b) the accrued expenses of
such Trust. The Evaluator may determine the value of the Securities in each
Trust by employing any of the methods set forth in "Public
Offering--Offering Price". In determining the Redemption Price per Unit no
value will be assigned to the portfolio insurance maintained on the Bonds in
an Insured Trust unless such Bonds are in default in payment of principal or
interest or in significant risk of such default. For a description of the
situations in which the Evaluator may value the insurance obtained by the
Insured Trusts, see "Public Offering--Offering Price"above.
The price at which Units may be redeemed could be less than the price paid by
the Unitholder and may be less than the par value of the Securities
represented by the Units so redeemed. As stated above, the Trustee may sell
Securities to cover redemptions. When Securities are sold, the size and
diversity of the affected Trust will be reduced. Such sales may be required at
a time when Securities would not otherwise be sold and might result in lower
prices than might otherwise be realized.
The right of redemption may be suspended and payment postponed for any period
during which the New York Stock Exchange is closed, other than for customary
weekend and holiday closings, or during which the Securities and Exchange
Commission determines that trading on that Exchange is restricted or an
emergency exists, as a result of which disposal or evaluation of the
Securities in the Trusts is not reasonably practicable, or for such other
periods as the Securities and Exchange Commission may by order permit. Under
certain extreme circumstances the Sponsor may apply to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for an order permitting a full or partial suspension of
the right of Unitholders to redeem their Units.
Reports Provided. The Trustee shall furnish Unitholders of a Trust in
connection with each distribution a statement of the amount of interest and
the amount of other receipts (received since the preceding distribution), if
any, being distributed expressed in each case as a dollar amount representing
the pro rata share of each Unit of a Trust outstanding. For as long as the
Trustee deems it to be in the best interests of the Unitholders, the accounts
of each Trust shall be audited, not less frequently than annually, by
independent certified public accountants and the report of such accountants
shall be furnished by the Trustee to Unitholders of such Trusts upon request.
Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year, the
Trustee shall furnish to each person who at any time during the calendar year
was a registered Unitholder of a Trust a statement (i) as to the Interest
Account: interest received (including amounts representing interest received
upon any disposition of Securities) and the percentage of such interest by
states in which the issuers of the Securities are located, the amount of
Purchased Interest, deductions for applicable taxes and for fees and expenses
of such Trust, for purchases of Replacement Bonds and for redemptions of
Units, if any, and the balance remaining after such distributions and
deductions, expressed in each case both as a total dollar amount and as a
dollar amount representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding on the
last business day of such calendar year; (ii) as to the Principal Account: the
dates of disposition of any Securities and the net proceeds received therefrom
(excluding any portion representing accrued interest), the amount paid for
purchases of Replacement Bonds and for redemptions of Units, if any,
deductions for payment of applicable taxes and fees and expenses of the
Trustee, the amount of "when issued"interest treated as a return of
capital, if any, and the balance remaining after such distributions and
deductions expressed both as a total dollar amount and as a dollar amount
representing the pro rata share of each Unit outstanding on the last business
day of such calendar year; (iii) a list of the Securities held and the number
of Units outstanding on the last business day of such calendar year; (iv) the
Redemption Price per Unit based upon the last computation thereof made during
such calendar year; and (v) amounts actually distributed during such calendar
year from the Interest and Principal Accounts, separately stated, expressed
both as total dollar amounts and as dollar amounts representing the pro rata
share of each Unit outstanding.
In order to comply with Federal and state tax reporting requirements,
Unitholders will be furnished, upon request to the Trustee, evaluations of the
Securities in a Trust furnished to it by the Evaluator.
INSURANCE ON THE BONDS IN THE INSURED TRUSTS
Insurance has been obtained by each Insured Trust or by the issuer of such
Bonds, or by a prior owner of such Bonds, or by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds in a Trust guaranteeing prompt payment of interest and
principal, when due, in respect of the Bonds in such Trust. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and
Securities Selection". An insurance policy obtained by an Insured Trust,
if any, is non-cancellable and will continue in force so long as such Trust is
in existence, the respective Portfolio Insurer referred to below is still in
business and the Bonds described in such policy continue to be held by such
Trust (see "Portfolio"for the respective Insured Trust). Any
portfolio insurance premium for an Insured Trust, which is an obligation of
such Trust, is paid by each Trust on a monthly basis. Non-payment of premiums
on a policy obtained by an Insured Trust will not result in the cancellation
of insurance but will force the insurer to take action against the Trustee to
recover premium payments due it. The Trustee in turn will be entitled to
recover such payments from such Trust. Premium rates for each issue of Bonds
protected by a policy obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, are fixed for the
life of the Trust. The premium for any Preinsured Bond insurance has been paid
by such issuer, by a prior owner of such Bonds or the Sponsor and any such
policy or policies are non-cancellable and will continue in force so long as
the Bonds so insured are outstanding and the respective Preinsured Bond
Insurer remains in business. If the provider of an original issuance insurance
policy is unable to meet its obligations under such policy or if the rating
assigned to the claims-paying ability of any such insurer deteriorates, the
Portfolio Insurers have no obligation to insure any issue adversely affected
by either of the above described events.
The aforementioned portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any,
guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on the Bonds as they
fall due. For the purposes of insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, "
when due"generally means the stated maturity date for the payment of
principal and interest. However, in the event (a) an issuer of a Bond defaults
in the payment of principal or interest on such Bond, (b) such issuer enters
into a bankruptcy proceeding or (c) the maturity of such Bond is accelerated,
the affected Portfolio Insurer has the option, in its sole discretion, after
receiving notice of the earliest to occur of such a default, bankruptcy
proceeding or acceleration to pay the outstanding principal amount of such
Bond plus accrued interest to the date of such payment and thereby retire the
Bond from the affected Trust prior to such Bond's stated maturity date. The
insurance does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the
Units. Insurance obtained by an Insured Trust, if any, is only effective as to
Bonds owned by and held in such Trust. In the event of a sale of any such Bond
by the Trustee, such insurance terminates as to such Bond on the date of sale.
Pursuant to an irrevocable commitment of the Portfolio Insurers, the Trustee,
upon the sale of a Bond covered under a portfolio insurance policy obtained by
an Insured Trust, has the right to obtain permanent insurance with respect to
such Bond (i.e., insurance to maturity of the Bonds regardless of the identity
of the holder thereof) (the "Permanent Insurance") upon the payment of
a single predetermined insurance premium and any expenses related thereto from
the proceeds of the sale of such Bond. Accordingly, any Bond in an Insured
Trust is eligible to be sold on an insured basis. It is expected that the
Trustee would exercise the right to obtain Permanent Insurance only if upon
such exercise the affected Trust would receive net proceeds (sale of Bond
proceeds less the insurance premium and related expenses attributable to the
Permanent Insurance) from such sale in excess of the sale proceeds if such
Bonds were sold on an uninsured basis. The insurance premium with respect to
each Bond eligible for Permanent Insurance would be determined based upon the
insurability of each Bond as of the Date of Deposit and would not be increased
or decreased for any change in the creditworthiness of each Bond.
The Sponsor believes that the Permanent Insurance option provides an advantage
to an Insured Trust in that each Bond insured by a Trust insurance policy may
be sold out of the affected Trust with the benefits of the insurance attaching
thereto. Thus, the value of the insurance, if any, at the time of sale, can be
realized in the market value of the Bond so sold (which is not the case in
connection with any value attributable to an Insured Trust's portfolio
insurance). See "Public Offering--Offering Price". Because any such
insurance value may be realized in the market value of the Bond upon the sale
thereof upon exercise of the Permanent Insurance option, the Sponsor
anticipates that (a) in the event an Insured Trust were to be comprised of a
substantial percentage of Bonds in default or significant risk of default, it
is much less likely that such Trust would need at some point in time to seek a
suspension of redemptions of Units than if such Trust were to have no such
option (see "Public Offering--Redemption of Units") and (b) at the
time of termination of an Insured Trust, if such Trust were holding defaulted
Bonds or Bonds in significant risk of default such Trust would not need to
hold such Bonds until their respective maturities in order to realize the
benefits of such Trust's portfolio insurance (see "Trust
Administration--Amendment or Termination").
Except as indicated below, insurance obtained by an Insured Trust has no
effect on the price or redemption value of Units. It is the present intention
of the Evaluator to attribute a value for such insurance (including the right
to obtain Permanent Insurance) for the purpose of computing the price or
redemption value of Units if the Bonds covered by such insurance are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default. The value of the insurance will be the difference between (i) the
market value of a Bond which is in default in payment of principal or interest
or in significant risk of such default assuming the exercise of the right to
obtain Permanent Insurance (less the insurance premium and related expenses
attributable to the purchase of Permanent Insurance) and (ii) the market value
of such Bonds not covered by Permanent Insurance. See "Public
Offering--Offering Price". It is also the present intention of the Trustee
not to sell such Bonds to effect redemptions or for any other reason but
rather to retain them in the portfolio because value attributable to the
insurance cannot be realized upon sale. See "Public Offering--Offering
Price"herein for a more complete description of an Insured Trust's method
of valuing defaulted Bonds and Bonds which have a significant risk of default.
Insurance obtained by the issuer of a Bond is effective so long as such Bond
is outstanding. Therefore, any such insurance may be considered to represent
an element of market value in regard to the Bonds thus insured, but the exact
effect, if any, of this insurance on such market value cannot be predicted.
The portfolio insurance policy or policies obtained by an Insured Trust, if
any, with respect to the Bonds in such Trust were issued by one or more of the
Portfolio Insurers. Any other Preinsured Bond insurance policy (or commitment
therefor) was issued by one of the Preinsured Bond Insurers. See "
Unitholder Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts--Objectives and
Securities Selection".
AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC Indemnity") is a
Wisconsin-domiciled stock insurance corporation regulated by the Office of the
Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Wisconsin and licensed to do
business in 50 states, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, with admitted assets of approximately $1,988,000,000 (unaudited) and
statutory capital of approximately $1,148,000,000 (unaudited) as of March 31,
1994. Statutory capital consists of AMBAC Indemnity's policyholders' surplus
and statutory contingency reserve. AMBAC Indemnity is a wholly owned
subsidiary of AMBAC Inc., a 100% publicly-held company. Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Corporation have both assigned a triple-A
claims-paying ability rating to AMBAC Indemnity.
Copies of its financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting standards are available from AMBAC Indemnity. The address of AMBAC
Indemnity's administrative offices and its telephone number are One State
Street Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, 10004 and (212) 668-0340.
AMBAC Indemnity has entered into quota share reinsurance agreements under
which a percentage of the insurance underwritten pursuant to certain municipal
bond insurance programs of AMBAC Indemnity has been and will be assumed by a
number of foreign and domestic unaffiliated reinsurers.
Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation ("MBIA") is the
principal operating subsidiary of MBIA Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed
company. MBIA Inc. is not obligated to pay the debts of or claims against
MBIA. MBIA is a limited liability corporation rather than a several liability
association. MBIA is domiciled in the State of New York and licensed to do
business in all fifty states, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico. As of June 30, 1994 MBIA had admitted assets of $3.3 billion
(unaudited), total liabilities of $2.2 billion (unaudited), and total capital
and surplus of $1.1 billion (unaudited) determined in accordance with
statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory
authorities. Copies of MBIA's year end financial statements prepared in
accordance with statutory accounting practices are available from MBIA. The
address of MBIA is 113 King Street, Armonk, New York 10504.
Effective December 31, 1989, MBIA Inc. acquired Bond Investors Group, Inc. On
January 5, 1990, MBIA acquired all of the outstanding stock of Bond Investors
Group, Inc., the parent of Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance Company (BIG),
now known as MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois. Through a reinsurance
agreement, BIG has ceded all of its net insured risks, as well as its unearned
premium and contingency reserves, to MBIA and MBIA has reinsured BIG's net
outstanding exposure.
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rates all bond issues insured by MBIA "
Aaa"and short term loans "MIG 1,"both designated to be of the
highest quality.
Standard & Poor's Corporation rates all new issues insured by MBIA "
AAA"Prime Grade.
The Moody's Investors Service, Inc. rating of MBIA should be evaluated
independently of the Standard & Poor's Corporation rating of MBIA. No
application has been made to any other rating agency in order to obtain
additional ratings on the Bonds. The ratings reflect the respective rating
agency's current assessment of the creditworthiness of MBIA and its ability to
pay claims on its policies of insurance. Any further explanation as to the
significance of the above ratings may be obtained only from the applicable
rating agency.
The above ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Bonds, and
such ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the
rating agencies. Any downward revision or withdrawal of either or both ratings
may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds.
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company ("Financial Guaranty"or "
FGIC") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of FGIC Corporation (the "
Corporation"), a Delaware holding company. The Corporation is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC"
). Neither the Corporation nor GECC is obligated to pay the debts of or the
claims against Financial Guaranty. Financial Guaranty is domiciled in the
State of New York and is subject to regulation by the State of New York
Insurance Department. As of June 30, 1994, the total capital and surplus of
Financial Guaranty was approximately $850,000,000. Copies of Financial
Guaranty's financial statements, prepared on the basis of statutory accounting
principles, and the Corporation's financial statements, prepared on the basis
of generally accepted accounting principles, may be obtained by writing to
Financial Guaranty at 115 Broadway, New York, New York 10006, Attention:
Communications Department, telephone number: (212) 312-3000 or to the New York
State Insurance Department at 160 West Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, New
York 10013, Attention: Property Companies Bureau, telephone number: (212)
621-0389.
In addition, Financial Guaranty Insurance Company is currently licensed to
write insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. ("Financial Security"or "
FSA") is a monoline insurance company incorporated on March 16, 1984 under
the laws of the State of New York. The operations of Financial Security
commenced on July 25, 1985, and Financial Security received its New York State
insurance license on September 23, 1985. Financial Security and its two wholly
owned subsidiaries are licensed to engage in the financial guaranty insurance
business in 49 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
Financial Security and its subsidiaries are engaged exclusively in the
business of writing financial guaranty insurance, principally in respect of
asset-backed and other collateralized securities offered in domestic and
foreign markets. Financial Security and its subsidiaries also write financial
guaranty insurance in respect of municipal and other obligations and reinsure
financial guaranty insurance policies written by other leading insurance
companies. In general, financial guaranty insurance consists of the issuance
of a guaranty of scheduled payments of an issuer's securities, thereby
enhancing the credit rating of those securities, in consideration for payment
of a premium to the insurer.
Financial Security is approximately 91.6% owned by U S WEST, Inc. and 8.4%
owned by The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. ("Tokio Marine"
). Neither U S WEST, Inc. nor Tokio Marine is obligated to pay the debts of or
the claims against Financial Security. Financial Security is domiciled in the
State of New York and is subject to regulation by the State of New York
Insurance Department. As of March 31, 1993, the total policyholders' surplus
and contingency reserves and the total unearned premium reserve, respectively,
of Financial Security and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, approximately $479,110,000
(unaudited) and $220,078,000 (unaudited), and the total shareholders' equity
and the total unearned premium reserve, respectively, of Financial Security
and its consolidated subsidiaries were, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, approximately $628,119,000 (unaudited) and $202,493,000
(unaudited). Copies of Financial Security's financial statements may be
obtained by writing to Financial Security at 350 Park Avenue, New York, New
York, 10022, Attention: Communications Department. Its telephone number is
(212) 826-0100.
Pursuant to an intercompany agreement, liabilities on financial guaranty
insurance written by Financial Security or either of its subsidiaries are
reinsured among such companies on an agreed-upon percentage substantially
proportional to their respective capital, surplus and reserves, subject to
applicable statutory risk limitations. In addition, Financial Security
reinsures a portion of its liabilities under certain of its financial guaranty
insurance policies with unaffiliated reinsurers under various quota share
treaties and on a transaction-by-transaction basis. Such reinsurance is
utilized by Financial Security as a risk management device and to comply with
certain statutory and rating agency requirements; it does not alter or limit
Financial Security's obligations under any financial guaranty insurance
policy.
Financial Security's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa"by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc., and "AAA"by Standard & Poor's Corporation,
Nippon Investors Service Inc., Duff & Phelps Inc. and Australian Ratings Pty.
Ltd. Such ratings reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies,
are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are subject to
revision or withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
Capital Guaranty Insurance Company ("Capital Guaranty") is a "
Aaa/AAA"rated monoline stock insurance company incorporated in the State
of Maryland, and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Capital Guaranty Corporation,
a Maryland insurance holding company. Capital Guaranty Corporation is a
publicly owned company whose shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Capital Guaranty is authorized to provide insurance in 49 states, the District
of Columbia and three U.S. territories. Capital Guaranty focuses on insuring
municipal securities and our policies guaranty the timely payment of principal
and interest when due for payment on new issue and secondary market issue
municipal bond transactions. Capital Guaranty's claims-paying ability is
rated "Triple-A"by both Moody's and Standard & Poor's.
As of June 30, 1994, Capital Guaranty had more than $13.7 billion in net
exposure outstanding (excluding deferred issues). The total statutory
policyholders' surplus and contingency reserve of Capital Guaranty was
$89,917,075 (unaudited), and the total admitted assets were $286,825,253
(unaudited) as reported to the Insurance Department of the State of Maryland
as of June 30, 1994. Financial statements for Capital Guaranty Insurance
Company, that have been prepared in accordance with statutory insurance
accounting standards, are available upon request. The address of Capital
Guaranty's headquarters and its telephone number are Steuart Tower, 22nd
Floor, One Market Plaza, San Francisco, CA 94105-1413 and (415) 995-8000.
CapMAC is a New York-domiciled monoline stock insurance company which engages
only in the business of financial guarantee and surety insurance. CapMAC is
licensed in 50 states in addition to the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the territory of Guam. CapMAC insures
structured asset-backed, corporate, municipal and other financial obligations
in the domestic and foreign capital markets. CapMAC may also provide financial
guarantee reinsurance for structured asset-backed, corporate and municipal
obligations written by other major insurance companies.
CapMAC's claims-paying ability is rated "Aaa"by Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. ("Moody's"), "AAA"by Standard & Poor's
Corporation ("Standard & Poor's"), "AAA"by Duff & Phelps,
Inc. ("Duff & Phelps") and "AAA"by Nippon Investors Inc. Such
ratings reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies, are not
recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and are subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by such rating agencies.
CapMAC is wholly owned by CapMAC Holdings Inc. ("Holdings"), a company
that is owned by a group of institutional and other investors, including
CapMAC's management and employees.
Neither Holdings nor any of its stockholders is obligated to pay any claims
under any surety bond issued by CapMAC or any debts of CapMAC or to make
additional capital contributions.
CapMAC is regulated by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New
York. In addition, CapMAC is subject to regulation by the insurance
departments of the other jurisdictions in which it is licensed. CapMAC is
subject to periodic regulatory examinations by the same regulatory
authorities.
CapMAC is bound by insurance laws and regulations regarding capital transfers,
limitations upon dividends, investment of assets, changes in control,
transactions with affiliates and consolidations and acquisitions. The amount
of exposure per risk that CapMAC may retain, after giving effect to
reinsurance, collateral or other security, is also regulated. Statutory and
regulatory accounting practices may prescribe appropriate rates at which
premiums are earned and the levels of reserves required. In addition, various
insurance laws restrict the incurrence of debt, regulate permissible
investments of reserves, capital and surplus, and govern the form of surety
bonds.
CapMAC's obligations under the Surety Bond(s) may be reinsured. Such
reinsurance does not relieve CapMAC of any of its obligations under the Surety
Bond(s).
THE SURETY BOND IS NOT COVERED BY THE PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE SECURITY
FUND SPECIFIED IN ARTICLE 76 OF THE NEW YORK INSURANCE LAW.
As of December 31, 1993 and 1992, CapMAC had qualified statutory capital
(which consists of policyholders' surplus and contingency reserve) of
approximately $168 million and $163 million, respectively, and had not
incurred any debt obligations. Article 69 of the New York State Insurance Law
requires CapMAC to establish and maintain the contingency reserve, which is
available to cover claims under surety bonds issued by CapMAC.
In addition to its qualified statutory capital and other reinsurance available
to pay claims under its surety bonds, CapMAC has entered into a Stop Loss
Reinsurance Agreement (the "Stop Loss Agreement") with Winterthur
Swiss Insurance Company (the "Reinsurer"), which is rated AAA by
Standard & Poor's and Aaa by Moody's, pursuant to which the Reinsurer will
be required to pay any losses incurred by CapMAC during the term of the Stop
Loss Agreement on the surety bonds covered under the Stop Loss Agreement in
excess of a specified amount of losses incurred by CapMAC under such surety
bonds (such specified amount initially being $100 million and increasing
annually by an amount equal to 66 2/3% of the increase in CapMAC's statutory
capital and surplus) up to an aggregate limit payable under the Stop Loss
Agreement of $50 million. The Stop Loss Agreement has a term of seven years,
is extendable for one-year periods and is subject to early termination upon
the occurrence of certain events.
CapMAC also has available a $100,000,000 standby corporate liquidity facility
(the "Liquidity Facility") provided by a syndicate of banks rated
A1+/P1 by Standard & Poor's and Moody's, respectively, having a term of 360
days. Under the Liquidity Facility CapMAC will be able, subject to satisfying
certain conditions, to borrow funds from time to time in order to enable it to
fund any claim payments or payments made in settlement or mitigation of claims
payments under its surety bonds, including the Surety Bond.
Copies of CapMAC's financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting standards, which differ from generally accepted accounting
principles, and filed with the Insurance Department of the State of New York
are available upon request. CapMAC is located at 885 Third Avenue, New York,
New York 10022, and its telephone number is (212) 755-1155.
In order to be in an Insured Trust, Bonds must be insured by one of the
Preinsured Bond Insurers or be eligible for the insurance being obtained by
such Trust. In determining eligibility for insurance, the Preinsured Bond
Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and Financial Guaranty have applied their own
standards which correspond generally to the standards they normally use in
establishing the insurability of new issues of municipal bonds and which are
not necessarily the criteria used in the selection of Bonds by the Sponsor. To
the extent the standards of the Preinsured Bond Insurers, AMBAC Indemnity and
Financial Guaranty are more restrictive than those of the Sponsor, the
previously stated Trust investment criteria have been limited with respect to
the Bonds. This decision is made prior to the Date of Deposit, as debt
obligations not eligible for insurance are not deposited in an Insured Trust.
Thus, all of the Bonds in the portfolios of the Insured Trusts in the Fund are
insured either by the respective Trust or by the issuer of the Bonds, by a
prior owner of such Bonds or by the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Bonds
in a Trust.
Because the Bonds are insured by one of the Portfolio Insurers or one of the
Preinsured Bond Insurers as to the timely payment of principal and interest,
when due, and on the basis of the various reinsurance agreements in effect,
Standard & Poor's Corporation has assigned to the Units of each Insured Trust
its "AAA"investment rating. See "Description of Securities
Ratings". The obtaining of this rating by an Insured Trust should not be
construed as an approval of the offering of the Units by Standard & Poor's
Corporation or as a guarantee of the market value of such Trust or of the
Units.
An objective of portfolio insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is to obtain
a higher yield on the portfolio of such Trust than would be available if all
the Securities in such portfolio had Standard & Poor's Corporation "
AAA"rating and yet at the same time to have the protection of insurance
of prompt payment of interest and principal, when due, on the Bonds. There is,
of course, no certainty that this result will be achieved. Preinsured Bonds in
an Insured Trust (all of which are rated "AAA"by Standard & Poor's
Corporation) may or may not have a higher yield than uninsured bonds rated
"AAA"by Standard & Poor's Corporation. In selecting such Bonds for an
Insured Trust, the Sponsor has applied the criteria hereinbefore described.
In the event of nonpayment of interest or principal, when due, in respect of a
Bond, AMBAC Indemnity shall make such payment not later than 30 days and
Financial Guaranty shall make such payment within one business day after the
respective insurer has been notified that such nonpayment has occurred or is
threatened (but not earlier than the date such payment is due). The insurer,
as regards any payment it may make, will succeed to the rights of the Trustee
in respect thereof. All policies issued by the Portfolio Insurers and the
Preinsured Bond Insurers are substantially identical insofar as obligations to
an Insured Trust are concerned.
The Internal Revenue Service has issued a letter ruling which holds in effect
that insurance proceeds representing maturing interest on defaulted municipal
obligations paid to holders of insured bonds, under policy provisions
substantially identical to the policies described herein, will be excludable
from Federal gross income under Section 103(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code
to the same extent as if such payments were made by the issuer of the
municipal obligations. Holders of Units in an Insured Trust should discuss
with their tax advisers the degree of reliance which they may place on this
letter ruling. However, Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, has given
an opinion to the effect such payment of proceeds would be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations. See
"Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
Each Portfolio Insurer is subject to regulation by the department of insurance
in the state in which it is qualified to do business. Such regulation,
however, is no guarantee that each Portfolio Insurer will be able to perform
on its contract of insurance in the event a claim should be made thereunder at
some time in the future. At the date hereof, it is reported that no claims
have been submitted or are expected to be submitted to any of the Portfolio
Insurers which would materially impair the ability of any such company to meet
its commitment pursuant to any contract of bond or portfolio insurance.
The information relating to each Portfolio Insurer has been furnished by such
companies. The financial information with respect to each Portfolio Insurer
appears in reports filed with state insurance regulatory authorities and is
subject to audit and review by such authorities. No representation is made
herein as to the accuracy or adequacy of such information or as to the absence
of material adverse changes in such information subsequent to the dates
thereof.
The Bonds in the Insured Trusts are insured as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Bonds insured Bonds insured
under AMBAC under Financial
Trust Indemnity Guaranty Preinsured Total
portfolio insurance portfolio insurance Bonds
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California IM-IT................................ -- -- 100% 100%
Florida IM-IT................................... -- -- 100% 100%
Minnesota IM-IT................................. -- -- 100% 100%
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity... -- -- 100% 100%
New York IM-IT.................................. -- -- 100% 100%
Pennsylvania IM-IT.............................. -- -- 100% 100%
</TABLE>
The breakdown of the Preinsured Bonds is as follows: California IM-IT
Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 28% and MBIA 72%; Florida IM-IT Trust--Financial
Guaranty 40% and MBIA 60%; Minnesota IM-IT Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 24%, Capital
Guaranty 35%, Financial Guaranty 19% and MBIA 22%; New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 10%, Financial Guaranty 42% and MBIA
48%; New York IM-IT Trust--AMBAC Indemnity 35%, Financial Guaranty 3%, MBIA
46% and FSA 16%; Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust--Capital Guaranty 3%, Financial
Guaranty 33% and MBIA 64%.
CALIFORNIA IM-IT TRUST
General. The California IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities. Two of
the Bonds in the California IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total California IM-IT Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 2 (33%); Higher
Education, 1 (17%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (16%); Single Family Mortgage
Revenue, 1 (16%); Certificates of Participation, 1 (12%); Health Care, 1 (3%)
and Public Building, 1 (3%). No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. The Trust will invest substantially all of its assets in
California Municipal Obligations. The Trust is therefore susceptible to
political, economic or regulatory factors affecting issuers of California
Municipal Obligations. These include the possible adverse effects of certain
California constitutional amendments, legislative measures, voter initiatives
and other matters that are described below. The following information provides
only a brief summary of the complex factors affecting the financial situation
in California (the "State") and is derived from sources that are
generally available to investors and are believed to be accurate. No
independent verification has been made of the accuracy or completeness of any
of the following information. It is based in part on information obtained from
various State and local agencies in California or contained in official
statements for various California Municipal Obligations.
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local governmental finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of California Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Fund or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
California's economy is the largest among the 50 states and one of the largest
in the world. The State's population of over 30 million represents 12% of the
total United States population and grew by 27% in the 1980s. Total personal
income in the State, at an estimated $662 billion in 1991, accounts for 13% of
all personal income in the nation. Total employment is almost 14 million, the
majority of which is in the service, trade and manufacturing sectors.
Reports issued by the State Department of Finance and other sources indicate
that the State's economy is suffering its worst recession since the 1930s,
with prospects for recovery slower than for the nation as a whole. The State
has lost over 800,000 jobs since the start of the recession in mid 1990 and
additional job losses are expected before an upturn begins. The largest job
losses have been in Southern California, led by declines in the aerospace and
construction industries. Weaknesses statewide occurred in manufacturing,
construction, services and trade and will be hurt in the next few years by
continued cuts in federal defense spending and base closures. Unemployment is
expected to remain well above the national average in 1994. The State's
economy is only expected to pull out of the recession slowly, following the
national recovery which has begun. Delay in recovery will exacerbate
shortfalls in State revenues.
Certain California Municipal Obligations may be obligations of issuers which
rely in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, on ad valorem property taxes
as a source of revenue. The taxing powers of California local governments and
districts are limited by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, enacted
by the voters in 1978 and commonly known as "Proposition 13."Briefly,
Article XIIIA limits to 1% of full cash value the rate of ad valorem property
taxes on real property and generally restricts the reassessment of property to
2% per year, except upon new construction or change of ownership (subject to a
number of exemptions). Taxing entities may, however, raise ad valorem taxes
above the 1% limit to pay debt service on voter-approved bonded indebtedness.
Under Article XIIIA, the basic 1% ad valorem tax levy is applied against the
assessed value of property as of the owner's date of acquisition (or as of
March 1, 1975, if acquired earlier), subject to certain adjustments. This
system has resulted in widely varying amounts of tax on similarly situated
properties. Several lawsuits have been filed challenging the acquisition-based
assessment system of Proposition 13, and on June 18, 1992 the U.S. Supreme
Court announced a decision upholding Proposition 13.
Article XIIIA prohibits local governments from raising revenues through ad
valorem property taxes above the 1% limit; it also requires voters of any
governmental unit to give two-thirds approval to levy any "special
tax."Court decisions, however, allowed non-voter approved levy of "
general taxes"which were not dedicated to a specific use. In response to
these decisions, the voters of the State in 1986 adopted an initiative statute
which imposed significant new limits on the ability of local entities to raise
or levy general taxes, except by receiving majority local voter approval.
Significant elements of this initiative, "Proposition 62", have been
overturned in recent court cases. An initiative proposed to re-enact the
provisions of Proposition 62 as a constitutional amendment was defeated by the
voters in November 1990, but such a proposal may be renewed in the future.
California and its local governments are subject to an annual "
appropriations limit"imposed by Article XIIIB of the California
Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1979 and significantly amended by
Propositions 98 and 111 in 1988 and 1990, respectively. Article XIIIB
prohibits the State or any covered local government from spending "
appropriations subject to limitation"in excess of the appropriations
limit imposed. "Appropriations subject to limitation"are
authorizations to spend "proceeds of taxes,"which consists of tax
revenues and certain other funds, including proceeds from regulatory licenses,
user charges or other fees, to the extent that such proceeds exceed the cost
of providing the product or service, but "proceeds of taxes"excludes
most State subventions to local governments. No limit is imposed on
appropriations of funds which are not "proceeds of taxes,"such as
reasonable user charges or fees and certain other non-tax funds, including
bond proceeds.
Among the expenditures not included in the Article XIIIB appropriations limit
are (1) the debt service cost of bonds issued or authorized prior to January
1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, (2) appropriations arising
from certain emergencies declared by the Governor, (3) appropriations for
certain capital outlay projects, (4) appropriations by the State of post-1989
increases in gasoline taxes and vehicle weight fees, and (5) appropriations
made in certain cases of emergency.
The appropriations limit for each year is adjusted annually to reflect changes
in cost of living and population, and any transfers of service
responsibilities between government units. The definitions for such
adjustments were liberalized in 1990 by Proposition 111 to follow more closely
growth in California's economy.
"Excess"revenues are measured over a two-year cycle. Local
governments must return any excess to taxpayers by rate reduction. The State
must refund 50% of any excess, with the other 50% paid to schools and
community colleges. With more liberal annual adjustment factors since 1988,
and depressed revenues since 1990 because of the recession, few governments
are currently operating near their spending limits, but this condition may
change over time. Local governments may by voter approval exceed their
spending limits for up to four years.
During fiscal year 1986-87, State receipts from proceeds of taxes exceeded its
appropriations limit by $1.1 billion, which was returned to taxpayers. Since
that year, appropriations subject to limitation have been under the State
limit. State appropriations are expected to be $3.7 billion under the limit
for Fiscal Year 1993-94.
Because of the complex nature of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB of the California
Constitution, the ambiguities and possible inconsistencies in their terms, and
the impossibility of predicting future appropriations or changes in population
and cost of living, and the probability of continuing legal challenges, it is
not currently possible to determine fully the impact of Article XIIIA or
Article XIIIB on California Municipal Obligations or on the ability of
California or local governments to pay debt service on such California
Municipal Obligations. It is not presently possible to predict the outcome of
any pending litigation with respect to the ultimate scope, impact or
constitutionality of either Article XIIIA or Article XIIIB, or the impact of
any such determinations upon State agencies or local governments, or upon
their ability to pay debt service on their obligations. Future initiative or
legislative changes in laws or the California Constitution may also affect the
ability of the State or local issuers to repay their obligations.
As of April 1, 1994, California had approximately $18.1 billion of general
obligation bonds outstanding, and $5.6 billion remained authorized but
unissued. In addition, at June 30, 1993, the State had lease-purchase
obligations, payable from the State's General Fund, of approximately $4.0
billion. Of the State's outstanding general obligation debt, approximately 28%
is presently self-liquidating (for which program revenues are anticipated to
be sufficient to reimburse the General Fund for debt service payments). Four
general obligation bond propositions, totalling $5.9 billion, will be on the
June, 1994 ballot. In Fiscal Year 1992-93, debt service on general obligation
bonds and lease-purchase debt was approximately 4.1% of General Fund revenues.
The State has paid the principal of and interest on its general obligation
bonds, lease-purchase debt and short-term obligations when due.
The principal sources of General Fund revenues in 1992-93 were the California
personal income tax (44% of total revenues), the sales tax (38%), bank and
corporation taxes (12%), and the gross premium tax on insurance (3%).
California maintains a Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties (the "
Economic Uncertainties Fund"), derived from General Fund revenues, as a
reserve to meet cash needs of the General Fund, but which is required to be
replenished as soon as sufficient revenues are available. Year-end balances in
the Economic Uncertainties Fund are included for financial reporting purposes
in the General Fund balance. In most recent years, California has budgeted to
maintain the Economic Uncertainties Fund at around 3% of General Fund
expenditures but essentially no reserve has been budgeted in 1992-93 or
1993-1994 because reserves have been reduced by the recession.
Throughout the 1980s, State spending increased rapidly as the State population
and economy also grew rapidly, including increased spending for many
assistance programs to local governments, which were constrained by
Proposition 13 and other laws. The largest State program is assistance to
local public school districts. In 1988, an initiative (Proposition 98) was
enacted which (subject to suspension by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature
and the Governor) guarantees local school districts and community college
districts a minimum share of State General Fund revenues (currently about
34%).
Since the start of 1990-91 Fiscal Year, the State has faced adverse economic,
fiscal and budget conditions. The economic recession seriously affected State
tax revenues. It also caused increased expenditures for health and welfare
programs. The State is also facing a structural imbalance in its budget with
the largest programs supported by the General Fund (education, health, welfare
and corrections) growing at rates significantly higher than the growth rates
for the principal revenue sources of the General Fund. As a result, the State
entered a period of budget imbalance, with expenditures exceeding revenues for
four of the last five fiscal years through 1991-92.
As the State fell into a deep recession in the summer of 1990, the State
budget fell sharply out of balance in the 1990-91 and 1991-92 fiscal years,
despite significant expenditure cuts and tax increases. The State had
accumulated a $2.8 billion budget deficit by June 30, 1992. This deficit also
severely reduced the State's cash resources, so that it had to rely on
external borrowing in the short-term markets to meet its cash needs.
With the failure to enact a budget by July 1, 1992, the State had no legal
authority to pay many of its vendors until the budget was passed;
nevertheless, certain obligations (such as debt service, school
apportionments, welfare payments and employee salaries) were payable because
of continuing or special appropriations or court orders. However, the State
Controller did not have enough cash to pay all of these ongoing obligations as
they came due, as well as valid obligations incurred in the prior fiscal year.
Starting on July 1, 1992, the Controller was required to issue "registered
warrants"in lieu of normal warrants backed by cash to pay many State
obligations. Available cash was used to pay constitutionally mandated and
priority obligations. Between July 1 and September 3, 1992, the Controller
issued an aggregate of approximately $3.8 billion of registered warrants, all
of which were called for redemption by September 4, 1992 following enactment
of the 1992-93 Budget Act and issuance by the State of $3.3 billion of Interim
Notes.
The 1992-93 Budget Act, when finally adopted, was projected to eliminate the
State's accumulated deficit, with additional expenditure cuts and a $1.3
billion transfer of State education funding costs to local governments by
shifting local property taxes to school districts. However, as the recession
continued longer and deeper than expected, revenues once again were far below
projections, and only reached a level just equal to the amount of
expenditures. Thus, the State continued to carry its $2.8 billion budget
deficit at June 30, 1993.
The 1993-94 Budget Act was similar to the prior year, in reliance on
expenditure cuts and an additional $2.6 billion transfer of costs to local
government, particularly counties. A major feature of the budget was a
two-year plan to eliminate the accumulated deficit by borrowing into the
1994-95 fiscal year. With the recession still continuing longer than expected,
the 1994-95 Governor's Budget now projects that in the 1993-94 Fiscal Year,
the General Fund will have $900 million less revenue and $800 million higher
expenditures than budgeted. As a result revenues will only exceed expenditures
by about $400 million. If this projection is met, it will be the first
operating surplus in four years; however, some budget analysts outside the
Department of Finance project revenues in the balance of 1993-94 will not even
meet the revised, lower projection. In addition, the General Fund may have
some unplanned costs for relief related to the January, 17, 1994 Northridge
earthquake.
The State has implemented its short-term borrowing as part of the deficit
elimination plan, and has also borrowed additional sums to cover cash flow
shortfalls in the spring of 1994, for a total of $3.2 billion, coming due in
July and December, 1994. Repayment of these short-term notes will require
additional borrowing, as the State's cash position continues to be adversely
affected.
The Governor's 1994-95 Budget proposal recognizes the need to bridge a gap of
around $5 billion by June 30, 1995. Over $3.1 billion of this amount is being
requested from the federal government as increased aid, particularly for costs
associated with incarcerating, educating and providing health and welfare
services to undocumented immigrants. However, President Clinton has not
included these costs in his proposed Fiscal 1995 Budget. The rest of the
budget gap is proposed to be closed with expenditure cuts and projected $600
million of new revenue assuming the State wins a tax case presently pending in
the U.S. Supreme Court. Thus the State will once again face significant
uncertainties and very difficult choices in the 1994-95 budget, as tax
increases are unlikely and many cuts and budget adjustments have been made in
the past three years.
The State's severe financial difficulties for the current and upcoming budget
years will result in continued pressure upon various local governments,
particularly school districts and counties which depend on State aid. Despite
efforts in recent years to increase taxes and reduce governmental
expenditures, there can be no assurance that the State will not face budget
gaps in the future.
State general obligation bonds are currently rated "A1"by Moody's and
"A"by S&P. Both of these ratings were recently reduced from "
Aa"and "A+"levels, respectively. There can be no assurance that
such ratings will be maintained in the future. It should be noted that the
creditworthiness of obligations issued by local California issuers may be
unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the State of
California, and that there is no obligation on the part of the State to make
payment on such local obligations in the event of default.
The State is involved in certain legal proceedings (described in the State's
recent financial statements) that, if decided against the State, may require
the State to make significant future expenditures or may substantially impair
revenues.
Property tax revenues received by local governments declined more than 50%
following passage of Proposition 13. Subsequently, the California Legislature
enacted measures to provide for the redistribution of the State's General Fund
surplus to local agencies, the reallocation of certain State revenues to local
agencies and the assumption of certain governmental functions by the State to
assist municipal issuers to raise revenues. Total local assistance from the
State's General Fund was budgeted at approximately 75% of General Fund
expenditures in recent years, including the effect of implementing reductions
in certain aid programs. To reduce State General Fund support for school
districts, the 1992-93 and 1993-94 Budget Acts caused local governments to
transfer $3.9 billion of property tax revenues to school districts,
representing loss of the post-Proposition 13 "bailout"aid. Local
governments have in return received greater revenues and greater flexibility
to operate health and welfare programs. To the extent the State should be
constrained by its Article XIIIB appropriations limit, or its obligation to
conform to Proposition 98, or other fiscal considerations, the absolute level,
or the rate of growth, of State assistance to local governments may be
reduced. Any such reductions in State aid could compound the serious fiscal
constraints already experienced by many local governments, particularly
counties. The Richmond Unified School District (Contra Costa County) entered
bankruptcy proceedings in May 1991, but the proceedings have been dismissed.
California Municipal Obligations which are assessment bonds may be adversely
affected by a general decline in real estate values or a slowdown in real
estate sales activity. In many cases, such bonds are secured by land which is
undeveloped at the time of issuance but anticipated to be developed within a
few years after issuance. In the event of such reduction or slowdown, such
development may not occur or may be delayed, thereby increasing the risk of a
default on the bonds. Because the special assessments or taxes securing these
bonds are not the personal liability of the owners of the property assessed,
the lien on the property is the only security for the bonds. Moreover, in most
cases the issuer of these bonds is not required to make payments on the bonds
in the event of delinquency in the payment of assessments or taxes, except
from amounts, if any, in a reserve fund established for the bonds.
Certain California long-term lease obligations, though typically payable from
the general fund of the municipality, are subject to "abatement"in
the event the facility being leased is unavailable for beneficial use and
occupancy by the municipality during the term of the lease. Abatement is not a
default, and there may be no remedies available to the holders of the
certificates evidencing the lease obligation in the event abatement occurs.
The most common cases of abatement are failure to complete construction of the
facility before the end of the period during which lease payments have been
capitalized and uninsured casualty losses to the facility (e.g., due to
earthquake). In the event abatement occurs with respect to a lease obligation,
lease payments may be interrupted (if all available insurance proceeds and
reserves are exhausted) and the certificates may not be paid when due.
Several years ago the Richmond Unified School District (the "District"
) entered into a lease transaction in which certain existing properties of the
District were sold and leased back in order to obtain funds to cover operating
deficits. Following a fiscal crisis in which the District's finances were
taken over by a State receiver (including a brief period under bankruptcy
court protection), the District failed to make rental payments on this lease,
resulting in a lawsuit by the Trustee for the Certificate of Participation
holders, in which the State was a named defendant (on the grounds that it
controlled the District's finances). One of the defenses raised in answer to
this lawsuit was the invalidity of the original lease transaction. The trial
court has upheld the validity of the District's lease, and the case has been
settled. Any judgment in any future case against the position asserted by the
Trustee in the Richmond case may have adverse implications for lease
transactions of a similar nature by other California entities.
The repayment of industrial development securities secured by real property
may be affected by California laws limiting foreclosure rights of creditors.
Securities backed by health care and hospital revenues may be affected by
changes in State regulations governing cost reimbursements to health care
providers under Medi-Cal (the State's Medicaid program), including risks
related to the policy of awarding exclusive contracts to certain hospitals.
Limitations on ad valorem property taxes may particularly affect "tax
allocation"bonds issued by California redevelopment agencies. Such bonds
are secured solely by the increase in assessed valuation of a redevelopment
project area after the start of redevelopment activity. In the event that
assessed values in the redevelopment project decline (e.g., because of a major
natural disaster such as an earthquake), the tax increment revenue may be
insufficient to make principal and interest payments on these bonds. Both
Moody's and S&P suspended ratings on California tax allocation bonds after the
enactment of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB, and only resumed such ratings on a
selective basis.
Proposition 87, approved by California voters in 1988, requires that all
revenues produced by a tax rate increase go directly to the taxing entity
which increased such tax rate to repay that entity's general obligation
indebtedness. As a result, redevelopment agencies (which, typically, are the
Issuers of tax allocation securities) no longer receive an increase in tax
increment when taxes on property in the project area are increased to repay
voter-approved bonded indebtedness.
The effect of these various constitutional and statutory changes upon the
ability of California municipal securities issuers to pay interest and
principal on their obligations remains unclear. Furthermore, other measures
affecting the taxing or spending authority of California or its political
subdivisions may be approved or enacted in the future. Legislation has been or
may be introduced which would modify existing taxes or other revenue-raising
measures or which either would further limit or, alternatively, would increase
the abilities of state and local governments to impose new taxes or increase
existing taxes. It is not presently possible to determine the impact of any
such legislation on California Municipal Obligations in which the Fund may
invest, future allocations of state revenues to local governments or the
abilities of state or local governments to pay the interest on, or repay the
principal of, such California Municipal Obligations.
Substantially all of California is within an active geologic region subject to
major seismic activity. Any California Municipal Obligation in the Portfolio
could be affected by an interruption of revenues because of damaged
facilities, or, consequently, income tax deductions for casualty losses or
property tax assessment reductions. Compensatory financial assistance could be
constrained by the inability of (i) an issuer to have obtained earthquake
insurance coverage at reasonable rates; (ii) an insurer to perform on its
contracts of insurance in the event of widespread losses; or (iii) the Federal
or State government to appropriate sufficient funds within their respective
budget limitations.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
California IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, special counsel to the Fund
for California tax matters, under existing California income and property tax
law applicable to individuals who are California residents:
the California IM-IT Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation and
the income of the California IM-IT Trust will be treated as the income of the
Unitholders under the income tax laws of California;
amounts treated as interest on the underlying Securities in the California
IM-IT Trust which are exempt from tax under California personal income tax and
property tax laws when received by the California IM-IT Trust will, under such
laws, retain their status as tax-exempt interest when distributed to
Unitholders. However, interest on the underlying Securities attributed to a
Unitholder which is a corporation subject to the California franchise tax laws
may be includable in its gross income for purposes of determining its
California franchise tax. Further, certain interest which is attributable to a
Unitholder subject to the California personal income tax and which is treated
as an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum
tax pursuant to Section 57(a)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 may also
be treated as an item of tax preference that must be taken into account in
computing such Unitholder's alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of
the California alternative minimum tax enacted by 1987 California Statutes,
chapter 1138. However, because of the provisions of the California
Constitution exempting the interest on bonds issued by the State of
California, or by local governments within the state, from taxes levied on
income, the application of the new California alternative minimum tax to
interest otherwise exempt from the California personal income tax in some
cases may be unclear;
under California income tax law, each Unitholder in the California IM-IT Trust
will have a taxable event when the California IM-IT Trust disposes of a
Security (whether by sale, exchange, redemption, or payment at maturity) or
when the Unitholder redeems or sells Units. Because of the requirement that
tax cost basis be reduced to reflect amortization of bond premium, under some
circumstances a Unitholder may realize taxable gains when Units are sold or
redeemed for an amount equal to, or less than, their original cost. The total
cost of each Unit in the California IM-IT Trust to a Unitholder is allocated
among each of the Bond issues held in the California IM-IT Trust (in
accordance with the proportion of the California IM-IT Trust comprised by each
Bond issue) in order to determine his per Unit tax cost for each Bond issue;
and the tax cost reduction requirements relating to amortization of bond
premium will apply separately to the per Unit tax cost of each Bond issue.
Unitholders' bases in their units, and the bases for their fractional interest
in each Trust asset, may have to be adjusted for their pro rata share of
accrued interest received, if any, on Securities delivered after the
Unitholders' respective settlement dates;
under the California personal property tax laws, bonds (including the
Securities in the California IM-IT Trust) or any interest therein is exempt
from such tax;
any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the California IM-IT
Trust with respect to the Securities which represent maturing interest on
defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be exempt from California
personal income tax if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so exempt if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations; and
under Section 17280(b)(2) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code,
interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry Units of
the California IM-IT Trust is not deductible for the purposes of the
California personal income tax. While there presently is no California
authority interpreting this provision, Section 17280(b)(2) directs the
California Franchise Tax Board to prescribe regulations determining the proper
allocation and apportionment of interest costs for this purpose. The Franchise
Tax Board has not yet proposed or prescribed such regulations. In interpreting
the generally similar Federal provision, the Internal Revenue Service has
taken the position that such indebtedness need not be directly traceable to
the purchase or carrying of Units (although the Service has not contended that
a deduction for interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve a
personal residence or to purchase goods or services for personal consumption
will be disallowed). In the absence of conflicting regulations or other
California authority, the California Franchise Tax Board generally has
interpreted California statutory tax provisions in accord with Internal
Revenue Service interpretations of similar Federal provisions.
At the respective times of issuance of the Securities, opinions relating to
the validity thereof and to the exemption of interest thereon from Federal
income tax and California personal income tax are rendered by bond counsel to
the respective issuing authorities. Except in certain instances in which
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe acted as bond counsel to issuers of Securities,
and as such made a review of proceedings relating to the issuance of certain
Securities at the time of their issuance, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has
not made any special review for the California IM-IT Trust of the proceedings
relating to the issuance of the Securities or of the basis for such opinions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per Unit Information:
<S> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit.................................... $ 62.08
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>................................. $ 1.89
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit......................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 60.19
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings Per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 60.19
Divided by 12................................................................ $ 5.02
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit......................... $ .16719
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>...... 6.02%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>....................................... 6.09%
Initial Distribution (December 1994).......................................... $ 4.68
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................... $ 5.02
Purchased Interest <F6>....................................................... $ 8.24
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>..........$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Record and Computation Dates.......FIRST day of each month
Distribution Dates ................FIFTEENTH day of each month commencing
December 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.18
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued"Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated annual
interest income per Unit will be increased to $62.26. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $2.07; and estimated net
annual interest income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."Based on the
outstanding principal amount of Securities as of the Date of Deposit, the
Trustee's annual fee would be $2,989.
<F2>Excluding insurance costs.
<F3>The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased for
transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4>The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated
net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no
assurance that the present Estimated Current Return indicated above will be
realized in the future. The Estimated Long-Term Return is calculated using a
formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the
relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account
the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated
retirements of all of the Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account
the expenses and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the
market values and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of
the Trust will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Long-Term Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated Current
Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and Public
Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders".
<F6>See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
CALIFORNIA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 133 (168TH INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate andMaturity Date of either Redemption California
Principal<F1> Bonds Deposited orBonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> IM-IT Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 Pioneers Memorial Hospital District (Imperial County,
California) General Obligation Bonds, Series 1994 (AMBAC 2004 @ 102
Indemnity Insured) #6.40% Due 10/1/2017 ....................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. $ 489,005
350,000 County of Sacramento, California, 1994 Public Facilities Project
(Coroner Lab and Data Center) Certificates of Participation 2004 @ 102
(AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 6.40% Due 10/1/2019 .................. YAAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 341,142
100,000 State Public Works Board of the State of California, Lease
Revenue Bonds (Department of Corrections) Series 1993B
(California State Prison-Fresno County, Coalinga) MBIA Insured 2003 @ 102
#5.375% Due 12/1/2019 ........................................... AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 83,454
500,000 State of California, Various Purpose General Obligation Bonds 2002 @ 102
(MBIA Insured) #6.00% Due 10/1/2021 ............................ AAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 459,320
100,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
Certificates of Participation (Catholic Healthcare West 2003 @ 102
Obligated Group) MBIA Insured #5.50% Due 7/1/2023 .............. AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 84,184
500,000 The Regents of the University of California (California) Revenue
Bonds (Multiple Purpose Projects) Series D (MBIA Insured) 2002 @ 102
6.375% Due 9/1/2024 ............................................. AAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 481,580
500,000 California Housing Finance Agency, Housing Revenue Bonds,
Series 1994E (MBIA Insured)** 6.75% Due 8/1/2026 ............... YAAA 2005 @ 102 500,000
500,000 Los Angeles, California, Department of Water and Power, Electric
Plant Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (MBIA Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.875% Due 9/1/2030 ............................................ YAAA 2024 @ 100 S.F. 443,635
$ 3,050,000 $ 2,882,320
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
FLORIDA IM-IT TRUST
General. The Florida IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities. None of
the Bonds in the Florida IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them or are backed by the taxing power thereof.
All of the issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Florida IM-IT Trust) as follows: Retail Electric/Gas, 3 (38%); Water and
Sewer, 2 (25%); Public Education, 1 (17%); Certificates of Participation, 1
(15%) and General Purpose, 1 (5%). No Bond issue has received a provisional
rating.
Risk Factors. Florida's economy has in the past been highly dependent on the
construction industry and construction related manufacturing. This dependency
has declined in recent years and continues to do so as a result of continued
diversification of the State's economy. For example, in 1980 total contract
construction employment as a share of total non-farm employment was just over
seven percent and in 1993 the share had edged downward to five percent. This
trend is expected to continue as Florida's economy continues to diversify.
Florida, nevertheless, has a dynamic construction industry with single and
multi-family housing starts accounting for 8.5% of total U.S. housing starts
in 1993 while the State's population is 5.3% of the U.S. total population.
Florida's housing starts since 1980 have represented an average of 11.0% of
the U.S.'s total annual starts, and since 1980 total housing starts have
averaged 156,450 a year.
A driving force behind the State's construction industry has been the State's
rapid rate of population growth. Although Florida currently is the fourth most
populous state (with an estimated population of 13.4 million), its annual
population growth is now projected to decline as the number of people moving
into the State is expected to hover near the mid 250,000 range annually
throughout the 1990s. This population trend should provide fuel for business
and home builders to keep construction activity lively in Florida for some
time to come. However, other factors do influence the level of construction in
the State. For example, Federal tax reform in 1986 and other changes to the
Federal income tax code have eliminated tax deductions for owners of two or
more residential real estate properties and have lengthened depreciation
schedules on investment and commercial properties. Economic growth and
existing supplies of commercial buildings and homes also contribute to the
level of construction activity in the State.
Since 1980, the State's job creation rate is almost twice the rate for the
nation as a whole, and its growth rate in new non-agricultural jobs is the
fastest of the 11 most populous states and second only to California in the
absolute number of new jobs created. Contributing to the State's rapid rate of
growth in employment and income is international trade. Since 1980, the
State's unemployment rate has generally been below that of the U.S. In recent
years, however, as the State's economic growth has slowed from its previous
highs, the State's unemployment rate has tracked above the national average.
The average in Florida since 1980 has been 6.5% while the national average is
7.1%. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Florida Department of
Labor and Employment Security, and the Florida Consensus Economic Estimating
Conference (together the "Organization") the State's unemployment rate
was 8.2% during 1992. As of January, 1994, the Organization estimates that the
unemployment rate will be 6.7% for 1993-94 and 6.1% in 1994-95.
The rate of job creation in Florida's manufacturing sector has exceeded that
of the U.S. From the beginning of 1980 through 1993, the State added over
50,100 new manufacturing jobs, an 11.7% increase. During the same period,
national manufacturing employment declined ten out of the fourteen years, for
a loss of 2,977,000 jobs.
Total non-farm employment in Florida is expected to increase 2.7% in 1993-94
and rise 3.8% in 1994-95. Trade and services, the two largest figures, account
for more than half of the total non-farm employment. Employment in the service
sectors should experience an increase of 3.9% in 1993-94, while growing 4.9%
in 1994-95. Trade is expected to expand 2.2% in 1994 and 3.4% in 1995. The
service sector is now the State's largest employment category.
Tourism is one of Florida's most important industries. Approximately 40.9
million tourists visited the State in 1992, as reported by the Florida
Department of Commence. In terms of business activities and state tax
revenues, tourists in Florida in 1992 represented an estimated 4.5 million
additional residents. Visitors to the State tend to arrive equally by air and
car. The State's tourism industry over the years has become more
sophisticated, attracting visitors year-round and, to a degree, reducing its
seasonality. Tourist arrivals are expected to decline by almost two percent
this year, but recover next year with 5.0% growth. By the end of the State's
current fiscal year, 41.0 million domestic and international tourists are
expected to have visited the State. In 1994-95, tourist arrivals should
approximate 43.0 million.
The State's per capita personal income in 1992 of $19,947 was slightly below
the national average of $19,841 and significantly ahead of that for the
southeast United States, which was $17,661. Real personal income in the State
is estimated to increase 5.5% in 1993-94 and 4.7% in 1994-95. By the end of
1994-95, real personal income per capita in the State is projected to average
6.7% higher than its 1992-93 level.
Compared to other states, Florida has a proportionately greater retirement age
population which comprises 18.3% (as of April 1, 1991) of the State's
population and is forecast to grow at an average annual rate of over 1.96%
through the 1990s. Thus, property income (dividends, interest, and rent) and
transfer payments (Social Security and pension benefits, among other sources
of income) are a relatively more important source of income. For example,
Florida's total wages and salaries and other labor income in 1992 was 61% of
total income, while a similar figure for the nation for 1992 was 72.0%.
Transfer payments are typically less sensitive to the business cycle than
employment income and, therefore, act as stabilizing forces in weak economic
periods. While many of the U.S.'s senior citizens choose the State as their
place of retirement, the State is also recognized as attracting a significant
number of working age people. Since 1982, the prime working age population
(18-44) has grown at an average annual rate of 3.3%.
In fiscal year 1991-92, approximately 64% of the State's total direct revenue
to its three operating funds was derived from State taxes, with federal grants
and other special revenue accounting for the balance. State sales and use tax,
corporate income tax, and beverage tax amounted to 68%, 7% and 5%,
respectively, of total receipts by the General Revenue Fund during fiscal year
1991-92. In that same year, expenditures for education, health and welfare,
and public safety amounted to 53%, 30% and 13.3%, respectively, of total
expenditures from the General Revenue Fund.
Hurricane Andrew left some parts of south Florida devastated. Post-Hurricane
Andrew clean up and rebuilding have changed the outlook for the State's
economy. Single and multi-family housing starts in 1993-94 are projected to
reach a combined level of 118,000, and to increase to 134,300 next year.
Lingering recessionary effects on consumers and tight credit are two of the
reasons for relatively slow core construction activity, as well as lingering
effects from the 1986 tax reform legislation discussed above. However,
construction is one of the sectors most severely affected by Hurricane Andrew.
Low interest rates and pent up demand combined with improved consumer
confidence should lead to improved housing starts. The construction figures
above include additional housing starts as a result of destruction by
Hurricane Andrew. Total construction expenditures are forecasted to increase
15.6% this year and increase 13.3% next year.
The State Constitution and statutes mandate that the State budget, as a whole,
and each separate fund within the State budget, be kept in balance from
currently available revenues each fiscal year. If the Governor or Comptroller
believes a deficit will occur in any State fund, by statute, he must certify
his opinion to the Administrative Commission, which then is authorized to
reduce all State agency budgets and releases by a sufficient amount to prevent
a deficit in any fund. Additionally, the State Constitution prohibits issuance
of State obligations to fund State operations.
Estimated fiscal year 1993-94 General Revenue plus Working Capital funds
available total $13,582.7 million, an 8.4% increase over 1992-93. This
reflects a transfer of $190 million, out of an estimated $220.0 million in
non-recurring revenue due to Andrew, to a hurricane relief trust fund. Of the
total General Revenue plus Working Capital funds available to the State,
$12,943.5 million of that is Estimated Revenues (excluding the Andrew impact)
which represents an increase of 7.3% over the previous year's Estimated
Revenues. With effective General Revenues plus Working Capital Fund
appropriations at $13,276.9 million, unencumbered reserves at the end of
1993-94 are estimated at $305.8 million. Estimated, fiscal year 1994-95
General Revenue plus Working Capital funds available total $14,293.5 million,
a 5.2% increase over 1993-94. This amount reflects a transfer of $159.00
million in non-recurring revenue due to Hurricane Andrew, to a hurricane
relief trust fund. The $13,877.2 million in Estimated Revenues (excluding the
Hurricane Andrew impact) represent an increase of 7.2% over the previous
year's Estimated Revenues. The massive effort to rebuild and replace destroyed
or damaged property in the wake of Andrew is responsible for the substantial
positive revenue impacts shown here. Most of the impact is in the increase in
the State's sales tax.
In fiscal year 1992-93, approximately 62% of the State's total direct revenue
to its three operating funds were derived from State taxes, with Federal
grants and other special revenue accounting for the balance. State sales and
use tax, corporate income tax, intangible personal property tax, and beverage
tax amounted to 68%, 7%, 4%, and 4%, respectively, of total General Revenue
Funds available during fiscal 1992-93. In that same year, expenditures for
education, health and welfare, and public safety amounted to approximately
49%, 30%, and 11%, respectively, of total expenditures from the General
Revenue Fund.
The State's sales and use tax (6%) currently accounts for the State's single
largest source of tax receipts. Slightly less than 10% of the State's sales
and use tax is designated for local governments and is distributed to the
respective counties in which collected for such use by such counties and the
municipalities therein. In addition to this distribution, local governments
may (by referendum) assess a 0.5% or a 1.0% discretionary sales tax within
their county. Proceeds from this local option sales tax are earmarked for
funding local infrastructure programs and acquiring land for public recreation
or conservation or protection of natural resources as provided under Florida
law. Certain charter counties have other taxing powers in addition, and
non-consolidated counties with a population in excess of 800,000 may levy a
local option sales tax to fund indigent health care. It alone cannot exceed
0.5% and when combined with the infrastructure surtax cannot exceed 1.0%. For
the fiscal year ended June 30, 1993, sales and use tax receipts (exclusive of
the tax on gasoline and special fuels) totalled $9,426.0 million, an increase
of 12.5% over fiscal year 1991-92.
The second largest source of State tax receipts is the tax on motor fuels.
However, these revenues are almost entirely dedicated trust funds for specific
purposes and are not included in the State's General Revenue Fund.
The State imposes an alcoholic beverage wholesale tax (excise tax) on beer,
wine, and liquor. This tax is one of the State's major tax sources, with
revenues totalling $442.2 million in fiscal year ending June 30, 1993.
Alcoholic beverage tax receipts declined 1.6% over the previous year. The
revenues collected from this tax are deposited into the State's General
Revenue Fund.
The State imposes a corporate income tax. All receipts of the corporate income
tax are credited to the General Revenue Fund. For the fiscal year ended June
30, 1993, receipts from this source were $846.6 million, an increase of 5.6%
from fiscal year 1991-92.
The State imposes a documentary stamp tax on deeds and other documents
relating to realty, corporate shares, bonds, certificates of indebtedness,
promissory notes, wage assignments, and retail charge accounts. The
documentary stamp tax collections totaled $639.0 million during fiscal year
1992-93, a 27.0% increase from the previous fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal
year 1992-93, 71.29% of these taxes are to be deposited to the General Revenue
Fund.
The State imposes a gross receipts tax on electric, natural gas, and
telecommunications services. All gross receipts utilities tax collections are
credited to the State's Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust
Fund. In fiscal year 1992-93, this amounted to $447.9 million.
The State imposes an intangible personal property tax on stocks, bonds,
including bonds secured by liens in Florida real property, notes, governmental
leaseholds, and certain other intangibles not secured by a lien on Florida
real property. The annual rate of tax is 2 mils. Second, the State imposes a
non-recurring 2 mil tax on mortgages and other obligations secured by liens on
Florida real property. In fiscal year 1992-93, total intangible personal
property tax collections were $783.4 million, a 33% increase over the prior
year. Of the tax proceeds, 66.5% are distributed to the General Revenue Fund.
The State began its own lottery in 1988. State law requires that lottery
revenues be distributed 50% to the public in prizes, 38% for use in enhancing
education, and the balance, 12.0% for costs of administering the lottery.
Fiscal year 1992-93 lottery ticket sales totalled $2.13 billion, providing
education with $810.4 million.
The State's severance tax applies to oil, gas, and sulphur production, as well
as the severance of phosphate rock and other solid minerals. Total collections
from severance taxes total $64.5 million during fiscal year 1992-93, down 4.0%
from the previous year. Currently, 60.0% of this amount is transferred to the
General Revenue Fund.
The State has continuously been dependent on the highly cyclical construction
and construction related manufacturing industries. While that dependency has
decreased, the State is still somewhat at the mercy of the construction and
construction related manufacturing industries. The construction industry is
driven to a great extent by the State's rapid growth in population. There can
be no assurance that population growth will in fact continue throughout the
1990's in which case there could be an adverse impact on the State's economy
through the loss of construction and construction related manufacturing jobs.
Also, while interest rates remain low currently, an increase in interest rates
could significantly adversely impact the financing of new construction within
the State, thereby adversely impacting unemployment and other economic factors
within the State. In addition, available commercial office space has tended to
remain high over the past few years. So long as this glut of commercial rental
space continues, construction of this type of space will likely continue to
remain slow.
At the end of fiscal 1993, approximately $5.61 billion in principal amount of
debt secured by the full faith and credit of the State was outstanding. In
addition, since July 1, 1993, the State issued about $873.0 million in
principal amount of full faith and credit bonds.
The State Constitution and statutes mandate that the State budget, as a whole,
and each separate fund within the State budget, be kept in balance from
currently available revenues each fiscal year. If the Governor or Comptroller
believe a deficit will occur in any State fund, by statute, he must certify
his opinion to the Administrative Commission, which then is authorized to
reduce all State agency budgets and releases by a sufficient amount to prevent
a deficit in any fund. Additionally, the State Constitution prohibits issuance
of State obligations to fund State operations.
Currently under litigation are several issues relating to State actions or
State taxes that put at risk substantial amounts of General Revenue Fund
monies. Accordingly, there is no assurance that any of such matters,
individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse affect on
Florida's financial position.
Florida law provides preferential tax treatment to insurers who maintain a
home office in the State. Certain insurers challenged the constitutionality of
this tax preference and sought a refund of taxes paid. Recently, the State
Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State. This case and others, along with
pending refund claims, total about $150 million.
Florida maintains a bond rating of Aa and AA from Moody's Investors Service
and Standard & Poor's Corporation, respectively, on the majority of its
general obligation bonds, although the rating of a particular series of
revenue bonds relates primarily to the project, facility, or other revenue
sources from which such series derives funds for repayment. While these
ratings and some of the information presented above indicate that Florida is
in satisfactory economic health, there can be no assurance that there will not
be a decline in economic conditions or that particular Municipal Obligations
purchased by the Fund will not be adversely affected by any such changes.
The sources for the information presented above include official statements
and financial statements of the State of Florida. While the Sponsor has not
independently verified this information, the Sponsor has no reason to believe
that the information is not correct in all material respects.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Florida IM-IT Trust units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
The Bonds were accompanied by opinions of Bond Counsel to the respective
issuers thereof to the effect that the Bonds were exempt from the Florida
intangibles tax. Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently
reviewed such opinions or examined the Bonds to be deposited in and held by
the Florida IM-IT Trust and have assumed the correctness as of the date of
deposit of the opinions of Bond Counsel.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, counsel to the Sponsor, under existing
law:
For Florida state income tax purposes, the Florida IM-IT Trust will not be
subject to the Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida Statutes. In
addition, Florida does not impose any income taxes at the local level.
Because Florida does not impose an income tax on individuals, non-corporate
Unitholders residing in Florida will not be subject to any Florida income
taxation on income realized by the Florida IM-IT Trust. Any amounts paid to
the Florida IM-IT Trust or to non-corporate Unitholders residing in Florida
under an insurance policy issued to the Florida IM-IT Trust or the Sponsor
which represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee
will not be subject to the Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida
Statutes.
Corporate Unitholders with commercial domiciles in Florida will be subject to
Florida income or franchise taxation on income realized by the Florida IM-IT
Trust and on payments of interest pursuant to any insurance policy. Other
corporate Unitholders will be subject to Florida income or franchise taxation
on income realized by the Florida IM-IT Trust (or on payments of interest
pursuant to any insurance policy) only to the extent that the income realized
does not constitute "non-business income"as defined by Chapter 220.
Units will be subject to Florida estate tax only if held by Florida residents.
However, the Florida estate tax is limited to the amount of the credit for
state death taxes provided for in Section 2011 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Neither the Bonds nor the Units will be subject to the Florida ad valorem
property tax, the Florida intangibles personal property tax or Florida sales
or use tax.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per Unit Information:
<S> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit.................................... $ 59.98
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>................................. $ 1.84
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit......................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 58.14
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings Per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 58.14
Divided by 12................................................................ $ 4.85
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit......................... $ .16149
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>...... 5.81%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>....................................... 5.87%
Initial Distribution (December 1994).......................................... $ 4.52
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................... $ 4.85
Purchased Interest <F6>....................................................... $ 10.02
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>..........$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Record and Computation Dates.......FIRST day of each month
Distribution Dates ................FIFTEENTH day of each month commencing
December 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.14
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued"Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated annual
interest income per Unit will be increased to $60.12. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $1.98; and estimated net
annual interest income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."Based on the
outstanding principal amount of Securities as of the Date of Deposit, the
Trustee's annual fee would be $2,930.
<F2>Excluding insurance costs.
<F3>The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased for
transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4>The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated
net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no
assurance that the present Estimated Current Return indicated above will be
realized in the future. The Estimated Long-Term Return is calculated using a
formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the
relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account
the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated
retirements of all of the Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account
the expenses and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the
market values and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of
the Trust will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Long-Term Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated Current
Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and Public
Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders".
<F6>See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
FLORIDA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 85 (168TH INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate andMaturity Date of either Redemption Florida
Principal<F1> Bonds Deposited orBonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> IM-IT Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 North Palm Beach Heights, Florida, Water Control District
Refunding Revenue Bonds, Special Assessment Series B (MBIA 2002 @ 102
Insured) #6.50% Due 10/1/2012 .................................. AAA 2006 @ 100 S.F. $ 506,745
440,000 Alachua County, Florida, School Board Certificates of
Participation (MBIA Insured) 6.20% Due 7/1/2014 ................ AAA 2003 @ 102 430,210
350,000 City of Delray Beach, Florida, Utilities Tax Revenue Refunding
andImprovement Bonds (Bank Qualified) Series 1994 (MBIA 2004 @ 102
Insured)** #6.355% Due 6/1/2016 YAAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 347,676
300,000 North Port, Florida, Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 (FGIC 2002 @ 102
Insured) 6.25% Due 10/1/2017 AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 293,649
250,000 Village Center Community Development District, Florida, Utility
Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (FGIC Insured) #6.00% Due 11/1/2018 AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 239,068
500,000 Florida State Board of Education, Capital Outlay Public 2002 @ 101
Education Bonds, Series B (MBIA Insured) #6.00% Due 6/1/2022 AAA 2016 @ 100 S.F. 467,575
150,000 Orange County, Florida, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 1993B 2003 @ 102
(FGIC Insured) #5.375% Due 1/1/2024 AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 124,423
500,000 Martin County, Florida, Consolidated Utilities System Refunding
and Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 1994 (FGIC Insured) #6.00% 2004 @ 102
Due 10/1/2024 AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 469,680
$ 2,990,000 $ 2,879,026
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
MINNESOTA IM-IT TRUST
General. The Minnesota IM-IT Trust consists of 9 issues of Securities. Five of
the Bonds in the Minnesota IM-IT Trust are general obligations of the
governmental entities issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof.
The remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Minnesota IM-IT Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 5 (65%); Health
Care, 3 (19%) and Single Family Mortgage Revenue, 1 (16%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. In the early 1980's the State of Minnesota experienced financial
difficulties due to a downturn in the State's economy resulting from the
national recession. As a consequence, the State's revenues were significantly
lower than anticipated in the July 1, 1979 to June 30, 1981 biennium and the
July 1, 1981 to June 30, 1983 biennium.
In response to revenue shortfalls, the legislature broadened and increased the
State sales tax, increased income taxes (by increasing rates and eliminating
deductions) and reduced appropriations and deferred payment of State aid,
including appropriations for and aids to local governmental units. The State's
fiscal problems affected other governmental units within the State, such as
local government, school districts and state agencies, which, in varying
degrees, also faced cash flow difficulties. In certain cases, revenues of
local governmental units and agencies were reduced by the recession.
Because of the State's fiscal problems, Standard & Poor's Corporation reduced
its rating on the State's outstanding general obligation bonds from AAA to AA+
in August 1981 and to AA in March 1982. Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
lowered its rating on the State's outstanding general obligation bonds from
Aaa to Aa in April 1982. The State's economy recovered in the July 1, 1983 to
June 30, 1985 biennium, and substantial reductions in the individual income
tax were enacted in 1984 and 1985. Standard & Poor's raised its rating on the
State's outstanding general obligation bonds to AA+ in January 1985. In 1986,
1987, 1991, 1992 and 1993, legislation was required to eliminate projected
budget deficits by raising additional revenue, reducing expenditures,
including aids to political subdivisions and higher education, reducing the
State's budget reserve (cash flow account), imposing a sales tax on purchases
by local governmental units, and making other budgetary adjustments. A budget
forecast released by the Minnesota Department of Finance on March 1, 1994
projects a balanced General Fund at the end of the current biennium, June 30,
1995, plus an increase in the State's cash flow account from $360 million to
$500 million. Total projected expenditures and transfers for the biennium are
$17.0 billion. The forecast also projects, however, a shortage of $29.5
million in the Local Government Trust Fund at June 30, 1995, against total
projected expenditures from the Fund of $1.8 billion for the biennium.
State grants and aids represent a large percentage of the total revenues of
cities, towns, counties and school districts in Minnesota. Even with respect
to Bonds that are revenue obligations of the issuer and not general
obligations of the State, there can be no assurance that the fiscal problems
referred to above will not adversely affect the market value or marketability
of the Bonds or the ability of the respective obligors to pay interest on and
principal of the Bonds.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Minnesota IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
We understand that the Minnesota Trust will only have income consisting of (i)
interest from bonds issued by the State of Minnesota and its political and
governmental subdivisions, municipalities and governmental agencies and
instrumentalities and bonds issued by possessions of the United States which
would be exempt from federal and Minnesota income taxation when paid directly
to an individual, trust or estate (the "Bonds"), (ii) gain on the
disposition of such Bonds, and (iii) proceeds paid under certain insurance
policies issued to the Trustee or to the issuers of the Bonds which represent
maturing interest or principal payments on defaulted Bonds held by the
Trustee.
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the Bonds to
be deposited in and held in the Trust. However, although no opinion is
expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that: (i) the Bonds
were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is excludible from gross income
for federal income tax purposes and (iii) the interest thereon is exempt from
income tax imposed by Minnesota that is applicable to individuals, trusts and
estates (the "Minnesota Income Tax"). It should be noted that interest
on the Bonds is subject to tax in the case of corporations subject to the
Minnesota Corporate Franchise Tax or the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax and
is a factor in the computation of the Minimum Fee applicable to financial
institutions. The opinion set forth below does not address the taxation of
persons other than full time residents of Minnesota.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, Counsel to the Sponsor, under existing
Minnesota income tax law as of the date of this prospectus and based upon the
assumptions above:
The Minnesota Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation and each
Unitholder of the Minnesota Trust will be treated as the owner of a pro rata
portion of the Minnesota Trust, and the income of such portion of the
Minnesota Trust will therefore be treated as the income of the Unitholder for
Minnesota Income Tax purposes;
Income on the Bonds which is exempt from the Minnesota Income Tax when
received by a Unitholder of the Minnesota Trust and which would be exempt from
the Minnesota Income Tax if received directly by a Unitholder, will retain its
status as exempt from such tax when received by the Minnesota Trust and
distributed to such Unitholder;
To the extent that interest on the Bonds, if any, which is includible in the
computation of "alternative minimum taxable income"for federal income
tax purposes, such interest will also be includible in the computation of "
alternative minimum taxable income"for purposes of the Minnesota
Alternative Minimum Tax imposed on individuals, estates and trusts and on
corporations;
Each Unitholder of the Minnesota Trust will recognize gain or loss for
Minnesota Income Tax purposes if the Trustee disposes of a Bond (whether by
redemption, sale or otherwise) or if the Unitholder redeems or sells Units of
the Minnesota Trust to the extent that such a transaction results in a
recognized gain or loss to such Unitholder for federal income tax purposes;
Tax cost reduction requirements relating to amortization of bond premium may,
under some circumstances, result in Unitholders realizing taxable gain for
Minnesota Income Tax purposes when their Units are sold or redeemed for an
amount equal to or less than their original cost;
Proceeds, if any, paid under individual insurance policies obtained by issuers
of Bonds or the Trustee which represent maturing interest on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee will be excludible from Minnesota net income
if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have been so excludible
from Minnesota net income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would
have been so excludible if paid in the normal course by the issuer of the
defaulted obligation provided that, at the time such policies are purchased,
the amounts paid for such policies are reasonable, customary and consistent
with the reasonable expectation that the issuer of the bonds, rather than the
insurer, will pay debt service on the bonds; and
To the extent that interest derived from the Minnesota Trust by a Unitholder
with respect to any Possession Bonds is excludible from gross income for
federal income tax purposes pursuant to 48 U.S.C. Section 745, 48 U.S.C.
Section 1423a and 48 U.S.C. Section 1403, such interest will not be subject to
either the Minnesota Income Tax or the Minnesota alternative minimum tax
imposed on individuals, estates and trusts. It should be noted that interest
relating to Possession Bonds is subject to tax in the case of corporations
subject to the Minnesota Corporate Franchise Tax or the Corporate Alternative
Minimum Tax.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in the
Minnesota Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the opinions of
bond counsel with respect thereto, and therefore express no opinions to the
exemption from State income taxes of interest on the Bonds if received
directly by a Unitholder.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per Unit Information:
<S> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit.................................... $ 59.32
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>................................. $ 1.51
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit......................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 57.81
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings Per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 57.81
Divided by 12................................................................ $ 4.82
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit......................... $ .16059
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>...... 5.78%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>....................................... 5.92%
Initial Distribution (December 1994).......................................... $ 4.50
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................... $ 4.82
Purchased Interest <F6>....................................................... $ 9.98
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>..........$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Record and Computation Dates.......FIRST day of each month
Distribution Dates ................FIFTEENTH day of each month commencing
December 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.56
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued"Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated annual
interest income per Unit will be increased to $59.88. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $2.07; and estimated net
annual interest income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."Based on the
outstanding principal amount of Securities as of the Date of Deposit, the
Trustee's annual fee would be $3,063.
<F2>Excluding insurance costs.
<F3>The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased for
transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4>The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated
net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no
assurance that the present Estimated Current Return indicated above will be
realized in the future. The Estimated Long-Term Return is calculated using a
formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the
relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account
the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated
retirements of all of the Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account
the expenses and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the
market values and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of
the Trust will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Long-Term Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated Current
Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and Public
Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders".
<F6>See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
MINNESOTA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 54 (168TH INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate andMaturity Date of either Redemption Minnesota
Principal<F1> Bonds Deposited orBonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> IM-IT Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 600,000 St. Cloud, Minnesota, Independent School District No. 742,
Unlimited Tax-General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A
(FGIC Insured) 6.10% Due 2/1/2010 .............................. AAA 2003 @ 100 $ 589,206
600,000 Independent School District No. 11 (Anoka-Hennepin) Minnesota,
General Obligation School Building Bonds, Series 1994B (MBIA AAA 2004 @ 100 194,438
Insured)** #200M- 6.20% Due 2/1/2014 #400M- 6.20% Due 2/1/2015 AAA 2004 @ 100 387,672
325,000 Lakeville, Minnesota, Unlimited Tax-General Obligation
Improvement Park Bonds, Series 1994B (Capital Guaranty
Insured)** 6.20% Due 2/1/2015 .................................. AAA 2006 @ 100 315,692
500,000 Waconia, Minnesota, Independent School District No. 110,
Unlimited Tax-General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 1993A 2004 @ 100
(Capital Guaranty Insured) 5.45% Due 2/1/2015 .................. AAA 2012 @ 100 S.F. 436,660
250,000 City of Robbinsdale, Minnesota, Hospital Revenue Refunding
Bonds (North Memorial Medical Center Project) Series 1993A 2003 @ 102
(AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.55% Due 5/15/2019 ................. AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 216,848
100,000 Minneapolis, Minnesota, Health Care Facilities Authority,
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Fairview Hospital and Health Care 2003 @ 102
Project) Series A (MBIA Insured) #5.25% Due 11/15/2019.......... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 83,011
250,000 Plymouth, Minnesota, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds (Westhealth
Project) Series A (Capital Guaranty Insured) #6.125% Due 2004 @ 102
6/1/2024 ........................................................ AAA 2017 @ 100 S.F. 235,875
500,000 Minnesota State Housing Finance Agency, Single Family Mortgage
Bonds, Series 1994F (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 6.30% Due 2004 @ 102
7/1/2025 ........................................................YAAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 482,815
$ 3,125,000 $ 2,942,217
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
NEW YORK IM-IT INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY TRUST
General. The New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust consists of
11 issues of Securities. Seven of the Bonds in the New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust are general obligations of the governmental entities
issuing them and are backed by the taxing power thereof. The remaining issues
are payable from the income of a specific project or authority and are not
supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These issues are divided by
purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to total New York IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) as follows: General Obligations, 7
(55%); Transportation, 3 (37%) and Water and Sewer, 1 (8%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating. All of the obligations in the New York IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust mature within 5-10 years of the Date of
Deposit. Commencing in approximately the fifth year of the Trust, roughly 20%
of the Bonds contained in the Trust will mature each year. The dollar weighted
average maturity of the Bonds in the Trust is 6.68 years.
Risk Factors. A resident of New York State (or New York City) will be subject
to New York State (or New York City) personal income tax with respect to gains
realized when New York Obligations held in the New York Insured Trust are
sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when his Units are sold or redeemed,
such gain will equal the proceeds of sale, redemption or payment less the tax
basis of the New York Obligation or Unit (adjusted to reflect (a) the
amortization of premium or discount, if any, on New York Obligations held in
the Trust, (b) accrued original issue discount, with respect to each New York
Obligation which, at the time the New York Obligation was issued had original
issue discount, and (c) the deposit of New York Obligations with accrued
interest in the Trust after the Unitholder's settlement date).
Interest or gain from the New York Insured Trust derived by a Unitholder who
is not a resident of New York State (or New York City) will not be subject to
New York State (or New York City) personal income tax, unless the Units are
property employed in a business, trade, profession or occupation carried on in
New York State (or New York City).
Amounts paid on defaulted New York Obligations held by the Trustee under
policies of insurance issued with respect to such New York Obligations will be
excludable from income for New York State and New York City income tax
purposes, if and to the same extent as, such interest would have been
excludable if paid by the respective issuer.
For purposes of the New York State and New York City franchise tax on
corporations, Unitholders which are subject to such tax will be required to
include in their entire net income any interest or gains distributed to them
even though distributed in respect of New York obligations.
If borrowed funds are used to purchase Units in the Trust, all (or part) of
the interest on such indebtedness will not be deductible for New York State
and New York City tax purposes. The purchase of Units may be considered to
have been made with borrowed funds even though such funds are not directly
traceable to the purchase of Units in any New York Trust.
The Portfolio of the New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust
includes obligations issued by New York State (the "State"), by its
various public bodies (the "Agencies"), and/or by other entities
located within the State, including the City of New York (the "City").
Some of the more significant events relating to the financial situation in New
York are summarized below. This section provides only a brief summary of the
complex factors affecting the financial situation in New York and is based in
part on Official Statements issued by, and on other information reported by
the State, the City and the Agencies in connection with the issuance of their
respective securities.
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local government finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of New York Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Trust or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
The State has historically been one of the wealthiest states in the nation.
For decades, however, the State economy has grown more slowly than that of the
nation as a whole, gradually eroding the State's relative economic affluence.
Statewide, urban centers have experienced significant changes involving
migration of the more affluent to the suburbs and an influx of generally less
affluent residents. Regionally, the older Northeast cities have suffered
because of the relative success that the South and the West have had in
attracting people and business. The City has also had to face greater
competition as other major cities have developed financial and business
capabilities which make them less dependent on the specialized services
traditionally available almost exclusively in the City.
The State has for many years had a very high state and local tax burden
relative to other states. The burden of State and local taxation, in
combination with the many other causes of regional economic dislocation, has
contributed to the decisions of some businesses and individuals to relocate
outside, or not locate within, the State.
A national recession commenced in mid-1990. The downturn continued throughout
the State's 1990-91 fiscal year and was followed by a period of weak economic
growth during the 1991 calendar year. For calendar year 1992, the national
economy continued to recover, although at a rate below all post-war
recoveries. For calendar year 1993, the economy is expected to grow faster
than 1992, but still at a very moderate rate, as compared to other recoveries.
The national recession has been more severe in the State because of factors
such as a significant retrenchment in the financial services industry,
cutbacks in defense spending, and an overbuilt real estate market.
1993-94 Fiscal Year. On April 5, 1993, the State Legislature approved a $32.08
billion budget. Following enactment of the budget the 1993-94 State Financial
Plan was formulated on April 16, 1993. This Plan projects General Fund
receipts and transfers from other funds at $32.367 billion and disbursements
and transfers to other funds at $32.300 billion. In comparison to the
Governor's recommended Executive Budget for the 1993-94 fiscal year, as
revised on February 18, 1993, the 1993-94 State Financial Plan reflects
increases in both receipts and disbursements in the General Fund of $811
million.
While a portion of the increased receipts was the result of a $487 million
increase in the State's 1992-93 positive year-end margin at March 31, 1993 to
$671 million, the balance of such increased receipts is based upon (i) a
projected $269 million increase in receipts resulting from improved 1992-93
results and the expectation of an improving economy, (ii) projected additional
payments of $200 million from the Federal government as reimbursements for
indigent medical care, (iii) the early payment of $50 million of personal tax
returns in 1992-93 which otherwise would have been paid in 1993-94; offset by
(iv) the State Legislature's failure to enact $195 million of additional
revenue-raising recommendations proposed by the Governor. There can be no
assurances that all of the projected receipts referred to above will be
received.
Despite the $811 million increase in disbursements included in the 1993-94
State Financial Plan, a reduction in aid to some local government units can be
expected. To offset a portion of such reductions, the 1993-94 State Financial
Plan contains a package of mandate relief, cost containment and other
proposals to reduce the costs of many programs for which local governments
provide funding. There can be no assurance, however, that localities that
suffer cuts will not be adversely affected, leading to further requests for
State financial assistance.
There can be no assurance that the State will not face substantial potential
budget gaps in the future resulting from a significant disparity between tax
revenues projected from a lower recurring receipts base and the spending
required to maintain State programs at current levels. To address any
potential budgetary imbalance, the State may need to take significant actions
to align recurring receipts and disbursements.
1992-93 Fiscal Year. Before giving effect to a 1992-93 year-end deposit to the
refund reserve account of $671 million, General Fund receipts in 1992-93 would
have been $716 million higher than originally projected. This year-end deposit
effectively reduced 1992-93 receipts by $671 million and made those receipts
available for 1993-94.
The State's favorable performance primarily resulted from income tax
collections that were $700 million higher than projected which reflected both
stronger economic activity and tax-induced one-time acceleration of income
into 1992. In other areas larger than projected business tax collections and
unbudgeted receipts offset the loss of $200 million of anticipated Federal
reimbursement and losses of, or shortfalls in, other projected revenue
sources.
For 1992-93, disbursements and transfers to other funds (including the deposit
to the refund reserve account discussed above) totalled $30.829 billion, an
increase of $45 million above projections in April 1992.
Fiscal year 1992-93 was the first time in four years that the State did not
incur a cash-basis operating deficit in the General Fund requiring the
issuance of deficit notes or other bonds, spending cuts or other revenue
raising measures.
Indebtedness. As of March 31, 1993, the total amount of long-term State
general obligation debt authorized but unissued stood at $2.4 billion. As of
the same date, the State had approximately $5.4 billion in general obligation
bonds. The State issued $850 million in tax and revenue anticipation notes
("TRANS") on April 28, 1993. The State does not project the need to
issue additional TRANS during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
The State projects that its borrowings for capital purposes during the State's
1993-94 fiscal year will consist of $460 million in general obligation bonds
and $140 million in new commercial paper issuances. In addition, the State
expects to issue $140 million in bonds for the purpose of redeeming
outstanding bond anticipation notes. The Legislature has authorized the
issuance of up to $85 million in certificates of participation during the
State's 1993-94 fiscal year for personal and real property acquisitions during
the State's 1993-94 fiscal year. The projection of the State regarding its
borrowings for the 1993-94 fiscal year may change if actual receipts fall
short of State projections or if other circumstances require.
In June 1990, legislation was enacted creating the "New York Local
Government Assistance Corporation"("LGAC"), a public benefit
corporation empowered to issue long-term obligations to fund certain payments
to local governments traditionally funded through the State's annual seasonal
borrowing. To date, LGAC has issued its bonds to provide net proceeds of $3.28
billion. LGAC has been authorized to issue additional bonds to provide net
proceeds of $703 million during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
Ratings. The $850 million in TRANS issued by the State in April 1993 were
rated SP-1-Plus by S&P on April 26, 1993, and MIG-1 by Moody's on April 23,
1993, which represents the highest ratings given by such agencies and the
first time the State's TRANS have received these ratings since its May 1989
TRANS issuance. Both agencies cited the State's improved fiscal position as a
significant factor in the upgrading of the April 1993 TRANS.
Moody's rating of the State's general obligation bonds stood at A on April 23,
1993, and S&P's rating stood at A- with a stable outlook on April 26, 1993, an
improvement from S&P's negative outlook prior to April 1993. Previously,
Moody's lowered its rating to A on June 6, 1990, its rating having been A1
since May 27, 1986. S&P lowered its rating from A to A- on January 13, 1992.
S&P's previous ratings were A from March 1990 to January 1992, AA- from August
1987 to March 1990 and A+ from November 1982 to August 1987.
Moody's, in confirming its rating of the State's general obligation bonds, and
S&P, in improving its outlook on such bonds from negative to stable, noted the
State's improved fiscal condition and reasonable revenue assumptions contained
in the 1993-94 State budget.
The City accounts for approximately 41% of the State's population and personal
income, and the City's financial health affects the State in numerous ways.
In response to the City's fiscal crisis in 1975, the State took a number of
steps to assist the City in returning to fiscal stability. Among other
actions, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term
financing for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii)
created the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to
review and approve the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the
financial plans also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "
Covered Organizations").
In February 1975, the New York State Urban Development Corporation ("
UDC"), which had approximately $1 billion of outstanding debt, defaulted
on certain of its short-term notes. Shortly after the UDC default, the City
entered a period of financial crisis. Both the State Legislature and the
United States Congress enacted legislation in response to this crisis. During
1975, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term financing
for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii) created
the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to review and
approve the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the financial
plans also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "Covered
Organizations")).
Over the past three years, the rate of economic growth in the City has slowed
substantially, and the City's economy is currently in recession. The City
projects, and its current four-year financial plan assumes, a recovery early
in the 1993 calendar year. The Mayor is responsible for preparing the City's
four-year financial plan, including the City's current financial plan. The
City Comptroller has issued reports concluding that the recession of the
City's economy will be more severe and last longer than is assumed in the
financial plan.
Fiscal Year 1993 and 1993-1996 Financial Plan. The City's 1993 fiscal year
results are projected to be balanced in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP"). The City was required to close
substantial budget gaps in its 1990, 1991 and 1992 fiscal years in order to
maintain balanced operating results.
The City's modified Financial Plan dated February 9, 1993 covering fiscal
years 1993-1996 projects budget gaps for 1994 through 1996. The Office of the
State Deputy Controller for the City of New York has estimated that under the
modified Financial Plan budget gaps will be $102 million for fiscal year 1994,
$196 million for fiscal year 1995 and $354 million for fiscal year 1996,
primarily due to anticipated higher spending on labor costs.
However, the City's modified Plan is dependent upon a gap-closing program,
certain elements of which the staff of Control Board identified on March 25,
1993 to be at risk due to projected levels of State and Federal aid and
revenue and expenditures estimates which may not be achievable. The Control
Board indicated that the City's modified Financial Plan does not make progress
towards establishing a balanced budget process. The Control Board's report
identified budget gap risks of $1.0 billion, $1.9 billion, $2.3 billion and
$2.6 billion in fiscal years 1994 through 1997, respectively.
On June 3, 1993, the Mayor announced that State and federal aid for Fiscal
Year 1993-1994 would be $280 million less than projected and that in order to
balance the City's budget $176 million of previously announced contingent
budget cuts would be imposed. The Mayor indicated that further savings would
entail serious reductions in services. The State Comptroller on June 14, 1993
criticized efforts by the Mayor and City Council to balance the City's budget
which rely primarily on one-shot revenues. The Comptroller added that the
City's budget should be based on "recurring revenues that fund recurring
expenditures."Given the foregoing factors, there can be no assurance that
the City will continue to maintain a balanced budget, or that it can maintain
a balanced budget without additional tax or other revenue increases or
reductions in City services, which could adversely affect the City's economic
base.
Pursuant to State law, the City prepares a four-year annual financial plan,
which is reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis and which includes the
City's capital, revenue and expense projections. The City is required to
submit its financial plans to review bodies, including the Control Board. If
the City were to experience certain adverse financial circumstances, including
the occurrence or the substantial likelihood and imminence of the occurrence
of an annual operating deficit of more than $100 million or the loss of access
to the public credit markets to satisfy the City's capital and seasonal
financial requirements, the Control Board would be required by State law to
exercise certain powers, including prior approval of City financial plans,
proposed borrowings and certain contracts.
The City depends on the State for State aid both to enable the City to balance
its budget and to meet its cash requirements. As a result of the national and
regional economic recession, the State's projections of tax revenues for its
1991 and 1992 fiscal years were substantially reduced. For its 1993 fiscal
year, the State, before taking any remedial action reflected in the State
budget enacted by the State Legislature on April 2, 1992 reported a potential
budget deficit of $4.8 billion. If the State experiences revenue shortfalls or
spending increases beyond its projections during its 1993 fiscal year or
subsequent years, such developments could also result in reductions in
projected State aid to the City. In addition, there can be no assurance that
State budgets in future fiscal years will be adopted by the April 1 statutory
deadline and that there will not be adverse effects on the City's cash flow
and additional City expenditures as a result of such delays.
The City's projections set forth in its financial plan are based on various
assumptions and contingencies which are uncertain and which may not
materialize. Changes in major assumptions could significantly affect the
City's ability to balance its budget as required by State law and to meet its
annual cash flow and financing requirements. Such assumptions and
contingencies include the timing of any regional and local economic recovery,
the absence of wage increases in excess of the increases assumed in its
financial plan, employment growth, provision of State and Federal aid and
mandate relief, State legislative approval of future State budgets, levels of
education expenditures as may be required by State law, adoption of future
City budgets by the New York City Council, and approval by the Governor or the
State Legislature and the cooperation of MAC with respect to various other
actions proposed in such financial plan.
The City's ability to maintain a balanced operating budget is dependent on
whether it can implement necessary service and personnel reduction programs
successfully. As discussed above, the City must identify additional
expenditure reductions and revenue sources to achieve balanced operating
budgets for fiscal years 1994 and thereafter. Any such proposed expenditure
reductions will be difficult to implement because of their size and the
substantial expenditure reductions already imposed on City operations in the
past two years.
Attaining a balanced budget is also dependent upon the City's ability to
market its securities successfully in the public credit markets. The City's
financing program for fiscal years 1993 through 1996 contemplates issuance of
$15.7 billion of general obligation bonds primarily to reconstruct and
rehabilitate the City's infrastructure and physical assets and to make capital
investments. A significant portion of such bond financing is used to reimburse
the City's general fund for capital expenditures already incurred. In
addition, the City issues revenue and tax anticipation notes to finance its
seasonal working capital requirements. The terms and success of projected
public sales of City general obligation bonds and notes will be subject to
prevailing market conditions at the time of the sale, and no assurance can be
given that the credit markets will absorb the projected amounts of public bond
and note sales. In addition, future developments concerning the City and
public discussion of such developments, the City's future financial needs and
other issues may affect the market for outstanding City general obligation
bonds and notes. If the City were unable to sell its general obligation bonds
and notes, it would be prevented from meeting its planned operating and
capital expenditures.
The City Comptroller, the staff of the Control Board, the Office of the State
Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York (the "OSDC") and other
agencies and public officials have issued reports and made public statements
which, among other things, state that projected revenues may be less and
future expenditures may be greater than those forecast in the financial plan.
In addition, the Control Board and other agencies have questioned whether the
City has the capacity to generate sufficient revenues in the future to meet
the costs of its expenditure increases and to provide necessary services. It
is reasonable to expect that such reports and statements will continue to be
issued and to engender public comment.
Fiscal Years 1990, 1991 and 1992. The City achieved balanced operating results
as reported in accordance with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year. During the 1990
and 1991 fiscal years, the City implemented various actions to offset a
projected budget deficit of $3.2 billion for the 1991 fiscal year, which
resulted from declines in City revenue sources and increased public assistance
needs due to the recession. Such actions included $822 million of tax
increases and substantial expenditure reductions.
The quarterly modification to the City's financial plan submitted to the
Control Board on May 7, 1992 (the "1992 Modification") projected a
balanced budget in accordance with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year after taking
into account a discretionary transfer of $455 million to the 1993 fiscal year
as the result of a 1992 fiscal year surplus. In order to achieve a balanced
budget for the 1992 fiscal year, during the 1991 fiscal year, the City
proposed various actions for the 1992 fiscal year to close a projected gap of
$3.3 billion in the 1992 fiscal year.
On November 19, 1992, the City submitted to the Control Board the Financial
Plan for the 1993 through 1996 fiscal years, which is a modification to a
financial plan submitted to the Control Board on June 11, 1992 (the "June
Financial Plan"), and which relates to the City, the Board of Education
("BOE") and the City University of New York ("CUNY"). The
1993-1996 Financial Plan projects revenues and expenditures of $29.9 billion
each for the 1993 fiscal year balanced in accordance with GAAP.
During the 1992 fiscal year, the City proposed various actions to close a
previously projected gap of approximately $1.2 billion for the 1993 fiscal
year. The gap-closing actions for the 1993 fiscal year proposed during the
1992 fiscal year and outlined in the City's June Financial Plan included $489
million of discretionary transfers from the 1992 fiscal year. The 1993-1996
City Financial Plan includes additional gap-closing actions to offset an
additional potential $81 million budget gap.
The 1993-1996 Financial Plan also sets forth projections and outlines a
proposed gap-closing program for the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years to close
projected budget gaps of $1.7 billion, $2.0 billion and $2.6 billion,
respectively, in the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years. On February 9, 1993, the
City issued a modification to the 1993-1996 Financial Plan (the "February
Modification"). The February Modification projects budget gaps for fiscal
years 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $2.1 billion, $3.1 billion and $3.8 billion,
respectively.
Various actions proposed in the 1993-1996 Financial Plan are subject to
approval by the Governor and approval by the State Legislature, and the
proposed increase in Federal aid is subject to approval by Congress and the
President. The State Legislature has in the past failed to approve certain
proposals similar to those that the 1993-1996 Financial Plan assumes will be
approved by the State Legislature during the 1993 fiscal year. If these
actions cannot be implemented, the City will be required to take other actions
to decrease expenditures or increase revenues to maintain a balanced financial
plan.
On March 9, 1993, OSDC issued a report on the February Modification. The
report expressed concern that the budget gaps projected for fiscal years 1994
through 1996 are the largest the City has faced at this point in the financial
planning cycle in at least a decade, and concluded that the February
Modification represented a step backward in the City's efforts to bring
recurring revenues into line with recurring expenditures.
The City is a defendant in a significant number of lawsuits. Such litigation
includes, but is not limited to, actions commenced and claims asserted against
the City arising out of alleged constitutional violations, torts, breaches of
contracts, and other violations of law and condemnation proceedings. While the
ultimate outcome and fiscal impact, if any, on the proceedings and claims are
not currently predictable, adverse determinations in certain of them might
have a material adverse effect upon the City's ability to carry out its
financial plan. As of June 30, 1992, legal claims in excess of $341 billion
were outstanding against the City for which the City estimated its potential
future liability to be $2.3 billion.
As of the date of this prospectus, Moody's rating of the City's general
obligation bonds stood at Baa1 and S&P's rating stood at A-. On February 11,
1991, Moody's had lowered its rating from A.
On March 30, 1993, in confirming its Baa1 rating, Moody's noted that:
The financial plan for fiscal year 1994 and beyond shows an ongoing imbalance
between the City's expenditures and revenues. The key indication of this
structural imbalance is not necessarily the presence of sizable out-year
budget gaps, but the recurring use of one-shot actions to close gaps.
One-shots constitute a significant share of the proposed gap-closing program
for fiscal year 1994, and they represent an even larger share of those
measures which the City seems reasonably certain to attain. Several major
elements of the program, including certain state actions, federal counter
cyclical aid and part of the city's tax package, remain uncertain. However,
the gap closing plan may be substantially altered when the executive budget is
offered later this spring.
On March 30, 1993, S&P affirmed its A- rating with a negative outlook, stating
that:
The City's key credit factors are marked by a high and growing debt burden,
and taxation levels that are relatively high, but stable. The City's economy
is broad-based and diverse, but currently is in prolonged recession, with slow
growth prospects for the foreseeable future.
The rating outlook is negative, reflecting the continued fiscal pressure
facing the City, driven by continued weakness in the local economy, rising
spending pressures for education and labor costs of city employees, and
increasing costs associated with rising debt for capital construction and
repair.
The current financial plan for the City assumes substantial increases in aid
from national and state governments. Maintenance of the current rating, and
stabilization of the rating outlook, will depend on the City's success in
realizing budgetary aid from these governments, or replacing those revenues
with ongoing revenue-raising measures or spending reductions under the City's
control. However, increased reliance on non-recurring budget balancing
measures that would support current spending, but defer budgetary gaps to
future years, would be viewed by S&P as detrimental to New York City's
single-'A-' rating.
Previously, Moody's had raised its rating to A in May, 1988, to Baa1 in
December, 1985, to Baa in November, 1983 and to Ba1 in November, 1981. S&P had
raised its rating to A- in November, 1987, to BBB+ in July, 1985 and to BBB in
March, 1981.
On May 9, 1990, Moody's revised downward its rating on outstanding City
revenue anticipation notes from MIG-1 to MIG-2 and rated the $900 million
Notes then being sold MIG-2. On April 30, 1991 Moody's confirmed its MIG-2
rating for the outstanding revenue anticipation notes and for the $1.25
billion in notes then being sold. On April 29, 1991, S&P revised downward its
rating on City revenue anticipation notes from SP-1 to SP-2.
As of December 31, 1992, the City and MAC had, respectively, $20.3 billion and
$4.7 billion of outstanding net long-term indebtedness.
Certain Agencies of the State have faced substantial financial difficulties
which could adversely affect the ability of such Agencies to make payments of
interest on, and principal amounts of, their respective bonds. The
difficulties have in certain instances caused the State (under so-called "
moral obligation"provisions which are non-binding statutory provisions
for State appropriations to maintain various debt service reserve funds) to
appropriate funds on behalf of the Agencies. Moreover, it is expected that the
problems faced by these Agencies will continue and will require increasing
amounts of State assistance in future years. Failure of the State to
appropriate necessary amounts or to take other action to permit those Agencies
having financial difficulties to meet their obligations could result in a
default by one or more of the Agencies. Such default, if it were to occur,
would be likely to have a significant adverse effect on investor confidence
in, and therefore the market price of, obligations of the defaulting Agencies.
In addition, any default in payment on any general obligation of any Agency
whose bonds contain a moral obligation provision could constitute a failure of
certain conditions that must be satisfied in connection with Federal
guarantees of City and MAC obligations and could thus jeopardize the City's
long-term financing plans.
As of September 30, 1992, the State reported that there were eighteen Agencies
that each had outstanding debt of $100 million or more. These eighteen
Agencies had an aggregate of $62.2 billion of outstanding debt, including
refunding bonds, of which the State was obligated under lease-purchase,
contractual obligation or moral obligation provisions on $25.3 billion.
The State is a defendant in numerous legal proceedings pertaining to matters
incidental to the performance of routine governmental operations. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, claims asserted against the State
arising from alleged torts, alleged breaches of contracts, condemnation
proceedings and other alleged violations of State and Federal laws. Included
in the State's outstanding litigation are a number of cases challenging the
constitutionality or the adequacy and effectiveness of a variety of
significant social welfare programs primarily involving the State's mental
hygiene programs. Adverse judgments in these matters generally could result in
injunctive relief coupled with prospective changes in patient care which could
require substantial increased financing of the litigated programs in the
future.
The State is also engaged in a variety of claims wherein significant monetary
damages are sought. Actions commenced by several Indian nations claim that
significant amounts of land were unconstitutionally taken from the Indians in
violation of various treaties and agreements during the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries. The claimants seek recovery of approximately six million
acres of land as well as compensatory and punitive damages.
The U.S. Supreme Court on March 30, 1993 referred to a Special Master for
determination of damages in an action by the State of Delaware to recover
certain unclaimed dividends, interest and other distributions made by issuers
of securities held by New York based-brokers incorporated in Delaware. (State
of Delaware v. State of New York.) The State had taken such unclaimed property
under its Abandoned Property Law. The State expects that it may pay a
significant amount in damages during fiscal year 1993-94 but it has indicated
that it has sufficient funds on hand to pay any such award, including funds
held in contingency reserves. The State's 1993-94 Financial Plan includes the
establishment of a $100 million contingency reserve fund which would be
available to fund such an award which some reports have estimated at $100-$800
million.
In Schulz v. State of New York, commenced May 24, 1993 ("Schulz 1993"
), petitioners have challenged the constitutionality of mass transportation
bonding programs of the New York State Thruway Authority and the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority. On May 24, 1993, the Supreme Court, Albany County,
temporarily enjoined the State from implementing those bonding programs. In
previous actions Mr. Schulz and others have challenged on similar grounds
bonding programs for the New York State Urban Development Corporation and the
New York Local Government Assistance Corporation. While there have been no
decisions on the merits in such previous actions, by an opinion dated May 11,
1993, the New York Court of Appeals held in a proceeding commenced on April
29, 1991 in the Supreme Court, Albany County (Schulz v. State of New York),
that petitioners had standing as voters under the State Constitution to bring
such action.
Petitioners in Schulz 1993 have asserted that issuance of bonds by the two
Authorities is subject to approval by statewide referendum. At this time there
can be no forecast of the likelihood of success on the merits by the
petitioners, but a decision upholding this constitutional challenge could
restrict and limit the ability of the State and its instrumentalities to
borrow funds in the future. The State has not indicated that the temporary
injunction issued by the Supreme Court in this action will have any immediate
impact on its financial condition or interfere with projects requiring
immediate action.
Adverse developments in the foregoing proceedings or new proceedings could
adversely affect the financial condition of the State in the future.
Certain localities in addition to New York City could have financial problems
leading to requests for additional State assistance. Both the Revised
1992-1993 State Financial Plan and the recommended 1993-94 State Financial
Plan includes a significant reduction in State aid to localities in such
programs as revenue sharing and aid to education from projected base-line
growth in such programs. It is expected that such reductions will result in
the need for localities to reduce their spending or increase their revenues.
The potential impact on the State of such actions by localities is not
included in projections of State receipts and expenditures in the State's
1993-94 fiscal year.
Fiscal difficulties experienced by the City of Yonkers ("Yonkers")
resulted in the creation of the Financial Control Board for the City of
Yonkers (the "Yonkers Board") by the State in 1984. The Yonkers Board
is charged with oversight of the fiscal affairs of Yonkers. Future actions
taken by the Governor or the State Legislature to assist Yonkers could result
in allocation of State resources in amounts that cannot yet be determined.
Municipalities and school districts have engaged in substantial short-term and
long-term borrowings. In 1991, the total indebtedness of all localities in the
State was approximately $31.6 billion, of which $16.8 billion was debt of New
York City (excluding $6.7 billion in MAC debt). State law requires the
Comptroller to review and make recommendations concerning the budgets of those
local government units other than New York City authorized by State law to
issue debt to finance deficits during the period that such deficit financing
is outstanding. Fifteen localities had outstanding indebtedness for state
financing at the close of their fiscal year ending in 1991. In 1992, an
unusually large number of local government units requested authorization for
deficit financings. According to the Comptroller, ten local government units
have been authorized to issue deficit financing in the aggregate amount of
$131.1 million.
Certain proposed Federal expenditure reductions could reduce, or in some cases
eliminate, Federal funding of some local programs and accordingly might impose
substantial increased expenditure requirements on affected localities. If the
State, New York City or any of the Agencies were to suffer serious financial
difficulties jeopardizing their respective access to the public credit
markets, the marketability of notes and bonds issued by localities within the
State, including notes or bonds in the New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered
Maturity Trust, could be adversely affected. Localities also face anticipated
and potential problems resulting from certain pending litigation, judicial
decisions, and long-range economic trends. The longer-range potential problems
of declining urban population, increasing expenditures, and other economic
trends could adversely affect localities and require increasing State
assistance in the future.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on New
York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust Units, see "Other
Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Tanner Propp & Farber, special counsel to the Fund for New
York tax matters, under existing New York law:
The New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust is not an association
taxable as a corporation and the income of the New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust will be treated as the income of the Unitholders under
the income tax laws of the State and City of New York. Individuals who reside
in New York State or City will not be subject to State and City tax on
interest income which is exempt from Federal income tax under section 103 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and derived from obligations of New York
State or a political subdivision thereof, although they will be subject to New
York State and City tax with respect to any gains realized when such
obligations are sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when any such Units are
sold or redeemed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per Unit Information:
<S> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit.................................... $ 49.08
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>................................. $ 2.08
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit......................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 47.00
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings Per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 47.00
Divided by 12................................................................ $ 3.92
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit......................... $ .13056
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F2><F3><F4>.......... 4.65%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F2><F3><F4>....................................... 5.12%
Initial Distribution (December 1994).......................................... $ 3.66
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F4>................................... $ 3.92
Purchased Interest <F5>....................................................... $ 8.18
Trustee's Annual Fee...............$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Record and Computation Dates.......FIRST day of each month
Distribution Dates ................FIFTEENTH day of each month commencing
December 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1>Excluding insurance costs.
<F2>The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased for
transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3>The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated
net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no
assurance that the present Estimated Current Return indicated above will be
realized in the future. The Estimated Long-Term Return is calculated using a
formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the
relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account
the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated
retirements of all of the Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account
the expenses and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the
market values and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of
the Trust will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Long-Term Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated Current
Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and Public
Offering Price.
<F4>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders".
<F5>See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
NEW YORK INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY
SERIES 13 (168TH INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
New York
IM-IT
Intermediate
Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate and Laddered
Aggregate Maturity Date of either Bonds Deposited or Redemption Maturity
Principal<F1> Bonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 600,000 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Transportation
Facilities Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series N (MBIA Insured)
#4.00% Due 7/1/1999 .............................................. AAA $ 564,474
300,000 Riverhead, New York, Public Improvement Limited Tax Refunding
General Obligation Bonds, Series 1993 (FGIC Insured)
#4.50% Due 3/1/2000 .............................................. AAA 287,217
200,000 Babylon, New York, Waste Facilities Authority, Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation Bonds (FGIC Insured)
#4.10% Due 8/1/2000 .............................................. AAA 184,962
250,000 Oceanside, New York, Unified Free School District, Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation Bonds, Series 1994 (MBIA Insured) YAAA
100M-5.65% Due 11/1/2000 102,153
150M-5.65% Due 11/1/2003 ......................................... YAAA 150,563
100,000 Albany, New York, Unlimited Tax-General Obligation Refunding
Bonds, Series 1993 (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
#4.55% Due 1/15/2001 ............................................. AAA 94,384
250,000 Niagara Falls, New York, Bridge Commission Toll Revenue Bonds,
Refunding Series B (FGIC Insured)
#4.60% Due 10/1/2001 ............................................. AAA 235,472
250,000 Albany, New York, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and
Sewer System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series A (FGIC
Insured)
#4.85% Due 12/1/2001 ............................................. AAA 240,483
600,000 New York City, New York, Refunding General Obligation Bonds,
Series A (MBIA Insured)
#5.75% Due 8/1/2002 .............................................. AAA 607,782
250,000 New York State Thruway Authority, Highway and Bridge Trust
Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 1994B (FGIC Insured)
#5.40% Due 4/1/2003 .............................................. AAA 246,782
200,000 Suffolk County, New York, Public Improvement Unlimited
Tax-General Obligation Bonds (AMBAC Indemnity Insured)
5.625% Due 4/1/2003 .............................................. AAA 200,406
$ 3,000,000 $ 2,914,678
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
NEW YORK IM-IT TRUST
General. The New York IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities. One of
the Bonds in the New York IM-IT Trust is a general obligation of the
governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing power thereof. The
remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total New York IM-IT Trust) as follows: Higher Education, 2 (32%);
Transportation, 2 (19%); Health Care, 1 (16%); Industrial Revenue, 1 (16%);
General Obligations, 1 (14%) and Other Care, 1 (3%). No Bond issue has
received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. A resident of New York State (or New York City) will be subject
to New York State (or New York City) personal income tax with respect to gains
realized when New York Obligations held in the New York Insured Trust are
sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when his Units are sold or redeemed,
such gain will equal the proceeds of sale, redemption or payment less the tax
basis of the New York Obligation or Unit (adjusted to reflect (a) the
amortization of premium or discount, if any, on New York Obligations held in
the Trust, (b) accrued original issue discount, with respect to each New York
Obligation which, at the time the New York Obligation was issued had original
issue discount, and (c) the deposit of New York Obligations with accrued
interest in the Trust after the Unitholder's settlement date).
Interest or gain from the New York Insured Trust derived by a Unitholder who
is not a resident of New York State (or New York City) will not be subject to
New York State (or New York City) personal income tax, unless the Units are
property employed in a business, trade, profession or occupation carried on in
New York State (or New York City).
Amounts paid on defaulted New York Obligations held by the Trustee under
policies of insurance issued with respect to such New York Obligations will be
excludable from income for New York State and New York City income tax
purposes, if and to the same extent as, such interest would have been
excludable if paid by the respective issuer.
For purposes of the New York State and New York City franchise tax on
corporations, Unitholders which are subject to such tax will be required to
include in their entire net income any interest or gains distributed to them
even though distributed in respect of New York obligations.
If borrowed funds are used to purchase Units in the Trust, all (or part) of
the interest on such indebtedness will not be deductible for New York State
and New York City tax purposes. The purchase of Units may be considered to
have been made with borrowed funds even though such funds are not directly
traceable to the purchase of Units in any New York Trust.
The Portfolio of the New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust
includes obligations issued by New York State (the "State"), by its
various public bodies (the "Agencies"), and/or by other entities
located within the State, including the City of New York (the "City").
Some of the more significant events relating to the financial situation in New
York are summarized below. This section provides only a brief summary of the
complex factors affecting the financial situation in New York and is based in
part on Official Statements issued by, and on other information reported by
the State, the City and the Agencies in connection with the issuance of their
respective securities.
There can be no assurance that future statewide or regional economic
difficulties, and the resulting impact on State or local government finances
generally, will not adversely affect the market value of New York Municipal
Obligations held in the portfolio of the Trust or the ability of particular
obligors to make timely payments of debt service on (or relating to) those
obligations.
The State has historically been one of the wealthiest states in the nation.
For decades, however, the State economy has grown more slowly than that of the
nation as a whole, gradually eroding the State's relative economic affluence.
Statewide, urban centers have experienced significant changes involving
migration of the more affluent to the suburbs and an influx of generally less
affluent residents. Regionally, the older Northeast cities have suffered
because of the relative success that the South and the West have had in
attracting people and business. The City has also had to face greater
competition as other major cities have developed financial and business
capabilities which make them less dependent on the specialized services
traditionally available almost exclusively in the City.
The State has for many years had a very high state and local tax burden
relative to other states. The burden of State and local taxation, in
combination with the many other causes of regional economic dislocation, has
contributed to the decisions of some businesses and individuals to relocate
outside, or not locate within, the State.
A national recession commenced in mid-1990. The downturn continued throughout
the State's 1990-91 fiscal year and was followed by a period of weak economic
growth during the 1991 calendar year. For calendar year 1992, the national
economy continued to recover, although at a rate below all post-war
recoveries. For calendar year 1993, the economy is expected to grow faster
than 1992, but still at a very moderate rate, as compared to other recoveries.
The national recession has been more severe in the State because of factors
such as a significant retrenchment in the financial services industry,
cutbacks in defense spending, and an overbuilt real estate market.
1993-94 Fiscal Year. On April 5, 1993, the State Legislature approved a $32.08
billion budget. Following enactment of the budget the 1993-94 State Financial
Plan was formulated on April 16, 1993. This Plan projects General Fund
receipts and transfers from other funds at $32.367 billion and disbursements
and transfers to other funds at $32.300 billion. In comparison to the
Governor's recommended Executive Budget for the 1993-94 fiscal year, as
revised on February 18, 1993, the 1993-94 State Financial Plan reflects
increases in both receipts and disbursements in the General Fund of $811
million.
While a portion of the increased receipts was the result of a $487 million
increase in the State's 1992-93 positive year-end margin at March 31, 1993 to
$671 million, the balance of such increased receipts is based upon (i) a
projected $269 million increase in receipts resulting from improved 1992-93
results and the expectation of an improving economy, (ii) projected additional
payments of $200 million from the Federal government as reimbursements for
indigent medical care, (iii) the early payment of $50 million of personal tax
returns in 1992-93 which otherwise would have been paid in 1993-94; offset by
(iv) the State Legislature's failure to enact $195 million of additional
revenue-raising recommendations proposed by the Governor. There can be no
assurances that all of the projected receipts referred to above will be
received.
Despite the $811 million increase in disbursements included in the 1993-94
State Financial Plan, a reduction in aid to some local government units can be
expected. To offset a portion of such reductions, the 1993-94 State Financial
Plan contains a package of mandate relief, cost containment and other
proposals to reduce the costs of many programs for which local governments
provide funding. There can be no assurance, however, that localities that
suffer cuts will not be adversely affected, leading to further requests for
State financial assistance.
There can be no assurance that the State will not face substantial potential
budget gaps in the future resulting from a significant disparity between tax
revenues projected from a lower recurring receipts base and the spending
required to maintain State programs at current levels. To address any
potential budgetary imbalance, the State may need to take significant actions
to align recurring receipts and disbursements.
1992-93 Fiscal Year. Before giving effect to a 1992-93 year-end deposit to the
refund reserve account of $671 million, General Fund receipts in 1992-93 would
have been $716 million higher than originally projected. This year-end deposit
effectively reduced 1992-93 receipts by $671 million and made those receipts
available for 1993-94.
The State's favorable performance primarily resulted from income tax
collections that were $700 million higher than projected which reflected both
stronger economic activity and tax-induced one-time acceleration of income
into 1992. In other areas larger than projected business tax collections and
unbudgeted receipts offset the loss of $200 million of anticipated Federal
reimbursement and losses of, or shortfalls in, other projected revenue
sources.
For 1992-93, disbursements and transfers to other funds (including the deposit
to the refund reserve account discussed above) totalled $30.829 billion, an
increase of $45 million above projections in April 1992.
Fiscal year 1992-93 was the first time in four years that the State did not
incur a cash-basis operating deficit in the General Fund requiring the
issuance of deficit notes or other bonds, spending cuts or other revenue
raising measures.
Indebtedness. As of March 31, 1993, the total amount of long-term State
general obligation debt authorized but unissued stood at $2.4 billion. As of
the same date, the State had approximately $5.4 billion in general obligation
bonds. The State issued $850 million in tax and revenue anticipation notes
("TRANS") on April 28, 1993. The State does not project the need to
issue additional TRANS during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
The State projects that its borrowings for capital purposes during the State's
1993-94 fiscal year will consist of $460 million in general obligation bonds
and $140 million in new commercial paper issuances. In addition, the State
expects to issue $140 million in bonds for the purpose of redeeming
outstanding bond anticipation notes. The Legislature has authorized the
issuance of up to $85 million in certificates of participation during the
State's 1993-94 fiscal year for personal and real property acquisitions during
the State's 1993-94 fiscal year. The projection of the State regarding its
borrowings for the 1993-94 fiscal year may change if actual receipts fall
short of State projections or if other circumstances require.
In June 1990, legislation was enacted creating the "New York Local
Government Assistance Corporation"("LGAC"), a public benefit
corporation empowered to issue long-term obligations to fund certain payments
to local governments traditionally funded through the State's annual seasonal
borrowing. To date, LGAC has issued its bonds to provide net proceeds of $3.28
billion. LGAC has been authorized to issue additional bonds to provide net
proceeds of $703 million during the State's 1993-94 fiscal year.
Ratings. The $850 million in TRANS issued by the State in April 1993 were
rated SP-1-Plus by S&P on April 26, 1993, and MIG-1 by Moody's on April 23,
1993, which represents the highest ratings given by such agencies and the
first time the State's TRANS have received these ratings since its May 1989
TRANS issuance. Both agencies cited the State's improved fiscal position as a
significant factor in the upgrading of the April 1993 TRANS.
Moody's rating of the State's general obligation bonds stood at A on April 23,
1993, and S&P's rating stood at A- with a stable outlook on April 26, 1993, an
improvement from S&P's negative outlook prior to April 1993. Previously,
Moody's lowered its rating to A on June 6, 1990, its rating having been A1
since May 27, 1986. S&P lowered its rating from A to A- on January 13, 1992.
S&P's previous ratings were A from March 1990 to January 1992, AA- from August
1987 to March 1990 and A+ from November 1982 to August 1987.
Moody's, in confirming its rating of the State's general obligation bonds, and
S&P, in improving its outlook on such bonds from negative to stable, noted the
State's improved fiscal condition and reasonable revenue assumptions contained
in the 1993-94 State budget.
The City accounts for approximately 41% of the State's population and personal
income, and the City's financial health affects the State in numerous ways.
In response to the City's fiscal crisis in 1975, the State took a number of
steps to assist the City in returning to fiscal stability. Among other
actions, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term
financing for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii)
created the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to
review and approve the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the
financial plans also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "
Covered Organizations").
In February 1975, the New York State Urban Development Corporation ("
UDC"), which had approximately $1 billion of outstanding debt, defaulted
on certain of its short-term notes. Shortly after the UDC default, the City
entered a period of financial crisis. Both the State Legislature and the
United States Congress enacted legislation in response to this crisis. During
1975, the State Legislature (i) created MAC to assist with long-term financing
for the City's short-term debt and other cash requirements and (ii) created
the State Financial Control Board (the "Control Board") to review and
approve the City's budgets and City four-year financial plans (the financial
plans also apply to certain City-related public agencies (the "Covered
Organizations")).
Over the past three years, the rate of economic growth in the City has slowed
substantially, and the City's economy is currently in recession. The City
projects, and its current four-year financial plan assumes, a recovery early
in the 1993 calendar year. The Mayor is responsible for preparing the City's
four-year financial plan, including the City's current financial plan. The
City Comptroller has issued reports concluding that the recession of the
City's economy will be more severe and last longer than is assumed in the
financial plan.
Fiscal Year 1993 and 1993-1996 Financial Plan. The City's 1993 fiscal year
results are projected to be balanced in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP"). The City was required to close
substantial budget gaps in its 1990, 1991 and 1992 fiscal years in order to
maintain balanced operating results.
The City's modified Financial Plan dated February 9, 1993 covering fiscal
years 1993-1996 projects budget gaps for 1994 through 1996. The Office of the
State Deputy Controller for the City of New York has estimated that under the
modified Financial Plan budget gaps will be $102 million for fiscal year 1994,
$196 million for fiscal year 1995 and $354 million for fiscal year 1996,
primarily due to anticipated higher spending on labor costs.
However, the City's modified Plan is dependent upon a gap-closing program,
certain elements of which the staff of Control Board identified on March 25,
1993 to be at risk due to projected levels of State and Federal aid and
revenue and expenditures estimates which may not be achievable. The Control
Board indicated that the City's modified Financial Plan does not make progress
towards establishing a balanced budget process. The Control Board's report
identified budget gap risks of $1.0 billion, $1.9 billion, $2.3 billion and
$2.6 billion in fiscal years 1994 through 1997, respectively.
On June 3, 1993, the Mayor announced that State and federal aid for Fiscal
Year 1993-1994 would be $280 million less than projected and that in order to
balance the City's budget $176 million of previously announced contingent
budget cuts would be imposed. The Mayor indicated that further savings would
entail serious reductions in services. The State Comptroller on June 14, 1993
criticized efforts by the Mayor and City Council to balance the City's budget
which rely primarily on one-shot revenues. The Comptroller added that the
City's budget should be based on "recurring revenues that fund recurring
expenditures."Given the foregoing factors, there can be no assurance that
the City will continue to maintain a balanced budget, or that it can maintain
a balanced budget without additional tax or other revenue increases or
reductions in City services, which could adversely affect the City's economic
base.
Pursuant to State law, the City prepares a four-year annual financial plan,
which is reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis and which includes the
City's capital, revenue and expense projections. The City is required to
submit its financial plans to review bodies, including the Control Board. If
the City were to experience certain adverse financial circumstances, including
the occurrence or the substantial likelihood and imminence of the occurrence
of an annual operating deficit of more than $100 million or the loss of access
to the public credit markets to satisfy the City's capital and seasonal
financial requirements, the Control Board would be required by State law to
exercise certain powers, including prior approval of City financial plans,
proposed borrowings and certain contracts.
The City depends on the State for State aid both to enable the City to balance
its budget and to meet its cash requirements. As a result of the national and
regional economic recession, the State's projections of tax revenues for its
1991 and 1992 fiscal years were substantially reduced. For its 1993 fiscal
year, the State, before taking any remedial action reflected in the State
budget enacted by the State Legislature on April 2, 1992 reported a potential
budget deficit of $4.8 billion. If the State experiences revenue shortfalls or
spending increases beyond its projections during its 1993 fiscal year or
subsequent years, such developments could also result in reductions in
projected State aid to the City. In addition, there can be no assurance that
State budgets in future fiscal years will be adopted by the April 1 statutory
deadline and that there will not be adverse effects on the City's cash flow
and additional City expenditures as a result of such delays.
The City's projections set forth in its financial plan are based on various
assumptions and contingencies which are uncertain and which may not
materialize. Changes in major assumptions could significantly affect the
City's ability to balance its budget as required by State law and to meet its
annual cash flow and financing requirements. Such assumptions and
contingencies include the timing of any regional and local economic recovery,
the absence of wage increases in excess of the increases assumed in its
financial plan, employment growth, provision of State and Federal aid and
mandate relief, State legislative approval of future State budgets, levels of
education expenditures as may be required by State law, adoption of future
City budgets by the New York City Council, and approval by the Governor or the
State Legislature and the cooperation of MAC with respect to various other
actions proposed in such financial plan.
The City's ability to maintain a balanced operating budget is dependent on
whether it can implement necessary service and personnel reduction programs
successfully. As discussed above, the City must identify additional
expenditure reductions and revenue sources to achieve balanced operating
budgets for fiscal years 1994 and thereafter. Any such proposed expenditure
reductions will be difficult to implement because of their size and the
substantial expenditure reductions already imposed on City operations in the
past two years.
Attaining a balanced budget is also dependent upon the City's ability to
market its securities successfully in the public credit markets. The City's
financing program for fiscal years 1993 through 1996 contemplates issuance of
$15.7 billion of general obligation bonds primarily to reconstruct and
rehabilitate the City's infrastructure and physical assets and to make capital
investments. A significant portion of such bond financing is used to reimburse
the City's general fund for capital expenditures already incurred. In
addition, the City issues revenue and tax anticipation notes to finance its
seasonal working capital requirements. The terms and success of projected
public sales of City general obligation bonds and notes will be subject to
prevailing market conditions at the time of the sale, and no assurance can be
given that the credit markets will absorb the projected amounts of public bond
and note sales. In addition, future developments concerning the City and
public discussion of such developments, the City's future financial needs and
other issues may affect the market for outstanding City general obligation
bonds and notes. If the City were unable to sell its general obligation bonds
and notes, it would be prevented from meeting its planned operating and
capital expenditures.
The City Comptroller, the staff of the Control Board, the Office of the State
Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York (the "OSDC") and other
agencies and public officials have issued reports and made public statements
which, among other things, state that projected revenues may be less and
future expenditures may be greater than those forecast in the financial plan.
In addition, the Control Board and other agencies have questioned whether the
City has the capacity to generate sufficient revenues in the future to meet
the costs of its expenditure increases and to provide necessary services. It
is reasonable to expect that such reports and statements will continue to be
issued and to engender public comment.
Fiscal Years 1990, 1991 and 1992. The City achieved balanced operating results
as reported in accordance with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year. During the 1990
and 1991 fiscal years, the City implemented various actions to offset a
projected budget deficit of $3.2 billion for the 1991 fiscal year, which
resulted from declines in City revenue sources and increased public assistance
needs due to the recession. Such actions included $822 million of tax
increases and substantial expenditure reductions.
The quarterly modification to the City's financial plan submitted to the
Control Board on May 7, 1992 (the "1992 Modification") projected a
balanced budget in accordance with GAAP for the 1992 fiscal year after taking
into account a discretionary transfer of $455 million to the 1993 fiscal year
as the result of a 1992 fiscal year surplus. In order to achieve a balanced
budget for the 1992 fiscal year, during the 1991 fiscal year, the City
proposed various actions for the 1992 fiscal year to close a projected gap of
$3.3 billion in the 1992 fiscal year.
On November 19, 1992, the City submitted to the Control Board the Financial
Plan for the 1993 through 1996 fiscal years, which is a modification to a
financial plan submitted to the Control Board on June 11, 1992 (the "June
Financial Plan"), and which relates to the City, the Board of Education
("BOE") and the City University of New York ("CUNY"). The
1993-1996 Financial Plan projects revenues and expenditures of $29.9 billion
each for the 1993 fiscal year balanced in accordance with GAAP.
During the 1992 fiscal year, the City proposed various actions to close a
previously projected gap of approximately $1.2 billion for the 1993 fiscal
year. The gap-closing actions for the 1993 fiscal year proposed during the
1992 fiscal year and outlined in the City's June Financial Plan included $489
million of discretionary transfers from the 1992 fiscal year. The 1993-1996
City Financial Plan includes additional gap-closing actions to offset an
additional potential $81 million budget gap.
The 1993-1996 Financial Plan also sets forth projections and outlines a
proposed gap-closing program for the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years to close
projected budget gaps of $1.7 billion, $2.0 billion and $2.6 billion,
respectively, in the 1994 through 1996 fiscal years. On February 9, 1993, the
City issued a modification to the 1993-1996 Financial Plan (the "February
Modification"). The February Modification projects budget gaps for fiscal
years 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $2.1 billion, $3.1 billion and $3.8 billion,
respectively.
Various actions proposed in the 1993-1996 Financial Plan are subject to
approval by the Governor and approval by the State Legislature, and the
proposed increase in Federal aid is subject to approval by Congress and the
President. The State Legislature has in the past failed to approve certain
proposals similar to those that the 1993-1996 Financial Plan assumes will be
approved by the State Legislature during the 1993 fiscal year. If these
actions cannot be implemented, the City will be required to take other actions
to decrease expenditures or increase revenues to maintain a balanced financial
plan.
On March 9, 1993, OSDC issued a report on the February Modification. The
report expressed concern that the budget gaps projected for fiscal years 1994
through 1996 are the largest the City has faced at this point in the financial
planning cycle in at least a decade, and concluded that the February
Modification represented a step backward in the City's efforts to bring
recurring revenues into line with recurring expenditures.
The City is a defendant in a significant number of lawsuits. Such litigation
includes, but is not limited to, actions commenced and claims asserted against
the City arising out of alleged constitutional violations, torts, breaches of
contracts, and other violations of law and condemnation proceedings. While the
ultimate outcome and fiscal impact, if any, on the proceedings and claims are
not currently predictable, adverse determinations in certain of them might
have a material adverse effect upon the City's ability to carry out its
financial plan. As of June 30, 1992, legal claims in excess of $341 billion
were outstanding against the City for which the City estimated its potential
future liability to be $2.3 billion.
As of the date of this prospectus, Moody's rating of the City's general
obligation bonds stood at Baa1 and S&P's rating stood at A-. On February 11,
1991, Moody's had lowered its rating from A.
On March 30, 1993, in confirming its Baa1 rating, Moody's noted that:
The financial plan for fiscal year 1994 and beyond shows an ongoing imbalance
between the City's expenditures and revenues. The key indication of this
structural imbalance is not necessarily the presence of sizable out-year
budget gaps, but the recurring use of one-shot actions to close gaps.
One-shots constitute a significant share of the proposed gap-closing program
for fiscal year 1994, and they represent an even larger share of those
measures which the City seems reasonably certain to attain. Several major
elements of the program, including certain state actions, federal counter
cyclical aid and part of the city's tax package, remain uncertain. However,
the gap closing plan may be substantially altered when the executive budget is
offered later this spring.
On March 30, 1993, S&P affirmed its A- rating with a negative outlook, stating
that:
The City's key credit factors are marked by a high and growing debt burden,
and taxation levels that are relatively high, but stable. The City's economy
is broad-based and diverse, but currently is in prolonged recession, with slow
growth prospects for the foreseeable future.
The rating outlook is negative, reflecting the continued fiscal pressure
facing the City, driven by continued weakness in the local economy, rising
spending pressures for education and labor costs of city employees, and
increasing costs associated with rising debt for capital construction and
repair.
The current financial plan for the City assumes substantial increases in aid
from national and state governments. Maintenance of the current rating, and
stabilization of the rating outlook, will depend on the City's success in
realizing budgetary aid from these governments, or replacing those revenues
with ongoing revenue-raising measures or spending reductions under the City's
control. However, increased reliance on non-recurring budget balancing
measures that would support current spending, but defer budgetary gaps to
future years, would be viewed by S&P as detrimental to New York City's
single-'A-' rating.
Previously, Moody's had raised its rating to A in May, 1988, to Baa1 in
December, 1985, to Baa in November, 1983 and to Ba1 in November, 1981. S&P had
raised its rating to A- in November, 1987, to BBB+ in July, 1985 and to BBB in
March, 1981.
On May 9, 1990, Moody's revised downward its rating on outstanding City
revenue anticipation notes from MIG-1 to MIG-2 and rated the $900 million
Notes then being sold MIG-2. On April 30, 1991 Moody's confirmed its MIG-2
rating for the outstanding revenue anticipation notes and for the $1.25
billion in notes then being sold. On April 29, 1991, S&P revised downward its
rating on City revenue anticipation notes from SP-1 to SP-2.
As of December 31, 1992, the City and MAC had, respectively, $20.3 billion and
$4.7 billion of outstanding net long-term indebtedness.
Certain Agencies of the State have faced substantial financial difficulties
which could adversely affect the ability of such Agencies to make payments of
interest on, and principal amounts of, their respective bonds. The
difficulties have in certain instances caused the State (under so-called "
moral obligation"provisions which are non-binding statutory provisions
for State appropriations to maintain various debt service reserve funds) to
appropriate funds on behalf of the Agencies. Moreover, it is expected that the
problems faced by these Agencies will continue and will require increasing
amounts of State assistance in future years. Failure of the State to
appropriate necessary amounts or to take other action to permit those Agencies
having financial difficulties to meet their obligations could result in a
default by one or more of the Agencies. Such default, if it were to occur,
would be likely to have a significant adverse effect on investor confidence
in, and therefore the market price of, obligations of the defaulting Agencies.
In addition, any default in payment on any general obligation of any Agency
whose bonds contain a moral obligation provision could constitute a failure of
certain conditions that must be satisfied in connection with Federal
guarantees of City and MAC obligations and could thus jeopardize the City's
long-term financing plans.
As of September 30, 1992, the State reported that there were eighteen Agencies
that each had outstanding debt of $100 million or more. These eighteen
Agencies had an aggregate of $62.2 billion of outstanding debt, including
refunding bonds, of which the State was obligated under lease-purchase,
contractual obligation or moral obligation provisions on $25.3 billion.
The State is a defendant in numerous legal proceedings pertaining to matters
incidental to the performance of routine governmental operations. Such
litigation includes, but is not limited to, claims asserted against the State
arising from alleged torts, alleged breaches of contracts, condemnation
proceedings and other alleged violations of State and Federal laws. Included
in the State's outstanding litigation are a number of cases challenging the
constitutionality or the adequacy and effectiveness of a variety of
significant social welfare programs primarily involving the State's mental
hygiene programs. Adverse judgments in these matters generally could result in
injunctive relief coupled with prospective changes in patient care which could
require substantial increased financing of the litigated programs in the
future.
The State is also engaged in a variety of claims wherein significant monetary
damages are sought. Actions commenced by several Indian nations claim that
significant amounts of land were unconstitutionally taken from the Indians in
violation of various treaties and agreements during the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries. The claimants seek recovery of approximately six million
acres of land as well as compensatory and punitive damages.
The U.S. Supreme Court on March 30, 1993 referred to a Special Master for
determination of damages in an action by the State of Delaware to recover
certain unclaimed dividends, interest and other distributions made by issuers
of securities held by New York based-brokers incorporated in Delaware. (State
of Delaware v. State of New York.) The State had taken such unclaimed property
under its Abandoned Property Law. The State expects that it may pay a
significant amount in damages during fiscal year 1993-94 but it has indicated
that it has sufficient funds on hand to pay any such award, including funds
held in contingency reserves. The State's 1993-94 Financial Plan includes the
establishment of a $100 million contingency reserve fund which would be
available to fund such an award which some reports have estimated at $100-$800
million.
In Schulz v. State of New York, commenced May 24, 1993 ("Schulz 1993"
), petitioners have challenged the constitutionality of mass transportation
bonding programs of the New York State Thruway Authority and the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority. On May 24, 1993, the Supreme Court, Albany County,
temporarily enjoined the State from implementing those bonding programs. In
previous actions Mr. Schulz and others have challenged on similar grounds
bonding programs for the New York State Urban Development Corporation and the
New York Local Government Assistance Corporation. While there have been no
decisions on the merits in such previous actions, by an opinion dated May 11,
1993, the New York Court of Appeals held in a proceeding commenced on April
29, 1991 in the Supreme Court, Albany County (Schulz v. State of New York),
that petitioners had standing as voters under the State Constitution to bring
such action.
Petitioners in Schulz 1993 have asserted that issuance of bonds by the two
Authorities is subject to approval by statewide referendum. At this time there
can be no forecast of the likelihood of success on the merits by the
petitioners, but a decision upholding this constitutional challenge could
restrict and limit the ability of the State and its instrumentalities to
borrow funds in the future. The State has not indicated that the temporary
injunction issued by the Supreme Court in this action will have any immediate
impact on its financial condition or interfere with projects requiring
immediate action.
Adverse developments in the foregoing proceedings or new proceedings could
adversely affect the financial condition of the State in the future.
Certain localities in addition to New York City could have financial problems
leading to requests for additional State assistance. Both the Revised
1992-1993 State Financial Plan and the recommended 1993-94 State Financial
Plan includes a significant reduction in State aid to localities in such
programs as revenue sharing and aid to education from projected base-line
growth in such programs. It is expected that such reductions will result in
the need for localities to reduce their spending or increase their revenues.
The potential impact on the State of such actions by localities is not
included in projections of State receipts and expenditures in the State's
1993-94 fiscal year.
Fiscal difficulties experienced by the City of Yonkers ("Yonkers")
resulted in the creation of the Financial Control Board for the City of
Yonkers (the "Yonkers Board") by the State in 1984. The Yonkers Board
is charged with oversight of the fiscal affairs of Yonkers. Future actions
taken by the Governor or the State Legislature to assist Yonkers could result
in allocation of State resources in amounts that cannot yet be determined.
Municipalities and school districts have engaged in substantial short-term and
long-term borrowings. In 1991, the total indebtedness of all localities in the
State was approximately $31.6 billion, of which $16.8 billion was debt of New
York City (excluding $6.7 billion in MAC debt). State law requires the
Comptroller to review and make recommendations concerning the budgets of those
local government units other than New York City authorized by State law to
issue debt to finance deficits during the period that such deficit financing
is outstanding. Fifteen localities had outstanding indebtedness for state
financing at the close of their fiscal year ending in 1991. In 1992, an
unusually large number of local government units requested authorization for
deficit financings. According to the Comptroller, ten local government units
have been authorized to issue deficit financing in the aggregate amount of
$131.1 million.
Certain proposed Federal expenditure reductions could reduce, or in some cases
eliminate, Federal funding of some local programs and accordingly might impose
substantial increased expenditure requirements on affected localities. If the
State, New York City or any of the Agencies were to suffer serious financial
difficulties jeopardizing their respective access to the public credit
markets, the marketability of notes and bonds issued by localities within the
State, including notes or bonds in the New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered
Maturity Trust, could be adversely affected. Localities also face anticipated
and potential problems resulting from certain pending litigation, judicial
decisions, and long-range economic trends. The longer-range potential problems
of declining urban population, increasing expenditures, and other economic
trends could adversely affect localities and require increasing State
assistance in the future.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on New
York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust Units, see "Other
Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Tanner Propp & Farber, special counsel to the Fund for New
York tax matters, under existing New York law:
The New York IM-IT Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation and
the income of the New York IM-IT Trust will be treated as the income of the
Unitholders under the income tax laws of the State and City of New York.
Individuals who reside in New York State or City will not be subject to State
and City tax on interest income which is exempt from Federal income tax under
section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and derived from obligations
of New York State or a political subdivision thereof, although they will be
subject to New York State and City tax with respect to any gains realized when
such obligations are sold, redeemed or paid at maturity or when any such Units
are sold or redeemed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per Unit Information:
<S> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit.................................... $ 61.94
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F1>................................. $ 2.10
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit......................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 59.84
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings Per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 59.84
Divided by 12................................................................ $ 4.99
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit......................... $ .16623
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F2><F3><F4>.......... 5.98%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F2><F3><F4>....................................... 6.08%
Initial Distribution (December 1994).......................................... $ 4.65
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F4>................................... $ 4.99
Purchased Interest <F5>....................................................... $ 10.32
Trustee's Annual Fee...............$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Record and Computation Dates.......FIRST day of each month FIFTEENTH day of
each month commencing December 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1>Excluding insurance costs.
<F2>The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased for
transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F3>The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated
net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no
assurance that the present Estimated Current Return indicated above will be
realized in the future. The Estimated Long-Term Return is calculated using a
formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the
relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account
the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated
retirements of all of the Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account
the expenses and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the
market values and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of
the Trust will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Long-Term Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated Current
Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and Public
Offering Price.
<F4>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders".
<F5>See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
NEW YORK INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 122 (168TH INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate andMaturity Date of either Redemption New York
Principal<F1> Bonds Deposited orBonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> IM-IT Trust<F4>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (State
University Educational Facilities) Series B (FSA Insured)
#6.00% Due 5/15/2017 ............................................ AAA 2000 @ 100 $ 460,450
500,000 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Transportation
Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series O (MBIA Insured) #6.375% Due 2004 @ 101.5
7/1/2020 ........................................................ AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 482,655
500,000 New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (New York) Health
System Revenue Bonds, Series 1993A (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) 2003 @ 102
#5.75% Due 2/15/2022 ............................................ AAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 441,325
100,000 New York State Medical Care Facilities Finance Agency, Mental
Health Services Facilities Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2003 @ 102
1993A (AMBAC Indemnity Insured) #5.80% Due 8/15/2022 ........... AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 88,076
100,000 New York State Thruway Authority, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 @ 100
1992A (FGIC Insured) #5.50% Due 1/1/2023 ....................... AAA 2020 @ 100 S.F. 85,157
450,000 New Rochelle, New York, Unlimited Tax-General Obligation Bonds,
Series B (MBIA Insured) 6.20% Due 8/15/2023 .................... AAA 2004 @ 102 423,648
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (City
University System) 3rd Resolution Series 1 (AMBAC Indemnity 2004 @ 102
Insured) #6.30% Due 7/1/2024 ................................... AAA 2021 @ 100 S.F. 476,815
500,000 New York State Energy Research and Development Authority,
Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (New York State
Electric and Gas Corporation) Series 1994A (MBIA Insured) 6.05%
Due 4/1/2034 .................................................... AAA 2004 @ 102 452,955
$ 3,150,000 $ 2,911,081
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST
General. The Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust consists of 8 issues of Securities. One
of the Bonds in the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust is a general obligation of the
governmental entity issuing it and is backed by the taxing power thereof. The
remaining issues are payable from the income of a specific project or
authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. These
issues are divided by purpose of issues (and percentage of principal amount to
total Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust) as follows: Water and Sewer, 3 (36%); Health
Care, 3 (31%); Retail Electric/Gas, 1 (17%) and General Obligations, 1 (16%).
No Bond issue has received a provisional rating.
Risk Factors. Investors should be aware of certain factors that might affect
the financial conditions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania
historically has been identified as a heavy industry state although that
reputation has changed recently as the industrial composition of the
Commonwealth diversified when the coal, steel and railroad industries began to
decline. A more diversified economy was necessary as the traditionally strong
industries in the Commonwealth declined due to a long-term shift in jobs,
investment and workers away from the northeast part of the nation. The major
sources of growth in Pennsylvania are in the service sector, including trade,
medical and the health services, education and financial institutions.
Pennsylvania's agricultural industries are also an important component of the
Commonwealth's economic structure, accounting for more than $3.6 billion in
crop and livestock products annually, while agribusiness and food related
industries support $39 billion in economic activity annually.
Non-agricultural employment in the Commonwealth declined by 5.1 percent during
the recessionary period from 1980 to 1983. In 1984, the declining trend was
reversed as employment grew by 2.9 percent over 1983 levels. From 1983 to
1990, Commonwealth employment continued to grow each year, increasing an
additional 14.3 percent. For the last three years, unemployment in the
Commonwealth has declined 1.2 percent. The growth in employment experienced in
Pennsylvania is comparable to the growth in employment in the Middle Atlantic
Region which has occurred during this period.
Back to back recessions in the early 1980s reduced the manufacturing sector's
employment levels moderately during 1980 and 1981, sharply during 1982, and
even further in 1983. Non-manufacturing employment has increased steadily
since 1980 to its 1993 level of 81.6 percent of total Commonwealth employment.
Consequently, manufacturing employment constitutes a diminished share of total
employment within the Commonwealth. Manufacturing, contributing 18.4 percent
of 1993 non-agricultural employment, has fallen behind both the services
sector and the trade sector as the largest single source of employment within
the Commonwealth. In 1993 the services sector accounted for 29.9 percent of
all non-agricultural employment while the trade sector accounted for 22.4
percent.
From 1983 to 1989, Pennsylvania's annual average unemployment rate dropped
from 11.8 percent to 4.5 percent, falling below the national rate in 1986 for
the first time in over a decade. Pennsylvania's annual average unemployment
rate remained below the national average from 1986 until 1990. Slower economic
growth caused the unemployment rate in the Commonwealth to rise to 6.9 percent
in 1991 and 7.5 percent in 1992. The resumption of faster economic growth
resulted in a decrease in the Commonwealth's unemployment rate to 7.1 percent
in 1993. As of July 1994, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the
Commonwealth was 6.5 percent compared to 6.1 percent for the United States.
The five year period from fiscal 1989 through fiscal 1993 was marked by public
health and welfare costs growing at a rate double the growth rate for all the
state expenditures. Rising caseloads, increased utilization of services and
rising prices joined to produce the rapid rise of public health and welfare
costs at a time when a national recession caused tax revenues to stagnate and
even decline. During the period from fiscal 1989 through fiscal 1993, public
health and welfare costs rose by an average annual rate of 10.9 percent while
tax revenues were growing at an average annual rate of 5.5 percent.
Consequently, spending on other budget programs was restrained to a growth
rate below 5.0 percent and sources of revenues other than taxes became larger
components of fund revenues. Among those sources are transfers from other
funds and hospital and nursing home pooling of contributions to use as federal
matching funds.
Tax revenues declined in fiscal 1991 as a result of the recession in the
economy. A $2.7 billion tax increase enacted for fiscal 1992 brought financial
stability to the General Fund. That tax increase included several taxes with
retroactive effective dates which generated some one-time revenues during
fiscal 1992. The absence of those revenues in fiscal 1993 contributed to the
decline in tax revenues shown for fiscal 1993.
It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local
Pennsylvania issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations
issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and there is no obligation on the
part of the Commonwealth to make payment on such local obligations in the
event of default.
Financial information for the principal operating funds of the Commonwealth is
maintained on a budgetary basis of accounting. A budgetary basis of accounting
is used for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the enacted operating
budget and is governed by applicable statutes of the Commonwealth and by
administrative procedures. The Commonwealth also prepares annual financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("
GAAP"). The budgetary basis financial information maintained by the
Commonwealth to monitor and enforce budgetary control is adjusted at fiscal
year-end to reflect appropriate accruals for financial reporting in conformity
with GAAP.
Fiscal 1991 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: During fiscal 1991 the General Fund
experienced an $861.2 million operating deficit resulting in a fund balance
deficit of $980.9 million at June 30, 1991. The operating deficit was a
consequence of the effect of a national recession that restrained budget
revenues and pushed expenditures above budgeted levels. At June 30, 1991, a
negative unreserved-undesignated balance of $1,146.2 million was reported.
During fiscal 1991 the balance then available in the Tax Stabilization Reserve
Fund was used to maintain vital state spending.
Budgetary Basis: A deficit of $453.6 million was recorded by the General Fund
at June 30, 1991. The deficit was a consequence of higher-than-budgeted
expenditures and lower-than-estimated revenues during the fiscal year brought
about by the national economic recession that began during the fiscal year.
The budgetary basis deficit at June 30, 1991 was carried into the 1992 fiscal
year and funded in the fiscal 1992 budget. A number of actions were taken
throughout the fiscal year by the Commonwealth to mitigate the effects of the
recession on budget revenues and expenditures. Actions taken, together with
normal appropriation lapses, produced $871 million in expenditure reductions
and increases in revenues and other transfers for the fiscal year. The most
significant of these actions were a $214 million transfer from the
Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority, a $134 million transfer from
the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund, and a pooled financing program to match
federal Medicaid funds replacing $145 million of state funds.
Fiscal 1992 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: During fiscal 1992 the General Fund
reported a $1.1 billion operating surplus. This operating surplus was achieved
through legislated tax rate increases and tax base broadening measures enacted
in August 1991 and by controlling expenditures through numerous cost reduction
measures implemented throughout the fiscal year. As a result of the fiscal
1992 operating surplus, the fund balance increased to $87.5 million and the
unreserved-undesignated deficit dropped to $138.6 million from its fiscal 1991
level of $1,146.2 million.
Budgetary Basis: Eliminating the budget deficit carried into fiscal 1992 from
fiscal 1991 and providing revenues for fiscal 1992 budgeted expenditures
required tax revisions that were estimated to have increased receipts for the
1992 fiscal year by over $2.7 billion. Total revenues for the fiscal year were
$14,516.8 million, a $2,654.5 million increase over cash revenues during
fiscal 1991. Originally based on forecasts for an economic recovery, the
budget revenue estimates were revised downward during the fiscal year to
reflect continued recessionary economic activity. Largely due to the tax
revisions enacted for the budget, corporate tax receipts totalled $3,761.2
million, up from $2,656.3 million in fiscal 1991, sales tax receipts increased
by $302 million to $4,499.7 million, and personal income tax receipts totalled
$4,807.4 million, an increase of $1,443.8 million over receipts in fiscal
1991.
As a result of the lowered revenue estimate during the fiscal year, increased
emphasis was placed on restraining expenditure growth and reducing expenditure
levels. A number of cost reductions were implemented during the fiscal year
that contributed to $296.8 million of appropriation lapses. These
appropriation lapses were responsible for the $8.8 million surplus at fiscal
year-end, after accounting for the required ten percent transfer of the
surplus to the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund.
Spending increases in the fiscal 1992 budget were largely accounted for by
increases for education, social services and corrections programs.
Commonwealth funds for the support of public schools were increased by 9.8
percent to provide a $438 million increase to $4.9 billion for fiscal 1992.
The fiscal 1992 budget provided additional funds for basic and special
education and included provisions designed to help restrain the annual
increase of special education costs, an area of recent rapid cost increases.
Child welfare appropriations supporting county operated child welfare programs
were increased $67 million, more than 31.5 percent over fiscal 1991. Other
social service areas such as medical and cash assistance also received
significant funding increases as costs rose quickly as a result of the
economic recession and high inflation rates of medical care costs. The costs
of corrections programs, reflecting the marked increase in the prisoner
population, increased by 12 percent. Economic development efforts, largely
funded from bond proceeds in fiscal 1991, were continued with General Fund
appropriations for fiscal 1992.
The budget included the use of several Medicaid pooled financing transactions.
These pooling transactions replaced $135 million of Commonwealth funds,
allowing total spending under the budget to increase by an equal amount.
Fiscal 1993 Financial Results. GAAP Basis: The fund balance of the General
Fund increased by $611.4 million during the fiscal year, led by an increase in
the unreserved balance of $576.8 million over the prior fiscal year balance.
At June 30, 1993, the fund balance totalled $698.9 and the
unreserved/undesignated balance totalled $64.4 million. A continuing recovery
of the Commonwealth's financial condition from the effects of the national
economic recession of 1990 and 1991 is demonstrated by this increase in the
balance and a return to a positive unreserved/undesignated balance. The
previous positive unreserved/undesignated balance was recorded in fiscal 1987.
For the second consecutive fiscal year the increase in the
unreserved/undesignated balance exceeded the increase recorded in the
budgetary basis unappropriated surplus during the fiscal year.
Budgetary Basis: The 1993 fiscal year closed with revenues higher than
anticipated and expenditures about as projected, resulting in an ending
unappropriated balance surplus (prior to the ten percent transfer to the Tax
Stabilization Reserve Fund) of $242.3 million, slightly higher than estimated
in May 1993. Cash revenues were $41.5 million above the budget estimate and
totalled $14.633 billion representing less than a one percent increase over
revenues for the 1992 fiscal year. A reduction in the personal income tax rate
in July 1992 and the one-time receipt of revenues from retroactive corporate
tax increases in fiscal 1992 were responsible, in part, for the low revenue
growth in fiscal 1993.
Appropriations less lapses totalled $13.870 billion representing a 1.1 percent
increase over expenditures during fiscal 1992. The low growth in spending is a
consequence of a low rate of revenue growth, significant one-time expenses
during fiscal 1992, increased tax refund reserves to cushion against adverse
decisions on pending litigations, and the receipt of federal funds for
expenditures previously paid out of Commonwealth funds.
By state statute, ten percent of the budgetary basis unappropriated surplus at
the end of a fiscal year is to be transferred to the Tax Stabilization Reserve
Fund. The transfer for the fiscal 1993 balance was $24.2 million. The
remaining unappropriated surplus of $218.0 million was carried forward into
the 1994 fiscal year.
Fiscal 1994 Financial Results (Budgetary Basis). Commonwealth revenues during
the fiscal year totalled $15,210.7 million, $38.6 million above the fiscal
year estimate, and 3.9 percent over Commonwealth revenues during the previous
fiscal year. The sales tax was an important contributor to the higher than
estimated revenues. Collections from the sales tax were $5.124 billion, a 6.1
percent increase from the prior fiscal year and $81.3 million above estimate.
The strength of collections from the sales tax offset the lower than budgeted
performance of the personal income tax which ended the fiscal year $74.4
million below estimate. The shortfall in the personal income tax was largely
due to shortfalls in income not subject to withholding such as interest,
dividends and other income. Tax refunds in fiscal 1994 were reduced
substantially below the $530 million amount provided in fiscal 1993. The
higher fiscal 1993 amount and the reduced fiscal 1994 amount occurred because
reserves of approximately $160 million were added to fiscal 1993 tax refunds
to cover potential payments if the Commonwealth lost litigation known as
Philadelphia Suburban Corp v. Commonwealth. Those reserves were carried into
fiscal 1994 until the litigation was decided in the Commonwealth's favor in
December 1993 and $147.3 million of reserves for tax refunds were released.
Expenditures, excluding pooled financing expenditures and net of all fiscal
1994 appropriation lapses, totalled $14,934.4 million representing a 7.2
percent increase over fiscal 1993 expenditures. Medical assistance and
corrections spending contributed to the rate of spending growth for the fiscal
year.
The Commonwealth maintained an operating balance on a budgetary basis for
fiscal 1994 producing a fiscal year ending unappropriated surplus of $335.8
million. By state statute, ten percent ($33.6 million) of that surplus will be
transferred to the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund and the remaining balance
will be carried over into the fiscal 1995 fiscal year.
Fiscal 1995 Budget. The fiscal 1995 budget was approved by the Governor on
June 16, 1994 and provided for $15,652.9 million of appropriations from
Commonwealth funds, an increase of 3.9 percent over appropriations, including
supplemental appropriations, for fiscal 1994. Medical assistance expenditures
represent the largest single increase in the budget ($221 million)
representing a nine percent increase over the prior fiscal year. The budget
includes a reform of the state-funded public assistance program that added
certain categories of eligibility to the program but also limited the
availability of such assistance to other eligible persons. Education subsidies
to local school districts were increased by $132.2 million to continue the
increased funding for the poorest school districts in the state.
The budget also includes tax reductions totalling an estimated $166.4 million.
Low income working families will benefit from an increase of the dependent
exemption to $3,000 from $1,500 for the first dependent and from $1,000 for
all additional dependents. A reduction to the corporate net income tax rate
from 12.25 percent to 9.99 percent to be phased in over a period of four years
was enacted. A net operating loss provision has been added to the corporate
net income tax and will be phased in over three years with a $500,000 per firm
annual cap on losses used to offset profits. Several other tax changes to the
sales tax, the inheritance tax and the capital stock and franchise tax were
also enacted.
The fiscal 1995 budget projects a $4 million fiscal year-end unappropriated
surplus. No assumption as to appropriation lapses in fiscal 1995 has been made.
All outstanding general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth are rated AA- by
S&P and A1 by Moody's.
Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings must be obtained
from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any ratings will continue
for any period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn.
The City of Philadelphia ("Philadelphia") is the largest city in the
Commonwealth, with an estimated population of 1,585,577 according to the 1990
Census. Philadelphia functions both as a city of the first class and a county
for the purpose of administering various governmental programs.
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 1991, Philadelphia experienced a
cumulative General Fund balance deficit of $153.5 million. The audit findings
for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1992, place the Cumulative General Fund
balance deficit at $224.9.
Legislation providing for the establishment of the Pennsylvania
Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority ("PICA") to assist first class
cities in remedying fiscal emergencies was enacted by the General Assembly and
approved by the Governor in June, 1991. PICA is designed to provide assistance
through the issuance of funding debt to liquidate budget deficits and to make
factual findings and recommendations to the assisted city concerning its
budgetary and fiscal affairs. An intergovernmental cooperation agreement
between Philadelphia and PICA was approved by City Council on January 3, 1992,
and approved by the PICA Board and signed by the Mayor on January 8, 1992. At
this time, Philadelphia is operating under a five year fiscal plan approved by
PICA on April 6, 1992. Full implementation of the five year plan was delayed
due to labor negotiations that were not completed until October 1992, three
months after the expiration of the old labor contracts. The terms of the new
labor contracts are estimated to cost approximately $144.0 million more than
what was budgeted in the original five year plan. An amended five year plan
was approved by PICA in May 1993. The audit findings show a surplus of
approximately $3 million for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993. The fiscal
1994 budget projects no deficit and a balanced budget for the year ending June
30, 1994. The Mayor's latest update of the five year financial plan was
approved by PICA on May 2, 1994.
In June 1992, PICA issued $474,555,000 of its Special Tax Revenue Bonds to
provide financial assistance to Philadelphia and to liquidate the cumulative
General Fund balance deficit. PICA issued $643,430,000 in July 1993 and
$178,675,000 in August 1993 of Special Tax Revenue Bonds to refund certain
general obligation bonds of the City and to fund additional capital projects.
As of the date hereof, the ratings on the City's long-term obligations
supported by payments from the City's General Fund are rated Ba by Moody's and
BB by S&P. Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings must be
obtained from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any ratings will
continue for any period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn.
The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the
financial difficulties which may impact certain issuers of bonds and does not
purport to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions
to which the issuers of the Bonds in the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust are subject.
Additionally, many factors including national economic, social and
environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the
issuers of Bonds, could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of
the State and various agencies and political subdivisions located in the
State. The Sponsor is unable to predict whether or to what extent such factors
or other factors may affect the issuers of Bonds, the market value or
marketability of the Bonds or the ability of the respective issuers of the
Bonds acquired by the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust to pay interest on or principal
of the Bonds.
Tax Status. For a discussion of the Federal tax status of income earned on
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust Units, see "Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
In the opinion of Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, counsel to the Fund for
Pennsylvania tax matters, under existing law:
Units evidencing fractional undivided interest in the Pennsylvania IM-IT
Trust, which are represented by obligations issued by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, any public authority, commission, board or other agency created
by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, any political subdivision of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or any public authority created by any such
political subdivision are not taxable under any of the personal property taxes
presently in effect in Pennsylvania;
distributions of interest income to Unitholders that would not be taxable it
received directly by a Pennsylvania resident are not subject to personal
income tax under the Pennsylvania Tax Reform Code of 1971; nor will such
interest be taxable under the Philadelphia School District Investment Income
Tax imposed on Philadelphia resident individuals;
a Unitholder will have a taxable event under the Pennsylvania state and local
income taxes referred to in the preceding paragraph upon the redemption or
sale of his Units. Units will be taxable under the Pennsylvania inheritance
and estate taxes;
a Unitholder which is a corporation will have a taxable event under the
Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax when it redeems or sells its Units.
Interest income distributed to Unitholders which are corporations is not
subject to Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax or Mutual Thrift Institutions
Tax. However, banks, title insurance companies and trust companies may be
required to take the value of the Units into account in determining the
taxable value of their shares subject to the Shares Tax;
under Act No. 68 of December 3, 1993, gains derived by the Fund from the sale,
exchange or other disposition of Bonds may be subject to Pennsylvania personal
or corporate income taxes. Those gains which are distributed by the Fund to
Unitholders who are individuals may be subject to Pennsylvania Personal Income
Tax. For Unitholders which are corporations, the distributed gains may be
subject to Corporate Net Income Tax or Mutual Thrift Institutions Tax. Gains
which are not distributed by the Fund may nevertheless be taxable to
Unitholders if derived by the Fund from the sale, exchange or other
disposition of Bonds issued on or after February 1, 1994. Gains which are not
distributed by the Fund will remain nontaxable to Unitholders if derived by
the Fund from the sale, exchange or other disposition of Bonds issued prior to
February 1, 1994;
any proceeds paid under insurance policies issued to the Trustee or obtained
by the issuers of the Bonds with respect to the Bonds which represent maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be excludable from
Pennsylvania gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would
have been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations; and
the Fund is not taxable as a corporation under Pennsylvania tax laws
applicable to corporations.
On December 3, 1993, changes to Pennsylvania laws affecting taxation of income
and gains from the sale of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and local obligations
were enacted. Among these changes was the repeal of the exemption from tax of
gains realized upon the sale or other disposition of such obligations. The
Pennsylvania Department of Revenue has issued proposed regulations concerning
these changes. The opinions expressed above are based on our analysis of the
law and proposed regulations but are subject to modification upon review of
final regulations or other guidance that may be issued by the Department of
Revenue or future court decisions.
In rendering its opinion, Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul has not, for timing
reasons, made an independent review of proceedings related to the issuance of
the Bonds. It has relied on Van Kampen Merritt Inc. for assurance that the
Bonds have been issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or by or on behalf
of municipalities or other governmental agencies within the Commonwealth.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per Unit Information:
<S> <C>
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Unit Income <F1>:
Estimated Annual Interest Income per Unit.................................... $ 61.11
Less: Estimated Annual Expense per Unit <F2>................................. $ 1.52
Less: Annual Premium on Portfolio Insurance per Unit......................... --
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 59.59
Calculation of Estimated Interest Earnings Per Unit:
Estimated Net Annual Interest Income per Unit................................ $ 59.59
Divided by 12................................................................ $ 4.97
Estimated Daily Rate of Net Interest Accrual per Unit......................... $ .16551
Estimated Current Return Based on Public Offering Price <F1><F3><F4><F5>...... 5.96%
Estimated Long-Term Return <F3><F4><F5>....................................... 6.02%
Initial Distribution (December 1994).......................................... $ 4.63
Estimated Normal Distribution per Unit <F5>................................... $ 4.97
Purchased Interest <F6>....................................................... $ 10.27
Trustee's Annual Fee <F1>..........$.98 per $1,000 principal amount of Bonds
Record and Computation Dates.......FIRST day of each month
Distribution Dates ................FIFTEENTH day of each month commencing
December 15, 1994
<FN>
<F1>During the first year the Trustee will reduce its fee by approximately $.53
per Unit (which amount is the estimated interest to be earned per Unit prior
to the expected delivery dates for the "when, as and if issued"Bonds
included in this Trust). Should such estimated interest exceed such amount,
the Trustee will reduce its fee up to its annual fee. After the first year,
the Trustee's fee will be that amount indicated above. Estimated annual
interest income per Unit will be increased to $61.64. Estimated Annual Expense
per Unit (excluding insurance) will be increased to $2.05; and estimated net
annual interest income per Unit will remain the same as shown. See "
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns."Based on the
outstanding principal amount of Securities as of the Date of Deposit, the
Trustee's annual fee would be $2,994.
<F2>Excluding insurance costs.
<F3>The Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are increased for
transactions entitled to a reduced sales charge. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
<F4>The Estimated Current Return is calculated by dividing the estimated net
annual interest income per Unit by the Public Offering Price. The estimated
net annual interest income per Unit will vary with changes in fees and
expenses of the Trustee and the Evaluator and with the principal prepayment,
redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of Securities while the Public Offering
Price will vary with changes in the offering price of the underlying
Securities and with changes in the Purchased Interest; therefore, there is no
assurance that the present Estimated Current Return indicated above will be
realized in the future. The Estimated Long-Term Return is calculated using a
formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the
relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account
the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated
retirements of all of the Securities in the Trust and (2) takes into account
the expenses and sales charge associated with each Trust Unit. Since the
market values and estimated retirements of the Securities and the expenses of
the Trust will change, there is no assurance that the present Estimated
Long-Term Return as indicated above will be realized in the future. The
Estimated Current Return and Estimated Long-Term Return are expected to differ
because the calculation of the Estimated Long-Term Return reflects the
estimated date and amount of principal returned while the Estimated Current
Return calculation includes only net annual interest income and Public
Offering Price.
<F5>These figures are based on estimated per Unit cash flows. Estimated cash flows
will vary with changes in fees and expenses, with changes in current interest
rates and with the principal prepayment, redemption, maturity, call, exchange
or sale of the underlying Securities. The estimated cash flows for this Series
are set forth under "Estimated Cash Flows to Unitholders".
<F6>See "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased and Accrued Interest".
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
PENNSYLVANIA INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
SERIES 194 (168TH INSURED MULTI-SERIES)
PORTFOLIO As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
Offering
Price To
Aggregate Name of Issuer, Title, Interest Rate andMaturity Date of either Redemption Pennsylvania
Principal<F1> Bonds Deposited orBonds Contracted for<F1><F5> Rating<F2> Feature<F3> IM-IT Trust<F4
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 100,000 City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Water and Wastewater Revenue
Bonds, Series 1993 (Capital Guaranty Insured) #5.50% Due
6/15/2015 ........................................................ AAA 2003 @ 102 $ 85,212
500,000 School District of Haverford Township, Delaware County,
Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1994B (FGIC 2004 @ 100
Insured)** #6.25% Due 6/1/2019 .................................. AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 481,320
205,000 Erie County Hospital Authority (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania)
Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1992B (Saint Vincent 2002 @ 102
Health Center Project) MBIA Insured #6.375% Due 7/1/2022 ........ AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 198,399
500,000 Exeter Township, Berks County, Authority, Berks County,
Pennsylvania, Guaranteed Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (MBIA 2002 @ 100
Insured) #6.20% Due 7/15/2022 ................................... AAA 2014 @ 100 S.F. 477,145
500,000 North Penn Water Authority (Montgomery County, Pennsylvania)
Water Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 (FGIC Insured) #6.20% Due 2002 @ 101
11/1/2022 ........................................................ AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 477,115
250,000 Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority (Pennsylvania)
Health Center Revenue Bonds, Series 1992A (Presbyterian
University Health System, Inc. Project) MBIA Insured #6.25% Due 2002 @ 100
11/1/2023 ........................................................ AAA 2013 @ 100 S.F. 236,940
500,000 Wayne County Hospital and Health Facilities Authority, Wayne
County, Pennsylvania, County Guaranteed Hospital Revenue Bonds
(Wayne Memorial Hospital Project) Series 1994 (MBIA Insured) 2004 @ 100
#6.375% Due 7/1/2024 ............................................. AAA 2015 @ 100 S.F. 483,485
500,000 Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority, Pollution Control
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Pennsylvania Power and Light Company
Project) Series 1994B (MBIA Insured) 6.40% Due 9/1/2029 ......... AAA 2004 @ 102 481,970
$ 3,055,000 $ 2,921,586
</TABLE>
All of the Bonds in the portfolio are insured by one of the Preinsured Bond
Insurers as indicated in the Bond name. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts".
For an explanation of the footnotes used on this page, see "Notes to
Portfolios".
NOTES TO PORTFOLIOS:As of the Date of Deposit: October 27, 1994
(1)All Securities are represented by "regular way"or "when
issued"contracts for the performance of which an irrevocable letter of
credit, obtained from an affiliate of the Trustee, has been deposited with the
Trustee. At the Date of Deposit, Securities may have been delivered to the
Sponsor pursuant to certain of these contracts; the Sponsor has assigned to
the Trustee all of its right, title and interest in and to such Securities.
Contracts to acquire Securities were entered into during the period from
October 13,1994 to October 27,1994. These Securities have expected settlement
dates ranging from October 27,1994 to November 22,1994 (see "Unitholder
Explanations").
(2)All ratings are by Standard & Poor's Corporation unless otherwise
indicated. "*"indicates that the rating of the Bond is by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. The ratings represent the latest published ratings by
the respective ratings agency or, if not published, represent private letter
ratings or those ratings expected to be published by the respective ratings
agency. "Y"indicates that such rating is contingent upon physical
receipt by the respective ratings agency of a policy of insurance obtained by
the issuer of the bonds involved and issued by the Preinsured Bond Insurer
named in the bond's title. A commitment for insurance in connection with these
bonds has been issued by the Preinsured Bond Insurer named in the bond's
title. "N/R"indicates that the applicable rating service did not
provide a rating for that particular Security. For a brief description of the
rating symbols and their related meanings, see "Other Matters--Description
of Securities Ratings".
(3)There is shown under this heading the year in which each issue of Bonds is
initially or currently callable and the call price for that year. Each issue
of Bonds continues to be callable at declining prices thereafter (but not
below par value) except for original issue discount bonds which are redeemable
at prices based on the issue price plus the amount of original issue discount
accreted to redemption date plus, if applicable, some premium, the amount of
which will decline in subsequent years. "S.F."indicates a sinking
fund is established with respect to an issue of Bonds. Redemption pursuant to
call provisions generally will, and redemption pursuant to sinking fund
provisions may, occur at times when the redeemed bonds have an offering side
valuation which represents a premium over par. Certain Bonds may be subject to
redemption without premium prior to the date shown pursuant to extraordinary
optional or mandatory redemptions if certain events occur. Single family
mortgage revenue bonds and housing authority bonds are most likely to be
called subject to such provisions, but other bonds may have similar call
features. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, certain bond issuers
have in the past and others may in the future attempt to redeem Bonds prior to
their initially scheduled call dates and at prices which do not include any
premiums. For a general discussion of certain of these events, see "
Unitholder Explanations--Bond Redemptions". To the extent that the
Securities were deposited in a Trust at a price higher than the price at which
they are redeemed, this will represent a loss of capital when compared with
the original Public Offering Price of the Units. Conversely, to the extent
that the Bonds were acquired at a price lower than the redemption price, this
will represent an increase in capital when compared with the original Public
Offering Price of the Units. Distributions will generally be reduced by the
amount of the income which would otherwise have been paid with respect to
redeemed Securities and there will be distributed to Unitholders the principal
amount and any premium received on such redemption. The Estimated Current
Return and Estimated Long-Term Return in this event may be affected by such
redemptions. For the Federal tax effect on Unitholders of such redemptions and
resultant distributions, see paragraph (2) under "Other Matters--Federal
Tax Status".
(4)Evaluation of Securities is made on the basis of current offering prices
for the Securities. The offering prices are greater than the current bid
prices of the Securities which is the basis on which Unit value is determined
for purposes of redemption of Units (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Offering Price").
(5)Other information regarding the Bonds in each Trust, as of the Date of
Deposit, is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual
Annual Profit Interest Bid Side
Trust Insurance Cost to (Loss) to Income to Evaluation of
Cost Sponsor Sponsor Trust Bonds
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California IM-IT................................ $-- $ 2,863,965 $ 18,355 $ 190,275 $ 2,858,563
Florida IM-IT................................... $-- $ 2,866,479 $ 12,547 $ 183,835 $ 2,856,425
Minnesota IM-IT................................. $-- $ 2,959,220 $ ( 17,003) $ 187,138 $ 2,917,691
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity... $-- $ 2,910,171 $ 4,507 $ 147,250 $ 2,892,375
New York IM-IT.................................. $-- $ 2,907,299 $ 3,782 $ 191,575 $ 2,887,563
Pennsylvania IM-IT.............................. $-- $ 2,921,076 $ 510 $ 191,319 $ 2,897,550
</TABLE>
The Sponsor may have entered into contracts which hedge interest rate
fluctuations on certain Bonds in certain Portfolios. The cost of any such
contracts and the corresponding gain or loss is included in the Cost to
Sponsor. Certain Securities in the Fund, if any, marked by a double asterisk
(**), have been purchased on a "when, as and if issued"or "
delayed delivery"basis. Interest on these Securities begins accruing to
the benefit of Unitholders on their respective dates of delivery. Delivery is
expected to take place at various dates after the First Settlement Date as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percent of
Trust Aggregate Principal Range of Days Subsequent
Amount to First Settlement Date
<S> <C> <C>
California IM-IT................................ 16% 6 days
Florida IM-IT................................... 12% 7 days
Minnesota IM-IT................................. 30% 11 days
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity... -- --
New York IM-IT.................................. -- --
Pennsylvania IM-IT.............................. 16% 19 days
</TABLE>
On the Date of Deposit, the offering side evaluations of the Securities in the
California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity, New York IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts were higher
than the bid side evaluations of such Securities by 0.78%, 0.76%, 0.78%,
0.74%, 0.75% and 0.79%, respectively, of the aggregate principal amounts of
such Securities.
"#"indicates that such Bond was issued at an original issue discount.
The tax effect of Bonds issued at an original issue discount is described in
"Other Matters--Federal Tax Status".
Underwriting. The Underwriters named below have severally purchased Units in
the following respective amounts from the Sponsor.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
California
IM-IT Trust
Name Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,206
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
Crowell, Weedon & Company One Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90017 100
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Fidelity Capital Markets
A Division of National Financial
Services Corporation 161 Devonshire Street D4, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York,
Unit Investment Trust Dept. New York 10292 100
3,056
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Florida
Name IM-IT Trust
Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,658
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York,
Unit Investment Trust Dept. New York 10292 100
3,058
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Minnesota
Name IM-IT Trust
Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,725
Dain Bosworth Plaza, 60 South Sixth Street, P15C, Minneapolis, Min
Dain Bosworth Incorporated nesota 55402 100
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Edward D. Jones & Co. 201 Progress Parkway, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043 100
3,125
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
New York
IM-IT
Intermediate
Laddered
Name Maturity Trust
Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,450
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 250
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Invest Financial Corp. 5404 Cypress Center Drive, Suite 300, Tampa, Florida 33609 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York,
Unit Investment Trust Dept. New York 10292 100
3,000
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
New York
Name IM-IT Trust
Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,493
Advest, Inc. 280 Trumbull Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 100
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
First Investors Corporation 95 Wall Street, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10005 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York,
Unit Investment Trust Dept. New York 10292 100
3,093
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pennsylvania
Name IM-IT Trust
Address Units
<S> <C> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. One Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 2,054
Wheat, First Securities, Inc. River Front Plaza, 901 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 250
Advest, Inc. 280 Trumbull Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 100
Dean Witter Reynolds, Incorporated 2 World Trade Center, 59th Floor, New York, New York 10048 100
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. One North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103 100
Gruntal & Co., Incorporated 14 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 100
Janney Montgomery Scott Inc. 1801 Market Street, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 100
Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc. 111 South Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202 100
Parker/Hunter, Incorporated 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 100
Prudential Securities Inc. 32 Old Slip, 16th Floor, Financial Square, New York,
Unit Investment Trust Dept. New York 10292 100
3,104
</TABLE>
Units may also be sold to broker-dealers and others at prices representing the
per Unit concession or agency commission stated under "Trust
Administration--General--Unit Distribution". However, resales of Units by
such broker-dealers and others to the public will be made at the Public
Offering Price described in the Prospectus. The Sponsor reserves the right to
reject, in whole or in part, any order for the purchase of Units and the right
to change the amount of the concession or agency commission from time to time.
In addition to any other benefits the Underwriters may realize from the sale
of the Units of the Fund, the Agreement Among Underwriters provides that the
Sponsor will share on a pro rata basis among those Underwriters who underwrite
at least 250 Units 50% of the aggregate gain, if any, represented by the
difference between the Sponsor's cost of the Securities in connection with
their acquisition and the evaluation thereof on the Date of Deposit less
deductions for certain accrued interest and certain other costs. See "
Trust Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation"and
"Portfolio"for the applicable Trust.
Underwriters and broker-dealers of the Trusts, banks and/or others are
eligible to participate in a program in which such firms receive from the
Sponsor a nominal award for each of their representatives who have sold a
minimum number of units of unit investment trusts created by the Sponsor
during a specified time period. In addition, at various times the Sponsor may
implement other programs under which the sales forces of Underwriters,
brokers, dealers, banks and/or others may be eligible to win other nominal
awards for certain sales efforts, or under which the Sponsor will reallow to
any such Underwriters, brokers, dealers, banks and/or others that sponsor
sales contests or recognition programs conforming to criteria established by
the Sponsor, or participate in sales programs sponsored by the Sponsor, an
amount not exceeding the total applicable sales charges on the sales generated
by such persons at the public offering price during such programs. Also, the
Sponsor in its discretion may from time to time pursuant to objective criteria
established by the Sponsor pay fees to qualifying underwriters, brokers,
dealers, banks or others for certain services or activities which are
primarily intended to result in sales of Units of the Trusts. Such payments
are made by the Sponsor out of its own assets, and not out of the assets of
the Trusts. These programs will not change the price Unitholders pay for their
Units or the amount that the Trusts will receive from the Units sold.
Approximately every eighteen months the Sponsor holds a business seminar which
is open to Underwriters that sell units of trusts it sponsors. The Sponsor
pays substantially all costs associated with the seminar, excluding
Underwriter travel costs. Each Underwriter is invited to send a certain number
of representatives based on the gross number of units such firm underwrites
during a designated time period.
FUND ADMINISTRATION AND EXPENSES
Sponsor. Van Kampen Merritt Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the Sponsor of
the Trust. Van Kampen Merritt Inc. is primarily owned by Clayton, Dubilier &
Rice, Inc., a New York-based private investment firm. Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
management owns a significant minority equity position. Van Kampen Merritt
Inc. specializes in the underwriting and distribution of unit investment
trusts and mutual funds. The Sponsor is a member of the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. and has its principal office at One Parkview
Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, (708) 684-6000. It maintains a branch
office in Philadelphia and has regional representatives in Atlanta, Dallas,
Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Tampa. As of December 31,
1993 the total stockholders' equity of Van Kampen Merritt Inc. was
$122,167,000 (audited). (This paragraph relates only to the Sponsor and not to
the Insured Municipals Income Trust or to any Insured Multi-Series thereof or
to any other Underwriter. The information is included herein only for the
purpose of informing investors as to the financial responsibility of the
Sponsor and its ability to carry out its contractual obligations. More
detailed financial information will be made available by the Sponsor upon
request.)
As of September 30, 1994, the Sponsor and its affiliates managed or supervised
approximately $35.4 billion of investment products, of which over $23 billion
is invested in municipal securities. The Sponsor and its affiliates managed
$22 billion of assets, consisting of $7.7 billion for 20 open end mutual
funds, $8.0 billion for 34 closed-end funds and $6.1 billion for 65
institutional accounts. The Sponsor has also deposited approximately $24.5
billion of unit investment trusts. Based on cumulative assets deposited, the
Sponsor believes that it is the largest sponsor of insured municipal unit
investment trusts, primarily through the success of its Insured Municipals
Income Trust(R)or the IM-IT(R)trust. The Sponsor also provides
surveillance and evaluation services at cost for approximately $13 billion of
unit investment trust assets outstanding. Since 1976, the Sponsor has serviced
over one million retail investor accounts, opened through retail distribution
firms. Van Kampen Merritt Inc. is the sponsor of the various series of the
trusts listed below and the distributor of the mutual funds and closed-end
funds listed below. Unitholders may only invest in the trusts, mutual funds
and closed-end funds which are registered for sale in the state of residence
of such Unitholder. In order for a Unitholder to invest in the trusts, mutual
funds and closed-end funds listed below, such Unitholder must obtain a
prospectus relating to the trust or fund involved. A prospectus is the only
means by which an offer can be delivered to investors.
<TABLE>
Name of Trust Trust Investment Objective
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal
Insured Municipals Income Trust...................................... securities
Double tax-exemption for California residents by investing
California Insured Municipals Income Trust........................... in insured California municipal securities
Double and in certain cases triple tax-exemption for New
York residents by investing in insured New York municipal
New York Insured Municipals Income Trust............................. securities
Double and in certain cases triple tax-exemption for
Pennsylvania residents by investing in insured Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Insured Municipals Income Trust......................... municipal securities
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Insured Multi-Series
(Premium Bond Series, National, Limited Maturity,
Intermediate, Short Intermediate, Discount, Alabama, Arizona,
Arkansas, California, California Intermediate, California
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, California Premium, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Florida Intermediate, Florida Intermediate
Laddered Maturity, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts,
Massachusetts Premium, Michigan, Michigan Intermediate,
Michigan Intermediate Laddered Maturity, Michigan Premium,
Minnesota, Missouri, Missouri Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
Missouri Premium, New Jersey, New Jersey Intermediate
Laddered Maturity, New Mexico, New York, New York
Intermediate, New York Intermediate Laddered Maturity, New Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal
York Limited Maturity, Ohio, Ohio Intermediate, Ohio securities; all issuers of bonds in a state trust are
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, Ohio Premium, Oklahoma, located in such state or in territories or possessions of
Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Intermediate, Pennsylvania the United States-- providing exemptions from all state
Intermediate Laddered Maturity, Pennsylvania Premium, income tax for residents of such state (except for the
Tennessee, Texas, Texas Intermediate Laddered Maturity, Oklahoma IM-IT Trust where a portion of the income of the
Washington, West Virginia).......................................... Trust is subject to the Oklahoma state income tax)
Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal
Insured Tax Free Bond Trust.......................................... securities
Tax-exempt income by investing in insured municipal
securities; all issuers of bonds in a state trust are
Insured Tax Free Bond Trust, Insured Multi-Series located in such state--providing exemptions from state
(National Limited Maturity, New York)............................... income tax for residents of such state
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust.............................. Tax-exempt income by investing in municipal securities
Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series
(National, National AMT, Intermediate, Alabama, Arizona,
Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware,
Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Tax-exempt income by investing in municipal securities; all
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, issuers of bonds in a state trust are located in such state or
New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, in territories or possessions of the United States--providing
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia)......................... exemptions from state income tax for residents of such state
Tax-exempt income for investors not subject to the alternative
minimum tax by investing in municipal securities, some or all of
Investors' Quality Municipals Trust, AMT Series...................which are subject to the Federal alternative minimum tax
Investors' Corporate Income Trust.................................Taxable income by investing in corporate bonds
Investors' Governmental Securities--Income Trust................. Taxable income by investing in government-backed GNMA securities
High current income through an investment in a diversified
portfolio of foreign currency denominated corporate debt
Van Kampen Merritt International Bond Income Trust................obligations
High current income consistent with preservation of capital
through a diversified investment in a fixed portfolio of
Van Kampen Merritt Insured Income Trust...........................insured, long-term or intermediate-term corporate debt securities
High dividend income and capital appreciation by investing in
Van Kampen Merritt Utility Income Trust...........................common stock of electric utilities
Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income by
investing in a portfolio of actively traded, New York Stock
Exchange listed equity securities which are components of the
Van Kampen Merritt Blue Chip Opportunity Trust....................Dow Jones Industrial Average*
Protect Unitholders' capital and provide the potential for
capital appreciation and income by investing a portion of its
portfolio in "zero coupon"U.S. Treasury obligations and
the remainder of the trust's portfolio in actively traded, New
York Stock Exchange listed equity securities which at the time
Van Kampen Merritt Blue Chip Opportunity and of the creation of the trust were components of the Dow Jones
Treasury Trust...................................................Industrial Average*
High current income consistent with preservation of capital
through a diversified investment in a fixed portfolio primarily
consisting of Brady Bonds of emerging market countries that have
restructured sovereign debt pursuant to the framework of the
Van Kampen Merritt Emerging Markets Income Trust..................Brady Plan
Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income
consistent with the preservation of invested capital, by
investing in a portfolio of equity securities which provide
Van Kampen Merritt Global Telecommunications Trust................equipment for or services to the telecommunications industry
Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income
consistent with the preservation of invested capital, by
investing in a portfolio of equity securities diversified within
Van Kampen Merritt Global Energy Trust............................the energy industry
Provide an above average total return through a combination of
potential capital appreciation and dividend income, consistent
with preservation of invested capital, by investing in a
Strategic Ten Trust portfolio of common stocks of the ten companies in a recognized
(United States, United Kingdom, and Hong Kong Portfolios)........stock exchange index having the highest dividend yields
Provide the potential for capital appreciation and income
consistent with the preservation of invested capital, by
investing in a portfolio of equity securities diversified within
Van Kampen Merritt Brand Name Equity Trust........................the non-durable consumer products industry
</TABLE>
*The Dow Jones Industrial Average is the property of Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. has not granted to the Trust or the Sponsor a
license to use the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
<TABLE>
Name of Mutual Fund Fund Investment Objective
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Van Kampen Merritt U.S. Government Fund....................High current income by investing in U.S. Government securities
High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in
Van Kampen Merritt Insured Tax Free Income Fund............insured municipal securities
High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Income Fund...................with preservation of capital
High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in
Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free High Income Fund...............medium and lower grade municipal securities
High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes by
Van Kampen Merritt California Insured Tax Free Fund........investing in insured California municipal securities
Provide a high level of current income by investing in medium and lower
grade domestic and foreign government and corporate debt securities.
Van Kampen Merritt High Yield Fund.........................The Fund will seek capital appreciation as a secondary objective
Long-term growth of both capital and dividend income by investing in
Van Kampen Merritt Growth and Income Fund..................dividend paying common stocks
High current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania state and
local income taxes by investing in medium and lower grade Pennsylvania
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Tax Free Income Fund.......municipal securities
High current income by investing in a broad range of money market
Van Kampen Merritt Money Market Fund.......................instruments that will mature within twelve months
High current income exempt from Federal income taxes by investing in a
broad range of municipal securities that will mature within twelve
Van Kampen Merritt Tax Free Money Fund.....................months
High current income by investing in a global portfolio of high quality
debt securities denominated in various currencies having remaining
Van Kampen Merritt Short-Term Global Income Fund...........maturities of not more than three years
High level of current income with a relatively stable net asset value
Van Kampen Merritt Adjustable Rate U.S. Government Fund....investing in U.S. Government securities
High level of current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent
Van Kampen Merritt Limited Term Municipal Income Fund......with preservation of capital
Provide capital appreciation and current income by investing in a
diversified portfolio of common stocks and income securities issued by
Van Kampen Merritt Utility Fund............................companies engaged in the utilities industry
Provide shareholders with high current income. The Fund will seek
Van Kampen Merritt Strategic Income Fund...................capital appreciation as a secondary objective
High level of current income exempt from federal income tax and Florida
intangible personal property taxes consistent with preservation of
Van Kampen Merritt Florida Insured Tax Free Income Fund....capital
High level of current income exempt from federal income tax and New
Van Kampen Merritt New Jersey Tax Free Income Fund.........Jersey gross income tax consistent with preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from federal New York State and New
Van Kampen Merritt New York Income Fund....................York City income tax consistent with preservation of capital
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
Name of Closed-end Fund Fund Investment Objective
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
High current income exempt from Federal income taxes with safety of
principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of investment
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Income Trust......................grade municipal securities
High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes
with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
Van Kampen Merritt California Municipal Trust..................investment grade California municipal securities
High current income while seeking to preserve shareholders' capital
by investing in a diversified portfolio of high yield fixed income
Van Kampen Merritt Intermediate Term High Income Trust.........securities
High current income while seeking to preserve shareholders' capital
by investing in a diversified portfolio of high yield fixed income
Van Kampen Merritt Limited Term High Income Trust..............securities
High current income, consistent with preservation of capital by
Van Kampen Merritt Prime Rate Income Trust.....................investing in interests in floating or variable rate senior loans....
High current income exempt from Federal income tax, consistent with
Van Kampen Merritt Investment Grade Municipal Trust............preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax,
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Trust.............................consistent with preservation of capital
High current income exempt from Federal and California income taxes
with safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
Van Kampen Merritt California Quality Municipal Trust..........investment grade California municipal securities
High current income exempt from Federal income taxes and Florida
intangible personal property taxes with safety of principal by
investing in a diversified portfolio of investment grade Florida
Van Kampen Merritt Florida Quality Municipal Trust.............municipal securities
High current income exempt from Federal as well as New York State
and New York City income taxes with safety of principal by
investing in a diversified portfolio of investment grade New York
Van Kampen Merritt New York Quality Municipal Trust............municipal securities
High current income exempt from Federal and Ohio income taxes with
safety of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of
Van Kampen Merritt Ohio Quality Municipal Trust................investment grade Ohio municipal securities
High current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania income
taxes with safety of principal by investing in a diversified
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Trust........portfolio of investment grade Pennsylvania municipal securities
High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax,
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade Municipals.......consistent with preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax,
consistent with preservation of capital by investing in a
diversified portfolio of municipal securities which are covered by
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Insured Municipals................insurance with respect to timely payment of principal and interest
High level of current income exempt from Federal and California
income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital by investing
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade CA Municipals....in a diversified portfolio of California municipal securities
High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes,
consistent with preservation of capital. The Fund also seeks to
offer its Shareholders the opportunity to own securities exempt
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade FL Municipals....from Florida intangible personal property taxes
High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade NJ Municipals New Jersey gross income taxes, consistent with preservation of
capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal as well as from
New York State and New York City income taxes, consistent with
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade NY Municipals....preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
income taxes and, where possible under local law, local income and
Van Kampen Merritt Trust for Investment Grade PA Municipals....property taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax,
consistent with preservation of capital by investing in a
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Opportunity Trust.................diversified portfolio of municipal securities
High level of current income exempt from Federal income tax,
consistent with preservation of capital by investing in a
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Municipal Income Trust............diversified portfolio of municipal securities
High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Pennsylvania Municipal income taxes and, where possible under local law, local income and
Income Trust..................................................property taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Provide common shareholders with a high level of current income
exempt from Federal income taxes, consistent with preservation of
Van Kampen Merritt Strategic Sector Municipal Trust............capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes,
Van Kampen Merritt Value Municipal Income Trust................consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt California Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal and California
Income Trust..................................................income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and
Van Kampen Merritt Massachusetts Value Municipal Massachusetts personal income taxes, consistent with preservation
Income Trust.................................................of capital
Van Kampen Merritt New Jersey Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal income taxes and
Income Trust..................................................New Jersey gross income tax, consistent with preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from Federal as well as New
Van Kampen Merritt New York Value Municipal York State and New York City income taxes, consistent with
Income Trust..................................................preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Ohio Value Municipal Income High level of current income exempt from Federal and Ohio income
Trust.........................................................taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
Van Kampen Merritt Pennsylvania Value Municipal High level of current income exempt from Federal and Pennsylvania
Income Trust.................................................income taxes, consistent with preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from federal income tax,
Van Kampen Merritt Municipal Opportunity Trust II..............consistent with preservation of capital
High level of current income exempt from federal income tax,
consistent with preservation of capital. The Fund seeks to offer
its common shareholders the opportunity to own securities exempt
Van Kampen Merritt Florida Municipal Opportunity Trust ........from Florida intangible personal property taxes
Provide common shareholders with a high level of current income
exempt from federal income tax, consistent with preservation of
Van Kampen Merritt Advantage Municipal Income Trust II.........capital
To provide common shareholders with a high level of current income
exempt from federal income tax, consistent with preservation of
Van Kampen Merritt Select Sector Municipal Trust...............capital
</TABLE>
If the Sponsor shall fail to perform any of its duties under the Trust
Agreement or become incapable of acting or become bankrupt or its affairs are
taken over by public authorities, then the Trustee may (i) appoint a successor
Sponsor at rates of compensation deemed by the Trustee to be reasonable and
not exceeding amounts prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
(ii) terminate the Trust Agreement and liquidate the Fund as provided therein
or (iii) continue to act as Trustee without terminating the Trust Agreement.
All costs and expenses incurred in creating and establishing the Fund,
including the cost of the initial preparation, printing and execution of the
Trust Agreement and the certificates, legal and accounting expenses,
advertising and selling expenses, expenses of the Trustee, initial evaluation
fees and other out-of-pocket expenses have been borne by the Sponsor at no
cost to the Fund.
Compensation of Sponsor and Evaluator. The Sponsor will not receive any fees
in connection with its activities relating to the Fund. However, American
Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment
Advisory Corp., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation of the Sponsor,
will receive an annual supervisory fee as indicated under "Summary of
Essential Financial Information"for providing portfolio supervisory
services for the Fund. Such fee (which is based on the number of Units
outstanding in each Trust on January 1 of each year) may exceed the actual
costs of providing such supervisory services for this Fund, but at no time
will the total amount received for portfolio supervisory services rendered to
Insured Municipals Income Trust, 1st Insured Multi-Series and subsequent
series and to any other unit investment trusts sponsored by the Sponsor for
which the Evaluator provides portfolio supervisory services in any calendar
year exceed the aggregate cost to the Evaluator of supplying such services in
such year. In addition, the Evaluator shall receive an annual evaluation fee
as indicated under "Summary of Essential Financial Information"for
regularly evaluating each Trust's portfolio. Both of the foregoing fees may be
increased without approval of the Unitholders by amounts not exceeding
proportionate increases under the category "All Services Less Rent of
Shelter"in the Consumer Price Index published by the United States
Department of Labor or, if such category is no longer published, in a
comparable category. The Sponsor and the Underwriters will receive sales
commissions and may realize other profits (or losses) in connection with the
sale of Units and the deposit of the Securities as described under "
General--Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation"below.
Trustee. The Trustee is The Bank of New York, a trust company organized under
the laws of New York. The Bank of New York has its offices at 101 Barclay
Street, New York, New York 10286 (800) 221-7668. The Bank of New York is
subject to supervision and examination by the Superintendent of Banks of the
State of New York and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to
the extent permitted by law.
The duties of the Trustee are primarily ministerial in nature. It did not
participate in the selection of Bonds for the portfolios of any of the Trusts.
In accordance with the Trust Agreement, the Trustee shall keep proper books of
record and account of all transactions at its office for the Fund. Such
records shall include the name and address of, and the certificates issued by
the Fund to, every Unitholder of the Fund. Such books and records shall be
open to inspection by any Unitholder at all reasonable times during the usual
business hours. The Trustee shall make such annual or other reports as may
from time to time be required under any applicable state or Federal statute,
rule or regulation (see "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Reports
Provided"). The Trustee is required to keep a certified copy or duplicate
original of the Trust Agreement on file in its office available for inspection
at all reasonable times during the usual business hours by any Unitholder,
together with a current list of the Securities held in the Fund.
Under the Trust Agreement, the Trustee or any successor trustee may resign and
be discharged of the trusts created by the Trust Agreement by executing an
instrument in writing and filing the same with the Sponsor. The Trustee or
successor trustee must mail a copy of the notice of resignation to all Fund
Unitholders then of record, not less than 60 days before the date specified in
such notice when such resignation is to take effect. The Sponsor upon
receiving notice of such resignation is obligated to appoint a successor
trustee promptly. If, upon such resignation, no successor trustee has been
appointed and has accepted the appointment within 30 days after notification,
the retiring Trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the
appointment of a successor. The Sponsor may remove the Trustee and appoint a
successor trustee as provided in the Trust Agreement at any time with or
without cause. Notice of such removal and appointment shall be mailed to each
Unitholder by the Sponsor. Upon execution of a written acceptance of such
appointment by such successor trustee, all the rights, powers, duties and
obligations of the original trustee shall vest in the successor. The
resignation or removal of a Trustee becomes effective only when the successor
trustee accepts its appointment as such or when a court of competent
jurisdiction appoints a successor trustee.
Any corporation into which a Trustee may be merged or with which it may be
consolidated, or any corporation resulting from any merger or consolidation to
which a Trustee shall be a party, shall be the successor trustee. The Trustee
must be a banking corporation organized under the laws of the United States or
any state and having at all times an aggregate capital, surplus and undivided
profits of not less than $5,000,000.
Trustee's Fee. For its services the Trustee will receive a fee based on the
aggregate outstanding principal amount of Securities in each Trust as of the
opening of business on January 2 and July 2 of each year as set forth under
"Per Unit Information"for the applicable Trust. During the first year
the Trustee may agree to reduce its fee (and to the extent necessary pay
miscellaneous expenses of a Trust) as stated under "Per Unit
Information"for the applicable Trust. The Trustee's fees are payable
monthly on or before the fifteenth day of each month from the Interest Account
of each Trust to the extent funds are available and then from the Principal
Account of each Trust, with such payments being based on each Trust's portion
of such expenses. Since the Trustee has the use of the funds being held in the
Principal and Interest Accounts for future distributions, payment of expenses
and redemptions and since such Accounts are non-interest bearing to
Unitholders, the Trustee benefits thereby. Part of the Trustee's compensation
for its services to each Trust is expected to result from the use of these
funds. Such fees may be increased without approval of the Unitholders by
amounts not exceeding proportionate increases under the category "All
Services Less Rent of Shelter"in the Consumer Price Index published by
the United States Department of Labor or, if such category is no longer
published, in a comparable category. The Trustee's fees will not be increased
in future years in order to make up any reduction in the Trustee's fees
described under "Per Unit Information"for the applicable Trust. For a
discussion of the services rendered by the Trustee pursuant to its obligations
under the Trust Agreement, see "Unitholder Explanations--Public
Offering--Reports Provided"and "Trustee"above.
Portfolio Administration. The Trustee is empowered to sell, for the purpose
of redeeming Units tendered by any Unitholder, and for the payment of expenses
for which funds may not be available, such of the Bonds designated by the
Evaluator as the Trustee in its sole discretion may deem necessary. The
Evaluator, in designating such Securities, will consider a variety of factors,
including (a) interest rates, (b) market value and (c) marketability. In
connection with the Insured Trusts to the extent that Bonds are sold which are
current in payment of principal and interest in order to meet redemption
requests and defaulted Bonds are retained in the portfolio in order to
preserve the related insurance protection applicable to said Bonds, the
overall quality of the Bonds remaining in such Trust's portfolio will tend to
diminish. Except as described in this section and in certain other unusual
circumstances for which it is determined by the Trustee to be in the best
interests of the Unitholders or if there is no alternative, the Trustee is not
empowered to sell Bonds from an Insured Trust which are in default in payment
of principal or interest or in significant risk of such default and for which
value has been attributed for the insurance obtained by such Insured Trust.
Because of such restrictions on the Trustee under certain circumstances, the
Sponsor may seek a full or partial suspension of the right of Unitholders to
redeem their Units in an Insured Trust. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Redemption of Units". The Sponsor is
empowered, but not obligated, to direct the Trustee to dispose of Bonds in the
event of an advanced refunding.
The Sponsor is required to instruct the Trustee to reject any offer made by an
issuer of any of the Securities to issue new obligations in exchange or
substitution for any Security pursuant to a refunding or refinancing plan,
except that the Sponsor may instruct the Trustee to accept or reject such an
offer or to take any other action with respect thereto as the Sponsor may deem
proper if (1) the issuer is in default with respect to such Security or (2) in
the written opinion of the Sponsor the issuer will probably default with
respect to such Security in the reasonably foreseeable future. Any obligation
so received in exchange or substitution will be held by the Trustee subject to
the terms and conditions of the Trust Agreement to the same extent as
Securities originally deposited thereunder. Within five days after the deposit
of obligations in exchange or substitution for underlying Securities, the
Trustee is required to give notice thereof to each Unitholder of the Trust
thereby affected, identifying the Securities eliminated and the Securities
substituted therefor. Except as stated herein and under "Unitholder
Explanations--Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts"regarding the
substitution of Replacement Bonds for Failed Bonds, the acquisition by the
Fund of any securities other than the Securities initially deposited is not
permitted.
If any default in the payment of principal or interest on any Security occurs
and no provision for payment is made therefor within 30 days, the Trustee is
required to notify the Sponsor thereof. If the Sponsor fails to instruct the
Trustee to sell or to hold such Security within 30 days after notification by
the Trustee to the Sponsor of such default, the Trustee may in its discretion
sell the defaulted Security and not be liable for any depreciation or loss
thereby incurred.
Sponsor Purchases of Units. The Trustee shall notify the Sponsor of any tender
of Units for redemption. If the Sponsor's bid in the secondary market at that
time equals or exceeds the Redemption Price per Unit, it may purchase such
Units by notifying the Trustee before the close of business on the second
succeeding business day and by making payment therefor to the Unitholder not
later than the day on which the Units would otherwise have been redeemed by
the Trustee. Units held by the Sponsor may be tendered to the Trustee for
redemption as any other Units.
The offering price of any Units acquired by the Sponsor will be in accord with
the Public Offering Price described in the then currently effective prospectus
describing such Units. Any profit resulting from the resale of such Units will
belong to the Sponsor which likewise will bear any loss resulting from a lower
offering or Redemption Price subsequent to its acquisition of such Units.
Insurance Premiums. The cost of the portfolio insurance obtained by the
respective Trusts, if any, is that amount shown in footnote (5) in "Notes
to Portfolios", so long as such Trust retains the Bonds. Premiums, which
are obligations of each Insured Trust, are payable monthly by the Trustee on
behalf of the respective Trust. As Bonds in the portfolio of an Insured Trust
are redeemed by their respective issuers or are sold by the Trustee, the
amount of the premium will be reduced in respect of those Bonds no longer
owned by and held in such Trust. If the Trustee exercises the right to obtain
permanent insurance, the premiums payable for such permanent insurance will be
paid solely from the proceeds of the sale of the related Bonds. The premiums
for such permanent insurance with respect to each Bond will decline over the
life of the Bond. A Trust does not incur any expense for Preinsured Bond
insurance, since the premium or premiums for such insurance have been paid by
the issuer or the Sponsor prior to the deposit of such Preinsured Bonds in a
Trust. Preinsured Bonds are not additionally insured by an Insured Trust.
Miscellaneous Expenses. The following additional charges are or may be
incurred by the Trusts: (a) fees of the Trustee for extraordinary services,
(b) expenses of the Trustee (including legal and auditing expenses) and of
counsel designated by the Sponsor, (c) various governmental charges, (d)
expenses and costs of any action taken by the Trustee to protect the Trusts
and the rights and interests of Unitholders, (e) indemnification of the
Trustee for any loss, liability or expenses incurred by it in the
administration of the Fund without negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct
on its part, (f) any special custodial fees payable in connection with the
sale of any of the Bonds in a Trust and (g) expenditures incurred in
contacting Unitholders upon termination of the Trusts.
The fees and expenses set forth herein are payable out of the Trusts. When
such fees and expenses are paid by or owing to the Trustee, they are secured
by a lien on the portfolio or portfolios of the applicable Trust or Trusts. If
the balances in the Interest and Principal Accounts are insufficient to
provide for amounts payable by the Fund, the Trustee has the power to sell
Securities to pay such amounts.
GENERAL
Amendment or Termination. The Sponsor and the Trustee have the power to amend
the Trust Agreement without the consent of any of the Unitholders when such an
amendment is (a) to cure an ambiguity or to correct or supplement any
provision of the Trust Agreement which may be defective or inconsistent with
any other provision contained therein or (b) to make such other provisions as
shall not adversely affect the interest of the Unitholders (as determined in
good faith by the Sponsor and the Trustee), provided that the Trust Agreement
may not be amended to increase the number of Units issuable thereunder or to
permit the deposit or acquisition of securities either in addition to or in
substitution for any of the Securities initially deposited in the Fund, except
for the substitution of certain refunding securities for such Securities. In
the event of any amendment, the Trustee is obligated to notify promptly all
Unitholders of the substance of such amendment.
A Trust may be terminated at any time by consent of Unitholders of 51% of the
Units of such Trust then outstanding or by the Trustee when the value of such
Trust, as shown by any semi-annual evaluation, is less than that indicated
under "Summary of Essential Financial Information". A Trust will be
liquidated by the Trustee in the event that a sufficient number of Units not
yet sold are tendered for redemption by the Underwriters, including the
Sponsor, so that the net worth of such Trust would be reduced to less than 40%
of the initial principal amount of such Trust. If a Trust is liquidated
because of the redemption of unsold Units by the Underwriters, the Sponsor
will refund to each purchaser of Units the entire sales charge paid by such
purchaser. The Trust Agreement provides that each Trust shall terminate upon
the redemption, sale or other disposition of the last Security held in such
Trust, but in no event shall it continue beyond the end of the year preceding
the fiftieth anniversary of the Trust Agreement in the case of a State Trust
(other than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust), or beyond the end
of the year preceding the twentieth anniversary of the Trust Agreement in the
case of IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity and IM-IT Short Intermediate Trusts. In the event of
termination of the Fund or any Trust, written notice thereof will be sent by
the Trustee to each Unitholder of such Trust at his address appearing on the
registration books of the Fund maintained by the Trustee. Within a reasonable
time thereafter the Trustee shall liquidate any Securities then held in such
Trust and shall deduct from the funds of such Trust any accrued costs,
expenses or indemnities provided by the Trust Agreement, including estimated
compensation of the Trustee and costs of liquidation and any amounts required
as a reserve to provide for payment of any applicable taxes or other
governmental charges. The sale of Securities in the Trust upon termination may
result in a lower amount than might otherwise be realized if such sale were
not required at such time. For this reason, among others, the amount realized
by a Unitholder upon termination may be less than the principal amount or par
amount of Securities represented by the Units held by such Unitholder. The
Trustee shall then distribute to each Unitholder his share of the balance of
the Interest and Principal Accounts. With such distribution the Unitholder
shall be furnished a final distribution statement of the amount distributable.
At such time as the Trustee in its sole discretion shall determine that any
amounts held in reserve are no longer necessary, it shall make distribution
thereof to Unitholders in the same manner.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with final distributions to
Unitholders of an Insured Trust, it should be noted that because the portfolio
insurance obtained by an Insured Trust is applicable only while Bonds so
insured are held by such Trust, the price to be received by such Trust upon
the disposition of any such Bond which is in default, by reason of nonpayment
of principal or interest, will not reflect any value based on such insurance.
Therefore, in connection with any liquidation, it shall not be necessary for
the Trustee to, and the Trustee does not currently intend to, dispose of any
Bond or Bonds if retention of such Bond or Bonds, until due, shall be deemed
to be in the best interest of Unitholders, including, but not limited to,
situations in which a Bond or Bonds so insured are in default and situations
in which a Bond or Bonds so insured have deteriorated market prices resulting
from a significant risk of default. Since the Preinsured Bonds will reflect
the value of the related insurance, it is the present intention of the Sponsor
not to direct the Trustee to hold any of such Preinsured Bonds after the date
of termination. All proceeds received, less applicable expenses, from
insurance on defaulted Bonds not disposed of at the date of termination will
ultimately be distributed to Unitholders of record as of such date of
termination as soon as practicable after the date such defaulted Bond or Bonds
become due and applicable insurance proceeds have been received by the
Trustee.
Limitation on Liabilities. The Sponsor, the Evaluator and the Trustee shall be
under no liability to Unitholders for taking any action or for refraining from
taking any action in good faith pursuant to the Trust Agreement, or for errors
in judgment, but shall be liable only for their own willful misfeasance, bad
faith or gross negligence in the performance of their duties or by reason of
their reckless disregard of their obligations and duties hereunder. The
Trustee shall not be liable for depreciation or loss incurred by reason of the
sale by the Trustee of any of the Securities. In the event of the failure of
the Sponsor to act under the Trust Agreement, the Trustee may act thereunder
and shall not be liable for any action taken by it in good faith under the
Trust Agreement.
The Trustee shall not be liable for any taxes or other governmental charges
imposed upon or in respect of the Securities or upon the interest thereon or
upon it as Trustee under the Trust Agreement or upon or in respect of the Fund
which the Trustee may be required to pay under any present or future law of
the United States of America or of any other taxing authority having
jurisdiction. In addition, the Trust Agreement contains other customary
provisions limiting the liability of the Trustee.
The Trustee, Sponsor and Unitholders may rely on any evaluation furnished by
the Evaluator and shall have no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
Determinations by the Evaluator under the Trust Agreement shall be made in
good faith upon the basis of the best information available to it; provided,
however, that the Evaluator shall be under no liability to the Trustee,
Sponsor or Unitholders for errors in judgment. This provision shall not
protect the Evaluator in any case of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross
negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties.
Unit Distribution. During the initial offering period, Units will be
distributed to the public by Underwriters, broker-dealers and others (see "
Underwriting") at the Public Offering Price, plus Purchased Interest, plus
interest accrued but unpaid from the First Settlement Date to the date of
settlement as described above under "Unitholder Explanations--Purchased
and Accrued Interest--Accrued Interest". Upon the completion of the
initial offering, Units repurchased in the secondary market, if any, may be
offered by this Prospectus at the secondary Public Offering Price, plus
Purchased Interest plus interest accrued to the date of settlement in the
manner described.
The Sponsor intends to qualify the Units for sale in a number of states.
Broker-dealers or others will be allowed a concession or agency commission in
connection with the distribution of Units during the initial offering period
of $20.00 per Unit for less than 100 Units, $22.00 per Unit for any single
transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $21.50 per Unit for any single transaction of
250 to 499 Units, $24.50 per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999
Units and $24.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units of
a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust, and in the case of a State Trust
(other than a State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust) $30.00 per Unit for
less than 100 Units, $36.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249
Units, $38.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $39.00
per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $39.00 per Unit
for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units, provided that such Units
are acquired either from the Sponsor (in the case of dealer transactions) or
through the Sponsor (in the case of transactions involving brokers or others).
The increased concession or agency commission is a result of the discount
given to purchasers for quantity purchases. See "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General". Certain commercial banks are
making Units of the Fund available to their customers on an agency basis. A
portion of the sales charge paid by these customers (equal to the agency
commission referred to above) is retained by or remitted to the banks. Under
the Glass-Steagall Act, banks are prohibited from underwriting Units of the
Fund; however, the Glass-Steagall Act does permit certain agency transactions
and the banking regulators have not indicated that these particular agency
transactions are not permitted under such Act. In addition, state securities
laws on this issue may differ from the interpretations of federal law
expressed herein and banks and financial institutions may be required to
register as dealers pursuant to state law. Any quantity discount (see "
Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--General") provided to investors
will be borne by the selling dealer or agent. For secondary market
transactions, such concession or agency commission will amount to 70% of the
applicable sales charge as determined using the table found in "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering".
To facilitate the handling of transactions during the initial offering period,
sales of Units shall normally be limited to transactions involving a minimum
of five Units. Further purchases may be made in multiples of one Unit. The
minimum purchase in the secondary market will be one Unit.
The Sponsor reserves the right to reject, in whole or in part, any order for
the purchase of Units and to change the amount of the concession or agency
commission to dealers and others from time to time. See "Underwriting".
Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation. The Underwriters will receive a gross
sales commission equal to that percentage of the Public Offering Price of the
Units (excluding Purchased Interest) as indicated under "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price"less any reduced sales
charges for quantity purchases as described under "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General".
The Sponsor will receive from the Underwriters the excess of such gross sales
commission over $35.00, $29.00, $27.00, $22.00, $22.00 and $35.00 per Unit of
any IM-IT, IM-IT Limited Maturity, IM-IT Intermediate, IM-IT Short
Intermediate, State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust and other Insured
Trusts, respectively, as of the Date of Deposit. In connection with quantity
sales to purchasers of any State Trust (other than a State Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Trust) the Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor
commissions totalling $37.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249
Units, $39.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $40.00
per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $39.00 per Unit
for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units. In connection with quantity
sales to purchasers of any State Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust the
Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor commissions totalling $23.00 per
Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249 Units, $23.00 per Unit for any
single transaction of 250 to 499 Units, $24.75 per Unit for any single
transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $24.00 per Unit for any single transaction
of 1,000 or more Units. The Sponsor and First Investors Corporation ("
First Investors") have entered into an agreement under which First
Investors will receive an additional $5.00 per Unit in connection with a
minimum commitment of 17.5% of the total Units of the New York IM-IT Trust,
provided that the New York IM-IT Trust does not exceed 10,000 Units. If the
New York IM-IT Trust exceeds 10,000 Units, First Investors will receive an
additional $5.00 per Unit if First Investors underwrites the lesser of 3,000
Units or 20% of the New York IM-IT Trust. In addition, the Sponsor has entered
into agreements with Advest, Inc. ("Advest") and Gruntal & Co., Inc.
("Gruntal") whereby Advest and Gruntal will receive an additional
$2.00 per Unit in connection with a minimum commitment of 1,500 Units of any
New York IM-IT Trust. Also, the Sponsor will receive from the Managing
Underwriters of the New York IM-IT Trust (who underwrite 15% of the Trust or
1,000 Units of the Trust, whichever is greater) the excess of such gross sales
commission over $38.00 per Unit of the Trust, as of the Date of Deposit. Also,
any such Managing Underwriter that sells a total of 25% or 1,500 Units,
whichever is greater, of the New York IM-IT Trust will receive an additional
$2.00 per each such Unit In connection with quantity sales to purchasers of
any Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust the Underwriters will receive from the Sponsor
commissions totalling $35.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 100 to 249
Units, $36.00 per Unit for any single transaction of 250 to 499 units, $37.00
per Unit for any single transaction of 500 to 999 Units and $38.00 per Unit
for any single transaction of 1,000 or more Units. In addition, any
Underwriter that sells a total of 25% or 1,500 Units, whichever is greater, of
any Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust will receive an additional $2.00 per each such
Unit. See "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--General."
Further, each Underwriter who underwrites 1,000 or more Units in any Trust
will receive additional compensation from the Sponsor of $1.00 for each Unit
it underwrites. In addition, the Sponsor and certain of the Underwriters will
realize a profit or the Sponsor will sustain a loss, as the case may be, as a
result of the difference between the price paid for the Securities by the
Sponsor and the cost of such Securities to a Trust (which is based on the
determination by Interactive Data Services, Inc. of the aggregate offering
price of the underlying Securities in such Trust on the Date of Deposit). See
"Underwriting"and "Portfolio"for the applicable Trust and
"Notes to Portfolios". The Sponsor and the Underwriters may also
realize profits or sustain losses with respect to Securities deposited in each
Trust which were acquired by the Sponsor from underwriting syndicates of which
they were members. The Sponsor has participated as sole underwriter or as
manager or as a member of the underwriting syndicates from which none of the
aggregate principal amount of the Securities in the portfolios of the Fund
were acquired. The Underwriters may further realize additional profit or loss
during the initial offering period as a result of the possible fluctuations in
the market value of the Securities in each Trust after the Date of Deposit,
since all proceeds received from purchasers of Units (excluding dealer
concessions or agency commissions allowed, if any) will be retained by the
Underwriters. Affiliates of an Underwriter are entitled to the same dealer
concessions or agency commissions that are available to the Underwriter.
As stated under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Market for
Units", the Sponsor intends to, and certain of the other Underwriters may,
maintain a secondary market for the Units of the Fund. In so maintaining a
market, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses in
the amount of any difference between the price at which Units are purchased
and the price at which Units are resold (which price is based on the bid
prices of the Securities in such Trust and includes a sales charge). In
addition, such person or persons will also realize profits or sustain losses
resulting from a redemption of such repurchased Units at a price above or
below the purchase price for such Units, respectively.
OTHER MATTERS
Legal Opinions. The legality of the Units offered hereby and certain matters
relating to Federal, Florida and Minnesota tax law have been passed upon by
Chapman and Cutler, 111 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603, as
counsel for the Sponsor. Orick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has acted as special
counsel to the Fund for California tax matters. Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul has
acted as special counsel to the Fund for Pennsylvania tax matters. Tanner
Propp & Farber has acted as counsel for the Trustee and as special counsel to
the Fund for New York tax matters. None of the special counsel for the Fund
has expressed any opinion regarding the completeness or materiality of any
matters contained in this Prospectus other than the tax opinion set forth
under "Tax Status"relating to the Trust for which it has provided an
opinion.
Independent Certified Public Accountants. The statements of condition and the
related securities portfolios at the Date of Deposit included in this
Prospectus have been audited by Grant Thornton, independent certified public
accountants, as set forth in their report in this prospectus, and are included
herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
FEDERAL TAX STATUS
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the Sponsor, under existing
law:
Each Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation for Federal income
tax purposes and interest and accrued original issue discount on Bonds which
is excludable from gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
"Code") will retain its status when distributed to Unitholders, except
to the extent such interest is subject to the alternative minimum tax, an
additional tax on branches of foreign corporations and the environmental tax
(the "Superfund Tax"), as noted below;
Each Unitholder is considered to be the owner of a pro rata portion of the
respective Trust under subpart E, subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code and
will have a taxable event when such Trust disposes of a Bond, or when the
Unitholder redeems or sells his Units. Unitholders must reduce the tax basis
of their Units for their share of accrued interest received by the respective
Trust, if any, on Bonds delivered after the Unitholders pay for their Units to
the extent that such interest accrued on such Bonds during the period from the
Unitholder's settlement date to the date such Bonds are delivered to the
respective Trust and, consequently, such Unitholders may have an increase in
taxable gain or reduction in capital loss upon the disposition of such Units.
Gain or loss upon the sale or redemption of Units is measured by comparing the
proceeds of such sale or redemption with the adjusted basis of the Units. If
the Trustee disposes of Bonds (whether by sale, payment on maturity,
redemption or otherwise), gain or loss is recognized to the Unitholder. The
amount of any such gain or loss is measured by comparing the Unitholder's pro
rata share of the total proceeds from such disposition with the Unitholder's
basis for his or her fractional interest in the asset disposed of. In the case
of a Unitholder who purchases Units, such basis (before adjustment for earned
original issue discount and amortized bond premium, if any) is determined by
apportioning the cost of the Units among each of the Trust assets ratably
according to value as of the date of acquisition of the Units. The tax cost
reduction requirements of the Code relating to amortization of bond premium
may, under some circumstances, result in the Unitholder realizing a taxable
gain when his Units are sold or redeemed for an amount equal to his original
cost;
Any proceeds paid under an insurance policy or policies dated the Date of
Deposit, issued to an Insured Trust by AMBAC Indemnity, Financial Guaranty or
a combination thereof with respect to the Bonds which represent maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have
been so excludable if paid by the issuer of the defaulted obligations provided
that, at the time such policies are purchased, the amounts paid for such
policies are reasonable, customary and consistent with the reasonable
expectation that the issuer of the obligations, rather than the insurer, will
pay debt service on the obligations; and
Any proceeds paid under individual policies obtained by issuers of Bonds which
represent maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will
be excludable from Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such
interest would have been excludable if paid in the normal course by the issuer
of the defaulted obligations provided that, at the time such policies are
purchased, the amounts paid for such policies are reasonable, customary and
consistent with the reasonable expectation that the issuer of the obligations,
rather than the insurer, will pay debt service on the obligations.
Sections 1288 and 1272 of the Code provide a complex set of rules governing
the accrual of original issue discount. These rules provide that original
issue discount accrues either on the basis of a constant compound interest
rate or ratably over the term of the Bond, depending on the date the Bond was
issued. In addition, special rules apply if the purchase price of a Bond
exceeds the original issue price plus the amount of original issue discount
which would have previously accrued based upon its issue price (its "
adjusted issue price") to prior owners. The application of these rules
will also vary depending on the value of the Bond on the date a Unitholder
acquires his Units and the price the Unitholder pays for his Units. Investors
with questions regarding these Code sections should consult with their tax
advisers.
"The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993"(the "Tax Act")
subjects tax-exempt bonds to the market discount rules of the Code effective
for bonds purchased after April 30, 1993. In general, market discount is the
amount (if any) by which the stated redemption price at maturity exceeds an
investor's purchase price (except to the extent that such difference, if any,
is attributable to original issue discount not yet accrued). Market discount
can arise based on the price a Trust pays for Bonds or the price a Unitholder
pays for his or her Units. Under the Tax Act, accretion of market discount is
taxable as ordinary income; under prior law the accretion had been treated as
capital gain. Market discount that accretes while a Trust holds a Bond would
be recognized as ordinary income by the Unitholders when principal payments
are received on the Bond, upon sale or at redemption (including early
redemption), or upon the sale or redemption of his or her Units, unless a
Unitholder elects to include market discount in taxable income as it accrues.
The market discount rules are complex and Unitholders should consult their tax
advisers regarding these rules and their application.
In the case of certain corporations, the alternative minimum tax and the
Superfund Tax for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986 depends upon
the corporation's alternative minimum taxable income, which is the
corporation's taxable income with certain adjustments. One of the adjustment
items used in computing the alternative minimum taxable income and the
Superfund Tax of a corporation (other than an S Corporation, Regulated
Investment Company, Real Estate Investment Trust, or REMIC) is an amount equal
to 75% of the excess of such corporation's "adjusted current earnings"
over an amount equal to its alternative minimum taxable income (before such
adjustment item and the alternative tax net operating loss deduction). "
Adjusted current earnings"includes all tax exempt interest, including
interest on all of the Bonds in the Fund. Unitholders are urged to consult
their tax advisers with respect to the particular tax consequences to them
including the corporate alternative minimum tax, the Superfund Tax and the
branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code.
Counsel for the Sponsor has also advised that under Section 265 of the Code,
interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry Units of a
Trust is not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. The Internal Revenue
Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need not be directly
traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units (however, these rules generally
do not apply to interest paid on indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve
a personal residence). Also, under Section 265 of the Code, certain financial
institutions that acquire Units would generally not be able to deduct any of
the interest expense attributable to ownership of such Units. Investors with
questions regarding this issue should consult with their tax advisers.
In the case of certain of the Bonds in the Fund, the opinions of bond counsel
indicate that interest on such Bonds received by a "substantial user"
of the facilities being financed with the proceeds of these Bonds, or persons
related thereto, for periods while such Bonds are held by such a user or
related person, will not be excludible from Federal gross income, although
interest on such Bonds received by others would be excludible from Federal
gross income. "Substantial user"and "related person"are
defined under U.S. Treasury Regulations. Any person who believes that he or
she may be a "substantial user"or a "related person"as so
defined should contact his or her tax adviser.
In the opinion of Tanner Propp & Farber, special counsel to the Fund for New
York tax matters, under existing law, the Fund and each Trust are not
associations taxable as corporations and the income of each Trust will be
treated as the income of the Unitholders under the income tax laws of the
State and City of New York.
All statements of law in the Prospectus concerning exclusion from gross income
for Federal, state or other tax purposes are the opinions of counsel and are
to be so construed.
At the respective times of issuance of the Bonds, opinions relating to the
validity thereof and to the exclusion of interest thereon from Federal gross
income are rendered by bond counsel to the respective issuing authorities.
Neither the Sponsor nor Chapman and Cutler has made any special review for the
Fund of the proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds or of the basis
for such opinions.
In the case of corporations, the alternative tax rate applicable to long-term
capital gains is 35%, effective for long-term capital gains realized in
taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1993. For taxpayers other than
corporations, net capital gains are subject to a maximum marginal stated tax
rate of 28%. However, it should be noted that legislative proposals are
introduced from time to time that affect tax rates and could affect relative
differences at which ordinary income and capital gains are taxed. Under the
Code, taxpayers must disclose to the Internal Revenue Service the amount of
tax-exempt interest earned during the year.
Section 86 of the Code, in general, provides that 50% of Social Security
benefits are includible in gross income to the extent that the sum of "
modified adjusted gross income"plus 50% of the Social Security benefits
received exceeds a "base amount". The base amount is $25,000 for
unmarried taxpayers, $32,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return and
zero for married taxpayers who do not live apart at all times during the
taxable year and who file separate returns. Modified adjusted gross income is
adjusted gross income determined without regard to certain otherwise allowable
deductions and exclusions from gross income and by including tax-exempt
interest. To the extent that Social Security benefits are includible in gross
income, they will be treated as any other item of gross income.
In addition, under the Tax Act, for taxable years beginning after December 31,
1993, up to 85% of Social Security benefits are includible in gross income to
the extent that the sum of "modified adjusted gross income"plus 50%
of Social Security benefits received exceeds an "adjusted base amount."
The adjusted base amount is $34,000 for unmarried taxpayers, $44,000 for
married taxpayers filing a joint return, and zero for married taxpayers who do
not live apart at all times during the taxable year and who file separate
returns.
Although tax-exempt interest is included in modified adjusted gross income
solely for the purpose of determining what portion, if any, of Social Security
benefits will be included in gross income, no tax-exempt interest, including
that received from a Trust, will be subject to tax. A taxpayer whose adjusted
gross income already exceeds the base amount or the adjusted base amount must
include 50% or 85%, respectively, of his Social Security benefits in gross
income whether or not he receives any tax-exempt interest. A taxpayer whose
modified adjusted gross income (after inclusion of tax-exempt interest) does
not exceed the base amount need not include any Social Security benefits in
gross income.
For a discussion of the state tax status of income earned on Units of a Trust,
see "Tax Status"for the applicable Trust. Except as noted therein,
the exemption of interest on state and local obligations for Federal income
tax purposes discussed above does not necessarily result in exemption under
the income or other tax laws of any State or City. The laws of the several
States vary with respect to the taxation of such obligations.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS
Standard & Poor's Corporation. A Standard & Poor's Corporation ("Standard
& Poor's") corporate or municipal bond rating is a current assessment of
the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific debt obligation.
This assessment of creditworthiness may take into consideration obligors such
as guarantors, insurers or lessees.
The bond rating is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a security,
inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price.
The ratings are based on current information furnished to Standard & Poor's by
the issuer and obtained by Standard & Poor's from other sources it considers
reliable. The ratings may be changed, suspended or withdrawn as a result of
changes in, or unavailability of, such information.
The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations:
I. Likelihood of default--capacity and willingness of the obligor as to the
timely payment of interest and repayment of principal in accordance with the
terms of the obligation.
II. Nature of and provisions of the obligation.
III. Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the
event of bankruptcy, reorganization or other arrangements under the laws of
bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights.
AAA--This is the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's to a debt
obligation and indicates an extremely strong capacity to pay principal and
interest.
AA--Bonds rated AA also qualify as high-quality debt obligations. Capacity to
pay principal and interest is very strong, and in the majority of instances
they differ from AAA issues only in small degree.
A--Bonds rated A have a strong capacity to pay principal and interest,
although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes
in circumstances and economic conditions.
BBB--Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate
protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances
are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay
principal for debt in this category than in higher rated categories.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): To provide more detailed indications of credit quality,
the ratings from "AA"to "BBB"may be modified by the addition
of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating
categories.
Provisional Ratings: A provisional rating ("p") assumes the successful
completion of the project being financed by the issuance of the bonds being
rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements is largely or
entirely dependent upon the successful and timely completion of the project.
This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to
completion, makes no comment on the likelihood of, or the risk of default upon
failure of, such completion. Accordingly, the investor should exercise his own
judgment with respect to such likelihood and risk.
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. A brief description of the applicable Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") rating symbols and their meanings
follows:
Aaa--Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be the best quality. They carry
the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as "
gilt edge". Interest payments are protected by a large, or by an
exceptionally stable, margin and principal is secure. While the various
protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized
are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues.
With the occasional exception of oversupply in a few specific instances, the
safety of obligations of this class is so absolute that their market value is
affected solely by money market fluctuations.
Aa--Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all
standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known
as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins
of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuations of
protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements
present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa
securities. These Aa bonds are high grade, their market value virtually immune
to all but money market influences, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
A--Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and
are to be considered as higher medium grade obligations. Factors giving
security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may
be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the
future. The market value of A-rated bonds may be influenced to some degree by
credit circumstances during a sustained period of depressed business
conditions. During periods of normalcy, bonds of this quality frequently move
in parallel with Aaa and Aa obligations, with the occasional exception of
oversupply in a few specific instances.
Baa--Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade obligations;
i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments
and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective
elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great
length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in
fact have speculative characteristics as well.
Moody's bond rating symbols may contain numerical modifiers of a generic
rating classification. The modifier 1 indicates that the bond ranks at the
high end of its category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and
the modifier 3 indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic
rating category.
Con--Bonds for which the security depends upon the completion of some act or
the fulfillment of some condition are rated conditionally. These are bonds
secured by (a) earnings of projects under construction, (b) earnings of
projects unseasoned in operating experience, (c) rentals which begin when
facilities are completed, or (d) payments to which some other limiting
condition attaches. Parenthetical rating denotes probable credit stature upon
completion of construction or elimination of basis of condition.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of Van Kampen Merritt Inc. and the Unitholders of
Insured Municipals Income Trust,168th Insured Multi-Series (California IM-IT,
Florida IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity,
New York IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts):
We have audited the accompanying statements of condition and the related
portfolios of Insured Municipals Income Trust,168th Insured Multi-Series
(California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity, New York IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts) as of October
27, 1994. The statements of condition and portfolios are the responsibility of
the Sponsor. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on such financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our
procedures included confirmation of irrevocable letters of credit deposited to
purchase tax-exempt securities by correspondence with the Trustee. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by the Sponsor, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Insured Municipals Income
Trust,168th Insured Multi-Series (California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT, Minnesota
IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity, New York IM-IT and
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts) as of October 27, 1994, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Chicago, Illinois GRANT THORNTON
October 27, 1994
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
168th INSURED MULTI-SERIES
Statements of Condition
As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES California Florida Minnesota
IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Contracts to purchase tax-exempt securities <F1><F2><F4>... $ 2,882,320 $ 2,879,026 $ 2,942,217
Accrued interest to the First Settlement Date <F1><F4>..... 25,184 32,681 50,700
Total...................................................... $ 2,907,504 $ 2,911,707 $ 2,992,917
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability-- ...............................................
Accrued interest payable to Sponsor <F1><F4> $ -- $ 2,042 $ 19,510
Interest of Unitholders-- .................................
Cost to investors <F3>..................................... 3,056,000 3,058,000 3,125,000
Less: Gross underwriting commission <F3>................... 148,496 148,335 151,593
Net interest to Unitholders <F1><F3><F4>................... 2,907,504 2,909,665 2,973,407
Total...................................................... $ 2,907,504 $ 2,911,707 $ 2,992,917
<FN>
<F1>The aggregate value of the Securities listed under "Portfolio"for
each Trust herein, and their cost to such Trust are the same. The value of the
Securities is determined by Interactive Data Services, Inc. on the bases set
forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price"
. The contracts to purchase tax-exempt Securities are collateralized by
irrevocable letters of credit which have been deposited with the Trustee in
and for the following amounts:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accrued
Principal Offering Interest to
Amount of Amount of Price of Expected
Letter of Bonds Under Bonds Under Delivery
Credit Contracts Contracts Dates
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California IM-IT Trust....$ 2,907,371.$ 3,050,000.$ 2,882,320.$...25,051
Florida IM-IT Trust.......$ 2,911,173.$ 2,990,000.$ 2,879,026.$...32,147
Minnesota IM-IT Trust.....$ 2,992,621.$ 3,125,000.$ 2,942,217.$...50,404
<F2>Insurance coverage providing for timely payment, when due, of all principal
and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been obtained either by
such Trusts, by a prior owner of the Bonds, by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds or by the issuers of the Bonds involved. Such insurance
does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the Units.
The insurance obtained by the Insured Trusts is effective only while Bonds
thus insured are held in such Trusts. Neither the bid nor offering prices of
the underlying Bonds or of the Units, absent situations in which bonds are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default, include value, if any, attributable to the insurance obtained by such
Trusts.
<F3>The aggregate public offering price (exclusive of interest) and the aggregate
sales charge are computed on the bases set forth under "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price"and "Trust
Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Profits"and assume all
single transactions involve less than 100 Units. For single transactions
involving 100 or more Units, the sales charge is reduced (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General") resulting in an equal reduction
in both the Cost to investors and the Gross underwriting commission while the
Net interest to Unitholders remains unchanged.
<F4>Accrued interest on the underlying Securities represents the interest accrued
as of the First Settlement Date from the later of the last payment date on the
Securities or the date of issuance thereof. The Trustee may advance to the
Trust a portion of the accrued interest on the underlying Securities for
distribution to the Sponsor as the Unitholder of record as of the First
Settlement Date. A portion of the accrued interest ("Purchased
Interest") on the underlying Securities, as indicated under "Summary
of Essential Financial Information", is payable by investors and is
included in the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest is the difference
between Accrued interest to the First Settlement Date and Accrued interest
payable to Sponsor.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
168th INSURED MULTI-SERIES
Statements of Condition (Continued)
As of October 27, 1994
<CAPTION>
New York
IM-IT
Intermediate
INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES Laddered New York Pennsylvania
Maturity Trust IM-IT Trust IM-IT Trust
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Contracts to purchase tax-exempt securities <F1><F2><F4>... $ 2,914,678 $ 2,911,081 $ 2,921,586
Accrued interest to the First Settlement Date <F1><F4>..... 31,443 53,561 56,201
Total...................................................... $ 2,946,121 $ 2,964,642 $ 2,977,787
LIABILITY AND INTEREST OF UNITHOLDERS
Liability-- ...............................................
Accrued interest payable to Sponsor <F1><F4> $ 6,901 $ 21,632 $ 24,315
Interest of Unitholders-- .................................
Cost to investors <F3>..................................... 3,029,340 3,093,000 3,104,000
Less: Gross underwriting commission <F3>................... 90,120 149,990 150,528
Net interest to Unitholders <F1><F3><F4>................... 2,939,220 2,943,010 2,953,472
Total...................................................... $ 2,946,121 $ 2,964,642 $ 2,977,787
<FN>
<F1>The aggregate value of the Securities listed under "Portfolio"for
each Trust herein, and their cost to such Trust are the same. The value of the
Securities is determined by Interactive Data Services, Inc. on the bases set
forth under "Unitholder Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price"
. The contracts to purchase tax-exempt Securities are collateralized by
irrevocable letters of credit which have been deposited with the Trustee in
and for the following amounts:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accrued
Principal Offering Interest to
Amount of Amount of Price of Expected
Letter of Bonds Under Bonds Under Delivery
Credit Contracts Contracts Dates
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered
Maturity Trust..........................$ 2,944,509 $ 3,000,000 $ 2,914,678 $ 29,831
New York IM-IT Trust.................... $ 2,962,887 $ 3,150,000 $ 2,911,081 $ 51,806
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust................ $ 2,978,106 $ 3,055,000 $ 2,921,586 $ 56,520
<F2>Insurance coverage providing for timely payment, when due, of all principal
and interest on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts has been obtained either by
such Trusts, by a prior owner of the Bonds, by the Sponsor prior to the
deposit of such Bonds or by the issuers of the Bonds involved. Such insurance
does not guarantee the market value of the Bonds or the value of the Units.
The insurance obtained by the Insured Trusts is effective only while Bonds
thus insured are held in such Trusts. Neither the bid nor offering prices of
the underlying Bonds or of the Units, absent situations in which bonds are in
default in payment of principal or interest or in significant risk of such
default, include value, if any, attributable to the insurance obtained by such
Trusts.
<F3>The aggregate public offering price (exclusive of interest) and the aggregate
sales charge are computed on the bases set forth under "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--Offering Price"and "Trust
Administration--General--Sponsor and Underwriter Profits"and assume all
single transactions involve less than 100 Units. For single transactions
involving 100 or more Units, the sales charge is reduced (see "Unitholder
Explanations--Public Offering--General") resulting in an equal reduction
in both the Cost to investors and the Gross underwriting commission while the
Net interest to Unitholders remains unchanged.
<F4>Accrued interest on the underlying Securities represents the interest accrued
as of the First Settlement Date from the later of the last payment date on the
Securities or the date of issuance thereof. The Trustee may advance to the
Trust a portion of the accrued interest on the underlying Securities for
distribution to the Sponsor as the Unitholder of record as of the First
Settlement Date. A portion of the accrued interest ("Purchased
Interest") on the underlying Securities, as indicated under "Summary
of Essential Financial Information", is payable by investors and is
included in the Public Offering Price. Purchased Interest is the difference
between Accrued interest to the First Settlement Date and Accrued interest
payable to Sponsor.
</TABLE>
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN TABLES
As of the date of this prospectus, the following tables show the approximate
taxable estimated current returns for individuals that are equivalent to
tax-exempt estimated current returns under combined Federal and State taxes
(where applicable) using the published Federal and State tax rates (where
applicable) scheduled to be in effect in 1994. They incorporate increased tax
rates for higher income taxpayers that were included in the Revenue
Reconciliation Act of 1993. These tables illustrate approximately what you
would have to earn on taxable investments to equal the tax-exempt estimated
current return in your income tax bracket. For cases in which more than one
State bracket falls within a Federal bracket, the highest State bracket is
combined with the Federal bracket. The combined State and Federal tax rates
shown reflect the fact that State tax payments are currently deductible for
Federal tax purposes. The tables do not show the approximate taxable estimated
current returns for individuals that are subject to the alternative minimum
tax. The taxable equivalent estimated current returns may be somewhat higher
than the equivalent returns indicated in the following tables for those
individuals who have adjusted gross incomes in excess of $111,800. The tables
do not reflect the effect of limitations on itemized deductions and the
deduction for personal exemptions. They were designed to phase out certain
benefits of these deductions for higher income taxpayers. These limitations,
in effect, raise the marginal maximum Federal tax rate to approximately 44
percent for taxpayers filing a joint return and entitled to four personal
exemptions and to approximately 41 percent for taxpayers filing a single
return entitled to only one personal exemption. These limitations are subject
to certain maximums, which depend on the number of exemptions claimed and the
total amount of the taxpayer's itemized deductions. For example, the
limitation on itemized deductions will not cause a taxpayer to lose more than
80% of his allowable itemized deductions, with certain exceptions. See "
Other Matters--Federal Tax Status"for a more detailed discussion of
recent Federal tax legislation, including a discussion of provisions affecting
corporations.
CALIFORNIA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 20.1% 6.88% 7.51% 8.14% 8.76% 9.39% 10.01% 10.64%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 34.7 8.42 9.19 9.95 10.72 11.49 12.25 13.02
91.90 - 140.00 37.4 8.79 9.58 10.38 11.18 11.98 12.78 13.58
55.10 - 115.00 37.9 8.86 9.66 10.47 11.27 12.08 12.88 13.69
115.00 - 214.93 140.00 - 250.00 42.4 9.55 10.42 11.28 12.15 13.02 13.89 14.76
214.93 - 250.00 43 9.65 10.53 11.40 12.28 13.16 14.04 14.91
250.00 - 429.86 45.6 10.11 11.03 11.95 12.87 13.79 14.71 15.63
Over 250.00 Over 429.86 46.2 10.22 11.15 12.08 13.01 13.94 14.87 15.80
</TABLE>
*The State tax rates assumed do not take into account possible adjustment of
tax brackets based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. The table reflects
California income tax laws that increase State income tax rates for high
income taxpayers. However, the table does not reflect the limitation on
itemized deductions and the phase out of the benefit for the personal
exemption credit and the dependent exemption credit that are imposed by the
California income tax laws in a manner similar to Federal tax law.
FLORIDA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 15% 6.47% 7.06% 7.65% 8.24% 8.82% 9.41% 10.00%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 28 7.64 8.33 9.03 9.72 10.42 11.11 11.81
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 31 7.97 8.70 9.42 10.14 10.87 11.59 12.32
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 36 8.59 9.38 10.16 10.94 11.72 12.50 13.28
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 39.6 9.11 9.93 10.76 11.59 12.42 13.25 14.07
</TABLE>
* The State of Florida imposes no income tax on individuals; accordingly, the
table reflects only the exemption from Federal income taxes. The table does
not reflect the exemption of Units of the Florida Trust from the State's
intangible tax; accordingly, Florida residents subject to such tax would need
a somewhat higher taxable estimated current return than those shown to equal
the tax-exempt estimated current return of the Florida Trust.
MINNESOTA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 21.8% 7.03% 7.67% 8.31% 8.95% 9.59% 10.23% 10.87%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 34.1 8.35 9.10 9.86 10.62 11.38 12.14 12.90
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 36.9 8.72 9.51 10.30 11.09 11.89 12.68 13.47
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 41.4 9.39 10.24 11.09 11.95 12.80 13.65 14.51
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 44.7 9.95 10.85 11.75 12.66 13.56 14.47 15.37
</TABLE>
NEW YORK INTERMEDIATE LADDERED MATURITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 4 1/2% 5% 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 21.7% 5.75% 6.39% 7.02% 7.66% 8.30% 8.94% 9.58%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 33.7 6.79 7.54 8.30 9.05 9.80 10.56 11.31
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 36.4 7.08 7.86 8.65 9.43 10.22 11.01 11.79
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 41 7.63 8.47 9.32 10.17 11.02 11.86 12.71
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 44.4 8.09 8.99 9.89 10.79 11.69 12.59 13.49
</TABLE>
* Combined Federal and State tax bracket was computed assuming that the
investor is not subject to local income taxes, such as New York City taxes.
Should a Unitholder reside in a locality which imposes an income tax, the
Unitholder's equivalent taxable estimated current return would be greater than
the equivalent taxable estimated current returns indicated in the table. The
table does not reflect the New York State supplemental income tax based upon a
taxpayer's New York State taxable income and new York State adjusted gross
income. This supplemental tax results in an increased marginal State income
tax rate to the extent a taxpayer's New York State adjusted gross income
ranges between $100,000 and $150,000. In addition, the table does not reflect
the amendments to the New York State income tax law that impose limitations on
the deductibility of itemized deductions. The application of the New York
State supplemental income tax and limitation on itemized deductions may result
in a higher combined Federal, State and local tax rate than indicated in the
table.
NEW YORK
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 21.7% 7.02% 7.66% 8.30% 8.94% 9.58% 10.22% 10.86%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 33.7 8.30 9.05 9.80 10.56 11.31 12.07 12.82
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 36.4 8.65 9.43 10.22 11.01 11.79 12.58 13.36
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 41 9.32 10.17 11.02 11.86 12.71 13.56 14.41
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 44.4 9.89 10.79 11.69 12.59 13.49 14.39 15.29
</TABLE>
* Combined Federal and State tax bracket was computed assuming that the
investor is not subject to local income taxes, such as New York City taxes.
Should a Unitholder reside in a locality which imposes an income tax, the
Unitholder's equivalent taxable estimated current return would be greater than
the equivalent taxable estimated current returns indicated in the table. The
table does not reflect the New York State supplemental income tax based upon a
taxpayer's New York State taxable income and new York State adjusted gross
income. This supplemental tax results in an increased marginal State income
tax rate to the extent a taxpayer's New York State adjusted gross income
ranges between $100,000 and $150,000. In addition, the table does not reflect
the amendments to the New York State income tax law that impose limitations on
the deductibility of itemized deductions. The application of the New York
State supplemental income tax and limitation on itemized deductions may result
in a higher combined Federal, State and local tax rate than indicated in the
table.
PENNSYLVANIA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Taxable Income ($1,000's) Tax-Exempt Estimated Current Return
Single Joint Tax
Return Return Bracket* 5 1/2% 6% 6 1/2% 7% 7 1/2% 8% 8 1/2%
Equivalent Taxable Estimated Current Return
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0 - 22.80 $ 0 - 38.00 17.4% 6.66% 7.26% 7.87% 8.47% 9.08% 9.69% 10.29%
22.80 - 55.10 38.00 - 91.90 30 7.86 8.57 9.29 10.00 10.71 11.43 12.14
55.10 - 115.00 91.90 - 140.00 32.9 8.20 8.94 9.69 10.43 11.18 11.92 12.67
115.00 - 250.00 140.00 - 250.00 37.8 8.84 9.65 10.45 11.25 12.06 12.86 13.67
Over 250.00 Over 250.00 41.3 9.37 10.22 11.07 11.93 12.78 13.63 14.48
</TABLE>
* The table does not reflect the effect of the exemption of the Trust from
local personal property taxes and from the Philadelphia School District
Investment Net Income Tax, accordingly; residents of Pennsylvania subject to
such taxes would need a higher taxable estimated current return than those
shown to equal the tax-exempt estimated current return of the Trust.
A comparison of tax-free and equivalent taxable estimated current returns with
the returns on various taxable investments is one element to consider in
making an investment decision. The Sponsor may from time to time in its
advertising and sales materials compare the then current estimated returns on
the Trusts and returns over specified periods on other similar Van Kampen
Merritt sponsored unit investment trusts with returns on taxable investments
such as corporate or U.S. Government bonds, bank CDs and money market accounts
or money market funds, each of which has investment characteristics that may
differ from those of the Trusts. U.S. Government bonds, for example, are
backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government and bank CDs and
money market accounts are insured by an agency of the federal government.
Money market accounts and money market funds provide stability of principal,
but pay interest at rates that vary with the condition of the short-term debt
market. The investment characteristics of the Trusts are described more fully
elsewhere in this Prospectus.
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS
The tables below set forth the per Unit estimated distributions of interest,
principal and rebates of Purchased Interest to Unitholders. The tables assume
no changes in expenses, no changes in the current interest rates, no
exchanges, redemptions, sales or prepayments of the underlying Securities
prior to maturity or expected retirement date and the receipt of principal
upon maturity or expected retirement date. To the extent the foregoing
assumptions change actual distributions will vary.
California IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Estimated Estimated Purchased Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Interest Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Rebate Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 1994 $ 4.68 $ 4.68
January 1995 - September 2017 5.02 5.02
October 2017 5.02 $ 163.61 $ 1.39 170.02
November 2017 - September 2019 4.16 4.16
October 2019 4.16 114.53 .97 119.66
November 2019 3.56 3.56
December 2019 3.56 32.72 .23 36.51
January 2020 - September 2021 3.42 3.42
October 2021 3.42 163.61 1.30 168.33
November 2021 - June 2023 2.62 2.62
July 2023 2.62 32.72 .24 35.58
August 2023 - August 2024 2.47 2.47
September 2024 2.47 163.62 1.38 167.47
October 2024 - July 2026 1.62 1.62
August 2026 1.62 163.61 1.46 166.69
September 2026 - August 2030 .72 .72
September 2030 .72 163.61 1.27 165.60
</TABLE>
Florida IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Estimated Estimated Purchased Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Interest Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Rebate Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 1994 $ 4.52 $ 4.52
January 1995 - September 2004 4.85 4.85
October 2004 4.85 $ 163.50 $ 1.77 170.12
November 2004 - June 2014 3.98 3.98
July 2014 3.98 143.89 1.49 149.36
August 2014 - May 2016 3.25 3.25
June 2016 3.25 114.45 1.21 118.91
July 2016 - September 2017 2.65 2.65
October 2017 2.65 98.10 1.02 101.77
November 2017 - October 2018 2.15 2.15
November 2018 2.15 81.76 .82 84.73
December 2018 - May 2022 1.75 1.75
June 2022 1.75 163.50 1.64 166.89
July 2022 - December 2023 .95 .95
January 2024 .95 49.05 .44 50.44
February 2024 - September 2024 .74 .74
October 2024 .74 163.51 1.63 165.88
</TABLE>
Minnesota IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Estimated Estimated Purchased Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Interest Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Rebate Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 1994 $ 4.50 $ 4.50
January 1995 - January 2010 4.82 4.82
February 2010 4.82 $ 192.00 $ 1.95 198.77
March 2010 - January 2014 3.86 3.86
February 2014 3.86 64.00 .66 68.52
March 2014 - January 2015 3.54 3.54
February 2015 3.54 392.00 3.85 399.39
March 2015 - May 2019 1.66 1.66
June 2019 1.46 80.00 .74 82.20
July 2019 - November 2019 1.29 1.29
December 2019 1.22 32.00 .28 33.50
January 2020 - May 2024 1.16 1.16
June 2024 1.16 80.00 .82 81.98
July 2024 - June 2025 .76 .76
July 2025 .76 160.00 1.68 162.44
</TABLE>
New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Estimated Estimated Purchased Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Interest Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Rebate Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 1994 $ 3.66 $ 3.66
January 1995 - June 1999 3.92 3.92
July 1999 3.92 $ 200.00 $ 1.33 205.25
August 1999 - February 2000 3.27 3.27
March 2000 3.27 100.00 .75 104.02
April 2000 - July 2000 2.91 2.91
August 2000 2.91 66.66 .46 70.03
September 2000 - October 2000 2.69 2.69
November 2000 2.69 33.34 .31 36.34
December 2000 - January 2001 2.53 2.53
February 2001 2.47 33.33 .25 36.05
March 2001 - September 2001 2.41 2.41
October 2001 2.41 83.33 .64 86.38
November 2001 2.10 2.10
December 2001 2.10 83.34 .67 86.11
January 2002 - July 2002 1.77 1.77
August 2002 1.77 200.00 1.92 203.69
September 2002 - March 2003 .83 .83
April 2003 .83 150.00 1.38 152.21
May 2003 - October 2003 .16 .16
November 2003 .16 50.00 .47 50.63
</TABLE>
New York IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Estimated Estimated Purchased Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Interest Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Rebate Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 1994 $ 4.65 $ 4.65
January 1995 - May 2017 4.99 4.99
June 2017 4.56 $ 161.65 $ 1.62 167.83
July 2017 - June 2020 4.20 4.20
July 2020 4.20 161.66 1.72 167.58
August 2020 - February 2022 3.35 3.35
March 2022 2.95 161.65 1.55 166.15
April 2022 - August 2022 2.60 2.60
September 2022 2.52 32.33 .31 35.16
October 2022 - December 2022 2.44 2.44
January 2023 2.44 32.33 .30 35.07
February 2023 - August 2023 2.30 2.30
September 2023 1.91 145.49 1.50 148.90
October 2023 - June 2024 1.56 1.56
July 2024 1.56 161.66 1.69 164.91
August 2024 - March 2034 .73 .73
April 2034 .73 161.65 1.63 164.01
</TABLE>
Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust
Monthly
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Estimated Estimated Purchased Estimated
Distribution Dates Interest Principal Interest Total
(Each Month) Distribution Distribution Rebate Distribution
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 1994 $ 4.63 $ 4.63
January 1995 - June 2015 4.97 4.97
July 2015 4.89 $ 32.21 $ .30 37.40
August 2015 - May 2019 4.82 4.82
June 2019 4.82 161.08 1.68 167.58
July 2019 - June 2022 4.00 4.00
July 2022 4.00 66.05 .70 70.75
August 2022 3.22 161.08 1.66 165.96
September 2022 - October 2022 2.84 2.84
November 2022 2.84 161.08 1.66 165.58
December 2022 - October 2023 2.03 2.03
November 2023 2.03 80.54 .84 83.41
December 2023 - June 2024 1.61 1.61
July 2024 1.61 161.09 1.71 164.41
August 2024 - August 2029 .78 .78
September 2029 .78 161.08 1.72 163.58
</TABLE>
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representations
not contained in this Prospectus; and any information or representation not
contained herein must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the
Fund, the Sponsor or the Underwriters. This Prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in any state
to any person to whom it is not lawful to make such offer in such state.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Title Page
<S> <C>
INTRODUCTION 2
SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION 3
UNITHOLDER EXPLANATIONS 7
Settlement of Bonds in the Trusts 7
The Fund 7
Objectives and Securities Selection 8
Risk Factors 9
Replacement Bonds 12
Bond Redemptions 13
Distributions 13
Certificates 13
Estimated Current Returns and Estimated Long-Term Returns 14
Interest Earning Schedule 14
Calculation of Estimated Net Annual Interest Income 14
Purchased and Accrued Interest 15
Purchased Interest 15
Accrued Interest 15
Public Offering 15
General 15
Offering Price 17
Market for Units 18
Distributions of Interest and Principal 19
Reinvestment Option 19
Redemption of Units 19
Reports Provided 21
Insurance on the Bonds in the Insured Trusts 21
CALIFORNIA IM-IT TRUST 28
FLORIDA IM-IT TRUST 36
MINNESOTA IM-IT TRUST 42
NEW YORK IM-IT INTERMEDIATE LADDERED
MATURITY TRUST 46
NEW YORK IM-IT TRUST 56
PENNSYLVANIA IM-IT TRUST 66
NOTES TO PORTFOLIOS 73
UNDERWRITING 75
TRUST ADMINISTRATION 78
Fund Administration and Expenses 78
Sponsor 78
Compensation of Sponsor and Evaluator 82
Trustee 82
Trustee's Fee 82
Portfolio Administration 83
Sponsor Purchases of Units 83
Insurance Premiums 84
Miscellaneous Expenses 84
General 84
Amendment or Termination 84
Limitation on Liabilities 85
Unit Distribution 85
Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation 86
OTHER MATTERS 87
Legal Opinions 87
Independent Certified Public Accountants 87
FEDERAL TAX STATUS 87
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS 91
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS 92
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION 93
EQUIVALENT TAXABLE ESTIMATED CURRENT RETURN
TABLES 95
ESTIMATED CASH FLOWS TO UNITHOLDERS 98
</TABLE>
This Prospectus contains information concerning the Fund and the Sponsor, but
does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statements and exhibits relating thereto, which the Fund has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act
of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and to which reference is
hereby made.
(R)denotes a registered trademark of Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
PROSPECTUS
October 27, 1994
Insured Municipals
Income Trust, 168th
Insured Multi-Series
California IM-IT 133
Florida IM-IT 85
Minnesota IM-IT 54
New York IM-IT Intermediate
Laddered Maturity Series 13
New York IM-IT 122
Pennsylvania IM-IT 194
Van Kampen Merritt (R)
Investing with a sense of direction (R)
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Mellon Bank Center
1735 Market Street, Suite 1300
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Please retain this Prospectus for future reference.
Contents of Registration Statement
This Amendment of Registration Statement comprises the following paper
and documents:
The facing sheet
The Cross-Reference sheet
The Prospectus
The signatures
The consents of independent public accountants, ratings
services and legal counsel
The following exhibits:
1.1 Copy of Trust Agreement.
1.5 Copy of Agreement Among Underwriters.
3.1 Opinion and consent of counsel as to legality of securities being
registered.
3.2 Opinion of counsel as to Federal, Florida and Minnesota income tax
status of securities being registered.
3.3 Opinion and consent of counsel as to income tax status of the Fund
under New York law and as to income tax status to New York residents
of Units of the New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity and
New York IM-IT Trusts.
3.4 Opinion and consent of counsel as to income tax status to California
residents of Units of the California IM-IT Trust.
3.5 Opinion and consent of counsel as to income tax status to
Pennsylvania residents of Units of the Pennsylvania IM-IT Trust.
4.1 Consent of Interactive Data Services, Inc.
4.2 Consent of Standard & Poor's Corporation.
4.3 Consent of Grant Thornton.
4.4 Financial Data Schedule
Signatures
The Registrant, Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-
Series hereby identifies Insured Municipals Income Trust, 77th Insured
Multi-Series and Insured Municipals Income Trust and Investors' Quality
Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 189 for purposes of the representations
required by Rule 487 and represents the following: (1) that the
portfolio securities deposited in the series as to the securities of
which this Registration Statement is being filed do not differ materially
in type or quality from those deposited in such previous series; (2)
that, except to the extent necessary to identify the specific portfolio
securities deposited in, and to provide essential financial information
for, the series with respect to the securities of which this Registration
Statement is being filed, this Registration Statement does not contain
disclosures that differ in any material respect from those contained in
the registration statements for such previous series as to which the
effective date was determined by the Commission or the staff; and (3)
that it has complied with Rule 460 under the Securities Act of 1933.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant, Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series
has duly caused this Amendment to the Registration Statement to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City
of Chicago and State of Illinois on the 27th day of October, 1994.
Insured Municipals Income Trust
168th Insured Multi-Series
By Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
By Sandra A. Waterworth
Vice President
(Seal)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed below by the
following persons in the capacities indicated and on October 27, 1994.
Signature Title
John C. Merritt Chairman, Chief Executive )
Officer and Director )
William R. Rybak Senior Vice President and )
Chief Financial Officer )
Ronald A. Nyberg Director )
William R. Molinari Director )
Sandra A. Waterworth )
(Attorney-in-fact*)
*An executed copy of each of the related powers of attorney was
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with
the Registration Statement on Form S-6 of Insured Municipals Income
Trust and Investors' Quality Tax-Exempt Trust, Multi-Series 203
(File No. 33-65744) and the same are hereby incorporated herein by
this reference.
Exhibit 1.1
--
Insured Municipals Income Trust
168th Insured Multi-Series
Trust Agreement
Dated: October 27, 1994
This Trust Agreement between Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as Depositor,
American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt
Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee, sets forth certain provisions in full and incorporates other
provisions by reference to the document entitled "Insured Municipals
Income Trust, Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust, Effective July 29,
1987 for 36th Insured Multi-Series and Subsequent Series" (herein called
the "Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust"), and such provisions as are
set forth in full and such provisions as are incorporated by reference
constitute a single instrument. All references herein to Articles and
Sections are to Articles and Sections of the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust.
Witnesseth That:
In consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements herein
contained, the Depositor and the Trustee agree as follows:
Part I
Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust
Subject to the provisions of Part II hereof, all the provisions
contained in the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust are herein
incorporated by reference in their entirety and shall be deemed to be a
part of this instrument as fully and to the same extent as though said
provisions had been set forth in full in this instrument.
Part II
Special Terms and Conditions of Trust
The following special terms and conditions are hereby agreed to:
(a) The Bonds defined in Section 1.01(4) listed in the
Schedules hereto have been deposited in the Trusts under this Trust
Agreement.
(b) The fractional undivided interest in and ownership of the
various Trusts represented by each Unit thereof is the amount set
forth under "Summary of Essential Financial Information-Fractional
Undivided Interest in the Trust per Unit" in the Prospectus.
(c) The approximate amounts, if any, which the Trustee shall
be required to advance out of its own funds and cause to be paid to
the Depositor pursuant to Section 3.05 shall be the amount per Unit
that the Trustee agreed to reduce its fee or pay Trust expenses set
forth in the footnotes to the "Per Unit Information" for each Trust
in the Prospectus times the number of units in such Trust referred
to in Part II (b) of this Trust Agreement.
(d) The First General Record Date and the amount of the second
distribution of funds from the Interest Account of each Trust shall
be the record date for the Interest Account and the amount set forth
under "Interest Earning Schedule" in the Prospectus.
(e) The First Settlement Date shall be the date set forth
under "Summary of Essential Financial Information - First Settlement
Date" in the Prospectus.
(f) Any monies held to purchase "when-issued" bonds will be
held in noninterest bearing accounts.
(g) The Evaluation Time for purpose of sale, purchase or
redemption of Units shall be 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time.
(h) The face of the form of the Certificates will be
substantially as follows:
No.__________ Certificate of Ownership ___________ Units
--Evidencing--
An Undivided Interest
--In--
This is to certify that _____________ is the owner and registered
holder of this Certificate evidencing the ownership of ___________ units
of fractional undivided interest in the above-named Trust created
pursuant to the Indenture, a copy of which is available at the office of
the Trustee. This Certificate is issued under and is subject to the
terms, provisions and conditions of the Indenture to which the Holder of
this Certificate by virtue of the acceptance hereof assents and is bound,
a summary of which Indenture is contained in the Prospectus relating to
the Trust. This Certificate is transferable and interchangeable by the
registered owner in person or by his duly authorized attorney at the
Trustee's office upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed or
accompanied by a written instrument of transfer and any other documents
that the Trustee may require for transfer, in form satisfactory to the
Trustee and payment of the fees and expenses provided in the Indenture.
Witness the facsimile signature of a duly authorized officer of the
Sponsor and the manual signature of an authorized signatory of the
Trustee.
Dated:
Van Kampen Merritt Inc. The Bank of New York
Depositor Trustee
By _______________________________ By_______________________________
Chairman Authorized Signatory
(i) Section 8.02(d) and (e) of the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust are hereby stricken and replaced by the
following:
(d) distribution to each Certificateholder of such Trust
such holder's pro rata share of the balance of the Interest
Account of such Trust;
(e) distribution to each Certificateholder of such Trust
such holder's pro rata share of the balance of the Principal
Account of such Trust; and
In Witness Whereof, Van Kampen Merritt Inc. has caused this
Trust Agreement to be executed by one of its Vice Presidents or
Assistant Vice Presidents and its corporate seal to be hereto
affixed and attested by its Secretary or one of its Vice Presidents
or Assistant Secretaries, American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a
division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., has caused
this Trust Indenture and Agreement to be executed by its President
or one of its Vice Presidents and its corporate seal to be hereto
affixed and attested to by its Secretary, its Assistant Secretary or
one of its Assistant Vice Presidents and The Bank of New York, has
caused this Trust Agreement to be executed by one of its Vice
Presidents and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed and attested
to by one of its Vice Presidents, Assistant Vice Presidents or
Assistant Treasurers; all as of the day, month and year first above
written.
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
By Sandra A. Waterworth
Vice President
(Seal)
Attest:
By Gina M. Scumaci
Assistant Secretary
American Portfolio Evaluation
Services, a division of Van Kampen
Merritt Investment Advisory Corp.
By Dennis J. McDonnell
President
(Seal)
Attest:
By Scott E. Martin
Secretary
The Bank Of New York
By Jeffrey Bieselin
Vice President
(Seal)
Attest:
By Norbert Loney
Assistant Treasurer
Schedules To Trust Agreement
Securities Initially Deposited
In
Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series
(Note: Incorporated herein and made a part hereof as indicated below are
the corresponding "Portfolios" of each of the Trusts as set forth in
the Prospectus.)
Exhibit 1.5
Dated: June 1, 1992
Master Agreement Among Underwriters
For Unit Investment Trusts Sponsored by
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Gentlemen:
1. The Trust. We understand that you, Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
(the "Sponsor"), are entering into this agreement (the "Agreement") in
counterparts with us and other firms who may be underwriters for issues
of various series of unit investment trusts for which you will act as
Sponsor. This Agreement shall apply to any offering after May 1, 1992 of
units of fractional undivided interest in such various series unit
investment trusts in which we elect to act as an underwriter
(underwriters with respect to each such trust being hereinafter called
"Underwriters") after receipt of a notice from you stating the name and
size of the trust and that our participation as an Underwriter in the
proposed offering shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement.
The issuer of the units of fractional undivided interests in a series of
a unit investment trust offered in any offering of units made pursuant to
this Agreement is hereinafter referred to as the "Trust" and the
reference to "Trust" in this Agreement applies only to such Trust, and
such units of such Trust offered are hereinafter called the "Units".
Each Trust is or will be registered as a "unit investment trust" under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act") by appropriate
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission").
Additionally, each Trust is or will be registered with the Commission
under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") on Form S-6 or its
successor forms, including a proposed form of prospectus (the
"Preliminary Prospectus").
The registration statement as finally amended and revised at the
time it becomes effective is herein referred to as the "Registration
Statement" and the related prospectus is herein referred to as the
"Prospectus", except that if the prospectus filed by the Trust pursuant
to Rule 424(b) under the 1933 Act shall differ from the prospectus on
file at the time the Registration Statement shall become effective, the
term "Prospectus" shall refer to the prospectus filed pursuant to Rule
424(b) from and after the date on which it shall have been filed.
The following provisions of this Agreement shall apply separately to
each individual offering of Units by a Trust.
We understand that as of the date upon which we have agreed to
underwrite Units of the Trust the Commission shall not have issued any
order preventing or restraining the use of any Preliminary Prospectus
and, further, that each Preliminary Prospectus shall conform in all
material respects to the requirements of the 1933 Act and the Rules and
Regulations thereunder and, as of its date, shall not include any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements therein not misleading; and when the Registration
Statement becomes effective, it and the Prospectus, and any amendments or
supplements thereto, will contain all statements that are required to be
stated therein in accordance with the 1933 Act and the Rules and
Regulations thereunder and will in all material respects conform to the
requirements of the 1933 Act and the Rules and Regulations thereunder,
and neither the Registration Statement nor the Prospectus, nor any
amendment or supplement thereto, will contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading;
provided, however, that you make no representation or warranty as to
information contained in or omitted from any Preliminary Prospectus, the
Registration Statement, the Prospectus or any such amendment or
supplement, in reliance upon and in conformity with, written information
furnished to you by or on behalf of any Underwriter specifically for use
in the preparation thereof.
2. Designation and Authority of Representative. You are hereby
authorized to act as our representative (the "Representative") in
connection with all matters to which this Agreement relates and to take
the action provided herein to be taken by you as you may otherwise deem
necessary or advisable. We understand that we have no obligations under
this Agreement with respect to any Trust in which we choose not to
participate as an Underwriter.
You will be under no liability to us for any act or omission except
for obligations expressly assumed by you herein and no obligations on
your part will be implied or inferred herefrom. The rights and
liabilities of the respective parties hereto are several and not joint,
and nothing herein or hereunder will constitute then a partnership,
association or separate entity.
3. Profit or Loss in Acquisition of Securities. It is understood
that the acquisition of securities (the "Securities") for deposit in the
portfolio of the Trust shall be at your cost and risk. We acknowledge
that you will share with us any net deposit profits in the amounts and to
the extent, if any, indicated under "Sponsor and Underwriter
Compensation" in the Prospectus. For the purposes of determining the
number of Units underwritten, we understand that we will be credited for
that number of Units set forth opposite our name in the section entitled
"Underwriting" in the prospectus.
We agree that you shall have no liability (as Representative or
otherwise) with respect to the issue form, validity, legality,
enforceability, value of, or title to the Securities, except for the
exercise of due care in determining the genuineness of such Securities
and the conformance thereof with the descriptions and qualifications
appearing in the Prospectus.
4. Purchase of Units. Promptly after you make a determination to
offer Units of a Trust and you inquire as to whether we desire to
participate in such offering, we will advise you promptly as to the
number of Units which we will purchase or of our decision not to
participate in such offering. Such advice may be written or oral. The
delivery to the Sponsor of a completed Schedule A to this Agreement shall
constitute adequate written advice. Oral advice shall be binding but
shall be promptly confirmed in writing by us by means of telegraph,
telegram or other form of wire or facsimile transmission. Such written
confirmation shall contain the information requested by Schedule A to
this Agreement. You may rely on and we hereby commit on the terms and
conditions of this Agreement to purchase and pay for the number of Units
of the Trust set forth in such advice (the "Unit Commitment"). Our Unit
Commitment may be increased only by mutual agreement between us and you
at any time prior to the date as of which the Trust Agreement for the
Trust is executed (the "Date of Deposit"). We agree that you in your
sole discretion reserve the right to decrease our Unit Commitment at any
time prior to the Date of Deposit and if you so elect to make such a
decrease, you will notify us of such an election by telephone and
promptly confirm the same in writing.
The price to be paid for such Units shall be the Public Offering
Price per Unit (as defined in the Prospectus) as first determined on the
Date of Deposit or such later determination on such Date of Deposit as
you shall advise us, less the sum per Unit indicated under "Sponsor and
Underwriter Compensation" in the Prospectus. Further, each Underwriter
who underwrites that number of Units indicated under "Sponsor and
Underwriter Compensation" in the Prospectus will receive from the Sponsor
that additional compensation indicated under such section of the
Prospectus for each Unit it underwrites, providing the Trust size is in
excess of that number of Units, if any, indicated under such section of
the Prospectus. At the Date of Deposit, we will become the owner of the
Units and be entitled to the benefits (except for interest, if any,
accruing from the Date of Deposit to the First Settlement Date) as well
as the risks inherent therein. We acknowledge that those persons, if
any, named in the Prospectus under "Sponsor and Underwriter Compensation"
are Managing or Co-Managing Underwriters of the Trust, as indicated
therein, and we acknowledge that those persons specifically named therein
will receive as additional compensation those respective per Unit amounts
set forth in such section of the Prospectus.
You are authorized to retain custody of our Units until the
Registration Statement relating thereto has become effective under the
1933 Act and you shall have received payment from us for such Units.
You are authorized to file an amendment to said Registration
Statement describing the Securities and furnishing information based
thereon or relating thereto and any further amendments or supplements to
the Registration Statement or Prospectus which you may deem necessary or
advisable. We will furnish to you upon your request such information as
will be required to insure that the Registration Statement and Prospectus
are current insofar as they relate to us and we thereafter continue to
furnish you with such information as may be necessary to keep current and
correct the information previously supplied.
We understand that the Trust will also take action with respect to
the offering and sale of Units in accordance with the Blue Sky or
securities laws of certain states in which it is proposed that the Units
may be offered and sold.
5. Public Offering. You agree that you will advise us promptly
when the Registration Statement has become effective, and we agree that
when we are advised that the Units are released for public offering, we
will make a public offering thereof by means of the Prospectus under the
1933 Act, as amended, which describes the deposit of Securities and
related information. The Public Offering Price and the terms and
conditions of the public offering shall be as set forth in the Prospectus
and shall rely with respect to the offering price of the Securities upon
the determination of the Evaluator named in the Prospectus. Public
advertisement of the offering, if any, shall be made by you on behalf of
the Underwriters on such date as you shall determine. We agree that
before we use any Trust advertising material which we have created, we
will obtain your prior approval to use such advertising materials.
6. Public Offering Price. We agree that each day while this
Agreement is in effect and the evaluation of the Trust is made by the
Evaluator named in the Prospectus, we will contact you for such
evaluation and of the resultant Public Offering Price for the purpose of
the offering and sale of the respective Units to the public. We agree as
required by Section 22(d) of the 1940 Act to offer and sell our Units at
the current Public Offering Price described in the Prospectus.
7. Permitted Transactions. It is agreed that part or all of the
Units purchased by us may be sold to dealers, or other entities with whom
we can legally grant a concession or agency commission, only at the then
effective Public Offering Price, less the concession described in the
Prospectus.
From time to time prior to the termination of this Agreement, at
your Request, we will advise you of the number of our Units which remain
unsold and, at your request, we agree to deliver to you any of such
unsold Units to be sold for our account to retail accounts or, less the
concession or agency commission then effective, to dealers or others.
If prior to the termination of this Agreement, or such earlier date
as you may determine and advise us thereof in writing, you shall purchase
or contract to purchase any of our Units or any Units issued in exchange
therefor, in the open market or otherwise, or if any such Units shall be
tendered to the Trustee for redemption because not effectively placed for
investment by us, we agree to repurchase such Units at a price equal to
the total cost of such purchase, including accrued interest and
commissions, if any, and transfer taxes on redelivery. Regardless of the
amount paid on the repurchase of any such Units, it is agreed that they
may be resold by us only at the then effective Public Offering Price.
Until the termination of this Agreement, we agree that we will make
no purchase of Units other than (i) purchases provided for in this
Agreement, (ii) purchases approved by you and (iii) purchases as broker
in executing unsolicited orders.
8. Compliance With Commission Order. We hereby agree as follows:
(a) we will refund all sales charges to purchasers of Units from us or
any dealer participating in the distribution of Units who purchased such
Units from us if, within ninety days from the time that the Registration
Statement of the respective Units under the 1933 Act shall have become
effective, (i) the net worth of the trust shall be reduced to less than
20% of the principal amount of Securities originally deposited therein or
(ii) the Trust shall have been terminated; (b) you may instruct the
Trustee on the Date of Deposit that, in the event that redemption by any
Underwriters of Units constituting part of any unsold allotment of Units
shall result in the Trust having a net worth of less than 40% of the
principal amount of Securities originally deposited therein, the Trustee
shall terminate the Trust in the manner provided in the Trust Indenture
and Agreement (as defined in the Prospectus) and distribute the
Securities and other assets of the Trust pursuant to the provisions of
the Trust Indenture and Agreement; and (c) in the event that the Trust
shall have been terminated pursuant to (b) above, we will refund any
sales charges to any purchaser of such Units who purchased from us, or
purchased from a dealer participating in the distribution of such Units
who purchased such Units from us. We authorize you to charge our account
for all refunds of sales charges in respect to our Units.
9. Substitution of Underwriters. We authorize you to arrange for
the substitution hereunder of other persons, who may include you and us,
for all or any part of the commitment of any nondefaulting Underwriter
with the consent of such Underwriter, and of any defaulting Underwriter
without the consent thereof, upon such terms and conditions as you may
deem advisable, provided that the number of Units to be purchased by us
shall not be increased without our consent and that such substitution
shall not in any way affect the liability of any defaulting Underwriter
to the other Underwriters for damages from such default, nor relieve any
other Underwriter of any obligation under this Agreement. The expenses
chargeable to the account of any defaulting Underwriter and not paid for
by it or by a person substituted for such Underwriter and any additional
losses or expenses arising from such default shall be considered to be
expenses under this Agreement and shall be charged against the accounts
of the nondefaulting Underwriters in proportion to their respective
commitments.
10. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate with respect to
each Trust which we have agreed to underwrite 30 days after the date on
which the public offering of the Units of such Trust is made in
accordance with Section 5 hereof unless sooner terminated by you,
provided that you may extend this Agreement for not more than eleven
successive periods of 30 days each upon notice to us and each of the
other Underwriters.
Notwithstanding any settlement on the termination of this Agreement,
we agree to pay our share of any amount payable on account of any claim,
demand or liability which may be asserted against the Underwriters, or
any of them, based on the claim that the Underwriters constitute an
association, unincorporated business or other separate entity and our
share of any expenses incurred by you in defending against any such
claim, demand or liability. We also agree to pay any stamp taxes which
may be assessed and paid after such settlement on account of any Units
received or sold hereunder for our account.
Notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement, no sales of the
Units shall be made by us at any time except in conformity with the
provisions of Section 22(d) of the 1940 Act.
11. Default by Other Underwriters. Default by any one or more of
the other Underwriters in respect of their several obligations under this
Agreement shall neither release you nor us from any of our respective
obligations hereunder.
12. Notices. Notices hereunder shall by deemed to have been duly
given if mailed or telegraphed to us at our address set forth below, in
the case of notices to us, or to you at your address set forth at the
head of this Agreement, in the case of notices to you.
13. Net Capital. You represent that you, and we represent that we,
are in compliance with the capital requirements of Rule 15c-3-1
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, and we may, in accordance with and pursuant to such Rule 15c-3-1,
agree to purchase the amount of Units to be purchased by you and us,
respectively, under the Agreement.
14. Miscellaneous. We confirm that we are a member in good
standing of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
We confirm that we will take reasonable steps to provide the
Preliminary Prospectus or final Prospectus to any person making written
request therefor to us and to make the Preliminary Prospectus or the
final Prospectus available to each person associated with us expected to
solicit customers' orders for the Units prior to the effective
registration date and the final Prospectus if he is expected to offer the
Units after the effective date. We understand that you will supply us
upon our request with sufficient copies of such prospectuses to comply
with the foregoing.
This Agreement is being executed by us and delivered to you in
duplicate. Upon your confirmation hereof and of agreements in identical
form with each of the other Underwriters, this Agreement shall constitute
a valid and binding contract between us.
Very truly yours,
Confirmed as of the date set Indicated below our firm name
forth at the head of this and address exactly as we wish to
Agreement appear in the Prospectus
Van Kampen Merritt, Inc.
By____________________________ ____________________________________
Title__________________________ ____________________________________
____________________________________
Exhibit 3.1
Chapman and Cutler
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
October 27, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
Re:Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series
Gentlemen:
We have served as counsel for Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as Sponsor
and Depositor of Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-
Series (hereinafter referred to as the "Fund"), in connection with the
preparation, execution and delivery of a Trust Agreement dated October
27, 1994 between Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as Depositor, American
Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt
Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee, pursuant to which the Depositor has delivered to and deposited
Bonds listed in the Schedules to the Trust Agreement with the Trustee and
pursuant to which the Trustee has issued to or on the order of the
Depositor a certificate or certificates representing Units of fractional
undivided interest in and ownership of the several Trusts of said Fund
(hereinafter referred to as the "Units") created under said Trust
Agreement.
In connection therewith, we have examined such pertinent records and
documents and matters of law as we have deemed necessary in order to
enable us to express the opinions hereinafter set forth.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:
1. The execution and delivery of the Trust Agreement and the
execution and issuance of certificates evidencing the Units in the
several Trusts of the Fund have been duly authorized; and
2. The certificates evidencing the Units in the several
Trusts of the Fund when duly executed and delivered by the Depositor
and the Trustee in accordance with the aforementioned Trust
Agreement, will constitute valid and binding obligations of such
Trusts and the Depositor in accordance with the terms thereof.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement (File No. 33-55885) relating to the Units referred
to above and to the use of our name and to the reference to our firm in
said Registration Statement and in the related Prospectus.
Respectfully submitted,
Chapman and Cutler
MJK/ch
Exhibit 3.2
Chapman and Cutler
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
October 27, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
New York, New York 10286
Re:Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series
Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel for Van Kampen Merritt Inc., Depositor of
Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series (the "Fund"),
in connection with the issuance of Units of fractional undivided interest
in the several Trusts of said Fund under a Trust Agreement dated October
27, 1994 (the "Indenture") between Van Kampen Merritt Inc., as Depositor,
American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt
Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee. In this connection, we have examined the Registration
Statement, the form of Prospectus proposed to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Indenture and such other
instruments and documents as we have deemed pertinent. Based upon the
foregoing and upon an investigation of such matters of law as we consider
to be applicable, we are of the opinion that, under existing Federal
income tax law:
(i) Each Trust is not an association taxable as a corporation
but will be governed by the provisions of subchapter J (relating to
trusts) of chapter 1, Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code").
(ii) Each Unitholder will be considered as owning a pro rata
share of each asset of the respective Trust in the proportion that
the number of Units of such Trust held by him bears to the total
number of Units outstanding of such Trust. Under subpart E,
subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code, income of each Trust will be
treated as income of each Unitholder of the respective Trust in the
proportion described, and an item of Trust income will have the same
character in the hands of a Unitholder as it would have in the hands
of the Trustee. Accordingly, to the extent that the income of a
Trust consists of interest excludable from gross income under
Section 103 of the
Code, such income will be excludable from Federal gross income of
the Unitholders, except in the case of a Unitholder who is a
substantial user (or a person related to such user) of a facility
financed through issuance of any industrial development bonds or
certain private activity bonds held by the respective Trust. In the
case of such Unitholder (and no other) interest received with
respect to his Units attributable to such industrial development
bonds or such private activity bonds is includable in his gross
income. In the case of certain corporations, interest on the Bonds
is included in computing the alternative minimum tax pursuant to
Section 56(c) of the Code, the environmental tax (the "Superfund
Tax") imposed by Section 59A of the Code, and the branch profits tax
imposed by Section 884 of the Code with respect to U.S. branches of
foreign corporations.
(iii) Gain or loss will be recognized to a Unitholder upon
redemption or sale of his Units. Such gain or loss is measured by
comparing the proceeds of such redemption or sale with the adjusted
basis of the Units represented by his Certificate. Before
adjustment, such basis would normally be cost if the Unitholder had
acquired his Units by purchase, plus his aliquot share of advances
by the Trustee to the Trust to pay interest on Bonds delivered after
the Unitholder's settlement date to the extent that such interest
accrued on the Bonds during the period from the Unitholder's
settlement date to the date such Bonds are delivered to the
respective Trust, but only to the extent that such advances are to
be repaid to the Trustee out of interest received by such Trust with
respect to such Bonds. In addition, such basis will be increased by
the Unitholder's aliquot share of the accrued original issue
discount with respect to each Bond held by the Fund with respect to
which there was an original issue discount at the time the Bond was
issued and reduced by the annual amortization of bond premium, if
any, on Bonds held by the Trust.
(iv) If the Trustee disposes of a Trust asset (whether by sale,
payment on maturity, redemption or otherwise) gain or loss is
recognized to the Unitholder and the amount thereof is measured by
comparing the Unitholder's aliquot share of the total proceeds from
the transaction with his basis for his fractional interest in the
asset disposed of. Such basis is ascertained by apportioning the
tax basis for his Units among each of the Trust assets (as of the
date on which his Units were acquired) ratably according to their
values as of the valuation date nearest the date on which he
purchased such Units. A Unitholder's basis in his Units and of his
fractional interest in each Trust asset must be reduced by the
amount of his aliquot share of interest received by the Trust, if
any, on Bonds delivered after the Unitholder's settlement date to
the extent that such interest accrued on the Bonds during the period
from the Unitholder's settlement date to the date such Bonds are
delivered to the Trust, must be reduced by the annual amortization
of bond premium, if any, on Bonds held by the Trust and must be
increased by the Unitholder's share of the accrued original issue
discount with respect to each Bond which, at the time the Bond was
issued, had original issue discount.
(v) In the case of any Bond held by the Trust where the
"stated redemption price at maturity" exceeds the "issue price",
such excess shall be original issue discount. With respect to each
Unitholder, upon the purchase of his Units subsequent to the
original issuance of Bonds held by the Trust, Section 1272(a)(7) of
the Code provides for a reduction in the accrued "daily portion" of
such original issue discount upon the purchase of a Bond subsequent
to the Bond's original issue, under certain circumstances. In the
case of any Bond held by the Trust the interest on which is
excludable from gross income under Section 103 of the Code, any
original issue discount which accrues with respect thereto will be
treated as interest which is excludable from gross income under
Section 103 of the Code.
(vi) We have examined the Municipal Bond Unit Investment Trust
Insurance Policies, if any, issued to certain of the Trusts on the
Date of Deposit by AMBAC Indemnity Corporation, Financial Guaranty
Insurance Corporation or a combination thereof. Each such policy,
or a combination of such policies, insures all bonds held by the
Trustee for that particular Trust (other than bonds described in
paragraph (vii)) against default in the prompt payment of principal
and interest. In our opinion, any amount paid under each said
policy, or a combination of said policies, which represents maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be
excludable from Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as,
such interest would have been so excludable if paid by the issuer
provided that, at the time such policies are purchased, the amounts
paid for such policies are reasonable, customary and consistent with
the reasonable expectation that the issuer of the bonds, rather than
the insurer, will pay debt service on the bonds. Paragraph (ii) of
this opinion is accordingly applicable to insurance proceeds
representing maturing interest.
(vii) Certain bonds in the portfolios of certain of the Trusts
have been insured by the issuers thereof against default in the
prompt payment of principal and interest. Insurance has been
obtained for such bonds, or, in the case of a commitment, the bonds
will be ultimately insured under the terms of such an insurance
policy, which are designated as issuer insured bonds on the
portfolio pages of the respective Trusts in the Prospectus for the
Fund, by the issuer of such bonds. Insurance obtained by the issuer
is effective so long as such bonds remain outstanding. For each of
these bonds, we have been advised that the aggregate principal
amount of such bonds listed on the portfolio page for the respective
Trust was acquired by the applicable Trust and are part of the
series of such bonds listed on the portfolio page for the respective
Trust in the aggregate principal amount listed on the portfolio page
for the respective Trust. Based upon the assumption that the bonds
acquired by the applicable Trust are part of the series covered by
an insurance policy or, in the case of a commitment, will be
ultimately insured under the terms of such an insurance policy, it
is our opinion that any amounts received by the applicable Trust
representing maturing interest on such bonds will be excludable from
Federal gross income if, and to the same extent as, such interest
would have been so excludable if paid in normal course by the Issuer
provided that, at the time such policies are purchased, the amounts
paid for such policies are reasonable, customary and consistent with
the reasonable expectation that the issuer of the bonds, rather than
the insurer, will pay debt service on the bonds. Paragraph (ii) of
this opinion is accordingly applicable to such payment.
Sections 1288 and 1272 of the Code provide a complex set of rules
governing the accrual of original issue discount. These rules provide
that original issue discount accrues either on the basis of a constant
compound interest rate or ratably over the term of the Bond, depending on
the date the Bond was issued. In addition, special rules apply if the
purchase price of a Bond exceeds the original issue price plus the amount
of original issue discount which accrued to prior owners. The
application of these rules will also vary depending on the value of the
bond on the date a Unitholder acquires his Units, and the price the
Unitholder pays for his Units.
Because the Trusts do not include any "private activity" bonds
within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code issued on or after
August 8, 1986, none of the Trust Fund's interest income shall be treated
as an item of tax preference when computing the alternative minimum tax.
In the case of corporations, for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 1986, the alternative minimum tax and the Superfund Tax
depend upon the corporation's taxable income with certain adjustments.
Pursuant to Section 56(c) of the Code, one of the adjustment items
used in computing AMTI and the Superfund Tax of a corporation (other than
an S Corporation, Regulated Investment Company, Real Estate Investment
Trust or REMIC) for taxable years beginning after 1989, is an amount
equal to 75% of the excess of such corporation's "adjusted current
earnings" over an amount equal to its AMTI (before such adjustment item
and the alternative tax net operating loss deduction). "Adjusted current
earnings" includes all tax-exempt interest, including interest on all
Bonds in the Trust, and tax-exempt original issue discount.
Effective for tax returns filed after December 31, 1987, all
taxpayers are required to disclose to the Internal Revenue Service the
amount of tax-exempt interest earned during the year.
Section 265 of the Code provides for a reduction in each taxable
year of 100 percent of the otherwise deductible interest on indebtedness
incurred or continued by financial institutions, to which either
Section 585 or Section 593 of the Code applies, to purchase or carry
obligations acquired after August 7, 1986, the interest on which is
exempt from Federal income taxes for such taxable year. Under rules
prescribed by Section 265, the amount of interest otherwise deductible by
such financial institutions in any taxable year which is deemed to be
attributable to tax-exempt obligations acquired after August 7, 1986,
will be the amount that bears the same ratio to the interest deduction
otherwise allowable (determined without regard to Section 265) to the
taxpayer for the taxable year as the taxpayer's average adjusted basis
(within the meaning of Section 1016) of tax-exempt obligations acquired
after August 7, 1986, bears to such average adjusted basis for all assets
of the taxpayer, unless such financial institution can otherwise
establish, under regulations, to be prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury, the amount of interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to
purchase or carry such obligations.
We also call attention to the fact that, under Section 265 of the
Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry
Units is not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. Under rules
used by the Internal Revenue Service for determining when borrowed funds
are considered used for the purpose of purchasing or carrying particular
assets, the purchase of Units may be considered to have been made with
borrowed funds even though the borrowed funds are not directly traceable
to the purchase of Units. However, these rules generally do not apply to
interest paid on indebtedness incurred for expenditures of a personal
nature such as a mortgage incurred to purchase or improve a personal
residence.
"The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993" (the "Tax Act") subjects
tax-exempt bonds to the market discount rules of the code effective for
bonds purchased after April 30, 1993. In general, market discount is the
amount (if any) by which the stated redemption price at maturity exceeds
an investor's purchase price (except to the extent that such difference,
if any, is attributable to original issue discount not yet accrued).
Market discount can arise based on the price a Trust pays for Bonds or
the price a Unitholder pays for his or her Units. Under the Tax Act,
accretion of market discount is taxable as ordinary income; under prior
law, the accretion had been treated as capital gain. Market discount
that accretes while a Trust holds a Bond would be recognized as ordinary
income by the Unitholders when principal payments are received on the
Bond, upon sale or at redemption (including early redemption), or upon
the sale of redemption of his or her Units, unless a Unitholder elects to
include market discount in taxable income as it accrues.
We have also examined certain laws of the State of Florida, to
determine their applicability to the Florida IM-IT 82 and Florida IM-IT
Intermediate Laddered Maturity 9 Trust (the "Florida Trust") being
created as part of the Fund and to the holders of Units in the Florida
Trust who are residents of the State of Florida. "Non-Corporate
Unitholder" means a Unitholder of the Florida Trust who is an individual
not subject to the Florida state income tax on corporations under
Chapter 220, Florida Statutes and "Corporate Unitholder" means a
Unitholder of the Florida Trusts that is a corporation, bank or savings
association subject to the Florida state income tax on corporations or
franchise tax imposed on banks or savings associations under Chapter 220,
Florida Statutes.
Although we express no opinion with respect thereto, in rendering
the opinion expressed herein, we have assumed that the Bonds were validly
issued by the State of Florida or its instrumentalities or
municipalities. Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that:
(a) Neither the Florida Trust nor Non-Corporate Unitholders
will be subject to the Florida income tax imposed by Chapter 220,
Florida Statutes. Therefore, any amounts paid to the Florida Trusts
or Non-Corporate Unitholders under an insurance policy issued to the
Florida Trusts, the Issuers, the Underwriters, or the Sponsors
thereof, or others, which represent maturing interest on defaulted
obligations held by the Trustee will not be subject to the Florida
income tax imposed by Chapter 220, Florida Statutes.
(b) Corporate Unitholders will be subject to Florida income or
franchise taxation under Chapter 220, Florida Statutes (1) on
interest received by the Trust, (2) on payments of interest pursuant
to any insurance policy, (3) on gain realized when Bonds are sold,
redeemed or paid at maturity or when insurance payments with respect
to principal are received by the Trust and (4) on gain on the sale
or redemption of Units, to the extent allocable to Florida as
"adjusted federal income." Corporate Unitholders that have a
commercial domicile in Florida will also be subject to Florida
income or franchise taxation on 100 percent of the items of income
described in clauses (1) through (4) of the immediately preceding
sentence to the extent that such income constitutes "nonbusiness
income."
(c) Even if interest on indebtedness incurred or continued by
a Unitholder to purchase Units in the Trust is not deductible for
Federal income tax purposes, it will reduce interest income on the
Bonds which is reportable by Corporate Unitholders for Florida
income tax purposes.
(d) Trust Units held by a Florida resident will be includible
in the resident's estate for Florida estate tax purposes, but if
such estate is not subject to the Federal estate tax, the estate
will not be subject to the Florida estate tax. The Florida estate
tax is limited to the amount of the credit for state death taxes
provided for in section 2011 of the Code, less estate taxes paid to
states other than Florida.
(e) Neither the Bonds nor the Units will be subject to the
Florida ad valorem tax, the Florida intangible personal property tax
or Florida sales or use tax.
We understand that the Minnesota Trust will only have income
consisting of (i) interest from bonds issued by the State of Minnesota
and its political and governmental subdivisions, municipalities and
governmental agencies and instrumentalities and bonds issued by
possessions of the United States which would be exempt from federal and
Minnesota income taxation when paid directly to an individual, trust or
estate (the "Bonds"), (ii) gain on the disposition of such Bonds, and
(iii) proceeds paid under certain insurance policies issued to the
Trustee or to the issuers of the Bonds which represent maturing interest
or principal payments on defaulted Bonds held by the Trustee.
Neither the Sponsor nor its counsel have independently examined the
Bonds to be deposited in and held in the Trust. However, although no
opinion is expressed herein regarding such matters, it is assumed that:
(i) the Bonds were validly issued, (ii) the interest thereon is
excludible from gross income for federal income tax purposes and (iii)
the interest thereon is exempt from income tax imposed by Minnesota that
is applicable to individuals, trusts and estates (the "Minnesota Income
Tax"). It should be noted that interest on the Bonds is subject to tax
in the case of corporations subject to the Minnesota Corporate Franchise
Tax or the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax and is a factor in the
computation of the Minimum Fee applicable to financial institutions. The
opinion set forth below does not address the taxation of persons other
than full time residents of Minnesota.
In the opinion of Chapman and Cutler, Counsel to the Sponsor, under
existing Minnesota income tax law as of the date of this prospectus and
based upon the assumptions above:
(1) The Minnesota Trust is not an association taxable as a
corporation and each Unitholder of the Minnesota Trust will be
treated as the owner of a pro rata portion of the Minnesota Trust,
and the income of such portion of the Minnesota Trust will therefore
be treated as the income of the Unitholder for Minnesota Income Tax
purposes;
(2) Income on the Bonds which is exempt from the Minnesota
Income Tax when received by a Unitholder of the Minnesota Trust and
which would be exempt from the Minnesota Income Tax if received
directly by a Unitholder, will retain its status as exempt from such
tax when received by the Minnesota Trust and distributed to such
Unitholder;
(3) To the extent that interest on the Bonds, if any, which is
includible in the computation of "alternative minimum taxable
income" for federal income tax purposes, such interest will also be
includible in the computation of "alternative minimum taxable
income" for purposes of the Minnesota Alternative Minimum Tax
imposed on individuals, estates and trusts and on corporations;
(4) Each Unitholder of the Minnesota Trust will recognize gain
or loss for Minnesota Income Tax purposes if the Trustee disposes of
a Bond (whether by redemption, sale or otherwise) or if the
Unitholder redeems or sells Units of the Minnesota Trust to the
extent that such a transaction results in a recognized gain or loss
to such Unitholder for federal income tax purposes;
(5) Tax cost reduction requirements relating to amortization
of bond premium may, under some circumstances, result in Unitholders
realizing taxable gain for Minnesota Income Tax purposes when their
Units are sold or redeemed for an amount equal to or less than their
original cost;
(6) Proceeds, if any, paid under individual insurance policies
obtained by issuers of Bonds or the Trusteewhich represent maturing
interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will be
excludible from Minnesota net income if, and to the same extent as,
such interest would have been so excludible if paid in the normal
course by the issuer of the defaulted obligation provided that, at
the time such policies are purchased, the amounts paid for such
policies are reasonable, customary and consistent with the
reasonable expectation that the issuer of the bonds, rather than the
insurer, will pay debt service on the bonds; and
(7) To the extent that interest derived from the Minnesota
Trust by a Unitholder with respect to any Possession Bonds is
excludible from gross income for federal income tax purposes
pursuant to 48 U.S.C. Section 745, 48 U.S.C. Section 1423a and 48
U.S.C. Section 1403, such interest will not be subject to either the
Minnesota Income Tax or the Minnesota alternative minimum tax
imposed on individuals, estates and trusts. It should be noted that
interest relating to Possession Bonds is subject to tax in the case
of corporations subject to the Minnesota Corporate Franchise Tax or
the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax.
We have not examined any of the Bonds to be deposited and held in
the Minnesota Trust or the proceedings for the issuance thereof or the
opinions of bond counsel with respect thereto, and therefore express no
opinions to the exemption from State income taxes of interest on the
Bonds if received directly by a Unitholder.
Very truly yours,
Chapman and Cutler
MJK/ch
Exhibit 3.3
Tanner Propp & Farber
99 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016
October 27, 1994
Insured Municipals Income Trust
168th Insured Multi-Series
The Bank of New York,
As Trustee
101 Barclay Street, 17 West
New York, New York 10286
Dear Sirs:
We have acted as special counsel for the Insured Municipals Income Trust,
168th Insured Multi-Series (the "Fund") consisting of California Insured
Municipals Income Trust, Series 133, Florida Insured Municipals Income Trust,
Series 85, Minnesota Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 54, New York
Insured Municipals Income Trust, Intermediate Laddered Maturity Series 13, New
York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 122 and Pennsylvania Insured
Municipals Income Trust, Series 194, (individually the "Trust" and in the
aggregate the "Trusts") for the purposes of determining the applicability of
certain New York taxes under the circumstances hereinafter described.
The Fund is created pursuant to a Trust Agreement (the "Indenture"),
dated as of today (the "Date of Deposit") among Van Kampen Merritt Inc. (the
"Depositor"), American Portfolio Evaluation Services, a division of Van Kampen
Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., as Evaluator, and The Bank of New York as
Trustee (the "Trustee"). As described in the prospectus relating to the Fund
dated today to be filed as an amendment to a registration statement previously
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (file number 33-55885) under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Prospectus" and the "Registration
Statement"), the objectives of the Fund are the generation of income exempt
from Federal taxation and as regards each of the "State" Trusts exempt from
income tax and personal property tax of the State denominated in the name of
that "State" Trust, if any, to the extent indicated in the Prospectus. No
opinion is expressed herein with regard to the Federal or State tax aspects of
the bonds, the Fund, Trusts (other than New York),
units of the Trusts (the "Units") other than New York, or any interest, gains
or losses in respect thereof.
As more fully set forth in the Indenture and in the Prospectus, the
activities of the Trustee will include the following:
On the Date of Deposit, the Depositor will deposit with the Trustee with
respect to each of the Trusts, the total principal amount of interest bearing
obligations and/or contracts for the purchase thereof together with an
irrevocable letter of credit in the amount required for the purchase price and
accrued interest, if any, and an insurance policy purchased by the Depositor
evidencing the insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and
interest of tile obligations comprising the corpus of such trusts oilier than
those obligations the timely payment of principal and interest of which are
guaranteed by an insurance policy purchased by the issuer thereof or a prior
owner, which may be the Depositor prior to the Date of Deposit, as more fully
set forth in the Prospectus with respect to each Trust.
We understand with respect to the obligations described in the preceding
paragraph that all insurance, whether purchased by the Depositor, a prior
owner or the issuer, provides, or will provide, that the amount paid by the
insurer in respect of any bond may not exceed the amount of principal and
interest due on the bond and such payment will in no event relieve the issuer
from its continuing obligation to pay such defaulted principal and interest in
accordance with the terms of the obligation.
The Trustee will not participate in the selection of the obligations to
be deposited in the Fund, and, upon the receipt thereof, will deliver to the
Depositor a registered certificate for the number of Units representing the
entire capital of each of the Trusts as more fully set forth in the Prospectus
and the Registration Statement. The Units, which are represented by
certificates ("Certificates"), will be offered to the public by the Prospectus
upon the effectiveness of the Registration Statement.
The duties of the Trustee, which are ministerial in nature, will consist
primarily of crediting the appropriate accounts with interest received by each
of the Trusts and with the proceeds from the disposition of obligations held
in the Trusts and the distribution of such interest and proceeds to the Unit
holders of that Trust. The Trustee will also maintain records of the
registered holders of Certificates representing an interest in each Trust and
administer the redemption of Units by such Certificate holders and may perform
certain administrative functions with respect to an automatic investment
option.
Generally, obligations held in the Fund may be removed therefrom by the
Trustee only upon redemption prior to their stated maturity, at the direction
of the Depositor in the event of an advance refunding or upon the occurrence
of certain other specified events which adversely affect the sound investment
character of the Fund, such as default by the issuer in payment of interest or
principal on the obligation and no provision for payment is made therefor
either pursuant to insurance or otherwise and the Depositor fails to instruct
the Trustee, within thirty (30) days after notification, to hold such
obligation.
Prior to the termination of the Fund, the Trustee is empowered to sell
Bonds, from a list furnished by the Evaluator, only for the purpose of
redeeming Units tendered to it and of paying expenses for which funds are not
available. The Trustee does not have the power to vary the investment of any
Unit holder in the Fund, and under no circumstances may the proceeds of sale
of any obligations held by the Fund be used to purchase new obligations to be
held therein.
Article 9-A of the New York Tax Law imposes a franchise tax on business
corporations, and, for purposes of that Article, Section 208(l) defines the
term "corporation" to include, among other things, "any business conducted by
a trustee or trustees wherein interest or ownership is evidenced by
certificate or other written instrument."
The Regulations promulgated under Section 208 provide as follows:
A business conducted by a trustee or trustees in which
interest or ownership is evidenced by certificate or other
written instrument includes, but is not limited to, an
association commonly referred to as a "business trust" or
"Massachusetts trust". In determining whether a trustee
or trustees are conducting a business, the form of the
agreement is of significance but is not controlling. The
actual activities of the trustee or trustees, not their
purposes and powers, will be regarded as decisive factors
in determining whether a trust is subject to tax under
Article 9-A. The mere investment of funds and the
collection of income therefrom, with incidental
replacement of securities and reinvestment of funds, does
not constitute the conduct of a business in the case of a
business conducted by a trustee or trustees. 20 NYCRR 1-
2.3(b)(2) (July 11, 1990).
New York cases dealing with the question of whether a trust will be
subject to the franchise tax have also delineated the general rule that where
a trustee merely invests funds and collects and distributes the income
therefrom, the trust is not engaged in business and is not subject to the
franchise tax. Burrell v. Lynch, 274 A.D. 347, 84 N.Y.S.2d 171 (3rd Dept.
1948), order resettled, 274 A.D. 1083, 85 N.Y.S.2d 705 (3rd Dept. 1949).
In an opinion of the Attorney General of the State of New York, 47 N.Y.
Atty. Gen. Rep. 213 (Nov. 24, 1942), it was held that where the trustee of an
unincorporated investment trust was without authority to reinvest amounts
received upon the sales of securities and could dispose of securities making
up the trust only upon the happening of certain specified events or the
existence of certain specified conditions, the trust was not subject to the
franchise tax.
In the instant situation, the Trustee is not empowered to sell
obligations contained in the corpus of the Fund and reinvest the proceeds
therefrom. Further, the power to sell such obligations is limited to
circumstances in which the creditworthiness or soundness of the obligation is
in question or in which cash is needed to pay redeeming Unit holders or to pay
expenses, or where the Fund is liquidated pursuant to the termination of the
Indenture. Only in circumstances in which the issuer of an obligation
attempts to refinance it can the Trustee exchange an obligation for a new
security. In substance, the Trustee will merely collect and distribute income
and will not reinvest any income or proceeds, and the Trustee has no power to
vary the investment of any Unit holder in the Fund.
Under Subpart E of Part 1, Subchapter J of Chapter I of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the grantor of a trust will be
deemed to be the owner of the trust under certain circumstances and therefore
taxable on his proportionate interest in the income thereof. Where this
Federal tax rule applies, the income attributed to the grantor will also be
income to him for New York income tax purposes. See TSB-M78(9)(c), New York
Department of Taxation and Finance, June 23, 1978.
Article 22 (Personal Income Tax) of the New York Tax Law imposes a tax on
a New York State resident individual's State adjusted gross income. Such
amount is defined by Section 612 as his Federal adjusted gross income, with an
addition for interest income on the obligations of a State or political
subdivision of a state other than New York, if excluded from his federal
adjusted gross income. Such amount is defined by Section T46112 of the
Administrative Code of the City of New York as Ins Federal adjusted gross
income, with an addition for interest income on the obligations of a state or
political subdivision of a state other than New York, if excluded from his
federal adjusted gross income. 48 U.S.C. Section 745 exempts interest on a
bond issued by the Government of Puerto Rico or a political subdivision
thereof from tax of the United States, of any State, and of any state's
county, municipality, or municipal subdivision thereof. 48 U.S.C. Section
1423a exempts interest on a bond issued by the Government of Guam or by its
authority from taxation by the United States, any state or political
subdivision. The New York Trust holds only obligations issued by New York
State or a political subdivision thereof or by the Government of Puerto Rico
or a political subdivision thereof, or by the Government of Guam or by its
authority.
By letter, dated today, Messrs. Chapman and Cutler, counsel for the
Depositor, rendered their opinion that each Unit holder of a Trust will be
considered as owning a share of each asset of that Trust in the proportion
that the number of Units held by such holder bears to the total number of
Units outstanding and the income of a Trust will be treated as the income of
each Unit holder of that Trust in said proportion pursuant to Subpart E of
Part 1, Subchapter J of Chapter I of the Code.
Based on the foregoing and of the opinion of Messrs. Chapman and Cutler,
co-counsel for the Depositor, dated today, upon which we specifically rely, we
are of the opinion that under existing laws, rulings, and court decisions
interpreting the laws of the State and City of New York:
1. Each of the Trusts will not constitute an association taxable as a
corporation under New York law, and, accordingly, will not be subject to tax
on its income under the New York State franchise tax or the New York City
general corporation tax.
2. The income of each of the Trusts will be treated as the income of
the Unit holders under the income tax laws of the State and City of New York.
3. Resident individuals of New York State and City will not be subject
to the State or City personal income taxes on interest income on their
proportionate shares of interest income earned by a Trust on any obligation of
New York State or a political subdivision thereof or of the Government of
Puerto Rico or a political subdivision thereof or of the Government of Guam or
by its authority, to the extent such income is excludable from Federal gross
income under Code Section 103.
4. Any amounts paid under the insurance policies purchased by the
Depositor and deposited with the Trustee, as more fully described above,
representing maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee
will not be subject to New York State or City income taxes if, and to the same
extent as, such amounts would have been excludable from New York State or City
income taxes if paid by the issuer. Paragraph 3 of this opinion is
accordingly applicable to such policy proceeds representing maturing interest.
5. Any amounts paid under an insurance policy purchased by the issuer
of an obligation or a prior owner, as more fully described above, representing
maturing interest on such defaulting obligation held by the Trustee will not
be subject to New York State or City income taxes if, and to the same extent
as, such amounts would have been excludable from New York State or City income
taxes if paid by the issuer. Paragraph 3 of this opinion is accordingly
applicable to such policy proceeds representing maturing interest.
6. Resident individuals of New York State and City who hold Units will
recognize gain or loss, if any, under the State or City personal income tax
law if the Trustee disposes of a Fund asset. The amount of such gain or loss
is measured by comparing the Unit holder's aliquot share of the total proceeds
from the transaction with his basis for his fractional interest in the asset
disposed of. Such basis is ascertained by apportioning the tax basis for his
Units among each of the Trust's assets (as of the date on which is Units were
acquired) ratably according to their values as of the valuation date nearest
the date on which he purchased such Units. A Unit holder's basis in his Units
and of his fractional interest in the Trust's assets must be reduced by the
amount of his aliquot share of interest received by the Trust, if any, on
bonds delivered after the settlement date to the extent that such interest
accrued on the Bonds during the period from the Unit holder's settlement date
to the date such Bonds are delivered to that Trust and must be adjusted for
amortization of bond premium or accretion of original issue discount, if any,
on tax-exempt obligations held by the Trust.
7. Resident individuals of New York State and City who hold Units will
recognize gain or loss, if any, under the State or City personal income tax
law if the Unit holder sells or redeems any Units. Such gain or loss is
increased by comparing the proceeds of such redemption or sale with the
adjusted basis of the Units redeemed or sold. Before adjustment, such basis
would normally be cost if the Unit holder had acquired his Units by purchase,
plus his aliquot share of advances by the Trustee to the Fund to pay interest
on Bonds delivered after the Unit holder's settlement date to the extent that
such interest accrued on the Bonds during the period from the settlement date
to the date such Bonds are delivered to the Fund, but only to the extent that
such advances are to be repaid to the Trustee out of interest received by the
Fund with respect to such Bonds.
8. Unit holders who are not residents of New York State are not subject
to the personal income tax law thereof with respect to any interest or gain
derived from a Trust or any gain from the sale or other disposition of the
Units, except to the extent that such interest or gain is from property
employed in a business, trade, profession or occupation carried on in New York
state.
In addition, we are of the opinion that no New York State stock transfer
tax will be payable in respect of any transfer of the Certificates by reason
of the exemption contained in paragraph (a) of Subdivision 8 of Section 270 of
the New York Tax Law.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement relating to the Units and to the use of our name and
the reference to our firm in the Registration Statement and in the Prospectus.
Very truly yours,
Tanner Propp & Farber
MNS:ac
Exhibit 3.4
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Old Federal Reserve Bank Building
400 Sansome Street
San Francisco, California 94111
October 27, 1994
The Bank of New York
through its Wall Street Trust Division
101 Barclay Street
New York, New York 10286
Re: California Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 133
Dear Sirs:
We have acted as special California counsel for Van Kampen Merritt
Inc., as Sponsor and Depositor of California Insured Municipals Income
Trust, Series 133 (the "Fund"), in connection with the issuance under the
Trust Indenture and Agreement dated October 27, 1994, among Van Kampen
Merritt Inc., as Sponsor and Depositor, American Portfolio Evaluation
Services, a division of Van Kampen Merritt Investment Advisory Corp., as
Evaluator, and The Bank of New York through its Wall Street Trust
division, as Trustee, of 3,056 Units of fractional undivided interest
in the Fund (the "Units") in exchange for certain bonds, as well as
"regular-way" and "when-issued" contracts for the purchase of bonds (such
bonds and contracts are hereinafter referred to collectively as the
"Securities").
In connection therewith, we have examined such corporate records,
certificates and other documents and such questions of law as we have
deemed necessary or appropriate for the purpose of this opinion, and, on
the basis of such examination, and upon existing provisions of the
Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, we are of the
opinion that:
1. The Fund is not an association taxable as a corporation
and the income of the Fund will be treated as the income of the
certificateholders under the income tax laws of California.
2. Amounts treated as interest on the underlying securities
which are exempt from tax under California personal income tax and
property tax laws when received by the Fund will, under such laws,
retain their status as tax-exempt interest when distributed to
certificateholders. However, interest on the underlying securities
attributed to a certificateholder which is a corporation subject to
the California franchise tax laws may be includable in its gross
income for purposes of determining its California franchise tax.
3. Under California income tax law, each certificateholder in
the Fund will have a taxable event when the Fund disposes of a
security (whether by sale, exchange, redemption, or payment at
maturity) or when the certificateholder redeems or sells Units.
Because of the requirement that tax cost basis be reduced to reflect
amortization of bond premium, under some circumstances a
certificateholder may realize taxable gain when Units are sold or
redeemed for an amount equal to, or less than, their original cost.
The total tax cost of each Unit to a certificateholder is allocated
among each of the bond issues held in the Fund (in accordance with
the proportion of the Fund comprised by each bond issue) in order to
determine his per unit tax cost for each bond issue; and the tax
cost reduction requirements relating to amortization of bond premium
will apply separately to the per unit cost of each bond issue.
Certificateholders' bases in their Units, and the bases for their
fractional interest in each Fund asset, may have to be adjusted for
their pro rata share of accrued interest received, if any, on
securities delivered after the certificateholders' respective
settlement dates.
4. Under the California personal property tax laws, bonds
(including the Securities) or any interest therein is exempt from
such tax.
5. Any proceeds paid under the insurance policy issued to the
Trustee of the fund with respect to the Securities which represent
maturing interest on defaulted obligations held by the Trustee will
be exempt from California personal income tax if, and to the same
extent as, such interest would have been so exempt if paid by the
issuer of the defaulted obligations.
6. Under Section 17280(b)(2) of the California Revenue and
Taxation Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to
purchase or carry Units of the Trust is not deductible for the
purposes of the California personal income tax. While there
presently is no California authority interpreting this provision,
Section 17280(b)(2) directs the California Franchise Tax Board to
prescribe regulations determining the proper allocation and
apportionment of interest costs for this purpose. The Franchise Tax
Board has not yet proposed or prescribed such regulations. In
interpreting the generally similar Federal provision, the Internal
Revenue Service has taken the position that such indebtedness need
not be directly traceable to the purchase or carrying of Units
(although the Service has not contended that a deduction for
interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase or improve a personal
residence or to purchase goods or services for personal consumption
will be disallowed). In the absence of conflicting regulations or
other California authority, the California Franchise Tax Board
generally has interpreted California statutory tax provisions in
accord with Internal Revenue Service interpretations of similar
Federal provisions.
Opinions relating to the validity of securities and the exemption of
interest thereon from State of California income tax are rendered by bond
counsel to the issuing authority at the time securities are issued and we
have relied solely upon such opinions, or, as to securities not yet
delivered, forms of such opinions contained in official statements
relating to such securities. Except in certain instances in which we
acted as bond counsel to issuers of securities, and as such made a review
of proceedings relating to the issuance of certain securities at the time
of their issuance, we have not made any review of proceedings relating to
the issuance of securities or the bases of bond counsels' opinions.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement (SEC No. 33-55885) relating to the Units referred
to above and to the use of our name and to the reference to our firm in
said Registration Statement and in the related Prospectus.
Very truly yours,
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Exhibit 3.5
Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul
3800 Centre Square West
Philadelpia, PA 19102
October 27, 1994
Insured Municipals Income Trust
168th Insured Multi-Series
Pennsylvania Insured Municipals
Income Trust, Series 194
c/o Chapman & Cutler
111 W. Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Attention: Mark J. Kneedy, Esquire
Re: Insured Municipals Income Trust
168th Insured Multi-Series
Pennsylvania Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 194
Gentlemen:
We are acting as special counsel with respect to Pennsylvania tax
matters for the Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-
Series, Pennsylvania Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 194 (the
"Fund") in connection with the issuance of Units of fractional undivided
interests in the Fund, under a Trust Indenture and Agreement dated
October 27, 1994 between Van Kampen Merritt, Inc. ("Van Kampen") as
Depositor, American Portfolio Advisory Service, Inc., as Evaluator, and
The Bank of New York through its Wall Street Trust division, as Trustee.
It is our understanding that the Fund consists of a portfolio composed of
interest-bearing obligations issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
or by municipalities and other governmental authorities within the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the "Bonds").
We have not examined any preliminary or final official statements of
issuers of the Bonds, nor have we examined any legal opinions, or
summaries of such opinions, relating to the validity of the Bonds in the
Fund, the exemption of interest thereon from federal income tax, the
exemption of the Bonds from personal property taxes in Pennsylvania, or
the exemption of the interest on and any gain from the sale of the Bonds
from the Pennsylvania personal income tax, given or to be given by bond
counsel to the issuer at the time such Bonds are issued. Further, we
have made no review of the proceedings relating to the issuance of the
Bonds or of the basis for such opinions. Our opinion expressed below is
based in part on the assurance of Van Kampen that the Bonds being
deposited in the Fund have been issued only by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania or by or on behalf of municipalities or other governmental
agencies within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
We have examined certified copies, or copies otherwise identified to
our satisfaction, of such other documents as we have deemed necessary or
appropriate for the purpose of rendering this opinion, including those
related to previous transactions in which Van Kampen was the Depositor
which we have been assured by Van Kampen are substantially the same as
those relating to the Fund.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:
(1) Units evidencing fractional undivided interests in the
Fund, to the extent represented by obligations issued by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, any public authority, commission,
board or other agency created by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
any political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or any
public authority created by any such political subdivision, are not
taxable under any of the personal property taxes presently in effect
in Pennsylvania;
(2) Distributions of interest income to Unitholders that would
not be taxable if received directly by a Pennsylvania resident are
not subject to personal income tax under the Pennsylvania Tax Reform
Code of 1971; nor will such interest be taxable under Philadelphia
School District Investment Income Tax imposed on Philadelphia
resident individuals;
(3) A Unitholder may have a taxable event under the
Pennsylvania state and local income tax referred to in the preceding
paragraph upon the redemption or sale of his Units but not upon the
disposition of any of the Bonds in the Fund to which the holder's
Units relate;
(4) Units are subject to Pennsylvania inheritance and estate
taxes;
(5) A Unitholder which is a corporation may have a taxable
event under the Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax upon the
redemption or sale of its Units. Interest income distributed to
Unitholders which are corporations is not subject to Pennsylvania
Corporate Net Income Tax or Mutual Thrift Institutions Tax.
However, banks, title insurance companies and trust companies may be
required to take the value of Units into account in determining the
taxable value of their shares subject to Shares Tax;
(6) Under Act No. 68 of December 3, 1993, gains derived by the
Fund from the sale, exchange or other disposition of bonds may be
subject to Pennsylvania personal or corporate income taxes. Those
gains which are distributed by the Fund to the Unitholders who are
individuals may be subject to Pennsylvania Personal Income Tax. For
Unitholders which are corporations, the distributed gains may be
subject to Corporate Net Income Tax or Mutual Thrift Institutions
Tax. Gains which are not distributed by the Fund may nevertheless
be taxable to Unitholders if derived by the Fund from the sale,
exchange or other disposition of Bonds issued on or after February
1, 1994. Gains which are not distributed by the Fund will remain
nontaxable to Unitholders if derived by the Fund from the sale,
exchange or other disposition of Bonds issued prior to February 1,
1994;
(7) Any proceeds paid under insurance policies issued to the
Trustee or obtained by issuers or the underwriters of the bonds, the
Sponsor or others which represent interest on defaulted obligations
held by the Trustee will be excludable from Pennsylvania gross
income if, and to the same extent as, such interest would have been
so excludable if paid in the normal course by the issuer of the
defaulted obligations; and
(8) The Fund is not taxable as a corporation under
Pennsylvania tax laws applicable to corporations.
On December 3, 1993, changes to Pennsylvania law affecting taxation
of income and gains from the sale of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
local obligations were enacted. Among these changes was the repeal of
the exemption from tax of gains realized upon the sale or other
disposition of such obligations. The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue
has issued proposed regulations concerning these changes. The opinions
expressed above are based on our analysis of the law and proposed
regulations but are subject to modification upon review of final
regulations or other guidance that may be issued by the Department of
Revenue or future court decisions.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement (SEC No. 33-55885) relating to the Units referred
to above and to the use of our name and to the reference to our firm in
the said Registration Statement and in the related Prospectus.
Very truly yours,
Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul
SERS:RTF/jsr
Exhibit 4.1
Interactive Data
14 West Street
New York, NY 10005
October 25, 1994
Van Kampen Merritt, Inc.
One Parkview Plaza
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
Re: Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series
(A Unit Investment Trust) Registered Under the Securities Act of
1933 File No. 33-55885
Gentlemen:
We have examined the Registration Statement for the above captioned
Fund, copy of which is attached hereto.
We hereby consent to the reference in the Prospectus and Registration
Statement for the above captioned Fund to Interactive Data Services, Inc.,
as the Evaluator, and to the use of the Obligations prepared by us which
are referred to in such Prospectus and Statement.
You are authorized to file copies of this letter with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Very truly yours,
James Perry
Vice President
Exhibit 4.2
Standard & Poor's Corporation
25 Broadway
New York, New York 10004-1064
Mr. Mark Kneedy
Chapman & Cutler
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Re: Insured Municipals Income Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series*
Dear Mr. Kneedy:
Pursuant to your request for a Standard & Poor's rating on the units of
the above-captioned trust, SEC #33-55885, we have reviewed the information
presented to us and have assigned a 'AAA' rating to the units of the trust and
a 'AAA' rating to the securities contained in the trust for as long as they
remain in the trust. The ratings are direct reflections, of the portfolio of
the trust, which will be composed solely of securities covered by bond
insurance policies that insure against default in the payment of principal and
interest on the securities so long as they remain in the trust. Since such
policies have been issued by one or more insurance companies which have been
assigned a 'AAA' claims paying ability rating by S&P, S&P has assigned a 'AAA'
rating to the units of the trust and to the securities contained in the trust
for as long as they remain in the trust.
You have permission to use the name of Standard & Poor's Corporation and
the above-assigned ratings in connection with your dissemination of
information relating to these units, provided that it is understood that the
ratings are not "market" ratings nor recommendations to buy, hold, or sell the
units of the trust or the securities contained in the trust. Further, it
should be understood the rating on the units does not take into account the
extent to which fund expenses or portfolio asset sales for less than the
fund's purchase price will reduce payment to the unit holders of the interest
and principal required to be paid on the portfolio assets. S&P reserves the
right to advise its own clients, subscribers, and the public of the ratings.
S&P relies on the sponsor and its counsel, accountants, and other experts for
the accuracy and completeness of the information submitted in connection with
the ratings. S&P does not independently verify the truth or accuracy of any
such information.
This letter evidences our consent to the use of the name of Standard &
Poor's Corporation in connection with the rating assigned to the units in the
registration statement or prospectus relating to the units or the trust.
However, this letter should not be construed as a consent by us, within the
meaning of Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, to the use of the name of
Standard & Poor's Corporation in connection with the ratings assigned to the
securities contained in the trust. You are hereby authorized to file a copy
of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Please be certain to send us three copies of your final prospectus as
soon as it becomes available. Should we not receive them within a reasonable
time after the closing or should they not conform to the representations made
to us, we reserve the right to withdraw the rating.
We are pleased to have had the opportunity to be of service to you. If
we can be of further help, please do not hesitate to call upon us.
Sincerely,
Vincent S. Orzo
*Consisting of:
California Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 133
Florida Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 85
Minnesota Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 54
New York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Intermediate Laddered Maturity
Series 13
New York Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 122
Pennsylvania Insured Municipals Income Trust, Series 194
Exhibit 4.3
Independent Certified Public Accountants' Consent
We have issued our report dated October 27, 1994 on the statements
of condition and related bond portfolios of Insured Municipals Income
Trust, 168th Insured Multi-Series (California IM-IT, Florida IM-IT,
Minnesota IM-IT, New York IM-IT Intermediate Laddered Maturity, New York
IM-IT and Pennsylvania IM-IT Trusts) as of October 27, 1994 contained in
the Registration Statement on Form S-6 and Prospectus. We consent to the
use of our report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus and to the
use of our name as it appears under the caption "Other Matters-Report of
Independent Certified Public Accountants".
Grant Thornton
Chicago, Illinois
October 27, 1994
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
This report reflects current period taken from 487 on October 27, 1994 it is
unaudited
</LEGEND>
<SERIES>
<NUMBER> 133
<NAME> INSURED CALIFORNIA
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> AUG-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> OCT-27-1994
<PERIOD-END> OCT-27-1994
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 2882320
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 2882320
<RECEIVABLES> 25184
<ASSETS-OTHER> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2907504
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES> 0
<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 2907504
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 3056
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 0
<NET-ASSETS> 951
<DIVIDEND-INCOME> 0
<INTEREST-INCOME> 0
<OTHER-INCOME> 0
<EXPENSES-NET> 0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME> 0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT> 0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS> 0
<EQUALIZATION> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED> 0
<SHARES-REINVESTED> 0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<GROSS-EXPENSE> 0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN> 0
<PER-SHARE-NII> 0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC> 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND> 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS> 0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END> 0
<EXPENSE-RATIO> 0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING> 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE> 0
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
This report reflects current period taken from 487 on October 27, 1994 it is
unaudited
</LEGEND>
<SERIES>
<NUMBER> 85
<NAME> INSURED FLORIDA
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> AUG-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> OCT-27-1994
<PERIOD-END> OCT-27-1994
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 2879206
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 2879206
<RECEIVABLES> 32681
<ASSETS-OTHER> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2911887
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 2042
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES> 0
<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 2909845
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 3058
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 0
<NET-ASSETS> 951
<DIVIDEND-INCOME> 0
<INTEREST-INCOME> 0
<OTHER-INCOME> 0
<EXPENSES-NET> 0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME> 0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT> 0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS> 0
<EQUALIZATION> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED> 0
<SHARES-REINVESTED> 0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<GROSS-EXPENSE> 0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN> 0
<PER-SHARE-NII> 0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC> 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND> 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS> 0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END> 0
<EXPENSE-RATIO> 0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING> 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE> 0
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
This report reflects current period taken from 487 on October 27, 1994 it is
unaudited
</LEGEND>
<SERIES>
<NUMBER> 13
<NAME> INTERMEDIATE LADDERED NEW YORK
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> AUG-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> OCT-27-1994
<PERIOD-END> OCT-27-1994
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 2914678
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 2914678
<RECEIVABLES> 31443
<ASSETS-OTHER> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2946121
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 6901
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES> 6901
<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 2939220
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 3000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 0
<NET-ASSETS> 980
<DIVIDEND-INCOME> 0
<INTEREST-INCOME> 0
<OTHER-INCOME> 0
<EXPENSES-NET> 0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME> 0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT> 0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS> 0
<EQUALIZATION> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED> 0
<SHARES-REINVESTED> 0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<GROSS-EXPENSE> 0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN> 0
<PER-SHARE-NII> 0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC> 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND> 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS> 0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END> 0
<EXPENSE-RATIO> 0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING> 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE> 0
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
This report reflects current period taken from 487 on October 27, 1994 it is
unaudited
</LEGEND>
<SERIES>
<NUMBER> 54
<NAME> INSURED MINNESOTA
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> AUG-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> OCT-27-1994
<PERIOD-END> OCT-27-1994
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 2942217
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 2942217
<RECEIVABLES> 50700
<ASSETS-OTHER> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2992917
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 19510
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES> 19510
<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 2973407
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 3125
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 0
<NET-ASSETS> 951
<DIVIDEND-INCOME> 0
<INTEREST-INCOME> 0
<OTHER-INCOME> 0
<EXPENSES-NET> 0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME> 0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT> 0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS> 0
<EQUALIZATION> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED> 0
<SHARES-REINVESTED> 0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<GROSS-EXPENSE> 0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN> 0
<PER-SHARE-NII> 0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC> 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND> 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS> 0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END> 0
<EXPENSE-RATIO> 0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING> 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE> 0
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
This report reflects current period taken from 487 on October 27, 1994 it is
unaudited
</LEGEND>
<SERIES>
<NUMBER> 122
<NAME> INSURED NEW YORK
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> AUG-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> OCT-27-1994
<PERIOD-END> OCT-27-1994
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 2911081
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 2911081
<RECEIVABLES> 53561
<ASSETS-OTHER> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2964642
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 21632
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES> 21632
<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 2943010
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 3093
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 0
<NET-ASSETS> 952
<DIVIDEND-INCOME> 0
<INTEREST-INCOME> 0
<OTHER-INCOME> 0
<EXPENSES-NET> 0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME> 0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT> 0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS> 0
<EQUALIZATION> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED> 0
<SHARES-REINVESTED> 0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<GROSS-EXPENSE> 0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN> 0
<PER-SHARE-NII> 0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC> 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND> 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS> 0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END> 0
<EXPENSE-RATIO> 0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING> 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE> 0
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
This report reflects current period taken from 487 on October 27, 1994 it is
unaudited
</LEGEND>
<SERIES>
<NUMBER> 194
<NAME> INSURED PENNSYLVANIA
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> AUG-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> OCT-27-1994
<PERIOD-END> OCT-27-1994
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 2921586
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 2921586
<RECEIVABLES> 56201
<ASSETS-OTHER> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2977787
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 24315
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES> 24315
<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 2953472
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 3104
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 0
<NET-ASSETS> 952
<DIVIDEND-INCOME> 0
<INTEREST-INCOME> 0
<OTHER-INCOME> 0
<EXPENSES-NET> 0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME> 0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT> 0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS> 0
<EQUALIZATION> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS> 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD> 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED> 0
<SHARES-REINVESTED> 0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS> 0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR> 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR> 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<GROSS-EXPENSE> 0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN> 0
<PER-SHARE-NII> 0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC> 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND> 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS> 0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL> 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END> 0
<EXPENSE-RATIO> 0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING> 0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE> 0
</TABLE>
