AT&T CAPITAL CORP /DE/, 10-K405, 1997-03-18

AT&T CAPITAL CORP /DE/
10-K405, 1997-03-18
FINANCE SERVICES

Previous: HERITAGE SERIES TRUST, 497, 1997-03-18

Next: CINERGY CORP, U-1, 1997-03-18

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For The Transition Period From ______________ to ______________

Commission File Number 1-11237

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION

A DELAWARE I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION
CORPORATION No. 22-3211453

44 Whippany Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1983
Telephone Number 201-397-3000

------------------

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES...x... NO.......

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]

No voting stock of this registrant is held by any non-affiliates of the
registrant. As of February 28, 1997, 90,337,379 shares of this registrant's
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

<PAGE>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item Description Page

1. Description of Business 1
2. Properties 15
3. Legal Proceedings 15
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders 15

PART II

5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters 16
6. Selected Financial Data 16
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 21
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 46
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure 89

PART III

10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 89
11. Executive Compensation 92
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management 100
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 102

PART IV

14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports
on Form 8-K 102

<PAGE>

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

RESTRUCTURING, INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING AND MERGER

AT&T Capital Corporation ("AT&T Capital" or the "Company") was incorporated
on December 21, 1992, as AT&T Leasing, Inc., and was renamed AT&T Capital
Corporation on March 31, 1993. The Company was the successor entity to certain
businesses of AT&T Capital Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as AT&T Capital
Corporation) ("Old Capital"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T Corp. ("AT&T"),
and its subsidiaries, including AT&T Credit Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as
AT&T Credit Corporation) ("Old Credit"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Old
Capital that commenced operations in 1985. In a restructuring that occurred on
March 31, 1993 (the "Restructuring"), Old Capital and Old Credit transferred
substantially all their assets, except for certain assets consisting principally
of equity interests in project finance transactions and leveraged leases of
commercial aircraft, in exchange for shares of the Company's common stock and
the assumption by the Company of certain related liabilities.

In connection with the Restructuring, AT&T issued direct, full and
unconditional guarantees of all existing indebtedness outstanding as of March
31, 1993 for borrowed money incurred, assumed or guaranteed by Old Capital
entitled to the benefit of a Support Agreement between AT&T and Old Capital,
including the debt of Old Capital assumed by the Company in the Restructuring.
Debt issued by the Company subsequent to March 31, 1993, however, is not
guaranteed or supported by AT&T (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements).

An initial public stock offering combined with a management stock offering
totaling approximately 14% of the Company's stock ("IPO") occurred on August 4,
1993. As a result of the IPO, approximately 86% of the outstanding common stock
of the Company was owned indirectly by AT&T (through Old Capital and Old
Credit.)

On September 20, 1995, AT&T announced a plan to pursue the public or
private sale of its remaining 86% interest in the Company. On such date, AT&T
also announced a plan to separate into three publicly-held stand-alone global
businesses: AT&T, Lucent Technologies Inc. ("Lucent") and NCR Corporation
("NCR") (herein collectively, "AT&T/Lucent/NCR" or the "Former Affiliates").

On June 5, 1996, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the "Merger Agreement") with AT&T, Hercules Limited (now known as Hercules
Holdings (Cayman) Limited) ("Hercules") and Antigua Acquisition Corporation
("Antigua"). Hercules is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of GRS Holding
Company Ltd.("GRSH"), which owns a U.K. rail leasing business. On October 1,
1996, the Company completed a merger (the "Merger") pursuant to which Antigua,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hercules, was merged with and into the Company.
As a result of the Merger, AT&T Capital's then shareowners received $45 in cash
for each outstanding share of the Company's common stock, and Hercules and
certain members of management ("the Management Investors") became the sole
owners of the Company's common stock.

<PAGE>

As of February 28, 1997 all of the outstanding common equity capital of the
Company was directly or indirectly owned by (i) the Management Investors,
including Thomas C. Wajnert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and 27 other members of the Company's senior management, and
(ii) GRSH. The Management Investors own 3.5% of the common stock (or
approximately 6.7% on a fully diluted basis) and GRSH indirectly owns 96.5% of
the common stock (or approximately 91.2% on a fully diluted basis). The
Company's employees and outside directors own approximately 2.1% of the common
stock on a fully diluted basis. GRSH, is 85% beneficially owned by Nomura
International plc, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of The Nomura Securities
Co., Ltd. ("Nomura"), and 9.5% beneficially owned by Babcock & Brown Holdings
Inc., a San Francisco based leasing, asset and project financing advisory
company, in each case, through instruments convertible into GRSH's capital
stock. The principal activities of Nomura, which was founded in 1925 in Osaka,
Japan and is currently Japan's largest securities brokerage house, include
securities brokerage, trading and investment banking in global financial
markets.

The aggregate purchase price for the then outstanding shares of the
Company's common stock and the aggregate amount necessary to cash-out the
Company's stock options in accordance with the Merger Agreement (the "Merger
Consideration") was approximately $2.2 billion. The Merger Consideration was
comprised of (i) a loan from Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. in the amount of
approximately $1.3 billion, which was to mature on October 30, 1996 and was
repaid by the Company from a portion of the proceeds of a $3.1 billion offering
of equipment receivable-backed securities by affiliates of the Company on
October 15, 1996 (see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and (ii)
equity contributions (collectively, the "Equity Contributions") represented by
(a) capital contributions of $871 million from Hercules, (b) the exchange by the
Management Investors of approximately $29 million and (c) the settlement of
approximately $5 million of recourse loans to senior executives. Also, in
connection with the Merger, the Company, through a consolidated subsidiary,
issued to the public $200 million of Company-obligated preferred securities (see
Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). For further discussion of
AT&T's sale of its remaining 86% interest in the Company see Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.

RELATIONSHIP WITH AT&T/LUCENT/NCR ENTITIES

As discussed above, in September 1995, AT&T announced plans to separate
itself into three publicly traded companies and to dispose of its approximately
86% equity interest in the Company to the general public or another company (the
"AT&T Restructuring"). Pursuant to the AT&T Restructuring, the Company
consummated the Merger which resulted in, among other things, the disposition by
AT&T of its remaining equity interest in the Company.

<PAGE>

In the first quarter of 1996, AT&T's telecommunications manufacturing and
marketing businesses were transferred to Lucent. On April 10, 1996 AT&T made a
public offering of approximately 17.6% of Lucent's shares. On September 30,
1996, AT&T spun off its entire remaining interest in Lucent to AT&T's
shareholders. Lucent's businesses involve the manufacture and distribution of
public telecommunications systems, business communications systems,
micro-electronic components, and consumer telecommunications products. On
December 31, 1996, AT&T distributed to its shareholders all of its interest in
NCR. NCR's businesses involve the manufacture and distribution of information
technology equipment, including automatic teller machines and point-of-sale
terminal equipment.

In connection with the Company's IPO in 1993, the Company entered into a
series of agreements with AT&T to formalize the relationship between the two
companies, including the following three significant agreements, each dated as
of June 25, 1993: (i) an Operating Agreement (the "AT&T Operating Agreement"),
(ii) an Intercompany Agreement (the "Intercompany Agreement") and (iii) a
License Agreement (the "License Agreement"). The Company has executed agreements
comparable to the AT&T Operating Agreement with each of Lucent and NCR (together
with the AT&T Operating Agreement, the "Operating Agreements"). In addition, the
Company has entered into letter agreements (the "Agreement Supplements") with
Lucent and NCR pursuant to which Lucent and NCR have agreed that various
provisions of the Intercompany Agreement and the License Agreement shall apply
equally to them.

The initial term of each of the Operating Agreements, the Intercompany
Agreement, the License Agreement and the Agreement Supplements is scheduled to
end on August 4, 2000. In addition, AT&T has the right under the License
Agreement, after two years' prior notice, to require the Company to discontinue
use of the "AT&T" trade name as part of the Company's corporate or "doing
business" name.

In 1996, approximately 37% and 68% of the Company's total revenues and net
income, respectively, were attributable, directly or indirectly, to
AT&T/Lucent/NCR.

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

AT&T Capital is a full-service, diversified equipment leasing and finance
company that operates in the United States, Europe, Canada, the Asia/Pacific
Region, Mexico and South America. The Company is one of the largest equipment
leasing and finance companies in the United States based on the aggregate value
of equipment leased or financed.

The Company, through its various subsidiaries, leases and finances
equipment manufactured and distributed by numerous vendors, including AT&T/
Lucent/NCR. In addition, the Company provides equipment leasing and financing
and related services directly to end-user customers. The Company's customers
include large global companies, small and mid-size businesses and federal, state
and local governments and their agencies.

<PAGE>

AT&T Capital leases and finances a wide variety of equipment including
telecommunications equipment (such as private branch exchanges, telephone
systems and voice processing units), information technology (such as personal
computers, retail point-of-sale systems, and automatic teller machines), general
office, manufacturing and medical equipment ("General Equipment"), and
transportation equipment (primarily vehicles), and also finances real estate
(including real estate related loans in the Company's Small Business
Administration ("SBA") lending and franchise finance businesses). The Company is
the largest lessor of telecommunications equipment in the United States based on
the aggregate value of equipment leased or financed.

At December 31, 1996, the Company's net portfolio assets (net investment in
finance receivables, capital leases and operating leases), which aggregated $7.2
billion, were diversified across various types of financed equipment: general
equipment 27%; transportation equipment 23%; information technology 22%; and
telecommunications equipment 18%; as well as real estate 10%.

The Company leases and finances such equipment through a variety of
financing and related products and services, including capital leases, operating
leases, inventory financing and other collateralized working capital loans for
equipment dealers and distributors, SBA lending, asset based loans and equipment
management and remarketing services. In addition, the Company offers its
customers certain equipment rental and administration services.

AT&T Capital's portfolio assets are diversified among a large customer
base, as well as numerous industries and geographic regions. The Company has one
of the largest customer bases in the commercial equipment leasing and finance
market, aggregating approximately 500,000 customers in its owned and managed
portfolios. At December 31, 1996, on an owned basis, the Company's 98 largest
customers (after AT&T and Lucent) accounted for approximately 24% of the
Company's net portfolio assets, and no single customer (with the exception of
AT&T and Lucent) accounted for more than 1% of such net portfolio assets.

Although the Company operates principally in the United States, the Company
began operations in the United Kingdom in 1991 and Canada in 1992, acquired a
business in Hong Kong in 1994 and opened offices in Mexico and Australia in
1994. The Company continues to expand globally in response to the needs of its
vendor clients.

In January 1995, the Company acquired the vendor leasing and finance
companies of Banco Central Hispano and certain of its affiliates (collectively,
"CFH Leasing International") located in the United Kingdom, Germany, France,
Italy, Belgium, and the Netherlands. This European network of leasing operations
provides financial services to equipment manufacturers and vendors. It served
approximately 4,600 customers and had approximately $540 million in assets at
the time of acquisition. In June 1995, the Company also acquired an Australian
equipment finance company with approximately $40 million in assets. In the third
quarter of 1995, the Company entered into a joint venture with Banco Frances, a
leading Argentine commercial bank, to operate an equipment leasing operation in
Argentina.

<PAGE>

In the third quarter of 1996, the Company acquired the operating assets and
lease portfolio of Municipal Leasing Corporation. This Canadian operation has
been financing office equipment and automobiles for the past 15 years and had
approximately $160 million in assets at the time of the acquisition.

The Company, from time to time, investigates potential opportunities to
make acquisitions both domestically and abroad. In addition, the Company may
open offices on a limited basis either directly or through acquisitions or joint
ventures.

For a discussion regarding the Company's total assets, revenues and net
income attributable to leasing and financing AT&T/Lucent/NCR equipment provided
to customers of AT&T/Lucent/NCR, to AT&T/Lucent/NCR and their employees as
end-user and the Company's non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses, see the Results of
Operations section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. For a discussion regarding the Company's
foreign operations, see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Marketing and Business Activities

The Company offers a wide range of financial products and services to its
customers through two principal marketing channels. The first, which the Company
refers to as "Global Vendor Finance", provides leasing and financing services,
together with related services, to customers of its equipment vendor clients
(i.e., manufacturers, dealers and distributors) with which the Company has an
ongoing marketing relationship. With the second approach, "Direct Customer
Finance", the Company provides leasing and financing services, together with
related services, directly to its small, mid-size and large business customers.

GLOBAL VENDOR FINANCE

The Company's vendor finance marketing activities commenced in 1985 when
the Company's predecessor (Old Credit) was organized to provide financing and
related support to equipment customers of AT&T. Since then, the Company has
established on-going relationships with other select manufacturers and
distributors that seek to increase equipment sales, gain customer loyalty,
enhance their control over the marketing life cycle of their products through
the use of customized financing programs, and leave the management of credit and
residual risks to AT&T Capital. The Company offers its vendor clients one of the
most extensive global financing networks in the equipment leasing and finance
industry.

AT&T/Lucent/NCR

AT&T (including Lucent) was the Company's original and largest vendor
client. Since AT&T's 1991 merger with NCR, NCR has been part of this vendor
client. Historically, the Company has financed (for the customers of
AT&T/Lucent/NCR) a large volume of the Former Affiliates' telecommunications
and information technology equipment. See the Competition and Related Matters
section below.

<PAGE>

In the first quarter of 1996, AT&T's telecommunications manufacturing and
marketing businesses were transferred to Lucent. On April 10, 1996 AT&T made a
public offering of approximately 17.6% of Lucent's shares. On September 30, 1996
AT&T distributed to its shareowners its remaining equity interest in Lucent. On
December 31, 1996, AT&T spun-off its 100% interest in NCR to AT&T shareowners.

During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company generated $1.1 billion
of financing volume from Lucent and NCR related vendor finance activities. Of
this financing volume, 76% was related to Lucent and 24% was related to NCR.

To facilitate the financing of sales of the Former Affiliates' equipment,
the Company has connected its data and telecommunications systems with those of
the Former Affiliates' sales and marketing offices and maintains personnel and
equipment at the Former Affiliates' sales and marketing sites. The Company uses
these linkages, personnel and equipment in conjunction with its competitive
strengths (e.g., credit scoring capabilities) and its personnel and equipment
based at its own sites to provide high volume processing capabilities that
enable the Company to serve large numbers of customers on an efficient and
timely basis. In addition, these linkages permit the Former Affiliates to
invoice the Company electronically for certain types of telecommunications and
information technology equipment and permit the Company to pay invoices
electronically.

Other Vendor Clients

In serving the Former Affiliates' vendor finance needs over the past
decade, the Company has developed core competencies in vendor program
development and administration, credit analysis, equipment residual management,
sales support, and high volume small-ticket processing. The Company has
leveraged these skills in developing similar vendor finance programs for other
large manufacturers and distributors. The Company's non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR global
vendor activities are strategically focused on four equipment markets: (i)
computer technology; (ii) medical; (iii) material handling and manufacturing;
and (iv) document imaging and printing.

The Company has enhanced its relationships with vendor clients by
providing: a variety of customer financing products; sales aid services,
including the training of vendor personnel and point-of-sale support; private
label programs, in which the Company provides financing to the vendor's
customers under the vendor's name; customer operations support and interfaces;
alternate channel programs (distribution channels not involving the vendor's
direct sales force); inventory financing; and support for value-added retailers
or distributors (retailers or distributors that modify products and re-sell
them). AT&T Capital's management believes its ability to identify creditworthy
accounts represents a strategic competitive resource to vendors seeking to
increase sales without increasing their personnel costs. In addition, the
Company's high volume processing capabilities, relationship-based transaction
skills and residual assessment, equipment management and marketing expertise
provide vendors with competitive pricing and enhanced customer account control
after sales close.

<PAGE>

During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company generated $1.7 billion
of financing volume from its non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR Global Vendor Finance
activities.

DIRECT CUSTOMER FINANCE

The Company's Direct Customer Finance activities are a logical extension of
its Global Vendor Finance activities. The Company's Global Vendor Finance
activities have laid the foundation for what management believes is one of the
largest customer bases in the commercial equipment leasing and finance market,
aggregating approximately 500,000 customers in its owned and managed portfolios.
This customer base provides the Company with the opportunity to offer these
customers additional financing and equipment management services. Direct
Customer Finance activities are broken into two groups: "Commercial Finance and
Leasing" and "Specialized Equipment Financing and Services".

Commercial Finance and Leasing

The Company leverages its large customer base, sophisticated transaction
structuring skills, and high volume transaction processing capabilities to
provide niche financial services directly to business customers (including the
Former Affiliates and their employees). AT&T Capital targets small and
medium-size companies in the United States with a wide range of products
including SBA loans, asset based loans, franchise financing, and other financing
products (such as pre-approved credit lines). In addition, the Company serves
large commercial customers by providing highly structured transactions and
project financing solutions.

For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company generated $1.3 billion of
financing volumes from its commercial finance and leasing activities.

Specialized Equipment Financing and Services

The Company's specialized equipment knowledge and effective equipment
management competencies have been integral to its success in executing its
Global Vendor Finance and Direct Customer Finance strategies. Building on its
equipment knowledge and management skills, the Company has identified related
growth opportunities in managing and financing specialized equipment for
customers.

The Company's specialized equipment financing activities have been
concentrated in vehicle and computer leasing markets. The Company's equipment
management services have included procurement, tracking, deployment and
remarketing of equipment. AT&T Capital has principally focused its specialized
equipment management and remarketing services in the following markets: (i)
vehicle and high technology equipment leasing and financing; (ii) vehicle fleet
management; and (iii) high technology equipment rental and related services.

For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company generated $1.1 billion of
financing volumes from its specialized financing activities.

<PAGE>

The following table shows approximate financing volumes and total assets
for each of the Former Affiliates and other global vendor marketing channels and
the commercial finance and leasing and specialized equipment financing services
components of the direct customer marketing channel as a percentage of total
Company financing volumes for the year ended December 31, 1996 and total Company
assets as of December 31, 1996.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Financing Total
Volume Assets
<S> <C> <C>
Global Vendor
Former Affiliates 22% 20%
Other Vendor Clients 32% 25%
Direct Customer
Commercial
Finance & Leasing 24% 29%
Specialized Equipment
Financing Services 22% 26%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Income Tax Considerations

As a result of the Merger, the Company is no longer a member of AT&T's
consolidated group for federal income tax purposes. The Company ceased being a
member of such consolidated group for federal income tax purposes (the "Tax
Deconsolidation") upon the consummation of the Merger (see Notes 1 and 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements).

When the Company was a part of the AT&T consolidated federal income tax
group, the payment of federal income taxes associated with sales of products
manufactured by AT&T/Lucent/NCR was deferred (the amount of such taxes so
deferred being herein called "Gross Profit Tax Deferral"), generally as the
products were depreciated or until sold outside the group. Pursuant to the Gross
Profit Tax Deferral Interest Free Loan Agreement between the Company and AT&T,
AT&T had agreed to extend and had extended interest-free loans to the Company
from time to time in an amount equal to the then outstanding amount of Gross
Profit Tax Deferral. Such loans, the outstanding balance of which totaled $247.4
million as of September 30, 1996, were repaid by the Company immediately prior
to Tax Deconsolidation as required by the agreement. The Company no longer
receives such loans, which had constituted a competitive advantage to the
Company in financing AT&T products.

Pursuant to the Federal Tax Sharing and the State Tax Sharing Agreements
between the Company and AT&T, the AT&T consolidated federal income tax liability
was generally allocated among the members of the AT&T consolidated group that
reported taxable income. Members of the AT&T consolidated group that reported
tax losses were compensated by AT&T (through cash payments made on a quarterly
basis) for their losses to the extent those losses were used to reduce the AT&T
consolidated federal income tax liability. Similar principles and cash payments
also applied to certain state and local income tax liabilities.

<PAGE>

Upon Tax Deconsolidation, the Company is no longer entitled to receive
quarterly cash payments from AT&T as compensation for the use of any tax losses.
The tax losses, instead, are available to the Company to reduce future taxable
income. Thus, the Company may derive a benefit in the future from tax losses,
but only to the extent the Company has taxable income in later years. In 1996,
on a stand-alone basis, the Company had taxable income. (See Note 12 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements.)

In addition, following Tax Deconsolidation, it is possible that the Company
could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. A Company's alternative
minimum tax liability is computed by applying the alternative minimum tax rate,
which is lower than the regular tax rate, to a measure of taxable income that is
broader than that used in computing the regular tax. Payments of any alternative
minimum tax incurred by the Company after a Tax Deconsolidation would be
available in the future as credits against the Company's regular tax liability.

The following table shows the components of the Company's allowance for
credit losses related to (i) lease financing (capital leases and rentals
receivable on operating leases) from United States operations, (ii) finance
receivables from United States operations and (iii) lease financing and finance
receivables from foreign operations; collectively "finance assets". In addition,
other key credit quality indicators, by loan type, are also provided. The
breakdown of the allowance for credit losses at each year-end reflects
management's estimate of credit losses and may not be indicative of actual
future charge-offs by loan classification.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Thousands)
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning
of year:
- - Lease Financing-U.S. $144,666 $113,735 $ 95,196 $ 86,086 $ 74,019
- - Finance Receivables-U.S. 52,607 46,637 56,974 36,139 19,861
- - Foreign 25,947 16,056 7,649 1,736 87
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 223,220 176,428 159,819 123,961 93,967
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additions Charged
to Operations:
- - Lease Financing-U.S. 69,931 66,505 62,447 91,605 87,156
- - Finance Receivables-U.S. 27,916 15,167 13,488 28,604 23,090
- - Foreign 15,758 4,542 4,953 3,469 1,469
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 113,605 86,214 80,888 123,678 111,715
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge-offs:
- Lease Financing-U.S. 83,885 48,834 47,585 61,233 76,462
- Finance Receivables-U.S. 14,582 10,446 22,908 14,135 18,183
- Foreign 7,278 5,595 3,024 284 125
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 105,745 64,875 73,517 75,652 94,770

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Recoveries:
- - Lease Financing-U.S. 15,507 13,944 14,666 15,505 14,913
- - Finance Receivables-U.S. 1,495 1,403 1,561 1,118 1,365
- - Foreign 2,431 2,758 1,745 - 125
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 19,433 18,105 17,972 16,623 16,403
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Charge-offs:
- - Lease Financing-U.S. 68,378 34,890 32,919 45,728 61,549
- - Finance Receivables-U.S. 13,087 9,043 21,347 13,017 16,818
- - Foreign 4,847 2,837 1,279 284 -
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 86,312 46,770 55,545 59,029 78,367
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transfers and Other (a):
- - Lease Financing-U.S. (64,096) (684) (10,989) (36,767) (13,540)
- - Finance Receivables-U.S. (16,586) (154) (2,478) 5,248 10,006
- - Foreign (845) 8,186 4,733 2,728 180
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (81,527) 7,348 (8,734) (28,791) (3,354)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year:
- - Lease Financing-U.S. 82,123 144,666 113,735 95,196 86,086
- - Finance Receivables-U.S. 50,850 52,607 46,637 56,974 36,139
- - Foreign 36,013 25,947 16,056 7,649 1,736
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $168,986 $223,220 $176,428 $159,819 $123,961
===========================================================================
Percentage of loan
types to total
finance assets:
- - Lease Financing-U.S. 41.3% 62.2% 67.9% 70.6% 73.3%
- - Finance Receivables-U.S. 33.2% 20.8% 21.5% 23.1% 24.9%
- - Foreign 25.5% 17.0% 10.6% 6.3% 1.8%
===========================================================================
Ratio of Net Charge-offs
during the year to
average finance assets:
outstanding during the year:
- Lease Financing-U.S. 1.49% 0.73% 0.78% 1.27% 1.94%
- Finance Receivables-U.S. 0.70% 0.58% 1.69% 1.13% 1.53%
- Foreign 0.32% 0.24% 0.22% 0.15% -
===========================================================================

Nonaccrual assets $135,085 $118,484 $120,494 $160,574 $151,562
===========================================================================
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

(a) Primarily includes transfers out of allowance for credit losses related to
receivables securitized, transfers in of reserves related to businesses
acquired and reclassifications.

The ratio of net charge-offs to average Lease Financing assets increased in
1996 compared with 1995, while the allowance for credit losses decreased over
the same period. These changes were due to the significant reduction in the
Lease Financing portfolios due to the significant increase in securitizations in
1996. In addition, assets securitized generally include only those transactions
not more than 60 days past due; therefore, the owned portfolio reflects a higher
proportion of delinquent receivables which results in a higher charge-off ratio.
Furthermore, the securitizations generally comprise receivables from the
Company's small-ticket lease portfolios which carry a higher allowance for
credit losses/portfolio asset ratio compared to the overall ratio. As a result,
the Company's overall allowance for credit losses/portfolio assets ratio
decreases when such small-ticket receivables are sold. The allowance for credit
losses decreased primarily to the reclassification of certain amounts to
securitization recourse reserves. The ratio of net charge-offs to average
Finance Receivables increased while the allowance for credit losses decreased in
1996 compared to 1995, due to a large financing written-off in 1996 which was
substantially reserved for in 1995.

The ratio of net charge-offs to average Finance Receivables increased in
1994 compared with 1993, while the allowance for credit losses decreased in 1994
compared with 1993 due to reserves established for specific assets (particularly
in the media portfolio) that were subsequently charged off in 1994. As a result,
in 1994 there were fewer assets that required specific reserves.

For a further discussion regarding credit quality and the Company's
portfolio credit performance indicators, see the Credit Quality section of
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.

Accounts are placed in nonaccrual status at 90 days past due or sooner if
identified as a problem account. Revenue which would have been recorded in 1996
on nonaccrual U.S. and Foreign assets had these assets been earning at the
original contractual rate amounted to approximately $10.9 million and $1.4
million, respectively. Revenue actually recognized in 1996 on U.S. and Foreign
assets in nonaccrual status at December 31, 1996 amounted to approximately $6.3
million and $1.0 million, respectively.

Lease terms that are modified in the normal course of business, for which
additional consideration is received or insignificant concessions are made, are
accounted for as changes in a provision for a lease in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 13, "Accounting for Leases".
Pursuant to SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditor for Impairment of a Loan" and
No.118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and
Disclosures", the amount of impaired loans at December 31, 1996 is not material
(see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

<PAGE>

Residual Value Realization

The establishment and realization of residual values on leases are also
important elements of the Company's business. The Company's residual management
capabilities include its equipment remarketing skills, its in-house equipment
refurbishment facilities and its knowledge of developing technologies, products
and obsolescence trends. These competencies are used in setting residual values
upon the acquisition and leasing of the equipment based on the estimated value
of the equipment at the end of the lease term. These estimates are determined by
the Company from, among other things, on-going studies prepared by the Company,
professional appraisals, historical experience and industry data, market
information on sales of used equipment, the ability to upgrade and enhance
equipment value over lease term, end-of-lease customer behavior plus projections
of new product introductions and obsolescence trends.

The Company strategically manages its owned and securitized portfolios to
ensure a broad diversification of residual risk by equipment type and lease
expiration. The Company's risk management department, in conjunction with
equipment experts in the Company's business units, regularly reviews residual
values, and if they have declined, adjustments are made that result in an
immediate charge to income for capital leases (and residuals where the
associated receivables have been securitized) and adjustments to depreciation
expense for operating leases over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or
the remaining term of the lease. On an aggregate basis, the Company has
historically realized proceeds from the sale or re-leasing of equipment during
the lease term and at lease termination in excess of the Company's recorded
residual values. However, there can be no assurance that such results will be
realized in future years. The Company recognizes in total revenues, amounts in
excess of recorded residuals over the re-lease term, or upon the sale or other
disposition of leased equipment.

The Company actively manages its residuals by working with lessees and
vendors during the lease term to encourage lessees to extend their leases or
upgrade and enhance their leased equipment, as appropriate, and by monitoring
the various equipment industries, particularly the information technology
industries, for obsolescence trends and remarketing opportunities. The Company
utilizes its equipment management (including equipment remarketing), engineering
and other technical expertise to help manage its residual positions.

<PAGE>

The following table shows projected residual expirations, as an approximate
percentage of aggregate recorded residuals as of December 31, 1996, by equipment
type for the Company's owned and securitized portfolios, for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 and thereafter:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Equipment Type 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001+ Totals
---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Telecommunications 5% 6% 7% 6% 6% 30%
Information Technology 7% 7% 8% 2% 1% 25%
Transportation 5% 6% 6% 2% 7% 26%
General Equipment & other 3% 4% 4% 3% 5% 19%
--- --- --- --- --- ----
Total 20% 23% 25% 13% 19% 100%
</TABLE>

Competition and Related Matters

The equipment leasing and finance industry is highly competitive.
Participants in the industry compete through price (including the ability to
control costs), risk management, innovation and customer service. Principal cost
factors include the cost of funds, the cost of selling to or obtaining new
end-user customers and vendors, and the cost of managing portfolios (including,
for example, billing, collection, credit risk management, and residual
management). Adequate risk management is required to achieve satisfactory
returns on investment and to provide appropriate pricing of financing products.
The Company believes that innovation is necessary to compete in the industry,
involving specialization in certain types of equipment, financial structuring
for larger transactions, utilization of alternative channels of distribution and
optimization of tax treatment between owner and user. In addition, end-users of
equipment generally desire transactions to be simple, flexible and meet the
customer needs.

In its leasing and financing operations and programs, the Company competes
with captive or related leasing companies (such as General Electric Capital
Corporation and IBM Credit Corporation), independent leasing companies (such as
Comdisco, Inc.), certain banks engaged in leasing, lease brokers and investment
banking firms that arrange for the financing of leased equipment, and
manufacturers and vendors who lease their own products to customers. In
addition, the Company competes with all banking and other financial
institutions, manufacturers, vendors and others who extend or arrange credit for
the acquisition of equipment, and in a sense, with end-users' available cash
resources to purchase equipment that the Company may otherwise finance. Many of
the competitors of the Company are large companies that have substantial
capital, technological and marketing resources; some of these competitors are
significantly larger than the Company and have access to debt at a lower cost
than the Company.

There continue to be substantial changes in the equipment leasing and
finance industry, including the sale or cessation of operations of competitors
of the Company and an apparent trend toward consolidation. While these
developments may on balance be favorable for the Company's prospects, they are
indicative of the strong competitive pressures on all participants in the
industry, including the Company.

<PAGE>

The Company's penetration rate for Lucent's sales of telecommunications
equipment in the United States (i.e., the percentage of the dollar volume of
such sales that the Company finances) was approximately 38% for the year ended
December 31, 1996. The Company does not expect material increases in this
penetration rate, and there can be no assurance that the existing rate will be
maintained. The Company's penetration rate for NCR's sales of data processing
and related products, including data warehousing computers, retail point-of-sale
computers, and automatic teller machines was approximately 15% for the year
ended December 31, 1996. Additionally, the Company has an insignificant
penetration rate with respect to international sales of Lucent's network systems
products (large telecommunications switches, cable products, cellular telephone
equipment and microwave dishes and equipment), which sales the Company has been
financing for a relatively short period of time. Because the markets for
financing these products are highly competitive and substantially different from
the markets for financing telecommunications equipment in the United States,
there can be no assurance that the penetration rates in these product areas will
increase.

In addition to competition within the leasing and financing industry,
competition experienced in the Former Affiliates' industries may adversely
affect the Company because of the significance to the Company of its business
with customers of the Former Affiliates. Those industries are highly competitive
and subject to rapid changes in technology and customer needs. Many of the
Former Affiliates' competitors are large companies that have substantial
capital, technology and marketing resources.

In addition, the Regional Bell Operating Companies (the "RBOCs"), which
have historically been prohibited from manufacturing telecommunications
equipment will be permitted to manufacture such equipment and compete with
Lucent, subject to satisfying certain conditions, pursuant to telecommunications
legislation recently enacted by Congress. It is possible that one or more of the
RBOCs may decide to manufacture telecommunications equipment or form alliances
with other manufacturers. Either of such developments could result in increased
competition for Lucent, reduce the RBOCs' purchases of equipment from Lucent,
and consequently, adversely impact the Company's financing volumes.

While the Company is not able to fully predict whether Lucent's and NCR's
separation from AT&T and the cessation of their use of the "AT&T" brand name
will affect their equipment sales, any resulting change in the level of
equipment sales by Lucent and NCR would likely have a corresponding impact on
the Company's future financing volumes associated with such sales.

Employees

AT&T Capital had approximately 3,000 employees as of February 28, 1997,
each of whom is referred to within the Company as a "member". Titles are not
used internally. In general, members function using a team approach, with
business generally conducted on a collaborative rather than hierarchical basis.
Management believes that its members are skilled and highly motivated and that
the Company's ability to achieve its objectives depends upon their efforts and
competencies. None of the Company's members are represented by a union. The
Company believes that its relations with its members are good.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company's properties consist primarily of administrative offices,
warehouses for the storage and refurbishment of equipment and a number of
geographically dispersed sales offices. The Company has its headquarters in
Morristown, New Jersey, with its principal domestic offices and warehouses
located in Morristown and Parsippany, New Jersey; Framingham, Massachusetts;
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan; Towson, Maryland; and Dallas, Texas. The Company's
principal international offices are in London, England; Toronto, Canada; Hong
Kong; Sydney, Australia; Mexico City, Mexico; Brussels, Belgium; Frankfurt,
Germany; Milan, Italy; and Paris, France. All these offices and warehouses are
leased (some being subleased from the Former Affiliates), except for one
building (of approximately 9,000 square feet) in Framingham, Massachusetts,
owned by a subsidiary of the Company. This building is designed as office space
and storage and is sublet to a nonaffiliated company. The Company considers its
present locations suitable and adequate to carry on its current business.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is not currently a party to any pending litigation nor is the
Company aware of any threatened litigation which in the opinion of the Company's
management will have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial
condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY-HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of 1996.

<PAGE>

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS

(a) Market Information
Until October 1, 1996, (the date of the Merger) (see Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements), the principal market on which the
common stock of the Company was traded was the New York Stock Exchange
("NYSE"). The Company is currently directly or indirectly owned by
certain members of management and GRS Holding Company Limited. Since
October 1, 1996, there has been no established public trading market
for the Company's common stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Quarter Ended Quarterly Stock Prices Dividends
declared
per share

High Low
<S> <C> <C> <C>

March 31, 1995 $27.250 $21.625 $0.10
June 30, 1995 $27.750 $24.000 $0.10
September 30, 1995 $38.625 $27.125 $0.10
December 31, 1995 $40.375 $35.750 $0.11
March 31, 1996 $44.000 $38.125 $0.11
June 30, 1996 $44.000 $36.625 $0.11
September 30, 1996 $44.875 $43.750 $0.11
December 31, 1996* $44.875 $44.875 $(c)
</TABLE>

* As discussed above, there is no longer an established public trading
market for the Company's common stock is no longer traded on the NYSE.
The fourth quarter "high" and "low" price is as of October 1, 1996,
the last day of trading.

(b) Holders
As of February 28, 1997, there were 29 holders of record of the
Company's common stock.

(c) Dividends
As a result of the Merger, it is anticipated that the Company will no
longer pay quarterly dividends in the short-term.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The Results of Operations Data for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995,
1994, 1993, 1992, 1991 and 1990, as well as the Balance Sheet Data and Other
Data at December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992 and 1991, are derived from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company at such dates and for such
periods, which have been audited by Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent
accountants. The Results of Operations Data for the years ended December 31,
1989, 1988 and 1987, as well as the Balance Sheet Data and Other Data at
December 30, 1990, 1989, 1988 and 1987, are derived from unaudited consolidated
financial information. In management's opinion, the Company's unaudited
consolidated financial statements at or for the years ended December 31, 1990,
1989, 1988 and 1987, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation.

<PAGE>

The selected financial data as presented below should be read in
conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes thereto.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>

Results of Operations Data:
Total revenues $1,952,190 $1,577,035 $1,384,079 $1,359,589 $1,265,526
Interest expense 458,039 411,040 271,812 236,335 252,545
Operating and
administrative
expenses 564,489 473,663 427,187 381,515 359,689
Provision for credit
losses 113,605 86,214 80,888 123,678 111,715
Income before income
taxes, cumulative
effect on prior years
of accounting change
and impact of tax
rate change 278,602 208,239 173,614 138,040 114,875
Income before cumu-
lative effect on prior
years of accounting
change and impact of
tax rate change 168,539 127,555 100,336 83,911 73,572
Cumulative effect on
prior years of
accounting change (1) - - - (2,914) -
Impact of 1993 tax rate
change (1) - - - 12,401) -
Net income (1) 168,539 127,555 100,336 68,596 73,572
Dividends paid (2) $ 15,490 $ 19,231 $ 17,338 $ 4,216 $ 49,632
Return on average
equity 15.9% 12.1% 10.5% 8.5% 11.4%
Return on average
assets 1.8% 1.5% 1.4% 1.1% 1.3%
Return on average equity
before tax charges (3) 15.9% 12.1% 10.5% 10.3% 11.4%
Return on average assets
before tax charges (3) 1.8% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance Sheet Data, at December 31:
Total assets $8,092,512 $9,541,259 $8,021,923 $6,409,726 $5,895,429
Total debt(4) 6,464,924 6,928,409 5,556,458 4,262,405 4,089,483
Total liabilities 7,185,205 8,425,134 7,013,705 5,485,283 5,158,808
Preferred
Securities(5) 200,000 - - - -
Total shareowners'
equity $ 707,307 $1,116,125 $1,008,218 $ 924,443 $ 736,621
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands) 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Results of Operations Data:
Total revenues $ 1,160,150 $ 881,183 $ 466,508 $ 319,029 $ 259,716
Interest expense 275,650 262,646 177,474 130,913 93,275
Operating and
administrative
expenses 298,833 193,882 118,430 90,528 76,752
Provision for credit
losses 108,635 75,508 32,222 19,135 39,227
Income before income
taxes, cumulative
effect on prior years
of accounting change
and impact of tax
rate change 82,559 70,891 59,346 47,306 40,269
Income before cumu-
lative effect on prior
years of accounting
change and impact of
tax rate change 54,199 47,755 44,416 30,756 26,147
Cumulative effect on
prior years of
accounting change (1) - - - - -
Impact of 1993 tax rate
change (1) - - - - -
Net income (1) 54,199 47,755 44,416 30,756 26,147
Dividends paid(2) $ 55,512 $ 34,423 $ 17,746 $ 28,192 $ 24,674
Return on average
equity 10.7% 11.0% 12.7% 11.5% 11.8%
Return on average
assets 1.1% 1.1% 1.4% 1.2% 1.3%
Return on average equity
before tax charges (3) 10.7% 11.0% 12.7% 11.5% 11.8%
Return on average assets
before tax charges (3) 1.1% 1.1% 1.4% 1.2% 1.3%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance Sheet Data, at December 31:
Total assets $5,197,245 $4,722,694 $3,836,799 $2,715,592 $2,324,695
Total debt(4) 3,594,247 3,312,421 2,742,843 1,692,556 1,640,879
Total liabilities 4,647,979 4,257,186 3,435,792 2,417,280 2,074,198
Preferred Securities(5) - - - - -
Total shareowners'
equity $ 549,266 $ 465,508 $ 401,007 $ 298,312 $ 250,497

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

At or for the years ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Other Data:
Net portfolio assets
of the Company $7,187,451 $ 9,105,403 $7,484,798 $6,076,805 $5,600,741
Allowance for credit
losses 168,986 223,220 176,428 159,819 123,961
Total owned and
managed assets 12,883,484 11,755,761 10,681,449 9,205,389 7,269,783
Volume of equipment
financed (6) $5,245,000 $4,567,000 $4,251,000 $3,467,000 $3,253,000
Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges (7) 1.60x 1.50x 1.62x 1.57x 1.44x
Ratio of total debt to
shareowners' equity plus
Preferred Securities(5) 7.13x 6.22x 5.51x 4.61x 5.55x
Ratio of allowance for
credit losses to net
charge-offs 1.96x 4.77x 3.18x 2.71x 1.58x
Ratio of net charge-offs
to portfolio assets 1.17% 0.50% 0.73% 0.95% 1.37%
Ratio of allowance for
credit losses to
portfolio assets 2.30% 2.39% 2.30% 2.56% 2.17%
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At or for the years ended December 31,
1991 1990 1989 1988 1987
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Other Data:
Net portfolio assets
of the Company $4,956,830 $4,513,280 $3,228,609 $2,529,834 $2,094,593
Allowance for credit
losses 93,967 75,369 37,868 42,733 52,695
Total owned and
managed assets 5,846,259 5,036,675 3,938,802 2,734,121 2,324,695
Volume of equipment
financed (6) $2,453,000 $2,300,000 $1,729,000 $1,489,000 $1,409,000
Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges (7) 1.29x 1.26x 1.33x 1.36x 1.43x
Ratio of total debt to
shareowners' equity plus
Preferred Securities(5) 6.54x 7.12x 6.84x 5.67x 6.55x
Ratio of allowance for
credit losses to net
charge-offs 1.15x 1.62x 1.02x 1.47x 3.04x
Ratio of net charge-offs
to portfolio assets 1.62% 1.01% 1.13% 1.13% 0.81%
Ratio of allowance for
credit losses
to portfolio assets 1.86% 1.64% 1.16% 1.66% 2.45%
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

(1) Net income for 1993 was adversely impacted by the federal tax rate increase
to 35% ($12.4 million) and a cumulative effect on prior years of accounting
change ($2.9 million). Net income without these charges for 1993 would have been
$83.9 million.

(2) As a result of the Merger, it is anticipated that the Company will no longer
pay dividends in the short-term.

(3) The Company defines return on average equity before tax charges and return
on average assets before tax charges, as income before cumulative effect on
prior years of accounting change and impact of tax rate change as a percentage
of average equity and average assets, respectively.

(4) Does not include certain interest free loans from AT&T to the Company under
certain tax agreements, in aggregate outstanding principal amounts of $0, $248.9
million, $214.1 million, $188.6 million, $193.1 million, $206.6 million, $239.6
million, $232.6 million, $244.5 million and $209.0 million at December 31, 1996,
1995, 1994, 1993, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1988 and 1987, respectively.

(5) The Company, through a consolidated subsidiary, issued to the public eight
million shares of Company-obligated preferred securities (the "Preferred
Securities") (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(6) Total principal amount of loans and total cost of equipment associated with
finance and lease transactions recorded by the Company and the change in
outstanding inventory financing and asset based loans.

(7) Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect on prior years of
accounting change plus the sum of interest on indebtedness and the portion of
rentals representative of the interest factor (the "fixed charges") divided by
the fixed charges. In connection with the Merger, the portion of the Company's
indebtedness to AT&T which did not bear interest, the GPTD loan, was repaid
(see Notes 1 and 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

<PAGE>

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

When included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the words, "will",
"should", "expects", "intends", "anticipates", "estimates" and similar
expressions, among others, identify forward looking statements for purposes of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"). Such statements, which include statements contained in this
Item 7, inherently are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in such
statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, those described
below under "Risk Factors", many of which are beyond the control of AT&T Capital
Corporation (the "Company"). These forward looking statements are made only as
of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company expressly disclaims
any obligation or undertaking to release any update or revision to any forward
looking statement contained herein to reflect any change in the Company's
expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any statement is based.

On June 5, 1996, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger,
with AT&T, Hercules Limited (now known as Hercules Holdings (Cayman) Limited)
("Hercules") and Antigua Acquisition Corporation ("Antigua"). Hercules is owned
by Hercules Holdings (UK) Limited, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary
of GRS Holding Company, Ltd. ("GRSH"), a U.K. rail leasing business.

As of February 28, 1997 all of the outstanding common equity capital of
the Company was directly or indirectly owned by (i) the Management Investors
(as defined herein), including Thomas C. Wajnert, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and 27 other members of the Company's
senior management, and (ii) GRSH. The Management Investors own 3.5% of the
common stock (or approximately 6.7% on a fully diluted basis) and GRSH
indirectly owns 96.5% of the common stock (or approximately 91.2% on a fully
diluted basis). The Company's employees and outside directors own approximately
2.1% of the common stock on a fully diluted basis. GRSH, in turn, is 85%
beneficially owned by Nomura International plc, a wholly owned subsidiary of
The Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. ("Nomura"), and 9.5% beneficially owned by
Babcock & Brown Holdings Inc., a San Francisco based leasing, asset and project
financing advisory company, in each case, through instruments convertible into
GRSH's capital stock. The principal activities of Nomura, which was founded in
1925 in Osaka, Japan and is currently Japan's largest securities brokerage
house, include securities brokerage, trading, and investment banking in global
financial markets.

<PAGE>

shares and stock options was approximately $2.2 billion (the "Merger
Consideration"). On October 15, 1996 the Company securitized $3.1 billion of
lease and loan receivables (including $.3 billion of receivables previously sold
and repurchased by the Company) (the "Securitization"). A portion of the
Securitization proceeds was used to repay a loan from Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners L.P. in the amount of approximately $1.3 billion (the "Interim Loan").
Such loan was used to fund a part of the Merger Consideration. On October 25,
1996 the Company, through a consolidated subsidiary, issued (the "Preferred
Offering") to the public eight million Trust Originated Preferred Securities
("Preferred Securities"). For a more detailed discussion of the Merger, the
Securitization, the Preferred Offering and their related impacts on the Company,
see Notes 1,6 and 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

1996 versus 1995

Unless otherwise indicated, all period to period comparisons represent
balances or activity at or for the year ended December 31, 1996 versus 1995,
respectively.

Net income of $168.5 million increased 32.1% from $127.6 million. This
increase was generated principally through increased securitization and loan
sales revenue, net portfolio revenues resulting from a higher level of average
net portfolio assets and increased computer trading sales. Somewhat impeding the
earnings growth was increased operating and administrative ("O&A") expenses
caused primarily by one-time Merger related costs. A higher provision for credit
losses also somewhat offset the increased revenues. The Company expects 1997 net
income to be lower than 1996 primarily due to an anticipated decreased level of
securitization revenue. In addition, the decreased earning asset base associated
with the 1996 securitizations will result in future lower portfolio revenues,
offset in part by increased servicing revenues.

Finance revenue of $204.2 million increased 17.0% from $174.5 million. The
20.7% increase in average net finance receivables to $2.0 billion generated
approximately $36.2 million of additional revenue and was driven by increases in
the large-ticket structured and specialty finance and certain small-ticket
portfolios offset by $.1 billion of finance receivables securitized. A decline
in the overall average yield from 10.68% to 10.35% reduced revenue by $6.5
million. The decrease in yield is consistent with the relative proportion of
floating rate loans in the portfolio and the slightly lower average cost of debt
(see interest expense discussion below).

Capital lease revenue of $598.2 million increased 2.1% from $586.1 million.
The improved average yield of 10.50% from 10.29% contributed $11.6 million of
the increase while the .09% increase in the average net capital lease portfolio
to $5.7 billion contributed the remaining $.5 million. The improved yield was
primarily due to increased levels of higher yielding assets in certain
small-ticket, automotive and mid-range and mainframe computer portfolios.
However, certain non-U.S. businesses experienced decreased yields in 1996. The
growth in the average net capital lease portfolio, which was experienced
primarily in the small-ticket

<PAGE>

leasing portfolios and international businesses, was almost entirely offset by
the securitization of approximately $3.3 billion of capital lease receivables.
As a result, the Company's capital lease portfolio will be lower and generate
less capital lease revenue, however, the Company will experience an increase in
servicing fees for managing such securitized assets.

Revenue on operating leases of $697.0 million increased 24.3% and
depreciation expense on operating leases of $455.6 million increased 28.5%.
Rental revenue less associated depreciation ("operating lease margin") was
$241.4 million, or 34.6% of rental revenue compared with $206.5 million, or
36.8% of rental revenue. The increased rental revenue was primarily generated by
growth in the Company's small-ticket leasing, automotive and computer related
portfolios and international businesses. The decreased operating lease margin
percent relates primarily to increased depreciation on certain computer-related
assets and certain small-ticket portfolios.

Net interest margin (finance revenue, capital lease revenue and rental
revenue on operating leases, less depreciation on operating leases and interest
expense) of $585.8 million or 6.57% of average net portfolio assets decreased
slightly from 6.69%. The decrease in the net interest margin percentage was due
to the large amount of higher yielding assets securitized and the increase in
the debt to equity plus Company-obligated preferred securities of subsidiary
(hereafter, "debt to equity plus preferred securities") ratio partially offset
by a decrease in the average cost of debt and an increased yield of the
Company's total net portfolio assets. The debt to equity plus preferred
securities ratio increased to 7.13 from 6.22 primarily as a result of the
Company's recapitalization associated with the Merger (see discussion of
interest expense below). In addition, the increase of 15.3% in average debt
exceeded the increase of 7.2% in average portfolio assets. The decrease in the
cost of debt to 6.38% from 6.60% resulted from the issuance of medium and
long-term debt at a lower cost than the maturing debt and a shift in the mix
toward commercial paper during the second half of the year due to the
recapitalization of the Company. During 1996, the Company issued approximately
$2.0 billion of medium and long-term debt at an average rate of 5.93%, and
repaid $2.1 billion of medium and long-term with an average rate of 6.91%. The
total portfolio yield increased to 11.72% from 11.64% primarily due to increased
higher yielding capital leases in certain small ticket, automotive and mid-range
and mainframe computer portfolios. As interest rates change, product pricing is
generally adjusted to reflect the Company's higher or lower cost of borrowings.
However, the pricing in connection with certain small-ticket leasing portfolios
tends to lag and may not be commensurate with the change in the Company's
borrowing costs. As a result of securitizing higher yielding assets in 1996 and
the increased ratio of debt to equity plus preferred securities, the Company
expects the net interest margin to decrease in 1997, relative to 1996.

<PAGE>

Revenue from securitizations and loan sales, including Small Business
Administration ("SBA") loans, of $164.9 million increased $148.5 million from
$16.4 million. This increase was due primarily to the Company's October 15, 1996
securitization of $3.1 billion of lease and loan receivables as well as other
securitizations aggregating $.3 billion of lease and loan receivables. This
compares to a $75 million securitization in 1995 (see Note 6 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). The Company anticipates that going forward, it will
securitize approximately one-third of its forecasted volume each year as part of
its funding strategy. As a result, the level of securitizations and therefore,
the related revenues are expected to be lower than experienced in 1996.

Under the terms of this and previous years' securitizations, the Company is
liable to the purchasers of such receivables for a limited amount of recourse
granted by the Company to such purchasers. In the unlikely event that all such
receivables became uncollectible, the Company's maximum exposure under limited
recourse provisions granted to the purchasers of all securitized lease
receivables would have been $104.9 million and $254.8 million at December 31,
1996 and 1995, respectively. In addition, the Company is compensated for
providing such purchasers with billing, collection and other services with
respect to such securitized receivables.

Revenue from sales of equipment of $90.6 million increased from $48.7
million. Similarly, cost of equipment sales of $78.5 million increased from
$43.4 million. Equipment sales revenue less associated cost of equipment sales
("equipment sales margin") of $12.1 million, or 13.3% of revenue from sales of
equipment increased from $5.4 million, or 11.0%. The revenue and margin
improvements were primarily due to a heightened demand for mainframes and
emerging technology equipment.

Other revenue of $197.2 million increased 3.6% from $190.3 million. Other
revenue consists mainly of sales of leased and off-leased equipment, portfolio
servicing fees and other fee related revenue (see Note 7 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). While gains on sale of leased and off-leased equipment
remained flat, the increase in other revenue was driven by fee related revenue
and other portfolio related revenue. As a result of the increased level of
securitizations and the Company's strategy of securitizing approximately
one-third of its forecasted annual volume each year, the Company expects to
experience an increase in the service fee revenue associated with the increase
in managed assets.

At December 31, 1996, total assets managed by the Company on behalf of
others were $4.8 billion compared with $2.2 billion at December 31, 1995. The
increase in the level of assets managed is attributable to the significant
increase in securitizations and loan sales offset in part by normal run-off. The
total assets managed on behalf of AT&T, Lucent Technologies Inc. ("Lucent") and
NCR Corporation ("NCR") (herein collectively, "AT&T/Lucent/NCR" or the "Former
Affiliates") represented 31.1% and 68.0% of the total assets managed at December
31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.

<PAGE>

The following table shows the respective percentages of the assets,
revenues and net income (loss) attributable to (i) leasing and financing
services provided by the Company to customers of AT&T/Lucent/NCR, (ii)
transactions involving AT&T/Lucent/NCR as end-user and (iii) the Company's
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR business, in each case at or for the years ended December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994. The net income (loss) shown below were calculated
based upon what the Company believes to be a reasonable allocation of
interest, income taxes and certain corporate overhead expenses.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At or for the year ended
December 31, 1996

Assets Revenues Net Income (Loss)
-------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994
% % % % % % % % %
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Customers
of AT&T/
Lucent/NCR 23.0 29.5 34.6 30.4 32.7 33.4 62.6 67.9 82.5
AT&T/Lucent/
NCR as
End-User 4.7 5.3 6.8 6.7 8.3 9.5 5.2 8.2 8.5
Non-AT&T/
Lucent/NCR
Business 72.3 65.2 58.6 62.9 59.0 57.1 32.2 23.9 9.0
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

The Company intends to continue its strategy of expanding its
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses, while at the same time enhancing its
relationship with AT&T/Lucent/NCR. Because the growth in revenues generated by
the Company's non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses can be expected to lag behind the
incurrence of expenses necessary to expand and operate such businesses, the
Company anticipates that the percentage of its total net income and revenues
attributable to non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses may vary from year to year
depending upon the stage of development of these non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses.

The securitization of certain non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR portfolio assets
positively affected net income of the non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses in all
years presented. Although the Company substantially increased the amount of
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR assets securitized in 1996, the Company also securitized a
portion of the AT&T/Lucent/NCR related assets (see Note 6 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). The Company currently anticipates that approximately
one-third of its annual forecasted financing volume originated each year will be
securitized as part of the Company's ongoing financing strategy. As a result,
the assets, revenues and net income of the non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses will
vary depending upon the mix of assets securitized. The Company decreased the
amount of assets securitized in 1995 compared to 1994.

The 1996 increase in non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR business assets (as a percentage
of total Company) was generated across most of the Company's businesses with
partially offsetting declines in certain small-ticket portfolios (as a result of
increased securitizations in 1996) and automobile portfolios. The 1996 increase
in non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR business revenues (as a percentage of total Company) was
generated across all Company businesses. AT&T Capital's total
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses

<PAGE>

contributed 32.2% of net income in 1996, up 8.3% from 1995. Had the previously
discussed Merger and Securitization not occurred, the Company estimates that the
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses would have contributed approximately 34% of net
income. This estimate assumes the exclusion of the Securitization gain and
one-time merger related costs, add back of revenues associated with assets sold,
and adjustment to interest expense for certain other significant Merger and
Securitization related events.

Interest expense of $458.0 million increased 11.4%, or $47.0 million.
Average borrowings outstanding of $7.2 billion increased 15.3%, or $.9 billion
primarily due to growth in the average portfolio assets and an increased debt to
equity plus preferred securities ratio. Higher average borrowings contributed
$52.3 million of the increase and was partially offset by $5.3 million due to a
decline in the average cost of debt. In October 1996, the Company repaid
approximately $1.6 billion of commercial paper with proceeds from the
Securitization and Preferred Offering, net of amounts used to purchase the
Company's common stock. Consequently, the lower overall borrowings outstanding
should reduce the Company's interest expense. However, the Company's cost of
debt in the future will be negatively impacted by the loss of interest free
loans from AT&T pursuant to a Gross Profit Tax Deferral ("GPTD") Interest Free
Loan Agreement (the "GPTD Agreement"). In addition, as discussed below in
"Liquidity and Capital Resources", the Company's debt ratings were lowered in
connection with the Merger. As a result, the Company estimates its cost of
issuing debt will increase, all other factors remaining equal (see Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements).

On October 25, 1996 the Company, through a subsidiary, issued to the public
eight million Company-obligated preferred securities for $25 per share. Holders
of the securities are entitled to receive cash distributions at an annual rate
of 9.06%, which is guaranteed by the Company. During 1996, $3.3 million of
distributions were paid to the Preferred Securities holders. (See Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.)

O&A expenses of $564.5 million increased 19.2% from $473.7 million. This
increase was due primarily to $52.4 million of one-time merger related costs
which include the accelerated payout and additional amounts due under the
Company's Share Performance Incentive Plan, payments made to certain officers of
the Company to waive certain of their rights under the Company's Leadership
Severance Plan, certain other termination and other payments and merger-related
transaction costs. In addition, O&A was impacted by the increased costs
associated with managing a higher level of owned and managed assets. O&A as a
percentage of total period-end owned and managed assets of 4.38% increased from
4.03%. However, the percentage was 3.97% excluding the above mentioned one-time
merger related costs. If the Company continues to improve this ratio through
increased utilization of infrastructure and increased operating efficiencies,
primarily relating to businesses acquired and start-up activities, and other
investments in operational improvements, the Company expects that O&A to total
period-end owned and managed assets will be approximately 3.5% in a couple of
years.

<PAGE>

The provision for credit losses of $113.6 million increased 31.8% from
$86.2 million. See "Credit Quality" below for a discussion of the provision for
credit losses.

The Company's effective income tax rate of 39.5% increased from 38.7%. The
increase in the overall effective tax rate was due primarily to certain one-time
merger related costs which were not deductible for tax purposes.

1995 versus 1994

Net income for the year ended December 31, 1995, was $127.6 million,
an increase of $27.2 million, or 27.1%, compared with 1994. The increase was
generated principally through increased portfolio revenues resulting from a
higher level of average net portfolio assets, strong secondary market activity
and a favorable credit environment. Higher interest expense and operating and
administrative expenses, associated with administering a higher level of assets,
partially offset the increased revenues.

Finance revenue of $174.5 million increased $53.7 million, or 44.5%, for
1995 compared with 1994 while the average net finance receivable portfolio
increased $396.2 million, or 32.0%, to $1,633.9 million for 1995. The increased
level of average net finance receivables accounted for $38.7 million of the
finance revenue increase. The increase in average yield to 10.68% in 1995 from
9.76% in 1994 contributed the remaining $15.0 million. The improved yield is
primarily due to the increased level of higher yielding products in the
Company's large-ticket specialty and structured finance portfolios and the
Company's SBA portfolio.

Capital lease revenue of $586.1 million increased $108.3 million, or 22.7%,
for 1995, compared with 1994. This increase was due to a 22.8% increase in the
average net capital lease portfolio to $5,690.1 million. The acquisition of the
vendor leasing and finance companies of Banco Central Hispano and certain of its
affiliates ("CFH Leasing International") was the largest contributor to the
increase in the capital lease portfolio. The overall yield of 10.3% was
unchanged from the prior year. Although certain of the Company's non-U.S.
businesses achieved improved yields over the prior year, certain small-ticket
leasing portfolios experienced decreased yields in 1995.

Rental revenue on operating leases of $561.0 million increased $85.6
million, or 18.0%, for 1995, compared with 1994. Depreciation on operating
leases of $354.5 million increased $40.9 million, or 13.1% for 1995, compared
with 1994. Operating lease margin was $206.5 million, or 36.8% of rental revenue
for 1995, compared with $161.8 million, or 34.0%, for 1994. The increased
operating lease margin in 1995 relates primarily to a higher level of renewed
leases in the Company's small-ticket telecommunications equipment portfolio,
higher margins in the testing and diagnostic equipment portfolio and the
automobile portfolio, as well as a reduced level of lower yielding mainframe
computer assets.

<PAGE>

Net interest margin of $556.1 million was 6.69% of average net portfolio
assets for the year ended December 31, 1995. This compares with a net interest
margin of $488.7 million, or 7.29%, of average net portfolio assets for the year
ended December 31, 1994. The decrease in net interest margin was due to an
increase in the Company's average cost of debt, partially offset by higher
yields on the Company's net portfolio assets, and an increase in the Company's
debt to equity ratio. For 1995, the average cost of debt was 6.60%, compared to
5.65% in 1994 while the total portfolio yield increased to 11.64% in 1995 from
11.34% in 1994. As interest rates change, product pricing is generally adjusted
to reflect the Company's higher or lower cost of borrowing. However, the pricing
in connection with some small-ticket portfolios tends to lag and may not be
commensurate with the change in the Company's borrowing costs.

Revenue from securitizations and loan sales, including SBA loans, of $16.4
million in 1995 increased $.1 million from 1994. This increase was due to higher
gains on the sale of SBA loans of $9.0 million offset by a decrease of $8.9
million in securitization related gains.

Revenue from sales of equipment of $48.7 million in 1995 decreased
substantially from $126.6 million in 1994. Similarly, cost of equipment sales of
$43.4 million in 1995 decreased from $117.0 million in 1994. The Company is
experiencing lower equipment sales generally due to a shift in customer behavior
away from the purchase of mainframe computers. Equipment sales margin was $5.4
million, or 11.0% of equipment sales revenue for the year ended December 31,
1995. Equipment sales margin for the year ended December 31, 1994, was $9.6
million, or 7.6% of equipment sales revenue. The equipment sales margin for 1995
was favorably impacted by increased trading in the higher margin mid-range
computer area, a relatively new market for the Company.

Other revenue of $190.3 million increased $23.2 million, or 13.9%, in 1995,
compared with 1994. Other revenue consists mainly of sales of leased and
off-lease equipment, portfolio servicing fees and other fee related revenue (see
Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The increase in other revenue
was primarily generated from higher remarketing gains of $10.5 million from
sales of leased and off-lease equipment and increased other fee related revenue
of $5.2 million. These increases were somewhat offset by lower portfolio
servicing fees of $3.6 million due to a lower managed asset base.

In the fourth quarter of 1995 and 1994, respectively, the Company
securitized $74.8 million and $259.1 million of lease receivables resulting in
gains of $5.9 million and $14.8 million. The gain on receivables securitized as
a percent of the assets securitized (the "spread") was 7.8% in 1995 and 5.7% in
1994. The improvement in the securitization spread is due primarily to a lower
discount rate used in the 1995 securitization as a result of a lower interest
rate environment.

<PAGE>

Under the terms of this and previous years' securitizations, the Company is
liable to the purchasers of such receivables for a limited amount of recourse
granted by the Company to such purchasers. In the unlikely event that all such
receivables became uncollectible, the Company's maximum exposure under limited
recourse provisions granted to the purchasers of all securitized lease
receivables would have been $254.8 million and $353.1 million at December 31,
1995 and 1994, respectively. In addition, the Company provides such purchasers
with billing and collection and other services with respect to such securitized
receivables.

At December 31, 1995, total assets managed by the Company on behalf of
others were $2.2 billion compared with $2.7 billion at December 31, 1994. The
decrease in the level of assets managed is attributable to normal run-off
coupled with lower securitization activity. The total assets managed on behalf
of AT&T and its affiliates represented 68.0% and 55.9% of the total assets
managed at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

The 1995 increases in the non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR business assets and revenues
(as a percentage of total Company) were generated almost equally from U.S. and
foreign operations. The significant increase realized from U.S.
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR related net income was primarily generated from the
Company's large-ticket specialty and structured finance activities, SBA loan
sales and growth in the automobile portfolio. Net losses from foreign
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses somewhat offset the strong U.S. results.

Growth in the Company's portfolio assets primarily caused the average
borrowings outstanding to increase by 29.5%, or $1.4 billion, to $6.2 billion,
while the Company's interest expense increased 51.2%, or $139.2 million, to
$411.0 million for 1995, compared with the prior year. The Company's 1995 debt
to equity ratio increased to 6.22 from 5.51. The increase in average borrowings
caused interest expense to increase by approximately $80.1 million. A higher
average cost of debt in 1995 (versus 1994) increased interest expense by $59.1
million. The Company's average 1995 interest rate on borrowings was 6.60% as
compared to 5.65% in 1994. The increase in the Company's 1995 average cost of
debt is a function of the Company issuing new debt at higher average rates than
the debt that matured during 1995. During 1995, the Company issued approximately
$2.9 billion of medium and long-term debt with an average interest rate of 7.2%.
The Company had $1.8 billion of medium and long-term debt with an average
interest rate of 5.9% mature in 1995. In addition, the Company's average
interest rate on commercial paper increased to 5.3% in 1995, up from 4.3% in
1994.

Operating and administrative expenses of $473.7 million increased $46.5
million, or 10.9%, in 1995, compared with 1994. This increase includes $27.0
million of expenses associated with the start-up of certain non-AT&T businesses,
acquisitions and international expansion. In addition, higher expenses were
incurred associated with managing a higher level of portfolio assets. For 1995,
operating and administrative expenses to total year-end assets decreased to
4.96% compared with 5.33% for 1994. This decrease can be attributed to some of
the Company's businesses (including recent start-up businesses) more fully
utilizing their infrastructure, increased operating efficiencies and increases
in assets financed.

<PAGE>

The effective income tax rate was 38.7% and 42.2% for 1995 and 1994,
respectively. The decline in the effective tax rate for 1995, compared with
1994, resulted from several factors including a lower level of non-tax
deductible goodwill and various other decreases.

See "Credit Quality" below for a discussion of the provision for credit
losses.

CREDIT QUALITY

The active management of credit losses is an important element of the
Company's business. The Company seeks to minimize its credit risk through
diversification of its portfolio assets by customer, industry segment,
geographic location and maturity. The Company's financing activities have been
spread across a wide range of equipment types (e.g., telecommunications, general
equipment (consists of general office, manufacturing and medical equipment),
information technology and transportation) and real estate and a large number of
customers located throughout the United States and, to a lesser extent, abroad.

The following table reflects the Company's portfolio credit performance
indicators. Portfolio Assets include the investment in finance receivables,
capital leases and operating leases.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ending December 31 1996 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for credit losses $169.0 $223.2 $176.4
Non-accrual assets $135.1 $118.5 $120.5
Net charge-offs/Portfolio assets 1.17% 0.50% 0.73%
Allowance for credit losses/Portfolio assets 2.30% 2.39% 2.30%
Non-accrual assets/Portfolio assets 1.84% 1.27% 1.57%
Delinquency (two months or greater) 2.56% 1.46% 1.49%
</TABLE>

The decrease in the allowance for credit losses as well as the increase in
the net charge-offs/portfolio assets, non-accrual assets/portfolio assets and
delinquency resulted primarily from the significant increase in securitizations
in 1996. Such securitizations include generally better performing assets, those
transactions that are not more than 60 days past due. Therefore, the owned
portfolio reflects a higher proportion of delinquent receivables which also
tends to drive a higher net charge-offs/portfolio assets ratio. Furthermore, the
securitizations generally comprise receivables from the Company's small-ticket
lease portfolios which carry a higher allowance for credit losses/portfolio
asset ratio compared to the overall ratio. As a result, the Company's overall
allowance for credit losses/portfolio assets ratio decreases when such
small-ticket receivables are sold. The decrease in the allowance for credit
losses was due primarily to the reclassification of certain amounts to
securitization recourse reserves. Net charge-offs/portfolios assets was also
impacted by the write-off of a large financing of approximately $11 million. In
addition, the increases in the dollar amount of delinquencies and non-accrual
assets resulted from a $36.5 million loan placed on non-accrual status. In
addition, in February and March 1997, the Company placed on non-accrual status
two accounts totalling $31.0 million.

<PAGE>

The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses at a level management
believes is adequate to cover estimated losses in the portfolio based on a
review of historical loss experience, a detailed analysis of delinquencies and
problem portfolio assets, and an assessment of probable losses in the portfolio
as a whole given its diversification. Management also takes into consideration
the potential impact of existing and anticipated economic conditions.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Unless otherwise indicated, all period to period comparisons represent
balances at December 31, 1996 verses 1995.

Net portfolio assets (net investment in finance receivables, capital leases
and operating leases), decreased $1.9 billion. This decrease was principally due
to the significant increase in the securitization of capital lease receivables
and finance receivables as well as the associated reclassification of residual
values and certain reserves to other assets and deferred charges in 1996 offset
in part by growth in each of the net portfolio asset categories.

Primarily as a result of the above mentioned increased level of
securitizations, the vast majority of which were U.S. assets, the Company's
international assets (excluding cross border transactions) grew to 24.0% of
total assets, up from 17.5%.

The net investment in finance receivables increased by $.3 billion, or
18.6% to $2.1 billion. This increase was primarily due to increases in the
large-ticket specialty and structured finance, certain small-ticket,
international consumer loan and SBA loan portfolios offset in part by $.1
billion of finance receivables securitized.

The net investment in capital leases decreased by $2.5 billion, or 41.0%,
to $3.6 billion. This decrease was primarily due to the increased level of
capital lease receivables of $3.3 billion securitized in 1996 and the
reclassification of the associated residual values of approximately $.3 billion
and certain reserves of $.1 billion to deferred charges and other assets. This
net decrease was partially offset by growth primarily in certain small-ticket
leasing portfolios.

The net investment in operating leases increased by $.3 billion, or 25.6%,
to $1.4 billion. The increase was primarily due to growth in the Company's
computer related portfolios, international businesses and certain small-ticket
portfolios.

<PAGE>

Deferred charges and other assets increased by $.4 billion, or 82.7%, to
$.8 billion. This increase was due primarily to the above mentioned
reclassification from net investment in capital leases of the retained residual
values and certain reserves and the $.1 billion retained interests associated
with the assets securitized in 1996.

The Company regularly monitors its estimates of residual values associated
with its owned and securitized portfolios and believes that its residual values
are conservatively stated.

The Company had a net deferred tax asset position in 1996 of $.1 billion
which compares to a net deferred tax liability position of $.6 billion in 1995.
The primary drivers of this change were the elimination of substantially all
deferred tax liabilities due to a Section 338(h)(10) election under the Internal
Revenue Code, as amended, similar elections in certain state and local
jurisdictions and the establishment of an approximately $.2 billion deferred tax
asset associated with the step-up in basis to fair value for tax purposes, which
was not done for book purposes ("push-down accounting") due to the Company's
significant level of public debt outstanding. This was offset in part by
additional deferred tax liabilities of approximately $.1 billion (see Note 12 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Total debt decreased by $.5 billion, or 6.7%, to $6.5 billion. This
decrease was due primarily to the repayment of approximately $1.6 billion of
short-term debt with proceeds from the Securitization and Preferred Offering,
net of amounts used to purchase the Company's common stock and growth in the net
portfolio assets.

On October 25, 1996 the Company, through a subsidiary, issued to the public
eight million Company-obligated preferred securities for $25 per share. Holders
of the securities are entitled to receive cash distributions at an annual rate
of 9.06%, which is guaranteed by the Company. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.)

Total shareowners' equity decreased by $.4 billion, or 36.6%, to $.7
billion primarily as a result of the Company's recapitalization associated with
the Merger (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company generates a substantial portion of its funds to support the
Company's operations from lease and rental receipts, but is also highly
dependent upon external financing, including the issuance of commercial paper
and medium and long-term debt in public markets, foreign bank lines of credit
and, historically to a lesser extent, privately placed asset-backed financings
(or securitizations). However, the Company anticipates that, as a key part of
the Company's on-going financing strategy to manage leverage, approximately
one-third of its annual financing volume originated each year will be
securitized through public and/or private securitizations.

<PAGE>

The 1996 securitizations and anticipated ongoing securitizations of
approximately one-third of forecasted annual volumes will have significant
impacts on the Company's financial position and results of operations depending
upon their timing and magnitude. These impacts, some of which are described in
the Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections, include, but are not
limited to, the following: net investment in finance receivables and capital
leases (including residual values, allowance for credit losses and initial
direct costs) will decrease; lower asset levels will result in lower finance
revenue and capital lease revenue; cash proceeds generated from the sale will
generally be used to reduce debt; lower debt levels will reduce interest expense
and leverage; securitization gains will typically be generated as the assets are
sold; fees will be earned for servicing the portfolios; residual values will be
frozen at the present value at the time of securitization and reclassified to
other assets and deferred charges; capital lease revenue will no longer be
recognized on the residuals; with lower carrying values of frozen residuals,
income (losses) generated from renewals and sales of assets at end of lease will
be higher (lower) than if the assets were not securitized; yields and margins on
owned assets are likely to be lower due to the fact the securitizations will
typically include small-ticket products which generally have higher yields and
margins; portfolio quality measures such as delinquency, non-accrual assets, and
net charge-offs/portfolio assets will likely increase due to the sale of
generally better performing assets (these same measures on an owned and
securitized basis would generally not be affected by the securitizations); and
finally, assets, revenues and income derived from the non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR
businesses as well as foreign businesses will change depending upon the mix of
assets securitized.

In connection with the Merger, the Company's four rating agencies took the
following actions: Standard & Poor's lowered the Company's senior medium and
long-term debt and commercial paper, previously rated A and A-1, to BBB and A-2,
respectively; Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co. lowered the Company's senior
medium and long-term debt and commercial paper, previously rated A and D-1, to
BBB and D-2, respectively; Fitch Investor Services, which began rating the
Company's commercial paper in May, 1996 lowered the Company's F-1 rating to F-2
and rated the Company's senior medium and long-term debt BBB. Moody's Investors
Service has lowered the Company's senior medium and long-term debt and
commercial paper to Baa3 from A3 and P-3 from P-1, respectively. See "Results of
Operations" for discussion of the impact on interest expense.

In 1996, the Company issued short-term notes (principally commercial paper)
of $64.7 billion and made repayments of $65.0 billion, and issued medium and
long-term debt of $2.0 billion and repaid medium and long-term debt of $2.1
billion. In 1995, the Company issued short-term notes of $28.0 billion, issued
medium and long-term notes of $2.9 billion and made short-term note repayments
of $28.2 billion and repaid medium and long-term debt of $1.8 billion.

During 1996 and 1995, principal collections from customers and proceeds
from securitized receivables and SBA loan sales of approximately $7.4 billion
and $4.1 billion, respectively, were received. These receipts were primarily
used for financing portfolio assets (including purchases of finance asset
portfolios and businesses) of approximately $7.5 billion in 1996, and $5.8
billion in 1995, which includes the repayment of the related Interim Loan in
1996.

<PAGE>

On February 29, 1996, shareowners of record as of February 9, 1996, were
paid a fourth quarter 1995 dividend of $.11 per share. During 1996, the
Company's Board of Directors declared dividends each of $.11 per share to
shareowners of record as of May 10, 1996 and August 9, 1996 payable on May 31,
1996 and August 30, 1996, respectively. As a result of the Merger, the Company
anticipates that it will no longer pay dividends in the short-term.

In conjunction with acquisitions, in 1996 and 1995 the Company assumed $3.4
million and $473.0 million of debt, respectively, of which $60.1 million was
outstanding at December 31, 1996.

During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") a debt registration statement in the amount
of $4.0 billion. The SEC declared this registration statement effective on
January 3, 1997. As of February 28, 1997, the Company had issued $1.2 billion of
debt under this registration statement.

In September 1996, the Company renegotiated its back-up credit facility of
$1.8 billion. This facility, negotiated with a consortium of 24 lending
institutions, supports the commercial paper issued by the Company. At December
31, 1996 this facility was unused. Under the most restrictive provision of the
Company's back-up facility, the Company is required to maintain a minimum
consolidated tangible net worth (based on a formula that includes a portion of
current net income) of $546.9 million at December 31, 1996. The Company is in
compliance with this and all other covenants of the agreement. To meet local
funding requirements, the Company's foreign operations have available lines of
credit of approximately $362.9 million, of which approximately $26.2 million was
available at December 31, 1996. These facilities are generally renewed annually.

Prior to the Merger, the Company has, from time to time, borrowed funds on
an interest-free basis directly from AT&T pursuant to a Gross Profit Tax
Deferred Interest Free Loan Agreement. As a result of the Merger, the Company is
no longer a member of AT&T's consolidated group for federal income tax purposes
and was required to repay to AT&T $247.4 million of interest free loans.

Future financing is contemplated to be arranged as necessary to meet the
Company's capital and other requirements with the timing of issue, principal
amount and form depending on the Company's needs and prevailing market and
general economic conditions.

The Company considers its current financial resources, together with the
debt facilities referred to above and estimated future cash flows, to be
adequate to fund the Company's future growth and operating requirements.

<PAGE>

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

AT&T Capital's asset and liability management process takes a co ordinated
approach to the management of interest rate and foreign currency risks. The
Company's overall strategy is to match the duration and average cash flows of
its borrowings with the duration and average cash flows of its portfolio assets,
as well as the currency denominations of its borrowings with those of its
portfolio assets, in a manner intended to reduce the Company's interest rate
and foreign currency exposure. The following discussion describes certain key
elements of this process, including AT&T Capital's use of derivatives to
manage risk.

Match Funding

The Company generally matches the duration and maturity structure of its
liabilities to that of its portfolio assets. The Company routinely projects the
expected future cash flows related to its current portfolio assets. Based on
these projections, the Company is able to match the maturity and duration of its
debt with that of its assets. The cash flow projections incorporate assumptions
about customer behavior such as prepayments, refinancings and charge-offs. The
assumptions are based on historical experience with the Company's individual
markets and customers and are continually monitored and updated as markets and
customer behaviors change, to reflect current customer preferences, competitive
market conditions, portfolio growth rates and portfolio mix.

Interest Rate Risk and Currency Exchange Risk

The Company actively manages interest rate risk to protect the Company's
margins on existing transactions. Interest rate risk is the risk of earnings
volatility attributable to changes in interest rates. The Company routinely
analyzes its portfolio assets and strives to match floating rate assets with
floating rate debt and fixed rate assets with fixed rate debt. The Company
generally achieves a matched position through issuances of commercial paper and
medium and long-term debt, as well as through the use of interest rate swaps.
The Company does not speculate on interest rates, but rather seeks to mitigate
the possible impact of interest rate fluctuations encountered in the normal
course of business. This is a continual process due to prepayments,
refinancings, nonaccrual leases and loans, as well as other portfolio dynamics,
and therefore, interest rate risk can be significantly limited but never fully
eliminated. Additionally, the Company enters into foreign exchange contracts and
participates in the currency swap market to mitigate its exposure to assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and to meet local funding
requirements.

The Company has and expects to continue to enter into foreign exchange
contracts and currency swaps in 1997 as a result of its international
operations.

<PAGE>

Using Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate and Currency Risk

AT&T Capital uses derivatives to match fund its portfolio and thereby
manage interest rate and currency risk. Derivatives can be customized in terms
of duration and interest rate basis (i.e., fixed or floating). Derivatives used
by the Company are operationally efficient to arrange and maintain. Whether AT&T
Capital issues medium and long-term debt, on which it pays a fixed rate, or
issues floating rate debt and utilizes interest rate swaps, on which it
generally pays a fixed rate and receives a floating rate, the Company's interest
rate risk position can be equally well managed. However, it is the interplay
between liquidity, capital, portfolio characteristics, and economic and market
conditions which will determine the final mix of medium and long-term debt,
commercial paper and swaps (or other derivatives) used to manage interest rate
risk. Notes 8 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provide more
details regarding the Company's debt portfolio and interest rate, currency swap
and foreign exchange contract positions.

As of December 31, 1996 the total notional amount of the Company's interest
rate and currency swaps was $1.4 billion and $.3 billion, respectively, as
compared to $2.2 billion and $.3 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 1995.
The U.S. dollar equivalent of the Company's foreign currency forward exchange
contracts was $907.3 million and $658.8 million at the end of 1996 and 1995,
respectively.

Derivative Credit Risk

The notional amount of derivative contracts does not represent direct
credit exposure. Rather, credit exposure may be defined as the market value of
the derivative contract and the ability of the counterparty to perform its
payment obligation under the agreement. The majority of the Company's interest
rate swaps require AT&T Capital to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate.
Therefore, this risk is reduced in a declining interest rate environment as the
Company is generally in a payable position, and is increased in a rising
interest rate environment as the Company is generally in a receivable position.
The Company seeks to control the credit risk of its interest rate swap
agreements through credit approvals, exposure limits and monitoring procedures.
All swap agreements are with major money center banks and intermediaries rated
investment grade by national rating agencies, with the majority of the Company's
counterparties being rated "AA" or better.

There were no past due amounts or reserves for credit losses at December
31, 1996, related to derivative transactions. The Company has never experienced
a credit related charge-off associated with derivative transactions. Debt to
Equity plus Preferred Securities

The Company's ratio of total debt to equity plus preferred securities at
December 31, 1996 was 7.13 compared to 6.22 at December 31, 1995. This increase
is primarily due to the recapitalization of the Company in connection with the
Merger.

<PAGE>

RISK FACTORS

Readers should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to
the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. To the extent
any of the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitutes
a "forward looking statement" for purposes of Section 21E(i) of the Exchange Act
or Section 27A(i) of the Securities Act, the risk factors set forth below are
meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward
looking statements, and no assurance can be given that actual results will not
in fact differ materially.

Expected Reductions In Net Income, Certain Revenues, etc.

The Company expects 1997 net income to be lower than 1996 net income
primarily due to an anticipated decreased level of securitization revenue. In
addition, the Company expects its 1997 portfolio revenues, securitization
revenue and net interest margin to be lower than those of 1996. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Results of Operations--1996 versus 1995."

Risks Related to Plans Involving the Company

Sensitivity to Ratings on Debt. As a result of the consummation of the
Merger, each of the four statistical rating organizations that have been rating
the Company's securities downgraded their respective ratings on the Company's
short-term and (where applicable) long-term senior unsecured debt. Such
downgradings have increased the Company's costs of borrowing all other things
being equal. See "Risk Factors - Certain Increased Costs and Expenses -
Borrowing Costs" below. No assurance can be given that any or all of such rating
organizations will not at any future time or from time to time establish
different ratings on the Company's senior unsecured short-term or long-term
debt. To the extent that any of such rating organizations assigns a lower rating
than the existing ratings, such downgrading would drive even greater interest
expense for the Company, limit its access to its traditional funding sources and
reduce its competitiveness, particularly if any such assigned rating is in a
generic rating category that signifies that the relevant debt of the Company is
less than investment grade. In addition, certain ratings downgradings could
result in the termination of one or more of the License Agreements with AT&T,
Lucent and NCR. See "Risk Factors - Changes in Relationship with AT&T/Lucent/NCR
Entities - Operating and Certain Other Agreements with AT&T Entities" below. Any
such downgrading could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Leverage and Debt Service. As a result of the Company's recapitalization
associated with the Merger, there has been a significant increase in the
Company's ratio of debt to equity plus Preferred Securities. As of December 31,
1996, the Company's ratio of debt to equity plus Preferred Securities was 7.13.
The increased debt to equity plus Preferred Securities ratio has been a factor
in the analyses of the Company by statistical rating organizations.

<PAGE>

Securitization Program. The Company's current business plan incorporates
future securitization transactions as a key part of the Company's financing,
primarily to manage the Company's leverage ratio. The Company will continue to
manage the securitized assets following their sale. To the extent that the
actual level of securitization deviates significantly from the Company's current
target level of securitization (approximately one-third of the financing volume
forecasted to be originated in each year), there could be a material adverse
effect on the Company's results from operations and the ratings assigned to the
short-term or long-term debt of the Company.

Continuity of Management. There is no assurance that any of the Company's
existing officers and key employees will remain in their current positions for
any period of time following the date hereof.

Changes in Relationship with AT&T/Lucent/NCR Entities

Revenues and Net Income Attributable to the AT&T/Lucent/NCR Entities. A
substantial portion of the Company's revenues and net income are attributable
to the financing provided by the Company to customers of AT&T/Lucent/NCR with
respect to products manufactured or distributed by them ("AT&T/Lucent/NCR
Products") and, to a lesser extent, to AT&T/Lucent/NCR as end-user, primarily
with respect to the lease of information technology and other equipment or
vehicles to them as end-users and the administration and management of certain
leased assets on behalf of AT&T/Lucent/NCR. The Company's commercial
relationships with AT&T/Lucent/NCR are currently governed by certain important
agreements.

For the year ended December 31, 1996, approximately 30.4% and 62.6% of the
Company's total revenues and net income, respectively, were attributable to
lease and other financings provided by the Company to the customers of
AT&T/Lucent/NCR with respect to AT&T/Lucent/NCR Products. An additional
approximately 6.7% and 5.2% of total revenues and net income, respectively, for
the year ended December 31, 1996, were attributable to transactions with
AT&T/Lucent/NCR as end-users. The Company's Non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR Businesses
generated approximately 62.9% and 32.2% of total revenues and net income,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1996. Had the previously discussed
Merger and Securitization not occurred, the Company estimates that the
non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR businesses would have contributed approximately 34% of net
income. This estimate assumes the exclusion of the Securitization gain and
one-time merger related costs, add back of revenues associated with assets sold,
and adjustment to interest expense for certain other significant Merger and
Securitization related events.

<PAGE>

Accordingly, while the proportion of the Company's total revenues and net
income from Non-AT&T/Lucent/NCR Businesses has grown over the last several
years, a substantial portion of the Company's total revenues and net income have
been generated by the Company's relationship with AT&T/Lucent/NCR. A
significant decrease in the portion of the sales of the AT&T/Lucent/NCR
Products that are financed by the Company, or in the absolute amount of the
AT&T/Lucent/NCR product sales (in either case, particularly with respect to
Lucent), or in the amount of transactions effected by the Company with
the AT&T/Lucent/NCR as end-user (particularly with respect to AT&T) would have
a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and financial
condition.

Operating and Certain Other Agreement With AT&T/Lucent/NCR. The initial
terms of each of the Operating Agreements (pursuant to which, among other
things, the Company serves as preferred provider of financing services and has
certain related and other rights and privileges in connection with the financing
of equipment to the customers of AT&T/Lucent/NCR) will expire on August 4, 2000,
but will be automatically renewed for successive two-year periods unless either
party thereto gives the other a non-renewal notice at least one year prior to
the end of the initial or renewal term. None of AT&T/Lucent/NCR is required to
renew the term of its Operating Agreement beyond the expiration of the current
term on August 4, 2000.

Although the Company intends to seek to maintain and improve its existing
relationships with Lucent, NCR and AT&T and expects to seek to extend each of
the Operating Agreements beyond August 4, 2000, no assurance can be given that
the Operating Agreements, or any of them, will be extended beyond such date or,
if extended, that the terms and conditions thereof will not be modified in a
manner adverse to the Company. Failure to renew the Operating Agreements,
especially Lucent's Operating Agreement, on terms not adverse to the Company
could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Moreover, in certain
circumstances the Operating Agreements may be terminated prior to their
expiration.

To provide additional incentive for Lucent to assist the Company in the
financing of products manufactured or distributed by Lucent, in recent years the
Company has paid Lucent a sales assistance fee ("SAF") equal to a designated
percentage of the aggregate sales prices and other charges ("volumes") of Lucent
products financed by the Company. In early 1996, following Lucent's request, the
Company agreed to pay a substantial increase in the Lucent SAF for 1995, both as
an absolute amount and as a percentage of volumes attributable to Lucent. After
giving effect to the increase, the SAF paid by the Company to Lucent for 1995
was approximately double the 1994 fee. The Company and Lucent recently agreed to
a modified formula for calculating the SAF for the remaining years of the term
of Lucent's Operating Agreement (retroactive to 1996). The revised formula is
expected to result in aggregate annual SAF which are approximately double the
amounts that would have been paid if the pre-1995 formula had been maintained.
No assurance can be given that Lucent will not seek a higher SAF in 1997 or
future years (or otherwise attempt to share in the revenues

<PAGE>

of the Company associated with the leasing of Lucent products) or seek to use
alternative providers of financing. Similarly, although NCR has not requested
any SAF or other similar benefits from the Company by reason of the financing by
the Company of its products, no assurance can be given that they will not do so
in the future. Any such action by Lucent, alone or in combination with similar
action by NCR, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Operating Agreements do not require that the Company be the sole
provider of financing in connection with the AT&T/Lucent/NCR product sales.
Also, such Operating Agreements provide no assurance that the percentage of such
sales for which the Company provides financing will not decrease in the future.
Subject to certain significant restrictions, the Operating Agreements permit
AT&T/Lucent/NCR to use or promote an alternative financing program offered by an
unaffiliated company that provides better terms than those offered by the
Company, without providing the Company an opportunity to match such better
terms. In addition, none of the Operating Agreements is generally required to be
assumed by the purchaser or other transferee of all or any portion of the
relevant AT&T/Lucent/NCR's product manufacturing business upon any sale or other
disposition thereof by such AT&T/Lucent/NCR entity, although such
AT&T/Lucent/NCR entity is required to use reasonable efforts to cause the
related Operating Agreement to be so assumed. Moreover, each Operating Agreement
provides that AT&T/Lucent/NCR may terminate the Company's "preferred provider"
status and organize their own "captive" finance subsidiaries if the Company's
Financing Penetration Rate (as described in the respective Operating Agreements)
decreases by certain specified amounts or after the Company becomes a subsidiary
of a person other than AT&T Capital Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
AT&T or one of its affiliates. The Company does not expect its Financing
Penetration Rate under its Operating Agreements with Lucent and NCR to decrease
during the remainder of the initial term thereof by an amount that would permit
Lucent or NCR, as the case may be, to terminate the Company's "preferred
provider" status, although no assurance can be given in that regard.

The Company's ability to capture a significant portion of the
AT&T/Lucent/NCR product sales is augmented by the provisions of certain License
Agreements with Lucent and NCR pursuant to which Lucent and NCR have licensed
certain trade names and service marks, including the "Lucent Technologies" and
"NCR" trade names, to the Company for use in the business of the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries. The Company's License Agreement with AT&T also has
similar provisions. The initial term of the License Agreements expires on August
4, 2000, but will be automatically renewed in the event of a renewal of the
relevant Operating Agreement, for a term equal to any renewal term of that
Operating Agreement. Each License Agreement may be terminated prior to the end
of its term upon the occurrence of certain events (including upon the
termination of the applicable Operating Agreement and the occurrence of certain
ratings downgrades). In addition, AT&T may require the Company to discontinue,

<PAGE>

following two years' prior notice, use of (i) the "AT&T" trade name as part of
the Company's corporate name and (ii) the other service marks licensed by AT&T
to the Company. The Company's subsidiaries may, in such event, continue to use
the "AT&T" trade name and service marks in connection with the provision of
financing services and otherwise in accordance with the terms of the License
Agreement, which include extensive restrictions on the use thereof in connection
with the issuance of securities.

The Operating Agreements do not apply to the Company's relationship with
AT&T/Lucent/NCR as end-users of information technology and other equipment or
vehicles financed by the Company. Although the Intercompany Agreements between
the Company and AT&T/Lucent/NCR provides that AT&T/Lucent/NCR will view the
Company as its preferred provider of financing, the Intercompany Agreement does
not require AT&T/Lucent/NCR to continue to use the Company as its financing
source for its own acquisitions of such equipment or vehicles if competitors of
the Company offer financing on more attractive terms.

Risks Related to the Termination of AT&T's Ownership Interest in the Company

Business Relationship. Prior to the consummation of the Merger, AT&T had an
approximately 86% economic interest in the Company. The Company believes that it
benefited from that interest because approximately 86% of the profits derived by
the Company from its commercial relationship with AT&T/Lucent/NCR (the Company's
most important commercial relationship "Risk Factors - Changes in Relationship
with AT&T/Lucent/NCR Entities Revenues and Net Income Attributable to the
AT&T/Lucent/NCR Entities", above) directly or indirectly benefited AT&T.
Following the AT&T Restructuring and the consummation of the Merger, the
Company's relationship with AT&T/Lucent or NCR as its principal customers and
sources of business will be based entirely on commercial dealings and its
contract rights, without any ownership interest by AT&T, Lucent or NCR in the
Company. To the extent that this change causes the relations of AT&T, Lucent and
NCR with the Company to be less favorable than in the past, there will be an
adverse effect on the Company.

Certain Increased Costs and Expenses

General. In connection with the consummation of the Merger, pursuant to
which AT&T sold its entire indirect equity interest in the Company, certain of
the Company's annual expenses have increased. A summary of the significant
increases follows.

Borrowing Costs. It is difficult to quantify with reasonable accuracy the
effect of the Merger and the resulting downgrading of ratings on the Company's
debt since the Company's cost of debt post-Merger has been impacted by both the
rating agencies downgrades and the external interest rate environment (see "Risk
Factors - Risks Related to Expected Plans Involving the Company - Sensitivity to
Ratings on Debt", above). However, the Company estimates that since the Merger
it has experienced an increase in borrowing costs of approximately 10 to 20
basis points. Assuming that the Merger and the resulting downgrades had
occurred on January 1, 1996 rather than October 1, 1996, the Company's 1996
interest expense would have increased by approximately $2.1 million to $4.2,
respectively.

<PAGE>

The increase in interest expense was calculated using the 1996 average
commercial paper balance outstanding and the 1996 issuances of medium and
long-term debt multiplied by the incremental borrowing costs.

Also, in connection with the Merger, the Company incurred additional
borrowings associated with the Tax Deconsolidation and increased operating and
administrative expenses (both as described below), as well as the one-time
Merger related costs (see "Results of Operations 1996 vs. 1995," above). Had
the Merger and the related transactions occurred on January 1, 1996 rather than
October 1, 1996, The Company's 1996 interest expense would have increased by
$8.8 million to $17.7 million. This increase in interest expense was calculated
using the Company's nine month period ended September 30, 1996 weighted average
interest rate of 6.38% plus the 10 to 20 basis point increase as discussed
above.

Tax Deconsolidation. The Company was formerly a member of AT&T's
consolidated group for federal income tax purposes, but immediately after the
Merger ceased to be a member of such tax group (the "Tax Deconsolidation"). The
Tax Deconsolidation is expected to have certain adverse effects on the Company
as described below.

Most financings by the Company of products manufactured by AT&T/Lucent/NCR
involve the purchase of such products by the Company and the contemporaneous
lease of such products by the Company to third parties. Sales of such products
to the Company by AT&T/Lucent/NCR now that the parties are unrelated generate
current taxable income for AT&T/Lucent/NCR, together with a liability of
AT&T/Lucent/NCR to pay federal income tax on such income. Notwithstanding such
sales of products, so long as the Company was a part of the AT&T consolidated
federal income tax group at the time of such sale, the payment of such taxes had
been deferred (the amount of such taxes so deferred being herein called "Gross
Profit Tax Deferral") generally until the Company claimed depreciation on the
products, or sold the products outside the group. Pursuant to one of the tax
agreements between AT&T and the Company which had been in effect prior to the
Tax Deconsolidation, AT&T had extended interest-free loans to the Company in an
amount equal to the then outstanding amount of Gross Profit Tax Deferral, as
well as certain other intercompany transactions.

As a result of the Tax Deconsolidation, the Company no longer receives such
loans, which had constituted a competitive advantage to the Company in financing
AT&T/Lucent/NCR products. In addition, the Company was required to repay all
such outstanding loans immediately prior to the Tax Deconsolidation. The
aggregate outstanding principal amount of the interest-free loans associated
with Gross Profit Tax Deferral which were repaid by the Company in connection
with the Tax Deconsolidation was $247.4 million. Additionally, as a result of
the Tax Deconsolidation, the Company made a payment to AT&T of $35 million in
exchange for AT&T's assumption of certain federal and combined state tax
liabilities of the Company relating to periods prior to the Merger.

<PAGE>

Operating and Administrative Expenses. The Company's annual operating and
administrative expenses have increased as a result of the Merger because the
Company no longer receives the discounts accorded by third party suppliers to
AT&T and its subsidiaries or received directly from AT&T. The incremental and
recurring costs in the Company's operating and administrative expenses for which
the Company received such discounts include services for telecommunication,
certain information processing, travel, human resources, real estate, express
mail and insurance services. In addition, annual management and advisory fees of
initially $3.0 million will be paid to Nomura International plc ("NIplc"). The
Company estimates the total increase in operating and administrative expenses to
be approximately $6.0 million annually (including such management and advisory
fees).

Competition

The equipment leasing and finance industry in which the Company operates is
highly competitive and is undergoing a process of consolidation. As a result,
certain of the Company's competitors' relative cost bases have been reduced.
Participants in the industry compete through price (including the ability to
control costs), risk management innovation and customer services. Principal cost
factors include the cost of funds, the cost of selling to or obtaining new
end-user customers and vendors and the cost of managing portfolios. The
Company's competitors include captive or related leasing companies (such as
General Electric Capital Corporation and IBM Credit Corporation), independent
leasing companies (such as Comdisco, Inc.), certain banks engaged in leasing,
lease brokers and investment banking firms that arrange for the financing of
leased equipment, and manufacturers and vendors which lease their own products
to customers. In addition, the Company competes with all banking and other
financial institutions, manufacturers, vendors and others who extend or arrange
credit for the acquisition of equipment, and in a sense, with end-users'
available cash resources to purchase equipment that the Company may otherwise
finance. Many of the competitors of the Company are large companies that have
substantial capital, technological and marketing resources; some of these
competitors are significantly larger than the Company and have access to debt at
a lower cost than the Company. In addition, as a result of certain transactions
related to the Merger, the Company may not have, in the immediate future, access
to sufficient U.S. federal tax capacity to pursue efficiently U.S. tax based
lease financing.

Certain Other Risks

The Company is subject to certain other risks including the risk that its
allowance for credit losses may not prove adequate to cover ultimate losses and
that its estimated residual values will not be realized at the end of the lease
terms. There can be no assurance that such allowance will prove adequate to
cover losses in connection with the Company's investment in finance receivables,
capital leases and operating leases or that such residual values (which have
historically been a significant element of the net income of the Company) will
be realized.

<PAGE>

RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation". This statement establishes financial accounting and reporting
standards for stock-based employee compensation plans. It allows companies to
choose either 1) a fair value method of valuing stock-based compensation plans
which will affect reported net income, or 2) to continue to follow the existing
accounting rules for stock option accounting but disclose what the impacts would
have been had the fair value method been adopted. The Company adopted the
disclosure alternative which requires annual disclosure of the pro forma net
income and earnings per share amounts assuming the fair value method was adopted
on January 1, 1995. As a result, the adoption of this standard did not have any
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements (see Note 13 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements).

In June 1996, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued
SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities". This statement requires that liabilities and
derivatives incurred or obtained by transferors as part of a transfer of
financial assets be initially measured at fair value, if practical. It also
requires that servicing assets and other retained interests in the transferred
assets be measured by allocating the previous carrying amount between the assets
sold, if any, and retained interests, if any, based on their relative fair
values at the date of the transfer. This statement was effective for transfers
and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities occurring
after December 31, 1996 and application is prospective. In December 1996,
SFAS No. 127, "Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions of FASB
Statement No. 125" was issued. Management does not expect the adoption of
either standard to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.

In February 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 129, "Disclosure of Information
about Capital Structure." SFAS No. 129, which is applicable to all entities,
requires disclosure of information about the liquidation preference of
preferred stock, redeemable stock and certain other disclosures. SFAS No. 129
is effective for financial statements for periods ending after December 15,
1997, which for the Company will be 1998. Management does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS No. 129 will have any impact on the consolidated financial
statements.

<PAGE>

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31, 1996 1995
(Dollars in Thousands)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>

ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents $ - $ 3,961
Net investment in finance
receivables 2,135,250 1,800,636
Net investment in capital leases 3,648,731 6,187,131
Net investment in operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation of $777,905 in
1996 and $642,728 in 1995 1,403,470 1,117,636
Deferred charges and other assets 788,935 431,895
Deferred Income taxes 116,126 -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets 8,092,512 9,541,259
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES, PREFERRED SECURITIES AND SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY:
LIABILITIES:
Short-term notes, less unamortized discounts
of $3,112 in 1996 and $9,698 in 1995 1,867,247 2,212,351
Deferred income taxes - 555,296
Payables to affiliates and Former Affiliates 139,706 360,429
Income taxes and other payables 580,575 581,000
Medium and long-term debt 4,597,677 4,716,058
Commitments and contingencies
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities 7,185,205 8,425,134
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREFERRED SECURITIES:
Company-obligated preferred
securities of subsidiary 200,000 -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY:
Common stock, one cent par value:
Authorized 150,000,000 shares in 1996
and 100,000,000 shares in 1995, issued
and outstanding, 90,198,571 shares in 1996 and
46,968,810 in 1995 902 470
Additional paid-in capital 633,676 783,244
Recourse loans to senior executives (15,697) (20,512)
Foreign currency translation adjustments (3,502) (2,173)
Retained earnings 91,928 355,096
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Shareowners' Equity 707,307 1,116,125
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities, Preferred Securities and
Shareowners' Equity $8,092,512 $9,541,259
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.

<PAGE>

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995* 1994*
(Dollars in Thousands)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Finance revenue $ 204,204 $ 174,523 $ 120,800
Capital lease revenue 598,203 586,141 477,875
Rental revenue on operating leases 697,020 560,964 475,375
Revenue from securitizations and
loan sales 164,899 16,374 16,311
Equipment sales 90,631 48,724 126,567
Other revenue, net 197,233 190,309 167,151

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Revenues 1,952,190 1,577,035 1,384,079

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPENSES:
Interest 458,039 411,040 271,812
Operating and administrative 564,489 473,663 427,187
Depreciation on operating leases 455,595 354,509 313,583
Cost of equipment sales 78,538 43,370 116,995
Provision for credit losses 113,605 86,214 80,888

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Expenses 1,670,266 1,368,796 1,210,465

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Distributions on Company-obligated
preferred securities of subsidiary 3,322 - -

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes 278,602 208,239 173,614
Provision for income taxes 110,063 80,684 73,278

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

NET INCOME $ 168,539 $ 127,555 $ 100,336

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

* Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1996
presentation.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.

<PAGE>

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>

Common stock
Balance at beginning of year $ 470 $ 470 $ 469
Repurchase and retirement of shares
in connection with the Merger (471) - -
Stock issuances:
New shares issued as a result of
the Merger 902 - -
Pension and benefit plans 1 - 1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year 902 470 470
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional paid-in capital
Balance at beginning of year 783,244 782,785 780,591
Repurchase and retirement of shares
in connection with the Merger (1,660,174) - -
Stock issuances:
New shares issued as a result
of the Merger 821,583 - -
Pension and benefit plans 1,695 459 2,194
Tax impacts of the Merger:
Capital contribution from Former
Affiliates for lost tax depreciation 279,876 - -
Reduction of deferred tax liabilities
as a result of Section 338(h)10 election 232,929 - -
Establishment of goodwill-deferred tax
asset as a result of Section
338(h)10 election 161,999 - -
Establishment of current tax receivable
relating to tax benefit generated by
Hercules buyout of employee stock options 16,011 - -
Other (3,487) - -
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year 633,676 783,244 782,785
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recourse loans to senior executives
Balance at beginning of year (20,512) (19,651) (17,788)
Loans made (1,381) (2,613) (2,760)
Loans repaid 6,196 1,752 897
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year (15,697) (20,512) (19,651)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Balance at beginning of year (2,173) (2,158) (2,603)
Unrealized translation (loss) gain (1,329) (15) 445
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year (3,502) (2,173) (2,158)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of year 355,096 246,772 163,774
Repurchase and retirement of shares
in connection with the Merger (416,217) - -
Net income 168,539 127,555 100,336
Cash dividends paid (15,490) (19,231) (17,338)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year 91,928 355,096 246,772
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Shareowners' Equity $ 707,307 $1,116,125 $1,008,218
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.

<PAGE>

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995* 1994*
(Dollars in Thousands)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 168,539 $ 127,555 $ 100,336
Noncash items included in income:
Depreciation and amortization 450,430 412,044 353,954
Deferred taxes (269,972) (2,772) 106,384
Provision for credit losses 113,605 86,214 80,888
Revenue from securitizations
and loan sales (164,899) (16,374) (16,311)
(Increase) decrease in deferred
charges and other assets (11,274) 26,596 (130,927)
(Decrease) increase in income taxes
and other payables (35,131) 50,362 3,068
Decrease in payables to
Former Affiliates (18,481) (3,509) (10,257)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities 232,817 680,116 487,135
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of businesses, net of cash
acquired (148,109) (294,472) (234,375)
Purchase of finance asset portfolios (7,339) (19,769) (217,939)
Financings and lease equipment
purchases (6,051,483) (5,467,773) (5,031,041)
Principal collections from
customers, net of amounts
included in income 4,057,766 3,855,592 3,553,620
Cash proceeds from securitizations
and loan sales 3,390,396 291,476 306,406
Increase in payables to affiliates 25,451 - -
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Cash Provided (Used) for
Investing Activities $ 1,266,682 $(1,634,946) $(1,623,329)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

(Continued on next page)

<PAGE>

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Continued)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995* 1994*
(Dollars in Thousands)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
(Decrease) increase in short-term
notes, net $ (345,104) $ (207,045) $ 523,370
Additions to medium and
long-term debt 2,011,705 2,905,920 2,142,993
Repayments of medium and
long-term debt (2,135,693) (1,828,426) (1,448,470)
(Decrease) increase in payables to
affiliates and Former Affiliates (247,400) 53,109 (9,897)
Issuance of Company-obligated
preferred securities 200,000 - -
Proceeds from interim bridge-loan to
fund merger 1,255,286 - -
Repayment of interim bridge-loan to
fund merger (1,255,286) - -
Repurchase of Company common stock (2,076,863) - -
Capital contributions from affiliates
and Former Affiliates 1,101,459 - -
Other merger related items 3,926 - -
Dividends paid (15,490) (19,231) (17,338)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Financing
Activities (1,503,460) 904,327 1,190,658
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash
and Cash Equivalents (3,961) (50,503) 54,464
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Period 3,961 54,464 -
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
End of Period $ - $ 3,961 $ 54,464
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

Interest paid, including discount on commercial paper, was $443.4 million,
$365.5 million and $254.0 million during 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

Net income taxes paid were $373.5 million, $27.8 million and $55.7 million
during 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

<PAGE>

Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:

In conjunction with the Merger, additional paid-in capital increased due to
the elimination of deferred tax liabilities of $232.9 million as a result of the
Section 338(h)(10) election under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and
similar elections in certain state and local jurisdictions and the establishment
of a deferred tax asset of $162.0 million associated with the step-up in basis
to fair value for tax purposes which was not done for book purposes ("push-down
accounting") due to the Company's significant level of public debt outstanding.
See Notes 1 and 12. Also, certain management members of the Company exchanged
their existing shares of Company common stock for new shares totaling $29
million. See Note 1.

In 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company entered into capital lease obligations
of $35.6 million, $105.2 million and $41.4 million, respectively, for equipment
that was subleased. In 1996 and 1995, the Company assumed debt in conjunction
with acquisitions of $3.4 million and $473.0 million, respectively.

* Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1996
presentation.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.

<PAGE>

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands)

1. THE COMPANY AND BACKGROUND

Description of the Company

AT&T Capital Corporation ("AT&T Capital" or the "Company") is a
full-service, diversified equipment leasing and finance company that operates
predominantly in the United States; however, it also has operations in Europe,
Canada, the Asia/Pacific Region, Mexico and South America. The Company operates
primarily in one business segment - equipment leasing and financing. This
segment represents more than 90% of consolidated revenues, net income and total
assets. The Company leases and finances equipment manufactured and distributed
by AT&T Corp. ("AT&T"), Lucent Technologies Inc. ("Lucent") and NCR Corporation
("NCR") (herein, "AT&T/Lucent/NCR" or the "Former Affiliates") and numerous
other companies. The Company also provides inventory financing for equipment
dealers and distributors, Small Business Administration ("SBA") lending, and
equipment management and remarketing services. In addition, the Company offers
its customers high-technology equipment rental and certain other equipment
administration services.

At December 31, 1996, AT&T Capital's portfolio assets were comprised of
general equipment (consists of general office, manufacturing and medical
equipment) aggregating 27%, transportation equipment of 23%, information
technology equipment of 22%, telecommunications equipment totaling 18%, and real
estate of 10%.

AT&T Capital's portfolio assets are diversified among a large customer
base, as well as numerous industries and geographic regions. The Company's
customers are diversified across many industries including manufacturing,
services, communications and retail, as well as many small and mid-size business
customers and federal, state and local governments and their agencies. At
December 31, 1996, on an owned basis, the Company's 98 largest customers (after
AT&T and Lucent) accounted for approximately 24% of the Company's net portfolio
assets, and no customer (with the exception of AT&T and Lucent) accounted for
more than 1% of such net portfolio assets.

Other than AT&T/Lucent/NCR, as of December 31, 1996, management is not
aware of any significant concentration of business transacted with a particular
customer, supplier or lender that could severely impact the Company's
operations. Also, the Company does not have a concentration regarding the types
of financing products or available sources of debt, labor or services, or
licenses or other rights that could severely impact its operations.

<PAGE>

Sale of the Company and Related Transactions

On September 20, 1995, AT&T announced a plan to pursue the public or
private sale of its remaining 86% interest in AT&T Capital. On such date, AT&T
also announced a plan to separate (the "Separation") into three publicly-held
stand-alone global businesses (AT&T, Lucent and NCR). In connection with the
Separation, AT&T sold approximately 17.6% of its equity interest in Lucent in an
initial public offering on April 10, 1996 and spun-off its entire remaining
equity interest in Lucent to AT&T shareowners on September 30, 1996. On December
31, 1996 AT&T spun off its 100% interest in NCR to AT&T shareowners.

On June 5, 1996, AT&T Capital entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger ("the Merger Agreement") with AT&T, Hercules and Antigua Acquisition
Corporation ("Antigua"). Hercules is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary
of GRS Holding Company, Ltd., which owns a U.K. rail leasing business.

On September 30, 1996 the Company, pursuant to a Gross Profit Tax Deferral
Interest Free Loan Agreement (the "GPTD Agreement") between the Company and
AT&T, made a payment of $247.4 million to AT&T for full repayment of such loans.
See Note 12 for additional discussion of GPTD and other tax implications of the
Merger.

On October 1, 1996, the Company completed a merger (the "Merger") pursuant
to which Antigua, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hercules, was merged with and
into the Company. As a result of the Merger, AT&T Capital's shareowners received
$45 in cash for each outstanding share of the Company's common stock, and
Hercules and certain management team members (the "Management Investors") became
the sole owners of the Company's common stock. The aggregate purchase price for
the then outstanding shares of the Company's outstanding common stock and the
aggregate amount necessary to cash-out the Company's stock options in accordance
with the Merger Agreement (the "Merger Consideration") was approximately $2.2
billion. The Merger Consideration was comprised of (i) a loan from Goldman Sachs
Credit Partners L.P. in the amount of approximately $1.3 billion, which was to
mature on October 30, 1996 and was repaid by the Company from a portion of the
proceeds of a $3.1 billion offering of equipment receivable-backed securities by
affiliates of the Company on October 15, 1996 (see Note 6) and (ii) equity
contributions (collectively, the "Equity Contributions") represented by (a)
capital contributions of $871 million from Hercules, (b) exchange by the
Management Investors of approximately $29 million and (c) the settlement of
approximately $5 million of recourse loans to senior executives. Also, in
connection with the Merger, the Company, through a consolidated subsidiary,
issued to the public $200 million of company-obligated preferred securities (see
Note 9) and the proceeds of which were used to pay down short term debt.

<PAGE>

In connection with the Merger, the Company incurred a $47.6 million
expense relating to the accelerated payout of the Company's Share Performance
Incentive Plan ("SPIP") and other payments to certain officers of the Company
(see Note 13), an $11.0 million expense relating to the Company's Merger related
and other transaction costs offset by a $6.2 million credit related to the
reversal of tax reserves no longer needed as a result of the AT&T tax indemnity
payment described further in Note 12.

On October 15, 1996 the Company securitized $3.1 billion of lease and loan
receivables. As previously noted a portion of the Securitization proceeds were
used to finance the Merger transaction. In connection with the Securitization
the Company recorded an after-tax gain of approximately $79 million. See Note 6
for a further discussion of securitizations.

On October 25, 1996 the Company, through a subsidiary, issued to the public
eight million shares of company-obligated preferred securities for $25 per
share. Holders of the securities will be entitled to receive cash distributions
at an annual rate of 9.06%, which is guaranteed by the Company. See Note 9 for
further discussion of the preferred offering.

Relationship of the Company with the Former Affiliates

In the second quarter of 1996, the Company executed an Operating
Agreement (pursuant to which, among other things, the Company serves as
preferred provider of financing services and has certain related and other
rights and privileges in connection with the financing of equipment to the
customers of AT&T/Lucent/NCR) with each of Lucent and NCR, and entered into
letter agreements with Lucent and NCR regarding the applicability to Lucent and
NCR of specified provisions of a License Agreement (the "License Agreement") and
the Intercompany Agreement (Note 14) between the Company and AT&T (see Note 12).
None of the Former Affiliates is required to renew the term of its Operating
Agreement beyond the expiration of the current term on August 4, 2000.

Although the Company will seek to maintain and improve its existing
relationships with Lucent, NCR and AT&T and seek to extend each of the Operating
Agreements beyond August 4, 2000, no assurance can be given that the Operating
Agreements, License Agreements or Intercompany Agreements, will be extended
beyond such date or, if extended, that the terms and conditions thereof will not
be modified in a manner adverse to the Company. Failure to renew NCR's and
Lucent's Operating Agreements on terms not adverse to the Company could have a
material adverse effect on the Company (see the Risk Factors included in the
Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations).

<PAGE>

Pursuant to the License Agreement, AT&T has licensed to the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries certain trade names and service marks, including but
not limited to the AT&T Capital Corporation, AT&T Credit Corporation, AT&T
Systems Leasing and AT&T Automotive Services names. The License Agreement
provides that AT&T may require (as a result of their disposition of the Company
and upon one year's notice and generally at AT&T's expense) the Company to
discontinue the use of the "AT&T" name as part of its corporate name. The
Company's subsidiaries may, notwithstanding such event, continue to use the
other AT&T licensed names (including NCR) and service marks pursuant to the
License Agreement (e.g., as part of such subsidiaries' corporate names and for
marketing purposes), subject to extensive restrictions on the use thereof in
connection with the issuance of securities and incurrence of indebtedness. As of
the date of these financial statements, AT&T has not made such request.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements reflect, and the future
consolidated financial statements of the Company will reflect, the historical
cost of the Company's assets and liabilities. Adjustments to the Company's
consolidated financial statements to reflect the fair value of the Company's
assets and liabilities as of the merger date ("push down" accounting) will not
be reflected due to the existence of substantial publicly traded debt of the
Company.

Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all
majority-owned subsidiaries. The accounts of operations located outside of the
United States are included on the basis of their fiscal years, ended either
November 30, or December 31.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and revenues and expenses during the period reported. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Significant areas in which estimates are used
include residual values, income taxes, securitization reserves, allowance for
credit losses and contingencies.

Revenue Recognition for Finance Receivables and Capital Leases

For loans and other financing contracts ("Finance Receivables"), revenue is
recognized over the life of the contract using the interest method.

<PAGE>

For leases classified as Capital Leases, the difference between (i) the sum
of the minimum lease payments due and the estimated unguaranteed residual values
and (ii) the asset purchase price paid by the Company is initially recorded as
unearned income. The difference is subsequently amortized over the life of the
lease contract and recognized as revenue, using the interest method.

Accrual of income on portfolio assets is generally suspended when a loan or
a lease becomes contractually delinquent for 90 days or more (or earlier if
deemed necessary). Accrual is resumed when the receivable becomes contractually
current and management believes there is no longer any significant probability
of loss.

Investment in Operating Leases

Equipment under Operating Leases is generally depreciated over the
estimated useful life of the asset. During the term of the related lease, annual
depreciation is generally calculated on a straight-line basis based on the
estimated residual values at the end of the respective lease terms. Rental
revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related lease terms.

Estimated Unguaranteed Residual Values

Estimated unguaranteed residual values are established upon acquisition and
leasing of the equipment based upon the estimated value of the equipment at the
end of the lease term. They are determined on the basis of studies prepared by
the Company, professional appraisals, historical experience and industry data.
Although it is reasonably possible that a change in the unguaranteed residual
values could occur in the near term, the Company actively manages its residual
values by working with lessees and vendors during the lease term to encourage
lessees to extend their leases or upgrade and enhance their leased equipment.
Residual values are reviewed by the Company at least annually. Declines in
residual values for capital leases are recognized as an immediate charge to
income. Declines in residual values for operating leases are recognized as
adjustments to depreciation expense over the shorter of the useful life of the
asset or the remaining term of the lease.

Upon the sale or securitization of substantially all of the receivables
associated with a capital lease, the associated residual value is frozen at its
then current book value. Such residual value ceases to accrete to its estimated
value at the end of the lease term.

Allowance for Credit Losses

In connection with the financing of leases and other receivables, the
Company records an allowance for credit losses to provide for estimated losses
in the portfolio. The allowance for credit losses is estimated by management
considering delinquencies and problem assets, an assessment of overall risks and
evaluation of probable losses in the portfolio given its diversification, and a
review of historical loss experience. Although

<PAGE>

currently deemed adequate by management, it is reasonably possible that a change
in the estimate could occur in the near term as a result of changes in the above
mentioned factors. The Company's reserve policy is based on an analysis of the
aging of the Company's portfolio, a review of all non- accrual receivables and
leases, and prior collection experience. An account is charged off when analysis
indicates that the account is uncollectible. Additionally, Company policy
generally requires the "at risk" portion (the amount of the receivable not
covered by estimated equipment or other collateral value) of accounts 180 days
past due to be reserved for or charged off.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Other Assets

The cost of property and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis
over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from three to
twenty-five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the
term of the related lease or the estimated useful lives of the related assets on
a straight-line basis.

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of companies acquired over the
fair value of their net assets on the date of acquisition, and is amortized as a
charge against income on a straight-line basis generally over three to twenty
year periods. Goodwill in excess of associated expected operating cash flows is
considered to be impaired and is written down to fair value. The accompanying
consolidated balance sheet caption Deferred Charges and Other Assets includes
$104.6 million and $114.7 million of goodwill at December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The accompanying consolidated statements of income caption
Operating and Administrative Expenses includes $12.6 million, $13.2 million and
$10.7 million of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. See Note 3, "Acquisitions" for discussion of the Company's recent
acquisition activities.

Securitization Recourse Reserves

The Company securitized certain portfolio assets as part of its funding
strategy. The securitization agreements provide for limited recourse to the
Company for certain uncollectible amounts. The Company recorded the present
value of such recourse obligations using a discount rate of 6.5%. These recourse
obligations would have been approximately $3.9 million higher had the Company
not discounted these recourse obligations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into derivative financial instruments, mainly interest
rate swaps and currency swaps, to hedge interest rate and foreign currency
exchange risk and to match fund assets and liabilities. Interest rate swaps
generally involve the exchange of interest payments without the exchange of
underlying notional principal amounts. Currency swaps

<PAGE>

generally involve both the exchange of principal and interest payments in
distinct currencies. The criteria which must be satisfied for hedges are as
follows: (1) the asset or liability to be hedged exposes AT&T Capital, as a
whole, to interest rate or currency exchange risk, (2) the derivative acts to
reduce the interest rate or currency exchange risk by reducing the sensitivity
to interest rate or currency exchange movements, and (3) the derivative is
designated and effective as a hedge.

For interest rate swaps, the Company records the net interest to be
received or paid as an adjustment to interest expense. In the event of an early
termination of a swap contract, the gain or loss on swap accounted for as a
hedge is amortized over the remaining life of the related transaction. The
Company does not enter into speculative swaps; however, if the underlying
transaction associated with a swap accounted for as a hedge is terminated early,
the swap is then considered speculative. The gain or loss on a speculative swap
is recognized immediately.

The Company enters into foreign exchange contracts as a hedge against
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. Gains and losses are
recognized on the contracts and offset foreign exchange gains or losses on the
related assets and liabilities.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of the Company's foreign operations are translated
into U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation", the resulting translation
adjustments are recorded as a separate component of shareowners' equity. A
transaction gain or loss realized upon settlement of a foreign currency
transaction generally is included in determining net income for the period in
which the transaction is settled.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Effective October 1, 1995, the Company adopted SFAS No. 121, "Accounting
for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
of". This standard requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. An impairment has occurred when the estimate of
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset is less
than its carrying amount. If an impairment occurred, the measurement of the
impairment is based on the fair value of the asset. Since adoption, no
impairment losses have been recognized.

<PAGE>

3. ACQUISITIONS

In the third quarter of 1996, the Company acquired the operating assets
and lease portfolio of Municipal Leasing Corporation. This Canadian operation
has been financing office equipment and automobiles for the past 15 years and
had approximately $160 million in assets at the time of the acquisition.

On January 4, 1995, the Company acquired the vendor leasing and finance
companies of Banco Central Hispano and certain of its affiliates ("CFH Leasing
International") located in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Belgium
and the Netherlands. CFH Leasing International provides financial services to
equipment manufacturers and vendors and had approximately $540 million in assets
at the time of acquisition. In addition, on June 30, 1995, the Company acquired
two relatively small businesses, a United States mid-range computer asset
business with approximately $180 million in assets and an Australian equipment
finance company with approximately $40 million in assets. The above acquisitions
were accounted for under the purchase method and the total cash paid, net of
cash acquired, for all of the above was $294.5 million. The Company assumed
certain existing debt associated with these acquisitions. The results of
operations are included in the income statement of the Company from the
respective acquisition dates.

<PAGE>

4. NET INVESTMENT IN FINANCE RECEIVABLES AND CAPITAL LEASES

Finance receivables and capital leases consisted of the following:

Finance
Receivables Capital Leases
------------------------- ---------------------------
At December 31, 1996 1995 1996 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Receivables $ 2,294,054 $ 1,959,004 $ 4,056,152 $ 6,846,834
Estimated unguaranteed
residual values - - 380,325 734,140
Unearned income (105,289) (104,170) (680,670 (1,230,418)
Allowance for credit losses (53,515) (54,198) (107,076) (163,425)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net investment $ 2,135,250 $ 1,800,636 $ 3,648,731 $ 6,187,131
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

For a discussion regarding the Company's securitization activities, see
Notes 1 and 6.

The schedule of maturities at December 31, 1996 for the finance receivables
and capital leases is as follows:

Finance Capital
Receivables Leases
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <C> <C>
1997 $ 611,030 $1,658,499
1998 313,448 1,096,906
1999 217,864 664,340
2000 207,054 329,225
2001 220,470 144,106
2002 and thereafter 724,188 163,076
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $2,294,054 $4,056,152
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

Effective January 1, 1995, the Company adopted SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by
Creditors for Impairment of a Loan", and No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosures". These standards
require that impaired loans be measured based on the present value of expected
cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or, the loan's
observable market price or, the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent, as well as requiring certain related disclosures. The
adoption of these statements did not have a material effect on the Company's
consolidated financial statements. The amount of impaired loans at December 31,
1996 and 1995 was not material.

<PAGE>

5. NET INVESTMENT IN OPERATING LEASES

The following is a summary of equipment under operating leases at December
31, 1996 and 1995, including equipment on lease to Former Affiliates (see Notes
1 and 14):

At December 31, 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Original equipment cost:
Information technology $ 673,298 $ 628,857
Telecommunications 557,567 378,426
Transportation 550,242 456,575
General equipment and other 354,658 254,984
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,135,765 1,718,842
Less: Accumulated depreciation (777,905) (642,728)
Rental receivables, net 45,610 41,522
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net investment in operating leases $ 1,403,470 $ 1,117,636
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

Minimum future rentals to be received on noncancelable operating leases as
of December 31, 1996, are as follows:

<TABLE>

<C> <C>
1997 $ 565,921
1998 335,728
1999 180,844
2000 66,367
2001 22,296
2002 and thereafter 3,330
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total minimum future rentals $1,174,486

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

6. SECURITIZATIONS AND LOAN SALES

In 1996, the Company securitized approximately $3.4 billion of lease and
loan receivables and recorded a $149.3 million pre-tax gain. Total proceeds from
the 1996 securitizations was approximately $3.1 billion. The 1996 activity
includes the Securitization of $3.1 billion of lease and loan receivables (which
includes $0.3 billion of receivables previously sold and repurchased by the
Company). A portion of the Securitization proceeds were used to finance the
Merger transaction (see Note 1). For the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994,
the Company securitized portions of its capital lease portfolio amounting to
$74.8 million and $259.1 million, with proceeds received of $86.8 million and
$287.6 million, respectively. The Company recorded pre-tax gains on
securitizations of $5.9 million and $14.8 million for 1995 and 1994,
respectively.

Included in other assets at December 31, 1996 and 1995, is approximately
$195.9 million and $61.5 million of retained interests in the securitized
receivables. These retained interests act as a credit enhancement for the
purchasers and are repaid to the Company over the life of the securitized
receivables. The securitization agreements provide for limited recourse to the
Company for any uncollectible amounts. The Company's maximum exposure under
these recourse provisions, in the unlikely event that all such receivables
became uncollectible, amounted to $104.9 million at December 31, 1996 and $254.8
million at December 31, 1995. A portion of the gains have been deferred to
record an estimate of the losses under recourse provisions for the lease
receivables securitized (see Note 2). Under the agreements, the Company services
these accounts for a fee on behalf of the purchasers.

At December 31, 1996 and 1995, $2,984.7 million and $559.0 million,
respectively, of receivables previously securitized remained outstanding.

On a periodic basis, the Company sells the guaranteed portion of SBA loans
in the secondary market. The gain on these sales is 1) decreased by an
adjustment to reduce the carrying value of the retained unguaranteed portion of
the loan to its fair value and 2) adjusted for any excess servicing fees to be
received. For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 the Company sold
approximately $170.2 million, $146.7 million and $15.7 million, with proceeds
received of $184.9 million, $157.2 million, and $19.6 million, respectively. The
Company recorded pre-tax gains on SBA loan sales of $15.6 million, $10.5 million
and $1.5 million for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

<PAGE>

7. OTHER REVENUE

Other revenue consisted of the following:

For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995* 1994*
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net gain on sale of leased and off-lease
equipment $ 86,639 $ 86,987 $ 76,453
Portfolio servicing fees 20,303 23,584 27,203
Other fee related revenue 51,449 44,105 38,871
Other portfolio related revenue 38,842 35,633 24,624
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other revenue $197,233 $190,309 $167,151
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

* Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1996 presentation.

8. DEBT

Commercial Paper

Commercial paper is generally issued at a discount with the majority
maturing within 90 days. As of December 31, 1996 the maturities of commercial
paper ranged up to 45 days. As of December 31, 1995 the maturities of commercial
paper ranged up to four months. Interest rates ranged from 5.60% to 7.20% and
5.48% to 5.83% at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The discount
amortized on commercial paper, which reflects the cost of such debt, amounted to
$100.3 million, $94.0 million and $69.3 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.

<PAGE>

Data with respect to short-term notes (principally commercial paper) are as
follows:

1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
End of year balance, net $1,867,247 $2,212,351 $2,176,877
Weighted average interest rate at
December 31, 6.1% 5.9% 5.8%
Highest month-end balance $3,021,459 $2,212,351 $2,176,877
Average month-end balance (a) $2,154,614 $1,921,298 $1,741,872
Weighted average interest rate (b) 5.7% 5.3% 4.3%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(a) The average month-end balance was computed by dividing the total of the
outstanding month-end balances by the number of months.

(b) The weighted average interest rate during the year is calculated by
dividing the interest charged for the year by the average month-end
balance.

Medium and Long-term Debt

Medium and long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 1996 and 1995,
consisted of the following:

Maturities 1996 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <C> <C> <C>
4.44% - 5.99% Medium-term notes 1996 - 2001 $1,331,900 $ 716,900
6.00% - 6.99% Medium-term notes 1996 - 2000 1,621,525 1,466,025
7.00% - 8.08% Medium-term notes 1996 - 2005 621,625 1,043,825
Floating rate Medium-term notes
Interest periodically reprices
based on various indices. As of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, the
average interest rate ranged
from 5.47%-5.65% and 4.93%-5.74%,
respectively. 1996 - 1997 682,000 1,129,500
Other long-term debt 1996 - 2002 340,627 359,808
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total medium and long-term debt 4,597,677 $4,716,058
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

The Company's medium and long-term debt matures as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997 $2,418,753
1998 1,326,375
1999 611,346
2000 88,599
2001 34,773
2002 and thereafter 117,831
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $4,597,677

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

To reduce exposure to interest rate movements, the Company enters into
interest rate swap agreements (see Note 15). The weighted average interest rate
on average total debt outstanding, including the effect of these swaps, was
6.38% and 6.60% for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.

In connection with transactions preceding the initial public offering of
the Company's stock in 1993, AT&T issued a guarantee on all of the Company's
debt outstanding at that date. As of December 31, 1996 and 1995, $189,675 and
$319,200 of medium and long-term debt was guaranteed by AT&T, respectively.

9. COMPANY-OBLIGATED PREFERRED SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY

In the fourth quarter of 1996, Capita Preferred Trust (the "Trust") issued
$200 million of Trust Originated Preferred Securities (the "Preferred
Securities") to the public (the "Offering"). The Trust invested the proceeds
received from the Offering and its issuance of common securities to the Company
in exchange for Partnership Preferred Securities of its affiliate, Capita
Preferred Funding L.P. (the "Partnership"). The Trust and the Partnership are
consolidated subsidiaries of the Company. The Partnership, in turn, used
proceeds from the issuance of the Partnership Preferred Securities and a Company
capital contribution to invest primarily in 20-year debentures of the Company
and two wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Debentures"). Payments in respect to the
Debentures issued by the Company's subsidiaries have been guaranteed, on a
subordinated basis, by the Company.

Holders of the 8,000,000 shares of Preferred Securities will be entitled to
receive quarterly cash distributions at an annual rate of 9.06% and a
liquidation amount of $25 per share. Under the terms of the Offering, the
Company issued an irrevocable guarantee, to the extent the Trust has funds
available therefore, on the distributions, redemption and liquidation of the
Preferred Securities. Distribution will be made on the Preferred Securities to
the extent that the Trust has funds available, which is dependent on the payment
of distributions on the Partnership Preferred Securities by the Partnership to
its limited partner, the Trust. Distributions on the Partnership Preferred
Securities will be declared and paid only as determined in the sole discretion
of the Company in its capacity as the general partner of the Partnership. The
Partnership's ability to pay such distributions to the Trust is dependent on the
receipt of interest payments on the Debentures from the Company and its two
subsidiaries.

<PAGE>

The table below shows summarized consolidated financial information of
the Company's two subsidiaries, AT&T Capital Leasing Services, Inc. and AT&T
Capital Services Corporation which have issued the Debentures. The summarized
financial information includes transactions with the Company that are eliminated
in consolidation.

AT&T Capital Leasing Services, Inc.
At or for the years ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues $ 244,560 $ 197,537 $158,973
Interest expense 69,490 62,420 35,741
Operating and administrative expenses 86,121 85,621 77,607
Provision for credit losses 51,862 39,996 33,942
Income before income taxes 34,509 7,234 9,134
Net income 20,733 4,241 $ 5,465

Total assets 628,943 1,387,325
Total debt 507,180 1,061,640
Total liabilities 597,203 1,214,257
Total shareowner's equity $ 31,742 $ 173,068
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AT&T Capital Services Corporation
At or for the years ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues $ 111,572 $ 84,732 $70,134
Interest expense 5,157 4,046 2,864
Operating and administrative expenses 46,423 36,108 33,420
Provision for credit losses 650 107 -
Income before income taxes 10,260 7,724 1,837
Net income 6,098 4,385 $ 954

Total assets 161,232 116,952
Total debt 116,545 72,635
Total liabilities 145,565 99,031
Total shareowner's equity $ 15,667 $ 17,921

</TABLE>

The significant decrease in AT&T Capital Leasing Services, Inc. total
assets is due to significant securitization activity. See Note 6 for further
discussion of securitizations.

10. DIVIDENDS

On February 29, 1996, shareowners of record as of February 9, 1996, were
paid a fourth quarter 1995 dividend of $ .11 per share. During 1996, the
Company's Board of Directors declared dividends each of $.11 per share to
shareowners of record as of May 10, 1996 and August 9, 1996 payable on May 31,
1996 and August 30, 1996, respectively. As a result of the Merger, the Company
anticipates that it will no longer pay dividends in the short-term.

<PAGE>

11. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Fair value is a subjective and imprecise measurement that is based on
assumptions and market data which require significant judgment and may only be
valid at a particular point in time. The use of different market assumptions or
valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value
amounts. Accordingly, management cannot provide assurance that the fair values
presented are indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a
current market exchange.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value
of each class of financial instruments at December 31, 1996 and 1995:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Net Investment in Finance Receivables

The fair value of the finance receivable portfolio is estimated by
discounting the expected future cash flows using the current rates at which
similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the
same remaining maturities.

Short-term Notes (Commercial Paper and Other Short-term Notes)

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value for commercial
paper. Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of other short-term
notes.

Gross Profit Tax Deferral Payable to AT&T

The fair value of the gross profit tax deferral was estimated by
discounting the expected future cash flows using the Company's current cost of
debt. Based on the announcement that AT&T intended to sell its interest in the
Company, this amount for 1995 had been calculated based on the assumption that
the amount would have been repaid by December 31, 1996. On September 30, 1996
the Company repaid the then outstanding balance of $247.4 million to AT&T for
full repayment of such loans (see Note 1).

Medium and Long-term Debt

Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing debt.

Interest Rate and Currency Swap Agreements

The fair value of interest rate and currency swaps is estimated by
discounting the expected future cash flows using an estimated rate at which the
Company could terminate the swaps in the market today.

<PAGE>

Foreign Exchange Contracts

The fair value of foreign exchange contracts is estimated based on current
market quotes obtained from dealers for foreign exchange contracts with the same
remaining terms.

Credit Facilities

The fair values of the credit facilities are based on fees currently paid
for similar arrangements.

The following table summarizes the carrying and fair values of on-balance
sheet instruments (as determined using the methods described above):

December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ - $ - $ 3,961 $ 3,961
Net investment in finance
receivables (Note 4) 2,135,250 2,140,878 1,800,636 1,844,617
Liabilities:
Short-term notes (Note 8) 1,867,247 1,867,247 2,212,351 2,212,403
Gross profit tax deferral
payable to AT&T (Note 12) - - 248,902 237,845
Medium and long-term debt
(Note 8) $4,597,677 $4,663,012 $4,716,058 $4,844,594
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

Matching maturities of its portfolio assets and debt is a key component of
the financial strategy used by the Company to manage interest rate risk. Based
on unaudited calculations performed by the Company, the increased fair value of
the Company's debt (including the effects of interest rate and currency swaps,
as shown below) has been offset by the increased fair value of the Company's
portfolio assets at December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, respectively. The
fair value of the Company's lease portfolio is not a required disclosure under
SFAS No. 107, "Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments" and,
therefore, only the fair value of the finance receivable portfolio has been
disclosed.

<PAGE>

The following tables summarize the carrying and fair values of off-balance
sheet financial instruments (as determined using methods described above):

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Amount Fair Value
Receivable Payable Receivable Payable

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest rate swap agreements $ 258 $ (2,662) $14,247 $(26,318)
Currency swap agreements 69 (1,255) 3,407 (14,870)
Foreign currency forward
exchange contracts $ 7,807 $(21,405) $ (931) $(25,654)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

December 31, 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Amount Fair Value
Receivable Payable Receivable Payable

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest rate swap agreements $ 3,681 $(1,477) $ 2,234 $(53,359)
Currency swap agreements 278 (1,185) 7,066 (8,235)
Foreign currency forward
exchange contracts $13,104 $ (814) $(3,036) $ (2,227)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Hedging the net cash inflows from foreign denominated assets is a key
component of the financial strategy used by the Company to manage its exposure
to foreign currency fluctuations. Based on unaudited calculations performed by
the Company, the decreased fair value of the Company's forward exchange
contracts is generally offset by an increase in the fair value of the Company's
foreign denominated assets.

The Company has unused revolving credit facilities totaling $1.8 billion
and approximately $26.2 million of unused foreign credit facilities. The fair
value of the credit facilities is based upon fees currently paid for similar
arrangements which are not material (see Note 8).

<PAGE>

12. INCOME TAXES

As a result of the Merger, the Company is no longer included in the
consolidated federal and state returns of AT&T and will file a stand-alone
consolidated federal income tax return ("Tax Deconsolidation"). When the Company
was included in AT&T's returns, the Company's income tax expense would not have
differed materially from that reported had the Company filed tax returns on a
stand-alone basis.

In connection with the Merger, Hercules and AT&T made an election under
Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Service Code (the "Section 338(h)(10)
election") and similar elections under state and local laws. Under these
elections the Merger was deemed to be an asset sale for tax purposes resulting
in the elimination of substantially all deferred tax liabilities as of the
Merger date. In addition, the Company stepped-up its assets and liabilities to
their fair value for tax purposes, which was not done for book purposes
("push-down accounting") due to the Company's significant level of public debt
outstanding. Such difference between books and taxes, generated a deferred tax
asset, the "Merger-related tax goodwill".

In connection with AT&T's sale of its 86% interest in the Company, AT&T
agreed to pay the Company approximately $280 million for lost tax depreciation
relating to the Section 338(h)(10) election. The Company offset such receivable
from AT&T with amounts owed to AT&T for income taxes due as of the Merger date.
The Company is also entitled to a tax deduction for the cash-out of the
Company's stock options by Hercules. The tax benefit of such payment reduced the
Company's current tax liability by approximately $16.0 million. At December 31,
1996 and 1995 the Company had a current tax receivable of $6.9 million and
current taxes payable of $30.6 million, respectively.

As part of the GPTD Agreement the Company has, in the past, received
interest free loans to the extent of the tax deferrals generated by transactions
between AT&T and the Company. On September 30, 1996 the Company, pursuant to the
GPTD Agreement, made a payment of $247.4 million to AT&T for full repayment of
such loans. The GPTD Agreement required the Company to repay such loans
immediately prior to the Company no longer being a member of AT&T's consolidated
group for federal income tax purposes. These interest free loans amounted to
$248.9 million at December 31, 1995. The average balance outstanding for such
loans was $248.9 million, $245.9 million and $213.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 1996 and the years ending December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Also on September 30, 1996, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the
Company made a $35.0 million payment to AT&T in exchange for AT&T assuming all
tax liabilities associated with federal and combined state taxes for periods
prior to the consummation of the Merger.

In addition, following Tax Deconsolidation, it is possible that the
Company could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. A Company's
alternative minimum tax liability is computed by applying the alternative
minimum tax rate, which is lower than the regular tax rate, to a measure of
taxable income that is broader than that used in computing the regular tax.
Payments of any alternative minimum tax incurred by the Company after a Tax
Deconsolidation would be available in the future as credits against the
Company's regular tax liability.

<PAGE>

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following:

For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $ 289,942 $59,252 $(13,494)
State and local 68,409 13,415 (23,150)
Foreign 21,384 10,789 3,538
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current portion 379,735 83,456 (33,106)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred:
Federal (221,720) (5,460) 72,729
State and local (49,878) 205 33,655
Foreign 1,926 2,483 -
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred portion (269,672) (2,772) 106,384
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total provision for income taxes $ 110,063 $80,684 $ 73,278
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

The Company recorded tax credits of $20,762, $10,850 and $3,446 in 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively.

Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following:

At December 31,
1996 1995*
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Gross deferred income tax liabilities:
Lease related differences $ (999) $(692,440)
Securitization-related (54,519) (2)
Pensions (1,176) -
Other (5,347) (51,618)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross deferred income tax liabilities (62,041) (744,060)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross deferred income tax assets:
Merger-related tax goodwill 159,604 -
Allowance for credit losses 5,644 124,186
Pensions - 11,718
State and foreign net operating losses 7,205 17,926
Deferred Foreign Tax Credit 23,237 7,000
Other 4,476 32,982
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross deferred income tax assets 200,166 193,812
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Valuation allowance (21,999) (5,048)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) $ 116,126 $(555,296)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

*Certain 1995 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1996
presentation.

<PAGE>

As a result of the step-up allowed under the Section 338(h)(10)
election, substantially all the deferred tax liabilities arising from lease
related differences were eliminated. In addition, the Merger-related tax
goodwill created a deferred tax asset.

A valuation allowance has been recorded to offset certain deferred tax
assets due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of foreign tax credits
and foreign net operating loss carryforwards.

A valuation allowance has not been established for non-foreign deferred
tax assets. Management believes that based upon its consistent history of
profitable operations, coupled with its forecast of taxable income, which
employs certain tax-planning strategies, it is probable that non-foreign
deferred tax assets of approximately $135 million will be realized on future tax
returns, primarily through the generation of future taxable income. The ultimate
realization of the deferred tax assets will require aggregate taxable income of
approximately $320 million to $350 million in future years.

A reconciliation between the federal statutory tax rate and the
Company's effective tax rate is shown below:

For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal statutory income tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State and local income taxes, net of federal
income tax effect 4.3 4.2 3.9
Tax exempt income (1.4) (1.6) (1.7)
Goodwill 0.3 0.5 1.2
Foreign Taxes 1.0 1.0 (0.1)
Other 0.3 0.4 3.9
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effective tax rate 39.5% 38.7% 42.2%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The Company has no available AMT credit carryforwards at December
31, 1996 to reduce future federal income taxes payable.

For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the consolidated
income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change by
domestic and foreign source was $296,876 and $(18,274), $210,296 and $(2,057),
$177,662 and $(4,048), respectively.

<PAGE>

13. PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS

Pension

Effective January 1, 1994, all employees of the Company and its domestic
subsidiaries were covered by the AT&T Capital Corporation Retirement and Savings
Plan ("RSP"), a qualified defined contribution plan.

Under a defined contribution plan, the amount of future pension benefits is
based solely on the amount contributed and the returns earned on those amounts.
The RSP has a profit sharing component (including a cash or deferred
arrangement) under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and a money
purchase component. The Company's annual contribution under the profit sharing
component, which is discretionary above 5%, is expected to equal approximately
9% of employee pay (i.e., aggregate base salaries and annual incentives of
participants in the RSP). In addition, under the money purchase component, the
Company matches an amount equal to 66-2/3% of the first 6% of compensation that
each employee contributes to the RSP under Section 401(k). RSP participants can
select from a variety of funds within the RSP to invest their allotments. The
Company recorded $14,954, $14,367 and $13,525 of pension expense in 1996, 1995
and 1994, respectively, related to the RSP. In addition, in 1996, 1995 and 1994
the Company recorded pension expense of $2,649, $2,431 and $1,366, respectively,
in connection with RSP-related nonqualified defined contribution plans. The
Company also sponsors various international plans which are available to certain
employees of its international subsidiaries. The plans are similar to the RSP,
in that they enable employees of the Company to contribute a percentage of their
salary to provide for postretirement income. The Company recorded $1,736, $1,412
and $1,034 of pension expense in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, related to
the various international plans.

At the date of the Merger, as a result of the change in control provisions
in the RSP, all participants became fully vested.

The Company sponsors three unfunded supplemental nonqualified defined
benefit retirement plans that provide certain employees with additional benefits
after retirement. Components of net periodic pension cost for the years ended
December 31, were:

1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Service cost - benefits earned $ 595 $ 456
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 608 450
Amortization 490 365
Settlement loss* 455 -
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic pension cost after settlement loss $2,148 $1,271
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

*In 1996, lump sums were paid to certain participants upon separation of their
service.

<PAGE>

The funded status of the plans at December 31 was:

1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated benefit obligations:
Vested benefit obligation $5,926 $1,495
Non-vested benefit obligation 1,104 5,471
Total 7,030 6,966
Additional benefits on estimated future salary level 1,306 1,434
Total projected benefit obligation 8,336 8,400

Plan assets at fair value - -

Unfunded projected benefit obligation 8,336 8,400

Unrecognized prior service cost 4,413 4,845
Unrecognized net loss 1,413 945
Additional liability 4,773 4,458
Accrued pension liability recorded $7,283 $7,068
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the projected benefit obligation was
determined using assumed weighted average discount rates of 7.50% and 7.0%
respectively, and assumed long-term rates of increase in future compensation
levels of 4.5% or 5.5% in both years, depending on the plan.

Share Performance Incentive Plan

Prior to the Merger, the Company's Share Performance Incentive Plan, as
amended ("SPIP"), was designed to provide the opportunity for cash incentive
awards to key employees at the end of five three-year performance periods. The
first such period terminated on June 30, 1996, with each of the other
performance periods ending on the annual anniversary of such date through and
including June 30, 2000. These incentive awards were generally based on the
performance of the Company's stock price and dividend yield relative to the
interest rate on three-year treasury notes and the total return on the stock
relative to a specified peer group of financial services companies over three
year performance periods. The estimated compensation expense relating to the
SPIP has been charged against income over the respective performance periods. As
a result of the Merger, the SPIP provided an accelerated payout and additional
amounts to certain key employees resulting in a pre-tax charge of $36.2 million
for year ended December 31, 1996. The Company discontinued the SPIP effective
October 1, 1996 (the Merger date).

<PAGE>

Leveraged Stock Purchase Plan

Prior to the Merger, under the Company's Leveraged Stock Purchase Plan
("LSPP"), 2,000,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase common stock
were reserved for purchase or grant. The terms and provisions of the LSPP
required certain senior management employees to purchase an aggregate of 851,716
shares of common stock in conjunction with the Company's initial public offering
at the offering price of $21.50 per share ("offering price"). The eligible
employees had the option of borrowing from the Company, on a recourse basis,
88.5% to 97.7% of the purchase price of the shares. The recourse loans would
have matured on August 4, 2000, and had a stated interest rate of 6.0%
compounded on an annual basis. The purchased shares were pledged as collateral
for the recourse loans. Sale of these shares was restricted prior to August 4,
1996, and was contingent upon repayment of the loan and certain other
requirements. The recourse loans were shown on the balance sheet as a reduction
of equity.

In addition, under the LSPP, the same senior management employees were
granted premium priced stock options which provided participants with an
opportunity to purchase up to 1,095,040 shares of Company stock at an exercise
price equal to 125% of the offering price ($26.875 per share). The options were
exercisable during the period from August 4, 1996, through August 4, 2003. No
options were canceled during 1996. Options canceled during 1995 and 1994 were
102,852 and 54,895, respectively. Options exercised during 1996 prior to the
Merger were 53,352. Pursuant to the terms of the LSPP, no further purchases of
stock, Company loans or option grants were made under the LSPP subsequent to
December 31, 1993.

1993 Long Term Incentive Plan

Prior to the Merger, under the Company's 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan
("1993 LTIP") the Company granted various stock-based and other awards to
employees of the Company. The number of shares available for grant or purchase
under the 1993 LTIP were 3,500,000 (following approval by the Company's
shareowners of an additional 1,500,000 shares on April 19, 1996). Similar to the
LSPP, eligible employees purchasing stock under the 1993 LTIP had the option of
borrowing from the Company, on a recourse basis, 88.5% to 97.7% of the purchase
price of the shares. The recourse loans, which were due seven years from the
loan date, had stated interest rates ranging from 6.0% to 7.92%, compounded on
an annual basis. The purchased shares were pledged as collateral for the
recourse loans. Sale of these shares was prohibited for a three-year period and
was contingent upon repayment of the loan and certain other requirements. The
recourse loans were shown on the balance sheet as a reduction of equity. Awards
under the 1993 LTIP were made to executives and employees of the Company at the
Company's discretion.

<PAGE>

The following table summarizes the option activity relating to the 1993
LTIP through the merger date:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Under Option Number Price Per Share
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Options outstanding at December 31, 1993 686,303 $21.50
Changes in 1994:
Options exercised (274) $21.50
Options canceled (85,367) $21.50-$26.15
Options granted 502,707 $21.81-$30.63
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options outstanding at December 31, 1994 1,103,369 $21.50-$30.63
Changes in 1995:
Options exercised (16,978) $21.50-$26.15
Options canceled (79,605) $21.50-$26.15
Options granted 345,036 $21.50-$47.03
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options outstanding at December 31, 1995 1,351,822 $21.50-$47.03
Changes in 1996 prior to merger date:
Options exercised (70,195) $21.50-$26.15
Options canceled (42,937) $21.50-$38.63
Options granted 5,206 $38.25-$38.63
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options outstanding at October 1, 1996 1,243,896 $21.50-$47.03
prior to Merger

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options exercisable at December 31, 1996 - -
Options exercisable at December 31, 1995 59,157 $21.50-$26.56
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Upon consummation of the October 1, 1996 Merger Agreement, all option
holders received from Hercules $45 in cash for each option. As a result no
compensation cost was incurred by the Company relating to the cashout of these
options.

As part of the same Merger Agreement, most of the senior management
employees who were participants in the LSPP and 1993 LTIP, were given the
opportunity to exchange all of the Company pre-Merger shares, purchased under
the above mentioned plans, for an equal value of the Company's post-Merger
shares, which was on the basis of 4.5 new shares for each of the Company's
pre-Merger shares. Management employees who effected the exchange had their LSPP
or 1993 LTIP recourse loans extended to the year 2006. The new recourse loans
have a stated interest rate of 7.13%, compounded on an annual basis. The
exchanged shares are pledged as collateral for the recourse loans. Sale of the
underlying shares is restricted and is contingent upon repayment of the loan and
certain other requirements. The recourse loans are shown on the balance sheet as
a reduction of equity.

In addition, the Company had awarded restricted stock under the 1993 LTIP
to certain employees in consideration of services rendered. During 1996, 1995
and 1994, respectively, restricted stock awards of 7,796, 19,967, and 17,801
shares were made to employees under the LTIP.

As of December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 respectively, -0-, 405,106 and
735,936 shares were available for issuance under the 1993 LTIP. The shares were
not subject to stock appreciation right features.

<PAGE>

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In April 1994, the Company's shareowners approved an employee stock
purchase plan effective August 1, 1994. The AT&T Capital Corporation 1994
Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") enabled employees to purchase shares of
AT&T Capital common stock at a discount. The price per share was 90% of the fair
market value of the common stock at the time of its purchase. No compensation
expense was recorded in connection with the ESPP. The maximum aggregate number
of shares of common stock that could have been purchased under the ESPP was
500,000. During 1996, 1995 and 1994, 10,074, 27,965 and 13,484 shares were
purchased by employees at prices ranging from $38.88 to 41.63; $22.05 to $36.00
and $19.02 to $21.83 per share, respectively. As a result of the Merger
agreement, the ESPP was discontinued on June 5, 1996.

1996 Long Term Incentive Plan

Effective on the Merger date, the Company discontinued the LSPP and the
1993 LTIP. A new fixed option plan, the 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan (1996
LTIP), was adopted the same date. Under the 1996 LTIP, certain members of
management who effected an exchange of pre-Merger shares in the Company received
options to purchase new shares of the Company having exercise prices aggregating
$29.25 million. Additional options to purchase the Company's stock having
exercise prices aggregating $9.75 million will also be available for grant to
the same group.

In addition, options to purchase the Company's stock having exercise
prices aggregating $64 million will be available for grant to general members.
These grants will be made annually over a 5 year period. The Board of Directors
may also consider grants over time, commencing after 1997, of options to
purchase the Company's stock with exercise prices aggregating a further $13
million to junior management. Awards under the 1996 LTIP are made to members of
the Company at the Company's discretion.

All stock options granted under the 1996 LTIP shall be at a price no
less than fair market value on the date of the grant, expire after 10 years and
vest over a five year period.

In October, 1996, 5,082,200 options, with an aggregate value of
approximately $51 million, were granted under the 1996 LTIP. A further 50,000
options, with an aggregate value of $0.5 million, were granted to Board members.
The grants were made at an exercise price of $10 each, being equal to the fair
market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. Under the plan,
options having exercise prices aggregating $52 million were available for grant
to December 31, 1996.

Effective January 1, 1996 the Company adopted SFAS No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation". This statement establishes financial accounting
and reporting standards for stock-based employee compensation plans. It allows
companies to choose either 1) a fair value method of valuing stock-based
compensation plans which will affect reported net income, or 2) to continue to
follow the existing accounting rules for stock option accounting but disclose
what the impacts would have been had

<PAGE>

the new standard been adopted. The Company adopted the disclosure alternative
which requires disclosure of the pro forma net income amount assuming the fair
value method was adopted on January 1, 1995. As a result, the adoption of this
standard did not have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation costs based on
the fair value at the date of grant for awards in 1996 and 1995, in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 123, on a pro forma basis, the Company's net income
would have been reduced by $1.3 million and $0.6 million for 1996 and 1995,
respectively.

The effects of applying SFAS 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not
indicative of future amounts. SFAS 123 does not apply to awards prior to 1995,
and additional awards in the future are anticipated.

The weighted average fair values at date of grant for pre-Merger options
granted during 1996 and 1995 were $6.71 and $7.03 per share, respectively. The
minimum value at date of grant for post-Merger options granted in 1996 was $2.61
per share.

For 1996, as a result of the Merger and the related accelerated vesting
of all prior option grants, the fair value was determined as being the
difference between the grant price and the final cash settlement price of $45
per share for all option grants made in 1996. For post-Merger option grants, the
minimum value was estimated using the following assumptions: (a) Risk free
interest rate of 6.2% and (b) Expected life of 5 years.

For 1995, the fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model using the following assumptions: (a) Expected volatility
rate of 24.3%, (b) Risk free interest rate of 7.4%, (c) Expected dividend yield
of 0% and (d) Expected life of 3 years.

Severance Plans

In 1995, the Company's Compensation Committee and Board of Directors
approved broad-based plans that provide for benefits to members upon certain
terminations of employment. Such benefits are calculated using annual base pay
and annual incentive awards as well as other factors. No accrual for these
benefits have been reflected in the consolidated financial statement because the
amount cannot be reasonably estimated.

<PAGE>

14. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Nomura

On October 1, 1996 the Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with
an affiliated company, Nomura International plc (the indirect beneficial owner
of Hercules ("Nomura"). The agreement is for ten years and is subject to a
substantial change in the beneficial ownership of the Company. Under the
agreement Nomura will provide support services to the Company. As part of the
same agreement, the Company incurred a securitization fee of $24 million in
connection with its October 15, 1996 $3.1 billion securitization of lease and
loan receivables (see Note 6). Further, Nomura earned from the Company a $2.0
million fee in connection with its October 25, 1996 issuance to the public of
eight million company-obligated preferred securities of subsidiary. Nomura also
receives a quarterly retainer fee of $0.75 million for certain other services
provided to the Company. Such fees may increase after the first year, but not in
excess of 10% of the previous year's amount.

In connection with the above mentioned $3.1 billion securitization,
Nomura provided an amount equal to 3.5% of the Securitization proceeds as a
credit enhancement.

AT&T/Lucent/NCR

In 1996, rental expense under existing leases with AT&T and affiliates
for the nine months through the Merger date was 3.8 million. Such expenses for
the years ended 1995 and 1994 were $5.5 million and $4.1 million, respectively.

The Company purchases services from AT&T and affiliates, including data
processing, billing and collection, administration and other services. In 1996,
the Company's expenses for such services, for the nine months through the Merger
date were $13.1 million. For the years ended 1995 and 1994, such expenses
amounted to $20.0 million and $20.6 million, respectively.

At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the Company was the lessor to AT&T of
equipment comprising $176.4 million and $268.6 million of capital leases and
$220.5 million and $204.6 million of equipment under operating leases,
respectively. Revenues in 1996 related to these leases through the Merger date
were $67.2 million. For the year ended 1995 and 1994, such revenues were $105.8
million and $108.8 million, respectively.

The Company also had an interest bearing intercompany debt payable to
AT&T and affiliates of $18.3 million at December 31, 1995 and an interest
bearing intercompany note receivable from AT&T and affiliates of $40.1 million
at December 31, 1994. The net interest income and expense associated with
intercompany borrowing were not material in 1996, 1995 or 1994. Additionally,
the Company had interest free loans related to tax agreements from AT&T as more
fully discussed in Note 12.

<PAGE>

The Company is also a party to Operating and License Agreements with AT&T,
pursuant to which AT&T provides the Company with the right to be the preferred
provider of leasing and financing services for AT&T's products on a basis
consistent with past practice (Note 1). The Company and AT&T have also entered
into an Intercompany Agreement whereunder, among other things, the Company
manages and administers, for a fee, certain lease portfolios, including the
Lease Finance Assets of Old Capital and Old Credit which were not transferred to
the Company. In 1996, for the nine months through the Merger date, the Company
recognized service fee revenue of $4.8 million for such services. In 1995 and
1994, fee revenue of $7.6 million and $8.6 million, respectively, were earned
for such services.

In the second quarter of 1996, the Company executed an Operating
Agreement with each of Lucent and NCR, and entered into letter agreements with
Lucent and NCR regarding the applicability to Lucent and NCR of specified
provisions of the License Agreement and the Intercompany Agreement between the
Company and AT&T.

The Company has paid a sales assistance fee ("SAF") to Lucent, which fee
is related to the volume of the Company's Lucent-related business. Under the
terms of its Operating Agreement with the Company, Lucent is prohibited from
accepting a SAF from any other provider of leasing services. In early 1996,
after a period of negotiations, the Company agreed to pay a substantial increase
in the SAF for 1995, both as an absolute amount and as a percentage of volumes
attributable to Lucent. After giving effect to the increase, the SAF paid by the
Company to Lucent for 1995 was approximately double the 1994 fee. The Company
and Lucent recently agreed to a modified formula for calculating the SAF for the
remaining years of the term of Lucent's Operating Agreement (retroactive to
1996). The revised formula is expected to result in aggregate annual SAF which
is approximately double the amounts that would have been paid if the pre-1995
formula had been maintained.

<PAGE>

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Derivative Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company is routinely party to various
derivative financial instruments. These financial instruments are used by the
Company to reduce interest rate and foreign currency exposure, as well as to
meet the financing needs of its customers.

At both December 31, 1996 and 1995, in management's opinion, there was
no significant risk of loss in the event of nonperformance of the counterparties
to derivative contracts. There were no past due amounts, nor were there any
reserves for credit losses on derivatives as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994. Generally, the Company does not require collateral or other security to
support financial instruments with credit risk. The Company has never
experienced a credit related charge-off associated with derivative transactions.

Information is provided below for each significant derivative product type.
The derivatives, with which the Company is involved, are primarily interest rate
swaps, currency swaps, and foreign currency forward exchange contracts.

Interest Rate and Currency Swaps

The Company enters into interest rate and foreign currency swap agreements
with major money center banks and intermediaries located in major financial
centers to reduce interest rate exposure, to more closely match the maturity of
its debt portfolio to that of its asset portfolio and to reduce its exposure to
currency fluctuations. Interest rate swaps also allow the Company to raise funds
at floating rates and effectively swap them into fixed rates that are lower than
those available to the Company if fixed-rate borrowings were made directly.
Foreign currency swaps are primarily used to hedge Canadian dollars.

Under interest rate swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to
exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed-rate and
floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed notional
principal amount. Generic swaps' notional amounts generally do not change for
the life of the contract. Amortizing and accreting swaps' notional amounts
generally change based upon a predetermined amortization or accretion schedule.
Currency swaps generally involve the exchange of both principal and interest
payments in distinct currencies.

<PAGE>

The notional amounts shown below for interest rate swaps represent an
agreed upon amount on which calculations of amounts to be exchanged are based
and for currency swaps also represent the U.S. equivalent of an amount
exchanged. Notional amounts do not represent the Company's exposure. Rather, the
Company's exposure is limited to the current fair value of the contracts with a
positive fair value at the reporting date (see Note 11). A key assumption in the
information below is that rates remain constant at the reporting date levels. To
the extent that rates change, the variable interest rate information will
change.

Activity in interest rate and currency swaps which are all held for
purposes other than trading for 1996 and 1995, is summarized as follows:

Generic Amortizing Generic
Pay Pay Pay Currency
Notional Amounts Fixed Fixed Floating Swaps Total
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1994 $1,571,800 $964,973 $175,000 $221,817 $2,933,590
Additions 124,339 373,435 240,000 151,631 889,405
Maturities/
amortization (350,000) (406,365) (175,000) (108,455) (1,039,820)
Terminations (225,000) (59,400) - - (284,400)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1995 1,121,139 872,643 240,000 264,993 2,498,775
Additions 303,877 370,189 100,000 150,074 924,140
Maturities/
amortization (527,873) (143,364) (240,000) (94,418) (1,005,655)
Terminations (119,800) (540,033) - - (659,833)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1996 $ 777,343 $ 559,435 $100,000 $320,649 $1,757,427
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The schedule of maturities at December 31, 1996 for interest rate and
currency swaps which are all held for purposes other than trading is as follows:

Generic Amortizing Generic
Pay Pay Pay Currency
Fixed Fixed Floating Swaps Total
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total notional
amounts $ 777,343 $ 559,435 $ 100,000 $ 320,649 $1,757,427
Weighted average
pay rate 6.79% 5.99% 5.46% 3.97% 5.95%
Weighted average
receive rate 5.73% 4.97% 5.45% 3.06% 4.99%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

Generic Amortizing Generic
Pay Pay Pay Currency
Fixed Fixed Floating Swaps Total
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>

1997 Maturities $ 341,354 $ 217,484 $ 100,000 $ 128,334 $ 787,172
Weighted average
pay rate 6.03% 6.02% 5.46% 4.89% 5.77%
Weighted average
receive rate 5.73% 4.84% 5.45% 3.80% 5.13%

1998 Maturities $ 230,818 $ 145,285 - $ 112,445 $ 488,548
Weighted average
pay rate 6.86% 5.74% - 4.12% 5.90%
Weighted average
receive rate 5.72% 4.83% - 3.13% 4.86%

1999 Maturities $ 201,680 $ 72,898 - $ 75,536 $ 350,114
Weighted average
pay rate 8.00% 5.74% - 2.04% 6.25%
Weighted average
receive rate 5.75% 4.74% - 1.54% 4.63%

2000 Maturities $ 3,491 $ 60,468 - $ 4,334 $ 68,293
Weighted average
pay rate 6.56% 5.95% - 6.57% 6.02%
Weighted average
receive rate 5.59% 5.28% - 5.75% 5.33%

2001 Maturities - $ 33,186 - $ - $ 33,186
Weighted average
pay rate - 5.92% - - 5.92%
Weighted average
receive rate - 5.75% - - 5.75%

2002-2017 Maturities - $ 30,114 - - $ 30,114
Weighted average
pay rate - 7.75% - - 7.75%
Weighted average
receive rate - 5.75% - - 5.75%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts

The Company enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to
manage foreign exchange risk (primarily British pounds and Canadian dollars).
The U.S. dollar equivalent of such contracts was $907,283 and $658,808 at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The Company enters into these
contracts to hedge the cash flows associated with foreign currency denominated
assets. The term of these contracts is rarely more than three years. The purpose
of the Company's foreign currency hedging activities is to protect the Company
from the risk that the eventual dollar net cash inflows resulting from these
assets will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates.

<PAGE>

Other Commitments and Contingencies

Certain regional office facilities and equipment of the Company are leased
with renewal options of one to five years. Rental expense (including rental
expense to the Former Affiliates of $4,508) for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994 was $21,247, $22,752 and $18,303, respectively. Rental
expense associated with sublease rentals on operating leases for 1996, 1995 and
1994, was $51, $165 and $115, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments at
December 31, 1996, under these operating lease agreements are as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997 $21,095
1998 20,470
1999 18,779
2000 13,232
2001 9,677
2002 and thereafter 21,751
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total $105,004

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The total of minimum rentals to be received in the future under
noncancelable subleases related to operating leases as of December 31, 1996, was
$11,802. The total of minimum rentals to be received in the future under
noncancelable subleases related to capital leases (recorded as debt) as of
December 31, 1996, was $117,850.

As part of its lending activities, the Company has entered into
noncancelable commitments to extend credit to some of its customers. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company had approximately $140,213 of such unused
commitments with a remaining term in excess of one year.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to certain
lawsuits and other claims. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and
the outcomes are not predictable with assurance. Consequently, the ultimate
monetary liability or financial impact with respect to these matters at December
31, 1996 cannot be ascertained. While these matters could impact the operating
results, management believes that after final disposition, any monetary
liability or financial impact to the Company would not be material to the
consolidated financial statements.

16. FOREIGN OPERATIONS

The following data on other geographic areas pertain to operations that are
located outside the U.S. (primarily Europe, Canada, the Asia/ Pacific Region and
Central/South America). Net income (loss) includes certain allocated operating
expenses and interest expense. Revenues between geographic areas are not
material. The increase in the net loss relating to foreign operations for 1996
resulted primarily from the allocation of one-time Merger related costs.

<PAGE>

A summary of the Company's operations by geographic area is presented
below:

For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total Revenues:
United States $ 1,683,499 $1,370,672 $1,250,591
Foreign 268,691 206,363 133,488
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 1,952,190 $1,577,035 $1,384,079
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Income (Loss):
United States $ 180,433 $ 130,587 $ 104,558
Foreign (11,894) (3,032) (4,222)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 168,539 $ 127,555 $ 100,336
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------

At December 31, 1996 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets:
United States $ 6,150,074 $ 7,868,941 $7,148,737
Foreign 1,942,438 1,672,318 873,186
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 8,092,512 $ 9,541,259 $8,021,923
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
--------------------

Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of
the financial statements and all other financial information included in this
report. Management is also responsible for maintaining a system of internal
controls as a fundamental requirement for the operational and financial
integrity of results.

The financial statements, which reflect the consolidated accounts of AT&T
Capital Corporation and its Subsidiaries, and other financial information shown
were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Estimates included in the financial statements were based on judgments of
qualified personnel.

To maintain its system of internal controls, management carefully selects
key personnel and establishes the organizational structure to provide an
appropriate division of responsibility. We believe it is essential to conduct
business affairs in accordance with the highest ethical standards as set forth
in the Company's Guide to Business Conduct. These guidelines and other
informational programs are designed and used to ensure that policies, standards,
and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization. AT&T
Capital's Business Controls Group, monitors compliance with the system of
internal controls by means of an annual plan of internal audits. On an ongoing
basis, the system of internal controls is reviewed, evaluated and revised as
necessary in light of the results of constant management oversight, internal and
independent audits, changes in the Company's business and other conditions.

Management believes that the system of internal controls, taken as a whole,
provides reasonable assurance that (1) financial records are adequate and can be
relied upon to permit the preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, and (2) access to assets occurs only
in accordance with management's authorizations.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors meets periodically with
management, AT&T Capital's Business Controls Group and the independent auditors
to review the manner in which these groups of individuals are performing their
responsibilities and to carry out the Audit Committee's oversight role with
respect to auditing, internal controls and financial reporting matters.
Periodically, the independent auditors meet privately with the Audit Committee.
Both the Business Controls Group and the independent auditors have access to the
Audit Committee and its individual members at any time.

<PAGE>

The financial statements have been audited by Coopers & Lybrand
L.L.P., Independent Auditors. Their audits were conducted in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards and include a consideration of the
internal control structure and substantive tests of transactions. Their report
follows.

Thomas C. Wajnert
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

Edward M. Dwyer
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Risk Management Officer

<PAGE>

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
------------------------------

To the Shareowners of AT&T Capital Corporation:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of AT&T Capital Corporation
and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareowners' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AT&T Capital
Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York
March 6, 1997

<PAGE>

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

On February 12, 1997, the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of
Directors (with the concurrence of the Board of Directors) dismissed Coopers &
Lybrand L.L.P. as the Company's independent public accounts and appointed Arthur
Andersen LLP to serve as the Company's independent public accountants for the
year 1997. Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. will continue to serve as the Company's
independent public accountants for 1996. There have been no disagreements with
independent auditors on any accounting or financial disclosure during the past
two years.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

DIRECTORS

Thomas C. Wajnert. Mr. Wajnert has served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company since July 1993. From April 1993 to July 1993,
Mr. Wajnert was President, Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the
Company. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Wajnert was President and Chief Executive
Officer and a director of Old Capital, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T and a
predecessor of the Company. From 1984 to 1993, Mr. Wajnert was the Chief
Executive Officer of Old Credit, an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T
and a predecessor of both the Company and Old Capital. Mr. Wajnert is also
Chairman of the Equipment Leasing Association of America, Chairman of South
Street Theater Company, and a director of the Wharton Center for Financial
Services and JLG Industries Inc. Age: 53. Date First Elected: April 1993.

John Appleton. Mr. Appleton has been Deputy Managing Director, European
Head of Audit of Nomura International plc ("Nomura International") since June
1996. From 1974 to 1996 he served in a variety of financial management positions
for JP Morgan. Age: 52. Date First Elected: October 1996.

James V. Babcock. Mr. Babcock is an officer and director of Babcock &
Brown Holdings Inc., an international investment-banking firm, which he
co-founded in 1977. Prior to that he briefly practiced corporate and tax law in
San Francisco. Mr. Babcock sits on the Committee of University Resources for
Harvard University and is a member of the San Francisco Opera Medallion Society.
Age: 52. Date First Elected: October 1996.

David F. Banks. Mr. Banks has been Chief Executive Officer of Penna
Holdings plc since 1995. Prior to that he was Finance Director of General
Atlantic Group Ltd. from 1991 to 1995. In addition, Mr. Banks is a director of
NHL Group, GRS Holdings Limited, Gulfstream Inc., K&J Coal Co., Inc., Atkins
Restaurant Co. Ltd., Prideaux & Associates and a Trustee on the Boards of Kenyon
College, the International Center of Photography and the National Corporate Fund
for Dance. Age: 54. Date First Elected: October 1996.

<PAGE>

Max C. Chapman, Jr. Mr. Chapman has been Chief Executive Officer of
Nomura Holding America Inc. since 1992 and Chairman of Nomura Holding America
Inc. and Managing Director of The Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. ("Nomura
Securities") since 1996. Since 1990 he has been a director of Nomura Securities.
He is also a director of O'Sullivan Corporation, the American Stock Exchange and
the Securities Industry Association. Age: 53. Date First Elected: October 1996.

Guy Hands. Mr. Hands has been Managing Director and Head of the
Principal Finance Group of Nomura International since 1994. From 1990 to 1994
Mr. Hands was an Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International's Global
Asset Structuring Group. Age: 37. Date First Elected: October 1996.

Joseph J. Melone. Mr. Melone has been President and Chief Executive
Officer of The Equitable Companies, Incorporated ("Equitable") since February
1996 and the Chairman of The Equitable Life Assurance Society, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Equitable since 1990. From 1990 to 1996 he was President and Chief
Operating Officer of Equitable. From 1984 to 1990, Mr. Melone was President of
The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Mr. Melone is also a director of
Equitable, The Equitable Life Assurance Society, Alliance Capital Management
Corporation, Foster Wheeler Corporation, Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. and
the American Council of Life Insurance. Age: 65. Date First Elected: June 1993.

Brooks Walker, Jr. Mr. Walker has been a general partner of Walker
Investors, a venture capital firm, since 1978. From 1968 to 1987, Mr. Walker was
the Chairman and President of United States Leasing International, Inc. Mr.
Walker is also a director of Gap, Inc. and Pope & Talbot, Inc. Age: 68. Date
First Elected: June 1993.

Hiromi Yamaji. Mr. Yamaji has been Managing Director, Head of Investment
Banking Division of Nomura International since 1994. From 1988 to 1990 he was
Vice President of WP and Co., Inc. and from 1990 to 1994 he was General Manager
of Nomura Wasserstein Perella & Co., Ltd. Mr. Yamaji is also a director of Korea
Bond Fund plc. Age: 41. Date First Elected: October 1996.

The Board of Directors and Committees of the Board

The business of the Company is managed under the direction of the Board of
Directors. Because of the number of matters requiring Board consideration, and
to make the most effective use of individual Board members' capabilities, the
Board of Directors has established three Committees to devote attention to
specific subjects and to assist it in the discharge of its responsibilities. The
functions of these Committees and their current members are described below.

The Executive Committee possesses the powers of the Board to manage and direct
the business of the Company during the interval between Board meetings, except
as limited by Delaware law and except for those matters assigned to the other
Board Committees. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Wajnert
(Chairman), Babcock, Chapman, Hands, and Yamaji.

<PAGE>

The Compensation Committee recommends to the Board the compensation arrangements
for, and grants of awards and incentive payments to, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer (the "CEO"); approves compensation arrangements for, and
grants of awards and incentive payments to, certain other of the Company's
senior officers and management; considers matters related to management
development and succession; administers certain of the Company's compensation
plans; periodically reviews the competitive position of the Company's total
compensation relative to the Company's peers and competitors; approves aggregate
award of stock options or other equity awards to be granted to the Company's
members; approves certain employment agreements involving the Company's members;
and approves certain benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries. The
members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Hands (Chairman), Chapman,
Melone and Yamaji.

The Audit Committee reviews the financial reporting standards and practices of
the Company and the Company's internal financial controls to monitor the
independence of the Company's public auditors, the integrity of management and
the adequacy of financial disclosures to stockholders. To further the foregoing,
the Audit Committee recommends the firm to be appointed as independent auditors
to audit the Company's financial statements; reviews the scope and results of
the audit with the independent auditors; reviews with management and the
independent auditors the Company's interim and year-end operating results; and
considers the adequacy of the internal accounting and auditing procedures of the
Company. The Company's internal auditors and the independent auditors each have
the opportunity to meet alone with the Audit Committee and have unrestricted
access to the Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs.
Appleton (Chairman), Banks and Walker.

Compensation of Directors

Directors who do not receive compensation as an employee of the Company or as an
employee, director or advisor of any of its affiliates (collectively,
"Non-Employee Directors") are paid an annual retainer fee of $18,500 and a fee
of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board or any Board Committee that such
director attends ($750 in the case of a telephonic meeting and $500 for each
unanimous consent). In addition, on the date of their election to the Board,
Non-Employee Directors have received a one-time option to purchase shares of the
Company's Common Stock having a fair market value equal to $250,000 at a
purchase price per share equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on
the date of the grant. Such options vest (on a pro rata basis - 20% per year)
five years after the date of grant and expire 10 years after the grant date
(subject to certain exceptions provided in the Stock Option Agreement for
Non-Employee Directors). All Non-Employee Directors are reimbursed for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings.

On an annual basis on the day after the Company's annual stockholders' meeting
(or stockholders' consent in lieu of an annual meeting), Non-Employee Directors
receive an option to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock having a fair
market value equal to $50,000 at a purchase price per share equal to the fair
market value of the Common Stock on the date of the grant. Such options vest on
the day before the Company's annual stockholders' meeting next following the
date of the grant and would generally be forfeited to the Company if the
Non-Employee Director ceases to be a member of the Board prior to such date.

<PAGE>

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive officers of the Company serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. No executive officer of the Company, other than Mr. Wajnert has a
written employment or noncompetition agreement with the Company (see page 97 for
additional information regarding "Employment, Change in Control and Termination
Arrangements). The executive officers of the Company comprise the Corporate
Leadership Team consisting of the following seven officers: Messrs. Wajnert,
Dwyer, Ingato, Sadeghi and Van Sickle and Ms. McAuley and Ms. Morey. Information
regarding Thomas C. Wajnert, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, is set forth above under "Directors."

Edward M. Dwyer, 40, has served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company since 1995. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Dwyer was
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. From 1993 to 1994,
Mr. Dwyer was Vice President and Treasurer of the Company. From 1991 to 1993,
he was Vice President and Treasurer of Old Capital. From 1990 to 1991, Mr. Dwyer
was Chief Financial Officer of Old Capital's Capital Markets Division.

Robert J. Ingato, 36, has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary of the Company since October 1996. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Ingato
served as Vice President, Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of
the Company. From 1988 to 1992, Mr. Ingato held various positions in the
Company's legal department.

Sara R. McAuley, 41, has served as Senior Vice President - Corporate
Resources Officer of the Company since October 1996. From 1994 to 1996, she was
Vice President, Human Resources of the Company. From 1982 to 1994, Ms. McAuley
held a variety of positions with Premark International.

Ruth A. Morey, 53, has served as Senior Vice President - Chief Information
Officer since October 1996. From 1993 to 1996, Ms. Morey served as Senior Vice
President and Corporate Resources Officer of the Company. From 1990 to 1993, Ms.
Morey served as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Old
Capital. From 1987 to 1991, Ms. Morey was Vice President of Human Resources of
Old Credit.

Mani A. Sadeghi, 33, has served as Group President of the Company since
October 1996. From 1994 to 1996, he was Vice President - Corporate Development
of the Company. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Sadeghi was Director, Strategic Planning
& Business Development at General Electric Capital Corporation.

Charles D. Van Sickle, 54, has served as Group President of the Company
since 1993. From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Van Sickle was Group President of Old Capital
and from 1992 to 1993, he was Vice Chairman of Old Capital's Capital Markets
Division. From 1991 to 1992 Mr. Van Sickle was President and Chief Operating
Officer of Old Capital's Capital Markets Division. From 1988 to 1991, Mr. Van
Sickle was a Senior Vice President of Old Credit's Capital Markets Division.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid during the past three
fiscal years to the Company's CEO, the four most highly compensated

<PAGE>

executive officers serving as such on December 31, 1996 (other than the CEO) and
two former executive officers who would have been among the four most highly
compensated executive officers had they not ceased serving as executive officers
in October 1996.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Long-Term Compensation
----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
Awards Payouts
---------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restricted
Other Annual Stock Securities LTIP All Other
Name and Principal Compensation Award Underlying Payouts Compensation
Position Year Salary($) Bonus($) ($) (s)($)(1) Options(#) ($) ($)(2)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Thomas C. Wajnert,
Chairman of the Board
& Chief Executive
Officer 1996 553,625 677,808 6,889 0 598,900 796,936 10,627,954
1995 502,079 677,808 11,718 0 60,000 218,228 103,935
1994 452,838 441,755 23,207 0 50,000 209,416 81,888
Charles D. Van Sickle,
Group President 1996 305,750 346,900 6,889 0 195,000 445,952 4,424,479
1995 284,344 346,900 7,594 0 10,500 0 46,684
1994 250,000 205,449 6,086 0 24,341 0 41,588
Ruth A. Morey, Senior
Vice President - Chief
Information Officer 1996 247,250 266,000 7,109 0 135,000 354,038 3,170,704
1995 231,798 266,568 6,437 0 7,500 0 40,617
1994 206,000 169,287 4,798 0 12,551 0 33,815
Edward M. Dwyer,
Senior
Vice President and
Chief Financial
Officer 1996 229,250 262,802 2,721 0 195,000 197,334 3,396,013
1995 196,122 262,802 3,100 0 7,500 0 43,704
1994 157,997 127,117 0 0 16,112 0 15,922
Mani A. Sadeghi, Group
President 1996 206,917 178,530 3,100 0 145,000 0 1,483,886
1995 182,546 178,530 3,100 0 4,000 0 17,968
1994 53,218 100,000 0 0 21,703 0 40,536
Irving H. Rothman,
Former Group President 1996 235,833 0 4,822 0 0 445,952 6,124,796
1995 291,768 376,381 4,960 0 10,500 192,00 49,458
1994 271,666 217,360 1,447 0 28,725 0 47,832
G. Daniel McCarthy,
Former Senior Vice
President, General
Counsel, Secretary and
Chief Risk Management
Officer 1996 185,750 0 3,238 0 0 354,038 4,605,941
1995 233,414 337,283 3,119 0 7,500 0 41,392
1994 217,333 167,343 5,154 0 13,194 0 36,745
</TABLE>

- ---------
(1) Messrs. Wajnert, Van Sickle, Dwyer, Sadeghi and Ms. Morey each
acquired newly issued restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock
pursuant to the exchange offer made in connection with the Merger ("Exchange
Offer"); Messrs. Rothman and McCarthy did not exchange their shares. The
exchanged shares were purchased under the Company's Leveraged Stock Purchase
Plan ("LSPP") in 1993. Pursuant to the Exchange Offer, the

<PAGE>

named executive officers received 4.5 shares of Common Stock for each of the
exchanged shares held prior to the Merger.

(2) Includes in 1996 (i) payments reflecting the difference between the
option price and the exercise price on shares of the Company's Common Stock
held by the named executive officers in connection with the Merger-related
cash-out of such stock options ("Option Cash-Out") in the following amounts:
Mr. Wajnert, $5,849,255; Mr. Van Sickle, $1,979,641; Ms. Morey, $1,362,260;
Mr. Dwyer, $1,068,520; Mr. Sadeghi, $408,263; Mr. Rothman, $2,218,028; and
Mr. McCarthy, $1,457,574; (ii) the remaining four payments, accelerated as a
result of the Merger, made pursuant to the Company's Share Performance
Incentive Plan ("SPIP") in the following amounts: Mr. Wajnert, $3,609,639;
Mr. Van Sickle, $2,018,215; Ms. Morey, $1,602,245; Mr. Dwyer, $1,602,245;
Mr. Sadeghi, $631,443; Mr. Rothman, $2,018,215; and Mr. McCarthy,
$1,602,245; (iii) severance and related payments under the Company's
Leadership Severance Plan ("LSP") in connection with termination of
employment on October 2, 1996 to the following named executive officers: Mr.
Rothman, $1,468,651; and Mr. McCarthy, $1,156,876; (iv) qualifying
termination payments under the Company's Senior Executive Annual Incentive
Plan ("SEAIP") to the following named executive officers: Mr. Rothman,
$365,656; and Mr. McCarthy, $327,672; (v) Company contributions to the
Company's Retirement and Savings Plan and related non-qualified plans in the
following amounts: Mr. Wajnert, $152,041; Mr. Van Sickle, $80,623; Ms.
Morey, $66,199; Mr. Dwyer, $60,050; Mr. Sadeghi, $43,710; Mr. Rothman,
$54,246; and Mr. McCarthy, $61,574; (vi) the dollar value of the benefit of
premiums paid for split-dollar life insurance policies (Mr. Wajnert,
$17,019); (vii) a sign-on bonus paid to Mr. Wajnert in the amount of
$722,192; (viii) payments made to the following named executive officers in
connection with such officers' execution of a retention or related agreement
with the Company for continued employment with the Company: Mr. Dwyer,
$165,198 and Mr. Sadeghi, $150,470; (ix) payments made to the following
named executive officers in connection with such officers' execution of a
waiver agreement with the Company to waive certain of such officers' rights
under the LSP: Mr. Wajnert, $277,808; Mr. Van Sickle, $346,000; Ms. Morey,
$140,000; Mr. Dwyer, $500,000; and Mr. Sadeghi, $250,000.

<PAGE>

The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company's Common
Stock subject to stock options granted to the individuals listed in the Summary
Compensation Table during 1996, together with related information.

OPTION GRANTS IN 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential Realizable
Number of Value at Assumed
Securities Percent of Annual Rate of Stock
Underlying Total Options Exercise Price Appreciation
Options Granted to or Base for Option Term(3)
Granted Employees in Price Expiration -------------------
Name (#)(1) Fiscal Year(2) ($/Sh) Date 5%($) 10%($)
- ------ --------- -------------- ------ ---- ----- ------
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Thomas C. Wajnert..
598,900 11.831% $ 10.00 10/1/07 $3,766,450 $9,544,924
Charles D. Van Sickle
155,000 3.062% 10.00 10/1/07 974,787 2,470,301
40,000 0.790% 10.00 10/17/07 251,558 637,497
Ruth A. Morey.......
129,000 2.548% 10.00 10/1/07 811,274 2,055,928
6,000 0.119% 10.00 10/17/07 37,734 95,625
Edward M. Dwyer
108,000 2.133% 10.00 10/1/07 679,206 1,721,242
87,000 1.719% 10.00 10/17/07 547,138 1,386,556
Mani A. Sadeghi
56,000 1.106% 10.00 10/1/07 352,181 892,496
89,000 1.758% 10.00 10/17/07 559,716 1,418,431
Irving H. Rothman..
0 0.000% N/A N/A 0 0
G. Daniel McCarthy..
0 0.000% N/A N/A 0 0
</TABLE>

- ---------

(1) Options vest (on a pro rata basis - 20% per year) five years after the date
of grant.

(2) The indicated percentages represent the aggregate options to purchase the
Company's Common Stock granted to the named executive officers expressed as a
percentage of the aggregate options to purchase the Company's Common Stock
granted to all members of the Company and its subsidiaries in 1996.

(3) The 5 and 10 percent growth rates are set forth in accordance with the rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Because the exercise price for such
options equals the market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant, no
gain to the executives is possible without an increase in the stock price, which
increase would benefit the stockholders as a whole. Zero growth in the stock
price will result in zero realizable value to the executive. The 5 and 10
percent growth rates are intended for illustration only and are not intended to
be predictive of future growth, if any; the actual value, if any, that may be
realized by any executive will depend on the value of the Common Stock on the
date of exercise. At present, there is no public market for the Common Stock.

<PAGE>

The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company's Common
Stock subject to stock options exercised by the individuals listed in the
Summary Compensation Table during 1996, together with related information, and
the value of unexercised options.

AGGREGATED COMPANY OPTION EXERCISES IN 1996
AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Unexercised in-the-Money
Options at Options at
Fiscal Fiscal
Year-End(#) Year-End($)(2)
Shares ---------------------------------------------
Acquired on Exercisable/ Exercisable/
Name Exercise(#)(1) Value Realized($) Unexercisable Unexercisable
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Thomas C. Wajnert......0 0 0/598,900 $ 0/3,593,400
Charles D. Van Sickle..0 0 0/195,000 0/1,170,000
Ruth A. Morey..........0 0 0/135,000 0/810,000
Edward M. Dwyer........0 0 0/195,000 0/1,170,000
Mani A. Sadeghi........0 0 0/145,000 0/870,000
Irving H. Rothman......0 0 0/0 0/0
G. Daniel McCarthy.....0 0 0/0 0/0
</TABLE>

(1) See Footnote 2, clause (i) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 94.

(2) In accordance with the terms of the applicable stock option agreements
pursuant to which the options in the table were granted, a professional
appraisal firm determined that the fair market value of the Common Stock as
of December 31, 1996 was $16.00 per share (on a fully diluted basis). Such
appraisal assumed, as required by the stock option agreements, that the
value would not be affected by any discount attributable to the illiquidity
of the Common Stock or the fact that any shares of Common Stock may
constitute a majority interest in the Company or any premium attributable to
any special rights of any stockholder with respect to its shares of Common
Stock. The valuation analysis conducted by the valuation firm was based
upon a number of other assumptions with respect to industry performance,
general business, financial, market and economic conditions and other
matters, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. It did not
purport to be an appraisal or to reflect the prices at which the Company
might actually be sold or the prices at which any securities may trade at
the present time or at any time in the future.

Defined Benefit Plan Retirement Benefits

The Company has two nonqualified pension plans, effective January 1, 1994, in
which the named executive officers (except Mr. Sadeghi and Ms. McAuley)
participate: the AT&T Capital Corporation Executive Benefit Plan ("EBP") and the
AT&T Capital Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP").

Under the EBP, a participant's benefit equals 40% of "Final Pay" (as defined
in the EBP), less benefits provided under all other qualified and non-qualified
sources from both AT&T and the Company (including the SERP described below,
subject to reduction if benefits commence before age 60).

<PAGE>

Under the SERP, certain executives will be provided with supplemental
retirement benefits to ease the transition from coverage under the AT&TMPP
(as such term is defined below) to coverage under the Company's new defined
contribution plan.

The EBP and the SERP are considered "unfunded" plans under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended; however, the Company has
made a contribution to a rabbi trust to satisfy its obligations under the EBP.

Through December 31, 1993, Messrs. Wajnert, Van Sickle and Dwyer, and Ms.
Morey, participated in the AT&T Management Pension Plan ("AT&TMPP"), a
non-contributory pension plan which covers all management employees, including
executive officers, of AT&T and certain of its affiliates.

Messrs. Rothman, Van Sickle and Wajnert are also covered by a supplemental
AT&T Mid-Career Pension Plan. The plan provides additional pension credits equal
to the difference between age 35 and their maximum possible years of service
attainable at age 65, but not to exceed actual net credited service, at
approximately one-half the rate of the AT&TMPP.

Messrs. Wajnert, Van Sickle and Dwyer and Ms. Morey ceased to participate in
the above-mentioned pension plans effective January 1, 1994. Their accrued
annual pension amounts under these plans are $105,660, $45,799, $26,434 and
$21,003, respectively. Pensions will be payable to each of them when each
reaches age 65.

Employment, Change in Control and Termination Arrangements

Mr. Wajnert's Employment Agreement with the Company dated September 30, 1996
provides for his employment through December 31, 1999 at a base salary of
$625,000 per year (subject to increases as may be approved by the Board from
time to time), and an annual incentive bonus for 1996 equal to $677,808 and
thereafter a target annual incentive from 1997-1999 of 60% of base salary. The
agreement also provides for the grant in 1996 of options to purchase 598,900
shares of Company stock. Of these options, options to purchase (a) 498,900
shares vest on a pro rata basis, 20% per year, five years from the date of
grant, however, the vesting thereof may be accelerated on a pro rata basis to
33.33% per year over three years if Mr. Wajnert attains certain performance
objectives established by the Board; and (b) 100,000 shares vest 50% each year
in the fourth and fifth years from the date of grant (see Option Grants in 1996
table on page 95).

Upon his termination of employment, under the severance provisions of Mr.
Wajnert's employment agreement, he generally would be entitled to payments equal
to the sum of (a) the product of (i) 300%, (ii) the percentage of the remaining
term of the agreement, and (iii) "Final Annual Pay" (as defined in Mr. Wajnert's
Employment Agreement); and (b) 110% of Mr. Wajnert's bonus for the year of
termination.

In October 1996, the employment of Messrs. Rothman and McCarthy terminated as
a result of a qualifying termination pursuant to the LSP. As a result, Messrs.
Rothman and McCarthy received severance related payments and benefits, including
payments due to them under the SEAIP. The aggregate

<PAGE>

amount of such payments is set forth in Footnote 2, clauses (iii) and (iv) to
the Summary Compensation Table on page 94.

The SEAIP, LTIP and the EBP contain certain provisions which become operative
upon a "Sale of Control" (as defined in such plans). The Company has also
adopted a 1996 Leadership Severance Plan ("1996 LSP") in which the named
executives participate, pursuant to which benefits may become payable on certain
terminations of employment prior to and following a change in control (as
defined in the 1996 LSP).

In the event of a "Qualifying Termination" under the SEAIP, each participant
in the SEAIP becomes vested with the right to receive a cash award for that year
equal to the higher of (i) 110% of that participants' target incentive, if any,
and (ii) such participants' cash award for the immediately preceding year.

In the event of a "Qualifying Termination" of the employment of a participant
in the LTIP without "cause" or the resignation of a participant for a "Good
Reason" whether or not such termination or resignation follows a "Change in
Control", options that are vested are frozen at their intrinsic value and expire
60 days after they become exercisable.

The EBP provides for 100% accelerated vesting for the named executives upon
the occurrence of (i) a change in control of the Company or (ii) the
participant's termination of employment (other than a "Nonqualifying
Termination" as defined in the EBP).

Under the 1996 LSP, in the event of (x) a termination of employment as a result
of a reduction in force, change in operations, facility relocation or closing or
other job elimination or (y) a "Qualifying Termination" of employment prior to
the second anniversary of the Closing Date or "Other Eligible Termination" in
connection with a Change in Control (a "RIF Termination"), each of the named
executives would receive severance benefits equal to (i) the greater of (A) 2
weeks compensation for each full year of continuous service and (B) 200% of
Final Annual Pay and (ii) 135% of the premium which would be required to
maintain "COBRA" continuing medical and dental coverage for 24 months (the
"continuation period"). If the named executive's employment is terminated by the
Company (other than as a result of a RIF Termination, cause, disability or
retirement prior to the second anniversary of the Closing Date or "Other
Eligible Termination"), the executive would receive severance benefits equal to
(i) the greater of (A) one weeks compensation for each full year of continuous
service and (B) 150% of Final Annual Pay and (ii) 135% of an 18-month
continuation period "COBRA" premium.

Additional benefits upon severance include continued basic life insurance and
supplemental life insurance (at the executive's cost) for the relevant
continuation period. By executing a release of claims, the executive may receive
an enhanced severance payment equal to 20% of a severance payment. If any
payments from the Company under the 1996 LSP or otherwise, would be subject to
an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then the named
executive would be entitled to receive an additional payment so that he would
retain an amount of such payments as if the excise tax had not applied.

<PAGE>

Indebtedness of Management

Each of the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table is indebted to
the Company pursuant to notes originally executed under the LSPP or the 1993
Long Term Incentive Plan ("1993 LTIP"). Under the LSPP or 1993 LTIP, each of the
named executive officers, except Mr. Sadeghi, was required to purchase shares of
Common Stock with an aggregate purchase price approximately equal to a specified
multiple of such executive's base salary.

Between 88.5% and 97.7% of the purchase price for the shares of Common Stock
purchased by a participant (the "Purchased Shares") was paid for out of the
proceeds of a seven-year full recourse loan (a "Loan") made by the Company to
such participant, with the balance of such purchase price being paid by such
participant in cash. Interest accrued on each Loan at the rate of 6% per annum
compounded annually (or, if higher, the safe harbor rate under applicable tax
laws as of the date of purchase of the Purchased Shares).

The Purchased Shares of a participant are pledged to the Company to secure
repayment of the Loan to such participant.

Pursuant to the Exchange Offer, previously purchased shares were exchanged for
new shares resulting in ownership of the surviving corporation (except for
Messrs. Rothman and McCarthy who elected to sell their shares). At the same
time, the loans originally made in connection with the LSPP or the 1993 LTIP
were extended to the year 2006 and were amended to defer the payment of interest
until the principal becomes due and payable.

The following table sets forth for each executive officer named in the Summary
Compensation Table the largest aggregate amount of his or her indebtedness to
the Company (all of which is related to the Loans referred to above) outstanding
at any time during 1996 (the "Highest 1996 Loan Balance") and the amount of the
indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 1996 (the "Current Balance"):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Current Balance Highest 1996
Name at December 31, 1996 Loan Balance
<S> <C> <C>
Thomas C. Wajnert .............................. $2,894,752 $2,894,752
Chairman of the Board & Chief
Executive Officer
Charles D. Van Sickle .......................... 1,094,450 1,094,450
Group President
Ruth A. Morey .................................. 905,577 905,577
Senior Vice President -
Chief Information Officer
Edward M. Dwyer ................................ 756,533 756,533
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Mani A. Sadeghi ................................ 421,624 421,624
Group President
Irving H. Rothman .............................. 0 1,219,065
Former Group President
G. Daniel McCarthy ............................. 0 975,239
Former Senior Vice President,
General Counsel, Secretary
and Chief Risk Management Officer
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

The following tables set forth information with respect to beneficial ownership
of the Company's Common Stock as of January 1, 1997 by each director, by each
nominee for director, by each of the five executive and two former executive
officers of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table under Item 11
above, by all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and by
each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
Common Stock:

(a) Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners of More
than 5% of the Company's Voting Securities

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount of
and Nature
of
Name and Address of Beneficial Percent
Title of Class Beneficial Owner Ownership of Class
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock Hercules Holdings (Cayman) Limited 87,184,089 96.5%
c/o Maples & Calder
P.O. Box 309
Ugland House
South Church Street
Grand Cayman
Cayman Islands
British West Indies
</TABLE>

100

<PAGE>

(b) Security Ownership of Directors, Nominees for Director and Management
I. Equity Securities of AT&T Capital Corporation

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount of
and Nature
of Beneficial Percent
Title of Class Name of Beneficial Owner Ownership of Class
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock John Appleton........................ 0 (1)
Common Stock James V. Babcock..................... 0 (1)
Common Stock David F. Banks ..................... 0 (1)
Common Stock Max C. Chapman, Jr. ................. 0 (1)
Common Stock Edward M. Dwyer...................... 146,700(2) (1)
Common Stock Guy Hands............................ 0 (1)
Common Stock G. Daniel McCarthy................... 0 (1)
Common Stock Joseph J. Melone..................... 0 (1)
Common Stock Ruth A. Morey........................ 175,185(2) (1)
Common Stock Irving H. Rothman.................... 0 (1)
Common Stock Mani A. Sadeghi. .................... 74,214(2) (1)
Common Stock Charles D. Van Sickle................ 211,919(2) (1)
Common Stock Thomas C. Wajnert.................... 560,511(2) (1)
Common Stock Brooks Walker, Jr.................... 0 (1)
Common Stock Hiromi Yamaji........................ 0 (1)
All directors and executive officers (17 persons) as a
group, including the above................................. 1,271,426
</TABLE>

- ---------

(1) Such ownership interests for each individual director and named executive
officer do not exceed 1 percent of the outstanding Common Stock and for all
directors and executive officers as a group the aggregate ownership interest
is 1.4% of the outstanding Common Stock.

(2) No options are currently exercisable within 60 days pursuant to stock
options awarded under employee incentive compensation plans.

101

<PAGE>

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

The information is set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation".

PART IV

Item 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

(a) Documents filed as a part of the report:

(1) Financial Statements: Page

Consolidated Balance Sheets 46
Consolidated Statements of Income 47
Consolidated Statements of Changes
in Shareowners' Equity 48
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 49
Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements 52
Report of Management 86
Report of Independent Auditors 88

(2) Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule VIII - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Financial statement schedules other than the one listed above
are omitted because the required information is included in the
financial statements or notes thereto or because of the absence
of conditions under which they are required.

Report of Independent Auditors

(3) Exhibits:

Exhibit
Number

2 Certificate of Merger, filed October 1, 1996

3(a). Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the registrant's
Current Report on Form 8-K [No. 1-11237] dated October 1, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

3(b). Amended and Restated By-laws of the registrant is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the registrant's
Current Report on Form 8-K [No. 1-11237] dated October 1, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

102

<PAGE>

4(a). Indenture dated as of July 1, 1993 between the registrant and
Chemical Bank, Trustee (the "Indenture") is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4A of the registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-3 [No. 33-49671] filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

4(b). First Indenture Supplement dated as of June 24, 1994, to the
Indenture is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4A-2 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 [No.33-54359]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

4(c). Instruments other than described above in 4(a) and 4(b) that
define the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant
and all of its consolidated subsidiaries, are omitted pursuant to
Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. The registrant hereby
agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities
and Exchange Commission upon request.

4(d). Second Indenture Supplement dated as of January 10, 1997, to the
Indenture incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4A-3 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 [No. 33- 18367]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(a). Operating Agreement between the registrant and AT&T dated as of
June 25, 1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(b). First Amendment to Operating Agreement between the registrant
and AT&T dated January 5, 1995 is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(b) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
[No. 1-11237] for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(c). Intercompany Agreement between the registrant and AT&T dated as of
June 25, 1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(d). License Agreement between the registrant and AT&T dated as of June
25, 1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33- 49605]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(e). Registration Rights Agreement between the registrant and AT&T
dated as of June 25, 1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 of the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No.
33-49605] filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(f). Tax Agreements between the registrant and AT&T dated as of June
25, 1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

103

<PAGE>

10(g). AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605] filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(h). AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Leveraged Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605] filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(i). Form of Stock Purchase Agreement and related exhibits under the
1993 Leveraged Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 of the registrant's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 [No. 33-49605] filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

10(j). AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Share Performance Incentive Plan is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605] filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(k). Amendment Number 1 to the 1993 Share Performance Incentive
Plan dated November 14, 1995 is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(o) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
[No. 1-11237] for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission..

10(l). Restructuring Agreement dated as of March 29, 1993, among the
Registrant, Old Capital, Old Credit and AT&T is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605] filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(m). AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Employee Compensation Adjustment
Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(n). AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Financial Counseling Plan is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No.33-49605] filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(o). AT&T Capital Corporation 1995 Annual Incentive Plan is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) of the registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237] for the year ended
December 31, 1994, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

10(p). AT&T Capital Corporation 1995 Senior Executive Annual Incentive
Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the registrant's
definitive Proxy Statement dated March 20, 1995 issued in
connection with the 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

104

<PAGE>

10(q). AT&T Capital Corporation Executive Benefit Plan as amended
and restated effective as of December 4, 1995 is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(y) of the registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K [No. 1-11237] for the year ended December 31, 1995,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(r). AT&T Capital Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan effective January 1, 1994 is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(z) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
[No. 1-11237] for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(s). AT&T Capital Corporation Compensation Limit Excess Plan
effective January 1, 1995 is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(aa) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
[No. 1-11237] for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(t). Amendment to the AT&T Capital Corporation Compensation
Limit Excess Plan dated October 1, 1995 is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(ab) of the registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K [No.1-11237] for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(u). AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership Severance Plan effective
October 2, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ac)of
the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237] for the
year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(v). The Agreement between the registrant and AT&T dated January 5,
1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ad) of the
registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237] for the
year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(w). Lucent Technologies Operating Agreement dated as of April 2, 1996
between the Company and Lucent Technologies Inc is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(x). NCR Operating Agreement dated as of May 6, 1996 between the
Company and NCR Corporation is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(b) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
[1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

105

<PAGE>

10(y). Letter Agreement dated April 2, 1996 between Lucent
Technologies Inc. and the Company regarding the
applicability of the Intercompany Agreement to Lucent
Technologies Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(c). of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
[1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(z). Letter Agreement dated April 2, 1996 between Lucent
Technologies Inc. and the Company regarding the License to Use
Lucent Name and Mark is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d)
of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for
the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(aa).Letter Agreement dated April 18, 1996 between NCR Corporation
and the Company regarding the applicability of the Intercompany
Agreement to NCR Corporation is incorporated is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(e) of the registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(ab).Letter Agreement dated April 18, 1996 between NCR
Corporation and the Company regarding the License to
Use NCR Name and Mark is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(f) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
[1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(ac).AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan, as
amended is incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy
Statement dated March 19, 1996.

10(ad).Amendment to the AT&T Capital Corporation 1995 Senior
Executive Annual Incentive Plan dated October 1, 1996 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of the registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended
March 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(ae).Amendment to the AT&T Capital Corporation Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan dated October 1, 1996 is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(b) of the registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(af).Amendment to Share Performance Award under the AT&T Capital
Corporation 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan dated October 1, 1996 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of the registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

106

<PAGE>

10(ag).Amendment Number 2 to the AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Share
Performance Incentive Plan dated October 1, 1996 is incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10(d) of the registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30,
1996, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

10(ah).1996 AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership Severance Plan
effective October 1, 1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(e) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237]
for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(ai).Employment Agreement between Antigua Acquisition Corporation
and Thomas C. Wajnert dated September 30, 1996 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) of the registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

10(aj).AT&T Capital Corporation Stock Option Agreement dated October 1,
1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of the
registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(ak).AT&T Capital Corporation 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan dated October
1, 1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) of
the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

10(al).Credit Agreement dated as of September 16, 1996, among AT&T Capital
Corporation, the Banks Listed Herein and Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company of New York, as Agent (5-year term) is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(i)of the registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30,
1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(am).Credit Agreement dated as of September 16, 1996, among AT&T
Capital Corporation, the Banks Listed Herein and Morgan Guaranty
Trust Company of New York, as Agent (364-day term) is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) of the registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

10(an).Form of first Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger among AT&T
Capital Corporation, AT&T Corp., Hercules Limited and
Antigua Acquisition Corporation dated August 20, 1996 is
incorporated by reference to exhibit 10 of the registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K [No. 1-11237], filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

107

<PAGE>

10(ao).Amendment No. 2 to the 1996 AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership
Severance Plan effective January 17, 1997.

16 Letter on change in certifying accountants - to the Securities
and Exchange Commission from Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., dated
February 12, 1997 is incorporated by reference to exhibit 16 of
the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K [No. 1-11237], filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

12. Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

21. Subsidiaries of the registrant.

23. Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

24(a). Powers of Attorney executed by officers and directors who signed
this report.

24(b). Certificate of Corporate Resolution.

27. Financial Data Schedule

(b) Current Reports on Form 8-K:
Reports on Form 8-K dated April 12, 1996, April 30, 1996,
June 5, 1996, August 19, 1996, and November 1, 1996 were filed
pursuant to Item 5 (Other Events). Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 1, 1996 was filed pursuant to Item 1 (Change in Control of
Registrant).

108

<PAGE>

SCHEDULE II

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
(Dollars In Thousands)

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other
Balance at Charge-offs, Additions/ Balance
Beginning Net of (Deductions) at End
of Period Additions Recoveries (a) of Period
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
Allowance for
Credit Losses:
U.S.:
Lease Financing(1)$144,666 $ 69,931 $ 68,378 $ (64,096) $ 82,123
Finance
Receivables(2) 52,607 27,916 13,087 (16,586) 50,850
Foreign 25,947 15,758 4,847 (845) 36,013
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $223,220 $113,605 $ 86,312 $ (81,527) $ 168,986
==========================================================================
1995
Allowance for
Credit Losses:
U.S.:
Lease Financing(1)$113,735 $ 66,505 $ 34,890 $ (684) $144,666
Finance
Receivables(2) 46,637 15,167 9,043 (154) 52,607
Foreign 16,056 4,542 2,837 8,186 25,947
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $176,428 $ 86,214 $ 46,770 $ 7,348 $223,220
==========================================================================
1994
Allowance for
Credit Losses:
U.S.:
Lease Financing(1)$ 95,196 $ 62,447 $ 32,919 $(10,989) $113,735
Finance
Receivables(2) 56,974 13,488 21,347 (2,478) 46,637
Foreign 7,649 4,953 1,279 4,733 16,056
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $159,819 $ 80,888 $ 55,545 $ (8,734) $176,428
===========================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Shown on the balance sheet as a deduction from applicable finance assets,
primarily capital leases.

(2) Shown on the balance sheet as a deduction from finance receivables.
(a) Primarily includes transfers out of credit losses related to

receivables securitized, transfers in of reserves related to
businesses acquired and reclassifications.

109

<PAGE>

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
------------------------------

Our report on the consolidated financial statements of AT&T Capital Corporation
and Subsidiaries is included on page 88 of this Form 10-K. In connection with
our audits of such financial statements, we have also audited the related
financial statement schedule listed as an exhibit on page 102 of this Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be
included therein.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York
March 6, 1997

110

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION

Thomas C. Wajnert
By_____________________________
Thomas C. Wajnert,
March 18, 1997 (Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Principal Executive Officer:

T. C. Wajnert Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer:

E. M. Dwyer Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Risk Management Officer

Thomas C. Wajnert
By _____________________________
Principal Accounting Officer: (Thomas C. Wajnert,
Attorney-in-fact* and
on his own behalf as
R. Oliu, Jr. Vice President, Controller Director and a Principal
and Chief Accounting Officer Executive Officer).

Directors:
T. C. Wajnert
J. Appleton
J.V. Babcock March 18, 1997
D.F. Banks
M.C. Chapman
G. Hands
H. Yamaji
J. J. Melone
B. Walker, Jr. * by power of attorney

111

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number

2 Certificate of Merger, filed October 1, 1996

3(b). Amended and Restated By-laws of the registrant is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the registrant's Current Report on
Form 8-K [No. 1-11237] dated October 1, 1996, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

4(b). First Indenture Supplement dated as of June 24, 1994, to the
Indenture is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4A-2 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 [No.33-54359] filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

4(c). Instruments other than described above in 4(a).and 4(b) that define
the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and all of
its consolidated subsidiaries, are omitted pursuant to Item
601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. The registrant hereby agrees to
furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.

4(d). Second Indenture Supplement dated as of January 10, 1997, to the
Indenture incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4A-3 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 [No. 33-18367]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(a). Operating Agreement between the registrant and AT&T dated as of
June 25, 1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605] filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(b). First Amendment to Operating Agreement between the registrant and
AT&T dated January 5, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(b) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237]
for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

112

<PAGE>

10(e). Registration Rights Agreement between the registrant and AT&T dated
as of June 25, 1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605]
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(f). Tax Agreements between the registrant and AT&T dated as of June 25,
1993 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 [No. 33-49605] filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(i). Form of Stock Purchase Agreement and related exhibits under the 1993
Leveraged Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 of the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1
[No. 33-49605] filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(k). Amendment Number 1 to the 1993 Share Performance Incentive Plan
dated November 14, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(o) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237]
for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

113

<PAGE>

10(q). AT&T Capital Corporation Executive Benefit Plan as amended
and restated effective as of December 4, 1995 is incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10(y) of the registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K [No. 1-11237] for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(s). AT&T Capital Corporation Compensation Limit Excess Plan
effective January 1, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10
(aa) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237]
for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(t). Amendment to the AT&T Capital Corporation Compensation Limit Excess
Plan dated October 1, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(ab) of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237]
for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(u). AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership Severance Plan effective
October 2, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ac) of
the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K [No. 1-11237] for the
year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

10(v). The Agreement between the registrant and AT&T dated January 5, 1996
is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ad) of the registrant's
Annual Reporton Form 10-K [No. 1-11237] for the year ended December
31, 1995, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

114

<PAGE>

10(y). Letter Agreement dated April 2, 1996 between Lucent Technologies
Inc. and the Company regarding the applicability of the Intercompany
Agreement to Lucent Technologies Inc. is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(c) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
[1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(z). Letter Agreement dated April 2, 1996 between Lucent Technologies
Inc. and the Company regarding the License to Use Lucent Name and
Mark is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) of the
registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter
Ended March 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

10(aa). Letter Agreement dated April 18, 1996 between NCR Corporation
and the Company regarding the applicability of the Intercompany
Agreement to NCR Corporation is incorporated is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(e) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(ab). Letter Agreement dated April 18, 1996 between NCR Corporation and
the Company regarding the License to Use NCR Name and Mark is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) of the registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended
March 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(ac). AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan, as
amended is incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy
Statement dated March19, 1996.

10(ad). Amendment to the AT&T Capital Corporation 1995 Senior Executive
Annual Incentive Plan dated October 1, 1996 is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1996, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

115

<PAGE>

10(ae). Amendment to the AT&T Capital Corporation Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan dated October 1, 1996 is incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10(b) of the registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(af). Amendment to Share Performance Award under the AT&T Capital
Corporation 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan dated October 1, 1996 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of the registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

10(ag). Amendment Number 2 to the AT&T Capital Corporation 1993 Share
Performance Incentive Plan dated October 1, 1996 is incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10(d) of the registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996,
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

10(ah). 1996 AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership Severance Plan
effective October 1, 1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(e) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237]
for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(ai). Employment Agreement between Antigua Acquisition Corporation and
Thomas C. Wajnert dated September 30, 1996 is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(f) of the registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(aj). AT&T Capital Corporation Stock Option Agreement dated October 1,
1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of the
registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(ak). AT&T Capital Corporation 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan dated
October 1, 1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) of
the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10(al). Credit Agreement dated as of September 16, 1996, among AT&T
Capital Corporation, the Banks Listed Herein and Morgan Guaranty
Trust Company of New York, as Agent (5-year term) is incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10(i)of the registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

116

<PAGE>

10(am). Credit Agreement dated as of September 16, 1996, among AT&T
Capital Corporation, the Banks Listed Herein and Morgan Guaranty
Trust Company of New York, as Agent (364-day term) is incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10(j) of the registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q [1-11237] for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10(an). Form of first Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger among
AT&T Capital Corporation, AT&T Corp., Hercules Limited and Antigua
Acquisition Corporation dated August 20, 1996 is incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10 of the registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K [No. 1-11237], filed with the ecurities and Exchange
Commission.

10(ao). Amendment No. 2 to the 1996 AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership
Severance Plan effective January 17, 1997.

16 Letter on change in certifying accountants - to the Securities and
Exchange Commission from Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., dated February
12, 1997 is incorporated by reference to exhibit 16 of the
registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K [No. 1-11237], filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

12. Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

21. Subsidiaries of the registrant.

23. Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

24(a). Powers of Attorney executed by officers and directors who signed
this report.

24(b). Certificate of Corporate Resolution.

27. Financial Data Schedule

117

<PAGE>

Exhibit 10(ao)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

AT&T Capital
------------

Amendment Number 2 1996 AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership
----------------------------------------

Severance Plan
--------------

The 1996 AT&T Capital Corporation Leadership Severance Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as set forth below:

1. Section 1(1) of the Plan is amended by inserting the following new
sentence after the first sentence of the section:

"No person who becomes employed by the Company or any Subsidiary on or
after January 17, 1997, shall be eligible to participate in the Plan."

<PAGE>

Exhibit 23
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
-------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
AT&T Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 (File No. 33-18367) of
our reports dated March 6, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of AT&T Capital Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York
March 18, 1997

<PAGE>

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the "Company"), proposes to file shortly with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, as
amended, an annual report on Form 10-K; and

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints RAMON OLIU,
JR., EDWARD M. DWYER and THOMAS C. WAJNERT, and each of them, as attorneys for
him and in his name, place and stead, and in each of his offices and capacities
as a director, an officer, or both an officer and a director of the Company, to
execute and file such annual report on Form 10-K, and thereafter to execute and
file any amendment or amendments thereto on Form 8 or any other applicable form,
hereby giving and granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, including the use or transmission of any
personal identification numbers assigned to the undersigned by the Securities
and Exchange Commission, as fully, for all intents and purposes, as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully
do, or cause to be done, by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 15th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Thomas C. Wajnert
-------------------------------------
Thomas C. Wajnert
Director, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 13th day of March, 1997.

/s/ John Appleton
-------------------------------------
John Appleton
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 10th day of March, 1997.

/s/ James V. Babcock
-------------------------------------
James V. Babcock
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 13th day of March, 1997.

/s/ David F. Banks
-------------------------------------
David F. Banks
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 10th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Max C. Chapman, Jr.
-------------------------------------
Max C. Chapman, Jr.
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 12th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Guy Hands
-------------------------------------
Guy Hands
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 10th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Joseph J. Melone
-------------------------------------
Joseph J. Melone
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 7th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Brooks Walker, Jr.
-------------------------------------
Brooks Walker, Jr.
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints RAMON OLIU,
JR., EDWARD M. DWYER and THOMAS C. WAJNERT, and each of them, as attorneys for
him and in his name, place and stead, and in each of his offices and capacities
as a director, an officer, or both an officer and a director of the Company, to
execute and file such annual report on Form 10-K, and thereafter to execute and
file any amendment or amendments thereto on Form 8 or any other applicable form,
hereby giving and granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be
done in an about the premises, including the use or transmission of any personal
identification numbers assigned to the undersigned by the Securities and
Exchange Commission, as fully, for all intents and purposes, as the undersigned
might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be
done, by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 14th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Hiromi Yamaji
-------------------------------------
Hiromi Yamaji
Director

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 11th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Edward M. Dwyer
-------------------------------------
Edward M. Dwyer
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 24(a)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director, an officer, or both an officer and
a director of the Company, as indicated below under his name:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 12th day of March, 1997.

/s/ Ramon Oliu, Jr.
-------------------------------------
Ramon Oliu, Jr.
Vice President and Controller

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24(b)
Form 10-K for 1996
File No. 1-11237

CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

I, Madelyn C. Law, an Assistant Secretary of AT&T Capital Corporation,
hereby certify that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Audit
Committee of AT&T Capital Corporation's Board of Directors at a meeting held on
March 13, 1997:

RESOLVED: that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1996
substantially in the form presented to the Committee at this meeting is
approved, with such changes as the Chief Financial Officer may approve, provided
that any material changes will also be approved by the General Counsel and the
Chief Executive Officer and that the Audit Committee will be advised of any
material changes made in the financial statements (or related notes) in the Form
10-K; and

FURTHER RESOLVED: that the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the Controller are each severally authorized to sign the Form 10-K
in the name and on behalf of the Company.

Madelyn C. Law

Dated: March 18, 1997 Madelyn C. Law

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted
from AT&T Capital Corporation's audited consolidated income statement and
balance sheet for and at the year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S> <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<CASH> 0
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 0
<ALLOWANCES> (168,986)
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 0<F2>
<PP&E> 0
<DEPRECIATION> (777,905)<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 8,092,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 0<F2>
<BONDS> 4,597,677
<COMMON> 902
0
0
<OTHER-SE> 706,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 8,092,512<F3>
<SALES> 90,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 1,952,190
<CGS> 78,538
<TOTAL-COSTS> 534,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 113,605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 458,039
<INCOME-PRETAX> 278,602
<INCOME-TAX> 110,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 168,539
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 168,539
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0

<FN>
* In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601 (c) 2, inapplicable or
immaterial financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1> Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.

<F2> This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare a
classified balance sheet.

<F3> Includes Company-obligated preferred securities of $200,000.
</FN>

<PAGE>