SHONEYS INC
PRRN14A, 1997-06-25
EATING PLACES
Previous: SERVICO INC, 424B4, 1997-06-25
Next: SHONEYS INC, 10-Q, 1997-06-25



<PAGE>
 
                              SOLICITING MATERIAL
     AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JUNE 25, 1997

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                       [AMENDMENT NO...................]

Filed by the Registrant [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement      [ ] Confidential, For Use of the Commission
                                         Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[X] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

 
                                SHONEY'S, INC.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                 RAYMOND D. SCHOENBAUM and BETTY J. SCHOENBAUM
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

  [X] No fee required.
  [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
     1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

         . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

         . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
         pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
         filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

         . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

         . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     5)  Total fee paid:

         . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  [ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
         
         . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
      Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
      was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
      statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

     1)  Amount previously paid: ____________________________________________
     2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement no.:_______________________
     3)  Filing Party: ______________________________________________________
     4)  Date Filed: ________________________________________________________

<PAGE>
 
CONTACT:
- ------- 

Stanley J. Kay, Jr.                      Joele Frank/Matthew Sherman
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.                 Abernathy MacGregor Group
(212) 929-5940                           (212) 371-5999


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
- --------------------- 

                       SHONEY'S SHAREHOLDERS' COMMITTEE
             SENDS LETTER TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SHONEY'S, INC.
                   REGARDING AMENDMENTS TO SHONEY'S BYLAWS.

        ATLANTA, GEORGIA (June 25, 1997) - Raymond D. Schoenbaum, on behalf of 
The Shoney's Shareholders' Committee, announced today that he has delivered a 
letter to the Board of Directors of Shoney's, Inc., in response to the Board's 
adoption of certain Bylaw amendments which appear designed to interfere with the
Committee's efforts to call a special meeting of Shoney's shareholders.

        The Bylaw amendments, which were adopted after the Committee initiated 
its efforts to call a special meeting, purport to eliminate the right of 
Shoney's shareholders to set the date, time and place of a special meeting.  In 
addition, the amendments purport to establish lengthy time frames relating to 
the call of a special meeting and the giving of notice of a special meeting, 
which would ostensibly permit the Board to substantially delay the date of a 
special meeting. The amendments also seek to permit the current officers and
employees of Shoney's to serve as inspectors of election at the special meeting.

        In his letter, Mr. Schoenbaum indicates that the Committee is 
disappointed with the Board's apparent attempt to manipulate the corporate 
governance process through these Bylaw amendments and that the Committee is 
prepared to go to court to enforce their legitimate rights.  Mr. Schoenbaum 
requests in the letter that the Board rescind these amendments and agree to his 
previously announced August 19 special meeting date.  He further states in the 
letter, "Setting the date at this time will provide absolute clarity as the 
process moves forward and the two-month time period between now and August 19 
will provide more than enough time for our shareholders to consider the relative
merits of [the Committee's proposal to remove and replace Shoney's current 
Board]."

                                       1
<PAGE>
The full text of the letter is as follows:

                                 June 25, 1997

Board of Directors of Shoney's, Inc.
1727 Elm Hill Pike
Nashville, Tennessee 37210

     Re:  Amendments to Shoney's Bylaws
          -----------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        We are disappointed to see that you have attempted to make changes to 
Shoney's Bylaws which purport to affect the rights of the shareholders of 
Shoney's to call a special meeting.  We can only assume that these changes are 
designed to delay the special meeting and to entrench the current Board and 
management.  This attempt to manipulate the corporate governance process for the
benefit of the current Board and management is yet another indication that 
Shoney's needs new leadership.  Shoney's is at a critical juncture, and the 
long-term viability of the Company is in danger.  Rather than engage in the 
manipulation of the rules reflected in your decision to amend the Bylaws, we 
believe (and are surprised that you do not believe) that the appropriate course 
of action is to let the real owners of Shoney's decide as soon as possible the 
future direction of our Company.  To the extent you delay this process, we will 
hold you fully accountable to the shareholders for any damages to our Company 
caused by this delay, including any continued deterioration in the business of 
Shoney's under current management.

        Our position is that these amendments do not have any effect on the 
action that we took one week earlier in reliance upon the then-existing Bylaws 
of the Company.  For example, your revised Bylaws contain a provision purporting
to require a shareholder seeking to call a special meeting to request that the 
Board fix a record date for purposes of determining the shareholders entitled to
call the meeting.  Under Section 48-17-102(b) of the Tennessee Business 
Corporation Act, a record date for the purpose of determining the shareholders 
entitled to call the meeting was set on June 16, 1997, the date on which I 
signed and delivered a call for a special meeting to the Company.  We do not 
read your subsequent amendment to the Bylaws as seeking to affect this record 
date which was validly set prior to the amendment.  Moreover, even if the 
amendment did purport to do so, it would not be valid since it would have the
effect of retroactively invalidating a record date which already has been
validly set.

                                       2
<PAGE>
        We also were surprised by your attempt to seize from the shareholders of
the Company their right under Shoney's Bylaws to set the date, time and place of
the special meeting, especially since we had acted already in reliance upon the 
then-existing Bylaws.  We believe the only possible purpose for such an action 
would be to entrench the current Board and management.  Moreover, the lengthy 
time frames which you purport to establish in the Bylaws relating to special 
meetings, including the time frames for purposes of determining the record date 
for the call of a special meeting and giving notice of the special meeting, 
appear designed only to frustrate the ability of the shareholders to determine 
for themselves in a timely manner whether the current Board and management 
should be replaced.  Finally, your amendment which seeks to permit the current 
officers and employees of the Company to serve as inspectors of election at the 
special meeting seems to us to be blatantly inappropriate in a contested 
situation.

        We will not allow the Board and the management of the Company to apply 
these amendments to the actions taken by us over the last week in connection 
with this matter, and if necessary, we are prepared to go to court to enforce 
our legitimate rights.  Your stated purposes in adopting the Bylaw amendments 
were to clarify the special meeting process and to provide the Company's 
shareholders with the opportunity to fully consider the issues.  If you are 
sincere in this regard, we request that you rescind these amendments and agree 
today to an August 19 special meeting date.  Setting the date at this time will 
provide absolute clarity as the process moves forward and the two-month time 
period between now and August 19 will provide more than enough time for our 
shareholders to consider the relative merits of what is being proposed.

        To require us to engage in a court battle with the current Board and 
management to enforce our legitimate rights would not be in anyone's interest.  
Shoney's shareholders do not have the time or the patience for the type of 
manipulation reflected in your adoption of the Bylaw amendments.  Shoney's is 
running out of time, and the shareholders must be permitted to take decisive 
action as soon as possible to ensure the long term survival of the Company for 
the benefit of all its constituencies.  Please confirm to me that you are 
willing to hold a special meeting on August 19, 1997.

        In order for us to act promptly in protecting our legitimate rights and 
the rights of all of Shoney's shareholders, we ask that you respond to this 
letter by the close of business on Thursday, June 26, 1997.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        /s/ Raymond D. Schoenbaum
                                        Raymond D. Schoenbaum

                                       3
<PAGE>
 
     The Committee's members, Raymond D. Schoenbaum and Betty J. Schoenbaum, are
respectively the son and wife of Alex Schoenbaum, who founded Shoney's in 1947
and served as its first Chairman.  Raymond D. Schoenbaum has been actively
involved in the restaurant industry since 1974, and he has extensive experience
in the business, including substantial experience in the full service dining
industry and in the quality fast food market.  From 1974 to 1985, Raymond D.
Schoenbaum successfully grew a Wendy's franchisee (Restaurants Systems, Inc.) to
in excess of 30 stores which he sold to Wendy's in 1985 for approximately $40
million.  Between 1985 and 1995 he developed and operated Ray's on the River and
Rio Bravo, a successful chain of casual restaurants.  In 1995, Raymond D.
Schoenbaum sold Ray's on the River and Rio Bravo to Applebee's International
Inc. for approximately $70 million, and became a director of Applebee's
following the sale.  In addition, Raymond D. Schoenbaum has been involved with
the turnaround of companies in the restaurant and restaurant services
industries, including Squirrel Companies, Inc., a manufacturer of restaurant
point-of-source computer equipment, as the former chairman of the board, and Max
& Erma's Restaurants, Inc., as a former member of the board and largest
shareholder.

                                   #   #   #


                       INFORMATION REGARDING PARTICIPANTS
                           AND CERTAIN OTHER PERSONS

Raymond D. Schoenbaum has his principal business address at 1640 Powers Ferry
Road, Building Two, Suite 100, Marietta, Georgia  30067.  Betty J. Schoenbaum
has her principal residential address at 5541 Gulf of Mexico Drive, Longboat
Key, Florida  34228.  Raymond D. Schoenbaum is a private investor. Betty J.
Schoenbaum is not employed.  As of the date hereof, Raymond D. Schoenbaum is
deemed to own beneficially (as that term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) 508,061 shares
of Common Stock of Shoney's, which constitutes approximately 1.0% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock (based on information provided by Shoney's in
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 16, 1997).  As
of the date hereof, Betty J. Schoenbaum is deemed to own beneficially 3,394,480
shares of Common Stock of Shoney's, which constitutes approximately 7.0% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock (based on information provided by Shoney's in
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 16, 1997).  As
of the date hereof, Raymond D. Schoenbaum and Betty J. Schoenbaum are deemed to
own beneficially 3,866,791 shares of Common Stock of Shoney's, which constitutes
approximately 8.0% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (based on
information provided by Shoney's in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended February 16, 1997).

                                       4
<PAGE>
 
In connection with Montgomery Securities' engagement as financial advisor to the
Shoney's Shareholders' Committee, the Committee anticipates that certain
employees of Montgomery Securities may communicate in person, by telephone or
otherwise with a limited number of institutions, brokers or other persons who
are shareholders for the purpose of assisting in the solicitation.  Montgomery
Securities will not receive any fee for, or in connection with, such
solicitation activities apart from the fees they are otherwise entitled to
receive under their engagement.  The principal business address of Montgomery
Securities is 600 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94111.  In the
ordinary course of its business, Montgomery Securities maintains customary
arrangements and may effect transactions in the securities of the Company for
the accounts of its customers.  As a result of its engagement by the Shoney's
Shareholders' Committee, Montgomery Securities restricted its proprietary
trading in the securities of Shoney's as of June 16, 1997 (although it may still
execute trades for customers on an unsolicited agency basis). As of June 12,
1997, Montgomery Securities did not beneficially own any Common Stock of
Shoney's, and held of record 10,312 shares of Common Stock for customer
accounts.

In addition, Howard E. Sachs, John S. Ellis and W. Douglas Benn, advisors to
Raymond D. Schoenbaum, may assist in soliciting Agent Designations, although
none of them nor the Shoney's Shareholders' Committee admits that any of them is
a "participant", as defined in Schedule 14A promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act.  Mr. Sachs has his principal
business address at 1901 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 260, Atlanta, Georgia  30339.
As of the date hereof, Mr. Sachs was the beneficial owner of 5,250 shares of
Common Stock of Shoney's. Mr. Ellis has his principal business address at 1640
Powers Ferry Road, Building Two, Suite 100, Marietta, Georgia  30067.  As of the
date hereof, Mr. Ellis did not own beneficially or of record any shares of
Common Stock. Mr. Benn has his principal business address at 1640 Powers Ferry
Road, Building Two, Suite 100, Marietta, Georgia  30067.  As of the date hereof,
Mr. Benn did not own beneficially or of record any shares of Common Stock.

                                       5


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission