NOVEMBER 30, 1999
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
DEPENDABLE, TAX-FREE INCOME TO HELP YOU KEEP MORE OF WHAT YOU EARN.
NTC
Connecticut
NMT
Massachusetts
NOM
Missouri
Highlights
As of November 30, 1999
Credit Quality Performance Highlights
Nuveen Connecticut Premium Income Municipal Fund (NTC)
o Taxable-equivalent yield on share
price of 8.24% *
o Has provided steady or increasing tax-free
dividends for 58 consecutive months
AAA/U.S. Guaranteed 76%
AA 19%
BBB/NR 5%
Nuveen Massachusetts Premium Income Municipal Fund (NMT)
o Taxable-equivalent yield on share price
of 8.83% *
o Has provided steady or increasing tax-free
dividends for 73 consecutive months
AAA/U.S. Guaranteed 76%
AA 18%
BBB/NR 6%
Nuveen Missouri Premium Income Municipal Fund (NOM)
o Taxable-equivalent yield on share price
of 9.15% *
o Has provided steady or increasing tax-free
dividends for 55 consecutive months
AAA/U.S. Guaranteed 76%
AA 18%
BBB/NR 6%
Past performance is not predictive of future results.
Contents
1 Dear Shareholder
4 NTC Commentary and Overview
7 NMT Commentary and Overview
10 NOM Commentary and Overview
13 Portfolio of Investments
22 Statement of Net Assets
23 Statement of Operations
24 Statement of Changes in Net Assets
25 Notes to Financial Statements
29 Financial Highlights
32 Build Your Wealth Automatically
33 Fund Information
* For investors in the 31% federal plus applicable state income tax bracket. See
your fund's Performance Overview in this report for more information.
<PAGE>
Photo of: Timothy R. Schwertfeger
Chairman of the Board
Sidebar text: Wealth takes a lifetime to build. Once achieved, it should be
preserved.
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to report to you on the performance of your Nuveen Exchange-Traded
Fund. Providing a stable, attractive tax-free dividend is the Fund's main
objective, and over the past six months, your Fund continued to achieve this
goal. During the period covered by this report, we have seen some shifts in the
U.S. investment climate and the fixed-income environment in which your Nuveen
Exchange-Traded Fund operates. I appreciate the opportunity to review the
current investment environment with you, as does the portfolio manager of your
Fund, who discusses fund performance later in this report.
A CHALLENGING INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
The U.S. economy enjoyed its ninth consecutive year of continuous expansion,
characterized by surprisingly robust growth, benign inflation, and unemployment
levels that remained among the lowest in three decades. However, concerns about
the persistent pace of economic expansion continued to test the new paradigm,
which holds that the improvements in productivity achieved through technology
enable us to have both economic growth and low inflation at the same time. As
investors watched and reacted to each announcement concerning economic
statistics, volatility increased, especially in the equity markets, and the
spectre of inflation seemed to lurk behind every report. Especially worrisome to
the Federal Reserve was the possibility that tight labor markets would
eventually have an inflationary effect on wages and, consequently, on consumer
prices.
In an effort to pre-empt this threat of inflation, the Fed moved to raise
interest rates by a quarter-point on three separate occasions between June and
November 1999. This brought the federal funds rate, which represents the amount
banks charge one another on overnight loans and serves as a standard for
short-term market rates, from 4.75% to 5.50%. These increases offset the three
rate cuts enacted by the Fed a year earlier. At its November meeting, the Fed
announced that it would shift to a neutral stance following the latest interest
rate increase, giving the markets some respite during the Y2K transition.
However, the Fed's indication that it would continue to closely watch the pace
of economic growth for any signs of inflationary pressure left the door open for
additional tightenings. In January 2000, the annual rotation among members of
the Fed's Open Market Committee, the body that ultimately decides interest rate
policy, will put several members considered more "hawkish" on inflation-
fighting into voting slots. This could tilt policy toward further rate increases
in the new year.
<PAGE>
Sidebar text: "Purchasing shares of a Nuveen Exchange-Traded Municipal Bond Fund
provides an easy way to incorporate the benefits of municipal bonds into a
balanced portfolio."
MUNICIPAL BOND PERFORMANCE
Over the past fiscal year, our exchange-traded municipal bond funds continued to
offer attractive, stable income in a market that places a high premium on yield.
At the end of November 1999, long-term municipal yields, represented
by the Bond Buyer 20, were 98% of 30-year Treasury yields, compared with the
historical average of 86% for the period 1986-1999. For investors, this meant
that quality long-term municipal bonds offered yields comparable to those of
long-term Treasury bonds - even before the tax advantages of municipals were
taken into account. Of course, Treasuries are backed by the full faith and
credit of the U.S. government. Even so, on an after-tax basis, municipal bonds
continued to present an exceptionally attractive investment option relative to
Treasuries.
During 1999, we saw the supply of municipal bonds drop off from the near-record
levels of 1998. This was largely due to the increase in interest rates, which
deterred municipal governments from issuing new debt and removed much of the
incentive to refund existing bonds. Municipal supply has declined by
approximately 20% from the levels of a year ago. This, in turn, tended to
enhance the attractiveness of the municipal bonds that were brought to market.
We anticipate that demand from individual investors will strengthen as investors
increasingly look at rebalancing their portfolios. With the outlook for tighter
supply and continued demand in the months ahead, Nuveen's established market
position as the leading sponsor of exchange-traded municipal bond funds should
enable us to have excellent access to bond offerings that have the potential to
add value for our shareholders.
A BALANCED PORTFOLIO: ENHANCED GROWTH WITH REDUCED RISK
If you are like most investors today, your goals for investing probably include
capturing high after-tax total returns while moderating risk. To demonstrate the
role that municipal bonds can play in achieving this goal, Nuveen tracked a
balanced portfolio consisting of equities and municipal bonds and compared its
hypothetical investment performance - based on appropriate market indexes and
tax rates - with that of a balanced portfolio composed of equities and taxable
bonds.
Our research showed that, over the past 20 years, the pairing of equities with
municipal bonds provided both superior after-tax total returns and lower levels
of risk than the combination of equities and taxable bonds for investors in high
tax brackets. Incorporating even a 20% allocation of municipal bonds into an
all-equity portfolio cut risk substantially, with only a small reduction in
after-tax total return. Purchasing shares of a Nuveen Exchange-Traded Municipal
Bond Fund provides an easy way to incorporate the benefits of municipal bonds
into a balanced portfolio. It is important to
<PAGE>
note, however, that the past results mentioned in our example relate to bond
indexes and not to any particular product. In addition, they do not necessarily
predict future performance.
NUVEEN FUNDS: AN ANSWER TO YOUR INVESTMENT NEEDS
In light of the recent shifts in the investment environment, your financial
adviser can serve as a valuable resource in helping you determine if adjustments
are needed in your current asset allocation plan and suggesting investments that
can add diversification to your portfolio. By investing in other Nuveen funds,
you can bring balance to your portfolio and gain exposure to the different types
of investments that can enhance your potential for success. Your adviser can
also establish a reinvestment plan designed to purchase additional shares of
your Nuveen Exchange-Traded Fund. For more information on Nuveen's expanding
array of funds, contact your financial adviser for a prospectus detailing all
charges and expenses, or call Nuveen at (800) 621-7227. Please read the
prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
WELCOME TO THE NEW MILLENNIUM
During 1999, Nuveen committed significant resources - both financial and
personal - to ensuring that the transition to the year 2000 caused no
disruptions for our shareholders. Our preparations included advance testing of
all critical operating systems and careful review of each municipal issuer Y2K
compliance, with special attention to the largest and more volatile holdings in
our Funds' portfolios. We were assisted in our efforts by securities industry
oversight organizations, including the Securities Industry Association, the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the Securities and Exchange
Commission, as well as rating agencies and insurance companies. As a result, we
were fully prepared for the transition, from an operational as well as an
investment perspective. As expected, the Y2K transition was a non-event for our
company and our shareholders as well as throughout the general economy. The
diligence of the financial industry as a whole in dealing with the Y2K
transition should prove to have ongoing benefits for investors.
Since 1898, Nuveen has been synonymous with investments that stand the test of
time. As we enter the new millennium, we remain committed to maintaining that
reputation and finding the best ways to serve your evolving investment needs.
Thank you for your continued confidence.
Sincerely,
/S/ TIMOTHY R. SCHWERTFEGER
TIMOTHY R. SCHWERTFEGER
Chairman of the Board
January 18, 2000
<PAGE>
Nuveen Connecticut Premium Income Municipal Fund
Portfolio Manager's Comments
Portfolio manager Paul Brennan discusses the market environment in Connecticut,
fund performance, and key strategies used to manage the Nuveen Connecticut
Premium Income Municipal Fund (NTC). Paul, who has more than eight years of
experience as an investment professional, joined Flagship in 1991 and came to
Nuveen in 1997 after Nuveen acquired Flagship. He has managed NTC since August
1999.
WHAT FACTORS AFFECTED CONNECTICUT'S ECONOMY DURING THE 12 MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER
30, 1999?
The Connecticut economy, which suffered a severe decline during the recession of
the early 1990s, has experienced moderate, sustainable growth that has recently
been constrained some what by tight labor markets and sluggish population
growth. Following employment growth of 2% in 1998, which brought the state's
total employment to more than 98% of its pre-recession peak, Connecticut is
reporting 1999 gains in the 1% range. In November 1999, unemployment in the
state was 3.0%, compared with 3.2% in November 1998 and a current national
average of 4.1%. The state continued to diversify and move away from
manufacturing and defense-related industries to a more service-oriented economy.
Between 1988 and 1998, manufacturing jobs declined from 22.8% of the state's
employment base to 16.9%. Standard & Poor's estimates growth slowing to less
than 1% in the years 2000-2004.
In terms of personal income, Connecticut continued to rank as the nation's
wealthiest state, a position it has held for four consecutive years. For 1999,
per capita personal income is estimated at 144% of the U.S. average. This, in
turn, contributed to the state's strong growth in state income tax receipts.
HOW DID THESE EVENTS IMPACT MUNICIPAL BOND SUPPLY AND DEMAND IN CONNECTICUT?
For the first 11 months of 1999, new municipal issuance in Connecticut totaled
$3.1 billion, down 15% from the same period in 1998. This compares with a
nationwide decline of 20% in municipal supply. Despite the overall decline in
1999, the state saw increased issuance activity in the second half of the year,
with new supply up 18% over the previous six months. Some of this increase may
have been due to issuers' desire to avoid potential Y2K problems by accelerating
the year's issuance calendar.
Demand for in-state paper remained high in 1999, especially on the part of
affluent individual investors who sought the benefits of the tax-exempt income
offered by municipal bonds. In addition, many investors focused on rebalancing
their portfolios by redirecting assets from equity investments into the
fixed-income market.
GIVEN THAT NTC'S PRIMARY OBJECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE STABLE, ATTRACTIVE TAX-EXEMPT
INCOME, WHAT FACTORS AFFECTED THE FUND'S DIVIDEND?
During the past year, good call protection helped support NTC's dividend and
shield the income of this Fund from erosion. In addition, specific dividend
management strategies and the prudent use of leverage enabled us to increase the
Fund's dividend in May 1999. As of November 30, 1999, NTC had provided
shareholders with 58 consecutive months of steady or increasing dividends. At
the end of November, the market yield on the Fund was 5.44%, equivalent to a
taxable yield1 of 8.24% for investors in the combined 34% federal and state
income tax bracket.
As a leveraged fund, NTC issues MuniPreferred shares that pay short-term
interest rates to investors seeking short-term liquidity. Short-term municipal
rates are usually (but not always) lower than long-term rates. The proceeds from
these preferred shares are used to buy additional long-term bonds for the Fund's
portfolio. These bonds can generate additional net income for the common
shareholders, but leverage will increase NAV volatility. When short-term
interest rates remain below long-term rates, common shareholders can potentially
earn extra income from the difference between the rate earned on the Fund's
long-term portfolio and the short-term rate paid to preferred shareholders.
While leveraged funds carry higher risk than non-leveraged funds, they are
compensated for this additional risk in the form of potentially higher yields.
OVERALL, HOW DID NTC PERFORM OVER THE PAST YEAR?
For the 12 months ended November 30, 1999, NTC produced a total return on net
asset value (NAV) of -5.10%, providing a taxable-equivalent total return1 of
- -2.20% for shareholders in the combined 34% federal and state income tax
bracket. By comparison, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index2 posted a
one-year total return of -1.07%, while the Fund's Lipper Peer Group3 had a
one-year total return of -5.11%, as of November 30, 1999.
The underperformance of NTC's total return on NAV relative to its Lehman
benchmark can be attributed largely to the Fund's longer duration4. As of
November 30, 1999, NTC's leverage-adjusted duration was 13.23, compared with the
Lehman index's 7.50. Duration measures a bond fund's price volatility, or
reaction to interest rate movements. The longer the duration, the more sensitive
the fund's NAV is to changes in interest rates. During a period of falling
interest rates, a long duration enables a fund's NAV to participate more fully
in market gains. However, when interest rates rise, a long duration can make the
fund's NAV more vulnerable to price declines (when market yields rise, bond
values fall). For the 12 months beginning December 1998 and ending November
1999, the yield on the Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index5 rose from 5.25% to 6.14%.
This meant that funds with longer durations, like NTC, were more likely to
underperform the market, as represented by the unleveraged Lehman Brothers
Municipal Bond Index.
1 The taxable-equivalent yield/total return represents the yield/total return
that must be earned on a taxable investment in order to equal the yield/total
return of the Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The taxable-equivalent yield
is based on the fund's current market yield and a combined federal and state
income tax rate of 34%, while the taxable-equivalent total return is based on
the annualized total return and a combined federal and state income tax rate
of 34%.
2 NTC's performance is compared with that of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond
Index, an unleveraged index comprising a broad range of investment-grade
municipal bonds. Results for the index do not reflect any expenses.
3 The total return for NTC is compared with the average annualized return of
the 17 funds in the Lipper Other States Closed-End Municipal Debt Funds
category. Fund and Lipper returns assume reinvestment of dividends.
4 Fund duration, also known as leverage-adjusted duration, takes into account
the leveraging process for the fund and therefore differs from the duration of
the actual portfolio of individual bonds that make up the fund. Unless
otherwise noted, references to duration in this commentary are intended to
indicate fund duration.
5 The Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term municipal
revenue bonds.
<PAGE>
Over the past 12 months, NTC's duration lengthened from 9.30 due to market
action as well as trading activity, as we tried to take advantage of the recent
rise in interest rates. As part of this, we sold some bonds with shorter
durations, especially those with poor call protection and those that were close
to maturity, and reinvested the proceeds in issues with longer durations, which
provided better call protection and attractive yields that helped to support the
dividend. The Fund's longer duration should help position NTC to regain net
asset value if the bond market recovers and interest rates decline.
WHAT ABOUT THE FUND'S SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE?
In 1999, concerns about rising interest rates, inflation, and the Federal
Reserve's monetary policies created a negative environment in the fixed-income
markets. In addition, worries about the transition to the year 2000 precipitated
an early start to tax-swap season, as investors attempted to off set profits in
the equity markets by selling fixed-income investments at a loss. The liquidity
concerns engendered by Y2K also prompted some investors to opt for money market
funds and other short-term instruments as the best place to park cash over the
year end. Given this environment, the Fund's share price declined. Since the
prevailing interest rate environment in November 1999 was higher than that of a
year earlier, the Fund's NAV also declined, as bond prices fell while interest
rates rose. The fact that the Fund's premium (share price above NAV) widened
despite this negative climate reflects the competitiveness of NTC's yield as
well as the scarcity of long-term bonds in the Connecticut market.
Premium6 Total Return on Share Price
------------------- ---------------------------
1-Year Ended Taxable-
11/30/98 11/30/99 11/30/99 Equivalent1
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
NTC 11.02% 13.46% -3.66% -1.06%
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
Past performance is not predictive of future results.
For additional information on NTC, see its Performance Overview in this report.
WHAT KEY STRATEGIES WERE USED TO MANAGE NTC DURING THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS
REPORT?
NTC was managed with the goals of supporting and strengthening its long-term
dividend-paying capabilities, improving call protection, and enhancing the
Fund's tax efficiency.
In the area of bond calls, NTC currently provides excellent levels of
protection, with only 2% callable in 2000 and 2001 and only 8% of its portfolio
subject to calls in 2002. This should provide additional protection and
stability for the Fund's dividend over this period. To reduce the effect of
calls, we continuously work on strategies designed to enhance call protection.
As mentioned earlier, we have been active buyers in the current market as we try
to take advantage of the higher interest rate environment. These recent
purchases also benefit the Fund by extending call protection. This should enable
the Fund to continue providing competitive levels of dividends for shareholders.
During 1999, a number of new issuers came to market, enabling us to enhance the
Fund's diversification while picking up additional yield. In one of these
offerings, we negotiated directly with the underwriter to purchase all of the
general obligation bonds with a certain maturity issued by the town of Cheshire,
which is an infrequent borrower. Since much of Connecticut's issuance over the
past few years has come from the healthcare sector, this gave us an opportunity
to increase our weighting in tax-backed paper offering the additional benefit of
attractive yields. We also added general obligation bonds and special tax-backed
bonds issued by the state itself.
Given the supply of healthcare bonds in the Connecticut market, we also were
able to find value in the healthcare sector, a more volatile area of the market
that has recently been affected by concerns about deregulation and
profitability. This has created credit and rating pressures for certain
healthcare organizations and caused some investors to avoid the sector entirely.
Since one of Nuveen's strategies is to try and discover value in sectors and
bonds that have been overlooked by the rest of the market, the healthcare sector
has been an area where Nuveen research and our prudent investment approach have
enabled us to find and exploit opportunities that can benefit our shareholders.
Over the past 12 months, NTC has maintained an allocation of approximately 20%
in this sector.
Over the past six months, enhanced tax efficiency also became an increasing
focus for us, as the rising interest rate environment offered opportunities to
benefit the Fund through active trading. The strategy we employed involved
selling selected bonds that were trading at a loss, recognizing the capital
losses, and then rolling the proceeds into bonds with similar characteristics,
while offering attractive yields and better call protection. Some of the bonds
we sold were due to mature or scheduled to be called within the next few months,
while others were bonds that we had purchased earlier this year that were now
producing a lower income stream than that recently available in the market. This
trading not only gave us capital losses with which to offset current and future
capital gains, thereby protecting shareholders from additional taxes, but also -
in most cases - strengthened the net earning of the Fund. If current market
conditions continue, we will continue to focus on implementing this strategy.
NTC offers outstanding credit quality, with 76% of the Fund's assets invested in
bonds rated AAA/U.S. guaranteed at the end of November 1999. The Fund also had a
5% allocation of BBB and non-rated bonds. These lower-rated bonds generally
provided enhanced levels of yield and helped to support the dividend, especially
as credit spreads (or the difference in yield between higher credit quality
securities and those of lower credit quality) widened in recent months.
WHAT IS NUVEEN'S OUTLOOK FOR NTC?
In general, we believe that NTC is currently well-positioned for a potential
recovery in the bond market. In coming months, if current market conditions
persist, we will continue to focus on enhancing the Fund's tax efficiency. In
this way, we can strengthen the long-term dividend-paying capabilities of the
Fund. We also plan to continue keeping the Fund well diversified. Implementing
strategies such as these that have the potential to benefit the Fund
demonstrates the value that can be added by an active bond manager such as
Nuveen.
1 The taxable-equivalent total return represents the total return that must be
earned on a taxable investment in order to equal the total return of the
Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The taxable-equivalent total return is
based on the annualized total return and a combined federal and state income
tax rate of 34%.
6 A fund's premium/discount repre sents the percentage difference between the
fund's share price and its net asset value (NAV).
<PAGE>
Nuveen Connecticut Premium Income Municipal Fund
Performance Overview
As of November 30, 1999
NTC
Portfolio Statistics
Inception Date 5/93
- --------------------------------------------------
Share Price $15
- --------------------------------------------------
Net Asset Value $13.22
- --------------------------------------------------
Market Yield 5.44%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield
(Federal Tax Rate)1 7.88%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield
(Federal and State Tax Rate)1 8.24%
- --------------------------------------------------
Fund Net Assets ($000) $107,295
- --------------------------------------------------
Average Effective Maturity (Years) 18.02
- --------------------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Duration 13.23
- --------------------------------------------------
Annualized Total Return
On Share Price On NAV
- --------------------------------------------------
1-Year -3.66% -5.10%
- --------------------------------------------------
5-Year 12.00% 10.31%
- --------------------------------------------------
Since Inception 5.36% 4.64%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Total Return2
On Share Price On NAV
- --------------------------------------------------
1-Year -1.06% -2.20%
- --------------------------------------------------
5-Year 14.94% 13.37%
- --------------------------------------------------
Since Inception 8.15% 7.55%
- --------------------------------------------------
Top Five Sectors (as a % of total investments)
Healthcare 21%
- --------------------------------------------------
Education and Civic Organizations 17%
- --------------------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed 12%
- --------------------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/General 10%
- --------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Care 7%
- --------------------------------------------------
Bar Chart:
1998-1999 Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share
12/98 0.0665
1/99 0.0665
2/99 0.0665
3/99 0.0665
4/99 0.0665
5/99 0.068
6/99 0.068
7/99 0.068
8/99 0.068
9/99 0.068
10/99 0.068
11/99 0.068
Line Chart:
Share Price Performance
12/1/98 16.44
16.5
16.5
16.44
16.06
15.56
15.56
15.69
16.06
16.19
16.25
16.13
16.38
16.5
16.44
16.63
16.5
16.56
16.81
16.75
16.81
16.69
16.75
16.75
16.75
16.06
16.31
16.25
16.44
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.25
16.38
16
15.88
15.88
15.88
15.44
15.19
15.19
15.06
15.06
15.06
15.4375
15.38
15.13
15.19
15.06
11/30/99 15
Weekly Closing Price
Past performance is not predictive of future results.
1 Taxable-equivalent yield represents the yield on a taxable investment
necessary to equal the yield of the Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The
federal only rate is based on the current market yield and a federal income
tax rate of 31%. The rate shown for federal and state highlights the added
value of owning shares that are also exempt from state income taxes. It is
based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34%.
2 Taxable-equivalent total return is based on the annualized total return and a
combined federal and state income tax rate of 34%. It represents the total
return on a taxable investment necessary to equal the total return of the
Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis.
<PAGE>
Nuveen Massachusetts Premium Income Municipal Fund
Portfolio Manager's Comments
Portfolio manager Tom Futrell reviews the Massachusetts market environment,
recent fund performance, and the outlook for the Nuveen Massachusetts Premium
Income Municipal Fund (NMT). A 15-year veteran of Nuveen, Tom has managed NMT
since July 1998.
WHAT FACTORS AFFECTED MASSACHUSETTS' ECONOMY DURING THE 12 MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER
30, 1999?
The strength of Massachusetts' recent economic growth was reflected in the
state's low unemployment statistics and solid job growth. For November 1999,
unemployment in the state was 3.2%, on par with the November 1998 number and
well below the current national average of 4.1%. Job growth centered on such
high-paying sectors as technology and research and development, due to the high
educational levels of state residents. Although the technology sector in
Massachusetts continued to perform well, the state lost several new projects to
Silicon Valley in California. During 1999, however, Massachusetts received an
infusion of venture capital second only to that received by California,
according to the Associated Press. The majority of that capital was invested in
high-tech companies, which could translate into improved performance in the
technology sector over the next few years. In 2000, economic growth in the state
is expected to continue, although at a slower pace, due in part to tight labor
markets.
From a capital investment perspective, several projects, involving both public
and private funds, are underway or on the board, especially in Boston. The
international terminal at Logan Airport is currently being upgraded, with the
goal of expanding the international travel handled by the airport. A combination
of debt and current revenues is being used to finance the improvements. Also at
Logan, the possibility of additional runways is being explored. In the Boston
Pier area, a private developer has proposed investing $1 billion to develop
residential and commercial properties on Boston's waterfront, while work on
Boston's Central Artery Project continues.
HOW DID THESE EVENTS IMPACT MUNICIPAL BOND SUPPLY AND DEMAND IN MASSACHUSETTS?
Total new municipal issuance in Massachusetts for the first 11 months of 1999
was $6.8 billion, down 25% from 1998 levels. This compares with a decline of
just over 20% in national municipal supply during the same period. Some of this
decline - both statewide and nationally - can be attributed to a drop-off in
refunding activity, which is typical in a rising interest rate environment. The
majority of new issuance was concentrated in the healthcare and education
sectors of the market. Despite the drop in new supply, Massachusetts remains a
high issuance state, ranking eighth in the nation for the period January through
November 1999.
Demand from individual investors remained good over the past year, although
institutional demand was weakened by events outside the municipal market that
limited the cashflow available for bond purchases (e.g., insurance claims from
natural disasters, demand for mutual fund redemptions). On a nationwide basis,
individual investors held more than 30% of outstanding municipal debt in 1998,
making them the largest owner class, and statistics indicate that municipal bond
sales to retail investors in 1999 were on track to beat 1998's record levels.
GIVEN THAT NMT'S PRIMARY OBJECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE STABLE, ATTRACTIVE TAX-EXEMPT
INCOME, WHAT FACTORS AFFECTED THE FUND'S DIVIDEND?
During the past year, good call protection, specific dividend management
strategies, and the prudent use of leverage helped support NMT's dividend and
shield the income of this fund from erosion. As a leveraged fund, NMT issues
MuniPreferred shares that pay short-term interest rates to investors seeking
short-term liquidity. Short-term municipal rates are usually (but not always)
lower than long-term rates. The proceeds from these preferred shares are used to
buy additional long-term bonds for the Fund's portfolio. These bonds can
generate additional net income for the common shareholders, but leverage
increases NAV volatility.
As of November 30, 1999, NMT had provided shareholders with 73 consecutive
months of steady or increasing dividends. At the end of November, the market
yield on the Fund was a competitive 5.74%, equivalent to a taxable yield1 of
8.83% for investors in a combined federal and state income tax bracket of 35%.
OVERALL, HOW DID NMT PERFORM OVER THE PAST YEAR?
For the 12 months ended November 30, 1999, NMT produced a total return on net
asset value (NAV) of -5.00%, providing a taxable-equivalent total return1 of
- -1.91% for shareholders in the combined 35% federal and state income tax
bracket. By comparison, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index2 posted a
one-year total return of -1.07%, while the Fund's Lipper Peer Group3 had a
one-year total return of -5.11%, as of November 30, 1999. In recognition of this
risk-adjusted performance, NMT was awarded a Morningstar4 rating of four stars,
representing the Fund's overall rating among 193 closed-end municipal bond
funds, as of November 30, 1999.
1 The taxable-equivalent yield/total return represents the yield/total return
that must be earned on a taxable investment in order to equal the yield/total
return of the Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The taxable-equivalent yield
is based on the fund's current market yield and a combined federal and state
income tax rate of 35%, while the taxable-equivalent total return is based on
the annualized total return and a combined federal and state income tax rate
of 35%.
2 NMT's performance is compared with that of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond
Index, an unleveraged index comprising a broad range of investment-grade
municipal bonds. Results for the index do not reflect any expenses.
3 The total return for NMT is compared with the average annualized return of the
17 funds in the Lipper Other States Closed-End Municipal Debt Funds category.
Fund and Lipper returns assume reinvestment of dividends.
4 Morningstar proprietary ratings reflect historical risk-adjusted performance
as of November 30, 1999. The ratings are subject to change every month. Past
performance is no guarantee of future results. Morningstar ratings are
calculated from the fund's three-, five-, and ten-year average annual returns
(if applicable) in excess of 90-day Treasury bill returns with appropriate fee
adjustments and a risk factor that reflects fund performance below 90-day
T-bill returns. NMT received three stars for the three-year period and four
stars for the five-year period. The top 10% of the funds in a broad asset
class receive five stars, the next 22.5% receive four stars, and the next 35%
receive three stars. The fund was rated among 193 closed-end municipal bond
funds for the three-year period and 193 closed-end municipal bond funds for
the five-year period, ended November 30, 1999.
<PAGE>
The underperformance of NMT's total return on NAV relative to its Lehman
benchmark can be attributed largely to the Fund's longer duration5. As of
November 30, 1999, NMT's leverage-adjusted duration was 11.96, compared with the
Lehman Index's 7.50. Duration measures a bond fund's price volatility, or
reaction to interest rate movements. The longer the duration, the more sensitive
the fund's NAV is to changes in interest rates. During a period of falling
interest rates, a long duration enables a fund's NAV to participate more fully
in market gains. However, when interest rates rise, a long duration can make the
fund's NAV more vulnerable to price declines. For the 12 months beginning
December 1998 and ending November 1999, the yield on the Bond Buyer Revenue Bond
Index6 rose from 5.25% to 6.14%. This meant that funds with longer durations,
like NMT, were more likely to underperform the market, as represented by the
unleveraged Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index.
Over the past 12 months, NMT's duration lengthened from 9.64 due to market
action and trading activity. Proceeds from sold bonds were reinvested in issues
with longer durations, which benefited the Fund by providing attractive yields
and better call protection. NMT's longer duration should help position the Fund
to regain net asset value if the bond market recovers and interest rates
decline.
WHAT ABOUT THE FUND'S SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE?
In 1999, concerns about rising interest rates, inflation, and the actions of the
Federal Reserve created a negative environment in the fixed-income markets. In
addition, worries about the transition to the year 2000 precipitated an early
start to tax-swap season, as investors tried to offset profits in the equity
markets by selling fixed-income investments at a loss. The liquidity concerns
accompanying Y2K also prompted some investors to opt for money market funds and
other short-term instruments as the best place to park cash over the year end.
All of these factors negatively impacted the market demand for exchange-traded
funds such as NMT and resulted in a decline in the Fund's share price.
At the same time, the prevailing interest rate environment in November 1999 was
higher than that of a year earlier, causing a decline in the Fund's NAV, as bond
prices fell while interest rates rose. As a result of these factors, NMT's
premium (share price above NAV) narrowed. The stability of NMT's dividend,
combined with the Fund's superior credit quality, helped to minimize this shift.
Premium7 Total Return on Share Price
----------------- ---------------------------
1-Year Ended Taxable-
11/30/98 11/30/99 11/30/99 Equivalent1
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
NMT 9.47% 8.86% -6.08% -3.26%
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
Past performance is not predictive of future results.
For additional information on NMT, see its Performance Overview in this report.
WHAT KEY STRATEGIES WERE USED TO MANAGE NMT DURING THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS
REPORT?
NMT was managed with the goals of improving portfolio structure, strengthening
the Fund's long-term dividend-paying capabilities, and enhancing tax
efficiency.
NMT currently offers excellent levels of bond call protection, with only 1% of
its portfolio subject to calls in 2000 and 10% in 2001. This should provide
additional protection and stability for the Fund's dividend over this period. To
reduce the effect of calls, we continuously work on strategies designed to
enhance call protection. For example, we have been active buyers in the current
market as we try to take advantage of the higher interest rate environment.
These recent purchases also benefit the Fund by extending call protection and
enhancing our ability to provide competitive levels of dividends for our
shareholders.
Among the issues we purchased as part of our efforts to enhance portfolio
structure were bonds issued by the Massachusetts Development Finance Authority
for a multifamily housing project in Springfield. These GNMA-collateralized
bonds offered an attractive 6.5% yield as well as call protection through 2010
without extending the duration of the Fund. Purchases such as these replaced
bonds with poorer structure (e.g., shorter call protection), including some
pre-refunded bonds. Because of healthy retail demand, we were able to obtain
very attractive prices for the bonds that were sold. Enhancing the Fund's tax
efficiency became an increasing focus for us over the past six months, as the
rising interest rate environment offered opportunities to capture tax losses.
The tax strategy we employed involved selling selected bonds that were trading
at a loss, recognizing the capital losses, and then rolling the proceeds into
bonds with similar characteristics, but offering attractive yields and better
call protection. Some of the bonds we sold were issues that we had purchased
earlier this year that were now producing a lower income stream than that
recently available in the market. This trading not only gave us capital losses
with which to offset current and future capital gains, thereby protecting
shareholders from additional taxes, but also - in most cases - increased the net
earnings of the Fund.
As of the end of November 1999, NMT offered excellent credit quality, with 76%
of the Fund's assets invested in bonds rated AAA/U.S. guaranteed and AA. The
Fund also had a 6% allocation of BBB and non-rated bonds. These lower-rated
bonds generally provided enhanced levels of yield and helped to support the
dividend, especially as credit spreads (or the difference in yield between
higher credit quality securities and those of lower credit quality) widened in
recent months.
WHAT IS NUVEEN'S OUTLOOK FOR NMT?
Looking ahead for NMT, we will try to take advantage of the higher yields
currently available in the municipal market to enhance portfolio structure and
the dividend-paying capabilities of the Fund. This includes searching for
opportunities to purchase bonds in the lower credit quality sectors that can
provide additional income for the Fund. If current market conditions persist, we
will also continue to focus on strategies that enhance the Fund's tax
efficiency. In any buying and selling, we will try to ensure that the trades are
duration-neutral in order to maintain the Fund's current duration. The ability
to implement strategies with the potential to benefit the Fund demonstrates the
value that can be added by an active bond manager such as Nuveen.
1 The taxable-equivalent total return represents the total return that must be
earned on a taxable investment in order to equal the total return of the
Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The taxable-equivalent total return is
based on the annualized total return and a combined federal and state income
tax rate of 35%.
5 Fund duration, also known as leverage-adjusted duration, takes into account
the leveraging process for the fund and therefore differs from the duration of
the actual portfolio of individual bonds that make up the fund. Unless
otherwise noted, references to duration in this commentary are intended to
indicate fund duration.
6 The Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term municipal
revenue bonds.
7 A fund's premium/discount represents the percentage difference between the
fund's share price and its net asset value (NAV).
<PAGE>
Nuveen Massachusetts Premium Income Municipal Fund
Performance Overview
As of November 30, 1999
NMT
Portfolio Statistics
Inception Date 3/93
- --------------------------------------------------
Share Price $14 3/4
- --------------------------------------------------
Net Asset Value $13.55
- --------------------------------------------------
Market Yield 5.74%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield
(Federal Tax Rate)1 8.32%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield
(Federal and State Tax Rate)1 8.83%
- --------------------------------------------------
Fund Net Assets ($000) $96,988
- --------------------------------------------------
Effective Maturity (Years) 16.8
- --------------------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Duration 11.96
- --------------------------------------------------
Annualized Total Return
On Share Price On NAV
- --------------------------------------------------
1-Year -6.08% -5.00%
- --------------------------------------------------
5-Year 11.18% 10.22%
- --------------------------------------------------
Since Inception 5.34% 5.22%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Total Return2
On Share Price On NAV
- --------------------------------------------------
1-Year -3.26% -1.91%
- --------------------------------------------------
5-Year 14.42% 13.54%
- --------------------------------------------------
Since Inception 8.40% 8.36%
- --------------------------------------------------
Top Five Sectors (as a % of total investments)
U.S. Guaranteed 21%
- --------------------------------------------------
Education and Civic Organizations 19%
- --------------------------------------------------
Healthcare 17%
- --------------------------------------------------
Housing/Multifamily 10%
- --------------------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/General 8%
- --------------------------------------------------
Bar Chart:
1998-1999 Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share3
12/98 0.0705
1/99 0.0705
2/99 0.0705
3/99 0.0705
4/99 0.0705
5/99 0.0705
6/99 0.0705
7/99 0.0705
8/99 0.0705
9/99 0.0705
10/99 0.0705
11/99 0.0705
Share Price Performance
12/1/98 16.69
16.75
16.75
16.81
16.44
16.25
16
16
16.63
16.81
16.88
16.81
17
16.94
16.94
16.94
16.94
16.75
16.75
16.5
16.38
16.06
15.94
16.06
16.19
15.88
16.06
16.13
16.31
16.38
16.5
16.44
16.31
16.25
16
15.94
16.06
15.88
15.38
15
15.06
15.13
15
15
15
15.13
14.88
14.88
14.88
11/30/99 14.75
Weekly Closing Price
Past performance is not predictive of future results.
1 Taxable-equivalent yield represents the yield on a taxable investment
necessary to equal the yield of the Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The
federal only rate is based on the current market yield and a federal income
tax rate of 31%. The rate shown for federal and state highlights the added
value of owning shares that are also exempt from state income taxes. It is
based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 35%.
2 Taxable-equivalent total return is based on the annualized total return and a
combined federal and state income tax rate of 35%. It represents the total
return on a taxable investment necessary to equal the total return of the
Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis.
3 The Fund also paid shareholders net ordinary income distributions in December
1998 of $0.0051 per share.
<PAGE>
Nuveen Missouri Premium Income Municipal Fund
Portfolio Manager's Comments
Portfolio manager Mike Davern talks about the Missouri municipal market, the
performance of the Nuveen Missouri Premium Income Municipal Fund (NOM), and the
key strategies used to manage the Fund. Mike, who has more than 15 years of
experience as an investment professional, joined Nuveen in 1992 and has managed
NOM since July 1998.
WHAT FACTORS AFFECTED MISSOURI'S ECONOMY DURING THE 12 MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER
30,1999?
The economic environment in Missouri was dominated by the services and wholesale
and retail trade (e.g., Walmart) sectors. Kansas City, in particular,
experienced strong growth, as it became a mecca for the technology,
communication, and transportation industries. The state currently has
significant exposure to the defense industry, with aircraft manufacturers such
as Boeing and McDonnell Douglas serving as major employers. For November 1999,
unemployment in Missouri was 2.6%, down from 3.5% in November 1998 and sharply
lower than the current national average of 4.1%. Overall, the state's economic
growth can be characterized as moderate.
On the national front, the U.S. economy continued to forge ahead with few signs
of slowing, as growth was fueled by strong consumer spending, which continued to
serve as the main engine powering economic expansion. For the most part,
however, this growth did not translate into higher consumer prices. Through the
end of November 1999, the Consumer Price Index showed inflation maintaining its
low profile, with an annualized increase of 2.6%. Despite the Fed's continued
vigilance on the inflation front, as evidenced by the three interest rate
increases it enacted between June and November 1999, the cumulative effect of
1999's economic events was negative for the fixed-income markets, including
municipal bonds.
HOW DID THIS ENVIRONMENT IMPACT MUNICIPAL BOND SUPPLY AND DEMAND IN MISSOURI?
During the first 11 months of 1999, we saw a steady supply of new municipal
deals, but not enough to overwhelm market demand. Overall, however, municipal
issuance in Missouri was down approximately 40% from 1998 levels. This compared
with a drop in national municipal supply of just over 20%. Some of this decline
was the result of the increase in interest rates, which discouraged
municipalities from issuing long-term debt at higher interest costs. In
addition, the refunding activity involving older debt typically declines in a
rising interest rate environment.
Demand for Missouri paper remained steady, especially from individual investors,
as they actively worked to rebalance their portfolios by redirecting assets from
equity investments into the fixed-income market. Combined with the tighter
supply of municipal bonds in the state, this demand helped to support the prices
of Missouri bonds, although not enough to offset the trends in the national
market.
GIVEN THAT NOM'S PRIMARY OBJECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE STABLE, ATTRACTIVE TAX-EXEMPT
INCOME, WHAT FACTORS AFFECTED THE FUND'S DIVIDEND?
During the past year, good call protection helped support NOM's dividend, while
specific dividend management strategies and the prudent use of leverage
actually enabled us to increase the Fund's dividend in May 1999. As of November
30, 1999, NOM had provided shareholders with 55 consecutive months of steady or
increasing dividends. At the end of November, the market yield on the Fund was a
competitive 5.95%, equivalent to a taxable yield 1 of 9.15% for investors in the
combined 35% federal and state income tax bracket.
As a leveraged fund, NOM issues preferred shares that pay short-term interest
rates to investors seeking short-term liquidity. Short-term municipal rates are
usually (but not always) lower than long-term rates.The proceeds from the
preferred shares are used to buy additional long-term bonds for the Fund's
portfolio. These bonds can generate additional net income for the common
shareholders, but leverage will also increase NAV volatility. When short-term
interest rates remain below long-term rates, common shareholders can potentially
earn extra income from the difference between the rate earned on the Fund's
long-term portfolio and the short-term rate paid to preferred shareholders.
While leveraged funds carry higher risk than non-leveraged funds, they are
compensated for this additional risk in the form of potentially higher yields.
OVERALL, HOW DID NOM PERFORM OVER THE PAST YEAR?
For the 12 months ended November 30, 1999, NOM produced a total return on net
asset value (NAV) of -5.61%, providing a taxable-equivalent total return1 of
- -2.72% for shareholders in the combined 35% federal and state income tax
bracket. By comparison, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index2 posted a
one-year total return of -1.07%, while the Fund's Lipper Peer Group3 had a
one-year total return of -5.11%, as of November 30, 1999.
The underperformance of NOM's total return on NAV relative to its Lehman
benchmark can be attributed largely to the Fund's longer duration4. As of
November 30, 1999, NOM's leverage-adjusted duration was 12.45, compared with the
Lehman Index's 7.50. Duration measures a bond fund's price volatility, or
reaction to interest rate movements. The longer the duration, the more sensitive
the fund's NAV is to changes in interest rates. During a period of falling
interest rates, a long duration enables a fund's NAV to participate more fully
in market gains. However, when interest rates rise, a long duration can make
the fund's NAV more vulnerable to price
1 The taxable-equivalent yield/total return represents the yield/total return
that must be earned on a taxable investment in order to equal the yield/total
return of the Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The taxable-equivalent yield
is based on the fund's current market yield and a combined federal and state
income tax rate of 35%, while the taxable-equivalent total return is based on
the annualized total return and a combined federal and state income tax rate
of 35%.
2 NOM's performance is compared with that of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond
Index, an unleveraged index comprising a broad range of investment-grade
municipal bonds. Results for the index do not reflect any expenses.
3 The total return for NOM is compared with the average annualized return of the
17 funds in the Lipper Other States Closed-End Municipal Debt Funds category.
Fund and Lipper returns assume reinvestment of dividends.
4 Fund duration, also known as leverage-adjusted duration, takes into account
the leveraging process for the fund and therefore differs from the duration of
the actual portfolio of individual bonds that make up the fund. Unless
otherwise noted, references to duration in this commentary are intended to
indicate fund duration.
<PAGE>
declines. For the 12 months beginning December 1998 and ending November 1999,
the yield on the Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index5 rose from 5.25% to 6.14%. This
meant that funds with longer durations, like NOM, were more likely to
underperform the market, as represented by the unleveraged Lehman Brothers
Municipal Bond Index.
Over the past 12 months, NOM's duration lengthened from 9.55, due largely to
market action as bond prices fell. In addition, proceeds from sold or called
bonds were reinvested in issues with longer durations, which also provided the
opportunity to pick up attractive yields and better call protection. The Fund's
longer duration should help position NOM to regain net asset value if the bond
market recovers and interest rates decline.
WHAT ABOUT THE FUND'S SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE?
In 1999, rising interest rates, inflation worries, and constant speculation
about the Federal Reserve's next move created a negative environment in the
fixed-income markets. In addition, concerns about the impact of the transition
to the year 2000 precipitated an early start to tax-swap season, as investors
attempted to offset profits in the equity markets by selling fixed-income
investments at a loss. The markets also had to adjust to liquidity pressures
engendered by Y2K, which prompted some investors to opt for money market funds
and other short-term instruments as the best place to park cash over the year
end.
All of these factors negatively impacted the market demand for exchange-traded
funds such as NOM. This resulted in a decline in the Fund's share price. At the
same time, the bond market's continued downward trend in prices as interest
rates rose led to a decrease in the Fund's NAV. As a result of these factors,
NOM saw its premium (share price above NAV) move to a slight discount (share
price below NAV). The competitive yield offered by NOM, as well as the stability
of its dividend, helped to minimize this shift.
Premium/Discount6 Total Return on Share Price
------------------- ---------------------------
1-Year Ended Taxable-
11/30/98 11/30/99 11/30/99 Equivalent1
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
NOM 4.95% -0.61% -10.72% -7.97%
-------- -------- ------------ -----------
Past performance is not predictive of future results.
For additional information on NOM, see its Performance Overview in this report.
WHAT KEY STRATEGIES WERE USED TO MANAGE NOM DURING THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS
REPORT?
NOM was managed with an emphasis on supporting and strengthening its long-term
dividend-paying capabilities and improving call protection.
With 7% of its portfolio subject to bond calls in 2000 and 2001, NOM provides
excellent levels of protection over the next two years. This should offer
additional protection and stability for the Fund's dividend during this period.
At Nuveen, we continuously work on strategies designed to enhance call
protection, focusing on undervalued bonds that have the potential to support the
Fund's dividend and enhance portfolio structure. These strategies should enable
the Fund to continue providing our shareholders with competitive levels of
dividends.
As of November 30, 1999, NOM offered exceptional credit quality, with 76% of the
Fund's assets invested in bonds rated AAA/U.S. guaranteed and 18% in bonds rated
AA. This overweighting in higher-rated securities gave the Fund the opportunity
to purchase lower-rated credits as they became available in the Missouri
market. Over the past year, we increased our allocation of BBB and non-rated
bonds from 4% to 6%. These lower-rated bonds generally provided enhanced levels
of yield and helped to support the Fund's dividend, especially as credit
spreads (or the difference in yield between higher credit quality securities and
those of lower credit quality) widened in recent months. Nuveen's research
expertise, along with our presence in the municipal market, means that
shareholders can be assured that the creditworthiness of all issuers is
subjected to Nuveen's stringent review process before bonds are purchased for
the Fund's portfolio.
Among the lower-rated issues we added to the Fund during the past six months was
a $1 million purchase of bonds issued by the St. Louis Land Clearance Authority
for the St. Louis Center Parking Garage. These non-rated bonds provided an
above-market yield of 7%, approximately 100 basis points higher than the yield
offered by insured bonds at the time of purchase.
WHAT IS NUVEEN'S OUTLOOK FOR NOM?
We believe that NOM is currently well-positioned for the next phase of the
economic cycle. Given that belief, we plan to work on maintaining the Fund's
positioning, including its duration. We will also continue to emphasize income
by looking for additional purchases that can take advantage of the higher yields
and lower prices currently available in the municipal market, especially in the
lower credit quality sectors. Our Nuveen Research capabilities will help us
explore opportunities in all areas of the market to maintain the Fund's
diversification. The ability to implement strategies with the potential to
benefit the Fund demonstrates the value that Nuveen can add as an active bond
manager knowledgeable about the unique aspects of the Missouri municipal market.
1 The taxable-equivalent total return represents the total return that must be
earned on a taxable investment in order to equal the total return of the
Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The taxable-equivalent total return is
based on the annualized total return and a combined federal and state income
tax rate of 35%.
5 The Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term municipal
revenue bonds.
6 A fund's premium/discount represents the percentage difference between the
fund's share price and its net asset value (NAV).
<PAGE>
Nuveen Missouri Premium Income Municipal Fund
Performance Overview
As of November 30, 1999
NOM
Portfolio Statistics
Inception Date 5/93
- --------------------------------------------------
Share Price $13
- --------------------------------------------------
Net Asset Value $13.08
- --------------------------------------------------
Market Yield 5.95%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield
(Federal Tax Rate)1 8.62%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield
(Federal and State Tax Rate)1 9.15%
- --------------------------------------------------
Fund Net Assets ($000) $44,262
- --------------------------------------------------
Average Effective Maturity (Years) 17.39
- --------------------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Durations 12.45
- --------------------------------------------------
Annualized Total Return
On Share Price On NAV
- --------------------------------------------------
1-Year -10.72% -5.61%
- --------------------------------------------------
5-Year 10.75% 9.85%
- --------------------------------------------------
Since Inception 3.15% 4.19%
- --------------------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Total Return2
On Share Price On NAV
- --------------------------------------------------
1-Year -7.97% -2.72%
- --------------------------------------------------
5-Year 13.92% 12.85%
- --------------------------------------------------
Since Inception 6.12% 7.07%
- --------------------------------------------------
Top Five Sectors (as a % of total investments)
Tax Obligation/General 18%
- --------------------------------------------------
Housing/Multifamily 15%
- --------------------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/Limited 13%
- --------------------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed 11%
- --------------------------------------------------
Water and Sewer 10%
- --------------------------------------------------
Bar Chart:
1998-1999 Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share3
12/98 0.063
1/99 0.063
2/99 0.063
3/99 0.063
4/99 0.063
5/99 0.0645
6/99 0.0645
7/99 0.0645
8/99 0.0645
9/99 0.0645
10/99 0.0645
11/99 0.0645
Line Chart:
Share Price Performance
12/1/98 15.38
15.13
15.31
15.56
15.31
15
14.88
14.5
15.06
14.94
15.13
15.06
15.25
15
15.13
15.13
15.375
15.5
15.38
15.13
14.81
14.88
14.38
14.19
14.25
14.06
14.13
14
14
14
14.06
14.13
14.13
14.06
13.81
13.75
13.69
13.63
13.44
13.5
13.75
13.88
13.5
12.88
13.19
13
13.13
13.13
12.88
11/30/99 13
Weekly Closing Price
Past performance is not predictive of future results.
1 Taxable-equivalent yield represents the yield on a taxable investment
necessary to equal the yield of the Nuveen fund on an after-tax basis. The
federal only rate is based on the current market yield and a federal income
tax rate of 31%. The rate shown for federal and state highlights the added
value of owning shares that are also exempt from state income taxes. It is
based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 35%.
2 Taxable-equivalent total return is based on the annualized total return and a
combined federal and state income tax rate of 35%. It represents the return on
a taxable investment necessary to equal the return of the Nuveen fund on an
after-tax basis.
3 The Fund also paid shareholders net ordinary income distributions in December
1998 of $0.0095 per share.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Portfolio of Investments
NUVEEN CONNECTICUT PREMIUM INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND (NTC)
November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Education and Civic Organizations - 16.5%
Connecticut Higher Education Supplemental Loan Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Family Education Loan Program), 1996 Series A:
$ 1,485,000 5.800%, 11/15/14 (Alternative Minimum Tax) 11/06 at 102 AAA $1,500,964
945,000 5.875%, 11/15/17 (Alternative Minimum Tax) 11/06 at 102 AAA 930,050
900,000 Connecticut Higher Education Supplemental Loan Authority, Revenue 5/00 at 100 AAA 895,941
Bonds (Family Education Loan Program), 1999 Series A, 6.000%, 11/15/18
1,540,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/03 at 102 BBB- 1,444,997
Revenue Bonds, Quinnipiac College Issue, Series D, 6.000%, 7/01/23
2,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/06 at 102 AAA 1,981,280
Revenue Bonds, Trinity College Issue, Series E, 5.875%, 7/01/26
2,040,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/06 at 102 AAA 1,974,190
Revenue Bonds, The Loomis Chaffee School Issue, Series C,
5.500%, 7/01/16
2,250,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/08 at 102 AAA 1,973,025
Revenue Bonds, Fairfield University Issue, Series H, 5.000%, 7/01/23
2,920,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/07 at 102 AAA 2,796,747
Revenue Bonds, Connecticut College Issue, Series C-1, 5.500%, 7/01/20
1,250,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/09 at 101 AAA 1,134,925
Revenue Bonds, Fairfield University, Series I, 5.250%, 7/01/25
3,810,000 The University of Connecticut, Student Fee Revenue Bonds, 11/08 at 101 AAA 3,148,089
1998 Series A, 4.750%, 11/15/27
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Care - 20.7%
1,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/04 at 102 AAA 1,043,720
Revenue Bonds, Newington Children's Hospital, Series A,
6.050%, 7/01/10
1,500,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/03 at 102 AAA 1,311,510
Revenue Bonds, Lawrence and Memorial Hospital Issue, Series D,
5.000%, 7/01/22
2,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, No Opt. Call AAA 2,025,460
Revenue Bonds, Hospital of Saint Raphael Issue, Series H,
5.200%, 7/01/08
2,725,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/02 at 102 AAA 2,751,269
Revenue Bonds, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center Issue,
Series B, 6.200%, 7/01/22
2,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/09 at 101 Aaa 1,734,100
Revenue Bonds, Stamford Hospital Issue, Series G, 5.000%, 7/01/24
2,200,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/06 at 102 AAA 2,016,938
Revenue Bonds, Day Kimball Hospital Issue, Series A, 5.375%, 7/01/26
4,160,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/06 at 102 AAA 4,080,710
Revenue Bonds, Yale-New Haven Hospital Issue, Series H,
5.625%, 7/01/16
1,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/07 at 102 AAA 966,820
Revenue Bonds, The William W. Backus Hospital Issue, Series D,
5.750%, 7/01/27
3,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/07 at 101 Aaa 2,627,220
Revenue Bonds, Middlesex Health Services Issue, Series I,
5.125%, 7/01/27
2,000,000 Connecticut Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Facilities 7/05 at 102 AAA 2,199,940
Revenue Bonds, Pfizer Inc. Project, 1994 Series, 7.000%, 7/01/25
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,500,000 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and 8/05 at 101 1/2 AAA 1,517,175
Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Hospital
Revenue Refunding Bonds, 1995 Series A, FHA-Insured Mortgage
Pila Hospital Project), 6.125%, 8/01/25
<PAGE>
Portfolio of Investments
NUVEEN CONNECTICUT PREMIUM INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND (NTC) (continued)
November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Housing/Multifamily - 6.7%
$ 1,000,000 Connecticut Housing Finance Agency, Housing Mortgage Finance 12/09 at 100 AA $ 992,570
Program Bonds, 1999 Series D, 6.200%, 11/15/41
(Alternative Minimum Tax) (WI)
3,000,000 Housing Authority of the City of Waterbury (Connecticut), Mortgage 1/02 at 100 AAA 2,771,700
Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1998C (FHA-Insured Mortgage
Loan Section 8 Assisted Project), 5.450%, 7/01/23
1,260,000 Waterbury Nonprofit Housing Corporation, Connecticut, Taxable 7/02 at 101 AAA 1,308,875
Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds, FHA-Insured Mortgage
Loan - Fairmont Height Section 8 Assisted Project, Series 1993A,
6.500%, 7/01/07
1,930,000 Housing Authority of the City of Willimantic, Multifamily Housing 10/05 at 105 AAA 2,136,800
Revenue Bonds, Series 1995A, GNMA Collateralized Mortgage
Loan - Village Heights Apartments Project, 8.000%, 10/20/30
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Housing/Single Family - 5.2%
3,175,000 Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, Housing Mortgage Finance 5/03 at 102 AA 3,248,470
Program, Series B, 6.200%, 5/15/12
2,345,000 Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, Housing Mortgage Finance 11/06 at 102 AA 2,344,906
Program Bonds, 1996 Subseries E-2, 6.150%, 11/15/27
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Care - 7.2%
1,300,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 8/08 at 102 AAA 1,105,169
Revenue Bonds, Hebrew Home and Hospital Issue, Series B
(FHA-Insured Mortgage), 5.200%, 8/01/38
2,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 11/03 at 102 AAA 2,045,960
Revenue Bonds, Nursing Home Program Issue, Series 1993,
Mansfield Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation Project,
5.875%, 11/01/12
615,000 Connecticut Development Authority, First Mortgage Gross Revenue 9/09 at 102 AA 588,407
Health Care Project Refunding Bonds (Connecticut Baptist
Homes, Inc. Project), 1999 Series, 5.500%, 9/01/15
Connecticut Development Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Duncaster Inc. Project), Series 1999A:
1,000,000 5.250%, 8/01/19 2/10 at 102 AA 908,090
1,000,000 5.375%, 8/01/24 2/10 at 102 AA 901,590
Connecticut Development Authority, Health Facility Refunding
Revenue Bonds, Alzheimer's Resource Center of Connecticut, Inc.
Project, Series 1994A:
1,100,000 6.875%, 8/15/04 No Opt. Call N/R 1,117,820
1,000,000 7.000%, 8/15/09 8/04 at 102 N/R 1,022,510
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/General - 9.8%
Town of Cheshire, Connecticut, General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 1999:
660,000 5.625%, 10/15/16 10/09 at 101 Aa3 657,815
660,000 5.625%, 10/15/17 10/09 at 101 Aa3 654,080
1,000,000 State of Connecticut, General Obligation Bonds, 1999 Series B, 11/09 at 101 AA 973,030
5.500%, 11/01/18
2,000,000 State of Connecticut, General Obligation Bonds, 1993 Series E, No Opt. Call AA 2,142,860
6.000%, 3/15/12
1,650,000 State of Connecticut, General Fund Obligation Bonds, 1994 Series A, 10/04 at 102 AA 1,743,192
Issued By Connecticut Development Authority, 6.375%, 10/15/14
3,500,000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement Bonds of 1998 7/08 at 101 AAA 3,040,065
(General Obligation Bonds), 4.875%, 7/01/23
1,250,000 City of Waterbury, Connecticut, General Obligation Tax Revenue 4/03 at 102 AAA 1,268,550
Intercept Refunding Bonds, 1993 Issue, 5.375%, 4/15/08
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/Limited - 6.4%
1,900,000 Capitol Region Education Council Bonds, 6.700%, 10/15/10 10/05 at 102 BBB 1,982,327
2,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/09 at 102 AAA 1,908,580
Revenue Bonds, Child Care Facilities Program, Series C,
5.625%, 7/01/29
1,000,000 State of Connecticut, Special Tax Obligation Bonds, Transportation 12/09 at 101 AAA 976,550
Infrastructure Purposes, 1999 Series A, 5.625%, 12/01/19 (WI)
1,800,000 State of Connecticut, Special Tax Obligation Bonds, Transportation No Opt. Call AA- 2,000,520
Infrastructure Purposes, 1991 Series B, 6.500%, 10/01/10
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Transportation - 4.6%
$ 3,000,000 State of Connecticut, Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds, Bradley 10/04 at 100 AAA $3,364,680
International Airport, Series 1992, 7.650%, 10/01/12
1,500,000 City of New Haven, Connecticut, Air Rights Parking Facility 12/01 at 102 AAA 1,582,365
Revenue Bonds, Series 1991, 6.500%, 12/01/15
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed - 11.8%
State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sacred Heart University Issue, Series
B:
2,600,000 5.700%, 7/01/16 (Pre-refunded to 7/01/03) 7/03 at 102 BBB-*** 2,738,944
1,000,000 5.800%, 7/01/23 (Pre-refunded to 7/01/03) 7/03 at 102 BBB-*** 1,056,710
2,020,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/02 at 102 AAA 2,136,493
Revenue Bonds, Trinity College Issue, Series C, 6.000%, 7/01/22
(Pre-refunded to 7/01/02)
2,910,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/03 at 102 BBB-*** 3,094,087
Revenue Bonds, Quinnipiac College Issue Series D,
6.000%, 7/01/23 (Pre-refunded to 7/01/03)
2,000,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 11/04 at 102 AA-*** 2,243,960
Revenue Bonds, Nursing Home Program Issue, Series 1994,
AHF/Hartford, Inc. Project, 7.125%, 11/01/24 (Pre-refunded to 11/01/04)
1,250,000 State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/04 at 101 AAA 1,382,575
Revenue Bonds, Choate Rosemary Hall Issue, Series A,
7.000%, 7/01/25 (Pre-refunded to 7/01/04)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Utilities - 5.6%
3,250,000 Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, Power Supply 1/04 at 102 AAA 2,935,628
System Revenue Bonds, 1993 Series A, 5.000%, 1/01/18
2,955,000 Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, Resource Recovery 11/03 at 100 1/2 AA 3,037,533
Revenue Bonds, American Ref-Fuel Company of Southeastern
Connecticut Project, 1989 Series A, 7.700%, 11/15/11
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Water and Sewer - 5.6%
2,795,000 Connecticut Development Authority, Water Facilities Revenue Bonds, 6/03 at 102 AAA 2,610,083
Bridgeport Hydraulic Company Project, 1993 A Series,
5.600%, 6/01/28 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,400,000 Connecticut Development Authority, Water Facilities Refunding 6/03 at 102 AAA 1,313,661
Revenue Bonds, Bridgeport Hydraulic Company Project),
1993B Series, 5.500%, 6/01/28
2,000,000 South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority, Water System 8/03 at 102 AAA 2,045,860
Revenue Bonds, Eleventh Series, 5.750%, 8/01/12
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 109,050,000 Total Investments - (cost $108,159,542) - 100.1% 107,438,085
=============
Other Assets Less Liabilities - (0.1)% (142,794)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets - 100% $107,295,291
====================================================================================================================
* Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and
prices of the earliest optional call or redemption.
There may be other call provisions at varying prices at
later dates.
** Ratings: Using the higher of Standard & Poor's or
Moody's rating.
*** Securities are backed by an escrow or trust containing
sufficient U.S. government or U.S. government agency
securities which ensures the timely payment of
principal and interest. Securities are normally
considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities.
N/R Investment is not rated.
(WI) Security purchased on a when-issued basis (note 1).
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Portfolio of Investments
NUVEEN MASSACHUSETTS PREMIUM INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND (NMT)
November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Education and Civic Organizations - 19.1%
$ 720,000 Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan 7/04 at 102 AAA $ 744,120
Revenue Bonds, Issue E, Series 1995, 6.150%, 7/01/10
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,970,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue 6/03 at 102 AAA 1,790,868
Bonds (Boston College Issue), Series K, 5.250%, 6/01/23
1,500,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 3/06 at 102 AAA 1,433,745
(College of the Holy Cross - 1996 Issue), 5.500%, 3/01/20
2,645,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 7/03 at 102 Aa1 2,328,420
(Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research - 1993 Issue),
5.125%, 7/01/26
3,500,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 9/08 at 102 Aaa 3,206,000
(Phillips Academy Issue), Series 1993, 5.375%, 9/01/23
3,300,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Education Revenue 9/08 at 101 A 2,875,455
Bonds (Belmont Hill School Issue) Series 1998, 5.250%, 9/01/28
1,765,000 The New England Education Loan Marketing Corporation, No Opt. Call A3 1,841,954
Student Loan Revenue Bonds, 1992 Subordinated Issue C,
6.750%, 9/01/02 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
4,000,000 The New England Loan Marketing Corporation, Student Loan No Opt. Call A3 4,313,720
Revenue Bonds, 1992 Subordinated Issue H, 6.900%, 11/01/09
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Care - 16.9%
4,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/04 at 102 AAA 3,644,680
Revenue Bonds (New England Medical Center Hospitals Issue),
Series G-1, 5.375%, 7/01/24
2,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/04 at 102 AA+ 2,125,560
Revenue Bonds (Daughters of Charity National Health
System - The Carney Hospital), Series D, 6.100%, 7/01/14
1,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/00 at 100 AAA 999,100
Revenue Bonds (Massachusetts General Hospital Issue),
Series G, 5.375%, 7/01/11
3,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/03 at 102 AAA 2,947,950
Revenue Bonds (Lahey Clinic Medical Center Issue), Series B,
5.625%, 7/01/15
200,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 1/00 at 102 1/2 N/R 202,210
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Cardinal Cushing General Hospital),
Series 1989-A, 8.500%, 7/01/00
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Youville Hospital Issue FHA-Insured
Project), Series B:
2,220,000 6.125%, 2/15/15 2/04 at 102 Aa2 2,235,673
1,000,000 6.000%, 2/15/25 2/04 at 102 Aa2 983,940
2,805,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/08 at 102 AAA 2,396,480
Revenue Bonds (Caregroup Issue), Series A, 5.000%, 7/01/25
1,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 7/08 at 101 AAA 824,440
Revenue Bonds (Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Issue), Series A,
4.750%, 7/01/22
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Housing/Multifamily - 10.2%
3,800,000 Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Housing Project 4/03 at 102 A+ 3,908,566
Revenue Bonds, 6.300%, 10/01/13
1,000,000 Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Housing Development Bonds, 6/08 at 101 AAA 930,150
1998 Series A, 5.375%, 6/01/16 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
3,315,000 Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Rental Housing Mortgage 7/07 at 101 AAA 3,024,076
Revenue Bonds, 1997 Series C, 5.625%, 7/01/40
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,925,000 Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Rental Housing Mortgage 1/05 at 102 AAA 2,052,724
Revenue Bonds, 1995 Series A (FHA-Insured Mortgage Loans),
7.350%, 1/01/35 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Long-Term Care - 6.0%
$ 1,270,000 City of Boston, Massachusetts, Revenue Bonds (Deutsches 10/08 at 105 AAA $1,259,142
Altenheim, Incorporated Project - FHA-Insured Mortgage),
Series 1998A, 6.125%, 10/01/31
2,000,000 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 8/09 at 101 A 1,978,320
(Northern Berkshire Community Services, Inc. Issue),
1999 Series A, 6.250%, 8/15/25
1,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 2/07 at 102 Aa2 1,000,090
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Youville Hospital Issue FHA-Insured
Project), Series A, 6.250%, 2/15/41
1,095,000 Massachusetts Industrial Financial Agency, Revenue Bonds 2/06 at 102 AAA 1,101,209
(Heights Crossing Limited Partnership Issue FHA-Insured Project),
Series 1995, 6.000%, 2/01/15 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
500,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 8/07 at 105 AAA 503,250
(Briscoe House Assisted Living Issue FHA-Insured Project),
6.050%, 2/01/17 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/General - 7.8%
Town of Barnstable, Massachusetts, General Obligation Bonds:
1,020,000 5.750%, 9/15/10 9/04 at 102 AA 1,056,088
1,020,000 5.750%, 9/15/11 9/04 at 102 AA 1,050,192
965,000 5.750%, 9/15/12 9/04 at 102 AA 980,884
4,375,000 City of Lowell, Massachusetts, General Obligation State Qualified 11/03 at 102 AAA 4,432,969
Bonds, 5.600%, 11/01/12
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation - 7.7%
1,300,000 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 6/09 at 101 AA 1,257,139
(Worcester Redevelopment Authority Issue), Series 1999,
6.000%, 6/01/24
4,000,000 Massachusetts Port Authority, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds 9/06 at 102 AAA 3,955,120
(US Air Project) Series 1996-A, 5.750%, 9/01/16
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
2,400,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Parking Facility Revenue 4/03 at 102 AAA 2,258,448
Bonds (Avon Associates LLC Project), Series 1998A, 5.375%, 4/01/20
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed - 20.7%
2,500,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, No Opt. Call AAA 2,419,100
Revenue Bonds (Malden Hospital Issue FHA-Insured Project),
Series A, 5.000%, 8/01/16
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
Revenue Bonds (New England Deaconess Hospital Issue), Series D:
3,310,000 6.625%, 4/01/12 (Pre-refunded to 4/01/02) 4/02 at 102 AAA 3,530,214
1,000,000 6.875%, 4/01/22 (Pre-refunded to 4/01/02) 4/02 at 102 AAA 1,071,790
1,000,000 Massachusetts Port Authority, Revenue Bonds, Series 1982, No Opt. Call AAA 1,562,280
13.000%, 7/01/13
2,500,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue Refunding Bonds 11/02 at 102 AA-*** 2,676,750
(College of the Holy Cross - 1992 Issue II), 6.375%, 11/01/15
(Pre-refunded to 11/01/02)
1,250,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 7/02 at 102 AAA 1,354,525
(Merrimack College Issue), Series 1992, 7.125%, 7/01/12
(Pre-refunded to 7/01/02)
1,175,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds 7/03 at 102 A3*** 1,247,404
(Brooks School Issue), Series 1993, 5.950%, 7/01/23
(Pre-refunded to 7/01/03)
3,000,000 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, General Revenue 12/01 at 100 Aaa 3,086,400
Bonds, 1991 Series A, 5.750%, 12/01/21 (Pre-refunded to 12/01/01)
3,000,000 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds, Series P, 7/01 at 102 Aaa 3,190,080
7.000%, 7/01/21 (Pre-refunded to 7/01/01)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Utilities - 7.5%
2,000,000 Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company, 7/02 at 100 AAA 2,008,640
Power Supply System Revenue Bonds, 1992 Series A,
6.000%, 7/01/18
3,260,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Resource Recovery 7/01 at 103 N/R 3,503,356
Revenue Bonds, Semass Project, 1991B, 9.250%, 7/01/15
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
2,000,000 Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Resource Recovery 12/08 at 102 BBB 1,759,500
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Ogden Haverhill Project),
Series 1998A, 5.600%, 12/01/19 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
<PAGE>
Portfolio of Investments
NUVEEN MASSACHUSETTS PREMIUM INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND (NMT) (continued)
November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Water and Sewer - 2.7%
$ 3,000,000 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, General Revenue 3/03 at 100 A+ $2,599,170
Refunding Bonds, 1993 Series B, 5.000%, 3/01/22
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 96,605,000 Total Investments - (cost $95,291,171) - 98.6% 95,651,891
=============
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 1.4% 1,336,502
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets - 100% $96,988,393
====================================================================================================================
* Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and
prices of the earliest optional call or redemption.
There may be other call provisions at varying prices at
later dates.
** Ratings: Using the higher of Standard & Poor's or
Moody's rating.
*** Securities are backed by an escrow or trust containing
sufficient U.S. government or U.S. government agency
securities which ensures the timely payment of
principal and interest. Securities are normally
considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities.
N/R Investment is not rated.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Portfolio of Investments
NUVEEN MISSOURI PREMIUM INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND (NOM)
November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consumer Staples - 2.0%
$ 1,000,000 Missouri State Development Finance Board, Solid Waste Disposal No Opt. Call AA $ 871,750
Revenue Bonds (Procter and Gamble Paper Products Company
Project), Series 1999, 5.200%, 3/15/29 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Education and Civic Organizations - 5.1%
500,000 The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Kansas City, 4/07 at 100 AAA 476,955
Missouri (Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Project),
Fixed Rate Revenue Bonds, Series 1997B, 5.700%, 4/01/27
2,165,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, 11/08 at 101 AA+ 1,802,363
Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (The Washington
University), Series 1998A, 5.000%, 11/15/37
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Care - 9.5%
1,000,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, 6/02 at 102 AAA 1,056,680
Health Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (SSM Health Care),
Series 1992AA, 6.250%, 6/01/07
1,000,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, No Opt. Call AA 1,126,580
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds (BJC Health System),
Series 1994A, 6.750%, 5/15/12
325,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, 2/06 at 102 BBB+ 322,927
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds (Lake of the Ozarks General
Hospital Inc.), Series 1996, 6.500%, 2/15/21
400,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, 5/08 at 101 AA 336,892
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds (BJC Health System),
Series 1998, 5.000%, 5/15/28
1,000,000 Ray County, Missouri, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Ray County 5/05 at 101 1/2 N/R 924,160
Memorial Hospital), Series 1997, 5.750%, 11/15/12
500,000 The Industrial Development Authority of the City of West Plains, 11/07 at 101 N/R 418,740
Missouri, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds (Ozark Medical Center),
Series 1997, 5.600%, 11/15/17
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Housing/Multifamily - 14.2%
1,550,000 Missouri Housing Development Commission, Multifamily Housing 12/06 at 102 AAA 1,537,027
Revenue Bonds (Brookstone Village Apartments Project),
1996 Series A, 6.100%, 12/01/21 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,250,000 The Industrial Development Authority of St. Charles County, Missouri, 4/08 at 102 AAA 1,159,113
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Ashwood Apartments Project),
Series 1998A, 5.600%, 4/01/30 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,045,000 The Industrial Development Authority of the County of St. Louis, 4/07 at 102 AAA 1,044,916
Missouri, Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds
(GNMA Collateralized - South Summit Apartments Project),
Series 1997A, 5.950%, 4/20/17
600,000 The Industrial Development Authority of the County of St. Louis, 4/07 at 102 AAA 601,236
Missouri, Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds
(GNMA Collateralized - South Summit Apartments Project),
Series 1997B, 6.000%, 10/20/15 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
750,000 The Industrial Development Authority of the County of St. Louis, 8/08 at 102 AAA 690,668
Missouri, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (GNMA
Collateralized - Glen Trails West Apartments Project),
Series 1999B, 5.700%, 8/20/39 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,250,000 The Industrial Development Authority of University City, Missouri, 12/05 at 102 AAA 1,232,175
Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (GNMA
Collateralized - Canterbury Gardens Project), Series 1995A,
5.900%, 12/20/20
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Housing/Single Family - 7.2%
1,460,000 Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage 3/06 at 105 AAA 1,566,390
Revenue Bonds (Homeownership Loan Program),
1995 Series C, 7.250%, 9/01/26 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,570,000 Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family 2/01 at 102 AAA 1,617,163
Mortgage Revenue Bonds (GNMA Mortgage-Back Securities
Program), 1991 Series A, 7.375%, 8/01/23 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
<PAGE>
Portfolio of Investments
NUVEEN MISSOURI PREMIUM INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND (NOM) (continued)
November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tax Obligation/General - 17.0%
$ 2,020,000 Ritenour School District of St. Louis County, Missouri, No Opt. Call AAA $2,376,934
General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1995, 7.375%, 2/01/12
1,500,000 Francis Howell School District, St. Charles County, Missouri, General No Opt. Call AAA 1,745,040
Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1994A, 7.800%, 3/01/08
1,000,000 School District of the City of St. Charles, Missouri, General 3/06 at 100 AA+ 1,009,340
Obligation Bonds (Missouri Direct Deposit Program), Series 1996A,
5.625%, 3/01/14
1,395,000 The Board of Education of the City of St. Louis (Missouri), General No Opt. Call AAA 1,693,056
Obligation School Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A, 8.500%, 4/01/07
625,000 Reorganized School District No. R-IV of Stone County, Missouri No Opt. Call AAA 746,381
(Reeds Spring, Missouri), General Obligation School Building
Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 1995, 7.600%, 3/01/10
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/Limited - 12.1%
1,000,000 Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority, Kansas City, 12/05 at 102 AAA 1,002,020
Missouri, Lease Revenue Bonds (Municipal Auditorium and
Muehlebach Hotel Redevelopment Project), Series 1995A,
5.900%, 12/01/18
1,000,000 Kansas City Municipal Assistance Corporation, Leasehold Revenue 1/06 at 101 AAA 1,017,940
Capital Improvement Bonds (Kansas City, Missouri, Lessee),
Series 1996B, 5.700%, 1/15/13
Monarch-Chesterfield Levee District (St. Louis County, Missouri),
Levee District Improvement Bonds, Series 1999:
500,000 5.450%, 3/01/14 3/10 at 101 AAA 497,505
1,000,000 5.750%, 3/01/19 3/10 at 101 AAA 991,280
1,800,000 St. Louis Municipal Finance Corporation, City Justice Center, 2/06 at 102 AAA 1,863,486
Leasehold Revenue Improvement Bonds, Series 1996A (City of
St. Louis, Missouri, Lessee), 5.750%, 2/15/11
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation - 8.3%
1,500,000 City of Kansas City, Missouri, General Improvement Airport 9/04 at 101 AAA 1,626,975
Revenue Bonds, Series 1994A, 6.900%, 9/01/11
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,000,000 The City of St. Louis, Missouri, Airport Revenue Bonds, No Opt. Call AAA 1,044,470
Series 1997B (1997 Capital Improvement Program), Lambert-
St. Louis International Airport, 6.000%, 7/01/12
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,000,000 Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of the City of 9/09 at 102 N/R 1,007,410
St. Louis (Missouri), Tax Exempt Parking Facility Revenue Refunding
and Improvement Bonds, Series of 1999C (Parking Facilities Project),
7.000%, 9/01/29
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed - 10.5%
675,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, 2/06 at 102 BBB+*** 738,909
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds (Lake of the Ozarks General
Hospital Inc.), Series 1996, 6.500%, 2/15/21 (Pre-refunded to 2/15/06)
1,290,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, 6/00 at 102 AAA 1,336,118
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds (SSM Health Care Obligated
Group Projects), Series 1990B, 7.000%, 6/01/15
1,250,000 Certificates of Receipt, St. Louis County, Missouri, GNMA No Opt. Call AAA 1,210,212
Collateralized Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1993,
5.650%, 7/01/20 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,275,000 St. Louis Municipal Finance Corporation, Leasehold Revenue 2/05 at 100 AAA 1,364,951
Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 1992 (City of St. Louis,
Missouri, Lessee), 6.250%, 2/15/12 (Pre-refunded to 2/15/05)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Water and Sewer - 10.1%
1,225,000 State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority 1/05 at 102 Aa1 1,395,995
(State of Missouri), Water Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (State
Revolving Fund Program - City of Kansas City Project), Series 1995B,
7.750%, 1/01/08
1,000,000 State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority 7/04 at 102 AAA 1,019,430
(State of Missouri), Water Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
(State Revolving Fund Program - City of Branson Project),
Series 1995A, 6.050%, 7/01/16
750,000 State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority 1/06 at 101 Aa1 761,520
(State of Missouri), Water Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
(State Revolving Fund Program - Multiple Participant Series),
Series 1996D, 5.875%, 1/01/15
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Principal Optional Call Market
Amount Description Provisions* Ratings** Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Water and Sewer (continued)
$ 350,000 State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority No Opt. Call Aa1 $ 395,350
(State of Missouri), Water Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
(State Revolving Fund Program - City of Kansas City Project),
Series 1997C, 6.750%, 1/01/12
1,000,000 Public Water Supply District No. 2 of St. Charles County, 12/09 at 100 Aaa 881,650
Missouri, Insured Certificates of Participation, Series 1999B,
5.100%, 12/01/25
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 41,520,000 Total Investments - (cost $42,531,586) - 96.0% 42,511,707
=============
Short-Term Investments - 2.7%
400,000 The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Independence, A-1+ 400,000
Missouri, Variable Rate Demand Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds (The Groves and Graceland College Nursing Arts Center
Projects), Series 1997A, 3.700%, 11/01/27+
300,000 Health and Education Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri, VMIG-1 300,000
Variable Rate Demand Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Drury College), Series 1996A, 3.750%, 8/15/21+
500,000 Health and Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri VMIG-1 500,000
(St. Louis University), Series 1999B, Variable Rate Demand Bonds,
3.750%, 10/01/24+
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 1,200,000 Total Short-Term Investments - (cost $1,200,000) 1,200,000
=============
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 1.3% 549,933
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets - 100% $ 44,261,640
====================================================================================================================
* Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and
prices of the earliest optional call or redemption.
There may be other call provisions at varying prices at
later dates.
** Ratings: Using the higher of Standard & Poor's or
Moody's rating.
*** Securities are backed by an escrow or trust containing
sufficient U.S. government or U.S. government agency
securities which ensures the timely payment of
principal and interest. Securities are normally
considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities.
N/R Investment is not rated.
+ Security has a maturity of more than one year, but has
variable rate and demand features which qualify it as a
short-term security. The rate disclosed is that
currently in effect. This rate changes periodically
based on market conditions or a specified market index.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Statement of Net Assets
November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Assets
Investments in municipal securities, at market value (note 1) $107,438,085 $95,651,891 $42,511,707
Temporary investments in short-term municipal securities,
at amortized cost, which approximates market value (note 1) -- -- 1,200,000
Cash 473,842 -- --
Receivables:
Interest 1,852,450 1,796,620 745,524
Investments sold -- 50,000 25,453
Other assets 11,869 10,269 7,438
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets 109,776,246 97,508,780 44,490,122
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liabilities
Cash overdraft -- 74,641 18,286
Payable for investments purchased 1,995,128 -- --
Accrued expenses:
Management fees (note 6) 57,300 51,751 23,629
Other 59,228 55,239 36,242
Preferred share dividends payable 14,532 11,181 10,957
Common share dividends payable 354,767 327,575 139,368
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 2,480,955 520,387 228,482
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets (note 7) $107,295,291 $96,988,393 $44,261,640
====================================================================================================================================
Preferred shares, at liquidation value $ 38,300,000 $34,000,000 $16,000,000
====================================================================================================================================
Preferred shares outstanding 1,532 1,360 640
====================================================================================================================================
Common shares outstanding 5,218,068 4,647,152 2,161,020
====================================================================================================================================
Net asset value per Common share outstanding (net assets less Preferred shares
at liquidation value, divided by Common shares
outstanding) $ 13.22 $ 13.55 $ 13.08
====================================================================================================================================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Statement of Operations
Six Months Ended November 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Investment Income (note 1) $ 3,114,016 $ 2,855,492 $ 1,275,247
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses
Management fees (note 6) 356,157 320,897 146,636
Preferred shares - auction fees 48,006 42,617 20,055
Preferred shares - dividend disbursing agent fees 5,014 5,014 5,014
Shareholders' servicing agent fees and expenses 7,840 4,041 3,477
Custodian's fees and expenses 30,671 19,829 18,890
Trustees' fees and expenses (note 6) 536 487 223
Professional fees 8,659 8,647 8,570
Shareholders' reports - printing and mailing expenses 15,399 17,519 9,777
Stock exchange listing fees 8,147 8,131 1,001
Investor relations expense 5,078 4,343 2,200
Other expenses 3,657 3,500 2,770
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total expenses before custodian fee credit 489,164 435,025 218,613
Custodian fee credit (note 1) (11,292) (1,027) (2,959)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net expenses 477,872 433,998 215,654
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net investment income 2,636,144 2,421,494 1,059,593
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Investments
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions (notes 1 and 4) (218,161) (213,617) 5,252
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments (6,146,118) (5,217,984) (2,386,969)
Net gain (loss) from investments (6,364,279) (5,431,601) (2,381,717)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations $(3,728,135) $(3,010,107) $(1,322,124)
===================================================================================================================================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
(Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six Months Ended Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
11/30/99 5/31/99 11/30/99 5/31/99 11/30/99 5/31/99
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operations
Net investment income $ 2,636,144 $ 5,211,308 $ 2,421,494 $ 4,778,515 $ 1,059,593 $ 2,097,882
Net realized gain (loss)
from investment
transactions (notes 1 and 4) (218,161) 179,160 (213,617) 62,570 5,252 144,162
Change in net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)
of investments (6,146,118) (546,826) (5,217,984) (862,463) (2,386,969) (635,348)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in
net assets
from operations (3,728,135) 4,843,642 (3,010,107) 3,978,622 (1,322,124) 1,606,696
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions to Shareholders (note 1)
From undistributed net
investment income:
Common shareholders (2,126,809) (4,152,776) (1,964,435) (3,943,214) (835,247) (1,643,003)
Preferred shareholders (513,244) (1,019,710) (440,302) (935,926) (275,395) (477,251)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decrease in net assets from
distributions to shareholders (2,640,053) (5,172,486) (2,404,737) (4,879,140) (1,110,642) (2,120,254)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital Share Transactions (note 2)
Net proceeds from Common shares
issued to shareholders due
to reinvestment of distributions 198,700 409,551 115,162 252,623 91,801 180,843
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease)
in net assets (6,169,488) 80,707 (5,299,682) (647,895) (2,340,965) (332,715)
Net assets at the beginning
of period 113,464,779 113,384,072 102,288,075 102,935,970 46,602,605 46,935,320
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets at the end of period $107,295,291 $113,464,779 $ 96,988,393 $102,288,075 $ 44,261,640 $46,602,605
===================================================================================================================================
Balance of undistributed net
investment income at the
end of period $ 319,016 $ 322,925 $ 130,360 $ 113,603 $ 83,461 $ 134,510
===================================================================================================================================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. General Information and Significant Accounting Policies
The state Funds (the "Funds") covered in this report and their corresponding
stock exchange symbols are Nuveen Connecticut Premium Income Municipal Fund
(NTC), Nuveen Massachusetts Premium Income Municipal Fund (NMT) and Nuveen
Missouri Premium Income Municipal Fund (NOM). Connecticut and Massachusetts are
traded on the New York Stock Exchange while Missouri is traded on the American
Stock Exchange.
Each Fund invests primarily in a diversified portfolio of municipal obligations
issued by state and local government authorities within a single state. The
Funds are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as closed-end,
diversified management investment companies.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the
Funds in the preparation of their financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Securities Valuation
The prices of municipal bonds in each Fund's investment portfolio are provided
by a pricing service approved by the Fund's Board of Trustees. When price quotes
are not readily available (which is usually the case for municipal securities),
the pricing service establishes fair market value based on yields or prices of
municipal bonds of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and
rating, indications of value from securities dealers and general market
conditions. Temporary investments in securities that have variable rate and
demand features qualifying them as short-term securities are valued at amortized
cost, which approximates market value.
Securities Transactions
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and
losses from such transactions are determined on the specific identification
method. Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis
may have extended settlement periods. The securities so purchased are subject to
market fluctuation during this period. The Funds have instructed the custodian
to segregate assets in a separate account with a current value at least equal to
the amount of the when-issued and delayed delivery purchase commitments. At
November 30, 1999, Connecticut had outstanding when-issued purchase commitments
of $1,995,128. There were no such outstanding purchase commitments in either of
the other Funds.
Investment Income
Interest income is determined on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on long-term debt securities
when required for federal income tax purposes.
Income Taxes
Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund
intends to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable
to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its tax-exempt net
investment income, in addition to any significant amounts of net realized
capital gains and/or market discount realized from investment transactions. The
Funds currently consider significant net realized capital gains and/or market
discount as amounts in excess of $.01 per Common share. Furthermore, each Fund
intends to satisfy conditions which will enable interest from municipal
securities, which is exempt from regular federal and designated state income
taxes, if any, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to shareholders
of the Funds. Net realized capital gain and market discount distributions are
subject to federal taxation.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders
Tax-exempt net investment income is declared monthly as a dividend and payment
is made or reinvestment is credited to shareholder accounts on the first
business day after month-end. Net realized capital gains and/or market discount
from investment transactions, if any, are distributed to shareholders not less
frequently than annually. Furthermore, capital gains are distributed only to the
extent they exceed available capital loss carryforwards.
Distributions to shareholders of tax-exempt net investment income, net realized
capital gains and/or market discount are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The
amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with federal
income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting
principles. Accordingly, temporary over-distributions as a result of these
differences may occur and will be classified as either distributions in excess
of net investment income, distributions in excess of net realized gains and/or
distributions in excess of net ordinary taxable income from investment
transactions, where applicable.
<PAGE>
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
Preferred Shares
The Funds have issued and outstanding $25,000 stated value Preferred shares.
Each Fund's Preferred shares are issued in one Series. The dividend rate on each
Series may change every seven days, as set by the auction agent. The number of
shares outstanding for each Fund is as follows:
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Shares:
Series Th 1,532 1,360 640
================================================================================
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Funds may invest in transactions in certain derivative financial instruments
including futures, forward, swap and option contracts, and other financial
instruments with similar characteristics. Although the Funds are authorized to
invest in such financial instruments, and may do so in the future, they did not
make any such investments during the six months ended November 30, 1999.
Custodian Fee Credit
Each Fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby the custodian fees
and expenses are reduced by credits earned on each Fund's cash on deposit with
the bank. Such deposit arrangements are an alternative to overnight investments.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net
assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results may differ
from those estimates.
2. Fund Shares
Transactions in Common shares were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Connecticut Massachusetts
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six Months Ended Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
11/30/99 5/31/99 11/30/99 5/31/99
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Shares issued to shareholders
due to reinvestment of
distributions 12,503 25,373 7,365 15,263
================================================================================================================
<CAPTION>
Missouri
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six Months Ended Year Ended
11/30/99 5/31/99
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Shares issued to shareholders
due to reinvestment of
distributions 6,631 11,929
================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
3. Distributions to Common Shareholders
The Funds declared Common share dividend distributions from their tax-exempt net
investment income which were paid on December 23, 1999, to shareholders of
record on December 15, 1999, as follows:
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dividend per share $.0680 $.0705 $.0645
================================================================================
<PAGE>
4. Securities Transactions
Purchases and sales (including maturities) of investments in long-term municipal
securities and short-term municipal securities for the six months ended November
30, 1999, were as follows:
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purchases:
Long-term municipal securities $13,721,665 $3,309,508 $3,233,750
Short-term municipal securities 4,400,000 -- 4,100,000
Sales and maturities:
Long-term municipal securities 10,999,470 2,446,203 4,031,233
Short-term municipal securities 4,400,000 -- 2,900,000
================================================================================
At November 30, 1999, the identified cost of investments owned for federal
income tax purposes were as follows:
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$108,159,542 $95,291,171 $43,731,586
================================================================================
At May 31, 1999, the Funds' last fiscal year end, the Funds had unused capital
loss carryforwards available for federal income tax purposes to be applied
against future capital gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will
expire as follows:
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiration year:
2003 $ 715,734 $ 552,941 $ 804,913
2004 1,105,901 945,779 708,417
2005 847,914 195,761 --
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $2,669,549 $1,694,481 $1,513,330
================================================================================
5. Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
Gross unrealized appreciation and gross unrealized depreciation of investments
at November 30, 1999, were as follows:
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross unrealized:
appreciation $ 2,352,941 $ 2,544,219 $ 923,840
depreciation (3,074,398) (2,183,499) (943,719)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) $ (721,457) $ 360,720 $ (19,879)
================================================================================
6. Management Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Under the Funds' investment management agreements with Nuveen Advisory Corp.
(the "Adviser"), a wholly owned subsidiary of The John Nuveen Company, each Fund
pays an annual management fee, payable monthly, at the rates set forth below,
which are based upon the average daily net assets of each Fund as follows:
Average Daily Net Assets Management Fee
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the first $125 million .6500 of 1%
For the next $125 million .6375 of 1
For the next $250 million .6250 of 1
For the next $500 million .6125 of 1
For the next $1 billion .6000 of 1
For net assets over $2 billion .5875 of 1
================================================================================
The fee compensates the Adviser for overall investment advisory and
administrative services and general office facilities. The Funds pay no
compensation directly to those of its Trustees who are affiliated with the
Adviser or to their officers, all of whom receive remuneration for their
services to the Funds from the Adviser.
<PAGE>
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
7. Composition of Net Assets
At November 30, 1999, net assets consisted of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Connecticut Massachusetts Missouri
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Preferred shares, $25,000 stated value per share,
at liquidation value $ 38,300,000 $34,000,000 $16,000,000
Common shares, $.01 par value per share 52,181 46,472 21,610
Paid-in surplus 72,233,261 64,358,939 29,684,526
Balance of undistributed net investment income 319,016 130,360 83,461
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions (2,887,710) (1,908,098) (1,508,078)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments (721,457) 360,720 (19,879)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets $107,295,291 $96,988,393 $44,261,640
===========================================================================================================
Authorized shares:
Common Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Preferred Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
===========================================================================================================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Financial Highlights
(Unaudited)
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
<CAPTION>
Investment Operations
----------------------------------
Net
Realized/
Beginning Net Unrealized
Net Asset Investment Investment
Value Income Gain (Loss) Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Connecticut
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) $14.44 $ .51 $(1.22) $ (.71)
1999 14.49 1.00 (.05) .95
1998 13.63 1.00 .89 1.89
1997 12.99 1.00 .60 1.60
1996 13.20 .98 (.21) .77
1995 12.45 .98 .74 1.72
<CAPTION>
Massachusetts
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 14.72 .52 (1.18) (.66)
1999 14.91 1.02 (.16) .86
1998 14.11 1.06 .83 1.89
1997 13.58 1.06 .53 1.59
1996 13.76 1.05 (.19) .86
1995 12.90 1.04 .84 1.88
<CAPTION>
Missouri
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 14.20 .49 (1.09) (.60)
1999 14.44 .97 (.22) .75
1998 13.68 .99 .78 1.77
1997 13.11 1.00 .55 1.55
1996 13.37 .96 (.30) .66
1995 12.35 .95 1.02 1.97
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Less Distributions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Net
Investment Investment Capital Capital
Income Income Gains Gains
To Common To Preferred To Common To Preferred
Shareholders Shareholders+ Shareholders Shareholders+ Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Connecticut
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) $(.41) $(.10) $-- $-- $ (.51)
1999 (.80) (.20) -- -- (1.00)
1998 (.80) (.23) -- -- (1.03)
1997 (.76) (.20) -- -- (.96)
1996 (.73) (.25) -- -- (.98)
1995 (.74) (.23) -- -- (.97)
<CAPTION>
Massachusetts
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) (.42) (.09) -- -- (.51)
1999 (.85) (.20) -- -- (1.05)
1998 (.85) (.24) -- -- (1.09)
1997 (.84) (.22) -- -- (1.06)
1996 (.80) (.24) -- -- (1.04)
1995 (.78) (.24) -- -- (1.02)
<CAPTION>
Missouri
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) (.39) (.13) -- -- (.52)
1999 (.77) (.22) -- -- (.99)
1998 (.76) (.25) -- -- (1.01)
1997 (.73) (.25) -- -- (.98)
1996 (.67) (.25) -- -- (.92)
1995 (.69) (.26) -- -- (.95)
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Total Returns
------------------------
Based
Ending Based on
Net Ending on Net
Asset Market Market Asset
Value Value Value* Value*
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Connecticut
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) $13.22 $15.0000 (8.08)% (5.66)%
1999 14.44 16.7500 13.50 5.22
1998 14.49 15.5000 15.61 12.39
1997 13.63 14.1250 9.58 11.01
1996 12.99 13.6250 14.06 3.97
1995 13.20 12.6250 2.22 12.74
<CAPTION>
Massachusetts
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 13.55 14.7500 (5.62) (5.10)
1999 14.72 16.0625 2.48 4.47
1998 14.91 16.5000 18.08 11.91
1997 14.11 14.7500 13.76 10.28
1996 13.58 13.7500 8.99 4.55
1995 13.76 13.3750 14.12 13.58
<CAPTION>
Missouri
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 13.08 13.0000 (5.73) (5.20)
1999 14.20 14.1875 5.24 3.64
1998 14.44 14.1875 14.53 11.31
1997 13.68 13.0625 10.53 10.09
1996 13.11 12.5000 10.07 3.09
1995 13.37 12.0000 6.13 14.74
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Ratios/Supplemental Data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before Credit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of Net Ratio of Net
Ratio of Investment Ratio of Investment
Expenses Income to Expenses Income to
to Average Average to Average Average
Ending Net Assets Net Assets Total Total
Net Applicable Applicable Net Assets Net Assets
Assets to Common to Common Including Including
(000) Shares++ Shares++ Preferred++ Preferred++
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Connecticut
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) $107,295 1.37%* 7.35%* .89%* 4.78%*
1999 113,465 1.32 6.82 .88 4.54
1998 113,384 1.33 7.02 .88 4.61
1997 108,524 1.38 7.46 .89 4.79
1996 104,928 1.40 7.37 .89 4.71
1995 105,851 1.49 8.09 .92 4.99
<CAPTION>
Massachusetts
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 96,988 1.34* 7.46* .88* 4.89*
1999 102,288 1.31 6.87 .88 4.61
1998 102,936 1.31 7.22 .88 4.81
1997 99,006 1.34 7.63 .88 4.99
1996 96,303 1.35 7.61 .88 4.95
1995 97,071 1.49 8.28 .94 5.20
<CAPTION>
Missouri
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 44,262 1.50* 7.24* .97* 4.66*
1999 46,603 1.44 6.71 .95 4.44
1998 46,935 1.47 7.03 .97 4.60
1997 45,224 1.54 7.38 .99 4.74
1996 44,014 1.57 7.13 1.01 4.57
1995 44,566 1.75 7.88 1.08 4.86
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Ratios/Supplemental Data
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After Credit**
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of Net Ratio of Net
Ratio of Investment Ratio of Investment
Expenses Income to Expenses Income to
to Average Average to Average Average
Net Assets Net Assets Total Total
Applicable Applicable Net Assets Net Assets Portfolio
to Common to Common Including Including Turnover
Shares++ Shares++ Preferred++ Preferred++ Rate
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Connecticut
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 1.34%* 7.38%* .87%* 4.80%* 10%
1999 1.30 6.84 .87 4.55 7
1998 1.33 7.02 .88 4.61 13
1997 1.38 7.46 .89 4.79 18
1996 1.40 7.37 .89 4.71 15
1995 1.49 8.09 .92 4.99 18
<CAPTION>
Massachusetts
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 1.34* 7.46* .88* 4.89* 3
1999 1.30 6.88 .87 4.62 11
1998 1.31 7.22 .88 4.81 17
1997 1.34 7.63 .88 4.99 22
1996 1.35 7.61 .88 4.95 18
1995 1.49 8.28 .94 5.20 29
<CAPTION>
Missouri
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended 5/31:
2000(a) 1.48* 7.26* .95* 4.68* 7
1999 1.43 6.72 .95 4.44 10
1998 1.47 7.03 .97 4.60 25
1997 1.54 7.38 .99 4.74 36
1996 1.57 7.13 1.01 4.57 34
1995 1.75 7.88 1.08 4.86 34
* Total Investment Return on Market Value is the combination of reinvested
dividend income, reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, and
changes in stock price per share. Total Return on Net Asset Value is the
combination of reinvested dividend income, reinvested capital gains
distributions, if any, and changes in net asset value per share. Total
returns are not annualized.
** After custodian fee credit, where applicable (note 1).
+ The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents.
++ Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Preferred
shareholders; income ratios reflect income earned on assets attributable to
Preferred shares.
(a) For the six months ended November 30, 1999.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Build Your Wealth Automatically
Sidebar text: Nuveen offers a number of convenient ways to add to your portfolio
and earn the tax-free income you need to achieve your financial goals.
Sidebar text: Nuveen makes reinvesting easy. A phone call is all it takes to set
up your reinvestment account.
Nuveen Exchange-Traded Funds Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Your Nuveen Exchange-Traded Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest dividends
and/or capital gains distributions in additional fund shares. If you do not
elect to reinvest distributions, all distributions are paid by check or can be
deposited directly into your bank or brokerage account.
By choosing to reinvest, you'll be able to invest money regularly and
automatically, and watch your investment grow through the power of tax-free
compounding. You'll also potentially benefit from dollar-cost averaging, a
technique of investing at regular intervals, which allows you to build a
high-quality, tax-free portfolio conveniently and cost effectively over time.
Dollar-cost averaging does not ensure a profit, nor does it protect you against
loss in a declining market. Because such a plan involves continuous investment
regardless of fluctuating prices, investors should consider their financial
ability to continue purchases through periods of low price levels.
Easy and convenient
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each month you'll receive a statement
showing your total dividends and distributions, the date of investment, the
shares acquired and the price per share, and the total number of shares you own.
Income or capital gains taxes may be payable on dividends or distributions that
are reinvested.
How shares are purchased
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased on the open
market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares are trading at or above net
asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the
then-current market price. If the shares are trading at less than net asset
value, shares for your account will be purchased on the open market. Dividends
and distributions received to purchase shares in the open market will normally
be invested shortly after the dividend payment date. No interest will be paid on
dividends and distributions awaiting reinvestment. Because the market price of
shares may increase before purchases are completed, the average purchase price
per share may exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the
acquisition of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid
in shares issued by the fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable brokerage
commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan participants. These
commissions usually will be lower than those charged on individual transactions.
Flexibility
You may, of course, change your distribution option or withdraw from the Plan at
any time, should your needs or situation change. Should you withdraw, you can
receive a certificate for all whole shares credited to your reinvestment account
and cash payment for fractional shares, or cash payment for all reinvestment
account shares, less brokerage commissions and a $2.50 service fee.
You can also reinvest if your shares are registered in the name of a brokerage
firm, bank, or other nominee. Just ask your investment adviser if the firm will
participate on your behalf. If not, it's easy to have the shares registered in
your name and to apply for a reinvestment account directly. Participants whose
shares are registered in the name of one firm may not be able to transfer the
shares to another firm and continue to participate in the Plan.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Although
the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge
payable by the participants, there is no direct service charge to participants
in the Plan at this time.
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan or to enroll in
or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your financial adviser or call us at (800)
257-8787.
<PAGE>
Fund Information
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Robert P. Bremner
Lawrence H. Brown
Anne E. Impellizzeri
Peter R. Sawers
William J. Schneider
Timothy R. Schwertfeger
Judith M. Stockdale
FUND MANAGER
Nuveen Advisory Corp.
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AGENT
AND SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
The Chase Manhattan Bank
4 New York Plaza
New York, NY 10004-2413
(800) 257-8787
LEGAL COUNSEL
Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP
Washington, D.C.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, IL
FUND POLICIES
The Board of Trustees of your Fund recently modified certain investment policies
of the Fund. The Fund was formerly not permitted to invest more than 5% of its
total assets in Municipal Leases that contain "non-appropriation" clauses. In
addition, your Fund was not permitted to invest more than 10% of its total
assets in Municipal Leases and securities that are unmarketable, illiquid or not
readily marketable. The Municipal Lease market has matured since the Fund's
inception, and non-appropriation leases have become more liquid and widely
accepted. The Nuveen Exchange-Traded Fund Board has eliminated the restrictions
noted above, replacing them with requirements that the Funds limit investments
in non-appropriation Municipal Leases to those that meet one or more of six
criteria that indicate that the issuer will be motivated to continue to
appropriate monies to make the payments under the Municipal Lease.
The Board also eliminated the Fund's policy not to invest more than 5% of its
total assets in unsecured obligations of issuers which, together with their
predecessors, have been in operation for less than three years.
Each fund intends to repurchase shares of its own common or preferred stock in
the future at such times and in such amounts as is deemed advisable. No shares
were repurchased during the 6-month period ended November 30, 1999. Any future
repurchases will be reported to shareholders in the next annual or semiannual
report.
<PAGE>
Serving Investors for Generations
Photo of: John Nuveen, Sr.
Since our founding in 1898, John Nuveen & Co. has been synonymous with
investments that withstand the test of time. Today we offer a broad range of
quality investments designed for individuals seeking to build and sustain
wealth. In fact, more than 1.3 million investors have trusted Nuveen to help
them pursue their financial goals.
The cornerstone of Nuveen's investment philosophy is a commitment to disciplined
long-term investment strategies focused on providing consistent, attractive
performance over time - with moderated risk. We emphasize quality securities
carefully chosen through in-depth research, and we follow those securities
closely over time to ensure that they continue to meet our exacting standards.
Whether your focus is long-term growth, dependable current income or sustaining
accumulated wealth, Nuveen offers a wide variety of investments and services to
help meet your unique circumstances and financial planning needs. Our equity,
balanced, and tax-free income funds, along with our defined portfolios and
private asset management, can help you build a better, well-diversified
portfolio.
Talk with your financial adviser to learn more about how Nuveen investment
products and services can help you. Or call us at (800) 257-8787 for more
information, including a prospectus where applicable. Please read that
information carefully before investing.
LOGO: NUVEEN
John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-1286
www.nuveen.com
FSA-3-11-99
