ACCOLADE FUNDS
497, 1996-07-22
Previous: UCFC ACCEPTANCE CORP, 8-K, 1996-07-22
Next: NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC RESOURCES INC, 35-CERT, 1996-07-22



To subscribe  to Louis  Rukeyser's  Mutual Funds at a special  half- price rate,
call 1-800-892-9702.

[GRAPHIC:  PHOTO OF LOUIS RUKEYSER TOP LEFT CORNER]

[GRAPHIC:  PHOTO OF ART BONNEL TOP RIGHT CORNER]

                  REPRINTED FROM LOUIS RUKEYSER'S MUTUAL FUNDS

                                   JULY 1996

                             THE RUKEYSER INTERVIEW

GROWTH IS NO GAMBLE

          Arthur J. Bonnel loves to live in Reno, where he has made his home for
more than three decades,  and in the past year this amiable University of Nevada
graduate  has  enabled us to  deliver a hefty  jackpot  to our  readers.  When I
featured him in The Rukeyser Interview in March 1995, his fledgling  fund--which
for a  while  had  "Accolade"  or  "United  Services"  as a  prefix  but is now,
appropriately,   called  simply  the  Bonnel  Growth  Fund  (800-426-  6635;  no
load)--was  less  than  six  months  old.  That's  much too  young by our  usual
standards, but as I noted at the time, Art's "exceptionally strong track record"
as manager of MIM Stock Appreciation Fund from 1987 to 1994 made his new venture
worthy of special attention--and a special look.
          Wow!  Art's  fund,  up just 4.72% when he last  appeared  on this page
(though  even that was more than twice as well as most  growth  funds were doing
then),  has now soared  85.5% since its  October  1994  inception--and  the Wall
Street Journal has just reported that it was the single  best-performing  of all
funds specializing in mid-sized  companies over the past 12 months. Yet the fund
remains relatively undiscovered by the conventional media. Its assets were below
$50  million as  recently  as March 31, and though  they've  since  grown to $80
million (and climbing  fast, as the word gets around),  that's still quite small
and flexible by the standards of the  industry's  giants.  Will renewed  success
spoil Art  Bonnel?  Not so's you'd  notice;  he told me the only  analyst he has
working with him is his wife--and one of his most concerned  shareholders is his
mother.--LR
 ................................................................................
ART,  WHILE YOUR FUND IS GENERALLY  LISTED AMONG MID-CAP  FUNDS--THAT  IS, THOSE
SPECIALIZING  IN COMPANIES WHOSE MARKET  CAPITALIZATION  IS BETWEEN $800 MILLION
AND $2 BILLION--IN FACT YOU RANGE WELL OUTSIDE THOSE LIMITS, IN BOTH DIRECTIONS.
WHAT DOES QUALIFY A COMPANY FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION?
          Well,  basically,  the  earnings  have to be going  up.  We're  always
searching for companies that have strong fundamentals. That means we'll buy some
very large  companies like Sears and some smaller  companies  like Lo-Jack.  The
majority tend to fall into the mid-cap range, but most anything is fair game for
us. I like to focus on mid-cap: I think there's more potential growth there over
time.

THE MARKET FOR YOUR KIND OF COMPANIES HAS BEEN SIZZLING.  HOW MUCH LONGER DO YOU
EXPECT THIS TO LAST?
          That's an interesting  question,  because it revolves  around what the
stock market is going to do.  Right now, I don't think the market is  overvalued
or  undervalued.  And a lot of money is coming  into mutual  funds;  I'm getting
close to a million dollars a day--quite a bit for a small fund.

Growth-fund managers see that the big companies aren't showing the good earnings
increases that they were last year, so they go to the secondary issues, which we
focus on, and say, "Hey,  here are some companies with some good  earnings."

WHY SHOULD NOT  INVESTORS  WHO MAKE THAT  ANALYSIS GO  DIRECTLY TO EVEN  SMALLER
COMPANIES?
          With  smaller  companies,  if there is a problem the stock can open as
much as 50% down from the prior close.  They're very risky, because of this lack
of liquidity. I like to see companies that trade 50,000 or 100,000 shares a day.
Then I know I can at  least  move in and  out of the  company,  and I  think  an
individual investor should look at that also.

SO YOU EXPECT THE MID-SIZED COMPANIES TO CONTINUE TO BE THE HAPPY MEDIUM FOR THE
NEXT YEAR?
         I really  do. I don't see any  great  gains in  earnings  for the large
companies.  And part of the reason is that the dollar has been getting stronger;
that doesn't help the large multinational  companies.

AT CURRENT PRICES, WHICH STOCKS MOST ATTRACT YOU?
         Well, that's a very provocative  question,  because I do like retailing
and we have a fairly large position in the fund, but I'm beginning to scratch my
head on this  one.  I think  retailing  has  maybe  three to six more  months of
positive  price  action left.  I've been in Sears since April of last year.  The
stock's around $50; I think it can go maybe to $60, $65. But I really don't know
if I'd recommend it now. I might be moving out of a lot of my retailers near the
end of this year. But there is one in retailing that I think is very  attractive
and has  more  than six  months'  appreciation  left in it.  And  that's  PIER 1
IMPORTS,  a little  company  that has 691 stores in 47 states as well as Canada,
Mexico and England.  Last July,  they started  moving to television  advertising
from  print  advertising.  They  completed  this  in  March,  and  they  started
remodeling a lot of their stores.  This combination is giving them  double-digit
sales growth.
          The  company  isn't  recognized  on Wall  Street  as a growth  company
because they had a few problems in the past:  their Sunbelt Nursery  investment,
which they're getting rid of; trading losses, which were announced at the end of
last  year;  and  overexpansion  in the last  decade.  They  now are past  these
problems, and earnings are coming on stronger. I see earnings this year reaching
probably $1.00,  $1.10 a share, which would be the highest ever, and in the next
year to two years, I think $1.25 to $1.50 is reasonable.  You're looking at this
being maybe a $25 stock.

WHICH OTHER AREAS ATTRACT YOU?
         One industry that really  attracts me right now is gaming.  I think two
gaming stocks in particular  look  attractive,  and these are recent  purchases:
CIRCUS CIRCUS and MGM GRAND. Circus has 13,665 hotel rooms, and in late June was
scheduled to open the Monte Carlo casino/resort in Las Vegas. What's interesting
about this  hotel/casino  is that they have nearly 100%  occupancy,  with paying
customers.  Most other  hotel/casinos  "comp," and give their  rooms away.  This
company is coming back after  consolidation  since 1993, when I think gaming got
overextended.  If it can break  through the high of $49 that it  established  in
1993, I think this is a mid-$60s stock.  And that goes along with the MGM Grand.
They're  also going to be opening a resort in Las  Vegas,  called New York,  New
York. And that's going to add 2,035 rooms to their existing 5,005 rooms.  Do you
realize how long it would take you to go through these two hotels,  if you slept
in a different room each night?

THAT'S A WONDERFUL AMBITION YOU HAVE, ART.
          [laughs]  It would  take a long,  long time!  I live in Reno,  but Las
Vegas is  opening  up so many new  resort  casinos  that  even I want to go down
there,  take some time off and see what's  happening.  It's an adult Disneyland.

WHAT ARE YOUR CURRENT THOUGHTS ON TECHNOLOGY?
         I'd like to  reiterate  a buy that I gave you the last  time we  spoke:
LO-JACK.  It was $7.13 then,  and went up to $17 after we  recommended  it. Then
there was a problem with margins in the New York/New  Jersey area, and the stock
sold down to around $10 before  coming  back a bit. I think  Lo-Jack is still an
extremely  attractive  buy.  They  have a  patented  system  designed  to assist
law-enforcement  personnel in tracking and recovering  stolen vehicles.  They're
buying back 2.2 million of their shares,  about 10% of outstanding  shares. They
are looking to get new franchisees from Taiwan, South Africa, Venezuela--they're
even opening up a franchise in Russia. They're in 12 jurisdictions in the United
States.  This company is so strong financially,  it's just mind-boggling.  I see
the stock probably in the low- to mid- $20s over the next couple of years.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BONNEL'S BETS
- -------------
                                           Recent     52-week        Earnings
Stock (Symbol)                             Price      High/Low       1995/1996*
================================================================================
<S>                                        <C>      <C>            <C>     
Pier 1 Imports (NYSE: PIR) ............    $15.38   $16.88/$8.88   $0.88+/$1.09+
Circus Circus Ent. (NYSE: CIR) ........     42.25    44.63/24.75    1.72#/1.75#
MGM Grand (NYSE: MGG) .................     45.88    48.75/22.75    0.96/1.69
Lo-Jack (OTC: LOJN) ...................     12.25    17.50/9.13     0.41+/0.47+
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Consensus estimates. +FY ends in Feb. 1996 and Feb. 1997. #FY ends in Jan. 1996
and Jan. 1997. Source: Bloomberg, Zacks.
</TABLE>

IN TERMS OF MARKET SECTORS, HOW DIVERSIFIED ARE YOU NOW?
          We have around 115 different  stocks in over 60 different  industries.
I'm in  practically  every  industry!  I like broad  diversification;  I've been
managing money for well over two decades, and I realize that if you put all your
eggs in one basket, boy, if that basket falls, you're going to have an omelet. I
don't like omelets.

WHAT COULD  HAPPEN  THAT WOULD  DIMINISH  INVESTOR  ENTHUSIASM  FOR THE KINDS OF
STOCKS YOU BUY?
          People getting a little too enthusiastic about the market. But I don't
really see that today.

ART, YOU TOLD ME CORRECTLY EARLY LAST YEAR THAT "1995 IS GOING TO BE A VERY GOOD
YEAR,"  AND YOU ALSO SAID YOU COULD SEE THE DOW "NEAR  8,000 BY THE YEAR  2000."
WOULD YOU CARE TO UPDATE  THOSE  NUMBERS  NOW?
          Yes. I think that the Dow will  continue to run up, to close to 20,000
by  the  year  2007--because  of  the  continued  positive  implications  of the
demographics of people funding retirement accounts.

WHAT'S YOUR BEST ADVICE FOR  MUTUAL-FUND  INVESTORS  LOOKING AHEAD TO 1997?
          Hang on. This should be a good year,  and 1997 should be even a better
year,  because I think  earnings  are going to start to expand in '97.  So don't
sell out this year. When the market sells off, that's the time to say, good, I'm
going to be buying more shares of the mutual fund.  Take  advantage  and buy the
dips.

- ----------
For more  information,  including  charges  and  expenses,  call  1-800-4-BONNEL
(1-800-426-6635).   Please  read  the  prospectus  carefully  before  investing.
Investment  returns and principal  value may vary,  and you may have a gain or a
loss when you sell shares. Average annual total rate of return for 1 year period
ended 6/28/96,  38.45%. Average annual total rate of return for life of the Fund
(10/17/94 through 6/28/96),  39.39%.  Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. US stands for "United Services." This reprint is not a solicitation for
any funds listed herein.

Reprinted  from  LOUIS  RUKEYSER'S  MUTUAL  FUNDS o 1101  King St.,  Suite  400,
Alexandria, VA 22314 o July 1996


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission