<PAGE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(x) Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 1996
or
(_) Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission file number: 0-18702
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND /(SM)/ VI L.P.
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 13-3568563
------------------------------- -------------------------------
(State of other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
C/O MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
MERRILL LYNCH WORLD HEADQUARTERS
WORLD FINANCIAL CENTER
SOUTH TOWER, 6TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10080-6106
------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 236-4167
--------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: None
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: Limited
-------
Partnership Units
-----------------
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates: the
registrant is a limited partnership and, accordingly, has no voting stock held
by non-affiliates or otherwise.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant's "1996 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report," the
annual report to security holders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996,
is incorporated by reference into Part II, Item 8, hereof and filed as an
Exhibit herewith.
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND /(SM)/ VI L.P.
ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1996 ON FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
-----------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PART I PAGE
------ ----
<C> <S> <C>
Item 1. Business................................................................................... 1
Item 2. Properties................................................................................. 7
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.......................................................................... 7
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........................................ 8
PART II
-------
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters...................... 8
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.................................................................... 8
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations...... 11
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................................................ 13
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure....... 14
PART III
--------
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant........................................ 14
Item 11. Executive Compensation.................................................................... 16
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management............................ 16
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............................................ 16
PART IV
-------
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K........................... 17
</TABLE>
-i-
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1: BUSINESS
--------
(a) General Development of Business:
-------------------------------
The SECTOR Strategy Fund /(SM)/ VI L.P. (the "Partnership" or the
"Fund") was organized under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act
on April 23, 1993 and began trading operations on September 10, 1993. The Fund
is closed-end and made only the initial offering of its units of limited
partnership interest ("Units"). The Partnership engages in the speculative
trading of a portfolio of futures and forward contracts and related options in
the currencies, interest rates, metals, agricultural and energy sectors of the
world commodity markets.
Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc. (the "General Partner" or
"MLIP") acts as the general partner of the Partnership and selects and allocates
the Fund's assets among professional advisors ("Trading Advisors" or
"Advisors"), each unaffiliated with MLIP and each of which trades independently
of the others. MLIP also determines what percentage of the Fund's assets to
allocate to trading and what percentage to hold in reserve. Merrill Lynch
Futures Inc. (the "Commodity Broker" or "MLF") is the Partnership's commodity
broker. The General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch Group
Inc., which, in turn, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
("ML&Co."). The Commodity Broker is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
ML&Co. (ML&Co. and its affiliates are herein sometimes referred to as "Merrill
Lynch").
In addition to its trading accounts, the Partnership maintains a
cash account. From time to time, the General Partner allocates and reallocates
Partnership assets among its trading and cash accounts in an attempt to increase
profit potential while limiting the downside risks associated with futures and
forward trading (in order to prevent ML&Co. from incurring any obligations under
its guarantee of a minimum Net Asset Value per Unit, as described below).
Initially, the General Partner allocated approximately 30% of the Partnership's
assets to cash and approximately 70% to the trading accounts. As of December 31,
1996, that ratio was approximately 43% to cash and 57% to trading.
The total initial capitalization of the Partnership as of September
10, 1993 was $108,693,900. Through December 31, 1996, Units with an aggregate
Net Asset Value of $80,668,355 have been redeemed (including December 31, 1996
redemptions which were actually paid in January 1997), the Partnership's
capitalization was $30,946,907, and the Net Asset Value of a Unit sold as of
September 10, 1993 for $100 was $108.85.
The Fund is a "principal protected" commodity pool. ML&Co. provides
the guarantee described below under Item 1(c), "Narrative Description of
Business - ML&Co.'s 'Principal Protection' Undertaking to the Fund" - that the
Net Asset Value per Unit will equal at least $100 (the initial subscription
price as of September 10, 1993) as of December 31, 1998 (the "Principal
Assurance Date"). This guarantee does not prevent substantial investor losses,
but rather serves only as a form of "stop loss," limiting the maximum loss which
investors who retain their Units until the Principal Assurance Date can incur.
In order to protect ML&Co. from any liability under its guarantee, MLIP imposes
substantial opportunity costs on the Partnership by deleveraging its trading,
allocating a substantial portion of the Fund's assets to its cash account rather
than to trading. At such time, if any, as the Net Asset Value per Unit declined
to 110% or less of the present value of $100 discounted back from the Principal
Assurance Date, MLIP would terminate trading altogether in order to ensure that
ML&Co. incurred no financial obligation to the Fund under ML&Co.'s guarantee of
the minimum Net Asset Value per Unit.
Through December 31, 1996, the net gain in the Net Asset Value per
Unit was 8.85%. The highest month Net Asset Value per Unit was $110.86
(November, 1996) and the lowest $92.71 (April, 1994).
(b) Financial Information about Industry Segments:
---------------------------------------------
The Partnership's business constitutes only one segment for
financial reporting purposes, i.e., a speculative "commodity pool."
-1-
<PAGE>
(c) Narrative Description of Business:
---------------------------------
GENERAL
The Partnership was organized to trade in futures, options on futures
and forward contracts in major sectors of the world economy, with the objective
of achieving capital appreciation over time while assuring investors of at least
a return of their initial investment as of the Principal Assurance Date.
The General Partner functions as the Partnership's trading manager and
is responsible for selecting Advisors to manage the Partnership's assets,
allocating and reallocating assets among the Advisors and determining the
percentage of the Partnership's assets committed to trading from time to time.
Although considered as a whole, the Partnership trades in a
diversified range of international markets, certain of the Trading Advisors,
considered individually, concentrate primarily on trading in a limited portfolio
of markets.
The different "sectors" included in the Partnership's portfolio, and
the extent to which the portfolios traded by two or more Trading Advisors may
overlap, varies substantially over time. The Trading Advisors chosen to trade
the Partnership's assets in a particular market "sector" may also trade in other
"sectors," thereby increasing the possibility of portfolio overlap.
The Fund trades in diverse international futures and forward markets.
These markets are traded through futures, options on futures and forward
contracts and offer the ability to trade either side of a market (long or
short).
The Fund accesses certain of the Trading Advisors not by opening
individual managed accounts with them, but rather through investing in private
funds sponsored by MLIP through which the trading accounts of different MLIP-
sponsored funds managed by the same Advisor and pursuant to the same strategy
are consolidated.
One of the objectives of the Fund is to provide diversification to a
limited portion of the risk segment of the Limited Partners' portfolios into an
investment field that has historically often demonstrated a low degree of
performance correlation with traditional stock and bond holdings. Since it
began trading, the Fund's returns have, in fact, frequently been significantly
non-correlated (not, however, negatively correlated) with the United States
stock and bond markets.
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.'S "PRINCIPAL PROTECTION" UNDERTAKING TO THE FUND
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the parent company of the Merrill Lynch
organization, which includes the General Partner and the Commodity Broker, has
agreed to contribute sufficient capital to the Partnership so that it will have
adequate funds, after adjustment for all liabilities to third parties, that the
Net Asset Value per Unit will be no less than $100 as of the Principal Assurance
Date. This guarantee, which is effective only as of the Principal Assurance
Date, is a guarantee only of a return of subscribers' initial investment, not of
profit. This guarantee is a general, unsecured obligation of ML&Co.
OPERATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP AFTER PRINCIPAL ASSURANCE DATE
MLIP may determine to dissolve the Partnership as of the Principal
Assurance Date, to extend the ML&Co. guarantee for a certain period of time
(resetting the minimum Net Asset Value per Unit guaranteed by ML&Co.) or to
continue to operate the Fund without a "principal protection" feature. All
investors will be given notice by no later than November 15, 1998 as to what the
operation of the Fund (if any) will be after the Principal Assurance Date.
USE OF PROCEEDS AND INTEREST INCOME
General. In the Fund's speculative trading, the Fund's assets are not
-------
used to purchase or acquire any asset but rather held as security for and to pay
the Fund's trading losses as well as any expenses and redemptions. The primary
use of the Fund's capital is to permit the Advisors to trade on a speculative
basis in a wide range of different futures, forwards and options on futures
markets on its behalf, while allocating to the Partnership's cash account such
amounts as MLIP deems
-2-
<PAGE>
appropriate in order to protect ML&Co. from any obligation under its guarantee.
While being used for this purpose, the Fund's assets are also generally
available to earn interest, as more fully described below under "--Available
Assets."
Market Sectors. The Partnership trades in a diversified group of
--------------
markets under the direction of multiple independent Advisors. These Advisors
can, and do, from time to time materially alter the allocation of their overall
trading commitments among different market sectors. Except in the case of
certain trading programs which are purposefully limited in the markets which
they trade, there is essentially no restriction on the commodity interests which
may be traded by any Advisor or the rapidity with which an Advisor may alter its
market sector allocations.
The Fund's financial statements contain information relating to the
market sectors traded by the Fund. There can, however, be no assurance as to
which markets may be included in the Fund's portfolio or as to in which market
sectors the Fund's trading may be concentrated at any one time or over time.
Market Types. The Fund trades on a variety of United States and
------------
foreign futures exchanges. Applicable exchange rules differ significantly among
different countries and exchanges. Substantially all of the Fund's off-exchange
trading takes place in the highly liquid, institutionally based currency forward
markets. The forward markets are generally unregulated, and in its forward
trading the Fund does not deposit margin with respect to its positions. The
Partnership's forward currency trading is executed exclusively through the
Foreign Exchange Service Desk (the "F/X Desk") operated by MLIP and certain of
its affiliates, with MLF as the back-to-back intermediary to the ultimate
counterparties, which include Merrill Lynch Investment Bank ("MLIB") with which
the Advisors trade on behalf of the Fund.
As in the case of its market sector allocations, the Fund's
commitments to different types of markets - U.S. and non-U.S., regulated and
unregulated - differ substantially from time to time as well as over time. The
Fund has no policy restricting its relative commitment to any of these different
types of markets.
The Fund's financial statements contain information relating to the
types of markets traded by the Fund. There can, however, be no assurance as to
in which markets the Fund may trade or the Fund's trading may be concentrated at
any one time or over time.
Custody of Assets. All of the Fund's assets are currently held in
-----------------
CFTC-regulated customer accounts at MLF.
Available Assets. The Fund earns interest, as described below, on its
----------------
"Available Assets," which can be generally described as the cash actually held
by the Fund or invested in short-term Treasury bills. Available Assets are held
primarily in U.S. dollars, and to a lesser extent in foreign currencies, and are
comprised of the following: (a) the Fund's cash balance in the offset accounts
(as described below) - which includes "open trade equity" (unrealized gains and
losses on open positions) on United States futures contracts, which is paid into
or out of the Fund's account on a daily basis; (b) short-term Treasury bills
purchased by the Fund; and (c) the Fund's cash balance in foreign currencies
derived from its trading in non-U.S. dollar denominated futures and options
contracts, which includes open trade equity on those exchanges which settle
gains and losses on open positions in such contracts prior to the closing out of
such positions. Available Assets do not include, and the Fund does not earn
interest on, the Fund's gains or losses on its open forward, commodity option
and certain foreign futures positions since such gains or losses are not
collected or paid until such positions are closed out.
The Partnership's Available Assets may be greater than, less than or
equal to the Fund's Net Asset Value (on which the redemption value of the Units
is based) primarily because Net Asset Value reflects all gains and losses on
open positions as well as accrued but unpaid expenses.
The interest income arrangements for the Partnership's U.S. dollar
Available Assets differ from those applicable to its non-U.S. dollar Available
Assets. Interest income, once accrued by the Fund, is subject to the risk of
trading losses.
-3-
<PAGE>
Interest Earned on the Fund's U.S. Dollar Available Assets. The
----------------------------------------------------------
Fund's U.S. dollar Available Assets are held in cash in offset accounts and in
short-term Treasury bills purchased from dealers unaffiliated with Merrill
Lynch. Offset accounts are non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts
maintained with banks unaffiliated with Merrill Lynch. An integral feature of
the offset arrangements is that the participating banks specifically acknowledge
that the offset accounts are MLF customer accounts, not subject to any Merrill
Lynch liability.
MLF credits the Partnership, as of the end of each month, with
interest at the effective daily 91-day Treasury bill rate on the average daily
U.S. dollar Available Assets held in the offset accounts during such month. The
Fund receives all the interest paid on the short-term Treasury bills in which it
invests.
The use of the offset account arrangements for the Partnership's U.S.
dollar Available Assets may be discontinued by Merrill Lynch whether or not
Merrill Lynch otherwise continues to maintain its offset arrangements. The
offset arrangements are dependent on the banks' continued willingness to make
overnight credits available to Merrill Lynch, which, in turn, is dependent on
the credit standing of ML&Co. If Merrill Lynch were to determine that the
offset arrangements had ceased to be practicable (either because ML&Co. credit
lines at participating banks were exhausted or for any other reason), Merrill
Lynch would thereafter attempt to invest all of the Fund's U.S. dollar Available
Assets to the maximum practicable extent in short-term Treasury bills. All
interest earned on the U.S. dollar Available Assets so invested would be paid to
the Fund, but MLIP would expect the amount of such interest to be less than that
available to the Fund under the offset account arrangements. The remaining U.S.
dollar Available Assets of the Fund would be kept in cash to meet variation
margin payments and pay expenses, but would not earn interest for the Fund.
The banks at which the offset accounts are maintained make available
to Merrill Lynch interest-free overnight credits, loans or overdrafts in the
amount of the Fund's U.S. dollar Available Assets held in the offset accounts,
charging Merrill Lynch a small fee for this service. The economic benefits
derived by Merrill Lynch - net of the interest credits paid to the Fund and the
fee paid to the offset banks - from the offset accounts have not exceeded 3/4
of 1% per annum of the Fund's average daily U.S. dollar Available Assets held in
the offset accounts. These revenues to Merrill Lynch are in addition to the
Brokerage Commissions and Administrative Fees paid by the Fund to MLF and MLIP,
respectively.
Interest Paid by Merrill Lynch on the Fund's Non-U.S. Dollar Available
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets. Under the single currency margining system implemented for the
- ------
Partnership, the Partnership itself does not deposit foreign currencies to
margin trading in non-U.S. dollar denominated futures contracts and options. MLF
provides the necessary margin, permitting the Fund to retain the monies which
would otherwise be required for such margin as part of the Fund's U.S. dollar
Available Assets. Consequently, the Fund does not earn interest on foreign
margin deposits. The Fund does, however, earn interest on its non-U.S. dollar
Available Assets. Specifically, the Fund is credited by Merrill Lynch with
interest at the local short-term rate on realized and unrealized gains on non-
U.S. dollar denominated positions for such gains actually held in cash by the
Fund. Merrill Lynch charges the Fund Merrill Lynch's cost of financing realized
and unrealized losses on such positions.
In order to avoid the expense of daily currency conversions, the Fund
holds foreign currency gains and finances foreign currency losses on an interim
basis until converted into U.S. dollars and either paid into or out of the
Fund's U.S. dollar Available Assets. Foreign currency gains or losses on open
positions are not converted into U.S. dollars until the positions are closed.
Assets of the Fund while held in foreign currencies are subject to exchange rate
risk.
Forward Transactions. Spot and forward currency contracts are the
--------------------
only non-exchange traded instruments held by the Fund.
To date, approximately 20% to 30% of the Fund's trades by volume have
been in forward currency contracts, but from time to time the percentage of the
Fund's trading represented by forward currency trades may fall substantially
outside this range. In using the F/X Desk, the Fund trades through MLF.
Because the Fund need not deposit any margin with MLF in respect of the Fund's
forward trading, the Fund's additional risk in trading in such unregulated
markets should be limited to a possible loss of unrealized profits on open
forward positions which a counterparty accessed through MLF would not, in the
event of its bankruptcy, be able to pay to MLF for the account of the Fund (MLF
not itself being obligated to pay such unrealized profits to the Fund unless MLF
is paid by MLF's counterparty).
-4-
<PAGE>
Having the Fund (and the other MLF clients using the F/X Desk) trade
through the F/X Desk on the basis of MLF's credit lines permits the F/X Desk to
access a wide range of counterparties without the need of such counterparties
evaluating the individual credit of the Fund (or any other MLF client).
CHARGES
The following table summarizes the charges incurred by the Fund during
1994, 1995 and 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
% OF AVERAGE % OF AVERAGE % OF AVERAGE
DOLLAR MONTH-END DOLLAR MONTH-END DOLLAR MONTH-END
COST AMOUNT NET ASSETS AMOUNT NET ASSETS AMOUNT NET ASSETS
---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Brokerage Commissions** $6,651,658 7.06% $5,627,130 7.40% $2,243,462 6.04%
Administrative Fees** 170,555 0.18 144,285 0.19 57,524 0.15
Profit Shares 721,999 0.77 1,086,165 1.43 434,053 1.17
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total $7,544,212 8.01% $6,857,580 9.02% $2,735,039 7.36%
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
_______________
** A portion of the Brokerage Commissions in prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation of the Administrative
Fees. In addition, the Fund reimbursed MLIP for a total of $1,000,000 of
organizational and offering costs over the first 36 months of operations.
____________________
The foregoing table does not reflect the bid-ask spreads paid by the
Fund on its forward trading, or the annual benefits derived by Merrill Lynch
from the deposit of certain of the Fund's U.S. dollar Available Assets in offset
accounts. See Item 1(c), "Narrative Description of Business - Use of Proceeds
and Interest Income."
The Fund's average month-end Net Assets during 1994, 1995 and 1996
equaled $94,244,751, $76,006,447 and $37,135,556, respectively.
During 1994, 1995 and 1996, the Fund earned $3,643,283, $4,001,380 and
$1,661,887 in interest income, or approximately 3.87%, 5.26% and 4.48% of the
Fund's average month-end Net Assets.
As of January 1, 1996, the 10% per annum Brokerage Commissions paid by
the Fund to MLF were recharacterized as 9.75% per annum Brokerage Commissions
and a 0.25% per annum Administrative Fee paid by the Fund to MLIP. This
recharacterization had no economic effect on the Fund.
As of February 1, 1997, the 9.75% per annum Brokerage Commissions were
reduced to 8.75% per annum (0.7291% of the Fund's month-end assets allocated to
trading).
______________________________
-5-
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CHARGES
RECIPIENT NATURE OF PAYMENT AMOUNT OF PAYMENT
- --------- ----------------- -----------------
MLF Brokerage Commissions A flat-rate monthly commission of
.8125 of 1% (a 9.75% annual rate) of
the Fund's month-end assets
committed to trading. As of December
31, 1996 approximately 57% of the
Fund's assets were allocated to
trading.
During 1994, 1995 and 1996, the
round-turn (each purchase and sale
or sale and purchase of a single
futures contract) equivalent rate of
the Fund's flat-rate Brokerage
Commissions was approximately $27,
$100 and $86, respectively.
As of February 1, 1997, the Fund's
Brokerage Commissions were reduced
to 8.75% per annum, or .7291% of the
Fund's assets committed to trading
as of the end of each month.
MLF Use of Fund assets Merrill Lynch may derive an economic
benefit from the deposit of certain
of the Fund's U.S. dollar Available
Assets in offset accounts; such
benefit to date has not exceeded 3/4
of 1% of such average daily U.S.
dollar Available Assets.
MLIP Administrative Fees As of January 1, 1996, the Brokerage
Commissions payable by the Fund were
reduced to 9.75% annually, and the
Fund began to pay MLIP a monthly
Administrative Fee equal to 0.020833
of 1% of the Fund's month-end assets
committed to trading (0.25%
annually). This change had no
economic effect on the Fund. MLIP
pays all of the Fund's routine
administrative costs.
MLIB Bid--ask spreads Under MLIP's F/X Desk arrangements,
MLIB receives bid--ask spreads on
the forward trades it executes with
the Fund.
Other Bid--ask spreads The counterparties other than MLIB
Counterparties with which the F/X Desk deals also
each receive bid-ask spreads on the
forward trades executed with the
Fund.
MLIP F/X Desk service fees Under the F/X Desk arrangements,
MLIP or another Merrill Lynch
entity receives a service fee equal,
at current exchange rates, to
approximately $5.00 to $12.50 on
each purchase or sale of each
futures contract-equivalent forward
contract executed with
counterparties other than MLIB.
MLIB EFP differentials MLIB or an affiliate receives a
differential spread for exchanging
the Fund's spot currency positions
(which are acquired through the F/X
Desk, as described above) for
equivalent futures positions.
-6-
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CHARGES (CONT'D)
RECIPIENT NATURE OF PAYMENT AMOUNT OF PAYMENT
- --------- ----------------- -----------------
Trading Advisors Profit Shares Prior to January 1, 1997, all
Advisors received quarterly
Profit Shares ranging from 15% to
25% (depending on the Trading
Advisor) of any New Trading Profit.
As of January 1, 1997, a number of
Advisors agreed to receive only
annual Profit Shares. Profit Shares
are also paid upon redemption of
Units. New Trading Profit is
calculated separately in respect of
each Advisor, irrespective of the
overall performance of the Fund. The
Fund may pay substantial Profit
Shares during periods when it is
incurring significant overall
losses.
MLF; Extraordinary expenses Actual costs incurred; none paid to
Others date, and expected to be negligible.
______________________
REGULATION
The General Partner, the Trading Advisors and the Commodity Broker
are each subject to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and
the National Futures Association. Other than in respect of its periodic
reporting requirements, the Partnership itself is generally not subject to
regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, MLIP itself is
registered as an "investment adviser" under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
(i) through (xii) - not applicable.
(xiii) The Partnership has no employees.
(d) Financial Information about Foreign and Domestic Operations
-----------------------------------------------------------
and Export Sales:
- ----------------
The Partnership does not engage in material operations in foreign
countries, nor is a material portion of the Partnership's revenues derived from
customers in foreign countries. The Partnership does, however, trade, from the
United States, on a number of foreign commodity exchanges.
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
----------
The Partnership does not use any physical properties in the
conduct of its business.
The Partnership's only place of business is the place of business of
the General Partner (see Item 10 herein). The General Partner performs all
administrative services for the Partnership from the General Partner's offices.
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
-----------------
There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Partnership or
the General Partner is a party.
John W. Henry & Company, Inc. ("JWH") is one of the Advisors retained
by the Fund, managing approximately 11.5% of the Fund's assets committed to
trading as of January 1, 1997. In September 1996, JWH was named as a co-
defendant in class action lawsuits brought in the California Superior Court, Los
Angeles County and in the New York Supreme Court, New York County. In November,
JWH was named as a co-defendant in a class action complaint filed in Superior
Court of the State of Delaware for Newcastle County that contained the same
allegations as the New York and California complaints. The actions, which seek
unspecified damages, purport to be brought on behalf of investors in certain
Dean Witter, Discover & Co. ("Dean Witter") commodity pools, some of which are
advised by JWH, and are primarily directed at Dean Witter's alleged fraudulent
selling practices in connection with the marketing of those pools. JWH is
-7-
<PAGE>
essentially alleged to have aided and abetted or directly participated with Dean
Witter in those practices. JWH believes the allegations against it are without
merit; it intends to contest these allegations vigorously, and is convinced that
it will be shown to have acted properly and in the best interest of the
investors.
ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
---------------------------------------------------
The Partnership has never submitted any matters to a vote of its
Limited Partners.
PART II
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Market Information:
------------------
There is no established public trading market for the Units, nor
will one develop. Rather, Limited Partners may purchase or redeem Units as of
the end of each month at Net Asset Value, subject to certain early redemption
charges. Units redeemed prior to the Principal Assurance Date are not entitled
to any benefits under the ML & Co Inc. guarantee.
(b) Holders:
-------
As of December 31, 1996, there were 1,795 holders of Units,
including the General Partner and the Trading Advisors.
(c) Dividends:
---------
The Partnership has made no distributions since trading commenced,
nor does the General Partner presently intend to make any distributions in the
future.
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
-----------------------
The following selected financial data has been derived from the audited
financial statements of the Partnership.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED (COMMENCEMENT OF
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, TRADING) TO
INCOME STATEMENT DATA 1996 1995 1994 DECEMBER 31, 1993
--------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Trading Profits (Loss)
Realized Gain $ 4,174,847 $ 9,810,089 $ 64,289 $(1,677,777)
Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) (2,454,976) (2,396,610) 3,288,186 1,623,610
----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Total Trading Results 1,719,871 7,413,479 3,352,475 (54,167)
Interest Income 1,661,887 4,001,380 3,643,283 827,989
----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Total Revenues 3,381,758 11,414,859 6,995,758 773,822
----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Expenses:
Brokerage Commissions 2,243,462 5,771,415 6,822,213 2,280,727
Administrative Fees 57,524 0 0 0
Profit Shares 434,053 1,086,165 721,999 215,596
Total Expenses 2,735,039 6,857,580 7,544,212 2,496,323
----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Income from Investment 984,327 0 0 0
----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) $ 1,631,046 $ 4,557,279 $ (548,454) $(1,722,501)
=========== =========== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
-8-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
BALANCE SHEET DATA* 1996 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fund Net Asset Value $30,946,907 $50,431,013 $93,187,212 $105,198,284
Net Asset Value per Unit $ 108.85 $ 104.04 $ 97.49 $ 98.28
</TABLE>
____________________
* Balance Sheet Data is based on redemption values, which differ immaterially
from Net Asset Values as determined under Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles ("GAAP") due to the treatment of organizational and initial offering
cost reimbursements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1993 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $98.89 $97.86 $98.07 $98.28
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994 $95.94 $93.35 $93.26 $92.71 $95.30 $97.51 $96.01 $94.57 $96.20 $96.73 $97.05 $97.49
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 $95.55 $96.06 $100.28 $101.28 $103.18 $101.04 $98.30 $99.31 $98.71 $97.79 $99.33 $104.04
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 $107.43 $103.23 $105.23 $108.01 $104.83 $104.48 $98.33 $99.85 $101.79 $106.19 $110.86 $108.85
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
-9-
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND /(SM)/ VI L.P.
DECEMBER 31, 1996
Type of Pool: Selected-Advisor/Publicly-Offered/"Principal Protected"/(1)/
Inception of Trading: September 10, 1993
Aggregate Subscriptions: $108,693,900
Current Capitalization: $30,946,907
Worst Monthly Drawdown/(2)/: (5.89)% (7/96)
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown/(3)/: (8.97)% (5/96 - 7/96)
_____________
Net Asset Value per Unit, December 31, 1996: $108.85
---------------------------------------------------
MONTHLY RATES OF RETURNS/(4)/
---------------------------------------------------
MONTH 1996 1995 1994 1993
---------------------------------------------------
January 3.25% (1.98)% (2.38)% N/A
---------------------------------------------------
February (3.91) 0.53 (2.70) N/A
---------------------------------------------------
March 1.94 4.40 (0.09) N/A
---------------------------------------------------
April 2.64 1.00 (0.60) N/A
---------------------------------------------------
May (2.95) 1.88 2.80 N/A
---------------------------------------------------
June (0.33) (2.08) 2.32 N/A
---------------------------------------------------
July (5.89) (2.71) (1.55) N/A
---------------------------------------------------
August 1.55 1.03 (1.50) N/A
---------------------------------------------------
September 1.95 (0.60) 1.73 (1.11)%
---------------------------------------------------
October 4.32 (0.93) 0.55 (1.04)
---------------------------------------------------
November 4.40 1.58 0.33 0.21
---------------------------------------------------
December (1.82) 4.74 0.45 0.21
---------------------------------------------------
Compound Annual
Rate of Return 4.62% 6.75% (0.80)% (1.72)%
---------------------------------------------------
(1) Pursuant to applicable CFTC regulations, a "Multi-Advisor"
fund is defined as one that allocates no more than 25% of its trading assets
(i.e., assets committed to trading) to any single manager. As the Fund may
allocate more than 25% of its trading assets to one or more Advisors, it is
referred to as a "Selected-Advisor" fund. Applicable CFTC regulations define a
"Principal Protected" fund as one which is designed to limit the loss of
participants' initial investment. MLIP's trading leverage policies and the
ML&Co. guarantee limit Limited Partners' losses on their Units to the time value
of their investments over the Time Horizon from the beginning of trading to the
Principal Assurance Date.
(2) Worst Monthly Drawdown represents the largest negative
Monthly Rate of Return experienced by the Fund; a drawdown is measured on the
basis of month-end Net Asset Value only, and does not reflect intra-month
figures.
(3) Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown represents the greatest
percentage decline from a month-end cumulative Monthly Rate of Return without
such cumulative Monthly Rate of Return being equaled or exceeded as of a
subsequent month-end. For example, if the Monthly Rate of Return was (1)% in
each of January and February, 1% in March and (2)% in April, the Peak-to-Valley
Drawdown would still be continuing at the end of April in the amount of
approximately (3)%, whereas if the Monthly Rate of Return had been approximately
3% in March, the Peak-to-Valley Drawdown would have ended as of the end of
February at approximately the (2)% level.
(4) Monthly Rate of Return is the net performance of the Fund
during the month of determination (including interest income and after all
expenses have been accrued or paid) divided by the total equity of the Fund as
of the beginning of such month.
-10-
<PAGE>
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
---------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF OPERATION
- --------------------
OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW; ADVISOR SELECTIONS
The Fund's results of operations depend on MLIP's ability to select
Advisors and the Advisors' ability to trade profitably. MLIP's selection
procedures, as well as the Advisors' trading methods, are confidential, so that
substantially the only available information relevant to the Fund's results of
operations is its actual performance record to date. However, because of the
speculative nature of its trading, the Fund's past performance is not
necessarily indicative of its future results.
MLIP's decision to terminate or reallocate assets among Trading Advisors is
based on a combination of numerous factors. Advisors are, in general,
terminated primarily for unsatisfactory performance, but other factors - for
example, a change in MLIP's or an Advisor's market outlook, apparent deviation
from announced risk control policies, excessive turnover of positions, changes
in principals, commitment of resources to other business activities, etc. - may
also have a role in the termination or reallocation decision. The market
judgment and experience of MLIP's principals is an important factor in its
allocation decisions.
MLIP has no timetable or schedule for making Advisor changes or
reallocations, and generally makes a medium- to long-term commitment to all
Advisors selected. There can be no assurance as to the frequency or number of
Advisor changes that may take place in the future, or as to how long any Advisor
will manage assets for the Partnership.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General. MLIP believes that multi-advisor futures funds should be regarded
-------
as medium- to long-term (i.e., three to five year) investments, but it is
difficult to identify trends in the Fund's operations and virtually impossible
to make any predictions regarding future results based on the results to date.
An investment in the Fund may be less successful over a longer than over a
shorter period.
Markets with sustained price trends tend to be more favorable to managed
futures investments than whipsaw, choppy markets, but (i) this is not always the
case, (ii) it is impossible to predict when price trends will occur and (iii)
different Advisors are affected differently by trending markets as well as by
particular types of trends.
MLIP attempts to control credit risk in the Fund's futures, forward and
options trading (the Fund does not trade derivatives other than futures and
forward contracts and options thereon) by trading only through MLF. MLF acts
solely as a broker or counterparty to the Fund's trades; it does not advise with
respect to, or direct, any such trading.
MLIP attempts to control the market risk inherent in the Fund's trading by
MLIP's multi-advisor strategy and Trading Advisor selections. MLIP reviews the
positions acquired by the Advisors on a daily basis in an effort to determine
whether the overall positions of the Fund may have become what MLIP analyzes as
being excessively concentrated in a limited number of markets - in which case
MLIP may, as of the next month-end or quarter-end, adjust the Fund's Advisor
combination and/or allocations so as to attempt to reduce the risk of such over-
concentration occurring in the future. MLIP also adjusts the percentage of each
series' capital allocated to trading, with the principal objective of protecting
ML&Co. from any liability under its guarantee of a $100 minimum Net Asset Value
per Unit as of the Principal Assurance Date. The market risk to the Fund is
limited by the combination of its "principal protection" feature and multi-
advisor strategy.
The Units began trading with 70% of their capital committed to
trading. As of December 31, 1996 that percentage was 57%. MLIP determinations
as to how much of the Fund's assets to allocate to trading from time to time -
again, a determination primarily dictated by MLIP's objective of ensuring that
ML&Co. is never required to make any payments under its guarantee that the Net
Asset Value per Unit will be at least $100 as of the Principal Assurance Date -
has a material impact on the performance of the Fund.
MLIP may consider making distributions to investors under certain
circumstances (for example, if substantial profits are recognized); however,
MLIP has not done so to date and does not presently intend to do so.
-11-
<PAGE>
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
1994
1994 was characterized by relatively quiet markets without many major price
trends. United States interest rates generally declined during the period, and
as they did, so did the U.S. dollar as compared to the Deutschemark and certain
other major currencies.
1995
In 1995, prevailing price trends in several key markets enabled the
Advisors to trade profitably for the Fund. Although trading in many of the
traditional commodity markets may have been lackluster, the currency and
financial markets offered exceptional trading conditions. After months
characterized by very difficult trading environments, solid price trends across
many markets (including U.S. Treasury and non-dollar bond markets) began to
emerge during the first quarter of 1995. In the second quarter, market
volatility once again began to affect trading, as many previously strong price
trends began to weaken and, in some cases, reverse. The U.S. dollar hit new
lows versus the Japanese yen and Deutschemark before rebounding sharply. In
addition, there were strong indications that the U.S. economy was slowing which,
when coupled with a failure of the German Central Bank to lower interest rates,
stalled a rally in the German bond market. During the third quarter, there was
a correction in U.S. bond prices after several months of a strong uptrend.
Despite exposure to the global interest-rate markets, the Fund's long positions
in Treasury bonds had a negative impact on the Fund. Throughout August and into
September, the U.S. dollar rallied sharply against the Japanese yen and the
Deutschemark as a result of the coordinated intervention by major central banks
and widespread recognition of the growing banking crisis in Japan. Despite
continued price volatility during the final quarter of 1995, the Trading
Advisors were able to identify several trends in key markets. U.S. Treasury
bond prices continued their strong move upward throughout November, due both to
weak economic data and optimism on federal budget talks. As the year ended, the
yield on the 30-year Treasury bond was pushed to its lowest level in more than
two years.
1996
1996 began with the East Coast blizzard, continuing difficulties in federal
budget talks and an economic slowdown having a negative impact on many markets.
The Fund was profitable in January due to strong profits in currency trading as
the U.S. dollar reached a 23-month high against the Japanese yen. In February,
however, the Fund incurred its worst monthly loss due to the sudden reversals in
several strong price trends and considerable volatility in the currency and
financial markets. During March, large profits were taken in the crude oil and
gasoline markets as strong demand continued and talks between the United Nations
and Iraq were suspended. This trend continued into the second quarter, during
which strong gains were also recognized in the agricultural markets as a
combination of drought and excessive rain drove wheat and grain prices to
historic highs. In the late summer and early fall months, the Fund continued to
trade profitably as trending prices in a number of key markets favorably
impacted the Fund's performance. In September heating oil hit a five-year high
on soaring prices in Europe, and the Fund was also able to capitalize on
downward trends in the metals markets. Strong trends in the currency and global
bond markets produced significant gains in October and November, but the year
ended with declining performance as December witnessed the reversal of several
strong upward trends and increased volatility in key markets.
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
The principal variables which determine the net performance of the
Partnership are gross profitability and interest income. During all periods set
forth under "Selected Financial Data," the interest rates in many countries were
at unusually low levels. This negatively impacted revenues because interest
income is typically a major component of commodity pool profitability. In
addition, low interest rates are frequently associated with reduced fixed-income
market volatility, and in static markets the Fund's profit potential generally
tends to be diminished. On the other hand, during periods of higher interest
rates, the relative attractiveness of a high risk investment such as the
Partnership may be reduced as compared to high yielding and much lower risk
fixed-income investments.
-12-
<PAGE>
The Partnership's Brokerage Commissions and Administrative Fees are a
constant percentage of assets charge. The only Fund costs (other than the
insignificant F/X Desk service fees and EFP differentials) which are not based
on a percentage of the Fund's assets are the Profit Shares payable to the
Trading Advisors on an Advisor-by-Advisor basis. During periods when Profit
Shares are a high percentage of net trading gains, it is likely that there has
been substantial performance non-correlation among the Advisors (so that the
total Profit Shares paid to those Advisors which have traded profitably are a
high percentage, or perhaps even in excess, of the total profits recognized, as
other Advisors have incurred offsetting losses, reducing overall trading gains
but not the Profit Shares paid to the successful Advisors) - suggesting the
likelihood of generally trendless, non-consensus markets.
The events that primarily determine the Fund's profitability are those
that produce sustained and major price movements. The Advisors are generally
more likely to be able to profit from sustained trends, irrespective of their
direction, than from static markets. During the course of the Partnership's
performance to date, such events have ranged from Federal Reserve Board
reductions in interest rates, the apparent refusal of Iraq to arrive at a
settlement which would permit it to sell oil internationally, the inability of
the U.S. government to agree upon a federal budget and a combination of drought
and excessive rain negatively impacting U.S. agricultural harvesting as well as
planting. While these events are representative of the type of circumstances
which materially affect the Fund, the specific events which will do so in the
future cannot be predicted or identified.
Unlike many investment fields, there is no meaningful distinction in the
operation of the Fund between realized and unrealized profits. Most of the
contracts traded by the Fund are highly liquid and can be closed out at any
time. Furthermore, the profits on many open positions are effectively realized
on a daily basis through the payment of variation margin.
Except in unusual circumstances, factors - regulatory approvals, cost of
goods sold, employee relations and the like - which often materially affect an
operating business have virtually no impact on the Fund.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Fund's costs are generally proportional to its asset base, and,
within broad ranges of capitalization, the Advisor's trading positions (and
resulting gains and losses) should increase or decrease in approximate
proportion to the size of the Fund account managed by each of them,
respectively.
Inflation per se is not a significant factor in the Fund's
profitability, although inflationary cycles can give rise to the type of major
price movements that can have a materially favorable or adverse impact on the
Fund's performance.
In its trading to date, the Fund has from time to time had substantial
unrealized gains and losses on its open positions. These gains or losses are
paid on a periodic basis as part of the routine clearing cycle on exchanges or
in the over-the-counter markets (the only over-the-counter market in which the
Fund trades is the inter-bank forward market in currencies). In highly unusual
circumstances, market illiquidity could make it difficult for certain Advisors
to close out open positions, and any such illiquidity could expose the Fund to
significant losses, or cause it to be unable to recognize unrealized gains.
However, in general, there is no meaningful difference between the Fund's
realized and unrealized gains.
In terms of cash flow, it makes little difference whether a market
position remains open (so that the profit or loss on such positions remains
unrealized), as cash settlement of unrealized gains and losses occurs
periodically whether or not positions are closed out. The only meaningful
difference between realized and unrealized gains or losses in the case of the
Fund is that unrealized items reflect gains or losses on positions which the
Advisors have determined not to close out (presumably, in the hope of future
profits), whereas realized gains or losses reflect amounts received or paid in
respect of positions no longer being maintained.
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
-------------------------------------------
The financial statements required by this Item are included in Exhibit
13.01.
The supplementary financial information ("selected quarterly financial
data" and "information about oil and gas producing activities") specified by
Item 302 of Regulation S-K is not applicable.
-13-
<PAGE>
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
---------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
- --------------------
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on
accounting and financial disclosure.
PART III
ITEM 10: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
- ------------------------------------------------------------
(a,b) Identification of Directors and Executive Officers:
--------------------------------------------------
As a limited partnership, the Partnership itself has no
officers or directors and is managed by the General Partner. Trading decisions
are made by the Trading Advisors on behalf of the Partnership.
The principal officers of MLIP and their business backgrounds
are as follows.
John R. Frawley, Jr. Chief Executive Officer, President
and Director
James M. Bernard Chief Financial Officer,
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Jeffrey F. Chandor Senior Vice President, Director of
Sales, Marketing and Research and
Director
Allen N. Jones Chairman and Director
Steven B. Olgin Vice President, Secretary and
Director of Administration
John R. Frawley, Jr. was born in 1943. Mr. Frawley is Chief
Executive Officer, President and a Director of MLIP as well as Co-Chairman of
MLF. He joined Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith ("MLPF&S") in 1966 and has
served in various positions, including Retail and Institutional Sales, Manager
of New York Institutional Sales, Director of Institutional Marketing, Senior
Vice President of Merrill Lynch Capital Markets, and Director of International
Institutional Sales. Mr. Frawley holds a Bachelor of Science degree from
Canisius College. Mr. Frawley served on the CFTC's Regulatory Coordination
Advisory Committee from its inception in 1990 through its dissolution in 1994.
Mr. Frawley is currently a member of the CFTC's Financial Products Advisory
Committee. In January 1996, he was re-elected to a one-year term as Chairman of
the Managed Futures Association, the national trade association of the United
States managed futures industry. Mr. Frawley is also a Director of that
organization, and a Director of the Futures Industry Institute. Mr. Frawley also
currently serves on a panel created by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and The
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago to study cooperative efforts related to
electronic trading, common clearing and the issues regarding a potential merger.
James M. Bernard was born in 1950. Mr. Bernard is Chief
Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer of MLIP. He joined MLF in
1983. Before that he was the Commodity Controller for Nabisco Brands Inc. from
November 1976 to 1982 and a Supervisor at Ernst & Whinney from 1972 to November
1976. Mr. Bernard is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants and holds a Bachelor of Science degree from St. John's University
and a Master of Business Administration degree from Fordham University.
Jeffrey F. Chandor was born in 1942. Mr. Chandor is Senior Vice
President, the Director of Sales, Marketing and Research and a Director of MLIP.
He joined MLPF&S in 1971 and has served as the Product Manager of Equity,
Derivative Products and Mortgage-Backed Securities as well as Managing Director
of International Sales in the United States, and Managing Director of Sales in
Europe. Mr. Chandor holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Trinity College,
Hartford, Connecticut.
-14-
<PAGE>
Allen N. Jones was born in 1942. Mr. Jones is Chairman and a Director
of MLIP. Mr. Jones graduated from the University of Arkansas with a Bachelor of
Science, Business Administration degree in 1964. Since June 1992, Mr. Jones has
held the position of Senior Vice President of MLPF&S. From June 1992 through
February 1994, Mr. Jones was the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Merrill Lynch Insurance Group, Inc. ("MLIG") and remains on the Board of
Directors of MLIG and its subsidiary companies. In February 1994, Mr. Jones
became the Director of Individual Financial Services of the Merrill Lynch
Private Client Group. From January 1992 to June 1992, he held the position of
First Vice President of MLPF&S. From January 1990 to June 1992, he held the
position of District Director of MLPF&S. Before January 1990, he held the
position of Senior Regional Vice President of MLPF&S.
Steven B. Olgin was born in 1960. Mr. Olgin is Vice President,
Secretary and the Director of Administration of MLIP. He joined MLIP in July
1994 and became a Vice President in July 1995. From 1986 until July 1994, Mr.
Olgin was an associate of the law firm of Sidley & Austin. In 1982, Mr. Olgin
graduated from The American University with a Bachelor of Science degree in
Business Administration and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics. In 1986, he
received his Juris Doctor degree from The John Marshall Law School. Mr. Olgin
is a member of the Managed Futures Association's Government Relations Committee
and has served as an arbitrator for the NFA.
At its December 1996 Board of Directors meeting, MLIP formed a Finance
Committee composed of representatives of several different operating and
administrative units at Merrill Lynch to oversee the financial controls and
accounting procedures implemented by MLIP. The Finance Committee will meet
periodically to review MLIP's financial reporting, monitoring and record
keeping, as well as all proposed changes - other than the selection of Advisors
- - affecting the operations of the Fund.
As of December 31, 1996, the principals of MLIP had no investment in
the Fund, and MLIP's general partner interest in the Fund was valued at
$758,780.
MLIP acts as general partner to thirteen public futures funds whose
units of limited partnership interest are registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: The Futures Expansion Fund Limited Partnership, The
Growth and Guarantee Fund L.P., ML Futures Investments II L.P., ML Futures
Investments L.P., John W. Henry & Co./Millburn L.P., The S.E.C.T.O.R. Strategy
Fund /(SM)/ L.P., The SECTOR Strategy Fund /(SM)/ II L.P., The SECTOR Strategy
Fund /(SM)/ IV L.P., The SECTOR Strategy Fund /(SM)/ V L.P., ML Global Horizons
L.P., ML Principal Protection L.P. (formerly, ML Principal Protection Plus
L.P.), ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund L.P. and the Fund. Because MLIP serves
as the sole general partner of each of these funds, the officers and directors
of MLIP effectively manage them as officers and directors of such funds.
(c) Identification of Certain Significant Employees:
-----------------------------------------------
None.
(d) Family Relationships:
--------------------
None.
(e) Business Experience:
-------------------
See Item 10(a)(b) above.
(f) Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings:
----------------------------------------
None.
(g) Promoters and Control Persons:
-----------------------------
The General Partner is the sole promoter and controlling person of the
Partnership.
-15-
<PAGE>
ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
----------------------
The officers of the General Partner are remunerated in their respective
positions. The Partnership does not itself have any officers, directors or
employees. The Partnership pays Brokerage Commissions to an affiliate of the
General Partner and Administrative Fees to the General Partner. The General
Partner or its affiliates may also receive certain economic benefits from
holding the Fund's dollar Available Assets in offset accounts, as described in
Item 1(c) above. The directors and officers receive no "other compensation" from
the Partnership, and the directors receive no compensation for serving as
directors of the General Partner. There are no compensation plans or
arrangements relating to a change in control of either the Partnership or the
General Partner.
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners:
-----------------------------------------------
As of December 31, 1996, no person or "group" is known to be or
have been the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Units. All of
the Partnership's units of general partnership interest are owned by the General
Partner.
(b) Security Ownership of Management:
--------------------------------
As of December 31, 1996, the General Partner owned 6,971 Units
(unit-equivalent general partnership interests), which was less than 3% of the
total Units outstanding.
(c) Changes in Control:
------------------
None.
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
----------------------------------------------
(a) Transactions with Management and Others:
---------------------------------------
The General Partner acts as administrative and trading manager of
the Fund. The General Partner provides all normal ongoing administrative
functions of the Partnership, such as accounting, legal and printing services.
The General Partner, which receives the Administrative Fees, pays all expenses
relating to such services.
(b) Certain Business Relationships:
------------------------------
MLF, an affiliate of the General Partner, acts as the principal
commodity broker for the Partnership.
In 1996 the Partnership paid: (i) Brokerage Commissions of
$2,243,462 to the Commodity Broker, which included $661,249 in consulting fees
paid by the Commodity Broker to the Trading Advisors; and (ii) Administrative
Fees of $57,524 to MLIP. In addition, MLIP and its affiliates may have derived
certain economic benefits from maintaining a portion of the Fund's assets in
"offset accounts," as described under Item 1(c), "Narrative Description of
Business -Use of Proceeds and Interest Income - Interest Earned on the Fund's
U.S. Dollar Available Assets" and "Executive Compensation" herein, as well as
from the Fund's F/X Desk and "exchange of futures for physical" ("EFP") trading.
See Item 1(c), "Narrative Description of Business - Charges" for a
discussion of other business dealings between MLIP affiliates and the
Partnership.
(c) Indebtedness of Management:
--------------------------
The Partnership is prohibited from making any loans, to management
or otherwise.
-16-
<PAGE>
(d) Transactions with Promoters:
---------------------------
Not applicable.
PART IV
ITEM 14: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
---------------------------------------------------------------
(a)1. Financial Statements (found in Exhibit 13.01): Page
--------------------------------------------- ----
Independent Auditors' Report 1
Statements of Financial Condition as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 2
__
For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994:
Statements of Income 3
Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital 4
Notes to Financial Statements 5-13
(a)2. Financial Statement Schedules:
-----------------------------
Financial statement schedules not included in this Form 10-K have
been omitted for the reason that they are not required or are not applicable or
that equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or
notes thereto.
(a)3. Exhibits:
--------
The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are filed
herewith to this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Designation Description
- ----------- -----------
3.01(i) Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the
Partnership.
Exhibit 3.01(i): Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
- ---------------- 3.01(i) contained in Amendment No. 1 (as Exhibit A) to the
Registration Statement (File No. 33-62474) filed on June 28,
1993, on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
"Registrant's Registration Statement").
3.02(ii) Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership
of the Registrant, dated July 27, 1995.
Exhibit 3.02(ii): Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
- --------------- 3.02(iii) contained in the Registrant's report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1995.
10.01(g) Form of Advisory Agreement between the Partnership, Merrill
Lynch Investment Partners Inc., Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.
and each Trading Advisor.
Exhibit 10.01(g): Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.01(g)
- ---------------- contained in the Registrant's report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended June 30, 1995.
10.02 Form of Consulting Agreement between each the Partnership
and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.
-17-
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.02: Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.02
- ------------- contained in the Registrant's Registration Statement.
10.03 Form of Customer Agreement between the Partnership and
Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.
Exhibit 10.03: Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
- ------------- 10.03 contained in the Registrant's Registration Statement.
10.05 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Guarantee.
Exhibit 10.05: Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.05
- ------------- contained in the Registrant's Registration Statement.
10.07 Foreign Exchange Desk Service Agreement among Merrill Lynch
Investment Bank, Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.,
Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. and the Fund.
Exhibit 10.07: Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.07
- ------------- contained in the Registrant's Registration Statement.
10.08(a) Form of Advisory and Consulting Agreement Amendment among
Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc., each Advisor, the Fund
and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.
Exhibit 10.08(a): Is filed herewith.
- ----------------
10.08(b) Form of Amendment to the Customer Agreement among the
Partnership and MLF.
Exhibit 10.08(b): Is filed herewith.
- ----------------
13.01 1996 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report.
Exhibit 13.01: Is filed herewith.
- -------------
28.01 Prospectus of the Partnership dated June 29, 1993.
Exhibit 28.01: Is incorporated by reference as filed with the Securities
- ------------- and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424 under the
Securities Act of 1933, Registration Statement (File No. 33-
62474) on Form S-1.
(b) Report on Form 8-K:
------------------
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of 1996.
-18-
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND /(SM)/ VI L.P.
By:MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
General Partner
By:/s/ John R. Frawley, Jr.
------------------------
John R. Frawley, Jr.
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on March 14, 1997 by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
- --------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ John R. Frawley, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer and Director March 14, 1997
- --------------------------
John R. Frawley, Jr.
/s/ James M. Bernard Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer (Principal Financial March 14, 1997
- --------------------------
James M. Bernard and Accounting Officer) and Senior Vice President
/s/ Jeffrey F. Chandor Senior Vice President and Director of Sales, March 14, 1997
- --------------------------
Jeffrey F. Chandor Marketing and Research, and Director
/s/ Allen N. Jones Director March 14, 1997
- --------------------------
Allen N. Jones
</TABLE>
(Being the principal executive officer, the principal financial and accounting
officer and a majority of the directors of Merrill Lynch Investment Partners
Inc.)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C>
MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT General Partner of Registrant March 14, 1997
PARTNERS INC.
</TABLE>
By: /s/ John R. Frawley, Jr.
----------------------------
John R. Frawley, Jr.
-19-
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND /(SM)/ VI L.P.
1996 FORM 10-K
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
-----------------
Exhibit
-------
Exhibit 10.08(a) Form of Advisory and Consulting Agreement Amendment
by and among Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.,
each Advisor, the Fund and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.
Exhibit 10.08(b) Form of Amendment to the Customer Agreement among the
Partnership and MLF
Exhibit 13.01 1996 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report
-20-
<PAGE>
To the best of the knowledge and belief of the
undersigned, the information contained in
this report is accurate and complete.
James M. Bernard
Chief Financial Officer
Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.
General Partner of
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND /(SM)/ VI L.P.
-21-
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.08(a)
<PAGE>
FORM OF ADVISORY AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
This ADVISORY AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT dated as of January 1,
1997 by and among the funds listed on Schedule I hereto (THE "FUNDS"),
________________ (THE "ADVISOR"), MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
("MLIP") and MERRILL LYNCH FUTURES INC. ("MLF")
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Advisor is acting as a commodity trading advisor for the Funds
pursuant to the Advisory Agreements, and in certain cases the Consulting
Agreements, among the parties hereto (as the case may be) set forth on Schedule
II hereto (collectively. the "Advisory Agreements");
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to reduce the Consulting Fees paid
by MLF, the commodity broker of the Fund, to the Advisor;
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to adjust the Profit Share paid by
the Fund to the Advisor, including, without limitation, by providing that the
Profit Share shall be calculated on an annual rather than a quarterly basis; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement shall be deemed to renew each of the Advisory
Agreements (on the terms set forth herein and therein) until December 31, 1997.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. REDUCTION OF CONSULTING FEE
---------------------------
Beginning January 1, 1997, the Consulting Fee paid by MLF to the Advisor
will be reduced to ___% per annum (0.___% of the month-end assets each month).
2. ADJUSTMENT OF PROFIT SHARE
--------------------------
From and after January 1, 1997, the Profit Share payable by the Funds to
the Advisor will be calculated at the rate of ___% of any New Trading Profit in
excess of the highest level of cumulative Trading Profit (the "high water mark")
achieved by the Advisor for each of the Funds, respectively, as of any previous
calendar quarter-end (including December 31, 1996); or $0 if the Advisor has
traded unprofitably for a Fund. Trading Profit shall be calculated pursuant to
Schedule C to the Advisory Agreements, after reduction for combined Brokerage
and Administrative Fees of ___% of average month-end assets per annum (0.__% of
the month-end assets each month). Further more, beginning January 1, 1997,
Profit Shares shall be calculated not as of the end of each calendar quarter,
but rather as of the end of each calendar year and the "high water mark" for
purposes of determining whether Trading Profit recognized after January 1, 1997
constitutes New Trading Profit
<PAGE>
will equal the highest level of cumulative Trading Profit as of any calendar
year-end (at such point, if any, that cumulative Trading Profit as of a calendar
year-end exceeds the "high water mark" in effect with respect to each Fund as of
the effective date of this Agreement).
3. TERM
----
The current term of the Advisory Agreements will expire December 31,
1997, at which time each such Advisory Agreement will be automatically renewed,
unless (i) MLIP or one or more of the Funds gives 30 days' notice to the Advisor
of the termination of such Advisory Agreement, or (ii) from and after the end of
the period during which such Advisory Agreement may be renewed at the option of
either MLIP or the affected Fund (treating the term ending December 31, 1997 as
the current twelve month term of each such Advisory Agreement) the Advisor gives
30 days' termination notice.
Any renewal rights exercisable by one or more Funds or MLIP under the
Advisory Agreements shall remain in full force and effect as if December 31,
1997 were the end of the current twelve-month term of each such Advisory
Agreement.
4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
----------------
This Agreement, together with the Advisory Agreements, constitutes the
entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the matters referred
to herein, and no other agreement, verbal or otherwise, shall be binding as
between the parties unless it shall be in writing and signed by the part against
whom enforcement is sought.
-2-
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereto duly set forth their hand
as of the 1st day of January 1997.
THE FUNDS LISTED ON SCHEDULE I
WHICH ARE U.S. LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
By: MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT
PARTNERS INC.
General Partner
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
THE FUNDS LISTED ON SCHEDULE I,
OTHER THAN ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION
PLUS LTD., WHICH ARE CAYMAN ISLANDS
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION PLUS LTD.
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
MERRILL LYNCH FUTURES INC.
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
THE ADVISOR MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS,
INC.
By: ___________________________ By: ________________________________
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
-3-
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE I
THE FUNDS
U.S. Funds Cayman Islands Funds
---------- --------------------
1. 1.
--------------------------- ---------------------------
2. 2.
--------------------------- ---------------------------
3. 3.
--------------------------- ---------------------------
4. 4.
--------------------------- ---------------------------
-4-
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II
ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Advisory Agreements with the U.S. Funds dated:
U.S. Fund No.
(See Schedule I)
----------------
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
Advisory Agreements with the Cayman Islands Funds dated:
Cayman Islands
Fund No.
(See Schedule I)
----------------
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.08(b)
<PAGE>
FORM OF
AMENDMENT
TO THE
CUSTOMER AGREEMENT
This Customer Agreement Amendment ("Amendment") is made as of this 1st day
of [MONTH, YEAR] by and between [THE FUND] (the "Fund") and Merrill Lynch
Futures Inc.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Customer Agreement relating to
the purchase and sale of commodity futures and forward contracts and commodity
options (the "Customer Agreement");
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to reduce the brokerage commissions
paid by the Fund to Merrill Lynch Futures Inc., the Fund's commodity broker,
pursuant to the Customer Agreement and wish to amend the Customer Agreement
accordingly;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
contained in the Customer Agreement and herein, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Customer
Agreement as follows:
1. Brokerage Commissions. Beginning [DATE, YEAR] the brokerage commissions
---------------------
payable by the Fund to Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. will be reduced to ______ of
1% of month-end Net Assets, before reduction for such monthly brokerage
commissions and any New Profits Account allocation but after the crediting of
interest income received during the month (a ____% annual rate). Such brokerage
commissions shall not include any administrative fee paid directly to Merrill
Lynch Investment Partners Inc.
2. Amendment. This Amendment may not be amended except by the written
---------
consent of each of the parties hereto.
3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more
------------
counterparts, each of which shall, however, together constitute one and the same
documents.
-1-
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties
hereto as of the day and year first above written.
[THE FUND]
BY: MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT
PARTNERS INC., General Partner
BY: ________________________________
Name:
Title:
MERRILL LYNCH FUTURES INC.
BY: ________________________________
Name:
Title:
-2-
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND/SM/ VI L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Financial Statements for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
and Independent Auditors' Report
<PAGE>
To: The Limited Partners of The SECTOR Strategy Fund/SM/ VI L.P.
The SECTOR Strategy Fund/SM/ VI L.P. (the "Fund") ended its fourth fiscal year
of trading on December 31, 1996 with a Net Asset Value ("NAV") per Unit of
$108.85, representing an increase of 4.62% from the December 31, 1995 NAV per
Unit of $104.04. During the fiscal year, trading profits were generated in the
interest rate, currency and energy sectors while losses were incurred in the
metals, agriculture and stock index sectors.
In 1996, strong price trends prevailed in several key markets enabling the
Fund's Trading Advisors to trade profitably for the Fund. Although trading in
stock index and agricultural commodity markets may have been lackluster, the
global bond and currency markets offered substantial trading opportunities.
Interest rate and currency price trends resulted in profitable trading
opportunities in these markets throughout the year.
As the new year began, the U.S. dollar rallied throughout most of January, after
being locked in a tight trading range for the two prior months. However, the
dollar weakened against major currencies in February, and returned to a
relatively narrow trading range. In March, crude oil prices rose throughout most
of the month, as unusually cold weather in the U.S. and Europe resulted in an
extended period of strong demand and oil talks between the United Nations and
Iraq were suspended.
During April, grain and soybean prices rallied to new highs, sometimes daily, as
adverse weather conditions and strong demand affected prices. Difficult trading
conditions in many markets prevailed and a lack of clear price trends in key
markets negatively impacted the Fund's performance in May and June. For example,
U.S. bond markets remained trendless as continued volatility, reflected investor
confusion over conflicting reports on the direction of the economy.
As the third quarter of 1996 began, it was the U.S. stock market that
experienced increased volatility coupled with sharp declines in July. In the
currency markets, the U.S. dollar posted its biggest one-day gain against the
Deutsche mark in almost four months on August 14, after comments from the
Bundesbank's chief economist encouraged expectations for lower German interest
rates. In September, crude oil prices continued, as they had during the summer,
to trend upward throughout most of the month.
Despite continued price volatility during the final quarter of 1996, the Fund's
Trading Advisors were able to single out trends in key markets, such as the
world's major bond markets which rallied into October and November.
Additionally, price trends prevailed in several major foreign currency markets,
for instance, the British pound extended its rally into November, as it soared
to a 4-year high against the U.S. dollar and a 29-month high against the
Deutsche mark on November 20. In December, however, the world's major bond
market rallies came to an abrupt halt early in the month. Specifically, U.S.
Treasury prices dropped on reports of strength in the economy, as well as a
weaker dollar which further encouraged investor selling of treasury securities.
<PAGE>
Although the Fund was profitable overall in 1996, we look for improved
performance in the coming year. To that end, we will continue to work diligently
with the Trading Advisors to meet the Fund's objective of achieving, through
speculative trading, substantial capital appreciation over time. We look forward
to 1997 and the trading opportunities it may bring.
Sincerely,
John R. Frawley, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.
(General Partner)
FUTURES TRADING IS SPECULATIVE AND INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. PAST
PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND/SM/ VI L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994:
Statements of Financial Condition 2
Statements of Operations 3
Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital 4
Notes to Financial Statements 5-13
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners of
The SECTOR Strategy Fund/SM/ VI L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of The SECTOR
Strategy Fund/SM/ VI L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) as of December 31,
1996 and 1995 and the related statements of operations and of changes in
partners' capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of The SECTOR Strategy Fund/SM/ VI L.P. (a
Delaware limited partnership) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the results
of its operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
February 3, 1997
New York, New York
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND/SM/ VI L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS 1996 1995
- ------ ---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Accrued interest (Note 2) $ 93,352 $ 221,036
Equity in commodity futures trading accounts:
Cash and option premiums 22,269,250 51,992,222
Net unrealized profit on open contracts 60,210 2,515,186
Investments (Note 6) 8,288,948 -
Receivable from investments (Note 6) 1,278,557 -
----------- -----------
TOTAL $31,990,317 $54,728,444
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
- ---------------------------------
LIABILITIES:
Redemptions payable $ 928,164 $ 3,684,264
Brokerage commissions payable (Note 2) 69,505 295,137
Administrative fees payable (Note 2) 1,782 -
Profit shares payable (Note 3) 43,959 318,030
----------- -----------
Total liabilities 1,043,410 4,297,431
----------- -----------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
General Partner (6,971 units and 6,971 units) 758,780 723,241
Limited Partners (277,342 units and 477,746 units) 30,188,127 49,707,772
----------- -----------
Total partners' capital 30,946,907 50,431,013
----------- -----------
TOTAL $31,990,317 $54,728,444
=========== ===========
NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT $108.85 $104.04
======= =======
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements.
-2-
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND/SM/ VI L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUES: 1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Trading profits (loss):
Realized $4,174,847 $ 9,810,089 $ 64,289
Change in unrealized (2,454,976) (2,396,610) 3,288,186
----------- ------------ -------------
Total trading results 1,719,871 7,413,479 3,352,475
Interest income (Note 2) 1,661,887 4,001,380 3,643,283
----------- ------------ -------------
Total revenues 3,381,758 11,414,859 6,995,758
----------- ------------ -------------
EXPENSES:
Profit shares (Note 3) 434,053 1,086,165 721,999
Brokerage commissions (Note 2) 2,243,462 5,771,415 6,822,213
Administrative fees (Note 2) 57,524 - -
----------- ------------ -------------
Total expenses 2,735,039 6,857,580 7,544,212
----------- ------------ -------------
INCOME FROM INVESTMENTS (Note 6) 984,327 - -
----------- ------------ -------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $1,631,046 $ 4,557,279 $ (548,454)
=========== ============ =============
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT:
Weighted average number of units
outstanding (Note 4) 362,917 786,097 1,037,931
======= ======= =========
Net income per weighted average
General Partner and Limited
Partner Unit $4.49 $5.80 $(.53)
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements.
-3-
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND/SM/ VI L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limited General
Units Partners Partner Total
----- -------- ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
DECEMBER 31, 1993 1,079,065 $103,258,986 $1,939,298 $105,198,284
Net loss - (531,378) (17,076) (548,454)
Redemptions (119,615) (10,712,258) (750,360) (11,462,618)
---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
DECEMBER 31, 1994 959,450 92,015,350 1,171,862 93,187,212
Net income - 4,505,266 52,013 4,557,279
Organization and initial
offering cost recovery - 3,938 51 3,989
Redemptions (474,733) (46,816,782) (500,685) (47,317,467)
---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
DECEMBER 31, 1995 484,717 49,707,772 723,241 50,431,013
Net income - 1,595,507 35,539 1,631,046
Redemptions (200,404) (21,115,152) - (21,115,152)
---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL,
DECEMBER 31, 1996 284,313 $ 30,188,127 $ 758,780 $ 30,946,907
========== ============ ========== ============
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements.
-4-
<PAGE>
THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND/SM/ VI L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
------------------------------
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
------------
The SECTOR Strategy Fund/SM/ VI L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized
under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act on April 23,
1993 and commenced trading activities on September 10, 1993. The
Partnership engages in the speculative trading of futures, options on
futures and forward contracts on a wide range of commodities. Merrill
Lynch Investment Partners Inc. (formerly ML Futures Investment Partners
Inc.) ("MLIP" or the "General Partner"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Merrill Lynch Group Inc. which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. ("Merrill Lynch"), is the general partner of the
Partnership and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. ("MLF"), also a Merrill Lynch
affiliate, is its commodity broker. The General Partner has agreed to
maintain a general partnership interest in the Partnership equal to 1% of
the total capital in the Partnership. The General Partner and each Limited
Partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion
to their respective interests in it.
MLIP selects independent advisors (the "Advisors" or the "Trading
Advisors") to manage the Partnership's assets, and allocates and
reallocates the Partnership's trading assets among existing, replacement
and additional Advisors.
MLIP also determines what percentage of the Partnership's total capital to
allocate to trading from time to time, attempting to balance the
desirability of reducing the opportunity costs of the Partnership's
"principal protection" structure by allocating 100% (or more) of the
Partnership's assets to trading against the necessity of preventing
Merrill Lynch from ever being required to make any payments to the
Partnership under the Merrill Lynch guarantee (see Note 5).
Estimates
---------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue Recognition
-------------------
Commodity futures, options on futures and forward contract transactions
are recorded on the trade date and open contracts are reflected in net
unrealized profit (loss) on open contracts in the Statements of Financial
Condition at the difference between the original contract amount and the
fair value. The change in net unrealized profit (loss) on open contracts
from one period to the next is reflected in change in unrealized in the
Statements of Operations. Fair value is based on quoted market prices on
the exchange or market on which the contract is traded.
-5-
<PAGE>
Organization and Initial Offering Costs, Operating Expenses and Selling
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Commissions
-----------
The General Partner advanced all organization and initial offering costs
relating to the Partnership. The Partnership reimbursed the General
Partner for such costs over a two-year period in 24 equal monthly
installments. For financial reporting purposes, the Partnership has
deducted the total organizational and initial offering costs of $1,000,000
from Partners' capital at inception. For all other purposes, including
determining the Net Asset Value per Unit for redemption purposes, the
Partnership deducted organization and offering cost reimbursement only as
actually paid.
The General Partner pays for all routine operating costs (including legal,
accounting, printing, postage and similar administrative expenses) of the
Partnership. The General Partner receives an administrative fee as well as
a portion of the brokerage commissions paid to MLF by the Partnership as
reimbursement for the foregoing expenses.
No selling commissions have been or are paid by Limited Partners.
Income Taxes
------------
No provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial
statements as each Partner is individually responsible for reporting
income or loss based on such Partner's respective share of the
Partnership's income and expenses as reported for income tax purposes.
Distributions
-------------
The Unitholders are entitled to receive, equally per Unit, any
distribution which may be made by the Partnership. No such distributions
had been made as of December 31, 1996.
Redemptions
-----------
A Limited Partner may require the Partnership to redeem some or all of
such Partner's Units at the Net Asset Value as of the close of business on
the last business day of any month upon ten calendar days' notice. Units
redeemed during the four successive six-month periods ending after the
Partnership commenced trading with respect to each series of Units were
assessed early redemption charges of 4%, 3%, 2% and 1%, respectively, of
their Net Asset Value as of the date of redemption.
Dissolution of the Partnership
------------------------------
The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2023 or at an earlier date
if certain conditions occur, as well as under certain other circumstances
as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
2. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Partnership's U.S. dollar-denominated assets are held at MLF in cash
or short-term Treasury bills. The Partnership receives all interest paid
on such Treasury bills. On the cash held at MLF, the Partnership receives
interest from Merrill Lynch at rates ranging from .50 of 1% per annum
below the prevailing 91-day Treasury bill rate up to the full prevailing
91-day Treasury bill rate. Merrill Lynch may derive certain economic
benefits, in excess of the interest which Merrill Lynch pays to the
Partnership, from possession of such cash.
-6-
<PAGE>
Merrill Lynch credits the Partnership with interest on the Partnership's
non-U.S. dollar-denominated available assets based on local short-term
rates. Merrill Lynch charges the Partnership Merrill Lynch's cost of
financing realized and unrealized losses on the Partnership's non-U.S.
dollar-denominated positions.
The Partnership paid brokerage commissions to MLF, a flat monthly rate
equal to .833 of 1% (a 10% annual rate) of the Partnership's month-end Net
Assets allocated to trading. Effective January 1, 1996, the percentage was
reduced to .813 of 1% (a 9.75% annual rate) of the Partnership's month-end
assets allocated to trading and the Partnership began to pay MLIP a
monthly administrative fee of .021 of 1% (a .25% annual rate) of the
month-end assets allocated to trading (this recharacterization had no
economic effect on the Partnership). Assets allocated to trading are not
reduced for purposes of calculating brokerage commissions and
administrative fees, by any accrued brokerage commissions, administrative
fees, profit shares or other fees or charges.
The General Partner estimates that the round-turn equivalent commission
rate charged to the Partnership during the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994 was approximately $86, $100 and $27, respectively (not
including, in calculating round-turn equivalents, forward contracts on a
futures-equivalent basis).
MLF pays the Advisors annual Consulting Fees ranging up to 4% of the
Partnership's average month-end assets allocated to them for management,
after reduction for brokerage commissions.
The Partnership trades forward contracts through a Foreign Exchange
Service Desk (the "F/X Desk") established by MLIP that contacts at least
two counterparties, along with Merrill Lynch International Bank ("MLIB")
for all of the Partnership's currency trades. All counterparties other
than MLIB are unaffiliated with any Merrill Lynch entity. The F/X Desk
charges a service fee equal (at current exchange rates) to approximately
$5.00 to $12.50 on each purchase or sale of a futures-contract equivalent
face amount of a foreign currency. No service fees are charged on trades
awarded to MLIB (which receives a "bid-ask" spread on such trades). MLIB
is awarded trades only if its price (which includes no service charge) is
equal to or better than the best price (including the service fee) offered
by any of the other counterparties contacted.
The F/X Desk trades on the basis of credit lines provided by a Merrill
Lynch entity. The Partnership is not required to margin or otherwise
guarantee its F/X Desk trading.
Certain of the Partnership's currency trades are executed in the form of
"exchange of futures for physical" ("EFP") transactions involving MLIB and
MLF. In these transactions, a spot or forward (collectively referred to as
"cash") currency position is acquired and exchanged for an equivalent
futures position on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's International
Monetary Market. In its EFP trading, the Partnership acquires cash
currency positions through the F/X Desk in the same manner and on the same
terms as in the case of the Partnership's other F/X Desk trading. When the
Partnership exchanges these positions for futures, there is a
"differential" between the prices of these two positions. This
"differential" reflects, in part, the different settlement dates of the
cash and the futures contracts as well as prevailing interest rates, but
also includes a pricing spread in favor of MLIB or another Merrill Lynch
entity.
The Partnership's F/X Desk service fee and EFP differential costs have, to
date, totaled no more than .25 of 1% per annum of the Partnership's
average month-end Net Assets.
-7-
<PAGE>
3. AGREEMENTS
The Partnership and the Advisors have each entered into Advisory
Agreements. The Advisory Agreements generally terminate one year after
they are entered into, subject to certain renewal rights exercisable by
the Partnership. The Advisors determine the commodity futures and forward
contract trades to be made on behalf of their respective Partnership
accounts, subject to certain trading policies and to certain rights
reserved for the General Partner.
In the case of Trading LLCs, as defined in Note 6, the Trading LLCs
entered the Advisory Agreements with the Advisors.
Profit shares, generally ranging from 15% to 25% of any New Trading
Profit, as defined, recognized by each Advisor considered individually
irrespective of the overall performance of the Partnership, as of the end
of each calendar quarter are paid to each of the Advisors. Profit shares
are also paid out in respect of Units redeemed as of the end of interim
months during a calendar quarter, to the extent of the applicable
percentage of any such New Trading Profit attributable to such Units.
4. WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNITS
The weighted average number of Units outstanding was computed for purposes
of disclosing net income per weighted average Unit. The weighted average
number of Units outstanding at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 equals the
Units outstanding as of such date, adjusted proportionately for Units
redeemed based on the respective length of time each was outstanding
during the such period.
5. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. GUARANTEE
Merrill Lynch has guaranteed to the Partnership that it will have
sufficient Net Assets as of the Principal Assurance Date, as defined, that
the Net Asset Value per Unit as of such Principal Assurance Date will
equal, after adjustment for all liabilities to third parties, not less
than $100.
6. INVESTMENTS
The Partnership places assets under the management of certain of the
Advisors not through opening managed accounts with them but rather through
investing in private limited liability companies ("Trading LLCs")
sponsored by MLIP. The only members of the Trading LLCs are commodity
pools sponsored by MLIP. Each Trading LLC trades under the management of a
single Advisor pursuant to a single strategy and at a uniform degree of
leverage. Placing assets with an Advisor through investing in a Trading
LLC rather than a managed account has no economic effect on the
Partnership, except to the extent that the Partnership benefits from the
Advisor not having to allocate trades among a number of different accounts
(rather than acquiring a single position for the Trading LLC as a whole).
The investments are reflected in the financial statements at fair value
based upon the Partnership's interest in each Trading LLC. Fair value is
equal to the market value of the net assets of the Trading LLCs. The
resulting difference between cost and fair value is reflected on the
Statement of Operations as income or loss from investments.
At December 31, 1996 the Partnership had an investment in the ML JWH
Financial and Metals Portfolio L.L.C. ("JWH LLC") and ML Chesapeake
Diversified L.L.C. ("Chesapeake LLC").
-8-
<PAGE>
Total revenues and fees with respect to such investments are set forth as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Brokerage Administrative Profit Income from
Revenue Commissions Fees Shares Investment
---------- ------------- ---------------- -------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
JWH LLC $1,205,291 $119,551 $3,065 $154,480 $928,195
Chesapeake LLC 146,512 84,100 2,156 4,124 56,132
---------- ------------- ---------------- -------- -------------
Total $1,351,803 $203,651 $5,221 $158,604 $984,327
========== ============= ================ ======== =============
</TABLE>
7. FAIR VALUE AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The Partnership trades futures, options and forward contracts in financial
instruments, stock indices, commodities, currencies, energy and metals.
The Partnership's trading results by reporting category were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Trading Results
-------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Interest Rates $1,150,787 $5,877,387
Stock Indices (410,783) 279,104
Commodities (466,980) (779,374)
Currencies 1,103,173 4,409,558
Energy 1,410,507 1,397,675
Metals (1,066,833) (3,770,871)
------------------- ---------------------
$1,719,871 $7,413,479
=================== =====================
</TABLE>
Market Risk
-----------
Derivative financial instruments involve varying degrees of off-balance
sheet market risk, and changes in the level or volatility of interest
rates, foreign currency exchange rates or market values of the underlying
financial instruments or commodities underlying such derivative
instruments frequently result in changes in the Partnership's unrealized
profit (loss) on such derivative instruments as reflected in the
Statements of Financial Condition. The Partnership's exposure to market
risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships
among the derivative instruments held by the Partnership as well as the
volatility and liquidity of the markets in which the derivative
instruments are traded.
The General Partner has procedures in place intended to control market
risk, although there can be no assurance that they will, in fact, succeed
in doing so. The procedures focus primarily on monitoring the trading of
the Advisors selected from time to time for the Partnership, adjusting the
percentage of the Partnership's total assets allocated to trading,
calculating the Net Asset Value of the Advisors' respective Partnership
accounts as of the close of business on each day and reviewing outstanding
positions for over-concentrations--both on an Advisor-by-Advisor and on an
overall Partnership basis. While the General Partner will not itself
intervene in the markets to hedge or diversify the Partnership's market
exposure (although the General Partner does adjust the percentage of the
Partnership's total assets allocated to trading), the General Partner may
urge Advisors to reallocate positions, or itself reallocate Partnership
assets among Advisors (although typically only as of the end of a month)
in an attempt to avoid over-concentration. However, such interventions are
unusual. Except in cases in which it appears that an Advisor has begun to
deviate from past practice and trading policies or to be trading
erratically,
-9-
<PAGE>
the General Partner's basic risk control procedures consist simply of the
ongoing process of Advisor monitoring and selection, with the market risk
controls being applied by the Advisors themselves.
One important aspect of the General Partner's risk controls is its
adjustments to the leverage at which the Partnership trades. By
controlling the percentage of the Partnership's assets allocated to
trading, the General Partner can directly affect the market exposure of
the Partnership. Leverage control is the principal means by which the
General Partner hopes to be able to ensure that Merrill Lynch is never
required to make any payments under its guarantee that the Net Asset Value
per Unit will equal no less than $100 as of the Principal Assurance Date.
Deleveraged trading involves significant opportunity costs, but is
effective in controlling the risk of loss.
Fair Value
----------
The derivative instruments used in the Partnership's trading activities
are marked to market daily with the resulting unrealized profit (loss)
recorded in the Statement of Financial Condition and the related profit
(loss) reflected in trading revenues in the Statements of Operations. The
contract/notional values of open contracts as of December 31, 1996 and
1995 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------
Commitment to Commitment to Commitment to Commitment to
Purchase (Futures, Sell (Futures, Purchase (Futures, Sell (Futures,
Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Rates $19,868,322 $1,564,238 $256,222,206 $40,197,235
Stock Indices - 250,367 15,444,099 152,859
Commodities 120,648 324,279 10,022,922 1,592,560
Currencies 1,050,027 3,065,985 18,652,929 28,557,604
Energy 82,109 - 7,836,813 -
Metals 639,127 1,085,360 10,771,040 3,811,615
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
$21,760,233 $6,290,229 $318,950,009 $74,311,873
================== ================== ================== ==================
</TABLE>
Substantially all of the Partnership's derivative financial instruments
outstanding at December 31, 1996, expire within one year.
-10-
<PAGE>
The contract/notional value of the Partnership's open exchange-traded
and non-exchange-traded open derivative instrument positions as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Commitment to Commitment to Commitment to Commitment to
Purchase (Futures, Sell (Futures, Purchase (Futures, Sell (Futures,
Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Exchange
Traded $21,171,231 $5,598,019 $301,919,279 $55,897,578
Non-
Exchange-
Traded 589,002 692,210 17,030,730 18,414,295
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
$21,760,233 $6,290,229 $318,950,009 $74,311,873
================== ================== ================== ==================
</TABLE>
The average fair value of the Partnership's derivative financial
instruments positions which were open as of the end of each calendar month
during the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Commitment to Commitment to Commitment to Commitment to
Purchase (Futures, Sell (Futures, Purchase (Futures, Sell (Futures,
Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards) Options & Forwards)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Rates $ 99,859,109 $61,662,340 $226,431,553 $ 36,514,961
Stock Indices 9,556,040 2,455,672 8,650,654 6,898,187
Commodities 8,046,443 1,227,924 16,530,777 5,190,177
Currencies 21,644,329 27,211,306 61,510,231 58,498,408
Energy 3,186,493 101,599 6,458,041 1,283,541
Metals 12,593,308 6,776,261 16,223,182 12,306,169
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
$154,885,722 $99,435,102 $335,804,438 $120,691,443
================== ================== ================== ==================
</TABLE>
A portion of the amounts indicated as off-balance sheet risk is due to
offsetting commitments to purchase and to sell the same derivative
instrument on the same date in the future. These commitments are
economically offsetting but are not, as a technical matter, offset in the
forward market until the settlement date.
Credit Risk
-----------
The risks associated with exchange-traded contracts are typically
perceived to be less than those associated with over-the-counter (non-
exchange traded) transactions, because exchanges typically (but not
universally) provide clearinghouse arrangements in which the collective
credit (in some cases limited in amount, in some cases not) of the members
of the exchange is pledged to support the financial integrity of the
exchange. In over-the-counter transactions, on the other hand, traders
must rely solely on the credit of their respective individual
counterparties. Margins, which may be subject to loss in the
-11-
<PAGE>
event of a default, are generally required in exchange trading, and
counterparties may require margin in the over-the-counter markets.
The fair value amounts in the above tables represent the extent of the
Partnership's market exposure in the particular class of derivative
instrument listed, but not the credit risk associated with counterparty
nonperformance. The credit risk associated with these instruments from
counterparty nonperformance is the net unrealized gain, if any, included
in the Statements of Financial Condition. The Partnership also has credit
risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to most of the
Partnership's assets is MLF.
As of December 31, 1996 and 1995, $19,782,856 and $40,105,401 of the
Partnership's assets, respectively, were held in segregated accounts at
MLF in accordance with Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations.
The gross unrealized profit and net unrealized profit (loss) on the
Partnership's open derivative instrument positions as of December 31, 1996
and 1995 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Gross Unrealized Net Unrealized Gross Unrealized Net Unrealized
Profit Profit (Loss) Profit Profit (Loss)
-------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Exchange Traded $ 80,876 $64,542 $3,033,800 $2,654,820
Non-Exchange Traded 34,397 (4,332) 127,073 (139,634)
---------- ---------- ------------ -------------
$115,273 $60,210 $3,160,873 $2,515,186
========== ========== ============ =============
</TABLE>
The Partnership controls credit risk by dealing almost exclusively with
Merrill Lynch entities as brokers and counterparties.
The Partnership, through its normal course of business, enters into
various contracts with MLF acting as its commodity broker. Pursuant to the
brokerage arrangement with MLF, to the extent that such trading results in
receivables from and payables to MLF, these receivables and payables are
offset and reported as a net receivable or payable.
8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 2, 1997 the Partnership acquired an interest in ML Sjo Prospect
L.L.C. (see Note 6 for a general description of investments).
Effective February 1, 1997, the Partnership's brokerage commission
percentage was reduced to .729 of 1% (an 8.75% annual rate) of the
Partnership's month-end assets allocated to trading.
-12-
<PAGE>
To the best of the knowledge and belief of the
undersigned, the information contained in this
report is accurate and complete.
James M. Bernard
Chief Financial Officer
Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.
General Partner of
The SECTOR Strategy Fund/SM/ VI L.P.
-13-
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
PARTNERS' CAPITAL AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000904364
<NAME> THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND/SM/ VI L.P.
<S> <C> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996 DEC-31-1995
<CASH> 0 0
<RECEIVABLES> 23,701,369 54,728,444
<SECURITIES-RESALE> 0 0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED> 0 0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED> 8,288,948 0
<PP&E> 0 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 31,990,317 54,728,444
<SHORT-TERM> 0 0
<PAYABLES> 1,043,410 4,297,431
<REPOS-SOLD> 0 0
<SECURITIES-LOANED> 0 0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD> 0 0
<LONG-TERM> 0 0
0 0
0 0
<COMMON> 0 0
<OTHER-SE> 30,946,907 50,431,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 31,990,317 54,728,444
<TRADING-REVENUE> 1,719,871 7,413,479
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS> 1,661,887 4,001,380
<COMMISSIONS> 2,243,462 5,771,415
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES> 0 0
<FEE-REVENUE> 0 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0 0
<COMPENSATION> 0 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,631,046 4,557,279
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY> 1,631,046 4,557,279
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0 0
<CHANGES> 0 0
<NET-INCOME> 1,631,046 4,557,279
<EPS-PRIMARY> 4.49 5.80
<EPS-DILUTED> 4.49 5.80
</TABLE>
