UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 1997
Commission File Number: 1-13600
-------
HUNTCO INC.
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MISSOURI 43-1643751
- ------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
14323 SOUTH OUTER FORTY, SUITE 600N, TOWN & COUNTRY, MISSOURI 63017
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(314) 878-0155
--------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
CLASS A COMMON STOCK,
$0.01 PAR VALUE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
--------------------- -------------------------------------------
(Title of class) (Name of each exchange on which registered)
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
----
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant at June 30, 1997 was $71,359,668 (computed by reference to the
closing price of the registrant's Class A common stock, as quoted by the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. on such date). All of the Company's Class B common
stock, which is the only other voting stock of the Company, is held by
affiliates of the Company.
As of June 30, 1997, the number of shares outstanding of each class of
the Registrant's common stock was as follows: 5,292,000 shares of Class A
common stock and 3,650,000 shares of Class B common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held September 11, 1997 (the "1997 Proxy
Statement"), are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
- -----------------
BACKGROUND
- ----------
Huntco Inc. ("Huntco" or "the Company") was incorporated under Missouri law in
May 1993, to indirectly hold the common stock of Huntco Steel, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Huntco Steel") and Midwest Products, Inc., a Missouri
corporation ("Midwest"). The Company, through Huntco Steel, is a major
intermediate steel processor, specializing in the processing of flat rolled
carbon steel to specified close tolerances. Through Midwest, the Company is a
leading manufacturer of portable compressed air vessels for sale through mass
merchandisers and compressed air cylinders for use in tractor-trailer brake
systems.
The Company's products are delivered from facilities in Arkansas, Illinois,
Kentucky, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas to over
1,300 customers located primarily in the midwestern and southern regions of
the United States. The strategic location of the Company's steel processing
plants, with access to its major suppliers via the inland waterway system,
allows the Company to take delivery of raw materials by barge, in addition to
rail and truck, thereby minimizing inbound transportation costs. The
Company's primary processed products include hot rolled, hot rolled pickled
and oiled, hot rolled tempered and cold rolled steel, which is cut-to-length
into sheets, plates, or custom blanks; slit; edge conditioned; or in the case
of pickled and oiled, tempered and cold rolled products, sold as master coils.
The Company also produces custom metal stampings.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
- -----------------
Intermediate steel processors occupy a niche between the primary steel
producers and industrial customers who need processed steel for their end-
product manufacturing purposes and between the primary producers and general
steel service centers and distributors who handle broad product lines of
processed metal products and who tend to specialize more in distribution than
in processing. Intermediate steel processors specialize in value-added
processing of steel coils, such as cutting-to-length, slitting, blanking,
shape correction and surface improvement, pickling, cold reduction, annealing,
tempering, edge rolling, shearing and stamping. These processes produce steel
to specified lengths, widths, shapes and surface characteristics pursuant to
specific customer orders. The processing techniques typically require
specialized equipment and require high volume production in order to be
performed economically. Intermediate steel processors typically have lower
cost structures and provide better service in value-added processing than the
primary producers. The intermediate steel processors are able to perform many
of these processes more efficiently than steel service centers and
distributors because the intermediate steel processors specialize in a
narrower range of products and therefore are able to attract sufficient volume
to justify the investment in specialized processing equipment.
Primary steel producers historically have emphasized the sale of steel to
large volume purchasers and generally have viewed intermediate steel
processors as an integral part of their customer base. Furthermore, end
product manufacturers and service centers and distributors increasingly have
sought to purchase steel on shorter lead times and with more frequent and
reliable deliveries than normally can be provided by the primary producers.
Additionally, most manufacturers are not willing to commit to the investment
in technology, equipment and inventory required to process steel for use in
their own manufacturing operations. These industry forces have created a
market in which the success of an intermediate steel processor is based upon
its ability to purchase, process and deliver steel to the end user in a more
efficient and cost effective manner than the end user could achieve in dealing
directly with the primary producer of the steel or with another intermediate
steel processor.
<PAGE>
PRODUCTS AND PROCESSING SERVICES
- --------------------------------
The Company maintains a substantial inventory of steel coils purchased from
the primary producers. This steel is in the form of a continuous sheet,
typically 36 to 84 inches wide, between .015 and .500 inches thick, and rolled
into 10 to 30-ton coils. Because of the size and weight of these coils and
the equipment required to move and process them into smaller sizes, such coils
do not meet the requirements, without further processing, of a majority of the
Company's customers. By purchasing various kinds of steel in large quantities
and at predetermined intervals, the Company attempts to purchase its raw
materials at the lowest competitive price for the quality purchased.
Customer orders are entered in a computerized order entry system, and
appropriate inventory is then selected and scheduled for processing in
accordance with the customer's specified delivery date. The Company attempts
to maximize yield by combining customer orders for processing to use each
purchased coil to the fullest extent practicable.
The Company uses techniques such as cold rolling, annealing, tempering,
pickling, cutting-to-length, slitting, blanking, edge rolling, shearing and
stamping to process steel to specified lengths, widths and shapes pursuant to
specific customer orders. Cold rolling and tempering reduces the thickness of
the steel by passing the steel through pressure reduction rolls, which also
improves the surface characteristics of the steel being processed. Annealing
involves heating the steel to soften it for further finishing after it has
been cold reduced. Pickling cleans the mill scale from the steel by
subjecting the steel to a series of hydrochloric acid baths. A portion of the
steel that the Company pickles serves as feed stock for the cold rolling mill.
Cutting-to-length involves cutting steel along the width of the coil.
Slitting involves cutting steel to specified widths along the length of the
coil. Blanking cuts the steel into close tolerance, specific shapes. Shape
correction improves the physical appearance of the steel by removing edge
wave, center buckle, crown or camber from the steel by a process known as
elongation, which includes equalizing and tension leveling, and which achieves
shape correction by stretching the fibers of the steel. Edge rolling imparts
round or smooth edges to produce strips or coils. Shearing cuts the steel
into small pieces. Stamping involves using presses to form previously
processed steel (e.g. slit coils) into parts.
The Company also manufactures compressed air cylinders for tractor-trailer air
brake systems and portable compressed air vessels to inflate objects, such as
automobile tires, which are sold to mass merchandisers and automotive
specialty stores. The air cylinders are fabricated from components processed
by a Company processing center, including the stamped heads, legs and handles
and the blanked wraps. The components are welded, painted, tested and
packaged as required.
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
- --------------------
Blytheville Facility:
Located in Blytheville, Arkansas, with access to the Mississippi River, the
Blytheville facility continues to drive the Company's growth. The Company
began operations in Blytheville in October, 1992 with a new, heavy gauge, cut-
to-length line, followed by a new, heavy gauge, slitting line in June, 1993.
A push-pull coil pickling line was next placed into service in June, 1994.
The Company began limited production in its cold rolling operation in the
first quarter of fiscal 1996, which includes a cold rolling mill, annealing
furnaces, and a temper mill for coils up to 60 inches wide (the "Cold Mill").
The initial phase of the Cold Mill had a productive capacity of up to 240,000
tons per year. The Company completed capacity and quality enhancements to the
Cold Mill during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, by adding more annealing
furnaces and installing shape meter rolls to the cold rolling mill, thereby
increasing the capacity of the Cold Mill to produce fully annealed cold rolled
master coils to approximately 360,000 tons per year. The Company is also in
the process of adding a second coil pickling line, with start up scheduled for
the middle of fiscal 1998, which should increase the Company's pickling
capacity to approximately 900,000 tons per year.
During the first half of fiscal 1997, the Company completed the relocation of
its stamping operations from a facility located in Springfield, Missouri to a
new plant located within the Blytheville facility. In conjunction with this
relocation, the new stamping plant has been equipped with new slitting and
blanking equipment designed to process both cold rolled and pickled and oiled
steel.
On January 30, 1997, the Company acquired a hot rolled steel tempering
facility from Coil-Tec, Inc., which was located immediately adjacent to the
Company's existing Blytheville operations. The Coil-Tec facility has been
integrated into the Company's Blytheville facility, and the Company
successfully restarted the temper mill obtained in conjunction with this
acquisition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997.
Chattanooga Facility:
Located in Chattanooga, Tennessee, on the Tennessee River, the Chattanooga
facility opened in July, 1994 with a heavy gauge, cut-to-length line. The
facility was expanded in April, 1995 with the addition of a new slitting line
and in June, 1995 with the addition of a new cut-to-length line, both of which
were designed to process cold rolled and pickled and oiled steel. The
Chattanooga facility provides the Company access to markets in the
southeastern United States, servicing customers such as service centers,
appliance and furniture manufacturers, tube mills, and other end users of both
hot rolled and cold rolled steel.
Berkeley Facility:
Located in Berkeley County, South Carolina, near Charleston, this new facility
is in close proximity to a new Nucor steel mill which produces both hot rolled
and cold rolled steel. The Company opened this facility in late fiscal 1997
with a new, heavy gauge, sheet and plate cut-to-length line and added a new
high-speed, light gauge slitting line as of the end of fiscal 1997. The South
Carolina facility has rail access as well as waterway access to the Atlantic
Ocean. The Company is serving markets along the Atlantic seaboard to the
north and south, as well as to the west, with processed products from this
location.
Gallatin Facility:
Located in Gallatin County, Kentucky, on a 20-acre tract of land immediately
adjacent to the Gallatin steel mill, and with access to the Ohio River, this
new facility was opened by the Company in May, 1996 with a new, heavy gauge,
sheet and plate cut-to-length line. The facility sells processed sheets and
plates to manufacturers servicing the transportation and heavy machinery
industries.
Madison Facility:
Located in the St. Louis metropolitan area with access to the Mississippi
River, the Madison, Illinois facility commenced operations in 1983. The
facility is equipped with two slitting lines. One of the slitting lines is
used to process heavy gauge, hot rolled steel while the other primarily
processes cold rolled and pickled and oiled steel. The facility also operates
a new cut-to-length line to process cold rolled and pickled and oiled steel
which was added in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996. Early in fiscal 1997,
the Company expanded this facility to provide inside rail access to better
facilitate the handling of cold rolled products. The facility provides
processed steel products to a diverse group of customers, including metal
fabricators, service centers and tube, consumer durables and transportation
equipment manufacturers.
Catoosa Facility:
Located at the Port of Catoosa, near Tulsa, Oklahoma, the Catoosa facility is
situated on the western edge of the inland waterway system on the Arkansas
River. This facility commenced operations in 1978 and is equipped with a
heavy gauge, cut-to-length line which was purchased new in 1985. The facility
was expanded during fiscal 1996 to include a doubling of the physical plant
and the addition of a cut-to-length line to process cold rolled and pickled
and oiled steel. The building expansion also allows for inside coil storage.
The facility processes coils into sheets and plates, primarily for heavy
equipment manufacturers, manufacturers of tanks for petroleum products and for
wet and dry bulk storage, construction and metal building companies.
Pasadena Facility:
Located on a 20 acre tract of land on the shipping channel near Houston,
Texas, the Pasadena facility commenced operations in 1982. The facility is
equipped with two heavy gauge cut-to-length lines, the first of which was
purchased new in 1982 and the second of which was added in December, 1994.
The facility operates its own unloading facility and is capable of directly
discharging barges. The facility was recently expanded with the addition of a
new climate controlled warehouse used to store cold rolled steel master coils.
The facility produces processed hot rolled sheets and plates for manufacturers
of heavy farm and construction equipment, storage tanks, metal building
companies, and various energy related concerns and distributes unprocessed
master coils of cold rolled and tempered steel.
Strafford Facility:
Located in Strafford, Missouri, this facility is home for the Company's
cylinder operation which produces approximately 700,000 units annually. These
products include air cylinders used in tractor trailer brake systems and
portable compressed air vessels used to fill inflatable objects such as
automobile tires. The major raw material used in the manufacture of the
cylinders is pickled steel, which has been blanked, slit or stamped by the
Company's stamping operation prior to delivery to the Strafford facility for
final assembly, welding and painting. The Company installed an electrostatic,
powder coating paint system at this facility during fiscal 1996, resulting in
higher product quality and lower costs, as well as opening new markets for the
Company.
QUALITY CONTROL
- ---------------
The procurement of high quality steel from suppliers on a consistent basis is
critical to the Company's business. Historically, about 2% of raw materials
has failed to conform to order specifications, with most of the nonconforming
raw material being diverted to less critical applications. The Company has
instituted quality control measures to attempt to assure that the quality of
purchased raw material will allow the Company to meet the specifications of
its customers and to reduce the costs and inefficiencies of production
interruptions. Physical and chemical analyses are performed on selected raw
materials to verify that their mechanical and dimensional properties,
cleanliness and surface characteristics meet the Company's requirements. The
Company believes that maintenance of high standards for accepting raw
materials ultimately results in reduced return rates from its customers.
Similar analyses are conducted on processed steel on a selected basis before
delivery to the customer. The Company also uses statistical process control
techniques to monitor its slitting process so management can document to
customers that required tolerances have been continuously maintained
throughout processing. The Company also maintains a test laboratory at its
Blytheville facility to provide timely and economical testing and quality
certifications.
SUPPLIERS
- ---------
The Company purchases steel coils for processing at regular intervals from a
number of primary steel producers including Nucor Corporation, AK Steel
Corporation, Gallatin Steel, National Steel Corporation, USX Corporation,
Geneva Steel, Inland Steel Company, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and various
foreign suppliers. The Company orders steel to specified physical qualities
and alloy content. By purchasing in large quantities at consistent
predetermined intervals, the Company attempts to purchase its raw materials at
the lowest competitive prices for the quality purchased. The Company believes
that it is not dependent on any one of its suppliers for raw materials and
that it has good relationships with its suppliers.
MARKETING
- ---------
The Company's products and services are sold primarily by Company sales
personnel supported by executive management of Huntco Steel, and by the
Company's technical support staff. The Company generally produces its
processed steel products to specific customer orders rather than for
inventory. The Company generally does not enter into fixed-price sales
contracts with its steel processing customers with terms longer than three
months. Many of the Company's customers commit to purchase on a quarterly
basis with the customer notifying the Company of specific release dates as
they require the processed products. Customers typically notify the Company
of release dates anywhere from a just-in-time basis up to approximately three
weeks before the release date. The Company is therefore required to carry
sufficient inventory of raw materials to meet the short lead-time and just-in-
time delivery requirements of its customers. Because the Company ships most
steel processing orders on short lead-times, the amount of backlog at any
point is not significant.
CUSTOMERS AND DISTRIBUTION
- --------------------------
Huntco sells its processed steel products to over 1,300 customers in market
areas reaching from the upper midwest, south to the Gulf of Mexico and from
the southeastern coastline, west to the Rocky Mountains. The Company's
customer base includes service centers and metal fabricators as well as
various storage tank, consumer durable, energy and transportation related
manufacturers. Other than one customer which accounted for 7.0% of the
Company's net sales, no other customer accounted for more than 5% of the
Company's net sales for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1997. Steel service
centers and distributors, which represent the Company's largest single
customer group, accounted for approximately one-third of the Company's net
sales for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1997. The large geographic area the
Company services helps to minimize the adverse impact of regional economic
changes.
While the Company ships products throughout the United States, its customers
are primarily located in the midwestern and southern regions of the United
States. Most of its steel processing customers are located within a 250-mile
radius of each of the Company's steel processing plants, facilitating an
efficient delivery system capable of handling a high frequency of short lead-
time orders. The Company transports a major portion of its products directly
to customers via independent trucking firms, supplemented by rail and barge.
The Company believes that its long-term relationships with many of its
customers are a significant factor in its business and that pricing and
service capabilities are the most critical factors in maintaining these
relationships.
COMPETITION
- -----------
Intermediate steel processing is a highly competitive industry in which
companies compete based on price, service and their ability to process and
deliver steel products based on short lead-time customer orders. The Company
competes primarily with other intermediate steel processors. Geographic
proximity to a customer is a significant factor. Specific, reliable data
concerning the size of the market in products which the Company processes, by
region, generally is not available. However, based on the Company's knowledge
of the market for processed steel, the amount of processed steel which it
sells to its customers, and a general knowledge of its competitors, the
Company believes that it is a significant competitor in all of the market
areas it serves and that it is one of the larger companies specializing in the
processing of flat rolled carbon steel. The Company's largest competitors
currently include Cargill, Inc., Ferralloy Corp. and Heidtman Steel Products
Inc. The primary competitors of the Company's Cold Mill are various foreign
suppliers, USX Corporation, Gulf States Steel and Nucor.
SEASONALITY
- -----------
Shipping volumes are lowest during the November and December holiday periods
and also tend to be lower during mid-summer, as many of the Company's
customers schedule plant shutdowns for vacations. These factors tend to
result in lower net sales and net income in the third quarter and less
significantly in the first quarter. Quarterly results can also be affected,
either negatively or positively, by changing steel prices.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
- -----------------------
The Company's processing centers and manufacturing facilities are subject to
many federal, state and local requirements relating to the protection of the
environment. The Company continually examines ways to reduce emissions and
waste and to effect cost savings relating to environmental compliance.
Management believes that it is in material compliance with all laws, does not
anticipate any material expenditures in order to meet environmental
requirements and generally believes that its processes and products do not
present any unusual environmental concerns. The Company's expenditures
incurred in connection with compliance with federal, state and local
environmental laws have not had during the past fiscal year, and are not
expected to have during the current fiscal year, a material adverse effect
upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries.
The Company's operations are also governed by laws and regulations relating to
workplace safety and worker health, principally the Occupational Safety and
Health Act and regulations thereunder which, among other requirements,
establish noise and dust standards. Management believes that it is in
material compliance with these laws and regulations and does not believe that
future compliance with such laws and regulations will have a material adverse
effect on its results of operations or financial condition.
EMPLOYEES
- ---------
As of April 30, 1997, the Company employed 688 people. None of the Company's
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Company has
never experienced a significant work stoppage and considers its employee
relations to be good.
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
- -------------------
Reference should be made to the "REVIEW OF OPERATIONS" information found
within ITEM 1 for a further discussion of the Company's operating plant
facilities. The following sets forth certain additional information with
respect to each of these facilities:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Square
Utilization Footage Owned or leased
- ------------------------------ ------- -------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Blytheville, Arkansas:
---------------------
Cutting-to-length 80,000 Lease with a $100 purchase option.
Slitting
Tension leveling, shape
correction or elongation
Gauge verification and testing
Coil storage
Edge conditioning
Pickling 30,000 Owned improvements on leased realty.
Coil warehouse and storage 32,000 Owned improvements on leased realty.
Second pickling line
(under construction) 96,000 Leased equipment, with fair value
purchase option, other owned
improvements on leased realty
Cold rolling, annealing 194,000 Lease with $100 purchase option.
and tempering Certain annealing furnaces leased,
with certain fair value purchase
options.
Cutting-to-length 152,000 Lease with $100 purchase option.
Slitting
Blanking
Tension leveling
Shearing and stamping
Gauge verification and testing
Design and tool engineering
Heavy gauge tempering 130,000 Leased facility and equipment, with
Gauge verification and testing certain fair value purchase options.
Cutting-to-length Selected owned improvements.
Chattanooga, Tennessee:
----------------------
Cutting-to-length 126,000 Lease with $10 purchase option.
Slitting
Tension leveling
Gauge verification and testing
Berkeley County, South Carolina:
-------------------------------
Cutting-to-length 130,000 Purchase commitment for real estate;
Slitting leased processing equipment with
Tension leveling certain fair value purchase options.
Coil storage
Gauge verification and testing
Gallatin County, Kentucky:
-------------------------
Cutting-to-length 65,000 Owned.
Tension leveling
Coil storage
Gauge verification and testing
Madison, Illinois:
------------------
Cutting-to-length 128,000 Owned.
Slitting
Tension leveling
Edge conditioning
Coil storage
Gauge verification and testing
Catoosa, Oklahoma:
-----------------
Cutting-to-length 80,000 Owned improvements on leased realty.
Tension leveling
Coil storage
Gauge verification and testing
Pasadena, Texas:
---------------
Cutting-to-length 45,000 Owned.
Gauge verification and testing
Coil storage 21,000 Owned.
Strafford, Missouri:
-------------------
Gauge verification and testing 100,000 Owned.
Welding
Painting
</TABLE>
The above facilities are well maintained and in good operating condition.
With respect to capacity and utilization of such facilities, most of the
Company's steel processing plants operate an average of approximately 2 shifts
per day on a five day per week basis. The compressed air cylinder
manufacturing facility in Strafford, Missouri operates approximately 1.5
shifts per day.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
- --------------------------
From time to time, the Company is named as a defendant in legal actions
arising out of the normal course of business. The Company is not currently a
party to any pending legal proceedings other than routine litigation
incidental to the business. Management believes the resolution of such
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations or financial condition. The Company maintains liability insurance
against risks arising out of the normal course of business.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
- ------------------------------------------------------------
No matters were submitted to the security holders of the Company during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1997.
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class A common stock of the Company is traded on the New York Stock Exchange,
under the symbol "HCO". As of April 30, 1997, there were 80 holders of record
of the Company's Class A common stock and two holders of record of the
Company's Class B common stock.
All of the Company's 3,650,000 Class B Shares, the only other class of common
equity authorized for issuance under the Company's Restated Articles of
Incorporation (the "Articles"), are held by Huntco Acquisitions Holding, Inc.
and Huntco Farms, Inc., corporations controlled by Mr. B. D. Hunter, the
Company's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
There is no established public trading market for the Class B Shares as the
Articles provide that the Class B Shares are not transferrable except: (i)
upon conversion into Class A Shares as provided in the Articles; (ii) to the
Company for cancellation; or (iii) to any "Hunter Affiliate" or any member of
the "Hunter Group" as those terms are defined in the Articles.
The table below shows the Company's quarterly high and low Class A common
stock prices and quarterly per share dividend amounts paid on the Class A
common stock and the Class B common stock for the fiscal years ended April 30,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------------ --------------
High Low Dividends High Low Dividends
------ ------ --------- ------ ----- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First quarter 19.375 15.125 .030 19.750 14.250 .025
Second quarter 20.125 15.375 .035 18.375 12.375 .030
Third quarter 18.500 13.500 .035 17.625 12.500 .030
Fourth quarter 14.000 10.000 .035 21.750 15.375 .030
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
- --------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCOME STATEMENT DATA (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year Ended April 30, 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $326,563 $264,087 $197,195 $146,213 $116,236
Cost of sales 294,455 245,863(1) 171,521 126,412 101,950
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit 32,108 18,224 25,674 19,801 14,286
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses 15,383 13,147 9,638 8,183 7,076
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income from operations 16,725 5,077 16,036 11,618 7,210
Interest, net (6,239) (3,268) 5 (183) (2,523)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income before
income taxes and
extraordinary items 10,486 1,809 16,041 11,435 4,687
Provision for
income taxes 3,997 701 6,037 4,305 1,942
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income before
extraordinary items 6,489 1,108 10,004 7,130 2,745
Extraordinary items,
net of tax - - - - (683)(2)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income 6,489 1,108 10,004 7,130 2,062
Preferred dividends 50 - - - -
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income available for
common shareholders $6,439 $ 1,108 $ 10,004 $ 7,130 $ 2,062
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Earnings per common share:
Income before
extraordinary items $0.72 $0.12 $1.11 $0.92 $0.61
Net income $0.72 $0.12 $1.11 $0.92 $0.46
Weighted average common
shares outstanding 8,942 8,948 9,048 7,756 4,500
Common cash dividends
per share $0.14 $0.12 $0.10 $0.06 -
(1) Includes an $8,000 lower of cost or market inventory adjustment recorded
in the second quarter of fiscal 1996. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(2) Relates to expensing of prepayment premiums and unamortized loan costs
upon early retirement of certain indebtedness.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE SHEET DATA (in thousands):
April 30, 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Working capital $ 79,502 $ 62,305 $ 84,046 $ 58,220 $ 23,796
Total assets 307,318 222,437 209,898 114,380 67,034
Short-term debt 189 189 371 357 2,782
Long-term debt
(net of current
portion) 100,877 73,066 68,505 1,631 31,438
Preferred stock 4,500 - - - 5,470
Common shareholders'
equity 116,561 111,366 111,252 102,097 11,530
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERVIEW:
Over the past three years, the Company invested $116.5 million in new
property, plant and equipment. As of April 30, 1997, the vast majority of the
property acquired and/or constructed by the Company has been placed into
service. As a result of these investments, and benefiting from a generally
strong economy, the Company was able to increase the volume of steel which it
processed to 941,545 tons for fiscal 1997, an increase of 151.6% as compared
to fiscal 1994, the year of the Company's initial public offering.
These investments, as well as those planned for the year ending April 30,
1998, reflect the Company's continuing efforts to expand its productive
capacity, to broaden the range of its processed products and to access new
geographic territories and new customers. By entering into higher value-added
processing techniques such as pickling, cold rolling, annealing and tempering,
and opening new facilities and expanding existing ones, the Company believes
that it has enhanced its future potential to generate increased levels of net
sales and net income.
FISCAL 1998 FORECAST:
The Company anticipates that its net sales in fiscal 1998 could increase by
approximately 20% over fiscal 1997 levels. The planned increase in net sales
is expected to reflect higher levels of tons sold which are expected to
increase to approximately 1,100,000 tons, with increased cold rolled and
tempered sales from the Blytheville facility and shipments from the new South
Carolina facility being the major contributors to this estimated growth in
sales volume. Because the expanded cold rolling and tempering capacity at the
Blytheville facility and the new South Carolina facility are expected to
produce and sell at increasingly higher levels of volume during the year, the
Company believes that it will ship approximately 10% more tonnage in the
second half of fiscal 1998 than in the first half of fiscal 1998, with the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1998 being the strongest in terms of tons expected to
be shipped. Net sales are expected to increase by a higher percentage than
tons sold because of higher average unit selling prices for cold rolled and
tempered steel, when compared to the average unit selling values for the
Company's traditional hot rolled steel sales, and due to a lower tolling
percentage which is expected to decline over the course of the full fiscal
year to approximately 20% of total tons sold for fiscal 1998.
The Company projects that it will spend approximately $9.0 million on capital
expenditures, primarily during the first half of fiscal 1998, as it completes
the second coil pickling line at its Blytheville facility, which represents
the last of the projects previously announced by the Company in the current
phase of its internal expansion program.
RISK FACTORS - 1998 FORECAST:
This Annual Report contains certain statements that are forward-looking and
involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as "expects," "anticipates,"
"projects," "estimates," "plans," "believes," and variations of such words and
similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
These statements are based on current expectations and projections concerning
the Company's plans for fiscal 1998 and about the steel processing industry in
general, as well as assumptions made by Company management and are not
guarantees of future performance. Therefore, actual events, outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such
forward-looking statements. Achievement of these forward-looking results is
dependent upon numerous factors, circumstances and contingencies, certain of
which are beyond the control of the Company. Certain of the more important
factors which the Company believes could cause actual results to differ
materially from the forward-looking data presented include:
Impact of changing steel prices on the Company's results of operations:
As evidenced by the unfavorable impact on net income in fiscal years 1996 and
1997, the Company's financial results can be significantly impacted by
changing steel prices. The Company's principal raw material is flat rolled
carbon steel coils. The steel industry is highly cyclical in nature and
prices for the Company's raw materials are influenced by numerous factors
beyond the control of the Company, including general economic conditions,
competition, labor costs, import duties and other trade restrictions and
currency exchange rates. Changing steel prices may cause the Company's
results of operations to fluctuate significantly.
To respond promptly to customer orders for its products, the Company maintains
a substantial inventory of steel coils in stock and on order. The Company's
commitments for steel purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in
effect at the time the Company places its orders. The Company has no
long-term, fixed-price steel purchase contracts. The Company generally does
not enter into fixed-price sales contracts with its steel processing customers
with terms longer than three months.
As steel producers change the effective selling price for the Company's raw
materials, competitive conditions may influence the amount of the change, if
any, in the Company's selling prices to its customers. Changing steel prices
could therefore affect the Company's net sales and net income, particularly as
it liquidates its inventory position. The Company believes that a major
portion of the effect of a steel price change on net income is likely to be
experienced within three months of the effective date of the change. When a
series of changes in steel prices occurs, the period in which net income may
be affected can extend beyond a three month period of time. Accordingly, the
Company believes that comparisons of its quarterly results of operations are
not necessarily meaningful in periods of changing steel prices.
Steel prices charged by the primary producers of hot rolled steel coils, both
domestic and foreign, have been extremely volatile over the previous two
years, and conditions exist which could cause this volatility to continue
throughout the Company's 1998 fiscal year. No assurance can be given that
volatility in steel prices will not again negatively impact the Company's
results of operations and net income.
Cyclicality of demand for Company products:
Many of the Company's steel processing products are sold to industries that
experience significant fluctuations in demand based on economic conditions,
energy prices or other matters beyond the control of the Company. The Company
has increased the level of tons of steel sold and processed in each of its
last five fiscal years. However, no assurance can be given that the Company
will be able to increase or maintain its level of tons shipped, especially in
periods of economic stagnation or downturn. The expected increase in tons
processed and shipped assumes that the Company is able to maintain the base
volume of tons processed and shipped in the 1997 fiscal year. This assumption
is based upon the Company's experience, the most relevant experience being
over the previous five years, and an assumption that economic conditions in
the Company's primary market areas will reflect a stable, slow-growth
environment. There can be no assurance, however, that economic conditions
will continue to reflect a stable, slow-growth environment or that other
circumstances will not occur leading to an economic stagnation or downturn.
Continued internal expansion involving new processes and markets:
Notwithstanding the fact that the growth in the Company's net sales over the
previous five fiscal years has resulted from increasing levels of tons
processed and sold, with such increases in tonnage primarily occurring at
newly constructed facilities, there can be no assurance that the Company will
be successful in the start-up of its new facility in South Carolina, or in the
continued development and expansion of its cold rolling and hot roll tempering
operations at its Blytheville, Arkansas facility, or that these expansions
will proceed as quickly as the Company anticipates. Successful development of
these projects requires the Company to develop new customers, in new market
territories and absolute assurance cannot be given that this will occur on the
timetable which the Company expects, if ever.
In addition, the market areas covered by the new South Carolina facility, the
continued ramp up of the new stamping plant in Blytheville, and the continued
maturation of the Company's cold rolling and tempering operations will cause
the Company to face new competition.
Competition:
The principal markets served by the Company are highly competitive. The
Company has different competitors within each of its product lines.
Competition is based principally on price, service, production and delivery
scheduling.
Interest rates:
Borrowings under the Company's revolving credit agreement are at interest
rates which float generally with the prime rate or with LIBOR. The level of
interest expense incurred by the Company under the revolving credit agreement
will therefore fluctuate in line with changes in these rates of interest and
based upon outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit agreement.
Income taxes:
The Company has estimated its effective federal income tax rate based upon
statutory rates in effect in the United States at the beginning of the 1998
fiscal year. State income taxes are estimated based upon the statutory rates
in effect in the states in which the Company conducts its operations and earns
taxable income.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
FISCAL 1997 EXPANSION OF OPERATIONS:
During the quarter ended July 31, 1996, the Company commenced operations at
its new Kentucky facility, with the start-up of a new, heavy gauge, sheet and
plate cut-to-length line. Also during the first quarter of fiscal 1997, the
Company completed the relocation of its metal stamping operation from
Springfield, Missouri to a new plant at the Blytheville facility, in which it
also installed and began operating slitting and blanking lines which are being
used to process cold rolled and light gauge pickled and oiled steel, both for
stamping applications and direct commercial sales.
On January 30, 1997, the Company purchased inventory and certain other
operating assets from Coil-Tec, Inc. On this same date, the Company leased
from an affiliate of Coil-Tec, Inc. and a commercial leasing company,
respectively, a plant facility and a two-high temper mill used in the
production of tempered, hot rolled steel products. The Company has
successfully restarted this hot rolled steel tempering facility, which is now
being operated as a part of the Company's Blytheville facility.
The Company commenced operations at its new South Carolina facility during
late January, 1997, when it began operating a new, heavy gauge, cut-to-length
line, and also installed a slitting line at this facility during April, 1997.
The Company completed the capacity and quality enhancements to its cold
rolling mill at its Blytheville facility during the fourth quarter of fiscal
1997, and enters fiscal 1998 with capacity for fully annealed cold rolled
products of approximately 360,000 tons per year.
The Company is in the early stages of construction related to the installation
of a second coil pickling line in Blytheville. This second pickling line is
expected to become operational sometime during the middle of fiscal 1998.
FISCAL YEAR 1997 ("1997") COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 1996 ("1996"):
Net sales for 1997 were $326.6 million, an increase of 23.7% over the prior
year's net sales of $264.1 million. The improvement in net sales is primarily
attributable to increased levels of tons processed. The Company processed a
record 941,545 tons of steel in 1997, an increase of 22.0% in comparison to
1996. A substantial portion of this tonnage increase related to the sale of
cold rolled products, which sales volume increased 98.4% over the prior year
to 181,313 cold rolled tons for 1997.
Approximately 22.2% of the tons processed during 1997 represented customer-
owned material processed on a per ton, fee basis. For 1996, approximately
23.9% of the tons processed by the Company represented customer-owned
material. Processing customer-owned material generally results in lower
revenues per ton, but higher gross profit expressed as a percentage of net
sales, in comparison to when the Company processes and sells its own steel
inventory.
Reflecting low cost imported material available in the Company's markets
during 1997 and relatively high domestic prices for hot rolled steel at the
beginning of 1996, average per ton selling values declined approximately 0.7%
for the year ended April 30, 1997, as compared to the prior year.
The Company's gross profit margins came under pressure late in the second
quarter of 1997, and this margin pressure extended through the balance of the
fiscal year. The narrowing of gross profit margins during the second half of
1997 was primarily due to higher domestic prices incurred by the Company for
its primary raw material, hot rolled steel coils, as significant quantities of
lower priced imported material became available in its market territories.
Gross profit margins were also negatively impacted during 1997 due to costs
stemming from the start-up of the Company's new plants, primarily the
relocated Blytheville stamping operation and the new facilities in Gallatin
County, Kentucky and Berkeley County, South Carolina. In addition, shipments
declined during the Company's third quarter of 1997 as Coil-Tec, Inc.
liquidated a substantial amount of hot-rolled steel inventory in the Company's
market territories prior to the sale of certain of its operating assets to the
Company on January 30, 1997. This third quarter volume decline served to
reduce the absorption of fixed manufacturing costs during the third quarter of
1997, contributing to lower gross profit margins realized by the Company.
Despite these gross margin pressures, gross profit expressed as a percentage
of net sales increased to 9.8% for 1997, versus 6.9% for 1996. However, the
improvement in the Company's gross profit percentage was attributable to a
very low gross profit percentage in 1996 caused primarily by declining steel
prices and start-up expenses related to the Company's cold rolling mill. For
a further discussion of the prior year impact of declining steel prices and
the related lower of cost or market inventory adjustment, see Note 2 to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the discussion
included in the comparison of the results of operations between fiscal 1996
and fiscal 1995 which follows.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses of $15.4 million for
1997 reflects an increase of $2.2 million over the prior year. However, SG&A
expenses declined as a percentage of net sales from 5.0% during 1996 to 4.7%
of net sales during 1997. The increase in SG&A expenses is attributable to
the higher level of business activity conducted throughout the Company, and
the new facilities in Kentucky and South Carolina.
Income from operations was $16.7 million in 1997, an increase of $11.6 million
over 1996's income from operations of $5.1 million. This increase reflects
the factors discussed in the preceding paragraphs.
Net interest expense of $6.2 million was incurred during 1997, an increase of
$2.9 million over the prior year. This increase was the result of higher 1997
borrowings on the Company's revolving credit facility in order to support
higher working capital levels, as well as lower capitalized interest during
1997 versus 1996, as many of the Company's capital projects have been placed
into service. As a result, the Company capitalized $1.2 million of interest
costs to construction in progress in 1997, versus $2.1 million for 1996.
The effective income tax rate experienced by the Company was 38.1% during
1997, which compares to a rate of 38.8% during the prior year. The decrease
in the effective rate reflects the impact of non-deductible expenses, such as
goodwill amortization, which have a lesser percentage impact upon the
Company's effective income tax rate at higher levels of taxable income.
Net income available for common shareholders for 1997 was $6.4 million, or
$.72 per share, which amounts increased over net income available for common
shareholders for 1996 of $1.1 million, or $.12 per share. These increases
reflect the factors discussed in the preceding paragraphs.
FISCAL YEAR 1996 ("1996") COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 1995 ("1995"):
Net sales for the year ended April 30, 1996 were $264.1 million, an increase
of 34.0% in comparison to the $197.2 million of net sales for 1995.
The improvement in net sales was attributable to increased levels of tons
sold. For the year ended April 30, 1996, the Company sold 771,937 tons of
steel, an increase of 36.2% over the prior year. Included in the 1996 tons
sold figures were 91,373 tons of cold rolled steel products produced at the
Company's new cold rolling operation in Blytheville, Arkansas. Net sales of
cold rolled products totaled approximately $40.5 million for the year ended
April 30, 1996.
Approximately 23.9% and 26.2% of the tons sold in the years ended April 30,
1996 and 1995, respectively, represented customer-owned material processed and
sold on a per ton, fee basis.
Average per ton selling values for the Company's traditional hot rolled and
pickled and oiled products declined 3.7% in comparison to the previous fiscal
year. These selling price declines were primarily reflective of the lower
base price of hot rolled steel available from the primary domestic producers,
as discussed further below.
Starting late in 1995, and continuing through the second quarter of 1996, the
primary domestic steel producers introduced multiple reductions in the price
of hot rolled steel, which is the primary raw material used in the Company's
steel processing business. These raw material price reductions accelerated
during the second quarter of 1996, as the base price charged by the Company's
suppliers of hot rolled steel declined from $350.00 per ton as of August 1,
1995, to as low as $280.00 per ton during September 1995. As a result of
these price reductions, the Company recorded a lower of cost or market
inventory adjustment in the second quarter of 1996, which reduced the carrying
value of its on hand inventories by approximately $8.0 million (before related
income tax benefits) as of October 31, 1995.
The decreases in the base price of hot rolled steel initiated or accelerated
inventory stock reductions by steel processors, including the Company, as well
as by many of the Company's customers. In response to this changed market
situation, the Company at first delayed planned increases in its selling
prices, but as the first quarter of 1996 progressed, began lowering its
selling prices in advance of receiving lower cost raw materials.
The downward pressure on raw material hot rolled steel pricing during 1995
began at a time when the average cost of steel in the Company's inventory was
increasing. The Company had previously sold most of the lower cost foreign
material purchased during 1995, and was beginning to sell steel purchased from
domestic suppliers, which was purchased at prices in effect before the series
of sheet price reductions were implemented. Also, due to (1) unpredictable
lead times for receipt of the imported material purchased by the Company
during 1995, (2) delay in the start-up of the Company's new cold rolling mill
and (3) steel purchased in advance of further announced price increases, the
Company's on hand inventory position was at higher than normal levels when
this series of price reductions was initiated by the primary domestic steel
producers.
In addition to the negative effects on the Company's net sales and gross
profit caused by the declining price of steel discussed above, lower
absorption of manufacturing costs associated with the start-up and ramp-up of
the Company's new cold rolling operation served to keep the Company's gross
profit under pressure during 1996.
As a result of the factors discussed in the preceding paragraphs, gross profit
as a percentage of net sales decreased from 13.0% in 1995 to 6.9% for 1996.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased $3.5 million
from 1995 to 1996, due to the increased sales activity of the Company and its
continued operational expansion. However, SG&A expenses remained relatively
constant as a percentage of net sales, showing only a negligible increase over
the prior year (i.e., 5.0% for 1996 versus 4.9% for 1995).
Income from operations declined to $5.1 million for 1996, from $16.0 million
for 1995. This decrease reflects the factors discussed in the preceding
paragraphs.
Net interest expense of $3.3 million was incurred during 1996, versus a
negligible amount of net interest income for 1995. The increase in interest
expense arose from borrowings to fund the Company's capital expansion program.
In addition, the Company capitalized $2.1 million and $1.8 million of interest
costs to construction in progress during 1996 and 1995, respectively.
The effective income tax rate experienced by the Company was 38.8% for 1996
versus 37.6% for 1995. The difference between the effective tax rate and the
federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily the result of state income taxes
and the non-deductible amortization of goodwill and other costs, the effect of
which is greater when the Company experiences lesser amounts of income before
income taxes.
The Company reported net income for 1996 of $1.1 million, or $.12 per share,
which compares to net income of $10.0 million, or $1.11 per share in the prior
year. This decrease reflects the factors discussed in the preceding
paragraphs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:
The Company invested $28.1 million, $34.2 million, and $54.3 million of cash
during 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively, in new property, plant and
equipment, as expenditures were made in conjunction with the Company's capital
expansion projects -- most significantly the new Kentucky facility, the new
stamping plant at the Blytheville facility, the new South Carolina facility
and the acquisition of certain equipment from Coil-Tec, Inc. during 1997, and
the new Blytheville cold rolling operation during 1996 and 1995. Cash
remaining from the Company's November 1993 public stock offering provided the
funds to allow the Company to continue its capital expansion program into
1995. The Company was able to sustain its capital expansion efforts during
1995, and into 1996 and 1997, by way of increased corporate borrowings of
$66.9 million during 1995, and primarily from cash provided by operations
during 1996. Increased borrowings on the Company's revolving credit facility,
as well as the issuance of $4.5 million of Series A preferred stock on January
30, 1997, provided the funds for these expenditures during 1997.
During 1997 and 1995, net cash used by operations was $4.5 million and $22.6
million, respectively. Inventories registered significant increases in both
of these years (a) in support of the substantial growth in sales volumes
experienced by the Company, (b) in order to stage material for throughput on
the Company's new processing lines, and (c) as of April 30, 1995 as a
defensive measure by the Company in light of rising steel prices throughout
much of 1995 and 1994. However, fiscal 1996 saw a large reduction in the
Company's investment in raw materials as the Company sought to reduce its
exposure to raw material price changes by maintaining a relatively lower
balance of domestically supplied steel coil inventory. At the same time, the
Company continued to increase its investment in accounts receivable consistent
with the Company's sales growth. As a result, net cash provided by operations
in 1996 was $29.9 million.
As of April 30, 1997, the Company had significantly increased its investment
in its raw material steel coil inventory, in order to take advantage of
favorable import pricing in relation to prices offered by the domestic
producers of hot rolled steel coils. As a result of the relative shift in the
supplier base of the Company's raw materials to a significant amount of
imported material, which must be ordered with longer lead times for delivery
when compared to the Company's traditional domestic supplier base, a resulting
increase occurred in the Company's investment in inventory. In order to
assist in the funding of this increased investment in inventory during 1997,
the Company borrowed additional funds on its revolving credit facility and
significantly increased its trade accounts payable balance as of its 1997 year
end, electing to forego quick pay discounts on much of its inventory purchases
occurring late in 1997.
With respect to cash flows from financing activities, the Company refinanced
$50.0 million in long-term debt during 1996. On July 14, 1995, the Company
issued $50.0 million of ten-year term notes (the "1995 Notes") to a group of
domestic commercial lenders. The 1995 Notes bear interest at the fixed rate
of 8.13% per annum and mature in equal annual installments of $7.1 million on
each July 15, 1999-2005. The proceeds from the issuance of the 1995 Notes
were used to reduce the Company's outstanding borrowings on its line of credit
facility with a group of domestic commercial banks. As of April 30, 1997, the
Company had unused borrowing capacity of $28.9 million under its revolving
credit facility, which total facility was increased from $60.0 million to
$80.0 million effective December 17, 1996. However, the amount of unused
borrowing capacity was effectively limited to $20.0 million as of April 30,
1997, as discussed in the following paragraph.
The Company established a policy to limit its long-term debt, inclusive of
current maturities (i.e., "funded debt"), to no more than 50% of total
capitalization (i.e., the sum of the Company's funded debt and total
shareholders' equity). The Company formalized this policy in connection with
the issuance of the 1995 Notes, agreeing with the purchasers of the 1995 Notes
to a covenant limiting the Company's funded debt to no more than 50% of total
capitalization. As of April 30, 1997, the ratio of funded debt to total
capitalization was 45.5%. As such, the Company had unused borrowing capacity
of approximately $20.0 million as of April 30, 1997, in accordance with this
debt covenant.
During 1997, the Company entered into operating leases with domestic
commercial lenders for (a) a new cut-to-length line and a new slitting line
for its South Carolina facility, (b) the additional annealing furnaces
acquired for the expansion of its cold rolling facility, (c) a two-high temper
mill for processing hot rolled steel coils, and (d) the second coil pickling
line for the Blytheville facility. The Company also entered into an operating
lease with an affiliate of Coil-Tec, Inc. on January 30, 1997, in order to
obtain use of Coil-Tec's former plant facility in Blytheville. Annual
operating lease payments are expected to range between $3.5 million and $3.8
million over the next five years.
On January 30, 1997, the Company issued 225,000 shares of Series A preferred
stock (the "Series A Preferred"). Shares of Series A Preferred are cumulative
and non-voting, and accrue dividends at the annual rate of $.888889 per share,
with such dividends being payable quarterly. Shares of Series A Preferred
carry a liquidation preference of $20.00 per share, and are convertible on a
one-for-one basis into shares of the Company's Class A common stock (a) at any
time at the option of the holder, and (b) at the option of the Company under
certain circumstances, including if at any time the applicable holding period
under Rule 144(k) of Regulation C promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933
has been satisfied and the closing price of the Company's Class A common
stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, is at least $25.00 per
share for thirty consecutive trading days. Under the Company's Restated
Articles of Incorporation, authorized but unissued preferred stock is issuable
in series under such terms and conditions as the Company's Board of Directors
may determine. However, no further shares of Series A Preferred may be issued
by the Company. The Company issued all 225,000 shares of Series A Preferred
to Coil-Tec, Inc. in connection with the Company's acquisition of $4.5 million
of depreciable assets and certain other operating assets of Coil-Tec, Inc. on
January 30, 1997.
The Company paid dividends on its Class A common stock and its Class B common
stock of $1.2 million, $1.0 million, and $.8 million during the years ended
April 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
No other significant capital projects are currently planned and committed to
by the Company beyond completion of the second pickling line at the
Blytheville facility during fiscal 1998. The Company expects to fund the
approximate $9.0 million of anticipated 1998 capital expenditures with net
cash to be provided by operations and through additional borrowings.
The Company's cash position, unused borrowing capacity, and cash anticipated
to be generated from operations is expected to be sufficient to meet its
commitments in terms of working capital growth, capital expenditures and the
payment of dividends on the outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock and
Class A and Class B common stock during 1998.
The Company maintains the flexibility to issue additional equity in the form
of Class A common stock or additional series of preferred stock if and when
market circumstances dictate. The Company, from time-to-time, explores
financing alternatives such as increasing its borrowing capacity on its
revolving credit facility, the possibility of issuing additional long-term
debt, or pursuing further operating lease financing for new business
expansions.
QUARTERLY EFFECTS AND SEASONALITY:
Shipping volumes are lowest during the November and December holiday periods
and also tend to be lower during mid-summer, as many of the Company's
customers schedule plant shutdowns for vacations. These factors tend to
result in lower net sales and net income in the third quarter and less
significantly in the first quarter. Quarterly results can also be affected,
either negatively or positively, by changing steel prices, as described
previously herein.
INFLATION:
The Company's operations have not been, nor are they expected to be,
materially affected by inflation. However, the Company is affected by changes
in the price of steel charged by the primary producers, which are not
considered to be inflation-sensitive, but rather sensitive to changes in steel
demand as the primary producers use pricing policy to attempt to control their
order levels and backlog.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
In March 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" (FAS 128), which
requires public entities to present both basic and diluted earnings per share
amounts on the face of their financial statements, replacing the former
calculations of primary and fully diluted earnings per share. The Company
will adopt FAS 128 effective with its fiscal 1998 third quarter, and
anticipates that, when adopted, FAS 128 will not have a material effect on its
reported earnings per common share.
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
- ----------------------------------------------------
HUNTCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
April 30,
1997 1996
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 1,124 $ 2,737
Accounts receivable, net 46,452 36,804
Inventories 105,569 53,964
Other current assets 3,983 1,926
------- -------
157,128 95,431
Property, plant and equipment, net 141,436 120,338
Other assets 8,754 6,668
------- -------
$307,318 $222,437
======= =======
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 72,569 $ 29,003
Accrued expenses 4,868 3,934
Current maturities of long-term debt 189 189
------- -------
77,626 33,126
------- -------
Long-term debt 100,877 73,066
Deferred income taxes 7,754 4,879
------- -------
108,631 77,945
------- -------
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 8) - -
Shareholders' equity:
Series A preferred stock (issued and outstanding,
225 and none, stated at liquidation value) 4,500 -
Common stock:
Class A (issued and outstanding, 5,292) 53 53
Class B (issued and outstanding, 3,650) 37 37
Additional paid-in-capital 86,530 86,567
Retained earnings 29,941 24,709
------- -------
121,061 111,366
------- -------
$307,318 $222,437
======= =======
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
HUNTCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended April 30,
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $326,563 $264,087 $197,195
Cost of sales 294,455 245,863 171,521
------- ------- -------
Gross profit 32,108 18,224 25,674
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 15,383 13,147 9,638
------- ------- -------
Income from operations 16,725 5,077 16,036
Interest, net (6,239) (3,268) 5
------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes 10,486 1,809 16,041
Provision for income taxes 3,997 701 6,037
------- ------- -------
Net income $ 6,489 $ 1,108 $ 10,004
Preferred dividends 50 - -
------- ------- -------
Net income available for common shareholders $ 6,439 $ 1,108 $ 10,004
======= ======= =======
Earnings per common share $ .72 $ .12 $ 1.11
===== ===== =====
Weighted average
common shares outstanding 8,942 8,948 9,048
===== ===== =====
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
HUNTCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended April 30,
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Series A preferred stock
Balance at beginning of year $ - $ - $ -
January 30, 1997 share issuance 4,500 - -
------ ------ ------
Balance at April 30 $ 4,500 $ - $ -
====== ====== ======
Class A common stock
Balance at beginning of year $ 53 $ 53 $ 53
------ ------ ------
Balance at April 30 $ 53 $ 53 $ 53
====== ====== ======
Class B common stock
Balance at beginning of year $ 37 $ 37 $ 37
------ ------ ------
Balance at April 30 $ 37 $ 37 $ 37
====== ====== ======
Additional paid-in-capital
Balance at beginning of year $86,567 $86,533 $86,533
Other changes (37) 34 -
------ ------ ------
Balance at April 30 $86,530 $86,567 $86,533
====== ====== ======
Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of year $24,709 $24,629 $15,474
Net income 6,489 1,108 10,004
Dividends on:
Common stock (1,207) (1,028) (849)
Series A preferred stock (50) - -
------ ------ ------
Balance at April 30 $29,941 $24,709 $24,629
====== ====== ======
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
HUNTCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended April 30,
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 6,489 $ 1,108 $ 10,004
------- ------- -------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 8,225 6,561 3,589
Other (675) (5) (5)
Decrease (increase) in:
accounts receivable (9,648) (7,662) (9,977)
inventories (51,605) 23,762 (45,085)
other current assets (2,057) (961) 94
other assets (2,632) (910) (653)
Increase in:
accounts payable 43,566 3,485 18,057
accrued expenses 934 2,470 300
non-current deferred taxes 2,875 2,091 1,118
------- ------- -------
Total adjustments (11,017) 28,831 (32,562)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided (used) by operations (4,528) 29,939 (22,558)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property,
plant and equipment, net (28,102) (34,153) (54,252)
------- ------- -------
Net cash used by investing activities (28,102) (34,153) (54,252)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of Series A preferred stock 4,500 - -
Net proceeds from newly-issued debt 28,000 50,000 67,250
Net payments on long-term debt (189) (45,621) (362)
Common stock dividends (1,207) (1,028) (849)
Other (87) 34 -
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities 31,017 3,385 66,039
------- ------- -------
Net (decrease) in cash (1,613) (829) (10,771)
Cash, beginning of year 2,737 3,566 14,337
------- ------- -------
Cash, end of year $ 1,124 $ 2,737 $ 3,566
======= ======= =======
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
HUNTCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
-----------------------------------------------------------
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The policies utilized by the Company in the preparation of the financial
statements conform to generally accepted accounting principles, and require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from these estimates. The significant accounting
policies followed by the Company are described below:
Organization and operations:
Huntco Inc. ("Huntco" or "the Company") conducts its operations through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries Huntco Steel, Inc. ("Huntco Steel") and Midwest
Products, Inc. ("Midwest"). Huntco Steel operates seven steel processing
centers specializing in the processing and distribution of flat rolled carbon
steel, and sells its processed steel products to a diverse group of industrial
customers, steel service centers and distributors. Midwest is principally
engaged in the manufacture of compressed air cylinders used in the
transportation industry and sold through mass merchandisers.
Principles of consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Revenue recognition:
Revenue from the sale of processed steel and compressed air cylinders is
recognized upon shipment to the customer. Costs and related expenses to
process steel and manufacture compressed air cylinders are recorded as cost of
sales when the related revenue is recognized. Sales returns and allowances
are treated as reductions to net sales.
Cash and cash equivalents:
For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company
considers cash on hand and demand deposits with financial institutions with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash.
Concentration of credit risk:
Huntco Steel sells its products to a wide variety of customers, including
steel service centers and distributors, general fabricators and stampers,
manufacturers of consumer durables, tank manufacturers and energy-related
users, primarily in the midwestern and southern regions of the United States.
Midwest sells its compressed air cylinders to customers in the transportation
industry, as well as through mass merchandisers. Concentration of credit risk
with respect to trade receivables is limited due to the size of the customer
base and its dispersion. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of
its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company
maintains reserves for potential credit losses and such losses have been
within management's expectations. As of April 30, 1997 and 1996, the
Company's allowance for doubtful accounts balance was $544 and $430,
respectively. Expenses related to doubtful accounts were $117, $183, and $186
for the years ended April 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Relationships with suppliers:
The Company procures raw materials from numerous primary steel producers.
Management believes it is not dependent on any one of its suppliers for raw
materials and that its relationships therewith are strong.
Inventories:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined
using the specific identification method for steel processing inventories and
on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis for its compressed air cylinder
products.
Property, plant and equipment:
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective
property, ranging from three to thirty years. Expenditures for repairs,
maintenance and renewals are charged to income as incurred. Expenditures
which improve an asset or extend its useful life are capitalized. When
properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is
included in income.
Leases meeting the criteria of a capital lease are recorded at the present
value of the noncancellable lease payments over the term of the lease.
Properties held under capital leases are amortized over the estimated useful
lives of the assets, ranging from five to twenty years. The interest portion
of the respective capital lease payment is charged to operations.
Environmental policy:
Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed
or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing
condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or
future revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when
environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the costs
can be reasonably estimated. The Company has not been notified by regulatory
authorities of non-compliance with any federal, state or local environmental
laws or regulations, nor is the Company aware of any such non-compliance.
Income taxes:
Deferred income taxes are accounted for under the liability method, whereby
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based upon temporary
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using presently enacted tax rates.
Earnings per common share:
Earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available for
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares and share
equivalents outstanding during the period.
In March 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" (FAS 128), which
requires public entities to present both basic and diluted earnings per share
amounts on the face of their financial statements, replacing the former
calculations of primary and fully diluted earnings per share. The Company
will adopt FAS 128 effective with its fiscal 1998 third quarter, and
anticipates that, when adopted, FAS 128 will not have a material effect on its
reported earnings per common share.
2. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following as of April 30,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
-------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $ 84,046 $39,426
Finished goods 21,523 14,538
-------- -------
$105,569 $53,964
======== =======
</TABLE>
The Company's investment in finished goods includes cold rolled steel coils
produced at the Company's Blytheville, Arkansas facility. These cold rolled
coils can either be sold as master coils, without further processing, or may
be slit, blanked or cut-to-length by the Company prior to final sale.
The Company's cost of sales and gross profit were negatively impacted during
the year ended April 30, 1996, due to the recording of an $8,000 lower of cost
or market inventory adjustment. During the first half of the year ended April
30, 1996, the primary steel producers introduced multiple reductions in the
price of hot rolled steel, which is the primary raw material used in the
Company's steel processing business. These rapid price reductions impacted
the Company when its inventory volume of hot rolled steel coils was at higher
than normal levels. Due to unpredictable lead times for the receipt of
imported hot rolled steel coils purchased by the Company during fiscal 1995,
the delay in the start up of the Company's new cold rolling mill, and as a
result of steel purchased in advance of previously announced increases in raw
material steel prices from the primary producers, which price increases did
not come to pass, the Company's on hand inventory position became higher than
normal during the last half of fiscal 1995 and remained high into the first
half of fiscal 1996. Given the rapid decline in the price of hot rolled steel
coils during this time frame, the Company was not able to turn all of its on
hand inventory, which had been acquired at these higher prices, prior to
granting price accommodations to its customers due to competitive market
circumstances.
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following as of April 30,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Land and improvements $ 3,730 $ 1,981
Buildings 55,525 36,587
Machinery and equipment 94,603 76,749
------- -------
153,858 115,317
Less accumulated depreciation 23,499 17,960
------- -------
130,359 97,357
------- -------
Construction in progress 11,077 22,981
------- -------
$141,436 $120,338
======= =======
</TABLE>
4. LONG-TERM DEBT
On July 14, 1995, the Company issued $50,000 of ten-year term notes (the
"Notes") to a group of domestic commercial lenders. The Notes bear interest
at the fixed rate per annum of 8.13%, with interest payable semiannually each
January 15 and July 15, and mature in equal annual installments of $7,143 on
each July 15, 1999 - 2005. The proceeds from the issuance of the Notes were
utilized to reduce the Company's outstanding borrowings on its line of credit
facility with a group of domestic commercial banks.
The balance of long-term debt primarily consists of amounts outstanding under
a revolving credit agreement entered into with a group of domestic commercial
banks, which agreement provides for borrowings and issuances of letters of
credit in amounts totaling up to $80,000 (increased from $60,000 effective
December 17, 1996) until termination of the agreement on October 31, 1999. As
of April 30, 1997, the Company had unused borrowing capacity of $28,934 under
this agreement, which was further limited as of April 30, 1997, as discussed
in the following paragraph. The agreement provides for borrowings at varying
interest rates set either below the prime rate for LIBOR-based loans or at or
slightly above the prime rate for daily revolving credit advances, payable
monthly or at the maturity of any LIBOR-based loans. The agreement does not
require compensating balances to be maintained.
The Company established a policy to limit its long-term debt, inclusive of
current maturities (i.e., "funded debt"), to no more than 50% of total
capitalization (i.e., the sum of the Company's funded debt and total
shareholders' equity). The Company formalized this policy in connection with
the issuance of the Notes, agreeing with the purchasers of the Notes to a
covenant limiting the Company's funded debt to no more than 50% of total
capitalization. As of April 30, 1997, the ratio of funded debt to total
capitalization was 45.5%. As such, the Company had unused borrowing capacity
of $19,995 as of April 30, 1997, in accordance with this debt covenant.
The Notes and the revolving credit agreement both require the maintenance of
various financial covenants and ratios, all of which the Company was in
compliance with as of April 30, 1997. Principal payments due on the Company's
long-term debt for each of the five fiscal years following April 30, 1997 are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998 $ 189
1999 224
2000 57,349
2001 7,320
2002 7,391
Thereafter 28,593
--------
$101,066
========
</TABLE>
Total cash paid for interest in the years ended April 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995
was $7,552, $4,450, and $1,764, respectively. Of the Company's total interest
costs, it capitalized $1,244, $2,091 and $1,786 to construction in progress
during the years ended April 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
5. Capital stock
The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of $.01 per share par
value preferred stock. The Company is also authorized to issue two classes of
common stock, both of which possess a par value of $.01 per share and have
identical rights, preferences and powers, except the Class B common stock is
entitled to ten votes per share.
On January 30, 1997, the Company issued 225,000 shares of its $.01 par value
Series A preferred stock (the "Series A Preferred"). Shares of Series A
Preferred are cumulative and non-voting, and accrue dividends at the annual
rate of $.888889 per share, with such dividends being payable quarterly
beginning March 1, 1997. Shares of Series A Preferred carry a liquidation
preference of $20.00 per share, and are convertible on a one-for-one basis
into shares of the Company's Class A common stock (a) at any time at the
option of the holder, and (b) at the option of the Company under certain
circumstances, including if at any time the applicable holding period under
Rule 144(k) of Regulation C promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 has
been satisfied and the closing price of the Company's Class A common stock, as
reported by the New York Stock Exchange, is at least $25.00 per share for
thirty consecutive trading days. Under the Company's Restated Articles of
Incorporation, authorized but unissued preferred stock is issuable in series
under such terms and conditions as the Company's Board of Directors may
determine. However, no further shares of Series A Preferred may be issued by
the Company. The Company issued all 225,000 shares of Series A Preferred to
Coil-Tec, Inc. in connection with the Company's acquisition of $4,500 of
depreciable assets and certain other operating assets of Coil-Tec, Inc. on
January 30, 1997.
The Company is authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of Class A common stock,
of which 5,292,000 shares were issued as of April 30, 1997 and 1996. The
Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, of
which 3,650,000 shares were issued as of April 30, 1997 and 1996. Shares of
Class B common stock are not transferrable to persons or entities unaffiliated
with Mr. B. D. Hunter, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, who is in control of all issued and outstanding shares of Class B
common stock through his personal and family interests. All shares of Class B
common stock are convertible into a like number of shares of Class A common
stock at the sole discretion of the holder of such Class B common stock, with
such conversion becoming mandatory at the date which follows ten years after
the death of Mr. B. D. Hunter.
6. Incentive stock plan
The Company maintains an incentive stock plan, which provides for the grant of
non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted shares and
stock appreciation rights to officers and key employees, as well as directors,
of the Company selected by a committee of the Board of Directors. A maximum
of 900,000 shares of Class A common stock may be issued under the plan.
Options issued under the plan may be exercised, subject to a ten-year maximum,
over periods determined by the committee.
A summary of the status of the Company's stock option plan as of April 30,
1997 and 1996 and changes during the years ending on those dates, is presented
below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Weighted Average
Outstanding Exercise Price
----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at April 30, 1995 687,000 $18.73
Options granted 73,000 $19.50
Options exercised (2,000) $17.00
Options canceled or forfeited (12,500) $20.18
------- ------
Balance at April 30, 1996 745,500 $18.78
Options granted 98,500 $12.50
Options exercised - -
Options canceled or forfeited (8,000) $23.13
------- ------
Balance at April 30, 1997 836,000 $18.00
======= ======
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and exercisable as of
April 30, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Outstanding Exercisable
---------------------------- ---------------------
Remaining Average Average
Exercise No. of Average Exercise No. of Exercise
Price Range Options Life Price Options Price
- ------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$21.50-$25.00 237,000 2.8 yrs $21.53 118,300 $21.52
$17.00-$19.50 500,500 4.7 yrs $17.40 395,700 $17.14
$12.50 98,500 4.9 yrs $12.50 - -
------- ------- ------ ------- ------
836,000 4.2 yrs $18.00 514,000 $18.15
======= ======= ====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-
Based Compensation," requires companies to measure employee stock compensation
plans based on the fair value method of accounting. However, the Statement
allows the alternative of continued use of Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," with pro-forma
disclosure of net income and earnings per share determined as if the fair
value based method had been applied in measuring compensation cost. The
Company adopted the new standard in the fiscal year ending April 30, 1997, and
elected the continued use of APB Opinion No. 25. Pro forma disclosure has not
been provided, as the effect on fiscal year 1997 and 1996 net earnings was
immaterial.
7. Income taxes
The components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended April 30,
1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $1,284 $ - $4,736
State 43 (24) 326
------ ------ ------
1,327 (24) 5,062
------ ------ ------
Deferred (primarily Federal):
Current (205) (1,366) (143)
Non-current 2,875 2,091 1,118
------ ------ ------
2,670 725 975
------ ------ ------
Provision for income taxes $3,997 $ 701 $6,037
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax impact of temporary differences between
the amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such
amounts as measured by tax laws and regulations. Deferred income tax
liabilities (assets) are comprised of the following at April 30:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Total deferred tax liabilities,
primarily related to property basis
differentials and related effects,
including accelerated tax depreciation $8,929 $5,133
Total deferred tax assets, related to
non-deductible liabilities and reserves (2,640) (1,514)
------ ------
Deferred tax liabilities, net of $1,465
and $1,260, respectively, reflected
in other current assets $6,289 $3,619
====== ======
</TABLE>
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the maximum statutory
rate of 35% is as follows for the years ended April 30,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Tax at statutory rate $3,670 $ 633 $5,614
State income taxes, net
of federal tax benefit 195 (94) 277
Amortization of goodwill 101 101 101
Other 31 61 45
------ ------ ------
$3,997 $ 701 $6,037
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
During the years ended April 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995, the Company made cash
payments for income taxes of $3,000, $50, and $5,587, respectively. During
the year ended April 30, 1997, the Company claimed Federal tax refunds of
$1,871.
8. Commitments and contingencies
The Company is a party to various claims and legal proceedings generally
incidental to its business. Although the ultimate disposition of these
proceedings is not presently determinable, management does not believe that
adverse determination in any or all of such proceedings will have a material
adverse effect upon the financial condition or the results of operations of
the Company.
The Company leases a variety of assets for use in its operations. With
respect to operating leases of steel processing equipment and certain real
property, the Company has negotiated purchase options which are effective
prior to or at the end of the lease term of such operating lease agreements.
With respect to the Company's operating lease commitments, net aggregate
future lease payments of $31,491 as of April 30, 1997, are payable as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998 $ 3,536
1999 3,795
2000 3,721
2001 3,721
2002 3,696
Thereafter 13,022
-------
$31,491
=======
</TABLE>
9. Quarterly financial data (unaudited)
Summarized quarterly financial data for the years ended April 30, 1997 and
1996 appears below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
First Second Third Fourth Year
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales:
1997 $78,430 $83,983 $73,391 $90,759 $326,563
1996 55,106 62,072 68,486 78,423 264,087
Gross profit (loss):
1997 8,993 9,206 5,776 8,133 32,108
1996 4,774 (3,480)(1) 8,028 8,902 18,224
Net income (loss):
1997 2,570 2,417 140 1,362 6,489
1996 906 (4,653)(1) 2,153 2,702 1,108
Earnings (loss)
per common share:
1997 .29 .27 .01 .15 .72
1996 .10 (.52)(1) .24 .30 .12
(1) See Note 2 for a discussion of the lower of cost or market inventory
adjustment recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 1996.
</TABLE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Huntco Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related
consolidated statements of income, of cash flows, and of changes in
shareholders' equity present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Huntco Inc. and its subsidiaries at April 30, 1997 and 1996, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended April 30, 1997, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted
our audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
May 22, 1997
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
None.
<PAGE>
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Information regarding (i) directors of the Company and (ii) the only executive
officers of the Company (who are also directors of the Company), is
incorporated herein by reference to the information included under the title
"Proposal 1: Election of Directors --Nominees for Directors", "--Information
as of July 1, 1997 Regarding the Nominees for Directors to be Elected in 1997
for Terms Ending in 2000"; and "--Information as of July 1, 1997 Regarding the
Directors Who are Not Nominees for Election and Whose Terms Continue Beyond
1997," contained within the Company's 1997 Proxy Statement. The individuals
identified in the 1997 Proxy Statement as executive officers of the Company
have been appointed to serve as such until their respective successors are
duly elected and have qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or
removal.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
- --------------------------------
Information regarding executive compensation is incorporated herein by
reference to the information included under the titles "Proposal 1: Election
of Directors --Directors' Fees" contained within the Company's 1997 Proxy
Statement; "Executive Compensation --Summary Compensation Table", "--Options/
SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year", "--Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last
Fiscal Year and FY-End Option/SAR Values", "--Certain Contracts", and "--
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" contained within
the Company's 1997 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and
management is incorporated herein by reference to the information included
under the title "Voting, Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof --
Holdings of Management and Principal Shareholders" contained within the
Company's 1997 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions is
incorporated herein by reference to the information included under the title
"Certain Transactions" contained within the Company's 1997 Proxy Statement.
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The Company's financial statements together with the report thereon
of Price Waterhouse LLP dated May 22, 1997, are set forth herein under Item 8.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules -- Omitted, not applicable.
(3) Exhibits
These Exhibits are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table at
Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The following Exhibits listed in the Exhibit
Index are filed with this Report:
4(ii)(b)(3): First Amendment, dated April 30, 1997, to Revolving Credit
Agreement dated December 17, 1996, by and among Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada,
Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., HSI Aviation, Inc., Mercantile Bank National
Association, Harris Trust and Savings Bank, NBD Bank, Bank of America
Illinois, and SunTrust Bank, Atlanta.
10(iii)(A)(6): Description of performance bonus arrangement for the
executive officers for the year ending April 30, 1998.
21: Subsidiaries of the Company.
23(ii): Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP.
24: Powers of Attorney submitted by B. D. Hunter, Robert J. Marischen,
Terry J. Heinz, James J. Gavin, Jr., Donald E. Brandt and Michael M. McCarthy.
27: Financial Data Schedule.
For a listing of each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
required to be filed as an exhibit to this Report, see the Exhibits listed
under Exhibit Nos. 10(iii)(A)(1) through 10(iii)(A)(9).
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company filed a Form 8-K on May 22, 1997, which filing discussed the
Company's earnings for the year ended April 30, 1997, and certain forward-
looking data for the fiscal year ending April 30, 1998.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HUNTCO INC.
(Registrant)
Date: July 21, 1997 By:/s/ Robert J. Marischen
-----------------------
Robert J. Marischen,
Vice Chairman of the Board
and Chief Financial Officer
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints B. D. Hunter and Robert J. Marischen, and each of
them (with full power to each of them to act alone), his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign this report and any and all amendments to this report, and
to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-
in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ B. D. Hunter Director, Chairman of the July 21, 1997
- ---------------------------------- Board and Chief Executive
B. D. Hunter Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Robert J. Marischen Director, Vice Chairman of July 21, 1997
- ---------------------------------- Board and Chief Financial
Robert J. Marischen Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Terry J. Heinz Director, President and July 21, 1997
- ---------------------------------- Chief Operating Officer
Terry J. Heinz
/s/ Donald E. Brandt Director July 21, 1997
- ----------------------------------
Donald E. Brandt
/s/ James J. Gavin, Jr. Director July 21, 1997
- ----------------------------------
James J. Gavin, Jr.
/s/ Michael M. McCarthy Director July 21, 1997
- ----------------------------------
Michael M. McCarthy
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
These Exhibits are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table of Item 601
of Regulation S-K.
2: Omitted - not applicable.
3(i): Restated Articles of Incorporation of Huntco Inc. incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed on July 28, 1995.
3(ii): Bylaws of Huntco Inc., as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3(ii) of the Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on July 28,
1995.
4(i)(a): Reference is made to Article III of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation of Huntco Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the
Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed July 28, 1995.
4(i)(b): Certificate of Designation defining the terms and provisions of the
Company's Series A Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(v)(a) of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1997,
filed on March 14, 1997.
4(i)(c): Registration Rights Agreement dated January 30, 1997, issued in
conjunction with the issuance of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(v)(b) of the Company's Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended January 31, 1997, filed on March 14, 1997.
4(ii)(a)(1): Revolving Credit Agreement dated October 28, 1994, by and among
Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada, Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., and Midwest Products,
Inc. and Mercantile Bank of St. Louis National Association, Harris Trust and
Savings Bank, NBD Bank, N.A., Mark Twain Bank, and Mercantile Bank of St.
Louis National Association as Agent, providing for revolving credit loans and
letters of credit to Huntco Inc. and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount
of up to Sixty Million Dollars ($60.0 million), incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4(v) of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,
1994, filed on December 12, 1994.
4(ii)(a)(2): First Amendment, dated February 28, 1995, to Revolving Credit
Agreement dated October 28, 1994, by and among Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada,
Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., and Midwest Products, Inc. and Mercantile Bank of
St. Louis National Association, Harris Trust and Savings Bank, NBD Bank, N.A.,
Mark Twain Bank, and Mercantile Bank of St. Louis National Association as
Agent, providing for revolving credit loans and letters of credit to Huntco
Inc. and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount of up to Seventy Million
Dollars ($70.0 million), incorporated by reference Exhibit 4(v) of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1995, filed on March 2,
1995.
4(ii)(a)(3): Second Amendment, dated April 27, 1995, to Revolving Credit
Agreement dated October 28, 1994, by and among Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada,
Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., and Midwest Products, Inc. and Mercantile Bank of
St. Louis National Association, Harris Trust and Savings Bank, NBD Bank, N.A.,
Mark Twain Bank, and Mercantile Bank of St. Louis National Association as
Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(ii)(3) of the Company's 1995
Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on July 28, 1995.
4(ii)(a)(4): Third Amendment, dated November 8, 1995, to Revolving Credit
Agreement dated October 28, 1994, by and among Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada,
Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., and Midwest Products, Inc. and Mercantile Bank of
St. Louis National Association, Harris Trust and Savings Bank, NBD Bank, N.A.,
Mark Twain Bank, and Mercantile Bank of St. Louis National Association as
Agent, providing for revolving credit loans and letters of credit to Huntco
Inc. and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount of up to Sixty Million
Dollars ($60.0 million), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(v)(d) of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 1995, filed on November
23, 1995.
4(ii)(a)(5): Fourth Amendment, dated January 31, 1996, to Revolving Credit
Agreement dated October 28, 1994, by and among Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada,
Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., and Midwest Products, Inc. and Mercantile Bank of
St. Louis National Association, Harris Trust and Savings Bank, NBD Bank, N.A.,
Mark Twain Bank, and Mercantile Bank of St. Louis National Association as
Agent, providing for revolving credit loans and letters of credit to Huntco
Inc. and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount of up to Sixty Million
Dollars ($60.0 million), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(v)(d) of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1996, filed on February
28, 1996.
4(ii)(b)(1): Revolving Credit Agreement dated December 17, 1996, by and among
Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada, Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., Midwest Products, Inc.,
HSI Aviation, Inc., Mercantile Bank National Association, Harris Trust and
Savings Bank, NBD Bank, Bank of America Illinois, and SunTrust Bank, Atlanta,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(iii)(a) of the Company's Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended January 31, 1997, filed on March 14, 1997.
4(ii)(b)(2): Form of Revolving Credit Note issued in connection with the
execution of the Revolving Credit Agreement of December 17, 1996 (the
"Agreement"), and a schedule of the amount of each Revolving Credit Note
issued on December 17, 1996 in conjunction with this Agreement, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4(iii)(b) of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended January 31, 1997, filed on March 14, 1997.
4(ii)(b)(3): First Amendment, dated April 30, 1997, to Revolving Credit
Agreement dated December 17, 1996, by and among Huntco Inc., Huntco Nevada,
Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., HSI Aviation, Inc., Mercantile Bank National
Association, Harris Trust and Savings Bank, NBD Bank, Bank of America
Illinois, and SunTrust Bank, Atlanta.
4(ii)(c)(1): Note Purchase Agreement dated July 14, 1995, providing for the
issuance of $50.0 million of 8.13% ten-year term notes, maturing in equal
annual installments from July 15, 1999-2005, by and among Huntco Inc. and each
of the purchasers listed on Schedule A thereto, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4(v)(a) of the Company's Form 8-K filed on July 18, 1995.
4(ii)(c)(2): Individual Notes due July 2005, sold pursuant to the Note
Purchase Agreement dated July 14, 1995, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibits 4(b)-(j) of the Company's Form 8-K filed on July 18, 1995.
4(ii)(c)(3): Subsidiary Guaranty dated July 14, 1995 from Huntco Nevada,
Inc., Huntco Steel, Inc., and Midwest Products, Inc. entered into in
connection with the Note Purchase Agreement dated July 14, 1995, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4(k) of the Company's Form 8-K filed on July
18, 1995.
4(ii)(d)(1): Lease Agreement dated as of June 1, 1992 by and between the City
of Blytheville, Arkansas and Huntco Steel, Inc., which Lease Agreement
represents a capital lease, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10(ii)(D)(1) of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (33-62936)
and filed on May 19, 1993.
4(ii)(d)(2): First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of August 17, 1993
by and between the City of Blytheville, Arkansas and Huntco Steel, Inc., which
Lease Agreement represents a capital lease, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(ii)(D)(1)(ii) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (33-71426) and filed on November 23, 1993.
9: Omitted - not applicable.
10(iii)(A)(1): Form of Executive Employment Agreement, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(1) of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 31, 1993, filed on September 13, 1993.
10(iii)(A)(2): Form of Performance Bonus Agreement for fiscal year ending
April 30, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(3) of the
Company's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on July 29, 1994.
10(iii)(A)(3): Form of Performance Bonus Agreement for fiscal year ending
April 30, 1996, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(3) of the
Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on July 28, 1995.
10(iii)(A)(4): Form of Amended Performance Bonus Agreement for fiscal year
ending April 30, 1996, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1996, filed on February
28, 1996.
10(iii)(A)(5): Description of Performance Bonus Arrangement for executive
officers for the fiscal year ending April 30, 1997, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(5) of the Company's 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed on July 26, 1996.
10(iii)(A)(6): Description of Performance Bonus Arrangement for executive
officers for the fiscal year ending April 30, 1998.
10(iii)(A)(7): Huntco Inc. 1993 Incentive Stock Plan, as Amended and Restated
in 1996, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(2) of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 1996, filed on August 13,
1996.
10(iii)(A)(8): Form of Option Agreement for Awards of Options under 1993
Incentive Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(5) of
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (33-62936) and filed on May
19, 1993.
10(iii)(A)(9): Description of tax reimbursement arrangement between the
Company and its executive employees upon exercise of non-qualified stock
options, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(6) of the
Company's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on July 29, 1994.
11: Omitted - not applicable.
12: Omitted - not applicable.
13: Omitted - not applicable.
16: Omitted - not applicable.
18: Omitted - not applicable.
21: Subsidiaries of the Company.
22: Omitted - not applicable.
23(ii): Consent of Price Waterhouse.
24: Powers of attorney contained on the signature page found herein.
27: Financial Data Schedule.
99: Omitted - not applicable.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
---------------------------------------------
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made
and entered into effective as of the 30th day of April, 1997, by and among
HUNTCO INC., a Missouri corporation ("Borrower"), HUNTCO NEVADA, INC., a
Nevada corporation which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Borrower ("Huntco
Nevada"), HUNTCO STEEL, INC., a Delaware corporation which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Huntco Nevada ("Huntco Steel"), MIDWEST PRODUCTS, INC., a
Missouri corporation which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Huntco Nevada
("Midwest Products") and HSI AVIATION, INC., a Missouri corporation which is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Huntco Steel ("HSI Aviation") (Huntco Nevada,
Huntco Steel, Midwest Products and HSI Aviation are sometimes hereinafter
individually referred to as a "Guarantor" and collectively referred to as the
"Guarantors"), the banks listed on the signature pages hereof (collectively,
the "Banks") and MERCANTILE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking
association, as agent for the Banks (in such capacity, the "Agent").
WITNESSETH:
----------
WHEREAS, Borrower, the Guarantors, the Banks and the Agent have heretofore
entered into that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated December 17, 1996
(the "Revolving Credit Agreement"; all capitalized terms used and not
otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the respective meanings
ascribed to them in the Revolving Credit Agreement as amended by this
Amendment); and
WHEREAS, Borrower and the Guarantors desire to amend the Revolving Credit
Agreement in the manner hereinafter set forth and the Banks and the Agent are
willing to agree thereto on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, Borrower, the Guarantors, the Banks and the Agent hereby agree
as follows:
1. The definition of "Annualized Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA
Ratio" set forth in Section 1.01 of the Revolving Credit Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety.
2. The definitions of "Applicable Commitment Fee Rate", "Applicable
Margin" and "Applicable Standby Letter of Credit Commitment Fee Rate" set
forth in Section 1.01 of the Revolving Credit Agreement are hereby deleted in
their entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:
"Applicable Commitment Fee Rate" shall mean: (a) during the period
commencing December 17, 1996, and ending March 31, 1997, One-Eighth of One
Percent (.125%) per annum; (b) during the period commencing April 1, 1997, and
ending April 30, 1997, Three-Sixteenths of One Percent (.1875%) per annum; and
(c) from and after May 1, 1997, (i) One-Sixteenth of One Percent (.0625%) per
annum if the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was less than 3.0
to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for
which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have
been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a), (ii)
One-Eighth of One Percent (.125%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0 but less
than 3.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of
Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its
Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to
Section 6.01(a), (iii) Three-Sixteenths of One Percent (.1875%) per annum if
the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater
than 3.5 to 1.0 but less than 4.0 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently
ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial statements
of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the
Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a) and (iv) Five-Sixteenths of One Percent
(.3125%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was
equal to or greater than 4.0 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended
fiscal quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of
Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks
pursuant to Section 6.01(a). The determination of the Applicable Commitment
Fee Rate as of any date shall be based on the Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal
quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower
and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant
to Section 6.01(a), and shall be effective for purposes of determining the
Applicable Commitment Fee Rate from and after the first day of the first month
immediately following the date on which such delivery of financial statements
is required until the first day of the first month immediately following the
next such date on which delivery of consolidated financial statements of
Borrower and its Subsidiaries is so required. For example, the Consolidated
Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio as of the end of the fiscal quarter of
Borrower ended January 31, 1997, would be determined from the consolidated
financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of and for fiscal
quarter ended January 31, 1997 (which are required to be delivered to the
Agent and the Banks on or before March 22, 1997), and would be used in
determining the Applicable Commitment Fee Rate from and after April 1, 1997.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall any provision contained in
this definition be construed as permitting Borrower to any time have a
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio greater than the maximum
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio permitted by Section
6.01(q)(ii) of this Agreement at such time.
"Applicable Margin" shall mean:
(a) with respect to Prime Loans: (i) during the period commencing
December 17, 1996, and ending March 31, 1997, Zero Percent (0.00%) per annum;
(ii) during the period commencing April 1, 1997, and ending April 30, 1997,
One-Eighth of One Percent (.125%) per annum; and (iii) from and after May 1,
1997, (A) a negative One-Eighth of One Percent (-.125%) per annum if the
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was less than 3.0 to 1.0 as of
the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for which
consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been
delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a), (B) Zero
Percent (0.00%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA
Ratio was equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0 but less than 3.5 to 1.0 as of
the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for which
consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been
delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a), (C) One-
Quarter of One Percent (.25%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than 3.5 to 1.0 but less
than 4.0 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of
Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its
Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to
Section 6.01(a), (D) Three-Quarters of One Percent (.75%) per annum if the
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than
4.0 to 1.0 but less than 4.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended
fiscal quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of
Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks
pursuant to Section 6.01(a) and (E) One Percent (1.00%) per annum if the
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than
4.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower
for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries
have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a);
and
(b) with respect to LIBOR Loans: (i) during the period commencing
December 17, 1996, and ending March 31, 1997, Three-Quarters of One Percent
(.75%) per annum; (ii) during the period commencing April 1, 1997, and ending
April 30, 1997, Seven-Eighths of One Percent (.875%) per annum; and (iii) from
and after May 1, 1997, (A) Five-Eighths of One Percent (.625%) per annum if
the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was less than 3.0 to 1.0 as
of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for which
consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been
delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a), (B) Three-
Quarters of One Percent (.75%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0 but less
than 3.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of
Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its
Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to
Section 6.01(a), (C) One Percent (1.00%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than 3.5 to 1.0 but less
than 4.0 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of
Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its
Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to
Section 6.01(a), (D) One and One-Half Percent (1.50%) per annum if the
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than
4.0 to 1.0 but less than 4.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended
fiscal quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of
Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks
pursuant to Section 6.01(a) and (E) One and Three-Quarters Percent (1.75%) per
annum if the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or
greater than 4.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal
quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower
and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant
to Section 6.01(a).
The determination of the Applicable Margin as of any date shall be based on
the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio as of the end of the most
recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial
statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent
and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a), and shall be effective for purposes
of determining the Applicable Margin from and after the first day of the first
month immediately following the date on which such delivery of financial
statements is required until the first day of the first month immediately
following the next such date on which delivery of consolidated financial
statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries is so required. For example, the
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio as of the end of the fiscal
quarter of Borrower ended January 31, 1997, would be determined from the
consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of and
for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 1997 (which are required to be
delivered to the Agent and the Banks on or before March 22, 1997), and would
be used in determining the Applicable Margin from and after April 1, 1997.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall any provision contained in
this definition be construed as permitting Borrower to any time have a
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio greater than the maximum
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio permitted by Section
6.01(q)(ii) of this Agreement at such time.
"Applicable Standby Letter of Credit Commitment Fee Rate" shall mean: (a)
during the period commencing December 17, 1996, and ending March 31, 1997, One
Percent (1.00%) per annum; (b) during the period commencing April 1, 1997, and
ending April 30, 1997, One and One-Eighth Percent (1.125%) per annum; and (c)
from and after May 1, 1997, (i) Seven-Eighths of One Percent (.875%) per annum
if the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was less than 3.0 to 1.0
as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for which
consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been
delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a), (ii) One
Percent (1.00%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA
Ratio was equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0 but less than 3.5 to 1.0 as of
the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower for which
consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been
delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a), (iii) One
and One-Quarter Percent (1.25%) per annum if the Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than 3.5 to 1.0 but less
than 4.0 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of
Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its
Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to
Section 6.01(a), (iv) One and Three-Quarters Percent (1.75%) per annum if the
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than
4.0 to 1.0 but less than 4.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended
fiscal quarter of Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of
Borrower and its Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks
pursuant to Section 6.01(a) and (v) Two Percent (2.00%) per annum if the
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio was equal to or greater than
4.5 to 1.0 as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of Borrower
for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries
have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to Section 6.01(a).
The determination of the Applicable Standby Letter of Credit Commitment Fee
Rate as of any date shall be based on the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated
EBITDA Ratio as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of
Borrower for which consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its
Subsidiaries have been delivered to the Agent and the Banks pursuant to
Section 6.01(a), and shall be effective for purposes of determining the
Applicable Standby Letter of Credit Commitment Fee Rate from and after the
first day of the first month immediately following the date on which such
delivery of financial statements is required until the first day of the first
month immediately following the next such date on which delivery of
consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its Subsidiaries is so
required. For example, the Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio as
of the end of the fiscal quarter of Borrower ended January 31, 1997, would be
determined from the consolidated financial statements of Borrower and its
Subsidiaries as of and for fiscal quarter ended January 31, 1997 (which are
required to be delivered to the Agent and the Banks on or before March 22,
1997), and would be used in determining the Applicable Standby Letter of
Credit Commitment Fee Rate from and after April 1, 1997. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in no event shall any provision contained in this definition be
construed as permitting Borrower to any time have a Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio greater than the maximum Consolidated Debt to
Consolidated EBITDA Ratio permitted by Section 6.01(q)(ii) of this Agreement
at such time.
3. The definition of "Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio" set forth
in Section 1.01 of the Revolving Credit Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety.
4. The definition of "Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio" set
forth in Section 1.01 of the Revolving Credit Agreement is hereby deleted in
its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:
"Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio" shall mean, as of the
last day of any fiscal quarter of Borrower, the ratio of (a) Consolidated Debt
as of such day to (b) Consolidated EBITDA for the four (4) consecutive fiscal
quarter period of Borrower ending on such day.
5. The following new definitions of "Consolidated EBITDAR", "Consolidated
Interest and Operating Lease Expense Coverage Ratio", "Consolidated Operating
Lease Expense", "Operating Lease Expense" and "Operating Lease" are hereby
added to Section 1.01 of the Revolving Credit Agreement:
"Consolidated EBITDAR" shall mean, for the period in question, the sum of
(a) Consolidated Net Income during such period plus (b) to the extent deducted
in determining Consolidated Net Income, the sum of (i) the Consolidated
Interest Expense during such period, plus (ii) all provisions for any Federal,
state, local and/or foreign income taxes made by Borrower and its Subsidiaries
during such period (whether paid or deferred), plus (iii) all depreciation and
amortization expenses of Borrower and its Subsidiaries during such period plus
(iv) Consolidated Operating Lease Expense during such period, all determined
on a consolidated basis and in accordance with GAAP.
"Consolidated Interest and Operating Lease Expense Coverage Ratio" shall
mean, for the period in question, the ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDAR during
such period to (b) the sum of (i) Consolidated Interest Expense during such
period plus (ii) Consolidated Operating Lease Expense during such period, all
determined on a consolidated basis and in accordance with GAAP.
"Consolidated Operating Lease Expense" shall mean, for the period in
question, the aggregate amount of all Operating Lease Expenses of Borrower and
its Subsidiaries during such period, all determined on a consolidated basis
and in accordance with GAAP.
"Operating Lease" shall mean any lease of Property, whether real and/or
personal, by a Person as lessee which is not a Capitalized Lease.
"Operating Lease Expenses" shall mean with respect to any Person, for the
period in question, the aggregate amount of rental and other expenses incurred
by such Person in respect of Operating Leases during such period, all
determined in accordance with GAAP.
6. Section 6.01(q)(ii) of the Revolving Credit Agreement is hereby deleted
in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:
"(ii) "Maximum Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio". Borrower
will have and maintain (A) as of the last day of each of the fiscal quarters
of Borrower ending on April 30, 1997, July 31, 1997, and October 31, 1997, a
Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio of no more than 4.75 to 1.0,
(B) as of the last day of the fiscal quarter of Borrower ending on January 31,
1998, a Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio of no more than 4.50 to
1.0, (C) as of the last day of the fiscal quarter of Borrower ending on April
30, 1998, a Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio of no more than
4.25 to 1.0 and (D) as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of Borrower
ending on or after July 31, 1998, a Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA
Ratio of no more than 4.0 to 1.0."
7. Section 6.01(q)(iv) of the Revolving Credit Agreement is hereby deleted
in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:
"(iv) "Minimum Consolidated Interest and Operating Lease Expense Coverage
Ratio." Borrower will have and maintain a Consolidated Interest and Operating
Lease Expense Coverage Ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0 for each period of four
(4) consecutive fiscal quarters of Borrower commencing with the four (4)
consecutive fiscal quarter period ending April 30, 1997."
8. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Amendment, Borrower shall
pay the Agent for the ratable benefit of the Banks a nonrefundable amendment
fee in the amount of $24,000.00 (the "Amendment Fee").
9. Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Amendment to the
contrary, this Amendment shall not be effective unless and until the Agent
shall have received:
(a) counterparts of this Amendment, duly executed by Borrower, each of
the Guarantors and each of the Banks;
(b) a copy of resolutions of the Executive Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Borrower and/or the Board of Directors of Borrower, duly
adopted, which authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this
Amendment, certified by the Secretary of Borrower;
(c) a copy of resolutions of the Board of Directors of Huntco Nevada,
duly adopted, which authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this
Amendment, certified by the Secretary of Huntco Nevada;
(d) a copy of resolutions of the Board of Directors of Huntco Steel,
duly adopted, which authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this
Amendment, certified by the Secretary of Huntco Steel;
(e) a copy of resolutions of the Board of Directors of Midwest Products,
duly adopted, which authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this
Amendment, certified by the Secretary of Midwest Products;
(f) a copy of resolutions of the Board of Directors of HSI Aviation,
duly adopted, which authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this
Amendment, certified by the Secretary of HSI Aviation;
(g) an incumbency certificate, executed by the Secretary of Borrower,
which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of all of the
officers of Borrower executing this Amendment;
(h) an incumbency certificate, executed by the Secretary of Huntco
Nevada, which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of all
of the officers of Huntco Nevada executing this Amendment;
(i) an incumbency certificate, executed by the Secretary of Huntco
Steel, which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of all
of the officers of Huntco Steel executing this Amendment;
(j) an incumbency certificate, executed by the Secretary of Midwest
Products, which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of
all of the officers of Midwest Products executing this Amendment;
(k) an incumbency certificate, executed by the Secretary of HSI
Aviation, which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of
all of the officers of HSI Aviation executing this Amendment;
(l) a certificate of corporate good standing of Borrower issued by the
Secretary of State of the State of Missouri;
(m) a certificate of corporate good standing of Huntco Nevada issued by
the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada;
(n) a certificate of corporate good standing of Huntco Steel issued by
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
(o) a certificate of corporate good standing of Midwest Products issued
by the Secretary of State of the State of Missouri;
(p) a certificate of corporate good standing of HSI Aviation issued by
the Secretary of State of the State of Missouri; and
(q) the Amendment Fee.
10. Borrower hereby agrees to reimburse the Agent upon demand for all
out-of-pocket costs and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys' fees and expenses, incurred by the Agent in the preparation,
negotiation and execution of this Amendment. All of the obligations of
Borrower under this paragraph shall survive the payment of the Borrower's
Obligations and the termination of the Revolving Credit Agreement.
11. All references in the Revolving Credit Agreement to "this Agreement"
and any other references of similar import shall henceforth mean the Revolving
Credit Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Except to the extent
specifically amended by this Amendment, all of the terms, provisions,
conditions, covenants, representations and warranties contained in the
Revolving Credit Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect and
the same are hereby ratified and confirmed.
12. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
Borrower, the Guarantors, the Banks, the Agent and their respective successors
and assigns, except that neither Borrower nor any of the Guarantors may
assign, transfer or delegate any of their respective rights or obligations
hereunder.
13. Borrower hereby represents and warrants to the Banks and the Agent
that:
(a) the execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of this
Amendment are within the corporate powers of Borrower, have been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate action and require no action by or in
respect of, or filing with, any governmental or regulatory body, agency or
official or any other Person;
(b) the execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of this
Amendment do not conflict with, or result in a breach of the terms, conditions
or provisions of, or constitute a default under or result in any violation of,
the terms of the Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws of Borrower, any
applicable law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment or decree of any court
or governmental or regulatory agency or instrumentality or any agreement,
document or instrument to which Borrower is a party or by which Borrower or
any of its property or assets is bound or to which Borrower or any of its
property or assets is subject;
(c) this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by Borrower and
constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Borrower enforceable in
accordance with its terms; and
(d) as of the date hereof, all of the representations and warranties of
Borrower set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement are true and correct in
all material respects and no Default or Event of Default under or within the
meaning of the Revolving Credit Agreement has occurred and is continuing.
14. Each of the Guarantors hereby represents and warrants to the Banks and
the Agent that:
(a) the execution, delivery and performance by such Guarantor of this
Amendment are within the corporate powers of such Guarantor, have been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate action and require no action by or in
respect of, or filing with, any governmental or regulatory body, agency or
official or any other Person;
(b) the execution, delivery and performance by such Guarantor of this
Amendment do not conflict with, or result in a breach of the terms, conditions
or provisions of, or constitute a default under or result in any violation of,
the terms of the Certificate or Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws of such
Guarantor, any applicable law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment or
decree of any court or governmental or regulatory agency or instrumentality or
any agreement, document or instrument to which such Guarantor is a party or by
which such Guarantor or any of its property or assets is bound or to which
such Guarantor or any of its property or assets is subject;
(c) this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by such
Guarantor and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of such
Guarantor enforceable in accordance with its terms; and
(d) as of the date hereof, all of the representations, warranties and
covenants of such Guarantor set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement are
true and correct and no Default or Event of Default under or within the
meaning of the Revolving Credit Agreement has occurred and is continuing.
15. In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between this Amendment
and the Revolving Credit Agreement, the terms, provisions and conditions
contained in this Amendment shall govern and control.
16. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the substantive laws of the State of Missouri (without reference to conflict
of law principles).
17. ORAL AGREEMENTS OR COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT OR TO
FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT, INCLUDING PROMISES TO EXTEND OR
RENEW SUCH DEBT, ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE. TO PROTECT BORROWER, THE GUARANTORS,
THE BANKS AND THE AGENT FROM MISUNDERSTANDING OR DISAPPOINTMENT, ANY
AGREEMENTS REACHED BY BORROWER, THE GUARANTORS, THE BANKS AND THE AGENT
COVERING SUCH MATTERS ARE CONTAINED IN THE REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT AS
AMENDED BY THIS AMENDMENT AND THE OTHER TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS, WHICH REVOLVING
CREDIT AGREEMENT AS AMENDED BY THIS AMENDMENT AND OTHER TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
ARE A COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE AGREEMENTS AMONG BORROWER, THE
GUARANTORS, THE BANKS AND THE AGENT, EXCEPT AS BORROWER, THE GUARANTORS, THE
BANKS AND THE AGENT MAY LATER AGREE IN WRITING TO MODIFY THEM.
18. This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto
and hereto were upon the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower, the Guarantors, the Banks and the Agent have
executed this First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement effective as of
the 30th day of April, 1997.
HUNTCO INC.
By: /s/ Anthony J. Verkruyse
Title: Vice President, Secretary & Treasurer
HUNTCO NEVADA, INC.
By: /s/ George A. Stoecklin
Title: President
HUNTCO STEEL, INC.
By: /s/ Anthony J. Verkruyse
Title: Vice President & Secretary
MIDWEST PRODUCTS, INC.
By: /s/ Anthony J. Verkruyse
Title: Vice President & Secretary
HSI AVIATION, INC.
By: /s/ Anthony J. Verkruyse
Title: Vice President & Secretary
MERCANTILE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Stephen M. Reese
Title: Vice President
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK
By: /s/ Donald J. Buse
Title: Vice President
NBD BANK
By: /s/ Paul R. DeMelo
Title: Vice President
BANK OF AMERICA ILLINOIS
By: /s/ Steven T. Standbridge
Title: Vice President
SUNTRUST BANK, ATLANTA
By: /s/ Linda L. Dash
Title: Vice President
MERCANTILE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Agent
By: /s/ Stephen M. Reese
Title: Vice President
Description of performance bonus arrangement for executive officers for the
fiscal year ending April 30, 1998 ("fiscal 1998"):
The executive officers of the Company will be entitled to receive
incentive bonus payments based on the Company's quarterly, year-to-date and
full year earnings per share for fiscal 1998.
If earnings per share for the first quarter of fiscal 1998 is at least
$0.23, the executive officers would each earn 10% of their respective annual
base salaries for fiscal 1998 ("fiscal 1998 base salaries"). If first quarter
earnings per share is at least $0.28, they each would earn 20% of their
respective fiscal 1998 base salaries.
If after the first two quarters of fiscal 1998, earnings per share is at
least $0.48, $0.59 or $0.70, each would receive 20%, 40% or 60% of their
respective fiscal 1998 base salaries, less the incentive bonus earned for the
first quarter of fiscal 1998.
If earnings per share for the third quarter of fiscal 1998 is at least
$0.27, the executive officers would each earn 10% of their respective fiscal
1998 base salaries. If third quarter earnings per share is at least $0.33,
they each would earn 20% of their respective fiscal 1998 base salaries.
If earnings per share for the full year of fiscal 1998 are at least
$1.15, $1.40 or $1.65, each of the executive officers would earn 40%, 80% or
120% of their respective fiscal 1998 base salaries, less all incentive bonus
amounts previously earned under this fiscal 1998 performance bonus
arrangement. If full year earnings per share fall between the aforementioned
benchmarks, the percentage of their respective fiscal 1998 base salaries used
to calculate the full year annual incentive bonus shall be the prorated
percentage between the applicable full year earnings per share targets.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
------------------------------
Huntco Nevada, Inc., a Nevada corporation
Huntco Steel, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Midwest Products, Inc., a Missouri corporation
HSI Aviation, Inc., a Missouri corporation
CONSENT OF PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-68488, 33-71610, 333-662, and 333-19461) of
Huntco Inc. of our report dated May 22, 1997, appearing under Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
July 24, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO OF HUNTCO INC. AT AND FOR
THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END> APR-30-1997
<CASH> 1,124
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 46,996
<ALLOWANCES> 544
<INVENTORY> 105,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 157,128
<PP&E> 164,935
<DEPRECIATION> 23,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 307,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 77,626
<BONDS> 100,877
0
4,500
<COMMON> 90
<OTHER-SE> 116,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 307,318
<SALES> 326,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 326,563
<CGS> 294,455
<TOTAL-COSTS> 294,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 6,239
<INCOME-PRETAX> 10,486
<INCOME-TAX> 3,997
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 6,489
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 6,489
<EPS-PRIMARY> .72
<EPS-DILUTED> .72
</TABLE>
