<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
X Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
___ Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended DECEMBER 31, 1996, or
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
___ Exchange Act of 1934 For the period from ____________ to ______________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1934 ACT FILE NUMBER: 0-25968
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 54-1681657
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2345 CRYSTAL DRIVE
CRYSTAL CITY, VA
(Address of principal 22202
executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (703) 920-8500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
CLASS A UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
(Title of Class)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the proxy statement of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty,
Inc. for its annual shareholders' meeting to be held in 1997 are incorporated by
reference into Part III.
<PAGE>
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
When used throughout this report, the words "believes", "anticipates", and
"expects" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such statements indicate that assumptions have been used that are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual
financial results or management plans and objectives to differ materially from
those projected or expressed herein, including: the effect of national and
regional economic conditions, particularly with regard to the levels of
multifamily property occupancy and rental growth in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area; the partnership's ability to identify and secure additional
properties and sites that meet its criteria for acquisition or development; the
acceptance of the partnership's financing plans by the capital markets, and the
effect of prevailing market interest rates and the pricing of the partnership's
units; and other risks described from time-to-time in the partnership's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these uncertainties, readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. The partnership
undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to
these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events
or circumstances.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
(the "Operating Partnership"), was formed in 1993 and commenced operations on
June 30, 1994. It is managed by its general partner, Charles E. Smith
Residential Realty, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), which is a
self-administered and self-managed equity real estate investment trust ("REIT").
The Company was organized in 1993 and also commenced operations on June 30, 1994
upon completion of its initial public offering (the "Initial Public Offering").
The Operating Partnership and the Company are engaged primarily in the
acquisition, development, management and operation of multifamily properties in
the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The Operating Partnership, together with
the Company and their respective subsidiaries as described below, is a fully
integrated real estate organization with in-house acquisition, development,
financing, marketing, leasing and property management expertise. The Operating
Partnership's primary strategy for growth is to acquire, develop, own and manage
high quality multifamily properties for income generation and long-term value
appreciation.
The Company is the sole general partner of and holds approximately 49.4% of
the units of limited partnership interest ("Units") in the Operating Partnership
as of March 20, 1997. The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership
are the former limited and general partners of properties and the former owners
of the property service businesses acquired by the Operating Partnership either
at the time of its formation in June 1994 or thereafter (see "History of the
Company" below). The Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries own all of the
properties, property interests, and business assets and conduct all operations
on behalf of the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Operating
Partnership owns 100% of the nonvoting common stock, which represents 99% of the
total economic interest, of three operating companies (collectively, the
"Property Service
<PAGE>
Businesses") which provide property services to the properties owned by the
Operating Partnership and to other multifamily, retail, and office properties.
The three Property Service Businesses are: Smith Realty Company, which provides
management, leasing, financing, development and insurance services; Consolidated
Engineering Services, Inc., which provides engineering and technical services;
and Smith Management Construction, Inc., which provides tenant construction and
renovation services. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership,
the Company has the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of the
Operating Partnership, subject to the consent of the holders of Units in
connection with the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Operating Partnership. Some references made herein to the Company include the
Operating Partnership and the Property Service Businesses, as the context
requires.
As of March 1, 1997, the Operating Partnership, directly or through its
subsidiaries, owned 44 multifamily apartment properties containing a total of
17,028 units (the "Multifamily Properties") and two retail centers containing
approximately 436,000 square feet of retail space (the "Retail Properties"), all
located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area (collectively, the
"Properties").
The executive offices of the Operating Partnership and the Company are
located at 2345 Crystal Drive, Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia 22202, and its
telephone number is (703) 920-8500.
HISTORY OF THE COMPANY
The Operating Partnership was formed to succeed to the property assets of
38 partnerships (the "Property Partnerships") and certain asset management and
property service businesses of the Charles E. Smith Companies (the "Smith
Companies"). On June 30, 1994, the Company consummated an initial public
offering (the "Initial Public Offering") of 8,632,800 shares of its common
stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), and a private placement of
416,667 shares of its Common Stock. The Company contributed the net proceeds of
such offerings to the Operating Partnership in return for 9,049,467 Units of
general and limited partnership interest therein. On that same date, (i) the
Operating Partnership acquired, in exchange for 12,131,292 Units, 32 Properties,
partial interests in two additional properties, all of the non-voting common
stock of the Property Service Businesses (representing 99% of the economic
interest), and notes of the Property Service Businesses in the aggregate amount
of $44.5 million; (ii) the Operating Partnership, through its partnership
subsidiaries, issued $352.4 million of fixed-rate indebtedness secured by
certain of the Properties in private placements to institutional investors and
assumed certain other indebtedness (the "Mortgage Loans"); (iii) the Operating
Partnership applied the proceeds of the Mortgage Loans and the Company's
contribution of offering proceeds to repay approximately $454 million of
mortgage indebtedness, $26.2 million in related party indebtedness and $11.1
million in notes payable to a bank, to pay $13.8 million in prepayment penalties
related to the early extinguishment of debt, to pay $14.7 million in transfer
taxes and other costs associated with the formation of the Company and the
Operating Partnership, and to pay $18.5 million of mortgage recording taxes,
origination fees and other expenses associated with the Mortgage Loans, and to
supply $15.4 million of working capital; and (iv) the Operating Partnership
established a $100 million line of credit to fund development activities and
property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes (collectively, the
"Formation Transactions").
<PAGE>
On February 19, 1997, the Company consummated a second stock offering,
issuing an additional 3,105,000 shares of Common Stock, and the proceeds of such
offering were used to purchase an additional 3,105,000 Units in the Operating
Partnership. Since the Formation Transactions and through March 15, 1997, the
Operating Partnership developed one and acquired 14 Multifamily Properties with
a total of 5,193 apartment units; see "Recent Developments" below.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Operating Partnership seeks growth in funds from operations (a common
measure of equity real estate investment trust performance, defined as net
income [loss] computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, excluding gains or losses from debt restructuring and sales of
property plus depreciation and amortization of assets unique to the real
estate industry) while preserving and enhancing property values by pursuing the
following strategies: (i) maximizing cash flow from operations of the Properties
by seeking to maintain high occupancy levels, obtain rent increases, manage
tenant turnover efficiently, make strategic capital investments, expand the
availability of furnished rental apartments, initiate new tenant fees and
control operating expenses; (ii) acquiring additional multifamily properties for
Common Stock, Units, or cash in situations where, in the judgment of management,
the Operating Partnership's business strengths have the potential to increase
property performance and value; (iii) developing new multifamily properties
consistent with the predecessor Smith Companies' historical policies of
constructing and maintaining high quality properties for long-term income and
value enhancement; and (iv) actively promoting the comprehensive property
services of the Property Service Businesses to unaffiliated property owners. In
addition to its activities in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, the
Operating Partnership also will seek to acquire properties or portfolios with
characteristics similar to the Operating Partnership's portfolio in other
markets that offer opportunities for profitable investment and long-term growth.
FINANCING STRATEGY
The Operating Partnership's policy, which is set by the Board of Directors
of the Company, is to incur debt (including debt incurred under its lines of
credit) only if upon such incurrence its ratio of debt to total market
capitalization would be 60% or less. The Operating Partnership may reevaluate
this financing policy from time to time in light of then current economic
conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of
properties, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors. At December
31, 1996, the Operating Partnership's debt to total market capitalization ratio
was 45.9%, and this ratio was reduced further with the Company's stock offering
in the first quarter of 1997. The Company's Board of Directors may modify this
financing policy and may increase or decrease the targeted ratio of debt to
total market capitalization. To the extent that the Company's Board of Directors
determines to seek additional capital for the Operating Partnership, the Company
or the Operating Partnership may raise such capital through additional equity
offerings, debt financing or retention of cash flow (subject to provisions in
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended [the "Code"] requiring the
distribution by a REIT of a certain percentage of taxable income and taking into
account taxes that would be imposed on undistributed taxable income), or a
combination of these methods. The Company currently has on file with the
<PAGE>
Securities and Exchange Commission an effective registration statement which
allows the sale of up to $200,000,000 in debt or equity securities, of which
approximately $112,000,000 remains after the secondary stock offering which
occurred in the first quarter of 1997. As long as the Operating Partnership is
in existence, the net proceeds of all equity capital raised by the Company will
be contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for limited partnership
interests in the Operating Partnership. The Company and the Operating
Partnership also may issue securities senior to the Common Stock or Units,
including preferred stock and debt securities (either of which may be
convertible into Common Stock or Units or may be accompanied by warrants to
purchase Common Stock or Units). The Company's Board of Directors may decide to
finance acquisitions through the exchange of properties or the issuance of
additional shares of Common Stock, Units or other securities.
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
The Operating Partnership and its Property Service Businesses are
experienced in the management and leasing of multifamily and retail properties.
The Operating Partnership believes that the management and leasing of its own
portfolio has resulted in consistent income growth and reduced operating
expenses. The Property Service Businesses have provided the Operating
Partnership both with a source of cash flow that is relatively stable and with
economies of scale in conjunction with the management and leasing of its own
Properties. These Property Service Businesses also allow the Operating
Partnership and its subsidiaries to establish additional relationships with
tenants that benefit the Properties.
PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES
RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT AND LEASING. The residential management and leasing
business of Smith Realty Company, an operating subsidiary of the Operating
Partnership, is a long-established, integrated property management business with
extensive experience in leasing and managing multifamily properties. This
subsidiary has been managing and leasing multifamily housing in the Washington,
D.C. metropolitan area since 1946 and as of March 20, 1997, manages 59 apartment
properties (including the 44 Multifamily Properties and 15 other multifamily
communities with approximately 4,200 apartment units). It also assists in the
development and acquisition of additional multifamily properties and carries out
a periodic inspection program that addresses all aspects of the property and
property management.
RETAIL MANAGEMENT, LEASING, AND DEVELOPMENT. The retail management and
leasing business, also conducted through Smith Realty Company, approaches the
management and leasing of its retail portfolio with an integrated program of
regular direct communication with retail tenants, proactive assistance with
marketing, merchandising and monitoring store operations, and maintenance. A
retail marketing staff works to promote the shopping centers as a whole and to
work with individual tenants to ensure the effectiveness of store design,
marketing, merchandising and sales efforts. The retail management and leasing
group, in addition to providing complete property management and leasing
services for the two Retail Properties, with approximately 436,000 square feet
of retail space, also provides such services for a fee to three other retail
properties with
<PAGE>
approximately 293,000 square feet of retail space that are owned by affiliated
third parties, and provides retail leasing and brokerage services for
additional, unaffiliated third parties on a fee-for-service basis. Beginning in
1995, Smith Realty Company also contracted with an unaffiliated third party to
provide development services for a proposed 660,000 square foot retail project
on a fee-for-service basis.
FINANCING AND CORPORATE SERVICES. The financing and corporate services
businesses, also conducted through Smith Realty Company, enable a central office
to provide supporting services in the areas of financing, insurance, legal
advice, accounting, information systems, human resources, office services and
marketing services to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, as well as
to other companies. The finance department negotiates and administers all debt
financing for the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, and, for a fee,
other properties owned by third parties (the majority of which are affiliated
with Robert H. Smith and Robert P. Kogod, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and
Co-Chairmen of the Board of the Company and the owners of approximately 12.4% of
the shares and Units). This responsibility includes obtaining new sources of
funding by actively soliciting prospective lenders, monitoring, analyzing and
negotiating changes in loan status and/or structure, and satisfying reporting
requirements of lenders. Financing services were performed for approximately
$242 million of refinancing in 1996. The accounting department is responsible
for all accounting, auditing and controls, procedures and management information
systems as they relate to the Operating Partnership and the Properties, and for
certain other partnerships and corporate entities (including affiliates of
Messrs. Smith and Kogod). The legal department provides real estate and
corporate advice to management, performs legal services and in some cases
coordinates representation by outside counsel. The marketing department develops
and implements a variety of marketing programs for the Operating Partnership and
its subsidiaries, and for specific properties. The human resources department
administers all personnel functions. The insurance subsidiary provides property
and casualty insurance placement services for both corporate and individual
property requirements.
ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES. The engineering and technical services
business is conducted through Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc., an
operating subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, which manages, operates,
maintains and repairs the "physical plant" of office, multifamily, and retail
properties. Through its staff of on-site and off-site engineers, supervisors,
technical specialists and maintenance personnel, this subsidiary provides
various services, including on-site building systems operations and maintenance,
engineering and technical consulting, automated environmental monitoring and
controls, preventive maintenance, management of building environmental systems
and repair and replacement of mechanical/electrical systems. This business
serves the Properties and also provides facilities management services for both
affiliated and unaffiliated third parties, including condominium, bank,
university and government buildings. During 1996, services were provided with
respect to approximately 28 million square feet of facilities.
INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION SERVICES. The management construction
business, conducted through Smith Management Construction, Inc., an operating
subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, is a construction management and
general contracting company that provides interior construction and renovation
services to the Properties and various other affiliated and unaffiliated third
party clients. This subsidiary focuses primarily on capital improvement projects
and office and
<PAGE>
retail tenant space construction and alteration, and provides the expertise
necessary to take a project from the initial planning and preconstruction stage
through the completion of the construction phase. In 1996, oversight was
provided to over $58 million of construction activity.
EMPLOYEES
As of February 28, 1997, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries had
approximately 1,324 full-time and part-time employees, the latter primarily
employed in on-site clerical positions. This total includes 614 employees who
provide on-site property services and, in the Property Service Businesses, 430
persons in its engineering and technical services subsidiary, 85 persons in its
interior or construction and renovation subsidiary, and 192 persons in its
residential and retail leasing and management, finance, and corporate services
subsidiary.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY. The Operating Partnership has executed a contract to
purchase for $9.1 million approximately 17 acres of land for the development of
an approximately 630-unit, multi-phase, mid-rise and garden apartment community
in Springfield, Virginia. The site is strategically located adjacent to a new
Metrorail and commuter rail station which is under construction and a regional
shopping mall, and offers convenient access to the I-495 Capital Beltway and I-
395, a major route into Washington, D.C. Budgeted costs for this project are
expected to be approximately $60 million and construction is scheduled to
commence early in the summer of 1997. In addition, the Operating Partnership is
currently engaged in pre-development activities on two additional sites which
are in desirable submarkets: a residential development site in Reston, Virginia,
and an infill site in northwest Washington, D.C.
ACQUISITION PROPERTIES. During 1996, the Operating Partnership acquired
four properties containing 1,049 apartment units, as further described below.
Charter Oak. This 262-unit, garden-style, multifamily complex located in
Reston, Virginia was acquired in March 1996 for approximately $13.7 million cash
and 22,059 Operating Partnership Units valued at $0.5 million (based on the
market price of the Company's stock on the date of the acquisition). It is
located in Virginia's fast growing high-tech corridor along the Dulles Access
Road, adjacent to a golf course and within walking distance of Reston Town
Center (a major retail and office complex). During the fourth quarter of 1996,
Charter Oak had an average occupancy of approximately 97.1% and average monthly
rental revenue per apartment unit of approximately $873.
Governor Spotswood. This 47-unit, garden-style, multifamily apartment
complex located in Old Town, Alexandria was acquired in March, 1996 for
approximately $2.8 million in cash. It was combined for management purposes with
its sister property, Boulevard of Old Town, which the Operating Partnership
acquired in 1995, and renamed Boulevard of Old Town Phase II. It is adjacent to
specialty boutique retailers and first class restaurants in the historic Old
Town area of Alexandria. During the fourth quarter of 1996, this property had
an average occupancy of
<PAGE>
approximately 96.2% and average monthly rental revenue per apartment unit of
approximately $798.
Van Ness South. This 625-unit, high-rise, multifamily apartment building in
northwest Washington, D.C. was acquired in July, 1996 for approximately $41.8
million in cash. This 11-story, luxury high-rise is located within walking
distance of the Van Ness Metrorail station. Its amenities include three levels
of underground parking, a large outdoor swimming pool and a new fitness center.
During the fourth quarter of 1996, Van Ness South had an average occupancy of
approximately 98.4% and average monthly rental revenue per apartment unit of
approximately $994.
1841 Columbia Road. This 115-unit, high-rise, multifamily apartment
building in northwest Washington, D.C. was acquired in August 1996 for
approximately $5.3 million, consisting of assumed debt of approximately $3.3
million and 79,600 Operating Partnership Units valued at $2.0 million (based on
the market price of the Company's stock on the date of the acquisition). This
eight-story high-rise is located near the Woodley Park Metrorail station in
Washington, D.C.'s Adams Morgan neighborhood. The Property includes
approximately 16,000 square feet of street-level retail space, and among the
tenants are a NationsBank branch office and several restaurants. During the
fourth quarter of 1996, the Property had an average occupancy of approximately
97.5% and average monthly rental revenue per apartment unit of approximately
$600.
In addition to the above-described properties, the Operating Partnership
also acquired three multifamily properties with 1,828 apartment units in the
first quarter of 1997, as further described below.
Crystal Plaza. This 540-unit, high-rise, multifamily apartment building
located in Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia, was acquired in February 1997 for
307,079 Operating Partnership Units with an approximate value of $8.7 million
(based upon the price of the Company's stock on the date of the acquisition),
and the assumption of an existing mortgage, for an approximate total cost of
$43.1 million. The property was developed and managed by the Smith Companies,
predecessor to the Operating Partnership, and remains subject to a 5.1% net
profits interest in favor of an unaffiliated third party. During 1996, this
property had an average occupancy of 98.7% and average monthly rental revenue
per apartment unit of approximately $1,167.
Crystal Towers. This 912-unit, high-rise, multifamily apartment building
located in Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia, was acquired in February 1997 for
842,544 Operating Partnership Units with an approximate value of $23.9 million
(based upon the price of the Company's stock on the date of the acquisition),
$1.6 million in cash, and the assumption of an existing mortgage for an
approximate total cost of $71.8 million. The property was developed and managed
by the Smith Companies, predecessor to the Operating Partnership. During 1996,
the property had an average occupancy of 97.6% and average monthly rental
revenue per apartment unit of approximately $1,047.
Kenmore. This 376-unit, high-rise multifamily apartment building located in
northeast Washington, D.C., was acquired in March, 1997 for 510,674 Operating
Partnership Units with an approximate value of $14.5 million (based upon the
price of the Company's stock on the date of the acquisition) and the assumption
of an existing mortgage, for an approximate total cost of $15.8 million.
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following is a biographical summary of the experience of the executive
officers of the Company:
ROBERT H. SMITH. Mr. Smith is Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman of
the Board of the Company and Co-Chairman of the Board of each of the Property
Service Businesses. Since 1962, Mr. Smith has been the President, Chief
Executive Officer and a director of Charles E. Smith Construction, Inc. and its
predecessor companies, where he oversees and directs all phases of development
and construction of the Smith Companies' office, retail and residential real
estate projects. He is also Secretary/Treasurer and a director of Charles E.
Smith Management, Inc., which specializes in the management of office buildings.
Mr. Smith joined the Smith Companies in 1950. Mr. Smith is 68 years old and the
brother-in-law of Robert P. Kogod.
ROBERT P. KOGOD. Mr. Kogod is Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman of
the Board of the Company and Co-Chairman of the Board of each of the Property
Service Businesses. Since 1964, Mr. Kogod has been the President, Chief
Executive Officer and a director of Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. where he
oversees and directs all phases of the leasing and management of the Smith
Companies' office real estate portfolios. He is also Secretary/Treasurer and a
director of Charles E. Smith Construction, Inc., an affiliated company that
specializes in the development and construction of office, retail and
residential projects. Mr. Kogod joined the Smith Companies in 1959. Mr. Kogod is
65 years old and the brother-in-law of Robert H. Smith.
ERNEST A. GERARDI, JR. Mr. Gerardi is President, Chief Operating Officer
and a Director of the Company, and is President, Chief Executive Officer, and a
director of each of the Property Service Businesses. From 1985 until 1994, Mr.
Gerardi was a member of the Executive Committee of Charles E. Smith Management,
Inc., where he had overall responsibility for all day-to-day business operations
and long-range planning. From 1985 through 1993, he served as Executive Vice
President and Senior Executive Vice President of Charles E. Smith Management,
Inc. Prior to joining the Smith Companies in 1985, Mr. Gerardi was with Arthur
Andersen and Co., where he served as senior partner in charge of the firm's
accounting and financial practice for over 250 professionals in Washington, D.C.
During his 27 years with Arthur Andersen, he specialized in management
consultation and strategic planning. He is also a member of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the D.C. Institute of Certified
Public Accountants. Mr. Gerardi is 61 years old.
WESLEY D. MINAMI. Mr. Minami is Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company and Smith Realty Company, one of the Property Service
Businesses, and is responsible for the Operating Partnership's debt portfolio,
corporate financial planning, and its treasury, accounting, controls and
information systems departments. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Minami was
the Chief Financial Officer for Ascent Entertainment Company since 1995, and
previous to that had been the Treasurer of Comsat Corporation and the Senior
Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer for
Oxford Realty Services Corporation. Mr. Minami is 40 years old.
<PAGE>
ROBERT D. ZIMET. Mr. Zimet is Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of the Company and Smith Realty Company, one of the Property Service
Businesses. Mr. Zimet has been a member of the Executive Committee of Charles E.
Smith Management, Inc. for at least the last five years. He has been the General
Counsel and a Senior Vice President of Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. since
joining the Smith Companies in 1983, and he became a Group Senior Vice President
of Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. in 1991. Mr. Zimet is responsible for the
legal affairs of the Operating Partnership and the Smith Companies, as well as
supervision of the Human Resources and Office Services departments of Smith
Realty Company. Mr. Zimet is 58 years old.
ROGER L. WEEKS. Mr. Weeks is Senior Vice President-Residential of the
Company and Smith Realty Company, one of the Property Service Businesses. Since
1980, Mr. Weeks has been Senior Vice President and Department Head of the
Residential Management Department for which he had overall property management
and leasing responsibility for the entire multifamily residential management
portfolio. Mr. Weeks was also a member of the Executive Committee of Charles E.
Smith Management, Inc. until 1994. He joined the Smith Companies in 1967. Mr.
Weeks is a member of the Building Owners and Managers Association, former
Treasurer of the National Apartment Association and past President of the
Apartment and Office Building Association. Mr. Weeks is 55 years old.
MATTHEW B. McCORMICK. Mr. McCormick is the Senior Vice President-Retail of
the Company and Smith Realty Company, one of the Property Service Businesses.
Since 1988, Mr. McCormick has been the Senior Vice President and Department Head
of the Retail Group, where he is responsible for retail property management and
leasing, as well as outside retail brokerage services. Prior to joining the
Smith Companies in 1988, Mr. McCormick was a retail specialist with the
Washington, D.C. office of Coldwell Banker. Mr. McCormick is 36 years old.
ALFRED G. NEELY. Mr. Neely is Senior Vice President-Development of the
Company, responsible for the zoning, planning and development of all multifamily
buildings. Since joining Charles E. Smith Construction, Inc., in 1989 as a
Senior Vice President and now as a Group Senior Vice President, Mr. Neely has
been responsible for zoning, planning and development. Prior to joining the
Smith Companies, Mr. Neely was Executive Vice President and Managing General
Partner of the New Height Group, a real estate and development company in
Denver, Colorado. During his nine years with this company, Mr. Neely was
responsible for development and management of mixed-use properties. Mr. Neely is
51 years old.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
GENERAL
The 46 Properties consist of 44 Multifamily Properties and two Retail
Properties, as described in more detail below. Thirty of the Multifamily
Properties and both Retail Properties were acquired in connection with the
Formation Transactions, two additional Multifamily Properties were acquired in
1994, five additional Multifamily Properties were acquired and one additional
Multifamily Property was developed and delivered in 1995, four additional
Multifamily Properties were acquired in 1996 (one of which was later combined
with another Property for operational and
<PAGE>
statistical purposes), and three additional Multifamily Properties were acquired
in the first quarter of 1997. In addition, the Operating Partnership holds
minority limited partnership interests in two other multifamily apartment
properties in the Washington metropolitan area, acquired in the Formation
Transactions and increased in a subsequent transaction.
All of the Operating Partnership's properties are located in developed
areas that include other residential and retail properties. The number of
competitive residential properties in a particular area could have a material
effect on the Operating Partnership's ability to lease apartment units and on
the rents charged. In addition, other forms of single and multifamily
residential properties provide housing alternatives to tenants and potential
tenants of the Operating Partnership's residential properties. The Operating
Partnership's retail properties face similar competition with other retail
properties with respect to tenant leases. The Operating Partnership believes
that the properties are well located in their markets and are well constructed
and designed. In the opinion of management, the Operating Partnership's
properties are adequately covered by insurance.
MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES
The 44 Multifamily Properties are located in the Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area and contain a total of 17,028 garden, mid-rise, and high-rise
apartment units, ranging in size from 115 to 1,065 units. All of the Multifamily
Properties are 100% owned by the Operating Partnership, the Company, and their
subsidiaries. The Smith Companies developed and built 27 of the Multifamily
Properties owned by the Operating Partnership (not including the recently-
completed Westerly at Worldgate, which was developed by the Operating
Partnership but constructed by an affiliate of the Smith Companies). In 1996,
the average monthly rental revenue per unit was $883 and the average economic
occupancy was 97.0% for the Core Residential Portfolio (Multifamily Properties
acquired in the Formation Transaction or in other transactions prior to December
31, 1994.)
Each of the Multifamily Properties is established in its local market and
provides residents with numerous amenities and services, which may include
24-hour desk service, swimming pools, tennis courts, exercise rooms and/or
saunas, day care centers, party or meeting rooms, tenant newsletters, and
laundry facilities. Nearly all units are wired for cable television, and many
units also offer additional features, such as washer/dryer, microwave,
fireplace, and patio/balcony. The Operating Partnership maintains an ongoing
program of regular maintenance and capital improvements and renovations,
including roof replacement and exterior maintenance, kitchen and bath
renovations, balcony repairs, and replacements of various building systems.
The following table sets forth certain additional information relating to
the Multifamily Properties as of December 31, 1996 (in the following table,
occupancy is based upon economic occupancy, which measures occupancy beginning
on the rent commencement date; monthly revenue per unit is total property
revenue divided by the number of apartment units; and certain data may be
omitted for properties not operated by the Operating Partnership for the entire
year):
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
Residential Portfolio Statistics for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Average Monthly Average
Property Type / Property Year Apartment Sq. Ft. Revenue Economic
Property Name Location Built Units Per Unit Per Unit Occupancy
- -------------------------------- ---------------- --------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Core Residential Portfolio
High-Rise
Albemarle Washington, D.C. 1959 235 1,097 $1,126 99.3%
Calvert - Woodley Washington, D.C. 1954 136 1,001 1,046 99.8%
Cleveland House Washington, D.C. 1955 216 894 1,001 98.3%
Corcoran House Washington, D.C. 1961 138 464 757 99.5%
Courthouse Plaza Arlington, VA 1988/90 396 772 1,134 97.8%
Crystal House I Arlington, VA 1964 426 917 933 96.7%
Crystal House II Arlington, VA 1965 402 938 905 96.3%
Crystal Place Arlington, VA 1987 180 894 1,210 97.6%
Crystal Square Arlington, VA 1973/75 378 1,121 1,080 98.4%
Gateway Place Arlington, VA 1987 162 826 2,023 93.1%
Marbury Plaza Washington, D.C. 1966 672 997 621 95.3%
Skyline Towers Fairfax Co., VA 1970/72 940 1,221 950 97.1%
Statesman Washington, D.C. 1961 281 593 739 98.6%
2501 Porter Street Washington, D.C. 1988 202 760 1,356 96.7%
Water Park Towers Arlington, VA 1988/89 360 881 1,486 97.8%
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sub-Total / Average 5,124 956 1,018 97.3%
Mid-Rise
Berkeley Arlington, VA 1960 138 891 704 97.6%
Columbian Stratford Arlington, VA 1959 227 942 719 98.2%
Executive Central Arlington, VA 1960 230 903 749 98.8%
Executive North Arlington, VA 1959 215 892 748 97.6%
Executive South Arlington, VA 1961 266 842 727 98.1%
Windsor Towers Arlington, VA 1965 280 1,025 760 96.9%
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sub-Total / Average 1,356 920 737 97.9%
Garden
Bedford Village Fairfax Co., VA 1967 752 1,070 859 96.1%
Car Barn Washington, D.C. 1981/87 196 1,311 823 96.9%
Columbia Crossing Arlington, VA 1990/91 247 976 1,116 98.2%
Concord Village Arlington, VA 1968 531 1,025 762 93.9%
Fort Chaplin Washington, D.C. 1963/65 549 983 603 96.5%
The Manor Montgomery Co., MD 1969 435 999 729 95.6%
Newport Village Alexandria, VA 1969/71 937 1,115 862 98.3%
Orleans Village Fairfax Co., VA 1965/67 851 1,061 787 96.9%
Oxford Manor Washington, D.C. 1968 227 1,005 596 94.7%
Patriot Village Fairfax Co., VA 1973-77 1,065 1,162 851 96.7%
Potomac View Loudoun Co., VA 1978 192 965 708 97.8%
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sub-Total / Average 5,982 1,073 801 96.6%
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sub-Total / Average 12,462 1,008 883 97.0%
Residential Acquisition /
Development Portfolio
High-Rise
Suburban Tower
(acquired 1/95) Montgomery Co., MD 1960 172 677 762 97.4%
Connecticut Heights
(acquired 6/95) Washington, D.C. 1920s/74 519 536 761 95.9%
The Bennington
(acquired 9/95) Arlington, VA 1982 348 804 986 97.3%
Van Ness South
(acquired 7/96) Washington, D.C. 1970 625 956 N/A N/A
1841 Columbia Road
(acquired 8/96) Washington, D.C. 1923 115 634 N/A N/A
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sub-Total / Average 1,779 756 837 96.7%
Garden
Blvd. of Old Town /
Gov. Spotswood
(acquired 4/95,3/96) Alexandria, VA 1941 159 603 723 96.8%
Westerly at Worldgate
(opened 5/95) Fairfax Co., VA 1995 320 921 1,063 92.8%
Oakwood
(acquired 12/95) Vienna, VA 1980 218 968 1,001 93.9%
Charter Oak
(acquired 3/96) Reston, VA 1970 262 1,097 N/A N/A
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sub-Total / Average 959 927 966 93.9%
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Sub-Total / Average 2,738 816 889 95.5%
========= ========= ========= =========
All Residential Properties 15,200 974 884 96.9%
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the total number of apartment units in the
Core Residential Portfolio, the economic occupancy, and the average monthly
rental revenue per unit as of the end of 1996 and in each of the previous five
years:
MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Average Monthly
Year Number of Units Percent Occupied* Revenue Per Unit
- ---- --------------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1996 12,462 97.0% $883
1995 11,834 97.2% $862
1994 11,834 97.8% $845
1993 11,834 97.8% $818
1992 11,587 97.2% $802
1991 10,831 96.2% $768
</TABLE>
* Based on the economic occupancy of stabilized properties in the portfolio for
one year prior to the commencement of the specified year.
RETAIL PROPERTIES
The Operating Partnership's two Retail Properties, Skyline Mall and
Worldgate Centre, are enclosed malls containing a total of approximately 436,000
square feet of retail space. Both Retail Properties lease health club facilities
to entities controlled by Messrs. Smith and Kogod pursuant to leases which
expire on December 31, 2015.
WORLDGATE CENTRE. Worldgate Centre is a community retail center located in
Herndon, Virginia, at the intersection of two major Northern Virginia traffic
arteries, the Dulles Airport Access Highway and Centreville Road. Developed by
the Smith Companies in 1991, it is a part of a mixed-use development which
includes the 320-unit multifamily development project of the Operating
Partnership that was opened in the spring of 1995. In addition to this
immediate market, this Property is located in Fairfax County, the highest median
income county in the country. It contains the 108,670 square foot Worldgate
Athletic Club, a Loews Cinema, and a mix of approximately 40 other food service,
fashion and specialty retailers and various business and general service
tenants. Worldgate Centre has 230,926 square feet of leasable area and had an
average occupancy rate of 99.8% during 1996. Approximately 17.3% of the leases,
based on net rentable area, are scheduled to expire prior to the year 2001.
SKYLINE MALL. Skyline Mall is a two-level, enclosed community retail center
located on Route 7 in Northern Virginia, at the intersection of Fairfax County,
Arlington County, and the City of Alexandria, Virginia. Originally developed by
the Smith Companies in 1977, it is part of a mixed-use community which also
includes over two million square feet of office space and over 3,300 high-rise
condominium and apartment units (including Skyline Towers, a 940-unit
Multifamily Property owned by the Operating Partnership), all within walking
distance. The Property has 204,914 square feet of leasable area and had an
average occupancy rate of 95.1% in 1996. It contains the 79,920 square foot
Skyline Racquet and Health Club, an AMC Cinema, and approximately 40 other
stores, including restaurants, fashion and specialty retailers, and various
business and general services. Approximately 20.1% of the leases, based on net
rentable area, are scheduled to expire prior to the year 2001.
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth certain additional information relating to
the Retail Properties as of December 31, 1996 (figures include space leased to
two health clubs affiliated with Messrs. Smith and Kogod):
RETAIL PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Gross Average Average
Leasable Number Average Base Rent Gross Rent
Property Year Area of % Leased Per SF Per SF
Name Location Completed (SF) Stores 1996 Leased Leased
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Skyline Mall Fairfax Co., VA 1977 204,914 40 95.1% $11.40 $16.06
Worldgate
Centre Herndon, VA 1991 230,926 40 99.8% $19.57 $26.45
------- ---- ------ ------
435,840 97.6% $15.83 $21.69
</TABLE>
LAND
The Operating Partnership has executed a contract to purchase an unimproved
17.03 acre site in Springfield, Virginia for the construction thereon of a 630-
unit, multi-phase, low-rise and mid-rise multifamily apartment complex. The
Operating Partnership also has a contract and intends to acquire a 36-acre site
in Reston, Virginia for the construction thereon of an approximately 375-unit
multifamily apartment complex. The Operating Partnership may, from time-to-time,
acquire unimproved land for the purpose of future development.
PROPERTY MARKETS
The Operating Partnership believes that the demographic and economic trends
and conditions in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, the market where the
Properties are located, indicate a potential for continued high occupancy and
moderate rental rate growth in 1997.
All of the Operating Partnership's Properties are located in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, which traditionally has been, and which the
Operating Partnership believes will continue to be, among the strongest regions
in the United States for multifamily rental properties and one of the most
stable markets compared to many other markets which encounter significant
fluctuations over time. The region is the country's fifth largest employment
market with over 2.9 million jobs, and is projected to add 648,000 jobs over the
period 1993 to 2005, an average increase of over 50,000 jobs annually, according
to projections prepared by the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Economic
Analysis, and released in mid-1996. This is the third largest projected
employment increase of all U.S. cities as indicated on the following table:
<PAGE>
PROJECTED JOB GROWTH FOR MAJOR U.S. CITIES 1993 TO 2005
Metro Area (MSA) Job Increase Rank Projected Jobs Added
Chicago, IL 1. 763,000
Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 2. 685,000
WASHINGTON, DC-MD-VA 3. 648,000
Boston, MA 4. 600,000
Atlanta, GA 5. 598,000
Orange County, CA 6. 525,000
Houston, TX 7. 515,000
Dallas, TX 8. 486,000
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 9. 469,000
San Diego, CA 10. 429,000
_________________________
Source: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, May, 1996
According to the same Department of Commerce projections, the Washington
D.C. metro area is also projected to have the third largest population increase
of all U.S. cities as shown in the following table:
PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH FOR MAJOR U.S. CITIES 1993 TO 2005
Population Projected Total
Metro Area (MSA) Increase Rank (1) Population Increase
Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 1. 928,000
Los Angeles, Long Beach, CA 2. 927,000
WASHINGTON, D.C.-MD-VA 3. 744,000
Atlanta, GA 4. 732,000
Chicago, IL 5. 716,000
Houston, TX 6. 673,000
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 7. 617,000
San Diego, CA 8. 595,000
Orange County, CA 9. 531,000
Boston, MA, NH 10. 518,000
_________________________
(1) Reflects rank increase in population by number of people
Source: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, May 1996
A significant factor contributing to the employment and population
increases projected for the Washington D.C. metropolitan area is the continuing
growth of the technology sector, particularly the information technology
segment. The Washington area is estimated to be similar in number of technology
jobs (256,000) to San Jose/Silicon Valley in California (283,000) and
Boston/Route 128 in Massachusetts (311,500), according to a study conducted by
The Center for Regional Analysis, George Mason University, using 1992 data. This
study also concluded that the technology segment in the Washington D.C. area is
"...most likely, the fastest growing" of the three regions.
<PAGE>
The continuing strength of the technology sector has been a key factor
enabling the region to maintain economic growth notwithstanding Federal
Government downsizing over the past three years. Over the three-year period 1994
through and including 1996, 131,900 new wage and salary jobs were added in the
region, which more than offset 44,100 Federal government jobs "downsized" over
the same period, resulting in a net job increase of 87,800 jobs over the period,
according to data derived by the governments of the District of Columbia,
Maryland and Virginia from original data compiled by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Economic growth in the Washington metro area in 1996 was adversely
affected by the 1996 Federal budget stalemate and related government shutdowns,
however 27,400 new jobs were added during the year, which offset the loss of
14,800 Federal government jobs during this period, resulting in a net job
increase of 12,600. In recent years employment growth has been considerably
stronger in the Northern Virginia segment of the metropolitan area (33,600 net
increase in 1996), which is the sector where the majority of the Operating
Partnership's properties are located (76% of units), and the Operating
Partnership believes that this trend will continue due to the concentration of
technology firms in Northern Virginia.
Demand for multi-family rental apartments continues to be strong in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area as evidenced by high occupancy rates. Annual
surveys of approximately 80% of comparable investment grade apartment properties
conducted by The REIS Reports, Inc. have indicated that the overall market-wide
occupancy rates were 96.4% in January 1997, 96.5% in the first quarter of 1996,
and 95.9% in the first quarter of 1995. The average occupancy rate of the
Operating Partnership's Core Residential Portfolio was 97.0% in 1996, which is
higher than the overall market average (which was determined on a physical
occupancy basis that typically yields a slightly higher occupancy percentage
than the economic basis on which the Operating Partnership's occupancy
percentage is calculated). The REIS Reports, Inc. forecast in March 1996 that
the average annual apartment occupancy in the Washington metropolitan area in
the 1997 - 2001 period will be between 95.7% and 96.9%, and annual rental rate
increases will average between 3.8% and 4.6%, in both cases above its forecast
for the U.S. averages.
The supply of multifamily properties has been increasing moderately in the
Washington metropolitan area over the past several years and is likely to
continue to do so based on multifamily permits data compiled by the U.S. Census
Bureau. These data show that the numbers of multifamily permits issued in the
area were 5,202 in 1994, 5,952 in 1995 and 7,786 in 1996, and these data include
both for-sale condominium and rental apartment properties. These levels remain
well below the peak of over 13,000 in 1987. Most of the new supply of rental
apartments is occurring in the outer suburban areas and does not compete
directly with the Operating Partnership's properties, which are predominantly in
the vicinity of and within Interstate Highway 495, the Capital Beltway.
Overall, the Operating Partnership believes that the anticipated increases
in employment and population projected for the Washington D.C. area, together
with moderate increases in supply of new rental units in locations competitive
with the Operating Partnership's properties, will result in the Operating
Partnership's multifamily rental submarkets remaining in a strong occupancy
position for at least the next 18 - 24 months. As a result, the Operating
Partnership believes that these conditions will provide an opportunity to
improve apartment rent levels and investment values, and will also allow new
development opportunities.
<PAGE>
MORTGAGE FINANCING
Thirty-three of the 43 Properties owned at December 31, 1996 were subject
to Mortgage Loans aggregating approximately $416,808,000 as of December 31,
1996. The Mortgage Loans are collateralized by nonrecourse first lien mortgages
or deeds of trust on Properties organized into four pools ("Mortgage Pool One,"
"Mortgage Pool Two," "Mortgage Pool Three," and "Mortgage Pool Four", as shown
in the chart below) and three individual loans (the "Acquisition Mortgages"),
and bear interest at a weighted average interest rate of 8.01% at December 31,
1996. The Properties collateralizing each Mortgage Loan, the outstanding
principal balances as of December 31, 1996, the applicable interest rates, and
the maturity dates for each Mortgage Loan are set forth in the chart below.
Each of the related loan agreements for Mortgage Pool One and Mortgage Pool
Two requires the payment of interest only and contains cross-collateral and
cross-default provisions among the separate financing partnership borrowers in
each pool. Prepayment of these loans would be subject to a yield maintenance
premium. The loan secured by Mortgage Pool Three is interest only through June
30, 1999, at which time amortization begins using a 25-year amortization
schedule with a balloon payment at maturity. In addition, this loan may not be
prepaid until May 1, 1999, at which time it would be subject to a yield
maintenance premium. In January, 1996 this financing was modified to extend the
term for an additional five years to June 30, 2009, and was cross-collateralized
with a new $83 million permanent line of credit from the same lender, as
described below. Certain predecessor partners executed guarantees for $42
million of the mortgage loans secured by Mortgage Pool Three. The loan secured
by Mortgage Pool Four was refinanced in September 1996 and was obtained jointly
with a ground lessor, with a portion of the principal allocated to each of them.
The ground lessor has been allocated $9.9 million of the refinanced loan (of the
total of $41.0 million outstanding as of December 31, 1996), for which the
Operating Partnership is contingently liable. The loan requires the payment of
interest only through August 2004, at which time amortization begins using a 30-
year amortization schedule with a balloon payment due in August 2009. The
Operating Partnership remits full debt service to the lender and reduces its
ground rent payment by the corresponding amount of debt service relating to the
principal assigned to the ground lessor.
The Acquisition Mortgages relate to the 1995 and 1996 acquisitions of three
Properties by the Operating Partnership. The Acquisition Mortgage for
Connecticut Heights was assumed in connection with the purchase of this Property
on June 30, 1995. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 1996, was
$17,245,000 (it has subsequently been significantly reduced) and it matures on
June 30, 1997. The loan amortizes through maturity and has a variable interest
rate equal to a blended LIBOR rate plus 1.70% (7.2% as of December 31, 1996).
The Acquisition Mortgage for the Bennington was assumed in connection with the
purchase of this Property on September 29, 1995. The outstanding balance as of
December 31, 1996, was $12,870,000, and it matures on October 31, 2020. The loan
amortizes through maturity and carries a fixed interest rate of 7.50%. The
Acquisition Mortgage for 1841 Columbia Road was assumed in connection with the
purchase of this Property on August 1, 1996. The outstanding balance as of
December 31, 1996, was $3,244,000, at a fixed interest rate of 9.00% per annum
and a maturity date of August 1, 1999.
<PAGE>
In addition to the mortgage debt shown on the chart below, a construction
loan is secured by the Westerly, a property developed by the Operating
Partnership. This interest-only loan had an outstanding balance of $17,686,000
on December 31, 1996, carried a blended floating interest rate of 7.32% at year
end, and was to have matured on June 1, 1997; it has subsequently been repaid in
full.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
12/31/96
Mortgage Pool/ Outstanding Interest Maturity
Collateral Location Principal Rate Date
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mortgage Pool One $110,140,000 8.01% June 30, 1999
- -----------------
Columbian Stratford Arlington, Virginia
Corcoran House Washington, D.C.
Crystal House I Arlington, Virginia
Crystal House II Arlington, Virginia
Executive North Arlington, Virginia
Marbury Plaza Washington, D.C.
Oxford Manor Washington, D.C.
Skyline Towers Fairfax County, Virginia
Statesman Washington, D.C.
Water Park Towers Arlington, Virginia
Windsor Towers Arlington, Virginia
Mortgage Pool Two $125,214,000 8.27% June 30, 2001
- -----------------
Bedford Village Fairfax County, Virginia
Car Barn Washington, D.C.
Concord Village Arlington, Virginia
Crystal Place Arlington, Virginia
Crystal Square Arlington, Virginia
Executive Central Arlington, Virginia
Executive South Arlington, Virginia
Fort Chaplin Washington, D.C.
Newport III (1) Alexandria, Virginia
Orleans Village Fairfax County, Virginia
Mortgage Pool Three $117,000,000 7.99% June 30, 2009 (2)
- -------------------
Berkeley Arlington, Virginia
Calvert Woodley Washington, D.C.
Cleveland House Washington, D.C.
Columbia Crossing Arlington, Virginia
Courthouse Plaza Arlington, Virginia
Gateway Place Arlington, Virginia
Newport I/II (1) Alexandria, Virginia
Skyline Mall Fairfax County, Virginia
2501 Porter Street Washington, D.C.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
12/31/96
Mortgage Pool/ Outstanding Interest Maturity
Collateral Location Principal Rate Date
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mortgage Pool Four $31,095,000 8.24% August 1, 2009(3)
- ------------------
Patriot Village Fairfax County, Virginia
Acquisition Mortgages
- ---------------------
Connecticut Heights Washington, D.C. $17,245,000 Variable(4) June 30, 1997
The Bennington Arlington, Virginia $12,870,000 7.5% October 31, 2020
1841 Columbia Road Washington, D.C. $3,244,000 9.00% August 1, 1999
---------- --------
$416,808,000 8.01%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1) Operated as a single property, but divided for collateralization purposes.
(2) Twenty-five year amortization begins June 30, 1999. Also, reflects a
five year extension agreed to in January 1996.
(3) Thirty-year amortization begins in August 2004.
(4) Interest rate is based on LIBOR plus 1.70%.
LINES OF CREDIT
The Operating Partnership has a $100,000,000 revolving line of credit with
PNC Bank, NationsBank, and First Bank, of which $82,050,000 was outstanding at
December 31, 1996. Amounts outstanding bear interest at a selected LIBOR rate
plus 1.625% (7.155% at December 31, 1996). The Operating Partnership pays a fee
of .125% on any unused portions of the line of credit plus the costs of setting
up the credit facility. The facility expires on June 30, 1997, with two one-year
extension options thereafter on the same terms. Borrowings under this line of
credit are collateralized by the Albemarle, Worldgate Centre, Manor, Potomac
View, Suburban Tower, Boulevard of Old Town/Governor Spotswood, and Van Ness
South apartments properties. This line of credit was repaid in the amount of
$54.4 million in the first quarter of 1997. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" below.
In January, 1996, the Operating Partnership secured a new $83 million
credit facility from Northwestern Mutual Life to be used for property
acquisitions. It expires in June 2004 and for the first two years provides for
an interest rate that is fixed at the time of each acquisition at a spread of
1.50% over the rate of 10-year Treasury Bills. Any properties acquired in this
fashion will secure the facility, and it is cross-collateralized with Mortgage
Pool Three. In January 1996, the Operating Partnership drew $16,000,000 under
this credit facility (and reduced by a like amount the outstanding balance under
its other line of credit) and collateralized it with the Oakwood property; this
line component bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.09%. In March, 1996, the
Operating Partnership
<PAGE>
drew $14,000,000 under this credit facility and collateralized it with the
Charter Oaks property; this line component bears interest at a fixed rate of
7.48%. The blended rate for the two components is 7.2%. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" below.
Subsequent to the Company's stock offering in the first quarter of 1997 and
the related debt repayment, the Operating Partnership had approximately $126
million of unused borrowing capacity available on lines of credit.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The Operating Partnership previously reported on a suit filed against Smith
Realty Company, alleging sexual harassment and employment discrimination based
on sexual preference pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and
the Operating Partnership's motion for summary judgment, which was granted in
full on June 7, 1996, resulting in a dismissal of all claims. Although the
plaintiff has appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit for a review of the judgment, and such request is not expected to be
considered until early 1997, the Registrant reaffirms its belief that an adverse
outcome in the remaining litigation would not have a material adverse impact on
the Registrant's financial condition or results of operations, and, accordingly,
the Operating Partnership will no longer report on these proceedings in its
filings with the Commission.
The Operating Partnership has previously reported on two lawsuits brought
in 1994 by Alder Branch Realty Limited Partnership, a limited partner in Plaza
Associates Limited Partnership ("Plaza") and Tower Associates Limited
Partnership ("Tower"), whose multifamily properties are currently being managed
by Smith Realty Company ("SRC"), one of the Operating Partnership's Property
Services Businesses, against Robert H. Smith, as a general partner of Plaza and
Tower, its managing agent, Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. ("CES"), whose
residential management business was purchased by the Registrant in the Formation
Transactions, and other present or former officers of CES. These suits alleged
breaches of fiduciary duties by the general partners and the payment of unfair
and excessive management fees. Because the Registrant did not believe that the
outcome of the suits would jeopardize the continued management of Plaza's and
Tower's multifamily properties by SRC or have a material impact on other
properties which are managed by SRC but which did not participate in the
Formation Transactions, or that an adverse outcome in such litigation would have
a material adverse effect on the Registrant's financial condition or results of
operations, the Registrant previously stated that it would no longer report on
these proceedings in its filings with the Commission. It also previously
reported a lawsuit filed on May 31, 1996, by the same plaintiff against the
Registrant and its general partner, Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.,
as well as two of the three general partners of Tower, alleging the payment of
unfair and excessive management fees and breaches of fiduciary duties by the
named general partners of Tower. The latter suit sought the restitution of fees
paid to SRC by Tower, a rescission of the management agreement, and compensatory
and punitive damages in unspecified amounts. All three of these lawsuits have
been withdrawn with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement entered into on
November 8, 1996 which did not require any contribution by the Operating
Partnership or its subsidiaries, and, accordingly, the Operating Partnership
will no longer report on these proceedings in its filing with the Commission.
<PAGE>
Other than as set forth above, neither the Operating Partnership nor the
Property Service Businesses is presently subject to any material litigation nor,
to the Operating Partnership's knowledge, is any material litigation threatened
against the Operating Partnership or the Property Service Businesses other than
routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business expected to be
covered by liability insurance, which will not have a material adverse effect on
the Operating Partnership's financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS.
There is no established public trading market for the Units of the
Operating Partnership. The Company's shares of Common Stock, for which the Units
may, from time-to-time be redeemed, have been listed on the New York Stock
Exchange ("NYSE") since June 24, 1994, trading under the symbol "SRW." Prior to
that date, the Company's shares of Common Stock were not publicly traded.
The Operating Partnership has, on five occasions since its commencement of
operations and through December 31, 1996 (as set forth in the chart below),
issued Units for the purpose of acquiring all or a part of an ownership interest
in a real estate property. The recipients of these Units have been the partners
of partnerships owning such property, who have swapped their ownership interest
for Units, cash, the assumption of debt, or some combination thereof. These
Units are offered on a private placement basis, and the offerings are completed
without an underwriter or the payment of sales commissions or discounts. The
Operating Partnership believes that such offerings and sales were exempt from
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act")
by virtue of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the provisions of Rule 506
of Regulation D promulgated thereunder, the conclusion of the Operating
Partnership, after diligent investigation, that all purchasers were "accredited
investors" as defined in Rule 501 and met the other requirements of Registration
D, the delivery to each prospective purchaser of appropriate written materials,
and the execution by each purchaser of a qualifying subscription agreement.
UNREGISTERED UNIT ISSUANCES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Issue Date # of Units Issued Consideration Implied Unit Value Redeemable
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1/31/95 251,172 interest in Suburban $6,404,886 after one year
Towers Apartments ($25.50/Unit*)
6/30/95 309,306 interest in Connecticut $7,384,681 after one year
Heights Apartments ($23.88/Unit)
11/1/95 77,125 10% interest in $1,765,000 after two years
Brandywine Apartments ($22.88/Unit)
3/15/96 22,059 interest in Charter Oak $551,475 after one year
Apartments ($25.00/Unit*)
8/1/96 79,600 interest in 1841 $1,890,500 after two years
Columbia Road ($23.75/Unit)
Apartments
</TABLE>
- ----------------
*Negotiated Value
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the distributions made by the Operating
Partnership with respect to each such period:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period Distributions Per Unit
------ ----------------------
<S> <C>
January 1, 1995, to March 31, 1995 $ 0.475
April 1, 1995, to June 30, 1995 $ 0.475
July 1, 1995, to September 30, 1995 $ 0.490
October 1, 1995, to December 31, 1995 $ 0.490
January 1, 1996, to March 31, 1996 $ 0.490
April 1, 1996, to June 30, 1996 $ 0.490
July 1, 1996, to September 30, 1996 $ 0.505
October 1, 1996, to December 31, 1996 $ 0.505
</TABLE>
On March 20, 1997, the Company had approximately 749 Unitholders of record.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating information
on a historical basis for the Company and the Predecessor (as hereinafter
defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The following
information should be read in conjunction with all of the financial statements
and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The historical operating
data for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993 and 1992 have been
derived from the financial statements of the Company and the Predecessor audited
by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent accountants.
<PAGE>
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. and CES Group
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. CES Group
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands, ----------------------- June 30, 1994 to January 1, 1994 -----------------------
Except Per Unit Data) 1996 1995 December 31, 1994 to June 29, 1994 1993 1992
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA
Rental properties
Revenues(1) $ 166,283 $ 144,909 $ 67,391 $ 63,496 $ 124,187 $122,815
Expenses 93,710 81,885 38,197 36,039 70,681 69,766
Equity in income of Property Service
Businesses 7,846 6,868 3,785 2,798 7,098 3,482
Corporate general & administrative
expenses 3,025 2,842 1,171 1,550 3,137 3,014
Interest income 1,029 1,424 825 970 1,940 1,711
Interest expense 43,606 37,421 17,392 24,798 46,815 46,281
Income (loss) before extraordinary
items 34,817 31,053 15,241 (10,700) 12,592 8,947
Net income (loss) $ 34,817 $ 31,053 $ 15,241 $(25,895) $ 14,691 $ 8,947
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Net income per unit(2) $ 1.59 $ 1.44 $ 0.72
OTHER DATA
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS(3)
Net income $ 34,817 $ 31,053 $ 15,241
Plus
Depreciation and amortization
of rental property 17,931 16,258 7,738
------------------------------------
Funds from Operations $ 52,748 $ 47,311 $ 22,979
====================================
Net cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities $ 50,981 $ 53,858 $ 19,877
Investing activities (71,447) (67,675) (26,666)
Financing activities 14,886 4,945 25,139
Cash distributions per unit $ 1.975 $ 1.915 $ 0.48
Average residential occupancy rate(4) 97.0% 97.2% 97.8% 97.8% 97.2%
Average monthly revenue per
apartment unit(5) $ 883 $ 862 $ 845 $ 818 $ 802
Number of apartment units - core
portfolio(4)(5) 12,462 11,834 11,834 11,834 11,587
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Rental properties, net(6) $ 470,093 $414,490 $ 315,213 $ 295,544 $ 303,545
Total assets 522,211 469,322 391,189 357,861 366,430
Mortgage loans 416,808 413,973 383,821 573,867 549,060
Other Limited Partners' Interest,
at redemption value(7) 351,873 288,663 310,247 - -
Partner's equity
General Partner's General and Limited
Partnership interest(6)(7) (389,252) (320,286) (347,767) (216,006) (182,630)
</TABLE>
24
<PAGE>
FOOTNOTES TO SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
1. Includes revenues from the two retail properties of $10,176 in 1996,
$10,418 in 1995, $8,990 in 1994, $8,048 in 1993 and $8,827 in 1992.
2. Per unit amounts are based on weighted average units outstanding of
21,907,632 in 1996, 21,602,995 in 1995, and 21,229,796 in 1994.
3. Funds from Operations (FFO) is defined under the revised definition
adopted by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(NAREIT) as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles) excluding gains (or losses) from debt
restructuring, plus depreciation/amortization of assets unique to the
real estate industry. Depreciation/amortization of assets not unique to
the industry, such as amortization of deferred financing costs and non-
real estate assets, is not added back. FFO does not represent cash flow
from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (which, unlike Funds from Operations, generally
reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the
determination of net income) and should not be considered an alternative
to net income as an indication of the Operating Partnership's
performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make
distributions. The Operating Partnership considers FFO a meaningful,
additional measure of operating performance because it primarily
excludes the assumption that the value of real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as
a performance measure. Comparison of the Operating Partnership's
presentation of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled
measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to
possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by
such REITs.
4. Average occupancy is defined as gross potential rent for the core
portfolio less vacancy allowance divided by gross potential rent for the
period, expressed as percentage.
5. Average monthly revenue per apartment unit consists of total residential
property revenue for the core portfolio divided by the respective number
of apartment units divided by the number of months in the period.
6. At the formation of the Operating Partnership, all rental properties
were recorded at predecessor partners' historical cost basis which is
significantly less than current value and, therefore, results in
dilution of partners' book value. Partner's equity of $(389,252),
$(320,286) and $(347,767) as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively, is net of $(244,208) contribution by predecessor partners
of assets at historical cost, net of liabilities.
7. Limited partnership units of the Other Limited Partners may be redeemed
at the unitholder's discretion. Consequently, the Other Limited
Partners' Interest, measured at redemption value, is not included in
partner's equity. Partner's equity has been adjusted to reflect the
redemption value of Other Limited Partners' Interest. (See footnote 14
to the financial statements.)
25
<PAGE>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
BACKGROUND
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the "Selected
Financial Data," and the financial statements and notes thereto included
elsewhere in this annual report. The results of operations presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and discussed below for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the period from June 30, 1994 to December
31, 1994 represent the results of operations of Charles E. Smith Residential
Realty L.P. (the "Operating Partnership"). The results presented in the
financial statements for the CES Group (the "Predecessor") cover the period from
January 1, 1994 to June 29, 1994.
The following discussion compares historical results of operations for the
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and compares historical results for the
years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994. In analyzing the results for 1994,
management has summarized the Operating Partnership's and CES Group's results of
operations for 1994.
THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
The Operating Partnership is engaged primarily in the acquisition,
development, management and operation of multifamily properties in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Together with its subsidiaries, the
Operating Partnership is a fully integrated real estate organization with in-
house acquisition, development, financing, marketing, leasing and property
management expertise.
On June 30, 1994, Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc. (the "Company")
made a $201.4 million capital contribution to the Operating Partnership for a 1%
general partnership interest and a 41.7% limited partnership interest in the
Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership.
As of December 31, 1996, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries,
owned 41 multifamily properties and two retail properties which are located in
the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The multifamily properties consist of
the following:
26
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
-------------------
Type Properties Units
-------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Core Portfolio
High-rise 15 5,124
Mid-rise 6 1,356
Garden/Townhomes 11 5,982
-- ------
32 12,462
-- ------
Acquisitions & Development
High-rise 5 1,779
Garden/Townhomes 4 959
-- ------
9 2,738
-- ------
41 15,200
== ======
</TABLE>
The Operating Partnership's two free standing retail properties are enclosed
malls containing a total of approximately 436,000 square feet of retail space.
The Operating Partnership, through the Property Service Businesses, provides
a range of services to the properties on essentially a cost basis and to third-
party clients and affiliated partnerships on a fee basis as follows:
. Multifamily and Retail Property Management Services provides property
management and leasing services to multifamily and retail properties.
. Interior Construction and Renovation Services provides construction and
project management services for capital improvement and tenant
renovation projects of office, retail and residential properties.
. Engineering and Technical Services provides on-site building systems
operations and maintenance; engineering and technical consulting;
automated environmental monitoring and controls; preventive
maintenance; management of building environmental systems; and repair
and replacement of mechanical/electrical systems. This business also
provides facilities management services for outside parties including
condominium associations, banks, universities, and government agencies.
. Financing Services provides negotiation, administration and execution
of debt refinancing including sourcing funding alternatives, soliciting
prospective lenders, monitoring, analyzing and negotiating changes in
loan status and/or structure, and satisfying reporting requirements of
lenders.
27
<PAGE>
RENTAL PROPERTIES
Revenue, expenses and income from the multifamily and retail properties were
as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CES Residential Realty L.P. CES Group
----------------------------------------------- -------------
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------
6/30/94 to 1/1/94 to
1996 1995 12/31/94 6/29/94
------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Multifamily Properties - Core(1)
Revenues $ 132,111 $ 127,745 $ 62,269 $ 59,628
Expenses (61,248) (58,566) (29,037) (26,867)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before depreciation $ 70,863 $ 69,179 $ 33,232 $ 32,761
========= ========= ========= =========
Multifamily Properties -
Acquisitions & Development
Revenues $ 23,996 $ 6,746 $ - $ -
Expenses (10,964) (3,614) - -
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before depreciation $ 13,032 $ 3,132 $ - $ -
========= ========= ========= =========
Retail Properties
Revenues $ 10,176 $ 10,418 $ 5,122 $ 3,868
Expenses (3,567) (3,447) (1,422) (1,546)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before depreciation $ 6,609 $ 6,971 $ 3,700 $ 2,322
========= ========= ========= =========
Total Rental Properties
Revenues $ 166,283 $ 144,909 $ 67,391 $ 63,496
Expenses (75,779) (65,627) (30,459) (28,413)
Depreciation and amortization (17,931) (16,258) (7,738) (7,626)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income from Rental Properties $ 72,573 $ 63,024 $ 29,194 $ 27,457
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
(1) "Core" represents properties owned as of December 31, 1994.
OCCUPANCY RATES
Average occupancy of the Operating Partnership's core multifamily
properties compares favorably with the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area
market-wide average occupancy, based on annual surveys of approximately 80% of
comparable investment grade apartment properties conducted by The REIS Reports,
Inc. as follows:
28
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Occupancy Percent
---------------------------------------------------
Operating Partnership Washington, DC Market
--------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1996 97.0%(1) 96.4%
1995 97.2%(2) 95.8%
1994 97.8%(2) 95.2%
</TABLE>
(1) Includes 32 properties containing 12,462 apartment units
(2) Includes 30 properties containing 11,834 apartment units
Market-wide data from the surveys conducted by The REIS Reports, Inc. are
determined on a physical occupancy basis, whereas the Operating Partnership's
occupancy data is calculated on an economic basis. Physical occupancy data
commonly yields a slightly higher percentage than economic occupancy because
apartment units are considered physically rented when a rental applicant's
deposit is received, a point in time generally prior to the actual rent
commencement date used in computing economic occupancy.
RENTAL REVENUE
Average revenue per apartment unit for the Operating Partnership's core
multifamily properties increased approximately 3.4% in 1996 as compared with
1995, and 2.1% in 1995 (based on properties owned as of June 30, 1994) as
compared with 1994.
A schedule of portfolio statistics follows:
29
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
RESIDENTIAL PORTFOLIO STATISTICS
For the Year Ended December 31, 1996
Number of Average Monthly Average
Property Apartment Sq. Ft. Revenue Economic
Property Name Type Units Per Unit Per Unit Occupancy
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Core Residential Portfolio
Virginia
Bedford Village Garden 752 1,070 $ 859 96.1%
Berkeley Mid-Rise 138 891 704 97.6%
Columbia Crossing Garden 247 976 1,116 98.2%
Columbian Stratford Mid-Rise 227 942 719 98.2%
Concord Village Garden 531 1,025 762 93.9%
Courthouse Plaza High-Rise 396 772 1,134 97.8%
Crystal House I High-Rise 426 917 933 96.7%
Crystal House II High-Rise 402 938 905 96.3%
Crystal Place High-Rise 180 894 1,210 97.6%
Crystal Square High-Rise 378 1,121 1,080 98.4%
Executive Central Mid-Rise 230 903 749 98.8%
Executive North Mid-Rise 215 892 748 97.6%
Executive South Mid-Rise 266 842 727 98.1%
Gateway Place High-Rise 162 826 2,023 93.1%
Newport Village Garden 937 1,115 862 98.3%
Orleans Village Garden 851 1,061 787 96.9%
Patriot Village Garden 1,065 1,162 851 96.7%
Potomac View Garden 192 965 708 97.8%
Skyline Towers High-Rise 940 1,221 950 97.1%
Water Park Towers High-Rise 360 881 1,486 97.8%
Windsor Towers Mid-Rise 280 1,025 760 96.9%
------ ----- ----- -----
Subtotal/Average 9,175 1,032 920 97.1%
Washington, D.C.
Albemarle High-Rise 235 1,097 1,126 99.3%
Calvert-Woodley High-Rise 136 1,001 1,046 99.8%
Car Barn Garden 196 1,311 823 96.9%
Cleveland House High-Rise 216 894 1,001 98.3%
Corcoran House High-Rise 138 464 757 99.5%
Fort Chaplin Garden 549 983 603 96.5%
Marbury Plaza High-Rise 672 997 621 95.3%
Oxford Manor Garden 227 1,005 596 94.7%
Statesman High-Rise 281 593 739 98.6%
2501 Porter Street High-Rise 202 760 1,356 96.7%
------ ----- ----- -----
Subtotal/Average 2,852 935 790 97.2%
Maryland
The Manor Garden 435 999 729 95.6%
------ ----- ----- -----
Subtotal/Average 12,462 1,008 883 97.0%
------ ----- ----- -----
Residential Acquisition/Development Portfolio
Suburban Tower (acquired 1/95) High-Rise 172 677 762 97.4%
Boulevard of Old Town /
Governor Spotswood Garden 159 603 723 96.8%
(acquired 4/95,3/96)
Connecticut Heights (acquired 6/95) High-Rise 519 536 761 95.9%
The Bennington (acquired 9/95) High-Rise 348 804 986 97.3%
Oakwood (acquired 12/95) Garden 218 968 1,001 93.9%
Westerly at Worldgate (opened 5/95) Garden 320 921 1,063 92.8%
Charter Oak (acquired 3/96) Garden 262 1,097 N/A N/A
Van Ness South (acquired 7/96) High-Rise 625 956 N/A N/A
1841 Columbia Road (acquired 8/96) High-Rise 115 634 N/A N/A
------ ----- ----- -----
Subtotal/Average 2,738 816 889 95.5%
------ ----- ----- -----
All Residential Properties 15,200 974 $ 884 96.9%
====== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
30
<PAGE>
PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES
Revenues, expenses and income from the various Property Service Businesses
were as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CES Residential Realty L.P. CES Group
------------------------------------------------ ----------------
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------- 6/30/94 to 1/1/94 to
1996 1995 12/31/94 6/29/94
------------ ----------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Multifamily and Retail Property
Management Services
Revenues $ 11,465 $ 9,672 $ 5,238 $ 2,095
Expenses (9,169) (7,664) (4,149) (1,004)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before
depreciation/amortization $ 2,296 $ 2,008 $ 1,089 $ 1,091
========= ========= ========= =========
Interior Construction and Renovation
Services
Net fee revenues $ 5,650 $ 5,901 $ 2,712 $ 1,987
Expenses (4,670) (4,795) (1,990) (1,987)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before
depreciation/amortization $ 980 $ 1,106 $ 722 $ -
========= ========= ========= =========
Engineering and Technical Services
(including reimbursed costs)
Revenues $ 42,179 $ 40,186 $ 18,667 $ 18,341
Expenses (38,516) (36,701) (17,310) (15,919)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before
depreciation/amortization $ 3,663 $ 3,485 $ 1,357 $ 2,422
========= ========= ========= =========
Financing Services
Revenues $ 2,640 $ 3,018 $ 1,668 $ 441
Expenses (687) (1,439) (497) (393)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before
depreciation/amortization $ 1,953 $ 1,579 $ 1,171 $ 48
========= ========= ========= =========
Total Property Service Businesses
Revenues $ 61,934 $ 58,777 $ 28,285 $ 22,864
Expenses (53,042) (50,599) (23,946) (19,303)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before
depreciation/amortization 8,892 8,178 4,339 3,561
Depreciation/amortization (1,046) (1,310) (554) (763)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income from Property
Service Businesses $ 7,846 $ 6,868 $ 3,785 $ 2,798
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
Multifamily and Retail Property Management Services provide management
services to the Operating Partnership at cost plus 10% in accordance with the
management agreement. In 1996, management services were provided to 18 third-
party owned multifamily properties which own approximately 6,400 apartment units
and to three retail properties which own approximately 293,000 square feet of
retail space. Of the 21 management agreements, 14 are with affiliated
partnerships and seven are with unaffiliated property owners. One management
agreement was terminated by the Operating Partnership in January, 1997. The
management agreements with affiliated partnerships are for initial terms of
three years or more and the multifamily management agreements with unaffiliated
owners generally have one-year terms. The average term for which the Operating
Partnership and its predecessors have managed these properties is 20 years.
Interior Construction and Renovation Services provided oversight to
approximately $58 million of gross construction activity in 1996 compared to
approximately $45 million in 1995, and approximately $40 million in 1994.
Services are provided to the Operating Partnership at cost (including overhead)
and at cost plus a fee to affiliated partnerships and third parties.
Engineering and Technical Services provides on-site building systems
operations, maintenance and inspection to affiliated partnerships at cost,
including overhead, and to third parties at cost, including overhead, plus a
fee. Services were provided to approximately 28 million square feet of
facilities in 1996 and 1995, and to approximately 25 million square feet in
1994.
Financing Services performed $242 million of refinancings in 1996 compared to
$261 million in 1995, and $168 million in 1994.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
COMPARISON TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
SUMMARY. Net income increased 12.1%, or $3.8 million, from $31.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 1995 to $34.8 million for the year ended December
31, 1996. Funds from Operations ("FFO") increased $5.4 million, or 11.5% during
the same period. The increase in both net income and FFO is due to increases in
income from the rental properties, primarily the multifamily acquisition and
development properties, as well as increased income from the Property Service
Businesses. These increases were partially offset by an increase in interest
expense related to multifamily acquisitions and development.
RENTAL PROPERTIES. Revenue from rental properties increased $21.4 million, or
14.7%, from $144.9 million for 1995 to $166.3 million for 1996. The nine
multifamily acquisition and development properties, consisting of 2,738
apartment units (note that two properties purchased in 1994 totaling 627
apartment units were transferred into the core portfolio on January 1 , 1996),
contributed $17.3 million, or 80.7% of the rental revenue increase. The core
portfolio contributed
32
<PAGE>
an increase of $4.4 million, or 3.4%, over 1995 offset by a $0.2 million
decrease in revenue from the retail properties.
Average monthly revenue per apartment unit of the core portfolio increased
from $854 in 1995 to $883 per month during 1996. Average economic occupancy
decreased slightly to 97.0% in 1996 from 97.2% in 1995. The decrease in
occupancy was not unexpected given the aggressive efforts initiated by
management to increase rents as well as the implementation during the third
quarter of 1996 of several revenue-enhancing initiatives, including a premium
for month-to-month leases and the charging of a non-refundable move-in fee in
lieu of security deposits. The Operating Partnership also continues to expand
and aggressively market its furnished apartment program. As a result, revenues
on this product increased $0.3 million, or 12.7%, over the prior year period.
Retail revenues decreased by $0.2 million, or 2.3%, during the year ended
December 31, 1996 compared to the prior year due to lower base and percentage
rents as well as higher vacancy at Skyline Mall. Average occupancy at Skyline
Mall declined from 97.3% in 1995 to 95.1% in 1996 due to several stores
remaining vacant during the last six months of 1996. In addition, repairs and
maintenance expenses which cannot be passed through to tenants were higher in
1996 than in 1995.
Expenses from rental properties (including depreciation) increased $11.8
million, or 14.4%, from $81.9 million in 1995 to $93.7 million in 1996. The
increases resulted primarily from the acquisition/development of 2,738 apartment
units subsequent to December 31, 1994 which added $9.0 million in property
operating expenses compared to the prior year. The increase of $2.7 million, or
4.6%, in operating expenses for the core portfolio was primarily due to expected
increases in payroll and related costs, higher furnished apartment expenses and
related marketing costs due to product expansion in 1996, increased repairs and
maintenance costs and increased snow removal costs caused by the record snowfall
in the first quarter of 1996. In addition, real estate taxes were significantly
higher in 1996 primarily in the Virginia submarkets which constitute the
majority of the portfolio. Assessments averaged 5.5% higher in 1996 than in 1995
for the Virginia properties while local property tax rates for Arlington and
Fairfax counties increased by 2.1% and 5.9%, respectively. The substantial
increase in utility costs during the first quarter of 1996 was mostly offset in
the third quarter by an unseasonably cool summer.
The Operating Partnership's core operating margins of approximately 54% for
the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, are generally lower in
comparison to industry averages due primarily to the cost of utilities. The
Operating Partnership, for the most part, owns properties that do not meter
utilities such as electricity and gas separately by apartment unit, thereby
requiring the Operating Partnership to bear utility costs. The majority of the
Operating Partnership's competitors, however, own properties with separately
metered apartment units which require the tenants to pay utilities. Management
estimates that operating margins would be closer to 57% or 58% on a comparable
basis.
PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES. Income from the Property Service Businesses
increased $1.0 million, or 14.2%, during 1996 compared to 1995.
33
<PAGE>
Income before depreciation/amortization for Multifamily and Retail Property
Management Services increased $0.3 million, or 14.3%, resulting primarily from
the impact of a non-recurring fee of $0.6 million related to the termination of
a management agreement with a hotel owned by a related party. The hotel was sold
during the first quarter of 1996. In addition, retail leasing income increased
by approximately $0.2 million due primarily to retail leases for a third party
development project. These increases were offset by approximately $0.5 million
of increased marketing expenditures for furnished corporate apartments, Smith
Advantage and other tenant services. Also, although income from residential
management services increased approximately $0.2 million due to the growth in
the size of the portfolio, the increase was offset by the cost of severance and
other benefits related to a late 1996 management reorganization in this group.
Income before depreciation/amortization for Interior Construction and
Renovation Services decreased $0.1 million, or 11.4%, due primarily to a 4.3%
decrease in net fee revenue caused by a shift to lower margin, third-party
construction management services compared to higher margin general contracting
services provided to affiliated partnerships. The decrease in revenues was
partially offset by a 2.6% decrease in operating expenses resulting primarily
from worker's compensation insurance savings due to favorable claims experience.
Revenue from Engineering and Technical Services increased 5.0%, or $2.0
million, in 1996 to $42.2 million compared to 1995 due primarily to additional
HVAC systems operations and preventative maintenance contracts obtained in late
1995 and throughout 1996. As a result of the growth in revenue, expenses
increased by $1.8 million, or 4.9%, due primarily to additional payroll and
related benefit costs associated with performing the additional work as well as
increased information technology costs. Consequently, income before
depreciation/amortization for Engineering and Technical Services increased 5.1%
to $3.7 million for 1996 compared to $3.5 million in 1995.
Income before depreciation/amortization for Financing Services increased $0.4
million, or 23.7%, due primarily to savings in payroll and related expenses
during the latter half of 1996. These savings were partially offset by reduced
revenue associated with the $19 million decrease in refinancings performed in
1996 compared to 1995.
OTHER. Corporate general and administrative expenses increased by $0.2
million, or 6.4%, due primarily to costs incurred in connection with the
Operating Partnership's ongoing acquisition and development efforts including
write-offs of capitalized costs for terminated acquisition efforts. Interest
expense increased by $6.2 million, or 16.5%, due to the assumption of debt and
additional borrowings under the lines of credit related to the acquisition and
development of multifamily properties.
34
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
COMPARISON TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994
SUMMARY. Net income increased $ 41.8 million from a loss in 1994 of $10.7
million to income of $31.1 million due primarily to consolidation costs of $15.6
million and debt extinguishment costs of $15.2 million in 1994 in conjunction
with the Formation Transactions. In addition, interest expense was $4.8 million
lower in 1995 due to lower rates achieved through the Formation Transactions,
and income from rental properties was $6.4 million higher than 1994 primarily
due to property acquisitions.
RENTAL PROPERTIES. Revenue from rental properties increased $14.0 million, or
10.7%, from $130.9 million for 1994 to $144.9 million for 1995. The acquisition
properties, consisting of 1,369 apartment units, contributed $5.8 million to the
rental revenue increase, excluding the $3.4 million impact of the two properties
transferred into Core on January 1, 1996. The Westerly at Worldgate, a 320-unit
garden apartment property developed by the Company, opened in May, 1995 and was
completed in December, 1995. As of December 31, 1995, it was 75.6% occupied and
contributed approximately $0.9 million in revenue in 1995. Revenue from the core
portfolio increased $2.5 million, or 2.1%, from 1994 to 1995, excluding the $3.4
million impact of the two properties transferred into Core on January 1, 1996.
The lower than expected level of core portfolio rental increase was caused by
higher economic vacancies and increased time between vacancy and subsequent
lease-up in garden apartments in certain submarkets of northern Virginia and the
southeast section of the Washington, D.C. submarket, especially in the second
quarter of 1995. As a consequence of this slower demand in these submarkets,
occupancy in the core portfolio decreased from 97.8% for 1994 to 97.2% for 1995,
and average monthly revenue per apartment unit increased 2.0%, from $845 in 1994
to $862 in 1995 (based on properties owned as of June 30, 1994).
Expenses from rental properties (including depreciation) increased $7.6
million, or 10.3%, from $74.2 million for 1994 to $81.9 million for
1995. The increase resulted primarily from the acquisition of 1,369 units and
the development of 320 units which together added $3.6 million (excluding the
$1.7 million impact of transferring two properties to Core on January 1, 1996)
in operating costs, primarily payroll and utility expenses, as well as
depreciation expense. Expenses from the core residential portfolio increased
$0.9 million (excluding the $1.7 million impact of transferring two properties
to Core on January 1, 1996).
PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES. Income from the Property Service Businesses
increased from $6.6 million for 1994 to $6.9 million for 1995.
Income before depreciation/amortization from Interior Construction and
Renovation increased $0.4 million compared to 1994 due to increased activity in
tenant build-out and renovation projects at office buildings owned by affiliated
partnerships and by increases in a major third party contract.
Income before depreciation/amortization from Financing Services increased
$0.4 million in 1995 compared to 1994 due to an increase in finance fee
revenues. Revenue from Financing Services
35
<PAGE>
increased $0.9 million as $261 million of refinancings were closed in 1995,
versus $168 million in 1994, and an affiliate was billed $0.3 million for
financial advisory services.
Income before depreciation/amortization from Engineering and Technical
Services decreased $0.3 million while revenue increased $3.2 million. These
results are attributed to more HVAC systems operations and preventative
maintenance contracts, which carry lower margins. Additionally, 1994 included an
unusually high level of incremental repair and replacement services for
mechanical and electrical systems associated with third party contracts, which
typically earn higher margins.
OTHER. Corporate general and administrative expenses increased $0.1 million
due to fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Company's and the
Operating Partnership's filings pursuant to the Exchange Act, preparation of the
Company's initial annual report, the registration with the SEC of the dividend
reinvestment plan, and the Company's shelf registration.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS. FFO is defined under the revised definition adopted by
the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") as net
income (loss) (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles) excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring, plus
depreciation/amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry.
Depreciation/amortization of assets not unique to the industry, such as
amortization of deferred financing costs and non-real estate assets, is not
added back. FFO does not represent cash flow from operating activities in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (which, unlike FFO,
generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the
determination of net income) and should not be considered an alternative to net
income as an indication of the Operating Partnership's performance or to cash
flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. The Operating
Partnership considers FFO a meaningful, additional measure of operating
performance because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of real
estate assets diminishes predictably over time, and because industry analysts
have accepted it as a performance measure. Comparison of the Operating
Partnership's presentation of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly
titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to
possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such
REITs.
The Operating Partnership's FFO for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995 and the period June 30,1994 to December 31, 1994 was as follows (in
thousands):
36
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------- 6/30/94 to
1996 1995 12/31/94
---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Income $ 34,817 $ 31,053 $ 15,241
Depreciation of Real Property 17,931 16,258 7,738
-------- -------- --------
Funds from Operations $ 52,748 $ 47,311 $ 22,979
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
SUMMARY
Net cash flow provided by operating activities was $51.0 million for 1996
compared to $53.9 million for 1995. The decrease was primarily due to a
reduction in accounts payable compared to the prior year, reflecting revised
payment terms to vendors, offset by higher operating income contributed by
acquisitions and core growth.
Net cash flow used by the Operating Partnership for investing activities
increased $3.8 million in 1996, from $67.7 million in 1995 to $71.4 million in
1996 due primarily to increases in rental properties acquired and capital
expenditures.
Net cash flow provided by financing activities was $14.9 million in 1996
compared to $4.9 million in 1995 due to $12.5 million of additional line of
credit draws in 1996 to fund cash acquisitions offset by an increase of $2.1
million in distributions. In 1996, the Operating Partnership paid distributions
of $43.3 million, or $1.975 per unit representing three quarters of
distributions at $.49 per unit and one quarter at $.505, a 3.1% increase.
STOCK OFFERING
On February 19, 1997, the Company issued 2.7 million shares of common stock
("the Offering") at a price of $28.375 per share resulting in total proceeds of
$72.2 million, net of underwriting discounts and other estimated Offering costs.
The Company used the net proceeds from the Offering to purchase 2.7 million
limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership. The Operating
Partnership used the resulting proceeds to repay $61.2 million of outstanding
notes payable and $9 million of mortgage debt. The balance was used to fund the
property acquisitions discussed below and for general corporate purposes.
During February and March 1997, the Operating Partnership completed the
acquisition of three multifamily properties totaling 1,828 apartment units for a
total cost of approximately $129 million consisting of Operating Partnership
Units valued at approximately $47 million, assumed debt of approximately $80
million, and cash of approximately $2 million. One of the properties is subject
to
37
<PAGE>
a 5.1% net profits interest in favor of an unaffiliated third party. The
acquisition of these three properties brings to 5,193 the total number of
apartment units acquired since the Company's initial public offering in mid-1994
which represents a 44% increase in the owned portfolio.
On March 12, 1997, the underwriters of the Offering exercised their option to
purchase an additional 0.4 million shares of common stock at $28.375 per share
less underwriting discount. Net proceeds to the Company of $10.9 million were
used to purchase an additional 0.4 million limited partnership units of the
Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership used the resulting proceeds to
repay outstanding amounts on the lines of credit.
ACQUISITIONS AND DEVELOPMENT
The Operating Partnership acquired and developed the following properties
during 1996 and 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Cost (Dollars in Thousands) 1996 1995
--------------------------------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Acquisitions
262-unit garden apartment $ 14,200 $ -
47-unit garden apartment 2,800 -
625-unit high-rise apartment 41,800 -
115-unit high-rise apartment 5,300 -
172-unit high-rise apartment - 6,500
112-unit garden apartment - 5,895
519-unit high-rise apartment - 24,900
348-unit high-rise apartment - 29,000
218-unit garden apartment - 16,000
Development of 320-unit garden apartment - 16,700
-------- --------
$ 64,100 $ 98,995
======== ========
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE>
The 1996 and 1995 acquisitions and development were funded as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Line of credit/construction loan draws $ 58,437 $ 48,054
Assumption of mortgage debt 3,260 30,618
Issuance of Operating Partnership units 2,403 13,727
Cash on hand - 6,596
-------- --------
$ 64,100 $ 98,995
======== ========
</TABLE>
The Operating Partnership has executed a contract to purchase for $9.1
million approximately 17 acres of land for the development of an estimated 630-
unit mid-rise and garden apartment property in Springfield, Virginia. The site
is located adjacent to a new Metrorail and commuter rail station which are under
construction and a regional shopping mall and offers convenient access to major
transportation routes. Budgeted costs for this project are expected to be
approximately $60 million and construction is expected to commence early in the
summer of 1997, as soon as proffer agreements are concluded with government
agencies. Numerous other acquisition and development projects are being pursued
by the Operating Partnership.
DEBT
As of December 31, 1996, the Operating Partnership had mortgage indebtedness
and other borrowings collateralized by all 43 of the Properties as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Dollars in
Thousands Interest Rate
------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Long-term, fixed rate debt:
Mortgages $ 399,563 8.05%
$83M Acquisition Line of Credit 30,000 7.27%
Short-term, variable rate debt:
Mortgages 17,245 7.20%
$100M Acquisition Line of Credit 82,050 7.16%
Construction Loan 17,686 7.32%
--------- -----
$ 546,544 7.82%
========= =====
</TABLE>
As of December 31, 1996, the Operating Partnership's Debt to Total Market
Capitalization Ratio was 45.9%, based on 21,999,464 Operating Partnership units
outstanding measured at the Company's stock price of $29.25. The Operating
Partnership's Debt Coverage Ratios for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995 were 2.53 and 2.44, respectively.
39
<PAGE>
Subsequent to the Offering, the related repayment of debt and the property
acquisitions, principal payments on outstanding debt are due in the following
years (in millions):
1997 $ 36.7
1998 34.6
1999 115.1
2000 2.5
2001 127.9
Thereafter 228.4
-------
$ 545.2
=======
Subsequent to the Offering and the related debt repayment, the Operating
Partnership had $126 million of unused borrowing capacity available on lines of
credit.
The Operating Partnership anticipates meeting principal repayment
requirements through long-term borrowings, public or private issuances of debt
securities or public or private equity offerings.
OTHER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. In 1996, total capital improvements were $7.4 million,
of which $6.1 million, or $489 per apartment unit, was for the core portfolio.
Approximately 40% of the capital expenditures on the core portfolio are
considered by management to be revenue generating or economic improvements, as
shown below, which management believes directly affect the Operating
Partnership's ability to increase rents. The remaining capital expenditures on
the core portfolio indirectly influence the Operating Partnership's ability to
increase rents and are considered non-revenue generating. A summary of core
capital expenditures during 1996 follows:
40
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total $ Actual # of Average $ Per Average $ Per
Expenditure Type Spent Units Improved Unit Improved Core Unit
- ---------------- ------- ---------------- --------------- --------------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Installations/Replacements:
Appliances $ 612 1,169 $ 523 $ 49
Carpet 780 622 1,254 63
Other 34 73 466 3
Renovations:
Kitchen 463 183 2,531 37
Bath 526 214 2,459 43
-------- -------- ------- ------
Total Revenue-Generating
Improvements 2,415 195
Non-Revenue Generating
Improvements 3,676 294
-------- ------
Total Capital Expenditures
- Core Portfolio $ 6,091 $ 489
======== ======
</TABLE>
Income Taxes. The Property Service Businesses are taxable corporations, and
thus, pay Federal and state income taxes on their net income. Such taxes
amounted to $0.4 million and $0.6 million for 1996 and 1995 and $0.4 million for
the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994.
Effect of Inflation. Substantially all of the leases at the multifamily
properties are for a term of one year or less, which enables the Operating
Partnership to seek increased rents upon renewal or reletting of apartments.
Retail tenant leases provide for pass-through of common area maintenance, real
estate taxes and other operating costs to tenants, which reduces the impact of
inflation.
41
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
See Index to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements on Page F-1 of
this Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information required by this item with respect to directors is hereby
incorporated by reference to the material appearing under the caption "Election
of Directors" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting
of shareholders to be held in 1997 (the "Proxy Statement"). Information required
by this item with respect to executive officers is provided in Item 1 of this
report. See "Executive Officers of the Company."
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership of such securities with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the NYSE. To the best of the Company's knowledge, all
required reports were timely filed during and with respect to the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference
to the material appearing under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference
to the material appearing under the caption "Voting Securities and Principal
Holders Thereof" in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference
to the material appearing under the caption "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions" in the Proxy Statement.
42
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
14(a)(1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements and Schedule
on Page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
14(a)(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements and Schedule
on Page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
All other schedules have been omitted because the required information
of such other schedules is not present in amounts sufficient to
require submission of the schedule or because the required information
is included in the consolidated and combined financial statements.
14(a)(3) EXHIBITS
**2.1 Third Party Management and Leasing, Hotel Asset Management and
Corporate Services Business Transfer Agreement by and between
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc. and Smith Property
Management, Inc.
**2.2 REIT Properties Management and Leasing Business Transfer
Agreement by and between Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. and
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P.
**2.3 Assignment by Robert H. Smith, Clarice R. Smith, Robert P. Kogod
and Arlene R. Kogod to Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. of 99%
of all Partnership Interests of Residential Associates Limited
Partnership
**2.4 Assignment and Assumption Agreement by Residential Associates
Limited Partnership and Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P.
**2.5 Debt Assumption Agreement and Accord and Satisfaction of Debt by
Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. and Charles E. Smith
Residential Realty L.P.
**2.6 Debt Contribution Agreement between Charles E. Smith Management,
Inc. and Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. (the "Operating
Partnership")
**3.1 First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
the Operating Partnership, as amended
**3.2 Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership
*4.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Charles E.
Smith Residential Realty, Inc. (the "Company")
43
<PAGE>
4.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by
reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-93986).
**10.1 Noncompetition Agreement by and among the Company, the Operating
Partnership and Robert P. Kogod
**10.2 Registration Rights and Lock-up Agreement
**10.3 Pledge Agreement
**10.4 First Amended and Restated 1994 Employee Stock and Unit Option
Plan
**10.5 First Amended and Restated 1994 Employee Restricted Stock and
Restricted Unit Plan
**10.6 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
**10.7 Subscription Agreement
**10.8 Voting Stock Partnership Agreement for Smith Property Management
Partnership
**10.9 Voting Stock Partnership Agreement for Smith Management
Construction Partnership
**10.10 Voting Stock Partnership Agreement for Consolidated Engineering
Services Partnership
**10.11 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Smith Realty
Company
*10.12 By-Laws of Smith Property Management, Inc.
*10.13 Articles of Incorporation of Smith Management Construction, Inc.
*10.14 By-Laws of Smith Management Construction, Inc.
*10.15 Articles of Incorporation of Consolidated Engineering Services,
Inc.
*10.16 By-Laws of Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc.
*10.17 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith One, Inc.
*10.18 By-Laws of Smith One, Inc.
**10.19 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
One L.P.
**10.20 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
One (D.C.) L.P.
*10.21 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Two, Inc.
*10.22 By-Laws of Smith Two, Inc.
**10.23 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Two L.P.
**10.24 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Two (D.C.) L.P.
*10.25 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Three, Inc.
*10.26 By-Laws of Smith Three, Inc.
**10.27 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Three L.P.
**10.28 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Three (D.C.) L.P.
*10.29 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Four, Inc.
*10.30 By-Laws of Smith Four, Inc.
**10.31 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Four L.P.
**10.32 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Smith
Five, Inc.
*10.33 By-Laws of Smith Five, Inc.
**10.34 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Five (D.C.) L.P.
44
<PAGE>
**10.35 License Agreement between Charles E. Smith Management, Inc.
and the Company
**10.36 License Agreement between Charles E. Smith Management, Inc.
and the Operating Partnership
10.37 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Five L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.0 of the
Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 1994)
**10.38 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Five L.P.
***10.39 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and between the
Operating Partnership and PNC Bank, National Association, et al.
10.40 Deed of Trust and Security Agreement between Smith property
Holdings Three L.P. ("Smith Three") and The Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company ("Northwestern") (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1994)
10.41 Guarantee of Recourse Obligations by Smith Three and the
Operating Partnership (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
10.3 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.42 Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents between Smith Three and
Northwestern (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 of
the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.43 Promissory Note of Smith Three to Northwestern (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1994)
10.44 Purchase Money Deed of Trust and Security Agreement between Smith
Property Holdings Three (D.C.) L.P. ("Smith Three D.C.") and
Northwestern (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.6 of
the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.45 Guarantee of Recourse Obligations by Smith Three D.C. and the
Operating Partnership (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
10.7 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.46 Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents between Smith Three D.C.
and Northwestern (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.8
of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.47 Purchase Money Promissory Note of Smith Three D.C. to
Northwestern (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.9 of
the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.48 Supplemental Loan Agreement by and among Smith Property Holdings
Two L.P. ("Smith Two"), Smith Property Holdings Two (D.C.) L.P.
("Smith Two D.C.") and GMAC Mortgage Corporation of PA ("GMAC")
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.10 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended
June 30, 1994)
45
<PAGE>
10.49 Multifamily Note of Smith Two to GMAC (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 10.11 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.50 Multifamily Note of Smith Two D.C. to GMAC (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.12 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1994)
10.51 Supplemental Loan Agreement by and among Smith Property Holdings
One L.P. ("Smith One"), Smith Property Holdings One (D.C.) L.P.
("Smith One D.C.") and GMAC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.13 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.52 Multifamily Note of Smith One to GMAC (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 10.14 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.53 Multifamily Note of Smith One D.C. to GMAC (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.15 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1994)
10.54 Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents by Smith One D.C. to GMAC
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.16 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended June 30, 1994)
10.55 Property Management Agreement by and between Smith One and the
Operating Partnership (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
10.17 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.56 Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents and Security
Agreement between Smith One D.C. and GMAC (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.18 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1994)
10.57 Commercial Leasing and Property Management Agreement between
Smith Three and the Operating Partnership (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.19 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1994)
**10.58 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Employment
Services L.P.
**10.59 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Smith Employment
Services L.P.
10.60 Second Restated and Amended Agreement of Limited Partnership of
First Herndon Associates Limited Partnership (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1995)
10.61 Second Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership of
First Herndon Associates Limited Partnership (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30,
1995)
10.62 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Six, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31,
1995)
46
<PAGE>
10.63 By-Laws of Smith Six, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 10.2 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1995)
10.64 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Six
L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 of the
Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 1995)
10.65 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Six (D.C.) L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 of
the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 1995)
***10.66 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Seven, Inc.
***10.67 By-Laws of Smith Seven, Inc.
***10.68 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Seven L.P.
***10.69 Commitment for Mortgage Loan to the Operating Partnership from
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
___________________________________
*Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit in
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11, No. 33-75288.
**Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit in
the Operating Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1994.
*** Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit
in the Operating Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1995 filed on March 29, 1996.
14(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
A report on Form 8-K was filed on August 13, 1996 providing
information on four Properties acquired by the Operating Partnership
during 1996, including certain unaudited balance sheets and statements
of operations of the Operating Partnership reflecting the acquisitions
and statements of revenue and certain expenses for the Van Ness South,
1841 Columbia Road, Charter Oak, and Governor Spotswood Properties for
the year ending in December, 1995, and applicable subsequent periods.
14(c) EXHIBITS
The list of Exhibits filed with this report is set forth in response
to Item 14(a)(3). The required exhibit index has been filed with the
exhibits.
14(d) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See Index to Financial Statements and Schedules on Page F-1 of this
Form 10-K.
47
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this
31st day of March, 1997.
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
BY: CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY,
INC., ITS GENERAL PARTNER
By: /s/ Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr.
--------------------------------------
Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr.
President and Chief Operating Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on this 31st day of March, 1997.
SIGNATURE TITLE WITH THE GENERAL PARTNER
/s/ Robert H. Smith Co-Chairman of the Board, Co-Chief
- ------------------------------ Executive Officer, and Director
Robert H. Smith
/s/ Robert P. Kogod Co-Chairman of the Board, Co-Chief
- ------------------------------ Executive Officer, and Director
Robert P. Kogod
/s/ Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr. President, Chief Operating Officer, and
- ------------------------------ Director
Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr.
/s/ Wesley D. Minami Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
- ------------------------------ Officer
Wesley D. Minami
48
<PAGE>
/s/ Charles R. Hagen Vice President, Controller, and Chief
- ------------------------------- Accounting Officer
Charles R. Hagen
/s/ Fred J. Brinkman Director
- -------------------------------
Fred J. Brinkman
/s/ Charles B. Gill Director
- -------------------------------
Charles B. Gill
/s/ Mandell J. Ourisman Director
- -------------------------------
Mandell J. Ourisman
/s/ Mallory Walker Director
- -------------------------------
Mallory Walker
49
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
(If filed herewith)
EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT PAGE
- ----------- ------- -----------------
**2.1 Third Party Management and Leasing, Hotel Asset Management and
Corporate Services Business Transfer Agreement by and between Charles
E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc. and Smith Property Management, Inc.
**2.2 REIT Properties Management and Leasing Business Transfer Agreement
by and between Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. and Charles E. Smith
Residential Realty L.P.
**2.3 Assignment by Robert H. Smith, Clarice R. Smith, Robert P. Kogod and
Arlene R. Kogod to Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. of 99% of all
Partnership Interests of Residential Associates Limited Partnership
**2.4 Assignment and Assumption Agreement by Residential Associates
Limited Partnership and Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P.
**2.5 Debt Assumption Agreement and Accord and Satisfaction of Debt by
Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. and Charles E. Smith Residential
Realty L.P.
**2.6 Debt Contribution Agreement between Charles E. Smith Management,
Inc. and Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. (the "Operating
Partnership")
**3.1 First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Operating Partnership, as amended
**3.2 Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership
*4.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Charles E. Smith
Residential Realty, Inc. (the "Company")
4.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by
reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit in the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-93986).
**10.1 Noncompetition Agreement by and among the Company, the Operating
Partnership and Robert P. Kogod
**10.2 Registration Rights and Lock-up Agreement
**10.3 Pledge Agreement
**10.4 First Amended and Restated 1994 Employee Stock and Unit Option Plan
**10.5 First Amended and Restated 1994 Employee Restricted Stock and
Restricted Unit Plan
**10.6 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
**10.7 Subscription Agreement
**10.8 Voting Stock Partnership Agreement for Smith Property Management
Partnership
**10.9 Voting Stock Partnership Agreement for Smith Management Construction
Partnership
50
<PAGE>
**10.10 Voting Stock Partnership Agreement for Consolidated Engineering
Services Partnership
**10.11 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Smith Realty
Company
*10.12 By-Laws of Smith Property Management, Inc.
*10.13 Articles of Incorporation of Smith Management Construction, Inc.
*10.14 By-Laws of Smith Management Construction, Inc.
*10.15 Articles of Incorporation of Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc.
*10.16 By-Laws of Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc.
*10.17 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith One, Inc.
*10.18 By-Laws of Smith One, Inc.
**10.19 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings One L.P.
**10.20 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings One (D.C.)
L.P.
*10.21 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Two, Inc.
*10.22 By-Laws of Smith Two, Inc.
**10.23 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Two L.P.
**10.24 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Two (D.C.)
L.P.
*10.25 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Three, Inc.
*10.26 By-Laws of Smith Three, Inc.
**10.27 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Three L.P.
**10.28 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Three
(D.C.) L.P.
*10.29 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Four, Inc.
*10.30 By-Laws of Smith Four, Inc.
**10.31 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Four L.P.
**10.32 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Five, Inc.
*10.33 By-Laws of Smith Five, Inc.
**10.34 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Five
(D.C.) L.P.
**10.35 License Agreement between Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. and the
Company
**10.36 License Agreement between Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. and the
Operating Partnership
10.37 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Five L.P.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.0 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 1994)
**10.38 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings
Five L.P.
***10.39 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and between the Operating
Partnership and PNC Bank, National Association, et al.
51
<PAGE>
10.40 Deed of Trust and Security Agreement between Smith property Holdings
Three L.P. ("Smith Three") and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
Company ("Northwestern") (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.2 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.41 Guarantee of Recourse Obligations by Smith Three and the Operating
Partnership (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 of the
Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended June 30, 1994)
10.42 Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents between Smith Three and
Northwestern (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 of the
Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended June 30, 1994)
10.43 Promissory Note of Smith Three to Northwestern (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.5 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.44 Purchase Money Deed of Trust and Security Agreement between Smith
Property Holdings Three (D.C.) L.P. ("Smith Three D.C.") and
Northwestern (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.6 of the
Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended June 30, 1994)
10.45 Guarantee of Recourse Obligations by Smith Three D.C. and the
Operating Partnership (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.7 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.46 Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents between Smith Three D.C. and
Northwestern (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.8 of the
Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended June 30, 1994)
10.47 Purchase Money Promissory Note of Smith Three D.C. to Northwestern
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.9 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June
30, 1994)
10.48 Supplemental Loan Agreement by and among Smith Property Holdings
Two L.P. ("Smith Two"), Smith Property Holdings Two (D.C.) L.P.
("Smith Two D.C.") and GMAC Mortgage Corporation of PA ("GMAC")
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.10 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June
30, 1994)
10.49 Multifamily Note of Smith Two to GMAC (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 10.11 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.50 Multifamily Note of Smith Two D.C. to GMAC (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.12 of the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
52
<PAGE>
10.51 Supplemental Loan Agreement by and among Smith Property Holdings
One L.P. ("Smith One"), Smith Property Holdings One (D.C.) L.P.
("Smith One D.C.") and GMAC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No.
10.13 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.52 Multifamily Note of Smith One to GMAC (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 10.14 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.53 Multifamily Note of Smith One D.C. to GMAC (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 10.15 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.54 Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents by Smith One D.C. to GMAC
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.16 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June
30, 1994)
10.55 Property Management Agreement by and between Smith One and the
Operating Partnership (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.17 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.56 Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement
between Smith One D.C. and GMAC (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 10.18 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
10.57 Commercial Leasing and Property Management Agreement between
Smith Three and the Operating Partnership (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit No. 10.19 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1994)
**10.58 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Employment Services L.P.
**10.59 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Smith Employment Services L.P.
10.60 Second Restated and Amended Agreement of Limited Partnership of First
Herndon Associates Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1995)
10.61 Second Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership of First
Herndon Associates Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1995)
10.62 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Six, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1995)
10.63 By-Laws of Smith Six, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
No. 10.2 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1995)
53
<PAGE>
10.64 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Six L.P.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended
March 31, 1995)
10.65 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Six (D.C.)
L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 of the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended
March 31, 1995)
***10.66 Certificate of Incorporation of Smith Seven, Inc.
***10.67 By-Laws of Smith Seven, Inc.
***10.68 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith Property Holdings Seven L.P.
***10.69 Commitment for Mortgage Loan to the Operating Partnership from
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant E-1
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP E-2
___________________________________
*Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11, No. 33-75288.
**Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit in the
Operating Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.
***Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit in
the Operating Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995 filed on March 29, 1996.
54
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
Index to Financial Statements and Schedules
-------------------------------------------
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. AND CES GROUP
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
Pages
-----
Report of Independent Public Accountants F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenses F-4
Consolidated Statements of Partner's Equity and Other
Limited Partners' Interest and Combined
Statement of Partners' Deficit F-5
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows F-6
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements F-7 to F-24
SCHEDULES FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation S-1 to S-2
All other Schedules have been omitted because the required information
of such other Schedules is not present in amounts sufficient to require
submission of the schedule or because the required information is
included in the consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-1
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Unitholders of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Charles E. Smith
Residential Realty L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partner's equity and other limited partners' interest, and cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the period from
June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994, and the combined statement of revenues and
expenses, partners' deficit and cash flows of CES Group for the period from
January 1, 1994 to June 29, 1994. These consolidated and combined financial
statements and the schedule referred to below are the responsibility of the
management of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated and combined financial statements and
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Charles E. Smith
Residential Realty L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and
the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the period from June 30, 1994 to December
31, 1994, and the combined statement of revenues and expenses and cash flows of
the CES Group for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 29, 1994, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index to financial
statements is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and
Exchange Commission's rules and is not a required part of the basic financial
statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in our audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly
stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole.
Washington, D.C. Arthur Andersen LLP
January 30, 1997
F-2
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------- -------------
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C>
Rental property, at predecessor cost, net $ 267,658 $ 276,269
Rental property, acquired and developed, net 202,435 138,221
Cash and cash equivalents 3,898 9,478
Tenants' security deposits 3,521 3,634
Escrow funds 6,087 5,371
Investment in and advances to Property Service Businesses
and other 10,756 8,348
Deferred charges, net 17,646 18,782
Other assets 10,210 9,219
----------- -------------
$ 522,211 $ 469,322
=========== =============
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities
Mortgage loans $ 416,808 $ 413,973
Notes payable 129,736 69,204
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 9,525 12,693
Tenants' security deposits 3,521 3,634
Due to related parties - 1,441
----------- -------------
Total liabilities 559,590 500,945
----------- -------------
Commitments and contingencies
Other Limited Partners' Interest
12,029,857 and 12,205,439 units issued and outstanding
at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, at
redemption value 351,873 288,663
----------- -------------
Partner's Equity
General Partner's General and Limited Partnership Interest
9,969,607 and 9,708,123 units issued and outstanding
at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively (389,252) (320,286)
----------- -------------
$ 522,211 $ 469,322
=========== =============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATONS
AND
CES GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Unit Data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. CES Group
---------------------------------------- ---------
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------- June 30, 1994 to January 1, 1994
1996 1995 December 31, 1994 to June 29, 1994
--------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rental Properties:
Revenues $ 166,283 $ 144,909 $ 67,391 $ 63,496
Expenses
Operating costs 65,350 57,007 26,633 24,682
Real estate taxes 10,429 8,620 3,826 3,731
Depreciation and amortization 17,931 16,258 7,738 7,626
---------- -------- -------- --------
Total expenses 93,710 81,885 38,197 36,039
Property Service Businesses:
Revenues - - - 27,792
Expenses
Operating costs - - - 24,231
Depreciation and amortization - - - 763
---------- -------- -------- --------
Total expenses - - - 24,994
Equity in income of Property
Service Businesses 7,846 6,868 3,785 -
Corporate general and administrative expenses (3,025) (2,842) (1,171) (1,550)
Interest income 1,029 1,424 825 970
Interest expense (43,606) (37,421) (17,392) (24,798)
Consolidation costs - - - (15,577)
---------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before extraordinary item 34,817 31,053 15,241 (10,700)
Extraordinary item - loss on extinguishment
of debt - - - (15,195)
---------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) $ 34,817 $ 31,053 $ 15,241 $(25,895)
========== ======== ======== ========
Net income per unit $ 1.59 $ 1.44 $ 0.72
========== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNER'S EQUITY AND OTHER LIMITED PARTNERS' INTEREST
AND
CES GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' DEFICIT
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Unit Data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Partners' Deficit
-----------------
CES GROUP
<S> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993 $(216,006)
Investments in and advances, net (221)
Contributions 565
Distributions (7,133)
Liabilities retained by predecessor partnerships 2,268
Expenses in excess of revenues (25,895)
---------
Balance, June 29, 1994 $(246,422)
=========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
General Partner's Other
General and Limited Limited Partners'
Interest Interest
-------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
Balance, June 29, 1994 $ - $ -
Contribution by Predecessors of assets,
at historical cost, net of liabilities - (244,208)
Contribution by Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc. 201,374 -
Unit grants - 2,280
Deferred compensation - unit grants - (1,995)
Net income 6,532 8,709
Distributions ($.48 per unit) (4,344) (5,868)
Adjustment to reflect Other Limited Partners' interest
at redemption value (551,329) 551,329
--------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1994 (347,767) 310,247
Units exchanged for acquisitions - 15,491
Adjustment for unit grants - 570
Net income 13,405 17,648
Distributions ($1.915 per unit) (17,693) (23,524)
Adjustment to reflect Other Limited Partners' interest
at redemption value 31,769 (31,769)
--------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1995 (320,286) 288,663
Units exchanged for acquisitions - 2,403
Adjustment for unit grants - 333
Net income 15,755 19,062
Distributions ($1.975 per unit) (19,469) (23,840)
Adjustment to reflect Other Limited Partners' interest
at redemption value (65,252) 65,252
--------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1996 $(389,252) $ 351,873
========= =========
Units issued and outstanding at December 31, 1996 9,969,607 12,029,857
========= ==========
Units issued and outstanding at December 31, 1995 9,708,123 12,205,439
========= ==========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
AND
CES GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. CES Group
------------------------------------------- ----------------
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------- June 30, 1994 to January 1, 1994
1996 1995 December 31, 1994 to June 29, 1994
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) $ 34,817 $ 31,053 $ 15,241 $(25,895)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Extraordinary item - - - 15,195
Consolidation costs - - - 15,577
Depreciation and amortization 21,039 19,547 9,257 8,847
(Increase) decrease in escrow funds (716) 2,107 (6,464) (999)
Increase in other assets (991) (1,721) (1,656) (5,738)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and
accrued expenses (3,168) 2,872 3,499 5,526
Increase in other liabilities - - - 1,323
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 50,981 53,858 19,877 13,836
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisitions and development of rental property (60,173) (55,152) (40,005) -
Additions to rental property (7,425) (5,257) (2,601) (2,012)
Decrease in notes receivable, related parties - - - 6,247
(Decrease) increase in related party payables:
Property Service Businesses (635) (8,535) 9,171 -
Affiliates (469) (703) 1,172 -
Predecessor (337) 33 (681) -
Cash transferred from predecessors - - 15,395 -
Decrease (increase) in investment in and advances
to Property Service Businesses and other (2,408) 1,939 (9,117) -
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities (71,447) (67,675) (26,666) 4,235
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to deferred charges (1,720) (1,427) (985) -
Capital contribution of the Company - - 201,374 -
Mortgages:
Proceeds 31,095 - 352,354 -
Repayments (31,520) (466) (479,075) (2,699)
Notes payable:
Proceeds 76,532 48,054 21,150 -
Repayments (16,000) - - -
Net proceeds (repayment) of notes payable,
related parties - - (26,232) 1,242
Financing fees and consolidation costs - - (33,235) (6,891)
Distributions (43,309) (41,216) (10,212) (5,583)
Other, net (192) - - (1,206)
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 14,886 4,945 25,139 (15,137)
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS (5,580) (8,872) 18,350 2,934
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 9,478 18,350 - 13,663
---------- ---------- ----------------- ----------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD $ 3,898 $ 9,478 $ 18,350 $ 16,597
========== ========== ================= ================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
AND CES GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND FORMATION OF COMPANY
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") was
organized in Delaware in 1993. The Operating Partnership had no operations prior
to the completion of the business combination (discussed below) which occurred
on June 30, 1994. Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc. (the "Company") was
formed in June, 1993 with the intent of qualifying as a real estate investment
trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In
connection with the business combination, the Company, on June 30, 1994, raised
equity through an initial public offering and a private placement (the
"Offerings"), and issued debt in a series of concurrent private financing
transactions. The proceeds from the Offerings were used to acquire the 1.0% sole
general partnership and a 41.7% limited partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership. The Operating Partnership is the successor entity to CES Group (the
"Predecessor").
Simultaneous with the Offerings, the entities that owned the properties and
the related service businesses included in the CES Group transferred the
properties (the "Properties") and the management, development, leasing, interior
construction and renovation, engineering and technical services, and financing
services business segments of the Predecessor to the Operating Partnership (or
corporations in which the Operating Partnership owns substantially all of the
equity) and received in exchange, directly or indirectly, units of limited
partnership in the Operating Partnership. (The transferring entities and their
owners, which include Robert H. Smith and Robert P. Kogod and their families,
and other former owners of indirect interests in the Properties, are referred to
collectively as the "Other Limited Partners").
The Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries are engaged in the ownership,
operation, management, leasing, acquisition, expansion and development of real
estate properties, primarily residential multifamily properties. As of December
31, 1996, the Operating Partnership owned 41 existing multifamily properties
containing 15,200 apartment units, and owned and operated two free-standing
community retail shopping centers, aggregating 436,000 square feet. All
properties are located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Additionally,
the Operating Partnership owns substantially all of the equity in entities which
provide multifamily and retail property management and leasing, interior
construction and renovation, building engineering and technical services, and
financial advisory services (collectively the "Property Service Businesses").
The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities contributed by the
Predecessor on June 30, 1994 (at historical net book value) for a 57.3% limited
partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (dollar amounts in millions):
F-7
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Rental and other properties, at historical cost, net
of accumulated depreciation and amortization $ 293.9
Mortgage and other debt (565.1)
Other assets, net 24.8
----------
Net deficit of CES Group (246.4)
Property Service Businesses
accounted for using the equity method 2.2
----------
Net carry-over deficit transferred to the
Operating Partnership $ (244.2)
==========
</TABLE>
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 1996 and
December 31, 1995 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
partners' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
and for the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994 include all of the
accounts of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiary financing partnerships.
The Operating Partnership uses the equity method of accounting for its
investment in the Property Service Businesses.
The accompanying combined statements of revenue and expenses, and of cash
flows of the CES Group for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 29, 1994
include all of the accounts of the CES Group. The CES Group financial statements
have been presented on a combined basis (including the Property Service
Businesses) because the majority of the entities which owned the Properties and
the Property Service Businesses had certain common general or limited partners
and/or stockholders.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
RENTAL PROPERTY
The assets (including the Properties) that were merged or transferred were
recorded at Predecessor cost. The Operating Partnership records acquired or
developed rental property at cost, which includes cost of acquisition,
development, construction and interest and real estate taxes incurred during the
original construction period. Ordinary repairs and maintenance, such as minor
replacements and painting, are expensed as incurred; major improvements, such as
new HVAC equipment, carpeting and kitchen/bath renovations, are capitalized when
they extend the useful life, increase capacity or improve the efficiency of the
asset. Depreciation on buildings and improvements is computed using the
straight-line method over estimated useful asset lives as follows:
F-8
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Base building 40 years
Land improvements 20 years
Building components 7 to 20 years
Tenant improvements Shorter of remaining lease term or useful life
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 5 to 10 years
</TABLE>
DEFERRED CHARGES
Deferred charges of the Operating Partnership consist primarily of permanent
loan fees, which are being amortized over the term of the notes using the
effective interest rate method, and retail lease acquisition costs, which are
being amortized over the term of the related lease.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Rental income attributable to residential leases is recognized when due from
tenants. The Operating Partnership requires residential tenants to initially
execute a one-year lease. At the expiration of the lease term, if not renewed,
the lease converts to a month-to-month basis.
Minimum rental income attributable to retail leases is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease regardless of when payments are
due. Minimum rental income recognized in excess of payments due was $6.8 million
and $5.9 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and is included in
other assets. The lease agreements contain provisions that provide for
additional rentals based on the tenants' sales volume and reimbursement from the
tenants for their share of real estate taxes and certain common area maintenance
costs. Additional rentals are recognized on the accrual basis.
The future minimum lease payments to be received by the Operating Partnership
under noncancelable retail leases as of December 31, 1996, are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ending
December 31,
------------
<S> <C>
1997 $ 7,589
1998 7,439
1999 7,067
2000 6,977
2001 6,598
Thereafter 74,075
--------
$109,745
========
</TABLE>
F-9
<PAGE>
INCOME TAXES
These financial statements contain no provision for Federal income taxes
since the entity is a partnership and, therefore, all Federal income tax
liabilities and/or tax benefits are passed through to the individual partners in
accordance with the partnership agreement and the Internal Revenue Code. The
Operating Partnership's income tax basis in its assets and liabilities was $470
million and $558 million, respectively, at December 31, 1996 and $426 million
and $498 million, respectively, at December 31,1995.
PER UNIT DATA
Earnings per unit of the Operating Partnership for the years ended December
31, 1996 and 1995 and for the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994 is
computed based on weighted average units outstanding during the period of 21.9
million, 21.6 million and 21.2 million, respectively. Historical per unit data
for periods prior to the public offering is not relevant.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and cash equivalent investments
with original maturities of three months or less.
CONSOLIDATION COSTS AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS
Although the Predecessor was ultimately reimbursed for all costs incurred
related to the transfer of the Properties just prior to the Offerings, such
costs have been reflected by the Predecessor as an expense in the Combined
Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period from January 1, 1994 to June
29, 1994, and the reimbursement has been treated as a distribution.
Additionally, the extraordinary item of $15.2 million, which represents the
prepayment penalties required by the lenders in retiring the mortgage debt, is
reflected by the Predecessor as an expense in the Combined Statement of Revenues
and Expenses as such debt retirement was required to transfer the Properties to
the Operating Partnership.
USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions related to the net realizable value of rental property, the
collectibility of accounts and notes receivable, and the outcome of asserted and
unasserted claims that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-10
<PAGE>
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On January 1, 1996, the Operating Partnership implemented Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-
Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" which provides
guidance on the carrying value of long-lived assets. Implementation of the
standard had no effect on the consolidated financial statements. Management
assesses for impairment any property whenever events or circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recognized when the estimated future net cash flows from the properties are less
than its carrying value.
The Operating Partnership also implemented, on January 1, 1996, Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), which requires entities to measure compensation
costs related to awards of stock-based compensation using either the fair value
method or the intrinsic value method. Under the fair value method, compensation
expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award.
Under the intrinsic value method, compensation expense is equal to the excess,
if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date over the
amount the employee must pay to acquire the stock. Companies electing to use the
intrinsic value method must disclose the impact on net income and earnings per
share as if the fair value method had been used. The Operating Partnership
elected to account for stock-based compensation programs using the intrinsic
value method consistent with existing accounting policies. (See Footnote 11 for
additional required disclosures.)
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications of the prior years' information have been made to
conform to the current year's presentation.
3. RENTAL PROPERTY AND ACQUISITIONS
RENTAL PROPERTY
Rental property consists of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):
F-11
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Land, at Predecessor cost $ 25,452 $ 25,452
Land, acquired 55,891 34,325
Buildings and improvements,
at Predecessor cost 427,333 421,577
Buildings and improvements,
acquired or developed 151,324 105,760
-------- --------
660,000 587,114
Less: Accumulated depreciation 189,907 172,624
-------- --------
$470,093 $414,490
======== ========
</TABLE>
Depreciation expense of the Operating Partnership was $17.7 million and $15.9
million for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and $7.7
million for the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994. Depreciation
expense of the CES Group was $7.5 million for the period from January 1, 1994 to
June 29, 1994. Repairs and maintenance expense of the Operating Partnership was
$11.8 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, and $7.2 million for the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31,
1994. Repairs and maintenance expense of the CES Group was $6.9 million for the
period from January 1, 1994 to June 29, 1994.
ACQUISITIONS
During 1996, the Operating Partnership acquired four properties for $64.1
million, adding 1,049 apartment units. In two of the transactions, the Operating
Partnership issued a total of approximately 102,000 Operating Partnership units
valued at approximately $2.4 million. The conversion of these units into Company
common stock is restricted for up to two years. In one of the transactions, the
Operating Partnership assumed a $3.3 million mortgage loan.
During 1995, the Operating Partnership acquired five properties for $82.3
million adding 1,369 apartment units. In two of the transactions, the Operating
Partnership issued a total of approximately 561,000 Operating Partnership units
valued at $13.7 million. The conversion of these units into Company common stock
is restricted for up to two years. In two of the transactions, the Operating
Partnership assumed a total of $30.6 million in mortgage loans.
4. INVESTMENT IN AND ADVANCES TO PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES AND
OTHER
The Operating Partnership uses the equity method of accounting for its
investment in the Property Service Businesses, which include Smith Realty
Company ("SRC"), Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc., and Smith Management
Construction, Inc. These companies provide services which
F-12
<PAGE>
include property management, leasing, engineering and technical, financing and
property construction and renovation. Under the equity method, the Operating
Partnership's investment is adjusted for its proportionate share of earnings or
losses of the Property Service Businesses and by dividends received. The
Operating Partnership recognized its 99% interest in the earnings of each of the
Property Service Businesses which aggregated $7.8 million, $6.9 million and $3.8
million for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the period from
June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994, respectively. The Operating Partnership
received distributions aggregating $8.9 million, $8.2 million and $4.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the period from June 30,
1994 to December 31, 1994, respectively.
The Property Service Businesses provide services to the Operating Partnership
under one-year agreements which are automatically renewable. Such services are
generally provided at cost (including a proportionate share of total overhead)
except property management and leasing services which are provided at cost plus
ten percent. The Property Service Businesses also provide services to certain
partnerships which own commercial office buildings and have Messrs. Smith and
Kogod as the general partners ("Affiliates"). Such services are generally
provided at cost and overhead plus a mark-up, except for certain engineering and
technical services which are provided at cost and overhead.
In addition to the above, SRC provided administrative services such as
accounting, systems and human resources services to the Operating Partnership
and Affiliates at cost and overhead in accordance with cost and executive
sharing agreements. In management's opinion, the allocation methods provide
reasonable estimates of the costs that would have been incurred had the services
been provided by the Operating Partnership.
Total fees and administrative services charged by the Property Service
Businesses to the Operating Partnership and Affiliates follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------- June 30, 1994 to
1996 1995 December 31, 1994
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fees Charged by Property Service Businesses to:
- ----------------------------------------------
Operating Partnership $ 7,969 $ 7,950 $ 5,774
Affiliates 31,321 28,964 9,978
Cost of Administrative Services charged by SRC to:
- -------------------------------------------------
Operating Partnership 7,459 8,090 3,333
Affiliates (1) 5,630 4,948 2,862
</TABLE>
(1) Additionally, an Affiliate was charged $0.3 million in 1995 for financial
advisory services based upon estimated time incurred.
F-13
<PAGE>
At December 31, 1996, the Operating Partnership had net advances to the
Property Service Businesses of $3.9 million reflected in the investment balance.
At December 31, 1995, the Operating Partnership had net payables to the Property
Service Businesses of $0.6 million reflected in Due to Related Parties.
Combined summarized balance sheet information for the Property Service
Businesses follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets(1)
Accounts receivable $ 20,699 $ 14,628
Property, net 4,140 3,651
Other, net 302 2,496
-------- --------
$ 25,141 $ 20,775
======== ========
Liabilities(1)
Accounts payable $ 10,494 $ 9,000
Deferred revenue 3,758 3,912
Due to related parties 7,130 2,150
Other 1,774 2,671
Equity 1,985 3,042
-------- --------
$ 25,141 $ 20,775
======== ========
</TABLE>
(1) Balance sheets exclude $44.5 million of notes due to the Operating
Partnership which, under the equity method, are eliminated for purposes
of carry-over basis accounting.
Combined summarized income statement information for the Property Service
Businesses follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------- June 30, 1994 to
1996 1995 December 31, 1994
--------- ----------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 62,559 $ 58,777 $28,245
Operating expense 53,245 49,925 23,469
Depreciation/amortization 1,056 1,325 560
Other expense, net 391 647 418
-------- -------- -------
Net income(1) $ 7,867 $ 6,880 $ 3,798
======== ======== =======
</TABLE>
(1) Represents 100% of the Property Service Businesses' net income, of which the
Operating Partnership's share amounted to $7.8 million, $6.9 million and $3.8
million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the
period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994.
F-14
<PAGE>
5. DEFERRED CHARGES
Deferred charges consist of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Permanent loan fees $ 19,917 $ 20,257
Retail lease acquisition costs 3,693 3,579
Acquisition/development costs and other 1,729 454
-------- --------
25,339 24,290
Less: Accumulated amortization 7,693 5,508
-------- --------
$ 17,646 $ 18,782
======== ========
</TABLE>
Amortization expense of the Operating Partnership was $2.9 million and $3.1
million for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and $1.3
million for the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994. Amortization
expense for the CES Group was $0.7 million for the period from January 1, 1994
to June 29, 1994.
6. MORTGAGE LOANS
The Operating Partnership, through its subsidiary financing partnerships, has
mortgage loans consisting of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Mortgage Pool One $ 110,140 $ 110,140
Mortgage Pool Two 125,214 125,214
Mortgage Pool Three 117,000 117,000
Mortgage Pool Four 31,095 31,141
Acquisition Mortgages 33,359 30,478
--------- ---------
$ 416,808 $ 413,973
========= =========
</TABLE>
These loans require monthly interest and, where applicable, principal
payments and are collateralized by non-recourse first lien mortgages or deeds of
trust on 33 of the 43 Properties, bear interest at a weighted-average interest
rate of 8.01% and 8.13% as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and have
a weighted-average maturity of 7.2 years.
The loan for Mortgage Pool One bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.0% and is
due June 30, 1999. The loan for Mortgage Pool Two bears interest at a fixed rate
of 8.3% and is due June 30, 2001. Both loans are interest only and require the
Operating Partnership to establish escrows to fund capital improvements and
repairs, and to maintain minimum cash balances for interest and ground rent
payments. The loans for Mortgage Pools One and Two contain cross collateral and
cross default provisions among the separate financing partnership borrowers
within each pool.
F-15
<PAGE>
The loan for Mortgage Pool Three is interest only, at a fixed rate of 7.99%
paid monthly, through June 30, 1999, at which time principal amortization begins
using a 25-year amortization schedule with a balloon payment due June 30, 2009.
The loan requires a capital and repair escrow. Certain Predecessor partners
guarantee $42 million of the mortgage loan secured by Mortgage Pool Three.
In September 1996, the outstanding loan balance of $40.6 million for Mortgage
Pool Four was refinanced for a new loan amount of $41 million. The ground lessor
(see Note 8) has been allocated $9.9 million of the refinanced loan for which
the Operating Partnership is contingently liable. The remaining $31.1 million of
debt is allocated to the Operating Partnership. The loan bears interest at a
fixed rate of 8.24%, paid monthly through August, 2004, at which time principal
amortization begins, using a 30-year amortization schedule with a final payment
due August 1, 2009.
In connection with two of the 1995 acquisitions discussed in Note 3, the
Operating Partnership assumed a mortgage loan of $17.5 million with an interest
rate of LIBOR plus 170 basis points (7.2% as of December 31, 1996) due June 30,
1997, and a $13.1 million mortgage loan with a fixed interest rate of 7.5% with
principal amortized over 25 years and a final payment due October 31, 2020. In
connection with one of the 1996 acquisitions, the Operating Partnership assumed
a $3.3 million mortgage loan with a fixed interest rate of 9.0% with principal
amortized using a 29-year amortization schedule and a final payment due August
1, 1999. The mortgage loans are collateralized by the respective properties.
(See Footnote 15 for disclosures on subsequent events).
The scheduled principal payments for all of the mortgage loans are as follows
(in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ending
December 31,
------------
<S> <C>
1997 $ 17,483
1998 257
1999 114,559
2000 1,873
2001 127,241
Thereafter 155,395
---------
$ 416,808
=========
</TABLE>
F-16
<PAGE>
7. NOTES PAYABLE
The Operating Partnership, through its subsidiary financing partnerships, has
notes payable consisting of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
$100 million Acquisition Line of Credit $ 82,050 $ 52,550
$83 million Acquisition Line of Credit 30,000 --
Construction Loan 17,686 16,654
-------- --------
$129,736 $ 69,204
======== ========
</TABLE>
The Operating Partnership has a $100 million revolving line of credit on
which borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.625% (7.155% at December 31,
1996). The line of credit matures on June 30, 1997 with two one-year extension
options exercisable by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership pays
a fee of .125% on any unused portions of the line of credit. Borrowings under
the line of credit are collateralized by 7 of the 43 Properties. The line of
credit agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance
of minimum net worth, debt to equity ratios and cash flow coverage requirements.
The maximum amounts outstanding during each year never exceeded the December 31
balances.
During 1996, the Operating Partnership obtained an additional $83 million
acquisition credit facility with a term of eight and one half years. The line of
credit provides for an interest rate that is fixed at the time of each borrowing
at 150 basis points over a pre-determined Treasury index and is cross-
collateralized with Mortgage Pool Three (Note 6). Borrowings outstanding at
December 31, 1996 bear interest at a weighted-average fixed rate of 7.27% and
are collateralized by two Properties. The agreement contains certain restrictive
covenants including a limit on debt to asset value and maintenance of debt
service coverage ratios.
In connection with the development of the Westerly at Worldgate apartments,
the Operating Partnership obtained an interest-only construction loan in 1995
with interest at LIBOR plus 180 basis points (7.32% at December 31, 1996),
payable monthly, due June 1, 1997. The loan is collateralized by the property.
Construction of the 320-unit community was completed in December, 1995. (See
Footnote 15 for disclosures on subsequent events).
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LAND LEASES
Nine of the Properties have ground leases expiring at various dates between
December, 2032 and July, 2064. Six of the ground leases are with parties who own
Operating Partnership units. Generally, each ground lease provides for a nominal
annual rental and an additional rental calculated from the results of Property
operations after capital expenditures.
F-17
<PAGE>
The base rental expense to the Operating Partnership under the ground leases
was $0.5 million for each of the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and $0.3
million for the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994. The base rental
expense for the CES Group was approximately $0.2 million for the period from
January 1, 1994 to June 29, 1994. The additional rental expense to the Operating
Partnership under the ground leases was $2.6 million and $1.8 million for the
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and $1.4 million for the
period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994. Additional rental expense to the
CES Group was approximately $1.4 million for the period from January 1, 1994 to
June 29, 1994. At the expiration of the ground leases, the land and all of the
improvements thereon will revert to the land owner. In most cases, the leases
are subordinated to the mortgage debt on the related rental property.
The future nominal base annual rentals as of December 31, 1996 for the ground
leases are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ending
December 31,
------------
<S> <C>
1997 $ 491
1998 491
1999 491
2000 491
2001 491
Thereafter 22,290
--------
$ 24,745
========
</TABLE>
LITIGATION
The Operating Partnership and/or the Property Service Businesses are presently
subject to legal actions or claims for damages that arise in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management and counsel to the Operating
Partnership, the ultimate outcome of such litigation will not have a material
adverse effect on the Operating Partnership's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
BUILDING EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN
Substantially all of the personnel employed at the residential Properties are
eligible and participate in the Charles E. Smith Building Employees Retirement
Plan, a defined contribution plan (the "Plan"). These personnel are employed by
Smith Employment Services, L.P. ("Employment Services"), a limited partnership
owned by the Operating Partnership, which is the primary employer in the Plan.
Employment Services is required to contribute 4% of employee-qualified earnings.
The total contributions were $0.3 million in both 1996 and 1995, and $0.1
million for the six months ended December 31, 1994. Prior to the business
combination, these employees were employed by the partnerships that owned the
Properties. Employees of the Property Service Businesses are covered by a
separate defined contribution tax-qualified retirement savings plan.
F-18
<PAGE>
9. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Operating Partnership conducts business with entities in which Messrs.
Smith and Kogod exercise control. The following is a description of these
transactions.
. In connection with the development of the Westerly at Worldgate apartments,
the Operating Partnership purchased the land for $4.7 million from an
affiliate controlled by Messrs. Smith and Kogod pursuant to an agreement with
the Operating Partnership at the time of the Offerings. Also, a contract was
executed with an entity controlled by Messrs. Smith and Kogod to manage the
construction of the apartments at a fee of 4% of hard construction costs.
Construction management fees were $0.5 million for the year ended December
31, 1995 and $0.2 million for the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31,
1994. The project was completed in December, 1995.
. For the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Operating Partnership
paid approximately $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in payroll
reimbursements to an entity controlled by Messrs. Smith and Kogod for initial
development efforts on development properties and potential development
sites.
. The two retail properties lease health club facilities to entities controlled
by Messrs. Smith and Kogod. Rental income earned under these leases
approximated $5.0 million, $4.8 million, and $1.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31,
1994, and $1.9 million for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 29, 1994.
The leases expire on December 31, 2015. Messrs. Smith and Kogod have
guaranteed that the tenant for one of the facilities leased in 1991 will pay
all minimum annual rent and expense pass-throughs in accordance with the
terms of the agreement through June 10, 1999. In addition, one of the retail
properties also leases health club equipment to the affiliated tenant under a
capital lease. As of December 31, 1996 and 1995, the present value of the
future minimum rental receivables approximated $0.2 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, and are included in other assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
At December 31, 1995, approximately $0.8 million was reflected in Due to
Related Parties for amounts due to Affiliates and Predecessor Partners.
F-19
<PAGE>
10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 requires disclosure about
fair value for all financial instruments. Based on the borrowing rates currently
available to the Operating Partnership for mortgages with similar terms and
remaining maturities, the fair value of mortgages payable was approximately $427
million and $459 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The fair
value of notes payable approximates the carrying value.
11. INCENTIVE PLANS
The Operating Partnership and the Company apply Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related
interpretations in accounting for their stock/unit incentive plans. Accordingly,
no compensation expense has been recognized on these plans other than for
restricted stock / unit and performance-based awards. Had compensation cost for
the other option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date
consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS 123, the Operating
Partnership's net income would have been reduced by approximately $8,000 (less
than $0.01 per unit) for the year ended December 31, 1996. The fair value of
options granted during 1996 is estimated at approximately $23,000 based on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions: dividend yield of 8.3%, volatility of 9%, risk-free interest rate
of 6.3% and an expected life of 7 years.
OPTION PLANS
The Company, with the Operating Partnership, maintains an employee stock and
unit option plan designed for executive officers and other key employees of the
Company, the Operating Partnership and the Property Service Businesses. Messrs.
Smith and Kogod are not eligible to participate under this plan. The Company
also maintains a Director's stock option plan which provides for automatic
grants of vested options, exercisable for 5,000 shares of common stock, to newly
appointed non-employee directors. The plans authorize the issuance of up to
1,750,000 shares of common stock and/or units pursuant to options granted under
these plans. Options outstanding under both plans are as follows:
F-20
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exercise
Price Per Options
Number Share/Unit Exercisable
------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Shares/units under option,
December 31, 1994 895,000 $ 24 20,000
Options granted - -
Options canceled - -
------- ------
Shares/units under option,
December 31, 1995 895,000 24 199,000
Options granted 40,000 24
Options canceled (100,000) 24
-------- ------
Shares/units under option,
December 31, 1996 835,000 $ 24 351,000
======== ====== =======
</TABLE>
The exercise price of options granted under the plans may not be less than the
fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Payment
for shares and/or units granted under the plans may be made either in cash, or,
if permitted by the option agreement, by exchanging shares of common stock of
the Company having a fair market value equal to the option exercise price.
Options granted under the employee plan have a maximum term of ten years and
vest generally in three to five equal annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary of the date of grant. As of December 31, 1996, 351,000 options had
vested. Generally, options terminate three months after the optionee's
termination of employment. The Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors may provide, however, that an option may be exercised over a longer
period following termination of employment, but in no event beyond the
expiration date of the option.
RESTRICTED STOCK AND UNIT PLAN
The Company, with the Operating Partnership, maintains a restricted stock and
unit plan for executive officers and other key employees of the Company, the
Operating Partnership and the Property Service Businesses. Messrs. Smith and
Kogod are not eligible to participate under the plan. A maximum of 300,000
shares of common stock and/or units may be issued under the plan. Restricted
shares and/or units that have not vested at the time of an employee's
termination of employment with the Company will be forfeited, except where such
termination occurs by reason of death or disability. Any restricted shares
and/or units forfeited pursuant to the vesting provisions of the plan will again
be available for award under the plan. In July 1994, 95,000 restricted units
were awarded to certain executive officers and key employees. These grants vest
in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date
of grant, subject to acceleration of vesting upon a change of control of the
Company. During 1996, 7,500 grants were canceled and 23,750 units vested. No
grants were canceled and 23,750 units vested in 1995. No grants were canceled or
vested during the period from June 30, 1994 to December 31, 1994. For the years
ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the period from June 30, 1994 to December
31, 1994, compensation expense
F-21
<PAGE>
relating to the plan was $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, based on the market value of the stock at the date of grant.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DATA
Information on non-cash investing and financing activities and cash interest
paid is as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CES Residential Realty L.P. CES Group
------------------------------------------ ------------
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
6/30/94 to 1/1/94 to
1996 1995 12/31/94 6/29/94
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash paid during the period
for interest $ 41,078 $ 35,376 $ 16,457 $ 26,536
Capitalized interest 60 675 200 -
Contribution of properties to the
Operating Partnership - - (244,208) -
Purchase of property in exchange
for Operating Partnership units 2,403 15,491 - -
Assumption of debt on acquisitions 3,260 30,618 - -
Adjustment in redemption value of
Other Limited Partners' Interest 65,252 (31,769) 551,329 -
</TABLE>
13. SEGMENT OPERATIONS
The CES Group financial statements combine the results of operations of the
Properties (the rental operations) and the Property Service Businesses
(multifamily and retail property management and leasing, engineering and
technical, interior construction and renovation, financing services, and other
services). Consequently, the following table presents operating and other
information divided between the two segments of the CES Group's business (in
thousands):
F-22
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Property
Rental Service Combined
Operations Businesses Eliminations Total
---------- ---------- ------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1994
TO JUNE 29, 1994:
Revenue $ 63,496 $ 27,792 $ - $ 91,288
Interest income 663 307 - 970
Intersegment revenue - 1,791 (1,791) -
-------- -------- --------- --------
Total revenue $ 64,159 $ 29,890 $ (1,791) $ 92,258
======== ======== ========= ========
Depreciation and amortization $ 7,897 $ 763 $ (271) $ 8,389
======== ======== ========= ========
Operating profit $ 27,171 $ 4,173 $ (119) $ 31,225
Intersegment expense (revenue) 947 (1,066) 119 -
-------- -------- --------- --------
Net profit $ 28,118 $ 3,107 $ - $ 31,225
======== ======== ========= ========
Capital expenditures $ 1,913 $ 306 $ ( 98) $ 2,121
======== ======== ========= ========
</TABLE>
14. OTHER LIMITED PARTNERS' INTEREST
Limited partnership units of the Other Limited Partners may be redeemed at the
unitholders' discretion. At the option of the Company, such redemption may be
made for cash, at the then fair value of the Company's stock, or for shares of
common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis. As of December 31, 1996,
approximately 19.1 million shares of the Company's authorized common stock had
been reserved for possible issuance upon redemption of limited partnership
units.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Other Limited
Partners redemption rights are not included in partners' equity. Consequently,
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of partners' equity
reflect the Other Limited Partners' Interest in the Operating Partnership,
measured at redemption value. Such interest is deducted from partners' equity.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Unaudited)
On February 19, 1997, the Company issued 2.7 million shares of common stock
(the Offering) at $28.375 per share for total proceeds of $72.2 million, net of
underwriting discounts and other expenses totaling $4.5 million. The Company
used the net proceeds from the Offering to purchase 2.7 million limited
partnership units of the Operating Partnership. The Operating partnership used
the resulting proceeds to repay $61.2 million of notes payable and $9 million of
mortgage debt. The balance was used to fund the property acquisitions discussed
below and for general corporate purposes.
During February and March 1997, the Operating Partnership completed the
acquisition of three multifamily properties totaling 1,828 apartment units, for
a total cost of approximately $129 million consisting of Operating Partnership
Units valued at approximately $47 million, assumed debt of approximately $80
million and cash of approximately $2 million. One of the properties is subject
to a 5.1% net profits interest in favor of an unaffiliated third party.
F-23
<PAGE>
On March 12, 1997, the underwriters of the Offering exercised their option to
purchase an additional 0.4 million shares of common stock at $28.375 per share,
less the underwriting discount. Net proceeds to the Company of $10.9 million
were used to purchase an additional 0.4 million limited partnership units of the
Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership used the resulting proceeds to
repay outstanding amounts on the lines of credit.
16. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Quarterly financial information for 1996 and 1995 is as follows (in thousands
except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
------------------------------------------------------------------
March 31, 1996 June 30, 1996 September 30,1996 December 31, 1996
-------------- ------------- ----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 39,810 $ 40,836 $ 42,894 $ 43,772
Operating expenses
(including depreciation) (23,506) (22,558) (24,027) (23,619)
Equity in income of Property
Service Businesses 1,548 1,444 1,797 3,057
Interest expense (10,411) (10,631) (11,206) (11,358)
Corporate general and
administrative expenses (745) (795) (667) (818)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 6,696 $ 8,296 $ 8,791 $ 11,034
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per unit $ .31 $ .38 $ .40 $ .50
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
-------------------------------------------------------------------
March 31, 1995 June 30, 1995 September 30, 1995 December 31, 1995
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 34,410 $ 35,069 $ 37,616 $ 39,238
Operating expenses
(including depreciation) (19,470) (19,512) (21,322) (21,581)
Equity in income of Property
Service Businesses 561 1,586 1,994 2,727
Interest expense (8,695) (8,926) (9,572) (10,228)
Corporate general and administrative
expenses (653) (770) (611) (808)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 6,153 $ 7,447 $ 8,105 $ 9,348
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per unit $ .29 $ .35 $ .37 $ .43
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-24
<PAGE>
CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,1996
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Capitalized Costs Before
Accumulated Depreciation at
Initial Cost Cost December 31, 1996
Encumbrances/ -------------------- Capitalized ---------------------------
Collateral Building and Subsequent To Building and Accumulated
Properties Pools (1) Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation
- ---------- ------------ --------------------- ------------ --------------------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Albemarle LOC $ 418 $ - $ 4,686 $ 418 $ 4,686 $ 5,104 ($3,325)
Bedford Village Two 1,062 - 12,903 1,062 12,903 13,965 (8,120)
Bennington $12,870 6,922 22,645 88 6,922 22,733 29,655 (712)
Berkeley Three 108 - 1,910 108 1,910 2,018 (1,450)
Boulevard of Old Town - 2,653 4,269 2,302 2,653 6,571 9,224 (230)
Calvert-Woodley Three 172 - 2,449 172 2,449 2,621 (1,758)
Car Barn Two 3,576 - 13,426 3,576 13,426 17,002 (4,817)
Charter Oaks (2) LOC 4,387 10,280 354 4,387 10,634 15,021 (226)
Cleveland House Three 325 - 4,067 325 4,067 4,392 (2,832)
Columbia Crossing Three 4,701 - 18,330 4,701 18,330 23,031 (3,666)
Columbian-Stratford One 242 - 4,426 242 4,426 4,668 (3,169)
Concord Village Two - - 8,523 - 8,523 8,523 (5,437)
Connecticut Heights $17,245 6,956 18,695 643 6,956 19,338 26,294 (724)
Corcoran House One 230 - 1,979 230 1,979 2,209 (1,544)
Courthouse Plaza Three - - 44,121 - 44,121 44,121 (9,817)
Crystal House I One - - 10,123 - 10,123 10,123 (5,922)
Crystal House II One - - 9,095 - 9,095 9,095 (5,785)
Crystal Place Two 1,245 - 18,658 1,245 18,658 19,903 (6,055)
Crystal Square Two - - 14,465 - 14,465 14,465 (7,786)
1841 Columbia Road(2) $ 3,245 3,611 1,873 4 3,611 1,877 5,488 (20)
Executive Central Two 262 - 4,432 262 4,432 4,694 (3,374)
Executive North One 245 - 4,871 245 4,871 5,116 (3,843)
Executive South Two 303 - 3,849 303 3,849 4,152 (3,089)
Fort Chaplin Two 97 - 7,715 97 7,715 7,812 (5,750)
Gateway Place Three 1,660 - 17,564 1,660 17,564 19,224 (4,737)
Manor LOC 5,809 14,807 1,203 5,809 16,010 21,819 (957)
Marbury Plaza One - - 10,099 - 10,099 10,099 (7,171)
Newport Village Two/Three 281 - 15,922 281 15,922 16,203 (8,696)
Oakwood - 3,819 12,551 143 3,819 12,694 16,513 (321)
Orleans Village Two 700 - 13,255 700 13,255 13,955 (8,759)
Oxford Manor One 290 - 3,140 290 3,140 3,430 (2,150)
Patriot Village $31,095 - - 28,126 - 28,126 28,126 (14,075)
Potomac View LOC 2,520 6,393 417 2,520 6,810 9,330 (419)
Skyline Mall Three 482 - 14,476 482 14,476 14,958 (7,347)
Skyline Towers One 360 - 24,687 360 24,687 25,047 (14,901)
Statesman One 600 - 4,187 600 4,187 4,787 (3,382)
Suburban Tower LOC 1,815 5,239 (137) 1,815 5,102 6,917 (248)
2501 Porter Street Three 1,126 - 18,194 1,126 18,194 19,320 (4,451)
Van Ness LOC 12,699 29,973 13 12,699 29,986 42,685 (312)
Water Park Towers One 2,500 - 41,717 2,500 41,717 44,217 (9,151)
Westerly (3) 17,686 4,700 19,244 260 4,700 19,504 24,204 (612)
Windsor Towers One 362 - 5,421 362 5,421 5,783 (3,823)
Worldgate Centre LOC 4,105 - 40,582 4,105 40,582 44,687 (8,944)
-------------------------- -------------------------------------- ----------- ---------
$ 81,343 $145,969 $432,688 $81,343 $578,657 $660,000 ($189,907)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Date of Date Depreciable
Properties Property Construction Acquired Lives
- ---------- ------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Albemarle $1,779 1966 - 5 - 40 years
Bedford Village 5,845 1967 - 5 - 40 years
Bennington 28,943 - 1995 5 - 40 years
Berkeley 568 1961 - 5 - 40 years
Boulevard of Old Town 8,994 - 1995 5 - 40 years
Calvert-Woodley 863 1962 - 5 - 40 years
Car Barn 12,185 1982/1986 - 5 - 40 years
Charter Oaks (2) 14,795 1970 1996 5 - 40 years
Cleveland House 1,560 1962 - 5 - 40 years
Columbia Crossing 19,365 1990/1991 - 5 - 40 years
Columbian-Stratford 1,499 1959 - 5 - 40 years
Concord Village 3,086 1967 - 5 - 40 years
Connecticut Heights 25,570 - 1995 5 - 40 years
Corcoran House 665 1961 - 5 - 40 years
Courthouse Plaza 34,304 1988/1990 - 5 - 40 years
Crystal House I 4,201 1969 - 5 - 40 years
Crystal House II 3,310 1964 - 5 - 40 years
Crystal Place 13,848 1986 - 5 - 40 years
Crystal Square 6,679 1975 - 5 - 40 years
1841 Columbia Road(2) 5,468 1923 1996 5 - 40 years
Executive Central 1,320 1960 - 5 - 40 years
Executive North 1,273 1960 - 5 - 40 years
Executive South 1,063 1960 - 5 - 40 years
Fort Chaplin 2,062 1963 - 5 - 40 years
Gateway Place 14,487 1987 - 5 - 40 years
Manor 20,862 - 1994 5 - 40 years
Marbury Plaza 2,928 1966 - 5 - 40 years
Newport Village 7,507 1971 - 5 - 40 years
Oakwood 16,192 - 1995 5 - 40 years
Orleans Village 5,196 1965/1966 - 5 - 40 years
Oxford Manor 1,280 1967 - 5 - 40 years
Patriot Village 14,051 1973/1975/1977 - 5 - 40 years
Potomac View 8,911 - 1994 5 - 40 years
Skyline Mall 7,611 1977 - 5 - 40 years
Skyline Towers 10,146 1972 - 5 - 40 years
Statesman 1,405 1961 - 5 - 40 years
Suburban Tower 6,669 - 1995 5 - 40 years
2501 Porter Street 14,869 1987/1988 - 5 - 40 years
Van Ness 42,373 1970 1996 5 - 40 years
Water Park Towers 35,066 1989 - 5 - 40 years
Westerly (3) 23,592 1995 - 5 - 40 years
Windsor Towers 1,960 1965 - 5 - 40 years
Worldgate Centre 35,743 1990 - 5 - 40 years
---------
$470,093
</TABLE>
(1) Encumbrances include $352.4 million of mortgage loans collateralized
by three separate pools, and $112.1 million drawn on the Operating
Partnership's lines of credit ("LOC") collateralized by the
properties noted. As of December 31, 1996, the mortgage loan
balances relating to Mortgage Pool One ("One"), Mortgage Pool Two
("Two"), and Mortgage Pool Three ("Three") are $110,140, $125,214,
and $117,000 respectively.
(2) 1841 Columbia Road was acquired in exchange for Operating
Partnership units valued at $1,891 and the assumption of an
existing mortgage of approximately $3,260. Charter Oaks was
acquired in exchange for Operating Partnership units valued at
$513.
(3) Encumbrance represents the balance at December 31, 1996 of a
construction loan collateralized by the property.
<PAGE>
The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes of the Operating
Partnership's investment in real estate was approximately $652.4 million and
$577.6 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The changes in total
real estate and accumulated depreciation for the three years ended December 31
are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Real Estate Assets
--------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, beginning of year $ 587,114 $ 471,920 $ 437,019
Acquisitions 65,836 110,487 29,394
Improvements 7,425 4,709 5,507
Retirements and write-offs (375) (2) -
--------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, end of year $ 660,000 $ 587,114 $ 471,920
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accumulated Depreciation
--------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, beginning of year $ 172,624 $ 156,707 $ 141,475
Depreciation expense 17,658 15,917 15,232
Retirements and write-offs (375) - -
--------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, end of year $ 189,907 $ 172,624 $ 156,707
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
S-2
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L. P.
Name State of Incorporation/Formation
- ---- --------------------------------
Smith Property Holdings One L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings One (D.C.) L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Crystal Towers L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Two L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Two (D.C.) L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Three L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Three (D.C.) L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Four L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Kenmore L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Five L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Five (D.C.) L.P. Delaware
First Herndon Associates Limited Partnership Virginia
Smith Property Holdings Six L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Six (D.C.) L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Van Ness L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Columbia Road L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Seven L.P. Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Crystal Plaza L.L.C. Delaware
Metropolitan Acquisition Finance L.P. Delaware
Smith Employment Services L.P. Delaware
Smith Realty Company Maryland
Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. Maryland
Smith Management Construction, Inc. Maryland
Charles E. Smith Insurance Agency, Inc. District of Columbia
E-1
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in this Form 10-K into Charles E. Smith
Residential Realty L.P.'s previously filed Registration Statement No. 33-82382.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Washington, D.C.
March 27, 1997
E-2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 3,898
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 0
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 9,608
<PP&E> 660,000
<DEPRECIATION> (189,907)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 522,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 13,046
<BONDS> 546,544
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> (37,379)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 522,211
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 166,283
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 93,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 3,025
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 42,577
<INCOME-PRETAX> 34,817
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 34,817
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 34,817
<EPS-PRIMARY> 1.59
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.59
</TABLE>
