<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to ____________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-23466
SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
WASHINGTON 91-1603837
---------- ----------
(State of organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
1155 Valley Street, Suite 400, Seattle, Washington 98109
--------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (206) 624-8100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
- ------------------- -----------------------------------------
Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Share Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange
8.8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
par value $.001 per share New York Stock Exchange
8.7% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
par value $.001 per share New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant
as of February 26, 1999: $681,267,369
<PAGE> 2
Class A Common Stock outstanding as of February 26, 1999: 28,825,080 shares
Class B Common Stock outstanding as of February 26, 1999: 154,604 shares
Documents incorporated by reference: Part III is incorporated by reference from
the Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our Annual Shareholders
Meeting to be held May 11, 1999.
There are 83 pages.
-2-
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1 - BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (the Company or SSCI) is a fully
integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust
(REIT) that develops, acquires, owns and manages self storage centers. Our self
storage centers offer easily accessible storage space for personal and business
uses. We are one of the four largest operators of self storage centers in the
United States. We own and operate, as of December 31, 1998, directly and through
joint ventures, 318 properties (including 316 self-storage properties),
containing approximately 20.5 million net rentable square feet. Of the 318
properties, 302 are located in 20 states in the U.S., and 16 are located in
Europe. We also manage for third parties, 29 self storage centers and one
business park containing approximately 1.6 million net rentable square feet. For
the year ended December 31, 1998, our self storage centers had a weighted
average annual net rentable square foot occupancy rate of 84% and a weighted
average rent per net rentable square foot of $9.90.
We were incorporated in Delaware on July 23, 1993 and began
operations through the consolidation on March 1, 1994 of 17 publicly held real
estate limited partnerships (the Consolidation) that were sponsored by Shurgard
Incorporated (the Management Company). On March 24, 1995, the Management Company
merged with and into the Company (the Merger) and we became self-administered
and self-managed. On November 14, 1996, we completed the purchase of
IDS/Shurgard Income Growth Partners L.P., IDS/Shurgard Income Growth Partners
L.P. II, and IDS/Shurgard Income Growth Partners L.P. III (the IDS
Partnerships), affiliated partnerships whose properties were previously managed
by the Company. These acquisitions added 37 properties totaling 2.3 million net
rentable square feet to our portfolio.
In May 1997, the Company reincorporated in the state of Washington
to reduce costs.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our mission is to become the global leader in storage products and
services by (i) emphasizing customer service and satisfaction, (ii) maintaining
a portfolio of convenient and secure stores, (iii) optimizing revenue through
efficient rent pricing and collection policies, (iv) pursuing on-going market
research and marketing programs, and (v) integrating our property management
systems and procedures. Of these factors, the most important is the quality of
our employees' interaction with customers.
-3-
<PAGE> 4
Commitment to Customer Service and Satisfaction
Our goal is to achieve a high level of customer satisfaction, and we
view the quality of customers' interaction with employees as critical to our
long-term success. Accordingly, we emphasize teamwork in our employee training
programs. Through our emphasis on training, personnel development and
decentralized decision-making, we believe we attract well-qualified, highly
motivated employees committed to providing superior levels of customer service.
Convenient and Secure Stores
Our stores are located for easy access, offer a range of storage
products and services for customer convenience, and emphasize security and
product quality. We believe that our strategy of offering high-quality,
convenient stores strengthens the brand image of Shurgard, attracts customers
and enables the Company to maintain premium rents.
- - Store Location and Hours. Our stores are generally located in major
metropolitan areas along retail and high-traffic corridors for easy
customer access, and usually have significant road frontage for high
visibility. Although hours vary from store to store, customers can
generally access their individual units between 6 a.m. and 9 p.m.
- - One-Stop Convenience. Our stores offer a range of storage products and
ancillary services, including supplies such as packing and storage
materials, locks and boxes, as well as services such as property insurance
referrals, moving company referrals, and Ryder truck rentals that
conveniently and efficiently address customers' storage needs. In
addition, we generally offer premium features such as computer-controlled
access and electronic security systems. Finally, a number of our stores
offer climate-controlled storage space.
- - Property Security. A variety of measures are used at our stores, as
appropriate, to enhance security. Such measures may include, among others,
on-site personnel, electronic devices such as intrusion and fire alarms,
access controls, video and intercom surveillance devices, individual unit
alarms, perimeter beams, fencing and lighting. Customers are assigned a
designated personal identification number for use in connection with a
computerized gate access system. Each access is logged into a computer
database. In addition, we have developed and plan to continue to improve
our package of security controls, including software, video and
interactive communication.
- - Capital Expenditures and Maintenance. We budget for a level of capital
expenditures consistent with our commitment to maintaining attractive,
well-maintained and secure self storage centers, which enables us to
pursue a premium pricing strategy. In addition, capital expenditures for
consistent signage and color scheme among our properties strengthens the
brand image of Shurgard. (See Item 7 - Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Capital
Expenditures)
-4-
<PAGE> 5
Selective Disposition. We regularly review our portfolio compared to
established internal standards, identify those few properties which can
not meet these standards and dispose of such properties. We intend to
continue this policy.
Marketing and Market Research
We employ various means to increase our share of the self storage
market. We place prominent advertisements in the yellow pages and seek to
promote customer awareness of our stores through highly visible store locations,
site signage and architectural features. We locate our stores along retail and
high-traffic corridors, usually with significant road frontage to increase
visibility. We build on newly developed stores a distinctive "lighthouse" office
to distinguish ourself from competitors and to increase customer awareness of
the Shurgard brand.
Primary marketing emphasis is placed on providing managers with
telephone sales skills to elicit customer needs and turn prospects into
customers. We also have a national call center to field overflow calls from
individual properties. Employees at the national call center are able to rent a
unit at the store most convenient to the customer.
We maintain an extensive market research database on our primary
markets and closely track occupancy levels, rental rates and other operational
data regarding self storage properties within these markets. We have also
conducted focus group research and telephone surveys, and utilize customer
comment cards to identify the primary considerations in customers' self storage
choices and satisfaction so that we can better attract and service customers.
During 1997, we began to experiment with a new marketing strategy to
make storage more convenient and visible to potential customers through the
addition of Shurgard Storage Stops in major malls. These kiosks, which are sales
counters located in the center of malls, are staffed with trained sales
representatives who are available to answer questions about both self storage
and containerized storage, meaning storage containers that are transported to
and from the customer's home or office. The sales representatives have computer
links to area storage centers so that they can give rate and availability
information and lease units or containers to customers on the spot. We currently
have five kiosks in three key markets: Portland, Chicago, and the Seattle
metropolitan area.
Property Management Systems/Management Information Systems
We have integrated property management systems and procedures for
marketing, advertising, leasing, operations, maintenance and security of
properties and the management of on-site personnel. Our computerized management
information system links our corporate office with each store. During 1997, we
completed the development and installation of proprietary software that
expedites internal auditing, financial statement and budget preparations, allows
the daily exchange of information with our corporate office, and manages
detailed information with respect to the tenant mix, demographics, occupancy
levels, rental rates, revenue optimization, payroll and other information
relating to each store. Additionally, we purchased a new network-based
accounting package that has aided in the compilation and dissemination of
information from and to our stores. During 1998, as part of our move to our new
corporate offices, we installed an enterprise wide-area network and remote
access capability. We believe that this new information system will be adequate
to support the management of our currently owned properties as well as planned
future growth.
-5-
<PAGE> 6
Other Activities
The Company also manages, under the Shurgard name, self storage
properties owned by others that meet our quality standards. Management of such
properties enables us to spread the cost of overhead over a greater number of
properties. Additionally, it enables us to expand our presence in the markets in
which we operate, to offer customers a broader geographic selection of self
storage properties to suit their needs and to establish relationships with
property owners that may lead to future acquisitions. Management fees earned by
the Company are not qualifying income for REIT qualification purposes.
Accordingly, we closely monitor the level of these activities to ensure our
continued qualification as a REIT.
-6-
<PAGE> 7
For financial information about industry segments, see the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, including NOTE M. For
financial information about foreign and domestic operations, see the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, including NOTE F.
GROWTH STRATEGIES
Our growth strategies are designed to maximize shareholder value by
increasing funds from operations through increases in revenue and operating
efficiencies at existing stores and the development of new self storage
properties and the acquisition of additional self storage properties. We have an
integrated real estate and storage operations management team which combines its
experience to implement our growth plan. We believe that the experience of our
management team in operating, developing and acquiring self storage properties
and our access to capital markets strongly contribute to our ability to execute
these strategies.
Internal Growth Strategy
Our internal growth strategy is to increase same store cash flow by
achieving the highest rental rate structure consistent with strong occupancy
rates, containing costs and improving operating leverage, and undertaking
expansion of our existing stores.
- - Revenue Optimization. We seek to optimize our revenue by achieving the
highest rental rate structure for our stores, consistent with strong
levels of occupancy, through the use of teams of store employees who are
trained and authorized to set rental rates and make rental rate changes
based on their analysis of demand and availability at a particular store.
We encourage decentralized decisions by store managers to change marginal
rental rates in order to ensure a fast, flexible response to changing
market conditions. Store managers evaluate their property's rental rates
on a periodic basis, based on unit demand and unit availability, and can
quickly change marginal rental rates to ensure that revenue is optimized.
- - Cost Containment and Improved Operating Leverage. We seek to maximize cash
flow by carefully containing operating expenses. For example, we
aggressively appeal our real estate tax assessments. In addition, as we
increase the number of properties in our targeted markets, we achieve
larger economies of scale and lessen the impact of corporate overhead
expense. We believe that our management and operational procedures, which
can be implemented over a large number of properties, enable us to add new
properties with little additional overhead expense.
- - Strategic Build-Outs. We seek to maximize revenue by building out
additional rentable storage space at suitable stores either through on
site expansion or acquisition of property adjacent to existing stores. We
receive high incremental returns on such build-out investments, because
resulting revenue increases are achieved with little increase in fixed
operating costs.
External Growth Strategy
Our external growth strategy is to develop new, high-quality self
storage properties and to selectively acquire additional self storage properties
that meet or can be upgraded to our standards. In general, we plan to develop or
acquire new properties primarily in our existing markets and in new markets that
create economies of scale with our current network of stores. We seek to own at
least 15 stores in each of our markets in order to realize operating and
marketing efficiencies and increase brand awareness. We believe that the
experience of our management team in developing and acquiring self storage
properties strengthens our ability to pursue our external growth strategy.
-7-
<PAGE> 8
We favor development or acquisition of self storage properties in
major metropolitan markets, located near retail or high-traffic corridors,
usually with significant road frontage to increase visibility. We rely on our
market personnel to target areas in which to develop and acquire new stores. We
utilize our staff of real estate professionals in various markets to develop and
acquire new stores in the markets presenting the best opportunities. We have
developed comprehensive market expansion plans for each of our target markets,
and use these plans as the basis for selecting new store locations and
acquisition targets. The market expansion plans utilize a demographic analysis
of an area along with an evaluation of competitors' locations, rates and product
quality to determine the optimum number and location of new stores. Management
believes that, under current market conditions, development will generally
provide superior long-term returns when compared to acquisitions of similar
size, quality and location. Based on this belief, our current growth plan
focuses heavily on property development; however, management continually
analyzes market conditions and acquisition opportunities.
Development. We believe that several factors favor our development strategy:
- - Development Expertise. We have substantial construction management and
architectural experience that was acquired over the past 26 years. Along
with our predecessors, we developed more than a third of the properties we
currently own or manage, and, since 1972, we have maintained an internal
development staff, which currently employs 56 people including both
domestic and foreign personnel.
- - Strategic Site Selection to Maximize Revenue. To obtain the best store
locations, we target sites for development in urban areas and up-scale
retail areas that often require rezoning and other complex development
measures. We believe that the difficulties of developing storage
properties in such in-fill areas may discourage competitors from locating
nearby and, as a result, enable us to operate in underserved areas. This
in turn enables us to charge higher rental rates.
- - Focus on Quality and Brand Image Development. We have greater control of
quality and brand image by developing our own self storage properties.
This enables us to focus on excellent construction and a consistent and
inviting building design. We believe our focus on quality and consistency
will enable us to further strengthen awareness of the Shurgard brand,
obtain repeat business, maintain premium prices and differentiate ourself
from our competitors.
The historical results of recent development partnerships sponsored
by the Management Company demonstrate the level of superior returns possible
through development. The development properties completed from 1989 to 1995 are
currently returning 15% on original property costs. There can be no assurance,
however, that we will achieve such returns on our more recently opened
development properties. Future development may differ materially from results of
past development properties. Factors that may lead to different results include,
but are not limited to, the possibility of more competition to our new
developments than was experienced in the periods in which these partnerships
were renting up their developments, the quality and location of the competing
projects being built, and the possibility that the metropolitan markets in which
we are developing may have less favorable supply and demand characteristics.
Acquisitions. We also selectively acquire high-quality properties
that provide a strategic advantage to us. Additional acquisitions allow us to
spread overhead and certain management, marketing and advertising costs over a
greater number of revenue-producing assets. As a result, we can achieve
increasing economies of scale with each new property acquired. We complete a
thorough analysis of each property that we intend to acquire, including, but not
limited to, a review
-8-
<PAGE> 9
of capital expenditures that will be required for the property to meet our
standards and, at a minimum, a Phase I environmental assessment report.
Shurgard Storage To Go, Inc. (STG) Our customer service focus means
that we are continually exploring new ways to serve our customers' storage
needs. One of the ways we have broadened our ability to meet customer needs is
by bringing storage directly to the customer through containerized storage with
our Shurgard Storage To Go joint venture. Weatherized 8'x5'x8' storage
containers are delivered to customers for packing. The containers are then
picked up and delivered to a warehouse for storage. The customer may access
their storage container in a showroom at the warehouse or have it redelivered to
their home. In addition to the monthly rental charge, service fees may be
charged for transportation of the container. This business venture is currently
operating in the Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Atlanta, and Chicago markets.
As of December 31, 1998, we had invested $4.5 million in Shurgard
Storage to Go, Inc. (STG). We have committed to lend up to $9 million under an
unsecured five year note of which $6.3 million was outstanding at December 31,
1998. Additionally, we have guaranteed $12.8 million in lease obligations. We
own only nonvoting stock in this start-up venture, which is not a qualified REIT
subsidiary and is subject to corporate level tax.
CAPITAL STRATEGY
During the past year, there has been a net outflow of capital from
the REIT sector which has resulted in depressed common equity prices for many
REITs, including us. As a result, we do not believe it is an attractive time to
raise common equity. Accordingly, we anticipate funding 1999 growth and our
on-going development program primarily through a combination of our lines of
credit, long term debt, preferred equity, and alternative capital sources. We
intend to pursue joint ventures with private institutions and public pension
funds to provide these alternative sources of capital. Additionally, we
anticipate reducing our payout ratio in order to retain cash flow for growth.
To fund development and acquisitions, we have a revolving domestic
credit facility of up to $150 million. Our European subsidiary plans to finance
growth through a combination of equity and debt financing primarily through a
joint venture in which we have a 9.15% interest. (See discussion in Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations-European Operations.)-We anticipate that cash flow from operating
activities will continue to provide adequate capital for debt service payments
until maturity, as well as for distribution payments in accordance with REIT
requirements. We anticipate refinancing outstanding debt upon maturity through
long-term debt or equity or some combination thereof.
Under our Bylaws, subject to certain exceptions, we may not incur
debt if, after giving effect to such borrowing, our Indebtedness for borrowed
funds would exceed 50% of our Total Assets or 300% of our Adjusted Net Worth (as
such terms are defined in the Bylaws). As of December 31, 1998, our Indebtedness
was approximately 34% of our Total Assets and approximately 54% of our Adjusted
Net Worth.
During 1997, in order to mitigate our currency exchange and interest
rate risk, the Board of Directors authorized us to contract with financial
institutions for hedging, exchanging, or entering into one or more swap
transactions up to the full amount of capital used outside the United States.
Our policy specifically prohibits us from entering into any such contract solely
to secure profit by speculating on the direction of currency exchange rates if
unrelated to capital borrowed, lent or invested by us.
-9-
<PAGE> 10
THE SELF STORAGE INDUSTRY
The self storage industry serves an important function in the
commercial and residential real estate markets. Self-storage properties were
first developed in the early 1960's in the southwestern United States in
response to the growing need for low-cost, accessible storage. A number of
factors accelerated the demand for low-cost storage, including, among others, a
more mobile society, with individuals moving to new homes and new cities needing
short-term storage for their belongings, the increasing cost of housing
(resulting in smaller houses), the increased popularity of apartments and
condominiums, more individuals with growing discretionary income (resulting in
the purchase of items such as boats and recreational vehicles that cannot be
stored at residences), the growing number of small businesses and the escalating
cost of other storage alternatives. As the demand for such storage increased,
and the acceptance of self storage became more widespread, self storage
properties were built throughout the United States. Generally, such properties
were constructed along major thoroughfares that provided ready access and public
visibility or in outlying areas where land was inexpensive. In certain areas of
the country, where new construction was impractical because of construction
costs, lack of suitable sites or other restrictions, older structures have been
converted into self storage properties.
We believe, based on our experience, that the self storage industry
is characterized by fragmented ownership, high gross margins, low levels of
price sensitivity and increasing customer demand. Typical customers of a self
storage property include individuals, ranging from homeowners to college
students, and commercial users, such as sales representatives and distributors,
who require frequent access, and business owners requiring seasonal storage. A
single customer rarely occupies more than 1% or 2% of the net rentable area in
any particular store.
Capital expenditures are generally less for self storage properties
as compared to other types of commercial real estate due to the properties'
structural simplicity and durable materials and the lack of tenant improvement
demands. Capital expenditures include periodic expenditures for replacing roofs
and pavement, as well as improvements such as expansions and unit
reconfigurations. Expense items include repairing asphalt, doors, fences and
masonry walls, maintaining landscaping, and repairing damage caused by customer
vehicles. Minimal maintenance is required to a storage unit when vacated to
prepare it for the next customer.
COMPETITION
Competition exists in every market in which our stores are located.
We compete with, among others, national, regional and local self storage
operators and developers. The primary factors on which competition is based are
location, rental rates, security, suitability of the property's design to
prospective tenants' needs and the manner in which the property is operated and
marketed. We believe that the primary competition for potential customers of any
of our self storage centers comes from other self storage properties within a
five-mile radius of that store. We have positioned our stores within their
respective markets as a high-quality operator that emphasizes customer service
and security. We do not seek to be the lowest-price storage provider.
Entry into the self storage business through acquisition of existing
properties is relatively easy for persons or institutions with the required
initial capital. Some of our competitors may have more resources than the
Company. Competition may be accelerated by any increase in availability of funds
for investment in real estate. Decreases in interest rates tend to increase the
availability of funds and therefore can increase the growth of competition. Due
to increased new supply in the last few years, we anticipate that increased
available storage space will continue to reduce occupancy
-10-
<PAGE> 11
levels per storage property in certain markets in 1999 and further intensify
competition among storage providers for available tenants in those markets. The
extent to which we are affected by competition will depend in significant part
on local market conditions. We are beginning to see a slowing in development
starts due to a decline in the amount of available capital and we may begin to
see a slowing of the number of storage sites opening at the end of 1999 and in
2000.
REGULATION
Environmental Regulations
The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental
regulations that apply to the ownership, management and development of real
property, including regulations affecting both construction activities and the
operation of self storage properties.
In developing properties and constructing improvements, we utilize
environmental consultants and/or governmental data to determine whether there
are any flood plains, wetlands or environmentally sensitive areas that are part
of the property to be developed. If any such areas are identified, development
and construction are planned in conformance with federal, state, and local
environmental and land-use requirements.
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and
regulations, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the
costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances released on or
in its property. Such laws may impose liability without regard to whether the
owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous
substances. The presence of hazardous substances on a property may adversely
affect the owner's ability to sell the property or to borrow using the property
as collateral, and may cause the owner or manager of the property to incur
substantial remediation costs. In addition to claims for cleanup costs, the
presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in the owner or
manager incurring substantial liabilities as a result of a claim by a private
party for personal injury or a claim by an adjacent property owner for property
damage.
We have notified the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR)
of elevated levels of (hydrocarbons) found in groundwater monitoring wells on a
property in St. Louis, Missouri. We have been monitoring in accordance with a
work plan approved by the MDNR. During 1998, a quarterly monitoring report
revealed continued contamination in the groundwater samples. The source of the
contamination is still unknown. The MDNR has notified us that it will continue
requiring quarterly groundwater monitoring. In the event the MDNR elects to be
more aggressive in the future, it may require off-site delineation of the
groundwater contaminant plume and construction of a groundwater/soil-vapor
extraction remediation system. Except for this property in St. Louis, we have
not been notified by any governmental authority of any current, material
environmental noncompliance, claim or liability in connection with any of the
properties we own or manage. We have not been notified of a current claim for
personal injury or property damage by a private party in connection with
environmental conditions at any of our properties. We have obtained a Phase I
environmental assessment report prepared by an independent environmental
consultant for each of the properties we own.
We are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to the
properties we own or manage including the Missouri property discussed above,
that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results
of operations. We cannot give assurance however, that any environmental
assessments undertaken with respect to the properties have revealed all
potential environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of the
properties did not create any
-11-
<PAGE> 12
material environmental condition not known to us, or that an environmental
condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of the properties that
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operation. In addition, we cannot give assurance that (i) future laws,
ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability,
(ii) the current environmental condition of our owned or managed properties will
not be affected by the condition of properties in the vicinity of such
properties (such as the presence of leaking underground storage tanks) or by
third parties unrelated to us, or (iii) tenants will not violate their leases by
introducing hazardous or toxic substances into our owned or managed properties
that could expose us to liability under federal or state environmental laws.
Americans With Disabilities Act; Fire and Safety Regulations
Under the ADA, all public accommodations are required to meet
certain federal requirements relating to physical access and use by disabled
persons. Compliance might require, among other things, removal of access
barriers. A determination that we are not in compliance with the ADA could
result in the imposition of fines, injunctive relief, damages or attorneys'
fees. If we were required to make modifications to comply with the ADA, our
ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders could be adversely
affected; however, management believes that such effect would not be material.
In addition, we are required to operate our properties in compliance with fire
and safety regulations, building codes and other land use regulations, as they
may be adopted by governmental agencies and bodies and become applicable to our
properties. Compliance with such requirements may require substantial capital
expenditures, which would reduce money otherwise available for distribution to
shareholders.
INSURANCE
We believe that our self storage properties are covered by adequate
fire, flood, wind, earthquake and property insurance, as well as business
interruption insurance, provided by reputable companies and with commercially
reasonable deductibles and limits. We purchase title insurance on all of our
properties at the time of acquisition. We use our discretion in determining
amounts, coverage limits and deductibility provisions of title, casualty and
other insurance, based on the purchase price paid for such property, in each
case with a view to obtaining appropriate insurance coverage on our properties
at a reasonable cost and on suitable terms.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1998, the Company employed approximately 980
persons including both domestic and foreign personnel. None of our employees are
covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relations with
our employees are good.
-12-
<PAGE> 13
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POSITIONS AND OFFICES
NAME AGE WITH THE COMPANY
- ---------------- --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Charles K. Barbo 57 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Harrell Beck 42 Director, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
David K. Grant 45 Executive Vice President
Michael Rowe 42 Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
Kristin H. Stred 40 Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
</TABLE>
For Mr. Barbo's and Mr. Beck's biographies, see our proxy statement for
the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 11, 1999.
David K. Grant has served as our Executive Vice President and
Director of Real Estate Investment since July 1993. In February 1996, Mr. Grant
was transferred to Brussels, Belgium. He became Managing Director Benelux SCS
effective January 1, 1996. Mr. Grant joined the Management Company in November
1985 as Director of Real Estate Investment and continued to serve in that
capacity until the Merger. He also served as an Executive Vice President of the
Management Company. Mr. Grant was previously a manager with Touche Ross & Co.,
where he was employed for approximately 10 years providing financial consulting,
accounting and auditing services primarily to clients in the real estate,
construction and engineering industries. Mr. Grant has a Bachelor of Arts degree
in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting, both
from Washington State University.
Michael Rowe has served as our Executive Vice President and Director
of Storage Operations since July 1993. Effective January 1, 1996, Mr. Rowe
became our Chief Operating Officer. Prior to the Merger, he served as Executive
Vice President and Director of Storage Operations of the Management Company.
Prior to his employment with the Management Company, he was employed with Touche
Ross & Co., where he participated in independent audits of major real estate
syndication, development and management companies in the Pacific Northwest. He
became Controller of the Management Company in 1982 and Vice President and
Treasurer in 1983. In 1987, Mr. Rowe was named Director of Storage Operations of
the Management Company. Mr. Rowe has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business
Administration from Washington State University.
-13-
<PAGE> 14
Kristin H. Stred has served as our Secretary and General Counsel
since July 1993. She was named Senior Vice President of the Company upon the
closing of the Merger. Ms. Stred joined the Management Company in July 1992 and
until the Merger served as Secretary and General Counsel. She was previously an
attorney with The Boeing Company from October 1991 to July 1992 and Assistant
General Counsel with King Broadcasting Company from July 1987 to September 1991.
Ms. Stred has a Bachelor of Arts degree with honors in general studies from
Harvard University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. She is a member of the
Washington State Bar Association, is a former president of Washington Women
Lawyers and a former member of the Executive Committee of the Corporate Law
Department Section of the Washington State Bar Association.
ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES
The Company owns, as of December 31, 1998, directly and through its
subsidiaries and joint ventures, 318 properties (including 316 self storage
properties), 302 of which are located in 20 states and 16 which are located in
Europe. Our self storage properties are designed to offer accessible storage
space for personal and business use. Individuals typically rent individual units
in self storage properties for storage of personal belongings such as furniture,
appliances, boats and other household and recreational goods. Businesses
typically rent space for storage of business property such as equipment,
seasonal goods, records and fixtures. We believe that it is desirable to have
commercial customers because they tend to rent larger units, stay for longer
terms, are more reliable payers and are less sensitive to price increases.
Accordingly, we have marketing programs that target commercial users. We
estimate that commercial users account for approximately 14%- 23% of our total
customer base.
Our self storage properties are divided into a number of
self-enclosed rental units that generally range in size from 25 to 360 square
feet. Many properties have uncovered storage outside the buildings for parking
motor vehicles, boats, campers and other similar items suitable for outside
storage. Additionally, a number of our properties include climate-controlled
storage units for which we charge rents at substantial premiums.
Customers of self storage properties are generally responsible for
delivering and retrieving their goods. Many leased spaces can be accessed
directly by automobile or truck, but some properties, in particular the
multistory buildings, have separate loading docks and elevators available for
delivery and retrieval of stored goods. Customers generally have access to their
unit without additional charge during normal business hours and control access
to such space through the use of their personal padlocks. We offer Ryder truck
rentals at a majority of our properties for added convenience to our customers
and to differentiate our stores from most of our competitors. In addition to
truck rentals, we sell locks, boxes and packing and storage materials at our
stores.
The leasing, maintenance and operation of our stores are the
responsibility of store managers. The property's security is provided through a
variety of systems that may include, among others, on-site personnel, electronic
devices such as intrusion and fire alarms, access controls, video and intercom
surveillance devices, property fencing and lighting.
Although our stores range considerably in size, most properties
consist of one or more single-story buildings that are located on a site of 1.5
to 5 acres. The smallest store has approximately 23,000 net rentable square
feet, while the largest store has approximately 290,000 net rentable square
feet. The properties generally are constructed with concrete block or tilt-up
concrete panels, with steel columns or precast concrete columns that rest on
concrete footings and slabs, and have built-up
-14-
<PAGE> 15
tar roofs or pitched truss roofs with shingles or standing seam metal roofs. The
interior walls are generally constructed with metal studs and partitions or
other construction materials that are secure but readily movable. The parking
areas and driveways are generally asphalt or cement. All stores have fencing,
floodlights, and electronic gates.
In some cases, multistory buildings able to bear substantial weight
loads, such as warehouses and newspaper plants, have been converted into self
storage properties. In addition, similar multistory buildings for self storage
have been constructed in dense urban areas where land costs, zoning and other
development considerations make it impractical or undesirable to construct
single-story buildings.
The following table provides information regarding the year
developed or acquired, year built, approximate net rentable square feet and
acreage of each of the self storage properties and business parks owned by us as
of December 31, 1998. We own additional properties which are under development,
but not reflected in this table. This table includes stores in which we own an
interest, but whose results are not consolidated for financial reporting
purposes. There are 303 stores whose results are consolidated in the financial
statements. These stores represent 19.6 million net rentable square feet and are
built on approximately 1,200 acres of land.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTYSTATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Ahwatukee (16) Phoenix AZ 1998 1998 70,000 4.1
Airpark Scottsdale AZ 1997 1997 49,000 1.3
Arrowhead (16) Phoenix AZ 1997 1997 67,000 3.2
Chandler Chandler AZ 1986 1986 71,000 4.0
Colonade (12) Phoenix AZ 1998 1996 30,000 2.7
Dobson Ranch Mesa AZ 1996 1978 58,000 4.2
Gilbert Gilbert AZ 1996 1985 66,000 4.0
Mesa Mesa AZ 1987 1985 99,000 4.8
Phoenix Phoenix AZ 1985 1984 78,000 2.7
Phoenix East Phoenix AZ 1987 1984 66,000 2.0
Scottsdale Scottsdale AZ 1985 1976/85 47,000 3.0
Scottsdale North Scottsdale AZ 1985/87 1985 112,000 4.1
Shea Scottsdale AZ 1997 1996 43,000 1.3
Tempe Tempe AZ 1984 1976 54,000 3.0
Warner (2) Mesa AZ 1995 1985 61,000 3.1
Union Hills Phoenix AZ 1998 1998 65,000 3.8
Speedway Tucson AZ 1998 1998 71,000 3.0
Alicia Parkway Laguna Hills CA 1998 1991 99,562 4.5
Aliso Viejo Aliso Viejo CA 1996 1996 86,000 3.5
Bloomington Bloomington CA 1997 1983 50,000 2.8
Castro Valley Castro Valley CA 1996 1975 50,000 2.3
Colton Colton CA 1985 1984 73,000 3.8
Culver City Los Angeles CA 1988 1989 77,000 1.4
Daly City Daly City CA 1995 1989 96,000 5.2
El Cajon El Cajon CA 1986 1977 129,000 6.0
El Cerrito Richmond CA 1986 1987 62,000 1.5
Fontana Sierra Fontana CA 1987 1980/85 85,000 3.6
Hayward/Union City (13) Hayward CA 1985 1985 90,000 5.7
</TABLE>
-15-
<PAGE> 16
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTYSTATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Huntington Beach Huntington Beach CA 1988 1986 99,000 3.3
Kearney-Balboa San Diego CA 1986 1984 90,000 2.3
La Habra La Habra CA 1986 1979/91 95,000 7.1
Martinez(3) Martinez CA 1995 1987 56,000 3.0
Mountain View Mountain View CA 1987 1986 28,000 0.7
Newark Newark CA 1996 1991 61,000 3.1
Ontario Ontario CA 1996 1984 57,000 2.1
Orange Orange CA 1996 1985 89,000 2.8
Palo Alto Palo Alto CA 1986 1987 48,000 1.4
Pinole(3) Pinole CA 1995 1988 37,000 2.5
Sacramento Sacramento CA 1996 1991 53,000 2.6
San Leandro San Leandro CA 1996 1991 59,000 2.7
San Lorenzo San Lorenzo CA 1996 1990 54,000 1.9
Santa Ana Santa Ana CA 1986 1975/86 167,000 8.1
S. San Francisco San Francisco CA 1987 1985 56,000 2.1
Solana Beach(12) Solana Beach CA 1987 1984 87,000 4.5
Sunnyvale Sunnyvale CA 1986 1974/75 101,000 6.5
Tracy Tracy CA 1996 1986 70,000 3.0
Walnut Walnut CA 1996 1986 97,000 3.6
Westwood Santa Monica CA 1986 1988 64,000 0.3
Blossom Valley(16) San Jose CA 1998 1998 64,000 1.4
Lakewood Golden CO 1986 1985 67,000 2.7
Northglenn Northglenn CO 1987 1979 75,000 5.5
Tamarac Denver CO 1984 1977 25,000 1.9
Thornton Denver CO 1984 1984 41,000 2.4
Windermere Littleton CO 1984 1977/79 80,000 5.3
Blue Heron West Palm Beach FL 1987 1975 167,000 11.8
Davie(4) Davie FL 1996 1990 76,000 5.5
Delray Beach Delray Beach FL 1996 1986 77,000 4.5
Lauderhill Lauderhill FL 1997 1986 62,000 4.0
Maitland(11) Orlando FL 1997 1997 78,000 8.7
Margate Margate FL 1996 1984 75,000 4.0
Military Trail West Palm Beach FL 1987 1981 124,000 9.4
Oakland Park Ft. Lauderdale FL 1985 1974/78 290,000 13.4
Oviedo(11) Orlando FL 1997 1997 65,000 9.0
S. Semoran(1) Orlando FL 1997 1997 68,000 5.2
South Orange(11) Orlando FL 1997 1997 71,000 5.0
Seminole Seminole FL 1986 1984/85 61,000 2.7
Red Bug(1) Seminole County FL 1997 1997 75,000 4.3
West Town(1) Altamonte Springs FL 1998 1998 50,000 2.8
Ansley Park Atlanta GA 1995 1991 69,000 1.4
Brookhaven Atlanta GA 1995 1992 66,000 2.0
Clairemont Atlanta GA 1996 1990 41,000 1.1
Decatur Atlanta GA 1995 1992 65,000 2.5
Forest Park Forest Park GA 1996 1980 65,000 7.9
Gwinnett Lawrenceville GA 1996 1996 71,000 4.4
</TABLE>
-16-
<PAGE> 17
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTYSTATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Jones Bridge(16) Atlanta GA 1997 1997 75,000 5.3
Lawrenceville(16) Lawrenceville GA 1997 1997 74,000 3.4
Morgan Falls Dunwoody GA 1996 1990 76,000 3.7
Norcross Norcross GA 1996 1984 62,000 9.3
Peachtree Duluth GA 1997 1996 100,000 6.2
Perimeter Atlanta GA 1996 1996 72,000 3.3
Roswell Roswell GA 1986 1986 57,000 3.8
Satellite Blvd. Duluth GA 1997 1994 75,000 5.2
Stone Mountain Stone Mountain GA 1996 1985 61,000 10.1
Tucker Tucker GA 1996 1987 60,000 4.6
Sandy Plains Marietta GA 1998 1998 67,625 6.9
Alsip Alsip IL 1982 1980 79,000 4.6
Bolingbrook Bolingbrook IL 1997 1997 68,000 1.5
Bridgeview Bridgeview IL 1985 1983 75,000 4.1
Dolton Calumet City IL 1982 1979 79,000 3.0
Fox Valley(16) Chicago IL 1998 1998 71,000 4.6
Hillside Hillside IL 1988 1988 66,000 5.3
Lisle Lisle IL 1986 1976/86 53,000 3.4
Lombard Lombard IL 1982 1980 53,000 3.1
Oak Forest Orland Park IL 1995 1991 87,000 3.9
Rolling Meadows Rolling Meadows IL 1982 1980 71,000 4.5
Schaumburg Schaumburg IL 1982 1980 71,000 4.3
Willowbrook Willowbrook IL 1986 1979/82 44,000 3.3
Allisonville Indianapolis IN 1997 1987 90,000 7.4
Carmel Carmel IN 1996 1996 61,000 4.3
Castleton Indianapolis IN 1998 1988 48,000 3.6
College Park Indianapolis IN 1986 1984 68,000 6.0
County Line(16) SouthPort IN 1998 1998 72,000 4.5
Eaglecreek(16) Indianapolis IN 1998 1998 73,000 5.1
Georgetown Indianapolis IN 1996 1996 72,000 4.2
Glendale Indianapolis IN 1986 1985 60,000 5.6
Annapolis(12),(16) Annapolis MD 1998 1998 69,000 3.2
Briggs Chaney Silver Spring MD 1994 1987 28,000 2.0
Clinton Clinton MD 1986 1985 30,000 2.0
Crofton Gambrills MD 1988 1985 40,000 2.1
Frederick Frederick MD 1994 1987 32,000 1.7
Gaithersburg Gaithersburg MD 1994 1986 77,000 5.4
Germantown Germantown MD 1994 1988 45,000 1.9
Laurel Laurel MD 1988 1984 30,000 2.0
Oxon Hill Ft. Washington MD 1994 1987 28,000 1.3
Suitland Suitland MD 1987 1985 45,000 2.7
Ann Arbor Ann Arbor MI 1988 1977 62,000 3.9
Canton Canton MI 1988 1986 56,000 3.3
Flint East Flint MI 1997 1977 45,000 2.7
Fraser Fraser MI 1988 1985 73,000 5.2
Grand Rapids Grand Rapids MI 1983 1978 45,000 3.2
</TABLE>
-17-
<PAGE> 18
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTYSTATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Jackson Jackson MI 1997 1978 49,000 3.1
Kalamazoo Kalamazoo MI 1980 1980 41,000 3.0
Lansing Lansing MI 1983 1978/79 40,000 2.5
Livonia LIvonia MI 1988 1985 67,000 4.8
Madison Heights Detroit MI 1995 1977 66,000 4.1
Plymouth Canton Township MI 1985 1979 62,000 5.3
Rochester Utica MI 1996 1989 57,000 4.8
Saginaw Saginaw MI 1997 1978 57,000 3.1
Southfield Southfield MI 1983 1976 76,000 4.3
Sterling Heights Sterling Heights MI 1996 1986 105,000 8.9
Taylor Taylor MI 1995 1980 83,000 4.2
Troy East Troy MI 1981 1975/77 81,000 4.8
Troy West Troy MI 1983 1979 88,000 5.2
Walled Lake Walled Lake MI 1985/89 1984 69,000 4.3
Warren Warren MI 1988 1985 68,000 4.6
Bellefontaine St. Louis MO 1985 1979 46,000 4.9
Brentwood Brentwood MO 1988 1977 52,000 3.4
Olive Innerbelt St. Louis MO 1987 1952/86 99,000 2.5
South Haven(10) Memphis MS 1998 1998 43,000 7.7
Capital Blvd. Raleigh NC 1994 1984 34,000 2.1
Cary Cary NC 1994 1984 58,000 4.7
Creedmoor(16) Raleigh NC 1997 1997 72,000 5.1
Garner Garner NC 1994 1987 28,000 3.1
Glenwood Raleigh NC 1994 1983 31,000 1.9
Morrisville Morrisville NC 1994 1988 40,000 3.3
Old Bridge Matawan NJ 1987 1987 77,000 6.1
Gold Brooklyn NY 1986 1940 102,000 0.4
Northern(12) Long Island City NY 1987 1940 76,000 1.9
Utica Brooklyn NY 1986 1964 75,000 1.1
Van Dam Long Island City NY 1986 1925 56,000 0.5
Yonkers Yonkers NY 1986 1928 100,000 1.6
Melville Long Island NY 1998 1998 74,000 7.4
16th and Sandy(3) Portland OR 1995 1973 26,000 0.5
Allen Blvd. Beaverton OR 1996 1973 42,000 2.6
Barbur Boulevard Portland OR 1995 1993 67,000 2.8
Beaverton Beaverton OR 1985 1974 25,000 2.0
Denny Road Beaverton OR 1989 1988 65,000 6.2
Division(4) Portland OR 1996 1992 47,000 2.0
Gresham Portland OR 1996 1996 64,000 4.4
Hillsboro Portland OR 1996 1996 65,000 8.9
King City Tigard OR 1987 1986 83,000 4.9
Liberty Road Salem OR 1995 1993 54,000 4.4
Milwaukie(4) Milwaukie OR 1996 1990 62,000 3.3
Oregon City Portland OR 1995 1992 57,000 3.2
Portland Portland OR 1988 1988 49,000 2.1
Salem Salem OR 1983 1979/81 67,000 3.8
</TABLE>
-18-
<PAGE> 19
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTYSTATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Airport Philadelphia PA 1986 1985 96,000 6.7
Edgemont Philadelphia PA 1995 1992 64,000 5.5
Painter's Crossing(16) Philadelphia PA 1998 1998 49,000 3.3
West Chester(12) West Chester PA 1986 1980 84,000 7.0
Franklin(8) Nashville TN 1995 1995 55,000 3.3
Hermitage(7) Nashville TN 1995 1995 65,000 2.8
Hickory Hollow(9) Nashville TN 1997 1997 46,000 2.5
Medical Center(6) Nashville TN 1994 1995 60,000 2.3
Rivergate(8) Nashville TN 1996 1996 46,000 4.7
Stones River(11) Murfeesboro TN 1998 1998 39,000 3.3
Sycamore(10) Memphis TN 1998 1984/88 45,000 3.1
Winchester(10) Memphis TN 1998 1988 65,000 8.9
Wolfchase(10) Memphis TN 1997 1997 39,000 1.8
Arlington/Forum 303 Arlington TX 1986 1984 57,000 2.7
Bandera Road San Antonio TX 1988 1981 75,000 3.6
Bedford Bedford TX 1985 1984 69,000 2.7
Beltline Road Irving TX 1989 1985/86 68,000 6.3
Blanco Road San Antonio TX 1988 1989/91 66,000 3.6
Champions Houston TX 1998 1998 65,000 3.7
East Lamar Arlington TX 1996 1996 43,000 3.0
Federal Houston TX 1988 1988 55,000 3.4
Fredicksburg San Antonio TX 1987 1978/82 82,000 4.5
Georgetown Austin TX 1997 1996 58,000 4.1
Greenville(16) Dallas TX 1998 1998 61,000 2.8
Henderson Pass San Antonio TX 1998 1995 46,000 2.5
Highway 78 San Antonio TX 1998 1997 55,000 4.4
Hill Country Village San Antonio TX 1985 1982 79,000 4.0
Hillcroft(12) Houston TX 1991 1988 59,000 3.4
Hurst Hurst TX 1987 1974 67,000 4.7
Imperial Valley Houston TX 1988 1987 54,000 3.1
Irving/MacArthur Blvd.(13) Irving TX 1985 1975/84 141,000 11.4
Kingwood Kingwood TX 1988 1988 54,000 3.3
Lewisville Dallas TX 1997 1997 62,000 4.0
McArthur Crossing Irving TX 1996 1996 65,000 4.1
Medical Center Houston TX 1989 1989 57,000 2.6
Mission Bend Houston TX 1995 1995 69,000 4.1
Nacodoches San Antonio TX 1998 1996 39,000 2.5
North Austin Austin TX 1986 1982 67,000 5.9
Park Cities East Dallas TX 1995 1995 68,000 4.3
Parker Road Dallas TX 1995 1995 65,000 3.5
Preston Road Dallas TX 1997 1997 62,000 3.2
River Oaks(4) Houston TX 1996 1989 67,000 2.4
Round Rock Austin TX 1997 1995 55,000 3.6
San Antonio NE San Antonio TX 1985 1982 74,000 3.6
Slaughter Lane Austin TX 1997 1994 76,000 4.6
South Cooper Arlington TX 1996 1996 66,000 3.7
</TABLE>
-19-
<PAGE> 20
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTYSTATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sugarland Sugarland TX 1988 1987 55,000 3.0
T.C. Jester Houston TX 1996 1990 64,000 2.8
Thousand Oaks San Antonio TX 1986 1987 53,000 2.9
Universal City(2) San Antonio TX 1995 1985 82,000 5.1
Valley Ranch Coppell TX 1997 1995 94,000 5.1
West U Houston TX 1989 1988 60,000 1.8
Westheimer Houston TX 1986 1977 73,000 3.7
Windcrest San Antonio TX 1996 1975 87,000 6.3
Woodforest Houston TX 1996 1996 54,000 6.2
Woodlands Houston TX 1988 1988 64,000 3.8
Southlake Dallas TX 1998 1998 66,000 4.6
Bayside Virginia Beach VA 1988 1984 28,000 1.7
Burke Fairfax VA 1996 1984 32,000 1.7
Cedar Road Chesapeake VA 1994 1989 36,000 2.1
Charlottesville Charlottesville VA 1994 1984 32,000 2.1
Chesapeake Chesapeake VA 1996 1986 58,000 5.2
Crater Road Petersburg VA 1994 1987 36,000 3.8
Dale City Dale City VA 1994 1986 31,000 1.6
Fairfax Fairfax VA 1986 1980 62,000 5.6
Falls Church Falls Church VA 1987 1988 93,000 1.5
Gainesville Gainesville VA 1994 1988 31,000 2.0
Herndon Herndon VA 1988 1985 39,000 3.0
Holland Road Virginia Beach VA 1994 1985 34,000 3.9
Jeff Davis Hwy Richmond VA 1994 1990 35,000 5.2
Kempsville Virginia Beach VA 1989 1985 33,000 2.0
Laskin Road Virginia Beach VA 1994 1984 39,000 2.5
Leesburg Leesburg VA 1996 1986 28,000 1.6
Manassas E. & W.(13) Manassas VA 1988 1984 69,000 3.5
McLean(12) McLean VA 1997 1997 38,000 4.2
Midlothian Turnpike Richmond VA 1996 1984 44,000 2.9
Newport News North Newport News VA 1996 1986 59,000 3.8
Newport News. S Newport News VA 1985/92 1985 59,000 3.9
North Richmond Richmond VA 1988 1984 37,000 2.6
Potomac Mills(16) Potomac Mills VA 1997 1997 69,000 3.8
Princess Anne Road Virginia Beach VA 1994 1985 40,000 2.2
S. Military Highway Virginia Beach VA 1996 1984 48,000 2.7
Cascades(16) Sterling VA 1998 1998 63,000 7.7
Temple Avenue Petersburg VA 1994 1989 34,000 4.0
Virginia Beach Virginia Beach VA 1989 1985 65,000 2.3
Auburn Auburn WA 1996 1996 62,000 7.3
Bellefield Bellevue WA 1996 1978 65,000 2.9
Bellevue East & West(13) Bellevue WA 1984 1975 165,000 10.8
Bellingham Bellingham WA 1981 1981 74,000 5.7
Bremerton Bremerton WA 1997 1976 41,000 2.5
Burien Seattle WA 1985 1974 92,000 5.3
Burien II Seattle WA 1985 1979 60,000 3.0
</TABLE>
-20-
<PAGE> 21
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTYSTATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Canyon Park JV(5) Bothell WA 1996 1990 58,000 4.4
Capitol Hill(1) Seattle WA 1987 1988 71,000 0.7
Canyon Rd. Puyallup WA 1996 1986 28,000 1.7
E. Bremerton Bremerton WA 1996 1985 66,000 3.1
East Lynnwood Lynnwood WA 1986 1978 80,000 3.8
Edmonds Edmonds WA 1984 1974/75 121,000 6.5
Everett Everett WA 1981 1978 63,000 4.2
Factoria Bellevue WA 1984 1984 57,000 3.8
Factoria Square Bellevue WA 1996 1989 70,000 1.9
Federal Way Federal Way WA 1984 1975 134,000 5.7
Fife(14) Tacoma WA 1984 1977 63,000 3.9
Hazel Dell(4) Vancouver WA 1996 1989 56,000 3.4
Highland Hill Tacoma WA 1981 1982 60,000 3.9
Issaquah Issaquah WA 1985 1986 56,000 4.7
Kennydale Renton WA 1996 1991 57,000 2.8
Kent Kent WA 1997 1977 44,000 2.5
Lacey Olympia WA 1997 1977 25,000 1.4
Lakewood 512(14) Tacoma WA 87/88/91 1979/81 130,000 12.2
Lynnwood Lynnwood WA 1997 1979 54,000 4.0
North Spokane Spokane WA 1984 1976 78,000 4.1
Parkland Tacoma WA 1997 1980 52,000 4.2
Pier 57 Seattle WA 1986 1912 59,000 0.3
Pt. Orchard Pt. Orchard WA 1997 1991 46,000 3.0
Renton Renton WA 1984 1979/89 80,000 4.5
Redmond Redmond WA 1998 1998 52,000 3.0
Salmon Creek Vancouver WA 1997 1997 68,000 2.6
Sammamish(16) Redmond WA 1998 1998 76,000 5.0
Shoreline/Aurora N.(13) Seattle WA 1986 1978 136,000 6.1
Smokey Point Arlington WA 1987 1984/87 35,000 2.2
South Center Renton WA 1985 1979 68,000 4.1
South Hill Seattle WA 1995 1980 45,000 2.8
South Tacoma Tacoma WA 1987 1975 46,000 3.1
Spokane Spokane WA 1997 1976 49,000 2.6
Sprague(4) Tacoma WA 1996 1950/89 52,000 2.8
Totem Lake Kirkland WA 1984 1978 61,000 2.6
Vancouver Mall Vancouver WA 1980 1982 46,000 3.3
West Olympia Olympia WA 1997 1978 30,000 2.2
West Seattle Seattle WA 1997 1997 66,000 3.4
Whitecenter Seattle WA 1980 1981 48,000 3.4
Woodinville Woodinville WA 1984 1982/84 70,000 3.5
Mill Creek Everett WA 1998 1998 68,000 3.1
Lake Union Seattle WA 1998 1998 49,000 2.1
Interbay Seattle WA 1987 1988 84,000 0.4
Lake City(2) Seattle WA 1995 1987 51,000 1.1
Aartselaar(15) Brussels Belgium 1997 1997 76,000 1.7
Forest(15) Brussels Belgium 1995 1995 49,000 0.4
</TABLE>
-21-
<PAGE> 22
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTY STATE/ APPROXIMATE NET
PROPERTY NAME PROPERTY LOCATION COUNTRY OWNED SINCE YEAR BUILT RENTABLE SQUARE FEET ACREAGE
- ------------- ----------------- --------------- ----------- ---------- -------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Machelen(15) Brussels Belgium 1997 1997 65,000 1.5
Molenbeek(15) Brussels Belgium 1995 1995 34,000 0.5
Waterloo(15) Brussels Belgium 1995 1995 86,000 3.5
Zaventem(15) Brussels Belgium 1996 1996 75,000 3.0
Leuven(15) Brussels Belgium 1998 1998 63,000 1.7
Overijse(15) Brussels Belgium 1998 1998 49,000 1.4
Ghent(15) Brussels Belgium 1998 1998 72,000 1.7
Montrouge(15) Paris France 1997 1996 59,000 1.4
Nice(15) Nice France 1997 1991 42,000 1.0
Varlin(15) Paris France 1997 1997 23,000 0.5
Jacobsberg(15) Stockholm Sweden 1998 1998 60,000 2.6
Kungens Kurva(15) Stockholm Sweden 1998 1998 72,000 6.8
Taby(15) Stockholm Sweden 1998 1998 60,000 2.5
Rissne(15) Stockholm Sweden 1998 1998 67,000 2.3
---------- -----
Total 20,474,000 1,192
========== =====
</TABLE>
- -------------
(1) We own a 90% interest in this property.
(2) We own a 82.5% interest in this property.
(Does not include general partner interest)
(3) We own a 56.7% interest in this property.
(Does not include general partner interest)
(4) We own a 82.5% interest in this property.
(Does not include general partner interest)
(5) We own a 12.8% interest in this property.
(Does not include general partner interest)
(6) We own a 67% interest in this property.
(7) We own a 50% interest in this property.
(8) We own a 86% interest in this property.
(9) We own a 84% interest in this property
(10) We own a 86% interest in this property.
(11) We own a 85% interest in this property.
(12) We do not have fee title, but have a long-term lease, with respect to the
land on which this property is located.
(13) These properties are now operated as one property.
(14) Property is a business park.
(15) We own a 13.06% interest in this property
(16) We own a 10% interest in this property.
-22-
<PAGE> 23
The following table sets forth information by state regarding
weighted average occupancy and weighted average rent per square foot for the
domestic self storage properties owned by the Company for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
% OF 1998 AVERAGE OCCUPANCY AVERAGE RENT PER SQUARE FOOT
--------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------------
STATE REVENUE 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996
- ----------------- --------- ----- ---- ---- ------ ----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Arizona 4% 77% 78% 78% $ 9.38 $ 9.19 $ 9.21
California 15 91 89 88 10.97 10.38 10.32
Florida 7 83 85 85 9.80 9.00 8.41
Georgia 5 75 83 86 9.87 10.07 12.18
Illinois 4 85 90 94 9.60 9.25 8.60
Michigan 6 89 89 91 8.23 7.88 8.09
New York 4 88 88 89 18.35 17.25 15.98
Oregon 4 84 81 84 9.19 8.81 8.34
Texas 13 84 81 79 8.69 8.27 8.19
Virginia 9 84 87 92 10.60 9.75 9.35
Washington 18 87 90 90 9.90 8.87 8.41
Other 11 78 77 85 9.72 9.40 9.99
--- --- --- --- ------ ------ ------
Weighted Average 100% 84% 86% 87% $ 9.90 $ 9.37 $ 9.23
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth information for all domestic
properties owned by the Company regarding weighted average occupancy and
weighted average rent per square foot for the years ended December 31, 1998
through December 31, 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average occupancy 84% 86% 87% 88% 89%
Weighted average rent per square foot $ 9.90 $ 9.37 $ 9.23 $ 8.84 $ 8.25
</TABLE>
Leasing of Properties. Rental units are usually rented on a
month-to-month basis. The average rental period for a tenant is approximately
1.5 years. This average is comprised of the rental periods of business tenants,
who tend to lease space for longer periods (approximately two to three years),
and those of residential customers, who tend to lease space for shorter periods
(approximately six months to a year). Rental income from leased space
constitutes the primary revenue from such properties, but additional revenue is
received from incidental services rendered at the properties, such as lock and
box sales and truck rentals. Rental rates vary substantially depending on the
size of the storage space, the property location, the quality of the property
and the proximity of competition.
Other Properties. The Company owns two business parks, both of which
are located near Tacoma, Washington. The business parks were built in 1977 and
1979 and contain an aggregate of approximately 191,000 net rentable square feet.
We also manage one additional business park for an unaffiliated owner. In
addition, we own a property in downtown Seattle, Washington that, until 1997,
was leased to a records storage company affiliated with our management, on terms
approved by our disinterested directors. The building was then converted to
self-storage and reopened for operations in 1998.
-23-
<PAGE> 24
ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On April 6, 1998, a lawsuit was filed against Shurgard Storage
Centers, Inc., in the Superior Court of California for Alameda County. The
plaintiff is a California unincorporated association, the Consumer Justice
Foundation, claiming to bring the action on behalf of the general public. The
Complaint alleges that the late fees and lien fees collected by Shurgard are not
liquidated damages but constitute an unenforceable penalty in violation of the
California Business and Professions Code and the California Civil Code. The
plaintiff further alleges that imposing late fees and lien fees constitutes an
unfair business practice under the California Business and Professions Code. The
plaintiff seeks restitution in an undisclosed amount, injunctive relief, as well
as costs and attorneys' fees. It is too early to predict the impact, if any,
this suit will have on our operating results. The Company intends to vigorously
defend against the plaintiff's claims.
ITEM 4 - SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders during the
fourth quarter of 1998.
PART II
ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Company's common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol
"SHU." As of February 26, 1999 there were 23,165 holders of record of our common
stock and the reported NYSE closing price per share of common stock was $24.75.
The table below sets forth for the fiscal periods indicated the high
and low closing prices per share of Common Stock as reported in published
financial sources, and distributions declared.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRICE PER SHARE OF
COMMON STOCK DISTRIBUTIONS
---------------------
HIGH LOW DECLARED(1)
------ ------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1998
Fourth Quarter.............. 27.25 24.50 $.49
Third Quarter............... 29.38 24.38 .49
Second Quarter.............. 29.00 27.31 .49
First Quarter............... $29.56 $27.50 .49
1997
Fourth Quarter.............. 29.94 26.81 .48
Third Quarter............... 29.25 27.25 .48
Second Quarter.............. 28.88 26.00 .48
First Quarter............... $29.50 $27.63 .48
</TABLE>
- -------
(1) Distributions declared by the Board of Directors based on financial results
for the quarter specified.
Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive
distributions when declared by our Board of Directors out of any assets legally
available for payment. We are required to distribute annually to our
shareholders at least 95% of our "REIT taxable income," which, as defined by the
relevant tax statutes and regulations, is generally equivalent to net taxable
ordinary income.
-24-
<PAGE> 25
ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data of the Company
should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the other financial
information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in thousands, except per share data)
COMPANY
------------------------------------------------------------------------- PREDECESSOR(1)
AT OR FOR YEAR ----------------
ENDED DEC. 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------- JAN. 1 TO MARCH 1
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1994
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA:
Total revenue $ 159,254 $ 140,434 $ 110,399 $ 96,771 $ 66,921 $ 12,368
Net income 44,734 42,311 32,785 29,572 17,821 34,286
Net income per common share:(2)
Basic 1.40 1.40 1.39 1.43 1.05 63.97
Diluted 1.39 1.40 1.39 1.43 1.05 63.97
Distributions declared per
common share:(2)
Basic 1.95 1.91 1.41(5) 2.38(4) 1.02(3) 732.05
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets 1,153,907 955,488 804,483 610,394 494,590 391,685
Total borrowings 426,137 296,971 272,791 142,840 167,137 ---
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) The Predecessor information reflects the combination of the 17
partnerships operated prior to the March 1, 1994 consolidation.
(2) Predecessor "per share" information is net income and distributions per
limited partner unit. Distributions for the period from January 1, 1994 to
March 1, 1994 include the liquidating distribution made in connection with
the Consolidation.
(3) Does not include the distribution of $.44 per share declared in January
1995 based on financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 1994.
(4) Includes distribution of $.44 per share declared in January 1995 based on
financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 1994 as well as the
special distribution of $.10 declared in November 1995.
(5) Does not include the distribution of $.47 per share declared in January
1997 based on financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 1996.
ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. is a fully integrated,
self-administered, self-managed REIT headquartered in Seattle, Washington,
specializing in all aspects of the self storage industry. As of December 31,
1998, we operated a network of 348 storage centers located throughout the United
States and in Europe. Of these properties, we own, directly and through our
subsidiaries and joint ventures, 318 operating properties (including 316 self
storage properties), containing approximately 20.5 million net rentable square
feet. Of the 318 operating properties, 302 are located in 20 states in the U.S.
and 16 are located in Europe. Self storage properties offer low-cost, easily
accessible storage space for personal and business uses.
-25-
<PAGE> 26
Our investment objective is to maximize shareholder value by
increasing funds from operations through internal growth and through the
acquisition and development of additional self storage properties. We believe
that the experience of our management team in acquiring, developing, and
operating self storage properties, our geographic diversification and our
emphasis on quality will enhance our ability to achieve this objective.
Our mission is to be the global leader in storage products and
services. We believe we can obtain this goal by focusing on providing
exceptional customer service and the highest quality products to our customers.
We believe that in order to supply the best customer service in the
industry, we must have employees who are responsive to customer needs.
Accordingly, we promote employee empowerment and training programs, as well as
personnel policies that attract quality people. We also promote entrepreneurial
attitudes among our employees by encouraging the exchange of ideas on providing
new ways to meet customers' needs. One product that is currently being offered
as a result of this company culture involves bringing storage to the customer
through "Shurgard to You". Shurgard To You is a program under which a Shurgard
employee goes directly to the customers' home or business in order to rent a
storage unit or deliver packing supplies depending on the customers need. This
product is currently only available in select markets pending customer demand.
Another strategy is to make the process of renting storage more convenient by
placing kiosks in local malls at which a customer may rent either a storage unit
or a container.
As part of our focus on providing the highest quality products to
our customers, we look for those storage centers that are located in
well-populated retail areas. When entering a market, we seek dominant locations
within specific three to five mile trade areas. "Dominant locations" refers to
highly visible and accessible locations in retail corridors which create
customer awareness. Through multiple locations of this kind within a
metropolitan area, we establish brand recognition as well as economies of scale
in operating our stores. We seek to own at least 15 stores in each of our
markets in order to realize these efficiencies. To further enhance brand
recognition, we strive to achieve a uniform look to our properties. This is
accomplished through the use of signage, color schemes, quality of the building
and our trademark "lighthouse" office design in new developments.
Throughout the past four years we have expanded our portfolio of
real estate properties and real estate based investments through the use of
equity and debt capital. During 1998, we acquired eight and developed 24 new
domestic centers directly or through joint ventures. Additionally, we opened
three developments in Belgium and four in Sweden during 1998. The following
discussion of operations provides additional comparative financial information
and discussion of each of the areas of growth, including internal or same store
growth, direct acquisitions, domestic development, European operations, property
management operations and other forms of real estate investments. A discussion
of capital expenditures, financing transactions and liquidity is also included.
-26-
<PAGE> 27
********************************************************************************
When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, the words "believes," "anticipates," "projects" and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements regarding
financial performance. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES
INCLUDING THE RISK THAT COMPETITION FROM NEW SELF STORAGE FACILITIES OR OTHER
STORAGE ALTERNATIVES MAY CAUSE RENT TO DECLINE AND MAY CAUSE OCCUPANCY RATES TO
DROP, TAX LAW CHANGES MAY CHANGE THE TAXABILITY OF FUTURE INCOME, AND LITIGATION
MAY MATERIALLY DECREASE LATE FEE REVENUE. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER IF INCREASES
IN LABOR, TAXES, MARKETING AND OTHER OPERATING AND CONSTRUCTION EXPENSES OCCUR.
Other factors which could affect our financial results are described below and
in Item 1 (Business) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking
statements are based on estimates as of the date of this report. The Company
disclaims any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to
these forward-looking statements reflecting new estimates, events or
circumstances after the date of this report.
********************************************************************************
INTERNAL GROWTH
In 1998, we continued our focus on increasing net operating income
from our existing real estate assets. The primary way we analyze our performance
is to measure year over year improvements in Same Store operating results. Our
definition of Same Stores includes existing facilities acquired prior to January
1 of the previous year as well as developed properties that have been operating
for a full eight quarters as of the beginning of the fourth quarter. We include
these newly developed storage centers in our Same Store comparison beginning the
quarter following their second anniversary of opening. We project that newly
developed properties will reach stabilization in an average of 21 to 24 months.
Please note that our definition of Same Stores results in the addition of stores
each year as new acquisitions and developments meet the criteria for inclusion,
and that we then include these stores in the previous year's comparable data.
Other storage companies may define Same Stores differently, which will affect
the comparability of the data. The following table summarizes Same Store
operating performance as defined at December 31, 1998 and 1997.
SAME STORE RESULTS
(dollars in thousands except average rent)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,(1)
--------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
1998 1997 % CHANGE 1997 1996 % CHANGE
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rental revenue $ 146,138 $ 139,564 4.7% $ 112,068 $ 106,463 5.3%
Property operating expenses(2) 41,025 41,329 (0.7)% 32,832 32,593 0.7%
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net operating income $ 105,113 $ 98,235 7.0% $ 79,236 $ 73,870 7.3%
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Avg. annual rent per sq.ft.(3) $ 10.08 $ 9.65 4.5% $ 9.68 $ 9.24 4.8%
Avg. sq.ft. occupancy 88% 87% 88% 88%
Total net rentable sq.ft 15,300,000 15,300,000 11,500,000 11,500,000
No. of properties 232 232 172 172
</TABLE>
-27-
<PAGE> 28
- ------------
(1) This data has been re-stated from the 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-k to
conform with our current definition of same stores.
(2) Includes all direct property expenses. Does not include any allocation of
joint expenses incurred by the Company such as off-site management
personnel.
(3) Average annual rent per square foot is calculated by dividing actual rent
collected by the average number of square feet occupied during the period.
Similar to last year, the business trends in most of our markets
continue to be positive. This is a direct reflection of the strength of the
demand in most of our trade areas and the quality of our stores and our people.
During 1998, we experienced increased competition in several of our markets
where competitors have opened in the vicinity of some of our stores. Markets
impacted by this increased competition include Atlanta, South Florida, and
Tennessee. We believe that the quality of our storage centers as well as our
geographic diversity helps mitigate the impact of competition in individual
markets. Market conditions in California, Illinois, and Virginia contributed to
above average revenue increases.
Various programs are utilized to obtain and keep storage customers
and thus maximize property revenue. Providing the best customer service requires
exceptional employees and on-going quality training. Personnel are trained in
all aspects of storage operations from operating the computer system and renting
a unit to analyzing demand and pricing strategies. They are also trained and
authorized to make substantially all pricing and customer service decisions
on-site, with reference to our values and mission statement. These training and
personnel programs are continually evaluated and improved upon to help in the
retention and recruitment of store level employees. Last year at this time, we
anticipated a very real challenge in the recruitment of store level employees.
We responded by improving our benefits and compensation programs in order to
attract and retain quality store managers. As a result, our turnover and
retention rates improved 15.4% in 1998 over 1997. We are seeing continuing tight
labor markets.
Net operating income has risen over the last three years due to
increases in revenue, which are a function of changes in rental rates and
occupancy. While storage has a seasonal trend, spring and summer being peak
occupancy periods, the cycle is annual and the revenue trend from 1996 to 1998
reflects general market changes. Revenue gains from 1996 to 1997 resulted
entirely from rental rate increases, while gains from 1997 to 1998 resulted
primarily from rate increases with slight occupancy improvements.
Direct operating expenses were down slightly in 1998 compared to
1997 due to several factors. Increases in personnel costs were offset by
decreases in repairs and maintenance due to lower weather related expenditures
in 1998 when compared to 1997. We expect this trend to turn around in 1999, as
the winter of 1998 was unusually mild. Additionally, property insurance was down
slightly due to improved rates and market conditions, which are unlikely to
continue to decline. Direct operating expenses remained stable from 1996 to 1997
as increases in personnel costs and real estate taxes were offset by decreases
in yellow pages advertising and an extensive expense control focus by field
personnel.
One way we are making storage more convenient for the customer is
through the addition of Shurgard Storage Stops in major malls. These kiosks
(sales counters located in the center of malls) are staffed with trained sales
representatives who are available to answer questions about both self storage
and containerized storage. They have computer links to area storage centers
through which they can give rate and availability information and lease units or
containers to customers on the spot.
-28-
<PAGE> 29
We currently have five kiosks in three key markets: Portland, Chicago, and the
Seattle metropolitan area. Expenses related to this new sales channel, which is
in its second year of operations, are included in same store operating results
as of December 31, 1998. During 1998, we rented approximately 380 Shurgard To Go
containers (see OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS-Containerized Storage), 1400 self
storage rentals and generated approximately $25,000 in retail sales.
On April 6, 1998, a lawsuit was filed in the state of California
against Shurgard Storage Centers Inc., alleging that our late fees and lien fees
constitute an unfair business practice. It is too early to predict the impact,
if any, this suit will have on our operating results. Our late fee revenue in
California or other states could be negatively impacted if we were to change our
practices. See Part I, Item 3: Legal Proceedings.
NEW STORES
Our definition of New Stores, as shown in the table below, includes
existing domestic facilities that had not been acquired as of January 1 the
previous year as well as domestic developed properties that have not been
operating a full eight quarters.
NEW STORE RESULTS
(Dollars in thousands except average rent)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
-------------------- --------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rental revenue $21,579 $ 7,193 $34,689 $ 6,828
Property operating expenses(1) 9,167 3,430 11,927 3,123
------- ------- ------- -------
Net operating income $12,412 $ 3,763 $22,762 $ 3,705
======= ======= ======= =======
No. of properties 69 69 95 95
No. of property months(2) 667 245 969 276
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Includes all direct property expenses. Does not include any allocation of
joint expenses incurred by the Company such as off-site management
personnel.
(2) Represents the sum of the number of months we operated each property
during the year.
-29-
<PAGE> 30
Increases from year to year in net operating income (NOI) for the new
store portfolio reflect the greater number of property months included for the
periods presented. Although this increase gives some indication of how much of
our overall NOI growth results from this segment, it is not a good method of
evaluating the performance of assets within this segment. We use several
different methods when evaluating the performance of assets in this segment.
Acquisitions in this portfolio are evaluated based on the yield on invested
cost, while development properties are evaluated based on comparisons of actual
results to pro forma NOI for the appropriate period from opening or at
stabilization. The performance of our acquisitions and developments are
discussed in the sections that follow.
DOMESTIC ACQUISITIONS
Although availability of capital and competition has in many cases
driven acquisition prices up, we have continued to selectively seek acquisition
opportunities for high quality storage centers that meet our investment
standards. We have limited our efforts to pursue only those centers that enhance
our existing network of stores (i.e. establish greater market presence or expand
an established market to create greater economies of scale) and thus can be
efficiently managed and operated. The operating results of our acquisitions are
presented in the tables below in order to show the impact of our operating
strategies since the acquisition date. For a discussion of partnership units
acquired, see OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS.
RESULTS OF 1998 ACQUISITIONS
(dollars in thousands except average rent)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DEC. 31, 1998
-------------
<S> <C>
Rental revenue $ 1,552
Property operating expenses(1) 587
--------
Net operating income $ 965
========
Avg. annual rent per sq.ft.(2) $ 8.40
Avg. sq.ft. occupancy 91%
Total net rentable sq.ft 347,000
Number of properties 7
Number of property-months(3) 53
Purchase price $ 15,658
</TABLE>
- -----------
(1) Includes all direct property expenses. Does not include any allocation of
joint expenses incurred such as off-site management personnel.
(2) Average annual rent per square foot is calculated by dividing actual rents
collected by the average number of square feet occupied during the period.
(3) Represents the sum of the number of months we operated each property
during the year.
-30-
<PAGE> 31
During 1998, we purchased seven storage centers totaling 450,000 net
rentable square feet for a total cost of $23.8 million (including the cost
associated with the related non-competition agreements). We also acquired a
leasehold in an existing self storage center containing 41,000 net rentable
square feet for $1.2 million. These acquisitions were located as follows: one in
Arizona, one in California, one in Indiana, two in Tennessee, and three in
Texas. The California property was purchased on December 22, 1998, and therefore
had no material impact on our operations and has been excluded from the table
above. The 1999 projected yield on these properties is 10.5%-11% (calculated as
projected 1999 net operating income less lease payments divided by purchase
price). These projections are based on numerous assumptions and actual results
may vary due to the factors discussed in the OVERVIEW.
RESULTS OF 1997 ACQUISITIONS
(dollars in thousands except average rent)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DEC. 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 % CHANGE
---------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rental revenue $ 9,353 $ 4,142 125%
Property operating expenses(1) 3,206 1,600 100%
---------- ----------
Net operating income $ 6,147 $ 2,542 142%
========== ==========
Avg. annual rent per sq.ft.(2) $ 7.85 $ 7. 83
Avg. sq.ft. occupancy 83% 81%
Total net rentable sq.ft 1,314,000 1,314,000
Number of properties 23 23
Number of property-months(3) 276 128
Purchase price $ 65,600
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Includes all direct property expenses. Does not include any allocation of
joint expenses incurred such as off-site management personnel.
(2) Average annual rent per square foot is calculated by dividing actual rents
collected by the average number of square feet occupied during the period.
(3) Represents the sum of the number of months we operated each property
during the year.
During 1997, we purchased 23 storage centers totaling 1.3 million
net rentable square feet for a total cost of $65.6 million (including related
non-competition agreements). These acquisitions were located as follows: two in
Arizona, one in California, one in Florida, two in Georgia, one in Indiana, one
in Illinois, three in Michigan, four in Texas, and eight in Washington. Several
of these properties were newly constructed and still renting up when they were
acquired and thus their average occupancy and yield are lower than most
acquisitions. The 1998 yield on these 23 properties was 9.4% (calculated as
actual 1998 net operating income divided by purchase price).
RESULTS OF 1996 ACQUISITIONS
(dollars in thousands except average rent)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DEC. 31
-----------------------------------------------
1998 1997 % CHANGE
---------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rental revenue $ 20,470 $ 20,158 1.5%
Property operating expenses(1) 5,572 5,839 (4.6)%
---------- ----------
Net operating income $ 14,898 $ 14,319 4.0%
========== ==========
Avg. annual rent per sq.ft.(2) $ 9.22 $ 8.92
Avg. sq.ft. occupancy 87% 88%
Total net rentable sq.ft 2,400,000 2,400,000
Number of properties 40 40
Number of property-months(3) 480 480
Purchase price $ 131,600
</TABLE>
-31-
<PAGE> 32
- --------------
(1) Includes all direct property expenses. Does not include any allocation of
joint expenses incurred such as off-site management personnel.
(2) Average annual rent per square foot is calculated by dividing actual rents
collected by the average number of square feet occupied during the period.
(3) Represents the sum of the number of months we operated each property
during the year.
In 1996 we purchased 40 storage centers, four in which we previously
owned a 30% interest. Thirty-seven of these properties, totaling 2.3 million net
rentable square feet, were purchased on November 14, 1996, through the
acquisition of three affiliated partnerships (the IDS Partnerships). We paid
approximately $122 million for the 33 storage centers and the remaining 70%
interest in the four centers mentioned above. The purchase, which included $1.6
million in net liabilities and approximately $3 million in transaction costs,
was funded through cash ($59 million) and the issuance of stock ($64 million).
Additional acquisitions included two properties located in the greater Seattle,
WA metropolitan area, and one located in Atlanta, GA. These three properties
cost $6.4 million and added approximately 135,000 net rentable square feet to
our portfolio. The 1998 yield on all 1996 acquisitions was 11.3% (calculated as
actual 1998 net operating income divided by purchase price). These 1996
acquisitions are included in our Same Store results.
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 97-11 (EITF 97-11),
"Accounting for Internal Costs Related to Real Estate Property Acquisitions", we
have expensed all internal pre-acquisition costs from April 1998 to December 31,
1998, totaling approximately $300,000, which has been included in our operating
expenses.
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENT
Our long-term growth plan includes significant development of new
storage centers in markets in which we currently operate. This is primarily due
to our focus on maintaining high quality standards and consistent building
design to develop brand awareness. Implementation of this development strategy
is expected to continue at least through 1999. Each development project
progresses through a series of review processes from initial review, through due
diligence, final review and finally to the land purchase and construction. We
believe the success of this strategy has been greatly enhanced as a result of
the substantial experience we, or our predecessors, have gained through the
development of over one third of our properties.
We opened 24 domestic storage centers in 1998, and, when all phases
are complete, these 24 projects will total approximately 1,206,000 net rentable
square feet with an estimated total cost of $90.6 million. Of the 24 stores
opened, one was developed through our California joint venture, four were
developed through our Tennessee and Florida joint ventures, while another ten
were contributed to Shurgard/Fremont Partners I (SFPI) in which we own a 10%
interest (see NEW DEVELOPMENT FINANCING ARRANGEMENT). We intend to finance the
majority of our on-going development through similar relationships.
The 17 storage centers opened in 1997 (six of which were contributed
to SFP1 and seven of which were developed through our Tennessee and Florida
joint ventures), representing 1,181,000 net rentable square feet, averaged 68%
occupancy for the month of December 1998. These 1997 developments together
generated $4,468,000 in net operating income for the 12 months of 1998. For the
one month ended December 31, 1998 these developments had net operating income of
$487,000 which represents 68% of projected monthly NOI at stabilization. We
estimate these developments opened in 1997 will reach projected stabilized
monthly NOI in an average of 21 to 24 months. The
-32-
<PAGE> 33
proforma average annual yield on the estimated total cost of these projects is
11.5% to 12.5% assuming the projects reach 85% occupancy at proforma rates.
We can give no assurance that these projections regarding the 1997
development projects will occur. Actual occupancy levels and rates could be
lower if we experience competition from other self storage properties and other
storage alternatives in close proximity to our developments. Actual yields may
also be lower if major expenses such as property taxes, labor, and marketing,
among others, increase more than projected.
In addition to the above completed developments, we had 16 storage
centers under construction (five of these are being developed in California and
Florida through joint ventures) as of December 31, 1998. As a general rule, to
limit the risks of development, we do not purchase land until the permitting
process is complete. Construction usually begins shortly after we obtain title
to the land. The following table summarizes domestic development projects in
progress at December 31, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Estimated Completed
Projects Cost of Projects
-------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C>
New Domestic Developments:
Construction in progress 16 $87.3 million
Land purchased pending construction 5 $22.1 million
Expansion of Existing Properties:
Opened during 1998 2 $4.3 million
Construction in progress 6 $10.2 million
</TABLE>
We believe that a long-term strategy of growth through development
will result in superior returns over the long-term. A development strategy,
however, creates a short-term dilution of earnings during the rent-up phase of a
project. Although certain costs, including real estate taxes and interest, are
capitalized during the construction period, net operating income does not
generally exceed interest expense on development projects for at least the first
year of operations. This rent-up deficit for our pro-rata interest in
developments was $1,489,000 (net operating income of $5,467,000 less $6,956,000
of interest at 8.5% interest on invested capital) for 1998 compared to
$2,507,000 in 1997 and $1,931,000 in 1996. The rent-up deficit for a typical
$3.8 million project, assuming it takes 24 months to rent-up and is financed
with debt at 8.5%, is estimated to be approximately $300,000 in the first year
of operations. The total cost of a development varies significantly based on the
cost of the land. The cost of some future projects may be higher than the
typical project described above based on the markets in which we develop those
future sites. The amount of rent-up deficit and the timing of positive cash flow
cannot be predicted with certainty as it is based on a number of factors
including length of rent-up, ability to collect stated rental rates on leased
units, actual operating expenses incurred, and the time of year a property
opens. Another result of this rent-up period is a decrease in our operating
margins as new property expenses are added but the related revenue stream does
not hit stabilized levels until occupancy reaches 85%.
We currently anticipate opening 30-35 domestic developments in 1999
including the 21 listed in the table above. The actual number of projects could
be reduced by zoning and permitting delays outside of our control, increased
competition for sites, delays during construction caused by, among other things,
weather, unforeseen site conditions, labor shortages, personnel turnover,
scheduling problems with contractors, subcontractors or suppliers, or resource
constraints.
In addition to utilizing the experience of our in-house real estate
development personnel, in the past few years we have begun establishing
relationships with quality storage operators outside
-33-
<PAGE> 34
our current markets. We believe that the most efficient way to operate storage
centers is to saturate a market to create brand awareness and allow certain
economies of scale in operation processes and advertisement. These relationships
create an instant presence in a new market as affiliate owned centers begin
using the "Shurgard" name. In exchange for the use of our name, computer systems
and general operations support services, the affiliate pays us an affiliation
fee of 2% of revenue. Additionally, these affiliation agreements provide the
framework for the joint development of additional storage centers, allowing us
to take advantage of the local operator's market knowledge. We have signed three
such affiliation agreements, which include (1) an agreement with a Tennessee
developer that opened three jointly developed centers in 1995, one in 1996, two
in 1997, and two in 1998; (2) an agreement with a Florida developer that opened
five jointly developed centers in 1997, one in 1998, and has four additional
properties under development; and (3) a joint venture with a California
developer that began its first joint developments in 1997 of which one jointly
developed center opened in 1998, and one additional property is under
construction. The California developer does not have an existing presence in the
market, and therefore, we will manage the properties on behalf of the joint
venture. We receive our standard property management fee for this service. (For
further discussion see OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS.)
NEW DEVELOPMENT FINANCING ARRANGEMENT
On May 29, 1998, we formed a partnership, Shurgard/Fremont Partners
I (SFP1), with Fremont Realty Capital L.L.C. (Fremont). The general partners of
SFP1 consist of one of our wholly owned subsidiaries and an affiliate of
Fremont. Through our subsidiary, we have a 10% equity interest and the Fremont
affiliate has a 90% equity interest in SFP1. All major decisions by SFP1 require
approval of both partners. SFP1 has obtained a non-recourse credit facility from
a commercial bank of up to $47.9 million, secured by the properties owned by
SFP1.
Under the terms of the agreements executed in connection with the
formation of SFP1, we contribute properties to SFP1 shortly after construction
is completed. We are reimbursed at cost for all expenses incurred in developing
the properties contributed to SFP1 (including a 5% reimbursement for capitalized
internal costs). Fifteen properties were contributed to SFP1 during 1998. We
were reimbursed $60.4 million related to the contribution of these properties.
SFP1 has granted us an option to acquire all of the properties owned
by SFP1. The purchase option is exercisable at certain times between December
15, 2000 and December 31, 2002, depending upon the performance of the
properties. The purchase price for the properties upon exercise of the option is
based on a 9 1/4 capitalization rate applied to the net operating income of the
properties for the three or four-month period preceding the exercise of the
option. Initially, we are entitled to 10% of SFP1's cash flow, the terms in the
Partnership Agreement increase our equity return to 20% after the partners
receive a specified priority return.
Under a Management Services Agreement, we will act as property
manager for the properties owned by SFP1 and receive a monthly management fee
equal to the greater of $2,000 per property or 5% of gross revenues.
Additionally, we will receive other fees relating to accounting and
administrative services that we will perform on behalf of SFP1.
During the fourth quarter, we reached an agreement in principle with
an institutional investor to form a similar joint venture partnership for the
purpose of acquiring up to $105 million of
-34-
<PAGE> 35
new self-storage properties developed by Shurgard. We anticipate finalizing the
agreement in the first quarter of 1999.
EUROPEAN OPERATIONS
In March 1997, we entered into a joint venture agreement with two
unaffiliated entities. We have a minority interest (9.15%) in this joint
venture, which borrowed $19 million to purchase a majority limited partner
interest in SSC Benelux & Co., SCS (Benelux SCS), thus reducing our equity
position in Benelux SCS from 85.6% to 12.5%. This transaction resulted in the
return of $9.3 million for loans we had made to Benelux SCS. We, together with
one of our partners, have the right to increase our participation in the joint
venture through an equity contribution. In July 1998, we increased our
participation in the joint venture by purchasing an additional interest from a
joint venture partner for $300,000, which raised our equity position in Benelux
SCS to 13.06%. We had invested $6.9 million and $2.2 million in Benelux SCS, for
the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, respectively. As of December 31,
1998, Benelux SCS was operating in Belgium, Sweden, France and the United
Kingdom. As a result of SSCI's investment in Europe, we face certain risks
inherent in international business operations, including currency risks,
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, longer accounts receivable
payment cycles, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations,
potentially adverse tax burdens, obstacles to the repatriation of earnings and
cash, and the burdens of complying with different permitting standards and a
wide variety of foreign laws.
The self-storage industry is not yet well established in much of
Europe; we believe this presents us with the opportunity to become a dominant
player. We are, however, seeing other industry players entering the Europe
markets. Benelux SCS and its subsidiaries have established expansion plans that
focus in four markets: the Benelux region, France, Scandinavia and the UK.
Our pro rata portion of operating losses for European operations was
$412,000, $402,000, and $1,173,000, for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997,
and 1996, respectively. Although the operations of existing stores are
improving, we believe Benelux SCS will continue to produce losses through 2001
as financing costs and start up losses of the additional stores and overhead
costs necessary to carry out current expansion plans will exceed operating
income.
European Development
Our strategy is to quickly dominate markets we enter by building a
network of high quality storage centers that can be managed with economies of
scale. There are few storage centers of acceptable quality available for
acquisition, so our European joint venture has focused on a strategy of in-house
development for most of our European stores. Through this strategy, we are able
to maintain high quality standards and consistent building design to develop
brand and product awareness. Each development project progresses through a
series of review processes from initial review, through due diligence, final
review and finally to the land purchase and construction. We believe the success
of this strategy has been greatly enhanced as a result of the substantial
experience we gained through the development of over 80% of our European
properties, as well as one third of our U.S. properties. We opened seven storage
centers in 1998 and two in 1997. The following table summarizes European
development by country in U.S. dollars:
-35-
<PAGE> 36
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Net
Number of Estimated Rentalable Sq. Ft.
Properties Total Cost when complete
---------- ---------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPENED IN 1998
Belgium 3 $12.1 million 185,000
Sweden 4 $17.8 million 260,000
OPENED IN 1997
Belgium 2 $7.8 million 135,000
</TABLE>
The seven storage centers opened in 1998, will total approximately
445,000 net rentable square feet when all phases are complete and will cost an
estimated $29.9 million. These storage centers averaged 16% occupancy for the
month of December and together generated $28,000 in net operating loss.
Although it is too early to project rent-up periods for these projects, they are
renting up as expected.
The two storage centers opened in 1997, averaged 64% occupancy for
the month of December and together generated $224,000 in net operating income
for the 12 months of 1998. For the month ended December 31, 1998 these
developments had net operating income of $44,000 which represents 59% of
projected monthly NOI at stabilization (as measured in the relevant local
currency). These developments on average appear to be renting up at a quicker
rate than stores opened prior to 1997.
Because of the newness of storage to the European market, the
rent-up period for storage centers developed prior to 1998 has been longer than
that of domestic development projects. During the rent up and initial product
introduction period, rental rates are below those we anticipate at
stabilization. As each center reaches stabilized occupancy, management's focus
will change from increasing occupancy to increasing rates. The proforma average
annual yield on the estimated total cost of the projects in the above table is
11% to 15% assuming the projects reach 85% occupancy at current rates.
There can be no assurance that these projections regarding European
development projects will occur. Assumed occupancy levels and rates could be
adversely affected if we experience competition from other self-storage
properties and other storage alternatives in close proximity to our
developments. Actual yields may also be lower if major expenses such as property
taxes, labor, and marketing, among others, increase more than projected or if
there are significant changes in the exchange rates.
In addition to the above completed developments, we have one
European storage center currently under construction in Sweden, and have
purchased five sites in the U.K. In order to compete for sites in the United
Kingdom, we have departed from our general policy of purchasing land only after
the permitting process is complete. As a result, we have undertaken the
additional risk that we may be unable to complete the permitting process and
cannot sell the property at a profit. The following table summarizes European
development projects in progress at December 31, 1998:
-36-
<PAGE> 37
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF ESTIMATED COMPLETED COST OF ACTUAL COST AT
PROJECTS PROJECTS DECEMBER 31, 1998
--------- --------------------------- -----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
NEW DEVELOPMENTS:
Construction in progress 1 $4.23 million $1.9 million
Land purchased pending construction 5 $34.3 million $17 million
EXPANSION OF EXISTING PROPERTIES:
Construction in progress 2 $1.4 million $0.8 million
</TABLE>
In the current state of the European self storage market, we believe
that a strategy of growth through development will result in superior returns
over the long-term. However, as discussed earlier, this development strategy
creates a short-term dilution of earnings during the rent-up phase of a project.
For further discussion, see DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENT.
We currently anticipate opening 10 to 15 European developments in
1999 including the six listed in the table above. The actual number of projects
could be reduced due to zoning and permitting delays outside of our control,
increased competition for sites, delays during construction caused by, among
other things, weather, unforeseen site conditions, labor shortages, personnel
turnover, scheduling problems with contractors, subcontractors or suppliers, or
resource constraints.
European Acquisitions
During 1997, we purchased three storage centers in France totaling
116,000 net rentable square feet at a total cost of $7.9 million. One of these
storage centers was located in Nice while the other two were located in Paris.
The properties in Paris were recently completed and were still in the rent-up
phase at the time of acquisition.
<TABLE>
RESULTS FOR 1997 ACQUISITIONS
<CAPTION>
US DOLLAR FRENCH FRANCS
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars in thousands YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
except average rent) 1998 1997 1998 1997
-------- -------- ------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rental revenue $ 1,626 $ 436 FF 9,519 FF 2,825
Property operating expenses(1) 1,053 367 6,279 2,378
-------- -------- ------------ --------
Net operating income $ 573 $ 69 FF 3,240 FF 446
======== ======== ============ ========
Avg. annual rent per sq.ft.(2) $ 20.02 $ 19.80 FF 123 FF 119
Avg. sq.ft. occupancy 64% 45% 64% 45%
Total net rentable sq.ft 116,000 116,000 116,000 116,000
# of property-months(3) 33 12 33 12
Purchase price $7.9 million FF 44,200 million
</TABLE>
(1) Includes all direct property expenses. Does not include any allocation of
joint expenses incurred, such as off-site management personnel.
-37-
<PAGE> 38
(2) Average annual rent per square foot is calculated by dividing actual rents
collected by the average number of square feet occupied during the period.
(3) Represents the sum of the number of months we operated each property
during the applicable period
We believe these French stores are on track to reach a yield at
stabilization in excess of 13% (based on achieving 85% occupancy at current
rates). These projections are based on numerous assumptions and actual results
may vary due to uncertainties including the risk that competition from new self
storage facilities or other storage alternatives may cause rents to decline and
may cause occupancy rates to drop. Actual results may differ if increases in
labor, taxes, and other operating and construction expenses occur. Additionally,
there is foreign currency exchange risk.
European Same Store Operations
Our definition for European same stores includes existing facilities
acquired as of January 1 the previous year as well as developed properties that
have been operating a full eight quarters as of the beginning of the fourth
quarter. The definition for European same stores reflects the longer rent-up
period for European storage centers as compared to domestic storage centers. The
following table summarizes same store operating performance for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997.
(dollars in thousands except average rent)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1998 1997 % CHANGE
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rental revenue $ 2,018 $ 1,220 65%
Property operating expenses(1) 897 780 15%
-------- --------
Net operating income $ 1,121 $ 440 154%
======== ========
Avg. annual rent per sq.ft.(2) $ 11.00 $ 9.50 16%
Avg. sq.ft. occupancy 86% 75%
Total net rentable sq.ft 234,000 234,000
# of properties 4 4
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Includes all direct property expenses. Does not include any allocation of
joint expenses incurred by the Company such as off-site management
personnel.
(2) Average annual rent per square foot is calculated by dividing actual rent
collected by the average number of square feet occupied during the period.
In 1998, we increased rental rates of same stores an average of 16%
when measured in U.S. dollars and 19% in local currency. This achievement brings
the rental rates to the levels we anticipated upon investing in the storage
centers and can be linked to increased product awareness in the market, which
was obtained through extensive marketing efforts.
-38-
<PAGE> 39
OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
The following table shows income (loss) from other real estate
investments for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996.
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Containerized storage $(3,133) $(1,423) $ (10)
Joint ventures (135) (172) 82
Participating mortgages 1,639 1,591 1,332
Other partnership investments 1 229 1,967
------- ------- -------
Total $(1,628) $ 225 $ 3,371
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Containerized Storage
We are continually exploring new ways to serve our customers'
storage needs. One of the recent ways we have broadened our ability to meet
customer needs is by bringing storage directly to the customer through
containerized storage. Weatherized 8'x5'x8' storage containers are delivered to
customers for packing. The containers are then picked up and delivered to a
warehouse where they are stored. Customers may access their storage container in
a showroom at the warehouse or have it redelivered to their home. In addition to
the monthly rental charge, service fees may be charged for the transportation of
the container. This business venture, which was initially tested in the Seattle,
WA market, is now operating in five major U.S. markets, including Seattle,
Portland, San Francisco, Atlanta, and Chicago. During 1999, Shurgard Storage To
Go, Inc. (STG) does not intend to open any additional warehouses, but will
concentrate on maximizing revenue growth through effective marketing and pricing
strategies and optimizing warehouse capacity and logistics.
At December 31, 1998, STG had 3,631 containers rented with an
average rental rate of $61 per container. STG has adjusted its rate structures
in order to be more competitive and to maximize revenues.
At December 31, 1998, we had invested $4.5 million in STG. SSCI owns
only nonvoting stock in STG, which is not a qualified REIT Subsidiary and is
subject to corporate level tax. We have committed to lend up to $9 million under
an unsecured five year note to fund negative cash flow during the rent up stage.
At December 31, 1998, $6.3 million was outstanding. We also currently guarantee
$12.8 million in lease obligations. In 1998, our pro rata percentage of STG
losses was $3.1 million. We expect to reduce our pro-rata portion of these
losses to $1.5 million for 1999. This projected 1999 loss is based on several
assumptions including meeting the projected number of container rentals, and
lengthening the average customer rental period. There is of course no assurance
that this expectation will be met as numerous factors affect profitability.
These factors include the possible inability to attract new customers, the
expense of sales and marketing efforts, the potential of new competition (both
containerized and other forms of storage) entering our markets, and the
possibility that customers may not be willing to pay the rates projected.
-39-
<PAGE> 40
Joint Ventures
Pursuant to our affiliation agreements with two storage operators,
we have entered into 17 joint ventures which have developed or acquired 22
properties. Twelve of these properties are located in the Nashville and Memphis,
Tennessee metropolitan area, and 10 are in Orlando, Florida. Our economic
interest in these joint ventures ranges from 50% to 90%. We have guaranteed $14
million of loans, our pro-rata portion of certain joint venture loans. Losses
for these joint ventures totaled $135,000 in 1998 due to the addition of new
properties added during the year offsetting earnings on stabilized properties.
Six new properties were added during 1998, however, five were added late in 1998
and had no significant impact on the operating losses in 1998. In 1997, these
joint ventures had operating losses of $172,000 compared to earnings of $82,000
in 1996. Funds from operations, as defined below, for these joint ventures
totaled $1,174,000 in 1998, $397,000 in 1997 and $234,000 in 1996, respectively.
Performance related to stores developed through these joint ventures is
discussed in DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENT. The table below summarizes certain financial
information related to the joint ventures described above.
(dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998(1)
--------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
JOINT VENTURES
Net operating income $ 2,891 $ 1,129 $ 421
Total assets $ 51,232 $ 34,353 $18,515
Total debt $ 32,292 $ 17,050 $ 7,653
Number of operating property months(2) 166 81 36
Number of operating properties 16 10 3
Number of properties under construction 4 3 5
</TABLE>
(1) Dollar amounts represent our pro rata portion of NOI, assets and debt
based on our ownership percentage.
(2) Represents the sum of the number of months we operated each property
during the applicable period.
We have entered into an agreement with a California developer under
which it will purchase sites in southern California and construct storage
centers on them according to our specifications. Upon completion of the
construction, we will manage the property for, in most cases, two years at which
time the property will be contributed, subject to outstanding debt, into a newly
formed corporation in which we will be the majority shareholder through the
contribution of cash sufficient to pay development costs. The developer's
interest in the newly formed corporation will be based upon a predetermined
formula and the current value of the property. At December 31, 1998, we had
guaranteed $15.6 million in outstanding debt for two properties related to this
agreement and will guarantee additional amounts as future properties are
developed.
-40-
<PAGE> 41
Participating Mortgages
We have $13.3 million invested in three participating mortgage
loans. All three mortgages are non-recourse to the borrower and are secured by
real estate, including four storage centers and office/warehouse space. The
first two mortgages total $11.9 million, bear interest at 8%, and mature in
December 2004. The third loan is for $1.4 million, bears interest at 10%, and
matures in October 1999. Additionally, we receive contingent interest payments
from all the mortgaged properties equal to 50% of both operating cash flow and
distributions from the gain on sale of real property, as defined. We have
options to purchase the properties at established prices, generally exercisable
in 1999 and extending until maturity of the loans.
Other
During 1998, we purchased 18 Limited Partner units in Shurgard
Institutional Fund LP, from unaffiliated third parties, for $22.6 million in
cash ($21.2 million, net of cash received). We now own 22 of 25 units and are
entitled to 88% of this partnership's limited partner distributions. Three out
of these 22 units were purchased in 1997 from an unaffiliated third party, for
$3.7 million in cash. We continue to own a general partnership interest in this
partnership. Due to our majority interest, effective September 24, 1998,
Shurgard Institutional Fund LP is consolidated for financial statement purposes.
Prior to this date, earnings were included in income from other real estate
investments.
During 1997, we purchased from an unaffiliated third party, for $2.1
million in cash, two limited partnership units in Shurgard Institutional Fund LP
II, an affiliated partnership. We now own 5.5 units and are entitled to 57% of
limited partner distributions. Due to our majority interest, effective September
16, 1997, Shurgard Institutional Fund LP II is consolidated for financial
statement purposes. Prior to this date, earnings were included in income from
other real estate investments.
In 1996, we made a tender offer for the limited partnership units in
the IDS Partnerships. On September 13, 1996, we purchased approximately 42%, 32%
and 42% of the outstanding limited partnership units of IDS/Shurgard Income
Growth Partners L.P., IDS/Shurgard Income Growth Partners L.P. II, and
IDS/Shurgard Income Growth Partners L.P. III, respectively, for a total of $40
million. On November 14, 1996, we completed the acquisition by merging with the
IDS Partnerships. For the two months we owned the units of the IDS Partnerships
in 1996, earnings from this investment totaled $1.4 million. These earnings were
included in income from other real estate investments.
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense increased $8.2 million from 1996 to 1998 due to an
increase in the outstanding debt balance. This rise represents borrowings to
purchase partnership units and to fund development of new storage centers and
acquisitions. Additionally, during 1998, we capitalized $7.6 million in interest
related to the construction of storage centers while $3.2 million and $2.8
million were capitalized in 1997 and 1996, respectively.
-41-
<PAGE> 42
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 97-11 (EITF 97-11),
"Accounting for Internal Costs Related to Real Estate Property Acquisitions",
SSCI has expensed all internal pre-acquisition costs from April 1998 to December
31, 1998. Going forward, we expect the impact of this EITF to be immaterial.
On April 3, 1998, the AIPCA Accounting Standards Executive Committee
(AcSEC) issued Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP 98-5), "Reporting on the Costs of
Start-Up Activities", which is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 1998. SOP 98-5 requires start-up activities and organization
expenses to be expensed as incurred. We will implement SOP 98-5 in the first
quarter of 1999. The initial application will be reported as a cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle and will be approximately $1.5 million.
On June 16, 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" (SFAS 133), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June
15, 1999. SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments and hedging activities. Under this statement certain derivatives are
recognized at fair market value and changes in fair market value are recognized
as gains or losses. We are studying this pronouncement to determine its effect,
if any, on our financial statements.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
Funds from operations (FFO), pursuant to the National Association
of Real Estate Investment Trusts' (NAREIT) March, 1995, White Paper on Funds
from Operations, is defined as net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP)
excluding gains or losses from debt restructuring and sales of real estate,
plus depreciation of real estate assets and amortization of intangible assets
exclusive of deferred financing costs. Contributions to FFO from unconsolidated
entities in which the reporting entity holds an active interest are to be
reflected in FFO on the same basis. We believe FFO is a meaningful disclosure
as a supplement to net income because net income implicitly assumes that the
value of assets diminish predictably over time while we believe that real
estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. FFO is
not a substitute for net cash provided by operating activities or net income
computed in accordance with GAAP, nor should it be considered an alternative
indication of our operating performance or liquidity. In addition, FFO is not
comparable to "funds from operations" reported by other REITs that do not
define funds from operations in accordance with the NAREIT definition. The
following table sets forth the calculation of FFO in accordance with the NAREIT
definition (in thousands):
-42-
<PAGE> 43
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income before extraordinary item $ 44,734 $ 42,311 $ 32,785
Preferred dividend (4,690) (3,060)
Depreciation/amortization 33,644 28,243 21,199
Depreciation/amortization from
unconsolidated joint ventures and
subsidiaries (252) (231) 219
Non-recurring revenue/expenses (416) (189)
Deferred financing costs (1,120) (1,105) (1,120)
-------- -------- --------
FFO $ 71,900 $ 65,969 $ 53,083
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
FFO for 1998 increased $5.9 million over 1997 FFO, which had risen
$12.9 million over 1996. As previously discussed, this growth rate reflects the
improved performance of the original portfolio of properties as well as the
addition of properties over the three years through acquisitions and
developments. Assuming we finance 1999 development through off balance sheet
agreements and STG meets expectation in 1999, we expect FFO to increase 10-11%
in 1999. This expectation regarding FFO growth constitutes a forward-looking
statement within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and
is based on several assumptions. If any of these assumptions are not satisfied
or prove to be incorrect, actual results could differ materially from those
indicated in the statement. The risks and uncertainties that may cause these
assumptions and this forward-looking statement to prove to be incorrect include
the risks that competition from new self storage facilities or other storage
alternatives may cause rents to decline, occupancy rates to drop, or delays in
rent up of newly developed properties. We may experience increases in labor,
taxes, marketing and other operating and construction expenses, and litigation
may materially decrease our late fee revenue. For a discussion of the factors
that might cause these assumptions not to occur see DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENT and
CONTAINERIZED STORAGE.
INVESTING TRANSACTIONS
During 1998, we invested $24.9 million in the acquisition of eight
storage centers, $111.9 million in domestic development and expansion projects,
$44.1 million in European development projects, and $5.1 million in capital
improvements to our existing portfolio. The $9.5 million increase in other real
estate investments reflects primarily the $9.3 million invested in joint
ventures and the $0.2 million invested in our containerized storage operation.
Additionally, during 1998, loans to affiliates increased $6 million due the loan
we made to our containerized storage operation.
During 1997, we invested $65.6 million in the acquisition of 23
storage centers, $90.4 million in domestic development and expansion projects,
$2.2 million in European development projects, and $5.3 million in capital
improvements to our existing portfolio. The $17.0 million increase in other real
estate investments reflects primarily $3.7 million invested in limited
partnership units, $6.6 million in joint ventures, and $4.2 million invested in
Shurgard Storage To Go, Inc.
-43-
<PAGE> 44
On September 13, 1996, pursuant to a tender offer, we purchased
limited partnership units in the IDS Partnerships totaling approximately $40
million. This purchase was funded through our line of credit. We owned these
units until November 14, 1996 when we completed the merger with the IDS
Partnerships. Under the terms of the agreement between the Company and the
Partnerships, we issued 2,462,414 shares of Class A Common Stock based on the
partners' interest in the IDS Partnerships' net asset value of $106.6 million
($121.8 million in storage centers less net liabilities of $15.2 million either
assumed or paid off at closing) as defined in the agreement. Total cash paid for
this acquisition was $58.6 million.
Additionally, during 1996, we invested $6.4 million in the
acquisition of three storage centers, $47.9 million in domestic development and
expansion projects, $9.3 million in European development projects, and $3.7
million in capital improvements to our existing portfolio. The $11.1 million
increase in other real estate investments reflects primarily $2.1 million
invested in limited partnership units, $9 million invested in joint ventures.
Under the Management Company Merger Agreement, we were contingently
obligated to issue additional shares as consideration for certain partnership
interests held by the Management Company which were not valued at the time of
the merger. Subsequent to year end, we issued 145,286 shares related to this
obligation. Additional shares may be issued over the next two years as
consideration for similar interests in two other partnerships.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
In addition to continued investments in acquisitions and
developments, we invest in improving our current portfolio of real estate.
Investments in existing storage properties include primarily expansions,
conversions (i.e., size of units or climate control) and certain recurring
improvements to roofs, pavement, sealant and other items such as security
upgrades that we believe are necessary to maintain our quality standards and our
ability to generate premium returns.
Of the $5 million in capital improvements expended during 1998
(excluding signage), $1.8 million was for roofs, pavement and sealant,
representing approximately $.09 per net rentable square foot, while $2.2 million
out of a total of $4.5 million was spent for these items during 1997
representing approximately $0.13 per net rentable square foot. Specifically
identified capital improvements expected for 1999 total $3.4 to $4.9 million, of
which $1.5 to $3.0 million represent roofs, pavement and sealant. During 1996,
we completed an extensive research and evaluation program through which we
selected an updated logo. In order to maintain our brand awareness across all
Shurgard businesses, we implemented a process to replace signs, awnings, etc. to
incorporate our new logo over 1997 and 1998. During 1998, we re-signed 132
stores at a cost of about $1.1 million. There are five properties left to
re-sign in 1999 at an estimated cost of $40,000.
FINANCING TRANSACTIONS
In December 1998, we raised net proceeds after offering costs of
$48.1 million through the sale of 2 million shares of Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock. These preferred shares require quarterly
distribution payments totaling 8.7% per year and are callable at our option
after five years at a redemption price of $25 per share.
-44-
<PAGE> 45
Net borrowings under the domestic line of credit during 1998 totaled
$37 million. Draws on the line were used to fund acquisitions, purchases of
partnership units, development activity, and general corporate purposes. We have
an unsecured domestic line of credit to borrow up to $150 million through
September 1999 with the option to extend until September 2000. The spread over
LIBOR varies based on the terms of the agreement. As of December 31, 1998, $81.5
million was outstanding, and the interest rate spread was 95 basis points over
LIBOR.
Shurgard/Fremont Partners I (SFP1) has obtained a non-recourse
credit facility from a commercial bank to borrow up to $47.9 million of which
$42.8 million was outstanding at December 31, 1998. We have a 10% equity
interest in this partnership. The note matures May 2001, is secured by the 15
properties owned by SFP1, and requires monthly payments of interest only at 200
basis points above LIBOR. As of December 31, 1998, the interest rate was 7.25%.
We have swap agreements in effect for each borrowing which have a weighted
average interest rate of 7.57% as of December 31, 1998.
During 1998, we obtained additional available credit under our
European lines to fund development and operating cash needs. At December 31,
1998, we had seven European credit lines (denominated in local currencies) to
borrow up to a total of $14.7 million of which $13.5 million was outstanding.
The weighted average interest rate on these lines at December 31, 1998, was
5.7%.
Additionally, at December 31, 1998, Benelux SCS had notes totaling
$56.9 million with a weighted average interest rate of 7.44%. The notes are from
an affiliated joint venture in which we own a 9.15% interest and mature December
31, 2000. Benelux SCS debt is non-recourse. As a general partner, we are
contingently liable for the debt of a joint venture, which at December 31, 1998
totaled $23.1 million.
In January and February 1997, we raised net proceeds after offering
costs of $59.3 million through the sale of 2.2 million shares of Class A Common
Stock. In April 1997, we raised $50 million ($48.2 million in net proceeds)
through the sale of 2 million shares of 8.8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock. These preferred shares require quarterly distribution payments
totaling 8.8% per year and are callable at our option after five years. In
September 1997, we raised net proceeds after offering costs of $18.9 million
through the sale of 727,080 shares of Class A Common Stock.
Additionally, during 1997, we issued $100 million in senior
unsecured notes, $50 million of which are seven year notes due April 2004
bearing interest at 7.5% and $50 million of which are ten year notes due April
2007 bearing interest at 7.625%. The notes require semi-annual interest due
April 25th and October 25th. Net proceeds totaled $98.7 million. Benelux SCS
incurred approximately $9 million in additional debt related to the development
and acquisition of storage centers.
Net repayments on the domestic lines of credit during 1997 totaled
$83.5 million as proceeds from senior unsecured notes were used to repay
previously outstanding balances. At December 31, 1997, approximately $44.5
million was outstanding, and the spread was 100 basis points over LIBOR.
At December 31, 1997, we had four European credit lines (denominated
in local currencies) with a total available of $13.0 million of which all was
outstanding. Additionally, during 1997, we received a payment of $9.3 million
for loans we had made to Benelux SCS.
-45-
<PAGE> 46
During 1996, we borrowed $130.1 million under our lines of credit,
both domestic and foreign, to finance development and investment activity
described above as well as for general corporate purposes.
SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM LIQUIDITY
Cash balances remained stable from December 31, 1997 to December 31,
1998 as capital expenditures were funded primarily through cash flow and
financing and equity transactions described above. The following table
summarizes certain information regarding our liquidity and capital resources:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Debt to total assets 37% 31% 34%
Total market capitalization(1) $1,274 million $1,179 million $1,033 million
Debt to total market capitalization(1) 33% 25% 26%
Weighted avg. interest rate(2) 7.2% 7.58% 7.68%
Available lines of credit -Domestic $69 million $56 million $46 million
Available lines of credit- Europe $1.2 million None avail. $4.5 million
</TABLE>
- -----------
(1) Total market capitalization is based on the closing market price of the
Class A Common Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, and the Series C Preferred
Stock multiplied by their respective total number of outstanding shares
plus total debt.
(2) Represents domestic weighted average interest rate on the domestic line of
credit
Our total debt at December 31, 1998 was $426 million, of which $339
million is fixed rate debt or variable rate debt fixed by swap agreements.
Although we limit our use of variable rate debt, at times balances could be
significant enough that fluctuations in interest rates may impact our earnings.
We believe that we will be able to minimize the impact of such rate fluctuations
through the use of interest rate caps, refinancing or other strategies.
During the past year, there has been a net outflow of capital from
the REIT sector which has resulted in depressed common equity prices for many
REITs, including us. As a result, we do not believe it is an attractive time to
raise common equity. Accordingly, we anticipate funding 1999 growth and our
on-going development program primarily through a combination of our lines of
credit, long term debt, preferred equity, and alternative capital sources. We
intend to pursue joint ventures with private institutions and public pension
funds to provide these alternative sources of capital. Additionally, we
anticipate reducing our payout ratio in order to retain cash flow for growth. We
believe that our cash flow in 1999 will be sufficient to make required principal
payments and distribution payments in accordance with REIT requirements. Cash
provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996 was $77.9 million, $78.1 million, and $48.1 million, respectively.
-46-
<PAGE> 47
REIT QUALIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS
As a REIT, we are not required to pay federal income tax on annual
taxable income that we currently distribute to our shareholders, provided that
we distribute an amount equal to at least 95% of our taxable income. Such
distributions must be made in the taxable year to which they relate or in the
following taxable year if declared before the REIT timely files its tax return
for such years and is paid on or before the first regular distribution payment
date after such declaration. For the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997,
7.1% and 5.8% of distributions were return of capital, while none of the 1996
distributions were return of capital.
As a REIT, we must derive at least 95% of our total gross income
from specified classes of income related to real property, distributions,
interest or certain gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or other
securities. Our revenue from truck rentals, sales of locks and boxes and
management services performed for other owners of properties do not qualify
under this 95% gross income test. Such nonqualifying income was approximately 3%
of gross revenue in 1998 and we expect to meet the 95% test in 1999. Our
acquisition of additional properties will tend to reduce the percentage of
nonqualifying income, while additional management contracts, including those
with off balance sheet joint ventures and partnerships, and the sales of
properties from the existing portfolio will tend to increase the percentage of
nonqualifying income. While we intend to manage our activities so that we
continue to satisfy the 95% test in the future, we can provide no assurance that
nonqualifying income will not exceed 5% in future years.
YEAR 2000
We are continuing the process of identifying our potential risks
relating to the Year 2000 issue in both our information technology and
non-information technology systems, and are implementing solutions to mitigate
those risks as they are identified. We expect to complete our evaluation by
June 30, 1999 and believe that we will be successful in implementing the
identified solutions in a timely manner.
Our risks relating to the Year 2000 are in the areas of internal
systems, external interface systems and third-party service providers. We
recently replaced most of our internal systems for reasons other than Year 2000
issues, and as a result very few systems needed to be replaced as a result of
our Year 2000 compliance program. We estimate that our total cost to replace
noncompliant systems will be approximately $400,000 to $500,000. Through
December 31, 1998, we have spent approximately $110,000 to replace our network
software and 30 out of 51 of our older, non-compliant gate control systems at
certain of our stores. We estimate that the remaining gates will be replaced by
September 1999. Systems still under evaluation include certain computer hardware
and our payroll system.
We have been contacting third parties with whom we have material
relationships to attempt to determine their preparedness with respect to Year
2000 issues and to analyze the risks to us if they experience significant
business interruptions as a result of Year 2000 noncompliance. Through this
process, we have confirmed that several of our external interface systems and
third party service providers, including our primary bank systems, our transfer
agent, and our employee benefits administrator, are now Year 2000 compliant or
have a plan to achieve compliance within a reasonable time frame. We are
continuing to evaluate the remaining external systems and expect to complete
this evaluation by June 30, 1999. Should these external parties not perform the
adjustments they have indicated are necessary, we could experience
inefficiencies in operations or additional costs associated with fixing the
problem or changing vendors.
We believe the most likely worst-case scenarios that we might
confront with respect to the Year 2000 issues have to do with the possible
failure of third party systems over which we have no control, such as, but not
limited to, power and telephone services. We are currently developing a specific
Year 2000 contingency plan to mitigate exposure to third party system failures.
The statements above regarding our expectations and estimates
relating to the Year 2000 issue constitute forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are based on several assumptions. If any of these
assumptions are not satisfied or prove to be incorrect, our actual experience
could differ materially from that indicated in the forward-looking statements.
The risks and uncertainties that may cause these assumptions to not be correct
include, among others, whether we have correctly identified our Year 2000
issues and whether third-party providers adequately address their Year 2000
issues in a timely fashion.
ITEM 7A - QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE AND FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK
Our primary market risks are interest rate exposure and foreign
currency exchange rate exposure. We do not enter into speculative derivative
transactions or leveraged swap agreements. The derivative instruments that we
own are not held as investments and it is our intent to hold such instruments
for their respective terms. Therefore, changes in their values will not have a
significant effect on our operations, cash flows or financial position.
We have foreign currency exposures related to the construction,
acquisition, and operation of storage centers in countries outside the US to
the extent such activities are financed with financial instruments or equity
denominated in non-functional currencies. Since all foreign debt is denominated
in the corresponding functional currency, our currency exposure is limited to
our equity investment in those countries. Countries in which we have exposure
to foreign currency fluctuations include Belgium, France, Sweden, and the
United Kingdom. Our equity position in these foreign operations at December 31,
1998 was $1.85 million.
The table below provides information about our derivative financial
instruments and other financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in
interest rates, including loans to shareholders, debt obligations and interest
rate swaps. For loans to shareholders, the table presents contractual principal
cash flows to be received and the weighted average interest rates. For debt
obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted
average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Debt obligations are
aggregated by functional currency and disclosed in U.S. dollars equivalents
using the exchange rate at
-47-
<PAGE> 48
December 31, 1998. The actual cash flows are payable in Belgian francs (BEF),
French francs (FF), Swedish kroner (SK), and British pounds (BPS), as indicated
in parentheses. Weighted average variable interest rates are based on implied
forward rates in the yield curve at the reporting date. For interest rate swaps,
the table presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by
contractual maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the
contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract.
-48-
<PAGE> 49
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands)
Expected Maturity There-
Date 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 after Total Fair Value
- ------------------- --------- -------- --------- ------- ------- --------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
LIABILITIES
Lines of Credit:
Fixed Rate (FF) $ 918 $ 918 $ 1,001
Interest rate 7.86% 7.86% 7.86% 7.86%
Variable Rate (US$) $ 81,450 $ 81,450 $ 81,450
Interest rate 5.96%
Variable Rate (BEF) $ 10,568 $ 10,568 $ 10,568
Interest rate 4.22% 4.31% 4.41%
Variable Rate (FF) $ 574 $ 1,518 $2,092 $ 2,093
Interest rate 4.48% 4.57% 4.66% 4.78% 4.91% 5.12%
Notes Payable:
Fixed Rate (US$) $ 120 $ 29 $123,965 $ 29 $7,285 $100,047 $231,475 $239,156
Interest rate 7.91% 7.91% 7.91% 7.50% 7.50% 7.57%
Fixed Rate (BEF) 0 $25,844 $ 25,844 $ 26,846
Interest rate 7.44% 7.44%
Fixed Rate (FF) 0 $ 1,733 $1,733 $ 1,800
Interest rate 7.44% 7.44%
Fixed Rate (SK) 0 $21,748 $ 21,748 $ 22,391
Interest rate 7.44% 7.44%
Fixed Rate (BPS) 0 $ 7,556 $7,556 $ 7,577
Interest rate 7.44% 7.44%
Variable Rate (US$) $ 42,753 $ 42,753 $ 42,753
Interest rate 7.16% 7.18% 7.25%
EQUITY
Loans to
shareholders 0 $665 $1,836 $1,339 $ 162 $ 4,002 $ 3,254
Interest rate 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
INTEREST RATE
DERIVATIVES
Interest Rate Swaps:
Variable to Fixed (US$) $ 42,753 $ 42,753 $ (1,136)
Avg. pay rate 7.57% 7.57% 7.57%
Avg. received rate 7.16% 7.18% 7.25%
Variable to Fixed
(BEF) $ 7,086 $ 7,086 $ (26)
Avg. pay rate 6.07%
Avg. received rate 4.22%
</TABLE>
-49-
<PAGE> 50
ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
----------- -----------
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Storage centers:
Land $ 212,154 $ 168,076
Buildings and equipment, net 751,258 636,168
Construction in progress 81,043 49,484
----------- -----------
Total storage centers 1,044,455 853,728
Other real estate investments 33,057 38,522
Cash and cash equivalents 9,474 7,248
Restricted cash and investments 6,864 7,028
Other assets 60,057 48,962
----------- -----------
Total assets $ 1,153,907 $ 955,488
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 41,201 $ 31,150
Lines of credit 95,028 57,477
Notes payable 331,109 239,494
----------- -----------
Total liabilities 467,338 328,121
Minority interest in other real estate investments 34,759 18,675
Commitments and contingencies (Notes C, E, I and O)
Shareholders' equity:
Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
$0.001 par value: 2,300,000 authorized;
2,000,000 shares issued and outstanding;
liquidation preference 48,056 48,056
Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
$0.001 par value: 2,000,000 authorized;
2,000,000 shares issued and outstanding;
liquidation preference 48,115
Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value;
120,000,000 authorized; 28,677,367
and 28,431,826 shares issued and outstanding
605,484 595,269
Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par value;
500,000 shares authorized, 154,604
issued and outstanding;
net of loans to shareholders of $4,002
(1,086) (1,086)
Accumulated net income less distributions (47,312) (31,452)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (1,447) (2,095)
----------- -----------
Total shareholders' equity 651,810 608,692
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 1,153,907 $ 955,488
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
-50-
<PAGE> 51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR YEAR YEAR
ENDED ENDED ENDED
DEC. 31, DEC. 31, DEC. 31,
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE:
Rental $ 158,989 $ 137,746 $ 103,784
Other real estate investments income (loss) (1,628) 225 3,371
Property management 1,893 2,463 3,244
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenue 159,254 140,434 110,399
EXPENSES:
Operating 46,421 40,278 30,889
Depreciation and amortization 33,644 28,243 21,199
Real estates taxes 13,195 11,295 8,898
General, administrative and other 4,578 3,956 4,351
--------- --------- ---------
Total expenses 97,838 83,772 65,337
--------- --------- ---------
Income from operations 61,416 56,662 45,062
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense (21,076) (17,096) (12,829)
Interest and other income 1,431 1,481 604
--------- --------- ---------
Other income (expense), net (19,645) (15,615) (12,225)
Minority interest 2,963 1,264 (52)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 44,734 $ 42,311 $ 32,785
========= ========= =========
Net income per common share:
Basic $ 1.40 $ 1.40 $ 1.39
========= ========= =========
Diluted $ 1.39 $ 1.40 $ 1.39
========= ========= =========
Distributions per common share:
Basic $ 1.95 $ 1.91 $ 1.41
========= ========= =========
Diluted $ 1.95 $ 1.91 $ 1.41
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
-51-
<PAGE> 52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLASS A CLASS B LOANS TO
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK CLASS B
------------------ ------------------- ---------------- ------------
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHAREHOLDERS
------ --------- ------ --------- ------ ------- ------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, Jan. 1, 1996 23,039 $ 452,852 155 $2,916 $ (4,002)
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation
Total comprehensive income
Issuance of common stock 2,470 63,944
Distributions
----- --------- ------ --------- --- ------- ---------
Balance, Dec. 31 1996 25,509 516,796 155 2,916 (4,002)
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation
Total comprehensive income
Issuance of Series B
Preferred Stock 2,000 48,056
Issuance of common stock 2,923 78,473
Distributions:
Preferred
Common
----- --------- ------ --------- --- ------- ---------
Balance, Dec. 31, 1997 2,000 48,056 28,432 595,269 155 2,916 (4,002)
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation
Total comprehensive income
Issuance of Series C
Preferred Stock 2,000 48,115
Issuance of Common stock 245 10,215
Distributions:
Preferred
Common
----- --------- ------ --------- --- ------- ---------
Balance, Dec. 31, 1998 4,000 $ 96,171 28,677 $ 605,484 155 $ 2,916 $ (4,002)
===== ========= ====== ========= === ======= =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACCUMULATED NET ACCUMULATED
INCOME LESS OTHER
DISTRIBUTIONS COMPREHENSIVE
AMOUNT INCOME TOTAL
---------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, Jan. 1, 1996 $ (17,270) $ (54) $ 434,442
Comprehensive income:
Net income 32,785 32,785
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation (454) (454)
---------
Total comprehensive income 32,331
Issuance of common stock 63,944
Distributions (32,714) (32,714)
---------- --------- ---------
Balance, Dec. 31 1996 (17,199) (508) 498,003
Comprehensive income:
Net income 42,311 42,311
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation (1,587) (1,587)
---------
Total comprehensive income 40,724
Issuance of Series B
Preferred Stock 48,056
Issuance of common stock 78,473
Distributions:
Preferred (3,060) (3,060)
Common (53,504) (53,504)
---------- --------- ---------
Balance, Dec. 31, 1997 (31,452) (2,095) 608,692
Comprehensive income:
Net income 44,734 44,734
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation 648 648
---------
Total comprehensive income 45,382
Issuance of Series C
Preferred Stock 48,115
Issuance of Common stock 10,215
Distributions:
Preferred (4,690) (4,690)
Common (55,904) (55,904)
---------- --------- ---------
Balance, Dec. 31, 1998 $ (47,312) $ (1,447) $ 651,810
========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
-52-
<PAGE> 53
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR YEAR YEAR
ENDED ENDED ENDED
DEC. 31, DEC. 31, DEC. 31,
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 44,734 $ 42,311 $ 32,785
Adjustments to reconcile earnings to
net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization 33,645 28,243 21,199
Other (294) (189)
Loss from other real estate investments 4,092 1,771
Minority interest in earnings from
investments in other real estate investments (2,959) (1,264) 52
Changes in operating accounts:
Restricted cash 164 (214) (1,263)
Other assets (4,682) 4,515 (3,108)
Accounts payable and other liabilities 4,350 1,925 2,068
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 79,050 77,098 51,733
--------- --------- ---------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of real estate and equipment 2,000 482
Purchase of other real estate investments (9,498) (16,993) (11,105)
Purchase of non-competition agreements
and other amortizable assets (3,175) (1,483) (1,055)
Distributions in excess of earnings
from other real estate investments 5,860 205 275
Purchase of units of an affiliated partnership (21,181)
Investment in limited partnerships (1,467) (58,644)
(Increase) decrease in loans to affiliates (5,950) 1,010 (3,668)
Construction, acquisition and improvements
to storage centers (186,042) (163,462) (67,306)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (217,986) (181,708) (141,503)
--------- --------- ---------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings, net 48,115 48,056
Proceeds from common stock offering, net 78,173
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and
dividend reinvestment plan 10,199 300 167
Distributions paid (60,594) (56,564) (43,383)
Net proceeds from (payments on) lines of credit 37,024 (83,520) 130,092
Proceeds from notes payable 90,765 107,700 315
Payments of financing costs (1,166) (1,342)
Principal payments on notes payable (26) (456)
Contributions by minority partners 17,525 7,357 733
Return of capital invested in Europe 9,272
Distributions to minority partners (748) (813) (142)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities 141,094 108,619 87,326
Net effect of translation on cash 68
--------- --------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,226 4,009 (2,444)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 7,248 3,239 5,683
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 9,474 $ 7,248 $ 3,239
========= ========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized $ 20,502 $ 19,209 $ 15,276
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING INFORMATION:
Liabilities incurred in connection with the
construction of storage centers $ 11,035 $ 6,056 $ 9,008
</TABLE>
-53-
<PAGE> 54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A - ORGANIZATION
Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (SSCI) was organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware on July 23, 1993, to serve as a vehicle for investments
in, and ownership of, a professionally managed, internationally diverse real
estate portfolio consisting primarily of self-service storage properties which
provide month-to-month leases for business and personal use. We intend to
qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT) as defined in Section 856 of
the Internal Revenue Code. On March 24, 1995, we became self-advised and
self-administered after acquiring Shurgard Incorporated (the Management Company)
through a merger. On May 14, 1997, we were reincorporated in the State of
Washington.
NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation: The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of SSCI and its domestic and foreign subsidiaries. All
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Effective December 31, 1998, we adopted Statements of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" (SFAS 130) and
No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information"
(SFAS 131). SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components. SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for
determining an entity's operating segments and the type and level of financial
information to be disclosed in both annual and interim financial statements. It
also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic areas and major customers (see NOTE M).
On June 16, 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" (SFAS 133), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June
15, 1999. SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments and hedging activities. Under this statement certain derivatives are
recognized at fair market value and changes in fair market value are recognized
as gains or losses. We are studying this pronouncement to determine its effect,
if any, on our financial statements.
On April 3, 1998, the AIPCA Accounting Standards Executive Committee
(AcSEC) issued Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP 98-5), "Reporting on the Costs of
-54-
<PAGE> 55
Start-Up Activities", which is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 1998. SOP 98-5 requires start-up activities and organization
expenses to be expensed as incurred. We will implement SOP 98-5 in the first
quarter of 1999. The initial application will be reported as a cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle of approximately $1.5 million.
Storage centers: Storage centers are recorded at cost. Depreciation
on buildings and equipment is recorded on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives which range from three to 33 years.
Other real estate investments: We consolidate the accounts of those
joint ventures in which we have effective control as evidenced by, among other
factors, a majority interest in the investment and the ability to cause a sale
of assets, or in which we have a continuing interest. All other investments in
joint ventures are accounted for on the equity method and are included in other
real estate investments. As of December 31, 1998, investments accounted for
under the equity method included 19 joint ventures and Shurgard Storage to Go,
our containerized storage business. Also, included in other real estate
investments are participating mortgages which are accounted for as loans.
Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of money market
instruments and securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Restricted cash and investments: Restricted cash and investments
consist of cash deposits and securities held in trust in connection with certain
notes payable. Restricted cash deposits represent expense reserves required by
lenders. Restricted securities (Note H), per the loan agreement, must be held to
maturity and thus are carried at amortized cost. The premium is amortized over
the estimated remaining life of the security using the constant yield method.
Other assets: Other assets include financing costs, non-competition
agreements, and goodwill, which are presented net of accumulated amortization of
$14,788,000 and $10,718,000 as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Financing costs are amortized on the effective interest method over the life of
the related debt and the related expense is included in amortization.
Non-competition agreements and goodwill are amortized over their estimated
useful lives which range from three to 30 years. Also, included in other assets
are loans to affiliates.
Federal income taxes: To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute
annually at least 95% of our taxable income and meet certain other requirements.
Additionally, as a REIT, we will not be subject to federal income taxes to the
extent of distributions. We were not required to pay any federal income tax in
1996 or 1997 and we intend to make elections regarding distributions such that
we will not pay federal taxes for 1998. As a result, no provision for federal
income taxes has been made in our financial statements. We are subject to
certain international and state income taxes as well as certain franchise taxes;
however, these taxes are currently immaterial.
-55-
<PAGE> 56
Foreign exchange: The consolidated financial statements are prepared
in United States dollars. Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiary and
its subsidiaries are denominated in foreign currencies and are translated to
United States dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet date.
Revenue, costs and expenses for this subsidiary are translated using an average
exchange rate over the applicable reporting period. Net translation gain or loss
is included in other comprehensive income.
In order to mitigate our currency exchange and interest rate risk,
the Board of Directors has authorized us to contract with financial institutions
for hedging, exchanging, or entering into one or more swap transactions up to
the full amount of capital used outside the United States. Our policy
specifically prohibits us from entering into any such contract solely to secure
profit by speculating on the direction of currency exchange rates if unrelated
to capital borrowed, lent or invested by us.
Revenue recognition: Revenue is recognized when earned under accrual
accounting principles.
Valuation of long-lived assets: Using our best estimates based on
reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, we review storage
centers and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of our assets might not be
recoverable. At December 31, 1998, no assets had been written down.
Financial instruments: The carrying values reflected on the balance
sheet at December 31, 1998, reasonably approximate the fair value of cash and
cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable and other liabilities. We
estimate that the fair value of loans to shareholders is $3.3 million. Based on
the borrowing rates currently available to us for bank loans with similar terms
and average maturities, we estimate the fair value of fixed rate long-term debt
including swap arrangements to be $349.8 million.
-56-
<PAGE> 57
Environmental costs: Our policy is to accrue environmental
assessments and/or remediation costs when it is probable that such efforts will
be required and the related costs can be reasonably estimated. The majority of
our real estate facilities have undergone independent environmental
investigations and our policy is to have such investigations conducted on all
new real estate acquired. Although there can be no assurance that there is not
environmental contamination at our facilities of which we are unaware, we are
not aware of any such contamination of any of our facilities which individually
or in aggregate would be material to our business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
NOTE C - STORAGE CENTERS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, DEC. 31,
1998 1997
----------- -----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Land $ 212,154 $ 168,076
Buildings 827,184 689,366
Equipment & other 30,601 21,428
----------- -----------
1,069,939 878,870
Less accumulated depreciation (106,527) (74,626)
----------- -----------
963,412 804,244
Construction in progress, including related
land of $24,801 and $21,117, respectively
81,043 49,484
----------- -----------
$ 1,044,455 $ 853,728
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
We have entered into 35 construction contracts for developments of
new or improvements to current storage centers. Outstanding commitments under
these contracts total $29.7 million. In 1998, 1997 and 1996, we capitalized
approximately $7.6 million, $3.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively, of
interest related to the development of storage centers.
-57-
<PAGE> 58
NOTE D - ACQUISITIONS
In 1997, we purchased, for $3.7 million in cash, three limited
partnership units in Shurgard Institutional Fund LP, an affiliated partnership.
In July 1998, we purchased an additional eighteen Limited Partner units for
$22.6 million in cash ($21.2 million, net of cash received). All purchases were
from unaffiliated third parties. Effective July 1, 1998, we owned 22 of 25 units
and are entitled to 88% of this partnership's limited partner distributions. As
this represents a majority interest, Shurgard Institutional Fund LP has been
consolidated for financial statement purposes since July 1998. We continue to
own a general partnership interest in this partnership.
In September 1997, we purchased from an unaffiliated third party,
for $2.1 million in cash, 1.9 limited partnership units in Shurgard
Institutional Fund LP II, an affiliated partnership. We own a total of 5.4 units
and are entitled to 57% of LP distributions. We continue to own a general
partnership interest in this partnership. Due to our majority interest, Shurgard
Institutional Fund LP II has been consolidated for financial statement purposes
since September 1997.
On September 13, 1996, pursuant to a tender offer, we purchased
approximately 42%, 32% and 42% of the outstanding limited partnership units of
three affiliated public partnerships (the IDS Partnerships) for a total of
approximately $40 million, funded through our line of credit. On November 14,
1996, we completed the acquisition of the IDS Partnerships through a merger with
the IDS partnerships, for 2,462,414 shares of Class A Common Stock. This
transaction was treated as a purchase for accounting purposes. A summary of the
assets and liabilities acquired in this transaction are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Storage centers $ 121,780
Debt repaid by SSCI at closing (13,639)
Other assets 644
Total liabilities (2,207)
---------
$ 106,578
=========
</TABLE>
-58-
<PAGE> 59
The following unaudited pro forma statements of income represent our
results of operations for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, as if the
properties acquired during 1997 and the IDS Partnerships had been acquired on
January 1, 1996. The pro forma results do not necessarily indicate the actual
results that would have been obtained, nor are they necessarily indicative of
the future operations of the combined businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DEC. 31, DEC. 31,
1997 1996
----------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue and other income $ 146,704 $ 136,836
Operations expenses (56,115) (53,613)
Depreciation and amortization (29,181) (26,411)
Interest expense (19,734) (22,027)
--------- ---------
Net income $ 41,674 $ 34,785
========= =========
Net income per share $ 1.38 $ 1.36
========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTE E - OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, DEC. 31,
1998 1997
-------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Investments in participating mortgages $ 13,325 $ 13,220
Investments in joint ventures 19,778 16,696
Investments in limited partnerships 5,761
Investment in containerized storage
business (46) 2,845
-------- --------
$ 33,057 $ 38,522
======== ========
</TABLE>
We invested $13.3 million in three participating mortgage loans. All
three mortgages are non-recourse to the borrower and are secured by real estate,
including four storage centers and office/warehouse space. The first two
mortgages total $11.9 million, bear interest at 8%, and mature in December 2004.
The third loan is for $1.4 million, bears interest at 10%, and matures in
October 1999. Additionally, we receive contingent interest payments from the
mortgaged properties equal to 50% of both operating cash flow and distributions
from the gain on sale of real property, in accordance with the terms of the
applicable agreements. We have options to purchase the properties at established
prices, generally exercisable in 1999 and extending until maturity of the loans.
-59-
<PAGE> 60
Pursuant to our affiliation agreements with two storage operators,
we have entered into 17 joint ventures which have developed or acquired 22
properties. Twelve of these properties are located in the Nashville and Memphis,
Tennessee metropolitan area, and 10 are in Orlando, Florida. Our economic
interest in these joint ventures ranges from 50% to 90%. We have guaranteed $14
million of loans, our pro rata portion of certain joint venture loans. The
financial results for these projects are not consolidated in our financial
statements because the affiliation agreement allows the local operator to
control the daily operations of the property, and all significant investment
decisions require the approval of both parties regardless of ownership
percentage.
We have entered into an agreement with a third developer under which
it will purchase sites in southern California and construct storage centers on
them according to our specifications. Upon completion of the construction, we
will manage the property for, in most cases, two years at which time the
property will be contributed, subject to outstanding debt, into a newly formed
corporation in which we will be the majority shareholder through the
contribution of cash sufficient to pay development costs. The developer's
interest in the company will be based upon a predetermined formula and the then
current value of the property. At December 31, 1998, we had guaranteed $15.6
million in outstanding debt for four properties related to this agreement and
will guarantee additional amounts as future properties are developed.
Investments in limited partnership units at December 31, 1997,
consisted of minority holdings in two partnerships. Acquisition of additional
limited partnership units during 1997 and 1998 made us the majority owner, and
for 1998 these investments are consolidated in our financial statements.
(see further discussion in NOTE D - ACQUISITIONS).
As of December 31, 1998, we had invested $4.5 million in Shurgard
Storage to Go, Inc. (STG ), a containerized storage business. Our investment was
offset by our portion of STG losses resulting in a net liability of $46,000. We
have committed to lend STG up to $9 million under an unsecured five year note of
which $6.3 million is outstanding and included in other assets as of December
31, 1998. The outstanding principal bears interest at the 12 month London
Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus 100 basis points per annum, and is due July
15, 2002. Additionally, we have currently guaranteed $12.8 million in lease
obligations. We own only nonvoting stock in this start-up venture which is not a
qualified REIT subsidiary and is subject to corporate level tax.
-60-
<PAGE> 61
NOTE F - EUROPEAN OPERATIONS
In March 1997, we entered into a joint venture agreement with two
unaffiliated entities. We have a minority interest in this joint venture, which
borrowed $19 million to purchase a majority limited partner interest in SSC
Benelux & Co., SCS (Benelux SCS), thus reducing our equity position in Benelux
SCS from 85.6% to 12.5%. This transaction resulted in the return of $9.3 million
for loans we had made to Benelux SCS. We, together with one of our partners,
have the right to increase our participation in the joint venture through an
equity contribution. In July 1998, we increased our participation in the joint
venture by purchasing an additional interest from a joint venture partner for
$300,000, thus, increasing our equity position in Benelux SCS to 13.06%. We
invested $2.2 million and $6.9 million in Benelux SCS in the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. As of December 31, 1998, we were
operating in Belgium, Sweden, France and the United Kingdom.
Ground leases related to two European storage centers are included
in land at the discounted value of required cash payments of $1.4 million and
the corresponding liabilities of $1.4 million have been recorded in other
liabilities. The lease terms are 24 and 97 years with bargain purchase options
at 26 and 15 years, respectively. These leases require annual payments of
approximately $161,000 in each of the next five years.
NOTE G - LINES OF CREDIT
We have an unsecured domestic line of credit to borrow up to $150
million at a spread over LIBOR, maturing September 30, 1999, with the option to
extend until September 2000. The amount available and the spread vary based on
the terms of the agreement; as of December 31, 1998, the current available
amount is $150 million, of which approximately $81.5 million is outstanding. At
December 31, 1998, the weighted average interest rate was 7.19%.
We have four unsecured and three secured European credit lines
(denominated in local currencies) to borrow up to a total of $14.7 million of
which $13.5 million had been drawn as of December 31, 1998. Of this amount, $0.6
million matures March 1999, $10.6 million matures June 2001, $0.9 million
matures December 2002 and the remaining matures December 2005. The weighted
average effective interest rate on these lines at December 31, 1998 was 5.7%.
The stated interest rates on $7.1 million and $0.9 million are fixed by swap
agreements at 6.07% and 7.86%, respectively. Interest on $2.1 million floats at
125 basis points above the Paris Interbank Offer Rate, while interest on the
remaining $3.4 million floats at 100 basis points above the Belgian Interbank
Offer Rate.
-61-
<PAGE> 62
NOTE H - NOTES PAYABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
1998 1997
-------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Note payable to financial services company $122,580 $122,580
Senior notes payable 100,000 100,000
Mortgage notes payable 51,536 8,703
Notes payable to affiliated joint venture 56,882 7,479
Other notes payable 111 732
-------- --------
$331,109 $239,494
======== ========
</TABLE>
The $122.6 million non-recourse note payable to a financial services
company requires monthly payments of interest only at 8.28% until it matures
June 2001 and is secured by 86 properties with a book value of $226 million. As
required by the loan agreement, we deposit cash in restricted accounts to fund
certain expenses including real estate taxes and insurance. During 1995, we sold
two properties securing this note and, as part of the defeasance, were required
to place US treasury notes costing $3.1 million into a trust account. These
treasury notes mature in June 2001 and carry an effective interest rate of 5.1%.
In April 1997, we issued $100 million in senior unsecured notes, $50
million of which are seven year notes due April 2004 bearing interest at 7.5%
and $50 million of which are ten year notes due April 2007 bearing interest at
7.625%. The notes require semi-annual interest due April 25th and October 25th.
There are three mortgage notes payable. Shurgard/Fremont Partners I
(SFPI), a partnership, formed on April 28, 1998 in which we own a 10% interest,
has a non-recourse credit facility from a commercial bank of up to $47.9 million
of which $42.8 million was outstanding as of December 31, 1998. The note matures
May 2001, is secured by the 15 properties owned by SFP1, and requires monthly
payments of interest only at 200 basis points above LIBOR. As of December 31,
1998, the interest rate was 7.25%. We have swap agreements in effect for each
borrowing which have a weighted average interest rate of 7.57% as of December
31, 1998.
-62-
<PAGE> 63
The remaining two mortgage notes are secured by a deed of trust on
two storage centers. The first is a recourse mortgage due in monthly
installments of $13,441, including principal and interest at 10.25%, and matures
April 2001. The second is a non-recourse participating mortgage for $7.3 million
requiring fixed monthly payments of interest only at 8% plus quarterly payments
of 90% of excess cash flow, as defined in the agreement. This mortgage also
requires payment of 90% of the storage center's appreciation upon maturity,
December 2003. Other notes payable consist of local improvement district
warrants and a note taken in connection with a real estate acquisition.
As of December 31, 1998, Benelux SCS had borrowed a total of $56.9
million with a weighted average interest rate of 7.44%. The notes are from an
affiliated joint venture in which we own a 9.15% interest and mature December
31, 2000.
The maturities of principal on both domestic and foreign debt over
the next five fiscal years are approximately $120,000 in 1999; $56.9 million in
2000; $166.7 million in 2001; $29,000 in 2002 and $7.3 million in 2003.
NOTE I - SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
In addition to the rights, privileges and powers of Class A Common
Stock, Class B common stockholders received loans from SSCI to fund certain
obligations to the 17 partnerships which comprise our predecessor. The loans are
due between 2000 and 2003 and are secured by the Class B Common Stock.
Class B Common Stock is convertible to Class A Common Stock at a one-to-one
ratio as the loans are repaid.
SSCI has 40 million shares of preferred stock authorized, of which
2.8 million shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock, (none are issued and outstanding at December 31, 1998); 2.3
million shares have been designated as Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock (2 million of which are issued and outstanding at December 31, 1998, as
discussed below) and 2 million shares have been designated as Series C
Cumulative Redeemable preferred stock (2 million of which are issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1998, as discussed below). The Board of Directors is
authorized to determine the rights, preferences and privileges of the preferred
stock including the number of shares constituting any such series, and the
designation thereof.
In January and February 1997, we raised net proceeds after offering
costs of $59.3 million through the sale of 2.2 million shares of Class A Common
Stock. In April 1997, we raised $50 million ($48.2 million in net proceeds)
through the sale of 2 million shares of Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock. These preferred shares require quarterly distribution payments totaling
8.8% per year and are callable at our option after five years, at a redemption
price of $25 per share. In September 1997, we raised net proceeds after offering
costs of $18.9 million through the sale of 727,080 shares of Class A Common
Stock. On
-63-
<PAGE> 64
December 3, 1998, we raised net proceeds after offering costs of $48.1 million
through the sale of 2 million shares of Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock. These preferred shares require quarterly distribution payments totaling
8.7% per year and are callable at our option after five years, at a redemption
price of $25 per share.
Under the Management Company Merger Agreement, we were contingently
obligated to issue additional shares as consideration for certain partnership
interests held by the Management Company which were not valued at the time of
the merger. Subsequent to year end, we issued 145,286 shares related to this
obligation. Additional shares may be issued over the next two years as
consideration for similar interests in two other partnerships.
-64-
<PAGE> 65
NOTE J - STOCK COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PLANS
The 1993 Stock Option Plan (the 1993 Plan) provides for the granting
of options for up to 3% of our outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock at the
end of each year, limited in the aggregate to 5,000,000 shares. In general, the
options vest ratably over five years and must be exercised within ten years from
date of grant. The exercise price for qualified incentive options under the 1993
Plan must be at least equal to fair market value at date of grant and at least
85% of fair market value at date of grant for non qualified options. The 1993
Plan expires in 2003.
The 1995 Long -Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the 1995 Plan)
provides for the granting of options for up to 2% of the adjusted average shares
of our Class A Common Stock outstanding during the preceding calendar year, as
well as stock appreciation rights, stock awards (including restricted stock),
performance awards, other stock-based awards and distribution equivalent rights.
The 1995 Plan requires mandatory acceleration in the event of certain mergers
and consolidations or a sale of substantially all the assets or a liquidation of
SSCI, except where such awards are assumed or replaced in the transaction. The
1995 Plan permits the plan administrator to authorize loans, loan guarantees or
installment payments to assist award recipients in acquiring shares pursuant to
awards and contains certain limitations imposed by recent tax legislation. The
1995 Plan allows for grants to consultants and agents, as well as our officers
and key employees.
In 1993, we also established the Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee
Directors (the Directors Plan) for the purpose of attracting and retaining the
services of experienced and knowledgeable outside directors. This plan was
amended during 1995 and provided current outside directors with 6,000 shares
each in 1995 and 3,000 shares each annually thereafter. Such options vest upon
continued service until our next annual meeting. In 1998 the Director's Plan was
amended and restated to provide for discretionary grants. The total number of
shares reserved under the Plan did not change and remains at 200,000. The
exercise price for options granted under the Directors Plan is equal to fair
market value at date of grant. As of December 31, 1998, 34,000 of these options
were outstanding.
We have an employee incentive savings and stock ownership plan, in
which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Each year,
employees may contribute an amount up to 15% of their annual compensation not to
exceed the maximum allowable by law. We match a portion of employee
contributions and may make annual discretionary contributions to purchase
company stock. Our expense for contributions to this plan was approximately,
$921,000, $550,000, and $463,000 for 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. We do
not offer post-employment or post-retirement benefits.
In 1996, we established an Employee Stock Purchase Plan under which
employees can elect to purchase SSCI stock through regular periodic payroll
deductions without paying broker commissions. This plan provides for potential
price discounts of up to 15%; however, no discount is currently being offered to
employees.
-65-
<PAGE> 66
The weighted average remaining contractual life of options
outstanding at December 31, 1998 was 8.2 years and option prices ranged from
$18.90 to $29.00 per share. The following table summarizes the outstanding and
exercisable options under all of our plans:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
NO. OF EXERCISE
SHARES PRICE
------ --------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding, January 1, 1996 192,200 $22.15
Granted 80,597 26.26
Forfeited (14,206) 24.99
Exercised (7,500) 22.00
-------
Outstanding, December 31, 1996 251,091 23.32
Granted 254,045 28.25
Forfeited (14,245) 26.67
Exercised (10,959) 23.58
-------
Outstanding, December 31, 1997 479,932 25.82
-------
Granted 417,500 28.98
Forfeited (53,227) 23.53
Exercised (18,639) 27.50
-------
Outstanding, December 31, 1998 825,566 27.36
=======
Exercisable, December 31, 1996 51,000 22.45
=======
Exercisable, December 31, 1997 97,177 23.11
=======
Exercisable, December 31, 1998 231,278 27.10
=======
</TABLE>
During 1996, performance awards for 12,994 shares were granted of
which 670 and 930 were cancelled during 1998 and 1997, respectively. These
shares are contingent on meeting certain performance objectives over the three
year period ending December 31, 1998. As of December 31, 1998, 8,696 shares were
to be issued related to the awards.
We have adopted the disclosure only provisions of the Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." No compensation cost has been recognized for the stock option
plans. Had compensation cost for options granted under our two stock option
plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in
1996, 1997 and 1998 consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, our net
income and net income per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below (in thousands):
-66-
<PAGE> 67
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income:
As reported $ 44,734 $ 42,311 $ 32,785
Pro forma 38,829 41,698 32,212
Dilutive net income per share:
As reported 1.39 1.40 1.39
Pro forma 1.35 1.38 1.37
Weighted average fair value of options granted
2.90 2.55 8.78
</TABLE>
The fair value of options granted under our stock option plans
during 1998, 1997 and 1996 was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used: dividend yield of 6.76%, 6.8% and 3.60%, expected volatility
of 21%, 17.61% and 21.61%, risk free interest rate of 4.64%, 5.77% and 5.99%,
and expected life of 6.5, 10, and 10 years, respectively.
In January 1999, we granted 628,350 options at $25.25 per share
which represented the market price at the time of grant, of which 16,000 vest
within six months. The remaining options vest ratably over three years.
NOTE K - SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
In March 1994, we adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and declared a
distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of common stock. Under
certain conditions, each Right may be exercised to purchase one one-hundredth of
a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at purchase price of
$65, subject to adjustment. The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or
group has acquired 10% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, or
following the commencement of a tender or exchange offer for 10% or more of such
outstanding shares of common stock. If a person or group acquires more than 10%
of the then outstanding shares of common stock, each Right will entitle its
holder to receive, upon exercise, common Stock (or, in certain circumstances,
cash, property or other securities of SSCI) having a value equal to two times
the exercise price of the Right. In addition, if SSCI is acquired in a merger or
other business combination transaction, each Right will entitle its holder to
purchase that number of the acquiring company's common shares having a market
value of twice the Right's exercise price. We will be entitled to redeem the
Rights at $.0001 per Right at any time prior to the earlier of the expiration of
the Rights in March 2004 or the time that a person has acquired a 10% position.
The Rights do not have voting or distribution rights, and until they become
exercisable, have no dilutive effect on our earnings.
-67-
<PAGE> 68
NOTE L - NET INCOME PER SHARE
The following summarizes the computation of basic and diluted net
income per share:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NET INCOME
NET INCOME SHARES PER SHARE
---------- -------- -----------
(in thousands except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996
Basic net income $ 32,785 23,517 $ 1.39
Effect of dilutive stock options 53
-------- ------ -----------
Diluted net income $ 32,785 23,570 $ 1.39
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997
Net Income $ 42,311
Less: Preferred dividends (3,060)
Basic net income 39,251 27,947 $ 1.40
Effect of dilutive stock options 53
-------- ------ -----------
Diluted net income $ 39,251 28,000 $ 1.40
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998
Net Income 44,734
Less: Preferred dividends (4,690)
Basic net income 40,044 28,693 $ 1.40
Effect of dilutive stock options 31
-------- ------ -----------
Diluted net income $ 40,044 28,724 $ 1.39
</TABLE>
-68-
<PAGE> 69
NOTE M - SEGMENT REPORTING
SSCI has three reportable segments; Same, New and European Stores.
Our definition of Same Stores includes existing domestic facilities acquired as
of January 1 of the previous year as well as developed properties that have been
operating a full eight quarters as of the beginning of the current quarter. We
include these newly developed storage centers in our same store comparison
beginning the quarter following their second anniversary of opening. We project
that newly developed properties will reach stabilization in an average of 21 to
24 months. New Stores include existing domestic facilities that had not been
acquired as of January 1 the previous year as well as domestic developed
properties that had not been operating a full 24 months. Our definition of
European Stores includes all non-domestic stores. We are currently located in
four European countries: Belgium, France, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
The three reportable segments allow us to focus on increasing net
operating income from our existing domestic real estate assets, renting up our
new domestic facilities, and becoming a dominant player in the European market.
We evaluate each segment's performance based on net operating income (NOI) which
is defined as rental revenue less direct operating expenses and real estate
taxes. NOI does not include any allocation of off-site management or overhead
costs.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies. There are no
inter-segment sales and transfers.
SSCI does not allocate non-direct operating expenses, depreciation &
amortization, general, administrative and other, interest expense, interest and
other income (net) and minority interest to the segments.
Using the definition of Same Store and New Store described above,
the portfolio of assets reported in these segments changes from year to year.
Assets transition from New Store to Same Store over time. The following table
illustrates the results using the 1998 Same Store, New Store and European store
base for reportable segments as of and for the years ended December 31, 1998 and
1997:
-69-
<PAGE> 70
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EUROPEAN
SAME STORES NEW STORES STORES TOTAL
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
Rental revenue $ 146,138 $ 21,579 $ 4,243 $ 171,960
Operating expenses (41,025) (9,167) (2,545) (52,737)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NOI $ 105,113 $ 12,412 $ 1,698 $ 119,223
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total assets $ 673,164 $ 275,467 $ 90,664 $ 1,039,295
=========== =========== =========== ===========
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Rental revenue $ 139,564 $ 7,193 $ 1,927 $ 148,684
Operating expenses (41,329) (3,430) (1,656) (46,415)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NOI $ 98,235 $ 3,763 $ 271 $ 102,269
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Total assets $ 682,559 $ 146,253 $ 40,080 $ 868,892
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
The following table illustrates the results using the 1997 Same Store,
New Store and European store base for reportable segments as of and for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EUROPEAN
SAME STORES NEW STORES STORES TOTAL
----------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Rental revenue $ 112,068 $ 34,689 $ 1,927 $ 148,684
Operating expenses (32,832) (11,927) (1,656) (46,415)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
NOI $ 79,236 $ 22,762 $ 271 $ 102,269
========= ========= ========= =========
Total assets $ 511,586 $ 317,226 $ 40,080 $ 868,892
========= ========= ========= =========
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Rental revenue $ 106,463 $ 6,828 $ 388 $ 113,679
Operating expenses (32,593) (3,123) (748) (36,464)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
NOI $ 73,870 $ 3,705 $ (360) $ 77,215
========= ========= ========= =========
Total assets $ 575,860 $ 190,358 $ 19,758 $ 785,976
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
-70-
<PAGE> 71
The following table reconciles the reportable segments' revenues to
consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Segment rental revenue $ 171,960 $ 148,684 $ 113,679
Revenue from unconsolidated joint ventures (12,971) (10,938) (9,895)
--------- --------- ---------
Consolidated rental revenue 158,989 137,746 103,784
--------- --------- ---------
Other real estate investments income (loss) (1,628) 225 3,371
Property management revenue 1,893 2,463 3,244
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenue $ 159,254 $ 140,434 $ 110,399
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The following table reconciles the reportable segments' NOI to
consolidated net income for the years ending December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total Segment NOI $ 119,223 $ 102,269 $ 77,215
Net income from unconsolidated joint ventures (8,616) (8,230) (7,319)
Other real estate investments income (loss) (1,628) 225 3,371
Property management revenue 1,893 2,463 3,244
Other operating expenses (49,456) (40,065) (31,449)
Interest & other income (19,645) (15,615) (12,225)
Minority interest 2,963 1,264 (52)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 44,734 $ 42,311 $ 32,785
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The following table reconciles the reportable segments' assets to
consolidated assets as of December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Segment assets $ 1,039,295 $ 868,892 $ 785,976
Unconsolidated joint ventures (51,605) (59,259) (43,105)
Corporate assets 166,217 145,855 61,612
----------- ----------- -----------
Consolidated assets $ 1,153,907 $ 955,488 $ 804,483
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
-71-
<PAGE> 72
NOTE N - SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
----------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31,
1998 1998 1998 1998
-------- -------- --------- -------
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue $37,115 $38,387 $41,549 $42,169
Income from operations 14,143 15,758 16,750 14,731
Net income 10,369 11,339 11,794 11,232
Net income per common share
Basic 0.32 0.36 0.37 0.34
Diluted 0.32 0.36 0.37 0.34
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
----------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30, DEC. 31,
1997 1997 1997 1997
--------- -------- --------- --------
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue $31,735 $33,699 $37,085 $37,915
Income from operations 12,555 14,327 15,607 14,173
Net income 9,198 10,859 11,822 10,432
Net income per common share
Basic 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.33
Diluted 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.33
</TABLE>
NOTE O - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
As a general partner, we are contingently liable for $23.1 million
of a joint venture's debt.
Under the terms of the SFPI agreement executed in connection with
the formation of SFPI, we were granted an option to acquire all fifteen of the
properties owned by SFPI. The purchase option is exercisable at certain times
between December 15, 2000 and December 31, 2002, depending upon the performance
of the properties. The purchase price for the properties upon exercise of the
option is based on a 9 1/4 capitalization rate applied to the net operating
income of the properties for the three or four-month period preceding the
exercise of the option. If the properties meet certain performance criteria, we
are committed to make an option payment of $7.5 million. If we choose to
exercise the option, the option payment will be applied toward the purchase
price of the properties.
-72-
<PAGE> 73
NOTE P - LITIGATION
On April 6, 1998, a lawsuit was filed in the state of California against
Shurgard Storage Centers Inc., alleging that our late fees and lien fees
constitute an unfair business practice. It is too early to predict the impact,
if any, this suit will have on our operating results. The Company intends to
vigorously defend against the plaintiff's claims.
-73-
<PAGE> 74
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.
Seattle, Washington
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Shurgard Storage
Centers, Inc., and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements of the Company present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998 in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 26, 1999
-74-
<PAGE> 75
ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10 - DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information regarding the Registrant's executive officers called for
by Part III Item 10 is set forth in Item I of Part I herein under the caption
"Executive Officers of the Registrant." Information regarding directors of the
Company and Section 16 reporting is set forth in our proxy statement for the
annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 11, 1999, and is incorporated
herein by reference. On November 17, 1998, director Howard Johnson resigned.
ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information regarding executive compensation is set forth in our
proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 11, 1999,
and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management is set forth in our proxy statement for the annual meeting
of shareholders to be held May 11, 1999, and is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions
is set forth in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be
held May 11, 1999, and is incorporated herein by reference.
-75-
<PAGE> 76
PART IV
ITEM 14 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE NO.
--------
<S> <C>
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1998 and 1997 50
For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
Consolidated Statements of Net Income 51
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity 52
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 54-73
Independent Auditors' Report 74
</TABLE>
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules have been omitted because either
they are not applicable or the required information is shown
in the financial statements.
3. Exhibits
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
3.2 Designation of Rights and Preferences of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Exhibit 3.2) (2)
3.3 Designation of Rights and Preferences of 8.8% Series B
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Exhibit 3.3) (2)
3.4 Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (Exhibit 3.4) (2)
3.5 Designation of Rights and Preferences of 8.7% Series C
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Exhibit 3) (3)
4.1 Rights Agreement between the Registrant and Gemisys
Corporation dated as of March 17, 1994 (Exhibit 2.1)
(4)
4.2 First Amendment to Rights Agreement between the
Registrant and Gemisys Corporation dated May 13, 1997
(Exhibit 4.2)(5)
4.3 Indenture between the Registrant and LaSalle National
Bank, as Trustee, dated April 25, 1997, (Exhibit
10.4)(6)
4.4 Supplemental Indenture dated July 11, 1997
4.5 Form of 7 1/2% Notes due 2001 (Exhibit 4.1)(7)
4.6 Form of 7 5/8% Notes due 2007 (Exhibit 4.2)(7)
10.1 Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Nomura
Asset Capital Corp., as Lender, and SSC Property
Holdings, Inc., as Borrower, dated as of June 8, 1994
(Exhibit 10.4) (8)
</TABLE>
-76-
<PAGE> 77
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.2 Amended and Restated Collection Account and Servicing
Agreement among SSC Property Holdings, Inc., Pacific
Mutual Life Insurance Company, LaSalle National Bank
and Nomura Asset Capital Corp. dated as of June 8,
1994 (Exhibit 10.5) (8)
10.3 Amended and Restated Loan Agreement among Shurgard
Storage Centers, Inc., Seattle-First National Bank,
KeyBank of Washington, U.S. Bank of Washington and
LaSalle National Bank dated September 9, 1996 (Exhibit
99.40) (9)
10.4 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of November 14, 1996 (Exhibit 10.8) (5)
10.5 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement dated as of March 12, 1997 (Exhibit 10.10)
(10)
10.6 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of July 27, 1997 (Exhibit 10.6) (11)
10.7 Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement dated as of January 30, 1998 (Exhibit 10.7)
(11)
10.8 Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of May 1, 1998
10.9 Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of October 27, 1998 (Exhibit 10.1) (13)
10.10 Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Registrant
and Shurgard Incorporated dated as of December 19,
1994 (Exhibit 10.7) (14)
*10.11 Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan (Exhibit
10.7)(11)
*10.12 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan for
Nonemployee Directors (Exhibit 10.7)(15)
*10.13 1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (16)
*10.14 Form of Business Combination Agreement, together with
schedule of actual agreements
10.15 Partnership Agreement, dated April 28, 1998, between
Shurgard Development I, Inc. and Fremont Storage I,
L.P. forming Shurgard/Fremont Partners I (Exhibit 1.1)
(17)
12.1 Statement Re: computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
-77-
<PAGE> 78
- -----------------
(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B contained in the
Definitive Additional Proxy Materials on Form DEF14A filed on
April 29, 1997.
(2) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 14, 1997.
(3) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on December
4, 1998.
(4) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on March
17, 1994.
(5) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Form 8-B Registration on July 16, 1997.
(6) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.
(7) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Reports on Form 8-K dated April 22, 1997.
(8) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4, Amendment No. 1,
filed on January 25, 1995.
(9) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Schedule 13E-3/A Amendment No. 11 filed on October
12, 1996.
(10) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended
December 31, 1996.
(11) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended
December 31, 1997.
(12) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998.
(13) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 3, 1998.
(14) Incorporated by reference to Appendix I filed as part of the
Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated February
15, 1995.
(15) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-k filed on March 31, 1995.
(16) Incorporated by reference to Appendix B filed as part of the
Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement dated June 8, 1995.
(17) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Reports on Form 8-K dated May 29, 1998
- - Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
-78-
<PAGE> 79
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On December 4, 1998, we filed Form 8-K dated December 3, 1998 which
disclosed the Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated
October 27, 1998.
On December 21, 1998, we filed Form 8-K dated December 17, 1998, which
disclosed the amendment of the Company's Bylaws.
-79-
<PAGE> 80
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual
Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Seattle, State of Washington, on the 9th day of
March, 1999.
SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.
By: /s/ Harrell Beck
-----------------------------
Harrell Beck
Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following
persons in the capacities indicated below on the 9th day of March, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title
- --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
/s/ Charles K. Barbo Chairman of the Board, President and
- --------------------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer
Charles K. Barbo (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Harrell Beck Senior Vice President, Treasurer,
- --------------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer and Director
Harrell Beck (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ George Hutchinson Director
- ---------------------------------------------
George Hutchinson
/s/ Raymond Johnson
- --------------------------------------------- Director
Raymond Johnson
/s/ W. J. Smith
- --------------------------------------------- Director
W. J. Smith
</TABLE>
-80-
<PAGE> 81
EXHIBIT INDEX
3. Exhibits
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
3.2 Designation of Rights and Preferences of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Exhibit 3.2) (2)
3.3 Designation of Rights and Preferences of 8.8% Series B
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Exhibit 3.3)
(2)
3.4 Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (Exhibit 3.4) (2)
3.5 Designation of Rights and Preferences of 8.7% Series C
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Exhibit 3) (3)
4.1 Rights Agreement between the Registrant and Gemisys
Corporation dated as of March 17, 1994 (Exhibit 2.1)
(4)
4.2 First Amendment to Rights Agreement between the
Registrant and Gemisys Corporation dated May 13, 1997
(Exhibit 4.2)(5)
4.3 Indenture between the Registrant and LaSalle National
Bank, as Trustee, dated April 25, 1997, (Exhibit
10.4)(6)
4.4 Supplemental Indenture dated July 11, 1997
4.5 Form of 7 1/2% Notes due 2001 (Exhibit 4.1)(7)
4.6 Form of 7 5/8% Notes due 2007 (Exhibit 4.2)(7)
10.1 Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Nomura
Asset Capital Corp., as Lender, and SSC Property
Holdings, Inc., as Borrower, dated as of June 8, 1994
(Exhibit 10.4) (8)
</TABLE>
-81-
<PAGE> 82
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.2 Amended and Restated Collection Account and Servicing
Agreement among SSC Property Holdings, Inc., Pacific
Mutual Life Insurance Company, LaSalle National Bank
and Nomura Asset Capital Corp. dated as of June 8,
1994 (Exhibit 10.5) (8)
10.3 Amended and Restated Loan Agreement among Shurgard
Storage Centers, Inc., Seattle-First National Bank,
KeyBank of Washington, U.S. Bank of Washington and
LaSalle National Bank dated September 9, 1996 (Exhibit
99.40) (9)
10.4 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of November 14, 1996 (Exhibit 10.8) (5)
10.5 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement dated as of March 12, 1997 (Exhibit 10.10)
(10)
10.6 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of July 27, 1997 (Exhibit 10.6) (11)
10.7 Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement dated as of January 30, 1998 (Exhibit 10.7)
(11)
10.8 Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of May 1, 1998
10.9 Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
dated as of October 27, 1998 (Exhibit 10.1) (13)
10.10 Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Registrant
and Shurgard Incorporated dated as of December 19,
1994 (Exhibit 10.7) (14)
*10.11 Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan (Exhibit
10.7)(11)
*10.12 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan for
Nonemployee Directors (Exhibit 10.7)(15)
*10.13 1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (16)
*10.14 Form of Business Combination Agreement, together with
schedule of actual agreements
10.15 Partnership Agreement, dated April 28, 1998, between
Shurgard Development I, Inc. and Fremont Storage I,
L.P. forming Shurgard/Fremont Partners I (Exhibit 1.1)
(17)
12.1 Statement Re: computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
-82-
<PAGE> 83
- -----------------
(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B contained in the
Definitive Additional Proxy Materials on Form DEF14A filed on
April 29, 1997.
(2) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 14, 1997.
(3) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on December
4, 1998.
(4) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on March
17, 1994.
(5) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Form 8-B Registration on July 16, 1997.
(6) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.
(7) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Reports on Form 8-K dated April 22, 1997.
(8) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4, Amendment No. 1,
filed on January 25, 1995.
(9) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Schedule 13E-3/A Amendment No. 11 filed on October
12, 1996.
(10) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended
December 31, 1996.
(11) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended
December 31, 1997.
(12) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998.
(13) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 3, 1998.
(14) Incorporated by reference to Appendix I filed as part of the
Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated February
15, 1995.
(15) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-k filed on March 31, 1995.
(16) Incorporated by reference to Appendix B filed as part of the
Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement dated June 8, 1995.
(17) Incorporated by reference to designated exhibit filed with the
Registrant's Current Reports on Form 8-K dated May 29, 1998
- - Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
-83-
<PAGE> 1
SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.
EXHIBIT (12.1)- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Company
-------------------------------------------------------
Year-ended-December-31,
-------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income before extraordinary item $44,734 $42,311 $32,785 $29,572 $19,001
Fixed charges:
Interest 21,076 17,096 12,829 12,038 9,105
Preferred dividends 4,690 3,060
Amortization of loan costs 1,120 1,105 1,120 1,120 629
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
26,886 21,261 13,949 13,158 9,734
Net income before extraordinary
item and fixed charges
71,620 63,572 46,734 42,730 28,735
Divided by fixed charges(1) 34,463 24,493 16,734 14,265 9,734
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 2.08 2.60 2.79 3.00 2.95
</TABLE>
(1) Fixed charges includes capitalized interest that was not deducted when
arriving at net income.
<PAGE> 1
Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.
Exhibit (21.1) - Subsidiaries of the Registrant
(i) SSC Property Holdings, Inc.;
(ii) SSC Benelux Inc.; and
(iii) SSC Evergreen Inc.
(iv) Shurgard Development I, Inc.
<PAGE> 1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-
21273 of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated February
26, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shurgard Storage
Centers, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle,Washington
March 10, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1998
<CASH> 9,474
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 0
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 0
<PP&E> 1,150,982
<DEPRECIATION> 106,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,153,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 0
<BONDS> 331,109
0
96,171
<COMMON> 604,398
<OTHER-SE> (48,759)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,153,907
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 159,254
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 93,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 21,076
<INCOME-PRETAX> 44,734
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 44,734
<EPS-PRIMARY> 1.40
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.39
</TABLE>
