CORRPRO COMPANIES INC /OH/, PRE 14A, 1998-05-29

CORRPRO COMPANIES INC /OH/
PRE 14A, 1998-05-29
ENGINEERING SERVICES

Previous: GOVERNMENT SECURITIES EQUITY TRUST SERIES 9, 485BPOS, 1998-05-29

Next: TCW DW TERM TRUST 2000, NSAR-A, 1998-05-29

<PAGE> 1

================================================================================

SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION
ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec.240.14a-11(c) or sec.240.14a-12
</TABLE>

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: .......

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ..........

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): ............

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ......................

(5) Total fee paid: .......................................................

[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) Amount Previously Paid: ...............................................

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: .........................

(3) Filing Party: .........................................................

(4) Date Filed: ...........................................................

================================================================================
<PAGE> 2

[Corrpro logo]

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be held on
JULY 22, 1998

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") of Corrpro
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at Medina Country Club, 5588
Wedgewood Road, Medina, Ohio at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight time on Wednesday,
July 22, 1998, to consider and act on the following matters. The purposes of the
meeting are:

1. The election of three directors of the Company for terms expiring
in 2000.

2. The approval of an amendment to the Company's Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized common shares
of the Company from 12,000,000 to 40,000,000.

3. The approval of an amendment to the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
of Corrpro Companies, Inc. to increase the number of Common Shares
reserved for issuance thereunder from 1,285,738 to 1,585,738.

4. The approval of an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations
to permit shareholders to set the size of the Board of Directors.

5. The approval of an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations
to limit the removal of directors to "for cause" grounds.

6. The approval of an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations
to establish certain procedures for the proposal and conduct of
business at shareholders' meetings.

7. The approval of an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations
amending the provisions for amending the Code of Regulations.

8. Such other business, incident to the conduct of the meeting, that
may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on May 22, 1998
as the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Neal R. Restivo
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer

June 15, 1998

<PAGE> 3

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

The accompanying Proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of
Corrpro Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for use at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held at 10:00 a.m. at the Medina Country Club on Wednesday,
July 22, 1998, and at any adjournments of that meeting.

If you attend the meeting, you may vote your shares by ballot. If you
do not attend, your shares may still be voted at the meeting if you sign and
return the enclosed Proxy. Common Shares represented by a properly signed card
will be voted in accordance with the instructions marked on the Proxy. If no
instructions are marked, the shares will be voted to elect the nominees listed
below and in favor of the proposed actions to amend the Company's Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation, Amended and Restated Code of Regulations,
and 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Corrpro Companies, Inc. You may revoke your
proxy before it is voted by giving notice to the Secretary of the Company in
writing or orally at the meeting.

This Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxy are being mailed to
shareholders on or about June 15, 1998.

I.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company Board of Directors is divided into two classes, each of
whose members serve for a two-year term. Shareholder approval is sought to
re-elect Warren F. Rogers, Barry W. Schadeck, and Walter W. Williams to the
class of Directors whose term expires in 2000. If any Director nominee becomes
unable to accept nomination or election, the persons voting the shares
represented by the Proxies will vote the shares in accordance with their best
judgment. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will
be unable to serve.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2000

WARREN F. ROGERS, 68, has served as a Director of the Company since July 1996.
Dr. Rogers is president of Warren Rogers Associates, Inc., a Newport, Rhode
Island firm which provides underground storage tank management and consulting
services, including mathematical and statistical modeling. He has held this
position since 1979. In addition, Dr. Rogers served as a Vice President of the
Center for Naval Analysis in Alexandria, Virginia from 1982 to 1989. Dr. Rogers
earned a Ph.D. in statistics from Stanford University and has an M.S. in
Operations Research from the U.S. Naval Post-Graduate School.

BARRY W. SCHADECK, 47, has served as a Director of the Company since April 1993
and as Executive Vice President since July 1995. Mr. Schadeck has served as
President of Corrpro Canada, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company,
since its formation in May 1994. Mr. Schadeck has served as President of the
Company's Commonwealth Seager Group subsidiary ("CSG") since April 1993 and
Chief Financial Officer of CSG since 1979. Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Schadeck
served as Chief Financial Accountant of Associated Engineering Services Ltd. for
seven years. Mr. Schadeck is a graduate of Northern Alberta Institute of
Technology with a degree in accounting, and received his designation as a
Certified General Accountant in 1978.

WALTER W. WILLIAMS, 64, has served as a Director of the Company since July 1996.
Mr. Williams retired in November 1992 from his position as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Rubbermaid Incorporated, a position he had held since May
1991. Prior to that time, Mr. Williams served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of Rubbermaid Incorporated commencing in September 1987 and Vice
Chairman commencing in October 1990. Prior to joining Rubbermaid, Mr. Williams
spent 31 years with The General Electric Company in a wide variety of domestic
and international consumer marketing, sales and general management positions.
Mr. Williams

2
<PAGE> 4

serves on the Board of Directors for The Stanley Works and PAXAR Corporation.
Mr. Williams is a graduate of Utica College of Syracuse University with a degree
in Finance.

Provided a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a plurality of
the Common Shares, without par value of the Company (the "Common Shares")
represented and voting, in person or by proxy, at any meeting of shareholders is
required under Ohio law to elect Directors.

Votes may be cast in favor of, or withheld from, each nominee in the
election of directors. Votes that are withheld will not be included in the
number of votes cast although such shares will be counted as present for
purposes of determining the existence of a quorum. The New York Stock Exchange
rules permit brokers who hold shares in street name to vote on certain items
when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. Brokers who do
not receive instructions are entitled to vote on the election of Directors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES
FOR DIRECTOR.

PRESENT DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 1999

JOSEPH W. ROG, 58, has served as a Director of the Company since 1984, as
Chairman of the Board of Directors since June 1993, and as President of the
Company since June 1995 and from January 1984 until June 1993. Mr. Rog has
served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its formation in 1984.
Mr. Rog has over thirty years of industry experience in various technical and
management capacities and has broad, first-hand experience in corrosion analysis
and the design and implementation of corrosion control systems. Mr. Rog is a
graduate of Kent State University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology,
and has also completed the Graduate School of Business course at Stanford
University.

DAVID H. KROON, 48, has served as a Director of the Company since 1984, and as
an Executive Vice President since April 1993. Mr. Kroon served as Senior Vice
President of the Company from its formation in 1984 until April 1993. Mr. Kroon
has over twenty-five years of engineering and consulting experience in the
corrosion control market. Mr. Kroon is widely published in water and waste
treatment, electrical power, oil and gas, and environmental journals worldwide.
Mr. Kroon has management experience in the areas of business planning, policies
and procedures, and professional development. Mr. Kroon is a graduate of Yale
University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry.

C. RICHARD LYNHAM, 56, has served as a Director of the Company since June 1992.
Mr. Lynham is presently the owner and Chief Executive Officer of Harbor
Castings, Inc., an investment casting foundry located in North Canton, Ohio.
Prior to assuming this position in 1992, Mr. Lynham served as Group Vice
President, Ceramics, for Ferro Corporation (1984-1992), a Fortune 500
manufacturer of industrial specialty products. Mr. Lynham is a graduate of
Cornell University with a Bachelor's of Mechanical Engineering degree and has
also received a Master of Business Administration from Harvard University.

ROBERT E. HODGE, 60, has served as a Director of the Company since November
1993. Mr. Hodge retired in January 1993 from his position as Senior Vice
President of Gas Supply, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, a unit of
MidCon Corp., which is a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Mr.
Hodge joined Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America in 1960 and became Senior
Vice President in 1989. A graduate of the University of Missouri, Rolla, with a
degree in electrical engineering, Mr. Hodge also holds a Master of Business
Administration from the University of Illinois.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; ATTENDANCE

The present members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Hodge, Lynham,
Rogers and Williams. The Audit Committee approves annually the firm of
independent auditors that is to be engaged to audit and to report on the
financial statements, reviews and approves the annual audit plan, oversees the
Company's internal control

3
<PAGE> 5

structure, reviews the Company's financial reporting, and reports its activities
to the Board on a regular basis. The Audit Committee had three meetings during
the last fiscal year.

The present members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Hodge,
Lynham, Rogers and Williams. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the
Chief Executive Officer's ("CEO") compensation and, upon consultation with the
CEO, compensation for the officers of the Company and its subsidiaries who
report directly to the CEO; establishes, amends, and determines awards under
executive compensation plans and programs; oversees selection of and meets with
outside consultants to review the Company's executive compensation programs as
appropriate; and reviews board responsibilities, recommends the number of
directors, and nominates directors and committee members. The Compensation
Committee had five meetings during the last fiscal year. The Stock Option
subcommittee, which administers and authorizes awards under certain of the
Company's compensation plans, is comprised of Messrs. Hodge, Lynham and
Williams.

The Board of Directors had eight meetings during the last fiscal year.
During the last fiscal year, each incumbent Director attended at least 75% of
all the meetings of the Board of Directors and of committees on which he served.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Directors not employed by the Company or its subsidiaries are paid a
retainer of $12,000, on an annual basis, and $1,000 ($1,200 for a Committee
Chairperson) for each Board of Directors' or Committee meeting attended in
person and $350 ($550 for a Committee Chairperson) for each Board of Directors'
or Committee meeting attended telephonically.

Pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside
Directors, eligible Directors may elect to defer payment of all or any part of
the compensation received as a Director. Participating Directors elect to have
the return on their deferred funds be based upon various investment options,
including the Company's Common Shares. Deferred portions are payable in a lump
sum, over a period of five years or over a period of ten years. Payments under
the plan commence at a future date previously specified by the Director, or upon
the death or disability of the Director.

Under the 1997 Non-employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of Corrpro
Companies, Inc., automatic grants of options to purchase 2,000 Common Shares at
fair market value are granted annually to each eligible incumbent director.

OWNERSHIP OF COMMON SHARES

The following table shows the number and percent of the Common Shares
beneficially owned on May 22, 1998 by each of the Directors, by the Chief
Executive Officer, by the four other most highly compensated executive officers
in fiscal 1998, by all Directors and executive officers as a group and by each
person or entity who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of the Company's outstanding Common Shares.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF
NAME SHARES (1) (2) PERCENT
---- -------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Michael K. Baach 87,323 1.3%
David M. Hickey 97,601 1.4%
Robert E. Hodge 6,250 *
David H. Kroon 220,244 3.2%
C. Richard Lynham 13,250 *
Neal R. Restivo 43,200 *
Joseph W. Rog 323,856 4.7%
Warren F. Rogers 950 *
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>

4
<PAGE> 6

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry W. Schadeck 108,682 1.6%
Walter W. Williams 50,750 *
13 Directors and executive officers as a group 1,057,448 15.5%
David L. Babson & Company Incorporated (3) 775,600 12.2%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

*Less than 1%

(1) The named shareholders have sole voting and investment power or shared
voting and investment power with their spouse with respect to all shares
shown as being beneficially owned by them, except as otherwise indicated.

(2) Includes, with respect to each of the following individuals and group, the
following number of Common Shares which may be acquired upon the exercise
of options within 60 days following May 22, 1998: Mr. Baach (27,000
shares); Mr. Hickey (74,500 shares); Mr. Hodge (5,250 shares); Mr. Kroon
(27,000 shares); Mr Lynham (11,250 shares); Mr. Restivo (42,000 shares);
Mr. Rog (116,000 shares); Mr. Schadeck (40,000 shares); and all Directors
and executive officers as a group (452,835 shares).

(3) All such shares are subject to sole voting and sole dispositive power. Such
number of shares owned is based upon information provided by a Schedule
13G/A filed by David L. Babson Company Incorporated with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on January 12, 1998.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the
Company's officers, directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of the Company's equity securities to file reports of ownership
and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4, and 5 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. Based solely on the information
provided to the Company by persons required to file such reports, the Company
believes that during fiscal 1998, all Section 16(a) filing requirements
applicable to the Company's officers, directors and ten percent shareholders
were complied with.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth compensation received for the three
years ended March 31, 1998 by the persons who were the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and the four other most highly paid executive officers for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1998 (the "named executive officers").

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
FISCAL OTHER ANNUAL AWARDS STOCK ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION OPTIONS (1) COMPENSATION (2)
--------------------------- ---- ------ ----- ------------ ----------- ----------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Joseph W. Rog 1998 $249,000 $132,600 $ 0 105,000 $ 3,032
Chairman of the Board, 1997 208,125 79,000 0 40,000 1,084
President, and Chief 1996 208,750 0 0 0 1,026
Executive Officer

Michael K. Baach 1998 150,000 63,600 0 25,000 1,096
Executive Vice President 1997 140,000 39,000 0 12,000 385
Sales and Marketing 1996 140,000 35,000 0 0 385

</TABLE>

<PAGE> 7

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
David M. Hickey (3) 1998 170,000 61,800 0 17,500 2,189
Executive Vice President , 1997 165,000 39,000 0 12,000 908
Manufacturing and International 1996 162,000 36,300 50,000 409
Operations 83,516(4)

Neal R. Restivo (5) 1998 164,000 63,600 0 30,000 2,940
Executive Vice President, Chief 1997 152,360 39,000 0 12,000 914
Financial Officer, Secretary 1996 75,008 35,000 0 30,000 152
and Treasurer

Barry W. Schadeck 1998 142,660 82,200 0 25,000 0
Executive Vice President, 1997 139,612 39,000 0 12,000 0
Western Region 1996 102,676 29,000 0 20,000 0
- ------------------------------------ -------- -------------- ----------- --------------- ---------------- --------------------
</TABLE>

(1) On June 30, 1995, Messrs. Rog, and Baach voluntarily forfeited the stock
options granted to each of them during fiscal 1995.

(2) Amounts represent Company matching contributions to the Corrpro Companies,
Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, a qualified salary deferral plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.

(3) Mr. Hickey became an executive officer of the Company during June 1995.
During fiscal 1996, the Company advanced Mr. Hickey $156,000 in connection
with his relocation to the Company's corporate headquarters in Ohio.
Interest on the advance was calculated at a rate of 10% per annum. The
entire advance had been repaid as of the date of this filing.

(4) Includes $73,614 of moving expenses paid by the Company.

(5) Mr. Restivo became an employee of the Company in October 1995. Amounts for
fiscal 1996 related to the six-month period from October 1995 to March
1996.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
VALUE AT ASSUMED
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
% OF TOTAL PRICE APPRECIATION FOR
OPTIONS GRANTED EXERCISE OR OPTION TERM (2)
OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES IN BASE PRICES EXPIRATION ---------------
NAME GRANTED FISCAL YEAR ($/SH) (1) DATE 5% 10%
---- ------- ----------- ---------- ---- --- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Joseph W. Rog 40,000 12.8% $ 9.50 4/1/07 231,994 605,622
20,000 6.4 12.00 8/4/07 146,522 382,498
20,000 6.4 15.00 12/19/07 183,153 478,123
25,000 8.0 14.06 3/24/08 214,594 560,200
Michael K. Baach 10,000 3.2 12.00 8/4/07 73,261 191,249
15,000 4.8 14.06 3/24/08 128,757 336,120
David M. Hickey 10,000 3.2 12.00 8/4/07 73,261 191,249
7,500 2.4 14.06 3/24/08 64,378 168,060
Neal R. Restivo 10,000 3.2 12.00 8/4/07 73,261 191,249
20,000 6.4 14.06 3/24/08 171,675 448,160
</TABLE>

<PAGE> 8

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Barry W. Schadeck 10,000 3.2 12.00 8/4/07 73,261 191,249
15,000 4.8 14.06 3/24/08 128,757 336,120
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(1) The exercise price is based on 100% of the fair market value of the
Company's Common Shares on the date of grant.

(2) Potential Realizable Value is based on certain assumed rates of
appreciation pursuant to rules prescribed by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises are dependent
on the future performance of the Common Shares.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION/SAR VALUES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING OPTIONS IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
SHARES FISCAL YEAR-END AT FISCAL YEAR-END (1)
ACQUIRED ON VALUE --------------- ----------------------
NAME EXERCISE REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- -------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Joseph W. Rog None N/A 116,000 65,000 $915,970 $75,062
Michael K. Baach None N/A 27,000 25,000 248,708 39,412
David M. Hickey None N/A 74,500 17,500 430,595 33,769
Neal R. Restivo None N/A 42,000 30,000 303,645 43,175
Barry W. Schadeck None N/A 40,000 25,000 209,120 39,412
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(1) This value is calculated based on the difference between $14 13/16, the
closing price of the Company's Common Shares on March 31, 1998, and the
exercise price of the options.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

As of April 1, 1998, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement
with Mr. Rog which superseded a previous Employment Agreement which expired on
March 31, 1998. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Rog serves as the Company's
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President. In addition, the
Company has agreed to cause Mr. Rog to be nominated as a Director of the Company
for so long as such agreement remains in effect. This agreement expires on March
31, 2001.

This employment agreement provides for the payment of base salary,
subject to annual adjustments, and such other compensation, whether in the form
of bonuses, stock options, incentive compensation, or otherwise, as determined
by the Board of Directors from time to time. At April 1, 1998, the annual base
salary for Mr. Rog was $274,000.

This employment agreement precludes Mr. Rog from competing with the
Company during the term of the agreement and for as long as Mr. Rog receives
payments pursuant to the agreement. The employment agreement permits the Company
to terminate Mr. Rog's employment for good cause, in which case the Company will
pay Mr. Rog his base salary earned through termination with no further
obligation to him except as required by law.

Mr. Rog has earned the right to receive retirement income with a
lifetime survivor benefit to his spouse in an amount equal to 50% of his base
salary, payable monthly, provided that certain conditions are satisfied.

If Mr. Rog's employment is terminated without good cause three months
prior to or twelve months after a change in control, as defined, or if Mr. Rog
is otherwise terminated without good cause or resigns due to the Company's
failure to honor its obligations under the agreement, the Company must pay Mr.
Rog his salary earned through the termination or resignation date and a
severance payment equal to his base salary for one year (two years in the event
of a change in control) at the rate in effect at the time of termination plus a
payment equal to full year's participation in any short-term incentive bonus
plan at the 100% level. In addition, the Company must maintain any medical or
other insurance coverage in effect at the time of termination until age 65.
Further, all of

<PAGE> 9

Mr. Rog's unvested stock options will become vested immediately and he will
receive any payments due under any long-term incentive plans within ten days of
termination. The amount of the payments as a result of a change in control are
required to be funded within ten days following such change in control, pursuant
to a grantor trust conforming to Internal Revenue Procedure 92-64.

In the event of Mr. Rog's disability, he will continue to receive his
base salary and other compensation and benefits during the first ninety business
days after the date of such disability. If the Board of Directors determines
that reasonable accommodation cannot be made, the Company may terminate Mr.
Rog's employment in which case the Company shall pay Mr. Rog's salary earned
through the termination date, an amount equal to a full year participation in
the short-term bonus plans then in effect, any payment due under other incentive
plans then in effect and the retirement income referred to in the agreement. In
addition, benefits will continue for his spouse and eligible dependents in
accordance with Company policy.

The Company entered into employment agreements as of April 1, 1998 with
Messrs. Baach, Hickey, and Restivo pursuant to which each serves as an Executive
Vice President of the Company. These agreements provide for the payment of base
salaries, subject to annual adjustment. In general, these agreements provide
similar severance arrangements as the employment agreement with Mr. Rog
described above, except that no retirement income will be paid and that medical
and other insurance coverage shall continue for a period of twelve months rather
than to age 65 if the employee is terminated without good cause or if the
employee resigns due to the Company's failure to honor its obligations under the
agreement. The current terms of these agreements each expire on March 31, 2001.

8
<PAGE> 10

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the CEO's compensation
and, upon consultation with the CEO, compensation for the officers of the
Company and its subsidiaries who report directly to the CEO and establishes,
amends, and determines awards under executive compensation plans and programs.
In establishing compensation levels, the Committee takes into account the tax
deductibility limitations imposed under Section 162 (m) of the Internal Revenue
Code.

BASE SALARIES

An independent executive compensation consultant engaged by the Company
reviewed the Compensation Committee's recommended base salary for Mr. Rog, the
Chief Executive Officer, taking into consideration the consulting firm's data
base of competitive information from domestic industrial companies of similar
size and the proxy statements of those companies comprising the peer group
utilized in the performance graph under "Company Stock Performance" for
comparing total returns to shareholders. The Compensation Committee believed it
was necessary to consider not only the peer group of companies but also the
broader group of domestic industrial companies of similar size for its salary
comparisons since this broader group of companies competes for the talent of the
executive officers. The Compensation Committee established, the base salary
level for Mr. Rog at $274,000 effective as of April 1, 1998.

The base salary levels for all of the remaining executive officers were
as determined by the Compensation Committee following a review of recommended
base salary levels with the Chief Executive Officer. These salary levels were
subjectively established based upon the performance of the executive and level
of responsibility.

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

CASH INCENTIVES. The Company maintains a cash bonus program pursuant to
which cash bonuses may be paid to key employees, including the executive
officers. Bonuses are determined based on performance measures approved by the
Board and management's discretion. The performance measures used for fiscal 1998
were based on the Company's consolidated earnings before taxes. __________ key
employees, including the executive officers, received cash bonus awards for
fiscal 1998.

In determining the size of target awards for the Chief Executive
Officer and the Executive Vice Presidents, the Committee subjectively reviewed
the performance of each executive relative to such executive's individual goals.

EQUITY INCENTIVES. The Stock Option subcommittee of the Compensation
Committee granted stock options to the five named executive officers during
fiscal 1998. The options were designed to provide incentives to manage the
Company in the best interests of the shareholders, and to encourage the
executives to remain employed by the Company on a long-term basis. In granting
these awards, the Compensation Committee's determination was based upon the
level of the executive's responsibility with the Company, performance, and the
importance of such executive's retention to the Company. These factors were
weighted subjectively by the Compensation Committee.

Respectfully submitted,

Compensation Committee:
Robert E. Hodge
C. Richard Lynham
Warren F. Rogers
Walter W. Williams

9
<PAGE> 11
COMPANY STOCK PERFORMANCE

Following is a line graph which compares the cumulative Shareholders'
with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index, and an index of peer
companies (the "Peer Group") for the period from September 30, 1993, (the date
the Company's Common Shares began to trade on the New York Stock Exchange) to
March 31, 1998. The companies selected to form the Peer Group index are
companies with revenues generally in the range of $40 to $150 million that offer
a broad range of engineering, environmental, and construction services. They
include Astrotech International, Baker (Michael) Corp., Failure Group Inc.,
Harding Associates Inc., and Tanknology Environmental Inc. The graph assumes
that the value of the investment in the Company's Common Shares and each index
was $100 on September 30, 1993 and that all dividends, if any, were reinvested.

TOTAL RETURN TO SHAREHOLDERS
SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 TO MARCH 31, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN SUMMARY
=================================================================================================
STARTING
BASIS
DESCRIPTION 1993 1994 1995 1966 1997 1998
- ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CORRPRO COMPANY (%) $100.00 $179.55 $154.55 $ 69.32 $ 87.50 $134.65

S & P 500 ($) $100.00 $ 97.68 $112.89 $149.13 $178.69 $264.47

PEER GROUP ONLY ($) $100.00 $ 87.08 $ 56.30 $ 67.26 $ 67.74 $101.47
</TABLE>

(1) The peer group data prior to fiscal 1997 includes the results of Greiner
Engineering, Inc. No results for Greiner Engineering, Inc. were available
for fiscal 1997 and thereafter.

10
<PAGE> 12
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Warren F. Rogers, a member of the Compensation Committee, is president
of Warren Rogers Associates, Inc. (WRA). WRA currently conducts, on behalf of
the Company, statistical evaluation of corrosion data relating to the Company's
customers, primarily in the underground storage tank market. The Company has
worked with WRA since 1985. During fiscal 1998, fees paid to WRA totaled
$471,961. The Company believes that the terms of all transactions and
arrangements with WRA are no less favorable to the Company than similar
transactions and arrangements which might have been entered into with unrelated
parties.

II.
AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

PROPOSAL 2: TO AMEND ARTICLE FOURTH OF THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED COMMON SHARES OF
THE COMPANY

On April 30, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors approved, and
recommended that the shareholders of the Company approve and adopt, an amendment
to the Company's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the "Articles")
to increase from 12,000,000 to 40,000,000 the maximum number of Common Shares,
without par value, that the Company is authorized to issue.

The principal purpose of the proposal is to make available additional
Common Shares for possible stock splits or dividends, employee benefit plans,
acquisitions, public or private stock offerings and other corporate purposes.
The Company's Board of Directors has approved and adopted a 5-for-4 stock split
in the form of a stock dividend payable on June 19, 1998 to shareholders of
record as of June 5, 1998. The Articles provide that the Company's maximum
number of authorized shares is 13,000,000 shares, comprised of a maximum of
12,000,000 Common Shares, without par value, and a maximum of 1,000,000 Serial
Preferred Shares, without par value. As of May 22, 1998, there were 6,360,110
Common Shares (7,950,138 after giving effect to the stock split) and no Serial
Preferred Shares outstanding. In addition, as of that date, the Company had
reserved 1,105,590 Common Shares for issuance pursuant to its existing stock
option plans (1,381,988 after giving effect to the stock split). As a result,
the Company had, after giving effect to the stock split, only 2,667,874 Common
Shares available for possible stock splits or dividends, employee benefit plans,
acquisitions, public or private stock offerings and other corporate purposes.
The Company does not presently have any agreements or understandings with
respect to the issuance of additional Common Shares. Except under certain
circumstances provided for in the Rules of the New York Stock Exchange, the Ohio
Revised Code and the Articles, the issuance of additional Common Shares would
not require any further shareholder approval.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the Common
Shares is required to approve and adopt the proposed amendment. Thus,
abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of voting against the
proposed amendment. The full text of the proposed amendment is attached hereto
as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL.

III.
ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

PROPOSAL 3 TO ADOPT AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN OF CORRPRO
COMPANIES, INC. TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE
THEREUNDER FROM 1,285,738 TO 1,585,738.

THE COMMON SHARE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROPOSAL 3 HAS BEEN
ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE EFFECT OF THE COMPANY'S 5-FOR-4 STOCK SPLIT EFFECTED IN
THE FORM OF A 25% SHARE DIVIDEND ON JUNE 19, 1998. The Company's

11
<PAGE> 13

1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "1997 Plan") is intended to encourage
ownership of the Company's Common Stock by officers, other key employees, and
consultants of the Company, to attract and retain key personnel, and to provide
additional incentives to promote the success of the Company. The 1997 Plan
provides for Awards of up to 468,750 new shares plus 816,988 shares which were
subject to options previously granted and outstanding prior to the adoption of
the 1997 Plan but only to the extent of the surrender, lapse, forfeiture,
termination, or exercise of such previously granted options, for an aggregate of
1,285,738 of Company's Common Shares. As of May 22, 1998, options to purchase up
to an aggregate of 1,223,836 of the Company's Common Shares (38,008 of which had
been exercised as of that date) have been granted under the 1997 Plan out of the
1,285,738 shares that had been reserved for issuance. Hence, only 61,902 Common
Shares remain available for future grants. The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors, therefore, recommended to the Board of Directors that the
Plan be amended to increase by 300,000 the maximum number of Common Shares
available for distribution under the 1997 Plan in order to enable the Company to
continue to provide an essential benefit to its key management personnel.
Accordingly, the Board of Directors adopted, subject to shareholder approval, an
amendment to the 1997 Plan (the "Amendment") increasing the number of shares
available for issuance. Shareholders are being asked to approve the increase of
300,000 additional Common Shares to be available for future grants under the
1997 Plan.

The Board of Directors believes that it is desirable to encourage key
employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to acquire a proprietary interest
in the Company or to increase such proprietary interest as they may already
hold, thereby increasing the incentive of key employees and non-employee
Directors to promote the interest of the Company and its shareholders. For this
reason, the Board of Directors adopted the Amendment to the 1997 Plan. In
addition, with the Company's strategic growth plan and acquisition activity, it
is imperative that the Company have available incentives to attract and retain
key management talent. Accordingly, the Board of Directors and management
believe the approval of the Amendment to the 1997 Plan is in the best interest
of the Company and recommend that shareholders vote in favor of the proposal.
The following is a brief description of the material features of the 1997 Plan.

The 1997 Plan authorizes the grant to officers, other key employees and
consultants of awards ("Awards") consisting of non-qualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), and restricted stock and stock bonus awards.
Any shares issued upon exercise of Awards, forfeited restricted stock Awards, or
shares subject to issuance upon exercise of Awards which are not issued because
of a surrender, lapse, expiration, or forfeiture, or termination of any such
Award shall once again be available for issuance in satisfaction of Awards. The
Stock Option Committee, a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee, (the
"Committee") administers the 1997 Plan and has sole discretion to determine
those persons to whom Awards are granted, the number of Awards granted, the
provisions applicable to each Award and the time periods during which Awards may
be exercisable.

The Committee may grant non-qualified stock options. Unless the
Committee determines otherwise, the option price per share of any non-qualified
stock option shall be the fair market value of the shares of the Company's
Common Shares on the date the option is granted. Fair market value is generally
the closing price of the Company's Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange
on the last business day prior to the date on which the value is to be
determined. Options granted under the 1997 Plan will be exercisable for a term
of not more than ten years from the date of grant.

SARs are rights to receive an amount in cash or Common Shares of the
Company of a combination thereof as determined by the Committee, no greater than
the excess of the fair market value of the Common Shares of the Company on the
date the SAR is exercised over the fair market value of the Common Shares of the
Company on the date the SAR is granted (or in the case of SARs granted in tandem
with options, in the Committee's sole discretion, the option price of the shares
subject to the option).

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, grant SARs in tandem with
options or on a stand alone basis. SARs granted in tandem with options may only
be exercisable to the extent the related option is exercisable and shall be for
a term as determined by the Committee. The term may not exceed 10 years and may
expire prior to the term of the related option. Each SAR granted on a stand
alone basis shall be exercisable to the extent and for such term as may be
approved by the Committee. In no event shall any amounts paid pursuant to an SAR
exceed the difference between the fair market value of the underlying shares on
the date of exercise and the option price of the related option.

12
<PAGE> 14

Restricted stock awards are rights granted by the Committee to receive
Common Shares subject to forfeiture and other restrictions determined by the
Committee. Until the restrictions with respect to any restricted stock awards
lapse, the shares will be held by the Company and may not be sold or otherwise
transferred by the employee. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee,
until the restrictions lapse, the shares will be forfeited if the employee's
employment is terminated for any reason other than death, disability, retirement
or the employee's attainment of 65 years of age. Unless the Committee determines
otherwise, one-third of the Common Shares subject to a restricted stock award
will vest on each anniversary of the date of grant. The Committee may require
participants to whom restricted stock awards are granted to pay the Company an
amount equal to the aggregate par value, if any, of the shares issued.

Stock bonus awards may also be granted under the 1997 Plan, on such
terms and conditions as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, determine.
The Committee may require participants to whom stock bonus awards are granted to
pay the Company an amount equal to the aggregate par value, if any, of the
shares issued.

Awards granted under the 1997 Plan may be subject to adjustment upon a
stock dividend, stock split, reclassification, recapitalization, merger,
consolidation, combination, or exchange of shares, separation, reorganization,
liquidation or similar events affecting the Company's Common Shares. An Award
will not be transferable, other than to Permitted Transferees (as defined in the
1997 Plan), by will or the laws of descent and distribution or, in certain
circumstances, pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order, and an Award
may be exercised, during the lifetime of the holder of the Award, only by the
holder, or the holder's personal representative in the event of disability.

In the case of a "change in control" (as defined in the 1997 Plan) of
the Company, the Board of Directors of the Company may, in its sole discretion,
determine, on a case by case basis, taking into account the purposes of the 1997
Plan, that each Award granted under the 1997 Plan will terminate 90 days after
occurrence of such "change in control," but, in the event of any such
termination (i) an option or SAR holder will generally have the right,
commencing at least five days prior to the "change in control" and subject to
any other limitation on the exercise of the option in effect on date of
exercise, to immediately exercise any options in full to the extent they
previously have not been exercised, and (ii) restricted stock awards will vest.

The 1997 Plan will terminate on April 28, 2007, and Awards shall not be
granted under the 1997 Plan after that date although the terms of any Awards may
be amended in accordance with the 1997 Plan at any date prior to the end of the
term of such Awards. Any Awards outstanding at the time of termination of the
1997 Plan will continue in full force and effect according to the terms and
conditions of the Award and the 1997 Plan.

The 1997 Plan may be amended by the Board of Directors of the Company,
provided that stockholder approval will be necessary as required under Rule
16b-3 of the regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
(the "Exchange Act"), and provided further that no amendment may impair any
rights of any holder of an Award previously granted under the 1997 Plan without
the holder's consent.

Certain of the federal income tax consequences to the Company and
participants in the 1997 Plan of the grant and the exercise of Awards under
currently applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, are as described below. For persons subject to Section 16 of the
Exchange Act ("Section 16") the calculation and terms of income recognition is
generally deferred until such time as the employee is no longer subject to suit
for "short swing profit".

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES - NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS. The
issuance of a non-qualified stock option under the 1997 Plan will not result in
any taxable income to the recipient or a tax deduction to the Company at the
time of grant. Generally, an employee to whom a non-qualified stock option has
been granted will

13
<PAGE> 15
recognize ordinary income at the time the employee exercises the option and
receives Common Shares in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value
of such shares on the date of exercise over the option price.

The Company is generally entitled to a tax deduction corresponding to
the amount of income recognized by the employee as a result of the exercise of a
non-qualified stock option for the year in which the employee recognizes such
income for federal income tax purposes.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES - SARS. A participant will not
recognize taxable income upon the grant of an SAR. The participant will
generally recognize ordinary income for federal income tax purposes in an amount
equal to the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of the Common Shares
received upon exercise of the SAR, in the tax year in which payment is made in
respect of an SAR, and the Company will normally be entitled to a tax deduction
for an equivalent amount for the same year

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES - RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS AND STOCK
BONUS AWARDS. Generally, an employee to whom a restricted stock award or stock
bonus award is made will recognize ordinary income for federal income tax
purposes in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Common
Shares received at the time the shares first become transferable or are no
longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture over the purchase price, if
any, paid by the employee for such Common Shares, and such amount will generally
then be deductible for federal income tax purposes by the Company. For tax
purposes, in addition to other restrictions, the Company's Common Shares are
considered to be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture as long as the sale
of the shares could subject the employee to suit under the "short swing profit"
provisions of Section 16. Alternatively, if the recipient of a restricted stock
award or stock bonus Award so elects, the recipient will recognize ordinary
income on the date of grant in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market
value of the Company's Common Shares (without taking into account any lapse
restrictions) on such date, over the purchase price, if any, paid by the
employee for such Common Shares, and such amount will generally then be
deductible by the Company. In the event of the forfeiture of Common Shares
included in a restricted stock award or stock bonus award, the employee will not
be entitled to any deduction except to the extent the employee paid for such
Common Shares. Upon a sale of the Common Shares included in the restricted stock
award or stock bonus award, the participant will recognize capital gain or loss,
as the case may be, equal to the difference between the amount realized from
such sale and the employee's tax basis for such Common Shares.

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 1997 PLAN. The affirmative
votes cast by the holders of a majority of the Common Shares, present in person
or by proxy at the meeting, is required for the adoption of the Amendment to the
1997 Plan; provided that such majority must also exceed 50% of the total number
of Common Shares eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting. Thus, shareholders who
vote to abstain will in effect be voting against the proposal. Brokers who hold
Common Shares as nominees will have discretionary authority to vote such shares
if they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owners by the
tenth day before the meeting, provided that this Proxy Statement is transmitted
to the beneficial owners at least 15 days before the meeting. Broker non-votes,
however, are not counted as present and entitled to vote for determining whether
this proposal has been approved and have no effect on its outcome.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 1997
PLAN.

IV.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE OF REGULATIONS
(PROPOSALS 4-7)

GENERAL

On April 30, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors approved, and
recommended that the Company's shareholders approve and adopt, four separate
amendments to the Company's Amended and Restated Code of

14
<PAGE> 16

Regulations (the "Regulations"). The proposals would amend the Regulations to
(i) require the affirmative vote of 60% of the voting power of the shareholders
to establish the number of directors, when the shareholders act to establish the
number of directors; (ii) limit the removal of directors to "for cause" grounds;
(iii) establish certain procedures applicable to the proposal and conduct of
business at annual and special meetings of the Company's shareholders; and (iv)
amend the amendment provision of the Regulations to clarify the relationship
between the Articles and the Regulations.

Shareholders are being asked to vote on each of the four proposals
separately, as required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The vote required to adopt each proposal is set forth below in the description
of the individual proposal. For future convenience, each of the amendments that
are adopted by the shareholders at the 1998 Annual Meeting will be incorporated
into an amended, restated and corrected version of the Regulations, to be known
as the "1998 Amended and Restated Code of Regulations." Accordingly, a vote to
approve any proposed amendment will be deemed to be a vote to adopt a 1998
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations incorporating that amendment and making
any non-substantive typographical and clerical corrections as appropriate.

The text of each of the proposed amendments is included in the Exhibits
attached to this Proxy Statement. (For ease of comparison, the current text of
each section of the Regulations proposed to be amended is reproduced immediately
following the text of the proposed amendment.) Although the following
description is a summary of the material changes made by the proposed
amendments, it should be read in conjunction with the full text of the proposed
amendments as set forth in the Exhibits, and is expressly qualified by reference
thereto.

PURPOSE OF AMENDMENTS

Following the adoption of the Company's shareholder rights plan in
July, 1997, the Company commenced a review of the Articles and the Regulations
to determine whether the Articles and Regulations provided the Board of
Directors with sufficient flexibility to respond in the event of an unsolicited,
and potentially coercive, attempt to acquire control of the Company. This review
was not in response to any actual or perceived threat of any specific takeover
attempt; however, in view of the significant increase in recent months of the
scope and pace of corporate mergers in many industries, the Company determined
that such a review would be in the long-term interests of the Company and its
shareholders by identifying any need that might exist to revise the Company's
corporate governance procedures to provide a further measure of preparedness,
prior to the existence of any actual or perceived threat of a potentially
inappropriate takeover attempt. As a result of this review, the Company
identified four aspects in which the Company's existing corporate governance
mechanisms could hinder the ability of the Board of Directors to respond with
more flexibility to unsolicited and coercive attempts to acquire control of the
Company. First, a potentially hostile bidder could attempt to "pack" the Board
of Directors by manipulating the provisions of the Regulations relating to the
number of directors and the classification of the Board. Second, and similarly,
under certain circumstances, a potentially hostile bidder in a proxy
solicitation could use the existing provisions of the Regulations to remove any
or all of the Company's directors without any cause by the vote of a majority of
the Company's outstanding shares and elect directors which would approve the
bidder's offer. In either of these cases, the bidder could more readily attempt
to force the Company and its shareholders into accepting the bidder's offer
without having had a chance to review the offer with sufficient thoroughness.
Third, a potential bidder could engage in a proxy solicitation in connection
with a coercive offer for the Company at, or shortly prior to, a meeting of the
Company's shareholders, and the Company under certain circumstances could be
limited in its ability to respond in an appropriate manner to permit the
shareholders to consider alternatives to the coercive offer. Fourth, while the
Articles appeared to establish higher voting requirements than mandated by Ohio
law to amend certain provisions of the Articles and the Regulations, making it
harder for a potential bidder to amend such provisions, the relationship between
the Articles and the Regulations was unclear. As a result, the Company desires
to clarify the amendment provisions of the Regulations to more explicitly detail
and conform those higher vote requirements to those set forth in the Articles.
Therefore, the Company crafted and the Board of Directors approved the four
proposals set forth below to alleviate these shortcomings in the Regulations.

15
<PAGE> 17

POSSIBLE ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS

As a general matter, the Company does not believe that the amendments
presented to the shareholders for approval are intended to inhibit a potential
suitor from engaging the Board of Directors in discussions or negotiations and
are not designed to prevent a fair and appropriate offer from consideration.
Rather, in addition to the clarification or establishment of certain procedural
requirements, the proposed amendments are intended to help assure that the Board
has the time and flexibility required to adequately respond to proposals
(whether or not takeover related) in an orderly and well-informed fashion.
Notwithstanding those intended purposes, the proposed amendments to the
Regulations could have the effect of deterring potential bidders from attempting
to take control of the Company by initiating either an unsolicited offer for the
Common Shares or a proxy solicitation to acquire control of the Company, or
both. Such a contest for control of the Company could increase the market price
of the Common Shares, at least temporarily. Under those circumstances,
therefore, the Company's shareholders could be deprived of an opportunity to
sell their Common Shares at a higher price if the proposed amendments to the
Regulations are adopted. Additionally, because some or all of the Company's
directors and officers could be replaced by a bidder either during an
unsolicited offer or proxy solicitation or immediately thereafter, the adoption
of the proposed amendments may have the incidental effect of hindering such
changes in the Company's directors and officers. However, the Board of Directors
believes that the proposed amendments will enhance the Board's ability to act in
the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders in response to an
unsolicited offer for the Company, particularly if such offer were combined with
a proxy solicitation and designed to coerce shareholders into accepting it, and
that this positive result outweighs the potential for negative anti-takeover
effects that might result from the proposed amendments.

PROPOSAL 4: TO AMEND SECTION 4.2 OF THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF
REGULATIONS TO REQUIRE A 60% VOTE OF THE SHAREHOLDERS TO ESTABLISH THE NUMBER OF
DIRECTORS

The proposed amendment to Section 4.2 of the Regulations would permit
the shareholders to increase or decrease the number of directors of the Company,
upon the vote of sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of the shares (or of
the classes of shares) of the Company. At present, Section 4.2 of the
Regulations allows a majority of the directors to increase or decrease the
number of directors; however, neither the directors nor the shareholders may
reduce the number of directors to fewer than seven (7) without amending the
Regulations. Since the current Section 4.2 of the Regulations does not address
shareholders' ability to alter the size of the Board, Ohio law would allow the
shareholders to fix or change the number of directors by a majority of those
shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote, which could be significantly
less than a majority of the voting power of the Company's shares. In the event
that a bidder were able to obtain sufficient representation on the Board of
Directors, it could "pack" the Board by increasing the size of the Board and
appointing to the resulting vacancies persons who were committed to accept the
bidder's offer for the Company, regardless of the long-term best interests of
the Company or its shareholders. If the proposed amendment is adopted, the vote
of 60% of the voting power of the shares (or of the classes of shares) would be
sufficient to change the size of the Board, and thus could mitigate the
likelihood of such attempt to "pack" the Board, and would ensure that holders of
at least 60% of the Company's voting power vote in favor of this important
decision. The current provision permitting a majority of the directors to
establish the size of the Board also would remain in effect if the proposed
amendment is adopted; as a result, either a majority of the directors or 60% of
the voting power of the Company's shares would have the power to establish the
number of directors on the Board of Directors.

The affirmative vote of sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of the
Common Shares is required to approve the proposed amendment. Thus, abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the effect of voting against the proposed
amendment. The full text of the proposed amendment is included in Exhibit B to
this Proxy Statement, and the foregoing discussion of such amendment is
expressly qualified by reference thereto.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL.

16
<PAGE> 18

PROPOSAL 5: TO AMEND SECTION 4.5 OF THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF
REGULATIONS TO LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS TO "FOR CAUSE" GROUNDS AND REQUIRE
A 60% VOTE

The proposed amendment to Section 4.5 of the Regulations would limit
the removal of a director or directors by shareholder vote to "for cause"
grounds, and would require the vote of sixty percent (60%) of the voting power
of the shares of the Company (or of the classes of shares) for such removal. At
present, Section 4.5 of the Regulations allows for the removal of any and all
directors "as provided by statute or by other lawful procedures." The Ohio
Revised Code provides that, in the absence of an express provision to the
contrary in the Articles or the Regulations, any and all directors may be
removed by the vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power entitling
them to elect directors in place of those to be removed. Under these provisions,
in the event of an unsolicited tender offer and proxy solicitation for the
Company, if the bidder owned or held proxies representing a majority of the
voting power of the Company's Common Shares, the bidder would be able to remove
any and all members of the Board of Directors without any cause therefor and
replace them with persons of its own choosing who were committed to accepting
the bidder's offer, irrespective of whether the offer was in the best interests
of the remaining shareholders. This ability to force a change in the Board of
Directors would inhibit the Board's ability to negotiate with the bidder in such
an unsolicited tender offer to obtain more favorable terms for the Company's
shareholders. Under the proposed amendment, the Company's directors could be
removed only "for cause," restricting a bidder's ability to force a transaction
with the Company by altering the composition of the Board of Directors. However,
because the proposed amendment would apply to any removal of directors, whether
or not in the context of an unsolicited tender offer, it would make it harder
for shareholders to remove directors, which could have the incidental effect of
hindering shareholders' ability to change the composition of the Board of
Directors. The Company believes that, given its process for screening and
nominating qualified candidates for the Board, that the likelihood of this
incidental effect arising is fairly remote.

The affirmative vote of sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of the
Common Shares is required to approve the proposed amendment. Thus, abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the effect of voting against the proposed
amendment. The full text of the proposed amendment is included in Exhibit C to
this Proxy Statement, and the foregoing discussion of such amendment is
expressly qualified by reference thereto.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSAL 6: TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS TO
ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE PROPOSAL AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS AT SHAREHOLDERS'
MEETINGS

To improve the Company's corporate governance procedures, the Board of
Directors has approved, and recommended that the Company's shareholders approve
and adopt, amendments to the series of provisions of the Regulations relating to
the procedures by which the business of the Company is proposed for and
conducted at annual and special meetings of the Company's shareholders. This
proposal will result in the amendment of several distinct sections of the
Regulations, and is summarized below under several separate subject headings.
Since this proposal is designed to effect a comprehensive amendment of the
provisions of the Regulations relating to annual and special meetings of
shareholders, and the conduct of business at such meetings, shareholders are
being asked to vote on the proposed amendments to the Regulations as a single
proposal. If the proposal is approved and adopted, all of the proposed changes
to the Regulations described below will be incorporated into the 1998 Amended
and Restated Code of Regulations of the Company; if the proposal is not approved
and adopted, none of the proposed changes described below will be effective.

The affirmative vote of sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of the
Common Shares is required to approve the proposal summarized below. Thus,
abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of voting against the
proposal. The full text of the amendments to the Regulations that will be
effected by the proposal is included in Exhibit D to this Proxy Statement, and
the following discussion of such proposal is expressly qualified by reference
thereto.

17
<PAGE> 19

Annual Meetings

The Regulations provide for the Board of Directors to set the time and
place of an annual meeting of shareholders, and the business to be considered at
the meeting. However, the Board does not have the express authority to postpone
a previously scheduled meeting. The proposal would amend Section 3.1 of the
Regulations, dealing with annual meetings, to state explicitly the authority of
a majority of the directors to so postpone an annual meeting. The Company
believes that this amendment would permit the Board maximum flexibility in the
context of any last-minute or disruptive proposal, including an unsolicited
attempt to acquire the Company: the Board would have the opportunity to delay a
previously scheduled meeting at which the bidder intended to make an unsolicited
offer, in order to investigate the offer and determine a response that would
more carefully consider the long-term interests of the Company and its
shareholders.

To coordinate with the proposed amendments to the Regulations regarding
shareholder requests to bring proposals before an annual meeting of
shareholders, as discussed below, a provision also would be added to Section 3.1
of the Regulations that would define the business that could properly come
before an annual meeting. To properly come before an annual meeting, business
would have to be specified in the notice of meeting, or in any supplement to
that notice, given in accordance with the Regulations, brought before the
meeting by the chairman of the meeting or by or at the direction of the Board of
Directors, or properly requested by a shareholder to be brought before the
meeting in accordance with the amended provisions relating to shareholder
proposals, as described below. This provision will permit the Company to limit
the business of an annual meeting to those proposals as to which the Company has
had sufficient opportunity to be informed of the nature of the proposal and to
develop an appropriate response.

The Regulations currently provide that, upon due notice, the
shareholders may consider at any annual meeting any matter which could be
properly considered and acted upon at a special meeting of shareholders, in
which case the annual meeting shall be deemed to be a special meeting for the
purpose of conducting such business. The proposed amendment would more closely
conform this provision to the provisions of Section 3.2 of the Regulations
relating to the conduct of business at special meeting. The amendment would
permit a notice to be given with respect to a proposed item of business, in
accordance with the procedures for the calling of a special meeting. The Company
believes that this amendment to Section 3.1 of the Regulations would not result
in any substantive change to the Regulations.

Special Meetings

The Regulations currently allow a special meeting to be called by the
Chairman of the Board, the President of the Company, the directors by action at
a meeting, a majority of directors acting without a meeting, or the holders of
shares entitling them to exercise more than 50% of the voting power of the
shares of the Company entitled to vote at the meeting. The proposal would amend
the Regulations to conform to the applicable provisions of the Ohio Revised Code
which permit the maximum threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting to
be the affirmative vote of up to 50%, but no more than 50%, of the shares
outstanding and entitled to vote to call a special meeting. The proposal also
would amend the provisions permitting the Board of Directors to call a special
meeting. At present, a majority of the directors present at a meeting of the
Board (which could be less than a majority of the Board) could act to call a
special meeting. Finally, the proposal would amend the Regulations to require
that a majority of the directors acting at a meeting would be required to call a
special meeting. As a result of these amendments, a special meeting could be
called by the Chairman of the Board, the President of the Company, a majority of
the directors, either by action at a meeting or acting without a meeting, or the
holders of shares entitling them to exercise 50% of the voting power of the
Company entitled to vote at the meeting.

At present, the Regulations provide that the only business that can be
considered at a special meeting is the business specified in the call for the
special meeting. In the event of a special meeting called in the context of an
unsolicited offer for the Company, the Company might not be permitted to offer
counter-proposals for consideration at the special meeting, which could prevent
the shareholders from considering alternatives to the offer that might be more
favorable to the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Accordingly, the provision contained in Section 3.2 of the Regulations that
defines the business that can be considered at a

18
<PAGE> 20

special meeting would be amended to provide that the only business that could be
conducted at a meeting would be that business specified in the call for the
special meeting (as is currently the case) or business brought before the
meeting by the chairman of the meeting or by or at the direction of the Board of
Directors. This provision would permit the Board of Directors, in the context of
a special meeting called in connection with of an unsolicited offer for the
Company, to present or direct the presentation to the meeting of alternative
proposals. This change would give the Board of Directors increased flexibility
in responding to an unsolicited offer to acquire the Company and would afford
the shareholders with the opportunity to be presented with more possible
alternatives for their possible consideration at such meetings.

Shareholder Proposals

At present, the Regulations limit consideration of shareholder
proposals at a meeting of shareholders to only those that were properly included
in a proxy or information statement furnished to shareholders in compliance with
Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the regulations
promulgated thereunder. While this ensures that a shareholder proposal conforms
to the requirements of the SEC's proxy rules - whether it is included in the
Company's proxy statement or distributed in the proposing shareholder's separate
proxy statement - it does not necessarily give the Company meaningful advance
notice of a proposal, particularly when a potentially hostile party decides to
file its own proxy materials with the SEC. In the event of an unsolicited tender
offer combined with a proxy solicitation, the Company and the Board of Directors
could be left with inadequate opportunity to review the proposed transaction and
to negotiate with the bidder for improved terms for the Company's shareholders.
The proposed amendment would amend Section 3.3 of the Regulations, which governs
the consideration of shareholder proposals, to require that a shareholder who
wishes to bring business before an annual meeting of shareholders, first, to be
a shareholder of record and, second, to provide, no later than 60 calendar days
prior to the date fixed for the annual meeting, written notice to the Secretary
of the Company of the business to be brought before the meeting. Such notice
would be required to contain the business desired to be brought before the
annual meeting, the shareholder's name and address, the number of shares owned
by the shareholder or by any "beneficial owner" (such as a person owning shares
through a brokerage account) on whose behalf the proposal was being made, and
any material interest of the shareholder or the beneficial owner in the business
proposed to be brought before the meeting by the shareholder. The requirement
that the shareholder comply with the applicable SEC rules would not be affected
by the proposed amendment. Additionally, the amended Regulations would provide
that this provision would not be interpreted to affect a shareholder's right,
under the SEC's proxy rules, to request that a shareholder proposal be included
in the Company's proxy statement for the annual meeting.

The proposed amendment would establish a definite advance date by which
the Company must be notified of the shareholder's intention to bring business
before the meeting, and would require the shareholder to describe that business
in detail. The Company believes that the proposed 60-day time period would
afford the Company a reasonable time period to investigate the issue(s) raised
by the shareholder, to determine an appropriate response and to communicate the
nature of that response properly to the Company's shareholders and/or other
constituencies. Further, by requiring a shareholder to describe the proposed
business in detail, the Company believes that it will have the opportunity to
investigate and respond to the specific subject matter of the proposal. Finally,
the proposed reference to a shareholder's right to request the inclusion of a
proposal in the Company's proxy statement would clarify the fact that the
proposed notice provisions will not be used to impermissibly restrict the right
of the Company's shareholders to advance proposals in compliance with applicable
law.

Conduct of Business at Meetings

The Regulations provide that the order of business at a meeting of the
shareholders shall be "as determined by the chairman of the meeting," who may be
the Chairman of the Board or another Director or officer of the Company or, in
the absence of any such person, a chairman elected by the shareholders present
at the meeting. This provision gives the chairman only the power to determine
the order in which business will be conducted. Further, the Regulations do not
explicitly confer on the chairman of the meeting the authority to adjourn such
meeting to a later time. The Company believes that there are numerous situations
which could arise at a meeting of the shareholders in which the chairman of the
meeting might need to take additional actions to maintain the orderly conduct of
business at that meeting of shareholders, and the current language does not

19
<PAGE> 21
explicitly give the chairman of the meeting the specific power to take such
additional actions. Therefore, to provide explicit guidelines and to clarify
situations in which the chairman will be able to prevent disruption of the
meeting, the proposal would amend Section 4.10 of the Regulations to give the
chairman of a meeting the specific power to: (a) limit the persons, other than
shareholders of record and their duly appointed proxies, who may attend the
meeting; (b) determine whether any shareholder of record or his or her proxy, or
any other person, should be excluded from the meeting because such shareholder,
proxy or other person has disrupted or is likely to disrupt the meeting; (c)
determine the circumstances in which a person may make a statement or ask
questions at the meeting; and (d) establish such other procedures as the
chairman may deem appropriate for the orderly conduct of the meeting. The
proposed amendment also would give the chairman of the meeting the express power
to adjourn a meeting of the shareholders to a later time, whether or not a
quorum is then present at the meeting. In the context of an unsolicited offer
for the Company, this provision would permit the chairman to adjourn or postpone
a meeting when doing so would help prevent premature consideration of a
shareholder proposal that included a coercive or inadequate offer. Finally, to
coordinate with the proposed changes to the Regulations regarding the
consideration of business properly brought before annual and special meetings of
shareholders, as discussed above, the proposed amendment would give the chairman
of the meeting the power to determine whether business was properly brought
before the meeting and to refuse to recognize business not properly brought.
This change would permit the chairman of the meeting to prevent the
consideration of business which the Company had been unable to appropriately
review and consider .

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSAL 7: TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS TO
CONFORM TO THE ARTICLES AND PROVIDE ENHANCED SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
TO AMEND CERTAIN PROVISIONS.

The Regulations presently provide that the Regulations can be amended
only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the Company,
which currently would be represented by holders of more than 50% of all
outstanding Common Shares. Article Seventh of the Articles expressly requires
the affirmative vote of 60% of the voting power to approve any amendment to the
Articles or the Regulations which affects "the manner in which shareholder
proposals are considered at a shareholder meeting, the classification, election
or tenure of office of the directors, or the indemnification of the Company's
directors, officers or employees." Since the provisions of the Articles take
precedence over the Regulations, the Company desires to explicitly conform and
clarify the provisions of the Regulations with respect to when a supermajority
shareholder vote is required. Therefore, the Board of Directors has approved,
and has recommended that the Company's shareholders approve and adopt, an
amendment to the amendment provision contained in Article XI of the Regulations.
As amended, this provision would allow the holders of shares representing a
majority of the voting power of the Company to amend any provision of the Code,
except for the following specifically identified provisions, which in conformity
with the supermajority voting requirements of the Articles, could be amended
only by the affirmative vote of 60% of the voting power of the shares (or of the
classes of shares) of the Company:

(i) Sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.10 of the Regulations, relating
to annual meetings of the shareholders, special meetings of
the shareholders, the consideration of shareholder proposals
at meetings of the shareholders, and the conduct of business
at meetings of the shareholders, respectively;

(ii) Sections 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 of the Regulations, relating to
the number of directors, the classification of the Board of
Directors, the election of directors, and the tenure of office
of directors, respectively;

<PAGE> 22

(iii) Article VI of the Regulations, relating to the indemnification
of directors and officers of the Corporation; and

(iv) Article XI of the Regulations, relating to the amendment of
the Regulations.

By requiring the affirmative vote of 60% of the Company's outstanding
shares to amend the identified provisions, the Company will be able to insulate
such provisions from amendment by a potential bidder for the Company without the
express approval of shares representing 60% of the voting power of the Company,
and thereby preserve the flexibility of the Board of Directors to respond in the
event of an unsolicited offer for the Company.

All other amendments to the Regulations could be made by shares
representing a majority of the voting power of the Company, which is the lowest
threshold for approval allowed under Ohio law, and would enable the Company to
react as flexibly as possible to corporate opportunities.

The affirmative vote of sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of the
Common Shares is required to approve the proposed amendment. Thus, abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the effect of voting against the proposed
amendment. The full text of the proposed amendment is included in Exhibit E to
this Proxy Statement, and the foregoing discussion of such amendment is
expressly qualified by reference thereto.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL.

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Company is incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio, which
do not require approval by shareholders of the selection of independent
auditors. A representative of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP ("KPMG") is expected to be
present at the meeting. KPMG acted as independent auditors for the Company for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998. The Audit Committee will select the
company's auditors for fiscal 1999.

On October 18, 1996, Price Waterhouse LLP ("PW") resigned as the
independent accountants of the Company. The reports of PW on the Company's
financial statements for each of the past two fiscal years contained no adverse
opinions or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle, except the report of PW on the
financial statement for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995 included an
explanatory paragraph relating to a material uncertainty regarding litigation.

In connection with its audits for the two most recent fiscal years and
through October 18, 1996, there were no disagreements between the Company and PW
on the matter of accounting principle or practices, financial statement
disclosures, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved
to the satisfaction of PW would have caused them to make reference thereto in
their report on the financial statements for such years.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996 and through October 18,
1996, there have been no "reportable events" as defined in Regulation S-K Item
304(a)(1)(v). In connection with the audit of the Company's financial statements
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995, PW advised the Audit Committee of the
Registrant that it was no longer able to rely upon representations of the
Company's then Chief Financial Officer ("former CFO"). The Audit Committee
immediately caused the former CFO to be placed on leave of absence. The former
CFO was subsequently discharged and replaced.

On November 15, 1996, the Company engaged KPMG as the principal
independent accountants to audit its financial statements.

21
<PAGE> 23

GENERAL

VOTING AT THE MEETING

Shareholders of record at the close of business on May 22, 1998 are
entitled to vote at the meeting. On that date, which was prior to the effective
date of the 5-for-4 stock split of the Company's Common Shares, a total of
6,360,110 Common Shares were outstanding. Holders of shares of Common Shares
have no cumulative voting rights. Each Common Share is entitled to one vote. The
closing price (unadjusted for the 5-for-4 stock split) of a Common Share on May
22, 1998 was $15 15/16.

Holders of shares of Common Shares have no cumulative voting rights.
Provided a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the Common
Shares represented and voting, in person or by proxy, at any meeting of
shareholders is required under Ohio law to elect Directors.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any shareholder who wishes to submit a proposal to be considered for
inclusion in next year's Proxy Statement should send the proposal to the Company
addressed to the Secretary on or before February 15, 1999.

PROXY SOLICITATION

The Company will bear the expense of the solicitation of proxies. In
addition to requesting proxies by mail, officers and employees of the Company
may request proxies by telephone or in person. The Company has retained Beacon
Hill Partners, Inc., 90 Broad Street, New York, New York 10004, to assist in the
solicitation for an estimated fee of $_______, plus expenses not in excess of
$_______.

The Company will ask custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries to send
proxy material to beneficial owners in order to obtain voting instructions. The
Company will, upon request, reimburse them for their reasonable expenses for
mailing the proxy material.

The Company's Annual Report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998,
is enclosed herewith.

MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES TO
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NAMED HEREIN, FOR PROPOSAL 2 (AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY'S
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES FROM
12,000,000 TO 40,000,000), FOR PROPOSALS (AMENDMENT OF THE 1997 LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN OF CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE THEREUNDER FROM 1,285,738 TO 1,585,738) AND
PROPOSALS 4, 5, 6, AND 7 (AMENDMENTS OF THE COMPANY'S CODE OF REGULATIONS) .

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented
at the meeting. However, if other matters do properly come before the meeting,
the persons named in the Proxy will vote on these matters in accordance with
their best judgment.

22
<PAGE> 24

For the Board of Directors
Corrpro Companies, Inc.

Neal R. Restivo
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer

June 15, 1998

23
<PAGE> 25

EXHIBIT A

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

PROPOSAL 2 -- TO AMEND THE FIRST SENTENCE OF ARTICLE FOURTH OF THE COMPANY'S
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

The maximum number of shares which the Corporation is authorized to have
outstanding is forty-one million (41,000,000) shares, consisting of forty
million (40,000,000) Common Shares, without par value, and one million
(1,000,000) Serial Preferred Shares, without par value, of which five hundred
thousand (500,000) shares shall be voting and five hundred thousand (500,000)
shares shall be non-voting.

THE FIRST SENTENCE OF ARTICLE FOURTH PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

The maximum number of shares which the Corporation is authorized to
have outstanding is thirteen million (13,000,000) shares, consisting of
twelve million (12,000,000) Common Shares, without par value, and one
million (1,000,000) Serial Preferred Shares, without par value, of
which five hundred thousand (500,000) shares shall be voting and five
hundred thousand (500,000) shares shall be non-voting.

24
<PAGE> 26

EXHIBIT B

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS

PROPOSAL 4 -- TO AMEND SECTION 4.2 OF THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF
REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 4.2 - NUMBER. The number of directors shall be seven (7). The
number of directors may be increased or decreased by (i) action of the Board of
Directors upon the vote of a majority of the directors, or (ii) the vote of
holders of shares entitling them to exercise at least sixty percent (60%) of the
voting power of the shares of the Corporation; but in no event shall the number
of directors be less than seven (7).

SECTION 4.2 PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 4.2 - NUMBER. The number of directors shall be seven
(7). The number of directors may be increased or decreased by action of
the Board of Directors upon the vote of a majority of the directors,
but in no event shall the number of directors be less than seven (7).

25
<PAGE> 27

EXHIBIT C

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS

PROPOSAL 5 -- TO AMEND SECTION 4.5 OF THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF
REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 4.5 - TENURE OF OFFICE. The term of office of each class of
directors shall be two (2) years (so that the terms of one class of directors
shall expire each year), and the directors shall hold office for the respective
terms to which elected and until their respective successors are elected and
qualified, subject only to prior resignation, death or removal from office.
Notwithstanding any other provision of these Regulations, no director shall be
subject to removal except for cause and by the affirmative vote of the holders
of shares entitling them to exercise at least sixty percent (60%) of the voting
power of the shares of the Corporation, or of any class or classes of shares, as
the case may be.

SECTION 4.5 PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 4.5 - TENURE OF OFFICE. The term of office of each
class of directors shall be two (2) years, (so that the terms of one
class of directors shall expire each year), and the directors shall
hold office for the respective terms to which elected and until their
respective successors are elected and qualified, subject only to prior
resignation, death or removal from office. Directors shall be subject
to removal as provided by statute or by other lawful procedures and
nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the removal of any or all
directors in accordance therewith.

C-1

<PAGE> 28

EXHIBIT D

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS

PROPOSAL 6 -- TO AMEND SECTIONS 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 AND 3.10 OF THE COMPANY'S AMENDED
AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 3.1 - ANNUAL MEETING. The annual meeting of shareholders shall
be held at such time and on such date after the annual financial statements of
the Corporation have been prepared as may be fixed by the Board of Directors and
stated in the notice of the meeting, for the election of directors, the
consideration of reports to be laid before such meeting and the transaction of
such other business as may properly come before the meeting. To properly come
before the meeting, business must be (i) specified in the notice of meeting (or
in any supplement to that notice) given in accordance with Section 3.4 of these
Regulations; (ii) brought before the meeting by the chairman of the meeting or
by or at the direction of the Board of Directors; or (iii) properly requested by
a shareholder to be brought before a meeting in accordance with Section 3.3 of
these Regulations. Upon due notice given in accordance with Section 3.2 of these
Regulations, there may also be considered and acted upon at an annual meeting
any matter which could be properly come before a special meeting, in which case
and for which purpose the annual meeting also shall be considered as, and shall
be, a special meeting. In the event that the annual meeting is not held or if
directors are not elected thereat, a special meeting may be called and held for
that purpose. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, the Board of Directors, by
the affirmative vote or consent of a majority of the directors, may postpone any
annual meeting as to which a date and time therefor has been fixed, at any time
prior to the calling of such meeting to order.

SECTION 3.1 PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 3.2 - SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings of the shareholders
shall be called upon the written request of the chairman of the board, the
president, a majority of the directors either by action at a meeting or acting
without a meeting, or the holders of shares entitling them to exercise fifty
percent (50%) of the voting power of the Corporation entitled to vote thereat.
Calls for any such meeting shall specify the purpose or purposes thereof. No
business shall be considered at any special meeting other than that as may
properly come before the meeting. To properly come before the meeting, business
must be (i) specified in the call for such meeting, or (ii) brought before the
meeting by the chairman of the meeting or by or at the direction of the Board of
Directors.

SECTION 3.2 PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 3.2 - SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings of the
shareholders shall be called upon the written request of the chairman
of the board, the president, the directors by action at a meeting, a
majority of the directors acting without a meeting, or the holders of
shares entitling them to exercise more

D-1

<PAGE> 29

than fifty percent (50%) of the voting power of the Corporation
entitled to vote thereat. Calls for such meetings shall specify the
purpose or purposes of the thereof. No business other than that
specified in the call shall be considered at any special meeting.

SECTION 3.3 - SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS. For business to be properly
requested by a shareholder to be brought before an annual meeting of
shareholders, the shareholder must (i) be a shareholder of the Corporation of
record at the time of the giving of the notice for the annual meeting and at the
time of the annual meeting, (ii) be entitled to vote at the annual meeting, and
(iii) have given timely written notice of the business to the secretary. To be
timely, such notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal
executive offices of the Company not less than sixty (60) days prior to the
annual meeting. Such notice must set forth, as to each matter the shareholder
proposes to bring before the annual meeting: (a) a description in reasonable
detail of the business proposed to be brought before the meeting; (b) the name
and address of the shareholder proposing such business, as they appear upon the
records of the Corporation, and of the beneficial owner on whose behalf the
proposal is made, if any; (c) the number of shares owned of record by the
shareholder proposing such business and beneficially by the beneficial owner on
whose behalf the proposal is made, if any; and (d) any material interest of such
shareholder or beneficial owner in the business proposed to be brought before
the meeting. While the Corporation is subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, no proposal,
resolution, amendment to any proposal or resolution, or nomination, other than
procedural matters relating to the conduct of the meeting, shall be considered
at a meeting of the shareholders (including any adjournments thereof) unless the
matter has been set forth in a proxy statement or information statement
furnished to the shareholders in connection with the meeting in compliance with
the requirements of Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the rules, regulations and schedules promulgated thereunder.
Nothing in this Section 3.3 shall be deemed to affect any rights that any
shareholder may have pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or any successor provision thereto, to request the inclusion
of proposals in the Company's proxy statement.

SECTION 3.3 PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 3.3 - SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS. While the Corporation is
subject to the reporting requirements of Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, no proposal, resolution, amendment to
any proposal or resolution, or nomination, other than procedural
matters relating to the conduct of the meeting, shall be considered at
a meeting of the shareholders (including any adjournments) unless the
matter has been set forth in a proxy statement or information statement
furnished to the shareholders in connection with the meeting in
compliance with the requirements of Section 14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules, regulations and
schedules promulgated thereunder.

SECTION 3.10 - ORDER AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS. The order of business at
all meetings of the shareholders shall be as determined by the chairman of the
meeting. The chairman of the meeting shall have the authority to regulate the
conduct of the meeting, including (i) limiting the persons, other than
shareholders of record and their duly appointed proxies, who may attend the
meeting; (ii) determining whether any shareholder of record or his or her proxy,
or any other person, should be excluded from the meeting because such
shareholder, proxy or other person has disrupted or is likely to disrupt the
meeting; (iii) determining the circumstances under which any person may make a
statement or ask questions at the meeting, and (iv) establishing such other
procedures as the presiding officer may deem appropriate for the orderly conduct
of the meeting. The chairman of the meeting shall have the authority to adjourn
the meeting of the shareholders to a later time, whether or not a quorum is then
present at such meeting. As to each item of business proposed to be brought
before an annual or special meeting of the shareholders, the chairman of the
meeting shall determine whether such business may properly come before the
meeting in accordance with Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of these Regulations. If the
chairman of the meeting determines that any business may not properly come
before the meeting, he or she will so declare to the meeting, and the business
will not be considered or acted upon.

D-2

<PAGE> 30

SECTION 3.10 PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 3.10 - ORDER OF BUSINESS. The order of business at all
meetings of the shareholders shall be as determined by the chairman of
the meeting.

D-3

<PAGE> 31

Exhibit E

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS

PROPOSAL 7 -- TO AMEND ARTICLE XI OF THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF
REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE XI

Amendments

Except as otherwise provided in the Corporation's Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation (as amended from time to time), these Regulations of
the Corporation (as amended from time to time) may be amended or added to by the
affirmative vote or the written consent of the shareholders of record entitled
to exercise a majority of the voting power on such proposal. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, pursuant to Article Seventh of the Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation of the Corporation, the affirmative vote or consent of the holders
of at least sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of the shares of the
Corporation, or of any class or classes of shares, shall be necessary to effect
any amendment, alteration or repeal, whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise, of any of the following provisions of this Code of Regulations of the
Corporation (and as it may otherwise be amended from time to time):

(i) Sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.10 of these Regulations, relating
to annual meetings of the shareholders, special meetings of
the shareholders, the consideration of shareholder proposals
at meetings of the shareholders, and the conduct of business
at meetings of the shareholders, respectively;

(ii) Sections 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 of these Regulations, relating
to the number of directors, the classification of the Board of
Directors, the election of directors, and the tenure of office
of directors, respectively;

(iii) Article VI of these Regulations, relating to the
indemnification of directors and officers of the Corporation;
and

(iv) this Article XI of these Regulations, relating to the
amendment of these Regulations.

In any instance where an amendment or addition is adopted by written consent
without a meeting of the shareholders, it shall be the duty of the secretary to
enter the amendment or addition in the records of the Corporation, and to mail a
copy of such amendment or addition to each shareholder of record who would be
entitled to vote thereon and did not participate in the adoption thereof.

ARTICLE XI PRESENTLY READS AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE XI

Amendments

Except as otherwise provided in the Corporation's Articles of
Incorporation (and as they may be amended from time to time), these
Regulations of the Corporation (and as it may be amended from time to
time) may be amended or added to by the affirmative vote or the written
consent of the shareholders of record entitled to exercise a majority
of the voting power of such proposal; provided, however, that if an
amendment or addition is adopted by written consent without a meeting
of the shareholders, it shall be the duty of the secretary to enter the
amendment or addition in the records of the Corporation, and to mail a
copy of such amendment or addition to each shareholder of record who
would be entitled to vote thereon and did not participate in the
adoption thereof.

<PAGE> 32

PROXY CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING, JULY 22, 1998

The undersigned, having received the Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement,
hereby constitutes and appoints Joseph W. Rog, David H. Kroon, and Barry W.
Schadeck, and each of them (with full power of substitution respectively), true
and lawful attorneys and proxies for the undersigned to attend the Annual
Meeting to be held on July 22, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., at Medina Country Club, 5588
Wedgewood Road, Medina, Ohio, and any adjournments thereof.

The Proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed; if no
direction is made this Proxy will be voted FOR the Director Nominees, FOR
Proposal 2 (approval of an amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation
to increase the number of authorized Common Shares from 12,000,000 to
40,000,000), FOR Proposal 3 (approval of Amendment No. 1 to the 1997 Long-Term
Incentive Plan of Corrpro Companies, Inc.), FOR Proposal 4 (approval of an
amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations to permit shareholders to
establish the size of the Board of Directors), FOR Proposal 5 (approval of an
amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations to limit the removal of directors
to "for cause" grounds), FOR Proposal 6 (approval of an amendment to the
Company's Code of Regulations to establish certain procedures for the proposal
and conduct of business at shareholders' meetings), and FOR Proposal 7 (approval
of an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations to amend the provisions for
amending the Code of Regulations). In their discretion, the parties are also
authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the
meeting.

1. Election of Directors, Nominees:

[ ] FOR all nominees listed below
(except as marked to the contrary below)

[ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
to vote for the nominees listed below

WARREN F. RODGERS, BARRY W. SCHADECK AND WALTER W. WILLIAMS

(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write
that nominee's name on the space provided below.)

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Proposal to approve an amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation
to increase the number of authorized Common Shares from 12,000,000 to
40,000,000 [ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

3. Proposal to approve Amendment No. 1 to the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan of
Corrpro Companies, Inc. [ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

4. Proposal to approve an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations to
permit shareholders to establish the size of the Board of Directors
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

(Continued on the reverse side)

(Continued from other side)

5. Proposal to approve an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations to
limit the removal of directors to "for cause" grounds
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

6. Proposal to approve an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations to
establish certain procedures for the proposal and conduct of business at
shareholders' meetings [ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

7. Proposal to approve an amendment to the Company's Code of Regulations to
amend the provisions for amending the Code of Regulations
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICE BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES, SEE
REVERSE SIDE, BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS. YOUR SHARES CANNOT BE VOTED UNLESS
YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD.

Dated:___________________________, 1998

---------------------------------------
Signature(s)

Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee, or guardian,
please give full title as such.

[ ] ATTEND MEETING

We would appreciate your indicating if
you are planning to attend the Annual
Meeting. Your failure to check this box
will not prejudice you from attending
the meeting.