<PAGE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K405
(MARK ONE)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 27, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition period from ________ to ________
Commission File Number: 0-22068
Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter:
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS,
INCORPORATED
STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF IRS EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION: IDENTIFICATION NO.
Delaware 33-0128224
ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES:
9750 Goethe Road, Sacramento, California 95827
TELEPHONE NO.:
(916) 855-5000
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
Common Stock,
$.001 par value per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by
nonaffiliates as of March 1, 1999, was $1,369,627,018.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's only class of common
stock as of March 1, 1999, was 38,992,734 shares of common stock, $.001 par
value per share.
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Level One Communications, Incorporated ("Level One" or "the Company")
was incorporated in 1985 under the laws of the state of California and was
reincorporated in December 1998 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The
Company has operations in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Level One Communications provides silicon connectivity, Local Area
Network ("LAN") switching and Wide Area Network ("WAN") access solutions for
high-speed telecom and networking applications. These components are critical
elements in today's telecommunication and data communication networks and are
the key building blocks for the Intranets and Internets of the future. Level
One combines its strengths in analog and digital circuit design with its
communications systems expertise, to produce digital and mixed-signal
solutions with increased functionality and greater reliability, resulting in
lower total systems cost. Level One is ISO 9001 registered, illustrating the
company's commitment to world-class standards and providing high quality
products.
Level One's Application Specific Standard Products ("ASSP") provide a
variety of different functions required in communications systems. Historically,
Level One has used its expertise in mixed signal design to develop circuits that
transmit, regenerate, and receive digitized voice, data, and video signals using
a wide variety of protocols. Because these products both transmit and receive
signals, they are typically called "transceivers". All networks, LAN, WAN, and
telephone transmission systems require transceivers. The Company has also begun
to focus on technologies that offer functionality at levels higher than the
transceiver. Switching, routing, and Internet Protocol ("IP") processing for LAN
and WAN applications are high growth areas in the communications market and
represent a significant opportunity for Level One, especially given its
capabilities in the physical layer transceiver area. In addition, the Company's
proprietary simulation software and sophisticated design and testing methodology
accelerate the product design cycle to improve time to market.
A key challenge for Level One's OEM customers and their end users is the
creation of access technologies that maximize the use of the large installed
base of twisted-pair copper telephone lines to transport information. With more
than 1.3 billion miles of copper wire in place in the United States alone,
copper telephone wire is expected to remain the primary medium for local
connectivity to the "electronic superhighway" transport media that handle
long-distance data transmissions. Such long-distance transport media include
copper telephone lines, coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, wireless and satellite
transmission. Copper telephone wire, which was originally designed to transmit
relatively slow analog voice signals, requires special signal conditioning
circuits to enable transmission of high-speed digital signals.
PRODUCTS AND APPLICATIONS
Level One develops and sells advanced ASSPs and custom derivatives that
provide silicon connectivity solutions and achieve improved integration of
functions. The Company's current products address the needs of two primary
aspects of the communications connectivity market: the networking market and the
telecom market.
2
<PAGE>
NETWORKING PRODUCTS
Level One's networking products address the rapid evolution of the LAN
networking connectivity markets. For these markets, Level One produces Ethernet
and Fast Ethernet transceivers, single chip quad repeaters, managed repeaters,
switches, and integrated transceiver solutions.
Local Area Networks address the need to share information among individuals
and workgroups within a building or campus environment. The dominant networking
standard in the LAN environment is Ethernet, commonly implemented over a twisted
pair copper wire environment utilizing a 10 megabits per second transmission
standard. Fast Ethernet products enable transmissions of up to 100 megabits per
second over twisted pair copper wiring. Emerging 1-Gigabit per second Ethernet
standards are aimed at the same copper infrastructure as the Fast Ethernet
products. These high speed LANs are expected to be catalysts for a variety of
new graphics, video, multimedia, and network management applications.
The Company's transceivers incorporate analog and digital functions into
single chip solutions. Level One products in this category are used in
computer/workstation, server, portable computing, network printing, and Ethernet
switch applications. To provide customers with cost effective, high performance
intranet and LAN solutions, the Company's transceivers incorporate features such
as patented on-chip transmit filters, full duplex support, multichannels, 3.3
volt performance, and the smallest form factor package available.
Level One repeater and network management products include cascadeable quad
repeater hub chips, with integrated, filter technology. These chips allow
development of low cost, multiport managed and unmanaged Ethernet repeater hub
systems. The Company also produces a family of remote network management devices
which incorporate a Media Access Controller and support for Simple Network
Management Protocol ("SNMP") and Remote Monitoring ("RMON"). The Company also
has a single chip solution optimized for hybrid switching systems. During 1998,
the Company introduced the LXT974 Fast Ethernet 10/100 transceiver as well as
the LXT 980 family of integrated repeater devices. In total, Level One shipped
in excess of 30 million Ethernet ports in 1998 for both switch and repeater
applications.
As the LAN market continues to experience broad based growth, there is
increased demand for compatible protocols and standards to allow LAN/WAN
interoperability and management. The Company's acquisition of Acclaim
Communications, Inc. in 1998 gave it access to layer 3 and layer 4 switching
and routing technologies which are expected to be incorporated into silicon
solutions providing higher aggregate bandwidth as well as better management
and quality of service. These same capabilities should also allow Level One
to drive the convergence of the LAN and the WAN by providing cost effective
silicon solutions to its OEM's. Finally, the acquisition of Jato
Technologies, Inc. in 1998 brought cost effective IP processing capabilities
to Level One, which will be a key enabler for advancing the capabilities of
the LAN and the WAN. The first application of this technology is a
multi-speed Ethernet controller for server and workstation applications that
is expected to enable gigabit speeds in the enterprise.
TELECOM PRODUCTS
The Company's telecom products service the growing demand for high-speed
digital signal transmission utilizing the industry-wide specifications
referred to as "T1" in North America and "E1" in
3
<PAGE>
Europe, Asia and much of the rest of the world. T1 systems transmit 1.544
million bits per second and E1 systems transmit 2.048 million bits per
second. Level One's products also address the transmission service known as
"Fractional T1," in which users can access multiple 64kbs sub-channel rates
of T1.
Level One produces fully integrated single chip T1 and E1 transceivers to
meet the requirements of its customers. Short-haul transceivers, which process
signals travelling within buildings, are incorporated into customer premise
equipment and into products sold to network service providers such as telephone
companies. Short-haul transceivers are typically used for transmissions of 600
feet to 700 feet. Long-haul transceivers, which transmit to approximately 6,000
feet, are incorporated into products such as PBXs, channel service units,
routers and multiplexers, which provide connectivity between customer premise
devices and the telephone company network. Long-haul transceivers are also used
in base stations for mobile communication systems.
The Company produces fully integrated T1/E1 quad receivers, which are
incorporated into telephone company maintenance and performance monitoring
equipment. Level One's LXT360, LXT361, LXT350 and LXT351 integrated T1/E1
transceivers are aimed at developers of Sonet/SDH multiplexers, digital loop
carriers, and residential broadband access systems. These products permit OEM
customers to develop a single board design that meets both T1 and E1 standards.
The chips are designed to operate over poor quality or "noisy" lines.
Clock rate adapters (CLADs) adapt signals generated at the host system's
internal clock rates for T1/E1 transmission. CLADs are used to generate internal
timing systems for channel banks, digital loop carriers, multiplexers, timing
generators and other T1/E1 equipment, eliminating the need for expensive
discrete crystal oscillators.
Repeaters are installed along telephone company transmission lines to
receive and regenerate signals at intervals of 6,000 feet, preventing the
deterioration of the signal. To reduce service costs, telephone companies use
"smart" repeaters that enable the system operator to quickly locate a faulty
repeater. Level One's products are used in these "smart" repeater applications.
Intranets and WANs connect individuals and workgroups over longer distances
than LANs, using telephone company transmission lines rather than intraoffice
wiring. WAN system products that incorporate Level One devices include routers,
digital modems, multichannel Access Multiplexers, lottery and point-of-sale
terminals. The rapid growth of high bandwidth, low cost digital access services
has increased the demand for business and consumer use of WANs. Along with the
growth of the Internet and on-line services, WAN equipment markets have
experienced significant growth in recent years.
The Company's transceivers targeted at WAN equipment segments incorporate
analog and digital functions into single chip solutions. Level One products are
used in routers, digital modems, and a variety of other customer premise
equipment applications. Service offerings such as Frame Relay, Switched 56, and
DDS have helped drive demand for Level One's products such as the LXT441, a
single chip 56kbs digital access modem.
High-bit-rate digital subscriber line ("HDSL") products produced by the
Company are designed to transmit up to 12,000 feet at the T1 rate on two sets of
twisted-pair copper wire or at the E1 rate on two or three sets of twisted pair
wire, reducing or eliminating the need for repeaters in long-haul T1/E1
transmission. HDSL permits the transmission of data at 784 kilobits per second
or 1,168 kilobits per second on any twisted-pair copper wire used for subscriber
loops. The Company's HDSL solution is a two-chip chipset.
4
<PAGE>
The Company expects that HDSL, together with successor and derivative
technologies, will continue to play an important role in the communications
infrastructure. Emerging DSL technologies ("xDSL") include high speed
Internet access and residential broadband. The Company plans to address these
markets with current and future DSL products. The Company shipped Subrate
HDSL or Multi-Rate Digital Subscriber Line ("MDSL") chipsets to selected
customers in 1996 and formally announced the product in February 1997. MDSL
is currently used for Internet access and digital pair gain, primarily for
commercial customers. In the future, MDSL is expected to also be used for
wireless base stations and video conferencing.
In 1998, the Company played a key role in the development of the next
generation HDSL standard called HDSL2. HDSL2 is similar to HDSL from a
functional standpoint, but has the advantage of using a single pair of copper
wires rather than two pairs for HDSL. This technology will allow the deployment
of T1 services in a manner that is twice as efficient from a cabling standpoint,
allowing service providers to gain more efficient use of their network. Finally,
the Company believes that HDSL2 technology, given its symmetric nature and
quality of service, could be an optimal technology to deliver high bandwidth
services for business access.
Level One believes that as the Internet becomes even more ubiquitous, there
will be new bottlenecks that arise within the WAN. Broadband technologies such
as Sonet and SDH will be more broadly deployed in the WAN to relieve these
bottlenecks, and could represent a significant opportunity for the Company. In
1998, Level One introduced its first broadband products, the LXT6051 and LXT6251
to support this growing need.
TECHNOLOGY
The Company's proprietary technology includes systems simulation, testing
software and an extensive circuit cell library. Level One believes that a key
competitive factor in its success is its ability to use this technology, in
conjunction with industry standard design tools, to rapidly design and introduce
new products. The Company continuously reviews new opportunities in emerging
technologies such as xDSL, Switched Ethernet, Fast and Gigabit Ethernet,
infrared, ATM, wireless, frame relay and cable transmission.
STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS
Level One's relationships and strategic development arrangements with
industry leaders help the Company identify and develop new products that meet
industry needs. Through the involvement of key customers in alpha stage
development, the Company's objective is to bring to market products that are
positioned to become market leaders. Level One is an active member of several
important standards committees throughout the world.
During 1998, the Company and its strategic partners were instrumental in
the development of the standards for two new technologies: HDSL2, which is
repeaterless T1 transmission on a single pair of copper wires, and Gigabit
Ethernet on copper wire for the networking market. Both standards have received
preliminary approval by their respective standards bodies.
Level One has from time to time entered into investment, development or
license agreements with third parties to broaden the Company's product and
technology offerings. Level One has also in the past entered into strategic
alliances with consortia of industry leaders to develop communications products,
such
5
<PAGE>
as the Company's HDSL chipsets. The Company may in the future enter into such
arrangements when appropriate opportunities arise.
SALES AND MARKETING
Level One's sales and marketing strategy is to achieve design wins by
developing products with superior digital and mixed-signal processing functions
that are designed into equipment offered by industry leaders. Level One has a
direct sales force and a worldwide network of independent distributors and sales
representatives. These independent sales organizations are selected for their
ability to provide effective field sales and technical support to customers.
The Company maintains six regional sales offices in the United States. In
addition, there are 26 sales representatives or distributors of the Company's
products. Internationally, Level One has seven sales offices along with 29 sales
representatives operating in 46 countries.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company believes that the continued introduction of new products in
its target markets is essential to its growth. As of December 27, 1998, Level
One had 271 full-time employees engaged in research and development. The
Company currently anticipates that it will increase research and development
staffing levels in 1999. Expenditures for research and development in 1998,
1997, and 1996 were approximately $55.5 million, $37.8 million, and $24.4
million, respectively. These expenditures exclude one-time charges for
research and development relating to acquisitions in 1996 of $2.5 million.
The Company released eleven new products during 1998, consisting of six
networking products and five telecom products. A portion of the Company's
research and development resources may be used to enhance existing products and
to move to smaller geometries on larger wafers to improve product costs.
MANUFACTURING
Level One uses independent silicon foundries to fabricate its wafers.
This approach enables the Company to concentrate its resources on design and
testing, allowing it to eliminate the cost associated with owning and
operating a fabrication facility.
The Company's primary wafer needs are supplied by six foundries; however,
the Company may, from time to time, qualify other foundries. Except where the
Company has contracted for long-term wafer supplies, the Company's suppliers
generally are not obligated to supply, nor is the Company obligated to purchase,
any minimum amount of wafers. Such suppliers generally agree on production
schedules based on purchase orders and forecasts. During 1995, the Company
entered into five-year agreements with three of its suppliers for committed
foundry capacity in consideration of equipment financing or cash deposits. There
are no additional deposits due under the Company's existing foundry agreements.
During the first quarter of 1999, the Company received deposit refunds of $15.0
million on its wafer capacity agreements.
From time to time foundries supplying the Company may experience wafer
yield problems or capacity constraints which can result in wafer delivery
delays. Should such delays occur, the Company may need to locate an
alternative source of supply for wafers. In the past, the Company has
experienced increased costs and delays in customer shipments as a result of a
foundry reducing shipments to the Company without prior notice, forcing the
Company to transfer products to a new foundry. Although the Company believes
it can
6
<PAGE>
meet customer demand, there can be no assurances that unforeseen demand or
supply disruptions will not have a material adverse impact on the Company's
business.
Once the subcontracted wafers have been tested and accepted by the Company,
the die are assembled into packages by subcontractors located worldwide. The
Company utilizes multiple assembly subcontractors for its products. While the
Company has not experienced any material disruption in supply from assembly
subcontractors, there can be no assurance that assembly problems will not occur.
The Company qualifies each assembly and foundry subcontractor before that
vendor manufactures products for the Company. Such qualification includes an
audit and analysis of the subcontractor's quality system and manufacturing
capabilities. The Company continuously monitors subcontractors' quality and
reliability on an ongoing basis. Level One's objective is to control the quality
of finished goods as thoroughly as if it internally operated every step of the
manufacturing process. The Company and its customers thereby realize the
economic efficiencies of "fabless" production combined with tight quality
control.
Effective January 30, 1997, Level One was registered by Underwriters
Laboratory as complying with the requirements of ISO 9001.
BACKLOG
As of December 27, 1998, the Company's total backlog scheduled to be
shipped was approximately $99.9 million, as compared to backlog of approximately
$70.9 million at December 28, 1997. A portion of the orders constituting the
Company's backlog are subject to changes in delivery schedules or to
cancellation at the option of the purchaser without significant penalty. The
Company limits its reported backlog to those orders expected to ship within the
next six months.
COMPETITION
The Company's competition consists of semiconductor companies and
semiconductor divisions of vertically integrated companies. The Company's
principal competitors are Connexent (formerly, a division of Rockwell
International, Inc.), Crystal Semiconductor, Inc. (a subsidiary of Cirrus Logic,
Inc.), Dallas Semiconductor, Inc., Lucent Technologies Inc., PMC-Sierra Inc.,
Siemens A.G., Broadcom Corporation, Integrated Circuit Systems, Inc., Micro
Linear Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Quality Semiconductor,
Inc., Seeq Technologies, Inc. and Texas Instruments, Inc.
Level One believes that its competitive strengths include efficient
distribution channels, highly experienced digital and mixed-signal circuit
designers, proprietary design and development tools, and its library of analog
and digital blocks and cells.
The ability of the Company to compete successfully in the rapidly evolving
area of high performance integrated circuit technology depends on factors both
within and outside of its control. Such factors include, without limitation,
success in designing and manufacturing new products, implementing new
technologies, intellectual property programs, product quality, reliability,
price, efficiency of production, and general economic conditions. Although the
Company believes that it competes favorably, there is no assurance that the
Company will be able to compete successfully in the future.
7
<PAGE>
PATENTS AND LICENSES
Level One has 33 United States patents that expire from 2009 to 2017, 28
pending U.S. patent applications, 16 pending international patent applications,
and 10 issued international patents. All of Level One's products are covered by
at least one Level One patent. The Company has 30 U.S. mask work registrations
on its products. Level One owns seven registered trademarks or servicemarks. On
September, 25, 1998, the Company settled a patent infringement suit against one
of its competitors relating to two of the Company's patents. See "Legal
Proceedings".
Level One has entered into various license agreements for product or
technology exchanges. In general, these licenses are to provide second sources
for standard products or to convey or receive rights to certain proprietary or
patented cores, cells or other technology.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 27, 1998, the Company had 821 employees. The Company's
employees are not represented by any collective bargaining agreement, and the
Company has never experienced a work stoppage. The Company believes its employee
relations are good.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On March 4, 1999, the Company and Intel Corporation entered into a
definitive stock-for-stock merger agreement valued at approximately $2.2
billion under which Intel would acquire Level One. The acquisition is aimed
at providing advanced networking capabilities through increased bandwidth and
functionality through silicon integration. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under Part II,
Item 7 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding this proposed
transaction.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company's principal facilities are in four separately leased
buildings in an office park in Sacramento, California. The four leases relate
to buildings with 86,940 square feet, 24,100 square feet, 51,635 square feet
and 139,809 square feet, respectively. The leases are scheduled to expire in
2008, 2013, 2006 and 2013, respectively.
The Company also leases office facilities for the operation of its
design centers in San Francisco, California, San Jose, California, Austin,
Texas and Morganville, New Jersey of approximately 11,835 square feet, 32,000
square feet, 12,563 square feet and 6,815 square feet, respectively. The
leases are scheduled to expire in 2001, 1999, 2000, and 2003, respectively.
The Company also leases small office facilities for its domestic and
international sales offices.
The Company believes these facilities are adequate for its current and
immediately foreseeable level of operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On February 12, 1999, the Company and Zekko Corp. ("Zekko"), an entity
in which the Company has made an equity investment, jointly filed a complaint
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
against Vision Tek, L.P. ("Vision Tek") and certain of its principals
alleging claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty and seeking a judgment
declaring the respective rights and obligations of Zekko under an Option and
License Agreement, dated as of October 8, 1997, entered into between Zekko,
Vision Tek and certain of Vision Tek's principals (the "Option and License
Agreement"). On February 16, 1999, Vision Tek filed an action against the
Company and Zekko in the District Court for the City and County of Denver,
Colorado seeking a declaratory judgment that neither Zekko nor the Company
has any rights to the technology licensed to Zekko under the Option and
License Agreement.
There are no other material pending legal proceedings, other than routine
litigation incidental to the Company's business, to which the Company is a party
or of which any of its property is the subject.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of the 1998 fiscal year
to a vote of security holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
8
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The Company's Common Stock has been traded on the NASDAQ National Market
System under the symbol LEVL since its initial public offering on August 19,
1993 at $5 1/8 per share (rounded to the nearest 1/16). The following table sets
forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low closing sale prices
of the Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ National Market System (rounded to the
nearest 1/64). The Company's fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest to the
calendar year end in each year.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERIOD HIGH LOW
- ------------------------------------------ -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
1998
Fourth Quarter 36 1/5 16 3/8
Third Quarter 30 1/16 17 7/16
Second Quarter 32 7/8 20
First Quarter 29 61/64 18 29/64
1997
Fourth Quarter 31 21/64 17 1/4
Third Quarter 26 1/4 16 21/64
Second Quarter 17 25/32 9 25/32
First Quarter 16 21/64 12 43/64
</TABLE>
In July 1997, the Board of Directors authorized a 3-for-2 stock split,
which was effective on August 26, 1997. On February 23, 1998, the Company
announced that it had approved a 3-for-2 stock split effective March 30, 1998,
to shareholders of record on March 9, 1998. All common stock amounts and per
share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the stock split.
On March 1, 1999, the closing sale price for the Company's Common Stock
was $35 1/8 per share. As of March 1, 1999, there were approximately 396
holders of record of the Company's Common Stock. On March 5, 1999, the day
after the public announcement of the definitive merger agreement between the
Company and Intel Corporation, the closing sale price for the Company's
Common Stock was $45 per share.
The Company has never paid dividends on its Common Stock and does not
anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company intends
to retain its earnings for the operation of its business.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
On November 24, 1998, the Company completed a stock-for-stock merger
with Jato Technologies, Inc. ("Jato"), a provider of high performance,
multi-speed Gigabit Ethernet controller technology. In connection with the
merger, the Company issued 2,551,152 shares of its common stock and assumed
486,088 stock options in exchange for all the outstanding stock and options
of Jato. The shares of common stock issued in exchange for the Jato shares
and upon exercise of the assumed Jato options were exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof, as no public offering or
public solicitation was used in connection with the issuance of such shares.
On July 6, 1998, the Company completed a stock-for-stock merger with
Acclaim Communications, Inc. ("Acclaim"), a provider of Fast Ethernet and
Gigabit Ethernet switches and integrated Multi-Service access products. In
connection with the merger, the Company issued 3,961,374 shares of its common
stock and assumed 780,278 stock options and 256,485 warrants in exchange for
all the outstanding stock, options and warrants of Acclaim. The shares of
common stock issued in exchange for the Acclaim shares and upon exercise of
the assumed Acclaim options and warrants were exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof, as no
public offering or public solicitation was used in connection with the
issuance of such shares.
9
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF FISCAL YEAR END
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents $28,794 $27,694 $23,301 $22,504 $ 9,260
Working capital 140,101 158,739 51,178 51,287 48,231
Total assets 326,290 283,762 115,732 101,834 71,628
Long-term obligations (less current portion) 116,681 117,474 3,829 4,463 361
Shareholders' equity 163,192 118,302 96,374 79,558 63,309
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA
Revenues $ 262,988 $ 156,500 $ 111,987 $ 78,018 $ 46,825
Cost of sales 109,656 65,583 48,477 33,300 18,785
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Gross margin 153,332 90,917 63,510 44,718 28,040
Operating expenses:
Research and development (1) 55,459 37,757 26,923 17,963 9,956
Sales and marketing 39,504 26,532 17,154 11,414 6,772
General and administrative (2) 22,113 12,507 7,487 5,839 3,424
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total operating expenses 117,076 76,796 51,564 35,216 20,152
Operating income 36,256 14,121 11,946 9,502 7,888
Net interest and other income (3) 3,311 1,882 2,261 2,071 1,440
Provision for income taxes (4) 16,652 9,450 6,374 1,442 1,323
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net income $ 22,915 $ 6,553 $ 7,833 $ 10,131 $ 8,005
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Basic earnings per share $ 0.62 $ 0.19 $ 0.25 $ 0.35 $ 0.31
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.57 $ 0.18 $ 0.24 $ 0.33 $ 0.29
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
</TABLE>
(1) Includes one-time charges for research and development relating to
the acquisitions of Silicon Design Experts, Inc. in 1996 of $2,500,000,
and San Francisco Telecom, Inc., in 1995 of $750,000.
(2) Includes one-time transaction charges of $3.6 million relating to the
acquisitions of Acclaim Communications, Inc. and Jato Technologies,
Inc. in 1998.
(3) A one-time gain of $675,000 relating to the sale of a portion of a
minority interest in Maker Communications, Inc. is included in 1996.
10
<PAGE>
(4) Includes a one time gain for Valuations Reserve adjustment of $2.5
million in 1995.
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL 1998 QUARTERS FISCAL 1997 QUARTERS
-------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
--------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA
Revenues $56,630 $60,496 $66,616 $79,246 $30,138 $32,708 $42,629 $51,025
Cost of sales 23,526 25,890 27,543 32,697 12,900 14,146 17,337 21,200
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Gross margin 33,104 34,606 39,073 46,549 17,238 18,562 25,292 29,825
Operating expenses
Research and development 12,553 12,820 14,850 15,236 7,568 8,285 9,955 11,949
Sales and marketing 9,414 9,492 9,982 10,616 4,604 5,201 7,108 9,619
General and administrative (1) 4,166 7,410 4,578 5,959 2,113 2,688 3,439 4,267
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Total operating expenses 26,133 29,722 29,410 31,811 14,285 16,174 20,502 25,835
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Operating income 6,971 4,884 9,663 14,738 2,953 2,388 4,790 3,990
Net interest and other income 458 820 1,234 799 391 491 682 318
Provision for income taxes 3,700 3,569 4,254 5,129 1,676 1,932 2,660 3,182
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Net income $ 3,729 $2,135 $6,643 $10,408 $1,668 $ 947 $2,812 $ 1,126
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Basic earnings per share $ 0.10 $ 0.06 $ 0.18 $ 0.27 $ 0.05 $ 0.03 $ 0.08 $ 0.03
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.10 $ 0.05 $ 0.16 $ 0.25 $ 0.05 $ 0.03 $ 0.08 $ 0.03
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
--------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
</TABLE>
(1) Includes one-time transaction charges relating to the acquisition of
Acclaim Communications, Inc. and Jato Technologies, Inc. in the second
quarter of 1998 of $2.8 million and in the fourth quarter of 1998 of
$0.8 million, respectively.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. The statements contained in this report that are not purely
historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, including without limitation statements regarding the Company's
expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. All
forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information
available to the Company on the date hereof, and the Company assumes no
obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. The Company's actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements. See "Factors that May Affect Future Results".
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
REVENUES: The Company derives revenues from application specific standard
product ("ASSP") integrated circuits and custom derivatives designed, developed
and marketed for high speed telecom and networking applications. In addition,
the Company has received non-recurring engineering and licensing revenue from
strategic partners and customers in connection with product development
projects. As a
11
<PAGE>
result of those and other transactions, the Company receives royalties and
license fees. Revenues for 1998 increased to $263.0 million from $156.5
million in 1997 and $112.0 million in 1996. The continued growth in revenues
is due to the successful introduction of new products and increased sales of
existing products to customers in the Company's target market segments. In
1998 and 1997, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues. In
1996, sales to Hewlett-Packard Company were 11.2% of total sales.
Export sales, primarily consisting of sales to Canada, Europe, and Asia,
were 40% of revenues in 1998, 35% of revenues in 1997 and 39% in 1996. All sales
were in U.S. dollars, thereby eliminating any foreign currency impact on
revenues and net income. The dollar increase in international sales is
attributable to increased sales to foreign manufacturing facilities and
subcontractors of domestic customers and the Company's increased international
marketing and sales efforts.
ROYALTIES, LICENSES AND NON-RECURRING ENGINEERING REVENUE: The Company has
entered into development agreements with certain customers relating to
customer-specific applications, as well as license agreements with certain
semiconductor manufacturers. Revenue is not recognized for non-recurring
engineering ("NRE") contracts until contract milestones are met, although
expenditures associated with the contract are expensed as incurred. During 1998,
the Company had $77,000 in revenues from NRE contracts versus $56,000 in 1997
and $398,000 in 1996. The Company received $4.0 million from development,
license and royalty agreements in 1998 compared with $1.0 million in 1997 and
$197,000 in 1996.
The Company believes future revenue growth will depend on the success
and timing of new products along with continued sales growth of existing
products. New products are generally incorporated into a customer's product
or system at the design stage. However, design wins may precede volume sales
by six months or more. No assurance can be given that any design win will
result in future revenues. Future revenue growth will also be impacted by the
consummation of the proposed merger with Intel Corporation. See "Subsequent
Events."
GROSS MARGIN: The Company's cost of sales includes the costs of wafer
fabrication and assembly performed by third party suppliers, costs associated
with the procurement, scheduling, and quality assurance functions performed by
the Company and testing performed by either the Company or third party
suppliers. Research and development expenses associated with non-recurring
engineering contracts are expensed as incurred, while the related revenue is
recognized only as contract milestones are completed. The following table sets
forth the Company's product sales and product gross margin.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Product Sales......................... $ 262,988 $ 156,500 $ 111,987
Cost of product sales................. 109,656 65,583 48,477
--------- --------- ---------
Gross margin $ 153,332 $ 90,917 $ 63,510
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Gross margin percentage............... 58.3% 58.1% 56.7%
</TABLE>
Product gross margin is affected by several factors, including selling
prices, the mix between older and newer products, test equipment utilization,
manufacturing yields, timing of cost reductions and the mix between direct and
distributor sales. Margins on domestic and international sales are similar.
Beginning in 1996, certain engineering costs associated with product cost
reduction efforts were more appropriately allocated to cost of product sales
rather than research and development. This caused margins to decline by
12
<PAGE>
approximately 2.0 percentage points in 1996, while reducing research and
development expense a similar amount. This change in cost classification had no
net impact on operating profit.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: Research and development ("R&D") expenses were
$55.5 million in 1998, $37.8 million in 1997 and $26.9 million in 1996. As a
percent of revenues, R&D expenses were 21.1%, 24.1%, and 24.0% in 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively. In 1996, R&D expenses included a one-time charge for
purchased research and development of $2.5 million related to the acquisition of
Silicon Design Experts, Inc. Excluding one time charges, R&D expenses as percent
of revenues was 21.8% for 1996. As previously stated in the gross margin
section, in 1996, the Company began accounting for engineering costs associate
with product cost reduction efforts in cost of product sales, rather than R&D.
SALES AND MARKETING: Sales and marketing expenses were $39.5 million in
1998, $26.5 million in 1997 and $17.2 million in 1996. As a percent of revenue,
sales and marketing expenses were 15.0%, 17.0% and 15.3% in 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The dollar increases in sales and marketing expenses are largely
due to increased sales, sales support and field application engineering
headcount and the associated expense increases. The Company has also increased
its international sales offices and support staff.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE: General and administrative expenses increased
to $22.1 million in 1998 from $12.5 million in 1997 and $7.5 million in 1996. As
a percentage of revenue, expenses were 8.4% in 1998, compared to 8.0% in 1997
and 6.7% in 1996. In 1998, the company incurred one time transaction charges of
$3.6 million associated with the acquisitions of Acclaim Communications, Inc.
and Jato Technologies, Inc.. Excluding these one time charges, general and
administrative expenses as a percent of revenues was 7.0% in 1998. The expense
increases in dollars are primarily attributable to additional headcount and
associated expenses due to the Company's growth.
NET INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME: The Company earns interest on its cash and
investments and incurs interest expense on its convertible subordinated notes
and on capital lease obligations used to finance certain equipment. Net interest
and other income for 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $3.3 million, $1.9 million and $2.3
million, respectively. In 1996, other income included a one-time gain of
$675,000 from the sale of a portion of the Company's investment in Maker
Communications.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES: The Company's effective income tax rate was
42.1% for 1998. In 1997 and 1996, the effective rate was 59.1% and 44.9%. For a
reconciliation of the Company's effective tax rate to the statutory federal tax
rate, see Note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During the years ended 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Company financed its
operations primarily through cash flows from operations and existing cash and
investment balances. During the third quarter of 1997 the Company raised $111.5
million, net of discounts, commissions and expenses from a private placement to
qualified investors of subordinated convertible notes due in 2004 with a 4%
coupon. Working capital as of December 27, 1998, was $140.1 million.
The Company's principal sources of liquidity as of December 27, 1998
consisted of $121.5 million in cash and short-term investments.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $51.9 million in 1998, $14.7
million in 1997 and $21.5 million in 1996. The increase in net inflow of cash
from operating activities in 1998 is due to an
13
<PAGE>
increase in net income of $16.4 million from 1997 and to changes in the
balances of certain current assets and liabilities. In 1998, trade accounts
receivable increased by $5.6 million due to increased sales levels, while
days sales outstanding was reduced to 41 days in 1998 from 54 days in 1997
and 1996. Inventories decreased by $6.2 million to $20.5 million at the end
of 1998 with days of inventory on hand at 57 days at the end of 1998 compared
to 115 days at the end of 1997 and 67 days at the end of 1996.
During 1998, 1997, and 1996, total expenditures for capital equipment were
$29.6 million, $19.4 million, and $10.3 million, respectively. The expenditures
in each year consisted primarily of design and development tools, test equipment
and furniture and fixtures required by the continued growth in the Company.
Included in total capital expenditures for 1996 was $700,000 for equipment
financed by capital leases, no capital leases were incurred in 1998 or 1997.
The Company's current wafer requirements are supplied primarily by six
foundries. During 1995, the Company entered into five-year agreements with three
of its suppliers for committed foundry capacity in consideration of equipment
financing or cash deposits. At December 27, 1998, the Company had provided an
aggregate of $21.9 million in capital equipment financing and/or cash deposits
to these foundries to obtain committed foundry capacity. During the first
quarter of 1999, the Company received $15.0 million in deposit refunds per its
agreements. There are no additional deposits and/or equipment financing due
under the Company's existing foundry agreements.
The Company expects to finance its 1999 capital equipment requirements
using a combination of cash and equipment leasing. The Company believes that its
existing cash resources, combined with cash generated from operations and
equipment lease management will be sufficient to meet the Company's cash
requirements through the end of 1999. However, the Company may from time to time
seek additional equity or debt financing as a result of the capital intensive
nature of the semiconductor industry.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
LEVEL ONE'S RELIANCE ON THIRD PARTIES TO MANUFACTURE, ASSEMBLE AND TEST
ITS PRODUCTS MAY RESULT IN INCREASED COSTS OR DELAYS
Because Level One does not manufacture the silicon wafers used for its
products, Level One depends on its wafer suppliers to produce wafers in
sufficient quantities to meet customer demand at acceptable yields and at
competitive prices. Level One also depends on wafer suppliers to assemble, test
and deliver wafers on time. In 1994 and 1995, Level One's wafer suppliers
reduced shipments without prior notice, which resulted in increased costs and
delays that required Level One to transfer the production of some products to a
new supplier. Supply agreements with wafer suppliers cannot eliminate this risk
since Level One's suppliers may not be able to produce enough wafers to meet
increased demand because of their own capacity limitations.
IN ORDER TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY, LEVEL
ONE NEEDS TO CONTINUALLY DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS THAT GAIN MARKET
ACCEPTANCE
In the semiconductor industry, price competition is intense and product
life cycles are short. As a result, the average selling price for Level One's
products decreases rapidly as new or competing products are introduced. To
compensate, Level One relies on obtaining yield improvements to reduce
manufacturing costs and on introducing new products which incorporate advanced
features that result in higher average selling prices. To the extent that Level
One does not successfully develop and timely introduce new products that achieve
market acceptance, or to the extent that Level One does not achieve sufficient
cost reductions on existing products to maintain margins, Level One may be
adversely impacted. To be successful, Level One must identify new product
opportunities, stay ahead of its competitors so that their products will not
render Level One's products obsolete or noncompetitive, and gain market
acceptance of its products with target customers. Because of the increasing
complexity of Level One's new products, Level One could experience delays in
completing development and introduction of new products that could adversely
impact its anticipated market share for new products. Level One may be adversely
affected by a failure in any of these areas.
LEVEL ONE'S RECENT ACQUISITIONS PLACE A STRAIN ON LEVEL ONE'S
MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES
In July 1998, Level One acquired Acclaim Communications, Inc. In late
November 1998, Level One acquired Jato Technologies, Inc. In order to
successfully integrate these two newly acquired businesses and successfully
manage Level One's existing business, Level One will need to expand and refine
its management and personnel resources. Level One will also need to
significantly increase its development, testing, quality control, marketing,
logistics and service capabilities. If Level One does not effectively expand and
deploy its resources to meet these needs, Level One's business may be adversely
impacted.
14
<PAGE>
ASSERTING AND DEFENDING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY IMPACT LEVEL
ONE'S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REGARDLESS OF SUCCESS
In the semiconductor industry, competitors often assert intellectual
property infringement claims against one another. The success of Level One's
business depends on its ability to successfully defend its intellectual
property. This litigation may have a material impact on Level One's financial
condition regardless of whether or not Level One is successful. There is no
assurance that Level One will be successful in defending or asserting its
intellectual property rights.
EXCESS OR INSUFFICIENT INVENTORIES MAY ADVERSELY IMPACT LEVEL ONE'S
REVENUES AND EARNINGS
If Level One produces excess or insufficient product inventories
because it does not accurately anticipate customer demand, Level One's revenues
and earnings could be materially adversely impacted. This may happen for three
reasons. First, some of Level One's customers place orders with long lead-times
that may be cancelled or rescheduled without significant penalty. Second, Level
One's inventory risk increases during periods of strong demand and/or restricted
semiconductor capacity because, based on Level One's past experience, customers
often over-order to assure adequate supply and then may cancel or postpone
orders without notice or significant penalty if other product becomes available.
Third, component shortages from Level One's customers' suppliers could cause
those customers to cancel or delay plans to incorporate Level One's products
into the design of target products, resulting in the cancellation or delay of
orders for Level One's products.
THE COMPLETION OF LEVEL ONE'S 4% CONVERTIBLE NOTE OFFERING HAS
INCREASED LEVEL ONE'S INTEREST EXPENSE AND MAY LIMIT LEVEL ONE'S
ABILITY TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING FOR WORKING CAPITAL,
ACQUISITIONS OR OTHER PURPOSES
In September 1997, Level One incurred approximately $115 million in
additional debt as a result of its issuance of 4% Convertible Subordinated
Notes due 2004. These notes increased Level One's ratio of long-term debt to
total capitalization from 3.0% at June 29, 1997, to 41.7% at December 27,
1998. This increased leverage has increased Level One's interest expense
substantially. This increased leverage could adversely affect Level One's
ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, acquisitions or
other purposes and could make Level One more vulnerable to economic downturns
and competitive pressures. This increased leverage could also affect Level
One's liquidity, as a substantial portion of available cash from operations
may have to be applied to meet debt service requirements and, in the event of
a cash shortfall, Level One could be forced to reduce other expenditures
and/or forego potential acquisitions to be able to meet such requirements.
15
<PAGE>
THE FAILURE OF LEVEL ONE'S KEY SUPPLIERS TO BE YEAR 2000 COMPLIANT AND
LEVEL ONE'S FAILURE TO DEVELOP YEAR 2000 CONTINGENCY PLANS COULD CAUSE
LEVEL ONE TO EXPERIENCE MANUFACTURING INTERRUPTIONS OR DELAYS THAT
COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT LEVEL ONE'S BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION OR
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Level One is currently in the process of determining whether there are
any critical areas in its business that are not Year 2000 compliant. Level One
has begun a comprehensive project to prepare its computer systems for the Year
2000. Level One presently estimates that the total cost of addressing its Year
2000 problems will be approximately $500,000, of which approximately 5% has been
expended to date. This cost estimate was derived utilizing numerous assumptions,
including the assumption that Level One has already identified its most
significant Year 2000 problems and that the assessment, remediation and
contingency plans of its third party suppliers will be fulfilled in a timely
manner without significant additional cost to Level One. Level One believes that
there is a remote possibility of an adverse impact on its business due to
problems with its internal systems or products. Level One's products have no
date specific functions or date dependencies and will operate according to
published specifications through the Year 2000 and dates into the 21st century.
As part of its Year 2000 assessment, Level One is contacting key suppliers of
products and services to determine whether such suppliers' operations, products
and services are Year 2000 capable and/or to monitor their progress toward Year
2000 compliance. If Level One's suppliers are not Year 2000 compliant, Level One
could experience manufacturing interruptions or shutdowns, decreased yields,
quality inconsistencies, delayed or inaccurate product testing, delivery delays,
or service interruptions. It is possible that one or more of these problems
could have a material adverse effect on Level One's business, financial
condition, or results of operations. There is also a risk because Level One has
not yet fully developed Year 2000 contingency plans to address any failure of
Level One's Year 2000 assessment to identify and remediate significant Year 2000
risks to its business operations. Development of contingency plans is in
progress and will continue during calendar year 1999. Such plans could include
accelerating replacement of affected equipment or software, using back-up
equipment and software, developing temporary manual procedures to compensate for
system deficiencies, and identifying Year 2000 capable suppliers and service
providers. There can be no assurance that any such contingency plans would
adequately address the Year 2000 problem. The failure to develop a successful
contingency plan could result in significant delays and inefficiency in Level
One's business which could have a material adverse effect on Level One's
business, financial condition and results of operations.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 4, 1999, the Company and Intel Corporation entered into a
definitive stock-for-stock merger agreement valued at approximately $2.2
billion under which Intel would acquire Level One. The acquisition is aimed
at providing advanced networking capabilities through increased bandwidth and
functionality through silicon integration. Under the terms of the agreement,
each share of Level One stock would be exchanged for 0.86 shares of Intel
stock, after adjusting for Intel's two-for-one stock split announced in
January 1999 and effective April 11, 1999. Approximately 37.2 million shares
of Intel stock would be issued, assuming the conversion of Level One's
outstanding convertible subordinated notes into Level One common stock when
permissible under their terms. The completion of this transaction is subject
to compliance with regulatory requirements, Level One stockholder approval,
and conditions customary in a transaction of this type.
16
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Company's financial statements included with this Form 10-K are set
forth under Item 14 hereof.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There has been no change of accountants nor any disagreements with
accountants on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial
statement disclosure required to be reported under this Item.
17
<PAGE>
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The executive officers and directors of the Company and their ages as of
March 1, 1999, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION WITH THE COMPANY
---- --- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Robert S. Pepper, Ph.D. 63 President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board of Directors
John Kehoe 53 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary
George A. Papa 50 Vice President, Worldwide Sales
Michael A. Ricci 43 Vice President, Telecom
David T. McKinnon 51 Vice President, Networking
Visveswar Akella 36 Vice President, Internetworking
Michael R. Wodopian 46 Vice President, Business Development and
Strategic Planning
Daniel S. Koellen 41 Vice President, Quality and Reliability
Thomas J. Connors(1)(2) 68 Director
Paul Gray, Ph.D. 55 Director
Martin Jurick (2) 60 Director
Henry Kressel, Ph.D.(2) 64 Director
Joseph P. Landy(1) 36 Director
Kenneth A. Pickar, Ph.D. 59 Director
</TABLE>
(1) Member of the Audit Committee
(2) Member of the Compensation Committee
Dr. Pepper joined the Company in July 1986 as President, Chief Executive
Officer and a director. He became Chairman of the Board of Directors in
January 1993. From 1979 until 1984, Dr. Pepper was Vice President and General
Manager of the Solid State division of RCA Corporation. Prior to joining RCA,
18
<PAGE>
Dr. Pepper had spent over 18 years in the semiconductor industry, including
positions as Vice President and General Manager of the Semiconductor Division
at Analog Devices, Inc.. Dr. Pepper holds B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley.
Mr. Kehoe joined the Company in October 1995 as Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary. In November 1997, Mr. Kehoe was elected
Senior Vice President. Immediately prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kehoe
served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Focus
Surgery, Inc., a medical device manufacturer. From 1992 to 1993 he served as
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer for Celeritek, Inc., a
microwave systems company. From 1989 to 1992 he served as Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Poqet Computer Corp., a computer
manufacturer. Prior to 1989 he worked in various financial and CFO positions
for approximately 14 years with high technology companies, including Texas
Instruments Inc. Mr. Kehoe holds an MBA from Fordham University and a BBA
from Manhattan College.
Mr. Papa joined the Company in February 1997 as Vice President,
Worldwide Sales. Since 1991, he had been employed as Vice President of Sales
for North America by Siemens Components Corporation, a division of Siemens.
Previously Mr. Papa was employed in other management and sales positions with
Siemens Components Corporation, LSI Logic Corporation, Intel Corporation, and
Tektronix. Mr. Papa holds a B.S.E.E. from Northeastern University
Mr. Ricci joined the Company in August 1997 as Vice President, Telecom.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ricci was Director of Wireless
Communication at Advanced Micro Devices ("AMD"). Prior to this role, Mr.
Ricci held the position of Director, Desktop Networking, at AMD. Mr. Ricci
worked at AMD for 17 years. Prior to joining AMD, Mr. Ricci worked at
Siliconix, Inc. in the communications area for two years.
Mr. McKinnon joined the Company in June 1998 as Vice President,
Networking. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McKinnon spent 21 years at
National Semiconductor Corporation ("NSC"), with his most recent position
being Chief Technical Officer and Chief Operating Officer of NSC, Japan.
Previously, he held the positions of Vice President and General Manager of
the Ethernet Division and Director of the Local Area Networks Business Unit.
Mr. Akella joined the Company in July 1998 as Vice President,
Internetworking in connection with the acquisition of Acclaim Communications,
Inc. ("Acclaim"). In addition to founding Acclaim, where he was Chief
Executive Officer and President, Mr. Akella established the Local Area
Networking Products Group at LSI Logic Corporation and was a member of the
founding team of Kalpana. He has also held management roles at S3 Inc., Chips
and Technologies, Inc. and LTX Systems.
Mr. Wodopian joined the Company in January 1998 as Vice President,
Business Development and Strategic Planning. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Wodopian spent over 16 years at Advanced Micro Devices, most recently as
the Director of Marketing for the Communications Products Division. Prior to
that, he spent four years at AMD's European headquarters as Director of
Marketing for Europe. During the balance of his tenure at AMD, he served in a
variety of program management and field applications roles. Prior to working
at AMD, Mr. Wodopian was responsible for microprocessor based system level
designs in the process control and aerospace industries.
Mr. Koellen has been responsible for the Quality and Reliability
function since he joined the Company in January 1989, serving as Manager
until January 1992 and then as Director until January 1993 when he was
promoted to Vice President, Quality and Reliability. From 1985 to 1989, Mr.
Koellen was
19
<PAGE>
Lead Failure Analysis Engineer for the Denver Aerospace Division of Martin
Marietta Corp. Prior to joining Martin Marietta, Mr. Koellen managed the
surface analysis laboratory for Mostek Corporation, a supplier of dynamic
random access memory integrated circuits. Mr. Koellen holds an M.S. in
Engineering and Applied Science from Southern Methodist University and a B.S.
in Applied Mathematics, Engineering and Physics from the University of
Wisconsin.
Mr. Connors has been a director of the Company since April 1991. Since
1980, Mr. Connors has been the principal of TJC Investments, an independent
consulting firm that works with companies in the semiconductor and related
industries. Previously, Mr. Connors was employed by Motorola, Inc., where he
last served as Vice President and General Manager of the Semiconductor
Division. Mr. Connors is also a member of the Board of Directors of
SGS-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of SGS-N.V.
Dr. Gray has been a director since April 1994. Dr. Gray is the Dean of
the College of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr.
Gray served as Chairman of the Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
Department from 1990 to 1993 and as Vice Chairman of the Department from 1988
to 1990. He served as a director of Microlinear Corporation from 1988 to
1991. He has published more than 100 papers in the electrical engineering
field, served on numerous industry committees, and holds 10 patents.
Mr. Jurick has been a director of the Company since April 1991. Since
1984, Mr. Jurick has been a Senior Vice President of Silicon Systems, Inc.
("SSI"), a semiconductor manufacturing company, which until 1996 was a wholly
owned subsidiary of TDK Corporation and in 1996 became a division of Texas
Instruments Inc. Mr. Jurick also serves as a director of Microsemi Corp.
Dr. Kressel has been a director of the Company since August 1987. Since
1985, Dr. Kressel has been a Managing Director at E.M. Warburg, Pincus & Co.,
LLC ("EMW"), an investment firm, where he has been employed since 1983. Prior
to joining EMW, Dr. Kressel spent 20 years at RCA Laboratories, where he
became a Staff Vice President. Dr. Kressel is also a member of the Board of
Directors of IA Corporation, NOVA Corporation, Earth Web, Inc. and Covad
Communications, Inc.
Mr. Landy has been a director of the Company since January 1991. Since
January 1994, Mr. Landy has served as a Managing Director at EMW, where he
has been employed since 1985. Prior to joining EMW, Mr. Landy was employed by
Dean Witter Realty, Inc., the real estate investment banking affiliate of
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., as a financial analyst. He also serves as a
director of NOVA Corporation, Indus International, Inc., and Covad
Communications, Inc.
Dr. Pickar has been a director since June 1998. Dr. Pickar is currently
a Visiting Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the California Institute of
Technology. From 1993 to 1997, he served as Senior Vice President of
Engineering and Technology for Allied Signal Corporation. From 1983 to 1992,
he was Manager of Electronic Systems Research for General Electric
Corporation. Dr. Pickar has held management and engineering positions with
Thomas Consulting Group, Signetics Corporation, Bell Northern Research and
Bell Laboratories. Dr. Pickar has served on a number of University Advisory
Committees including Stanford, Berkeley, Cornell and Illinois. He has served
as Vice Chairman of the Microelectronics and Computer Consortium, on the
Board of Directors of the Semiconductor Research Corporation, and as a
Director of the Albany Medical Center.
Directors are elected by the shareholders at each annual meeting to
serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors
are duly elected and qualified. Officers are elected to
20
<PAGE>
serve, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors, until their
successors are appointed. There are no family relationships between any
directors or executive officers. There are no agreements or other
arrangements or understandings pursuant to which any director of the Company
will be selected as a director or nominee.
Non-employee, non-affiliated Directors of the Company receive $1,800 per
day for each day devoted to Company Board or committee meetings. The Company
reimburses each director for reasonable expenses of attending meetings of the
Board of Directors and any committees thereof. Non-affiliated, non-employee
directors receive an annual automatic option grant of 2,000 shares at the end
of each year. In 1997, Warburg Pincus Capital Co., an affiliate of EMW,
distributed substantially all of its shares of Company stock, and Dr. Kressel
and Mr. Landy each then became entitled to automatic grants of options to
purchase an aggregate of 15,000 shares vesting over five years.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
To the Company's knowledge, based solely on its review of the copies of
reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other
reports were required, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to
its officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were
complied with during the fiscal year ended December 27, 1998.
21
<PAGE>
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by the Company's
Chief Executive Officer and the four other highest paid executive officers
whose compensation for the 1998 fiscal year was in excess of $100,000
(collectively the "Named Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM
----------------------------------------------------- COMPENSATION
SECURITIES
OTHER ANNUAL UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION (1) OPTIONS COMPENSATION
- ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert S. Pepper 1998 386,923 1,173,000 - 170,000 13,029
President, Chief Executive Officer 1997 325,846 580,000 - 585,000 2,794
and Chairman of the Board 1996 296,923 170,000 - 135,000 6,276
John Kehoe
Senior Vice President, Chief 1998 222,885 370,000 - 40,000 8,823
Financial Officer and Secretary 1997 186,056 201,859 - 120,000 1,617
1996 153,182 81,508 - 45,000 1,800
George Papa (3) 1998 211,347 255,240 15,000 - 6,101
Vice President, Worldwide Sales 1997 142,697 142,350 12,500 157,500 4,616
1996 - - - - -
Michael A. Ricci (4) 1998 197,119 175,000 66,081 - 7,204
Vice President, Telecom Business Unit 1997 59,063 43,000 - 112,500 142
1996 - - - - -
Michael R. Wodopian (5) 1998 173,100 192,000 159,148 90,000 3,960
Vice President, Business Development 1997 - - - - -
and Strategic Planning 1996 - - - - -
</TABLE>
(1) Includes allowance for automobile for Mr. Papa and relocation reimbursement
for Mr. Ricci & Mr. Wodopian
(2) All other compensation represents the Company's 401(k) matching and
discretionary contributions.
(3) Mr. Papa's employment began February 10, 1997 at an annual salary of
$175,000.
(4) Mr. Ricci's employment began August 27, 1997 at an annual salary of
$185,000.
(5) Mr. Wodopian's employment began January 2, 1998 at an annual salary of
$180,000.
22
<PAGE>
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of
stock options to each of the Named Officers during the fiscal year ended
December 27, 1998. The options listed were granted under the Company's 1993
Stock Option Plan. In accordance with the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, also shown is the potential realizable value based on
the assumed rates of stock price appreciation of 5% and 10%, compounded
annually, from the date the option was granted over the full option term.
These amounts represent certain assumed rates of appreciation only and do not
represent the Company's estimate of future stock price. Actual gains, if any,
on stock option exercises are dependent on the future performance of the
Common Stock.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants Potential Realizable
----------------------------------------------------------------- Value at Assumed
Annual Rates of
Number of % of Total Stock Price
Securities Options Appreciation for
Underlying Granted to Exercise Option Term (1)
Options Employees in Price Expiration --------------------------------
Name Granted (#) Fiscal Year ($/Share) Date 5% ($) 10% ($)
---- ----------- ----------- --------- ---- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert S. Pepper, Ph.D. 170,000 6.6 16.38 10/8/08 1,750,685 4,436,581
John Kehoe 40,000 1.6 16.38 10/8/08 411,926 1,043,901
Michael R. Wodopian 90,000 3.5 18.46 1/2/08 1,044,749 2,647,600
</TABLE>
(1) There is no assurance provided to any executive officer or any other holder
of the Company's securities that the actual stock price appreciation over
the 4-year or 5-year option term will be at the assumed 5% and 10% levels or
at any other defined level. Unless the market price of the Common Stock
appreciates over the option term, no value will be realized from the option
grants made to the executive officers.
23
<PAGE>
The following table provides information with respect to the Named
Officers concerning the exercise of options during the last fiscal year and
unexercised options held as of December 27, 1998.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST
FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised In-The-Money Options
Shares Options at Fiscal Year End (#) At Fiscal Year End ($)(1)
Acquired Value ------------------------------- --------------------------------
Name On Exercise (#) Realized($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
---- --------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert S. Pepper, Ph.D. 141,500 3,885,946 440,551 766,250 12,370,267 17,973,756
John Kehoe 8,500 153,931 127,250 215,500 3,245,883 5,128,439
George Papa 0 0 31,500 126,000 750,749 3,002,996
Michael R. Wodopian 0 0 0 90,000 0 1,623,753
Mike A. Ricci 0 0 22,500 90,000 313,126 1,252,503
</TABLE>
(1) Based upon the market price of $36.31 per share, which was the closing
price per share on the NASDAQ National Market System on the last day of the
1998 fiscal year, less the option exercise price payable per share.
24
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial
ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of March 1, 1999, by (i) each
person (or group of affiliated persons) known by the Company to own
beneficially more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock, (ii) each of the
Company's directors, (iii) each Named Officer, and (iv) the Company's
directors and executive officers as a group. Except as indicated in the
footnotes to this table, the persons named herein, based on information
provided by such persons, have sole voting and investment power with respect
to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to
community property laws, where applicable.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES BENEFICIALLY
DIRECTORS, NAMED OFFICERS AND 5% SHAREHOLDERS OWNED
- --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
NUMBER PERCENT (1)
<S> <C> <C>
Kopp Investment Advisors, Inc. (2) 3,552,707 8.8%
6600 France Avenue South, Suite 672
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Capital Research and Management Company (3) 2,200,000 5.5%
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Robert S. Pepper, Ph.D. (4) 829,424 2.1%
Thomas J. Connors (5) 124,874 *
Paul Gray, Ph.D. (6) 67,500 *
Martin Jurick (7) 40,500 *
Henry Kressel, Ph.D. (8) 32,669 *
Joseph P. Landy (9) 53,051 *
John Kehoe (10) 155,375 *
Daniel S. Koellen (11) 201,079 *
George Papa (12) 67,846 *
Visveswar Akella (13) 602,808 1.5%
David T. McKinnon (14) 22,449 *
Michael A. Ricci (15) 15,000 *
Michael R. Wodopian (16) 18,000 *
All Named Officers and Directors as a group
(10 persons)(17) 2,230,575 5.5%
</TABLE>
* less than 1%
25
<PAGE>
(1) Percent ownership is based on 38,992,940 shares of Common Stock
outstanding as of March 1, 1999, plus shares issuable pursuant to options
or warrants held by the person or class in question that are exercisable
within 60 days after March 1, 1999.
(2) Includes 3,082,707 shares over which Kopp Investment Advisors, Inc.
exercises investment discretion, but for which it is not the record
holder; 372,500 shares which Kopp Investment Advisors, Inc., owns
directly; and 97,500 shares owned by LeRoy C. Kopp.
(3) Capital Research and Management Company, an investment advisor registered
under section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 is deemed to be
the beneficial owner of 2,200,000 shares of common stock as a result of
acting as investment advisor to various investment companies. The Capital
Research and Management Company disclaims beneficial ownership. SMALLCAP
World Fund, Inc, and investment company registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, which is advised by Capital Research and Management
Company, is the beneficial owner of 1,870,000 shares.
(4) Includes 648,676 shares issuable under stock options held by Dr. Pepper
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(5) Includes 61,874 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Connors
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(6) Includes 67,500 shares issuable under stock options held by Dr. Gray
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(7) Includes 18,000 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Jurick
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(8) Includes 4,500 shares held of record by Warburg Pincus Capital Co.
("Warburg"). Dr. Kressel is a managing director of a Warburg affiliate,
and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
(9) Includes 4,500 shares held of record by Warburg. Mr. Landy is a managing
director of a Warburg affiliate, and disclaims beneficial ownership of
such shares.
(10) Includes 155,375 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Kehoe
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(11) Includes 175,481 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Koellen
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(12) Includes 63,000 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Papa
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(13) Includes 36,559 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Akella
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(14) Includes 22,000 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. McKinnon
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(15) Includes 15,000 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Ricci
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(16) Includes 18,000 shares issuable under stock options held by Mr. Wodopian
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
(17) Includes 1,281,465 shares issuable under stock options held by the named
executives exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 1999.
26
<PAGE>
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In connection with securing a loan from Warburg in 1992, the Company
issued a warrant to purchase 304,119 shares of its common stock at an
exercise price of $1.03 per share. The warrant was exercised January 16,
1997, for 289,131 shares, and the balance was surrendered, on a net
appreciation basis, in an amount equal to the exercise price. Directors
Kressel and Landy, each of whom is an affiliate of the entity controlling
Warburg, disclaims beneficial ownership, for purposes of Section 16 of the
Act and otherwise, of such common stock.
The Company issued a bridge loan for $500,000 to one of its officers in
December 1998 at an interest rate of 6.0%. The loan was repaid in full in
January 1999.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Company's Compensation Committee currently consists of directors
Connors, Jurick and Kressel. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves
the compensation of the Company's executive officers. The compensation of the
Chief Executive Officer is subject to approval by the Board of Directors.
During 1998, Mr. Connors was granted options to purchase 4,500 shares at a
price of $18.83 per share, the market price on the grant date.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K.
(a) THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FORM 10-K
PAGE NO.
---------
<S> <C>
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Report of Independent Public Accountants............................................. 29
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 27, 1998 and December 28, 1997 .......... 30
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended
December 27, 1998, December 28, 1997, and December 29, 1996...................... 31
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the fiscal years ended
December 27, 1998, December 28, 1997, and December 29, 1996...................... 32
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 27, 1998,
December 28, 1997, and December 29, 1996......................................... 33
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 34
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE:
II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts................................................ 49
</TABLE>
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information as shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
27
<PAGE>
3. EXHIBITS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
<S> <C>
3.1(7) Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
3.2(7) Bylaws of the Company
4.1(4) Indenture, dated as of August 15, 1997, between the Company
and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California
(National Association) as Trustee
4.2(4) Form of 4% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2004
10.1^^(1) 1985 Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option and
Restricted Stock Purchase Plan, as amended
10.2^^(3) 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated
10.3^^(1) Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.4^^(1) Form of Directors' Indemnification Agreement
10.5^(2) Amendment to Deposit Agreement
10.6(5) Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of June 25,
1998, by and between the Company, Aardvark Aquisition Corp.
and Acclaim Communications, Inc.
10.7(6) Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of November
9, 1998, by and between the Company, Thunderhill Acquisition
Corp. and Jato Technologies, Inc.
21.1* Subsidiaries of Registrant (see page S-3)
23.1* Consent of Independent Public Accountants (see page S-4)
24.1* Powers of Attorney (see page S-1)
27.1* Financial Data Schedule, December 28, 1997
</TABLE>
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 33-65810) filed on August 19, 1994
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the Period Ended June 29, 1997
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-06300) filed on September 23, 1996
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-37957) filed on October 15, 1997
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 17, 1998
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on December 9, 1998
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-71905) filed on February 5, 1999
* Filed herewith
^ Confidential treatment granted
^^ Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
Amendment No. 2 to Form 8-K, filed on October 7, 1998, to provide under Item 5
(i) Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for the fiscal years ended December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996 to
reflect the Registrant's acquisition of Acclaim Communications, Inc.
("Acclaim"), (ii) the audited consolidated balance sheets of the Registrant and
its subsidiaries as of December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 28, 1997, and (iii)
supplementary unaudited consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the periods ending
March 29, 1998, June 28, 1998, March 30, 1997, and June 29, 1997 to reflect the
Registrant's acquisition of Acclaim.
Amendment No. 3 to Form 8-K, filed on December 16, 1998, to update under Item 5
a Report of Independent Accountants.
Form 8-K, filed on November 20, 1998, to report under Item 5 the Registrant's
execution of a definitive agreement to acquire Jato Technologies, Inc. ("Jato")
Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 1998, to (i) report under Item 2 the completion
of the Registrant's acquisition of Jato (the "Jato Acquisition"), and (ii)
include as exhibits under Item 7 the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and
the Certificate of Merger relating to the Jato Acquisition.
28
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Level One Communications, Incorporated:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LEVEL ONE
COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED (a California corporation) and subsidiaries as
of December 27, 1998 and December 28, 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
three fiscal years in the period ended December 27, 1998. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Level One Communications,
Incorporated and subsidiaries, as of December 27, 1998 and December 28, 1997,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three fiscal years in the period ended December 27, 1998, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index of
financial statement schedule is presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not a part of the basic
financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in
our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Sacramento, California
February 26, 1999, except with
respect to the matter discussed in
Note 15, as to which the date is March 4, 1999
29
<PAGE>
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 27, 1998, and December 28, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997
----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 28,794 $ 27,694
Short-term investments 92,712 112,560
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $418 and $343 for 1998 and 1997, respectively 35,820 30,174
Other receivables 2,620 2,490
Inventories 20,495 26,699
Deferred income taxes 2,302 4,050
Prepaid expenses 3,775 3,058
----------------- -----------------
Total current assets 186,518 206,725
Property and equipment, net 48,899 34,050
Long-term investments 68,577 21,559
Note acquisition costs 2,802 3,296
Foundry deposits 16,460 14,000
Other assets 3,034 4,132
----------------- -----------------
Total assets $ 326,290 $ 283,762
----------------- -----------------
----------------- -----------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of capital lease obligations $ 1,241 $ 1,211
Accounts payable 22,319 21,340
Accrued payroll costs 9,925 4,719
Notes payable - 5,949
Deferred revenues 4,082 5,171
Other accrued liabilities 8,850 9,596
----------------- -----------------
Total current liabilities 46,417 47,986
Convertible subordinated notes 115,000 115,000
Capital lease obligations, less current portion 1,545 2,175
Deferred lease expense 136 299
----------------- -----------------
Total liabilities 163,098 165,460
Shareholders' Equity:
Common Stock, no par value 124,412 102,899
Authorized - 236,250 shares
Outstanding - 38,511 and 36,152 shares
for 1998 and 1997, respectively
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax 481 19
Retained earnings 38,299 15,384
----------------- -----------------
Total shareholders' equity 163,192 118,302
----------------- -----------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 326,290 $ 283,762
----------------- -----------------
----------------- -----------------
</TABLE>
30
<PAGE>
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 27, 1998, December 28, 1997,
and December 29, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) 1998 1997 1996
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 262,988 $ 156,500 $ 111,987
Cost of sales 109,656 65,583 48,477
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Gross margin 153,332 90,917 63,510
Research and development (1) 55,459 37,757 26,923
Sales and marketing 39,504 26,532 17,154
General and administrative (2) 22,113 12,507 7,487
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total operating expenses 117,076 76,796 51,564
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Operating income 36,256 14,121 11,946
Interest income 9,057 4,016 1,884
Interest expense (5,976) (2,243) (352)
Other income 230 109 729
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Income before provision for income taxes 39,567 16,003 14,207
Provision for income taxes 16,652 9,450 6,374
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Net income $ 22,915 $ 6,553 $ 7,833
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Basic earnings per share $ 0.62 $ 0.19 $ 0.25
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.57 $ 0.18 $ 0.24
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
</TABLE>
(1) Includes one-time charge of $2,500 in 1996 for the acquisition
of Silicon Design Experts, Inc.
(2) Includes one-time charges of $3,600 in 1998 for the acquisitions of
Acclaim Communications, Inc. and Jato Technologies Inc.
31
<PAGE>
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 27, 1998, December 28, 1997,
and December 29, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Accumulated
Common Stock Other
---------------------- Retained Comprehensive
Shares Amount Earnings Income/ (loss) Total
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 30, 1995 31,115 $78,492 $ 998 $ 68 $79,558
Shares issued in business combinations 753 3,580 - - 3,580
Issuance of common stock under stock option
and purchase plans 423 1,243 - - 1,243
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants 5 10 - - 10
Tax benefit of stock option exercises - 1,205 - - 1,205
Stock issued in connection with acquisitions 195 3,000 - - 3,000
Comprehensive income:
Net income - - 7,833 - 7,833
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale
investments, net of tax (55) (55)
-----------
Comprehensive income 7,778
-----------
-----------
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------------- -----------
Balance at December 29, 1996 32,491 87,530 8,831 13 96,374
Shares issued in business combinations 2,333 6,702 - - 6,702
Issuance of common stock under stock option
and purchase plans 894 3,538 - - 3,538
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants 434 - - - -
Tax benefit of stock option exercises - 5,129 - - 5,129
Comprehensive income:
Net income - - 6,553 - 6,553
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale
investments, net of tax 6 6
-----------
Comprehensive income 6,559
-----------
-----------
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------------- -----------
Balance at December 28, 1997 36,152 102,899 15,384 19 118,302
Shares issued in business combinations 1,186 6,974 - - 6,974
Issuance of common stock under stock option
and purchase plans 1,173 7,021 - - 7,021
Tax benefit of stock option exercises - 7,518 - - 7,518
Comprehensive income:
Net income - - 22,915 - 22,915
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale
investments, net of tax 462 462
-----------
Comprehensive income 23,377
-----------
-----------
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------------- -----------
Balance at December 27, 1998 38,511 $ 124,412 $ 38,299 $ 481 $ 163,192
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------------- -----------
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------------- -----------
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 27, 1998, December 28, 1997,
and December 29, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997 1996
-------------- --------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 22,915 $ 6,553 $ 7,833
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 15,836 10,486 7,494
Purchased research & development expenses - - 2,500
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Trade accounts receivable (5,646) (12,503) (3,180)
Other receivables (130) (1,882) 288
Inventories 6,204 (16,709) 5,782
Deferred income taxes 1,748 (1,546) 1,785
Prepaid expenses (717) (950) 182
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 12,957 29,422 (4,101)
Deferred revenues (1,089) 2,132 2,954
Deferred lease expense (163) (313) (37)
-------------- --------------- --------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 51,915 14,690 21,500
-------------- --------------- --------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of debt and equity securities available-for-sale (132,550) (198,094) (24,534)
Maturities and sales of debt and equity securities available-for-sale 110,508 88,133 14,744
Purchases of non-marketable equity securities (4,666) (1,500) -
Net capital expenditures (29,636) (19,371) (10,280)
Payments for related party notes receivable - - 1,225
Net payments for foundry deposits and other assets (1,917) (6,233) (6,165)
-------------- --------------- --------------
Net cash used in investing activities (58,261) (137,065) (25,010)
-------------- --------------- --------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net principal payments under capital lease obligations (600) (960) (527)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible subordinated notes,
net of acquisition costs - 111,539 -
Proceeds (payments) from issuance of notes (5,949) 5,949 -
Proceeds from issuance of stock, net of
repurchases and costs of issuance 13,995 10,240 4,833
-------------- --------------- --------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 7,446 126,768 4,306
-------------- --------------- --------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 1,100 4,393 796
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 27,694 23,301 22,505
-------------- --------------- --------------
-------------- --------------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 28,794 $ 27,694 $ 23,301
-------------- --------------- --------------
-------------- --------------- --------------
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF CASH AND NONCASH TRANSACTIONS
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock in exchange for marketable securities $ - $ - $ 750
Issuance of warrants - 586 -
Equipment purchased under capital lease obligations - - 749
Tax benefit related to stock options 7,518 5,129 1,205
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax 462 6 (55)
Cash payments for:
Interest 5,422 616 351
Income taxes 7,393 3,861 2,564
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
Level One Communications, Incorporated (the "Company") was incorporated in
California on November 26, 1985. Subsequent to year end the Company amended its
Certificate of Incorporation to be reincorporated in the state of Delaware.
The Company provides silicon connectivity, Local Area Network ("LAN")
switching and Wide Area Network ("WAN") access solutions for high-speed telecom
and networking applications. These components are critical elements in today's
telecommunication and data communication networks and are the key building
blocks for the Intranets and Internets of the future. Level One combines its
strengths in analog and digital circuit design, with its communications systems
expertise, to produce digital and mixed-signal solutions with increased
functionality and greater reliability, resulting in lower total systems cost.
On July 6, 1998, the Company completed a business combination with Acclaim
Communications Inc. ("Acclaim") which is a provider of Fast Ethernet and Gigabit
Ethernet switches and integrated Multi-Service access products. The combination
was a stock for stock merger that was accounted for as a "pooling-of-interests."
In connection with the merger, the Company issued 3,961,374 shares of common
stock, and assumed 780,278 stock options and 256,485 warrants in exchange for
all the outstanding stock, options and warrants of Acclaim.
On November 24, 1998, the Company completed a business combination with
Jato Technologies, Inc. ("Jato") which is a silicon provider of high
performance, multi-speed Gigabit Ethernet controller technology. The combination
was a stock for stock merger that was accounted for as a "pooling-of-interests."
In connection with the merger, the Company issued 2,551,152 shares of common
stock, and assumed 486,088 stock options in exchange for all the outstanding
stock and options of Jato.
Accordingly, the Company's historical financial statements for fiscal years
1998, 1997 and 1996 have been restated to include the accounts of Acclaim and
Jato as if the companies had combined at the beginning of the first period
presented.
34
<PAGE>
There were no significant transactions between the Company and Acclaim nor
between the Company and Jato prior to the combination and no adjustments were
necessary to conform either Acclaim's or Jato's accounting policies. The results
of operations for the separate companies and the combined amounts presented in
the consolidated statements of income are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue
The Company $ 262,828 $ 156,262 $ 111,987
Acclaim 157 238 -
Jato 3 - -
-------------- -------------- ---------------
$ 262,988 $ 156,500 $ 111,987
-------------- -------------- ---------------
-------------- -------------- ---------------
Net Income (Loss)
The Company $ 34,855 $ 19,191 $ 11,213
Acclaim (6,482) (9,518) (3,160)
Jato (5,458) (3,120) (220)
-------------- -------------- ---------------
$ 22,915 $ 6,553 $ 7,833
-------------- -------------- ---------------
-------------- -------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION. The Company prepares financial statements on a 52-53
week year.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. For purposes of the consolidated statements of
cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
INVESTMENTS. The Company accounts for investments pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities" ("SFAS 115"). This statement requires that
investments be classified into one of three categories: held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale, or trading. It requires that investments classified as
held-to-maturity be reported at amortized cost, that investments classified as
available-for-sale be reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses,
net of related tax, reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity,
and that investments classified as trading be reported at fair value with
unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. As of December 27, 1998 and
December 28, 1997, all of the Company's investments are classified as
available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. As of December 27, 1998, and
December 28, 1997, the Company's shareholders' equity reflected an unrealized
gain, net of applicable taxes of $481,000 and $19,000, respectively.
35
<PAGE>
The amortized cost and market value of the Company's investments
available-for-sale as of December 27, 1998 and December 28, 1997, were as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 27, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS) GROSS UNREALIZED GROSS UNREALIZED
AMORTIZED COST GAINS LOSSES MARKET VALUE
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Municipal bonds $ - $ - $ - $ -
Corporate debt and equity securities 160,526 898 135 161,289
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
$ 160,526 $ 898 $ 135 $ 161,289
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 28, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS) GROSS UNREALIZED GROSS UNREALIZED
AMORTIZED COST GAINS LOSSES MARKET VALUE
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Municipal bonds $ 11,528 $ 24 $ - $ 11,552
Corporate debt and equity securities 122,561 36 30 122,567
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
$ 134,089 $ 60 $ 30 $ 134,119
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
The amortized cost and market value of the Company's investments
available-for-sale, by maturity, at December 27, 1998, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 27, 1998
------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS) AMORTIZED COST MARKET VALUE
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Due in one year or less $ 92,677 $ 92,712
Due after one year through five years 67,849 68,577
-------------- -------------
$ 160,526 $ 161,289
-------------- -------------
-------------- -------------
</TABLE>
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale investments during fiscal 1998
and 1997 were $110.5 million and $88.1 million, respectively. The cost basis
used in determining realized gains and losses is specific identification. During
1998, gross gains of $40,400 and gross losses of $26,000 were realized, and
gross gains of $20,000 with no losses of were realized in 1997.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. The following methods and assumptions were used by
the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, trade accounts payable, and
convertible subordinated notes, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of
fair value. For investments, fair values are based on quoted market prices or
dealer quotes.
36
<PAGE>
INVENTORIES. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in,
first-out) or market and include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead
costs. Inventories as of December 27, 1998, and December 28, 1997, consisted of
the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997
---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $ 2,486 $ 9,133
Work-in-process 9,827 13,412
Finished goods 8,182 4,154
---------------- -----------------
Total inventories $ 20,495 $ 26,699
---------------- -----------------
---------------- -----------------
</TABLE>
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT. Property and equipment are recorded at cost.
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the following estimated
useful lives:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Machinery and equipment 3-5 years
Furniture and fixtures 3-5 years
Leasehold improvements 6-10 years
</TABLE>
Property and equipment, net, as of December 27, 1998 and December 28, 1997
is comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
1998 1997
---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Machinery and equipment $ 49,857 $ 36,427
Furniture and fixtures 34,943 20,750
Leasehold improvements 5,420 3,407
---------------- -----------------
90,220 60,584
Less-Accumulated depreciation (41,321) (26,534)
---------------- -----------------
$ 48,899 $ 34,050
---------------- -----------------
---------------- -----------------
</TABLE>
PATENT COSTS. Patent costs include direct costs of obtaining the patents.
Upon patent approval, patent costs are amortized over the estimated useful life
of the patent using the straight-line method.
REVENUE RECOGNITION. Product sales are generally recognized upon shipment
of product. However, the Company defers recognition of revenues and gross margin
from sales to stocking distributors until such distributors resell the related
products to their customers. The Company has deferred recognition of gross
margin amounting to $4,082,000, $2,496,000, and $912,000 as of December 27,
1998, December 28, 1997, and December 29, 1996, respectively.
Revenue from development and license agreements is deferred until contract
milestones are met while related costs are expensed as incurred and are included
in research and development expenses. The Company had no deferred revenue
related to development and license agreements as of December 27, 1998. As of
December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996, the Company had deferred revenue of
$2,675,000 and $2,175,000, respectively. Royalty income is recognized in the
period that the income is earned.
37
<PAGE>
In 1996, the Company entered into a four year development and license
agreement with a company to develop certain technologies and receive license,
development and royalty fees through the term of the agreement. As of December
31, 1997, the Company had received payments totaling $2,675,000 under this
development and license agreement. The agreement called for certain performance
milestones which had not been met as of December 28, 1997. The dispute as to who
was responsible for not meeting the required milestones was settled on September
9, 1998 with a payment of $750,000 by the Company and a mutual release. Revenue
of $1,925,000 was recognized in 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Revenues are comprised of the following:
(IN THOUSANDS)
1998 1997 1996
--------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Product sales $ 258,914 $ 155,457 $ 111,392
Royalties, licenses and non-recurring
engineering revenue 4,074 1,043 595
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Total revenues $ 262,988 $ 156,500 $ 111,987
--------------- --------------- ---------------
--------------- --------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
INCOME TAXES. The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109), "Accounting for Income
Taxes." This statement provides for a liability approach under which deferred
income taxes are provided based upon enacted tax laws and rates applicable to
the periods in which the taxes become payable.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION. As of December 31, 1995, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" ("SFAS 123"). This statement defines a fair-value-based method of
accounting for stock-based compensation. As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company
has not changed its method of accounting for stock options but has provided the
additional required disclosures.
EARNINGS PER SHARE. As of December 28, 1997, the Company adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No 128, "Earnings Per Share," which
establishes standards for computing and presenting earnings per share ("EPS").
It replaces the presentation of primary EPS with a presentation of basic EPS. It
also requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the
income statement for all entities with complex capital structures and requires
reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to
the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME. As of December 27, 1998, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 "Reporting Comprehensive
Income" ("SFAS 130"). Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of
a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances,
excluding transactions resulting from investments by owners and distribution to
owners. The difference between the Company's net income and the Company's
comprehensive income is due to unrealized gains and losses on available for
sales debt and equity investments. The Company is showing comprehensive income
in the statement of Shareholders' Equity.
SEGMENT REPORTING. As of December 27, 1998, the Company adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information"
38
<PAGE>
("SFAS 131"). SFAS 131 supersedes adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 14, "Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise"
and replaces the "industry segment" approach with the "management" approach.
The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by
management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the
source of a company's reportable segments. SFAS 131 also requires disclosures
about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The
adoption of SFAS 131 did not affect the results of operations or financial
position or the segments reported in 1998. (see Note 11 for related
disclosure.)
FINANCIAL PRESENTATION. Certain prior year amounts in the Consolidated
Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 1998
presentation.
3. LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company sold $115 million of 4% convertible subordinated notes during
1997. The notes will mature on September 1, 2004. Unless previously redeemed or
repurchased, the notes are convertible at any time through the close of business
on the final maturity date of the notes, into common stock of the Company, at a
conversion price of $26.67 per share. Interest on the notes is payable
semi-annually, commencing March 1, 1998. Total interest accrued on the
convertible subordinated notes was approximately $1,475,000 and $1,550,000 at
December 27, 1998 and December 28, 1997, respectively.
After September, 2000, the notes are redeemable at the option of the
Company, in whole or in part. The notes may be redeemed for either cash or
common stock at a repurchase price of 105% of the principal amount of the notes
to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest to the repurchase date.
The notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are subordinated to
all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company. The indenture
contains no limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness or other
liabilities by the Company.
39
<PAGE>
4. LEASES
The Company conducts its operations using leased facilities and equipment
under both capital and operating leases. Minimum future lease payments as of
December 27, 1998, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) CAPITAL LEASES OPERATING LEASES
-------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Year Ending
1999 $ 1,505 $ 17,264
2000 1,227 15,343
2001 95 12,176
2002 - 10,474
2003 - 6,915
Thereafter - 26,690
-------------- --------------------
$ 2,827 $ 88,862
--------------------
--------------------
Less-Interest portion (7.38% to 12%) (41)
--------------
Capital lease obligations 2,786
Less-Current portion (1,241)
--------------
Long-term portion $ 1,545
--------------
--------------
</TABLE>
Rent expense for operating leases was approximately $14.5 million, $9.4
million, and $7.5 million for the years ended December 27, 1998, December 28,
1997, and December 29, 1996, respectively.
5. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
1998 1997 1996
--------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current Income Taxes:
State $ 1,164 $ 1,098 $ 282
Federal 14,261 9,606 4,307
Deferred taxes:
State 140 242 696
Federal 1,087 (1,496) 1,089
--------------- ----------- -----------
Total tax provision $ 16,652 $ 9,450 $ 6,374
--------------- ----------- -----------
--------------- ----------- -----------
</TABLE>
40
<PAGE>
The tax benefits associated with exercises of nonqualified stock options
reduced taxes currently payable by $7,518,000, $5,129,000, and $1,205,000 in
1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. Such benefits were recorded as an increase
to common stock.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences
between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities. They
are measured by applying the enacted tax rates and laws in effect for the years
in which such differences are expected to reverse.
The significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 27, 1998, and December 28, 1997, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
1998 1997
--------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Inventory reserves $ 87 $ 1,893
Deferred income on shipments to distributors 1,534 1,822
Accounts receivable reserve 189 134
Deferred lease expense 75 151
Inventory Unicap adjustment 724 796
Accrued vacation 731 484
AMT credit carryforwards 66 365
R&D credit carryforwards 529 964
Net operating loss carryforwards 9,154 4,777
Other 64 (16)
--------------- -----------
Total deferred tax assets 13,153 11,370
Deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated depreciation (151) (356)
Unrealized loss on Section 475 securities (739) (669)
Unrealized gain on investments (278) (12)
Valuation allowance (9,683) (6,283)
--------------- -----------
Net deferred income taxes $ 2,302 $ 4,050
--------------- -----------
--------------- -----------
</TABLE>
The reconciliation of the federal tax rate to the effective tax rate is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
--------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Statutory federal tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 34.0%
Change in valuation allowance 8.6 32.5 7.7
Foreign taxes & foreign sales corporation (3.1) (4.5) (5.9)
State taxes 6.0 4.8 3.3
Non-deductible acquisition costs - 1.0 6.8
Research and development credits (4.4) (6.3) (0.5)
Tax exempt interest - (3.4) (0.5)
--------------- ----------- -----------
Effective income tax rate 42.1% 59.1% 44.9%
--------------- ----------- -----------
--------------- ----------- -----------
</TABLE>
41
<PAGE>
6. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
In July 1997, the Board of Directors authorized a 3-for-2 stock split,
which was effective on August 26, 1997 to holders of record on August 5, 1997.
All common stock amounts and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the
stock split.
On February 23, 1998, the Board of Directors authorized a 3-for-2 stock
split effective on March 30, 1998 to shareholders of record on March 9, 1998.
All common stock amounts and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the
stock split.
The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) PER SHARE
INCOME SHARES AMOUNT
-------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDING:
Net income:
1998 $ 22,915
1997 $ 6,553
1996 $ 7,833
BASIC EPS: income available to common shareholders
1998 $ 22,915 37,130 $ 0.62
1997 $ 6,553 34,203 $ 0.19
1996 $ 7,833 31,557 $ 0.25
Effect of dilutive securities:
Options and warrants:
1998 2,949
1997 2,281
1996 1,592
DILUTED EPS: income available to common
stockholders plus assumed conversions
1998 $ 22,915 40,079 $ 0.57
1997 $ 6,553 36,484 $ 0.18
1996 $ 7,833 33,149 $ 0.24
</TABLE>
No conversion is assumed for the convertible subordinated notes issued in
1997 because it would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. Options
to purchase approximately 178,000, 189,000 and 319,000 shares of common stock in
1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively, were not included in the computation of
diluted EPS because the options' exercise price was greater than the average
market price of the common shares, making the shares anti-dilutive.
7. STOCK OPTION AND PURCHASE PLANS AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS. The Company has five stock option plans,
the 1985 Stock Option Plan (the "1985 Plan"), the 1993 Stock Option Plan (the
"1993 Plan"), the San Francisco Telecom Stock Option Plan (the "SFT Plan"), the
Acclaim Communications 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "ACCL Plan"), the Jato
Technologies 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "Jato Plan") and an Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"). No further options may be granted under either the
1985 Plan, the SFT Plan, the
42
<PAGE>
ACCL Plan and the Jato Plan and 1,179,492 options previously granted under
these plans remain outstanding. The Company applies Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its plans.
Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its fixed stock
option plans. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined
consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), the Company's net
income and net income per common share would have been reduced to the
following pro forma amounts:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income
As reported $ 22,915 $ 6,553 $ 7,833
Pro forma 16,076 2,763 5,945
As reported earnings per share
Basic $ 0.62 $ 0.19 $ 0.25
Diluted 0.57 0.18 0.24
Pro forma earnings per share
Basic $ 0.43 $ 0.08 $ 0.19
Diluted 0.42 0.08 0.19
</TABLE>
The fair value of each option grant has been estimated on the date of the
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions used for grants in 1998, 1997, and 1996. In calculating compensation
cost: risk-free interest rates of 5.80, 6.12, and 6.15 percent, respectively,
and expected stock price volatility of 70%, an expected life of six years and no
dividend payments for 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.
Because the SFAS 123 method of accounting has not been applied to options
granted prior to January 1, 1995, and due to the nature and timing of option
grants, the resulting pro forma compensation cost may not be representative of
that to be expected in future years.
The Company has authorized the issuance of up to 1,012,500 shares of stock
to its full-time employees under the ESPP. The Company has sold 64,597 shares
and 67,487 shares as of December 27, 1998 and December 28, 1997, respectively,
and has sold a total of 233,599 shares through December 27, 1998. The Company
sells shares at 85% of the stock's market price, which is either the market
price at the beginning or at the end of the offering period, whichever is lower.
The Company may grant options for up to 8,612,500 shares under the 1993
Plan. The Company had 762,681 shares available for grant at December 27, 1998.
Under the 1993 Option Plan the option exercise price equals the market price on
date of grant.
All options previously granted in fiscal 1997 and 1996 under the ACCL Plan
have been converted into options of the Company's common stock. Each ACCL option
was converted into .362859 of the Company's options at exercise prices of $0.69
to $1.38. There were approximately 775,000 shares outstanding and 174,000
exercisable at December 27, 1998. All options were granted at a price equal to
the fair value of Acclaim stock at the grant date.
43
<PAGE>
All options previously granted in fiscal 1997 under the Jato Plan have been
converted into options of the Company's stock. Each Jato option was converted
into .458733 of the Company's options at exercise prices of $0.22 to $0.44.
There were approximately 486,000 shares outstanding and 178,000 of the options
were exercisable at December 27, 1998. All options were granted at a price equal
to the fair market of Jato stock at the grant date.
The following table presents the aggregate options granted, forfeited, and
exercised under the 1985 Plan, 1993 Plan, SFT Plan, the ACCL Plan, and the Jato
Plan for the years ended December 27, 1998, December 28, 1997, and December 29,
1996, at their respective weighted average exercise prices.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
------------------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------------------
(SHARES IN THOUSANDS) Weighted Average Weighted
Weighted Average Exercise Price Average
Shares Exercise Price Shares Shares Exercise Price
------------ ---------------- ------------ --------------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, beginning of period 6,810 $ 9.24 4,752 $ 6.14 3,342 $ 5.06
Granted
Price = Fair Value 2,338 18.52 2,552 15.29 1,624 9.56
Price < Fair Value 271 3.76 541 0.57 482 0.87
Exercised (1,152) 4.92 (696) 3.73 (391) 2.47
Canceled (296) 11.81 (339) 8.49 (305) 8.96
------------ ---------------- ------------ --------------- ----------- ----------------
Outstanding, end of period 7,971 $ 12.31 6,810 $ 9.25 4,752 $ 6.14
------------ ---------------- ------------ --------------- ----------- ----------------
------------ ---------------- ------------ --------------- ----------- ----------------
Exercisable, end of period 2,224 1,820 1,565
------------ ------------ -----------
------------ ------------ -----------
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding under
the 1985 Plan, 1993 Plan, the SFT Plan, the ACCL Plan, and the Jato Plan at
December 27, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------
(SHARES IN THOUSANDS) Weighted Avg.
Shares Remaining Shares
Outstanding As Contractual Life Weighted Avg. Exercisable As Weighted Avg.
Range of Exercise Prices of 12/27/98 in Years Exercise Price of 12/27/98 Exercise Price
- ------------------------------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0.17 $ 7.44 2,148 7.04 $ 3.49 1,306 $ 2.73
7.50 12.67 1,997 7.56 10.04 654 9.71
12.78 17.44 2,364 9.26 16.73 126 15.50
18.00 27.17 1,462 9.12 21.20 138 20.34
- ------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
$ 0.17 $ 27.17 7,971 8.21 12.31 2,224 $ 6.60
- ------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
- ------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE>
Options for all plans are exercisable in installments at intervals
determined by the Board of Directors, not to exceed ten years and one day.
401(k) TAX DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN. The Company has a 401(k) Tax Deferred
Savings Plan (the "401(k) Plan") under which eligible employees may elect to
have a portion of their salary deferred and contributed to their accounts under
the 401(k) Plan. Under the 401(k) Plan, the Company will contribute at least 1%
(and up to a maximum of 3%) of an eligible employee's annual gross salary to the
employee's account under the 401(k) Plan. For the fiscal years ended December
27, 1998, December 28, 1997, and December 29, 1996, the Company has contributed
$986,000, $490,000, and $420,000, respectively, to the 401(k) Plan.
8. INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company has reserved 202,500 shares of Common Stock for issuance to
employees pursuant to a stock bonus plan to be agreed upon by the Board of
Directors. As of December 27, 1998, no shares had been issued.
Beginning in January 1994, the Company implemented an incentive
compensation plan. The Company's incentive compensation plan provides for
incentive compensation for substantially all employees of the Company based upon
the achievement of specified operating and performance results. Incentive
compensation totaled $7,176,000, $3,739,000, and $1,791,000 for 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
9. STOCK WARRANTS
The Company has issued warrants to independent sales representatives to
purchase up to 98,708 shares of its Common Stock with exercise prices ranging
from $1.03 to $9.33 per share. As of December 27, 1998, an aggregate of 60,940
shares has been issued upon exercise of warrants.
In connection with securing a loan from investors in 1992, the Company
issued warrants to purchase 456,179 shares of Common Stock with an exercise
price of $0.67 per share. The warrants were exercised January 16, 1997, for
433,697 shares, and the balance was surrendered, on a net appreciation basis, in
an amount equal to the exercise price.
In connection with the issuance of notes in 1996, the Company issued
warrants to purchase 21,936 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of
$6.16 per share. The fair value of such warrants, aggregating approximately
$66,600, was recorded as additional interest expense during 1996.
In connection with the issuance of notes in 1997, the Company issued
warrants to purchase 234,549 of Common Stock with an exercise price of $6.16 per
share. The fair value of such warrants, approximately $586,000, was recorded as
common stock. The related issuance cost of $585,000 was recorded in other assets
and is being amortized to interest expense over the life of the recorded debt.
Interest expense includes amortization of these issuance costs totaling
$585,000.
As of December 27, 1998, an aggregate of 43,213 shares have been issued upon
exercise of the warrants issued in connection to the issuance of notes in
1996 and 1997.
45
<PAGE>
10. PREFERRED STOCK
No shares of Preferred Stock are currently outstanding. The Company's Board
of Directors is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock.
11. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
As of December 27, 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". The Company concluded
that it operates in one reportable segment: the communications connectivity
segment. In this segment, the Company designs, develops and markets Application
Specific Standard Product ("ASSP") integrated circuits and custom derivatives
for two primary markets: networking and telecommunications.
The following is a summary of the Company's revenue by market and
geographic area for 1998, 1997 and 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997 1996
------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Networking $177,893 $70,657 $57,845
Telecommunications 83,687 87,467 52,209
Other 1,408 (1,624) 1,933
------------- ------------- -------------
Total $262,988 $156,500 $111,987
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- -------------
United States $159,509 $101,895 $68,544
Singapore 27,026 18,537 14,824
Other foreign countries 76,453 36,068 28,619
------------- ------------- -------------
Total $262,988 $156,500 $111,987
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- -------------
</TABLE>
Geographic area data is based on product shipment destination or royalty
payer location.
Export sales as a percentage of revenues were 40%, 35%, and 39% for 1998,
1997, and 1996, respectively.
During 1998 and 1997 no single customer accounted for more than 10% of
revenues. In 1996, sales to Hewlett-Packard were 11.2% of total sales.
Long lived assets consist of net property and equipment and foundry
deposits. The following geographic summary of long-lived assets is based on
physical location:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998 1997 1996
------------------ ----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Long-lived assets:
United States $ 44,629 $ 32,356 $ 24,140
Singapore 17,634 15,627 8,000
Other foreign countries 3,096 67 -
------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Total $ 65,359 $ 48,050 $ 32,140
------------------ ----------------- -----------------
------------------ ----------------- -----------------
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE>
Singapore Long-lived assets consist primarily of Foundry deposits only, of
which $15,000,000 was refunded in the first quarter of 1999.
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Company paid consulting and/or directors'
fees of approximately $47,000, $117,000, and $129,600 respectively, to four
members of the Board of Directors.
During the third quarter of 1996, in connection with a third-party
financing for Maker Communications, Inc. ("Maker"), the Company sold a portion
of its minority interest in Maker for an aggregate of approximately $675,000.
This sale was accounted as a one-time gain recorded as "Other Income" in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company continues to hold a
minority interest in Maker and license certain Maker technology. Other
contractual rights and obligations, including the Company's obligation to
provide certain loan financing to Maker, were terminated in the transaction.
Following the transaction, Maker repaid the Company approximately $2.9 million,
the total balance under an outstanding note.
The Company issued a bridge loan to one of its officers in December 1998
for $500,000 at 6.0% interest, the loan was repaid in January 1999.
13. BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITIONS
On November 24, 1998, the Company completed a business combination with
Jato Technologies, Inc. ("Jato") which is a silicon provider of high
performance, multi-speed Gigabit Ethernet controller technology. The combination
was a stock for stock merger that was accounted for as a "pooling-of-interests."
In connection with the merger, the Company issued 2,551,152 shares of common
stock, and assumed 486,088 stock options in exchange for all the outstanding
stock and options of Jato.
On July 6, 1998, the Company completed a business combination with Acclaim
Communications Inc. ("Acclaim") which is a provider of Fast Ethernet and Gigabit
Ethernet switches and integrated Multi-Service access products. The combination
was a stock for stock merger that was accounted for as a "pooling-of-interests."
In connection with the merger, the Company issued 3,961,374 shares of common
stock, and assumed 780,278 stock options and 256,485 warrants in exchange for
all the outstanding stock, options and warrants of Acclaim.
During December 1996, the Company acquired Silicon Design Experts, Inc.
(SDE). In connection with the transaction, the Company issued an aggregate of
195,143 shares of its common stock valued at $3,000,000 to SDE's shareholders,
and agreed to issue additional shares of Common Stock in the future to SDE's
shareholders and employees, with the amount to be contingent upon the extent of
sales of products developed by SDE and Level One's stock price. The total
purchase price of $3,000,000 was allocated as follows: $500,000 to goodwill ,
and $2,500,000 for purchased research and development. The purchased research
and development of $2,500,000 was reported as a one-time charge. The transaction
was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, SDE's
operating results after the date of acquisition are included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
47
<PAGE>
14. FOUNDRY COMMITMENTS
The Company's current wafer requirements are supplied primarily by six
foundries. During 1995, the Company entered into five-year agreements with three
of its suppliers for committed foundry capacity in consideration of equipment
financing or cash deposits. There are no additional deposits due under the
Company's existing foundry agreements. During the first quarter of 1999, the
Company received deposit refunds of $15.0 million on its wafer capacity
agreements.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 4, 1999, the Company and Intel Corporation entered into a
definitive stock-for-stock merger agreement valued at approximately $2.2
billion under which Intel would acquire Level One. The acquisition is aimed
at providing advanced networking capabilities through increased bandwidth and
functionality through silicon integration. Under the terms of the agreement,
each share of Level One stock would be exchanged for 0.86 shares of Intel
stock, after adjusting for Intel's two-for-one stock split announced in
January 1999 and effective April 11, 1999. Approximately 37.2 million shares
of Intel stock would be issued, assuming the conversion of Level One's
outstanding convertible subordinated notes into Level One common stock when
permissible under their terms. The completion of this transaction is subject
to compliance with regulatory requirements, Level One stockholder approval,
and conditions customary in a transaction of this type. Upon completion of
the merger the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary reporting into
Intel's Network Communications Group and all Level One employees will
continue as employees of this subsidiary.
48
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in thousands)
Balance at Charged to
Beginning of Costs and Balance at End
Classification Period Expenses Deductions of Period
-------------- ------------ ---------------- ---------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1998:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 343 $ 75 $ - $ 418
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997:
Allowance for doubtful accounts 156 187 - 343
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996:
Allowance for doubtful accounts 300 - 144 156
</TABLE>
49
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON
ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Dated: March 29, 1999 By: /s/ ROBERT S. PEPPER
----------------------------------
Robert S. Pepper
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each of the officers and directors of Level One Communications,
Incorporated whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints
Robert S. Pepper and John Kehoe, and each of them, their true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution, each with power
to act alone, to sign and execute on behalf of the undersigned any amendment or
amendments to this Annual Report, and does hereby ratify and confirm all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND
IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ ROBERT S. PEPPER
-----------------------------------------
Robert S. Pepper,
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ THOMAS J. CONNORS
-----------------------------------------
Thomas J. Connors,
DIRECTOR
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ PAUL GRAY
-----------------------------------------
Paul Gray,
DIRECTOR
S-1
<PAGE>
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ MARTIN JURICK
-----------------------------------------
Martin Jurick,
DIRECTOR
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ HENRY KRESSEL
-----------------------------------------
Henry Kressel,
DIRECTOR
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ JOSEPH P. LANDY
-----------------------------------------
Joseph P. Landy,
DIRECTOR
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ KENNETH A. PICKAR
-----------------------------------------
Kenneth A. Pickar,
DIRECTOR
Dated: March 29, 1999
/s/ JOHN KEHOE
-----------------------------------------
John Kehoe,
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)
(PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
</TABLE>
S-2
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
Registrant has eight wholly-owned subsidiaries. Acclaim Communications,
Inc., which is incorporated in Delaware and does business under the name
Level One Communications, Incorporated; Jato Technologies, Inc., which is
incorporated in Delaware and does business under the name Level One
Communications, Incorporated; Level One Communications International,
Incorporated, which is incorporated in Barbados and does business under the
name Level One Communications International, Incorporated; San Francisco
Telecom, Inc., which is incorporated in California and does business under
the name San Francisco Telecom, Inc.; Silicon Design Experts California,
Inc., which is incorporated in California and does business under the name
Level One Communications, Incorporated; Level One Communications Europe SARL,
which is incorporated in France and does business under the name Level One
Communications Europe; Level One Communications GmbH, which is incorporated
in Germany and does business under the name Level One Communications; and
Level One Communications Sweden A.B., which is incorporated in Sweden and
does business under the name Level One Communications.
S-3
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
LEVEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements File Nos. 33-65810, 33-72398, 33-93360, 33-95590,
333-06300, 333-48333, 333-37957, 333-65433, 333-65435, 333-70833, 333-71873 and
333-71905.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Sacramento, California
March 29, 1999
S-4
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-START> DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-27-1998
<CASH> 28,794
<SECURITIES> 92,712
<RECEIVABLES> 35,820
<ALLOWANCES> 418
<INVENTORY> 20,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 186,518
<PP&E> 90,220
<DEPRECIATION> 41,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 326,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 46,417
<BONDS> 115,000
0
0
<COMMON> 124,412
<OTHER-SE> 38,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 326,290
<SALES> 262,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 262,988
<CGS> 109,656
<TOTAL-COSTS> 109,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 117,076
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 5,976
<INCOME-PRETAX> 39,567
<INCOME-TAX> 16,652
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 22,915
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 22,915
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.62
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.57
</TABLE>
