QUEENS COUNTY BANCORP INC
S-4/A, EX-99.4, 2000-09-25
SAVINGS INSTITUTIONS, NOT FEDERALLY CHARTERED
Previous: QUEENS COUNTY BANCORP INC, S-4/A, EX-99.3, 2000-09-25
Next: REGENESIS HOLDINGS INC, SC 13D, 2000-09-25

                                                                     APPENDIX D

[Lehman Letterhead]


June 27, 2000


Board of Directors
Haven Bancorp, Inc.
615 Merrick Avenue
Westbury, NY 11590

Members of the Board:

            We understand  that Haven Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company") and Queens
County  Bancorp,  Inc.  ("Queens  County")  will enter into a definitive  merger
agreement  pursuant  to which the  Company  will be merged  with and into Queens
County and each share of common stock of the Company will be converted  into the
right to receive  1.04 shares (the  "Exchange  Ratio") of common stock of Queens
County (the  "Merger").  The terms and conditions of the Merger are set forth in
more detail in the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 27, 2000 by and
between the  Company and Queens  County  (the  "Merger  Agreement").  We further
understand that, concurrently with the announcement of the Merger, Queens County
will  announce that it is prepared to repurchase up to 20.0% of the shares to be
issued to the  stockholders  of the  Company in the  transaction  to support the
price of Queens County's common stock following the announcement of the Merger.

            We have been  requested  by the Board of Directors of the Company to
render our opinion with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view,
to the  Company of the  Exchange  Ratio to be  offered  by Queens  County to the
stockholders  of the Company in the Merger.  We have not been requested to opine
as to, and our opinion does not in any manner address,  the Company's underlying
business decision to proceed with or effect the Merger.

            In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed and analyzed: (1) the Merger
Agreement  and  the  specific  terms  of  the  Merger,  (2)  publicly  available
information  concerning  the  Company  and Queens  County  that we believe to be
relevant to our analysis  including  without  limitation  annual reports on Form
10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1999,  quarterly  reports on Form 10-Q for
the quarter  ended March 31, 2000 and recent press  releases for the Company and
Queens  County,  (3)  financial and  operating  information  with respect to the
business,  operations  and  prospects  of  the  Company  furnished  to us by the
Company,  including without limitation projections prepared by management of the
Company and the master license agreement,  as well as the individual supermarket
branch license agreements,  entered into by the Company with Pathmark, Inc., (4)
financial and operating information with respect to the business, operations and
prospects of Queens  County  furnished to us by Queens  County,  (5) the trading
histories of the common stock of the Company and Queens  County and a comparison
of  these  trading  histories  with  those  of other  companies  that we  deemed
relevant,  (6) a  comparison  of the  historical  financial  results and present
financial  condition  of the  Company  and  Queens  County  with  those of other
companies  that we deemed  relevant,  including  without  limitation  historical
operating  performance of the Company in terms of  profitability  as measured by
ROAA and ROAE and  efficiency  ratio as compared to its peer group,  (7) current
third party research analyst  estimates of the future  financial  performance of
the Company and Queens  County,  (8) a comparison of the financial  terms of the
Merger with the  financial  terms of certain other recent  transactions  that we
deemed  relevant,  (9) the  potential  pro  forma  impact  of the  Merger on the
expected  future  financial  performance  of Queens  County,  (10) the  relative
contributions of the Company and Queens County to the assets,  equity,  earnings
and overall financial  performance of the combined company on a pro forma basis,
(11) the  results of efforts to solicit  indications  of interest  from  various
other  potential  buyers with  respect to an  acquisition  of all or part of the
Company,  and (12) the  increase  in  dividends  expected  to be received by the
Company's  stockholders as a consequence of the Merger. In addition, we have had
discussions  with the  managements  of the Company and Queens County  concerning
their  respective  businesses,   operations,   assets,  liabilities,   financial
conditions and prospects,  and the potential cost savings,  operating  synergies
and strategic  benefits  expected to result


                                      D-1





from a combination of the businesses of the Company and Queens County,  and have
undertaken  such  other  studies,  analyses  and  investigations  as  we  deemed
appropriate.

         In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information used by us
without assuming any responsibility for independent verification of such
information and have further relied upon the assurances of management of the
Company and Queens County that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances
that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the
financial projections of the Company and Queens County, upon advice of the
Company and Queens County, we have assumed that such projections have been
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments of the respective managements of the Company and Queens County as
to the future financial performance of the Company and Queens County (including,
without limitation, with respect to projected cost savings and operating
synergies expected to result from a combination of the businesses of the Company
and Queens County) However, in arriving at our opinion, we also used consensus
estimates of future financial performance of the Company and Queens County from
third party research analysts and, with respect to the Company, made certain
adjustments to such estimates based on various assumptions as to the future
operations of the Company. We have discussed these adjusted estimates for the
future financial profitability of the Company with management of the Company and
they have agreed with the appropriateness of the use of such adjusted estimates
in performing our analysis. In arriving at our opinion, we have not conducted a
physical inspection of the properties and facilities of Queens County or the
Company and have not made or obtained any evaluations or appraisals of the
assets or liabilities of Queens County or the Company. In addition, we are not
experts in the evaluation of loan portfolios or allowances for loan and real
estate owned losses and, upon advice of the Company and Queens County, we have
assumed that the Company's and Queens County's current allowances for loan and
real estate owned losses (including for off-balance sheet items) are in the
aggregate adequate to cover all such losses. Our opinion necessarily is based
upon market, economic and other conditions as they exist on, and can be
evaluated as of, the date of this letter.

         Upon advice of the Company and its legal and accounting advisors, we
have assumed that the Merger will qualify for purchase accounting treatment and
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, and therefore as a tax-free transaction to the
stockholders of the Company.

         Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion as of
the date hereof that, from a financial point of view, the Exchange Ratio to be
offered by Queens County to the stockholders of the Company in the Merger is
fair to the Company.

         We have acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection with
the Merger and will receive a fee for our services, a significant portion of
which is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. In addition, the
Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise out of
the rendering of this opinion. We also have performed and continue to perform
various investment banking services for Queens County and have received and will
receive customary fees for such services.


                                       D-2





         This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board of Directors of
the Company and is rendered to the Board of Directors in connection with its
consideration of the Merger. This opinion is not intended to be and does not
constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of the Company as to how such
stockholder should vote with respect to the Merger.

                                                 Very truly yours,

                                                 LEHMAN BROTHERS

                                                 By: /s/ Mark H. Burton
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Mark H. Burton
                                                     Managing Director


                                       D-3



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission