FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter ended March 31, 2000
Commission File Number 0-26132
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New York 13-3729162
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S.Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
c/o Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
390 Greenwich St. - 1st Fl.
New York, New York 10013
(Address and Zip Code of principal executive offices)
(212) 723-5424
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
<PAGE>
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Page
Number
PART I - Financial Information:
Item 1. Financial Statements:
Statement of Financial Condition
at March 31, 2000 and December 31,
1999 (unaudited). 3
Statement of Income and Expenses
and Partners' Capital for the three
months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999
(unaudited). 4
Notes to Financial Statements
(unaudited) 5 - 8
Item 2. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations 9 - 10
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures of Market Risk 11 - 12
PART II - Other Information 13 - 15
2
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2000 1999
ASSETS:
<S> <C> <C>
Equity in commodity futures trading account:
Cash $105,963,002 $114,347,833
Net unrealized appreciation
on open futures contracts 3,570,296 5,310,783
Commodity options owned at fair
value (cost $1,344,599 and $663,996 in
2000 and 1999, respectively) 2,615,415 501,192
--------------- ------------
112,148,713 120,159,808
Interest receivable 395,195 403,616
--------------- ------------
$112,543,908 $120,563,424
=============== ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses:
Commissions $498,567 $556,459
Management fees 308,714 326,697
Other 141,218 128,566
Redemptions payable 2,737,730 2,043,170
Commodity options written at fair
value (cost $1,000,686 and $0 in
2000 and 1999, respectively) 2,574,168 -
--------------- ----------
6,260,397 3,054,892
--------------- ----------
Partners' Capital:
General Partner, 2,048.9308 Unit
equivalents outstanding in 2000 and 1999 2,647,464 2,669,941
Limited Partners, 80,205.9795 and
88,128.2111 Units of Limited Partnership
Interest outstanding in 2000 and 1999,
respectively 103,636,046 114,838,591
--------------- -----------
106,283,510 117,508,532
--------------- -----------
$112,543,907 $120,563,424
=============== ============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Financial Statements.
3
<PAGE>
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
-------------- --------------
2000 1999
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Income:
Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity
futures:
Realized gains on closed positions $ 2,606,295 $ 808,558
Change in unrealized losses on open
positions (1,880,349) (3,842,489)
------------- -------------
725,946 (3,033,931)
Less, brokerage commissions including clearing fees
of $68,419 and $58,967, respectively (1,746,589) (2,072,448)
------------- -------------
Net realized and unrealized losses (1,020,643) (5,106,379)
Interest income 1,178,352 1,186,464
------------- -------------
157,709 (3,919,915)
------------- -------------
Expenses:
Management fees 936,724 969,506
Other expenses 29,349 36,252
------------- -------------
966,073 1,005,758
------------- -------------
Net loss (808,364) (4,925,673)
Additions 24,393 29,432
Redemptions (10,441,050) (4,341,012)
------------- -------------
Net decrease in Partners' capital (11,225,021) (9,237,253)
Partners' capital, beginning of period 117,508,532 143,904,261
------------- -------------
Partners' capital, end of period $ 106,283,511 $ 134,667,008
------------- -------------
Net asset value per Unit
(82,254.9103 and 99,764.7834 Units outstanding
at March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively) $ 1,292.12 $ 1,349.85
------------- -------------
Net loss per Unit of Limited Partnership
Interest and General Partner Unit equivalent $ (10.97) $ (47.90)
------------- -------------
See Notes to Financial Statements
4
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
1. General:
Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited
partnership organized under the laws of the State of New York, on August 13,
1993 to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of
commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts.
The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership are volatile and
involve a high degree of market risk. The Partnership commenced trading
operations on January 12, 1994.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC acts as the general partner (the
General Partner") of the Partnership. The Partnership's commodity broker is
Salomon Smith Barney Inc. ("SSB"). SSB is an affiliate of the General Partner.
The General Partner is wholly owned by Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc.
("SSBHI"), which is the sole owner of SSB. SSBHI is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Citigroup Inc. All trading decisions are made for the Partnership by Campbell &
Company, Inc., John W. Henry & Company, Inc., Rabar Market Research Inc.,
Willowbridge Associates, Inc. and Stonebrook Capital Management,
Inc.(collectively the "Advisors"). Trendview Management Inc. was terminated as
an Advisor to the Partnership effective January 31, 2000.
The accompanying financial statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of
management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership's financial
condition at March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999 and the results of its
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. These financial
statements present the results of interim periods and do not include all
disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. It is suggested
that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes included in the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December
31, 1999.
Due to the nature of commodity trading, the results of operations for the
interim periods presented should not be considered indicative of the results
that may be expected for the entire year.
5
<PAGE>
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
2. Net Asset Value Per Unit:
Changes in net asset value per Unit for the three months ended March 31,
2000 and 1999, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE-MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
-----------------
2000 1999
--------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Net realized and unrealized
losses $ (13.43) $ (49.70)
Interest income 13.46 11.64
Expenses (11.00) (9.84)
--------- --------
Decrease for period (10.97) (47.90)
Net Asset Value per Unit,
beginning of period 1,303.09 1,397.75
-------- ---------
Net Asset Value per Unit,
end of period $ 1,292.12 $ 1,349.85
=========== ==========
</TABLE>
3. Trading Activities:
The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a
variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and
derivative commodity instruments. The results of the Partnership's trading
activity are shown in the statement of income and expenses.
The Customer Agreement between the Partnership and SSB gives the
Partnership the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses.
6
<PAGE>
All of the commodity interests owned by the Partnership are held for trading
purposes. The average fair value during the periods ended March 31, 2000 and
December 31, 1999, based on a monthly calculation, was $7,243,386 and
$6,571,306, respectively. The fair value of these commodity interests, including
options thereon, if applicable, at March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, was
$3,611,543 and $5,811,975, respectively, as detailed below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fair Value
------------------------
March 31, December 31,
2000 1999
--------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Currency:
- -- Exchange Traded Contracts $ 626,406 $ 423,503
- -- OTC Contracts (1,744) 196,398
Energy (156,909) 1,095,761
Grains 634,636 64,492
Interest Rates U.S. 1,529,854 1,352,098
Interest Rates Non-U.S 1,154,945 220,653
Livestock 66,401 (19,700)
Metals 96,011 941,009
Softs (227,917) 493,230
Indices (110,140) 1,044,531
--------- -----------
Total $ 3,611,543 $ 5,811,975
============= ============
</TABLE>
4. Financial Instrument Risk:
The Partnership is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity
instruments, in the normal course of its business. These financial instruments
may include forwards, futures and options, whose value is based upon an
underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future
commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, to purchase or sell other
financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the
case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be
settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument.
These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter ("OTC").
Exchange traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain
option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and
include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to
various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments
including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC
contracts are greater than those associated with exchange traded instruments
because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.
Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial
instruments traded by the Partnership due to market changes, including interest
and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security
7
<PAGE>
prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the
markets in which the related underlying assets are traded.
Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of
a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with
respect to exchange traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange
or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The
Partnership's risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically
limited to the amounts recognized in the statement of financial condition and
not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The
Partnership has concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with
respect to the Partnership's assets is SSB.
The General Partner monitors and controls the Partnership's risk exposure
on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring
systems and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating
and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership is subject.
These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to statistically analyze
actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation
statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of
futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and
loss transactions and collateral positions.
The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments, while not
recorded in the financial statements, reflect the extent of the Partnership's
involvement in these instruments. The majority of these instruments mature
within one year of March 31, 2000. However, due to the nature of the
Partnership's business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.
8
<PAGE>
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Partnership does not engage in the sale of goods or services. Its only
assets are its equity in its commodity futures trading account, consisting of
cash, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open futures and forward
contracts, commodity options and interest receivable. Because of the low margin
deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price
movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership. While substantial
losses could lead to a decrease in liquidity, no such losses occurred during the
first quarter of 2000.
The Partnership's capital consists of the capital contributions of the
partners as increased or decreased by gains or losses on commodity futures
trading, expenses, interest income, additions and redemptions of Units and
distributions of profits, if any.
For the three months ended March 31, 2000, Partnership capital decreased
9.6% from $117,508,532 to $106,283,511. This decrease was attributable to the
redemption of 7,940.7226 Units totaling $10,441,050 coupled with net loss from
operations of $808,364 which was partially offset by additional sales of 18.4910
Units totaling $24,393. Additional Units offered represent a reduced brokerage
fee to existing limited partners investing $1,000,000 or more. Future
redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investments in
commodity contract positions in subsequent periods.
Results of Operations
During the Partnership's first quarter of 2000, the net asset value per
unit decreased 0.8% from $1,303.09 to $1,292.12 as compared to a decrease of
3.4% in the first quarter of 1999. The Partnership experienced a net trading
gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the first quarter of 2000
of $725,946. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity
futures in energy and U. S. interest rates and were partially offset by losses
in livestock, metals, currencies, non-U.S. interest rates, indices and softs.
The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before commissions and related
fees in the first quarter of 1999 of $3,033,931. Losses were primarily
attributable to the trading of commodity futures in livestock, indices, softs,
metals and non-U.S interest rates and were partially offset by gains in
currencies, U.S. interest rates, energy and grains.
Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and
9
<PAGE>
rapid inflation increase the risks involved in commodity trading, but also
increase the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends
on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to
identify correctly those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among
other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental,
agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and
international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To
the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them,
the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.
Interest income on 80% of the Partnership's daily equity maintained in cash
was earned on the monthly average 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined
weekly by SSB based on the non-competitive yield on three month U.S. Treasury
bills maturing in 30 days from the date in which such weekly rate is determined.
Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2000 decreased by $8,112,
as compared to the corresponding period in 1999. The decrease in interest income
is primarily due to the effect of redemptions on the Partnership's equity
maintained in cash.
Brokerage commissions are calculated on the Partnership's net asset value
as of the last day of each month and, therefore, vary according to trading
performance and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to
the fluctuations in monthly net asset values. Commissions and fees for the three
months ended March 31, 2000 decreased by $325,859, as compared to the
corresponding period in 1999.
Management fees are calculated on the portion of the Partnership's net
asset value allocated to each Advisor at the end of the month and, therefore,
are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Management fees for the
three months ended March 31, 2000 decreased by $32,782, as compared to the
corresponding period in 1999.
Incentive fees are based on the new trading profits generated by each
Advisor at the end of the quarter, as defined in the advisory agreements between
the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor. There were no incentive
fees earned for the three months ending March 31, 2000 or 1999.
10
<PAGE>
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk
The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive
instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or
substantially all of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading
loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is
integral, not incidental, to the Partnership's main line of business.
Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the
Partnership's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow.
The Partnership's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors,
including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity
price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the
diversification effects among the Partnership's open positions and the liquidity
of the markets in which it trades.
The Partnership rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short
positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible
to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and
the Partnership's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future
results.
Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership
could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the
inherent uncertainty of the Partnership's speculative trading and the recurrence
in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding
expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the
indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership's experience to date (i.e.,"risk of
ruin"). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties
intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification
included in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or
representation that the Partnership's losses in any market sector will be
limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership's attempts to manage its market
risk.
Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership
as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by
exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be
incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day
intervals. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally
available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk
component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk.
11
<PAGE>
The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the
Partnership's open positions by market category as of March 31, 2000. All open
position trading risk exposures of the Partnership have been included in
calculating the figures set forth below. As of March 31, 2000, the Partnership's
total capitalization was approximately $106,283,511. There has been no material
change in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
Year to Date
------------------
% of Total High Low
Market Sector Value at Risk Capitalization Value at Risk Value at Risk
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Currencies:
- Exchange Traded Contracts $ 805,012 0.76%$ 1,158,359 $ 862,289
- OTC Contracts 2,300,060 2.16% 3,574,254 1,860,662
Energy 1,419,200 1.34% 5,401,200 1,419,200
Grains 726,300 0.68% 791,300 314,250
Interest Rates U.S. 1,524,318 1.44% 2,104,984 622,467
Interest Rates Non-U.S 3,297,745 3.10% 6,211,403 2,789,401
Livestock 67,325 0.06% 115,375 29,075
Metals 1,670,325 1.57% 1,916,625 970,575
Softs 828,953 0.78% 1,489,882 828,953
Indices 2,128,081 2.00% 2,578,509 1,301,148
------------- ----------
Total $14,767,319 13.89%
============= ===========
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE>
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings-
For information concerning a suit filed by Harris Trust Savings Bank (as
trustee for the Ameritech Pension Trust) and others against Salomon Brothers
Inc., and Salomon Brothers Realty Corp., see the description that appears in the
second and third paragraphs under the caption "Legal Proceedings" beginning on
page 11 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 1999 (File No. 1-4346), which description is included as Exhibit
99.1 to this Form 10-Q and incorporated by reference herein. In April 2000, the
U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs' petition to reverse the
decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The U.S. Supreme
Court reserved its decision, and has not yet released its opinion.
For information concerning the complaints filed in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Board of Liquidations, City Debt of the
City of New Orleans v. Smith Barney, Inc. et ano. and The City of New Orleans v.
Smith Barney, Inc. et ano.), a purported class action in Florida against
numerous broker-dealers including the Company (Dwight Brock as Clerk for Collier
County v. Merrill Lynch, et al.), and the IRS and SEC industry-wide
investigation into the pricing of Treasury securities in advanced refunding
transactions, see the description that appears in the fourth, fifth and sixth
paragraphs under the caption " Legal Proceedings" beginning on page 11 of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of SSBHI for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-4346), which description is included as Exhibit 99.2 to this form 10-Q and
incorporated by reference herein. In April 2000, seventeen investment banks,
including the Company, entered into an agreement with the federal government to
settle charges related to the pricing of Treasury securities in advanced
refunding transactions. Thereafter, plaintiffs filed voluntary discontinuances
in the two Louisiana federal actions.
For information concerning the matter entitled MKP Master Fund, LDC et al.
v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., see the description that appears in the seventh
paragraph under the caption "Legal Proceedings" beginning on page 11 of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of SSBHI for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-4346), which description is included as Exhibit 99.3 to this Form 10-Q and
incorporated by reference herein. In March 2000, plaintiffs' motion to dismiss
the Company's amended counterclaims was argued, and no decision has been
rendered.
13
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1
Second and third paragraphs under the caption "Legal Proceedings" beginning
on page 11 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SSBHI for the year ended
December 31, 1999 (File No. 1-4346).
In September 1992, Harris Trust and Savings Bank (as trustee for Ameritech
Pension Trust ("APT")), Ameritech Corporation, and an officer of Ameritech filed
suit against Salomon Brothers Inc. ("SBI") and Salomon Brothers Realty
Corporation ("SBRC") in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois (Harris Trust Savings Bank, not individually but solely as trustee for
the Ameritech Pension Trust, Ameritech Corporation and John A. Edwardson v.
Salomon Brothers Inc and Salomon Brothers Realty Corp.). The second amended
complaint alleges that three purchases by APT from defendants of participation
interests in net cash flow or resale proceeds of three portfolios of motels
owned by Motels of America, Inc. ("MOA"), as well as a fourth purchase by APT of
a similar participation interest in a portfolio of motels owned by Best Inns,
Inc. ("Best"), violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"),
and that APT's purchase of the participation interests in the third MOA
portfolio and in the Best portfolio violated the Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organization Act ("RICO") and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive
Practices Act ("Consumer Fraud Act"), and constituted fraud, negligent
misrepresentation, breach of contract and unjust enrichment. SBI had acquired
the participation interests when it purchased principal mortgage notes issued by
MOA and Best to finance purchases of motel portfolios; 95% of three of those
interests and 100% of the fourth were sold to APT for a total of approximately
$20.9 million. Plaintiffs' second amended complaint seeks judgment (a) on the
ERISA claims for the approximately $20.9 million purchase price, for rescission
and for disgorgement of profits, as well as other relief, and (b) on the RICO
and state law claims in the amount of $12.3 million, with damages trebled to $37
million on the RICO claims and punitive damages in excess of $37 million on
certain of the state law claims as well as other relief. Following motions by
defendants, the court dismissed the RICO, Consumer Fraud Act, fraud, negligent
misrepresentation, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment claims. The court
also found that defendants were not ERISA fiduciaries and dismissed two of the
three claims based on that allegation. Defendants moved for summary judgment on
plaintiffs' only remaining claim, which alleged an ERISA violation. The motion
was denied, and defendants appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh
Circuit. In July 1999, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
reversed the denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the
sole remaining ERISA claim against the Company. Plaintiffs filed a petition for
certiorari with the U. S. Supreme Court seeking review of the decision of the
Court of Appeals. The petition was granted in January 2000.
14
<PAGE>
Both the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service have advised
SBI that they were or are reviewing the underlying transactions. With respect to
the Internal Revenue Service, SSBHI, SBI and SBRC have consented to extensions
of time for the assessment of excise taxes that may be claimed with respect to
the transactions for the years 1987, 1988 and 1989. In August 1996, the IRS sent
SSBHI, SBI and SBRC what appeared to be draft "30-day letters" with respect to
the transactions and SSBHI, SBI and SBRC were given an opportunity to comment on
whether the IRS should issue 30-day letters, which would actually commence the
assessment process. In October 1996, SSBHI, SBI and SBRC submitted a memorandum
setting forth reasons why the IRS should not issue such 30-day letters. Since
that time, the IRS has not issued such 30-day letters to SSBHI, SBI or SBRC.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds -
Additional Units offered represent a reduced brokerage fee to existing
limited partners in existing $1,000,000 or more. For the three months ended
March 31, 2000, there were additional sales of 18.4910 Units totaling
$24,393 and 21.5170 Units totaling $29,432 for the three months ended March
31, 1999.
Proceeds from the sale of additional Units are used in the trading of
commodity interest including futures contracts, options and forward
contracts.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None
Item 5. Other Information - None
Item 6. (a) Exhibits - None
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - None
15
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
By: Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
(General Partner)
By: /s/ David J. Vogel, President
David J. Vogel, President
Date: 5/12/00
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
(General Partner)
By: /s/ David J. Vogel, President
David J. Vogel, President
Date: 5/12/00
By: /s/ Daniel A. Dantuono
Daniel A. Dantuono
Chief Financial Officer and
Director
Date: 5/12/00
16
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911503
<NAME> SB Diversified Futures fund L.P.
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-2000
<CASH> 105,963,002
<SECURITIES> 6,185,711
<RECEIVABLES> 395,195
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 112,543,908
<PP&E> 0
<DEPRECIATION> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 112,543,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 6,260,397
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 106,283,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 112,543,908
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 157,709
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 966,073
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> (808,364)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (808,364)
<EPS-BASIC> (10.97)
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
