<PAGE>
===============================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
/x/ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999
OR
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR
THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____ TO _____ .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-22698
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOLDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA 95-4021568
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2125-C MADERA ROAD
SIMI VALLEY, CA 93065
(Address of principal executive offices)
(805) 582-4400
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
----------------------------------------------------
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED
TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING
THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS
REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS: YES NO X
--- ---
AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 THERE WERE 5,299,998 SHARES OF NO PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK
OUTSTANDING.
===============================================================================
<PAGE>
INDEX LISTING
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
Number
------
<S> <C>
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 1999 (unaudited) and March 31,
1999. 1
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months
ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998. 2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months
ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998. 3
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited). 4-6
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. 7-9
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. 9
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. 10
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. 10
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES 11
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE>
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
GOLDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 1999 March 31, 1999
--------------- ----------------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $60 $117
Accounts receivable, net of allowances 596 548
Inventories 572 612
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 120 143
-------- --------
Total current assets 1,348 1,420
-------- --------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT,
at cost, net of accumulated depreciation 603 628
-------- --------
$1,951 $2,048
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Short-term borrowings $8,741 $8,617
Accounts payable 787 885
Note payable under Recapitalization Plan 2,211 2,173
Net due to related parties 2,562 2,505
Notes payable 993 962
Accrued liabilities 1,160 1,044
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 16,454 16,186
-------- --------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
MINORITY INTEREST 2,599 2,599
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock 16,405 16,405
Accumulated deficit (34,535) (33,957)
Cumulative translation adjustments 1,028 815
-------- --------
Total shareholders' deficit (17,102) (16,737)
-------- --------
$1,951 $2,048
======== ========
</TABLE>
1
<PAGE>
GOLDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
---------------------------------
June 30, 1999 June 30, 1998
--------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
NET SALES $988 $777
COST OF GOODS SOLD 650 536
-------- --------
Gross profit (loss) 338 241
-------- --------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administration 347 311
Research and development 101 78
-------- --------
448 389
-------- --------
Operating loss (110) (148)
-------- --------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense (481) (463)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) 8 (7)
Gain on sale of subsidiary company --- 61
Other income (expense) 5 13
-------- --------
(468) (396)
-------- --------
Loss before provision for income taxes (578) (544)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES --- ---
-------- --------
NET LOSS $(578) $(544)
======== ========
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE $(0.11) $(0.10)
======== ========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
OUTSTANDING SHARES 5,300 5,300
======== ========
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
GOLDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
--------------------------------
June 30, 1999 June 30, 1998
--------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $(578) $(544)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense 23 10
Provision for losses on accounts receivable 15 40
Provision for losses on inventories --- 15
Decrease (increase) in:
Accounts receivable (63) 190
Inventories 29 78
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 21 (17)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable (83) 26
Accrued liabilities 518 462
-------- --------
Net cash used in (provided by)
operating activities (118) 260
-------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (11) (51)
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (11) (51)
-------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in related party balances 81 69
-------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities 81 69
-------- --------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (9) (263)
-------- --------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS (57) 15
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period 117 79
-------- --------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period $60 $94
======== ========
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE>
GOLDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 1. GENERAL
In management's opinion, all adjustments, which are necessary
for a fair presentation of financial condition and results of operations, are
reflected in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements. All
such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All amounts are unaudited,
except the March 31, 1999 balance sheet. This report should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, notes, and
disclosures presented in the Company's 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Footnotes and other disclosures which would substantially duplicate the
disclosures in the Company's audited financial statements for fiscal year
1999 contained in the Company's 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, have been
omitted. The interim financial information herein is not necessarily
representative of operations for a full year.
NOTE 2. RISKS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 have been
determined assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. However,
the Company is currently facing significant issues which raise substantial doubt
that the Company has the ability to continue as a going concern. These issues
are summarized as follows:
- At June 30, 1999, the Company had outstanding amounts due to
four separate Indian lenders in the amount of $9,734,000, all of
which are currently in default. Of that amount, three banks have
issued notices to the Company demanding immediate repayment of
$8,741,000. At March 31, 2000, the amount due to the banks was
approximately $9.5 million. The Company has insufficient funds
available to repay the banks. Because the Indian debt is secured
by the assets of Ultra Tek, alternatives available to the banks
include closing the operations of Ultra Tek and forcing Ultra
Tek into liquidation.
- In fiscal 1995, Ultra Tek's importing of computer components
into India came under investigation by the Indian customs
authorities. In September 1997, the Indian customs authorities
issued a separate "show cause" notice alleging that Ultra Tek
has not provided valid explanations for shortages of imported
raw material in its inventories. In fiscal 1997, Ultra Tek came
under the investigation of the Indian Department of Revenue
Intelligence concerning the import and export of certain
components used in the manufacture of power supplies and
customer returned product. Subsequently, a separate "show cause"
notice was issued requesting explanation of why duties should
not be assessed. The above governmental allegations and
investigations could lead to additional duty and penalties being
assessed against Ultra Tek in the amount of $2.5 million
(106,474,000 Indian rupees), using the Indian rupee translation
rate at January 31, 2000, and penal action being initiated
against Ultra Tek. In addition, penal action under Indian law,
which the Company believes is very unlikely, could result in
possible monetary fines of up to a maximum of $16.9 million. The
Company is contesting these allegations, but currently, the
matters are unresolved and the outcomes uncertain.
4
<PAGE>
- The Company has incurred significant losses from operations over
the past five fiscal years and quarter ended June 30, 1999; has
lost its two main historical customers, which has significantly
impacted its revenues; and at June 30, 1999, had a shareholders'
deficit of $17.1 million. During fiscal 2000, the Company
continued to incur significant losses, and management has not
successfully executed on its efforts to achieve profitable
operations and positive cash flows. Outside of related party
financing, the Company has identified no viable source of
financing.
Due to the significance of these factors in the Company's financial statements
at June 30, 1999, all assets have been stated at their estimated realizable
values. Costs of resolving the contingencies noted above or settling amounts due
to Indian banks or Company creditors have not been recorded as management is
currently unable to estimate these amounts. Accounts receivable and inventories
were valued at their subsequently realized amounts (inventories at cost), and
property, plant and equipment were valued based on estimates by management and
in accordance with the guidelines of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 121 "Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to Be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"). The estimated realizable values and
settlement amounts may be different from the proceeds ultimately received or
payments made.
NOTE 3. INVENTORIES
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first in, first out) or
market. Cost includes cost of material, freight and manufacturing overhead.
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 1999 March 31, 1999
------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $283 $359
Work-in-progress 198 156
Finished goods 91 97
------------- ---------------
$572 $612
============= ===============
</TABLE>
NOTE 4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
a) LEASES
GSI leased its corporate headquarters from a related party under a
three year operating lease until the lease expired in December 1999.
Ultra Tek leases certain factory premises from the Indian Government
under operating leases which expire at various dates through October
2000. Future minimum payments under these and other various operating
leases are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING MARCH 31:
<S> <C>
2000 (nine months) $ 65
2001 27
2002 -
2003 -
2004 -
----
$ 92
====
</TABLE>
5
<PAGE>
b) LITIGATION
The Company is subject to lawsuits in the normal course of business. In
the opinion of management and legal counsel to the Company, pending
litigation will not result in a material loss to the Company.
c) CONTINGENCIES
During fiscal year 1995, the Company's imports of computer components
for final assembly and sale into the domestic tariff area (DTA) of
India (outside the SEEPZ) came under investigation by the Indian
customs authorities. As a result, Company inventories of $1,088,000
(47,447,000 in Indian rupees) were seized by the authorities. On May
30, 1995, the authorities issued a notice to the Company alleging
misdeclaration of purported imports of complete computer systems as
imports of computer system components. The notice calls upon the
Company to explain why the authorities should not (a) confiscate all
the goods so imported, (b) levy additional duty of $1,121,000
(48,885,000 in Indian rupees) on the goods already sold into the DTA,
and (c) take penal action against the Company under the law. The
Company paid an advance of $700,000 (20,000,000 in Indian rupees)
against customs duty that may ultimately be levied by the authorities
and recorded this amount in "cost of goods sold" in fiscal 1995. During
fiscal 1996, the authorities released the seized goods. However,
because of difficulties encountered in re-exporting the goods and
technological obsolescence, the entire amount of the seized goods has
been included in the inventory reserve amounts at June 30, 1999. No
other penalties or expenses related to this government action have been
incurred by the Company.
In September 1997, the Indian customs authorities issued a "show cause"
notice alleging that Ultra Tek has not provided valid explanations for
shortages of raw material in its inventories. The notice called upon
the Company to explain why the authorities should not (a) impose duty
of $590,000 (25,725,000 in Indian rupees) leviable on imported
components which were alleged not accounted for in the terms of bond
executed, (b) why penal action should not be initiated against the
Company, and (c) why a penalty equal to the duty held to be leviable,
$590,000 (25,725,000 in Indian rupees), in respect of unaccounted goods
should not be imposed.
In fiscal 1997, the Company came under investigation by the Indian
Department of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) in connection with the import
and export of certain components and goods used in the manufacture of
power supplies and customer returns. The investigation focused on the
alleged discrepancy noted between the physical stock records and books,
in respect of the work-in-process inventory at March 31, 1996 and 1997
and customer returned product at March 31, 1992 through March 31, 1997.
In May 1998, the DRI issued a "show cause" notice requesting that the
Company explain why the DRI should not impose duties of approximately
$590,000 (25,720,000 in Indian rupees). Penalties relating to the
investigation, if any, have not yet been determined.
The aggregate of threatened duties and penalties to the Company is
approximately $2,442,000, using the Indian rupee translation rate at
January 31, 2000. Although the Company is contesting the allegations of
the authorities, the outcome of these matters is uncertain at this
time. Accordingly, no additional provisions for any losses that may
ultimately result have been made in these financial statements. In
addition, penal action under Indian law, which the Company believes is
very unlikely, could result in possible monetary fines of up to
$16,897,000 at January 31, 2000.
6
<PAGE>
GOLDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL
Any forward looking statements made in this Form 10-Q report involve
risks and uncertainties. The Company's future financial results could differ
materially from those anticipated due to the Company's dependence on conditions
in the electronics industry, level of consumer demand for products containing
the Company's power supply components, competitive pricing pressures, technology
and product development risks and uncertainties, product performance, increasing
consolidation of customers and suppliers in the electronics industry, and other
factors beyond the Company's control.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
As has been previously reported, the Company's operations and cash flow
were significantly impacted by the product rejection that took place during the
third quarter of fiscal 1995. Those returns cost the Company $4.2 million in
uncollected accounts receivable as a result of the issuance of credits for the
rejected units and $2.2 million relating to other direct costs, as well as
additional costs for transportation, unutilized capacity, business interruption,
reorganization, inventory carrying costs, and interest on short-term borrowings.
In fiscal 1996, the Company implemented a program to overcome its cash
difficulties by reducing inventory, organizational restructuring, price
increases, volume growth and more favorable payment terms from the Company's
existing customers. While a number of elements of that program were successfully
implemented, the Company has not been able to generate anticipated amounts of
cash from inventory reduction and, to date, has been unsuccessful in its efforts
to resell any significant number of units of the reworked rejected product. In
addition, the Company has not been successful, to date, in significantly
building its sales volumes to its existing customers or to new customers. While
the Company has implemented a plan to transition its business focus to power
supplies for products that are less price sensitive and therefore provide a
greater opportunity to develop positive profit margins, it has not been
successful in doing so. There can be no assurance that the Company will have
sufficient resources to carry out its plan in the future, or even if the
resources are available, that the Company will be able to successfully develop
the necessary customer relationships and obtain the product contracts to allow
it to continue to operate its business. In light of these facts, and the
operating results discussed below, the Company continues to look at
opportunities to obtain additional capital from sources outside the Company and
at transactions that would change it's fundamental structure.
In summary, the Company suffered a considerable decline in cash flow
during the five fiscal years ended March 31, 1999 and during the quarter ended
June 30, 1999. At June 30, 1999, the Company had negative working capital of
$15,106,000 and an
7
<PAGE>
accumulated deficit of $34,535,000. Subsequent to June 30, 1999, the Company
continues to experience negative cash flow as a result of continuing losses
and working capital required to ramp-up production in India. While current
action is being taken to develop a viable operating plan to increase sales
and renegotiate the terms of certain short-term obligations with the Indian
banks, there can be no assurance that any of these actions will be
successfully completed.
FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2000
Sales for the three months ended June 30, 1999 were $988,000 compared
to $777,000 for the same quarter in the prior year. This increase in sales of
27% is due principally to increased shipments to the Company's largest customer.
Gross profit on first quarter sales was $338,000 compared to a gross
profit of $241,000 for the first quarter in fiscal year 1999. This increase in
gross profit was due to the aforementioned increase in sales as well as a
significant increase in gross margins on those sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2000 were $347,000 compared to $311,000 or an increase of 12%. This
increase is due primarily to the addition of a sales representative and general
cost increases.
Research and development expenses for the current quarter were $101,000
as compared to $78,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 1999. This increase
is primarily due to an increase in product safety certification fees related to
product development.
Net loss for the first quarter ended June 30, 1999 was $578,000
compared to a net loss of $544,000 for the same period in the prior year. The
significant reasons for the increased loss are set forth in the foregoing
discussion.
8
<PAGE>
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
During the three months ended June 30, 1999, the Company used $118,000
in cash in operating activities. The major use of this cash is due to the net
loss from operations and increase in accounts receivable and decrease in
accounts payable offset in part by an increase in accrued liabilities, a
significant element of which is the accrued interest on outstanding loan
balances.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash used in investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal
year 2000 was $11,000 resulting from the purchase of equipment.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash provided in the first quarter of fiscal year 2000 from financing
activities was $81,000, resulting from a net increase in the related party
payable balances, which is due primarily to accrued interest on related party
loans to the Company.
For the quarter ended June 30, 1999, the Company used $57,000 in cash,
decreasing the $117,000 cash balance at the beginning of the period to $60,000
at June 30, 1999. At March 31, 2000 the Company had a cash balance of $249,000.
Outside of related party financing, the Company has identified no viable source
of financing. While current actions are being taken to implement a viable
operating plan to increase sales, renegotiate the terms of certain short-term
obligations with three Indian banks and raise additional capital, there can be
no assurance that any of these actions will be successfully completed.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Inapplicable.
9
<PAGE>
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
At June 30, 1999, the Company had outstanding amounts due to
four separate Indian lenders in the amount of $9,734,000, all
of which are currently in default because of nonpayment of
principal. Of that amount, three banks have issued notices to
the Company demanding immediate repayment of $8,741,000. At
March 31, 2000, the amount due to the banks was approximately
$9.5 million. The Company has insufficient funds available to
repay the banks. Because the Indian debt is secured by the
assets of Ultra Tek, alternatives available to the banks
include closing the operations of Ultra Tek and forcing Ultra
Tek into liquidation.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) EXHIBITS
Exhibit 27. Financial Data Sheet
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the
three month period ended June 30, 1999.
10
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
GOLDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
By: /s/ Jawahar L. Tandon
-------------------------
Jawahar L. Tandon
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT)
By: /s/ Harvey A. Marsh
-------------------------
Harvey A. Marsh
VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT)
Date: May 31, 2000
--------------------------------
11
