<PAGE> 1
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
---------------------
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ____________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-23012
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
---------------------
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
DELAWARE 84-1173453
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2860 WILDERNESS PLACE
BOULDER, COLORADO 80301
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
</TABLE>
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER: (303) 444-5893
---------------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
---------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the registrant, as of March 17, 1998, was $201,387,709.
The number of shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.01 per
share, outstanding as of March 17, 1998, was 27,489,951.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PART(S) INTO
DOCUMENT WHICH INCORPORATED
-------- ------------------
<S> <C>
Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the Annual Part III
Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 27, 1998 (the "Proxy
Statement"). With the exception of the pages of the Proxy
Statement specifically incorporated by reference herein, the
Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as a part of this
Form 10-K.
</TABLE>
================================================================================
<PAGE> 2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals" or the "Company"), is an integrated biopharmaceutical company
engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary
pharmaceutical products to treat life-threatening and other serious oncological,
hematological and infectious diseases. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals employs a broad
range of proprietary technologies in the discovery and formulation of
pharmaceutical products, including the Company's liposome drug delivery
technology; a powerful combinatorial chemistry technology, known as the SELEX
process, that rapidly identifies novel oligonucleotide compounds with potential
therapeutic and diagnostic benefits; and the Parallel SELEX process, designed to
rapidly discover small organic molecules to serve as orally available drugs. The
Company's technologies have produced two approved drugs and several drug
candidates that are in clinical or preclinical development and have provided the
basis for a significant pipeline of drug development candidates.
Currently, the Company markets AmBisome, an antifungal agent, and
DaunoXome, an anticancer drug, which had combined 1997 revenues of $89.2
million. On August 11, 1997, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved
AmBisome for use in the United States as a primary therapy for patients with a
low white blood cell count (febrile neutropenia) who have a presumed fungal
infection, also known as fever of unknown origin or FUO, or with visceral
leishmaniasis and as a secondary treatment for fungal infections that do not
respond to amphotericin B treatment. AmBisome has been approved for sale by the
regulatory authorities in 32 countries for the treatment of life-threatening
fungal infections, including 15 countries in which it has been approved as a
primary therapy for some form of fungal infection. DaunoXome has been approved
for sale as a primary therapy for HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma in 21
countries, including the United States, Canada and all significant Western
European markets. The Company is also conducting clinical trials with a third
product, the antibiotic MiKasome, a liposomal formulation of amikacin (a potent
aminoglycoside antibiotic). During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company began
a Phase II clinical study of MiKasome to assess its use in patients with
complicated urinary tract infections and is currently initiating a Phase II
clinical trial of MiKasome in adult patients with stable cystic fibrosis. The
Company plans to conduct additional Phase II clinical trials with MiKasome in
1998.
Each of AmBisome, DaunoXome and MiKasome was developed using the Company's
liposomal drug delivery technology. Liposomes are subcellular-sized spheres
composed primarily of molecules called phospholipids. By encapsulating in
liposomes certain drugs that in their free state are dosed at or close to toxic
levels, it is possible to increase the therapeutic index of the active drug
(i.e., to increase the efficacy of the active drug relative to the severity of
its side effects).
The Company utilizes two other powerful proprietary technologies for drug
discovery and delivery -- the SELEX process and the Parallel SELEX process. The
SELEX process, a combinatorial chemistry technology, can rapidly identify novel
oligonucleotide compounds (also referred to as aptamers) with a high affinity
for specified disease targets and therefore potential use as drug candidates or
as diagnostic agents.
The Company has discovered several aptamers using the SELEX process, which
are currently in the research and early preclinical/preclinical development
stages. In particular, the Company has identified a number of aptamer
antagonists to cancer and other disease causing growth factors, including
antagonists to vascular endothelial growth factor ("VEGF"). VEGF is believed to
contribute to disease progression, including age-related macular degeneration
("ARMD"), the leading cause of adult-onset blindness, by inducing the formation
of blood vessels associated with the disease state. Through the SELEX process,
the Company has also identified aptamers that recognize and inhibit the activity
of certain selectins (cell surface receptors thought to be involved in
inflammation and reperfusion injury), including a series of P-selectin aptamer
antagonists which in animal models have shown the ability to block cellular
processes that mediate
1
<PAGE> 3
inflammation. The Company anticipates filing an Investigational New Drug (IND)
application in the U.S. during 1998 for its aptamer antagonist to VEGF for the
treatment of the most severe form of ARMD.
The Company is developing a proprietary technology called Product Anchored
Sequential Synthesis ("PASS"), a method for synthesizing the oligonucleotides
that are the basis for the products being developed using the SELEX process. The
Company's PASS technology is expected to significantly lower the cost of
oligonucleotide compounds (fewer raw materials are needed) and improve the
chemical reactions needed to create these compounds. This technology is a
significant improvement over the traditional methods of making oligonucleotides
and adds to the Company's portfolio of proprietary technology for drug
development and delivery.
The Parallel SELEX process is a proprietary technology being developed by
the Company to rapidly identify small organic molecules intended to serve as
orally available drugs. The potential advantages of the Parallel SELEX process
are that, unlike current combinatorial chemistry drug discovery methodologies,
it does not require tagging chemistries, high reaction yields or laborious
screening steps.
To support its currently approved drugs and its drug discovery efforts, the
Company has developed a substantial marketing, manufacturing and
medical/regulatory infrastructure in the United States, Europe and Australia.
The Company does its own manufacturing of its liposomal drugs and is developing
the facilities necessary to manufacture any drugs which may be discovered using
the SELEX process. The Company markets its products through its own sales
representatives throughout Europe, in the United States (where the Company
co-markets AmBisome with Fujisawa USA, Inc.) and in Australia as well as through
third-party distributors. In particular, the Company has established marketing
subsidiaries in most of its significant European markets. The Company has built
and continues to enhance its medical/regulatory staff in the U.S. and Europe as
necessary to facilitate the approval of drug candidates which have been, or may
be, generated by the Company's drug discovery efforts.
In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company established a new business unit,
NeXstar Technology Products, to market specialty chemicals and process
technologies to enhance the research and development of biomacromolecules
(including oligonucleotides).
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals was formed in 1991 as NeXagen, Inc. On February 21,
1995, the Company was merged with Vestar, Inc., a Delaware corporation founded
in 1981, and changed its name to NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Report constitute "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of
the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, the
following: general economic and business conditions, including fluctuations in
currency exchange rates; reliance on a single product for a substantial portion
of the Company's revenues; competition; technological advances; ability to
obtain rights to technology; ability to obtain and enforce patents; ability to
commercialize and manufacture products; results of clinical studies; results of
research and development activities; availability of qualified personnel;
changes in, or failure to comply with, governmental regulations; ability to
obtain adequate financing in the future; and other factors referenced in this
Report. In particular, statements preceded by, followed by or that include the
words "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "plans," "intends," "scheduled" or
other similar expressions are or may constitute forward-looking statements. See
"Risk Factors" in Part II of this Report.
2
<PAGE> 4
PRODUCTS AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
The following table summarizes the principal products and certain product
development activities of the Company. Except as specifically noted below, all
commercial rights to such products are held exclusively by the Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRODUCT INDICATION STATUS
------- ---------- ------
<S> <C> <C>
LIPOSOMAL PRODUCTS
AmBisome* Systemic fungal infections Approved for marketing in 32
countries.
First line therapy for fungal infections Approved for marketing in 15
countries, including the U.S.
Treatment of fever of unknown origin (FUO) Approved for marketing in the U.S.
and Russia.
Prophylaxis in liver transplant patients Approved for marketing in four
countries.
Visceral leishmaniasis Approved for marketing in several
countries.
Histoplasmosis, Cryptococcus Phase III clinical trials ongoing
in the U.S.
DaunoXome First line therapy for advanced Kaposi's Approved for marketing in the
sarcoma U.S., Canada and 19 other
countries.
Multiple myeloma, leukemia, non-Hodgkin's Phase II clinical trials
lymphoma completed; preliminary results
are supportive.
Breast cancer Phase II clinical trials ongoing.
Sarcomas, cancers of the prostate and ovary Phase II clinical trials ongoing
as single agent and in
combination chemotherapy.
MiKasome Healthy volunteers Phase I clinical trials ongoing.
Complicated urinary tract infections, Phase II clinical trials ongoing.
cystic fibrosis
SELEX PROCESS-DERIVED
PRODUCTS
VEGF Antagonist Aptamers Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), Preclinical development;
cancer IND application scheduled
for ARMD for 1998.
P-Selectin Antagonist Transplants, post-stroke tissue damage Early preclinical development.
Aptamers
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* Fujisawa USA, Inc. ("Fujisawa") and the Company co-develop and co-promote
AmBisome in the United States pursuant to a collaborative relationship.
Fujisawa has sole marketing rights to AmBisome in Canada and the Company is
required to pay royalties to Fujisawa in connection with sales in most
significant Asian markets, including Japan. Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
has marketing rights to AmBisome in Japan.
PRODUCTS AND MARKETS
AMBISOME
AmBisome is a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B, a well-established
antifungal agent that is effective against a broad spectrum of fungi. NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals has received marketing approval for AmBisome as a treatment for
life-threatening fungal infections in 32 countries, 15 of which have granted
approval as a first line therapy for some form of fungal infection and the
remainder of which have granted
3
<PAGE> 5
approval for use when conventional amphotericin B treatment fails. AmBisome has
also been approved as a treatment for visceral leishmaniasis in several
countries and is approved in four countries for prophylactic treatment to
prevent fungal infection after liver transplantation. In addition, AmBisome has
been approved for the treatment of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in the U.S. and
Russia.
Pursuant to a collaborative agreement, the Company and Fujisawa USA, Inc.
("Fujisawa") co-develop and co-promote AmBisome in the United States. In
addition, Fujisawa has sole marketing rights to AmBisome in Canada and the
Company is required to pay royalties to Fujisawa in connection with sales in
most significant Asian markets, including Japan. In connection with U.S. sales,
Fujisawa receives all payments from the sale of AmBisome, but is required to
reimburse NeXstar Pharmaceuticals for the cost of producing the product and to
pay the Company 20% of the gross profits from all sales. The Company has also
licensed the rights to develop and market AmBisome in Japan to Sumitomo
Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo"). Under the terms of its license with the
Company, Sumitomo is required to make payments to the Company if certain
clinical and commercial milestones are met and to pay the Company royalties on
all Japanese sales of AmBisome. In March 1998, Sumitomo notified the Company
that all of the conditions necessary for the payment of a $3.0 million (less
taxes to be withheld of $300,000) milestone have been fulfilled. Under the terms
of the license, Sumitomo is also required to make a milestone payment to the
Company if AmBisome is approved for sale in Japan.
PRODUCT PROFILE. Amphotericin B, an antifungal agent used to treat a broad
spectrum of fungal infections, has been a commonly used drug for the treatment
of systemic fungal infections. The clinical usefulness of amphotericin B is
limited, however, because serious toxicity can occur prior to achieving
effective therapy. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has used its proprietary technology
to develop AmBisome, a liposomal product that incorporates amphotericin B. The
maximum tolerated dose of AmBisome in some animal models is up to 75 times that
of the free drug, permitting higher daily and cumulative doses of amphotericin B
to be delivered to the diseased tissues, while simultaneously greatly reducing
the normal acute and chronic toxicity often associated with conventional
amphotericin B therapy. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals believes that the increased
safety profile of AmBisome is due to a proprietary manufacturing process that
tightly binds amphotericin B into the membrane of the liposome, preventing the
free drug from escaping into the blood stream.
AmBisome is sold as a lyophilized (freeze-dried) product that is easily
reconstituted by adding sterilized water and has an approved shelf life in most
countries of 30 months. However, some countries, which originally approved
AmBisome with only a 12-month shelf life, have yet to approve the longer period.
MARKET. The Company's marketing efforts for AmBisome are primarily directed
at physicians who treat patients with systemic fungal infections and presumptive
fungal infections. Systemic fungal infections are serious infections with a
mortality rate of up to 70% and are commonly caused by species of Candida,
Aspergillus or Cryptococcus, as well as a variety of less common organisms.
These infections can occur in patients whose immune systems have been
compromised by other diseases or by the treatment of other medical conditions.
The largest population of immune-impaired patients consists of organ/bone marrow
transplant patients, heavily treated cancer patients (principally those with
leukemias or lymphomas) and AIDS patients. The product is also currently used in
a number of countries for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis, a parasitic
infection.
DAUNOXOME
DaunoXome is a liposomal formulation of daunorubicin, a well-characterized
and long-used chemotherapeutic agent. DaunoXome has been approved in the U.S.,
Canada and 19 other countries as a primary therapy for HIV-associated Kaposi's
sarcoma ("KS").
PRODUCT PROFILE. DaunoXome uses a proprietary tumor targeting technology
for delivering daunorubicin into tumor cells. This targeted liposomal delivery
system consists of small liposomes that encapsulate the daunorubicin in their
internal aqueous space. The size of the liposomes used in DaunoXome was
selected, in part, so that the liposomes can escape from circulation through the
more porous blood vessels that are generally found in tumors. In some animal
models, DaunoXome's formulation permits a concentration of the therapeutic agent
in tumors of 5 to 10 times the concentration achieved with intravenous
administration of the
4
<PAGE> 6
free drug. The same animal tests have also demonstrated up to 10 times the
efficacy as the equivalent level of daunorubicin in its free drug form. Further,
these animal models have demonstrated a substantial reduction in certain
toxicities associated with daunorubicin. DaunoXome has an approved shelf life of
52 weeks in the United States and 40 weeks in Canada and most European
countries.
MARKET. The Company's initial targeted market for DaunoXome has been AIDS
patients who suffer from KS, a malignant disease characterized by widely
disseminated lesions in the skin, mucous membranes, lymph nodes and viscera.
With the advent of combination therapies for AIDS, the incidence of KS has
declined in recent years which has substantially limited the market for the
indication for which DaunoXome has been approved.
CLINICAL TRIALS, PRECLINICAL TRIALS AND REGULATORY STATUS
The Company is continuing clinical trials for both AmBisome and DaunoXome
for currently approved and additional indications and has another liposomal
product (MiKasome) in clinical trials. The Company anticipates filing an
Investigational New Drug ("IND") application in the U.S. during 1998 for its
aptamer antagonist to VEGF for the treatment of age-related macular
degeneration. This will be the first time that an IND application has been filed
for one of the Company's aptamers. No assurance can be given that proposed
clinical trials will be initiated or that any clinical trials or preclinical
development work will result in any commercially successful new drugs or
approval of any additional indications for AmBisome or DaunoXome.
AMBISOME
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals continues to conduct clinical trials with AmBisome
in a variety of settings with the aim of expanding the uses of this antifungal
drug. The Company has recently concentrated its clinical development of AmBisome
on empiric therapy for presumed fungal infections among patients at high risk
for such infections, first line therapy of systemic and/or deep fungal
infections and prophylaxis against systemic fungal infections following
chemotherapy and in patients receiving bone marrow transplantation.
In a double-blind trial, 687 adult and pediatric patients with neutropenia
(a low number of infection-fighting white blood cells) and persistent fever that
did not resolve with antibiotic treatment were randomized to receive either
conventional amphotericin B or AmBisome. Results of the study, which Fujisawa
sponsored, show that overall AmBisome was associated with a therapeutic success
rate (measured by a combination of factors including, among others, resolution
of fever, absence of emergent fungal infection and patient survival for at least
seven days after therapy) equivalent to conventional amphotericin B, but was
significantly more effective in the prevention of proven breakthrough fungal
infections. In addition, among patients treated with AmBisome compared with
patients treated with conventional amphotericin B, there was a significant
reduction in the incidence of infusion-related fever, chills/rigors,
cardiorespiratory events and the development of nephrotoxicity. Patients treated
with amphotericin B had a slightly lower incidence of diarrhea and nausea than
those treated with AmBisome. The study also indicated that there was a
statistically significant reduction in kidney toxicity with AmBisome compared to
conventional amphotericin B. Overall, there was a lower incidence of adverse
events associated with the use of AmBisome as compared to amphotericin B.
The Company has completed two additional randomized open label clinical
trials comparing the safety and efficacy of AmBisome to conventional
amphotericin B in the empiric treatment of patients with fever of unknown origin
(FUO) and severe neutropenia who have a presumed fungal infection. These
patients were receiving intensive chemotherapy or had underlying hematological
disease. One clinical trial enrolled adults (134 patients) and the other
pediatric subjects (214 patients). These two clinical trials indicated that
AmBisome had an improved safety profile compared with amphotericin B and there
was a trend towards improved efficacy for AmBisome, specifically for the higher
dose group (3 mg/kg).
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 85
patients studying the efficacy and safety of AmBisome as prophylaxis following
liver transplantation showed a trend towards improved efficacy for AmBisome
compared to amphotericin B. Additionally, the Company has completed five
clinical trials in which patients with confirmed systemic and/or deep fungal
infections were treated with AmBisome. In these
5
<PAGE> 7
trials, AmBisome was clinically at least as effective as amphotericin B and the
overall fungal eradication rate was greater for AmBisome than for amphotericin
B.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, in conjunction with Fujisawa, is conducting two
Phase III clinical trials of AmBisome in the U.S. for the treatment of
histoplasmosis and for the treatment of Cryptococcus. The trial for
histoplasmosis is being monitored and analyzed by the Mycology Study Group of
the National Institutes of Health.
DAUNOXOME
The Company is seeking to expand the number of approved indications for
DaunoXome. The Company has completed clinical trials and is continuing to
perform additional studies aimed at optimizing the treatment of KS. The
completed clinical trials in KS have evaluated the safety and efficacy of higher
dose regimens and the treatment of the pulmonary manifestations of KS.
In addition, the Company is pursuing a strategy of evaluating the
therapeutic potential of DaunoXome in hematological malignancies (leukemias and
lymphomas), indications in which the efficacy and safety of daunorubicin is well
established. The Company, in a Phase II clinical trial, has substituted
DaunoXome for doxorubicin in a CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine
and prednisone) regimen (COP-X) in the treatment of high grade lymphomas. The
Company is also pursuing a Phase I study in acute myeloblastic leukemia in
combination with cytosine-arabinoside (Ara-C).
Although initial indications are that DaunoXome may not be universally
effective against solid tumors, the Company is conducting Phase II clinical
trials with DaunoXome to evaluate its efficiency in a range of selected tumors,
including sarcomas and cancers of the breast, prostate and ovary. The Company is
also investigating the efficacy of, and tolerance to, DaunoXome in combination
with other cytotoxic agents such as Taxol, 5FU and cyclophosphamide. The Company
is currently supporting the study of DaunoXome by numerous clinical
investigators.
MIKASOME
MiKasome is a liposomal formulation of amikacin, which is a member of a
class of antibiotic compounds called aminoglycosides. Traditionally, serious
bacterial infections are treated with an injectable antibiotic such as amikacin.
In its free (unencapsulated) form, amikacin is a potent antibiotic, but can be
associated with side effects such as kidney failure, hearing loss or loss of
balance. The target product profile for MiKasome, as compared to free amikacin,
includes significantly improved safety, extended circulation times, increased
penetration to sites of infection and a broader range of antimicrobial activity.
The Company began an initial 30-patient Phase II study of MiKasome in
November 1997 to assess its use in patients with complicated urinary tract
infections ("UTI's"). Complicated UTI's are functional or anatomic abnormalities
of the urinary tract often resulting in recurrent infections in patients despite
antibiotic therapy. The Company is also initiating a Phase II clinical trial of
MiKasome in adult patients with stable cystic fibrosis. The Company plans to
conduct two additional Phase II clinical trials during 1998 in hospital-
acquired pneumonia.
Phase I studies using MiKasome have indicated that (i) at the doses
studied, MiKasome did not cause toxicity or impairment to the kidneys, to
hearing or to balance; (ii) the half-life (an indication of the time the product
stays in the body) is up to seven days, compared to approximately two hours for
free amikacin; and (iii) relatively constant antibiotic levels appear to be
maintained with once weekly dosing of MiKasome.
Preclinical studies with MiKasome in animals have indicated that (i)
MiKasome has a much longer half-life than free amikacin; (ii) MiKasome
administered daily was as effective as free amikacin administered twice a day in
the treatment of endocarditis caused by Pseudomonas, a gram-negative bacteria;
and (iii) MiKasome was more effective than free amikacin in decreasing the
incidence and severity of myocarditis (inflammation of the muscular walls of the
heart).
6
<PAGE> 8
In preclinical studies, the pathogens against which MiKasome has shown at
least equivalent, if not improved efficacy compared to free amikacin, are
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
The current development plan for MiKasome includes clinical trials for
indications in patients with moderate, severe and life-threatening gram-negative
bacterial infections, including, but not limited to, those infections which are
the focus of the planned, or currently conducted, Phase II clinical trials
(complicated UTI's, pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis,
hospital-acquired pneumonia and bacterial endocarditis), as well as
intra-abdominal infections, osteomyelitis and febrile neutropenia.
GROWTH FACTOR ANTAGONISTS
Using its proprietary SELEX process (See "-- Research and
Development -- SELEX: Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential
Enrichment -- Overview"), the Company has identified numerous aptamer
antagonists of growth factors. Growth factors are proteins capable of
stimulating the growth of various cells and tissues, including tumors and blood
vessels. The Company is currently developing aptamer antagonists of several
growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor ("VEGF") and
platelet-derived growth factor ("PDGF").
VEGF APTAMERS. VEGF is a growth factor that promotes the growth of new
blood vessels (a process known as angiogenesis). In healthy adults, angiogenesis
is rare and tightly controlled. However, in certain pathological conditions,
such as age-related macular degeneration ("ARMD") and cancer, angiogenesis is
believed to contribute to disease progression. Using its SELEX process, the
Company has identified several aptamers that bind to VEGF very tightly, in a
manner that inhibits the binding of VEGF to its cell surface receptors,
therefore assisting in inhibiting angiogenesis and impairing tumor growth. The
Company has developed VEGF antagonist aptamers with improved pharmacokinetic
properties and is currently testing these aptamers in animal models of
angiogenesis and tumor growth.
In ARMD, blood vessels grow in an abnormal manner behind the retina,
resulting in a progressive loss of visual acuity and eventual blindness.
Currently, there is no effective treatment for ARMD, which is the leading cause
of adult-onset blindness in developed countries. ARMD is classified into one of
two general subgroups, the atrophic or "dry" form and the exudative or "wet"
form. The "wet" form accounts for approximately 20% of all ARMD cases in the
U.S., but is the more severe condition in which there may be a sudden, often
substantial, loss of central vision. In some European countries, the percentage
of ARMD cases that are the "wet" form is significantly higher than in the United
States. Evidence is accumulating to implicate VEGF as the principal angiogenic
growth factor contributing to the pathology of "wet" ARMD. If VEGF is a key
mediator in the initial stages of the "wet" form of ARMD, then its inhibition
should have an impact on the onset and/or severity of vision loss. The Company
has developed an aptamer which, when administered systemically to rats (whose
VEGF is substantially equivalent to human VEGF), resulted in the significant
inhibition of VEGF-dependent angiogenesis in the corneal tissue of the eye.
Other tests in animals have indicated that the Company's aptamer was effective
in inhibiting VEGF. The Company's initial data indicate that its aptamer may be
effective in inhibiting VEGF if dosed as infrequently as once a month. As a
result of its successes in animal trials, the Company anticipates filing an
Investigational New Drug ("IND") application in the U.S. during 1998 for its
VEGF antagonist aptamer for the treatment of ARMD. This will be the first time
that an IND application has been filed for one of the Company's aptamers.
In cancer, it is now well established that in order for tumors to grow
beyond the size of a few cubic millimeters and to disseminate, there must be
simultaneous growth of blood vessels. Inhibitors of angiogenesis (including
inhibitors of VEGF) may impair tumor growth. In preclinical models,
Company-developed aptamers have inhibited the growth of human KS tumors and
human rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft tumors in nude mice. Additional preclinical
studies are ongoing in conjunction with cytotoxic agents.
PDGF APTAMER. PDGF promotes the growth of many cells and tissues. Like
VEGF, PDGF promotes tumor growth by causing angiogenesis associated with tumors.
In addition, and as a consequence of the expression of PDGF receptors on tumor
cells, PDGF can be directly responsible for stimulation of tumor cell growth.
PDGF appears to be a causative factor in certain types of cancer and other
proliferative diseases such
7
<PAGE> 9
as restenosis and fibrosis. Using its SELEX process, the Company has identified
a specific PDGF binding aptamer that potently inhibits PDGF activity in vitro.
The Company is currently testing this PDGF aptamer in animal models of
restenosis, fibrosis, cancer and angiogenesis. The results from these animal
model studies have been encouraging.
SELECTIN ANTAGONISTS
Using its proprietary SELEX process, the Company has identified aptamers
which inhibit certain selectin mediated activity in vivo. Selectins are a family
of three closely related cell surface receptors that mediate adhesion between
different types of cells. In both normal and disease states the selectins
participate in the movement (extravasation) of white blood cells from the blood
stream into tissues. Because the extravasation of white blood cells into certain
types of tissue may, if uncontrolled, lead to host tissue damage, selectins are
thought to play an important role in inflammation and reperfusion injury
(inflammation is a natural response to injury; however, if uncontrolled, it can
produce reactions which are life threatening). In certain circumstances, such as
severe trauma and coronary bypass surgery, experimental evidence supports the
theory that white blood cells are involved in much of the cell injury that can
trigger multi-organ failure. It is believed that if the attraction of white
blood cells to injury sites can be blocked, or at least reduced, by inhibiting
the activity of the selectins involved in the extravasation of white blood cells
into the injury site, the adverse reactions which lead to cell death and organ
failure might be prevented. The Company is currently focusing efforts on its
P-selectin antagonist, which is in the early preclinical development stage.
P-SELECTIN APTAMERS. P-selectin plays a significant role in the movement of
white blood cells from the blood stream into tissue and is thought to be
involved in the early stages of inflammation. Using its SELEX process, the
Company has identified a series of aptamer antagonists of P-selectin. The
Company has conducted in vitro experiments that have shown that these P-selectin
antagonist aptamers have binding affinities for P-selectin that are far greater
than carbohydrate-based antagonists and that block P-selectin mediated cell-cell
adhesion. The Company is using animal models to evaluate the in vivo activity of
these P-selectin antagonist aptamers, which have shown the ability to block
cellular processes that mediate inflammation. The primary clinical indications
for the Company's P-selectin antagonist aptamers are initially expected to be in
connection with lung transplants and tissue reperfusion injury after a cerebral
ischemic event (stroke).
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company focuses its research and development activities on its three
significant proprietary technologies (the SELEX process, the Parallel SELEX
process and the Company's liposome drug discovery technology), on the
identification through these platform technologies of potential drug candidates
and on the development of the most suitable candidates into oncological,
hematological and infectious disease drugs. In addition, the Company is pursuing
the development of SELEX process-derived oligonucleotide compounds as
non-therapeutic products, including diagnostic agents. The Company also conducts
research involving additional technologies developed by the Company, such as the
Company's nucleic acid detection assay and its homocysteine assay. The Company
devotes significant efforts to the efficient development of the oligonucleotide
compounds that are the basis for the products being developed by the Company
using the SELEX process, including the development of the Company's Product
Anchored Sequential Synthesis (PASS) technology.
SELEX: SYSTEMATIC EVOLUTION OF LIGANDS BY EXPONENTIAL ENRICHMENT -- OVERVIEW
Drug discovery efforts focus on the identification of compounds that can
bind and inhibit molecular targets that cause disease. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals
has developed and patented a proprietary combinatorial chemistry technology
called the SELEX process and is utilizing this process to rapidly identify
compounds that bind tightly and selectively to molecular (i.e., disease)
targets.
Complementary shape (sometimes described as a "lock and key") is
fundamental to drug discovery research. In searching for potential drug
candidates, the scientist is looking for the drug candidate (key) that
8
<PAGE> 10
best fits the disease causing molecular target (lock). In this search, it is
advantageous to have a large library of potential drug candidates (keys) to test
against the target molecule (to attempt to fit into the lock). In developing
effective drug products, it is also advantageous to have a drug candidate that
binds tightly to the target molecule and not to other molecules. A drug compound
with high affinity binding properties is more likely to be effective at low
doses and induce fewer side effects than a drug compound with low affinity for
the disease target; high specificity also reduces the likelihood of potential
side effects since the drug compound is unlikely to interact with targets not
involved in the particular disease. The SELEX process generates an enormous
library of oligonucleotide compounds (keys) and then rapidly searches this
library of compounds to identify the compounds that bind tightly and with a high
degree of specificity to the chosen disease-causing molecular target.
The SELEX process can be used to screen a pool of up to one million billion
oligonucleotides and to select from this pool the compounds that have the
highest affinity for a specified molecular target. The SELEX process begins by
creating in a test tube a pool containing a million billion candidate
oligonucleotides (molecules belonging to the same family as DNA and RNA, but
modified to resist degradation by DNA- and RNA-destroying enzymes). When this
pool is mixed with a molecular (i.e., disease) target whose biological activity
is to be altered or inhibited, a small subset of the larger pool binds to this
target. The oligonucleotides in this smaller subset are then amplified. The new
copies of the surviving candidates form an enriched pool containing more high
affinity oligonucleotides than the prior pool. This second generation pool is
again exposed to the molecular/disease target and those oligonucleotides with
the best binding properties are again selected and amplified. These steps of
binding, selection and amplification are repeated several times with each round
of the SELEX process generating a smaller pool of oligonucleotides that bind to
the target molecule with increasing specificity and affinity. Typically, the
SELEX process creates drug candidates in a matter of weeks or months. The lead
oligonucleotide compound resulting from the application of the SELEX process to
a particular disease target is sometimes referred to as an aptamer.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has demonstrated that the SELEX process is
applicable to a broad range of molecular targets, including proteins, peptides,
organic compounds, lipids, polysaccharides, carbohydrates, glycoproteins,
hormones, receptors, growth factors, whole cells and tissue.
The Company believes that its SELEX process technology has certain
advantages over existing drug discovery technologies, including the creation of
large libraries of oligonucleotide compounds, rapid identification of lead
compounds, high affinity and high specificity of target recognition and lack of
requirement of knowledge of the target molecule's structure. As a result, the
Company believes that its SELEX process technology reduces the time and cost
involved in identifying lead compounds and ultimately will reduce the time and
cost involved in discovering and developing effective pharmaceutical products.
SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES WITH SELEX PROCESS-DERIVED APTAMERS
The Company has made significant progress in improving the stability and
the pharmacokinetic activity of aptamers which are being developed using the
SELEX process. In addition, the Company is in the process of automating the
SELEX process. Automation has the potential of substantially increasing the
speed with which the Company can identify aptamers.
STABILITY. A major challenge to the development of SELEX process-derived
aptamers as drug candidates has been the rapid clearance of the drug from the
body due to enzymatic degradation. In living systems, there are families of
nucleic acid destroying enzymes, called nucleases, which attack and break down
RNA and DNA molecules. This activity of nucleases (i.e., degradation of the RNA-
or DNA-based drug product) leads to clearance of the drug from the body and
therefore, in many cases, ineffectiveness of the drug. The Company has focused
its stability enhancement efforts on making its RNA-based aptamers resistant to
degradation. To this end, the Company has created an assortment of proprietary
nucleotides (the building blocks for RNA and DNA), modified at the primary point
of entry of the nuclease attack. Compared to natural RNA, the SELEX
process-derived RNA (modified) aptamers have now been shown to be up to 200
times more stable in the blood of test animals. These advances have given the
Company the ability to achieve an array of circulation times for its aptamers to
match the circulation time best suited for the specific disease target. Using
its
9
<PAGE> 11
modified aptamers, the Company has demonstrated specific pharmacologic activity
in animal models representing different types of simulated disease processes.
PHARMACOKINETICS. A second major challenge to the development of SELEX
process-derived aptamers as drug candidates is the rapid clearance of the drug
from the body due to excretion by the kidneys. The Company has achieved improved
pharmacokinetic performance of SELEX process-derived aptamers through a variety
of formulation modifications which alter the size of the aptamers and therefore
alter the circulation time of the drug products (the rate of kidney excretion
is, among other things, dependent on the size of the drug molecule). The
formulation modifications to the aptamers are, for the most part, made after
completion of the SELEX process and alter the size (and weight) of the aptamers.
The increased size and weight of the modified aptamers reduce the rate at which
they are cleared from circulation, primarily by blocking filtration of the
aptamers by the kidneys.
The Company has anchored aptamers into liposomes using the Company's
proprietary liposomal technology. This liposomal anchoring of SELEX
process-derived aptamers also has improved the pharmacokinetic performance of
aptamers and has contributed to the enhanced activity of the aptamers in animal
models.
The Company will continue to study the behavior of aptamers in the body and
will continue its attempts to engineer aptamers so that they will be cleared at
rates that are desirable for different medical applications.
AUTOMATION. Currently, much of the SELEX process is labor intensive. By
automating the SELEX process, the Company believes that it will increase the
speed at which it is able to identify aptamers. The Company's automation efforts
have focused on developing an automatable platform for the SELEX process and
designing a robotics system to automate the enzymatic steps of the SELEX
process. During 1997, the Company demonstrated the feasibility of its robotics
system and made significant progress in achieving an automatable platform.
THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS OF SELEX PROCESS-DERIVED COMPOUNDS
DISEASES IMPACTED BY GROWTH FACTORS. Growth factors are proteins capable of
stimulating the growth of various cells and tissues, including tumors and blood
vessels. Using its SELEX process, the Company has identified several aptamers
that bind to VEGF very tightly, in a manner that inhibits the binding of VEGF to
its cell surface receptor and therefore assists in the inhibition of
angiogenesis in tumor and ocular settings and assists in the impairment of tumor
growth. Using its SELEX process, the Company has also identified a specific PDGF
aptamer that potently inhibits PDGF activity in vitro and has the potential to
inhibit tumor growth and the progression of other proliferative diseases such as
restenosis and fibrosis. See "-- Clinical Trials, Preclinical Trials and
Regulatory Status." The Company is also conducting research on other growth
factors implicated in various disease states. The Company has identified
antagonists to basic Fibroplast Growth Factor (bFGF) (implicated in restenosis,
fibrosis and cancer), Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF beta) (believed to
play a role in restenosis, fibrosis and cancer) and Keratinocyte Growth Factor
(KGF) (involved in certain skin related cancers and psoriasis). The Company is
continuing to test and develop these growth factor antagonists.
SELECTINS. Selectins are cell surface receptors that mediate adhesion
between different types of cells. In both normal and disease states selectins
participate in the movement (extravasation) of white blood cells from the blood
stream into tissues. Because the extravasation of white blood cells into certain
types of tissue may, if uncontrolled, lead to host tissue damage, selectins are
thought to play an important role in inflammation and reperfusion injury. Using
its SELEX process, the Company has identified aptamer antagonists of P-selectin.
The results of experiments with these antagonists suggest that in inflammatory
reactions P-selectin mediated white blood cell migration may be blocked by the
Company's aptamers, preventing life-threatening inflammation and reperfusion
injury. See "-- Clinical Trials, Preclinical Trials and Regulatory Status."
HUMAN NEUTROPHIL ELASTASE. Human neutrophil elastase ("hNE") is a protease
(enzyme) that is capable of degrading a wide variety of connective tissue
proteins. Because of its potentially destructive effects, hNE activity is
tightly controlled or regulated under normal circumstances. The failure of the
body to regulate
10
<PAGE> 12
hNE is thought to be a major factor in inflammation. Excessive hNE activity has
been implicated in emphysema, cystic fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and
ischemia-reperfusion injury. It is thought that an effective hNE inhibitor could
significantly reduce inflammation and subsequent tissue damage thought to be
impacted by hNE activity.
Using a variation on the SELEX process called a blended SELEX process (a
small organic molecule is linked to a SELEX process library), the Company has
isolated irreversible inhibitors of hNE that are faster acting and more potent
than any other inhibitors of hNE described in the scientific literature. In
preclinical studies, researchers have used a Company developed aptamer as an hNE
inhibitor to reduce damage to the lungs in animals undergoing an inflammatory
attack. The studies targeted animal models for Acute Respiratory Distress
Syndrome (ARDS), a disease that threatens the lives of approximately 150,000
Americans annually and for which there is no effective treatment. NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals' aptamer was shown to block the action of hNE in the body and
reduce lung damage. In addition, the research showed that the Company's aptamer
prevented white blood cells from further infiltration of the lungs, which may
help break the disease cycle.
COMPLEMENT C5. Complement C5 is a protein which circulates in the blood as
an inactive precursor molecule that is believed to be the most important central
branch point in the complement cascade, an important component of the immune
system. As part of the overall host resistance/inflammation system in mammals,
the C5 protein is cleaved following complement activation by infectious agents,
hypoxia or trauma to form two highly reactive subunits, C5a and C5b. These
subunits are capable of amplifying the inflammatory response through two
different mechanisms. C5a is capable of attracting white blood cells which
migrate to the sight of inflammation to kill invading microorganisms, but which
also can kill normal body tissues. C5b initiates a chain reaction of additional
complement component proteins which form killer complexes on the surface of
foreign cells or cells of the body's own tissues resulting in cell death. This
intrinsic host defense system must be operative in people and animals in order
for them to survive continuous exposure to microbes and other invasive matter.
However, the system is often activated non-specifically in a variety of diseases
and medical situations in which it becomes detrimental to the patient by causing
excessive tissue damage. Such conditions include organ transplant rejection,
asthma, rheumatoid arthritis and reperfusion injury situations following acute
intervention in stroke and myocardial infarction.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has identified an aptamer which has been shown to
bind with high affinity to human Complement C5 and inhibit its proteolytic
cleavage. The inhibition of this cleavage reaction has been demonstrated to
reduce the complement system's ability to destroy normal cells by 80-90%. This
aptamer and a similar one directed against rat Complement C5 are in early
preclinical studies. The anti-human C5 aptamer is expected to be initially
targeted against reperfusion injury/acute tissue damage settings in an effort to
significantly reduce secondary tissue damage, thereby salvaging normal tissue
surrounding an injury site. The ultimate outcome, if successful, will be to help
patients recover faster and retain more functional activity in affected organs.
IN VIVO SELEX PROCESS
The Company has extended its SELEX process to identify aptamers that bind
to complex targets in vivo, i.e., instead of using its SELEX process to target
disease molecules in vitro, the Company is using this in vivo SELEX process to
target diseased or damaged tissue such as arterial plaque or malignant tumors in
living animals and in human tissue. The aptamers obtained by the Company from
the in vivo SELEX process are useful as specific in vivo imaging agents (in vivo
imaging agents are the subject of a collaboration between the Company and
Schering A.G. See "-- Collaborative Relationships and License Agreements").
A demonstration of the in vivo SELEX process has been made in an animal
model of restenosis following balloon angioplasty. In this demonstration, the
Company used the in vivo SELEX process to target an isolated, damaged artery.
After identification and enrichment of those aptamers having the highest
affinity for the target, the aptamer pool was injected into an animal with the
damaged artery. This demonstration eventually led to identification of an
aptamer with high affinity and greater than ten-fold specificity for the damaged
artery, results consistent with requirements for in vivo imaging agents.
11
<PAGE> 13
The Company is extending its in vivo SELEX process in an effort to identify
aptamers against human atherosclerotic plaque (hardening of the arteries) and to
develop aptamers for in vivo diagnosis and for the treatment of various human
cancers.
DIAGNOSTIC APPLICATIONS OF SELEX PROCESS-DERIVED COMPOUNDS
In addition to efforts aimed at the potential use of SELEX process-derived
products as therapeutic targets, the Company has devoted significant research
and development efforts to demonstrating that products derived from its SELEX
process have utility as diagnostic agents.
TAQ (THERMUS AQUATICAS) POLYMERASE APTAMERS. The development of the
polymerase chain reaction ("PCR") has revolutionized many aspects of modern
molecular biology. PCR allows the rapid and efficient amplification of specific
sequence DNA molecules. The molecule responsible for PCR is the thermostable DNA
polymerase enzyme Taq polymerase. While the utility of PCR is high, it is also
flawed (it can function at low temperatures, allowing the DNA primers to
non-specifically bind to each other and to the target DNA molecule to be
amplified, resulting in undesirable amplification of DNA and making
interpretation of the PCR results difficult).
In collaboration with Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals has identified SELEX process-derived DNA aptamers that bind to
Taq polymerase and inhibit its activity at low temperatures where the
non-specific binding problem described above occurs. At low temperatures (where
non-specific primer binding is problematic), the DNA aptamers bind to Taq
polymerase and prevent it from undesirable DNA amplification. At high
temperatures (where primer binding is highly specific for the DNA to be
amplified and where Taq polymerase functions in the manner desired), the DNA
aptamers, by design, no longer bind and inhibit Taq polymerase, allowing this
enzyme to amplify only the desired DNA target. The Company's DNA aptamers have
indicated that they have substantial advantages compared to traditional PCR
applications, especially in clinical diagnostics.
APTAMERS AS DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS. Using its SELEX process, the Company has
identified aptamers that can be used for diagnostic applications. For example,
the Company has demonstrated that a SELEX process-derived aptamer that binds to
VEGF can be used in place of an antibody in a diagnostic assay commonly used in
the clinical laboratory. The common diagnostic assay used in this demonstration
is known as a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and usually
requires two antibodies that bind simultaneously to the molecule to be assayed.
The first antibody captures the target and the second antibody is used for
detection (the two antibodies are thought of as two pieces of bread that
"sandwich" the target molecule). The use of two antibodies greatly reduces the
probability of misdiagnosis. In the Company's demonstration, the detection
antibody in the diagnostic assay was replaced with a SELEX process-derived
aptamer specific for VEGF. The demonstration indicated that SELEX
process-derived aptamers may be effective and useful diagnostic reagents.
SELEX process-derived aptamers may have several advantages over antibodies
for use as clinical diagnostic reagents, including: aptamers are approximately
ten times smaller than antibodies and are completely chemically defined
(allowing for consistent manufacturing and ease of modification); "rational"
design is possible with aptamers, i.e., the SELEX process can be designed so
that the resulting aptamer is capable of binding to the target molecule in the
desired assay solution or with the desired target specificity; and, because the
entire SELEX process is in vitro, aptamers can be developed for most targets,
including those for which it is difficult to obtain antibodies. The Company also
believes that it will be able to use its Product Anchored Sequential Synthesis
("PASS") technology for large-scale manufacture of these aptamers at a cost that
is substantially less than the current cost to produce most antibodies. See
"-- Research and Development -- PASS: Product Anchored Sequential Synthesis."
OTHER APPLICATIONS. The Company is continuing to explore the development of
SELEX process-derived aptamers for a wide range of in vitro diagnostic
applications. The Company also is continuing research on the use of its in vivo
SELEX process to develop aptamers for use as in vivo imaging agents. See
"-- Research and Development -- In Vivo SELEX Process."
12
<PAGE> 14
APPLICATIONS OF SELEX-DERIVED COMPOUNDS AS PURIFICATION REAGENTS
Monoclonal antibody technology has made immunoaffinity purification a
powerful and routine laboratory technique. With proper experimentation, 1,000 to
10,000-fold purifications can routinely be achieved from complex mixtures.
However, there are major constraints that reduce the effectiveness of
antibody-based purifications, especially for large-scale or industrial
applications, including: antibody cross-reactivity; linkage of antibodies to
columns that often results in couplings that are not uniform, leading to reduced
capacity; inability of antibodies to survive cleaning; harsh elution conditions
(leading sometimes to destruction of the purified target, as well as the
antibody); and difficulty of large-scale manufacturing of monoclonal antibodies.
To alleviate the problems associated with monoclonal antibody affinity
purification, scientists are exploring alternative affinity purification
reagents created through combinatorial chemistry technologies. The new reagents
being developed are generally smaller in size and complexity than antibodies,
easier to manufacture, offer gentler elution schemes and are generally more
resistant to sanitation procedures.
Using its SELEX process, the Company is developing an alternative affinity
purification reagent, specifically, aptamers for the purification of target
molecules from complex mixtures. Preliminary results indicate that the Company's
aptamers can be as effective as antibodies in their ability to purify target
molecules from complex mixtures (1,500 to 4,500-fold purifications) and these
aptamers are currently being used for protein purifications required for the
Company's own research efforts. On a larger scale, the Company believes that its
PASS technology may allow for the inexpensive, large-scale manufacturing of
aptamer affinity reagents and therefore potential commercialization of these
aptamers.
PASS: PRODUCT ANCHORED SEQUENTIAL SYNTHESIS
All products produced by the SELEX process are oligonucleotide based. An
oligonucleotide is a chain of nucleotides (or monomers). During the SELEX
process, billions of oligonucleotides are put through the repeated steps of
binding, selection and amplification. The lead oligonucleotide compound
resulting from the application of the SELEX process to a particular disease
target is sometimes referred to as an aptamer.
Traditional methods for the manufacture of oligonucleotides are suitable
for research-scale production of these compounds, but are severely limited for
larger-scale or commercial production. Limitations to traditional manufacturing
methods include: the solid phase synthetic methods used are not capable of scale
up in a predictable fashion; the adaptation of traditional manufacturing methods
to a particular oligonucleotide (aptamer) is laborious and costly; and the crude
product which results from traditional manufacturing methods is contaminated and
requires further purification.
The Company is developing a proprietary technology called Product Anchored
Sequential Synthesis ("PASS"), which is a new method for synthesizing
oligonucleotides (including aptamers). The PASS technology allows for
predictable scale-up of oligonucleotide products, using conventional chemical
engineering techniques. The PASS technology improves the economics of
oligonucleotide synthesis in several ways. The PASS technology uses fewer
(costly) monomers in each step needed to construct an oligonucleotide chain. The
PASS technology also reduces purification costs associated with oligonucleotide
synthesis as a result of the removal of contaminants, using a proprietary
product anchoring process, after each monomer is added to the chain. The PASS
technology also uses chemical activators to speed up the chemical reactions that
assemble monomers into a chain (the use of these chemical activators is
proprietary to the Company). In addition, the in-process controls and
documentation of PASS-manufactured oligonucleotides (not present with
traditional manufacturing methods) are believed to be another advantage of this
process and may prove beneficial in obtaining regulatory approval for
oligonucleotide-based products.
The Company's PASS technology is expected to add to the Company's ability
to make oligonucleotide-based drugs in commercial quantities in a predictable
and cost-effective manner. In addition, the PASS technology may be adaptable to
the production of other polymeric compounds, peptides, peptide nucleic acids,
polysaccharides and carbohydrates. The PASS technology is being developed by the
Company's newly formed business unit, NeXstar Technology Products. See
"-- NeXstar Technology Products."
13
<PAGE> 15
PARALLEL SELEX PROCESS
The Parallel SELEX process is a proprietary process being developed by the
Company to discover small-molecule drug candidates. The potential advantages of
the Parallel SELEX process as compared to current combinatorial chemistry drug
discovery methodologies are several, including: tagging chemistries are not
necessary; high reaction yields are not required, so that both known and unknown
reaction chemistries (with numerous regiochemical and stereochemical outcomes)
currently inaccessible with combinatorial chemistry can be utilized to provide
extensive small-molecule libraries; and laborious and database-intensive
screening steps common in other combinatorial chemistry approaches are avoided.
The focus of research efforts of the Parallel SELEX process group at the
Company has been to expand the repertoire of reactions that may be used to form
chemically diverse small-molecule libraries. The Company's discoveries indicate
the potential of developing nucleic acid-synthesized small-molecule
pharmaceutical candidates. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals' scientists have shown that
RNA is capable of catalyzing a carbon-carbon bond-forming reaction important for
the assembly of many pharmacophore compounds. In these experiments, modified
RNAs, which are proprietary to the Company, were used to facilitate the Diels-
Alder reaction, a highly valued organic transformation. The Company also used
modified RNA to promote the formation of an amide bond, another reaction
commonly used in the assembly of drug candidates. These results indicate that
RNA molecules form catalytic binding pockets similar to protein enzymes. The
Diels-Alder and amide bond formation reactions represent only a subset of
possibly useful reactions for the assembly of drug candidates, and further
efforts to prove the applicability of the Parallel SELEX process methodology to
other classes of reactions, especially those with diverse regiochemical and
stereochemical possibilities, are ongoing.
The Company's Parallel SELEX group will continue to utilize nucleic acids
to catalyze reactions in an effort to (i) produce molecules that are difficult
to obtain using current combinatorial chemistry techniques, (ii) significantly
reduce costs of pharmaceutical discovery and development and (iii) develop lead
compounds and products with potentially improved pharmacokinetics. The Company
continues to expand the chemistries available for drug discovery using the
Parallel SELEX process and is constructing small-molecule libraries for the
discovery of new orally available pharmaceuticals to treat oncological and
infectious diseases.
LIPOSOME TECHNOLOGY
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals believes that it has substantial technological
strengths in the development of liposome products. The Company's proprietary
liposome drug delivery technology enables it to develop products with
significant advantages over intravenous administration of a conventional drug,
including concentrating the drug on the targeted disease, extending the time the
drug remains in the blood stream to prolong the therapeutic effect and reducing
toxic side effects. The Company's liposome technology may be used as a method of
drug delivery in connection with drugs developed or being developed pursuant to
the Company's other technologies. The use of liposomes has the potential for
increasing the efficacy and safety of such drugs.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals intends to continue to develop products based on
its liposome platforms for oncological, hematological and infectious diseases.
The Company has identified certain generic and proprietary oncological compounds
that may benefit substantially from encapsulation in tumor-targeted liposomes
and has begun formulation studies for these compounds. As part of its strategy
to develop liposomal drugs, the Company has discussed, and will continue to
discuss, collaborative relationships with other companies to encapsulate such
companies' proprietary drugs in liposomes in order to increase the efficacy and
safety of the free drugs.
The Company is also testing liposomes for use in delivering SELEX
process-derived aptamers to specific targets. In vivo experiments involving a
VEGF antagonist aptamer developed by the Company have demonstrated that a
liposomal formulation of the aptamer bound with high affinity to VEGF and
inhibited the growth of endothelial cells and cancer cells. In these
experiments, the liposomal formulation substantially enhanced the inhibitory
activity of the aptamer.
14
<PAGE> 16
PROBESTAR NUCLEIC ACID DETECTION ASSAY
The Company is developing a technology, called Probestar, which is used for
detection of DNA and RNA of a specific sequence. Probestar is a proprietary
diagnostic technology which may be used as a substitute for PCR and other
systems in the detection of certain pathogens, the profiling of messenger RNA
and genotyping. Probestar is based on the ability of certain polymerases to both
copy and edit a nucleic acid template. The Company believes that Probestar has
the potential of decreasing the time and expense, while increasing the accuracy,
of nucleic acid detection when compared to current PCR-based systems.
ASSAY FOR HOMOCYSTEINE
Current research indicates that the level of homocysteine in a person's
blood may be more predictive than cholesterol of myocardial infarction and, at
certain levels, may indicate the likelihood of atherosclerosis. As a result,
screening for homocysteine has the possibility to replace and/or supplement
routine cholesterol screening. The Company has developed a homocysteine assay
which has the potential of being substantially less expensive than the typical
assays currently used to screen for homocysteine, while being more reliable than
alternative assays currently under development. The Company is considering
potential business structures for the marketing of its homocysteine assay.
NEXSTAR TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS
In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company established a new business unit,
NeXstar Technology Products ("NTP"), to market specialty chemicals and process
technologies to enhance the research and development of biomacromolecules
(including oligonucleotides). NTP is also developing the Company's PASS
technology for the production of oligonucleotides (aptamers) (See "-- Research
and Development -- PASS: Product Anchored Sequential Synthesis"). In addition to
producing oligonucleotides using the PASS technology, NTP expects to produce (i)
chemical building blocks for biomacromolecules, (ii) novel process reagents for
the assembly of biomacromolecules and (iii) synthetic linking technologies for
modulating the activity of biomacromolecules. The Company is currently marketing
an activator, called DCI, and monomers produced in its newly renovated Boulder,
Colorado facility, which encompasses approximately 9,800 square feet. See
"-- Manufacturing."
In January 1998, the Company acquired certain DNA synthesis patent rights
from PerSeptive Biosystems. The acquisition significantly expanded the patent
portfolio available to NTP for the production of oligonucleotides.
During 1997, NTP's revenues were $26,000, and as of December 31, 1997 NTP
had approximately $3.3 million of property, plant and equipment, at cost, as
recorded on the Company's balance sheet.
COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS
To apply and develop its technologies as widely as possible, NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals has entered into and expects to enter into strategic
collaborative research agreements, joint ventures and licensing arrangements
with pharmaceutical and other health care companies and research institutions.
In 1997, Schering A.G. ("Schering AG") agreed to increase its annual
funding to the Company to $2.4 million from $1.0 million in connection with a
collaborative research agreement first entered into in 1993. Under the terms of
their arrangement, the Company and Schering AG are using the Company's SELEX
process to discover and develop aptamers for use as in vivo imaging agents. If
successfully developed, the aptamers would be capable of binding to specific
targets in the body and could then be detected by a number of imaging
techniques, including gamma camera imaging.
Schering AG has specified that aptamers be developed for certain
cardiovascular and oncology targets. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has already
developed an aptamer capable of identifying arteries undergoing restenosis, a
condition that often develops after angioplasty to open arteries clogged by fat
and cholesterol deposits. As part of the work to create an aptamer that binds
with high specificity to arteries undergoing
15
<PAGE> 17
restenosis, the Company has developed a procedure for using the SELEX process to
discriminate between diseased and healthy tissue.
Schering AG is required to make milestone and royalty payments to the
Company upon commercialization and sale of any of the products developed in its
collaboration with the Company. If an aptamer identified during the research is
utilized by the Company outside of the field of in vivo imaging, the Company
will be required to pay a royalty to Schering AG.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has a significant ongoing collaborative
relationship with the University of Colorado at Boulder ("CU") relating to the
SELEX process technology. The relationship is formally with University Research
Corporation ("URC"), a for-profit, wholly owned subsidiary of the University of
Colorado Foundation, Inc. URC is designed to serve as the corporate vehicle for
commercial exploitation of inventions by the CU faculty. URC has assigned to
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals all of URC's present and future rights to (i) inventions
falling within the scope of the claims contained in issued patents and pending
patent applications for the SELEX process technology, (ii) improvements to such
technology made or discovered by researchers at CU, (iii) oligonucleotides or
other molecules that are derived through the application of such technology by
researchers at CU, (iv) results of certain sponsored research and (v) computer
software related to such technology. In connection with the rights assigned by
URC to the Company, URC is to receive certain royalties on the Company's net
sales of products derived from the SELEX process and on royalties received by
the Company from non-affiliates.
The Company's rights to market AmBisome are subject to an agreement between
the Company and Fujisawa USA, Inc. ("Fujisawa"). Under the terms of the
agreement, as amended, the Company has exclusive marketing rights to AmBisome in
all countries except the United States and Canada, subject to the Company's
obligation to pay royalties in connection with sales in most significant Asian
markets, including Japan. Additionally, the Company and Fujisawa co-promote
AmBisome in the United States and the Company manufactures AmBisome for sale in
the U.S. and Canada. The Company is reimbursed for the cost of the product sold
to Fujisawa and receives 20% of the gross profits from the sales of AmBisome in
the United States. In the event that the Company and Fujisawa are unable to
cooperate in connection with the promotion of AmBisome, the Company's potential
revenues from the sale of the product in the U.S. may be substantially reduced.
See "-- Products and Markets -- AmBisome."
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has also licensed the right to develop and market
AmBisome in Japan to Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo"). Under the
terms of the license, Sumitomo is required to make payments to the Company if
certain clinical and commercial milestones are met and to pay the Company
royalties on all Japanese sales of AmBisome. In March 1998, Sumitomo notified
the Company that all of the conditions necessary for the payment of a $3.0
million (less taxes to be withheld of $300,000) milestone have been fulfilled.
Under the terms of the license, Sumitomo is also required to make a milestone
payment to the Company if AmBisome is approved for sale in Japan.
MARKETING
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has established marketing subsidiaries in the
United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, France, Portugal, The Netherlands and
Australia and a marketing branch operation in Greece to promote and sell its
existing products. In addition, the Company has a domestic sales and marketing
organization to sell DaunoXome and to co-promote AmBisome in the U.S. NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals also has agreements with third-party distributors, including
distributors in certain of the countries in which the Company has marketing
operations, to promote, sell and distribute its products. In certain countries,
AmBisome and DaunoXome can be prescribed by individual physicians, who request
the products, even though a regulatory approval in that country has not yet been
obtained. In those cases, the Company's marketing professionals provide
information and assistance requested by physicians.
At March 15, 1998, the Company had 109 employees in sales and marketing of
which 82 were in Europe. Each of the Company's marketing subsidiaries is headed
by a general manager who oversees the Company's operations in the market(s)
served by the subsidiary. The subsidiaries assist in conducting Phase IV
clinical trials in the countries in which they are located and many of the major
subsidiaries have a physician employed
16
<PAGE> 18
by them to assist in conducting these clinical trials. The Company also has
established an administrative infrastructure in Europe, including accounting and
human resources support, to assist in its European marketing operations.
MANUFACTURING
The Company is manufacturing AmBisome in commercial quantities in its
initial facility in San Dimas, California (the "650 Facility") and in the
Company's newer facility in San Dimas, California (the "502 Facility"), which is
adjacent to the 650 Facility. The Medicines Control Agency of the United Kingdom
(the "MCA") has approved the manufacture of AmBisome for commercial distribution
at the 650 Facility and for commercial distribution through final lyophilization
at the 502 Facility. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") has
approved a new drug application listing both the 650 Facility and the 502
Facility for the manufacture of AmBisome for U.S. distribution. While the
Company currently uses internal capacity to perform lyophilization, it also uses
third parties to lyophilize some commercial batches. There can be no assurance
that problems with such lyophilization vendors will not occur and have an
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.
The Company currently has regulatory approval from the MCA and the FDA to
manufacture DaunoXome for commercial distribution at the 650 Facility. The
Company intends to seek MCA and FDA approval to manufacture DaunoXome at the 502
Facility. The MCA has determined that the 502 Facility is in general compliance
with the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice and has
indicated that it will support the licensing of DaunoXome in the facility. There
can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining the
regulatory approvals which it is seeking or may seek in connection with its
manufacturing facilities.
To import its products into the European Union (the "EU"), the Company must
obtain quality control release of its products in the EU. In September 1997, the
Company completed the acquisition of the toll manufacturing facility in Dublin,
Ireland in which a contract manufacturer had previously performed labeling and
quality control release for the Company's products in the EU. The total
acquisition price of the facility was one million Irish Punts (approximately
$1.5 million on September 30, 1997). Upon the completion of the acquisition, the
Company began performing its own quality control release at this facility for
distribution in the EU and elsewhere. Except for its lyophilization equipment,
the Company's manufacturing operations utilize no more than 50% of current
capacity.
During 1997, the Company completed the renovation of 9,800 square feet of
space which the Company is leasing near its principal executive offices in
Boulder, Colorado. The space is used to support the Company's commercial
projects and for ongoing research. In addition, the facility is being used to
produce specialty chemicals and other products for the Company's specialty
chemical process technologies unit, NeXstar Technology Products ("NTP"), and is
expected to be used for the large-scale production of any oligonucleotide
products developed by the Company. See " -- NeXstar Technology Products" and
"Properties." NeXstar Pharmaceuticals also leases 5,260 square feet of
industrial space in Boulder, Colorado. This space is used by NTP for the
manufacture of bulk drug candidate materials for eventual use in clinical trials
and product development programs in connection with oligonucleotide-based
compounds derived using the SELEX process. The Company intends to use this
facility for piloting a qualified pre-production process. In addition, this
facility can be utilized for the initial full scale production of clinical trial
material. Although construction of the facility, utilities and selected
environmental qualifications has been completed, there can be no assurance that
the production facility will ultimately obtain "current Good Manufacturing
Practices" status or that any drug substance proposed to be manufactured there
will be suitable for larger-scale production.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals concentrates on developing internal manufacturing
capabilities for its products at the same time as it develops those products.
While each liposomal formulation requires unique variations in process methods,
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals believes that it possesses the necessary technical
skills to design and implement scaled-up manufacturing capabilities for the
liposomal products it is currently developing. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to achieve such capabilities in
connection
17
<PAGE> 19
with new liposomal products or will be able to cost effectively manufacture any
compounds derived using the Company's non-liposomal technologies.
All of the component steps of the manufacturing process use equipment that
is commercially available and that can be obtained in larger sizes if required.
Currently, high quality amphotericin B, daunorubicin HCl and high quality
cholesterol, each of which is used in the Company's manufacture of liposome
products, are obtained only from single approved suppliers. Additional suppliers
of each of these components are presently under evaluation. In the event that
the materials become unavailable from their respective suppliers, the Company
believes that alternative supplies of such materials are or will become
available at reasonable prices. Other lipid materials and other raw materials
are available from a number of suppliers and NeXstar Pharmaceuticals believes
that supplies are adequate for the foreseeable future.
COMPETITION
Generally, competition in the pharmaceutical field is based on such factors
as product performance, safety, acceptance by doctors, patient compliance,
patent protection, ease of use, price, distribution, marketing and adaptability
to various modes of administration. The Company's products compete or may
compete with new chemical substances as well as improved delivery of current
drugs. The Company's products and potential products are in various stages of
development and no assurance can be given that any of these products or
potential products will be sufficiently more effective than existing treatment
alternatives to generate meaningful commercial demand.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals anticipates that it will face increased competition
in the future as new products enter the market and advanced technologies become
available. Many of the Company's existing or potential competitors have
substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals and may be better equipped to develop, manufacture and market
products. In addition, many of these companies have extensive experience in
research, preclinical testing and human clinical trials; obtaining FDA and other
regulatory approvals; and manufacturing and marketing their products. As a
result, these companies may develop and introduce products and processes more
rapidly than, and competitive with or superior to, those of NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals. There can be no assurance that existing products or new
products developed by the Company's competitors will not be more effective than
any that may be developed by NeXstar Pharmaceuticals. Competitive products may
render the Company's technology and products obsolete or noncompetitive.
In markets in which AmBisome has been approved as a primary therapy, it
competes against traditional amphotericin B, which is made by Bristol-Myers
Squibb Company, and expects to increasingly face competition from other
antifungal products, including those produced by major pharmaceutical companies.
In addition, there are a number of other companies that are focused on the
development of lipid-based products, some of which have lipid-based amphotericin
B products that have been approved in the United States and throughout Europe.
These products compete against AmBisome as both primary and secondary therapy
and have been offered at prices that are less than AmBisome's price. Other drugs
have been approved, or are awaiting approval, for the treatment of KS in the
U.S. and Europe, including one lipid-based anticancer drug, and these drugs
compete or are expected to compete with DaunoXome. If the Company is successful
in broadening the indications for DaunoXome, it will face competition from a
number of oncology drugs. Some of the drugs, which currently or may in the
future compete with DaunoXome, are owned by companies with substantially greater
resources than the Company's.
The Company believes that earlier entry into a market is an advantage for a
new drug, but it also believes that therapeutic index and cost-effectiveness are
important to a product's success. Ultimately, therefore, the Company believes
that its products and those of its competitors, whether or not lipid-based, will
compete on their merits in the markets where they are approved.
PATENTS, TRADE SECRETS AND LICENSES
Patents and other proprietary rights are important to the Company's
business. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals also relies upon trade secrets, know-how,
continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to
18
<PAGE> 20
develop and maintain its competitive position. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals actively
seeks patent protection both in the U.S. and internationally. As of March 1,
1998, NeXstar Pharmaceuticals had 93 issued U.S. patents and 119 pending U.S.
patent applications to protect its technology. Corresponding applications for
certain of the U.S. applications have been or will be filed in other countries.
The Company, as of March 1, 1998, had 498 issued foreign patents. The patents
and patent applications primarily relate to the Company's liposome products and
liposome technology and various aspects of its SELEX and Parallel SELEX
processes.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has licensed certain technology from and pays
royalties to the Regents of the University of California in connection with the
production and sale of AmBisome. The royalty rate varies depending on the amount
of revenues from the commercial sale of AmBisome, among other things. Currently,
the royalty rate averages less than 1% of net sales. In addition, NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals makes annual payments to The Liposome Company, Inc. ("TLC") in
connection with the settlement of litigation involving the Company and TLC. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Results of Operations." Pursuant to the settlement agreement
between the two parties, TLC agreed that it would not sue the Company in
connection with the worldwide production and sales of AmBisome. NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals has also licensed technology from and pays royalties to The City
of Hope National Medical Center in connection with the production and sale of
DaunoXome. The royalty rate varies depending on the amount of revenues from the
commercial sale of DaunoXome.
European and Japanese patents have a defined term following grant during
which opposition to the grant can be filed. Both NeXstar Pharmaceuticals and
certain of its competitors have filed such oppositions against each other with
respect to certain patents in Europe and Japan. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals has also
opposed the grant of European and Japanese patents of TLC and is involved in an
interference proceeding with a U.S. patent application owned by the University
of California relating to certain active drug loading techniques that the owners
of this patent or application could claim are used in the manufacture of
products such as DaunoXome.
Although patents are enforceable from the date of issuance and presumed to
be valid, future litigation or reexamination proceedings regarding the
enforcement or validity of the Company's existing patents or future patents, if
issued, could result in a ruling adverse to the Company that could invalidate
such patents or substantially reduce the scope of the protection afforded by
such patents. As to any issued patent or patent application, it is also possible
that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") could declare an
interference proceeding to determine, inter alia, priority of inventorship
between applications claiming the same invention. An adverse ruling in any such
interference proceeding could result in cancellation of claims in issued patents
or patent applications, limitations on the scope of issued patents or claims in
patent applications or in the awarding of the rights to third parties
participating in such interference. If the Company elects to, or is required to
participate in, interference proceedings declared by the USPTO, substantial cost
to the Company could result.
The Company also relies on trade secrets, proprietary know-how and
continuing technological innovation which it seeks to protect with
confidentiality agreements with its collaborators, employees and consultants.
There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that the
Company will have adequate remedies for any breach or that the Company's trade
secrets and proprietary know-how will not otherwise become known or be
independently discovered by competitors. Under certain of the Company's research
and development agreements, inventions discovered in certain cases become
jointly owned by the Company and the corporate partner or research institution
and in other cases become the exclusive property of the Company or the corporate
partner or research institution. Disputes may arise with respect to ownership of
any such inventions.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The production and marketing of the Company's products, developed through
the Company's technologies, and its ongoing research and development activities,
including its preclinical studies and clinical trials, are subject to regulation
by numerous federal, state and local governmental authorities in the United
States and by similar regulatory agencies in other countries where the Company
tests and markets, or intends to test and/or
19
<PAGE> 21
market, its current or potential products. There can be no assurance that the
Company will obtain further regulatory approvals to conduct clinical trials or
to market its products, or that the Company will obtain regulatory approvals to
conduct clinical trials or to market products developed in the future, if any,
on a timely basis. Prior to marketing any drug developed by the Company or
marketed under license, the Company must undergo an extensive regulatory
approval process by the FDA and comparable regulatory authorities in foreign
countries. The regulatory process, which includes preclinical testing and
clinical trials of each compound to establish its safety and efficacy, can take
many years and require the expenditure of substantial resources.
Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any of its
products under development, the Company must demonstrate through preclinical
studies and clinical trials that the product is safe and efficacious for use in
each target indication. The results from preclinical animal studies and early
clinical trials may not be predictive of results that will be obtained in large
scale testing, and there can be no assurance that the Company's clinical trials
will demonstrate the safety and efficacy of any products or will result in
marketable products. A number of companies in the biotechnology industry have
suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after
experiencing promising results in early animal and human testing. In addition,
the rate of completion of the Company's clinical trials is dependent upon, among
other factors, the rate of patient enrollment. Patient enrollment is a function
of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the
protocol, the Company's ability to manage the clinical trial, the proximity of
patients to clinical sites and the eligibility criteria for the study. Several
factors, such as delays in planned patient enrollment, may result in increased
costs and delays or termination of clinical trials prior to completion, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Preclinical studies must
also be conducted in conformity with the FDA's good laboratory practice
regulations. Clinical trials generally must meet requirements for institutional
review board oversight and informed consent, as well as regulatory agency prior
review, oversight and good clinical practice requirements.
The procedure for obtaining regulatory approval for a new human
pharmaceutical product involves many steps. Initially, NeXstar Pharmaceuticals
conducts animal studies to secure data relevant to potential safety and
efficacy. Based on the data from these animal studies, NeXstar Pharmaceuticals
files applications to conduct clinical trials of the products in humans. Such
applications, known as Investigational New Drug applications in the United
States, must be made in each country in which NeXstar Pharmaceuticals proposes
to conduct clinical trials. Once such applications have been approved, NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals can commence clinical trials.
Clinical trials are generally conducted in three phases. Phase I trials are
designed to test basic human safety. Phase II trials test dosage and involve a
detailed evaluation of human efficacy and safety. Phase III trials involve
large-scale evaluation of general efficacy and safety and a comparison with
existing alternative therapies for the treatment of a specific indication. To
the extent possible, NeXstar Pharmaceuticals designs such clinical trials to
meet the standards of both foreign and U.S. regulatory authorities, but there
can be no assurance that the authorities in any country will be satisfied with
the conduct of any particular clinical trial. Data obtained from preclinical and
clinical activities are susceptible to varying interpretations which could
delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. In addition, delays or rejections
may be encountered based upon changes in the policies of regulatory authorities
for drug approval during the period of product development and regulatory review
of each submitted new drug application or product license application. The
Company may be required to demonstrate that the proposed product represents an
improved form of treatment over existing therapies. There can be no assurance
that, even after such time and expenditures, regulatory approvals will be
obtained for any drugs developed or discovered by the Company or its
collaborative partners utilizing the Company's technologies.
If the results of its clinical trials indicate it is appropriate, NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals may file for regulatory approvals of the product. Such filings
are known as New Drug Applications in the United States and as Product License
Applications in Europe. Prior to making any filing, the Company determines
whether it has sufficient data for such filing and whether the Company is likely
to generate sufficient revenues in order to justify the time and expense of such
filing.
20
<PAGE> 22
When a regulatory authority approves the sale of a drug, regulations also
govern the manufacturing process and marketing activities, including the types
of information that the Company may provide to health care providers, and may
require post-marketing testing and surveillance programs to monitor the effects
of the Company's products. Moreover, if regulatory approval of a drug is
granted, such approval is likely to entail limitations on the indicated uses for
which it may be marketed. Further, even if such regulatory approval is obtained,
a marketed drug and its manufacturer are subject to continual review, and
discovery of previously unknown problems with a product or manufacturer may
result in restrictions on such product or manufacturer, including withdrawal of
the product from the market. During the first quarter of 1997, the Company
received and responded to an FDA warning concerning certain promotional
materials supplied by the Company in connection with the sale of DaunoXome in
the U.S. While the Company does not believe that the actions which it has taken
in connection with the warning letter will adversely affect the operations of
the Company, no assurance can be given.
Regulatory approval of prices is generally required in most foreign
countries. In particular, certain countries will condition their approval of a
product on the agreement of the seller not to sell that product for more than a
certain price in that country and in the past have required price reductions
after or in connection with product approval. There can be no assurance that
regulatory authorities in the future will not establish lower prices or that any
regulatory action reducing the price of AmBisome or DaunoXome in any one country
will not have the practical effect of requiring the Company correspondingly to
reduce its prices in other countries. There can be no assurance that the
resulting prices would be sufficient to generate an acceptable return on the
Company's investment in its products.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals is aggressively pursuing worldwide
commercialization of its products. In some countries, regulatory procedures
allow for product sales under certain circumstances before final regulatory
approvals are obtained. The Company has submitted and will continue to submit
requests for approval of AmBisome and DaunoXome with regulatory authorities
worldwide. Regulatory procedures and review times vary from country to country.
There can be no assurance that any of the Company's pending applications for
approvals will be granted or that regulatory actions will be taken in a timely
fashion.
The Company has received an approved shelf life for DaunoXome of 52 weeks
in the United States and 40 weeks in Canada and most European countries. While
the Company is attempting to obtain longer shelf lives than those currently
approved in Canada and Europe, there can be no assurance that the extension of
any approved shelf lives will be approved by any regulatory authority. The
Company in the past has replaced, and in the future expects, under certain
circumstances, to replace, vials of DaunoXome with expired shelf lives and the
likelihood that customers would seek to return material amounts of DaunoXome to
the Company because of the expiration of its shelf life may be increased if
shelf lives longer than those currently approved are not obtained.
In addition, the Company's manufacturing facilities are subject to
inspection and regulation by U.S., foreign and state regulatory agencies. The
Company's facilities in San Dimas, California have been inspected by the FDA,
the MCA and the State of California. These agencies may reinspect at any time,
and other countries' regulatory authorities may inspect the Company's facilities
as well. Furthermore, although the Company's current pharmaceutical products do
not require export licenses, there can be no assurance that export licenses will
not be required in the future. See "-- Manufacturing."
Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can, among other
things, result in fines, suspension of regulatory approvals, product recalls,
seizure of products, imposition of operating restrictions and criminal
prosecutions. Further, FDA policy or similar policies of regulatory agencies in
other countries may change and additional government regulations may be
established that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of potential
products.
The Company's research and development involves the controlled use of
hazardous materials, chemicals, viruses and various radioactive compounds.
Although the Company believes that its safety procedures for handling and
disposing of such materials comply with the standards prescribed by state and
federal regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these
materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of such an accident, the
Company could be held liable for any damages that result
21
<PAGE> 23
and any such liability could exceed the resources of the Company or otherwise
adversely affect the Company. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals is subject to numerous
environmental and safety laws and regulations, including those governing the use
of hazardous materials. In June 1995, the Company was contacted by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") informing the Company that it is a
potentially responsible party relating to the disposal of the Company's waste
products by a third party at a hazardous waste disposal facility. The Company
has complied with all requests by the EPA relating to this matter and believes
that its liability with respect to this matter will be minimal; however, there
can be no assurance that this matter or any violation of, or the cost of
compliance with, environmental and safety laws and regulations will not
adversely impact the Company's operations.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 15, 1998, NeXstar Pharmaceuticals and its subsidiaries employed
558 persons on a full-time basis, of whom 333 were engaged in research,
development, clinical research, regulatory affairs, quality control and
manufacturing and 225 were engaged in marketing, finance and administration.
There can be no assurance that NeXstar Pharmaceuticals will be able to continue
to attract and retain qualified personnel in sufficient numbers to meet its
needs. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals believes that it maintains good relations with
its employees.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
executive officers and directors of the Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Lawrence M. Gold, Ph.D. ............... 56 Chairman of the Board and Chief
Scientific Officer
Patrick J. Mahaffy..................... 35 President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
Michael E. Hart........................ 45 Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Raymond A. Bendele, D.V.M., Ph.D. ..... 52 Vice President, Life Sciences
Edward N. Brody, M.D., Ph.D. .......... 59 Vice President, Drug Discovery
Anthony D. Caracciolo.................. 43 Vice President, Manufacturing
Bruce E. Eaton, Ph.D. ................. 44 Vice President, Chemistry
Crispin G.S. Eley, D. Phil. ........... 40 Vice President, Pharmaceutical
Operations
David W. Flamberg...................... 53 Vice President, Compliance
George B. Herron....................... 50 Vice President, Sales and Marketing
Barbara B. Kazmier..................... 41 Vice President, Human Resources
Nicole Onetto, M.D. ................... 45 Vice President, Medical Affairs
Paul G. Schmidt, Ph.D. ................ 53 Vice President, Drug Delivery Research
Larry W. Smith......................... 44 Vice President and General Counsel
John D. Baldeschwieler, Ph.D. ......... 64 Director
Judith A. Hemberger, Ph.D. ............ 50 Director
David I. Hirsh, Ph.D. ................. 58 Director
Roger G. Kennedy....................... 71 Director
Rodman W. Moorhead, III................ 54 Director
</TABLE>
Dr. Gold, a founder of the Company, has been a director of the Company
since its inception in 1991 and has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors
since February 1993. He was Executive Vice President of Research and Development
of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals from March 1991 to February 1995. In February 1995,
Dr. Gold was named Chief Scientific Officer of the Company. Dr. Gold was
Chairman of the Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology at
the University of Colorado at Boulder ("CU") from 1988 to 1992. In addition to
his full-time duties at the Company, Dr. Gold has been a professor at CU since
1970 and has received the CU Distinguished Lectureship Award. From January 1981
to June
22
<PAGE> 24
1988, Dr. Gold served as Founder and Co-Director of Research for Synergen, Inc.,
a biopharmaceutical company located in Boulder, Colorado. Dr. Gold is a
recipient of the National Institutes of Health Merit Award and Career
Development Award. Dr. Gold received an A.B. in Biochemistry from Yale
University and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the University of Connecticut. Dr.
Gold is a member of the National Academy of Sciences.
Mr. Mahaffy has been President and Chief Executive Officer of NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals since June 1992 and has served as a director since the Company's
inception in 1991. Prior to joining NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Mr. Mahaffy was
employed beginning in 1986 by E.M. Warburg, Pincus & Co., LLC ("Warburg"), a
specialized financial services firm, where he last served as a Vice President.
Mr. Mahaffy received a B.A. in International Affairs from Lewis and Clark
College and an M.A. in International Affairs from Columbia University.
Mr. Hart served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Vestar, Inc. ("Vestar") from November 1990 to February 1995. In February 1995,
Mr. Hart was named Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals. He was employed by Avantek, Inc. as Treasurer and Director of
Finance from June 1982 through November 1990. From May 1980 to June 1982, he was
employed by Magnuson Computer Systems as Assistant Treasurer. Prior to 1980, Mr.
Hart was employed by Memorex Corporation where he held various financial
positions. Mr. Hart received a B.A. in Business Economics and a B.A. in
Geography from the University of California at Santa Barbara. He received an
M.B.A. from California State University, Fresno.
Dr. Bendele has been Vice President, Life Sciences of NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals since December 1996 after serving as the Senior Director, Life
Sciences of the Company from September 1995 to December 1996. From February 1993
until August 1995, Dr. Bendele was the Company's Director of Pharmacology and
Toxicology. From 1979 to 1993, he worked at Eli Lilly and Company where he
served in numerous capacities, including Director of Pharmaceutical Projects
Management and Director of Pathology. Dr. Bendele received a B.S. in Veterinary
Science, a D.V.M. and a Ph.D. in Veterinary Pathology from Texas A&M University.
Dr. Brody became the Company's Vice President, Drug Discovery in February
1998 and has been an advisor to the Company since 1991. From 1988 until January
1998, Dr. Brody worked for the Centre de Genetique Moleculaire in
Gif-sur-Yvette, France, including serving as Research Director from 1996 until
January 1998. He currently is, and has been since 1996, an adjunct professor at
the University of Colorado. Dr. Brody holds an M.D. and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry
from the University of Chicago.
Mr. Caracciolo became the Company's Vice President, Manufacturing in March
1997. From September 1991 to February 1997, Mr. Caracciolo was the Vice
President, Operations of Bausch & Lomb Pharmaceuticals Inc., after having been
the Vice President and General Manager of Sterling Pharmaceuticals Inc. from
1989 to 1991. Mr. Caracciolo has over 19 years of pharmaceutical experience and
has held various positions in manufacturing and operational management. Mr.
Caracciolo has a B.S. in Pharmaceutical Science from St. John's University.
Dr. Eaton has been Vice President, Chemistry of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals
since January 1995. During 1994, he was the Company's Director of Medicinal
Chemistry. From 1989 to 1994, he was an Assistant Professor and in 1995 an
Associate Professor of Chemistry at Washington State University. From 1986 to
1989, Dr. Eaton was a Research Chemist at Amoco Corporation studying the
computer aided design and synthesis of macromolecules. From 1981 to 1986, he was
a consultant and Research Associate in bioconjugate chemistry with HANA
Biologics. Dr. Eaton has a B.S. degree in Biology, a B.S. in Chemistry and an
M.S. in Organic Chemistry from the University of Oregon, Eugene. He received a
Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from the University of California, Berkeley.
Dr. Eley served as the Vice President of Product Development of Vestar from
March 1993 until February 1995 when he was appointed the Vice President,
Pharmaceutical Operations of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals. From August 1985 until
March 1993, Dr. Eley held the following positions with Vestar: Senior Research
Scientist (August 1985 until March 1988); Director, Chemistry Research (March
1988 until March 1989); Director, Chemistry (March 1989 until January 1992); and
Senior Director, Product Development (January
23
<PAGE> 25
1992 until March 1993). Dr. Eley has a B.A. in Chemistry and a D.Phil. in
Chemistry from Oxford University.
Mr. Flamberg served as Vice President of Compliance of Vestar from January
1994 until February 1995 when he was appointed Vice President, Compliance of
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals. Mr. Flamberg served as Director, QA/QC of Vestar from
1986 to 1990 and as Vestar's Senior Director of Compliance from 1990 to 1994.
Prior to joining Vestar in 1986, Mr. Flamberg spent 20 years serving in a
variety of posts in pharmaceutical quality operations and product development
for Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. in Bedford, Ohio. Mr. Flamberg holds a B.S. in
Chemistry-Biology from Bucknell University and an M.B.A. from Baldwin-Wallace
College.
Mr. Herron has been Vice President, Sales and Marketing of the Company
since July 1995 after having served as Senior Director, Marketing of the Company
from February 1995 until June 1995. From April 1990 until March 1993, he was the
General Manager of Vestar's United Kingdom office and from April 1993 until
February 1995, he was Senior Director, Marketing of Vestar. Prior to joining
Vestar, Mr. Herron held several senior marketing positions for various
pharmaceutical companies, including Kirby-Warrick Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (August
1986 until November 1989), Schering Corporation (September 1984 until August
1986), Novo Laboratories (November 1982 until July 1984) and Smith Kline &
French Laboratories (January 1975 until November 1982). Mr. Herron received a
B.S. from Queen's University in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Ms. Kazmier has been Vice President, Human Resources of the Company since
December 1995 after having served as Director, Human Resources of the Company
from August 1994 until December 1995. From October 1987 until August 1994, Ms.
Kazmier served in various human resources management positions at Syntex
Chemicals, Inc. Ms. Kazmier has a B.A. from Metropolitan State College and an
M.S. in Management and Organization from the University of Colorado.
Dr. Onetto has been the Vice President, Medical Affairs of the Company
since May 1997 after serving as the Senior Director, Medical Affairs for the
Oncology Division -- Europe of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Onetto joined
Bristol-Myers Squibb in 1991 after having worked in clinical research positions
for Immunex Corporation from 1990 to 1991 and Hoechst Canada, Inc. from 1989 to
1990. She holds a B.A. from the Academy of Paris, an M.D. from the University of
Paris V with a specialization in pediatrics and hematology and an M.Sc.
Pharmacology from the University of Montreal. She is a member of the American
Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Association of Cancer Research and
the European Society of Medical Oncology.
Dr. Schmidt served as Executive Vice President, Research Operations of
Vestar from March 1993 to February 1995. In February 1995, Dr. Schmidt was named
Vice President, Drug Delivery Research of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals. From December
1988 to July 1991, Dr. Schmidt was Vestar's Vice President, Research and
Development and from July 1991 until March 1993, he was Vestar's Executive Vice
President, Research and Development. Prior to joining Vestar in 1983, he served
as Associate Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Oklahoma Medical
Research Foundation where he received a Research Career Development Award from
the National Institutes of Health, and as Assistant Professor of Chemistry and
Biochemistry at the University of Illinois, Urbana. Dr. Schmidt received a B.S.
in chemistry from Pomona College and a Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry from Stanford
University. He is a member of the American Chemical Society and the American
Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. From 1984 until 1992, Dr. Schmidt
was a Visiting Associate at the California Institute of Technology.
Mr. Smith became the Company's Vice President and General Counsel in
February 1998 after serving as an attorney for the Company since January 1995.
From 1984 to 1990 and during 1994, Mr. Smith was an associate at O'Melveny &
Myers, a Los Angeles-based law firm. During 1993, he served as a legal and
financial consultant for Pacific Holding Company and from 1990 to 1991 he was
the Vice President and General Counsel of Cummings Point Industries, Inc., a
manufacturing company. Mr. Smith has a Bachelor of Journalism degree and an
M.B.A. from the University of Texas and a J.D. from Columbia University.
Dr. Baldeschwieler is a founder of Vestar and served as Chairman of the
Vestar Board of Directors from Vestar's inception in April 1981 to January 1993
and as a director through February 1995. He has served as a
24
<PAGE> 26
director of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals since February 1995. He is currently a
Professor of Chemistry at the California Institute of Technology and was
Chairman of the Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering from 1973 to
1978. Dr. Baldeschwieler was Deputy Director of the Office of Science and
Technology, Executive Office of the President from 1971 to 1973, and previously
served on the faculties of Stanford and Harvard Universities. He received a
Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr.
Baldeschwieler is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American
Philosophical Society.
Dr. Hemberger has been a consultant for, and a director of, the Company
since 1997. She served as the Senior Vice President, Global Drug Regulatory
Affairs, for Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. from 1995 until 1997 after serving as
Vice President, Global Medical Affairs and Commercial Development; Vice
President, Global Regulatory and Medical Affairs; Vice President, Global
Regulatory Affairs and Scientific Communications; and Vice President, Regulatory
Affairs and Scientific Communications for Marion Merrell Dow Inc. from 1989 to
1995. From 1979 to 1989, Dr. Hemberger served in various capacities at Marion
Laboratories, Inc., including as Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and
Scientific Communications. She received a B.S. from Mount St. Scholastic
College, an M.B.A. from Rockhurst College and a Ph.D. from the University of
Missouri.
Dr. Hirsh has been a director of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals since February
1993. He currently is the Robert Wood Johnson, Jr. Professor and Chairman of the
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics at Columbia University's
College of Physicians and Surgeons. Dr. Hirsh has been a professor at Columbia
University since July 1990. Dr. Hirsh received a B.A. in Biology from Reed
College and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from Rockefeller University.
Mr. Kennedy has been a director of the Company since 1997. He served as the
Director of the U.S. National Park Service from 1993 to March 1997 after having
served as the Director of the National Museum of American History of the
Smithsonian Institution from 1979 to 1993. Prior to his association with the
Smithsonian Institution, Mr. Kennedy was Vice President, Finance and Senior
Financial Officer of The Ford Foundation. He has been a member of the Finance
Committee of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, chairman
of several finance committees for major foundations and a financial advisor to
many universities, including Harvard, Princeton, Stanford and Yale. In addition,
Mr. Kennedy served on the Vestar Board of Directors from 1989 to 1993.
Mr. Moorhead has served as a director of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals since June
1992 and was a director of Vestar from 1984 to February 1995. He has been
employed since 1973 by Warburg, where he currently serves as a Senior Managing
Director. He is a director of: Coventry Corporation, a multi-market health
maintenance organization; Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., a gene therapy company;
Xomed Surgical Products, a surgical devices and ophthalmology products company;
and a number of privately held companies. He also is a trustee of ElderTrust, a
healthcare real estate investment trust. Mr. Moorhead received an A.B. and an
M.B.A. from Harvard University. He is a trustee of The Taft School and a member
of the Overseers' Committee on University Resources, Harvard College.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company's corporate headquarters, including its principal executive
offices, are located in Boulder, Colorado. The Company leases three significant
facilities and subleases one other facility in Boulder which consist of: a
sublease of approximately 32,000 square feet of office space (the "Subleased
Office Space"), which space is being used as administrative offices; a lease of
approximately 60,000 square feet of space (the "Research Facilities"), which
space is being used as administrative offices and as research laboratories; a
lease of approximately 9,800 square feet of space (the "Development Lab"), which
space the Company is using as a development lab and scale-up facility in
connection with drug candidates discovered using the Company's SELEX process and
as a facility in which to produce specialty chemicals and other products; and a
lease of 5,260 square feet of industrial space (the "Manufacturing Facility"),
which space is being prepared for piloting a qualified pre-production process
which is used for the manufacture of bulk drug substance pharmaceuticals in
connection with oligonucleotide-based compounds derived using the SELEX process.
The
25
<PAGE> 27
sublease for the Subleased Office Space expires in July 2003. The lease for the
Research Facilities expires in October 2001, but can be renewed at the option of
the Company for two successive five-year periods. The lease for the Development
Lab expires in November 2001, but can be renewed by the Company for an
additional three years. The lease for the Manufacturing Facility expires in
January 2002, but may be renewed at the option of the Company for two successive
seven-year periods. The Development Lab and Manufacturing Facility will be used
primarily by NeXstar Technology Products, the Company's specialty chemicals and
process technologies business unit.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals also occupies a facility in San Dimas, California
(the "650 Facility") under a noncancelable operating lease which expires in May
2003 and has two five-year renewal options. The 650 Facility provides 51,500
square feet of space and houses research and development activities,
manufacturing and certain administrative functions. The 650 Facility has been
inspected by the State of California for compliance with "current Good
Manufacturing Practices" and is licensed by the State of California for
pharmaceutical manufacturing. The license is renewable annually. The 650
Facility has been registered for the commercial production of AmBisome and
DaunoXome by the MCA and the FDA.
In April 1992, the Company entered into a long-term lease agreement for a
manufacturing facility adjacent to the 650 Facility in San Dimas, California
(the "502 Facility"). The 502 Facility, the lease to which expires in November
2003 and has two five-year renewal options, provides in excess of 70,000 square
feet of space including approximately 45,000 square feet of manufacturing space,
and is the Company's primary injectable pharmaceutical production plant. The MCA
has approved the manufacture of AmBisome through final lyophilization at the 502
Facility and the MCA has indicated that it will support the licensing of the
manufacture of DaunoXome at the 502 Facility. The FDA has approved the 502
Facility for the manufacture of AmBisome for U.S. distribution and the Company
intends to seek FDA approval of a new drug application listing for the
manufacture of DaunoXome at the 502 facility.
In addition, the Company in September 1997 acquired a facility located in
Dublin, Ireland, in which the quality control testing, final labeling and
packaging are currently being conducted for AmBisome and DaunoXome for the EU
and elsewhere. The Company paid 1 million Irish Punts (approximately $1.5
million on September 30, 1997) for the 14,779 square foot facility.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Both the Company and certain of its competitors have filed oppositions
against each other as to patents granted by the European Patent Office and
patents granted by the Japanese Patent Office. The Liposome Company, Inc.
("TLC") and the University of California each have patents or patent
applications relating to active drug loading techniques that the owners could
claim are used in the manufacture of products such as DaunoXome. The Company has
opposed the grant of a European and a Japanese patent owned by TLC and is
involved in an interference proceeding with a U.S. patent application owned by
the University of California relating to such loading technology.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote by the Company's security holders
during the fourth quarter of the Company's fiscal year ending December 31, 1997.
26
<PAGE> 28
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market (Symbol:
NXTR). The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and
low closing sales prices per share of the Company's common stock as reported on
the Nasdaq National Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
----- -----
<S> <C> <C>
1996:
First Quarter......................................... $26 3/4 $15 1/2
Second Quarter........................................ 25 1/2 16 3/4
Third Quarter......................................... 22 3/4 16 3/8
Fourth Quarter........................................ 21 13 1/16
1997:
First Quarter......................................... $17 3/4 $10
Second Quarter........................................ 15 1/4 9 3/8
Third Quarter......................................... 18 1/2 12 1/2
Fourth Quarter........................................ 18 1/2 10 5/16
</TABLE>
According to the records of the Company's transfer agent, the Company had
approximately 517 stockholders of record as of March 17, 1998. Because many of
such shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of
stockholders, the Company is unable to estimate the total number of beneficial
owners represented by these record holders.
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock
since its inception. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends
on its common stock in the next several years. Certain of the Company's bank and
building improvement and equipment lease facilities require the Company to
maintain financial ratios and levels of cash and/or stockholders' equity which
may have the effect of limiting the Company's ability to pay dividends.
SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
All of the Company's sales of unregistered securities during 1997 have
previously been reported in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
27
<PAGE> 29
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data are derived from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, which have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors. The selected consolidated
financial data give retroactive effect to the merger of NeXagen, Inc. and
Vestar, Inc. on February 21, 1995, which has been accounted for as a
pooling-of-interests. The selected consolidated financial data also include the
acquisition of Supragen, Inc., a research-oriented biotechnology company, on
September 8, 1995, which has been accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Certain reclassifications, including adjustments to conform
accounting practices, have been made to prior year amounts to agree with the
current year presentation. The data should be read in conjunction with
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and related
notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
DATA:
Revenues:
Product revenues....................... $ 89,152 $ 80,153 $ 57,770 $ 43,967 $ 30,518
License fees........................... 10 7,000 -- -- --
Royalties.............................. 671 -- -- -- --
Collaborative agreements and
contracts........................... 2,388 1,548 2,920 4,054 2,098
Interest income........................ 2,446 1,821 1,736 2,409 2,424
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Total revenues........................... 94,667 90,522 62,426 50,430 35,040
Expenses:
Cost of goods sold..................... 19,787 18,320 13,246 8,091 5,024
Research and development............... 53,015 47,760 37,356 31,595 24,574
Selling, general and administrative.... 45,033 42,933 35,300 22,108 16,279
Litigation settlement and related
expenses............................ 16,031 2,006 -- -- --
Purchased research and development..... -- -- 11,824 -- --
Retirement agreement expense........... -- -- -- 4,097 --
Interest expense....................... 4,389 1,558 1,148 587 308
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Total expenses........................... 138,255 112,577 98,874 66,478 46,185
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Loss before provision for income taxes... (43,588) (22,055) (36,448) (16,048) (11,145)
Provision for income taxes............... 322 926 183 159 167
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Net loss................................. $ (43,910) $ (22,981) $ (36,631) $(16,207) $(11,312)
========= ========= ========= ======== ========
Net loss per share....................... $ (1.65) $ (0.88) $ (1.57) $ (0.71) $ (0.53)
========= ========= ========= ======== ========
Shares used in computing net loss
per share.............................. 26,692 26,029 23,374 22,825 21,336
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable
securities............................. $ 64,289 $ 41,965 $ 26,734 $ 40,284 $ 54,495
Working capital.......................... 89,943 48,199 35,029 44,099 62,094
Total assets............................. 170,543 144,500 112,449 126,927 103,912
Accrued litigation settlement expenses
due after one year..................... 8,767 -- -- -- --
Long-term obligations.................... 8,327 15,206 9,848 10,500 2,107
Convertible subordinated debentures...... 80,000 -- -- -- --
Accumulated deficit...................... (169,886) (125,976) (102,995) (66,364) (50,157)
Total stockholders' equity............... 46,002 87,622 81,164 97,374 91,135
</TABLE>
28
<PAGE> 30
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (See "Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" on page 2). These forward-looking
statements represent the expectations of the Company's management as of the
filing date of this Form 10-K. The Company's actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements due to risks
and uncertainties, including those described under "Risk Factors" in Part II of
this Report and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The Company's stockholders and
potential investors should consider carefully these risks and uncertainties in
evaluating NeXstar Pharmaceuticals' financial condition and results of
operations.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals is an integrated biopharmaceutical company engaged
in the discovery, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary
pharmaceutical products to treat life-threatening and other serious oncological,
hematological and infectious diseases.
The Company markets AmBisome, a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B,
for the treatment of life-threatening fungal infections, and DaunoXome, a
liposomal formulation of the anticancer agent daunorubicin, which is used as a
first line therapy for the treatment of HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma ("KS").
The Company currently relies on sales of AmBisome in Europe for a substantial
majority of its product revenues and expects sales of AmBisome in Europe to
account for a majority of its revenues in 1998. On August 11, 1997, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration approved AmBisome for use in the United States as a
primary therapy for patients with a low white blood cell count (febrile
neutropenia) who have a presumed fungal infection, also known as fever of
unknown origin or FUO, or with visceral leishmaniasis and as a secondary
treatment for fungal infections that do not respond to amphotericin B treatment.
AmBisome has been approved for sale by the regulatory authorities in 32
countries for the treatment of life-threatening fungal infections, including 15
countries in which it has been approved as a primary therapy for some form of
fungal infection. DaunoXome has been approved for sale as a primary therapy for
KS in 21 countries, including the United States, Canada and all significant
Western European markets. The Company is also conducting clinical trials with a
third product, the antibiotic MiKasome, a liposomal formulation of amikacin (a
potent aminoglycoside antibiotic). During the fourth quarter of 1997, the
Company began a Phase II clinical study of MiKasome to assess its use in
patients with complicated urinary tract infections and is currently initiating a
Phase II clinical trial of MiKasome in adult patients with stable cystic
fibrosis. The Company plans to conduct additional Phase II clinical trials with
MiKasome in 1998.
Several of the Company's SELEX process-derived compounds (including aptamer
antagonists to vascular endothelial growth factor ("VEGF") and aptamers which
inhibit the activity of certain selectins) are in preclinical or early
preclinical development. The Company plans to file an Investigational New Drug
("IND") application in the U.S. during 1998 for its aptamer antagonist to VEGF
for the treatment of the most severe form of age-related macular degeneration.
The timing of the IND application for the VEGF antagonist and additional Phase
II clinical trials for MiKasome may be affected by many factors including, among
others, unanticipated delays; unexpected preclinical or clinical trial results,
as applicable; and difficulties in enrolling patients. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to meet the time schedule which it has established
for any of its products.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals was formed in 1991 as NeXagen, Inc. On February 21,
1995, NeXagen, Inc. merged (the "Merger") with Vestar, Inc. ("Vestar"), a
company formed in 1981. In connection with the Merger, NeXagen, Inc. changed its
name to NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The Merger was accounted for as a
pooling-of-interests. Except where otherwise indicated, this Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations gives
effect to the Merger and the pooling-of-interests accounting treatment, and thus
includes the results of Vestar for all periods discussed.
29
<PAGE> 31
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS, CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS
In connection with a majority of its European sales, the Company prices its
products in the currencies of the countries into which they are sold (the
"Payment Currencies"), and revenues in the past have been and in the future
could be adversely affected by currency fluctuations. A significant majority of
the Company's manufacturing costs are in U.S. Dollars. Therefore, any decline in
the value of the Payment Currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar is likely to
negatively impact gross margins for the Company's products since the Company's
manufacturing costs would stay approximately the same while its revenue in terms
of U.S. Dollars would decline. Sales in Germany, the U.K., Italy and Spain
together accounted for 55% of the Company's product sales for the year ended
December 31, 1997. The Company prices its products in each of these four
countries in the local currency. Between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 1997,
the exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar increased 17%, 4%, 16% and 17%,
respectively, against the German Mark, the British Pound, the Italian Lira and
the Spanish Peseta. Absent an increase in the price of the Company's products
throughout Europe or a general decline in the value of the U.S. Dollar versus
most leading European currencies, the continued strength of the U.S. Dollar may
significantly impact the Company's revenues as denominated in U.S. Dollars.
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals hedges certain of its foreign currency exposures
with respect to its outstanding trade accounts receivable and accounts payable
through the use of forward contracts. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals does not currently
enter into speculative foreign currency transactions and does not write
speculative options. In the future, the Company may begin currency hedging in
connection with anticipated revenues and expenses and may use options in
addition to forward contracts. Such hedging will be done solely for the purpose
of protecting the Company from foreign currency fluctuations. The Company
recognizes a gain or loss for each forward contract equal to the difference
between the contract rate and the market rate on each balance sheet date which
is recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense. At present, no
deferred accounting is used in connection with the Company's hedging activities.
Notwithstanding its hedging activities (which have not always included fully
hedging against potential gains or losses), the Company has in the past
recognized foreign exchange gains and losses. There can be no assurance that
significant gains or losses will not be incurred in the future.
Although a substantial majority of the Company's product sales have been,
and during 1998 are expected to be, in Europe and the United States, the Company
sells its products throughout the world, including in East Asia where many
countries' economies and capital markets have been severely and negatively
affected in the past several months. The values of many East Asian countries'
currencies have declined substantially compared with the U.S. Dollar. To date,
the Company has not been materially affected by economic events in East Asia
since (i) its sales in East Asia are primarily in U.S. Dollars, (ii)
historically sales to these countries have represented only a small fraction of
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals' revenues (product sales to East Asian countries in 1997
represented less than 1% of the Company's total revenues) and (iii) the Company
has no offices or direct operations in this area. The Company, however,
considers East Asia to be an area of potential growth and during the first
quarter of 1998 it entered into agreements with third-party distributors for the
sale of AmBisome in China, including Hong Kong, and Taiwan, in addition to the
arrangements which it already has in place for the sale of AmBisome in Japan,
South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Therefore, any long-term decline
in the economies or currencies of East Asian countries could have an impact on
the future revenues of the Company. To the extent that the Company sells its
products in local currencies in this part of the world, it expects to employ
currency hedging strategies similar to those which it uses for European
currencies.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
PRODUCT REVENUES. Product revenues increased 11% to $89.2 million, 39% to
$80.2 million and 31% to $57.8 million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively,
primarily due to increased unit sales of AmBisome in European markets. Gains
from increased unit sales of AmBisome during 1997 were offset by a reduction in
the average selling price (as calculated in U.S. Dollars) compared to
corresponding periods in 1996 and 1995,
30
<PAGE> 32
approximately 42% of which reduction was due to the appreciation in the value of
the U.S. Dollar compared to the European currencies received in payment for the
product. A significant majority of the Company's 1997 product sales were in
European currencies. Absent an increase in the price of the Company's products
throughout Europe or a general decline in the value of the U.S. Dollar versus
most leading European currencies, the continued strength of the U.S. Dollar may
significantly impact the Company's revenues as denominated in U.S. Dollars. As a
result of the U.S. approval of AmBisome in the third quarter of 1997, the
Company anticipates that a greater percentage of its sales during 1998 will
occur outside of Europe. Sales of DaunoXome, which was initially approved in the
U.S. during the second quarter of 1996, totaled $5.2 million and $3.9 million
during 1997 and 1996, respectively.
LICENSE FEES. During 1996, the Company recorded as revenue an initial $7.0
million licensing fee (less withholding taxes of $700,000) in connection with a
licensing agreement with Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo")
pursuant to which Sumitomo is developing and intends to market AmBisome in
Japan.
ROYALTIES. During 1997, the Company received royalties of $671,000 in
connection with the sale of AmBisome in the U.S. following its third-quarter
approval by the FDA. This amount will increase if the amount of sales of
AmBisome in the U.S. increases.
COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS. Collaborative agreement and
contract revenues were $2.4 million, $1.5 million and $2.9 million for 1997,
1996 and 1995, respectively. The increase for 1997 was due to an agreement by
Schering A.G., in February 1997, to increase its annual funding to the Company
to $2.4 million from $1.0 million in connection with a collaborative research
agreement first entered into in 1993. The decline in 1996 related to the
expiration or termination of collaborations between the Company and certain
corporate partners. Collaborative agreement and contract revenue fluctuations
are generally the result of changes in the number of funded research projects as
well as the timing and performance of contract benchmarks.
INTEREST INCOME. Interest income was $2.4 million, $1.8 million and $1.7
million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Interest income during 1997
increased primarily as a result of investing the proceeds from the Company's
sale in the third quarter of $80 million of 6 1/4% Convertible Subordinated
Debentures due 2004 (the "Debentures"). Interest income generally fluctuates as
a result of the average amount of cash available for investment and prevailing
interest rates.
COST OF GOODS SOLD. Cost of goods sold was $19.8 million, or 22% of product
revenues, $18.3 million, or 23% of product revenues, and $13.2 million, or 23%
of product revenues, in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The increase in cost
of goods sold for 1997 was primarily due to increased sales of the Company's
products. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of product revenues
for 1997 was primarily due to a reduction in the average manufacturing cost of
products sold by the Company. The decrease was partially offset by a reduction
in the average revenue per vial of product sold primarily due to (i) a
substantial appreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to leading European
currencies and (ii) increased sales of AmBisome to Fujisawa USA, Inc.
("Fujisawa") at cost in connection with the October 1, 1997 sales launch of
AmBisome in the U.S. Pursuant to an agreement between the two firms, the Company
and Fujisawa co-promote AmBisome in the United States and the Company sells
AmBisome to Fujisawa at cost for sale in the U.S. In addition, the Company
receives 20% of the gross profits from all U.S. sales which the Company records
as royalty income. As the Company's unit sales of AmBisome to Fujisawa increase
as a percentage of total AmBisome sales, the cost of goods sold as a percentage
of revenues is expected to increase. In 1995, the Company recorded a charge of
$932,000 for certain AmBisome lots produced in prior years which subsequently
failed to pass the Company's quality control specifications. Cost of goods sold
consists primarily of raw materials, allocation of overhead, labor and equipment
costs and charges associated with services provided by outside vendors.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. Research and development expenses
increased 11% to $53.0 million, 28% to $47.8 million and 18% to $37.4 million
for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The increase in research and development
expenses is substantially attributable to increased product development and
research activities and related increases in personnel. In particular, the
increase for 1997 is also attributable to (i) a charge of $1.1 million for
validation expenses related to product scale-up; (ii) an expense of $1.3 million
31
<PAGE> 33
related to the write off of capitalized purchased technology, which the Company
had been amortizing over a four-year period, but which the Company has decided
not to pursue; (iii) $622,000 in reorganization expenses related to research and
development consolidation activities, including certain staff reductions; (iv)
expanded clinical trial activity for the Company's products; (v) additional
preclinical spending on aptamer drug candidates developed using the SELEX
process, the Company's proprietary combinatorial chemistry technology; and (vi)
costs associated with developing alternative presentations of AmBisome. In 1996,
the Company had a charge to research and development of $1.2 million in
connection with a write down of an investment that the Company holds in a
biotechnology company, an expense of $1.0 million in connection with the
Company's decentralization of its medical/regulatory operations in Europe and an
expense of $1.2 million in connection with the acquisition of additional
laboratory facilities. In 1997, $2.4 million of research expenses was sponsored
by third parties, as compared to $1.2 million and $2.1 million in 1996 and 1995,
respectively. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries
and benefits for scientific, regulatory, quality control and pilot manufacturing
personnel and consultants; supplies; occupancy costs; and depreciation of
laboratory equipment and facilities.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased 5% to $45.0 million, 22% to $42.9 million and
60% to $35.3 million, or 50%, 53% and 61% of product revenues, in 1997, 1996 and
1995, respectively. The increase for 1997 is primarily related to (i) increased
expenses in connection with the continued expansion of the Company's marketing
operations and (ii) a charge of $309,000 related to a warrant issued in
connection with a $15.0 million revolving line of credit entered into by the
Company. The increase for 1996 primarily related to (a) the expansion of the
Company's marketing efforts, in particular, in connection with the launch of
DaunoXome and the continued expansion of the Company's international operations;
(b) an expense of $741,000 in connection with the termination of distribution
agreements in Australia and France; and (c) an increase of $520,000 in the
Company's allowance for doubtful accounts due to an increase in accounts
receivable resulting primarily from increased sales of the Company's products.
The increase for 1995 was primarily due to (w) merger-related costs of $2.7
million; (x) costs due to expansion of the Company's sales and marketing
distribution network of $4.2 million, including establishment of a sales force
in the U.S. in anticipation of final marketing approval for DaunoXome; (y) a
$2.4 million note receivable allowance relating to a loan previously made to
Phytogen Life Sciences Inc., a Canadian company in which the Company owns a
minority interest; and (z) $584,000 related to the cost of a registration
statement filed in September 1995 for the sale of the Company's common stock,
which was withdrawn in October 1995. The 1995 increase was also due to other
expenses incurred in connection with increased sales of AmBisome, including
expenses related to the Company's European operations and other corporate
matters. In addition, the Company recognized foreign exchange gains (losses) of
approximately ($287,000), ($362,000) and $371,000 in 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AND RELATED EXPENSES. For the year ended December 31,
1997, the Company reported litigation settlement and related expenses of $16.0
million compared to $2.0 million and $0 for 1996 and 1995, respectively. The
increase for 1997 was primarily related to the August 11, 1997 settlement
between the Company and The Liposome Company, Inc. ("TLC") in which the two
companies agreed to dismiss all legal proceedings in connection with two U.S.
patents and their international counterparts held by TLC (the "Patent
Litigation"). Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company made an
initial payment to TLC of $1.75 million and is required to make future payments
based on AmBisome sales. Because the payments are subject to certain minimum and
maximum payments, the Company recorded accounting charges in 1997 of $11.8
million, of which $10.0 million represented the net present value of all future
minimum payments it is required to make and $1.75 million represented the cash
payment in the third quarter of 1997. The Company does not expect the difference
between its future minimum and maximum payments to TLC to be material. During
1997, the Company had $4.2 million in additional expenses related to the Patent
Litigation.
INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense was $4.4 million, $1.6 million and $1.1
million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The increase for 1997 was
primarily due to interest payable by the Company on the Debentures and the
Company's bank borrowings. The increase for 1996 was primarily due to interest
payable under the term loan agreement for $10.0 million entered into by the
Company in June 1996 and additional
32
<PAGE> 34
borrowings in connection with several equipment lease arrangements. As a result
of the interest payable on the Debentures, the Company's interest expense in the
next two years is expected to be substantially greater than in periods prior to
the issuance of the Debentures.
NET LOSS. The Company reported a net loss for 1997 of $43.9 million, or
$1.65 per share, compared to a net loss of $23.0 million, or $0.88 per share,
and a net loss of $36.6 million, or $1.57 per share, for 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The net loss for 1995 included a one-time, non-cash charge of
$11.8 million for purchased research and development in connection with the
Supragen, Inc. acquisition.
PATENT MATTERS
The Company believes that there will continue to be significant litigation
in the pharmaceutical industry regarding patents and other intellectual property
rights, but cannot predict the likelihood of it being involved in any disputes.
Any new litigation could consume a substantial portion of the Company's
resources regardless of the outcome of such litigation.
On August 11, 1997, the Company and TLC reached a settlement in which the
two companies agreed to dismiss all legal proceedings involving TLC's reexamined
U.S. Patent No. 4,880,635 (the "TLC '635 Patent") and U.S. Patent No. 5,578,320
(the "TLC '320 Patent") and their international counterparts. The legal
proceedings related to whether AmBisome, the Company's liposomal formulation of
amphotericin B, infringed TLC's patents because of the manner in which it is
freeze dried (lyophilized). In the settlement agreement between the parties (the
"Settlement Agreement"), TLC agreed that it would not sue the Company in
connection with the worldwide production and sales of AmBisome and a worldwide
right to use the TLC '635 Patent and the TLC '320 Patent (collectively, the "TLC
Patents").
The Company originally initiated legal proceedings on May 17, 1993, when it
filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of
Delaware against TLC asking the court to declare the TLC '635 Patent invalid,
unenforceable and not infringed following allegations by TLC that AmBisome
infringes the TLC '635 Patent because of the manner in which it is freeze dried.
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware stayed the lawsuit
pending the outcome of a reexamination of the TLC '635 Patent instituted by TLC
in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). On July 2, 1996, certain
amended claims were allowed by the USPTO. The stay was lifted on July 11, 1996
and an amended complaint was filed by the Company on July 29, 1996. On August
16, 1996, TLC answered the amended complaint and filed a counterclaim against
the Company for damages and an injunction based on infringement of the
reexamined patent. On January 17, 1997, TLC filed an amended complaint asserting
that the Company's method of lyophilizing AmBisome also infringed the TLC '320
Patent, which was granted by the USPTO to TLC on November 26, 1996. The TLC '635
Patent and the TLC '320 Patent cover essentially the same subject matter. On
February 26, 1997, the Company filed an amended and supplemental complaint
asserting antitrust and business tort actions against TLC. The amended complaint
stated that TLC had fraudulently obtained the TLC Patents by withholding
information from, and intentionally misleading, the USPTO and had attempted to
use the TLC Patents in order to injure NeXstar Pharmaceuticals and competition
generally, including attempting to affect the Company's proposed stock offering
in June 1996. In connection with the Settlement Agreement, the parties dismissed
all claims.
In addition, the Company had opposed the grant to TLC of the European and
Japanese patents that are counterparts of the TLC Patents. TLC initiated legal
actions against the Company on October 18, 1996 in the Chancery Division of the
Patents Court in the United Kingdom, on November 4, 1996 in the Regional Court
of The Hague, The Netherlands and on October 18, 1996 in the Regional
Court -- Dusseldorf in Germany for alleged infringement of the respective
national counterparts to the TLC Patents. In connection with each suit, TLC
sought an injunction and damages. In connection with the Settlement Agreement,
the three European lawsuits were dismissed and the Company withdrew its
opposition in the European and Japanese patent offices to the grant of the
applicable counterparts to the TLC Patents.
33
<PAGE> 35
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company's cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities position
at December 31, 1997 was $64.3 million compared to $42.0 million on December 31,
1996. The $22.3 million increase in cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities position was primarily the result of the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Net loss................................................ $(43,910,000)
Depreciation and amortization........................... 12,734,000
Accrued patent litigation settlement and related
expenses.............................................. 9,030,000
Other non-cash items.................................... 58,000
Working capital......................................... (9,121,000)
------------
Net cash used in operating activities................. $(31,209,000)
Investment in property, plant and equipment............. (10,484,000)
Proceeds from sale of investment in life science
enterprise............................................ 2,683,000
Payments on short-term borrowings, net.................. (7,902,000)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions............... 2,217,000
Payments on capital lease obligations................... (4,660,000)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt................ 18,108,000
Repayments on long-term debt............................ (24,634,000)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible subordinated
debentures, net....................................... 77,200,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net................. 1,841,000
Other................................................... (836,000)
------------
Total increase in cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities.............................. $ 22,324,000
============
</TABLE>
The Company invests its cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
in interest-bearing investment grade securities.
The Company's accounts receivable balance at December 31, 1997 was $34.6
million as compared to $30.0 million on December 31, 1996. The growth in
receivables was primarily due to increased sales of AmBisome and proportionately
increased sales of the Company's products in countries in which payments tend to
be slower than the average payment periods historically experienced by the
Company. Payment practices vary significantly between countries and increased
sales in countries in which payments tend to be slower, often as a result of the
pace at which governmental entities reimburse the Company's customers, have in
the past increased, and in the future may increase, the average length that
accounts receivable are outstanding and may increase the financial risk of
certain of the Company's customers. In particular, the Company's Greek
distributor has historically been slow in making payments to the Company because
of the slowness of government-funded institutions in making payments to it.
During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Greek government issued bonds as payment
for many of the accounts which it owed to pharmaceutical companies. In
connection with the bond issuance, the Company's Greek distributor repaid $6.8
million of accounts receivable to the Company in the fourth quarter of 1997 and
the first quarter through March 15, 1998. However, the amount of accounts
receivable owed to the Company by the Greek distributor and certain governmental
entities remains significant. The Company continually seeks improvements in its
collection process to maximize its cash flow from product sales in a timely
manner.
As of December 31, 1997, the Company's inventory balance was $14.6 million
compared to $15.6 million as of December 31, 1996.
For the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company had proceeds from
sale-leaseback transactions of $2.2 million related to the purchase of capital
equipment and $3.1 million in proceeds from facilities improvement and capital
equipment financing transactions. As of December 31, 1997, $5.4 million was
available under agreements relating to the financing of manufacturing equipment,
general laboratory and scientific equipment, office equipment, furniture and
fixtures and facility improvements.
34
<PAGE> 36
In June 1997, the Company sold all of its holdings in a life science
enterprise for $2.7 million following that entity's initial public offering. As
a result of the sale, the Company recorded a loss of $26,000. In addition, for
the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company had a non-cash expense of $1.3
million related to the write off of capitalized purchased technology which the
Company had been amortizing over a four-year period, but which the Company has
decided not to pursue.
During the third quarter of 1997, the Company completed the sale of $80
million of 6 1/4% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2004 (the
"Debentures") in a private offering to SBC Warburg Inc. and Oppenheimer & Co.,
Inc. (the "Initial Purchasers"). The Company used the net proceeds of $77.2
million (after deducting a 3% commission of $2.4 million received by the Initial
Purchasers and transaction expenses of approximately $400,000) from the sale of
the Debentures, in part, to repay outstanding bank borrowings of the Company in
the principal amount of $28.6 million, including repaying (a) the outstanding
principal amount of $7.5 million under a term loan (the "Term Loan"); (b) the
outstanding principal balance of $10.0 million under a revolving line of credit
(the "Credit Line") pursuant to which the Company was permitted to borrow up to
$15.0 million; and (c) the outstanding principal amount of $11.1 million under a
credit agreement (the "Accounts Receivable Loan") pursuant to which the Company
and certain of its subsidiaries were permitted to borrow up to $15.0 million,
with the borrowings being collateralized by certain of the non-U.S. accounts
receivable of the Company and the subsidiaries. Following the repayment of the
bank borrowings, the Term Loan and the Credit Line were terminated.
In September 1997, the Company terminated the Accounts Receivable Loan and
simultaneously entered into a $10.0 million unsecured line of credit (the
"Credit Agreement") with the same financial institution. As of December 31,
1997, the Company had borrowings of $1.75 million under the Credit Agreement
with an average interest rate of 8.25%. The Credit Agreement, which includes a
foreign exchange facility, terminates on September 1, 1998. Under the terms of
the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain certain financial
ratios and there are limitations on the Company's ability to incur additional
debt or to engage in certain significant transactions.
In March 1997, the Company substantially restructured its bank financing by
(a) terminating an unsecured line of credit pursuant to which it had a right to
borrow up to $10.0 million, (b) entering into the Accounts Receivable Loan and
(c) entering into the Credit Line.
In May 1996, the Company's Spanish subsidiary entered into an agreement to
borrow up to 500 million Spanish Pesetas (approximately $3.3 million on December
31, 1997) with such borrowing being secured by the subsidiary's accounts
receivable. In February 1997, the agreement was amended to increase the amount
that the subsidiary may borrow to 750 million Spanish Pesetas (approximately
$4.9 million on December 31, 1997). In connection with the agreement, the
Company maintains $2.0 million in an unrestricted account. As of December 31,
1997, the subsidiary had borrowings of 500 million Spanish Pesetas
(approximately $3.3 million on December 31, 1997) under the agreement. The
Company's Spanish subsidiary has notified the lender that it will repay and
terminate the loan, which is due in May 1998, in April 1998.
On August 11, 1997, the Company and The Liposome Company, Inc. ("TLC")
reached a settlement in connection with their patent litigation. In 1997, the
Company recorded an accounting charge in connection with the settlement of $11.8
million of which $1.75 million represents a payment in the third quarter of 1997
and the remainder represents the net present value of all future minimum
payments required to be made by the Company to TLC. See "-- Results of
Operations -- Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995."
On September 29, 1997, the Company completed the acquisition of a toll
manufacturing facility in Dublin, Ireland in which a contract manufacturer had
previously performed labeling and quality control release for the Company's
products in the European Union (the "EU") and elsewhere. The total acquisition
price was one million Irish Punts (approximately $1.5 million on September 30,
1997). Upon the completion of the acquisition, the Company began performing its
own quality control release at this facility for distribution in the EU and
elsewhere. The Company anticipates significant expenditures during the first
half of 1998 in connection with developing and equipping additional facilities.
35
<PAGE> 37
The Company believes that it is advisable to augment its cash in order to
fund all of its activities, including potential product acquisitions. Therefore,
the Company will consider raising cash whenever market conditions are favorable.
Such capital may be raised through additional public or private financing, as
well as collaborative relationships, borrowings and other available sources. In
addition, in the course of its business, the Company evaluates products and
technologies held by third parties which, if acquired, could result in the
development of product candidates by the Company or which complement
technologies currently being developed by the Company. The Company expects from
time to time to be involved in discussions with other entities concerning the
Company's potential acquisition of rights to additional pharmaceutical products.
In the event that the Company acquires such products or third-party
technologies, the Company may find it necessary or advisable to obtain
additional funding.
The Company's future capital requirements will be substantial and will
depend on, and could increase as a result of, many factors, including progress
of the Company's research, drug discovery and development programs; whether the
Company acquires interests in products currently held by third parties; the
results and costs of preclinical and clinical testing of the Company's products,
if developed; the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals; the
costs involved in filing, prosecuting and enforcing patent claims; competing
technological and market developments; the Company's success in entering into
collaborative agreements; changes in collaborative research relationships; the
costs associated with potential commercialization of its products, if any,
including the development of additional manufacturing, marketing and sales
capabilities; the cost and availability of third-party financing for capital
expenditures; and administrative and legal expenses. In particular, the Company
expects to have significant cash requirements in the near future as a result of,
but not limited to, increased clinical studies which are required in order to
expand the indications and markets for the Company's products. There can be no
assurance that additional or sufficient financing will be available, or, if
available, that it will be available on acceptable terms. If additional funds
are raised by issuing equity securities of the Company, dilution to then
existing stockholders may result. If adequate funds are not available, the
Company may be required to significantly curtail one or more of its research and
development programs or commercialization efforts or obtain funds through
arrangements with collaborative partners or others on less favorable terms than
might otherwise be available.
YEAR 2000 ISSUE
The Company has completed a review of its internal computer systems and is
conducting a review of the external computer systems on which it relies to
determine what actions will be necessary or appropriate in connection with the
"Year 2000 Issue." The Year 2000 Issue is the result of computer programs which
were written using two digits rather than four to signify a year (i.e., the year
1997 is denoted "97" and not "1997"). Computer programs written using only two
digits may recognize the year 2000 as the year 1900. This could result in a
system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations, including,
among other things, a temporary inability to process transactions, send invoices
or engage in similar activities.
As a result of its review, the Company has determined:
(i) Its internal computer systems are not materially affected by the Year
2000 Issue. This is a result of (a) the newness of the Company's computer
systems (most of its software is written using four digits for years), (b) the
Company's reliance primarily on personal computers and not on mainframes for
most of its computing needs and (c) the nature of the Company's business (i.e.,
the Company is neither a consumer nor financial-based business).
(ii) Third parties whose computer systems may affect the Company's
operations, to the Company's knowledge, are attempting to address their own Year
2000 Issues.
The Company has requested, and will continue to seek, information from
third-party entities on which it relies, certifying that their computer systems
will not negatively affect the Company's operations. The Company currently
relies on third-party vendors in connection with much of its payroll and
benefits systems. In addition, the Company could be affected by the failure of
various governmental entities to appropriately address the Year 2000 Issue. It
is the Company's belief that the costs to the Company as a result of the Year
2000 Issue will be nominal, but no assurance can be given that there will not be
some unforeseen issue, in
36
<PAGE> 38
particular, in connection with third-parties computer systems, that may
materially affect the Company's operations.
RECENT EVENTS
During 1996, the Company licensed the right to develop and market AmBisome
in Japan to Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo"). Under the terms of
the license, Sumitomo is required to make payments to the Company if certain
clinical and commercial milestones are met and to pay the Company royalties on
all Japanese sales of AmBisome. In March 1998, Sumitomo notified the Company
that all of the conditions necessary for the payment of a $3.0 million (less
taxes to be withheld of $300,000) milestone have been fulfilled. Under the terms
of the license, Sumitomo is also required to make a milestone payment to the
Company if AmBisome is approved for sale in Japan.
RISK FACTORS
The following risk factors should be read in conjunction with information
appearing elsewhere in or incorporated by reference in this Report. Special
Note: Certain statements set forth below constitute "forward-looking statements"
that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ
materially from the results discussed in the "forward-looking statements." See
"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" on page 2 for additional
factors relating to such statements.
DEPENDENCE ON PRINCIPAL PRODUCT
The Company has relied on sales of AmBisome for most of its product
revenues with a substantial majority of those sales occurring in European
countries. A reduction in demand for, or revenues from, AmBisome or the failure
to obtain additional regulatory approvals could have a material adverse effect
on the Company's results of operations. Regulatory approvals will be needed to
expand the indications for which AmBisome may be marketed in the countries where
it is already approved. There can be no assurance as to whether or when such
approvals will be obtained. See "Business -- Clinical Trials, Preclinical Trials
and Regulatory Status -- AmBisome" in Part I of this Report.
The Company has only one other product, DaunoXome, that has received
regulatory approvals. Sales to date for DaunoXome have been limited and there
can be no assurance as to the volume of sales that will be achieved. The Company
will seek to expand the market for DaunoXome by obtaining approvals for
indications in addition to Kaposi's sarcoma. However, there can be no assurance
that the drug will be effective for the treatment of other diseases or that such
additional approvals will be obtained. See "Business -- Clinical Trials,
Preclinical Trials and Regulatory Status -- DaunoXome" in Part I of this Report.
The Company has one other product that has reached the clinical development
stage, MiKasome, for which Phase II clinical trials have been initiated in the
United States. While the results of animal and Phase I clinical trials have been
encouraging, those results may not be indicative of efficacy, and further
clinical trials with MiKasome may not achieve the desired result, may reveal
unduly harmful side effects or may show the drug to be less efficacious than
other drug entities or delivery systems for the desired indication. No assurance
can be given that MiKasome will be more effective than existing drugs or other
technologies that may be developed in the future or that MiKasome will reach
commercialization or be accepted by the medical community. See
"Business -- Clinical Trials, Preclinical Trials and Regulatory
Status -- MiKasome" in Part I of this Report.
The Company's other potential products that are based on liposomal or other
technologies are in development, and there can be no assurance that such
potential products will be successfully developed, achieve therapeutic efficacy,
be approved by regulatory authorities or be successfully marketed. Nor can there
be any assurance that the Company will be able to develop any additional
products, that the approval of its current products will not be revoked or that
named-patient purchases will be permitted to continue in countries that have not
granted approval for AmBisome or DaunoXome.
37
<PAGE> 39
TECHNOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY
A significant portion of the Company's research is focused upon the
discovery and development of novel pharmaceuticals based upon oligonucleotides.
There can be no assurance that any of the Company's approaches to drug discovery
will result in commercially successful drugs. Although the Company has
demonstrated an ability to efficiently identify oligonucleotides that bind with
high affinity to and inhibit selected molecular targets, the Company has not
successfully demonstrated the efficacy of such oligonucleotides as human
therapeutic agents, nor have any human clinical trials been initiated with
products based upon such oligonucleotides. There remain numerous challenges
which the Company must address to successfully develop commercial products from
the drug candidates which it identifies through its SELEX or Parallel SELEX
processes. These challenges include developing and implementing appropriate
clinical protocols and developing manufacturing methods which are efficient,
cost-effective and capable of meeting stringent regulatory standards. In
addition, although many targets with potential therapeutic significance have
already been identified, there can be no assurance that the targets selected by
the Company will ultimately prove to have the requisite medical significance
such that a compound binding tightly to such target will prove to be a useful
pharmaceutical product. There can be no assurance that the Company will
successfully address any of these or other challenges that may arise in the
course of its research and development.
In addition to developing products based on its liposome, SELEX process and
Parallel SELEX process technologies, the Company has a longer-term strategy of
providing pharmaceuticals to treat patients with cancer, infectious diseases and
hematological disorders. However, there can be no assurance that the Company
will be successful in developing marketable products using its technologies or
will have the scientific or financial resources necessary to develop all of the
potential drug candidates or technologies which its scientists may discover or
the Company may acquire. See "Business" in Part I of this Report.
RISK OF CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS
A substantial majority of the Company's product sales have occurred in
Europe with 55% of the Company's product sales for the year ending December 31,
1997 occurring in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and Spain. In most
significant European markets, the Company prices AmBisome and DaunoXome in the
currency of the country in which such products are sold. Accordingly, the prices
of such products in U.S. Dollars will vary as the value of the U.S. Dollar
fluctuates against such local currencies. Increases in the value of the U.S.
Dollar against such currencies, as occurred during 1997, may reduce the U.S.
Dollar return to the Company on the sale of its products. Furthermore, there can
be no assurance that significant additional fluctuations in foreign currency
values will not occur that will create substantial differences in the relative
prices of the Company's products in different countries. In addition, although
the Company implements hedging techniques with respect to its foreign currency
accounts receivable and accounts payable, these techniques do not eliminate the
effects of foreign currency fluctuations with respect to anticipated revenues,
and therefore the Company's future results will continue to be affected by
foreign currency fluctuations. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
HISTORY OF LOSSES; FUTURE CAPITAL NEEDS
The Company has incurred substantial losses during its history. At December
31, 1997, the Company's accumulated deficit was $169.9 million. There can be no
assurance that the Company will ever achieve or maintain profitability. In
addition, the Company's earnings have historically not been sufficient to cover
its fixed charges from operations. Earnings (not taking into account the effect
of taxes) were deficient by $43.6 million, $22.1 million, $36.4 million and
$16.0 million for each of the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, 1995 and
1994, respectively. Additionally, the Company's future capital needs will be
substantial and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
obtain the capital necessary to fund all of its necessary or advisable
operations. In the event of a change in control of the Company or the Company's
common stock no longer being listed or approved for trading on a national
exchange or an over-the-counter market (collectively, a "Repurchase Event"), the
holders of the Company's $80 million of 6 1/4% Convertible Subordinated
Debentures due 2004 (the "Debentures") can require the Company to repurchase the
Debentures. If a Repurchase Event occurs, the Company may have insufficient cash
with which to repurchase
38
<PAGE> 40
the Debentures. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations."
RELIANCE ON PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
The Company's success depends in part on its ability to continue to obtain
patent protection in the United States and other countries for its technologies
and the products, if any, resulting from the application of such technologies.
The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms, including the
Company, are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. The
Company intends to continue to file applications as appropriate for patents
covering its technologies and any products resulting from the application of
such technologies. No assurance can be given that patents will issue from any of
the Company's applications or that patents will issue in connection with
technology licensed by the Company or, if patents do issue, that the claims
allowed will be sufficiently broad to protect the Company's proprietary rights,
that such patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that
the rights granted pursuant to such patents will provide competitive advantages
to the Company.
The commercial success of the Company will also depend in part on the
Company not infringing patents or proprietary rights of third parties nor
breaching any technology licenses that relate to the Company's technologies and
products. A number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and research
and academic institutions have developed technologies, filed patent applications
or received patents on various technologies that may be related to the Company's
business. In addition, such entities may file applications for or be issued
future patents with respect to technology potentially necessary or useful to the
Company. The Company is aware of third parties that have filed patent
applications with claims allegedly covering technologies similar to the basic
aspects of the Company's liposomal technology and SELEX process. Some of these
technologies, applications or patents may conflict with the Company's
technologies and existing or future patents, if any, or patent applications.
Such conflict could limit the scope of the patents that NeXstar Pharmaceuticals
has obtained or may be able to obtain or result in the Company's patent
applications failing to issue as patents. In addition, if patents that cover the
Company's activities are issued to other companies, there can be no assurance
that NeXstar Pharmaceuticals would be able to obtain licenses to these patents
at a reasonable cost, or at all, or be able to develop or obtain alternative
technology. In addition, as more patents are issued to third parties, the risk
increases that the Company's products may give rise to claims that they infringe
the patents of others. See "Business -- Patents, Trade Secrets and Licenses" in
Part I of this Report.
LITIGATION RISKS RELATED TO PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
The Company believes that its patents and patent applications are soundly
based, but the extent of protection may vary in different countries. No
assurance can be given that any patent will provide commercially significant
protection or will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Litigation
could be necessary to protect the Company's patent position, which would result
in substantial cost to, and diversion of efforts by, the Company.
Additionally, a number of other patents have issued to other persons, some
to competitors, relating to technology similar to that used by the Company. Both
the Company and certain of its competitors have filed oppositions against each
other as to patents granted by the European Patent Office and patents granted by
the Japanese Patent Office. The Liposome Company, Inc. ("TLC") and the
University of California each have patents or patent applications relating to
active drug loading techniques that the owners could claim are used in the
manufacture of products such as DaunoXome. The Company has opposed the grant of
a European and a Japanese patent owned by TLC and is involved in an interference
proceeding with a U.S. patent application owned by the University of California
relating to such loading technology.
Competitors or other patent holders could bring legal actions against the
Company involving the Company's patents, patent applications or rights to use
proprietary technology. If any actions are successful, in addition to any
potential liability for damages, the Company could be enjoined from selling the
affected product, or be required to obtain a license in order to continue to
manufacture or market the product. There can be no assurance that the Company
would prevail in any such action or that any license required under any
39
<PAGE> 41
such patent would be made available on acceptable terms, if at all. There has
been, and the Company believes that there will continue to be, significant
litigation in the pharmaceutical industry regarding patent and other
intellectual property rights. Any additional litigation could consume a
substantial portion of the Company's resources regardless of the outcome. See
"Business -- Patents, Trade Secrets and Licenses" and "Legal Proceedings" in
Part I of this Report.
MANUFACTURING RISKS
The manufacture of AmBisome and DaunoXome involves a number of technical
steps and requires meeting stringent quality control specifications imposed by
government regulatory bodies and by the Company itself. Additionally, such
products can only be manufactured in facilities that comply with applicable
regulatory standards. Consequently, the Company may be unable to quickly and
efficiently replace its manufacturing capacity in the event that it cannot
manufacture its products at one or more of its facilities. In the event of a
natural disaster (including an earthquake), equipment failure, strike or other
difficulty, the Company may be unable to manufacture its products in a manner
necessary to fulfill the demand for the products.
The Company depends on single suppliers for high quality amphotericin B,
daunorubicin HCl and high quality cholesterol, each of which is used in the
Company's manufacture of its liposome products. Additional suppliers of these
components are presently under evaluation. If any of these materials becomes
unavailable from its respective supplier, the Company would be unable to
manufacture at least some of its liposome products until alternative sources of
supply are obtained and the substitution of such replacement supplies has been
granted by the appropriate regulatory authorities. The Company believes that
alternative supplies of such materials are or will become available at
reasonable prices. However, no assurance as to the availability of such supplies
can be given.
While the Company has experience in manufacturing drug products based on
liposome technologies, it lacks experience in the manufacture of other
pharmaceuticals, including oligonucleotide-based products. The Company has
leased 5,260 square feet and 9,800 square feet of space in Boulder, Colorado for
use as a bulk pharmaceutical manufacturing facility and as a development lab and
scale-up facility, respectively, in connection with compounds derived using the
SELEX process. The manufacturing facility has not been validated for the
production of any product and there can be no assurance that it will ultimately
obtain "current Good Manufacturing Practices" status. The Company has not yet
determined which, if any, drug substances it will attempt to develop or produce
at the facilities, and there is no assurance that any drug substance selected
for development and/or production at the facilities will be suitable for
production on a larger scale. To the extent that the Company's current
facilities are unsuitable for the manufacture on an adequate scale of new drug
substances developed by the Company, the Company will need to develop additional
facilities or contract with third parties for the manufacture of drug
substances, if any, that it may develop for its own account or in connection
with collaborative arrangements in which it has retained manufacturing rights.
If the Company is unable to develop needed manufacturing facilities or to obtain
or retain third-party manufacturing on acceptable terms, the Company's ability
to conduct preclinical and clinical testing will be adversely affected and it
will be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or supply commercial quantities
of products it may successfully develop. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be successful in the further development of its manufacturing
capabilities for its potential products. See "Business -- Manufacturing,"
"Business -- Government Regulation" and "Properties" in Part I of this Report.
In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company established a new business unit,
NeXstar Technology Products ("NTP"), to market specialty chemicals and process
technologies, as well as to manufacture any oligonucleotide-based drugs that
might be developed by the Company. To date, NTP's sales have been limited and no
assurance can be given that NTP will ever achieve substantial revenues or
profits or that it will be able to successfully compete against similar
businesses. In addition, NTP's success is expected to depend significantly upon
the further development of the Company's Product Anchored Sequential Synthesis
("PASS") technology for synthesizing oligonucleotides. No assurance can be given
that the PASS technology will ultimately prove successful in the economic
large-scale manufacture of oligonucleotides, including drugs
40
<PAGE> 42
developed by the Company, if any, or that other technologies developed by other
entities will not prove to be more commercially successful.
MARKETING RISKS
The Company has formed a network of subsidiaries in Europe and a subsidiary
in Australia to promote and sell its products. The Company has also entered into
a number of agreements with distributors for the promotion, sale and/or
distribution of AmBisome and DaunoXome. For some of these distributors, the
Company's products represent a significant percentage of total sales. The
Company competes with many other companies that currently have extensive and
well-funded marketing and sales operations. There can be no assurance that
either the Company's marketing or sales efforts will compete successfully
against other companies. See "Business -- Marketing" and
"Business -- Competition" in Part I of this Report.
The Company's rights to market AmBisome are subject to an agreement between
the Company and Fujisawa USA, Inc. ("Fujisawa"). Under the terms of the
agreement, as amended, the Company has the marketing rights to AmBisome in all
countries except the United States and Canada, subject to the Company's
obligation to pay royalties in connection with sales in most significant Asian
markets, including Japan. Additionally, the Company and Fujisawa co-promote
AmBisome in the United States and the Company manufactures AmBisome for sale in
the U.S. The Company is reimbursed for the cost of the product sold to Fujisawa
and receives 20% of the gross profits from the sales of AmBisome in the United
States. In the event that the Company and Fujisawa are unable to cooperate in
connection with the promotion of the product, the Company's potential revenues
from the sale of AmBisome in the U.S. may be substantially reduced.
COMPETITION
See "Business -- Competition" in Part I of this Report.
UNCERTAINTY OF HEALTH CARE REIMBURSEMENT
The Company's ability to commercialize its current and any future products
depends in part on the extent to which reimbursement for the cost of such
products and related treatments are available from government health agencies,
private health insurers and other third-party payers. Payers are increasingly
challenging the price and cost effectiveness of medical products. Significant
uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved health care
products, and there can be no assurance that adequate third-party coverage will
be available for the Company to obtain satisfactory price levels for its
products. Government and other third-party payers are increasingly attempting to
contain health care costs by a variety of means, including limiting both the
degree of coverage (including limiting payment for off-label uses) and the level
of reimbursement for therapeutic products or new indications for therapeutic
products. In addition, the Company's ability to sell a product in certain
countries may depend on such product being included, or continuing to be
included, on a government-approved reimbursement list. In January 1998, the
Greek government stated that it will reduce by approximately 40% the number of
drugs for which it is willing to provide reimbursement for pharmacy level
purchases beginning April 1, 1998. AmBisome is among the products to be deleted
from this reimbursement list. Since AmBisome is sold directly to Greek
hospitals, which are not affected by the government's action, the Company does
not expect Greek sales of AmBisome to be significantly affected. However, the
Company is actively attempting to have AmBisome reincluded as a reimbursable
drug to pharmacies in Greece, and no assurance can be given that this action by
the Greek government or any future actions will not affect AmBisome sales. If
adequate coverage and reimbursement levels are not provided by government and
third-party payers for use of the Company's existing and potential products, the
market acceptance of these products would be adversely affected.
PRICING CONSTRAINTS
The Company is subject to the risk of parallel imports, governmental
regulation of prices and potential price competition. Under European Union
("EU") laws, the Company is limited in its ability to restrict the
41
<PAGE> 43
distributors of its products and third parties from selling the Company's
products in other countries when customers from such other countries offer to
buy the product from such distributors or third parties. Differing product
prices among countries occur in part because many foreign countries require
regulatory approval of prices. In particular, certain countries will condition
their approval of a product on the agreement of the seller not to sell that
product for more than a certain price in the country. There can be no assurance
that any regulatory action reducing the price of AmBisome or DaunoXome in any
one country will not have the practical effect of requiring the Company to
correspondingly reduce its prices in other countries as a result of
government-mandated price reductions or price pressures due to parallel
importing. Additionally, the price set for one of the Company's products in a
given country for competitive reasons may affect that product's prices
worldwide. The Company has significant sales in EU countries which are expected
to replace their currencies with a unified currency. The implementation of this
unified currency could lead to more unified prices in these countries which
could have the effect of lowering the average sales price for the Company's
products. If the Company is successful in developing additional products or
obtaining approval for additional indications for its current drugs, the Company
may also face increased price competition from potential competitors, including
European-based companies. See "Business -- Competition" and
"Business -- Government Regulation" in Part I of this Report.
IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT REGULATION
See "Business -- Government Regulation" in Part I of this Report.
POTENTIAL PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS AND UNINSURED RISKS
Although the Company is not currently a party to any product liability
litigation, the use of any of the Company's products or potential products in
clinical trials and the sale of such products may expose the Company to
liability claims. These claims may be made directly by consumers, health care
providers, pharmaceutical companies or others selling such products. While the
Company currently has liability insurance in amounts that it believes to be
adequate for its business as currently conducted, such insurance is expensive
and may be difficult (or impossible) to obtain in the future. In the event
liability insurance becomes unobtainable, the Company's ability to clinically
test and to market its products could be significantly impaired. Moreover, the
amount and scope of any coverage may be inadequate to protect the Company in the
event of a successful product liability claim.
As additional products are approved in the U.S. and to the extent of the
growth in sales by NeXstar Technology Products in the United States, the Company
will have significantly greater risk in connection with product liability claims
due to the greater frequency of lawsuits and higher damages awarded in courts in
the United States as opposed to most other countries. The Company is required by
governmental regulations to test its products even after they have been sold and
used by patients. As a result of such tests, the Company may be required to, or
may determine that, it should recall products when most of such products have
already been sold or used. Such later testing and product recalls may increase
the Company's potential exposure to product liability claims.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
See "Business -- Government Regulation" in Part I of this Report.
VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE
The market prices for securities of biopharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies, including the Company, have been highly volatile, and it is likely
that the market price of the Company's common stock will continue to be highly
volatile. Announcements of technological innovations or new commercial products
by the Company, its collaborative partners or its present or potential
competitors, announcements by the Company or its present or potential
competitors of results in preclinical testing and clinical trials, developments
or disputes concerning patent or proprietary rights, developments in the
Company's relationships with its collaborative partners, adverse litigation,
changes in reimbursement policies, adverse legislation, regulatory decisions or
public concern regarding the safety, efficacy or other implications of the drugs
sought to be
42
<PAGE> 44
developed or biotechnology in general and economic and other external factors,
as well as period-to-period fluctuations in the Company's operating results have
had, and may continue to have, a significant impact on the market price of the
Company's common stock. See "Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters."
REGISTRATION RIGHTS, OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
As of March 17, 1998, the holders of 7,752,519 outstanding shares of the
Company's common stock were entitled to certain piggyback and demand
registration rights with respect to such shares. If such holders, by exercising
their demand registration rights, cause a large number of shares to be
registered and sold in the public market, such sales may have an adverse effect
on the market price for the common stock. In addition, if the Company is
required to include in a Company initiated registration shares held by such
holders pursuant to the exercise of their piggyback registration rights, the
sale of such shares may have an adverse effect on the Company's ability to raise
needed capital. As of March 17, 1998, there were warrants outstanding to
purchase an aggregate of 256,285 shares of common stock at a weighted average
exercise price of $11.55 per share. There are piggyback and/or demand
registration rights in connection with such warrants which can be exercised for
an aggregate of 197,484 shares. As of March 17, 1998, there were outstanding
stock options for an aggregate of 3,074,574 shares of the Company's common stock
at a weighted average exercise price of $12.65 per share. All of the Company's
currently outstanding shares of common stock have been registered (or are
registered for resale) pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") or may
be sold in the public market in reliance on Rule 144 under the Act, subject to
volume limitations in the case of affiliates of the Company and one other
stockholder.
INFLUENCE BY EXISTING STOCKHOLDER
Affiliates of E.M. Warburg, Pincus & Co., LLC ("Warburg") as of March 17,
1998 owned approximately 29.8% of the Company's outstanding common stock and a
warrant exercisable for an additional 125,000 shares of the Company's common
stock. As a result, Warburg may influence the Company's corporate actions,
including influencing elections and significant corporate events. One of the
Company's directors is a Senior Managing Director of Warburg.
RELIANCE ON RELATIONSHIPS
The Company has entered into collaborative arrangements pursuant to which
other companies are entitled to certain product, manufacturing, marketing and/or
royalty rights, including collaborative arrangements relating to aspects of the
SELEX process. Although the agreements with these companies provide for the
funding by such companies of certain research and development efforts conducted
by the Company, such funding may be terminated by such companies under certain
circumstances. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any of the Company's
current collaborative arrangements will be successful.
The Company may seek future collaborative relationships with corporate
partners to fund certain research and development expenses and to develop and
commercialize certain of its potential products. Further, the Company's receipt
of revenues from collaborative agreements will be affected by the timing of
efforts expended by the Company under existing agreements, as well as by the
timing of drug development programs of the Company's collaborators. There can be
no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate acceptable collaborative
arrangements in the future, or that such collaborative arrangements will be
successful. To the extent that the Company elects not to or is unable to
establish such relationships it could incur increased capital expenditures as it
is required to undertake research, development, marketing and manufacturing of
its proposed products at its own expense. In addition, there can be no assurance
that existing or future collaborative partners will have sufficient economic
motivation to continue their funding or to develop any products to which they
may have rights, or that such partners will not pursue alternative technologies
or attempt to develop alternative compounds either independently or in
collaboration with others. See "Business -- Collaborative Relationships and
License Agreements" in Part I of this Report.
43
<PAGE> 45
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Submitted elsewhere in this Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information involving the election of Directors is, in part, contained in
Part I of this Report under the caption "Executive Officers and Directors" and,
in addition, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive
proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 27,
1998, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Information concerning the Executive Officers of Registrant is contained in
Part I of this Report under the caption "Executive Officers and Directors" in
Part I of this Report.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information with respect to executive compensation is incorporated
herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 27, 1998, to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
May 27, 1998, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information with respect to certain relationships and related
transactions is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive
proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 27,
1998, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE IN
FORM 10-K
---------
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Auditors.............................. F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and
1996...................................................... F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.......................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.............. F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.......................... F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-6
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE> 46
2. INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required,
or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements or notes thereto.
3. EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
3.1 -- Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Registrant(1).
3.2 -- Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant(2).
4.1 -- Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to this Report).
4.2 -- Form of Common Stock certificate of the Registrant(2).
4.3 -- Indenture, dated as of July 31, 1997, between the
Registrant and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company as
Trustee, for the Registrant's 6 1/4% Convertible
Subordinated Debentures due 2004(3).
4.4 -- Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 31, 1997, among
the Registrant and SBC Warburg Inc. and Oppenheimer &
Co., Inc.(3).
10.1 -- License Agreement between University Research Corporation
and the Registrant, effective as of July 17, 1991, as
amended on October 26, 1992(4).
10.2 -- Amendment No. 2, effective April 5, 1996, and Amendment
No. 3, dated September 5, 1996, to the License Agreement
between University Research Corporation and the
Registrant, effective as of July 17, 1991, as amended on
October 26, 1992(5).
10.3 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among the Registrant, Warburg,
Pincus Investors, L.P., University Research Corporation
and Lawrence M. Gold, dated as of July 17, 1991, as
amended on December 4, 1992, and as amended by letter
agreement on November 19, 1993(4).
10.4 -- Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 1991, between the
Registrant and Lawrence M. Gold(4).
10.5 -- Letter Agreement, dated May 1, 1992, between the
Registrant and Patrick J. Mahaffy(4).
10.6 -- Master Equipment Lease Agreement between MMC/GATX
Partnership No. 1 and the Registrant, dated as of
November 23, 1992(4).
10.7 -- Research and License Agreement between Eli Lilly and
Company and the Registrant, effective as of September 15,
1992, and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of April 1,
1994(2).
10.8 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among the Registrant, Eli Lilly
and Company and Warburg, Pincus Investors, L.P., dated as
of September 15, 1992(4).
10.9 -- Supplement to Stock Purchase Agreement among the
Registrant, Eli Lilly and Company, Warburg, Pincus
Investors, L.P. and certain additional investors, dated
as of September 30, 1992(4).
10.10 -- Second Supplement to Stock Purchase Agreement among the
Company, Accel III, L.P., Accel Japan L.P., Accel
Investors '92 L.P., New Enterprise Associates V Limited
Partnership, Ven Sed I, Eli Lilly and Company and
Warburg, Pincus Investors, L.P., dated as of December 4,
1992(4).
10.11 -- Securities Purchase Agreement among Warburg, Pincus
Capital Partners, L.P., Humana Inc. and Vestar, Inc.,
dated May 11, 1990(5).
</TABLE>
45
<PAGE> 47
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.12 -- Collaborative Research Agreement between the Registrant
and Schering A.G., dated as of November 16, 1993(4).
10.13 -- Letter Agreement between the Registrant and Schering
A.G., effective February 1, 1997, amending the
Collaborative Research Agreement between the Registrant
and Schering A.G., dated as of November 16, 1993(5).
10.14 -- License Agreement between the Registrant and Schering
A.G., dated as of November 16, 1993(4).
10.15 -- Master Equipment Lease Agreement between Phoenix Leasing
Incorporated and the Registrant, dated November 15,
1993(4).
10.16 -- Master Lease Agreement between USL Capital Corporation
and the Registrant, dated as of November 9, 1995(6).
10.17 -- Master Lease Agreement, dated as of September 9, 1996,
between General Electric Capital Corporation and the
Registrant(3).
10.18 -- Master Security Agreement, dated as of March 27, 1997,
between General Electric Capital Corporation and the
Registrant(3).
10.19 -- Letter Agreement, dated January 24, 1994, between Eli
Lilly and Company and the Registrant(4).
10.20 -- Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Warburg, Pincus
Investors L.P., dated March 27, 1997(7).
10.21 -- NeXagen, Inc. 1993 Incentive Stock Plan, adopted February
8, 1993, as amended(3).
10.22 -- Registrant's 1995 Director Option Plan, adopted July 25,
1995(8).
10.23 -- Vestar, Inc. 1988 Stock Option Plan(2).
10.24 -- Registrant's 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, adopted
June 9, 1994(2).
10.25 -- Amendment No. 1 to Registrant's 1994 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, adopted June 9, 1994(1).
10.26 -- Lease, dated March 26, 1987, between Vestar, Inc. and
Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc. and
Amendment No. 1 thereto and Amendment No. 2 thereto,
dated as of June 8, 1992(2).
10.27 -- Third Amendment, dated January 11, 1996, between Majestic
Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc. and the
Registrant, to Lease, dated March 26, 1987, between
Vestar, Inc. and Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician
Associates, Inc.(6).
10.28 -- Assignment and Royalty Agreement, dated December 21,
1990, effective as of June 2, 1989, between Vestar, Inc.
and City of Hope National Medical Center(9).
10.29 -- License Agreement, effective as of August 12, 1986,
between Vestar, Inc. and The Regents of the University of
California(6).
10.30 -- Agreement by and between Fujisawa USA, Inc. and Vestar,
Inc., dated August 9, 1991, and Amendment No 1 thereto,
dated as of May 17, 1994(2).
10.31 -- Amendment No 2 to agreement between Fujisawa USA, Inc.
and Vestar, Inc., dated as of April 3, 1995, between
Fujisawa USA, Inc. and Vestar, Inc.(10) [Part of this
document has been redacted for purposes of
confidentiality pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended].
10.32 -- Amendment No. 3 to Agreement between Fujisawa USA, Inc.
and the Registrant, dated March 4, 1996, to the Agreement
by and between Fujisawa USA, Inc. and Vestar, Inc., dated
August 9, 1991(6).
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE> 48
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.33 -- Lease, dated April 13, 1992, between Vestar, Inc. and
Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc.(2).
10.34 -- First Amendment to Lease, dated April 10, 1993, between
Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc. and
Vestar, Inc. amending Lease, dated April 13, 1992,
between Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates,
Inc. and Vestar, Inc.(6).
10.35 -- Master Lease Agreement, dated June 29, 1994, between
Vestar, Inc. and Comdisco, Inc.(2).
10.36 -- Amendment No. 1, dated December 5, 1997, between the
Registrant and Comdisco, Inc. to the Master Lease
Agreement, dated June 29, 1994, between Vestar, Inc. and
Comdisco, Inc.
10.37 -- Lease Agreement, dated September 28, 1994, between the
Registrant and Deane Investment Co., Ltd.(2).
10.38 -- First Amendment to Lease, dated December 15, 1997,
between Deane Investment Co., Ltd. and the Registrant to
Lease Agreement, dated September 28, 1994, between the
Registrant and Deane Investment Co., Ltd.
10.39 -- License Agreement, dated December 23, 1992, between
Supragen, Inc. and National Jewish Center for Immunology
and Respiratory Medicine, as amended(8).
10.40 -- Employment Agreement, dated March 14, 1997, between the
Registrant and Nicole Onetto(7).
10.41 -- Consulting Agreement, dated January 29, 1998, between the
Registrant and Judith A. Hemberger.
10.42 -- Royalty Agreement, dated October 30, 1995, between the
Registrant and Amplimed Corporation(6).
10.43 -- Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement between the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs and the Registrant, dated April 30,
1996(11).
10.44 -- Master Agreement between Secretary of Veterans Affairs
and the Registrant, dated April 30, 1996(11).
10.45 -- Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement between the Secretary of
Health and Human Services and the Registrant, dated April
30, 1996(11).
10.46 -- Rebate Agreement between the Secretary of Health and
Human Services and the Registrant, dated April 30,
1996(11).
10.47 -- Industrial Real Estate Lease, dated July 1, 1996, by and
between Wilderness Place, Ltd. and the Registrant(12).
10.48 -- Sublease Agreement, dated July 31, 1996, between Sybase,
Inc. and the Registrant(13).
10.49 -- Lease Agreement, dated November 6, 1996, between Avalon
Investment Company and the Registrant(13).
10.50 -- Commercial Factoring Agreement between Santander de
Factoring, S.A. and NeXstar Farmaceutica, S.A., entered
into on May 21, 1996, as amended(5).
10.51 -- License and Distribution Agreement, dated September 26,
1997, by and between Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
and the Registrant(5). [Part of the document has been
redacted for purposes of confidentiality pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.]
</TABLE>
47
<PAGE> 49
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.52 -- Settlement Agreement, dated August 11, 1997, by and among
Registrant, Fujisawa U.S.A., Inc. and The Liposome
Company, Inc.(14). [Part of the document has been
redacted for purposes of confidentiality pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.]
10.53 -- Credit Agreement, dated September 1, 1997, by and between
the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association(14).
11.1 -- Statement Re: Computation of Net Loss Per Share.
21.1 -- Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 -- Consent of Independent Auditors.
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Previously filed in the Exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 333-04653), declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 19, 1996, which exhibit is incorporated by reference
herein.
(2) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-K (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated by
reference herein.
(3) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(4) Previously filed in the Exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 33-72142), declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 28, 1994, which exhibit is incorporated by reference
herein.
(5) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-K (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and incorporated by
reference herein.
(6) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-K (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated by
reference herein.
(7) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1997, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(8) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1995, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(9) Previously filed, on March 22, 1991, in the Exhibits to the Registration
Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33-39549), which exhibit is incorporated by
reference herein.
(10) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1995, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(11) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1996, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(12) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(13) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(14) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 31,
1997.
48
<PAGE> 50
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
By: /s/ PATRICK J. MAHAFFY
----------------------------------
Patrick J. Mahaffy
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Date: March 26, 1998
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ LAWRENCE M. GOLD Chairman of the Board and Chief March 26, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- Scientific Officer
Lawrence M. Gold
/s/ PATRICK J. MAHAFFY Director, President and Chief March 26, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- Executive Officer (Principal
Patrick J. Mahaffy Executive Officer)
/s/ JOHN D. BALDESCHWIELER Director March 26, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
John D. Baldeschwieler
/s/ JUDITH A. HEMBERGER Director March 26, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Judith A. Hemberger
/s/ DAVID I. HIRSH Director March 26, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
David I. Hirsh
/s/ ROGER G. KENNEDY Director March 26, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Roger G. Kennedy
/s/ RODMAN W. MOORHEAD, III Director March 26, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Rodman W. Moorhead, III
/s/ MICHAEL E. HART Vice President and Chief Financial March 26, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- Officer (Principal Financial
Michael E. Hart Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
</TABLE>
49
<PAGE> 51
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 27, 1998
F-1
<PAGE> 52
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1997 1996
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 39,292,000 $ 21,542,000
Marketable securities..................................... 24,997,000 20,423,000
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,150,000 and $1,025,000 at December 31,
1997 and 1996, respectively............................ 34,623,000 30,001,000
Inventories............................................... 14,606,000 15,629,000
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 3,872,000 2,276,000
------------- -------------
Total current assets........................................ 117,390,000 89,871,000
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization............................. 44,778,000 43,960,000
Investment in life science enterprise....................... -- 2,709,000
Patent and trademark costs, net of accumulated amortization
of $1,432,000 and $880,000 at December 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.............................................. 5,623,000 4,633,000
Purchased technology, net of accumulated amortization of
$2,490,000 at December 31, 1996........................... -- 2,010,000
Other noncurrent assets, net of allowance of $1,737,000 at
December 31, 1997 and 1996................................ 2,752,000 1,317,000
------------- -------------
Total assets................................................ $ 170,543,000 $ 144,500,000
============= =============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings..................................... $ 5,034,000 $ 12,936,000
Accounts payable.......................................... 5,237,000 10,483,000
Accrued compensation and employee benefits................ 4,338,000 3,544,000
Accrued litigation settlement and related expenses due
within one year........................................ 1,273,000 1,010,000
Accrued interest payable.................................. 2,083,000 --
Other accrued expenses.................................... 4,037,000 6,164,000
Long-term obligations due within one year................. 5,445,000 7,535,000
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities................................... 27,447,000 41,672,000
Accrued litigation settlement expenses due after one year... 8,767,000 --
Long-term obligations due after one year.................... 8,327,000 15,206,000
Convertible subordinated debentures......................... 80,000,000 --
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding shares -- 27,426,395
in 1997 and 26,410,811 in 1996......................... 274,000 264,000
Additional paid-in capital................................ 216,159,000 213,931,000
Deferred compensation..................................... (151,000) (367,000)
Cumulative translation adjustment......................... (394,000) (230,000)
Accumulated deficit....................................... (169,886,000) (125,976,000)
------------- -------------
Total stockholders' equity.................................. 46,002,000 87,622,000
------------- -------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................. $ 170,543,000 $ 144,500,000
============= =============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
<PAGE> 53
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Product revenues............................... $ 89,152,000 $ 80,153,000 $ 57,770,000
License fees................................... 10,000 7,000,000 --
Royalties...................................... 671,000 -- --
Collaborative agreements and contracts......... 2,388,000 1,548,000 2,920,000
Interest income................................ 2,446,000 1,821,000 1,736,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenues................................... 94,667,000 90,522,000 62,426,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Expenses:
Cost of goods sold............................. 19,787,000 18,320,000 13,246,000
Research and development....................... 53,015,000 47,760,000 37,356,000
Selling, general and administrative............ 45,033,000 42,933,000 35,300,000
Litigation settlement and related expenses..... 16,031,000 2,006,000 --
Purchased research and development............. -- -- 11,824,000
Interest expense............................... 4,389,000 1,558,000 1,148,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total expenses................................... 138,255,000 112,577,000 98,874,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss before provision for income taxes........... (43,588,000) (22,055,000) (36,448,000)
Provision for income taxes....................... 322,000 926,000 183,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss......................................... $(43,910,000) $(22,981,000) $(36,631,000)
============ ============ ============
Net loss per share............................... $ (1.65) $ (0.88) $ (1.57)
============ ============ ============
Shares used in computing net loss per share...... 26,692,000 26,029,000 23,374,000
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE> 54
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL CUMULATIVE TOTAL
--------------------- PAID-IN DEFERRED TRANSLATION ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT DEFICIT EQUITY
---------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31,
1994........................ 22,927,609 $229,000 $163,966,000 $(353,000) $(104,000) $ (66,364,000) $ 97,374,000
Issuance of common stock for
cash...................... 309,861 3,000 5,093,000 -- -- -- 5,096,000
Retirement agreement
transfer.................. -- -- 1,688,000 -- -- -- 1,688,000
Issuance of common stock for
purchase of Supragen,
Inc....................... 751,597 8,000 12,018,000 -- -- -- 12,026,000
Stock repurchases........... (1,156) -- -- -- -- -- --
Employee stock purchase
plan...................... 46,600 1,000 306,000 -- -- -- 307,000
Option exercises............ 198,328 2,000 553,000 -- -- -- 555,000
Warrant exercises........... 144,353 1,000 666,000 -- -- -- 667,000
Amortization of deferred
compensation.............. -- -- -- 118,000 -- -- 118,000
Foreign currency translation
adjustment................ -- -- -- -- (36,000) -- (36,000)
Net loss.................... -- -- -- -- -- (36,631,000) (36,631,000)
---------- -------- ------------ --------- --------- ------------- ------------
Balance at December 31,
1995........................ 24,377,192 244,000 184,290,000 (235,000) (140,000) (102,995,000) 81,164,000
Issuance of common stock for
cash...................... 1,429,268 14,000 24,982,000 -- -- -- 24,996,000
Stock repurchases........... (136) -- -- -- -- -- --
Employee stock purchase
plan...................... 58,357 1,000 807,000 -- -- -- 808,000
Option exercises............ 289,030 3,000 2,320,000 -- -- -- 2,323,000
Warrant exercises........... 257,100 2,000 1,231,000 -- -- -- 1,233,000
Deferred compensation
related to grants of stock
options................... -- -- 301,000 (301,000) -- -- --
Amortization of deferred
compensation.............. -- -- -- 169,000 -- -- 169,000
Foreign currency translation
adjustment................ -- -- -- -- (90,000) -- (90,000)
Net loss.................... -- -- -- -- -- (22,981,000) (22,981,000)
---------- -------- ------------ --------- --------- ------------- ------------
Balance at December 31,
1996........................ 26,410,811 264,000 213,931,000 (367,000) (230,000) (125,976,000) 87,622,000
Issuance of warrant to
related party............. -- -- 353,000 -- -- -- 353,000
Stock repurchases........... (408) -- -- -- -- -- --
Employee stock purchase
plan...................... 81,962 1,000 880,000 -- -- -- 881,000
Option exercises............ 161,160 1,000 932,000 -- -- -- 933,000
Warrant exercises........... 772,870 8,000 19,000 -- -- -- 27,000
Deferred compensation
related to grants of stock
options................... -- -- 44,000 (44,000) -- -- --
Amortization of deferred
compensation.............. -- -- -- 260,000 -- -- 260,000
Foreign currency translation
adjustment................ -- -- -- -- (164,000) -- (164,000)
Net loss.................... -- -- -- -- -- (43,910,000) (43,910,000)
---------- -------- ------------ --------- --------- ------------- ------------
Balance at December 31,
1997........................ 27,426,395 $274,000 $216,159,000 $(151,000) $(394,000) $(169,886,000) $ 46,002,000
========== ======== ============ ========= ========= ============= ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE> 55
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss.................................................... $(43,910,000) $(22,981,000) $(36,631,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and
equipment............................................... 9,535,000 9,759,000 8,490,000
Amortization of intangible assets......................... 3,199,000 1,541,000 1,301,000
Compensation expense related to grant of options and sales
of stock, including amortization of deferred
compensation............................................ 260,000 169,000 118,000
Write down of investment in life science enterprise....... -- 1,241,000 --
Purchased research and development........................ -- -- 11,824,000
Allowance for loan loss................................... -- -- 2,430,000
Other..................................................... (202,000) 222,000 487,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable..................................... (4,906,000) (11,499,000) (4,361,000)
Inventories............................................. 1,023,000 (6,160,000) (3,571,000)
Prepaid expenses and other.............................. (1,196,000) (328,000) 1,082,000
Other noncurrent assets................................. (25,000) 151,000 (141,000)
Accounts payable........................................ (5,115,000) 4,174,000 2,527,000
Accrued compensation and employee benefits.............. 794,000 735,000 846,000
Accrued retirement agreement............................ -- -- (2,150,000)
Accrued interest........................................ 2,083,000 -- --
Accrued litigation settlement and related expenses...... 9,030,000 -- --
Other accrued expenses.................................. (1,779,000) 2,645,000 671,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in operating activities....................... (31,209,000) (20,331,000) (17,078,000)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Maturities (purchases) of marketable securities, net........ (4,574,000) (14,582,000) 26,838,000
Additions to property, plant and equipment.................. (10,484,000) (11,198,000) (8,663,000)
Cash acquired from purchase of Supragen, Inc................ -- -- 418,000
Deletions to deposits....................................... -- -- 5,606,000
Proceeds from sale of investment in life science
enterprise................................................ 2,683,000 -- --
Additions to patent costs................................... (1,542,000) (1,320,000) (702,000)
Deletions to other noncurrent assets........................ 706,000 700,000 --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities......... (13,211,000) (26,400,000) 23,497,000
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from (payments on) short-term borrowings, net...... (7,902,000) 9,436,000 550,000
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions................... 2,217,000 2,978,000 2,363,000
Payments on capital lease obligations....................... (4,660,000) (4,258,000) (3,592,000)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt.................... 18,108,000 11,527,000 1,019,000
Repayments on long-term debt................................ (24,634,000) (1,667,000) --
Proceeds from issuance of convertible subordinated
debentures, net of offering costs......................... 77,200,000 -- --
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of offering costs... 1,841,000 29,364,000 6,529,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities................... 62,170,000 47,380,000 6,869,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents................... 17,750,000 649,000 13,288,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period............ 21,542,000 20,893,000 7,605,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.................. $ 39,292,000 $ 21,542,000 $ 20,893,000
============ ============ ============
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid............................................. $ 2,306,000 $ 1,558,000 $ 1,148,000
Income taxes paid......................................... 253,000 1,030,000 235,000
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements through
accounts payable........................................ 889,000 1,020,000 1,500,000
Issuance of stock through director deferred compensation
plan.................................................... -- 32,000 96,000
Accrued retirement agreement.............................. -- -- 1,688,000
DETAILS OF SUPRAGEN, INC. ACQUISITION:
Fair value of assets acquired............................. $ -- $ -- $ 1,248,000
Purchased research and development........................ -- -- 11,824,000
Liabilities assumed....................................... -- -- (1,046,000)
Stock issued.............................................. -- -- (12,026,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash paid................................................. -- -- --
Add: cash acquired........................................ -- -- 418,000
------------ ------------ ------------
$ -- $ -- $ 418,000
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE> 56
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1997
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals" or the "Company"), is an integrated biopharmaceutical company
engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary
pharmaceutical products to treat life-threatening and other serious oncological,
hematological and infectious diseases. NeXstar Pharmaceuticals was formed in
1991 as NeXagen, Inc. On February 21, 1995, the Company was merged (the
"Merger") with Vestar, Inc. ("Vestar"), a Delaware corporation founded in 1981,
and changed its name to NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Prior to the Merger,
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals was primarily engaged in the discovery and development
of novel oligonucleotide-based pharmaceuticals. As a result of the Merger, the
Company combined its drug discovery program and financial resources with
Vestar's proprietary drug delivery technology, existing products and product
pipeline and Vestar's manufacturing, marketing and regulatory capabilities. The
Merger was accounted for as a pooling of interests.
On September 8, 1995, the Company acquired all of the equity interests of
Supragen, Inc. ("Supragen"), a research-oriented biotechnology company, for $12
million in the form of 751,597 shares of the Company's common stock. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. As a result of the Supragen
acquisition, the Company recorded a one-time, non-cash charge of purchased
research and development in its 1995 results of operations of $11.8 million.
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations give
effect to the Supragen acquisition as though it had occurred at the beginning of
the period presented:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1995
------------
<S> <C>
Total revenues.............................................. $ 62,484,000
Net loss.................................................... (39,832,000)
Net loss per share.......................................... (1.67)
</TABLE>
The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative either of
results of operations that would have occurred had the purchase been made on
January 1, 1995 or future results of operations of the Company.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries; significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have
been made to prior year amounts to agree with the current year presentation.
Accounting Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
It is possible that the future economic life of the Company's technologies,
the amount of anticipated future commercial revenues, or both, could be reduced
significantly in the future due to alternate products or
F-6
<PAGE> 57
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
technologies being developed by other biotech or pharmaceutical companies. As a
result, the carrying amount of patent and trademark costs and purchased
technology costs could be reduced in the future.
Reporting Comprehensive Income
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("Statement No. 130").
Statement No. 130 establishes standards for reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. Statement
No. 130 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997.
Reclassification of financial statements for earlier periods provided for
comparative purposes is required. Adoption of Statement No. 130 in 1998 will
have no impact on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations or
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
In June 1997, the FASB issued Statement No. 131, "Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" ("Statement No. 131").
Statement No. 131 establishes standards for the way that public business
enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial
statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about
operating segments in interim financial reports. It also establishes standards
for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major
customers. Statement No. 131 is effective for financial statements for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 1997 and, therefore, the Company will adopt
the new requirements retroactively in 1998. Management has not completed its
review of Statement No. 131; however, the adoption of the statement could result
in the reporting of additional segment information and related disclosures.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are provided by the
straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful
life, which is as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Building........................................ 20 years
Laboratory and manufacturing equipment.......... 5-7 years
Office furniture and equipment.................. 3-7 years
Capitalized lease equipment..................... 3-5 years
Leasehold improvements.......................... Shorter of useful life or lease term
</TABLE>
Patent Costs
Effective January 1, 1996, the Company began amortizing its patent costs
over a period of ten years. Prior to January 1, 1996, patent costs were deferred
pending the outcome of patent applications. Successful patent costs were
amortized by the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful
life or the patent life. Unsuccessful patent costs were expensed when so
determined. This change did not have a significant impact on the Company's
financial condition or results of operations.
Product Revenues/Accounts Receivable
Product revenues are recognized upon passage of legal title of the
inventory.
A substantial majority of the Company's product revenues are export sales
of AmBisome primarily through Company subsidiaries and to distributors in
Europe. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition and generally has not required collateral. The Company's accounts
receivable
F-7
<PAGE> 58
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
are predominantly trade receivables, and to date, the Company has experienced
only modest losses with respect to the collection of its accounts receivable.
During 1997 and 1996, the Company increased its allowance for doubtful accounts
by $125,000 and $520,000, respectively, due to an increase in accounts
receivable resulting primarily from increased sales of the Company's products.
At December 31, 1997, the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts was
$1,150,000.
In 1997, 1996 and 1995, sales to one distributor accounted for
approximately 16%, 18% and 27% of product revenues, respectively.
In connection with most of its European sales, the Company prices its
products in the currencies of the country into which they are sold (the "Payment
Currencies"), and revenues in the past have been and in the future could be
adversely affected by currency fluctuations. A significant majority of the
Company's manufacturing costs are in U.S. Dollars. Therefore, any decline in the
value of the Payment Currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar is likely to
negatively impact gross margins for the Company's products since the Company's
manufacturing costs would stay approximately the same while its revenue in terms
of U.S. Dollars would decline.
Foreign Currency Transactions and Contracts
Foreign exchange transaction gains (losses) included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations in 1997, 1996 and 1995 were $(287,000), $(362,000) and
$371,000, respectively.
The Company hedges certain of its foreign currency exposures, with respect
to its outstanding trade accounts receivable and accounts payable, through the
use of forward contracts. The Company does not currently enter into speculative
foreign currency transactions and does not write speculative options. In the
future, the Company may begin currency hedging in connection with anticipated
revenues and expenses and may use options in addition to forward contracts. Such
hedging will be done solely for the purpose of protecting the Company from
foreign currency fluctuations. The Company recognizes a gain or loss for each
forward contract for the difference between the contract rate and the market
rate on each balance sheet date which is recorded as a selling, general and
administrative expense. At present, no deferred accounting is used in connection
with the Company's hedging activities. Notwithstanding its hedging activities
(which have not always included fully hedging against potential gains or
losses), the Company has in the past recognized foreign exchange gains and
losses. There can be no assurance that significant gains or losses will not be
incurred in the future.
At December 31, 1997 and 1996, the Company had forward exchange contracts
outstanding of $27.9 million and $17.9 million, respectively. These contracts
have maturities that do not exceed one year and gains/losses resulting from
these contracts were not material.
The Company does not hedge any balance sheet exposure of its foreign
subsidiaries.
Research and Development
Expenditures for research and development, including costs related to
contract and collaborative agreements, and technology defense costs are charged
to operations as incurred.
Net Loss per Share
Effective December 31, 1997, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 128,
"Earnings Per Share" ("Statement No. 128"), which replaced the calculation of
primary and fully diluted earnings per share with basic and diluted earnings per
share. Unlike primary earnings per share, basic earnings per share excludes any
dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted
earnings per share is very similar to the
F-8
<PAGE> 59
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
previous fully diluted earnings per share. Earnings per share amounts for all
periods presented conform to Statement No. 128.
The Company's basic and diluted net loss per share is computed using the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Common equivalent
shares from stock options, warrants and convertible securities are excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect is antidilutive.
The impact of Statement No. 128 on the calculation of net loss per share for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 was not material.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents represent highly liquid debt instruments with a
maturity of three months or less when purchased.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FASB Statement No. 107, "Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments," requires disclosures of fair value information about financial
instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The Company's
financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents,
marketable securities, accounts receivable, forward contracts, short-term
borrowings, accounts payable, long-term obligations and convertible subordinated
debentures. The Company believes the financial instruments' recorded values
approximate current values with the exception of the convertible subordinated
debentures. The fair value of the convertible subordinated debentures at
December 31, 1997 was $74.4 million (such fair value being determined by the
average of the bid and asked price set by a market marker for the convertible
subordinated debentures) as compared to a carrying value of $80 million.
NOTE 2. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at
the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet
date. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, adjusted for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such
amortization is included in interest income. Realized gains and losses and
declines in value judged to be other than temporary are included in income. At
December 31, 1997 and 1996, aggregate amortized cost of marketable securities
approximates their aggregate fair value (based on dealer quotations).
The following is a summary of the amortized cost of available-for-sale
marketable securities, which approximates estimated fair value:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1997 1996
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Corporate securities....................................... $14,821,000 $ 9,421,000
U.S. government agency securities.......................... 8,001,000 7,007,000
U.S. government securities................................. 175,000 1,995,000
Other debt securities...................................... 2,000,000 2,000,000
----------- -----------
Total marketable securities................................ $24,997,000 $20,423,000
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The following is a summary of the amortized cost, which approximates
estimated fair value of marketable securities available for sale, by contractual
maturity:
F-9
<PAGE> 60
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1997 1996
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Due in one year or less.................................... $24,997,000 $13,517,000
Due after one year through three years..................... -- 6,906,000
----------- -----------
Total marketable securities................................ $24,997,000 $20,423,000
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
NOTE 3. INVENTORIES
Raw materials, work in process and finished goods inventories are recorded
at the lower of cost or market, based on currently adjusted standard costs,
which approximates cost on a first-in, first-out basis.
Inventories are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Finished goods............................................ $ 3,512,000 $ 4,092,000
Work in process........................................... 8,161,000 8,358,000
Raw materials............................................. 2,933,000 3,179,000
----------- -----------
Total inventories......................................... $14,606,000 $15,629,000
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
NOTE 4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1997 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Building................................................ $ 1,831,000 $ --
Laboratory and manufacturing equipment.................. 18,038,000 13,060,000
Office furniture and equipment.......................... 9,238,000 8,991,000
Capitalized leased equipment............................ 20,086,000 21,027,000
Leasehold improvements.................................. 30,519,000 27,335,000
Construction-in-progress................................ 763,000 524,000
------------ ------------
80,475,000 70,937,000
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization.......... (35,697,000) (26,977,000)
------------ ------------
Net equipment and leasehold improvements................ $ 44,778,000 $ 43,960,000
============ ============
</TABLE>
NOTE 5. INVESTMENT IN LIFE SCIENCE ENTERPRISE
At December 31, 1996, the Company recorded a $1,241,000 write down to an
investment in a life science enterprise accounted for under the cost method due
to a permanent decline in value. In June 1997, the Company sold all of its
holdings in the enterprise for $2.7 million following that company's initial
public offering. As a result of the sale, the Company recorded a loss of $26,000
in 1997.
NOTE 6. PURCHASED TECHNOLOGY
In 1992, the Company and Vical, Incorporated ("Vical") entered into an
agreement under which the Company purchased (for $3,000,000) exclusive rights to
develop applications of Vical's lipid conjugate technology for a limited number
of applications. This agreement was expanded in 1993 (for an additional
$1,500,000) to grant the Company exclusive rights to Vical's entire portfolio of
lipid conjugate technologies for all potential therapeutic applications. The
cost of such base-core technology was capitalized and is
F-10
<PAGE> 61
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
included in purchased technology on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of December 31, 1996. Prior to January 1, 1995, the Company amortized the
technology over the estimated life of the related patents. Effective January 1,
1995, the Company began amortizing the remaining value of the technology over a
four-year period. The Company evaluated the carrying amount of the technology
for impairment at least quarterly by, among other things, reviewing the status
of applicable ongoing development activities, as well as the progress of patent
applications and issuances. In September 1997, the Company determined that it
would no longer pursue this technology and expensed the remaining $1.3 million
of unamortized purchased technology.
NOTE 7. OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES
Other accrued expenses consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1997 1996
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Commissions, distribution fees and royalties................ $ 860,000 $2,346,000
Other....................................................... 3,177,000 3,818,000
---------- ----------
Total other accrued expenses................................ $4,037,000 $6,164,000
========== ==========
</TABLE>
NOTE 8. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
Long-term obligations consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Term loan: interest payable monthly at LIBOR or floating
prime rate of bank (7.125% at December 31, 1996)........ $ -- $ 8,750,000
Capital lease obligations: interest payable monthly at
6.89% to 12.43%......................................... 9,419,000 11,861,000
Other debt: monthly installments through 2002; secured by
equipment; interest payable monthly at 9.69% to
12.62%.................................................. 4,353,000 2,130,000
----------- -----------
Total long-term obligations............................... 13,772,000 22,741,000
Less current portion...................................... (5,445,000) (7,535,000)
----------- -----------
Long-term obligations due after one year.................. $ 8,327,000 $15,206,000
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Maturities of all long-term obligations, including capital lease
obligations, due subsequent to December 31, 1997 are as follows:
$5,445,000 -- 1998; $4,768,000 -- 1999; $1,832,000 -- 2000; $1,342,000 -- 2001;
and $385,000 -- 2002.
In June 1996, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with a bank
for $10 million (the "Loan Agreement"). The Loan Agreement was repaid in the
third quarter of 1997.
NOTE 9. CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
During the third quarter of 1997, the Company sold $80 million of 6 1/4%
Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2004 (the "Debentures") in a private
offering to SBC Warburg Inc. and Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. which resold the
Debentures to a group of private investors. The Debentures were issued pursuant
to an indenture and are convertible into a total of up to 4,740,740 shares of
the Company's common stock at $16.875 per share. The Company has reserved
4,740,740 shares of its authorized common stock for shares which may be issued
upon conversion of the Debentures. As required by the terms of a registration
rights agreement (the
F-11
<PAGE> 62
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
"Registration Rights Agreement") entered into by the Company in connection with
the sale of the Debentures, the Company filed a "shelf" registration statement
registering for resale the Debentures and the shares of common stock into which
the Debentures may be converted. The registration statement was declared
effective on October 6, 1997. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the
Company is required to keep the "resale" registration statement effective for up
to two years.
NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases and Financing Agreements
The Company has entered into three long-term noncancelable operating leases
and one long-term noncancelable operating sublease for office, research and
manufacturing facilities in Boulder, Colorado and two long-term lease agreements
for office, research and manufacturing facilities in San Dimas, California. The
five leases and one sublease contain the following terms:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOCATION TERMINATION DATE RENEWAL OPTIONS
- -------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Boulder, CO...................................... October 2001 2 5-year terms
Boulder, CO...................................... November 2001 1 3-year term
Boulder, CO...................................... January 2002 2 7-year terms
Boulder, CO...................................... July 2003 N/A
San Dimas, CA.................................... November 2003 2 5-year terms
San Dimas, CA.................................... May 2003 2 5-year terms
</TABLE>
The Company has entered into certain sale-leaseback transactions and
related master equipment lease agreements for manufacturing equipment, general
laboratory and scientific equipment, office equipment, furniture and fixtures.
Title to assets acquired under the lease lines of credit resides with the
lessor. The Company has the option to purchase the assets at the end of the
lease term at fair market value. The leases have terms ranging from three to
five years.
The Company has entered into certain financing transactions and related
capital equipment and facilities improvement master agreements for manufacturing
equipment, general laboratory and scientific equipment, office equipment,
furniture, fixtures and facilities improvements. At December 31, 1997,
$5,387,000 was available under such agreements.
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 was
approximately $4,538,000, $3,485,000 and $2,618,000, respectively.
F-12
<PAGE> 63
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating and capital
leases with initial or remaining terms of more than one year as of December 31,
1997 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDING OPERATING CAPITAL
DECEMBER 31, LEASES LEASES
------------ ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
1998.................................................... $ 4,055,000 $ 4,770,000
1999.................................................... 3,276,000 3,308,000
2000.................................................... 2,896,000 1,138,000
2001.................................................... 2,252,000 1,005,000
2002.................................................... 1,799,000 184,000
Thereafter.............................................. 1,733,000 --
----------- -----------
$16,011,000 10,405,000
===========
Less amount representing interest....................... (986,000)
-----------
Total capital lease obligations......................... 9,419,000
Less current portion.................................... (4,098,000)
-----------
Capital lease obligations due after one year............ $ 5,321,000
===========
</TABLE>
Loan Receivable
The Company owns a 13.9% equity interest in Phytogen Life Sciences Inc.
("PLS"), a Canadian corporation incorporated in British Columbia. In June 1996,
the Company's holdings in connection with PLS were restructured. Pursuant to the
restructuring, the Company gave up its right to convert a Canadian $4,500,000
loan (the "Loan")(approximately $3,285,000 at the time of conversion and
approximately $3,348,000 at December 31, 1995), which it made to PLS, into a
49.9% interest in PLS; converted Canadian $968,784 (approximately $707,000 at
the time of conversion) of the Loan into 235,714 preference shares in PLS; and
converted the Loan to a United States Dollar-based loan. In addition, PLS issued
a warrant to the Company to acquire up to 300,000 PLS common shares for $3 per
share and repaid the Company approximately $700,000 in connection with the Loan.
During 1997, PLS repaid the Company $753,000 in connection with the Loan. The
face amount of the Loan at December 31, 1997 was $1,737,000 with an outstanding
allowance for loan loss of $1,737,000. On December 31, 1995, the Company
recorded an allowance for loan loss of $2,430,000 for the Loan and ceased
accruing interest.
Short-Term Borrowings
In March 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with a domestic bank
pursuant to which the Company and certain of its subsidiaries could borrow up to
$15 million, with the borrowings being collateralized by certain of the non-U.S.
accounts receivable of the Company and the subsidiaries. In September 1997, the
Company simultaneously terminated this agreement and entered into an unsecured
line of credit with the same bank for $10 million (the "Credit Agreement"). The
Credit Agreement terminates on September 1, 1998. The short-term borrowings
outstanding at December 31, 1997 include borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
In May 1996, the Company's Spanish subsidiary entered into an agreement to
borrow up to 500 million Spanish Pesetas (approximately $3.3 million on December
31, 1997) with such borrowing being secured by the subsidiary's accounts
receivable in Spain. In February 1997, the agreement was amended to increase the
amount that the subsidiary may borrow to 750 million Spanish Pesetas
(approximately $4.9 million on December 31, 1997). In connection with the
agreement, the Company is maintaining $2.0 million in an unrestricted account.
As of December 31, 1997, the subsidiary had borrowings of 500 million Spanish
Pesetas (approximately $3.3 million on December 31, 1997) under the agreement.
The Company's Spanish subsidiary has notified the lender that it intends to
terminate the agreement in April 1998.
F-13
<PAGE> 64
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The weighted average interest rates on short-term borrowings as of December
31, 1997 and 1996 were 6.89% and 8.13%, respectively.
Licenses and Royalties
The Company has entered into license agreements with various commercial,
medical and educational institutions to obtain certain exclusive and
nonexclusive patent rights for the purpose of developing, manufacturing and
selling potential products using these patented technologies. Under these
agreements, the Company will pay royalties at varying rates based upon levels of
revenues from the licensed products, as defined. Generally, the agreements
continue as long as any licensed patents remain in force.
In September 1996, the Company and Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
("Sumitomo") entered into an agreement (the "Sumitomo License") pursuant to
which Sumitomo will develop and market AmBisome in Japan. Under the terms of the
Sumitomo License, Sumitomo paid the Company an initial $7 million licensing fee
(less withholding taxes of $700,000) in October 1996. Sumitomo also is required
to make additional payments to the Company if certain clinical and commercial
milestones are met and to pay the Company royalties on all Japanese sales.
Patent Matters
On August 11, 1997, the Company and The Liposome Company, Inc. ("TLC")
reached a settlement in which the two companies agreed to dismiss all legal
proceedings involving TLC's reexamined U.S. Patent No. 4,880,635 (the "TLC '635
Patent") and U.S. Patent No. 5,578,320 (the "TLC '320 Patent") and their
international counterparts. The legal proceedings related to whether AmBisome,
the Company's liposomal formulation of amphotericin B, infringed TLC's patents
because of the manner in which it is freeze dried (lyophilized). In the
settlement agreement between the parties (the "Settlement Agreement"), TLC
granted the Company immunity from suit in connection with the worldwide
production and sales of AmBisome and a worldwide right to use the TLC '635
Patent and the TLC '320 Patent. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the
Company made an initial payment to TLC of $1.75 million and is required to make
future payments beginning in 1998 based on AmBisome sales over the next several
years. Because the payments are subject to certain minimum and maximum payments,
the Company recorded accounting charges in 1997 of $11.8 million, of which $10.0
million represented the net present value of all future minimum payments it is
required to make and $1.75 million represented the cash payment in the third
quarter of 1997. The Company does not expect the difference between its future
minimum and maximum payments to TLC to be material.
Legal Proceedings Generally
The Company is involved, from time to time, in legal proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, after
consultation with legal counsel, none of these matters, based on factors
currently known to management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on
the financial position of the Company.
NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock
On February 13, 1996, the Company completed a private sale of 1,425,000
shares of its common stock to a group of private investors (the "Private
Investors"). The net proceeds to the Company from the sale were approximately
$24.9 million. In connection with the transaction, the Company filed a "shelf"
registration statement on Form S-3 registering for resale the shares acquired by
the Private Investors. Pursuant to its agreement with the Private Investors, the
Company is required to keep the "resale" registration statement effective for up
to three years. In addition to the Private Investors, a holder of 297,619 shares
of the
F-14
<PAGE> 65
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Company's common stock and two holders of warrants to acquire 250,481 shares of
the Company's common stock exercised registration rights granted to them by the
Company and had their shares of common stock, or the shares of common stock
which relate to their warrants, included in the registration statement.
On December 22, 1995, the Company sold 297,619 shares of its common stock
in a private offering for $5 million ($16.80 per share).
Warrants
Common stock warrant activity was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RANGE OF SHARES EXPIRATION
WARRANTS EXERCISE PRICES RESERVED DATE
---------- --------------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, December 31,
1996....................... 1,218,373 $4.09 - $32.54 1,218,373 1997 - 2003
Granted.................... 125,000 $12.50 125,000 2000
Exercised.................. (1,079,168) $4.83 - $11.21 (1,079,168) 1997 - 1998
Expired.................... (7,920) $11.65 (7,920) 1997
---------- ----------
Outstanding, December 31,
1997....................... 256,285 $4.09 - $32.54 256,285 2000 - 2003
========== ==========
</TABLE>
In 1990, the Company issued to Warburg, Pincus Capital Partners, L.P.
("WPCP"), which at that time was a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
Company's common stock, a warrant to purchase 220,000 shares of common stock
with a purchase price of $4.09 per share in connection with the issuance of a
letter of credit on behalf of the Company, which has expired. In April 1995, the
warrant was exercised for 40,000 shares of common stock and the warrant expired
for the remaining 180,000 shares of common stock. In addition, WPCP had a
warrant to purchase 1,035,294 shares of the Company's common stock at an
exercise price of $4.83 per share, which was issued in 1990 in connection with
the sale of certain equity securities of the Company. In April 1995, WPCP's
warrant was amended to change the expiration date to December 31, 1997. On
September 30, 1997, WPCP exercised its warrant for 1,035,294 shares in a net
exercise and received 753,577 shares of the Company's common stock.
In March 1997, Warburg, Pincus Investors, L.P. ("WPI"), which is an owner
of more than 5% of the Company's common stock, received a warrant to acquire
125,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a purchase price of $12.50 per
share in return for an affiliate of WPI guaranteeing a credit line entered into
by the Company (the "Credit Line"). Under the Credit Line, which was terminated
in July 1997, the Company was permitted to borrow up to $15 million.
Registration Rights
Under certain circumstances, the Company's common stockholders and holders
of warrants to purchase common stock of the Company may require a registration
of the outstanding common shares or the shares underlying warrants, the cost of
which would be borne by the Company.
Stock Options and Stock-Based Compensation
On February 8, 1993, the Company adopted the 1993 Incentive Stock Plan (the
"1993 Plan") for employees, directors, and consultants of NeXstar
Pharmaceuticals which provides for the sale of shares or the issuance of
incentive and nonstatutory stock options for common stock. Options issued under
the 1993 Plan are exercisable under conditions as determined by the Board of
Directors, with the term of each option being a maximum of ten years from the
date of grant. On May 28, 1997, the number of shares which can be granted under
the 1993 Plan was increased 1,500,000 shares to 3,904,847 shares. The Company
has reserved 3,904,847 shares of its authorized common stock under the 1993
Plan. Options granted prior to November 1993 vest 20%
F-15
<PAGE> 66
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
immediately and 20% on the grant date anniversary each year thereafter for four
years. Options granted after October 1993 generally vest 25% on each anniversary
date of the four years following the grant date.
The Company has reserved for issuance 1,204,904 shares of its common stock
to allow for the exercise of options under its 1988 Stock Option Plan (the "1988
Plan"). Options granted under the 1988 Plan are exercisable upon conditions
determined by the Board of Directors of the Company, and expire no later than
ten years from the date of grant. The Company does not intend, and after April
27, 1998 is not permitted, to issue additional options under the 1988 Plan.
On July 25, 1995, the Company adopted the 1995 Director Option Plan (the
"Director Plan"). Under the Director Plan, each outside director of the Company
is entitled to receive an option for 10,000 shares of the Company's common stock
on the later of the effective date of the Director Plan or the date on which
such person first becomes an outside director. In addition, each outside
director who has served on the Board of Directors for at least six months
automatically is entitled to receive an option grant for 5,000 shares on the
last business day prior to each annual meeting of stockholders of the Company.
The options have a term of ten years, an exercise price equal to 100% of the
fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and vest 50% on each
anniversary date of the two years following the grant date. Options for up to
500,000 shares of common stock may be issued under the Director Plan. In 1997,
options for 40,000 shares were issued to six outside directors. In 1996, options
for 15,000 shares were issued to three outside directors.
Stock option activity was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
RANGE OF EXERCISE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICES PRICE
--------- --------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, December 31, 1994................ 1,950,772 $ 0.69 - $18.47 $ 7.29
Granted..................................... 783,640 $ 5.65 - $16.50 $13.79
Exercised................................... (249,980) $ 0.69 - $13.92 $ 3.92
Forfeited................................... (294,098) $ 0.69 - $15.91 $ 8.74
---------
Outstanding, December 31, 1995................ 2,190,334 $ 0.69 - $18.47 $ 9.80
Granted..................................... 654,300 $15.00 - $25.00 $19.20
Exercised................................... (290,615) $ 0.69 - $18.47 $ 8.08
Forfeited................................... (130,385) $ 1.12 - $25.00 $17.91
---------
Outstanding, December 31, 1996................ 2,423,634 $ 0.69 - $25.00 $12.11
Granted..................................... 899,110 $10.31 - $18.25 $13.11
Exercised................................... (163,971) $ 0.69 - $16.48 $ 5.94
Forfeited................................... (175,973) $ 1.12 - $25.00 $15.26
---------
Outstanding, December 31, 1997................ 2,982,800 $ 0.69 - $25.00 $12.56
=========
Exercisable, December 31, 1995................ 997,798 $ 7.89
Exercisable, December 31, 1996................ 1,090,662 $ 8.75
Exercisable, December 31, 1997................ 1,364,481 $10.44
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
during 1995................................. $ 6.53
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
during 1996................................. $ 10.38
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
during 1997................................. $ 5.60
</TABLE>
F-16
<PAGE> 67
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The options outstanding at December 31, 1997 have been segregated into
ranges for additional disclosure as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
----------------------------------------- OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
WEIGHTED -------------------------
OPTIONS AVERAGE WEIGHTED OPTIONS WEIGHTED
OUTSTANDING AT REMAINING AVERAGE EXERCISABLE AT AVERAGE
RANGE OF DECEMBER 31, CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE DECEMBER 31, EXERCISE
EXERCISE PRICES 1997 LIFE IN YEARS PRICE 1997 PRICE
--------------- -------------- ------------- -------- -------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0.69 - $ 7.96............... 480,881 3.14 $ 4.18 416,210 $ 3.94
$ 8.38 - $14.75............... 1,675,679 5.85 $12.46 740,067 $11.99
$14.77 - $23.00............... 727,240 5.68 $16.74 174,704 $16.65
$23.75 - $25.00............... 99,000 6.60 $24.31 33,500 $24.33
--------- ---------
$ 0.69 - $25.00............... 2,982,800 5.40 $12.56 1,364,481 $10.44
========= =========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1997, options for 1,824,846 shares were available for
future grants under the 1993 Plan and the Director Plan.
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25"), in accounting for
its employee stock options because, as discussed below, the alternative fair
value accounting provided for under FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation" ("Statement No. 123"), requires use of option
valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock
options. Because the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options
equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no
compensation expense is recognized under APB No. 25.
Statement No. 123 requires disclosure of pro forma net income and pro forma
earnings per share. It also requires that the pro forma information be
determined as if the Company has accounted for its employee stock options
granted subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of Statement
No. 123. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively: risk-free interest rates of
5.59%, 5.49% and 5.51%; a dividend yield of 0%; volatility factors of the
expected market price of the Company's common stock of .5178, .7240 and .6206;
and an average expected life of the options after vesting date of 1.00, 1.23 and
0.90 years.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price
volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting periods. The Company's
pro forma information follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pro forma net loss....................... $(47,900,000) $(26,080,000) $(37,269,000)
Pro forma net loss per share............. $ (1.79) $ (1.00) $ (1.59)
</TABLE>
Because Statement No. 123 is applicable only to options granted subsequent
to December 31, 1994, its pro forma effect will not be fully reflected until the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.
F-17
<PAGE> 68
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
As a result of nonstatutory stock options granted to consultants in 1997
and 1996, the Company recorded deferred compensation of $44,000 and $301,000,
respectively, which is being amortized over a period of four years. The Company
recognized $142,000 and $51,000 as a non-cash charge to earnings during 1997 and
1996, respectively, as a result of this amortization.
As a result of compensatory stock issuances and option grants in 1993, the
Company recorded deferred compensation of $470,000 which it amortized over a
period of four years.
Restrictions on Payment of Dividends
Certain of the Company's bank and building improvement and equipment lease
facilities require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and levels
of cash and/or stockholders' equity which may have the effect of limiting the
Company's ability to pay dividends.
NOTE 12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On June 9, 1994, the Company adopted an employee stock purchase plan (the
"Stock Purchase Plan") with an effective date of August 1, 1994, under Internal
Revenue Code Section 423, which provides for the sale to employees of up to
500,000 shares of common stock. The Company has reserved 500,000 shares of its
authorized common stock in connection with the Stock Purchase Plan. Employees
who work at least twenty hours per week and at least five months per calendar
year may participate. The granting of rights (options) to purchase common stock
of the Company is determined by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 1997,
a total of 192,928 shares have been purchased at prices per share from $4.78 to
$15.30, which represented 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on
the lower of the offering date or the date of exercise. Expenses associated with
the Stock Purchase Plan are not material.
Stock Purchase Plan activity was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
RANGE OF EXERCISE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICES PRICE
-------- --------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, December 31, 1994................ -- -- --
Granted..................................... 46,600 $ 4.78 - $ 7.23 $ 6.60
Exercised................................... (46,600) $ 4.78 - $ 7.23 $ 6.60
Outstanding, December 31, 1995................ -- -- --
Granted..................................... 58,357 $12.75 - $15.30 $13.85
Exercised................................... (58,357) $12.75 - $15.30 $13.85
Outstanding, December 31, 1996................ -- -- --
Granted..................................... 81,962 $ 9.67 - $12.11 $10.75
Exercised................................... (81,962) $ 9.67 - $12.11 $10.75
--------
Outstanding, December 31, 1997................ -- -- --
========
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
during 1995................................. $ 2.36
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
during 1996................................. $ 6.76
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
during 1997................................. $ 4.60
</TABLE>
F-18
<PAGE> 69
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Retirement Savings Plan
The Company maintains a retirement savings plan pursuant to which eligible
employees may defer compensation for income tax purposes under Section 401(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Savings Plan"). Employee contributions
are discretionary, but are not to exceed 15% of eligible annual compensation.
The Savings Plan includes a Company match of 50% of employee contributions up to
a maximum of 6% of eligible annual compensation. For the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, the Company recorded expenses related to the Savings
Plan of approximately $580,000, $513,000 and $160,000, respectively. At December
31, 1997, approximately $1.0 million representing 87,885 shares of the Company's
common stock, was held by the Savings Plan in trust for plan participants.
Additional contributions of Company stock are not allowed under the Savings
Plan.
NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES
For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes includes the
following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pretax loss:
United States......................... $(40,801,000) $(20,890,000) $(35,128,000)
Foreign............................... (2,787,000) (1,165,000) (1,320,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
$(43,588,000) $(22,055,000) $(36,448,000)
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The current provision for income and withholding taxes includes the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal income taxes........................ $ -- $ -- $ --
State income taxes.......................... -- -- --
Foreign income taxes........................ 305,000 226,000 183,000
Foreign withholding taxes................... 17,000 700,000 --
------------ ----------- ------------
$ 322,000 $ 926,000 $ 183,000
============ =========== ============
</TABLE>
The difference between the Company's current provision for income taxes and
the federal statutory rate of 34% is reconciled as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Statutory rate applied to income before
income taxes.............................. $(14,820,000) $(7,499,000) $(12,392,000)
Tax effect of foreign subsidiary losses..... 1,114,000 553,000 457,000
Difference in foreign income tax rates...... 87,000 49,000 (23,000)
In-process purchased research and
development............................... -- -- 4,030,000
Merger-related costs not deductible for tax
purposes.................................. -- -- 790,000
Net operating loss unused/(net of operating
loss carryforwards utilized).............. 13,691,000 6,958,000 7,996,000
Foreign withholding taxes................... 17,000 700,000 --
Other....................................... 233,000 165,000 (675,000)
------------ ----------- ------------
$ 322,000 $ 926,000 $ 183,000
============ =========== ============
</TABLE>
F-19
<PAGE> 70
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
At December 31, 1997, the Company had net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income. Utilization of these
losses and credits may be subject to substantial annual limitations due to the
separate return limitation years and ownership change limitations provided by
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The annual limitation may result in the
expiration of the net operating losses and credits before utilization. Tax loss
and tax credit carryforwards are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FEDERAL STATE
---------------------------- ---------------------------
RESEARCH AND
NET RESEARCH AND NET DEVELOPMENT
OPERATING DEVELOPMENT OPERATING AND OTHER
EXPIRES DECEMBER 31, LOSS CREDITS LOSS CREDITS
-------------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999.......................... $ 126,000 $ -- $ -- $ --
2000.......................... 1,825,000 -- -- --
2001.......................... 3,809,000 -- -- --
2002.......................... 3,732,000 -- 3,636,000 --
2003.......................... 6,442,000 -- 3,153,000 --
2004.......................... 7,287,000 -- 3,646,000 --
2005.......................... 6,815,000 -- 3,717,000 --
2006.......................... 2,943,000 -- 2,943,000 --
2007.......................... 8,002,000 463,000 8,002,000 --
2008.......................... 14,857,000 4,669,000 12,403,000 1,397,000
2009.......................... 5,284,000 710,000 5,391,000 6,000
2010.......................... 15,803,000 517,000 6,564,000 371,000
2011.......................... 15,669,000 691,000 10,702,000 500,000
2012.......................... 33,045,000 2,408,000 23,338,000 300,000
------------ ---------- ----------- ----------
$125,639,000 $9,458,000 $83,495,000 $2,574,000
============ ========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>
The components of the Company's deferred tax asset and related valuation
allowance as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1997 1996
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net operating loss carryforwards
Federal............................................... $ 42,717,000 $ 31,482,000
State................................................. 4,175,000 3,008,000
Tax credit carryforwards
Federal............................................... 9,458,000 7,050,000
State................................................. 2,574,000 2,274,000
Other -- net............................................ 8,649,000 7,266,000
------------ ------------
67,573,000 51,080,000
Valuation allowance..................................... (67,573,000) (51,080,000)
------------ ------------
Deferred tax asset recognized........................... $ -- $ --
============ ============
</TABLE>
F-20
<PAGE> 71
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
3.1 -- Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Registrant(1).
3.2 -- Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant(2).
4.1 -- Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to this Report).
4.2 -- Form of Common Stock certificate of the Registrant(2).
4.3 -- Indenture, dated as of July 31, 1997, between the
Registrant and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company as
Trustee, for the Registrant's 6 1/4% Convertible
Subordinated Debentures due 2004(3).
4.4 -- Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 31, 1997, among
the Registrant and SBC Warburg Inc. and Oppenheimer &
Co., Inc.(3).
10.1 -- License Agreement between University Research Corporation
and the Registrant, effective as of July 17, 1991, as
amended on October 26, 1992(4).
10.2 -- Amendment No. 2, effective April 5, 1996, and Amendment
No. 3, dated September 5, 1996, to the License Agreement
between University Research Corporation and the
Registrant, effective as of July 17, 1991, as amended on
October 26, 1992(5).
10.3 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among the Registrant, Warburg,
Pincus Investors, L.P., University Research Corporation
and Lawrence M. Gold, dated as of July 17, 1991, as
amended on December 4, 1992, and as amended by letter
agreement on November 19, 1993(4).
10.4 -- Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 1991, between the
Registrant and Lawrence M. Gold(4).
10.5 -- Letter Agreement, dated May 1, 1992, between the
Registrant and Patrick J. Mahaffy(4).
10.6 -- Master Equipment Lease Agreement between MMC/GATX
Partnership No. 1 and the Registrant, dated as of
November 23, 1992(4).
10.7 -- Research and License Agreement between Eli Lilly and
Company and the Registrant, effective as of September 15,
1992, and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of April 1,
1994(2).
10.8 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among the Registrant, Eli Lilly
and Company and Warburg, Pincus Investors, L.P., dated as
of September 15, 1992(4).
10.9 -- Supplement to Stock Purchase Agreement among the
Registrant, Eli Lilly and Company, Warburg, Pincus
Investors, L.P. and certain additional investors, dated
as of September 30, 1992(4).
10.10 -- Second Supplement to Stock Purchase Agreement among the
Company, Accel III, L.P., Accel Japan L.P., Accel
Investors '92 L.P., New Enterprise Associates V Limited
Partnership, Ven Sed I, Eli Lilly and Company and
Warburg, Pincus Investors, L.P., dated as of December 4,
1992(4).
10.11 -- Securities Purchase Agreement among Warburg, Pincus
Capital Partners, L.P., Humana Inc. and Vestar, Inc.,
dated May 11, 1990(5).
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 72
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.12 -- Collaborative Research Agreement between the Registrant
and Schering A.G., dated as of November 16, 1993(4).
10.13 -- Letter Agreement between the Registrant and Schering
A.G., effective February 1, 1997, amending the
Collaborative Research Agreement between the Registrant
and Schering A.G., dated as of November 16, 1993(5).
10.14 -- License Agreement between the Registrant and Schering
A.G., dated as of November 16, 1993(4).
10.15 -- Master Equipment Lease Agreement between Phoenix Leasing
Incorporated and the Registrant, dated November 15,
1993(4).
10.16 -- Master Lease Agreement between USL Capital Corporation
and the Registrant, dated as of November 9, 1995(6).
10.17 -- Master Lease Agreement, dated as of September 9, 1996,
between General Electric Capital Corporation and the
Registrant(3).
10.18 -- Master Security Agreement, dated as of March 27, 1997,
between General Electric Capital Corporation and the
Registrant(3).
10.19 -- Letter Agreement, dated January 24, 1994, between Eli
Lilly and Company and the Registrant(4).
10.20 -- Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Warburg, Pincus
Investors L.P., dated March 27, 1997(7).
10.21 -- NeXagen, Inc. 1993 Incentive Stock Plan, adopted February
8, 1993, as amended(3).
10.22 -- Registrant's 1995 Director Option Plan, adopted July 25,
1995(8).
10.23 -- Vestar, Inc. 1988 Stock Option Plan(2).
10.24 -- Registrant's 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, adopted
June 9, 1994(2).
10.25 -- Amendment No. 1 to Registrant's 1994 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, adopted June 9, 1994(1).
10.26 -- Lease, dated March 26, 1987, between Vestar, Inc. and
Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc. and
Amendment No. 1 thereto and Amendment No. 2 thereto,
dated as of June 8, 1992(2).
10.27 -- Third Amendment, dated January 11, 1996, between Majestic
Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc. and the
Registrant, to Lease, dated March 26, 1987, between
Vestar, Inc. and Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician
Associates, Inc.(6).
10.28 -- Assignment and Royalty Agreement, dated December 21,
1990, effective as of June 2, 1989, between Vestar, Inc.
and City of Hope National Medical Center(9).
10.29 -- License Agreement, effective as of August 12, 1986,
between Vestar, Inc. and The Regents of the University of
California(6).
10.30 -- Agreement by and between Fujisawa USA, Inc. and Vestar,
Inc., dated August 9, 1991, and Amendment No 1 thereto,
dated as of May 17, 1994(2).
10.31 -- Amendment No 2 to agreement between Fujisawa USA, Inc.
and Vestar, Inc., dated as of April 3, 1995, between
Fujisawa USA, Inc. and Vestar, Inc.(10) [Part of this
document has been redacted for purposes of
confidentiality pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended].
10.32 -- Amendment No. 3 to Agreement between Fujisawa USA, Inc.
and the Registrant, dated March 4, 1996, to the Agreement
by and between Fujisawa USA, Inc. and Vestar, Inc., dated
August 9, 1991(6).
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 73
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.33 -- Lease, dated April 13, 1992, between Vestar, Inc. and
Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc.(2).
10.34 -- First Amendment to Lease, dated April 10, 1993, between
Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates, Inc. and
Vestar, Inc. amending Lease, dated April 13, 1992,
between Majestic Realty Co. and Patrician Associates,
Inc. and Vestar, Inc.(6).
10.35 -- Master Lease Agreement, dated June 29, 1994, between
Vestar, Inc. and Comdisco, Inc.(2).
10.36 -- Amendment No. 1, dated December 5, 1997, between the
Registrant and Comdisco, Inc. to the Master Lease
Agreement, dated June 29, 1994, between Vestar, Inc. and
Comdisco, Inc.
10.37 -- Lease Agreement, dated September 28, 1994, between the
Registrant and Deane Investment Co., Ltd.(2).
10.38 -- First Amendment to Lease, dated December 15, 1997,
between Deane Investment Co., Ltd. and the Registrant to
Lease Agreement, dated September 28, 1994, between the
Registrant and Deane Investment Co., Ltd.
10.39 -- License Agreement, dated December 23, 1992, between
Supragen, Inc. and National Jewish Center for Immunology
and Respiratory Medicine, as amended(8).
10.40 -- Employment Agreement, dated March 14, 1997, between the
Registrant and Nicole Onetto(7).
10.41 -- Consulting Agreement, dated January 29, 1998, between the
Registrant and Judith A. Hemberger.
10.42 -- Royalty Agreement, dated October 30, 1995, between the
Registrant and Amplimed Corporation(6).
10.43 -- Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement between the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs and the Registrant, dated April 30,
1996(11).
10.44 -- Master Agreement between Secretary of Veterans Affairs
and the Registrant, dated April 30, 1996(11).
10.45 -- Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement between the Secretary of
Health and Human Services and the Registrant, dated April
30, 1996(11).
10.46 -- Rebate Agreement between the Secretary of Health and
Human Services and the Registrant, dated April 30,
1996(11).
10.47 -- Industrial Real Estate Lease, dated July 1, 1996, by and
between Wilderness Place, Ltd. and the Registrant(12).
10.48 -- Sublease Agreement, dated July 31, 1996, between Sybase,
Inc. and the Registrant(13).
10.49 -- Lease Agreement, dated November 6, 1996, between Avalon
Investment Company and the Registrant(13).
10.50 -- Commercial Factoring Agreement between Santander de
Factoring, S.A. and NeXstar Farmaceutica, S.A., entered
into on May 21, 1996, as amended(5).
10.51 -- License and Distribution Agreement, dated September 26,
1997, by and between Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
and the Registrant(5). [Part of the document has been
redacted for purposes of confidentiality pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.]
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 74
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.52 -- Settlement Agreement, dated August 11, 1997, by and among
Registrant, Fujisawa U.S.A., Inc. and The Liposome
Company, Inc.(14). [Part of the document has been
redacted for purposes of confidentiality pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.]
10.53 -- Credit Agreement, dated September 1, 1997, by and between
the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association(14).
11.1 -- Statement Re: Computation of Net Loss Per Share.
21.1 -- Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 -- Consent of Independent Auditors.
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Previously filed in the Exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 333-04653), declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 19, 1996, which exhibit is incorporated by reference
herein.
(2) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-K (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated by
reference herein.
(3) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(4) Previously filed in the Exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 33-72142), declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 28, 1994, which exhibit is incorporated by reference
herein.
(5) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-K (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and incorporated by
reference herein.
(6) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-K (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, and incorporated by
reference herein.
(7) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1997, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(8) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1995, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(9) Previously filed, on March 22, 1991, in the Exhibits to the Registration
Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33-39549), which exhibit is incorporated by
reference herein.
(10) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1995, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(11) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1996, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(12) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996, and incorporated
by reference herein.
(13) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996, and
incorporated by reference herein.
(14) Previously filed in the Exhibits to Form 10-Q (File No. 0-23012) for the
Registrant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997, and
incorporated by reference herein.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.36
[COMDISCO, INC. LETTERHEAD]
December 5, 1997
Ms. Lauri R. Harker
Treasurer
Nexstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2860 Wilderness Place
Boulder, CO 80301
RE: Equipment subject to Equipment Schedule No. 17SL24604-Eg-01 (the
"Equipment") to the Master Lease Agreement dated as of June 29, 1994 between
Vestar Incorporated ("Lessee") and Comdisco, Inc. ("Lessor")(the "Lease").
Dear: Ms. Harker:
Comdisco is pleased to offer the following proposal for mid-term extension of
the above referenced Lease:
OPTION #1
PROPOSED TERMS: Extend the Lease for the Equipment effective January 1, 1998.
The new monthly payment is $139,895.00 to be paid in advance for 45 months. At
end of lease extension, equipment will have a fair market value cap not to
exceed 20% of original equipment cost.
OPTION #2
PROPOSED TERMS: Extend the Lease for the Equipment effective January 1, 1998.
The new monthly payment is $122,189.00 to be paid in advance for 57 months. At
end of lease extension, equipment will have a fair market value cap not to
exceed 10.5% of original equipment cost.
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: Various Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Equipment
This proposal is subject to: i) Lessee being current on any and all amounts
payable under the Lease through December 31, 1997; ii) Lessee being liable for
any and all taxes applicable to the proposed transaction; and iii) all other
terms and conditions of the Lease to remain the same.
<PAGE> 2
Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing below and returning
this document to my attention on or before December 19, 1997.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
COMDISCO, INC. ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
/s/ ALAN LUSTIGSON Option # 2
Alan Lustigson By: /s/ MICHAEL E. HART
Portfolio Manager -----------------------------
Title: VP and CFO
--------------------------
cc: A. Mitzen Date: 12/5/97
---------------------------
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.38
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This First Amendment to that certain Lease is made and entered into as of the
15th day of December, 1997, dated September 28, 1994 by and between
Deane Investment Co., Ltd. ("Landlord") and NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
formerly Nexagen, Inc. ("Tenant") ("The Lease") for Suite 502 in that certain
office building, commonly know as One Twin Lakes Business Park, Boulder,
Colorado 80301.
1. EXPANSION SUITE AND TERM. Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant approximately
5,260 square feet of additional space, commonly known as Suite 501
("Expansion Suite"). The term for the Expansion Suite shall extend from
12:00 noon on the 15th day of December, 1997 or upon the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy, which ever is later ("Term Commencement Date")
until 12:00 noon on the 15th day of December, 2000, or to such date that
is the same amount of days the Term Commencement Date is extended beyond
December 15, 1997 unless terminated sooner as provided in the Lease.
2. RENT. Tenant agrees to pay to Landlord as rent for the Expansion Suite the
sum of One Hundred Twenty Four Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Two and 00/100's
Dollars ($124,662.00), payable in beginning monthly installments of Three
Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Two and 83/100's dollars ($3,462.83). The
rental amount is based upon a rate of $7.90 per square foot. Tenant shall
pay for utility expenses for the suite, but otherwise the rent provided
herein shall be gross rental. Rent shall be pro rated for any partial
month.
3. OCCUPANCY. Should the Term Commencement Date extend beyond December 15,
1997 Tenant may occupy 2,000 square feet of the Expansion Suite for
warehouse purposes only beginning on December 15, 1997 for an additional
One thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per month until the Term Commencement
Date but in no event later than March 15, 1998.
4. ESCALATION. Rent shall increase four percent (4%) commencing the
thirteenth (13th) month of the term and annually thereafter. Article 4 of
the Lease shall not be applicable to the Expansion Suite.
5. RENEWAL OPTION. Tenant shall have one, three-year option to renew the
lease for the Expansion Suite at the then current rental rate continuing
to escalate four percent (4%) per annum.
6. SECURITY DEPOSIT. An amount equal to one month's rent ($3,462.83) shall be
deposited with the Landlord at the signing of this document by Tenant to
be held as additional security deposit.
7. TENANT IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE. Landlord shall pay to Tenant an amount equal
to $2.50 per square foot, or Thirteen Thousand One Hundred Fifty Dollars
($13,150.00), towards the Landlord approved improvements to the Expansion
Suite. Any additional cost for Tenant Improvement in excess of Thirteen
Thousand One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($13,150.00) shall be paid at Tenant's
sole cost and expense.
9. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS.
(A) Upon execution of this lease Tenant shall prepay rent for one month
in the amount of ($3,462.83).
(B) Tenant shall obtain Landlord's approval of all plans and
specifications for any improvements prior to commencement of
construction. Tenant shall also protect Landlord from construction
liens as a result of improvements to the Expansion Suite. Tenant
anticipates utilizing approximately 2,000 to 3,000 square feet as
warehouse with shelving separated from the rest of the space with
chain link fence, approximately 1000 square feet used as office,
document control and conference space, utilizing drywall partitions
and the remaining
<PAGE> 2
1,000 to 2,000 square feet as controlled storage
utilizing chain link fence partitions and potentially
one or two UL rated safety storage units.
(C) Tenant shall obtain all necessary permits and
approvals and comply with all applicable laws and
regulations as they relate to improvements to the
Expansion Suite.
(D) Tenant shall be permitted, at its expense, to
construct a fire door through the fire wall in order
to permit access between 501 and 502 and to run
telephone and data cable through the fire wall. At the
conclusion of the term, Landlord may require Tenant to
remove any such fire door constructed and repair the
fire wall at Tenant's expense.
(E) Landlord shall reimburse Tenant fifty percent (50%) of
any expense to increase the water tap size to the
building as required by the City of Boulder to comply
with its building code. This will also include
increasing the size of the interior water line if it
is required by the City of Boulder.
(F) Landlord, at Landlord's expense, shall repair the
overhead door, water damage on the walls and HVAC unit
on the roof.
Except as hereby expressly amended, the terms and conditions of the Lease shall
remain in fully force and effect.
LANDLORD:
DEAN INVESTMENT CO. LTD.
By: /s/ RICHARD L. DEANE
------------------------------
Name: Richard L. Deane
Its: General Partner
TENANT:
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
By: /s/ MICHAEL E. HART
------------------------------
Name: Michael E. Hart
Its: VP/CFO
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.41
[NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. LETTERHEAD]
January 29, 1998
Dr. Judith A. Hemberger
3117 West 118th Street
Leawood, KS 66211
Re: Consulting Services
Dear Dr. Hemberger:
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("NeXstar") has requested that you act as a
consultant on its behalf and you have agreed to provide such consulting services
to NeXstar. Our understanding with regard to the consulting services to be
provided by you is as follows:
1. SERVICES. You agree, from time to time as requested by Patrick J.
Mahaffy, Lawrence M. Gold or Nicole Onetto, and as agreed to by you, to provide
consulting services (the "Consulting Services") which relate to your areas of
expertise, in particular, medical and regulatory affairs. You and NeXstar agree
that NeXstar is not required to use your services for any minimum number of
hours.
2. COMPENSATION. As compensation for the Consulting Services, NeXstar
agrees to pay you $1,500 per day; provided that, in the event that you work
fewer than six hours during any day, your compensation for that day shall be
$200 per hour actually worked. You will provide NeXstar with an invoice of the
hours which you worked for NeXstar on at least a monthly basis. NeXstar agrees
to pay you promptly following receipt of your invoice, but is not required to
pay you more than once during any calendar month.
3. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from January 29, 1998 until
terminated by either party hereto in writing.
4. TAXES. NeXstar will not make any withholdings of taxes from the
payments for Consulting Services under this Letter Agreement. As an independent
contractor, you are solely responsible for the payment of all applicable state
and federal taxes.
5. EXPENSES. NeXstar agrees to reimburse you for the out-of-pocket
expenses which you may incur in connection with providing the Consulting
Services.
6. CONFIDENTIALITY. You agree to keep confidential all
<PAGE> 2
proprietary information of NeXstar and its affiliates obtained by you while
providing the Consulting Services.
7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR RELATIONSHIP. It is our mutual intention
that you shall perform the Consulting Services solely in the capacity as an
independent contractor to NeXstar, and not as an employee of NeXstar or any of
its affiliates. You shall have no authority, express or implied, to make any
agreements, promises, commitments or representations on behalf of NeXstar or
any of its affiliates, and you agree you will not attempt to do so. You are
responsible for obtaining and maintaining all permits or licenses necessary for
the provision of the Consulting Services. It is understood, however, that the
provisions of this Section 7 shall have no effect on your rights and
obligations as a director of NeXstar. All materials prepared by you in
connection with the Consulting Services shall be the exclusive property of
NeXstar, and may be used by NeXstar at its sole discretion.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. As part of the consideration for the Consulting
Services, NeXstar agrees to indemnify and hold you harmless from and against
any loss, damage, expense or liability arising out of or in connection with
any action, suit, claim, demand or prosecution that may be brought against or
instituted against you based on or arising out of the Consulting Services;
provided, however, that NeXstar's obligation to indemnify or hold you harmless
shall not apply to any loss, damage, expense or liability directly caused by
your gross negligence or willful misconduct.
If the terms set forth above are in agreement with your understanding of
the terms pursuant to which you are to provide Consulting Services, please
execute this Letter Agreement in the manner provided below.
Very truly yours,
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
By: /s/ NICOLE ONETTO
----------------------
Dr. Nicole Onetto
V.P., Medical Affairs
Agreed To And
Accepted As Set
Forth Above
By: /s/ DR. JUDITH A. HEMBERGER
----------------------------
Dr. Judith A. Hemberger
S.S # ###-##-####
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 11.1
NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net loss ............................. $(43,910,000) $(22,981,000) $(36,631,000)
============ ============ ============
Applicable common shares:
Weighted average shares outstanding
during the period ................ 26,692,000 26,029,000 23,374,000
============ ============ ============
Net loss per common share ............ $ (1.65) $ (0.88) $ (1.57)
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals GmbH (Germany)
NeXstar Farmaceutica, S.A. (Spain)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Italia, Srl (Italy)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Limited (United Kingdom)
NeXstar Farmaceutica Portugal, LDA (Portugal)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals B.V. (The Netherlands)
NeXstar Pharmaceutique Sarl (France)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals PTY Limited (Australia)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Limited (Ireland)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals International Limited (United Kingdom)
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8, No. 33-80938, No. 33-97206 and No. 333-34515) pertaining to the
NeXagen, Inc. 1993 Incentive Stock Plan, the Registration Statements (Forms S-8,
No. 33-88074 and No. 333-07887) pertaining to the NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1994 Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-07889)
pertaining to the NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1995 Director Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-90994) pertaining to the Vestar, Inc.
1988 Stock Option Plan and the Vestar, Inc. 1992 Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors, the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-00758) of
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, and the
Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-35827) of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 27, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1997.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 25, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 39,292,000
<SECURITIES> 24,997,000
<RECEIVABLES> 35,773,000
<ALLOWANCES> 1,150,000
<INVENTORY> 14,606,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 117,390,000
<PP&E> 80,475,000
<DEPRECIATION> 35,697,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 170,543,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 27,447,000
<BONDS> 88,327,000
0
0
<COMMON> 274,000
<OTHER-SE> 45,728,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 170,543,000
<SALES> 89,152,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 94,667,000
<CGS> 19,787,000
<TOTAL-COSTS> 19,787,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 114,079,000
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 4,389,000
<INCOME-PRETAX> (43,588,000)
<INCOME-TAX> 322,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (43,910,000)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (43,910,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (1.65)
<EPS-DILUTED> (1.65)
</TABLE>
