SMITH CHARLES E RESIDENTIAL REALTY INC, S-3, 2000-01-18

SMITH CHARLES E RESIDENTIAL REALTY INC
S-3, 2000-01-18
REAL ESTATE

Previous: BIOTECHNOLOGY VALUE FUND L P, SC 13D/A, 2000-01-18

Next: SMITH CHARLES E RESIDENTIAL REALTY INC, 8-K/A, 2000-01-18

<PAGE>

AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JANUARY 18, 2000
Registration No. 333-______

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

------------------------

FORM S-3

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

------------------------

CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland 54-1681655
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

2345 Crystal Drive
Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia 22202
(703) 920-8500
(Address, including zip code and telephone number, including
area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)

------------------------

Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr.
President
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
2345 Crystal Drive
Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia 22202
(703) 920-8500
(Name and address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)

------------------------

Copies to:

J. Warren Gorrell, Jr., Esq.
Bruce W. Gilchrist, Esq.
Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004-1109
(202) 637-5600

------------------------

APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF THE PROPOSED SALE OF THE SECURITIES TO THE
PUBLIC: From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective,
as determined by market conditions.

If the only securities being registered on this Form are being offered pursuant
to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box. / /

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a
delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box. /X/

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant
to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list
the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. / /

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under
the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. / /

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. / /

------------------------

<PAGE>

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE (1)
- ------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- -------------------------
Proposed Maximum Proposed Maximum
Title of Shares Amount to be Aggregate Price Aggregate Amount of
to be Registered Registered Per Share (1) Offering Price (1) Registration Fee
- ------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock, $.01 par value
per share (2) 424,242 $ 34.844 $ 14,782,288.25 $ 3,902.52
- ------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- -------------------------

</TABLE>

(1) Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee in
accordance with Rule 457(c) based on the average of the high and low
reported sales prices on the New York Stock Exchange on January 14, 2000.

(2) Includes associated rights to purchase Series D Junior Participating
Preferred Stock.

------------------------

THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES
AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE
A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a),
MAY DETERMINE.

<PAGE>

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JANUARY 18, 2000

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
PROSPECTUS

CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY, INC.

424,242 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

This prospectus relates to 424,242 shares of common stock
that we may issue to the holders of 424,242 units of limited
partnership interest of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty
L.P., or "Smith L.P.," upon tender of these units for
redemption. These units were issued on January 13, 1999, in
exchange for a property known as Terrace Apartments located in
Elk Grove Village, Illinois and a property known as Park West
Apartments located in Chicago, Illinois.

We are registering the issuance of the common stock to
permit the holders to sell without restriction in the open
market or otherwise, but the registration of the common stock
does not necessarily mean that any holders will elect to
redeem their units. Also, we may elect to pay cash for the
units tendered rather than issue common stock. Although we
will incur expenses in connection with the registration of the
424,242 shares of common stock, we will not receive any cash
proceeds upon their issuance.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
under the trading symbol "SRW."

CONSIDER CAREFULLY THE RISK FACTORS BEGINNING ON PAGE 3 IN
THIS PROSPECTUS FOR FACTORS THAT ARE RELEVANT TO AN INVESTMENT
IN THE COMMON STOCK, INCLUDING SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THAT
APPLY TO REDEEMING UNITHOLDERS.

------------------------------

The information contained in this prospectus is not
complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities
until the registration statement relating to these securities
has been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. This prospectus is neither an offer to sell nor a
solicitation of an offer to buy these securities in any state
where the offer or sale is unlawful.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY
STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THESE
SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR
COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL
OFFENSE.

JANUARY __, 2000

<PAGE>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
----

<S> <C>
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY................................................................. 1
Forward-Looking Information.................................................... 1
The Company.................................................................... 1
Recent Developments............................................................ 2
Offered Shares ................................................................ 2
Important Risks in Owning Our Common Stock..................................... 2
Tax Status of the Company...................................................... 2
RISK FACTORS....................................................................... 3
A Unitholder Who Redeems Units for Common Stock May Have Adverse Tax Effects... 3
If a Unitholder Redeems Units, the Original Receipt of the Units May
Be Subject to Tax............................................................ 3
Differences Between an Investment in Shares of Common Stock and Units May
Affect Redeeming Unitholders................................................. 3
Some of Our Policies May Be Changed Without a Vote of Shareholders............. 3
Provisions of Our Charter Could Inhibit Changes of Control..................... 4
Our Ability to Issue Preferred Shares Could Inhibit Changes of Control......... 4
Maryland Law Limits Changes of Control......................................... 4
We Have Adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan Which Could Delay or Prevent
a Change of Control ......................................................... 4
We Have a Share Ownership Limit................................................ 5
The Large Number of Shares Available for Future Sale Could Adversely
Affect the Market Price of Our Common Stock.................................. 5
Changes in Market Conditions Could Adversely Affect the Market Price
of Our Common Stock.......................................................... 5
Our Earnings and Cash Distributions Will Affect the Market Price of
Our Common Stock............................................................. 5
Market Interest Rates and Low Trading Volume May Have an Effect on
the Value of Our Common Stock ............................................... 5
We Believe, but Cannot Guarantee, that We Qualify as a REIT.................... 6
Our Failure to Qualify as a REIT Would Have Serious Adverse Consequences....... 6
We May Need to Borrow Money to Qualify as a REIT............................... 6
We Are Subject To Some Taxes Even If We Qualify as a REIT...................... 6
Redeeming Unitholders Will Be Subject to the Operational Risks
of Our Business.............................................................. 7
REDEMPTION OF UNITS................................................................ 8
General........................................................................ 8
Tax Consequences of Redemption................................................. 8
Comparison of Ownership of Units and Common Stock.............................. 10
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS.................................................. 20
General........................................................................ 20
Our Tax Treatment.............................................................. 20
Requirements for Qualification As a REIT....................................... 21
Tax Aspects of Our Investments in Smith L.P. and Property
Service Businesses........................................................... 25
Taxation of Shareholders....................................................... 26
Other Tax Considerations....................................................... 31
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION............................................................... 32
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION................................................ 32
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE.................................... 32
EXPERTS............................................................................ 33
LEGAL MATTERS...................................................................... 34

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

THIS SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS INFORMATION CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROSPECTUS.
IT IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS IMPORTANT
TO YOU. TO UNDERSTAND THIS COMMON STOCK OFFERING, YOU SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE
PROSPECTUS CAREFULLY, INCLUDING THE RISK FACTORS AND FEDERAL INCOME TAX
CONSIDERATIONS.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

THIS PROSPECTUS INCLUDES FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WHICH INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. WHENEVER YOU SEE THE WORDS "BELIEVES," "ANTICIPATES," AND
"EXPECTS" AND SIMILAR WORDS INDICATING UNCERTAINTY, YOU SHOULD REMEMBER THAT THE
STATEMENTS ARE ASSUMPTIONS. THESE ASSUMPTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL FINANCIAL RESULTS OR MANAGEMENT PLANS AND
OBJECTIVES TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED OR EXPRESSED IN THIS
PROSPECTUS. FOR EXAMPLE, SUCH DIFFERENCES MAY OCCUR BECAUSE OF CHANGES IN:

- NATIONAL AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS (ESPECIALLY IN
MULTIFAMILY PROPERTY OCCUPANCIES AND RENTAL GROWTH IN THE
WASHINGTON, D.C. METROPOLITAN AREA);

- OUR ABILITY TO IDENTIFY AND SECURE ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES AND
PROPERTY LOCATIONS;

- THE EFFECT OF PREVAILING MARKET INTEREST RATES AND THE PRICING OF
OUR COMMON STOCK;

- THE ACCEPTANCE OF OUR FINANCING PLANS BY THE CAPITAL MARKETS; AND

- OTHER RISKS WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE DISCUSSED IN THIS
PROSPECTUS OR IN OUR OTHER FILINGS WITH THE SEC.

WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU CONSIDER CAREFULLY THE RISKS OF SUCH ASSUMPTIONS BEFORE
MAKING ANY INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK.

WE ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO PUBLICLY UPDATE OR REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS IN THIS PROSPECTUS, WHETHER AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE
EVENTS OR OTHERWISE.

THE COMPANY

As a self-managed equity REIT, we acquire, develop, manage and operate
multifamily properties primarily in the Washington, D.C., Chicago, Boston, and
Southeastern Florida metropolitan areas. We are a fully integrated real estate
organization with in-house acquisition, development, financing, marketing,
property management and leasing expertise. Our primary strategy for growth is to
acquire, develop, own and manage high quality multifamily properties to generate
long-term income and increases in value.

We are the sole general partner of Smith L.P. As of December 31, 1999, we
owned approximately 59.9% of its outstanding units. Smith L.P. and its
subsidiaries own all of our properties, property interests and business assets.

As of December 31, 1999, we owned all or a portion of 54 multifamily
apartment communities with a total of 24,948 units. 44 of the properties were
located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, two in the Boston
metropolitan area, six in the Chicago metropolitan area and two in the Southeast
Florida area. We currently have approximately 1,800 units under construction and
approximately 1,200 additional units under construction which are subject to
pre-purchase agreements. We also manage approximately 2,400 additional
apartment units for other property owners. Besides our residential properties,
we own two retail centers in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area with
approximately 436,000 square feet of retail space.

Our principal executive offices are located at 2345 Crystal Drive,
Arlington, Virginia 22202, and our telephone number is (703) 920-8500.

-1-
<PAGE>

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

We have recently acquired a 2,669-unit portfolio in Southeast Florida from
a partnership comprised of institutional investors. The portfolio includes eight
high-rise buildings located in the Hollywood/Aventura Beach area. Four of the
buildings are located on the oceanfront and the others located on the
intracoastal waterway. The total investment included approximately $178 million
payable to the seller of the buildings and an estimated $33 million in capital
improvements planned over the next two years. Closing on three of the buildings
occurred on December 21, 1999 and the remaining five buildings on January 13,
2000. The transaction was funded with proceeds from the disposition of four
multifamily properties (totaling approximately $71 million) and our bank credit
line.

OFFERED SHARES

This prospectus relates to 424,242 shares of common stock that we may
issue to the holders of 424,242 units of Smith L.P. upon tender of these
units for redemption. These units were issued on January 13, 1999, in
exchange for a property known as Terrace Apartments located in Elk Grove
Village, Illinois and a property known as Park West Apartments located in
Chicago, Illinois. For purposes of this prospectus, the term "unitholder"
refers to holders of units issued as described in the previous sentence.

On January 13, 2000 (or the date of this prospectus, if later), the
unitholders will become eligible to redeem their units for cash or, at our
election, shares of our common stock equal to the number of units being
redeemed.

IMPORTANT RISKS IN OWNING OUR COMMON STOCK

Before you decide to redeem your Units, you should read the "Risk Factors"
section, which begins on page 3 of this prospectus.

TAX STATUS OF THE COMPANY

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the
Internal Revenue Code. We believe that we qualify for taxation as a REIT and
generally will not be subject to federal income tax on net income that we
distribute to our shareholders. We currently are required, among other things,
to distribute at least 95% of our taxable income, excluding any net capital
gain. For our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, this requirement
will be relaxed but we still will be required to distribute 90% of this amount.
Even if we qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we are subject to certain federal,
state and local taxes on our income and property and to federal income and
excise tax on the income we do not distribute. In addition, the operating
companies in which we own 99% non-voting interests are subject to federal, state
and local income taxes. See "Federal Income Tax Considerations" for a more
detailed explanation.

-2-
<PAGE>

RISK FACTORS

IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS, YOU SHOULD
CONSIDER CAREFULLY THE FOLLOWING RISK FACTORS.

A UNITHOLDER WHO REDEEMS UNITS MAY HAVE ADVERSE TAX EFFECTS. A
unitholder who redeems units will be treated for tax purposes as having sold the
units. The sale will be taxable and the unitholder will be treated as realizing
an amount equal to the sum of the value of the common stock or cash that the
unitholder receives PLUS the amount of Smith L.P. nonrecourse liabilities
allocable to the redeemed units. It is possible that the amount of gain the
unitholder recognizes could exceed the value of the common stock or cash that
the unitholder receives. It is even possible that the tax liability resulting
from this gain could exceed the value of the common stock or cash that the
unitholder receives. See "Redemption of Units--Tax Consequences of Redemption."

In addition, the unitholder's ability to sell common stock received
upon redemption in order to raise cash to pay the resulting tax liability may be
restricted due to our common stock's relatively low trading volume. As a result
of fluctuations in the stock price, the price a unitholder receives for the
shares may not equal the value of the units redeemed. See "--Market Interest
Rates and Low Trading Volume May Have an Effect on the Value of Our Common
Stock."

IF A UNITHOLDER REDEEMS UNITS, THE ORIGINAL RECEIPT OF THE UNITS MAY BE
SUBJECT TO TAX. If a unitholder redeems units, particularly within two years of
receiving them, there is a risk that the original receipt of the units may be
treated as a taxable sale under the "disguised sale" rules of the Internal
Revenue Code. Subject to several exceptions, the tax law generally provides that
a partner's contribution of property to a partnership and a simultaneous or
subsequent transfer of money or other consideration from the partnership to the
partner will be presumed to be a taxable sale. In particular, if money or other
consideration is transferred by a partnership to a partner within two years of
the partner's contribution of property, the transactions are presumed to be a
taxable sale of the contributed property unless the facts and circumstances
clearly establish that the transfers are not a sale. On the other hand, if two
years have passed between the original contribution of property and the transfer
of money or other consideration, the transactions will not be presumed to be a
taxable sale unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish that they
should be.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AN INVESTMENT IN SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AND UNITS
MAY AFFECT REDEEMING UNITHOLDERS. If a unitholder elects to redeem units, we
will determine whether the unitholder receives cash or shares of our common
stock in exchange for the units. Although an investment in shares of our common
stock is substantially similar to an investment in units in Smith L.P., there
are some differences between ownership of units and ownership of common stock.
These differences include form of organization, management structure, voting
rights, liquidity and federal income taxation. These differences, some of which
may be material to investors, are discussed in "Redemption of Units --
Comparison of Ownership of Units and Common Stock."

SOME OF OUR POLICIES MAY BE CHANGED WITHOUT A VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS. Our
Board of Directors establishes many of our major policies, including those
relating to investment, financing, growth, acquisitions, development, debt
capitalization and distributions. Although the Board of Directors currently has
no intention to amend or revise these and other policies, it may do so from time
to time without a vote of our shareholders. In order to change our policy of
seeking to maintain our REIT qualification status, however, we must have the
approval of our shareholders. Changes in our policies may not fully serve the
interests of all shareholders.

3
<PAGE>

PROVISIONS OF OUR CHARTER COULD INHIBIT CHANGES OF CONTROL. There are
provisions of our charter that may delay or otherwise limit the ability of
outside parties to acquire control of us or engage in some other transaction.
These charter provisions include three-year staggered terms for directors, the
authority of the Board of Directors to classify capital stock into one or more
series having special preferences without shareholder approval, and a 9.8% share
ownership limit. See "-- We Have a Share Ownership Limit" below. These
limitations could prevent us from entering into a change of control transaction
or other transaction that could be in the best interests of our shareholders.

In addition, we cannot merge, consolidate or engage in any combination
with another person or sell all or substantially all of our assets unless the
transaction includes a merger of, or a sale of assets by, Smith L.P., which may
require approval of the holders of a majority of the units. We currently hold
approximately 59.9% of the common units in Smith L.P. This voting requirement
might limit the possibility for acquisition or change in control, even if a
change in control were in our shareholders' interest. In this regard, the
holders of units might incur different, and more adverse, tax consequences as a
result of an acquisition or change in control that could motivate them to oppose
a transaction that is in the shareholders' interest.

OUR ABILITY TO ISSUE PREFERRED SHARES COULD INHIBIT CHANGES OF CONTROL.
Our charter authorizes the Board of Directors to issue preferred shares and to
establish the preferences and rights of any preferred shares issued, including
the right to vote and the right to convert them into shares of common stock.
This power to issue preferred shares could have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change in control even if a change in control were in our
shareholders' interest. As of December 31, 1999, we had outstanding six series
of preferred shares. The preferred shares outstanding rank senior to the common
stock with respect to dividend rights and distributions upon liquidation,
dissolution and winding up. We are subject to the risks normally associated with
preferred equity financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be
insufficient to meet the required payments on the shares.

MARYLAND LAW LIMITS CHANGES OF CONTROL. Provisions of Maryland
corporate law prohibit "business combinations," including issuances of equity
securities, between a Maryland corporation and any person who owns 10% or more
of the voting power of the corporation's shares of capital stock, or an
"interested stockholder," unless the transaction is approved by 80% of the
corporation's outstanding voting shares. In addition, an interested stockholder
may not engage in a business combination for five years following the date he
became an interested stockholder. Except as described below, we are subject to
these provisions. As a result, a change in control or other transaction that may
provide our shareholders with a premium or which might otherwise be in their
best interests may be prevented or delayed.

Our charter, as is permitted by Maryland corporate law, exempts any
business combination involving Messrs. Smith and Kogod and persons affiliated or
acting in concert with them. Consequently, Messrs. Smith and Kogod and their
affiliates are permitted to enter into business combinations with us without the
supermajority shareholder approval otherwise required by Maryland law.

WE HAVE ADOPTED A SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN WHICH COULD DELAY OR PREVENT
A CHANGE OF CONTROL. Our rights plan provides, among other things, that if a
person or group attempts to acquire 15% or more of our common stock on terms not
approved by our Board of Directors, shareholders will be entitled to purchase
shares of our stock, subject to our charter's ownership limit. These purchase
rights would cause substantial dilution to a person or group that acquires or
attempts to acquire 15% or more of our common stock in this manner and, as a
result, could delay or prevent a change in control or other transaction that
could provide our shareholders

4
<PAGE>

with a premium over the then-prevailing market price of their shares or which
might otherwise be in their best interests.

WE HAVE A SHARE OWNERSHIP LIMIT. Primarily to assist us in maintaining
our REIT qualification, our charter limits ownership of the issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock by any single shareholder to 9.8% of our
outstanding capital stock. The attribution provisions of the federal tax laws
that are used in applying the ownership limit are complex. They may cause a
shareholder to be considered to own the stock of a number of related
shareholders. The ownership limit could inhibit changes of control.

THE LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE SALE COULD ADVERSELY
AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK. As of December 31, 1999, we had
outstanding approximately 20.7 million shares of common stock tradable without
restriction and had reserved for resale 15.7 million additional shares of common
stock for possible issuance upon redemption of units and 6.8 million shares for
possible issuance upon conversion of outstanding preferred stock. In addition,
we have reserved a number of shares available for possible issuance under our
employee benefit plans filed with the SEC. We may issue additional shares of
common stock and securities convertible into shares of common stock in the
future. We cannot predict the effect that future sales of shares of common
stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, will have on the market
prices of our shares.

CHANGES IN MARKET CONDITIONS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE OF
OUR COMMON STOCK. As with other publicly traded securities, the value of our
common stock depends on various market conditions, which may change from time to
time. Among the market conditions that may affect the value of our common stock
are:

- the extent of institutional investor interest in us;
- the reputation of REITs and residential REITs generally;
- the attractiveness of our equity securities in comparison to
other equity securities, including equity securities issued by
other real estate companies; and
- our financial condition and performance.

OUR EARNINGS AND CASH DISTRIBUTIONS WILL AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR
COMMON STOCK. We believe that the market value of a REIT's equity securities is
based primarily upon the market's perception of the REIT's growth potential and
its current and potential future cash distributions, and is secondarily based
upon the real estate market value of the underlying assets. For that reason, our
shares may trade at prices that are higher or lower than the net asset value per
share. To the extent we retain operating cash flow for investment purposes,
working capital reserves or other purposes, these retained funds, while
increasing the value of our underlying assets, may not correspondingly increase
the market price of our shares. In addition, we are subject to the risk that our
cash flow will be insufficient to meet the required payments on our preferred
shares. Our failure to meet the market's expectations with regard to future
earnings and cash distributions would likely adversely affect the market price
of our shares.

MARKET INTEREST RATES AND LOW TRADING VOLUME MAY HAVE AN EFFECT ON THE
VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK. One of the factors that investors consider important
in deciding whether to buy or sell shares of a REIT is the distribution rate on
those shares, as a percentage of the price of the shares, relative to market
interest rates. If market interest rates increase, prospective purchasers of our
shares may expect a higher annual distribution rate. Higher interest rates would
not, however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, in fact, would
likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for
distribution. This could cause the market price of our common stock to go down.
In addition, although our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange,
the daily trading volume of our shares may be lower than the trading

5
<PAGE>

volume for certain other industries. As a result, our investors who desire to
liquidate substantial holdings may find that they are unable to dispose of their
shares in the market without causing a substantial decline in the market value
of the shares.

WE BELIEVE, BUT CANNOT GUARANTEE, THAT WE QUALIFY AS A REIT. We believe
we qualify as a REIT and generally will not be subject to federal income tax on
net income that we distribute to our shareholders. However, our qualification as
a REIT involves the application of technical and complex tax rules. For
instance, if we own a company's securities, we cannot qualify as a REIT unless
the value of those securities does not exceed 5% of the total value of our
assets. We believe that we meet this requirement, but this belief is based on
our analysis of the value of each of the corporations that conduct our property
service businesses and on our conclusion that each of these corporations will be
respected as a separate corporation. Also, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot own
more than 10% of a company's voting securities. We also believe that we meet
this requirement, but this belief is based on our conclusion that the shares of
stock that we own in each of the property service businesses are not voting
securities. We cannot guarantee that the IRS will agree with us on these points.
Furthermore, for our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, we will be
precluded from owning more than 10% of the value of a company's securities
unless the company elects to be a taxable REIT subsidiary. The securities of the
property service businesses might be excepted from this rule. If they are not,
however, then these corporations would have to make the taxable REIT subsidiary
election because we hold more than 10% of the value of the securities of each of
them. At least two of our subsidiaries will make the taxable REIT subsidiary
election because they will not be excepted from the 10% value test, but we have
not yet made a determination as to the others.

Moreover, our ability to qualify as a REIT may depend on facts and
circumstances that may not be within our control. Even a technical or
inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, it is
possible that new tax laws or new interpretations of existing tax laws will
affect both our ability to qualify as a REIT and the tax consequences of REIT
qualification. For example, the asset tests described above will be modified for
our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000. We believe we will satisfy
the modified tests but we will need to change the tax status of one or more of
our subsidiaries to do so. For all of these reasons, we cannot guarantee that we
currently qualify or will be able to remain qualified as a REIT.

OUR FAILURE TO QUALIFY AS A REIT WOULD HAVE SERIOUS ADVERSE
CONSEQUENCES. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will be subject to federal
income tax at regular corporate rates. This additional tax would significantly
reduce the cash we would have available to distribute to our shareholders and
could reduce significantly the value of our common stock. In addition, if we
fail to qualify as a REIT, we may be disqualified from electing to be treated as
a REIT for the next four taxable years.

WE MAY NEED TO BORROW MONEY TO QUALIFY AS A REIT. To obtain the
favorable tax treatment associated with REITs, we currently are required each
year to distribute to our shareholders at least 95% of our net taxable income,
excluding net capital gain. For our taxable years beginning after December 31,
2000, this requirement will be relaxed but we still will be required to
distribute 90% of our net taxable income, excluding net capital gain.
Differences in timing between when we receive income and when we have to pay
expenses could require us to borrow money to meet this requirement. The impact
of large expenses also could have this effect. We might need to borrow money
even if we believe that market conditions are not favorable for borrowing.

WE ARE SUBJECT TO SOME TAXES EVEN IF WE QUALIFY AS A REIT. Even if we
qualify as a REIT, we are subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our
income and property. For example, we pay tax on certain types of income that we
do not distribute. Also, our income derived from properties located in the
District of Columbia is subject to local tax and our net income from some

6
<PAGE>

prohibited transactions will be subject to a 100% tax. In addition, we derive
income from the property service businesses, whose income is subject to federal,
state and local income tax. It should be noted that the property service
businesses currently take steps to limit their tax liability. If any one of
these corporations is required to elect to be treated as a taxable REIT
subsidiary, its ability to limit its tax liability will be reduced.

REDEEMING UNITHOLDERS WILL CONTINUE BE SUBJECT TO THE OPERATIONAL RISKS
OF OUR BUSINESS. An investment in our common stock will be subject to the
various operational risks of our business. These risks include the following:

- Our performance and ability to make distributions to our
shareholders are subject to risks associated with the real estate
industry. In particular --

- We are dependent on the Washington, D.C. metropolitan
area market.

- We may be unable to renew leases or relet space as leases
expire.

- New acquisitions may fail to perform as expected.

- Because real estate investments are illiquid and we are
subject to other restrictions, we may not be able to sell
properties when appropriate.

- Our properties may be subject to federal, state or local
regulations that could adversely affect distributions to
our shareholders.

- Environmental problems are possible and can be costly.

- Our properties in the District of Columbia are subject to
special tenants rights that may impede our sale of those
properties.

- Some potential losses are not covered by insurance.

- Debt financing, financial covenants, the amount or percentage of
our debt and increases in interest rates could adversely affect our
economic performance for the following reasons, among others--

- Our charter does not limit the amount or percentage of
debt that we may incur and this amount or percentage of
debt may limit our ability to obtain additional
financing.

- Our policy to limit debt may not ensure that we can incur
and continue to make expected distributions to
shareholders.

- We may not be able to refinance our debt on favorable
terms or make large payments on debt when our debts
become due.

- Rising interest rates could adversely affect our cash
flow.

- Our reliance on the property service businesses, where we lack
voting control, may adversely affect our shareholders. These
property services businesses, which provide management, leasing,
financing, insurance, engineering and technical services, and
tenant construction and renovation services, are conducted by three
operating companies in which Smith L.P. has a 99% economic interest
but does not own voting stock.

7
<PAGE>

- We are dependent on our key personnel with whom we do not have
employment agreements and for whom we do not have "key-person" life
insurance.

REDEMPTION OF UNITS

GENERAL

Each unitholder may, subject to certain limitations, require that Smith
L.P. redeem units held by the unitholder. If we do not assume Smith L.P.'s
obligation to redeem the units, upon redemption the unitholder will receive cash
from Smith L.P. in an amount equal to the market value of the units to be
redeemed. The market value of a unit for this purpose will be equal to the
average of the closing trading price of a share of our common stock for the ten
trading days before the day on which the redemption notice was received by Smith
L.P. The partnership agreement of Smith L.P. provides that if that trading
information is not available, we can use another method to determine the value
of the common stock. The partnership agreement does not specify alternative
valuation methodologies.

We have the right, however, to assume directly and satisfy the
redemption right of a unitholder by issuing our common stock or cash in exchange
for any units tendered for redemption. We generally expect that we will elect to
issue shares of our common stock in exchange for units tendered for redemption
rather than paying cash, although we will make the determination whether to pay
cash or issue common stock at the time units are tendered for redemption. With
each redemption, our interest in Smith L.P. will increase. Upon redemption, the
unitholder will no longer be entitled to receive distributions with respect to
the units redeemed. If units are redeemed for common stock, the unitholder will
have rights as a shareholder from the time the common stock is acquired.

A unitholder must notify Smith L.P. and us of the unitholder's desire
to require Smith L.P. to redeem units by sending a notice in the form attached
as an exhibit to Smith L.P.'s partnership agreement, a copy of which we can
provide to you upon request. The unitholder must request the redemption of at
least 1,000 units or all of the units held by such holder, if less. The
redemption generally will occur on the tenth business day after the notice is
delivered by the unitholder, except that no redemption or exchange can occur if
the delivery of common stock upon redemption would be prohibited under the
provisions of our charter designed to protect our REIT qualification or under
applicable federal or state securities laws.

TAX CONSEQUENCES OF REDEMPTION

The following discussion summarizes the material federal income tax
considerations that may be relevant to a unitholder who desires to have units
redeemed.

TAX TREATMENT OF A REDEMPTION OF UNITS. If we assume and perform Smith
L.P.'s redemption obligation, the redemption will be treated as a sale of units
by the unitholder at the time of the redemption. The sale will be fully taxable
to the unitholder in an amount equal to the sum of the cash or the value of the
common stock received in the exchange plus the amount of Smith L.P. nonrecourse
liabilities allocable to the redeemed units at the time of the redemption.

If we do not elect to assume the obligation to redeem units, Smith L.P.
will redeem the units for cash. If Smith L.P. redeems units for cash that we
contribute to Smith L.P. to effect the redemption, the redemption likely would
be treated for tax purposes as a sale of the units in a fully taxable
transaction, although the matter is not free from doubt. In that event, the
unitholder would be treated as realizing an amount equal to the sum of the cash
received in the exchange plus the

8
<PAGE>

amount of Smith L.P.'s nonrecourse liabilities allocable to the redeemed units
at the time of the redemption.

If Smith L.P. redeems units for cash that is not contributed by us to
effect the redemption, the tax consequences would depend on whether or not the
redemption is a redemption of all of a unitholder's units. If the redemption is
a redemption of all of a unitholder's units, the tax consequences would be the
same as described in the previous paragraph. If the redemption is a redemption
of less than all of a unitholder's units, the unitholder would not be permitted
to recognize any loss occurring on the transaction and would recognize taxable
gain only to the extent that the cash, plus the share of Smith L.P.'s
nonrecourse liabilities allocable to the redeemed units, exceeded the
unitholder's adjusted basis in all of the unitholder's units immediately before
the redemption.

TAX TREATMENT OF A SALE OF UNITS. If a unit redemption is treated as a
sale of the unit, the determination of gain or loss will be based on the
difference between the amount realized for tax purposes and the tax basis in the
unit. See "Basis of Units" below. The "amount realized" will be measured by the
sum of the cash and fair market value of common stock or other property received
plus the portion of Smith L.P.'s nonrecourse liabilities allocable to the unit
sold. To the extent that this amount exceeds the unitholder's tax basis in the
unit, the unitholder will recognize gain. It is possible that the amount of gain
recognized or even the tax liability resulting from the gain could exceed the
amount of cash and the value of common stock or any other property received upon
the redemption.

Except as described below, any gain recognized upon a sale or other
disposition of units will be treated as gain attributable to the sale or
disposition of a capital asset. To the extent, however, that the amount realized
attributable to a unitholder's share of "unrealized receivables" of Smith L.P.
exceeds the unitholder's basis attributable to those assets, the excess will be
treated as ordinary income. Unrealized receivables include, to the extent not
previously included in Smith L.P.'s income, any rights to payment for services
rendered or to be rendered. Unrealized receivables also include amounts that
would be subject to recapture as ordinary income if Smith L.P. had sold its
assets at their fair market value at the time of the transfer of a unit.

For individuals, trusts and estates, the maximum rate of tax on the net
capital gain from a sale or exchange of an asset held for more than 12 months is
20%. Net capital gain from the sale of an asset held 12 months or less is
subject to tax at the applicable rate for ordinary income. It should be noted
that the maximum rate for net capital gains attributable to the sale of
depreciable real property held for more than 12 months is 25% to the extent of
the prior depreciation deductions not otherwise recaptured as ordinary income
under existing depreciation recapture rules. Although this rule currently does
not apply to a redemption of units because units are not depreciable real
property, the IRS has proposed regulations that, if finalized, would apply this
rule to a redemption of units. If the proposed regulations are finalized without
material changes, any gain on the disposition of a unit held for more than 12
months would be treated partly as gain from the sale of a long-term capital
asset subject to a 20% tax rate, partly as gain from the sale of depreciable
real property subject to a 25% tax rate, and to the extent attributable to
"unrealized receivables," partly as ordinary income. This potential new rule
would not apply to the disposition of units held 12 months or less.

BASIS OF UNITS. In general, a unitholder who received units in exchange
for a contribution of property had an initial tax basis in the units equal to
the unitholder's basis in the contributed property. A unitholder's initial basis
generally is increased by the unitholder's share of Smith L.P.'s taxable income
and increases in the unitholder's share of the liabilities of Smith L.P.,
including any increase in the unitholder's share of nonrecourse liabilities. A
unitholder's initial basis generally is decreased, but not below zero, by the
unitholder's share of Smith L.P.'s distributions, decreases in the unitholder's
share of liabilities of Smith L.P., including nonrecourse liabilities, the
unitholder's

9
<PAGE>

share of losses of Smith L.P., and the unitholder's share of nondeductible
expenditures of Smith L.P. that are not chargeable to capital.

POTENTIAL APPLICATION OF THE DISGUISED SALE RULES TO A REDEMPTION OF
UNITS. There is a risk that if a unit is redeemed, particularly if it is
redeemed within two years of when it was issued, the IRS might contend that the
original transaction pursuant to which the units were issued should be treated
as a "disguised sale" of property. Under the IRS's disguised sale rules, unless
an exception applies, a partner's contribution of property to a partnership and
a simultaneous or subsequent transfer of money or other consideration, including
the assumption of or taking subject to a liability, from the partnership to the
partner may be treated as a sale, in whole or in part, of the property by the
partner to the partnership. If money or other consideration is transferred by a
partnership to a partner within two years of the partner's contribution of
property, the transactions are presumed to be a sale of the contributed property
unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish that the transfers do not
constitute a sale. If two years have passed between the transfer of money or
other consideration and the contribution of property, the transactions will not
be presumed to be a sale unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish
that the transfers constitute a sale.

COMPARISON OF OWNERSHIP OF UNITS AND COMMON STOCK

An investment in our common stock is substantially equivalent
economically to an investment in units in Smith L.P. A holder of a share of
common stock receives the same distribution that a holder of a unit receives and
shareholders and unitholders generally share equally in the risks and rewards of
ownership in our enterprise. There are, however, some differences between
ownership of units and ownership of shares of common stock, some of which may be
material to investors.

The comparisons below are intended to assist unitholders in
understanding how their investment will be changed if their units are redeemed
for common stock.

- ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------
SMITH L.P. CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY, INC.
- ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------

FORM OF ORGANIZATION AND ASSETS OWNED

<S> <C>
Smith L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership. Smith L.P. We are a Maryland corporation. We elected to be taxed as
owns interests, directly and through a subsidiary, in our a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and intend to
properties and, through subsidiaries, conducts our maintain our qualification as a REIT. Our only
management and leasing business. Smith L.P. is not significant asset is our interest in Smith L.P., which
permitted to take any action which would adversely affect gives us an indirect investment in the properties owned
our REIT status. by Smith L.P. Under Smith L.P.'s agreement, we generally
may not conduct any business other than in connection
with the ownership of interests in, and management of the
business of, Smith L.P.

10
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

- ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING PARTNERSHIP COMPANY
- ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------

ADDITIONAL EQUITY

<S> <C>
Smith L.P. is authorized to issue units and such other Our Board of Directors may authorize the issuances from
partnership interests, including partnership interests of time to time of additional equity securities of any class
different series or classes that may be senior to units, or series, or securities or rights convertible into such
as we may determine. Smith L.P. may issue units and other equity securities, for such consideration as the Board of
partnership interests to us in exchange for the proceeds Directors determines.
we raised in an offering of our comparable shares. In
addition, Smith L.P. will issue additional units upon
exercise of the options granted pursuant to our benefit
plans.

BORROWING POLICIES

Smith L.P. has no restrictions on borrowings, and we are Under Smith L.P.'s partnership agreement, we may not
authorized to borrow money on behalf of Smith L.P. Our incur any debts except those for which we may be liable
Board of Directors has adopted a policy that currently as general partner of Smith L.P. and in other limited
limits the debt-to-total market capitalization ratio of circumstances. Therefore, all debt we incur will be
Smith L.P. to 60%, but the Board of Directors may alter through Smith L.P.
this policy at any time.

</TABLE>

11
<PAGE>

MANAGEMENT CONTROL

<S> <C>
Generally, all management powers over the business and The Board of Directors has exclusive control over our
affairs of Smith L.P. are vested in us as general partner business and affairs. The policies adopted by the Board
of Smith L.P., and no limited partner of Smith L.P. has of Directors generally may be altered or eliminated
any right to participate in or exercise control or without a vote of our shareholders. Accordingly, except
management power over the business and affairs of Smith for their vote in the elections of directors,
L.P. Exceptions to this are that: shareholders will have no control over our ordinary
business policies. The Board of Directors cannot change
- - we cannot take any action contrary to Smith L.P.'s our policy of maintaining our REIT status, however,
partnership agreement without written consent of all without the approval of a majority of our shareholders.
the limited partners;

- - we cannot cause Smith L.P. to dispose of all or
substantially all of its assets without the consent
of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
units, including units we own;

- - until December 31, 2013, we cannot cause or permit
Smith L.P. to dissolve if one or more of the original
limited partners objects to such dissolution; and

- - from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2043, we
cannot cause or permit Smith L.P. to dissolve if
original limited partners holding at least 5% of the
units object to such dissolution.

The limited partners cannot remove us
as general partner.

FIDUCIARY DUTIES

Under Delaware law, we, as general partner of Smith L.P., Under Maryland law, the directors must perform their
are required to exercise good faith and integrity in all duties in good faith, in a manner that they reasonably
of our dealings relating to partnership affairs. Under believe to be in our best interests and with the care of
the partnership agreement, however, we are under no an ordinarily prudent person in a like position. Our
obligation to consider the tax consequences to, or directors who act in such a manner generally will not be
separate interests of, the limited partners in deciding liable to us for monetary damages arising from their
whether to cause Smith L.P. to take any actions. We are activities.
not liable for monetary damages for losses sustained,
liabilities incurred, or benefits not derived by the
limited partners in connection with such decisions,
provided that we have acted in good faith.

</TABLE>

12
<PAGE>

MANAGEMENT LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION

<S> <C>
We are liable for the obligations and debts of Smith Our charter provides that the liability of our directors
L.P., unless limits as to these liabilities are stated in and officers to us and to our shareholders for money
the document or instrument evidencing the obligation. damages is limited to the fullest extent permitted under
Smith L.P. has indemnified us and any of our directors or Maryland law. Our charter and state law provide broad
officers from and against all losses, claims, damages, indemnification to directors and officers, whether
liabilities, joint or several, expenses including legal serving us or, at our request, any other entity, to the
fees, fines, settlements and other amounts incurred in fullest extent permitted under Maryland law.
connection with any specified actions relating to the
operations of Smith L.P. in which we or any such director
or officer is involved. Smith L.P. will not indemnify us
or our directors or officers, however, if an act was done
in bad faith and was material to the lawsuit, any of us
received an improper personal benefit, or in the case of
any criminal proceeding, any of us had reasonable cause
to believe an act we did was unlawful. Smith L.P. may
reimburse reasonable expenses incurred by an indemnitee
in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding if
Smith L.P. receives an affirmation by the indemnitee of
his, her or its good faith belief that the standard of
conduct necessary for indemnification has been met and an
undertaking by such indemnitee to repay the amount if it
is determined that such standard was not met.

</TABLE>

13
<PAGE>

ANTITAKEOVER PROVISIONS

<S> <C>
Except in limited circumstances as described below under Our charter and by-laws and Maryland corporate law
"Voting Rights," we have exclusive management power over contain Except in limited circumstances as described
the business and affairs of Smith L.P. The limited below provisions that may delay or discourage an
partners cannot remove us as the general partner of Smith unsolicited under "Voting Rights," we have exclusive
L.P. We may prevent a limited partner from transferring management proposal to acquire us or to remove incumbent
an interest in Smith L.P. or any rights as a limited management. power over the business and affairs of Smith
partner except in limited circumstances. We may exercise L.P. The These provisions include, among others:
this right to deter, delay or hamper attempts by persons
to acquire a majority interest in Smith L.P.

- a staggered Board of Directors;

- authorized capital stock that may be classified and
issued as a variety of equity securities in the
discretion of the Board of Directors, including
securities having superior voting rights to the
common stock;

- restrictions on business combinations with persons
who acquire more than the percentage of common stock
specified in our charter;

- a requirement that directors may be removed only for
cause and only by a vote of at least 80% of the
outstanding common stock; and

- provisions designed to avoid concentration of share
ownership in a manner that would jeopardize our REIT
status under the Internal Revenue Code.

Our Board of Directors has also adopted a shareholder
rights plan which has some antitakeover effects. If
triggered, the shareholder rights plan would cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that sought to
acquire us without the approval of our Board of
Directors.

</TABLE>

14
<PAGE>

VOTING RIGHTS

<S> <C>
Limited partners have voting rights only as to the Holders of our common stock are entitled to vote on the
dissolution of Smith L.P., the sale of all or election and removal of directors and certain major
substantially all of the assets of Smith L.P. and corporate transactions, including most amendments to our
amendments of the partnership agreement. Otherwise, we charter, any proposal for our merger or consolidation
make all decisions relating to the operation and with or into another entity or the sale or disposition of
management of Smith L.P. As of December 31, 1999, we all or substantially all of our assets. Holders of common
owned approximately 59.9% of the units. As partners stock have one vote per share. Our charter permits the
redeem units, or if we acquire additional units in Board of Directors to classify and issue capital stock
exchange for the proceeds of offerings of our securities, having voting power that may differ from that of the
our percentage ownership of the units will increase. If common stock.
additional units are issued to third parties, our
percentage ownership of the units will decrease.

AMENDMENT OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OR THE CHARTER

We or any limited partner holding 25% or more of the Amendments to our charter must be approved by the Board
units may propose to amend the partnership agreement. of Directors and by the vote of at least two-thirds of
Such proposal, in order to be effective, must be approved the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting of
by the written vote of holders of at least a majority in shareholders. However, an amendment of the provisions
interest of Smith L.P. In addition, we may, without the relating to any of the classification of the Board of
consent of the limited partners, amend the partnership Directors, the power to remove directors and the share
agreement as to ministerial matters. ownership limits designed to maintain our REIT status
must be approved by an 80% vote. An amendment relating to
termination of our REIT status requires a majority vote
of the shareholders entitled to vote for such a matter.

VOTE REQUIRED TO DISSOLVE SMITH L.P. OR THE COMPANY

Through December 31, 2013, we cannot elect to dissolve Under Maryland law, the Board of Directors must obtain
Smith L.P. if any original limited partner who became a approval of holders of at least two-thirds of the
limited partner on June 30, 1994 holding units issued at outstanding shares of common stock to dissolve us.
such time objects to such dissolution. From January 1,
2014 through December 31, 2043, we cannot elect to
dissolve Smith L.P. if any original limited partner who
became a limited partner on June 30, 1994 and who held at
least 5% of the units on June 30, 1994 objects to such
dissolution. After January 1, 2044, we may dissolve Smith
L.P. without the consent of the limited partners.

</TABLE>

15
<PAGE>

VOTE REQUIRED TO SELL ASSETS

<S> <C>
We cannot cause Smith L.P. to sell, exchange, transfer or Under Maryland law, the Board of Directors is required to
otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of Smith obtain approval of the shareholders by the affirmative
L.P.'s assets without the consent of holders of a vote of two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast
majority of the outstanding units, including units we on the matter to sell all or substantially all of our
hold. We currently own a majority of the units and thus assets. No approval of the shareholders is required for
expect that we would control the outcome of such a vote. the sale of less than all or substantially all of our
assets.

VOTE REQUIRED TO MERGE

We generally cannot cause Smith L.P. to merge or Under Maryland law, the Board of Directors is required to
consolidate without the consent of holders of a majority obtain approval of the shareholders by the affirmative
of the outstanding units, including units we hold. We vote of two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast
currently own a majority of the units and thus expect on the matter in order to merge or consolidate us.
that we would control the outcome of such a vote.

LIABILITY OF INVESTORS

The liability of the limited partners for Smith L.P.'s Under Maryland law, shareholders are not personally
debts and obligations is generally limited to the amount liable for our debts or obligations. Shares of common
of their investment in Smith L.P., together with an stock, upon issuance, will be fully paid and
interest in any undistributed income, if any. Units, upon nonassessable.
issuance, will be fully paid and nonassessable.

REVIEW OF INVESTOR LISTS

Limited partners, upon written demand with a statement of Under Maryland law, a shareholder holding at least 5% of
the purpose of such demand and at the limited partner's our outstanding stock may upon written request inspect
expense, are entitled to obtain a current list of the and copy during usual business hours our shareholder
name and last known business, residence or mailing list.
address of each limited partner of Smith L.P.

</TABLE>

16
<PAGE>

THE FOLLOWING COMPARES CERTAIN OF THE INVESTMENT ATTRIBUTES AND LEGAL
RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE OWNERSHIP OF UNITS AND SHARES OF COMMON STOCK.

- ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------
UNITS SHARES
- ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------

NATURE OF INVESTMENT

<S> <C>
The units constitute equity interests entitling each Shares of our common stock constitute equity interests in
limited partner to his proportionate share of cash us. We are entitled to receive our proportionate share of
distributions made to the limited partners of Smith L.P. distributions made by Smith L.P. with respect to the
units, and each shareholder is entitled to a
proportionate share of any dividends or distributions
paid with respect to the common stock. The dividends
payable to the shareholders are not fixed in amount and
are only paid if, when and as declared by the Board of
Directors. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must
distribute at least 95% of our taxable income, excluding
capital gains, and any taxable income, including capital
gains, not distributed will be subject to corporate
income tax.

LIQUIDITY

Units may be transferred by a limited partner only with Our common stock is freely transferable, subject to the
our consent, which consent may be withheld in our sole ownership limit contained in our charter. The common
discretion. We will permit transfers of units only in stock is listed on the NYSE, and a public market for the
connection with gifts, bequests and transfers by a common stock exists. The breadth and strength of this
unitholder to family members and other persons. Subject secondary market will depend, among other things, upon
to conditions, each unitholder has the right to elect to the number of shares outstanding, our financial results
have the unitholder's units redeemed by Smith L.P. Upon and prospects, the general interest in us and in our real
redemption, such unitholder will receive, at our estate investments, and our dividend yield compared to
election, either shares of common stock or the cash that of other debt and equity securities.
equivalent in exchange for such units.

</TABLE>

17
<PAGE>

TAXATION

<S> <C>
Smith L.P. is not subject to federal income taxes. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT. So long as we
Instead, each holder of units includes his allocable qualify as a REIT, we will be permitted to deduct
share of Smith L.P.'s taxable income or loss in dividends paid to our shareholders, which effectively
determining his individual federal income tax liability. will reduce the "double taxation" that typically results
The maximum effective federal tax rate for individuals when a corporation earns income and distributes that
under current law is 39.6%. income to its shareholders in the form of dividends. Our
property service businesses, however, will not qualify as
Income and loss from Smith L.P. generally will be subject REITs and thus they will be subject to federal income tax
to the "passive activity" limitations. Under the "passive on their net income at normal corporate rates. The
activity" rules, income and loss from Smith L.P. that is maximum effective tax rate for corporations under current
considered "passive income" generally can be offset law is 35%.
against income and loss from other investments that
constitute "passive activities," unless Smith L.P. is Dividends we pay will be treated as "portfolio" income
considered a "publicly traded partnership," in which case and cannot be offset with losses from "passive
income and loss from Smith L.P. can be offset only activities."
against other income and loss from Smith L.P. Income of
Smith L.P., however, attributable to dividends from our Distributions we make to our taxable domestic
property service businesses or interest paid by the shareholders out of current or accumulated earnings and
property service businesses will not qualify as passive profits will be taken into account by them as ordinary
income and cannot be offset with losses and deductions income. Distributions in excess of current or accumulated
from a "passive activity," including losses and earnings and profits that are not designated as capital
deductions attributable to Smith L.P.'s multifamily gain dividends will be treated as a non-taxable return of
rental activities. basis to the extent of a shareholder's adjusted basis in
its shares of common stock, with the excess taxed as
Cash distributions from Smith L.P. will not be taxable to capital gain. Distributions that are designated as
a holder of units except to the extent they exceed the capital gain dividends generally will be taxed as gains
holder's basis in his interest in Smith L.P., which from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for
includes the holder's allocable share of Smith L.P.'s more than one year, to the extent they do not exceed our
debt. actual net capital gain for the taxable year. For our
taxable years commencing on or after January 1, 1998, we
Each year, holders of units receive a Schedule K-1 tax may elect to require our shareholders to include our
form containing detailed tax information for inclusion in undistributed net capital gains in their income. If we so
preparing their federal income tax returns. elect, shareholders would include their proportionate
share of such gains in their income and be deemed to have
Holders of units are required, in some cases, to file paid their share of the tax paid by us on such gains.
state income tax returns and/or pay state income taxes in
the states in which Smith L.P. owns property, even if
they are not residents of those states.

</TABLE>

18
<PAGE>

<S> <C>
Each year, shareholders receive Form 1099 used by
corporations to report dividends paid to their
shareholders.

Shareholders who are individuals generally will not be
required to file state income tax returns and/or pay
state income taxes outside of their state of residence
with respect to our operations and distributions. We may
be required to pay state income taxes in states where we
are authorized to do business.

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

GENERAL

The following discussion summarizes the material federal income tax
considerations to a prospective holder of our common stock. The following
discussion is for general information only, is not exhaustive of all possible
tax considerations, and is not intended to be and should not be construed as tax
advice. For example, it does not include a detailed discussion of any state,
local or foreign tax considerations. Nor does it discuss all of the aspects of
federal income taxation that may be relevant to a prospective shareholder in
light of its particular circumstances or to certain types of shareholders who
are subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws. For example,
the discussion does not discuss all of the aspects of federal income taxation
that may be relevant to insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial
institutions or broker-dealers, foreign corporations, and persons who are not
citizens or residents of the United States.

The information in this section is based on the Internal Revenue Code,
current, temporary and proposed regulations, the legislative history of the
Internal Revenue Code, current administrative interpretations and practices of
the IRS, and court decisions. The reference to IRS interpretations and practices
includes IRS practices and policies as endorsed in private letter rulings, which
are not binding on the IRS except with respect to the taxpayer that receives the
ruling. In each case, these sources are relied upon as they exist on the date of
this prospectus. No assurance can be given that future legislation, regulations,
administrative interpretations and court decisions will not significantly change
current law or adversely affect existing interpretations of existing law. Any
change of this kind could apply retroactively to transactions preceding the date
of the change. Except as described below in "--Requirements for Qualification As
a REIT--Gross Income Tests," we have not received any rulings from the IRS
concerning our tax treatment. Therefore, no assurance can be provided that the
statements made in the following discussion, which do not bind the IRS or the
courts, will not be challenged by the IRS or will be sustained by a court if so
challenged.

EACH PROSPECTIVE HOLDER OF COMMON STOCK IS URGED TO CONSULT WITH ITS
OWN TAX ADVISOR TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF ITS PERSONAL TAX SITUATION ON THE
ANTICIPATED TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE OWNERSHIP AND SALE OF COMMON STOCK. THIS
INCLUDES THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
OWNERSHIP AND SALE OF COMMON STOCK, AND THE POTENTIAL CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX
LAWS.

OUR TAX TREATMENT

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of
the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ending December 31,
1994. We believe that our company is organized and has operated in conformity
with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the
Internal Revenue Code and we intend to continue to operate as a REIT. We cannot
ensure, however, that we have operated in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT or
that we will continue to operate as a REIT in the future. Our qualification and
taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis the
various qualification tests imposed under the Internal Revenue Code. These tests
must be met on a continuing basis through actual annual operating results,
distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. While we intend to operate
so that we qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules
governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the
possibility of future changes in our circumstances, we cannot ensure that the
actual results of our operations for any taxable year (our company) have
satisfied or will satisfy the REIT requirements. Further, the anticipated income
tax treatment described herein may be changed, perhaps retroactively, by
legislative, administrative or judicial action at any time. See "Requirements
for Qualification as a REIT--Failure to Qualify."

-20-
<PAGE>

The following is a general description of the Internal Revenue Code
provisions that govern the federal income tax treatment of a REIT and its
shareholders. These provisions are highly technical and complex. This
description is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Internal Revenue Code
provisions, regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations
thereof, all of which are subject to change prospectively or retroactively.

In any year in which we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally
will not be subject to federal corporate income taxes on net income that we
distribute currently to shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates
the "double taxation" at the corporate and shareholder levels that generally
results from investment in a corporation. However, we will be subject to federal
income tax on any income that we do not distribute. In addition, in some
circumstances, we will be subject to federal income tax on some types of income
even though that income is distributed. Moreover, our property service business
subsidiaries do not qualify as REITs and are subject to federal corporate income
tax on their net income.

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFICATION AS A REIT.

ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS. The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT
as a corporation, trust or association--

1. that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

2. the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable
shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;

3. that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for Sections
856 through 859 of the Internal Revenue Code;

4. that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company
subject to certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;

5. the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;

6. during the last half of each taxable year not more than 50% in
value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities); and

7. that meets other tests, as described below, regarding the nature
of its income and assets.

The Internal Revenue Code provides that conditions (1) through (4),
inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (5)
must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a
proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. We believe that we
currently satisfy requirements (1) through (6). In addition, our charter
includes restrictions regarding the transfer of our shares that are intended to
assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in
(5) and (6) above. Moreover, if we comply with regulatory rules pursuant to
which we are required to send annual letters to holders of common stock
requesting information regarding the actual ownership of the common stock, and
we do not know, or exercising reasonable diligence would not have known, whether
we failed to meet requirement (6) above, we will be treated as having met the
requirement.

GROSS INCOME TESTS. In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, we
must satisfy two gross income requirements, which are applied on an annual
basis. First, at least 75% of our gross income, excluding gross income from
prohibited transactions, for each taxable year must be derived directly or
indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real
property or from some types of temporary investments. Investments relating to
real property or mortgages on real property include "rents from real property"
and, in some circumstances, interest. Second, at

-21-
<PAGE>

least 95% of our gross income, excluding gross income from prohibited
transactions, for each taxable year must be derived from sources that qualify
for purposes of the 75% test, and from dividends, interest and gain from the
sale or disposition of stock or securities, or from any combination of the
foregoing.

Rents we receive will qualify as "rents from real property" in
satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if
several conditions are met. These conditions relate to the identity of the
tenant, the computation of the rent payable, and the nature of the property
leased. We believe that the portion of the rents that we receive that fails to
qualify as "rents from real property" has not caused, and will not in the future
cause, us to fail to comply with the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Our belief
with respect to this matter, however, is based upon the advice of counsel with
respect to certain technical issues regarding the determination of "rents from
real property" that are not definitively answered under federal tax law. We
cannot ensure that the IRS will agree with these conclusions.

In addition, for rents received to qualify as "rents from real
property," we generally must not operate or manage the property or furnish or
render services to tenants. There are two exceptions to this rule. First, we can
engage in these activities through an "independent contractor" from whom we
derive no revenue. Second, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000,
we will be able to engage in these activities through a "taxable REIT
subsidiary." A taxable REIT subsidiary is a corporation other than a REIT in
which a REIT directly or indirectly holds stock and that has made a joint
election with the REIT to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary. For a further
discussion of taxable REIT subsidiaries, see "--Asset Tests" below. In addition,
the rule restricting us from operating or managing properties or furnishing or
rendering services to tenants does not apply to the extent that the services we
render are "usually or customarily rendered" in connection with the rental of
space for occupancy only and are not otherwise considered "rendered to the
occupant." These services are referred to as permissible services.

Smith L.P. and the property service businesses provide certain services
with respect to our properties. The property service businesses are not
independent contractors. We have received rulings from the IRS that the
provision of some of the services provided by Smith L.P. and the property
service businesses will not cause the rents received with respect to the
properties to fail to qualify as "rents from real property." In addition, for
our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, if one or more of our
property service businesses elects to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiary,
they will be permitted to provide services to our tenants that we currently must
provide through an independent contractor. We should emphasize, though, that a
final decision has not been made regarding which, if any, property service
businesses will elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries.

We also have received rulings from the IRS to the effect that certain
revenues will qualify as "rents from real property." These revenues include the
following:

1. rents from corporate apartments,

2. revenues from laundry equipment,

3. certain parking revenues, and

4. certain revenues related to the provision of telephone and cable
television services.

Based upon our experience in the multifamily and retail property rental
markets in which our properties are located, we believe that all services
provided to tenants by us, whether through Smith L.P. or through the property
service businesses, should be considered permissible services, although there
can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend otherwise. In this regard, if
Smith L.P. contemplates providing services in the future that reasonably might
be expected not to meet the

-22-
<PAGE>

"usual or customary" standard, we will arrange to have such services provided by
an independent contractor from which we receive no income or, for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2000, a taxable REIT subsidiary.

Even if we provide services that are not permissible services, rents
received generally will qualify as rents from real property so long as the
amount received for the "impermissible services" does not exceed a de minimis
amount. Specifically, so long as the amount received by us for all of the
impermissible services rendered at a specific property does not exceed one
percent of all of the amounts we receive, directly or indirectly, from that
property, then we can provide such services. The amount that we will be deemed
to have received for performing "impermissible services" will be the greater of
the actual amount received or 150% of the direct cost to us of providing those
services.

Smith L.P. may receive fees for the performance of property management
and other services with respect to properties in which Smith L.P. has a partial
interest. Only the portion of the management fee that corresponds to Smith
L.P.'s interest in such properties will qualify as "rents from real property."
The balance will not qualify. Smith L.P. also may receive certain other types of
non-qualifying income. This income includes, for example, certain expense
reimbursements, and dividends and interest from the property service businesses,
which qualify under the 95% gross income test but not under the 75% gross income
test. We believe, however, that the aggregate amount of these fees and other
non-qualifying income in any taxable year will not cause us to exceed the limits
on non-qualifying income under the 75% and 95% gross income tests.

If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or the 95% gross income
tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for the year
if we are entitled to relief under the Internal Revenue Code. We cannot state,
however, whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to this relief. Even
if this relief applied, a 100% tax would be imposed with respect to the "excess
net income" attributable to the failure to satisfy the 75% and 95% gross income
tests.

ASSET TESTS. In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, we are
currently subject to certain tests relating to the composition of our assets. As
described below, as a result of the Work Incentives Improvement Act, for our
taxable years commencing after December 31, 2000, the third test listed below
will be modified, and we also will become subject to a new asset test.
Currently, at the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must satisfy the
following tests relating to the nature of our assets.

1. At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented
by "real estate assets," cash, cash items, and government
securities.

2. Not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by
securities, other than those in the 75% asset class.

3. Of the investments included in the 25% asset class, the value of
any one issuer's securities we own may not exceed 5% of the value
of our total assets, and we may not own more than 10% of any one
issuer's outstanding voting securities.

Smith L.P. owns 100% of the nonvoting stock of each of the property
service businesses. In addition, Smith L.P. holds notes from each of the
property service businesses. By virtue of our ownership of units, we are
considered to own our proportionate share of the assets of Smith L.P., including
the securities of each of the property service businesses. We believe that our
share of the aggregate value of the securities of the property service
businesses together with all other assets that do not qualify for purposes of
the 75% test does not exceed 25% of the total value of our assets. We cannot
ensure, however, that the IRS will not contend that our share of the aggregate
value of these assets exceeds the 25% value limitation. In addition, we believe
that the value of our share of the securities of each of the property service
businesses individually does not exceed 5% of the total value

-23-
<PAGE>

of our assets. We cannot ensure, however, that the IRS will not contend either
that the value of the securities of one or more of the property service
businesses exceeds the 5% value limitation, or that all or some of the property
service businesses shall be viewed as a single corporation for purposes of the
5% value limitation and that the value of the securities of that corporation
exceeds the 5% value limitation.

Smith L.P. does not own more than 10% of the outstanding voting
securities of any of the property service businesses. Accordingly, we believe
that we meet the 10% voting securities test. We cannot ensure, however, that the
IRS will not contend that the nonvoting stock of one or more of the property
service businesses should be considered "voting securities" for purposes of the
10% voting securities test.

The 25% value test must be satisfied on the last day of each calendar
quarter in which we acquire any securities in the 25% asset class. The 5% value
test must be satisfied with respect to a property service business on the last
day of each calendar quarter in which we acquire securities of that business.
Accordingly, each time a unitholder exercises its right to redeem units and our
interest in Smith L.P. increases, the requirement will have to be met. Although
we plan to take steps to ensure that we satisfy the 25% and 5% value tests for
any quarter with respect to which retesting is to occur, we cannot ensure that
these steps always will be successful or will not require a reduction in Smith
L.P.'s overall interest in the property service businesses.

As a result of the Work Incentives Improvement Act, for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2000, the 5% value test and the 10% voting security
test will be modified in two respects. First, the 10% voting securities test
will be expanded so that we also will be prohibited from owning more than 10% of
the value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. Second, an exception
to these tests will be created so that we will be permitted to own securities of
a subsidiary that exceed the 5% value test and the new 10% vote or value test if
the subsidiary elects to be a taxable REIT subsidiary. We currently own more
than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of each property
service business. The expanded 10% vote or value test, however, will not apply
to a property service business unless it engages in a substantial new line of
business or acquires any substantial asset or we acquire any securities in the
property service business after July 12, 1999. At least two of the property
service businesses will make the taxable REIT subsidiary election, but a final
decision has not been made regarding which of the other property service
businesses, if any, will elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries.
Pursuant to a new asset test, for taxable years beginning after December 31,
2000, not more than 20% of the value of our total assets will be permitted to be
represented by securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries.

ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS. To qualify as a REIT, we generally
must distribute dividends to our shareholders in an amount at least equal to --

1. the sum of (a) 95% (90% for taxable years beginning after December
31, 2000) of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to
the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain, and (b) 95%
(90% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000) of our
net income after tax, if any, from foreclosure property, MINUS

2. the sum of certain items of noncash income.

Distributions must be made either during the taxable year to which they relate
or, if specific procedures are followed, during the subsequent taxable year. We
will be subject to tax on amounts not distributed at regular capital gains and
ordinary income rates.

In addition, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at
least the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income
and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years, we will be subject to a
4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of this required amount

-24-
<PAGE>

over the sum of the amounts we actually distribute and amounts retained with
respect to which we pay federal income tax.

We believe that we have made, and intend to continue to make, timely
distributions sufficient to satisfy the annual distribution requirements. It is
possible, however, that we, from time to time, may not have sufficient cash or
other liquid assets to meet these requirements. In that event, we may cause
Smith L.P. to arrange for short-term, or possibly long-term, borrowing to permit
the payments of required dividends.

FAILURE TO QUALIFY. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any
taxable year and the relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax,
including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at
regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under specific
statutory provisions, we also will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for
the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost.
We cannot state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to this
statutory relief.

TAX ASPECTS OF OUR INVESTMENTS IN SMITH L.P. AND THE PROPERTY SERVICE
BUSINESSES.

GENERAL. All of our investments are through Smith L.P. Smith L.P.
holds substantially all the real estate properties through some of the
subsidiary partnerships. This structure may involve special tax considerations.
These tax considerations include the following:

1. the allocations of income and expense items of Smith L.P. and
those subsidiary partnerships, which could affect the computation
of our taxable income;

2. the status of Smith L.P. and each applicable subsidiary
partnership as a partnership (as opposed to an association taxable
as a corporation) for income tax purposes; and

3. the taking of actions by Smith L.P. or any of the subsidiary
partnerships that could adversely affect our qualification as a
REIT.

We believe that Smith L.P. and each of the subsidiary partnerships will
be treated for tax purposes as partnerships (and not as associations taxable as
corporations). If, however, Smith L.P. or any of the subsidiary partnerships
were treated as an association taxable as a corporation, we would fail to
qualify as a REIT.

TAX ALLOCATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTIES. Smith L.P. was formed
by way of contributions of appreciated property, including several apartment
properties, at the time of its formation. In addition, it has acquired a number
of properties by contribution since that time. When property is contributed to a
partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership, the partnership
generally takes a carryover basis in that property for tax purposes equal to the
adjusted basis of the contributing partner in the property, rather than a basis
equal to the fair market value of the property at the time of contribution. This
difference is referred to as a "book-tax difference."

Smith L.P.'s partnership agreement requires that all allocations of
partnership income, gain and loss be made in a manner consistent with Section
704(c) of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable regulations. Therefore,
allocations will tend to eliminate the book-tax differences with respect to the
contributed properties over the life of Smith L.P. However, the allocation rules
of Section 704(c) of the Internal Revenue Code may not always entirely eliminate
the book-tax difference on an annual basis or with respect to a specific taxable
transaction such as a sale. Consequently, the carryover basis of contributed
properties in the hands of Smith L.P. could cause us to be allocated lower
amounts of depreciation and other deductions for tax purposes than would be
allocated to us if no property had a book-tax difference. Similarly, the
carryover basis of contributed properties in the hands of Smith L.P. could cause
us to be allocated taxable gain in the event of a sale

-25-
<PAGE>

of contributed properties in excess of the economic or book income allocated to
us as a result of such sale.

PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES. A significant portion of the amounts used
by Smith L.P. to fund distributions to partners, which in turn are used by us to
fund distributions to holders of common stock, comes from the property service
businesses, through payments on notes issued by the property service businesses
and dividends on nonvoting stock of the property service businesses held by
Smith L.P. The property service businesses do not qualify as REITs and therefore
pay federal, state and local income taxes on their net income at normal
corporate rates. To the extent that they do so, the cash available for
distribution to shareholders is reduced accordingly.

The property service businesses attempt to limit the amount of those
taxes. We cannot ensure, however, whether or the extent to which measures taken
to limit taxes will be successful. Even if those measures are successful, future
increases in the income of the property service businesses inevitably will be
subject to income tax. Moreover, as described above in "--Requirements for
Qualification As a REIT--Gross Income Tests" and "--Asset Tests," two or more of
the property service businesses will elect to be treated as a taxable REIT
subsidiary for years commencing after December 31, 2000. The property service
businesses that make this election will be restrained in their ability to limit
their tax liability for two reasons. First, taxable REIT subsidiaries will be
limited signicantly in their ability to deduct interest payments made to an
affiliated REIT. Accordingly, if a property service businesses elects to be
treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary, it will be limited significantly in its
ability to deduct interest payments on notes issued to Smith L.P. Second, if a
taxable REIT subsidiary pays an amount to a REIT that exceeds the amount that
would be paid in an arm's length transaction, the REIT generally will be subject
to an excise tax equal to 100% of the excess. This rule generally will apply to
amounts paid to Smith L.P. by the property service businesses that elect to be
treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Our ownership of the securities of the property service businesses
currently is subject to certain asset tests. Although, these tests will change
for our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, they will continue to
restrict the ability of the property service businesses to increase the size of
their respective businesses unless the value of the assets of Smith L.P.
increase at a commensurate rate. In addition, Smith L.P. currently is prohibited
from exercising control over any of the property service businesses. For our
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, Smith L.P. will continue to be
prohibited from exercising control over each property service business that does
not elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiary. For a more detailed
discussion of the ownership limitations relating to our ownership of the
property service businesses, see "--Requirements for Qualification As a
REIT--Asset Tests," above.

TAXATION OF SHAREHOLDERS

TAXATION OF TAXABLE DOMESTIC SHAREHOLDERS. As used herein, the term
"U.S. shareholder" means a holder of common stock who for United States federal
income tax purposes is --

1. a citizen or resident of the United States,

2. a corporation, partnership, or other entity created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States or of any political
subdivision of the United States,

3. an estate or trust the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source, or

4. a trust whose administration is subject to the primary supervision
of a United States court and which has one or more United States
persons who have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust.

-26-
<PAGE>

As long as we qualify as a REIT, distributions made to our taxable U.S.
shareholders out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, which are not
designated as capital gain dividends, will be taken into account by them as
ordinary income. Corporate shareholders will not be eligible for the dividends
received deduction with respect to these dividends. For purposes of determining
whether the distributions on shares of common stock are out of current or
accumulated earnings and profits, our earnings and profits will be allocated
first to shares of preferred stock and second to shares of common stock. We
cannot ensure that we will have sufficient earnings and profits to cover any
distributions on preferred stock or common stock.

To the extent they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the
taxable year, distributions that are designated as capital gain dividends will
be taxed to taxable non-corporate U.S. shareholders as gains from the sale or
exchange of a capital asset held for more than one year. This tax treatment
applies regardless of the period non-corporate shareholders have held their
stock. Non-corporate U.S. shareholders include individuals, estates, and trusts.
On November 10, 1997, the IRS issued Notice 97-64, which provides generally that
we may classify portions of our designated capital gain dividend in the
following categories:

1. a 20% gain distribution, which would be taxable to taxable
non-corporate U.S. shareholders at a maximum rate of 20%,

2. an unrecaptured Section 1250 gain distribution, which would be
taxable to taxable non-corporate U.S. shareholders at a maximum
rate of 25%, or

3. a 28% gain distribution which would be taxable to taxable
non-corporate U.S. shareholders at a maximum rate of 28%.

In light of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, which
eliminates the 18-month holding period that was required to be met to take
advantage of the lowest capital gain tax rates, the IRS is expected to issue
clarifying guidance regarding the designation of REIT capital gain dividends.
Notice 97-64 provides that a REIT must determine the maximum amounts that it may
designate as 20% and 25% capital gain dividends by performing the computation
required by the Internal Revenue Code as if the REIT were an individual whose
ordinary income were subject to a marginal tax rate of at least 28%. Notice
97-64 further provides that designations made by the REIT only will be effective
to the extent that they comply with Revenue Ruling 89-81, which requires that
distributions made to different classes of shares be composed proportionately of
dividends of a particular type.

To the extent that they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for
the taxable year, distributions made by us that are properly designated as
capital gain dividends will be taxable to taxable corporate U.S. shareholders as
long-term capital gain. This tax treatment applies regardless of the period
corporate shareholders have held their stock. Those corporate U.S. shareholders,
however, may be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as
ordinary income.

Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits
will not be taxable to a taxable U.S. shareholder to the extent that they do not
exceed the adjusted basis of the shareholder's common stock, but rather will
reduce the adjusted basis of such common stock. To the extent that distributions
exceed the adjusted basis of a taxable U.S. shareholder's common stock, they
will be included in income as capital gains, assuming the common stock is a
capital asset in the hands of the shareholder.

In general, a taxable U.S. shareholder will realize gain or loss on the
disposition of common stock equal to the difference between the amount of cash
and the fair market value of any property received on such disposition and the
U.S. shareholder's adjusted basis of such common stock. This gain or loss will
be capital gain or loss if the common stock has been held as a capital asset. In
the case of a taxable U.S. shareholder that is a corporation, such capital gain
or loss will be long-term

-27-
<PAGE>

capital gain or loss if such common stock has been held for more than one year.
Generally, in the case of a taxable non-corporate U.S. shareholder, such capital
gain or loss will be taxed for dispositions occurring after December 31, 1997,
at a maximum rate of 20%, and for dispositions occurring after December 31,
2000, at a maximum rate of 18% if the common stock is acquired after December
31, 2000 and held for more than five years. The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997
allows the IRS to issue regulations relating to how the act's new capital gain
rates will apply to sales of capital assets by "pass-through entities," which
include REITs such as us, and to sales of interests in "pass-through entities."
The IRS has proposed regulations under this authority, but as proposed, the
regulations do not apply to the taxation of gain and loss realized on the
disposition of common stock. However, the proposed regulations could be revised
to apply to the disposition of common stock, and additional regulations that
would apply to the disposition of common stock could be promulgated.
Shareholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to
the rules contained in the Taxpayer Relief Act.

Loss upon a sale or exchange of common stock by a taxable U.S.
shareholder who has held the common stock for six months or less, after applying
certain holding period rules, will be treated as long-term capital loss to the
extent the distributions from us are required to be treated by the shareholder
as long-term capital gain. For a taxable non-corporate U.S. shareholder, the
long-term capital loss will be apportioned among the applicable long-term
capital gain groups to the extent that distributions received by such U.S.
shareholder were previously so treated.

We may elect to require the holders of common stock to include our
undistributed net capital gains in their income. If we make this election, the
holders of common stock will include in their income as long-term capital gains
their proportionate share of such undistributed capital gains. They will be
deemed to have paid their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on the
undistributed capital gains and receive in return a credit or refund for this
amount. A holder of common stock will increase the basis in its common stock by
the difference between the amount of capital gain included in its income and the
amount of the tax it is deemed to have paid. Our earnings and profits will be
adjusted appropriately.

Under certain circumstances, U.S. shareholders may be subject to backup
withholding at the rate of 31% with respect to dividends paid.

TAXATION OF TAX-EXEMPT SHAREHOLDERS. We do not expect our distributions
to a shareholder that is a tax-exempt entity will constitute "unrelated business
taxable income" ("UBTI"), provided that the tax-exempt entity has not financed
the acquisition of its common stock with "acquisition indebtedness" within the
meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, and the common stock is not otherwise used
in an unrelated trade or business of the tax-exempt entity. For a tax-exempt
shareholder that is a social club, voluntary employee benefit association,
supplemental unemployment benefit trust, or qualified group legal services plan
exempt from federal income taxation under Internal Revenue Code Sections 501
(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) or (c)(20), respectively, income from an investment in
us will constitute UBTI unless the organization is able to properly deduct
amounts set aside or placed in reserve so as to offset the income generated by
its investment in us. The prospective shareholder should consult its own tax
advisors concerning these "set aside" and reserve requirements.

Notwithstanding the above, however, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act of 1993 provides that, effective for taxable years beginning in 1994, a
portion of the dividends paid by a "pension held REIT" shall be treated as UBTI
as to any trust which is described in Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code, is tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and holds
more than 10%, by value, of the interests in the REIT. Tax-exempt pension funds
that are described in Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code are referred
to below as "qualified trusts." A REIT is a "pension held REIT" if it meets the
following two tests:

-28-
<PAGE>

1. it would not have qualified as a REIT but for the fact that
Section 856(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, added by the 1993
Act, provides that stock owned by qualified trusts shall be
treated, for purposes of determining whether the REIT is closely
held, as owned by the beneficiaries of the trust rather than by
the trust itself; and

2. either at least one such qualified trust holds more than 25% by
value, of the interests in the REIT, or one or more such qualified
trusts, each of which owns more than 10%, by value, of the
interests in the REIT, hold in the aggregate more than 50%, by
value, of the interests in the REIT.

The percentage of any REIT dividend treated as UBTI is equal to the
ratio of the UBTI earned by the REIT, treating the REIT as if it were a
qualified trust and therefore subject to tax on UBTI, to the total gross income
of the REIT. A DE MINIMIS exception applies where the percentage is less than 5%
for any year. The provisions requiring qualified trusts to treat a portion of
REIT distributions as UBTI will not apply if the REIT is able to satisfy the
"not closely held" requirement without relying upon the "look-through" exception
with respect to qualified trusts. Based on the current estimated ownership of
our common and preferred stock and as a result of certain limitations on
transfer and ownership of common and preferred stock contained in the our
charter, we believe that we should not be classified as a "pension held REIT."

TAXATION OF FOREIGN SHAREHOLDERS. In the following paragraphs,
nonresident alien individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships and
other foreign shareholders will be referred to collectively as foreign
shareholders. The rules governing U.S. federal income taxation of foreign
shareholders are complex. No attempt will be made in the following paragraphs to
provide more than a limited description of these rules. Prospective foreign
shareholders should consult with their own tax advisors to determine the impact
of U.S. federal, state and local income tax laws with regard to an investment in
common stock, including any reporting requirements.

Distributions that are not attributable to gain from sales or exchanges
by us of U.S. real property interests or are not designated by us as capital
gain dividends will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent
that they are made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. These
distributions, ordinarily, will be subject to a withholding tax equal to 30% of
the gross amount of the distribution unless an applicable tax treaty reduces
that tax. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and
profits will not be taxable to a foreign shareholder to the extent that they do
not exceed the adjusted basis of the shareholder's common stock, but rather will
reduce the adjusted basis of such common stock. To the extent that such
distributions exceed the adjusted basis of a foreign shareholder's common stock,
they will give rise to tax liability if the foreign shareholder otherwise would
be subject to tax on any gain from the sale or disposition of his common stock
as described below.

As a result of a legislative change made by the Small Business Job
Protection Act of 1996, it appears that we will be required to withhold 10% of
any distribution in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits.
Consequently, although we intend to withhold at a rate of 30% on the entire
amount of any distribution, or a lower applicable treaty rate, to the extent
that we do not do so, any portion of a distribution not subject to withholding
at a rate of 30%, or a lower applicable treaty rate, will be subject to
withholding at a rate of 10%. However, the foreign shareholder may seek a refund
of such amounts from the IRS if it subsequently determined that the distribution
was, in fact, in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, and
the amount withheld exceeded our foreign shareholder's United States tax
liability, if any, with respect to the distribution.

Distributions to a foreign shareholder that are designated by us as a
capital gain dividend, other than those arising form the disposition of a U.S.
real property interest, generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income
taxation unless the investment in the common stock is effectively

-29-
<PAGE>

connected with a U.S. trade or business or the foreign shareholder is a
nonresident alien individual who is present in the U.S. for 183 days or more
during the taxable year and has a tax home in the US. We will be required to
withhold and remit to the IRS 35% of any distributions to foreign shareholders
that are designated as capital gain dividends, or, if greater, 35% of a
distribution that could have been designated as a capital gain dividend.

For any year in which we qualify as a REIT, distributions that are
attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of U.S. real property interests
will be taxed to a foreign shareholder under the provisions of the Foreign
Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 ("FIRPTA"), at the normal capital
gain rates applicable to U.S. shareholders, subject to applicable alternative
minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident
alien individuals. This tax treatment will apply whether or not the
distributions are designated as a capital gain dividend. Also, distributions
subject to FIRPTA may be subject to a 30% branch profits tax in the hands of a
corporate foreign shareholder not entitled to treaty relief or exemption. We are
required by applicable regulations to withhold 35% of any distribution that we
could designate as a capital gain dividend. This amount is creditable against
the foreign shareholder's FIRPTA tax liability.

Although the law is not clear on the matter, it appears that amounts we
designate pursuant to the Taxpayer Relief Act as undistributed capital gains in
respect of shares of common stock generally should be treated with respect to
foreign shareholders in the same manner as actual distributions by us of capital
gain dividends. Under that approach, foreign shareholders would be able to
offset as a credit against the resulting United States federal income tax
liability their proportionate share of the tax we paid on such undistributed
capital gains. Also under that approach, foreign shareholders would be able to
receive from the IRS a refund to the extent their proportionate share of the tax
we paid exceeded their actual United States federal income tax liability.

Gain recognized by a foreign shareholder upon a sale of common stock
generally will not be taxed under FIRPTA if we are a "domestically controlled
REIT." Generally, a "domestically controlled REIT" is a REIT in which at all
times during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of its stock was
held directly or indirectly by foreign persons. We believe that we currently are
a "domestically controlled REIT," and, therefore, the sale of common stock
generally will not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. If gain on the sale of
common stock were to be subject to tax under FIRPTA, foreign shareholders would
be subject to the same treatment as U.S. shareholders with respect to this gain,
subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum
tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. The purchaser of common stock
from a foreign shareholder would be required to withhold and remit to the IRS
10% of the purchase price.

BACKUP WITHHOLDING TAX AND INFORMATION REPORTING. Backup withholding
tax generally is a withholding tax imposed at the rate of 31% on certain
payments to persons that fail to furnish certain information under the United
States information reporting requirements. Backup withholding tax and
information reporting will generally not apply to distributions paid to foreign
shareholders outside the United States that are treated as --

1. dividends subject to the 30% (or lower treaty rate) withholding
tax discussed above,

2. capital gains dividends, or

3. distributions attributable to gain from our sale or exchange of
United States real property interests.

As a general matter, backup withholding and information reporting will
not apply to a payment of the proceeds of a sale of common stock by or through a
foreign office of a foreign broker. Information reporting (but not backup
withholding) will apply, however, to a payment of the proceeds of a sale of
common stock by a foreign office of a broker that --

-30-
<PAGE>

1. is a United States person,

2. derives 50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from
the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, or

3. is a "controlled foreign corporation," generally, a foreign
corporation controlled by United States shareholders, for United
States tax purposes, unless the broker has documentary evidence in
its records that the holder is a foreign shareholder and certain
other conditions are met, or the shareholder otherwise establishes
an exemption.

Payment to or through a United States office of a broker of the
proceeds of a sale of common stock is subject to both backup withholding and
information reporting unless the shareholder certifies under penalty of perjury
that the shareholder is a foreign shareholder, or otherwise establishes an
exemption. A foreign shareholder may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld
under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund
with the IRS.

The IRS has recently finalized regulations regarding the withholding
and information reporting rules discussed above. In general, these regulations
do not alter the substantive withholding and information reporting requirements
but unify certification procedures and forms and clarify and modify reliance
standards. Pursuant to IRS Notice 98-16, these regulations generally will be
effective for payments made after December 31, 2000, subject to certain
transition rules. Valid withholding certificates that are held on December 31,
1999, will remain valid until the earlier of December 31, 2000 or the date of
expiration of the certificate under rules currently in effect (unless otherwise
invalidated due to changes in the circumstances of the person whose name is on
such certificate). A foreign shareholder should consult its own advisor
regarding the effect of these regulations.

OTHER TAX CONSIDERATIONS

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNINCORPORATED BUSINESS
TAX. Our company and our shareholders may be subject to state or local taxation
in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we or they
transact business or reside. Our state and local tax treatment and that of our
shareholders may not conform to the federal income tax consequences discussed
above. Consequently, prospective shareholders should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an investment in
common stock.

In this regard, the District of Columbia imposes an unincorporated
business income tax, at an effective rate of 9.975% on the "District of Columbia
taxable income" of partnerships doing business in the District of Columbia.
Because some of our properties are located in the District of Columbia, the
partnership owning these properties will be subject to this tax. In effect, our
share of the "District of Columbia taxable income" attributable to properties
located in the District of Columbia will be subject to this tax. Smith L.P. and
its subsidiary partnerships will attempt to reduce the amount of income that is
considered "District of Columbia taxable income." However, it is likely that
some portion of the income attributable to properties located in the District of
Columbia will be subject to the District of Columbia tax. To the extent Smith
L.P. or a subsidiary partnership is required to pay this tax, the cash available
for distribution to us and, therefore, to our shareholders as dividends will be
reduced. Moreover, our shareholder will not receive a credit against its own
state income tax liability for its share of any District of Columbia
unincorporated business income tax paid by Smith L.P. or a subsidiary
partnership. This tax would not apply if we were to own and operate our assets
directly, rather than through Smith L.P. However, our ability to eliminate Smith
L.P. and thus own its assets directly is severely limited.

-31-
<PAGE>

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We may issue the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus
to parties who received units in exchange for our acquisition of the Terrace
Apartments and Park West Apartments, if they request redemption of their
units. A redeeming unitholder (who is not otherwise one of our affiliates)
who receives any shares of common stock covered by this prospectus will be
entitled to sell such shares without restriction in the open market or
otherwise.

We will acquire one Unit from a redeeming unitholder in exchange for
each share of common stock that we issue. Thus, with each redemption, our
interest in Smith L.P. will increase.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

This prospectus does not contain all of the information included in the
registration statement. We have omitted parts of the registration statement in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information,
we refer you to the registration statement on Form S-3, including its exhibits.
Statements contained in this prospectus about the provisions or contents of any
agreement or other document are not necessarily complete. If SEC rules and
regulations require that such agreement or document be filed as an exhibit to
the registration statement, please see such agreement or document for a complete
description of these matters. You should not assume that the information in this
prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of each
document.

We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. You may read and copy materials that we have
filed with the SEC, including the registration statement, at the following SEC
public reference rooms:

<TABLE>

<S> <C> <C>
450 Fifth Street. N.W. 7 World Trade Center 500 West Madison Street
Room 1024 Suite 1300 Suite 1400
Washington, D.C. 20549 New York, New York 10048 Chicago, Illinois 60661

</TABLE>

Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the
public reference rooms.

Our SEC filings can also be read at the following address:

New York Stock Exchange
20 Broad Street
New York, New York 10005

Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC's Web Site
at http://www.sec.gov.

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE

The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" the information we file
with them, which means that we can disclose important information to you by
referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is
considered to be part of this prospectus, and later information filed with the
SEC will update and supersede this information. We incorporate by reference the
documents listed below and any future filings made with the SEC under Section
13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

1. Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on August 16, 1994
registering our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange
Act.

-32-
<PAGE>

2. Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on December 9, 1998
registering our rights under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act.

3. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998
(amended on Form 10-K/A).

4. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1999, the quarter ended June 30, 1999 and the quarter ended
September 30, 1999.

5. Current Reports on Form 8-K dated January 5, 1999 (amended on Form
8-K/A), January 27, 1999, July 2, 1999 (amended on Form 8-K/A),
September 8, 1999 (amended on Form 8-K/A) and December 21, 1999.

You may request a copy of these filings (other than exhibits and
schedules to such filings, unless such exhibits or schedules are specifically
incorporated by reference into this prospectus), at no cost, by writing or
calling us at the following address:

Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
2345 Crystal Drive
Arlington, Virginia 22202
Attention: Mr. Gregory Samay, Vice President and Treasurer
(703) 769-1000

You should rely on the information incorporated by reference or
provided in this prospectus. We have authorized no one to provide you with
different information. We are not making an offer of the common stock in any
state where the offer is not permitted.

EXPERTS

Our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998
and the related schedule incorporated by reference in this prospectus and
elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by Arthur Andersen
LLP, independent public accountants, as indicated in their report dated February
9, 1999 relating to such financial statements, and are included in this
prospectus in reliance upon the authority of Arthur Andersen LLP as experts in
giving such report.

The consolidated balance sheets of Countryside Residential Partners,
Ltd. as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in partners' capital and cash flows incorporated by reference in this
prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement, have been audited by
Klayman & Korman LLC, independent public accountants, as indicated in their
report dated February 1, 1999, and are included in this prospectus in reliance
upon the authority of Klayman & Korman LLC as experts in giving such report.

The balance sheet of Somerset Limited Partnership as of December 31,
1998, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' capital and
cash flows incorporated by reference in this prospectus and elsewhere in the
registration statement, have been audited by Klayman & Korman LLC, independent
public accountants, as indicated in their report dated February 3, 1999, and are
included in this prospectus in reliance upon the authority of Klayman & Korman
LLC as experts in giving such report.

The balance sheet of 2900 Van Ness Associates as of December 31, 1998,
and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows
incorporated by reference in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration
statement, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP,

-33-
<PAGE>

independent public accountants, as indicated in their report dated May 25, 1999,
and are included in this prospectus in reliance upon the authority of Ernst &
Young LLP as experts in giving such report.

LEGAL MATTERS

In connection with this prospectus, Hogan & Hartson L.L.P., Washington,
D.C. has provided its opinion as to the validity of the issuance of the common
stock offered by this prospectus and the discussion of tax matters in this
prospectus.

-34-
<PAGE>

<TABLE>

======================================================= ===============================================

<S> <C>
YOU SHOULD RELY ON THE INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY [GRAPHIC OMITTED]
REFERENCE OR PROVIDED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. WE HAVE
AUTHORIZED NO ONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH DIFFERENT 424,242 SHARES
INFORMATION. WE ARE NOT MAKING AN OFFER OF THE COMMON
STOCK IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER IS NOT PERMITTED. CHARLES E. SMITH
YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS RESIDENTIAL REALTY, INC.
PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THE
DATE ON THE FRONT OF THIS DOCUMENT.

TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMON STOCK

PAGE

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY............................... 1
RISK FACTORS..................................... 3
REDEMPTION OF UNITS.............................. 8 PROSPECTUS
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS................ 20
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION............................. 32
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION.............. 32
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE.. 32
EXPERTS.......................................... 33
LEGAL MATTERS.................................... 34 JANUARY __, 2000

======================================================= ===============================================

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

The following table sets forth those expenses for distribution to be
incurred in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities
being registered.

<TABLE>

<S> <C>
Registration Fee.......................................................................... $ 3,903
Printing and Duplicating Expenses......................................................... 1,000
Legal Fees and Expenses................................................................... 30,000
Accounting Fees and Expenses.............................................................. 10,000
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses................................................................ 5,000
Miscellaneous............................................................................. 1,000
-----------

Total..................................................................................... $50,903
===========

</TABLE>

ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Our officers and directors are and will be indemnified under Maryland
law, our charter, and our partnership agreement of Smith L.P. against certain
liabilities. Our charter requires us to indemnify our directors and officers to
the fullest extent permitted from time to time by the laws of Maryland. Our
charter also provides that, to the fullest extent permitted under Maryland law,
our directors and officers will not be liable to us and our shareholders for
money damages.

Section 2-418 of the Maryland General Corporation Law generally permits
indemnification of any director made a party to any proceedings by reason of
service as a director unless it is established that (i) the act or omission of
such person was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was
committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; or
(ii) such person actually received an improper personal benefit in money
property or services; or (iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding, such
person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.
The indemnity may include judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and
reasonable expenses actually incurred by the director in connection with the
proceeding; but, if the proceeding is one by or in the right of the corporation,
indemnification is not permitted with respect to any proceeding in which the
director has been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, or if the proceeding
is one charging improper personal benefit to the director, whether or not
involving action in the director's official capacity, indemnification of the
director is not permitted if the director was adjudged to be liable on the basis
that personal benefit was improperly received. The termination of any proceeding
by conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, or any entry
of an order of probation prior to judgment, creates a rebuttable presumption
that the director did not meet the requisite standard of conduct required for
permitted indemnification. The termination of any proceeding by judgment, order
or settlement, however, does not create a presumption that the director failed
to meet the requisite standard of conduct for permitted indemnification.

The partnership agreement also provides for indemnification of us, or
any of our directors or officers, in our capacity as general partner of Smith
L.P., from and against all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or
several, expenses (including legal fees), fines, settlements and other amounts
incurred in connection with any actions relating to the operations of Smith L.P.
as set forth in the partnership agreement.

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS

3.1(a) Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
3.2(b) Articles Supplementary relating to Series A
Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
3.3(c) Articles Supplementary relating to Series B
Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
3.4(c) Certificate of Correction relating to Series B Cumulative
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
3.5(d) Articles Supplementary relating to Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock
3.6(e) Certificate of Correction relating to Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock
3.7(f) Articles Supplementary relating to Series D Junior
Participating Preferred Stock

II-1
<PAGE>

3.8(g) Articles Supplementary relating to Series E, F and G
Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
3.9(h) Articles Supplementary relating to Series H
Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
3.10(i) Our Amended and Restated Bylaws
4.1(j) First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Smith L.P., as amended
4.2(j) Certificate of Limited Partnership of Smith L.P.
4.3(k) Rights Agreement
5.1 Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. regarding legality of the
Common Stock
8.1 Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. regarding certain tax
matters
23.1 Consent of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 5.1)
23.2 Consent of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 8.1)
23.3 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
23.4 Consent of Klayman & Korman LLC
23.5 Consent of Klayman & Korman LLC
23.6 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
24 Power of Attorney (included on signature page (II-4))

- ---------

a Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our registration statement
on Form S-11 (File No. 33-75288).
b Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 (File No. 1-13174).
c Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our current report on Form
8-K dated October 3, 1997 (File No. 1-13174).
d Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to our registration statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-17053).
e Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to our registration statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-17053).
f Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our current report on Form
8-K dated December 2, 1998 (File No. 1-13174).
g Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3,
respectively, to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 1-13174).
h Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 (File No. 1-13174).
i Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our registration statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 33-93986).
j Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit to
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994
(File No. 1-13174).
k Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our current report on Form
8-K dated December 2, 1998 (File No. 1-13174).

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being
made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3)
of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising
after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate,
represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in this registration
statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of
securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not
exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of
the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus
filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in
volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum
aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of registration Fee"
table in the effective registration statement;

II-2
<PAGE>

(iii) To include any material information with respect to the
plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or
any material change to such information in this registration statement;

PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) do not apply if the
registration statement is on Form S-3, Form S-8 or Form F-3, and the information
required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is
contained in the periodic reports filed by the registrant pursuant to Section 13
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated by
reference in this registration statement.

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be
a new registration statement relating to the Securities offered herein, and the
offering of such Securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial BONA
FIDE offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment
any of the Securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of
the offering.

The undersigned Registrant hereby further undertakes that, for the
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
filing of the Registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that is incorporated by reference
in this registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the Securities offered herein, and the offering of such
Securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial BONA FIDE offering
thereof. The undersigned Registrant hereby further undertakes that:

(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of
this registration statement in reliance under Rule 430A and contained in a form
of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or
497(h) under the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of this
registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial BONA FIDE offering thereof.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of
the Registrant pursuant to the provisions described under Item 15 of this
registration statement, or otherwise (other than insurance), the Registrant has
been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in such Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the Securities being
registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication
of such issue.

II-3

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all
the requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this Registration
Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the County of Arlington, Commonwealth of Virginia, on January 18,
2000.

CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY, INC.

By: /s/ Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
Name: Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr.
Title: President and Chief Operating Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints each of Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr. and Robert
D. Zimet, or either one of them, as true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full
power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any amendments to this Registration Statement (including
post-effective amendments), and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name Title Date
---- ----- ----

<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Robert H. Smith Co-Chairman of the Board, Co-Chief Executive January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------- Officer, and Director
Robert H. Smith

/s/ Robert P. Kogod Co-Chairman of the Board, Co-Chief Executive January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------- Officer, and Director
Robert P. Kogod

/s/ Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr. President, Chief Operating Officer, January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------- and Director
Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr.

/s/ Wesley D. Minami Senior Vice President and Chief Financial January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------- Officer
Wesley D. Minami

/s/ Steven E. Gulley Controller and Chief Accounting Officer January 18, 2000
- -------------------------------------
Steven E. Gulley

</TABLE>

II-4
<PAGE>

<TABLE>

<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Charles B. Gill Director January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------
Charles B. Gill

/s/ R. Michael McCullough Director January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------
R. Michael McCullough

/s/ Mandell J. Ourisman Director January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------
Mandell J. Ourisman

/s/ L. Ronald Scheman Director January 18, 2000
- ------------------------------------
L. Ronald Scheman

</TABLE>

II-5

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT SEQUENTIALLY
NUMBER EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION NUMBERED PAGE

<S> <C> <C>
3.1(a) Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.............................
3.2(b) Articles Supplementary relating to Series A Cumulative
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock.........................................
3.3(c) Articles Supplementary relating to Series B Cumulative
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock.........................................
3.4(c) Certificate of Correction relating to Series B Cumulative
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock.........................................
3.5(d) Articles Supplementary relating to Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock.....................................................
3.6(e) Certificate of Correction relating to Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock.....................................................
3.7(f) Articles Supplementary relating to Series D Junior
Participating Preferred Stock..................................................
3.8(g) Articles Supplementary relating to Series E, F and G
Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock..............................
3.9(h) Articles Supplementary relating to Series H
Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock..............................
3.10(i) Our Amended and Restated Bylaws................................................
4.1(j) First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership ...................
of Smith L.P., as amended......................................................
4.2(j) Certificate of Limited Partnership of Smith L.P................................
4.3(k) Rights Agreement...............................................................
5.1 Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. regarding legality of the
Common Stock...................................................................
8.1 Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. regarding certain tax
matters........................................................................
23.1 Consent of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 5.1)....................
23.2 Consent of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 8.1)....................
23.3 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.................................................
23.4 Consent of Klayman & Korman LLC................................................
23.5 Consent of Klayman & Korman LLC................................................
23.6 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP...................................................
24 Power of Attorney (included on signature page (II-4))

</TABLE>

- -------------------
a Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our registration statement
on Form S-11 (File No. 33-75288).

b Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 (File No. 1-13174).

c Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our current report on Form
8-K dated October 3, 1997 (File No. 1-13174).

d Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to our registration statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-17053).

e Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to our registration statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-17053).

f Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our current report on Form
8-K dated December 2, 1998 (File No. 1-13174).

g Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3,
respectively, to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 1-13174).

h Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 (File No. 1-13174).

i Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our registration statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 33-93986).

j Incorporated by reference to the same titled and numbered exhibit to
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994
(File No. 1-13174).

<PAGE>

k Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our current report on Form
8-K dated December 2, 1998 (File No. 1-13174).

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 5.1

[Letterhead of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.]

January 18, 2000

Board of Directors
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
2345 Crystal Drive
Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia 22202

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are acting as counsel to Charles E. Smith Residential
Realty, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), in connection with its
registration statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the proposed issuance of up to
424,242 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share (together
with the Rights (as defined below), the "Shares"), and up to 424,242 associated
preferred stock purchase rights (the "Rights") to be issued pursuant to the
Rights Agreement (as defined below), which may be issued if and to the extent
that the holders of 424,242 units of limited partnership interest (the "Units")
in Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") tender
such Units for redemption. This opinion letter is furnished to you at your
request to enable you to fulfill the requirements of Item 601(b)(5) of
Regulation S-K, 17 C.F.R. Section 229.601(b)(5), in connection with the
Registration Statement.

For purposes of this opinion letter, we have examined copies
of the following documents:

1. An executed copy of the Registration Statement.

2. The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
(the "Articles") of the Company, as certified by the
Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State
of Maryland on December 13, 1999 and by the Secretary
of the Company on the date hereof as being complete,
accurate, and in effect.

3. The Bylaws of the Company, as certified by the
Secretary of the Company on the date hereof as being
complete, accurate, and in effect.

4. The Certificate of Limited Partnership of the
Operating Partnership, as amended, as certified by
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on
December 13, 1999 and by the Secretary of the

<PAGE>

Board of Directors
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
January 18, 2000
Page 2

Company, as general partner of the Operating
Partnership, on the date hereof as being complete,
accurate, and in effect.

5. The First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as amended,
as certified by the Secretary of the Company, as
general partner of the Operating Partnership, on the
date hereof as being complete, accurate, and in
effect (the "Partnership Agreement").

6. An executed copy of the Rights Agreement (the "Rights
Agreement"), dated as of December 2, 1998, between
the Company and First Union National Bank, as rights
agent (the "Rights Agent").

7. Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company
adopted at a meeting held on July 21, 1998, as
certified by the Secretary of the Company on the date
hereof as being complete, accurate, and in effect,
relating to the issuance and sale of the Shares and
arrangements in connection therewith.

8. Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company
(the "Board") adopted at a meeting held on December
2, 1998, as certified by the Secretary of the Company
as of the date hereof as being complete, accurate and
in effect, authorizing, among other things, the
distribution of the Rights to holders of record of
the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share,
as of the close of business on December 14, 1998, the
appointment of First Union National Bank as Rights
Agent, and the listing of the Rights on the Exchange.

In our examination of the aforesaid certificates, documents
and agreements, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal
capacity of all natural persons, the accuracy and completeness of all documents
submitted to us, the authenticity of all original documents, and the conformity
to authentic original documents of all documents submitted to us as copies
(including telecopies). We have assumed that (i) the Rights Agent has all
requisite power and authority under all applicable laws, regulations and
governing documents to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under the
Rights Agreement, (ii) the Rights Agent has duly authorized, executed and
delivered the Rights Agreement, (iii) the Rights Agent is validly existing and
in good standing in all necessary jurisdictions, (iv) the Rights Agreement
constitutes a valid and binding obligation, enforceable against the Rights Agent
in accordance with

<PAGE>

Board of Directors
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
January 18, 2000
Page 3

its terms, (v) there has been no material mutual mistake of fact or
misunderstanding or fraud, duress or undue influence in connection with the
negotiation, execution or delivery of the Rights Agreement and (vi) the Rights
will be issued in accordance with the Rights Agreement. In addition, we have
assumed that the Shares will not be issued in violation of the ownership limit
contained in the Articles. This opinion letter is given, and all statements
herein are made, in the context of the foregoing.

This opinion letter is based as to matters of law solely on
the Maryland General Corporation Law, as amended. We express no opinion herein
as to any other laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, or regulations. As used
herein, the term "Maryland General Corporation Law, as amended" includes the
statutory provisions contained therein, all applicable provisions of the
Maryland Constitution and reported judicial decisions interpreting these laws.

Based upon, subject to and limited by the foregoing, we are of
the opinion that following (i) effectiveness of the Registration Statement and
(ii) issuance of the Shares, if and when issued and delivered in accordance with
the terms of the Partnership Agreement and the resolutions of the Board of
Directors of the Company authorizing the issuance of the Shares upon redemption
of the Units as contemplated thereby, the Shares will be validly issued, fully
paid, and nonassessable.

The opinion set forth above, insofar as it relates to the
Rights, is limited to the valid issuance of the Rights under Maryland law.

This opinion letter has been prepared for your use in
connection with the Registration Statement and speaks as of the date hereof. We
assume no obligation to advise you of any changes in the foregoing subsequent to
the delivery of this opinion letter.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion letter as
Exhibit 5.1 to the Registration Statement and to the reference to this firm
under the caption "Legal Matters" in the prospectus constituting a part of the
Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not thereby admit that we
are an "expert" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
--------------------------
HOGAN & HARTSON L.L.P.

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 8.1

[Letterhead of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.]

January 18, 2000

Board of Directors
Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
2345 Crystal Drive
Crystal City
Arlington, VA 22202

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as counsel to Charles E. Smith Residential
Realty, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the
registration statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") and the
prospectus included therein (the "Prospectus") filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the possible issuance by the
Company of up to 424,242 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.01
per share (the "Redemption Shares"), if and to the extent that, the Company
elects to issue such Redemption Shares to the holders of up to 424,242 units of
Limited Partnership interests ("Units") in Charles E. Smith Residential Realty
L.P. (the "Operating Partnership"), which Units were issued by the Operating
Partnership in connection with the acquisition of Terrace Apartments, a
residential property located in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, and Park West
Apartments, a residential property located in Chicago, Illinois, upon the tender
of such Units for redemption. In connection with the Registration Statement, we
have been asked to provide you with our opinion on certain federal income tax
matters. Capitalized terms used in this letter and not otherwise defined herein
have the meanings set forth in the Registration Statement.

BASES FOR OPINION

The opinion set forth in this letter is based on relevant
current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), Treasury Regulations thereunder (including proposed and temporary
Treasury Regulations), and interpretations of the foregoing as expressed in
court decisions, existing administrative rulings and practices of the Internal
Revenue Service (the "IRS") (including the private letter ruling issued by the
IRS to the Company on June 8, 1994, as supplemented by the ruling letter dated
June 16, 1995, and the private letter ruling issued by the IRS to the Company on
August 27, 1997), and legislative history, all as of the date hereof. These
provisions and interpretations are subject to changes, which may or may not be
retroactive in effect, that might result in material modifications of our
opinion.

<PAGE>

Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
January 18, 2000
Page 2

In rendering the following opinion, we have examined such
statutes, regulations, records, certificates and other documents as we have
considered necessary or appropriate as a basis for such opinion, including the
following: (1) the Registration Statement; (2) the First Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as amended as of
January 31, 1995, as certified by the Secretary of the Company on the date
hereof as being a true, correct and complete copy and as being in full force and
effect; (3) the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company
dated as of June 27, 1994, as certified by the Department of Assessments and
Taxation of the State of Maryland on December 13, 1999 and by the Secretary of
the Company on the date hereof as being a true, correct and complete copy and as
being in full force and effect; (4) the agreements of limited partnership of the
partnership subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership; (5) the articles of
organization and stock ownership records of the four operating companies (Smith
Realty Company, Smith Management Construction, Inc., Combustioneer Corporation,
and Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc.) which provide property services to
the properties owned by the Operating Partnership and to other multifamily,
retail, and office properties (collectively, the "Property Service Businesses");
(6) the articles of incorporation of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the
Company that serve as the general partners of the various subsidiary financing
partnerships (the "REIT Subs"); and (7) other necessary documents. The opinion
set forth in this letter also is premised on certain written representations of
the Company contained in a letter to us dated as of the date hereof (the
"Management Representation Letter"). Any variation or difference in the facts
from those set forth in the documents that we have reviewed and upon which we
have relied (including, in particular, those set forth in the Management
Representation Letter) may adversely affect the conclusions stated herein.

We have made such factual and legal inquiries, including
examination of the documents set forth above, as we have deemed necessary or
appropriate for purposes of our opinion. For purposes of rendering our opinion,
however, we have not made an independent investigation or audit of the facts set
forth in the above referenced documents, including the Management Representation
Letter. We consequently have relied upon representations in the Management
Representation Letter that the information presented in such documents or
otherwise furnished to us accurately and completely describes all material facts
relevant to our opinion. We are not aware, however, of any material facts or
circumstances inconsistent with the representations we have relied upon as
described herein or other assumptions set forth herein.

<PAGE>

Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
January 18, 2000
Page 3

Moreover, we have assumed that (i) the Company, the Operating
Partnership, each of the REIT Subs, each of the partnership subsidiaries, and
each of the Property Services Businesses have been and will continue to be
operated in the manner described in the relevant partnership agreement, articles
(or certificate) of incorporation, or other organizational documents; (ii) as
represented by the Company, there are no agreements or understandings between
the Company or the Operating Partnership, on the one hand, and the partnerships
that own the voting stock of the Property Services Businesses (the "Voting Stock
Partnerships") or their partners, on the other, that are inconsistent with the
relevant Voting Stock Partnership being considered to be both the record and
beneficial owner of more than 90% of the outstanding voting stock of the
respective Property Services Businesses; and (iii) the Company is a validly
organized and duly incorporated corporation under the laws of the State of
Maryland, each of the Property Services Businesses and each of the REIT Subs are
validly organized and duly incorporated corporations under the laws of the State
of Delaware or the Commonwealth of Virginia (as applicable), and the Operating
Partnership and each of the subsidiary partners are duly organized and validly
existing partnerships under the applicable laws of the State of Delaware.

In our review, we have assumed that all of the representations
and statements set forth in the documents that we reviewed (including the
Management Representation Letter) are true and correct, and all of the
obligations imposed by any such documents on the parties thereto, including
obligations imposed under the Articles of Incorporation of the Company, have
been and will continue to be performed or satisfied in accordance with their
terms. We also have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the proper
execution of all documents, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as
originals, the conformity to originals of documents submitted to us as copies,
and the authenticity of the originals from which any copies were made.

OPINION

Based upon, subject to, and limited by the assumptions and
qualifications set forth herein, we are of the opinion as follows:

1. The Company was organized and has operated in conformity with the
requirements for qualification and taxation as a real estate investment
trust ("REIT") under the Code for its taxable years ending December 31,
1995, December 31, 1996, December 31, 1997, December 31, 1998, and
December

<PAGE>

Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
January 18, 2000
Page 4

31, 1999, and the Company's current organization and method of
operation, as described in the Management Representation Letter, will
enable it to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and
taxation as a REIT.

2. The discussions in the Prospectus under the headings "Federal Income
Tax Considerations" and "Redemption of Units - Tax Consequences of
Redemption," to the extent that they describe provisions of federal
income tax law, are correct in all material respects.

Our opinion is limited to the opinions described above. Our
opinion does not, and is not intended to, address the tax consequences to any
Unitholder with respect to the acquisition, ownership, redemption, or
disposition of its Units.

We assume no obligation to advise you of any changes in our
opinion subsequent to the delivery of this opinion letter. The Company's
qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon the Company's ability to meet
on a continuing basis, through actual annual operating and other results, the
various requirements under the Code with regard to, among other things, the
sources of its gross income, the composition of its assets, the level of its
distributions to stockholders, and the diversity of its stock ownership. Hogan &
Hartson L.L.P. has relied upon representations of the Company with respect to
these matters and will not review the Company's compliance with these
requirements on a continuing basis. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that
the actual results of the Company's operations, the sources of its income, the
nature of its assets, the level of its distributions to stockholders and the
diversity of its stock ownership for any given taxable year will satisfy the
requirements under the Code for qualification and taxation as a REIT.

An opinion of counsel merely represents counsel's best
judgment with respect to the probable outcome on the merits and is not binding
on the IRS or the courts. There can be no assurance that positions contrary to
our opinion will not be taken by the IRS, or that a court considering the issue
would not hold contrary to such opinion. Furthermore, no assurance can be given
that future legislative, judicial or administrative changes, on either a
prospective or retroactive basis, would not adversely affect the accuracy of the
opinion expressed herein. Nevertheless, we undertake no responsibility to advise
you of any such changes.

<PAGE>

Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.
January 18, 2000
Page 5

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion letter as
Exhibit 8.1 to the Registration Statement and to the use of the name of the firm
therein. In giving the consent, we do not thereby admit that we are an "expert"
within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
--------------------------
Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.3

[Letterhead of Arthur Andersen]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated February
9, 1999 included in Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc.'s previously
filed Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and to all references
to our Firm included in this registration statement.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Vienna, Virginia
January 18, 2000

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.4

[Letterhead of Klayman & Korman, LLC]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement on Form S-3 of our report dated February 2, 1999, on our review
of the financial statements of 2470 North Clark Street Venture. We also
consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".

/s/ Klayman & Korman, LLC

Chicago, Illinois
January 11, 2000

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.5

[Letterhead of Klayman & Korman, LLC]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement on Form S-3 of our report dated February 3, 1999, on our review
of the financial statements of Infinity Terrace, L.L.C. We also consent to
the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".

/s/ Klayman & Korman, LLC

Chicago, Illinois
January 11, 2000

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.6

[Letterhead of Ernst & Young LLP]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated May 25, 1999, in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 and related Prospectus of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty,
Inc. for the registration of 424,242 shares of its common stock.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated May 25, 1999 with respect to the financial statements of 2900 Van
Ness Associates for the year ended December 31, 1998 and included in the
Form 8-K/A (pages F-15 through F-23) of Charles E. Smith Residential
Realty, Inc. dated July 2, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

January 18, 2000
Indianapolis, Indiana