DIME BANCORP INC
SC 14D9/A, 2000-03-31
SAVINGS INSTITUTION, FEDERALLY CHARTERED
Previous: RENAISSANCE CAPITAL GROWTH & INCOME FUND III INC, 10-K, 2000-03-31
Next: DIME BANCORP INC, 425, 2000-03-31



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   ----------

                                 SCHEDULE 14D-9
                                 (RULE 14d-101)

                   SOLICITATION/RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT UNDER
             SECTION 14(d)(4) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                (Amendment No. 4)

                               DIME BANCORP, INC.
                            (Name of Subject Company)


                               DIME BANCORP, INC.
                      (Name of Person(s) Filing Statement)

                     COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE
           (INCLUDING THE ASSOCIATED PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS)
                         (Title of Class of Securities)

                                     25429Q
                      (CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)

                              JAMES E. KELLY, ESQ.
                                 GENERAL COUNSEL
                               DIME BANCORP, INC.
                                589 FIFTH AVENUE
                                    3RD FLOOR
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
                                 (212) 326-6170
   (Name, address and telephone number of person authorized to receive notice
        and communications on behalf of the person(s) filing statement)

                                    Copy to:

                             MITCHELL S. EITEL, ESQ.
                               SULLIVAN & CROMWELL
                                125 BROAD STREET
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10004
                                 (212) 558-4000

          [_]  Check the box if the filing relates solely to preliminary
               communications made before the commencement of a tender offer.


<PAGE>


         This Amendment No. 4 amends and supplements the solicitation/
recommendation statement on Schedule 14D-9 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 21, 2000, as subsequently amended on March 21,
2000, March 22, 2000 and March 24, 2000 (as so amended, the "Schedule 14D-9"),
by Dime Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Dime"), in relation to the
exchange offer disclosed in the Schedule TO, dated March 15, 2000 (as amended
from time to time, the "Schedule TO"), of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("North Fork"), and Fleet Boston Corporation, a Rhode
Island corporation ("FleetBoston"), to exchange each issued and outstanding
share of Dime common stock, par value $0.01 per share, for 0.9302 of a share of
North Fork common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and $2.00 in cash, upon the
terms and subject to the conditions described in the Schedule TO, the
Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 by North Fork on March 15, 2000 and the
Prospectus relating to North Fork's common stock dated March 14, 2000 and
contained therein (each of which may be amended from time to time and each of
which is an Exhibit and incorporated by reference into North Fork's Schedule
TO).

ITEM 4.  THE SOLICITATION OR RECOMMENDATION.

Item 4 is hereby supplemented and amended by adding the following:

         On March 31, 2000, Dime began sending to its shareholders the letter of
Lawrence J. Toal, dated March 29, 2000, that is included herewith as Exhibit
(a)(19) and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9.  EXHIBITS.

Item 9 is hereby supplemented and amended by adding the following:


Exhibit
Number             Description
- ------             -----------

(a)(19)            Letter to Shareholders dated March 29, 2000



                                       -2-

<PAGE>



                                    SIGNATURE

         After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify
that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.


                                            DIME BANCORP, INC.


                                            By:  /s/ James E. Kelly
                                               -------------------------
                                            Name:   James E. Kelly
                                            Title:  General Counsel


Dated:  March 31, 2000





                                       -3-

<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit
Number             Description
- ------             -----------

(a)(19)            Letter to Shareholders dated March 29, 2000




                                       -4-


                                                                 Exhibit (a)(19)



                                   [Dime Logo]

                               DIME BANCORP, INC.




Dear Fellow Stockholder:

         I want to send this personal message to you to accompany the enclosed
report of our financial results for 1999. As you will see, 1999 was an excellent
year for Dime. Operating earnings per share increased 15% from 1998 and
important measures of performance such as operating returns on assets and
stockholders' equity set new records. More importantly, in 1999 we maintained
our strong earnings momentum as we continued our transformation to become more
commercial bank-like.

         In 1999:

          o    Dime recorded four consecutive quarters of higher operating
               earnings per share (reported earnings adjusted for the effects of
               certain non-recurring or unusual items), extending a streak that
               began in the second quarter of 1996.

          o    On an operating earnings basis, our return on average
               stockholders' equity was 16.74% and our return on average assets
               was 1.11%.

         Also in 1999, and reflecting our long-term strategy to become more
commercial bank-like:

          o    Dime's consumer, commercial real estate and business banking loan
               portfolios increased by more than $3 billion, or 83%, compared
               with year-end 1998. This growth, coupled with an 8% reduction in
               our residential loan portfolio, resulted in these non-residential
               loans representing 46% of loans outstanding at year-end 1999, up
               from 30% at the end of 1998.

          o    Core deposits (demand, money market and savings) grew $778
               million, or 11%, and at year-end 1999, they represented 54% of
               total deposits, up from 51% at the end of 1998.

          o    Net interest income grew 10% to $578 million from $527 million in
               1998, while the net interest margin increased 23 basis points, to
               2.91%, despite rising interest rates.

          o    Non-interest income totaled $568 million, up from $525 million in
               the prior year, as increases in fee income more than offset a
               reduction in net gains on sales activities.

         This is a strong record of achievement - one that was accomplished
despite a challenging economic environment for financial institutions, including
a sharp reduction in the demand for residential mortgage credit.

         It is equally important to consider our 1999 performance as part of our
ongoing transformation. The following table evidences our progress over the past
three years:

                                 1996             1999            Change
                                 ----             ----            ------
                                      (at or for the year ended)

Net Income                   $104 million    $240 million         Up 130%
Return on Average Assets         0.52%              1.09%         Up 110%
Return on Average Equity         10.36%            16.46%         Up 49%
Earnings Per Share               $0.96            $ 2.13          Up 122%
Book Value Per Share             $9.76            $13.67          Up 40%
<PAGE>

         I am also pleased to report that throughout this period, Dime has also
held true to its mission statement goal of being active in its communities, and
we were recently awarded our fifth consecutive rating of "outstanding" for
compliance with the federal Community Reinvestment Act. Dime is one of only five
institutions in the nation to have earned five such ratings stretching over a
decade. This is truly a remarkable achievement and one that underscores the role
that Dime plays in the fabric of the communities we serve.

         Given this demonstrated record of financial performance, strength of
franchise and brand, and positive momentum, we would have expected that Dime
stockholders would have been rewarded with an increased valuation. However, and
to the contrary, we all have been deeply disappointed by the unsatisfactory
performance of our stock. It is small comfort that the performance of our stock,
in large measure, reflects trends in the overall market, but let me assure you
that Dime's focus has always been and will continue to be managing the business
in the best interests of our stockholders. Nonetheless, it is particularly
frustrating to see a record of consistently improving fundamentals and
profitability go unrecognized by the market in terms of improved returns to our
stockholders.

         Finally, let me comment on the developments of the past several weeks.
On March 5, 2000, North Fork Bancorporation began an unsolicited and hostile
offer for Dime. As you know from the materials that we have distributed to you,
your Board, after careful consideration, unanimously rejected that offer because
it believes that the offer is being made for the wrong price, by the wrong
company, at the wrong time and is unlikely to succeed. North Fork's hostile
actions, which include multiple lawsuits and distorted disclosure, have not
changed your Board's belief, but, in fact, reinforced it. In sum, the Board has
concluded that North Fork's offer is inadequate and not in the best interests of
Dime and you, its stockholders. Accordingly, your Board of Directors has
unanimously recommended that you reject North Fork's offer by not tendering your
shares. The Board's reasons are discussed in more detail in the
solicitation/recommendation statement we mailed to stockholders on March 20,
2000. I urge you to read that document carefully.

         In closing, I want to assure you that, as fellow stockholders, your
Board of Directors, management, and staff, are committed to enhancing
stockholder value and we will leave no stone unturned in pursuing this goal.
With your continued support, I am confident that we will be able to deliver
significantly improved returns.

                                            Sincerely yours,

                                            /s/ Lawrence J. Toal

March 29, 2000



         Investors are urged to read Dime and Hudson's proxy
statement/prospectus, and any amendments or supplements when they become
available, as well as any solicitation/recommendation statement that may be
filed by Dime, because they contain important information. Each of these
documents has been or will be filed with the SEC and investors may obtain a free
copy of them at the SEC's Internet web site at www.sec.gov. These documents may
also be obtained for free from Dime by directing such request to: Dime Bancorp,
Inc., Investor Relations Dept., 589 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, telephone:
(212) 326-6170, or Innisfree M&A Incorporated at (888) 750-5834.

         Dime, its directors and executive officer and certain other persons may
be deemed "participants" in any solicitation of proxies from Dime stockholders.
Information regarding the participants in any solicitation is contained in a
statement on Schedule 14A filed by Dime with the SEC on March 22, 2000.


                                       2




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission