<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-13094
DIME BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 11-3197414
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
589 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 326-6170
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No
-------- -------
As of October 31, 2000, the registrant had 108,457,653 shares of common stock,
$0.01 par value, outstanding.
<PAGE> 2
DIME BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2000 and 3
December 31, 1999
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2000 and 1999 4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2000 and 1999 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 6
2000 and 1999
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 36
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds 38
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 38
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 38
SIGNATURES 39
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
2000 1999
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 325,721 $ 414,289
Money market investments 13,085 18,166
Securities available for sale 3,341,773 3,849,676
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock 328,732 328,732
Loans held for sale 2,363,552 1,733,667
Loans receivable, net:
Residential real estate loans 7,995,503 8,200,120
Commercial real estate loans 3,973,993 3,482,857
Consumer loans 2,941,984 2,495,321
Business loans 1,139,558 1,028,756
Allowance for loan losses (146,655) (140,296)
-------------- --------------
Total loans receivable, net 15,904,383 15,066,758
-------------- --------------
Premises and equipment, net 188,125 207,373
Mortgage servicing assets 980,228 980,934
Goodwill 508,928 531,415
Other assets 1,277,815 790,315
-------------- --------------
Total assets $25,232,342 $23,921,325
============== ==============
LIABILITIES
Deposits $13,903,058 $14,261,449
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 3,260,488 1,106,067
Other short-term borrowings 4,640,463 5,321,838
Long-term debt 1,004,769 1,165,868
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in Dime Bancorp, Inc.'s junior
subordinated deferrable interest debentures 152,236 152,219
Other liabilities 485,158 397,779
-------------- --------------
Total liabilities 23,446,172 22,405,220
-------------- --------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (40,000,000 shares authorized,
12,009.491 shares of Series B issued at September 30, 2000 and no shares
issued at December 31, 1999) 168,931 --
Warrants to purchase preferred stock 41,235 --
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share (350,000,000 shares authorized,
120,252,459 shares issued at September 30, 2000 and December 31, 1999) 1,203 1,203
Additional paid-in capital - common stock 1,154,827 1,166,530
Retained earnings 723,572 670,343
Treasury stock, at cost (10,617,529 shares at September 30, 2000 and
9,357,589 shares at December 31, 1999) (253,420) (230,035)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (46,733) (87,257)
Unearned compensation (3,445) (4,679)
-------------- --------------
Total stockholders' equity 1,786,170 1,516,105
-------------- --------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $25,232,342 $23,921,325
============== ==============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE> 4
DIME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------- -----------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INTEREST INCOME
Residential real estate loans $193,176 $178,268 $549,368 $ 568,338
Commercial real estate loans 82,569 61,507 227,494 165,182
Consumer loans 61,147 39,370 170,902 81,066
Business loans 25,540 9,028 72,414 21,082
Mortgage-backed securities 67,200 57,427 195,713 158,870
Other securities 14,339 12,658 41,028 37,575
Money market investments 212 496 661 1,272
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest income 444,183 358,754 1,257,580 1,033,385
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits 137,729 117,758 400,491 354,111
Borrowed funds 149,684 91,753 389,502 254,643
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest expense 287,413 209,511 789,993 608,754
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income 156,770 149,243 467,587 424,631
Provision for loan losses 7,000 7,000 21,000 22,500
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 149,770 142,243 446,587 402,131
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Loan servicing and production fees 73,227 67,402 211,336 199,046
Banking service fees 16,709 13,060 48,648 36,914
Securities and insurance brokerage fees 10,167 8,925 32,014 27,581
Loss upon designation for sale of mortgage-backed securities (87,441) -- (87,441) --
Net gains on sales activities 35,998 42,114 103,156 164,117
Other 3,797 2,391 11,332 7,967
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total non-interest income 52,457 133,892 319,045 435,625
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
General and administrative expense:
Compensation and employee benefits 77,237 77,521 228,685 229,195
Occupancy and equipment 27,960 25,897 83,686 76,584
Other 36,772 42,698 109,968 139,594
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total general and administrative expense 141,969 146,116 422,339 445,373
Amortization of mortgage servicing assets 32,631 27,940 92,872 93,797
Amortization of goodwill 8,329 4,230 25,046 10,603
Restructuring and other special charges 43,537 -- 97,792 --
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total non-interest expense 226,466 178,286 638,049 549,773
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(Loss) income before income tax (benefit) expense and
extraordinary items (24,239) 97,849 127,583 287,983
Income tax (benefit) expense (7,700) 36,025 44,406 106,374
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(Loss) income before extraordinary items (16,539) 61,824 83,177 181,609
Extraordinary items -- losses on early extinguishment of
debt, net of tax benefits of $3,044 -- -- -- (4,127)
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net (loss) income $(16,539) $61,824 $ 83,177 $ 177,482
========== =========== =========== ===========
PER COMMON SHARE
Basic (loss) earnings:
(Loss) income before extraordinary items $ (0.16) $ 0.55 $ 0.75 $ 1.63
Net (loss) income (0.16) 0.55 0.75 1.59
Diluted (loss) earnings:
(Loss) income before extraordinary items $ (0.16) $ 0.55 $ 0.74 $ 1.61
Net (loss) income (0.16) 0.55 0.74 1.57
Dividends declared $ 0.08 $ 0.06 $ 0.22 $ 0.17
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE> 5
DIME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------------
2000 1999
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
PREFERRED STOCK
Balance at beginning of period $ -- $ --
Issuance of Series B preferred stock 168,931 --
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period 168,931 --
-------------- -------------
WARRANTS TO PURCHASE PREFERRED STOCK
Balance at beginning of period -- --
Issuance of warrants to purchase Series C preferred stock 27,958 --
Issuance of warrants to purchase Series D preferred stock 13,277 --
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period 41,235 --
-------------- -------------
COMMON STOCK
Balance at beginning of period 1,203 1,203
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period 1,203 1,203
-------------- -------------
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL - COMMON STOCK
Balance at beginning of period 1,166,530 1,165,251
Tax benefit on stock options exercised and restricted stock 1,484 836
Issuance costs related to preferred stock and warrants to purchase preferred stock (13,187) --
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period 1,154,827 1,166,087
-------------- -------------
RETAINED EARNINGS
Balance at beginning of period 670,343 463,907
Net income 83,177 177,482
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock (961) --
Cash dividends declared on common stock (24,356) (18,975)
Net issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans (4,631) (2,540)
Issuance of treasury stock in connection with acquisition -- (4,255)
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period 723,572 615,619
-------------- -------------
TREASURY STOCK, AT COST
Balance at beginning of period (230,035) (233,965)
Purchase of treasury stock (45,061) (76,346)
Net issuance of treasury stock under employee stock plans 21,676 4,527
Issuance of treasury stock in connection with acquisition -- 73,410
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period (253,420) (232,374)
-------------- -------------
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Balance at beginning of period (87,257) (3,285)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 40,524 (67,431)
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period (46,733) (70,716)
-------------- -------------
UNEARNED COMPENSATION
Balance at beginning of period (4,679) (7,446)
Net issuance of restricted stock (15,114) (186)
Amortization of unearned compensation 16,348 2,322
-------------- -------------
Balance at end of period (3,445) (5,310)
-------------- -------------
Total stockholders' equity $1,786,170 $1,474,509
============== =============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE> 6
DIME BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------------
2000 1999
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 83,177 $ 177,482
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used) provided by
operating activities:
Provision for loan losses 21,000 22,500
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net 171,865 144,124
Provision for deferred income tax expense 31,507 86,660
Net securities losses 84,582 924
Restructuring charge 38,092 --
Losses on early extinguishment of debt -- 7,171
Net (increase) decrease in loans held for sale (629,885) 2,168,706
Other, net (257,452) (397,564)
-------------- -------------
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities (457,114) 2,210,003
-------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of securities available for sale (751,252) (1,980,138)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale 746,182 1,069,737
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale 441,117 736,087
Loans receivable originated and purchased, net of principal payments (1,192,363) (806,096)
Proceeds from sales of loans 34,794 48,998
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned 19,612 14,886
Net cash paid in acquisitions -- (923,557)
Net purchases of premises and equipment (16,042) (33,453)
-------------- -------------
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities (717,952) (1,873,536)
-------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net decrease in deposits (358,288) (870,340)
Net increase in borrowings with original maturities of three months or less 1,898,046 215,596
Proceeds from other borrowings -- 1,219,625
Repayments of other borrowings (586,873) (801,552)
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants to purchase
preferred stock 196,979 --
Proceeds from issuances of treasury stock 1,931 1,801
Purchases of treasury stock (45,061) (76,346)
Cash dividends paid (25,317) (18,975)
-------------- -------------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 1,081,417 (330,191)
-------------- -------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (93,649) 6,276
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 432,455 357,777
-------------- -------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 338,806 $ 364,053
============== =============
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest payments on deposits and borrowed funds $ 786,010 $ 617,383
Income tax payments, net 49,074 205
Supplemental non-cash investing information:
Securitization of loans receivable 272,024 491,761
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE> 7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 -- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial
statements of Dime Bancorp, Inc. (the "Holding Company") and subsidiaries
(collectively, the "Company") included herein reflect all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation
of such financial statements as of the dates, or for the periods, indicated. The
unaudited consolidated financial statements presented herein should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Holding Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999, as amended, (the "1999 10-K"). The results for the three
months and nine months ended September 30, 2000 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2000.
NOTE 2 -- HOSTILE TENDER OFFER
The hostile tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
the Holding Company's common stock (the "Common Stock") that had been formally
commenced by North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. ("North Fork") on March 15, 2000
(the "Hostile Tender Offer") expired on September 29, 2000.
In connection with the Hostile Tender Offer, the Company has recognized
total pre-tax charges of $31.8 million during the first nine months of 2000.
These charges, which are included under the caption "Restructuring and other
special charges" in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, were
comprised of $17.4 million of legal, advisory and proxy solicitation expenses
incurred in defending against the Hostile Tender Offer and $14.4 million related
to the accelerated vesting of restricted Common Stock issued under employee
stock plans, which was triggered by the Hostile Tender Offer. The Hostile Tender
Offer also triggered the accelerated vesting of Common Stock options issued
under stock-based benefit plans, although such vesting did not result in a
charge to operations.
For a discussion of various litigation by and against the Company in
connection with the Hostile Tender Offer, see Part II, Item 1, "Legal
Proceedings."
NOTE 3 -- MERGER TERMINATION
On September 15, 1999, the Holding Company had entered into a
definitive agreement and plan of merger (as subsequently amended, the "Merger
Agreement") with Hudson United Bancorp ("Hudson"), a New Jersey corporation
headquartered in Mahwah, New Jersey, and the holding company for Hudson United
Bank, a New Jersey state-chartered commercial bank. The Merger Agreement, among
other things, provided that Hudson was to merge with and into the Holding
Company (the "Merger").
On April 28, 2000, the Holding Company and Hudson announced that they
had mutually entered into an agreement to terminate the Merger Agreement (the
"Merger Termination Agreement"). Under the terms of the Merger Termination
Agreement, the Holding Company and Hudson agreed to cancel the stock options
granted to each other in connection with the Merger Agreement and to release
each other from any claims related to these arrangements. In light of the fact
that the Hostile Tender Offer was an "initial triggering event" under the stock
option the Holding Company originally issued to Hudson in connection with the
Merger Agreement (the "Stock Option"), the Holding Company, under the terms of
the Merger Termination Agreement, has agreed to pay Hudson from $50.0 million to
$92.0 million if certain events occur before October 28, 2001, including if the
Holding Company is acquired by, merges with, or sells a substantial amount of
its assets to another company (the "Subsequent Transaction Fee"). The
circumstances are parallel to those that would have allowed Hudson to exercise
the Stock Option and the amounts owed are generally less than or equal to the
amounts that would have been due under the Stock Option, which had no upper
limit. The Merger Termination Agreement also provides for a payment of $30.0
million by the Holding Company to Hudson if the Holding Company sells a
significant subsidiary before the same date (the "Subsidiary Transaction Fee").
Any Subsidiary Transaction Fee paid will be deducted from any Subsequent
Transaction Fee payment due. If none of these circumstances occurs before
October 28, 2001, the Merger Termination Agreement provides for a $15.0 million
payment by the Holding Company to Hudson.
<PAGE> 8
In connection with the termination of the Merger, the Company has
recognized pre-tax charges of $27.9 million, substantially all of which were
reflected in operations during the second quarter of 2000. These charges, which
are included under the caption "Restructuring and other special charges" in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, were comprised of the $15.0
million minimum fee to be paid by the Holding Company to Hudson pursuant to the
Merger Termination Agreement and $12.9 million of legal, advisory, integration
and other related expenses.
For a discussion of various litigation by and against the Company in
connection with the Merger, see Part II, Item 1, "Legal Proceedings."
NOTE 4 -- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Warburg, Pincus Equity Partners, L.P. Investment
On July 6, 2000, Warburg, Pincus Equity Partners, L.P. ("Warburg") and
the Holding Company entered into an agreement (the "Warburg Agreement") pursuant
to which Warburg has purchased, for approximately $238 million, several
different securities issued by the Holding Company. As further discussed below,
Warburg's investment was made over two closings.
At the first closing, which occurred on July 6, 2000, Warburg
purchased, for $210.2 million, rights (the "Rights") to 12,009.491 shares of the
Holding Company's Series B non-cumulative voting preferred stock (the "Series B
Preferred Stock"), warrants (the "Series C Preferred Stock Warrants") to
purchase 8,142.738 shares of the Holding Company's Series C non-cumulative
non-voting preferred stock (the "Series C Preferred Stock") and warrants (the
"Series D Preferred Stock Warrants") to purchase 3,866.753 shares of the Holding
Company's Series D non-cumulative non-voting preferred stock (the "Series D
Preferred Stock"). The Rights converted into shares of Series B Preferred Stock
on August 1, 2000 upon early termination of the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.
At the second closing, which occurred on October 6, 2000 following the
receipt by Warburg of a determination by the Office of Thrift Supervision (the
"OTS") that Warburg does not control the Company, Warburg purchased, for $28.0
million, 1,598.173 additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock and an
additional 1,598.173 Series D Preferred Stock Warrants. In total, after the
completion of both closings under the Warburg Agreement, Warburg owns 13,607.664
shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 8,142.738 Series C Preferred Stock Warrants
and 5,464.926 Series D Preferred Stock Warrants. The purchase price paid by
Warburg at the first and second closings was allocated to the individual
securities issued based upon their fair values.
The material terms of the securities issued or issuable to Warburg, as
well as other material provisions contained in the Warburg Agreement, are
described below.
Series B Preferred Stock. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock has a
par value and a liquidation preference of $0.01, is convertible into 1,000
shares of Common Stock, entitled to 1,000 votes on all matters on which shares
of Common Stock are entitled to vote, together with the Common Stock as a single
class, and entitled to receive the same dividends and distributions as those
paid on 1,000 shares of Common Stock, other than, as further discussed below,
the distribution of the litigation tracking warrants (the "Litigation Tracking
Warrants") that the Holding Company has proposed to distribute to holders of
Common Stock (the "Common Stockholders"). Shares of Series B Preferred Stock
will convert into shares of Common Stock on the earliest of: (i) the issuance of
the Litigation Tracking Warrants; (ii) a change in control of the Holding
Company; (iii) lapsing of the transfer restrictions placed on the Series B
Preferred Stock under certain provisions of the Warburg Agreement; or (iv) April
6, 2001. Series B Preferred Stock has preference over Common Stock with respect
to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets in the event of a
liquidation or dissolution of the Holding Company.
Series C Preferred Stock. After issuance, shares of Series C Preferred
Stock will not be entitled to vote, except as required by law. Each share of
Series C Preferred Stock will have a par value and a liquidation preference of
$0.01 and will be entitled to receive the same dividends and distributions,
other than the distribution of the Litigation Tracking Warrants, as those paid
on 1,000 shares of Common Stock. Upon the receipt of (1) written
<PAGE> 9
advice of counsel that, under applicable federal banking laws, the shares of
Series C Preferred Stock may be converted or (2) a certificate that Warburg is
transferring the shares pursuant to a widely dispersed sale, each share of
Series C Preferred Stock will be convertible into 1,000 shares of Common Stock,
unless the Series B Preferred Stock has not yet converted into Common Stock, in
which case each share of Series C Preferred Stock will be convertible only into
one share of Series B Preferred Stock. Series C Preferred Stock will have
preference over Common Stock with respect to the payment of dividends and the
distribution of assets in the event of a liquidation or dissolution of the
Holding Company.
Series D Preferred Stock. After issuance, shares of Series D Preferred
Stock will not be entitled to vote, except as required by law. Each share of
Series D Preferred Stock will have a par value and a liquidation preference of
$0.01 and will be entitled to receive the same dividends and distributions,
other than the distribution of the Litigation Tracking Warrants, as those paid
on 1,000 shares of Common Stock. Series D Preferred Stock will not be
convertible into any other class of stock of the Holding Company unless the
Holding Company receives stockholder approval of the issuance under the rules of
the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). Pursuant to the Warburg Agreement, the
Holding Company agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain this
approval prior to September 30, 2002. Upon such approval, each share of Series D
Preferred Stock will convert into one share of Series C Preferred Stock. Series
D Preferred Stock will have preference over Common Stock with respect to the
payment of dividends and the distribution of assets in the event of a
liquidation or dissolution of the Holding Company.
Warrants. The Series C Preferred Stock Warrants and the Series D
Preferred Stock Warrants (collectively, the "Warrants") allow Warburg to
purchase shares of the Series C Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred
Stock, respectively, at an exercise price of $21.50 per underlying share of
Common Stock, subject to a number of antidilution and other adjustments. The
Warrants expire seven years after issuance, have a surrender right on a change
in control of the Holding Company that entitles Warburg to a payment upon
surrender even if there is a change in control at less than $21.50 per share,
and do not possess any voting rights.
When it is permissible for the Holding Company to do so under the
federal banking laws and regulations or in the event that Warburg intends to
transfer the Series C Preferred Stock Warrants in a widely dispersed sale, the
Series C Preferred Stock Warrants will be exchanged for warrants to acquire
Series B Preferred Stock if the Series B Preferred Stock has not yet converted
into shares of Common Stock. Otherwise, the Series C Preferred Stock Warrants
will be exchanged for warrants to purchase Common Stock. The Series D Preferred
Stock Warrants will be exchanged for Series C Preferred Stock Warrants upon the
requisite stockholder approval under NYSE rules.
The Holding Company has a right of first offer on any sale of the
Warrants by Warburg. Warburg also has the right to sell, or surrender, any of
the Warrants back to the Holding Company (pursuant to an agreed valuation
methodology) upon the occurrence of certain change in control events regarding
the Holding Company and has the right to sell, or surrender, any of the Series D
Preferred Stock Warrants back to the Holding Company (pursuant to an agreed
valuation methodology) if the appropriate stockholder approval under NYSE rules
is not obtained by September 30, 2003 or the other transfer restrictions on the
Series D Preferred Stock Warrants lapse before then.
In addition to customary antidilution provisions for the Warrants, the
Holding Company has agreed to additional antidilution protections in two
circumstances. First, although the various series of stock that Warburg may
acquire upon exercise of the Warrants do not have the right to receive the
Litigation Tracking Warrants, the exercise price of the Warrants may be adjusted
if the average aggregate market price of the Litigation Tracking Warrants is
over $100 million in the 20-day period beginning ten days after their issuance.
In this case, the exercise price of the Warrants will be adjusted downward for
the aggregate market price over $100 million, but only in proportion to
Warburg's ownership of the Holding Company. Second, the exercise price of the
Warrants may be adjusted downward, in proportion to Warburg's ownership of the
Holding Company, for any payment made by the Holding Company to Hudson in excess
of $15.0 million under the Merger Termination Agreement, unless the payment
relates to: (i) a breach of representations by Warburg regarding its ownership
of the Holding Company; or (ii) another subsequent transaction, such as a merger
or tender offer, approved or recommended by the Holding Company's Board of
Directors (the "Board").
Standstill Agreement. Until July 6, 2003, Warburg has agreed that it
will not purchase or acquire any shares of Common Stock that would result in its
having control over the Holding Company or owning in excess of 24.9%
<PAGE> 10
of the Holding Company's outstanding voting stock. In addition, Warburg has
agreed that it will not take any action that would violate its agreement with
the OTS to refrain from controlling the Holding Company.
Preemptive Rights. As long as Warburg owns at least 5% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock (assuming the exercise of all outstanding
options and warrants and conversion of convertible preferred stock), if the
Holding Company issues any shares of Common Stock (other than under the
Company's stock-based benefit plans), Warburg has the right to purchase from the
Holding Company that amount of shares of Common Stock required for it to
maintain its proportionate interest in the Holding Company. To the extent
Warburg utilizes this right to maintain its percentage ownership interest, it
will not be entitled to duplicative protection of antidilution adjustments under
the terms of the Warrants.
Transfer Restrictions. With certain exceptions, shares of the Holding
Company's stock and warrants to acquire such stock owned by Warburg will be
restricted from transfer subject to, among other things, a schedule whereby 20%
of the shares will be freely tradeable after July 6, 2001; an additional 30%
will be freely tradeable after July 6, 2002; and the balance will be freely
tradeable after July 6, 2003. In addition, Warburg will be permitted to tender
into tender or exchange offers (1) on a pro rata basis with other stockholders
of the Holding Company, provided at least 60% of the shares sought in the tender
or exchange offer have been tendered by the Holding Company's other stockholders
or (2) not opposed by the Board.
Warburg will be released from the transfer restrictions if, among other
things, the Holding Company breaches its material obligations in the Warburg
Agreement or the Holding Company executes documentation, or recommends an offer
to its stockholders, that would result in a change in control of the Holding
Company.
Amendments to the Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement
On July 6, 2000, the Holding Company amended the Stockholder Protection
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 20, 1995, as amended, between the Holding
Company and The Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB (the "Bank"), as successor to
The First National Bank of Boston, as rights agent (the "Rights Agreement"), in
three respects. First, the Rights Agreement will not apply to a Common Stock
tender offer that has at least a 50% cash component and sufficient liquidity in
any securities component, provided that the tendering shares represent at least
75% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Second, a provision has been
added to the Rights Agreement so that it will terminate immediately following
the Holding Company's 2002 annual meeting of stockholders (the "2002 Annual
Meeting"). Third, the Warburg investment was exempted from triggering the rights
issued under the Rights Agreement.
Common Stock Repurchase Programs
On October 6, 2000, the Holding Company announced a program to
repurchase up to 13,607,644 shares of Common Stock. No time limit has been set
for completion of this program. This program replaced the previously announced
dutch auction tender offer (the "Dutch Auction Tender Offer"), which the Holding
Company had commenced on August 1, 2000 and which was terminated on October 6,
2000. No shares of Common Stock were purchased under the Dutch Auction Tender
Offer.
Proposed Issuance of the Litigation Tracking Warrants
On July 6, 2000, the Holding Company announced its intention to issue
the Litigation Tracking Warrants to Common Stockholders. The Litigation Tracking
Warrants will represent the right to receive, upon their exercise, Common Stock
equal in value to 85% of the net after-tax proceeds, if any, from the Company's
pending goodwill lawsuit against the United States government.
<PAGE> 11
NOTE 5 -- BALANCE SHEET REPOSITIONING AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGE
Balance Sheet Repositioning
During the third quarter of 2000, the Company implemented a plan to
sell $1.8 billion of mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") held in its securities
available for sale portfolio (the "MBS Sales Initiative"). Upon implementation
of the MBS Sales Initiative, an other than temporary impairment in value loss of
$87.4 million was recognized on the MBS to be sold. Sales (including certain
sales settling in October 2000) of approximately $0.7 billion of the MBS
designated for sale were consummated during the 2000 third quarter. The Company
currently anticipates that the MBS Sales Initiative will be largely completed by
year-end 2000 and fully completed by the end of the first quarter of 2001.
Substantially all of the proceeds from the MBS Sales Initiative are currently
expected to be used initially to reduce borrowed funds.
Restructuring Charge
During the third quarter of 2000, the Company implemented a series of
actions intended to reduce annual expenses by approximately $50 million (the
"Expense Reduction Initiative"). It is currently anticipated that these expense
reductions will be substantially in effect by the end of the first quarter of
2001. As part of the Expense Reduction Initiative, the Company is reducing its
employee complement, consolidating selected operational functions and
consolidating or disposing of certain facilities. In connection therewith, the
Company recorded a restructuring charge of $38.1 million (the "Restructuring
Charge") during the third quarter of 2000. In recognizing this charge, the
Company established a restructuring liability of $26.5 million, of which $16.4
million was associated with personnel-related costs and $10.1 million with
facilities, and recognized impairment of premises and equipment and goodwill of
$10.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively. After cash payments for
personnel-related costs, the balance of the restructuring liability at September
30, 2000 was $25.8 million.
The personnel-related costs included in the restructuring liability are
associated with the termination of approximately 300 positions, substantially
all of which are expected to occur prior to the end of 2000. Approximately 60%
of these positions are at the Bank, with an emphasis on management and staff
positions in support units. The remaining positions to be eliminated will occur
at the Bank's mortgage banking subsidiary. These reductions are associated with
management and staff positions in the areas of administration, loan servicing
and loan production.
The facilities-related costs reflected in the restructuring liability
represent the net present value of lease payments (net of expected sublease
rentals) to be made for facilities that will no longer be utilized by the
Company. These costs are primarily associated with a reduction in space at the
Company's administrative headquarters in Uniondale, New York and the closing of
various mortgage banking offices in selected regions across the country. The
underlying leases expire at various dates from 2001 through 2007.
NOTE 6 -- (LOSS) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Effective with the issuance of the convertible Series B Preferred Stock
during the third quarter of 2000, basic (loss) earnings per common share is
computed after consideration of dividend requirements on such stock. For the
third quarter of 2000, the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock was not
assumed for purposes of computing weighted average diluted common shares
outstanding because of antidilution. Accordingly, the dividend requirements on
the Series B Preferred Stock were also considered in the determination of the
numerator used to compute the diluted loss per common share for the third
quarter of 2000.
<PAGE> 12
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted
(loss) earnings per common share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except
per share data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------- -----------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Loss) income before extraordinary items $(16,539) $ 61,824 $83,177 $181,609
Preferred stock dividends (961) -- (961) --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(Loss) income before extraordinary items applicable to
common stockholders (17,500) 61,824 82,216 181,609
Extraordinary items -- -- -- (4,127)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net (loss) income applicable to common stockholders $(17,500) $ 61,824 $82,216 $177,482
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding 109,323 112,046 110,048 111,664
Effects of dilutive securities:
Common Stock options and restricted Common Stock -- 1,081 611 1,273
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding 109,323 113,127 110,659 112,937
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
(Loss) income before extraordinary items $ (0.16) $ 0.55 $ 0.75 $ 1.63
Extraordinary items -- -- -- (0.04)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net (loss) income $ (0.16) $ 0.55 $ 0.75 $ 1.59
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
(Loss) income before extraordinary items $ (0.16) $ 0.55 $ 0.74 $ 1.61
Extraordinary items -- -- -- (0.04)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net (loss) income $ (0.16) $ 0.55 $ 0.74 $ 1.57
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
For the third quarter of 2000, there were no Common Stock equivalents
included in weighted average diluted common shares outstanding because of the
net loss incurred by the Company for that period. At September 30, 2000, the
Company's potential Common Stock equivalents were limited to: (i) options to
purchase 9,002,513 shares of Common Stock at exercise prices between $1.13 and
$31.06 and a weighted average exercise price of $18.27; (ii) 236,000 shares of
restricted Common Stock that were purchased for $0.01 per share; (iii) rights to
purchase 418,028 shares of Common Stock at $15.75 per share under the Company's
Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (iv) 12,009.491 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock; and (v) warrants to purchase 8,142.738 shares of Series C Preferred Stock
at an exercise price of $21.50 per underlying share of Common Stock.
As discussed in Note 4, Warburg purchased an additional 1,598.173
shares of Series B Preferred Stock on October 6, 2000.
NOTE 7 -- COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table sets forth the Company's comprehensive income for
the periods indicated (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------- -----------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
---------- --------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net (loss) income $(16,539) $61,824 $83,177 $177,482
Other comprehensive income (loss) 53,518 (22,074) 40,524 (67,431)
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Comprehensive income $36,979 $39,750 $123,701 $110,051
========== ========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 13
NOTE 8 -- RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB")
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133, as amended in
July 1999 and June 2000, establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts, and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires that an
entity recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in
statements of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value.
Changes in the fair values of those derivatives will be reported in results of
operations or other comprehensive income or loss depending on the use of the
derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The key criterion for
hedge accounting is that the hedging relationship must be highly effective in
achieving offsetting changes in those fair values or cash flows that are
attributable to the hedged risk, both at inception of the hedge and on an
ongoing basis.
Under SFAS No. 133, an entity that elects to apply hedge accounting is
required to establish, at the inception of the hedge, the method it will use for
assessing the effectiveness of the hedging derivative and the measurement
approach for determining the ineffective aspect of the hedge (the amount by
which hedge gains or losses do not perfectly offset corresponding losses or
gains on the hedged item). Upon implementation, hedging relationships must be
designated anew and documented pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 133. For
fair value hedge transactions in which the Company is hedging changes in the
fair value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments, changes in the fair
values of the derivative instruments will generally be offset in the Company's
results of operations by changes in the fair values of the items being hedged.
For cash flow hedge transactions in which the Company is hedging the variability
of cash flows related to a variable rate asset, liability or forecasted
transaction, changes in the fair values of the derivative instruments will be
reported in other comprehensive income or loss. The gains and losses on
derivative instruments that are reported in other comprehensive income or loss
will be reflected in the results of operations in the periods in which the
results of operations are impacted by the variability of the cash flows of the
hedged items. The ineffective portion of all hedges will be recognized in
current period results of operations. To assist companies in understanding and
implementing this complex accounting standard, the FASB established the
Derivatives Implementation Group ( the "DIG"), which has played an active role
in addressing key implementation and interpretation issues, some of which remain
outstanding at the time of this filing.
The Company currently utilizes a variety of derivative financial
instruments to assist in managing its interest rate risk exposures. This
includes hedging securities available for sale, loans receivable, short-term
borrowings and certain time deposits. In addition, in connection with its
mortgage-banking activities, the Company hedges its loans held for sale, the
related committed mortgage loan pipeline and its mortgage servicing assets. The
Company is currently reassessing the interest rate risk tools to be utilized
after December 31, 2000 in light of its adoption of SFAS No. 133.
The Company intends to adopt SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001. The
impact on the Company of the initial adoption of the standard will result in a
one time adjustment, to be reflected as a cumulative effect of an accounting
change, and is dependent on numerous factors including the nature and purpose of
the derivatives in place at the time of adoption and their fair values as of
January 1, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 may cause volatility in the
Company's results of operations, statement of comprehensive income and
stockholders' equity. An accurate assessment of the Company's hedge
effectiveness, and hence, the net impact of adopting SFAS No. 133, will not be
possible until the FASB and the DIG, which are currently interpreting certain
provisions of SFAS No. 133, conclude their deliberations.
In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities -
a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125." SFAS No. 140 revises the standards for
accounting for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and
collateral and requires certain additional disclosures. The collateral
provisions and disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 140 are effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2000, whereas the other provisions of SFAS No.
140 are to be applied prospectively to transfers and servicing of financial
assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001. The
adoption of SFAS No. 140 is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company's financial condition or results of operations.
<PAGE> 14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are
forward-looking and may be identified by the use of words such as "believe,"
"expect," "anticipate," "should," "planned," "estimated," "may," "will,"
"intend" and "potential" and other similar expressions. These forward-looking
statements are based on the current expectations of the Company. A variety of
factors could cause the Company's actual results and experience to differ
materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in such
forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the
operations, performance, development and results of the Company's business
include interest rate movements, competition from both financial and
non-financial institutions, changes in applicable laws and regulations, the
timing and occurrence (or non-occurrence) of transactions and events that may be
subject to circumstances beyond the Company's control and general economic
conditions.
STRATEGIC ACTIONS
As a result of its review of strategic alternatives commenced in May
2000 after the termination of the Merger Agreement, the Holding Company entered
into the Warburg Agreement on July 6, 2000. In connection therewith, Warburg has
purchased Series B Preferred Stock (representing approximately 13.6 million
shares of Common Stock) and the Warrants for approximately $238 million. The
Warburg Agreement is described more fully in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements and in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Holding
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on July
11, 2000, as amended on October 12, 2000.
On July 6, 2000, the Holding Company also announced a series of actions
intended to improve returns and provide enhanced value to its stockholders,
including:
-- The appointment of Anthony P. Terracciano as Chairman of the
Board;
-- The planned distribution to the Holding Company's stockholders
(excluding Warburg) of the Litigation Tracking Warrants, which
represent the right to receive, upon exercise, Common Stock
equal in value to 85% of the net after-tax proceeds, if any,
from the Company's pending goodwill lawsuit against the United
States government;
-- The adoption of certain amendments to the Rights Agreement,
including providing an immediate exception for certain
qualifying tender offers and eliminating the agreement in its
entirety effective immediately after the 2002 Annual Meeting;
and
-- Reviewing potential opportunities to continue to improve the
Company's growth rate and quality of its earnings through
initiatives such as: (i) further investments in technology and
higher-margin businesses, including development of more
comprehensive e-commerce offerings and expansion of business
banking; (ii) balance sheet repositioning, including the sale
of a substantial portion of its securities portfolio; and
(iii) expense reduction.
On September 15, 2000, the Company announced the MBS Sales Initiative
and the Expense Reduction Initiative. Under the MBS Sales Initiative, the
Company plans to sell $1.8 billion of MBS held in its securities available for
sale portfolio on the date of the announcement. The Expense Reduction Initiative
is intended to reduce annual expenses by approximately $50 million, and it is
currently anticipated that these expense reductions will be substantially in
effect by the end of the first quarter of 2001. The primary components of the
Expense Reduction Initiative are the elimination of a total of 400 management
and staff positions, including through attrition, the consolidation of selected
operational functions and the consolidation or disposal of certain facilities.
For a further discussion of the MBS Sales Initiative and the Expense Reduction
Initiative, see Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
On October 6, 2000, the Company announced a new Common Stock repurchase
program (replacing the previously announced Dutch Auction Tender Offer)
authorizing the purchase of up to approximately 13.6 million
<PAGE> 15
shares of Common Stock. On October 20, 2000, the Holding Company announced that
its cash dividend per share of Common Stock was increased 25.0% to $0.10 for the
fourth quarter of 2000 from $0.08 in the third quarter of 2000. This followed an
increase of approximately 33% in the second quarter of 2000 from the first
quarter of 2000.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
The table set forth below presents selected consolidated financial
information of the Company for the three- and nine-month periods ended September
30, 2000 and 1999 on a reported basis, as well as on an operating earnings basis
and a cash operating earnings basis. Operating earnings represent reported
results of operations adjusted for the effects of certain non-recurring or
unusual items. Cash operating earnings represent operating earnings excluding
the after-tax impact of amortization of goodwill. The Company believes that
operating earnings and cash operating earnings basis information, when taken in
conjunction with reported results, provide useful information in evaluating
performance on a comparable basis, although neither operating earnings nor cash
operating earnings is currently a required basis for reporting financial results
under generally accepted accounting principles.
In arriving at operating earnings for the 2000 periods, reported
results were adjusted to exclude the effects of: (i) the $38.1 million
Restructuring Charge incurred during the 2000 third quarter in connection with
the Expense Reduction Initiative; (ii) other special charges of $5.4 million for
the 2000 third quarter and $59.7 million for the first nine months of 2000
recognized in connection with the Hostile Tender Offer and the termination of
the Merger; and (iii) a charge of $87.4 million associated with the designation
for sale of MBS in connection with the MBS Sales Initiative. On an after-tax
basis, these charges totaled $85.9 million and $118.1 million for the three- and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2000, respectively. For the third quarter
of 1999, operating earnings were the same as reported net income, as there were
no adjustments during that quarter. In arriving at operating earnings for the
first nine months of 1999, net income was adjusted to exclude after-tax
extraordinary losses on the early extinguishment of debt of $4.1 million ($7.2
million on a pre-tax basis).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------- -------------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Reported Basis:
Net (loss) income $(16,539) $61,824 $ 83,177 $177,482
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share (0.16) 0.55 0.74 1.57
Return on average assets NM % 1.13 % 0.46 % 1.10 %
Return on average total stockholders' equity NM 16.75 7.14 16.39
Return on average common stockholders' equity NM 16.75 6.91 16.39
Operating Earnings Basis:
Operating earnings $ 69,381 $61,824 $201,270 $181,609
Diluted operating earnings per common share 0.59 0.55 1.77 1.61
Return on average assets 1.10 % 1.13 % 1.10 % 1.12 %
Return on average common stockholders' equity 17.64 16.75 17.27 16.77
Return on average total stockholders' equity 16.09 16.75 16.73 16.77
Cash Operating Earnings Basis:
Cash operating earnings $ 75,457 $65,744 $220,166 $191,681
Diluted cash operating earnings per common share 0.64 0.58 1.94 1.70
Return on average tangible assets 1.22 % 1.22 % 1.23 % 1.20 %
Return on average tangible common stockholders' equity 28.52 22.47 28.47 21.63
Return on average tangible total stockholders' equity 24.96 22.47 27.13 21.63
-----------
NM - Not meaningful.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 16
The Company achieved growth in operating earnings of $7.6 million, or
12.2%, for the third quarter of 2000 and $19.7 million, or 10.8%, for the first
nine months of 2000, as compared with the corresponding periods of 1999. Diluted
operating earnings per common share increased $0.04, or 7.3%, for the third
quarter of 2000 from the third quarter of 1999 and $0.16, or 9.9%, for the first
nine months of 2000 from the same period one year ago. The increases in
operating earnings primarily resulted from higher levels of net interest income
and fee income, coupled with reductions in general and administrative expense.
The effects of these factors were partially offset by lower net gains on sales
activities, largely associated with the Company's mortgage banking activities,
higher goodwill amortization, and with respect to the third quarter of 2000 as
compared with the third quarter of 1999, a higher level of amortization of
mortgage servicing assets. Contributing to the improvements in operating
earnings were the effects of internal factors and acquisitions consummated
during 1999 (the "1999 Acquisitions"), the most significant of which were the
acquisition in October 1999 of KeyBank National Association's Long Island
banking franchise, which included 28 branches, the acquisition in August 1999 of
Citibank N.A.'s indirect automobile finance business and the acquisition in May
1999 of Lakeview Financial Corp., the then holding company for Lakeview Savings
Bank, which operated 11 branches in northern New Jersey.
Operating earnings rose $2.8 million for the third quarter of 2000 from
the immediately preceding quarter. Diluted operating earnings per common share
for the third quarter of 2000 declined $0.01 from $0.60 for the second quarter
of 2000 due to an increase in weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
used to compute diluted operating earnings per common share to 118.4 million
shares for the 2000 third quarter from 111.4 million shares for the 2000 second
quarter. This increase in shares, which is expected to be temporary, was
substantially a result of the Series B Preferred Stock issued to Warburg during
the 2000 third quarter. Excluding the effect on weighted average diluted shares
outstanding of the Series B Preferred Stock issued to Warburg during the 2000
third quarter, as well as the beneficial impact on the Company's net interest
income of the use of the related proceeds, diluted operating earnings per common
share were $0.61 for the third quarter of 2000. As previously discussed, the
Company, on October 6, 2000, announced a program to repurchase up to
approximately 13.6 million shares of Common Stock. This program is intended to
ultimately offset the impact on weighted average diluted common shares
outstanding of the issuance of Series B Preferred Stock in connection with the
Warburg Agreement during both the third and fourth quarters of 2000.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis amounted to $157.4
million for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, up $8.1 million, or 5.5%, from
the comparable quarter of 1999. For the first nine months of 2000, net interest
income on a taxable-equivalent basis was $469.3 million, an increase of $44.5
million, or 10.5%, from the same period one year ago. These increases were
driven by growth in average interest-earning assets of $2.9 billion, or 14.7%,
for the third quarter of 2000 and $2.4 billion, or 12.2%, for the first nine
months of 2000, as compared with the corresponding year ago periods. Net
interest income levels for the 2000 periods, as compared with the 1999 periods,
were unfavorably affected by compression in the net interest margin. The Company
experienced a reduction in its net interest margin to 2.84% for the third
quarter of 2000 from 3.07% for the third quarter of 1999, primarily due to an
increase in the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities, which outpaced
growth in the yield on average interest-earning assets. The net interest margin
decreased to 2.89% for the first nine months of 2000 from 2.92% for the first
nine months of 1999. This decline was largely the result of an increase in the
excess of average interest-bearing liabilities over average interest-earning
assets, which more than offset the effects of a higher interest rate spread.
The yields on average interest-earning assets for the third quarter and
first nine months of 2000 increased to 7.85% and 7.68%, respectively, from 7.26%
and 7.07% for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999,
respectively. Contributing significantly to the higher yields were the effects
of the Company's continuing strategy to increase the aggregate percentage of its
commercial real estate, consumer and business loans (which generally have higher
yields than the Company's residential real estate loans) to total loans
receivable. The aggregate average balance of commercial real estate, consumer
and business loans rose $2.5 billion, or 45.6%, for the third quarter of 2000
and $3.0 billion, or 64.8%, for the first nine months of 2000, as compared with
the corresponding periods one year ago, reflecting internal growth and the
effects of the 1999 Acquisitions. Such loans represented 49.4% and 47.9% of
total average loans receivable for the third quarter and first nine months of
2000, respectively, up from 40.0% and 35.1% for the third quarter and first nine
months of 1999, respectively. The higher
<PAGE> 17
yields on average interest-earning assets for the 2000 periods were also
reflective of the rising interest rate environment.
The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities rose to 4.93% for the
third quarter of 2000 from 4.14% for the same quarter of 1999 and to 4.69% for
the first nine months of 2000 from 4.11% for the comparable year ago period.
These increases were primarily attributable to sharply higher borrowing costs,
but also reflect higher deposit costs and the Company's greater reliance on
borrowed funds. The Company's cost of average borrowed funds rose 110 basis
points for the third quarter of 2000 and 101 basis points for the first nine
months of 2000, as compared with the corresponding periods of 1999. The
percentage of average borrowed funds to total average interest-bearing
liabilities increased to 39.0% for the third quarter of 2000 from 33.2% for the
comparable 1999 quarter and to 36.5% for the first nine months of 2000 from
32.4% for the same period of 1999. The cost of average deposits rose 39 basis
points for the third quarter of 2000 and 22 basis points for the first nine
months of 2000, as compared with the same periods one year ago. The increases in
the cost of average deposits were somewhat limited by growth in the percentage
of core deposits (which consist of demand, savings and money market deposits and
are generally less costly than the Company's time deposits as well as its
borrowed funds) to total deposits. Core deposits represented 54.8% of average
total deposits for the third quarter of 2000, as compared with 53.3% for the
third quarter of 1999, and 54.3% for the first nine months of 2000, as compared
with 52.2% for the first nine months of 1999. The average balance of core
deposits increased to $7.7 billion for each of the 2000 periods from $7.1
billion for the third quarter of 1999 and $7.0 billion for the first nine months
of 1999.
<PAGE> 18
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the
Company's consolidated average statement of financial condition, net interest
income, interest rate spread and net interest margin. Average balances are
computed on a daily basis. Non-accrual loans are included in average balances in
the table below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
AVERAGE AVERAGE
AVERAGE INTEREST YIELD/ AVERAGE INTEREST YIELD/
BALANCE (1) COST (1) BALANCE (1) COST (1)
----------- ---------- -------- ------------- --------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans:
Loans held for sale $ 2,176,925 $ 46,956 8.60 % $ 1,993,022 $ 36,317 7.25 %
Loans receivable:
Residential real estate 8,075,310 146,220 7.24 8,139,999 141,951 6.98
Commercial real estate 3,911,865 82,569 8.43 3,091,855 61,507 7.95
Consumer 2,873,719 61,147 8.49 1,883,661 39,370 8.33
Business 1,108,100 25,540 9.16 446,755 9,028 8.03
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Total loans receivable 15,968,994 315,476 7.89 13,562,270 251,856 7.42
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Total loans 18,145,919 362,432 7.98 15,555,292 288,173 7.40
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Securities:
MBS 3,666,698 67,200 7.33 3,445,553 57,427 6.67
Other 799,670 15,017 7.50 694,508 12,720 7.30
------------- --------- ------------- --------
Total securities 4,466,368 82,217 7.36 4,140,061 70,147 6.77
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Money market investments 13,542 212 6.23 37,321 496 5.27
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Total interest-earning assets 22,625,829 444,861 7.85 19,732,674 358,816 7.26
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Other assets 2,565,758 2,081,486
------------- -------------
Total assets $25,191,587 $21,814,160
============= =============
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Core:
Demand $ 2,198,487 $ 1,898 0.34 % $ 1,861,922 1,747 0.37 %
Savings 2,323,481 12,637 2.16 2,434,130 14,021 2.29
Money market 3,166,359 35,179 4.42 2,808,704 26,706 3.77
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Total core 7,688,327 49,714 2.57 7,104,756 42,474 2.37
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Time 6,345,445 88,015 5.52 6,221,741 75,284 4.80
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Total deposits 14,033,772 137,729 3.90 13,326,497 117,758 3.51
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Borrowed funds:
Federal funds purchased and
securities sold under
agreements to repurchase 3,900,374 65,463 6.57 3,065,805 40,552 5.18
Other short-term borrowings 3,810,397 61,872 6.35 2,262,137 30,380 5.26
Other 1,259,018 22,349 7.02 1,290,524 20,821 6.38
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Total borrowed funds 8,969,789 149,684 6.54 6,618,466 91,753 5.44
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Total interest-bearing liabilitie 23,003,561 287,413 4.93 19,944,963 209,511 4.14
------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Other liabilities 463,419 392,605
Stockholders' equity 1,724,607 1,476,592
------------- -------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $25,191,587 $21,814,160
============= =============
Net interest income $157,448 $149,305
========= =========
Interest rate spread 2.92 % 3.12 %
Net interest margin 2.84 3.07
</TABLE>
-----------
(1) Interest income and yields are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis,
assuming a federal income tax rate of 35% and applicable state and local
income tax rates.
<PAGE> 19
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
-------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
AVERAGE AVERAGE
AVERAGE INTEREST YIELD/ AVERAGE INTEREST YIELD/
BALANCE (1) COST (1) BALANCE (1) COST (1)
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans:
Loans held for sale $ 1,760,650 $ 110,552 8.38 % $ 2,593,808 $ 134,229 6.91 %
Loans receivable:
Residential real estate 8,163,238 438,816 7.17 8,426,627 434,109 6.87
Commercial real estate 3,715,539 227,494 8.17 2,853,657 165,182 7.72
Consumer 2,707,831 170,902 8.42 1,348,071 81,066 8.03
Business 1,087,189 72,414 8.88 355,692 21,082 7.92
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total loans receivable 15,673,797 909,626 7.74 12,984,047 701,439 7.20
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total loans 17,434,447 1,020,178 7.80 15,577,855 835,668 7.16
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Securities:
MBS 3,638,537 195,713 7.17 3,181,643 158,870 6.66
Other 772,198 42,709 7.38 694,619 37,760 7.26
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total securities 4,410,735 238,422 7.21 3,876,262 196,630 6.77
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Money market investments 15,586 661 5.66 31,846 1,272 5.33
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total interest-earning assets 21,860,768 1,259,261 7.68 19,485,963 1,033,570 7.07
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Other assets 2,512,257 2,059,849
----------- -----------
Total assets $24,373,025 $21,545,812
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Core:
Demand $ 2,128,466 $ 5,576 0.35 % $ 1,835,525 5,422 0.39 %
Savings 2,348,853 38,059 2.16 2,334,055 38,199 2.19
Money market 3,218,565 101,031 4.19 2,786,212 77,855 3.74
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total core 7,695,884 144,666 2.51 6,955,792 121,476 2.33
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Time 6,478,120 255,825 5.28 6,366,519 232,635 4.89
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total deposits 14,174,004 400,491 3.77 13,322,311 354,111 3.55
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Borrowed funds:
Federal funds purchased and
securities sold under agreements
to repurchase 3,547,070 168,483 6.24 3,100,355 116,507 4.96
Other short-term borrowings 3,319,496 153,695 6.08 2,216,090 86,100 5.12
Other 1,293,838 67,324 6.89 1,061,273 52,036 6.50
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total borrowed funds 8,160,404 389,502 6.28 6,377,718 254,643 5.27
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities 22,334,408 789,993 4.69 19,700,029 608,754 4.11
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Other liabilities 434,209 401,863
Stockholders' equity 1,604,408 1,443,920
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $24,373,025 $21,545,812
=========== ===========
Net interest income $ 469,268 $ 424,816
========== ==========
Interest rate spread 2.99 % 2.96 %
Net interest margin 2.89 2.92
</TABLE>
-----------
(1) Interest income and yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis,
assuming a federal income tax rate of 35% and applicable state and local
income taxes.
<PAGE> 20
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the changes
in interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and interest expense and the
amounts attributable to changes in average balances (volume) and average
interest rates (rate). The changes in interest income and interest expense
attributable to changes in both volume and rate have been allocated
proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 VERSUS 1999 SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 VERSUS 1999
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) INCREASE (DECREASE)
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
DUE TO DUE TO DUE TO DUE TO
VOLUME RATE TOTAL VOLUME RATE TOTAL
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Total loans $50,546 $ 23,713 $74,259 $104,729 $79,781 $184,510
Total securities 5,757 6,313 12,070 28,317 13,475 41,792
Money market investments (360) 76 (284) (685) 74 (611)
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest income 55,943 30,102 86,045 132,361 93,330 225,691
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Interest expense:
Total deposits 6,474 13,497 19,971 23,357 23,023 46,380
Total borrowed funds 36,817 21,114 57,931 79,364 55,495 134,859
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest expense 43,291 34,611 77,902 102,721 78,518 181,239
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income $12,652 $(4,509) $ 8,143 $ 29,640 $14,812 $ 44,452
============ =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses, which is predicated upon the Company's
assessment of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses (see "Management of
Credit Risk"), amounted to $7.0 million for the third quarter of 2000, unchanged
from the 1999 third quarter, and $21.0 million for the first nine months of
2000, down from $22.5 million for the first nine months of 1999. Net loan
charge-offs were $3.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, as
compared with $3.6 million for the third quarter of 1999, and $14.6 million for
the first nine months of 2000, as compared with $7.8 million for the first nine
months of 1999.
Non-Interest Income
General. Non-interest income on a reported basis was $52.5 million for
the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and $319.0 million for the first nine
months of 2000. Non-interest income on an operating earnings basis for the third
quarter and first nine months of 2000 (which excludes the loss of $87.4 million
associated with the MBS Sales Initiative) was $139.9 million and $406.5 million,
respectively. In comparison, non-interest income was $133.9 million for the
third quarter of 1999 and $435.6 million for the first nine months of 1999.
(There were no operating earnings adjustments associated with non-interest
income during the 1999 periods.) On an operating earnings basis, the changes in
the 2000 periods, as compared with the 1999 periods, reflect the net effect of
growth in fee income and lower net gains on sales activities. On an operating
earnings basis, non-interest income represented 47.2% of total revenue (net
interest income plus non-interest income) for the third quarter of 2000, as
compared with 47.3% for the third quarter of 1999, and 46.5% for the first nine
months of 2000, as compared with 50.6% for the first nine months of 1999.
Loan Servicing and Production Fees. Loan servicing and production fees
amounted to $73.2 million for the third quarter of 2000, an increase of $5.8
million, or 8.6%, from the corresponding quarter of 1999. For the first nine
months of 2000, loan servicing and production fees were $211.3 million, up $12.3
million, or 6.2%, from the same period one year ago.
Loan servicing fees rose to $54.3 million and $162.0 million for the
third quarter and first nine months of 2000, respectively, from $48.6 million
and $136.8 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 1999,
respectively. These increases were largely attributable to growth in the average
balances of the loan servicing portfolio. At September 30, 2000, the Company's
portfolio of mortgage loans serviced for others (excluding loans being
subserviced by the Company) amounted to $39.8 billion, up $2.7 billion from
December 31, 1999 and $3.3 billion from one year earlier. This portfolio
consists substantially of residential real estate loans, the underlying
<PAGE> 21
weighted average coupon rates of which were 7.37%, 7.25% and 7.20% at September
30, 2000, December 31, 1999 and September 30, 1999, respectively. Loans
subserviced by the Company totaled $2.8 billion at September 30, 2000, as
compared with $1.3 billion at December 31, 1999 and $4.2 billion at September
30, 1999.
Pursuant to an agreement with PNC Mortgage Corp. of America ("PNC
Mortgage"), the Company (subject to the limitation set forth below) sells to PNC
Mortgage the servicing rights to substantially all conforming conventional
fixed-rate residential real estate loans sold into the secondary market by the
Company. Under this agreement, which is in effect until July 31, 2000, the
maximum unpaid principal balances of the loans related to the servicing rights
to be sold to PNC Mortgage will be limited to $3.5 billion per quarter, unless
the Company and PNC Mortgage agree to a higher amount.
Loan production fees for the third quarter of 2000 of $19.0 million
were up $0.2 million from the same quarter one year ago as a result of an
increase in residential real estate loan production to $5.6 billion for the 2000
quarter from $5.0 billion for the 1999 quarter. Loan production fees declined to
$49.3 million for the first nine months of 2000 from $62.3 million for the first
nine months of 1999. This decline was driven by a reduction in residential real
estate loan production to $13.7 billion for the first nine months of 2000 from
$18.5 billion for the comparable 1999 period, largely due to the significantly
lower level of loan refinancing activity during the first six months of 2000 as
compared with the first six months of 1999.
Banking Service Fees. Banking service fees for the third quarter of
2000 amounted to $16.7 million, up 27.9% from $13.1 million for the third
quarter of 1999. For the first nine months of 2000, banking service fees totaled
$48.6 million, an increase of 31.8% from $36.9 million for the corresponding
period of 1999. These increases reflect higher transaction levels, primarily as
a result of the 1999 Acquisitions, together with changes in the Company's fee
structure.
Securities and Insurance Brokerage Fees. Securities and insurance
brokerage fees increased to $10.2 million for the 2000 third quarter from $8.9
million for the comparable 1999 quarter and to $32.0 million for the first nine
months of 2000 from $27.6 million for the same period one year ago. These
increases reflect growth in fees from securities brokerage activities of $1.3
million, or 22.2 %, for the third quarter of 2000 and $4.6 million, or 27.1%,
for the first nine months of 2000, as compared with the corresponding 1999
periods, resulting from, among other factors, the 1999 Acquisitions and a
generally more favorable interest rate environment for sales of annuity
products. Fees from insurance activities for the 2000 periods were down slightly
from the 1999 periods.
Loss Upon Designation for Sale of MBS. The Company recorded an other
than temporary impairment in value loss of $87.4 million during the third
quarter of 2000 upon the designation for sale of $1.8 billion of MBS in
connection with the MBS Sales Initiative.
Net Gains on Sales Activities. The Company recognized net gains on
sales activities of $36.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2000,
down 14.5% from $42.1 million for the same quarter one year ago. Net gains on
sales activities for the first nine months of 2000 were $103.2 million, a
decline of 37.1% from $164.1 million for the comparable prior year period. These
declines were principally associated with loans held for sale in connection with
the Company's mortgage banking activities. Sales of loans held for sale during
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2000 amounted to $5.0
billion and $11.9 billion, respectively, as compared with $5.1 billion and $19.0
billion for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 1999,
respectively.
Other. Other non-interest income increased to $3.8 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2000 from $2.4 million for the third quarter of 1999
and to $11.3 million for the first nine months of 2000 from $8.0 million for the
first nine months of 1999. These increases were substantially associated with
higher revenue from the Company's bank-owned life insurance program.
Non-Interest Expense
General. Non-interest expense amounted to $226.5 million and $638.0
million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2000, respectively.
Excluding the restructuring and other special charges recognized during the 2000
periods, non-interest expense was $182.9 million for the third quarter of 2000,
up 2.6% from $178.3 million for the
<PAGE> 22
third quarter of 1999, and $540.3 million for the first nine months of 2000,
down 1.7% from $549.8 million for the first nine months of 1999.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense
totaled $142.0 million for the third quarter of 2000, a decline of $4.1 million,
or 2.8%, from the same quarter one year ago. For the first nine months of 2000,
general and administrative expense was $422.3 million, down $23.0 million, or
5.2%, from the comparable year-ago period. These reductions were principally due
to lower mortgage banking-related expenses, largely as a result of actions taken
during 1999 in response to a slowing of related activities, productivity and
efficiency improvements, expense control initiatives and the elimination of
expenses associated with the Company's plan to prepare its computer systems for
the year 2000 (the "Year 2000 Plan"), the effects of which more than offset
additional expenses related to the 1999 Acquisitions.
Compensation and employee benefits expense totaled $77.2 million for
the third quarter of 2000 and $228.7 million for the first nine months of 2000,
down slightly from $77.5 million and $229.2 million for the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 1999, respectively. The expense levels for the
2000 periods were relatively unchanged from the 1999 periods as a result of the
net effect of numerous factors, the most significant of which were staff
additions associated with the 1999 Acquisitions and reductions in the level of
employees in the Company's mortgage banking operations. At September 30, 2000,
the Company's full-time equivalent employee complement was 6,560, down from
6,928 at December 31, 1999 and 7,100 at September 30, 1999.
Occupancy and equipment expense amounted to $28.0 million for the third
quarter of 2000, an increase of $2.1 million from the comparable prior year
quarter. For the first nine months of 2000, occupancy and equipment expense was
$83.7 million, or $7.1 million higher than the same period one year ago.
Contributing significantly to the higher expense levels were the 1999
Acquisitions, the effects of which were offset, in part, by reduced expenses
associated with the Company's mortgage banking operations.
Other G&A expense declined to $36.8 million for the third quarter of
2000 from $42.7 million for the same quarter one year ago and to $110.0 million
for the first nine months of 2000 from $139.6 million for the comparable period
of 1999. A variety of factors contributed to these declines, which occurred
despite the effects of the 1999 Acquisitions, including lower expenses incurred
by the Company's mortgage banking operations, decreases in marketing and
consulting and professional fees, as well as Year 2000 Plan expenses incurred
during the first nine months of 2000.
Amortization of Mortgage Servicing Assets. Amortization of mortgage
servicing assets amounted to $32.6 million for the third quarter of 2000, up
$4.7 million from the third quarter of 1999, substantially as a result of growth
in the average balance of mortgage servicing assets. Amortization of mortgage
servicing assets declined to $92.9 million for the first nine months of 2000
from $93.8 million for the comparable period of 1999. This decline was
attributable to a slowing of prepayment speeds of the loans underlying the
mortgage servicing assets portfolio in response to the comparatively higher
interest rate environment during the 2000 period, the impact of which was
largely offset by a higher average balance of mortgage servicing assets.
At September 30, 2000, the Company's mortgage servicing assets
(including related derivative financial instruments hedging such assets) had a
carrying value of $980.2 million and an estimated fair value of $1,010.2
million. At December 31, 1999 and September 30, 1999, the carrying value of
mortgage servicing assets amounted to $980.9 million and $938.2 million,
respectively.
Amortization of Goodwill. Amortization of goodwill was $8.3 million for
the third quarter of 2000, up $4.1 million from the same quarter in 1999. For
the first nine months of 2000, amortization of goodwill amounted to $25.0
million, or $14.4 million higher than in the comparable prior year period. These
increases were associated with the 1999 Acquisitions.
Restructuring and Other Special Charges. During the third quarter of
2000, the Company recorded the Restructuring Charge of $38.1 million in
connection with the Expense Reduction Initiative. For further information
regarding the Restructuring Charge and the Expense Reduction Initiative, see
"Strategic Actions" and Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE> 23
Other special charges recognized by the Company during the third
quarter and first nine months of 2000 amounted to $5.4 million and $59.7
million, respectively, and were associated with the Hostile Tender Offer and the
termination of the Merger. For the first nine months of 2000, these charges
included: (i) $17.4 million of legal, advisory and proxy solicitation expenses
incurred in defending against the Hostile Tender Offer; (ii) $14.4 million
related to the accelerated vesting of restricted Common Stock triggered by the
Hostile Tender Offer; (iii) $15.0 million associated with the minimum fee to be
paid by the Holding Company to Hudson pursuant to the Merger Termination
Agreement; and (iv) $12.9 million of legal, advisory, integration and other
expenses incurred in connection with the terminated Merger.
Although the Hostile Tender Offer expired on September 29, 2000, North
Fork has publicly indicated that it will attempt to replace two-thirds of the
Board at the Holding Company's 2001 annual meeting of stockholders (the "2001
Annual Meeting"). Further, the Company is involved in various litigation
regarding the Hostile Tender Offer and related matters (see Part II, Item 1,
"Legal Proceedings"). In connection therewith, the Company expects to incur
additional expenses, although the level of such expenses cannot currently be
predicted.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Termination Agreement, the Holding
Company has agreed to pay Hudson the Subsequent Transaction Fee of $50.0 million
to $92.0 million if certain events occur before October 28, 2001, including if
the Holding Company is acquired by, merges with, or sells a substantial amount
of its assets to another company. The Merger Termination Agreement also provides
for the payment of the Subsidiary Transaction Fee of $30.0 million by the
Holding Company to Hudson if the Holding Company sells a significant subsidiary
before the same date. Any Subsidiary Transaction Fee paid will be deducted from
any Subsequent Transaction Fee payment due. If none of these circumstances
occurs before October 28, 2001, the Merger Termination Agreement provides for a
$15.0 million payment by the Holding Company to Hudson.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense
The Company recognized an income tax benefit of $7.7 million for the
third quarter of 2000, as compared with income tax expense of $36.0 million for
the third quarter of 1999. For the first nine months of 2000, the Company
recognized income tax expense of $44.4 million, as compared with $106.4 million
for the comparable prior year period. On a reported basis, the Company's
effective income tax rates were 31.8% and 34.8% for the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2000, respectively, whereas, on an operating
earnings basis, such rates were 35.0% and 35.7%, respectively. The Company's
effective income tax rates, on both a reported basis and an operating earnings
basis, were 36.8% and 36.9% for the three- and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 1999, respectively. The Company currently expects its effective
income tax rate on an operating earnings basis to be 35.0% for the fourth
quarter of 2000.
Extraordinary Items
During the first nine months of 1999, the Company recognized after-tax
extraordinary losses of $4.1 million on the early extinguishment of $110.0
million of debt. These losses, which totaled $7.2 million on a pre-tax basis,
were all incurred during the first quarter of 1999.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
For purposes of its disclosures in accordance with SFAS No. 131,
"Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," the
Company has four reportable segments: Retail Banking; Commercial Banking;
Mortgage Banking; and Investment Portfolio. The Company measures the performance
of each business segment on an operating earnings basis utilizing an internal
profitability reporting system.
The performance of the Company's segments will vary from period to
period for a variety of factors. The primary factors are the amount of revenue
earned and direct expenses incurred by each segment. However, other factors may
also play an important role in segment performance. Among the most significant
of these other factors are interest rate movements and general economic
conditions, which influence the Company's transfer pricing, and the level of
internal support expenses, which are fully allocated in the Company's internal
profitability reporting process.
<PAGE> 24
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
Company's business segments (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
RETAIL COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INVESTMENT REPORTABLE RECONCILING
BANKING BANKING BANKING PORTFOLIO SEGMENTS ITEMS TOTAL
-------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the three months ended
September 30, 2000:
Operating revenue (1) $ 134,362 $ 38,063 $ 121,042 $ 15,391 $ 308,858 $(19,190) $ 289,668
Operating earnings 44,239 16,559 11,937 9,198 81,933 (12,552) 69,381
Percentage of segment
operating earnings to
total operating
earnings of
reportable segments 54.0 % 20.2 % 14.6 % 11.2 % 100.0 %
For the three months ended
September 30, 1999:
Operating revenue (1) $ 115,695 $ 28,945 $ 125,314 $ 9,739 $ 279,693 $ (3,558) $ 276,135
Operating earnings 36,924 13,113 8,721 5,258 64,016 (2,192) 61,824
Percentage of segment
operating earnings to
total operating
earnings of
reportable segments 57.7 % 20.5 % 13.6 % 8.2 % 100.0 %
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2000:
Operating revenue (1) $ 398,761 $ 108,525 $ 339,631 $ 42,873 $ 889,790 $(36,717) $ 853,073
Operating earnings 127,789 46,245 27,151 25,491 226,676 (25,406) 201,270
Percentage of segment
operating earnings to
total operating
earnings of
reportable segments 56.4 % 20.4 % 12.0 % 11.2 % 100.0 %
For the nine months ended
September 30, 1999:
Operating revenue (1) $ 323,552 $ 80,448 $ 428,720 $ 27,753 $ 860,473 $(22,717) $ 837,756
Operating earnings 98,852 36,272 44,552 14,727 194,403 (12,794) 181,609
Percentage of segment
operating earnings to
total operating
earnings of
reportable segments 50.8 % 18.7 % 22.9 % 7.6 % 100.0 %
Assets at:
September 30, 2000 $11,110,249 $5,114,592 $4,178,006 $4,187,871 $24,590,718 $641,624 $25,232,342
September 30, 1999 10,526,841 3,722,076 3,376,423 4,441,231 22,066,571 534,580 22,601,151
</TABLE>
-----------
(1) Operating revenue reflects net interest income after provision for loan
losses plus non-interest income.
<PAGE> 25
The following table sets forth reconciliations of operating earnings to
reported net (loss) income for the periods indicated (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------- ----------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating earnings $ 69,381 $ 61,824 $ 201,270 $181,609
Items not included in operating earnings:
Loss upon designation for sale of MBS (87,441) -- (87,441) --
Restructuring and other special charges (43,537) -- (97,792) --
Tax benefits on above items 45,058 -- 67,140 --
Extraordinary losses on early extinguishment of debt,
net of tax benefits of $3,044 -- -- -- (4,127)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Reported net (loss) income $(16,539) $ 61,824 $ 83,177 $177,482
=========== =========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>
For each of the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2000,
total operating revenue was $87.4 million higher than total reported revenue as
a result of the exclusion from total operating revenue of the loss upon
designation for sale of MBS. For the three- and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 1999, total operating revenue was equal to total reported revenue.
The Retail Banking segment, which focuses on individuals, includes
deposit accounts and related services, securities brokerage services, insurance
products, consumer lending activities and a portfolio of residential real estate
loans receivable. For the third quarter of 2000, the Retail Banking segment's
operating earnings were $44.2 million, an increase of $7.3 million, or 19.8%, as
compared with the same quarter of 1999. For the nine months ended September 30,
2000, the Retail Banking segment had operating earnings of $127.8 million, up
$28.9 million, or 29.3%, from the comparable period of 1999. The operating
earnings increases for this segment were principally due to higher net interest
income, which was driven by growth in average consumer loans receivable, coupled
with higher levels of fee income. These improvements principally reflect the
impact of the 1999 Acquisitions and internal growth.
The Commercial Banking segment, which includes commercial real estate
lending and business banking activities, provides both lending and deposit
products and services to business customers. The operating earnings generated by
the Commercial Banking segment were $16.6 million for the third quarter of 2000,
up 26.3% from $13.1 million for the comparable prior year quarter, and $46.2
million for the first nine months of 2000, up 27.5% from $36.3 million for the
same period one year ago. These increases largely reflect internally generated
growth in commercial real estate and business lending, coupled with benefits
associated with the 1999 Acquisitions.
The Mortgage Banking segment's activities include the production of
residential real estate loans either for the Company's portfolio or for sale
into the secondary market and servicing loans for the Company and others. The
Mortgage Banking segment had operating earnings of $11.9 million for the third
quarter of 2000, an increase of $3.2 million, or 36.9%, from the third quarter
of 1999. This increase largely reflects lower general and administrative
expense. For the first nine months of 2000, the Mortgage Banking segment's
operating earnings were $27.2 million, down $17.4 million, or 39.1%, from the
corresponding year ago period. This decline mainly reflects reduced loan
production and loan sales activities, the effects of which were partially offset
by growth in the loan servicing portfolio and lower non-interest expense.
The Investment Portfolio segment invests in certain debt and equity
securities and money market investments in conjunction with the Company's
overall liquidity, interest rate risk and credit risk management processes. The
operating earnings for this segment amounted to $9.2 million for the third
quarter of 2000, up $3.9 million from the comparable quarter of 1999. For the
first nine months of 2000, the Investment Portfolio segment had operating
earnings of $25.5 million, an increase of $10.8 million from the same period of
1999. These increases resulted primarily from higher levels of net interest
income and favorable changes in results from security sales. The increases in
net interest income were driven by growth in average balances of securities
available for sale, particularly MBS, coupled with higher security yields.
<PAGE> 26
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
General
The Company's asset/liability management is governed by policies that
are reviewed and approved annually by the Boards of Directors of the Holding
Company and the Bank, which oversee the development and execution of risk
management strategies in furtherance of these policies. The Asset/Liability
Management Committee, which is comprised of members of the Company's senior
management, monitors the Company's interest rate risk position and related
strategies.
Market Risk
In general, market risk is the sensitivity of income to variations in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and other
relevant market rates or prices, such as prices of equities. The Company's
market rate sensitive instruments include interest-earning assets,
interest-bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments.
The Company enters into market rate sensitive instruments in connection
with its various business operations, particularly its mortgage banking
activities. Loans originated, and the related commitments to originate loans
that will be sold, represent market risk that is realized in a short period of
time, generally two to three months.
The Company's primary source of market risk exposure arises from
changes in United States interest rates and the effects thereof on mortgage
prepayment and closing behavior, as well as depositors' choices ("interest rate
risk"). Changes in these interest rates will result in changes in the Company's
earnings and the market value of its assets and liabilities. The Company does
not have any material exposure to foreign exchange rate risk or commodity price
risk. Movements in equity prices may have an indirect, but limited, effect on
certain of the Company's business activities or the value of credit sensitive
loans and securities.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company manages its interest rate risk through strategies designed
to maintain acceptable levels of interest rate exposure throughout a range of
interest rate environments. These strategies are intended not only to protect
the Company from significant long-term declines in net interest income as a
result of certain changes in the interest rate environment, but also to mitigate
the negative effect of certain interest rate changes upon the Company's mortgage
banking operating results. The Company seeks to contain its interest rate risk
within a band that it believes is manageable and prudent given its capital and
income generating capacity. As a component of its interest rate risk management
process, the Company employs various derivative financial instruments.
The Company's sensitivity to interest rates is driven primarily by the
mismatch between the term to maturity or repricing of its interest-earning
assets and that of its interest-bearing liabilities. Historically, the Company's
interest-bearing liabilities have repriced or matured, on average, sooner than
its interest-earning assets.
The Company is also exposed to interest rate risk arising from the
"option risk" embedded in many of the Company's interest-earning assets. For
example, mortgages and the mortgages underlying MBS may contain prepayment
options, interim and lifetime interest rate caps and other such features
affected by changes in interest rates. Prepayment option risk affects
mortgage-related assets in both rising and falling interest rate environments as
the financial incentive to refinance a mortgage loan is directly related to the
level of the existing interest rate on the loan relative to current market
interest rates.
Extension risk on mortgage-related assets is the risk that the duration
of such assets may increase as a result of declining prepayments due to rising
interest rates. Certain mortgage-related assets are more sensitive to changes in
interest rates than others, resulting in a higher risk profile. Because the
Company's interest-bearing liabilities are not similarly affected, the gap
between the duration of the Company's interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities generally increases as interest rates rise. In
addition, in a rising interest rate environment, adjustable-rate
<PAGE> 27
assets may reach interim or lifetime interest rate caps, thereby limiting the
amount of their upward adjustment, which effectively lengthens the duration of
such assets.
Lower interest rate environments may also present interest rate risk
exposure. In general, lower interest rate environments tend to accelerate loan
prepayment rates, thus reducing the duration of mortgage-related assets and
accelerating the amortization of any premiums paid in the acquisition of these
assets. The amortization of any premiums over a shorter than expected term
causes yields on the related assets to decline from anticipated levels. In
addition, unanticipated accelerated prepayment rates increase the likelihood of
potential losses of net future servicing revenues associated with the Company's
mortgage servicing assets.
The Company is also exposed to interest rate risk resulting from
certain changes in the shape of the yield curve (particularly a flattening or
inversion -- also called "yield curve twist risk" -- of the yield curve) and to
differing indices upon which the yield on the Company's interest-earning assets
and the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities are based ("basis risk").
In evaluating and managing its interest rate risk, the Company employs
simulation models to help assess its interest rate risk exposure and the impact
of alternate interest rate scenarios, which consider the effects of
adjustable-rate loan indices, periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustment
caps, estimated loan prepayments, anticipated deposit retention rates and other
dynamics of the Company's portfolios of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company currently uses a variety of derivative financial
instruments to assist in managing its interest rate risk exposures. While the
Company's use of derivative financial instruments in managing its interest rate
exposures has served to mitigate the unfavorable effects that changes in
interest rates may have on its results of operations, the Company continues to
be subject to interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk-Management Instruments. The Company's assets have
historically repriced or matured at a longer term than the liabilities used to
fund those assets. At September 30, 2000, the Company used the following
derivative financial instruments in its efforts to reduce its repricing risk:
(i) interest rate swaps, where, based on the notional amount of the related
agreement, the Company makes fixed-rate payments and receives variable-rate
payments, all of which are tied to the one- or three-month London Interbank
Offered Rate ("LIBOR"); (ii) interest rate caps, where, in exchange for the
payment of a premium, the Company receives the excess of a designated market
interest rate (one-month LIBOR or the Bond Market Association municipal bond
index) over a specified strike rate, as applied to the notional amount of the
related agreement; (iii) interest rate cap corridors, where, in exchange for the
payment of a premium to the counterparty, the Company receives the amount by
which one-month LIBOR exceeds a specified strike rate up to a maximum rate, as
applied to the notional amount of the related agreement; (iv) interest rate
futures, where the Company pays any increase, or receives any decrease, in the
market value of the underlying financial instrument; and (v) short sales of MBS.
In addition, the Company, in connection with its issuance of time deposits with
various call features, has entered into pay variable (based on three-month
LIBOR)/receive fixed interest rate swaps with matching call features that,
considered together with the related time deposits, results in short-term
repricing liabilities. The Company uses these time deposits to replace
short-term repricing wholesale funds.
<PAGE> 28
The following table sets forth the derivative financial instruments
used by the Company at September 30, 2000 for interest rate risk-management
purposes, segregated by the activities that they hedge (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
ESTIMATED ------------------------
NOTIONAL FAIR RATE RATE
AMOUNT VALUE PAYABLE RECEIVABLE
------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Pay fixed/receive variable interest rate swaps hedging:
Securities available for sale (1) $ 728,315 $(9,969) 7.03% 6.66%
Loans receivable (1) 1,779,364 15,598 6.41 6.63
Short-term borrowings (1) 1,173,952 (1,106) 6.48 6.67
Pay variable/receive fixed interest rate swaps hedging:
Time deposits (1) 85,000 (109) 6.53 7.93
Pay fixed/receive variable forward-starting interest rate
swaps hedging:
Securities available for sale (2) 220,000 (1,363) -- --
Interest rate caps hedging:
Loans receivable (3) 87,846 88 -- --
Interest rate cap corridors hedging:
Securities available for sale (4) 59,810 2,587 -- --
Loans receivable (5) 297,160 12,117 -- --
Interest rate futures hedging:
Securities available for sale 117,000 -- -- --
Loans receivable 93,300 -- -- --
Short sales hedging:
Securities available for sale 758,000 (3,144) -- --
------------ -----------
$5,399,747 $ 14,699
============ ===========
</TABLE>
----------
(1) Variable rates are presented on the basis of rates in effect at September
30, 2000; however, actual repricings of the interest rate swaps will be
based on the applicable interest rates in effect at the actual repricing
dates.
(2) The accrual of interest does not begin until the fourth quarter of 2000.
The weighted average fixed rate payable will be 6.92% and the variable
rates receivable will be tied to either one- or three-month LIBOR.
(3) The weighted average strike rate was 6.97%.
(4) The weighted average strike rate was 5.16% and the weighted average maximum
rate was 6.28%.
(5) The weighted average strike rate was 5.15% and the weighted average
maximum rate was 6.26%.
Mortgage Banking Risk-Management Instruments. At September 30, 2000,
the Company used the following derivative financial instruments to protect
against the adverse impact on the value of the Company's mortgage servicing
assets of substantial declines in long-term interest rates and the consequent
increase in mortgage prepayment rates: (i) interest rate floors, where, in
exchange for the payment of a premium to the counterparty, the Company receives
the excess of a specified strike rate over a designated market interest rate
(generally constant maturity Treasury or swap indices), as applied to the
notional amount of the related agreement; (ii) interest rate swaps, where the
Company receives a fixed rate and pays a variable rate tied to one- or
three-month LIBOR; (iii) interest rate swaptions, where, in exchange for the
payment of a premium to the counterparty, the Company, at a future date, has the
right to enter into interest rate swap agreements; and (iv) principal-only
swaps, where the Company: (a) receives the discount realized on the underlying
principal-only security and pays a variable rate based on one-month LIBOR as
applied to the notional amount of the agreement; and (b) pays or receives
changes in the market value of the underlying principal-only security.
Two major classes of derivative financial instruments were used by the
Company at September 30, 2000 to hedge the risk in its loans held for sale and
related commitment pipeline. To the extent that the Company estimates that it
will have loans to sell, the Company sells loans into the forward MBS market.
Such short sales are similar in composition as to term and coupon with the loans
held in, or expected to be funded into, the loans held for sale portfolio. In
addition, because the amount of loans that the Company will fund, as compared
with the total amount of loans that it has committed to fund, is uncertain, the
Company purchased put options on MBS and interest rate futures.
<PAGE> 29
The following table sets forth the derivative financial instruments
used by the Company at September 30, 2000 in connection with its mortgage
banking activities, segregated by the activities that they hedge (dollars in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
------------------------
ESTIMATED VARIABLE- FIXED-RATE
NOTIONAL FAIR RATE
AMOUNT VALUE PAYABLE RECEIVABLE
------------ ----------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest rate floors hedging mortgage servicing assets (1) $2,885,000 $ 18,717 -- % -- %
Interest rate swaps hedging mortgage servicing assets (2) 637,000 (27,300) 6.62 5.97
Interest rate swaptions hedging mortgage servicing assets (3) 1,000,000 17,236 -- --
Principal-only swaps hedging mortgage servicing assets (2) 76,023 1,502 6.79 --
Forward contracts hedging loans held for sale 2,909,243 (18,355) -- --
Put options purchased hedging loans held for sale 3,000 -- -- --
------------ -----------
Total $7,510,266 $ (8,200)
============ ===========
</TABLE>
---------------
(1) The weighted average strike rate was 5.80%.
(2) Variable rates payable are presented on the basis of rates in effect at
September 30, 2000; however, actual repricings will be based on the
applicable interest rates in effect at the actual repricing dates.
(3) The weighted average strike rate was 7.35%.
Asset/Liability Repricing
The measurement of differences (or "gaps") between the Company's
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that mature or reprice
within a period of time is one indication of the Company's sensitivity to
changes in interest rates. A negative gap generally indicates that, in a period
of rising interest rates, deposit and borrowing costs will increase more rapidly
than the yield on loans and securities and, therefore, reduce the Company's net
interest margin and net interest income. The opposite effect will generally
occur in a declining interest rate environment. Although the Company has a large
portfolio of adjustable-rate assets, the protection afforded by such assets in
the event of substantial rises in interest rates for extended time periods is
limited due to interest rate reset delays, periodic and lifetime interest rate
caps, payment caps and the fact that indices used to reprice a portion of the
Company's adjustable-rate assets lag changes in market rates. Moreover, in
declining interest rate environments or certain shifts in the shape of the yield
curve, these assets may prepay at significantly faster rates than otherwise
anticipated. It should also be noted that the Company's gap measurement reflects
broad judgmental assumptions with regard to repricing intervals for certain
assets and liabilities.
The following table reflects the repricing of the Company's
interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and related derivative
financial instruments at September 30, 2000. The amount of each asset, liability
or derivative financial instrument is included in the table at the earlier of
the next repricing date or maturity. Prepayment assumptions for loans and MBS
used in preparing the table are based upon industry standards as well as the
Company's experience and estimates. Non-accrual loans have been included in the
"Over One Through Three Years" category. Demand deposits, money market deposits
and savings accounts are allocated to the various repricing intervals in the
table based on the Company's experience and estimates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROJECTED REPRICING
--------------------------------------
OVER ONE
THROUGH OVER
ONE YEAR THREE THREE
OR LESS YEARS YEARS TOTAL
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total interest-earning assets $10,409 $ 4,403 $ 7,415 $22,227
Total interest-bearing liabilities 14,902 3,769 4,290 22,961
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Periodic gap before impact of derivative financial instruments (4,493) 634 3,125 (734)
Impact of derivative financial instruments 4,113 (1,117) (2,996) --
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Periodic gap $ (380) $ (483) $ 129 $ (734)
=========== =========== ========== ==========
Cumulative gap $ (380) $ (863) $ (734)
=========== =========== ==========
Cumulative gap as a percentage of total assets (1.5) % (3.4) % (2.9) %
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 30
MANAGEMENT OF CREDIT RISK
The Company's credit risk arises from the possibility that borrowers,
issuers, or counterparties will not perform in accordance with contractual
terms. The Company has a process of credit risk controls and management
procedures by which it monitors and manages its level of credit risk.
The Company's non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans and
other real estate owned, net. Non-accrual loans are all loans 90 days or more
delinquent, as well as loans less than 90 days past due for which the full
collectability of contractual principal or interest payments is doubtful.
The following table presents the components of the Company's
non-performing assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 1999 1999
------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Non-accrual loans:
Residential real estate $44,537 $51,293 $54,477
Commercial real estate 3,484 5,208 3,452
Consumer 9,924 10,424 12,596
Business 16,013 2,437 290
------------- ------------- --------------
Total non-accrual loans 73,958 69,362 70,815
------------- ------------- --------------
Other real estate owned, net:
Residential real estate 16,176 9,978 8,655
Commercial real estate 1,388 6,963 12,154
Allowance for losses (233) (250) (812)
------------- ------------- --------------
Total other real estate owned,
net 17,331 16,691 19,997
------------- ------------- --------------
Total non-performing assets $91,289 $86,053 $90,812
============= ============= ==============
Non-performing assets to total assets 0.36 % 0.36 % 0.40 %
Non-accrual loans to loans receivable 0.46 0.46 0.50
</TABLE>
The Company continues to expand its lending activities and product mix.
The Company intends to continue to monitor closely the effects of these efforts
on the overall risk profile of its loans receivable portfolio, which the Company
expects will continue to change over time.
The level of loans delinquent less than 90 days may, to some degree, be
an indicator of future levels of non-performing assets. The following table sets
forth, at September 30, 2000, such delinquent loans of the Company, net of those
already in non-performing status (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DELINQUENCY PERIOD
---------------------------------
30 - 59 60 - 89
DAYS DAYS TOTAL
---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Residential real estate $23,558 $ 9,790 $33,348
Commercial real estate 458 24 482
Consumer 23,846 5,820 29,666
Business 2,221 1,286 3,507
---------- ----------- ----------
Total $50,083 $16,920 $67,003
========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 31
The following table sets forth the activity in the Company's allowance
for loan losses for the periods indicated (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------- -----------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period $143,432 $121,381 $140,296 $105,081
Provision for loan losses 7,000 7,000 21,000 22,500
Additions due to acquisitions -- 12,300 -- 17,265
Loan charge-offs:
Residential real estate (1,858) (3,053) (9,956) (9,865)
Commercial real estate (143) (586) (175) (1,215)
Consumer (2,363) (2,154) (8,147) (3,706)
Business (848) (28) (973) (72)
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Total loan charge-offs (5,212) (5,821) (19,251) (14,858)
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Loan recoveries:
Residential real estate 356 765 1,135 2,162
Commercial real estate 200 709 821 3,363
Consumer 877 721 2,640 1,540
Business 2 22 14 24
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Total loan recoveries 1,435 2,217 4,610 7,089
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Net loan charge-offs (3,777) (3,604) (14,641) (7,769)
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of period $146,655 $137,077 $146,655 $137,077
========== ========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
On an annualized basis, net loan charge-offs represented 0.09% of
average loans receivable for the third quarter of 2000, as compared with 0.11%
for the third quarter of 1999, and 0.12% for the first nine months of 2000, as
compared with 0.08% for the first nine months of 1999.
The following table sets forth the Company's allowance for loan losses
coverage ratios at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 1999 1999
------------- -------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for loan losses to:
Loans receivable 0.91% 0.92% 0.96%
Non-accrual loans 198.29 202.27 193.57
</TABLE>
Of the $2.9 billion carrying value of the Company's MBS available for
sale portfolio at September 30, 2000, $2.1 billion were issued by entities other
than the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"), the Government
National Mortgage Association ("GNMA") and the Federal National Mortgage
Association ("FNMA"). These privately-issued MBS, which have generally been
underwritten by large investment banking firms, are subject to certain
credit-related risks normally not associated with MBS issued by FHLMC, GNMA and
FNMA.
The level of credit risk associated with derivative financial
instruments depends on a variety of factors, including the estimated fair value
of the instrument, the collateral maintained, the use of master netting
arrangements and the ability of the counterparty to comply with its contractual
obligations. In the event of default by a counterparty, the Company would be
subject to an economic loss that corresponds to the cost to replace the
agreement. The Company's credit risk associated with its use of derivative
financial instruments amounted to $34.5 million at September 30, 2000 and $73.9
million at December 31, 1999. There were no past due amounts related to the
Company's derivative financial instruments at September 30, 2000 or December 31,
1999.
<PAGE> 32
FINANCIAL CONDITION
General
The Company's total assets amounted to $25.2 billion at September 30,
2000, up $1.3 billion, or 5.5%, from December 31, 1999. This increase was driven
by growth in loans receivable and loans held for sale, the impact of which was
partially offset by a reduction in securities available for sale.
Securities Available for Sale
Securities available for sale amounted to $3.3 billion at the end of
the 2000 third quarter, a decline of $507.9 million, or 13.2%, since the end of
1999. Contributing significantly to this decline were sales (including certain
sales settling in October 2000) of approximately $0.7 billion of the $1.8
billion of MBS that were designated for sale during the 2000 third quarter under
the MBS Sales Initiative. The Company expects that the remaining sales of MBS in
connection with the MBS Sales Initiative will be largely completed by the end of
2000 and fully completed by the end of the first quarter of 2001.
At September 30, 2000, MBS available for sale comprised 13.1% of total
interest-earning assets, down from 16.5% at year-end 1999. On a pro forma basis
at September 30, 2000, assuming the sales of all of the MBS designated for sale
under the MBS Sales Initiative had been consummated as of that date, the MBS
available for sale portfolio represented 8.9% of total interest-earning assets.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair
value of securities available for sale at the dates indicated (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------------------- -------------------------
AMORTIZED ESTIMATED AMORTIZED ESTIMATED
COST FAIR VALUE COST FAIR VALUE
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MBS:
Pass-through securities:
Privately-issued $1,549,550 $1,530,632 $2,296,046 $2,245,491
U.S. government agencies 824,778 814,534 886,854 845,159
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Privately-issued 557,116 559,561 422,938 408,945
U. S. government agencies 17,680 17,228 18,726 18,093
Interest-only 455 381 940 499
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total MBS 2,949,579 2,922,336 3,625,504 3,518,187
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Other debt securities:
U. S. government agencies 75,000 75,188 -- --
State and municipal 24,400 24,484 15,478 15,112
Domestic corporate 358,904 305,603 345,410 304,081
Foreign government 500 500 500 500
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total other debt securities 458,804 405,775 361,388 319,693
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Equity securities 13,570 13,662 12,490 11,796
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total securities available for sale $3,421,953 $3,341,773 $3,999,382 $3,849,676
============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The amortized cost of securities available for sale exceeded their
estimated fair value by $80.2 million at September 30, 2000, down from $149.7
million at December 31, 2000. Contributing significantly to this reduction was
the loss of $87.4 million recognized by the Company upon implementation of the
MBS Sales Initiative.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale into the secondary market in connection with the
Company's mortgage banking activities amounted to $2.4 billion at September 30,
2000. In comparison, loans held for sale totaled $1.7 billion at December 31,
1999.
<PAGE> 33
Loans Receivable
Loans receivable (exclusive of the allowance for loan losses) amounted
to $16.1 billion at the end of the 2000 third quarter, up from $15.2 billion at
year-end 1999. This growth was associated with commercial real estate, consumer
and business loans which, in the aggregate, increased $1.0 billion, or 15.0%,
since December 31, 1999. These loans totaled $8.1 billion at September 30, 2000
and comprised 50.2% of total loans receivable at that date, up from 46.1% at
December 31, 1999. A key component of the Company's strategy with respect to its
loans receivable is to continue to increase the aggregate percentage of its
commercial real estate, consumer and business loans receivable to total loans
receivable.
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company's loans
receivable at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------------------ ------------------------ INCREASE
PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE (DECREASE)
AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL IN AMOUNT
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Residential real estate $ 7,995,503 49.8% $ 8,200,120 53.9% $(204,617)
Commercial real estate:
Multi-family 1,821,980 11.4 1,771,928 11.7 50,052
Other 2,152,013 13.4 1,710,929 11.2 441,084
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Total commercial
real estate 3,973,993 24.8 3,482,857 22.9 491,136
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Consumer:
Home equity 1,929,398 12.0 1,489,669 9.8 439,729
Automobile 902,218 5.6 886,176 5.8 16,042
Other 110,368 0.7 119,476 0.8 (9,108)
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Total consumer 2,941,984 18.3 2,495,321 16.4 446,663
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Business 1,139,558 7.1 1,028,756 6.8 110,802
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Total loans receivable $16,051,038 100.0% $15,207,054 100.0% $ 843,984
============= ========== ============= ========== =============
</TABLE>
Deposits
At September 30, 2000, deposits amounted to $13.9 billion, down from
$14.3 billion at the end of 1999. This reduction was largely due to runoff of
time deposits. While core deposits also declined, the Company experienced a
slight increase in the percentage of core deposits to total deposits.
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company's deposits at
the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------------------ ------------------------ INCREASE
PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE (DECREASE)
AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL IN AMOUNT
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Core:
Demand $ 2,164,997 15.6% $ 2,071,419 14.5% $ 93,578
Savings 2,297,577 16.5 2,407,528 16.9 (109,951)
Money market 3,163,355 22.8 3,201,298 22.5 (37,943)
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Total core 7,625,929 54.9 7,680,245 53.9 (54,316)
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Time 6,277,129 45.1 6,581,204 46.1 (304,075)
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
Total deposits $13,903,058 100.0% $14,261,449 100.0% $(358,391)
============= ========== ============= ========== =============
</TABLE>
Borrowed Funds
Total borrowed funds increased $1.3 billion, or 16.9%, during the
first nine months of 2000 and amounted to $9.1 billion at September 30, 2000.
This increase was largely associated with the support of growth in interest-
<PAGE> 34
earning assets. The Company currently expects the level of its borrowed funds to
decline in the near term as substantially all of the proceeds from MBS sales in
connection with the MBS Sales Initiative are expected to be initially used to
reduce borrowed funds.
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company's borrowed
funds at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
2000 1999
------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase:
Federal funds purchased $ 1,759,000 $ 785,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 1,501,488 321,067
------------- ------------
Total federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase 3,260,488 1,106,067
------------- ------------
Other short-term borrowings:
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances 4,500,959 3,711,086
Treasury tax and loan notes 130,906 1,598,154
Other 8,598 12,598
------------- ------------
Total other short-term borrowings 4,640,463 5,321,838
------------- ------------
Long-term debt:
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances 591,512 751,600
Senior notes 349,273 348,322
Medium-term notes 48,350 48,541
Bonds, preferred stock and loans transferred in
put transactions 15,634 17,405
------------- ------------
Total long-term debt 1,004,769 1,165,868
------------- ------------
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in Dime Bancorp,
Inc.'s junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures 152,236 152,219
------------- ------------
Total borrowed funds $9,057,956 $7,745,992
============= ============
</TABLE>
Stockholders' Equity
Stockholders' equity was $1.8 billion at September 30, 2000, up $270.1
million from year-end 1999. Contributing significantly to this increase was the
purchase by Warburg during the 2000 third quarter of 12,009.491 shares of Series
B Preferred Stock, warrants to purchase 8,142.738 shares of Series C Preferred
Stock and warrants to purchase 3,866.753 shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The
proceeds from the issuance of these securities, after issuance costs, was $197.0
million. On October 6, 2000, Warburg completed its investment in the Holding
Company under the Warburg Agreement by purchasing, for $28.0 million, 1,598.173
shares of Series B Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 1,598.173 shares of
Series D Preferred Stock.
At the end of the third quarter of 2000, stockholders' equity
represented 6.25% of total assets, as compared with 6.34% at December 31, 1999.
Book value per common share and tangible book value per common share increased
to $14.38 and $9.70, respectively, at September 30, 2000 from $13.67 and $8.84,
respectively, at the end of 1999.
During February 2000, in connection with the Merger, the Holding
Company rescinded its Common Stock repurchase program that was announced in
September 1998, which had authorized the Holding Company to repurchase up to
approximately 5.6 million shares of Common Stock. A total of 4.2 million shares
of Common Stock were repurchased under this program, all of which were acquired
prior to the beginning of 2000.
During May 2000, the Holding Company purchased 2,469,100 shares of
Common Stock, at a per share price of $18.25, from Hudson. These shares, which
had been acquired in the open market by Hudson, were purchased by the Holding
Company pursuant to the terms of the Merger Termination Agreement, which
provided that, if Hudson decided to sell its shares of Common Stock, it was
required to offer to sell them to the Holding Company first.
<PAGE> 35
On October 6, 2000, the Holding Company announced a program to purchase
up to 13,607,644 shares of Common Stock. No time limit has been set for
completion of this program. This program replaced the previously announced Dutch
Auction Tender Offer, which had commenced on August 1, 2000 and was terminated
on October 6, 2000. No shares of Common Stock were purchased under the Dutch
Auction Tender Offer.
Cash dividends declared and paid by the Holding Company on the Common
Stock were $0.08 per share for the third quarter of 2000 and $0.22 per share for
the first nine months of 2000, up from $0.06 per share and $0.17 per share for
the third quarter and first nine months of 1999, respectively. On October 20,
2000, the Holding Company announced the declaration of a cash dividend of $0.10
per share of Common Stock. This dividend will be paid on December 6, 2000 to
Common Stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 24, 2000.
LIQUIDITY
The Company's liquidity management process focuses on ensuring that
sufficient funds exist to meet withdrawals by depositors, loan funding
commitments, debt service requirements and other financial obligations and
expenditures, as well as ensuring the Bank's compliance with regulatory
liquidity requirements. The liquidity position of the Company, which is
monitored on a daily basis, is managed pursuant to established policies and
guidelines.
The Company's sources of liquidity include principal repayments on
loans and MBS, borrowings, deposits, sales of loans in connection with mortgage
banking activities, sales of securities available for sale and cash provided by
operations. The Company has access to the capital markets for issuing debt or
equity securities and the Bank has access to the discount window of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, if necessary, for the purpose of borrowing to meet
temporary liquidity needs.
Excluding funds raised through the capital markets, the primary source
of funds of the Holding Company, on an unconsolidated basis, has been dividends
from the Bank, whose ability to pay dividends is subject to regulations of the
OTS. At September 30, 2000, the Holding Company had an effective shelf
registration with the Commission under which it could issue an aggregate of
$150.0 million of debentures, notes or other unsecured evidences of
indebtedness. On November 13, 2000, the Commission declared effective a new
shelf registration pursuant to which the Holding Company could issue an
additional $350.0 million of debentures, notes or other unsecured evidences of
indebtedness. The $500.0 million of debt securities issuable under these shelf
registrations, which may be unsubordinated or subordinated to certain other
obligations of the Holding Company, may be offered separately or together in one
or more series. As previously discussed, the Holding Company entered into the
Warburg Agreement during July 2000, pursuant to which Warburg has purchased, for
approximately $238 million, various securities issued by the Holding Company.
Under existing OTS regulations, the Bank must maintain, for each
calendar quarter, an average daily balance of liquid assets (as defined) equal
to at least 4.00% of either (i) its liquidity base (the Bank's net withdrawable
accounts plus short-term borrowings) at the end of the preceding calendar
quarter or (ii) the average daily balance of its liquidity base during the
preceding quarter. The Bank was in compliance with these regulations for the
third quarter of 2000.
REGULATORY CAPITAL
Pursuant to regulations of the OTS, the Bank is required to maintain
tangible capital of at least 1.5% of adjusted total assets, core ("tier 1")
capital of at least 3.0% of adjusted total assets and total risk-based capital
of at least 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. The Bank exceeded these capital
requirements at September 30, 2000.
Under the prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the OTS
pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991,
an institution is considered well capitalized, the highest of five categories,
if its ratio of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets is 10.0% or
more, its ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is 6.0% or more, its
ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets is 5.0% or greater, and it is not
subject to any order or directive by the OTS to meet a specific capital level.
At September 30, 2000, the Bank met the published standards for a well
capitalized designation under these regulations.
<PAGE> 36
The following table sets forth the regulatory capital position of the
Bank at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------------------ ------------------------
AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
------------- ---------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tangible and core capital $1,452,105 5.86% $1,383,046 5.90%
Tier 1 risk-based capital 1,452,105 8.66 1,383,046 8.80
Total risk-based capital 1,698,760 10.13 1,623,342 10.33
</TABLE>
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Information required by this item is contained in Item 2, "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations --
Asset/Liability Management," incorporated herein by reference.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There have not been any material developments regarding the status of
the Bank's goodwill lawsuit against the United States government since the
filing of the 1999 10-K.
On March 5, 2000, North Fork announced its intention to make a hostile
offer to acquire all of the outstanding Common Stock and to terminate the Merger
Agreement. The Hostile Tender Offer, which formally commenced on March 15, 2000,
expired on September 29, 2000. In connection with the Hostile Tender Offer,
FleetBoston Financial Corporation ("FleetBoston"), formerly Fleet Boston
Corporation, announced that it had agreed, among other things, to invest an
aggregate of $250 million in exchange for preferred stock of North Fork and
rights to purchase North Fork's common stock. This agreement was terminated in
connection with the expiration of the Hostile Tender Offer.
On March 6, 2000, North Fork had filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court
of Chancery against the Holding Company and members of the Board alleging, among
other things, breaches of fiduciary duties by the Board with respect to the
then-pending Merger. On October 30, 2000, North Fork voluntarily discontinued
its claims without prejudice.
The Holding Company remains subject to 17 putative class action
lawsuits filed during March 2000 by various Common Stockholders (collectively,
the "Stockholder Actions"). Each of the Stockholder Actions alleges, among other
things, breaches of fiduciary duties by the Board, including the rejection by
the Board of the Hostile Tender Offer. In addition, on or about July 26, 2000,
the plaintiffs in some of the Stockholder Actions filed a motion seeking leave
to file an amended complaint. The proposed amended complaint alleges, among
other things, that the Holding Company's directors have sought to entrench
themselves by "spurning" North Fork's offer, "deploying" the Rights Agreement,
and entering into the Warburg Agreement. The proposed amended complaint seeks
injunctive relief requiring, among other things, the Holding Company to auction
itself. As of the date of this document, a briefing schedule on the motion for
leave to file an amended complaint has not been set.
On March 10, 2000, the Holding Company had filed suit in the Supreme
Court of the State of New York,
<PAGE> 37
County of New York, against North Fork and FleetBoston alleging violations of
New York's antitrust laws. On October 11, 2000, the Holding Company voluntarily
discontinued its claims without prejudice.
On March 21, 2000, the Holding Company had filed suit in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against North Fork
and members of North Fork's board of directors in connection with alleged false
and misleading statements contained in documents distributed by North Fork to
Common Stockholders. On April 24, 2000, North Fork had filed counterclaims
against the Holding Company for alleged false and misleading statements in
documents sent by the Holding Company to Common Stockholders. On October 27,
2000, the Holding Company and North Fork filed a joint stipulation voluntarily
dismissing their respective claims without prejudice.
On March 29, 2000, the Holding Company filed suit in the Supreme Court
of the State of New York, County of New York, against Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.
("Salomon"), which had been acting as a financial advisor to North Fork in
connection with the Hostile Tender Offer. The complaint alleges violations of a
provision of a confidentiality agreement, dated May 12, 1997, between the
Holding Company and Salomon, which the complaint states prohibits Salomon, for a
three-year period, from providing financial advisory services to any entity
interested in acquiring or otherwise entering into a business combination
transaction with the Holding Company without obtaining the Holding Company's
prior written consent to either the transaction or the provision of such advice
(the "Confidentiality Agreement"). On April 5, 2000, the state court granted the
Holding Company's motion to preliminarily enjoin Salomon from acting as a
financial advisor to North Fork until May 12, 2000, the date the relevant
provision of the Confidentiality Agreement expired by its terms (the
"Preliminary Injunction"). On April 6, 2000, Salomon filed a notice of appeal in
the Appellate Division of the State of New York, First Department, alleging that
the state court erred when it granted the Preliminary Injunction, and also filed
a motion in the appellate court seeking to vacate the state court's order
imposing the Preliminary Injunction. The appellate court denied Salomon's motion
to vacate on May 3, 2000. On May 10, 2000, the court declined to extend the
Preliminary Injunction beyond May 12, 2000. On May 17, 2000, the Holding Company
amended its complaint to include a claim for monetary damages from Salomon and a
claim against North Fork. On June 30, 2000, North Fork moved to dismiss the
amended complaint as against North Fork, which was denied on September 13, 2000.
On October 19, 2000, the Holding Company moved for partial summary judgment
against Salomon, which has opposed the motion and cross-moved for summary
judgment against the Holding Company. The Holding Company has opposed the
cross-motion.
On July 14, 2000, North Fork filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of
Chancery against the Holding Company and several of its directors. This
complaint, among other things, seek a declaratory judgment as to the effect of
the vote at the Holding Company's 2000 annual meeting of stockholders (the "2000
Annual Meeting") such that the Holding Company's directors up for election at
the 2000 Annual Meeting (the "2000 Nominees") would have the status of holdover
directors and an order requiring the Holding Company to hold an election for
five directors to fill the Board positions now occupied by the 2000 Nominees at
a timely convened special meeting of stockholders or, in the alternative, no
later than the 2001 Annual Meeting. On July 24, 2000, certain Common
Stockholders filed a putative class action suit, Coleman v. Toal, et. al., in
the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking similar relief. On November 8, 2000, the
Delaware Court of Chancery granted North Fork's motion for summary judgment and
ruled that at the 2001 Annual Meeting two classes of directors (representing
eleven board seats) will stand for election. The Holding Company has 30 days to
appeal.
For a further discussion of the matters discussed above, see the
Holding Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended June 30,
2000 and March 31, 2000.
The Holding Company believes that its various claims against North Fork
and Salomon are meritorious and that the various claims made against the Holding
Company and the Board are without merit. However, it is not possible to predict
the outcome of these claims at this time.
Certain claims, suits, complaints and investigations involving the
Company, arising in the ordinary course of business, have been filed or are
pending. The Company is of the opinion, after discussion with legal counsel
representing the Company in these proceedings, that the aggregate liability or
loss, if any, arising from the ultimate disposition of these matters would not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position
or results of operations.
<PAGE> 38
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
For a description of the various securities issued under the Warburg
Agreement, see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The
issuance of these securities was exempt from registration under the Securities
Act of 1933 pursuant to Section 4(2) of that act because the issuance did not
involve a public offering.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At the 2000 Annual Meeting, which was held on July 14, 2000, the only
matter considered by Common Stockholders was the election of five directors of
the Holding Company for three-year terms. The following table sets forth the
individuals nominated for election, as well as the results.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WITHHELD
NOMINEE FOR AUTHORITY
------------------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
J. Barclay Collins II 23,834,093 55,221,451
James F. Fulton 23,832,395 55,223,149
Virginia M. Kopp 23,816,243 55,239,301
Sally Hernandez-Pinero 23,820,337 55,235,207
Lawrence J. Toal 23,737,518 55,318,026
</TABLE>
For a discussion of certain litigation against the Holding Company
regarding the effect of the 2000 Annual Meeting, see Item 1, "Legal
Proceedings."
The following directors of the Board, whose terms did not expire at the
2000 Annual Meeting, continued to serve as directors of the Board following the
2000 Annual Meeting: Derrick D. Cephas; Frederick C. Chen; Richard W. Dalrymple;
Fred B. Koons; James M. Large, Jr.; John Morning; Margaret Osmer-McQuade; Eugene
G. Schulz, Jr.; Howard Smith; Dr. Norman R. Smith; Anthony P. Terracciano; and
Ira T. Wender.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
During the three-month period ended September 30, 2000, the Holding
Company filed with the Commission the following Current Reports on Form 8-K:
-- Form 8-K, filed on July 11, 2000 (as amended by Form 8-K/A, filed on
October 12, 2000), regarding the Warburg Agreement and other
strategic initiatives.
-- Form 8-K, filed on July 12, 2000, regarding a press release
announcing the Company's consolidated financial results for the
quarter ended June 30, 2000.
-- Form 8-K, filed on September 15, 2000, regarding a press release
announcing profit improvement initiatives to be undertaken by the
Company.
<PAGE> 39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DIME BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)
Dated: November 13, 2000 By: /s/ Lawrence J. Toal
------------------ --------------------
Lawrence J. Toal
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Operating Officer
Dated: November 13, 2000 By: /s/ Anthony R. Burriesci
----------------- ------------------------
Anthony R. Burriesci
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November 13, 2000 By: /s/ John F. Kennedy
----------------- -------------------
John F. Kennedy
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE> 40
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
<S> <C>
27 Financial Data Schedule (filed electronically)
</TABLE>
