<PAGE>
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JUNE 20, 1996
REGISTRATION NO. 333-3890
REGISTRATION NO. 333-3890-01
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
FORM S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
</TABLE>
(EXACT NAMES OF REGISTRANTS AS SPECIFIED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE GOVERNING
DOCUMENTS)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MARYLAND NORTH CAROLINA
</TABLE>
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION OF EACH
REGISTRANT)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
56-1871668 56-1869557
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
</TABLE>
3100 SMOKETREE COURT
SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
(919) 872-4924
(ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF
REGISTRANT'S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
RONALD P. GIBSON, PRESIDENT
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
3100 SMOKETREE COURT, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
(919) 872-4924
(NAME, ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE,
OF AGENT FOR SERVICE)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COPIES TO:
<S> <C>
BRAD S. MARKOFF, ESQ. CATHERINE S. GALLAGHER, ESQ.
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P. ANDREWS & KURTH L.L.P.
316 W. EDENTON STREET 1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
(919) 755-8700 (202) 662-2700
</TABLE>
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF THE PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
From time to time after the effective date of this registration statement.
If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following
box. [ ]
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box. [X]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. [X]
THE REGISTRANTS HEREBY AMEND THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANTS
SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A),
MAY DETERMINE.
<PAGE>
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Registration Statement relates to securities which may be offered from
time to time by Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the "Company") and Highwoods/Forsyth
Limited Partnership, a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Operating
Partnership"). This Registration Statement contains a form of basic prospectus
(the "Basic Prospectus") relating to both the Company and the Operating
Partnership which will be used in connection with an offering of securities by
the Company or the Operating Partnership. The specific terms of the securities
to be offered will be set forth in a Prospectus Supplement relating to such
securities. To the extent securities of the Operating Partnership, which are
limited to unsecured nonconvertible debt securities, are offered pursuant to the
enclosed Basic Prospectus, the Basic Prospectus will include the financial
statements, together with notes and schedules of the Operating Partnership set
forth on pages F-1 through F-42 of the Basic Prospectus.
<PAGE>
(This Redherring language appears on the left side of the
page rotated 90 degrees)
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY
NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT SHALL
NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR
SHALL
THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER,
SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR
QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF SUCH STATE.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT DATED JUNE 20, 1996
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(TO PROSPECTUS DATED JUNE , 1996)
10,000,000 SHARES
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. (HIGHWOODS LOGO)
COMMON STOCK
Highwoods Properties, Inc. ("Highwoods" or the "Company") is a
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") that
owns and operates a portfolio of 102 suburban office properties and 98
industrial (including 62 service center) properties located in Raleigh-Durham,
Winston-Salem, Greensboro and Charlotte, North Carolina; Nashville, Tennessee;
and Richmond, Virginia. The Company is the largest full service public real
estate company in North Carolina. The Company has entered into a merger
agreement with Crocker Realty Trust, Inc. ("Crocker") pursuant to which
Highwoods will acquire Crocker's 58 suburban office properties and 12 service
center properties located in the Southeastern United States (the "Merger").
Assuming consummation of the Merger, which is expected to occur in the third
quarter of 1996, Highwoods will become one of the largest full service real
estate operating companies in the Southeast, specializing in the ownership,
management, acquisition and development of suburban office and industrial
properties.
All of the shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company
(the "Common Stock") offered hereby (the "Offering") are being sold by the
Company. The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE")
under the symbol "HIW." On June 19, 1996, the last reported sale price of the
Common Stock on the NYSE was $27 3/8. See "Price Range of Common Stock and
Distribution History."
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE S-10 HEREIN AND ON PAGE 4 IN THE
ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS FOR CERTAIN FACTORS RELEVANT TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE
COMMON STOCK.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION
PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
OR THE PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
[CAPTION]
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PRICE TO UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO
PUBLIC DISCOUNT(1) COMPANY(2)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Per Share...........................................
Total (3)...........................................
</TABLE>
(1) The Company has agreed to indemnify the several Underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. See "Underwriting."
(2) Before deducting estimated expenses payable by the Company of $ .
(3) The Company has granted the Underwriters an option to purchase up to an
additional 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock to cover over-allotments. If all
of such shares are purchased, the total Price to Public, Underwriting
Discount and Proceeds to Company will be $ , $ and $ ,
respectively. See "Underwriting."
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED ON OR ENDORSED THE
MERITS OF THIS OFFERING. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
The shares of Common Stock are offered by the several Underwriters, subject
to prior sale, when, as and if delivered to and accepted by them, subject to
approval of certain legal matters by counsel for the Underwriters. The
Underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify such offer and to
reject orders in whole or in part. It is expected that delivery of the Common
Stock offered hereby will be made in New York, New York on or about June ,
1996.
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC.
MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
INCORPORATED
PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED
PRUDENTAL SECURTES INCORPORATED
THE ROBINSON-HUMPHREY COMPANY, INC.
SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC.
The date of this Prospectus Supplement is June , 1996.
<PAGE>
(Highwoods logo)
(A map of the southern part of the United States showing the original
market areas and expansion markets appear here)
* ASSUMES COMPLETION OF THE MERGER. NO ASSURANCE CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE MERGER
WILL BE CONSUMMATED. SEE "RISK FACTORS" HEREIN AND IN THE PROSPECTUS AND
"RECENT DEVELOPMENTS" HEREIN.
IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OVER-ALLOT OR EFFECT
TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK AT
A LEVEL ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH
TRANSACTIONS MAY BE EFFECTED ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, IN THE OVER-THE-
COUNTER MARKET OR OTHERWISE. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED
AT ANY TIME.
S-2
<PAGE>
(Inside Cover Fold Out Pages)
(Highwoods Logo) Highwoods Properties, Inc.
Crocker Properties to be Acquired*
(Left Inside Page)
Top Left Photo--International Place Phase II, Memphis, TN
Middle Left Photo--Water Oak, Charlotte, NC
Bottom Left Photo--Ridgefield I, Asheville, NC
Top Right Photo--Scott Center, Boca Raton, FL
Bottom Right Photo--One Boca Place, Boca Raton, FL
(Right Inside Page)
Top Left Photo--Progressive Insurance, Tampa, FL
Bottom Left Photo--Grandview I, Birmingham, AL
Top Right Photo--Tower Place, Tampa, FL
Middle Right Photo--Center Point I, Columbia, SC
Bottom Right Photo--Atrium, Tampa, FL
*Assumes completion of the Merger. No assurance can be given that the
Merger will be consummated. See "Recent Developments".
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY
THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE MORE DETAILED
DESCRIPTIONS AND THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATEMENTS APPEARING ELSEWHERE IN
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS OR INCORPORATED
HEREIN AND THEREIN BY REFERENCE. UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES, THE TERM
(I) "COMPANY" OR "HIGHWOODS" SHALL MEAN HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC., PREDECESSORS
OF HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. AND THOSE ENTITIES OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC., INCLUDING HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (THE
"OPERATING PARTNERSHIP"), (II) "CROCKER" SHALL MEAN CROCKER REALTY TRUST, INC.,
ITS PREDECESSORS AND THOSE ENTITIES OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY CROCKER, (III)
"HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES" SHALL MEAN THE 102 SUBURBAN OFFICE AND 98 INDUSTRIAL
(INCLUDING 62 SERVICE CENTER) PROPERTIES OWNED BY THE COMPANY, (IV) "CROCKER
PROPERTIES" SHALL MEAN THE 58 SUBURBAN OFFICE AND 12 SERVICE CENTER PROPERTIES
OWNED BY CROCKER AND (V) "PROPERTIES" SHALL MEAN THE HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES AND
THE CROCKER PROPERTIES COMBINED. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPERTIES AS OF
MARCH 31, 1996 INCLUDES THE SEVEN PROPERTIES ACQUIRED BY THE COMPANY ON APRIL 1,
1996 FROM EAKIN & SMITH, INC. AND THEIR AFFILIATES ("EAKIN & SMITH") AND
EXCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT TWO PROPERTIES PLACED IN SERVICE BY THE COMPANY AFTER
MARCH 31, 1996.
THE COMPANY
GENERAL
The Company is a self-administered and self-managed REIT that owns and
operates a portfolio of 200 properties (the "Highwoods Properties") located in
Raleigh-Durham (the "Research Triangle"), Winston-Salem/Greensboro (the
"Piedmont Triad") and Charlotte, North Carolina; Nashville, Tennessee; and
Richmond, Virginia. The Highwoods Properties consist of 102 suburban office
properties and 98 industrial (including 62 service center) properties, contain
an aggregate of approximately 10.3 million rentable square feet and are leased
to approximately 1,100 tenants. At March 31, 1996, the Highwoods Properties were
94% leased. The Company also owns approximately 215 acres of land for future
development. All of the development land is zoned and available for office and
industrial development, 178 acres of which have utility infrastructure already
in place. The Company conducts substantially all of its activities through, and
all of its properties are held directly or indirectly by, Highwoods/Forsyth
Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), of which the Company is the
sole general partner.
The Company has entered into a merger agreement with Crocker Realty Trust,
Inc. ("Crocker") pursuant to which Highwoods will acquire Crocker's 58 suburban
office properties and 12 service center properties (the "Crocker Properties"),
which are located in 15 markets throughout the Southeastern United States (the
"Merger"). Assuming consummation of the Merger, which is expected to occur in
the third quarter of 1996, Highwoods will own an aggregate of 270 suburban
office and industrial properties, containing 15.9 million rentable square feet,
which were 94% leased at March 31, 1996. The Company believes that the Merger
provides Highwoods a unique investment opportunity for future growth by allowing
the Company to expand and diversify its operations to growth-oriented markets
throughout the Southeast.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Since becoming a public company in June 1994, it has been Highwoods'
strategy to:
(Bullet) Diversify its initial suburban office portfolio to include
industrial and service center properties;
(Bullet) Expand its geographical presence to selected Southeastern markets
with growth and demographic characteristics similar to its
existing markets;
(Bullet) Effectively manage growth through the acquisition of management
expertise along with additional properties;
(Bullet) Maintain a flexible and conservative capital structure; and
(Bullet) Build an efficient, customer service-oriented regional
organization.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
PENDING ACQUISITION OF CROCKER REALTY TRUST, INC.
GENERAL. On April 29, 1996, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Crocker Realty Trust, Inc. As a result
of the Merger, Highwoods will acquire 58 suburban office properties
S-3
<PAGE>
and 12 service center properties located in 15 Southeastern markets in Florida,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia and Alabama. The
Crocker Properties encompass 5.7 million rentable square feet and, at March 31,
1996, were 95% leased. For a description of the properties to be acquired in the
Merger, see "Business and Properties -- The Crocker Properties."
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company will acquire all of
the outstanding capital stock of Crocker in exchange for a cash payment of
$11.02 per share, subject to certain adjustments. Based on Crocker's 26,981,087
shares of outstanding capital stock at May 31, 1996, the purchase price will
total approximately $297 million. In addition, the Company will cash out certain
existing options and warrants to purchase Crocker common stock for an estimated
$4.2 million and assume approximately $240 million of Crocker's currently
outstanding indebtedness. In connection with the Merger, the Company has also
entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with
certain of Crocker's stockholders who collectively own approximately 83% of
Crocker's outstanding common stock, which obligates such stockholders to sell
their shares to the Company at a cash price of $11.02, subject to the same
adjustments as required under the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement and the
Stock Purchase Agreement may be terminated by the respective parties only in
certain limited circumstances. In addition, under the terms of the Merger
Agreement, certain specified assets and liabilities of Crocker will not be
acquired by the Company. See "Recent Developments -- Pending Acquisition of
Crocker Realty Trust, Inc."
MANAGEMENT OF CROCKER PROPERTIES. Upon completion of the Merger (or if
earlier, June 30, 1996), Crocker's three senior officers, Thomas J. Crocker,
Richard S. Ackerman and Robert E. Onisko, will resign as officers and directors
of Crocker. See "Risks Factors -- Risks Associated with Rapid Growth." Following
the consummation of the Merger, Highwoods will retain the services of several
key Crocker employees who will be responsible for managing a significant portion
of the Crocker Properties. See "Recent Developments -- Pending Acquisition of
Crocker Realty Trust, Inc." and " -- Organizational Changes."
EAKIN & SMITH TRANSACTION
On April 1, 1996, the Company completed a merger with Eakin & Smith and its
affiliates ("Eakin & Smith") combining their property portfolios, management
teams and business operations. Through the combination, the Company succeeded to
the ownership of seven suburban office buildings totaling 848,000 square feet, a
103,000-square foot suburban office development project, 18 acres of development
land and Eakin & Smith's brokerage and property management operations. All the
properties and development land are located in Nashville, Tennessee. At March
31, 1996, the properties acquired in the Eakin & Smith Transaction were 97%
leased.
The aggregate cost to the Company of the Eakin & Smith Transaction,
assuming the completion of the in-process development project, was approximately
$98.5 million payable through the issuance of 537,138 limited partnership units
("Units") of the Operating Partnership and 489,421 shares of the Common Stock,
the assumption of $37 million of indebtedness (with a weighted average fixed
rate of 8.0%), and cash payments of approximately $33 million. The aggregate
cost excludes deferred payments totaling 54,056 shares of Common Stock, which
are attributable to Eakin & Smith's brokerage and property management operation;
the payments will be made over a four-year period provided certain annual
operating measurements are achieved.
As part of the Eakin & Smith Transaction, the three principals of Eakin &
Smith, Inc. received options to purchase 105,000 shares of Common Stock at
$27.50 per share. Such options vest in four equal annual installments beginning
with the second anniversary of the date of grant. Such principals also received
warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock for $28.00 per share. In
addition, John W. Eakin and Thomas S. Smith were added to the Company's Board of
Directors.
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
The following table summarizes the three development projects placed in
service by the Company during 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RENTABLE INITIAL
PROPERTY PROPERTY TYPE LOCATION SQUARE FEET COST
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Hewlett Packard Office Piedmont Triad 15,000 $ 1,000,000
Global Software Office Research Triangle 92,700 7,500,000
Regency One Industrial Piedmont Triad 127,600 3,500,000
Total 235,300 $12,000,000
</TABLE>
S-4
<PAGE>
The Company has eight suburban office properties and one industrial
property under development totaling 791,000 square feet of space. The following
table summarizes these projects:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
RENTABLE ESTIMATED PERCENT COMPLETION
OFFICE PROPERTIES LOCATION SQUARE FEET COST PRELEASED DATE
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MSA Research Triangle 57,000 $ 6,200,000 100% 4Q96
Healthsource Research Triangle 180,000 14,400,000 100 4Q96
One Shockoe Plaza Richmond 118,000 15,000,000 100 4Q96
Highwoods One Richmond 126,000 12,500,000 0 4Q96
Situs One Research Triangle 58,000 5,100,000 58 4Q96
Maryland Way Nashville 103,000 11,500,000 50 4Q96
Inacom Piedmont Triad 13,000 900,000 100 4Q96
North Park Research Triangle 40,000 4,000,000 40 1Q97
Total or Weighted Average 695,000 $69,600,000 67%
<CAPTION>
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Regency Two Piedmont Triad 96,000 $ 2,800,000 39% 4Q96
Total or Weighted Average 791,000 $72,400,000 66%
</TABLE>
Following the Merger, the Company will continue Crocker's development of an
approximately 81,000-square foot office building in Center Point Office Park in
Columbia, South Carolina. Crocker owns the other office building in the park,
which building was 100% leased at March 31, 1996. The total cost of the project
is expected to be approximately $7.6 million, including the purchase of the
land. Pursuant to a contract entered into with the contractor, the construction
costs are fixed. The building is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter
of 1996 and is approximately 50% pre-leased.
OTHER PENDING ACQUISITIONS
The Company has entered into agreements to acquire two suburban office
properties: one in Richmond, Virginia and the other in Nashville, Tennessee. The
properties encompass 155,000 square feet in the aggregate and will be acquired
at a total cost of $15.3 million. The purchase price will be funded through a
$10.4 million cash payment and the assumption of a $4.9 million, 8.75%
non-recourse mortgage loan. Additionally, the Company has entered into a letter
of intent to acquire two suburban office properties totaling 224,000 square feet
and three acres of land in Nashville and Charlotte in exchange for 305,438 Units
and $5.7 million in cash.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES AND LIQUIDITY
Set forth below is a summary description of the Company's recent financing
activities:
CREDIT FACILITY. In March 1996, the Company closed on a $140 million
unsecured credit facility (the "Credit Facility"), which replaced an $80 million
secured facility. The Credit Facility is with NationsBank, First Union National
Bank of North Carolina and Wachovia Bank of North Carolina and requires monthly
payment of interest and matures on September 30, 1999. The initial interest rate
on the Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 150 basis points. The interest rate will
adjust based on the Company's senior unsecured credit rating within a range of
LIBOR plus 100 basis points to LIBOR plus 175 basis points. The replacement of
the secured facility with the Credit Facility enhanced the Company's financial
flexibility by releasing the liens on 24 properties with a book value of
approximately $226 million.
FINANCING OF THE EAKIN & SMITH TRANSACTION. The Company financed the Eakin
& Smith Transaction through the issuance of 537,138 Units and 489,421 shares of
Common Stock, the assumption of $37.0 million of mortgage indebtedness and a
$26.6 million draw on the Credit Facility. The mortgage indebtedness assumed has
an average fixed rate of approximately 8% and an average remaining life of
approximately six years. Approximately $5.5 million of the mortgage indebtedness
is fixed at a rate of 7.7% to the maturity date of the underlying debt through
the use of an interest rate swap. Further, the Company entered into a five-year,
$7.0 million interest rate swap agreement that commences in January 1997 and
effectively fixes $7.0 million of the Company's variable rate debt at 8.0%.
S-5
<PAGE>
FINANCING OF THE PENDING MERGER. In connection with the Merger, the Company
obtained a commitment from NationsBank and First Union National Bank of North
Carolina for a $250 million revolving line of credit (the "Revolving Loan"). The
Revolving Loan will replace the Credit Facility and will be used together with
the proceeds from the Offering to fund the Merger.
The Revolving Loan will be unsecured for the first nine months and will
bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 150 basis points. After the initial
nine-month period, the Revolving Loan will either convert to a secured loan with
a maturity date two years from its closing date or to an unsecured loan maturing
on July 31, 1999. The Revolving Loan will remain unsecured if the Company
generates at least $300 million of net proceeds from equity offerings (including
the proceeds from this Offering) during the initial nine-month period and meets
certain covenants, including covenants relating to debt ratios, tangible net
worth and interest coverage.
If the Revolving Loan remains unsecured after the initial nine-month
period, it would have an interest rate that ranged from LIBOR plus 100 basis
points to LIBOR plus 175 basis points based on the Company's senior unsecured
credit rating. If the loan converts to a secured facility, the Company will be
required to pledge assets at least equal in value to 60% of the outstanding
amount of the Revolving Loan and the interest rate will equal LIBOR plus 175
basis points.
Also in connection with the Merger, the Company will assume approximately
$239.5 million of indebtedness at an average rate of 8.57%. This indebtedness
includes: (i) a $140 million mortgage note (the "Mortgage Note") with a fixed
rate of 7.9% (ii) variable rate mortgage loans in the aggregate amount of $69.4
million with a weighted average interest rate of 9.4% at March 31, 1996 and
(iii) fixed rate mortgage loans in the amount of $30.1 million with a weighted
average interest rate of 9.8%.
The Company is currently considering various alternatives related to the
$99.5 million of indebtedness to be assumed in the Merger other than the
Mortgage Note. The Company may repay this indebtedness with the proceeds from
the issuance of either senior unsecured debt or conventional mortgage debt. To
limit its exposure to increasing interest rates, the Company has entered into a
forward-starting $75 million interest rate swap agreement that commences on
September 15, 1996. The interest rate swap matures on September 15, 2003 and
will limit the Company's exposure to increases in interest rates on either $75
million of LIBOR based floating rate borrowings or $75 million of fixed rate
debt issued in the future. Upon commencement of the interest rate swap, the
Company will pay the counterparty a fixed rate of 7.02% while the counterparty
will pay the Company an amount equal to 30-day LIBOR.
PRO FORMA CAPITALIZATION. Assuming completion of the Offering and the
Merger, the Company's pro forma debt as of March 31, 1996 would have totaled
$550.3 million and would have represented 37% of total market capitalization
(based on a stock price of $27 3/8). The Company's pro forma interest coverage
ratio (defined as income before minority interest plus depreciation and
amortization and interest expense divided by contractual interest expense) for
the quarter ended March 31, 1996 would have equaled 2.86x.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES
On May 20, 1996, the Company announced certain changes to its
organizational structure, which will allow the Company to utilize its existing
senior management for overall leadership while taking advantage of certain
members of Crocker's management to integrate Crocker into the Highwoods
organization. These changes will provide property and market specific experience
to the combined portfolio. The Company believes that upon the completion of the
Merger, approximately 85% of its portfolio will be managed and leased on a
day-to-day basis by personnel that have previously managed, leased or developed
the properties for which they are responsible.
In connection with the organizational changes, William T. Wilson, III was
appointed to the newly created position of executive vice president and chief
operating officer. Mr. Wilson will assume responsibility for all aspects of the
Company's divisional operations and the Company's acquisition group. Prior to
this appointment, he served as executive vice president and was responsible for
the operations of the Forsyth division, which included the operations of the
Piedmont Triad and Charlotte area properties. John E. Reece II will assume Mr.
Wilson's responsibilities with respect to the Piedmont Triad area properties and
will serve the Company as a vice president. Mr. Reece was previously responsible
for the leasing, marketing and development activities of the Forsyth division.
In addition, John W. Eakin has been appointed as senior vice president and will
be responsible for operations in Tennessee (Nashville and Memphis), Alabama and
Florida (Tampa, Boca Raton, Orlando and Jacksonville). Since joining the Company
in April 1996
S-6
<PAGE>
in connection with the Eakin & Smith Transaction, Mr. Eakin has been responsible
for the Company's Nashville operations.
Upon completion of the Merger, Highwoods will retain the services of
several key Crocker employees who will be responsible for managing a significant
portion of the Crocker Properties, including Thomas F. Cochran who will manage
the Company's business in Charlotte, North Carolina, Greenville, South Carolina,
and Atlanta, Georgia; Michael E. Harris, who will be responsible for the
management of the properties in the Memphis, Tennessee area; Scott I. Peek, Jr.,
who will manage the Company's business in the Tampa, Orlando and Jacksonville,
Florida areas and Timothy F. Vallace, who will manage the Boca Raton area
properties. See "Recent Developments -- Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty
Trust, Inc." and " -- Organizational Changes."
THE PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth certain information about the Properties as
of March 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUALIZED RENTAL REVENUE (1)
OFFICE INDUSTRIAL
PROPERTIES PROPERTIES (2) TOTAL
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ $ 86,585,628 $ 16,053,429 $102,639,057
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 58,467,277 8,919,366 67,386,643
Total..................................................................... $145,052,905 $ 24,972,795 $170,025,700
<CAPTION>
RENTABLE SQUARE FEET
OFFICE INDUSTRIAL
PROPERTIES PROPERTIES (2) TOTAL
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ 6,389,737 3,674,951 10,064,688
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 4,449,739 1,212,084 5,661,823
Total..................................................................... 10,839,476 4,887,035 15,726,511
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT LEASED
INDUSTRIAL
OFFICE PROPERTIES WEIGHTED
PROPERTIES (2) AVERAGE
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ 95%(3) 91%(4) 94%
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 95(5) 93(6) 95
Weighted average.......................................................... 95% 92% 94%
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE AGE (YEARS)(7)
INDUSTRIAL
OFFICE PROPERTIES WEIGHTED
PROPERTIES (2) AVERAGE
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ 10.4 9.2(8) 10.2
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 8.9 11.2 9.2
Weighted Average (5)...................................................... 9.8 9.7 9.8
</TABLE>
(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is March 1996 rental revenue (base rent plus
operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
(2) Includes 74 service center properties, 12 of which are Crocker Properties.
(3) Includes 23 single-tenant properties comprising 1.5 million rentable square
feet and 61,000 rentable square feet leased but not occupied.
(4) Includes 17 single-tenant properties comprising 1.0 million rentable square
feet and 27,000 rentable square feet leased but not occupied.
(5) Includes 13 single-tenant properties comprising 861,000 rentable square feet
and 68,000 rentable square feet leased but not occupied.
(6) Includes three single-tenant properties comprising 258,000 rentable square
feet and 14,000 square feet leased but not occupied.
(7) Weighted according to Annualized Rental Revenue.
(8) Excludes Ivy Distribution Center. Ivy is a 400,000-rentable square foot
warehouse, which was constructed in stages. A portion of the building was
built in 1930; major expansions took place in the mid-1940s, mid-1950s and
1981. In 1989, the entire property was renovated to convert it from a
manufacturing facility to a warehouse.
S-7
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth certain information about the Properties in
each of the 16 markets as of March 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUALIZED
OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TOTAL RENTABLE RENTAL
PROPERTIES PROPERTIES (1) PROPERTIES SQUARE FEET REVENUE
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Research Triangle, NC................................. 61 4 65 4,078,229 $ 53,994,987
Piedmont Triad, NC.................................... 23 78 101 4,296,563 27,684,440
Nashville, TN......................................... 7 3 10 1,192,511 15,095,578
Tampa, FL............................................. 20 -- 20 1,155,483 14,170,231
Charlotte, NC......................................... 12 16 28 1,253,847 13,088,036
Boca Raton, FL........................................ 3 -- 3 506,834 9,682,756
Greenville, SC........................................ 5 2 7 687,150 7,501,621
Memphis, TN........................................... 5 -- 5 382,131 7,232,995
Richmond, VA.......................................... 10 1 11 481,908 5,284,603
Atlanta, GA........................................... 2 3 5 706,745 4,948,214
Columbia, SC.......................................... 5 -- 5 318,713 4,011,072
Orlando, FL........................................... 2 -- 2 200,796 2,011,534
Birmingham, AL........................................ 1 -- 1 111,905 1,632,892
Norfolk, VA........................................... 1 1 2 179,006 1,481,603
Jacksonville, FL...................................... 1 -- 1 50,513 1,104,854
Asheville, NC......................................... 1 1 2 124,177 1,100,284
Total............................................... 159 109 268 15,726,511 $170,025,700
</TABLE>
(1) Includes 74 service center properties.
THE OFFERING
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Shares Offered........................................ 10,000,000 (1)
Shares to be Outstanding After the Offering........... 34,168,560 (2)
Use of Proceeds....................................... To purchase the shares of Crocker Realty Trust, Inc.
NYSE Symbol........................................... "HIW"
</TABLE>
(1) Assumes the Underwriters' over-allotment option to purchase up to 1,500,000
shares of Common Stock is not exercised. See "Underwriting."
(2) Includes (a) 29,898,970 shares of Common Stock to be outstanding after the
Offering and (b) 4,269,590 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon
redemption of outstanding Units, which are redeemable by the holder for cash
or, at the option of the Company, shares of Common Stock on a one-for-one
basis. Excludes (i) 890,500 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance
upon exercise of options granted pursuant to the Amended and Restated 1994
Stock Option Plan, (ii) 250,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued
upon the exercise of warrants granted to certain officers in connection with
certain property acquisitions and (iii) 54,056 shares of Common Stock that
may be issued in connection with the Eakin & Smith Transaction and 40,000
shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon redemption of Units that may
be issued in connection with certain property acquisitions.
SUMMARY SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating information
for the Company on a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 1995 and as
of and for the three months ended March 31, 1996. The following table also sets
forth selected financial and operating information on an historical basis for
the Company for the period from June 14, 1994 (commencement of operations) to
December 31, 1994, for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for the three months
ended March 31, 1996 and 1995. The following information should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto incorporated by
reference herein and the pro forma financial statements and notes thereto
included and incorporated by reference herein.
The pro forma operating data for the year ended December 31, 1995 assumes
that the Forsyth Transaction, the Research Commons Acquisition, the Other
Acquisitions, the Second Offering, the Third Offering, the Eakin & Smith
S-8
<PAGE>
Transaction, the Merger and this Offering all occurred as of January 1, 1995.
The pro forma balance sheet as of March 31, 1996 assumes that this Offering, the
Eakin & Smith Transaction and the Merger all occurred on March 31, 1996. The pro
forma operating data for the three months ended March 31, 1996 assumes that this
Offering, the Eakin & Smith Transaction and the Merger occurred as of January 1,
1995.
The pro forma information is based upon certain assumptions that are
included in the notes to the pro forma financial statements incorporated by
reference herein and the pro forma financial statements included elsewhere in
this Prospectus Supplement. The pro forma financial information is unaudited and
is not necessarily indicative of what the financial position and results of
operations of the Company would have been as of and for the periods indicated,
nor does it purport to represent the future financial position and results of
operations for future periods.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HISTORICAL
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA JUNE 14,
THREE MONTHS ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED 1994 TO
MARCH 31, MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1996 1995 1995 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA:
Total revenue................. $ 45,850 $ 23,757 $ 12,846 $172,142 $ 73,522 $ 19,442
Rental property operating
expenses.................... 13,437(1) 6,154(2) 3,053(2) 46,225(1) 17,049(2) 5,110(2)
General and administrative.... 1,284 934 523 4,218 2,737 810
Interest expense.............. 11,660 3,951 2,470 47,806 13,720 3,220
Depreciation and
amortization................ 6,755 3,716 1,921 26,587 11,082 2,607
Income (loss) before minority
interest.................... 12,714 9,002 4,879 47,306 28,934 7,695
Minority interest............. (1,589) (1,571) (800) (5,913) (4,937) (808)
Income before extraordinary
item........................ 11,125 7,431 4,079 41,393 23,997 6,887
Extraordinary item-loss on
early extinguishment of
debt........................ -- -- (875) -- (875) (1,273)
Net income (loss)............. $ 11,125 $ 7,431 $ 3,204 $ 41,393 $ 23,122 $ 5,614
Net income per common share... $ 0.37 $ 0.38 $ 0.29 $ 1.38 $ 1.49 $ .63
BALANCE SHEET DATA
(AT END OF PERIOD):
Real estate, net of
accumulated depreciation.... $1,225,525 $602,276 $429,556 $ -- $593,066 $207,976
Total assets.................. 1,288,157 632,644 455,909 -- 621,134 224,777
Total mortgages and notes
payable..................... 550,311 196,718 140,698 -- 182,736 66,864
OTHER DATA:
Number of in-service
properties.................. 268 191 108 -- 191 44
Total rentable square feet.... 15,727,000 9,211,000 6,914,000 -- 9,215,171 2,746,219
</TABLE>
(1) Rental property operating expenses include salaries, real estate taxes,
insurance, repairs and maintenance, property management, security,
utilities, leasing, development, and construction expenses.
(2) Rental property operating expenses include salaries, real estate taxes,
insurance, repairs and maintenance, property management, security and
utilities.
S-9
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. ACTUAL
RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT MIGHT CAUSE SUCH A DIFFERENCE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT
LIMITED TO, THOSE DISCUSSED BELOW AND IN THE PROSPECTUS UNDER "RISK FACTORS." AN
INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK INVOLVES VARIOUS RISKS. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS
SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE PROSPECTUS
BEFORE PURCHASING COMMON STOCK IN THE OFFERING.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH RAPID GROWTH
The Company is currently experiencing a period of rapid growth. After
giving effect to the Eakin & Smith Transaction and the Merger, the Company's
property portfolio will have increased from 193 properties, consisting of
approximately 9.4 million rentable square feet, to 270 properties, consisting of
approximately 15.9 million rentable square feet. The Company's ability to manage
its growth effectively will require it to integrate successfully the Eakin &
Smith management team and those members of the Crocker management team who will
continue with the Company after the Merger into its existing management
structure. In connection with the Eakin & Smith Transaction, the Company
retained all of Eakin & Smith's 46 employees. Furthermore, in connection with
the Merger, the Company expects to add approximately 50 administrative, property
management, leasing, marketing and maintenance personnel employed by Crocker.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to integrate these
additional employees into its organization or to manage the combined operations
effectively. Furthermore, the inability of the Company to integrate the
Properties in a timely and efficient manner could have an adverse effect on the
Company's business.
Upon completion of the Merger, four former officers of Crocker will join
the Company as vice presidents. Thomas F. Cochran will manage the Charlotte
division, which includes Greenville, South Carolina and Atlanta, Georgia;
Michael E. Harris will manage the Memphis division; Scott I. Peek, Jr. will
manage the Tampa division, which includes Jacksonville and Orlando; and Timothy
F. Vallace will manage the Boca Raton division. Thomas J. Crocker, the chairman
of the board and chief executive officer of Crocker, Richard S. Ackerman, the
president and chief operating officer of Crocker, and Robert E. Onisko, the vice
president and chief financial officer of Crocker, will not join the Company.
There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to integrate
successfully the Crocker Properties into its portfolio without them.
Furthermore, it is expected that Messrs. Crocker, Ackerman and Onisko will
continue to be engaged in the commercial real estate business following the
Merger. As part of their severance agreements, Messrs. Crocker, Ackerman and
Onisko have agreed not to compete with the Company within the city limits of
Boca Raton, Florida for periods ranging from 12 months (Mr. Onisko) to 18 months
(Messrs. Crocker and Ackerman), except with respect to certain contracts that
Mr. Crocker has to manage certain office projects owned by third parties and
with respect to a mixed-use retail and office complex known as Mizner Park,
which is owned by Mr. Crocker. Otherwise, Messrs. Crocker, Ackerman and Onisko
will be able to compete with the Company in all of its markets. See "Recent
Developments -- Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty Trust, Inc. -- Management
of Crocker Properties." Finally, there can be no assurance that the Merger will
be consummated. See "Recent Developments -- Pending Acquisition of Crocker
Realty Trust, Inc."
RISK OF FAILURE OF CROCKER TO QUALIFY AS A REIT
Upon consummation of the Merger, Crocker will become a subsidiary of the
Operating Partnership. Except for the Federal and state income taxes that might
be payable upon the distribution of certain assets that will be distributed
directly or indirectly to the stockholders of Crocker prior to the Merger (the
"Excluded Assets"), the Merger has been structured to defer any tax recognition
to Crocker. To accomplish this, the Company intends to maintain Crocker's
separate status as an operating REIT. To maintain Crocker's REIT status, the
Company intends to cause Crocker to sell a sufficient amount of common stock to
at least 110 individuals to enable Crocker to meet the test for qualification of
a REIT under Section 856(a)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code"). The aggregate amount of common stock to be issued to such minority
stockholders is not expected to exceed 1.0% of the equity of Crocker.
The Company expects Crocker at all times to maintain its status as a REIT
and to continue to be organized and operated so as to maintain its qualification
as a REIT. Since the ownership of Crocker stock by the Operating Partnership is
considered to be the ownership of a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT
qualification tests and since distributions received from a REIT are income
included in both the 95% and 75% income tests of Code Sections 856(c)(2) and
(3), the Company's qualification as a REIT should not be affected by the
acquisition and ownership of Crocker. If, however, Crocker fails to qualify as a
REIT for any reason while its shares are owned by the Company or
S-10
<PAGE>
the Operating Partnership, the Company will no longer qualify as a REIT and the
Company would be taxed as if it were a domestic corporation and its stockholders
would be taxed in the same manner as stockholders of ordinary corporations. In
that event, the Company could be subject to potentially significant tax
liabilities and, therefore, the amount of cash available for distribution to its
stockholders would be substantially reduced or eliminated.
Although the Company believes, and Crocker has represented, that commencing
with Crocker's taxable year ended December 31, 1995, Crocker has operated in
such a manner so as to meet the Code requirements for qualification as a REIT no
assurances can be given that Crocker will qualify as REIT now or in the future.
Crocker's qualification as a REIT is a condition to the Company's obligation to
consummate the Merger. See "Recent Developments -- Pending Acquisition of
Crocker Realty Trust, Inc." herein and "Federal Income Tax Considerations" in
the Prospectus.
POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CROCKER PROPERTIES
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations,
such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
or "CERCLA," and common laws, an owner or operator of real estate is liable for
the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on
or in such property as well as certain other costs, including governmental fines
and injuries to persons and property. Such laws often impose such liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of such
substances, or the failure to remediate such substances properly, may adversely
affect the owner's or operator's ability to sell or rent such property or to
borrow using such property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal
or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs
of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment
facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person.
Certain environmental laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing
materials ("ACM") into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners
or operators of real property for personal injuries associated with ACM. In
connection with its ownership and operation of its properties, the Company may
be potentially liable for these costs. In addition, the presence of hazardous or
toxic substances at a site adjacent to or in the vicinity of a property could
require the property owner to participate in remediation activities in certain
cases or could have an adverse effect on the value of such property.
All of the Crocker Properties have been subjected to assessments by
independent environmental consultants in the last three years. The environmental
assessments of the Crocker Properties have not revealed any environmental
liability that the Company believes would have a material adverse effect on the
Company's results of operations, liquidity or financial position taken as a
whole, nor is the Company aware of any such material environmental liability.
Nevertheless, it is possible that the assessments do not reveal all
environmental liabilities or that there are material environmental liabilities
of which the Company is unaware. In addition, assumptions regarding the
existence and nonexistence of contamination and groundwater flow are based on
available sampling data, and there are no assurances that the data is reliable
in all cases. Moreover, there can be no assurance that (i) future laws,
ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability
or (ii) the current environmental condition of the Crocker Properties will not
be affected by tenants, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity
of the Crocker Properties (such as the presence of underground storage tanks),
or by third parties unrelated to the Company. The environmental assessments have
revealed the following:
(Bullet) A property located southwest of the Sabal VI property is
listed on EPA's National Priority List (NPL). Groundwater at
the site contains elevated levels of inorganic metals and the
site appears to be hydraulically upgradient from the Sabal VI
property. Sampling at the southwestern boundary of the Sabal
VI property indicated levels of inorganic metals in the
groundwater above the cleanup standards, while levels of such
constituents in the soil were normal. Clean-up is ongoing at
the NPL site, funded by responsible parties. Based on
information known to date, there is no indication that the
Sabal VI property is a source of this contamination, and it
is unlikely that EPA or any other party would seek to impose
liability on the Company for the presence of such
contaminants.
(Bullet) Contamination exists in groundwater at two NPL sites adjacent
to and upgradient from the Grassmere properties. Due to the
geology of the area, the consultant advised that sampling on
the property would not
S-11
<PAGE>
definitively determine whether contamination from off-site
had reached the Grassmere properties; therefore, no on-site
sampling was performed. Funded clean-ups are ongoing at both
NPL sites. Based on information known to date, there is no
indication that the Grassmere properties are a source of the
contamination, and it is unlikely that EPA or any other party
would seek to impose liability on the Company for the
presence of such contamination.
(Bullet) Lead was detected above the federal action level in drinking
water from limited outlets at seven of the Crocker
Properties. Federal law only requires that public water
suppliers take action when this level is exceeded and
requires no direct action by the Company. Sampling was
limited and more thorough sampling would be required to
accurately determine the sources and levels of lead in those
buildings. However, if elevated lead levels do exist, it
could present the potential for allegations of liability from
third parties.
Some tenants use or generate hazardous substances in the ordinary course of
their respective businesses. These tenants are required under their leases to
comply with all applicable laws and have agreed to indemnify the Crocker for any
claims resulting from noncompliance. The Company is not aware of any
environmental problems resulting from tenants' use or generation of hazardous
substances. There are no assurances that all tenants will comply with the terms
of their leases or remain solvent and that the Company may not at some point be
responsible for contamination caused by such tenants.
SEE "RISK FACTORS" IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS FOR A DISCUSSION OF
CERTAIN OTHER FACTORS RELEVANT TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK.
S-12
<PAGE>
THE COMPANY
GENERAL
Highwoods Properties, Inc. ("Highwoods" or the "Company") is a
self-administered and self-managed REIT that owns and operates a portfolio of
200 properties (the "Highwoods Properties") located in Raleigh-Durham (the
"Research Triangle"), Winston-Salem/Greensboro (the "Piedmont Triad") and
Charlotte, North Carolina; Nashville, Tennessee; and Richmond, Virginia. The
Highwoods Properties consist of 102 suburban office properties and 98 industrial
(including 62 service center) properties, contain an aggregate of approximately
10.3 million rentable square feet and are leased to approximately 1,100 tenants.
At March 31, 1996, the Highwoods Properties were 94% leased. The Company also
owns approximately 215 acres of land for future development. All of the
development land is zoned and available for office and industrial development,
178 acres of which have utility infrastructure already in place. The Company has
entered into a merger agreement with Crocker Realty Trust, Inc. pursuant to
which Highwoods will acquire Crocker's 58 suburban office properties and 12
service center properties (the "Crocker Properties"), which are located in 15
markets throughout the Southeastern United States (the "Merger"). Assuming
consummation of the Merger, which is expected to occur in the third-quarter of
1996, Highwoods will own an aggregate of 270 suburban office and industrial
properties, containing 15.9 million rentable square feet, thereby becoming one
of the largest full service real estate operating companies in the Southeast,
specializing in the ownership, management, acquisition and development of
suburban office and industrial properties. The Company believes that the Merger
provides Highwoods a unique investment opportunity for future growth by allowing
the Company to expand and diversify its operations to growth-oriented markets
throughout the Southeast.
The Company conducts substantially all of its activities through, and all
of its properties are held directly or indirectly by, Highwoods/Forsyth Limited
Partnership (the "Operating Partnership"). The Company is the sole general
partner of the Operating Partnership and as of May 31, 1996, owned 82% of the
partnership interests (the "Units") in the Operating Partnership and following
the Offering will own approximately 87% of the Units. The remaining Units are
owned by limited partners (including certain officers and directors of the
Company). Each Unit may be redeemed by the holder thereof for cash or, at the
Company's option, one share (subject to certain adjustments) of Common Stock.
With each such exchange, the number of Units owned by the Company and,
therefore, the Company's percentage interest in the Operating Partnership, will
increase.
In addition to owning the Highwoods Properties and the development land,
the Operating Partnership also provides services associated with leasing,
property management, real estate development, construction and miscellaneous
tenant services for its properties as well as for third parties. The Company
conducts its third-party fee-based services through two subsidiaries of the
Operating Partnership, Highwoods Services, Inc. and Forsyth Properties Services,
Inc. (the "Service Companies"), and Forsyth-Carter Brokerage, L.L.C.
("Forsyth-Carter Brokerage"), a joint venture with Carter Oncor International.
The Company was incorporated in Maryland in February 1994. Its executive
offices are located at 3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600, Raleigh, North Carolina
27604, and its telephone number is (919) 872-4924. The Company also maintains
regional offices in the Piedmont Triad, Charlotte, Richmond and Nashville.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Since becoming a public company in June 1994, it has been Highwoods'
strategy to:
(Bullet) Diversify its initial suburban office portfolio to include
industrial and service center properties;
(Bullet) Expand its geographical presence to selected Southeastern markets
with growth and demographic characteristics similar to its
existing markets;
(Bullet) Effectively manage growth through the acquisition of management
expertise along with additional properties;
(Bullet) Maintain a flexible and conservative capital structure; and
(Bullet) Build an efficient, customer service-oriented regional
organization.
DIVERSIFY PRODUCT TYPE. The Company's strategy has been to assemble a
portfolio of properties that enable it to offer buildings with a variety of
cost, tenant finish and amenity choices that satisfy the facility needs of a
wide range of tenants seeking commercial space. This strategy led, in part, to
the Company's initial combination with Forsyth Properties, Inc. in February 1995
(the "Forsyth Transaction"), which added a diverse mix of industrial and service
center
S-13
<PAGE>
properties (as well as additional office properties) to its existing suburban
office portfolio. The Company sought to diversify its portfolio to include
industrial and service center properties because (i) such properties are less
management intensive than most other classes of real estate, thereby reducing
both operating and administrative expenses; (ii) industrial and service center
properties generally do not require significant tenant improvement expenditures
by the landlord to induce tenants to lease space and, with respect to industrial
properties, tenants often make substantial improvements to the properties, which
increase the likelihood of the tenant renewing its lease; and (iii) the
development cycle for industrial and service center properties is relatively
short, thereby mitigating development period risks. The Company focuses on the
development and acquisition of facilities that may be adapted for lease to
replacement tenants with facility needs different from the prior tenant, even
where the building was constructed on a build-to-suit basis for the initial
tenant.
The Company seeks to acquire suburban office and industrial properties at
prices below replacement cost that offer attractive returns, including
acquisitions of underperforming, high quality assets in situations offering
opportunities for the Company to improve such assets' operating performance. The
Company will also continue to engage in the selective development of suburban
office and industrial projects, primarily in suburban business parks, and
intends to focus on build-to-suit projects and projects where the Company has
identified sufficient demand. In build-to-suit development, the building is
significantly pre-leased to one or more tenants prior to construction.
Furthermore, the Company believes that through build-to-suit projects, which
often foster strong long-term relationships between the Company and the tenant,
the Company positions itself for future development projects as the facility
needs of the tenant increase. The Company also believes that its 215 acres of
development land should provide it with a competitive advantage in its future
development activities. The Company will also selectively seek opportunities for
fee-producing development, management and brokerage business with third-party
owners through the Service Companies and Forsyth-Carter Brokerage.
The Company may from time to time acquire properties from property owners
through the exchange of Units in the Operating Partnership for the property
owner's equity in the acquired properties. The Units received by these property
owners would be redeemable for cash or, at the Company's option, shares of
Common Stock. In connection with these transactions, the Company may also assume
outstanding indebtedness associated with the acquired properties. The Company
believes that this acquisition method may permit the Company to acquire
properties at attractive prices from property owners wishing to enter into tax
deferred transactions. Since the Company's inception, it has acquired 94
properties, comprising 5.8 million rentable square feet using the foregoing
structure.
EXPANSION OF GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS. The Company has sought to increase the size
of its portfolio by investing in markets that, like the Research Triangle, have
strong demographic and economic characteristics. This strategy was also a major
reason for the Forsyth Transaction, which broadened the Company's focus from
beyond the Research Triangle to the Piedmont Triad and Charlotte areas of North
Carolina, and led to the Company acquiring substantial portfolios in Richmond,
Virginia and Nashville, Tennessee. The Company believes that the properties
located in these markets have the potential over the long term to provide
investment returns that exceed national averages. Each of the Company's existing
markets has experienced strong employment, population and household formation
growth over the past five years and is expected to continue to demonstrate
strong growth over the next five years.
The Merger is a logical extension of the Company's expansion strategy. The
Crocker Properties are located in four of the Company's existing markets and 11
other Southeastern markets with similar characteristics, including favorable
employment, population and household formation growth and favorable suburban
office and industrial supply and demand conditions when compared to national
averages. The Merger would allow the Company to build upon its positions in its
current markets and to establish an immediate presence in 11 additional markets
located throughout the Southeast.
MANAGED GROWTH STRATEGY. The Company's strategy has been to focus its real
estate activities in markets where it believes its extensive local knowledge
gives it a competitive advantage over other real estate developers and operators
with less local experience, particularly with regard to site selection, market
information and clients. Through the Forsyth Transaction and its subsequent
business combinations with Ross-Kreckman in July 1995 and with Eakin & Smith in
April 1996, the Company was able to diversify its portfolio and to expand its
geographic focus to include the three major North Carolina markets, as well as
Richmond, Virginia and Nashville, Tennessee. In each of these transactions, the
Company was able to maintain its localized approach to real estate by combining
with local real estate operators with many years of development and management
experience in their respective markets. In each of these new markets, the
Company has established local offices containing separate operating divisions
staffed by experienced
S-14
<PAGE>
local operators. Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company will add an
additional 11 markets with property-level management in place. The Company would
also continue to employ substantially all of Crocker's senior property level
managers who are experienced with the real estate operations of the properties
and the local real estate market. The Company would also employ four of
Crocker's regional managers who will continue to serve the Company in that
capacity. With the addition of these key Crocker employees, the Company believes
that upon consummation of the Merger, approximately 85% of its portfolio will be
managed and leased on a day-to-day basis by personnel that have previously
managed, leased or developed the properties for which they are or will be
responsible. See "Recent Developments -- Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty
Trust, Inc."
FLEXIBLE AND CONSERVATIVE CAPITAL STRUCTURE. The Company is committed to
maintaining a flexible and conservative capital structure that: (i) will allow
it to grow through development and acquisition opportunities, (ii) provides the
Company access to the capital markets on favorable terms and (iii) promotes
future earnings growth.
Over the past year, the Company has concentrated on enhancing its financial
flexibility by improving its capital structure. The Company completed an equity
offering in August 1995 of 4,774,989 shares of Common Stock at a public offering
price of $24.50 per share, which raised net proceeds of approximately $110
million. Proceeds from the equity offering were used to pay down existing
indebtedness and repay interim debt. In March 1996, the Company expanded and
converted its $80 million secured line of credit to a $140 million unsecured
line of credit with NationsBank, First Union National Bank of North Carolina and
Wachovia Bank of North Carolina. In connection with the Merger, the Company has
obtained a commitment from NationsBank and First Union National Bank of North
Carolina to replace the current line of credit with a new $250 million unsecured
facility. See "Recent Developments -- Financing Activities and Liquidity." The
Company believes that these efforts as well as the Offering demonstrate the
Company's intention to maintain a flexible and conservative capital structure.
After giving effect to the Merger and this Offering, the Company's total debt to
total market capitalization will be approximately 37%.
EFFICIENT, CUSTOMER SERVICE-ORIENTED REGIONAL ORGANIZATION. The Company
provides a complete line of real estate services to its tenants and third
parties. The Company believes that its in-house development, acquisition,
construction management, leasing, brokerage and management services allow it to
respond to the many demands of its existing and potential tenant base, and
enable it to provide its tenants cost effective services such as build-to-suit
construction and space modification, including tenant improvements and
expansions. In addition, the breadth of the Company's capabilities and
resources, particularly its in-house leasing and third-party brokerage services,
provides it with market information not generally available and gives the
Company increased access to development, acquisition and management
opportunities. The Company believes that the operating efficiencies achieved
through its fully integrated organization also provide a competitive advantage
in setting its lease rates and pricing other services.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
PENDING ACQUISITION OF CROCKER REALTY TRUST, INC.
GENERAL. On April 29, 1996, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Crocker Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland
corporation ("Crocker"). As a result of the Merger, Highwoods will acquire 58
suburban office properties and 12 service center properties (the "Crocker
Properties") located in 15 Southeastern markets in Florida, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia and Alabama. The Crocker Properties
encompass 5.7 million rentable square feet and, at March 31, 1996, were 95%
leased. For a description of the properties to be acquired in the Merger, see
"Business and Properties -- The Crocker Properties."
Through the Merger, the Company will establish itself as one of the largest
real estate operating companies in the Southeastern United States, specializing
in the ownership, management, acquisition and development of suburban office and
industrial properties. Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company will have
offices in North Carolina's three major markets, the Research Triangle, the
Piedmont Triad and Charlotte; as well as in Richmond, Virginia; Nashville and
Memphis, Tennessee; and Tampa and Boca Raton, Florida. Following the Merger, the
Company will own 160 suburban office properties and 110 industrial (including 74
service center) properties (the "Properties"), totaling 15.9 million rentable
square feet. At March 31, 1996, the Properties were 94% leased. The Company
believes that the Merger provides Highwoods a unique investment opportunity for
future growth by allowing the Company to expand and diversify its operations to
growth-oriented markets throughout the Southeast. Seventeen of the Crocker
Properties are located in existing Company markets, and the Company's
substantial real estate experience in these markets should allow for management
and operational cost savings due to economies of scale. In addition, the Crocker
transaction
S-15
<PAGE>
enhances the Company's opportunities to engage in single accretive acquisitions
and developments in each of the Company's markets due to the inherent cost
savings of previously established local real estate management and
infrastructure.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company will acquire all of
the outstanding capital stock of Crocker in exchange for a cash payment of
$11.02 per share, subject to certain adjustments. Based on Crocker's 26,981,087
million shares of outstanding capital stock at May 31, 1996, the purchase price
will total approximately $297 million. In addition, the Company will cash out
certain existing options and warrants to purchase Crocker common stock for an
estimated $4.2 million and assume approximately $240 million of Crocker's
currently outstanding indebtedness, having a weighted average interest rate of
8.6%. In connection with the Merger, the Company has also entered into a Stock
Purchase Agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with AP CRTI Holdings, L. P.
(an affiliate of Apollo Real Estate Advisors), AEW Partners, L.P. (an investment
partnership advised by Aldrich Eastman Waltch), and Crocker's three senior
executives (Thomas J. Crocker, Richard S. Ackerman and Robert E. Onisko), who
together own approximately 83% of Crocker's outstanding common stock
(collectively, the "Crocker Selling Stockholders"), which obligates such
stockholders to sell their shares to the Company at a cash price of $11.02,
subject to the same adjustments as required under the Merger Agreement. The
approximately $247 million purchase price of such shares is part of the total
approximately $297 million purchase price for all of Crocker's outstanding
shares.
As part of the Merger, for a period of one year following the closing, the
Company has agreed to provide all employees of Crocker who continue with the
Company with cash compensation and employee benefits at least equal to what was
in existence at the closing date. In addition, for a period of six years
following the closing, the Company has agreed to provide officers and directors
of Crocker with indemnification coverage and liability insurance at the same
level as existed prior to the Merger.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement,
the right of the Company, Crocker or the Crocker Selling Stockholders to
terminate the respective agreements is generally limited to the following: (i)
the failure of Crocker to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Code;
(ii) the failure of Crocker's stockholders to approve the Merger; (iii) the
failure to obtain the consent to the transaction by certain of Crocker's
lenders; (iv) Crocker's failure to comply with its covenants to continue to
operate the business prior to the Merger within certain specified parameters;
and (v) the existence of any order, judgement, decree, injunction or ruling of a
court of competent jurisdiction restraining, enjoining or prohibiting
consummation of the Merger. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the
Crocker Selling Stockholders have agreed and granted irrevocable proxies to the
Company, to vote in favor of the Merger. As a result, either through the
acquisition of the Crocker Selling Stockholders' stock in Crocker or through
exercise of the proxy, the Company can assure that Crocker's stockholders will
approve the Merger. Under Maryland law, Crocker's stockholders do not have
dissenters' rights in connection with the Merger Agreement and the consummation
of the transactions contemplated thereby. Furthermore, the consummation of the
Merger Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement by the Company is not subject
to the approval of the Company's stockholders.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Crocker will distribute certain of
its assets and liabilities, which are not being acquired by the Company, to an
entity to be owned by all or a portion of Crocker's stockholders (the "Crocker
Distribution Entity"). The distributed assets comprise (i) approximately 258
acres of undeveloped land near or adjacent to certain of the Crocker Properties;
(ii) partnership interests in two office properties in which Crocker only holds
a partial joint venture interest; and (iii) rights under certain existing
contracts or letters of intent to purchase from third parties certain office
properties and undeveloped land (collectively, the "Excluded Assets"). The
Excluded Assets have a current book value of approximately $17.7 million. All
costs (including any tax liabilities) associated with the distribution of the
Excluded Assets will be borne by the Crocker Distribution Entity. The Crocker
Distribution Entity will also (i) assume the liability, if any, relating to
certain existing litigation involving one of Crocker's senior officers or will
agree to reimburse the Company for the costs of insuring in full any such
liability and (ii) enter into a lease agreement with Crocker that obligates it
to pay Crocker, as a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, a sum of $1.8
million over a two-year period following the consummation of the Merger.
The Crocker Distribution Entity will also bear certain of Crocker's costs
associated with the Merger. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, (i) the
Crocker Distribution Entity shall reimburse Crocker for the excess, if any, of
the Designated Transaction Expenses (as hereinafter defined) over $9,150,000 and
(ii) Crocker shall pay to the Crocker Distribution Entity 50% of the excess, if
any, of $8,600,000 over the Designated Transaction Expenses. "Designated
Transaction Expenses" shall mean expenses incurred by Crocker in connection with
its proposed public offering, which was terminated as a result of the Merger, or
in connection with the Merger Agreement and the Merger only in the
S-16
<PAGE>
following categories: (i) fees and expenses of legal counsel; (ii) fees and
expenses of accountants; (iii) fees and expenses of investment bankers and
appraisers; (iv) printing expenses; (v) severance payments to employees
(including officers); (vi) payments to Crocker's three senior executives in
connection with the release of certain stock options held by them; and (vii)
amounts due, if any, to any solicitation agent in connection with the exercise
of Crocker's outstanding public warrants, which will be cashed out by Highwoods
upon their exercise at a price equal to $1.02 per share (the difference between
their exercise price of $10.00 per share and the $11.02 per share merger
consideration), subject to adjustment for changes in the purchase price per
share of Crocker's common stock under the Merger Agreement.
MANAGEMENT OF CROCKER PROPERTIES. Upon completion of the Merger (or if
earlier, June 30, 1996), Crocker's three senior officers, Thomas J. Crocker,
Richard S. Ackerman and Robert E. Onisko, will resign as officers and directors
of Crocker. In connection with their resignation, they will receive certain
severance benefits, totaling in the aggregate, approximately $5.1 million, which
includes payments related to the cashing out of their respective stock options
and warrants. As part of the severance agreements, the three senior officers
have agreed not to compete with the Company within the city limits of Boca
Raton, Florida, for periods ranging from 12 months (Mr. Onisko) to 18 months
(Messrs. Crocker and Ackerman), except with respect to contracts that Mr.
Crocker has to manage certain office projects owned by third parties and with
respect to a mixed-use retail and office complex known as Mizner Park, which is
owned by Mr. Crocker. See "Risks Factors -- Risks Associated with Rapid Growth."
Following the consummation of the Merger, Highwoods will retain the
services of several key Crocker employees who will be responsible for managing a
significant portion of the Crocker Properties. Thomas F. Cochran will manage the
Company's business in Charlotte, North Carolina, Greenville, South Carolina, and
Atlanta, Georgia and will serve as vice president. Mr. Cochran served as senior
vice president for NationsBank from 1987 to 1993 where he was responsible for
development and asset management of 47 of the properties in the Crocker
portfolio. In 1993 he joined Patriot American Asset Management Corporation where
he was a senior vice president and managed the portfolio. He became senior vice
president with Crocker after the merger in 1995 between Crocker Realty
Investors, Inc., and Southeastern Realty Corp., which owned the 47 properties.
Michael E. Harris will manage the Company's business in the Memphis, Tennessee
area, and will serve as vice president. Mr. Harris joined Crocker in January
1996 in connection with Crocker's acquisition of a portfolio of properties owned
by Towermarc Corporation. While at Crocker, he managed the Memphis region. From
1981 to 1996, he served as senior vice president, general counsel and chief
financial officer of Towermarc Corporation where he developed and managed
approximately 2.0 million square feet of properties. Scott I. Peek, Jr. will
manage the Company's business in the Tampa, Orlando and Jacksonville, Florida
areas and will serve as vice president. Mr. Peek served as vice president with
Towermarc Corporation from 1992 to 1996 prior to Crocker's acquisition of
Towermarc's real estate holdings in January 1996. While with Towermarc, he was
responsible for the leasing, property management and development activities of
its Tampa and Jacksonville regions. After joining Crocker, he held a similar
role in the Tampa region. Timothy F. Vallace will manage the Boca Raton
division. Mr. Vallace has served as an assistant vice president at Crocker since
1993. His duties include asset management, leasing, construction management and
marketing for Crocker's Boca Raton operations.
SUBSIDIARIES OF CROCKER. Crocker holds the 70 Crocker Properties through
two partnerships and three corporations. Forty-six of the Crocker Properties are
held by AP Southeast Portfolio Partners, L.P. (the "Financing Partnership"), a
Delaware limited partnership that was formed on November 17, 1993 for the sole
purpose of acquiring such properties from NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A.,
as trustee for the NCNB Real Estate Fund. (See " -- Financing Activities and
Liquidity" for a description of the mortgage note that is secured by the 46
properties owned by the Financing Partnership.) AP Fontaine III Partners, L.P.
is a Delaware limited partnership formed on October 28, 1993 for the sole
purpose of acquiring one of the Crocker Properties. Neither partnership has
employees and their activities are carried out by Crocker and its subsidiaries.
Directly or indirectly, Crocker owns 100% of such partnerships. Three corporate
subsidiaries hold the remaining 23 Crocker Properties as follows: three are
owned by Crocker Realty Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation, 15 are owned by
CRT Florida Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation, and five are owned by CRT
Tennessee Holdings Corp., a Tennessee corporation.
Crocker conducts its property management business through Crocker Realty
Management, Inc. (the "Management Subsidiary"), a real estate operating company
specializing in development, construction management, property management and
leasing of office buildings and mixed-use properties. In addition to the Crocker
Properties, the Management Subsidiary currently manages approximately 2.2
million square feet of commercial property, 70% of which space (representing 83%
of Crocker's third-party revenue) is owned or managed by Thomas J. Crocker or
Richard S. Ackerman and which is not expected to be managed by the Company after
the Merger.
S-17
<PAGE>
TRANSACTION STRUCTURE. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Cedar
Acquisition Corporation ("Cedar"), a newly formed subsidiary of Highwoods, will
merge into Crocker with Highwoods becoming the sole shareholder of Crocker.
Highwoods intends to contribute the shares of common stock of Crocker to the
Operating Partnership in exchange for Units. As a result, Crocker would become a
subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. Except for the Federal and state income
taxes that might be payable upon the distribution of the Excluded Assets, which
taxes are to be paid by the Crocker Distribution Entity, the Merger has been
structured to defer any tax recognition to Crocker at the corporate or
subsidiary level. To accomplish this, the Company intends to maintain Crocker's
separate status as an operating REIT. To maintain Crocker's REIT status, the
Company intends to cause Crocker to sell a sufficient amount of common stock to
at least 110 individuals to enable Crocker to meet the test for qualification of
a REIT under Section 856(a)(5) of the Code. The aggregate amount of common stock
to be issued to such minority stockholders is not expected to exceed 1.0% of the
equity of Crocker. The Merger will be accounted for by the Company under the
purchase method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 16, "Business Combinations," as amended. Under this method of
accounting, the purchase price will be allocated to assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value at the closing date of
the Merger.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER. The Merger is a taxable
purchase of 100% of the outstanding stock of Crocker which will be taxable to
the selling stockholders of Crocker but, except as described below relative to
the Excluded Assets, will not be taxable at the Crocker corporate or subsidiary
level. The Company's tax basis in its Crocker stock will be equal to the total
cash it pays in the Merger for the Crocker stock, stock options and warrants. No
gain or loss will result to the Company from the Merger. Crocker, however, may
have corporate level taxable income and income tax liability due to the transfer
of the Excluded Assets to the Crocker Distribution Entity or the transfer of the
ownership interests in the Crocker Distribution Entity to some or all of the
Crocker stockholders. Any tax liabilities arising from the transactions related
to the Excluded Assets or the Crocker Distribution Entity will be borne by the
Crocker Distribution Entity. Following the Merger, the Company will transfer all
of the stock of Crocker to the Operating Partnership in exchange for Units and
the settlement of certain intercompany indebtedness that was used to finance the
Merger. This transaction will be a nontaxable transfer of property to a
partnership in exchange for ownership interests in the partnership. The
Company's tax basis in the Units so acquired will be equal to its tax basis in
the Crocker stock transferred to the Operating Partnership, and no gain or loss
will be realized by Crocker, the Company or the Operating Partnership as a
result of this transaction.
The Company expects Crocker at all times to maintain its status as a REIT.
As discussed in "Transaction Structure" above, Crocker or the Company will sell
shares of Crocker common stock to individuals sufficient for Crocker to meet the
REIT qualification requirement of 100 stockholders. Crocker and the Company also
intend that Crocker will continue to be organized and operated so as to maintain
its qualification as a REIT. Since the ownership of Crocker stock by the
Operating Partnership is considered to be the ownership of a real estate asset
for purposes of the REIT qualification tests and since distributions received
from a REIT are income included in both the 95% and 75% income tests of Code
Sections 856(c)(2) and (3), the Company's qualification as a REIT should not be
affected by the acquisition and ownership of Crocker. If, however, Crocker fails
to qualify as a REIT for any reason while its shares are owned by the Company or
the Operating Partnership, the Company will no longer qualify as a REIT and the
Company would be taxed as if it were a domestic corporation and its stockholders
would be taxed in the same manner as stockholders of ordinary corporations. In
that event, the Company could be subject to potentially significant tax
liabilities and, therefore, the amount of cash available for distribution to its
stockholders would be substantially reduced or eliminated. See "Risk
Factors -- Risk of Failure of Crocker to Qualify as a REIT."
The Company believes, and Crocker has represented, that commencing with
Crocker's taxable year ended December 31, 1995, Crocker has operated in such a
manner so as to meet the Code requirements for qualification as a REIT.
Crocker's qualification as a REIT is a condition to the Company's obligation to
consummate the Merger.
EAKIN & SMITH TRANSACTION
On April 1, 1996, the Company completed a merger with Eakin & Smith and its
affiliates ("Eakin & Smith") combining their property portfolios, management
teams and business operations. Through the combination, the Company succeeded to
the ownership of seven suburban office buildings totaling 848,000 square feet, a
103,000-square-foot suburban office development project, 18 acres of development
land and Eakin & Smith's brokerage and property management operations. All the
properties and development land are located in Nashville, Tennessee. At March
31, 1996, the properties acquired in the transaction were 97% leased.
S-18
<PAGE>
The aggregate cost to the Company of the Eakin & Smith Transaction,
assuming the completion of the in-process development project, was approximately
$98.5 million payable through the issuance of 537,138 limited partnership units
of the Operating Partnership and 489,421 shares of Common Stock, the assumption
of $37 million of indebtedness (with a weighted average fixed rate of 8.0%), and
cash payments of approximately $33 million. The cost excludes deferred payments
of up to 54,056 shares of Common Stock, which are attributable to Eakin &
Smith's brokerage and property management operation. A total payment of 13,514
shares of Common Stock will be made to the three principals of Eakin & Smith,
Inc. for each of the first four 12-month periods following the combination in
which third-party service revenue attributable to the Eakin & Smith brokerage
and property management operations exceeds $2,000,000.
As part of the Eakin & Smith Transaction, the three principals of Eakin &
Smith, Inc. received options to purchase 105,000 shares of common stock at
$27.50 per share. Such options vest in four equal annual installments beginning
with the second anniversary of the date of grant. Such principals also received
warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock for $28.00 per share. In
addition, John W. Eakin and Thomas S. Smith were added to the Company's Board of
Directors. The third principal, W. Brian Reames, has also remained with the
Company.
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
The following table summarizes the three development projects placed in
service by the Company during 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RENTABLE INITIAL
PROPERTY PROPERTY TYPE LOCATION SQUARE FEET COST
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Hewlett Packard Office Piedmont Triad 15,000 $ 1,000,000
Global Software Office Research Triangle 92,700 7,500,000
Regency One Industrial Piedmont Triad 127,600 3,500,000
Total 235,300 $12,000,000
</TABLE>
The Company has eight suburban office properties and one industrial
property under development totaling 791,000 square feet of space. The following
table summarizes these projects:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
RENTABLE ESTIMATED PERCENT COMPLETION
OFFICE PROPERTIES LOCATION SQUARE FEET COST PRELEASED DATE
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MSA Research Triangle 57,000 $ 6,200,000 100% 4Q96
Healthsource Research Triangle 180,000 14,400,000 100 4Q96
One Shockoe Plaza Richmond 118,000 15,000,000 100 4Q96
Highwoods One Richmond 126,000 12,500,000 0 4Q96
Situs One Research Triangle 58,000 5,100,000 58 4Q96
Maryland Way Nashville 103,000 11,500,000 50 4Q96
Inacom Piedmont Triad 13,000 900,000 100 4Q96
North Park Research Triangle 40,000 4,000,000 40 1Q97
Total or Weighted Average 695,000 $69,600,000 67%
<CAPTION>
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Regency Two Piedmont Triad 96,000 $ 2,800,000 39% 4Q96
Total or Weighted Average 791,000 $72,400,000 66%
</TABLE>
S-19
<PAGE>
Following the Merger, the Company will continue Crocker's development of an
approximately 81,000-square foot office building in Center Point Office Park in
Columbia, South Carolina. Crocker owns the other office building in the park,
which building was 100% leased at March 31, 1996. The total cost of the project
is expected to be approximately $7.6 million, including the purchase of the
land. Pursuant to a contract entered into with the contractor, the construction
costs are fixed. The building is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter
of 1996 and is approximately 50% pre-leased.
OTHER PENDING ACQUISITIONS
The Company has entered into agreements to acquire two suburban office
properties: one in Richmond, Virginia and the other in Nashville, Tennessee. The
properties encompass 155,000 square feet in the aggregate and will be acquired
at a total cost of $15.3 million. The purchase price will be funded through a
$10.4 million cash payment and the assumption of a $4.9 million, 8.75%
non-recourse mortgage loan. Additionally, the Company has entered into a letter
of intent to acquire two suburban office properties totaling 224,000 square feet
and three acres of land in Nashville and Charlotte in exchange for 305,438 Units
and $5.7 million in cash.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES AND LIQUIDITY
Set forth below is a summary description of the Company's recent financing
activities:
CREDIT FACILITY. In March 1996, the Company closed on a $140 million
unsecured credit facility (the "Credit Facility"), which replaced an $80 million
secured facility. The Credit Facility is with NationsBank, First Union National
Bank of North Carolina and Wachovia Bank of North Carolina and requires monthly
payment of interest and matures on September 30, 1999. The initial interest rate
on the Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 150 basis points. The interest rate will
adjust based on the Company's senior unsecured credit rating within a range of
LIBOR plus 100 basis points to LIBOR plus 175 basis points. The replacement of
the secured facility with the Credit Facility enhanced the Company's financial
flexibility by releasing the liens on 24 properties with a book value of
approximately $226 million.
FINANCING OF THE EAKIN & SMITH TRANSACTION. The Company financed the Eakin
& Smith Transaction through the issuance of 537,138 Units of the Operating
Partnership and 489,421 shares of Common Stock, the assumption of $37.0 million
of mortgage indebtedness and a $26.6 million draw on the Credit Facility. The
mortgage indebtedness assumed has an average fixed rate of approximately 8% and
an average remaining life of approximately six years. Approximately $5.5 million
of the mortgage indebtedness is fixed at a rate of 7.7% to the maturity date of
the underlying debt through the use of an interest rate swap. Further, the
Company entered into a five-year, $7.0 million interest rate swap agreement that
commences in January 1997 and effectively fixes $7.0 million of the Company's
variable rate debt at 8.0%.
FINANCING OF THE PENDING MERGER. In connection with the Merger, the Company
obtained a commitment from NationsBank and First Union National Bank of North
Carolina for a $250 million revolving line of credit (the "Revolving Loan"). The
Revolving Loan will replace the Credit Facility and will be used together with
the proceeds from the Offering to fund the Merger.
The Revolving Loan will be unsecured for the first nine months and will
bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 150 basis points. After the initial
nine-month period, the Revolving Loan will either convert to a secured loan with
a maturity date two years from its closing date or to an unsecured loan maturing
on July 31, 1999. The Revolving Loan will remain unsecured if the Company
generates at least $300 million of net proceeds from equity offerings (including
the proceeds from this Offering) during the initial nine-month period and meets
the following financial covenants:
S-20
<PAGE>
(i) adjusted net operating income divided by total liabilities of not less than
16.5%; (ii) total liabilities not greater than 45% of market capitalization;
(iii) tangible net worth of not less than $700 million, which amount shall be
increased by not less than 85% of the net proceeds of any future offerings of
the Company's capital stock (including this Offering); (iv) a ratio of total
liabilities to total assets at cost of no more than .50 to 1.0; (v) a ratio of
earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization to interest
expense plus capital expenditures of not less than 2.5 to 1.0; (vi) a ratio of
unencumbered assets to unsecured debt of not less than 2.25 to 1.0; (vii) a
ratio of secured debt to total assets of not more than .30 to 1.0; (viii) a
ratio of adjusted net operating income as derived from unencumbered assets to
interest expense paid on unsecured debt of not less than 2.25 to 1.0; and (ix) a
ratio of adjusted net operating income derived from unencumbered assets to
unsecured debt of not less than .18 to 1.0.
If the Revolving Loan remains unsecured after the initial nine-month
period, it would have an interest rate that ranged from LIBOR plus 100 basis
points to LIBOR plus 175 basis points based on the Company's senior unsecured
credit rating. If the loan converts to a secured facility, the Company will be
required to pledge assets at least equal in value to 60% of the outstanding
amount of the Revolving Loan and the interest rate will equal LIBOR plus 175
basis points.
Also in connection with the Merger, the Company will assume approximately
$239.5 million of indebtedness at an average rate of 8.57%. This indebtedness
includes: (i) a $140 million mortgage note (the "Mortgage Note") with a fixed
rate of 7.9% (ii) variable rate mortgage loans in the aggregate amount of $69.4
million with a weighted average interest rate of 9.4% at March 31, 1996 and
(iii) fixed rate mortgage loans in the amount of $30.1 million with a weighted
average interest rate of 9.8%.
The Mortgage Note is a conventional, monthly pay, first mortgage note in
the principal amount of $140 million issued by the Financing Partnership. The
Mortgage Note is a limited recourse obligation of the Financing Partnership as
to which, in the event of a default under the Indenture or the Mortgage,
recourse may be had only against the specific 46 Properties (the "Mortgage Note
Properties") and other assets that have been pledged as security therefor. The
Mortgage Note was issued to Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corporation I pursuant to
an Indenture, dated March 1, 1994 (the "Indenture"), among the Financing
Partnership, Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A., and Bankers Trust
Company.
The Mortgage Note bears interest on its outstanding principal balance at
the rate of 7.88% per annum, subject to increase in the event of a default in
the payment of any amount due, and matures on January 3, 2001. The Mortgage Note
provides for scheduled monthly payments of interest only, which are due on the
first business day of each calendar month.
The Mortgage Note is secured by a blanket, first mortgage lien on the
Mortgage Note Properties (the "Mortgage"). The Mortgage Note is further secured
by (i) a first priority assignment of all present and future leases encumbering
portions of those Properties, (ii) a security interest in any personal property
owned by Financing Partnership and (iii) a collateral assignment of the right,
title and interest of the Financing Partnership in and rights to all management
agreements relating to those Properties. As an additional security for the
Mortgage Note, the Financing Partnership maintains with the Banker's Trust
Company various "sweep accounts," a central cash collateral account (the "Cash
Collateral Account") and a contingency reserve account (the "Contingency Reserve
Account"). All rents with respect to the Mortgage Note Properties are made
payable to, and deposited directly in, the sweep accounts, which are then
transferred to the Cash Collateral Account, and all other property income and
capital event proceeds are deposited into the Cash Collateral Account promptly
upon receipt thereof. Cash of at least $7 million (the "Contingency Reserve") is
maintained in the Contingency Reserve Account.
The Indenture provides for a lockout period which prohibits optional
redemption payments in respect of principal of the Mortgage Note (other than the
premium-free redemption payment described below) prior to November 22, 1998.
Thereafter, the Financing Partnership may make optional redemption payments in
respect of principal of the Mortgage Note on any distribution date, subject to
the payment of a yield maintenance charge in connection with such payments made
prior to August 1, 2000. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Financing
Partnership may be required to make payments in respect of the principal of the
Mortgage Note in certain limited circumstances and the Financing Partnership has
a one-time right, exercisable at any time during the term of the Mortgage Note,
to make the premium-free redemption payment in a principal amount not to exceed
$7 million, without any applicable yield maintenance charges.
S-21
<PAGE>
Covenants in the Indenture restrict the Financing Partnership from, among
other things, engaging in any business or activity other than that in connection
with or relating to the ownership and operation of the Mortgage Note Properties,
incurring, creating or assuming any indebtedness or encumbrance other than the
Mortgage Note and as otherwise expressly permitted under the Indenture, or
liquidating or dissolving or entering into any consolidation or merger. The
Indenture also restricts the Financing Partnership's right to terminate any of
its leases, and requires the Financing Partnership to maintain or cause the
tenants to maintain specified insurance coverage, including rental loss
insurance covering annual gross rentals net of noncontinuing expenses for a
period of not less than two years.
Under the terms of the purchase agreement relating to the Mortgage Note
Properties, the Financing Partnership may be obligated to pay NationsBank a
deferred contingent purchase price. This contingent payment, which will in no
event exceed $4.4 million, is due on April 1, 1998 if the actual four-year
cumulative cash flow of such Properties exceeds the projected four-year
cumulative cash flow. Based on Crocker's estimates of future operations, the
Company does not believe that any deferred contingent purchase price will be
payable.
The Company is currently considering various alternatives related to the
$99.5 million of indebtedness to be assumed in the Merger other than the
Mortgage Note. The Company may repay this indebtedness with the proceeds from
the issuance of either senior unsecured debt or conventional mortgage debt. To
limit its exposure to increasing interest rates, the Company has entered into a
forward-starting $75 million interest rate swap agreement that commences on
September 15, 1996. The interest rate swap matures on September 15, 2003 and
will limit the Company's exposure to increases in interest rates on either $75
million of LIBOR based floating rate borrowings or $75 million of fixed rate
debt issued in the future. Upon commencement of the interest rate swap, the
Company will pay the counterparty a fixed rate of 7.02% while the counterparty
will pay the Company an amount equal to 30-day LIBOR.
PRO FORMA CAPITALIZATION. Assuming completion of the Offering and the
Merger, the Company's pro forma debt as of March 31, 1996 would have totaled
$550.3 million and would have represented 37% of total market capitalization
(based on a stock price of $27 3/8). The Company's pro forma interest coverage
ratio (defined as income before minority interest plus depreciation and
amortization and interest expense divided by contractual interest expense) for
the quarter ended March 31, 1996 would have equaled 2.86x.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES
On May 20, 1996 the Company announced certain changes to its organizational
structure, which will allow the Company to utilize its existing senior
management for overall leadership while taking advantage of certain members of
Crocker's management to integrate Crocker into the Highwoods organization. These
changes will provide property and market specific experience to the combined
portfolio. The Company believes that upon the completion of the Merger,
approximately 85% of its portfolio will be managed and leased on a day-to-day
basis by personnel that have previously managed, leased or developed the
properties for which they are responsible.
In connection with the organizational changes, William T. Wilson, III was
appointed to the newly created position of executive vice president and chief
operating officer. Mr. Wilson will assume responsibility for all aspects of the
Company's divisional operations and the Company's acquisition group. Prior to
this appointment, he served as executive vice president and was responsible for
the operations of the Forsyth division, which included the operations of the
Piedmont Triad and Charlotte area properties. John E. Reece II will assume Mr.
Wilson's responsibilities with respect to the Piedmont Triad area properties and
will serve the Company as a vice president. Mr. Reece was previously responsible
for the leasing, marketing and development activities of the Forsyth division.
In addition, John W. Eakin has been appointed as senior vice president and will
be responsible for operations in Tennessee (Nashville and Memphis), Alabama and
Florida (Tampa, Boca Raton, Orlando and Jacksonville). Since joining the Company
in April 1996 in connection with the Eakin & Smith Transaction, Mr. Eakin has
been reponsible for the Company's Nashville operations.
Upon completion of the Merger, Messrs. Cochran, Harris, Peek and Vallace
will join the Company from Crocker as vice presidents with specific regional
responsibility. See " -- Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty Trust, Inc."
USE OF PROCEEDS
The net proceeds to the Company from the sale of Common Stock offered
hereby (the "Offering") are expected to be approximately $258.4 million
(approximately $297.2 million if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is
exercised in full), assuming an offering price of $27 3/8 (the closing price of
the Common Stock on the NYSE on June 17, 1996).
S-22
<PAGE>
The Company intends to use the net cash proceeds of the Offering to fund a
portion of the purchase price of all of the outstanding shares of Crocker, the
balance of which is expected to be funded with borrowings under the Revolving
Loan.
Pending such uses, the net proceeds may be invested in short-term income
producing investments such as commercial paper, government securities or money
market funds that invest in government securities.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTION HISTORY
The Common Stock has been traded on the NYSE under the symbol "HIW" since
its initial public offering in June 1994. The following table sets forth the
high and low closing sales prices per share reported on the NYSE for the periods
indicated and the distributions paid per share for each such period.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLOSING PRICE
PER SHARE
PERIOD OR QUARTER HIGH LOW
<S> <C> <C>
June 7, 1994 through June 30, 1994........................................................... $ 21 1/2 $ 19 7/8
July 1, 1994 through September 30, 1994...................................................... 21 20
October 1, 1994 through December 31, 1994.................................................... 21 5/8 18 3/4
January 1, 1995 through March 31, 1995....................................................... 22 20
April 1, 1995 through June 30, 1995.......................................................... 25 1/2 21 1/4
July 1, 1995 through September 30, 1995...................................................... 26 7/8 23 7/8
October 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995.................................................... 28 3/8 25 1/2
January 1, 1996 through March 31, 1996....................................................... 30 1/2 27 3/4
April 1, 1996 through June 19, 1996.......................................................... 30 1/4 27 3/8
<CAPTION>
DISTRIBUTIONS
PERIOD OR QUARTER PER SHARE
<S> <C>
June 7, 1994 through June 30, 1994........................................................... $.075(1)
July 1, 1994 through September 30, 1994...................................................... .425
October 1, 1994 through December 31, 1994.................................................... .425
January 1, 1995 through March 31, 1995....................................................... .425
April 1, 1995 through June 30, 1995.......................................................... .450
July 1, 1995 through September 30, 1995...................................................... .450
October 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995.................................................... .450
January 1, 1996 through March 31, 1996....................................................... .450
April 1, 1996 through June 17, 1996.......................................................... (2)
</TABLE>
(1) No distribution was paid during this period. The accrued distribution of
$.075 per share was paid on November 16, 1994 at the time the Company paid
its initial distribution for the period from inception to September 30,
1994.
(2) On June 3, 1996, the Company's Board of Directors declared a quarterly
distribution of $.48 per share ($1.92 on an annualized basis) payable on
August 21, 1996, to stockholders of record on August 9, 1996.
On June 19, 1996, the last reported sale price of the Common Stock on the
NYSE was $27 3/8 per share. On May 31, 1996, the Company had 521 stockholders of
record.
The Company intends to continue to declare quarterly distributions on its
Common Stock. However, no assurances can be given as to the amounts of future
distributions as such distributions are subject to the Company's cash flow from
operations, earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and such other
factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. The Company has determined
that 100% of the per share distribution for 1994 and 93% of the per share
distribution for 1995 represented ordinary income to the stockholders for income
tax purposes. No assurance can be given that such percentage will not change in
future years.
The Company has adopted a program for the reinvestment of distributions
under which holders of Common Stock may elect automatically to reinvest
distributions in additional Common Stock. The Company may, from time to time,
repurchase Common Stock in the open market for purposes of fulfilling its
obligations under this distribution reinvestment program or may elect to issue
additional Common Stock.
S-23
<PAGE>
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Company as of
March 31, 1996 and on a pro forma basis assuming (i) the issuance of the
10,000,000 shares of Common Stock offered hereby and the anticipated use of the
net proceeds thereof as described under "Use of Proceeds" and (ii) the Eakin &
Smith Transaction and the Merger had occurred as of March 31, 1996. The
information set forth in the table should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the notes thereto incorporated herein by reference and
the pro forma financial information and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this Prospectus Supplement and the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto incorporated by reference into the accompanying Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 31, 1996
HISTORICAL PRO FORMA
<S> <C> <C>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Debt:
Mortgages and notes payable...................................................................... $ 175,218 $ 451,747
Credit Facility.................................................................................. 21,500 98,564
Minority interest in Operating Partnership......................................................... 73,440 88,212
Shareholders' Equity:
Common Stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 authorized; 19,407,641 and 29,897,062 respectively,
issued and outstanding (1).................................................................... 194 299
Additional paid-in capital....................................................................... 355,248 627,022
Distributions in excess of net earnings.......................................................... (2,933) (2,933)
Total shareholders' equity.................................................................... 352,509 624,388
Total capitalization.......................................................................... $ 622,667 $1,262,911
</TABLE>
(1) Excludes (a) 3,732,452 (historical) and 4,269,590 (pro forma) shares of
Common Stock that may be issued upon redemption of Units (which are
redeemable by the holder for cash or, at the Company's option, shares of
Common Stock on a one-for-one basis) issued in connection with the formation
of the Company and subsequent property acquisitions, (b) 890,500 shares of
Common Stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of options granted pursuant
to the Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan, (c) 250,000 shares of
Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of warrants granted to
certain officers in connection with certain property acquisitions, (d)
40,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon redemption of Units
that may be issued in connection with certain property acquisitions and (e)
54,056 shares of Common Stock that may be issued in connection with the
Eakin & Smith Transaction.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating information
for the Company on a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 1995 and as
of and for the three months ended March 31, 1996. The following table also sets
forth selected financial and operating information on an historical basis for
the Company for the period from June 14, 1994 (commencement of operations) to
December 31, 1994, for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for the three months
ended March 31, 1996 and 1995. The following information should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto incorporated by
reference herein and the pro forma financial statements and notes thereto
included and incorporated by reference herein.
The pro forma operating data for the year ended December 31, 1995 assumes
that the Forsyth Transaction, the Research Commons Acquisition, the Other
Acquisitions, the Second Offering, the Third Offering, the Eakin & Smith
Transaction, the Merger and this Offering all occurred as of January 1, 1995.
The pro forma balance sheet as of March 31, 1996 assumes that this Offering, the
Eakin & Smith Transaction and the Merger all occurred on March 31, 1996. The pro
forma operating data for the three months ended March 31, 1996 assumes that this
Offering, the Eakin & Smith Transaction and the Merger occurred as of January 1,
1995.
The pro forma information is based upon certain assumptions that are
included in the notes to the pro forma financial statements incorporated by
reference herein and the pro forma financial statements included elsewhere in
this Prospectus Supplement. The pro forma financial information is unaudited and
is not necessarily indicative of what the
S-24
<PAGE>
financial position and results of operations of the Company would have been as
of and for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to represent the future
financial position and results of operations for future periods.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HISTORICAL
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA JUNE 14,
THREE MONTHS ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED 1994 TO
MARCH 31, MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1996 1995 1995 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA:
Total revenue................. $ 45,850 $ 23,757 $ 12,846 $172,142 $ 73,522 $ 19,442
Rental property operating
expenses.................... 13,437(1) 6,154(2) 3,053(2) 46,225(1) 17,049(2) 5,110(2)
General and administrative.... 1,284 934 523 4,218 2,737 810
Interest expense.............. 11,660 3,951 2,470 47,806 13,720 3,220
Depreciation and
amortization................ 6,755 3,716 1,921 26,587 11,082 2,607
Income (loss) before minority
interest.................... 12,714 9,002 4,879 47,306 28,934 7,695
Minority interest............. (1,589) (1,571) (800) (5,913) (4,937) (808)
Income before extraordinary
item........................ 11,125 7,431 4,079 41,393 23,997 6,887
Extraordinary item-loss on
early extinguishment of
debt........................ -- -- (875) -- (875) (1,273)
Net income (loss)............. $ 11,125 $ 7,431 $ 3,204 $ 41,393 $ 23,122 $ 5,614
Net income per common share... $ .37 $ 0.38 $ 0.29 $ 1.38 $ 1.49 $ .63
BALANCE SHEET DATA
(AT END OF PERIOD):
Real estate, net of
accumulated depreciation.... $1,225,525 $602,276 $429,556 $ -- $593,066 $207,976
Total assets.................. 1,288,157 632,644 455,909 -- 621,134 224,777
Total mortgages and notes
payable..................... 550,311 196,718 140,698 -- 182,736 66,864
OTHER DATA:
Number of in-service
properties.................. 268 191 108 -- 191 44
Total rentable square feet.... 15,727,000 9,211,000 6,914,000 -- 9,215,171 2,746,219
</TABLE>
(1) Rental property operating expenses include salaries, real estate taxes,
insurance, repairs and maintenance, property management, security,
utilities, leasing, development, and construction expenses.
(2) Rental property operating expenses include salaries, real estate taxes,
insurance, repairs and maintenance, property management, security and
utilities.
S-25
<PAGE>
BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
GENERAL
The Company owns 102 suburban office properties and 98 industrial
properties (the "Highwoods Properties"), which are located in the Research
Triangle, the Piedmont Triad and Charlotte, North Carolina; Nashville,
Tennessee; and Richmond, Virginia. The Company's office properties are mid-rise
and single-story suburban office buildings. Its industrial properties include 36
warehouse and bulk distribution facilities and 62 service center properties. The
Company's service center properties are generally at least 50% office finish and
are suitable for office, retail, light industrial and warehouse uses. One
hundred and eighty-three of the Highwoods Properties are in 31 business parks,
12 of which were developed by the Company. In the aggregate, the Company
developed 88 of the Highwoods Properties. The Company provides management and
leasing services for 191 of its 200 properties. See " -- The Highwoods
Properties."
Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company will own an additional 58
suburban office properties and 12 service center properties (the "Crocker
Properties"). The Crocker Properties are in 15 markets in Florida, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia and Alabama, including
four markets in which the Company owns properties (Charlotte, the Research
Triangle and the Piedmont Triad, North Carolina and Nashville, Tennessee).
Sixty-three of the Crocker Properties are located in business parks. See
" -- The Crocker Properties."
The following table sets forth certain information about the Highwoods
Properties and Crocker Properties (collectively, the "Properties") at March 31,
1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUALIZED RENTAL REVENUE (1)
OFFICE INDUSTRIAL
PROPERTIES PROPERTIES (2) TOTAL
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ $ 86,585,628 $ 16,053,429 $102,639,057
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 58,467,277 8,919,366 67,386,643
Total..................................................................... $145,052,905 $ 24,972,795 $170,025,700
<CAPTION>
RENTABLE SQUARE FEET
OFFICE INDUSTRIAL
PROPERTIES PROPERTIES (2) TOTAL
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ 6,389,737 3,674,951 10,064,688
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 4,449,739 1,212,084 5,661,823
Total..................................................................... 10,839,476 4,887,035 15,726,511
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT LEASED
INDUSTRIAL
OFFICE PROPERTIES WEIGHTED
PROPERTIES (2) AVERAGE
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ 95%(3) 91%(4) 94%
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 95(5) 93(6) 95
Weighted average.......................................................... 95% 92% 94%
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE AGE (YEARS)(7)
INDUSTRIAL
OFFICE PROPERTIES WEIGHTED
PROPERTIES (2) AVERAGE
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Properties........................................................ 10.4 9.2(8) 10.2
Crocker Properties.......................................................... 8.9 11.2 9.2
Weighted Average (5)...................................................... 9.8 9.7 9.8
</TABLE>
(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is March 1996 rental revenue (base rent plus
operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
(2) Includes 74 service center properties, 12 of which are Crocker Properties.
(3) Includes 23 single-tenant properties comprising 1.5 million rentable square
feet and 61,000 rentable square feet leased but not occupied.
S-26
<PAGE>
(4) Includes 17 single-tenant properties comprising 1.0 million rentable square
feet and 27,000 rentable square feet based but not occupied.
(5) Includes 13 single-tenant properties comprising 861,000 rentable square feet
and 68,000 rentable square feet leased but not occupied.
(6) Includes three single-tenant properties comprising 258,000 rentable square
feet and 14,000 square feet leased but not occupied.
(7) Weighted according to Annualized Rental Revenue.
(8) Excludes Ivy Distribution Center. Ivy is a 400,000-rentable square foot
warehouse, which was constructed in stages. A portion of the building was
built in 1930; major expansions took place in the mid-1940s, mid-1950s and
1981. In 1989, the entire property was renovated to convert it from a
manufacturing facility to a warehouse.
PROPERTY LOCATIONS
Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company will own properties in 16
markets located in the Southeastern United States (the "Company Markets"). The
following table sets forth certain information about the Properties in each of
the Company Markets at March 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF
OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TOTAL TOTAL RENTABLE TOTAL RENTABLE ANNUALIZED
PROPERTIES PROPERTIES PROPERTIES SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET RENTAL REVENUE
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Research Triangle, NC......... 61 4 65 4,078,229 25.9% $ 53,994,987
Piedmont Triad, NC............ 23 78 101 4,296,563 27.3 27,684,440
Nashville, TN................. 7 3 10 1,192,511 7.6 15,095,578
Tampa, FL..................... 20 -- 20 1,155,483 7.4 14,170,231
Charlotte, NC................. 12 16 28 1,253,847 8.0 13,088,036
Boca Raton, FL................ 3 -- 3 506,834 3.2 9,682,756
Greenville, SC................ 5 2 7 687,150 4.4 7,501,621
Memphis, TN................... 5 -- 5 382,131 2.4 7,232,995
Richmond, VA.................. 10 1 11 481,908 3.1 5,284,603
Atlanta, GA................... 2 3 5 706,745 4.5 4,948,214
Columbia, SC.................. 5 -- 5 318,713 2.0 4,011,072
Orlando, FL................... 2 -- 2 200,796 1.3 2,011,534
Birmingham, AL................ 1 -- 1 111,905 0.7 1,632,892
Norfolk, VA................... 1 1 2 179,006 1.1 1,481,603
Jacksonville, FL.............. 1 -- 1 50,513 0.3 1,104,854
Asheville, NC................. 1 1 2 124,177 0.8 1,100,284
Total.................. 159 109 268 15,726,511 100.0% $170,025,700
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF TOTAL
ANNUALIZED
RENTAL REVENUE
<S> <C>
Research Triangle, NC......... 31.8%
Piedmont Triad, NC............ 16.3
Nashville, TN................. 8.9
Tampa, FL..................... 8.3
Charlotte, NC................. 7.7
Boca Raton, FL................ 5.7
Greenville, SC................ 4.4
Memphis, TN................... 4.2
Richmond, VA.................. 3.1
Atlanta, GA................... 2.9
Columbia, SC.................. 2.4
Orlando, FL................... 1.2
Birmingham, AL................ 1.0
Norfolk, VA................... 0.9
Jacksonville, FL.............. 0.6
Asheville, NC................. 0.6
Total.................. 100.0%
</TABLE>
S-27
<PAGE>
TENANTS
The Properties are leased to approximately 1700 tenants, which engage in a
wide variety of businesses including computers, healthcare, telecommunications,
finance, insurance and electronics. The following table sets forth information
concerning the 20 largest tenants of the Properties as of March 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF TOTAL
NUMBER ANNUALIZED ANNUALIZED
TENANT PORTFOLIO (1) OF LEASES RENTAL REVENUE (2) RENTAL REVENUE (2)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1. Federal Government
Environmental Protection Agency...................... H 4 $ 4,482,619 2.6%
U.S. Army and Marine Corps........................... H 2 243,473 0.1
National Institute of Health Sciences................ H 1 165,394 0.1
Other................................................ H 2 77,427 0.1
9 $ 4,968,913 2.9%
2. IBM Corporation...................................... H,C 6 4,459,722 2.6
3. First Citizens Bank & Trust.......................... H 7 2,766,733 1.6
4. Pharmacy Management Services, Inc.................... C 2 2,166,482 1.3
5. International Paper Company.......................... H,C 3 2,023,997 1.2
6. Jacobs-Sirrine Engineers, Inc........................ C 1 1,801,694 1.1
7. MCI Telecommunications............................... C 2 1,488,024 0.9
8. Volvo................................................ H,C 4 1,419,396 0.8
9. AT&T................................................. H,C 9 1,382,118 0.8
10. Duke University...................................... H 5 1,378,797 0.8
11. Sears, Roebuck & Company............................. H 4 1,364,841 0.8
12. Kraft Company........................................ C 3 1,356,166 0.8
13. GTE Data Services, Inc............................... C 2 1,325,769 0.8
14. Clintrials of North Carolina......................... H 4 1,294,525 0.8
15. Blue Cross of SC..................................... C 5 1,224,072 0.7
16. Commonwealth of Virginia Government.................. H 2 1,194,000 0.7
17. Glaxo Wellcome....................................... H 3 1,193,100 0.7
18. The Kroger Company................................... H 1 1,115,250 0.7
19. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan........................ H 3 1,082,798 0.6
20. Southern National Bank H 2 1,071,889 0.6
Total................................................ 77 $ 36,078,286 21.2%
</TABLE>
(1) H=Highwoods and C=Crocker.
(2) Annualized Rental Revenue is March 1996 rental revenue (base rent plus
operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
S-28
<PAGE>
LEASE EXPIRATIONS OF THE PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations for leases in
place at the Properties as of March 31, 1996, for each of the next 10 years
beginning with March 31, 1996, assuming no tenant exercises renewal options or
is terminated due to default:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE OF
RENTABLE TOTAL LEASED PERCENTAGE OF
SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET ANNUALIZED TOTAL ANNUALIZED
NUMBER SUBJECT TO REPRESENTED BY RENTAL REVENUE RENTAL REVENUE
OF LEASES EXPIRING EXPIRING UNDER EXPIRING REPRESENTED BY
LEASE EXPIRING EXPIRING LEASES LEASES LEASES (1) EXPIRING LEASES
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996........................................... 408 2,592,163 17.6% $ 20,120,539 11.8%
1997........................................... 403 2,415,113 16.4 26,593,887 15.7
1998........................................... 378 2,386,835 16.2 29,079,769 17.1
1999........................................... 277 1,758,632 12.0 21,298,294 12.5
2000........................................... 255 2,162,057 14.7 26,854,838 15.8
2001........................................... 109 1,256,866 8.6 18,772,349 11.0
2002........................................... 47 887,028 6.0 10,602,121 6.2
2003........................................... 26 554,628 3.8 8,268,658 4.9
2004........................................... 11 131,507 0.9 1,914,110 1.1
2005........................................... 13 342,121 2.3 3,168,389 1.9
2006 and thereafter............................ 8 216,228 1.5 3,352,746 2.0
Total.......................................... 1,935 14,703,178 100.0% $170,025,700 100.0%
</TABLE>
(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is March 1996 rental revenue (base rent plus
operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
THE HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
OFFICE PROPERTIES. The Company's portfolio of office properties consists of
102 suburban office buildings. As of March 31, 1996, the office properties were
95% leased and totaled approximately 6.4 million rentable square feet.
Ninety-one of the office properties are located in 19 developed business parks.
All of the office properties have sufficient on-site parking for a fully
occupied facility. The Company's office properties are close to major highways
and suburban business centers, providing tenants with easy access to hotels,
restaurants, shopping centers and other amenities. The office properties have an
average age (weighted by Annualized Rental Revenue) of 10.4 years.
The following tables set forth certain leasing information (on a per
rentable square foot basis) for the office properties owned by the Company for
the three month-period ended March 31, 1996:
NET EFFECTIVE RENTS RELATED TO RE-LEASED OFFICE SPACE
AT THE HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES (1)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of lease transaction (signed leases)................................................ 58
Rentable square footage leased............................................................. 130,312
Average per rentable square foot over the lease term:
Base rent (2)............................................................................ $ 16.21
Tenant improvements...................................................................... (1.49)
Leasing commissions...................................................................... (0.35)
Rent concessions......................................................................... --
Effective rent (3)....................................................................... $ 14.37
Expense stop (4)......................................................................... (4.23)
Equivalent effective net rent (5)........................................................ $ 10.14
Average term in years...................................................................... 4
</TABLE>
(1) Does not include the seven Properties in Nashville, Tennessee acquired in
the Eakin & Smith Transaction on April 1, 1996.
S-29
<PAGE>
(2) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period, divided by the terms in months for
such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the total rentable square feet
leased under all lease transactions during the period.
(3) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period minus all tenant improvements and
leasing commissions from all lease transactions during the period, divided
by the terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the
total rentable square feet leased under all lease transactions during the
period.
(4) Equals the amount of real estate taxes, operating costs and utility costs
that the landlord is obligated to pay on an annual basis. The tenant is
required to pay any increases above such amount.
(5) Equals effective rent minus expense stop.
RENTAL RATE TRENDS FOR HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES (1)
(OFFICE ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of leases commenced during period.................................................... 58
Average final rate with expense pass throughs............................................... $15.20
Average first year cash rental rate......................................................... $15.75
Percentage increase......................................................................... 3.62%
</TABLE>
(1) Does not include the seven properties in Nashville, Tennessee acquired in
the Eakin & Smith Transaction on April 1, 1996.
The following table sets forth the capital expenditures committed by the
Company under signed leases for tenant improvements and lease commissions for
re-leased office space owned by the Company for the three-month period ended
March 31, 1996:
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES RELATED TO RE-LEASED HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES (1)
(OFFICE ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Tenant improvements:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $723,053
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 130,312
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 5.55
Leasing commissions:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $156,264
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 130,312
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 1.20
Total:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $879,317
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 130,312
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 6.75
</TABLE>
(1) Does not include the seven properties in Nashville, Tennessee acquired in
the Eakin & Smith Transaction on April 1, 1996.
S-30
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations for leases for
the Company's office properties in place as of March 31, 1996, for each of the
10 years beginning with March 31, 1996, assuming no tenant exercises renewal
options or is terminated due to default:
LEASE EXPIRATIONS OF HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
(OFFICE ONLY)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE
PERCENTAGE OF ANNUALIZED
RENTABLE TOTAL LEASED RENTAL REVENUE PERCENTAGE OF
SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET ANNUALIZED PER SQUARE TOTAL ANNUALIZED
NUMBER SUBJECT TO REPRESENTED BY RENTAL REVENUE FOOT UNDER RENTAL REVENUE
OF LEASES EXPIRING EXPIRING UNDER EXPIRING EXPIRING REPRESENTED BY
LEASE EXPIRING EXPIRING LEASES LEASES LEASES (1) LEASES EXPIRING LEASES
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Remainder of 1996............ 161 497,975 8.3% $ 6,645,478 $13.35 7.7%
1997......................... 177 908,552 15.1 12,851,425 14.14 14.8
1998......................... 164 1,162,561 19.3 15,513,976 13.34 17.9
1999......................... 114 717,269 11.9 10,149,965 14.15 11.7
2000......................... 144 1,094,813 18.1 15,441,058 14.10 17.8
2001......................... 56 754,483 12.5 11,924,532 15.80 13.8
2002......................... 20 292,113 4.8 4,648,493 15.91 5.4
2003......................... 13 364,610 6.0 5,816,399 15.95 6.7
2004......................... 7 75,581 1.3 1,085,352 14.36 1.3
2005......................... 5 30,491 0.5 503,488 16.51 0.6
Thereafter................... 6 133,755 2.2 2,005,462 14.99 2.3
Total or average............. 867 6,032,203 100.0% $ 86,585,628 $14.35 100.0%
</TABLE>
(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is March 1996 rental revenue (base rent plus
operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES. The Company's portfolio includes 98 industrial
properties. Ninety-three of these properties are located in 18 business or
industrial parks. All of the Company's industrial properties have excellent
access to interstate highway systems. As of March 31, 1996, the industrial
properties were 91% leased and totaled approximately 3.7 million rentable square
feet.
Thirty-six of the industrial properties, comprising approximately 2.8
million rentable square feet, are warehouse and bulk distribution facilities
serving the storage and regional distribution needs of manufacturers and
distribution companies. The Company's warehouse and distribution facilities are
designed for bulk storage of materials and manufactured goods in buildings with
interior heights typically of 20 feet or more and office build-out of generally
25% or less. All of the Company's distribution facilities have dock facilities
for trucks as well as grade level loading for lighter vehicles and vans. Each of
the Company's warehouse and distribution facilities is equipped with sprinkler
systems.
Sixty-two of the Company's industrial properties, comprising approximately
1.0 million rentable square feet, are service center buildings, which are
adaptable for a variety of uses, including office, light industrial, warehouse,
distribution, assembly, research and development and retail. The service center
properties have varying amounts of office finish (from 5% to 97%) and their
rents vary accordingly. The service centers are frequently leased in units of
2,000 to 15,000 square feet and offer users interior heights of 14 feet or more
for storage with grade level loading doors. Many provide dock facilities as
well.
The following tables set forth certain leasing information (on a per
rentable square foot basis) for the Company's industrial properties for the
three-month period ended March 31, 1996:
S-31
<PAGE>
NET EFFECTIVE RENTS RELATED TO RE-LEASED
INDUSTRIAL SPACE AT THE HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of lease transaction (signed leases)............................................... 73
Rentable square footage leased............................................................ 669,007
Average per rentable square foot over the lease term:
Base rent (1)........................................................................... $ 4.55
Tenant improvements..................................................................... (0.18)
Leasing commissions..................................................................... (0.08)
Rent concessions........................................................................ --
Effective rent (2)...................................................................... $ 4.29
Expense stop (3)........................................................................ (0.31)
Equivalent effective net rent (4)....................................................... $ 3.98
Average term in years..................................................................... 2
</TABLE>
(1) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period, divided by the terms in months for
such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the total rentable square feet
leased under all lease transactions during the period.
(2) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period minus all tenant improvements and
leasing commissions from all lease transactions during the period, divided
by the terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the
total rentable square feet leased under all lease transactions during the
period.
(3) Equals the amount of real estate taxes, operating costs and utility costs
that the landlord is obligated to pay on an annual basis. The tenant is
required to pay any increases above such amount.
(4) Equals effective rent minus expense stop.
RENTAL TRENDS FOR HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
(INDUSTRIAL ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of leases commenced during period...................................................... 69
Average final rate with expense pass throughs................................................. $4.45
Average first year cash rental rate........................................................... $4.66
Percentage increase........................................................................... 4.72%
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the capital expenditures committed by the
Company under signed leases for tenant improvements and lease commissions for
re-leased industrial space during the three-month period ended March 31, 1996:
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES RELATED TO RE-LEASED HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
(INDUSTRIAL ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Tenant improvements:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $456,808
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 669,007
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 0.68
Leasing commissions:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $158,537
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 669,007
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 0.24
Total:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $615,345
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 669,007
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 0.92
</TABLE>
S-32
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations for leases in
place at the Company's industrial properties as of March 31, 1996, for each of
the 10 years beginning with March 31, 1996, assuming no tenant exercises renewal
options or is terminated on account of tenant defaults:
LEASE EXPIRATIONS OF HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
(INDUSTRIAL ONLY)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE
PERCENTAGE OF ANNUALIZED
RENTABLE TOTAL LEASED RENTAL REVENUE PERCENTAGE OF
SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET ANNUALIZED PER SQUARE TOTAL ANNUALIZED
NUMBER SUBJECT TO REPRESENTED BY RENTAL REVENUE FOOT UNDER RENTAL REVENUE
OF LEASES EXPIRING EXPIRING UNDER EXPIRING EXPIRING REPRESENTED BY
LEASE EXPIRING EXPIRING LEASES LEASES LEASES (1) LEASES EXPIRING LEASES
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Remainder of 1996............ 156 1,553,489 46.4% $ 6,715,994 $ 4.32 41.8%
1997......................... 90 607,743 18.2 3,090,728 5.09 19.3
1998......................... 86 328,357 9.8 2,225,222 6.78 13.9
1999......................... 50 217,180 6.5 1,234,631 5.68 7.7
2000......................... 20 311,315 9.3 1,499,486 4.82 9.3
2001......................... 6 43,702 1.3 311,911 7.14 1.9
2002......................... 2 257,210 7.7 766,355 2.98 4.8
2003......................... 1 3,375 0.1 18,428 5.46 0.1
2004......................... -- -- 0.0 -- -- --
2005......................... 4 23,450 0.7 190,674 8.13 1.2
Thereafter................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Total or average............. 415 3,345,821 100.0% $ 16,053,429 $ 4.80 100.0%
</TABLE>
(1) Includes operating expense pass throughs and excludes the effect of future
contractual rent increases.
THE CROCKER PROPERTIES
The Crocker Properties consist of 58 suburban office buildings and 12
service center properties located in 15 metropolitan areas in seven states in
the Southeastern United States encompassing a total of approximately 5.7 million
rentable square feet. Sixty-three of the properties are located in suburban
office parks and comprise approximately 4.7 million square feet of rentable
space. The remaining seven properties are also located in suburban areas in the
Southeast.
The Crocker Properties were developed between 1980 and 1991 and have a
weighted average age of nine years. The majority of the Crocker Properties were
acquired by Crocker or its predecessors in 1993, near the end of a downturn in
commercial real estate markets that resulted from the over-building of the
1980s. Most of the Crocker Properties are used for more than one business
activity. The Crocker Properties are similar in quality to that of the Highwoods
Properties. They are primarily of brick or concrete construction, having one to
ten stories, with lush landscaped areas and sufficient parking for their
intended use. The Crocker Properties are well maintained and strategically
located near transportation corridors. All of the Crocker Properties have been
inspected by independent engineers since September 1993 and are in good to
excellent physical condition. Other than regular maintenance operations and
routine tenant improvements, the Company does not anticipate the necessity of
undertaking any significant renovation or construction projects at any of the
Crocker Properties in the near term. Certain of the Crocker Properties are
encumbered by mortgage indebtedness. See "Recent Developments -- Financing
Activities and Liquidity."
Management of the Crocker Properties is supervised by Crocker's asset
managers in regional offices. On-site management is conducted by Crocker at 54
of its Properties. Highwoods intends to retain substantially all of Crocker's
on-site managers following the Merger and to reduce the reliance on third-party
property managers and leasing agents with respect to the Crocker Properties.
OFFICE PROPERTIES. The Crocker portfolio of office properties consists of
58 suburban office buildings. As of March 31, 1996, the office properties were
95% leased and totaled approximately 4.2 million rentable square feet. Fifty-one
of the office properties are located in developed business parks. All of the
office properties have sufficient on-site parking
S-33
<PAGE>
for a fully occupied facility. The office properties have an average age
(weighted by Annualized Rental Revenue) of 8.9 years.
The following tables set forth certain leasing information (on a per
rentable square foot basis) for the office properties owned by Crocker for the
three month-period ended March 31, 1996:
NET EFFECTIVE RENTS RELATED TO RE-LEASED OFFICE SPACE
AT THE CROCKER PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of lease transaction (signed leases) (1)........................................... 16
Rentable square footage leased............................................................ 128,907
Average per rentable square foot over the lease term:
Base rent (2)........................................................................... $ 13.19
Tenant improvements..................................................................... (0.33)
Leasing commissions..................................................................... (0.36)
Rent concessions........................................................................ --
Effective rent (3)...................................................................... $ 12.50
Expense stop (4)........................................................................ (1.95)
Equivalent effective net rent (5)....................................................... $ 10.54
Average term in years..................................................................... 2
</TABLE>
(1) Includes the exercise of a one-year lease renewal by IBM for 68,500 square
feet at ONCC -- "W" building in the Research Triangle Park.
(2) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period, divided by the terms in months for
such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the total rentable square feet
leased under all lease transactions during the period.
(3) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period minus all tenant improvements and
leasing commissions from all lease transactions during the period, divided
by the terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the
total rentable square feet leased under all lease transactions during the
period.
(4) Equals the amount of real estate taxes, operating costs and utility costs
that the landlord is obligated to pay on an annual basis. The tenant is
required to pay any increases above such amount.
(5) Equals effective rent minus expense stop.
RENTAL RATE TRENDS FOR CROCKER PROPERTIES
(OFFICE ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of leases commenced during period.................................................... 7
Average final rate with expense pass throughs............................................... $14.84
Average first year cash rental rate......................................................... $16.21
Percentage increase......................................................................... 9.23%
</TABLE>
S-34
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the capital expenditures committed by
Crocker under signed leases for tenant improvements and lease commissions for
re-leased office space owned by Crocker for the three-month period ended March
31, 1996:
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES RELATED TO RE-LEASED CROCKER PROPERTIES
(OFFICE ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Tenant improvements:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $180,538
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 128,907
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 1.40
Leasing commissions:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $116,847
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 128,907
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 0.91
Total:
Total dollars committed under signed leases............................................. $297,385
Rentable square feet.................................................................... 128,907
Per rentable square foot................................................................ $ 2.31
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations for leases for
Crocker's office properties in place as of March 31, 1996, for each of the 10
years beginning with March 31, 1996, assuming no tenant exercises renewal
options or is terminated due to default:
LEASE EXPIRATIONS OF CROCKER PROPERTIES
(OFFICE ONLY)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE
PERCENTAGE OF ANNUALIZED
RENTABLE TOTAL LEASED RENTAL REVENUE PERCENTAGE OF
SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET ANNUALIZED PER SQUARE TOTAL ANNUALIZED
NUMBER SUBJECT TO REPRESENTED BY RENTAL REVENUE FOOT UNDER RENTAL REVENUE
OF LEASES EXPIRING EXPIRING UNDER EXPIRING EXPIRING REPRESENTED BY
LEASE EXPIRING EXPIRING LEASES LEASES LEASES (1) LEASES EXPIRING LEASES
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Remainder of 1996............. 71 389,110 9.3% $ 5,605,984 $14.41 9.6%
1997.......................... 111 668,690 16.0 8,790,584 13.15 15.0
1998.......................... 106 726,341 17.4 9,880,076 13.60 16.9
1999.......................... 89 562,977 13.5 8,062,666 14.32 13.8
2000.......................... 75 502,275 12.0 7,903,807 15.74 13.5
2001.......................... 39 382,806 9.1 5,952,787 15.55 10.2
2002.......................... 25 337,705 8.1 5,187,273 15.36 8.9
2003.......................... 12 186,643 4.4 2,433,831 13.04 4.2
2004.......................... 4 55,926 1.3 828,758 14.82 1.4
2005.......................... 4 288,180 6.9 2,474,227 8.59 4.2
Thereafter.................... 2 82,473 2.0 1,347,284 16.34 2.3
Total or average.............. 538 4,183,126 100.0% $ 58,467,277 $13.98 100.0%
</TABLE>
(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is March 1996 rental revenue (base rent plus
operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
THE SERVICE CENTER PROPERTIES. The Crocker portfolio includes 12 service
center properties. All of these properties are located in business or industrial
parks. All of the Crocker service center properties have excellent access to
interstate highway systems. As of March 31, 1996, the service center properties
were 93% leased and totaled approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet.
S-35
<PAGE>
The Crocker service center properties are adaptable for a variety of uses,
including office, light industrial, warehouse, distribution, assembly, research
and development and retail. The service center properties have varying amounts
of office finish (from 10% to 70%) and their rents vary accordingly. The service
centers are frequently leased in units of 2,000 to 15,000 square feet and offer
users interior heights of 14 feet or more for storage with grade level loading
doors. Many provide dock facilities as well. All of the service centers have
sufficient on-site parking for a fully occupied facility.
The following tables set forth certain leasing information (on a per
rentable square foot basis) for the Crocker service center properties for the
three-month period ended March 31, 1996:
NET EFFECTIVE RENTS RELATED TO RE-LEASED
SERVICE CENTER SPACE AT THE CROCKER PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of lease transaction (signed leases)................................................ 7
Rentable square footage leased............................................................. 50,413
Average per rentable square foot over the lease term:
Base rent (1)............................................................................ $ 6.12
Tenant improvements...................................................................... (0.34)
Leasing commissions...................................................................... (0.12)
Rent concessions......................................................................... --
Effective rent (2)....................................................................... $ 5.66
Expense stop (3)......................................................................... (0.34)
Equivalent effective net rent (4)........................................................ $ 5.32
Average term in years...................................................................... 3
</TABLE>
(1) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period, divided by the terms in months for
such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the total rentable square feet
leased under all lease transactions during the period.
(2) Equals aggregate base rent received over their respective terms from all
lease transactions during the period minus all tenant improvements and
leasing commissions from all lease transactions during the period, divided
by the terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12, divided by the
total rentable square feet leased under all lease transactions during the
period.
(3) Equals the amount of real estate taxes, operating costs and utility costs
that the landlord is obligated to pay on an annual basis. The tenant is
required to pay any increases above such amount.
(4) Equals effective rent minus expense stop.
RENTAL TRENDS FOR CROCKER PROPERTIES
(SERVICE CENTER ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number of leases commenced during period...................................................... 3
Average final rate with expense pass throughs................................................. $6.72
Average first year cash rental rate........................................................... $7.49
Percentage increase........................................................................... 11.46%
</TABLE>
S-36
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the capital expenditures committed by
Crocker under signed leases for tenant improvements and lease commissions for
re-leased industrial space during the three-month period ended March 31, 1996:
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES RELATED TO RE-LEASED CROCKER PROPERTIES
(SERVICE CENTER ONLY)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Tenant improvements:
Total dollars committed under signed leases........................................... $79,512.90
Rentable square feet.................................................................. 50,413
Per rentable square foot.............................................................. $ 1.58
Leasing commissions:
Total dollars committed under signed leases........................................... $10,878.25
Rentable square feet.................................................................. 50,413
Per rentable square foot.............................................................. $ 0.22
Total:
Total dollars committed under signed leases........................................... $90,391.15
Rentable square feet.................................................................. 50,413
Per rentable square foot.............................................................. $ 1.79
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations for leases in
place at Crocker's service center properties as of March 31, 1996, for each of
the 10 years beginning with March 31, 1996, assuming no tenant exercises renewal
options or is terminated on account of tenant defaults:
LEASE EXPIRATIONS OF CROCKER PROPERTIES
(SERVICE CENTER ONLY)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE
PERCENTAGE OF ANNUALIZED
RENTABLE TOTAL LEASED RENTAL REVENUE PERCENTAGE OF
SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET ANNUALIZED PER SQUARE TOTAL ANNUALIZED
NUMBER SUBJECT TO REPRESENTED BY RENTAL REVENUE FOOT UNDER RENTAL REVENUE
OF LEASES EXPIRING EXPIRING UNDER EXPIRING EXPIRING REPRESENTED BY
LEASE EXPIRING EXPIRING LEASES LEASES LEASES (1) LEASES EXPIRING LEASES
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Remainder of 1996............. 20 151,589 12.9% $1,153,083 $ 7.61 13.3%
1997.......................... 25 230,128 20.9 1,861,150 8.09 20.2
1998.......................... 22 169,576 16.4 1,460,495 8.61 14.8
1999.......................... 24 261,206 20.8 1,851,032 7.09 22.9
2000.......................... 16 253,654 22.5 2,010,487 7.93 22.2
2001.......................... 8 75,875 6.5 583,119 7.69 6.6
2002.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
2003.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
2004.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
2005.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Thereafter.................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Total or average.............. 115 1,142,028 100.0% $8,919,366 $ 7.81 100.0%
</TABLE>
(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is March 1996 rental revenue (base rent plus
operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
S-37
<PAGE>
TABLE OF PROPERTIES
The following table and the notes thereto set forth information regarding
the Properties at March 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
<CAPTION>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
RESEARCH TRIANGLE, NC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
HIGHWOODS OFFICE CENTER
Amica O 1983 20,708 100% 87% 100%
Arrowood O 1979 58,743 100 100 100
Aspen O 1980 36,666 87 87 100
Birchwood O 1983 12,748 100 100 100
Cedar East O 1981 39,904 100 100 100
Cedar West O 1981 39,903 95 95 100
Cottonwood O 1983 40,150 100 100 100
Cypress O 1980 39,004 100 100 100
Dogwood O 1983 40,613 100 100 100
Hawthorn O 1987 63,797 100 100 100
Highwoods Tower O 1991 185,222 99 98 100
Holly O 1984 20,186 100 100 100
Ironwood O 1978 35,695 96 96 100
Kaiser O 1988 56,915 100 100 100
Laurel O 1982 39,382 100 100 100
Leatherwood O 1979 36,581 99 96 100
Smoketree Tower O 1984 151,703 82 82 100
REXWOODS OFFICE CENTER
2500 Blue Ridge O 1982 61,864 100 100 100
Blue Ridge II O 1988 20,673 100 100 100
Rexwoods Center O 1990 41,686 100 100 100
Rexwoods II O 1993 20,845 100 100 100
Rexwoods III O 1992 42,484 100 100 100
Rexwoods IV O 1995 42,003 76 76 100
TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTER
Bldg. 2A O 1984 102,400 98 98 90
Bldg. 2B S 1984 32,000 100 100 50
Bldg. 3 O 1988 135,360 96 96 80
Bldg. 7 O 1986 126,728 78 78 95
PROGRESS CENTER
Cape Fear O 1979 40,058 32 32 100
Catawba O 1980 37,456 100 100 100
CompuChem O 1980 105,540 100 100 100
NORTH PARK
4800 North Park O 1985 168,016 100 100 100
4900 North Park O 1984 32,002 97 83 100
5000 North Park O 1980 75,395 83 83 100
CREEKSTONE PARK
Creekstone Crossing O 1990 59,299 92 88 96
Riverbirch O 1987 59,971 100 100 100
Willow Oak O 1995 88,783 92 92 100
RESEARCH COMMONS
EPA Administration O 1966 46,718 100 100 100
EPA Annex O 1966 145,875 100 100 50
4501 Bldg. O 1985 56,566 100 100 100
4401 Bldg. O 1987 115,526 84 84 93
4301 Bldg. O 1989 90,894 100 100 27
4201 Bldg. O 1991 83,731 100 100 100
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
<S> <C>
RESEARCH TRIANGLE, NC
<S> <C>
HIGHWOODS OFFICE CENTER
Amica Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Arrowood First Citizens Bank & Trust
Aspen N/A
Birchwood Donohoe Construction Company,
Southlight, Inc.
Cedar East Amerimark Building Products
Cedar West N/A
Cottonwood First Citizens Bank & Trust
Cypress GSA-Army Recruiters
Dogwood First Citizens Bank & Trust
Hawthorn Carolina Telephone
Highwoods Tower Maupin, Taylor, Ellis & Adams
Holly Capital Associated Industries
Ironwood First Citizens Bank & Trust
Kaiser Kaiser Foundation
Laurel Microspace Communications, First
Citizens Bank & Trust
Leatherwood GAB North America, Inc.
Smoketree Tower N/A
REXWOODS OFFICE CENTER
2500 Blue Ridge Rex Hospital, Inc.
Blue Ridge II McGladrey & Pullen
Rexwoods Center N/A
Rexwoods II Raleigh Neurology Clinic (2),
Miller Building Corporation
Rexwoods III Piedmont Olsen Hensley, Inc.
Rexwoods IV N/A
TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTER
Bldg. 2A Harris Corporation, AAI Systems
Management, Inc.
Bldg. 2B International Paper
Bldg. 3 N/A
Bldg. 7 Broadband Technologies, Inc.
PROGRESS CENTER
Cape Fear N/A
Catawba GSA -- EPA
CompuChem CompuChem (3)
NORTH PARK
4800 North Park IBM-PC Division
4900 North Park N/A
5000 North Park N/A
CREEKSTONE PARK
Creekstone Crossing N/A
Riverbirch Digital Equipment Corporation,
Quintiles, Inc.
Willow Oak AT&T Corporation
RESEARCH COMMONS
EPA Administration Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Annex Environmental Protection Agency
4501 Bldg. Martin Marietta
4401 Bldg. Ericsson
4301 Bldg. Glaxo Wellcome Inc. (4)
4201 Bldg. Environmental Protection Agency
</TABLE>
S-38
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
HOCK PORTFOLIO
Fairfield I O 1987 50,540 92% 92% 100%
Fairfield II O 1989 61,064 90 90 100
Qualex O 1985 67,000 100 100 100
4101 Roxboro O 1984 56,000 100 100 100
4020 Roxboro O 1989 40,000 100 100 100
SIX FORKS CENTER
Six Forks Center I O 1982 33,867 100 100 100
Six Forks Center II O 1983 55,603 94 94 100
Six Forks Center III O 1987 60,662 99 99 100
OTHER RESEARCH TRIANGLE
PROPERTIES
Colony Corporate Center O 1985 53,324 100 100 100
Concourse O 1986 131,645 99 99 100
Expressway One Warehouse I 1990 59,600 100 100 5
Holiday Inn O 1984 30,000 100 100 100
Lake Plaza East O 1984 71,254 97 97 100
Phoenix O 1990 26,449 91 91 100
South Square I O 1988 56,401 100 100 100
South Square II O 1989 58,793 100 100 100
Cotton Building O 1972 40,035 100 100 79
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 3,702,030 95% 95%
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
<S> <C>
HOCK PORTFOLIO
Fairfield I Reliance
Fairfield II Qualex
Qualex Qualex
4101 Roxboro Duke -- Cardiology
4020 Roxboro Duke -- Pediatrics
Duke -- Cardiology
SIX FORKS CENTER
Six Forks Center I Centura Bank
Six Forks Center II N/A
Six Forks Center III EDS
OTHER RESEARCH TRIANGLE
PROPERTIES
Colony Corporate Center Rust Environmental &
Infrastructure, Fujitsu
Concourse Clintrials
Expressway One Warehouse West's Durham Transfer & Storage
Holiday Inn Holiday Inns, Inc.
Lake Plaza East N/A
Phoenix N/A
South Square I Blue Cross and Blue Shield
South Square II Coastal Healthcare Group, Inc.
Cotton Building Cotton Inc., Associated Insurances
Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PIEDMONT TRIAD, NC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AIRPARK EAST
Highland Industries S 1990 12,500 100 100 48
Service Center 1 S 1985 18,575 86 86 96
Service Center 2 S 1985 18,672 100 100 94
Service Center 3 S 1985 16,498 86 86 97
Service Center 4 S 1985 16,500 100 100 100
Copier Consultants S 1990 20,000 100 100 60
Service Court S 1990 12,600 75 75 100
Bldg. 01 O 1990 24,423 100 100 100
Bldg. 02 O 1986 23,827 100 100 100
Bldg. 03 O 1986 23,182 100 100 100
Bldg. A O 1986 56,272 85 85 100
Bldg. B O 1988 54,088 93 93 100
Bldg. C O 1990 134,893 100 100 100
Sears Cenfact O 1989 49,504 100 100 100
Hewlett Packard O 1996 15,000 76 76 100
Warehouse 1 I 1985 64,000 100 100 21
Warehouse 2 I 1985 64,000 88 88 48
Warehouse 3 I 1986 57,600 100 100 8
Warehouse 4 I 1988 54,000 100 100 89
AIRPARK NORTH
DC-1 I 1986 112,000 100 100 7
DC-2 I 1987 111,905 100 100 61
DC-3 I 1988 75,000 100 100 5
DC-4 I 1988 60,000 100 100 8
AIRPARK WEST
Airpark I O 1984 60,000 100 100 100
Airpark II O 1985 45,680 100 0 100
Airpark IV O 1985 22,612 100 87 100
Airpark V O 1985 21,923 100 100 100
Airpark VI O 1985 22,097 94 94 100
<CAPTION>
PIEDMONT TRIAD, NC
<S> <C>
AIRPARK EAST
Highland Industries Highland Industries, Inc. (5)
Service Center 1 Genetic Design
Service Center 2 Genetic Design
Service Center 3 ECPI
Service Center 4 Genetic Design
Copier Consultants Copier Consultants
Service Court Genetic Design
Bldg. 01 Health & Hygiene
Bldg. 02 United States Postal Service
Bldg. 03 Time Warner, Martin Marietta
Bldg. A N/A
Bldg. B Hewlett-Packard Co., United States
Postal Service
Bldg. C John Hancock
Sears Cenfact Sears Roebuck & Company
Hewlett Packard Hewlett Packard Co.
Warehouse 1 Guilford Business Forms, Inc.,
Safelite Glass Corp.
Warehouse 2 Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corp., State
Street Bank Realty
Warehouse 3 US Air Inc., Garlock, Inc.
Warehouse 4 First Data Resources, Inc.
AIRPARK NORTH
DC-1 VSA, Inc.
DC-2 Sears Roebuck & Co., Summit Pet
Products Dist. Inc., Electric
South
DC-3 Fashions Outlet of America, Inc.,
Continuous Forms & Checks, Inc.
DC-4 RSVP Communications, Inc.
AIRPARK WEST
Airpark I Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corp.
Airpark II Mohawk Carpet Corporation
Airpark IV Max Radio of Greensboro
Airpark V NCR Corporation
Airpark VI Brookstone College, Anacomp
</TABLE>
S-39
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
WEST POINT BUSINESS PARK
BMF Warehouse I 1986 240,000 100% 100% 3%
WP-11 I 1988 89,600 36 36 8
WP-12 I 1988 89,600 100 100 4
WP-13 I 1988 89,600 100 100 2
WP-3 & 4 S 1988 18,059 100 100 54
WP-5 S 1995 25,200 76 76 20
Fairchild Bldg. I 1990 89,000 100 100 20
LUWA Bahnson Bldg. O 1990 27,000 100 100 100
UNIVERSITY COMMERCIAL CENTER
W-1 I 1983 44,400 100 100 1
W-2 I 1983 46,500 100 100 7
SR-1 S 1983 23,112 100 100 68
SR-2 01/02 S 1983 17,282 100 100 67
SR-3 S 1984 23,825 65 65 70
Bldg. 01/02 O 1983 9,993 51 51 100
Bldg. 03 O 1985 37,077 71 71 100
Bldg. 04 O 1986 34,470 60 60 100
IVY DISTRIBUTION CENTER (6) I 1930- 400,000 57 57 2
1980
KNOLLWOOD OFFICE CENTER
370 Knollwood O 1994 90,315 100 100 100
380 Knollwood O 1990 164,141 97 97 100
STONELEIGH BUSINESS PARK
7327 W. Friendly Ave. S 1987 11,180 100 100 59
7339 W. Friendly Ave. S 1989 11,784 100 100 59
7341 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 21,048 100 100 36
7343 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 13,463 100 100 36
7345 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 12,300 100 100 36
7347 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 17,978 100 100 36
7349 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 9,840 100 100 36
7351 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 19,723 100 100 36
7353 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 22,826 100 100 36
7355 W. Friendly Ave. S 1988 13,296 88 88 36
SPRING GARDEN PLAZA
4000 Spring Garden St. S 1983 21,773 74 74 69
4002 Spring Garden St. S 1983 6,684 100 100 69
4004 Spring Garden St. S 1983 23,724 83 83 69
POMONA CENTER -- PHASE I
7 Dundas Circle S 1986 14,760 91 91 55
8 Dundas Circle S 1986 16,488 100 100 55
9 Dundas Circle S 1986 9,972 100 100 55
POMONA CENTER -- PHASE II
302 Pomona Dr. S 1987 16,488 94 94 55
304 Pomona Dr. S 1987 4,344 75 75 55
306 Pomona Dr. S 1987 9,840 88 88 55
308 Pomona Dr. S 1987 14,184 96 96 55
5 Dundas Circle S 1987 14,184 83 83 55
WESTGATE ON WENDOVER -- PHASE I
305 South Westgate Dr. S 1985 5,760 83 83 54
307 South Westgate Dr. S 1985 12,672 100 100 54
309 South Westgate Dr. S 1985 12,960 100 44 54
311 South Westgate Dr. S 1985 14,400 100 100 54
315 South Westgate Dr. S 1985 10,368 89 89 54
317 South Westgate Dr. S 1985 15,552 100 100 54
319 South Westgate Dr. S 1985 10,368 100 100 54
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
<S> <C>
WEST POINT BUSINESS PARK
BMF Warehouse Sara Lee Knit Products, Inc.
WP-11 Microfibres
WP-12 Norel Plastics, Sara Lee
WP-13 Sara Lee Knit Products, Inc.
WP-3 & 4 Tri-Communications, Inc., Royso
Safety, Inc.
WP-5 N/A
Fairchild Bldg. Fairchild Industrial Products
LUWA Bahnson Bldg. Luwa Bahnson, Inc.
UNIVERSITY COMMERCIAL CENTER
W-1 Lagenthal Corp.
W-2 Paper Supply Company
SR-1 N/A
SR-2 01/02 Decision Point Marketing
SR-3 Decision Point Marketing
Bldg. 01/02 N/A
Bldg. 03 N/A
Bldg. 04 N/A
IVY DISTRIBUTION CENTER (6) N/A
KNOLLWOOD OFFICE CENTER
370 Knollwood Krispy Kreme, Prudential Carolinas
Realty
380 Knollwood N/A
STONELEIGH BUSINESS PARK
7327 W. Friendly Ave. American Telecom, Salem Imaging
7339 W. Friendly Ave. IKEA, R.F. Micro Devices
7341 W. Friendly Ave. R.F. Micro Devices
7343 W. Friendly Ave. Executone
7345 W. Friendly Ave. Disston
7347 W. Friendly Ave. Law Engineering, Winship
7349 W. Friendly Ave. N/A
7351 W. Friendly Ave. General Transport, Burlington Air
Express
7353 W. Friendly Ave. Office Equipment, Windsor Door
7355 W. Friendly Ave. R.F. Micro Devices
SPRING GARDEN PLAZA
4000 Spring Garden St. N/A
4002 Spring Garden St. Jordan Graphics
4004 Spring Garden St. N/A
POMONA CENTER -- PHASE I
7 Dundas Circle N/A
8 Dundas Circle N/A
9 Dundas Circle Netcom, Conservatop Corporation
POMONA CENTER -- PHASE II
302 Pomona Dr.
304 Pomona Dr. Fortune Personnel Consultants
306 Pomona Dr. AEL Defense Corporation
308 Pomona Dr. Hering North America
5 Dundas Circle
WESTGATE ON WENDOVER -- PHASE I
305 South Westgate Dr. Alarmguard, The Computer Store
307 South Westgate Dr. Anders Lufvenholm
309 South Westgate Dr. Network Information, McRae
Graphics
311 South Westgate Dr. N/A
315 South Westgate Dr. N/A
317 South Westgate Dr. N/A
319 South Westgate Dr. N/A
</TABLE>
S-40
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
WESTGATE ON WENDOVER -- PHASE II
206 South Westgate Dr. S 1986 17,376 100% 100% 65%
207 South Westgate Dr. S 1986 26,448 100 100 65
300 South Westgate Dr. S 1986 12,960 100 100 65
4600 Dundas Circle S 1985 11,922 100 100 65
4602 Dundas Circle S 1985 13,017 61 61 65
RADAR ROAD
500 Radar Rd. I 1981 78,000 100 100 4
502 Radar Rd. I 1986 15,000 100 100 10
504 Radar Rd. I 1986 15,000 100 100 10
506 Radar Rd. I 1986 15,000 100 100 10
HOLDEN/85 BUSINESS PARK
2616 Phoenix Dr. I 1985 31,894 100 100 32
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 100 S 1989 15,000 100 100 32
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 200 S 1989 15,000 100 100 32
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 300 S 1989 7,380 67 67 32
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 400 S 1989 12,300 90 90 32
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 500 S 1989 15,180 100 100 32
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 600 S 1989 18,540 90 90 32
INDUSTRIAL VILLAGE
7906 Industrial Village Rd.
I 1985 15,000 100 100 15
7908 Industrial Village Rd.
I 1985 15,000 100 100 15
7910 Industrial Village Rd.
I 1985 15,000 100 100 15
OTHER PIEDMONT TRIAD PROPERTIES
6348 Burnt Poplar I 1990 125,000 100 100 4
6350 Burnt Poplar I 1992 57,600 100 100 3
Stratford O 1991 135,533 97 97 100
Chesapeake I 1993 250,000 100 100 3
3288 Robinhood O 1989 19,599 76 76 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 4,167,233 92% 90%
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
<S> <C>
WESTGATE ON WENDOVER -- PHASE II
206 South Westgate Dr. Home Care of the Central Carolinas
207 South Westgate Dr. Health Equipment Services
300 South Westgate Dr. N/A
4600 Dundas Circle Oakwood Homes, Aquaterra, Inc.
4602 Dundas Circle Four Seasons Apparel
RADAR ROAD
500 Radar Rd. Amoco Foam
502 Radar Rd. East Texas Distributing
504 Radar Rd. Triad International Maintenance,
Dayva Industries
506 Radar Rd. Triad International Maintenance,
American Coatings
HOLDEN/85 BUSINESS PARK
2616 Phoenix Dr. Pliana, Inc.
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 100 Piedmont Plastics, Rexham Corp.
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 200 REHAU, Inc., Readervision, Inc.
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 300 N/A
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 400 Spectrum Financial Services
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 500 The Record Exchange
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 600 AT&T, Sumitomo Electrical
INDUSTRIAL VILLAGE
7906 Industrial Village Rd.
Texas Aluminum
7908 Industrial Village Rd.
Bullock Distributors, Air Express
7910 Industrial Village Rd.
Wadkin North America, Inc.
OTHER PIEDMONT TRIAD PROPERTIES
6348 Burnt Poplar Sears Roebuck & Co.
6350 Burnt Poplar Industries for the Blind
Stratford Southern National Bank
Chesapeake Chesapeake Display & Packaging
3288 Robinhood N/A
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CHARLOTTE, NC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STEELE CREEK PARK
Bldg. A I 1989 42,500 100 100 19
Bldg. B I 1985 15,031 100 100 20
Bldg. E I 1985 39,300 79 79 13
Bldg. G-1 I 1989 22,500 44 44 11
Bldg. H I 1987 53,614 100 100 16
Bldg. K I 1985 19,400 100 100 25
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH BUSINESS PARK
4101 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1984 12,185 81 81 60
4105 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1984 4,528 100 100 60
4109 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1984 15,212 94 94 60
4201 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1982 19,333 63 63 60
4205 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1982 23,401 100 100 60
4209 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1982 15,901 100 100 60
4215 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1982 23,372 88 88 60
4301 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1982 40,601 89 89 60
4321 Stuart Andrew Blvd. S 1982 12,774 100 100 60
<CAPTION>
CHARLOTTE, NC
<S> <C>
STEELE CREEK PARK
Bldg. A Terrell Gear Drives, Inc.
Bldg. B Pumps Parts & Services Inc. (7)
Bldg. E Bradman-Lake Inc., Aptech, Inc.
Bldg. G-1 Safewaste Corp.
Bldg. H Sugravo Rallis Engraving,
Eurotherm Drives, Inc.
Bldg. K Aptech, Inc.
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH BUSINESS PARK
4101 Stuart Andrew Blvd. N/A
4105 Stuart Andrew Blvd. Re-Directions, Transit & Level
Clinic, Bell/Sysco Food
4109 Stuart Andrew Blvd. N/A
4201 Stuart Andrew Blvd. N/A
4205 Stuart Andrew Blvd. Sunbelt Video, Inc.
4209 Stuart Andrew Blvd. N/A
4215 Stuart Andrew Blvd. Cleaning Services Group, Rodan,
Inc.
4301 Stuart Andrew Blvd. Circle K
4321 Stuart Andrew Blvd. Communications Technology
</TABLE>
S-41
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PARKWAY PLAZA
Building 1 O 1982 58,263 88% 88% 100%
Building 2 O 1983 88,227 93 93 100
Building 3 O 1984 82,307 81 81 100
Building 7 (8) O 1985 60,722 100 100 100
Building 8 (8) O 1986 40,615 100 100 100
Building 9 (8) I 1984 110,000 100 100 32
OTHER CHARLOTTE PROPERTIES
First Citizens O 1989 57,214 100 100 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 857,000 93% 93%
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
<S> <C>
PARKWAY PLAZA
Building 1 BASF Corporation
Building 2 N/A
Building 3 N/A
Building 7 (8) Northwest Mortgage
Building 8 (8) Greenpoint Financial Corp.
Building 9 (8) Personal Financial Asst., Inc.
OTHER CHARLOTTE PROPERTIES
First Citizens Volvo Car Finance, Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NASHVILLE, TN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MARYLAND FARMS
Eastpark 1 O 1978 29,797 96 96 100
Eastpark 2 O 1978 85,516 100 100 100
Eastpark 3 O 1978 77,480 99 99 100
5310 Maryland Way O 1994 76,615 100 100 100
OTHER NASHVILLE PROPERTIES
Lakeview O 1986 99,722 100 100 100
3401 Westend O 1982 253,010 98 98 100
BNA O 1985 234,377 92 92 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 856,517 97% 97%
<CAPTION>
NASHVILLE, TN
<S> <C>
MARYLAND FARMS
Eastpark 1 Brentwood Music, Volunteer Credit
Corp.
Eastpark 2 PMT Services, Inc.
Eastpark 3 N/A
5310 Maryland Way BellSouth
OTHER NASHVILLE PROPERTIES
Lakeview The Kroger Co. (9), Centex
3401 Westend N/A
BNA N/A
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RICHMOND, VA
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INNSBROOK OFFICE CENTER
Markel American O 1988 39,306 93 93 100
Proctor-Silex O 1986 58,366 100 100 100
Vantage Place I O 1987 15,334 100 100 100
Vantage Place II O 1987 14,223 90 90 100
Vantage Place III O 1988 14,615 100 100 100
Vantage Place IV O 1988 14,616 100 100 100
Vantage Point O 1990 63,867 100 100 100
Innsbrook Tech I S 1991 18,095 100 100 58
DEQ Technology Center O 1991 53,999 81 81 80
DEQ Office O 1991 70,423 100 100 100
TECHNOLOGY PARK
Virginia Center O 1985 119,064 92 75 70
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 481,908 95% 91%
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF ALL
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES 10,064,688 94% 93%
<CAPTION>
RICHMOND, VA
<S> <C>
INNSBROOK OFFICE CENTER
Markel American Mark IV
Proctor-Silex Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Vantage Place I Rountrey and Associates
Vantage Place II Hastings-Tapley
Vantage Place III Stenrich Group, Inc.
Vantage Place IV Corvel Healthcare, Cemetary Mgmt.
Vantage Point EDS, Colonial Inc.
Innsbrook Tech I Air Specialists of VA, Hobbs &
Assoc.
DEQ Technology Center Virginia State Gov., First Health
DEQ Office Virginia State Gov.
TECHNOLOGY PARK
Virginia Center N/A
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF ALL
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES
</TABLE>
S-42
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CROCKER PROPERTIES
TAMPA, FL
Tower Place O 1988 180,848 93% 93% 100%
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Atrium O 1989 129,855 71 71 100
Sabal Business Center VI O 1988 99,136 100 100 100
Progressive Insurance O 1988 83,648 100 100 100
Sabal Business Center VII O 1990 71,248 100 100 100
Sabal Business Center V O 1988 60,578 100 100 100
Registry II O 1987 58,781 94 94 100
Registry I O 1985 58,319 86 86 100
Sabal Business Center IV O 1984 49,368 100 100 90
Sabal Tech Center O 1989 48,220 100 100 100
Sabal Park Plaza O 1987 46,758 93 93 100
Sabal Lake Building O 1986 44,533 88 88 100
Sabal Business Center I O 1982 40,698 88 88 100
Benjamin Center #9 O 1989 38,405 85 85 90
Sabal Business Center II O 1984 32,660 79 79 80
Benjamin Center #7 O 1991 30,960 83 83 90
Registry Square O 1988 26,568 94 94 100
Expo Building O 1981 25,600 100 100 100
Sabal Business Center III O 1984 21,300 74 74 100
Day Care Center O 1986 8,000 100 100 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 1,155,483 91% 91%
<CAPTION>
ATLANTA, GA
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Oakbrook V O 1985 204,381 100 100 70
Oakbrook III S 1984 164,330 100 100 60
Oakbrook II S 1983 141,942 67 67 60
Oakbrook I S 1981 106,680 87 84 50
Oakbrook IV O 1985 89,412 100 100 70
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 706,745 92% 92%
<CAPTION>
GREENVILLE, SC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Brookfield-Jacobs-Sirrine O 1990 228,345 100 100 100
Brookfield Plaza O 1987 116,800 90 73 100
Patewood Business Center S 1983 103,302 100 100 70
Patewood V O 1990 100,187 100 100 100
Patewood IV O 1989 61,649 100 100 100
Patewood III O 1989 61,367 76 76 100
Brookfield-YMCA S 1990 15,500 46 46 50
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 687,150 95% 95%
<CAPTION>
BOCA RATON, FL
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
One Boca Place O 1987 277,630 98 98 100
Scott Center O 1989 148,944 96 96 100
Crocker Financial Plaza O 1980 80,260 98 98 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 506,834 98% 98%
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
TAMPA, FL
Tower Place N/A
<S> <C>
Atrium GTE Data Services, Incorporated
Sabal Business Center VI Pharmacy Management Services, Inc.
Progressive Insurance Progressive American Insurance Co.
Sabal Business Center VII Pharmacy Management Services, Inc.
Sabal Business Center V Lebbar-Friedman Inc.
Registry II N/A
Registry I N/A
Sabal Business Center IV Phillips Educational Group of
Central Florida, Inc.,
TGC Home Health Care, Inc.
Sabal Tech Center National RX Services, Inc.
Sabal Park Plaza State of Florida Department of
Revenue,
ERM South, Inc.
Sabal Lake Building Warner Publisher Services, Inc.
Sabal Business Center I N/A
Benjamin Center #9 First Image Management Company
Sabal Business Center II Owen Ayres and Associates, Inc.
Benjamin Center #7 Basetec Office Systems, Inc.
Registry Square Proctor & Redfern, Inc.
Expo Building Exposystems, Inc.
Sabal Business Center III Eli Witt Co.
Day Care Center Telesco Enterprises, Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
ATLANTA, GA
<S> <C>
Oakbrook V N/A
Oakbrook III N/A
Oakbrook II N/A
Oakbrook I N/A
Oakbrook IV N/A
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GREENVILLE, SC
<S> <C>
Brookfield-Jacobs-Sirrine Jacobs-Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
Brookfield Plaza Dow Brands, Inc.
Patewood Business Center N/A
Patewood V Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems,
Inc.,
PYA/Monarch, Inc.
Patewood IV MCI Telecommunications Corp.
Patewood III MCI Telecommunications Corp.
Brookfield-YMCA Kids & Company at Pelham Falls,
Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
BOCA RATON, FL
<S> <C>
One Boca Place N/A
Scott Center N/A
Crocker Financial Plaza N/A
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
</TABLE>
S-43
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
CHARLOTTE, NC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Oakhill Business Park- O 1985 97,652 94% 94% 85%
Twin Oaks
Oakhill Business Park- O 1985 90,853 97 97 100
Water Oak
Oakhill Business Park-Scarlet Oak O 1982 76,433 100 100 70
Oakhill Business Park-English Oak O 1984 55,013 100 100 80
Oakhill Business Park-Willow Oak O 1982 38,448 100 0 100
Oakhill Business Park-Laurel Oak O 1984 38,448 74 74 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 396,847 95% 85%
<CAPTION>
MEMPHIS, TN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
International Place Phase II O 1988 208,006 100 100 100
Southwind Office Center "A" O 1991 62,179 100 99 100
Southwind Office Center "B" O 1990 61,860 100 98 100
Kirby Centre O 1984 32,007 98 98 100
Medical Properties, Inc. O 1988 18,079 100 100 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 382,131 100% 99%
<CAPTION>
RESEARCH TRIANGLE, NC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ONCC-Phase I S 1981 101,127 92 92 60
ONCC-"W" Building O 1983 91,335 100 100 80
5301 Departure Drive S 1984 84,899 100 100 50
ONCC 3645 Trust Drive O 1984 50,652 81 81 90
ONCC 5220 Green's Dairy Road O 1984 29,869 100 100 90
ONCC 5200 Green's Dairy Road O 1984 18,317 82 82 80
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 376,199 95% 95%
<CAPTION>
NASHVILLE, TN
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Grassmere II S 1985 145,092 94 94 70
Grassmere III S 1990 103,000 100 100 60
Grassmere I S 1984 87,902 100 100 70
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 335,994 97% 97%
<CAPTION>
COLUMBIA, SC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fontaine I O 1985 97,576 96 96 80
Center Point I O 1988 71,380 100 95 100
Fontaine II O 1987 70,762 62 57 70
Fontaine III O 1988 57,888 100 100 100
Fontaine V O 1990 21,107 100 100 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 318,713 90% 88%
<CAPTION>
ORLANDO, FL
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Metrowest I O 1988 102,019 99 99 90
Southwest Corporate Center O 1984 98,777 100 100 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 200,796 100% 100%
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
CHARLOTTE, NC
<S> <C>
Oakhill Business Park- Springs Industries, Inc.
Twin Oaks
Oakhill Business Park- N/A
Water Oak
Oakhill Business Park-Scarlet Oak Krueger Ringier, Inc.,
The Computer Group, Inc.
Oakhill Business Park-English Oak The Employers Association of the
Carolinas
Oakhill Business Park-Willow Oak Coats American
Oakhill Business Park-Laurel Oak Paramount Parks Inc.,
Woolpert Consultants
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
MEMPHIS, TN
<S> <C>
International Place Phase II AC Humko Corp.,
International Paper Company
Southwind Office Center "A" Promus Hotels, Inc.
Southwind Office Center "B" Check Solutions, Inc.
Kirby Centre Financial Federal Savings Bank,
Union Central Life Insurance Co.
Medical Properties, Inc. Health Tech Affiliates, Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
RESEARCH TRIANGLE, NC
<S> <C>
ONCC-Phase I Monolith Corporation
ONCC-"W" Building International Business Machines
Corp.
5301 Departure Drive ABB Power T&D Co., Inc.,
Cardiovascular Diagnostics, Inc.
ONCC 3645 Trust Drive Customer Access Resources, Inc.
ONCC 5220 Green's Dairy Road N/A
ONCC 5200 Green's Dairy Road Carolina Power & Light Company
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NASHVILLE, TN
<S> <C>
Grassmere II N/A
Grassmere III Harris Graphics Corporation
Grassmere I Contel Cellular of Nashville, Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
COLUMBIA, SC
<S> <C>
Fontaine I Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
South Carolina
Center Point I Sedgewick James of South Carolina,
Inc.,
BellSouth Mobility, Inc.
Fontaine II N/A
Fontaine III Companion Health Care
Fontaine V Roche Biomedical Laboratories,
Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
ORLANDO, FL
<S> <C>
Metrowest I N/A
Southwest Corporate Center Walt Disney World Co.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
</TABLE>
S-44
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT PERCENT
RENTABLE LEASED AT OCCUPIED AT PERCENT
BUILDING YEAR SQUARE MARCH 31, MARCH 31, OFFICE
PROPERTY TYPE (1) BUILT FEET 1996 1996 FINISH
NORFOLK, VA
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Battlefield I S 1987 97,633 100% 100% 10%
Greenbrier Business Center O 1984 81,373 100 100 80
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 179,006 100% 100%
<CAPTION>
ASHEVILLE, NC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Ridgefield II O 1989 63,500 100 84 80
Ridgefield I S 1987 60,677 100 100 70
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 124,177 100% 92%
<CAPTION>
BIRMINGHAM, AL
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Grandview I O 1989 111,905 98% 98% 100
<CAPTION>
PIEDMONT TRIAD, NC
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Deep River I O 1989 78,094 100 100 90
Forsyth I O 1985 51,236 58 58 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 129,330 83% 83%
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Towermarc Plaza O 1991 50,513 100% 100% 100
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE 5,661,823 95% 93%
OF ALL CROCKER PROPERTIES
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OF ALL PROPERTIES 15,726,511 94% 93%
<CAPTION>
TENANTS LEASING
25% OR MORE
OF RENTABLE
SQUARE FEET AT
PROPERTY MARCH 31, 1996
NORFOLK, VA
<S> <C>
Battlefield I Kasei Memory Products, Inc.
Greenbrier Business Center Canon Computer Systems, Inc.,
Roche Biomedical Laboratories,
Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
ASHEVILLE, NC
<S> <C>
Ridgefield II N/A
Ridgefield I Memorial Mission Hospital, Inc.
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
BIRMINGHAM, AL
<S> <C>
Grandview I Computer Sciences Corporation
PIEDMONT TRIAD, NC
<S> <C>
Deep River I N/A
Forsyth I Alexander & Alexander
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Towermarc Plaza Aetna Casualty
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OF ALL CROCKER PROPERTIES
TOTAL OR WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OF ALL PROPERTIES
</TABLE>
(1) I = Industrial, S = Service Center and O = Office.
(2) Raleigh Neurology Clinic has an option to purchase 33% of the Property in
December 1998 for cash at the then current fair market value, as to be
determined by an independent appraiser.
(3) CompuChem's lease expired May 31, 1996.
(4) Glaxo Wellcome has the option to purchase the Property from March 1997 to
the earlier of lease termination (currently March 2000) or March 2003 for
cash at the then current fair market value to be determined by an appraiser
chosen by the Company, provided the terms of such purchase are acceptable to
the Company and Glaxo Wellcome.
(5) Highland Industries, Inc., which entered into a 10-year lease beginning
January 1991, has the option during the term of its lease to purchase the
Property for a price of $1,034,000 during each of the first five years and,
thereafter, at decreasing amounts through the tenth year of the lease term
when the price will be $926,000.
(6) Ivy Distribution Center enables the Company to establish relationships with
potential tenants that need large blocks of affordable storage space,
frequently on a short-term basis. With the exception of 1989 when the
building was renovated to convert it from a manufacturing facility to a bulk
warehouse facility, Ivy Distribution Center has produced a positive cash
flow every year since its acquisition in 1978.
(7) Pump Parts & Services, Inc. has an option to purchase the Property for a
purchase price of $37.37 per square foot ($561,708) (as of August 1995)
subject to a minimum increase in the per square foot purchase price of 5%
per year.
(8) Properties subject to ground lease expiring December 31, 2082. The Company
has the option to purchase land during the lease term at the greater of
$35,000 per acre or 85% of appraised value.
(9) Kroger Co. has an option to purchase the Property through January 2001. The
purchase price under the option is $10 million through January 1999 (and
$10.8 million from January 1999 through January 2001) subject to all
encumbrances, plus unamortized tenant improvements funded by the Company and
unamortized leasing commissions.
S-45
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
directors and executive officers of the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE PRINCIPAL OCCUPATIONS AND OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS
<S> <C> <C>
O. Temple Sloan, Jr. 56 Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Sloan is a founder of the predecessor
of the Company and most recently served as its secretary-treasurer. Mr. Sloan also serves as
chairman of General Parts, Inc., a nationwide distributor of automobile replacement parts,
which he founded. Mr. Sloan is vice chairman of the board of trustees of Peace College and
is a trustee of St. Andrews College.
Ronald P. Gibson 51 Director, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gibson is a founder of the Company and
has served as its president since its incorporation in 1992 and as managing partner of its
predecessor since its formation in 1978. Mr. Gibson is a member of the Society of Industrial
and Office Realtors and is a director of Capital Associated Industries.
William T. Wilson, III 42 Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Wilson joined Forsyth in
1982 and served as its president from 1993 until its merger with the Company. Mr. Wilson
serves on the board of directors of Amos Cottage Rehabilitation Hospital, an affiliate of
the Department of Pediatrics of Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Old Salem, Inc. and Reynolda
House, Inc.
John L. Turner 49 Director, Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Turner
began his career in the real estate industry in 1969 and co-founded Forsyth's predecessor in
1975. Mr. Turner is active in several Piedmont Triad economic development and business
recruiting organizations. Mr. Turner serves on the University of North Carolina board of
visitors and on the Winston-Salem board of directors of NationsBank.
John W. Eakin 41 Director and Senior Vice President. Mr. Eakin is responsible for operations in Tennessee,
Florida and Alabama. Mr. Eakin joined the Company on April 1, 1996 upon consummation of the
merger of Eakin & Smith into the Company. Prior to the combination, Mr. Eakin was a founder
and president of Eakin & Smith, Inc., which managed, leased and developed office and
industrial space in Nashville, Tennessee.
Thomas S. Smith 37 Director and Vice President. Mr. Smith joined the Company as a director and vice president
on April 1, 1996 in connection with the Company's combination with Eakin & Smith. Prior to
the combination, Mr. Smith was a founder and chairman of Eakin & Smith, Inc. since its
formation in 1987.
Thomas W. Adler 55 Director. Mr. Adler is chairman and a principal of Cleveland Real Estate Partners, a
fee-based real estate service company based in Cleveland, Ohio. Mr. Adler helped create the
Grubb and Ellis Institutional Investment Group and previously served as its president. Mr.
Adler served five years as a member of the executive committee and board of governors of the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, and he was national president in 1990
of the Society of Industrial and Office Realtors. Mr. Adler formerly served on the board of
directors of the National Association of Realtors and currently serves on the board of
governors of the American Society of Real Estate Counselors. He is an active member of the
Urban Land Institute.
William E. Graham, Jr. 66 Director. Mr. Graham is a lawyer in private practice with the firm of Hunton & Williams.
Before joining Hunton & Williams on January 1, 1994, Mr. Graham was vice chairman of
Carolina Power & Light Company and had previously served as its general counsel. Mr. Graham
is a former member of the board of directors of Carolina Power & Light Company and currently
serves on the Raleigh board of directors of NationsBank. He also serves on the board of
directors of BB&T Mutual Funds Group and is a former director of Kaiser Foundation Health
Plan of North Carolina.
Robert L. Kirby 65 Director. Mr. Kirby is a self-employed management consultant. Before retiring from the
banking business in 1990, Mr. Kirby spent 34 years with NationsBank and its predecessor,
North Carolina National Bank. At the time of his retirement, he was president and a member
of the board of directors of NCNB National Bank of Florida. Mr. Kirby is a member of the
board of directors of NationsBank of Texas, N.A. and Cato Corporation.
</TABLE>
S-46
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE PRINCIPAL OCCUPATIONS AND OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS
<S> <C> <C>
L. Glenn Orr, Jr. 55 Director. Mr. Orr is a director of Southern National Corporation and was its chairman of the
board of directors, president and chief executive officer prior to its recent merger with
Branch Banking and Trust. Mr. Orr, who previously served as president and chief executive
officer of Forsyth Bank and Trust Co. and president of Community Bank in Greenville, S.C.,
is former president of the North Carolina Bankers Association. He is a trustee of Wake
Forest University.
Willard H. Smith, Jr. 59 Director. Mr. Smith joined the board on April 29, 1996. Mr. Smith recently retired from
Merrill Lynch, which he joined in 1979. He was named a managing director at Merrill Lynch in
1983. Mr. Smith worked in the firm's equity underwriting syndicate and, since 1992, focused
on the company's REIT equity underwriting efforts. Mr. Smith is a member of the board of
directors of Cohen & Steers Realty Shares, Cohen & Steers Realty Income Fund, Cohen & Steers
Total Return Realty Fund and Essex Property Trust, Inc.
Stephen Timko 67 Director. Mr. Timko is treasurer of Beaunit Corporation. He has served as associate vice
president of financial affairs for Temple University and chief financial officer and
executive vice president of finance and administration for Beaunit Corporation.
Edward J. Fritsch 37 Senior Vice President and Secretary. Mr. Fritsch is responsible for the operations of the
Company's Research Triangle division. Mr. Fritsch joined the Company in 1982 and is a
certified property manager.
Carman J. Liuzzo 35 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Liuzzo joined the Company in 1994
and currently serves as chief financial officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Liuzzo
was vice president and chief accounting officer for Boddie-Noell Enterprise, Inc. and
Boddie-Noell Restaurant Properties, Inc. Mr. Liuzzo is a certified public accountant.
John E. Reece II 36 Vice President. Mr. Reece is responsible for the operations of the Company's Piedmont Triad
area properties. Mr. Reece serves on the executive committee and is a former president of
the Piedmont Triad Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Park
Developers.
</TABLE>
In addition, Thomas F. Cochran has agreed to serve as a vice president and
will be an executive officer of the Company upon consummation of the Merger. Mr.
Cochran will manage the Charlotte, Greenville and Atlanta regions. Mr. Cochran
served as senior vice president for NationsBank from 1987 to 1993 where he was
responsible for development and asset management of 47 of the Crocker
Properties. In 1993 he joined Patriot American Asset Management where he was a
senior vice president and continued the management of 47 Crocker Properties. Mr.
Cochran became senior vice president with Crocker upon the merger of Southeast
Realty Corp. with Crocker Realty Investors, Inc. in July 1995.
In addition, Messrs. Harris, Peek and Vallace, who are officers of Crocker,
have agreed to serve as officers of Highwoods upon consummation of the Merger.
See "Recent Developments -- Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty Trust, Inc."
S-47
<PAGE>
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions contained in the terms agreement and
the related underwriting agreement (collectively the "Underwriting Agreement"),
the Company has agreed to sell to each of the underwriters named below (the
"Underwriters"), and each of the Underwriters, for whom Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch"), Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, PaineWebber Incorporated, Prudential Securities
Incorporated, The Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc. and Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
are acting as representatives (the "Representatives"), has severally agreed to
purchase from the Company, the respective number of shares of Common Stock set
forth below opposite their respective names.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
UNDERWRITER SHARES
<S> <C>
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated.......................................................................................
Dean Witter Reynolds Inc........................................................................................
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated...............................................................................
PaineWebber Incorporated........................................................................................
Prudential Securities Incorporated..............................................................................
The Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc..............................................................................
Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.......................................................................................
Total.............................................................................................. 10,000,000
</TABLE>
In the Underwriting Agreement, the several Underwriters have agreed,
respectively, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Underwriting
Areement, to purchase all of the shares of Common Stock being sold pursuant to
the Underwriting Agreement if any such shares are purchased. Under certain
circumstances, the commitments of non-defaulting Underwriters may be increased.
The Representatives have advised the Company that the Underwriters propose
initially to offer the shares of Common Stock to the public at the public
offering price set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement and to
certain dealers at such price less a concession not in excess of $ per
share. The Underwriters may allow, and such dealers may re-allow, a discount not
in excess of $ per share on sales to certain other dealers. After the
initial public offering, the public offering price, concession and discount may
be changed.
The Company has granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable for 30
days after the date of this Prospectus Supplement, to purchase up to 1,500,000
additional shares of Common Stock to cover over-allotments, if any, at the
initial offering price to the public less the underwriting discount set forth on
the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement. If the Underwriters exercise this
option, each Underwriter will have a firm commitment, subject to certain
conditions, to purchase approximately the same percentage thereof which the
number of shares of Common Stock to be
S-48
<PAGE>
purchased by it shown in the foregoing table bears to the total number of shares
of Common Stock initially offered hereby.
In the Underwriting Agreement, the Company has agreed to indemnify the
Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act. Insofar as indemnification of the Underwriters for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act may be permitted pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, the Company has been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
is therefore unenforceable.
The Company and the executive officers and directors of the Company have
agreed that for a period of 120 days from the date of this Prospectus Supplement
they will not, without the prior written consent of Merrill Lynch, sell, offer
to sell, grant any option for the sale of, or otherwise dispose of any shares of
Common Stock or any security convertible into or exercisable for shares, except
for the issuance of Common Stock in connection with property acquisitions, the
1994 Stock Option Plan or the conversion of Units.
Merrill Lynch from time to time provides investment banking and financial
advisory services to the Company. Merrill Lynch also acted as representative of
various underwriters in connection with public offerings of the Company's Common
Stock in 1994 and 1995. In connection with the Merger, Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated rendered advisory services and provided an opinion to the Board of
Directors of the Company for which they will be paid a total fee of
approximately $3.3 million.
The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
"HIW."
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Company by Smith Helms
Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina. Certain legal matters related
to the Offering will be passed upon for the Underwriters by Andrews & Kurth
L.L.P., Washington, D.C. Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. and Andrews & Kurth
L.L.P. will rely on Piper & Marbury L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland as to certain
matters of Maryland law.
S-49
<PAGE>
INDEX TO PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
<S> <C>
Pro Forma Condensed Combining Balance Sheet (unaudited) as of March 31, 1996........................................... F-2
Notes to Pro Forma Balance Sheet....................................................................................... F-3
Pro Forma Condensed Combining Statement of Operations (unaudited) for the quarter ended March 31, 1996................. F-5
Notes to Pro Forma Statements of Operations............................................................................ F-6
Pro Forma Condensed Combining Statement of Operations (unaudited) for the year ended December 31, 1995................. F-8
Notes to Pro Forma Statements of Operations............................................................................ F-9
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINING BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
MARCH 31, 1996
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EAKIN & SMITH CROCKER
HISTORICAL (A) TRANSACTION OFFERING (F) REALTY TRUST (G) MERGER
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Real estate assets, net........... $602,276 $91,911(b) $ -- $376,039 $ 155,299(h)
Cash and cash equivalents......... 8,383 258,420 17,742 (258,420)(i)
Accounts and notes
receivables..................... 7,861 1,557
Accrued straight line rent
receivable...................... 3,807 3,461
Other assets...................... 10,317 14,635 (5,131)(j)
$632,644 $91,911 $258,420 $413,434 $(108,252)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Mortgages and notes payable....... $196,718 $63,680(c) $ -- $239,502 $ 50,411(i)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other....................... 9,977 15,269
Total liabilities................. 206,695 63,680 -- 254,771 50,411
Minority interest................. 73,440 14,772(d)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock.................... 194 5(e) 100 270 (270)(k)
Additional paid in capital...... 355,248 13,454(e) 238,320 158,393 (158,393)(k)
Distributions in excess of net
earnings..................... (2,933)
Total stockholders' equity........ 352,509 13,459 258,420 158,663 (158,663)
$632,644 $91,911 $258,420 $413,434 $(108,252)
<CAPTION>
PRO FORMA
<S> <C>
ASSETS
Real estate assets, net........... $1,225,525
Cash and cash equivalents......... 26,125
Accounts and notes
receivables..................... 9,418
Accrued straight line rent
receivable...................... 7,268
Other assets...................... 19,821
$1,288,157
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Mortgages and notes payable....... $ 550,311
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other....................... 25,246
Total liabilities................. 575,557
Minority interest................. 88,212
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock.................... 299
Additional paid in capital...... 627,022
Distributions in excess of net
earnings..................... (2,933)
Total stockholders' equity........ 624,388
$1,288,157
</TABLE>
F-2
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
MARCH 31, 1996
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combining balance sheet is
presented as if the following transactions had been consummated on March 31,
1996: (a) the completion of the acquisition of Eakin & Smith, Inc. and its
affiliates ("Eakin & Smith"), (b) the completion of the proposed Crocker Realty
Trust, Inc. ("Crocker") stock purchase and merger (the "Merger") and (c) the
issuance of 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an assumed price of $27.375 per
share (the "Offering").
The acquisitions have been or will be accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. Accordingly, assets acquired and liabilities assumed have
been or will be recorded at their estimated fair values which may be subject to
further refinement, including appraisals and other analyses. Management does not
expect that the final allocation of the purchase prices for the above
acquisitions will differ materially from the preliminary allocations.
This unaudited pro forma condensed combining balance sheet should be read
in conjunction with the pro forma condensed combining statement of operations of
the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 1996 and information included under
the captions "The Company" and "Recent Developments" in this Prospectus
Supplement; the consolidated financial statements and related notes of the
Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1995, the unaudited financial statements and related notes of the Company
included in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1996, and the financial statements and related notes of the entities acquired by
the Company included in its Current Reports on Form 8-K dated February 10, 1995,
July 12, 1995, December 18, 1995, April 1, 1996 and April 29, 1996 (each, as may
have been amended) incorporated by reference in this Prospectus Supplement. The
pro forma financial statements and related notes to the pro forma financial
statements of the entities acquired by the Company included in its Form 8-K
dated April 1, 1996 and April 29, 1996 does not give effect to the Offering
mentioned above.
The pro forma condensed combining balance sheet is unaudited and is not
necessarily indicative of what the actual financial position would have been had
the aforementioned transactions actually occurred on March 31, 1996 nor does it
purport to represent the future financial position of the Company.
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(a.) Represents the Company's historical balance sheet contained in the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.
(b.) Represents the initial purchase price of $91,610,000 for the seven
in-service suburban office properties totaling 848,000 square feet, the
103,000-square foot suburban development project, 18 acres of development land
and Eakin and Smith's brokerage and property management operations (the "Eakin &
Smith Transaction") plus closing costs of approximately $300,000. The entire
purchase price was allocated to the real estate assets based on the fair value
at the date of acquisition. Additionally, the Company has entered into a
contingent consideration arrangement with the three principals of Eakin & Smith
whereby an additional 54,056 shares of common stock may be issued to these
individuals if third-party service revenue attributable to the Eakin & Smith
brokerage and property management operations exceed specified levels in future
periods. Any contingent consideration issued will be recorded as additional
purchase price and allocated to the fair value of the brokerage and property
management operations. As noted in Note 1, the initial allocation at estimated
fair value may be subject to further refinement, however, management does not
expect the final allocation will differ materially from the preliminary
allocations.
(c.) Represents the assumption of $37,027,000 of mortgage indebtedness at
an average rate of 8.0% and borrowings on the Company's Credit Facility of
$26,653,000 to fund the cash component of the Eakin & Smith Transaction.
(d.) Represents the issuance of 537,138 Units of Highwoods/Forsyth Limited
Partnership valued at the April 1, 1996 closing price of the Company's Common
Stock of $27.50 to the sellers in connection with the Eakin & Smith Transaction.
F-3
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET -- CONTINUED
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET -- Continued
(e.) Represents the issuance of 489,421 shares of Common Stock valued at
the April 1, 1996 closing price of $27.50 to the sellers in connection with the
Eakin & Smith Transaction.
(f.) Represents the issuance of 10,000,000 shares in the Offering and the
investment of the net proceeds in cash and cash equivalents. In determining net
proceeds from the Offering, underwriting discounts and other offering costs have
been assumed to equal $15,330,000.
(g.) Represents the historical balance sheet of Crocker as of March 31,
1996.
(h.) Represents the adjustment to record the real estate assets of Crocker
at their fair values.
(i.) Represents the funding of the cash purchase price for the outstanding
common stock of Crocker (26,981,087 shares outstanding at $11.02 per share or
$297,331,000) and the expenses of the Merger ($11,500,000). The total cash
requirement of $308,831,000 is assumed to be funded from the net proceeds from
the Offering of $258,420,000 described in (f.) above and through a draw from the
Company's credit facility of $50,411,000.
(j.) Represents the elimination of the management contract and goodwill
assets included in the Crocker historical balance sheet.
(k.) Represents the elimination of the common stock and additional paid in
capital amounts included in the Crocker historical balance sheet.
F-4
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MERGER
EAKIN & SMITH CROCKER PRE-ACQUISITION PRO FORMA
HISTORICAL(A) TRANSACTION(B) HISTORICAL(C) RESULTS(D) ADJUSTMENTS
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE:
Rental property................... $23,385 $3,000 $16,970 $ 520 $ 300(e)
Other income...................... 372 964 890 12 (563)(f)
23,757 3,964 17,860 532 (263)
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Rental property................... 6,154 957 6,310 179 (615)(g)
Leasing, development and
construction.................... -- 452 -- --
Depreciation and amortization..... 3,716 526 2,722 108 (317)(h)
Interest expense:
Contractual..................... 3,542 739 5,055 215 1,350(i)
Amortization of deferred
financing costs.............. 409 272 78(j)
3,951 739 5,327 215 1,428
General and administrative........ 934 153 1,870 (1,673)(k)
Income before minority interest... 9,002 1,137 1,631 30 914
Minority interest................. (1,571) (18)(l)
Net income........................ $ 7,431 $1,137 $ 1,631 $ 30 $ 896
Net income per share.............. $ 0.38
Weighted average shares........... 19,406
<CAPTION>
PRO FORMA
<S> <C>
REVENUE:
Rental property................... $44,175
Other income...................... 1,675
45,850
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Rental property................... 12,985
Leasing, development and
construction.................... 452
Depreciation and amortization..... 6,755
Interest expense:
Contractual..................... 10,901
Amortization of deferred
financing costs.............. 759
11,660
General and administrative........ 1,284
Income before minority interest... 12,714
Minority interest................. (1,589)
Net income........................ $11,125
Net income per share.............. $ 0.37
Weighted average shares........... 29,897
</TABLE>
F-5
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1996
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combining statement of
operations is presented as if the following transactions had been consummated on
January 1, 1995: (a) the completion of the Eakin & Smith Transaction and (b) the
completion of the Merger and the Offering.
This unaudited pro forma condensed combining statement of operations should
be read in conjunction with the pro forma condensed balance sheet of the Company
for the quarter ended March 31, 1996 and information included under the captions
"The Company" and "Recent Developments" in this Prospectus Supplement; the
consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company included in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, the
unaudited financial statements and related notes of the Company included in its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996, and the
financial statements and related notes of the entities acquired by the Company
included in its Current Reports on Form 8-K dated February 10, 1995, July 12,
1995, December 18, 1995, April 1, 1996 and April 29, 1996 (each, as may have
been amended) incorporated by reference in this Prospectus Supplement. The pro
forma financial statements and related notes to the pro forma financial
statements of the entities acquired by the Company included in its Form 8-K
dated April 1, 1996 and April 29, 1996 does not give effect to the Offering
mentioned above.
The pro forma condensed combining statement of operations does not reflect
approximately $5,000,000 of non-recurring expenses which the Company expects to
incur in connection with the Crocker Transaction.
The pro forma condensed combining statement of operations is unaudited and
is not necessarily indicative of what the Company's actual results would have
been had the aforementioned transactions actually occurred on January 1, 1995
nor does it purport to represent the future operating results of the Company.
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
(a.) Represents the Company's historical statement of operations contained
in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.
(b.) Reflects the historical statement of operations of Eakin & Smith for
the quarter ended March 31, 1996.
(c.) Represents the historical statement of operations of Crocker contained
in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.
(d.) Reflects the historical operations of the Towermarc properties, which
were acquired by Crocker on January 16, 1996, adjusted on a pro forma basis for
interest (assumed debt of $57,800,000 at an average rate of 9.0%) and
depreciation expense, for the period from January 1, 1996 to January 16, 1996,
the date of the acquisition of Towermarc. Depreciation expense is calculated on
the purchase price allocated to buildings $(61,051), site improvements ($5,201)
and tenant improvements $(2,040) with depreciation calculated on a straight-line
basis over useful lives of 40 years, 15 years, and the life of the respective
leases, respectively.
(e.) Reflects incremental rental income from a new lease agreement entered
into in connection with the Merger. The lease agreement is a condition of the
Merger.
(f.) Reflects the elimination of certain third-party leasing and property
management income of Crocker not retained by the Company.
(g.) Reflects the net adjustment to rental property expenses to eliminate
the costs related to certain assets (primarily land held for development) which
will be distributed to the current stockholders of Crocker ($200,000) and for
other property operating costs (primarily personnel and office costs for
duplicative property management operations) that are expected to be eliminated
upon the completion of the Merger ($415,000).
F-6
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS -- CONTINUED
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS -- Continued
(h.) Represents the net adjustment to depreciation expense based upon an
assumed allocation of the purchase price to land, buildings, furniture, fixtures
and equipment and development in process and building depreciation computed on a
straight-line basis using an estimated life of 40 years for buildings and 7
years for furniture, fixtures and equipment as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Eakin & Smith Transaction............................................ $ (73)
Merger............................................................... (244)
Total.............................................................. $(317)
</TABLE>
(i.) Represents the net adjustment to interest expense to reflect interest
costs on borrowings under the Company's Credit Facility at an assumed rate of
7.0% (the capped interest rate based on a 30-day LIBOR rate of 5.50% plus 1.50%)
as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Eakin & Smith Transaction (1)....................................... $ 468
Merger (2).......................................................... 882
Total............................................................. $1,350
</TABLE>
(1) $26,653,000 of borrowings at 7.0% for three months.
(2) $50,411,000 of borrowings at 7.0% for three months.
(j.) Represents the amortization of the commitment fee ($937,000) on the
Credit Facility over the 36-month term.
(k.) Represents the net adjustment to general and administrative expense to
reflect the estimated incremental costs (primarily salaries) to the Company of
operating a Nashville division and to reflect the elimination of certain costs
(primarily executive salaries ($250,000), administrative costs ($575,000), the
expenses incurred to generate third-party revenue ($600,000) and the expenses of
operating as a public entity ($295,000)) of Crocker not expected to be incurred
by the Company as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Eakin & Smith Transaction.......................................... $ 47
Merger............................................................. (1,720)
Total............................................................ $(1,673)
</TABLE>
(l.) Represents the net adjustment to minority interest to reflect the pro
forma minority interest percentage of 12.5%.
F-7
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FORSYTH COMBINED
PROPERTIES COMPANY
TRANSACTIONS PRE-MERGER
RESEARCH COMMONS AND EAKIN & MERGER
ACQUISITION AND EAKIN & SMITH
SECOND OFFERING OTHER THIRD SMITH TRANSACTION CROCKER
HISTORICAL (A) (B) ACQUISITIONS (C) OFFERING (D) PRO FORMA (E) HISTORICAL (F)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE:
Revenue:
Rental
property....... $ 71,217 $4,362 $ 12,658 $ -- $ 88,237 $ 9,222 $ 42,489
Other income.... 2,305 50 -- -- 2,355 3,125 1,777
73,522 4,412 12,658 -- 90,592 12,347 44,266
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
Rental
property....... 17,049 923 3,368 135 21,475 2,977 13,601
Leasing,
development and
construction... -- -- -- -- -- 583 --
Depreciation and
amortization... 11,082 985 1,883 -- 13,950 1,956 6,772
Interest
expense:
Contractual.... 12,101 888 3,586 (1,598) 14,977 2,161 16,212
Amortization of
deferred
financing
costs......... 1,619 46 -- -- 1,665 -- 594
13,720 934 3,586 (1,598) 16,642 2,161 16,806
General and
administrative... 2,737 83 -- 98 2,918 763 2,813
Income before
minority
interest...... 28,934 1,487 3,821 1,365 35,607 3,907 4,274
Minority
interest....... (4,937) (384) -- (376) (5,697) -- --
Income before
extraordinary
item.......... $ 23,997 $1,103 $ 3,821 $ 989 $ 29,910 $ 3,907 $ 4,274
Income per
share before
extraordinary
item.......... $ 1.55
Weighed average
shares........ 15,487
<CAPTION>
PRE-
ACQUISITION PRO FORMA PRO
RESULTS (G) ADJUSTMENTS FORMA
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE:
Revenue:
Rental
property....... $23,985 $ 1,200(h) $ 165,133
Other income.... 2,380 (2,628)(i) 7,009
26,365 (1,428) 172,142
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
Rental
property....... 9,619 (2,030)(j) 45,642
Leasing,
development and
construction... -- -- 583
Depreciation and
amortization... 4,881 (972)(k) 26,587
Interest
expense:
Contractual.... 5,689 6,196(l) 45,235
Amortization of
deferred
financing
costs......... -- 312(m) 2,571
5,689 6,508 47,806
General and
administrative... 2,376 (4,652)(n) 4,218
Income before
minority
interest...... 3,800 (282) 47,306
Minority
interest....... -- (216)(o) (5,913)
Income before
extraordinary
item.......... $ 3,800 $ (498) $ 41,393
Income per
share before
extraordinary
item.......... $ 1.38
Weighed average
shares........ 29,897
</TABLE>
F-8
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combining statement of
operations is presented as if the following transactions had been consummated on
January 1, 1995:
(a.) the acquisition of 57 properties, 76 acres of development land
and the business operations of Forsyth Properties, Inc. and its
affiliates (the "Forsyth Transaction");
(b.) the acquisition of six properties (the "Research Commons
Properties") and 60 acres of development land located in the
Research Commons office park (the "Research Commons
Acquisition");
(c.) the issuance of 5,640,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company
at a price of $20.75 per share issued in connection with the
Forsyth Transaction (the "Second Offering");
(d.) the acquisition of 56 properties and six acres of development
land (the "Bissell Portfolio") located in Greensboro and
Charlotte, North Carolina; the acquisition of five properties
(the "Hock Portfolio") located in Durham, North Carolina; the
acquisition of six properties (the "Parkway Plaza Portfolio")
located in Charlotte, North Carolina; the acquisition of two
properties (the "Initial Innsbrook Portfolio") located in
Richmond, Virginia; the acquisition of six properties (the
"Ross-Kreckman Portfolio") located in Richmond, Virginia; the
acquisition of two properties (the "DEQ Property") located in
Richmond, Virginia; and the acquisition of 62 acres of
development land (the "DEQ Land") located in Richmond, Virginia
(collectively, the "Other Acquisitions");
(e.) the issuance of 4,774,989 shares of Common Stock of the Company
at a price of $24.50 per share (the "Third Offering");
(f.) the completion of the Eakin and Smith Transaction;
(g.) the completion of the Merger; and
(h.) the completion of the Offering.
This unaudited pro forma condensed combining statement of operations should
be read in conjunction with the pro forma condensed combining balance sheet of
the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 1996 and information included under
the captions "The Company" and "Recent Developments" in this Prospectus
Supplement; the consolidated financial statements and related notes of the
Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1995, the unaudited financial statements and related notes of the Company
included in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1996, and the financial statements and related notes of the entities acquired by
the Company included in its Current Reports on Form 8-K dated February 10, 1995,
July 12, 1995, December 18, 1995, April 1, 1996 and April 29, 1996 (each, as may
have been amended) incorporated by reference in this Prospectus Supplement.
The pro forma condensed combining statement of operations does not reflect
approximately $5,000,000 of non-recurring expenses which the Company expects to
incur in connection with the Merger.
The pro forma condensed combining statement of operations is unaudited and
is not necessarily indicative of what the Company's actual results would have
been had the aforementioned transactions actually occurred on January 1, 1995
nor does it purport to represent the future operating results of the Company.
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(a.) Represents the Company's historical statement of operations contained
in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995.
F-9
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS -- CONTINUED
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS -- Continued
(b.) Reflects the Second Offering and the historical operations of the
Forsyth Properties and Research Commons Properties, adjusted on a pro
forma basis for interest and depreciation expense, for the period of
time during 1995 prior to their acquisition by the Company.
(c.) Reflects the historical operations of the Other Acquisitions, adjusted
on a pro forma basis for interest and depreciation expense, for the
period of time during 1995 prior to their acquisition by the Company.
(d.) Reflects the reduction in interest expense associated with the
repayment of certain debt and the addition of certain incremental
rental property and general and administrative expenses as a result of
the Bissell and Ross-Kreckman Portfolio acquisitions.
(e.) Reflects the historical statement of operations of Eakin & Smith for
the year ended December 31, 1995.
(f.) Represents the historical statement of operations of Crocker contained
in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995.
(g.) Reflects the historical operations of Crocker Realty Investors, Inc.,
Crocker & Sons, Inc., Crocker Realty Management Services, Inc., the
Sabal properties and the Towermarc properties, adjusted on a pro forma
basis for interest and depreciation expense, for the period of time
during 1995 prior to their acquisition by Crocker.
Interest expense reflects incremental indebtedness of approximately
$97.4 million for the first half of 1996 at an average rate of 9.94%
and $57.8 million for the second half of 1996 at an average rate of
9.70% plus loan cost amortization of $292. Historical indebtedness was
also reduced by $20 million which was prepaid on December 28, 1995
using the proceeds of a private placement. The $20 million had a fixed
rate of interest of 11.5%. Depreciation is calculated using the
respective purchase prices allocated to buildings, site improvements
and tenant improvements with depreciation calculated on a
straight-line basis over useful lives of 40 years, 15 years, and the
life of the respective leases, respectively.
(h.) Reflects incremental rental income from a lease agreement entered into
in connection with the Merger. This agreement was a condition of the
Merger transaction.
(i.) Reflects the elimination of certain third-party leasing and property
management income of Crocker not retained by the Company.
(j.) Reflects the net adjustment to rental property expenses to eliminate
the costs related to certain assets (primarily land held for
development) that will be distributed to the current stockholders of
Crocker ($800,000) and for other property operating costs (primarily
personnel and office expenses related to duplicative property
management operations) which are expected to be eliminated upon the
completion of the Merger ($1,230,000).
(k.) Represents the net adjustment to depreciation expense based upon an
assumed allocation of the purchase price to land, buildings,
furniture, fixtures and equipment and development in process and
building depreciation computed on a straight-line basis using an
estimated life of 40 years for buildings and 7 years for furniture,
fixtures and equipment as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Eakin & Smith Transaction........................................................ $(145)
Merger........................................................................... (827)
Total.......................................................................... $(972)
</TABLE>
F-10
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS -- CONTINUED
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS -- Continued
(l.) Represents the net adjustment to interest expense to reflect interest
costs on borrowings under the Company's Credit Facility at an assumed
rate of 7.0% capped (the effective interest rate based on a 30-day
LIBOR rate of 5.50% plus 1.50%) and assumed debt as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Eakin & Smith Transaction (1)................................................... $2,667
Merger (2)...................................................................... 3,529
Total......................................................................... $6,196
</TABLE>
(1) $26,653,000 of borrowings under Credit Facility at 7% plus $10,075 of
assumed debt at 8.0%.
(2) $50,411,000 of borrowings at 7.0%.
(m.) Represents the amortization of the commitment fee ($937,000) on the
Credit Facility over the 36 month period.
(n.) Represents the net adjustment to general and administrative expense to
reflect the estimated incremental costs to the Company of operating a
Nashville division (primarily salaries) and to reflect the elimination
of certain costs (primarily executive salaries ($1,020,000),
administrative costs ($1,875,000), the expenses incurred to generate
third-party revenue ($994,000) and the expenses of operating as a
public entity $800,000) of Crocker not expected to be incurred by the
Company as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Eakin & Smith Transaction...................................................... $ 37
Merger......................................................................... (4,689)
Total........................................................................ $(4,652)
</TABLE>
(o.) Represents the net adjustment to minority interest to reflect the pro
forma minority interest percentage of 12.5%.
F-11
<PAGE>
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR
MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR
THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE
UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS
OF ANY SUCH STATE.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED JUNE 20, 1996
PROSPECTUS
$1,000,000,000
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK AND DEPOSITARY SHARES
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DEBT SECURITIES
Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the "Company") may from time to time offer in
one or more series (i) shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share ("Common
Stock"), (ii) shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share ("Preferred
Stock") and (iii) shares of Preferred Stock represented by depositary shares
(the "Depositary Shares"), with an aggregate public offering price of up to
$650,000,000 (or its equivalent in another currency based on the exchange rate
at the time of sale) in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined at the
time of offering. Highwoods/Forsyth Limited Partnership (the "Operating
Partnership") may from time to time offer in one or more series unsecured
non-convertible debt securities ("Debt Securities"), with an aggregate public
offering price of up to $350,000,000 (or its equivalent in another currency
based on the exchange rate at the time of sale) in amounts, at prices and on
terms to be determined at the time of offering. The Common Stock, Preferred
Stock, Depositary Shares and Debt Securities, (collectively, the "Securities")
may be offered, separately or together, in separate series in amounts, at prices
and on terms to be set forth in one or more supplements to this Prospectus (each
a "Prospectus Supplement"). If any Debt Securities issued by the Operating
Partnership are rated below investment grade at the time of issuance, such Debt
Securities will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company as to
payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest (the "Guarantees"). Debt
securities rated investment grade may also be accompanied by a Guarantee to the
extent and on the terms described herein and in the accompanying Prospectus
Supplement.The Company conducts substantially all of its activity through, and
all of its properties are held directly or indirectly by, the Operating
Partnership. Consequently, the Company's operating cash flow and its ability to
service its financial obligations, including the Guarantees, is dependent upon
the cash flow of and distributions or other payments from the Operating
Partnership to the Company.
The specific terms of the Securities in respect of which this Prospectus is
being delivered will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement and
will include, where applicable: (i) in the case of Common Stock, any initial
public offering price; (ii) in the case of Preferred Stock, the specific title
and stated value, any dividend, liquidation, redemption, conversion, voting and
other rights, and any initial public offering price; (iii) in the case of
Depositary Shares, the fractional share of Preferred Stock represented by each
such Depositary Share; and (iv) in the case of Debt Securities, the specific
title, aggregate principal amount, currency, form (which may be registered or
bearer, or certificated or global), authorized denominations, maturity, rate (or
manner of calculation thereof) and time of payment of interest, terms for
redemption at the option of the Operating Partnership or repayment at the option
of the holder, terms for sinking fund payments, covenants, applicability of any
Guarantees and any initial public offering price. In addition, such specific
terms may include limitations on direct or beneficial ownership and restrictions
on transfer of the Securities, in each case as may be appropriate to preserve
the status of the Company as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for Federal
income tax purposes.
The applicable Prospectus Supplement will also contain information, where
applicable, about certain United States Federal income tax considerations
relating to, and any listing on a securities exchange of, the Securities covered
by such Prospectus Supplement.
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 4 OF THIS PROSPECTUS FOR A DESCRIPTION
OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY PURCHASERS OF THE SECURITIES.
The Securities may be offered directly, through agents designated from time
to time by the Company or the Operating Partnership, or to or through
underwriters or dealers. If any agents or underwriters are involved in the sale
of any of the Securities, their names, and any applicable purchase price, fee,
commission or discount arrangement between or among them, will be set forth, or
will be calculable from the information set forth, in an accompanying Prospectus
Supplement. See "Plan of Distribution." No Securities may be sold without
delivery of a Prospectus Supplement describing the method and terms of the
offering of such series of Securities.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS
PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE
CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED
ON OR ENDORSED THE MERITS OF THIS OFFERING. ANY REPRE-
SENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
The date of this Prospectus is , 1996
<PAGE>
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company is, and upon effectiveness of this registration statement the
Operating Partnership will be, subject to the information requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in
accordance therewith the Company files reports, proxy statements and other
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and
the Operating Partnership will file reports with the Commission. Such reports,
proxy statements and other information may be inspected and copied, at
prescribed rates, at the public reference facilities of the Commission at 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 25049, Room 1024, and at the Commission's New
York regional office at Seven World Trade Center, New York, New York 10048 and
at the Commission's Chicago regional office at Citicorp Center, 500 W. Madison
Street, Chicago, Illinois 60661. Copies of such material can also be obtained at
prescribed rates by writing to the public reference section of the Commission at
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549. In addition, the Common Stock of
the Company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), and similar
information concerning the Company can be inspected and copied at the offices of
the NYSE, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
The Company and the Operating Partnership have filed with the Commission a
registration statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") under the
Securities Act, with respect to the Securities. This prospectus ("Prospectus"),
which constitutes a part of the Registration Statement, does not contain all of
the information set forth in the Registration Statement and in the exhibits and
schedules thereto. For further information with respect to the Company, the
Operating Partnership and the Securities, reference is hereby made to such
Registration Statement, exhibits and schedules. The Registration Statement may
be inspected without charge at, or copies obtained upon payment of prescribed
fees from, the Commission and its regional offices at the locations listed
above. Any statements contained herein concerning a provision of any document
are not necessarily complete, and, in each instance, reference is made to the
copy of such document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement or
otherwise filed with the Commission. Each such statement is qualified in its
entirety by such reference.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents filed by the Company (Commission File No. 1-13100)
with the Commission pursuant to the Exchange Act are incorporated herein by
reference and made a part hereof:
a. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995 (as amended on Form 10-K/A on June 3, 1996 and
June 18, 1996);
b. The description of the Common Stock of the Company included in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated May 16, 1994;
c. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1996 (as amended on Form 10-Q/A on June 3, 1996 and June
18, 1996) ; and
d. The Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K, dated February 10, 1995,
July 12, 1995 (as amended on Form 8-K/A on September 6, 1995 and
June 3, 1996), December 18, 1995, April 1, 1996 (as amended on Form
8-K/A on June 3, 1996 and June 18, 1996), and April 29, 1996 (as
amended on Form 8-K/A on June 3, 1996 and June 18, 1996).
All documents filed by the Company or the Operating Partnership with the
Commission pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 13(c) of the Exchange Act and any
definitive proxy statements so filed pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act
and any reports filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the
date of this Prospectus and prior to the termination of the offering of the
Securities to which this Prospectus relates shall be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into this Prospectus and to be a part hereof from the date of
filing of such documents. Any statement contained in a document incorporated by
reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for the purposes
of this Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein or in any
other subsequently filed document that is incorporated by reference herein
modifies or supersedes such earlier statement. Any such statements modified or
superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to
constitute a part of this Prospectus.
Copies of any or all of the documents specifically incorporated herein by
reference (not including the exhibits to such documents, unless such exhibits
are specifically incorporated by reference in such documents) will be furnished
without charge to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom a copy of
this Prospectus is delivered upon written or oral request. Requests should be
made to: Investor Relations, 3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27604.
2
<PAGE>
THE COMPANY AND THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
The Company is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment
trust ("REIT") that began operations through a predecessor in 1978. At May 31,
1996, the Company owned a portfolio of 200 office and industrial properties (the
"Properties"), together with approximately 215 acres of land (the "Development
Land") for future development. The Properties consist of 102 suburban office
properties and 98 industrial (including 62 service center) properties, located
in Raleigh-Durham, Winston-Salem, Greensboro and Charlotte, North Carolina,
Nashville, Tennessee and Richmond, Virginia. As of May 31, 1996, the Properties
consisted of approximately 10.3 million square feet, which were leased to
approximately 1,100 tenants.
The Company conducts substantially all of its activities through, and all
of the Properties are held directly or indirectly by, Highwoods/Forsyth Limited
Partnership (the "Operating Partnership"). The Company is the sole general
partner of the Operating Partnership and as of May 31, 1996, owned 82% of the
partnership interests (the "Units") in the Operating Partnership. The remaining
Units are owned by limited partners (including certain officers and directors of
the Company). Each Unit may be redeemed by the holder thereof for cash or, at
the Company's option, one share (subject to certain adjustments) of the Common
Stock. With each such exchange, the number of Units owned by the Company and,
therefore, the Company's percentage interest in the Operating Partnership, will
increase. Because the Company conducts substantially all of its activity
through, and all of its properties are held directly or indirectly by, the
Operating Partnership, the description of the business, property information,
policies with respect to certain activities, investment policies and management
information for the Operating Partnership are the same as the Company. Such
information may be found in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995.
The only businesses or assets of the Company which are not conducted or
owned directly or indirectly through the Operating Partnership are the brokerage
and property management business and related assets acquired on April 1, 1996
through the Company's merger with Nashville, Tennessee-based Eakin & Smith, Inc.
(the "Eakin & Smith Transaction"). In addition to owning the Properties and the
Development Land, the Operating Partnership also provides services associated
with leasing, property management, real estate development, construction and
miscellaneous tenant services for the Properties as well as for third parties.
The Company conducts its third-party fee-based services through two subsidiaries
of the Operating Partnership, Highwoods Services, Inc. and Forsyth Properties
Services, Inc. (the "Service Companies"), and Forsyth-Carter Brokerage L.L.C.
("Forsyth-Carter Brokerage"), a joint venture with Carter Oncor International.
On April 29, 1996, the Company entered into a merger agreement (the "Merger
Agreement") with Crocker Realty Trust, Inc. ("Crocker") pursuant to which the
Company will acquire 58 suburban office properties and 12 service center
properties (the "Crocker Properties") located in 15 Southeastern markets in
Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia and
Alabama. The Crocker Properties encompass 5.7 million rentable square feet and,
at March 31, 1996, were 95% leased. Through the merger with Crocker (the
"Merger"), which is expected to occur in the third quarter of 1996, the Company
will establish itself as one of the largest real estate operating companies in
the Southeastern United States specializing in the ownership, management,
acquisition and development of suburban office and industrial properties. Under
the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company will acquire all of the
outstanding capital stock of Crocker in exchange for a cash payment of $11.02
per share, subject to certain adjustments. Based on Crocker's 26,981,087 million
shares of outstanding capital stock at May 31, 1996, the purchase price will
total approximately $297 million. In addition, the Company will cash out certain
existing options and warrants to purchase Crocker common stock for an estimated
$4.2 million and assume approximately $240 million of Crocker's currently
outstanding indebtedness, having a weighted average interest rate of 8.6%. In
connection with the Merger, the Company has also entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with certain stockholders of Crocker,
who together own approximately 83% of Crocker's outstanding common stock
(collectively, the "Crocker Selling Stockholders"), which obligates such
stockholders to sell their shares to the Company at a cash price of $11.02,
subject to the same adjustments as required under the Merger Agreement. The
approximately $247 million purchase price for such shares is part of the total
approximately $297 million purchase price for all of Crocker's outstanding
shares. The Merger Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement may be terminated
by the respective parties only in certain limited circumstances. In addition,
under the terms of the Merger Agreement, certain specified assets and
liabilities of Crocker will not be acquired by the Company. The Merger will be
accounted for by
3
<PAGE>
the Company under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16, "Business Combinations," as amended.
Under this method of accounting, the purchase price will be allocated to assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value at the
closing date of the Merger.
The Company is a Maryland corporation that was incorporated in 1994. The
Operating Partnership is a North Carolina limited partnership formed in 1994.
The Company's and the Operating Partnership's executive offices are located at
3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604, and their
telephone number is (919) 872-4924. The Company maintains offices in each of its
primary markets.
RISK FACTORS
Prospective investors should carefully consider, among other factors, the
matters described below before purchasing offered Securities.
NO LIMITATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENTS ON INCURRENCE OF DEBT
The Company intends to limit the extent of its borrowing to less than 50%
of its total market capitalization (i.e., the market value of issued and
outstanding shares of Common Stock and Units plus total debt), but the
organizational documents of the Company do not contain any limitation on the
amount or percentage of indebtedness the Company might incur. The Indenture (as
defined herein), however, will contain limits on the Company's ability to incur
indebtedness. If the Company's policy limiting borrowing were changed, the
Company could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt
service that could adversely affect the Company's funds from operations and
ability to make expected distributions to stockholders and in an increased risk
of default on its obligations. As of May 31, 1996, the Company's ratio of debt
to total market capitalization was approximately 28%.
GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION
The Company's revenues and the value of its Properties may be affected by a
number of factors, including the local economic climate (which may be adversely
impacted by business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing
demographics and other factors) and local real estate conditions (such as
oversupply of or reduced demand for office and other competing commercial
properties). As of May 31, 1996, the Properties were located in the following
areas (with the number of Properties noted parenthetically): Raleigh-Durham,
North Carolina (60); Greensboro, Winston-Salem and High Point, North Carolina
(100); Charlotte, North Carolina (22); Richmond, Virginia (11); and Nashville,
Tennessee (7). Using March 1996 base rent totals, the North Carolina properties
represented 87.5% of the annualized base rent of the Properties, with
Raleigh-Durham Properties alone constituting 53.1%. Although the Merger would
broaden the Company's geographic focus by adding 11 new markets throughout the
Southeastern United States, based on March 1996 rent rolls, the North Carolina
Properties would still represent 56.4% of the Company's annualized rental
revenue, with properties located in Raleigh-Durham accounting for 31.8%
following the Merger. The Company's performance and its ability to make
distributions to stockholders is therefore dependent on the economic conditions
in these market areas. In addition, there can be no assurance as to the
continued growth of the economy in these markets.
ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO PAY ON GUARANTEES
With the exception of the Nashville, Tennessee brokerage and property
management operations, all other operations of the Company are conducted by the
Operating Partnership. The principal asset of the Company is its interest (82%
as of May 31, 1996) in the Operating Partnership. As a result, the Company is
dependent upon the receipt of distributions or other payments from the Operating
Partnership in order to meet its financial obligations, including its
obligations under any Guarantees. Any Guarantees will be effectively
subordinated to existing and future liabilities of the Operating Partnership. At
May 31, 1996, the Operating Partnership had approximately $275 million of
indebtedness outstanding, of which approximately $207 million is secured by
interests in certain real estate assets. The Operating Partnership is a party to
loan agreements with various bank lenders which require the Operating
Partnership to comply with various financial and other covenants before it may
make distributions to the Company. Although the Operating
4
<PAGE>
Partnership presently is in compliance with such covenants, there is no
assurance that it will continue to be in compliance and that it will be able to
continue to make distributions to the Company.
RISKS IN THE EVENT OF CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS BY THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP OR THE
COMPANY
The Indenture does not contain any provisions that would afford holders of
Debt Securities protection in the event of (i) a highly leveraged or similar
transaction involving the Operating Partnership, the management of the Operating
Partnership or the Company, or any affiliate of any such party, (ii) a change of
control, or (iii) certain reorganizations, restructures, mergers or similar
transactions involving the Operating Partnership or the Company.
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS IN THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
TAX CONSEQUENCES UPON SALE OR REFINANCING OF PROPERTIES. Holders of Units
may suffer different and more adverse tax consequences than the Company upon the
sale or refinancing of any of the Properties and, therefore, such holders,
including certain of the Company's officers and directors, and the Company may
have different objectives regarding the appropriate pricing and timing of any
sale or refinancing of such Properties. While the Company, as the sole general
partner of the Operating Partnership, has the exclusive authority as to whether
and on what terms to sell or refinance an individual Property, those members of
the Company's management and Board of Directors of the Company who hold Units
may influence the Company not to sell or refinance the Properties even though
such sale might otherwise be financially advantageous to the Company, or may
influence the Company to refinance Properties with a high level of debt.
POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS. The Company has adopted
certain policies relating to conflicts of interest. These policies include a
bylaw provision requiring all transactions in which executive officers or
directors have a conflicting interest to be approved by a majority of the
independent directors of the Company or a majority of the shares of capital
stock held by disinterested stockholders. There can be no assurance that the
Company's policies will be successful in eliminating the influence of such
conflicts, and if they are not successful, decisions could be made that might
fail to reflect fully the interests of all stockholders.
COMPETITIVE REAL ESTATE ACTIVITIES OF MANAGEMENT. John W. Eakin and Thomas
S. Smith, both of whom became officers and directors of the Company in
connection with the Eakin & Smith Transaction, maintain an ownership interest in
an office building in the central business district of Nashville, Tennessee,
which building may compete for potential tenants with the Company's Nashville
office properties.
LIMITATIONS ON ACQUISITION AND CHANGE IN CONTROL
OWNERSHIP LIMIT. The Company's Articles of Incorporation prohibit ownership
of more than 9.8% of the outstanding capital stock of the Company by any person.
Such restriction is likely to have the effect of precluding acquisition of
control of the Company by a third party without consent of the Board of
Directors even if a change in control were in the interest of stockholders.
REQUIRED CONSENT OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP FOR MERGER OR OTHER
SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE ACTION. The Company may not merge, consolidate or engage
in any combination with another person or sell all or substantially all of its
assets unless such transaction includes the merger of the Operating Partnership,
which requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Units. Should the Company ever own less than a majority of the outstanding
Units, this voting requirement might limit the possibility for acquisition or
change in the control of the Company. As of May 31, 1996, the Company owned
approximately 82% of the Units.
STAGGERED BOARD. The Board of Directors of the Company has three classes of
directors, the terms of which will expire in 1996, 1997 and 1998. Directors for
each class will be chosen for a three-year term. The staggered terms for
directors may affect the stockholders' ability to change control of the Company
even if a change in control were in the stockholders' interest.
5
<PAGE>
DEPENDENCE ON DISTRIBUTIONS FROM OPERATING PARTNERSHIP IN ORDER TO QUALIFY AS A
REIT
To obtain the favorable tax treatment associated with REITs, the Company
generally will be required each year to distribute to its stockholders at least
95% of its net taxable income. Because the Company conducts substantially all of
its business activities through the Operating Partnership, the ability of the
Company to make such distributions is dependent upon the receipt of
distributions or other payments from the Operating Partnership.
ADVERSE IMPACT ON DISTRIBUTIONS OF FAILURE TO QUALIFY AS A REIT
The Company and the Operating Partnership intend to operate in a manner so
as to permit the Company to remain qualified as a REIT under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Although the Company believes
that it will operate in such a manner, no assurance can be given that the
Company will remain qualified as a REIT. If in any taxable year the Company were
to fail to qualify as a REIT, the Company would not be allowed a deduction for
distributions to stockholders in computing taxable income and would be subject
to Federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its
taxable income at regular corporate rates.
BROAD DISCRETION IN USE OF PROCEEDS
The Company and the Operating Partnership may use the proceeds from sales
of Securities for many different purposes and will not be restricted by any
provisions of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company or the agreement of
limited partnership of the Operating Partnership. As a result, no assurance can
be given that such proceeds will be employed in a manner consistent with the
current investment practices of the Company and the Operating Partnership.
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT RISKS
GENERAL RISKS. Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of
risk. The yields available from equity investments in real estate depend in
large part on the amount of income generated and expenses incurred. If the
Company's properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet operating
expenses, including debt service, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and
other capital expenditures, the Company may have to borrow additional amounts to
cover fixed costs and the Company's cash flow and ability to make distributions
to its stockholders will be adversely affected.
The Company's revenues and the value of its properties may be adversely
affected by a number of factors, including the national economic climate; the
local economic climate; local real estate conditions; the perceptions of
prospective tenants of the attractiveness of the property; the ability of the
Company to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance; and increased
operating costs (including real estate taxes and utilities). In addition, real
estate values and income from properties are also affected by such factors as
applicable laws, including tax laws, interest rate levels and the availability
of financing.
COMPETITION. Numerous office and industrial properties compete with the
Company's properties in attracting tenants to lease space. Some of these
competing properties are newer or better located than some of the Company's
properties. Significant development of office or industrial properties in a
particular area could have a material effect on the Company's ability to lease
space in its properties and on the rents charged.
BANKRUPTCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION OF TENANTS. At any time, a tenant of the
Company's Properties may seek the protection of the bankruptcy laws, which could
result in the rejection and termination of such tenant's lease and thereby cause
a reduction in the cash flow available for distribution by the Company. Although
the Company has not experienced material losses from tenant bankruptcies, no
assurance can be given that tenants will not file for bankruptcy protection in
the future or, if any tenants file, that they will affirm their leases and
continue to make rental payments in a timely manner. In addition, a tenant from
time to time may experience a downturn in its business which may weaken its
financial condition and result in the failure to make rental payments when due.
If tenant leases are not affirmed following bankruptcy or if a tenant's
financial condition weakens, the Company's income may be adversely affected.
6
<PAGE>
RENEWAL OF LEASES AND RELETTING OF SPACE. The Company will be subject to
the risks that upon expiration of leases for space located in its properties,
the leases may not be renewed, the space may not be relet or the terms of
renewal or reletting (including the cost of required renovations) may be less
favorable than current lease terms. If the Company were unable to promptly relet
or renew the leases for all or a substantial portion of this space or if the
rental rates upon such renewal or reletting were significantly lower than
expected rates, then the Company's cash flow and ability to make expected
distributions to stockholders may be adversely affected.
ILLIQUIDITY OF REAL ESTATE. Equity real estate investments are relatively
illiquid. Such illiquidity will tend to limit the ability of the Company to vary
its portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.
In addition, the Code limits the Company's ability to sell properties held for
fewer than four years, which may affect the Company's ability to sell properties
without adversely affecting returns to holders of Common Stock.
CHANGES IN LAWS. Because increases in income, service or transfer taxes are
generally not passed through to tenants under leases, such increases may
adversely affect the Company's cash flow and its ability to make distributions
to stockholders. The Properties are also subject to various Federal, state and
local regulatory requirements, such as requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act and state and local fire and life safety requirements. Failure
to comply with these requirements could result in the imposition of fines by
governmental authorities or awards of damages to private litigants. The Company
believes that the Properties are currently in compliance with all such
regulatory requirements. However, there can be no assurance that these
requirements will not be changed or that new requirements will not be imposed
which would require significant unanticipated expenditures by the Company and
could have an adverse effect on the Company's cash flow and expected
distributions.
CONSEQUENCES OF INABILITY TO SERVICE MORTGAGE DEBT. Pursuant to loan
agreements with bank lenders, a portion of the Properties are mortgaged to
secure payment of such indebtedness, and if the Company or the Operating
Partnership were to be unable to meet such payments, a loss could be sustained
as a result of foreclosure on the Properties by the bank lenders.
RISK OF DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION ACTIVITIES
The Company intends to actively continue development and construction of
office and industrial properties, including development on the Development Land.
Risks associated with the Company's development and construction activities,
including activities relating to the Development Land, may include: abandonment
of development opportunities; construction costs of a property exceeding
original estimates, possibly making the property uneconomical; occupancy rates
and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the
property profitable; financing may not be available on favorable terms for
development of a property; and construction and lease-up may not be completed on
schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs. In
addition, new development activities, regardless of whether or not they are
ultimately successful, typically require a substantial portion of management's
time and attention. Development activities are also subject to risks relating to
the inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use,
building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits and authorizations.
The Company intends to actively continue to acquire office and industrial
properties. Acquisitions of office and industrial properties entail risks that
investments will fail to perform in accordance with expectations. Estimates of
the costs of improvements to bring an acquired property up to standards
established for the market position intended for that property may prove
inaccurate. In addition, there are general investment risks associated with any
new real estate investment.
Although the Company has limited its development, acquisition, management
and leasing business primarily to markets with which management is familiar, the
Company may expand its business to new geographic markets. Management believes
that much of its past success has been a result of its local expertise. The
Company may not initially possess the same level of familiarity with new
markets, which could adversely affect its ability to develop, acquire, manage or
lease properties in any new localities.
7
<PAGE>
POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES
Under various Federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations,
such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
or "CERCLA," and common laws, an owner or operator of real estate is liable for
the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on
or in such property as well as certain other costs, including governmental fines
and injuries to persons and property. Such laws often impose such liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of such
substances, or the failure to remediate such substances properly, may adversely
affect the owner's or operator's ability to sell or rent such property or to
borrow using such property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal
or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs
of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment
facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person.
Certain environmental laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing
materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or
operators of real property for personal injuries associated with
asbestos-containing materials.
As of the date hereof, all but one of the Properties had been subjected to
a Phase I environmental assessment. These assessments have not revealed, nor is
management of the Company aware of, any environmental liability that it believes
would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position,
operations or liquidity taken as a whole. This projection, however, could prove
to be incorrect depending on certain factors. For example, the Company's
assessments may not reveal all environmental liabilities or there may be
material environmental liabilities of which the Company is unaware. In addition,
assumptions regarding groundwater flow and the existence of contamination are
based on available sampling data, and there are no assurances that the data is
reliable in all cases. Moreover, there can be no assurance that (i) future laws,
ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability
or (ii) the current environmental condition of the Properties will not be
affected by tenants, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of
the Properties (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third
parties unrelated to the Company.
Some tenants use or generate hazardous substances in the ordinary course of
their respective businesses. These tenants are required under their leases to
comply with all applicable laws and have agreed to indemnify the Company for any
claims resulting from noncompliance, and the Company is not aware of any
environmental problems resulting from tenants' use or generation of hazardous
substances. There are no assurances that all tenants will comply with the terms
of their leases or remain solvent and that the Company may not at some point be
responsible for contamination caused by such tenants.
EFFECT ON COMMON STOCK PRICE OF SHARES AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE SALE UPON CONVERSION
OF UNITS
Sales of a substantial number of shares of Common Stock, or the perception
that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices of
the Common Stock. In connection with the Company's initial formation and public
offering and certain subsequent acquisitions, as of the date hereof,
approximately 4.2 million Units have been issued to various holders, including
certain officers and directors of the Company. In connection with the issuance
of Units, each holder thereof agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose of such
Units or shares of Common Stock received upon exchange of such Units for a
period of one year. At the conclusion of such period, any shares of Common Stock
issued upon exchange of Units may be sold in the public markets upon
registration or available exemptions from registration. No prediction can be
made about the effect that future sales of Common Stock will have on the market
price of shares. At May 31, 1996, the one-year lock-up period with respect to
3.4 million Units had expired.
8
<PAGE>
USE OF PROCEEDS
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the
Company and the Operating Partnership intend to use the net proceeds from the
sale of Securities for general corporate purposes, including the development and
acquisition of additional properties and other acquisition transactions, the
payment of certain outstanding debt, and improvements to certain properties in
the Company's portfolio. The Company is required, by the terms of the
partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, to invest the net proceeds
of any sale of Common Stock, Preferred Stock or Depositary Shares in the
Operating Partnership in exchange for additional Units or preferred Units, as
the case may be.
RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
The ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends for the Company and the Operating Partnership for the three months
ended March 31, 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992
and 1991 were 2.93x, 3.00x, 2.42x, 0.97x, 0.95x and 0.79x, respectively.
Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $171,000, $239,000 and
$913,000 for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
These deficiencies occurred prior to the Company's initial public offering of
Common Stock in June 1994. Prior to the completion of this offering, the
Company's predecessor (the "Highwoods Group") operated in a manner as to
minimize taxable income to the owners. As a result, although the Properties have
generated positive net cash flow, the Highwoods Group had net losses for the
years ended December 31, 1991 through 1993. The initial public offering allowed
the Operating Partnership to significantly deleverage the Properties and improve
its ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
The ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges were computed by dividing
earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of income from
continuing operations before minority interest and fixed charges. Fixed charges
consist of interest expense (including interest costs capitalized) and the
amortization of debt issuance costs. To date, the Company has not issued any
Preferred Stock.
DESCRIPTION OF DEBT SECURITIES
The Debt Securities will be issued under an Indenture (the "Indenture"),
between the Operating Partnership, the Company and a trustee to be named prior
to the first issuance of Debt Securities. A form of the Indenture has been filed
as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part
and will be available for inspection at the corporate trust office of the
trustee or as described above under "Available Information." The Indenture is
subject to, and governed by, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the
"TIA"). The statements made hereunder relating to the Indenture and the Debt
Securities to be issued thereunder are summaries of certain provisions thereof
and do not purport to be complete and are subject to, and are qualified in their
entirety by reference to, all provisions of the Indenture and such Debt
Securities. All section references appearing herein are to sections of the
Indenture, and capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
respective meanings set forth in the Indenture.
GENERAL
The Debt Securities will be direct, unsecured obligations of the Operating
Partnership and will rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated
indebtedness of the Operating Partnership. At May 31, 1996, the total
outstanding debt of the Operating Partnership was $275 million, $207 million of
which was secured debt. The Debt Securities may be issued without limit as to
aggregate principal amount, in one or more series, in each case as established
from time to time in or pursuant to authority granted by a resolution of the
Board of Directors of the Company as sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership or as established in one or more indentures supplemental to the
Indenture. All Debt Securities of one series need not be issued at the same time
and, unless otherwise provided, a series may be reopened, without the consent of
the holders of the Debt Securities of such series, for issuances of additional
Debt Securities of such series (Section 301).
9
<PAGE>
If any Debt Securities are rated below investment grade at the time of
issuance, such Debt Securities will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by
the Company as to payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest.
The Indenture provides that there may be more than one trustee (the
"Trustee") thereunder, each with respect to one or more series of Debt
Securities. Any Trustee under the Indenture may resign or be removed with
respect to one or more series of Debt Securities, and a successor Trustee may be
appointed to act with respect to such series (Section 608). In the event that
two or more persons are acting as Trustee with respect to different series of
Debt Securities, each such Trustee shall be a trustee of a trust under the
Indenture separate and apart from the trust administered by any other Trustee
(Section 609), and, except as otherwise indicated herein, any action described
herein to be taken by a Trustee may be taken by each such Trustee with respect
to, and only with respect to, the one or more series of Debt Securities for
which it is Trustee under the Indenture.
Reference is made to the Prospectus Supplement relating to the series of
Debt Securities being offered for the specific terms thereof, including:
(1) the title of such Debt Securities;
(2) the aggregate principal amount of such Debt Securities and any limit
on such aggregate principal amount;
(3) the percentage of the principal amount at which such Debt Securities
will be issued and, if other than the principal amount thereof, the
portion of the principal amount thereof payable upon declaration of
acceleration of the maturity thereof;
(4) the date or dates, or the method for determining such date or dates,
on which the principal of such Debt Securities will be payable;
(5) the rate or rates (which may be fixed or variable), or the method by
which such rate or rates shall be determined, at which such Debt
Securities will bear interest, if any;
(6) the date or dates, or the method for determining such date or dates,
from which any interest will accrue, the dates on which any such
interest will be payable, the record dates for such interest payment
dates, or the method by which any such date shall be determined, the
person to whom such interest shall be payable, and the basis upon
which interest shall be calculated if other than that of a 360-day
year of twelve 30-day months;
(7) the place or places where the principal of (and premium, if any) and
interest, if any, on such Debt Securities will be payable, such Debt
Securities may be surrendered for registration of transfer or exchange
and notices or demands to or upon the Operating Partnership in respect
of such Debt Securities and the Indenture may be served;
(8) the period or periods within which, the price or prices at which and
the terms and conditions upon which such Debt Securities may be
redeemed, as a whole or in part, at the option of the Operating
Partnership, if the Operating Partnership is to have such an option;
(9) the obligation, if any, of the Operating Partnership to redeem, repay
or purchase such Debt Securities pursuant to any sinking fund or
analogous provision or at the option of a holder thereof, and the
period or periods within which, the price or prices at which and the
terms and conditions upon which such Debt Securities will be redeemed,
repaid or purchased, as a whole or in part, pursuant to such
obligation;
(10) if other than U.S. dollars, the currency or currencies in which such
Debt Securities are denominated and payable, which may be a foreign
currency or units of two or more foreign currencies or a composite
currency or currencies, and the terms and conditions relating thereto;
(11) whether the amount of payments of principal of (and premium, if any)
or interest, if any, on such Debt Securities may be determined with
reference to an index, formula or other method (which index, formula
or method may, but need not be, based on a currency, currencies,
currency unit or
10
<PAGE>
units or composite currency or currencies) and the manner in which
such amounts shall be determined;
(12) the events of default or covenants of such Debt Securities, to the
extent different from or in addition to those described herein;
(13) whether such Debt Securities will be issued in certificated and/or
book-entry form;
(14) whether such Debt Securities will be in registered or bearer form and,
if in registered form, the denominations thereof if other than $1,000
and any integral multiple thereof and, if in bearer form, the
denominations thereof if other than $5,000 and terms and conditions
relating thereto;
(15) with respect to any series of Debt Securities rated below investment
grade at the time of issuance, the Guarantees (the "Guaranteed
Securities");
(16) if the defeasance and covenant defeasance provisions described herein
are to be inapplicable or any modification of such provisions;
(17) whether and under what circumstances the Operating Partnership will
pay additional amounts on such Debt Securities in respect of any tax,
assessment or governmental charge and, if so, whether the Operating
Partnership will have the option to redeem such Debt Securities in
lieu of making such payment;
(18) with respect to any Debt Securities that provide for optional
redemption or prepayment upon the occurrence of certain events (such
as a change of control of the Operating Partnership), (i) the possible
effects of such provisions on the market price of the Operating
Partnership's or the Company's securities or in deterring certain
mergers, tender offers or other takeover attempts, and the intention
of the Operating Partnership to comply with the requirements of
Regulation 14E under the Exchange Act and any other applicable
securities laws in connection with such provisions; (ii) whether the
occurrence of the specified events may give rise to cross-defaults on
other indebtedness such that payment on such Debt Securities may be
effectively subordinated; and (iii) the existence of any limitation on
the Operating Partnership's financial or legal ability to repurchase
such Debt Securities upon the occurrence of such an event (including,
if true, the lack of assurance that such a repurchase can be effected)
and the impact, if any, under the Indenture of such a failure,
including whether and under what circumstances such a failure may
constitute an Event of Default;
(19) if other than the Trustee, the identify of each security registrar
and/or paying agent; and
(20) any other terms of such Debt Securities.
The Debt Securities may provide for less than the entire principal amount
thereof to be payable upon declaration of acceleration of the maturity thereof
("Original Issue Discount Securities"). If material or applicable, special U.S.
Federal income tax, accounting and other considerations applicable to Original
Issue Discount Securities will be described in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement.
Except as described under "Merger, Consolidation or Sale" or as may be set
forth in any Prospectus Supplement, the Indenture does not contain any other
provisions that would limit the ability of the Operating Partnership to incur
indebtedness or that would afford holders of the Debt Securities protection in
the event of (i) a highly leveraged or similar transaction involving the
Operating Partnership, the management of the Operating Partnership or the
Company, or any affiliate of any such party, (ii) a change of control, or (iii)
a reorganization, restructuring, merger or similar transaction involving the
Operating Partnership that may adversely affect the holders of the Debt
Securities. In addition, subject to the limitations set forth under "Merger,
Consolidation or Sale," the Operating Partnership or the Company may, in the
future, enter into certain transactions, such as the sale of all or
substantially all of its assets or the merger or consolidation of the Operating
Partnership or the Company, that would increase the amount of the Operating
Partnership's indebtedness or substantially reduce or eliminate the Operating
Partnership's assets, which may have an adverse effect on the Operating
Partnership's ability to service its indebtedness, including the Debt
Securities. In addition, restrictions on ownership and transfers of the
Company's common stock and preferred stock which are designed to preserve its
status as a REIT may act to prevent or hinder a change of control.
11
<PAGE>
See "Description of Common Stock -- Certain Provisions Affecting Change of
Control" and "Description of Preferred Stock -- Restrictions on Ownership."
Reference is made to the applicable Prospectus Supplement for information with
respect to any deletions from, modifications of or additions to the events of
default or covenants that are described below, including any addition of a
covenant or other provision providing event risk or similar protection.
Reference is made to " -- Certain Covenants" below and to the description
of any additional covenants with respect to a series of Debt Securities in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement. Except as otherwise described in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement, compliance with such covenants generally may
not be waived with respect to a series of Debt Securities by the Board of
Directors of the Company as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership or
by the Trustee unless the Holders of at least majority in principal amount of
all outstanding Debt Securities of such series consent to such waiver, except to
the extent that the defeasance and covenant defeasance provisions of the
Indenture described under " -- Discharge, Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance"
below apply to such series of Debt Securities. See " -- Modification of the
Indenture."
GUARANTEES
The Company will fully, unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee the due
and punctual payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on any Debt
Securities rated below investment grade at the time of issuance by the Operating
Partnership, and the due and punctual payment of any sinking fund payments
thereon, when and as the same shall become due and payable, whether at a
maturity date, by declaration of acceleration, call for redemption or otherwise.
In addition, Debt Securities rated investment grade may also be accompanied by a
Guarantee to the extent and on the terms described in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement.
DENOMINATIONS, INTEREST, REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER
Unless otherwise described in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the
Debt Securities of any series which are registered securities, other than
registered securities issued in global form (which may be of any denomination),
shall be issuable in denominations of $1,000 and any integral multiple thereof
and the Debt Securities which are bearer securities, other than bearer
securities issued in global form (which may be of any denomination), shall be
issuable in denominations of $5,000 (Section 302).
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the
principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on any series of Debt Securities
will be payable at the corporate trust office of the Trustee, provided that, at
the option of the Operating Partnership, payment of interest may be made by
check mailed to the address of the Person entitled thereto as it appears in the
applicable Security Register or by wire transfer of funds to such Person at an
account maintained within the United States (Sections 301, 307 and 1002).
Any interest not punctually paid or duly provided for on any Interest
Payment Date with respect to a Debt Security ("Defaulted Interest") will
forthwith cease to be payable to the Holder on the applicable Regular Record
Date and may either be paid to the Person in whose name such Debt Security is
registered at the close of business on a special record date (the "Special
Record Date") for the payment of such Defaulted Interest to be fixed by the
Trustee, notice whereof shall be given to the Holder of such Debt Security not
less than 10 days prior to such Special Record Date, or may be paid at any time
in any other lawful manner, all as more completely described in the Indenture.
Subject to certain limitations imposed upon Debt Securities issued in
book-entry form, the Debt Securities of any series will be exchangeable for
other Debt Securities of the same series and of a like aggregate principal
amount and tenor of different authorized denominations upon surrender of such
Debt Securities at the corporate trust office of the Trustee referred to above.
In addition, subject to certain limitations imposed upon Debt Securities issued
in book-entry form, the Debt Securities of any series may be surrendered for
registration of transfer thereof at the corporate trust office of the Trustee
referred to above. Every Debt Security surrendered for registration of transfer
or exchange shall be duly endorsed or accompanied by a written instrument of
transfer. No service charge will be made for any registration of transfer or
exchange of any Debt Securities, but the Trustee or the Operating Partnership
may require payment of a sum sufficient to
12
<PAGE>
cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection therewith
(Section 305). If the applicable Prospectus Supplement refers to any transfer
agent (in addition to the Trustee) initially designated by the Operating
Partnership with respect to any series of Debt Securities, the Operating
Partnership may at any time rescind the designation of any such transfer agent
or approve a change in the location through which any such transfer agent acts,
except that Operating Partnership will be required to maintain a transfer agent
in each place of payment for such series. The Operating Partnership may at any
time designate additional transfer agents with respect to any series of Debt
Securities (Section 1002).
Neither the Operating Partnership nor the Trustee shall be required (i) to
issue, register the transfer of or exchange any Debt Security if such Debt
Security may be among those selected for redemption during a period beginning at
the opening of business 15 days before selection of the Debt Securities to be
redeemed and ending at the close of business on the day of such selection, or
(ii) to register the transfer of or exchange any Registered Security so selected
for redemption in whole or in part, except, in the case of any Registered
Security to be redeemed in part, the portion thereof not to be redeemed, or
(iii) to exchange any Bearer Security so selected for redemption except that
such a Bearer Security may be exchanged for a Registered Security of that series
and like tenor, provided that such Registered Security shall be simultaneously
surrendered for redemption, or (iv) to issue, register the transfer of or
exchange any Security which has been surrendered for repayment at the option of
the Holder, except the portion, if any, of such Debt Security not to be so
repaid (Section 305).
MERGER, CONSOLIDATION OR SALE
The Operating Partnership or the Company may consolidate with, or sell,
lease or convey all or substantially all of its assets to, or merge with or
into, any other entity, provided that (a) the Operating Partnership or the
Company, as the case may be, shall be the continuing entity, or the successor
entity (if other than the Operating Partnership or the Company, as the case may
be) formed by or resulting from any such consolidation or merger or which shall
have received the transfer of such assets shall expressly assume payment of the
principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on all the Debt Securities and
the due and punctual performance and observance of all of the covenants and
conditions contained in the Indenture; (b) immediately after giving effect to
such transaction, no Event of Default under the Indenture, and no event which,
after notice or the lapse of time, or both, would become such an Event of
Default, shall have occurred and be continuing; and (c) an officer's certificate
and legal opinion covering such conditions shall be delivered to the Trustee
(Sections 801 and 803).
CERTAIN COVENANTS
LIMITATIONS ON INCURRENCE OF DEBT. The Operating Partnership will not, and
will not permit any Subsidiary to, incur any Debt (as defined below), other than
intercompany debt (representing Debt to which the only parties are the Company,
the Operating Partnership and any of their Subsidiaries (but only so long as
such Debt is held solely by any of the Company, the Operating Partnership and
any Subsidiary) that is subordinate in right of payment to the Debt Securities)
if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of such additional Debt,
the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding Debt of the Operating
Partnership and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis determined in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles is greater than 60% of
the sum of (i) the Operating Partnership's Total Assets (as defined below) as of
the end of the calendar quarter covered in the Operating Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as the case may be, most
recently filed with the Commission (or, if such filing is not permitted under
the Exchange Act, with the Trustee) prior to the incurrence of such additional
Debt and (ii) the increase in Total Assets from the end of such quarter
including, without limitation, any increase in Total Assets resulting from the
incurrence of such additional Debt (such increase together with the Operating
Partnership's Total Assets shall be referred to as the "Adjusted Total Assets")
(Section 1011).
In addition to the foregoing limitations on the incurrence of Debt, the
Operating Partnership will not, and will not permit any Subsidiary to, incur any
Debt secured by any mortgage, lien, charge, pledge, encumbrance or security
interest of any kind upon any of the property of the Operating Partnership, or
any Subsidiary ("Secured Debt"), whether owned at the date of the Indenture or
thereafter acquired, if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of
such additional Secured Debt, the aggregate principal amount of all
13
<PAGE>
outstanding Secured Debt of the Operating Partnership and its Subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis is greater than 40% of the Operating Partnership's Adjusted
Total Assets (Section 1011).
In addition to the foregoing limitations on the incurrence of Debt, the
Operating Partnership will not, and will not permit any Subsidiary to, incur any
Debt if the ratio of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to the
Annual Service Charge (in each case as defined below) for the four consecutive
fiscal quarters most recently ended prior to the date on which such additional
Debt is to be incurred shall have been less than 1.5 to 1.0 on a pro forma basis
after giving effect to the incurrence of such Debt and to the application of the
proceeds therefrom, and calculated on the assumption that (i) such Debt and any
other Debt incurred by the Operating Partnership or its Subsidiaries since the
first day of such four-quarter period and the application of the proceeds
therefrom, including to refinance other Debt, had occurred at the beginning of
such period, (ii) the repayment or retirement of any other Debt by the Operating
Partnership or its Subsidiaries since the first day of such four-quarter period
had been incurred, repaid or retired at the beginning of such period (except
that, in making such computation, the amount of Debt under any revolving credit
facility shall be computed based upon the average daily balance of such Debt
during such period), (iii) the income earned on any increase in Adjusted Total
Assets since the end of such four-quarter period had been earned, on an
annualized basis, during such period, and (iv) in the case of any acquisition or
disposition by the Operating Partnership or any Subsidiary of any asset or group
of assets since the first day of such four-quarter period, including, without
limitation, by merger, stock purchase or sale, or asset purchase or sale, such
acquisition or disposition or any related repayment of Debt had occurred as of
the first day of such period with the appropriate adjustments with respect to
such acquisition or disposition being included in such pro forma calculation
(Section 1011).
For purposes of the foregoing provisions regarding the limitation on the
incurrence of Debt, Debt shall be deemed to be "incurred" by the Operating
Partnership and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis whenever the Operating
Partnership and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis shall create, assume,
guarantee or otherwise become liable in respect thereof.
MAINTENANCE OF TOTAL UNENCUMBERED ASSETS. The Operating Partnership is
required to maintain Total Unencumbered Assets of not less than 200% of the
aggregate outstanding principal amount of all outstanding Unsecured Debt
(Section 1013).
LIMITATIONS ON DISTRIBUTIONS. The Operating Partnership will not make any
distribution, by reduction of capital or otherwise (other than distributions
payable in securities evidencing interests in the Operating Partnership's
capital for the purpose of acquiring interests in real property or otherwise)
unless, immediately after giving pro forma effect to such distribution (a) no
default under the Indenture or event of default under any mortgage, indenture or
instrument under which there may be issued, or by which there may be secured or
evidenced, any Debt of the Operating Partnership, the Company or any Subsidiary
shall have occurred or be continuing, and (b) the aggregate sum of all
distributions made after the date of the Indenture shall not exceed the sum of
(i) 95% of the aggregate cumulative Funds From Operations of the Operating
Partnership accrued on a cumulative basis from the date of the Indenture until
the end of the last fiscal quarter prior to the contemplated payment, and (ii)
the aggregate Net Cash Proceeds received by the Operating Partnership after the
date of the Indenture from the issuance and sale of Capital Stock of the
Operating Partnership or the Company; provided, however, that the foregoing
limitation shall not apply to any distribution or other action which is
necessary to maintain the Company's status as a REIT, under the Code, if the
aggregate principal amount of all outstanding Debt of the Company and the
Operating Partnership on a consolidated basis at such time is less than 60% of
Adjusted Total Assets (Section 1012).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Operating Partnership will not be
prohibited from making the payment of any distribution within 30 days of the
declaration thereof if at such date of declaration such payment would have
complied with the provisions of the immediately preceding paragraph.
EXISTENCE. Except as permitted under "Merger, Consolidation or Sale," the
Operating Partnership and the Company are required to do or cause to be done all
things necessary to preserve and keep in full force and effect their existence,
rights and franchises; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Operating Partnership or the
Company shall not be required to preserve any right or franchise if it
determines that the preservation thereof is no longer desirable in the conduct
of its business and that the loss thereof is not disadvantageous in any material
respect to the Holders of the Debt Securities (Section 1007).
14
<PAGE>
MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTIES. The Operating Partnership is required to cause
all of its material properties used or useful in the conduct of its business or
the business of any Subsidiary to be maintained and kept in good condition,
repair and working order and supplied with all necessary equipment and to cause
to be made all necessary repairs, renewals, replacements, betterments and
improvements thereof, all as in the judgment of the Operating Partnership may be
necessary so that the business carried on in connection therewith may be
properly and advantageously conducted at all times; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the
Operating Partnership and its Subsidiaries shall not be prevented from selling
or otherwise disposing for value their respective properties in the ordinary
course of business (Section 1005).
INSURANCE. The Operating Partnership is required to, and is required to
cause each of its Subsidiaries to, keep all of its insurable properties insured
against loss or damage at least equal to their then full insurable value with
financially sound and reputable insurance companies (Section 1006).
PAYMENT OF TAXES AND OTHER CLAIMS. The Operating Partnership and the
Company are required to pay or discharge or cause to be paid or discharged,
before the same shall become delinquent, (i) all taxes, assessments and
governmental charges levied or imposed upon it or any Subsidiary or upon its
income, profits or property or that of any Subsidiary, and (ii) all lawful
claims for labor, materials and supplies which, if unpaid, might by law become a
lien upon the property of the Operating Partnership, the Company, or any
Subsidiary; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Operating Partnership and the Company
shall not be required to pay or discharge or cause to be paid or discharged any
such tax, assessment, charge or claim whose amount, applicability or validity is
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings (Section 1014).
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION. The Holders of Debt Securities will be
provided with copies of the annual reports and quarterly reports of the
Operating Partnership. Whether or not the Operating Partnership is subject to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and for so long as any Debt Securities
are outstanding, the Operating Partnership will, to the extent permitted under
the Exchange Act, be required to file with the Commission the annual reports,
quarterly reports and other documents that the Operating Partnership would have
been required to file with the Commission pursuant to such Section 13 or 15(d)
(the "Financial Statements") if the Operating Partnership were so subject, such
documents to be filed with the Commission on or prior to the respective dates
(the "Required Filing Dates") by which the Operating Partnership would have been
required so to file such documents if the Operating Partnership were so subject.
The Operating Partnership will also in any event (x) within 15 days of each
Required Filing Date (i) transmit by mail to all Holders of Debt Securities, as
their names and addresses appear in the Security Register, without cost to such
Holders, copies of the annual reports and quarterly reports which the Operating
Partnership would have been required to file with the Commission pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act if the Operating Partnership were
subject to such Sections and (ii) file with the Trustee copies of the annual
reports, quarterly reports and other documents that the Operating Partnership
would have been required to file with the Commission pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act if the Operating Partnership were subject to such
Sections and (y) if filing such documents by the Operating Partnership with the
Commission is not permitted under the Exchange Act, promptly upon written
request and payment of the reasonable cost of duplication and delivery, supply
copies of such documents to any prospective Holder (Section 1015).
As used herein and in the Prospectus Supplement:
"ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGE" as of any date means the amount which is expensed
and capitalized in any 12-month period for interest on Debt.
"CAPITAL STOCK" of any Person means any and all shares, interests, rights
to purchase, warrants, options, participations, rights in or other equivalents
(however designated) of such Person's capital stock or other equity
participations, including partnership interests, whether general or limited, in
such Person, including any preferred stock, and any rights (other than debt
securities convertible into capital stock), warrants or options exchangeable for
or convertible into such capital stock, whether now outstanding or issued after
the date of this Prospectus.
"CONSOLIDATED INCOME AVAILABLE FOR DEBT SERVICE" for any period means
Consolidated Net Income (as defined below) of the Operating Partnership and its
Subsidiaries (i) plus amounts which have been deducted for (a) interest on Debt
of the Operating Partnership and its Subsidiaries, (b) provision for taxes of
the
15
<PAGE>
Operating Partnership and its Subsidiaries based on income, (c) amortization of
debt discount, (d) depreciation and amortization, (e) the effect of any noncash
charge resulting from a change in accounting principles in determining
Consolidated Net Income for such period, (f) amortization of deferred charges
and (g) provisions for or realized losses on properties and (ii) less amounts
that have been included for gains on properties.
"CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME" for any period means the amount of consolidated
net income (or loss) of the Operating Partnership and its Subsidiaries for such
period determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP").
"DEBT" means any indebtedness, whether or not contingent, in respect of (i)
borrowed money evidenced by bonds, notes, debentures or similar instruments,
(ii) indebtedness secured by any mortgage, pledge, lien, charge, encumbrance or
any security interest existing on property, (iii) the reimbursement obligations,
contingent or otherwise, in connection with any letters of credit actually
issued or amounts representing the balance deferred and unpaid of the purchase
price of any property except any such balance that constitutes an accrued
expense or trade payable or (iv) any lease of property which would be reflected
on a consolidated balance sheet as a capitalized lease in accordance with GAAP,
in the case of items of indebtedness under (i) through (iii) above to the extent
that any such items (other than letters of credit) would appear as a liability
on a consolidated balance sheet in accordance with GAAP, and also includes, to
the extent not otherwise included, any obligation to be liable for, or to pay,
as obligor, guarantor or otherwise (other than for purposes of collection in the
ordinary course of business), indebtedness of another person.
"FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS" ("FFO") for any period means the Consolidated Net
Income of the Operating Partnership and its Subsidiaries for such period without
giving effect to depreciation and amortization, gains or losses from
extraordinary items, gains or losses on sales of real estate, gains or losses on
investments in marketable securities and any provision/benefit for income taxes
for such period, plus the allocable portion, based on the Operating
Partnership's ownership interest, of funds from operations of unconsolidated
joint ventures, all determined on a consistent basis.
Management considers Funds from Operations to be a useful financial
performance measure of the operating performance of an equity REIT because,
together with net income and cash flows, Funds from Operations provides
investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a REIT to incur
and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures. Funds
from Operations does not represent net income or cash flows from operations as
defined by GAAP and Funds from Operations should not be considered as an
alternative to net income as an indicator of the Operating Partnership's
operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of
liquidity. Funds from Operations does not measure whether cash flow is
sufficient to fund all of the Company's cash needs including principal
amortization, capital improvements and distributions to stockholders. Funds from
Operations does not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing
activities as defined by GAAP. Further, Funds from Operations as disclosed by
other REITS, may not be comparable to the Company's calculation of Funds from
Operations, as described above.
"NET CASH PROCEEDS" means the proceeds of any issuance or sale of Capital
Stock or options, warrants or rights to purchase Capital Stock, in the form of
cash or cash equivalents, including payments in respect of deferred payment
obligations when received in the form of, or stock or other assets when disposed
for, cash or cash equivalents (except to the extent that such obligations are
financed or sold with recourse to the Operating Partnership or any Subsidiary),
net of attorney's fees, accountant's fees and brokerage, consultation,
underwriting and other fees and expenses actually incurred in connection with
such issuance or sale and net of taxes paid or payable as a result thereof.
"SUBSIDIARY" means any entity of which the Operating Partnership or one or
more other Subsidiaries owns or controls, directly or indirectly, more than 50%
of the shares of Voting Stock.
"TOTAL ASSETS" as of any date means the sum of (i) the Undepreciated Real
Estate Assets and (ii) all other assets of the Operating Partnership and its
Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis determined in accordance with GAAP (but
excluding intangibles and accounts receivable).
16
<PAGE>
"TOTAL UNENCUMBERED ASSETS" means the sum of (i) those Undepreciated Real
Estate Assets not subject to an encumbrance and (ii) all other assets of the
Operating Partnership and its Subsidiaries not subject to an encumbrance
determined in accordance with GAAP (but excluding intangibles and accounts
receivable).
"UNDEPRECIATED REAL ESTATE ASSETS" as of any date means the cost (original
cost plus capital improvements) of real estate assets of the Operating
Partnership and its Subsidiaries on such date, before depreciation and
amortization, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
"UNSECURED DEBT" means Debt of the Operating Partnership or any Subsidiary
which is not secured by any mortgage, lien, charge, pledge or security interest
of any kind upon any of the properties owned by the Operating Partnership or any
of its Subsidiaries.
"VOTING STOCK" means stock having general voting power under ordinary
circumstances to elect at least a majority of the board of directors, managers
or trustees, provided that stock that carries only the right to vote
conditionally on the happening of an event shall not be considered Voting Stock.
ADDITIONAL COVENANTS. Any additional or different covenants of the
Operating Partnership or the Company with respect to any series of Debt
Securities will be set forth in the Prospectus Supplement relating thereto.
EVENTS OF DEFAULT, NOTICE AND WAIVER
The Indenture provides that the following events are "Events of Default"
with respect to any series of Debt Securities issued thereunder: (a) default for
30 days in the payment of any installment of interest on any Debt Security of
such series; (b) default in the payment of the principal of (or premium, if any
on) any Debt Security of such series at its maturity; (c) default in making any
sinking fund payment as required for any Debt Security of such series; (d)
default in the performance of any other covenant of the Operating Partnership or
the Company contained in the Indenture (other than a covenant added to the
Indenture solely for the benefit of a series of Debt Securities issued
thereunder other than such series), such default having continued for 60 days
after written notice as provided in the Indenture; (e) default in the payment of
an aggregate principal amount exceeding $5,000,000 of any evidence of recourse
indebtedness of the Operating Partnership or the Company or any mortgage,
indenture or other instrument under which such indebtedness is issued or by
which such indebtedness is secured, such default having occurred after the
expiration of any applicable grace period and having resulted in the
acceleration of the maturity of such indebtedness, but only if such indebtedness
is not discharged or such acceleration is not rescinded or annulled; (f) certain
events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization, or court appointment of a
receiver, liquidator or trustee of the Operating Partnership, the Company or any
Significant Subsidiary or any of their respective property; and (g) any other
Event of Default provided with respect to a particular series of Debt
Securities. The term "Significant Subsidiary" means each significant subsidiary
(as defined in Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act) of the
Operating Partnership or the Company (Section 501).
If an Event of Default under the Indenture with respect to Debt Securities
of any series at the time Outstanding occurs and is continuing, then in every
such case the Trustee or the Holders of not less than 25% in principal amount of
the Outstanding Debt Securities of that series may declare the principal amount
(or, if the Debt Securities of that series are Original Issue Discount
Securities or Indexed Securities, such portion of the principal amount as may be
specified in the terms thereof) of all of the Debt Securities of that series to
be due and payable immediately by written notice thereof to the Operating
Partnership and the Company (and to the Trustee if given by the Holders).
However, at any time after such a declaration of acceleration with respect to
Debt Securities of such series (or of all Debt Securities then Outstanding under
the Indenture, as the case may be) has been made, but before a judgment or
decree for payment of the money due has been obtained by the Trustee, the
Holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of Outstanding Debt
Securities of such series (or of all Debt Securities then Outstanding under the
Indenture, as the case may be) may rescind and annul such declaration and its
consequences if (a) the Operating Partnership or the Company shall have
deposited with the Trustee all required payments of the principal of (and
premium, if any) and interest on the Debt Securities of such series (or of all
Debt Securities then Outstanding under the Indenture, as the case may be), plus
certain fees, expenses, disbursements and advances of the Trustee and (b) all
Events of Default, other than the non-payment of accelerated principal of (or
specified portion thereof), or premium (if any) or interest on the Debt
Securities of such series (or of all
17
<PAGE>
Debt Securities then Outstanding under the Indenture, as the case may be) have
been cured or waived as provided in the Indenture (Section 502). The Indenture
also provides that the Holders of not less than a majority in principal amount
of the Outstanding Debt Securities of any series (or of all Debt Securities then
Outstanding under the Indenture, as the case may be) may waive any past default
with respect to such series and its consequences, except a default (x) in the
payment of the principal of (or premium, if any) or interest on any Debt
Security of such series or (y) in respect of a covenant or provision contained
in the Indenture that cannot be modified or amended without the consent of the
Holder of each Outstanding Debt Security affected thereby (Section 513).
The Trustee will be required to give notice to the Holders of Debt
Securities within 90 days of a default under the Indenture unless such default
has been cured or waived; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Trustee may withhold
notice to the Holders of any series of Debt Securities of any default with
respect to such series (except a default in the payment of the principal of (or
premium, if any) or interest on any Debt Security of such series or in the
payment of any sinking fund installment in respect of any Debt Security of such
series) if specified Responsible Officers of the Trustee consider such
withholding to be in the interest of such Holders (Section 602).
The Indenture provides that no Holders of Debt Securities of any series may
institute any proceedings, judicial or otherwise, with respect to the Indenture
or for any remedy thereunder, except in the case of failure of the Trustee, for
60 days, to act after it has received a written request to institute proceedings
in respect of an Event of Default from the Holders of not less than 25% in
principal amount of the Outstanding Debt Securities of such series, as well as
an offer of indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it (Section 507). This
provision will not prevent, however, any holder of Debt Securities from
instituting suit for the enforcement of payment of the principal of (and
premium, if any) and interest on such Debt Securities at the respective due
dates thereof (Section 508).
Subject to provisions in the Indenture relating to its duties in case of
default, the Trustee is under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or
powers under the Indenture at the request or direction of any Holders of any
series of Debt Securities then Outstanding under the Indenture, unless such
Holders shall have offered to the Trustee thereunder reasonable security or
indemnity (Section 601). The Holders of not less than a majority in principal
amount of the Outstanding Debt Securities of any series (or of all Debt
Securities then Outstanding under the Indenture, as the case may be) shall have
the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for
any remedy available to the Trustee, or of exercising any trust or power
conferred upon the Trustee. However, the Trustee may refuse to follow any
direction which is in conflict with any law or the Indenture, or which may be
unduly prejudicial to the holders of Debt Securities of such series not joining
therein (Section 512).
Within 120 days after the close of each fiscal year, the Operating
Partnership and the Company (if the Debt Securities are Guaranteed Securities)
must deliver to the Trustee a certificate, signed by one of several specified
officers of the Company, stating whether or not such officer has knowledge of
any default under the Indenture and, if so, specifying each such default and the
nature and status thereof (Sections 1009 and 1010).
MODIFICATION OF THE INDENTURE
Modifications and amendments of the Indenture will be permitted to be made
only with the consent of the Holders of not less than a majority in principal
amount of all Outstanding Debt Securities or series of Outstanding Debt
Securities which are affected by such modification or amendment; PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that no such modification or amendment may, without the consent of the
Holder of each such Debt Security affected thereby, (a) change the Stated
Maturity of the principal of, or premium (if any) or any installment of interest
on, any such Debt Security, reduce the principal amount of, or the rate or
amount of interest on, or any premium payable on redemption of, any such Debt
Security, or reduce the amount of principal of an Original Issue Discount
Security that would be due and payable upon declaration of acceleration of the
maturity thereof or would be provable in bankruptcy, or adversely affect any
right or repayment of the holder of any such Debt Security, change the place of
payment, or the coin or currency, for payment of principal of, premium, if any,
or interest on any such Debt Security or impair the right to institute suit for
the enforcement of any payment on or with respect to any such Debt Security; (b)
reduce the above-stated
18
<PAGE>
percentage of outstanding Debt Securities of any series necessary to modify or
amend the Indenture, to waive compliance with certain provisions thereof or
certain defaults and consequences thereunder or to reduce the quorum or voting
requirements set forth in the Indenture; (c) modify or affect in any manner
adverse to the Holders the terms and conditions of the obligations of the
Company in respect of the payment of principal (and premium, if any) and
interest on any Guaranteed Securities; or (d) modify any of the foregoing
provisions or any of the provisions relating to the waiver of certain past
defaults or certain covenants, except to increase the required percentage to
effect such action or to provide that certain other provisions may not be
modified or waived without the consent of the Holder of such Debt Security
(Section 902).
The Indenture provides that the Holders of not less than a majority in
principal amount of a series of Outstanding Debt Securities have the right to
waive compliance by the Operating Partnership and/or the Company with certain
covenants relating to such series of Debt Securities in the Indenture (Section
1008).
Modifications and amendments of the Indenture will be permitted to be made
by the Operating Partnership, the Company and the Trustee without the consent of
any Holder of Debt Securities for any of the following purposes: (i) to evidence
the succession of another Person to the Operating Partnership as obligor or the
Company as guarantor under the Indenture; (ii) to add to the covenants of the
Operating Partnership or the Company for the benefit of the Holders of all or
any series of Debt Securities or to surrender any right or power conferred upon
the Operating Partnership or the Company in the Indenture; (iii) to add Events
of Default for the benefit of the Holders of all or any series of Debt
Securities; (iv) to add or change any provisions of the Indenture to facilitate
the issuance of, or to liberalize certain terms of, Debt Securities in bearer
form, or to permit or facilitate the issuance of Debt Securities in
uncertificated form, provided that such action shall not adversely affect the
interests of the Holders of the Debt Securities of any series in any material
respect; (v) to amend or supplement any provisions of the Indenture, provided
that no such amendment or supplement shall materially adversely affect the
interests of the Holders of any Debt Securities then Outstanding; (vi) to secure
the Debt Securities; (vii) to establish the form or terms of Debt Securities of
any series; (viii) to provide for the acceptance of appointment by a successor
Trustee to facilitate the administration of the trusts under the Indenture by
more than one Trustee; (ix) to cure any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency in
the Indenture, provided that such action shall not adversely affect the
interests of Holders of Debt Securities of any series in any material respect;
or (x) to supplement any of the provisions of the Indenture to the extent
necessary to permit or facilitate defeasance and discharge of any series of such
Debt Securities, provided that such action shall not adversely affect the
interests of the Holders of the Debt Securities of any series in any material
respect (Section 901). In addition, with respect to Guaranteed Securities,
without the consent of any Holder of Debt Securities the Company, or a
subsidiary thereof, may directly assume the due and punctual payment of the
principal of, any premium and interest on all the Guaranteed Securities and the
performance of every covenant of the Indenture on the part of the Operating
Partnership to be performed or observed. Upon any such assumption, the Company
or such subsidiary shall succeed to, and be substituted for and may exercise
every right and power of, the Operating Partnership under the Indenture with the
same effect as if the Company or such subsidiary had been the issuer of the
Guaranteed Securities and the Operating Partnership shall be released from all
obligations and covenants with respect to the Guaranteed Securities. No such
assumption shall be permitted unless the Company has delivered to the Trustee
(i) an officer's certificate and an opinion of counsel, stating, among other
things, that the Guarantee and all other covenants of the Company in the
Indenture remain in full force and effect and (ii) an opinion of independent
counsel that the Holders of Guaranteed Securities shall have no United States
Federal tax consequences as a result of such assumption, and that, if any Debt
Securities are then listed on the New York Stock Exchange, that such Debt
Securities shall not be delisted as a result of such assumption (Section 805).
The Indenture provides that in determining whether the Holders of the
requisite principal amount of Outstanding Debt Securities of a series have given
any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent or waiver
thereunder or whether a quorum is present at a meeting of Holders of Debt
Securities, (i) the principal amount of an Original Issue Discount Security that
shall be deemed to be Outstanding shall be the amount of the principal thereof
that would be due and payable as of the date of such determination upon
declaration of acceleration of the maturity thereof, (ii) the principal amount
of a Debt Security denominated in a foreign currency that shall be deemed
Outstanding shall be the U.S. dollar equivalent, determined on the issue date
for such Debt Security, of the principal amount (or, in the case of an Original
Issue
19
<PAGE>
Discount Security, the U.S. dollar equivalent on the issue date of such Debt
Security of the amount determined as provided in (i) above), (iii) the principal
amount of an Indexed Security that shall be deemed Outstanding shall be the
principal face amount of such Indexed Security at original issuance, unless
otherwise provided with respect to such Indexed Security pursuant to the
Indenture, and (iv) Debt Securities owned by the Operating Partnership, the
Company or any other obligor upon the Debt Securities or any affiliate of the
Operating Partnership, the Company or of such other obligor shall be
disregarded.
The Indenture contains provisions for convening meetings of the Holders of
Debt Securities of a series (Section 1501). A meeting will be permitted to be
called at any time by the Trustee, and also, upon request, by the Operating
Partnership, the Company (in respect of a series of Guaranteed Securities) or
the holders of at least 10% in principal amount of the Outstanding Debt
Securities of such series, in any such case upon notice given as provided in the
Indenture (Section 1502). Except for any consent that must be given by the
Holder of each Debt Security affected by certain modifications and amendments of
the Indenture, any resolution presented at a meeting or adjourned meeting duly
reconvened at which a quorum is present will be permitted to be adopted by the
affirmative vote of the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the
Outstanding Debt Securities of that series; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that, except as
referred to above, any resolution with respect to any request, demand,
authorization, direction, notice, consent, waiver or other action that may be
made, given or taken by the Holders of a specified percentage, which is less
than a majority, in principal amount of the Outstanding Debt Securities of a
series may be adopted at a meeting or adjourned meeting duly reconvened at which
a quorum is present by the affirmative vote of the Holders of such specified
percentage in principal amount of the Outstanding Debt Securities of that
series. Any resolution passed or decision taken at any meeting of Holders of
Debt Securities of any series duly held in accordance with the Indenture will be
binding on all Holders of Debt Securities of that series. The quorum at any
meeting called to adopt a resolution, and at any reconvened meeting, will be
Persons holding or representing a majority in principal amount of the
Outstanding Debt Securities of a series; provided, however, that if any action
is to be taken at such meeting with respect to a consent or waiver which may be
given by the Holders of not less than a specified percentage in principal amount
of the Outstanding Debt Securities of a series, the Persons holding or
representing such specified percentage in principal amount of the Outstanding
Debt Securities of such series will constitute a quorum (Section 1504).
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, any action to be taken at a
meeting of Holders of Debt Securities of any series with respect to any action
that the Indenture expressly provides may be taken by the Holders of a specified
percentage which is less than a majority in principal amount of the Outstanding
Debt Securities of a series may be taken at a meeting at which a quorum is
present by the affirmative vote of Holders of such specified percentage in
principal amount of the Outstanding Debt Securities of such series (Section
1504).
DISCHARGE, DEFEASANCE AND COVENANT DEFEASANCE
The Operating Partnership may discharge certain obligations to Holders of
any series of Debt Securities that have not already been delivered to the
Trustee for cancellation and that either have become due and payable or will
become due and payable within one year (or scheduled for redemption within one
year) by irrevocably depositing with the Trustee, in trust, funds in such
currency or currencies, currency unit or units or composite currency or
currencies in which such Debt Securities are payable in an amount sufficient to
pay the entire indebtedness on such Debt Securities in respect of principal (and
premium, if any) and interest to the date of such deposit (if such Debt
Securities have become due and payable) or to the Stated Maturity or Redemption
Date, as the case may be (Section 401).
Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the
Operating Partnership may elect either (a) to defease and discharge itself and
the Company (if such Debt Securities are Guaranteed Securities) from any and all
obligations with respect to such Debt Securities (except for the obligation to
pay additional amounts, if any, upon the occurrence of certain events of tax,
assessment or governmental charge with respect to payments on such Debt
Securities and the obligations to register the transfer or exchange of such Debt
Securities, to replace temporary or mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Debt
Securities, to maintain an office or agency in respect of such Debt Securities
and to hold moneys for payment in trust) ("defeasance") or (b) to release itself
and the Company (if such Debt Securities are Guaranteed Securities) from their
obligations with respect to such Debt Securities under certain sections of the
Indenture
20
<PAGE>
(including the restrictions described under "Certain Covenants") and if provided
pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, their obligations with respect to any
other covenant, and any omission to comply with such obligations shall not
constitute a default or an Event of Default with respect to such Debt Securities
("covenant defeasance"), in either case upon the irrevocable deposit by the
Operating Partnership or the Company (if the Debt Securities are Guaranteed
Securities) with the Trustee, in trust, of an amount, in such currency or
currencies, currency unit or units or composite currency or currencies in which
such Debt Securities are payable at Stated Maturity, or Government Obligations
(as defined below), or both, applicable to such Debt Securities which through
the scheduled payment of principal and interest in accordance with their terms
will provide money in an amount sufficient to pay the principal of (and premium,
if any) and interest on such Debt Securities, and any mandatory sinking fund or
analogous payments thereon, on the scheduled due dates therefor (Section 402).
Such a trust will only be permitted to be established if, among other
things, the Operating Partnership or the Company (if the Debt Securities are
Guaranteed Securities) has delivered to the Trustee an Opinion of Counsel (as
specified in the Indenture) to the effect that the Holders of such Debt
Securities will not recognize income, gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes as a result of such defeasance or covenant defeasance and will be
subject to U.S. Federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and
at the same times as would have been the case if such defeasance or covenant
defeasance had not occurred, and such Opinion of Counsel, in the case of
defeasance, must refer to and be based upon a ruling of the Internal Revenue
Service or a change in applicable United States Federal income tax law occurring
after the date of the Indenture (Section 402).
"Government Obligations" means securities that are (i) direct obligations
of the United States of America or the government that issued the foreign
currency in which the Debt Securities of a particular series are payable, for
the payment of which its full faith and credit is pledged or (ii) obligations of
a person controlled or supervised by and acting as an agency or instrumentality
of the United States of America or such government that issued the foreign
currency in which the Debt Securities of such series are payable, the payment of
which is unconditionally guaranteed as a full faith and credit obligation by the
United States of America or such other government, and that, in either case, are
not callable or redeemable at the option of the issuer thereof, and shall also
include a depository receipt issued by a bank or trust company as custodian with
respect to any such Government Obligation or a specific payment of interest on
or principal of any such Government Obligation held by such custodian for the
account of the holder of a depository receipt, PROVIDED that (except as required
by law) such custodian is not authorized to make any deduction from the amount
payable to the holder of such depository receipt from any amount received by the
custodian in respect of the Government Obligation or the specific payment of
interest on or principal of the Government Obligation evidenced by such
depository receipt.
Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, if after
the Operating Partnership or the Company (if the Debt Securities are Guaranteed
Securities) has deposited funds and/or Government Obligations to effect
defeasance or covenant defeasance with respect to Debt Securities of any series,
(a) the Holder of a Debt Security of such series is entitled to, and does, elect
pursuant to the Indenture or the terms of such Debt Security to receive payment
in a currency, currency unit or composite currency other than that in which such
deposit has been made in respect of such Debt Security, or (b) a Conversion
Event (as defined below) occurs in respect of the currency, currency unit or
composite currency in which such deposit has been made, the indebtedness
represented by such Debt Security shall be deemed to have been, and will be,
fully discharged and satisfied through the payment of the principal of (and
premium, if any) and interest on such Debt Security as they become due out of
the proceeds yielded by converting the amount so deposited in respect of such
Debt Security into the currency, currency unit or composite currency in which
such Debt Security becomes payable as a result of such election or such
Conversion Event based on the applicable market exchange rate (Section 402).
"Conversion Event" means the cessation of use of (i) a currency, currency unit
or composite currency both by the government of the country that issued such
currency and for the settlement of transactions by a central bank or other
public institutions of or within the international banking community, (ii) the
ECU both within the European Monetary System and for the settlement of
transactions by public institutions of or within the European Union or (iii) any
currency unit or composite currency other than the ECU for the purposes for
which it was established. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement, all payments of principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on
any
21
<PAGE>
Debt Security that is payable in a foreign currency that ceases to be used by
its government of issuance shall be made in U.S. dollars.
If the Operating Partnership effects covenant defeasance with respect to
any Debt Securities and such Debt Securities are declared due and payable
because of the occurrence of any Event of Default other than the Event of
Default described in clause (d) under "Events of Default, Notice and Waiver"
with respect to Sections no longer applicable to such Debt Securities or
described in clause (g) under "Events of Default, Notice and Waiver" with
respect to any other covenant as to which there has been covenant defeasance,
the amount in such currency, currency unit or composite currency in which such
Debt Securities are payable, and Government Obligations on deposit with the
Trustee, will be sufficient to pay amounts due on such Debt Securities at the
time of their Stated Maturity but may not be sufficient to pay amounts due on
such Debt Securities at the time of the acceleration resulting from such Event
of Default. However, the Operating Partnership and the Company (if such Debt
Securities are Guaranteed Securities) would remain liable to make payment of
such amounts due at the time of acceleration.
The applicable Prospectus Supplement may further describe the provisions,
if any, permitting such defeasance or covenant defeasance, including any
modifications to the provisions described above, with respect to the Debt
Securities of or within a particular series.
NO CONVERSION RIGHTS
The Debt Securities will not be convertible into or exchangeable for any
capital stock of the Company or equity interest in the Operating Partnership.
GLOBAL SECURITIES
The Debt Securities of a series may be issued in whole or in part in the
form of one or more global securities (the "Global Securities") that will be
deposited with, or on behalf of, a depositary (the "Depositary") identified in
the applicable Prospectus Supplement relating to such series. Global Securities
may be issued in either registered or bearer form and in either temporary or
permanent form. The specific terms of the depositary arrangement with respect to
a series of Debt Securities will be described in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement relating to such series.
22
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED STOCK
GENERAL
The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
$.01 par value per share, of which no Preferred Stock was outstanding at the
date hereof.
The following description of the Preferred Stock sets forth certain general
terms and provisions of the Preferred Stock to which any Prospectus Supplement
may relate. The statements below describing the Preferred Stock are in all
respects subject to and qualified in their entirety by reference to the
applicable provisions of the Company's Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation (the "Articles of Incorporation") and Bylaws and any applicable
amendment to the Articles of Incorporation designating terms of a series of
Preferred Stock (a "Designating Amendment").
TERMS
Subject to the limitations prescribed by the Articles of Incorporation, the
board of directors is authorized to fix the number of shares constituting each
series of Preferred Stock and the designations and powers, preferences and
relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof, including such provisions as may be desired
concerning voting, redemption, dividends, dissolution or the distribution of
assets, conversion or exchange, and such other subjects or matters as may be
fixed by resolution of the board of directors. The Preferred Stock will, when
issued, be fully paid and nonassessable by the Company and will have no
preemptive rights.
Reference is made to the Prospectus Supplement relating to the Preferred
Stock offered thereby for specific terms, including:
(1) The title and stated value of such Preferred Stock;
(2) The number of shares of such Preferred Stock offered, the liquidation
preference per share and the offering price of such Preferred Stock;
(3) The dividend rate(s), period(s) and/or payment date(s) or method(s) of
calculation thereof applicable to such Preferred Stock;
(4) The date from which dividends on such Preferred Stock shall
accumulate, if applicable;
(5) The procedures for any auction and remarketing, if any, for such
Preferred Stock;
(6) The provision for a sinking fund, if any, for such Preferred Stock;
(7) The provision for redemption, if applicable, of such Preferred Stock;
(8) Any listing of such Preferred Stock on any securities exchange;
(9) The terms and conditions, if applicable, upon which such Preferred
Stock will be convertible into Common Stock of the Company, including
the conversion price (or manner of calculation thereof);
(10) Whether interests in such Preferred Stock will be represented by
Depositary Shares;
(11) Any other specific terms, preferences, rights, limitations or
restrictions of such Preferred Stock;
(12) A discussion of Federal income tax considerations applicable to such
Preferred Stock;
(13) The relative ranking and preferences of such Preferred Stock as to
dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of the affairs of the Company;
(14) Any limitations on issuance of any series of Preferred Stock ranking
senior to or on a parity with such series of Preferred Stock as to
dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of the affairs of the Company; and
(15) Any limitations on direct or beneficial ownership and restrictions on
transfer, in each case as may be appropriate to preserve the status of
the Company as a REIT.
23
<PAGE>
RANK
Unless otherwise specified in the Prospectus Supplement, the Preferred
Stock will, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Company, rank (i) senior to all classes or
series of Common Stock of the Company, and to all equity securities ranking
junior to such Preferred Stock; (ii) on a parity with all equity securities
issued by the Company the terms of which specifically provide that such equity
securities rank on a parity with the Preferred Stock; and (iii) junior to all
equity securities issued by the Company the terms of which specifically provide
that such equity securities rank senior to the Preferred Stock. The term "equity
securities" does not include convertible debt securities.
DIVIDENDS
Holders of the Preferred Stock of each series will be entitled to receive,
when, as and if declared by the board of directors of the Company, out of assets
of the Company legally available for payment, cash dividends at such rates and
on such dates as will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. Each
such dividend shall be payable to holders of record as they appear on the share
transfer books of the Company on such record dates as shall be fixed by the
board of directors of the Company.
Dividends on any series of the Preferred Stock may be cumulative or
non-cumulative, as provided in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. Dividends,
if cumulative, will be cumulative from and after the date set forth in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement. If the board of directors of the Company fails
to declare a dividend payable on a dividend payment date on any series of the
Preferred Stock for which dividends are non-cumulative, then the holders of such
series of the Preferred Stock will have no right to receive a dividend in
respect of the dividend period ending on such dividend payment date, and the
Company will have no obligation to pay the dividend accrued for such period,
whether or not dividends on such series are declared payable on any future
dividend payment date.
If Preferred Stock of any series is outstanding, no dividends will be
declared or paid or set apart for payment on any capital stock of the Company of
any other series ranking, as to dividends, on a parity with or junior to the
Preferred Stock of such series for any period unless (i) if such series of
Preferred Stock has a cumulative dividend, full cumulative dividends have been
or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for
the payment thereof set apart for such payment on the Preferred Stock of such
series for all past dividend periods and the then current dividend period or
(ii) if such series of Preferred Stock does not have a cumulative dividend, full
dividends for the then current dividend period have been or contemporaneously
are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof
set apart for such payment on the Preferred Stock of such series. When dividends
are not paid in full (or a sum sufficient for such full payment is not so set
apart) upon Preferred Stock of any series and the shares of any other series of
Preferred Stock ranking on a parity as to dividends with the Preferred Stock of
such series, all dividends declared upon Preferred Stock of such series and any
other series of Preferred Stock ranking on a parity as to dividends with such
Preferred Stock shall be declared pro rata so that the amount of dividends
declared per share of Preferred Stock of such series and such other series of
Preferred Stock shall in all cases bear to each other the same ratio that
accrued dividends per share on the Preferred Stock of such series (which shall
not include any accumulation in respect of unpaid dividends for prior dividend
periods if such Preferred Stock does not have a cumulative dividend) and such
other series of Preferred Stock bear to each other. No interest, or sum of money
in lieu of interest, shall be payable in respect of any dividend payment or
payments on Preferred Stock of such series which may be in arrears.
Except as provided in the immediately preceding paragraph, unless (i) if
such series of Preferred Stock has a cumulative dividend, full cumulative
dividends on the Preferred Stock of such series have been or contemporaneously
are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof
set apart for payment for all past dividend periods and the then current
dividend period, and (ii) if such series of Preferred Stock does not have a
cumulative dividend, full dividends on the Preferred Stock of such series have
been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient
for the payment thereof set apart for payment for the then current dividend
period, no dividends (other than in shares of Common Stock or other capital
shares ranking junior to the Preferred Stock of such series as to dividends and
upon liquidation) shall be declared or paid or set aside for payment or other
distribution shall be declared or made upon the Common Stock, or any other
capital shares of the Company ranking junior to or
24
<PAGE>
on a parity with the Preferred Stock of such series as to dividends or upon
liquidation, nor shall any shares of Common Stock, or any other capital shares
of the Company ranking junior to or on a parity with the Preferred Stock of such
series as to dividends or upon liquidation be redeemed, purchased or otherwise
acquired for any consideration (or any moneys be paid to or made available for a
sinking fund for the redemption of any such shares) by the Company (except by
conversion into or exchange for other capital shares of the Company ranking
junior to the Preferred Stock of such series as to dividends and upon
liquidation).
REDEMPTION
If so provided in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the Preferred Stock
will be subject to mandatory redemption or redemption at the option of the
Company, as a whole or in part, in each case upon the terms, at the times and at
the redemption prices set forth in such Prospectus Supplement.
The Prospectus Supplement relating to a series of Preferred Stock that is
subject to mandatory redemption will specify the number of shares of such
Preferred Stock that shall be redeemed by the Company in each year commencing
after a date to be specified, at a redemption price per share to be specified,
together with an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon (which
shall not, if Preferred Stock does not have a cumulative dividend, include any
accumulation in respect of unpaid dividends for prior dividend periods) to the
date of redemption. The redemption price may be payable in cash or other
property, as specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. If the
redemption price for Preferred Stock of any series is payable only from the net
proceeds of the issuance of capital shares of the Company, the terms of such
Preferred Stock may provide that, if no such capital shares shall have been
issued or to the extent the net proceeds from any issuance are insufficient to
pay in full the aggregate redemption price then due, such Preferred Stock shall
automatically and mandatorily be converted into the applicable capital shares of
the Company pursuant to conversion provisions specified in the applicable
Prospectus Supplement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless (i) if such series of Preferred Stock
has a cumulative dividend, full cumulative dividends on all shares of any series
of Preferred Stock have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or
declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for payment for
all past dividend periods and the then current dividend period, and (ii) if such
series of Preferred Stock does not have a cumulative dividend, full dividends of
the Preferred Stock of any series have been or contemporaneously are declared
and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for
payment for the then current dividend period, no shares of any series of
Preferred Stock shall be redeemed unless all outstanding Preferred Stock of such
series is simultaneously redeemed; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the foregoing shall
not prevent the purchase or acquisition of Preferred Stock of such series to
preserve the REIT status of the Company or pursuant to a purchase or exchange
offer made on the same terms to holders of all outstanding Preferred Stock of
such series. In addition, unless (i) if such series of Preferred Stock has a
cumulative dividend, full cumulative dividends on all outstanding shares of any
series of Preferred Stock have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid
or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for payment
for all past dividends periods and the then current dividend period, and (ii) if
such series of Preferred Stock does not have a cumulative dividend, full
dividends on the Preferred Stock of any series have been or contemporaneously
are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof
set apart for payment for the then current dividend period, the Company shall
not purchase or otherwise acquire directly or indirectly any shares of Preferred
Stock of such series (except by conversion into or exchange for capital shares
of the Company ranking junior to the Preferred Stock of such series as to
dividends and upon liquidation); PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the foregoing shall not
prevent the purchase or acquisition of Preferred Stock of such series to
preserve the REIT status of the Company or pursuant to a purchase or exchange
offer made on the same terms to holders of all outstanding Preferred Stock of
such series.
If fewer than all of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock of any
series are to be redeemed, the number of shares to be redeemed will be
determined by the Company and such shares may be redeemed pro rata from the
holders of record of such shares in proportion to the number of such shares held
or for which redemption is requested by such holder (with adjustments to avoid
redemption of fractional shares) or by lot in a manner determined by the
Company.
25
<PAGE>
Notice of redemption will be mailed at least 30 days but not more than 60
days before the redemption date to each holder of record of Preferred Stock of
any series to be redeemed at the address shown on the share transfer books of
the Company. Each notice shall state: (i) the redemption date; (ii) the number
of shares and series of the Preferred Stock to be redeemed; (iii) the redemption
price; (iv) the place or places where certificates for such Preferred Stock are
to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price; (v) that dividends on the
shares to be redeemed will cease to accrue on such redemption date; and (vi) the
date upon which the holder's conversion rights, if any, as to such shares shall
terminate. If fewer than all the shares of Preferred Stock of any series are to
be redeemed, the notice mailed to each such holder thereof shall also specify
the number of shares of Preferred Stock to be redeemed from each such holder. If
notice of redemption of any Preferred Stock has been given and if the funds
necessary for such redemption have been set aside by the Company in trust for
the benefit of the holders of any Preferred Stock so called for redemption, then
from and after the redemption date dividends will cease to accrue on such
Preferred Stock, and all rights of the holders of such shares will terminate,
except the right to receive the redemption price.
LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE
Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
the affairs of the Company, then, before any distribution or payment shall be
made to the holders of any Common Stock or any other class or series of capital
shares of the Company ranking junior to the Preferred Stock in the distribution
of assets upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the
holders of each series of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive out of
assets of the Company legally available for distribution to shareholders
liquidating distributions in the amount of the liquidation preference per share
(set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement), plus an amount equal to all
dividends accrued and unpaid thereon (which shall not include any accumulation
in respect of unpaid dividends for prior dividend periods if such Preferred
Stock does not have a cumulative dividend). After payment of the full amount of
the liquidating distributions to which they are entitled, the holders of
Preferred Stock will have no right or claim to any of the remaining assets of
the Company. If, upon any such voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution
or winding up, the available assets of the Company are insufficient to pay the
amount of the liquidating distributions on all outstanding Preferred Stock and
the corresponding amounts payable on all shares of other classes or series of
capital shares of the Company ranking on a parity with the Preferred Stock in
the distribution of assets, then the holders of the Preferred Stock and all
other such classes or series of capital shares shall share ratably in any such
distribution of assets in proportion to the full liquidating distributions to
which they would otherwise be respectively entitled.
If liquidating distributions shall have been made in full to all holders of
Preferred Stock, the remaining assets of the Company shall be distributed among
the holders of any other classes or series of capital shares ranking junior to
the Preferred Stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, according to
their respective rights and preferences and in each case according to their
respective number of shares. For such purposes, the consolidation or merger of
the Company with or into any other corporation, trust or entity, or the sale,
lease or conveyance of all or substantially all of the property or business of
the Company, shall not be deemed to constitute a liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the Company.
VOTING RIGHTS
Holders of the Preferred Stock will not have any voting rights, except as
set forth below or as otherwise from time to time required by law or as
indicated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.
Whenever dividends on any shares of Preferred Stock shall be in arrears for
six or more consecutive quarterly periods, the holders of such shares of
Preferred Stock (voting separately as a class with all other series of preferred
stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable)
will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors of the
Company at a special meeting called by the holders of record of at least 10% of
any series of Preferred Stock so in arrears (unless such request is received
less than 90 days before the date fixed for the next annual or special meeting
of the stockholders) or at the next annual meeting of stockholders, and at each
subsequent annual meeting until (i) if such series of Preferred Stock has a
cumulative dividend, all dividends accumulated on such shares of Preferred Stock
for the past dividend periods and the then current dividend period shall have
been fully paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set
aside for payment or (ii) if such series of Preferred Stock does
26
<PAGE>
not have a cumulative dividend, four consecutive quarterly dividends shall have
been fully paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set
aside for payment. In such case, the entire board of directors of the Company
will be increased by two directors.
Unless provided otherwise for any series of Preferred Stock, so long as any
shares of Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the Company will not, without the
affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares
of each series of Preferred Stock outstanding at the time, given in person or by
proxy, either in writing or at a meeting (such series voting separately as a
class), (i) authorize or create, or increase the authorized or issued amount of,
any class or series of capital stock ranking prior to such series of Preferred
Stock with respect to payment of dividends or the distribution of assets upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up or reclassify any authorized capital
stock of the Company into such shares, or create, authorize or issue any
obligation or security convertible into or evidencing the right to purchase any
such shares; or (ii) amend, alter or repeal the provisions of the Company's
Articles of Incorporation or the Designating Amendment for such series of
Preferred Stock, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise (an "Event"), so
as to materially and adversely affect any right, preference, privilege or voting
power of such series of Preferred Stock or the holders thereof; PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, with respect to the occurrence of any of the Events set forth in (ii)
above, so long as the Preferred Stock remains outstanding with the terms thereof
materially unchanged, taking into account that upon the occurrence of an Event,
the Company may not be the surviving entity, the occurrence of any such Event
shall not be deemed to materially and adversely affect such rights, preferences,
privileges or voting power of holders of Preferred Stock and provided further
that (x) any increase in the amount of the authorized Preferred Stock or the
creation or issuance of any other series of Preferred Stock, or (y) any increase
in the amount of authorized shares of such series or any other series of
Preferred Stock, in each case ranking on a parity with or junior to the
Preferred Stock of such series with respect to payment of dividends or the
distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, shall not be
deemed to materially and adversely affect such rights, preferences, privileges
or voting powers.
The foregoing voting provisions will not apply if, at or prior to the time
when the act with respect to which such vote would otherwise be required shall
be effected, all outstanding shares of such series of Preferred Stock shall have
been redeemed or called for redemption and sufficient funds shall have been
deposited in trust to effect such redemption.
CONVERSION RIGHTS
The terms and conditions, if any, upon which any series of Preferred Stock
is convertible into shares of Common Stock will be set forth in the applicable
Prospectus Supplement relating thereto. Such terms will include the number of
shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Preferred Stock are convertible,
the conversion price (or manner of calculation thereof), the conversion period,
provisions as to whether conversion will be at the option of the holders of the
Preferred Stock or the Company, the events requiring an adjustment of the
conversion price and provisions affecting conversion in the event of the
redemption of such series of Preferred Stock.
SHAREHOLDER LIABILITY
As discussed below under "Description of Common Stock -- General,"
applicable Maryland law provides that no shareholder, including holders of
Preferred Stock, shall be personally liable for the acts and obligations of the
Company and that the funds and property of the Company shall be the only
recourse for such acts or obligations.
RESTRICTIONS ON OWNERSHIP
As discussed below under "Description of Common Stock -- Certain Provisions
Affecting Change of Control -- OWNERSHIP LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON
TRANSFERS," for the Company to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), not more than 50% in value of its outstanding
capital shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer
individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) during the last
half of a taxable year. To ensure that the Company remains a qualified REIT, the
Articles of Incorporation provide that no holder (other than persons approved by
the directors at their option and in their discretion) may own, or be deemed to
own by virtue of the
27
<PAGE>
attribution provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% of the issued and outstanding
capital stock of the Company. To assist the Company in meeting this requirement,
the Company may take certain actions to limit the beneficial ownership, directly
or indirectly, by a single person of the Company's outstanding equity
securities, including any Preferred Stock of the Company. Therefore, the
Designating Amendment for each series of Preferred Stock may contain provisions
restricting the ownership and transfer of the Preferred Stock. The applicable
Prospectus Supplement will specify any additional ownership limitation relating
to a series of Preferred Stock.
REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT
The Registrar and Transfer Agent for the Preferred Stock will be set forth
in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.
DESCRIPTION OF DEPOSITARY SHARES
GENERAL
The Company may issue receipts ("Depositary Receipts") for Depositary
Shares, each of which will represent a fractional interest of a share of a
particular series of Preferred Stock, as specified in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement. Shares of Preferred Stock of each series represented by Depositary
Shares will be deposited under a separate deposit agreement (each, a "Deposit
Agreement") among the Company, the depositary named therein (a "Preferred Stock
Depositary") and the holders from time to time of the Depositary Receipts.
Subject to the terms of the applicable Deposit Agreement, each owner of a
Depositary Receipt will be entitled, in proportion to the fractional interest of
a share of a particular series of Preferred Stock represented by the Depositary
Shares evidenced by such Depositary Receipt, to all the rights and preferences
of the Preferred Stock represented by such Depositary Shares (including
dividend, voting, conversion, redemption and liquidation rights).
The Depositary Shares will be evidenced by Depositary Receipts issued
pursuant to the applicable Deposit Agreement. Immediately following the issuance
and delivery of the Preferred Stock by the Company to a Preferred Stock
Depositary, the Company will cause such Preferred Stock Depositary to issue, on
behalf of the Company, the Depositary Receipts. Copies of the applicable form of
Deposit Agreement and Depositary Receipt may be obtained from the Company upon
request, and the statements made hereunder relating to Deposit Agreements and
the Depositary Receipts to be issued thereunder are summaries of certain
anticipated provisions thereof and do not purport to be complete and are subject
to, and qualified in their entirety by reference to, all of the provisions of
the applicable Deposit Agreement and related Depositary Receipts.
DIVIDENDS AND OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS
A Preferred Stock Depositary will be required to distribute all cash
dividends or other cash distributions received in respect of the applicable
Preferred Stock to the record holders of Depositary Receipts evidencing the
related Depositary Shares in proportion to the number of such Depositary
Receipts owned by such holders, subject to certain obligations of holders to
file proofs, certificates and other information and to pay certain charges and
expenses to such Preferred Stock Depositary.
In the event of a distribution other than in cash, a Preferred Stock
Depositary will be required to distribute property received by it to the record
holders of Depositary Receipts entitled thereto, subject to certain obligations
of holders to file proofs, certificates and other information and to pay certain
charges and expenses to such Preferred Stock Depositary, unless such Preferred
Stock Depositary determines that it is not feasible to make such distribution,
in which case such Preferred Stock Depositary may, with the approval of the
Company, sell such property and distribute the net proceeds from such sale to
such holders.
No distribution will be made in respect of any Depositary Share to the
extent that it represents any Preferred Stock that has been converted or
exchanged.
28
<PAGE>
WITHDRAWAL OF STOCK
Upon surrender of the Depositary Receipts at the corporate trust office of
the applicable Preferred Stock Depositary (unless the related Depositary Shares
have previously been called for redemption or converted), the holders thereof
will be entitled to delivery at such office, to or upon each such holder's
order, of the number of whole or fractional shares of the applicable Preferred
Stock and any money or other property represented by the Depositary Shares
evidenced by such Depositary Receipts. Holders of Depositary Receipts will be
entitled to receive whole or fractional shares of the related Preferred Stock on
the basis of the proportion of Preferred Stock represented by each Depositary
Share as specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, but holders of such
shares of Preferred Stock will not thereafter be entitled to receive Depositary
Shares therefor. If the Depositary Receipts delivered by the holder evidence a
number of Depositary Shares in excess of the number of Depositary Shares
representing the number of shares of Preferred Stock to be withdrawn, the
applicable Preferred Stock Depositary will be required to deliver to such holder
at the same time a new Depositary Receipt evidencing such excess number of
Depositary Shares.
REDEMPTION OF DEPOSITARY SHARES
Whenever the Company redeems shares of Preferred Stock held by a Preferred
Stock Depositary, such Preferred Stock Depositary will be required to redeem as
of the same redemption date the number of Depositary Shares representing shares
of the Preferred Stock so redeemed, provided the Company shall have paid in full
to such Preferred Stock Depositary the redemption price of the Preferred Stock
to be redeemed plus an amount equal to any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon
to the date fixed for redemption. The redemption price per Depositary Share will
be equal to the redemption price and any other amounts per share payable with
respect to the Preferred Stock. If fewer than all the Depositary Shares are to
be redeemed, the Depositary Shares to be redeemed will be selected pro rata (as
nearly as may be practicable without creating fractional Depositary Shares) or
by any other equitable method determined by the Company.
From and after the date fixed for redemption, all dividends in respect of
the shares of Preferred Stock so called for redemption will cease to accrue, the
Depositary Shares so called for redemption will no longer be deemed to be
outstanding and all rights of the holders of the Depositary Receipts evidencing
the Depositary Shares so called for redemption will cease, except the right to
receive any moneys payable upon such redemption and any money or other property
to which the holders of such Depositary Receipts were entitled upon such
redemption upon surrender thereof to the applicable Preferred Stock Depositary.
VOTING OF THE PREFERRED STOCK
Upon receipt of notice of any meeting at which the holders of the
applicable Preferred Stock are entitled to vote, a Preferred Stock Depositary
will be required to mail the information contained in such notice of meeting to
the record holders of the Depositary Receipts evidencing the Depositary Shares
that represent such Preferred Stock. Each record holder of Depositary Receipts
evidencing Depositary Shares on the record date (which will be the same date as
the record date for the Preferred Stock) will be entitled to instruct such
Preferred Stock Depositary as to the exercise of the voting rights pertaining to
the amount of Preferred Stock represented by such holder's Depositary Shares.
Such Preferred Stock Depositary will be required to vote the amount of Preferred
Stock represented by such Depositary Shares in accordance with such
instructions, and the Company will agree to take all reasonable action that may
be deemed necessary by such Preferred Stock Depositary in order to enable such
Preferred Stock Depositary to do so. Such Preferred Stock Depositary will be
required to abstain from voting the amount of Preferred Stock represented by
such Depositary Shares to the extent it does not receive specific instructions
from the holders of Depositary Receipts evidencing such Depositary Shares. A
Preferred Stock Depositary will not be responsible for any failure to carry out
any instruction to vote, or for the manner or effect of any such vote made, as
long as any such action or non-action is in good faith and does not result from
negligence or willful misconduct of such Preferred Stock Depositary.
LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE
In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company,
whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of each Depositary Receipt will be
entitled to the fraction of the liquidation preference
29
<PAGE>
accorded each share of Preferred Stock represented by the Depositary Share
evidenced by such Depositary Receipt, as set forth in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement.
CONVERSION OF PREFERRED STOCK
The Depositary Shares, as such, will not be convertible into Common Stock
or any other securities or property of the Company. Nevertheless, if so
specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement relating to an offering of
Depositary Shares, the Depositary Receipts may be surrendered by holders thereof
to the applicable Preferred Stock Depositary with written instructions to such
Preferred Stock Depositary to instruct the Company to cause conversion of the
Preferred Stock represented by the Depositary Shares evidenced by such
Depositary Receipts into whole shares of Common Stock, other shares of Preferred
Stock of the Company or other shares of stock, and the Company will agree that
upon receipt of such instructions and any amounts payable in respect thereof, it
will cause the conversion thereof utilizing the same procedures as those
provided for delivery of Preferred Stock to effect such conversion. If the
Depositary Shares evidenced by a Depositary Receipt are to be converted in part
only, a new Depositary Receipt or Receipts will be issued for any Depositary
Shares not to be converted. No fractional shares of Common Stock will be issued
upon conversion, and if such conversion will result in a fractional share being
issued, an amount will be paid in cash by the Company equal to the value of the
fractional interest based upon the closing price of the Common Stock on the last
business day prior to the conversion.
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF A DEPOSIT AGREEMENT
Any form of Depositary Receipt evidencing Depositary Shares that will
represent Preferred Stock and any provision of a Deposit Agreement will be
permitted at any time to be amended by agreement between the Company and the
applicable Preferred Stock Depositary. However, any amendment that materially
and adversely alters the rights of the holders of Depositary Receipts or that
would be materially and adversely inconsistent with the rights granted to the
holders of the related Preferred Stock will not be effective unless such
amendment has been approved by the existing holders of at least two-thirds of
the applicable Depositary Shares evidenced by the applicable Depositary Receipts
then outstanding. No amendment shall impair the right, subject to certain
anticipated exceptions in the Deposit Agreements, of any holder of Depositary
Receipts to surrender any Depositary Receipt with instructions to deliver to the
holder the related Preferred Stock and all money and other property, if any,
represented thereby, except in order to comply with law. Every holder of an
outstanding Depositary Receipt at the time any such amendment becomes effective
shall be deemed, by continuing to hold such Depositary Receipt, to consent and
agree to such amendment and to be bound by the applicable Deposit Agreement as
amended thereby.
A Deposit Agreement will be permitted to be terminated by the Company upon
not less that 30 days' prior written notice to the applicable Preferred Stock
Depositary if (i) such termination is necessary to preserve the Company's status
as a REIT or (ii) a majority of each series of Preferred Stock affected by such
termination consents to such termination, whereupon such Preferred Stock
Depositary will be required to deliver or make available to each holder of
Depositary Receipts, upon surrender of the Depositary Receipts held by such
holder, such number of whole or fractional shares of Preferred Stock as are
represented by the Depositary Shares evidenced by such Depositary Receipts
together with any other property held by such Preferred Stock Depositary with
respect to such Depositary Receipts. The Company will agree that if a Deposit
Agreement is terminated to preserve the Company's status as a REIT, then the
Company will use its best efforts to list the Preferred Stock issued upon
surrender of the related Depositary Shares on a national securities exchange. In
addition, a Deposit Agreement will automatically terminate if (i) all
outstanding Depositary Shares thereunder shall have been redeemed, (ii) there
shall have been a final distribution in respect of the related Preferred Stock
in connection with any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company and
such distribution shall have been distributed to the holders of Depositary
Receipts evidencing the Depositary Shares representing such Preferred Stock or
(iii) each share of the related Preferred Stock shall have been converted into
stock of the Company not so represented by Depositary Shares.
CHARGES OF A PREFERRED STOCK DEPOSITARY
The Company will pay all transfer and other taxes and governmental charges
arising solely from the existence of a Deposit Agreement. In addition, the
Company will pay the fees and expenses of a Preferred
30
<PAGE>
Stock Depositary in connection with the performance of its duties under a
Deposit Agreement. However, holders of Depositary Receipts will pay certain
other transfer and other taxes and governmental charges as well as the fees and
expenses of a Preferred Stock Depositary for any duties required by such holders
to be performed which are outside of those expressly provided for in the
applicable Deposit Agreement.
RESIGNATION AND REMOVAL OF DEPOSITARY
A Preferred Stock Depositary will be permitted to resign at any time by
delivering to the Company notice of its election to do so, and the Company will
be permitted at any time to remove a Preferred Stock Depositary, any such
resignation or removal to take effect upon the appointment of a successor
Preferred Stock Depositary. A successor Preferred Stock Depositary will be
required to be appointed within 60 days after delivery of the notice of
resignation or removal and will be required to be a bank or trust company having
its principal office in the United States and having a combined capital and
surplus of at least $50,000,000.
MISCELLANEOUS
A Preferred Stock Depositary will be required to forward to holders of
Depositary Receipts any reports and communications from the Company which are
received by such Preferred Stock Depositary with respect to the related
Preferred Stock.
Neither a Preferred Stock Depositary nor the Company will be liable if it
is prevented from or delayed in, by law or any circumstances beyond its control,
performing its obligations under a Depositary Agreement. The obligations of the
Company and a Preferred Stock Depositary under a Deposit Agreement will be
limited to performing their duties thereunder in good faith and without
negligence (in the case of any action or inaction in the voting of Preferred
Stock represented by the applicable Depositary Shares), gross negligence or
willful misconduct, and neither the Company nor any applicable Preferred Stock
Depositary will be obligated to prosecute or defend any legal proceeding in
respect of any Depositary Receipts, Depositary Shares or shares of Preferred
Stock represented thereby unless satisfactory indemnity is furnished. The
Company and any Preferred Stock Depositary will be permitted to rely on written
advice of counsel or accountants, or information provided by persons presenting
shares of Preferred Stock represented thereby for deposit, holders of Depositary
Receipts or other persons believed in good faith to be competent to give such
information, and on documents believed in good faith to be genuine and signed by
a proper party.
In the event a Preferred Stock Depositary shall receive conflicting claims,
requests or instructions from any holders of Depositary Receipts, on the one
hand, and the Company, on the other hand, such Preferred Stock Depositary shall
be entitled to act on such claims, requests or instructions received from the
Company.
DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK
GENERAL
The authorized capital stock of the Company includes 100,000,000 shares of
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share. Each outstanding share of Common Stock
entitles the holder to one vote on all matters presented to shareholders for a
vote. Holders of Common Stock have no preemptive rights. As of the date hereof,
there were 29,898,970 shares of Common Stock outstanding and 4,269,590 shares
reserved for issuance upon exchange of outstanding Units.
Shares of Common Stock currently outstanding are listed for trading on the
New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). The Company will apply to the NYSE to list
the additional shares of Common Stock to be sold pursuant to any Prospectus
Supplement, and the Company anticipates that such shares will be so listed.
All shares of Common Stock issued will be duly authorized, fully paid, and
non-assessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of Common Stock if and
when declared by the board of directors of the Company out of funds legally
available therefor. The Company intends to continue to pay quarterly dividends.
31
<PAGE>
Under Maryland law, shareholders are generally not liable for the Company's
debts or obligations. If the Company is liquidated, subject to the right of any
holders of preferred stock, if any, to receive preferential distributions, each
outstanding share of Common Stock will be entitled to participate pro rata in
the assets remaining after payment of, or adequate provision for, all known
debts and liabilities of the Company.
The Articles of Incorporation of the Company provide for the board of
directors to be divided into three classes of directors, each class to consist
as nearly as possible of one-third of the directors. At each annual meeting of
shareholders, the class of directors to be elected at such meeting will be
elected for a three-year term and the directors in the other two classes will
continue in office. The overall effect of the provisions in the Articles of
Incorporation with respect to the classified board may be to render more
difficult a change of control of the Company or removal of incumbent management.
Holders of Common Stock have no right to cumulative voting for the election of
directors. Consequently, at each annual meeting of shareholders, the holders of
a plurality of the shares of Common Stock are able to elect all of the
successors of the class of directors whose term expires at that meeting.
Directors may be removed only for cause and only with the affirmative vote of
the holders of two-thirds of the shares of capital stock entitled to vote in the
election of directors.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS AFFECTING CHANGE OF CONTROL
GENERAL. Pursuant to the Company's Articles of Incorporation and the
Maryland general corporation law (the "MGCL"), the Company cannot merge into or
consolidate with another corporation or enter into a statutory share exchange
transaction in which it is not the surviving entity or sell all or substantially
all of the assets of the Company unless the Board of Directors adopts a
resolution declaring the proposed transaction advisable and a majority of
stockholders entitled to vote thereon (voting together as a single class)
approve the transaction. In addition, the agreement of limited partnership of
the Operating Partnership (the "Operating Partnership Agreement") requires that
any such merger or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Operating Partnership be approved by a majority of the holders of Units
(including Units owned by the Company).
MARYLAND BUSINESS COMBINATION AND CONTROL SHARE STATUTES. The MGCL
establishes special requirements with respect to business combinations between
Maryland corporations and interested stockholders unless exemptions are
applicable. Among other things, the law prohibits for a period of five years a
merger and other specified or similar transactions between a company and an
interested stockholder and requires a supermajority vote for such transactions
after the end of the five-year period. The Company's Articles of Incorporation
contain a provision exempting the Company from the requirements and provisions
of the Maryland business combination statute. There can be no assurance that
such provision will not be amended or repealed at any point in the future.
The MGCL also provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation
acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the
extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter, excluding shares owned by the acquiror or by officers or directors who
are employees of the Company. The control share acquisition statute does not
apply to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the
Company is a party to the transaction, or to acquisitions approved or exempted
by the Articles of Incorporation or bylaws of the Company. The Company's bylaws
contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and
all acquisitions by any person of the Company's stock. There can be no assurance
that such provision will not be amended or repealed, in whole or in part, at any
point in the future.
The Company's Articles of Incorporation (including the provision exempting
the Company from the Maryland business combination statute) may not be amended
without the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares of capital
stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon voting together as a single
class, provided that certain provisions of the Articles of Incorporation may not
be amended without the approval of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of
capital stock of the Company outstanding and entitled to vote thereon voting
together as a single class. The Company's bylaws may be amended by the Board of
Directors or a majority of the shares cast of capital stock entitled to vote
thereupon at a duly constituted meeting of stockholders.
32
<PAGE>
If either of the foregoing exemptions in the Articles of Incorporation or
bylaws is amended, the Maryland business combination statute or the control
share acquisition statute could have the effect of discouraging offers to
acquire the Company and of increasing the difficulty of consummating any such
offer.
OWNERSHIP LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFERS. For the Company to
remain qualified as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% in value of its
outstanding shares of Common Stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five
or fewer individuals (defined in the Code to include certain entities) during
the last half of a taxable year, and such shares must be beneficially owned by
100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or
during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. To ensure that the
Company remains a qualified REIT, the Articles of Incorporation provide that no
holder (other than persons approved by the directors at their option and in
their discretion) may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution
provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% (the "Ownership Limit") of the issued and
outstanding capital stock of the Company. The Board of Directors may waive the
Ownership Limit if evidence satisfactory to the Board of Directors and the
Company's tax counsel is presented that the changes in ownership will not
jeopardize the Company's status as a REIT.
If any stockholder purports to transfer shares to a person and either the
transfer would result in the Company failing to qualify as a REIT, or the
stockholder knows that such transfer would cause the transferee to hold more
than the Ownership Limit, the purported transfer shall be null and void, and the
stockholder will be deemed not to have transferred the shares. In addition, if
any person holds shares of capital stock in excess of the Ownership Limit, such
person will be deemed to hold the excess shares in trust for the Company, will
not receive distributions with respect to such shares and will not be entitled
to vote such shares. The person will be required to sell such shares to the
Company for the lesser of the amount paid for the shares and the average closing
price for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the redemption or to sell
such shares at the direction of the Company, in which case the Company will be
reimbursed for its expenses in connection with the sale and will receive any
amount of such proceeds that exceeds the amount such person paid for the shares.
If the Company repurchases such shares, it may pay for the shares with Units.
The foregoing restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if
the Board of Directors and the stockholders (by the affirmative vote of the
holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to
vote on the matter) determine that it is no longer in the best interests of the
Company to continue to qualify as a REIT.
All certificates representing shares of Common Stock bear a legend
referring to the restrictions described above.
Every beneficial owner of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as
required by the Code or regulations thereunder) of the issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock must file a written notice with the Company no later
than January 30 of each year, containing the name and address of such beneficial
owner, the number of shares of Common Stock and/or Preferred Stock owned and a
description of how the shares are held. In addition, each stockholder shall be
required upon demand to disclose to the Company in writing such information as
the Company may request in order to determine the effect of such stockholder's
direct, indirect and constructive ownership of such shares on the Company's
status as a REIT.
These ownership limitations could have the effect of precluding acquisition
of control of the Company by a third party unless the Board of Directors and the
stockholders determine that maintenance of REIT status is no longer in the best
interest of the Company.
REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT
The Registrar and Transfer Agent for the Common Stock is First Union
National Bank, Charlotte, North Carolina.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following summary of certain Federal income tax considerations to the
Company is based on current law, is for general purposes only, and is not tax
advice. The summary addresses the material Federal income tax considerations
relating to the Company's REIT status, as well as material Federal income tax
considerations relating to the Operating Partnership. The tax treatment of a
holder of any of the Securities
33
<PAGE>
will vary depending upon the terms of the specific securities acquired by such
holder, as well as his particular situation, and this discussion does not
attempt to address any aspects of Federal income taxation relating to holders of
Securities. Certain Federal income tax considerations relevant to holders of the
Securities will be provided in the applicable Prospectus Supplement relating
thereto.
EACH INVESTOR IS ADVISED TO CONSULT HIS OWN TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO HIM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND SALE OF THE OFFERED
SECURITIES, INCLUDING THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND SALE AND OF POTENTIAL CHANGES IN
APPLICABLE TAX LAWS.
TAXATION OF THE COMPANY AS A REIT
GENERAL. Commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994, the
Company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under sections
856 through 860 of the Code. The Company believes that, commencing with its
taxable year ended December 31, 1994, it has been organized and is operating in
such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code, and the
Company intends to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be
given that it has operated or will operate in a manner so as to qualify or
remain qualified.
These sections of the Code are highly technical and complex. The following
sets forth the material aspects of the sections that govern the Federal income
tax treatment of a REIT and its shareholders. This summary is qualified in its
entirety by the applicable Code provisions, rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretation thereof.
Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. has acted as tax counsel to the Company
in connection with the offering of the Securities and the Company's election to
be taxed as a REIT and in the opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P.,
commencing with the Company's taxable year ended December 31, 1994, the Company
has been organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for
qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and the Company's current
organization and proposed method of operation will enable it to continue to meet
the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code. This
opinion is based on the factual representations of the Company concerning its
business and properties. Moreover, such qualification and taxation as a REIT
depends upon the Company's ability to meet the various qualification tests
imposed under the Code discussed below on a continuing basis, through actual
annual operating results, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of the Company's
operations for any particular taxable year will satisfy such requirements.
FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION OF THE COMPANY
If the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it generally will not be
subject to Federal corporate income tax on that portion of its ordinary income
or capital gain that is currently distributed to stockholders. The REIT
provisions of the Code generally allow a REIT to deduct distributions paid to
its stockholders substantially eliminating the Federal "double taxation" on
earnings (once at the corporate level when earned and once again at the
stockholder level when distributed) that usually results from investments in a
corporation. Nevertheless, the Company will be subject to Federal income tax as
follows: First, the Company will be taxed at regular corporate rates on its
undistributed REIT taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains.
Second, under certain circumstances, the Company may be subject to the
"alternative minimum tax" as a consequence of its items of tax preference.
Third, if the Company has net income from the sale or other disposition of
"foreclosure property" that is held primarily for sale to customers in the
ordinary course of business or other non-qualifying income from foreclosure
property, it will be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate on such
income. Fourth, if the Company has net income from prohibited transactions
(which are, in general, certain sales or other dispositions of property other
than foreclosure property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of business), such income will be subject to a 100% tax. Fifth, if the
Company should fail to satisfy either of the 75% or 95% gross income tests
(discussed below) but has nonetheless maintained its qualification as a REIT
because certain other requirements have been met, it will be subject to a 100%
tax on the net income attributable to the greater of the amount by
34
<PAGE>
which the Company fails either the 75% or 95% test, multiplied by a fraction
intended to reflect the Company's profitability. Sixth, if the Company fails to
distribute during each year at least the sum of (i) 85% of its ordinary income
for such year, (ii) 95% of its capital gain net income for such year and (iii)
any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, the Company will be subject
to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts
actually distributed. Seventh, if the Company should acquire any asset from a C
corporation (i.e., a corporation generally subject to full corporate-level tax)
in a carryover-basis transaction and the Company subsequently recognizes gain on
the disposition of such asset during the 10-year period (the "Recognition
Period") beginning on the date on which the asset was acquired by the Company,
then, to the extent of the excess of (a) the fair market value of the asset as
of the beginning of the applicable Recognition Period over (b) the Company's
adjusted basis in such asset as of the beginning of such Recognition Period (the
"Built-In Gain"), such gain will be subject to tax at the highest regular
corporate rate, pursuant to guidelines issued by the IRS (the "Built-In Gain
Rules").
REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFICATION
To qualify as a REIT, the Company has elected to be so treated and must
meet the requirements, discussed below, relating to the Company's organization,
sources of income, nature of assets and distributions of income to stockholders.
ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS. The Code defines a REIT as a corporation,
trust or association: (i) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors,
(ii) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares or by
transferable certificates of beneficial interest, (iii) that would be taxable as
a domestic corporation but for the REIT requirements, (iv) that is neither a
financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of
the Code, (v) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons,
and (vi) during the last half of each taxable year not more than 50% in value of
the outstanding stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, through the
application of certain attribution rules, by five or fewer individuals (as
defined in the Code to include certain entities). In addition, certain other
tests regarding the nature of its income and assets, described below, also must
be satisfied. The Code provides that conditions (i) through (iv), inclusive,
must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (v) must be met
during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a
proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. For purposes of
conditions (v) and (vi), pension funds and certain other tax-exempt entities are
treated as individuals or persons, subject to a "look-through" exception in the
case of condition (vi). In addition, the Company's Articles of Incorporation
currently include certain restrictions regarding transfer of its Common Stock,
which restrictions are intended (among other things) to assist the Company in
continuing to satisfy conditions (v) and (vi) above.
In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, Treasury
Regulations provide that the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share
of the assets of the partnership and will be deemed to be entitled to the income
of the partnership attributable to such share. In addition, the character of the
assets and gross income of the partnership retain the same character in the
hands of the REIT for purposes of Section 856 of the Code, including satisfying
the gross income tests and asset tests. Thus, the Company's proportionate share
of the assets, liabilities and items of income of the Operating Partnership
(including the Operating Partnership's share of the assets and liabilities and
items of income with respect to any partnership in which it holds an interest)
will be treated as assets, liabilities and items of income of the Company for
purposes of applying the requirements described herein.
INCOME TESTS. In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, the Company
annually must satisfy three gross income requirements. First, at least 75% of
the Company's gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions)
for each taxable year must be derived directly or indirectly from investments
relating to real property; including investments in other REITs, or mortgages on
real property (including "rents from real property" and, in certain
circumstances, interest) or from certain types of temporary investments. Second,
at least 95% of the Company's gross income (excluding gross income from
prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must be derived from such real
property investments, dividends, interest and gain from the sale or disposition
of stock or securities (or from any combination of the foregoing). Third,
short-term gain from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities, gain
from prohibited transactions
35
<PAGE>
and gain on the sale or other disposition of real property held for less than
four years (apart from involuntary conversions and sales of foreclosure
property) must represent less than 30% of the Company's gross income (including
gross income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year.
Rents received by the Company will qualify as "rents from real property" in
satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if
several conditions are met. First, the amount of rent must not be based in whole
or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount received
or accrued generally will not be excluded from the term "rents from real
property" solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages
of receipts or sales. Second, the Code provides that rents received from a
tenant will not qualify as "rents from real property" in satisfying the gross
income tests if the REIT, or an owner of 10% of more of the REIT, directly or
constructively owns 10% or more of such tenant (a "Related Party Tenant").
Third, if rent attributable to personal property, leased in connection with a
lease of real property, is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the
lease, then the portion of rent attributable to such personal property will not
qualify as "rents from real property." Finally, for rents received to qualify as
"rents from real property," the REIT generally must not operate or manage the
property or furnish or render services to the tenants of such property, other
than through an independent contractor from whom the REIT derives no revenue,
provided, however, the Company may directly perform certain services that are
"usually or customarily rendered" in connection with the rental of space for
occupancy only and are not otherwise considered "rendered to the occupant" of
the property.
The Company does not currently charge and does not anticipate charging rent
that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. The
Company also does not anticipate either deriving rent attributable to personal
property leased in connection with real property that exceeds 15% of the total
rents or receiving rent from Related Party Tenants.
The Operating Partnership does provide certain services with respect to the
Properties. The Company believes that the services with respect to the
Properties that are and will be provided directly are usually or customarily
rendered in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are not
otherwise rendered to particular tenants and therefore that the provision of
such services will not cause rents received with respect to the Properties to
fail to qualify as rents from real property. Services with respect to the
Properties that the Company believes may not be provided by the Company or the
Operating Partnership directly without jeopardizing the qualification of rent as
"rents from real property" will be performed by independent contractors.
The Operating Partnership and the Company receive fees in consideration of
the performance of property management and brokerage and leasing services with
respect to certain Properties not owned entirely by the Operating Partnership.
Such fees will not qualify under the 75% or the 95% gross income tests. The
Operating Partnership also may receive certain other types of income with
respect to the properties it owns that will not qualify for either of these
tests. In addition, distributions on the Operating Partnership's stock in the
Service Companies and its allocable portion of the income earned by
Forsyth-Carter Brokerage will not qualify under the 75% gross income test. The
Company believes, however, that the aggregate amount of such fees and other
non-qualifying income in any taxable year, which represents approximately 3.6%
of the Company's gross income on a pro forma basis and 1.0% of the Company's
income on an actual basis for the year ended December 31, 1995, will not cause
the Company to exceed the limits on non-qualifying income under either the 75%
or the 95% gross income test.
If the Company fails to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income
tests for any taxable year, it may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for that year
if it is eligible for relief under certain provisions of the Code. These relief
provisions will be generally available if (i) the Company's failure to meet
these tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, (ii) the
Company attaches a schedule of the sources of its income to its Federal income
tax return and (iii) any incorrect information on the schedule is not due to
fraud with intent to evade tax. It is not possible, however, to state whether in
all circumstances the Company would be entitled to the benefit of these relief
provisions. For example, if the Company fails to satisfy the gross income tests
because non-qualifying income that the Company intentionally incurs exceeds the
limits on such income, the IRS could conclude that the Company's failure to
satisfy the tests was not due to reasonable cause. As discussed above in
" -- Federal Income Taxation of the Company," even if these relief provisions
apply, a tax would be imposed with respect to the excess net income. No similar
36
<PAGE>
mitigation provision provides relief if the Company fails the 30% income test,
and in such case, the Company would cease to qualify as a REIT.
ASSET TESTS. At the close of each quarter of its taxable year, the Company
also must satisfy three tests relating to the nature and diversification of its
assets. First, at least 75% of the value of the Company's total assets must be
represented by real estate assets, including shares in other REITs, cash, cash
items and government securities. Second, no more than 25% of the Company's total
assets may be represented by securities other than those in the 75% asset class.
Third, of the investments included in the 25% asset class, the value of any one
issuer's securities owned by the Company may not exceed 5% of the value of the
Company's total assets, and the Company may not own more than 10% of any one
issuer's outstanding voting securities.
The 5% test must generally be met for any quarter in which the Company
acquires securities of an issuer. Thus, this requirement must be satisfied not
only on the date on which the Company acquired the securities of the Service
Companies, but also each time the Company increases its ownership of their
respective securities (including as a result of increasing its interest in the
Operating Partnership as limited partners exercise their redemption rights).
Although the Company plans to take steps to ensure that it satisfies the 5%
value test for any quarter with respect to which retesting is to occur, there
can be no assurance that such steps will always be successful or will not
require a reduction in the Company's overall interest in either of the Service
Companies.
The Operating Partnership owns 100% of the nonvoting stock and 1% of the
voting stock of each of the Service Companies, and by virtue of its ownership of
Units, the Company will be considered to own its pro rata share of such stock.
See "The Company and the Operating Partnership". Neither the Company nor the
Operating Partnership, however, will own more than 1% of the voting securities
of either of the Service Companies. In addition, the Company and its senior
management do not believe that the Company's pro rata share of the value of the
securities of either of the Service Companies exceeds 5% of the total value of
the Company's assets. The Company's belief is based in part upon its analysis of
the estimated value of the securities of each of the Service Companies owned by
the Operating Partnership relative to the estimated value of the other assets
owned by the Operating Partnership. No independent appraisals will be obtained
to support this conclusion, and Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., in
rendering its opinion as to the qualification of the Company as a REIT, is
relying on the conclusions of the Company and its senior management as to the
value of the securities of each of the Service Companies. There can be no
assurance, however, that the IRS might not contend that the value of such
securities held by the Company (through the Operating Partnership) exceeds the
5% value limitation.
After initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, the
Company will not lose its status as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset
tests at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in asset values.
If the failure to satisfy the asset tests results from an acquisition of
securities or other property during a quarter, the failure can be cured by
disposition of sufficient non-qualifying assets within 30 days after the close
of that quarter. The Company intends to maintain adequate records of the value
of its assets to ensure compliance with the asset tests and to take such other
actions within 30 days after the close of any quarter as may be required to cure
any noncompliance.
ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS. In order to be taxed as a REIT, the
Company is required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends)
to its stockholders in an amount at least equal to (a) the sum of (i) 95% of the
Company's "REIT taxable income" (computed without regard to the dividends-paid
deduction and the Company's capital gain) and (ii) 95% of the net income, if
any, from foreclosure property in excess of the special tax on income from
foreclosure property, minus (b) the sum of certain items of non-cash income.
Such distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in
the following taxable year, if declared before the Company timely files its
Federal income tax return for such year and if paid on or before the first
regular dividend payment after such declaration. Even if the Company satisfies
the foregoing distribution requirements, to the extent that the Company does not
distribute all of its net capital gain or "REIT taxable income" as adjusted, it
will be subject to tax thereon at regular capital gains or ordinary corporate
tax rates. Furthermore, if the Company should fail to distribute during each
calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of its ordinary income for that year,
(b) 95% of its capital gain net income for that year and (c) any undistributed
taxable income from prior periods, the Company would be subject to a
37
<PAGE>
4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts
actually distributed. In addition, during its Recognition Period, if the Company
disposes of any asset subject to the Built-In Gain Rules, the Company will be
required, pursuant to guidance issued by the IRS, to distribute at least 95% of
the Built-In Gain (after tax), if any, recognized on the disposition of the
asset.
The Company intends to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy the
annual distribution requirements. In this regard, the Operating Partnership
Agreement authorizes the Company, as general partner, to take such steps as may
be necessary to cause the Operating Partnership to distribute to its partners an
amount sufficient to permit the Company to meet these distribution requirements.
It is expected that the Company's REIT taxable income will be less than its
cash flow due to the allowance of depreciation and other non-cash charges in
computing REIT taxable income. Accordingly, the Company anticipates that it will
generally have sufficient cash or liquid assets to enable it to satisfy the 95%
distribution requirement. It is possible, however, that the Company, from time
to time, may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 95%
distribution requirement or to distribute such greater amount as may be
necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, due to timing differences between
(i) the actual receipt of income and the actual payment of deductible expenses
and (ii) the inclusion of such income and the deduction of such expenses in
arriving at taxable income of the Company, or as a result of nondeductible cash
expenditures such as principal amortization or capital expenditures in excess of
noncash deductions. In the event that such timing differences occur, the Company
may find it necessary to arrange for borrowings or, if possible, pay taxable
stock dividends in order to meet the distribution requirement.
Under certain circumstances, the Company may be able to rectify a failure
to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying "deficiency dividends"
to shareholders in a later year, which may be included in the Company's
deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, the Company may be able
to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends. The Company
will, however, be required to pay interest based upon the amount of any
deduction taken for deficiency dividends.
FAILURE TO QUALIFY
If the Company fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year
and the relief provisions do not apply, the Company will be subject to tax
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at
regular corporate rates. Distributions to shareholders in any year in which the
Company fails to qualify will not be deductible by the Company nor will they be
required to be made. In such event, to the extent of current or accumulated
earnings and profits, all distributions to stockholders will be dividends,
taxable as ordinary income, except that, subject to certain limitations of the
Code, corporate distributees may be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction. Unless the Company is entitled to relief under specific statutory
provisions, the Company also will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for
the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost.
It is not possible to state whether in all circumstances the Company would be
entitled to such statutory relief. For example, if the Company fails to satisfy
the gross income tests because non-qualifying income that the Company
intentionally incurs exceeds the limit on such income, the IRS could conclude
that the Company's failure to satisfy the tests was not due to reasonable cause.
TAXATION OF U.S. STOCKHOLDERS
As used herein, the term "U.S. Stockholder" means a holder of Common Stock
that (for Federal income tax purposes) (a) is a citizen or resident of the
United States, (b) is a corporation, partnership or other entity created or
organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political
subdivision thereof or (c) is an estate or trust, the income of which is subject
to Federal income taxation regardless of its source. For any taxable year for
which the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, amounts distributed to
taxable U.S. Stockholders will be taxed as discussed below.
DISTRIBUTIONS GENERALLY. Distributions to U.S. Stockholders, other than
capital gain dividends discussed below, will constitute dividends up to the
amount of the Company's current or accumulated earnings and profits and, to that
extent, will be taxable to the stockholders as ordinary income. These
distributions are not eligible for the dividends-received deduction for
corporations. To the extent that the Company makes a distribution in excess of
its current or accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be
treated first
38
<PAGE>
as a tax-free return of capital, reducing the tax basis in the U.S.
Stockholder's Common Stock, and the distribution in excess of such basis will be
taxable as gain realized from the sale of its Common Stock. Dividends declared
by the Company in October, November or December of any year payable to a
stockholder of record on a specified date in any such month shall be treated as
both paid by the Company and received by the stockholders on December 31 of the
year, provided that the dividends are actually paid by the Company during
January of the following calendar year. Stockholders are not allowed to include
on their own Federal income tax returns any tax losses of the Company.
The Company will be treated as having sufficient earnings and profits to
treat as a dividend any distribution by the Company up to the amount required to
be distributed in order to avoid imposition of the 4% excise tax discussed in
" -- Federal Income Taxation of the Company" above. Moreover, any "deficiency
dividend" will be treated as an ordinary or capital gain dividend, as the case
may be, regardless of the Company's earnings and profits. As a result,
stockholders may be required to treat certain distributions that would otherwise
result in a tax-free return of capital as taxable dividends.
CAPITAL GAIN DISTRIBUTIONS. Distributions to U.S. Stockholders that are
properly designated by the Company as capital gain distributions will be treated
as long-term capital gains (to the extent they do not exceed the Company's
actual net capital gain) for the taxable year without regard to the period for
which the stockholder has held his stock. However, corporate stockholders may be
required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as ordinary
income. Capital gain dividends are not eligible for the dividends-received
deduction for corporations.
PASSIVE ACTIVITY LOSS AND INVESTMENT INTEREST LIMITATIONS. Distributions
from the Company and gain from the disposition of Common Stock will not be
treated as passive activity income, and therefore stockholders will not be able
to apply any "passive losses" against such income. Dividends from the Company
(to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital) will generally be
treated as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitation;
net capital gain from the disposition of Common Stock or capital gain dividends
generally will be excluded from investment income.
CERTAIN DISPOSITIONS OF SHARES. Losses incurred on the sale or exchange of
Common Stock held for less than six months (after applying certain holding
period rules) will be deemed long-term capital loss to the extent of any capital
gain dividends received by the selling stockholder from those shares.
TREATMENT OF TAX-EXEMPT STOCKHOLDERS. Distributions from the Company to a
tax-exempt employee pension trust or other domestic tax-exempt shareholder
generally will not constitute "unrelated business taxable income" ("UBTI")
unless the stockholder has borrowed to acquire or carry its Common Stock.
Qualified trusts that hold more than 10% (by value) of the shares of certain
REITs may be required to treat a certain percentage of such a REIT's
distributions as UBTI. This requirement will apply only if (i) the REIT would
not qualify as such for Federal income tax purposes but for the application of a
"look-through" exception to the five or fewer requirement applicable to shares
held by qualified trusts and (ii) the REIT is "predominantly held" by qualified
trusts. A REIT is predominantly held if either (i) a single qualified trust
holds more than 25% by value of the REIT interests or (ii) one or more qualified
trusts, each owning more than 10% by value of the REIT interests, hold in the
aggregate more than 50% of the REIT interests. The percentage of any REIT
dividend treated as UBTI is equal to the ratio of (a) the UBTI earned by the
REIT (treating the REIT as if it were a qualified trust and therefore subject to
tax on UBTI) to (b) the total gross income (less certain associated expenses) of
the REIT. A de minimis exception applies where the ratio set forth in the
preceding sentence is less than 5% for any year. For these purposes, a qualified
trust is any trust described in Section 401 (a) of the Code and exempt from tax
under Section 501(a) of the Code. The provisions requiring qualified trusts to
treat a portion of REIT distributions as UBTI will not apply if the REIT is able
to satisfy the five or fewer requirement without relying upon the "look-through"
exception. The restrictions on ownership of Common Stock in the Articles of
Incorporation generally will prevent application of the provisions treating a
portion of REIT distributions as UBTI to tax-exempt entities purchasing Common
Stock, absent a waiver of the restrictions by the Board of Directors.
39
<PAGE>
SPECIAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR NON-U.S. STOCKHOLDERS
The rules governing United States income taxation of non-resident alien
individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships and foreign trusts and
estates (collectively, "Non-U.S. Stockholders") are complex, and the following
discussion is intended only as a summary of these rules. Prospective Non-U.S.
Stockholders should consult with their own tax advisors to determine the impact
of Federal, state and local income tax laws on an investment in the Company,
including any reporting requirements.
In general, Non-U.S. Stockholders will be subject to regular Federal income
tax with respect to their investment in the Company if the investment is
"effectively connected" with the Non-U.S. Stockholder's conduct of a trade or
business in the United States. A corporate Non-U.S. Stockholder that receives
income that is (or is treated as) effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business may also be subject to the branch profits tax under Section 884 of the
Code, which is payable in addition to regular United States Federal corporate
income tax. The following discussion will apply to Non-U.S. Stockholders whose
investment in the Company is not so effectively connected.
A distribution by the Company that is not attributable to gain from the
sale or exchange by the Company of a United States real property interest and
that is not designated by the Company as a capital gain distribution will be
treated as an ordinary income dividend to the extent that it is made out of
current or accumulated earnings and profits. Generally, any ordinary income
dividend will be subject to a Federal income tax equal to 30% of the gross
amount of the dividend unless this tax is reduced by an applicable tax treaty.
Such a distribution in excess of the Company's earnings and profits will be
treated first as a return of capital that will reduce a Non-U.S. Stockholder's
basis in its Common Stock (but not below zero) and then as gain from the
disposition of such shares, the tax treatment of which is described under the
rules discussed below with respect to dispositions of Common Stock.
Distributions by the Company that are attributable to gain from the sale or
exchange of a United States real property interest will be taxed to a Non-U.S.
Stockholder under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980
("FIRPTA"). Under FIRPTA, such distributions are taxed to a Non-U.S. Stockholder
as if the distributions were gains "effectively connected" with a United States
trade or business. Accordingly, a Non-U.S. Stockholder will be taxed at the
normal capital gain rates applicable to a U.S. Stockholder (subject to any
applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the
case of non-resident alien individuals).
Although tax treaties may reduce the Company's withholding obligations, the
Company generally will be required to withhold from distributions to Non-U.S.
Stockholders, and remit to the IRS, (i) 35% of designated capital gain dividends
(or, if greater, 35% of the amount of any distributions that could be designated
as capital gain dividends) and (ii) 30% of ordinary dividends paid out of
earnings and profits. In addition, if the Company designates prior distributions
as capital gain dividends, subsequent distributions, up to the amount of such
prior distributions, will be treated as capital gain dividends for purposes of
withholding. A distribution in excess of the Company's earnings and profits will
be subject to 30% dividend withholding. If the amount of tax withheld by the
Company with respect to a distribution to a Non-U.S. Stockholder exceeds the
stockholder's United States tax liability with respect to such distribution, the
Non-U.S. Stockholder may file for a refund of such excess from the IRS.
Unless the Common Stock constitutes a "United States real property
interest" within the meaning of FIRPTA, a sale of Common Stock by a Non-U.S.
Stockholder generally will not be subject to Federal income taxation. The Common
Stock will not constitute a United States real property interest if the Company
is a "domestically controlled REIT." A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in
which at all times during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of
its shares is held directly or indirectly by Non-U.S. Stockholders. It is
currently anticipated that the Company will be a domestically controlled REIT
and therefore that the sale of Common Stock will not be subject to taxation
under FIRPTA. However, because the Common Stock will be publicly traded, no
assurance can be given that the Company will continue to be a domestically
controlled REIT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, capital gains not subject to
FIRPTA will be taxable to a Non-U.S. Stockholder if the Non-U.S. Stockholder is
a non-resident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days
or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions apply, in which
case the non-resident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on his or
her U.S. source capital gains. If the Company were not a domestically controlled
REIT, whether a Non-U.S. Stockholder's sale of
40
<PAGE>
Common Stock would be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a United States
real property interest would depend on whether the Common Stock were "regularly
traded" on an established securities market (such as the New York Stock
Exchange) on which the Common Stock will be listed and on the size of the
selling stockholder's interest in the Company. If the gain on the sale of Common
Stock were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the Non-U.S. Stockholder would be
subject to the same treatment as a U.S. Stockholder with respect to the gain
(subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum
tax in the case of non-resident alien individuals). In addition, distributions
that are treated as gain from the disposition of Common Stock and that are
subject to tax under FIRPTA also may be subject to a 30% branch profit tax when
made to a foreign corporate stockholder that is not entitled to either a reduced
rate or an exemption under a treaty. In any event, a purchaser of Common Stock
from a Non-U.S. Stockholder will not be required to withhold under FIRPTA on the
purchase price if the purchased Common Stock is "regularly traded" on an
established securities market or if the Company is a domestically controlled
REIT. Otherwise, under FIRPTA the purchaser of Common Stock from a Non-U.S.
Stockholder may be required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit this
amount to the IRS.
INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING TAX
Under certain circumstances, U.S. Stockholders may be subject to backup
withholding at a rate of 31% on payments made with respect to, or cash proceeds
of a sale or exchange of, Common Stock. Backup withholding will apply only if
the holder (i) fails to furnish his or her taxpayer identification number
("TIN") (which, for an individual, would be his or her Social Security Number),
(ii) furnishes an incorrect TIN, (iii) is notified by the IRS that he or she has
failed to report properly payments of interest and dividends or is otherwise
subject to backup withholding or (iv) under certain circumstances, fails to
certify, under penalties of perjury, that he or she has furnished a correct TIN
and (a) that he or she has not been notified by the IRS that he or she is
subject to backup withholding for failure to report interest and dividend
payments or (b) that he or she has been notified by the IRS that he or she is no
longer subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding will not apply with
respect to payments made to certain exempt recipients, such as corporations and
tax-exempt organizations.
U.S. Stockholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding their
qualifications for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for
obtaining such an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax.
Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to a payment to a U.S.
Stockholder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Stockholder's United
States Federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Stockholder to a
refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Additional issues may arise pertaining to information reporting and backup
withholding for Non-U.S. Stockholders. Non-U.S. Stockholders should consult
their tax advisors with regard to U.S. information reporting and backup
withholding.
TAX ASPECTS OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
GENERAL. Substantially all of the Company's investments are held through
the Operating Partnership. In general, partnerships are "pass-through" entities
which are not subject to Federal income tax. Rather, partners are allocated
their proportionate shares of the items of income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit of a partnership, and are potentially subject to tax thereon, without
regard to whether the partners receive a distribution from the partnership. The
Company includes in its income its proportionate share of the foregoing
Operating Partnership items for purposes of the various REIT income tests and in
the computation of its REIT taxable income. Moreover, for purposes of the REIT
asset tests, the Company includes its proportionate share of assets held by the
Operating Partnership.
ENTITY CLASSIFICATION. The Company's interest in the Operating Partnership
involves special tax considerations, including the possibility of a challenge by
the IRS of the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership (as opposed
to an association taxable as a corporation) for Federal income tax purposes. If
the Operating Partnership is treated as an association, it would be taxable as a
corporation and therefore subject to an entity-level tax on its income. In such
a situation, the character of the Company's assets and items of
41
<PAGE>
gross income would change, which would prevent the Company from qualifying as a
REIT. See " -- Failure to Qualify" above for a discussion of the effect of the
Company's failure to meet such tests for a taxable year. In addition, any change
in the Operating Partnership's status for tax purposes might be treated as a
taxable event in which case the Company might incur a tax liability without any
related cash distributions.
An organization formed as a partnership will be treated as a partnership
for Federal income tax purposes rather than as a corporation only if it has no
more than two of the four corporate characteristics that the Treasury
Regulations use to distinguish a partnership from a corporation for tax
purposes. These four characteristics are (i) continuity of life, (ii)
centralization of management, (iii) limited liability and (iv) free
transferability of interests. The Operating Partnership has not requested, and
does not intend to request, a ruling from the IRS that it will be treated as a
partnership for Federal income tax purposes. Instead, in connection with the
filing of the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part, Smith
Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. has delivered its opinion dated June 3, 1996 to
the effect that based on the provisions of the Operating Partnership's
partnership agreement (the "Partnership Agreement"), certain factual assumptions
and certain representations described in the opinion, the Operating Partnership
will be treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. Smith Helms
Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. undertakes no obligation to update this opinion
subsequent to such date. Unlike a private letter ruling, an opinion of counsel
is not binding on the IRS, and no assurance can be given that the IRS will not
challenge the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership for Federal
income tax purposes.
TAX ALLOCATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTIES. Pursuant to Section 704(c)
of the Code, income, gain, loss and deduction attributable to appreciated or
depreciated property (such as the Properties) that is contributed to a
partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership, must be allocated in
a manner such that the contributing partner is charged with, or benefits from,
respectively, the unrealized gain or unrealized loss associated with the
property at the time of the contribution. The amount of such unrealized gain or
unrealized loss in generally equal to the difference between the fair market
value of contributed property at the time of contribution, and the adjusted tax
basis of such property at the time of contribution (a "Book-Tax Difference").
Such allocations are solely for Federal income tax purposes and do not affect
the book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among the
partners. The Operating Partnership was formed by way of contributions of
appreciated property (including the Properties). Consequently, the Partnership
Agreement requires such allocations to be made in a manner consistent with
Section 704(c) of the Code.
In general, the partners who have contributed partnership interests in the
Properties to the Operating Partnership (the "Contributing Partners") will be
allocated lower amounts of depreciation deductions for tax purposes than such
deductions would be if determined on a pro rata basis. In addition, in the event
of the disposition of any of the contributed assets (including the Properties)
which have a Book-Tax Difference, all income attributable to such Book-Tax
Difference will generally be allocated to the Contributing Partners, and the
Company will generally be allocated only its share of capital gains attributable
to appreciation, if any, occurring after the closing of any offering of
Securities. This will tend to eliminate the Book-Tax Difference over the life of
the Operating Partnership. However, the special allocation rules of Section
704(c) do not always entirely eliminate the Book-Tax Difference on an annual
basis or with respect to a specific taxable transaction such a sale. Thus, the
carryover basis of the contributed assets in the hands of the Operating
Partnership will cause the Company to be allocated lower depreciation and other
deductions, and possibly amounts of taxable income in the event of a sale of
such contributed assets in excess of the economic or book income allocated to it
as a result of such sale. This may cause the Company to recognize taxable income
in excess of cash proceeds, which might adversely affect the Company's ability
to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. See " -- Requirements for
Qualification -- ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS."
Treasury Regulations under Section 704(c) of the Code provide partnerships
with a choice of several methods of accounting for Book-Tax Differences,
including retention of the "traditional method" under current law, or the
election of certain methods which would permit any distortions caused by a
Book-Tax Difference to be entirely rectified on an annual basis or with respect
to a specific taxable transaction such as a sale. The Operating Partnership and
the Company have determined to use the "traditional method" for accounting for
Book-Tax Differences with respect to the Properties contributed to the
Partnership. As a result of such determination, distributions to shareholders
will be comprised of a greater portion of taxable
42
<PAGE>
income rather than a return of capital. The Operating Partnership and the
Company have not determined which of the alternative methods of accounting for
Book-Tax Differences will be elected with respect to Properties contributed to
the Partnership in the future.
With respect to any property purchased by the Operating Partnership, such
property will initially have a tax basis equal to its fair market value and
Section 704(c) of the Code will not apply.
BASIS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP INTEREST. The Company's adjusted tax basis
in its interest in the Operating Partnership generally (i) will be equal to the
amount of cash and the basis of any other property contributed to the Operating
Partnership by the Company, (ii) will be increased by (a) its allocable share of
the Operating Partnership's income and (b) its allocable share of indebtedness
of the Operating Partnership and (iii) will be reduced, but not below zero, by
the Company's allocable share of (a) losses suffered by the Operating
Partnership, (b) the amount of cash distributed to the Company and (c) by
constructive distributions resulting from a reduction in the Company's share of
indebtedness of the Operating Partnership.
If the allocation of the Company's distributive share of the Operating
Partnership's loss exceeds the adjusted tax basis of the Company's partnership
interest in the Operating Partnership, the recognition of such excess loss will
be deferred until such time and to the extent that the Company has an adjusted
tax basis in its partnership interest. To the extent that the Operating
Partnership's distributions, or any decrease in the Company's share of the
indebtedness of the Operating Partnership (such decreases being considered a
cash distribution to the partners), exceed the Company's adjusted tax basis,
such excess distributions (including such constructive distributions) constitute
taxable income to the Company. Such taxable income will normally be
characterized as a capital gain, and if the Company's interest in the Operating
Partnership has been held for longer than the long-term capital gains. Under
current law, capital gains and ordinary income of corporations are generally
taxed at the same marginal rates.
SALE OF THE PROPERTIES. The Company's share of gain realized by the
Operating Partnership on the sale of any property held by the Operating
Partnership as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers
in the ordinary course of the Operating Partnership's trade or business will be
treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100%
penalty tax. See " -- Federal Income Taxation of the Company -- INCOME TESTS."
Such prohibited transaction income may also have an adverse effect upon the
Company's ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT. Under
existing law, whether property is held as inventory or primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of the Operating Partnership's trade or
business is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances
with respect to the particular transaction. The Operating Partnership intends to
hold the Properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to
engage in the business of acquiring, developing, owning, and operating the
Properties (and other properties) and to make such occasional sales of the
Properties, including peripheral land, as are consistent with the Operating
Partnership's investment objectives.
OTHER TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FEDERAL TAX ASPECTS OF THE CROCKER ACQUISITION. Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement, Cedar Acquisition Corporation ("Cedar"), a newly formed
subsidiary of Highwoods, will merge into Crocker with Highwoods becoming the
sole stockholder of Crocker. Highwoods intends to contribute the shares of
common stock of Crocker to the Operating Partnership in exchange for limited
partnership interests therein. As a result, Crocker would become a subsidiary of
the Operating Partnership. Except for the Federal and state income taxes that
might be payable upon the distribution of certain assets which will be
distributed directly or indirectly to the stockholders of Crocker prior to the
Merger (the "Excluded Assets"), which taxes are to be reimbursed to Crocker by
the distributee stockholders, the Merger has been structured to defer any tax
recognition to Crocker. To accomplish this, the Company intends to maintain
Crocker's separate status as an operating REIT. To maintain Crocker's REIT
status, the Company intends to cause Crocker to sell a sufficient amount of
common stock to at least 110 individuals to enable Crocker to meet the test for
qualification of a REIT under Section 856(a)(5) of the Code. The aggregate
amount of common stock to be issued to such minority stockholders is not
expected to exceed 1.0% of the equity of Crocker.
The Merger is a taxable purchase of 100% of the outstanding stock of
Crocker, which will be taxable to the selling stockholders of Crocker but,
except as described below relative to the Excluded Assets, will not be taxable
at the Crocker corporate or subsidiary level. The Company's tax basis in its
Crocker stock
43
<PAGE>
will be equal to the total cash it pays in the Merger for the Crocker stock,
stock options and warrants. No gain or loss will result to the Company from the
Merger. Following the Merger, the Company will transfer all of the stock of
Crocker to the Operating Partnership in exchange for Units and the settlement of
certain intercompany indebtedness that was used to finance the Merger. This
transaction will be a nontaxable transfer of property to a partnership in
exchange for ownership interests in the partnership. The Company's tax basis in
the Units so acquired will be equal to its tax basis in the Crocker stock
transferred to the Operating Partnership and no gain or loss should be realized
by Crocker, the Company or the Operating Partnership as a result of this
transaction.
The Company expects Crocker at all times to maintain its status as a REIT
and to continue to be organized and operated so as to maintain its qualification
as a REIT. Since the ownership of Crocker stock by the Operating Partnership is
considered to be the ownership of a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT
qualification tests and since distributions received from a REIT are income
included in both the 95% and 75% income tests of Code Sections 856(c)(2) and
(3), the Company's qualification as a REIT should not be affected by the
acquisition and ownership of Crocker. If, however, Crocker fails to qualify as a
REIT for any reason while its shares are owned by the Company or the Operating
Partnership, the Company will no longer qualify as a REIT and the Company would
be taxed as if it were a domestic corporation and its stockholders would be
taxed in the same manner as stockholders of ordinary corporations. In that
event, the Company could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities
and, therefore, the amount of cash available for distribution to its
stockholders would be substantially reduced or eliminated.
The Company believes, and Crocker has represented that, commencing with
Crocker's taxable year ended December 31, 1995, Crocker has operated in such a
manner so as to meet the Code requirements for qualification as a REIT.
Crocker's qualification as a REIT is a condition to the Company's obligation to
consummate the Merger.
SERVICE COMPANIES. A portion of the amounts to be used to fund
distributions to stockholders is expected to come from the Operating Partnership
from distributions on stock of the Service Companies held by the Operating
Partnership. Neither of the Service Companies will qualify as a REIT, and the
Service Companies will pay Federal, state and local income taxes on their
taxable incomes at normal corporate rates. Any Federal, state or local income
taxes that the Service Companies are required to pay will reduce the cash
available for distribution by the Company to its stockholders.
As described above, the value of the securities of each of the Service
Companies held by the Company cannot exceed 5% of the value of the Company's
assets at a time when a Unit holder in the Operating Partnership exercises his
or her redemption right (or the Company otherwise is considered to acquire
additional securities of either of the Service Companies). See " -- Federal
Income Taxation of the Company." This limitation may restrict the ability of
each of the Service Companies to increase the size of its respective business
unless the value of the assets of the Company is increasing at a commensurate
rate.
STATE AND LOCAL TAX
The Company and its stockholders may be subject to state and local tax in
various states and localities, including those in which it or they transact
business, own property, or reside. The tax treatment of the Company and the
stockholders in such jurisdictions may differ from the Federal income tax
treatment described above. Consequently, prospective stockholders should consult
their own tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an
investment in the Common Stock of the Company.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Company and the Operating Partnership may sell the Securities to one or
more underwriters for public offering and sale by them or may sell the
Securities to investors directly or through agents. Any such underwriter or
agent involved in the offer and sale of the Securities will be named in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement.
Underwriters may offer and sell the Securities at a fixed price or prices,
which may be changed, at prices related to the prevailing market prices at the
time of sale or at negotiated prices. The Company and the Operating Partnership
also may, from time to time, authorize underwriters acting as their agents to
offer
44
<PAGE>
and sell the Securities upon the terms and conditions as are set forth in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement. In connection with the sale of Securities,
underwriters may be deemed to have received compensation from the Company or the
Operating Partnership in the form of underwriting discounts or commissions and
may also receive commissions from purchasers of Securities for whom they may act
as agent. Underwriters may sell Securities to or through dealers, and such
dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or
commissions from the underwriters and/or commissions from the purchasers for
whom they may act as agent.
Any underwriting compensation paid by the Company or the Operating
Partnership to underwriters or agents in connection with the offering of
Securities, and any discounts, concessions or commissions allowed by
underwriters to participating dealers, are set forth in the applicable
Prospectus Supplement. Underwriters, dealers and agents participating in the
distribution of the Securities may be deemed to be underwriters, and any
discounts and commissions received by them and any profit realized by them on
resale of the Securities may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and
commissions, under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act").
Underwriters, dealers and agents may be entitled, under agreements entered into
with the Company and the Operating Partnership, to indemnification against and
contribution toward certain civil liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
If so indicated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the Company and
the Operating Partnership will authorize dealers acting as their agents to
solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase Securities from them at the
public offering price set forth in such Prospectus Supplement pursuant to
Delayed Delivery Contracts ("Contracts") providing for payment and delivery on
the date or dates stated in such Prospectus Supplement. Each Contract will be
for an amount not less than, and the aggregate principal amount of Securities
sold pursuant to Contracts shall be not less nor more than, the respective
amounts stated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. Institutions with whom
Contracts, when authorized, may be made include commercial and savings banks,
insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and
charitable institutions, and other institutions but will in all cases be subject
to the approval of the Company and the Operating Partnership. Contracts will not
be subject to any conditions except (i) the purchase by an institution of the
Securities covered by its Contracts shall not at the time of delivery be
prohibited under the laws of any jurisdiction in the United States to which such
institution is subject, and (ii) if the Securities are being sold to
underwriters, the Company and the Operating Partnership shall have sold to such
underwriters the total principal amount of the Securities less the principal
amount thereof covered by Contracts.
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates may be customers of,
engage in transactions with and perform services for the Company and the
Operating Partnership in the ordinary course of business.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of Highwoods Properties,
Inc., incorporated herein by reference from the Company's Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995, the Combined Statement of Revenue
and Certain Expenses of TBC Parkway Plaza, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1994, incorporated herein by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K, dated December 18, 1995, the Combined Statement of Revenue and Certain
Expenses of the Acquired Properties for the year ended December 31, 1994,
incorporated herein by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated July 12, 1995 (as amended on Form 8-K/A on September 6, 1995), the
Combined Statement of Revenue and Certain Expenses of Research Commons for the
year ended December 31, 1994, incorporated herein by reference from the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 10, 1995, the combined
financial statements and schedule of Eakin & Smith for the year ended December
31, 1995, incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K/A dated April 1, 1996 as amended on June 3, 1996 and June 18, 1996 and the
Historical Summary of Gross Income and Direct Operating Expenses for certain
properties owned by Towermarc Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995,
incorporated herein by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K/A, dated April 29, 1996 as amended on June 3, 1996 and June 18, 1996 have
been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their
reports thereon included therein and incorporated herein by reference. Such
financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such
reports given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
45
<PAGE>
The financial statements and schedule of Highwoods/Forsyth Limited
Partnership at December 31, 1995 and for the period June 14, 1994 to December
31, 1994 and the year ended December 31, 1995 and the combined financial
statements of the Highwoods Group at December 31, 1993 and for the period
January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and the year ended December 31, 1993 appearing
in this Prospectus and Registration Statement have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing
elsewhere herein and in the Registration Statement, and are included in reliance
upon such reports given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
The combined financial statements and the schedule of real estate and
accumulated depreciation of the Forsyth Group, incorporated herein by reference
from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 10, 1995, have
been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in
their report thereon included therein and incorporated herein by reference. Such
financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such
report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The financial statements of Crocker Realty Trust, Inc. as of December 31,
1995 and for the year then ended, the financial statements of Crocker & Sons,
Inc. as of December 31, 1994 and for the year then ended, and the financial
statements of Crocker Realty Investors, Inc. as of December 31, 1994 and 1993,
and for the two years ended December 31, 1994, have been incorporated herein by
reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 29, 1996
as amended on June 3, 1996 and June 18, 1996, in reliance upon the reports of
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent certified public accountants, appearing
elsewhere incorporated by reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm
as experts in accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of Southeast Realty Corp., AP Southeast
Portfolio Partners, L.P. and AP Fontaine III Partners, L.P. as of December 31,
1994 and for the year ended December 31, 1994, and the financial statements of
AP Fontaine III Partners, L.P. for the period from October 28, 1993 (date of
inception) through December 31, 1993 incorporated herein by reference from the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 29, 1996 as amended on June
3, 1996 and June 18, 1996, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon included therein and
incorporated herein by reference and are included in reliance upon the reports
of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of AP Southeast Portfolio Partners, L.P. for the
period from its date of inception (November 17, 1993) through December 31, 1993
incorporated herein by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A
dated April 29, 1996 as amended on June 3, 1996 and June 18, 1996, have been so
included in reliance on the reports of Price Waterhouse LLP, independent
accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Securities offered hereby is being passed upon for the
Company and the Operating Partnership by Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P.,
Raleigh, North Carolina. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for any
underwriters, dealers or agents by Andrews & Kurth L.L.P., Washington, D.C.
In addition, the description of Federal income tax consequences contained
in this Prospectus entitled "Federal Income Tax Considerations" is based upon
the opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P.
Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. and Andrews & Kurth L.L.P. will rely as
to matters of Maryland law on the opinion of Piper & Marbury L.L.P., Baltimore,
Maryland.
46
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
<S> <C>
Audited Financial Statements -- Highwoods/Forsyth Limited Partnership
Report of Independent Auditors............................................................................. F-2
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 1996 (unaudited) and December 31, 1995 and 1994............................. F-3
Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 1996 and 1995 (unaudited), the year ended
December 31, 1995 and for the period June 14, 1994 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 1994..... F-4
Statements of Partners' Capital for the three months ended March 31, 1996 (unaudited), the year ended
December 31, 1995 and for the period June 14, 1994 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 1994..... F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 1996 and 1995 (unaudited), the year ended
December 31, 1995 and for the period June 14, 1994 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 1994..... F-6
Notes to Financial Statements.............................................................................. F-8
Schedule III -- Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation................................................... F-18
Combined Financial Statements -- Highwoods Group (Predecessor)
Report of Independent Auditors............................................................................. F-24
Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1993............................................................. F-25
Combined Statements of Operations for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the year
ended December 31, 1993.................................................................................. F-26
Combined Statements of Owners' Deficit for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the
year ended December 31, 1993............................................................................. F-27
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the year
ended December 31, 1993.................................................................................. F-28
Notes to Combined Financial Statements..................................................................... F-29
Schedule III -- Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation................................................... F-33
Other Information
Selected Financial Data.................................................................................... F-35
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations...................... F-36
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
TO THE OWNERS
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Highwoods/Forsyth
Limited Partnership as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related statements
of income, partners' capital, and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1995 and for the period from June 14, 1994 (commencement of operations) to
December 31, 1994. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
listed in the Index. These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the management of Highwoods/Forsyth Limited Partnership. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and schedule
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Highwoods/Forsyth Limited
Partnership at December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the results of its operations and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for the period from June 14,
1994 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 1994 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
February 2, 1996,
except note 8 as to which the date is
April 29, 1996
F-2
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, December 31,
1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(unaudited)
Assets
Real estate assets, at cost:
Land..................................................................... $ 110,672 $106,955 $ 34,484
Buildings and improvements............................................... 495,117 491,581 183,572
Development in process................................................... 20,856 15,508 643
Furniture, fixtures and equipment........................................ 1,408 1,288 967
628,053 615,332 219,666
Less -- accumulated depreciation......................................... (25,777) (22,266) (11,690)
Net real estate assets................................................... 602,276 593,066 207,976
Cash and cash equivalents.................................................. 8,383 6,838 6,258
Accounts and notes receivable.............................................. 6,545 6,338 496
Notes receivable from service subsidiaries................................. 1,316 1,274 620
Accrued straight line rents receivable..................................... 3,807 3,407 1,888
Other assets:
Deferred leasing costs................................................... 4,625 4,253 2,139
Deferred financing costs and interest rate caps.......................... 8,417 8,268 6,796
Prepaid expenses and other............................................... 1,698 1,521 330
14,740 14,042 9,265
Less -- accumulated amortization......................................... (4,423) (3,831) (1,726)
10,317 10,211 7,539
$ 632,644 $621,134 $224,777
Liabilities and partners' capital
Mortgages and notes payable................................................ 196,718 $182,736 $ 66,864
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities................... 9,977 11,052 5,717
Total liabilities..................................................... 206,695 193,788 72,581
Redeemable operating partnership units outstanding, 3,732,452 at
March 31, 1996 and 3,732,412 and 1,054,664 at December 31, 1995
and 1994, respectively................................................... 104,061 105,401 21,884
Partners' capital:
General partner units outstanding, 231,401 at March 31, 1996 and 231,368
and 100,409 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively............... 3,219 3,219 1,303
Limited partner units outstanding, 19,176,200 at March 31, 1996 and
19,174,455 and 8,885,781 at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.......................................................... 318,669 318,726 129,009
Total partners' capital............................................... 321,888 321,945 130,312
$ 632,644 $621,134 $224,777
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
Three months ended Year Ended June 14, to
March 31, December 31, December 31,
1996 1995 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(unaudited)
Revenue:
Rental income............................................. $23,385 $12,693 $ 71,217 $ 19,011
Equity in earnings of service companies................... -- -- -- 100
Interest and other income................................. 372 153 2,305 331
Total revenue............................................... 23,757 12,846 73,522 19,442
Operating expenses:
Rental property........................................... 6,154 3,053 17,049 5,110
Depreciation and amortization............................. 3,716 1,921 11,082 2,607
Interest expense:
Contractual............................................ 3,542 2,066 12,101 2,482
Amortization of deferred financing costs and interest
rate cap............................................. 409 404 1,619 738
3,951 2,470 13,720 3,220
General and administrative................................ 934 523 2,737 810
Income before extraordinary item....................... 9,002 4,879 28,934 7,695
Extraordinary item -- loss on early extinguishment of
debt................................................... -- (1,068) (1,068) (1,422)
Net income.................................................. $ 9,002 $ 3,811 $ 27,866 $ 6,273
Net income per unit:
Income before extraordinary item.......................... $ 0.39 $ 0.36 $ 1.55 $ 0.77
Extraordinary item -- loss on early extinguishment of
debt................................................... -- (0.08) (.06) (0.14)
Net income................................................ $ 0.39 $ 0.28 $ 1.49 $ 0.63
Weighted average units outstanding........................ 23,139 13,418 18,697 9,991
Net income per unit:
General partner........................................... $ 0.39 $ 0.28 $ 1.49 $ 0.63
Limited partners.......................................... $ 0.39 $ 0.28 1.49 0.63
Weighted average units outstanding:
General partner........................................... 231 134 187 100
Limited partner........................................... 22,908 13,284 18,510 9,891
Total....................................................... 23,139 13,418 18,697 9,991
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Statements of Partners' Capital
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
General Limited Total
Partner's Partners' Partners'
Capital Capital Capital
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Initial capital contribution June 14, 1994................................... $ 1 $ -- $ 1
Offering proceeds............................................................ 1,874 162,539 164,413
Basis adjustments and acquisition of limited partners' interest.............. -- (13,471) (13,471)
Net income................................................................... 63 6,210 6,273
Distributions................................................................ (50) (4,970) (5,020)
Transfer of redeemable operating partnership units and adjustment to
fair market value.......................................................... (219) (21,665) (21,884)
Transfer of limited partners' interest....................................... (366) 366 --
Balance at December 31, 1994................................................. 1,303 129,009 130,312
Offering proceeds............................................................ -- 219,821 219,821
Capital contributions........................................................ -- 57,308 57,308
Net income................................................................... 278 27,588 27,866
Distributions................................................................ (299) (29,546) (29,845)
Transfer of redeemable operating partnership units and adjustment to
fair market value.......................................................... (835) (82,682) (83,517)
Transfer of limited partners' interest....................................... 2,772 (2,772) --
Balance at December 31, 1995................................................. 3,219 318,726 321,945
Net income (unaudited)....................................................... 90 8,912 9,002
Distributions (unaudited).................................................... (104) (10,295) (10,399)
Transfer of redeemable operating partnership units and adjustment to
fair market value (unaudited).............................................. 14 1,326 1,340
Balance at March 31, 1996 (unaudited)........................................ $3,219 $ 318,669 $ 321,888
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
Three months ended Year Ended June 14 to
March 31, December 31, December 31,
1996 1995 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(unaudited)
Operating activities:
Net income.............................................. $ 9,002 $ 3,811 $ 27,866 $ 6,273
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization......................... 4,125 2,325 12,701 3,345
Loss on early extinguishment of debt.................. 1,068 1,422
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable................................ (207) (483) (1,561) (321)
Prepaid expenses and other assets.................. -- (116) (173) (521)
Accrued straight line rents receivable............. (400) (267) (1,519) (503)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
liabilities...................................... (1,075) (398) 4,787 3,455
Net cash provided by operating activities........ 11,445 4,872 43,169 13,150
Investing activities:
Proceeds from disposition of real estate assets......... 900 -- 2,200 --
Additions to real estate assets......................... (13,643) (23,839) (130,411) (99,208)
Other assets and notes receivable....................... (591) (622) (1,777) (620)
Cash from contributed net assets........................ -- 549 549 2,088
Cash paid in exchange for partnership net assets........ -- (5,793) (6,593) (9,623)
Net cash used in investing activities.............. (13,334) (29,705) (136,032) (107,363)
Financing activities:
Distributions paid...................................... (10,399) (4,267) (29,845) (5,020)
Net proceeds from contributed capital................... -- 109,689 219,821 164,413
Payment of prepayment penalties and loan costs.......... (1,046) (1,025)
Borrowings on credit facility........................... 15,000 41,000 50,800 62,700
Repayment of credit facility............................ -- -- (87,000) (20,000)
Proceeds from mortgages and notes payable............... -- -- 90,250 --
Repayment of mortgages.................................. (1,018) (120,137) (148,907) (93,947)
Payment of deferred financing costs..................... (149) (289) (630) (6,650)
Net cash provided by financing activities.......... 3,434 25,996 93,443 100,471
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents............... 1,545 1,163 580 6,258
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period.... 6,838 6,258 6,258 --
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period.......... $ 8,383 $ 7,421 $ 6,838 $ 6,258
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest.................................. $ 4,005 $ 1,795 $ 11,965 $ 2,073
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Statements of Cash Flows -- Continued
(In thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, 1995 and
for the Period from June 14, 1994 (commencement of operations) to December 31,
1994
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities
The following summarizes the net assets contributed by the Unit holders of
the Operating Partnership or assets acquired subject to mortgages and notes
payable:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
<S> <C> <C>
Assets:
Real estate assets, net................................................................... $260,883 $51,614
Cash and cash equivalents................................................................. 549 2,088
Deferred rent receivable.................................................................. -- 1,385
Tenant leasing costs, net................................................................. -- 1,188
Deferred financing costs, net............................................................. 842 488
Accounts receivable and other............................................................. 6,290 174
Total assets............................................................................ 268,564 56,937
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable......................................................................... 210,728 63,947
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities.................................. 549 2,262
Total liabilities....................................................................... 211,277 66,209
Net assets (liabilities)............................................................. $ 57,287 $(9,272)
In connection with the above transactions, the Operating Partnership made additional cash
payments to certain partners in exchange for their partnership net assets in the amounts
of $9,623,000 in 1994 and $6,593,000 in 1995. These transactions were accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting. Further, in connection with these transactions, the
Company received cash payments at closing of $2,088,000 in 1994 and $549,000 in 1995 to
fund the payment of certain accrued liabilities such as property taxes.
Additionally, in connection with the formation of the Operating Partnership additional
debt of $54,164,000 was assumed and Units valued at $4,199,000 were issued during the
period from June 14, 1994 to December 31, 1994.
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1995
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and Formation of the Company
Highwoods/Forsyth Limited Partership (the "Operating Partnership" formerly
Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership), commenced operations on June 14, 1994
when Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the "Company") completed an initial public
offering (the "Initial Public Offering") and issued 7.4 million shares of Common
Stock (plus 1.1 million shares subsequently issued pursuant to the underwriters'
over-allotment option). As of March 31, 1996, the Operating Partnership owned
191 properties consisting of 94 suburban office buildings and 97 industrial
properties.
The following transactions (the "Formation Transactions") occurred in
connection with the Initial Public Offering:
(Bullet) The Company consummated various purchase agreements to acquire
certain interests in 41 properties, including 27 properties which
were not owned by the predecessor to the Company and the Operating
Partnership (the "Highwoods Group") prior to the Initial Public
Offering.
For the 14 properties previously owned by the Highwoods Group,
negative net assets of approximately $9,272,000 were contributed
to the Operating Partnership at their historical cost.
Approximately $8,400,000 was distributed to non-continuing
partners of the Highwoods Group for their partnership interest in
the 14 properties. For the 27 properties not owned by the
Highwoods Group, the Company issued approximately $4,200,000 of
Units, assumed $54,164,000 of debt and paid $82,129,000 in cash.
These 27 properties were recorded at their purchase price using
the purchase method of accounting.
(Bullet) The Company became the sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership, by contributing its ownership interests in the 41
properties and its third-party fee business and all but
$10,400,000 of the net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering in
exchange for an approximate 88.3% interest in the Operating
Partnership.
(Bullet) The Operating Partnership executed various option and purchase
agreements whereby it paid approximately $81,352,000 in cash,
issued 1,054,664 redeemable units in the Operating Partnership
("Units") and assumed approximately $118,111,000 of indebtedness
in exchange for fee simple interests in the 41 properties and
the development land.
(Bullet) The Operating Partnership contributed the third-party management
and development business and the third-party leasing business to
Highwoods Services, Inc. (formerly Highwoods Realty Services, Inc.
and Highwoods Leasing Company) in exchange for 100% of each
company's non-voting common stock and 1% of their voting common
stock.
As a result of common stock offerings and subsequent contributions of
capital to the Operating Partnership by the Company, the Company owns
approximately 84% of the Units in the Operating Partnership as of December 31,
1995 (including its 1% general partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership). These units are classified as General Partners' Capital and
Limited Partners's Capital in the accompanying Statements of Partners' Capital.
The Company's capital accounts are adjusted to reflect the 1% general
partnership interest with the adjustments at book value presented as transfer
of "limited partners' interest" in the Statements of Partners' Capital.
Generally one year after issuance (the "lock-up period"), the Operating
Partnership is obligated to redeem each Redeemable Operating Partnership Unit
at the request of the holder thereof for cash, provided that the Company at its
option may elect to acquire any such Unit presented for redemption by
exchanging one share of Common Stock for the Unit or cash at the fair market
value. When a Unit holder redeems a Unit for a share of Common Stock or cash,
the minority interest will be reduced and the Company's share in the Operating
F-8
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- Continued
Partnership will be increased. The Company's General and Limited Partnership
Units are not redeemable for cash. At December 31, 1995, the one-year lock-up
period had expired with respect to 1,054,664 of the 3,732,412 Units issued.
As of the date hereof, the Operating Partnership owns 95 suburban offices
buildings, 104 industrial and service center properties and 221 acres of land
for future development in the southeastern United States.
Basis of Presentation
The Operating Partnership's investments in Highwoods Services, Inc. and
Forsyth Properties Services, Inc. (the "Service Companies") are accounted for
using the equity method of accounting. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the financial statements.
The extraordinary loss represents the write-off of loan origination fees
and prepayment penalties paid on the early extinguishment of debt.
Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. All
capitalizable costs related to the improvement or replacement of commercial real
estate properties are capitalized. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line
method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings and improvements
and 5 to 7 years for furniture and equipment. Tenant improvements are amortized
over the life of the respective leases, using the straight-line method.
The Company reviews each property for any evidence of possible impairment
of carrying value based on estimated future cash flows. Based on their analysis,
as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 the carrying value of all properties is below
their estimated net realizable values.
In March 1995, the FASB issued Statement No. 121, Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of, which
requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in
operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash
flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets'
carrying amount. Statement 121 also addresses the accounting for long-lived
assets that are expected to be disposed of. The Company adopted the Statement in
the first quarter of 1996 and the adoption did not have any material effect.
Cash Equivalents
The Operating Partnership considers highly liquid investments with a
maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition
Minimum rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term
of the lease. Unpaid rents are included in accounts receivable. Certain lease
agreements contain provisions which provide reimbursement of real estate taxes,
insurance, advertising and certain common area maintenance (CAM) costs. These
additional rents are recorded on the accrual basis. All rent and other
receivables from tenants are due from commercial building tenants located in the
properties.
Deferred Lease Fees and Loan Costs
Lease fees, concessions and loan costs are capitalized at cost and
amortized over the life of the related lease or loan term, respectively.
F-9
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- Continued
Redeemable Operating Partnership Units
Holders of redeemable operating partnership units may request redemption
of each of their units by the Operating Partnership for cash equal to the
fair market value of one share of the Company's Common Stock at any time
after expiration of the applicable "lock-up" period. The Company, the
general partner of the Operating Partnership, may, at its option, choose
to satisfy the redemption requirements by issuing Common Stock on a one-for-one
basis for the number of units submitted for redemption. In accordance with
ASR 268, these units are classified outside of permanent partners' capital
in the accompanying balance sheet. The recorded value of these units is
based on fair value at the balance sheet date and measured by the closing
price of the Company's Common Stock in that date multiplied by the total
number of units outstanding.
Income Taxes
No provision has been made for income taxes in the accompanying financial
statements because such taxes, if any, are the responsibility of the individual
partners.
The Operating Partnership's taxable income for the year ended December 31,
1995, and for the period from June 14, 1994 to December 31, 1994 was $22,258,500
and $5,100,800, respectively. The differences between book income and taxable
income primarily result from timing differences consisting of depreciation
expense ($2,788,000 and $979,480 in 1995 and 1994, respectively) and recording
of rental income ($1,115,390 and $335,780 in 1995 and 1994, respectively).
Concentration of Credit Risk
Management of the Operating Partnership performs ongoing credit evaluations
of its tenants. At December 31, 1995, the properties were leased to
approximately 950 tenants, in four geographic locations, which engage in a wide
variety of businesses. There is no dependence upon any single tenant.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The Operating Partnership enters into various interest rate swaps and caps
in managing its interest rate risk. Payments to or from the counterparties are
recorded as adjustments to interest expense. The Company has designated these
instruments as hedges against existing liabilities and accordingly utilizes
hedge accounting.
The Operating Partnership would not realize a material loss as of December
31, 1995 in the event of non-performance by any one counterparty. The Operating
Partnership has entered into transactions with financial institution
counterparties with a credit rating of Aa3 or better. Additionally, the
Operating Partnership limits the amount of credit exposure with any one
institution.
Interim Unaudited Financial Information
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have
been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosure normally
included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles may have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The
unaudited consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 1996 and for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 1996 and 1995 include, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to present fairly the financial information set forth herein. The
results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for the entire year.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-10
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
2. MORTGAGES AND NOTES PAYABLE
Mortgages and notes payable consisted of the following at December 31, 1995
and 1994 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
<S> <C> <C>
Conventional fixed rate mortgages payable (a.).................... $134,687 $24,164
Variable rate mortgages payable (b.).............................. 36,549 --
9% fixed rate unsecured note payable.............................. 5,000 --
Revolving credit facility (c.).................................... 6,500 42,700
Total........................................................... $182,736 $66,864
</TABLE>
(a.) Conventional fixed rate mortgages payable includes 19 loans at
December 31, 1995, and seven loans at December 31, 1994. The loans were secured
by real estate assets with an aggregate undepreciated cost of approximately
$226,000,000 at December 31, 1995. Interest rates on fixed rate mortgages
payable range from 7.0% to 13.0% with a weighted average rate of 8.80% at
December 31, 1995.
(b.) Variable rate mortgages payable includes three loans at December 31,
1995. The loans were secured by real estate assets with an aggregate
undepreciated cost of approximately $75,000,000 at December 31, 1995. Interest
rates on variable rate mortgages payable range from 1.35% to 1.50% above the
30-day London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"). At December 31, 1995, 30-day
LIBOR was 5.9%.
The Operating Partnership has entered into two interest rate swap
agreements with financial institutions to effectively fix the interest rates on
the variable rate mortgages payable at a rate of 7.24%. At December 31, 1995,
the notional amounts of the interest rate swaps equaled the outstanding balance
of the mortgages payable. The swaps expire in June 1999 and July 2000 upon the
maturity of the respective mortgage agreements. The cost basis of the interest
rate swaps was $670,000 at December 31, 1995.
(c.) The Operating Partnership has a revolving credit facility in the
amount of $80,000,000 from two participating banks. The credit facility bears
interest at 1.50% above 30-day LIBOR and matures on June 13, 1999. See
"Subsequent Events" in note 8. The terms of the credit facility require the
Operating Partnership to pay a commitment fee equal to .25% on the unused
portion of the credit facility and include certain restrictive covenants which
limit, among other things, dividend payments and additional indebtedness and
which requires compliance with certain financial ratios and measurements. At
December 31, 1995, the Operating Partnership was in compliance with the terms of
the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by real estate assets with
an aggregate undepreciated cost of approximately $133,000,000 at December 31,
1995.
To limit increases in interest expense due to changes in 30-day LIBOR, the
Operating Partnership used $6,170,000 of the proceeds from the Initial Public
Offering to purchase a five-year, $80,000,000 interest rate protection
agreement. The interest rate protection agreement limits the Operating
Partnership's exposure to 30-day LIBOR of 5.5% (7.0% with the 1.50% spread). The
initial premium paid to acquire the interest rate protection agreement is being
amortized as an increase to interest expense over the five-year term of the
agreement. Payments received from the counterparties under the interest rate
protection agreements were $385,000 in 1995 and $25,000 in 1994; and were
recorded in the contractual interest expense in the income statement. At
December 31, 1995, the effective interest rate on the credit facility was 7%.
(d.) The aggregate maturities of the mortgages and notes payable are as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1996.................................................. $ 4,137
1997.................................................. 25,135
1998.................................................. 7,301
1999.................................................. 38,719
2000.................................................. 39,084
Thereafter............................................ 68,360
$182,736
</TABLE>
F-11
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
2. MORTGAGES AND NOTES PAYABLE -- Continued
During 1995 and 1994, the total interest costs incurred on mortgages and
notes payable was $12,608,000 and $2,499,000, respectively. The amount of
interest capitalized during 1995 and 1994 was $507,000 and $17,000,
respectively.
3. RENTAL INCOME
The Operating Partnership's real estate assets are leased to tenants under
operating leases that expire over the next ten years. The minimum rental amounts
under the leases are generally either subject to scheduled fixed increases or
adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index. Generally, the leases also
require that the tenants reimburse the Operating Partnership for increases in
certain costs above their base year costs.
Expected future minimum rents to be received over the next five years and
thereafter from tenants for leases in effect at December 31, 1995, are as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1996.......................................................................... $ 81,765
1997.......................................................................... 66,760
1998.......................................................................... 50,863
1999.......................................................................... 39,594
2000.......................................................................... 27,134
Thereafter.................................................................... 28,685
$294,801
</TABLE>
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Operating Partnership makes advances to Highwoods Services, Inc. and
Forsyth Properties Services, Inc. for working capital purposes. These advances
bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum and totaled $1,274,000 at December 31,
1995, and $620,000 at December 31, 1994. The Operating Partnership recorded
interest income from these advances of $43,000 and $15,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1995, and for the period from June 14, 1994, to December 31, 1994.
During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Operating Partnership acquired
two properties encompassing 99,334 square feet at an aggregate purchase price of
$6,850,000 from partnerships in which certain officers and directors owned a
majority interest. These transactions were accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting and their operating results are included in the Statements
of Income from their acquisition dates.
F-12
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease:
Two of the properties located in Parkway Plaza development are subject to a
land lease expiring December 31, 2082. Rental payments are to be adjusted yearly
based on the consumer price index. The Operating Partnership has the option to
purchase the leased land during the lease term at the greater of 85% of
appraised value or $35,000 per acre. The obligation for future minimum lease
payments is as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1996................................................................ $ 97
1997................................................................ 97
1998................................................................ 97
1999................................................................ 97
2000................................................................ 97
Thereafter.......................................................... 7,981
$8,466
</TABLE>
Litigation:
The Operating Partnership is a party to a variety of legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of its business. These matters are generally
covered by insurance. All of these matters, taken together, are not expected to
have a material adverse effect on the accompanying consolidated financial
statements not withstanding possible insurance recovery.
Contracts:
The Operating Partnership has entered into construction contracts totaling
$39,173,000 at December 31, 1995. The amounts remaining on these contracts as of
December 31, 1995, totaled $26,548,000.
The Operating Partnership has entered into a contract under which it is
committed to acquire 64 acres of land over a five-year period for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $10,172,000. The seller has the option to elect
to receive the purchase price in either cash or Units valued at $26.67.
The Operating Partnership has also entered into a contract under which it
is committed to acquire 18 acres of land on or before August 1, 1998, for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $2,032,000.
Environmental Matters:
All but one of the Operating Partnership properties have been subjected to
Phase I environmental reviews. Such reviews have not revealed, nor is management
aware of, any environmental liability that management believes would have a
material adverse effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
F-13
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
6. DISCLOSURE ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following disclosures of estimated fair values were determined by
management using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and
develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are
not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Operating Partnership could
realize upon disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different
market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on
the estimated fair value. The carrying amounts and estimated fair value of the
Operating Partnership's financial instruments at December 31, 1995, were as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Carrying Fair
Amount Value
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents............................ $ 6,838 $ 6,838
Accounts and notes receivable........................ $ 7,612 $ 7,612
Mortgages and notes payable.......................... $182,735 $186,709
Interest rate swap agreements........................ $ 670 (464)
Interest rate cap.................................... $ 4,267 1,311
</TABLE>
The fair values for the Operating Partnership's fixed rate mortgages and
notes payable were estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the
Operating Partnership's estimated incremental borrowing rate at December 31,
1995, for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amounts of the
Operating Partnership's variable rate borrowings approximate fair value.
The fair values of the Operating Partnership's interest rate swap and
interest rate cap agreements represent the estimated amount the Operating
Partnership would receive or pay to terminate or replace the financial
instruments at current market rates.
Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on
relevant information available to the Operating Partnership at December 31,
1995. Although management is not aware of any factors that would have a material
effect on the fair value amounts reported herein, such amounts have not been
revalued since that date and current estimates of fair value may significantly
differ from the amounts presented.
7. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Through mergers and acquisitions during 1995, the Operating Partnership
increased its portfolio of office and industrial space by 6,357,000 square feet
at an aggregate cost of $369,900,000. Additionally, during 1995 the Company
completed its second and third public offerings of common stock. These
transactions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
their operating results are included in the Statements of Income from their
acquisition dates.
During 1994, the Company completed its Initial Public Offering, the
Formation Transactions and acquired 207,000 square feet of office and industrial
space at an aggregate cost of $15,000,000.
Unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31,
1995 and 1994 are set forth below. For 1995, such pro forma results assume (i)
the acquisition of 5,727,706 square feet of office and industrial space at a
total cost of $354,200,000 and (ii) the second and third public offerings and
the related capital contributions occurred at the beginning of the year. For
1994, such pro forma results assume (i) the 1994 acquisition of 5,727,706 square
feet of office and industrial space at a total cost of $354,200,000, and (ii)
the initial, second and third offerings, the related capital contributions, and
the Formation Transactions occurred at the beginning of the year. The proceeds
from the second and third offerings were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness
and for working capital purposes. Pro forma interest expense was calculated
based upon the indebtedness outstanding after debt repayment and using the
effective rate on such indebtedness. In 1994 and 1995, 200,000 and 2,677,748,
respectively, of Operating Partnership units were issued in connection with
various mergers and acquisitions. These units were recorded at the market value
of the Company's Common Stock price on the closing date of the transactions.
F-14
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
7. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS -- Continued
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pro Forma Year Ended Pro Forma Year Ended
December 31, 1995 December 31, 1994
<S> <C> <C>
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Revenues..................... $ 90,592 $ 83,541
Net Income................... $ 35,607 $ 28,771
Net Income per Unit.......... $ 1.54 $ 1.25
</TABLE>
The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the
Operating Partnership's results of operations would have been if the
transactions had occurred at the beginning of each period presented.
Additionally, the pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the
Operating Partnership's results of operations for future periods.
8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Credit Facility
On March 26, 1996, the Operating Partnership closed on a $140,000,000
unsecured credit facility (the "New Credit Facility") which replaces the
existing $80 million line. At March 31, 1996, $21,500,000 was outstanding under
the credit facility. The New Credit Facility is with three commercial banks and
has an initial interest rate of LIBOR +1.50% which will adjust based on the
Operating Partnership's senior unsecured credit rating to a range of LIBOR
+1.00% to LIBOR +1.75%. The Company will continue to utilize the $80,000,000
interest rate protection agreement to limit its exposure to increases in 30-day
LIBOR.
Nashville Transaction
On April 1, 1996, the Company and the Operating Partnership completed a
merger with Eakin & Smith and its affiliates ("Eakin & Smith") combining their
property portfolios, management teams and business operations. The merger will
be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Through the
combination, the Company succeeded to the ownership of seven suburban office
buildings totaling 848,000 square feet, a 103,000-square-foot suburban office
development project, 18 acres of development land and Eakin & Smith's brokerage
and property management operations. All the properties and development land are
located in Nashville, Tennessee. At March 31, 1996, the properties acquired in
the transaction were 97% leased.
The aggregate purchase price, assuming the completion of the in-process
development project, was approximately $98.5 million payable through the
issuance of 537,138 limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership and
489,421 shares of Common Stock, the assumption of $37 million of indebtedness
(with a weighted average fixed rate of 8.0%), and cash payments of approximately
$33 million. The aggregate purchase price excludes deferred payments of up to
54,056 shares of Common Stock, which are attributable to Eakin & Smith's
brokerage and property management operation. A total payment of 13,514 shares of
Common Stock will be paid to the three principals of Eakin & Smith, Inc. for
each of the first four 12-month periods following the combination in which
third-party service revenue attributable to the Eakin & Smith brokerage and
property management operations exceeds $2,000,000.
As part of the combination, the three principals of Eakin & Smith, Inc.
received options to purchase 105,000 shares of common stock at $27.50 per share.
Such options vest in four equal annual installments beginning with the second
anniversary of the date of grant. Such principals also received warrants to
purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock for $28.00 per share.
Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty Trust, Inc.
On April 29, 1996, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Crocker Realty
Trust, Inc. ("Crocker"). Under the terms of the
F-15
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS -- Continued
Merger Agreement, Cedar Acquisition Corporation ("Cedar"), a newly formed
subsidiary of the Company, will merge into Crocker with the Company becoming the
sole shareholder of Crocker. The Company intends to contribute the shares of
common stock of Crocker to the Operating Partnership in exchange for limited
partnership interests therein. As a result, Crocker would become a subsidiary of
the Operating Partnership. As a result of the Merger, the Operating Partnership
will acquire 58 suburban office properties and 12 service center properties (the
"Crocker Properties") located in 15 Southeastern markets in Florida, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia and Alabama. The Crocker
Properties encompass 5.7 million rentable square feet and, at March 31, 1996,
were 95% leased.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company will acquire all of
the outstanding capital stock of Crocker in exchange for a cash payment of
$11.02 per share, subject to certain adjustments. Based on Crocker's 26,981,087
shares of outstanding capital stock at May 31, 1996, the purchase price will
total approximately $297 million. In addition, the Company will cash out certain
existing options and warrants to purchase Crocker common stock for an estimated
$4.2 million and assume approximately $240 million of Crocker's currently
outstanding indebtedness, having a weighted average interest rate of 8.6%. In
connection with the Merger, the Company has also entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with AP CRTI Holdings, L. P. (an
affiliate of Apollo Real Estate Advisors), AEW Partners, L.P. (an investment
partnership advised by Aldrich Eastman Waltch), and Crocker's three senior
executives (Thomas J. Crocker, Richard S. Ackerman and Robert E. Onisko), who
together own approximately 83% of Crocker's outstanding common stock
(collectively, the "Crocker Selling Shareholders"), which obligates such
shareholders to sell their shares to the Company at a cash price of $11.02,
subject to the same adjustments as required under the Merger Agreement. The
approximately $247 million purchase price of such shares is part of the total
approximately $297 million purchase price for all of Crocker's outstanding
shares. The Merger Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement may be terminated
by the respective parties only in certain limited circumstances. In addition,
under the terms of the Merger Agreement, certain specified assets and
liabilities of Crocker will not be acquired by the Company.
In connection with the Merger, the Company obtained a commitment from
NationsBank and First Union National Bank of North Carolina for a $250 million
revolving line of credit (the "Revolving Loan"). The Revolving Loan will replace
the Credit Facility and will be used together with the proceeds from the
Offering to fund the Merger.
The Revolving Loan will be unsecured for the first nine months and will
bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 150 basis points. After the initial
nine-month period, the Revolving Loan will either convert to a secured loan with
a maturity date two years from its closing date or to an unsecured loan maturing
on July 31, 1999. The Revolving Loan will remain unsecured if the Company
generates at least $300 million of net proceeds from equity offerings (including
the proceeds from this Offering) during the initial nine-month period and meets
certain covenants, including covenants relating to debt ratios, tangible net
worth and interest coverage.
If the Revolving Loan remains unsecured after the initial nine-month
period, it would have an interest rate that ranged from LIBOR plus 100 basis
points to LIBOR plus 175 basis points based on the Company's senior unsecured
credit rating. If the loan converts to a secured facility, the Company will be
required to pledge assets at least equal in value to 60% of the outstanding
amount of the Revolving Loan and the interest rate will equal LIBOR plus 175
basis points.
F-16
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
9. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
Selected quarterly financial data for the year ended December 31, 1995, and
for the period from June 14, 1994, (commencement of operations) to December 31,
1994, is as follows (in thousands except per unit amounts):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the period from June 14, 1994 to December 31, 1994*
First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues............................ $ -- $ 1,482 $ 8,810 $ 9,150 $19,442
Income before extraordinary item.... -- 534 3,652 3,509 7,695
Extraordinary item.................. -- (1,422) -- -- (1,422)
Net (loss) income................... $ -- $ (888) $ 3,652 $ 3,509 $ 6,273
Per Unit:
Income before extraordinary
item........................... $ -- $ 0.06 $ 0.36 $ 0.35 $ 0.77
Net (loss) income................. $ -- $ (0.09) $ 0.36 $ 0.35 $ 0.63
<CAPTION>
For the year ended December 31, 1995*
First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues............................ $12,846 $ 17,518 $20,560 $ 22,598 $73,522
Income before extraordinary item.... 4,879 6,829 7,939 9,287 28,934
Extraordinary item.................. (1,068) -- -- -- (1,068)
Net income.......................... $ 3,811 $ 6,829 $ 7,939 $ 9,287 $27,866
Per Unit:
Income before extraordinary
item........................... $ 0.36 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 $ 0.40 $ 1.55
Net income........................ $ 0.29 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 $ 0.40 $ 1.49
</TABLE>
* The total of the four quarterly amounts for net income per unit do not equal
the total for the year due to the use of a weighted average to compute the
average number of units outstanding.
F-17
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SCHEDULE III -- REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 1995
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost Gross Amount at
Capitalized Which Carried at
Initial Cost Subsequent Close of Period
Building & to Building & Accumulated
Description Encumbrance Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation (1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Highwoods Office Center
Amica (2) $ 289 $ 1,544 $ 42 $ 289 $ 1,586 $ 1,875 $ 61
Arrowwood -- 955 3,406 212 955 3,618 4,573 139
Aspen (2) 560 2,104 56 560 2,160 2,720 91
Birchwood (2) 201 911 -- 201 911 1,112 43
Cedar East (2) 563 2,498 58 563 2,556 3,119 106
Cedar West (2) 563 2,487 94 563 2,581 3,144 101
Cottonwood (2) 609 3,253 15 609 3,268 3,877 127
Cypress (2) 567 1,747 26 567 1,773 2,340 84
Dogwood $ 2,633 766 2,790 -- 766 2,790 3,556 108
Hawthorn (2) 904 3,782 -- 904 3,782 4,686 1,487
Highwoods Tower (2) 203 16,948 -- 203 16,948 17,151 2,035
Holly -- 300 1,170 -- 300 1,170 1,470 45
Ironwood (2) 319 1,276 99 319 1,375 1,694 82
Kaiser (2) 133 3,625 -- 133 3,625 3,758 978
Laurel (2) 884 2,537 4 884 2,541 3,425 98
Leatherwood -- 213 851 98 213 949 1,162 52
Smoketree Tower (2) 2,353 11,922 723 2,353 12,645 14,998 475
Rexwoods Office Center
2500 Blue Ridge (2) 722 4,552 33 722 4,585 5,307 177
Blue Ridge II 1,445 434 -- 1,450 462 1,422 1,884 333
Rexwoods Center (3) 775 -- 3,771 878 3,668 4,546 648
Rexwoods II (2) 355 -- 1,822 362 1,815 2,177 100
Rexwoods III 3,320 886 -- 2,863 919 2,830 3,749 328
Rexwoods IV (2) 586 -- 3,434 586 3,434 4,020 58
Triangle Business Center
Bldg. 2A (3) 377 4,004 303 377 4,307 4,684 193
Bldg. 2B (3) 118 1,225 -- 118 1,225 1,343 47
Bldg. 3 (3) 409 5,349 300 409 5,649 6,058 290
Bldg. 7 (3) 414 6,301 (72) 414 6,229 6,643 240
Progress Center
Cape Fear -- 131 -- 1,895 131 1,895 2,026 928
Catawba -- 125 -- 1,650 125 1,650 1,775 912
CompuChem -- 269 -- 6,598 289 6,578 6,867 1,726
North Park
4800 North Park 10,847 2,678 17,673 109 2,678 17,782 20,460 689
4900 North Park 1,567 770 1,989 11 770 2,000 2,770 77
5000 North Park (2) 1,010 4,697 560 1,010 5,257 6,267 203
Creekstone Park
Creekstone Crossing -- 728 3,891 16 728 3,907 4,635 61
Riverbirch (2) 448 -- 4,137 469 4,116 4,585 813
Willow Oak -- 458 4,685 343 458 5,028 5,486 21
Research Commons
EPA Annex/
Administration (4) 1,609 10,920 51 1,609 10,971 12,580 390
4501 Bldg. (4) 748 4,448 653 748 5,101 5,849 184
4401 Bldg. (4) 1,822 8,929 3,575 1,822 12,504 14,326 554
4301 Bldg. (4) 1,094 7,425 -- 1,094 7,425 8,519 132
4201 Bldg. (4) 1,466 7,715 2,305 1,466 10,020 11,486 417
Hock Portfollo
Fairfield I -- 805 3,227 21 805 3,248 4,053 37
<CAPTION>
Date of Date
Description Construction Acquired
<S> <C> <C>
Highwoods Office Center
Amica 1983 1994
Arrowwood 1979 1994
Aspen 1980 1994
Birchwood 1983 1994
Cedar East 1981 1994
Cedar West 1981 1994
Cottonwood 1983 1994
Cypress 1980 1994
Dogwood 1983 1994
Hawthorn 1987 1994
Highwoods Tower 1991 1994
Holly 1984 1994
Ironwood 1978 1994
Kaiser 1988 1994
Laurel 1982 1994
Leatherwood 1979 1994
Smoketree Tower 1984 1994
Rexwoods Office Center
2500 Blue Ridge 1982 1994
Blue Ridge II 1988 1994
Rexwoods Center 1990 1994
Rexwoods II 1993 1994
Rexwoods III 1992 1994
Rexwoods IV 1994 1994
Triangle Business Center
Bldg. 2A 1984 1994
Bldg. 2B 1984 1994
Bldg. 3 1988 1994
Bldg. 7 1988 1994
Progress Center
Cape Fear 1980 1994
Catawba 1980 1994
CompuChem 1980 1994
North Park
4800 North Park 1985 1994
4900 North Park 1984 1994
5000 North Park 1980 1994
Creekstone Park
Creekstone Crossing 1990 1995
Riverbirch 1987 1994
Willow Oak 1995 1995
Research Commons
EPA Annex/
Administration 1966 1995
4501 Bldg. 1985 1995
4401 Bldg. 1987 1995
4301 Bldg. 1989 1995
4201 Bldg. 1991 1995
Hock Portfollo
Fairfield I 1987 1995
</TABLE>
F-18
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost Gross Amount at Which
Capitalized Carried at Close of
Initial Cost Subsequent Period
Building & to Building & Accumulated
Description Encumbrance Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation (1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fairfield II $ -- $ 910 $ 3,647 $ 19 $ 910 $ 3,666 $ 4,576 $ 42
Qualex -- 879 3,522 -- 879 3,522 4,401 40
4101 Roxboro -- 1,059 4,243 10 1,059 4,253 5,312 49
4020 Roxboro -- 675 2,708 8 675 2,716 3,391 31
Other Research Triangle
Properties
Colony Corporate Center (2) 613 3,296 62 613 3,358 3,971 134
Concourse (2) 986 12,069 185 986 12,254 13,240 477
Cotton Building -- 460 1,844 -- 460 1,844 2,304 2
Expressway One Warehouse 1,650 242 -- 1,836 246 1,832 2,078 248
Holiday Inn 2,464 867 2,748 75 867 2,823 3,690 106
Lake Plaza East (2) 856 4,893 126 856 5,019 5,875 217
Phoenix -- 394 2,019 11 394 2,030 2,424 53
Six Forks Center I -- 666 2,688 -- 666 2,688 3,354 8
Six Forks Center II -- 1,086 4,370 8 1,086 4,378 5,464 14
Six Forks Center III -- 862 4,444 91 862 4,535 5,397 144
South Square I (3) 606 3,785 152 606 3,937 4,543 157
South Square II (2) 525 4,742 106 525 4,848 5,373 187
Airpark East
Highland Industries (5) 175 699 -- 175 699 874 15
Service Center 1 (5) 275 1,099 46 275 1,145 1,420 24
Service Center 2 (5) 222 889 -- 222 889 1,111 19
Service Center 3 (5) 304 1,214 -- 304 1,214 1,518 27
Service Center 4 (5) 224 898 -- 224 898 1,122 20
Copier Consultants (5) 252 1,008 -- 252 1,008 1,260 22
Service Court (5) 194 774 1 194 775 969 17
Bldg. 01 (5) 377 1,510 8 377 1,518 1,895 34
Bldg. 02 (5) 461 1,842 1 461 1,843 2,304 40
Bldg. 03 (5) 321 1,283 41 321 1,324 1,645 33
Bldg. A (5) 541 2,913 60 541 2,973 3,514 66
Bldg. B (5) 779 3,200 43 779 3,243 4,022 73
Bldg. C (5) 2,384 9,535 35 2,384 9,570 11,954 214
Sears Cenfact 4,561 861 3,446 6 861 3,452 4,313 75
Warehouse 1 (5) 384 1,535 -- 384 1,535 1,919 34
Warehouse 2 (5) 372 1,488 -- 372 1,488 1,860 33
Warehouse 3 (5) 370 1,480 2 370 1,482 1,852 32
Warehouse 4 (5) 657 2,628 1 657 2,629 3,286 57
Airpark North
DC-1 (5) 723 2,891 15 723 2,906 3,629 64
DC-2 (5) 1,094 4,375 42 1,094 4,417 5,511 97
DC-3 (5) 378 1,511 -- 378 1,511 1,889 33
DC-4 (5) 377 1,508 1 377 1,509 1,886 33
Airpark West
Airpark I (3) 954 3,817 5 954 3,822 4,776 84
Airpark II (3) 887 3,536 7 887 3,543 4,430 79
Airpark IV (3) 226 903 37 226 940 1,166 22
Airpark V (3) 242 966 6 242 972 1,214 22
Airpark VI (3) 326 1,308 61 326 1,369 1,695 34
West Point Business Park
BMF Warehouse (6) 795 3,181 -- 795 3,181 3,976 70
WP-11 (6) 393 1,570 22 393 1,592 1,985 35
WP-12 (6) 382 1,531 22 382 1,553 1,935 34
WP-13 (6) 297 1,192 22 297 1,214 1,511 27
WP-3 & 4 (6) 120 480 -- 120 480 600 11
WP-5 -- 178 590 136 178 726 904 5
Fairchild Bldg. (6) 640 2,577 -- 640 2,577 3,217 56
LUWA Bahnson Bldg. (6) 346 1,384 1 346 1,385 1,731 30
<CAPTION>
Date of Date
Description Construction Acquired
<S> <C> <C>
Fairfield II 1989 1995
Qualex 1985 1995
4101 Roxboro 1984 1995
4020 Roxboro 1989 1995
Other Research Triangle
Properties
Colony Corporate Center 1985 1994
Concourse 1986 1994
Cotton Building 1972 1995
Expressway One Warehouse 1990 1994
Holiday Inn 1984 1994
Lake Plaza East 1984 1994
Phoenix 1990 1994
Six Forks Center I 1982 1995
Six Forks Center II 1983 1995
Six Forks Center III 1987 1994
South Square I 1988 1994
South Square II 1989 1994
Airpark East
Highland Industries 1990 1995
Service Center 1 1985 1995
Service Center 2 1985 1995
Service Center 3 1985 1995
Service Center 4 1985 1995
Copier Consultants 1990 1995
Service Court 1990 1995
Bldg. 01 1990 1995
Bldg. 02 1986 1995
Bldg. 03 1986 1995
Bldg. A 1986 1995
Bldg. B 1988 1995
Bldg. C 1990 1995
Sears Cenfact 1989 1995
Warehouse 1 1985 1995
Warehouse 2 1985 1995
Warehouse 3 1986 1995
Warehouse 4 1988 1995
Airpark North
DC-1 1986 1995
DC-2 1987 1995
DC-3 1988 1995
DC-4 1988 1995
Airpark West
Airpark I 1984 1995
Airpark II 1985 1995
Airpark IV 1985 1995
Airpark V 1985 1995
Airpark VI 1985 1995
West Point Business Park
BMF Warehouse 1986 1995
WP-11 1988 1995
WP-12 1988 1995
WP-13 1988 1995
WP-3 & 4 1988 1995
WP-5 1995 1995
Fairchild Bldg. 1990 1995
LUWA Bahnson Bldg. 1990 1995
</TABLE>
F-19
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost Gross Amount at Which
Capitalized Carried at Close of
Initial Cost Subsequent Period
Building & to Building & Accumulated
Description Encumbrance Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation (1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
University Commercial
Center
W-1 $ -- $ 203 $ 812 $ -- $ 203 $ 812 $ 1,015 $ 18
W-2 -- 196 786 -- 196 786 982 17
SR-1 -- 276 1,155 6 276 1,161 1,437 26
SR-2 01/02 -- 215 859 90 215 949 1,164 26
SR-3 -- 167 668 -- 167 668 835 15
Bldg. 01/02 -- 26 102 13 26 115 141 3
Bldg. 03 -- 429 1,771 3 429 1,774 2,203 39
Bldg. 04 -- 514 2,058 6 514 2,064 2,578 46
Ivy Distribution Center -- 452 1,812 67 452 1,879 2,331 42
Knollwood Office Center
370 Knollwood (5) 1,819 7,451 444 1,819 7,895 9,714 192
380 Knollwood (5) 2,977 11,912 163 2,977 12,075 15,052 272
Stoneleigh Business Park
7327 W. Friendly Ave. -- 60 441 6 60 447 507 5
7339 W. Friendly Ave. -- 63 465 8 63 473 536 6
7341 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 113 831 11 113 842 955 10
7343 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 72 531 7 72 538 610 6
7345 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 66 485 6 66 491 557 6
7347 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 97 709 9 97 718 815 8
7349 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 53 388 5 53 393 446 4
7351 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 106 778 11 106 789 895 9
7353 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 123 901 12 123 913 1,036 10
7355 W. Friendly Ave. (7) 72 525 7 72 532 604 6
Spring Garden Plaza
4000 Spring Garden St. -- 127 933 7 127 940 1,067 11
4002 Spring Garden St. -- 39 290 2 39 292 331 3
4004 Spring Garden St. -- 139 1,019 8 139 1,027 1,166 12
Pomona Center-Phase I
7 Dundas Circle (7) 75 552 -- 75 552 627 6
8 Dundas Circle (7) 84 617 -- 84 617 701 7
9 Dundas Circle (7) 51 373 -- 51 373 424 4
Pomona Center-Phase II
302 Pomona Dr. (7) 84 617 -- 84 617 701 7
304 Pomona Dr. (7) 22 163 -- 22 163 185 2
306 Pomona Dr. (7) 50 368 -- 50 368 418 4
308 Pomona Dr. (7) 72 531 -- 72 531 603 6
5 Dundas Circle (7) 72 531 -- 72 531 603 6
Westgate on Wendover-Phase
I
305 South Westgate Dr. (8) 30 220 1 30 221 251 3
307 South Westgate Dr. (8) 66 485 4 66 489 555 6
309 South Westgate Dr. (8) 68 496 3 68 499 567 6
311 South Westgate Dr. (8) 75 551 4 75 555 630 6
315 South Westgate Dr. (8) 54 396 2 54 398 452 5
317 South Westgate Dr. (8) 81 597 3 81 600 681 7
319 South Westgate Dr. (8) 54 396 2 54 398 452 5
Westgate on Wendover-Phase
II
206 South Westgate Dr. (7) 91 664 4 91 668 759 8
207 South Westgate Dr. (7) 138 1,012 6 138 1,018 1,156 12
300 South Westgate Dr. (7) 68 496 3 68 499 567 6
4600 Dundas Circle (7) 62 456 19 62 475 537 5
4602 Dundas Circle (7) 68 498 -- 68 498 566 6
Radar Road
500 Radar Rd. (7) 202 1,484 -- 202 1,484 1,686 17
502 Radar Rd. (7) 39 285 -- 39 285 324 3
<CAPTION>
Date of Date
Description Construction Acquired
<S> <C> <C>
University Commercial
Center
W-1 1983 1995
W-2 1983 1995
SR-1 1983 1995
SR-2 01/02 1983 1995
SR-3 1984 1995
Bldg. 01/02 1983 1995
Bldg. 03 1985 1995
Bldg. 04 1986 1995
1930-
Ivy Distribution Center 1980 1995
Knollwood Office Center
370 Knollwood 1994 1995
380 Knollwood 1990 1995
Stoneleigh Business Park
7327 W. Friendly Ave. 1987 1995
7339 W. Friendly Ave. 1989 1995
7341 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
7343 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
7345 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
7347 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
7349 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
7351 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
7353 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
7355 W. Friendly Ave. 1988 1995
Spring Garden Plaza
4000 Spring Garden St. 1983 1995
4002 Spring Garden St. 1983 1995
4004 Spring Garden St. 1983 1995
Pomona Center-Phase I
7 Dundas Circle 1986 1995
8 Dundas Circle 1986 1995
9 Dundas Circle 1986 1995
Pomona Center-Phase II
302 Pomona Dr. 1987 1995
304 Pomona Dr. 1987 1995
306 Pomona Dr. 1987 1995
308 Pomona Dr. 1987 1995
5 Dundas Circle 1987 1995
Westgate on Wendover-Phase
I
305 South Westgate Dr. 1985 1995
307 South Westgate Dr. 1985 1995
309 South Westgate Dr. 1985 1995
311 South Westgate Dr. 1985 1995
315 South Westgate Dr. 1985 1995
317 South Westgate Dr. 1985 1995
319 South Westgate Dr. 1985 1995
Westgate on Wendover-Phase
II
206 South Westgate Dr. 1986 1995
207 South Westgate Dr. 1986 1995
300 South Westgate Dr. 1986 1995
4600 Dundas Circle 1985 1995
4602 Dundas Circle 1985 1995
Radar Road
500 Radar Rd. 1981 1995
502 Radar Rd. 1986 1995
</TABLE>
F-20
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost Gross Amount at Which
Capitalized Carried at Close of
Initial Cost Subsequent Period
Building & to Building & Accumulated
Description Encumbrance Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation (1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
504 Radar Rd. (7) $ 39 $ 285 $ -- $ 39 $ 285 $ 324 $ 3
506 Radar Rd. (7) 39 285 -- 39 285 324 3
Holden/85 Business Park
2616 Phoenix Dr. (7) 135 990 -- 135 990 1,125 11
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 100 (7) 63 466 -- 63 466 529 5
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 200 (7) 63 466 -- 63 466 529 5
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 300 (7) 31 229 -- 31 229 260 3
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 400 (7) 52 382 2 52 384 436 5
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 500 (7) 64 471 5 64 476 540 6
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 600 (7) 78 575 -- 78 575 653 7
Industrial Village
7906 Industrial Village
Rd. (7) 62 455 5 62 460 522 5
7908 Industrial Village (7) 62 455 5 62 460 522 5
7910 Industrial Village
Rd. (7) 62 455 5 62 460 522 5
Other Piedmont Triad
Properties
6348 Burnt Poplar $ -- 721 2,883 7 721 2,890 3,611 63
6350 Burnt Poplar -- 339 1,365 5 339 1,370 1,709 30
Stratford (2) 2,777 11,459 -- 2,777 11,459 14,236 252
Chesapeake (3) 1,236 4,944 -- 1,236 4,944 6,180 108
3288 Robinhood 1,172 290 1,159 24 290 1,183 1,473 28
Steele Creek Park
Bldg. A (3) 499 1,998 7 499 2,005 2,504 44
Bldg. B (3) 110 441 -- 110 441 551 10
Bldg. E (3) 188 824 85 188 909 1,097 16
Bldg. G-1 (3) 196 783 20 196 803 999 18
Bldg. H (3) 169 677 72 169 749 918 30
Bldg. K (3) 148 592 -- 148 592 740 13
Bldg. N (3) 199 722 -- 199 722 921 17
Highwoods/Forsyth Business
Park
4101 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 70 510 2 70 512 582 6
4105 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 26 189 1 26 190 216 2
4109 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 87 636 4 87 640 727 7
4201 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 110 809 4 110 813 923 9
4205 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 134 979 8 134 987 1,121 11
4209 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 91 665 3 91 668 759 8
4215 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 133 978 9 133 987 1,120 11
4301 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 232 1,702 11 232 1,713 1,945 20
4321 Stuart Andrew Blvd. (7) 73 534 3 73 537 610 6
Parkway Plaza
Building 1 -- 1,110 4,741 -- 1,110 4,741 5,851 4
Building 2 -- 1,694 6,777 -- 1,694 6,777 8,471 5
Building 3 -- 1,570 6,282 -- 1,570 6,282 7,852 5
Building 7 -- -- 4,648 -- -- 4,648 4,648 4
Building 8 -- -- 4,698 -- -- 4,698 4,698 4
Building 9 4,865 -- 6,008 -- -- 6,008 6,008 5
Other Charlotte Properties
First Citizens (2) 647 5,528 30 647 5,558 6,205 218
<CAPTION>
Date of Date
Description Construction Acquired
<S> <C> <C>
504 Radar Rd. 1986 1995
506 Radar Rd. 1986 1995
Holden/85 Business Park
2616 Phoenix Dr. 1985 1995
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 100 1989 1995
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 200 1989 1995
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 300 1989 1995
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 400 1989 1995
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 500 1989 1995
2606 Phoenix Dr. -- 600 1989 1995
Industrial Village
7906 Industrial Village
Rd. 1985 1995
7908 Industrial Village 1985 1995
7910 Industrial Village
Rd. 1985 1995
Other Piedmont Triad
Properties
6348 Burnt Poplar 1990 1995
6350 Burnt Poplar 1992 1995
Stratford 1991 1995
Chesapeake 1993 1995
3288 Robinhood 1989 1995
Steele Creek Park
Bldg. A 1989 1995
Bldg. B 1985 1995
Bldg. E 1985 1995
Bldg. G-1 1989 1995
Bldg. H 1987 1995
Bldg. K 1985 1995
Bldg. N 1989 1995
Highwoods/Forsyth Business
Park
4101 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1984 1995
4105 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1984 1995
4109 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1984 1995
4201 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1982 1995
4205 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1982 1995
4209 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1982 1995
4215 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1982 1995
4301 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1982 1995
4321 Stuart Andrew Blvd. 1982 1995
Parkway Plaza
Building 1 1982 1995
Building 2 1983 1995
Building 3 1984 1995
Building 7 1985 1995
Building 8 1986 1995
Building 9 1984 1995
Other Charlotte Properties
First Citizens 1989 1994
</TABLE>
F-21
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost Gross Amount at Which
Capitalized Carried at Close of
Initial Cost Subsequent Period
Building & to Building & Accumulated
Description Encumbrance Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation (1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Innsbrook Office Center
Markel American (9) $ 585 $ 2,347 $ 81 $ 585 $ 2,428 $ 3,013 $ 34
Proctor-Silex (9) 1,086 4,344 -- 1,086 4,344 5,430 50
Vantage Place I $ -- 235 940 1 235 941 1,176 7
Vantage Place II -- 203 811 2 203 813 1,016 6
Vantage Place III -- 218 873 2 218 875 1,093 6
Vantage Place IV -- 233 931 2 233 933 1,166 7
Vantage Point 4,493 1,089 4,354 51 1,089 4,405 5,494 32
Innsbrook Tech I 1,181 264 1,058 -- 264 1,058 1,322 8
DEQ Technology Center -- 541 2,166 -- 541 2,166 2,707 11
DEQ Office -- 1,324 5,305 -- 1,324 5,305 6,629 28
Technology Park
Virginia Center -- 1,438 5,858 -- 1,438 5,858 7,296 157
Development Projects
Global Software -- 465 -- 58 465 58 523 --
MSA -- 717 -- 9 717 9 726 --
Healthsource -- 1,294 -- 1 1,294 1 1,295 --
Highwoods Health Club -- 142 555 -- 142 555 697 --
Regency One -- 554 -- -- 554 -- 554 --
Development Land
Capital Center -- 851 -- -- 851 -- 851 --
Creekstone Park -- 1,255 -- (453) 10) 802 -- 802 --
Highwoods Office Center
North -- 1,555 49 (450) 11) 1,105 49 1,154 10
Highwoods Office Center
South -- 2,518 -- -- 2,518 -- 2,518 --
Research Commons -- 1,349 -- -- 1,349 -- 1,349 --
Airpark East -- 1,932 -- -- 1.932 -- 1,932 --
Airpark North -- 804 -- -- 804 -- 804 --
NationsFord Business
Park -- 1,206 -- -- 1,206 -- 1,206 --
West Point Business Park -- 1,759 -- -- 1,759 -- 1,759 --
Airport Center Drive 1,600 1,600 -- -- 1,600 -- 1,600 --
$41,798 $ 107,642 $449,766 $ 41,128 $ 106,955 $491,581 $598,536 12) $21,452
<CAPTION>
Date of Date
Description Construction Acquired
<S> <C> <C>
Innsbrook Office Center
Markel American 1988 1995
Proctor-Silex 1986 1995
Vantage Place I 1987 1995
Vantage Place II 1987 1995
Vantage Place III 1988 1995
Vantage Place IV 1988 1995
Vantage Point 1990 1995
Innsbrook Tech I 1991 1995
DEQ Technology Center 1991 1995
DEQ Office 1991 1995
Technology Park
Virginia Center 1985 1994
Development Projects
Global Software N/A
MSA N/A N/A
Healthsource N/A N/A
Highwoods Health Club N/A N/A
Regency One N/A N/A
Development Land
Capital Center N/A 1995
Creekstone Park N/A 1994
Highwoods Office Center
North N/A 1994
Highwoods Office Center
South N/A 1994
Research Commons N/A 1995
Airpark East N/A 1995
Airpark North N/A 1995
NationsFord Business
Park N/A 1995
West Point Business Park N/A 1995
Airport Center Drive N/A 1995
N/A N/A
</TABLE>
(1) Depreciation is computed using economic lives ranging from 5 to 40 years.
(2) These assets are pledged as collateral for an $80,000,000 credit facility.
(3) These assets are pledged as collateral for a $31,834,000 first mortgage
loan.
(4) These assets are pledged as collateral for a $24,481,000 first mortgage
loan.
(5) These assets are pledged as collateral for a $40,659,000 first mortgage
loan.
(6) These assets are pledged as collateral for an $8,733,000 first mortgage
loan.
(7) These assets are pledged as collateral for a $12,067,000 first mortgage
loan.
(8) These assets are pledged as collateral for a $6,669,000 first mortgage loan.
(9) These assets are pledged as collateral for a $4,995,000 first mortgage loan.
(10) Reflects land transferred to the Willow Oak Property.
(11) Reflects land transferred to the Global Property.
(12) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes was approximately
$509,000,000.
F-22
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTE TO SCHEDULE III
(in thousands)
As of December 31, 1995 and 1994
A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1995 1994
<S> <C> <C>
Real Estate:
Balance at beginning of year........................................................ $ 218,699 $ 61,656
Additions:
Acquisitions and development..................................................... 365,130 154,946
Improvements..................................................................... 16,806 2,097
Cost of real estate sold............................................................ (2,099) --
Balance at close of year (a).......................................................... $ 598,536 $218,699
Accumulated Depreciation:
Balance at beginning of year........................................................ $ 11,003 $ 8,679
Depreciation expense................................................................ 10,483 2,324
Real estate sold.................................................................... (34) --
Balance at close of year (b)........................................................ $ 21,452 $ 11,003
</TABLE>
(a) Reconciliation of total cost to balance sheet caption at December 31, 1995
and 1994 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
<S> <C> <C>
Total per schedule III $598,536 $218,699
Construction in progress exclusive
of land of $3,172 included in
Schedule III 15,508 --
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 1,288 967
Total real estate assets at cost $615,332 $219,666
</TABLE>
(b) Reconciliation of total accumulated depreciation to balance sheet caption at
December 31, 1995 and 1994 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
<S> <C> <C>
Total per schedule III $21,452 $11,003
Accumulated depreciation -- furniture, fixtures and equipment 814 687
Total accumulated depreciation $22,266 $11,690
</TABLE>
F-23
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of the Highwoods
Group as of December 31, 1993, and the related combined statements of
operations, owners' deficit, and cash flows for the period from January 1, 1994
to June 13, 1994 and for the year ended December 31, 1993. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index. These financial
statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Highwoods Group's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the combined financial position of the Highwoods Group
at December 31, 1993, and the combined results of operations and cash flows for
the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the year ended December
31, 1993 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
January 10, 1995
F-24
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1993
<S> <C>
Assets
Rental properties, at cost:
Land........................................................................................ $ 9,488,616
Buildings and improvements.................................................................. 50,141,219
Equipment................................................................................... 924,782
60,554,617
Less accumulated depreciation............................................................... (8,649,712)
Rental property, net..................................................................... 51,904,905
Cash and cash equivalents..................................................................... 865,647
Restricted cash............................................................................... 928,773
Rents and other receivables from tenants (net of allowance of $20,000 in
December 1993).............................................................................. 1,314,983
Accounts receivable from related parties...................................................... 156,942
Accrued straight line rents receivable........................................................ 1,624,535
Deferred offering costs and prepaids.......................................................... 180,604
Other assets:
Deferred lease fees and loan costs.......................................................... 2,838,182
Less accumulated amortization............................................................... (1,136,059)
1,702,123
Total assets.................................................................................. $58,678,512
Liabilities and owners' deficit
Mortgages and notes payable including $159,362 to related parties at
December 31, 1993........................................................................... $64,346,580
Accrued expenses and accounts payable......................................................... 2,226,879
Accounts payable to related parties........................................................... 81,833
Total liabilities............................................................................. 66,655,292
Owners' deficit............................................................................... (7,976,780)
Commitments (Notes 3 and 6)...................................................................
Total liabilities and owners' deficit......................................................... $58,678,512
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-25
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
January 1, 1994
to Year ended
June 13, 1994 December 31, 1993
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Rental income................................................................ $ 4,953,444 $ 8,983,623
Leasing, development and construction income................................. 1,267,725 3,721,407
Other income................................................................. 427,300 745,173
Total revenue.................................................................. 6,648,469 13,450,203
Expenses:
Property operating expenses.................................................. 2,246,830 4,398,186
Leasing, development and construction expenses............................... 349,677 1,849,778
Interest..................................................................... 2,472,609 5,184,781
Depreciation and amortization................................................ 834,622 1,583,314
Marketing, general and administrative........................................ 280,777 589,257
Total expenses................................................................. 6,184,515 13,605,316
Net income (loss).............................................................. $ 463,954 $ (155,113)
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-26
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OWNERS' DEFICIT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Owners'
Deficit
<S> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1992....................................................................... (7,823,410)
Owners' distributions............................................................................ (1,043,944)
Owners' contributions............................................................................ 1,045,687
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1993.................................................... (155,113)
Balance at December 31, 1993....................................................................... (7,976,780)
Owners' distributions............................................................................ (1,759,220)
Net income for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994.................................. 463,954
Balance at June 13, 1994........................................................................... $(9,272,046)
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-27
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
January 1, 1994
to Year ended
June 13, 1994 December 31, 1993
<S> <C> <C>
Operating activities
Net income (loss).............................................................. $ 463,954 $ (155,113)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization................................................ 834,622 1,583,314
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Rents and other receivables from tenants................................... 1,100,324 (608,301)
Deferred lease fees and loan costs......................................... 26,150 (332,458)
Accounts receivable from related parties................................... -- 42,620
Deferred offering costs and prepaids....................................... 181,303 (155,055)
Tenant security deposits................................................... 7,682 (5,660)
Accrued straight line rents receivable..................................... 238,707 (267,102)
Accrued expenses and accounts payable...................................... (53,828) 1,198,327
Accounts payable to related parties........................................ -- (115,914)
Net cash provided by operating activities...................................... 2,798,914 1,184,658
Investing activities
Changes in restricted cash..................................................... 834,717 (466,228)
Purchases of, and improvements to, rental properties........................... (346,978) (6,284,966)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities............................ 487,739 (6,751,194)
Financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings....................................................... -- 4,918,424
Principal payments on notes payable............................................ (398,724) (851,188)
Distributions to partners...................................................... (1,759,220) (1,043,944)
Capital contributions from partners............................................ -- 1,045,687
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities............................ (2,157,944) 4,068,979
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents........................... 1,128,709 (1,497,557)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year................................. 865,647 2,363,204
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year....................................... $ 1,994,356 $ 865,647
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the year for interest (net of interest capitalized of $-0- and
$15,772, for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the
year ended December 31, 1993, respectively).................................. $ 2,410,237 $ 5,098,233
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-28
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
The predecessor to Highwoods Properties, Inc. ("the Company") and
Highwoods/Forsyth Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") (the
"Highwoods Group") was engaged in the ownership, management, operation, leasing
and development of commercial real estate properties. The Highwoods Group owned
and operated 14 buildings located in the Research Triangle Park region of North
Carolina.
Principles of Combination
The Highwoods Group was not a legal entity but rather a combination of
commercial real estate properties that were organized as general partnerships
and were under common control, and an affiliated real estate management company,
the Highwoods Properties Company ("HPC"). HPC provided property management
services to the properties. All significant intercompany transactions and
balances were eliminated in the combination.
As discussed in Note 6, on June 14, 1994, the Highwoods Group transferred
its properties and property management operation to the Operating Partnership.
Rental Property
Rental properties were recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. All
capitalizable costs related to the improvement or replacement of commercial real
estate properties were capitalized. Depreciation was computed by the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings
and improvements and five to seven years for furniture and equipment. Tenant
improvements were amortized over the life of the respective leases, using the
straight-line method.
Cash Equivalents
The Highwoods Group considered highly liquid investments with a maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition
Minimum rental income was recognized on a straight-line basis over the term
of the lease, and due and unpaid rents were included in rents and other
receivables from tenants in the accompanying balance sheet. Certain lease
agreements contained provisions which provide reimbursement of real estate
taxes, insurance and certain common area maintenance (CAM) costs. These
additional rents were recorded on the accrual basis. All rent and other
receivables from tenants were due from commercial building tenants located in
the properties. Lease fee income was recognized 50% when the lease was signed
and 50% when the tenant commenced occupancy.
Deferred Lease Fees and Loan Costs
Lease fees and concessions and loan costs were capitalized at cost and
amortized over the life of the related lease or loan.
Other Income
Other income consisted primarily of management fees generated by HPC from
providing property management services to third parties and interest income.
Income Taxes
No provision was made for income taxes because the commercial real estate
properties were owned by partnerships whose partners were required to include
their respective share of profits or losses in their individual tax returns.
F-29
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- Continued
HPC elected to be taxed for Federal and state income tax purposes as an
S-Corporation under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Consequently
income, losses and credits were passed through directly to the shareholders,
rather than taxed at the corporate level. This election was effective as of
January 1, 1993.
2. MORTGAGES AND NOTES PAYABLE
Mortgages Payable
Conventional mortgages payable were comprised of 20 loans at December 31,
1993, each of which was collateralized by a building and related land included
in real estate assets. The mortgages payable were generally due in monthly
installments of interest and principal and matured at various dates through
2011. Interest rates on fixed rate mortgages payable aggregating $41,138,812 at
December 31, 1993 ranged from 7% to 9.875% (averaging 8.77% at December 31,
1993). Interest rates on variable rate mortgages payable aggregating $22,720,011
at December 31, 1993 ranged from the prime rate (6.0% at December 31, 1993) to
1.5% above the prime rate.
Unsecured Notes Payable
Unsecured notes payable were comprised of four loans at December 31, 1993.
The notes payable were generally due in monthly installments of interest and
principal and mature at various dates through 2000. Interest rates on fixed rate
notes payable aggregating $328,395 at December 31, 1993 ranged from 6% to 11%
(averaging 8.31% at December 31, 1993). Interest rates on variable rate notes
payable aggregating $159,362 (of which all is due to related parties) at
December 31, 1993 ranged from the prime rate (6.0% at December 31, 1993) to 1.5%
above the prime rate.
Combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and notes payable at
December 31, 1993 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1994...................................................................... $18,435,354
1995...................................................................... 1,132,936
1996...................................................................... 782,363
1997...................................................................... 846,760
1998...................................................................... 8,350,738
Thereafter................................................................ 34,798,429
$64,346,580
</TABLE>
All of the properties were pledged as collateral for the mortgages payable.
In connection with the procurement of mortgages on completed buildings, the
lenders required a holdback of a portion of the loan proceeds to provide for
tenant fit-ups in the buildings. These proceeds were then drawn as fit-up
expenses are incurred. Such hold back amounts are included in restricted cash in
the consolidated balance sheet. (1993 -- $928,773).
F-30
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
3. LEASES
The Highwoods Group leased automobiles, and office space under various
operating leases. Total rent expense for these leases was $69,900 and $148,000
for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the year ended
December 31, 1993, respectively.
4. MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PROGRAM
In 1989, HPC adopted two bonus plans for four members of management. The
first plan provided for approximately 15.5% of the net income of HPC for each
fiscal year to be divided among the managers, based on performance, and paid in
the first quarter following the end of the fiscal year. The second plan provided
that 25% of all profits of HPC in excess of $700,000 for each fiscal year be
contributed to a pool for the same four members of management, based on
established percentages. Amounts contributed under the plan were paid to the
employees ratably over a three-year period. These bonuses were discretionary and
approved by the partners annually. Compensation expense related to the bonus
plan was $212,060 for the year ended December 31, 1993. There was no expense
incurred for the period from January 1, through June 13, 1994.
5. RENTAL INCOME
The Highwoods Group's developed property is being leased to tenants under
operating leases that expire over the next ten years. The minimum rental amounts
under the leases are either subject to scheduled fixed increases or adjustments
based on the Consumer Price Index. Generally, the leases also require that the
tenants reimburse the Highwoods Group for increases in certain costs above their
base year costs.
Expected future minimum rents to be received over the next five years and
thereafter from related party and other tenants for leases in effect at December
31, 1993 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Related Other
Party Tenants Total
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1994................................................................. $ 78,589 $ 9,371,140 $ 9,449,729
1995................................................................. 78,589 8,943,983 9,022,572
1996................................................................. 78,589 7,684,132 7,762,721
1997................................................................. 6,549 6,223,503 6,230,052
1998................................................................. -- 5,149,191 5,149,191
Thereafter........................................................... -- 10,335,729 10,335,729
$242,316 $47,707,678 $47,949,994
</TABLE>
Two major tenants represented 11% and 10% of the Highwoods Group's total
rental income for the year ended December 31, 1993.
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
There were several business relationships with related parties which
involved management, leasing and maintenance fees for buildings, as well as
advancing money in the ordinary course of business to other entities whose
principal owners were partners in HPC. Total fees received from related parties
for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the year ended
December 31, 1993 were $10,989 and $494,000, respectively.
Other related party transactions included (i) leasing fees paid to an
affiliated business of $2,267 and $12,100, for the period from January 1, 1994
to June 13, 1994 and during 1993, respectively, (ii) partners' management fees
of $-0- for the period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and $30,000 in 1993
and (iii) rent paid to an affiliated business of $9,900 and $34,000 for the
period from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and in 1993, respectively.
F-31
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS -- Continued
The amount of land purchased from related parties for the year ended
December 31, 1993 was $142,284.
7. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On June 14, 1994, the Highwoods Group transferred all of its assets and
liabilities to the Operating Partnership in connection with the Company's
initial public offering of common stock.
F-32
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
SCHEDULE III -- REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 1993
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost Capitalized Gross Amount at Which
Subsequent to Carried at Close of
Initial Cost Acquisition Period
Buildings & Buildings & Buildings &
Description Encumbrance Land Improvements Land Improvements Land Improvements Total (A)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Blue Ridge
II $ 1,686,036 $ 433,556 -- -- $ 1,323,291 $ 433,556 $ 1,323,291 $ 1,756,847
Cape
Fear/Catawba 3,010,488 256,322 -- -- 3,258,258 256,322 3,258,258 3,514,580
CompuChem 7,220,423 268,866 -- -- 6,097,552 268,866 6,097,552 6,366,418
Expressway
One 1,794,970 241,583 -- -- 1,724,973 241,583 1,724,973 1,966,556
Hawthorn 5,035,976 904,437 -- -- 3,767,097 904,437 3,767,097 4,671,534
Highwoods
North 1,851,720 1,554,732 -- -- 48,892 1,554,732 48,892 1,603,624
Highwoods
South 4,057,240 2,746,136 -- $(249,225) -- 2,496,911 -- 2,496,911
Highwoods
Tower 17,000,000 203,419 -- -- 16,574,375 203,419 16,574,375 16,777,794
Ironwood/
Leatherwood 2,802,433 531,609 $2,126,435 -- 68,611 531,609 2,195,046 2,726,655
Kaiser 5,035,976 133,126 -- -- 3,564,301 133,126 3,564,301 3,697,427
Rexwoods II 1,599,416 354,735 -- -- 1,773,567 354,735 1,773,567 2,128,302
Rexwoods III 3,572,377 885,598 -- -- 2,709,598 885,598 2,709,598 3,595,196
Rexwoods
Center 4,452,026 775,408 -- -- 3,243,234 775,408 3,243,234 4,018,642
Riverbirch 4,739,742 448,314 -- -- 3,861,035 448,314 3,861,035 4,309,349
$63,858,823 $ 9,737,841 $2,126,435 $(249,225) $48,014,784 $ 9,488,616 $50,141,219 $ 59,629,835
<CAPTION>
Life on
Which
Accumulated Date of Depreciation
Description Depreciation Construction is Computed
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Blue Ridge
II $ 262,871 1988 5-40 yrs.
Cape
Fear/Catawba 1,660,012 1980 5-40 yrs.
CompuChem 1,402,874 1980 5-40 yrs.
Expressway
One 156,031 1990 5-40 yrs.
Hawthorn 1,298,151 1987 5-40 yrs.
Highwoods
North 7,566 1983 5-40 yrs.
Highwoods
South -- 1983 N/A
Highwoods
Tower 1,181,907 1991 5-40 yrs.
Ironwood/
Leatherwood 8,355 (B) 5-40 yrs.
Kaiser 798,539 1988 5-40 yrs.
Rexwoods II 9,615 1993 5-40 yrs.
Rexwoods III 188,277 1992 5-40 yrs.
Rexwoods
Center 468,538 1990 5-40 yrs.
Riverbirch 597,156 1987 5-40 yrs.
$8,039,892
</TABLE>
(A) The aggregate cost for Federal Income Tax purposes was approximately
$59,629,835.
(B) The property was acquired in 1993.
F-33
<PAGE>
HIGHWOODS GROUP
SCHEDULE III -- REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (CONTINUED)
June 13, 1994
The changes in the Highwoods Group for the period from January 1, 1994 to
June 13, 1994 and for the year ended December 31, 1993 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
January 1, 1994 to
June 13, 1994 1993
<S> <C> <C>
Real estate balance at beginning of period.................................... $ 59,629,835 $ 53,478,294
Properties developed (1)...................................................... -- 2,128,302
Properties acquired........................................................... -- 2,658,044
Improvements.................................................................. 2,025,410 1,365,195
Disposals..................................................................... -- --
Balance at end of period...................................................... $ 61,655,245 $ 59,629,835
</TABLE>
(1) Land was acquired from related parties for $142,284 in 1993.
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the period from January 1, 1994
to June 13, 1994 and for the year ended December 31, 1993 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
January 1, 1994 to
June 13, 1994 1993
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period................................................. $8,039,892 $ 6,852,176
Depreciation for period...................................................... 639,541 1,187,716
Disposals.................................................................... -- --
Balance at end of period....................................................... $8,679,433 $ 8,039,892
</TABLE>
F-34
<PAGE>
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating information
for the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, for the year
ended December 31, 1995, and for the period from June 14, 1994 (commencement of
operations) to December 31, 1994. The following table also sets forth selected
financial and operating information on a historical basis for the Highwoods
Group (the predecessor to the Operating Partnership) as of and for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1993, and for the period from
January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994.
Due to the impact of the initial formation of the Operating Partnership and
the initial public offering in 1994, the second and third offerings in 1995 and
the transactions more fully described in "Management's Discussion and
Analysis -- Overview and Background," the historical results of operations for
the years ended December 31, 1991, 1992, 1993 and 1994 will not be comparable to
the current results of operations.
The Operating Partnership and the Highwoods Group
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Operating Partnership
Highwoods Group
Three Months Year Ended June 14, 1994 January 1,
Ended March 31, December 31, to December 31, 1994 to June 13 Year Ended December 31,
1996 1995 1995 1994 1994 1993 1992 1991
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Operating Data:
Total revenues..... $ 23,757 12,846 $ 73,522 $ 19,442 $ 6,648 $13,450 $12,532 $ 9,774
Rental property
operating
expenses......... 6,154(1) 3,053(1) 17,049(1) 5,110(1) 2,596(2) 6,248(2) 5,587(2) 4,467(2)
General and
administrative... 934 523 2,737 810 280 589 694 690
Interest expense... 3,951 2,470 13,720 3,220 2,473 5,185 5,059 3,908
Depreciation and
amortization..... 3,716 1,921 11,082 2,607 835 1,583 1,431 1,135
Income (loss)
before
extraordinary
item............. 9,002 4,879 28,934 7,695 464 (155) (239) (426)
Extraordinary item-
loss on
retirement of
debt............. -- 1,068 1,068 1,422 -- -- -- --
Net income
(loss)........... 9,002 3,811 27,866 6,273 464 (155) (239) (426)
Net income per
unit:
General
partner........ 0.39 0.28 1.49 0.63 -- -- -- --
Limited
partners....... 0.39 0.28 1.49 0.63 -- -- -- --
Weighted average
units
outstanding:
General
partner........ 231 134 187 100 -- -- -- --
Limited
partners....... 22,908 13,284 18,510 9,891 -- -- -- --
Total.............. 23,139 13,418 18,697 9,991 -- -- -- --
Balance Sheet Data:
Rental properties
net of
accumulated
depreciation... 602,276 429,556 593,066 207,976 -- 51,590 46,626 44,554
Total assets..... 632,644 455,909 621,134 224,777 -- 58,679 53,688 48,647
Mortgages and
notes
payable........ 196,718 140,698 182,736 66,864 -- 64,347 60,279 56,455
Distribution
declared per
unit........... 0.45 0.425 1.75 .50 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Other Data:
Number of
in-service
properties....... 191 108 191 44 14 14 13 13
Total rentable
square feet...... 9,211,171 6,914,000 9,215,171 2,746,219 816,690 816,690 794,174 794,174
</TABLE>
(1) Rental property operating expenses include salaries, real estate taxes,
insurance, repairs and maintenance, property management, security and
utilities.
(2) Rental property operating expenses include salaries, real estate taxes,
insurance, repairs and maintenance, property management, security,
utilities, leasing, development, and construction expenses.
F-35
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Overview and Background
The Highwoods Group (the predecessor to the Company and Operating
Partnership) was comprised of 13 office properties and one warehouse facility
(the "Highwoods-Owned Properties"), 94 acres of development land and the
management, development and leasing business of Highwoods Properties Company
("HPC"). On June 14, 1994, following completion of the Company's initial public
offering of 8,510,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $21.00 per share, the
Operating Partnership, through a business combination involving entities under
varying common ownership, succeeded to the Highwoods-Owned Properties, HPC's
real estate business and 27 additional office properties owned by unaffiliated
parties (such combination being referred to as the "Formation Transaction"). The
Operating Partnership acquired three additional Properties in 1994 after the
Formation Transaction.
During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Operating Partnership acquired
144 Properties encompassing 6,357,000 square feet at a initial cost of
$369,900,000. The following table summarizes the mergers and acquisitions
completed during the year ended December 31, 1995 (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Rentable Initial
Property Location Properties Square Feet Cost
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Forsyth Transaction Piedmont Triad/Charlotte 57 3,630,565 $169,900
Richmond Expansion Richmond 10 362,844 28,700
Research Commons Research Triangle 6 539,310 60,000
Creekstone Crossing Research Triangle 1 59,299 4,500
Bissell Portfolio Piedmont Triad/Charlotte 56 920,283 36,900
Hock Portfolio Research Triangle 5 274,604 21,200
Six Forks I & II Research Triangle 2 89,470 8,800
Cotton Research Triangle 1 40,035 2,400
Parkway Plaza Charlotte 6 440,134 37,500
Total 144 6,356,544 $369,900
</TABLE>
The combined financial statements of the Highwoods Group for the period
from January 1, 1994 to June 13, 1994 and for the year ended December 31, 1993,
include the accounts of the management, leasing and development operations of
HPC and the partnerships that owned 14 buildings and two parcels of development
land. The Highwoods Group's financial statements have been presented on a
combined basis because of the affiliated general partners and common management
of the Highwoods-Owned Properties. Given the effect of the acquisitions
discussed above, the results of the Highwoods Group for the period from January
1, 1994 to June 13, 1994, and for the year ended December 31, 1993, are not
comparable to the current operations of the Operating Partnership.
This information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
financial statements and the related notes thereto.
The pro forma operating data for the year ended December 31, 1994 assumes
completion of the Initial Public Offering and the Formation Transaction as of
January 1, 1994. See Note 1 "Organization and Formation of the Company."
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 1996
Revenue from rental operations increased $10,692,000, or 84%, from
$12,693,000 in 1995 to $23,385,000 in 1996. The increase is a result of the
properties acquired during February 1995, which only contributed partially to
revenue in 1995 as well as the acquisitions made in subsequent periods in 1995.
In total, 147 properties encompassing 6.5 million square feet were added to the
portfolio in 1995. Same property (the 44 properties owned on January 1, 1995)
revenues remained constant for the three months ended
F-36
<PAGE>
March 31, 1996 compared to the same three months of 1995, as expected vacancies
in two of the Operating Partnership properties offset a two percent increase in
the revenues of the other 42 properties.
During the three months ended March 31, 1996, 127 leases representing
703,329 square feet of office and industrial space commenced at an average rate
per square foot 4.3% higher than the average rate per square foot on the expired
leases. Interest and other income increased $219,000 from $153,000 in 1995 to
$372,000 for the quarter in 1996. The increase is related to an increase in cash
available for investment for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.
Rental operating expenses increased $3,101,000 or 102%, from $3,053,000 in
1995 to $6,154,000 in 1996. The increase is a result of the additional
properties acquired in 1995. Rental operating expenses as a percent of related
rental revenues increased from 24.1% in 1995 to 26.3% in 1996. Additional
expenses relating to snow removal and the severe winter weather in 1996
contributed to the higher operating expenses.
Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 1996 and
1995 was $3,716,000 and $1,921,000, respectively. The increase of $1,795,002, or
93%, is due to an increase in depreciable assets. Interest expense increased
$1,481,000, or 60%, from $2,470,000 in 1995 to $3,951,000 in 1996. The increase
is attributable to the increase in outstanding debt related to the Operating
Partnership's acquisition activities. Interest expense for the three months
ended March 31, 1996 and 1995 included $409,000 and $404,000, respectively, of
amortization of non-cash deferred financing costs and of the costs related to
the Company's interest rate protection agreement. Interest expense for the 1995
period reflected a benefit of $385,000 as a result of the Operating
Partnership's interest rate protection agreements. General and administrative
expenses decreased from 4.1% of rental revenue in 1995 to 4.0% in 1996. This
decrease is attributable to economies of scale associated with the growth in the
size of the portfolio.
Net income before extraordinary item equaled $9,002,000 and $4,899,000 for
the three-month periods ended March 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Comparison of the Operating Partnership 1995 to the Operating Partnership Pro
Forma 1994
For the year ended December 31, 1995 total revenues were comprised of
$71,217,000 of rental revenues and $2,305,000 of interest and other income. For
the year ended December 31, 1994 pro forma total revenues included $33,626,000
of rental revenues, $200,000 in distributions from Highwoods Services, Inc. and
$456,000 of interest income.
The $37,591,000 increase in rental income from pro forma 1994 to 1995 was
primarily attributable to the rental revenue derived from properties acquired
during 1995. Revenues from the Operating Partnership's initial portfolio of 41
properties increased by 2.1% over the comparable 1994 period. Vacancies in
Smoketree Tower and Cape Fear partially offset rental rate increases and
occupancy gains in other properties.
The increase in interest income from $465,000 in pro forma 1994 to
$2,305,000 in 1995 was due primarily to the increase in short-term investments
during the three-month period following the Company's public offering of common
stock in August 1995.
Rental property expenses represented 23.9% of rental revenues in 1995
compared to 28.8% for pro forma 1994. The decline in this ratio was a result of
increased operating efficiencies and the addition of revenues from industrial
properties in 1995. Industrial properties are generally leased on a "triple net"
basis with the tenant paying all operating costs.
General and administrative expenses increased from $1,134,000 or 3.3% of
total revenues for pro forma 1994 to $2,737,000 or 3.7% of total revenues for
1995. The increase in general and administrative expenses was a result of the
growth of the Operating Partnership's operations into the Piedmont Triad and
Richmond.
Interest expense increased from $5,604,000 for pro forma 1994 to
$13,720,000 for 1995. The increase in interest expense was a result of an
increased debt level during 1995 compared to 1994 as the Operating Partnership
financed a portion of its 1995 acquisition activity through the use of debt
financing.
F-37
<PAGE>
Depreciation and amortization expense increased from $4,638,000 for pro
forma 1994 to $11,082,000 for 1995. The increase in depreciation and
amortization expense reflects the increase in real estate assets during 1995.
Net income before extraordinary item equaled $28,934,000 or $1.55 per Unit
for 1995 compared to $13,229,000 or $1.47 per Unit for pro forma 1994.
In connection with the repayment of indebtedness and the write-off of loan
origination fees, the Operating Partnership recorded extraordinary items of
($1,068,000) and ($1,422,000) in 1995 and 1994, respectively. The amount
recorded in 1994 resulted primarily from the repayment of indebtedness related
to the Forsyth Transaction.
Comparison of the Operating Partnership Pro Forma 1994 to the Highwoods Group
for the Year Ended December 31, 1993
For 1994, total revenue on a pro forma basis was $34,282,000 compared to
historical revenues of $13,450,000 for the Highwoods Group for the same period
of 1993. The net increase is primarily attributed to the addition of 27
additional office properties in connection with the initial public offering and
increased occupancy of the Highwoods Group offset by the decrease in non-rental
revenue (leasing, development and construction) due to the Operating Partnership
accounting for its interest in Highwoods Realty Services, Inc. and Highwoods
Leasing Company (the predecessors to Highwoods Services, Inc.) under the cost
method of accounting. Accordingly, on a pro forma basis, total revenues will
include only the distributions from such subsidiaries.
For 1994, rental property operating expenses total $9,677,000 and equaled
28.8% of rental revenues on a pro forma basis compared to $4,398,186 and 48.9%
of rental revenues for the Highwoods Group on a historical basis for the same
period of 1993. This decrease from historical to pro forma, as a percentage of
rental revenues, is due primarily to the operations of the properties of the
Operating Partnership on a combined, self-managed basis as compared to separate
entities historically. Major components of the decrease in rental operating
expenses as a percentage of rental revenues can be attributed to the provision
of management and leasing services by employees of the Operating Partnership for
which fees were paid historically.
For 1994 general and administrative expenses equaled $1,134,000 or 3.3% of
total revenues on a pro forma basis compared to $589,000 or 4.4% of total
revenues for 1993. Increased operating efficiencies in 1994 generated the
decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues.
For 1994, interest expense totaled $5,604,000 and equaled 16.3% of total
revenues on a pro forma basis compared to $5,185,000 and 38.6% of total revenues
on a historical basis for the Highwoods Group for the same period of 1993. This
decrease from historical to pro forma, as a percentage of total revenues, is due
primarily to the Operating Partnership's reduced leverage as a result of the
reduction of debt using proceeds from the initial public offering.
The increase in depreciation expense from $1,583,000 for the Highwoods
Group for 1993 to $4,638,000 for pro forma 1994 was due to the increase in real
estate assets during 1994 as the Operating Partnership increased its portfolio
from 14 properties to 44 properties.
For 1994, net income before minority interest would have been $13,229,000
on a pro forma basis compared to a loss of ($155,000) on a historical basis for
the Highwoods Group for the same period of 1993. Lower interest expense combined
with the operating efficiencies gained from operating the properties on a
combined basis and the increased revenues of the Operating Partnership were the
primary reasons for the increase in net income before minority interest from the
historical periods to the same periods on a pro forma basis.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Statement of Cash Flows
The Operating Partnership generated $11,445,000 in cash flow from operating
activities and $3,434,000 in cash flow from financing activities for the quarter
ended March 31, 1996. The Operating
F-38
<PAGE>
Partnership utilized $13.6 million of this cash flow to invest in real property
assets, primarily developments in process.
Capitalization
The Operating Partnership's total indebtedness at March 31, 1996 totaled
$196,718,000 and was comprised of $21,500,000 outstanding under the Company's
current $140,000,000 unsecured credit facility (the "Credit Facility"),
$134,300,000 of conventional fixed rate mortgage indebtedness with an average
rate of 9.0%, $35,900,000 outstanding under variable rate mortgages (see below
for a discussion of interest rate protection agreements) and a 9% $5,000,000
unsecured note.
Based on the Company's total market capitalization of $841.7 million at
March 31, 1996 (at the March 31, 1996 stock price of $27.88 and including the
conversion of the 3,732,000 units of minority interest in the Operating
Partnership), the Company's debt represented approximately 23% of its total
market capitalization.
In March 1996, the Operating Partnership closed on the $140 million Credit
Facility, which replaced the Operating Partnership's previous $80 million line.
The new facility is with NationsBank, First Union National Bank of North
Carolina, and Wachovia Bank of North Carolina. The Credit Facility requires
monthly payments of interest only, with the balance of all principal and accrued
but unpaid interest due on September 30, 1999. The initial interest rate on the
facility is LIBOR +1.5% and will adjust based on the Operating Partnership's
senior unsecured credit rating to a range of LIBOR +1.0% to LIBOR +1.50%,
subject to the interest rate protection agreement described below. At March 31,
1996, one-month LIBOR was 5.4%. (See "Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty
Trust, Inc." below for proposed credit facility modifications.)
To protect the Operating Partnership from increases in interest expense due
to changes in the variable rate the Operating Partnership: (i) purchased an
interest rate cap limiting its exposure to an increase in interest rates
(one-month LIBOR plus 150 basis points) to 7.0% with respect to $80,000,000 of
the $140,000,000 credit facility and (ii) in connection with the $35,900,000
variable rate mortgages, entered into interest rate swaps, which limit its
exposure to an increase in the interest rates to 7.24%. The interest rate on all
such variable rate debt is adjusted at monthly intervals, subject to the
Operating Partnership's interest rate protection program. Payments received from
the counterparties under the interest rate protection agreements were $0 and
$109,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 1996 and 1995 and $385,000 and $25,000
for the year ended 1995 and the period ended 1994, respectively. The Operating
Partnership is exposed to certain losses in the event of non-performance by the
counterparties under the cap and swap arrangements. The counterparties are major
financial institutions and are expected to fully perform under the agreements.
However, if they were to default on their obligations under the arrangements,
the Operating Partnership could be required to pay the full rate under its
Credit Facility and the variable rate mortgages, even if such rate were in
excess of the rate in the cap and swap agreements. In addition, the Operating
Partnership may incur other variable rate indebtedness in the future. Increases
in interest rates on its indebtedness could increase the Operating Partnership's
interest expense and could adversely affect the Operating Partnership's cash
flow and its ability to pay expected distributions to stockholders.
Historically, rental revenue has been the principal source of funds to pay
operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditures, excluding
non-recurring capital expenditures. In addition, construction management,
maintenance, leasing and management fees have provided sources of cash flow.
Management believes that the Operating Partnership will have access to the
capital resources necessary to expand and develop its business. To the extent
that the Operating Partnership's cash flow from operating activities is
insufficient to finance its acquisition costs and other capital expenditures,
including development costs, the Operating Partnership expects to finance such
activities through the Credit Facility and other debt and equity financing.
The Operating Partnership presently has no plans for major capital
improvements to the existing properties, other than normal recurring non-revenue
enhancing expenditures. The Operating Partnership expects to meet its short-term
liquidity requirements generally through its working capital and net cash
F-39
<PAGE>
provided by operating activities along with the previously discussed Credit
Facility. The Operating Partnership expects to meet certain of its financing
requirements through long-term secured and unsecured borrowings and the issuance
of debt securities or additional equity securities of the Operating Partnership.
In addition, the Operating Partnership anticipates utilizing the Credit Facility
primarily to fund construction and development activities. The Operating
Partnership does not intend to reserve funds to retire existing mortgage
indebtedness or indebtedness under the Credit Facility upon maturity. Instead,
the Operating Partnership will seek to refinance such debt at maturity or retire
such debt through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. The
Operating Partnership anticipates that its available cash and cash equivalents
and cash flows from operating activities, together with cash available from
borrowings and other sources, will be adequate to meet the capital and liquidity
needs of the Operating Partnership in both the short and long-term. However, if
these sources of funds are insufficient or unavailable, the Operating
Partnership's ability to make the expected distributions discussed below may be
adversely affected.
Nashville Acquisition
On April 1, 1996, the Company and the Operating Partnership completed a
transaction with Eakin & Smith and its affiliates ("Eakin & Smith") combining
their property portfolios, management teams and certain business operations.
Through the combination, the Operating Partnership succeeded to the ownership of
seven suburban office buildings totaling 848,000 square feet, a
103,000-square-foot suburban office development project and 18 acres of
development land, Eakin & Smith's brokerage and property management operations
were acquired at the Company level and are not part of the Operating
Partnership's operations. All the properties and development land are located in
Nashville, Tennessee. At March 31, 1996, the properties acquired in the
transaction were 97% leased.
The aggregate purchase price, assuming the completion of the in-process
development project, was approximately $98.5 million payable through the
issuance of 537,138 limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership and
489,421 shares of Common Stock, the assumption of $37 million of indebtedness
(with a weighted average fixed rate of 8.0%), and cash payments of approximately
$33 million. The Operating Partnership funded the cash payments with available
capacity under its New Credit Facility.
Pending Acquisition of Crocker Realty Trust, Inc.
On April 29, 1996, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Crocker Realty
Trust, Inc. ("Crocker"). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Cedar
Acquisition Corporation ("Cedar"), a newly formed subsidiary of the Company,
will merge into Crocker with the Company becoming the sole shareholder of
Crocker. The Company intends to contribute the shares of common stock of Crocker
to the Operating Partnership in exchange for limited partnership interests
therein. As a result, Crocker would become a subsidiary of the Operating
Partnership. As a result of the Merger, the Operating Partnership will acquire
58 suburban office properties and 12 service center properties (the "Crocker
Properties") located in 15 Southeastern markets in Florida, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia and Alabama. The Crocker Properties
encompass 5.7 million rentable square feet and, at March 31, 1996, were 95%
leased.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company will acquire all of
the outstanding capital stock of Crocker in exchange for a cash payment of
$11.02 per share, subject to certain adjustments. Based on Crocker's 26,981,087
shares of outstanding capital stock at May 31, 1996, the purchase price will
total approximately $297 million. In addition, the Company will cash out certain
existing options and warrants to purchase Crocker common stock for an estimated
$4.2 million and assume approximately $240 million of Crocker's currently
outstanding indebtedness, having a weighted average interest rate of 8.6%. In
connection with the Merger, the Company has also entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") with AP CRTI Holdings, L. P. (an
affiliate of Apollo Real Estate Advisors), AEW Partners, L.P. (an investment
partnership advised by Aldrich Eastman Waltch), and Crocker's three senior
executives (Thomas J. Crocker, Richard S. Ackerman and Robert E. Onisko), who
together own approximately 83% of Crocker's outstanding common stock
(collectively, the "Crocker Selling Shareholders"), which obligates such
shareholders to sell their shares to the Company at a cash price of $11.02,
subject to the same adjustments as required under the Merger Agreement. The
approximately $247 million purchase price of such shares is part of the total
approximately $297 million purchase price for all of Crocker's outstanding
shares.
F-40
<PAGE>
The Merger Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement may be terminated by the
respective parties only in certain limited circumstances. In addition, under the
terms of the Merger Agreement, certain specified assets and liabilities of
Crocker will not be acquired by the Company.
In connection with the Merger, the Company obtained a commitment from
NationsBank and First Union National Bank of North Carolina for a $250 million
revolving line of credit (the "Revolving Loan"). The Revolving Loan will replace
the Credit Facility and will be used together with the proceeds from the
Offering to fund the Merger.
The Revolving Loan will be unsecured for the first nine months and will
bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 150 basis points. After the initial
nine-month period, the Revolving Loan will either convert to a secured loan with
a maturity date two years from its closing date or to an unsecured loan maturing
on July 31, 1999. The Revolving Loan will remain unsecured if the Company
generates at least $300 million of net proceeds from equity offerings (including
the proceeds from this Offering) during the initial nine-month period and meets
certain covenants, including covenants relating to debt ratios, tangible net
worth and interest coverage.
If the Revolving Loan remains unsecured after the initial nine-month
period, it would have an interest rate that ranged from LIBOR plus 100 basis
points to LIBOR plus 175 basis points based on the Company's senior unsecured
credit rating. If the loan converts to a secured facility, the Company will be
required to pledge assets at least equal in value to 60% of the outstanding
amount of the Revolving Loan and the interest rate will equal LIBOR plus 175
basis points.
Funds From Operations and Cash Available for Distributions
The Operating Partnership considers Funds from Operations ("FFO") to be a
useful financial performance measure of the operating performance of an equity
REIT because, together with net income and cash flows, FFO provides investors
with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a REIT to incur and service
debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures. Funds from
Operations does not represent net income or cash flows from operations as
defined by GAAP and FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income
as an indicator of the Operating Partnership's operating performance or as an
alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Funds from Operations does
not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of the Operating
Partnership's cash needs including principal amortization, capital improvements
and distributions to shareholders. Funds from Operations does not represent cash
flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP.
Further, FFO as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to the Operating
Partnership's calculation of FFO, as described below.
Funds From Operations means net income (computed in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles) excluding gains (or losses) from debt
restructuring and sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. In March
1995, NAREIT issued a clarification of the definition of FFO. The clarification
provides that amortization of deferred financing costs and depreciation of
non-real estate assets are no longer to be added back to net income in arriving
at FFO. Cash available for distribution is defined as funds from operations
reduced by non-revenue enhancing capital expenditures for building improvements
and tenant improvements and lease commissions related to second generation
space.
Funds from operations and cash available for distributions should not be
considered as alternatives to net income as an indication of the Operating
Partnership's performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.
F-41
<PAGE>
Funds from operations and cash available for distribution for the quarters
ended March 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for
the period from June 14, 1994 to December 31, 1994 are summarized in the
following table (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period From
Quarter Ended Year Ended June 14 to
March 31, December 31, December 31,
1996 1995 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income before extraordinary item............................ $ 9,002 $ 4,879 $ 28,934 $ 7,695
Add (deduct):
Depreciation and amortization............................. 3,716 1,921 11,082 2,607
Third-party service company cash flow..................... 150 -- -- --
Funds from operations before minority interest......... 12,868 6,800 40,016 10,302
Cash Available for Distribution:
Add (deduct):
Rental income from straight-line rents.................... (400) (267) (1,519) (503)
Amortization of deferred financing costs.................. 409 404 1,619 738
Non-incremental revenue generating capital expenditures:
Building improvements paid............................. (474) (128) (1,337) (150)
Second generation tenant improvements paid............. (750) (198) (1,884) (347)
Second generation lease commissions paid............... (112) (158) (1,228) (180)
Cash available for distribution...................... $11,541 $ 6,453 $ 35,667 $ 9,860
Weighted average units outstanding.......................... 23,139 13,418 18,697 9,991
Dividend payout ratio:
Funds from operations..................................... 80.9% 83.9% 81.8% 89.7%
Cash available from distribution.......................... 90.3% 88.4% 91.7% 93.7%
</TABLE>
Inflation
In the last five years, inflation has not had a significant impact on the
Operating Partnership because of the relatively low inflation rate in the
Operating Partnership's geographic areas of operation. Most of the leases
require the tenants to pay their pro rata share of operating expenses, including
common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing the
Operating Partnership's exposure to increases in operating expenses resulting
from inflation. In addition, many of the leases are for terms of less than seven
years, which may enable the Operating Partnership to replace existing leases
with new leases at a higher base if rents on the existing leases are below the
then-existing market rate.
F-42
<PAGE>
(Inside Back Cover Picture Page)
(Highwood Logo) Existing Properties
Top Left Photo--Parkway Plaza 3, Charlotte, NC
Top Right Photo--3401 West End, Nashville, TN
Middle Photo--Parkway Plaza 7, Charlotte, NC
Bottom Left Photo--Regency One, Piedmont Triad,NC
Bottom Right Photo--5310 Maryland Way, Nashville, TN
<PAGE>
NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS NOT CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER MADE BY THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE
ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS. IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION
MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY OR THE
UNDERWRITERS. THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS DO NOT
CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL, OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, THE SHARES IN
ANY JURISDICTION WHERE, OR TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM, IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH
OFFER OR SOLICITATION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND
THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE AN IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY CHANGE IN THE
FACTS SET FORTH IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS OR
IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY SINCE THE DATE HEREOF.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
<S> <C>
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
Prospectus Supplement Summary........................ S-3
Risk Factors......................................... S-12
The Company.......................................... S-15
Recent Developments.................................. S-17
Use of Proceeds...................................... S-24
Price Range of Common Stock and Distribution
History............................................ S-25
Capitalization....................................... S-26
Selected Financial Data.............................. S-26
Business and Properties.............................. S-28
Management........................................... S-50
Underwriting......................................... S-52
Legal Matters........................................ S-53
Index to Pro Forma Financial Statements.............. F-1
PROSPECTUS
Available Information................................ 2
Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference.......................................... 2
The Company and the Operating Partnership............ 3
Risk Factors......................................... 4
Use of Proceeds...................................... 9
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends.......................... 9
Description of Debt Securities....................... 9
Description of Preferred Stock....................... 23
Description of Depositary Shares..................... 28
Description of Common Stock.......................... 31
Federal Income Tax Considerations.................... 33
Plan of Distribution................................. 44
Experts.............................................. 45
Legal Matters........................................ 46
</TABLE>
10,000,000 SHARES
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. (HIGHWOODS LOGO)
COMMON STOCK
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC.
MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
INCORPORATED
PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED
PRUDENTAL SECURTES INCORPORATED
THE ROBINSON-HUMPHREY
COMPANY, INC.
SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC.
JUNE , 1996
<PAGE>
PART II
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
The expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, in
connection with the offering of the securities being registered are set forth
below. All of such expenses are estimates, except the Securities Act
registration fee.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Securities Act registration fee........................................... $ 344,828
Legal fees and expenses................................................... 200,000
Printing fees............................................................. 100,000
Accounting fees and expenses.............................................. 100,000
Blue sky fees and expenses................................................ 15,000
New York Stock Exchange listing fees...................................... 80,000
NASD fees................................................................. 30,500
Trustee expenses and fees................................................. 15,000
Fees of rating agencies................................................... 100,000
Miscellaneous............................................................. 14,672
TOTAL..................................................................... $ 1,000,000
</TABLE>
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
The Company's officers and directors are and will be indemnified against
certain liabilities in accordance with the MGCL, the Articles of Incorporation
and bylaws of the Company and the Operating Partnership Agreement. The Articles
of Incorporation require the Company to indemnify its directors and officers to
the fullest extent permitted from time to time by the MGCL. The MGCL permits a
corporation to indemnify its directors and officers, among others, against
judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually
incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made a
party by reasons of their service in those or other capacities unless it is
established that the act or omission of the director or officer was material to
the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was
the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, or the director or officer
actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services,
or in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had
reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.
The Operating Partnership Agreement also provides for indemnification of
the Company and its officers and directors to the same extent indemnification is
provided to officers and directors of the Company in its Articles of
Incorporation and limits the liability of the Company and its officers and
directors to the Operating Partnership and its partners to the same extent
liability of officers and directors of the Company to the Company and its
stockholders is limited under the Company's Articles of Incorporation.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Company
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the Company has been informed that in the
opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore
unenforceable.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
<C> <S>
1.1(1) Form of Underwriting Agreement for Debt Securities
1.2(1) Form of Underwriting Agreement for Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Depositary Shares
4.1(1) Form of Indenture
4.2(2) Form of Designating Amendment relating to Preferred Stock
4.3(2) Form of Preferred Stock Certificate
4.4(2) Form of Deposit Agreement
5.1(a)(1) Opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., regarding the legality of the Securities
being registered
</TABLE>
II-1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
<C> <S>
5.1(b)(1)Opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., regarding the legality of shares of Common
Stock being offered pursuant to the Prospectus Supplement
5.2(1) Opinion of Piper & Marbury L.L.P.
8 (1) Opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., regarding certain Federal tax matters
12 (1) Statement of computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
23.1 Consent of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. (included as part of Exhibits 5.1(a) and
5.1(b) and 8)
23.2 Consent of Piper & Marbury L.L.P. (included as part of Exhibit 5.2)
23.3 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
23.4(1) Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
23.5(1) Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
23.6(1) Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
23.7(1) Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP
24 (1) Power of Attorney
25 (2) Statement of Eligibility of Trustee on Form T-1
</TABLE>
(1) Previously filed.
(2) To be filed by amendment or incorporated by reference in connection with the
offering of the applicable Securities.
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.
(a) The undersigned registrants hereby undertake:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the
effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective
amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a
fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities
offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that
which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the
estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus
filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the
changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum
aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee"
table in the effective registration statement; and
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any
material change to such information in the Registration Statement;
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the undertakings set forth in paragraphs 1(i) and
1(ii) shall not apply if the information required to be included in a
post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports
filed with or furnished to the Commission by the registrant pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated
by reference in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any
of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering.
II-2
<PAGE>
(b) The undersigned registrants hereby further undertake that, for purposes
of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of
the registrants' annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(c) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
Registrants pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrants
have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act
and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrants of expenses
incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrants
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the Registrants will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it or
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue.
(d) The undersigned registrants hereby further undertake that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of
1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this
registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h)
under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration
statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
The undersigned registrants hereby further undertake to file an application
for the purpose of determining the eligibility of the trustee to act under
subsection (a) of section 310 of the Trust Indenture Act ("Act") in accordance
with the rules and regulations prescribed by the Commission under section
305(b)(2) of the Act.
II-3
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, each Registrant
certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this Amendment No. 3 to
registration statement File No. 333-3890 and 333-3890-01 to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Raleigh,
State of North Carolina, on June 20, 1996.
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
By: /s/ RONALD P. GIBSON*
RONALD P. GIBSON
PRESIDENT
HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
By: /s/ RONALD P. GIBSON*
RONALD P. GIBSON
PRESIDENT
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment
No. 3 to registration statement File No. 333-3890 and 333-3890-01 has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME TITLE DATE
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ O. TEMPLE SLOAN, JR.* Chairman of the Board of Directors June 20, 1996
O. TEMPLE SLOAN, JR.
/s/ RONALD P. GIBSON* President, Chief Executive Officer June 20, 1996
RONALD P. GIBSON and Director
/s/ WILLIAM T. WILSON, III* Executive Vice President, Chief June 20, 1996
WILLIAM T. WILSON, III Operating Officer and Director
/s/ JOHN L. TURNER* Chief Investment Officer and Vice June 20, 1996
JOHN L. TURNER Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ JOHN W. EAKIN* Vice President and Director June 20, 1996
JOHN W. EAKIN
/s/ THOMAS S. SMITH* Vice President and Director June 20, 1996
THOMAS S. SMITH
/s/ THOMAS W. ADLER* Director June 20, 1996
THOMAS W. ADLER
</TABLE>
II-4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ WILLIAM E. GRAHAM, JR.* Director June 20, 1996
WILLIAM E. GRAHAM, JR.
/s/ ROBERT L. KIRBY* Director June 20, 1996
ROBERT L. KIRBY
/s/ L. GLENN ORR, JR.* Director June 20, 1996
L. GLENN ORR, JR.
Director
WILLARD H. SMITH, JR.
/s/ STEPHEN TIMKO* Director June 20, 1996
STEPHEN TIMKO
/s/ CARMAN J. LIUZZO Vice President, Chief Financial June 20, 1996
CARMAN J. LIUZZO Officer and Treasurer (Principal
Accounting Officer)
/s/ CARMAN J. LIUZZO June 20, 1996
*BY CARMAN J. LIUZZO PURSUANT TO A POWER OF ATTORNEY
</TABLE>
II-5
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
<C> <S>
1.1(1) Form of Underwriting Agreement for Debt Securities
1.2(1) Form of Underwriting Agreement for Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Depositary Shares
4.1(1) Form of Indenture
4.2(2) Form of Designating Amendment relating to Preferred Stock
4.3(2) Form of Preferred Stock Certificate
4.4(2) Form of Deposit Agreement
5.1(a)(1) Opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., regarding the legality of the Securities being
registered
5.1(b)(1) Opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., regarding the legality of shares of Common
Stock being offered pursuant to the Prospectus Supplement
5.2(1) Opinion of Piper & Marbury L.L.P.
8 (1) Opinion of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., regarding certain Federal tax matters
12 (1) Statement of computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
23.1 Consent of Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. (included as part of Exhibits 5.1(a) and 5.1(b)
and 8)
23.2 Consent of Piper & Marbury L.L.P. (included as part of Exhibit 5.2)
23.3 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
23.4(1) Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
23.5(1) Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
23.6(1) Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
23.7(1) Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP
24 (1) Power of Attorney
25 (2) Statement of Eligibility of Trustee on Form T-1
</TABLE>
(1) Previously filed.
(2) To be filed by amendment or incorporated by reference in connection with the
offering of the applicable Securities.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.3
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report related to Highwoods/Forsyth Limited Partnership dated
February 2, 1996, except Note 8, as to which the date is April 29, 1996 and our
report related to the Highwoods Group dated January 10, 1995 in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 No. 333-3890 and 333-3890-01, Amendment No. 3, and
related Prospectus of Highwoods Properties, Inc., and Highwoods/Forsyth Limited
Partnership for the registration of up to $650,000,000 of common stock,
preferred stock and preferred stock represented by depositary shares issued by
Highwoods Properties, Inc. and up to $350,000,000 of non-convertible debt
securities issued by Highwoods/Forsyth Limited Partnership. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference therein of our reports (a) dated February 2, 1996
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Highwoods
Properties, Inc., included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1995 (as amended on Form 10-K/A dated June 3, 1996 and June 18,
1996) and (b) dated January 16, 1996 with respect to the audited Statement of
Revenue and Certain Expenses of TBC Parkway Plaza, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1994, included in its Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 21,
1996, (c) dated July 18, 1995 with respect to the audited Combined Statement of
Revenue and Certain Expenses of the Acquired Properties for the year ended
December 31, 1994, included in its Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 12,
1995 (as amended on Form 8-K/A on September 6, 1995), (d) dated January 4, 1995
with respect to the audited Statement of Revenue and Certain Expenses of
Research Commons for the year ended December 31, 1994 included in its Current
Report on Form 8-K dated February 10, 1995, (e) dated April 17, 1996 with
respect to the combined audited financial statements and schedule of Eakin &
Smith for the year ended December 31, 1995 included in its Current Report on
Form 8-K/A dated April 1, 1996 as amended on June 3, 1996 and June 18, 1996 and
(f) dated February 26, 1996 with respect to the audited Historical Summary of
Gross Income and Direct Operating Expenses for certain properties owned by
Towermarc Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995 included in its
Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 29, 1996 as amended on June 3, 1996 and
June 18, 1996, all filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
June 20, 1996
