NEW YORK TOTAL RETURN BOND PORTFOLIO
POS AMI, 1995-08-02
Previous: LABORATORY CORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, 8-K, 1995-08-02
Next: EMPIRE STATE MUNICIPAL EXEMPT TRUST GUARANTEED SERIES 105, 497J, 1995-08-02




As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 1995
File No. 811-8462

==============================================================================




                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549




                                   FORM N-1A

                             REGISTRATION STATEMENT

                                     UNDER

                       THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940


                                AMENDMENT NO. 2



                    THE NEW YORK TOTAL RETURN BOND PORTFOLIO

               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)



                6 St. James Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02116

                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)



              Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
                                 (617) 423-0800



        James B. Craver, 6 St. James Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02116

                    (Name and Address of Agent for Service)

                         Copy to: Steven K. West, Esq.
                              Sullivan & Cromwell
                                125 Broad Street
                               New York, NY 10004



==============================================================================
 JPM437
<PAGE>
                               EXPLANATORY NOTE


     This Registration Statement has been filed by the Registrant pursuant to
Section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. However,
beneficial interests in the Registrant are not being registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") because such interests will be issued
solely in private placement transactions that do not involve any "public
offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. Investments in the
Registrant may only be made by other investment companies, insurance company
separate accounts, common or commingled trust funds or similar organizations or
entities that are "accredited investors" within the meaning of Regulation D
under the 1933 Act. This Registration Statement does not constitute an offer to
sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any beneficial interests in the
Registrant.
<PAGE>



                                     PART A


         Responses  to Items 1 through 3 and 5A have been  omitted  pursuant  to
paragraph 4 of Instruction F of the General Instructions to Form N-1A.

ITEM 4.  GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT.


         The New  York  Total  Return  Bond  Portfolio  (the  "Portfolio")  is a
no-load,  non-diversified,  open-end  management  investment  company  which was
organized  as a trust under the laws of the State of New York on June 16,  1993.
Beneficial  interests in the Portfolio  are issued  solely in private  placement
transactions  that do not involve any  "public  offering"  within the meaning of
Section  4(2) of the  Securities  Act of 1933,  as  amended  (the  "1933  Act").
Investments  in the  Portfolio may only be made by other  investment  companies,
insurance company separate accounts, common or commingled trust funds or similar
organizations or entities that are "accredited  investors" within the meaning of
Regulation D under the 1933 Act. This Registration Statement does not constitute
an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any "security"  within
the meaning of the 1933 Act.


         Investments  in the  Portfolio are not deposits or  obligations  of, or
guaranteed  or endorsed by, Morgan  Guaranty  Trust Company of New York ("Morgan
Guaranty" or the  "Advisor")  or any other bank.  Interests in the Portfolio are
not federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,  the Federal
Reserve Board or any other  governmental  agency. An investment in the Portfolio
is subject to risk, as the net asset value of the Portfolio  will fluctuate with
changes in the value of the Portfolio's holdings. There can be no assurance that
the investment objective of the Portfolio will be achieved.

         The Portfolio is advised by Morgan Guaranty.


         Part  B  contains  more  detailed   information  about  the  Portfolio,
including information related to (i) the investment policies and restrictions of
the Portfolio,  (ii) the Trustees,  officers,  Advisor and  administrator of the
Portfolio,  (iii)  portfolio  transactions,   (iv)  rights  and  liabilities  of
investors and (v) the audited financial statements of the Portfolio at March 31,
1995.


         The investment objective of the Portfolio is described below,  together
with the  policies  employed to attempt to achieve  this  objective.  Additional
information  about the investment  policies of the Portfolio  appears in Part B,
under Item 13.

         The Portfolio's investment objective is to provide a high


<PAGE>


                                      A-2


after tax total return for New York residents  consistent  with moderate risk of
capital. Total return will consist of income plus capital gains and losses.

         The Portfolio is designed for investors who seek a high after tax total
return and who are willing to receive some taxable  income and capital  gains to
achieve that return.

         The Portfolio's primary investments are municipal  securities issued by
New York State and its political  subdivisions and by agencies,  authorities and
instrumentalities of New York and its political  subdivisions.  These securities
earn income  exempt from  federal and New York State and local income taxes but,
in  certain  circumstances,  may be  subject  to  alternative  minimum  tax.  In
addition,  the  Portfolio  may invest in municipal  securities  issued by states
other than New York, by  territories  and  possessions  of the United States and
their political subdivisions,  agencies and instrumentalities.  These securities
earn income  exempt from federal  income taxes but subject to New York State and
local  income  taxes.  In order to seek to  enhance  the  Portfolio's  after tax
return,  the Advisor may also invest in securities  which earn income subject to
New York and/or federal income taxes. These securities  include U.S.  government
securities,  corporate  securities and municipal  securities issued on a taxable
basis. For more information  regarding tax matters, see Item 20 in Part B. Since
the Portfolio  limits its purchases to investment grade  securities,  it may not
obtain the higher current  income  available  from lower rated  securities.  See
"Quality Information" below.

         The Advisor actively manages the Portfolio's  duration,  the allocation
of securities  across market  sectors and the selection of securities to seek to
achieve a high after tax total return. Based on fundamental economic and capital
markets research,  the Advisor adjusts the duration of the Portfolio in light of
the Advisor's interest rate outlook. For example, if interest rates are expected
to rise, the duration may be shortened to lessen the Portfolio's exposure to the
expected  decrease  in bond  prices.  If interest  rates are  expected to remain
stable,  the  Advisor  may  lengthen  the  duration  in  order  to  enhance  the
Portfolio's yield.

         Duration  is a measure of the  weighted  average  maturity of the bonds
held in the  Portfolio  and can be used as a measure of the  sensitivity  of the
Portfolio's  market value to changes in interest rates.  The longer the duration
of the  Portfolio,  the  greater  its price  sensitivity.  Under  normal  market
conditions,  the Advisor believes the Portfolio will have a duration of three to
seven years.  The maturity of  individual  securities  in the Portfolio may vary
widely, however.

         The  Advisor  also  attempts  to  enhance  after  tax  total  return by
allocating the  Portfolio's  assets among market  sectors.  Specific  securities
which the Advisor  believes are  undervalued  are  selected for purchase  within
sectors  using  advanced  quantitative  tools,  analysis  of  credit  risk,  the
expertise of a dedicated trading desk and the judgment of fixed income portfolio


<PAGE>


                                      A-3


managers and analysts.

         In seeking to achieve the Portfolio's investment objective, the Advisor
attempts  to  consider  the  tax  consequences  to  investors  of all  portfolio
transactions.  The  Advisor  will sell and  purchase  securities  to change  the
Portfolio's  duration,  sector  allocation  or  securities  holdings  only if it
believes  that the expected  benefit to the  Portfolio  will be greater than the
capital gains or income taxes investors' shareholders would incur as a result of
these sales and purchases. The success of this strategy depends on the Advisor's
ability to forecast accurately changes in interest rates and assess the value of
fixed income securities.

         The Advisor intends to manage the Portfolio  actively in pursuit of its
investment  objective.  Portfolio  transactions  are  undertaken  principally to
accomplish the  Portfolio's  objective in relation to expected  movements in the
general  level of interest  rates,  but the  Portfolio  may engage in short-term
trading consistent with its objective. The estimated portfolio turnover rate for
the Portfolio generally should not exceed 100%. Portfolio transactions may incur
taxable  long term or short term  capital  gains which will be  distributed  and
taxable to investors.
 In addition,  to the extent the Portfolio engages in short-term trading, it may
incur  increased  transactions  costs.  See Item 20 in Part B. Annual  portfolio
turnover rate is expected to be less than 100%.

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES

         Under normal  circumstances,  the Portfolio will invest at least 65% of
its  total  assets in  municipal  securities  issued  by New York  State and its
political  subdivisions and their agencies,  authorities and  instrumentalities.
The Portfolio  may also invest in debt  obligations  of municipal  issuers other
than New York.  The  municipal  securities  in which the  Portfolio  invests are
primarily municipal bonds and municipal notes.

         MUNICIPAL  BONDS.  The  Portfolio  may invest in bonds  issued by or on
behalf of New York State,  other  states,  territories  and  possessions  of the
United  States  and their  political  subdivisions,  agencies,  authorities  and
instrumentalities.  These obligations may be general obligation bonds secured by
the issuer's  pledge of its full faith,  credit and taxing power for the payment
of principal  and  interest,  or they may be revenue bonds payable from specific
revenue sources, but not generally backed by the issuer's taxing power.

         MUNICIPAL  NOTES.  The Portfolio may also invest in municipal  notes of
various types,  including notes issued in anticipation of receipt of taxes,  the
proceeds  of the sale of bonds,  other  revenues or grant  proceeds,  as well as
municipal  commercial  paper and municipal  demand  obligations such as variable
rate demand notes and master demand obligations. The interest rate on


<PAGE>


                                      A-4


variable rate demand notes is  adjustable at periodic  intervals as specified in
the notes.  Master  demand  obligations  permit the  investment  of  fluctuating
amounts at periodically adjusted interest rates. They are governed by agreements
between  the  municipal  issuer  and  Morgan  Guaranty  acting as agent,  for no
additional fee, in its capacity as Advisor to the Portfolio and as fiduciary for
other clients.  Although  master demand  obligations are not marketable to third
parties,  the Portfolio  considers them to be liquid because they are payable on
demand.  There is no specific  percentage  limitation on these investments.  For
more information about municipal notes, see Item 13 in Part B.

         NEW YORK MUNICIPAL SECURITIES.  Because of the Portfolio's  significant
investment in New York municipal securities, its performance will be affected by
the  condition  of New York's  economy,  as well as the fiscal  condition of the
State,  its agencies and  municipalities.  The New York State economy  generally
remains  weak,  despite  some signs of growth.  Compounding  this  effect is the
presence of a persistent budget deficit and the significant claims placed on the
State's  budget by education,  social  service,  and  infrastructure  needs.  In
addition,  the  New  York  City  economy  and  fiscal  condition  have  profound
influences  upon the  market  for most New York debt  obligations.  The  Advisor
currently  views the New York economy and financial  condition as  fundamentally
stable.  However,  the  possibility  of a disruption  to economic and  financial
conditions which would adversely affect the  creditworthiness  and marketability
of New  York  municipal  securities  continues  to  exist.  For a more  detailed
discussion  of  the  risks  associated  with  investing  in New  York  municipal
securities, see Item 13 in Part B.


NON-MUNICIPAL SECURITIES.


         The  Portfolio  may  invest  in  non-municipal   securities   including
obligations of the U.S. government and its agencies and instrumentalities,  bank
obligations,  debt  securities of corporate  issuers,  asset backed and mortgage
related  securities  and  repurchase  agreements.  The Portfolio  will invest in
non-municipal  securities when, in the opinion of the Advisor,  these securities
will  enhance  the after tax total  return to  investors'  shareholders  who are
subject to federal and New York State  income  taxes in the highest tax bracket.
Under normal circumstances, the Portfolio's holdings of non-municipal securities
and municipal  securities of tax-exempt  issuers outside New York State will not
exceed 35% of its total assets.


QUALITY INFORMATION.

         The Portfolio will not purchase a security  unless it is rated at least
Baa or better by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") or BBB or better by
Standard & Poor's Ratings Group ("Standard & Poor's"),  or a security is unrated
and



<PAGE>


                                      A-5



in the  Advisor's  opinion is of  comparable  quality.  Securities  rated Baa by
Moody's or BBB by Standard & Poor's are considered  investment  grade,  but have
some speculative characteristics.  These standards must be satisfied at the time
an investment  is made. If the quality of the  investment  later  declines,  the
Portfolio  may continue to hold the  investment.  See Item 13 in Part B for more
detailed information on these ratings.

NON-DIVERSIFICATION.


         The  Portfolio is registered as a  non-diversified  investment  company
which means that the Portfolio is not limited by the  Investment  Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"),  in the  proportion of its assets that may be
invested in the obligations of a single issuer. Thus, the Portfolio may invest a
greater  proportion  of its  assets in the  securities  of a  smaller  number of
issuers  and, as a result,  will be subject to greater  risk with respect to its
portfolio   securities.   The   Portfolio,   however,   will   comply  with  the
diversification  requirements  imposed by the Internal  Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code") for qualification as a regulated  investment  company.  See
"Investment Restrictions" below and Item 20 in Part B.


         The  Portfolio  may also purchase  municipal  securities  together with
puts, purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, enter into
repurchase and reverse repurchase  agreements,  purchase synthetic variable rate
instruments,  loan its securities,  purchase certain privately placed securities
and enter into certain  futures and options  transactions.  For a discussion  of
these transactions, see below.


ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS

         WHEN-ISSUED AND DELAYED DELIVERY SECURITIES. The Portfolio may purchase
securities on a when-issued or delayed  delivery basis.  Delivery of and payment
for these  securities  may take as long as a month or more after the date of the
purchase  commitment.  The  value of  these  securities  is  subject  to  market
fluctuation  during  this  period  and no  interest  or  income  accrues  to the
Portfolio until settlement. At the time of settlement a when-issued security may
be valued at less than its purchase  price.  The  Portfolio  maintains  with the
Custodian a separate  account with a segregated  portfolio of  securities  in an
amount at least equal to these commitments.  When entering into a when-issued or
delayed  delivery  transaction,  the  Portfolio  will rely on the other party to
consummate the transaction; if the other party fails to do so, the Portfolio may
be  disadvantaged.  It is the current  policy of the Portfolio not to enter into
when-issued  commitments  exceeding in the  aggregate 15% of the market value of
the Portfolio's total assets less liabilities other than the obligations created
by these commitments.

         REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. The Portfolio may engage in repurchase agreement
transactions with brokers, dealers or banks


<PAGE>


                                      A-6


that meet the credit  guidelines  established  by the Trustees.  In a repurchase
agreement,  the  Portfolio  buys a  security  from a seller  that has  agreed to
repurchase it at a mutually agreed upon date and price,  reflecting the interest
rate  effective for the term of the agreement.  The term of these  agreements is
usually from  overnight to one week. A repurchase  agreement  may be viewed as a
fully collateralized loan of money by the Portfolio to the seller. The Portfolio
always  receives  securities as collateral with a market value at least equal to
the purchase price plus accrued interest and this value is maintained during the
term of the agreement. If the seller defaults and the collateral value declines,
the Portfolio  might incur a loss. If bankruptcy  proceedings are commenced with
respect to the seller,  the  Portfolio's  realization  upon the  disposition  of
collateral  may  be  delayed  or  limited.  Investments  in  certain  repurchase
agreements and certain other  investments  which may be considered  illiquid are
limited.  See "Illiquid  Investments;  Privately  Placed and other  Unregistered
Securities" below.



         LOANS  OF  PORTFOLIO  SECURITIES.   Subject  to  applicable  investment
restrictions,  the Portfolio is permitted to lend its securities in an amount up
to 33 1/3% of the value of the  Portfolio's  net assets.  The Portfolio may lend
its  securities  if such loans are secured  continuously  by cash or  equivalent
collateral  or by a letter of credit in favor of the Portfolio at least equal at
all times to 100% of the market  value of the  securities  loaned,  plus accrued
interest. While such securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Portfolio
any  income  accruing  thereon.  Loans will be  subject  to  termination  by the
Portfolio in the normal  settlement  time,  generally  five  business days after
notice,  or by the borrower on one day's  notice.  Borrowed  securities  must be
returned  when the loan is  terminated.  Any gain or loss in the market price of
the borrowed  securities  which occurs during the term of the loan inures to the
Portfolio  and its  respective  investors.  The  Portfolio  may  pay  reasonable
finders'  and  custodial  fees in  connection  with a  loan.  In  addition,  the
Portfolio   will   consider   all  facts   and   circumstances   including   the
creditworthiness of the borrowing financial institution,  and the Portfolio will
not make any  loans in  excess  of one  year.  The  Portfolio  will not lend its
securities to any officer, Trustee, Director, employee or other affiliate of the
Portfolio,  the  Advisor or the  exclusive  placement  agent,  unless  otherwise
permitted by applicable law.

         REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. The Portfolio is permitted to enter into
reverse repurchase agreements.  In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Portfolio
sells a security and agrees to repurchase it at a mutually  agreed upon date and
price, reflecting the interest rate effective for the term of the agreement. For
the  purposes of the 1940 Act, it is  considered  as a form of  borrowing by the
Portfolio and, therefore, is a form of leverage.

 Leverage may cause any gains or losses of the Portfolio to be


<PAGE>


                                      A-7


magnified.  For more information, see Item 13 in Part B.


         PUTS. The Portfolio may purchase without limit municipal bonds or notes
together  with the right to resell  them at an  agreed  price or yield  within a
specified period prior to maturity.  This right to resell is known as a put. The
aggregate price paid for securities with puts may be higher than the price which
otherwise  would be paid.  The principal risk of puts is that the put writer may
default on its obligation to repurchase.  The Advisor will monitor each writer's
ability to meet its obligations under puts. The amortized cost method is used by
the Portfolio to value all municipal  securities with maturities of less than 60
days;  when these  securities  are subject to puts separate from the  underlying
securities,  no  value  is  assigned  to the  puts.  The cost of any such put is
carried as an unrealized loss from the time of purchase until it is exercised or
expires.  See Part B for the valuation procedure if the Portfolio were to invest
in municipal  securities  with maturities of 60 days or more that are subject to
separate puts.

         SYNTHETIC  VARIABLE  RATE  INSTRUMENTS.  The  Portfolio  may  invest in
certain synthetic variable rate instruments.  Such instruments generally involve
the deposit of a long-term tax exempt bond in a custody or trust arrangement and
the creation of a mechanism to adjust the long-term interest rate on the bond to
a variable  short-term  rate and a right (subject to certain  conditions) on the
part of the  purchaser  to tender it  periodically  to a third party at par. The
Advisor will review the  structure of synthetic  variable  rate  instruments  to
identify  credit and liquidity risks  (including the conditions  under which the
right to tender the  instrument  would no longer be available)  and will monitor
those risks.  In the event that the right to tender the  instrument is no longer
available, the risk to the Portfolio will be that of holding the long-term bond.

         ILLIQUID   INVESTMENTS;   PRIVATELY   PLACED  AND  OTHER   UNREGISTERED
SECURITIES.  The  Portfolio  may not acquire any  illiquid  securities  if, as a
result thereof,  more than 15% of the market value of the Portfolio's net assets
would  be in  illiquid  investments.  Subject  to  this  non-fundamental  policy
limitation,  the  Portfolio  may acquire  investments  that are illiquid or have
limited  liquidity,  such as  private  placements  or  investments  that are not
registered  under the 1933 Act and  cannot be  offered  for  public  sale in the
United  States  without first being  registered  under the 1933 Act. An illiquid
investment is any investment that cannot be disposed of within seven days in the
normal course of business at  approximately  the amount at which it is valued by
the Portfolio.  The price the Portfolio pays for illiquid securities or receives
upon resale may be lower than the price paid or received for similar  securities
with a more liquid market.  Accordingly  the valuation of these  securities will
reflect any limitations on their liquidity.




<PAGE>


                                      A-8



         The  Portfolio  may  also  purchase  Rule  144A   securities   sold  to
institutional   investors  without   registration  under  the  1933  Act.  These
securities  may  be  determined  to be  liquid  in  accordance  with  guidelines
established  by the Advisor and  approved by the  Trustees.  The  Trustees  will
monitor the Advisor's implementation of these guidelines on a periodic basis.


         FUTURES AND OPTIONS TRANSACTIONS

         The  Portfolio  is  permitted  to enter into the  futures  and  options
transactions  described below for hedging and risk management  purposes,  but it
does not currently intend to do so.

         The  Portfolio   may  (a)  purchase  and  sell   exchange   traded  and
over-the-counter  ("OTC") put and call  options on fixed income  securities  and
indexes of fixed income  securities,  (b) purchase and sell futures contracts on
fixed income  securities and indexes of fixed income securities and (c) purchase
and sell put and call options on futures  contracts  on fixed income  securities
and indexes of fixed income securities.

         The  Portfolio  may use futures  contracts  and options for hedging and
risk  management  purposes.  See  Item 13 in Part B. The  Portfolio  may not use
futures contracts and options for speculation.

         The Portfolio may utilize  options and futures  contracts to manage its
exposure to changing  interest rates and/or  security  prices.  Some options and
futures strategies, including selling futures contracts and buying puts, tend to
hedge the Portfolio's investments against price fluctuations.  Other strategies,
including  buying futures  contracts,  writing puts and calls, and buying calls,
tend to increase market exposure.  Options and futures contracts may be combined
with each other or with forward contracts in order to adjust the risk and return
characteristics  of  the  Portfolio's   overall  strategy  in  a  manner  deemed
appropriate to the Advisor and  consistent  with the  Portfolio's  objective and
policies.  Because combined  options  positions  involve  multiple trades,  they
result in higher  transaction  costs and may be more difficult to open and close
out.

         The use of options and futures is a highly  specialized  activity which
involves  investment  strategies and risks different from those  associated with
ordinary portfolio securities  transactions,  and there can be no guarantee that
their  use  will  increase  the  Portfolio's  return.  While  the  use of  these
instruments by the Portfolio may reduce certain risks associated with owning its
portfolio securities, these techniques themselves entail certain other risks. If
the  Advisor  applies a  strategy  at an  inappropriate  time or  judges  market
conditions or trends  incorrectly,  options and futures strategies may lower the
Portfolio's  return.  Certain strategies limit the Portfolio's  possibilities to
realize gains as well as limiting its exposure to losses.  The  Portfolio  could
also experience losses if the


<PAGE>


                                      A-9


prices of its options  and futures  positions  were poorly  correlated  with its
other  investments,  or if it could not close out its  positions  because  of an
illiquid  secondary  market.  In addition,  the Portfolio will incur transaction
costs, including trading commissions and option premiums, in connection with its
futures and options  transactions  and these  transactions  could  significantly
increase the Portfolio's turnover rate.


         The  Portfolio may purchase and sell put and call options on securities
and indexes of securities, or futures contracts or options on futures contracts,
if such options are written by other persons and if (i) the  aggregate  premiums
paid on all such  options  which are held at any time to not  exceed  20% of the
Portfolio's net assets,  and (ii) the aggregate margin deposits  required on all
such  futures  or  options  thereon  held at any  time to not  exceed  5% of the
Portfolio's assets. In addition, the Portfolio will not purchase or sell (write)
futures  contracts,  options on futures  contracts or commodity options for risk
management  purposes if, as a result,  the aggregate  initial margin and options
premiums  required to establish these positions exceed 5% of the net asset value
of the Portfolio.


OPTIONS

         PURCHASING  PUT AND CALL  OPTIONS.  By  purchasing  a put  option,  the
Portfolio  obtains  the right (but not the  obligation)  to sell the  instrument
underlying  the option at a fixed strike  price.  In return for this right,  the
Portfolio  pays the  current  market  price for the option  (known as the option
premium).  Options  have  various  types of  underlying  instruments,  including
specific  securities,  indexes of securities,  indexes of securities prices, and
futures  contracts.  The Portfolio may terminate its position in a put option it
has  purchased  by  allowing  it to  expire or by  exercising  the  option.  The
Portfolio  may  also  close  out a put  option  position  by  entering  into  an
offsetting  transaction,  if a liquid market exists. If the option is allowed to
expire,  the  Portfolio  will lose the entire  premium it paid. If the Portfolio
exercises a put option on a security, it will sell the instrument underlying the
option at the strike price.  If the  Portfolio  exercises an option on an index,
settlement is in cash and does not involve the actual sale of securities.  If an
option is American  style,  it may be exercised on any day up to its  expiration
date. A European style option may be exercised only on its expiration date.

         The buyer of a typical  put  option can expect to realize a gain if the
price of the underlying instrument falls substantially. However, if the price of
the instrument  underlying the option does not fall enough to offset the cost of
purchasing  the option,  a put buyer can expect to suffer a loss (limited to the
amount of the premium paid, plus related transaction costs).

         The features of call options are essentially the same as


<PAGE>


                                      A-10


those of put options,  except that the  purchaser  of a call option  obtains the
right to purchase, rather than sell, the instrument underlying the option at the
option's  strike  price.  A call buyer  typically  attempts  to  participate  in
potential  price  increases of the  instrument  underlying  the option with risk
limited to the cost of the option if security prices fall. At the same time, the
buyer can expect to suffer a loss if security prices do not rise sufficiently to
offset the cost of the option.

         SELLING (WRITING) PUT AND CALL OPTIONS. When the Portfolio writes a put
option,  it  takes  the  opposite  side of the  transaction  from  the  option's
purchaser.  In return for  receipt of the  premium,  the  Portfolio  assumes the
obligation to pay the strike price for the  instrument  underlying the option if
the other party to the option  chooses to exercise it. The Portfolio may seek to
terminate its position in a put option it writes  before  exercise by purchasing
an offsetting  option in the market at its current  price.  If the market is not
liquid for a put option the Portfolio has written,  however,  the Portfolio must
continue to be prepared to pay the strike price while the option is outstanding,
regardless  of price  changes,  and must  continue to post  margin as  discussed
below.

         If the price of the  underlying  instrument  rises,  a put writer would
generally expect to profit,  although its gain would be limited to the amount of
the premium it received.  If security  prices  remain the same over time,  it is
likely that the writer will also profit,  because it should be able to close out
the option at a lower  price.  If security  prices  fall,  the put writer  would
expect to suffer a loss.  This loss should be less than the loss from purchasing
and holding the underlying  instrument  directly,  however,  because the premium
received for writing the option should offset a portion of the decline.

         Writing a call option  obligates  the  Portfolio to sell or deliver the
option's  underlying  instrument in return for the strike price upon exercise of
the option. The  characteristics of writing call options are similar to those of
writing put  options,  except  that  writing  calls  generally  is a  profitable
strategy  if prices  remain  the same or fall.  Through  receipt  of the  option
premium a call writer offsets part of the effect of a price decline. At the same
time,  because  a call  writer  must  be  prepared  to  deliver  the  underlying
instrument in return for the strike price, even if its current value is greater,
a call writer gives up some ability to participate in security price increases.

         The writer of an exchange-traded  put or call option on a security,  an
index of  securities  or a futures  contract  is  required  to  deposit  cash or
securities  or a letter of credit as margin and to make mark to market  payments
of variation margin as the position becomes unprofitable.

         OPTIONS ON INDEXES.  The  Portfolio  may purchase and sell put and call
options and sell (write) covered put and call options on


<PAGE>


                                      A-11


any  securities  index based on  securities  in which the  Portfolio may invest.
Options on securities indexes are similar to options on securities,  except that
the exercise of securities index options is settled by cash payment and does not
involve the actual  purchase or sale of securities.  In addition,  these options
are designed to reflect price  fluctuations  in a group of securities or segment
of the securities  market rather than price  fluctuations in a single  security.
The Portfolio,  in purchasing or selling index  options,  is subject to the risk
that the value of its  portfolio  securities  may not change as much as an index
because the Portfolio's  investments generally will not match the composition of
an index.

         For a number of  reasons,  a liquid  market  may not exist and thus the
Portfolio may not be able to close out an option position that it has previously
entered into. When the Portfolio  purchases an OTC option, it will be relying on
its  counterparty  to  perform  its  obligations,  and the  Portfolio  may incur
additional losses if the counterparty is unable to perform.

FUTURES CONTRACTS

         When the Portfolio purchases a futures contract,  it agrees to purchase
a specified  quantity of an underlying  instrument at a specified future date or
to make a cash  payment  based on the  value  of a  securities  index.  When the
Portfolio sells a futures  contract,  it agrees to sell a specified  quantity of
the  underlying  instrument  at a  specified  future  date or to  receive a cash
payment  based on the  value  of a  securities  index.  The  price at which  the
purchase  and sale will take place is fixed when the  Portfolio  enters into the
contract.  Futures can be held until their delivery dates or the position can be
(and normally is) closed out before then. There is no assurance, however, that a
liquid  market will exist when the  Portfolio  wishes to close out a  particular
position.

         When the  Portfolio  purchases  a  futures  contract,  the value of the
futures  contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of its
underlying  instrument.  Therefore,  purchasing  futures  contracts will tend to
increase the Portfolio's exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in
the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying instrument
directly. When the Portfolio sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of
its futures  position will tend to move in a direction  contrary to the value of
the underlying instrument.  Selling futures contracts,  therefore,  will tend to
offset  both  positive  and  negative  market  price  changes,  much  as if  the
underlying instrument had been sold.

         The  purchaser  or seller  of a futures  contract  is not  required  to
deliver or pay for the underlying  instrument  unless the contract is held until
the delivery date. However,  when the Portfolio buys or sells a futures contract
it will be  required  to  deposit  "initial  margin"  with  the  Custodian  in a
segregated


<PAGE>


                                      A-12


account  in the  name of its  futures  broker,  known  as a  futures  commission
merchant  ("FCM").  Initial  margin  deposits  are  typically  equal  to a small
percentage of the  contract's  value.  If the value of either  party's  position
declines,  that party will be required  to make  additional  "variation  margin"
payments  equal to the  change in value on a daily  basis.  The party that has a
gain may be entitled to receive all or a portion of this amount.  The  Portfolio
may be  obligated  to make  payments  of  variation  margin at a time when it is
disadvantageous  to do so.  Furthermore,  it may not always be possible  for the
Portfolio  to close out its  futures  positions.  Until it closes  out a futures
position,  the Portfolio will be obligated to continue to pay variation  margin.
Initial and variation margin payments do not constitute purchasing on margin for
purposes  of  the  Portfolio's  investment  restrictions.  In the  event  of the
bankruptcy of an FCM that holds margin on behalf of the Portfolio, the Portfolio
may be entitled to return of margin owed to it only in  proportion to the amount
received by the FCM's other  customers,  potentially  resulting in losses to the
Portfolio.

         The Portfolio will segregate liquid,  high quality assets in connection
with its use of options  and  futures  contracts  to the extent  required by the
staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Securities held in a segregated
account  cannot be sold while the  futures  contract  or option is  outstanding,
unless they are replaced with other  suitable  assets.  As a result,  there is a
possibility  that  segregation of a large  percentage of the Portfolio's  assets
could impede portfolio  management or the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption
requests or other current obligations.

         For  further  information  about the  Portfolio's  use of  futures  and
options and a more  detailed  discussion of associated  risks,  see  "Investment
Objectives and Policies" in Part B.

INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS


         To allow investors in the Portfolio to qualify as regulated  investment
companies under  Subchapter M of the Code, the Portfolio  limits its investments
so that at the close of each quarter of its taxable year (a) no more than 25% of
its total  assets are  invested  in the  securities  of any one  issuer,  except
government securities,  and (b) with regard to 50% of total assets, no more than
5% of total assets are invested in the  securities  of a single  issuer,  except
government securities.


         The investment objective of the Portfolio, together with the investment
restrictions  described  below  and in Part  B,  except  as  noted,  are  deemed
fundamental  policies,  i.e.,  they may be changed only with the approval of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Portfolio.

         The Portfolio  may not (i) borrow money,  except that the Portfolio may
(a) borrow money from banks for temporary or


<PAGE>


                                      A-13



emergency  purposes  (not for  leveraging  purposes)  and (b) enter into reverse
repurchase agreements for any purpose; provided that (a) and (b) in total do not
exceed 33 1/3% of the  value of the  Portfolio's  total  assets  (including  the
amount  borrowed)  less  liabilities  (other  than  borrowings).  If at any time
borrowings come to exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the Portfolio's  total assets,
the  Portfolio  will reduce its  borrowings  within three  business  days to the
extent  necessary  to comply with the 33 1/3%  limitation;  or (ii) issue senior
securities  except  as  permitted  by  the  1940  Act  or  any  rule,  order  or
interpretation  thereunder.  See  "Additional  Investment  Information  and Risk
Factors -- Loans of Portfolio Securities" and "Additional Investment Information
and Risk Factors -- Reverse Repurchase Agreements."


         For a more detailed discussion of the above investment restrictions, as
well as a description of certain other investment  restrictions,  see Item 13 in
Part B.


ITEM 5.  MANAGEMENT OF THE  PORTFOLIO.


         The Board of Trustees  provides broad  supervision  over the affairs of
the  Portfolio.  The Portfolio  has retained the services of Morgan  Guaranty as
investment  adviser.  The  Portfolio  has  retained  the  services of  Signature
Broker-Dealer Services, Inc. ("SBDS") as administrator (the "Administrator").

         The Portfolio has not retained the services of a principal  underwriter
or  distributor,  since interests in the Portfolio are offered solely in private
placement  transactions.  SBDS,  acting  as agent for the  Portfolio,  serves as
exclusive  placement  agent of  interests  in the  Portfolio.  SBDS  receives no
additional  compensation  for  serving  as  exclusive  placement  agent  to  the
Portfolio.

         The Portfolio has entered into a Fund Services  Agreement with Pierpont
Group,  Inc. to assist the  Trustees in  exercising  their  overall  supervisory
responsibilities  for the  Portfolio's  affairs.  The fees to be paid under this
agreement  approximate the reasonable cost of Pierpont Group,  Inc. in providing
these services. Pierpont Group, Inc. was organized in 1989 at the request of the
Trustees of The Pierpont Funds  (currently an investor in the Portfolio) for the
purpose of providing these services at cost to The Pierpont  Funds.  See Item 14
in Part B. The  principal  offices of Pierpont  Group,  Inc.  are located at 461
Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10017.

         INVESTMENT ADVISOR.  Morgan Guaranty, with principal offices at 60 Wall
Street,  New York, New York 10260,  is a New York trust company which conducts a
general banking and trust business. Morgan Guaranty is a wholly owned subsidiary
of J.P  Morgan  & Co.  Incorporated  ("J.P.  Morgan"),  a bank  holding  company
organized  under  the laws of  Delaware.  Through  offices  in New York City and
abroad, J.P. Morgan,  through the Advisor and other subsidiaries,  offers a wide
range of services to governmental, institutional,


<PAGE>


                                      A-14



corporate and individual  customers and acts as investment adviser to individual
and  institutional  clients with combined  assets under  management of over $145
billion  (of  which the  Advisor  advises  over $30  billion).  Morgan  Guaranty
provides  investment advice and portfolio  management services to the Portfolio.
Subject to the  supervision of the Portfolio's  Trustees,  Morgan Guaranty makes
the Portfolio's  day-to-day investment decisions,  arranges for the execution of
portfolio transactions and generally manages the Portfolio's investments.

See Item 16 in Part B.


         The Advisor uses a sophisticated,  disciplined,  collaborative  process
for  managing  all asset  classes.  For fixed  income  portfolios,  this process
focuses  on  the   systematic   analysis   of  real   interest   rates,   sector
diversification  and  quantitative  and credit  analysis.  Morgan  Guaranty  has
managed  portfolios of domestic fixed income securities on behalf of its clients
for over 50 years. The Portfolio  managers making  investments in domestic fixed
income securities work in conjunction with fixed income,  credit, capital market
and economic research analysts, as well as traders and administrative officers.

         The following  persons are  primarily  responsible  for the  day-to-day
management and  implementation  of Morgan  Guaranty's  process for the Portfolio
(the inception date of each person's responsibility for the Portfolio and his or
her business experience for the past five years are indicated  parenthetically):
Elbridge T. Gerry III, Vice  President  (since April,  1994;  employed by Morgan
Guaranty since prior to 1989) and Elizabeth A. Augustin,  Vice President  (since
April, 1994; employed by Morgan Guaranty since prior to 1989).


         As compensation for the services rendered and related expenses borne by
Morgan Guaranty under the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Portfolio,  the
Portfolio  has agreed to pay Morgan  Guaranty a fee which is computed  daily and
may be paid monthly at the annual rate of 0.30% of the Portfolio's average daily
net assets.

         Morgan  Guaranty  also acts as  Services  Agent to the  Portfolio.  See
"Services Agent" below.

         ADMINISTRATOR.  Under an  Administration  Agreement with the Portfolio,
SBDS  serves  as the  Administrator  for  the  Portfolio  and in  that  capacity
supervises the Portfolio's  day-to-day  operations  other than management of the
Portfolio's  investments.  In this capacity,  SBDS  administers  and manages all
aspects of the Portfolio's  day-to-day  operations subject to the supervision of
the Trustees,  except as set forth under "Investment  Advisor," "Services Agent"
and "Custodian." In connection with its responsibilities as Administrator,  SBDS
(i) furnishes  ordinary clerical and related services for day-to-day  operations
including


<PAGE>


                                      A-15



certain recordkeeping responsibilities; (ii) takes responsibility for compliance
with  all  applicable   federal  and  state   securities  and  other  regulatory
requirements; and (iii) performs such administrative and managerial oversight of
the activities of the  Portfolio's  custodian and transfer agent as the Trustees
may direct from time to time.  Under the terms of the Portfolio's  Financial and
Fund  Accounting  Services  Agreement  with  Morgan  Guaranty,  the  fees of the
Administrator are covered by Morgan  Guaranty's  expense  undertaking  described
under "Services Agent" below.

         Under   the   Portfolio's    Administration   Agreement,   the   annual
administration  fee rate is calculated based on the aggregate  average daily net
assets of the  Portfolio,  as well as all of the other  portfolios  (the "Master
Funds") in which series of The Pierpont Funds,  The JPM  Institutional  Funds or
The JPM Advisor  Funds invest.  The fee is  calculated  in  accordance  with the
following  schedule:  0.010%  of the  first  $1  billion  of  these  portfolios'
aggregate  average  daily net  assets,  0.008% of the next $2  billion  of these
portfolios' aggregate average daily net assets, 0.006% of the next $2 billion of
these  portfolios'  aggregate  average  daily net  assets,  and  0.004% of these
portfolios' aggregate average daily net assets in excess of $5 billion. This fee
is then applied to the net assets of the  Portfolio  and the Master  Funds.  The
Administrator may voluntarily waive a portion of its fees.

         SBDS,  a  registered  broker-dealer,   also  serves  as  the  exclusive
placement  agent  for  the  Portfolio.  SBDS is a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of
Signature  Financial  Group,  Inc.  ("Signature").  Signature and its affiliates
currently  provide  administration  and  distribution  services  for a number of
registered  investment  companies  through offices located in Boston,  New York,
London,  Toronto and George Town, Grand Cayman . The principal  business address
of SBDS is 6 St. James Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.

        SERVICES  AGENT.  Under  a  Financial  and  Fund  Accounting   Services
Agreement (the "Services Agreement") with the Portfolio, Morgan Guaranty acts as
Services  Agent to the  Portfolio  and  provides the  following  services to the
Portfolio.  The Services  Agreement provides that Morgan Guaranty is responsible
for certain  financial and fund accounting  services  provided to the Portfolio,
including services related to tax returns and financial reports. The services to
be provided by Morgan Guaranty under the Services Agreement include, but are not
limited to,  assisting the  Administrator  in preparing  tax returns,  reviewing
financial reports,  coordinating annual audits,  assisting in the development of
budgets, and overseeing preparation of tax information for investors; monitoring
the fund accounting activities and daily partnership allocation calculation; and
providing other related services.

          In addition, as provided in the Services



<PAGE>


                                      A-16



Agreement,  Morgan Guaranty is responsible for the annual costs of certain usual
and customary  expenses  incurred by the Portfolio (the "Expense  Undertaking").
The expenses covered by the Expense Undertaking include, but are not limited to,
transfer  and  registrar  costs,  legal  and  accounting  expenses,  fees of the
Administrator,  insurance,  the compensation  and expenses of the Trustees,  the
expenses of printing  and  mailing  reports,  notices,  and other  materials  to
investors,  and  registration  fees under federal or state  securities laws. The
Portfolio  will pay these  expenses  directly  and such amounts will be deducted
from the fees to be paid to Morgan  Guaranty  under the Services  Agreement.  If
such  amounts  are more  than the  amount of Morgan  Guaranty's  fees  under the
Services Agreement, Morgan Guaranty will reimburse the Portfolio for such excess
amounts.  Under the Services Agreement,  the following expenses are not included
in the Expense  Undertaking:  custodian fees, advisory fees, brokerage expenses,
the services  agent fee,  organization  expenses and  extraordinary  expenses as
defined in the Services Agreement.


         The  Services  Agreement  provides  for  the  Portfolio  to pay  Morgan
Guaranty  a fee for  these  services  which is  computed  daily  and may be paid
monthly  at the  annual  rate of 0.10% of the  average  daily net  assets of the
Portfolio up to $200 million, 0.05% on the next $200 million of such assets, and
0.03% of such assets thereafter.


         As noted  above,  the fee level of the  Portfolio  includes the Expense
Undertaking  and  reflects  payments  made  directly  to  third  parties  by the
Portfolio  for  services  rendered,  as well as payments to Morgan  Guaranty for
services  rendered.  The Trustees regularly review amounts paid to and accounted
for by Morgan Guaranty  pursuant to the Services  Agreement.  Under the Services
Agreement,  Morgan Guaranty may delegate one or more of its  responsibilities to
other entities, including SBDS, at Morgan Guaranty's expense.


         CUSTODIAN.  State Street Bank and Trust  Company,  40 King Street West,
Toronto,  Ontario,  Canada  M5H 3Y8  serves  as the  Portfolio's  custodian  and
transfer agent (the "Custodian").

ITEM 6.  CAPITAL STOCK AND OTHER SECURITIES.

         The  Portfolio  is  organized as a trust under the laws of the State of
New York.  Under the Declaration of Trust,  the Trustees are authorized to issue
beneficial  interests in the  Portfolio.  Each investor is entitled to a vote in
proportion to the amount of its investment in the Portfolio.  Investments in the
Portfolio  may not be  transferred,  but an  investor  may  withdraw  all or any
portion  of its  investment  at any time at net asset  value.  Investors  in the
Portfolio (e.g.,  investment companies,  insurance company separate accounts and
common and  commingled  trust funds) will each be liable for all  obligations of
the  Portfolio.  However,  the risk of an  investor in the  Portfolio  incurring
financial loss on account of such liability is limited to circumstances in which
both inadequate insurance existed and the


<PAGE>


                                      A-17


Portfolio itself was unable to meet its obligations.

         Investments  in the Portfolio  have no preemptive or conversion  rights
and are fully paid and  nonassessable,  except as set forth below. The Portfolio
is not  required  and has no current  intention  of holding  annual  meetings of
investors, but the Portfolio will hold special meetings of investors when in the
judgment of the Trustees it is  necessary or desirable to submit  matters for an
investor vote.  Changes in  fundamental  policies will be submitted to investors
for approval. Investors have under certain circumstances (e.g., upon application
and  submission  of certain  specified  documents to the Trustees by a specified
percentage  of  the  outstanding  interests  in  the  Portfolio)  the  right  to
communicate  with other  investors in  connection  with  requesting a meeting of
investors for the purpose of removing one or more Trustees.  Investors also have
the right to remove one or more Trustees  without a meeting by a declaration  in
writing by a specified percentage of the outstanding interests in the Portfolio.
Upon liquidation of the Portfolio, investors would be entitled to share pro rata
in the net assets of the Portfolio available for distribution to investors.

         The net asset value of the  Portfolio is  determined  each business day
other  than the  holidays  listed in Part B  ("Portfolio  Business  Day").  This
determination is made once each Portfolio  Business Day as of 4:00 p.m. New York
time (the "Valuation Time").

         The "net  income"  of the  Portfolio  will  consist  of (i) all  income
accrued,  less the amortization of any premium,  on the assets of the Portfolio,
less (ii) all  actual  and  accrued  expenses  of the  Portfolio  determined  in
accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles.  Interest  income
includes  discount earned (including both original issue and market discount) on
discount  paper  accrued  ratably to the date of maturity  and any net  realized
gains or  losses  on the  assets  of the  Portfolio.  All the net  income of the
Portfolio is allocated pro rata among the investors in the Portfolio.

         The end of the Portfolio's fiscal year is March 31.

         Under  the  anticipated  method  of  operation  of the  Portfolio,  the
Portfolio will not be subject to any income tax.  However,  each investor in the
Portfolio  will be taxable on its share (as  determined in  accordance  with the
governing  instruments of the Portfolio) of the Portfolio's  ordinary income and
capital gain in determining its income tax liability.  The determination of such
share will be made in  accordance  with the Internal  Revenue  Code of 1986,  as
amended (the "Code"), and regulations promulgated thereunder.

         It is intended that the Portfolio's  assets,  income and  distributions
will be managed in such a way that an investor in the Portfolio  will be able to
satisfy the requirements of


<PAGE>


                                      A-18


Subchapter M of the Code,  assuming that the investor invested all of its assets
in the Portfolio.

         Investor  inquiries  may be  directed  to SBDS at 6 St.  James  Avenue,
Boston, Massachusetts 02116 (617) 423-0800.

ITEM 7.  PURCHASE OF SECURITIES.


         Beneficial  interests  in the  Portfolio  are issued  solely in private
placement  transactions  that do not involve any  "public  offering"  within the
meaning of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.  Investments  in the Portfolio may only
be made by other investment  companies,  insurance  company  separate  accounts,
common or commingled trust funds, or similar organizations or entities which are
"accredited  investors"  as  defined  in Rule  501  under  the  1933  Act.  This
Registration Statement does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation
of an offer to buy, any "security" within the meaning of the 1933 Act.


         An investment  in the  Portfolio may be made without a sales load.  All
investments  are  made at net  asset  value  next  determined  after an order is
received in "good order" by the Portfolio.  The net asset value of the Portfolio
is determined on each Portfolio Business Day.

         There is no minimum initial or subsequent  investment in the Portfolio.
However,  because the Portfolio  intends to be as fully invested at all times as
is  reasonably  practicable  in  order  to  enhance  the  yield  on its  assets,
investments must be made in federal funds (i.e.,  monies credited to the account
of the Custodian by a Federal Reserve Bank).

         The Portfolio and SBDS reserve the right to cease accepting investments
at any time or to reject any investment order.

         Each investor in the  Portfolio may add to or reduce its  investment in
the Portfolio on each Portfolio Business Day. At the Valuation Time on each such
day, the value of each investor's  beneficial  interest in the Portfolio will be
determined  by  multiplying  the  net  asset  value  of  the  Portfolio  by  the
percentage,  effective for that day, which  represents that investor's  share of
the  aggregate  beneficial   interests  in  the  Portfolio.   Any  additions  or
reductions,  which are to be effected as the  Valuation  Time on such day,  will
then  be  effected.  The  investor's  percentage  of  the  aggregate  beneficial
interests in the Portfolio  will then be recomputed as the  percentage  equal to
the  fraction  (i) the  numerator  of  which  is the  value  of such  investor's
investment in the Portfolio as of the Valuation  Time on such day plus or minus,
as the  case  may be,  the  amount  of net  additions  to or  reductions  in the
investor's  investment in the Portfolio  effected as of the Valuation  Time, and
(ii) the  denominator of which is the aggregate net asset value of the Portfolio
as of the  Valuation  Time on such day,  plus or minus,  as the case may be, the
amount of net additions to or reductions in


<PAGE>


                                      A-19


the aggregate  investments  in the Portfolio by all investors in the  Portfolio.
The percentage so determined  will then be applied to determine the value of the
investor's  interest in the Portfolio as of the Valuation  Time on the following
Portfolio Business Day.

ITEM 8.  REDEMPTION OR REPURCHASE.

         An  investor  in the  Portfolio  may reduce  all or any  portion of its
investment  at the net asset  value  next  determined  after a request  in "good
order"  is  furnished  by the  investor  to the  Portfolio.  The  proceeds  of a
reduction  will be paid by the Portfolio in federal  funds  normally on the next
Portfolio Business Day after the reduction is effected,  but in any event within
seven days. Investments in the Portfolio may not be transferred.

         The right of any  investor  to  receive  payment  with  respect  to any
reduction  may be suspended or the payment of the proceeds  therefrom  postponed
during any period in which the New York Stock  Exchange  (the  "NYSE") is closed
(other than  weekends or holidays) or trading on the NYSE is  restricted  or, to
the extent otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act, if an emergency exists.

         The Portfolio reserves the right under certain  circumstances,  such as
accommodating  requests for  substantial  withdrawals  or  liquidations,  to pay
distributions in kind to investors (i.e., to distribute  portfolio securities as
opposed to cash).  If  securities  are  distributed,  an  investor  could  incur
brokerage,  tax or other  charges  in  converting  the  securities  to cash.  In
addition,  distribution  in kind may result in a less  diversified  portfolio of
investments or adversely affect the liquidity of the Portfolio or the investor's
portfolio, as the case may be.

ITEM 9.  PENDING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

         Not applicable.


<PAGE>




 JPM437



                                     PART B


ITEM 10.  COVER PAGE.

         Not applicable.

ITEM 11.  TABLE OF CONTENTS.                                   PAGE


         General Information and History . . . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Investment Objectives and Policies  . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Management of the Portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Control Persons and Principal Holder
         of Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Investment Advisory and Other Services  . . . . . . .  B-
         Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices  . . . . . .  B-
         Capital Stock and Other Securities  . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Purchase, Redemption and Pricing of
         Securities Being Offered  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Tax Status  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Underwriters  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Calculations of Performance Data  . . . . . . . . . .  B-
         Financial Statements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  B-


ITEM 12.  GENERAL INFORMATION AND HISTORY.

         Not applicable.

ITEM 13.  INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES.

         The  investment  objective of The New York Total Return Bond  Portfolio
(the  "Portfolio")  is to provide a high after tax total return  consistent with
moderate risk of capital. Total return will consist of income plus capital gains
and  losses.  The  Portfolio  attempts to achieve its  investment  objective  by
investing  primarily  in municipal  securities  issued by New York State and its
political subdivisions and by agencies, authorities and instrumentalities of New
York and its political subdivisions.

 These  securities  earn income exempt from federal and New York State and local
income  taxes but,  in  certain  circumstances,  may be  subject to  alternative
minimum  tax. In addition,  the  Portfolio  may invest in  municipal  securities
issued by states other than New York,  by  territories  and  possessions  of the
United States and by the District of Columbia and their political  subdivisions,
agencies and instrumentalities. These securities earn income exempt from federal
income  taxes but,  in  certain  circumstances,  may be  subject to  alternative
minimum tax. The  Portfolio is advised by Morgan  Guaranty  Trust Company of New
York  ("Morgan  Guaranty"  or the  "Advisor").  In order to seek to enhance  the
Portfolio's after tax return, the Portfolio



<PAGE>


                                      B-2


may also  invest in  securities  which earn  income  subject to New York  and/or
federal  income taxes.  These  securities  include U.S.  government  securities,
corporate securities and municipal securities issued on a taxable basis.

         The following  discussion  supplements  the  information  regarding the
investment objective of the Portfolio and the policies to be employed to achieve
this objective as set forth above and in Part A.

MONEY MARKET INSTRUMENTS

         As  discussed  in Part A, the  Portfolio  may  invest  in money  market
instruments to the extent consistent with its investment objective and policies.
A  description  of the various  types of money  market  instruments  that may be
purchased by the  Portfolio  appears  below.  See  "Quality and  Diversification
Requirements" below.

 

         U.S.   TREASURY   SECURITIES.   The  Portfolio  may  invest  in  direct
obligations of the U.S. Treasury, including Treasury bills, notes and bonds, all
of which are backed as to principal and interest  payments by the full faith and
credit of the United States.
 

         ADDITIONAL  U.S.  GOVERNMENT  OBLIGATIONS.  The Portfolio may invest in
obligations   issued   or   guaranteed   by   U.S.    Government   agencies   or
instrumentalities. These obligations may or may not be backed by the "full faith
and credit" of the United  States.  In the case of securities  not backed by the
full faith and credit of the United States,  the Portfolio must look principally
to the federal  agency  issuing or  guaranteeing  the  obligation  for  ultimate
repayment and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself
in the  event  the  agency  or  instrumentality  does not meet its  commitments.
Securities  in which the  Portfolio  may invest  that are not backed by the full
faith  and  credit  of the  United  States  include,  but  are not  limited  to,
obligations of the Tennessee Valley  Authority,  the Federal  National  Mortgage
Association,  and the U.S. Postal Service, each of which has the right to borrow
from the U.S.  Treasury to meet its obligations,  and obligations of the Federal
Farm Credit  System and the Federal Home Loan Banks,  both of whose  obligations
may be  satisfied  only  by the  individual  credits  of  each  issuing  agency.
Securities  which are backed by the full  faith and credit of the United  States
include obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association, the Farmers
Home Administration, and the Export-Import Bank.

         BANK  OBLIGATIONS.  The Portfolio,  unless otherwise noted in Part A or
below,  may invest in  negotiable  certificates  of deposit,  time  deposits and
bankers'  acceptances of (i) banks,  savings and loan  associations  and savings
banks which have more than $2 billion in total  assets and are  organized  under
the laws of the United States or any state, (ii) foreign branches of these


<PAGE>


                                      B-3


banks of  equivalent  size (Euros) and (iii) U.S.  branches of foreign  banks of
equivalent  size  (Yankees).  The  Portfolio  may not invest in  obligations  of
foreign  branches of foreign banks. The Portfolio will not invest in obligations
for which the Advisor, or any of its affiliated persons, is the ultimate obligor
or accepting bank.

         COMMERCIAL  PAPER.  The  Portfolio  may  invest  in  commercial  paper,
including master demand  obligations.  Master demand obligations are obligations
that  provide for a periodic  adjustment  in the  interest  rate paid and permit
daily changes in the amount borrowed.  Master demand obligations are governed by
agreements  between  the  issuer  and Morgan  Guaranty  acting as agent,  for no
additional  fee, in its capacity as investment  advisor to the Portfolios and as
fiduciary for other  clients for whom it exercises  investment  discretion.  The
monies loaned to the borrower  come from accounts  managed by the Advisor or its
affiliates,  pursuant to arrangements with such accounts. Interest and principal
payments are credited to such  accounts.  The Advisor,  acting as a fiduciary on
behalf of its clients, has the right to increase or decrease the amount provided
to the borrower under an  obligation.  The borrower has the right to pay without
penalty  all  or any  part  of  the  principal  amount  then  outstanding  on an
obligation  together  with  interest  to  the  date  of  payment.   Since  these
obligations  typically  provide that the  interest  rate is tied to the Treasury
Bill auction rate,  the rate on master demand  obligations is subject to change.
Repayment of a master demand obligation to participating accounts depends on the
ability  of the  borrower  to pay the  accrued  interest  and  principal  of the
obligation on demand which is continuously monitored by the Portfolios' Advisor.
Since  master  demand  obligations  typically  are not  rated by  credit  rating
agencies,  the Portfolio may invest in such unrated  obligations  only if at the
time of an  investment  the  obligation  is  determined by the Advisor to have a
credit  quality  which  satisfies  the  Portfolio's  quality  restrictions.  See
"Quality and Diversification Requirements" below. Although there is no secondary
market for master demand  obligations,  such  obligations  are considered by the
Portfolio to be liquid because they are payable upon demand.  The Portfolio does
not have any specific  percentage  limitation  on  investments  in master demand
obligations.

         REPURCHASE   AGREEMENTS.   The  Portfolio  may  enter  into  repurchase
agreements  with  brokers,  dealers  or banks  that meet the  credit  guidelines
approved by the  Trustees.  In a  repurchase  agreement,  the  Portfolio  buys a
security  from a seller  that has agreed to  repurchase  the same  security at a
mutually  agreed upon date and price.  The resale price normally is in excess of
the purchase price,  reflecting an agreed upon interest rate. This interest rate
is effective  for the period of time the  Portfolio is invested in the agreement
and is not related to the coupon rate on the underlying  security.  A repurchase
agreement  may also be  viewed  as a fully  collateralized  loan of money by the
Portfolio to the seller. The period of these repurchase


<PAGE>


                                      B-4


agreements  will usually be short,  from  overnight to one week,  and at no time
will the Portfolio invest in repurchase  agreements for more than 13 months. The
securities  which  are  subject  to  repurchase  agreements,  however,  may have
maturity  dates in excess of 13 months from the effective date of the repurchase
agreement.

 The Portfolio will always receive  securities as collateral  whose market value
is, and during the entire term of the agreement remains,  at least equal to 100%
of the dollar amount  invested by the Portfolio in each  agreement  plus accrued
interest,  and the  Portfolio  will make payment for such  securities  only upon
physical  delivery or upon evidence of book entry transfer to the account of the
Portfolio's custodian (the "Custodian").

 If the seller  defaults,  the Portfolio  might incur a loss if the value of the
collateral   securing  the  repurchase   agreement   declines  and  might  incur
disposition costs in connection with liquidating the collateral. In addition, if
bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with respect to the seller of the security,
realization upon the collateral by the Portfolio may be delayed or limited.

         The  Portfolio  may make  investments  in other  debt  securities  with
remaining  effective  maturities of not more than 13 months,  including  without
limitation  corporate  and  foreign  bonds,  asset-backed  securities  and other
obligations  described in Part A or this Part B. The Portfolio may not invest in
foreign bonds or asset-backed securities.

TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS

         As  discussed  in  Part A,  the  Portfolio  may  invest  in tax  exempt
obligations to the extent consistent with the Portfolio's  investment  objective
and policies. A description of the various types of tax exempt obligations which
may be purchased by the Portfolio  appears in Part A and below. See "Quality and
Diversification Requirements" below.

         MUNICIPAL  BONDS.  Municipal bonds are debt  obligations  issued by the
states,  territories  and  possessions  of the United States and the District of
Columbia,  by their political  subdivisions and by duly constituted  authorities
and   corporations.   For  example,   states,   territories,   possessions   and
municipalities  may issue  municipal  bonds to raise  funds for  various  public
purposes such as airports,  housing,  hospitals,  mass transportation,  schools,
water and sewer works. They may also issue municipal bonds to refund outstanding
obligations and to meet general  operating  expenses.  Public  authorities issue
municipal  bonds to obtain funding for privately  operated  facilities,  such as
housing and pollution control facilities, for industrial facilities or for water
supply, gas, electricity or waste disposal facilities.

         Municipal  bonds may be general  obligation or revenue  bonds.  General
obligation  bonds are secured by the issuer's  pledge of its full faith,  credit
and taxing power for the payment of


<PAGE>


                                      B-5


principal  and interest.  Revenue  bonds are payable from revenues  derived from
particular  facilities,  from the proceeds of a special excise tax or from other
specific revenue sources. They are not generally payable from the general taxing
power of a municipality.



         MUNICIPAL  NOTES.  Municipal notes are subdivided into three categories
of short-term  obligations:  municipal  notes,  municipal  commercial  paper and
municipal demand obligations.

         Municipal notes are short-term  obligations with a maturity at the time
of  issuance  ranging  from six months to five  years.  The  principal  types of
municipal notes include tax anticipation notes, bond anticipation notes, revenue
anticipation  notes,  grant  anticipation notes and project notes. Notes sold in
anticipation  of collection of taxes,  a bond sale, or receipt of other revenues
are usually general obligations of the issuing municipality or agency.

         Municipal  commercial  paper  typically  consists  of  very  short-term
unsecured  negotiable  promissory  notes that are sold to meet seasonal  working
capital or interim  construction  financing  needs of a municipality  or agency.
While  these  obligations  are  intended  to be paid from  general  revenues  or
refinanced with long-term debt, they frequently are backed by letters of credit,
lending  agreements,   note  repurchase  agreements  or  other  credit  facility
agreements offered by banks or institutions.


         Municipal  demand  obligations are subdivided into two types:  variable
rate demand notes and master demand obligations.

         Variable  rate demand  notes are tax exempt  municipal  obligations  or
participation  interests that provide for a periodic  adjustment in the interest
rate paid on the notes.  They permit the holder to demand  payment of the notes,
or to demand  purchase  of the notes at a  purchase  price  equal to the  unpaid
principal  balance,  plus accrued  interest  either directly by the issuer or by
drawing on a bank letter of credit or guaranty issued with respect to such note.
The issuer of the municipal  obligation may have a corresponding right to prepay
at its discretion the  outstanding  principal of the note plus accrued  interest
upon notice  comparable to that required for the holder to demand  payment.  The
variable rate demand notes in which the Portfolio may invest are payable, or are
subject to purchase, on demand usually on notice of seven calendar days or less.
The terms of the notes provide that interest  rates are  adjustable at intervals
ranging from daily to six months,  and the  adjustments are based upon the prime
rate of a bank  or  other  appropriate  interest  rate  index  specified  in the
respective  notes.  Variable rate demand notes are valued at amortized  cost; no
value is assigned to the right of the  Portfolio to receive the par value of the
obligation upon demand or notice.



<PAGE>


                                      B-6


         Master demand  obligations are tax exempt  municipal  obligations  that
provide for a periodic  adjustment  in the  interest  rate paid and permit daily
changes in the amount  borrowed.  The  interest on such  obligations  is, in the
opinion of counsel for the borrower,  exempt from federal  income tax.  Although
there is no secondary market for master demand obligations, such obligations are
considered by the  Portfolio to be liquid  because they are payable upon demand.
The Portfolio has no specific  percentage  limitations  on investments in master
demand obligations.

         PUTS. The Portfolio may purchase without limit municipal bonds or notes
together  with the right to resell the bonds or notes to the seller at an agreed
price or yield within a specified period prior to the maturity date of the bonds
or notes.  Such a right to resell is  commonly  known as a "put." The  aggregate
price  for bonds or notes  with  puts may be higher  than the price for bonds or
notes without puts.  Consistent  with the Portfolio's  investment  objective and
subject to the  supervision of the Trustees,  the purpose of this practice is to
permit  the  Portfolio  to be fully  invested  in tax  exempt  securities  while
preserving  the  necessary  liquidity to purchase  securities  on a  when-issued
basis,  to meet  unusually  large  redemptions,  and to purchase at a later date
securities  other than those subject to the put. The  principal  risk of puts is
that the writer of the put may  default on its  obligation  to  repurchase.  The
Advisor will monitor each writer's ability to meet its obligations under puts.

         Puts may be  exercised  prior to the  expiration  date in order to fund
obligations to purchase other securities or to meet redemption  requests.  These
obligations  may arise during  periods in which proceeds from sales of interests
in the Portfolio and from recent sales of portfolio  securities are insufficient
to meet  obligations  or when the funds  available are  otherwise  allocated for
investment.  In addition,  puts may be exercised prior to the expiration date in
order to take advantage of alternative investment  opportunities or in the event
the Advisor revises its evaluation of the  creditworthiness of the issuer of the
underlying  security.  In  determining  whether to exercise  puts prior to their
expiration date and in selecting which puts to exercise,  the Advisor  considers
the amount of cash  available  to the  Portfolio,  the  expiration  dates of the
available  puts, any future  commitments for securities  purchases,  alternative
investment   opportunities,   the   desirability  of  retaining  the  underlying
securities  in the Portfolio  and the yield,  quality and maturity  dates of the
underlying securities.

         The Portfolio values any municipal bonds and notes subject to puts with
remaining  maturities of less than 60 days by the amortized cost method.  If the
Portfolio were to invest in municipal bonds and notes with maturities of 60 days
or more that are subject to puts separate from the  underlying  securities,  the
puts and the underlying securities would be valued at fair value


<PAGE>


                                      B-7


as  determined  in  accordance  with  procedures  established  by the  Board  of
Trustees.  The Board of Trustees would, in connection with the  determination of
the value of a put, consider,  among other factors,  the creditworthiness of the
writer of the put,  the  duration of the put,  the dates on which or the periods
during which the put may be exercised and the applicable  rules and  regulations
of the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC").  Prior to investing in
such  securities,  the Portfolio,  if deemed  necessary based upon the advice of
counsel, will apply to the SEC for an exemptive order, which may not be granted,
relating to the valuation of such securities.


         Since the value of the put is partly  dependent  on the  ability of the
put writer to meet its obligation to repurchase,  the  Portfolio's  policy is to
enter into put  transactions  only with  municipal  securities  dealers  who are
approved  by the  Portfolio's  Advisor.  Each dealer will be approved on its own
merits, and it is the Portfolio's  general policy to enter into put transactions
only with those dealers which are determined to present minimal credit risks. In
connection  with such  determination,  the Trustees  will review  regularly  the
Advisor's  list of  approved  dealers,  taking into  consideration,  among other
things, the ratings,  if available,  of their equity and debt securities,  their
reputation  in  the  municipal  securities  markets,   their  net  worth,  their
efficiency in consummating transactions and any collateral arrangements, such as
letters of credit,  securing the puts written by them.  Commercial  bank dealers
normally will be members of the Federal Reserve  System,  and other dealers will
be members of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or members of
a national  securities  exchange.  Other put writers will have  outstanding debt
rated Aa or better by  Moody's  Investors  Service,  Inc.  ("Moody's")  or AA or
better by Standard & Poor's  Ratings  Group  ("Standard & Poor's") or will be of
comparable  quality in the  Advisor's  opinion or such put writers'  obligations
will be collateralized and of comparable  quality in the Advisor's opinion.  The
Trustees have directed the Advisor not to enter into put  transactions  with any
dealer which in the judgment of the Advisor  becomes more than a minimal  credit
risk. In the event that a dealer should  default on its obligation to repurchase
an underlying  security,  the Portfolio is unable to predict  whether all or any
portion of any loss sustained could subsequently be recovered from such dealer.


         The  Portfolio  has been advised by counsel that it will be  considered
the owner of the  securities  subject  to the puts so that the  interest  on the
securities  is tax exempt  income to the  Portfolio.  Such  advice of counsel is
based on certain assumptions  concerning the terms of the puts and the attendant
circumstances.

FOREIGN INVESTMENTS

         To the extent that the Portfolio  invests in municipal  bonds and notes
backed by credit support arrangements with foreign


<PAGE>


                                      B-8


financial   institutions,   the  risks  associated  with  investing  in  foreign
securities may be relevant to the Portfolio.

ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS

         WHEN-ISSUED AND DELAYED DELIVERY SECURITIES. The Portfolio may purchase
securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis. For example,  delivery of
and payment for these  securities  can take place a month or more after the date
of the purchase commitment. The purchase price and the interest rate payable, if
any, on the securities are fixed on the purchase  commitment date or at the time
the settlement date is fixed.  The value of such securities is subject to market
fluctuation  and no interest  accrues to the Portfolio  until  settlement  takes
place. At the time the Portfolio makes the commitment to purchase  securities on
a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, it will record the transaction, reflect
the value each day of such securities in determining its net asset value and, if
applicable,  calculate  the maturity for the purposes of average  maturity  from
that date.  At the time of  settlement a  when-issued  security may be valued at
less than the purchase  price. To facilitate  such  acquisitions,  the Portfolio
will  maintain  with the  Custodian a  segregated  account  with liquid  assets,
consisting of cash, U.S. Government securities or other appropriate  securities,
in an amount at least  equal to such  commitments.  On  delivery  dates for such
transactions,  the Portfolio will meet its obligations  from maturities or sales
of the securities  held in the segregated  account and/or from cash flow. If the
Portfolio  chooses to dispose  of the right to  acquire a  when-issued  security
prior to its  acquisition,  it  could,  as with  the  disposition  of any  other
portfolio obligation,  incur a gain or loss due to market fluctuation. It is the
current  policy  of the  Portfolio  not to enter  into  when-issued  commitments
exceeding  in the  aggregate  15% of the market value of the  Portfolio's  total
assets,  less  liabilities  other than the  obligations  created by  when-issued
commitments.

         INVESTMENT COMPANY SECURITIES. Securities of other investment companies
may be acquired by the Portfolio to the extent  permitted  under the  Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act").  These limits require that, as
determined  immediately  after a purchase  is made,  (i) not more than 5% of the
value of the Portfolio's  total assets will be invested in the securities of any
one investment company,  (ii) not more than 10% of the value of its total assets
will be invested in the aggregate in  securities  of  investment  companies as a
group,  and (iii) not more than 3% of the  outstanding  voting  stock of any one
investment  company will be owned by the Portfolio.  As a shareholder of another
investment company, the Portfolio would bear, along with other shareholders, its
pro rata portion of the other investment company's expenses,  including advisory
fees.  These  expenses  would be in addition to the advisory and other  expenses
that the Portfolio bears directly in connection with its own operations.


<PAGE>


                                      B-9



         REVERSE  REPURCHASE  AGREEMENTS.  The  Portfolio may enter into reverse
repurchase agreements.  In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Portfolio sells a
security and agrees to repurchase  the same  security at a mutually  agreed upon
date and price. It may also be viewed as the borrowing of money by the Portfolio
and, therefore, is a form of leverage. The Portfolio will invest the proceeds of
borrowings under reverse repurchase agreements.  In addition, the Portfolio will
enter into a reverse  repurchase  agreement only when the interest  income to be
earned from the investment of the proceeds is greater than the interest  expense
of the  transaction.  The  Portfolio  will not invest the  proceeds of a reverse
repurchase  agreement  for a period  which  exceeds the  duration of the reverse
repurchase  agreement.  The  Portfolio  may not enter  into  reverse  repurchase
agreements exceeding in the aggregate one-third of the market value of its total
assets,   less  liabilities  other  than  the  obligations  created  by  reverse
repurchase  agreements.  The  Portfolio  will  establish  and maintain  with the
Custodian a separate  account with a segregated  portfolio of  securities  in an
amount at least equal to its purchase  obligations under its reverse  repurchase
agreements.  See "Investment Restrictions" below.


         LOANS OF PORTFOLIO SECURITIES. The Portfolio may lend its securities if
such loans are secured  continuously  by cash or  equivalent  collateral or by a
letter of credit in favor of the  Portfolio  at least equal at all times to 100%
of the market value of the securities loaned, plus accrued interest.  While such
securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Portfolio any income  accruing
thereon.  Loans will be subject to  termination  by the  Portfolio in the normal
settlement time,  generally five business days after notice,  or by the borrower
on one day's  notice.  Borrowed  securities  must be  returned  when the loan is
terminated.  Any gain or loss in the  market  price of the  borrowed  securities
which  occurs  during  the  term of the loan  inures  to the  Portfolio  and its
investors.  The Portfolio  may pay  reasonable  finders' and  custodial  fees in
connection  with a loan. In addition,  the Portfolio will consider all facts and
circumstances   including  the   creditworthiness  of  the  borrowing  financial
institution,  and the  Portfolio  will not make any loans in excess of one year.
The Portfolio  will not lend its securities to any officer,  Trustee,  Director,
employee or other  affiliate  of the  Portfolio,  the  Advisor or the  exclusive
placement agent, unless otherwise permitted by applicable law.


         PRIVATELY PLACED AND CERTAIN UNREGISTERED SECURITIES. The Portfolio may
invest  in  privately  placed,  restricted,  Rule  144A  or  other  unregistered
securities as described in Part A.

         As to illiquid  investments,  the  Portfolio  is subject to a risk that
should the Portfolio  decide to sell them when a ready buyer is not available at
a price the  Portfolio  deems  representative  of their value,  the value of the
Portfolio's net


<PAGE>


                                      B-10


assets  could  be  adversely  affected.  Where  an  illiquid  security  must  be
registered  under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") before
it may be  sold,  the  Portfolio  may be  obligated  to pay  all or  part of the
registration  expenses, and a considerable period may elapse between the time of
the  decision  to sell and the time the  Portfolio  may be  permitted  to sell a
security under an effective  registration  statement.  If, during such a period,
adverse market  conditions  were to develop,  the Portfolio  might obtain a less
favorable price than prevailed when it decided to sell.

         SYNTHETIC  VARIABLE  RATE  INSTRUMENTS.  The  Portfolio  may  invest in
certain synthetic  variable rate instruments as described in Part A. In the case
of some types of instruments credit enhancement is not provided,  and if certain
events, which may include (a) default in the payment of principal or interest on
the underlying bond, (b) downgrading of the bond below investment grade or (c) a
loss of the bond's tax exempt status,  occur,  then (i) the put will  terminate,
and (ii) the risk to the Portfolio will be that of holding a long-term bond.

QUALITY AND DIVERSIFICATION REQUIREMENTS


         The Portfolio is registered as a non-diversified investment company and
is not  limited  by the 1940 Act in the  proportion  of its  assets  that may be
invested in the obligations of a single issuer. Thus, the Portfolio may invest a
greater  proportion  of its  assets in the  securities  of a  smaller  number of
issuers  and, as a result,  will be subject to greater  risk with respect to its
portfolio   securities.   The   Portfolio,   however,   will   comply  with  the
diversification  requirements  imposed by the Internal  Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended  (the  "Code"),  to allow  investors  in the  Portfolio  to  qualify  as
regulated investment companies under Subchapter M of the Code.


         For purposes of diversification  under the Code and concentration under
the 1940 Act,  identification  of the issuer of municipal bonds or notes depends
on the terms and conditions of the obligation.  If the assets and revenues of an
agency,  authority,  instrumentality or other political subdivision are separate
from those of the  government  creating the  subdivision  and the  obligation is
backed only by the assets and revenues of the  subdivision,  such subdivision is
regarded as the sole issuer. Similarly, in the case of an industrial development
revenue bond or pollution  control  revenue  bond, if the bond is backed only by
the assets and revenues of the nongovernmental user, the nongovernmental user is
regarded  as the sole  issuer.  If in either  case the  creating  government  or
another entity guarantees an obligation,  the guaranty is regarded as a separate
security and treated as an issue of such guarantor.  Since securities  issued or
guaranteed by states or municipalities  are not voting  securities,  there is no
limitation on the percentage of a single issuer's securities which the Portfolio
may own so long as it does not invest more than 5% of its total  assets that are
subject


<PAGE>


                                      B-11


to the  diversification  limitation  in the  securities  of such issuer,  except
obligations  issued or  guaranteed  by the U.S.  Government.  Consequently,  the
Portfolio may invest in a greater percentage of the outstanding  securities of a
single  issuer  than  would  an  investment  company  which  invests  in  voting
securities.  See "Investment Restrictions" below.


         The  Portfolio  invests  principally  in  a  diversified  portfolio  of
"investment grade" tax exempt securities.  An investment grade bond is rated, on
the date of  investment  within the four highest  ratings of Moody's,  currently
Aaa, Aa, A and Baa, or of Standard & Poor's, currently AAA, AA, A and BBB, while
high grade debt is rated,  on the date of the investment  within the two highest
of such ratings.  Investment  grade  municipal  notes are rated,  on the date of
investment,  MIG-1 or MIG-2 by  Standard  & Poor's or SP-1 and SP-2 by  Moody's.
Investment grade municipal commercial paper is rated, on the date of investment,
Prime 1 or Prime 2 by Moody's and A-1 or A-2 by Standard & Poor's. The Portfolio
may also  invest up to 5% of its total  assets in  securities  which are  "below
investment grade". Such securities must be rated, on the date of investment,  Ba
by  Moody's  or BB by  Standard  &  Poor's.  The  Portfolio  may  invest in debt
securities  which are not rated or other debt  securities to which these ratings
are not  applicable,  if in the opinion of the Advisor,  such  securities are of
comparable quality to the rated securities discussed above. In addition,  at the
time the Portfolio  invests in any taxable  commercial paper, bank obligation or
repurchase agreement, the issuer must have outstanding debt rated A or higher by
Moody's or Standard & Poor's, the issuer's parent corporation, if any, must have
outstanding  commercial  paper  rated  Prime-1 by  Moody's or A-1 by  Standard &
Poor's,  or  if no  such  ratings  are  available,  the  investment  must  be of
comparable quality in the Advisor's opinion.


         In  determining  suitability  of  investment  in a  particular  unrated
security,  the Advisor takes into consideration asset and debt service coverage,
the purpose of the  financing,  history of the issuer,  existence of other rated
securities of the issuer, and other relevant  conditions,  such as comparability
to other issuers.

OPTIONS AND FUTURES TRANSACTIONS


         EXCHANGE TRADED AND OVER-THE-COUNTER-OPTIONS.  All options purchased or
sold by the  Portfolio  will  be  traded  on a  securities  exchange  or will be
purchased or sold by securities  dealers (over -the-counter or OTC options) that
meet  creditworthiness  standards  approved  by the  Board  of  Trustees.  While
exchange-traded options are obligations of the Options Clearing Corporation,  in
the case of OTC  options,  the  Portfolio  relies on the  dealer  from  which it
purchased  the  option to perform if the  option is  exercised.  Thus,  when the
Portfolio  purchases  an OTC  option,  it relies  on the  dealer  from  which it
purchased  the option to make or take  delivery  of the  underlying  securities.
Failure by the dealer to do so would  result in the loss of the premium  paid by
the



<PAGE>


                                      B-12


Portfolio as well as loss of the expected benefit of the transaction.

         The staff of the SEC has taken the position that, in general, purchased
OTC options and the underlying  securities used to cover written OTC options are
illiquid  securities.  However, the Portfolio may treat as liquid the underlying
securities used to cover written OTC options,  provided it has arrangements with
certain qualified dealers who agree that the Portfolio may repurchase any option
it writes for a maximum price to be calculated by a  predetermined  formula.  In
these  cases,  the OTC option  itself would only be  considered  illiquid to the
extent that the maximum repurchase price under the formula exceeds the intrinsic
value of the option.

         FUTURES  CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS ON FUTURES  CONTRACTS.  In entering into
futures and options  transactions  the  Portfolio  may  purchase or sell futures
contracts  and purchase  put and call  options and sell (write)  covered put and
call options on futures contracts.  Futures contracts obligate the buyer to take
and the seller to make  delivery at a future  date of a specified  quantity of a
financial  instrument  or an amount of cash  based on the value of a  securities
index.  Currently,  futures  contracts  are  available on various types of fixed
income  securities,  including but not limited to U.S. Treasury bonds, notes and
bills,  Eurodollar  certificates  of  deposit  and on  indexes  of fixed  income
securities and indexes of equity securities.

         Unlike a futures contract, which requires the parties to buy and sell a
security  or make a cash  settlement  payment  based on changes  in a  financial
instrument  or  securities  index on an  agreed  date,  an  option  on a futures
contract  entitles  its holder to decide on or before a future  date  whether to
enter into such a contract.  If the holder  decides not to exercise  its option,
the holder may close out the option  position  by  entering  into an  offsetting
transaction  or may decide to let the  option  expire and  forfeit  the  premium
thereon. The purchaser of an option on a futures contract pays a premium for the
option but makes no initial  margin  payments  or daily  payments of cash in the
nature of "variation"  margin payments to reflect the change in the value of the
underlying contract as does a purchaser or seller of a futures contract.

         The seller of an option on a futures contract receives the premium paid
by the purchaser and may be required to pay initial margin. Amounts equal to the
initial margin and any additional  collateral required on any options on futures
contracts  sold by the  Portfolio  are paid by the  Portfolio  into a segregated
account, in the name of the Futures Commission Merchant, as required by the 1940
Act and the SEC's interpretations thereunder.

         COMBINED  POSITIONS.  The  Portfolio  may purchase and write options in
combination with each other, or in combination with


<PAGE>


                                      B-13


futures or forward contracts,  to adjust the risk and return  characteristics of
the overall position.  For example,  the Portfolio may purchase a put option and
write a call option on the same underlying  instrument,  in order to construct a
combined position whose risk and return characteristics are similar to selling a
futures  contract.  Another possible  combined  position would involve writing a
call option at one strike  price and buying a call option at a lower  price,  in
order  to  reduce  the  risk  of the  written  call  option  in the  event  of a
substantial price increase.  Because combined options positions involve multiple
trades,  they result in higher  transaction  costs and may be more  difficult to
open and close out.

         CORRELATION  OF PRICE  CHANGES.  Because there are a limited  number of
types of exchange-traded  options and futures  contracts,  it is likely that the
standardized  options  and  futures  contracts  available  will  not  match  the
Portfolio's current or anticipated investments exactly. The Portfolio may invest
in options and futures  contracts  based on securities  with different  issuers,
maturities,  or other  characteristics from the securities in which it typically
invests,  which  involves a risk that the options or futures  position  will not
track the performance of the Portfolio's other investments.

         Options and futures  contracts  prices can also diverge from the prices
of their underlying  instruments,  even if the underlying  instruments match the
Portfolio's  investments well. Options and futures contracts prices are affected
by such factors as current and anticipated short term interest rates, changes in
volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until expiration
of the contract,  which may not affect security  prices the same way.  Imperfect
correlation  may also result from differing  levels of demand in the options and
futures markets and the securities markets,  from structural  differences in how
options and futures and securities are traded, or from imposition of daily price
fluctuation  limits or trading halts. The Portfolio may purchase or sell options
and futures  contracts  with a greater or lesser  value than the  securities  it
wishes to hedge or intends to  purchase  in order to attempt to  compensate  for
differences in volatility between the contract and the securities, although this
may not be successful in all cases. If price changes in the Portfolio's  options
or futures  positions  are poorly  correlated  with its other  investments,  the
positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or result in losses that are not
offset by gains in other investments.

         LIQUIDITY  OF OPTIONS AND FUTURES  CONTRACTS.  There is no  assurance a
liquid market will exist for any  particular  option or futures  contract at any
particular  time even if the  contract is traded on an  exchange.  In  addition,
exchanges may establish daily price  fluctuation  limits for options and futures
contracts and may halt trading if a contract's  price moves up or down more than
the limit in a given day. On volatile  trading  days when the price  fluctuation
limit is reached or a trading halt is imposed,


<PAGE>


                                      B-14



it may be impossible  for the Portfolio to enter into new positions or close out
existing positions.  If the market for a contract is not liquid because of price
fluctuation  limits  or  otherwise,  it  could  prevent  prompt  liquidation  of
unfavorable  positions,  and could potentially require the Portfolio to continue
to hold a position  until  delivery or  expiration  regardless of changes in its
value.  As a result,  the  Portfolio's  access to other assets held to cover its
options or futures  positions could also be impaired.  (See "Exchange Traded and
Over  -the-Counter  Options"  above for a discussion of the liquidity of options
not traded on an exchange.)


         POSITION LIMITS.  Futures exchanges can limit the number of futures and
options on futures  contracts that can be held or controlled by an entity. If an
adequate  exemption  cannot be  obtained,  the  Portfolio  or the Advisor may be
required to reduce the size of its futures and options  positions  or may not be
able to trade a certain futures or options  contract in order to avoid exceeding
such limits.

         ASSET  COVERAGE  FOR  FUTURES  CONTRACTS  AND  OPTIONS  POSITIONS.  The
Portfolio  intends  to comply  with  Section  4.5 of the  regulations  under the
Commodity  Exchange  Act,  which  limits the extent to which the  Portfolio  can
commit assets to initial margin deposits and option premiums.  In addition,  the
Portfolio  will comply with  guidelines  established  by the SEC with respect to
coverage of options and futures contracts by mutual funds, and if the guidelines
so require,  will set aside appropriate liquid assets in a segregated  custodial
account in the amount prescribed. Securities held in a segregated account cannot
be sold while the  futures  contract or option is  outstanding,  unless they are
replaced with other suitable  assets.  As a result,  there is a possibility that
segregation  of a  large  percentage  of the  Portfolio's  assets  could  impede
portfolio  management or the Portfolio's  ability to meet redemption requests or
other current obligations.

RISK MANAGEMENT


         The  Portfolio  may  employ  non-hedging  risk  management  techniques.
Examples of such strategies include  synthetically  altering the duration of its
portfolio or the mix of securities in its portfolio. For example, if the Advisor
wishes  to  extend  maturities  in a fixed  income  portfolio  in  order to take
advantage  of an  anticipated  decline in interest  rates,  but does not wish to
purchase the underlying  long-term  securities,  it might cause the Portfolio to
purchase  futures  contracts on long-term  debt  securities.  Similarly,  if the
Advisor wishes wished to decrease fixed income securities or purchase  equities,
it could cause the Portfolio to sell futures  contracts on debt  securities  and
purchase  futures  contracts on a stock index.  Such non-hedging risk management
techniques are not speculative, but because they involve leverage include, as do
all leveraged transactions, the possibility of



<PAGE>


                                      B-15


losses as well as gains that are greater than if these  techniques  involved the
purchase  and sale of the  securities  themselves  rather  than their  synthetic
derivatives.

         SPECIAL  FACTORS  AFFECTING THE  PORTFOLIO.  The  Portfolio  intends to
invest a high proportion of its assets in municipal  obligations of the State of
New   York   and   its   political   subdivisions,   municipalities,   agencies,
instrumentalities  and public authorities.  Payment of interest and preservation
of principal is dependent upon the continuing ability of New York issuers and/or
obligators of state,  municipal and public  authority  debt  obligations to meet
their obligations thereunder.

         The fiscal stability of New York State is related, at least in part, to
the fiscal stability of its localities and authorities.  Various State agencies,
authorities  and localities  have issued large amounts of bonds and notes either
guaranteed or supported by the State through lease-purchase arrangements,  other
contractual  arrangements or moral obligation provisions.  While debt service is
normally  paid out of revenues  generated  by  projects of such State  agencies,
authorities and localities,  the State has had to provide special  assistance in
recent  years,  in some cases of a recurring  nature,  to enable such  agencies,
authorities  and  localities to meet their  financial  obligations  and, in some
cases,  to prevent or cure  defaults.  To the extent  State  agencies  and local
governments  require State assistance to meet their financial  obligations,  the
ability of the State to meet its own obligations as they become due or to obtain
additional financing could be adversely affected.

         For further information concerning New York municipal obligations,  see
"Additional  Information  Concerning New York Municipal  Obligations" below. The
summary  set forth above and below is  included  for the purpose of  providing a
general  description  of New York State and New York City  credit and  financial
conditions.  This summary is based on information from an official  statement of
New York general  obligation  municipal  obligations  and does not purport to be
complete.
<PAGE>


                                      B-16


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NEW YORK MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS

         The following  information  is a summary of special  factors  affecting
investments  in New York  municipal  obligations.  It does not  purport  to be a
complete  description  and is based on information  from the Annual  Information
Statement of the State of New York dated June 23, 1995.

GENERAL

         New York (the "State") is the third most  populous  state in the nation
and has a  relatively  high level of personal  wealth.  The  State's  economy is
diverse with a  comparatively  large share of the nation's  finance,  insurance,
transportation,  communications and services employment,  and a very small share
of the nation's farming and mining activity. The State's location, air transport
facilities and natural  harbors have made it an important link in  international
commerce.  Travel and tourism  constitute an important part of the economy.  The
State has a declining  proportion of its workforce  engaged in manufacturing and
an increasing proportion engaged in service industries. This transition reflects
a national trend.

         The State has  historically  been one of the  wealthiest  states in the
nation. For decades,  however, the State economy has grown more slowly than that
of the nation as a whole,  resulting  in the  gradual  erosion  of its  relative
economic  affluence.  Statewide,  urban  centers  have  experienced  significant
changes involving migration of the more affluent to the suburbs and an influx of
generally less affluent residents.  Regionally,  the older Northeast cities have
suffered because of the relative success that the South and the West have had in
attracting people and business.  New York City (the "City") has also had to face
greater  competition as other major cities have developed financial and business
capabilities  which  make  them  less  dependent  on  the  specialized  services
traditionally available almost exclusively in the City.

         Although  industry and commerce  are broadly  spread  across the State,
particular  activities  are  concentrated  in the following  areas:  Westchester
County --  headquarters  for  several  major  corporations;  Buffalo  -- diverse
manufacturing  base;  Rochester  --  manufacture  of  photographic  and  optical
equipment;   Syracuse  and  Utica-Rome  area  --  production  of  machinery  and
transportation  equipment;  Albany-Troy-Schenectady  -- government and education
center and  production of electrical  products;  Binghampton -- original site of
the International  Business Machines Corporation and continued  concentration of
employment  in computer and other high  technology  manufacturing;  and New York
City  --  headquarters  for the  nation's  securities  business  and for a major
portion  of  the  nation's  major  commercial   banks,   diversified   financial
institutions and life insurance companies. In addition, the City houses the home
offices of three major radio and television  broadcasting networks,  most of the
national  magazines and a substantial  portion of the nation's book  publishers.
The City also  retains  leadership  in the design and  manufacture  of men's and
women's apparel.

ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

         The economic and financial condition of the State may be affected by
various financial, social, economic and political factors. Those factors can be


<PAGE>


                                      B-17

very complex,  may vary from fiscal year to fiscal year,  and are frequently the
result  of  actions   taken  not  only  by  the  State  and  its   agencies  and
instrumentalities,  but also by entities,  such as the Federal government,  that
are not under the control of the State.  The State  Financial Plan is based upon
forecasts of national and State  economic  activity.  Economic  forecasts have
frequently  failed to predict  accurately the timing and magnitude of changes in
the national and the State economies.  Many uncertainties  exist in forecasts of
both the national  and State  economies,  including  consumer  attitudes  toward
spending,  the  extent of  corporate  and  governmental  restructuring,  Federal
financial and monetary  policies,  the  availability  of credit,  the level of
interest  rates,  and the  condition of the world  economy,  which would have an
adverse  effect on the State.  There can be no assurance  that the State economy
will not  experience  results  in the  current  fiscal  year that are worse than
predicted,  with  corresponding  material  and  adverse  effects on the  State's
projections of receipts and disbursements.

         The national economy began to expand in 1991,  although the growth rate
for the first two years of the expansion was modest by historical standards. The
State economy remained in recession until 1993, when employment  growth resumed.
Since November 1992, the State has added approximately  185,000 jobs. Employment
growth has been  hindered  during  recent years by  significant  cutbacks in the
computer and instrument manufacturing, utility, and defense industries. Personal
income increased  substantially  in 1992 and 1993, aided  significantly by large
bonus payments in banking and financial industries.

         The national  economy  performed  better in 1994 than in any year since
the recovery began in 1991. National job and income growth were substantial.  In
response,  the Federal Reserve Board shifted to a policy of monetary  tightening
by  raising  interest  rates  throughout  the year.  As a result,  the  national
economic growth is expected to weaken, but not turn negative,  during the course
of 1995  before  beginning  to rebound by the end of the year.  This  dynamic is
often described as a "soft landing".  The overall rate of growth of the national
economy during  calendar year 1995 will be slightly  below the  "consensus" of a
widely  followed  survey of national  economic  forecasters.  Growth in the real
gross  domestic  product  during 1995 is projected to be moderate (3.0 percent),
with declines in defense  spending and net exports more than offset by increases
in consumption and investment.  Continuing efforts by business and government to
reduce  costs are  expected to exert a drag on economic  growth.  Inflation,  as
measured by the Consumer Price Index, is projected to remain about 3 percent due
to moderate wage growth and foreign  competition.  Personal income and wages are
projected to increase by about 6 percent or more.

         The State  economy had a mixed  performance  during 1994.  The moderate
employment  growth  that  characterized  1993  continued  into  mid-1994,   then
virtually ceased.  New York's economy is expected to continue to expand modestly
during 1995, but there will be a pronounced  slowdown  during the course of the
year.  Although industries that export goods and services abroad are expected to
benefit from the lower dollar,  growth will be slowed by government  cutbacks at
all levels. On an average annual basis, employment growth will be about the same
as 1994. Both personal income and wages are expected to record moderate gains in
1995.  Bonus payments in the  securities  industry are expected to increase from
last year's depressed level. Personal income rose 4.0 percent in 1994.


<PAGE>


                                      B-18


         The State has for many years had a very high State and local tax burden
relative to other States.  The State and its localities have used these taxes to
develop and maintain their transportation networks, public schools and colleges,
public  health  systems,  other  social  services and  recreational  facilities.
Despite these benefits,  the burden of State and local taxation,  in combination
with  the  many  other  causes  of  regional  economic  dislocation,   may  have
contributed  to the decisions of some  businesses  and  individuals  to relocate
outside, or not locate within, the State.

         To  stimulate  the State's  economic  growth,  the State has  developed
programs,  including the provision of direct financial  assistance,  designed to
assist businesses to expand existing  operations located within the State and to
attract new  businesses  to the State.  Local  industrial  development  agencies
raised an aggregate of  approximately  $7.8 billion in separate  tax-exempt bond
issues through  December 31, 1993.  There are currently  over 100 county,  city,
town and village  agencies.  In addition,  the New York State Urban  Development
Corporation  is  empowered  to issue,  subject to certain  State  constitutional
restrictions and to approval by the Public Authorities  Control Board, bonds and
notes on behalf of private corporations for economic development  projects.  The
State has also  taken  advantage  of  changes in  Federal  bank  regulations  to
establish a free international banking zone in the City.

         In addition, the State has provided various tax incentives to encourage
business relocation and expansion.  These programs include direct tax abatements
from local property taxes for new facilities  (subject to locality approval) and
investment tax credits that are applied against the State corporation  franchise
tax. Furthermore, legislation passed in 1986 authorizes the creation of up to 40
"economic  development  zones" in economically  distressed regions of the State.
Businesses in these zones are provided a variety of tax and other  incentives to
create jobs and make investments in the zones.

STATE FINANCIAL PLAN

         The  State  Constitution   requires  the  Governor  to  submit  to  the
Legislature  a balanced  Executive  Budget  which  contains  a complete  plan of
expenditures  (the "State  Financial  Plan") for the ensuing fiscal year and all
moneys and revenues  estimated to be available  therefor,  accompanied  by bills
containing  all  proposed  appropriations  or  reappropriations  and  any new or
modified revenue measures to be enacted in connection with the Executive Budget.
A final budget must be approved  before the  statutory  deadline of April 1. The
State Financial Plan is updated quarterly pursuant to law.

         The State's fiscal year,  which commenced on April 1, 1995, and ends on
March 31, 1996, is referred to herein as the State's 1995-96 fiscal year.

         The  State's  budget for the  1995-96  fiscal  year was  enacted by the
Legislature on June 7, 1995,  more than two months after the start of the fiscal
year. Prior to adoption of the budget,  the Legislature  enacted  appropriations
for  disbursements  considered  to be necessary for State  operations  and other
purposes,  including all necessary  appropriations  for debt service.  The State
Financial  Plan for the 1995-96 fiscal year was formulated on June 20, 1995, and
is based on the State's budget as enacted by the Legislature and signed into law
by the Governor.


<PAGE>


                                      B-19

The State  Financial  Plan will be updated  quarterly  pursuant  to law in July,
October and January.

         The 1995-96 budget is the first to be enacted in the  administration of
the  Governor,  who assumed  office on January 1. It is the first budget in over
half  a  century  which   proposed   and,  as  enacted,   projects  an  absolute
year-over-year  decline  in  General  Fund  disbursements.  Spending  for  State
operations  is projected  to drop even more  sharply,  by 4.6  percent.  Nominal
spending  from all  State  funding  sources  (I.E.,  excluding  Federal  aid) is
proposed to increase by only 2.5 percent from the prior fiscal year, in contrast
to the prior decade when such  spending  growth  averaged  more than 6.0 percent
annually.

         In his Executive  Budget,  the Governor  indicated  that in the 1995-96
fiscal year,  the State  Financial  Plan,  based on  then-current  law governing
spending  and  revenues,  would be out of balance by almost $4.7  billion,  as a
result of the projected  structural deficit resulting from the ongoing disparity
between sluggish growth in receipts,  the effect of prior-year tax changes,  and
the rapid  acceleration  of  spending  growth;  the impact of  unfunded  1994-95
initiatives,  primarily  for  local  aid  programs;  and  the  use  of  one-time
solutions,  primarily  surplus  funds  from the prior  year,  to fund  recurring
spending in the 1994-95 budget.  The Governor  proposed  additional tax cuts, to
spur economic growth and provide relief for low- and  middle-income  tax payers,
which were larger than those ultimately adopted, and which added $240 million to
the then projected  imbalance or budget gap, bringing the total to approximately
$5 billion.

         This gap is projected to be closed in the 1995-96 State  Financial Plan
based on the  enacted  budget,  through a series  of  actions,  mainly  spending
reductions  and cost  containment  measures  and  certain  reestimates  that are
expected to be recurring,  but also through the use of one-time  solutions.  The
State  Financial  Plan  projects  (i) nearly $1.6  billion in savings  from cost
containment,  disbursement  reestimates,  and other  savings  in social  welfare
programs,  including  Medicaid,  income maintenance and various child and family
care programs;  (ii) $2.2 billion in savings from State agency actions to reduce
spending on the State workforce, SUNY and CUNY, mental hygiene programs, capital
projects,  the prison system and fringe benefits;  (iii) $300 million in savings
from  local  assistance  reforms,  including  actions  affecting  school aid and
revenue  sharing while  proposing  program  legislation  to provide  relief from
certain mandates that increase local spending; (iv) over $400 million in revenue
measures,  primarily  a new Quick Draw  Lottery  game,  changes  to tax  payment
schedules,  and the sale of assets;  and (v) $300  million from  reestimates  in
receipts.

         The Executive Budget indicates that for years State revenues have grown
at a slower  rate  than  State  spending,  producing  an  increasing  structural
deficit,  and that as the Executive  Budget is enacted,  the State will start to
eliminate the  structural  imbalance that has  characterized  the State's fiscal
record. There can, however, be no assurances that the tax and spending cuts will
eliminate   potential   imbalances  in  future  fiscal  years.   The  Governor's
recommended multi-year personal income tax cuts are designed to reduce the yield
on that tax by about one-third by 1998, and could require significant additional
spending cuts in those years,  increased  economic growth to provide  additional
revenues, additional revenue measures, or a combination of those factors.


<PAGE>


                                      B-20


         GOVERNMENT FUNDS

         The four governmental fund types that comprise the State Financial Plan
are the General Fund, the Special Revenue Funds, the Capital Projects Funds, and
the Debt Service Funds.

         GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS

         The General Fund is the  principal  operating  fund of the State and is
used to account for all  financial  transactions,  except  those  required to be
accounted  for in another  fund.  It is the State's  largest  fund and  receives
almost all State taxes and other resources not dedicated to particular purposes.
In the State's  1995-96 fiscal year, the General Fund is expected to account for
approximately  49  percent  of total  governmental-funded  disbursements  and 71
percent  of total  State-funded  disbursements.  General  Fund  moneys  are also
transferred to other funds,  primarily to support certain  capital  projects and
debt  service on  long-term  bonds,  where these costs are not funded from other
sources.

         The Financial  Plan for the 1995-96 fiscal year released on February 1,
1995,  projects General Fund receipts,  including transfers from other funds, of
$33.110 billion, a reduction of $48 million from the total receipts in the 1994-
95 fiscal year.  Tax receipts are  projected at $29.793  billion for the 1995-96
fiscal  year.  Although  growth  in the base for tax  receipts  is  expected  to
accelerate  during the 1995-96 fiscal year, tax receipts are expected to fall by
3.5 percent,  principally due to the combined effect of implementing  during the
1995-96  fiscal year (1) a portion of the tax reductions  originally  enacted in
1987 and deferred each year since 1990,  (2)  additional tax cuts to prevent tax
increases  also  originally  enacted  in 1987  from  taking  effect  and (3) the
proposed  employer day care credit ($5 million),  together with the  incremental
cost of the tax  reductions  enacted  in 1994 (more  than $500  million),  which
effectively negate the effect of projected growth in the recurring revenue base.
In  addition,  certain  nonrecurring  revenues  in the  1994-95  receipts  base,
including  the  1993-94  surplus of $1.026  billion,  additional  earmarking  to
dedicated  funds  (more  than $210  million)  and other  miscellaneous  one-time
receipts  (more than $100 million) are not available in the 1995-96 fiscal year,
thereby reducing potential year-over-year growth by another 4 percentage points.

         The projected  yield of personal  income tax in the 1995-96 fiscal year
of $17.285  billion is a decrease of $305 million from reported  collections  in
the State's  1994-95 fiscal year. The decrease  reflects both the effects of the
tax reductions and the fact that reported collections in the preceding year were
affected by net refund reserve transactions that buoyed collections in that year
by $862 million that will be  unavailable  in the current  year.  Without  these
changes,  the yield of the tax would  have  grown by more than $1.0  billion  (6
percent),  reflecting  liability  growth  for the  1995 tax  year  projected  at
approximately  the same rate.  The income base for the tax is  projected to rise
approximately  5 percent  for the 1995 tax year.  Personal  income tax  receipts
showed a sharp  increase  in 1994-95  and are  expected  to decline in  1995-96.
Personal income tax reductions recommended in the Executive Budget are projected
to produce taxpayer savings of $720 million in calendar year 1995 reflecting the
scheduled implementation of the 1987 tax reductions. The tax reductions


<PAGE>


                                      B-21

recommended by the Governor are part of a multi-year  program designed to reduce
the yield of the income tax by about one-third by 1998.

         Receipts in user taxes and fees in the State's  1995-96 fiscal year are
expected to total $6.697 billion, an increase of $73 million from reported 1994-
95 results. Growth in user taxes and fees is expected to slow to about 1 percent
in  1995-96,  reflecting  nearly $70  million of  additional  tax relief in this
category in the coming year resulting  from tax reductions  enacted in 1994, the
absence of extraordinary audit collections  received in 1994-95,  and a slowdown
in the  underlying  growth  rate of sales and use tax  collections,  offset by a
projected  improvement of $41 million as a result of recommended  legislation to
enhance sales tax collection procedures.  Business tax receipts are projected at
$4.709 billion,  a decline of $360 million from reported  1994-95  results.  The
decline  in the  1995-96  fiscal  year  largely  reflecting  the  effect  of tax
reductions enacted in 1994.

         Total receipts from other taxes in the State's  1995-96 fiscal year are
projected at $1.102  billion,  $6 million less than in the preceding  year.  The
estimates  reflect  1994 and 1995  legislation  reducing  the burden of the real
property  gains tax and the estate tax as well as  diversion of a portion of the
real  estate  transfer  tax  proceeds  to  the  Environmental  Protection  Fund.
Miscellaneous  receipts in the State's 1995-96 fiscal year are expected to total
$1.596  billion,  an increase of $335 million  above the amount  received in the
prior  State  fiscal  year.  Growth in overall  collections  from  miscellaneous
receipts in the coming  fiscal year is expected to result  largely  from several
discrete  actions  involving   settlement  of  environmental   litigation,   the
recommended  merger  of  public  authorities,  and  transactions  with the Power
Authority,   which   together   account  for  over  $200  million  of  projected
miscellaneous  receipts  anticipated  in  1995-96.  Transfers  from other  funds
continue at prior year levels, with the addition of the transfer of $220 million
in excess funds from the Metropolitan Mass Transportation  Operating  Assistance
Fund.

         GENERAL FUND DISBURSEMENTS

         General Fund  disbursements  are projected to total $33.055  billion in
1995-96, a decrease of $344 million from the total amount disbursed in the prior
fiscal year. This decline reflects a broad agenda of cost  containment  actions,
more than offsetting  modest increases for fixed costs,  such as pensions,  debt
service on bonds  sold  during  the  current  year and  capital  projects  under
construction.

         Disbursements  from grants to local  governments are projected to total
$22.910  billion in the 1995-96 State Financial Plan, a decrease of $392 million
from  1994-95  levels.  Although  spending in this  category is reduced,  direct
payments to local  governments,  including  school aid and  revenue  sharing are
maintained  largely at last year's levels.  This category of the State Financial
Plan  includes  $10.823  billion in aid for  elementary,  secondary,  and higher
education.  Costs for social services, such as Medicaid,  income maintenance and
child  support  services  account for $8.706  billion.  Remaining  disbursements
primarily support community-based mental hygiene programs,  community and public
health programs, local transportation programs, and revenue sharing.


<PAGE>


                                      B-22


         Significant  decreases  from the prior year  result  largely  from cost
containment initiatives in Medicaid and other social welfare programs.  Payments
for Medicaid  from the General Fund are  projected to be $506 million lower than
in 1994-95. $128 Million in operating aid to the New York City Transit Authority
will be  eliminated,  matching  the  reduction  in New York City  support of the
Authority.

         Spending  for  State  operations  is  projected  at $6.020  billion,  a
decrease of $288 million.  Recommendations  in the  Executive  Budget reduce the
workforce by approximately  3,200 positions (most of which reduce  disbursements
in this category).

         Spending for general  State  charges is projected at $2.080  billion in
the 1995-96 State Financial  Plan, and are virtually  unchanged from the 1994-95
level.  The budgeted  amount for general State  charges  assumes the use of $110
million from a special reserve for pension supplementation,  established in 1970
and funded through State and local employer  contributions  in the early 1970's,
to offset the State's pension contribution.  The Comptroller, as sole trustee of
the Common Retirement Fund and administrative  head of the Retirement System, is
in the  process of  reviewing  the  legislation  that  directs  the use of these
reserves to determine  whether or not to commence  legal  proceedings to prevent
such  proposed  use in the enacted  1995-96  State  budget as a violation of the
State  Constitution,  and there is a substantial  likelihood that he will do so.
The Executive  considers  the proposed use of these  reserves to be a credit for
prior-year supplementation payments and, therefore, in compliance with the State
Constitution.

         Debt  service in the  General  Fund for  1995-96  reflects  only the $9
million  interest  cost of the  State's  commercial  paper  program.  No cost is
included for a TRAN borrowing, since none is expected to be undertaken.  General
Fund  debt  service  on  short-term   obligations  of  the  State  reflects  the
elimination  of the  State's  spring  borrowing.  Transfers  in  support of debt
service are  projected to total $1.583  billion,  and increase of $157  million.
This  increase is heightened  by the use of one-time  reimbursements  from other
funds in the 1994-95 fiscal year.  Transfers in support of capital  projects are
projected to total $375  million,  an increase of $169 million,  which  reflects
significant  investments  in both new and ongoing  capital  programs.  All other
transfers  are  projected to total $78  million,  an increase of $9 million from
1994-95 levels.

         The 1995-96 opening fund balance of $158 million  includes $157 million
which is reserved in the Tax  Stabilization  Reserve Fund, as well as $1 million
which is reserved in the Contingency  Reserve Fund. The Contingency Reserve Fund
was established in 1993-94 to set aside moneys to address  adverse  judgments or
settlements  resulting  from  litigation  against the State.  The  closing  fund
balance in the General Fund of $213  million  reflects a balance of $172 million
in the Tax Stabilization  Reserve Fund,  following an additional  payment of $15
million during the year, and a balance of $41 million in the Contingency Reserve
Fund.

         The 1995-96  Financial Plan includes over $600 million in non-recurring
resources.  These actions include items discussed  above, as well as retroactive
Federal  reimbursements and some  non-recurring  social welfare cost containment
actions. The Budget Division believes that recommendations included in the


<PAGE>


                                      B-23

Executive Budget will provide fully annualized savings in 1996-97 that more than
offset the non-recurring resources used in 1995-96.

         SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

         Special  Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific
revenue  sources such as Federal grants that are legally  restricted,  either by
the Legislature or outside parties, to expenditures for specified purposes.  For
1995-96, the State Financial Plan projects disbursements of $26.002 billion from
these funds,  an increase of $1.641 billion over 1994-95  levels.  Disbursements
from Federal  funds,  primarily  the Federal  share of Medicaid and other social
services programs,  are projected to total $19.209 billion in the 1995-96 fiscal
year.  Remaining  projected spending of $6.793 billion primarily reflects aid to
SUNY supported by tuition and dormitory fees,  education aid funded from lottery
receipts,  operating aid payments to the Metropolitan  Transportation  Authority
funded  from the  proceeds of  dedicated  transportation  taxes,  and costs of a
variety of  self-supporting  programs  which deliver  services  financed by user
fees.

         CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS

         Capital Projects Funds are used to account for the financial  resources
used for the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of major state capital
facilities  and for capital  assistance  grants to certain  local  government or
public authorities.  This fund type consists of the Capital Projects Fund, which
is  supported by tax dollars  transferred  from the General  Fund,  and 37 other
capital funds established to distinguish specific capital construction  purposes
supported by other revenues.

         Disbursements  from the Capital Projects Funds in 1995-96 are projected
at $4.160 billion, an increase of $541 million over prior-year levels.  Spending
for capital projects will be financed through a combination of sources:  Federal
grants,  public authority bond proceeds,  general obligation bond proceeds,  and
current  revenues.  Total  receipts  in this fund type are  projected  at $4.170
billion,  not including $364 million  expected to be available from the proceeds
of general obligation bonds.

         DEBT SERVICE FUNDS

         Debt Service Funds are used to account for the payment of principal of,
and  interest  on,  long-term  debt of the State and to meet  commitments  under
lease-purchase   and  other   contractual-obligation   financing   arrangements.
Disbursements  are  estimated at $2.506  billion in the 1995-96  fiscal year, an
increase of $303 million  from  1994-95.  The transfer  from the General Fund of
$1.583  billion  is  expected  to finance  63  percent  of these  payments.  The
remaining  payments are expected to be financed by pledged  revenues,  including
$1.794 billion in taxes,  $228 million in dedicated  fees, and $2.200 billion in
patient  revenues,   including  transfers  of  Federal   reimbursements.   After
impoundment  for debt  service,  as required,  $3.481  billion is expected to be
transferred to the General Fund and other funds in support of State  operations.
The  largest  transfer - $1.761  billion - is made to the Special  Revenue  Fund
type, in support of operations of the mental  hygiene  agencies.  Another $1.341
billion in excess sales taxes is expected


<PAGE>


                                      B-24

to be  transferred  to the General  Fund,  following  payment of projected  debt
service on bonds of LGAC.

         The increase in debt service costs  recommended in the Executive Budget
primarily  reflects  prior capital  commitments  financed by bonds issued by the
State  and  State-supported  debt  issued  by its  public  authorities,  and the
completion  of  the  LGAC  program.  The  increase  has  been  moderated  by the
reductions to  bond-financed  capital  spending as discussed above, and reflects
debt issuances in 1994-95 and 1995-96 which are lower than they would have been,
absent the Governor's review of capital spending.

         CASH FLOW

         For the second  time in many  years,  the State will meet its cash flow
needs  without  relying on a spring  borrowing.  However,  this  achievement  is
predicated on two actions:  the issuance of all remaining LGAC bonds  authorized
in the 1990  statute;  and the passage of proposed  legislation  permitting  the
State to use,  for cash  flow  purposes  only,  balances  in the  Lottery  Fund.
Temporary  transfers  will be returned  within five months so that all available
Lottery  moneys  as well as  advances  of  additional  aid can be paid to school
districts in September.

         The lingering  impact of the 1994-95  receipts  shortfall -- as well as
the impact of the potential $5 billion  1995-96  imbalance on cash operations --
exerts  substantial  pressures on the State's cash balance position in the first
three months of the fiscal year.  These pressures are expected to abate later in
the 1995-96 fiscal year, as cash outlays decline from previous levels consistent
with cost-savings initiatives proposed in the Executive Budget.

PRIOR FISCAL YEARS

         New York State's  financial  operations  have  improved  during  recent
fiscal years.  During the period  1989-90  through  1991-92,  the State incurred
General Fund operating deficits that were closed with receipts from the issuance
of tax and revenue anticipation notes ("TRANs").  First, the national recession,
and then the lingering  economic  slowdown in the New York and regional economy,
resulted in repeated  shortfalls in receipts and three budget deficits.  For its
1992-93 and 1993-94 fiscal years, the State recorded  balanced budgets on a cash
basis, with substantial fund balances in each year as described below.

         1994-95 FISCAL YEAR

         The  State's  budget for the  1994-95  fiscal  year was  enacted by the
Legislature on  June 7,  1994,  more than two  months  after the start of the
fiscal  year.  Prior  to  adoption  of  the  budget,  the  Legislature   enacted
appropriations for disbursements considered to be necessary for State operations
and other purposes, including all necessary appropriations for debt service.

         The 1994-95  budget  contained a  significant  investment in efforts to
spur  economic  growth.  The budget  included  provisions to reduce the level of
business  taxation in New York,  with cuts in the corporate tax  surcharge,  the
alternative  minimum tax imposed on business  and the  petroleum  business  tax,
repeal of the State's hotel  occupancy  tax, and reductions in the real property
gains tax to


<PAGE>


                                      B-25

stimulate  construction  and  facilitate  the real estate  industry's  access to
capital.  Complementing  the  elimination  of the  hotel  tax was a $10  million
investment  of State  funds in the "I Love New York"  program  designed  to spur
tourism activity throughout the State.

         To help strengthen the State's  economic  recovery,  the 1994-95 budget
also  included  more  than $200  million  in  additional  funding  for  economic
development programs. Special emphasis was placed on programs intended to enable
New York State to: (i) invest in high technology industries;  (ii) expand access
to  foreign   markets;   (iii)  strengthen   assistance  to  small   businesses,
particularly  those owned by women and  minorities;  (iv) retain and attract new
manufacturing  jobs;  (v) help companies and  communities  impacted by continued
cutbacks in Federal defense spending and ongoing corporate downsizings; and (vi)
bolster the tourism industry. In addition,  the budget included increased levels
of support for  programs  to rebuild  and  maintain  State  infrastructure,  and
provisions to create 21 new economic development zones.

         New York State ended its 1994-95  fiscal year with the General  Fund in
balance.  The closing fund balance of $158 million  reflects $157 million in the
Tax  Stabilization  Reserve Fund and $1 million in the Contingency  Reserve Fund
("CRF").  The CRF was  established  in State Fiscal year 1993-94,  funded partly
with surplus  moneys,  to assist the State in financing the 1994-95  fiscal year
costs of extraordinary litigation known or anticipated at that time; the opening
fund  balance in State fiscal year  1994-95 was $265  million.  The $241 million
change  in the  fund  balance  reflects  the use of $264  million  in the CRF as
planned, as well as the required deposit of $23 million to the Tax Stabilization
Reserve Fund. In addition, $278 million was on deposit in the tax refund reserve
account,  $250 million of which was deposited at the end of the State's  1994-95
fiscal year to continue  the process of  restructuring  the State's cash flow as
part of the LGAC program.

         Compared to the State  Financial Plan for 1994-95 as formulated on June
16,  1994,  reported  receipts  fell  short of  original  projections  by $1.163
billion,  primarily in the categories of personal  income and business taxes. Of
this amount, the personal income tax accounts for $800 million,  reflecting weak
estimated tax collections  and lower  withholding due to reduced wage and salary
growth,  more severe  reductions in brokerage  industry  bonuses than  projected
earlier, and deferral of capital gains realizations in anticipation of potential
Federal  tax  changes.  Business  taxes  fell short by $373  million,  primarily
reflecting  lower  payments  from  banks  as  substantial  overpayments  of 1993
liability depressed net collections in the 1994-95 fiscal year. These shortfalls
were offset by better performance in the remaining taxes,  particularly the user
taxes and fees, which exceeded projections by $210 million. Of this amount, $227
million  was  attributable  to certain  restatements  for  accounting  treatment
purposes  pertaining to the CRF and LGAC;  these  restatements  had no impact on
balance in the General Fund.

         Disbursements  were also  reduced  from  original  projections  by $848
million.  After adjusting for the net impact of restatements relating to the CRF
and LGAC  which  raised  disbursements  by $38  million,  the  variance  is $886
million.  Well over  two-thirds of this variance is in the category of grants to
local governments, primarily reflecting the conservative nature of the original


<PAGE>


                                      B-26

estimates  of projected  costs for social  services  and other  programs.  Lower
education  costs  are  attributable  to the  availability  of  $110  million  in
additional lottery proceeds and the use of LGAC bond proceeds.

         The spending  reductions also reflect $188 million in actions initiated
in January 1995 by the Governor to reduce  spending to avert a potential  gap in
the 1994-95 State Financial Plan.  These actions  included savings from a hiring
freeze,  halting the development of certain services, and the suspension of non-
essential  capital projects.  These actions,  together with $71 million in other
measures  comprised the Governor's $259 million  gap-closing plan,  submitted to
the Legislature in connection with the 1995-96 Executive Budget.

         1993-94 FISCAL YEAR

         The  State  ended its  1993-94  fiscal  year  with a balance  of $1.140
billion in the tax  refund  reserve  account,  $265  million in its  Contingency
Reserve Fund and $134 million in its Tax Stabilization  Reserve Fund. These fund
balances  were  primarily  the result of an improving  national  economy,  State
employment  growth,  tax  collections  that  exceeded  earlier  projections  and
disbursements that were below expectations.  Deposits to the personal income tax
refund reserve have the effect of reducing reported personal income tax receipts
in the fiscal year when made and withdrawals from such reserve increase receipts
in the fiscal year when made. The balance in the tax refund reserve account will
be used to pay taxpayer refunds, rather than drawing from 1994-95 receipts.

         1992-93 FISCAL YEAR

         The State ended its 1992-93  fiscal year with a balance of $671 million
in the tax refund  reserve  account  and $67  million  in the Tax  Stabilization
Reserve Fund. The State's 1992-93 fiscal year was  characterized  by performance
that was better than projected for the national and regional economies. National
gross  domestic  product,  State  personal  income,  and  State  employment  and
unemployment  performed  better than  originally  projected in April 1992.  This
favorable  economic  performance,  particularly  at year  end,  combined  with a
tax-induced  acceleration  of income  into 1992,  was the  primary  cause of the
General  Fund  surplus.  Personal  income  tax  collections  were more than $700
million  higher than  originally  projected  (before  reflecting  the tax refund
reserve account transaction), primarily in the withholding and estimated payment
components  of the  tax.  There  were,  however,  large  and  mainly  offsetting
variances in other categories of receipts.

CERTAIN LITIGATION

         Certain  litigation  pending  against  New  York  or  its  officers  or
employees  could have a  substantial  or  long-term  adverse  effect on New York
finances.  Among the more significant of these cases are those that involve: (i)
the  validity  of  agreements  and  treaties  by  which  various  Indian  tribes
transferred to New York title to certain land in New York;  (ii) certain aspects
of New  York's  Medicaid  rates and  regulations,  including  reimbursements  to
providers of mandatory and optional Medicaid  services,  and the eligibility for
and nature of home care  services;  (iii)  challenges  to  provisions of Section
2807-C of the Public  Health Law,  which  impose a 13%  surcharge  on  inpatient
hospital bills paid by commercial


<PAGE>


                                      B-27

insurers and employee  welfare  benefit  plans and portions of Chapter 55 of the
laws of 1992,  which  require  hospitals to impose and remit to the State an 11%
surcharge on hospital bills paid by commercial insurers and which require health
maintenance organizations to remit to the State a surcharge of up to 9%; (iv) an
action against the State of New York and New York City  officials  alleging that
the present  level of shelter  allowance  for public  assistance  recipients  is
inadequate under statutory standards to maintain proper housing;  (v) challenges
to the practice of  reimbursing  certain  Office of Mental  Health  patient care
expenses from the client's Social Security benefits; (vi) alleged responsibility
of New York officials to assist in remedying  racial  segregation in the City of
Yonkers; (vii) a challenge to the constitutionality of financing programs of the
Thruway  Authority  authorized by Chapters 166 and 410 of the Laws of 1991;  and
(viii)  a claim  that  the  State's  Department  of  Environmental  Conservation
prevented the  completion of a  cogeneration  facility by the projected  date by
failing  to  provide  data in a timely  manner  and that the  plaintiff  thereby
suffered  damages.  In  addition,  aspects of petroleum  business  taxes are the
subject of administrative claims and litigation.

THE CITY OF NEW YORK

         The fiscal  health of the State of New York is  closely  related to the
fiscal health of its localities,  particularly  the City, which has required and
continues to require significant  financial assistance from New York. The City's
independently audited operating results for each of its 1981 through 1993 fiscal
years  showed a General  Fund  surplus  reported  in  accordance  with GAAP.  In
addition,  the City's financial  statements for the 1993 fiscal year received an
unqualified  opinion  from  the  City's  independent   auditors,   the  eleventh
consecutive year the City received such an opinion.

         The 1996-1999  Financial Plan reflects a program of proposed actions by
the City to close the gaps between  projected  revenues and expenditures of $888
million, $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion for the 1997, 1998 and 1999 fiscal years,
respectively.  These actions, a substantial number of which are not specified in
detail,   include   additional   agency   spending   reductions,   reduction  in
entitlements,  government procurement  initiatives,  revenue initiatives and the
availability of the general reserve.

         The  Office of the State  Deputy  Comptroller  for the City of New York
(the "OSDC") and the State  Financial  Control Board continue  their  respective
budgetary oversight activities.

         In response to the City's fiscal crisis in 1975,  the State took action
to assist the City in returning to fiscal  stability.  Among those actions,  the
State established the Municipal Assistance  Corporation for the City of New York
(the  "MAC") to provide  financing  assistance  to the City;  the New York State
Financial  Control Board (the "Control  Board") to oversee the City's  financial
affairs;  the Office of the State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York to
assist the Control Board in exercising  its powers and  responsibilities;  and a
"Control  Period" from 1975 to 1986 during which the City was subject to certain
statutorily-prescribed  fiscal-monitoring  arrangements.  Although  the  Control
Board  terminated the Control Period in 1986 when certain  statutory  conditions
were met, thus suspending  certain Control Board powers,  the Control Board, MAC
and OSDC


<PAGE>


                                      B-28

continue to exercise various fiscal-monitoring functions over the City, and upon
the  occurrence or  "substantial  likelihood and imminence" of the occurrence of
certain events, including, but not limited to a City operating budget deficit of
more than $100  million,  the  Control  Board is  required  by law to reimpose a
Control Period.  Currently,  the City and its Covered Organizations (I.E., those
which  receive or may  receive  monies  from the City  directly,  indirectly  or
contingently)  operate under a four-year  financial plan which the City prepares
annually and periodically updates.

         The staffs of the OSDC and the Control Board issue periodic  reports on
the City's  financial  plans, as modified,  analyzing  forecasts of revenues and
expenditures,  cash flow, and debt service  requirements,  as well as compliance
with the financial plan, as modified, by the City and its Covered Organizations.
OSDC staff reports  issued during the  mid-1980's  noted that the City's budgets
benefitted  from a rapid rise in the City's  economy,  which  boosted the City's
collection of property,  business and income taxes. These resources were used to
increase the City's workforce and the scope of  discretionary  and mandated City
services. Subsequent OSDC staff reports examined the 1987 stock market crash and
the 1989-92  recession,  which  affected the New York City region more  severely
than the nation,  and  attributed  an erosion of City  revenues  and  increasing
strain on City expenditures to that recession.  According to a recent OSDC staff
report,  the  City's  economy is now  slowly  recovering,  but the scope of that
recovery is uncertain  and unlikely,  in the  foreseeable  future,  to match the
expansion of the mid-1980's.  Also,  staff reports of OSDC and the Control Board
have indicated that the City's recent balanced  budgets have been  accomplished,
in  part,  through  the  use  of  non-recurring  resources,  tax  increases  and
additional  State  assistance;  that the City has not yet brought its  long-term
expenditures  in line with  recurring  revenues;  and that the City is therefore
likely to continue to face future  projected  budget gaps  requiring the City to
increase revenues and/or reduce expenditures. According to the most recent staff
reports of OSDC and the Control  Board,  during the four-year  period covered by
the  current  financial  plan,  the City is  relying  on  obtaining  substantial
resources from  initiatives  needing  approval and  cooperation of its municipal
labor unions, Covered Organizations,  and City Council, as well as the State and
Federal governments, among others.

         The City  requires  significant  amounts of financing  for seasonal and
capital purposes.  The City issued $1.75 billion of notes for seasonal financing
purposes  during  its fiscal  year  ending  June 30,  1994.  The City's  capital
financing program projects long-term financing requirements of approximately $17
billion  for the  City's  fiscal  years 1995  through  1998.  The major  capital
requirements  include  expenditures  for the  City's  water  supply  and  sewage
disposal systems, roads, bridges, mass transit, schools, hospitals and housing.

OTHER LOCALITIES

         In  addition to the City,  certain  localities,  including  the City of
Yonkers,  could have financial problems leading to requests for additional State
assistance   during  the   State's   1995-96   fiscal   year  and   thereafter..
Municipalities  and school districts have engaged in substantial  short-term and
long-term  borrowings.  In 1993, the total indebtedness of all localities in the
State other than New York City was approximately $17.7 billion.


<PAGE>


                                      B-29


         From time to time, Federal  expenditure  reductions could reduce, or in
some cases, eliminate, Federal funding of some local programs, and, accordingly,
might  impose  substantial  increased   expenditure   requirements  on  affected
localities.  If the  State,  the City or any of the public  authorities  were to
suffer serious financial  difficulties  jeopardizing  their respective access to
the  public  credit  markets,  the  marketability  of notes and bonds  issued by
localities  within the State could be adversely  affected.  Localities also face
anticipated and potential  problems  resulting from certain pending  litigation,
judicial decisions and long-range economic trends. Long-range potential problems
of declining urban population, increasing expenditures and other economic trends
could adversely affect localities and require increasing State assistance in the
future.

AUTHORITIES

         The fiscal  stability of the State is related,  in part,  to the fiscal
stability of its public  authorities.  Public authorities are not subject to the
constitutional  restrictions  on the incurrence of debt which apply to the State
itself  and may issue  bonds and notes  within  the  amounts,  and as  otherwise
restricted by, their legislative authorization.  As of September 30, 1994, there
were 18 public authorities that had aggregate outstanding debt of $70.3 billion.
Some  authorities also receive moneys from State  appropriations  to pay for the
operating costs of certain of their programs.

         The Metropolitan Transit Authority (the "MTA"), which receives the bulk
of the appropriated moneys from the State,  oversees the operation of the City's
bus and subway system by its affiliates, the New York City Transit Authority and
Manhattan and Bronx  Surface  Transit  Operating  Authority  (collectively,  the
"TA"). The MTA has depended and will continue to depend upon Federal,  state and
local government support to operate the transit system because fare revenues are
insufficient.

         Over the past  several  years,  the State  has  enacted  several  taxes
(including  a surcharge  on the  profits of banks,  insurance  corporations  and
general business  corporations  doing business in the 12-county region served by
the MTA and a special  one-quarter  of one percent  regional  sales and use tax)
that provide additional revenues for mass transit purposes, including assistance
to the MTA.  In  addition,  a  one-quarter  of one  percent  regional  mortgages
recording  tax  paid on  certain  mortgages  creates  an  additional  source  of
recurring revenues for the MTA. Further,  in 1993, the State dedicated a portion
of the State  petroleum  business tax to assist the MTA.  For the 1995-96  State
fiscal year,  total State  assistance  to the MTA is estimated at  approximately
$1.1 billion.

         In 1993, State legislation  authorized the funding of a five-year $9.56
billion MTA capital plan for the five-year period, 1992 through 1996 (the "1992-
96 Capital  Program").  The MTA has  received  approval of the  1992-96  Capital
Program based on this legislation from the 1992-96 Capital Program Review Board,
as State law requires.  This is the third  five-year plan since the  Legislature
authorized  procedures  for the adoption,  approval and amendment of a five-year
plan in 1981 for a capital  program  designed to upgrade the  performance of the
MTA's  transportation  systems  and  to  supplement,  replace  and  rehabilitate
facilities and equipment.  The MTA, the Triborough  Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
and the TA are collectively authorized to issue an aggregate of $3.1 billion of


<PAGE>
                                      B-30


bonds (net of certain statutory  exclusions) to finance a portion of the 1992-96
Capital  Program.  The  1992-96  Capital  Program is  expected to be financed in
significant part through  dedication of State petroleum  business taxes referred
to above.

         There can be no assurance that all the necessary  governmental  actions
for the Capital Program will be taken, that funding sources currently identified
will not be decreased or eliminated,  or that the 1992-96  Capital  Program,  or
parts thereof, will not be delayed or reduced. Furthermore, the power of the MTA
to issue certain bonds  expected to be supported by the  appropriation  of State
petroleum  business taxes is currently the subject of a court challenge.  If the
Capital Program is delayed or reduced,  ridership and fare revenues may decline,
which could, among other things,  impair the MTA's ability to meet its operating
expenses without additional State assistance.


<PAGE>
                                      B-31


INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS


         The investment  restrictions  below have been adopted by the Portfolio.
Except where otherwise noted,  these investment  restrictions are  "fundamental"
policies  which,  under the 1940 Act,  may not be changed  without the vote of a
"majority of the outstanding  voting securities" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of
the Portfolio.  A "majority of the outstanding  voting securities" is defined in
the 1940 Act as the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the voting  securities  present
at a security holders meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding
voting  securities are present or represented by proxy,  or (b) more than 50% of
the outstanding voting securities.  The percentage  limitations contained in the
restrictions below apply at the time of the purchase of securities.


         Unless  Sections  8(b)(1)  and  13(a) of the 1940 Act or any SEC or SEC
staff interpretations thereof, are amended or modified, the Portfolio may not:

  1.     Purchase any  security  if, as a result,  more than 25% of the value of
         the Portfolio's total assets would be invested in securities of issuers
         having their principal business  activities in the same industry.  This
         limitation  shall not apply to obligations  issued or guaranteed by the
         U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities;

  2.     Borrow money, except that the Portfolio may (i) borrow money from banks
         for temporary or emergency  purposes (not for leveraging  purposes) and
         (ii) enter into reverse repurchase agreements for any purpose; provided
         that (i) and (ii) in total do not  exceed  33 1/3% of the  value of the
         Portfolio's   total  assets   (including  the  amount   borrowed)  less
         liabilities (other than borrowings). If at any time any borrowings come
         to exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the  Portfolio's  total  assets,  the
         Portfolio will reduce its borrowings  within three business days to the
         extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation;

  3.     Make  loans to other  persons,  except  through  the  purchase  of debt
         obligations,  loans  of  portfolio  securities,  and  participation  in
         repurchase agreements;

  4.     Purchase or sell  physical  commodities  or contracts  thereon,  unless
         acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, but
         the  Portfolio  may  purchase  or sell  futures  contracts  or  options
         (including  options  on futures  contracts,  but  excluding  options or
         futures  contracts on physical  commodities) and may enter into foreign
         currency forward contracts;

  5.     Purchase or sell real estate,  but the  Portfolio  may purchase or sell
         securities that are secured by real estate or issued


<PAGE>


                                      B-32


         by companies  (including real estate investment  trusts) that invest or
         deal in real estate;

  6.     Underwrite  securities  of other  issuers,  except  to the  extent  the
         Portfolio,  in  disposing  of  portfolio  securities,  may be deemed an
         underwriter within the meaning of the 1933 Act; and

  7.     Issue senior securities,  except as permitted under the 1940 Act or any
         rule, order or interpretation thereunder.

         NON-FUNDAMENTAL  INVESTMENT  RESTRICTIONS.  The investment restrictions
described below are not fundamental policies of the Portfolio and may be changed
by the Trustees.  These  non-fundamental  investment  policies  require that the
Portfolio may not:

  1.     Acquire securities of other investment  companies,  except as permitted
         by the 1940 Act or any rule, order or interpretation  thereunder, or in
         connection with a merger, consolidation, reorganization, acquisition of
         assets or an offer of exchange;

  2.     Acquire any illiquid  securities,  such as repurchase  agreements  with
         more than seven days to maturity or fixed time deposits with a duration
         of over seven calendar days, if as a result  thereof,  more than 15% of
         the  market  value  of  the  Portfolio's   total  assets  would  be  in
         investments that are illiquid;

  3.     Sell any  security  short,  unless  it owns or has the  right to obtain
         securities  equivalent  in kind and  amount to the  securities  sold or
         unless it covers such short  sales as required by the current  rules or
         positions of the SEC or its staff.  Transactions  in futures  contracts
         and options shall not constitute selling securities short;

  4.     Purchase  securities on margin, but the Portfolio may obtain such short
         term credits as may be necessary for the clearance of transactions;

         There  will  be no  violation  of any  investment  restriction  if that
restriction  is  complied  with  at  the  time  the  relevant  action  is  taken
notwithstanding a later change in market value of an investment, in net or total
assets, in the securities rating of the investment, or any other later change.


ITEM 14.  MANAGEMENT OF THE  PORTFOLIO.


         The Trustees  and officers of the  Portfolio  and their  addresses  and
principal  occupations  during  the past five years are set forth  below.  Their
titles may have varied during that period. An asterisk  indicates that a Trustee
is an "interested person" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Portfolio.


<PAGE>


                                      B-33



                             TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS


         


         FREDERICK S. ADDY -- Trustee;  Retired;  Executive  Vice  President and
Chief  Financial  Officer from January  1990 to April 1994,  Amoco  Corporation;
Director, Ensearch Corp. (natural gas), since 1994. His address is 19129 RR 2147
W. Horseshoe Bay, TX 78654.

         WILLIAM G. BURNS -- Trustee;  Retired;  Limited Partner, Galen Partners
L.P. and Vice Chairman,  Galen Associates,  since 1990; Chief Executive Officer,
Galen  Associates and General  Partner,  Galen  Partners  L.P.,  until 1991. His
address is 4241 S.W. Parkgate Blvd., Palm City, FL 34990.

         ARTHUR C.  ESCHENLAUER  -- Trustee;  Retired;  Senior  Vice  President,
Morgan  Guaranty  Trust  Company of New York until 1987.  His address is 14 Alta
Vista Drive, RD #2, Princeton, NJ 08540.

         MATTHEW  HEALEY(*) -- Trustee ; Chairman and Chief  Executive  Officer;
Chairman,  Pierpont  Group,  Inc.,  since  1989;  Chairman  and Chief  Executive
Officer,  Execution Services, Inc. until October 1991 . His address is Pine Tree
Club Estates, 10286 Saint Andrew Road, Boynton Beach, FL 33436.

         MICHAEL  P.  MALLARDI  --  Trustee;  Senior  Vice  President,   Capital
Cities/ABC, Inc., President, Broadcast Group, since 1986. His address is 77 West
66th Street, New York, NY 10017.

         Each Trustee is paid an annual fee as follows for serving as Trustee of
the Portfolio,  The Pierpont  Funds,  The JPM  Institutional  Funds , The Series
Portfolio and each registered investment company in which series of the Pierpont
Funds or JPM Institutional Funds invest, and is



<PAGE>


                                      B-34



reimbursed for expenses  incurred in connection  with service as a Trustee.  The
compensation  paid to the  Trustees in  calendar  1994 is set forth  below.  The
Trustees may hold various other directorships unrelated to the Portfolio.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 AGGREGATE        PENSION                                          TOTAL COMPENSATION FROM
                                 COMPENSATION     OR RETIREMENT                                    THE PORTFOLIO, THE
                                 FROM THE         BENEFITS                   ESTIMATED             PIERPONT FUNDS AND THE JPM
                                 PORTFOLIO        ACCRUED AS PART            ANNUAL BENEFITS       INSTITUTIONAL FUND PAID
                                 DURING 1994      OF FUND EXPENSES           UPON RETIREMENTS      TO TRUSTEES DURING 1994
<S>                              <C>              <C>                        <C>                   <C>

Frederick S. Addy,               $4,372           None                       None                  $55,000
Trustee

William G. Burns, Trustee        $4,372           None                       None                  $55,000
                                                                                                           

Arthur C. Eschenlauer, Trustee   $4,372           None                       None                  $55,000
Matthew Healey, Trustee(*),
  Chairman and Chief Executive
  Officer                        $4,372           None                       None                  $55,000


Michael P. Mallardi, Trustee     $4,372           None                       None                  $55,000
                                                                                                           



<FN>

(*) During 1994,  Pierpont Group,  Inc. paid Mr. Healey, in his role as Chairman
of Pierpont Group,  Inc.,  compensation  in the amount of $130,000,  contributed
$19,500  to a  defined  contribution  plan on his  behalf  and paid  $20,000  in
insurance premiums for his benefit.
</FN> 
</TABLE>

         As of April 1, 1995 the annual fee paid to each  Trustee for serving as
a Trustee of the Trust,  each of the  Portfolios,  The Series  Portfolio and The
Pierpont Funds was adjusted to $65,000.

         In accordance with  applicable  state  requirements,  a majority of the
disinterested Trustees have adopted written procedures reasonably appropriate to
deal with  potential  conflicts of interest  arising from the fact that the same
individuals  are Trustees of the  Portfolio  and The Pierpont  Funds and The JPM
Institutional Funds up to and including creating a separate board of trustees.

         The Trustees of the Portfolio,  in addition to reviewing actions of the
Portfolio's  various service  providers,  decide upon matters of general policy.
The Portfolio has entered into a Fund Services  Agreement  with Pierpont  Group,
Inc.  to  assist  the  Trustees  in   exercising   their   overall   supervisory
responsibilities for the Portfolio's affairs. Pierpont Group, Inc. was organized
in July 1989 to provide services for The Pierpont Funds 



<PAGE>


                                      B-35




(currently  an  investor  in the  Portfolio).  The  Portfolio  has agreed to pay
Pierpont Group,  Inc. a fee in an amount  representing  its reasonable  costs in
performing  these  services.  These  costs  are  periodically  reviewed  by  the
Trustees.  For the period April 11, 1994  (commencement  of operations)  through
March 31, 1995 the aggregate fees paid to Pierpont Group, Inc. were $4,140.  The
Portfolio has no employees; its executive officers (listed below) other than the
Chief Executive Officer are provided and compensated by Signature  Broker-Dealer
Services, Inc. ("SBDS"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Signature Financial Group,
Inc. ("Signature").  The Portfolio's officers conduct and supervise the business
operations of the Portfolio.

         The officers of the Portfolio and their  principal  occupations  during
the past five years are set forth  below.  The  business  address of each of the
officers unless otherwise noted is Signature Broker-Dealer Services, Inc., 6 St.
James Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.

         MATTHEW HEALEY;  Chief  Executive  Officer;  Chairman,  Pierpont Group,
Inc., since 1989; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Execution Services, Inc.
until October 1991.  His address is Pine Tree Club Estates,  10286 Saint Andrews
Road, Boynton Beach, FL 33436.

         PHILIP W. COOLIDGE;  President;  Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and
President, Signature since December 1988 and SBDS since April 1989.

         JAMES B. CRAVER;  Treasurer and  Secretary;  Senior Vice  President and
General Counsel,  Signature since January 1991;  Secretary,  SBDS since February
1991; Partner, Baker & Hostetler prior to January 1991.

         DAVID G. DANIELSON;  Assistant Treasurer;  Assistant Manager, Signature
since May 1991;  Graduate  Student,  Northeastern  University from April 1990 to
March 1991.

         LINDA T.  GIBSON;  Assistant  Secretary;  Legal  Counsel and  Assistant
Secretary,  Signature since June 1991; Assistant Secretary,  SBDS since November
1992; law student, Boston University School of Law prior to May 1992.

         JAMES E. HOOLAHAN;  Vice President;  Senior Vice  President,  Signature
since December 1989.

 



<PAGE>


                                      B-36




         SUSAN  JAKUBOSKI;  Assistant  Secretary and Assistant  Treasurer of the
Portfolios  only;  Manager  and Senior  Fund  Administrator,  SFG and  Signature
(Cayman) (since August 1994); Assistant Treasurer,  SBDS (since September 1994);
Fund Compliance Administrator, Concord Financial Group, Inc. (from November 1990
to  August  1994);  Senior  Fund  Accountant,   Neuberger  &  Berman  Management
Incorporated  (since prior to 1990).  Her address is P.O. Box 2494,  Elizabethan
Square, George Town, Grand Cayman , Cayman Islands, B.W.I.

         JAMES S. LELKO;  Assistant  Treasurer ;  Assistant  Manager,  Signature
since January 1993;  Senior Tax Compliance  Accountant,  Putnam  Companies since
prior to December 1992.

         THOMAS M. LENZ;  Assistant  Secretary;  Vice  President  and  Associate
General Counsel,  Signature since November 1989; Assistant Secretary, SBDS since
February 1991.

         MOLLY S.  MUGLER;  Assistant  Secretary;  Legal  Counsel and  Assistant
Secretary,  Signature since December 1988; Assistant Secretary, SBDS since April
1989.

         ANDRES E.  SALDANA;  Assistant  Secretary;  Legal Counsel and Assistant
Secretary,  Signature  since  November  1992;  Assistant  Secretary,  SBDS since
September 1993; Attorney, Ropes & Gray from September 1990 to November 1992.

         DANIEL  E.  SHEA;  Assistant  Treasurer;   Assistant  Manager  of  Fund
Administration,  Signature since November 1993;  Supervisor and Senior Technical
Advisor, Putnam Investments since prior to 1990.





<PAGE>


                                      B-37




         Messrs. Coolidge, Craver, Danielson, Hoolahan, Lelko, Lenz, Saldana and
Shea and Mss.  Gibson,  Mugler and  Jakuboski  hold similar  positions for other
investment  companies  for  which  SBDS  or an  affiliate  serves  as  principal
underwriter. 


         The  Portfolio's  Declaration  of Trust provides that it will indemnify
its  Trustees  and  officers  against   liabilities  and  expenses  incurred  in
connection  with  litigation  in which  they may be  involved  because  of their
offices with the  Portfolio,  unless,  as to  liability to the  Portfolio or its
investors,  it is finally  adjudicated that they engaged in wilful  misfeasance,
bad faith,  gross  negligence  or reckless  disregard of the duties  involved in
their  offices,  or  unless  with  respect  to any other  matter  it is  finally
adjudicated  that they did not act in good faith in the  reasonable  belief that
their  actions  were in the  best  interests  of the  Portfolio.  In the case of
settlement,  such  indemnification  will  not be  provided  unless  it has  been
determined  by  a  court  or  other  body  approving  the  settlement  or  other
disposition,  or by a reasonable  determination,  based upon a review of readily
available facts, by vote of a majority of disinterested Trustees or in a written
opinion of independent counsel,  that such officers or Trustees have not engaged
in wilful  misfeasance,  bad faith,  gross  negligence or reckless  disregard of
their duties.

ITEM 15.  CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES.


         As of July 25, 1995, The JPM  Institutional  New York Total Return Bond
Fund and The Pierpont New York Total Return Bond Fund (the  "Funds"),  series of
The JPM Institutional  Funds and The Pierpont Funds,  respectively,  owned 42.2%
and 57.6%, respectively,  of the outstanding interests in the Portfolio. So long
as each of these Funds controls the Portfolio,  it may take actions  without the
approval of any other investors.


         Each of the  Funds has  informed  the  Portfolio  that  whenever  it is
requested to vote on matters pertaining to the Portfolio (other than a vote by a
Fund to continue the operation of the Portfolio  upon the  withdrawal of another
investor in the Portfolio),  it will hold a meeting of its shareholders and will
cast its vote as instructed by those shareholders.

ITEM 16.  INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES.


         INVESTMENT  ADVISOR.  The investment advisor to the Portfolio is Morgan
Guaranty,  a wholly owned  subsidiary of J.P. Morgan & Co.  Incorporated  ("J.P.
Morgan"),  a bank  holding  company  organized  under  the laws of the  State of
Delaware.  Morgan Guaranty,  whose principal offices are at 60 Wall Street,  New
York,  New York  10260,  is a New York trust  company  which  conducts a general
banking and trust business.  Morgan Guaranty is subject to regulation by the New
York State Banking Department and is a



<PAGE>


                                      B-38



member bank of the Federal Reserve System.  Through offices in New York City and
abroad,  Morgan  Guaranty  offers  a  wide  range  of  services,   primarily  to
governmental,  institutional,  corporate and high net worth individual customers
in the United States and throughout the world.

         J.P.  Morgan,  through  the  Advisor  and other  subsidiaries,  acts as
investment advisor to individuals,  governments,  corporations, employee benefit
plans, mutual funds and other institutional investors with combined assets under
management of $150 billion (of which the Advisor advises over $30 billion).

         J.P.  Morgan has a long history of service as adviser,  underwriter and
lender to an extensive  roster of major companies and as a financial  advisor to
national  governments.  The firm,  through its  predecessor  firms,  has been in
business for over a century and has been managing investments since 1913.

         The  basis of  Morgan  Guaranty's  investment  process  is  fundamental
investment  research as the firm believes that fundamentals  should determine an
asset's value over the long term.  J.P. Morgan  currently  employs over 100 full
time  research  analysts,  among  the  largest  research  staffs  in  the  money
management industry, in its investment management divisions located in New York,
London, Tokyo, Frankfurt, Melbourne and Singapore to cover companies, industries
and countries on site. In addition,  the investment  management divisions employ
approximately 300 capital market  researchers,  portfolio  managers and traders.
The  Advisor's  fixed  income  investment  process is based on  analysis of real
rates, sector diversification and quantitative and credit analysis.

         The investment  advisory services the Advisor provides to the Portfolio
are not exclusive under the terms of the Advisory Agreement. The Advisor is free
to and does render similar  investment  advisory services to others. The Advisor
serves  as  investment  advisor  to  personal  investors  and  other  investment
companies and acts as fiduciary for trusts,  estates and employee benefit plans.
Certain of the assets of trusts and estates  under  management  are  invested in
common trust funds for which the Advisor  serves as trustee.  The accounts which
are managed or advised by the Advisor have varying investment objectives and the
Advisor invests assets of such accounts in investments substantially similar to,
or the same as, those which are expected to constitute the principal investments
of the Portfolio.  Such accounts are supervised by officers and employees of the
Advisor who may also be acting in similar capacities for the Portfolio. See Item
17 below.

         J.P. Morgan  Investment  Management  Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
J.P. Morgan , is a registered  investment adviser under the Investment  Advisers
Act of 1940, as amended, which manages employee benefit funds of corporations,



<PAGE>


                                      B-39



labor  unions  and  state  and  local  governments  and the  accounts  of  other
institutional investors,  including investment companies.  Certain of the assets
of employee  benefit  accounts  under its  management are invested in commingled
pension  trust  funds for which the  Advisor  serves  as  trustee.  J.P.  Morgan
Investment  Management Inc.  advises the Advisor on investment of the commingled
pension trust funds.

         The  Portfolio is managed by officers of the Advisor who, in acting for
their  customers,  including  the  Portfolio,  do not discuss  their  investment
decisions with any personnel of J.P.  Morgan or any personnel of other divisions
of the Advisor or with any of its affiliated persons, with the exception of J.P.
Morgan  Investment  Management  Inc.,  which  provides  securities  trading  and
investment  research  services  for Morgan  Guaranty's  investment  advisory and
fiduciary accounts.  See Item 17 below for a description of services provided to
the Portfolio by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.

         As compensation for the services  rendered and related expenses such as
salaries  of  advisory  personnel  borne by the  Advisor  under  the  Investment
Advisory Agreement,  the Portfolio has agreed to pay the Advisor a fee, which is
computed daily and may be paid monthly, equal to the annual rate of 0.30% of the
Portfolio's   average   daily  net  assets.   For  the  period  April  11,  1994
(commencement  of  operations)  through March 31, 1995 the Portfolio paid Morgan
Guaranty $120,281 in advisory fees.

         The  Investment  Advisory  Agreement  provides that it will continue in
effect for a period of two years after execution only if  specifically  approved
annually  thereafter  (i)  by a  vote  of  the  holders  of a  majority  of  the
Portfolio's  outstanding  securities  or by its Trustees and (ii) by a vote of a
majority  of the  Trustees  who are not  parties to the  Advisory  Agreement  or
"interested  persons"  as  defined  by the 1940 Act cast in  person at a meeting
called  for the  purpose of voting on such  approval.  The  Investment  Advisory
Agreement will terminate automatically if assigned and is terminable at any time
without penalty by a vote of a majority of the Trustees of the Portfolio or by a
vote of the holders of a majority of the  Portfolio's  voting  securities  on 60
days'  written  notice to the  Advisor  and by the  Advisor on 90 days'  written
notice to the Portfolio.


         The  Glass-Steagall  Act and other  applicable laws generally  prohibit
banks such as Morgan  Guaranty from engaging in the business of  underwriting or
distributing  securities,  and the Board of  Governors  of the  Federal  Reserve
System has issued an  interpretation  to the effect that under these laws a bank
holding company registered under the federal Bank Holding Company Act or certain
subsidiaries thereof may not sponsor, organize, or control a registered open-end
investment company continuously


<PAGE>


                                      B-40


engaged in the issuance of its shares, such as the Portfolio. The interpretation
does not  prohibit a holding  company or a  subsidiary  thereof  from  acting as
investment advisor and custodian to such an investment company.  Morgan Guaranty
believes that it may perform the services for the Portfolio  contemplated by the
Advisory  Agreement  without  violation  of  the  Glass-Steagall  Act  or  other
applicable banking laws or regulations. State laws on this issue may differ from
the interpretation of relevant federal law, and banks and financial institutions
may be  required  to register  as dealers  pursuant  to state  securities  laws.
However,  it is possible that future changes in either federal or state statutes
and  regulations  concerning  the  permissible  activities  of  banks  or  trust
companies,  as  well  as  further  judicial  or  administrative   decisions  and
interpretations  of present and future statutes and  regulations,  might prevent
Morgan Guaranty from continuing to perform such services for the Portfolio.

         If Morgan Guaranty were prohibited from acting as investment advisor to
the Portfolio, it is expected that the Trustees of the Portfolio would recommend
to investors  that they approve the  Portfolio's  entering into a new investment
advisory  agreement with another  qualified  investment  advisor selected by the
Trustees.

         Morgan  Guaranty also receives  compensation  from the Portfolio in its
capacity as Services Agent to the Portfolio.

         ADMINISTRATOR. SBDS serves as the Portfolio's Administrator and in that
capacity  administers  and  manages all  aspects of the  Portfolio's  day-to-day
operations subject to the supervision of the Trustees, except as set forth under
"Investment  Advisor,"  "Services Agent" and "Custodian." In connection with its
responsibilities  as  Administrator,  SBDS (i) furnishes  ordinary  clerical and
related  services for  day-to-day  operations  including  certain record keeping
responsibilities;  (ii) takes  responsibility for compliance with all applicable
federal  and state  securities  and  other  regulatory  requirements  including,
without  limitation,  preparing  and  mailing  and filing  (but not paying  for)
registration statements,  and information statements and all required reports to
the Portfolio's investors,  the SEC, and state securities  commissions,  if any,
(but not the  Portfolio's  federal and state tax returns);  (iii)  performs such
administrative  and managerial  oversight of the  activities of the  Portfolio's
custodian, as the Trustees may direct from time to time.


         Under   the   Portfolio's    Administration   Agreement,   the   annual
administration  fee rate is calculated based on the aggregate  average daily net
assets of the  Portfolio,  as well as all of the other  portfolios  (the "Master
Funds") in which series of The Pierpont Funds,  The JPM  Institutional  Funds or
The JPM Advisor  Funds invest.  The fee is  calculated  in  accordance  with the
following schedule: 0.010% of the first



<PAGE>


                                      B-41



$1 billion of these portfolios'  aggregate  average daily net assets,  0.008% of
the next $2 billion of these  portfolios'  aggregate  average  daily net assets,
0.006% of the next $2 billion of these  portfolios'  aggregate average daily net
assets,  and 0.004% of these  portfolios'  aggregate average daily net assets in
excess  of $5  billion.  This  fee is  then  applied  to the net  assets  of the
Portfolio  and the Master  Funds.  The  Administrator  may  voluntarily  waive a
portion of its fees. For the period April 11, 1994  (commencement of operations)
through March 31, 1995 the Portfolio paid SBDS $2,563 in administration fees.


         The Administration  Agreement may be renewed or amended by the Trustees
without a investor vote. The Administration  Agreement is terminable at any time
without  penalty by a vote of a majority of the  Trustees of the  Portfolio,  as
applicable,  on not more  than 60 days'  written  notice  nor less than 30 days'
written notice to the other party.  The  Administrator  may  subcontract for the
performance of its obligations  under the  Administration  Agreement only if the
Trustees  approve  such  subcontract  and  find the  subcontracting  party to be
qualified  to perform  the  obligations  sought to be  subcontracted,  provided,
however, that unless the Portfolio, as applicable,  expressly agrees in writing,
the  Administrator  shall be fully responsible for the acts and omissions of any
subcontractor as it would for its own acts or omissions.


         SERVICES  AGENT.  The  Portfolio  has entered into a Financial and Fund
Accounting  Services  Agreement (the "Services  Agreement") with Morgan Guaranty
pursuant  to which  Morgan  Guaranty  performs  two  types of  services  for the
Portfolio.  First, Morgan Guaranty is responsible for certain financial and fund
accounting  services  provided to the Portfolio.  The services to be provided by
Morgan Guaranty under this Services Agreement  include,  but are not limited to,
monitoring  the  fund  accounting  activities  of  the  Portfolio's   Custodian,
assisting the Administrator in the preparation of the Portfolio's annual audits,
assisting in the development the Portfolio's budget and establishing their rates
of expense accruals,  monitoring the activities of the Portfolio's  custodian in
certain matters such as daily income  accruals,  trade reporting,  pricing,  and
performance calculations, and providing other related services.


         Second,  Morgan  Guaranty is  responsible  for the annual  costs to the
Portfolio  of  certain  usual  and  customary  services  costs  incurred  by the
Portfolio  (the  "Expense  Undertaking").  The  expenses  covered by the Expense
Undertaking  include,  but are not limited to,  transfer,  registrar,  legal and
accounting  expenses,  the fees of the Administrator,  the cost of any liability
insurance or fidelity bonds, the compensation and expenses of its Trustees,  the
expenses of printing and mailing reports, notices, and information statements to
Portfolio investors, interest charges, membership dues in the Investment Company
Institute,  and investor  meeting fees.  The Portfolio  will pay these  expenses
directly and such amounts will be deducted from the fee to be


<PAGE>


                                      B-42


paid to Morgan Guaranty under this Services Agreement.  If such amounts are more
than the amount of Morgan Guaranty's fees under the Services  Agreement,  Morgan
Guaranty will reimburse the Portfolio for such excess amounts.


         The  administration and operation expenses of the Portfolio not covered
by the Expense Undertaking, and for which the Portfolio is responsible,  include
the fees of Pierpont  Group,  Inc.,  the  services  agent fee,  custodian  fees,
advisory fees or expenses  otherwise  incurred in connection with the management
and  reinvestment  of  the  Portfolio's  assets,  expenses  connected  with  the
execution,   recording,  and  settlement  of  portfolio  security  transactions,
organization  expenses and  extraordinary  expenses as defined in such  Services
Agreement.

         Under the Portfolio's  Services Agreement,  the Portfolio has agreed to
pay Morgan  Guaranty for these  services a fee,  computed daily and which may be
paid monthly, equal to the following annual percentage rate of the average daily
net assets of the Portfolio: 0.10% on the first $200 million in assets, 0.05% on
the next $200 million in assets, and 0.03% thereafter.  For the period April 11,
1994  (commencement  of  operations)  through  March 31, 1995 the  Portfolio was
reimbursed  $11,830 by Morgan  Guaranty  for expenses in excess of its fees paid
under the Services  Agreement.  As noted  immediately  above,  both of these fee
levels  reflect  payments  made  directly to third  parties by the Portfolio for
expenses  covered by the  Expense  Undertaking,  as well as  payments  to Morgan
Guaranty  for  services  rendered  under the  Services  Agreement.  The Trustees
regularly  review amounts paid to and accounted for by Morgan Guaranty  pursuant
to this Services Agreement.  Under the Services  Agreement,  Morgan Guaranty may
delegate one or more of its responsibilities to other entities,  including SBDS,
at Morgan Guaranty's  expense.  The Services  Agreement may be terminated at any
time, without penalty,  by the Trustees or Morgan Guaranty,  in each case on not
more than 60 days' nor less than 30 days' written notice to the other party.

         CUSTODIAN.  State Street Bank and Trust Company  ("State  Street"),  40
King Street West,  Toronto,  Ontario,  Canada M5H 3Y8, serves as the Portfolio's
Custodian  and  Transfer  Agent.  Pursuant to the  Custodian  Contract  with the
Portfolio,  State Street is responsible for maintaining the books and records of
portfolio  transactions  and  holding the  portfolio  securities  and cash.  The
Custodian  has also  entered into  subcustodian  agreements  with Bankers  Trust
Company  for the  purpose  of  holding  TENR Notes and with Bank of New York and
Chemical  Bank,  N.A. for the purpose of holding  certain  variable  rate demand
notes.  In the case of  foreign  assets  held  outside  the United  States,  the
Custodian employs various subcustodians who were approved by the Trustees of the
Portfolio in accordance with the regulations of the SEC.



<PAGE>


                                      B-43


         As Transfer Agent, State Street is responsible for maintaining  account
records detailing the ownership of interests in the Portfolio.  The Portfolio is
responsible for the fees of the Custodian and Transfer Agent for the Portfolio.


         INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS.  Price Waterhouse L.L.P.,  1177 Avenue of the
Americas,  New  York,  New York  10036,  serves as the  Portfolio's  independent
accountants  providing audit and accounting services including (i) conducting an
annual audit of the financial statements of the Portfolio, (ii) assisting in the
preparation  and/or  review of the  Portfolio's  federal  and state  income  tax
returns and (iii)  consulting with the Portfolio as to matters of accounting and
federal and state income taxation.


ITEM 17.  BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES.

         J.P.  Morgan  Investment  Management  Inc.,  acting as agent for Morgan
Guaranty,  places  orders  for the  Portfolio  for all  purchases  and  sales of
portfolio  securities.  Morgan Guaranty  enters into  repurchase  agreements and
reverse repurchase  agreements for the Portfolio and executes loans of portfolio
securities on behalf of the Portfolio. See Item 13 above.

         Fixed  income and debt  securities  and  municipal  bonds and notes are
generally  traded at a net price with dealers  acting as principal for their own
accounts without a stated commission. The price of the security usually includes
profit to the dealers. In underwritten offerings,  securities are purchased at a
fixed  price  which  includes  an amount  of  compensation  to the  underwriter,
generally referred to as the underwriter's  concession or discount. On occasion,
certain  securities may be purchased  directly from an issuer,  in which case no
commissions or discounts are paid.

         Portfolio transactions for the Portfolio will be undertaken principally
to accomplish the Portfolio's objective in relation to expected movements in the
general level of interest rates.  The Portfolio may engage in short term trading
consistent  with its  objective.  The  Portfolio  expects  its annual  portfolio
turnover rates will be less than 100%. In connection with portfolio transactions
for the Portfolio,  J.P. Morgan Investment  Management Inc. intends to seek best
price and  execution  on a  competitive  basis for both  purchases  and sales of
securities.


         For the period  April 11, 1994  (commencement  of  operations)  through
March 31, 1995 the Portfolio's  portfolio  turnover rate was 63%. A rate of 100%
indicates  that the equivalent of all of the  Portfolio's  assets have been sold
and reinvested in a year. High portfolio  turnover may result in the realization
of substantial net capital gains or losses.


         Subject to the overriding objective of obtaining the best


<PAGE>


                                      B-44


possible execution of orders, J.P. Morgan Investment  Management Inc., or Morgan
Guaranty as the case may be, may allocate a portion of the Portfolio's portfolio
brokerage transactions to affiliates of Morgan Guaranty. In order for affiliates
of Morgan Guaranty to effect any portfolio  transactions for the Portfolio,  the
commissions,  fees or other  remuneration  received by such  affiliates  must be
reasonable  and fair compared to the  commissions,  fees, or other  remuneration
paid to other  brokers in  connection  with  comparable  transactions  involving
similar  securities  being  purchased or sold on a securities  exchange during a
comparable period of time. Furthermore, the Trustees of the Portfolio, including
a majority  of the  Trustees  who are not  "interested  persons,"  have  adopted
procedures which are reasonably designed to provide that any commissions,  fees,
or other  remuneration paid to such affiliates are consistent with the foregoing
standard.

         The  Portfolio's  portfolio  securities  will not be purchased  from or
through or sold to or through the Portfolio's Administrator, Exclusive Placement
Agent or Advisor or any  "affiliated  person" as defined in the 1940 Act, of the
Administrator,  Exclusive  Placement  Agent or Advisor  when such  entities  are
acting as principals,  except to the extent  permitted by law. In addition,  the
Portfolio will not purchase  securities during the existence of any underwriting
group relating  thereto of which the Advisor or an affiliate of the Advisor is a
member, except to the extent permitted by law.

         On those occasions when Morgan Guaranty deems the purchase or sale of a
security  to be in the  best  interests  of  the  Portfolio  as  well  as  other
investors,  J.P. Morgan  Investment  Management Inc., to the extent permitted by
applicable  laws and  regulations,  may, but is not obligated to,  aggregate the
securities to be sold or purchased  for the  Portfolio  with those to be sold or
purchased for other customers in order to obtain best execution, including lower
brokerage  commissions  if  appropriate.   In  such  event,  allocation  of  the
securities  so  purchased  or  sold  as well  as any  expenses  incurred  in the
transaction  will be made by J.P. Morgan  Investment  Management Inc., or Morgan
Guaranty as the case may be, in the manner it considers to be most equitable and
consistent with Morgan  Guaranty's  fiduciary  obligations to the Portfolio.  In
some instances, this procedure might adversely affect the Portfolio.

         If the Portfolio effects a closing purchase transaction with respect to
an option written by it, normally such  transaction will be executed by the same
broker-dealer who executed the sale of the option. The writing of options by the
Portfolio  will be subject to  limitations  established by each of the exchanges
governing the maximum  number of options in each class which may be written by a
single investor or group of investors  acting in concert,  regardless of whether
the  options  are  written  on the same or  different  exchanges  or are held or
written in one or more  accounts or through one or more  brokers.  The number of
options


<PAGE>


                                      B-45


which the Portfolio may write may be affected by options  written by the Advisor
for other investment  advisory clients. An exchange may order the liquidation of
positions found to be in excess of these limits, and it may impose certain other
sanctions.

ITEM 18.  CAPITAL STOCK AND OTHER SECURITIES.

         Under the  Declaration  of Trust,  the Trustees are authorized to issue
beneficial interests in the Portfolio. Investors are entitled to participate pro
rata in distributions of taxable income, loss, gain and credit of the Portfolio.
Upon  liquidation or  dissolution  of the  Portfolio,  investors are entitled to
share pro rata in the Portfolio's net assets  available for  distribution to its
investors.  Investments  in  the  Portfolio  have  no  preference,   preemptive,
conversion or similar rights and are fully paid and nonassessable, except as set
forth below.  Investments in the Portfolio may not be transferred.  Certificates
representing an investor's  beneficial interest in the Portfolio are issued only
upon the written request of an investor.

         Each  investor is entitled to a vote in proportion to the amount of its
investment in the Portfolio.  Investors in the Portfolio do not have  cumulative
voting rights,  and investors holding more than 50% of the aggregate  beneficial
interest in the  Portfolio may elect all of the Trustees if they choose to do so
and in such  event the other  investors  in the  Portfolio  would not be able to
elect any Trustee. The Portfolio is not required and has no current intention to
hold annual  meetings of investors but the Portfolio will hold special  meetings
of investors when in the judgment of the Portfolio's Trustees it is necessary or
desirable to submit matters for an investor  vote. No material  amendment may be
made to the Portfolio's  Declaration of Trust without the  affirmative  majority
vote of investors  (with the vote of each being in  proportion  to the amount of
its investment).

         The Portfolio may enter into a merger or consolidation,  or sell all or
substantially  all of its  assets,  if approved by the vote of two thirds of its
investors  (with the vote of each being in proportion  to its  percentage of the
beneficial  interests in the Portfolio),  except that if the Trustees  recommend
such sale of assets,  the approval by vote of a majority of the investors  (with
the  vote of each  being  in  proportion  to its  percentage  of the  beneficial
interests  of the  Portfolio)  will be  sufficient.  The  Portfolio  may also be
terminated (i) upon  liquidation  and  distribution of its assets if approved by
the  vote of two  thirds  of its  investors  (with  the  vote of each  being  in
proportion to the amount of its  investment)  or (ii) by the Trustees by written
notice to its investors.

         The  Portfolio  is  organized as a trust under the laws of the State of
New York.  Investors in the  Portfolio  will be held  personally  liable for its
obligations and liabilities, subject,


<PAGE>


                                      B-46


however,  to indemnification by the Portfolio in the event that there is imposed
upon an investor a greater  portion of the  liabilities  and  obligations of the
Portfolio  than its  proportionate  beneficial  interest in the  Portfolio.  The
Declaration of Trust also provides that the Portfolio shall maintain appropriate
insurance (for example, fidelity bonding and errors and omissions insurance) for
the protection of the Portfolio, its investors,  Trustees,  officers,  employees
and agents covering  possible tort and other  liabilities.  Thus, the risk of an
investor incurring financial loss on account of investor liability is limited to
circumstances  in which both  inadequate  insurance  existed  and the  Portfolio
itself was unable to meet its obligations.

         The Portfolio's  Declaration of Trust further provides that obligations
of the  Portfolio are not binding upon the Trustees  individually  but only upon
the property of the  Portfolio  and that the Trustees will not be liable for any
action or failure to act,  but nothing in the  Declaration  of Trust  protects a
Trustee  against any liability to which he would  otherwise be subject by reason
of wilful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the
duties involved in the conduct of his office.

ITEM 19.  PURCHASE, REDEMPTION AND PRICING OF SECURITIES.

         Beneficial  interests  in the  Portfolio  are issued  solely in private
placement  transactions  that do not involve any  "public  offering"  within the
meaning of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.


         Portfolio  securities  with a  maturity  of 60 days or more,  including
securities that are listed on an exchange or traded over the counter, are valued
using prices  supplied daily by an independent  pricing service or services that
(i) are based on the last sale price on a national  securities  exchange  or, in
the absence of recorded  sales,  at the readily  available  closing bid price on
such exchange or at the quoted bid price in the over-the-counter market, if such
exchange or market constitutes the broadest and most  representative  market for
the  security  and  (ii) in other  cases,  take  into  account  various  factors
affecting market value,  including  yields and prices of comparable  securities,
indication  as to value from  dealers and  general  market  conditions.  If such
prices are not supplied by the Portfolio's  independent  pricing  service,  such
securities are priced in accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees. All
portfolio  securities with a remaining  maturity of less than 60 days are valued
by the amortized cost method. Securities listed on a foreign exchange are valued
at the last  quoted  sale  price  available  before the time when net assets are
valued. Because of the large number of municipal bond issues outstanding and the
varying  maturity  dates,  coupons and risk factors  applicable to each issuer's
books,  no  readily   available  market  quotations  exist  for  most  municipal
securities.


         If the Portfolio determines that it would be detrimental to


<PAGE>


                                      B-47


the best  interest of the  remaining  investors in the Portfolio to make payment
wholly or partly in cash,  payment of the redemption  price may be made in whole
or in part by a distribution in kind of securities  from the Portfolio,  in lieu
of cash, in  conformity  with the  applicable  rule of the SEC. If interests are
redeemed  in kind,  the  redeeming  investor  might incur  transaction  costs in
converting the assets into cash. The method of valuing  portfolio  securities is
described  above  and  such  valuation  will  be made as of the  same  time  the
redemption price is determined. The Portfolio has elected to be governed by Rule
18f-1 under the 1940 Act pursuant to which the  Portfolio is obligated to redeem
interests  solely in cash up to the  lesser of  $250,000  or 1% of the net asset
value of the  Portfolio  during  any 90 day  period  for any one  investor.  The
Portfolio will not redeem in kind except in  circumstances  in which an investor
is permitted to redeem in kind.

ITEM 20.  TAX STATUS.

         The  Portfolio is organized as a New York trust.  The  Portfolio is not
subject  to any  income  or  franchise  tax  in the  State  of New  York  or the
Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts.  However each investor in the Portfolio will be
taxable on its share (as determined in accordance with the governing instruments
of the  Portfolio)  of the  Portfolio's  ordinary  income  and  capital  gain in
determining its income tax liability.  The  determination  of such share will be
made in accordance with the Code, and regulations promulgated thereunder.

         Although,  as described  above,  the  Portfolio  will not be subject to
federal income tax, it will file appropriate income tax returns.

         It is intended  that the  Portfolio's  assets will be managed in such a
way that an investor in the Portfolio  will be able to satisfy the  requirements
of Subchapter M of the Code.

         The Portfolio intends to qualify to allocate tax exempt interest to its
investors by having,  at the close of each quarter of its taxable year, at least
50% of the value of its total  assets  consist  of tax  exempt  securities.  Tax
exempt interest is that part of income earned by the Portfolio which consists of
interest  received by the  Portfolio  on tax exempt  securities.  In view of the
Portfolio's  investment  policies,  it is expected that a substantial portion of
all income will be tax exempt  income,  although the  Portfolio may from time to
time realize net  short-term  capital  gains and may invest  limited  amounts in
taxable securities under certain circumstances.


         Gains or losses on sales of  portfolio  securities  will be  treated as
long-term capital gains or losses if the securities have been held for more than
one year except in certain cases where,  if  applicable,  a put is acquired or a
call option is written thereon.



<PAGE>


                                      B-48


Other gains or losses on the sale of securities will be short-term capital gains
or losses.  Gains and losses on the sale, lapse or other  termination of options
on securities  will be treated as gains and losses from the sale of  securities.
If an option written by the Portfolio lapses or is terminated  through a closing
transaction,  such as a  repurchase  by the  Portfolio  of the  option  from its
holder, the Portfolio will realize a short-term capital gain or loss,  depending
on whether  the  premium  income is greater or less than the amount  paid by the
Portfolio  in the  closing  transaction.  If  securities  are  purchased  by the
Portfolio  pursuant to the exercise of a put option written by it, the Portfolio
will  subtract  the  premium  received  from  its cost  basis in the  securities
purchased.

         Forward currency contracts,  options and futures contracts entered into
by the Portfolio may create "straddles" for U.S. federal income tax purposes and
this may affect the  character  and  timing of gains or losses  realized  by the
Portfolio on forward currency contracts, options and futures contracts or on the
underlying  securities.  Straddles  may also  result in the loss of the  holding
period of  underlying  securities  for  purposes of the 30% of gross income test
described  above, and therefore,  the Portfolio's  ability to enter into forward
currency contracts, options and futures contracts may be limited.

         Certain  options,  futures and  foreign  currency  contracts  held by a
Portfolio  at the end of each  fiscal  year will be  required  to be  "marked to
market" for federal  income tax  purposes--i.e.,  treated as having been sold at
market  value.  For  options  and  futures  contracts,  60% of any  gain or loss
recognized on these deemed sales and on actual  dispositions  will be treated as
long-term  capital gain or loss, and the remainder will be treated as short-term
capital gain or loss  regardless of how long the Portfolio has held such options
or futures.  Any gain or loss recognized on foreign  currency  contracts will be
treated as ordinary income.

         FOREIGN  INVESTORS.  Allocations of U.S.  source  dividend income to an
investor who, as to the United States, is a foreign trust,  foreign  corporation
or other foreign  investor will be subject to United States  withholding  tax at
the rate of 30% (or lower treaty  rate).  Allocations  of Portfolio  interest or
short  term or net long term  capital  gains to  foreign  investors  will not be
subject to United States tax.

         STATE AND LOCAL TAXES.  The  Portfolio may be subject to state or local
taxes in jurisdictions in which the Portfolio is deemed to be doing business. In
addition, the treatment of the Portfolio and its investors in those states which
have income tax laws might differ from  treatment  under the federal  income tax
laws.  Investors should consult their own tax advisors with respect to any state
or local taxes.

         FOREIGN TAXES.  The Portfolio may be subject to foreign


<PAGE>


                                      B-49


withholding  taxes with respect to income  received from sources  within foreign
countries.

         OTHER TAXATION. The investment by an investor in the Portfolio does not
cause the investor to be liable for any income or franchise  tax in the State of
New York.  Investors  are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect
to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in the Portfolio.

ITEM 21.  UNDERWRITERS.


         The exclusive placement agent for the Portfolio is SBDS, which receives
no  additional  compensation  for  serving in this  capacity.  Other  investment
companies,  insurance  company  separate  accounts,  common and commingled trust
funds and similar  organizations  and  entities may  continuously  invest in the
Portfolio.


ITEM 22.  CALCULATIONS OF PERFORMANCE DATA.

         Not applicable.

ITEM 23.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.



         The Portfolio's current report to investors filed with the SEC pursuant
to  Section  30(b)  of the  1940  Act  and  Rule  30b2-1  thereunder  is  hereby
incorporated  herein  by  reference.  A copy of such  report  will be  provided,
without charge, to each person receiving this Part B.




<PAGE>


                                      B-50


                                   APPENDIX A

                        DESCRIPTION OF SECURITY RATINGS

STANDARD & POOR'S

CORPORATE AND MUNICIPAL BONDS

    AAA -      Debt rated AAA have the highest ratings  assigned by Standard &
               Poor's to a debt  obligation.  Capacity to pay interest and repay
               principal is extremely strong.

     AA -      Debt rated AA have a very strong  capacity to pay  interest and
               repay  principal and differ from the highest rated issues only in
               a small degree.

      A -      Debt rated A have a strong  capacity to pay  interest and repay
               principal although they are somewhat more


<PAGE>


                                      B-51


               susceptible  to the adverse  effects of changes in  circumstances
               and economic conditions than debts in higher rated categories.

    BBB -      Debt rated BBB are  regarded as having an adequate  capacity to
               pay interest and repay  principal.  Whereas they normally exhibit
               adequate  protection  parameters,  adverse economic conditions or
               changing  circumstances  are more  likely  to lead to a  weakened
               capacity to pay  interest and repay  principal  for debts in this
               category than for debts in higher rated categories.

     BB -      Debt  rated  BB  is   regarded   as  having   less   near-term
               vulnerability to default than other speculative issues.  However,
               it faces  major  ongoing  uncertainties  or  exposure  to adverse
               business,  financial or economic  conditions  which could lead to
               inadequate   capacity  to  meet  timely  interest  and  principal
               payments.

COMMERCIAL PAPER, INCLUDING TAX EXEMPT

      A -      Issues  assigned this highest rating are regarded as having the
               greatest capacity for timely payment. Issues in this category are
               further refined with the designations 1, 2, and 3 to indicate the
               relative degree of safety.

    A-1 -      This designation  indicates that the degree of safety regarding
               timely payment is very strong.

SHORT-TERM TAX-EXEMPT NOTES

   SP-1 -      The short-term  tax-exempt  note rating of SP-1 is the highest
               rating  assigned  by  Standard & Poor's and has a very  strong or
               strong  capacity to pay  principal  and  interest.  Those  issues
               determined to possess  overwhelming  safety  characteristics  are
               given a "plus" (+) designation.

   SP-2 -      The   short-term   tax-exempt   note  rating  of  SP-2  has  a
               satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest.

MOODY'S

CORPORATE AND MUNICIPAL BONDS

    Aaa  -     Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality.
               They  carry  the  smallest  degree  of  investment  risk  and are
               generally  referred  to as "gilt  edge".  Interest  payments  are
               protected  by a large or by an  exceptionally  stable  margin and
               principal is secure.  While the various  protective  elements are
               likely to  change,  such  changes as can be  visualized  are most
               unlikely  to impair the  fundamentally  strong  position  of such
               issues.


<PAGE>


                                      B-52


              

    Aa -       Bonds  which are rated Aa are  judged to be of high  quality by
               all standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are
               generally  known as high grade  bonds.  They are rated lower than
               the best bonds because  margins of protection may not be as large
               as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be
               of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which
               make the long  term  risks  appear  somewhat  larger  than in Aaa
               securities.

      A -      Bonds  which  are  rated A possess  many  favorable  investment
               attributes  and  are  to be  considered  as  upper  medium  grade
               obligations.  Factors  giving  security to principal and interest
               are considered adequate but elements may be present which suggest
               a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future.

    Baa -      Bonds  which  are  rated Baa are  considered  as  medium  grade
               obligations,  i.e., they are neither highly  protected nor poorly
               secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate
               for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or
               may be  characteristically  unreliable  over any great  length of
               time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment  characteristics and
               in fact have speculative characteristics as well.

    Ba -       Bonds  which  are  rated  Ba are  judged  to  have  speculative
               elements;  their future  cannot be  considered  as  well-assured.
               Often the  protection of interest and  principal  payments may be
               very moderate,  and thereby not well safeguarded during both good
               and  bad  times  over  the   future.   Uncertainty   of  position
               characterizes bonds in this class.

COMMERCIAL PAPER, INCLUDING TAX EXEMPT

Prime-1           - Issuers rated Prime-1 (or related  supporting  institutions)
                  have  a  superior   capacity  for   repayment  of   short-term
                  promissory   obligations.   Prime-1  repayment  capacity  will
                  normally be evidenced by the following characteristics:

               -  Leading market positions in well established industries.
               -  High rates of return on funds employed.
               -  Conservative capitalization structures with moderate
                  reliance on debt and ample asset protection.
               -  Broad margins in earnings coverage of fixed financial
                  charges and high internal cash generation.
               -  Well established access to a range of financial markets
                  and assured sources of alternate liquidity.


<PAGE>


                                      B-53



SHORT-TERM TAX EXEMPT NOTES

  MIG-1        - The  short-term  tax-exempt  note  rating  MIG-1 is the highest
               rating  assigned  by  Moody's  for  notes  judged  to be the best
               quality.  Notes with this rating  enjoy  strong  protection  from
               established  cash  flows of funds  for  their  servicing  or from
               established and broad-based access to the market for refinancing,
               or both.

  MIG-2        - MIG-2  rated  notes are of high  quality  but with  margins  of
               protection not as large as MIG-1.



<PAGE>
JPM437

                                     PART C

ITEM 24.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

         (A)      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                  The financial  statements  included in Part B, Item 23 of this
                  Registration Statement are as follows:


                  Schedule of  Investments as March 31, 1995 
                  Statement of Assets and  Liabilities at March 31, 1995
                  Statement of Operations for the period ended March 31, 1995
                  Statement of Changes in Net Assets 
                  Supplementary Data 
                  Notes to Financial Statements at March 31, 1995

         (B)      EXHIBITS 

                   1       Declaration of Trust of the Registrant.1

                   2       By-Laws of the Registrant.1

                   5       Investment  Advisory Agreement between the Registrant
                           and  Morgan   Guaranty  Trust  Company  of  New  York
                           ("Morgan Guaranty").1 

                   8       Custodian  Contract  between the Registrant and State
                           Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street").2

                   9(a)    Administration  Agreement  between the Registrant and
                           Signature Broker-Dealer Services, Inc.2

                   9(b)    Transfer Agency and Service Agreement between the



<PAGE>
                                      C-2

                           Registrant and State  Street.1

                   9(c)    Restated  Financial  and  Fund  Accounting   Services
                           Agreement   between   the   Registrant   and   Morgan
                           Guaranty.1

                   9(d)    Fund Services  Agreement  between the  Registrant and
                           Pierpont Group, Inc.2

                   13      Investment    representation   letters   of   initial
                           investors.2

                  1 Incorporated herein by reference from Amendment no. 1 to the
                  Registrant's  registration  statement  on Form N-1A  (File no.
                  811-8462) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
                  on July 31, 1995.

                  2  Incorporated  herein  by  reference  from the  Registrant's
                  registration  statement on Form N-1A (File no.  811-8462) (the
                  "Registration   Statement")   as  filed   initially  with  the
                  Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 1994.
                  
ITEM 25. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL WITH REGISTRANT.

                  Not applicable.

ITEM 26.  NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF SECURITIES.

         TITLE OF CLASS:  Beneficial Interests
         NUMBER OF RECORD HOLDERS :  2 (as of July 25, 1995)

ITEM 27.  INDEMNIFICATION.

         Reference is hereby made to Article V of the  Registrant's  Declaration
of Trust, filed as an Exhibit herewith.

         The Trustees and officers of the  Registrant  and the  personnel of the
Registrant's  administrator are insured under an errors and omissions  liability
insurance  policy.  The  Registrant  and its officers are also insured under the
fidelity bond required by Rule 17g-1 under the  Investment  Company Act of 1940,
as amended.

ITEM 28.  BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISER.

         Morgan  Guaranty is a New York trust  company  which is a  wholly-owned
subsidiary of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated. Morgan Guaranty conducts a general
banking and trust business.

         To the knowledge of the Registrant, none of the directors, except those
set forth below, or executive  officers of Morgan Guaranty is or has been during
the past two fiscal years engaged in any other business, profession, vocation or
employment of a substantial  nature,  except that certain officers and directors
of Morgan Guaranty also hold various positions with, and engage in business for,
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, which owns all the

<PAGE>

                                      C-3

outstanding stock of Morgan Guaranty. Set forth below are the names,  addresses,
and  principal  business of each  director of Morgan  Guaranty who is engaged in
another business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature.

         Martin  Feldstein:  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  National
Bureau of Economic Research,  Inc.;  Professor of Economics,  Harvard University
Research Institution (Academic  Institution).  His address is 1050 Massachusetts
Ave, Cambridge, MA 02138.

         Howard  Goldfeder:   Retired  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,
Federated Department Stores Inc. (Retailing).  His address is 7 West 7th Street,
Cincinnati, OH 45202.

         Hanna  H.  Gray:   President,   The  University  of  Chicago  (Academic
Institution). Her address is 5801 Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.

         James R.  Houghton:  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Corning
Incorporated (Glass products). His address is Corning, NY 14831.


         James L.  Ketelsen:  Retired  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,
Tenneco  Inc. ( Oil,  pipe-lines,  and  manufacturing).  His  address is Tenneco
Building, P.O. Box 2511, Houston, TX 77001.

         William S. Lee: Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer,  Duke
Power Company (Utility).  His address is 422 South Church Street,  Charlotte, NC
28242.

         Lee R.  Raymond:  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer,
Exxon Corporation (Oil, natural gas, and other petroleum products).  His address
is 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020.

<PAGE>


                                      C-4

          
         Richard   D.   Simmons:   President,   International   Herald   Tribune
(Newspaper). His address is 1150 Fifteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20071.

         John G. Smale:  Chairman of the Board General  Motors  Corporation  and
Retired  Chairman  of the Board and  Executive  Officer,  The Proctor and Gamble
Company  (Automobiles;  Household  Products).  His  address  is  P.O.  Box  599,
Cincinnati, OH 54201.

         Douglas C. Yearley:  Chairman,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,
Phelps Dodge  Corporation  (Chemicals).  His address is 2600 N. Central  Avenue,
Phoenix, AZ 85007. 

ITEM 29.  PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITERS.

         Not applicable.

ITEM 30.  LOCATION OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS.

         The accounts and records of the Registrant are located,  in whole or in
part, at the office of the Registrant and the following locations:

         Pierpont  Group,  Inc.,  461 Fifth  Avenue , New York,  New York 10017.
(records  relating to its assisting the Trustees in carrying out their duties in
supervising the Trust's affairs).

         Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New YorK, 60 Wall Street, New York, NY
10260-0060 or 9 West 57th Street,  New York, NY 10019.  (records relating to its
functions as investment adviser and services agent).

         State  Street Bank and Trust  Company,  40 King Street  West,  Toronto,
Ontario , Canada M5H 3Y8.  (records  relating to its  functions as custodian and
transfer agent).

         Signature Broker-Dealer Services,  Inc., 6 St. James Avenue, Boston, MA
02116.  (records  relating  to its  functions  as  administrator  and  exclusive
placement agent) 


ITEM 31.  MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

         Not applicable.


ITEM 32.  UNDERTAKINGS.

         Not applicable.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



          Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form N-1A
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized, in the
City of Boston and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 2nd day of August,
1995.


THE NEW YORK TOTAL RETURN BOND PORTFOLIO



By  /s/THOMAS M. LENZ
    ________________________________
    Thomas M. Lenz
    Assistant Secretary


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission