As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 1996
File No. 811-8462
==============================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM N-1A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
AMENDMENT NO. 3
THE NEW YORK TOTAL RETURN BOND PORTFOLIO
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
60 State Street, Suite 1300, Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
(617) 557-0700
John E. Pelletier, 60 State Street, Suite 1300, Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copy to: Steven K. West, Esq.
Sullivan & Cromwell
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
JPM613
<PAGE>
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Registration Statement has been filed by the Registrant pursuant
to Section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. However,
beneficial interests in the Registrant are not being registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") because such interests will be issued
solely in private placement transactions that do not involve any "public
offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. Investments in the
Registrant may only be made by other investment companies, insurance company
separate accounts, common or commingled trust funds or similar organizations or
entities that are "accredited investors" within the meaning of Regulation D
under the 1933 Act. This Registration Statement does not constitute an offer to
sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any beneficial interests in the
Registrant.
<PAGE>
PART A
Responses to Items 1 through 3 and 5A have been omitted pursuant to
paragraph 4 of Instruction F of the General Instructions to Form N-1A.
ITEM 4. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT.
The New York Total Return Bond Portfolio (the "Portfolio") is a
no-load non-diversified open-end management investment company which was
organized as a trust under the laws of the State of New York on June 16, 1993.
Beneficial interests in the Portfolio are issued solely in private placement
transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act").
Investments in the Portfolio may only be made by other investment companies,
insurance company separate accounts, common or commingled trust funds or similar
organizations or entities that are "accredited investors" within the meaning of
Regulation D under the 1933 Act. This Registration Statement does not constitute
an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any "security" within
the meaning of the 1933 Act.
Investments in the Portfolio are not deposits or obligations of, or
guaranteed or endorsed by, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York ("Morgan"
or the "Advisor") or any other bank. Interests in the Portfolio are not
federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal
Reserve Board or any other governmental agency. An investment in the Portfolio
is subject to risk, as the net asset value of the Portfolio will fluctuate with
changes in the value of the Portfolio's holdings. There can be no assurance that
the investment objective of the Portfolio will be achieved.
The Portfolio is advised by Morgan.
Part B contains more detailed information about the Portfolio,
including information related to (i) the investment policies and restrictions of
the Portfolio, (ii) the Trustees, officers, Advisor and administrators of the
Portfolio, (iii) portfolio transactions, (iv) rights and liabilities of
investors and (v) the audited financial statements of the Portfolio at March 31,
1996.
The investment objective of the Portfolio is described below, together
with the policies employed to attempt to achieve this objective. Additional
information about the investment policies of the Portfolio appears in Part B,
under Item 13.
The Portfolio's investment objective is to provide a high
<PAGE>
A-2
after tax total return for New York residents consistent with moderate risk of
capital. Total return will consist of income plus capital gains and losses. The
Portfolio is designed for investors who seek a high after tax total return and
who are willing to receive some taxable income and capital gains to achieve that
return.
The Portfolio's primary investments are municipal securities issued by
New York State and its political subdivisions and by agencies, authorities and
instrumentalities of New York and its political subdivisions. These securities
earn income exempt from federal and New York State and local income taxes but,
in certain circumstances, may be subject to alternative minimum tax. In
addition, the Portfolio may invest in municipal securities issued by states
other than New York, by territories and possessions of the United States and
their political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities. These securities
earn income exempt from federal income taxes but subject to New York State and
local income taxes. In order to seek to enhance the Portfolio's after tax
return, the Advisor may also invest in securities which earn income subject to
New York and/or federal income taxes. These securities include U.S. government
securities, corporate securities and municipal securities issued on a taxable
basis. For more information regarding tax matters, see Item 20 in Part B. Since
the Portfolio limits its purchases to investment grade securities, it may not
obtain the higher current income available from lower rated securities. See
"Quality Information" below.
The Advisor actively manages the Portfolio's duration, the allocation
of securities across market sectors and the selection of securities to seek to
achieve a high after tax total return. Based on fundamental economic and capital
markets research, the Advisor adjusts the duration of the Portfolio in light of
the Advisor's interest rate outlook. For example, if interest rates are expected
to rise, the duration may be shortened to lessen the Portfolio's exposure to the
expected decrease in bond prices. If interest rates are expected to remain
stable, the Advisor may lengthen the duration in order to enhance the
Portfolio's yield.
Duration is a measure of the weighted average maturity of the bonds
held in the Portfolio and can be used as a measure of the sensitivity of the
Portfolio's market value to changes in interest rates. Generally, the longer the
duration of the Portfolio, the more sensitive its market value will be to
changes in interest rates. Under normal market conditions, the Advisor believes
the Portfolio will have a duration of three to seven years. The maturity of
individual securities in the Portfolio may vary widely, however.
The Advisor also attempts to enhance after tax total return by
allocating the Portfolio's assets among market sectors. Specific securities
which the Advisor believes are undervalued are selected for purchase within
sectors using advanced quantitative tools, analysis of credit risk, the
expertise of a dedicated trading desk and the judgment of fixed income portfolio
<PAGE>
A-3
managers and analysts.
In seeking to achieve the Portfolio's investment objective, the
Advisor attempts to consider the tax consequences to investors of all portfolio
transactions. The Advisor will sell and purchase securities to change the
Portfolio's duration, sector allocation or securities holdings only if it
believes that the expected benefit to the Portfolio will be greater than the
capital gains or income taxes investors would incur as a result of these sales
and purchases. The success of this strategy depends on the Advisor's ability to
forecast accurately changes in interest rates and assess the value of fixed
income securities.
The Advisor intends to manage the Portfolio actively in pursuit of its
investment objective. Portfolio transactions are undertaken principally to
accomplish the Portfolio's objective in relation to expected movements in the
general level of interest rates, but the Portfolio may engage in short-term
trading consistent with its objective. Portfolio transactions may incur taxable
long term or short term capital gains which will be distributed and taxable to
investors. In addition, to the extent the Portfolio engages in short-term
trading, it may incur increased transactions costs. See Item 20 in Part B.
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES. Under normal circumstances, the Portfolio will
invest at least 65% of its total assets in municipal securities issued by New
York State and its political subdivisions and their agencies, authorities and
instrumentalities. The Portfolio may also invest in debt obligations of
municipal issuers other than New York. The municipal securities in which the
Portfolio invests are primarily municipal bonds and municipal notes.
MUNICIPAL BONDS. The Portfolio may invest in bonds issued by or on
behalf of New York State, other states, territories and possessions of the
United States and their political subdivisions, agencies, authorities and
instrumentalities. These obligations may be general obligation bonds secured by
the issuer's pledge of its full faith, credit and taxing power for the payment
of principal and interest, or they may be revenue bonds payable from specific
revenue sources, but not generally backed by the issuer's taxing power.
MUNICIPAL NOTES. The Portfolio may also invest in municipal notes of
various types, including notes issued in anticipation of receipt of taxes, the
proceeds of the sale of bonds, other revenues or grant proceeds, as well as
municipal commercial paper and municipal demand obligations such as variable
rate demand notes and master demand obligations. The interest rate on
<PAGE>
A-4
variable rate demand notes is adjustable at periodic intervals as specified in
the notes. Master demand obligations permit the investment of fluctuating
amounts at periodically adjusted interest rates. They are governed by agreements
between the municipal issuer and Morgan acting as agent, for no additional fee,
in its capacity as Advisor to the Portfolio and as fiduciary for other clients.
Although master demand obligations are not marketable to third parties, the
Portfolio considers them to be liquid because they are payable on demand. There
is no specific percentage limitation on these investments. For more information
about municipal notes, see Item 13 in Part B.
NEW YORK MUNICIPAL SECURITIES. Because of the Portfolio's significant
investment in New York municipal securities, its performance will be affected by
the condition of New York's economy, as well as the fiscal condition of the
State, its agencies and municipalities. The New York State economy generally
remains weak, despite some signs of growth. Compounding this effect is the
presence of a persistent budget deficit and the significant claims placed on the
State's budget by education, social service, and infrastructure needs. In
addition, the New York City economy and fiscal condition have profound
influences upon the market for most New York debt obligations. The Advisor
currently views the New York economy and financial condition as fundamentally
stable. However, the possibility of a disruption to economic and financial
conditions which would adversely affect the creditworthiness and marketability
of New York municipal securities continues to exist. For a more detailed
discussion of the risks associated with investing in New York municipal
securities, see Item 13 in Part B.
NON-MUNICIPAL SECURITIES. The Portfolio may invest in non-municipal
securities including obligations of the U.S. government and its agencies and
instrumentalities, bank obligations, debt securities of corporate issuers,
asset-backed and mortgage-related securities and repurchase agreements. The
Portfolio will invest in non-municipal securities when, in the opinion of the
Advisor, these securities will enhance the after tax total return to investors'
who are subject to federal and New York State income taxes in the highest tax
bracket. Under normal circumstances, the Portfolio's holdings of non-municipal
securities and municipal securities of tax-exempt issuers outside New York State
will not exceed 35% of its total assets.
QUALITY INFORMATION. The Portfolio will not purchase a security unless
it is rated at least Baa or better by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
("Moody's") or BBB or better by Standard & Poor's Ratings Group ("Standard &
Poor's") or it is unrated and
<PAGE>
A-5
in the Advisor's opinion is of comparable quality. Securities rated Baa by
Moody's or BBB by Standard & Poor's are considered investment grade, but have
some speculative characteristics. These standards must be satisfied at the time
an investment is made. If the quality of the investment later declines, the
Portfolio may continue to hold the investment. See Item 13 in Part B for more
detailed information on these ratings.
NON-DIVERSIFICATION. The Portfolio is registered as a non-diversified
investment company which means that the Portfolio is not limited by the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), in the proportion
of its assets that may be invested in the obligations of a single issuer. Thus,
the Portfolio may invest a greater proportion of its assets in the securities of
a smaller number of issuers and, as a result, will be subject to greater risk
with respect to its portfolio securities. The Portfolio, however, will comply
with the diversification requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"), for qualification as a regulated investment
company. See "Investment Restrictions" below and Item 20 in Part B.
The Portfolio may also purchase municipal securities together with
puts, purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, enter into
repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, purchase synthetic variable rate
instruments, loan its securities, purchase certain privately placed securities
and enter into certain futures and options transactions. For a discussion of
these transactions, see below.
ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS
WHEN-ISSUED AND DELAYED DELIVERY SECURITIES. The Portfolio may purchase
securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis. Delivery of and payment
for these securities may take as long as a month or more after the date of the
purchase commitment. The value of these securities is subject to market
fluctuation during this period and no interest or income accrues to the
Portfolio until settlement. At the time of settlement a when-issued security may
be valued at less than its purchase price. The Portfolio maintains with the
Custodian a separate account with a segregated portfolio of securities in an
amount at least equal to these commitments. When entering into a when-issued or
delayed delivery transaction, the Portfolio will rely on the other party to
consummate the transaction; if the other party fails to do so, the Portfolio may
be disadvantaged. It is the current policy of the Portfolio not to enter into
when-issued commitments exceeding in the aggregate 15% of the market value of
the Portfolio's total assets less liabilities other than the obligations created
by these commitments.
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. The Portfolio may engage in repurchase agreement
transactions with brokers, dealers or banks
<PAGE>
A-6
that meet the credit guidelines established by the Trustees. In a repurchase
agreement, the Portfolio buys a security from a seller that has agreed to
repurchase it at a mutually agreed upon date and price, reflecting the interest
rate effective for the term of the agreement. The term of these agreements is
usually from overnight to one week. A repurchase agreement may be viewed as a
fully collateralized loan of money by the Portfolio to the seller. The Portfolio
always receives securities as collateral with a market value at least equal to
the purchase price plus accrued interest and this value is maintained during the
term of the agreement. If the seller defaults and the collateral value declines,
the Portfolio might incur a loss. If bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with
respect to the seller, the Portfolio's realization upon the disposition of
collateral may be delayed or limited. Investments in certain repurchase
agreements and certain other investments which may be considered illiquid are
limited. See "Illiquid Investments; Privately Placed and other Unregistered
Securities" below.
LOANS OF PORTFOLIO SECURITIES. Subject to applicable investment
restrictions, the Portfolio is permitted to lend its securities in an amount up
to 33 1/3% of the value of the Portfolio's net assets. The Portfolio may lend
its securities if such loans are secured continuously by cash or equivalent
collateral or by a letter of credit in favor of the Portfolio at least equal at
all times to 100% of the market value of the securities loaned, plus accrued
interest. While such securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Portfolio
any income accruing thereon. Loans will be subject to termination by the
Portfolio in the normal settlement time, generally three business days after
notice, or by the borrower on one day's notice. Borrowed securities must be
returned when the loan is terminated. Any gain or loss in the market price of
the borrowed securities which occurs during the term of the loan inures to the
Portfolio and its respective investors. The Portfolio may pay reasonable
finders' and custodial fees in connection with a loan. In addition, the
Portfolio will consider all facts and circumstances including the
creditworthiness of the borrowing financial institution, and the Portfolio will
not make any loans in excess of one year. The Portfolio will not lend its
securities to any officer, Trustee, Director, employee or other affiliate of the
Portfolio, the Advisor or the exclusive placement agent, unless otherwise
permitted by applicable law.
REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. The Portfolio is permitted to enter
into reverse repurchase agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, the
Portfolio sells a security and agrees to repurchase it at a mutually agreed upon
date and price, reflecting the interest rate effective for the term of the
agreement. For the purposes of the 1940 Act, it is considered as a form of
borrowing by the Portfolio and, therefore, is a form of leverage. Leverage may
cause any gains or losses of the Portfolio to be
<PAGE>
A-7
magnified. For more information, see Item 13 in Part B.
PUTS. The Portfolio may purchase without limit municipal bonds or notes
together with the right to resell them at an agreed price or yield within a
specified period prior to maturity. This right to resell is known as a put. The
aggregate price paid for securities with puts may be higher than the price which
otherwise would be paid. The principal risk of puts is that the put writer may
default on its obligation to repurchase. The Advisor will monitor each writer's
ability to meet its obligations under puts. The amortized cost method is used by
the Portfolio to value all municipal securities with maturities of less than 60
days; when these securities are subject to puts separate from the underlying
securities, no value is assigned to the puts. The cost of any such put is
carried as an unrealized loss from the time of purchase until it is exercised or
expires. See Part B for the valuation procedure if the Portfolio were to invest
in municipal securities with maturities of 60 days or more that are subject to
separate puts.
SYNTHETIC VARIABLE RATE INSTRUMENTS. The Portfolio may invest in
certain synthetic variable rate instruments. Such instruments generally involve
the deposit of a long-term tax exempt bond in a custody or trust arrangement and
the creation of a mechanism to adjust the long-term interest rate on the bond to
a variable short-term rate and a right (subject to certain conditions) on the
part of the purchaser to tender it periodically to a third party at par. The
Advisor will review the structure of synthetic variable rate instruments to
identify credit and liquidity risks (including the conditions under which the
right to tender the instrument would no longer be available) and will monitor
those risks. In the event that the right to tender the instrument is no longer
available, the risk to the Portfolio will be that of holding the long-term bond.
ILLIQUID INVESTMENTS; PRIVATELY PLACED AND OTHER UNREGISTERED
SECURITIES. The Portfolio may not acquire any illiquid securities if, as a
result thereof, more than 15% of the market value of the Portfolio's net assets
would be in illiquid investments. Subject to this non-fundamental policy
limitation, the Portfolio may acquire investments that are illiquid or have
limited liquidity, such as private placements or investments that are not
registered under the 1933 Act and cannot be offered for public sale in the
United States without first being registered under the 1933 Act. An illiquid
investment is any investment that cannot be disposed of within seven days in the
normal course of business at approximately the amount at which it is valued by
the Portfolio. The price the Portfolio pays for illiquid securities or receives
upon resale may be lower than the price paid or received for similar securities
with a more liquid market. Accordingly the valuation of these securities will
reflect any limitations on their liquidity.
<PAGE>
A-8
The Portfolio may also purchase Rule 144A securities sold to
institutional investors without registration under the 1933 Act. These
securities may be determined to be liquid in accordance with guidelines
established by the Advisor and approved by the Trustees. The Trustees will
monitor the Advisor's implementation of these guidelines on a periodic basis.
FUTURES AND OPTIONS TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio is permitted to enter into the futures and options
transactions described below for both hedging and risk management purposes,
although not for speculation. For a more detailed description of these
transactions see "Futures and Options Transaction" in Item 13 in Part B.
The Portfolio may (a) purchase and sell exchange traded and
over-the-counter ("OTC") put and call options on fixed income securities and
indexes of fixed income securities, (b) purchase and sell futures contracts on
fixed income securities and indexes of fixed income securities and (c) purchase
and sell put and call options on futures contracts on fixed income securities
and indexes of fixed income securities.
The Portfolio may use futures contracts and options for hedging and
risk management purposes. The Portfolio may not use futures contracts and
options for speculation.
The Portfolio may utilize options and futures contracts to manage its
exposure to changing interest rates and/or security prices. Some options and
futures strategies, including selling futures contracts and buying puts, tend to
hedge the Portfolio's investments against price fluctuations. Other strategies,
including buying futures contracts, writing puts and calls, and buying calls,
tend to increase market exposure. Options and futures contracts may be combined
with each other or with forward contracts in order to adjust the risk and return
characteristics of the Portfolio's overall strategy in a manner deemed
appropriate to the Advisor and consistent with the Portfolio's objective and
policies. Because combined options positions involve multiple trades, they
result in higher transaction costs and may be more difficult to open and close
out.
The use of options and futures is a highly specialized activity which
involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with
ordinary portfolio securities transactions, and there can be no guarantee that
their use will increase the Portfolio's return. While the use of these
instruments by the Portfolio may reduce certain risks associated with owning its
portfolio securities, these techniques themselves entail certain other risks. If
the Advisor applies a strategy at an inappropriate time or judges market
conditions or trends incorrectly, options and futures strategies may lower the
Portfolio's return. Certain strategies limit the Portfolio's possibilities to
realize gains as well as limiting its exposure to losses. The Portfolio could
also experience losses if the
<PAGE>
A-9
prices of its options and futures positions were poorly correlated with its
other investments, or if it could not close out its positions because of an
illiquid secondary market. In addition, the Portfolio will incur transaction
costs, including trading commissions and option premiums, in connection with its
futures and options transactions and these transactions could significantly
increase the Portfolio's turnover rate.
The Portfolio may purchase and sell put and call options on securities
and indexes of securities, or futures contracts or options on futures contracts,
if such options are written by other persons and if (i) the aggregate premiums
paid on all such options which are held at any time to not exceed 20% of the
Portfolio's net assets, and (ii) the aggregate margin deposits required on all
such futures or options thereon held at any time to not exceed 5% of the
Portfolio's assets. In addition, the Portfolio will not purchase or sell (write)
futures contracts, options on futures contracts or commodity options for risk
management purposes if, as a result, the aggregate initial margin and options
premiums required to establish these positions exceed 5% of the net asset value
of the Portfolio.
OPTIONS
PURCHASING PUT AND CALL OPTIONS. By purchasing a put option, the
Portfolio obtains the right (but not the obligation) to sell the instrument
underlying the option at a fixed strike price. In return for this right, the
Portfolio pays the current market price for the option (known as the option
premium). Options have various types of underlying instruments, including
specific securities, indexes of securities, indexes of securities prices, and
futures contracts. The Portfolio may terminate its position in a put option it
has purchased by allowing it to expire or by exercising the option. The
Portfolio may also close out a put option position by entering into an
offsetting transaction, if a liquid market exists. If the option is allowed to
expire, the Portfolio will lose the entire premium it paid. If the Portfolio
exercises a put option on a security, it will sell the instrument underlying the
option at the strike price. If the Portfolio exercises an option on an index,
settlement is in cash and does not involve the actual sale of securities. An
option may be exercised on any day up to its expiration date.
The buyer of a typical put option can expect to realize a gain if the
price of the underlying instrument falls substantially. However, if the price of
the instrument underlying the option does not fall enough to offset the cost of
purchasing the option, a put buyer can expect to suffer a loss (limited to the
amount of the premium paid, plus related transaction costs).
The features of call options are essentially the same as
<PAGE>
A-10
those of put options, except that the purchaser of a call option obtains the
right to purchase, rather than sell, the instrument underlying the option at the
option's strike price. A call buyer typically attempts to participate in
potential price increases of the instrument underlying the option with risk
limited to the cost of the option if security prices fall. At the same time, the
buyer can expect to suffer a loss if security prices do not rise sufficiently to
offset the cost of the option.
SELLING (WRITING) PUT AND CALL OPTIONS. When the Portfolio writes a put
option, it takes the opposite side of the transaction from the option's
purchaser. In return for receipt of the premium, the Portfolio assumes the
obligation to pay the strike price for the instrument underlying the option if
the other party to the option chooses to exercise it. The Portfolio may seek to
terminate its position in a put option it writes before exercise by purchasing
an offsetting option in the market at its current price. If the market is not
liquid for a put option the Portfolio has written, however, the Portfolio must
continue to be prepared to pay the strike price while the option is outstanding,
regardless of price changes, and must continue to post margin as discussed
below.
If the price of the underlying instrument rises, a put writer would
generally expect to profit, although its gain would be limited to the amount of
the premium it received. If security prices remain the same over time, it is
likely that the writer will also profit, because it should be able to close out
the option at a lower price. If security prices fall, the put writer would
expect to suffer a loss. This loss should be less than the loss from purchasing
and holding the underlying instrument directly, however, because the premium
received for writing the option should offset a portion of the decline.
Writing a call option obligates the Portfolio to sell or deliver the
option's underlying instrument in return for the strike price upon exercise of
the option. The characteristics of writing call options are similar to those of
writing put options, except that writing calls generally is a profitable
strategy if prices remain the same or fall. Through receipt of the option
premium a call writer offsets part of the effect of a price decline. At the same
time, because a call writer must be prepared to deliver the underlying
instrument in return for the strike price, even if its current value is greater,
a call writer gives up some ability to participate in security price increases.
The writer of an exchange-traded put or call option on a security, an
index of securities or a futures contract is required to deposit cash or
securities or a letter of credit as margin and to make mark to market payments
of variation margin as the position becomes unprofitable.
OPTIONS ON INDEXES. The Portfolio may purchase and sell put and call
options and sell (write) covered put and call options on
<PAGE>
A-11
any securities index based on securities in which the Portfolio may invest.
Options on securities indexes are similar to options on securities, except that
the exercise of securities index options is settled by cash payment and does not
involve the actual purchase or sale of securities. In addition, these options
are designed to reflect price fluctuations in a group of securities or segment
of the securities market rather than price fluctuations in a single security.
The Portfolio, in purchasing or selling index options, is subject to the risk
that the value of its portfolio securities may not change as much as an index
because the Portfolio's investments generally will not match the composition of
an index.
For a number of reasons, a liquid market may not exist and thus the
Portfolio may not be able to close out an option position that it has previously
entered into. When the Portfolio purchases an OTC option, it will be relying on
its counterparty to perform its obligations, and the Portfolio may incur
additional losses if the counterparty is unable to perform.
FUTURES CONTRACTS
When the Portfolio purchases a futures contract, it agrees to purchase
a specified quantity of an underlying instrument at a specified future date or
to make a cash payment based on the value of a securities index. When the
Portfolio sells a futures contract, it agrees to sell a specified quantity of
the underlying instrument at a specified future date or to receive a cash
payment based on the value of a securities index. The price at which the
purchase and sale will take place is fixed when the Portfolio enters into the
contract. Futures can be held until their delivery dates or the position can be
(and normally is) closed out before then. There is no assurance, however, that a
liquid market will exist when the Portfolio wishes to close out a particular
position.
When the Portfolio purchases a futures contract, the value of the
futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of its
underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will tend to
increase the Portfolio's exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in
the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying instrument
directly. When the Portfolio sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of
its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the value of
the underlying instrument. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to
offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the
underlying instrument had been sold.
The purchaser or seller of a futures contract is not required to
deliver or pay for the underlying instrument unless the contract is held until
the delivery date. However, when the Portfolio buys or sells a futures contract
it will be required to deposit "initial margin" with the Custodian in a
segregated
<PAGE>
A-12
account in the name of its futures broker, known as a futures commission
merchant ("FCM"). Initial margin deposits are typically equal to a small
percentage of the contract's value. If the value of either party's position
declines, that party will be required to make additional "variation margin"
payments equal to the change in value on a daily basis. The party that has a
gain may be entitled to receive all or a portion of this amount. The Portfolio
may be obligated to make payments of variation margin at a time when it is
disadvantageous to do so. Furthermore, it may not always be possible for the
Portfolio to close out its futures positions. Until it closes out a futures
position, the Portfolio will be obligated to continue to pay variation margin.
Initial and variation margin payments do not constitute purchasing on margin for
purposes of the Portfolio's investment restrictions. In the event of the
bankruptcy of an FCM that holds margin on behalf of the Portfolio, the Portfolio
may be entitled to return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount
received by the FCM's other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the
Portfolio.
The Portfolio will segregate liquid assets in connection with its use
of options and futures contracts to the extent required by the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Securities held in a segregated account
cannot be sold while the futures contract or option is outstanding, unless they
are replaced with other suitable assets. As a result, there is a possibility
that segregation of a large percentage of the Portfolio's assets could impede
portfolio management or the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption requests or
other current obligations.
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
To allow investors in the Portfolio to qualify as regulated investment
companies under Subchapter M of the Code, the Portfolio limits its investments
so that at the close of each quarter of its taxable year (a) no more than 25% of
its total assets are invested in the securities of any one issuer, except
government securities, and (b) with regard to 50% of total assets, no more than
5% of total assets are invested in the securities of a single issuer, except
government securities.
The investment objective of the Portfolio, together with the
investment restrictions described below and in Part B, except as noted, are
deemed fundamental policies, i.e., they may be changed only with the approval of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Portfolio.
The Portfolio may not (i) borrow money, except that the Portfolio may
(a) borrow money from banks for temporary or
<PAGE>
A-13
emergency purposes (not for leveraging purposes) and (b) enter into reverse
repurchase agreements for any purpose; provided that (a) and (b) in total do not
exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the Portfolio's total assets (including the
amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). If at any time
borrowings come to exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the Portfolio's total assets,
the Portfolio will reduce its borrowings within three business days to the
extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation; or (ii) issue senior
securities except as permitted by the 1940 Act or any rule, order or
interpretation thereunder. See "Additional Investment Information and Risk
Factors -- Loans of Portfolio Securities" and "Additional Investment Information
and Risk Factors -- Reverse Repurchase Agreements."
For a more detailed discussion of the above investment restrictions, as
well as a description of certain other investment restrictions, see Item 13 in
Part B.
ITEM 5. MANAGEMENT OF THE PORTFOLIO.
The Board of Trustees provides broad supervision over the affairs of
the Portfolio. The Portfolio has retained the services of Morgan as investment
adviser and administrative services agent. The Portfolio has retained the
services of Funds Distributor, Inc. ("FDI") as co-administrator (the
"Co-Administrator").
The Portfolio has not retained the services of a principal underwriter
or distributor, since interests in the Portfolio are offered solely in private
placement transactions. FDI, acting as agent for the Portfolio, serves as
exclusive placement agent of interests in the Portfolio. FDI receives no
additional compensation for serving as exclusive placement agent to the
Portfolio.
The Portfolio has entered into a Portfolio Fund Services Agreement,
amended as of August 1, 1996, with Pierpont Group, Inc. to assist the Trustees
in exercising their overall supervisory responsibilities for the Portfolio's
affairs. The fees to be paid under this agreement approximate the reasonable
cost of Pierpont Group, Inc. in providing these services. Pierpont Group, Inc.
was organized in 1989 at the request of the Trustees of The Pierpont Funds
(currently an investor in the Portfolio) for the purpose of providing these
services at cost to The Pierpont Funds. See Item 14 in Part B. The principal
offices of Pierpont Group, Inc. are located at 461 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10017.
INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Morgan, with principal offices at 60 Wall
Street, New York, New York 10260, is a New York trust company which conducts a
general banking and trust business. Morgan is a wholly owned subsidiary
of J.P Morgan & Co. Incorporated ("J.P. Morgan"), a bank holding company
organized under the laws of Delaware. Through offices in New York City and
abroad, J.P. Morgan, through the Advisor and other subsidiaries, offers a wide
range of services to governmental, institutional,
<PAGE>
A-14
corporate and individual customers and acts as investment adviser to individual
and institutional clients with combined assets under management of over $179
billion (of which the Advisor advises over $28 billion). Morgan provides
investment advice and portfolio management services to the Portfolio. Subject to
the supervision of the Portfolio's Trustees, Morgan, as the Advisor, makes the
Portfolio's day-to-day investment decisions, arranges for the execution of
portfolio transactions and generally manages the Portfolio's investments.
See Item 16 in Part B.
The Advisor uses a sophisticated, disciplined, collaborative process
for managing all asset classes. For fixed income portfolios, this process
focuses on the systematic analysis of real interest rates, sector
diversification and quantitative and credit analysis. Morgan has managed
portfolios of domestic fixed income securities on behalf of its clients for over
50 years. The Portfolio managers making investments in domestic fixed income
securities work in conjunction with fixed income, credit, capital market and
economic research analysts, as well as traders and administrative officers.
The following persons are primarily responsible for the day-to-day
management and implementation of Morgan's process for the Portfolio (the
inception date of each person's responsibility for the Portfolio and his or her
business experience for the past five years are indicated parenthetically):
Elizabeth A. Augustin, Vice President (since April, 1994; employed by Morgan
since prior to 1991) and Gregory J. Harris, Vice President (since January, 1996,
employed by Morgan since prior to 1991).
As compensation for the services rendered and related expenses borne
by Morgan under the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Portfolio, the
Portfolio has agreed to pay Morgan a fee which is computed daily and may be paid
monthly at the annual rate of 0.30% of the Portfolio's average daily net assets.
Under separate agreements, Morgan also provides administrative and
related servies to the Portfolio. See "Administrative Services Agent" below.
Co-Administrator. Under a Co-Administration Agreement with the
Portfolio, FDI serves as the Co-Administrator for the Portfolio and in that
capacity FDI (i) provides office space, equipment and clerlical personnel for
maintaining the organization and books and records of the Portfolio; (ii)
provides officers for the Portfolio; (iii) files Portfolio regulatory documents
and mails Portfolio communications to Trustees and investors and (iv) maintains
related books and records. See "Administrative Services Agent" below.
<PAGE>
A-15
FDI, a registered broker-dealer, also serves as Exclusive Placement
Agent for the Portfolio. FDI is a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Boston
Institutional Group, Inc. FDI currently provides administration and distribution
services for a number of other registered investment companies.
Administrative Services Agent. Under Administrative Services
Agreements with the Portfolio, Morgan is repsonsible for certain administrative
and related services provided to the Portfolio, including services related to
taxes, financial statements, calculation of performance date, oversight of
service providers and certain regulatory and Board of Trustees matters. Under
the Administrative Services Agreement and the Co-Administration Agreement, the
Portfolio has agreed to pay Morgan and FDI fees equal to its allocable share of
an annual complex-wide charge. This charge is calculated daily based on the
aggregate net assets of the Portfolio and the other portfolios (collectively the
"Master Portfolios") in which series of the Trust, the Pierpont Funds or The JPM
Advisor Funds invest in accordance with the following annual schedule: 0.09% on
the first $7 billion of the Master Portfolios' aggregate average daily net
assets and 0.04% of the Master Portfolios' average daily net assets in excess of
$7 billion.
Custodian. State Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street"), 225
Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02101, serves as the Portfolio's
Custodian. State Street also keeps the books of account for the Portfolio.
Morgan has agreed that it will reimburse the Portfolio through at
least July 31, 1997 to the extent necessary to maintain the Portfolio's total
operating expenses at the annual rate of 0.50% of the Portfolio's average daily
net assets. This limit does not cover extraordinary expenses during the period.
There is no assurance that Morgan will continue this waiver beyond the specified
period, except as required by the following sentence. Morgan has agreed to waive
fees as necessary, if in any fiscal year the sum of the Portfolio's expenses
exceeds the limits set by applicable regulations of state securities
commissions. Such annual limits are currently 2.5% of the first $30 million of
average net assets, 2% of the next $70 million of such net assets and 1.5% of
such net assets in excess of $100 million for any fiscal year.
<PAGE>
A-16
ITEM 6. CAPITAL STOCK AND OTHER SECURITIES.
The Portfolio is organized as a trust under the laws of the State of
New York. Under the Declaration of Trust, the Trustees are authorized to issue
beneficial interests in the Portfolio. Each investor is entitled to a vote in
proportion to the amount of its investment in the Portfolio. Investments in the
Portfolio may not be transferred, but an investor may withdraw all or any
portion of its investment at any time at net asset value. Investors in the
Portfolio (e.g., other investment companies, insurance company separate accounts
and common and commingled trust funds) will each be liable for all obligations
of the Portfolio. However, the risk of an investor in the Portfolio incurring
financial loss on account of such liability is limited to circumstances in which
both inadequate insurance existed and the Portfolio itself was unable to meet
its obligations.
Investments in the Portfolio have no preemptive or conversion rights
and are fully paid and nonassessable, except as set forth below. The Portfolio
is not required and has no current intention of holding annual meetings of
investors, but the Portfolio will hold special meetings of investors when in the
judgment of the Trustees it is necessary or desirable to submit matters for an
investor vote. Changes in fundamental policies will be submitted to investors
for approval. Investors have under certain circumstances (e.g., upon application
and submission of certain specified documents to the Trustees by a specified
percentage of the outstanding interests in the Portfolio) the right to
communicate with other investors in connection with requesting a meeting of
investors for the purpose of removing one or more Trustees. Investors also have
the right to remove one or more Trustees without a meeting by a declaration in
writing by a specified percentage of the outstanding interests in the Portfolio.
Upon liquidation of the Portfolio, investors would be entitled to share pro rata
in the net assets of the Portfolio available for distribution to investors.
The net asset value of the Portfolio is determined each business day
other than the holidays listed in Part B ("Portfolio Business Day"). This
determination is made once each Portfolio Business Day as of 4:15 p.m. New York
time (the "Valuation Time").
The "net income" of the Portfolio will consist of (i) all income
accrued, less the amortization of any premium, on the assets of the Portfolio,
less (ii) all actual and accrued expenses of the Portfolio determined in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Interest income
includes discount earned (including both original issue and market discount) on
discount paper accrued ratably to the date of maturity and any net realized
gains or losses on the assets of the Portfolio. All the net income of the
Portfolio is allocated pro rata among the investors in the Portfolio.
The end of the Portfolio's fiscal year is March 31.
<PAGE>
A-17
Under the anticipated method of operation of the Portfolio, the
Portfolio will not be subject to any income tax. However, each investor in the
Portfolio will be taxable on its share (as determined in accordance with the
governing instruments of the Portfolio) of the Portfolio's ordinary income and
capital gain in determining its income tax liability. The determination of such
share will be made in accordance with the Code and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
It is intended that the Portfolio's assets, income and distributions
will be managed in such a way that an investor in the Portfolio will be able to
satisfy the requirements of Subchapter M of the Code, assuming that the investor
invested all of its assets in the Portfolio.
Investor inquiries may be directed to FDI at 60 State Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109 or by calling FDI at (617) 557-0700.
ITEM 7. PURCHASE OF SECURITIES.
Beneficial interests in the Portfolio are issued solely in private
placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the
meaning of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. Investments in the Portfolio may only
be made by other investment companies, insurance company separate accounts,
common or commingled trust funds, or similar organizations or entities
which are "accredited investors" as defined in Rule 501 under the 1933 Act. This
Registration Statement does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation
of an offer to buy, any "security" within the meaning of the 1933 Act.
An investment in the Portfolio may be made without a sales load. All
investments are made at net asset value next determined after an order is
received in "good order" by the Portfolio. The net asset value of the Portfolio
is determined on each Portfolio Business Day.
There is no minimum initial or subsequent investment in the Portfolio.
However, because the Portfolio intends to be as fully invested at all times as
is reasonably practicable in order to enhance the yield on its assets,
investments must be made in federal funds (i.e., monies credited to the account
of the Custodian by a Federal Reserve Bank).
The Portfolio and FDI reserve the right to cease accepting investments
at any time or to reject any investment order.
<PAGE>
A-18
Each investor in the Portfolio may add to or reduce its investment in
the Portfolio on each Portfolio Business Day. At the Valuation Time on each such
day, the value of each investor's beneficial interest in the Portfolio will be
determined by multiplying the net asset value of the Portfolio by the
percentage, effective for that day, which represents that investor's share of
the aggregate beneficial interests in the Portfolio. Any additions or
reductions, which are to be effected at the Valuation Time on such day, will
then be effected. The investor's percentage of the aggregate beneficial
interests in the Portfolio will then be recomputed as the percentage equal to
the fraction (i) the numerator of which is the value of such investor's
investment in the Portfolio to the Valuation Time on such day plus or minus,
as the case may be, the amount of net additions to or reductions in the
investor's investment in the Portfolio effected as of the Valuation Time, and
(ii) the denominator of which is the aggregate net asset value of the Portfolio
as of the Valuation Time on such day, plus or minus, as the case may be, the
amount of net additions to or reductions in
<PAGE>
A-19
the aggregate investments in the Portfolio by all investors in the Portfolio.
The percentage so determined will then be applied to determine the value of the
investor's interest in the Portfolio as of the Valuation Time on the following
Portfolio Business Day.
ITEM 8. REDEMPTION OR REPURCHASE.
An investor in the Portfolio may reduce all or any portion of its
investment at the net asset value next determined after a request in "good
order" is furnished by the investor to the Portfolio. The proceeds of a
reduction will be paid by the Portfolio in federal funds normally on the
next Portfolio Business Day after the reduction is effected, but in any event
within seven days. Investments in the Portfolio may not be transferred.
The right of any investor to receive payment with respect to any
reduction may be suspended or the payment of the proceeds therefrom postponed
during any period in which the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") is closed
(other than weekends or holidays) or trading on the NYSE is restricted or, to
the extent otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act, if an emergency exists.
The Portfolio reserves the right under certain circumstances, such as
accommodating requests for substantial withdrawals or liquidations, to pay
distributions in kind to investors (i.e., to distribute portfolio securities as
opposed to cash). If securities are distributed, an investor could incur
brokerage, tax or other charges in converting the securities to cash. In
addition, distribution in kind may result in a less diversified portfolio of
investments or adversely affect the liquidity of the Portfolio or the investor's
portfolio, as the case may be.
ITEM 9. PENDING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Not applicable.
<PAGE>
JPM613
PART B
ITEM 10. COVER PAGE.
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE
General Information and History . . . . . . . . . . . B-1
Investment Objectives and Policies . . . . . . . . . B-1
Management of the Portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-37
Control Persons and Principal Holder
of Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-43
Investment Advisory and Other Services . . . . . . . B-43
Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices . . . . . . B-48
Capital Stock and Other Securities . . . . . . . . . B-50
Purchase, Redemption and Pricing of
Securities Being Offered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-51
Tax Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-52
Underwriters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-54
Calculations of Performance Data . . . . . . . . . . B-54
Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-54
ITEM 12. GENERAL INFORMATION AND HISTORY.
Not applicable.
ITEM 13. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES.
The investment objective of The New York Total Return Bond Portfolio
(the "Portfolio") is to provide a high after tax total return consistent with
moderate risk of capital. Total return will consist of income plus capital gains
and losses. The Portfolio attempts to achieve its investment objective by
investing primarily in municipal securities issued by New York State and its
political subdivisions and by agencies, authorities and instrumentalities of New
York and its political subdivisions.
These securities earn income exempt from federal and New York State and
local income taxes but, in certain circumstances, may be subject to alternative
minimum tax. In addition, the Portfolio may invest in municipal securities
issued by states other than New York, by territories and possessions of the
United States and by the District of Columbia and their political subdivisions,
agencies and instrumentalities. These securities earn income exempt from federal
income taxes but, in certain circumstances, may be subject to alternative
minimum tax. The Portfolio is advised by Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New
York ("Morgan" or the "Advisor"). In order to seek to enhance the Portfolio's
after tax return, the Portfolio
<PAGE>
B-2
may also invest in securities which earn income subject to New York and/or
federal income taxes. These securities include U.S. government securities,
corporate securities and municipal securities issued on a taxable basis.
The following discussion supplements the information regarding the
investment objective of the Portfolio and the policies to be employed to achieve
this objective as set forth above and in Part A.
MONEY MARKET INSTRUMENTS
As discussed in Part A, the Portfolio may invest in money market
instruments to the extent consistent with its investment objective and policies.
A description of the various types of money market instruments that may be
purchased by the Portfolio appears below. See "Quality and Diversification
Requirements" below.
U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES. The Portfolio may invest in direct
obligations of the U.S. Treasury, including Treasury bills, notes and bonds, all
of which are backed as to principal and interest payments by the full faith and
credit of the United States.
ADDITIONAL U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS. The Portfolio may invest in
obligations issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or
instrumentalities. These obligations may or may not be backed by the "full faith
and credit" of the United States. In the case of securities not backed by the
full faith and credit of the United States, the Portfolio must look principally
to the federal agency issuing or guaranteeing the obligation for ultimate
repayment and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself
in the event the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitments.
Securities in which the Portfolio may invest that are not backed by the full
faith and credit of the United States include, but are not limited to,
obligations of the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal National Mortgage
Association, and the U.S. Postal Service, each of which has the right to borrow
from the U.S. Treasury to meet its obligations, and obligations of the Federal
Farm Credit System and the Federal Home Loan Banks, both of whose obligations
may be satisfied only by the individual credits of each issuing agency.
Securities which are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States
include obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association, the Farmers
Home Administration, and the Export-Import Bank.
BANK OBLIGATIONS. The Portfolio, unless otherwise noted in Part A or
below, may invest in negotiable certificates of deposit, time deposits and
bankers' acceptances of (i) banks, savings and loan associations and savings
banks which have more than $2 billion in total assets and are organized under
the laws of the United States or any state, (ii) foreign branches of these
<PAGE>
B-3
banks of equivalent size (Euros) and (iii) U.S. branches of foreign banks of
equivalent size (Yankees). The Portfolio may not invest in obligations of
foreign branches of foreign banks. The Portfolio will not invest in obligations
for which the Advisor, or any of its affiliated persons, is the ultimate obligor
or accepting bank.
COMMERCIAL PAPER. The Portfolio may invest in commercial paper,
including master demand obligations. Master demand obligations are obligations
that provide for a periodic adjustment in the interest rate paid and permit
daily changes in the amount borrowed. Master demand obligations are governed by
agreements between the issuer and Morgan acting as agent, for no additional fee,
in its capacity as investment advisor to the Portfolios and as fiduciary for
other clients for whom it exercises investment discretion. The monies loaned to
the borrower come from accounts managed by the Advisor or its affiliates,
pursuant to arrangements with such accounts. Interest and principal payments are
credited to such accounts. The Advisor, acting as a fiduciary on behalf of its
clients, has the right to increase or decrease the amount provided to the
borrower under an obligation. The borrower has the right to pay without penalty
all or any part of the principal amount then outstanding on an obligation
together with interest to the date of payment. Since these obligations typically
provide that the interest rate is tied to the Treasury Bill auction rate, the
rate on master demand obligations is subject to change. Repayment of a master
demand obligation to participating accounts depends on the ability of the
borrower to pay the accrued interest and principal of the obligation on demand
which is continuously monitored by the Portfolios' Advisor. Since master demand
obligations typically are not rated by credit rating agencies, the Portfolio may
invest in such unrated obligations only if at the time of an investment the
obligation is determined by the Advisor to have a credit quality which satisfies
the Portfolio's quality restrictions. See "Quality and Diversification
Requirements" below. Although there is no secondary market for master demand
obligations, such obligations are considered by the Portfolio to be liquid
because they are payable upon demand. The Portfolio does not have any specific
percentage limitation on investments in master demand obligations.
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. The Portfolio may enter into repurchase
agreements with brokers, dealers or banks that meet the credit guidelines
approved by the Trustees. In a repurchase agreement, the Portfolio buys a
security from a seller that has agreed to repurchase the same security at a
mutually agreed upon date and price. The resale price normally is in excess of
the purchase price, reflecting an agreed upon interest rate. This interest rate
is effective for the period of time the Portfolio is invested in the agreement
and is not related to the coupon rate on the underlying security. A repurchase
agreement may also be viewed as a fully collateralized loan of money by the
Portfolio to the seller. The period of these repurchase
<PAGE>
B-4
agreements will usually be short, from overnight to one week, and at no time
will the Portfolio invest in repurchase agreements for more than 13 months. The
securities which are subject to repurchase agreements, however, may have
maturity dates in excess of 13 months from the effective date of the repurchase
agreement.
The Portfolio will always receive securities as collateral whose market
value is, and during the entire term of the agreement remains, at least equal to
100% of the dollar amount invested by the Portfolio in each agreement plus
accrued interest, and the Portfolio will make payment for such securities only
upon physical delivery or upon evidence of book entry transfer to the account of
the Portfolio's custodian (the "Custodian").
If the seller defaults, the Portfolio might incur a loss if the value
of the collateral securing the repurchase agreement declines and might incur
disposition costs in connection with liquidating the collateral. In addition, if
bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with respect to the seller of the security,
realization upon the collateral by the Portfolio may be delayed or limited.
The Portfolio may make investments in other debt securities with
remaining effective maturities of not more than 13 months, including without
limitation corporate and foreign bonds, asset-backed securities and other
obligations described in Part A or this Part B. The Portfolio may not invest in
foreign bonds or asset-backed securities.
TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS
As discussed in Part A, the Portfolio may invest in tax exempt
obligations to the extent consistent with the Portfolio's investment objective
and policies. A description of the various types of tax exempt obligations which
may be purchased by the Portfolio appears in Part A and below. See "Quality and
Diversification Requirements" below.
MUNICIPAL BONDS. Municipal bonds are debt obligations issued by the
states, territories and possessions of the United States and the District of
Columbia, by their political subdivisions and by duly constituted authorities
and corporations. For example, states, territories, possessions and
municipalities may issue municipal bonds to raise funds for various public
purposes such as airports, housing, hospitals, mass transportation, schools,
water and sewer works. They may also issue municipal bonds to refund outstanding
obligations and to meet general operating expenses. Public authorities issue
municipal bonds to obtain funding for privately operated facilities, such as
housing and pollution control facilities, for industrial facilities or for water
supply, gas, electricity or waste disposal facilities.
Municipal bonds may be general obligation or revenue bonds. General
obligation bonds are secured by the issuer's pledge of its full faith, credit
and taxing power for the payment of
<PAGE>
B-5
principal and interest. Revenue bonds are payable from revenues derived from
particular facilities, from the proceeds of a special excise tax or from other
specific revenue sources. They are not generally payable from the general taxing
power of a municipality.
MUNICIPAL NOTES. Municipal notes are subdivided into three categories
of short-term obligations: municipal notes, municipal commercial paper and
municipal demand obligations.
Municipal notes are short-term obligations with a maturity at the time
of issuance ranging from six months to five years. The principal types of
municipal notes include tax anticipation notes, bond anticipation notes, revenue
anticipation notes, grant anticipation notes and project notes. Notes sold in
anticipation of collection of taxes, a bond sale, or receipt of other revenues
are usually general obligations of the issuing municipality or agency.
Municipal commercial paper typically consists of very short-term
unsecured negotiable promissory notes that are sold to meet seasonal working
capital or interim construction financing needs of a municipality or agency.
While these obligations are intended to be paid from general revenues or
refinanced with long-term debt, they frequently are backed by letters of credit,
lending agreements, note repurchase agreements or other credit facility
agreements offered by banks or institutions.
Municipal demand obligations are subdivided into two types: variable
rate demand notes and master demand obligations.
Variable rate demand notes are tax exempt municipal obligations or
participation interests that provide for a periodic adjustment in the interest
rate paid on the notes. They permit the holder to demand payment of the notes,
or to demand purchase of the notes at a purchase price equal to the unpaid
principal balance, plus accrued interest either directly by the issuer or by
drawing on a bank letter of credit or guaranty issued with respect to such note.
The issuer of the municipal obligation may have a corresponding right to prepay
at its discretion the outstanding principal of the note plus accrued interest
upon notice comparable to that required for the holder to demand payment. The
variable rate demand notes in which the Portfolio may invest are payable, or are
subject to purchase, on demand usually on notice of seven calendar days or less.
The terms of the notes provide that interest rates are adjustable at intervals
ranging from daily to six months, and the adjustments are based upon the prime
rate of a bank or other appropriate interest rate index specified in the
respective notes. Variable rate demand notes are valued at amortized cost; no
value is assigned to the right of the Portfolio to receive the par value of the
obligation upon demand or notice.
<PAGE>
B-6
Master demand obligations are tax exempt municipal obligations that
provide for a periodic adjustment in the interest rate paid and permit daily
changes in the amount borrowed. The interest on such obligations is, in the
opinion of counsel for the borrower, exempt from federal income tax. Although
there is no secondary market for master demand obligations, such obligations are
considered by the Portfolio to be liquid because they are payable upon demand.
The Portfolio has no specific percentage limitations on investments in master
demand obligations.
PUTS. The Portfolio may purchase without limit municipal bonds or notes
together with the right to resell the bonds or notes to the seller at an agreed
price or yield within a specified period prior to the maturity date of the bonds
or notes. Such a right to resell is commonly known as a "put." The aggregate
price for bonds or notes with puts may be higher than the price for bonds or
notes without puts. Consistent with the Portfolio's investment objective and
subject to the supervision of the Trustees, the purpose of this practice is to
permit the Portfolio to be fully invested in tax exempt securities while
preserving the necessary liquidity to purchase securities on a when-issued
basis, to meet unusually large redemptions, and to purchase at a later date
securities other than those subject to the put. The principal risk of puts is
that the writer of the put may default on its obligation to repurchase. The
Advisor will monitor each writer's ability to meet its obligations under puts.
Puts may be exercised prior to the expiration date in order to fund
obligations to purchase other securities or to meet redemption requests. These
obligations may arise during periods in which proceeds from sales of interests
in the Portfolio and from recent sales of portfolio securities are insufficient
to meet obligations or when the funds available are otherwise allocated for
investment. In addition, puts may be exercised prior to the expiration date in
order to take advantage of alternative investment opportunities or in the event
the Advisor revises its evaluation of the creditworthiness of the issuer of the
underlying security. In determining whether to exercise puts prior to their
expiration date and in selecting which puts to exercise, the Advisor considers
the amount of cash available to the Portfolio, the expiration dates of the
available puts, any future commitments for securities purchases, alternative
investment opportunities, the desirability of retaining the underlying
securities in the Portfolio and the yield, quality and maturity dates of the
underlying securities.
The Portfolio values any municipal bonds and notes subject to puts with
remaining maturities of less than 60 days by the amortized cost method. If the
Portfolio were to invest in municipal bonds and notes with maturities of 60 days
or more that are subject to puts separate from the underlying securities, the
puts and the underlying securities would be valued at fair value
<PAGE>
B-7
as determined in accordance with procedures established by the Board of
Trustees. The Board of Trustees would, in connection with the determination of
the value of a put, consider, among other factors, the creditworthiness of the
writer of the put, the duration of the put, the dates on which or the periods
during which the put may be exercised and the applicable rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Prior to investing in
such securities, the Portfolio, if deemed necessary based upon the advice of
counsel, will apply to the SEC for an exemptive order, which may not be granted,
relating to the valuation of such securities.
Since the value of the put is partly dependent on the ability of the
put writer to meet its obligation to repurchase, the Portfolio's policy is to
enter into put transactions only with municipal securities dealers who are
approved by the Portfolio's Advisor. Each dealer will be approved on its own
merits, and it is the Portfolio's general policy to enter into put transactions
only with those dealers which are determined to present minimal credit risks. In
connection with such determination, the Trustees will review regularly the
Advisor's list of approved dealers, taking into consideration, among other
things, the ratings, if available, of their equity and debt securities, their
reputation in the municipal securities markets, their net worth, their
efficiency in consummating transactions and any collateral arrangements, such as
letters of credit, securing the puts written by them. Commercial bank dealers
normally will be members of the Federal Reserve System, and other dealers will
be members of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or members of
a national securities exchange. Other put writers will have outstanding debt
rated Aa or better by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") or AA or
better by Standard & Poor's Ratings Group ("Standard & Poor's") or will be of
comparable quality in the Advisor's opinion or such put writers' obligations
will be collateralized and of comparable quality in the Advisor's opinion. The
Trustees have directed the Advisor not to enter into put transactions with any
dealer which in the judgment of the Advisor becomes more than a minimal credit
risk. In the event that a dealer should default on its obligation to repurchase
an underlying security, the Portfolio is unable to predict whether all or any
portion of any loss sustained could subsequently be recovered from such dealer.
The Portfolio has been advised by counsel that it will be considered
the owner of the securities subject to the puts so that the interest on the
securities is tax exempt income to the Portfolio. Such advice of counsel is
based on certain assumptions concerning the terms of the puts and the attendant
circumstances.
FOREIGN INVESTMENTS
To the extent that the Portfolio invests in municipal bonds and notes
backed by credit support arrangements with foreign
<PAGE>
B-8
financial institutions, the risks associated with investing in foreign
securities may be relevant to the Portfolio.
ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS
WHEN-ISSUED AND DELAYED DELIVERY SECURITIES. The Portfolio may purchase
securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis. For example, delivery of
and payment for these securities can take place a month or more after the date
of the purchase commitment. The purchase price and the interest rate payable, if
any, on the securities are fixed on the purchase commitment date or at the time
the settlement date is fixed. The value of such securities is subject to market
fluctuation and no interest accrues to the Portfolio until settlement takes
place. At the time the Portfolio makes the commitment to purchase securities on
a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, it will record the transaction, reflect
the value each day of such securities in determining its net asset value and, if
applicable, calculate the maturity for the purposes of average maturity from
that date. At the time of settlement a when-issued security may be valued at
less than the purchase price. To facilitate such acquisitions, the Portfolio
will maintain with the Custodian a segregated account with liquid assets,
consisting of cash, U.S. Government securities or other appropriate securities,
in an amount at least equal to such commitments. On delivery dates for such
transactions, the Portfolio will meet its obligations from maturities or sales
of the securities held in the segregated account and/or from cash flow. If the
Portfolio chooses to dispose of the right to acquire a when-issued security
prior to its acquisition, it could, as with the disposition of any other
portfolio obligation, incur a gain or loss due to market fluctuation. It is the
current policy of the Portfolio not to enter into when-issued commitments
exceeding in the aggregate 15% of the market value of the Portfolio's total
assets, less liabilities other than the obligations created by when-issued
commitments.
INVESTMENT COMPANY SECURITIES. Securities of other investment companies
may be acquired by the Portfolio to the extent permitted under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). These limits require that, as
determined immediately after a purchase is made, (i) not more than 5% of the
value of the Portfolio's total assets will be invested in the securities of any
one investment company, (ii) not more than 10% of the value of its total assets
will be invested in the aggregate in securities of investment companies as a
group, and (iii) not more than 3% of the outstanding voting stock of any one
investment company will be owned by the Portfolio. As a shareholder of another
investment company, the Portfolio would bear, along with other shareholders, its
pro rata portion of the other investment company's expenses, including advisory
fees. These expenses would be in addition to the advisory and other expenses
that the Portfolio bears directly in connection with its own operations.
<PAGE>
B-9
REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. The Portfolio may enter into reverse
repurchase agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Portfolio sells a
security and agrees to repurchase the same security at a mutually agreed upon
date and price. It may also be viewed as the borrowing of money by the Portfolio
and, therefore, is a form of leverage. The Portfolio will invest the proceeds of
borrowings under reverse repurchase agreements. In addition, the Portfolio will
enter into a reverse repurchase agreement only when the interest income to be
earned from the investment of the proceeds is greater than the interest expense
of the transaction. The Portfolio will not invest the proceeds of a reverse
repurchase agreement for a period which exceeds the duration of the reverse
repurchase agreement. The Portfolio may not enter into reverse repurchase
agreements exceeding in the aggregate one-third of the market value of its total
assets, less liabilities other than the obligations created by reverse
repurchase agreements. The Portfolio will establish and maintain with the
Custodian a separate account with a segregated portfolio of securities in an
amount at least equal to its purchase obligations under its reverse repurchase
agreements. See "Investment Restrictions" below.
LOANS OF PORTFOLIO SECURITIES. The Portfolio may lend its securities if
such loans are secured continuously by cash or equivalent collateral or by a
letter of credit in favor of the Portfolio at least equal at all times to 100%
of the market value of the securities loaned, plus accrued interest. While such
securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Portfolio any income accruing
thereon. Loans will be subject to termination by the Portfolio in the normal
settlement time, generally three business days after notice, or by the borrower
on one day's notice. Borrowed securities must be returned when the loan is
terminated. Any gain or loss in the market price of the borrowed securities
which occurs during the term of the loan inures to the Portfolio and its
investors. The Portfolio may pay reasonable finders' and custodial fees in
connection with a loan. In addition, the Portfolio will consider all facts and
circumstances including the creditworthiness of the borrowing financial
institution, and the Portfolio will not make any loans in excess of one year.
The Portfolio will not lend its securities to any officer, Trustee, Director,
employee or other affiliate of the Portfolio, the Advisor or the exclusive
placement agent, unless otherwise permitted by applicable law.
PRIVATELY PLACED AND CERTAIN UNREGISTERED SECURITIES. The Portfolio may
invest in privately placed, restricted, Rule 144A or other unregistered
securities as described in Part A.
As to illiquid investments, the Portfolio is subject to a risk that
should the Portfolio decide to sell them when a ready buyer is not available at
a price the Portfolio deems representative of their value, the value of the
Portfolio's net
<PAGE>
B-10
assets could be adversely affected. Where an illiquid security must be
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") before
it may be sold, the Portfolio may be obligated to pay all or part of the
registration expenses, and a considerable period may elapse between the time of
the decision to sell and the time the Portfolio may be permitted to sell a
security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period,
adverse market conditions were to develop, the Portfolio might obtain a less
favorable price than prevailed when it decided to sell.
SYNTHETIC VARIABLE RATE INSTRUMENTS. The Portfolio may invest in
certain synthetic variable rate instruments as described in Part A. In the case
of some types of instruments credit enhancement is not provided, and if certain
events, which may include (a) default in the payment of principal or interest on
the underlying bond, (b) downgrading of the bond below investment grade or (c) a
loss of the bond's tax exempt status, occur, then (i) the put will terminate,
and (ii) the risk to the Portfolio will be that of holding a long-term bond.
QUALITY AND DIVERSIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
The Portfolio is registered as a non-diversified investment company and
is not limited by the 1940 Act in the proportion of its assets that may be
invested in the obligations of a single issuer. Thus, the Portfolio may invest a
greater proportion of its assets in the securities of a smaller number of
issuers and, as a result, will be subject to greater risk with respect to its
portfolio securities. The Portfolio, however, will comply with the
diversification requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code"), to allow investors in the Portfolio to qualify as
regulated investment companies under Subchapter M of the Code.
For purposes of diversification under the Code and concentration under
the 1940 Act, identification of the issuer of municipal bonds or notes depends
on the terms and conditions of the obligation. If the assets and revenues of an
agency, authority, instrumentality or other political subdivision are separate
from those of the government creating the subdivision and the obligation is
backed only by the assets and revenues of the subdivision, such subdivision is
regarded as the sole issuer. Similarly, in the case of an industrial development
revenue bond or pollution control revenue bond, if the bond is backed only by
the assets and revenues of the nongovernmental user, the nongovernmental user is
regarded as the sole issuer. If in either case the creating government or
another entity guarantees an obligation, the guaranty is regarded as a separate
security and treated as an issue of such guarantor. Since securities issued or
guaranteed by states or municipalities are not voting securities, there is no
limitation on the percentage of a single issuer's securities which the Portfolio
may own so long as it does not invest more than 5% of its total assets that are
subject
<PAGE>
B-11
to the diversification limitation in the securities of such issuer, except
obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government. Consequently, the
Portfolio may invest in a greater percentage of the outstanding securities of a
single issuer than would an investment company which invests in voting
securities. See "Investment Restrictions" below.
The Portfolio invests principally in a diversified portfolio of
"investment grade" tax exempt securities. An investment grade bond is rated, on
the date of investment within the four highest ratings of Moody's, currently
Aaa, Aa, A and Baa, or of Standard & Poor's, currently AAA, AA, A and BBB, while
high grade debt is rated, on the date of the investment within the two highest
of such ratings. Investment grade municipal notes are rated, on the date of
investment, MIG-1 or MIG-2 by Standard & Poor's or SP-1 and SP-2 by Moody's.
Investment grade municipal commercial paper is rated, on the date of investment,
Prime 1 or Prime 2 by Moody's and A-1 or A-2 by Standard & Poor's. The Portfolio
may also invest up to 5% of its total assets in securities which are "below
investment grade". Such securities must be rated, on the date of investment, Ba
by Moody's or BB by Standard & Poor's. The Portfolio may invest in debt
securities which are not rated or other debt securities to which these ratings
are not applicable, if in the opinion of the Advisor, such securities are of
comparable quality to the rated securities discussed above. In addition, at the
time the Portfolio invests in any taxable commercial paper, bank obligation or
repurchase agreement, the issuer must have outstanding debt rated A or higher by
Moody's or Standard & Poor's, the issuer's parent corporation, if any, must have
outstanding commercial paper rated Prime-1 by Moody's or A-1 by Standard &
Poor's, or if no such ratings are available, the investment must be of
comparable quality in the Advisor's opinion.
In determining suitability of investment in a particular unrated
security, the Advisor takes into consideration asset and debt service coverage,
the purpose of the financing, history of the issuer, existence of other rated
securities of the issuer, and other relevant conditions, such as comparability
to other issuers.
OPTIONS AND FUTURES TRANSACTIONS
EXCHANGE TRADED AND OVER-THE-COUNTER-OPTIONS. All options purchased or
sold by the Portfolio will be traded on a securities exchange or will be
purchased or sold by securities dealers (over -the-counter or OTC options) that
meet creditworthiness standards approved by the Board of Trustees. While
exchange-traded options are obligations of the Options Clearing Corporation, in
the case of OTC options, the Portfolio relies on the dealer from which it
purchased the option to perform if the option is exercised. Thus, when the
Portfolio purchases an OTC option, it relies on the dealer from which it
purchased the option to make or take delivery of the underlying securities.
Failure by the dealer to do so would result in the loss of the premium paid by
the
<PAGE>
B-12
Portfolio as well as loss of the expected benefit of the transaction.
The staff of the SEC has taken the position that, in general, purchased
OTC options and the underlying securities used to cover written OTC options are
illiquid securities. However, the Portfolio may treat as liquid the underlying
securities used to cover written OTC options, provided it has arrangements with
certain qualified dealers who agree that the Portfolio may repurchase any option
it writes for a maximum price to be calculated by a predetermined formula. In
these cases, the OTC option itself would only be considered illiquid to the
extent that the maximum repurchase price under the formula exceeds the intrinsic
value of the option.
FUTURES CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS ON FUTURES CONTRACTS. In entering into
futures and options transactions the Portfolio may purchase or sell futures
contracts and purchase put and call options and sell (write) covered put and
call options on futures contracts. Futures contracts obligate the buyer to take
and the seller to make delivery at a future date of a specified quantity of a
financial instrument or an amount of cash based on the value of a securities
index. Currently, futures contracts are available on various types of fixed
income securities, including but not limited to U.S. Treasury bonds, notes and
bills, Eurodollar certificates of deposit and on indexes of fixed income
securities and indexes of equity securities.
Unlike a futures contract, which requires the parties to buy and sell a
security or make a cash settlement payment based on changes in a financial
instrument or securities index on an agreed date, an option on a futures
contract entitles its holder to decide on or before a future date whether to
enter into such a contract. If the holder decides not to exercise its option,
the holder may close out the option position by entering into an offsetting
transaction or may decide to let the option expire and forfeit the premium
thereon. The purchaser of an option on a futures contract pays a premium for the
option but makes no initial margin payments or daily payments of cash in the
nature of "variation" margin payments to reflect the change in the value of the
underlying contract as does a purchaser or seller of a futures contract.
The seller of an option on a futures contract receives the premium paid
by the purchaser and may be required to pay initial margin. Amounts equal to the
initial margin and any additional collateral required on any options on futures
contracts sold by the Portfolio are paid by the Portfolio into a segregated
account, in the name of the Futures Commission Merchant, as required by the 1940
Act and the SEC's interpretations thereunder.
COMBINED POSITIONS. The Portfolio may purchase and write options in
combination with each other, or in combination with
<PAGE>
B-13
futures or forward contracts, to adjust the risk and return characteristics of
the overall position. For example, the Portfolio may purchase a put option and
write a call option on the same underlying instrument, in order to construct a
combined position whose risk and return characteristics are similar to selling a
futures contract. Another possible combined position would involve writing a
call option at one strike price and buying a call option at a lower price, in
order to reduce the risk of the written call option in the event of a
substantial price increase. Because combined options positions involve multiple
trades, they result in higher transaction costs and may be more difficult to
open and close out.
CORRELATION OF PRICE CHANGES. Because there are a limited number of
types of exchange-traded options and futures contracts, it is likely that the
standardized options and futures contracts available will not match the
Portfolio's current or anticipated investments exactly. The Portfolio may invest
in options and futures contracts based on securities with different issuers,
maturities, or other characteristics from the securities in which it typically
invests, which involves a risk that the options or futures position will not
track the performance of the Portfolio's other investments.
Options and futures contracts prices can also diverge from the prices
of their underlying instruments, even if the underlying instruments match the
Portfolio's investments well. Options and futures contracts prices are affected
by such factors as current and anticipated short term interest rates, changes in
volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until expiration
of the contract, which may not affect security prices the same way. Imperfect
correlation may also result from differing levels of demand in the options and
futures markets and the securities markets, from structural differences in how
options and futures and securities are traded, or from imposition of daily price
fluctuation limits or trading halts. The Portfolio may purchase or sell options
and futures contracts with a greater or lesser value than the securities it
wishes to hedge or intends to purchase in order to attempt to compensate for
differences in volatility between the contract and the securities, although this
may not be successful in all cases. If price changes in the Portfolio's options
or futures positions are poorly correlated with its other investments, the
positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or result in losses that are not
offset by gains in other investments.
LIQUIDITY OF OPTIONS AND FUTURES CONTRACTS. There is no assurance a
liquid market will exist for any particular option or futures contract at any
particular time even if the contract is traded on an exchange. In addition,
exchanges may establish daily price fluctuation limits for options and futures
contracts and may halt trading if a contract's price moves up or down more than
the limit in a given day. On volatile trading days when the price fluctuation
limit is reached or a trading halt is imposed,
<PAGE>
B-14
it may be impossible for the Portfolio to enter into new positions or close out
existing positions. If the market for a contract is not liquid because of price
fluctuation limits or otherwise, it could prevent prompt liquidation of
unfavorable positions, and could potentially require the Portfolio to continue
to hold a position until delivery or expiration regardless of changes in its
value. As a result, the Portfolio's access to other assets held to cover its
options or futures positions could also be impaired. (See "Exchange Traded and
Over-the-Counter Options" above for a discussion of the liquidity of options
not traded on an exchange.)
POSITION LIMITS. Futures exchanges can limit the number of futures and
options on futures contracts that can be held or controlled by an entity. If an
adequate exemption cannot be obtained, the Portfolio or the Advisor may be
required to reduce the size of its futures and options positions or may not be
able to trade a certain futures or options contract in order to avoid exceeding
such limits.
ASSET COVERAGE FOR FUTURES CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS POSITIONS. The
Portfolio intends to comply with Section 4.5 of the regulations under the
Commodity Exchange Act, which limits the extent to which the Portfolio can
commit assets to initial margin deposits and option premiums. In addition, the
Portfolio will comply with guidelines established by the SEC with respect to
coverage of options and futures contracts by mutual funds, and if the guidelines
so require, will set aside appropriate liquid assets in a segregated custodial
account in the amount prescribed. Securities held in a segregated account cannot
be sold while the futures contract or option is outstanding, unless they are
replaced with other suitable assets. As a result, there is a possibility that
segregation of a large percentage of the Portfolio's assets could impede
portfolio management or the Portfolio's ability to meet redemption requests or
other current obligations.
RISK MANAGEMENT
The Portfolio may employ non-hedging risk management techniques.
Examples of such strategies include synthetically altering the duration of its
portfolio or the mix of securities in its portfolio. For example, if the Advisor
wishes to extend maturities in a fixed income portfolio in order to take
advantage of an anticipated decline in interest rates, but does not wish to
purchase the underlying long-term securities, it might cause the Portfolio to
purchase futures contracts on long-term debt securities. Similarly, if the
Advisor wishes wished to decrease fixed income securities or purchase equities,
it could cause the Portfolio to sell futures contracts on debt securities and
purchase futures contracts on a stock index. Such non-hedging risk management
techniques are not speculative, but because they involve leverage include, as do
all leveraged transactions, the possibility of
<PAGE>
B-15
losses as well as gains that are greater than if these techniques involved the
purchase and sale of the securities themselves rather than their synthetic
derivatives.
SPECIAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE PORTFOLIO. The Portfolio intends to
invest a high proportion of its assets in municipal obligations of the State of
New York and its political subdivisions, municipalities, agencies,
instrumentalities and public authorities. Payment of interest and preservation
of principal is dependent upon the continuing ability of New York issuers and/or
obligators of state, municipal and public authority debt obligations to meet
their obligations thereunder.
The fiscal stability of New York State is related, at least in part, to the
fiscal stability of its localities and authorities. Various State agencies,
authorities and localities have issued large amounts of bonds and notes either
guaranteed or supported by the State through lease-purchase arrangements, other
contractual arrangements or moral obligation provisions. While debt service is
normally paid out of revenues generated by projects of such State agencies,
authorities and localities, the State has had to provide special assistance in
the past, in some cases of a recurring nature, to enable such agencies,
authorities and localities to meet their financial obligations and, in some
cases, to prevent or cure defaults. To the extent State agencies and local
governments require State assistance to meet their financial obligations, the
ability of the State to meet its own obligations as they become due or to obtain
additional financing could be adversely affected.
On July 10, 1995, Standard & Poor's downgraded its rating on New York
city's outstanding general obligation bonds to BBB+ from A-, citing the city's
chronic structural budget problems and weak economic outlook. Moody's currently
rates New York City general obligation bonds Baa-l. Factors contributing to
these ratings include the city's reliance on one-time revenue measures to close
annual budget gaps, a dependence on unrealized labor savings, overly optimistic
estimates of revenues and of state and federal aid, and the city's continued
high debt levels.
For further information concerning New York municipal obligations, see
"Additional Information Concerning New York Municipal Obligations" below. The
summary set forth above and below is included for the purpose of providing a
general description of New York State and New York City credit and financial
conditions. This summary is based on information from an official statement of
New York general obligation municipal obligations and does not purport to be
complete.
<PAGE>
B-16
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING NEW YORK MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS
The following information is a summary of special factors affecting
investments in New York municipal obligations. It does not purport to be a
complete description and is based on information from the supplement (dated
March 20, 1996) to the Annual Information Statement of the State of New York
dated June 23, 1995 and other sources of information.
GENERAL
New York (the "State") is among the most populous states in the nation and
has a relatively high level of personal wealth. The State's economy is diverse
with a comparatively large share of the nation's finance, insurance,
transportation, communications and services employment, and a very small share
of the nation's farming and mining activity. The State's location, air transport
facilities and natural harbors have made it an important link in international
commerce. Travel and tourism constitute an important part of the economy. The
State has a declining proportion of its workforce engaged in manufacturing and
an increasing proportion engaged in service industries. This transition reflects
a national trend.
The State has historically been one of the wealthiest states in the nation.
The State economy has grown more slowly than that of the nation as a whole,
resulting in the gradual erosion of its relative economic affluence. Statewide,
urban centers have experienced significant changes involving migration of the
more affluent to the suburbs and an influx of generally less affluent residents.
Regionally, the older northeast cities have suffered because of the relative
success that the South and the West have had in attracting people and business.
New York City (the "City") has also had to face greater competition as other
major cities have developed financial and business capabilities which make them
less dependent on the specialized services traditionally available almost
exclusively in the City.
Although industry and commerce are broadly spread across the State,
particular activities are concentrated in the following areas: Westchester
County -- headquarters for several major corporations; Buffalo -- diverse
manufacturing base; Rochester -- manufacture of photographic and optical
equipment; Syracuse and Utica-Rome area -- production of machinery and
transportation equipment; Albany-Troy-Schenectady -- government and education
center and production of electrical products; Binghampton -- original site of
the International Business Machines Corporation and continued concentration of
employment in computer and other high technology manufacturing; and New York
City -- headquarters for the nation's securities business and for a major
portion of the nation's major commercial banks, diversified financial
institutions and life insurance companies. In addition, the City houses the home
offices of major radio and television broadcasting networks, many national
magazines and a substantial portion of the nation's book publishers. The City
also retains leadership in the design and manufacture of men's and women's
apparel and is traditionally a tourist destination.
<PAGE>
B-17
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
The economic and financial condition of the State may be affected by
various financial, social, economic and political factors. Those factors can be
very complex, may vary from fiscal year to fiscal year, and are frequently the
result of actions taken not only by the State and its agencies and
instrumentalities, but also by entities, such as the federal government, that
are not under the control of the State. The state financial plan is based upon
forecasts of national and State economic activity. Economic forecasts have at
times failed to predict precisely the timing and magnitude of changes in the
national and the State economies. Many uncertainties exist in forecasts of both
the national and State economies, including consumer attitudes toward spending,
the extent of corporate and governmental restructuring, federal financial and
monetary policies, the availability of credit, the level of interest rates, and
the condition of the world economy. All these could have an adverse effect on
the State. There can be no assurance that the State's economy will not
experience financial results in the current fiscal year that are worse than
predicted, with corresponding material and adverse effects on the State's
projections of receipts and disbursements.
The national economy achieved the desired "soft landing" in 1995, as growth
slowed from 6.2 percent in 1994 to a rate sufficiently slow to inhibit the
build-up of inflationary pressures. This was achieved without any material pause
in the economic expansion, although recession worries flared in the late spring
and early summer. Growth in the national economy is expected to moderate during
1996, with the nation's gross domestic product projected to expand by 4.6
percent in 1996 versus 5.0 percent in 1995. Declining short-term interest rates,
slowing employment growth and continued moderate inflation also characterize the
projected path for the nation's economy in the year ahead.
The annual growth rates of most economic indicators for the State improved
from 1994 to 1995, as the pace of private sector employment expansion and
personal income and wage growth all accelerated. Government employment fell as
workforce reductions were implemented at federal, state and local levels.
Similar to the nation, some moderation of growth is expected in the year ahead.
Private sector employment is expected to continue to rise, although somewhat
more slowly than in 1995, while public employment should continue to fall,
reflecting government budget cutbacks. Anticipated continued restraint in wage
settlements, a lower rate of employment growth and falling interest rates are
expected to slow personal income growth significantly.
The State has for many years had a very high State and local tax burden
relative to other states. The State and its localities have used these taxes to
develop and maintain their transportation networks, public schools and colleges,
public health systems, other social services and recreational facilities.
Despite these benefits, the burden of State and local taxation, in combination
with the many other causes of regional economic dislocation, may have
contributed to the decisions of some businesses and individuals to relocate
outside, or not locate within, the State.
To stimulate the State's economic growth, the State has developed programs,
including the provision of direct financial assistance, designed to assist
businesses to expand existing operations located within the State and to attract
new businesses to the State. Local industrial development agencies raised an
<PAGE>
B-18
aggregate of approximately $7.8 billion in separate tax-exempt bond issues
through December 31, 1993. There are currently over 100 county, city, town and
village agencies. In addition, the New York State Urban Development Corporation
is empowered to issue, subject to certain State constitutional restrictions and
to approval by the Public Authorities Control Board, bonds and notes on behalf
of private corporations for economic development projects. The State has also
taken advantage of changes in federal bank regulations to establish a free
international banking zone in the City.
In addition, the State has provided various tax incentives to encourage
business relocation and expansion. These programs include direct tax abatements
from local property taxes for new facilities (subject to locality approval) and
investment tax credits that are applied against the State corporation franchise
tax. Furthermore, legislation passed in 1986 authorizes the creation of up to 40
"economic development zones" in economically distressed regions of the State.
Businesses in these zones are provided a variety of tax and other incentives to
create jobs and make investments in the zones.
The executive budget contains comparatively few tax initiatives. However,
the Governor has set aside $50 million to finance a program of additional tax
cuts designed to spur private sector job creation in the State. The Governor
intends to work jointly with the business community and the legislature to
determine the elements of the program. For financial plan purposes, the $50
million is shown as a charge against the personal income tax, implemented
through a deposit to the refund reserve. Additional tax reductions were called
for by the Governor in his annual message to the legislature of January 3, 1996,
but no specific implementation plans have been announced.
STATE FINANCIAL PLAN
The State Constitution requires the Governor to submit to the legislature a
balanced executive budget which contains a complete plan of expenditures (the
"State Financial Plan") for the ensuing fiscal year and all moneys and revenues
estimated to be available therefor, accompanied by bills containing all proposed
appropriations or reappropriations and any new or modified revenue measures to
be enacted in connection with the executive budget. A final budget must be
approved before the statutory deadline of April 1. The State Financial Plan is
updated quarterly pursuant to law.
The State's fiscal year, which commenced on April 1, 1996, and ends on
March 31, 1997, is referred to herein as the State's 1996-97 fiscal year.
The State revised the cash-basis 1995-96 State Financial Plan on December 15,
1995, in conjunction with the release of the executive budget for the 1996-97
fiscal year.
The 1995-96 General Fund Financial Plan continues to be balanced, with
reductions in projected receipts offset by an equivalent reduction in projected
disbursements. Modest changes were made to the mid-year update, reflecting two
more months of actual results, deficiency requests by State agencies (the
largest of which is for school aid resulting from revisions to data submitted by
school districts), and administrative efficiencies achieved by State agencies.
Total General Fund receipts are expected to be approximately $73 million lower
than estimated at the time of the mid-year update. Tax receipts are now
projected to
<PAGE>
B-19
be $29.57 billion, $8 million less than in the earlier plan. Miscellaneous
receipts and transfers from other funds are estimated at $3.15 billion, $65
million lower than in the mid-year update. The largest single change in these
estimates is attributable to the lag in achieving $50 million in proceeds from
sales of State assets, which are unlikely to be completed prior to the end of
the fiscal year.
Projected General Fund disbursements are reduced by a total of $73 million,
with changes made in most major categories of the 1995-96 State Financial Plan.
The reduction in overall spending masks the impact of deficiency requests
totaling more than $140 million, primarily for school aid and tuition assistance
to college students. Offsetting reductions in spending are attributable to the
continued maintenance of strict controls on spending through the fiscal year by
State agencies, yielding savings of $50 million. Reductions of $49 million in
support for capital projects reflect a stringent review of all capital spending.
Reductions of $30 million in debt service costs reflect savings from refundings
undertaken in the current fiscal year, as well as savings from lower interest
rates in the financial market. Finally, the 1995-96 Financial Plan reflects
reestimates based on actual results through November, the largest of which is a
reduction of $70 million in projected costs for income maintenance. This
reduction is consistent with declining caseload projections.
The balance in the General Fund at the close of the 1995-96 fiscal year is
expected to be $172 million, entirely attributable to monies in the Tax
Stabilization Reserve Fund following the required $15 million payment into that
Fund. A $40 million deposit to the Contingency Reserve Fund included as part of
the enacted 1995-96 budget will not be made, and the minor balance of $1 million
currently in the Fund will be transferred to the General Fund. These Contingency
Reserve Fund monies are expected to support payments from the General Fund for
litigation related to the State's Medicaid program, and for federal
disallowances.
Changes in federal aid programs currently pending in Congress are not
expected to have a material impact on the State's 1995-96 Financial Plan,
although prolonged interruptions in the receipt of federal grants could create
adverse developments, the scope of which cannot be estimated at this time. The
major remaining uncertainties in the 1995-96 State Financial Plan continue to be
those related to the economy and tax collections, which could produce either
favorable or unfavorable variances during the balance of the year.
The Governor presented his 1996-97 executive budget to the legislature on
December 15, 1995, one month before the legal deadline. The executive budget
also contains financial projections for the State's 1997-98 and 1998-99 fiscal
years and an updated Capital Plan. As provided by the State Constitution, the
Governor submitted amendments to his 1996-97 executive budget within 30 days
following submission. Those amendments are reflected in the discussion of the
1996-97 executive budget contained herein. There can be no assurance that the
legislature will enact the executive budget as proposed by the Governor into
law, or that the State's adopted budget projections will not differ materially
and adversely from the projections.
The 1996-97 Financial Plan projects balance on a cash basis in the General
Fund. It reflects a continuing strategy of substantially reduced State spending,
including program restructuring, reductions in social welfare spending, and
<PAGE>
B-20
efficiency and productivity initiatives. Total General Fund receipts and
transfers from other funds are projected to be $31.32 billion, a decrease of
$1.4 billion from total receipts projected in the current fiscal year. Total
General Fund disbursements and transfers to other funds are projected to be
$31.22 billion, a decrease of $l.5 billion from spending totals projected for
the current fiscal year. After adjustments and transfers for comparability
between the 1995-96 and 1996-97 State Financial Plans, the executive budget
proposes an absolute year-to-year decline in General Fund spending of 5.8
percent. Spending from all funding sources (including federal aid) is proposed
to increase by 0.4 percent from the prior fiscal year after adjustments and
transfers for comparability.
The executive budget proposes $3.9 billion in actions to balance the
1996-97 Financial Plan. Before reflecting any actions proposed by the Governor
to restrain spending, General Fund disbursements for 1996-97 were projected at
$35 billion, an increase of $2.3 billion or 7 percent from 1995-96. This
increase would have resulted from growth in Medicaid, inflationary increases in
school aid, higher fixed costs such as pensions and debt service, collective
bargaining agreements, inflation, and the loss of non-recurring resources that
offset spending in 1995-96. Receipts would have been expected to fall by $l.6
billion. This reduction would have been attributable to modest growth in the
State's economy and underlying tax base, the loss of non-recurring revenues
available in 1995-96 and implementation of previously enacted tax reduction
programs.
The executive budget proposes to close this gap primarily through a series
of spending reductions and cost containment measures. The executive budget
projects (i) over $1.8 billion in savings from cost containment and other
actions in social welfare programs, including Medicaid, welfare and various
health and mental health programs; (ii) $1.3 billion in savings from a reduced
State General Fund share of Medicaid made available from anticipated changes in
the federal Medicaid program, including an increase in the federal share of
Medicaid; (iii) over $450 million in savings from reforms and cost avoidance in
educational services (including school aid and higher education), while
providing fiscal relief from certain State mandates that increase local
spending; and (iv) $350 million in savings from efficiencies and reductions in
other State programs. The assumption regarding an increased share of federal
Medicaid funding has received bipartisan congressional support and would benefit
the State and 31 other states.
The 1996-97 Financial Plan projects receipts of $31.32 billion and spending
of $31.22 billion, allowing for a deposit of $85 million to the Contingency
Reserve Fund and a required repayment of $15 million to the Tax Stabilization
Reserve Fund. Detailed explanations of the 1996-97 Financial Plan follow a
discussion of the economic outlook.
The Governor has submitted several amendments to the executive budget.
These amendments have a nominal impact on the State's Financial Plan for 1996-97
and the subsequent years. The net impact of the amendments leaves unchanged the
total estimated amount of General Fund spending in 1996-97, which continues to
be projected at $31.22 billion. All funds spending in 1996-97 is increased by
$68 million, primarily reflecting adjustments to projections of federal funds,
and now totals $63.87 billion.
<PAGE>
B-21
The budget amendments advanced by the Governor involving largely technical
revisions, with General Fund spending increases fully offset by spending
decreases. Reductions in estimated 1996-97 disbursements are recommended
primarily for welfare (associated with updated projections showing a declining
caseload) and debt service (reflecting lower interest rates and recent bond
sales). Disbursement increases are projected for snow and ice control, the AIDS
Institute, Health Department utilization review programs and other items.
Estimated disbursements for other funds are increased to accommodate updated
projections of federal funding in certain categorical grant programs and reduced
for welfare as noted for the General Fund.
GOVERNMENT FUNDS
The four governmental fund types that comprise the State Financial Plan are
the General Fund, the Special Revenue Funds, the Capital Projects Funds, and the
Debt Service Funds.
GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS
The 1996-97 Financial Plan projects General Fund receipts (including
transfers from other funds) of $31.32 billion, a decrease of $1.40 billion from
the 1995-96 projected level. Measured against 1995-96 levels that have been
adjusted for purposes of comparability, the decline is $1.83 billion or 5.5
percent. These 1995-96 comparability adjustments include adding back personal
income tax collections that were not recognized in 1995-96 as a result of Local
Government Assistance Corporation ("LGAC")-related transactions in that year,
and the addition of special revenue funds moved in the executive budget to the
General Fund. The estimate of taxes for 1996-97 reflects overall growth in the
yield of the tax structures (when adjusted for tax law and administrative
changes) of slightly less than 3.5 percent, reflecting a slower growing economy
and continued moderate inflation. The effects of this growth are offset by the
impact of previously enacted tax reductions. The value of these tax reductions
is currently estimated to be approximately $500 million in 1994-95, nearly $1.5
billion in 1995-96 and over $3.7 billion in 1996-97.
Personal income tax collections for 1996-97 are now expected to be $16.05
billion, a decline of nearly $827 million from the projected 1995-96 level.
These estimates reflect growth in "constant law" liability of about 4.5 percent
in 1996, down from an estimated 6.5 percent growth in 1995. This increase is
more than offset by personal income tax reductions already in law, which are
estimated to produce taxpayer savings in 1996-97 of almost $2.5 billion, or $1.8
billion more than in the current year.
User tax and fee receipts are projected at $6.7 billion in 1996-97, up $48
million from 1995-96 projected levels. Total collections in this category are
dominated by the State sales and use tax, which accounts for 75 percent of total
receipts in the category. The moderate economic expansion experienced this year
and anticipated for next year produces estimated growth in the yield of the
sales and use tax of 3.2 percent in 1995-96 and 3.3 percent in 1996-97.
Total business taxes are now projected at $4.55 billion in 1996-97. While
"constant-law" liability growth is anticipated to continue in 1996-97, the
effect of additional tax reductions taking effect in 1996 will lead to a
year-to-year decline between 1996-96 and 1996-97 of $441 million. These business
tax
<PAGE>
B-22
reductions, which are estimated to depress receipts by over $600 million in the
current year, will grow to nearly $l.0 billion in 1996-97.
Other tax receipts are now projected at $1.01 billion, down $51 million
from the 1995-96 projected level. The decline in receipts in this category
reflects the effects of tax reductions enacted in the last two years as well as
the earmarking of a portion of the real estate transfer tax to the Environmental
Protection Fund. Tax cuts in this category, largely in the real property gains
tax and the estate tax, are estimated at $32 million in 1994-95, $67 million in
1995-96 and $115 million in 1996-97.
Miscellaneous receipts, which include license revenues, fee and fine
income, investment income and abandoned property proceeds, as well as the
proceeds of the largest share of the State's medical provider assessment and
various one-time transactions, are now estimated to total $1.41 billion in
1996-97. This represents a decline of $119 million from 1995-96 projected
levels. Transfers from other funds consist primarily of sales tax revenues in
excess of debt service requirements used to support debt service payments to
LGAC. Projected amounts in this category for 1996-97 total $1.61 billion, a
decline of $8 million from 1995-96 levels.
DISBURSEMENTS
The 1996-97 Financial Plan projects General Fund disbursements of $31.22
billion. Projected spending decreases $1.48 billion, or 4.5 percent, from the
estimated current year. After adjustments to 1995-96 levels for purposes of
comparability, the decline is $l.91 billion or 5.8 percent. These comparability
adjustments are composed of two major actions. The first eliminates the impact
of LGAC financings, which depressed General Fund spending in 1995-96 by $271
million. The second adjustment adds $159 million in projected 1995-96 spending
currently budgeted in Special Revenue Funds, but recommended as part of the
General Fund in the 1996-97 budget.
Support for local governments is projected to decrease $1.7 billion,
primarily reflecting decreased support for social programs. General Fund support
for Medicaid is projected to be $1.65 billion lower than 1995-96, as a result of
both new cost containment proposals and the anticipated use of $1.3 billion in
federal Medicaid revenues that would become available assuming enactment of
proposed federal changes in this program. This proposed offset to the State
share of Medicaid would require the implementation of a federal block grant for
Medicaid and an increase in the federal share of Medicaid from 50 percent to 60
percent. Welfare costs also decline ($164 million), reflecting projected
caseload declines, time limits on benefits, reductions in benefits, and
continuation of workfare and anti-fraud initiatives begun in 1995-96.
General Fund support for education programs would increase by $188
million. However, this increase results from changes in the school aid payment
schedule, and the payment in 1995-96 of a portion of school aid from LGAC bond
proceeds. School aid is expected to increase $26 million on a school year basis.
Support for both State University (SUNY) and City University (CUNY) would
decline, and the State's tuition assistance program would be reduced to achieve
savings.
Support for State agency operations would decline to $6.0 billion in
1996-97 including transfers to support SUNY operations. Annual decreases for
<PAGE>
B-23
agencies range widely from as low as 0.3 percent to as high as 25 percent. This
decline reflects the reductions to the State's workforce. The executive budget
recommends reductions of approximately 7,400 positions, undertaken primarily
through attrition and other actions. Assuming these reductions are implemented,
the State's workforce will have declined by more than 20,000 positions between
January 1995 and the end of the 1996-97 fiscal year.
General State charges are projected to total $2.32 billion in 1996-97, an
increase of $252 million from 1995-96 projected levels. Pension costs are
expected to increase by $177 million in 1996-97, primarily as a result of the
return of the New York State and Local Retirement System from the projected unit
credit actuarial method to the aggregate cost actuarial method. Health insurance
costs are projected to increase 6 percent for calendar years 1996 and 1997.
Workers' compensation costs are projected to grow by 4.5 percent.
General Fund debt service includes short-term obligations of the State's
commercial paper program and debt service on its long-term bonds, which are
reflected as transfers to the General Debt Service Fund. Projected short-term
debt service costs are expected to be $12 million for 1996-97. Transfers in
support of debt service are projected to grow by 5.5 percent to $1.62 billion in
1996-97, as the State continues to use bonds to support its capital projects.
However, the rate of increase in debt service has slowed considerably from the
pace of the previous decade. In 1996-97, bonds are expected to support 44
percent of the State's capital project disbursements, compared to 48 percent in
1995-96. The $172 million transfer to the Capital Projects Fund in 1996-97 has
been reduced by $154 million from projected levels for 1995-96, reflecting
project eliminations and the deposit of funds released as a result of a
refunding of certain Housing Finance Agency bonds supported by State
appropriations. General Fund support for the operations of SUNY is proposed for
transfer into a single unified fund for all SUNY operations.
NON-RECURRING RESOURCES
The Division of the Budget estimates that the 1996-97 Financial Plan
includes approximately $123 million in non-recurring resources, comprising 0.4
percent of the General Fund budget--a decrease of almost 86 percent from last
year's level. These include $47 million in various Medicaid actions, $40 million
from a refunding of Housing Finance Agency bonds, $19 million in recoupment of
payments to providers in health and mental health, and $17 million in revenue
transfers. These non-recurring savings are almost entirely offset by
non-recurring costs within the 1996-97 budget. In addition, the recommendations
included in the executive budget are expected to provide fully annualized
savings in 1997-98 which more than offset the non-recurring resources used in
1996-97.
GENERAL FUND CLOSING FUND BALANCE
The 1996-97 closing fund balance in the General Fund is projected to be
$272 million. The required deposit to the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund adds
$15 million to the 1995-96 balance of $172 million in that fund, bringing the
total to $187 million at the close of 1996-97. The retraining General Fund
balance reflects the deposit of $85 million to the Contingency Reserve Fund, to
provide resources to finance potential costs associated with litigation against
the State. This deposit is expected to be made pursuant to legislation submitted
<PAGE>
B-24
with the executive budget which will require the State share of certain
non-recurring federal recoveries to be deposited to the Contingency Reserve
Fund.
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
For 1996-97, the Financial Plan projects disbursements of $28.93 billion
from Special Revenue Funds. This includes $7.65 billion from Special Revenue
Funds containing State revenues, and $21.28 billion from funds containing
federal grants, primarily for social welfare programs.
The 1996-97 Executive Budget recommends that all of the SUNY's revenues be
consolidated in a single fund, permitting SUNY more flexibility and control in
the use of its revenues. As a result of this proposal, General Fund support
would be transferred to this fund, rather than spent directly from the General
Fund. SUNY's spending from this fund is projected to total $2.55 billion in
1996-97. The Mass Transportation Operating Assistance Fund and the Dedicated
Mass Transportation Trust Fund, which receive taxes earmarked for mass
transportation programs throughout the State, are projected to have total
disbursements of $1.23 billion in 1996-97. Disbursements also include $1.63
billion in lottery proceeds which, after payment of administrative expenses,
permit the distribution of $1.43 billion for education purposes. One hundred
million dollars of lottery proceeds will be reserved in a separate account for a
local school tax reduction program to be agreed upon by the Governor and the
legislature for disbursement in State fiscal year 1997-98. Disbursements of $650
million in 1996-97 from the Disproportionate Share Medicaid Assistance Fund
constitutes most of the remaining estimated State Special Revenue Funds
disbursements.
Federal special revenue fund projections for 1996-97 were developed in the
midst of considerable uncertainty as to the ultimate composition of the federal
budget, including uncertainties regarding major federal entitlement reforms.
Disbursements are estimated at $21.27 billion in 1996-97, an increase of $2.02
billion, or 10.5 percent from 1995-96. The projections included in the 1996-97
State Financial Plan assume that the federal Medicaid program will be reformed
generally along the lines of the congressional MediGrant program. This would
include an increase from 50 percent to 60 percent in the federal share of New
York's Medicaid expenses. A repeal of the federal Boren amendment regarding
provider rates is also anticipated. As a result of these changes, the executive
budget projects the receipt of $13.1 billion in total federal Medicaid
reimbursements in 1996-97, an increase of approximately $915 million from the
1995-96 level.
The second largest projected increase in federal reimbursement is for the
State's welfare program. The State is projected to receive $2.5 billion, up $421
million from 1995-96 levels, primarily because of increased funding anticipated
from the proposed federal welfare block grant. All other federal spending is
projected at $5.7 billion for 1996-97, an increase of $626 million.
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Disbursements from the Capital Projects funds in 1996-97 are estimated at
$3.76 billion. This estimate is $332 million less than the 1995-96 projections.
The spending reductions are the result of program restructuring, achieved in
1995-96 and continued in the 1996-97 Financial Plan. The spending plan includes:
<PAGE>
B-25
$2.5 billion in disbursements for the second year of the five-year
$12.6 billion state and local highway and bridge program;
Environmental Protection Fund spending of $106.5 million;
Correctional services spending of $153 million; and
SUNY and CUNY capital spending of $196 million and $87 million,
respectively.
The share of capital projects to be financed by "pay-as-you-go" resources
is projected to hold steady in 1996-97 at approximately 27 percent.
State-supported bond issuances finance 44 percent of capital projects, with
federal grants financing the remaining 29 percent.
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Disbursements from Debt Service Funds are estimated at $2.64 billion in
1996-97, an increase of $206 million or 9 percent from 1995-96. Of this
increase, $85 million is attributable to transportation bonding for the state
and local highway and bridge programs which are financed by the Dedicated
Highway and Bridge Trust Fund, $35 million is for corrections including new debt
service on prisons recently purchased from New York City, and $27 million is for
the mental hygiene programs financed through the Mental Health Services Fund.
Debt service for LGAC bonds increases only slightly after years of significant
increases, as the new-money bond issuance portion of the LGAC program was
completed in state fiscal year 1995-96. Increased debt service costs primarily
reflect prior capital commitments financed by bonds issued by the state and its
public authorities, the reduced use of capitalized interest, and the use of
shorter term bonds, such as the 10 year average maturity for the Dedicated
Highway and Bridge Trust Fund bonds.
CASH FLOW
In State fiscal year 1996-97, the General Fund cash flow will not depend on
either short-term spring borrowing or the issuance of LGAC bonds. The new-money
bond issuance portion of the LGAC program was completed in 1995-96, and
provisions prohibiting the state from returning to a reliance upon cash flow
manipulation to balance its budget will remain in bond covenants until the LGAC
bonds are retired.
The 1996-97 cash flow projects substantial closing balances in each quarter
of the fiscal year, with excesses in receipts over disbursements for the first
three quarters until the last quarter of the fiscal year when local assistance
payments (primarily for school aid) drive a deficiency. The closing fund balance
is projected at $272 million. The cash flow projections assume continuation of
legislation enacted in 1995-96 that permits the state to use balances in the
Lottery Fund for cash flow purposes. These temporary transfers are returned
during the second quarter of the fiscal year so that all lottery monies and
advances of additional aid can be paid to school districts in September.
<PAGE>
B-26
OUTYEAR PROJECTIONS OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS
The 1996-97 executive budget includes actions that would have an impact
on receipts and disbursements in future fiscal years. The Governor has proposed
closing the 1996-97 budget gap primarily through expenditure reductions and
without increases in taxes or deferrals of scheduled tax reductions. After
accounting for proposed changes to the executive budget submitted during the
30-day amendment period, the net impact of these actions is expected to produce
a potential imbalance in the 1997-98 fiscal year of $l.44 billion and in the
1998-99 fiscal year of $2.46 billion, assuming implementation of the 1996-97
Executive Budget recommendations. For 1997-98, receipts are estimated at $30.62
billion and disbursements at $32.05 billion. For 1998-99, receipts are estimated
at $31.85 billion and disbursements at $34.32 billion.
The outyear receipts estimates assume implementation of current law tax
reductions and the impact of the recommendations affecting receipts proposed in
the executive budget, including new tax relief. Tax reductions proposed by the
Governor in his annual message to the legislature of January 3, 1996 are not
included in these estimates. Already enacted tax reductions, which are estimated
to total more than $3.7 billion in 1996-97, rise to approximately $5.6 billion
in 1997-98 and approximately $6.0 billion in the following year. Tax reductions
recommended in the executive budget have a fully annualized cost of $75 million.
The economic scenario assumes steady, moderate growth in the national economy
through the period. Underlying "constant law" growth in receipts approximates 4
percent in 1997-98 and 4.5 percent in 1998-99. No extraordinary one-time
receipts are anticipated at this time. In addition, the projections assume a
continuation of federal tax law in effect as of year end 1995.
Outyear projections of spending, absent the impact of recommendations in
the executive budget and future executive and legislative action, would grow by
3.0 and 3.5 percent in 1997-98 and 1998-99, respectively. Spending growth is
fueled mainly by Medicaid costs. The outyear value of the recommendations
contained in the executive budget grow steadily over the next two years,
moderating the outyear growth. Projected disbursements for 1997-98 grow by only
2.7 percent, with restrained growth in all categories of the State Financial
Plan. However, in 1998-99, the increased diversion of lottery proceeds to fund
school tax relief combines with an extra payroll and Medicaid cycle to drive
growth in disbursements of just over 7 percent.
Reduced bond issuances in 1996-97 will help hold down future debt service
growth. State-supported debt is projected to grow at 3.7 percent average annual
rate over the next five years. Outstanding debt as a percentage of personal
income is projected to decline to under 6 percent over this same period.
PRIOR FISCAL YEARS
New York State's financial operations have improved during recent fiscal
years. During the period 1989-90 through 1991-92, the State incurred General
Fund operating deficits that were closed with receipts from the issuance of tax
and revenue anticipation notes ("TRANs"). First, the national recession, and
then the lingering economic slowdown in the New York and regional economy,
resulted in repeated shortfalls in receipts and three budget deficits. Through
fiscal year 1995, the State recorded balanced budgets on a cash basis, with
substantial fund balances in each year as described below.
<PAGE>
B-27
1994-95 FISCAL YEAR
New York State ended its 1994-95 fiscal year with the General Fund in
balance. The closing fund balance of $158 million reflects $157 million in the
Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund and $1 million in the Contingency Reserve Fund
("CRF"). The CRF was established in State Fiscal year 1993-94, funded partly
with surplus moneys, to assist the State in financing the 1994-95 fiscal year
costs of extraordinary litigation known or anticipated at that time; the opening
fund balance in State fiscal year 1994-95 was $265 million. The $241 million
change in the fund balance reflects the use of $264 million in the CRF as
planned, as well as the required deposit of $23 million to the Tax Stabilization
Reserve Fund. In addition, $278 million was on deposit in the tax refund reserve
account, $250 million of which was deposited at the end of the State's 1994-95
fiscal year to continue the process of restructuring the State's cash flow as
part of the LGAC program.
Compared to the State Financial Plan for 1994-95 as formulated on June 16,
1994, reported receipts fell short of original projections by $1.163 billion,
primarily in the categories of personal income and business taxes. Of this
amount, the personal income tax accounts for $800 million, reflecting weak
estimated tax collections and lower withholding due to reduced wage and salary
growth, more severe reductions in brokerage industry bonuses than projected
earlier, and deferral of capital gains realizations in anticipation of potential
federal tax changes. Business taxes fell short by $373 million, primarily
reflecting lower payments from banks as substantial overpayments of 1993
liability depressed net collections in the 1994-95 fiscal year. These shortfalls
were offset by better performance in the remaining taxes, particularly the user
taxes and fees, which exceeded projections by $210 million. Of this amount $227
million was attributable to certain restatements for accounting treatment
purposes pertaining to the CRF and LGAC; these restatements had no impact on
balance in the General Fund.
Disbursements were also reduced from original projections by $848 million.
After adjusting for the net impact of restatements relating to the CRF and LGAC
which raised disbursements by $38 million, the variance is $886 million. Well
over two-thirds of this variance is in the category of grants to local
governments, primarily reflecting the conservative nature of the original
estimates of projected costs for social services and other programs. Lower
education costs are attributable to the availability of $110 million in
additional lottery proceeds and the use of LGAC bond proceeds.
The spending reductions also reflect $188 million in actions initiated in
January 1995 by the Governor to reduce spending to avert a potential gap in the
1994-95 State Financial Plan. These actions included savings from a hiring
freeze, halting the development of certain services, and the suspension of
non-essential capital projects. These actions, together with $71 million in
other measures comprised the Governor's $259 million gap-closing plan, submitted
to the legislature in connection with the 1995-96 Executive Budget.
1993-94 FISCAL YEAR
The State ended its 1993-94 fiscal year with a balance of $1.140 billion in
the tax refund reserve account, $265 million in the CRF and $134 million in its
Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund. These fund balances were primarily the result of
an improving national economy, State employment growth, tax collections that
exceeded earlier projections and disbursements that were below expectations.
<PAGE>
B-28
Deposits to the personal income tax refund reserve have the effect of reducing
reported personal income tax receipts in the fiscal year when made and
withdrawals from such reserve increase receipts in the fiscal year when made.
The balance in the tax refund reserve account was used to pay taxpayer refunds.
Of the $1.140 billion deposited in the tax refund reserve account, $1.026
billion was available for budgetary planning purposes in the 1994-95 fiscal
year. The remaining $114 million was redeposited in the tax refund reserve
account at the end of the State's 1994-95 fiscal year to continue the process of
restructuring the State's cash flow as part of the LGAC program. The balance in
the CRF was reserved to meet the cost of litigation facing the State in its
1994-95 fiscal year.
Before the deposit of $1.140 billion in the tax refund reserve account,
General Fund receipts in 1993-94 exceeded those originally projected when the
State Financial Plan for that year was formulated on April 16, 1993 by $1.002
billion. Greater-than-expected receipts in the personal income tax, the bank
tax, the corporation franchise tax and the estate tax accounted for most of this
variance, and more than offset weaker-than-projected collections from the sales
and use tax and miscellaneous receipts. Collections from individual taxes were
affected by various factors including changes in federal business laws,
sustained profitability of banks, strong performance of securities firms, and
higher-than-expected consumption of tobacco products following price cuts.
The higher receipts resulted, in part, because the New York economy
performed better than forecasted. Employment growth started in the first quarter
of the State's 1993-94 fiscal year, and, although this lagged behind the
national economic recovery, the growth in New York began earlier than
forecasted. The New York economy exhibited signs of strength in the service
sector, in construction, and in trade. Long Island and the Mid-Hudson Valley
continued to lag behind the rest of the State in economic growth. The State
Division of the Budget believes that approximately 100,000 jobs were added
during the 1993-94 fiscal year.
Disbursements and transfers from the General Fund were $303 million below
the level projected in April 1993, an amount that would have been $423 million
had the State not accelerated the payment of Medicaid billings, which in the
April 1993 State Financial Plan were planned to be deferred into the 1994-95
fiscal year. Compared to the estimates included in the State Financial Plan
formulated in April 1993, lower disbursements resulted from lower spending for
Medicaid, capital projects, and debt service (due to refundings) and $114
million used to restructure the State's cash flow as part of the LGAC program.
Disbursements were higher than expected for general support for public schools,
the State share of income maintenance, overtime for prison guards, and highway
snow and ice removal. The State also made the first of six required payments to
the State of Delaware related to the settlement of Delaware's litigation against
the State regarding the disposition of abandoned property receipts.
During the 1993-94 fiscal year, the State also established and funded the
CRF as a way to assist the State in financing the cost of litigation affecting
the State. The CRF was initially funded with a transfer of $100 million
attributable to the positive margin recorded in the 1992-93 fiscal year. In
addition, the State augmented this initial deposit with $132 million in debt
service savings attributable to the refinancing of State and public authority
bonds during 1993-94. A year-end transfer of $36 million was also made to the
<PAGE>
B-29
CRF, which, after a disbursement for authorized fund purposes, brought the CRF
balance at the end of 1993-94 to $265 million. This amount was $165 million
higher than the amount originally targeted for this reserve fund.
1992-93 FISCAL YEAR
The State ended its 1992-93 fiscal year with a balance of $671 million
in the tax refund reserve account and $67 million in the Tax Stabilization
Reserve Fund.
The State's 1992-93 fiscal year was characterized by performance that was
better than projected for the national and regional economies. National gross
domestic product, State personal income, and State employment and unemployment
performed better than originally projected in April 1992. This favorable
economic performance, particularly at year end, combined with a tax-induced
acceleration of income into 1992, was the primary cause of the General Fund
surplus. Personal income tax collections were more than $700 million higher than
originally projected (before reflecting the tax refund reserve account
transaction), primarily in the withholding and estimated payment components of
the tax.
There were large, but mainly offsetting, variances in other categories of
receipts. Significantly higher-than-projected business tax collections and the
receipt of unbudgeted payments from the Medical Malpractice Insurance
Association ("MMIA") and the New York Racing Association approximately offset
the loss of an anticipated $200 million federal reimbursement, the loss of
certain budgeted hospital differential revenue as a result of unfavorable court
decisions, and shortfalls in certain miscellaneous revenues.
Disbursements and transfers to other funds were $45 million above
projections in April 1992, although this includes a $150 million payment to
health insurers (financed with a receipt from the MMIA made pursuant to
legislation passed in January 1993). All other disbursements were $105 million
lower than projected. This reduction primarily reflected lower costs in
virtually all categories of spending, including Medicaid, local health programs,
agency operations, fringe benefits, capital projects and debt service as
partially offset by higher-than-anticipated costs for education programs.
CERTAIN LITIGATION
The legal proceedings noted below involve State finances, State programs
and miscellaneous tort, real property and contract claims in which the State is
a defendant and the monetary damages sought are substantial. These proceedings
could affect adversely the financial condition of the State in the 1995-96
fiscal year or thereafter. The State will describe newly initiated proceedings.
Among the more significant of these cases are those that involve: (i) the
validity of agreements and treaties by which various Indian tribes transferred
to New York title to certain land in New York; (ii) certain aspects of New
York's Medicaid rates and regulations, including reimbursements to providers of
mandatory and optional Medicaid services, and the eligibility for and nature of
home care services; (iii) challenges to provisions of Section 2807-C of the
Public Health Law, which impose a 13% surcharge on inpatient hospital bills paid
by commercial insurers and employee welfare benefit plans and portions of
Chapter 55 of the laws of 1992, which require hospitals to impose and remit to
<PAGE>
B-30
the State an 11% surcharge on hospital bills paid by commercial insurers and
which require health maintenance organizations to remit to the State a surcharge
of up to 9%; (iv) two cases challenge provisions of Section 2807-c of the Public
Health Law, which impose a 13 percent surcharge on inpatient hospital bills paid
by commercial insurers and employee welfare benefit plans, and portions of
Chapter 55 of the Laws of 1992 which require hospitals to impose and remit to
the State an 11 percent surcharge on hospital bills paid by commercial insurers
and which require health maintenance organizations to remit to the State a
surcharge of up to 9 percent--in The Travelers Insurance Company v. Cuomo, et
al., commenced June 2, 1992, and The Health Insurance Association of America, et
al. v. Chassin, a al., commenced July 20, 1992, both in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York and consolidated,
plaintiffs allege that the surcharges are preempted by federal law (by decision
dated April 26, 1995, the United States Supreme Court upheld the surcharges as
not preempted by federal law); (v) challenges to the practice of reimbursing
certain Office of Mental Health patient care expenses from the client's Social
Security benefits; and (vi) alleged responsibility of New York officials to
assist in remedying racial segregation in the City of Yonkers. In addition,
aspects of petroleum business taxes are the subject of administrative claims and
litigation.
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
The fiscal health of the State of New York is closely related to the fiscal
health of its localities, particularly the City, which has required and
continues to require significant financial assistance from New York. The City's
independently audited operating results for each of its 1981 through 1993 fiscal
years showed a General Fund surplus reported in accordance with GAAP. In
addition, the City's financial statements for the 1995 fiscal year received an
unqualified opinion from the City's independent auditors, the eleventh
consecutive year the City received such an opinion.
As required by the Office of the State Deputy Comptroller for the City of
New York (the "OSDC"), the 1997-1998 Financial Plan reflects a program of
proposed actions by the City to close the gaps between projected revenues and
expenditures of $1.4 billion, $2.2 billion and 2.9 billion for the 1998, 1999
and 2000 fiscal years, respectively. These actions, a substantial number of
which are not specified in detail, include additional agency spending
reductions, reduction in entitlements, government procurement initiatives,
revenue initiatives and the availability of the general reserve.
The OSDC and the State Financial Control Board continue their respective
budgetary oversight activities.
In response to the City's fiscal crisis in 1975, the State took action to
assist the City in returning to fiscal stability. Among those actions, the State
established the Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of New York (the
"MAC") to provide financing assistance to the City; the New York State Financial
Control Board (the "Control Board") to oversee the City's financial affairs; the
Office of the State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York to assist the
Control Board in exercising its powers and responsibilities; and a "Control
Period" from 1975 to 1986 during which the City was subject to certain
statutorily-prescribed fiscal-monitoring arrangements. Although the Control
Board terminated the Control Period in 1986 when certain statutory conditions
were met, thus suspending certain Control Board powers, the Control Board, MAC
and OSDC
<PAGE>
B-31
continue to exercise various fiscal-monitoring functions over the City, and
upon the occurrence or "substantial likelihood and imminence" of the occurrence
of certain events, including, but not limited to a City operating budget deficit
of more than $100 million, the Control Board is required by law to reimpose a
Control Period. Currently, the City and its Covered Organizations (I.E., those
which receive or may receive monies from the City directly, indirectly or
contingently) operate under a four-year financial plan which the City prepares
annually and periodically updates.
The staffs of the OSDC and the Control Board issue periodic reports on
the City's financial plans, as modified, analyzing forecasts of revenues and
expenditures, cash flow, and debt service requirements, as well as compliance
with the financial plan, as modified, by the City and its Covered Organizations.
OSDC staff reports issued during the mid-1980's noted that the City's budgets
benefitted from a rapid rise in the City's economy, which boosted the City's
collection of property, business and income taxes. These resources were used to
increase the City's work force and the scope of discretionary and mandated City
services. Subsequent OSDC staff reports examined the 1987 stock market crash and
the 1989-92 recession, which affected the New York City region more severely
than the nation, and attributed an erosion of City revenues and increasing
strain on City expenditures to that recession. According to a recent OSDC staff
report, the City's economy is now slowly recovering, but the scope of that
recovery is uncertain and unlikely, in the foreseeable future, to match the
expansion of the mid-1980's. Also, staff reports of OSDC and the Control Board
have indicated that the City's recent balanced budgets have been accomplished,
in part, through the use of non-recurring resources, tax increases and
additional State assistance; that the City has not yet brought its long-term
expenditures in line with recurring revenues; and that the City is therefore
likely to continue to face future projected budget gaps requiring the City to
increase revenues and/or reduce expenditures. According to the most recent staff
reports of OSDC and the Control Board, during the four-year period covered by
the current financial plan, the City is relying on obtaining substantial
resources from initiatives needing approval and cooperation of its municipal
labor unions, Covered Organizations, and City Council, as well as the State and
federal governments, among others.
The City requires significant amounts of financing for seasonal and capital
purposes. The City's capital financing program projects long-term financing
requirements of approximately $16.1 billion for the City's fiscal years 1997
through 2000. The major capital requirements include expenditures for the City's
water supply and sewage disposal systems, roads, bridges, mass transit, schools,
hospitals and housing.
OTHER LOCALITIES
In addition to the City, certain localities, including the City of Yonkers,
could have financial problems leading to requests for additional State
assistance during the State's 1995-96 fiscal year and thereafter. Municipalities
and school districts have engaged in substantial short-term and long-term
borrowings.
From time to time, federal expenditure reductions could reduce, or in
some cases, eliminate, federal funding of some local programs, and, accordingly,
might impose substantial increased expenditure requirements on affected
localities. If the State, the City or any of the public authorities were to
suffer serious
<PAGE>
B-32
financial difficulties jeopardizing their respective access to the public credit
markets, the marketability of notes and bonds issued by localities within the
State could be adversely affected. Localities also face anticipated and
potential problems resulting from certain pending litigation, judicial decisions
and long-range economic trends. Long-range potential problems of declining urban
population, increasing expenditures and other economic trends could adversely
affect localities and require increasing State assistance in the future.
AUTHORITIES
The fiscal stability of the State is related, in part, to the fiscal
stability of its public authorities. Public authorities are not subject to the
constitutional restrictions on the incurrence of debt which apply to the State
itself and may issue bonds and notes within the amounts, and as otherwise
restricted by, their legislative authorization. As of September 30, 1994, there
were 18 public authorities that had aggregate outstanding debt of $70.3 billion.
Some authorities also receive moneys from State appropriations to pay for the
operating costs of certain of their programs.
The Metropolitan Transit Authority (the "MTA"), which receives the bulk of
the appropriated moneys from the State, oversees the operation of the City's bus
and subway system by its affiliates, the New York City Transit Authority and
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (collectively, the
"TA"). The MTA has depended and will continue to depend upon federal, state and
local government support to operate the transit system because fare revenues are
insufficient.
Over the past several years, the State has enacted several taxes (including
a surcharge on the profits of banks, insurance corporations and general business
corporations doing business in the 12-county region served by the MTA and a
special one-quarter of one percent regional sales and use tax) that provide
additional revenues for mass transit purposes, including assistance to the MTA.
In addition, a one-quarter of one percent regional mortgages recording tax paid
on certain mortgages creates an additional source of recurring revenues for the
MTA. Further, in 1993, the State dedicated a portion of the State petroleum
business tax to assist the MTA. For the 1995-96 State fiscal year, total State
assistance to the MTA is estimated at approximately $1.1 billion.
In 1993, State legislation authorized the funding of a five-year $9.56
billion MTA capital plan for the five-year period, 1992 through 1996 (the
"1992-96 Capital Program"). The MTA has received approval of the 1992-96 Capital
Program based on this legislation from the 1992-96 Capital Program Review Board,
as State law requires. This is the third five-year plan since the legislature
authorized procedures for the adoption, approval and amendment of a five-year
plan in 1981 for a capital program designed to upgrade the performance of the
MTA's transportation systems and to supplement, replace and rehabilitate
facilities and equipment. The MTA, the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
and the TA are collectively authorized to issue an aggregate of $3.1 billion of
bonds (net of certain statutory exclusions) to finance a portion of the 1992-96
Capital Program. The 1992-96 Capital Program is expected to be financed in
significant part through dedication of State petroleum business taxes referred
to above.
<PAGE>
B-33
There can be no assurance that all the necessary governmental actions for
the Capital Program will be taken, that funding sources currently identified
will not be decreased or eliminated, or that the 1992-96 Capital Program, or
parts thereof, will not be delayed or reduced. Furthermore, the power of the MTA
to issue certain bonds expected to be supported by the appropriation of State
petroleum business taxes is currently the subject of a court challenge. If the
Capital Program is delayed or reduced, ridership and fare revenues may decline,
which could, among other things, impair the MTA's ability to meet its operating
expenses without additional State assistance.
<PAGE>
B-34
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
The investment restrictions below have been adopted by the Portfolio.
Except where otherwise noted, these investment restrictions are "fundamental"
policies which, under the 1940 Act, may not be changed without the vote of a
"majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of
the Portfolio. A "majority of the outstanding voting securities" is defined in
the 1940 Act as the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the voting securities present
at a security holders meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding
voting securities are present or represented by proxy, or (b) more than 50% of
the outstanding voting securities. The percentage limitations contained in the
restrictions below apply at the time of the purchase of securities.
Unless Sections 8(b)(1) and 13(a) of the 1940 Act or any SEC or SEC
staff interpretations thereof, are amended or modified, the Portfolio may not:
1. Purchase any security if, as a result, more than 25% of the value of
the Portfolio's total assets would be invested in securities of issuers
having their principal business activities in the same industry. This
limitation shall not apply to obligations issued or guaranteed by the
U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities;
2. Borrow money, except that the Portfolio may (i) borrow money from banks
for temporary or emergency purposes (not for leveraging purposes) and
(ii) enter into reverse repurchase agreements for any purpose; provided
that (i) and (ii) in total do not exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the
Portfolio's total assets (including the amount borrowed) less
liabilities (other than borrowings). If at any time any borrowings come
to exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the Portfolio's total assets, the
Portfolio will reduce its borrowings within three business days to the
extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation;
3. Make loans to other persons, except through the purchase of debt
obligations, loans of portfolio securities, and participation in
repurchase agreements;
4. Purchase or sell physical commodities or contracts thereon, unless
acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, but
the Portfolio may purchase or sell futures contracts or options
(including options on futures contracts, but excluding options or
futures contracts on physical commodities) and may enter into foreign
currency forward contracts;
5. Purchase or sell real estate, but the Portfolio may purchase or sell
securities that are secured by real estate or issued
<PAGE>
B-35
by companies (including real estate investment trusts) that invest or
deal in real estate;
6. Underwrite securities of other issuers, except to the extent the
Portfolio, in disposing of portfolio securities, may be deemed an
underwriter within the meaning of the 1933 Act; and
7. Issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act or any
rule, order or interpretation thereunder.
NON-FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS. The investment restrictions
described below are not fundamental policies of the Portfolio and may be changed
by the Trustees. These non-fundamental investment policies require that the
Portfolio may not:
1. Acquire securities of other investment companies, except as permitted
by the 1940 Act or any rule, order or interpretation thereunder, or in
connection with a merger, consolidation, reorganization, acquisition of
assets or an offer of exchange;
2. Acquire any illiquid securities, such as repurchase agreements with
more than seven days to maturity or fixed time deposits with a duration
of over seven calendar days, if as a result thereof, more than 15% of
the market value of the Portfolio's total assets would be in
investments that are illiquid;
3. Sell any security short, unless it owns or has the right to obtain
securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold or
unless it covers such short sales as required by the current rules or
positions of the SEC or its staff. Transactions in futures contracts
and options shall not constitute selling securities short;
4. Purchase securities on margin, but the Portfolio may obtain such short
term credits as may be necessary for the clearance of transactions;
There will be no violation of any investment restriction if that
restriction is complied with at the time the relevant action is taken
notwithstanding a later change in market value of an investment, in net or total
assets, in the securities rating of the investment, or any other later change.
ITEM 14. MANAGEMENT OF THE PORTFOLIO.
The Trustees and officers of the Portfolio and their addresses and
principal occupations during the past five years are set forth below. Their
titles may have varied during that period. An asterisk indicates that a Trustee
is an "interested person" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Portfolio.
<PAGE>
B-36
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
FREDERICK S. ADDY -- Trustee; Retired; Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer from January 1990 to April 1994, Amoco Corporation;
Director, Ensearch Corp. (natural gas), since 1994. His address is 19129 RR 2147
W. Horseshoe Bay, TX 78654.
WILLIAM G. BURNS -- Trustee; Retired; Limited Partner, Galen Partners
L.P. and Vice Chairman, Galen Associates, since 1990; Chief Executive Officer,
Galen Associates and General Partner, Galen Partners L.P., until 1991. His
address is 4241 S.W. Parkgate Blvd., Palm City, FL 34990.
ARTHUR C. ESCHENLAUER -- Trustee; Retired; Senior Vice President,
Morgan Trust Company of New York until 1987. His address is 14 Alta
Vista Drive, RD #2, Princeton, NJ 08540.
MATTHEW HEALEY(*) -- Trustee; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
Chairman, Pierpont Group, Inc.; since 1989; Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Execution Services, Inc. until October 1991 . His address is Pine Tree
Club Estates, 10286 Saint Andrew Road, Boynton Beach, FL 33436.
MICHAEL P. MALLARDI -- Trustee; Retired; Senior Vice President,
Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. and President, Broadcast Group prior to April, 1996.
His address is 10 Charnwood Drive, Suffern, NY 10910.
_____________________
* Mr. Healey is an "interested person" of the Portfolio as that term in defined
in the 1940 Act.
Each Trustee is paid an annual fee as follows for serving as Trustee
of the Portfolio, The Pierpont Funds, The JPM Institutional Funds, and each
other registered investment company in which series of the Pierpont or JPM
Institutional Funds invest, and is
<PAGE>
B-37
reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with service as a Trustee. The
compensation paid to the Trustees in calendar 1995 is set forth below. The
Trustees may hold various other directorships unrelated to the Portfolio.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AGGREGATE PENSION TOTAL COMPENSATION FROM
COMPENSATION OR RETIREMENT THE PORTFOLIOS, THE
FROM THE BENEFITS ESTIMATED PIERPONT FUNDS AND THE JPM
PORTFOLIO ACCRUED AS PART ANNUAL BENEFITS INSTITUTIONAL FUND PAID
DURING 1995 OF FUND EXPENSES UPON RETIREMENTS TO TRUSTEES DURING 1995
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Frederick S. Addy, Trustee $8,727 None None $62,500
William G. Burns, Trustee $8,727 None None $62,500
Arthur C. Eschenlauer, Trustee $8,727 None None $62,500
Matthew Healey, Trustee(*),
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer $8,727 None None $62,500
Michael P. Mallardi, Trustee $8,727 None None $62,500
<FN>
(*) During 1995, Pierpont Group, Inc. paid Mr. Healey, in his role as Chairman
of Pierpont Group, Inc., compensation in the amount of $140,000, contributed
$21,000 to a defined contribution plan on his behalf and paid $20,000 in
insurance premiums for his benefit.
</FN>
</TABLE>
As of April 1, 1995 the annual fee paid to each Trustee for serving as
a Trustee of the Trust, each of the Portfolios and The Pierpont Funds was
adjusted to $65,000.
In accordance with applicable state requirements, a majority of the
disinterested Trustees have adopted written procedures reasonably appropriate to
deal with potential conflicts of interest arising from the fact that the same
individuals are Trustees of the Portfolio and The Pierpont Funds and The JPM
Institutional Funds up to and including creating a separate board of trustees.
The Trustees of the Portfolio, in addition to reviewing actions of the
Portfolio's various service providers, decide upon matters of general policy.
The Portfolio has entered into a Portfolio Fund Services Agreement with Pierpont
Group, Inc. to assist the Trustees in exercising their overall supervisory
responsibilities for the Portfolio's affairs. Pierpont Group, Inc. was organized
in July 1989 to provide services for The Pierpont Funds
<PAGE>
B-38
(currently an investor in the Portfolio). The Portfolio has agreed to pay
Pierpont Group, Inc. a fee in an amount representing its reasonable costs in
performing these services. These costs are periodically reviewed by the
Trustees. For the period April 11, 1994 (commencement of operations) through
March 31, 1995 the aggregate fees paid to Pierpont Group, Inc. were $4,140. For
the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995, the aggregate fees paid to Pierpont Group,
Inc. were $5,530. The Portfolio has no employees; its executive officers (listed
below) other than the Chief Executive Officer are provided and compensated by
Funds Distributor, Inc. ("FDI"), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Boston
Institutional Group, Inc. The Portfolio's officers conduct and supervise the
business operations of the Portfolio.
The officers of the Portfolio and their principal occupations during
the past five years are set forth below. The business address of each of the
officers unless otherwise noted is 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
MATTHEW HEALEY; Chief Executive Officer; Chairman, Pierpont Group,
Inc., since 1989; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Execution Services, Inc.
until October 1991. His address is Pine Tree Club Estates, 10286 Saint Andrews
Road, Boynton Beach, FL 33436.
ELIZABETH A. BACHMAN; Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Counsel
FDI and Premier Mutual Fund Services, Inc. ("Premier Mutual") and an officer of
RCM Capial Funds, Inc., RCM Equity Funds, Inc., Waterhouse Investors Cash
Management Fund, Inc. and certain investment companies advisoed or administered
by the Dreyfus Corporation ("Dreyfus"). Prior to September 1995, Ms. Bachman was
enrolled at Fordham University Schools of Law and received her JD in May 1995.
Prior to September 1992, Ms. Bachman was an assistant at the National
Association for Public Interest Law. Address: FDI, 200 park Avenue, New Yor, New
York 10166
MARIE E. CONNOLLY; Vice President and Assistant Treasurer. President
and Chief Executive Officer and Director of FDI, Premier Mutual and an officer
of RCM Capital Funds, Inc., RCM Equity Funds, Inc. and certain investment
companies
<PAGE>
B-39
advised or administered by Dreyfus. From December 1991 to July 1994, she was
President and Chief Compliance Officer of FDI. Prior to December 1991, she
served as Vice President and Controller, and later as Senior Vice President of
The Boston Company Advisors, Inc. ("TBCA").
DOUGLAS C. CONROY; Vice President and Assistant Treasurer. Supervisor
of Treasury Services and Administration of FDI and an officer of certain
investment companies advised or administered by Dreyfus. From April 1993 to
January 1995, Mr. Conroy was a Senior Fund Accountant for Investors Bank & Trust
Company. From December 1993 to March 1993, Mr. Conroy was employed as a fund
accountant at The Boston Company.
JACQUELINE HENNING; Assistant Secretary and Assistant Treasurer.
Managing Director, State Street Cayman Trust Company, Ltd. since October 1994.
Prior to October 1994, Mrs. Henning was head of mutual funds at Morgan Grenfell
in Cayman and for five years was Managing director of Bank of Nova Scotia Trust
Company (Cayman) Limited from September 1988 to September 1993. Address: P.O.
Box 2508 GT, Elizabethan Square, 2nd Floor, Shedden Road, George Town, Grand
Cayman, Cayman Islands.
RICHARD W. INGRAM; President and Treasurer. Senior Vice President and
Director of Client Services and Treasury Administration of FDI, Senior Vice
President of Premier Mutual and an officer of RCM Capital Funds, Inc., RCM
Equity Funds, Inc., Waterhouse Investors Cash Management Fund, Inc. and certain
investment companies advised or administered by Dreyfus. From March 1994 to
November 1995, Mr. Ingram was Vice President and Division Manager of First Data
Investor Services Group, Inc. From 1989 to 1994, Mr. Ingram was Vice President,
Assistant Treasurer and Tax Director - Mutual Funds of The Boston Company.
KAREN JACOPPO-WOOD; Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Assistant
Vice President of FDI and an officer of RCM Capital Funds, Inc. and RCM Equity
Funds, Inc. From June 1994 to January 1996, Ms. Jacoppo was a Manager, SEC
Registration, Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Inc. From 1988 to May 1994, Ms. Jacoppo
was a senior paralegal at TBCA.
CHRISTOPHER J. KELLEY; Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Vice
President and Assistant General Counsel of FDI. From April 1994 to July 1996,
Mr. Kelley was Assistant Counsel at Forum Financial Group. From 1992 to 1994,
Mr. Kelley was employed by Putnam Investments in the Global Fixed Income Group
of the Legal Department. Prior to 1992, Mr. Kelley served as a law clerk for the
firm of Murphy, DeMarco & O'Neill.
<PAGE>
B-40
LENORE J. MCCABE; Assistant Secretary and Assistant Treasurer.
Assistant Vice President, State Street Bank and Trust Company since November
1994. Assigned as Operations Manager, State Street Cayman Trust Company, Ltd.
since February 1995. Prior to November, 1994, employed by Boston Financial Data
Services, Inc. as Control Group Manager. Address: P.O. Box 2508 GT, Elizabethan
Square, 2nd Floor, Shedden Road, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.
MARY A. NELSON; Vice President and Assistant Treasurer. Vice President
and Manager of Treasury Services and Administration of FDI, an officer of RCM
Capital Funds, Inc., RCM Equity Funds, Inc. and certain investment companies
advised or administered by Dreyfus. From 1989 to 1994, Ms. Nelson as an
Assistant Vice President and client manager for The Boston Company.
JOHN E. PELLETIER; Vice President and Secretary. Senior Vice President
and General Counsel of FDI and Premier Mutual and an officer of RCM Capital
Funds, Inc., RCM Equity Funds, Inc., Waterhouse Investors Cash Management Fund,
Inc. and certain investment companies advised or administered by Dreyfus. From
February 1992 to April 1994, Mr. Pelletier served as Counsel for TBCA. From
August 1990 to February 1992, Mr. Pelletier was employed as an Associate at
Ropes & Gray.
JOSEPH F. TOWER III; Vice President and Assistant Treasurer. Senior
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of FDI and Premier Mutual
and an officer of Waterhouse Investors Cash Management Fund, Inc. and certain
investment companies advised or administered by Dreyfus. From July 1988 to
November 1993, Mr. Tower was Financial Manager of The Boston Company.
<PAGE>
B-41
The Portfolio's Declaration of Trust provides that it will indemnify
its Trustees and officers against liabilities and expenses incurred in
connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their
offices with the Portfolio, unless, as to liability to the Portfolio or its
investors, it is finally adjudicated that they engaged in wilful misfeasance,
bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in
their offices, or unless with respect to any other matter it is finally
adjudicated that they did not act in good faith in the reasonable belief that
their actions were in the best interests of the Portfolio. In the case of
settlement, such indemnification will not be provided unless it has been
determined by a court or other body approving the settlement or other
disposition, or by a reasonable determination, based upon a review of readily
available facts, by vote of a majority of disinterested Trustees or in a written
opinion of independent counsel, that such officers or Trustees have not engaged
in wilful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of
their duties.
ITEM 15. CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES.
As of July 31, 1996, The JPM Institutional New York Total Return Bond
Fund and The Pierpont New York Total Return Bond Fund (the "Funds"), series of
The JPM Institutional Funds and The Pierpont Funds, respectively, owned 53.45%
and 46.55%, respectively, of the outstanding interests in the Portfolio. So long
as each of these Funds controls the Portfolio, it may take actions without the
approval of any other investors.
Each of the Funds has informed the Portfolio that whenever it is
requested to vote on matters pertaining to the Portfolio (other than a vote by a
Fund to continue the operation of the Portfolio upon the withdrawal of another
investor in the Portfolio), it will hold a meeting of its shareholders and will
cast its vote as instructed by those shareholders.
ITEM 16. INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES.
INVESTMENT ADVISOR. The investment advisor to the Portfolio is Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York, a wholly owned subsidiary of J.P. Morgan &
Co. Incorporated ("J.P. Morgan"), a bank holding company organized under the
laws of the State of Delaware. Morgan, whose principal offices are at 60 Wall
Street, New York, New York 10260, is a New York trust company which conducts a
general banking and trust business. Morgan is subject to regulation by the New
York State Banking Department and is a
<PAGE>
B-42
member bank of the Federal Reserve System. Through offices in New York City and
abroad, Morgan offers a wide range of services, primarily to
governmental, institutional, corporate and high net worth individual customers
in the United States and throughout the world.
J.P. Morgan, through the Advisor and other subsidiaries, acts as
investment advisor to individuals, governments, corporations, employee benefit
plans, mutual funds and other institutional investors with combined assets under
management of $179 billion (of which the Advisor advises over $28 billion).
J.P. Morgan has a long history of service as adviser, underwriter and
lender to an extensive roster of major companies and as a financial advisor to
national governments. The firm, through its predecessor firms, has been in
business for over a century and has been managing investments since 1913.
The basis of Morgan's investment process is fundamental investment
research as the firm believes that fundamentals should determine an asset's
value over the long term. J.P. Morgan currently employs over 100 full time
research analysts, among the largest research staffs in the money management
industry, in its investment management divisions located in New York, London,
Tokyo, Frankfurt, Melbourne and Singapore to cover companies, industries and
countries on site. In addition, the investment management divisions employ
approximately 300 capital market researchers, portfolio managers and traders.
The Advisor's fixed income investment process is based on analysis of real
rates, sector diversification and quantitative and credit analysis.
The investment advisory services the Advisor provides to the Portfolio
are not exclusive under the terms of the Advisory Agreement. The Advisor is free
to and does render similar investment advisory services to others. The Advisor
serves as investment advisor to personal investors and other investment
companies and acts as fiduciary for trusts, estates and employee benefit plans.
Certain of the assets of trusts and estates under management are invested in
common trust funds for which the Advisor serves as trustee. The accounts which
are managed or advised by the Advisor have varying investment objectives and the
Advisor invests assets of such accounts in investments substantially similar to,
or the same as, those which are expected to constitute the principal investments
of the Portfolio. Such accounts are supervised by officers and employees of the
Advisor who may also be acting in similar capacities for the Portfolio. See Item
17 below.
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
J.P. Morgan , is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940, as amended, which manages employee benefit funds of corporations,
<PAGE>
B-43
labor unions and state and local governments and the accounts of other
institutional investors, including investment companies. Certain of the assets
of employee benefit accounts under its management are invested in commingled
pension trust funds for which the Advisor serves as trustee. J.P. Morgan
Investment Management Inc. advises the Advisor on investment of the commingled
pension trust funds.
The Portfolio is managed by officers of the Advisor who, in acting for
their customers, including the Portfolio, do not discuss their investment
decisions with any personnel of J.P. Morgan or any personnel of other divisions
of the Advisor or with any of its affiliated persons, with the exception of J.P.
Morgan Investment Management Inc., which provides securities trading and
investment research services for Morgan's investment advisory and fiduciary
accounts. See Item 17 below for a description of services provided to the
Portfolio by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
As compensation for the services rendered and related expenses such as
salaries of advisory personnel borne by the Advisor under the Investment
Advisory Agreement, the Portfolio has agreed to pay the Advisor a fee, which is
computed daily and may be paid monthly, equal to the annual rate of 0.30% of the
Portfolio's average daily net assets. For the period April 11, 1994
(commencement of operations) through March 31, 1995 the Portfolio paid Morgan
$120,281 in advisory fees. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996, the
Portfolio paid Morgan $246,966 in advisory fees.
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that it will continue in
effect for a period of two years after execution only if specifically approved
annually thereafter (i) by a vote of the holders of a majority of the
Portfolio's outstanding securities or by its Trustees and (ii) by a vote of a
majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the Advisory Agreement or
"interested persons" as defined by the 1940 Act cast in person at a meeting
called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Investment Advisory
Agreement will terminate automatically if assigned and is terminable at any time
without penalty by a vote of a majority of the Trustees of the Portfolio or by a
vote of the holders of a majority of the Portfolio's voting securities on 60
days' written notice to the Advisor and by the Advisor on 90 days' written
notice to the Portfolio.
The Glass-Steagall Act and other applicable laws generally prohibit
banks such as Morgan from engaging in the business of underwriting or
distributing securities, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System has issued an interpretation to the effect that under these laws a bank
holding company registered under the federal Bank Holding Company Act or certain
subsidiaries thereof may not sponsor, organize, or control a registered open-end
investment company continuously
<PAGE>
B-44
engaged in the issuance of its shares, such as the Portfolio. The interpretation
does not prohibit a holding company or a subsidiary thereof from acting as
investment advisor and custodian to such an investment company. Morgan believes
that it may perform the services for the Portfolio contemplated by the Advisory
Agreement without violation of the Glass-Steagall Act or other applicable
banking laws or regulations. State laws on this issue may differ from the
interpretation of relevant federal law, and banks and financial institutions may
be required to register as dealers pursuant to state securities laws. However,
it is possible that future changes in either federal or state statutes and
regulations concerning the permissible activities of banks or trust companies,
as well as further judicial or administrative decisions and interpretations of
present and future statutes and regulations, might prevent Morgan from
continuing to perform such services for the Portfolio.
If Morgan were prohibited from acting as investment advisor to the
Portfolio, it is expected that the Trustees of the Portfolio would recommend to
investors that they approve the Portfolio's entering into a new investment
advisory agreement with another qualified investment advisor selected by the
Trustees.
Morgan also receives compensation from the Portfolio in its capacity
as Services Agent to the Portfolio.
CO-ADMINISTRATOR. Under the Portfolio's Co-Administration Agreement
dated August 1, 1996, FDI serves as the Portfolio's Co-Administrator. The
Co-Administration Agreement may be renewed or amended by the Trustees without an
investor vote. The Co-Administration Agreement is terminable at any time without
penalty by a vote of a majority of the Trustees or the Portfolio on not more
than 60 days' written notice nor less than 30 days' written notice to the other
party. The Co-Administrator may subcontract for the performance of its
obligations, provided, however, that unless the Portfolios expressly agrees in
writing, the Co-Administrator shall be fully responsible for the acts and
omissions of any subcontractor as it would for its own acts or omissions. See
Services Agent below.
The following administrative fees were paid by the Portfolio to
Signature Broker-Dealer Services, Inc. (which provided placement agent and
administrative servies to the Portfolio prior to August 1, 1996): For the period
April 11, 1994 (commencement of operation) through March 31, 1995: $2,563. For
the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996: $6,648.
<PAGE>
B-45
SERVICES AGENT. The Portfolio has entered into an Administrative
Services Agreement (the "Services Agreement") with Morgan effective December 29,
1995, as amended August 1, 1996, pursuant to which Morgan is responsible for
certain administrative and related services provided to the Portfolio.
Under the amended Services Agreement and the Co-Administration
Agreement, the Portfolio has agreed to pay Morgan and FDI fees equal to its
allocable share of an annual complex-wide charge. This charge is calculated
daily based on the aggregate net assets of the Portfolio and other portfolioss
(collectively the "Masters Portfolios") in which series of the JPM Institutional
Funds, The Pierpont Funds or The JPM Advisor Funds invest in accordance with the
following annual schedule: 0.09% on the first $7 billion of the Portfolios'
aggregate average daily net assets and 0.04% of the Master Portfolios' average
daily net assets in excess of $7 billion.
Under Administrative Services Agreements in effect from December 29,
1995 through July 31, 1996, with Morgan, the Portfolio paid Morgan a fee equal
to its proportionate share of an annual complex-wide charge. This charge was
calculated daily based on the aggregate net assets of the Master Portfolios in
accordance with the following schedule: 0.06% of the first $7 billion of the
Master Portfolios' aggregate average daily net assets, and 0.03% of the Master
Portfolios' average daily net assets in excess of $7 billion. Prior to December
29, 1995, the Portfolio had entered into a Financial and Fund Accounting
Services Agreement with Morgan, the provisions of which included certain of the
activities described above and, prior to September 1, 1995, also included
reimbursement of usual and customary expenses. For the period April 11, 1994
(commencement of operation) through March 31, 1995, the Portfolio was reimbursed
$11,830 by Morgan for expenses in excess of its fees paid under the Services
Agreement. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996, the Portfolio paid Morgan
$7,691 in administrative services fees.
<PAGE>
B-46
CUSTODIAN. State Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street"), 225
Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02101, serves as the Portfolio's
Custodian and Transfer Agent. Pursuant to the Custodian Contract, State Street
is responsible for maintaining the books of account and records of portfolio
transactions and holding portfolio securities and cash. In addition, the
Custodian has entered into subcustodian agreements with Bankers Trust Company
for the purpose of holding TENR Notes and with Bank of New York and Chemical
Bank, N.A. for the purpose of holding certain variable rate demand notes. In the
case of foreign assets held outside the United States, the Custodian employs
various subcustodians who were approved by the Trustees of the Portfolio in
accordance with the regulations of the SEC. The Custodian maintains portfolio
transaction records.
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS. The independent accountants of the Portfolio
are Price Waterhouse LLP, 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036.
Price Waterhouse LLP conducts an annual audit of the financial statements of the
Portfolio, assists in the preparation and/or review of each of the Portfolio's
federal and state income tax returns and consults with the Portfolio as to
matters of accounting and federal and state income taxation.
ITEM 17. BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES.
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., acting as agent for Morgan
Guaranty, places orders for the Portfolio for all purchases and sales of
portfolio securities. Morgan enters into repurchase agreements and
reverse repurchase agreements for the Portfolio and executes loans of portfolio
securities on behalf of the Portfolio. See Item 13 above.
Fixed income and debt securities and municipal bonds and notes are
generally traded at a net price with dealers acting as principal for their own
accounts without a stated commission. The price of the security usually includes
profit to the dealers. In underwritten offerings, securities are purchased at a
fixed price which includes an amount of compensation to the underwriter,
generally referred to as the underwriter's concession or discount. On occasion,
certain securities may be purchased directly from an issuer, in which case no
commissions or discounts are paid.
Portfolio transactions for the Portfolio will be undertaken principally
to accomplish the Portfolio's objective in relation to expected movements in the
general level of interest rates. The Portfolio may engage in short term trading
consistent with its objective. The Portfolio expects its annual portfolio
turnover rates will be less than 100%. In connection with portfolio transactions
for the Portfolio, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. intends to seek best
price and execution on a competitive basis for both purchases and sales of
securities.
For the period April 11, 1994 (commencement of operations) through
March 31, 1995 the Portfolio's portfolio turnover rate was 63%. For the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1996, the Portfolio's portfolio turnover rate wase 41%. A
rate of 100% indicates that the equivalent of all of the Portfolio's assets have
been sold and reinvested in a year. High portfolio turnover may result in the
realization of substantial net capital gains or losses.
Subject to the overriding objective of obtaining the best
<PAGE>
B-47
possible execution of orders, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., or Morgan
Guaranty as the case may be, may allocate a portion of the Portfolio's portfolio
brokerage transactions to affiliates of Morgan. In order for affiliates of
Morgan to effect any portfolio transactions for the Portfolio, the commissions,
fees or other remuneration received by such affiliates must be reasonable and
fair compared to the commissions, fees, or other remuneration paid to other
brokers in connection with comparable transactions involving similar securities
being purchased or sold on a securities exchange during a comparable period of
time. Furthermore, the Trustees of the Portfolio, including a majority of the
Trustees who are not "interested persons," have adopted procedures which are
reasonably designed to provide that any commissions, fees, or other remuneration
paid to such affiliates are consistent with the foregoing standard.
The Portfolio's portfolio securities will not be purchased from or
through or sold to or through the Portfolio's Administrator, Exclusive Placement
Agent or Advisor or any "affiliated person" as defined in the 1940 Act, of the
Administrator, Exclusive Placement Agent or Advisor when such entities are
acting as principals, except to the extent permitted by law. In addition, the
Portfolio will not purchase securities during the existence of any underwriting
group relating thereto of which the Advisor or an affiliate of the Advisor is a
member, except to the extent permitted by law.
On those occasions when Morgan deems the purchase or sale of a security to be in
the best interests of the Portfolio as well as other investors, J.P. Morgan
Investment Management Inc., to the extent permitted by applicable laws and
regulations, may, but is not obligated to, aggregate the securities to be sold
or purchased for the Portfolio with those to be sold or purchased for other
customers in order to obtain best execution, including lower brokerage
commissions if appropriate. In such event, allocation of the securities so
purchased or sold as well as any expenses incurred in the transaction will be
made by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., or Morgan Guaranty as the case
may be, in the manner it considers to be most equitable and consistent with
Morgan's fiduciary obligations to the Portfolio. In some instances, this
procedure might adversely affect the Portfolio.
If the Portfolio effects a closing purchase transaction with respect to
an option written by it, normally such transaction will be executed by the same
broker-dealer who executed the sale of the option. The writing of options by the
Portfolio will be subject to limitations established by each of the exchanges
governing the maximum number of options in each class which may be written by a
single investor or group of investors acting in concert, regardless of whether
the options are written on the same or different exchanges or are held or
written in one or more accounts or through one or more brokers. The number of
options
<PAGE>
B-48
which the Portfolio may write may be affected by options written by the Advisor
for other investment advisory clients. An exchange may order the liquidation of
positions found to be in excess of these limits, and it may impose certain other
sanctions.
ITEM 18. CAPITAL STOCK AND OTHER SECURITIES.
Under the Declaration of Trust, the Trustees are authorized to issue
beneficial interests in the Portfolio. Investors are entitled to participate pro
rata in distributions of taxable income, loss, gain and credit of the Portfolio.
Upon liquidation or dissolution of the Portfolio, investors are entitled to
share pro rata in the Portfolio's net assets available for distribution to its
investors. Investments in the Portfolio have no preference, preemptive,
conversion or similar rights and are fully paid and nonassessable, except as set
forth below. Investments in the Portfolio may not be transferred. Certificates
representing an investor's beneficial interest in the Portfolio are issued only
upon the written request of an investor.
Each investor is entitled to a vote in proportion to the amount of its
investment in the Portfolio. Investors in the Portfolio do not have cumulative
voting rights, and investors holding more than 50% of the aggregate beneficial
interest in the Portfolio may elect all of the Trustees if they choose to do so
and in such event the other investors in the Portfolio would not be able to
elect any Trustee. The Portfolio is not required and has no current intention to
hold annual meetings of investors but the Portfolio will hold special meetings
of investors when in the judgment of the Portfolio's Trustees it is necessary or
desirable to submit matters for an investor vote. No material amendment may be
made to the Portfolio's Declaration of Trust without the affirmative majority
vote of investors (with the vote of each being in proportion to the amount of
its investment).
The Portfolio may enter into a merger or consolidation, or sell all or
substantially all of its assets, if approved by the vote of two thirds of its
investors (with the vote of each being in proportion to its percentage of the
beneficial interests in the Portfolio), except that if the Trustees recommend
such sale of assets, the approval by vote of a majority of the investors (with
the vote of each being in proportion to its percentage of the beneficial
interests of the Portfolio) will be sufficient. The Portfolio may also be
terminated (i) upon liquidation and distribution of its assets if approved by
the vote of two thirds of its investors (with the vote of each being in
proportion to the amount of its investment) or (ii) by the Trustees by written
notice to its investors.
The Portfolio is organized as a trust under the laws of the State of
New York. Investors in the Portfolio will be held personally liable for its
obligations and liabilities, subject,
<PAGE>
B-49
however, to indemnification by the Portfolio in the event that there is imposed
upon an investor a greater portion of the liabilities and obligations of the
Portfolio than its proportionate beneficial interest in the Portfolio. The
Declaration of Trust also provides that the Portfolio shall maintain appropriate
insurance (for example, fidelity bonding and errors and omissions insurance) for
the protection of the Portfolio, its investors, Trustees, officers, employees
and agents covering possible tort and other liabilities. Thus, the risk of an
investor incurring financial loss on account of investor liability is limited to
circumstances in which both inadequate insurance existed and the Portfolio
itself was unable to meet its obligations.
The Portfolio's Declaration of Trust further provides that obligations
of the Portfolio are not binding upon the Trustees individually but only upon
the property of the Portfolio and that the Trustees will not be liable for any
action or failure to act, but nothing in the Declaration of Trust protects a
Trustee against any liability to which he would otherwise be subject by reason
of wilful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the
duties involved in the conduct of his office.
ITEM 19. PURCHASE, REDEMPTION AND PRICING OF SECURITIES.
Beneficial interests in the Portfolio are issued solely in private
placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the
meaning of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.
Portfolio securities with a maturity of 60 days or more, including
securities that are listed on an exchange or traded over the counter, are valued
using prices supplied daily by an independent pricing service or services that
(i) are based on the last sale price on a national securities exchange or, in
the absence of recorded sales, at the readily available closing bid price on
such exchange or at the quoted bid price in the over-the-counter market, if such
exchange or market constitutes the broadest and most representative market for
the security and (ii) in other cases, take into account various factors
affecting market value, including yields and prices of comparable securities,
indication as to value from dealers and general market conditions. If such
prices are not supplied by the Portfolio's independent pricing service, such
securities are priced in accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees. All
portfolio securities with a remaining maturity of less than 60 days are valued
by the amortized cost method. Securities listed on a foreign exchange are valued
at the last quoted sale price available before the time when net assets are
valued. Because of the large number of municipal bond issues outstanding and the
varying maturity dates, coupons and risk factors applicable to each issuer's
books, no readily available market quotations exist for most municipal
securities.
If the Portfolio determines that it would be detrimental to
<PAGE>
B-50
the best interest of the remaining investors in the Portfolio to make payment
wholly or partly in cash, payment of the redemption price may be made in whole
or in part by a distribution in kind of securities from the Portfolio, in lieu
of cash, in conformity with the applicable rule of the SEC. If interests are
redeemed in kind, the redeeming investor might incur transaction costs in
converting the assets into cash. The method of valuing portfolio securities is
described above and such valuation will be made as of the same time the
redemption price is determined. The Portfolio has elected to be governed by Rule
18f-1 under the 1940 Act pursuant to which the Portfolio is obligated to redeem
interests solely in cash up to the lesser of $250,000 or 1% of the net asset
value of the Portfolio during any 90 day period for any one investor. The
Portfolio will not redeem in kind except in circumstances in which an investor
is permitted to redeem in kind.
ITEM 20. TAX STATUS.
The Portfolio is organized as a New York trust. The Portfolio is not
subject to any income or franchise tax in the State of New York or the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. However each investor in the Portfolio will be
taxable on its share (as determined in accordance with the governing instruments
of the Portfolio) of the Portfolio's ordinary income and capital gain in
determining its income tax liability. The determination of such share will be
made in accordance with the Code, and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Although, as described above, the Portfolio will not be subject to
federal income tax, it will file appropriate income tax returns.
It is intended that the Portfolio's assets will be managed in such a
way that an investor in the Portfolio will be able to satisfy the requirements
of Subchapter M of the Code.
The Portfolio intends to qualify to allocate tax exempt interest to its
investors by having, at the close of each quarter of its taxable year, at least
50% of the value of its total assets consist of tax exempt securities. Tax
exempt interest is that part of income earned by the Portfolio which consists of
interest received by the Portfolio on tax exempt securities. In view of the
Portfolio's investment policies, it is expected that a substantial portion of
all income will be tax exempt income, although the Portfolio may from time to
time realize net short-term capital gains and may invest limited amounts in
taxable securities under certain circumstances.
Gains or losses on sales of portfolio securities will be treated as
long-term capital gains or losses if the securities have been held for more than
one year except in certain cases where, if applicable, a put is acquired or a
call option is written thereon.
<PAGE>
B-51
Other gains or losses on the sale of securities will be short-term capital gains
or losses. Gains and losses on the sale, lapse or other termination of options
on securities will be treated as gains and losses from the sale of securities.
If an option written by the Portfolio lapses or is terminated through a closing
transaction, such as a repurchase by the Portfolio of the option from its
holder, the Portfolio will realize a short-term capital gain or loss, depending
on whether the premium income is greater or less than the amount paid by the
Portfolio in the closing transaction. If securities are purchased by the
Portfolio pursuant to the exercise of a put option written by it, the Portfolio
will subtract the premium received from its cost basis in the securities
purchased.
Forward currency contracts, options and futures contracts entered into
by the Portfolio may create "straddles" for U.S. federal income tax purposes and
this may affect the character and timing of gains or losses realized by the
Portfolio on forward currency contracts, options and futures contracts or on the
underlying securities. Straddles may also result in the loss of the holding
period of underlying securities for purposes of the 30% of gross income test
described above, and therefore, the Portfolio's ability to enter into forward
currency contracts, options and futures contracts may be limited.
Certain options, futures and foreign currency contracts held by a
Portfolio at the end of each fiscal year will be required to be "marked to
market" for federal income tax purposes--i.e., treated as having been sold at
market value. For options and futures contracts, 60% of any gain or loss
recognized on these deemed sales and on actual dispositions will be treated as
long-term capital gain or loss, and the remainder will be treated as short-term
capital gain or loss regardless of how long the Portfolio has held such options
or futures. Any gain or loss recognized on foreign currency contracts will be
treated as ordinary income.
FOREIGN INVESTORS. Allocations of U.S. source dividend income to an
investor who, as to the United States, is a foreign trust, foreign corporation
or other foreign investor will be subject to United States withholding tax at
the rate of 30% (or lower treaty rate). Allocations of Portfolio interest or
short term or net long term capital gains to foreign investors will not be
subject to United States tax.
STATE AND LOCAL TAXES. The Portfolio may be subject to state or local
taxes in jurisdictions in which the Portfolio is deemed to be doing business. In
addition, the treatment of the Portfolio and its investors in those states which
have income tax laws might differ from treatment under the federal income tax
laws. Investors should consult their own tax advisors with respect to any state
or local taxes.
FOREIGN TAXES. The Portfolio may be subject to foreign
<PAGE>
B-52
withholding taxes with respect to income received from sources within foreign
countries.
OTHER TAXATION. The investment by an investor in the Portfolio does not
cause the investor to be liable for any income or franchise tax in the State of
New York. Investors are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect
to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in the Portfolio.
ITEM 21. UNDERWRITERS.
The exclusive placement agent for the Portfolio is SBDS, which receives
no additional compensation for serving in this capacity. Other investment
companies, insurance company separate accounts, common and commingled trust
funds and similar organizations and entities may continuously invest in the
Portfolio.
ITEM 22. CALCULATIONS OF PERFORMANCE DATA.
Not applicable.
ITEM 23. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
The Portfolio's current report to investors filed with the SEC
pursuant to Section 30(b) of the 1940 Act and Rule 30b2-1 thereunder is
incorporated herein by reference.
<PAGE>
B-53
APPENDIX A
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITY RATINGS
STANDARD & POOR'S
CORPORATE AND MUNICIPAL BONDS
AAA - Debt rated AAA have the highest ratings assigned by Standard &
Poor's to a debt obligation. Capacity to pay interest and repay
principal is extremely strong.
AA - Debt rated AA have a very strong capacity to pay interest and
repay principal and differ from the highest rated issues only in
a small degree.
A - Debt rated A have a strong capacity to pay interest and repay
principal although they are somewhat more
<PAGE>
B-54
susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances
and economic conditions than debts in higher rated categories.
BBB - Debt rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to
pay interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit
adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or
changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened
capacity to pay interest and repay principal for debts in this
category than for debts in higher rated categories.
BB - Debt rated BB is regarded as having less near-term
vulnerability to default than other speculative issues. However,
it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse
business, financial or economic conditions which could lead to
inadequate capacity to meet timely interest and principal
payments.
COMMERCIAL PAPER, INCLUDING TAX EXEMPT
A - Issues assigned this highest rating are regarded as having the
greatest capacity for timely payment. Issues in this category are
further refined with the designations 1, 2, and 3 to indicate the
relative degree of safety.
A-1 - This designation indicates that the degree of safety regarding
timely payment is very strong.
SHORT-TERM TAX-EXEMPT NOTES
SP-1 - The short-term tax-exempt note rating of SP-1 is the highest
rating assigned by Standard & Poor's and has a very strong or
strong capacity to pay principal and interest. Those issues
determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are
given a "plus" (+) designation.
SP-2 - The short-term tax-exempt note rating of SP-2 has a
satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest.
MOODY'S
CORPORATE AND MUNICIPAL BONDS
Aaa - Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality.
They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are
generally referred to as "gilt edge". Interest payments are
protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and
principal is secure. While the various protective elements are
likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most
unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such
issues.
<PAGE>
B-55
Aa - Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by
all standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are
generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than
the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large
as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be
of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which
make the long term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa
securities.
A - Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment
attributes and are to be considered as upper medium grade
obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest
are considered adequate but elements may be present which suggest
a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future.
Baa - Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade
obligations, i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly
secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate
for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or
may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of
time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and
in fact have speculative characteristics as well.
Ba - Bonds which are rated Ba are judged to have speculative
elements; their future cannot be considered as well-assured.
Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be
very moderate, and thereby not well safeguarded during both good
and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position
characterizes bonds in this class.
COMMERCIAL PAPER, INCLUDING TAX EXEMPT
Prime-1 - Issuers rated Prime-1 (or related supporting institutions)
have a superior capacity for repayment of short-term
promissory obligations. Prime-1 repayment capacity will
normally be evidenced by the following characteristics:
- Leading market positions in well established industries.
- High rates of return on funds employed.
- Conservative capitalization structures with moderate
reliance on debt and ample asset protection.
- Broad margins in earnings coverage of fixed financial
charges and high internal cash generation.
- Well established access to a range of financial markets
and assured sources of alternate liquidity.
<PAGE>
B-56
SHORT-TERM TAX EXEMPT NOTES
MIG-1 - The short-term tax-exempt note rating MIG-1 is the highest
rating assigned by Moody's for notes judged to be the best
quality. Notes with this rating enjoy strong protection from
established cash flows of funds for their servicing or from
established and broad-based access to the market for refinancing,
or both.
MIG-2 - MIG-2 rated notes are of high quality but with margins of
protection not as large as MIG-1.
<PAGE>
JPM613
PART C
ITEM 24. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
(A) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The financial statements included in Part B, Item 23 of this
Registration Statement are as follows:
Schedule of Investments as March 31, 1996
Statement of Assets and Liabilities at March 31, 1996
Statement of Operations for the period ended March 31, 1996
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Supplementary Data
Notes to Financial Statements at March 31, 1996
(B) EXHIBITS
1 Declaration of Trust of the Registrant.1
2 By-Laws of the Registrant.1
5 Investment Advisory Agreement between the Registrant
and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York
("Morgan").1
8 Custodian Contract between the Registrant and State
Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street").2
9(a) Co-Administration Agreement between the Registrant
and Funds Distributor, Inc.3
9(b) Transfer Agency and Service Agreement between the
Registrant and State Street.1
<PAGE>
C-2
9(c) Restated Administrative Services Agreement
between the Registrant and Morgan.3
9(d) Fund Services Agreement, as amended, between the
Registrant and Pierpont Group, Inc.3
13 Investment representation letters of initial
investors.2
1 Incorporated herein by reference from Amendment no. 1 to the
Registrant's registration statement on Form N-1A (File no.
811-8462) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on July 31, 1995.
2 Incorporated herein by reference from the Registrant's
registration statement on Form N-1A (File no. 811-8462) as
filed initially with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 1, 1994.
3 Filed herewith.
ITEM 25. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL WITH REGISTRANT.
Not applicable.
ITEM 26. NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF SECURITIES.
TITLE OF CLASS: Beneficial Interests
NUMBER OF RECORD HOLDERS : 2 (as of July 31, 1996)
ITEM 27. INDEMNIFICATION.
Reference is hereby made to Article V of the Registrant's Declaration
of Trust, filed as an Exhibit hereto.
The Trustees and officers of the Registrant and the personnel of the
Registrant's co-administrator are insured under an errors and omissions
liability insurance policy. The Registrant and its officers are also insured
under the fidelity bond required by Rule 17g-1 under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended.
<PAGE>
C-3
ITEM 28. BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISER.
Morgan is a New York trust company which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated. Morgan conducts a general
banking and trust business.
To the knowledge of the Registrant, none of the directors, except those
set forth below, or executive officers of Morgan is or has been during the past
two fiscal years engaged in any other business, profession, vocation or
employment of a substantial nature, except that certain officers and directors
of Morgan also hold various positions with, and engage in business for, J.P.
Morgan & Co. Incorporated, which owns all the outstanding stock of Morgan. Set
forth below are the names, addresses, and principal business of each director of
Morgan who is engaged in another business, profession, vocation or employment of
a substantial nature.
Riley P. Bechtel: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Bechtel Group,
Inc. (architectural design and construction). His address is Bechtel Group,
Inc., P.O. Box 193965, San Francisco, CA 94119-3965.
Martin Feldstein: President and Chief Executive Officer, National
Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.(national research institution). His address is
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 1050 Massachusetts Avenue,
Cambridge, MA 02138-5398.
Hanna H. Gray: President Emeritus, The University of Chicago (academic
institution). Her address is Department of History, The University of Chicago,
1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637.
James R. Houghton: Retired Chairman, Corning Incorporated (glass
products). His address is R.D.#2 Spencer Hill Road, Corning, NY 14830.
James L. Ketelsen: Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Tenneco Inc. (oil, pipe-lines, and manufacturing). His address is Tenneco, Inc.,
P.O. Box 2511, Houston, TX 77252-2511.
William S. Lee: Chairman Emeritis, Duke Power Company (utility). His
address is Duke Power Company, 526 South Church Street, ECI2P, Charlotte, NC
28242.
Lee R. Raymond: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Exxon Corporation
(oil, natural gas, and other petroleum products). His address is Exxon
Corporation, 5959 Las Colinas Boulevard, Irving, TX 75039-2298.
<PAGE>
C-4
Richard D. Simmons: Former President, The Wasington Post Company and
International Herald Tribune (newspapers). His address is P.O. Box 242,
Sperryville, VA 22740.
Douglas C. Yearley: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Phelps Dodge Corporation (chemicals). His address is Phelps Dodge Corporation,
2600 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004-3014.
ITEM 29. PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 30. LOCATION OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS.
The accounts and records of the Registrant are located, in whole or in
part, at the office of the Registrant and the following locations:
Pierpont Group, Inc., 461 Fifth Avenue , New York, New York 10017.
(records relating to its assisting the Trustees in carrying out their duties in
supervising the Reistrant's affairs).
Morgan Trust Company of New York, 60 Wall Street, New York, NY
10260-0060 or 522 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10036. (records relating to its
functions as investment adviser and administrative services agent).
State Street Bank and Trust Company, 225 Franklin Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109 (records relating to its functions as custodian and transfer
agent).
Funds Distributor, Inc., 60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109. (records
relating to its functions as co-administrator and exclusive placement agent)
<PAGE>
C-5
ITEM 31. MANAGEMENT SERVICES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 32. UNDERTAKINGS.
Not applicable.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form N-1A
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized, in the
City of Boston and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 1st day of August,
1996.
THE NEW YORK TOTAL RETURN BOND PORTFOLIO
By /s/THOMAS M. LENZ
________________________________
Thomas M. Lenz
Assistant Secretary
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
- ----------- ----------------------
EX-99.B9(a) Co-Administration Agreement
EX-99.B9(b) Restated Administrative Services Agreement
EX-99.B9(c) Amended Fund Services Agreement
PORTFOLIOS LISTED IN EXHIBIT I
CO-ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT
CO-ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT, dated as of August 1, 1996 by and between
each of the Portfolios listed on Exhibit I, each a New York trust (a
"Portfolio"), and Funds Distributor, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the
"Co-Administrator").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, each Portfolio is engaged in business as an open-end investment
company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (collectively with
the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the "1940 Act");
WHEREAS, each Portfolio wishes to engage the Co-Administrator to provide
certain administrative and management services, and the Co-Administrator is
willing to provide such administrative and management services to the Portfolio,
on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
of the parties hereto as herein set forth, the parties covenant and agree as
follows:
1. DUTIES OF CO-ADMINISTRATOR FOR EACH PORTFOLIO. Subject to the general
direction and control of the Board of Trustees of the Portfolio, the
Co-Administrator shall perform the following administrative and management
services: (a) providing or obtaining office space, equipment and clerical
personnel necessary for maintaining the organization of the Portfolio and for
performing the administrative and management functions herein set forth; (b)
arranging for Directors, officers and employees of the Co-Administrator or its
agents, reasonably acceptable to the Trustees, to serve as Trustees, officers or
agents of the Portfolio and perform the duties incident to their office if duly
elected or appointed to such positions and subject to their individual consent
and to any limitations imposed by law; (c) filing documents with regulatory
authorities or mailing documents to investors in or Trustees of the Portfolio to
the extent requested by the Portfolio; (d) maintaining books and records of the
Portfolio related to the foregoing. In the performance of its duties under this
Agreement, the Co-Administrator will comply with the provisions of the
Declaration of Trust and By-Laws of the Portfolio and the Portfolio's stated
investment objective, policies and restrictions, and will use its best efforts
to safeguard and promote the welfare of the Portfolio, and to comply with other
policies which the Board of Trustees may from time to time determine.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Co- Administrator shall not be deemed to have
assumed any duties not specified in this Agreement, including, without
limitation, any responsibility for the management of the Portfolio's assets or
the rendering of investment advice and supervision with respect thereto, nor
shall the Co-
1
<PAGE>
Administrator be deemed to have assumed or have any responsibility with respect
to functions specifically assumed by any transfer agent, custodian or other
administrative service provider of the Portfolio. The Co-Administrator
undertakes to comply with all applicable requirements of the U.S. federal
securities laws and any other laws, rules and regulations of governmental
authorities having jurisdiction with respect to the duties to be performed by it
hereunder. Where the Portfolio's address is outside the United States as
indicated on Exhibit 1, the Co- Administrator further undertakes to perform its
duties, or cause its duties to be performed, outside of the United States, as
requested by the Trustees.
2. BOOKS AND RECORDS. In compliance with the requirements of Rule 31a-3
under the 1940 Act, the Co-Administrator hereby agrees that all records which it
maintains for a Portfolio are the property of the Portfolio and further agrees
to surrender promptly to the Portfolio any such records upon the Portfolio's
request.
3. ALLOCATION OF CHARGES AND EXPENSES. The Co-Administrator shall pay
the entire salaries and wages of all of the Portfolio's Trustees, officers and
agents who devote part or all of their time to the affairs of the
Co-Administrator or its affiliates, and the wages and salaries of such persons
shall not be deemed to be expenses incurred by the Portfolio for purposes of
this Section 3. Except as provided in the foregoing sentence, the
Co-Administrator shall not pay other expenses relating to the Portfolio
including, without limitation, compensation of Trustees not affiliated with the
Co-Administrator; governmental fees; interest charges; taxes; membership dues in
the Investment Company Institute allocable to the Portfolio; fees and expenses
of the Portfolio's independent auditors, of legal counsel and of any transfer
agent or registrar of the Portfolio; expenses of preparing, printing and mailing
reports, notices, proxy statements and reports to investors and government
officers and commissions; expenses of preparing and mailing agendas and
supporting documents for meetings of Trustees and committees of Trustees;
expenses connected with the execution, recording and settlement of security
transactions; insurance premiums; fees and expenses of the Portfolio's custodian
for all services to the Portfolio, including safekeeping of funds and securities
and maintaining required books and accounts; expenses of calculating the net
asset value of the Portfolio; expenses of meetings of investors in the
Portfolio; and expenses relating to the issuance, registration and qualification
of interests in the Portfolio.
4. COMPENSATION OF CO-ADMINISTRATOR. For the services to be rendered and
the facilities to be provided by the Co-Administrator hereunder, the
Co-Administrator will receive a fee from each Portfolio as agreed by the
Co-Administrator and the Portfolio from time to time as set forth on Schedule A
attached hereto. This fee will be payable as agreed by the Portfolio and the
Co-Administrator, but not more frequently than monthly.
5. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF THE CO-ADMINISTRATOR. The Co-Administrator
shall not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any act
or omission in the administration or management of any Portfolio or the
performance of its duties hereunder, except for wilful misfeasance, bad faith or
gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of the reckless
disregard of its obligations and duties hereunder. As used in this Section
2
<PAGE>
5, the term "Co-Administrator" shall include Funds Distributor, Inc. and/or any
of its affiliates and the Directors, officers and employees of Funds
Distributor, Inc. and/or of its affiliates.
6. ACTIVITIES OF THE CO-ADMINISTRATOR. The services of the
Co-Administrator to the Portfolios are not to be deemed to be exclusive, the
Co-Administrator being free to render administrative and/or other services to
other parties. It is understood that Trustees, officers, and investors of a
Portfolio are or may become interested in the Co-Administrator and/or any of its
affiliates as Directors, officers, employees, or otherwise, and that Directors,
officers and employees of the Co-Administrator and/or any of its affiliates are
or may become similarly interested in the Portfolio and that the
Co-Administrator and/or any of its affiliates may be or become interested in the
Portfolio as an investor or otherwise.
7. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated at any time with
respect to a Portfolio, without the payment of any penalty, by the Board of
Trustees of the Portfolio or by the Co-Administrator, in each case on not more
than 60 days' nor less than 30 days' written notice to the other party.
8. SUBCONTRACTING BY THE CO-ADMINISTRATOR. The Co-Administrator may
subcontract for the performance of its obligations hereunder with any one or
more persons; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, [THAT THE CO-ADMINISTRATOR SHALL NOT ENTER INTO
ANY SUCH SUBCONTRACT UNLESS THE TRUSTEES OF THE PORTFOLIO SHALL HAVE APPROVED
SUCH SUBCONTRACT AND FOUND THE SUBCONTRACTING PARTY TO BE QUALIFIED TO PERFORM
THE OBLIGATIONS SOUGHT TO BE SUBCONTRACTING; AND PROVIDED, FURTHER,] that,
unless the Portfolio otherwise expressly agrees in writing, the Co-
Administrator shall be as fully responsible to the Portfolio for the acts and
omissions of any subcontractor as it would be for its own acts or omissions.
[ALTERNATIVE: CO-ADMINISTRATOR SHALL HAVE GIVEN PRIOR NOTICE TO THE TRUSTEES.]
9. FURTHER ACTIONS. Each party agrees to perform such further acts and
execute such further documents as are necessary to effectuate the purposes
hereof.
10. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written
consent.
11. CONFIDENTIALITY. The Co-Administrator agrees on behalf of itself and
its employees to treat confidentially and as proprietary information of each
Portfolio all records and other information not otherwise publicly available
relative to the Portfolio and its prior, present or potential investors and not
to use such records and information for any purpose other than performance of
its responsibilities and duties hereunder, except after prior notification to
and approval in writing by the Portfolio, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld and may not be withheld where the Co-Administrator may be
exposed to civil or criminal contempt proceedings for failure to comply, when
requested to divulge such information by duly constituted authorities, or when
so requested by the Portfolio.
12. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and
understanding between the parties hereto and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings relating to
3
<PAGE>
the subject matter hereof. The captions in this Agreement are included for
convenience of reference only and in no way define or delimit any of the
provisions hereof or otherwise affect their construction or effect. Should any
part of this Agreement be held or made invalid by a court decision, statute,
rule or otherwise, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected
thereby. This Agreement shall be binding and shall inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors, to the extent permitted by law.
13. NOTICE. Any notice or other communication required to be given
pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed duly given if delivered or mailed by
registered mail, postage prepaid, (1) to the Co-Administrator at 60 State
Street, 13th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, Attention: President with a
copy to General Counsel; or (2) to the Portfolio at the Portfolio's address
listed on Exhibit I, Attention: Treasurer, or at such other address as either
party may from time to time specify to the other party pursuant to this section,
with a copy to Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, 522 Fifth Avenue, New
York, New York 10036, Attention: Funds Management.
14. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed and delivered in their names and on their behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, all as of the day and year first above written. The
undersigned officer of each Portfolio has executed this Agreement not
individually, but as an officer of the Portfolio under the Portfolio's
Declaration of Trust, dated as set forth on Exhibit I, and the obligations of
this Agreement are not binding upon any of the Trustees or investors of the
Portfolio individually, but bind only the trust estate.
EACH PORTFOLIO LISTED ON EXHIBIT I
By
Name:
Title:
FUNDS DISTRIBUTOR, INC.
By
Name:
Title:
JPM624
4
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE A
The Co-Administrator's annual fee charged to and payable by each Covered
Entity as defined below is its share of an annual complex-wide charge. The
annual complex-wide charge is:
(a) $425,000 for all Covered Entities, PROVIDED that such charge shall be
increased by $5,000 for each Covered Entity in excess of 100, plus
(b) out-of-pocket charges for any services subcontracted pursuant to
co-administration agreements with Covered Entities.
The portion of this charge payable by each Covered Entity is (i) in the case of
any charges described in paragraph (b) directly attributable to a particular
Covered Entity, the amount attributable to such Covered Entity, plus (ii) in the
case of all other amounts, the amount determined by the proportionate share that
such Covered Entity's net assets bear to the total net assets of the Covered
Entities.
A Covered Entity is any series of The Pierpont Funds, The JPM Institutional
Funds, The JPM Advisor Funds, the Portfolios in which they invest, and each
other current or future mutual fund (or series thereof) for which both (1) a tax
return is filed with the Internal Revenue Service under United States tax law
and (2) Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York provides investment advice
and/or administrative services and the Co-Administrator provides administration
services.
Approved: July 11, 1996
Effective August 1, 1996
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT I
<S> <C> <C> <C>
DATE OF DECLARATION EFFECTIVE DATE
PORTFOLIO OF TRUST ADDRESS
The Treasury Money Market Portfolio.............. 11/4/92 60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 8/1/96
The Money Market Portfolio....................... 1/29/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Tax Exempt Money Market Portfolio............ 1/29/93 60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 8/1/96
The Short Term Bond Portfolio.................... 1/29/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The U.S. Fixed Income Portfolio.................. 1/29/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Tax Exempt Bond Portfolio.................... 1/29/93 60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 8/1/96
The Selected U.S. Equity Portfolio............... 1/29/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The U.S. Small Company Portfolio................. 1/29/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Non-U.S. Equity Portfolio.................... 1/29/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Diversified Portfolio........................ 1/29/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Non-U.S. Fixed Income Portfolio.............. 6/16/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio............ 6/16/93 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The New York Total Return Bond Portfolio......... 6/16/93 60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 8/1/96
The Series Portfolio--The Asia Growth Portfolio*. 6/24/94 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Series Portfolio--The Japan Equity Portfolio* 6/24/94 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
The Series Portfolio--The European Equity Portfolio* 6/24/94 P.O. Box 2508 GT 8/1/96
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, BWI
</TABLE>
*In the case of The Series Portfolio, references to the "Portfolio" refer to its
individual series as the context requires.
PORTFOLIOS LISTED ON EXHIBIT I
RESTATED ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
RESTATED ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT, dated as of August 1, 1996,
by and between each of the Portfolios listed on Exhibit I, each a New York trust
(a "Portfolio"), and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, a New York trust
company ("Morgan").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, each Portfolio is engaged in business as an open-end investment
company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (collectively with
the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the "1940 Act");
WHEREAS, each Portfolio wishes to engage Morgan to provide certain
administrative services for the Portfolio, and Morgan is willing to provide such
services for the Portfolio, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
of the parties hereto as herein set forth, the parties covenant and agree as
follows:
1. DUTIES OF MORGAN. Subject to the general direction and control of the
Board of Trustees of the Portfolio, Morgan shall perform such administrative and
related services as may from time to time be reasonably requested by the
Portfolio, which shall include without limitation: a) arranging for the
preparation and filing of the Portfolio's tax returns and preparing financial
statements and other financial reports for review by the Portfolio's independent
auditors; b) coordinating the Portfolio's annual audit; c) developing the
Portfolio's budget and establishing its rate of expense accrual; d) overseeing
the Portfolio's custodian and transfer agent and other service providers,
including monitoring the daily income accrual and collection, expense accrual
and disbursement, and computation of the Portfolio's net asset value; verifying
the calculation of performance data for the Portfolio; monitoring the trade
reporting for portfolio securities transactions; monitoring the pricing of
portfolio securities and compliance with amortized cost procedures, if
applicable; and monitoring the computation of the Portfolio's income and capital
gains and confirming that they have been properly allocated to the holders of
record; e) taking responsibility for compliance with all applicable federal
securities and other regulatory requirements; f) taking responsibility for
monitoring the tax status of the Portfolio so that its investors can qualify as
regulated investment companies under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; g)
arranging for preparation of agendas and supporting documents for and minutes of
meetings of Trustees, committees of Trustees, and investors; h) maintaining
books and records relating to such services; and i) providing such other related
services as the Portfolio may reasonably request, to the extent permitted by
applicable law. Morgan shall provide all personnel and facilities necessary in
order for it to provide the services contemplated by this paragraph.
Morgan assumes no responsibilities under this Agreement other than to
render the services called for hereunder, on the terms and conditions provided
herein. In the performance of its duties under this Agreement, Morgan will
comply with the provisions of the Declaration of Trust and By-Laws of the
Portfolio and the Portfolio's stated investment objective, policies and
restrictions, and will use its best efforts to safeguard and promote the welfare
1
<PAGE>
of the Portfolio, and to comply with other policies which the Board of Trustees
may from time to time determine.
2. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Morgan shall with respect to each Portfolio create
and maintain all records relating to its activities and obligations under this
Agreement in such manner as will meet the obligations of the Portfolio under the
1940 Act, with particular attention to Section 31 thereof and Rules 31a-1 and
31a-2 thereunder. All such records shall be the property of the Portfolio and
shall at all times during the regular business hours of Morgan be open for
inspection by duly authorized officers, employees or agents of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. In compliance with the requirements of Rule 31a-3 under
the 1940 Act, Morgan hereby agrees that all records which it maintains for the
Portfolio are the property of the Portfolio and further agrees to surrender
promptly to the Portfolio any such records upon the Portfolio's request.
3. LIAISON WITH AND OPINION OF THE PORTFOLIO'S INDEPENDENT PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS.
3.1. Morgan shall act as liaison with the Portfolio's independent public
accountants and shall provide, upon request, account analyses, fiscal year
summaries and other audit-related schedules. Morgan shall take all reasonable
action in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement to assure that
the necessary information is made available to such accountants for the
expression of their opinion, as such may be required by the Portfolio from time
to time.
3.2. Morgan shall take all reasonable action, as the Portfolio may from
time to time request, to obtain from year to year favorable opinions from the
Portfolio's independent public accountants with respect to its activities
hereunder in connection with the preparation of the Portfolio's registration
statement on Form N-1A, reports on Form N-SAR or other periodic reports to the
Securities and Exchange Commission and with respect to any other requirements of
such Commission.
4. ALLOCATION OF CHARGES AND EXPENSES. Morgan shall bear all of the
expenses incurred in connection with carrying out its duties hereunder. The
Portfolio shall pay the usual, customary or extraordinary expenses incurred by
the Portfolio, including without limitation compensation of Trustees; federal
and state governmental fees; interest charges; taxes; membership dues in the
Investment Company Institute allocable to the Portfolio; fees and expenses of
any provider other than Morgan of services to the Portfolio under a
co-administration agreement (the "Co-Administrator"), Morgan pursuant to the
Investment Advisory Agreement and this Agreement, Pierpont Group, Inc. pursuant
to the Portfolio Fund Services Agreement, the Portfolio's custodian for all
services to the Portfolio (including safekeeping of funds and securities and
maintaining required books and accounts), independent auditors, legal counsel
and of any transfer agent, registrar or dividend disbursing agent of the
Portfolio; brokerage expenses; expenses of preparing, printing and mailing
reports, notices, proxy statements and reports to investors and governmental
offices and commissions; expenses of preparing, printing and mailing agendas and
supporting documents for meetings of Trustees and committees of Trustees;
insurance premiums; expenses of calculating the net asset value of interests in
the Portfolio; expenses of meetings of investors in the Portfolio; expenses
relating to the issuance of interests in the Portfolio; and litigation and
indemnification expenses.
5. COMPENSATION OF MORGAN. For the services to be rendered and the
expenses to be borne by Morgan hereunder, the Portfolio shall pay Morgan a fee
at an annual rate as set forth on Schedule A attached hereto. This fee will be
computed daily and payable as agreed by the Portfolio and Morgan, but no more
frequently than monthly.
2
<PAGE>
6. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF MORGAN. Morgan shall not be liable for any
error of judgment or mistake of law or for any act or omission in the
performance of its duties hereunder, except for willful misfeasance, bad faith
or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of the
reckless disregard of its obligations and duties hereunder.
7. ACTIVITIES OF MORGAN. The services of Morgan to the Portfolio are not
to be deemed to be exclusive, Morgan being free to engage in any other business
or to render services of any kind to any other corporation, firm, individual or
association.
8. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated at any time, without
the payment of any penalty, by the Board of Trustees of the Portfolio or by
Morgan, in each case on not more than 60 days' nor less than 30 days' written
notice to the other party.
9. SUBCONTRACTING BY MORGAN. Morgan may subcontract for the performance
of its obligations hereunder with any one or more persons; PROVIDED, HOWEVER,
that, unless the Portfolio otherwise expressly agrees in writing, Morgan shall
be as fully responsible to the Portfolio for the acts and omissions of any
subcontractor as it would be for its own acts or omissions.
10. FURTHER ACTIONS. Each party agrees to perform such further acts and
execute such further documents as are necessary to effectuate the purposes
hereof.
11. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written
consent.
12. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and
understanding between the parties hereto and supersedes all prior agreements,
terminations, extensions or other understandings relating to Morgan's provision
of financial, fund accounting oversight or administrative services for the
Portfolio. The captions in this Agreement are included for convenience of
reference only and in no way define or delimit any of the provisions hereof or
otherwise affect their construction or effect. Should any part of this Agreement
be held or made invalid by a court decision, statute, rule or otherwise, the
remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby. This Agreement shall
be binding and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their
respective successors, to the extent permitted by law.
13. NOTICE. Any notice or other communication required to be given
pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed duly given if delivered or mailed by
registered mail, postage prepaid (1) to Morgan at Morgan Guaranty Trust Company
of New York, 522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036, Attention: Funds
Management, or (2) to the Portfolio at its principal place of business as
provided to Morgan, Attention: Treasurer.
14. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
15. ADDITIONAL PORTFOLIOS. This agreement may be made applicable to any
additional Portfolio from time to time by agreement of Morgan and each such
Portfolio and the adding of such Portfolio to Exhibit I.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed and delivered in their names and on their behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, all as of the day and year first above written. The
undersigned officer of each Portfolio has executed this Agreement not
individually, but as an officer of the Portfolio under the Portfolio's
3
<PAGE>
Declaration of Trust, dated as set forth on Exhibit I, and the obligations of
this Agreement are not binding upon any of the Trustees or investors of the
Portfolio individually, but bind only the trust estate.
EACH PORTFOLIO LISTED ON EXHIBIT I
By ________________________________
Matthew Healey, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK
By ________________________________
[Name, Title]
JPM625
4
SCHEDULE A
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FEES
PORTFOLIOS LISTED ON EXHIBIT I
The annual administrative services fee charged to and payable by
each Portfolio listed on Exhibit I, as amended from time to time (the "Master
Portfolios"), is equal to its proportionate share of an annual complex-wide
charge. This charge is calculated daily based on the aggregate net assets of the
Master Portfolios and in accordance with the following annual schedule:
0.09% on the first $7 billion of the Master Portfolios' aggregate
average daily net assets; and 0.04% of the Master Portfolios'
aggregate average daily net assets in excess of $7 billion LESS
the complex-wide charge of the Co-Administrator.
The portion of this charge payable by each Master Portfolio is determined by the
proportionate share that its net assets bear to the total of the net assets of
the Master Portfolios, The Pierpont Funds, The JPM Institutional Funds, The JPM
Advisor Funds and other investors in the Master Portfolios for which Morgan
provides similar services.
Approved: July ___, 1996
Effective August 1, 1996
RMMFFAS5
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT I
DATE OF EFFECTIVE
PORTFOLIO DECLARATION OF TRUST DATE
The Treasury Money Market Portfolio 11/4/92 8/1/96
The Money Market Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The Tax Exempt Money Market Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The Short Term Bond Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The U.S. Fixed Income Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The Tax Exempt Bond Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The Selected U.S. Equity Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The U.S. Small Company Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The Non-U.S. Equity Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The Diversified Portfolio 1/29/93 8/1/96
The Non-U.S. Fixed Income Portfolio 6/16/93 8/1/96
The Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 6/16/93 8/1/96
The New York Total Return Bond Portfolio 6/16/93 8/1/96
The Series Portfolio* 6/24/94 8/1/96
The Asia Growth Portfolio
The Japan Equity Portfolio
The European Equity Portfolio
*In the case of The Series Portfolio, references to the "Portfolio" refer to its
individual series as the context requires.
PORTFOLIO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
FUND SERVICES AGREEMENT
FUND SERVICES AGREEMENT made as of the 15th day of January, 1994, as
amended and restated as of July 11, 1996, between each of the trusts set forth
on Schedule I (individually, a "Trust"), and PIERPONT GROUP, INC., a New York
corporation (the "Group").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, each Trust is an open-end management investment company,
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940
Act");
WHEREAS, the Trust has retained organizations to be its custodian,
transfer agent, exclusive placement agent and services agent, and an
administrator to administer and manage all aspects of the Trust's day-to-day
operations (except for providing a Chief Executive Officer pursuant to this
Agreement and for those services provided pursuant to the Trust's Investment
Advisory Agreement and Administrative Services Agreement, each with Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York ("Morgan")); and
WHEREAS, the Trust and its Trustees wish to engage the Group to assist
the Trustees in carrying out their duties as Trustees in supervising the Trust's
affairs;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust and the Group hereby agree as follows:
1. Beginning on the date hereof, the Group shall provide facilities and
personnel to assist the Trustees in carrying out their duties as Trustees in
supervising the affairs of the Trust, including without limitation:
a) Organization of the times and participation in the preparation
of agendas for Trustees' meetings;
b) Providing personnel acceptable to the Trustees to act in the
capacity of Chief Executive Officer when so requested by the Trustees; and
c) Oversight and review of the performance of services to the
Trust by others, including review of registration statements, annual and
semi-annual reports to shareholders, proxies, compliance procedures with
applicable legal, regulatory, and financial requirements, current market and
legal developments in the investment management industry, materials presented to
the Trustees for approval, and any other matters as directed by the Trustees.
1
<PAGE>
2. In return for the services provided hereunder, the Trust will pay the
Group a fee in an amount representing the reasonable costs of the Group in
providing services hereunder, payable in a manner corresponding as closely as
practicable to the Trust's receipt of such services, all as determined from time
to time by the Trustees.
3. The Group shall not be liable for any error of judgment or for any
loss suffered by the Trust in connection with the matters to which this
Agreement relates, except a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith
or gross negligence on its part in the performance of its duties or for reckless
disregard by it of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.
4. This Agreement shall continue in effect until December 23, 1994, and
may be renewed by the Trustees; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this Agreement may be
terminated by the Trust at any time without the payment of any penalty by the
Trustees or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities (as
defined in the 1940 Act) of the Trust, upon not less than six (6) months'
written notice to the Group, or by the Group at any time, without the payment of
any penalty, upon not less than six (6) months' written notice to the Trust.
This Agreement shall terminate automatically in the event of its assignment (as
defined in the 1940 Act).
5. The Group's activities will be limited to performing the services
hereunder for the Trust and any other registered investment company which has
the same Trustees as the Trust. No employee of the Group shall engage in any
other business or devote his time and attention in part to the management or
other aspects of any business whether of a similar or dissimilar nature except
with the consent of the Trustees of the Trust.
6. The Trustees have authorized the execution of this Agreement not
individually, but as Trustees under the Trust's Declaration of Trust, and the
Group agrees that the obligation of this Agreement are not binding upon any of
the Trustees or shareholders individually, but bind only the trust estate.
7. Any notice or other communication required to be given pursuant to
this Agreement shall be deemed duly given if delivered or mailed by registered
mail, postage prepaid (1) to the Group at 461 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017,
Attention: President or (2) to the Trust at the address set forth on the cover
of its Registration Statement as then in effect or at such other address as
either party shall designate by notice to the other party.
8. One or more additional trusts may become party to this Agreement by
execution of an addendum which states that such trust shall be added to Schedule
I, specifies the effective date with respect to such trust and is signed by such
trust and Group.
9. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York.
2
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amended and
Restated Fund Services Agreement to be executed by their officers designated
below as of July 11, 1996.
EACH OF THE FOLLOWING PORTFOLIOS:
THE TREASURY MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO
THE MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO
THE TAX EXEMPT MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO
THE SHORT TERM BOND PORTFOLIO
THE U.S. FIXED INCOME PORTFOLIO
THE TAX EXEMPT BOND PORTFOLIO
THE SELECTED U.S. EQUITY PORTFOLIO
THE U.S. STOCK PORTFOLIO
THE U.S. SMALL COMPANY PORTFOLIO
THE NON-U.S. EQUITY PORTFOLIO
THE EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY PORTFOLIO
THE DIVERSIFIED PORTFOLIO
THE NEW YORK TOTAL RETURN BOND PORTFOLIO
THE SERIES PORTFOLIO
By __________________________________
Matthew Healey, Chief Executive Officer
PIERPONT GROUP, INC.
By __________________________________
Nina O. Shenker, President
JPM623
3
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE I
State of Effective
Portfolio Organization Date
The Treasury Money Market Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Money Market Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Tax Exempt Money Market Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Short Term Bond Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The U.S. Fixed Income Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Tax Exempt Bond Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Selected U.S. Equity Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The U.S. Stock Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The U.S. Small Company Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Non-U.S. Equity Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The Diversified Portfolio New York 1/15/94
The New York Total Return Bond Portfolio New York 4/01/94
The Non-U.S. Fixed Income Portfolio New York 9/24/94
The Series Portfolio New York 3/21/94
JPM623
