INTERIORS INC
PREC14A, 2000-11-22
LUMBER & WOOD PRODUCTS (NO FURNITURE)
Previous: INTERIORS INC, SC 13D, 2000-11-22
Next: INTERIORS INC, PREC14A, 2000-11-22




                                  SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (Rule 14a-101)
                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
           Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
                      Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant  [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]

Check the appropriate box:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                         <C>
[X]  Preliminary Proxy Statement            [ ]  Confidential, For Use of the Commission
                                                 Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ]  Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ]  Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]  Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
</TABLE>


                                 INTERIORS, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                             The Broderick Committee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]    No fee required.

[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction  computed  pursuant
     to Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
     calculated and state how it was determined):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5)  Total fee paid:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided in Exchange Act Rule
     0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting  fee was paid
     previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
     or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (1)  Amount previously paid:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (3)  Filing Party:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (4)  Date Filed:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>

                              *    *    *    *    *

                                   ATTENTION:
                      THIS PACKAGE CONTAINS PROXY MATERIALS
                            THAT ARE IN OPPOSITION TO
                    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF INTERIORS, INC.

                              *    *    *    *    *

                                December __, 2000

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

         You should have recently  received  proxy  materials  from the Board of
Directors of Interiors,  Inc. that relate to its Annual Meeting of  Stockholders
to be held on December 15, 2000. At that meeting,  you will be asked to re-elect
the current members of the Company's Board of Directors.

         We strongly  believe,  however,  that three of these  individuals - Max
Munn,  Roger  Lourie and  Richard  Josephberg  - have  failed to  fulfill  their
corporate  and  fiduciary  responsibility  to the Company.  As a result,  we are
opposing the  re-election of these  individuals  and are presenting to you three
directors  who are  committed,  on  behalf of and in the best  interests  of all
stockholders,  to addressing the problems at Interiors.  We are not opposing the
re-election of James G. Bloise, who is the fourth Board of Directors nominee.

         We  explain  our  beliefs  in  detail  in  the  proxy   statement  that
accompanies  this  letter,  and we request that you give our  materials  careful
consideration as you make your decision in electing individuals to the Company's
Board of Directors this year. We appreciate your support and ask that you return
the enclosed gold proxy card in the enclosed  postage-paid  envelope today. Even
if you have already voted, you can change your vote by returning this proxy card
- the last proxy card that you sign and return is the one that will be counted.

         TIME IS SHORT.  PLEASE SIGN,  DATE AND RETURN THE  ENCLOSED  PROXY CARD
TODAY.

         If you have any  questions  or need  assistance  in voting your shares,
please call  Corporate  Investor  Communications,  Inc.  at a special  toll free
number (866) 875 - 6642.

         Thank you for your consideration.
                                               The Broderick Committee
                                               Jerry L. Bashore
                                               Charles R. Broderick, III
                                               William F. Carroll
                                               Carl F. McWilliams


<PAGE>

                                 PROXY STATEMENT
                                IN OPPOSITION TO
                             THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                               OF INTERIORS, INC.

                              *    *    *    *    *

                         Annual Meeting of Stockholders

                                December 15, 2000

                              *    *    *    *    *


                                  INTRODUCTION

         This Proxy  Statement  is  furnished  to the  holders of Class A Common
Stock,  par value $.001 per share ("Class A Common  Stock"),  and Class B Common
Stock, par value $.001 per share ("Class B Common Stock"), of Interiors, Inc., a
Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),  in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by a voting group known as the "Broderick  Committee" that the following
four stockholders have formed:

                                Jerry L. Bashore
                            Charles R. Broderick, III
                               William F. Carroll
                               Carl F. McWilliams

         This  Proxy   Statement  is  being   furnished  in  opposition  to  the
solicitation  of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company in  connection
with the Annual  Meeting of  Stockholders  (the "Annual  Meeting") to be held on
Friday,  December 15, 2000 at 10:00 a.m., or any  adjournments or  postponements
thereof.

         It is expected that this Proxy  Statement  and the enclosed  proxy card
will be mailed on or about  December  __, 2000 to all  stockholders  entitled to
vote at the Annual Meeting.

         We control  2,803,940  shares of Class A Common Stock,  which represent
5.44% of the total  shares of Class A Common Stock  outstanding  and entitled to
vote at the Annual Meeting. We are some of the former stockholders of Model Home
Interiors,  Inc. ("MHI"), a interior  merchandising company that was acquired by
the Company in February 1999 and is currently a  wholly-owned  subsidiary of the
Company.

         At the Annual Meeting, the Company is asking stockholders to elect four
directors to the Board of Directors for the upcoming year. We believe that three
of these  individuals  - Max Munn,  Roger  Lourie and Richard  Josephberg - have
failed to fulfill their corporate and fiduciary  responsibility  to the Company.
This failure centers primarily on the following problems:



<PAGE>

         o    Financial Mismanagement. These individuals have driven the Company
              to the brink of financial  ruin. The Company has recurring  losses
              and  cash  flow  deficits,   negative  working  capital,  impaired
              liquidity,  continuing  loan  defaults and an audit opinion with a
              "going concern" qualification.

         o    Questionable  Loans and Cash Payments.  The Company has made loans
              and  cash  payments  to Mr.  Munn's  relatives  at a time  when we
              believe these  individuals  should have been conserving  available
              cash to fund  operations  and avoid  additional  interest  expense
              associated with increased borrowing.

         o    Management Entrenchment.  As the Company's financial situation has
              declined,  these  individuals have apparently  sought to avoid any
              threat to their  positions as directors of the Company.  The Board
              of  Directors   has  taken  a  number  of  actions  that  have  an
              anti-takeover  purpose or effect and result in the  potential  (if
              not  actual)  entrenchment  of  management  to  the  detriment  of
              stockholders.

         o    Prior  Business  History  of Max Munn.  Max Munn,  at age 56,  has
              repeatedly failed in his efforts to profitably run a business. Mr.
              Munn's  business  history has been one of failure and  significant
              losses to investing stockholders.

         o    Operational  Mismanagement.  Based on the financial performance of
              the Company, we believe that these individuals have utterly failed
              in their attempts to  successfully  implement the business plan of
              the  Company.  The  Company has failed to  successfully  integrate
              recent acquisitions,  and these individuals have failed to achieve
              their stated  strategic  mission of becoming  the "leading  single
              source provider of decorative accessories for the home."

         As a  result,  we  oppose  the  election  of three  of the  individuals
nominated  by the  Board of  Directors  - Max Munn,  Roger  Lourie  and  Richard
Josephberg  - and are  presenting  to the  stockholders  three  individuals  for
election.  These individuals are Carl F. McWilliams,  Charles M. Egan and Kinsey
C. Craichy. Additional information on these individuals can be found on pages 11
and 12. WE RECOMMEND THAT THE COMPANY'S STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE NOMINEES SET
FORTH ABOVE. We are not opposing the re-election of James G. Bloise,  who is the
fourth Board of Directors nominee.

         At the Annual Meeting, the Company is presenting two additional matters
to its  stockholders.  First,  the Company is asking  stockholders to ratify the
appointment of Arthur  Andersen LLP as independent  auditors for the Company for
the fiscal year  ending  June 30,  2001.  WE ARE MAKING NO  RECOMMENDATION  WITH
RESPECT TO THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.

         Second,  the Company is asking  stockholders  to approve a  one-for-ten
reverse  stock  split of Class A Common  Stock  and  Class B Common  Stock.  The
Company's  proxy  materials  present a detailed  discussion  of a reverse  stock
split,  including its advantages and disadvantages.  We believe that the reverse
stock split, as the Company pointed out, has an anti-takeover  effect that could
result in the  potential  (if not  actual)  entrenchment  of  management  to the
detriment of  stockholders,  a concept that we explain in more detail below. For
example, the Company could issue additional shares, from the increased available
amount of authorized and unissued  shares  following the reverse stock split, to
management  or other  individuals  who would side with the Board of Directors on
any matter that presented a threat to current  management.  New share  issuances
would also be potentially  dilutive to stockholders.  AS A RESULT, WE OPPOSE THE
TEN-FOR-ONE  REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND RECOMMEND  THAT THE COMPANY'S  STOCKHOLDERS
VOTE "AGAINST" THAT MATTER.



                                       2
<PAGE>

                                VOTING PROCEDURES

         According to the proxy  materials that the Company's Board of Directors
has  distributed,  the Board of  Directors  has fixed the close of  business  on
October  27,  2000 as the  record  date  (the  "Record  Date")  for  determining
stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of that
date, 51,508,611 shares of Class A Common Stock were issued and outstanding, and
2,455,000 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued and outstanding.

         Each share of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding on the Record
Date is entitled to one vote,  and each share of Class B Common Stock issued and
outstanding on the Record Date is entitled to five votes. Neither the holders of
Class A Common  Stock nor the holders of Class B Common  Stock have the right to
cumulate  votes.  An  affirmative  vote of a plurality  of the shares of Class A
Common  Stock and Class B Common  Stock,  voting as a single  class,  present in
person or  represented  by proxy at the  Annual  Meeting  and  entitled  to vote
thereon, is required for the election of directors. The shares of Class A Common
Stock that we control  represents  4.40% of the total voting power at the Annual
Meeting with respect to the election of directors.

         As mentioned  above, we oppose the election of three of the individuals
nominated  by the  Board of  Directors  - Max Munn,  Roger  Lourie  and  Richard
Josephberg  - and are  presenting  to the  stockholders  three  individuals  for
election  - Carl F.  McWilliams,  Charles  M.  Egan and  Kinsey C.  Craichy.  In
addition,  we are not opposing the  re-election  of James G. Bloise,  who is the
fourth Board of Directors nominee.

         In order to support our nominees,  the Company's stockholders must sign
and return the enclosed gold proxy card in the enclosed postage paid envelope as
soon as possible.  Each  returned  proxy card should  indicate  approval for the
election  of the three  nominees  that we are  presenting.  Because  we are only
presenting three nominees to the Company's stockholders, the returned proxy card
will also grant the authority to vote for a fourth  nominee,  who will have been
presented by the Company's  Board of Directors.  There can be no assurance  that
any of the  Company's  nominees  will serve on the Board of  Directors  if he is
elected with any of our nominees.

         A broker who holds shares in "street name" has the authority to vote on
certain  uncontested  items  when  it has not  received  instructions  from  the
beneficial  owner.  A broker,  however,  will not be  permitted  to exercise its
discretion  in  connection  with either our  nominees or the Board of  Directors
nominees  because it is a  contested  item.  Where the  broker has not  received
instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares in a contested matter,  the
inability  of the broker to vote is  referred  to as a "broker  nonvote."  These
broker nonvotes will not be counted for purposes of determining the existence of
a quorum, and also will not be counted as voting for any nominees in an election
of  directors.  In order to avoid  these  broker  nonvotes  with  respect to our
nominees,  we request that all beneficial  owners return the enclosed proxy card
immediately,  or contact their brokers  immediately and instruct them to execute
and return the gold proxy card on their behalf as soon as possible.



                                       3
<PAGE>

         Any  person  giving a proxy  has the  right to  revoke  it before it is
exercised.  It may be revoked either by filing an instrument of revocation  with
the  Secretary  of the  Company or by  delivering  at the Annual  Meeting a duly
executed  proxy  bearing a later date.  It also may be revoked by attending  the
Annual Meeting and voting in person.  Any stockholder that completes and returns
the enclosed  gold proxy card prior to the Annual  Meeting will have revoked any
proxy that he or she has previously completed.

         A stockholder may also abstain or (only with respect to the election of
directors) withhold his or her vote  (collectively,  "Abstentions") with respect
to each item submitted for stockholder approval. Abstentions will be counted for
purposes of  determining  the  existence  of a quorum.  Abstentions  will not be
counted as voting in favor of the relevant item.


                       REASONS SUPPORTING A CHANGE IN THE
                        BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

         During  the  past  several  years,  the  performance  of the  Board  of
Directors and of Max Munn, the Chairman,  President and Chief Executive  Officer
of the Company,  has been devastating to the Company, its financial position and
its business prospects.  With the exception of Mr. James G. Bloise, who recently
joined  the Board of  Directors  in  September  2000,  each of the  other  three
directors  of the Company  (Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie) have been in
control of the  Company  for five years or more.  The  Company  has  experienced
substantial losses in four of the last five years.

         In our opinion, Messrs. Munn, Josephberg and Lourie have been unable to
operate the Company  successfully.  The legacy of these three directors has been
one of  failure.  They have  presided  over net  losses,  cash flow and  working
capital  deficits,  impaired  liquidity,  loan defaults,  numerous  questionable
related party  transactions,  management  entrenchment  and the delisting of the
common stock from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. They have been unable to integrate
acquisitions,  expand product lines or enter new markets.  We believe that it is
imperative  that Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie step aside to permit the
stockholders  to elect new leadership for the Company to prevent further erosion
of  stockholder  value.  The alternate  slate of directors  nominated to replace
Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie will implement changes designed to (i) put
the Company on a sound financial  footing,  (ii) sell or liquidate  unprofitable
businesses,  (iii)  properly  integrate  existing  businesses and (iv) implement
policies  designed to increase  the  profitability  of  economically  successful
business units.

Financial Mismanagement

         Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie  have  driven the Company to the
brink of  financial  ruin.  In its  filings  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  ("SEC"),  the Company has  reported  recurring  losses and cash flow
deficits, negative working capital, impaired liquidity, continuing loan defaults
and an audit opinion with a "going concern"  qualification.  Questionable  loans
and cash payments  have been made to the  relatives of Mr. Munn.  Despite all of
these problems,  Mr. Munn consistently  reports that the Company has "turned the
corner."



                                       4
<PAGE>

     Continuing Losses

         Under the  leadership  of Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and  Lourie,  the
Company  has  sustained  substantial  net losses in four of the past five fiscal
years.  The  greatest  losses have come during the past two fiscal  years during
which  numerous  acquisitions  were  approved  and  consummated  by the Board of
Directors.  Of the  approximately  $32 million in net losses of the Company over
the past five  years,  approximately  $26.6  million of those  losses  have come
during the past two years.  The Company in its most recent Annual Report on Form
10-K has admitted that Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie have been unable to
successfully  integrate business acquisitions into the Company and the recurring
losses  indicate a lack of capacity to operate the Company  profitably.  And the
current fiscal year has begun with more losses.  Reported  results for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2001 show a net loss of $831,000.

     Cash Flow Deficits and Liquidity

         The Company also suffers from a severe cash flow  deficit.  The Company
has had  negative  operating  cash flows for each of the last three fiscal years
and for the first quarter of the current fiscal year.  This requires the Company
to borrow  substantial  sums of cash to fund  operations.  Borrowing  by Messrs.
Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie to fund operations and implement  their  aggressive
acquisition  strategy has resulted in significant  financing costs. At September
30, 2000,  the Company had a total long term debt  obligation  of  approximately
$35.1  million.  The  debt  service  on this  amount  is a  severe  drain on the
Company's cash flow. For the quarter ended September 30, 2000,  interest expense
increased to approximately $2.4 million. These are funds that would otherwise be
available to fund business operations in the ordinary course.

         As of June 30,  2000,  more  than 61% of the total  additional  paid-in
capital of the Company  ($38.7  million of $63.3  million)  has been  dissipated
under the management of Messrs. Munn, Josephberg and Lourie.

     Negative Working Capital and Loan Defaults

         The Company is experiencing  severe negative working capital  primarily
due to the Company's continuing failure to meet certain  requirements  contained
in the  Company's  loan  documents.  At September  30,  2000,  the Company had a
working capital deficit of approximately $22.4 million.

         Although the Company has obtained  default waivers on its bank lines of
credit and  revolving  loans and bank term loans,  certain  secured  convertible
notes in the amount of  approximately  $15.3  million  remain in default and the
acceleration  of such notes could result in the  acceleration  of the bank debt.
The default on the secured  convertible notes relates to the failure to register
with the SEC certain  securities  by September  30, 2000,  the  delisting of the
Company's  securities  from the Nasdaq  SmallCap  Market and the  failure to pay
approximately $1 million in accrued interest to the noteholders.



                                       5
<PAGE>

         The financial  mismanagement of Messrs. Munn, Josephberg and Lourie has
resulted in a situation  where it is unlikely  that the Company  will be able to
meet its debt service obligations,  come into compliance with loan covenants and
generate sufficient cash to fund needed working capital.  Current management has
not put forth a  workable  plan to solve the  Company's  financial  problems  or
enhance  stockholder value and should not be trusted to effect a turnaround over
the course of the next twelve months.

     "Going Concern" Opinion

         The  culmination  of five years of financial  mismanagement  by Messrs.
Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie has been the Company's receipt of a "going concern"
opinion by the Company's auditors.  In its audit opinion dated October 13, 2000,
Arthur Andersen,  LLP stated that the Company's  recurring net losses,  negative
operating cash flows and net working capital deficit raised  "substantial  doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern."  Similarly,  in the
Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC in October 2000, it is
stated by the Company that "no assurance  can be given...  that the Company will
be able to continue  operations  as a going  concern."  It is clear that Messrs.
Munn,  Josephberg  and  Lourie  are  unable to cope with the  current  financial
situation brought about by their own mismanagement.

Questionable Loans and Cash Payments

         While the Company's financial  situation  continued to worsen,  Messrs.
Munn, Josephberg and Lourie participated in the following activities:

         o    Approximately  $15.3  million  of the  Company's  debt  carries an
              extreme  interest rate of 29%, while at the same time Laurie Munn,
              wife of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
              Company,  owes the Company  over $2.5  million  which has not been
              repaid.  A substantial  portion of Mrs. Munn's debt to the Company
              carries an interest  rate of 6.5%,  well below the interest  rates
              being paid by the  Company on its $35.1  million of debt.  To make
              matters  worse,  the Company is not  accruing any interest on Mrs.
              Munn's obligation.

         o    In fiscal year 1999, the Board of Directors  approved  advances of
              $458,000  to Max Munn at 6.5%  interest at a time when the Company
              was  experiencing  severe  cash flow and  liquidity  problems  and
              paying much higher  interest rates on borrowed  capital.  Although
              Mr. Munn  repaid the  principal,  the Company  forgave the accrued
              interest on the  obligation  to the benefit of Mr. Munn and to the
              expense of the stockholders.

         o    During  fiscal year 2000,  the Board of Directors  once again made
              advances to Mr. Munn in the  aggregate  amount of $283,000 at 6.5%
              interest.  At the time,  the Company was paying  interest rates on
              its debt obligations ranging from 8% to 29%. However, the interest
              rate is a sham because the Company is not accruing any interest on
              Mr. Munn's  obligation.  Even in the face of persistent  financial
              difficulties,   Mr.



                                       6
<PAGE>

              Munn  continues  to engage  in  self-dealing  transactions  at the
              expense of the stockholders.

         o    During the past four years,  cash  payments  have been made to Max
              Munn's  father for  so-called  "consulting  services." In 1999 and
              2000, these payments added up to $135,000.  The agreement has been
              extended to June 30,  2006 as a further  cash drain at the expense
              of the Company and its stockholders.

         Mr. Munn  apparently  believes  that he and his family are  entitled to
benefit economically at the expense of the Company's  stockholders.  These loans
and payments were made at a time when Messrs. Munn, Josephberg and Lourie should
have been  conserving  available cash to fund  operations  and avoid  additional
interest expense associated with increased  borrowing.  Each director has a duty
to refrain from engaging in self-dealing and  self-interested  transactions that
are detrimental to the Company and Mr. Munn has failed to adequately explain how
his actions are in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders.

Management Entrenchment

         As the  Company's  financial  situation  has  declined,  Messrs.  Munn,
Josephberg  and Lourie  have  sought to avoid any threat to their  positions  as
directors of the Company.  The following  actions of the Board of Directors have
an  anti-takeover  purpose or effect and result in the potential (if not actual)
entrenchment of management to the detriment of stockholders.

      Class B Common Stock

         The Company's charter  authorizes the Board of Directors to issue up to
60  million  shares of Class A Common  Stock and 2.5  million  shares of Class B
Common  Stock.  The shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote
together as a single class on all matters  except as otherwise  required by law.
However,  in terms of voting  strength  the  shares of Class B Common  Stock are
equivalent to 12.5 million  shares of Class A Common Stock because the shares of
Class B Common Stock carry five votes per share as opposed to one vote per share
on the  shares of Class A Common  Stock.  Of the 2.5  million  shares of Class B
Common Stock  authorized,  Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie have issued to
Laurie Munn,  Mr.  Munn's  wife,  a total of 2,455,000  shares of Class B Common
Stock  representing a voting block of 12,275,000 shares in the upcoming election
of directors.

         Although you as stockholders  have paid in full for your stock and have
capital at risk in this election, Laurie Munn and Max Munn have not paid for the
shares of Class B Common Stock  issued to Laurie  Munn.  Not only do Laurie Munn
and  Max  Munn  get  five  votes  counted  for  every  one of  your  votes,  the
stockholders  are prevented from taking certain actions under Delaware law (such
as acting by consent) unless the  stockholders  receive a supermajority  vote of
75% of each class of common stock,  effectively  giving Laurie Munn and Max Munn
the ability to block any proposal  that would  challenge  corporate  control.  A
separate class of common stock that is tightly controlled by family members is a
classic device to entrench management.  These shares of Class B Common Stock are
not fully  paid and  votes  relating  to these  shares  should  not count in the
election of directors.



                                       7
<PAGE>

     Rights Plan

         In January 2000, Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie adopted a Rights
Plan pursuant to which the Company made a dividend to holders of common stock of
one right for each  outstanding  share of common  stock.  The rights,  which are
designed to deter a takeover of the  Company,  become  exercisable  when a party
acquires  10% or more of the  Company's  voting  stock or  announces an offer to
acquire  30% or more of such  stock..  Although in the right hands a Rights Plan
can be a useful tool to force potential  corporate raiders to negotiate with the
Board of Directors, it also can be used improperly to insulate management from a
challenge by the Company's stockholders for corporate control.

     Voting Arrangements

         The Company has entered  into voting  arrangements  with the holders of
large blocks of the Company's common stock.  Seaside Partners,  L.P., the holder
of 6,343,062  shares of Class A Common  Stock,  and the former  stockholders  of
Concepts 4, Inc., the holder of 7,545,876  shares of Class A Common Stock,  have
agreed to vote all of their  respective  shares for the election of the nominees
of the Board of Directors at the meeting on December 15, 2000.  This  represents
13,888,938 votes for Messrs. Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie and was done to reduce
any threat to their control of the Company.

     Max Munn's Compensation Arrangements

         In the event of a "change  of  control"  of the  Company,  the Board of
Directors  has granted a golden  parachute  to Max Munn that will entitle him to
receive  five  times his annual  salary of  $375,000.  This is a $1.875  million
payment that the Company cannot  afford.  He also will be entitled upon a change
of  control  to  receive  shares  of  stock  equal  to all  outstanding  options
previously granted to him. This is without payment for those shares. Through the
last fiscal  year,  Mr. Munn had been  granted  options for the  purchase of 2.5
million shares of common stock all of which remain outstanding. As a result, Mr.
Munn has ensured that the stockholders  will suffer  additional  dilution upon a
change of control and that any such event will benefit him personally as well as
increase his post change of control voting strength on all corporate matters.

         If our  slate of  directors  is  successful,  it may be  deemed to be a
"change in control"  under Max Munn's  Employment  Agreement  dated  November 1,
1998.  If successful in the  election,  however,  we would  challenge Mr. Munn's
right to receive any cash payments or shares of stock under this arrangement.

Prior Business History of Max Munn

         Max Munn, at age 56, has repeatedly failed in his efforts to profitably
run a business.  As described below, Mr. Munn's business history has been one of
failure and significant losses to investing stockholders.



                                       8
<PAGE>

         o    Mr. Munn has served as Chairman of the Board of Decor Group,  Inc.
              from  June  1996 to the  present.  That  company  went  public  in
              November  1996  at an  offering  price  of $10  per  share.  As of
              November 16, 2000, the stock was trading at under $0.01 per share,
              resulting in substantial losses to stockholders.

         o    Mr.  Munn  served as  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of
              Collectors' Guild  International,  Inc. from 1980 to 1990. In June
              1990,  Collectors' Guild International,  Inc. filed for bankruptcy
              and was subsequently liquidated.

         o    Mr.  Munn served as a director of  Photo-to-Art,  Inc.  until late
              1999. Photo-to-Art, Inc. filed for reorganization under Chapter 11
              of the  Bankruptcy  Code  in  February  2000,  but  the  case  was
              subsequently  converted to a Chapter 7  liquidation  proceeding in
              June 2000.

         o    Mr. Munn has served as a director of CSL  Lighting  Manufacturing,
              Inc. from March 1990 to the present.  As of November 14, 2000, the
              company's  stock  price had  declined  from our $0.50 per share to
              approximately $0.03 per share in less than two years.

         We, the  stockholders  of the Company,  must act now to remove Mr. Munn
from  office  so that the  Company  does not join Mr.  Munn's  list of  business
failures. Based on Mr. Munn's previous business history, the stockholders of the
Company should be concerned that if Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie remain
as directors, the Company's financial condition will continue to deteriorate and
the stockholders  will risk losing all or substantially  all of their investment
in the Company. The shares of Class A Common Stock have already lost over 90% of
their  value  in the past two  years.  The  stockholders  cannot  allow  this to
continue.

Operational Mismanagement

         In addition to the devastating financial  mismanagement of the Company,
Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie have utterly  failed in their attempts to
successfully  implement  the business  plan of the Company.  Although we believe
that the  Company's  business  model can  ultimately  be  successful,  we do not
believe that  Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie have the ability to achieve
success  with that  business  model.  The  Company  has  failed to  successfully
integrate recent acquisitions and the Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie have
failed to achieve their stated strategic mission of becoming the "leading single
source provider of decorative accessories for the home."

     Failure to Successfully Integrate Acquisitions

         The most damaging  failure of Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie has
been their admitted inability to integrate  effectively the various acquisitions
of accessory manufacturers that have been made by the Company since 1998. In the
Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,  2000,
Messrs. Munn,  Josephberg and Lourie admitted that although it had acquired nine
businesses since March 1998, it had "experienced  difficulty" in integrating the
operations of its operating  divisions  and capturing  economies of scale.  As a
result



                                       9
<PAGE>

of this failure,  Messrs. Munn, Josephberg and Lourie turned formerly profitable
businesses into businesses that were generating losses.

     Acquisitions Inconsistent With Stated Business Plan

         Although certain acquisitions were made in furtherance of the Company's
business  strategy,  Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and  Lourie  made a  number  of
investments  in  businesses  that did not  contribute  to the  execution  of the
strategic  vision of the Company.  The Company's  investments in Focus Line, CSL
Lighting Manufacturing,  Inc. and Photo-to-Art,  Inc. were all failures, in each
case  diverting  precious  resources  away from the Company's  core business and
deviating from the Company's business plan.

     Failure to Expand Product Lines and Markets

         In the  Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30,  2000,  Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie also  admitted  that the
Company had  "experienced  difficulty" in expanding the Company's  product lines
through  acquisition and internal  growth,  and expanding into new markets.  The
expansion of the Company's  product line and expansion  into new markets are key
components of the  Company's  business plan that Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and
Lourie are unable to accomplish. As a result of their own admitted failures, the
Company  incurred  substantial  net losses during 1999 and 2000 of more than $26
million.

Delisting of Securities

         On October 11, 2000,  the Company's  securities  were delisted from the
Nasdaq  SmallCap  Market  because of the Company's  failure to maintain  certain
asset and bid price requirements.  The delisting of the Company's securities was
a direct result of the poor financial performance of the Company that has led to
a common stock price of $0.15 as of November 21, 2000 and a dwindling  amount of
net  tangible  assets.  The failure of Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie to
maintain  Nasdaq's  minimum  listing  requirements  so as to prevent  the Nasdaq
action  delisting the  Company's  securities  has adversely  affected the market
value and  liquidity of the  Company's  securities.  In addition,  the Company's
securities are subject to the "penny stock" rules which may restrict the ability
of  broker  dealers  to  sell  the  securities  and  may  adversely  affect  the
marketability of the Company's securities.

It's Time for a Change in the Management and Direction of the Company

         Messrs.  Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie have had control of the policies
and  direction  of the Company  for the past five years.  Not only have they not
been able to successfully  implement the strategic plan of the Company,  Messrs.
Munn,  Josephberg  and Lourie have taken the  Company to the brink of  financial
ruin.  Current  management  simply does not have the financial  and  operational
ability to effect a turn around in the Company before it is too late.

         The  proposed  slate  of  directors  represent  a fresh  start  for the
Company.  The proposed  directors bring substantial  experience and integrity to
the Company.  The proposed directors have the management and business experience
to integrate acquisitions, to achieve economies of



                                       10
<PAGE>

scale, to expand products and markets and to implement the strategic  mission of
the Company.  The proposed  slate of directors will seek to put the Company on a
sound financial footing,  sell or liquidate  unprofitable  businesses,  properly
integrate  existing  businesses,  maximize the earnings of profitable  units and
regain the  confidence  of the Company's  customers and trade  creditors and the
market.

         IT IS  IMPORTANT  THAT YOUR VOTE BE  COUNTED.  PLEASE  VOTE NOW FOR THE
PROPOSED  SLATE OF  DIRECTORS  NOMINATED  BY US.  YOUR VOTE IS  CRITICAL  TO THE
CONTINUED VIABILITY AND SUCCESS OF THE COMPANY.


                              ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

         Four  directors  will be elected at the Annual  Meeting.  We oppose the
election of three of the  individuals  nominated by the Board of Directors - Max
Munn,  Roger  Lourie  and  Richard  Josephberg  -  and  are  presenting  to  the
stockholders  three  individuals for election - Carl F.  McWilliams,  Charles M.
Egan and Kinsey C. Craichy. In addition,  we are not opposing the re-election of
James G. Bloise, who is the fourth Board of Directors nominee.

         As mentioned above, the election of each nominee for director  requires
the  affirmative  vote of a plurality  of the shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock, voting as a single class, present in person or represented
by proxy at the Annual  Meeting and  entitled to vote  thereon.  If the proxy is
executed in such manner as not to withhold  authority for the election of any or
all of the nominees for directors, then the persons named in the proxy will vote
the shares represented by the proxy for the election of the three nominees named
below.   Because  we  are  only  presenting  three  nominees  to  the  Company's
stockholders,  the returned proxy card will also grant the authority to vote for
a fourth  nominee,  who will  have  been  presented  by the  Company's  Board of
Directors. If the proxy indicates that the stockholder wishes to withhold a vote
from one or more nominees for director,  such  instructions  will be followed by
the persons named in the proxy.

         Each of our  nominees  has  consented  to  being  named  in this  Proxy
Statement and has agreed to serve if elected.  We have no reason to believe that
any of the nominees  will be unable or unwilling to serve.  There are no current
arrangements  between  any  nominee  and any other  person  pursuant  to which a
nominee was selected.

         The following biographical information discloses each nominee's age and
business experience:

         Kinsey C.  Craichy  (age 37).  Mr.  Craichy has served as Chairman  and
Chief Executive Officer of VitalCast.com, Inc. ("VitalCast"), an Internet health
company,  since June 1999.  Mr.  Craichy  conceived  and  founded  VitalCast,  a
Web-based and multi-media site dedicated to Integrative and Alternative Medicine
in January 1999.  From October 1991 to September  1996,  Mr.  Craichy  served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Arzco Medical Systems,  Inc., now known
as CardioCommand,  Inc. ("CardioCommand"),  a medical device company, and during
this time was  responsible  for a turnaround  of the company.  Mr.  Craichy also
served as Chairman of  CardioCommand  from  October 1991 to December  1998,  and
continues to serve as a Director of  CardioCommand.  Since 1987, Mr. Craichy has
also  been  President  of KCC



                                       11
<PAGE>

International,  Inc., a corporate  finance and strategic  consulting  firm.  Mr.
Craichy has many years of corporate development  experience with small to medium
sized public and private  companies,  serving in various  capacities as Founder,
CEO,  Director,  investor,  strategist and consultant,  and currently  serves as
Chairman  of the Tampa Bay  Chapter  of the  Council  of  Growing  Companies,  a
national CEO organization.

         Charles M. Egan (age 64).  Mr. Egan is Vice  Chairman  and  Director of
Cort  Business  Services  Corporation  ("CORT"),  a  national  furniture  rental
company.  He had served as Chairman  and  Director of CORT from  September  1993
until  March  2000,  having  been with CORT  since the  acquisition  of  General
Furniture  Leasing Company in September 1993. Mr. Egan joined General  Furniture
Leasing Company in 1989 and became its President and Chief Executive  Officer in
1992.  From 1985 to 1989,  Mr.  Egan was  Executive  Vice  President  of Mohasco
Corporation,  and was responsible for its furniture manufacturing companies. Mr.
Egan was  President of CORT from 1980 to 1985. A national  company with sales of
approximately $350 million,  CORT became a part of Berkshire  Hathaway,  Inc. in
the first quarter of 2000.

         Carl F. McWilliams (age 41). Mr.  McWilliams has served as President of
MHI, an interior  merchandising  company  providing  sale and lease  packages of
model furnishings to builders and developers,  since 1995. Mr. McWilliams served
as Controller of MHI from 1983 to 1986,  and as Vice  President of MHI from 1986
to 1995. MHI is a wholly-owned  subsidiary of the Company, which acquired MHI in
February 1999. In business since 1980, MHI realizes sales of  approximately  $13
million from its operations in the United States, east of the Mississippi River.

         WE RECOMMEND THAT THE COMPANY'S  STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES SET
FORTH ABOVE.

         None of these  nominees is a current  director or executive  officer of
the  Company,  and no  family  relationships  exist  among  any of the  nominees
directors or between any of the directors and executive officers of the Company.

         According  to the  Company's  filings with the SEC,  directors  receive
annual cash compensation of $30,000,  paid quarterly,  for their services to the
Company as directors,  and are reimbursed for any expenses  actually incurred in
connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors.  In addition,  the
Company's 1994 Director Stock Option and  Appreciation  Rights Plan provides for
an annual grant of options to each director to purchase 10,000 shares of Class A
Common  Stock at fair  market  value at date of grant.  Options  are  granted to
directors as of the second Monday in May of each year.







                                       12
<PAGE>

                       CERTAIN INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO
                    THE BRODERICK COMMITTEE AND THE NOMINEES

The Broderick Committee

         The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each
of us.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                Occupation                             Business Address
----                                ----------                             ----------------
<S>                                 <C>                                    <C>
Jerry L. Bashore                    Vice President - Sales                 10120 Bacon Drive
                                    Model Home Interiors, Inc.             Beltsville, Maryland  20705

Charles R. Broderick, III           President                              2920 Dede Road
                                    The Bees Distributing Co.              Firksburg, Maryland  21048
                                    (wholesale beer distribution)

William F. Carroll                  Executive Vice President               10120 Bacon Drive
                                    Model Home Interiors, Inc.             Beltsville, Maryland  20705

Carl F. McWilliams                  President                              10120 Bacon Drive
                                    Model Home Interiors, Inc.             Beltsville, Maryland  20705
</TABLE>

         Charles R. Broderick, III and Carl F. McWilliams are brothers-in-law.

Voting Agreement and Security Ownership

         On November 22, 2000,  each of us entered into a Voting  Agreement (the
"Voting  Agreement")  with respect to the shares of Class A Common Stock that we
own.  Under the  Voting  Agreement,  we agreed to vote our  shares at the Annual
Meeting in favor of our three  nominees,  as  described  above,  and in the same
manner with respect to any extraordinary  corporate  transaction,  any change in
the management or Board of Directors of the Company,  any material change in the
present  capitalization or dividend policy of the Company,  any amendment to the
Company's  Articles of  Incorporation or Bylaws or other proposal or transaction
that  changes  in any manner  the  voting  rights of any class of the  Company's
capital stock and any other material change in the Company's corporate structure
or business.

         The  following  table  sets  forth,  as of  the  Record  Date,  certain
information  with  respect to  beneficial  ownership of shares of Class A Common
Stock  by each of us and by each of our  nominees  to the  Board  of  Directors.
Beneficial  ownership  includes shares,  if any, held in the name of the spouse,
minor children or other relatives of a director living in such person's home, as
well as shares,  if any, held in the name of another person under an arrangement
whereby the director or  executive  officer can vest title in himself at once or
at some future time. Unless otherwise indicated, we hold all shares disclosed in
the table in our own  names.  We do not own  shares  of any  other  class of the
Company's equity.



                                       13
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Amount and Nature of
Name                                                Beneficial Ownership                 Percent of Class (%)
----                                                --------------------                 --------------------
<S>                                                       <C>                                    <C>
Jerry L. Bashore                                            700,695                              1.36
Charles R. Broderick, III                                   700,695                              1.36
William F. Carroll                                          700,695                              1.36
Carl F. McWilliams*                                         701,855 (1)                          1.36

The Broderick Committee as a group (four
  persons)                                                2,803,940                              5.44

Kinsey C. Craichy*  (2)                                      75,000                               **
Charles M. Egan*  (3)                                            --                               --
</TABLE>
_____________________
* Nominee to the Board of Directors.
** Percentage of ownership is less than one percent of the outstanding shares of
Class A Common Stock.

(1)  Amount disclosed includes 1,160 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially
     owned  by  Mr.  McWilliams'  spouse  through  her  broker.  Mr.  McWilliams
     disclaims  any  beneficial  ownership  with respect to these 1,160  shares,
     which are not subject to the Voting Agreement.
(2)  Mr. Craichy's business address is P.O. Box 1038, Tampa, Florida 33601.
(3)  Mr. Egan's business address is 11250 Waples Mill Lane, Suite 500,  Fairfax,
     Virginia 22030.


Acquisition of Model Home Interiors, Inc. by the Company

         As  disclosed  above,  each  of  us is a  former  stockholder  of  MHI,
including Carl F.  McWilliams,  who is being presented as a nominee to the Board
of Directors at the Annual Meeting and is currently  President of MHI. As former
stockholders of MHI, each of us has received,  and is entitled to receive in the
future,  payments from the Company in connection with the Company's  acquisition
of MHI, as described below.

         On February 26, 1999, the Company acquired MHI pursuant to an Agreement
and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") dated December 31, 1998 by and among
the Company,  MHI Acquisition Corp. and MHI. The purchase price that the Company
paid to the former  stockholders  of MHI  consisted  of (a)  $2,000,000  in cash
payable  at  closing,  (b)  promissory  notes of the  Company  in the  aggregate
principal amount of $230,766  delivered at closing to extinguish  obligations of
MHI to certain of its former stockholders and (c) shares of Class A Common Stock
with a fair market value of $2,300,000  payable on the 18th month anniversary of
the  closing,  as described  below.  Each of us received his pro rata portion of
cash at closing.

         Pursuant to the Merger  Agreement,  the Company also agreed to issue to
the former  stockholders  of MHI  shares of Class A Common  Stock with a maximum
fair market value of $2,000,000  (the "Earnout  Shares") upon the  attainment of
certain  earnings goals by MHI. The amount of Earnout Shares,  if any, issued to
the former  stockholders  of MHI is being  determined by the earnings of MHI for
the fiscal years ending on December 31, 1999,  2000 and 2001. The Earnout Shares
would be held in escrow  together  with the shares of Class A Common  Stock that
would be payable on the 18th month anniversary of the closing.



                                       14
<PAGE>

         At the time of closing,  the Company  deposited  into escrow  1,056,342
shares of Class A Common Stock to secure the Company's obligation to deliver the
shares of Class A Common  Stock  payable  on the 18th month  anniversary  of the
closing  and to secure  payment  of the  promissory  notes.  If the value of the
shares of Class A Common  Stock  held in escrow  were to fall  below  $1,840,000
based on any 10  day-average  of the closing  sales price for such  shares,  the
Company  would be  required  to  deposit  additional  shares  into  the  escrow.
Accordingly,  on October 26,  1999,  August 5, 2000,  and August 25,  2000,  the
Company deposited  665,000,  968,271 and 2,162,837  additional shares of Class A
Common Stock, respectively, into escrow.

         During the first year  following the  acquisition  of MHI, MHI achieved
certain earnings threshold criteria  established at the time of the transaction.
Accordingly,  on March 21, 2000,  the Company  released  763,561  Earnout Shares
valued at $644,000  (based on a price of $0.84373  per share as of December  31,
1999),  to the former  stockholders of MHI. We acquired shares of Class A Common
Stock at that time as follows:

              Name                                    Number of Shares
              ----                                    ----------------
              Jerry L. Bashore                             95,445
              Charles R. Broderick, III                    95,445
              William F. Carroll                           95,445
              Carl F. McWilliams                           95,445

         Based on the 10  day-average  of the closing price of shares of Class A
Common Stock on August 28, 2000, the former stockholders of MHI were entitled to
4,842,003  shares of Class A Common Stock on the 18th month  anniversary  of the
closing.  On August 28, 2000,  there were  currently  only 4,088,889 such shares
being held in escrow to satisfy the Company's obligation.

         Due to a decrease  in the price of the shares of Class A Common  Stock,
on September 15, 2000,  the Company  deposited  753,114 shares of Class A Common
Stock into the escrow  account.  On October 27,  2000,  the Company  released an
aggregate of 4,842,003 shares of Class A Common Stock (based on a price of $0.22
per share as of October  31,  2000) from the escrow as the  payment of shares of
Class A Common Stock on the 18th month  anniversary of the closing.  We acquired
shares of Class A Common Stock at that time as follows:

              Name                                    Number of Shares
              ----                                    ----------------
              Jerry L. Bashore                             605,250
              Charles R. Broderick, III                    605,250
              William F. Carroll                           605,250
              Carl F. McWilliams                           605,250

         On November 3, 2000,  the Company  deposited  an  additional  2,419,100
shares of Class A Common Stock into the escrow  account to secure future earnout
obligations owed to the former stockholders of MHI. Pursuant to the terms of the
escrow agreement,  Mr. McWilliams,  as the representative of all individuals who
are eligible to receive the Earnout  Shares,  has the authority to vote all such
additional  shares of Class A Common Stock,  but has no other power with respect
to such shares.  While we expect to receive Earnout Shares in the future,  there
is no certainty at



                                       15
<PAGE>

this time as to the exact  number  of  shares,  if any,  that the  Company  will
distribute  to us, as  determined  by the  earnings of MHI for the fiscal  years
ending December 31, 2000 and 2001.

Employment Agreements

         As a condition to the  obligations  of MHI under the Merger  Agreement,
each of Jerry L. Bashore,  William F. Carroll,  and Carl F.  McWilliams  entered
into employment agreements with MHI as of February 26, 1999.

         Mr. Bashore's  employment  agreement  provides for him to serve as Vice
President - Sales of MHI and  provides  for a base salary of $40,000 and payment
of commissions.  Mr. Carroll's employment agreement provides for him to serve as
Executive  Vice  President  of MHI and provides for a base salary of $76,000 and
payment of commissions. Mr. McWilliams' employment agreement provides for him to
serve as  President  of MHI and  provides  for a base  salary  of  $78,000.  All
employment agreements provide for annual bonuses of up to two percent,  based on
the level of commission payments,  of MHI's annual net income. These bonuses are
payable in cash or in shares of Class A Common Stock.

         The employment agreements have the following terms and conditions. Each
agreement is for a term of three years.  The Company may terminate the agreement
with or without cause. If the employee is terminated without cause, the employee
will be entitled to receive  severance pay equal to the employee's annual salary
in effect at the time for the lesser of the  remaining  term of the agreement or
one year. If the employee is terminated for any other reason,  the employee will
be entitled to receive his salary through the date of termination.

         The  employment   agreements   also  contain   certain   nondisclosure,
nonsolicitation and noncompetition  provisions.  Each employee has agreed not to
disclose any confidential  information relating to MHI's business.  In addition,
each  employee  has agreed not to solicit any of MHI's  customers or hire any of
its  employees  during the term of the agreement and for a period of three years
thereafter.  Finally, each employee has agreed not to compete in any manner with
MHI during the term of the agreement and for a period  ranging from one to three
years thereafter.


                             ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

         We have retained  Corporate Investor  Communications,  Inc. ("CIC") for
solicitation and advisory services in connection with this  solicitation.  Under
the  agreement  with  CIC,  CIC will  receive  a fee of at least  $45,000,  plus
reimbursement  for its  reasonable  out-of-pocket  expenses.  We have  agreed to
indemnify CIC against certain liabilities and expenses.  CIC may employ up to 25
people in connection  with the  solicitation  of proxies for the Annual Meeting.
Proxies will be  solicited by mail,  courier  services,  Internet,  advertising,
telephone or telecopier or in person. We also intend,  without compensation,  to
solicit proxies by telephone, by mail, or in person.

         We are bearing the costs of this  solicitation.  The total expenditures
to date in preparation for the  solicitation of stockholders  are  approximately
$50,000.  The  total  expenditures  for this  solicitation  are  expected  to be
approximately  $250,000. To the extent permitted by applicable



                                       16
<PAGE>

law, we intend to seek reimbursement from the Company for reasonable expenses in
connection with this  solicitation,  but do not expect to submit the matter to a
vote of stockholders, unless required by law.

         The Company's main offices are located at 320 Washington Street,  Mount
Vernon, New York 10553. We refer you to the Company's proxy materials, which you
should have received, for additional information concerning the Company's stock,
beneficial  ownership  of the stock by, and other  information  concerning,  the
Company's Board of Directors and management,  the principal holders of the stock
and the procedures for submitting stockholder proposals for consideration at the
Company's 2001 Annual Meeting. You can also access the Company's proxy materials
through the SEC's Internet site at www.sec.gov,  which contains  reports,  proxy
and information  statements and other information  regarding  publicly reporting
companies, including the Company.

         We are not aware of any  matters  other  than those  described  in this
Proxy Statement that may be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. However,
if other matters do properly come before the Annual  Meeting,  the persons named
in the enclosed proxy card possess discretionary authority to vote in accordance
with their best judgment with respect to such other matters.

         TIME IS SHORT.  PLEASE SIGN,  DATE AND RETURN THE  ENCLOSED  GOLD PROXY
CARD IN THE  ENCLOSED  POSTAGE  PAID  ENVELOPE  TODAY.  WE  RECOMMEND  THAT  THE
COMPANY'S  STOCKHOLDERS  VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES  SET FORTH IN THE  ENCLOSED  GOLD
PROXY CARD.


         If you have any  questions  or need  assistance  in voting your shares,
please call  Corporate  Investor  Communications,  Inc.  at a special  toll free
number (866) 875 - 6642.


December __, 2000                           The Broderick Committee

                                            Jerry L. Bashore
                                            Charles R. Broderick, III
                                            William F. Carroll
                                            Carl F. McWilliams











                                       17
<PAGE>

                                 INTERIORS, INC.

              PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BRODERICK COMMITTEE


      The undersigned hereby (i) revokes any and all prior proxies in connection
with or related to the  matters  set forth  below and (ii)  appoints  Charles R.
Broderick,  III and Carl McWilliams,  jointly and severally,  proxies, with full
power to act  alone,  and with full  power of  substitution,  to  represent  the
undersigned and to vote, as designated  below and upon any and all other matters
that may  properly  be  brought  before the Annual  Meeting of  Stockholders  of
Interiors,  Inc.  to be held on  December  15,  2000  or at any  adjournment  or
postponement thereof (the "Annual Meeting"),  all shares of Class A Common Stock
of Interiors,  Inc. that the undersigned would be entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting, for the following purposes:

      1.    To elect as directors four persons as set forth below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                       <C>
            (  )  FOR the three nominees proposed by      (  )  WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote
                  the Broderick Committee listed                for the three nominees listed below
                  below (except as written on the line
                  below)
</TABLE>
                                         Kinsey C. Craichy
                                          Charles M. Egan
                                          Carl McWilliams

            The proxies named herein also intend to use this proxy to vote for a
            fourth  person that has been  nominated by the Board of Directors of
            Interiors,  Inc. The proxies named herein are not seeking  authority
            to vote for and will not exercise any such authority with respect to
            Max Munn,  Roger Lourie or Richard  Josephberg.  The proxy materials
            dated November 3, 2000 from Interiors, Inc. contain information with
            respect to the nominees of the Board of Directors of Interiors, Inc.

            To withhold  authority  to vote for any  individual  nominee  listed
            above or for any  nominee of the Board of  Directors  of  Interiors,
            Inc., write that nominee's name on the space provided below:


                        ____________________________________________


      2.    To ratify the  appointment  of Arthur  Andersen  LLP as  independent
            auditors for Interiors, Inc.

            (  ) FOR                (  ) AGAINST             (  ) ABSTAIN

      3.    To approve a  one-for-ten  reverse  stock  split of the  outstanding
            common stock of Interiors,  Inc.  without any decrease in the number
            of authorized shares of common stock.

            (  ) FOR                (  ) AGAINST             (  ) ABSTAIN


<PAGE>

      4.    In their  discretion,  the proxies are  authorized  to vote upon any
            other  business  that may properly  come before the meeting,  or any
            adjournment thereof.


      THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY  EXECUTED,  WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
HEREIN BY THE  SHAREHOLDER.  IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN,  THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED
(1) FOR ALL THREE NOMINEES  LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND A FOURTH  NOMINEE,  (2) ABSTAIN
FROM ITEM 2, AND (3) AGAINST ITEM 3.


___________________________________          ___________________________________
          Printed Name                                    Signature


                                             ___________________________________
                                                          Signature

         [INSERT LABEL]                      Dated:   ___/___/00

                                             (If signing as Attorney,
                                             Administrator, Executor, Guardian
                                             or Trustee, please add your title
                                             as such.)

                   PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission