<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
Commission File Number 0-23950
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
NEW YORK 11-2751509
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)
</TABLE>
TWO AMERICAN LANE, P.O. BOX 5150, GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT 06831-8150
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (203) 861-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
None of the voting securities of the registrant are held by non-affiliates
of the registrant.
<PAGE> 2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The discussion below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K contains certain
forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the rules promulgated
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are based on the beliefs
of the Partnership, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently
available to, the Partnership. A number of important factors could cause the
Partnership's actual growth, results, performance and business prospects and
opportunities in 1997 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in,
or implied by, any such forward-looking statements. These factors include,
without limitation, the factors described below and elsewhere in this Form
10-K.
OVERVIEW
Kenmar Performance Partners L.P. (the "Partnership") was formed as a
limited partnership on June 24, 1985 under the New York Uniform Limited
Partnership Act and adopted the New York Revised Limited Partnership Act (the
"Partnership Act") on October 18, 1991. The Partnership maintains its
principal office at Two American Lane, P.O. Box 5150, Greenwich, Connecticut
06831-8150, with a telephone number of (203) 861-1000. The Partnership is
engaged in the speculative trading of commodities, futures contracts, forward
contracts, foreign exchange commitments, swap contracts, spot (cash)
commodities and options, warrants and other rights on or pertaining to any of
the foregoing, in the United States of America and elsewhere throughout the
world ("Commodity Interests") through the retention of independent commodity
trading advisors ("Advisors"). The objective of the Partnership's business is
appreciation of its assets through the speculative trading of Commodity
Interests. To effectuate this purpose, the Partnership is also authorized to
purchase the interests of other entities engaged in the business of trading,
buying, selling, spreading, swapping and otherwise acquiring, holding and
disposing of Commodity Interests.
In September 1985, the Partnership commenced a private placement of units
of limited partnership interests ("Units") in reliance on the exemptions
afforded by, among others, Sections 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "1933 Act"), and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
Units are offered monthly at a price per Unit equal to the then-current Net
Asset Value per Unit, with a minimum subscription of $26,250 for new investors
other than individual retirement accounts ("IRAs") and qualified retirement
plans and Keogh Plans ("Plans") and $10,500 for IRAs, Plans and existing
Limited Partners, which amounts include selling commissions of $1,250 and $500,
respectively, unless waived in whole or in part. Since the Partnership began
the private placement in 1985, through March 15, 1997, 26,493.86 Units have
been sold for a total of $301,106,997. "Net Asset Value" is defined as total
assets of the Partnership less total liabilities as determined in accordance
with the principles set forth in the Second Restatement of the Limited
Partnership Agreement of the Partnership, dated September 1, 1993, as amended
December 1, 1995 (the "Partnership Agreement"), or where no such principles are
specified therein, in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The term "Net Asset Value
Per Unit" is defined in the Partnership Agreement to mean the Net Asset Value
of the Partnership divided by the number of Units issued and outstanding as of
the date of computation. Investors receive a Confidential Private Placement
Memorandum and Disclosure Document (the "Disclosure Document") which sets forth
the material terms of the investment. The Disclosure Document is updated every
nine (9) months or upon any material change (whichever is sooner), as required
by the Regulations promulgated under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended
(the "CEAct"), and filed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the
"CFTC") in compliance with its Regulations.
Since September 1985, the Partnership has engaged in the speculative
trading of Commodity Interests and will continue to do so until its dissolution
and liquidation, which will occur on the earlier
1
<PAGE> 3
of December 31, 2013 or the occurrence of any of the events set forth in
Section 8.1 of the Partnership Agreement. The Partnership Agreement also
provides that, after having been a Limited Partner for six months and upon ten
business days prior written notice, a Limited Partner may require the
Partnership to redeem all or part of its Units effective as of the close of
business on the last day of any month at the Net Asset Value thereof on such
date. In addition, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner
may, in its sole discretion, and on ten (10) days' notice, require a Limited
Partner to redeem all or part of its Units in the Partnership as of the end of
any month.
The Partnership's general partner is Kenmar Advisory Corp. (the "General
Partner"), a corporation originally organized as a New York corporation in
September 1983 and reorganized as a Connecticut corporation on January 1, 1996.
The General Partner is owned equally and indirectly by Kenneth A. Shewer and
Marc S. Goodman, the sole directors of the General Partner. In accordance with
the provisions of the CEAct and the rules of the National Futures Association
(the "NFA"), the General Partner is registered as a commodity pool operator,
the Advisors are registered as commodity trading advisors and the Commodity
Brokers (as defined below) required to be registered as futures commission
merchants are registered as such, each subject to regulation by the "CFTC."
Each is also a member of the NFA in its respective capacity.
The General Partner, to the exclusion of the limited partners of the
Partnership (the "Limited Partners"), manages and conducts the business of the
Partnership. The General Partner (i) selects and monitors the independent
Advisors and the Commodity Brokers; (ii) allocates and/or reallocates assets of
the Partnership among the Advisors; (iii) determines if an Advisor or Commodity
Broker should be removed or replaced; (iv) negotiates management fees,
incentive fees and brokerage commissions; (v) determines its own compensation;
and (vi) performs such other services as the Partnership may from time to time
request, except that all trading decisions are made by the Advisors retained by
the General Partner. In addition, the General Partner selects the commodity
brokers that will clear trades for the Advisors. Refco, Inc. ("Refco") and ING
(U.S.) Securities, Futures & Options ("ING Futures & Options") are currently
the Partnership's futures commission merchants, and ING Derivatives (London)
Limited ("ING Derivatives") and Refco Capital Markets Ltd. ("Refco Capital
Markets") are the Partnership's foreign exchange dealers (Refco, ING Futures &
Options, ING Derivatives and Refco Capital Markets are collectively referred to
herein as the "Commodity Brokers").
The Partnership itself does not have any employees. Rather, the General
Partner employs 40 persons (as of March 15, 1997) and provides the Partnership
with the services of research, fund administration, client support (marketing)
and management information systems and analysis personnel to conduct its
operational activities.
The General Partner believes that the most effective means of controlling
the risks of trading Commodity Interests is through a diversified portfolio of
Advisors. In general, the General Partner has sought to produce high returns
while controlling risk through the selection of two or more Advisors, often
with diverse trading methodologies. The General Partner's ability to manage
the Partnership is dependent upon an informed and aggressive management style,
one that identifies and acts quickly and decisively on shifting market trends.
Market conditions must dictate the selection of a portfolio of Advisors and the
reallocation of assets among the Advisors. Therefore, when market conditions
suggest that an alternative trading style or methodology might be better suited
to the current market environment, the General Partner alters the portfolio of
Advisors or the allocation of assets among the Advisors, without prior notice
to, or the approval of, the Limited Partners.
The Partnership is not an operating company with "traditional" income or
expenses. It is a stand-alone investment vehicle that offers investors the
opportunity to participate in Commodity Interests under the guidance of
professional Advisors.
<PAGE> 4
FEES AND EXPENSES
Due to the General Partner's active and dynamic allocation and
reallocation of the Partnership's assets, the fees and expenses set forth below
are subject to change at any time. Accordingly, the following fees and
expenses are the current fees charged and expenses of the Partnership as of
March 15, 1997.
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE. In partial payment of the General Partner's assuming
the substantial financial burden of paying all the operating and administrative
expenses of the Partnership (other than the legal fees and expenses of
independent counsel and extraordinary expenses), each month the Partnership
pays to the General Partner an Administrative Fee equal to 1/12 of 1% (1%
annually) of the prior month's beginning Net Asset Value of the Partnership.
Ordinary administrative expenses include but are not limited to accounting,
auditing, recordkeeping, administration, computer and clerical expenses
(including expenses incurred in preparing reports and tax information for
Limited Partners and regulatory authorities, printing and duplication expenses
and mailing expenses), and other expenses incurred by such persons and by the
General Partner and affiliates in providing services to the Partnership.
ADVISORS' MANAGEMENT FEES. The Partnership pays each Advisor a monthly
management fee ranging from .0208% to .3333% of the Net Asset Value of the
assets allocated to each Advisor for management (each, an "Advisor's Portion"),
prior to reduction for this fee and the Advisor's Incentive Fee, if any (as
described below), adjusted, with respect to certain Advisors, to reflect the
leverage at which such Advisor trades its Portion.
ADVISORS' INCENTIVE FEES. In addition to the above, the Partnership pays
each Advisor an incentive fee ranging from 15% to 25% of the appreciation on
that Advisor's Portion. The General Partner will not receive any portion of
the fees payable to any Advisor. The Partnership may enter into substantially
similar compensation arrangements with other Advisors.
Any incentive fees paid to an Advisor will be retained by it even if that
Advisor subsequently experiences losses. No subsequent payment will be made to
that Advisor, however, until that Advisor's Portion again experiences Net New
Trading Profits. In general, "Net New Trading Profits" are the net trading
profits earned on an Advisor's Portion (excluding interest or
interest-equivalent income), decreased by brokerage commissions (paid and
change, if any, in accrued), and decreased by the management fee, if any, with
all such items determined from the first day of the calendar quarter that
immediately follows the last calendar quarter for which an incentive fee was
earned by the Advisor (or, if no incentive fee was earned previously by the
Advisor, from the date such Advisor was allocated its Advisor's Portion) to the
close of business on the last day of the calendar quarter with respect to which
such incentive fee calculation was made. Moreover, because each Advisor is
treated separately, it is possible that one or more Advisors may receive
incentive fees during the same periods for which the Partnership and other
Advisors sustain a net loss.
BROKERAGE COMMISSIONS. The Partnership's current brokerage expenses range
from $9.56 to $30 per roundturn transaction plus non-member exchange fees,
clearing fees and NFA transaction fees. United States exchange fees (including
NFA fees) range from approximately $1.24 to $2.84 per roundturn transaction.
Foreign exchange fees range from approximately $1.18 to $16 per roundturn
transaction, except that foreign exchange fees on certain Japanese financial
instruments are $55 per roundturn transaction. For managing the Partnership's
investment with the Advisors, the General Partner receives from the Commodity
Brokers a portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the Partnership to each.
Refco and ING Futures & Options retain no more than $10 per roundturn
transaction, Refco Capital Markets no more than $5.75, and ING Derivatives no
more than $4.00. Each remits the remainder to the General Partner as
compensation for managing the Partnership.
3
<PAGE> 5
The General Partner may, in its sole discretion, negotiate brokerage
commissions with other commodity brokers on such terms as it deems in the best
interest of the Partnership, which may or may not be similar to the above
brokerage arrangements.
LEGAL FEES AND EXPENSES. The Partnership will be responsible for all
legal fees, expenses (such as outside counsel's fax and copying charges) and
disbursements (such as filing fees, whether paid by the General Partner or
outside counsel). Legal fees for fiscal 1996 were approximately $36,000.
EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES. The Partnership is responsible for all
extraordinary expenses (i.e., litigation expenses) incurred on behalf of the
Partnership. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Partnership has not
paid, and does not anticipate paying, any extraordinary expenses.
OTHER EXPENSES OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS. Although not an expense of the
Partnership, upon initially investing in the Partnership, investors may be
subject to a selling commission payable to independent selling agents, equal to
up to 5% of the then current Net Asset Value per Unit, unless the payment of
all or any portion of such amount is waived by the selling agent.
INTEREST ON ASSETS. Each month, the Partnership receives all interest or
interest-equivalent income actually earned on the Partnership's assets during
that month.
The following chart reflects the actual fees and expenses for the periods
presented. See "Selected Financial Data" below.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
(IN THOUSANDS)
Brokerage Commissions............... $15,905 $17,165 $20,007 $11,511 $4,332
Management Fees..................... 3,317 3,774 4,231 2,326 1,701
Incentive Fees...................... 6,406 7,107 5,900 3,804 391
General Partner's Management Fees... 0 0 786 894 1,132
General Partner's Administrative Fee
for Operating Expenses 1,233 1,497 1,499 656 408
Other Expenses...................... 228 191 358 135 266
</TABLE>
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
THE GENERAL PARTNER. The General Partner receives from the Commodity
Brokers a portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the Partnership to the
Commodity Brokers. Thus, the General Partner has a conflict between its
responsibility to limit or reduce brokerage commissions and its interest in
arranging for higher fees for itself by selecting Advisors who trade more
actively over Advisors who trade less actively.
The General Partner is authorized under the Partnership Agreement to set
the compensation it shall receive for its services as general partner of the
Partnership. As such, the General Partner has a conflict of interest between
limiting fees paid by the Partnership and generating fees for itself.
The General Partner and its affiliates currently manage other commodity
pools and managed accounts, each with a different combination of Advisors, and
intend to continue to solicit and manage the trading for these other commodity
pools and managed accounts. Thus, the General Partner and its affiliates may
be subject to conflicting demands in respect of allocating management time,
services and
4
<PAGE> 6
other functions between the activities they have undertaken with respect to the
Partnership and the activities they have undertaken or will undertake with
respect to other investors, commodity pools, managed accounts and/or Advisors.
Additionally, the greater the amount of assets managed by the General Partner,
the more difficult it may be for the General Partner to maintain the quality of
these services.
The General Partner may also have a conflict of interest between its
responsibility to select the best Advisors for the Partnership and its
responsibility to select the best Advisors for the other commodity pools and
managed accounts for which it serves as manager, because other pools may have
fee structures more advantageous to the General Partner.
The General Partner and its affiliates maintain business relationships
unrelated to the Partnership with commodity trading advisors. In particular,
affiliates of the General Partner have entered into, and may in the future
enter into, marketing agreements with commodity trading advisors pursuant to
which such affiliates are compensated for providing marketing services to such
advisors and for getting assets placed under the management of such advisors.
In addition, pursuant to an agreement among Kenmar, an introducing broker
(which is under common control with an Advisor currently trading for the
Partnership) and one of the Commodity Brokers, the introducing broker receives
from the Commodity Broker a portion of the brokerage commissions generated by
accounts managed by the General Partner and its affiliates and pools operated
by the General Partner and its affiliates that clear through the Commodity
Broker, except that the introducing broker does not receive brokerage
commission rebates with respect to transactions executed on behalf of the
Partnership by its affiliated Advisor. In allocating the Partnership's assets
among Advisors and in determining which Advisors to retain or dismiss, the
General Partner may also have a conflict of interest between allocating funds
to Advisors who otherwise conduct trading on behalf of, or who otherwise have a
business relationship with, the General Partner and/or its affiliates and
allocating funds to Advisors with which the General Partner and/or its
affiliates has no present relationship.
The General Partner and the Commodity Brokers maintain business
relationships unrelated to their efforts on behalf of the Partnership. Thus,
the General Partner has a conflict between its responsibility to negotiate an
amount and form of compensation to be paid the Commodity Brokers that best
serves the Partnership's interests and the General Partner's desire to maintain
its business relationships with the Commodity Brokers.
Neither the General Partner nor any of its affiliates, principals,
directors, officers or employees ("Related Persons") currently trade Commodity
Interests for their own accounts, although it is possible that they may do so
in the future. The records of such trading would not be available to the
Limited Partners. If the General Partner or a Related Person were to trade for
their own accounts they could take positions either similar or opposite to
positions taken by the Partnership, and/or the Partnership and such Related
Persons could from time to time be competing for similar Commodity Interests.
Orders placed by the General Partner or a Related Person to trade Commodity
Interests for their proprietary accounts may reach the market either before or
after similar orders are placed for the Partnership, and this difference in
timing may result in the Partnership receiving less favorable (or more
favorable) prices than those received by such proprietary accounts. Neither
the General Partner nor any Related Person places orders for any Advisor and,
therefore, neither the General Partner nor any Related Person has control over
such timing. It is also possible that the positions taken by such proprietary
accounts may not be held for the same period of time as those positions taken
by the Partnership. Thus, it is unlikely that trading results in such
proprietary accounts would be the same as the performance in the Partnership's
account.
5
<PAGE> 7
THE ADVISORS. Subject to certain limitations, one or more of the Advisors
manage other commodity pools and/or managed accounts as well as trade for their
own proprietary accounts. Since at least some of the Advisors are trading and
will continue to trade other client accounts, such Advisors may be subject to
conflicting demands in respect of allocating management time, services and
other functions between the Partnership and other client accounts. In
particular, such Advisors may have a conflict of interest when rendering advice
to the Partnership, because its compensation for managing some other client
account may differ from its compensation for managing the Partnership's
account, and therefore may provide an incentive to favor such other account.
An Advisor may in the future develop and furnish to, or employ on behalf
of, other investors trading methods or strategies for trading Commodity
Interests similar to or different from those employed and traded on behalf of
the Partnership's account and pursuant to which such other investors may take
positions similar to or opposite from positions taken by the Partnership.
Thus, no assurance may be given that the trading results in such other accounts
will be the same as the performance in the Partnership's account.
Some of the Advisors or their employees currently trade Commodity
Interests for their own account and any or all could do so in the future. Such
trading activity could differ from the trading activity of the Partnership.
For example, the trading positions taken and the length of time such positions
are held by the Partnership could differ from those taken with respect to a
proprietary account. In addition, such proprietary accounts could be charged
brokerage commissions in a significantly different form and amount than those
charged the Partnership and, as a result, an Advisor could be more or less
likely to modify, liquidate or open a position for that account than for the
Partnership's account. Orders for trades for such proprietary accounts could
be placed either before or after similar orders are placed for an Advisor's
other investor accounts, and this difference in timing could result in the
investor accounts receiving less favorable (or more favorable) prices than
those received by such proprietary accounts. Thus, no assurance may be given
that the trading results in such proprietary accounts will be similar to the
performance in the Partnership's account.
The CFTC and certain United States commodity exchanges have established
"speculative position limits" that limit the net long or net short speculative
position any person(s) may hold, own or control in a particular Commodity
Interest on any given day. An Advisor and its principal(s) may, on any given
day, trade up to the position limit established by such regulatory authorities
and, therefore, might be unable to trade those Commodity Interests for the
Partnership. It is not known what effect such inability to trade would have on
the performance results of the Partnership.
In excess of seventy percent of the assets under the management of Dennis
Trading Group, Inc. ("DTG"), an Advisor for the Partnership, are assets of
client pools and accounts managed by the General Partner and its affiliates.
This could have an influence on how DTG does business with the General Partner
and the Partnership.
THE COMMODITY BROKERS. The Commodity Brokers effect transactions for
their customers (including public and private commodity pools) in addition to
the Partnership, and such other customers may compete with the Partnership's
transactions, including with respect to priority of order entry. In addition,
employees of the Commodity Brokers may trade for their own accounts. Since the
identities of the purchaser and seller are not disclosed until after the trade,
it is possible that the Commodity Brokers could effect transactions for the
Partnership in which the other parties to the transactions are the Commodity
Brokers' officers, directors, employees, customers or affiliates. Such persons
might also compete with the Partnership in making purchases or sales of
Commodity Interests without knowing that the Partnership is also bidding on
such Commodity Interests. Since orders are filled in the order in which they
are received by a particular floor broker, transactions for any of such persons
might be executed
6
<PAGE> 8
when similar trades for the Partnership are not executed or are executed at
less favorable prices. However, in entering orders for the Partnership and
such other customer accounts, the Commodity Brokers will use their good faith,
best efforts to achieve an equitable treatment of all accounts, including with
respect to priorities of order entry and allocations of executed trades. In
addition, CFTC regulations prohibit a futures commission merchant from
utilizing its knowledge of one customer's trades for its own or its other
customers' benefit.
RECOURSE BY LIMITED PARTNERS. In evaluating the foregoing potential and
actual conflicts of interest, Limited Partners should be aware that the General
Partner has a responsibility to the Limited Partners to exercise good faith and
fairness in all dealings affecting the Partnership. The responsibility of a
general partner to limited partners is a changing area of the law and Limited
Partners who have questions concerning the responsibilities of the General
Partner should consult their legal counsel. In the event that a Limited
Partner believes that the General Partner has violated its responsibilities,
the Limited Partner may seek legal relief for himself and all other similarly
situated Limited Partners or on behalf of the Partnership under applicable laws
to recover damages from, or to require an accounting by, the General Partner.
Furthermore, Limited Partners are afforded certain rights to institute
reparation proceedings under the CEAct for violations of the CEAct or of any
rule, regulation or order of the CFTC by the General Partner or a Commodity
Broker. A Limited Partner may also institute legal proceedings in court
against the General Partner, the Commodity Brokers or an Advisor for certain
violations of the CEAct or rules, regulations or orders of the CFTC. Excessive
trading of the Partnership's account has been held to constitute a violation of
the antifraud provisions of the CEAct. Limited Partners should be aware that
it may be difficult to establish that excessive trading has occurred due to the
broad trading discretion given to the General Partner in the Partnership
Agreement and the Advisors in the Management Agreements, exculpatory provisions
in the Partnership Agreement and in the Management Agreements, and the lack of
definitive standards in judicial and administrative decisions as to what
constitutes excessive trading.
Under the exculpatory provisions of the Partnership Agreement, the General
Partner shall not be liable to the Partnership or to any of the Partners except
by reason of acts or omissions constituting fraud, willful misconduct, gross
negligence or bad faith. Purchasers of Units may have a more limited right of
action than they would absent such limitations.
The Partnership has agreed to indemnify the General Partner and its
shareholders, officers, directors, employees, and agents against any loss,
liability, damage, costs, or expense resulting from any claim, action, or
proceeding relating to the business or activities undertaken by them on behalf
of the Partnership or actions taken or omitted to be taken by the General
Partner in its capacity as such, provided that the conduct of such person did
not constitute willful malfeasance or gross negligence and was done in good
faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best
interests of the Partnership. In any action brought by a Limited Partner in
the right of the Partnership to which the General Partner or any other person
indemnified pursuant to the foregoing are party defendants, any such person
will be indemnified by the Partnership only to the extent and subject to the
conditions specified in the Partnership Act.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in any action brought by a Limited Partner
in the right of the Partnership, Kenmar may be indemnified only to the extent
and subject to the conditions specified in the Partnership Act. Also,
indemnification of the General Partner or its affiliates by the Partnership
will be limited for losses and liabilities resulting from violations of United
States federal, state or foreign securities laws in connection with the offer
or sale of Units. The CFTC has issued a statement of policy relating to
indemnification of officers and directors of a futures commission merchant
(such as a Commodity Broker) and its controlling persons, under which the CFTC
has taken the position that
7
<PAGE> 9
whether such indemnification is consistent with the policies expressed in the
CEAct will be determined by the CFTC on a case-by-case basis.
COMMODITY INTEREST TRADING AND THE ADVISORS
The profitability of Commodity Interest trading depends in large part upon
the accurate forecasting of price moves or trends in some Commodity Interests.
No assurance can be given as to the accuracy of any Advisor's forecasts or that
any Advisor's trading methods, strategies or decisions will be successful.
Although an oversimplification, most Advisors use varying mixtures of
technical and fundamental analysis. A trading approach based on fundamental
analysis attempts to examine external factors (such as governmental policies,
national and international political and economic events, changing trade
prospects and similar factors that affect the supply and demand for a
particular Commodity Interest) to predict Commodity Interest prices. A
limiting factor in the use of fundamental analysis is that the analyst may not
have knowledge of all of the pertinent factors affecting supply and demand of a
particular commodity. Prices may be affected by factors the analyst did not
consider.
A trading approach based on technical analysis attempts to examine
objective data (such as actual daily, weekly and monthly price fluctuations,
volume variations, and changes in open interest and other related mathematical,
statistical or quantitative data) to predict Commodity Interest prices. A
limiting factor in the use of technical analysis is that such an approach
generally requires price movement data that can be translated into price trends
sufficient to dictate a market entry or exit decision. No assurance can be
given as to the existence of major price moves. Moreover, a trading method or
strategy will not be profitable if there are no price moves or trends of the
kind the method or strategy seeks to identify and follow. In the past there
have been periods without discernible trends and, presumably, such periods will
continue to occur in the future. Periods without such price moves may produce
losses. In addition, any factor that would lessen the prospect of major trends
occurring in the future (such as increased governmental control of or
participation in the markets) may reduce the prospect that a particular trading
method will be profitable in the future. Finally, a technical trading approach
may underperform other trading approaches when fundamental factors dominate
price moves within a given Commodity Interest market.
Regardless of whether a trader uses fundamental analysis, technical
analysis or some combination of the two or some other method, any factor that
would make it more difficult to execute trades at desired prices in accordance
with the signals of that trading method (such as a significant lessening of
liquidity in a particular market) would be detrimental to profitability. Also,
many Advisors may utilize similar analyses in making trading decisions;
therefore, bunching of buy and sell orders can occur, which makes it more
difficult for a position to be taken or liquidated.
The development of a Commodity Interest trading strategy is a continual
process. As a result of further analysis and research into the performance of
an Advisor's methods, changes may have been made from time to time in the
specific manner in which these trading methods evaluate price movements in
various Commodity Interests; it is likely that similar revisions will be made
in the future. As a result of such modifications, the trading methods that may
be used by an Advisor in the future might differ from those presently being
used. Limited Partners will not be informed of such changes in Advisor's
trading methods. Additionally, trading decisions of discretionary Advisors
require the exercise of judgment. The decision not to trade certain Commodity
Interests or not to make certain trades may result at times in missing price
moves and hence profits of great magnitude, which other Advisors willing to
trade these Commodity Interests may be able to capture.
8
<PAGE> 10
Certain Advisors may also engage in transactions in physical commodities,
including exchange for physical transactions. An exchange for physical ("EFP")
is a transaction permitted under the rules of many futures exchanges in which
two parties holding futures positions may close out their positions without
making an open, competitive trade on the exchange. Generally, the holder of a
short futures position sells the physical commodity. The prices at which such
transactions are executed are negotiated between the parties, and such prices
may, under certain circumstances, vary significantly from the actual prices at
which the transactions are traded on the relevant exchanges.
SYNOPSIS OF THE ADVISORS
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission only requires disclosure of
"Major Advisors", i.e., those allocated at least ten percent of the
Partnership's assets. Set forth below is a brief description of the portfolio
of Major Advisors trading for the Partnership as of March 15, 1997, which
differs in part from the portfolio of Advisors in 1996.
DENNIS TRADING GROUP, INC. The principals of Dennis Trading Group, Inc.
("DTG") are Richard J. Dennis and Thomas A. Dennis. DTG employs a multisystem,
computerized strategy comprised of a number of distinct proprietary trading
systems which can be classified as either trend-following or counter-trend in
nature. Based on DTG's on-going research, the number of systems will vary
dynamically over time. In addition, the systems vary in their trade duration;
DTG seeks to profit from short, intermediate, and long-term market
opportunities with signal generation based on the study of price movement both
on a daily and intra-day basis. DTG's portfolio is broadly diversified
throughout the global market sectors including currencies, interest rates,
stock indices, energies, metals, agriculturals, soft commodities and meats.
The compounded annual rate of return for DTG from May 1994 through February
1997 is 77.8%.
EMC CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. The principals of EMC Capital Management,
Inc. ("EMC") are Elizabeth A. Cheval and Jeffrey D. Izenman. The trading
strategy EMC utilizes for the Partnership is technical and trend-following.
EMC may trade in more than ten Commodity Interests at one time, including, but
not necessarily limited to, precious metals, U.S. and foreign financials, stock
indices, certain foreign currencies, grains and grain products, crude oil and
oil products, sugar and coffee. EMC began trading for the Partnership in
October 1990. The compounded annual rate of return for EMC and its principals
from January 1985 through February 1997 is 43.2% in the trading strategy
utilized for the Partnership.
NESSLER FUTURES TRADING CO. Peter Nessler, Jr. is the sole principal of
Nessler Futures Trading Co. ("Nessler"). The trading methods used by Nessler
are based upon both fundamental and technical analysis, with the ultimate
determinations made on the basis of fundamental analysis. Nessler trades
primarily in the agricultural futures and options, but may trade
non-agricultural futures and options on occasion. Nessler began trading for
the Partnership in May 1992. The compounded annual rate of return for Nessler
from January 1988 through February 1997 is 8.0%.
SHERIDAN INVESTMENTS INC. Donald M. Newell, President of Sheridan
Investments Incorporated ("Sheridan"), and Gary G. Knight, Managing Director,
are the company's sole shareholders and principals. Mr. Newell has also been a
principal of LaSalle Portfolio Management, a registered commodity trading
advisor and commodity pool operator, since 1984. The approach used to direct
the trading for Sheridan focuses on the U.S. fixed income markets, seeking to
add value to a long fixed income portfolio through a variety of option related
strategies. Risk is controlled by paying close attention to market volatility
as well as through defensive option strategies designed to cap potential
losses. Sheridan began trading for the Partnership in March 1995. The
compounded annual rate of return for Sheridan from February 1992 through
February 1997 is 7.96%.
9
<PAGE> 11
SJO, INC. The principals of Sjo, Inc. ("Sjo") are Susan Sjo, Stig E.
Ostgaard and Irwin M. Berger. Sjo is trading its Foreign Financial Futures
Program for the Partnership. This trading program utilizes the primary trading
system which identifies major price trends and initiates positions in the
direction of such trends. The Foreign Financial Futures Program utilizes
multiple-time-frame, technical, trend-following models. Trading takes place in
the foreign financial futures of Australia, Germany, UK, France, Japan, Italy
and Switzerland. Sjo began trading for the Partnership in January 1992. The
compounded annual rate of return for Sjo's Foreign Financial Futures Program
from February 1989 through February 1997 is 29.4%.
WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC. The principals of Willowbridge Associates
Inc. ("Willowbridge") are Philip L. Yang, Michael Y. Gan, Theresa C. Morris,
Richard G. Faux, Jr., John C. Plimpton, James J. O'Donnell and Steven R. Crane.
Willowbridge will trade its XLIM Trading Approach ("XLIM"), which is traded on
a discretionary basis by Mr. Yang. Trading decisions are based primarily on
Mr. Yang's analysis of technical factors, fundamentals and market action. XLIM
trades are selected from a wide variety of futures contracts, forwards, spot
and options on United States and international markets, including, but not
limited to, financial instruments, currencies, precious and base metals and
agricultural commodities. Mr. Yang reserves the right to change the portfolio
composition of XLIM. Willowbridge began trading for the Partnership in
December 1995. The compounded annual rate of return for XLIM from February
1988 through February 1997 is 33.5%.
WIZARD TRADING, INC. Jack Schwager and Louis Lukac are equal principals
and shareholders of Wizard Trading Inc. ("Wizard"). Wizard employs a
computerized, multi-system approach which incorporates trend-following,
counter-trend and pattern recognition modules. Variables reviewed by the
system include, but are not limited to, price, volume, open interest and
sentiment. In addition to the trading modules, Wizard also employs two
different money management overlay designed to control individual market and
total portfolio risk. Positions can be taken in a wide variety of global
futures markets including interest rate contracts, currencies, stock indices,
metals, agriculturals, meats and soft commodities. The compounded annual rate
of return for Wizard from November 1993 through February 1997 is 15.8%.
THE COMMODITY BROKERS
The General Partner has responsibility for selecting and monitoring the
Partnership's commodity brokers. The General Partner has selected Refco and
ING Futures & Options to act as the Partnership's futures commission merchants
and ING Derivatives and Refco Capital Markets to act as the Partnership's
foreign exchange dealers.
The Partnership and the Commodity Brokers have entered into non-exclusive
Customer Agreements that provide that the Commodity Brokers may execute some
and will clear all Commodity Interests transactions by or on behalf of the
Partnership in accordance with the instructions provided to the Commodity
Brokers by the Advisors. The Commodity Brokers are responsible for holding and
maintaining certain Partnership assets; executing some and clearing all
Commodity Interests transactions; preparing and transmitting daily
confirmations of transactions and monthly statements of account; calculating
equity balances and margin requirements; and performing similar
transaction-related administrative functions. The Customer Agreements provide
that the Partnership will post margin as required.
REFCO, INC. Refco is an Illinois corporation with a principal place of
business at 111 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3593 and a
telephone number of (312) 930-6500. Refco is registered as a futures
commission merchant with the CFTC and is a member of the NFA in such capacity.
10
<PAGE> 12
According to Refco, as of March 15, 1997, neither Refco nor any of its
principals has been the subject of any administrative, civil, or criminal
action whether pending, on appeal, or concluded, within the preceding five
years that Refco would deem material for purposes of Part 4 of the Regulations
of the CFTC, except the actions discussed briefly below. The descriptions of
these actions are based solely upon information provided by Refco.
On March 12, 1992, Refco settled a CFTC administrative proceeding (In the
Matter of Refco, Inc., CFTC Docket No. 92-15) alleging that Refco failed to
keep the office orders of Mr. Ray E. Friedman (then a director of Refco),
failed to supervise Mr. Friedman*s personal trading, was derivatively liable
for Mr. Friedman*s alleged violations of speculative position limits, and had
thereby violated earlier cease and desist orders. Without admitting any of the
CFTC allegations, Refco settled this matter in order to avoid protracted
litigation costs by paying a civil penalty of $440,000 and by agreeing to a
cease and desist order.
On December 20, 1994, Refco settled a CFTC administrative proceeding (In
the Matter of Refco, Inc., CFTC Docket No. 95-2) in which Refco was alleged to
have violated certain financial reporting, recordkeeping and segregation
provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations as a result of
some reporting and investment practices of Refco during 1990 and 1991. Without
any hearing on the merits of the CFTC allegations and without admitting any of
the allegations, Refco settled the matter and agreed to payment of a $1,250,000
civil penalty, entry of a cease and desist order, and appointment of an
independent consultant to review Refco's financial manual.
On January 23, 1996, Refco settled a CFTC administrative proceeding (In
the Matter of Refco, Inc., CFTC Docket No. 96-2) in which Refco was alleged to
have violated certain segregation and supervision requirements and prior cease
and desist orders. The CFTC allegations concerned Refco's consolidated
margining of certain German accounts which were maintained at Refco from 1989
through April 1992. Refco simply executed and cleared transactions for these
accounts in accordance with client instructions; Refco had no role in raising
funds from investors or in the trading decisions for these accounts. Refco had
received what it considered appropriate authorization from the controlling
shareholder of the accounts* promoters to margin the accounts and transfer
funds between and among the accounts on a consolidated basis. The CFTC
maintained that Refco should not have relied upon such authorizations for the
final consolidation of the accounts. Without admitting any of the CFTC
allegations or findings, Refco settled the proceeding and agreed to payment of
a $925,000 civil penalty, entry of a cease and desist order, and implementation
of certain internal controls and procedures.
ING FUTURES & OPTIONS INC. ING Futures & Options, is a duly registered
futures commission merchant and a member of the N F A. As of November 6, 1995,
ING Futures & Options is also registered as a broker-dealer and a member of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ING Futures & Options which
was formed in 1990, operates under the trade names ING Futures & Options and
ING Securities & Options. ING Futures & Options is also a clearing firm of
each of the principal U.S. futures exchanges and the Chicago Board of Options
Exchange. In January 1994, ING Futures & Options was purchased by
Internationale Nederlanden (U.S.) Capital Holdings Corp. ("ING Capital"), a
wholly owned subsidiary of ING Bank N.V., in Amsterdam, one of the largest
financial institutions in the world. ING Futures & Options is an Illinois
corporation with a principal place of business at 233 South Wacker Drive, Suite
5200, Chicago, Illinois, 60606 and a telephone number of (312) 496-7000.
At any given time, ING Futures & Options may be involved in legal actions,
some of which may seek significant damages. According to ING Futures &
Options, with the exception of the action noted below, during the five years
preceding the date hereof, there have been no administrative, civil or criminal
actions against ING Futures & Options or any of its principals, whether
pending, on appeal or concluded, which are material in light of all the
circumstances.
11
<PAGE> 13
<STOP>
In 1996, two former shareholders of ING Futures and Options filed a demand
for arbitration at the Chicago Board of Trade charging breach of contract and
misappropriation of certain customers and employees. Although ING Futures &
Options believes the claim to be meritless, the suit seeks significant damages.
ING Futures & Options is vigorously defending itself against the claims and
believes that it has meritorious defenses. ING Futures & Options believes that
the ultimate outcome of the claims will not have a material, adverse effect on
ING Futures & Options* financial position.
ING DERIVATIVES (LONDON) LIMITED. ING Derivatives is authorized by the
Securities and Futures Authority. ING Derivatives is also a clearing member of
LIFFE, IPE, & LCE and an Associate Clearing Member of the LME. ING
Derivatives, a wholly owned subsidiary of ING Bank, is incorporated in the
United Kingdom and has its principal office at 75 King William Street, London,
England, EC 4N 7EE and a telephone number of 44 171 410 9944.
REFCO CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. Refco Capital Markets, a wholly owned
subsidiary of The Refco Group Ltd, is organized under the laws of Bermuda.
Refco Capital Markets maintains its principal office at Suite 542, 48
Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda, with a telephone number of (809)
295-6960. Refco Capital Markets is not a registered entity.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership does not own or lease any physical properties. The
Partnership's office is located within the office of the General Partner at Two
American Lane, P.O. Box 5150, Greenwich, CT 06831-8150.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The General Partner is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings
to which the Partnership or the General Partner is a party or to which any of
its assets is subject.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of 1996.
12
<PAGE> 14
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There is no established public trading market for the Units. There were
approximately 1,696 holders of Units at March 15, 1997. Pursuant to the
Partnership Agreement, distributions of profits, if any, will be made at the
sole discretion of the General Partner. As of March 15, 1997 the General
Partner had not made, and the General Partner does not currently intend to
make, any distributions.
In September 1985, the Partnership commenced a private placement of Units
in reliance on the exemptions afforded by, among others, Sections 4(2) of the
1933 Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Similar reliance
has been placed on available exemptions from securities qualification
requirements under applicable state securities laws. Units are offered monthly
at a price per Unit equal to the then current Net Asset Value per Unit, with a
required minimum subscription of $26,250 for new investors other than IRAs and
Plans and $10,500 for IRAs, Plans and existing Limited Partners, which amounts
include selling commissions of $1,250 and $500, respectively. A subscriber may
subscribe for Units in excess of the foregoing minimum amount in increments of
$1,000. As of the date hereof, Units are continuing to be offered and there is
no maximum number of Units that may be purchased or sold.
During the fourth quarter of 1996, 146.78 Units were sold for a total
of $2,185,564.
13
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data of the Partnership has been derived
from the Partnership's financial statements for each of the years 1992 through
1996, which were audited by independent certified public accountants. The
auditor's report of Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C. on the
Partnership's statements of financial position at December 31, 1996 and 1995
and the related statements of operations and changes in partners' capital (net
asset value) for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996
are included elsewhere herein.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT AMOUNTS PER UNIT)
Operations Data:
- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Realized Gains (Losses) $ 33,757 $ 30,855 $ 19,918 $ 18,746 $ 9,419
Change in Unrealized (16,236) 3,675 (6,498) 19,469 (4,069)
Interest Income 5,974 7,735 5,967 2,050 1,441
Brokerage Commissions 15,905 17,165 20,007 11,511 4.322
Management Fees 3,317 3,774 4,231 2,326 1,701
Incentive Fees 6,406 7,107 5,900 3,804 391
General Partner's Management
Fees 0 0 786 894 1,132
General Partner's Administrative
Fee for Operating Expenses 1,233 1,497 1,499 656 408
Other Expenses 228 191 358 135 266
Net Income (Loss) $ (3,594) $ 12,531 $(13,394) $ 20,939 $(1,439)
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit
(Based on Weighted Average
Number of Units Outstanding) $ (375) $ 1,104 $ (1,208) $ 3,738 $ (329)
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset
Value Per Unit $ 432 $ 1,068 $ (1,429) $ 4,753 $ 16
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT AMOUNTS PER UNIT)
Financial Position Data:
- ------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
General Partner's Capital $ 786 $ 763 $ 688 $ 1,249 $ 481
Limited Partners' Capital 110,244 153,015 156,450 123,115 40,387
Partnership Capital 111,030 153,778 157,138 124,364 40,868
Net Asset Value per Unit $ 14,665 $ 14,233 $ 13,164 $ 14,593 $ 9,841
</TABLE>
14
<PAGE> 16
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The discussion below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K contains certain
forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the rules promulgated
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are based on the beliefs
of the Partnership, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently
available to, the Partnership. A number of important factors could cause the
Partnership's actual growth, results, performance and business prospects and
opportunities in 1997 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in,
or implied by, any such forward-looking statements. These factors include,
without limitation, the factors described below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K
OVERVIEW. The assets of the Partnership are used to engage, directly or
indirectly, in the speculative trading of Commodity Interests.
The assets of the Partnership are deposited with the Commodity Brokers in
trading accounts established by the Partnership for the Advisors and are used
by the Partnership as margin to engage in trading. Such assets are held in
either a non-interest bearing bank account or in securities approved by the
CFTC for investment of customer funds. In addition, certain of the
Partnership's assets may also be placed in a custodian account with a cash
manager to maximize the interest earned on assets not committed as margin.
CAPITAL RESOURCES. The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to
have, any capital assets. Redemptions and sales of additional Units in the
future will affect the amount of funds available for trading Commodity
Interests in subsequent periods. None of the Partnership's assets are
committed to overhead or operational expenses.
There are three factors that affect the Partnership's capital resources:
(i) the trading profit or loss generated by the Advisors (including interest
income); (ii) the money invested or redeemed by the Limited Partners; and (iii)
the capital invested or redeemed by the General Partner. The General Partner
has maintained, and has agreed to maintain, at all times a capital account in
such amount, up to a total of $500,000, as is necessary for the General Partner
to maintain a one percent (1%) interest in the capital, income and losses of
the Partnership. All capital contributions by the General Partner necessary to
maintain such capital account balance shall be evidenced by units of general
partnership interests, each of which shall have an initial value equal to the
Net Asset Value per Unit at the time of such contribution. The General
Partner, in its sole discretion, may withdraw any excess above its required
capital contribution without notice to the Limited Partners. The General
Partner, in its sole discretion, may also contribute any greater amount to the
Partnership, for which it shall receive, at its option, additional units of
general partnership interests or Units at their then-current Net Asset Value.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. The Partnership incurs substantial charges from
the payment of management and/or incentive fees to the Advisors and
administrative fees to the General Partner which are payable based upon the Net
Asset Value of the Partnership and are payable without regard to the
profitability of the Partnership. The brokerage commissions to the Commodity
Brokers are also payable without regard to the profitability of the
Partnership, although under certain circumstances such commissions have been,
and may continue to be, higher when Advisors experience profits and as a result
increase their trading activity. As a result, in certain years the Partnership
may have incurred a net loss when trading profits were not substantial enough
to avoid depletion of the Partnership's assets from such fees and expenses.
Thus, due to the nature of the Partnership's business, the success of the
Partnership is dependent upon the ability of the Advisors to generate trading
profits through the speculative trading of Commodity Interests sufficient to
produce capital appreciation after payment of all fees and expenses.
The following paragraphs present a summary of the Partnership's operations
for the calendar years 1994 through 1996 and a general discussion of the
Partnership's trading activities in certain markets
15
<PAGE> 17
during such period. It is important to note, however, that (i) the Advisors
trade in various markets at different times and that prior activity in a
particular market does not mean that such markets will be actively traded by an
Advisor or will be profitable in the future and (ii) the Advisors trade
independently of each other using different trading systems and may trade
different markets with various concentrations at various times. Consequently,
the results of operations of the Partnership can only be discussed in the
context of the overall trading activities of the Partnership,the Advisors'
trading activities on behalf of the Partnership as a whole and how the
Partnership has performed in the past.
As of December 31, 1996, the Net Asset Value of the Partnership was
$111,030,275, a decrease of $42,747,810 from its Net Asset Value of
$153,778,085 at December 31, 1995. The Partnership's 1996 subscriptions and
redemptions totaled $11,587,994 and $50,741,659, respectively. For the year
ended December 31, 1996, the Partnership had revenues consisting of $33,757,205
in realized trading gains, $16,236,226 in change in unrealized trading losses
and $5,974,118 in interest income. For that same year, the Partnership had
expenses consisting of $15,904,878 in brokerage commissions, $3,317,507 in
management fees, $6,405,660 in incentive fees, $1,232,872 in General Partner's
administrative fees and $228,325 in other expenses. This resulted in the
Partnership having net losses of $3,594,145. The Partnership's trading losses
during 1996 were primarily realized in tropicals, petroleums, metals, U.S.
interest rates and European stock indices. The Net Asset Value Per Unit at
December 31, 1996 increased 3.04% from $14,233 at December 31, 1995 to $14,665
at December 31, 1996.
As of December 31, 1995, the Net Asset Value of the Partnership was
$153,778,085, a decrease of $3,359,938 from its Net Asset Value of $157,138,023
at December 31, 1994. The Partnership's 1995 subscriptions and redemptions
totaled $30,526,165 and $46,416,920 respectively. For the year ended December
31, 1995, the Partnership had revenues consisting of $30,855,057 in realized
trading gains, $3,675,033 in change in unrealized trading gains and $7,735,524
in interest income. For that same year, the Partnership had expenses consisting
of $15,540,111 in brokerage commissions, $1,625,408 in other trading fees,
$3,774,200 in management fees, $7,106,694 in incentive fees, $1,497,246 in
General Partner's administrative fees and $191,138 in other expenses. This
resulted in the Partnership having net gains of $12,530,817. The Partnership's
trading gains during 1995 were primarily realized in currencies, global
interest rates and petroleum. The Net Asset Value Per Unit at December 31,
1995 increased 8.12% from $13,164 at December 31, 1994 to $14,233 at December
31, 1995.
As of December 31, 1994, the Net Asset Value of the Partnership was
$157,138,023, an increase of $32,773,756 from its Net Asset Value of
$124,364,267 at December 31, 1993. The Partnership's 1994 subscriptions and
redemptions totaled $74,650,574 and $28,482,713 respectively. For the year
ended December 31, 1994, the Partnership had revenues consisting of $19,918,693
in realized trading gains, $6,498,370 in change in unrealized trading losses
and $5,967,053 in interest income. For that same year, the Partnership had
expenses consisting of $18,109,372 in brokerage commissions, $1,898,431 in
other trading fees, $4,230,861 in management fees, $5,900,006 in incentive
fees, $785,915 in General Partner's management fees, $1,499,109 in General
Partner's administrative fees and $357,787 in other expenses. This resulted in
the Partnership having net losses of $13,394,105. The Partnership's trading
losses during 1994 were primarily realized in currencies, Euro Interest rates,
global stock indexes, petroleum and grains. The Net Asset Value Per Unit at
December 31, 1994 decreased 9.79% from $14,593 at December 31, 1993 to $13,164
at December 31, 1994.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. As a result, any
recent increases in realized or unrealized trading gains may have no bearing on
any results that may be obtained in the future.
To enhance the foregoing comparison of results of operations from year to
year, readers of the Annual Report should examine the Statements of Financial
Condition and Operations for the years discussed above, which are included
herein.
16
<PAGE> 18
LIQUIDITY. Although there is no public market for the Units, a Limited
Partner may redeem his Units in the Partnership as of any month-end occurring
six months or more after such investment was made.
With respect to the Partnership's trading, in general, the Partnership's
Advisors will trade only Commodity Interests that have sufficient liquidity to
enable them to enter and close out positions without causing major price
movements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, most United States commodity
exchanges limit the amount by which certain commodities may move during a
single day by regulations referred to as "daily price fluctuation limits" or
"daily limits." Pursuant to such regulations, no trades may be executed on any
given day at prices beyond the daily limits. The price of a futures contract
has occasionally moved the
daily limit for several consecutive days, with little or no trading, thereby
effectively preventing a party from liquidating his position. While the
occurrence of such an event may reduce or effectively eliminate the liquidity
of a particular market, it will not limit ultimate losses and may in fact
substantially increase losses because of this inability to liquidate
unfavorable positions. In addition, if there is little or no trading in a
particular futures or forward contract that the Partnership is trading, whether
such illiquidity is caused by any of the above reasons or otherwise, the
Partnership may be unable to execute trades at favorable prices and/or may be
unable or unwilling to liquidate its position prior to its expiration date,
thereby requiring the Partnership to make or take delivery of the underlying
interest of the Commodity Interest.
The Partnership's trading may also be impacted by the various conflicts of
interest among the Partnership and the General Partner, the Advisors and the
Commodity Brokers. See "Item 1. Business C Conflicts of Interest."
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Partnership's financial statements, together with the auditor's report
thereon, are included on pages F-1 through F-10 hereof.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
17
<PAGE> 19
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The General Partner, Kenmar Advisory Corp., is the sole general partner of
the Partnership. The General Partner, a corporation originally organized as a
New York corporation in September 1983 and reorganized as a Connecticut
corporation on January 1, 1996, is owned equally and indirectly by Messrs.
Shewer and Goodman. The directors and executive officers of the General
Partner currently are as follows:
MR. KENNETH A. SHEWER, age 43, has been the Chairman and a director of the
General Partner since September 1983. Mr. Shewer was employed by Pasternak,
Baum and Co., Inc. ("Pasternak, Baum"), an international cash commodity firm,
from June 1976 until September 1983. Mr. Shewer left Pasternak, Baum in
September 1983 to form Kenmar Advisory Corp. with Mr. Goodman. Mr. Shewer
created and managed Pasternak, Baum's Grain Logistics and Administration
Department and created its Domestic Corn and Soybean Trading Department. In
1982, Mr. Shewer became co-manager of Pasternak, Baum's F.O.B. Corn Department.
In 1983, Mr. Shewer was made Vice President and Director of Pasternak, Baum.
Mr. Shewer graduated from Syracuse University with a B.S. degree in 1975.
MR. MARC S. GOODMAN, age 48, has been the President and a director of the
General Partner since September 1983. Mr. Goodman joined Pasternak, Baum in
September 1974 and was a Vice President and Director from July 1981 until
September 1983. Mr. Goodman left Pasternak, Baum in September 1983 to form
Kenmar Advisory Corp. with Mr. Shewer. While at Pasternak, Baum, Mr. Goodman
was largely responsible for business development outside of the United States,
for investment of its corporate retirement funds and for selecting trading
personnel. Mr. Goodman has conducted extensive business in South America,
Europe and the Far East. Mr. Goodman was awarded an Economics and Finance
Department Fellowship from September 1969 through June 1971. Mr. Goodman
graduated from the Bernard M. Baruch School of Business of the City University
of New York with a B.B.A. in 1969 and an M.B.A. in 1971 in Finance and
Investments.
MS. ESTHER ECKERLING GOODMAN, age 44, has been the Senior Executive Vice
President of the General Partner since March 1991 and has also served as Chief
Operating Officer of the General Partner since October 1995. Ms. Goodman
joined Kenmar in July 1986 and has been involved in the futures industry since
1974. From 1974 through 1976, she was employed by Conti-Commodity Services,
Inc. and ACLI Commodity Services, Inc., in the areas of hedging, speculative
trading and tax arbitrage. In 1976, Ms. Goodman joined Loeb Rhoades and
Company, Inc., where she was responsible for the development and management of
a managed futures program which, in 1979, became the trading system for an
independent commodity trading advisor of which Ms. Goodman was a founder and
principal. From 1983 through mid-1986, Ms. Goodman was employed as a marketing
executive at Commodities Corp. (USA) of Princeton, New Jersey. Ms. Goodman was
a Director of the Managed Futures Association and its predecessor, the Managed
Futures Trade Association, from 1987 through 1995. In addition, she has
written several articles and has spoken before various professional groups and
organizations on the subject of managed futures. Ms. Goodman attended Vassar
College from 1970-1972 and graduated from Stanford University in 1974 with a
B.A. degree. Ms. Goodman is married to Mr. Marc S. Goodman.
MR. ROBERT L. CRUIKSHANK, age 60, joined the General Partner as its
Executive Vice President in March 1991. Mr. Cruikshank spent 20 years
(1958-1978) at Blyth Eastman Dillon in New York and was its Executive Vice
President in charge of the Securities Division, which included all domestic and
international sales and branch office activities, all trading departments and
the research areas. In 1979, Mr. Cruikshank jointly formed Neild, Cruikshank &
Co., an independent market-maker on the Chicago
18
<PAGE> 20
Board of Options Exchange ("CBOE"), where he remained until 1984, when he
formed his own market making firm, Nassau Corporation. From 1982 to 1984 Mr.
Cruikshank also served as Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of the CBOE,
during which time he was instrumental in the development of the S&P 100 (OEX)
option contract. From 1985, when he left Nassau Corporation, until March 1991,
he served as President and CEO of First Capital Financial Corporation, a
national real estate syndication firm owned by Sam Zell. Mr. Cruikshank
graduated cum laude from Princeton University with a B.A. degree in
economics in 1958.
JOSHUA B. PARKER, ESQ., age 40, has been an Executive Vice President and
the General Counsel of the General Partner since June 1991 and October 1988,
respectively. Mr. Parker has been with Kenmar since October 1988. From
January 1986 through October 1988, Mr. Parker was the
general counsel of Michael Becker & Co., a member firm of the American Stock
Exchange. During that time he was also an independent floor trader, first in
association with Michael Becker & Co. and later in his own firm, Premium
Investments. From May 1985 through January 1986, Mr. Parker was the associate
general counsel of a company in the over-the-counter drug and personal care
industry. From August 1981 through May 1985, Mr. Parker was associated with
the law firm of Baer Marks & Upham. Mr. Parker is a 1981 graduate of the New
York University School of Law with a J.D. degree and a 1977 graduate of Yale
University with a B.A. degree.
Each director of the General Partner serves until the next annual meeting
of stockholders or until a successor is elected. Executive officers of the
General Partner are appointed annually and serve at the discretion of its Board
of Directors. Messrs. Shewer and Goodman hold directorships in the following
entities, all of which are affiliates of the General Partner: Kenmar Asset
Allocation Inc., Kenmar Global Strategies Inc., Kenmar Holdings Inc., Kenmar
Investment Adviser Corp. and Kenmar Securities, Inc. In addition, Mr. Shewer
is a director of KAS Commodities Inc. and Mr. Goodman is a director of MSG
Commodities Inc.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires
the General Partner and the directors of the General Partner to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Based solely on a review of the forms it has received and on representations
from certain reporting persons that no such forms were required for them, the
Company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the
reporting persons were complied with by them.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership has no directors or executive officers. As a limited
partnership, the business of the Partnership is managed by its General Partner
which is responsible for the administration of the business affairs of the
Partnership and receives the compensation described in Item 1 hereof.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The Partnership has no directors or officers. The Partnership delegates
all management of the Partnership's affairs to the General Partner. As of
March 15, 1997, the General Partner owned approximately 53.5807 units of
general partnership interests, representing a 0.50% investment in the
Partnership. The General Partner is indirectly and equally owned by Messrs.
Shewer and Goodman.
19
<PAGE> 21
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The General Partner, Kenmar Advisory Corp., is the sole general partner of
the Partnership and manages and conducts the business of the Partnership. The
Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partner may be compensated in
such form(s) and in such amount as the General Partner, in its sole discretion,
shall determine, after giving due weight to industry standards. As more fully
described in Item 1 hereto, to compensate the General Partner for its
management and operations of the Partnership, its management and monitoring of
the portfolio of the Advisors and its assumption of the substantial financial
burden of paying all the operating and administrative expenses of the
Partnership, the Partnership currently pays administrative fees to the General
Partner. For the year ending December 31, 1996, the General Partner received
$1,232,872 in administrative fees. For the year ending December 31, 1995, the
General Partner received $1,497,246 in administrative fees. For the year
ending December 31, 1994, the General Partner received $1,499,109 in
administrative fees and also received $785,915 in management fees. In
addition, the General Partner receives from the Commodity Brokers a portion of
the brokerage commissions paid by the Partnership to the Commodity Brokers.
<PAGE> 22
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
1. The following financial statements of the Partnership, with the
independent auditor's report, are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
Independent Auditor's Report
Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
Schedule of Securities as of December 31, 1996
Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994
Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Net Asset Value) For the Years
Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Notes to Financial Statements
2. All financial schedules are omitted because such schedules are not
required or the information required has been presented in the aforementioned
financial statements.
3. The following exhibits are filed with this Report or incorporated by
reference as set forth below:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Number Exhibit
- ------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
3.1* Certificate of Limited Partnership for Kenmar Performance Partners L.P.
3.2* Second Restatement of the Limited Partnership Agreement of Kenmar
Performance Partners L.P., as amended.
10.1* Customer Agreement between the Partnership and Refco, Inc.
10.2* Form of Advisory Agreement between the General Partner and the Advisor.
10.3** Master Agreement between the Partnership and ING Derivatives, Ltd.,
dated as of March 22, 1995.
10.4*** Commodity Customer Agreement between the Partnership and Internationale
Nederlanden (U.S.) Derivatives Clearing, Inc.
10.5*** Netting Agreement and Customer Agreement between the Partnership and
Refco Capital Markets Ltd.
27 Financial Data Schedule
__________________
* Incorporated herein by reference to the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form 10, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
April 29, 1994.
** Incorporated herein by reference to the Partnership's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.
*** Incorporated herein by reference to the Partnership's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
The Partnership did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the fourth
quarter of 1995.
20
<PAGE> 23
ARTHUR F. BELL, JR. & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
(410) 821-8000
FAX (410) 321-8359
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Member: Heaver Plaza
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Suite 200
SEC Practice Section 1301 York Road
Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants Lutherville, Maryland 21093
</TABLE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
Kenmar Performance Partners L.P.
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of Kenmar
Performance Partners L.P. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, including the
December 31, 1996 schedule of securities, and the related statements of
operations and changes in partners' capital (net asset value) for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 1996
and 1995, by correspondence with brokers. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Kenmar Performance Partners
L.P. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and
the changes in its net asset values for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995
and 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/S/ ARTHUR F. BELL, JR. & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
March 11, 1997
F-1
<PAGE> 24
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31, 1996 and 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Equity in broker trading accounts
Cash $33,605,676 $33,373,562
Net option premiums (received) (444,673) (1,186,496)
Unrealized gain on open contracts 2,685,134 18,677,574
------------ ------------
Deposits with brokers 35,846,137 50,864,640
Cash and cash equivalents 9,047,700 28,353,208
Fixed income securities (cost of $73,923,849 and
$81,862,006, including accrued interest) 73,903,987 82,085,930
Subscriptions receivable 500,000 0
------------ ------------
Total assets $119,297,824 $161,303,778
============ ============
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $146,270 $73,031
Commissions and other trading fees
on open contracts 563,004 1,058,444
Management fees 286,256 341,349
Incentive fees 3,383,341 1,309,446
Redemptions payable 3,888,678 4,743,423
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 8,267,549 7,525,693
------------ ------------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (NET ASSET VALUE)
General Partner - 53.5807 units outstanding at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 785,756 762,603
Limited Partners - 7,517.5721 and 10,750.9076 units
outstanding at December 31, 1996 and 1995 110,244,519 153,015,482
------------ ------------
Total partners' capital
(Net Asset Value) 111,030,275 153,778,085
------------ ------------
$119,297,824 $161,303,778
============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-2
<PAGE> 25
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
SCHEDULE OF SECURITIES
December 31, 1996
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Face Value Description Value
- ---------- ------------------------------------------------------ -----------
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS
------------------------------------------------------
3,100,000 U.S. Treasury Bills, 8/21/97 $2,997,762
3,700,000 U.S. Treasury Bills, 11/13/97 3,530,984
2,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 6.00%, 5/31/98 2,016,175
800,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.875%, 4/30/98 809,298
550,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 6.25%, 7/31/98 567,911
11,825,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 6.125%, 8/31/98 12,116,768
3,675,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.875%, 10/31/98 3,711,390
4,330,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.00%, 2/15/99 4,333,273
1,760,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 6.375%, 5/15/99 1,789,686
3,435,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.875%, 11/15/99 3,447,771
FEDERAL AGENCY OBLIGATIONS
------------------------------------------------------
1,700,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Discount
Notes, 1/6/97 1,698,716
2,000,000 Federal Home Loan Bank Note, 5.99%, 2/9/98 2,045,994
2,000,000 Federal Home Loan Bank Debenture, 5.99%, 2/9/98 2,051,634
2,000,000 Federal Home Loan Bank Debenture, 5.87%, 2/13/98 2,046,263
2,000,000 Federal Home Loan Bank Debenture, 6.19%, 7/10/98 2,066,925
2,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Debenture,
9.40%, 8/10/98 2,178,633
2,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate
Note, currently 5.94%, 8/14/98 2,045,210
3,000,000 Federal Home Loan Bank Debenture, 5.99%, 8/27/98 3,064,717
2,000,000 Student Loan Marketing Association Floating Rate
Note, currently 7.723%, 1/25/99 2,131,953
5,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Debenture,
9.55%, 3/10/99 5,500,379
1,500,000 Federal Farm Credit Bank Floating Rate Note, currently
5.90%, 3/29/99 1,518,477
2,000,000 Federal Home Loan Bank Debenture, 6.31%, 5/17/99 2,025,424
1,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Debenture,
8.70%, 6/10/99 1,063,515
2,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Debenture,
6.60%, 6/24/99 2,032,247
2,000,000 Student Loan Marketing Association, 7.50%, 3/8/00 2,121,464
5,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate
Note, currently 5.55%, 1/17/01 4,991,418
-----------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
(COST, INCLUDING ACCRUED
INTEREST, - $73,923,849) $73,903,987
===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-3
<PAGE> 26
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
INCOME
Commodity trading gains (losses)
Realized $ 33,536,073 $30,252,139 $ 20,130,083
Change in unrealized (15,992,440) 3,424,071 (6,474,175)
------------ ----------- -------------
Gain from commodity trading 17,543,633 33,676,210 13,655,908
------------ ----------- -------------
Other trading gains (losses)
Realized 221,132 602,918 (211,390)
Change in unrealized (243,786) 250,962 (24,195)
------------ ----------- -------------
Gain (loss) from other trading (22,654) 853,880 (235,585)
------------ ----------- -------------
Interest income 5,974,118 7,735,524 5,967,053
------------ ----------- -------------
Total income 23,495,097 42,265,614 19,387,376
------------ ----------- -------------
EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions 15,904,878 17,165,519 20,007,803
Management fees 3,317,507 3,774,200 4,230,861
Incentive fees 6,405,660 7,106,694 5,900,006
General Partner management fees 0 0 785,915
General Partner administrative fee for
operating expenses 1,232,872 1,497,246 1,499,109
Cash management service charge 192,188 145,292 211,756
Legal expense 36,137 45,846 146,031
------------ ----------- -------------
Total expenses 27,089,242 29,734,797 32,781,481
------------ ----------- -------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (3,594,145) $12,530,817 $ (13,394,105)
============ =========== =============
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT
(based on weighted average number of
units outstanding during the year) $ (374.52) $ 1,104.32 $ (1,207.73)
============ =========== =============
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSET
VALUE PER UNIT $ 432.11 $ 1,068.33 $ (1,428.88)
============ =========== =============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-4
<PAGE> 27
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (NET ASSET VALUE)
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Partners' Capital
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Limited Total
---------------- ------------------- ---------------------
Units Amount Units Amount Units Amount
----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at
December 31, 1993 85.5679 $1,248,722 8,436.4153 $123,115,545 8,521.9832 $124,364,267
Net (loss) for the year
ended December 31, 1994 (139,289) (13,254,816) (13,394,105)
Additions 33.0786 449,877 5,437.1425 74,200,697 5,470.2211 74,650,574
Redemptions (66.3783) (871,226) (1,989.3014) (27,611,487) (2,055.6797) (28,482,713)
--------------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at
December 31, 1994 52.2682 688,084 11,884.2564 156,449,939 11,936.5246 157,138,023
Net income for the year
ended December 31, 1995 58,519 12,472,298 12,530,817
Additions 1.3125 16,000 2,347.5515 30,510,165 2,348.8640 30,526,165
Redemptions 0.0000 0 (3,480.9003) (46,416,920) (3,480.9003) (46,416,920)
--------------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at
December 31, 1995 53.5807 762,603 10,750.9076 153,015,482 10,804.4883 153,778,085
Net income (loss) for the year
ended December 31, 1996 23,153 (3,617,298) (3,594,145)
Additions 0.0000 0 881.1030 11,587,994 881.1030 11,587,994
Redemptions 0.0000 0 (4,114.4385) (50,741,659) (4,114.4385) (50,741,659)
--------------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at
December 31, 1996 53.5807 $ 785,756 7,517.5721 $110,244,519 7,571.1528 $111,030,275
=============== ========== ============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Net Asset Value Per Unit
--------------------------------------
December 31,
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
$14,664.91 $14,232.80 $13,164.47
========== ========== ==========
See accompanying notes.
F-5
<PAGE> 28
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. General Description of the Partnership
Kenmar Performance Partners L.P. (the Partnership) is a New York
limited partnership which operates as a commodity pool. It is
subject to the regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, an agency of the United States (U.S.) government which
regulates most aspects of the commodity futures industry, rules of
the National Futures Association, an industry self-regulatory
organization, and the requirements of commodity exchanges where the
Partnership executes transactions. Additionally, the Partnership is
subject to the requirements of Futures Commission Merchants and
interbank market makers (brokers) through which the Partnership
trades.
During 1994, the Partnership became a registrant with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. As a registrant, the Partnership is subject to the regulation
of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
B. Method of Reporting
The Partnership's financial statements are presented in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the use
of certain estimates made by the Partnership's management.
C. Commodities
Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated.
Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts (the difference between
contract purchase price and market price) at the date of the
statement of financial condition are included in equity in broker
trading accounts. Any change in net unrealized gain or loss from the
preceding period is reported in the statement of operations.
Brokerage commissions include other trading fees and are charged to
expense when contracts are opened.
D. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes short-term time deposits and cash
on deposit at financial institutions.
E. Fixed Income Securities
Fixed income securities are reported at market value plus accrued
interest. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade
date.
F-6
<PAGE> 29
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
-----------------------------------------------------------
(CONTINUED)
-----------
F. Income Taxes
The Partnership prepares calendar year U.S. and state information
tax returns and reports to the partners their allocable shares of
the Partnership's income, expenses and trading gains or losses.
G. Foreign Currency Transactions
The Partnership's functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however,
it transacts business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at
the date of the statement of financial condition. Income and
expense items denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar
are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect during the
period. Gains and losses resulting from the translation to U.S.
dollars are reported in income currently.
H. Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 1995 and 1994 financial statements were
reclassified to conform with the 1996 presentation.
Note 2. GENERAL PARTNER
---------------
The General Partner of the Partnership is Kenmar Advisory Corp., which
conducts and manages the business of the Partnership. The General
Partner is required by the Limited Partnership Agreement to maintain
an investment in the Partnership of 1% of the Net Asset Value, up to a
total of $500,000.
The General Partner received (for investments no longer held by the
Partnership after December 31, 1994) a monthly management fee of .5%
of the month-end allocated Net Asset Value of the Partnership's
investment with GK Capital Management, Inc. (Currency Program) and
Hollingsworth Trading Company. A portion of the brokerage commissions
paid by the Partnership to certain brokers is, in turn, paid by the
brokers to the General Partner.
F-7
<PAGE> 30
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 3. COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS
--------------------------
The Partnership has advisory agreements with various commodity trading
advisors, pursuant to which the Partnership pays monthly management
fees of 0% to 1/3 of 1% (4% annually) of the net asset value under
management (as defined in the advisory agreements) and quarterly
incentive fees of 15% to 25% of the profit subject to incentive fee
(as defined in the advisory agreements).
Note 4. DEPOSITS WITH BROKERS
---------------------
The Partnership deposits funds with brokers subject to Commodity
Futures Trading Commission regulations and various exchange and broker
requirements. Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of
cash with such brokers. The Partnership earns interest income on its
assets deposited with the brokers.
Note 5. OTHER EXPENSES
--------------
The General Partner pays all ordinary operating and administrative
expenses incurred by the Partnership. The Partnership pays the
General Partner a monthly administrative fee equal to 1/12 of 1% of
the prior month's beginning Net Asset Value of the Partnership. The
Partnership also pays actual amounts incurred in connection with
services performed by independent legal counsel.
Note 6. SUBSCRIPTIONS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND REDEMPTIONS
--------------------------------------------
Investments in the Partnership are made by subscription agreement,
subject to acceptance by the General Partner. The subscription price
is equal to the Net Asset Value of the units purchased, plus a 5%
selling commission, unless wholly or partly waived by the General
Partner. Additions to partners' capital are shown net of such
charges, which amounted to $37,702, $174,431 and $598,710 in 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively.
The Partnership is not required to distribute profits, but may do so
at the sole discretion of the General Partner. A Limited Partner may
request and receive redemption of units owned, subject to restrictions
in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
F-8
<PAGE> 31
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 7. TRADING ACTIVITIES AND RELATED RISKS
------------------------------------
The Partnership engages in the speculative trading of U.S. and foreign
futures contracts, options on U.S. and foreign futures contracts and
forward contracts (collectively, "derivatives"). These derivatives
include both financial and non-financial contracts held as part of a
diversified trading program. The Partnership is exposed to both
market risk, the risk arising from changes in the market value of the
contracts, and credit risk, the risk of failure by another party to
perform according to the terms of a contract.
Purchase and sale of futures and options on futures contracts requires
margin deposits with the brokers. Additional deposits may be
necessary for any loss on contract value. The Commodity Exchange Act
requires a broker to segregate all customer transactions and assets
from such broker's proprietary activities. A customer's cash and
other property (for example, U.S. Treasury bills) deposited with a
broker are considered commingled with all other customer funds subject
to the broker's segregation requirements. In the event of a broker's
insolvency, recovery may be limited to a pro rata share of segregated
funds available. It is possible that the recovered amount could be
less than total cash and other property deposited.
The Partnership has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit
with brokers and dealers in securities and other financial
institutions in connection with its trading of forward contracts and
its cash management activities. In the event of a financial
institution's insolvency, recovery of Partnership assets on deposit
may be limited to account insurance or other protection afforded such
deposits. In the normal course of business, the Partnership requires
collateral for repurchase agreements in excess of the face value of
such agreements. Since forward contracts are traded in unregulated
markets between principals, the Partnership also assumes the risk of
loss from counterparty nonperformance.
For derivatives, risks arise from changes in the market value of the
contracts. Theoretically, the Partnership is exposed to a market risk
equal to the value of futures and forward contracts purchased and
unlimited liability on such contracts sold short. As both a buyer and
seller of options, the Partnership pays or receives a premium at the
outset and then bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of
the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the
Partnership to potentially unlimited liability, and purchased options
expose the Partnership to a risk of loss limited to the premiums paid.
The fair value of derivatives represents unrealized gains and losses
on open futures and forward contracts and long and short options at
market value. The average fair value of derivatives during 1996 and
1995 was approximately $9,700,000 and $12,240,000, respectively, and
the related year end fair values are approximately $2,240,000 and
$17,491,000, respectively.
F-9
<PAGE> 32
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 7. TRADING ACTIVITIES AND RELATED RISKS (CONTINUED)
------------------------------------------------
Net trading results from derivatives for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 are reflected in the statement of
operations and equal gain from commodity trading less brokerage
commissions. Such trading results reflect the net gain (loss) arising
from the Partnership's speculative trading of futures contracts,
options on futures contracts and forward contracts.
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the notional amount of open contracts
is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
Contracts to Contracts to Contracts to Contracts to
Purchase Sell Purchase Sell
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Derivatives (excluding
purchased options) $1,805,000,000 $671,800,000 $2,621,900,000 $1,801,900,000
Purchased options 41,600,000 5,800,000 27,800,000 25,000,000
</TABLE>
The above amounts do not represent the Partnership's risk of loss due to
market and credit risk, but rather represent the Partnership's extent of
involvement in derivatives at the date of the statement of financial
condition.
The General Partner has established procedures to actively monitor and
minimize market and credit risk. The Limited Partners bear the risk of
loss only to the extent of the market value of their respective
investments and, in certain specific circumstances, distributions and
redemptions received.
F-10
<PAGE> 33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 28th day of
March, 1997.
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
By: Kenmar Advisory Corp., general partner
By: /s/ KENNETH A. SHEWER
---------------------
Kenneth A. Shewer
Chairman
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 28th day of March, 1997.
KENMAR PERFORMANCE PARTNERS L.P.
By: Kenmar Advisory Corp., general partner
By: /s/ KENNETH A. SHEWER
------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth A. Shewer
Chairman and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
By: /s/ MARC S. GOODMAN
------------------------------------------------------
Marc S. Goodman
President and Director
By: /s/ THOMAS J. DIVUOLO
-----------------------------------------------------
Thomas J. DiVuolo
Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer for the
Partnership)
<PAGE> 34
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------- -----------
<S> <C>
27 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 9,047,700
<SECURITIES> 73,903,987
<RECEIVABLES> 0
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 119,297,824
<PP&E> 0
<DEPRECIATION> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 119,297,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 8,267,549
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 119,297,824
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 23,495,097
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 27,089,242
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> (3,594,145)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (3,594,145)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (3,594,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (374.52)
<EPS-DILUTED> (374.52)
</TABLE>
