U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------------------
Form 10-K/A
(Mark One)
|x| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-27712
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
California 77-0309372
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
2221 Old Oakland Road 95131-1402
San Jose, California (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number including area code: (408) 321-3600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, no par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES [X] NO [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [_]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by persons other than
those who may be deemed affiliates of the Company as of March 19, 1998, was
approximately $11,200,000. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive
officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding
Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may under certain
circumstances be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of executive
officer or affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for
other purposes.
The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of
March 19, 1998 was 14,068,920.
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
Page
----
PART I
<S> <C>
Item 1. Business.................................................... 3
Item 2. Properties.................................................. 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 11
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 11
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters........................................ 12
Item 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 13
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations........................ 14
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 19
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreement with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure................................... 41
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant......... 42
Item 11. Executive Compensation..................................... 43
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management................................................. 47
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............. 48
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports
on Form 8-K................................................ 49
SIGNATURES................................................................ 51
</TABLE>
Page 2
<PAGE>
PART I
This Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Actual results could differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a
result of the risk related factors set forth herein.
Item 1. Business
Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation ("IPAC") is a leading
independent North American semiconductor packaging foundry. The Company
receives wafers from its customers and assembles each integrated circuit
in a protective plastic package. The Company's close proximity to its
customers and the end-users of its customers' products allows it to
provide quick turnaround design and prototype production and timely
delivery of products in high volume.
Industry Background
Semiconductor Manufacturing Process
The manufacture of semiconductors requires complex and precise
steps which can be broadly characterized as wafer fabrication, packaging
and testing. Wafer fabrication begins with raw silicon wafers and ends
with devices in the form of die on wafers. Since the die must be
packaged to protect them and facilitate their use in electronic systems,
the fabricated wafers are transferred to packaging facilities. The
packaging facility dices the wafer into individual die, and through a
series of processes connects wire leads to the die and encapsulates the
die in a protective casing. The packaged semiconductor die must then be
tested to ensure functionality before shipment for use.
Semiconductor companies in North America utilize various business
models for the design and manufacture of semiconductors. Certain
vertically integrated companies perform all stages of the manufacturing
process. Other companies outsource certain aspects of the manufacturing
process, including wafer fabrication and packaging. Wafers fabricated by
or for North American semiconductor companies are often tested in North
America and then shipped for packaging to captive or independent
packaging foundries in Asia. The packaged semiconductors are often
returned to North America for final test and distribution to customers.
The shipment to and from Asia for packaging can lengthen the
semiconductor manufacturing process significantly.
Semiconductor Packaging Market
The growth in the worldwide semiconductor market has created a
significant demand for semiconductor packaging capacity. Different types
of devices such as microprocessors, logic devices and memory devices
require different packaging solutions to accommodate different
requirements for heat dissipation and signal propagation. Semiconductor
packages are categorized largely by the technology employed to
interconnect the packaged circuits to printed circuit boards. Surface
mount technology ("SMT"), in which the leads on integrated circuits are
soldered to the surface of the printed circuit board, is a newer and more
advanced technology than pin through hole ("PTH") technology, in which
the leads are inserted into holes in the printed circuit board. SMT
allows components to be placed on both sides of the board, which permits
a higher degree of system integration, increases system performance and
reduces system cost.
The package types used to accommodate SMT include small outline
("SO") packages, quad flat packages ("QFP"), thin quad flat packages
("TQFP") and ball grid array ("BGA") packages. QFPs and TQFPs are
primarily used for logic devices, such as field programmable gate arrays
("FPGAs") and application specific integrated circuits ("ASICs"), which
have lead counts of up to 376 leads per device, while SO packages are
primarily used for memory and analog devices that have much lower lead
counts. BGA is an emerging packaging technology that can accommodate up
to 1,000 leads per device.
To meet their packaging requirements, semiconductor companies have
relied on captive or independent packaging foundries, principally located
in Asia. These packaging foundries were initially located in Asia in the
1970s to take advantage of low labor costs. Competition among
independent packaging foundries during this period was based largely on
price and the availability of capacity because the large feature sizes of
the semiconductors did not present significant technological challenges
Page 3
<PAGE>
or opportunities for differentiation among packaging techniques. During
the 1980s, semiconductor packaging commenced a transition from a labor
intensive operation to a capital intensive, technologically advanced
operation as packaging facilities were forced to automate to accommodate
significantly more complex devices while achieving consistency, quality
and reliability. These trends accelerated in the 1990s at the same time
that intense competition among semiconductor companies shortened product
life cycles for many devices. As a result, cycle time has become a
critical factor in the semiconductor packaging industry.
The Company believes that the use of independent packaging
foundries enables semiconductor companies to reduce costs and shorten
production cycles. By packaging a greater volume of semiconductors than
a given semiconductor company is likely to do internally, an independent
packaging foundry can reduce costs by employing technically advanced
equipment and by procuring raw materials more cost effectively. The use
of independent packaging foundries also enables semiconductor companies
to avoid the high cost of capital equipment required for advanced
semiconductor packaging. In addition, semiconductor companies are
realizing that the expertise of independent packaging foundries can be a
source for advanced packaging technologies that can satisfy their
requirements for miniaturization, high lead counts and thermal and
electrical performance.
Strategy
The Company's objective is to be the leading independent
semiconductor packaging foundry in North America. The principle elements
of the Company's strategy are set forth below.
Locate Facilities in North America Near Customers and End-Users
The Company's packaging facilities are located in San Jose,
California in close proximity to its customers and the end-users of its
customers' products. Due to intense competitive pressures in the
electronics industry, semiconductor companies are faced with increasingly
shorter product life cycles and therefore have a need to reduce the time
it takes to bring a product to market. The Company believes that its
close proximity to its customers promotes quicker turnaround design,
prototype production and final product delivery to its North American
customers, compared to its principal competitors which are all currently
located in Asia.
Provide High Quality Customer Service
The Company believes that the principle components of quality
customer service are time to market, reliability and quality. Since the
product life cycles of integrated circuits continue to contract, IPAC
offers short packaging cycles as a principal benefit to its customers.
In addition, the Company has established a quality control system that is
designed to enable it to maintain reliable services, high product quality
and high production yields. The Company also maintains a flexible
production capability which enables it to react quickly to changes in
customer requirements as well as industry developments.
Focus on Selected High Growth Markets
The Company focuses on QFPs, TQFPs and BGA packages which are used
for complex, high pin-count products, such as FPGAs and ASICS. The
Company expects QFPs, TQFPs and BGAs to be growth areas of the packaging
market, and generally command higher margins than most other packages.
Manufacturing
Semiconductor Packaging Services
The Company has focused on packages designed for assembly using
SMT. Within the SMT market, the Company focuses on high pin-count
packages, such as QFPs and TQFPS. The Company offers twelve different
QFP and TQFP families with body sizes ranging from 7x7 mm to 32x32 mm,
and with the number of leads available in certain package families
ranging from 44 to 376 leads. Integrated circuits packaged by the
Company are used in the following applications: personal computers,
modems, disk drives, automobiles, cameras and telecommunications, among
others. The Company also offers a limited number of packages for
emerging packaging technologies, such as BGA packages. Since inception,
QFPs and TQFPs have accounted for substantially all of the Company's
packaging revenues.
Packaging involves several manufacturing operations which are
highly automated to facilitate high volume production. The assembly
process begins with the mounting of a finished, tested wafer onto a
Page 4
<PAGE>
carrier. After a dicing saw cuts the wafer into individual die, the cut
wafer is moved to a die bonder which picks each good die off the wafer
and bonds it to a lead frame with epoxy resin. A lead frame is a
miniature sheet of metal, generally made of copper with selective silver
plating on which the pattern of input/output (I/0) leads has been cut.
Next, very fine (typically 0.001 inches in diameter) gold wires are
connected to the die and the leads through the use of automated machines
known as wire bonders. These wire leads provide the electrical path
necessary for the device to function. Each die is then encapsulated in a
plastic casing and marked. The leads protruding from the finished casing
are then plated with a tin and lead composition to permit the leads to be
connected to the printed circuit board. At the end of the packaging
process, the leads are trimmed and formed into requisite shapes. After
this packaging process is complete, the devices undergo final inspection
and are prepared for shipment.
The Company has expended substantial resources to significantly
expand its production capacity since inception. The Company shipped
approximately 1.6 million devices in 1994, approximately 10.5 million
devices in 1995, approximately 18.1 million devices in 1996 and
approximately 11.9 million devices in 1997. Since the fourth quarter of
1996, the Company has had available manufacturing capacity. The
Company's manufacturing capacity utilization is a function of the mix of
different package types produced by the Company at any one time and the
proportion of standard production runs compared to expedited production
runs. Thus, as the Company shifts its production among different package
types or allocates a different amount of available capacity to standard
production runs, the rate of the Company's capacity utilization changes,
at times significantly.
The Company believes that its competitive position depends on its
ability to have sufficient capacity to meet anticipated customer demand.
Accordingly, although the Company currently has available manufacturing
capacity, the Company is continuing to make significant investments to
expand such capacity, particularly through the acquisition of capital
equipment, including equipment for new packages (e.g. BGA) and an
advanced electroplating system and the training of new personnel. There
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to utilize such
capacity, that the cost of such expansion will not exceed management's
current estimates or that such capacity will not exceed the demand for
the Company's services. In addition, expansion of the Company's
manufacturing capacity will continue to significantly increase its fixed
costs, and the future profitability of the Company will depend on its
ability to utilize its manufacturing capacity in an effective manner.
The Company's inability to generate the additional production volume
necessary to fully utilize its capacity had a material adverse effect on
its business, financial and results of operation during 1997 and would
continue to have a material adverse effect on the Company's future
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The semiconductor packaging business is capital intensive and
requires a substantial amount of highly automated, expensive capital
equipment which is manufactured by a limited number of suppliers, many of
which are located in Asia or Europe. The Company's operations are
significantly dependent upon the Company's ability to obtain capital
equipment for its manufacturing operations in a timely manner. In this
regard, the Company spent $12.4 million in 1997 and expects to spend up
to $10.0 million to purchase capital equipment in 1998. The Company
currently purchases capital equipment from a limited group of suppliers
including Dai-Ichi Seiko Co., Ltd., ESEC SA and Kaijo Corporation. The
Company has no long term agreement with any such supplier and acquires
such equipment on a purchase order basis. The market for capital
equipment used in semiconductor packaging has been and is expected to
continue to be characterized by intense demand, limited supply and long
delivery cycles. The Company's dependence on such equipment suppliers
poses substantial risks. Should any of the Company's major suppliers be
unable or unwilling to provide the Company with high quality capital
equipment in amounts necessary to meet the Company's requirements, the
Company would experience severe difficulty locating alternative suppliers
in a timely fashion and its operations could be materially adversely
affected. In this regard, in the second half of 1996, the Company
experienced problems with the performance of certain capital equipment
which resulted in manufacturing inefficiencies. These equipment problems
had a material adverse effect on the Company's financial results in the
fourth quarter of 1996. Any further problems with such capital equipment
or any prolonged delay in equipment shipments by key suppliers or an
inability to locate alternative equipment suppliers could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations and could result in damage to customer
relationships. Moreover, increased levels of demand in the capital
equipment market may cause an increase in the price of equipment, further
lengthen delivery cycles and limit the ability of suppliers to adequately
service equipment following delivery, any of which could have an adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of
operations. In addition, adverse fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates, particularly the Japanese yen, could result in increased
prices for capital equipment purchased by the Company, which could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Page 5
<PAGE>
The Company currently outsources electroplating of the copper leads
protruding from the plastic moldings with a tin and lead composition from
International Lead Frame Corporation, a subsidiary of Mitsui High-Tec,
Inc., and Hytek Finishes, Inc. The Company has no long term agreement
with either supplier and such services are provided on a purchase order
basis. From time to time, the Company's plating subcontractors have
experienced significant manufacturing problems. In particular, such
problems resulted in delayed customer shipments by, and increased costs
to, the Company during the second and third quarters of 1995. There can
be no assurance that the Company's subcontractors will not experience
manufacturing problems in the future or that such problems will not
result in increased costs or production delays which could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition
and results of operations. The Company has purchased an advanced
electroplating system which has been installed at a leased facility in
Milpitas, California, approximately 2 miles from the Company's main
facility, which will be operated by the Company. The Company currently
expects its plating facility to be in operation in the second quarter of
1998, although there can be no assurance that equipment delivery delays
or other factors will not adversely impact such schedule.
Quality Control
The Company believes that total quality management is a vital
component of customer satisfaction and internal productivity. The
Company has established quality control systems which are designed to
maintain acceptable manufacturing yields at high volume production. The
Company has also developed a sophisticated proprietary software program
for material resource planning, shop floor control, work in process
tracking, statistical process control and product costing. The Company
obtained certification for its packaging operations pursuant to ISO 9002
in December 1996 and was recertified in 1997.
As of December 31, 1997, the Company's quality control staff
consisted of 10 engineers, technicians and other employees who monitor
the Company's design and production processes in order to ensure high
quality. These employees include line inspectors who work with members
of the production staff to conduct examination, testing and fine-tuning
of products during the production process. Quality control personnel are
involved from initial design to production. The quality control staff
also collects and analyzes data from various stages of the production
process which is used by the Company for statistical process control.
The semiconductor packaging process is complex and product quality
and reliability is subject to a wide variety of factors. Defective
packaging can result from a number of factors, including the level of
contaminants in the manufacturing environment, human error, equipment
malfunction, use of defective raw materials, defective plating services
and inadequate sample testing. From time to time, the Company has
experienced lower than anticipated production yields as a result of such
factors. For example, in the second half of 1996, the Company
identified a problem with certain elements of the manufacturing process
for lead frames which resulted in reduced yields for the affected
products and substantially reduced orders from a major customer which
adversely impacted the Company's operating results. The Company's
failure to maintain high quality production standards or acceptable
production yields would likely result in loss of customers, delays in
shipments, increased costs, cancellation of orders and product returns
for rework, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
The Company's packaging operations depend upon obtaining adequate
supplies of raw materials on a timely basis. The principal raw materials
used in the Company's packaging process are lead frames, gold wire and
molding compound. The semiconductors used by the Company are supplied by
its customer or the customer's wafer foundry; consequently, the Company
incurs no inventory costs relating to the silicon wafers used in its
packaging process. The Company does not maintain large inventories of
lead frames, gold wire or molding compound, and has from time to time
experienced difficulty in obtaining acceptable materials on a timely
basis.
The Company maintains a supplier quality program that includes
qualification, performance measurement and corrective action
requirements. The Company chooses its suppliers based on quality,
delivery, service and price. The Company sources most of its raw
materials, including critical materials such as lead frames and die
attach compound, from a limited group of suppliers, including Sumitomo
Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Dai Nippon Printing, Acqutek International and
Tokyo Printing Ink Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Molding compound, a critical
raw material, is obtained from Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd., a sole source
supplier. From time to time, vendors have extended lead times or limited
the supply of required materials to the Company because of vendor
capacity constraints and, consequently, the Company has experienced
difficulty in obtaining acceptable raw materials on a timely basis. In
addition, from time to time, the Company may reject materials from those
Page 6
<PAGE>
vendors that do not meet its specifications, resulting in declines in
output or yield. Any interruption in the availability or quality of
materials from these suppliers would materially adversely affect the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The
Company purchases all of its materials on a purchase order basis and has
no long term contracts with any of its suppliers. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to obtain sufficient quantities
of raw materials and other supplies. The Company's business financial
condition and results of operations would be materially adversely
affected if it were unable to obtain sufficient quantities of raw
materials and other supplies in a timely manner or if there were
significant increases in the costs of raw materials that the Company
could not pass on to its customers.
Marketing and Sales
The Company's marketing and sales efforts are focused on North
American semiconductor companies that design or manufacture IC devices
which are used in applications such as personal computers, modems, disk
drives and telecommunication products. Within such markets, the Company
emphasizes packaging complex, high pin-count products. The Company sells
its services directly through its sales and customer support
organization. The Company assists its customers in evaluating designs
with respect to manufacturability and when appropriate recommends design
changes to reduce manufacturing costs and lead times. The Company also
offers lead frame design services for a fee.
To date, the Company has been substantially dependent on a
relatively small number of customers. Specifically, Cirrus Logic, Intel
Corporation and Atmel accounted for 17%, 16% and 14% of the Company's
revenues in 1997. Cirrus Logic, Tseng Laboratories, and Intel Corporation
accounted for 32%, 17% and 14%, respectively, of the Company's revenues
in 1996. Cirrus Logic and Sierra Semiconductor accounted for 29% and 20%,
respectively, of the Company's revenues in 1995. The Company anticipates
that significant customer concentration will continue, although the
companies which constitute the Company's largest customers may change
from period to period.
All of the Company's customers operate in the cyclical
semiconductor business and their order levels may vary significantly from
period to period. In addition, there can be no assurance that such
customers or any other customers will continue to place orders with the
Company in the future at the same levels as in prior periods. There can
be no assurance that adverse developments in the semiconductor industry
will not adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations. The loss of one or more of the Company's
customers, or reduced orders by any of its key customers, would adversely
affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations. The Company ships its products in accordance with customer
purchase orders and upon receipt of semiconductor wafers from its
customers. The Company generally ships products within one to seven days
after receiving the customer's wafers, and, accordingly, the Company has
not, to date, had a material backlog of orders. The Company expects that
revenues in any quarter will be substantially dependent upon orders
received in that quarter. The Company's expense levels are based in part
on its expectations of future revenues and the Company may be unable to
adjust costs in a timely manner to compensate for any revenue shortfall.
Competition
The semiconductor packaging industry is highly competitive. The
Company currently faces substantial competition from established
packaging foundries located in Asia, such as Advanced Semiconductor
Assembly Technology in Hong Kong, Advanced Semiconductor Engineering,
Inc. in Taiwan, ANAM in Korea, PT Astra in Indonesia and Swire
Technologies in Hong Kong. Each of these companies has significantly
greater manufacturing capacity, financial resources, research and
development operations, marketing and other capabilities than the Company
and has been operating for a significantly longer period of time than the
Company. Such companies have also established relationships with many
large semiconductor companies which are current or potential customers of
the Company. The Company could face substantial competition from Asian
packaging foundries should one or more of such companies decide to
establish foundry operations in North America. The Company also faces
competition from other independent, North American packaging foundries.
The Company also competes against companies which have in-house packaging
capabilities as current and prospective customers constantly evaluate the
Company's capabilities against the merits of in-house packaging. Many of
the Company's customers are also customers of one or more of the
Company's principal competitors. The principal elements of competition
in the semiconductor packaging market include delivery cycle times,
price, product performance, quality, production yield, responsiveness and
flexibility, reliability and the ability to design and incorporate
product improvements. The Company believes it principally competes on
the basis of shorter delivery cycle times it can offer customers due to
the close proximity of its manufacturing facility to its customers'
Page 7
<PAGE>
operations and the end users of its customers' products.
Research and Development
The Company's research and development efforts are focused on
improving the efficiency and capabilities of its production processes,
and on developing new packages by making improvements upon commercially
available materials and technology. The Company's research and
development efforts are focused on improving existing technology, such as
developing thermally enhanced QFPs that result in better heat
dissipation, and emerging packaging technologies, such as BGA packages
that provide for an increased number of leads per device without
increasing the size of the functional integrated circuit. Although the
Company did not ship commercial quantities of BGA devices in 1997, it
believes that the increased pin count made available by BGA technology is
an important technology that will enable the Company to provide new
packaging services to its customers. The Company also works closely with
the manufacturers of its packaging equipment in designing and modifying
the equipment used in the Company's production process.
As of December 31, 1997, the Company employed 8 persons in research
and development activities. In addition, other management and
operational personnel are involved in research and development
activities. The Company supplements its research and development efforts
with alliances and technology licensing agreements. For example, the
Company is a member of an ARPA-TRP consortium working to enhance
cooperation and participation by United States companies in assembly and
packaging technology. In 1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company's research and
development expenses were approximately $1,276,000, $1,053,000 and
$694,000, respectively. The Company expects to continue to invest
significant resources in research and development.
The Company has focused its manufacturing resources on plastic QFPs
for use with SMT, and the Company has neither the capability nor the
intent to provide services to other substantial segments of the
semiconductor packaging market. For example, the Company has no capacity
to manufacture packages for use with PTH technology, nor does the Company
presently intend to manufacture packages using materials other than
plastic, such as ceramic. BGA packaging currently represents a very
small, but increasing, portion of the Company's overall revenues and a
relatively small portion of the overall semiconductor packaging market.
Technological change in the semiconductor packaging industry is
continuous and in the future semiconductor manufacturers are expected to
require increased technological and manufacturing expertise. The
introduction of new packaging technologies, a reduction or shift away
from QFP's, or the failure of the market for BGA packaging to develop
would result in a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Intellectual Property
The Company's success depends in part on its ability to obtain
patents and licenses and to preserve other intellectual property rights
relating to its manufacturing processes. As of December 31, 1997, the
Company held five U.S. patents which expire between 2012 and 2014, and
six additional patent applications have been filed and are pending. The
Company expects to continue to file patent applications when appropriate
to protect its proprietary technologies; however, the Company believes
that its continued success depends primarily on factors such as the
technological skills and innovation of its personnel rather than on its
patents. The process of seeking patent protection can be expensive and
time consuming. There can be no assurance that patents will issue from
pending or future applications or that, if patents are issued, they will
not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that rights granted
thereunder will provide meaningful protection or other commercial
advantage to the Company. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any
patent rights will be upheld in the future or that the Company will be
able to preserve any of its other intellectual property rights.
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, the Company may
receive communications from third parties asserting patents on certain of
the Company's technologies. The Company has received one such letter
from a competitor. However, in this case and in the event any other third
party were to make a valid claim and a license were not available on
commercially reasonable terms, the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected. Litigation, which could result in substantial cost to and
diversion of resources of the Company, may also be necessary to enforce
patents or other intellectual property rights of the Company or to defend
the Company against claimed infringement of the rights of others. The
failure to obtain necessary licenses or the occurrence of litigation
relating to patent infringement or other intellectual property matters
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Page 8
<PAGE>
Environmental Matters
The semiconductor packaging process involves a significant amount
of chemicals and gases which are subject to extensive governmental
regulations. For example, liquid waste is produced at the stage at which
silicon wafers are diced into chips with the aid of diamond saws and
cooled with running water. In addition, excess materials on leads and
moldings are removed from packaged semiconductors in the trim and form
process. The Company has installed equipment to collect certain solvents
used in connection with its manufacturing process and has contracted with
independent waste disposal companies to remove such hazardous material.
The Company has purchased an advanced electroplating system which
it installed at a leased facility in Milpitas, California which will be
operated by the Company. This plating operation will involve the use of
significant quantities of certain hazardous substances. Although the
Company has designed procedures to ensure such materials are handled in
compliance with applicable regulations, there can be no assurance that
the operation of such facility will not expose the Company to additional
costs in complying with environmental regulations or result in future
liability to the Company.
Federal, state and local regulations impose various controls on the
storage, handling, discharge and disposal of chemicals used in the
Company's manufacturing process and on the facility occupied by the
Company. The Company believes that its activities conform to present
environmental and land use regulations applicable to its operations and
its current facility. Increasing public attention has, however, been
focused on the environmental impact of semiconductor manufacturing
operations and the risk to neighbors of chemical releases from such
operations. There can be no assurance that applicable land use and
environmental regulations will not in the future impose the need for
additional capital equipment or other process requirements upon the
Company or restrict the Company's ability to expand its operations. The
adoption of new ordinances or similar measures or any failure by the
Company to comply with applicable environment and land use regulations or
to restrict the discharge of hazardous substances could subject the
Company to future liability or cause its manufacturing operations to be
curtailed or suspended.
Employees
As of December 31, 1997, the Company had 215 full time employees,
180 of whom were engaged in manufacturing, 8 in research and development,
8 in sales and customer service and 19 in finance and administration.
The Company's employees are not represented by any collective bargaining
agreement, and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage. The
Company believes that its employee relations are good. The success of
the Company's future operations depends in large part on the Company's
ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, manufacturing and
management personnel. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
successful in attracting and retaining key personnel.
Page 9
<PAGE>
Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company are as follows:
Name Age Position
- ---------------------------- ----- ---------------------------------------
Patrick Verderico............ 54 President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Ernest G. Barrieau II....... 42 Executive Vice President, Sales and
Marketing
Gerald K. Fehr.............. 60 Executive Vice President, Operations and
Chief Technology Officer
Alfred V. Larrenaga......... 50 Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
Patrick Verderico joined the Company in April 1997 as its Chief
Operating Officer and was appointed the Company's President and Chief
Executive Officer and a Director in July 1997. From 1996 to 1997, Mr.
Verderico was Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of
Maxtor Corporation, a disk drive manufacturer. From 1994 to 1996, Mr.
Verderico was Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Finance and
Administration of Creative Technology, a multi media products company.
From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Verderico was Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President Finance and Administration of Cypress Semiconductor. Prior to
1992, Mr. Verderico had various management positions in finance and
operations with Coopers & Lybrand, Philips Semiconductors and National
Semiconductor. Mr. Verderico is also a Director of Catalyst
Semiconductor and Micro Component Technology, Inc.
Ernest G. Barrieau joined the Company in October, 1997 as its
Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing. From 1996 to 1997, Mr.
Barrieau was Vice President North American Sales of Alphatec Group, a
semiconductor packaging company. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Barrieau was
Corporate Vice President World Wide Sales and Marketing, and Director of
Thai Micro Systems, a semiconductor packaging company. Prior to 1991, Mr.
Barrieau held various management positions in sales and operations with
Amkor Electronics and Fairchild Semiconductor.
Gerald K. Fehr is a co-founder of the Company and has served as
Vice President, Technology of the Company since March 1993 and Executive
Vice President, Operations and Chief Technology Officer since December
1997. From January 1991 to March 1993, Dr. Fehr served as an independent
consultant in the semiconductor packaging industry. From March 1981 to
January 1991, Dr. Fehr served as Director of Packaging and Assembly for
LSI Logic, Inc., a semiconductor company. From June 1978 to March 1981,
Dr. Fehr served as Manager of Packaging Operations of Burroughs, a
semiconductor company. From May 1975 to June 1978, Dr. Fehr served as
Manager of Packaging Operations of Fairchild, a semiconductor
corporation. From 1968 to 1975, Dr. Fehr served as Manager of Assembly
and Packaging for Intel Corporation.
Alfred V. Larrenaga joined the Company in August 1997 as Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer. From 1988 to 1997, Mr.
Larrenaga was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Southwall Technologies Inc., a thin film technology company. Prior to
1988, Mr. Larrenaga held various management positions in finance with
Asyst Technologies Inc., the Farinon Division of Harris Corporation and
Arthur Andersen & Co..
The Company's success depends to a significant extent upon the
continued service of its key management and technical personnel, each of
whom would be difficult to replace. The competition for qualified
employees is intense, and the loss of the services of key personnel or
the inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified new personnel
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Officers serve at the discretion of the Board and are appointed
annually. There are no family relationships between the directors or
officers of the Company.
Page 10
<PAGE>
Item 2. Properties
In January 1998, the Company sold its facility, which consisted of
land and two buildings comprising approximately 138,000 square feet, and
entered into a lease, with a initial term of ten years, for the
approximately 82,000 square foot building which it occupies and it uses
for its manufacturing operations, executive offices and product
development. In October 1997, the Company leased a separate 2,500 square
foot building, approximately 2 miles from the Company's main facility,
for its advanced electroplating system. The Company believes its existing
facilities are adequate to meet its needs for the foreseeable future.
Since the Company does not currently operate multiple facilities in
different geographic areas, a disruption of the Company's manufacturing
operations resulting from various factors, including sustained process
abnormalities, human error, government intervention or a natural disaster
such as fire, earthquake or flood, could cause the Company to cease or
limit its manufacturing operations and consequently would have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not Applicable.
Page 11
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
The Company effected the initial public offering of its Common
Stock on February 28, 1996. As of March 19, 1998, there were
approximately 1,500 beneficial owners of the Company's Common Stock. The
Company's Common Stock is listed for quotation in the Nasdaq National
Market under the Symbol "IPAC." The following table sets forth for the
periods indicated, the high and low prices of the Company's Common Stock
as quoted in the Nasdaq National Market.
High Low
-------- --------
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996:
First Quarter (from February 28, 1996).... $10 1/8 $7 1/2
Second Quarter............................ 14 1/2 5 1/2
Third Quarter............................. 10 1/4 7
Fourth Quarter............................ 10 1/4 7 1/2
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1997:
First Quarter............................. $ 8 1/2 $3 1/2
Second Quarter............................ 5 2 1/2
Third Quarter............................. 4 2
Fourth Quarter............................ 2 1/2 1/2
The trading price of the Company's Common Stock is expected to
continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarter-to-
quarter variations in operating results, announcements of technological
innovations or new products by the Company or its competitors, general
conditions in the semiconductor industry, changes in earnings estimates
or recommendations by analysts, the failure of the Company to meet or
exceed published earnings estimates or other events or factors. In
addition, the public stock markets have experienced extreme price and
trading volume volatility in recent months. This volatility has
significantly affected the market prices of securities of many high
technology companies for reasons frequently unrelated to the operating
performance of the specific companies. These broad market fluctuations
may adversely affect the market price of the Company's Common Stock.
The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock and
currently intends to retain any future earnings for use in its business.
Accordingly, the Company does not anticipate that any cash dividends
will be declared or paid on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future.
Page 12
<PAGE>
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31, (1)
--------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(In thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues................... $ -- $3,451 $20,764 $36,402 $19,744
Cost of revenues........... -- 3,438 15,627 28,840 24,089
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross profit (loss)........ -- 13 5,137 7,562 (4,345)
Operating expenses:........
Selling, general and
administrative.......... 777 1,309 2,229 3,488 5,167
Research and development.. 77 170 694 1,053 1,276
Provision for impairment
of assets............... -- -- -- -- 3,000
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating expense 854 1,479 2,923 4,541 9,443
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss)... (854) (1,466) 2,214 3,021 (13,788)
Interest and other income. 65 54 551 1,210 971
Interest expense.......... (42) (674) (1,074) (1,384) (2,185)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income
taxes.................... (831) (2,086) 1,691 2,847 (15,002)
Provision for income taxes. -- -- (141) (530) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss).......... ($831) ($2,086) $1,550 $2,317 $(15,002)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted net income (loss)
per share (1)............ ($0.34) ($1.02) $0.16 $0.16 ($1.08)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Number of shares used to
compute diluted per share
data (1)................. 2,476 2,051 9,603 14,157 13,898
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31, (2)
(In thousands)
-----------------------------------------------------
Pro
Forma
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997
(Unaudited)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital....... $2,325 $2,075 $4,773 $15,614 ($5,877) $1,854
Total assets.......... 7,476 13,310 28,260 69,639 55,482 50,631
Long-term obligations. 3,074 5,371 7,015 16,926 14,249 7,789
Mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred
stock............... 4,360 8,020 15,981 -- -- --
Total shareholders'
equity (deficit).... (809) (2,764) (918) 40,761 26,238 26,238
</TABLE>
(1) See Note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements for an explanantion of the
method used to determine shares used in computing per share amounts.
(2) The Pro Forma Unaudited Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 1997
reflects the sale of the Company's facilities on January 20, 1998, as
if the transaction had occurred on December 31, 1997, See Note 5 of
Notes to Financial Statements.
Page 13
<PAGE>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Overview
Founded in 1992, the Company commenced commercial production and
recognized its initial revenues in the quarter ended March 31, 1994. The
Company has derived substantially all of its revenues to date from QFPs.
The Company made significant investments in capital equipment and
facilities improvements in 1995, 1996 and 1997 by acquiring equipment
with a cost of $10.1 million, $18.5 million and $12.4 million,
respectively. In 1996, the Company spent an additional $9.2 million to
acquire the building complex in which it has operated since 1993. In
January 1998, the Company sold this complex (see Note 5 of Notes to
Financial Statements). The Company's capital expenditures in 1997
included equipment for new package types (e.g. BGA) and to establish an
advanced electroplating system.
As a result of a reduction in orders from the Company's customers,
the Company has significant excess production capacity. The reduction in
revenues and underutilization of capacity and resultant underabsorption
of fixed cost resulted in operating losses which have continued into
1998. As a result of the operating losses and cost of capital additions,
the Company believes that in addition to existing cash balances, it will
need additional financing in the second quarter of 1998 to meet its
projected working capital and other cash requirements through 1998. The
Report of Independent Accountants on page 20 contains a going concern
statement.
The Company's operating results are affected by a wide variety of
factors that could materially and adversely affect revenues, gross profit
and operating income. These factors include the short-term nature of its
customers' commitments, timing and volume of orders relative to the
Company's production capacity, long lead times for the manufacturing
equipment required by the Company, evolutions in the life cycles of
customers' products, timing of expenditures in anticipation of future
orders, lack of a meaningful backlog, effectiveness in managing
production processes, changes in costs and availability of labor, raw
materials and components, costs to obtain materials on an expedited
basis, mix of orders filled, the impact of price competition on the
Company's average selling prices and changes in economic conditions.
Unfavorable changes in any of the above factors have in the past and may
in the future adversely affect the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The Company's business is substantially affected by market
conditions in the semiconductor industry, which is highly cyclical and,
at various times, has been subject to significant economic downturns and
characterized by reduced product demand, rapid erosion of average selling
prices and production over capacity. In addition, the markets for
integrated circuits are characterized by rapid technological change,
evolving industry standards, intense competition and fluctuations in end-
user demand. Since the Company' s business is entirely dependent on the
requirements of semiconductor companies for independent packaging
foundries, any future downturn in the semiconductor industry is expected
to have an adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition
and results of operations. In this regard, in 1997, the Company's
results of operations were materially adversely effected by reduced
orders from several major customers in the P.C. graphics segment of the
semiconductor industry due to decreased demand for such products.
The Company has recently experienced a decline in the average
selling prices for its services and expects that average selling prices
for its services may decline in the future, principally due to intense
competitive conditions. A decline in average selling prices of the
Company's services, if not offset by reductions in the cost of performing
those services, would decrease the Company's gross margins and could
materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to reduce its cost per unit
The Company must continue to hire and train significant numbers of
additional personnel to operate the highly complex capital equipment
required by its manufacturing operations. There can be no assurance that
the Company will be able to hire and properly train sufficient numbers of
qualified personnel or to effectively manage such growth and its failure
to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, since the
Company's expense levels are based in part on anticipated future revenue
levels, if revenue were to fall below anticipated levels, the Company's
operating results would be materially adversely affected.
Page 14
<PAGE>
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain
items in the Company's statement of operations as a percentage of
revenues:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues................................ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of revenues........................ 75.3 79.2 122.0
--------- --------- ---------
Gross profit (loss)..................... 24.7 20.8 (22.0)
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative... 10.7 9.6 26.2
Research and development.............. 3.3 2.9 6.4
Provision for impairment of assets.... -- -- 15.2
--------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses............ 14.0 12.5 47.8
--------- --------- ---------
Operating income (loss)................. 10.7 8.3 (69.8)
Interest and other income............... 2.7 3.3 4.9
Interest expense........................ (5.2) (3.8) (11.1)
--------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes....... 8.2 7.8 (76.0)
Provision for income taxes.............. (0.7) (1.4) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss)....................... 7.5% 6.4% (76.0)%
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
Revenues
The Company recognizes revenues upon shipment of products to its
customers. Revenues decreased 46% to $19.7 million in 1997, from $36.4
million in 1996. Revenues increased 75% to $36.4 million in 1996, from
$20.8 million in 1995. In 1996, six customers accounted for
approximately 75% of the Company's revenues. The decrease in 1997
revenues was primarily due to lower orders from four of these customers,
coupled with operational problems in quality and delivery. Revenues by
quarter for 1997 were $5.6 million in the first quarter, $4.0 million in
the second quarter, $4.2 million in the third quarter and $6.0 million in
the fourth quarter. The growth in 1996 revenues reflected increased order
levels from the Company's three largest customers and revenues earned
from the Company's thermally enhanced packages. The largest portion of
the 1996 revenue growth occurred during the first three quarters and
revenues declined in the fourth quarter as a result of reduced orders
from one of the Company's largest customers, and from quality problems
with respect to certain raw materials and capital equipment.
Gross Profit (Loss)
Cost of revenues includes materials, labor, depreciation and
overhead costs associated with semiconductor packaging. Gross profit
(loss) decreased to $(4.3) million in 1997. Gross profit (loss) increased
to $7.6 million in 1996, from $5.1 million in 1995. Gross profit (loss)
as a percentage of revenues, or gross margin, was (22.0%) in 1997
compared to 20.8% in 1996 and 24.7% in 1995.
In 1997, as a result in the reduction in orders from major
customers, the Company had significant excess production capacity
throughout the year. This underutilization and resultant underabsorption
of fixed costs, along with a decrease in average selling prices, resulted
in a negative gross profit margin in 1997. In 1996, the Company incurred
higher labor and manufacturing overhead expenses from adding
manufacturing personnel and infrastructure, which reduced its gross
margin. In the fourth quarter of 1996, gross margins were also adversely
affected by a drop in average selling prices, caused by industry
competition.
Depreciation for certain production machinery and equipment
acquired prior to 1997 is calculated using the units of production
method, in which depreciation is calculated based upon the units produced
in a given period divided by the estimate of total units to be produced
over its life following commencement of use. Such estimate is reassessed
when facts and circumstances suggest a revision may be necessary. Based
upon reduced utilization of machinery and equipment in relation to plan,
the estimate for total throughput was reduced in late 1996 causing the
depreciation rate per unit to increase in late 1996. Such higher
Page 15
<PAGE>
depreciation rate continued into 1997 and will continue until the assets
are fully depreciated. In all cases, the asset will be fully depreciated
by the end of its estimated six year life. Compared with straight line
depreciation, the units of production method generally results in lower
depreciation expense during the early life of the equipment and
relatively higher depreciation expense once the equipment is in full
production. All machinery and equipment acquired after 1996 is
depreciated using the straight line depreciation method.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
costs associated with sales, customer service, finance, administration
and management personnel, as well as advertising, public relations, legal
and facilities costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$5.2 million in 1997, $3.5 million in 1996, and $2.2 million in 1995.
These increases were due primarily to increases in staff, marketing
efforts, and facilities to support the Company's expansion.
As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative
expenses increased to 26.2% in 1997 compared to 9.6% in 1996 and 10.7% in
1995. The fluctuation in percentages reflects the increase in absolute
spending and the reduced revenue base. The Company anticipates that its
selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to increase in
absolute dollars in future periods, although such expenses may fluctuate
as a percentage of revenues.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of the costs
associated with research and development personnel, the cost of related
materials and services, and the depreciation of development equipment.
Research and development expenses were $1.3 million in 1997, $1.1 million
in 1996 and $0.7 million in 1995. The increases in 1997 and 1996 were due
primarily to the Company's expanded efforts in developing BGA, chip scale
and thermally enhanced packages.
As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses
increased to 6.4% in 1997 compared to 2.9% in 1996 and 3.3% in 1995.
The changes in such expenses as a percentage of revenues reflected,
primarily, the reduced revenue base.
Provision for Impairment of Assets
For the quarter ended June 30, 1997, the Company took a $3 million
charge for impaired assets. This charge included a $2.4 million reserve
related to equipment used for the production of certain products with
limited future demand, and a $500,000 reserve for the cancellation of
purchase orders for equipment which the Company has determined to be
surplus in relation to current demand.
Interest and Other Income
Interest income in 1997, 1996, and 1995 was $573,000, $982,000 and
$209,000, respectively. The reduction in interest income for 1997 was due
to lower investment balances, which resulted from the loss from
operations and capital expenditures. The increase in interest income for
1996, was the result of interest earned on proceeds from the Company's
initial public offering which was completed in February 1996. In 1997 and
1996, other income included $124,000 and $228,000, which was earned for
development work with a semiconductor industry consortium. In 1997,
other income also included approximately $270,000 from the sublease of a
portion of the Company's facilities complex. In 1995, other income
consisted of $342,000 earned for development work, of which $318,000 was
earned from participation in a semiconductor industry consortium.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists primarily of interest payable on capital
leases and term loans secured by equipment. The Company has financed its
manufacturing equipment primarily through capital leases and term loans
secured by equipment with terms ranging from four to five years, and
carrying imputed interest rates ranging from 7.5% to 15.5% per annum.
Interest expense for 1997, 1996, and 1995 was $2.2 million, $1.4 million
and $1.1 million, respectively.
Page 16
<PAGE>
Provision for Income Taxes
In 1997, due to the loss from operations, the Company recorded no
tax provision. The Company's provision for taxes in 1996 was $530,000,
representing an effective tax rate of approximately 19%. The effective
tax rate represents alternative minimum tax ("AMT") resulting from limits
on the use of net operating loss carry forwards for AMT purposes and tax
accelerated depreciation on all machinery and equipment. The Company's
provision for taxes in 1995 was $141,000, representing an effective tax
rate of approximately 8%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Prior to its initial public offering in February 1996, the Company
satisfied its liquidity needs principally from the sale of Preferred
Stock, equipment financing through leases and equipment secured term
loans, and to a lesser extent, cash flow from operations. Prior to its
initial public offering, the Company raised approximately $16 million
from issuance of Preferred Stock, $7.8 million from equipment financing,
and $4.9 million from term loans. The Company completed its initial
public offering in February 1996. Net proceeds from this offering were
$23.1 million and were the primary source of the Company's liquidity for
1996 and 1997.
In 1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company entered into borrowing
facilities with a number of lenders, allowing the Company to finance 70%
to 80% of the cost of collateralized machinery and equipment. Borrowings
under these facilities accrued interest at rates ranging from 7.75% to
14.0% with terms ranging from 36 to 48 months. The Company borrowed an
aggregate of $3.5 million, $9.8 million and $4.9 million through these
facilities in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. At December 31, 1997,
the aggregate principal amount outstanding under all equipment loans was
$12.1 million. Certain of the credit facilities require the Company to
maintain certain financial covenants including minimum tangible net
worth, a ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth, and quarterly
revenues and quarterly income before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA). At December 31, 1997 and 1996, the Company was in
compliance with such covenants.
In March 1997, the Company secured a mortgage loan with an
insurance company, which provided the Company with a $6.7 million five
year term loan. The loan was secured by the real estate and buildings
purchased by the Company in December 1996. The loan accrued interest at
8.5%, and was payable in equal monthly installments of $58,000, with a
balloon payment of $5.9 million due after five years. The proceeds of
this mortgage loan were used to pay off and retire the $6.5 million real
estate loan which was entered into in December 1996 to provide temporary
financing for the acquisition of the Company's building complex. The
loan accrued interest at 2.25% over the rate for 30 day certificates of
deposit and was collateralized by a certificate of deposit of equivalent
value.
In December 1997, the Company entered into a line of credit
agreement with a bank which provides, through December 1998, for
borrowings up to the lesser of $5,000,000 or 80% of eligible accounts
receivable. At December 31, 1997, no amounts were outstanding under this
line of credit. Borrowings under the line of credit accrue interest at
the bank's prime rate (8.5% at December 31, 1997) plus 1.25% and are
collateralized by the assets of the Company. The agreement requires the
Company to maintain certain financial covenants, including a liquidity
ratio, minimum tangible net worth, maximum debt to tangible net worth,
quarterly profitability and prohibits the Company from the payment of
dividends without prior approval by the bank. At December 31, 1997, the
Company was in compliance with such covenants.
In January 1998, the Company sold its facility, which consisted of
land and two buildings totaling approximately 138,000 square feet and
leased the 82,390 square foot building that it occupies. This sale
netted the Company $7.3 million in cash and eliminated $6.6 million of
mortgage debt. The effect of this transaction as if it had occurred on
December 31, 1997, is shown as "Pro Forma 1997 (Unaudited)" on the
Balance Sheet. See Note 5 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Capital additions totaled approximately $12.4 million,
$27.7 million and $10.1 million in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
The $27.7 million of capital additions in 1996 was comprised of
$9.2 million for the acquisition of the building complex the Company
acquired in December 1996, and $18.5 million for equipment and facilities
improvements. The building complex was sold in January 1998. The Company
currently expects to spend up to $10 million for production equipment and
facilities improvements in 1998, of which the Company currently has
commitments for approximately $6.1 million. The Company currently plans
to borrow approximately $7 to $10 million through equipment secured
borrowings to finance 1998 acquisitions. However, the Company currently
does not have commitments with respect to such financing and there can be
no assurance that such financing will be available on terms acceptable to
the Company, if at all. Further, it is unlikely that the Company will be
able to secure substantial additional equipment financing prior to
infusion of equity capital.
Page 17
<PAGE>
The Company is currently seeking additional equity financing to
address its working capital needs and to provide funding for capital
expenditures. There can be no assurances, however, that financing will
be available on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. If
additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities,
the percentage ownership of the Company's stockholders will be diluted
and such equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges
senior to those of the holders of the Company's Common Stock. There can
be no assurance that additional financing will be available or that, if
available, such financing will include terms favorable to the Company or
its shareholders. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable
terms, the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations would be materially adversely effected. In such event, the
Company would be required to substantially curtail its operations and
reorganize its current indebtedness.
The Company is subject to certain financial covenants under its
borrowing facilities including minimum revenues and EBITDA, on a
quarterly basis. In the event future revenue and income levels do not
increase, it is likely that the Company would be out of compliance with
certain of its financial covenants during 1998. In this event, the
Company anticipates receipt of a waivers of the covenants in default from
the respective financial institutions. If the waivers were not received,
certain debt would become currently due and payable and the line of
credit would no longer be available for use.
Year 2000 Issue
There is a risk to the Company from unforeseen problems related to
the "Year 2000 issue". The "Year 2000 issue" arises because most
computer systems and programs were designed to handle only a two-digit
year, not a four-digit year. When Year 2000 begins, these computers may
interpret "00" as the year 1900 and could either stop processing date-
related computations or could process them incorrectly. The Company has
recently performed an initial assessment of its information systems and
does not anticipate any internal Year 2000 issues from its own
information systems, databases or programs. However, the Company could
be adversely impacted by Year 2000 issues faced by major suppliers,
customers, vendors, and financial service organizations with which the
Company interacts. The Company is in the process of developing a plan to
determine the impact that third parties who are not Year 2000 compliant
may have on the operations of the Company.
Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk - The Company does not use derivative financial
instruments in its investment portfolio. At December 31, 1997, the
Company's investment portfolio is comprised of highly liquid securities
that mature within 90 days. The Company places investments in
instruments that meet high credit quality standards. These securities
are subject to interest rate risk, and could decline in value if interest
rates fluctuate. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of
the Company's investment portfolio, the Company does not expect any
material loss with respect to its investment portfolio.
The Company has various debt instruments outstanding that mature by
2002. Certain of these instruments have interest rates that are based on
associated rates that may fluctuate over time based on economic changes
in the environment, such as LIBOR and the Prime Rate. The Company is
subject to interest rate risk, and could be subjected to increased
interest payments if market interest rates fluctuate. The Company does
not expect any changes in such interest rates to have a material adverse
effect on the Company's results from operations.
Page 18
<PAGE>
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Financial Statements:
Page
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants............................... 20
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1996 and 1997.................. 21
Statement of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 1995,
1996 and 1997................................................. 22
Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997.............................. 23
Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1995,
1996 and 1997................................................. 24
Notes to Financial Statements................................... 25
</TABLE>
Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the financial statements or notes
thereto.
Page 19
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation
In our opinion, the financial statements listed in the accompanying
index on page 19 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation at December 31,
1996 and 1997, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management;
our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
the opinion expressed above.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to
the financial statements, the Company has suffered recent losses from
operations and cash and available financing facilities may not be
sufficient to fund the Company's operations, capital commitments and
debt service requirements for the next year. Management's plans in
regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainity.
Price Waterhouse LLP
San Jose, California
January 27, 1998
Page 20
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-----------------------------
Pro Forma
(Unaudited)
1996 1997 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.................. $15,817 $2,928 $10,240
Short term investments..................... 3,025 -- --
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
for doubtful accounts of $145 and $263.... 6,141 3,096 3,096
Inventory.................................. 1,977 2,337 2,337
Prepaid expenses and other current assets.. 606 757 757
--------- --------- ---------
Total current assets..................... 27,566 9,118 16,430
Property and equipment, net.................. 41,776 46,127 34,110
Other assets................................. 297 237 91
--------- --------- ---------
Total assets............................... $69,639 $55,482 $50,631
========= ========= =========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of notes payable........... $3,893 $4,576 $4,435
Current portion of capital lease
obligations............................... 2,225 1,972 1,972
Accounts payable........................... 2,534 5,478 5,478
Accrued expenses and other liabilities..... 3,300 2,969 2,691
--------- --------- ---------
Total current liabilities................ 11,952 14,995 14,576
--------- --------- ---------
Long term portion of notes payable........... 15,155 14,166 7,706
--------- --------- ---------
Long term portion of capital lease
obligations................................. 1,771 83 83
--------- --------- ---------
Deferred gain on sale of facilities.......... -- -- 2,028
Commitments and contingencies --------- --------- ---------
(notes 4, 5 and 10)
Shareholders' equity
Common Stock, no par value, 75,000,000
shares authorized; 13,862,342 and
13,828,348 shares issued and
outstanding............................... 39,811 40,290 40,290
Accumulated earnings (deficit)............... 950 (14,052) (14,052)
--------- --------- ---------
Total shareholders' equity .................. 40,761 26,238 26,238
--------- --------- ---------
Total liabilities and shareholders'
equity ................................... $69,639 $55,482 $50,631
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Page 21
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues................................ $20,764 $36,402 $19,744
Cost of revenues........................ 15,627 28,840 24,089
--------- --------- ---------
Gross profit (loss)..................... 5,137 7,562 (4,345)
--------- --------- ---------
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative... 2,229 3,488 5,167
Research and development.............. 694 1,053 1,276
Provision for impairment of assets.... -- -- 3,000
--------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses............ 2,923 4,541 9,443
--------- --------- ---------
Operating income (loss)................. 2,214 3,021 (13,788)
Interest and other income............... 551 1,210 971
Interest expense........................ (1,074) (1,384) (2,185)
--------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes....... 1,691 2,847 (15,002)
Provision for income taxes.............. (141) (530) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss)....................... $1,550 $2,317 ($15,002)
========= ========= =========
Per share data:
Net income (loss) per share
Basic............................... $0.77 $0.20 ($1.08)
========= ========= =========
Diluted............................. $0.16 $0.16 ($1.08)
========= ========= =========
Number of shares used to compute per
share data 2,018 11,730 13,898
Basic................................. ========= ========= =========
Diluted............................... 9,603 14,157 13,898
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Page 22
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Accumulated
--------------------- Earnings
Shares Amount (Deficit) Totals
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994... 1,933 $153 ($2,917) ($2,764)
Common stock issued under
stock plans.................. 597 125 -- 125
Issuance of warrants........... -- 144 -- 144
Amortization of deferred
compensation................. -- 27 -- 27
Net income..................... -- -- 1,550 1,550
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995... 2,530 449 (1,367) (918)
Sale of common stock, net of
issuance costs of $935....... 3,450 23,111 -- 23,111
Conversion of Mandatorily
Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock into Common
Stock........................ 7,862 15,981 -- 15,981
Common stock issued under
stock plans.................. 93 182 -- 182
Common stock repurchased
under stock plans............ (73) (17) -- (17)
Issuance of warrants........... -- 57 -- 57
Amortization of deferred
compensation................. -- 48 -- 48
Net income..................... -- -- 2,317 2,317
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996... 13,862 39,811 950 40,761
Common stock issued under
stock plans.................. 127 352 -- 352
Common stock repurchased
under stock plans............ (161) (15) -- (15)
Issuance of warrants........... -- 94 -- 94
Amortization of deferred
compensation................. -- 48 -- 48
Net income (loss).............. -- -- (15,002) (15,002)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1997... 13,828 $40,290 ($14,052) $26,238
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Page 23
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
INCREASE (DECREASE) CASH
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)............................... $1,550 $2,317 ($15,002)
ADJUSTMENTS:
Depreciation and amortization................... 1,541 3,316 6,426
Write down of impaired assets................... -- -- 3,000
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable........................... (2,061) (3,238) 3,045
Inventory..................................... (1,382) 164 (360)
Prepaid expenses and other assets............. (415) (161) (320)
Accounts payable.............................. 953 679 2,944
Accrued expenses and other liabilities........ 950 1,921 (1,369)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating --------- --------- ---------
activities.................................. 1,136 4,998 (1,636)
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of property and equipment........... (10,126) (27,744) (12,351)
Purchase of short-term investments.............. -- (25,025) --
Sale & redemption of short-term investments..... -- 22,000 3,025
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities......... (10,126) (30,769) (9,326)
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
Payments under capital lease obligations........ (1,358) (1,593) (1,958)
Principal payments on note payable.............. (234) (1,819) (10,506)
Proceeds from note payable...................... 4,890 16,300 10,200
Proceeds from issuance of Mandatorily
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock......... 7,961 -- --
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net..... 125 23,276 337
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities.................................. 11,384 36,164 (1,927)
--------- --------- ---------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH................. 2,394 10,393 (12,889)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period........................................ 3,030 5,424 15,817
--------- --------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD...... $5,424 $15,817 $2,928
========= ========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest.......................... $1,008 $1,240 $2,074
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of equipment under capital leases... $40 $147 --
Issuance of warrants............................ $144 $57 $94
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Page 24
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1-THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation (the "Company"), an
independent semiconductor packaging foundry, was incorporated in
California on April 28, 1992 and reincorporated in Delaware on June 19,
1997. The Company assembles and packages integrated circuits from wafers
consigned by its customers. The Company's focus is on quad flat
packages ("QFP's"), thin quad flat packages ("TQFP's"), and ball grid
array packages ("BGA's"), which are used in complex integrated circuits
with high pin-counts in the personal computer and telecommunications
industries.
Basis of Presentation
As a result of a reduction in orders from the Company's customers, the
Company has significant excess production capacity. The reduction in
revenues and underutilization of capacity and resultant underabsorption
of fixed costs resulted in operating losses which have continued into
1998. As a result of the operating losses and cost of capital
additions, the Company believes that in addition to existing cash
balances, it will need additional financing to meet its projected
working capital and other cash requirements through 1998. While there
can be no assurance that the Company can obtain such financing when
needed, the Company has taken actions to improve liquidity.
In December 1997, the Company entered into a Line of Credit Agreement
with a bank which could provide up to $5 million of additional borrowing
availability to the Company. See Note 5.
In January 1998, the Company sold its facility which consisted of land
and two buildings. Net proceeds from the sale of the facility were $7.3
million, net of the elimination of $6.6 million of mortgage debt, fees,
commissions and closing costs.
However, due to anticipated cash requirements during the first quarter
of 1998, including capital expenditures, debt service costs and an
expected loss from operations, the Company needs to secure additional
financing in the second quarter to fund continuing operations.
The Company is attempting to secure additional financing that would
provide incremental borrowing. Additionally, the Company is reviewing
various proposals to maximize stockholder value, including potential
equity infusions and other financing transactions. The Company is
conducting discussions with interested parties. However, no definitive
agreements, terms or structures have been reached, and there are no
assurances that any transactions will be consummated. Further, it is
unlikely that the Company will be able to secure substantial additional
equipment financing prior to the infusion of equity capital. If the
Company is unable to secure additional financial resources and operating
losses continue, there could be a material adverse impact on the
Company's financial position and results of operations, and the Company
would be required to substantially curtail its operations and reorganize
its current indebtedness.
These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis
and, therefore, do not include any adjustment that might result from
these uncertainties.
Page 25
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fiscal year
In 1997, the Company changed its fiscal year end to December 31.
Prior to 1997, the Company's fiscal quarters and year ended on the
Sunday nearest the calendar quarter end and December 31, respectively.
For purposes of financial statement presentation, each fiscal year is
presented as having ended on December 31 and each fiscal quarter is
presented as having ended on the calendar quarter end. Fiscal years 1995
and 1996 each consisted of 52 weeks or 364 days. Fiscal 1997 consisted
of 367 days. The effect of these three additional days in 1997 on
revenues and net loss was insignificant.
Pro Forma Unaudited Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997
In January 1998, the Company sold its facilities and entered into a
lease for the building that it occupies. The Pro Forma 1997 Unaudited
Balance Sheet reflects this transaction as if it had occurred on
December 31, 1997. See Note 5.
Cash equivalents and short term investments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with
an initial maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents, and
investments with original maturities of greater than 90 days to be short
term investments. As of December 31, 1997, $1.1 million of the
Company's cash and cash equivalents were restricted as collateral for
letters of credit issued during 1997 for the purchase of equipment. As
of December 31, 1996, the Company had short term investments primarily
comprised of fixed maturity securities of $3.0 million all of which
have been classified as available for sale and have contractual
maturities of less than one year. These securities are stated at fair
market value. Unrealized gains and losses were immaterial at December
31, 1996.
Inventory
Inventory, which primarily consists of raw material supplies such as
gold wire, lead frames and mold compound, is stated at the lower of
cost, determined by the first-in, first-out basis, or market. The
Company holds product on consignment from its customers while services
are being performed.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. For certain production
machinery and equipment acquired prior to 1997, depreciation is
calculated using the units of production method, in which depreciation
is calculated based upon the units produced in a given period divided by
the estimate of total units to be produced over its life following
commencement of use. Such estimate is reassessed when facts and
circumstances suggest a revision may be necessary. In all cases the
asset will be fully depreciated by the end of its estimated six-year
life. In late 1996, due to lower than expected utilization, the Company
reduced its estimates of the number of units to be produced over the
useful equipment life. Accordingly, the depreciation rate per unit was
increased and was not material to 1996 results. The higher rate
continued into 1997 and will continue until the assets are fully
depreciated. Depreciation for all other property and equipment and all
production machinery and equipment acquired after 1996 is computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets,
generally 3 to 6 years.
Page 26
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In December 1996, the Company acquired a real estate parcel and
facilities, including the building that it had operated in since 1993
for $9.2 million. The Company has allocated its purchase cost between
land, buildings and improvements in proportion to fair market value.
The building was depreciated over 30 years, with building improvements
depreciated over 5 to 15 years. In January 1998, the real estate parcel
and buildings on the parcel were sold and the Company entered into a
lease for the building that it occupies. See Note 5.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is generally recognized upon shipment. A provision for
estimated future returns is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability
approach which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have
been recognized in the Company's financial statements or income tax
returns. In estimating future tax consequences, the Company generally
considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in
the tax law or rates.
Stock options
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees". Accordingly, compensation for stock options is generally
measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the
Company's stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee
must pay to acquire the stock. In January 1996, the Company adopted the
disclosure only requirements of SFAS 123.
Net income (loss) per share
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS 128") during the fourth quarter of
1997. This statement simplifies the standards for computing earnings
per share (EPS) previously defined in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 15, "Earnings Per Share." All prior-period earnings per
share data has been restated in accordance with SFAS 128. SFAS 128
requires presentation of both Basic EPS and Diluted EPS on the face of
the Statement of Operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator)
during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential
common shares outstanding during the period including stock options and
warrants, using the treasury stock method, and convertible preferred
stock, using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the
average stock for the period is used in determining the number of shares
assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options and warrants.
Page 27
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator
of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations under SFAS 128:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share data) Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Basic EPS Computation:
Net income (loss)......................... $1,550 $2,317 ($15,002)
========= ========= =========
Weighted-average common shares outstanding 2,018 11,730 13,898
========= ========= =========
Basic earnings (loss) per share........... $0.77 $0.20 ($1.08)
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Diluted EPS Computation:
Net income (loss)......................... $1,550 $2,317 ($15,002)
========= ========= =========
Weighted-average common shares outstanding 2,018 11,730 13,898
Plus shares from assumed conversions:
Convertible preferred stock............. 6,993 1,310 --
Effect of dilutive options and warrants. 592 1,117 --
--------- --------- ---------
Weighted-average common shares used for
diluted earnings (loss) per share....... 9,603 14,157 13,898
========= ========= =========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $0.16 $0.16 ($1.08)
========= ========= =========
Antidilutive Securities*
Options and warrants outstanding at
end of period......................... 202 216 2,186
========= ========= =========
Weighted-average exercise price........... $4.57 $9.49 $3.04
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
*Antidilutive securities consist of options and warrants not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share because i) the exercise
price of each of these options was greater than the average market price
of the Company's Common Stock during the period or ii) the Company
incurred a net loss during the period resulting in all options and
warrants outstanding being antidilutive.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could vary from these estimates.
Page 28
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NOTE 2--BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS:
(In thousands)
December 31,
-----------------------------------
Pro Forma
1997
1996 1997 (Unaudited)
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Inventory
Raw materials.................. $1,839 $2,176 $2,176
Work in progress............... 138 161 161
----------- ----------- -----------
$1,977 $2,337 $2,337
=========== =========== ===========
Property and equipment
Land........................... $3,827 $3,827 --
Buildings and improvements..... 7,175 8,890 288
Machinery and equipment........ 34,624 42,784 42,784
Office and computer equipment.. 613 793 793
Furniture and fixtures......... 268 312 312
Deposits on machinery and
equipment.................... 250 595 595
----------- ----------- -----------
46,757 57,201 44,772
Less accumulated depreciation.. (4,981) (11,074) (10,662)
----------- ----------- -----------
$41,776 $46,127 $34,110
=========== =========== ===========
Property and equipment acquired under
capital leases included above
Machinery and equipment........ $7,819 $7,819 $7,819
Office and computer equipment.. 36 36 36
Furniture and fixtures......... 57 57 57
----------- ----------- -----------
7,912 7,912 7,912
Less accumulated depreciation.. (2,699) (3,919) (3,919)
----------- ----------- -----------
$5,213 $3,993 $3,993
=========== =========== ===========
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Accrued payroll and related
expenses..................... $642 $762 $762
Accrued income tax............. 621 456 456
Other accrued liabilities...... 2,037 1,751 1,473
----------- ----------- -----------
$3,300 $2,969 $2,691
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Page 29
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ARRANGEMENT:
In February 1995, the Company joined a consortium (the
"Consortium") of semiconductor companies which entered into a research
and development contract with the Advance Research Projects Agency
(ARPA), a United States Government agency. Under this agreement, ARPA
will provide funds based on the completion of milestones approved by
ARPA and the Consortium. The agreement expired in 1997. Income generated
from the research and development contract was recognized upon the
completion of milestones, which approximates the percentage of
completion method. Accordingly, amounts totaling $318,000, $228,000 and
$123,500 were recognized under this agreement during 1995, 1996 and
1997, respectively, and included in interest and other income.
Additionally during 1996, the Company received $289,000 from ARPA which
it used to reduce the cost of equipment acquired. The Company is not
obligated to repay funding regardless of the outcome of its development
efforts; however, the agreement requires the Company to use its best
efforts to achieve specified results as per the agreement. The Company
retains ownership of the intellectual property developed under the
contract.
NOTE 4-LEASING ARRANGEMENTS AND COMMITMENTS:
The Company leases certain machinery and equipment, office and
computer equipment, and furniture and fixtures under long-term lease
agreements which are reported as capital leases. The terms of the leases
range from three to five years, with options to purchase or release the
equipment at the end of the respective lease terms. The Company intends
to exercise such options. If it exercises its purchase option, the
Company would pay approximately $800,000 in 1998.
The Company incurred rent expense under a noncancelable operating
lease until December 1996 when the Company purchased the facility it had
been leasing. Rent expense was $180,000, $216,000, and $46,000 in 1995,
1996, and 1997, respectively.
In January 1998, in connection with the sale of its facility (see
Note 5), the Company entered into a noncancelabe operating lease for the
82,390 square foot building on the facility that it occupies. The lease
is for ten years, with options to extend, with an initial lease rate of
$82,390 per month subject to price increases during the term of the
lease.
Future minimum lease payments over the next five years and thereafter
under capital and operating leases, including capitalized purchase
options at December 31, 1997 for capital leases are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Capital Building
Leases Leases
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Year ending December 31:
1998.......................................... $1,972 $1,002
1999.......................................... 135 1,059
2000.......................................... -- 1,162
2001.......................................... -- 1,166
2002.......................................... -- 1,264
Thereafter.................................... -- 6,775
----------- -----------
Total minimum payments........................ 2,107 12,428
===========
Less imputed interest and unamortized charges. (52)
-----------
Present value of payments under capital leases 2,055
Less current portion.......................... (1,972)
-----------
Long-term lease obligations................... $83
===========
</TABLE>
Page 30
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In 1993, 1994 and 1996, in connection with arranging capital leases,
the Company issued to the lessors warrants to purchase an aggregate of
457,550 shares of Series A Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.50 to $8.00. As a result of
the Company's initial public offering in 1996, the warrants are now
exercisable to purchase the same number of shares of Common Stock at the
same exercise price. The estimated value of these warrants at the time
of issuance, as determined by the Company, is being amortized as
interest expense over the period the leases are outstanding. The
warrants are exercisable at any time prior to 2003 (200,000 shares) and
2004 (257,550 shares). None of the warrants had been exercised at
December 31, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NOTE 5--NOTES PAYABLE:
December 31,
-----------------------------------
Pro Forma
1997
1996 1977 (Unaudited)
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Notes payable (in thousands):
Bank term note payable..... $3,375 $2,375 $2,375
Equipment notes payable.... 9,173 9,766 9,766
Real estate loan........... 6,500 6,601 --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total notes payable........ 19,048 18,742 12,141
Less current portion...... (3,893) (4,576) (4,435)
----------- ----------- -----------
$15,155 $14,166 $7,706
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Bank Term Note Payable
The Company fully utilized a borrowing facility by borrowing $2.0
million in 1995 and an additional $2.0 million in 1996. The facility
provides financing for up to the lesser of $4.0 million or 80% of the
cost of collaterized machinery and equipment. The loans accrue interest
at the London Interbank Bank Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.5% and requires 48 equal
monthly principal payments. The agreement requires the Company to
maintain certain financial covenants, including a minimum liquidity ratio
and a debt service coverage ratio, and prohibits the payment of dividends
without prior approval by the bank. At December 31, 1997, the Company
was in compliance with such covenants.
In conjunction with the Company's utilization of this borrowing
facility in 1995, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 21,740 shares
of the Company's Series A Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock at an exercise price of $4.60 per share. As a result of the
Page 31
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company's initial public offering in 1996, this warrant can be exercised
to purchase the same number of shares of Common Stock at the same
exercise price. The $26,000 estimated value of this warrant at the
time of issuance, as determined by the Company and supported by an
independent appraisal, is being amortized as interest expense over the
period the note is outstanding. The warrant is exercisable at any time
prior to July 2000. The warrant had not been exercised at December 31,
1997.
Equipment Notes Payable
In 1995, 1996 and 1997, the Company entered into borrowing
facilities with a number of lenders, allowing the Company to finance 70%
to 80% of the cost of collaterized machinery and equipment. Borrowings
under these facilities accrued interest at rates ranging from 7.75% to
14.0% per annum with terms ranging from 36 to 48 months. Certain of the
credit facilities require the Company to maintain certain financial
covenants including minimum tangible net worth, quarterly revenues and
quarterly income before taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
At December 31, 1996 and 1997, the Company was in compliance with such
covenants. In accordance with the borrowing facility agreement entered
in 1995, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 97,826 shares of the
Company's Series A Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock at
an exercise price of $4.60 per share. As a result of the Company's
initial public offering in 1996, this warrant can be exercised to
purchase the same number of shares of Common Stock at the same exercise
price. The $118,000 value of this warrant at the time of issuance, as
determined by the Company and supported by an independent appraisal, is
being amortized as interest expense over the period the notes are
outstanding. The warrant is exercisable at any time prior to 2005. The
warrant had not been exercised at December 31, 1997.
Real Estate Loans
In December, 1996, the Company borrowed $6.5 million from a bank to
provide temporary financing for the acquisition of its facilities. The
loan accrues interest at 2.25% over the rate for 30 day certificates of
deposit and was collateralized by a certificate of deposit of equivalent
value. The Company has classified this loan as long-term at December
31, 1996 based on the refinancing disclosed below.
On March 25, 1997, the Company closed a mortgage loan with an
insurance company, which provided the Company with a $6.7 million five
year term loan. The loan is secured by the land, buildings and
improvements purchased in December 1996. The loan accrues interest at
8.5%, and is payable in equal monthly installments of $58,000, with a
balloon payment of $5.9 million due after five years. The proceeds of
this mortgage loan were used to pay off and retire the $6.5 million real
estate loan. In January 1998, the Company sold its facility which
consisted of land and two buildings with approximately 138,336 square
space of building space. Net proceeds from the sale of the facilities
were $7.3 million, net of the elimination of $6.6 million of mortgage
debt, fees, commissions and closing costs. The Pro Forma (Unaudited)
Balance Sheet and Balance Sheet Information in the Footnotes reflects
this transaction as if it had occurred on December 31, 1997.
The Company is now leasing the approximately 82,390 square foot
building on the facility that it occupies. See Note 4
Page 32
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Maturities of Loans and Notes Payable
The aggregate maturities of notes payable at December 31, 1997 are as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pro Forma
1997
1997 (Unaudited)
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
1998...................... $4,576 $4,435
1999...................... 3,763 3,608
2000...................... 3,142 2,975
2001...................... 1,403 1,218
2002...................... 5,953 --
----------- -----------
Total..................... 18,837 12,236
Less unamortized charges.. (95) (95)
Less current portion...... (4,576) (4,435)
----------- -----------
Long-term borrowings...... $14,166 $7,706
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Line of Credit
In December 1997, the Company entered into a line of credit
agreement with a bank which provides, through December 1998, for
borrowings up to the lesser of $5,000,000 or 80% of eligible accounts
receivable. At December 31, 1997, no amounts were outstanding under this
line of credit. Borrowings under the line of credit accrue interest at
the bank's prime rate (8.5% at December 31, 1997) plus 1.25% and are
collateralized by the assets of the Company. The agreement requires the
Company to maintain certain financial covenants, including a liquidity
ratio, minimum tangible net worth, maximum debt to tangible net
worth, quarterly profitability and prohibits the Company from the
payment of dividends without prior approval by the bank. At December
31, 1997, the Company was in compliance with such covenants.
In conjunction with the line of credit agreement, the Company issued
a warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an
exercise price of $0.90 per share. At the time of issuance, the value
of the warrants was determined to be negligible. The warrant is
exercisable at any time prior to 2002. The warrant has not been
exercised as of December 31, 1997.
NOTE 6-COMMON STOCK AND MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED
STOCK:
On February 28, 1996, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of Common
Stock at $7.50 per share in the Company's initial public offering
("IPO"). In addition, the underwriters exercised their over allotment
option to purchase 450,000 shares of Common Stock. Proceeds net of
discounts, commissions and offering expenses, total approximately $23.1
million.
Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value, of
7,862,000 shares and an amount of $15,981,000 were converted into the
same number of common shares at the Company's IPO.
Page 33
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7-STOCK OPTIONS:
1993 Stock Option Plan
In April 1993, the Board of Directors and shareholders adopted the
1993 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan")
which as amended, provides for the grant of incentive stock options
(ISOs) and nonqualified stock options (NSOs) to purchase up to 2,514,921
shares of Common Stock. ISOs may be granted to employees and NSOs may
be granted to either employees or consultants. In accordance with the
Plan, the stated exercise price shall not be less than 100% and 85% of
the estimated fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant for
ISOs and NSOs, respectively, as determined by the Board of Directors.
The Plan provides that the options shall be exercisable over a period
not to exceed ten years and shall vest as determined by the Board of
Directors. Substantially all of the options vest 25% one year after the
date of grant and 1/48 each month thereafter. Compensation expense of
approximately $200,000 was recognized on stock options granted between
June and November, 1995, and is being amortized over the four-year
vesting period.
Director Stock Option Plan
In connection with the IPO, the Company adopted a Director Stock
Option Plan (the "Director Plan"). A total of 100,000 shares of Common
Stock have been authorized for issuance under the Director Plan. The
Director Plan provides for the grant of NSOs to non-employee directors
of the Company. The Director Plan provides that each non-employee
director who joins the Board will automatically be granted an NSO to
purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock on the date upon which such
person first becomes a non-employee director (the "Initial Grant"). In
addition, each non-employee director will automatically receive an NSO
to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock upon such director's annual re-
election to the Board, provided the director has been a member of the
Board for at least six months upon the date of such re-election (the
"Subsequent Grant"). The Initial Grant vests and becomes exercisable
as to 25% of the shares one year after the date of grant and as to 1/48
of the shares each month thereafter, and each Subsequent Grant shall
become exercisable as to 1/12 of the shares each month following the
date of grant, both subject to the director's continuous service. The
exercise price of all stock options granted under the Director Plan is
equal to the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the date
of grant. Options granted under the Director Plan have a term of ten
years. Unless terminated sooner, the Director Plan will terminate in
2006. Options for 20,000 shares were granted in 1997 under the Director
Plan.
1997 Non Statutory Stock Plan
In October 1997, the Board of Directors adopted the 1997 Non-
Statutory Stock Plan, which provides for the grant of non-qualified
stock options to purchase up to 250,000 share of Common Stock. The
NSOs may only be granted to non-executive officer employees. In
accordance with the Plan, the stated exercise price shall not be less
than 85% of the estimated fair market value of the Common Stock on
the date of grant of the NSO. The options shall be exercisable over
a period not to exceed ten years and shall vest 25% after the year of
grant and 1/48 each month thereafter. No options were granted in 1997
under this plan.
Repricing of Employee Stock Options
As approved by the Board of Directors on January 27, 1998 and
effective as of January 30, 1998, the Company allowed all employee
holders of outstanding stock options to exchange higher priced options
Page 34
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for new stock options at an exercise price of $1.06 per share, the fair
market value of the Company's Common Stock at the close of trading on
January 30, 1998. Those options vested at the time of the exchange would
vest on January 31, 1999, and those options unvested at the time of the
exchange would vest on the original option schedule, but would not be
exercisable until January 31, 1999. Options for 1,035,124 shares were
exchanged.
Restricted Common Stock
In September 1995, 398,333 shares of restricted Common Stock were
sold to employees upon exercise of stock options then outstanding. Each
unvested share of this restricted Common Stock is subject to repurchase
by the Company at the employees' exercise price if an employee
terminates before such shares vest; vesting occurs over the same period
as the former options. In 1996 and 1997, respectively, 170,312 and
67,082 vested shares were converted into unrestricted shares, and 73,750
and 55,314 shares were repurchased by the company from terminated
employees. Of the remaining 31,875 restricted shares outstanding, 18,960
were vested.
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company's 1996 Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan") was
adopted by the Company's Board of Directors and shareholders in December
1995, and became effective upon the closing of the Company's initial
public offering on February 28, 1996. Under the Purchase Plan, a total
of 400,000 shares of Common Stock has been reserved for issuance to
eligible employees. The Purchase Plan allows employees to purchase
shares through payroll deductions at 85% of the fair market value of the
Common Stock at the beginning or the end of the applicable twelve-month
purchase period. The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an
"employee stock purchase plan" under Section 423 of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code. Unless terminated sooner, the Purchase Plan will terminate
ten years from its effective date. During 1996 and 1997, respectively,
25,062 and 59,656 shares were issued under the Plan.
Page 35
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Summary of Option Activity
The following table summarizes the Company's stock option activity
and related weighted average exercise price within each category for
each of the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996, and 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
Average Average Average
(Shares in thousands) Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
- --------------------- --------- ------ --------- ------ ---------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Options outstanding
at Jan. 1........... 612,500 $0.18 550,633 $1.04 890,200 $4.85
Options granted....... 615,000 $0.98 484,848 $8.74 1,295,745 $3.03
Options canceled......(547,294) $0.21 (68,126) $0.33 (519,829) $5.90
Options exercised.....(129,573) $0.20 (77,155) $6.04 (66,962) $1.35
--------- ------ --------- ------ ---------- ------
Options outstanding
at Dec. 31.......... 550,633 $1.04 890,200 $4.85 1,599,154 $3.18
========= ====== ========= ====== ========== ======
Options exercisable
at Dec. 31.......... 17,043 $0.24 147,944 $0.88 219,400 $4.52
========= ====== ========= ====== ========== ======
Available for grant
at Dec. 31.......... 916,944 509,301 253,385
========= ========= ==========
</TABLE>
Significant option groups outstanding at December 31, 1997, after
giving effect to the repricing discussed above, and the related weighted
average exercise price and remaining contractual life information are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options with Outstanding Exercisable Remaining
exercise prices -------------------- -------------------- Life
ranging from Shares Price Shares Price (Years)
- ----------------- ----------- -------- ----------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0.10 to $ 0.46.. 272,298 $0.24 186,407 $0.16 7
$ 1.00 to $ 1.50.. 1,180,499 1.06 5,646 1.50 10
$ 2.00 to $ 3.50.. 94,000 2.96 552 2.20 9
$ 7.00 to $ 9.50.. 52,357 7.45 26,795 7.58 8
----------- ------- ----------- ------- --------
Options outstanding
at Dec. 31 1,599,154 $1.74 219,400 $4.52 9
=========== ======= =========== ======= ========
</TABLE>
Fair Value of Stock Options and Employee Purchase Rights
The Company has four stock option plans which reserve shares of
Common Stock for issuance to employees, officers, directors and
consultants. The Company applies APB Opinion 25 and related
interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no
compensation cost has been recognized in the accompanying statement of
operations for the stock option plans, except for $200,000 which was
recognized on stock options granted between June and November 1995, and
which is being amortized over a four year vesting period. In January
1996, The Company adopted the disclosure only provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation".
Page 36
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Stock Option Plan, the fair value of each option grant is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in
1995, 1996 and 1997 respectively: dividend yield of 0% in all three
years; expected life of 3 years for each year; expected volatility of 56%,
57% and 65% and risk-free interest rates of 6.4%, 6.2% and 6.1%. The
weighted-average fair value of those stock options granted in 1995, 1996
and 1997 was $0.54, $4.33 and $1.72 per option, respectively.
The fair value of the employees' purchase rights for the Purchase
Plan, which was initiated on February 28, 1996, was estimated at the
beginning of the offering period using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following assumptions used for 1996 and 1997
respectively: dividend yield of 0%; an expected life of six months;
expected volatility of 56% and 65%; and risk-free interest rate of 5.3%
and 5.3%. The weighted-average fair value of these purchase rights
granted in 1996 and 1997 was $2.20 and $3.12, respectively, per right.
Had the Company recorded compensation costs based on the estimated
grant date fair value, as defined by SFAS 123, for awards granted under
its stock option plans and stock purchase plan, the Company's net income
(loss) and income (loss) per share would have been reduced to the pro
forma amounts below for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and
1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income (loss) as reported (in
thousands)....................... $1,550 $2,317 ($15,002)
Net income (loss), pro forma...... $1,521 $1,923 ($15,708)
Net income (loss) per share as reported
Basic........................... $0.77 $0.20 ($1.08)
Diluted......................... $0.16 $0.16 ($1.08)
Net income (loss) per share, pro forma
Basic........................... $0.75 $0.16 ($1.13)
Diluted......................... $0.16 $0.13 ($1.13)
</TABLE>
The pro forma amounts reflect compensation expense related to 1995,
1996 and 1997 stock option grants and purchase rights only. In future
years, the annual pro forma compensation expense will increase relative
to the fair value of stock options granted in those future years.
Page 37
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8-INCOME TAXES:
Through December 31, 1994 and in 1997, the Company incurred net
operating losses and recorded no provision for income taxes. The tax
provision for 1995 and 1996 current taxes consists of the following (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------
1995 1996
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal................ $48 $13
State.................. 93 169
--------- ---------
141 182
--------- ---------
Deferred:
Federal................ -- 489
State.................. -- (141)
--------- ---------
-- 348
--------- ---------
$141 $530
========= =========
</TABLE>
The tax provision reconciles to the amount computed by multiplying
income before tax by the U.S. statutory rate (34%) as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------
1995 1996
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Provision at statutory rate........... $575 $968
Benefits of carryforwards............. (527) (68)
State taxes, net of federal benefit... 93 175
Use of valuation allowance............ -- (475)
Other................................ -- (70)
--------- ---------
$141 $530
========= =========
</TABLE>
Deferred income tax assets comprise the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------
1996 1997
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Federal and state credit
carryforwards......................... $397 $1,689
Federal and state net operating
loss carryforwards.................... 1,575 8,631
Leases, treated as operating for tax... (1,111) (1,592)
Depreciation........................... (1,961) (3,165)
Reserves and accruals.................. 476 587
Other.................................. 246 (201)
--------- ---------
Deferred tax assets (liability).... (378) 5,949
Less valuation allowance........... -- (5,949)
--------- ---------
Net deferred tax asset
(liability).................... ($378) $ --
========= =========
</TABLE>
Page 38
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 1997, the Company had federal and state net operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards ("NOL's") of approximately $23,000,000 and
$8,000,000, respectively, which can be used to reduce future taxable income.
These NOL's expire through 2012, if not utilized.
The Tax Reform Act of 1996 limits the use of NOL's in certain
situations where changes occur in the stock ownership of a company. The
Company experienced such an ownership change as a result of the Company's
IPO in 1996, resulting in a limitation of the annual utilization of the NOL's
generated through the date of the IPO. Despite the limitation, the company
may be able to utilize the entire amount of NOL's prior to expiration.
NOTE 9-CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS:
Concentration of credit risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash in money
market accounts, certificates of deposit, investments in financial
instruments with a maturity of less than one year, and accounts
receivable. At December 31, 1996 and 1997, the Company had $5.2 million
and $1.9 million invested in money market accounts with a bank. At
December 31, 1996, the Company had a certificate of deposit of $6.5
million invested with a bank, and other investments in short term
financial instruments of $3.0 million invested with a sercurities
firm.
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers,
which are semiconductor companies, and maintains reserves for estimated
credit losses. Write-offs of accounts receivable were insignificant in
all periods presented. At December 31, 1996, two customers accounted
for 51% and 16%, respectively, of accounts receivable. At December 31,
1997, four customers accounted for 19%, 15%, 13% and 10%, respectively,
of accounts receivable .
Significant customers
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Customers comprising 10% or more of the
Company's revenues for the periods
indicated:
A......................... 29% 32% 17%
B......................... 3% 14% 16%
C......................... 1% 2% 14%
D......................... 8% 17% 4%
E......................... 20% 4% --%
</TABLE>
Page 39
<PAGE>
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 10-SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
Summarized quarterly financial data for 1996 and 1997 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
First Second Third Fourth
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996:
Net revenues.................... $8,057 $8,469 $10,385 $9,491
Gross profit (loss)............. 1,997 1,752 2,323 1,490
Net income (loss) .............. 612 567 1,021 117
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic......................... 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.01
Diluted....................... 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.01
1997:
Net revenues.................... 5,575 3,953 4,214 6,002
Gross profit (loss)............. (920) (1,086) (1,244) (1,095)
Net income (loss) .............. (2,473) (6,088) (3,271) (3,170)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic......................... (0.18) (0.44) (0.23) (0.23)
Diluted....................... (0.18) (0.44) (0.23) (0.23)
</TABLE>
Per share amounts, based on average shares outstanding and potential
dilutive shares each quarter, may not add to the total for the year.
Page 40
<PAGE>
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreement with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Page 41
<PAGE>
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
(a) Executive Officers - See the section entitled "Executive
Officers" in Part I, Item 1 hereof.
(b) Directors
The Company's Board of Directors consists of the following five
(5) individuals:
Name Age Principal Occupation
Patrick Verderico 54 Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Company
Philip R. Chapman 36 General Partner, Adler & Company
Gill Cogan 46 General Partner, Weiss, Peck & Greer
Paul R. Low 65 President, P.R.L. Associates
Eric A. Young 42 General Partner, Canaan Partners
Except as set forth below, each director has been engaged in his
principal occupation described above during the past five (5) years.
There is no family relationship among any directors or executive
officers of the Company.
Patrick Verderico joined the Company in April 1997 as its Chief
Operating Officer and was appointed the Company's President and Chief
Executive Officer and a director in July 1997. From August 1996 to
April 1997, Mr. Verderico was an independent business consultant. From
April 1996 to July 1996, Mr. Verderico was Chief Operating Officer and
Executive Vice President of Maxtor Corporation, a disk drive
manufacturer. From January 1994 to March 1996, Mr. Verderico was Chief
Financial Officer and Vice President Finance and Administration of
Creative Technology, a multi-media company. From October 1992 to
January 1994, Mr. Verderico was Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President Finance and Administration of Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., a
manufacturer of integrated circuits. Prior to 1992, Mr. Verderico had
various management positions in finance and operations with Coopers &
Lybrand, Philips Semiconductors and National Semiconductor. Mr.
Verderico is also a director of Catalyst Semiconductor and Micro
Component Technology, Inc.
Philip Chapman has been a director of the Company since March
1993. Mr. Chapman has been a principal of Adler & Company, a venture
capital management firm, since September 1991 and became a general
partner of Adler & Company in January 1995. From September 1989 to
May 1991, Mr. Chapman was a senior consultant with Booz Allen & Hamilton
International, a management consultant company. Mr. Chapman is also a
director of Global Pharmaceutical Corporation and Shells Seafood
Restaurants.
Gill Cogan has been a director of the Company since March 1993.
Mr. Cogan, a managing director of Weiss, Peck & Greer, L.L.C and a general
partner of Weiss, Peck & Greer Venture Partners, L.P., has over 14 years
of venture capital experience in computer software, communications and
semiconductors. From 1986 to 1990, he served as a partner of Adler &
Company, a venture capital group handling technology-related
investments. From 1983 to 1985, Mr. Cogan was chief executive officer
of Formtek, Inc., an imaging and data management computer company. He
is also a director of Electronics for Imaging, Inc., P-Com Inc. and
several privately held companies.
Paul Low has been a director of the Company since March 1993.
Since June 1992, Dr. Low has been President of P.R.L. Associates, a
consulting firm, and serves as a consultant to a number of technology
companies. From 1957 to 1992, Dr. Low worked for IBM Corporation and
held senior management and executive positions, including President,
General Technology Division and IBM Corporate Vice President; President;
President of General Products Division; General Manager, Technology
Products business line; and member of IBM's corporate management board.
Dr. Low also serves as a director of Applied Materials, Inc., Network
Computing Devices, Inc., Solectron Corporation, VLSI Technology, Inc.,
Xionics Document Technologies, Inc. and several privately held
companies.
Eric Young has been a director of the Company since June 1995.
Mr. Young was a co-founder of Canaan Partners, a venture capital
investment firm, and has served as general partner since its inception
in 1987. From 1979 to 1987, Mr. Young held various management positions
with General Electric Co. and G.E. Venture Capital, a venture capital
investment firm and subsidiary of General Electric. Mr. Young is also a
director of Spectrian Corporation, Visigenic Software, Inc. and several
privately held companies.
Page 42
<PAGE>
(c) Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Based solely on its review of copies of filings under Section 16(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, received by it, or
written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company
believes that during fiscal 1997 all Section 16 filing requirements were
met.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
(a) Compensation of Directors
Directors receive no cash remuneration for serving on the Board of
Directors. Non-employee directors participate in the Company's Director
Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan"). The Director Plan provides for
the grant of nonstatutory stock options to non-employee directors. A
total of 100,000 shares of Common Stock has been authorized for issuance
under the Director Plan. Each non-employee director who joins the Board
will automatically be granted a nonstatutory option to purchase 20,000
shares of Common Stock on the date upon which such person first becomes
a director (the "Initial Grant"). In addition, each non-employee
director will automatically receive a nonstatutory option to purchase
5,000 shares of Common Stock upon such director's annual re-election to
the Board, provided the director has been a member of the Board for at
least six months upon the date of such re-election (the "Subsequent
Grant"). The exercise price of each option granted under the Director
Plan must be equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the
date of grant. The Initial Grant vests over a four-year period, with
25% of the shares subject to the Initial Grant vesting on the first
anniversary of the Initial Grant and the remainder vesting monthly
thereafter, and the Subsequent Grant vests monthly over a 12 month
period, in each case unless terminated sooner upon termination of the
optionee's status as a director or otherwise pursuant to the Director
Plan. In the event of a merger of the Company with or into another
corporation or a consolidation, acquisition of assets or other change in
control transaction involving the Company, each option becomes
exercisable in full or will be assumed or an equivalent option
substituted by the successor corporation. Unless terminated sooner, the
Director Plan will terminate in 2006. The Director Plan is currently
administered by the Board of Directors. The Board has authority to amend
or terminate the Director Plan, provided that no such action may impair
the rights of any optionee without the optionee's consent. Under the
Director Plan, on June 17, 1997, each of Messrs. Chapman, Cogan, Low and
Young were granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at
an exercise price of $3.375 per share.
(a) Compensation of Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information concerning compensation
paid to the Named Executive Officers during the Company's last three
fiscal years.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Summary Compensation Table
Long-term
Compensation Award
Annual Securities Underlying
Compensation(1) All Other
Year Salary Bonus Compensation
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Patrick Verderico(2) 1997 $214,617 $ 50,000 400,000
Chief Executive Officer
and President
Gerald K. Fehr 1997 183,996 6,000 -
Vice President, 1996 143,000 25,000 10,000
Technology 1995 134,712 15,000 -
Victor A. Batinovich(3) 1997 203,269 - -
Former Chief Executive 1996 200,000 50,000 20,000
Officer and President 1995 139,616 35,000 -
Tony Lin(4) 1997 146,337 - -
Former Chief Financial 1996 122,000 25,000 10,000
Officer 1995 105,000 15,000 70,000
Joel Camarda(5) 1997 143,241 - -
Former Vice President, 1996 137,000 - 10,000
Operations 1995 130,000 17,500 25,000
- ----------------------
</TABLE>
(1) Excludes perquisites and other personal benefits which for each
Named Executive Officer did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of
the annual salary and bonus for such officer during any fiscal year.
Page 43
<PAGE>
(2) Mr. Verderico joined the Company in April 1997.
(3) Mr. Batinovich left the Company in July 1997.
(4) Mr. Lin left the Company in November 1997.
(5) Mr. Camarda left the Company in December 1997.
Option Information
The following tables set forth information regarding stock options
granted to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 1997, as well as
options held by such officers as of December 31, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Individual Grants(1) Potential Realizable Values at
% of Assumed Annual Return Rates of
Total Stock Price Appreciation
Option Options Exercise Expiration (Through Expiration Date)(2)
Name Grants Granted Price ($/sh) Date 5% per Year 10% per Year
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Patrick Verderico 300,000 23% $1.0625 04/28/07 $200,460 $508,005
Patrick Verderico 100,000 8% $1.0625 08/05/07 $66,820 $169,335
- ---------------
</TABLE>
(1) Each of these options was granted pursuant to the Option Plan and
is subject to the terms of such plan . These options were granted at an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company's Common
Stock as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company on the date
of grant and, as long as the optionee maintains continuous employment with
the Company, vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% of the shares
subject to the option on the first anniversary of the date of grant and
an additional 1/48th of the shares subject to the option at the end of
each one-month period thereafter. In January 1998, all outstanding options
were exchanged for new options with an exercise price of $1.0625 per share,
which represented the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date
of approval for such repricing. All information in the table reflects
this option exchange.
(2) Potential gains are net of the exercise price but before taxes
associated with the exercise. Amounts represent hypothetical gains that
could be achieved for the respective options if they were exercised at
the end of the option term. The assumed 5% and 10% rates of stock
appreciation are based on appreciation from the exercise price per
share. These rates are provided in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and do not represent the Company's
estimate or projection of the future Common Stock price. Actual gains,
if any, on stock option exercises are dependent on the future financial
performance of the Company, overall stock market conditions and the
option holders' continued employment through the vesting period.
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year And
Fiscal Year-End Option Values
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Value of
Unexercised
Shares Number of Options
Acquired Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year
on Value at Fiscal Year End End(1)
Name Exercise Realized Vested Unvested Vested Unvested
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Patrick Verderico - - - 400,000 - -
Gerald K. Fehr - - 3,542 6,458 - -
- -------------
</TABLE>
(1) Represents the difference between the exercise price of the
options and the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on
December 31, 1997 of $0.625 per share. As of such date, the exercise
price of such options was less than the fair market value of the Common
Stock . In January 1998, all outstanding options were exchanged for
new options with an exercise price of $1.0625 per share, which
represented the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of
approval for such repricing.
Page 44
<PAGE>
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors consists of
Messrs. Chapman and Cogan, neither of whom is an officer or employee of
the Company. No member of the Compensation Committee or executive
officer of the Company has a relationship that would constitute an
interlocking relationship with executive officers or directors of
another entity.
Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
The Compensation Committee (the "Committee") is comprised of
Messrs. Chapman and Cogan, each of whom is a non-employee director. The
Committee sets, reviews and administers the Company's executive
compensation program. The role of the Committee is to establish and
recommend salaries and other compensation paid to executive officers of
the Company and to administer the Company's stock option plan and
employee stock purchase plan. The Committee approves all stock option
grants to executive officers, all executive officer base salaries and
any cash bonus payments to executive officers and reviews all stock
option grants to employees.
The Company's executive pay programs are designed to attract and
retain executives who will contribute to the Company's long-term
success, to mesh executive and stockholder interests through stock
option based plans and to provide a compensation package that recognizes
individual contributions and Company performance.
The Committee has determined that the most effective means of
compensation are base salaries, incentive bonuses and long-term
incentives through the Company's stock option programs.
Base Salary. The base salaries of executive officers are
initially determined by evaluating the responsibilities of the position
held and the experience and performance of the individual, with
reference to the competitive marketplace for executive talent, including
a comparison to base salaries for comparable positions in high growth,
technology-based companies of reasonably similar size. The Committee
reviews executive salaries annually and adjusts them as appropriate to
reflect changes in the market conditions and individual performance and
responsibility. During fiscal 1997, salaries for executive officers
were increased by 0% to 23%. The Chief Executive Officer joined the
Company in April 1997 and his current annual base salary is $325,000.
Bonus. The Company maintains a bonus plan for executive officers
which provides for bonuses based on achievement of individual and
company performance goals. Specifically, each executive officer can
earn from 50% to 63% of his annual base salary in the form of incentive
bonus payments if all company and individual performance goals are
satisfied. The target Bonus factor for the Chief Executive Officers is
63%. The bonus is based 50% upon achievement of individual performance
goals and 50% upon achievement of company performance goals. This bonus
program reflects the Committee's view that bonuses should only be paid
when the Company and the individual executive achieve predetermined
performance goals.
Stock Options. Under the Company's Option Plan, stock options may
be granted to executive officers and other employees of the Company.
Upon joining the Company, an individual's initial option grant is based
on the individual's responsibilities and position. The size of any
annual stock option awards is based primarily on an individual's
performance and responsibilities. The Committee believes stock option
grants are an effective method of ensuring that the executive is taking
a longer term view of the Company's performance and that the executive's
and the stockholder's interests are in alignment.
The options granted to the Company's executive officers include a
provision that provides that the options shall become fully vested and
exercisable in the event of a change in control of the Company.
In January 1998, the Company's Board of Directors approved the
repricing of options for all employees that held options with exercise
prices in excess of $1.0625 per share and such employees were offered
the opportunity to exchange such options for new options at $1.0625 per
share, which was the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date
of the approval. In order to participate in the option exchange
program, employees were required to not exercise their options until
January 30, 1999. The Board undertook this action in light of the
reduction in the trading price of the Company's Common Stock and in
consideration of the importance to the Company of retaining its
employees by offering them appropriate equity incentives. The Board
also considered the highly competitive environment for obtaining and
Page 45
<PAGE>
retaining qualified employees and the overall benefit to the Company's
stockholders from a highly motivated group of employees.
Other. Other elements of executive compensation include
Company-wide medical and life insurance benefits and the ability to
defer compensation pursuant to a 401(k) plan. The Company does not
currently match contributions under the 401(k) plan.
The Company's Chief Executive Officer does not receive any other
special or additional compensation other than as described above.
The Committee has considered the potential impact of Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder (the
"Section"). The Section disallows a tax deduction for any publicly-held
corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1 million in any
taxable year for any of the Named Executive Officers, unless such
compensation is performance-based. Since the cash compensation of each
of the Named Executive Officers is below the $1 million threshold and
the Committee believes that any options granted under the Option Plan
will meet the requirements of being performance-based, the Committee
believes that the Section will not reduce the tax deduction available to
the Company. The Company's policy is to qualify, to the extent
reasonable, its executive officers' compensation for deductibility under
applicable tax laws. However, the Committee believes that its primary
responsibility is to provide a compensation program that will attract,
retain and reward the executive talent necessary to the Company's
success. Consequently, the Committee recognizes that the loss of a tax
deduction could be necessary in some circumstances.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
Philip R. Chapman
Gill Cogan
Comparison of Total Cumulative Stockholder Return
The following table sets forth the Company's total cumulative
stockholder return as compared to the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and
the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index for the period February 28, 1996
(the date of the Company's initial public offering) through December 31,
1997. Total stockholder return assumes $100 invested at the beginning
of the period in the Common Stock of the Company, the stocks represented
in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and the stocks represented in the
Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, respectively. Total return also
assumes reinvestment of dividends; the Company has paid no dividends on
its Common Stock.
Historical stock price performance should not be relied upon as
indicative of future stock price performance.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2/28/96 3/29/96 6/28/96 9/30/96 12/31/96
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IPAC 7.500 9.500 9.375 9.250 8.0781
S & P 500 644.75 645.50 670.63 687.31 740.74
Philadelphia
Semiconductor Index 196.45 175.99 174.71 187.46 240.30
3/31/97 6/30/97 9/30/97 12/31/97
IPAC 4.250 3.500 2.375 0.625
S & P 500 757.12 885.14 947.28 970.43
Philadelphia
Semiconductor Index 268.85 305.74 381.60 263.63
</TABLE>
Page 46
<PAGE>
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Principal Share Ownership
As of April 20, 1998, the following persons were known by the Company
to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Number Percent
<S> <C> <C>
Weiss, Peck & Greer Venture Partners(1) 2,524,009 18.0%
Gill Cogan
555 California Street, Suite 4760
San Francisco, California 94104
Entities Affiliated with Frederick R. Adler(2) 1,310,768 9.4
1520 South Ocean Boulevard
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
Canaan Partners(3) 786,358 5.6
Eric A. Young
2884 Sand Hill Road
Building 1, Suite 115
Menlo Park, California 94025
Bank America Ventures(4) 778,705 5.6
950 Tower Lane, Suite 700
Foster City, California 94404
The Equitable Companies Incorporated 764,641 5.5
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10104
- -------------------
</TABLE>
(1) Includes 1,338,308 shares held by WPG Enterprise Fund, L.P.
("Enterprise Fund"), 967,228 shares held by Weiss, Peck & Greer Venture
Associates II, L.P. ("VA II"), 206,975 shares held by Weiss, Peck & Greer
Venture Associates II (Overseas) Ltd. ("Overseas") and 11,498 shares held
directly by Mr. Cogan. Weiss, Peck & Greer Venture Partners II, L.P.
("VP II") is the general partner of Enterprise Fund, VA II and WPG Venture.
(2) Includes 732,180 shares held by Euro-America-I, L.P. ("Euro-America"),
108,774 shares held by 1520 Partners, Ltd. ("1520 Partners"), 448,849 shares
held directly by Mr. Adler and 20,965 shares held by Catherine Adler,
Mr. Adler's wife, as trustee for the benefit of Mr. Adler's minor children.
Mr. Adler disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Euro-America
and 1520 Partners, except to the extent that he derives a monetary benefit
therefrom. Mr. Chapman, a director of the Company, serves as a venture
manager for Euro-America. Mr. Chapman holds no voting or dispositive control
over shares held by Euro-America, and he disclaims beneficial ownership of
such shares. Mr. Chapman performs no services for and has no beneficial
ownership of shares held by 1520 Partners.
(3) Includes 391,304 shares held by Canaan S.B.I.C., L.P. ("SBIC"), 349,434
shares held by Canaan Capital Offshore Limited Partnership C.V. ("Offshore"),
41,870 shares held by Canaan Capital Limited Partnership ("CCLP") and 3,750
shares directly held by Mr. Young. Mr. Young is a director of the Company
and is a general partner of each of SBIC, Offshore and CCLP.
(4) Includes 697,865 shares held by Bank America Ventures, 77,540 shares
held by BA Venture Partners I and 3,300 shares held by BancAmerica Robertson
Stephens.
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the
Company's Common Stock as of April 20, 1998 (i) by each director of the
Company, (ii) by the Company's Chief Executive Officer, the Company's former
Chief Executive Officer and the three other most highly compensated executive
officers of the Company for fiscal year 1997 (such officers are collectively
referred to as the "Named Executive Officers"), and (iii) by all current
directors and executive officers as a group:
Page 47
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Number of Percent of
Shares Total
<S> <C> <C>
Gill Cogan(1) 2,529,009 18.0
Eric A. Young(2) 791,358 5.7
Gerald K. Fehr 662,825 4.7
Philip R. Chapman(3) 80,577 *
Paul R. Low(4) 20,710 *
Victor A. Batinovich(5) 429,525 3.1
Joel Camarda(6) 28,078 *
Patrick Verderico - -
Tony Lin(7) - -
All executive officers and directors as a
group (9 persons)(8) 4,552,082 32.5
- ------------------
* Less than 1%
</TABLE>
(1) Includes shares held by funds affiliated with Weiss, Peck & Greer.
Mr. Cogan disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares, except as to the
pecuniary interest therein arising from his interest in such funds. See
"Principal Share Ownership." Also includes 5,000 shares issuable upon
exercise of options to purchase Common Stock which are exercisable within
60 days of April 20, 1998.
(2) Includes shares held by funds affiliated with Canaan Partners. Mr.
Young disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares, except as to the
pecuniary interest therein arising from his interest in such funds. See
"Principal Share Ownership." Also includes 5,000 shares issuable upon
exercise of options to purchase Common Stock which are exercisable within
60 days of April 20, 1998.
(3) Includes 63,027 shares held directly by Mr. Chapman and 12,550 shares
held by Susan Chapman, Mr. Chapman's wife, in her name and as trustee for the
benefit of Mr. Chapman's children. Also includes 5,000 shares issuable upon
exercise of options to purchase Common Stock which are exercisable within
60 days of April 20, 1998.
(4) Includes 5,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase
Common Stock which are exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 1998.
(5) Includes 422,700 shares held by Mr. Batinovich, 4,000 shares held
by Mr. Batinovich as custodian for his son and 2,825 shares held by Mr.
Batinovich's wife. Mr. Batinovich left the Company in July 1997.
(6) Mr. Camarda left the Company in December 1997.
(7) Mr. Lin left the Company in November 1997.
(8) Includes 20,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase
Common Stock which are exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 1998. Also
includes 2,512,505 shares held by funds affiliated with Weiss, Peck & Greer
and 782,608 shares held by funds affiliated with Canaan Partners. See notes
(1) and (2) above.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
None
Page 48
<PAGE>
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
14(a) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number Description of Document
- ------- -----------------------
3.1! Restated Articles of Incorporation.
3.4! Bylaws, as amended.
10.1! Form of Indemnification Agreement.
10.2!* 1993 Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option Agreement.
10.3!* 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and form of Subscription
Agreement.
10.4!* 1996 Director Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option
Agreement.
10.5! Registration Rights Agreement dated March 24, 1993, as amended.
10.6! Lease Agreement dated June 16, 1993 between the Company and
WVP Income Plus VI.
10.7! Sublease Agreement dated July 15, 1995 between the Company and
Peripheral Computer Support, Inc.
10.8! Loan and Security Agreement dated September 15, 1995 between the
Company and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.
10.9! Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock, issued to MMC/GATX
Partnership No. 1 as of October 7, 1993, as amended.
10.10! Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock, issued to Phoenix
Leasing Incorporated as of October 7, 1993.
10.11! Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock, issued to Comdisco,
Inc. as of March 10, 1994.
10.12! Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock, issued to Silicon
Valley Bank as of July 10, 1995.
10.13! Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock, issued to Silicon
Valley bank as of July 10, 1995.
10.14! Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock, issued to The CIT
Group/Engineering Financing, Inc. as of September 15, 1995.
10.15! Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock, issued to
Comdisco, Inc. as of January 3, 1996.
10.16!! Sublease Agreement between the Company and Peripheral Computer
Support dated March 8, 1996.
10.17!!! Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, issued to MMC/GATX Partnership
No. 1, dated September 5, 1997.
10.18!!! Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock,
issued to MMC/GATX Partnership No. 1, dated September 5, 1997.
10.19!!! Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock,
issued to MMC/GATX Partnership No. 1, dated September 5, 1997.
10.20!!! Lease Agreement dated November 1, 1997, between the Company and
Jaswinder S. Saini and Surinder K. Saini.
10.21!!!! Purchase and Sale Agreement dated November 20, 1997, between
the Company and Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc.
10.22!!!! Lease Agreement dated January 20, 1997, between the Company and
Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc.
10.23** 1997 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option
Agreement.
10.24** Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated
December 31, 1997 between the Company and SIlicon Valley Bank.
10.25** Warrant to Purchase Stock, issued to Silicon Valley Bank as of
December 31, 1997.
23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP, Independent Accoutants.
24.** Power of Attorney (see page 51).
27.1** Financial Data Schedule.
! Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 (file no. 333-326-LA), as ammended, filed
January 17, 1996.
!! Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996.
!!! Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997.
!!!! Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed on January 30, 1997.
** Previously filed.
Page 49
<PAGE>
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
Change in Fiscal Year, filed December 11, 1997.
Sale of Facilities, filed January 30, 1998.
(c) Exhibits.
See Item 14(a) hereof.
(d) Financial Statement Schedules.
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are
not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial
statements or the notes thereto.
Page 50
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), the Registrant caused this Report on Form 10-K/A
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in
the City of San Jose, State of California, on April 27, 1998.
INTEGRATED PACKAGING ASSEMBLY CORPORATION
By: /s/ ALFRED V. LARRENAGA
-------------------------
Alfred V. Larrenaga
Chief Financial Officer
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed
below on April 27, 1998 by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities indicated.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature Title
/s/ PATRICK VERDERICO President and Chief Executive Officer
- -------------------------
Patrick Verderico (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ ALFRED V. LARRENAGA Chief Financial Officer
- -------------------------
Alfred V. Larrenaga (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ PHILIP R. CHAPMAN * Director
- -------------------------
Philip R. Chapman
/s/ GILL COGAN * Director
- ------------------------
Gill Cogan
/s/ PAUL R. LOW * Director
- ------------------------
Paul R. Low
/s/ ERIC A. YOUNG * Director
- ------------------------
Eric A. Young
* By: /s/ ALFRED V. LARRENAGA
----------------------------
Alfred V. Larrenaga
Attorney-in-fact
Page 51
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Numbers 333-49365, 333-30457 and 333-05571) of
Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation of our report dated January 27,
1998 appearing on page 20 of this Form 10-K/A.
Price Waterhouse LLP
San Jose, California
April 27, 1998
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Condensed Statement of Operations, the Condensed
Balance Sheet and the accompanying Notes To The Condensed
Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<CASH> 2,928
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 3,359
<ALLOWANCES> (263)
<INVENTORY> 2,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 9,118
<PP&E> 57,201
<DEPRECIATION> (11,074)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 55,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 14,995
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 40,290
<OTHER-SE> (14,052)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 55,482
<SALES> 19,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 19,744
<CGS> 24,089
<TOTAL-COSTS> 24,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 9,443
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 2,185
<INCOME-PRETAX> (15,002)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (15,002)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (15,002)
<EPS-PRIMARY> ($1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED> ($1.08)
</TABLE>
