<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. 1)
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec. 240.14a-11(c) or sec. 240.14a-12
</TABLE>
Southwest Gas Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: Common
Stock, par value $1.00 per share ("Common Stock"), of Southwest Gas
Corporation; performance shares of Southwest Gas Corporation and
options to acquire Common Stock
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
31,200,000 shares of Common Stock; 190,000 performance shares and
711,820 stock options
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): based upon
the cash merger price of $30.00 per share, determined as follows: sum
of (i) $30.00 times the estimated number of shares of Common Stock
which will be outstanding on the date the merger is consummated, (ii)
$30.00 times the number of performance shares, (iii) the difference
between the average option exercise price of $17.37 and $30.00 times
593,820, and (iv)the difference between the average option exercise
price of $26 and $30.00 times 118,000.
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: $949,671,947
(5) Total fee paid: $189,934
[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
$189,934
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
Southwest Gas Corporation
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
May 11, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
SOUTHWEST GAS LOGO
June 30, 1999
Michael O. Maffie, President and CEO
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
Southwest Gas Corporation scheduled to be held on Tuesday, August 10, 1999, in
the auditorium of the Company's Headquarters office building, 5241 Spring
Mountain Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, commencing at 3:00 p.m. Your Board of
Directors looks forward to greeting personally those of you able to attend.
At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders will be asked to approve the
principal terms of the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. and
the Company in exchange for $30.00 per share in cash. The Board of Directors
approved the merger, subject to shareholder approval and the satisfaction of
other conditions. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY CONCLUDED THAT THE
MERGER IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COMPANY AND ITS SHAREHOLDERS, AND
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR PROPOSAL (2), APPROVAL OF THE PRINCIPAL
TERMS OF THE MERGER.
I appreciate that you may have a number of questions regarding the proposed
merger with ONEOK, especially in light of the unsolicited offer from Southern
Union that was unanimously rejected by your Board of Directors. To assist you,
we have included a separate supplement that answers some commonly asked
questions regarding the proposed merger with ONEOK and our rejection of the
Southern Union proposal. I encourage you to review these questions and answers.
Your Board of Directors believes the merger with ONEOK is in your best
interest for several reasons, including:
- the merger will allow you to realize immediately the future value of the
Company's long-term prospects, rather than continue to experience reduced
rates of return on investment resulting from the significant capital
investment required to service the substantial growth in our service
territory and the inherent lag and uncertainty in recovery of those costs
through rate increases;
- the $30.00 per share to be received in the merger represents a 54%
premium over the closing price of our Common Stock on September 15, 1998
(the approximate date our discussions with ONEOK moved beyond the
exploratory stage) and a 23% premium over the closing price of our Common
Stock on the last trading day before the merger was announced; and
<PAGE> 3
- we believe ONEOK is likely to obtain all regulatory approvals necessary
to allow this transaction to close in the fourth quarter of 1999. In
fact, on June 21, 1999, this transaction was approved by the Public
Utilities Commission of Nevada, nearly two months faster than was
required by law. Furthermore, on June 25, 1999, a settlement was reached
with the staff of the Arizona Corporation Commission and the Regulatory
Utility Consumers Office in Arizona, a prelude to regulatory approval in
Arizona. Preliminary settlement discussions have also been held in
California. No other utility regulatory approvals are required.
Your Board of Directors rejected the offer from Southern Union because it
believed that the higher price did not adequately compensate you for the
increased financial and regulatory risks associated with this offer. The Board
believed that these risks substantially increased the likelihood that the
transaction proposed by Southern Union would not be consummated.
At the meeting you will also be asked to consider and approve the election
of 11 directors and the continued retention of Arthur Andersen LLP as the
Company's independent public accountants.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AND VOTED AT THE MEETING
REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU OWN AND WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO
ATTEND. ABSTENTIONS WILL HAVE THE EFFECT OF A VOTE AGAINST THE MERGER. WHILE
THERE MAY BE INSTANCES IN WHICH YOU WISH TO ABSTAIN, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE
YOUR SHARES IN YOUR BEST JUDGMENT AND TO PARTICIPATE IN THE VOTING PROCESS TO
THE FULLEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. ACCORDINGLY, WE REQUEST YOU TO COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE
AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
Promptly after the merger, a letter of transmittal will be mailed to all
shareholders to be used in connection with the surrender of their stock
certificates. The letter of transmittal will include instructions on where to
send the stock certificates.
Your interest and participation in the affairs of the Company are sincerely
appreciated.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Michael O. Maffie
<PAGE> 4
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
5241 SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD - P.O. BOX 98510
- LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89193-8510 -
-------------------------
PROXY STATEMENT SUPPLEMENT
JUNE 30, 1999
This Supplement provides answers to some commonly asked questions regarding
the merger with ONEOK and our rejection of the Southern Union proposal and
should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Proxy Statement.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
Q: WHAT WILL I RECEIVE IN THE MERGER?
A: If the merger is completed, you will have the right to receive $30.00 in cash
for each share of Company common stock you own.
Q: WILL I HAVE ANY INTEREST IN THE COMPANY OR ONEOK AFTER COMPLETION OF THE
MERGER?
A: No. You will no longer have any interest in the future earnings, growth or
prospects of the Company and will not have any interest in the future
earnings or growth of ONEOK.
Q: WHY IS THE COMPANY'S BOARD RECOMMENDING THE MERGER?
A: The Board believes that the Merger:
- gives our shareholders the opportunity to realize immediately the future
value of the Company's long-term prospects, rather than continue to
experience reduced rates of return on investment resulting from the
significant capital investment required to service the substantial growth
in our service area and the inherent lag and uncertainty in recovery of
those costs through rate increases;
- offers our shareholders a fair price from a financial point of view that
represents a 54% premium over the closing price of our Common Stock on
September 15, 1998 (the approximate date our discussions with ONEOK moved
beyond the exploratory stage) and a 23% premium over the closing price of
our Common Stock on the last trading day before the merger was announced;
and
- is likely to be consummated in the fourth quarter of 1999 since the Board
believes ONEOK is likely to obtain all necessary regulatory approvals in a
timely manner.
Regulatory approval was obtained from the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada
on June 21, 1999. A settlement was reached with the staff of the Arizona
Corporation Commission and the Regulatory Utility Consumers Office in Arizona on
June 25, 1999, a prelude to regulatory approval in Arizona. Preliminary
settlement discussions have also been held in California. To review the
background and reasons for the merger in greater detail, see pages 36 - 49 of
the Proxy Statement. To review factors that may affect our future performance,
see pages 30 - 33 of the Proxy Statement.
Q: WHY DID THE COMPANY'S BOARD REJECT THE OFFER FROM SOUTHERN UNION COMPANY TO
PAY $33.50 PER SHARE?
A: The Board rejected the Southern Union offer because it believed that the
higher price did not adequately compensate shareholders for the increased
financial and regulatory risks. These risks arise out of:
- Southern Union's highly leveraged capital structure (63% debt, including
trust
1
<PAGE> 5
originated preferred securities, to total capitalization for Southern Union
at March 31, 1999 compared to 37% debt to total capitalization for ONEOK at
February 28, 1999);
- Southern Union's smaller equity capital base ($313 million at March 31,
1999 for Southern Union compared to $1.2 billion at February 28, 1999 for
ONEOK);
- Southern Union's lower credit ratings;
- Southern Union's history of operational and regulatory problems in
Missouri; and
- the need to obtain an additional regulatory approval in Missouri.
The Board believed that these risks substantially increased the likelihood that
the transaction proposed by Southern Union would not be consummated. To review
the reasons for rejection of the Southern Union offer in more detail, see pages
47 - 48 of the Proxy Statement.
Q: WHAT IS THE REQUIRED VOTE?
A: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of the Company's common stock is required to approve the principal terms of
the merger.
Q: WILL I HAVE DISSENTERS' RIGHTS?
A: Any shareholder who does not wish to accept the merger consideration has the
right under California law to have the "fair market value" of his or her
shares as of the date before the announcement of the proposed terms of the
merger determined by the appropriate Superior Court in California if holders
of at least 5% of the Company's outstanding shares properly demand
dissenters' rights. "Fair market value" excludes any appreciation or
depreciation as a result of the proposed merger. This right is subject to a
number of restrictions and technical requirements. IF YOU ARE CONSIDERING
EXERCISING YOUR DISSENTERS' RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE FAIR MARKET
VALUE OF YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK COULD BE GREATER THAN, THE SAME AS OR
LESS THAN THE MERGER CONSIDERATION. See pages 61 - 63 of the Proxy Statement.
Q: WHAT DO I NEED TO DO NOW? SHOULD I SEND IN MY STOCK CERTIFICATES NOW?
A: Please mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed return envelope as soon as
possible, so that your shares may be represented at the Annual Meeting. In
addition, you may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting in person, whether or
not you have signed and mailed your proxy card. DO NOT SEND IN YOUR STOCK
CERTIFICATES NOW. If the merger is completed, you will receive written
instructions on how to receive payment for your stock.
Q: WHAT IF I WANT TO CHANGE MY VOTE?
A: Just send in a later dated, signed proxy card before the Annual Meeting or
attend the meeting in person and vote.
Q: IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN "STREET NAME" BY MY BROKER, WILL MY BROKER VOTE MY
SHARES FOR ME?
A: No. Your broker will vote your shares on the merger ONLY if you instruct your
broker how to vote. Your broker should mail information to you that will
explain how to give instructions to your broker. If you do not instruct your
broker how to vote, your shares will count the same as shares that are voted
against the merger.
Q: IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN "STREET NAME" BY MY BROKER CAN I VOTE THESE SHARES
IN PERSON AT THE MEETING?
A: No. You must first obtain a legal proxy from your broker in order to vote
your shares at the meeting. If you plan on attending the meeting simply check
the box on the voting form from your broker and mail it back in the postage
prepaid envelope.
2
<PAGE> 6
Your broker will send you a legal proxy which can then be voted at the
meeting.
Q: WILL I OWE ANY FEDERAL INCOME TAX AS A RESULT OF THE MERGER?
A: You will be taxed on your receipt of the merger consideration of $30.00 per
share to the extent that the amount you receive exceeds your tax basis in
your shares of Company common stock. Please note that if you owned shares of
our common stock on December 14, 1998 and you have held these shares more
than one year at the time of completion of the merger and your federal
capital gains rate is 20%, the increase in price of our common stock
resulting from the merger will likely more than compensate you for any
federal income taxes owed. However, due to the complex and individual nature
of the tax consequences of the merger, we urge you to consult your own tax
advisor regarding the specific tax consequences of the merger to you.
Q: WHEN DO YOU EXPECT THE MERGER TO BE COMPLETED?
A: We anticipate that the closing will occur promptly after receipt of all
regulatory approvals, assuming the principal terms of the merger are approved
by the Company's shareholders and all other conditions to the merger are
satisfied. We estimate that all regulatory approvals will be obtained and
become final in the fourth quarter of 1999.
Q: WILL I CONTINUE TO RECEIVE DIVIDENDS ON MY COMMON STOCK PRIOR TO COMPLETION
OF THE MERGER?
A. Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Company may continue to pay
regular quarterly dividends on its common stock if declared by the Company's
Board of Directors.
Q: WILL I BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE COMPANY'S DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN?
A. You will be able to participate in the plan until consummation of the merger,
unless the Company's Board changes or terminates the plan earlier. The
Company's Board does not currently intend to make any changes to the plan
prior to completion of the merger.
Q: WILL I BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN ONEOK'S DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK
PURCHASE PLAN AFTER THE MERGER?
A. Yes, you may become a participant in ONEOK's plan. Information will be
provided to you regarding how you may become a participant when you receive
payment for your stock.
Q: WHERE CAN I FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANIES?
A. Both ONEOK and the Company file periodic reports and other information with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). You may read and copy
this information at the SEC's public reference facilities. Please call the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about these facilities. This
information is also available at the SEC's Internet site at
http:\\www.sec.gov and at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange.
3
<PAGE> 7
SOUTHWEST GAS LOGO
SOUTHWEST GAS LOGO
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 10, 1999
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Southwest
Gas Corporation (the "Company") will be held on August 10, 1999 at 3:00 p.m., in
the auditorium of the Company's Headquarters office building, 5241 Spring
Mountain Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the following purposes:
1. To elect 11 directors of the Company;
2. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the principal terms of the
merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. and the Company in
exchange for $30.00 per share in cash;
3. To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the selection of Arthur Andersen
LLP as independent public accountants for the Company; and
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or
any adjournment thereof.
The Board of Directors has established June 28, 1999 as the record date for
the determination of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and to
receive notice thereof.
You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND
SIGN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED, POSTAGE-PAID
ENVELOPE.
A copy of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31,
1998 was previously provided to you.
/s/ GEORGE C. BIEHL
George C. Biehl
Senior Vice President/Chief
Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary
June 30, 1999
<PAGE> 8
LOCATION OF 1999
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
5241 SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
*SHAREHOLDER PARKING WILL
BE IN THE WEST PARKING LOT.
ATTENDANTS WILL BE AVAILABLE
TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE.
[MAP]
<PAGE> 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
SUMMARY..................................................... 1
Merger Consideration................................... 1
Voting................................................. 1
Record Date............................................ 1
Recommendation of the Company's Board of Directors..... 1
Factors Considered by the Company's Board of
Directors............................................. 1
Opinion of Financial Advisor........................... 2
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger............. 2
Litigation Affecting the Merger........................ 2
Dissenters' Rights..................................... 2
Covenants of the Company............................... 3
Covenants of ONEOK..................................... 3
Conditions to the Merger............................... 4
Termination of the Merger.............................. 4
Election of Directors.................................. 5
Ratification of Independent Public Accountants......... 5
VOTING AND PROXIES.......................................... 6
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS....................................... 7
Names and Qualification of Nominees.................... 7
Securities Ownership of Nominees, Executive Officers
and Principal Shareholders............................ 11
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD......................... 13
Board of Directors..................................... 13
Directors' Compensation................................ 13
Committees of the Board................................ 14
SECTION 16 INFORMATION...................................... 15
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance............................................ 15
Section 16(b).......................................... 15
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS......................... 17
Executive Compensation Report.......................... 17
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation......................................... 19
Summary Compensation Table............................. 20
Options/SARs Granted in 1998........................... 21
Options/SARs Exercised and Year-End Values............. 22
Benefit Plans.......................................... 22
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements........... 24
Performance Graph...................................... 25
APPROVAL OF THE MERGER...................................... 26
PARTIES TO THE MERGER....................................... 27
The Company............................................ 27
Market Information for the Company..................... 28
Selected Financial Information for the Company......... 28
Factors Which May Affect Future Performance of the
Company............................................... 30
Where You Can Find More Information About the
Company............................................... 33
ONEOK.................................................. 34
Selected Financial Information for ONEOK............... 35
Where You Can Find More Information About ONEOK........ 36
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE> 10
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.................... 36
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER.................................... 36
REASONS FOR THE MERGER...................................... 45
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR................................ 49
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER.................. 54
Interests of Outside Directors......................... 54
Interests of Inside Directors.......................... 55
Interests of Other Officers............................ 57
Indemnification and Insurance of the Company's
Directors and Officers................................ 59
LITIGATION AFFECTING THE MERGER............................. 59
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS.......................................... 61
SUMMARY OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT............................. 63
Structure; Effective Time.............................. 63
Merger Consideration................................... 63
Employee Benefit Plans................................. 64
Covenants of the Company............................... 65
Covenants of ONEOK..................................... 67
Other Covenants........................................ 68
Representations and Warranties......................... 69
Conditions to the Merger............................... 69
Termination of the Merger Agreement.................... 70
Amendments; Waivers.................................... 72
Remedies............................................... 72
REGULATORY MATTERS.......................................... 72
Antitrust Considerations............................... 73
Arizona Public Utility Regulation...................... 73
California Public Utility Regulation................... 73
Nevada Public Utility Regulation....................... 74
Other Public Utility Regulation........................ 75
Other Regulatory Matters............................... 75
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER....... 75
OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER............................ 76
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS................. 76
OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING.................... 77
SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS......................... 77
APPENDICES
Appendix A -- Merger Agreement and Amendment No. 1.......... A-1
Appendix B -- Opinion of Financial Advisor.................. B-1
Appendix C -- Chapter 13 of the California Corporations
Code, Dissenters' Rights.................................. C-1
</TABLE>
ii
<PAGE> 11
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
5241 SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD - P.O. BOX 98510
- LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89193-8510 -
-------------------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
JUNE 30, 1999
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this document. This
summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To
understand the merger fully and for a more complete description of the legal
terms of the merger, you should read carefully this entire document. The actual
terms of the merger are set forth in Appendix A.
MERGER CONSIDERATION
If the merger is completed, you will receive $30.00 per share in cash for
each of your shares of Company common stock. The aggregate payment to be made to
all holders of the Company's common stock will be approximately $920 million.
VOTING (PAGES 6 - 7 AND 26)
At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders will vote on a proposal
to approve the principal terms of the merger. Each share of common stock is
entitled to one vote. In order to be approved, a majority of the Company's
shares entitled to vote on the merger must vote in favor of the principal terms
of the merger. On the record date, there were 30,682,623 shares of the Company's
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, held by approximately 23,700
shareholders of record.
RECORD DATE
The close of business on June 28, 1999 is the record date for determining
who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Company's Board of Directors has unanimously approved the merger, the
terms of the merger agreement and the rejection of the offer from Southern Union
and recommends that you vote in favor of the principal terms of the merger.
FACTORS CONSIDERED BY THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS (PAGES 45 - 49)
The Board's decision to approve the merger, the terms of the merger
agreement and rejection of the Southern Union proposal to pay $33.50 per share
were the product of a number of factors, including:
- the Board's belief that, due to changes in the natural gas and electric
utility industries, the Company's financial position and the likelihood
that there would continue to be significant growth in the Company's
service territories, a business combination with a financially stronger
company would give the Company's shareholders the opportunity to realize
immediately the future value of the Company's long-term prospects without
the financial and regulatory risks associated with that growth;
- the $30.00 per share to be received in the merger represents a 54%
premium over the closing price of our common stock on September 15, 1998
(the approximate date our discussions with ONEOK moved beyond the
exploratory stage) and a 23% premium over the closing price of our common
stock on the last trading day before the merger was announced;
1
<PAGE> 12
- the Board's belief that the merger consideration is fair from a financial
point of view and in the best interests of the Company's shareholders;
- the Board's belief that there were few regulatory impediments to the
transaction; and
- the Board's belief that the increased price offered by Southern Union did
not adequately compensate the Company's shareholders for the
substantially increased risk that the transaction proposed by Southern
Union would not be consummated due to the additional time, regulatory,
operational and market risks associated with the Southern Union offer.
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR (PAGES 49 - 54)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch")
delivered its opinions to the Company's Board of Directors on December 14, 1998
and as of the date of this proxy statement, to the effect that the merger
consideration was fair from a financial point of view to the Company's
shareholders. The full text of the opinion of Merrill Lynch dated as of the date
of this proxy statement is attached to this document as Appendix B. The opinion
sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of the review
undertaken by Merrill Lynch. YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY READ THE OPINION OF MERRILL
LYNCH IN ITS ENTIRETY. MERRILL LYNCH'S OPINION IS DIRECTED TO THE BOARD, RELATES
ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW
TO THE COMPANY'S SHAREHOLDERS AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION AS TO HOW
YOU SHOULD VOTE ON THE MERGER.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER (PAGES 54 - 59)
The directors and officers of the Company own shares of the Company and
other interests in the Company's common stock and, to that extent, their
interest in the merger is the same as yours. However, some of the officers and
directors of the Company have interests in the merger that are different from
your interests as a shareholder. The Board was aware of these interests and
considered them in recommending and approving the merger.
LITIGATION AFFECTING THE MERGER (PAGE 59-61)
A complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California on
December 16, 1998 and amended on March 22, 1999, May 5, 1999 and June 25, 1999
seeking, among other things, to enjoin the merger, to rescind the merger
agreement or portions thereof, to implement an auction of the Company or similar
process, to void the $30 million termination fee which is payable in certain
events, and unspecified damages. Southern Union has intervened in this case and
is seeking, among other things, a temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction to maintain the status quo. On June 9, 1999, the Company signed a
Memorandum of Understanding with the shareholders' plaintiffs' counsel to settle
this action as to all plaintiffs, other than Southern Union.
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS (PAGES 61 - 63)
Any shareholder who does not wish to accept the merger consideration of
$30.00 per share in cash has the right under California law to receive the "fair
market value" of his or her shares as of the date prior to the announcement of
the proposed terms of the merger and to have this value determined by the
appropriate Superior Court in California, if at least 5% of the outstanding
shares of the Company properly demand dissenters' rights. This right is subject
to a number of restrictions and technical requirements. Generally, in order to
exercise dissenters' rights:
- you must vote against the merger;
- you must make a written demand for appraisal no later than the date of
the Annual Meeting; and
- if dissenters' rights are available, you must thereafter follow specified
statutory
2
<PAGE> 13
procedures in order to perfect your dissenters' rights.
Merely voting against the merger will not protect your dissenters' rights.
Appendix C contains the text of the California dissenters' rights law.
COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY (PAGES 65 - 67)
The Company has agreed to do certain things, pending completion of the
merger, including agreeing to:
- continue to operate its business in the usual, regular and ordinary
course in substantially the same manner as conducted prior to execution
of the merger agreement;
- not solicit any proposal or enter into any discussions regarding the
acquisition of the Company by another party or recommend any other
acquisition, unless, in response to a written unsolicited proposal, the
Board has determined, in its good faith judgment, after consultation with
its outside counsel and financial advisor, that the proposal is
financially superior to the merger, the soliciting party is reasonably
likely to have the funds necessary to consummate the proposed
acquisition, and failing to take any action with respect to the proposal
would create a reasonable possibility of a breach by the Board of its
fiduciary duties under applicable law;
- pay a termination fee to ONEOK of $30 million if it enters into an
agreement with another party, recommends or endorses another proposal,
withdraws its recommendation of the merger or a third party acquires 50%
or more of the Company's common stock; and
- enforce the Confidentiality Agreement between the Company and Southern
Union.
The Company's Board of Directors has also agreed to recommend shareholder
approval of the principal terms of the merger, subject to its fiduciary duties.
COVENANTS OF ONEOK (PAGES 67 - 68)
ONEOK has agreed to do certain things, pending completion of the merger,
including agreeing to:
- use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain financing for the
merger;
- cause its long-term unsecured debt to be rated at least BBB- by Standard
& Poor's Ratings Group and Baa3 by Moody's Investor Services, Inc. at the
time of consummation of the merger; and
- not become involved in a transaction that would make it necessary for
ONEOK or the Company to obtain additional approvals from any governmental
authority in order to complete the merger, if as a result of such
involvement the merger cannot be timely consummated.
ONEOK has also agreed to take certain actions following completion of the
merger, including agreeing to:
- appoint three of the Company's outside directors to its board of
directors following the merger;
- establish an advisory board following completion of the merger consisting
of the Company's outside directors;
- establish Las Vegas as the headquarters for its operations in Arizona,
California and Nevada;
- provide specified levels of employee benefits to the employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries;
- indemnify the officers and directors of the Company, to the extent
permitted by applicable law, from acts or omissions arising before
completion of the merger or arising out of transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement; and
3
<PAGE> 14
- subject to certain limitations, provide the Company's officers and
directors with directors' and officers' liability insurance for a period
of at least six years after completion of the merger.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER (PAGES 69 - 70)
The obligations of both the Company and ONEOK to complete the merger are
subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions. The most important of
these mutual conditions are:
- the approval by the Company's shareholders of the principal terms of the
merger;
- the absence of any legal restraints or prohibitions that would prevent
completion of the merger;
- all statutory approvals required to be obtained by either the Company or
ONEOK from any governmental authority (other than approvals in connection
with franchises, easements or similar rights) must have been obtained and
become final; and
- less than 5% of the Company's outstanding shares shall have presented
demands for payment of dissenters' rights. This condition may be waived
by mutual agreement.
ONEOK's obligation to complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction of
or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waiver by ONEOK of a number of
conditions. The most important of these conditions are:
- the Company's compliance with the terms of the merger agreement in all
material respects;
- the truth of the Company's representations and warranties in the merger
agreement, unless the failure to be true would not reasonably be expected
to have a material adverse effect on the Company;
- the receipt by ONEOK of a legal opinion stating that the merger will not
be a taxable transaction to the Company or ONEOK; this is only a
condition if there has been a change in federal tax law or the
interpretation or application thereof after December 14, 1998;
- the Company's obtaining all third party consents needed to complete the
merger, unless the failure to do so would not reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on the Company; and
- no condition shall have been imposed on the Company or ONEOK by any of
the Company's regulatory commissions that would reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on the operations of ONEOK in Arizona,
California and Nevada.
The Company's obligation to complete the merger is subject to the
satisfaction of or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waiver by the
Company of a number of conditions. The most important of these conditions are:
- ONEOK's compliance with the terms of the merger agreement in all material
respects; and
- the truth of ONEOK's representations and warranties in the merger
agreement, unless the failure to be true would not reasonably be expected
to prevent or materially delay or impede the merger.
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER (PAGES 70 - 72)
Either the Company or ONEOK may terminate the merger agreement:
- by mutual agreement;
- on the termination date, unless the party seeking to terminate the merger
agreement is in material breach of the merger agreement; the termination
date is December 14, 1999, unless the only condition to completion of the
merger is the failure to receive a necessary regulatory approval from a
regulatory commission, in which event the termination date will be
extended to June 14, 2000;
4
<PAGE> 15
- if the shareholders of the Company do not approve the principal terms of
the merger; or
- a law or final court order prohibits the merger.
The Company may terminate the merger agreement if:
- any covenant of ONEOK is breached in any material respect and is not
remedied within 30 days after notice to cure;
- any representation of ONEOK is untrue when made, the failure to be true
is not remedied within 30 days after notice, and, as a result, the merger
would reasonably be expected to be prevented or materially delayed or
impeded;
- on the earlier of June 14, 2000 and 60 days after all other conditions to
the merger have been satisfied, if ONEOK is unable to deliver the merger
consideration due to significant disruptions in the financial markets;
- on the earlier of June 14, 2000 and 60 days after all other conditions to
the merger have been satisfied if ONEOK becomes involved in a transaction
that would make it necessary for ONEOK or the Company to obtain
additional approvals from any governmental authority in order to complete
the merger and these approvals have not been obtained; or
- the Company has entered into a definitive acquisition agreement with
another party, paid the $30 million termination fee to ONEOK and has
otherwise complied with its obligations under the "no solicitation"
covenant.
In addition, ONEOK may terminate the merger agreement if:
- any covenant of the Company is breached in any material respect and is
not remedied within 30 days after notice to cure;
- any representation of the Company is untrue when made, the failure to be
true is not remedied within 30 days after notice, and, as a result, there
would reasonably likely be a material adverse effect on the Company; or
- the Company becomes obligated to pay the $30 million termination fee.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PAGES 7 - 11)
The names of 11 nominees have been submitted for election to the Board of
Directors of the Company. The 11 nominees receiving the highest number of votes
will be elected to serve until the earlier of the next Annual Meeting and the
date on which the merger is consummated. Shareholders have cumulative voting
rights with respect to the election of directors, if certain conditions are
satisfied.
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (PAGES 76 - 77)
The Board of Directors has selected Arthur Andersen LLP as independent
public accountants for the Company for the year ended December 31, 1999, subject
to ratification by the Company's shareholders.
5
<PAGE> 16
VOTING AND PROXIES
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by
the Board of Directors of Southwest Gas Corporation (the "Company") of proxies
representing the common stock of the Company (the "Common Stock") to be voted at
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the "Annual Meeting") to be
held on August 10, 1999, and at any adjournment thereof. This proxy statement
and accompanying proxy card are being mailed to shareholders on or about June
30, 1999.
A form of proxy is enclosed for your use. The Company will acknowledge
revocation of any proxy upon request of the record holder made in person or in
writing prior to the exercise of the proxy, or upon receipt of a valid proxy
bearing a later date. If you wish to revoke your proxy, you must deliver a
revocation or valid proxy bearing a later date to the Corporate Secretary of the
Company. If you execute two or more proxies with respect to the same shares, the
proxy bearing the most recent date will be honored if otherwise valid. All
shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation will
be voted at the Annual Meeting. If you specify by means of the proxy a choice
with respect to any matter to be acted upon, your shares will be voted in
accordance with your specification.
The entire cost of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. In
following up the original mail solicitation of proxies, the Company will make
arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of
Common Stock and will reimburse them for their expenses in so doing. Under an
agreement with the Company, Morrow & Co. will assist in obtaining proxies from
certain larger and other shareholders at an estimated cost of $25,000 plus
certain expenses. ONEOK may also assist the Company in obtaining proxies from
certain larger and other shareholders at no cost to the Company, if requested to
do so by the Company.
The total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at the close of
business on June 28, 1999, the record date for the determination of shareholders
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting (the "Record Date"), was
30,682,623. Only holders of Common Stock on the Record Date are entitled to
notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Company will appoint one or
three employees to function as inspectors of election in advance of the meeting
to tabulate votes, to ascertain whether a quorum is present, and to determine
the voting results on all matters presented to shareholders. A majority of all
shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy,
constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are each included in the
determination of the number of shares present; however, they are not counted for
the purpose of determining the election of each nominee for director.
Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote. Shareholders have
cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors, if certain
conditions are met. If you are entitled to vote, you may cumulate your votes for
a candidate or candidates placed in nomination at the meeting if, prior to the
voting, you have given notice at the meeting that you intend to cumulate your
votes. If you elect to cumulate your votes, you may cast as many votes as there
are directors to be elected, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding in your name on the books of the Company at the close of business on
the Record Date. You may cast all of your votes for one candidate or allocate
them among two or more candidates in any manner you choose. If any shareholder
has given such notice, all shareholders may cumulate their votes for candidates
in nomination.
6
<PAGE> 17
The persons named in the proxies solicited by the Board of Directors,
unless otherwise instructed, intend to vote the shares represented by such
proxies:
- equally FOR each of the 11 candidates for director named in this proxy
statement; however, if sufficient numbers of shareholders exercise
cumulative voting rights to elect one or more other candidates, the
management proxies will:
- determine the number of directors they are entitled to elect;
- select the number from among the named candidates;
- cumulate their votes; and
- cast their votes for each candidate among the number they are entitled to
elect; and
- FOR the principal terms of the merger (the "Merger") of a wholly owned
subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. ("ONEOK"; pronounced "one-oak") into the
Company in exchange for $30.00 per share in cash (the "Merger
Consideration"); and
- FOR the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP as independent public
accountants.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)
NAMES AND QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES
Each director elected at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders will serve
until the earliest of:
- the next Annual Meeting (normally held on the second Thursday of May);
- the date on which his or her successor is elected and qualified to serve
on the Board; or
- the date of completion of the Merger.
The nominees were elected to their present term of office at the last
Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 14, 1998. The 11 nominees for director
receiving the highest number of votes will be elected.
Information regarding the nominees is set forth below:
GEORGE C. BIEHL
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Corporate Secretary
Southwest Gas Corporation
Director Since: 1998
Board Committees: Finance
Mr. Biehl, 52, joined the Company in 1990 as Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer after serving in a number of capacities with Deloitte
Haskins & Sells (now Deloitte & Touche) for sixteen years and as chief financial
officer for PriMerit Bank for the five years before joining the Company. He also
assumed the responsibilities of
7
<PAGE> 18
Corporate Secretary for the Company in 1996. Mr. Biehl graduated from Ohio State
University with a degree in accounting and earned his MBA with an emphasis in
finance from Columbia University. He is a licensed CPA in several states and is
a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He is also a
member of the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce Leadership Las Vegas Program, and
serves on the finance committees of several trade association groups.
MANUEL J. CORTEZ
President and Chief Executive Officer
Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority
Director Since: 1991
Board Committees: Audit (Chairman), Compensation, Pension Plan Investment
Mr. Cortez, 60, served four terms (1977 - 1990) on the Clark County
Commission and is a former chairman of the Commission. He has been active on
various boards, including the Environmental Quality Policy Review Board, the Las
Vegas Valley Water District Board of Directors, and the University Medical
Center Board of Trustees, and served as chairman of the Liquor and Gaming
Licensing Board and the Clark County Sanitation District. He has also held
leadership roles with numerous civic and charitable organizations such as Boys
and Girls Clubs of Clark County, Lied Discovery Childrens Museum, and Boys Town.
Currently, Mr. Cortez holds professional memberships in the American Society of
Association Executives, the Professional Convention Managers Association, the
International Association of Convention and Visitors Bureaus, the American
Society of Travel Agents, and is on the board of directors for the Travel
Industry Association of America.
LLOYD T. DYER
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer
Harrah's
Director Since: 1978
Board Committees: Executive, Compensation (Chairman), Nominating
Mr. Dyer, 71, obtained a degree in banking and finance from the University
of Utah prior to his employment with Harrah's, a hotel/gaming corporation with
its principal facilities in Reno and Lake Tahoe, in 1957. He was elected
president and chief operating officer of Harrah's in 1975, and elected president
and chief executive officer in 1978. He remained in those positions with
Harrah's until his retirement in April 1980. Mr. Dyer is a trustee of the
William F. Harrah Trusts.
THOMAS Y. HARTLEY
Chairman of the Board, Southwest Gas Corporation
President and Chief Operating Officer, Colbert Golf Design and Development
Director Since: 1991
Board Committees: Executive (Chairman), Compensation, Nominating
Mr. Hartley, 65, obtained his degree in business from Ohio University in
1955, and was employed in various capacities by Deloitte Haskins & Sells (now
Deloitte & Touche) from 1959 until his retirement as an area managing partner in
1988. He joined Southwest Gas Corporation as Director in 1991 and was elected
Chairman of the Board of Directors
8
<PAGE> 19
in 1997. Mr. Hartley is actively involved in numerous business and civic
activities. He is a past chairman of the UNLV Foundation and the Nevada
Development Authority, and past president of the Las Vegas Founders Club. He has
also held voluntary executive positions with the Las Vegas Founders Golf
Foundation, the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce, and the Boulder Dam Area Council
of the Boy Scouts of America. He is a director of Sierra Health Services, Inc.,
and AmeriTrade Holdings Corporation.
MICHAEL B. JAGER
Private Investor
Director Since: 1989
Board Committees: Audit, Finance, Pension Plan Investment (Chairman)
Mr. Jager, 67, obtained a degree in petroleum geology from Stanford
University in 1955. After a four-year employment with the Richfield Oil
Corporation as a petroleum geologist, he joined Frank H. Ayres & Son
Construction Company and was involved in the construction of subdivisions and
homes in southern California until 1979. Since that time he has consulted in the
single family residential development industry, and owns and manages a number of
businesses in Nevada.
LEONARD R. JUDD
Former President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director
Phelps Dodge Corporation
Director Since: 1988
Board Committees: Executive, Compensation, Nominating (Chairman)
Mr. Judd, 60, former president, chief operating officer, and director of
Phelps Dodge Corporation, joined Phelps Dodge in 1963 and worked at that
company's operations in Arizona, New Mexico, and New York City. He was elected
to the Phelps Dodge board of directors in 1987, president of Phelps Dodge Mining
Company in 1988, and became president and chief operating officer of Phelps
Dodge in 1989. He remained in those positions until the end of 1991. Mr. Judd is
a member of various professional organizations and is active in numerous civic
groups. He serves as a director of Morrison-Knudsen Corporation.
JAMES J. KROPID
President
James J. Kropid Investments
Director Since: 1997
Board Committees: Executive, Compensation, Finance
Mr. Kropid, 61, received his undergraduate degree from DePaul University
and participated in the executive development program at the University of
Illinois. He joined Centel Corporation in 1961 and became president of its
Central Telephone Company-Nevada/Texas division in 1987. In 1993, the Governor
of Nevada appointed him to the position of general manager of the Nevada State
Industrial Insurance System, a position in which he served for almost two years.
He is currently president of his own investment company. Mr. Kropid holds
executive and board positions with various civic and charitable organizations
including the National Conference for Community and Justice (formerly known as
the National Conference of Christians and Jews), Las Vegas YMCA, and the
9
<PAGE> 20
Boy Scouts of America. He was formerly a board member for the Nevada Development
Authority, United Way of Southern Nevada, and treasurer of St. Jude's Ranch for
Children. He is a director of the Golf Company of Nevada.
MICHAEL O. MAFFIE
President and Chief Executive Officer
Southwest Gas Corporation
Director Since: 1988
Board Committees: Executive
Mr. Maffie, 51, joined the Company in 1978 as Treasurer after seven years
with Arthur Andersen & Co. He was named Vice President/Finance and Treasurer in
1982, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 1984, Executive Vice
President in 1987, President and Chief Operating Officer in 1988, and President
and Chief Executive Officer in 1993. He received his undergraduate degree in
accounting and his MBA degree in finance from the University of Southern
California. He serves as a director of Del Webb Corporation, Boyd Gaming
Corporation, and Norwest Bank/Nevada Division. A member of various civic and
professional organizations, he serves as chairman of the board of United Way of
Southern Nevada and trustee and treasurer of the UNLV Foundation. He also is a
director of the Pacific Coast Gas Association, the American Gas Association and
the Institute of Gas Technology.
CAROLYN M. SPARKS
Co-Founder
International Insurance Services, Ltd.
Director Since: 1988
Board Committees: Audit, Finance (Chairperson), Pension Plan Investment
Mrs. Sparks, 57, graduated from the University of California Berkeley in
1963, and with her husband, co-founded International Insurance Services, Ltd.,
in 1966 in Las Vegas. She served on the University and Community College System
of Nevada Board of Regents from 1984 to 1996, and in 1991 was elected to a
two-year term as chair of the Board of Regents. Mrs. Sparks is actively involved
with numerous charitable and civic organizations, including founding and
chairing the University Medical Center Foundation and the Children's Miracle
Network Telethon. She is currently chair of the Nevada Children's Center
Foundation and has been elected to the Foundation Boards of the University of
Nevada Las Vegas and the Community College of Southern Nevada.
ROBERT S. SUNDT
Retired President
Sundt Corp.
Director Since: 1987
Board Committees: Executive, Finance, Nominating, Pension Plan Investment
Mr. Sundt, 72, has been associated with Sundt Corp. in a variety of
positions since 1948. He was named President of Sundt Corp. in 1983. He is now
retired and has no continuing association with Sundt Corp. He is a member of the
American Institute of Constructors, Consulting Constructors Council of America,
and a life director of the Associated General Contractors of America. He was a
member of the American
10
<PAGE> 21
Arbitration Association and has served as an arbitrator on disputes concerning
the construction industry. He is a past member of the Construction Industry
Presidents Forum. Mr. Sundt is affiliated with a number of community
organizations and is past chairman of the Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of
Commerce.
TERRANCE "TERRY" L. WRIGHT
President and Chief Executive Officer
Nevada Title Insurance Company
Director Since: 1997
Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, Pension Plan Investment
Mr. Wright, 50, received his undergraduate degree in business
administration and his juris doctorate from DePaul University. He joined Chicago
Title Insurance Company while in law school and after graduation remained with
the company and eventually moved to the Las Vegas, Nevada office. In 1978, he
acquired the assets of Western Title to form what is now known as Nevada Title
Insurance Company. Mr. Wright is also associate general counsel for A.G. Spanos
Enterprises, Inc., one of the nation's largest apartment complex builders. He is
a member of the California and Illinois bar associations and is affiliated
professionally with the Las Vegas Board of Realtors, Nevada Land Title
Association, Las Vegas Executives, Opportunity Village, TPC board of governors,
Young President's Organization, and is past-chairman of the Nevada Development
Authority. Mr. Wright is also a trustee and an executive committee member of the
UNLV Foundation.
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF NOMINEES, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table discloses all Common Stock beneficially owned by the
nominees for directors and the executive officers of the Company, as of June 28,
1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF
NO. OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1) COMMON STOCK(2)
-------------------------- --------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
George C. Biehl................... 63,550(3)(4) *
Manuel J. Cortez.................. 7,173(5) *
Lloyd T. Dyer..................... 9,793(5)(6) *
Thomas Y. Hartley................. 18,532(5)(7) *
Michael B. Jager.................. 9,537(5)(8) *
Leonard R. Judd................... 7,200(5)(9) *
James J. Kropid................... 3,608(10) *
Michael O. Maffie................. 179,151(3)(11) *
Carolyn M. Sparks................. 11,731(5)(12) *
Robert S. Sundt................... 10,200(5)(13) *
Terrance L. Wright................ 2,212(14) *
James F. Lowman................... 38,073(15) *
Dudley J. Sondeno................. 45,364(16) *
Edward S. Zub..................... 51,800(17) *
Other Executive Officers.......... 100,511(18) *
Total................... 558,435 1.8%
</TABLE>
11
<PAGE> 22
- -------------------------
(1) The Common Stock holdings listed in this column include performance shares
granted to the Company's executive officers under the Company's Management
Incentive Plan ("MIP") in 1996, 1997, and 1998 and exercisable options
issued under the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan ("Option Plan").
(2) As of June 28, 1999, the directors and executive officers of the Company
beneficially owned, including exercisable options, and MIP performance
shares, 558,435 shares, which represent 1.8% of the Company's outstanding
shares. No individual officer or director owned more than 1% of the Common
Stock.
(3) Number of shares does not include 6,618 shares held by the Southwest Gas
Corporation Foundation, which is a charitable trust. Messrs. Maffie and
Biehl are trustees of the Foundation but disclaim beneficial ownership of
these shares.
(4) The holdings include 38,250 shares which Mr. Biehl has the right to acquire
through the exercise of options under the Option Plan.
(5) The holdings include 5,200 shares which the non-employee directors have the
right to acquire through the exercise of options under the Option Plan.
(6) Number of shares includes 4,593 shares over which Mr. Dyer has shared
voting and investment control with his spouse through a family trust.
(7) Number of shares includes 313 shares over which Mr. Hartley has shared
voting and investment control with his spouse through a family trust.
(8) Number of shares includes 2,337 shares over which Mr. Jager has shared
voting and investment control with his spouse through a family trust and
2,000 shares held in trust for Mr. Jager's spouse, over which Mr. Jager has
no control.
(9) Number of shares includes 2,000 shares over which Mr. Judd has shared
voting and investment control with his spouse.
(10) The holdings include 1,962 shares which Mr. Kropid has the right to acquire
through the exercise of options under the Option Plan and 1,646 shares over
which he has shared voting and investment power with his spouse through a
family trust. The family trust also holds 1,500 shares of Trust Originated
Preferred Securities issued by the Company's financing subsidiary,
Southwest Gas Capital I.
(11) The holdings include 117,500 shares which Mr. Maffie has the right to
acquire through the exercise of options under the Option Plan and 3,066
shares over which he has shared voting and investment control with his
spouse.
(12) Number of shares includes 5,000 shares over which Mrs. Sparks has shared
voting and investment control with her spouse through a family trust and
1,531 shares held as joint tenants with her spouse.
(13) Number of shares includes 5,000 shares over which Mr. Sundt has shared
voting and investment control with his spouse.
(14) The holdings include 1,962 shares which Mr. Wright has the right to acquire
through the exercise of options under the Option Plan.
(15) The holdings include 19,125 shares which Mr. Lowman has the right to
acquire through the exercise of options under the Option Plan.
12
<PAGE> 23
(16) The holdings include 31,875 shares which Mr. Sondeno has the right to
acquire through the exercise of options under the Option Plan.
(17) The holdings include 33,250 shares which Mr. Zub has the right to acquire
through the exercise of options under the Option Plan and 105 shares held
solely by his spouse.
(18) The holdings of other executive officers include 71,750 shares that can be
acquired through the exercise of options under the Option Plan.
A group of investment companies headed by Mario J. Gabelli has reported
that it owns 3,020,083 shares of the Common Stock (approximately 9.8% as of June
25, 1999). The Company has been advised that the investment companies hold the
shares as investment advisors for other beneficial owners.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors is responsible for the overall affairs of the
Company and for establishing broad corporate policies.
Regular meetings of the Board of Directors are scheduled for the third
Tuesdays of January, July, September, and November; the first Tuesday of March;
and the second Wednesday of May. An organizational meeting is also held
immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Board of Directors
held six regular meetings, one special meeting, and one organizational meeting
in 1998. Each incumbent director attended more than 75 percent of the meetings
of the Board of Directors and standing committees on which he or she served
during 1998.
DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION
Outside directors receive an annual retainer of $24,000, plus $1,000 for
each Board of Directors or committee meeting attended. Committee chairpersons
receive an additional $500 for each committee meeting attended. The Chairman of
the Board of Directors receives an additional $50,000 annually for serving in
that capacity. Directors who are full-time employees of the Company or its
subsidiaries receive no additional compensation for service on the Board.
Each outside director received on May 14, 1998, options to purchase 2,000
shares of the Common Stock under the provisions of the Option Plan. Under the
terms of the Option Plan, each outside director is entitled to receive
additional options to purchase 2,000 shares of Common Stock on the date of each
Annual Meeting during the 10-year term of the Option Plan. The purchase price
for the options is the market price of the Common Stock on the date of the grant
and will become exercisable, in increments over three years, commencing with the
first anniversary of the grant. All options granted to the outside directors
will expire 10 years after the date of each grant. The Option Plan contains
change in control provisions.
Outside directors may defer their compensation until retirement or
termination of their status as directors. Any cash they receive from the
cancellation of any outstanding options as a result of a change in control of
the Company may also be deferred. Amounts
13
<PAGE> 24
deferred bear interest at 150% of the Moody's Seasoned Corporate Bond Rate. At
retirement or termination, amounts deferred will be paid out over 5, 10, 15 or
20 years, with interest at 150% of the Moody's Composite Bond Rate.
The Company also provides a retirement plan for its outside directors. With
a minimum of 10 years of service, an outside director may retire and receive a
benefit equal to the annual retainer, at retirement, for serving on the
Company's Board annually for life. Directors who retire before age 65, after
satisfying the minimum service obligation, will receive retirement benefits upon
reaching age 65. Upon a change in control of the Company, each of the directors
of the Company with at least eight years of service will be entitled to receive
retirement benefits upon a change in control.
Information regarding the impact of the Merger on the compensation of
directors is described under "Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger -- Interests of Outside Directors" and "Summary of the Merger
Agreement -- Employee Benefit Plans -- Employee and Director Stock Options" and
"-- Post-Merger Benefits."
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
In order to assist it in discharging its duties, the Board has established
six permanent committees. The committees consist of Executive, Audit,
Compensation, Finance, Nominating, and Pension Plan Investment.
The Executive Committee meets, if necessary, to consider corporate policy
matters requiring timely action and to recommend other matters for consideration
and action by the Board. The Executive Committee consists of directors Hartley
(Chairman), Dyer, Judd, Kropid, Maffie, and Sundt.
The Audit Committee, whose functions are discussed below under the caption
"Selection of Independent Public Accountants," consists of directors Cortez
(Chairman), Jager, Sparks, and Wright.
The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board on such
matters as directors' fees and benefit programs, executive compensation and
benefits, and compensation and benefits for all other Company employees. The
committee is also responsible for the executive compensation report and related
disclosures contained in this proxy statement. The Compensation Committee
consists of directors Dyer (Chairman), Cortez, Hartley, Judd, Kropid and Wright.
The Finance Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board
regarding the financial policies, plans, and procedures for the Company and the
financial implications of proposed corporate actions. Its responsibilities
include reviewing strategies and recommendations with respect to financing
programs, dividend reinvestment and stock purchase programs, and capital
structure goals. The Finance Committee consists of directors Sparks
(Chairperson), Biehl, Jager, Kropid, and Sundt.
The Nominating Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding
nominees to be proposed by the Board for election as directors, evaluates the
size and composition of the Board of Directors, and establishes the criteria for
the selection of directors. In considering candidates for the Board, the
Nominating Committee seeks to achieve an appropriate balance of expertise and
diversity of interests recognizing factors such as the character and quality of
individuals, experience, age, education, geographic location, anticipated
participation in Board activities, and other personal attributes or
14
<PAGE> 25
special talents. The Nominating Committee will consider written suggestions from
shareholders regarding potential nominees for election as directors. To be
considered by the Nominating Committee for inclusion in the slate of nominees to
be proposed by the Board, such suggestions should be addressed to the Company's
Corporate Secretary. The Nominating Committee also is responsible for
recommending Board committee assignments. The Nominating Committee consists of
directors Judd (Chairman), Dyer, Hartley, and Sundt.
The Pension Plan Investment Committee establishes, monitors, and oversees,
on a continuing basis, asset investment policy and practices for the retirement
plan. The Pension Plan Investment Committee consists of directors Jager
(Chairman), Cortez, Sparks, Sundt, and Wright.
In 1998, no Executive Committee meetings were held, the Audit Committee
held four meetings, the Compensation Committee held three meetings, the Finance
Committee held one meeting, the Nominating Committee held one meeting and the
Pension Plan Investment Committee held three meetings.
SECTION 16 INFORMATION
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
The Company has adopted procedures to assist its directors and executive
officers in complying with Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), which includes assisting in the
preparation of forms for filing. For 1998, all but one of the required reports
were filed timely. The Form 4 listing the acquisition by Carolyn Sparks, as
trustee and beneficiary of the Sparks' Family Trust, of 4,000 shares of Common
Stock was not filed timely. An amended Form 4 for Mrs. Sparks, listing the
August 1998 purchase, was filed in January 1999.
SECTION 16(b)
Under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, the executive officers and
directors of the Company may be required to account for profits made in
connection with a purchase and sale of equity securities of the Company within a
six-month period. The executive officers and directors of the Company
participate in the Option Plan. The executive officers of the Company also
participate in the MIP and the Company's 401(k) plan, which permits participants
indirectly to invest in Common Stock. In addition, certain executive officers
and directors of the Company participate in the Company's dividend reinvestment
and stock purchase plan and directly own shares of Common Stock. Under the
provisions of Section 16(b), the disposition of shares in the Merger may be
treated as a sale of Common Stock. Unless the dispositions are exempted from
Section 16(b), they might be matchable with purchases of the Company's equity
securities by these persons, under the plans or otherwise, within six months
prior to completion of the Merger.
The Company's Executive Committee, with Mr. Maffie abstaining, has adopted
resolutions which are intended to exempt all such dispositions by officers and
directors for purposes of SEC Rule 16b-3, as interpreted by the SEC's staff.
15
<PAGE> 26
The securities holdings of each of the Company's executive officers and
directors as of June 28, 1999 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIRECTOR/ COMMON STOCK OPTIONS MIP SHARES 401(K) PLAN SHARES
EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1) (2) (3) (4)
----------------- ---------------- ------- ---------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Manuel J. Cortez......... 1,973 7,000 -- --
Lloyd T. Dyer............ 4,593 7,000 -- --
Thomas Y. Hartley........ 13,332 7,000 -- --
Michael B. Jager......... 4,337 7,000 -- --
Leonard R. Judd.......... 2,000 7,000 -- --
James P. Kropid.......... 1,646 3,660 -- --
Carolyn M. Sparks........ 6,531 7,000 -- --
Robert S. Sundt.......... 5,000 7,000 -- --
Terrance L. Wright....... 250 3,660 -- --
Michael O. Maffie........ 10,001 140,000 35,677 15,973
George C. Biehl.......... 14,250 45,000 11,050 --
Edward S. Zub............ 4,099 40,000 8,559 5,892
Dudley J. Sondeno........ 2,790 37,500 8,211 2,488
James F. Lowman.......... 3,249 22,500 8,209 7,490
Other Executive
Officers............... 5,393 91,250 19,070 4,298
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Certain of the directors and executive officers of the Company participate
in the Company's Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and may be
entitled to receive additional shares pursuant to the terms of the plan.
(2) Each of the directors is entitled to receive options to acquire an
additional 2,000 shares of Common Stock at the market price of the Common
Stock on the date of the Annual Meeting.
(3) Participants in the MIP may be entitled to receive additional performance
shares under the terms of the MIP.
(4) Certain of the executive officers of the Company may be entitled to acquire
or receive additional interests in Common Stock in the ordinary course
pursuant to the terms of the Company's 401(k) plan before the closing.
16
<PAGE> 27
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
Information regarding the compensation and benefits of executive officers
of the Company is set forth below. For information regarding the impact of the
Merger on the compensation of executive officers, see "Interests of Certain
Persons in the Merger -- Interests of Inside Directors" and "-- Interests of
Other Officers" and "Summary of the Merger Agreement -- Employee Benefit Plans."
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee")
administers the Company's executive compensation program. Under the supervision
of the Committee, the Company has developed and implemented an executive
compensation program designed to satisfy the following objectives:
- reasonableness;
- competitiveness;
- internal equity; and
- performance.
These objectives are addressed through industry-based compensation
comparisons and incentive plans that focus on specific annual and long-term
Company financial and productivity performance goals.
Base Compensation. The nature of the Company's operation has historically
led to the use of compensation systems widely used in industry, weighted for
utility companies, and accepted by various utility regulatory agencies.
Companies of comparable size, used to establish the peer group index for the
"Performance Graph," were factored into the compensation review. Other utility
and general industry surveys were also used to assess the Company's compensation
program. Continued use of such systems is designed to address the first three
compensation objectives. A range of salaries that are comparable with industry
levels provides an objective standard to judge the reasonableness of the
Company's salaries, maintains the Company's ability to compete for and retain
qualified executive officers, and provides a means for ensuring that
responsibilities are properly rewarded. Salaries for the Company's executives
are set relative to the midpoint levels for their positions based on this
industry comparison. Compensation above these levels is tied to achieving
specific financial and productivity performance goals.
Performance-Based Compensation. The fourth objective of the Company's
compensation program, performance, is addressed through the MIP and the Option
Plan, collectively referred to as the "Incentive Plans." The Incentive Plans are
designed to retain key management employees and to focus on specific annual and
long-term Company financial and productivity performance goals. Financial,
productivity, and customer satisfaction factors are incorporated in the MIP,
while the Option Plan is designed to enable executives to benefit from increases
in the price of the Common Stock, thereby aligning the economic interests of the
Company's executives with those of the Company's shareholders.
Under the MIP, an incentive opportunity expressed as a percentage of salary
is established annually for each executive officer. The maximum award
opportunities cannot exceed 140 percent of the targeted awards for meeting the
performance goals. Awards
17
<PAGE> 28
under the MIP are determined based on the Company's annual return-on-equity
performance, customers-to-employee ratios, and customer service satisfaction
targets. The financial performance factors used to make this determination
involve the average of the Company's return-on-equity performance over the last
three years (which is weighted and adjusted for inflation) and the Company's
current utility return-on-equity performance in comparison to a peer group of
natural gas distribution companies. The productivity performance factors used to
make this determination involve an absolute target of Company
customers-to-employee ratio and the actual customers-to-employee ratio in
comparison to a peer group of natural gas distribution companies. Additionally,
customer service satisfaction experienced throughout the Company's operating
divisions is measured by an independent outside entity. Each of the five factors
is equally weighted; and, if the threshold percentage for any factor is
achieved, a percentage of annual performance awards will have been earned. While
the financial factors incorporated in the MIP are significant to shareholder
interests, customer satisfaction and productivity factors are significant to
customer interests. In prior regulatory proceedings, the Company's regulatory
commissions have insisted that these customer factors be included in the MIP in
order to recover the cost of the program in the Company's natural gas rates.
Regardless of whether such awards are earned, no awards will be paid unless the
Common Stock dividend paid by the Company equals or exceeds the prior year's
dividend.
If annual performance awards are earned and payable, payment of the awards
will be subject to a possible downward adjustment depending upon satisfaction of
individual performance goals. The Committee will make such a determination for
the Company's chief executive officer's individual performance, who, in turn,
will make a like determination for the other executive officers. Further, the
annual awards will be split, with 40 percent paid in cash and the remaining 60
percent converted into performance shares tied to the value of the Common Stock
on the date of the awards. The performance shares will be restricted for three
years and the ultimate payout in Common Stock will be subject to continued
employment.
The Company's performance during 1998 exceeded the threshold percentage for
each of five financial and productivity targets. The Company's financial results
exceeded the target for its current utility return-on-equity performance in
comparison to a peer group of natural gas distribution companies and, as a
result of this year's performance, exceeded the threshold for the average
return-on-equity performance over the last three years. The Company's operations
exceeded the target for the internal customers to employee ratio, the customers
to employee ratio in comparison to a peer group of natural gas distribution
companies, and the customer service satisfaction survey.
Grants under the Option Plan were provided to the Company's executive
officers during 1998. The options granted were not based upon a predetermined
formula, but rather on the Committee's judgment as to the individual's
anticipated contribution to the future success of the Company. Information on
options granted to the named executive officers in 1998 are set forth under the
caption "Executive Compensation and Benefits -- Options/ SARs Granted in 1998."
CEO Compensation. Compensation paid to Mr. Maffie, as president and chief
executive officer for 1998, consisted of his base salary and performance award
under the MIP. Mr. Maffie's base salary was set relative to the midpoint level
for salaries paid to chief executive officers of comparable companies, taking
into consideration the length of service in his current position, and reflects a
5.3% increase in base salary effective July 20, 1998. Mr. Maffie's performance
award under the MIP totaled $585,002 and represented
18
<PAGE> 29
the Company's overall performance in relation to established performance goals.
During the year, the Company's performance, as discussed above, exceeded the
targets in four out of the five performance factors and the threshold level for
the remaining factor. The Company's annual return-on-equity financial target and
the three productivity targets were exceeded. The threshold for the three-year
average return-on-equity financial performance was also exceeded, as a result of
the Company's financial performance in 1998. Mr. Maffie's target performance
award for 1998 was set equal to $450,000 or 90% of his annualized December 31,
1998, salary (not the actual salary shown in the Summary Compensation Table)
with the award ranging from 14.8% to 140% of his target. Based on the Company's
overall 1998 performance in relation to the established goals, Mr. Maffie earned
130% of his target award under the MIP, with 40% being paid in cash and 60% in
performance shares.
Deductibility of Compensation. The Company's executive compensation program
is being administered to maintain the tax deductibility of all compensation paid
to the named executive officers pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the "Code"). Section 162(m) of the Code provides that compensation
paid to the officers in excess of $1,000,000 cannot be deducted by the Company
for federal income tax purposes unless, in general, such compensation is
performance based, is established by an independent committee of directors, is
objective, and the plan or agreement providing for such performance-based
compensation has been approved in advance by shareholders or is otherwise exempt
from such limitation. The Incentive Plans were designed to satisfy these
requirements and management believes that the compensation provided under these
Plans should be deductible. In the future, however, if the Merger is not
consummated, the Company may pay compensation that is nondeductible in limited
circumstances if sound management of the Company so requires.
The Committee believes that the compensation program addresses the
Company's compensation objectives, enhances the commitment of key management
employees, and strengthens long-term shareholder value.
Compensation Committee
Lloyd T. Dyer (Chairman) Manuel J. Cortez
Thomas Y. Hartley Leonard R. Judd
James J. Kropid Terrance L. Wright
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The above-named committee members, other than director Kropid, served on
the Company's Compensation Committee throughout 1998. Director Kropid joined the
committee after the retirement of James R. Lincicome at last year's Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. Mr. Lincicome served on the committee during 1998 until
his retirement on May 14, 1998.
19
<PAGE> 30
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table provides for fiscal years ended December 31, 1996,
1997, and 1998 compensation earned by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
each of the four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company at
year-end 1998.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION
---------------------------------------------------------------
BONUS($)
NAME AND ------------------------- OTHER ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) UTILITY(2) NON-UTILITY COMPENSATION($)
------------------ ---- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Michael O. Maffie.................. 1998 486,301 234,005 0 0
President & C.E.O. 1997 462,192 132,015 0 0
1996 435,479 129,602 500,000 0
George C. Biehl.................... 1998 225,425 72,385 0 0
Senior Vice President/ 1997 214,877 40,762 0 0
Chief Financial Officer 1996 204,773 40,324 200,000 0
& Corporate Secretary
Edward S. Zub...................... 1998 180,137 59,283 0 0
Senior Vice President/ 1997 160,729 56,871 0 0
Regulation & Pricing 1996 138,484 28,802 0 0
James F. Lowman.................... 1998 169,116 54,136 0 0
Senior Vice President/ 1997 161,401 35,665 0 0
Central Arizona 1996 154,015 29,336 0 0
Division
Dudley J. Sondeno.................. 1998 167,616 53,669 0 0
Senior Vice President/ 1997 159,901 30,387 0 0
Chief Knowledge & 1996 152,529 29,952 0 0
Technology Officer
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
----------------------------------
AWARDS PAYOUTS
------------------------ -------
RESTRICTED
STOCK LTIP ALL OTHER
NAME AND AWARDS($)(2) OPTIONS/ PAYOUTS COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION (3)(4) SARS(#) ($) ($)(5)
------------------ ------------- -------- ------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Michael O. Maffie.................. 350,997 25,000 N/A 59,410
President & C.E.O. 198,022 25,000 N/A 54,036
194,403 90,000 N/A 46,210
George C. Biehl.................... 108,577 7,500 N/A 19,830
Senior Vice President/ 61,143 7,500 N/A 17,329
Chief Financial Officer 60,485 30,000 N/A 13,700
& Corporate Secretary
Edward S. Zub...................... 88,928 7,500 N/A 20,352
Senior Vice President/ 47,807 7,500 N/A 16,583
Regulation & Pricing 43,223 25,000 N/A 12,723
James F. Lowman.................... 81,206 3,750 N/A 13,702
Senior Vice President/ 45,998 3,750 N/A 12,279
Central Arizona 44,004 15,000 N/A 10,316
Division
Dudley J. Sondeno.................. 80,514 6,250 N/A 14,218
Senior Vice President/ 45,581 6,250 N/A 13,983
Chief Knowledge & 44,928 25,000 N/A 11,209
Technology Officer
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) All compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is reported on
an earned basis for each fiscal year.
(2) Utility bonuses and restricted stock awards accrued for calendar years 1996,
1997, and 1998 were paid and awarded in 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively.
Restricted stock awards are paid in Common Stock following a three-year
restriction period if certain conditions are satisfied.
(3) Dividends equal to the dividends paid on the Common Stock will be paid on
the performance shares awarded under the long-term component of the MIP
during the restriction period.
(4) The total number of performance shares granted in 1996, 1997, and 1998, for
calendar years 1995, 1996, and 1997, and their value based on the closing
price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31,
1998, for the named executive officers are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES VALUE
------ --------
<S> <C> <C>
Mr. Maffie......................... 33,564 $893,642
Mr. Biehl.......................... 10,465 278,631
Mr. Zub............................ 7,504 199,794
Mr. Lowman......................... 7,737 205,998
Mr. Sondeno........................ 7,777 207,063
</TABLE>
20
<PAGE> 31
(5) The amounts shown in this column for each year consist of above-market
interest on deferred compensation (in excess of 120% of the Applicable
Federal Long-term Rate) and matching contributions under the Company's
executive deferral plan. Under the plan, executive officers may defer up to
100% of their annual compensation for payment at retirement or at some other
employment terminating event. The officers may also defer up to 100% of any
cash paid (i) because of the cancellation of outstanding MIP performance
shares and Option Plan options, and (ii) under the employment and change in
control agreements described below resulting from a change in control of the
Company. Interest on such deferrals is set at 150% of the Moody's Seasoned
Corporate Bond Rate. As part of the plan, the Company provides matching
contributions that parallel the contributions made under the Company's
401(k) plan, which is available to all Company employees, equal to one-half
of the deferred amount, up to 6% of their annual salary. The breakdown of
this compensation for each named executive officer is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INTEREST CONTRIBUTION
-------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Mr. Maffie........... $44,842 $14,568
Mr. Biehl............ 13,078 6,752
Mr. Zub.............. 14,963 5,389
Mr. Lowman........... 8,635 5,067
Mr. Sondeno.......... 9,196 5,022
</TABLE>
OPTIONS/SARS GRANTED IN 1998
The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Common Stock
subject to stock options granted under the Option Plan to the named executive
officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table during 1998, together with
related information.
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
INDIVIDUAL GRANT VALUE AT ASSUMED
----------------------------------------------------------------------- ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF PRICE APPRECIATION FOR
SECURITIES UNDERLYING TOTAL OPTIONS/SARS EXERCISE OPTION TERM(2)
OPTIONS/SARS GRANTED TO EMPLOYEES OR BASE EXPIRATION ----------------------
NAME GRANTED(#)(1) IN FISCAL YEAR PRICE($/SH) DATE 5 PERCENT 10 PERCENT
---- --------------------- -------------------- ----------- ---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Michael O. Maffie.... 25,000 25.00 $23.0625 7/20/08 $363,234 $916,734
George C. Biehl...... 7,500 7.50 23.0625 7/20/08 108,970 275,020
Edward S. Zub........ 7,500 7.50 23.0625 7/20/08 108,970 275,020
James F. Lowman...... 3,750 3.75 23.0625 7/20/08 54,485 137,510
Dudley J. Sondeno.... 6,250 6.25 23.0625 7/20/08 90,809 229,184
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Forty percent (40%) of the options become exercisable one year after the
grant. Thirty percent (30%) of the options become exercisable two years
after the grant, with the remaining becoming exercisable on the third
anniversary of the grant.
(2) The 5% and 10% growth rates for the period ending July 20, 2008, which were
determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, illustrate that the
potential future value of the granted options is linked to future increases
in growth of the price of the Common Stock. Because the exercise price for
the options equals the market price of the Common Stock on the date of the
grant, there will be no gain to the named executive officers without an
increase in the stock price. The 5% and 10%
21
<PAGE> 32
growth rates are for illustration only and are not intended to be predictive
of future growth.
OPTIONS/SARS EXERCISED AND YEAR-END VALUES
Shown below is information with respect to unexercised options granted
under the Option Plan to the named executive officers and held by them at
December 31, 1998.
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN 1998 AND
YEAR-END OPTION/SAR VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NO. OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
NO. OF OPTIONS/SARS AT OPTIONS/SARS AT
SHARES DECEMBER 31, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1998(1)(2)
ACQUIRED ON VALUES ------------------------------ ------------------------------
NAME EXERCISE REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE(3) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE(3)
---- ----------- -------- ----------- ---------------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Michael O. Maffie.... 0 $0 73,000 67,000 $807,375 $515,438
George C. Biehl...... 0 0 24,000 21,000 266,625 165,094
Edward S. Zub........ 0 0 20,500 19,500 225,938 147,656
James F. Lowman...... 0 0 12,000 10,500 133,313 82,547
Dudley J. Sondeno.... 0 0 20,000 17,500 222,188 137,578
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Represents the difference between the exercise prices for in-the-money
options and the closing price of $26.625 for the Common Stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on December 31, 1998, times the number of in-the-money
options.
(2) The difference between the option exercise price for all outstanding options
and the Merger Consideration of $30.00 per share is $1,795,313, $583,594,
$508,594, $291,797 and $486,328 for Messrs. Maffie, Biehl, Zub, Lowman and
Sondeno, respectively.
(3) Unexercised options are those options which have been granted but cannot yet
be exercised due to the Code restrictions on the value of incentive options,
restrictions incorporated into the Option Plan, and the specific option
agreements.
BENEFIT PLANS
Southwest Gas Basic Retirement Plan. The named executive officers
participate in the Company's non-contributory, defined benefit retirement plan,
which is available to all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries (other
than Northern Pipeline Construction Co.). Benefits are based upon an employee's
years of service, up to a maximum of 30 years, and the employee's highest five
consecutive years salary, excluding bonuses, within the final 10 years of
service.
22
<PAGE> 33
PENSION PLAN TABLE(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS OF SERVICE
ANNUAL ----------------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION 10 15 20 25 30(2)
------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 50,000..................... $ 8,750 $ 13,125 $ 17,500 $ 21,875 $ 26,250
100,000..................... 17,500 26,250 35,000 43,750 52,500
150,000..................... 26,250 39,375 52,500 65,625 78,750
200,000..................... 35,000 52,500 70,000 87,500 105,000
250,000..................... 43,750 65,625 87,500 109,375 131,250
300,000..................... 52,500 78,750 105,000 131,250 157,500
350,000..................... 61,250 91,875 122,500 153,125 183,750
400,000..................... 70,000 105,000 140,000 175,000 210,000
450,000..................... 78,750 118,125 157,500 196,875 236,250
500,000..................... 87,500 131,250 175,000 218,750 262,500
550,000..................... 96,250 144,375 192,500 240,625 288,750
600,000..................... 105,000 157,500 210,000 262,500 315,000
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) For 1999, the maximum annual compensation that can be considered in
determining benefits under the Plan is $160,000. For future years the
maximum annual compensation will be adjusted to reflect changes in the cost
of living as established by the Internal Revenue Service.
(2) Years of service beyond 30 years will not increase benefits under the basic
retirement plan.
Compensation covered under the basic retirement plan is based on salary
depicted in the Summary Compensation Table. As of December 31, 1998, the
credited years of service for the named executive officers shown in the Summary
Compensation Table are as follows: Mr. Maffie, 20 years; Mr. Biehl, 13 years;
Mr. Lowman, 29 years; Mr. Sondeno, 19 years; and Mr. Zub, 20 years.
Amounts shown in the pension plan table are straight life annuity amounts
notwithstanding the availability of joint survivorship benefit provisions.
Benefits paid under the basic and supplemental retirement plans are not reduced
by any Social Security benefits received.
Supplemental Retirement Plan. The named executive officers also participate
in the Company's supplemental executive retirement plan ("SERP"). Such officers
with 10 or more years of service may retire at age 55 or older and will receive
benefits under the SERP. Benefits from the SERP, when added to benefits received
under the basic retirement plan, will equal 60% of each officer's highest
12-months of salary, as depicted in the Summary Compensation Table. For Mr.
Maffie, compensation used to determine such benefits includes salary, cash
bonuses other than the 1996 non-utility bonus, and the payment of restricted
stock awards depicted in the Summary Compensation Table. The cost to the Company
for benefits under the SERP for any one of the named executive officers cannot
generally be properly allocated or determined because of the overall plan
assumptions and options available. For information regarding benefits under the
SERP in the event the Merger is consummated, see "Interests of Certain Persons
in the Merger -- Interests of Inside Directors" and "-- Interests of Other
Officers."
23
<PAGE> 34
SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
In July 1998, the Company amended the existing employment agreements with
seven of its designated officers (including the named executive officers), and
entered into change in control agreements with its remaining officers. The
employment agreements generally provide for the payment, upon termination of
employment by the Company without cause, as defined therein, of up to one and
one-half years of the amount of total annual compensation (base salary, a
predetermined level of incentive compensation and fringe benefits), and up to
three years of total annual compensation for Mr. Maffie. The employment
agreements further provide for the payment, upon the termination of employment
for "good reason," as defined therein, within two years following a change in
control of the Company, of an amount equal to two to two and one-half times of
total annual compensation for each of these officers, other than Mr. Maffie who
would receive three times total annual compensation. The change in control
agreements for other officers parallel the change in control provisions of the
employment agreements.
Restricted stock awards, stock options or stock appreciation rights will
vest and become immediately exercisable upon a change in control. Benefits under
the SERP may also vest and/or accelerate as a result of a change in control. If
any payment under these agreements would constitute a "parachute payment"
subject to excise tax under the Code, the employee will be entitled to an
additional "gross-up" payment. The terms of these agreements are for 24 months
for each of the officers, other than Mr. Maffie whose agreement is for 36
months. Each of the agreements will be automatically extended annually for
successive one-year periods, unless canceled by the Company.
For information regarding benefits which may be received under these
agreements as a result of the Merger, see "Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger -- Interests of Inside Directors" and "-- Interests of Other Officers."
24
<PAGE> 35
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The performance graph below compares the five-year cumulative total return
on the Common Stock, assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the total returns
on the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Composite Index (S&P 500) and the Edward D.
Jones Natural Gas Diversified Index, a peer-group index compiled by Edward D.
Jones & Company, consisting of the Company and 18 other diversified natural gas
distribution companies.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
E.D. JONES NATURAL GAS
SOUTHWEST GAS S&P 500 DIVERSIFIED INDEX (1)(2)
------------- ------- ------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
'1993' 100.0 100.0 100.0
'1994' 92.5 101.3 88.6
'1995' 121.5 139.3 117.3
'1996' 138.9 171.3 147.8
'1997' 141.0 228.6 185.2
'1998' 209.0 293.9 170.6
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) The Company selected the Edward D. Jones Natural Gas Diversified Index as a
peer-group index because it provides a representative sample of natural gas
distribution companies with at least 30%, but less than 90%, of their gross
revenues from distribution operations. This index should be available on a
continuing basis.
(2) The Edward D. Jones Natural Gas Diversified Index, which is weighted by
year-end market capitalization, consists of the following companies:
Chesapeake Utilities Corp.; Columbia Energy Group; Consolidated Natural Gas;
Eastern Enterprises; Energen Corp.; Equitable Resources, Inc.; KN Energy,
Inc.; MCN Corporation; MDU Resources Group, Inc.; National Fuel Gas Co.;
Nicor, Inc.; ONEOK; Questar Corp.; Semco Energy Inc.; the Company;
Southwestern Energy Co.; UGI Corp.; Valley Resources, Inc.; and Wicor, Inc.
25
<PAGE> 36
APPROVAL OF THE MERGER
(ITEM 2 ON THE PROXY CARD)
You are being asked to vote upon a proposal to approve the principal terms
of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 14, 1998, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 25, 1999 (as
amended, the "Merger Agreement"), among the Company, ONEOK and Oasis Acquisition
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK formed for the purpose of
consummating the Merger ("Merger Sub"). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement,
Merger Sub will merge into the Company, subject to shareholder approval and the
satisfaction of other conditions. Each of the Company's shareholders will
receive $30.00 per share in cash in the Merger (the "Merger Consideration"),
unless dissenters' rights are available and have been properly exercised.
YOU SHOULD NOT SEND IN ANY STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH YOUR PROXY CARD. IF THE
PRINCIPAL TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT ARE APPROVED AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS TO
SATISFACTION OF THE MERGER ARE SATISFIED, YOU WILL RECEIVE INSTRUCTIONS ON WHERE
TO SEND YOUR CERTIFICATES.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock on the Record Date is required to approve the principal terms of the
Merger Agreement. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against the
principal terms of the Merger. Broker non-votes are treated as shares as to
which voting power has been withheld by the beneficial owners thereof, and
therefore, will have the effect of votes against the principal terms of the
Merger. While there may be instances in which you wish to abstain, the Board
encourages you to vote your shares in your best judgment and to participate in
the voting process to the fullest extent possible.
Shareholders will be entitled to exercise dissenters' rights if demands for
appraisal are received by the Company for five percent or more of its Common
Stock on or prior to the date of the Annual Meeting. For further information on
the availability of dissenters' rights, see "Dissenters' Rights" and Appendix C.
If dissenters' rights are available and properly exercised, it is possible that
the Merger will not be consummated. For further information, see "Summary of the
Agreement -- Conditions to the Merger -- Conditions to Each Party's Obligations
to Effect the Merger."
A complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of San Diego (the "Complaint") on December 16, 1998, and amended on March
22, 1999, May 5, 1999 and June 25, 1999 seeking, among other things, to enjoin
the Merger, to rescind the Merger Agreement or portions thereof, to implement an
auction of the Company or similar process, to void the $30 million termination
fee which is payable in certain events, and unspecified damages. Southern Union
has intervened in this case and is seeking, among other things, a temporary
restraining order and preliminary injunction to maintain the status quo. On June
9, 1999, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the shareholders'
plaintiffs' counsel to settle this action as to all plaintiffs, other than
Southern Union. For further information on the Complaint and the intervention of
Southern Union, see "Litigation Affecting the Merger." If an injunction is
obtained, the Merger cannot be consummated.
Consummation of the Merger is also subject to the receipt of various
governmental approvals, including regulatory approvals from the Arizona
Corporation Commission
26
<PAGE> 37
("ACC"), the California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") and the Public
Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN"); the ACC, the CPUC and PUCN are
collectively referred to herein as the "Commissions". Regulatory approval was
obtained from the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on June 21, 1999. A
settlement was reached with the staff of the Arizona Corporation Commission and
the Regulatory Utility Consumers Office in Arizona on June 25, 1999, a prelude
to regulatory approval in Arizona. Preliminary settlement discussions have also
been held in California.
It is anticipated that the closing will occur promptly after these
regulatory approvals become final if all other conditions to the consummation of
the Merger are satisfied. It is estimated that all regulatory approvals will be
obtained and become final during the fourth quarter of 1999.
The following sections of this proxy statement provide further information
about the principal terms of the Merger Agreement and the consequences of the
Merger. These sections may not contain all information that is important to you.
The actual terms of the Merger Agreement are contained in Appendix A. We urge
you to read the following sections and the Merger Agreement in their entirety.
PARTIES TO THE MERGER
The Merger Agreement was executed by the Company, ONEOK and Merger Sub. The
Company will survive the Merger. Immediately after the Merger, the Company will
merge into ONEOK. ONEOK will survive the second merger.
After the Merger, the Company's shareholders will no longer have any
interest in the Company or its future earnings, growth or prospects (including
the possibility that the Company might receive an offer to be acquired by
another interested party in the future at a higher price) or any interest in the
future earnings or growth of ONEOK. A vote in favor of the principal terms of
the Merger is therefore a vote in favor of receiving cash of $30.00 per share in
lieu of remaining a shareholder of the Company.
THE COMPANY
The Company purchases, transports, and distributes natural gas to
approximately 1.2 million residential, commercial, and industrial customers in
geographically and economically diverse portions of Arizona, Nevada, and
California. The Company is the largest distributor of natural gas in Arizona,
distributing and transporting gas in most of southern, central and northwestern
Arizona. The Company is also the largest distributor and transporter of natural
gas in Nevada, and distributes and transports gas in portions of California,
including the Lake Tahoe area and the high desert and mountain areas in San
Bernardino County.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Nevada and Arizona were the two
fastest growing states in the nation in 1998 in terms of percentage population
growth. According to Arizona Economy, Nevada has been the fastest growing state
for nearly four decades, and Arizona has been either the second or third fastest
growing state during this period. Over the past three years, customer growth in
our three-state service territory has averaged five percent versus an industry
average of less than two percent. Based on current commitments from builders,
the projected growth rate for 1999 is also expected to be five percent. Over
thirty percent of our customer base has been added during the 1990s.
27
<PAGE> 38
While primarily a local gas distribution company, the Company has from time
to time acquired and divested itself of other businesses. For example, in April
1996, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Northern Pipeline
Construction Co. ("NPL"), which provides utility companies with trenching and
installation, replacement, and maintenance services for energy distribution
systems. In July 1996, the Company completed the sale of the assets and
liabilities of PriMerit Bank, Federal Savings Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary,
to a subsidiary of Norwest Corporation.
MARKET INFORMATION FOR THE COMPANY
The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific
Stock Exchange. On December 11, 1998, the last trading day before announcement
of the Merger, the market price of the Common Stock was $24.37 per share. The
table below sets forth information on the market price of the Common Stock
during the past five years.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
QUARTER HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First................ $21.50 $17.31 $20.25 $17.25 $18.63 $15.63 $15.25 $13.63 $19.38 $15.75
Second............... 25.00 20.38 19.88 16.13 17.38 15.75 14.88 13.63 18.63 15.00
Third................ 24.50 17.38 20.13 17.75 18.38 14.88 16.75 14.00 18.25 17.50
Fourth............... 26.88(1) 20.19 19.94 17.13 19.88 17.38 18.38 14.88 17.63 13.75
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) The highest market price of the Common Stock during the fourth quarter of
1998 prior to announcement of the Merger was $24.94.
The highest and lowest market price of the Common Stock during the first
quarter of 1999 was $29.00 and $25.25, respectively. The highest and lowest
market price of the Common Stock during the second quarter of 1999 (through June
25, 1999) was $29.50 and $26.88, respectively.
The Company has paid annual dividends of $0.80 per share in 1994 and annual
dividends of $0.82 per share thereafter. For information on the Company's
dividend pay-out ratio, see "Approval of the Merger -- Parties to the
Merger -- Selected Financial Information for the Company" below.
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth certain selected historical consolidated
financial information for the Company. The income statement and balance sheet
data for the Company included in the selected financial data for each of the
five years in the period ended December 31, 1998 are derived from audited
consolidated financial statements for the Company for such five-year period. The
income statement and balance sheet data for the Company included in the selected
financial data for the twelve months ended March 31, 1999 are derived from
unaudited consolidated financial statements for the Company for such period.
This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements of the Company and the related notes thereto, included in the Annual
Report to Shareholders which was previously sent to you, and in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 which are incorporated
by reference in this proxy statement.
28
<PAGE> 39
CONSOLIDATED SELECTED FINANCIAL STATISTICS
(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TWELVE
MONTHS
ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
MARCH 31, --------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating revenues................ $ 932,733 $ 917,309 $ 732,010 $ 644,061 $ 563,502 $ 599,553
Operating expenses................ 791,340 763,139 629,749 572,488 505,090 510,863
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating income.................. $ 141,393 $ 154,170 $ 102,261 $ 71,573 $ 58,412 $ 88,690
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Income from continuing
operations...................... $ 39,850 $ 47,537 $ 16,469 $ 6,574 $ 2,654 $ 23,524
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of tax(1)....... -- -- -- -- (17,536) 2,777
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss)................. $ 39,850 $ 47,537 $ 16,469 $ 6,574 $ (14,882) $ 26,301
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stock.................... $ 39,850 $ 47,537 $ 16,469 $ 6,574 $ (15,189) $ 25,791
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Total assets at period
end..................... $1,786,319 $1,830,694 $1,769,059 $1,560,269 $1,532,527 $1,453,582
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Capitalization at period end
Common equity................... $ 501,231 $ 476,400 $ 385,979 $ 379,616 $ 356,050 $ 348,556
Preferred stock................. -- -- -- -- -- 4,000
Trust originated preferred
securities.................... 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 --
Long-term debt.................. 779,599 812,906 778,693 665,221 607,945 678,263
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$1,340,830 $1,349,306 $1,224,672 $1,104,837 $1,023,995 $1,030,819
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Common stock data
Return on average common
equity........................ 8.8% 11.0% 4.3% 1.8% (4.1)% 7.6%
Earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations......... $ 1.36 $ 1.66 $ 0.61 $ 0.25 $ 0.10 $ 1.09
Discontinued operations....... -- -- -- -- (0.76) 0.13
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Earnings (loss) per share....... $ 1.36 $ 1.66 $ 0.61 $ 0.25 $ (0.66) $ 1.22
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Diluted earnings (loss) per
share......................... $ 1.35 $ 1.65 $ 0.61 $ 0.25 $ (0.66) $ 1.22
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Dividends paid per share........ $ 0.82 $ 0.82 $ 0.82 $ 0.82 $ 0.82 $ 0.80
Payout ratio.................... 60% 49% N/A N/A N/A 66%
Book value per share at period
end........................... $ 16.40 $ 15.67 $ 14.09 $ 14.20 $ 14.55 $ 16.38
Market value per share at period
end........................... $ 27.50 $ 26.63 $ 18.69 $ 19.25 $ 17.63 $ 14.13
Market value per share to book
value per share............... 168% 170% 133% 136% 121% 86%
Common shares outstanding at
period end (000).............. 30,555 30,410 27,387 26,733 24,467 21,282
Number of common shareholders at
period end.................... 24,062 24,489 25,833 26,371 25,133 20,765
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
Continuing operations........... 1.94 2.08 1.28 1.15 1.06 1.69
Adjusted for interest allocated
to discontinued operations.... 1.94 2.08 1.28 1.15 1.05 1.61
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Contribution from the financial services segment, including the 1995 loss on
sale of the Bank.
29
<PAGE> 40
FACTORS WHICH MAY AFFECT FUTURE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMPANY
This section summarizes certain risks of our business that may affect
future financial results. We also periodically file with the SEC documents that
include more information on these risks. It is important for shareholders to
read these documents in deciding how to vote on the Merger. For information on
how to obtain these documents, see "Parties to the Merger -- Where You Can Find
Further Information About the Company" below.
The information set forth below contains certain forward-looking
information which we believe are within the safe-harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking
statements are based upon the belief of management and information currently
available to our management but involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results or experience could differ significantly or be significantly impacted by
different factors than those discussed below.
Our Rate of Return Will Be Adversely Affected if Significant Customer
Growth Continues in Arizona and Nevada. The rates we charge our distribution
customers in Arizona and Nevada are derived using rate base, cost of service and
cost of capital experienced in an historical test year, as adjusted. This
results in "regulatory lag" which delays the Company's recovery of some of the
costs of capital improvements and operating costs from its customers in Arizona
and Nevada. As a result of this regulatory lag, our rate of return in Arizona
and Nevada will be adversely affected during periods of significant growth. The
impact of regulatory lag is mitigated in California by the fact that rates in
California are based upon projections using a future test year. These
projections include estimates of future operating costs.
Certain of Our Capital Expenditures May Be Disallowed by a Commission. In
December 1993, we filed an application with the CPUC to expand our northern
California service territory and to extend service into Truckee, California. The
application proposed a regulatory mechanism for recovering the cost of the
expansion. This application was approved by the CPUC in 1995. In our filing, we
indicated that the expansion would take place in three phases. The first phase
was completed in 1995 on budget. Significant cost overruns were experienced
during the second phase of construction. As a result, we postponed construction
of the third phase in order to reevaluate the economics of completing the
project. In July 1997, we filed an application with the CPUC requesting
modification of the 1995 order in order to permit the Company to recover the
additional costs incurred during the second phase of the project and to modify
the third phase. In January 1998, an all-party settlement was reached. As a
result of the all-party settlement, we agreed to write-off $8 million of the
cost overruns on a pretax basis. The write-off was recorded in December 1997. In
July 1998, the CPUC rejected the all-party settlement and refused to modify the
original order. We are contesting this decision and pursuing alternative
regulatory and legal avenues which we believe offer a reasonable possibility of
modifying the CPUC decision. In April 1999, we negotiated a Settlement Agreement
and Mutual Release Agreement with the Town of Truckee. On June 1, 1999, the
Company, together with the Town of Truckee, filed a joint petition with the CPUC
to modify its previous decisions and to permit the implementation of the
Settlement Agreement. The petition, if approved by the CPUC, would reduce our
regulatory disallowance and exposure from approximately $24 million to
approximately $2 million. As a result, we have not taken any additional
write-offs. If, however, we are unsuccessful in reversing this decision or the
agreement with the Truckee Town Council is not approved by the CPUC, it may be
necessary to write-off up to $24 million of additional expenditures on a pretax
basis.
30
<PAGE> 41
We are not aware of any other potential disallowance of our capital
expenditures by any of our Commissions. We cannot, however, be certain that
disallowances will not occur in the future.
We May Be Adversely Impacted by the Cost of Purchasing Natural Gas During
Periods in Which Natural Gas Prices Are Volatile. Rate schedules in each of our
service areas contain purchased gas adjustment ("PGA") clauses which permit the
Company to file for rate adjustments as the cost of purchased gas changes. These
changes have no direct impact on profit margin, but do affect cash flows and can
therefore impact the amount of the Company's capital resources. Filings to
change rates in accordance with PGA clauses are subject to audit by the staff of
the Commissions.
In 1997, we filed an application with the PUCN for recovery of additional
costs incurred as a result of a substantial run-up in the commodity cost of
natural gas during November and December 1996. In December 1997, the PUCN
disallowed $5.6 million of these costs. This order was overturned upon judicial
review by Nevada's Eighth Judicial District Court on procedural grounds. The
PUCN has appealed the reversal of its order to the Nevada Supreme Court.
In addition, management believes that, due to the nature of the regulatory
process, there is a risk of a disallowance of commodity costs during any period
in which there has been a substantial run-up of the commodity cost of natural
gas.
Our Earnings Are Impacted by the Timing and Amount of Rate Relief. Our
earnings are impacted by the timing and amount of rate relief. The Company does
not currently have any general rate cases on file. The Company has petitioned
the CPUC to delay filing a rate case in California until at least the end of
1999. The Company is not precluded from filing in Arizona or Nevada. We have
also agreed not to file a rate case with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission ("FERC") until December 1999. However, the Company does not currently
anticipate filing any general rate cases while the Merger is pending.
Our Earnings Are Greatly Affected by Variations in Temperature During the
Winter Heating Season. The demand for natural gas is seasonal and is greatly
affected by temperature. Variability in weather from normal temperatures can
materially impact results of operations. On cold days, use of gas by residential
and commercial customers may be as much as eight times greater than on warm days
because of the increased use of gas for space heating. In fact, weather has been
one of the dominant factors in our financial performance in recent years with
record heat in 1995 and 1996 followed by colder than normal weather in the first
half of 1998. In its most recent rate case in Arizona, the Company shifted some
of its operating margin from winter to summer periods by improving rate design.
However, a significant portion of the Company's operating margin remains weather
sensitive.
Our Capital Resources May be Adversely Impacted if Significant Customer
Growth Continues in Our Service Territories. We continue to experience
significant population growth throughout our service territories. This growth
requires large amounts of capital to finance investment in infrastructure in the
form of new transmission and distribution plant to satisfy customer demand. Cash
flows from operating activities (net of dividends) have been inadequate and are
expected to continue to be inadequate to fund all necessary capital
expenditures. We have been funding this shortfall through the issuance of
31
<PAGE> 42
additional debt and equity securities. Our ability to issue additional
securities is dependent upon conditions in the capital markets and the level of
our earnings.
Our Earnings May be Adversely Affected by Competition from Other Suppliers
of Energy and Transporters of Natural Gas. We have been successful in
encouraging builders to install natural gas equipment in new residential and
small commercial projects in our service territories. We have also been
successful in retaining large commercial, industrial and electric generation
customers by setting rates at levels competitive with alternative sources such
as electricity, fuel oils and coal. In addition, we have been successful in
retaining transportation customers located in close proximity to other
interstate pipelines through the use of discounted transportation contract
rates, special long-term contracts with electric generation and co-generation
customers and new tariff programs. However, both the CPUC and PUCN are in the
process of developing new rules for restructuring the natural gas industries to
allow more competition. It is anticipated that similar initiatives will be
undertaken in Arizona. We do not yet have sufficient information to predict what
impact these types of rules may have on our ability to compete for customers in
the future. There is, however, the risk that the cost of competition may be
borne largely by shareholders while the "upside" potential of competition will
be limited by continued rate regulation.
It Is Likely That the Company will Be Impacted by Consolidation in the
Natural Gas and Electric Industries. There is also beginning to be consolidation
of local distribution systems in the natural gas and electric utility
industries. It is therefore likely that we will face larger competitors and
different competitive threats in the future than we have experienced in the
past.
The Impact of Economic Conditions is Uncertain. Our ability to finance
capital expenditures and other matters will depend upon general economic
conditions in the capital markets. Interest rates declined during 1998.
Declining interest rates are generally believed to be favorable for utilities
because of their high capital costs. On the other hand, our authorized rate of
return could be reduced by one or more of the Commissions because of lower
interest rates.
Customer growth tends to increase during periods of favorable economic
conditions and may slow, if economic conditions become unfavorable or more
uncertain. If customer growth slows, our earnings in the short run should be
positively impacted. On the other hand, the long-term benefits of an expanding
service territory, which may be attractive to a potential acquirer, could be
lost if the economic downturn is long and pervasive.
Our Ability to Pay Dividends, Although Restricted by California Law, Is
Likely to Continue to Be Dependent upon Future Earnings. We do not anticipate
that restrictions imposed by California law will impact our ability to pay
dividends in the foreseeable future. However, during three of our past five
years, the amount paid out in dividends has exceeded earnings during these three
years by an aggregate of $37 million. As a result, it is likely that the amount
of dividends declared by the Company's Board of Directors will depend to a
substantial degree on the level of the Company's future earnings.
The Interest of Other Parties in Acquiring the Company Will Be
Significantly Affected by Public Utility Regulation. Because of restrictions
imposed by the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 ("PUHCA") on
multi-state utility operations, it is impracticable for many public utilities in
a holding company structure or a public utility
32
<PAGE> 43
that would become a holding company as a result of the acquisition of the
Company to acquire the Company.
In addition, under existing practices of the Commissions, it is likely that
a potential acquirer will be limited in its ability to recover the premium paid
over the book value of the Company in rates. At March 31, 1999, the Company had
a book value per share of $16.40, $13.60 per share less than the Merger
Consideration.
The Market Price of Our Common Stock May Be Adversely Affected if the
Merger is not Completed. During 1998, several analyst reports stated that the
Company was a likely takeover target. As a result, management believes that the
Company's stock price in 1998 included a "merger premium." In addition, the
market price of the Common Stock has increased from $24.37 per share on the date
preceding the announcement of the Merger to a range of a high of $29.50 per
share to a low of $25.25 per share since the announcement of the Merger. If the
Merger is not completed, management believes that it is likely that the
Company's stock price will fall.
Our Computer and Operating Systems Could Be Adversely Impacted by the "Y2K"
Problem. We are currently addressing the effect of the Year 2000 on our computer
systems and operations. We are also addressing operational risks related to our
suppliers and vendors and developing contingency plans in order to mitigate this
risk. The Y2K problem arises because most companies have computer systems or
embedded devices that use two digits to identify a year in the date field (e.g.,
"99" for 1999). These systems must be modified to handle turn-of-the-century
calculations. If not corrected, system failures or miscalculations could occur.
We have not currently experienced significant costs with respect to addressing
these issues and do not anticipate any material disruption to our business
operations. Our operations could, however, be impacted, if despite our efforts
and our current expectations:
- we are unable to resolve or fail to identify all material Y2K problems
prior to January 1, 2000;
- any of our critical suppliers and vendors, such as suppliers of natural
gas or electricity, are unable to resolve or fail to identify all
material Y2K problems affecting our business prior to January 1, 2000; or
- we are unable to mitigate or fail to address all operational risks in our
contingency plans.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY
As required by law, the Company files reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information
contain additional information about the Company. You can inspect and copy these
materials at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the
following Regional Offices of the SEC: 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400,
Chicago, Illinois 60661; and 7 World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New
York 10048. For further information concerning the SEC's public reference rooms,
you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Some of this information may also be
accessed on the World Wide Web through the SEC's Internet address at
http://www.sec.gov.
33
<PAGE> 44
The SEC allows the Company to "incorporate by reference" information into
this proxy statement, which means that the Company can disclose important
information by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC.
Information incorporated by reference is considered part of this proxy
statement, except to the extent that the information is superseded by
information in this proxy statement. This proxy statement incorporates by
reference the information contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and the Company's Current Reports
on Form 8-K filed on February 11, 1999, April 28, 1999 and May 4, 1999
previously filed by the Company with the SEC.
The Company also incorporates by reference the information contained in all
other documents the Company files with the SEC after the date of this proxy
statement and before the Annual Meeting. The information contained in any such
document will be considered part of this proxy statement from the date the
document is filed.
If you are a shareholder of the Company and would like to receive a copy of
any document incorporated by reference into this proxy statement (which will not
include any of the exhibits to the document other than those exhibits that are
themselves specifically incorporated by reference into this proxy statement),
you should call or write to Investor Relations, Southwest Gas Corporation, P.O.
Box 98510, Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-8510 (telephone: (702) 876-7237). In order to
ensure timely delivery of the documents you request, you should make your
request by July 22, 1999. A copy of the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders
for the year ended December 31, 1998 has been previously provided to you.
ONEOK
ONEOK is an integrated energy company with historical roots in natural gas
transmission and local distribution. Its predecessor was formed in 1906 as
Oklahoma Natural Gas Company. By December, 1980, Oklahoma Natural Gas' overall
activities had evolved beyond its corporate name so the corporate name was
changed to ONEOK, Inc., but gas distribution customers continued to be served
under the name Oklahoma Natural Gas Company, as a division of ONEOK.
In 1997, ONEOK completed a strategic alliance with Western Resources, Inc.
in which ONEOK acquired all of Western's natural gas business which included the
largest gas distribution operations in Kansas. It operates as a division of the
corporation under the name Kansas Gas Service Company.
ONEOK is organized into regulated and non-regulated business operations.
Its regulated operations are its core business. Distribution operations are
conducted through Oklahoma Natural Gas Company and Kansas Gas Service Company,
serving approximately 1.4 million gas distribution customers. Transmission and
storage operations are conducted primarily through ONEOK Gas Transportation,
L.L.C. in Oklahoma and Mid Continent Market Center, Inc. in Kansas. These
operations are primarily regulated by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission and
the Kansas Corporation Commission.
The non-regulated businesses consist of the following operations:
- marketing natural gas;
- providing services to producers, including gas gathering services;
34
<PAGE> 45
- extracting and selling natural gas liquids; and
- producing oil and gas.
These activities are conducted primarily through five subsidiary companies;
ONEOK Gas Marketing Company, ONEOK Producer Services, L.L.C., ONEOK Gas
Processing, L.L.C., ONEOK Field Services Company and ONEOK Resources Company.
These operations grew from 5 to 22 percent of ONEOK and subsidiary operating
income before tax in the last four years.
We have been informed by ONEOK that it intends to finance the Merger
through the issuance of approximately $714 million of notes and $250 million of
trust preferred securities.
ONEOK common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
trading symbol of OKE.
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ONEOK
The following table sets forth certain selected historical consolidated
financial information for ONEOK. The statement of income and balance sheet data
for ONEOK included in the selected consolidated financial information for each
of the five years in the period ended August 31, 1998 are derived from the
related audited consolidated financial statements for ONEOK.
The statement of income and balance sheet data for ONEOK included in the
selected consolidated financial information for the six months ended February
28, 1999 and 1998 are derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements
for ONEOK for such periods. We have been informed that the interim consolidated
financial statements of ONEOK reflect all adjustments that, in the opinion of
management of ONEOK, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for
the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. Due to the seasonal nature of ONEOK's business, the results of
operations for the six months ended February 28, 1999 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended August 31,
1999.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31,
------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating revenues.................. $ 972.6 $1,036.2 $1,835.4 $1,161.9 $1,224.3 $ 954.2 $ 784.1
Income before interest and income
taxes............................. $ 160.1 $ 159.7 $ 203.5 $ 128.8 $ 121.0 $ 105.5 $ 92.0
Net income.......................... $ 82.8 $ 86.4 $ 101.8 $ 59.3 $ 52.8 $ 42.8 $ 36.2
Total assets (period end)........... $2,696.8 $2,334.8 $2,422.5 $1,237.4 $1,219.9 $1,181.2 $1,148.1
Long-term debt (period end)......... $ 549.5 $ 343.3 $ 329.3 $ 347.1 $ 351.9 $ 363.9 $ 376.9
Diluted earnings per common share... $ 1.60 $ 2.17 $ 2.23 $ 2.13 $ 1.93 $ 1.58 $ 1.34
Dividends per common share.......... $ .62 $ .60 $ 1.20 $ 1.20 $ 1.18 $ 1.12 $ 1.11
Percent of payout................... 38.8% 27.6% 53.8% 56.2% 61.1% 70.9% 82.8%
Common equity per share............. $ 20.46 $ 19.69 $ 19.01 $ 16.47 $ 15.21 $ 14.38 $ 13.88
Return on common equity............. 9.90% 12.44% 12.46% 12.75% 12.64% 10.90% 9.65%
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges........................... 6.58x 7.86x 5.50x 3.51x 3.28x 2.70x 2.52x
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
charges and preferred stock
dividend requirement.............. 2.93x 5.46x 2.52x 3.48x 3.24x 2.67x 2.49x
</TABLE>
35
<PAGE> 46
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ONEOK
As required by law, ONEOK files reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information
contain additional information about ONEOK. You can inspect and copy these
materials at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the
following Regional Offices of the SEC: 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400,
Chicago, Illinois 60661; and 7 World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New
York 10048. For further information concerning the SEC's public reference rooms,
you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Some of this information may also be
accessed on the World Wide Web through the SEC's Internet address at
http://www.sec.gov.
All information regarding ONEOK in this proxy statement has been supplied
by ONEOK. ONEOK has represented to the Company that this information is true and
correct.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board recommends a vote FOR approval of the principal terms of the
Merger Agreement.
For information regarding the Board's consideration of the Merger and
rejection of the offer from Southern Union, see "Background of the Merger",
"Reasons for the Merger" and "Opinion of Financial Advisor" below.
The officers and directors of the Company own shares of the Company and
other interests in the Common Stock and, to that extent, their interest in the
Merger is the same as yours. However, some members of the Board and management
of the Company have other interests that are different from yours. These
interests are described below under "Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger." Each of the Board members was aware of these interests and considered
them in recommending and approving the Merger and the terms of the Merger
Agreement.
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER
The Company engaged Merrill Lynch on January 16, 1996 to provide the
Company advice with respect to merger and acquisition transactions and a
financial evaluation of the Company. In the spring of 1996, following the
announcement of the proposed sale of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company,
PriMerit Bank, to Norwest Corporation, the management of the Company began to
review with the Board changes that were taking place in the natural gas and
electric utility industries, noting that in order for the Company to survive in
the anticipated restructured utility environment, the Company would need to
become larger and financially stronger or become part of a larger and
financially stronger organization. Management of the Company also began
exploring a variety of possible transactions, including a merger of equals, an
acquisition of the Company by another party or the acquisition by the Company of
all or a portion of the assets of another party.
During the second quarter of 1996, Mr. Maffie, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, had exploratory discussions with two western
public utilities regarding the possibility of a transaction. A further
conversation was held with one of these utilities
36
<PAGE> 47
during the third quarter of 1996. Follow-up conversations were held with the
other utility in the second and third quarters of 1997. There have been no
subsequent conversations with either of these public utilities, one of which has
announced a transaction with another western public utility. No confidential
information was ever exchanged.
In the summer of 1996, the Company was approached by the chief executive
officer of another large electric utility (the "LEU") regarding a potential
acquisition of the Company. A number of discussions were held during that year
at the senior executive level regarding such an acquisition. In the fall of
1996, the Company entered into a confidentiality agreement with the LEU. The
Company provided the LEU with non-public information regarding the Company,
including a 10-year financial forecast. In March 1997, merger discussions broke
off with the LEU because of substantially different views on price. However, the
Company continued to discuss the possibility of a strategic alliance with the
LEU. These discussions broke off in March 1998 because of management's view that
the potential rewards of an alliance with the LEU were less than the potential
associated risks and costs. No further discussions have taken place regarding a
possible business combination with the LEU.
During the summer of 1996, Merrill Lynch orally provided management with
its views regarding a range of values for the Company's Common Stock, subject to
a number of qualifications. Mr. Maffie also had exploratory conversations with
another western public utility and an independent power producer during the
second half of 1996.
Mr. Maffie had subsequent discussions with the independent power producer
during the first and second quarters of 1997. Confidential information was
provided to the independent power producer during this period. Discussions broke
off because of substantially different views on price and no further discussions
have taken place. The independent power producer has since entered into a
transaction with another public utility.
During the first quarter of 1997, Mr. Maffie had exploratory conversations
with three public utilities, one of which was ONEOK, and a governmental agency.
No subsequent conversations were held with either of the other two public
utilities and no confidential information was exchanged. A follow-up
conversation was held with the governmental agency in the second quarter of
1997. There have been no subsequent discussions with the governmental agency and
no confidential information has been exchanged.
In May of 1997, Mr. Maffie had a follow up conversation with ONEOK and
exploratory conversations with another public utility. Conversations with ONEOK
and the other utility continued in 1997. The Company entered into a
confidentiality agreement with the other utility regarding a possible
acquisition by the Company of certain of the utility's assets in 1997. One
further conversation was held with this public utility in the second quarter of
1998. This public utility has since agreed to be acquired by another public
utility.
At the regular meeting of the Board of Directors in January 1998, Merrill
Lynch provided the Board with an overview of merger and acquisition activity in
the gas and electric utility industries and reviewed a number of recent
successful and unsuccessful transactions.
At the regular meeting of the Board of Directors in March 1998, the
Company's management again reviewed with the Board changes that were taking
place in the natural gas and electric utility industries. Management also
reviewed with the Board a number of
37
<PAGE> 48
business combinations taking place involving utilities located west of the
Mississippi River. In addition, management discussed potential merger partners
and described exploratory merger conversations between certain of these
potential merger partners and Company management.
In the spring of 1998, Mr. Maffie had further conversations with ONEOK and
exploratory conversations with one other southwestern public utility regarding a
possible business combination. There have been no further conversations with
this other public utility and no confidential information was ever exchanged.
The conversations with ONEOK broke off in May 1998.
The Company resumed discussions with ONEOK in mid-September 1998 regarding
a merger of the Company and ONEOK. At this time, Mr. Maffie also had several
exploratory conversations with a midwestern utility regarding a possible
transaction. There have been no further conversations with the midwestern
utility since the fall of 1998 and no confidential information was ever
exchanged.
The Company requested Merrill Lynch to advise it in connection with a
possible transaction with ONEOK in September 1998. ONEOK, through its investment
bankers, then proposed a transaction in which ONEOK would acquire all the
outstanding shares of the Company for cash at a higher price than had been
previously discussed. The parties then discussed other business terms.
A meeting of the Board of Directors was held on November 16, 1998 to
consider ONEOK's proposal. Merrill Lynch reviewed with the Board certain
preliminary information regarding the value of the Company using a variety of
valuation techniques and an analysis of a potential merger with ONEOK. The
Company's outside legal advisors summarized the duties of the Board when
considering transactions of this type. In addition, Mr. Maffie informed the
Board that ONEOK had asked that he resign on the effective date of the proposed
merger. It was, however, contemplated that he would enter into a consulting
contract with ONEOK. Mr. Maffie also indicated that ONEOK contemplated entering
into an employment agreement with Mr. Biehl to be effective after the proposed
merger. The terms of this employment agreement are substantially similar to the
terms of the employment agreement between Mr. Biehl and the Company. The meeting
reconvened the next morning. After discussion and a consideration of the
interests of Company management, the Board authorized management to pursue
further discussions with ONEOK.
A Confidentiality Agreement was executed by the Company and ONEOK on
November 20, 1998 and ONEOK commenced a due diligence review of the Company on
November 30, 1998. A proposed form of merger agreement was delivered to the
Company and its legal and financial advisors by ONEOK over the Thanksgiving
holiday weekend.
A meeting was held in Las Vegas, Nevada on December 2 and December 3, 1998
to discuss the terms of the proposed agreement. Revised drafts of the agreement
were circulated by ONEOK shortly after the meeting. Discussion of open business
issues continued throughout the week of December 7, 1998 and revised drafts of
the proposed agreement and disclosure schedules were circulated. During this
week ONEOK agreed to:
- increase the offered consideration to $28.50 per share from the $28.00
per share previously discussed;
38
<PAGE> 49
- decrease the requested termination fee from 5% of the offered
consideration to $30 million; and
- eliminate its request for the Company to reimburse it for expenses in the
event the Merger is not consummated.
A notice of a special meeting of the Board, including a draft of the
proposed form of agreement and a summary of agreement terms, was sent to the
Board of Directors of the Company on December 9, 1998. A final due diligence
call was held on Sunday, December 13, 1998 to discuss issues raised by the
disclosure schedules and to resolve remaining business issues.
A special meeting of the Board of Directors was held on December 14, 1998
for the purpose of considering the proposed merger agreement. The Company's
outside legal advisors made presentations regarding the principal terms of the
merger agreement (including the resolution of open business issues). Merrill
Lynch made presentations regarding the Company, ONEOK and valuations of the
Company using different valuation techniques. Merrill Lynch rendered an oral
opinion (subsequently confirmed in writing on that date) to the Board of
Directors to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to
matters stated in such opinion, the consideration of $28.50 per share in cash to
be received by the Company's shareholders from ONEOK was fair to the Company's
shareholders from a financial point of view.
Following the presentations by the Company's legal and financial advisors,
the two inside directors, Messrs. Maffie and Biehl, were excused. The Company's
outside legal advisors summarized the terms of the arrangements between ONEOK
and each of the inside directors. After discussion of these arrangements and the
principal terms of the proposed merger agreement, the outside directors
unanimously approved the terms of the merger agreement. The inside directors
were then asked to return and the entire Board unanimously approved the
principal terms of the proposed merger agreement. The Merger Agreement was
thereafter executed and delivered.
The Company received an unsolicited written offer dated February 1, 1999
from Southern Union to acquire the Company for $32.00 per share in cash and
stating that the offer was otherwise upon substantially the same terms as the
merger agreement executed by the Company and ONEOK on December 14, 1998.
The Company had not been aware of Southern Union's interest in acquiring
the Company until receipt of this offer. Mr. Maffie had previously had two
conversations with George Lindemann, the Chairman of the Board and a principal
shareholder of Southern Union, in 1995 regarding a buy-out and break-up of the
Company. There were no subsequent conversations between the Company and Southern
Union in 1995. There were no discussions between management of the Company and
Southern Union during 1996, 1997 or 1998 regarding its possible interest in a
transaction with the Company nor had Southern Union been identified by Merrill
Lynch, because of Southern Union's small size, as a party Merrill Lynch believed
would be likely to have an interest in pursuing a strategic transaction with the
Company. The Company was, however, approached by Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
Securities Corporation ("DLJ") regarding business combinations generally in May
1998. The Company had no subsequent contact with DLJ regarding any business
combination until February 1999, when the Company was informed that DLJ was
acting as a financial advisor to Southern Union.
39
<PAGE> 50
A special Board meeting was held on February 8, 1999 to consider the offer
from Southern Union. The Company's outside legal advisors reviewed with the
Board the duties of the Board in situations of this type.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company is not permitted to
engage in discussions regarding another offer, unless the Board concludes that
the proposal is a "Superior Proposal" as defined in the Merger Agreement. A
proposal is a "Superior Proposal" if:
- the offer is financially superior;
- the offeror appears reasonably likely to have the funds necessary to
consummate the proposed transaction; and
- failing to engage in discussions with the offeror would create a
possibility of a breach of the fiduciary duties of the Board under
applicable law.
The Board concluded that the offer of $32.00 per share in cash was
financially superior to $28.50 per share in cash. Merrill Lynch then advised the
Board that it was unable to conclude that Southern Union appeared reasonably
likely to have the funds necessary to consummate the proposed transaction on the
basis of the limited information in the offer and publicly available
information. After discussion, the Board authorized management to inform
Southern Union that it was unable to conclude that Southern Union was reasonably
likely to have the funds necessary to consummate the proposed transaction due to
the limited information available.
Following the February 8, 1999 Board meeting, Merrill Lynch received
additional information from DLJ regarding the manner in which Southern Union
intended to finance its proposed acquisition of the Company. A special Board
meeting was held on February 18, 1999 to consider this additional information.
Based on the information provided by DLJ, Merrill Lynch stated that, in its
view, the proposed plan to finance the transaction on a highly leveraged basis
was credible from a financial perspective and that, based upon then-current
market, economic and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on,
and the information made available to Merrill Lynch as of such date, it appeared
Southern Union was reasonably likely, as of such date, to have the funds
necessary to acquire all of the outstanding stock of the Company at $32.00 per
share in cash on that basis. The Board requested additional time to consider the
Southern Union offer before making a decision on this issue.
On February 21, 1999, the Company held a special Board meeting to
reconsider the offer from Southern Union. The Company's outside legal advisors
again reviewed with the directors the findings that must be made prior to the
Board entering into discussions with Southern Union. Merrill Lynch reviewed with
the Board the information that had been provided to it by DLJ and its view that,
based upon then-current market, economic and other conditions as they existed
and could be evaluated on, and the information made available to Merrill Lynch
as of such date, it appeared Southern Union was reasonably likely, as of such
date, to have the funds necessary to consummate the proposed transaction. The
Board determined that the Southern Union proposal was a "Superior Proposal" as
defined in the Merger Agreement. The Company's Board then authorized management
to enter into a confidentiality agreement with Southern Union and thereafter to
commence discussions with Southern Union.
40
<PAGE> 51
The Company and Southern Union executed a confidentiality agreement in
substantially the same form as the Confidentiality Agreement executed by the
Company with ONEOK, thereby enabling the Company and Southern Union to exchange
information and to commence discussions regarding a possible acquisition of the
Company on a confidential basis.
On February 25 - 27, 1999, representatives of Southern Union visited the
Company's offices to conduct due diligence. At the end of this period, Southern
Union complimented the Company on its cooperativeness and openness and informed
the Company that it had completed its due diligence.
On February 26, 1999, the Company provided Southern Union with a list of
questions and information requests regarding certain of the substantive issues
which the Company believed affected the regulatory feasibility of the proposed
transaction, including a request for a definitive financing plan which took into
account the need to raise additional equity in order to address regulatory
concerns. On March 1, 1999, the Company received a partial response from
Southern Union to its questions and information requests. Additional information
was provided to the Company by Southern Union on March 2.
On March 8, 1999, the Company received Southern Union's comments on
proposed revisions to the Merger Agreement and a disclosure schedule for
Southern Union. On March 11, 1999, after reviewing Southern Union's responses to
the Company's questions and information requests, the Company again requested a
written financing plan from Southern Union which took into account regulatory
concerns, and other additional information. On March 15, 1999, Southern Union
responded to the Company's request for a definitive financing plan and pro forma
financial information. Southern Union informed the Company that any additional
due diligence would need to be done at Southern Union's offices.
On March 16, 1999, Southern Union proposed additional revisions to the
agreement and plan of merger between the Company and Southern Union (the
"Southern Union Agreement") to address certain of the Company's financing and
regulatory concerns. On March 18, 1999, the Company received a proposed form of
commitment to be executed by certain members of the Lindemann family in favor of
Southern Union to "backstop" up to $200 million of Southern Union's obligation
to issue additional equity (the "Partial Equity Backstop").
During the period from March 23 - 26, 1999, the Company was given an
opportunity to review certain documents at Southern Union's offices in Austin,
Texas and Kansas City, Missouri in order to obtain additional information on
Southern Union's operational history and financing plan and any regulatory
issues that might be raised by that operational history or financing plan. The
Company also visited with the public counsel in Missouri, eight members of the
staff of the Missouri Public Service Commission (the "Missouri Commission") and
two members of the Missouri Commission in order to better understand the
regulatory approval process for a Southern Union/Company transaction in
Missouri.
On March 29, 1999, the Company transmitted to Southern Union a proposed
Standby Stock Purchase Agreement to be executed by the Company and certain
members of the Lindemann family in lieu of the form of Partial Equity Backstop
proposed by Southern Union. On April 2, 1999, the Company received comments from
Southern Union on the proposed Standby Stock Purchase Agreement.
A special meeting of the Company's Board was held on April 5, 6 and 7,
1999.
41
<PAGE> 52
On April 5, 1999, management reviewed historical financial data for the
Company, Southern Union and ONEOK. In addition, management reviewed pro forma
financial information for post-merger operations for both Southern Union and
ONEOK from both a financing and regulatory perspective, taking into account the
financing plan proposed by ONEOK and the definitive financing plan proposed by
Southern Union. Merrill Lynch then reviewed with the Board Southern Union's
financing plan, market performance, the nature of its shareholders and other
factors affecting the ability of Southern Union to finance the transaction.
Merrill Lynch also provided the Board with an overview of the two proposed
transactions and a comparison of the consequences of the two transactions.
On April 6th, the Company's management summarized the results of the
Company's regulatory due diligence of Southern Union. Management's presentations
were followed by presentations from:
- James Fischer, the Company's special regulatory counsel in Missouri and a
former vice chairman and member of the Missouri Commission and a former
public counsel in Missouri, regarding Southern Union's regulatory history
in Missouri and issues that he believed would be of concern to the
Missouri Commission and the timing for obtaining approval from the
Missouri Commission;
- Jo Ann Kelly, the Company's regulatory consultant in Nevada and former
member of the PUCN, regarding issues that she believed would be of
concern to the PUCN;
- Greg Patterson, the Director of the Residential Utility Consumer Office
("RUCO") in Arizona, regarding issues that he believed would be of
concern to RUCO and the ACC and the timing for obtaining approvals from
the ACC; and
- Daniel Fessler, the Company's special regulatory counsel in California
and former President of the CPUC, regarding issues that he believed would
be of concern to the CPUC and the timing for obtaining approvals from the
CPUC.
Southern Union had previously requested to be allowed to make a
presentation to the Company's Board. On April 6, 1999, nine representatives from
Southern Union were present for the presentation, including three members of
Southern Union's management, including George Lindemann, the chairman of the
board of Southern Union, a principal shareholder and head of the family that
proposed to provide the Partial Equity Backstop, Southern Union's outside
counsel, Southern Union's general regulatory counsel, Southern Union's Missouri
counsel, two representatives of DLJ and another member of Southern Union's Board
who is also a named partner in Southern Union's outside law firm. Southern Union
provided a general overview of Southern Union, information on Southern Union's
financing plan and its views on its ability to obtain all necessary regulatory
approvals in a timely manner.
ONEOK had previously requested that it be given an opportunity to address
the Board. On April 7, 1999 three representatives of ONEOK were present at the
meeting, two members of ONEOK's management and a representative of ONEOK's
financial adviser, PaineWebber Incorporated. ONEOK provided the Board a general
overview of ONEOK and the status of regulatory proceedings in Arizona,
California and Nevada. ONEOK, through its financial advisors, also informed the
Board that ONEOK was willing
42
<PAGE> 53
to consider an increase in its offer to $30 per share subject to approval by the
ONEOK Board and termination of negotiations with Southern Union.
A special meeting of the Board was held on April 12, 1999. The purpose of
the meeting was to determine whether to proceed with negotiation of the terms of
a definitive agreement with Southern Union or to proceed to a vote on whether to
accept or reject the current Southern Union offer on the basis of the proposed
agreement offered by Southern Union and information previously provided to the
Board. The Board then discussed additional terms of an agreement with Southern
Union which might address some of the Board's concerns regarding the ability of
Southern Union to finance the transaction in a manner that would be acceptable
to the regulators, other regulatory concerns and other perceived risks. After
further discussion, the Board authorized management to attempt to negotiate
additional contractual provisions with Southern Union which would mitigate the
higher risks of non-consummation of a transaction with Southern Union.
On April 12, 1999, the Company transmitted to Southern Union a revised
draft of the Southern Union Agreement and Standby Stock Purchase Agreement. In
addition, the Company transmitted drafts of the following agreements which
Southern Union had indicated in its February 1, 1999 letter were acceptable to
Southern Union: a consulting agreement with Mr. Maffie which was in
substantially the same form as the consulting agreement between ONEOK and Mr.
Maffie, a draft of the employment agreement with Mr. Biehl which was in
substantially the same form as the employment agreement between ONEOK and Mr.
Biehl and Assumption Agreements which were in substantially the same form as the
Assumption Agreements executed by certain executive officers of the Company and
ONEOK. (See "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" for a description of
these agreements.)
On April 14, 1999, the Company transmitted to Southern Union an updated
Company disclosure schedule. On the same date, the Company received a request
from Southern Union for additional information on the proposed Southern Union
Agreement and Standby Stock Purchase Agreement. The Company responded to
Southern Union's request.
On April 16, 1999, the Company received Southern Union's comments on the
Southern Union Agreement and Standby Stock Purchase Agreement. Southern Union
also requested that its comments be provided directly to the Company's Board.
These comments were included in the Board package for the Company's April 22nd
meeting.
On April 20, 1999, the Company responded to Southern Union's comments on
the Southern Union Agreement and the Standby Stock Purchase Agreement. On April
22, 1999, the Company received Southern Union's response to the Company's
comments, including the response to the Company's request for Southern Union to
provide it with its "best and final price".
A special meeting of the Board was held on April 22, 1999 to consider
Southern Union's offer and the proposed terms of the Southern Union Agreement
and Standby Stock Purchase Agreement. The Board was provided with copies of
Southern Union's responses to the comments of Company management on the Southern
Union Agreement and the Standby Stock Purchase Agreement and additional
information requested by Southern Union.
The Company's outside legal advisors summarized the status of the
negotiations with Southern Union and the unresolved issues with Southern Union.
Management and Merrill Lynch presented various analyses regarding the Southern
Union and ONEOK proposals.
43
<PAGE> 54
After discussion, the Board authorized management to negotiate an amendment to
the Merger Agreement with ONEOK to reflect a purchase price of $30 per share in
cash, among other things.
A special meeting of the Board was held on April 25, 1999. The Company's
outside legal advisors reviewed with the Board the proposed amendment to the
Merger Agreement, which included a price of $30 per share. After discussion the
Board unanimously approved the proposed amendment to the Merger Agreement and,
subject to execution of the amendment by ONEOK, rejected the Southern Union
proposal.
On April 27, 1999, Southern Union announced that it had increased its offer
to acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company to $33.50 per share in
cash, plus interest at an annual rate of 3.55% after February 14, 2000. Southern
Union thereafter provided the Company with a copy of its revised offer. In
addition to the changes in the pricing terms, Southern Union informed the
Company's Board that the offer was based upon an acceptance of the terms of the
Southern Union Agreement, as modified by Southern Union's comments on April 16th
and April 22nd.
A special meeting of the Board was held on May 4, 1999 for the purpose of
considering Southern Union's revised offer. Management reviewed with the Board
events which had taken place since the last meeting of the Board. The Board
reviewed in detail the terms of Southern Union's proposal.
After further discussion, all members of the Board unanimously approved
rejection of the Southern Union offer for the reasons set forth below.
On May 10, 1999, the Company engaged Goldman Sachs & Co. ("Goldman Sachs"),
pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement between the Company and Goldman
Sachs, to act as its financial advisor, together with Merrill Lynch, in
connection with the possible sale of the Company to ONEOK and actions that may
be taken by Southern Union with respect to the Company. Pursuant to the terms of
the letter agreement, the Company agreed to pay Goldman Sachs (1) a fee of $1
million upon execution of the engagement letter, (2) an additional fee of $1
million payable upon the approval by the Company's shareholders of an
acquisition of a majority of the Company's Common Stock or an acquisition of
substantially all of the assets of the Company by ONEOK or by Southern Union and
(3) upon consummation of any such transaction, a fee of approximately $4
million, against which any fees previously paid to Goldman Sachs pursuant to
clauses (1) and (2) above will be credited. The Company also has agreed to
reimburse Goldman Sachs for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (including the
fees and disbursements of legal counsel) and to indemnify Goldman Sachs and
certain related parties from and against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the federal securities laws arising out of its engagement.
For information on the status of regulatory proceedings, see "Regulatory
Matters." For information on litigation which might affect the Merger, see
"Litigation Affecting the Merger."
44
<PAGE> 55
REASONS FOR THE MERGER
In reaching their conclusion to approve the Merger and the Merger Agreement
and to reject the offer from Southern Union, the directors of the Company
considered the following information:
- presentations by the Company's management during the past several years
regarding the business, operations, financial condition, business
strategy and prospects of the Company;
- presentations by the Company's management and representatives of Merrill
Lynch regarding changes in the gas and electric utility industries, the
regulatory environment and merger and acquisition trends;
- presentations by the Company's management regarding contacts with other
potentially interested parties during the past several years;
- financial presentations by Merrill Lynch (including the assumptions and
methodologies underlying the financial information presented) and the
written opinion of Merrill Lynch to the effect that, as of December 14,
1998, the consideration to be received by the Company's shareholders
pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement was fair to the Company's
shareholders from a financial point of view (See "Opinion of Financial
Advisor");
- presentations by Merrill Lynch regarding the Company, ONEOK and
valuations of the Company using different valuation techniques;
- presentations by and discussions with the Company's legal advisers in
November and December 1998 regarding the duties and obligations of the
Board in considering transactions of this type and in February, March and
April 1999 regarding the duties and obligations of the Board in
considering unsolicited offers;
- discussions of the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement,
including the amendment to the Merger Agreement with senior executives of
the Company, representatives of the Company's legal counsel and
representatives of Merrill Lynch;
- discussion of the terms and conditions of the proposed Southern Union
Agreement with senior executives of the Company, representatives of the
Company's legal counsel and representatives of Merrill Lynch;
- presentations by and discussions with representatives of the Company's
legal counsel regarding interests of the Company's inside directors (see
"Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger -- Interests of Inside
Directors");
- presentations by and discussions with the Company's management and
representatives of Merrill Lynch regarding a comparison of ONEOK's and
Southern Union's financial condition, business, capital structure,
prospects, financing plan and regulatory issues;
- presentations by and discussions with management and the Company's
regulatory experts in Arizona, California, Missouri and Nevada;
- presentations by and discussions with representatives of Southern Union;
- presentations by and discussions with representatives of ONEOK;
45
<PAGE> 56
- information provided by Southern Union directly for consideration by the
Board; and
- actions taken and statements made by Southern Union.
The information provided to the Board for its consideration was, in some
instances, conflicting. Each member of the Board considered the conflicting
information, the credibility of the source of information and the credibility of
the information in light of his or her business experience. Each of the Board
members considered and weighed this information differently.
The Board, in making its determinations that the Merger and the Merger
Agreement are in the best interests of the Company's shareholders, considered
the following factors, which constitute all of the material factors considered
by the Board:
- the Board's belief that, due to changes in the natural gas and electric
utility industries, the Company's financial position and the likelihood
that there would continue to be significant growth in the Company's
service territories, a business combination with a financially stronger
company would give the Company's shareholders the opportunity to realize
immediately the future value of the Company's long-term growth prospects
without the financial and regulatory risks associated with that growth;
- the Board's belief that it was likely that the earnings of the Company
and, as a result the price that an acquirer would be willing to pay for
the Company (particularly when considered as a multiple of book value)
would continue to be adversely affected by regulatory lag and the cost of
financing customer growth in the Company's service territories; for
information on regulatory lag and the costs associated with financing
customer growth, see "Parties to the Merger -- Factors Which May Affect
Future Performance of the Company";
- the Merger Consideration represents a 54% premium over the closing price
of the Company's Common Stock on September 15, 1998 (the approximate date
the Company's discussions with ONEOK moved beyond the exploratory stage)
and a 23% premium over the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on
December 11, 1998, the last trading day before the announcement of the
Merger;
- the Board's belief that the analysis and opinion of Merrill Lynch
supported the Board's conclusion that the Merger Consideration is fair
from a financial point of view to, and in the best interests of, the
Company's shareholders;
- the provisions of the Merger Agreement that were structured so as (i) to
accommodate additional bona fide unsolicited offers to acquire the
Company and specifically to permit the Board to provide information to
and negotiate with other interested parties and (ii) to enable the Board
to terminate the Merger Agreement and accept a better offer, subject to
the payment of a $30 million termination fee and compliance with the
other provisions of the "no-solicitation" covenant (see "Summary of the
Merger Agreement -- No Solicitation by the Company" and "Summary of the
Merger Agreement -- Termination of the Merger Agreement" and "Payment of
Fees and Expenses");
- provisions of the Merger Agreement that are structured so as to permit
the Company to terminate the Merger Agreement if Merrill Lynch were
unable to deliver an opinion that, as of the date of this proxy
statement, the consideration to
46
<PAGE> 57
be received by the Company's shareholders pursuant to the terms of the
Merger Agreement was fair to the Company's shareholders from a financial
point of view;
- the financial condition of ONEOK and the fact that the Merger Agreement
does not contain a financing condition to the obligation of ONEOK to
consummate the Merger, absent significant disruptions in the financial
and capital markets (see "Financing of the Merger" and "Summary of the
Merger Agreement -- Conditions to the Merger");
- the Board's belief, based in part upon discussions with its financial
advisors, that, absent significant disruptions in the capital markets,
ONEOK would be able to finance the Merger; and
- the Board's belief that there would be few regulatory impediments to the
Merger because of:
(1) ONEOK's stronger financial condition;
(2) the fact that ONEOK was not required to obtain regulatory approvals
from its public utility regulators in Kansas or Oklahoma;
(3) the fact that ONEOK does not currently operate, nor has it in the
past operated, in Arizona, California or Nevada;
(4) the fact that ONEOK is not in a holding company structure; and
(5) the fact that ONEOK represented that, at the time of the consummation
of the Merger, its unsecured debt would be rated at least BBB- by
Standard & Poor's Ratings Group and Baa3 by Moody's Investor
Services, Inc.
The Board in making its determination to reject the Southern Union offer
considered the following factors, which constitute all of the material factors
considered by the Board:
- the Board's belief that the offer from Southern Union was not a better
offer because Southern Union would face a more protracted and difficult
time in obtaining regulatory approvals with achievable and acceptable
conditions due to Southern Union's:
(1) highly leveraged capital structure; 63% debt, including trust
originated preferred securities, to total capitalization for Southern
Union at March 31, 1999 compared to 37% of debt to total
capitalization for ONEOK at February 28, 1999;
(2) smaller capital base; Southern Union's common stockholders' equity at
March 31, 1999 was $313 million; ONEOK's shareholders' equity at
February 28, 1999 was $1.2 billion;
(3) lower credit ratings; on the date of this proxy statement Southern
Union's unsecured debt was rated BBB+ by Standard & Poor's Ratings
Group and Baa3 by Moody's Investor Services, Inc. (which is the lowest
investment grade rating); ONEOK's unsecured debt was rated A by
Standard & Poor's Ratings Group and A2 by Moody's Investor Services,
Inc.;
(4) history of operational and regulatory problems in Missouri, including
actions taken by the Missouri Commission with respect to customer
service and safety issues which have been attributed in the media, in
part, to excessive cost
47
<PAGE> 58
cutting by Southern Union and the high level of debt incurred by
Southern Union in connection with the acquisition of its Missouri
properties;
(5) franchise fee litigation in Texas, which could adversely affect the
ability of the Company to obtain consents from local governmental
entities to the transfer of certain franchises in the Company's
service territory; and
(6) the need to obtain regulatory approvals from the Missouri Commission;
- the Board's belief that the increased price offered by Southern Union did
not adequately compensate the Company's shareholders for the
substantially increased risk that the transaction proposed by Southern
Union would not be consummated due to the additional time, regulatory,
operational and market risks associated with the Southern Union offer;
- the Board's belief that the terms of the agreement proposed by Southern
Union were unacceptable from a financial and regulatory perspective and
were not in the best interests of the Company's shareholders;
- the Board's belief that there were more uncertainties regarding the
ability of Southern Union to finance the proposed transaction in a manner
that would be acceptable to the Commissions and the Missouri Commission
in light of Southern Union's more leveraged capitalization, smaller
equity capital base, lower credit ratings, greater uncertainties in the
equity markets and the longer period of time anticipated between
execution of an agreement with Southern Union and consummation of a
transaction; and
- the Board's questioning of Southern Union's credibility based upon
Southern Union's actions and statements, including Southern Union's
unwillingness to honor the terms of the confidentiality agreement between
the Company and Southern Union and differences between Southern Union's
representations to the Board at the April 6, 1999 Board meeting and the
terms of the Southern Union Agreement proposed by Southern Union; for
further information on litigation arising out of the confidentiality
agreement between the Company and Southern Union, see "Litigation
Affecting the Merger").
The Board also considered the impact of the proposed Merger on the
Company's employees and the communities in which the Company operates, factors
also likely to be considered by the ACC, CPUC and PUCN. In particular, the Board
considered:
- the benefits to be received by the Company's customers from a larger and
financially stronger company after the Merger;
- the fact that ONEOK does not currently operate in Arizona, California and
Nevada and therefore would be less likely to lay-off Company employees;
- ONEOK's covenants regarding employee benefits (see "Summary of the Merger
Agreement -- Employment Benefit Plans");
- ONEOK's covenant to establish an advisory board to advise ONEOK after the
Merger regarding issues of importance to the communities in which the
Company currently has operations, the employees of ONEOK in Arizona,
California and Nevada and the Commissions and FERC (see "Summary of the
Merger Agreement -- Covenants of ONEOK -- ONEOK Boards") and
48
<PAGE> 59
- ONEOK's agreement to locate the headquarters of its Southwest Division,
consisting of Arizona, California and Nevada, in Las Vegas after the
Merger (see "Summary of the Merger Agreement -- Covenants of ONEOK -- Las
Vegas Office)".
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the
Board is not intended to be exhaustive, but constitutes all the material factors
considered by the Board. In reaching its determination to approve and recommend
the principal terms of the Merger, the Board did not assign relative or specific
weights to the foregoing factors and individual directors may have weighed such
factors differently.
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR
On December 14, 1998, Merrill Lynch delivered its written opinion to the
Company's Board of Directors to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon
the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of review set forth in such
opinions, the merger consideration of $28.50 per share to be received by the
holders of Common Stock in the Merger was fair from a financial point of view to
such holders. Merrill Lynch subsequently confirmed its opinion in a written
opinion to the Company's Board of Directors dated as of the date of this proxy
statement to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon the assumptions
made, matters considered and limits of review set forth in such opinion, the
merger consideration of $30.00 per share to be received by the holders of Common
Stock in the Merger was fair from a financial point of view. References herein
to the "Merrill Lynch Opinion" refer to the written opinion of Merrill Lynch
dated as of the date of this proxy statement.
A COPY OF THE MERRILL LYNCH OPINION, WHICH SETS FORTH THE ASSUMPTIONS MADE,
MATTERS CONSIDERED AND CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON THE SCOPE OF REVIEW UNDERTAKEN BY
MERRILL LYNCH, IS ATTACHED AS APPENDIX B TO THIS PROXY STATEMENT. EACH HOLDER OF
COMMON STOCK IS URGED TO READ SUCH OPINION IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE MERRILL LYNCH
OPINION WAS INTENDED FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF
DIRECTORS, WAS DIRECTED ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW OF
THE MERGER CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK, DID NOT
ADDRESS THE MERITS OF THE UNDERLYING DECISION BY THE COMPANY TO ENGAGE IN THE
MERGER AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY SHAREHOLDER AS TO HOW
SUCH SHAREHOLDER SHOULD VOTE ON THE MERGER OR ANY MATTER RELATED THERETO. THE
MERGER CONSIDERATION WAS DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE
COMPANY AND ONEOK AND WAS APPROVED BY THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE
SUMMARY OF THE MERRILL LYNCH OPINION SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT OF THE MERRILL LYNCH
OPINION, WHICH IS ATTACHED AS APPENDIX B HERETO.
In arriving at the Merrill Lynch Opinion, Merrill Lynch, among other
things:
- reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information
relating to the Company that Merrill Lynch deemed to be relevant;
- reviewed certain information, including financial forecasts, relating to
the business, earnings, cash flow, assets, liabilities and prospects of
the Company furnished to Merrill Lynch by the Company;
- conducted discussions with members of senior management and
representatives of the Company concerning the matters described above;
49
<PAGE> 60
- reviewed the market prices and valuation multiples for the Common Stock
and compared them with those of certain publicly traded companies that
Merrill Lynch deemed to be relevant;
- reviewed the results of operations of the Company and compared them with
those of certain publicly traded companies that Merrill Lynch deemed to
be relevant;
- compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger with the financial
terms of certain other transactions that Merrill Lynch deemed to be
relevant;
- participated in certain discussions and negotiations among
representatives of the Company and ONEOK and their financial and legal
advisors;
- reviewed the Merger Agreement; and
- reviewed such other financial studies and analyses and took into account
such other matters as Merrill Lynch deemed necessary, including Merrill
Lynch's assessment of general economic, market and monetary conditions.
In preparing the Merrill Lynch Opinion, Merrill Lynch assumed and relied on
the accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or otherwise made
available to Merrill Lynch, discussed with or reviewed by or for Merrill Lynch,
or publicly available. Merrill Lynch did not assume any responsibility for
independently verifying such information or for undertaking an independent
evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of the Company and
was not furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. In addition, Merrill
Lynch did not assume any obligation to conduct any physical inspection of the
properties or facilities of the Company. With respect to the financial forecast
information furnished to or discussed with Merrill Lynch by the Company, Merrill
Lynch assumed that they were reasonably prepared and reflected the best
currently available estimates and judgment of the Company's management as to the
expected future financial performance of the Company.
The Merrill Lynch Opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic and
other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on, and on the
information made available to Merrill Lynch, as of the date of the Merrill Lynch
Opinion.
In connection with the preparation of the Merrill Lynch opinions, Merrill
Lynch was not authorized by the Company or the Company's Board of Directors to
solicit, nor did Merrill Lynch solicit, third-party indications of interest for
the acquisition of all or any part of the Company.
The following is a summary of certain financial and comparative analyses
performed by Merrill Lynch in connection with the Merrill Lynch opinion
delivered to the Company's Board of Directors on December 14, 1998.
Stock Price Study. Merrill Lynch compared the merger consideration of
$28.50 per share to the closing prices of the Common Stock on September 15, 1998
(the approximate date Merger discussions between the Company and ONEOK moved
beyond the exploratory stage) and December 4, 1998. This analysis showed that
the merger consideration of $28.50 per share represented an implied 46.2%
premium over the closing price of the Common Stock on September 15, 1998 and an
implied 16.0% premium over the closing price of the Common Stock on December 4,
1998. Merrill Lynch also reviewed the per share closing prices of the Common
Stock for the 52-week period ended December 4, 1998. This review indicated that
for this 52-week period the per share closing
50
<PAGE> 61
price of the Common Stock ranged between $17.13 and $25.00, compared to the
original merger consideration of $28.50. Merrill Lynch also reviewed the closing
prices of the Common Stock for the one-year and three-year periods ended
December 4, 1998 and for the period from September 15, 1998 to December 4, 1998,
and compared such movements to the movement during the same periods of the
Comparable Companies. The "Comparable Companies" were AGL Resources, Inc.,
Indiana Energy, Inc., Northwest Natural Gas Company, Piedmont Natural Gas
Company, Inc., and Public Service Company of North Carolina, Incorporated.
Publicly Traded Comparable Company Analysis. Using publicly available
information, Merrill Lynch compared certain financial and operating information
and ratios (described below) for the Company with the corresponding financial
and operating information and ratios for the Comparable Companies.
Merrill Lynch derived an estimated valuation range for the Company by
comparing as of December 4, 1998:
- current trading value as a multiple of projected 1999 earnings per share
("EPS") for the Comparable Companies, which estimates were obtained from
Institutional Brokers Estimate System (as of December 4, 1998), and
ranged from 14.6x to 16.9x, with a mean of 15.7x (as compared to the
Company at 20.6x);
- current trading value as a multiple of book value for the Comparable
Companies, which ranged from 1.63x to 2.24x, with a mean of 2.03x (as
compared to the Company at 1.64x); and
- the "firm value" (defined as the market value of the Common Stock plus
short-and long-term debt and preferred stock minus cash and temporary
investments) as a multiple of estimated 1998 earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), which for Comparable
Transactions ranged from 7.9x to 8.6x, with a mean of 8.3x (as compared
to the Company at 7.3x).
These analyses resulted in an estimated implied equity value per share of
Common Stock that ranged from $22.00 to $26.50 (using the 1999 EPS method and a
relevant range of multiples of 14.5x to 16.5x; the book value method and a
relevant range of multiples of 1.9x to 2.2x; the 1999 EBITDA method and a
relevant range of multiples of 7.5x to 8.5x; and based on approximately 31.2
million shares outstanding, plus net debt and preferred stock valued at $933
million, estimated as of December 30, 1998). Because the Company's financial
results for 1998 reflected greater cash flow, net income and EPS resulting from
anomalous cold-weather conditions in the geographic areas served by the Company,
for the Publicly Traded Comparable Company Analysis and the Comparable
Transaction Analysis summarized below, Merrill Lynch applied the trailing
multiples from the Comparable Companies and the Comparable Transactions on a
forward basis to the Company's projected 1999 financial results (which did not
assume that the cold-weather conditions would continue), rather than to the
Company's 1998 financial results.
Comparable Transaction Analysis. Merrill Lynch reviewed certain publicly
available information regarding six selected business combinations in the
natural gas distribution industry announced since July 1993 (collectively, the
"Comparable Transactions") that
51
<PAGE> 62
Merrill Lynch deemed relevant in evaluating the Merger. The Comparable
Transactions and the dates these transactions were announced are as follows:
- Carolina Power & Light Company's acquisition of North Carolina Natural
Gas Corporation (November 1998);
- Eastern Enterprises' acquisition of Colonial Gas Company (October 1998);
- NIPSCO Industries, Inc.'s acquisition of Bay State Gas Company (December
1997);
- ONEOK, Inc.'s acquisition of Western Resources, Inc.'s LDC gas
distribution and marketing assets (December 1997);
- Atmos Energy Corporation's acquisition of United Cities Gas Company (July
1996); and
- Southern Union Company's acquisition of Western Resources, Inc.'s
Missouri natural gas distribution operations (July 1993).
Merrill Lynch compared the "offer value" (generally defined as the per
share offer price for the acquired company multiplied by the sum of the number
of acquired company shares outstanding and the number of acquired company
options outstanding (net of option proceeds)) of the Comparable Transactions as
a multiple of (1) the next four quarters' estimated EPS of the acquired company
prior to the date of announcement ("Forward EPS") (which analysis excluded
ONEOK, Inc.'s acquisition of Western Resources, Inc.'s LDC gas distribution and
marketing assets and Southern Union Company's acquisition of Western Resources,
Inc.'s Missouri natural gas distribution operations) and (2) the book value of
the acquired company at the date of announcement (which analysis excluded ONEOK,
Inc.'s acquisition of Western Resources, Inc.'s LDC gas distribution and
marketing assets). For the Comparable Transactions, Merrill Lynch also compared
the "transaction value" (defined as the offer value plus an assumed value of net
debt and preferred stock and including option proceeds) as a multiple of the
latest twelve months ("LTM") EBITDA of the acquired company. The results of
these analyses were as follows: (1) the multiples of offer value to Forward EPS
ranged from 17.8x to 20.2x, with a mean of 18.9x; (2) the multiples of offer
value to book value ranged from 1.3x to 2.8x, with a mean of 2.2x; and (3) the
multiples of transaction value to LTM EBITDA ranged from 7.7x to 11.7x, with a
mean of 9.8x.
These analyses resulted in an estimated implied equity value per share of
Common Stock that ranged from $25.00 to $32.50 (using a relevant range of
multiples of offer value to estimated 1999 EPS of 18.0x to 21.0x; a relevant
range of multiples of offer value to book value of 2.0x to 2.3x; a relevant
range of multiples of transaction value to estimated 1999 EBITDA of 8.0x to
10.0x; and based on approximately 31.2 million shares outstanding, plus net debt
and preferred stock valued at $933 million, as of December 30, 1998).
Merrill Lynch also analyzed the estimated per share range of values of the
Common Stock based on a range of valuation multiples estimated by Merrill Lynch
Equity Research. The four valuation multiples used for the Company were: (1)
1999 estimated price to earnings, (2) current trading value to current book
value, (3) implied acquisition premium to current trading value of the Common
Stock and (4) 1999 cash flow from operations estimate.
52
<PAGE> 63
These analyses resulted in an estimated implied equity value per share of
Common Stock that ranged from $23.11 (using a price to estimated 1999 earnings
ratio) to $36.00 (using a price to book value ratio).
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Merrill Lynch derived an estimated per share
equity valuation range for the Company by performing a discounted cash flow
("DCF") analysis. The DCF was calculated assuming discount rates ranging from 7%
to 8% and was comprised of the sum of the present values of (1) the projected
unlevered free cash flows for the years 1999 to 2007 as estimated by the Company
and (2) the year 2007 terminal value based upon multiples of projected year 2007
EBITDA ranging from 7.0x to 8.0x. This analysis resulted in an estimated implied
equity value per share of Common Stock (net of outstanding debt) that ranged
from $21.25 to $31.50.
In connection with the Merrill Lynch Opinion, Merrill Lynch reviewed the
analyses described above and performed certain procedures to update such
analyses, as appropriate. The results of these analyses were substantially the
same as those of the December 14, 1998 opinion of Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch
did not review with the Board of Directors its updated analyses.
The summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete description
of the analyses performed by Merrill Lynch in arriving at the Merrill Lynch
opinions. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not
necessarily susceptible to partial or summary description. Merrill Lynch
believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of its analyses and the factors considered by it, without considering
all such factors and analyses, could create a misleading view of the process
underlying its analyses set forth in the Merrill Lynch opinions. Merrill Lynch
did not assign relative weights to any of its analyses in preparing the Merrill
Lynch opinions. The matters considered by Merrill Lynch in its analyses were
based on numerous macroeconomic, operating and financial assumptions with
respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond the Company's and Merrill Lynch's
control and involve the application of complex methodologies and educated
judgment. Any estimates contained in Merrill Lynch's analyses are not
necessarily indicative of actual past or future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than such estimates. Estimated values do
not purport to be appraisals and do not necessarily reflect the prices at which
businesses or companies may be sold in the future, and such estimates are
inherently subject to uncertainty.
No Comparable Company utilized as a comparison in the analyses described
above is identical to the Company, and none of the Comparable Transactions
utilized as a comparison is identical to the proposed Merger. In addition,
various analyses performed by Merrill Lynch incorporate projections prepared by
research analysts using only publicly available information. Such estimates may
or may not prove to be accurate. An analysis of publicly traded comparable
companies and comparable business combinations is not mathematical; rather it
involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in
financial and operating characteristics of the comparable companies and other
factors that could affect the public trading value of the comparable companies
or company to which they are being compared.
The Company's Board of Directors selected Merrill Lynch to act as its
financial advisor because of Merrill Lynch's reputation as an internationally
recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in transactions
similar to the Merger and because
53
<PAGE> 64
it is familiar with the Company and its business. As part of its investment
banking business, Merrill Lynch is continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed
and unlisted securities and private placements.
Pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement between the Company and Merrill
Lynch dated October 5, 1998, the Company has agreed to pay Merrill Lynch (1) a
fee of $1 million upon the execution of the merger agreement, (2) an additional
fee of $1 million payable upon the approval of the Merger Agreement by the
Company's shareholders, and (3) upon consummation of the Merger, a fee of
approximately $4 million, against which any fees previously paid to Merrill
Lynch pursuant to clauses (1) and (2) above will be credited. The Company has
also agreed to reimburse Merrill Lynch for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
(including the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel) and to
indemnify Merrill Lynch and certain related parties from and against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws arising out
of its engagement.
Merrill Lynch has, in the past, provided financial advisory and financing
services to the Company, including acting as lead underwriter in connection with
an offering of the Common Stock in July 1998, and may continue to do so, and has
received, and may continue to receive, fees for the rendering of such services.
In addition, in the ordinary course of Merrill Lynch's business, Merrill Lynch
may actively trade the Common Stock and other securities of the Company, as well
as securities of ONEOK, for its own account and for the accounts of its
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
INTERESTS OF OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
Summary of Benefits. The outside directors of the Company own shares of the
Company and hold options to acquire Common Stock under the terms of the Option
Plan. To that extent, their interest in the Merger is the same as yours. For
information on the number of shares of Common Stock and options held by each
director, see "Election of Directors -- Securities Ownership of Nominees,
Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders" and "Section 16
Information -- Section 16(b)."
Under the change in control provisions of the Option Plan, if the Merger is
consummated, each director is entitled to receive an amount equal to the
difference between the option exercise price and the Merger Consideration of
$30.00 per share, which is $85,125 for each of the directors, other than
directors Kropid and Wright, and $32,178 for directors Kropid and Wright. In
addition, under the terms of the Option Plan each of the directors has the right
to receive an option to acquire an additional 2,000 shares of Common Stock on
the date of the Annual Meeting. The exercise price of the Common Stock will be
the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date
of the Annual Meeting. This option grant will be void if the Merger occurs prior
to February 10, 2000. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Merger must
be completed within three business days after all conditions to the Merger have
been satisfied. The Company anticipates that the Merger will be completed prior
to February 10, 2000.
54
<PAGE> 65
Outside directors may defer their compensation, including cash received
through the cancellation of outstanding options as a result of the Merger, for a
period of up to five years. Amounts deferred will be paid out over 5, 10, 15 or
20 years, with interest at 150% of the Moody's Composite Bond Rate. In addition,
each of the directors, other than directors Kropid and Wright who have less than
eight years of service, will be entitled to receive $24,000 annually for life
after completion of the Merger pursuant to the terms of the directors'
retirement plan.
ONEOK Boards. ONEOK has agreed to appoint three of the Company's outside
directors to the board of directors of ONEOK after completion of the Merger.
Outside directors of ONEOK receive an annual retainer of $22,500, a fee of
$1,000 for attending each board and committee meeting and reimbursement of
expenses incurred in attending such meetings. Outside directors of ONEOK who
chair a committee receive an annual retainer of $3,500. In addition, ONEOK has
agreed to establish an advisory board consisting of the outside directors after
completion of the Merger. For further information, see "Summary of the Merger
Agreement -- Covenants of ONEOK -- ONEOK Boards."
INTERESTS OF INSIDE DIRECTORS
Michael Maffie and George Biehl are executive officers as well as directors
of the Company. They have certain interests in the Merger that are different
from your interests as a shareholder. The Board was aware of these interests and
considered them in recommending and approving the Merger. These interests are
summarized below.
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements. Each of Messrs. Maffie and
Biehl, as executive officers of the Company, has an employment agreement with
the Company. The employment agreement provides that, if within 24 months after a
change in control of the Company, the executive officer terminates his
employment for good reason or his employment is terminated by the Company for
any reason other than death, permanent disability, cause or expiration of the
term of the employment agreement, then he will be entitled to severance
benefits. The Merger will constitute a change in control of the Company. "Good
reason" includes a change in duties or title, a reduction in salary, a material
reduction in benefits and an assignment to a new location.
Upon the consummation of the Merger, Mr. Maffie will not be employed by
ONEOK. As a result, he will be entitled to receive the following severance
benefits:
- a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of three years of his
yearly base salary, three year's incentive compensation calculated as 90%
of his base salary, and three year's fringe benefits calculated as 20% of
his base salary;
- a choice of reimbursement for all expenses incurred in connection with
finding new employment and moving or $75,000;
- suitable office space and secretarial services for the earlier of two
years or until he secures other employment; and
- benefits under the Company's executive deferral plan and SERP.
Following the Merger, the duties and title of Mr. Biehl will change. As a
result, he will be entitled to receive the following benefits:
- a lump sum payment equal to the sum of 30 months of his yearly base
salary, 30 months of incentive compensation calculated as 60% of his base
salary, and 30 months fringe benefits calculated as 20% of his base
salary;
- $75,000; and
- benefits under the Company's executive deferral plan and SERP.
55
<PAGE> 66
Mr. Maffie's benefits (excluding benefits under the executive deferral plan
and the Company's retirement plans) are estimated to be approximately
$3,225,000. Mr. Biehl's benefits (excluding benefits under the executive
deferral plan and the Company's retirement plans) are estimated to be
approximately $1,119,000. If any payment under these agreements would constitute
a "parachute payment" subject to excise tax under the Code, the executive
officer will be entitled to an additional "gross-up" payment.
Under the terms of the executive deferral plan, each of the executive
officers may defer up to 100% of the amounts received under the Option Plan, the
MIP and their change in control and severance arrangements. Amounts deferred
bear interest at 150% of the Moody's Seasoned Corporate Bond Rate. At the end of
the deferral period amounts deferred will be paid out over 10, 15 or 20 years,
with interest at 150% of the Moody's Composite Bond Rate.
Messrs. Maffie and Biehl became eligible for benefits under the SERP in
1986 and 1989, respectively. Mr. Maffie's benefits are calculated on the basis
of the highest 12 months of earnings, including base salary, compensation
deferred under the executive deferral plan, and compensation under the MIP for
the year in which it is received. Using the earnings reflected for 1998 in the
Summary Compensation Table, Mr. Maffie's benefits under the Company's retirement
plans, including the SERP, are estimated to be $642,353 per year. Mr. Biehl's
benefits are calculated on the basis of the highest 12 months of earnings,
including base salary and compensation deferred under the executive deferral
plan. Using the earnings reflected for 1998 in the Summary Compensation Table,
Mr. Biehl's benefits under the Company's retirement plans, including the SERP,
are estimated to be $135,047 per year.
Consulting Agreement. ONEOK entered into a consulting agreement with Mr.
Maffie concurrently with execution of the Merger Agreement which will become
effective upon completion of the Merger. The consulting agreement has a term of
five years. Mr. Maffie's duties will include providing support and cooperating
with ONEOK in public matters and regulatory matters, and assisting and advising
ONEOK on the business and affairs of ONEOK. During the term of the consulting
agreement, Mr. Maffie has agreed that he will not engage in the gas distribution
business in the states of Nevada and Arizona without the consent of ONEOK.
The consulting agreement also provides for indemnification of Mr. Maffie
for expenses incurred in connection with any proceeding against him by reason of
the fact that he is or was serving at the request of ONEOK.
ONEOK will pay Mr. Maffie a fee of $3 million, payable in sixty equal
monthly installments for his consulting services and covenant not to compete. If
Mr. Maffie dies during the term of the consulting agreement, the remaining
installments will continue to be paid to his beneficiary. ONEOK will reimburse
Mr. Maffie for certain expenses and will provide him with office space. Such
benefits will be in addition to the benefits provided Mr. Maffie under his
current employment agreement and benefit plans with the Company. To the extent
that any of these payments constitute a "parachute payment" subject to excise
tax under the Code, Mr. Maffie will be entitled to an additional "gross-up"
payment.
Southern Union offered to provide these same benefits to Mr. Maffie.
56
<PAGE> 67
Employment Agreement. ONEOK also entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Biehl concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, which will
become effective upon completion of the Merger. The term of the employment
agreement is for three years, and will be automatically renewed for successive
one year terms unless either party notifies the other to the contrary. Under the
terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Biehl will be employed as Vice President,
Finance and Administration of the Southwest Division of ONEOK, which will
consist of ONEOK's operations in Arizona, California and Nevada.
Under the employment agreement, ONEOK will pay Mr. Biehl an annual salary
of not less than $232,000, payable in equal monthly installments. In addition,
Mr. Biehl will be eligible for incentive compensation under ONEOK's incentive
compensation plans at a level of not less than the average amount received
during the last three years at the Company. Mr. Biehl will also be entitled to
the employee benefit plans of ONEOK, except for the ONEOK Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan. ONEOK will reimburse Mr. Biehl for certain expenses and provide
him with office space. Such benefits will be in addition to the benefits
provided Mr. Biehl under his current employment agreement and benefit plans with
the Company. To the extent any of these payments constitute a "parachute
payment" subject to excise tax under the Code, Mr. Biehl will be entitled to an
additional "gross-up" payment.
If within a certain period of time after a change in control of ONEOK, Mr.
Biehl terminates his employment with ONEOK for good reason, he will be entitled
to a severance payment equal to the sum of three years of his annual base
salary, three years incentive compensation calculated as 60% of his base salary,
and three years fringe benefits calculated as 20% of his base salary. "Good
reason" includes a change in duties, a reduction in salary, a material reduction
in benefits or an assignment to a new location. He will also be entitled to the
choice of reimbursement for all expenses, not to exceed $100,000, incurred for
finding new employment and moving, or $100,000. Any restricted stock awards,
stock options or stock appreciation rights will automatically vest.
Mr. Biehl's employment with ONEOK will terminate upon his death or
permanent disability. ONEOK may terminate the employment agreement for cause, in
which case Mr. Biehl's salary and benefits under the agreement will immediately
cease. If Mr. Biehl terminates his employment agreement for "good reason" or
ONEOK terminates his employment for any reason other than death, permanent
disability, cause or expiration of the term of the agreement, any restricted
stock awards, stock options or stock appreciation rights will automatically
become vested and his compensation under the employment agreement will continue
to be paid for the balance of the term of the employment agreement.
The employment agreement also provides for indemnification of Mr. Biehl to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
Southern Union offered to provide these same benefits to Mr. Biehl.
INTERESTS OF OTHER OFFICERS
Certain officers of the Company have entered into agreements with the
Company which provide certain benefits in the event of a change in control of
the Company. In addition, certain officers of the Company entered into
agreements with ONEOK
57
<PAGE> 68
concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement. The terms of these
agreements are summarized below.
Change in Control Arrangements. Each of the executive officers is entitled
to additional benefits in the event of a change in control of the Company if his
employment is terminated for "good reason". These benefits include:
- a lump sum payment equal to the sum of 2 or 2 1/2 years of such officer's
yearly base salary, 2 or 2 1/2 years of incentive compensation calculated
as 40% or 60% of such base salary, and 2 or 2 1/2 years of fringe
benefits calculated as 20% of such base salary; and
- benefits under the Company's executive deferral plan and SERP.
In addition, certain officers will also be entitled to receive:
- a choice of reimbursement for all expenses incurred in connection with
finding new employment and moving or $75,000; and
- office space and secretarial services for the earlier of two years or
until such officer secures other employment.
The aggregate of these benefits (excluding benefits under the executive
deferral plan and the Company's retirement plans) for Messrs. Zub, Sondeno and
Lowman and for the other executive officers, as a group, if their employment
with ONEOK is terminated for "good reason" is $930,000, $694,200, $701,400 and
$2,161,700, respectively.
Certain other officers of the Company are entitled to additional benefits
in the event of a change in control of the Company if their employment with
ONEOK is terminated for "good reason". If this event were to occur as to all
these officers, these officers would be entitled to receive $3,837,000 in the
aggregate.
Assumption Agreements. ONEOK also entered into assumption agreements with
Messrs. Zub and Lowman and two other executive officers. Pursuant to the
assumption agreements, at the time the Merger is consummated, ONEOK will assume
the obligations of the Company under the employment/change in control agreements
that currently exist with each of these employees. In addition, each of these
employees will be entitled to benefits under the SERP as if they had at least 20
years of continuous service and had attained the age of 60.
Southern Union offered to provide these same benefits to these executive
officers.
Summary of Benefits. The executive officers of the Company own Common
Stock, hold options to acquire Common Stock under the terms of the Option Plan,
have the right to acquire Common Stock under the MIP and have interests in
Common Stock under the Company's 401(k) plan. To that extent, their interest in
the Merger is the same as yours. For additional information on the Company's
employee benefit plans, see "Executive Compensation and Benefits-Benefit Plans."
For information regarding ONEOK's obligation to pay benefits to Company
employees, see "Summary of the Merger Agreement -- Employee Benefit Plans." For
information regarding the number of shares of Common Stock or interests therein
of the executive officers of the Company, see "Election of
Directors -- Securities Ownership of Nominees, Executive Officers and Principal
Shareholders" and "Section 16 Information -- Section 16(b)."
58
<PAGE> 69
Under the terms of the Company's executive deferral plan, each of these
officers will be entitled to defer amounts received under the Option Plan, MIP
and change in control payments on the same basis as the inside directors.
Each of the officers of the Company participate in the SERP. Except as
otherwise described above, these officers will continue to accrue benefits after
the Merger on terms which are no less favorable than the terms of the SERP on
the date the Merger Agreement was executed, taking into account service and
compensation while employed by ONEOK after the Merger.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, from and after the date on which the
Merger is completed (the "Closing Date"), ONEOK has agreed to indemnify, defend
and hold harmless each of the present and former officers and directors of the
Company from acts or omissions occurring prior to the Closing Date or arising
out of any of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. ONEOK has
also agreed to provide officers' and directors' liability insurance in respect
of acts or omissions occurring prior to the Closing Date for a period of at
least six years after the Closing Date. See "Summary of the Merger
Agreement -- Covenants of ONEOK -- Indemnification and Insurance of the
Company's Directors and Officers."
LITIGATION AFFECTING THE MERGER
On December 16, 1998, Arthur Klein filed a purported class action complaint
on behalf of himself and all shareholders of the Company (excluding defendants
and their affiliates and families) in the Superior Court of the State of
California in San Diego County (Case No. 726615) against the Company and its
directors. The original complaint alleges one cause of action for breach of
fiduciary duty. Plaintiff alleged that the consideration for the proposed Merger
with ONEOK was unfair and inadequate because the Company's Board of Directors
approved the Merger Agreement with ONEOK without conducting an auction or using
another "market check" mechanism. On March 22, 1999, plaintiff amended his
complaint to allege causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, duty of
loyalty and due care and breach of duty of candor. Plaintiff filed a second
amended complaint on May 5, 1999 alleging causes of action for breach of the
duties of loyalty, due care, candor and good faith and fair dealing. The
shareholder plaintiffs' second amended complaint seeks
- to enjoin the Merger with ONEOK;
- to rescind the Merger Agreement with ONEOK, or portions thereof;
- to implement an auction of the Company or similar process;
- to void the $30 million termination fee in the Merger Agreement with
ONEOK;
- unspecified damages; and
- a declaration that the action is properly maintainable as a class action
on behalf of all shareholders.
On March 31, 1999, the Court allowed John Mauricio to file a complaint in
intervention, which is substantially identical to Arthur Klein's second amended
complaint.
59
<PAGE> 70
On May 4, 1999, Southern Union intervened in the purported shareholder class
action and filed a complaint in intervention against the Company seeking a
declaration from the Court that it is entitled to solicit directly the Company's
shareholders to oppose the Merger with ONEOK and to seek approval of a proposed
merger with Southern Union, rescinding portions of the confidentiality and
standstill agreement between Southern Union and the Company dated February 21,
1999 and a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to prevent
the Company from conducting a proxy solicitation in support of the Merger during
the course of the litigation. In addition, Southern Union is seeking
compensatory and punitive damages.
The Company removed the combined shareholder and Southern Union lawsuit
from the California Superior Court in San Diego to the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of California. The Company has filed motions to dismiss
Southern Union's complaint in intervention and alternatively to transfer
Southern Union's complaint in intervention to the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Oklahoma. Southern Union is opposing these motions and is
seeking to have the lawsuit remanded to the San Diego Superior Court. The U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of California has scheduled a hearing
on the remand motion for August 2, 1999. The Company's motions to dismiss and to
transfer are scheduled to be heard on September 7, 1999 and August 23, 1999,
respectively.
On June 9, 1999, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU")
with the shareholder plaintiffs' counsel to settle this action as to all
plaintiffs, except Southern Union. The MOU sets forth the parties' agreement in
principle settling all of the shareholders' claims arising out of the actions of
the Company and its directors relating to the Merger, including any allegations
of misrepresentations or omissions in this proxy statement, and will be
incorporated into a final Stipulation of Settlement. The MOU is not an admission
of any of the plaintiffs' allegations. The Company and its directors have denied
and continue to deny that they have committed or attempted to commit any
wrongdoing or breached any duty owed to the Company or its shareholders. The MOU
is subject to several conditions, including the consummation of the Merger and
the entry of a final judgment of dismissal with prejudice by the U.S. District
Court that is binding on all shareholders from December 14, 1998, through the
date that the shareholders approve the Merger.
On June 25, 1999, the shareholders filed a third amended complaint setting
forth the shareholders' claims relating to this proxy statement which were
resolved as described in the preceding paragraph.
On April 30, 1999, the Company filed a complaint against Southern Union in
the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada (Case No. CV-99-0530-JBF-LRL)
alleging breach of the confidentiality and standstill agreement between the
Company and Southern Union, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and
fair dealing, misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with
contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and other
violations of California and Nevada law. The Company amended its complaint on
May 6, 1999, adding an additional claim against Southern Union pursuant to
Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act. The Company has filed a motion to transfer
this case to the Northern District of Oklahoma. Southern Union has filed an
answer in the Nevada action and has opposed the Company's motion to transfer.
The District Court of Nevada has not ruled on the Company's motion.
On May 5, 1999, ONEOK filed a complaint against Southern Union for
breaching the February 21, 1999 confidentiality and standstill agreement in the
United States District
60
<PAGE> 71
Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Case No. 99-CV-345H(M)). ONEOK's
third party beneficiary claims against Southern Union in the Oklahoma action are
similar to those asserted by the Company against Southern Union in the Nevada
action. ONEOK also sought to enjoin Southern Union from breaching the February
21, 1999 confidentiality and standstill agreement and from taking any other
wrongful actions to disrupt the proposed merger with the Company.
On May 11, 1999, the Northern District of Oklahoma granted ONEOK's
requested injunction and issued a temporary restraining order enjoining Southern
Union from any future violation of the February 21, 1999 confidentiality and
standstill agreement, including soliciting proxies from the Company's
shareholders. ONEOK and Southern Union then stipulated that the temporary
restraining order could be entered as a preliminary injunction and that Southern
Union would be deemed to have sought and been denied a stay of the injunction.
The Northern District of Oklahoma entered the parties' stipulation and Southern
Union filed a Notice of Appeal and Request for a Stay of the injunction with the
Tenth Circuit on May 17, 1999. The Tenth Circuit received Southern Union's
filing on May 18, 1999 and has issued an order staying the injunction for the
sole purpose of permitting Southern Union the opportunity to oppose the
Company's motion to transfer the related California lawsuit to the Northern
District of Oklahoma and to file a motion to remand the California lawsuit to
the San Diego Superior Court. Southern Union subsequently filed supplements to
its motion for stay seeking the opportunity to participate in ongoing
administrative proceedings before state public utility commissions, including
proceedings in Arizona, California and Nevada. On June 10, 1999, the Tenth
Circuit Court of Appeals denied Southern Union's request for a stay of the
District Court's injunction insofar as it pertains to state public utility
commission proceedings. On June 9, 1999, Southern Union filed a motion with the
Northern District of Oklahoma to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds of lack of
personal jurisdiction and improper venue and a motion to transfer the Oklahoma
action to the District of Nevada, or alternatively to stay the Oklahoma action
pending the final disposition of the Nevada action brought by the Company
against Southern Union. The Northern District of Oklahoma has yet to rule on
either of these motions.
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
If you hold Common Stock and you do not wish to accept the Merger
Consideration, then Chapter 13 (Sections 1300 through 1312) of the California
General Corporation Law ("Chapter 13") provides that you may elect to have the
"fair market value" of your shares (exclusive of any appreciation or
depreciation in connection with the proposed Merger) determined as of the day
before the first announcement of the terms of the proposed Merger if dissenters'
rights are available. Dissenters' rights will be available if demands for
payment are properly filed with the Company with respect to 5% or more of the
Company's outstanding shares on or prior to the date of the Annual Meeting. The
closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 11,
1998, the last trading day prior to the first announcement of the proposed
Merger, was $24.37 per share.
Chapter 13 is set forth in its entirety in Appendix C to this proxy
statement. If you wish to exercise your dissenters' rights or to preserve the
right to do so, you should carefully review Appendix C. If dissenters' rights
are available and you fail to comply with the procedures specified in Chapter 13
in a timely manner you may lose your dissenters'
61
<PAGE> 72
rights. Because of the complexity of these procedures, you should seek the
advice of counsel if you are considering exercising your dissenters' rights.
If you wish to exercise your dissenter's rights under Chapter 13, you must
satisfy each of the following conditions:
- You must vote against the Merger.
- You must deliver to the Company a written demand for appraisal of your
Common Stock not later than the date of the Annual Meeting. This written
demand is in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote against the
principal terms of the Merger. Merely voting against the approval of the
principal terms of the Merger will not constitute a demand for appraisal
within the meaning of Chapter 13.
- If it is determined that dissenters' rights are available, you must
deliver your shares for endorsement within 30 days after the date on
which notice of shareholder approval of the principal terms of the Merger
is mailed to you by the Company. The notice will contain a statement of
the price which the Company has determined to be the fair market value of
the Common Stock on the date prior to the first announcement of the
Merger.
- If you disagree with us as to the calculation of "fair market value," you
must file a petition in the Superior Court of the appropriate county
demanding a determination of the fair market value of your Common Stock.
This petition must be filed by either you or the Company within six
months of the notice described above.
Demands for appraisal must be made in writing and must be mailed or
delivered to: Investor Relations, Southwest Gas Corporation, 5241 Spring
Mountain Road, P. O. Box 98510, Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-8510. You will continue
to be a shareholder of the Company until the fair market value of your Common
Stock is determined or you lose your dissenters' rights.
If dissenters' rights are available and you properly demand appraisal of
your Common Stock under Chapter 13 but you fail to perfect or withdraw your
right to appraisal, your Common Stock will be converted into the Merger
Consideration. You may not, however, withdraw a demand for appraisal unless the
Company gives its consent.
If the Merger Agreement is terminated, you will lose your right to require
the Company to purchase your Common Stock. It is a condition to the obligations
of the Company and ONEOK to consummate the Merger that demands for dissenters'
rights not be made by 5% or more of the Common Stock. Unless this condition is
waived by both parties, the Merger will not be consummated if dissenters' rights
are available.
If the dissenters' rights condition is waived by both parties, you will be
entitled to receive the fair market value of your Common Stock on the date prior
to the first announcement of the Merger, plus interest at the legal rate on
judgments from the date on which the fair market value of the Common Stock has
been determined. If a suit is filed to determine the fair market value of the
Common Stock, the costs of the action will be assessed or apportioned as the
court concludes is equitable, provided that the Company must pay all such costs
if the value awarded by the court is 125% of the price offered by the Company.
Cash dividends paid by the Company after the date of approval of the principal
terms of the Merger Agreement by the Company's shareholders will be credited
against the total amount owed. If the amount payable exceeds the amount of
dividends that the Company would be permitted to pay under California law, the
holders of
62
<PAGE> 73
dissenters' rights will become creditors of the Company for any amount unpaid.
Interest will continue to accrue on the unpaid amount at the legal rate on
judgments until paid.
IF YOU ARE CONSIDERING EXERCISING YOUR DISSENTERS' RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD BE
AWARE THAT THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF YOUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AS DETERMINED
UNDER CHAPTER 13 COULD BE GREATER THAN, THE SAME AS, OR LESS THAN THE MERGER
CONSIDERATION. THE OPINION DELIVERED BY MERRILL LYNCH IS NOT AN OPINION AS TO
FAIR MARKET VALUE UNDER CHAPTER 13.
The foregoing is a summary of the provisions of Chapter 13 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of California and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of Chapter 13, which is included as Appendix C.
SUMMARY OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
This section of the proxy statement describes some aspects of the proposed
Merger, including some of the provisions of the Merger Agreement. The
description of the Merger Agreement contained in this proxy statement is not
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement,
a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. YOU ARE URGED
TO READ THE ENTIRE MERGER AGREEMENT CAREFULLY.
STRUCTURE; EFFECTIVE TIME
The Merger Agreement provides for the Merger of Merger Sub into the
Company. The Company will survive the Merger. Immediately after the Merger, the
Company will merge into ONEOK. ONEOK will survive the second merger. It is a
condition to the consummation of the Merger that all conditions to consummation
of the second merger, other than consummation of the Merger, have been
satisfied.
The Merger will become effective at the time the Merger Agreement is filed
with the Secretary of State of the State of California. The Merger is expected
to occur during the fourth quarter of 1999 assuming that all conditions to the
Merger have been satisfied or, to the extent permitted by applicable law,
waived.
MERGER CONSIDERATION
Upon consummation of the Merger, each of your shares of Common Stock and
each associated stock purchase right issued pursuant to the Company's
shareholder rights plan, will be automatically converted into the right to
receive the Merger Consideration upon the surrender of your Common Stock
certificates. If dissenters' rights are available and have been properly
perfected, then those shares will be treated as provided under "Dissenters'
Rights."
ONEOK will appoint a paying agent who will make payment of the Merger
Consideration in exchange for certificates representing shares of Common Stock.
ONEOK will make cash available to the paying agent in order to permit the paying
agent to pay the Merger Consideration. The paying agent will send you a letter
of transmittal and instructions explaining how to send your certificates to the
paying agent. If you send your stock certificates to the paying agent, together
with a properly completed letter of transmittal, then promptly after the paying
agent receives and processes your documents, a
63
<PAGE> 74
check for the Merger Consideration will be mailed to you (subject to any
withholding tax required by law).
If you fail to surrender your stock certificates within one year after the
Closing Date, you may no longer obtain the Merger Consideration from the paying
agent, but, subject to applicable abandonment, escheat or similar laws, must
look solely to ONEOK for payment.
The aggregate Merger Consideration is estimated to be approximately $920
million. Additional amounts will be payable by ONEOK to officers and directors
of the Company. For further information, see "Interests of Certain Persons in
the Merger."
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Employee and Director Stock Options. The Company is required to adjust each
director and employee stock option outstanding at the time of the Merger so that
the holder of each option, whether vested or unvested, will be entitled to a
cash payment from the Company. The cash payment for each option will equal the
amount of the Merger Consideration less the exercise price of the option.
For information regarding the amounts which may be received by the
directors and officers of the Company pursuant to employee and director stock
options, see "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger."
Management Incentive Plan. The MIP will terminate at the time of the
Merger, and each employee of the Company who participates in the MIP at that
time will receive:
- a pro-rated portion of the current year's award based on the Company's
performance up to the date the Merger is completed; and
- any amounts which, as of the date the Merger is completed, have been
earned under the MIP but which have not been paid for years prior to the
current year in a cash amount equal to $30.00 multiplied by the number of
outstanding performance shares which have been awarded under the MIP to
that participant.
For additional information on the MIP, see "Executive Compensation and
Benefits -- Benefit Plans -- Management Incentive Plan."
Post-Merger Employee Benefits. All of the Company's employee benefit plans,
other than the Incentive Plans, will be assumed by ONEOK in the Merger. Each
participant in the MIP, other than Mr. Maffie, will be entitled to participate
in ONEOK's management incentive plan after the Merger on the same terms and
conditions as other participants in ONEOK's plan.
ONEOK has agreed, with certain limited exceptions, for a period of at least
one year after the Merger, to provide each employee of the Company and its
subsidiaries (other than NPL) with benefits under its qualified benefit plans,
its nonqualified benefit plans (other than the SERP) and its welfare plans that
are no less favorable in the aggregate to the benefits provided by the Company
to such employee under each of these types of plans prior to the Merger.
Thereafter, ONEOK has agreed, with certain limited exceptions, to provide
employees of the Company and its subsidiaries (other than NPL) with benefits
under its qualified employee benefit plans, its nonqualified employee benefit
plans (other than the SERP) and its welfare plans that are no less favorable in
the aggregate to the benefits provided by ONEOK to similarly situated employees
of ONEOK in Oklahoma
64
<PAGE> 75
under each of these types of plans. Each participant in any of the Company's
benefit plans who becomes an employee of ONEOK or its subsidiaries will receive
credit for service with the Company prior to the Merger for purposes of
eligibility to participate, vesting and eligibility to receive benefits, but not
for benefit accrual, under any replacement plan of ONEOK in which such employee
is eligible to participate. The employees of NPL are covered by employee benefit
plans that are separate from those of the Company and its other subsidiaries.
These benefits plans will not be affected by the Merger.
Participants in the SERP will continue to accrue benefits after the Merger
on terms which are no less favorable than the terms of the SERP on the date the
Merger Agreement was executed, taking into account service and compensation
while employed by ONEOK or its subsidiaries after the Merger. For additional
information on the SERP, see "Executive Compensation and Benefits -- Benefit
Plans."
Participants in the Company's 401(k) plan will continue to be permitted to
participate in the plan after the Merger, with the exception that any
participants who have elected to invest in Common Stock will instead be entitled
to invest in ONEOK's common stock.
COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY
Interim Operations of the Company. The Company and its subsidiaries are
required to comply with a number of covenants concerning the operation of their
businesses, corporate structure, governance and financing, and compensation of
management. In general, the Company agreed to continue to operate its business
in the usual, regular and ordinary course in substantially the same manner as
conducted prior to execution of the Merger Agreement, unless it obtains the
prior consent of ONEOK.
The Company is permitted to engage in the following activities without
obtaining the prior written consent of ONEOK:
- pay regular quarterly dividends on its Common Stock with usual record and
payment dates that do not exceed the current rate of $0.205 per share;
- pay regular cumulative cash distributions on Southwest Gas Capital I's
9.125% Trust Originated Preferred Securities;
- issue additional Common Stock under the terms of its current employee
benefit plans, including the issuance of additional Common Stock under
the Company's 401(k) plan and the issuance of stock options to purchase
up to 2,000 shares of Common Stock to each of the Company's outside
directors at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the terms of the
Option Plan;
- issue additional shares of Common Stock under its dividend reinvestment
and stock purchase plan;
- permit NPL to continue to make acquisitions in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $15 million annually;
- make capital expenditures, other than in the ordinary course of business,
in an amount not to exceed $5 million;
- make capital expenditures in the ordinary course of business in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $230 million annually;
65
<PAGE> 76
- incur additional short-term indebtedness in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
- incur additional long-term unsecured indebtedness ranking pari passu in
right of payment with the Company's current long-term unsecured
indebtedness with maturities of five years or less in an aggregate amount
not to exceed $50 million annually;
- incur additional long-term indebtedness in the principal amount of up to
$35 million evidencing the Company's obligations under industrial
development revenue bonds to be issued by Clark County, Nevada;
- permit NPL to engage in equipment financing in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $15 million annually;
- refund existing indebtedness at a lower cost of funds; and
- make rate filings with the Commissions and FERC so long as such rate
filings would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on the Company.
Annual Meeting; Proxy Material. The Company agreed to prepare a preliminary
proxy statement for filing with the SEC on or prior to May 14, 1999, and to hold
the Annual Meeting, and to take all other actions necessary or, in the
reasonable opinion of ONEOK, advisable to secure the approval of the Company's
shareholders. The Board also agreed to recommend shareholder approval of the
principal terms of the Merger Agreement, subject to its fiduciary duties.
No Solicitation by the Company. Subject to exceptions summarized below, the
Company agreed that it will not, and will not authorize or permit any of its
officers, directors or representatives to, directly or indirectly, solicit,
initiate or encourage the submission of any proposals or offers from any person
relating to, or that could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Business
Combination or participate in any negotiations or discussions regarding, or
furnish to any other person any information with respect to, or otherwise
cooperate in any way with, any effort or attempt by any other person to do or
seek a Business Combination. The term "Business Combination" means any of the
following:
- a merger, consolidation or other business combination, share exchange,
sale of shares of capital stock, tender or exchange offer or similar
transaction, involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries;
- the acquisition, either directly or indirectly, of a material interest in
the voting securities of, or a material equity interest in a substantial
portion of the assets of, the Company or any of its subsidiaries
(including any transaction or series of transactions which is structured
to permit a third party to acquire beneficial ownership of a majority or
greater interest in the Company); or
- the acquisition, either directly or indirectly, of a material portion of
the business or assets of the Company.
The Merger Agreement provides, however, that, prior to receipt of
shareholder approval, the Company may engage in discussions or negotiations
concerning an unsolicited written proposal from a third party with respect to a
Business Combination (and may
66
<PAGE> 77
furnish information and cooperate in this regard) and may take and disclose its
position to its shareholders if, the Board of Directors determines in its good
faith judgment, after consultation with its outside counsel and financial
advisor, that
- such proposal is financially superior to the Merger;
- the soliciting party is reasonably likely to have the funds necessary to
consummate the Business Combination; and
- failing to take any such actions would create a reasonable possibility of
a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
- The Company has agreed not to engage in negotiations with, or disclose
any nonpublic information to, any person unless it receives from such
person an executed confidentiality agreement in reasonably customary form
on terms not materially more favorable to such third party than the
confidentiality agreement between the Company and ONEOK, dated as of
November 20, 1998.
The Company has agreed to notify ONEOK of the receipt of any proposal for a
Business Combination within 24 hours of receiving the proposal. The notice must
include the identity of the person or group making the proposal, the terms and
conditions of the proposal and, if the proposal is in writing, a copy of the
proposal. The Company has also agreed to give ONEOK at least two days' advance
notice of the first delivery of any non-public information to any such person.
The Company has agreed not to enter into a definitive agreement in
connection with a Business Combination unless at least five days have passed
since the Company notified ONEOK of its intention to enter into the agreement
and ONEOK and the Company are unable to agree within such five day period on
adjustments to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement that would
enable the Company to proceed with the Merger on the adjusted terms.
Subject to satisfaction of the conditions described in the previous
paragraph and to payment of a $30 million termination fee, the Company may enter
into an agreement for a Business Combination with the other party, recommend or
endorse another proposal for a Business Combination or withdraw its
recommendation of the Merger.
COVENANTS OF ONEOK
Financing. ONEOK has agreed to use all commercially reasonable efforts to
obtain financing for the Merger. If, notwithstanding such efforts, ONEOK is
unable to deliver the Merger Consideration as a direct result of its inability
to obtain financing for the Merger because of significant disruptions in the
capital and financial markets that make it impracticable for a company having
financial characteristics similar to ONEOK as of the date the Merger Agreement
was executed to finance a transaction of the size and nature of the Merger, the
Company may terminate the Merger Agreement on the earlier of 60 days after the
Merger otherwise would have been consummated and June 14, 2000, without
liability of either party. In addition, ONEOK agreed to cause its long-term debt
to be rated at least BBB- by Standard & Poor's Ratings Group and Baa3 by Moody's
Investor Services, Inc. at the time of consummation of the Merger.
Additional Statutory Approvals. ONEOK has agreed to not enter into any
transaction which would make it necessary for the Company or ONEOK to obtain
additional
67
<PAGE> 78
approvals from any governmental authority in order to consummate the Merger, if,
as a result, the Merger cannot be consummated within the earlier of 60 days
after all other conditions to the Merger have been satisfied and June 14, 2000.
Las Vegas Office. ONEOK has agreed to establish the headquarters for its
operations in Arizona, California and Nevada in Las Vegas, Nevada.
ONEOK Boards. ONEOK has agreed to elect three of the Company's outside
directors to ONEOK's board of directors after the Merger. In addition, ONEOK has
agreed to establish an advisory board consisting of the outside directors of the
Company. The advisory board will advise ONEOK regarding issues of importance to
the communities in which the Company currently has operations, the employees of
ONEOK in Arizona, California and Nevada and the Commissions and FERC.
Indemnification and Insurance of the Company's Directors and Officers. From
and after the Closing Date, ONEOK has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless each of the present and former officers and directors of the Company
from acts or omissions occurring prior to the Closing Date or arising out of any
of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. ONEOK has agreed to
pay the reasonable fees and expenses of counsel for the Company's officers and
directors and to advance, upon request, payment of all documented expenses
reasonably incurred in connection therewith.
This indemnification obligation does not limit any other rights of
indemnification to which the Company's officers and directors may be entitled
under other agreements or insurance policies. This indemnification obligation
is, however, subject to any limitation imposed by applicable law.
If the Merger is consummated and the Complaint or the complaint filed by
Southern Union have not been resolved, the Company's officers and directors
would be entitled to indemnification from ONEOK pursuant to the terms of these
indemnification provisions. For further information on the Complaint and the
complaint filed by Southern Union, see "Litigation Affecting the Merger".
At least until six years after the Closing Date, ONEOK has agreed to
provide officers' and directors' liability insurance in respect of acts or
omissions occurring prior to the Closing Date. The insurance will cover each
person covered by the Company's officers' and directors' liability insurance
policy at the Closing Date, on terms no less favorable than those of the
Company's policy in effect on the date the Merger Agreement was executed.
However, in satisfying this obligation, ONEOK is not obligated to pay premiums
in excess of 200% of the amount per annum that the Company paid for this purpose
in its last full fiscal year. If the premium would exceed the 200% level, ONEOK
is obligated to obtain the best coverage that can be obtained at the 200% level.
OTHER COVENANTS
The Merger Agreement contains mutual agreements of ONEOK and the Company
applicable to consummating the Merger. These include agreements relating to
public announcements, notification of certain matters, access to information,
confidentiality of information (including an acknowledgment by ONEOK of the
Company's obligation to keep confidential information which it has obtained from
Southern Union) and cooperation in connection with making governmental filings
and in obtaining consents and approvals.
68
<PAGE> 79
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The Merger Agreement contains a number of representations and warranties by
both parties. These representations and warranties do not survive the Merger.
The Company and ONEOK and Merger Sub each made representations and
warranties with respect to matters regarding due corporate organization and
qualification, authority to enter into the Merger Agreement and to consummate
the Merger, non-contravention of law, organizational documents and material
contracts, due authorization of the Merger Agreement and the Merger, absence of
material legal proceedings and payment of investment banking fees.
The Company also warranted to ONEOK as to a number of other customary
matters relating to the Company's corporate structure, SEC filings, business
operations, financial statements, tax matters, regulatory matters, employee and
employee benefit matters, environmental matters, hedging matters, year 2000
compliance, insurance, title to properties, condition of assets and absence of
undisclosed liabilities. With respect to the Merger, the Company warranted that
the consummation of the Merger would not result in the triggering of any right
or entitlement under the Company's shareholder rights plan.
ONEOK and Merger Sub also warranted to the Company that:
- neither ONEOK nor Merger Sub was subject to regulation as a "holding
company", a "subsidiary company", or an "affiliate" of any public utility
company under PUHCA; and
- its outside counsel, was willing to deliver an opinion to the effect that
neither the Merger nor the second merger between the Company and ONEOK
would be a taxable transaction for federal income tax purposes to either
the Company or ONEOK.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
Conditions to Each Party's Obligations to Effect the Merger. The
obligations of ONEOK, Merger Sub and the Company to consummate the Merger are
subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent permitted by applicable law,
waiver of the following conditions:
- the Company's shareholders must have approved the principal terms of the
Merger Agreement;
- the Merger must not be prohibited by applicable law, enjoined by any
court, nor may any actions by any governmental authority be pending to
enjoin the Merger (see "Litigation Affecting the Merger");
- all statutory approvals required to be obtained by either ONEOK or the
Company from any governmental authority in order to consummate the Merger
(other than any approvals required to be obtained in connection with
easements, franchises or similar rights) must have been obtained and
become final (see "Regulatory Approvals"); and
- demands for payment of dissenters' rights must not have been filed by 5%
or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (see "Dissenters'
Rights").
69
<PAGE> 80
Conditions to the Obligations of ONEOK and Merger Sub. The obligations of
ONEOK and Merger Sub to effect the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or, to
the extent permitted by applicable law, the waiver by ONEOK of additional
conditions (including the following):
- the Company must have performed in all material respects its obligations
under the Merger Agreement;
- the representations and warranties of the Company must be true as of the
Closing Date (unless the failure of any of them to be true would not be
expected reasonably to have a material adverse effect on the Company);
- the Company must have obtained all necessary third party consents (unless
not having such consents would not reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Company);
- the Merger must not trigger the defensive provisions of the Company's
shareholder rights plan;
- ONEOK must have received a legal opinion from its counsel stating that
neither the Merger nor the second merger of the Company into ONEOK will
be a taxable transaction for the Company or ONEOK for federal income tax
purposes; this is a condition only if there has been a change in, or
amendment to, the federal tax laws (or any regulations thereunder) or any
change in the official interpretation or application of such laws or
regulations, which change or amendment is announced or becomes effective
after December 14, 1998; or
- the statutory approvals received by either the Company or ONEOK from the
Commissions impose terms or conditions (in addition to existing laws,
rules or regulations) which would have, or would reasonably be expected
to have a material adverse effect on the operations of ONEOK in Arizona,
California and Nevada.
Conditions to the Obligations of the Company. The obligation of the Company
to effect the Merger is further subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent
permitted by applicable law, the waiver by the Company of the following
additional conditions:
- ONEOK and Merger Sub must have performed in all material respects their
obligations under the Merger Agreement; and
- certain representations and warranties of ONEOK and Merger Sub must be
true as of the Closing Date (unless the failure of any of them to be true
would not reasonably be expected to prevent or materially impair or delay
the consummation of the Merger).
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The Merger Agreement may be terminated by mutual written consent of the
Company and ONEOK, or by either the Company or ONEOK if:
- the party seeking to terminate the Merger Agreement sends notice of
termination to the other party at any time after the termination date
specified in the Merger Agreement unless the party seeking to terminate
the Merger Agreement is in material breach of the Merger Agreement; the
termination date is December 14, 1999, unless the only condition to the
Merger that has not been satisfied, is the
70
<PAGE> 81
failure to obtain a necessary regulatory approval from a Commission, or
the failure of ONEOK to receive any additional approval from a
governmental authority (see "Summary of the Merger Agreement -- Covenants
of ONEOK -- Additional Statutory Approvals") in which event, the
termination date will be extended to June 14, 2000;
- the Company's shareholders do not approve the principal terms of the
Merger at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof;
- any law or regulation prohibits consummation of the Merger; or
- any judgment, order or decree enjoining the Company or ONEOK from
consummating the Merger is entered and such judgment, order or decree has
become final and non-appealable.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated by ONEOK if:
- any representation or warranty of the Company under the Merger Agreement
is untrue when made and would be reasonably likely to result in a
material adverse effect on the Company, or any covenant of the Company
under the Merger Agreement is breached in any material respect (which, in
either case, is not remedied within 30 days after receipt of notice); or
- the Company's Board withdraws or modifies in a manner adverse to ONEOK
its approval or recommendation of the Merger, recommends or endorses
another Business Combination, the Company enters into an agreement
regarding any Business Combination, other than the Merger, or a third
party acquires more than a 50% interest in the Company.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated by the Company:
- if any representation or warranty of ONEOK under the Merger Agreement is
untrue when made and would be reasonably expected to prevent or
materially impair or delay the consummation of the Merger or any covenant
of ONEOK under the Merger Agreement is breached in any material respect
(which, in either case, is not remedied within 30 days after receipt of
notice);
- if the Company enters into a definitive agreement with respect to a
Business Combination, pays ONEOK a $30 million termination fee and has
complied with its obligations described under the caption "Summary of the
Merger Agreement -- Covenants of the Company -- No Solicitation by the
Company"; or
- by notice to ONEOK on the earlier of June 14, 2000 or 60 days after the
date on which all other conditions to the Merger have been satisfied if,
notwithstanding ONEOK's compliance with its covenant to use all
commercially reasonable efforts to obtain financing, it has been unable
to deliver the Merger Consideration to the paying agent as required as a
direct result of the inability of ONEOK to obtain financing for the
Merger because of significant disruptions in the financial and capital
markets that make it impractical for a company having financial
characteristics similar to those of ONEOK on December 14, 1998 to finance
a transaction of the size and nature of the Merger or any additional
approvals from any governmental authority required to be obtained as a
result of ONEOK's involvement in another transaction have not been
obtained.
71
<PAGE> 82
If the Merger Agreement is validly terminated, none of its provisions
survive (except for certain provisions relating to expenses, waiver of a jury
trial, enforcement rights, confidentiality, and payment of the termination fee,
if required). Termination is without any liability on the part of any party,
unless such party is in breach of its representations or warranties or
obligations under the Merger Agreement, which breach has not been remedied as
provided in the Merger Agreement. For further information, see "Summary of the
Merger Agreement -- Remedies."
AMENDMENTS; WAIVERS
The provisions of the Merger Agreement may be amended or waived if, and
only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing. In addition, after the approval
of the principal terms of the Merger Agreement by the Company's shareholders, no
amendment may alter or change the Merger Consideration, the procedures for
obtaining the Merger Consideration or any of the terms or conditions of the
Merger Agreement which would materially adversely affect the Company's
shareholders, without further shareholder approval.
REMEDIES
Each of the parties is entitled to exercise all remedies available to it
under applicable provisions of law, including seeking injunctive relief. Each of
the parties also agreed to waive its right to a jury trial.
The Company will have a claim against ONEOK for all damages proximately
caused by ONEOK in the event ONEOK violates any of its covenants, including its
covenant to use all commercially reasonable efforts to obtain financing (unless
due to substantial disruptions in the capital markets) and not to enter into any
agreements that would make it necessary for either party to obtain additional
approvals from a governmental authority if, as a result, the Merger cannot be
consummated as provided in the Merger Agreement.
ONEOK will have a claim against the Company for all damages proximately
caused by the Company in the event the Company violates its covenants. The
Company may, however, enter into negotiations with another party regarding a
Business Combination, recommend another proposal for a Business Combination,
withdraw its recommendation of the Merger or enter into an agreement for a
Business Combination with another party if the Company pays ONEOK a $30 million
termination fee and otherwise complies with the "no-solicitation" covenant
previously described, without the payment of any additional damages to ONEOK.
REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company and ONEOK have agreed to cooperate and use all commercially
reasonable efforts to:
- promptly prepare and file all necessary documentation; and
- obtain all necessary permits, consents, approvals and authorizations from
any governmental authority.
It is a condition to the obligations of the Company and ONEOK to consummate
the Merger that all necessary governmental approvals be obtained. It is also a
condition of the obligations of ONEOK to complete the Merger that no condition
be imposed by any of
72
<PAGE> 83
the Commissions that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on the operations of ONEOK in Arizona, California or Nevada. The Company
anticipates that all necessary regulatory approvals will have been received and
become final during the fourth quarter of 1999.
Set forth below is a summary of the regulatory requirements affecting the
Merger.
ANTITRUST CONSIDERATIONS
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the
"HSR Act"), and the rules and regulations thereunder, provide that certain
transactions (including the Merger) may not be consummated until certain
information has been submitted to the Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice and the Federal Trade Commission and specified HSR waiting requirements
have been satisfied. The Company and ONEOK have provided their respective
premerger notification filings pursuant to the HSR Act. The waiting period under
the HSR Act expired on March 28, 1999. The expiration of the HSR waiting period
would not preclude the Antitrust Division or the FTC from challenging the Merger
on antitrust grounds. The Company believes that the Merger will not violate
federal antitrust laws. If the Merger is not consummated within 12 months after
the expiration of the HSR Act waiting period, the Company and ONEOK would be
required to submit new information to the Antitrust Division and the FTC and a
new HSR Act waiting period would have to expire or be earlier terminated before
the Merger could be consummated.
ARIZONA PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATION
Prior approval of the ACC must be obtained in connection with the Merger.
In addition, ONEOK must obtain authorization from the ACC to transact a public
service business in Arizona and must be qualified to do business as a foreign
corporation in Arizona.
Any party to the proceeding on the Merger, or the attorney general on
behalf of the state, may apply for a rehearing within 20 days after the entry of
the ACC's decision on the Merger. If no application is filed within the 20-day
period, the decision will be final, subject to the right of the ACC to rescind,
alter or amend the decision at any time.
Applications were filed by the Company and ONEOK with the ACC on March 2,
1999. A settlement was reached with the staff of the Arizona Corporation
Commission and the Regulatory Utility Consumers Office on June 25, 1999, a
prelude to regulatory approval in Arizona.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATION
Prior approval of the CPUC must be obtained in connection with any business
combination or change in control of a public utility transacting business in
California. In addition, ONEOK must obtain permission to transact business as a
foreign corporation in California from the CPUC and must be qualified to do
business as a foreign corporation in California.
An application for rehearing must be filed within a specified period of
time after the entry of any decision of the CPUC with respect to the Merger,
which time period will be either 10 or 30 days depending upon the manner in
which the CPUC rules on the
73
<PAGE> 84
application. If no application is filed within the specified time period, the
decision of the CPUC will be final, subject to the right of the CPUC to rescind,
alter or amend the decision at any time.
Applications were filed by the Company and ONEOK with the CPUC on February
26, 1999. A prehearing conference was held on May 4, 1999. The CPUC allowed
Southern Union and the attorneys that filed the Complaint to intervene in the
proceedings in California.
NEVADA PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATION
Prior approval of the PUCN must be obtained in connection with the Merger.
In addition, ONEOK must be qualified to transact business as a foreign
corporation in Nevada.
The PUCN is required to act on any application filed in connection with the
Merger within 180 days after the application is filed or the application will be
deemed approved. Any party of record to the proceeding is entitled to judicial
review of any decision of the PUCN if a petition is filed within 90 days after
the service of the decision or, if a rehearing is held, within 30 days after the
decision on the rehearing.
A joint application was filed by the Company and ONEOK with the PUCN on
February 19, 1999. A prehearing conference was held on April 28, 1999. The PUCN
allowed Southern Union to intervene, subject to conditions. Southern Union's
request to delay the proceedings for 30 days was denied.
In May 1999, the Company and ONEOK agreed to a Stipulation with the
Regulatory Operations Staff of the PUCN and the Attorney General's Bureau of
Consumer Protection-Utility Consumer's Advocate for the purpose of narrowing the
issues to be considered by the PUCN. Under the terms of the Stipulation, ONEOK
has agreed that:
- its long-term unsecured debt rating will be at least BBB+ at the time of
the consummation of the Merger,
- no costs associated with the Merger will be charged to the Company's
customers in Nevada,
- it will cooperate with the PUCN in obtaining dismissal of the PGA
litigation pending before the Nevada Supreme Court (see "Parties to the
Merger -- Factors Which May Affect Future Performance -- We May Be
Adversely Affected by the Cost of Purchasing Natural Gas During Periods
in Which Natural Gas Prices Are Volatile" for a discussion of this
litigation),
- it will maintain safety and service quality standards at levels that at
least match that of the Company, and
- it will file a proposed tariff to provide an opportunity for the
Company's customers to obtain natural gas from other suppliers.
On June 21, 1999, the PUCN unanimously approved the joint application on
the terms contained in the Stipulation.
74
<PAGE> 85
OTHER PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATION
ONEOK has represented to the Company that, at the time of execution of the
Merger Agreement, no regulatory approvals were required to be obtained by ONEOK
from either the Kansas Commission or the Oklahoma Commission in order to
complete the Merger.
With the exception of additional approvals from governmental authorities
that may be required as a result of actions taken by ONEOK after execution of
the Merger Agreement, the Company does not believe that there are any other
regulatory approvals that will be required to be obtained by either the Company
or ONEOK from any public utility regulator in order to consummate the Merger.
For further information regarding any additional regulatory approvals that may
be required as a result of actions taken by ONEOK, see "Summary of the Merger
Agreement -- Covenants of ONEOK -- Additional Statutory Approvals."
OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company will be required to provide notice to or to obtain the consent
of other governmental authorities in connection with the transfer of easements,
franchises or other similar rights in connection with the Merger.
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
THIS SECTION SUMMARIZES CERTAIN MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF
THE MERGER TO UNITED STATES SHAREHOLDERS. BECAUSE THIS SECTION IS A GENERAL
SUMMARY, IT DOES NOT DISCUSS ALL OF THE POTENTIALLY RELEVANT FEDERAL INCOME TAX
ISSUES. THIS SECTION DOES NOT ADDRESS THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO
SHAREHOLDERS SUBJECT TO SPECIAL TAX TREATMENT OR TO FOREIGN SHAREHOLDERS.
MOREOVER, THIS SECTION DOES NOT DISCUSS ANY STATE OR LOCAL TAX CONSEQUENCES OF
THE MERGER.
DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE TAX MATTERS INVOLVED AND BECAUSE THE TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER DEPEND ON YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, YOU ARE
URGED TO CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER.
For federal income tax purposes, the Merger will be treated as a sale of
the shares of Common Stock on the Closing Date. As a result, you will recognize
gain or loss for federal income tax purposes on the Closing Date. The gain or
loss will be measured by the difference between the Merger Consideration
received for your shares of Common Stock and your adjusted tax basis in such
shares. If the shares constitute a capital asset in your hands, the gain or loss
that you must recognize pursuant to the Merger will constitute capital gain or
loss. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss to the extent
that your holding period for the shares of Common Stock exceeds one year.
Further, for federal income tax purposes, the receipt of cash in
cancellation of an option is a taxable event. Therefore, if you hold any
employee or director stock options, you will be required to recognize as
ordinary income, in the year of receipt, any cash that
75
<PAGE> 86
you receive in cancellation of such options. In addition, any cash payable to
you will be reduced by the amount of any taxes required to be withheld on such
ordinary income.
To prevent the possibility of backup federal income tax withholding on
payments made to certain shareholders with respect to the Common Stock, you are
required to provide the paying agent with your correct taxpayer identification
number by completing the Substitute Form W-9 to be included with the letter of
transmittal, or any other forms as may be applicable.
OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
After the Merger, the Company's shareholders will no longer have any
interest in the Company or its future earnings, growth or prospects (including
the possibility that the Company might receive an offer in the future to be
acquired by another interested party at a higher price) or the future earnings
or growth of ONEOK. The Common Stock will be deregistered under the federal
securities laws and will no longer be listed for trading on the New York or
Pacific Stock Exchanges or any other exchange.
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
(ITEM 3 ON THE PROXY CARD)
The Board of Directors has selected Arthur Andersen LLP as independent
public accountants for the Company for the year ending December 31, 1999,
subject to ratification of the selection by shareholders. Arthur Andersen LLP
has served as independent public accountants for the Company since 1957. To the
knowledge of the Company, at no time has Arthur Andersen LLP had any direct or
indirect financial interest in or any connection with the Company or any of its
subsidiaries other than in connection with services rendered to the Company as
described below. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at
the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is necessary to ratify the selection of
Arthur Andersen LLP as independent public accountants for the Company.
The selection of Arthur Andersen LLP by the Board of Directors was based on
the recommendation of the Audit Committee, which is composed wholly of outside
directors. The Audit Committee meets periodically with the Company's internal
auditors and independent public accountants to review the scope and results of
the audit function and the policies relating to auditing procedures. In making
its annual recommendation, the Audit Committee reviews both the audit scope and
estimated fees for the coming year. If the shareholders do not ratify this
appointment, other firms of certified public accountants will be considered by
the Board of Directors upon recommendation of the Audit Committee.
During 1998, the Company paid Arthur Andersen LLP for:
- the audit of the annual financial statements;
- reviews of unaudited quarterly financial information;
- assistance and consultation in connection with preparing various SEC
filings;
- the audit of the annual financial statements of the Company's employee
benefit plans;
76
<PAGE> 87
- consultation in connection with various tax and accounting matters; and
- certain other professional services.
The Audit Committee approved the audit and other professional services and
considered the costs of all such services and what effect, if any, performance
of the other professional services might have on the independence of the
accountants.
Representatives of Arthur Andersen LLP will be present at the Annual
Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make statements, if they are so
inclined, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING
If any business not described herein should come before the meeting for
shareholder action, it is intended that the shares represented by proxies will
be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the persons voting them. At the
time this proxy statement was mailed, the Company knew of no other matters which
might be presented for shareholder action at the meeting.
SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Shareholders are advised that any shareholder proposal intended for
consideration at the 2000 Annual Meeting, if held, and inclusion in the
Company's proxy materials for the meeting must be received in writing by the
Company on or before March 2, 2000. If a shareholder intends to offer any
proposal at such meeting without using the Company's proxy materials, notice of
such intended action has to be provided to the Company on or before March 2,
2000, in order for the proposal to be presented for shareholder consideration at
the Annual Meeting. All proposals must comply with applicable SEC rules. It is
recommended that shareholders submitting proposals for inclusion in the
Company's proxy materials or notices to the Company, direct such proposals or
notices to the Corporate Secretary of the Company and utilize Certified
Mail-Return Receipt Requested in order to ensure timely delivery.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
George C. Biehl
Senior Vice President/Chief Financial
Officer & Corporate Secretary
77
<PAGE> 88
APPENDIX A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
BY AND AMONG
ONEOK, INC.,
OASIS ACQUISITION CORPORATION
AND
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
DATED AS OF
DECEMBER 14, 1998
<PAGE> 89
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ARTICLE I
THE MERGERS
Section 1.1 The Mergers.................................... A-1
Section 1.2 Effective Time of the Mergers.................. A-2
Section 1.3 Closing........................................ A-2
Section 1.4 Certificate of Incorporation; By-laws.......... A-2
Section 1.5 Directors and Officers......................... A-2
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION OF SHARES
Section 2.1 Effect of the First Merger..................... A-3
Section 2.2 Exchange of Certificates....................... A-3
Section 2.3 Dissenter's Rights............................. A-5
Section 2.4 Company Option Plans........................... A-6
Section 2.5 Effect of the Second Merger.................... A-6
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
Section 3.1 Organization and Qualification................. A-6
Section 3.2 Subsidiaries................................... A-7
Section 3.3 Capitalization................................. A-7
Section 3.4 Authority; Non-Contravention; Statutory
Approvals; Compliance.......................... A-8
Section 3.5 Reports and Financial Statements............... A-9
Section 3.6 Absence of Certain Changes or Events; Absence
of Undisclosed Liabilities..................... A-10
Section 3.7 Litigation..................................... A-10
Section 3.8 Proxy Statement................................ A-11
Section 3.9 Tax Matters.................................... A-11
Section 3.10 Employee Matters; ERISA........................ A-13
Section 3.11 Environmental.................................. A-16
Section 3.12 Regulation as a Utility........................ A-17
Section 3.13 Vote Required.................................. A-18
Section 3.14 Opinion of Financial Advisor................... A-18
Section 3.15 Brokers........................................ A-18
Section 3.16 Insurance...................................... A-18
Section 3.17 Company Rights Agreement....................... A-18
Section 3.18 Year 2000...................................... A-18
Section 3.19 Hedging........................................ A-18
Section 3.20 Regulatory Proceedings......................... A-19
Section 3.21 Title to Properties............................ A-19
Section 3.22 Condition of Assets............................ A-19
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE> 90
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Section 4.1 Organization and Qualification................. A-19
Section 4.2 Authority; Non-Contravention; Statutory
Approvals; Compliance.......................... A-20
Section 4.3 Information in Proxy Statement................. A-20
Section 4.4 No Prior Activities............................ A-21
Section 4.5 Brokers........................................ A-21
Section 4.6 1935 Act....................................... A-21
Section 4.7 Legal Proceedings.............................. A-21
Section 4.8 Consulting, Employment and Assumption
Agreements................................................ A-21
Section 4.9 Tax Opinion.................................... A-21
ARTICLE V
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGERS
Section 5.1 Conduct of Business of the Company............. A-21
Section 5.2 No Shopping.................................... A-25
ARTICLE VI
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
Section 6.1 Access to Information.......................... A-27
Section 6.2 Proxy Statement................................ A-28
Section 6.3 Regulatory Approvals and Other Matters......... A-28
Section 6.4 Shareholder Approval........................... A-29
Section 6.5 Directors' and Officers' Indemnification....... A-29
Section 6.6 Disclosure Schedules........................... A-30
Section 6.7 Public Announcements........................... A-31
Section 6.8 Employee Benefit Plans......................... A-31
Section 6.9 Company Stock and Incentive Plans.............. A-32
Section 6.10 Expenses....................................... A-33
Section 6.11 Advisory Board................................. A-33
Section 6.12 Notification................................... A-33
Section 6.13 Las Vegas Office............................... A-33
Section 6.14 Additional Statutory Approvals................. A-33
Section 6.15 Further Assurances............................. A-33
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS
Section 7.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect
the Mergers............................................... A-34
Section 7.2 Conditions to Obligation of Parent to Effect
the Mergers............................................... A-34
Section 7.3 Conditions to Obligation of the Company to
Effect the Mergers........................................ A-36
</TABLE>
ii
<PAGE> 91
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
Section 8.1 Termination.................................... A-36
Section 8.2 Effect of Termination.......................... A-38
Section 8.3 Termination Fee; Expenses...................... A-38
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 9.1 Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties,
Covenants and Agreements....................... A-38
Section 9.2 Notices........................................ A-39
Section 9.3 Certain Definitions............................ A-40
Section 9.4 Miscellaneous.................................. A-40
Section 9.5 Interpretation................................. A-41
Section 9.6 Counterparts; Effect........................... A-41
Section 9.7 Parties in Interest............................ A-41
Section 9.8 Waiver of Jury Trial and Certain Damages....... A-41
Section 9.9 Enforcement.................................... A-41
Section 9.10 Amendment...................................... A-41
Section 9.11 Waiver......................................... A-41
Section 9.12 No Remedy in Certain Circumstances............. A-42
Section 9.13 Further Assurances............................. A-42
</TABLE>
Annex A Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as the surviving corporation
in the First Merger
Annex B By-laws of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First Merger
Disclosure Schedules:
Company Disclosure Schedule
Parent Disclosure Schedule
iii
<PAGE> 92
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
-------
<S> <C>
1935 Act.................................................... A-7
401(k) Plan................................................. A-32
affiliate................................................... A-40
Business Combination........................................ A-26-27
Certificates................................................ A-4
CGCL........................................................ A-1
Closing..................................................... A-2
Closing Agreement........................................... A-12
Closing Date................................................ A-2
Company..................................................... A-1
Company Benefit Plans....................................... A-14
Company Common Stock........................................ A-3
Company Disclosure Schedule................................. A-30
Company Financial Statements................................ A-10
Company Material Adverse Effect............................. A-6
Company Meeting............................................. A-29
Company Option Plans........................................ A-6
Company Options............................................. A-6
Company Preference Stock.................................... A-7
Company Preferred Stock..................................... A-7
Company Required Consents................................... A-8
Company Required Statutory Approvals........................ A-9
Company Rights.............................................. A-3
Company Rights Agreement.................................... A-3
Company SEC Reports......................................... A-10
Company Shareholders' Approval.............................. A-18
control..................................................... A-40
Disclosure Schedules........................................ A-30
Dissenting Shares........................................... A-5
DOJ......................................................... A-27
Effective Time.............................................. A-2
Effective Time of the First Merger.......................... A-2
Effective Time of the Second Merger......................... A-2
Environmental Claim......................................... A-17
Environmental Laws.......................................... A-17
Environmental Permits....................................... A-16
ERISA....................................................... A-13
Exchange Act................................................ A-9
FERC........................................................ A-6
Final Order................................................. A-34
First Merger................................................ A-1
First Merger Surviving Corporation Common Stock............. A-3
Foreign Qualifications...................................... A-6
FTC......................................................... A-27
GAAP........................................................ A-10
Governmental Authority...................................... A-8
Hazardous Materials......................................... A-17
</TABLE>
iv
<PAGE> 93
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
-------
<S> <C>
Indemnified Liabilities..................................... A-29
Indemnified Parties......................................... A-29
Indemnified Party........................................... A-29
Initial Termination Date.................................... A-36
IRS......................................................... A-12
joint venture............................................... A-7
Letter Agreement............................................ A-28
Liens....................................................... A-19
Merger Consideration........................................ A-3
Merger Sub.................................................. A-1
Merger Sub Common Stock..................................... A-3
Mergers..................................................... A-1
Merrill Lynch............................................... A-18
MIP......................................................... A-31
OGCA........................................................ A-2
Parent...................................................... A-1
Parent Common Stock......................................... A-32
Parent Disclosure Schedule.................................. A-30
Parent Material Adverse Effect.............................. A-20
Parent Required Consents.................................... A-20
Parent Required Statutory Approvals......................... A-20
Paying Agent................................................ A-3
PBGC........................................................ A-14
PCBs........................................................ A-17
Person...................................................... A-40
Power Act................................................... A-9
Preferred Securities........................................ A-22
Proxy Statement............................................. A-11
Qualified Plans............................................. A-31
Releases.................................................... A-17
Representatives............................................. A-27
SEC......................................................... A-9
Second Merger............................................... A-1
Securities Act.............................................. A-9
SERP........................................................ A-32
Shares...................................................... A-3
Southwest Division.......................................... A-33
subsidiary.................................................. A-6
Superior Proposal........................................... A-27
Surviving Corporation....................................... A-1
Tax Return.................................................. A-11
Tax Ruling.................................................. A-12
Taxes....................................................... A-11
Violation................................................... A-8
Welfare Plans............................................... A-14
</TABLE>
v
<PAGE> 94
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of December 14, 1998, by and among
ONEOK, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation ("Parent"), Oasis Acquisition Corporation,
a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"),
and Southwest Gas Corporation, a California corporation (the "Company").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have
each approved, and deem it advisable and in the best interests of their
respective shareholders to consummate, the acquisition of the Company by Parent
upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance thereof, the respective Boards of Directors of
Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have approved this Agreement and the merger
of Merger Sub with and into the Company, with the Company being the surviving
corporation (the "First Merger"), and the merger of the Company, as the
surviving corporation in the First Merger, with and into Parent, with Parent
being the surviving corporation (the "Second Merger," and together with the
First Merger, the "Mergers");
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE MERGERS
SECTION 1.1 The Mergers. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of
this Agreement:
(a) At the Effective Time of the First Merger (as defined in Section
1.2), Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company in accordance
with the laws of the State of California. The Company will be the surviving
corporation in the First Merger and will continue its corporate existence
under the laws of the State of California. The First Merger will have the
effect as provided in the applicable provisions of the California General
Corporation Law ("CGCL"). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
upon the First Merger, all the rights, privileges, immunities, powers and
franchises of the Company and Merger Sub will vest in the Company, as the
surviving corporation in the First Merger, and all obligations, duties,
debts and liabilities of the Company and Merger Sub shall be the
obligations, duties, debts and liabilities of the Company, as the surviving
corporation in the First Merger. Throughout this Agreement, the term the
"Company" refers to the Company prior to the First Merger or to the Company
as the surviving corporation in the First Merger, as the context requires.
(b) At the Effective Time of the Second Merger (as defined in Section
1.2), the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First Merger, will
be merged with and into Parent in accordance with the laws of the States of
Oklahoma and California. Parent will be the surviving corporation in the
Second Merger (the "Surviving Corporation") and will continue its corporate
existence under the laws of the State of
A-1
<PAGE> 95
Oklahoma. The Second Merger will have the effect as provided in the
applicable provisions of the Oklahoma General Corporation Act ("OGCA") and
the CGCL. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, upon the Second
Merger, all the rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises of
the Company and Parent will vest in the Surviving Corporation and all
obligations, duties, debts and liabilities of the Company and Parent will
be the obligations, duties, debts and liabilities of the Surviving
Corporation.
SECTION 1.2 Effective Time of the Mergers. On the Closing Date (as defined
in Section 1.3), with respect to the First Merger, this Agreement and duly
executed officers' certificates will be filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of California in accordance with the CGCL with respect to the First
Merger. The First Merger will become effective upon filing this Agreement and
the officers' certificates (the "Effective Time of the First Merger"). On the
Closing Date, with respect to the Second Merger, a certificate of ownership and
merger complying with the requirements of the OGCA will be executed and filed
with the Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma and this Agreement and a
duly executed certificate of ownership complying with the requirements of the
CGCL will be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of California. The
Second Merger will become effective upon filing the certificate of ownership and
merger and this Agreement and the certificate of ownership (the "Effective Time
of the Second Merger"). Throughout this Agreement, "Effective Time" means the
Effective Time of the First Merger or the Effective Time of the Second Merger,
together or as applicable. The First Merger will occur immediately prior to the
Second Merger.
SECTION 1.3 Closing. Unless this Agreement has been terminated and the
transactions contemplated herein have been abandoned pursuant to Article VIII
hereof, the closing of the Mergers (the "Closing") will take place at 10:00
a.m., Central time, on a date (the "Closing Date") to be specified by the
parties, which shall be no later than the second business day after satisfaction
or waiver of all of the conditions set forth in Article VII hereof, at the
offices of Parent, unless another date or place is agreed to in writing by the
parties hereto.
SECTION 1.4 Certificate of Incorporation; By-laws. Pursuant to the
Mergers, (a)(i) the Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as the surviving
corporation in the First Merger, shall read as set forth in Annex A hereto,
until thereafter amended as provided by law and such Articles of Incorporation
and (ii) the By-laws of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First
Merger, shall read as set forth in Annex B hereto, until thereafter amended as
provided by law, the Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as the surviving
corporation in the First Merger, and such By-laws and (b)(i) the Certificate of
Incorporation of Parent, as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time of
the Second Merger, shall be the Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter amended as provided by law and such Certificate of
Incorporation and (ii) the By-laws of Parent, as in effect immediately prior to
the Effective Time of the Second Merger, shall be the By-laws of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter amended as provided by law, the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation and such By-laws.
SECTION 1.5 Directors and Officers.
(a) The directors and officers of Merger Sub immediately prior to the
Effective Time of the First Merger will be the directors and officers of the
Company, as the surviving corporation in the First Merger, each to hold office
in accordance with the Articles of
A-2
<PAGE> 96
Incorporation and By-laws of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the
First Merger.
(b) The directors and officers of Parent immediately prior to the Effective
Time of the Second Merger will be the directors and officers of the Surviving
Corporation, each to hold office in accordance with the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws of the Surviving Corporation; provided that, after the
Effective Time of the Second Merger, the Surviving Corporation will, following
the Effective Time of the Second Merger, elect to the Board of Directors of the
Surviving Corporation three individuals to be selected by Parent from the Board
of Directors of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time of the First
Merger.
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION OF SHARES
SECTION 2.1 Effect of the First Merger. As of the Effective Time of the
First Merger, by virtue of the First Merger and without any action on the part
of the holders of any shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the
Company (referred to herein as "Shares" or "Company Common Stock") or of common
stock, no par value per share, of Merger Sub ("Merger Sub Common Stock"):
(a) Each issued and outstanding share of Company Common Stock (other
than Dissenting Shares (as defined in Section 2.3) covered by Section 2.3)
and each associated stock purchase right (the "Company Rights") issued
pursuant to the Rights Agreement, dated as of March 5, 1996, as amended,
between the Company and Harris Trust Company, as Rights Agent (the "Company
Rights Agreement"), which will be terminated at the Effective Time of the
First Merger (references herein to Company Common Stock or Shares will be
deemed to include the associated Company Rights), will be converted into
the right to receive $28.50 per share in cash, payable to the holder
thereof, without interest (the "Merger Consideration"), upon surrender of
the certificate formerly representing such share of Company Common Stock in
the manner provided in Section 2.2. All such shares of Company Common
Stock, when so converted, shall no longer be outstanding and shall be
canceled and automatically converted into the right to receive the Merger
Consideration therefor upon the surrender of such certificate in accordance
with Section 2.2. Any payment made pursuant to this Section 2.1(a) shall be
made net of applicable withholding taxes to the extent such withholding is
required by law.
(b) Each issued and outstanding share of Merger Sub Common Stock shall
be converted into and become one fully paid and nonassessable share of
common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company, as the surviving
corporation in the First Merger ("First Merger Surviving Corporation Common
Stock").
SECTION 2.2 Exchange of Certificates.
(a) Parent's registrar and transfer agent, or such other bank or trust
company as may be selected by Parent, will act as paying agent ("Paying Agent")
for the holders of Shares in connection with the First Merger, pursuant to an
agreement providing for the matters set forth in this Section 2.2 and such other
matters as may be appropriate and the terms of which shall be reasonably
satisfactory to Parent and the Company, to receive the funds to which holders of
Shares become entitled pursuant to Section 2.1(a). Following the
A-3
<PAGE> 97
Effective Time, Parent will deposit in trust with the Paying Agent for the
benefit of holders of Company Common Stock the funds necessary to pay the
aggregate Merger Consideration as contemplated by Section 2.1(a) with respect to
shares of Company Common Stock.
(b) At the Effective Time of the First Merger, Parent will instruct the
Paying Agent to promptly, and in any event not later than three business days
following the Effective Time of the First Merger, mail (and to make available
for collection by hand) to each holder of record of a certificate or
certificates, which immediately prior to the Effective Time of the First Merger
represented outstanding shares of Company Common Stock (the "Certificates"),
whose Shares were converted pursuant to Section 2.1(a) into the right to receive
the Merger Consideration (i) a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that
delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall
pass, only upon delivery of the Certificates to the Paying Agent and shall be in
such form and have such other provisions as Parent may reasonably specify) and
(ii) instructions (which shall provide that at the election of the surrendering
holder Certificates may be surrendered, and payment therefor collected, by hand
delivery) for use in effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for
payment of the Merger Consideration. Upon surrender of a Certificate for
cancellation to the Paying Agent or to such other agent or agents as may be
appointed by Parent, together with such letter of transmittal, duly executed,
the holder of such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor
the Merger Consideration for each share of Company Common Stock formerly
represented by such Certificate, to be mailed (or made available for collection
by hand if so elected by the surrendering holder) within three business days of
receipt thereof, and the Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled.
If payment of the Merger Consideration is to be made to a Person other than the
Person in whose name the surrendered Certificate is registered, it shall be a
condition of payment that the Certificate so surrendered shall be properly
endorsed or shall be otherwise in proper form for transfer and that the Person
requesting such payment shall have paid any transfer and other taxes required by
reason of the payment of the Merger Consideration to a Person other than the
registered holder of the Certificate surrendered or shall have established to
the satisfaction of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First
Merger, or the Surviving Corporation that such tax either has been paid or is
not applicable. Until surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.2, each
Certificate (other than Certificates representing Company Common Stock held by
Parent or Merger Sub, or any subsidiary of Parent or Merger Sub, or Dissenting
Shares) shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time of the First Merger
to represent only the right to receive the Merger Consideration in cash as
contemplated by this Section 2.2.
(c) The Paying Agent shall invest the funds, as directed by Parent, in (i)
direct obligations of the United States of America, (ii) obligations for which
the full faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged to provide
for the payment of principal and interest or (iii) commercial paper rated the
highest quality by either Moody's Investors Services, Inc. or Standard & Poor's
Corporation. Any net earnings with respect to such funds shall be the property
of and paid over to Parent as and when requested by Parent; provided, however,
that any such investment or any such payment of earnings may not delay the
receipt by holders of Certificates of the Merger Consideration.
(d) In the event any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed,
upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming such
Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Paying Agent will issue in
exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the Merger Consideration
deliverable in respect thereof as determined in
A-4
<PAGE> 98
accordance with this Article II, provided that the Person to whom the Merger
Consideration is paid shall, as a condition precedent to the payment thereof,
give the Company or the Surviving Corporation, as the case may be, a bond in
such sum as it may direct or otherwise indemnify the Company or the Surviving
Corporation, as the case may be, in a manner satisfactory to it against any
claim that may be made against the Company or the Surviving Corporation, as the
case may be, with respect to the Certificate claimed to have been lost, stolen
or destroyed.
(e) After the Effective Time of the First Merger, the stock transfer books
of the Company shall be closed and there shall be no transfers on the stock
transfer books of the Company, as the surviving corporation in the First Merger,
or the Surviving Corporation of Shares that were outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time of the First Merger. If, after the Effective Time of the
First Merger, Certificates are presented to the Company, as the surviving
corporation in the First Merger, or the Surviving Corporation, they shall be
canceled and exchanged for the Merger Consideration as provided in this Article
II.
(f) Any portion of the funds held by the Paying Agent that remain
undistributed to the former shareholders of the Company for one year after the
Effective Time shall be delivered by the Paying Agent to the Surviving
Corporation, which shall thereafter act as the Paying Agent, and any former
shareholders of the Company who have not complied with this Article II prior to
one year after the Effective Time shall thereafter look only as a general
creditor to the Surviving Corporation for payment of their claim for the Merger
Consideration.
(g) The Surviving Corporation shall not be liable to any holder of Company
Common Stock for Merger Consideration delivered to a public official pursuant to
any applicable abandonment, escheat or similar law. Any amounts remaining
unclaimed by holders of any such shares six years after the Effective Time (or
such earlier date immediately prior to the time at which such amounts would
otherwise escheat to or become property of any Governmental Authority) shall, to
the extent permitted by applicable law, become the property of the Surviving
Corporation, free and clear of any claims or interests of any such holders or
their successors, assigns or personal representatives previously entitled
thereto.
SECTION 2.3 Dissenter's Rights. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement
to the contrary, Shares outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time of
the First Merger and constituting "dissenting shares" (as defined in Section
1300 of CGCL) ("Dissenting Shares"), shall not be converted into the right to
receive the Merger Consideration, as provided in Section 2.1(a) hereof, unless
and until such holder fails to perfect or effectively withdraws or otherwise
loses his right to appraisal and payment under the CGCL. If, after the Effective
Time of the First Merger, any such holder fails to perfect or effectively
withdraws or loses his right to appraisal, such Dissenting Shares shall
thereupon be treated as if they had been converted as of the Effective Time of
the First Merger into the right to receive the Merger Consideration to which
such holder is entitled, without interest or dividends thereon. The Company
shall give Parent prompt notice of any demands received by the Company for
appraisal of Shares, and, prior to the Effective Time of the First Merger,
Parent shall have the right to participate in all negotiations and proceedings
with respect to such demands. Prior to the Effective Time of the First Merger,
the Company shall not, except with the prior written consent of Parent, make any
payment with respect to or offer to settle, any such demands.
A-5
<PAGE> 99
SECTION 2.4 Company Option Plans.
(a) The Company shall take all actions necessary to provide that, upon the
Effective Time, each then outstanding option to purchase shares of Company
Common Stock or other similar interest (collectively, the "Company Options"),
granted under any of the Company's stock option plans or under any other plan or
arrangement (the "Company Option Plans"), whether or not then exercisable or
vested, all of which, together with the applicable exercise prices, are
disclosed in Section 3.10 of the Company Disclosure Schedule (or as otherwise
permitted from and after the date of this Agreement pursuant to Section 5.1(c)
or (i)), shall be adjusted such that, upon exercise of a Company Option, the
holder of such Company Option would be entitled to receive only an amount in
respect thereof equal to the product of (i) the excess, if any, of the Merger
Consideration over the per share exercise price thereof and (ii) the number of
shares of Company Common Stock subject thereto (such payment to be net of
applicable withholding taxes).
(b) The Company Option Plans will terminate as of the Effective Time of the
Second Merger in accordance with the terms thereof.
SECTION 2.5 Effect of the Second Merger. As of the Effective Time of the
Second Merger, by virtue of the Second Merger, each share of First Merger
Surviving Corporation Common Stock will automatically be canceled and retired
and will cease to exist, and no consideration will be delivered in exchange
therefor.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Sub as follows:
SECTION 3.1 Organization and Qualification. Each of the Company and its
subsidiaries is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of its state of incorporation, has all requisite
corporate power and authority, and has been duly authorized by all necessary
approvals and orders of the California Public Utilities Commission, the Arizona
Corporations Commission, the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada and the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the "FERC"), to own, lease and operate its
assets and properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted,
and is duly qualified and in good standing to do business in each jurisdiction
in which the nature of its business or the ownership or leasing of its assets
and properties makes such qualification necessary ("Foreign Qualifications")
other than in such jurisdictions where the failure to be so qualified and in
good standing would not, when taken together with all other such failures,
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business,
assets, properties (including intangible properties), condition (financial or
otherwise), results of operations, prospects, liabilities or regulatory status
of the Company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole or on the consummation of
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (any such material
adverse effect being hereinafter referred to as a "Company Material Adverse
Effect"). As used in this Agreement, the term "subsidiary" of a Person (as
defined in Section 9.3) shall mean any corporation or other entity (including
partnerships, limited liability entities and other business associations and
joint ventures) in which such Person directly or indirectly owns at least a
majority of the outstanding voting securities, equity, partnership interests,
membership interests or the like. True, accurate and complete copies of the
articles of
A-6
<PAGE> 100
incorporation and by-laws of the Company, as in effect on the date hereof, have
been delivered to Parent.
SECTION 3.2 Subsidiaries. Section 3.2 of the Company Disclosure Schedule
(as defined in Section 6.6) sets forth the name of each subsidiary and joint
venture of the Company, the state or jurisdiction of its incorporation or
formation, the states of any Foreign Qualifications and the Company's interest
therein. None of such entities is a "public utility company," a "holding
company," a "subsidiary company" or an "affiliate" of any public utility company
within the meaning of Section 2(a)(5), 2(a)(7), 2(a)(8) or 2(a)(11),
respectively, of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended (the
"1935 Act"). Except as set forth in Section 3.2 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or other
securities of, or interests in, each subsidiary or joint venture of the Company
are validly issued, fully paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights, are
owned directly or indirectly by the Company free and clear of any liens, claims,
encumbrances, security interests, equities, charges and options of any nature
whatsoever, and there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, calls,
contracts, voting trusts, proxies or other commitments, understandings,
restrictions, arrangements, rights or warrants, including any right of
conversion or exchange under any outstanding security, instrument or other
agreement, obligating any such subsidiary to issue, transfer or sell, or cause
to be issued, transferred or sold, any shares of its capital stock or other
equity interest or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares
or equity interests or obligating it to grant, extend or enter into any such
agreement or commitment. As used in this Agreement, the term "joint venture" of
a Person shall mean any corporation or other entity (including partnerships and
other business associations and joint ventures) in which such Person or one or
more of its subsidiaries owns an equity interest that is less than a majority of
any class of the outstanding voting securities or equity, other than equity
interests held for passive investment purposes that are less than 5% of any
class of the outstanding voting securities or equity of any such entity. Except
as set forth in Section 3.2 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, true, accurate
and complete copies of the articles of incorporation, by-laws or similar
governing documents of each subsidiary and joint venture of the Company, as in
effect on the date hereof, have been delivered to Parent.
SECTION 3.3 Capitalization. The authorized capital stock of the Company
consists of 45,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock, 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, no par value per share ("Company Preferred Stock"), and
2,000,000 shares of preference stock, par value $20 per share ("Company
Preference Stock"). As of the close of business on December 11, 1998, 30,389,128
shares of Company Common Stock and no shares of Company Preferred Stock or
Company Preference Stock were issued and outstanding. All of the issued and
outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company are validly issued, fully
paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights. Except as set forth in
Section 3.3 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, there are no (a) outstanding
subscriptions, options, calls, contracts, voting trusts, proxies or other
commitments, understandings, restrictions, arrangements, rights or warrants,
including any right of conversion or exchange under any outstanding security,
instrument or other agreement obligating the Company or any of its subsidiaries
to issue, transfer or sell, or cause to be issued, transferred or sold, any
shares of capital stock or other equity interest in, the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares or
equity interests or obligating the Company or any of its subsidiaries to grant,
extend or enter into any such agreement or commitment, (b) contractual
obligations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any capital stock of the Company or any
A-7
<PAGE> 101
subsidiary of the Company or (c) voting trusts or similar agreements to which
the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party with respect to the voting of
the capital stock of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
SECTION 3.4 Authority; Non-Contravention; Statutory Approvals; Compliance.
(a) Authority. The Company has all requisite power and authority to enter
into this Agreement, and, subject to the applicable Company Shareholders'
Approval (as defined in Section 3.13) and the Company Required Statutory
Approvals (as defined in subsection (c) of this Section 3.4), to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, the Mergers.
The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company
of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all
necessary corporate action on the part of the Company, subject to obtaining the
Company Shareholders' Approval. This Agreement has been duly and validly
executed and delivered by the Company, and assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery hereof by Parent and Merger Sub, constitutes the valid
and binding obligation of the Company enforceable against the Company in
accordance with its terms, except as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or similar laws relating to or affecting creditors'
rights generally and by general principles of equity.
(b) Non-Contravention. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the
Company does not, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby,
including, without limitation, the Mergers, will not, violate or result in a
breach of any provision of, or constitute a default (with or without notice or
lapse of time or both) under, or result in the termination or modification of,
or accelerate the performance required by, or result in a right of termination,
cancellation, or acceleration of any obligation or the loss of a material
benefit under, or result in the creation of any lien, security interest, charge
or encumbrance upon any of the properties or assets (any such violation, breach,
default, right of termination, modification, cancellation or acceleration, loss
or creation, a "Violation") of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or joint
ventures pursuant to any provisions of (i) the Articles of Incorporation,
By-laws or similar governing documents of the Company or any of its subsidiaries
or joint ventures, (ii) subject to obtaining the Company Required Statutory
Approvals and the receipt of the Company Shareholders' Approvals, any statute,
law, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, order, injunction, writ,
permit or license of any Governmental Authority (as hereinafter defined)
applicable to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or joint ventures or any of
their respective properties or assets or (iii) subject to obtaining the
third-party consents or other approvals set forth in Section 3.4(b) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule (the "Company Required Consents") and the Company
Required Statutory Approvals (as defined in clause (c) below), any easement or
other similar right to use or access real property, note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, deed of trust, license, franchise, permit, concession, contract,
lease or other instrument, obligation or agreement of any kind to which the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or any joint venture of the Company is now a
party or by which it or any of its properties or assets may be bound or
affected, excluding from the foregoing clauses (ii) and (iii) such Violations
that would not, in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Statutory Approvals. Except as described in Section 3.4(c) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, no declaration, filing or registration with, or
notice to or authorization, consent or approval of, any court, governmental or
regulatory body (including a stock exchange or other self-regulatory body) or
authority, federal, state, local or foreign (each, a "Governmental Authority"),
is required to be obtained, made or given
A-8
<PAGE> 102
by or on behalf of the Company for the execution and delivery of this Agreement
by the Company or the consummation by the Company of the transactions
contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, the Mergers, the failure of
which to obtain, make or give would have, in the aggregate, a Company Material
Adverse Effect (the "Company Required Statutory Approvals", it being understood
that references in this Agreement to "obtaining" such Company Required Statutory
Approvals shall mean making such declarations, filings or registrations; giving
such notices; obtaining such authorizations, consents or approvals; and having
such waiting periods expire as are necessary to avoid a violation of law).
(d) Compliance. Except as set forth in Section 3.4(d) or Section 3.7 of the
Company Disclosure Schedule or as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports (as
defined in Section 3.5), neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries nor, to
the knowledge of the Company, any joint ventures of the Company, is in violation
of or, to the knowledge of the Company, is under investigation with respect to,
or has been given notice or been charged with any violation of, any law,
statute, order, rule, regulation, ordinance or judgments (including, without
limitation, applicable Environmental Laws, as hereinafter defined) of any
Governmental Authority, except for violations that, in the aggregate, do not
have, and, to the knowledge of the Company, would not reasonably be expected to
have, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Except as set forth in Section 3.4(d)
or Section 3.7 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company and its
subsidiaries and any joint ventures have all easements or other similar rights
to use or access real property, permits, licenses, franchises and other
governmental authorizations, consents and approvals necessary to conduct their
businesses as currently conducted, except those of which the failure to obtain
would not, in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. Except as set forth in Section 3.4(d) or Section 3.7 of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company or any of its subsidiaries nor,
to the knowledge of the Company, any joint venture of the Company is in breach
or violation of or in default in the performance or observance of any term or
provision of, and no event has occurred which, with lapse of time or action by a
third party or both (i) would result in a default by the Company or any
subsidiary of the Company or, to the knowledge of the Company, any joint venture
of the Company under its articles of incorporation, by-laws or other governing
documents or (ii) would reasonably be expected to result in a default by the
Company or any subsidiary of the Company or, to the knowledge of the Company,
any joint venture of the Company under any easement or other similar right to
use or access real property, contract, commitment, agreement, indenture,
mortgage, loan agreement, note, lease, bond, license, approval, permit,
franchise or other instrument to which it is a party or by which the Company or
any subsidiary or joint venture of the Company is bound or to which any of its
property is subject, except in the case of clause (ii) for possible violations,
breaches or defaults which individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably
be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
SECTION 3.5 Reports and Financial Statements. Since January 1, 1995, the
filings required to be made by the Company and its subsidiaries under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"), applicable state laws and regulations regulating
public utilities or the Federal Power Act (the "Power Act") have been filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), the California Public
Utilities Commission, the Arizona Corporations Commission, the Public Utilities
Commission of Nevada or the FERC, as the case may be, and complied in all
material respects with all applicable requirements of the appropriate act and
the rules and regulations thereunder. The Company has made available to Parent a
true and complete copy of each report, schedule, registration statement and
A-9
<PAGE> 103
definitive proxy statement filed by the Company with the SEC since January 1,
1995 (as such documents have since the time of their filing been amended, the
"Company SEC Reports"). As of their respective dates, the Company SEC Reports
did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading. The audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited interim
financial statements of the Company included in the Company SEC Reports
(collectively, the "Company Financial Statements") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent
basis ("GAAP") (except as may be indicated therein or in the notes thereto and
except with respect to unaudited statements as permitted by Form 10-Q of the
SEC) and fairly present the financial position of the Company and its
subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and the results of their operations and
cash flows for the periods then ended, subject, in the case of the unaudited
interim financial statements, to normal, recurring audit adjustments.
SECTION 3.6 Absence of Certain Changes or Events; Absence of Undisclosed
Liabilities.
(a) Absence of Changes. Except as set forth in the Company SEC Reports
filed prior to the date of this Agreement or Section 3.6(a) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, from December 31, 1997, through the date hereof, (i) each
of the Company and its subsidiaries has conducted its business only in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (ii) there has not
been, and no fact or condition exists which would have or, to the knowledge of
the Company, is reasonably expected to have, a Company Material Adverse Effect
and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries have not taken action that if taken
after the date hereof would constitute a violation of Section 5.1 hereof.
(b) No Undisclosed Liabilities. Neither the Company nor any of its
subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations (whether absolute, accrued,
contingent or otherwise) of a nature required by GAAP to be reflected in a
consolidated corporate balance sheet, except liabilities, obligations or
contingencies that (i) are accrued or reserved against in the Company Financial
Statements or reflected in the notes thereto, (ii) were incurred in the ordinary
course of business, (iii) would not reasonably be expected, in the aggregate, to
have a Company Material Adverse Effect or (iv) are set forth in Section 3.6(b)
of the Company Disclosure Schedule.
SECTION 3.7 Litigation. Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports
filed prior to the date of this Agreement or as set forth in Section 3.7 of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, through the date hereof (i) there is no claim,
suit, action or proceeding pending, or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened, or, to the knowledge of the Company, any investigation or review
pending or threatened, relating to or affecting the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or joint ventures and (ii) there is no judgment, decree, injunction
or order of any court, governmental department, commission, agency,
instrumentality or authority or any arbitrator applicable to the Company or any
of its subsidiaries that, when taken together with any of the matters described
in clauses (i) or (ii), would reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. In addition, except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports
filed prior to the date of this Agreement or as set forth in Section 3.7 of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, there have not been any developments since December
31, 1997, with respect to such disclosed
A-10
<PAGE> 104
claims, suits, actions, proceedings, investigations or reviews, that, in the
aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect.
SECTION 3.8 Proxy Statement. None of the information supplied or to be
supplied by or on behalf of the Company in the proxy statement, in definitive
form, relating to the Company Meeting (as defined in Section 6.4) to be held in
connection with the First Merger (the "Proxy Statement") will, at the date
mailed to the Company's shareholders, at any time the Proxy Statement is amended
or supplemented and at the time of the Company Meeting (giving effect to any
documents incorporated by reference therein), contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading. The Proxy Statement
will comply as to form in all material respects with the applicable provisions
of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
SECTION 3.9 Tax Matters. "Taxes," as used in this Agreement, means any
federal, state, county, local or foreign taxes, charges, fees, levies, or other
assessments, including all net income, gross income, sales and use, ad valorem,
transfer, gains, profits, excise, franchise, real and personal property, gross
receipt, capital stock, production, business and occupation, disability,
employment, payroll, license, estimated, stamp, custom duties, severance or
withholding taxes or charges imposed by any governmental entity, and includes
any interest and penalties (civil or criminal) on or additions to any such taxes
and any expenses incurred in connection with the determination, settlement or
litigation of any tax liability. "Tax Return," as used in this Agreement, means
a report, return or other information required to be supplied to a governmental
entity with respect to Taxes including, where permitted or required, combined or
consolidated returns for any group of entities that include the Company or any
of its subsidiaries.
(a) Filing of Timely Tax Returns. The Company and each of its subsidiaries
have filed all material Tax Returns required to be filed by each of them under
applicable law. All Tax Returns were in all material respects (and, as to Tax
Returns not filed as of the date hereof, will be) true, complete and correct and
filed on a timely basis.
(b) Payment of Taxes. The Company and each of its subsidiaries have, in all
material respects, within the time and in the manner prescribed by law, paid
(and until the Closing Date will pay within the time and in the manner
prescribed by law) all material Taxes that are currently due and payable except
for those contested in good faith and for which adequate reserves have been
taken.
(c) Tax Liens. There are no material Tax liens upon the assets of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries except liens for Taxes not yet due.
(d) Withholding Taxes. The Company and each of its subsidiaries have
complied (and until the Closing Date will comply) in all material respects with
the provisions of the Code relating to the payment and withholding of Taxes,
including, without limitation, the withholding and reporting requirements under
Code sec.sec. 1441 through 1446, 3401 through 3509, and 6041 and 6049, as well
as similar provisions under any other laws, and have, in all material respects,
within the time and in the manner prescribed by law, withheld from employee
wages and paid over to the proper governmental authorities all material amounts
required.
A-11
<PAGE> 105
(e) Extensions of Time for Filing Tax Returns. Neither the Company nor any
of its subsidiaries has requested any extension of time within which to file any
Tax Return, which Tax Return has not since been filed.
(f) Waivers of Statute of Limitations. Neither the Company nor any of its
subsidiaries has executed any outstanding waivers or comparable consents
regarding the application of the statute of limitations with respect to any
Taxes or Tax Returns.
(g) Expiration of Statute of Limitations. Except as set forth in Section
3.9(g) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the statute of limitations for the
assessment of material Taxes has expired for all applicable Tax Returns of the
Company and each of its subsidiaries or those Tax Returns have been examined by
the appropriate taxing authorities for all periods through the date hereof, and
no deficiency for any material Taxes has been asserted or assessed against the
Company or any of its subsidiaries that has not been resolved and paid in full.
(h) Audit, Administrative and Court Proceedings. Except as set forth in
Section 3.9(h) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, no audits or other
administrative proceedings or court proceedings are presently in process, and no
material issue raised by the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") or a state
taxing authority in a written notice delivered to the Company remains unsettled,
with regard to any Taxes or Tax Returns of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries.
(i) Powers of Attorney. Except as set forth in Section 3.9(i) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, no power of attorney currently in force has been
granted by the Company or any of its subsidiaries concerning any Tax matter.
(j) Tax Rulings. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has
received a Tax Ruling (as defined below) or entered into a Closing Agreement (as
defined below) with any taxing authority that would reasonably be expected to
result in a Company Material Adverse Effect after the Closing Date. "Tax
Ruling," as used in this Agreement, shall mean a written ruling of a taxing
authority relating to Taxes. "Closing Agreement," as used in this Agreement,
shall mean a written and legally binding agreement with a taxing authority
relating to Taxes.
(k) Availability of Tax Returns. The Company and its subsidiaries have made
available to Parent complete and accurate copies of (i) all material Tax
Returns, and any amendments thereto, filed by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries since January 1, 1990, (ii) all material audit reports received
from any taxing authority relating to any Tax Return filed by the Company or any
of its subsidiaries since January 1, 1990 and (iii) any Closing Agreements
entered into by the Company or any of its subsidiaries with any taxing authority
since January 1, 1990.
(l) Tax Sharing Agreements. Except as disclosed in Section 3.9(l) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, no agreements relating to allocating or sharing of
Taxes exist between or among the Company and any of its subsidiaries.
(m) Code sec. 341(f). Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has
filed (or will file prior to the Closing) a consent pursuant to Code sec. 341(f)
or has agreed to have Code sec. 341(f)(2) apply to any disposition of a
subsection (f) asset (as that term is defined in Code sec. 341(f)(4)) owned by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
(n) Code sec. 168. No material property of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries is property that the Company or any such subsidiary or any party to
this transaction is or will
A-12
<PAGE> 106
be required to treat as being owned by another person pursuant to the provisions
of Code sec. 168(f)(8) (as in effect prior to its amendment by the Tax Reform
Act of 1986) or is "tax-exempt use property" within the meaning of Code
sec. 168.
(o) Code sec. 481 Adjustments. Except as set forth in Section 3.9(o) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is
required to include in income for any period ending after the date of this
Agreement any adjustment pursuant to Code sec. 481(a) by reason of a voluntary
change in accounting method initiated by the Company or any of its subsidiaries,
and to the best of the knowledge of the Company, the IRS has not proposed any
such adjustment or change in accounting method.
(p) Code sec.sec. 6661 and 6662. To the knowledge of the Company, all
transactions that could give rise to a material understatement of federal income
tax (within the meaning of Code sec. 6661 or Code sec. 6662) that would
reasonably be expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect have been
adequately disclosed (or, with respect to Tax Returns filed following the
Closing will be adequately disclosed) on the Tax Returns of the Company and its
subsidiaries in accordance with Code sec. 6661(b)(2)(B) or Code
sec. 6662(d)(2)(B).
(q) Code sec. 280G. Except as set forth in Section 3.9(q) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party
to any agreement, contract, or arrangement that as a direct consequence of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement will result in the obligation for
any "excess parachute payments" within the meaning of Code sec. 280G.
(r) Code sec. 162(m). Except as set forth in Section 3.9(r) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, the Company does not maintain any compensation plan,
program or arrangement the payment under which would not reasonably be expected
to be deductible as a result of the limitations of Code sec. 162(m) and the
Treasury Regulations issued thereunder.
(s) Liability for Others. Except as set forth in Section 3.9(s) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has
any material liability for Taxes of any person other than the Company and its
subsidiaries under Treasury Regulations Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar
provision of state, local or foreign law) as a transferee or successor, by
contract or otherwise.
SECTION 3.10 Employee Matters; ERISA.
(a) Benefit Plans. Section 3.10(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule
contains a true and complete list as of the date of this Agreement of each
employee benefit plan, program or arrangement sponsored, maintained or
contributed to by and covering employees, former employees, directors or former
directors of the Company (or any of its subsidiaries or any other entity which
would be treated under Section 414 of the Code as a single employer with the
Company) or any of their dependents or beneficiaries, or providing benefits to
such persons in respect of services provided to any such entity, or with respect
to which any such entity is treated as an employer under the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), including, but not limited
to, any employee benefit plans within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA, any
management, employment, deferred compensation, severance (including any payment,
right or benefit resulting from a change in control), bonus or other contract
for personal services with any current or former officer, director or employee,
any consulting contract with any person who prior to entering into such contract
was a director or officer of the Company or
A-13
<PAGE> 107
any of its subsidiaries or any plan, agreement, arrangement or understanding
similar to any of the foregoing (collectively, the "Company Benefit Plans").
Except as set forth in Section 3.10(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, none
of the Company Benefit Plans is a multiemployer plan within the meaning of
ERISA.
(b) Contributions. All contributions and other payments required to have
been made by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (including any pre- or
post-tax contributions or payments by employees or their dependents) to any
Company Benefit Plan (or to any person pursuant to the terms thereof) on or
prior to the date of this Agreement have been so made or the amount of such
payment or contribution obligation has been reflected in the Company Financial
Statements.
(c) Qualification; Compliance. Except as set forth in Section 3.10(c) of
the Company Disclosure Schedule, each of the Company Benefit Plans that is
intended to be "qualified" within the meaning of Code sec. 401(a) has received a
favorable determination letter from the IRS and, to the knowledge of the
Company, no circumstances exist that are reasonably expected by the Company to
result in the revocation of any such determination. Except as set forth in
Section 3.10(c) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company is in compliance
in all material respects with, and each of the Company Benefit Plans is or has
been operated in compliance in all material respects with, any applicable law,
rule or regulation governing such plan, including, without limitation, ERISA and
the Code. For purposes of this Section 3.10(c), the term "Company Benefit Plans"
shall not include multiemployer plans within the meaning of ERISA.
(d) Liabilities. Except as set forth in Section 3.10(d) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, with respect to the Company Benefit Plans, individually and
in the aggregate, no event has occurred, and, to the knowledge of the Company,
there exists no condition or set of circumstances that could subject the Company
or any of its subsidiaries to any liabilities arising under the Code, ERISA or
any other applicable law (including, without limitation, any liability to any
such plan or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC")), or under
any indemnity agreement to which the Company is a party, excluding liability for
benefit claims and funding obligations payable in the ordinary course and
liability for premiums due to the PBGC, which liabilities, individually or in
the aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Effect.
(e) Welfare Plans. Except as set forth in Section 3.10(e) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, none of the Company Benefit Plans that are "Welfare Plans,"
within the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, provides for any retiree benefits,
other than elective continuation required pursuant to Code sec. 4980B or
coverage that expires at the end of the calendar month following termination of
employment.
(f) Documents Made Available. With respect to each Company Benefit Plan
that is not a multiemployer plan within the meaning of ERISA, the Company has
made available to Parent a true and correct copy of (i) such plan and the most
recent summary plan description, (ii) the most recent annual report filed with
the IRS, (iii) each related trust agreement, insurance contract, service
provider or investment management agreement (including all amendments to each
such document), (iv) the most recent determination of the IRS with respect to
the qualified status of such plan and (v) the most recent actuarial report or
valuation. The Company shall make available to Parent as soon as practicable a
true and correct copy of each collective bargaining agreement in which the
Company or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries is a party or under which
the Company has obligations.
A-14
<PAGE> 108
(g) Payments Resulting from Merger. Except as set forth in Section 3.10(g)
of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the consummation, announcement or other
action relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not
(either alone or upon the occurrence of any additional or further acts or
events) result in any (i) payment (whether of severance pay or otherwise)
becoming due from the Company or any of its subsidiaries to any officer,
employee, former employee, director or former director thereof or to the trustee
under any "rabbi trust" or similar arrangement, or (ii) benefit under any
Company Benefit Plan being established or being accelerated, vested or payable.
(h) Funded Status of Plans. Except as set forth in Section 3.10(h) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, the amount equal to the greatest of the projected
benefit obligations, the accumulated benefit obligations or actuarial accrued
liabilities under any Company Benefit Plan that is a "single employer" plan
within the meaning of Section 4001(a)(15) of ERISA did not, as of the date of
the most recent actuarial valuation for such plan, exceed the then fair market
value of the assets of such plan, based on the respective actuarial assumptions
and calculations set forth in such valuation, which actuarial assumptions and
calculations have been provided to Parent prior to the date of this Agreement,
and since the date of such most recent actuarial valuation, there has been no
material adverse change in the funding status of such Company Benefit Plan.
(i) Certain Other Obligations. Except as set forth in Section 3.10(i) of
the Company Disclosure Schedule, the termination of, or withdrawal from, any
employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of sec. 3(2) of ERISA
(including any single employer, multiple employer or multiemployer plan) or
subject to Title IV of ERISA by the Company or any corporation or other entity
that is, or at any time was, a subsidiary of the Company or would be treated
under Section 414 of the Code as single employer with the Company has not, and
will not, subject the Company (or any subsidiary of the Company) to any
liability of or to any governmental authority, corporation or other person or
such employee pension plan that individually or in the aggregate would have a
Company Material Adverse Effect.
(j) Modification or Termination of Plans. Except as may be required by
applicable law, neither the Company nor any subsidiary of the Company is subject
to any legal, contractual, equitable or other obligation to establish or
contribute to as of any date any new Company Benefit Plan or amend any existing
Company Benefit Plan.
(k) Labor Agreements. Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports filed
prior to the date of this Agreement or as set forth in Section 3.7 or Section
3.10(k) of the Company Disclosure Schedule: (i) neither the Company nor any of
its subsidiaries is a party to any collective bargaining agreement or other
labor agreement with any union or labor organization; (ii) to the knowledge of
the Company, there is no current union representation question involving
employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, nor does the Company or any
of its subsidiaries know of any activity or proceeding of any labor organization
or employee group to organize any such employees; (iii) there is no strike,
dispute, slowdown, work stoppage or lockout pending, or to the knowledge of the
Company, threatened, against or involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries
that would reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect; and
(iv) the Company and each of its subsidiaries are in compliance with all
applicable laws respecting employment and employment practices, terms and
conditions of employment, wages, hours of work and occupational safety and
health, except for non-compliance which, in the aggregate, would not reasonably
be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
A-15
<PAGE> 109
SECTION 3.11 Environmental.
(a) Compliance. Each of the Company and its subsidiaries is in compliance
with all applicable Environmental Laws (as hereinafter defined), except where
the failure to be in compliance would not reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries
has received any written communication from any person or Governmental Authority
that alleges that the Company or any of its subsidiaries is not in compliance
with applicable Environmental Laws, except where the failure to be in compliance
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. To
the knowledge of the Company, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries
has used any waste disposal site, or otherwise disposed of, or transported, or
arranged for the transportation of, any Hazardous Materials to any location in
violation of any Environmental Law except where the effect of such violation
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Environmental Permits. Except as set forth in Section 3.4(d) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, each of the Company and its subsidiaries has
obtained or has applied for all environmental, health and safety permits and
authorizations (collectively, the "Environmental Permits") necessary for the
construction of their facilities or the conduct of their operations, and all
such permits are in good standing or, where applicable, a renewal application
has been timely filed and is pending agency approval, and the Company is in
material compliance with all terms and conditions of the Environmental Permits,
in each case except where the failure to obtain or be in compliance with such
Environmental Permit or the requirement to make any expenditure in connection
with such Environmental Permit would not have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Environmental Claims. To the knowledge of the Company, there is no
Environmental Claim (as hereinafter defined) pending (i) against the Company or
any of its subsidiaries or joint ventures, (ii) against any person or entity
whose liability for any Environmental Claim the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or joint ventures has retained or assumed either contractually or
by operation of law or (iii) against any real or personal property or operations
that the Company or any of its subsidiaries or joint ventures owns, leases or
manages, in whole or in part, which, in the case of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii)
would reasonably be expected to have, in the aggregate, a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
(d) Releases. Except as set forth in Section 3.7 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, the Company has no knowledge of any Releases (as hereinafter defined)
of any Hazardous Material (as hereinafter defined) that would reasonably be
expected to form the basis of any Environmental Claims against the Company or
any subsidiaries or joint ventures of the Company, or against any person or
entity whose liability for any Environmental Claim the Company or any
subsidiaries or joint ventures of the Company has retained or assumed either
contractually or by operation of law, except for Releases of Hazardous
Materials, the liability for which would not reasonably be expected to have, in
the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(e) Predecessors. The Company has no knowledge, with respect to any
predecessor of the Company or any subsidiary or joint venture of the Company, of
any Environmental Claim pending or threatened, or of any Release of Hazardous
Materials that would reasonably be expected to form the basis of any
Environmental Claim, that would reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
A-16
<PAGE> 110
(f) Disclosure. The Company has no knowledge of any material facts that the
Company reasonably believes would form the basis of a Company Material Adverse
Effect arising from (i) the cost of pollution control equipment currently
required or known to be required in the future or (ii) current remediation costs
or remediation costs known to be required in the future.
(g) As used in this Agreement:
(i) "Environmental Claim" means any and all written administrative,
regulatory or judicial actions, suits, demands, demand letters, claims,
liens, investigations, proceedings or notices of noncompliance or violation
by any person or entity (including any Governmental Authority) alleging
potential liability (including, without limitation, potential liability for
enforcement, investigatory costs, damages, contribution, indemnification,
cost recovery, compensation, injunctive relief, cleanup costs, governmental
resource costs, removal costs, remedial costs, natural resources damages,
property damages, personal injuries, or penalties) arising out of, based on
or resulting from (A) the presence, or Release or threatened Release into
the environment, of any Hazardous Materials at any location operated,
leased or managed by the Company or any subsidiary or joint venture of the
Company or at any other location to which the Company or any subsidiary or
joint venture of the Company sent, Released, disposed of or transported
Hazardous Materials generated, treated, stored or disposed of by the
Company or any subsidiary or joint venture of the Company; or (B) any
violation of any Environmental Law; or (C) any and all claims by any third
party resulting from the presence or release of any Hazardous Materials.
(ii) "Environmental Laws" means all federal, state, local laws, rules
and regulations relating to pollution or protection of human health or the
environment (including, without limitation, ambient air, surface water,
groundwater, land surface or subsurface strata), including, without
limitation, laws and regulations relating to Releases or threatened
Releases of Hazardous Materials, or otherwise relating to the manufacture,
processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or
handling of Hazardous Materials.
(iii) "Hazardous Materials" means (a) any petroleum or petroleum
products, radioactive materials, asbestos in any form that is or could
become friable, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, and transformers or
other equipment that contain dielectric fluid containing polychlorinated
biphenyls ("PCBs"); and (b) any chemicals, materials or substances which
are now defined as or included in the definition of "hazardous substances,"
"hazardous wastes," "hazardous materials," "extremely hazardous wastes,"
"restricted hazardous wastes," "toxic substances," "toxic pollutants," or
words, of similar import, under any Environmental Law; and (c) any other
chemical, material, substance or waste, exposure to which is now
prohibited, limited or regulated under Environmental Law in a jurisdiction
in which the Company or any subsidiary or joint venture of the Company
operates.
(iv) "Releases" means any release, spill, emission, leaking,
injection, deposit, disposal, discharge, dispersal, leaching or migration
into the atmosphere, soil, surface water, groundwater or property.
SECTION 3.12 Regulation as a Utility. The Company is not subject to the
1935 Act (other than the provisions of Section 9(a)(2) thereof). The Company is
regulated as a public utility in the States of Arizona, California and Nevada
and in no other state.
A-17
<PAGE> 111
Neither the Company nor any "subsidiary company" or "affiliate" (as those terms
are defined in the 1935 Act) of the Company is subject to regulation as a public
utility or public service company (or similar designation) by any other state in
the United States or any foreign country.
SECTION 3.13 Vote Required. At the Company Meeting, the Company will seek
the approval of the First Merger by a majority of the outstanding shares of
Company Common Stock (the "Company Shareholders' Approval"), and no other vote
of the holders of any class or series of the capital stock of the Company is
required to approve this Agreement and the First Merger.
SECTION 3.14 Opinion of Financial Advisor. The Company has received the
opinion of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch"),
to the effect that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be
received by holders of Company Common Stock pursuant to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such
holders.
SECTION 3.15 Brokers. Except for Merrill Lynch, no broker, finder or
investment banker is entitled to any brokerage, finder's or other fee or
commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, that is or will be payable by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. The Company is solely responsible for the fees and expenses of
Merrill Lynch as and to the extent set forth in the engagement letter dated
October 5, 1998. The Company has previously delivered to Parent a complete and
correct copy of such engagement letter.
SECTION 3.16 Insurance. Each of the Company and its subsidiaries is
insured with financially responsible insurers in such amounts and against such
risks and losses as are customary in all material respects for companies
conducting the businesses conducted by the Company and its subsidiaries. Neither
the Company nor its subsidiaries have received any notice of cancellation or
termination with respect to any material insurance policy of the Company or its
subsidiaries. All material insurance policies of the Company and each of its
subsidiaries are valid and enforceable policies in all material respects.
SECTION 3.17 Company Rights Agreement. Prior hereto, the Company has
delivered to Parent and its designated counsel a true and complete copy of the
Company Rights Agreement. The consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement will not result in the triggering of any right or entitlement of
the holders of Company Common Stock or other Company securities under the
Company Rights Agreement or any similar agreement to which the Company or any of
its subsidiaries is a party.
SECTION 3.18 Year 2000. Section 3.18 of the Company Disclosure Schedule
accurately summarizes the current status of the Company's computer applications
and components, compliance plan, communications with suppliers and vendors,
contingency plans and estimated cost of remediation as they relate to the Year
2000 issue. The Company has made available to Parent copies of all
correspondence between the Company and its third party suppliers and vendors
concerning their Year 2000 compliance.
SECTION 3.19 Hedging. Except as set forth in Section 3.19 of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, none of the Company or its subsidiaries engages in any
natural gas or other futures or options trading or is a party to any price
swaps, hedges, futures or similar instruments, except for transactions and
agreements entered into or hedge contracts for the purchase or sale of
hydrocarbons to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party
A-18
<PAGE> 112
that are in accordance with the general practices of other similarly situated
companies in the industry.
SECTION 3.20 Regulatory Proceedings. Other than purchase gas adjustment
provisions, none of the Company or its subsidiaries all or part of whose rates
or services are regulated by a Governmental Authority (a) has rates that have
been or are being collected subject to refund, pending final resolution of any
rate proceeding pending before a Governmental Authority or on appeal to the
courts, or (b) is a party to any rate proceeding before a Governmental Authority
that would reasonably be expected to result in orders having a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
SECTION 3.21 Title to Properties. Except as set forth in Section 3.21 of
the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company and its subsidiaries own, or have a
right to use or a leasehold interest in all real property used by them in the
conduct of their respective businesses as such businesses are now being
conducted. Except as set forth in Section 3.21 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, neither the Company's nor any subsidiaries' ownership of or leasehold
interest in any such property is subject to any mortgage, pledge, lien, option,
conditional sale agreement, encumbrance, security interest, title exception,
reversion or restriction or claim or charge of any kind ("Liens"), except for
such Liens as are not in the aggregate reasonably expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Except as set forth in Section 3.21 of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, all personal property owned by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or used by any of them in the conduct of their respective
businesses is owned free and clear of any Liens, except for such Liens as are
not in the aggregate reasonably expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect. The assets of the Company and its subsidiaries are sufficient to enable
the Company and its subsidiaries to carry on the business of the Company and its
subsidiaries as currently conducted without interference, except to the extent
that such interference would not reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
SECTION 3.22 Condition of Assets. Except as set forth in Section 3.22 of
the Company Disclosure Schedule, to the knowledge of the Company, the buildings,
plant, structures and equipment of the Company and its subsidiaries are in good
working condition and repair and are suitable in all material respects for the
purposes for which they are now being used in the conduct of the business of the
Company and its subsidiaries, except to the extent that such failure would not
reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Parent and Merger Sub represent and warrant to the Company, as of the date
hereof and as of the Closing Date, as follows:
SECTION 4.1 Organization and Qualification. Each of Parent and Merger Sub
and its subsidiaries is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in
good standing under the laws of its state of incorporation and has all requisite
corporate power and authority, and has been authorized by all necessary
approvals and orders to own, lease and operate its assets and properties and to
carry on its business as it is now being conducted.
A-19
<PAGE> 113
SECTION 4.2 Authority; Non-Contravention; Statutory Approvals; Compliance.
(a) Authority. Each of Parent and Merger Sub has all requisite power and
authority to enter into this Agreement and, subject to the applicable Parent
Required Statutory Approvals (as hereinafter defined), if any, to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, the Mergers.
The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation by Parent and
Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by
all necessary corporate action on the part of Parent and Merger Sub. This
Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by each of Parent and
Merger Sub and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by
the Company, constitutes the valid and binding obligation of each of Parent and
Merger Sub, enforceable against them in accordance with its terms, except as may
be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws
relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally and by general principles
of equity.
(b) Non-Contravention. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by each
of Parent and Merger Sub do not, and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby will not, violate, conflict with, or result in a breach of
any provision of, or constitute a default (with or without notice or lapse of
time or both) under, or result in any Violation by Parent or Merger Sub pursuant
to any provisions of (i) the Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws or similar
governing documents of Parent or Merger Sub, (ii) subject to obtaining Parent
Required Statutory Approvals, any statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation,
judgment, decree, order, injunction, writ, permit or license of any Governmental
Authority applicable to Parent or Merger Sub, or any of their respective
properties or assets, or (iii) subject to obtaining the third-party consents or
other approvals set forth in Section 4.2(b) of Parent Disclosure Schedule (as
defined in Section 6.6) ("Parent Required Consents"), any note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, deed of trust, license, franchise, permit, concession, contract,
lease or other instrument, obligation or agreement of any kind to which Parent
or Merger Sub is now a party or by which it or any of its properties or assets
may be bound or affected, excluding from the foregoing clauses (ii) and (iii)
such Violations that would not reasonably be expected to prevent or materially
impair or delay the consummation by Parent or Merger Sub of this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby (any such material adverse effect being
hereinafter referred to as a "Parent Material Adverse Effect").
(c) Statutory Approvals. Except as described in Section 4.2(c) of the
Parent Disclosure Schedule, no declaration, filing or registration with, or
notice to or authorization, consent or approval of, any Governmental Authority
is necessary for the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent or
Merger Sub or the consummation by Parent or Merger Sub of the transactions
contemplated hereby, the failure of which to obtain, make or give would have, in
the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect (the "Parent Required Statutory
Approvals," it being understood that references in this Agreement to "obtaining"
such Parent Required Statutory Approvals shall mean making such declarations,
filings or registrations; giving such notices; obtaining such authorizations,
consents or approvals; and having such waiting periods expire as are necessary
to avoid a violation of law).
SECTION 4.3 Information in Proxy Statement. None of the information
supplied in writing by or on behalf of Parent or Merger Sub specifically for
inclusion in the Proxy Statement will, at the date mailed to the Company's
shareholders, at any time the Proxy Statement is amended or supplemented and at
the time of the Company Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state any material fact required to be
A-20
<PAGE> 114
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the
light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.
SECTION 4.4 No Prior Activities. Except for obligations or liabilities
incurred in connection with its incorporation or organization or the negotiation
and consummation of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby
(including any financing), Merger Sub has not incurred any obligations or
liabilities, and has not engaged in any business or activities of any type or
kind whatsoever or entered into any agreements or arrangements with any Person
or entity.
SECTION 4.5 Brokers. Except for PaineWebber Incorporated, no broker,
finder or investment banker is entitled to any brokerage, finder's or other fee
or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of Parent and Merger Sub, that is
or will be payable by the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Parent and Merger
Sub are solely responsible for the fees and expenses of PaineWebber
Incorporated.
SECTION 4.6 1935 Act. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub is a "holding
company," a "subsidiary company" or an "affiliate" of any public utility company
within the meaning of Section 2(a)(7), 2(a)(8) or 2(a)(11), respectively, of the
1935 Act.
SECTION 4.7 Legal Proceedings. There is (a) no claim, suit, action or
proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened, relating to or
affecting Parent or any of its subsidiaries and (b) no judgment, decree,
injunction or order of any court, governmental department, commission, agency,
instrumentality or authority or any arbitrator applicable to Parent or any of
its subsidiaries that, when taken together with any of the matters described in
clauses (a) or (b), would reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect.
SECTION 4.8 Consulting, Employment and Assumption Agreements. Parent has
entered into a consulting agreement with Michael O. Maffie, an employment
agreement with George C. Biehl and assumption agreements with each of Thomas R.
Sheets, Edward S. Zub, James P. Kane and James F. Lowman, all effective as of
the Effective Time of the First Merger.
SECTION 4.9 Tax Opinion. Parent has been informed by Jones, Day, Reavis &
Pogue, special counsel to Parent, that such firm is willing to deliver an
opinion to the effect that neither the First Merger nor the Second Merger will
be a taxable transaction for federal income tax purposes to either the Company
or Parent.
ARTICLE V
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGERS
SECTION 5.1 Conduct of Business of the Company. After the date hereof and
prior to the Effective Time of the First Merger or earlier termination of this
Agreement, the Company agrees, each as to itself and to each of its
subsidiaries, except as expressly contemplated or permitted in this Agreement
and except as expressly contemplated or permitted in Section 5.1 of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, or to the extent Parent
A-21
<PAGE> 115
otherwise consents in writing (which consent as to matters described in clause
(m) shall not be unreasonably withheld):
(a) Ordinary Course of Business. The Company shall, and shall cause
its subsidiaries to, carry on its and their respective businesses in the
usual, regular and ordinary course in substantially the same manner as
heretofore conducted and use all commercially reasonable efforts to (i)
preserve intact its and their present business organizations and goodwill,
preserve the goodwill and relationships with customers, suppliers and
others having business dealings with them, (ii) subject to prudent
management of workforce needs and ongoing programs currently in force, keep
available the services of its and their present officers and employees as a
group and (iii) maintain and keep material properties and assets in as good
repair and condition as at present, subject to ordinary wear and tear, and
maintain supplies and inventories in quantities consistent with past
practice.
(b) Dividends. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of its
subsidiaries to: (i) declare or pay any dividends on or make other
distributions in respect of any of its or their capital stock other than
(A) dividends by a wholly-owned subsidiary to the Company or another
wholly-owned subsidiary, (B) dividends by a less than wholly-owned
subsidiary consistent with past practice, (C) regular quarterly dividends
on Company Common Stock with usual record and payment dates that do not
exceed the current rate of $0.205 or (D) regular cumulative cash
distributions on Southwest Gas Capital I's 9.125% Trust Originated
Preferred Securities (the "Preferred Securities") not to exceed an annual
rate of 9.125% of the liquidation amount of $25 per Preferred Security;
(ii) split, combine or reclassify any capital stock or the capital stock of
any subsidiary or issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other
securities in respect of, in lieu of, or in substitution for, shares of
capital stock or the capital stock of any subsidiary; or (iii) redeem,
repurchase or otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock or the capital
stock of any subsidiary other than (A) redemptions, repurchases and other
acquisitions of shares of capital stock in connection with the
administration of employee benefit and dividend reinvestment plans as in
effect on the date hereof in the ordinary course of the operation of such
plans consistent with past practice or (B) intercompany acquisitions of
capital stock.
(c) Issuance of Securities. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit
any of its subsidiaries to, issue, agree to issue, deliver, sell, award,
pledge, dispose of or otherwise encumber or authorize or propose the
issuance, delivery, sale, award, pledge, disposal or other encumbrance of,
any shares of its or their capital stock of any class or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for, or any rights, warrants or options to
acquire, any such shares or convertible or exchangeable securities, other
than as provided for in the Company Benefit Plans (including options to be
granted to directors of the Company pursuant to such Company Benefit Plans)
and any dividend reinvestment plans of the Company in effect as of the date
hereof.
(d) Charter Documents. Except as contemplated herein, the Company
shall not, and shall not permit any of its subsidiaries to, amend or
propose to amend its or their respective articles of incorporation, by-laws
or similar governing documents.
(e) Acquisitions. Other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and except for acquisitions by Northern
Pipeline Construction Co. not to exceed an aggregate principal amount of
$15 million annually, the Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of its
subsidiaries to, acquire or agree to acquire, by merging or
A-22
<PAGE> 116
consolidating with, or by purchasing a substantial equity interest in or a
substantial portion of the assets of, or by any other manner, any business
or any corporation, partnership, association or business organization or
division thereof, or otherwise acquire or agree to acquire any material
amount of assets.
(f) Capital Expenditures. Except as required by law, the Company shall
not, nor shall it permit any of its subsidiaries to, make capital
expenditures in excess of $5 million, other than in the ordinary course of
business (not to exceed $230 million annually).
(g) No Dispositions. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of
its subsidiaries to, sell, lease, license, encumber or otherwise dispose
of, any of its assets, other than encumbrances or dispositions in the
ordinary course of its business consistent with past practice.
(h) Indebtedness. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of
its subsidiaries to, incur or guarantee any indebtedness (including any
debt borrowed or guaranteed or otherwise assumed including, without
limitation, the issuance of debt securities or warrants or rights to
acquire debt) or enter into any "keep well" or other agreement to maintain
any financial statement condition of another person or enter into any
arrangement having the economic effect of any of the foregoing other than
(i) short-term indebtedness in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice; (ii) arrangements between the Company and its
subsidiaries or among its subsidiaries; (iii) long-term unsecured
indebtedness ranking pari passu in right of payment with the Company's
current long-term unsecured indebtedness in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $50 million annually and having maturities of five years or less;
(iv) indebtedness incurred in connection with the renewal or replacement of
existing credit support or liquidity support facilities in a principal
amount that does not exceed the principal amount of indebtedness
outstanding under existing credit support or liquidity support facilities
prior to such renewal or replacement; (v) long-term indebtedness in a
principal amount of up to $35 million evidencing the Company's obligations
under industrial development revenue bonds to be issued by Clark County,
Nevada; (vi) equipment financing by Northern Pipeline Construction Co. in
an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15 million annually; or (vii)
in connection with the refunding of existing indebtedness at a lower cost
of funds.
(i) Compensation, Benefits. Except as (i) may be required by
applicable law, (ii) may be required to facilitate or obtain a
determination letter from the IRS that a plan is "qualified" within the
meaning of Section 401(a) of the Code or (iii) specifically required by
this Agreement, the Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of its
subsidiaries to, (A) enter into, adopt or amend or increase the amount or
accelerate the payment or vesting of any benefit or amount payable under,
any employee benefit plan, any bonus plan or arrangement or other contract,
agreement, commitment, arrangement, plan or policy covering employees,
former employees, directors or former directors or their beneficiaries or
providing benefits to such persons, or increase, or enter into any
contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement to increase in any manner,
the compensation or fringe benefits, or otherwise to extend, expand or
enhance the engagement, employment or any related rights of, or take any
other action or grant any benefit (including, without limitation, any stock
options or stock option plan) not required under the terms of any existing
employee benefit plan, any bonus plan or arrangement or other contract,
agreement,
A-23
<PAGE> 117
commitment, arrangement, plan or policy to or with any director, officer or
other employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except for normal
increases or grants or actions in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or (B) enter into or amend any employment,
severance or special pay arrangements with respect to the employment or
termination of employment of any director or officer or other employee.
This subsection (i) is not intended to restrict the Company from granting
promotions to officers or employees based upon job performance or workplace
requirements and is not meant to restrict the Company's ability to make
available to employees the plans, benefits and arrangements that have
customarily and consistent with past practices been available to officers
and employees in the context of such merit-based promotion. It is agreed,
however, that no new officers shall be added to unqualified plans
maintained by the Company. This subsection (i) is also not meant to
restrict the Company from dealing with matters of employee retention in
specific areas of expertise through the use of specialized employment and
benefits plans designed for that specific purpose; provided, however, that,
in the aggregate, the result of the use of such specialized employment or
benefit plans shall not, in the aggregate, result in an annual increase in
compensation in excess of $1 million.
(j) 1935 Act. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of its
subsidiaries to, engage in any activities that would cause a change in its
status, or that of its subsidiaries, under the 1935 Act.
(k) Accounting. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of its
subsidiaries to, make any changes in their accounting methods, except as
required by law, rule, regulation or GAAP.
(l) Affiliate Transactions. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit
any of its subsidiaries to, enter into any material agreement or
arrangement with any other person that, directly or indirectly, controls or
is under common control with or is controlled by the Company, or any of its
respective subsidiaries on terms to the Company or its subsidiaries
materially less favorable than could be reasonably expected to have been
obtained with an unaffiliated third party on an arm's-length basis.
(m) Rate Matters. The Company shall not, and shall cause its
subsidiaries not to, make any filing to change its or its subsidiaries'
utility rates on file with any Governmental Authority, or enter into any
agreement, arrangement or consent to do so, that would reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(n) Tax-Exempt Status. The Company shall not, nor shall it permit any
subsidiary to, take any action that would likely jeopardize the exclusion
from gross income, for purposes of federal income taxation, of the interest
on the outstanding revenue bonds issued for the benefit of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries, which qualify on the date hereof under Code
sec. 142(a) as "exempt facility bonds" or as tax-exempt industrial
development bonds under Section 103(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended prior to the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
(o) Discharge of Liabilities. The Company shall not pay, discharge or
satisfy any material claims, liabilities or obligations (absolute, accrued,
asserted or unasserted, contingent or otherwise), other than the payment,
discharge or satisfaction, in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice (which includes the payment of final and unappealable
judgments) or in accordance with their terms, of liabilities reflected or
reserved against in, or contemplated by, the most
A-24
<PAGE> 118
recent consolidated financial statements (or the notes thereto) of Company
included in the Company SEC Reports, or incurred in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice.
(p) Contracts. The Company shall not, except in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice or as otherwise permitted hereunder
or required in order to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby,
modify, amend, terminate, renew or fail to use reasonable business efforts
to renew any material contract or agreement (including, without limitation,
easements, licenses, permits or other rights) to which the Company or any
of its subsidiaries is a party or waive, release or assign any material
rights or claims.
(q) Insurance. The Company shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries to,
maintain with financially responsible insurance companies insurance in such
amounts and against such risks and losses as are customary for companies
engaged in the gas utility industry.
(r) Permits. The Company shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries to,
use reasonable efforts to maintain in effect or renew all existing material
governmental franchises or permits pursuant to which the Company or its
subsidiaries operate.
(s) Tax Matters. The Company shall not, and shall not permit any of
its subsidiaries to, make or rescind any material express or deemed
election relating to Taxes, settle or compromise any material claim,
action, suit, litigation, proceeding, arbitration, investigation, audit or
controversy relating to Taxes, or change in any material respect any of its
methods of reporting income or deductions for income Tax purposes from
those employed in the preparation of its income Tax Return for the prior
taxable year, except as may be required by applicable law.
SECTION 5.2 No Shopping. (a) The Company shall not, and shall not
authorize or permit any of its officers, directors, agents, financial advisers,
attorneys, accountants or other representatives to, directly or indirectly,
solicit, initiate or encourage submission of proposals or offers from any Person
relating to, or that could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Business
Combination or participate in any negotiations or discussions regarding, or
furnish to any other Person any information with respect to, or otherwise
cooperate in any way with, or assist or participate in, facilitate or encourage,
any effort or attempt by any other Person to do or seek a Business Combination;
provided, however, that, prior to the time at which the Company Shareholders'
Approval has been obtained, the Company may, in response to an unsolicited
written proposal from a third party with respect to a Business Combination that
the Company's Board of Directors determines, in its good faith judgment, after
consultation with and the receipt of the advice of its financial advisor and
outside counsel, is a Superior Proposal, (i) furnish information to, and
negotiate, explore or otherwise engage in substantive discussions with such
third party, only if the Company's Board of Directors determines, in its good
faith judgment after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel, that failing to take such action would create a reasonable possibility
of a breach of the fiduciary duties of the Company's Board of Directors under
applicable law and (ii) take and disclose to the Company's shareholders a
position with respect to another Business Combination proposal, or amend or
withdraw such position, pursuant to Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2 under the Exchange
Act. Prior to furnishing any non-public information to, entering into
negotiations with or accepting a Superior Proposal from such third party, the
Company will (x) provide prompt notice to Parent to the effect that it is
furnishing information to or entering into discussions or
A-25
<PAGE> 119
negotiations with such third party and (y) receive from such third party an
executed confidentiality agreement in reasonably customary form on terms not
materially more favorable to such third party than the terms contained in the
Letter Agreement (as defined in Section 6.1). The Company will immediately cease
and cause to be terminated any existing solicitation, initiation, encouragement,
activity, discussion or negotiations with any parties conducted heretofore by
the Company or any of its representatives with respect to any Business
Combination.
(b) Except as expressly permitted by this Section 5.2(b), neither the
Company's Board of Directors nor any committee thereof may (i) withdraw or
modify, or propose publicly to withdraw or modify, in a manner adverse to Parent
or Merger Sub, the approval or recommendation by the Board of Directors or such
committee of the First Merger or this Agreement, (ii) approve or recommend, or
propose publicly to approve or recommend, a Business Combination or (iii) cause
the Company to enter into any letter of intent, agreement in principle,
acquisition agreement or other similar agreement related to any Business
Combination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to the time at which the
Company Shareholders' Approval has been obtained, in response to an unsolicited
Business Combination proposal from a third party, if the Company's Board of
Directors determines, in its good faith judgment, after consultation with and
the receipt of the advice of its financial advisor and outside counsel, that
such proposal is a Superior Proposal and that failure to do any of the actions
set forth in clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) above would create a reasonable
possibility of a breach of the fiduciary duties of the Company's Board of
Directors under applicable law, the Company's Board of Directors may (x)
withdraw or modify its approval or recommendation of the First Merger or this
Agreement, approve or recommend a Business Combination or cause the Company to
enter into a Business Combination and (y) negotiate with a third party with
respect to such Business Combination proposal and, subject to the Company having
paid to Parent the fees described in Section 8.3(a) and having entered into a
definitive agreement with respect to such Business Combination proposal,
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(e)(iii); provided, however,
that prior to entering into a definitive agreement with respect to a Business
Combination proposal, the Company shall give Parent at least five day's notice
thereof, and shall cause its respective financial and legal advisors to,
negotiate with Parent to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of
this Agreement as would enable the Company to proceed with the transactions
contemplated herein on such adjusted terms; provided, further, that if the
Company and Parent are unable to reach an agreement on such adjustments within
five days after such notice from the Company, the Company may enter into such
definitive agreement, subject to the provisions of Article VIII.
(c) The Company shall notify Parent orally and in writing of any such
inquiries, offers or proposals (including, without limitation, the terms and
conditions of any such offer or proposal and the identity of the Person making
it), within 24 hours of the receipt thereof, shall use all reasonable efforts to
keep Parent informed of the status and details of any such inquiry, offer or
proposal and shall give Parent two day's advance notice of the first delivery of
non-public information to such Person. If any such inquiry, offer or proposal is
in writing, the Company shall promptly deliver to Parent a copy of such inquiry,
offer or proposal.
(d) For purposes of this Agreement, (i) "Business Combination" means (other
than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement) (A) a merger,
consolidation or other business combination, share exchange, sale of shares of
capital stock, tender offer or
A-26
<PAGE> 120
exchange offer or similar transaction involving the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, (B) acquisition in any manner, directly or indirectly, of a
material interest in any voting securities of, or a material equity interest in
a substantial portion of the assets of, the Company or any of its subsidiaries,
including any single or multi-step transaction or series of related transactions
that is structured to permit a third party to acquire beneficial ownership of a
majority or greater equity interest in the Company, or (C) the acquisition in
any manner, directly or indirectly, of any material portion of the business or
assets (other than immaterial or insubstantial assets or inventory in the
ordinary course of business or assets held for sale) of the Company and (ii)
"Superior Proposal" means a proposed Business Combination involving at least 50%
of the shares of capital stock or a material portion of the assets of the
Company that the Company's Board of Directors determines, after consulting with
the Company's financial advisors and outside counsel is financially superior to
the transactions contemplated hereby and it appears that the party making the
proposal is reasonably likely to have the funds necessary to consummate the
Business Combination.
ARTICLE VI
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
SECTION 6.1 Access to Information. Upon reasonable notice and during
normal business hours, the Company shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries to,
afford to the officers, directors, employees, accountants, counsel, investment
bankers, financial advisors and other representatives (collectively,
"Representatives") of Parent reasonable access, throughout the period prior to
the Effective Time of the First Merger, to all of its properties, books,
contracts, commitments and records (including, but not limited to, Tax Returns)
in a manner that will not disrupt the operations of the Company or its
relationship with its customers, suppliers or employees. During such period, the
Company shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries to, furnish promptly to Parent
(i) a copy of each report, schedule and other document filed or received by it
or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to the requirements of federal or state
securities laws or filed with or sent to the SEC, the Department of Justice (the
"DOJ") and the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC"), and any material reports,
schedules or other documents filed with or sent to the California Public
Utilities Commission, the Arizona Corporations Commission, the Public Utilities
Commission of Nevada, the FERC and any other federal or state regulatory agency
or commission, and (ii) all information concerning themselves, their
subsidiaries, directors, officers and shareholders and such other matters as may
be reasonably requested by Parent in connection with any filings, applications
or approvals required or contemplated by this Agreement. Any such investigation
by Parent will not affect the representations or warranties contained in this
Agreement. Parent shall furnish promptly to the Company all information
concerning it, its subsidiaries, directors, officers and shareholders and such
other matters as may be reasonably requested by the Company in connection with
any filings, applications or approvals required or contemplated by this
Agreement. Parent shall from time to time at the request of the Company discuss
its financing arrangements for the Mergers with the Company and shall furnish
promptly to the Company such information concerning its financial condition,
together with the final drafts of its financing arrangements for the Mergers.
Each party shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries and Representatives to, hold
in strict confidence all Evaluation Material (as defined in the Letter
Agreement) concerning the other parties furnished to it in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement in accordance with the Letter
Agreement,
A-27
<PAGE> 121
dated as of November 20, 1998, between the Company and Parent, as it may be
amended from time to time (the "Letter Agreement").
SECTION 6.2 Proxy Statement.
(a) Preparation and Filing. As soon as reasonably practicable after the
date hereof, the Company will prepare and file with the SEC the Proxy Statement.
Each of the parties hereto shall furnish all information concerning itself that
is required or customary for inclusion in the Proxy Statement. The Company shall
use its best efforts to solicit from shareholders of the Company proxies in
favor of the First Merger and shall take all other action necessary or, in the
reasonable opinion of Parent, advisable to secure the Company Shareholders'
Approval. No representation, covenant or agreement is made by or on behalf of
any party hereto with respect to information supplied by any other party for
inclusion in the Proxy Statement. It shall be a condition to the mailing of the
Proxy Statement to the shareholders of the Company that the Company shall have
received an opinion of Merrill Lynch, dated the date of the Proxy Statement, to
the effect that, as of the date thereof, the Merger Consideration to be received
by holders of Company Common Stock pursuant to the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
(b) Amendments and Supplements. The Company shall advise Parent, promptly
after it receives notice thereof, of any request by the SEC for amendment or
supplement of the Proxy Statement or comments thereon and responses thereto or
requests by the SEC for additional information, and the Company shall use all
reasonable efforts to respond promptly to any comments made by the SEC with
respect to the Proxy Statement; provided, however, that the Company shall not
amend or supplement the Proxy Statement with respect to information concerning
Parent or Merger Sub or the description of this Agreement and related agreements
contained therein without the prior approval of Parent.
SECTION 6.3 Regulatory Approvals and Other Matters.
(a) HSR Filings. Each party hereto shall file or cause to be filed with the
FTC and the DOJ any notifications required to be filed under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder with respect to the transactions
contemplated hereby. The parties will use all commercially reasonable efforts to
coordinate such filings and any responses thereto, to make such filings promptly
and to respond promptly to any requests for additional information made by
either of such agencies.
(b) Other Approvals. Each party hereto shall cooperate and use its
commercially reasonable efforts to promptly prepare and file all necessary
documentation, to effect all necessary applications, notices, petitions, filings
and other documents, and to use all commercially reasonable efforts to obtain
all necessary permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all
Governmental Authorities and all other Persons necessary or advisable to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including, without
limitation, the Company Required Statutory Approvals, the Parent Required
Statutory Approvals, the Company Required Consents and the Parent Required
Consents. Each party shall have the right to review and approve in advance (such
approval not to be unreasonably withheld) all Governmental Authority filings or
applications to be made by the other parties in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The
A-28
<PAGE> 122
Company and Parent will consult with each other with respect to the obtaining of
all such necessary permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of
Governmental Authorities.
(c) Financing. Parent shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to
obtain financing for the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
SECTION 6.4 Shareholder Approval.
(a) Company Meeting. Subject to the provisions of Section 6.4(b), the
Company shall, as soon as reasonably practicable after the date hereof (i) take
all steps necessary to duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of
its shareholders (the "Company Meeting") for the purpose of securing the Company
Shareholders' Approval, (ii) distribute to its shareholders the Proxy Statement
in accordance with applicable federal and state law and with its Articles of
Incorporation and By-laws, (iii) subject to the fiduciary duties of its Board of
Directors, recommend to its shareholders the approval of this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby and (iv) cooperate and consult with Parent with
respect to each of the foregoing matters.
(b) Meeting Date. The Company Meeting for the purpose of securing the
Company Shareholders' Approval, including any adjournments thereof, will be held
on such date or dates as the Company and Parent mutually determine.
SECTION 6.5 Directors' and Officers' Indemnification.
(a) Indemnification. Without limiting any existing rights of
indemnification or other agreements or policies, from and after the Effective
Time, the Surviving Corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by
applicable law, indemnify, defend and hold harmless each person who is now, or
has been at any time prior to the date hereof, or who becomes prior to the
Effective Time, an officer or director of Parent or the Company, respectively,
or any of their subsidiaries (each an "Indemnified Party" and collectively, the
"Indemnified Parties") against (i) all losses, expenses (including reasonable
attorneys' fees and expenses), claims, damages or liabilities or, subject to the
proviso of the next succeeding sentence, amounts paid in settlement, arising out
of actions or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time (and whether
asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the Effective Time) that are, in whole
or in part, based on or arising out of the fact that such person is or was a
director or officer of Parent or the Company or any of their subsidiaries (the
"Indemnified Liabilities"), and (ii) all Indemnified Liabilities to the extent
they are based on or arise out of or pertain to the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement. In the event of any such loss, expense, claim, damage or
liability (whether or not arising before the Effective Time), (x) the Surviving
Corporation shall pay the reasonable fees and expenses of counsel selected by
the Indemnified Parties, which counsel will be reasonably satisfactory to Parent
promptly after statements therefor are received and otherwise advance to such
Indemnified Party upon request reimbursement of documented expenses reasonably
incurred, (y) the Surviving Corporation shall cooperate in the defense of any
such matter and (z) any determination required to be made with respect to
whether an Indemnified Party's conduct complies with the standards set forth
under Oklahoma or California law, as applicable, and the articles of
incorporation, by-laws or similar governing documents must be made by
independent counsel mutually acceptable to the Surviving Corporation and the
Indemnified Party; provided, however, that the Surviving Corporation will not be
liable for any settlement effected without its written consent (which consent
shall not be unreasonably withheld). The Indemnified Parties as a group may
retain only one law firm with respect to each related matter except to the
A-29
<PAGE> 123
extent there is, in the opinion of counsel to an Indemnified Party, under
applicable standards of professional conduct, a conflict on any significant
issue between positions of such Indemnified Party and any other Indemnified
Party or Indemnified Parties.
(b) Insurance. For a period of six years after the Effective Time, the
Surviving Corporation shall cause to be maintained in effect policies of
directors' and officers' liability insurance maintained by the Company and
Parent for the benefit of those persons who are covered by such policies as of
the Effective Time on terms no less favorable than the terms of such current
insurance coverage; provided, however, that the Surviving Corporation will not
be required to expend in any year an amount in excess of 200% of the annual
aggregate premiums currently paid by Parent or the Company, as the case may be,
for such insurance; provided, further, that if the annual premiums of such
insurance coverage exceed such amount, the Surviving Corporation will be
obligated to obtain a policy with the best coverage available, in the reasonable
judgment of the board of directors of Parent for a cost not exceeding such
amount.
(c) Successors. In the event the Surviving Corporation or any of its
successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other person and
is not the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation
or merger or (ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties and
assets to any person, then and in either such case, proper provisions must be
made so that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation will assume
the obligations set forth in this Section 6.5.
(d) Survival of Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law,
from and after the Effective Time, all rights to indemnification as of the date
hereof in favor of the employees, agents, directors and officers of Parent or
the Company and their subsidiaries with respect to their activities as such
prior to the Effective Time, as provided in their respective articles of
incorporation, by-laws or similar governing documents in effect on the date
hereof, or otherwise in effect on the date hereof, will survive the Mergers and
will continue in full force and effect for a period of not less than six years
from the Effective Time.
(e) Benefit. The provisions of this Section 6.5 are intended to be for the
benefit of, and are enforceable by, each Indemnified Party, his or her heirs and
his or her representatives.
SECTION 6.6 Disclosure Schedules. On the date hereof, the Company has
delivered to Parent a schedule (the "Company Disclosure Schedule"), accompanied
by a certificate signed by an executive officer of the Company stating the
Company Disclosure Schedule is being delivered pursuant to this Section 6.6 and
Parent has delivered to the Company a schedule (the "Parent Disclosure
Schedule"), accompanied by a certificate signed by an executive officer of
Parent stating the Parent Disclosure Schedule is being delivered pursuant to
this Section 6.6. The Company Disclosure Schedule and the Parent Disclosure
Schedule are collectively referred to herein as the "Disclosure Schedules." The
Disclosure Schedules constitute an integral part of this Agreement and modify
the respective representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of the
parties hereto contained herein to the extent that such representations,
warranties, covenants or agreements expressly refer to the Disclosure Schedules.
Anything to the contrary contained herein or in the Disclosure Schedules
notwithstanding, any and all statements, representations, warranties or
disclosures set forth in the Disclosure Schedules will be deemed to have been
made on and as of the date hereof.
A-30
<PAGE> 124
SECTION 6.7 Public Announcements. Subject to each party's disclosure
obligations imposed by law, (a) the Company and Parent will cooperate with each
other in the development and distribution of all news releases and other public
information disclosures with respect to this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated hereby and (b) may not issue any public announcement
or statement with respect hereto without the consent of the other party (which
consent will not be unreasonably withheld).
SECTION 6.8 Employee Benefit Plans. Except as may be required by
applicable law and except as provided in Section 2.4 with respect to Company
Option Plans and Section 6.9(c) with respect to the Company's Management
Incentive Plan (the "MIP"), each Company Benefit Plan in effect on the date
hereof (or as amended or established in accordance with or as permitted by this
Agreement) shall be maintained in effect with respect to the employees, former
employees, directors or former directors of the Company and any of its
subsidiaries who are covered by such plans or agreements immediately prior to
the Effective Time until Parent determines otherwise on or after the Effective
Time, and Parent shall assume as of the Effective Time each Company Benefit Plan
maintained by the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time and perform
such plan or agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the
Company would be required to perform thereunder; provided, however, that nothing
herein contained, other than the provisions of Section 5.1(i), shall limit any
reserved right contained in any such Company Benefit Plan to amend, modify,
suspend, revoke or terminate any such plan or agreement; provided, further, that
Parent or its subsidiaries shall provide to each employee of the Company and any
of its subsidiaries (other than Northern Pipeline Construction Co.) who was
covered by Company Benefit Plans immediately prior to the Effective Time (i) for
a period of no less than one year following the Effective Time, (A) benefits
under employee benefit plans intended to qualify under Section 401(a) of the
Code (the "Qualified Plans") that are no less favorable in the aggregate than
those provided to the employee immediately prior to the Effective Time under
Company Benefit Plans that are Qualified Plans, (B) benefits under employee
benefit plans that are supplemental retirement benefit and deferred compensation
plans which are not Qualified Plans that are no less favorable in the aggregate
than those provided to the employee immediately prior to the Effective Time
under Company Benefit Plans that are supplemental retirement benefit and
deferred compensation plans which are not Qualified Plans, and (C) employer-
provided benefits under employee benefit plans that are welfare plans that are
no less favorable in the aggregate than those provided to the employee
immediately prior to the Effective Time under Company Benefit Plans that are
welfare plans, and (ii) thereafter, (A) benefits under Qualified Plans that are
no less favorable in the aggregate than those provided from time to time for
similarly situated employees of Parent in Oklahoma under Parent's employee
benefit plans that are Qualified Plans, (B) benefits under employee benefit
plans that are supplemental retirement benefit and deferred compensation plans
which are not Qualified Plans that are no less favorable in the aggregate than
those provided from time to time for similarly situated employees of Parent in
Oklahoma under Parent's employee benefit plans that are supplemental retirement
benefit and deferred compensation plans which are not Qualified Plans and (C)
employer-provided benefits under employee benefit plans that are welfare plans
that are no less favorable in the aggregate than those provided from time to
time for similarly situated employees of Parent in Oklahoma under Parent's
employee benefit plans that are welfare plans. Without limiting the foregoing,
each participant in any Company Benefit Plan who is an employee of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries (other than Northern Pipeline Construction Co.) shall
receive credit for purposes of eligibility to participate, vesting and
eligibility to receive benefits (but specifically excluding for benefit accrual
purposes) under any replacement
A-31
<PAGE> 125
benefit plan of Parent or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates in which such
Person becomes a participant for service credited for the corresponding purpose
under any such Company Benefit Plan; provided, however, that such crediting of
service shall not operate to cause any such plan or agreement to fail to comply
with the applicable provisions of the Code and ERISA. No provision contained in
this Section 6.8 shall be deemed to constitute an employment contract between
Parent or any of its subsidiaries and any individual, or a waiver of Parent's or
any of its subsidiaries' right to discharge any employee at any time, with or
without cause. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Parent acknowledges that
participants in the Company's Supplemental Retirement Plan (the "SERP") shall
continue to accrue benefits after the Effective Time under terms at least as
favorable as the terms of the SERP in effect on the date of this Agreement,
taking into account service compensation earned while employed by Parent and its
subsidiaries after the Effective Time.
SECTION 6.9 Company Stock and Incentive Plans.
(a) 401(k) Plan. With respect to the Company's 401(k) Savings Plan (the
"401(k) Plan"), under which the delivery of Company Common Stock is required
upon payment of benefits, (i) Parent shall take such action as may be necessary
so that, after the Effective Time, the 401(k) Plan provides for the issuance or
purchase in the open market only of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
Parent ("Parent Common Stock") rather than Company Common Stock, and (ii) Parent
shall take all corporate action necessary or appropriate to (A) obtain
shareholder approval with respect to such plan to the extent such approval is
required for purposes of the Code or other applicable law, or to the extent
Parent deems it desirable, (B) reserve for issuance under such plan or otherwise
provide a sufficient number of shares of Parent Common Stock for delivery upon
payment of benefits and (C) as soon as practicable after the Effective Time,
file registration statements on Form S-8 (or any successor or other appropriate
form) with respect to the shares of Parent Common Stock subject to the 401(k)
Plan to the extent such registration statement is required under applicable law,
and Parent shall use its best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such
registration statements (and maintain the current status of the prospectus
contained therein or related thereto) for so long as such benefits remain
payable.
(b) Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The dividend reinvestment plan of the
Company shall terminate as of the Effective Time of the First Merger.
(c) Management Incentive Plan. The Company and Parent shall take all
actions to provide that the MIP shall terminate as of the Effective Time, and
participants in the MIP immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be paid as
soon as practicable after the Effective Time (i) a cash amount equal to a
prorated portion of the then current year's award opportunity earned on the
basis of performance measures applied to the period ending on the Effective
Time, with such proration to be based on the number of days that have elapsed
for the performance year up to and including the Effective Time, (ii) a cash
amount equal to any award earned under the MIP but unpaid as of the Effective
Time for performance years ended prior to the Effective Time and (iii) a cash
amount equal to 100% of the outstanding performance shares awarded and held
under the MIP at the Effective Time in an amount equal to the Merger
Consideration per outstanding performance share. Participants in the MIP for the
performance year in which the Effective Time occurs will participate in the
Parent's annual incentive plan, commencing as of the Effective Time, based on
the terms and conditions thereof, except that any award opportunity will be
earned on the basis of performance measures applied to the portion of
A-32
<PAGE> 126
the Parent's fiscal year occurring after the Effective Time and the amount of
any such award opportunity earned shall be prorated based on the number of days
occurring in the Parent's fiscal year occurring after the Effective Time.
SECTION 6.10 Expenses. Subject to Section 8.3, all costs and expenses
incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby will be paid by the party incurring such expenses.
SECTION 6.11 Advisory Board. Following the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall establish an advisory board of directors consisting of the
current members of the Board of Directors of the Company, other than Messrs.
Maffie and Biehl, to advise the Surviving Corporation regarding issues of
importance to the communities in which the Southwest Division operates, the
employees of the Southwest Division and the Arizona Corporations Commission, the
California Public Utilities Commission and the Public Utilities Commission of
Nevada. The term "Southwest Division" means the operations of the Surviving
Corporation in the states of California, Arizona and Nevada.
SECTION 6.12 Notification. The Company shall (a) advise Parent of any
change or event that has had or, insofar as reasonably can be foreseen, is
reasonably likely to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect and (b)
promptly provide Parent with copies of all filings made by the Company or any of
its subsidiaries with any state or federal court, administrative agency,
commission or other Governmental Authority in connection with this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby. Parent shall (x) advise Company of any
change or event that has had or, insofar as reasonably can be foreseen, is
reasonably likely to result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect, and (y)
promptly provide the Company with copies of all filings made by Parent or Merger
Sub with any state or federal court, administrative agency, commission or other
Governmental Authority in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby.
SECTION 6.13 Las Vegas Office. The Surviving Corporation will establish
the headquarters of the Southwest Division in Las Vegas, Nevada and intends to
maintain such headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada.
SECTION 6.14 Additional Statutory Approvals. Parent agrees not to (a)
become involved in, without agreeing to be a party to, or (b) agree to be a
party to, in either case, any transaction that would make it necessary for
Parent or the Company to make any declaration, filing or registration with, or
notice to or authorization, consent or approval of, any Governmental Authority
in connection with the consummation by Parent, Merger Sub or the Company of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, other than those set forth in
Section 4.2(c) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule or Section 3.4(c) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule (each, an "Additional Statutory Approval"). Parent
shall be in breach of this covenant and agreement only if either party
terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b) as a result of a
transaction contemplated by clause (a) above or the Company terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(c) as a result of a transaction contemplated
by clause (b) above.
SECTION 6.15 Further Assurances. Subject to the terms and conditions
herein provided, each of the parties hereto shall use its commercially
reasonable efforts, taking into account the circumstances and giving due weight
to the materiality of the matter involved or the action required, to take, or
cause to be taken, all action, and to do, or cause to be done, all things
necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws and
A-33
<PAGE> 127
regulations to consummate and make effective the Mergers and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS
SECTION 7.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the
Mergers. The respective obligations of each party to effect the Mergers is
subject to the satisfaction on or prior to the Closing Date of the following
conditions, except, to the extent permitted by applicable law, that such
conditions may be waived in writing pursuant to Section 9.11 by the joint action
of the parties hereto:
(a) Shareholder Approval. The Company Shareholders' Approval shall
have been obtained.
(b) No Challenge. (i) No temporary restraining order or preliminary or
permanent injunction or other order by any federal or state court
preventing consummation of either of the Mergers shall have been issued and
be continuing in effect, (ii) there shall not be instituted or pending by
any Governmental Authority any action or proceeding before any
governmental, regulatory or administrative agency or commission of
competent jurisdiction seeking any injunction, order, decree, judgment or
ruling having the effect set forth in clause (i) above and (iii) the
Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby shall not have been
prohibited under any applicable federal or state law or regulation.
(c) Statutory Approvals. The Company Required Statutory Approvals
(which, for this purpose, shall not include easements, franchises or
similar rights), the Parent Required Statutory Approvals shall have been
obtained at or prior to the Effective Time of the First Merger, and such
approvals shall have become Final Orders (as defined below). A "Final
Order" means action by the relevant regulatory authority which has not been
reversed, stayed, enjoined, set aside, annulled or suspended, with respect
to which any waiting period prescribed by law before the transactions
contemplated hereby may be consummated has expired, and as to which all
conditions to the consummation of such transactions prescribed by law,
regulation or order have been satisfied, and as to which all opportunities
for rehearing, other than at the request of the California Public Utilities
Commission or the Arizona Corporations Commission, are exhausted (whether
or not any appeal is pending).
(d) Dissenter's Rights. Demands for payment of dissenters' rights by
shareholders of the Company with respect to the First Merger shall not
equal or exceed five percent of the outstanding shares of Company Common
Stock entitled to vote thereon.
SECTION 7.2 Conditions to Obligation of Parent to Effect the Mergers. The
obligation of Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Mergers is further subject to
the satisfaction, on or prior to the Closing Date, of the following conditions,
except as may be waived by Parent and Merger Sub in writing pursuant to Section
9.11:
(a) Performance of Obligations of the Company. The Company (or its
appropriate subsidiaries) shall have performed in all material respects its
agreements
A-34
<PAGE> 128
and covenants contained in or contemplated by this Agreement to be
performed by it at or prior to the Effective Time of the First Merger.
(b) Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties
of the Company set forth in this Agreement are true and correct (i) on and
as of the date hereof and (ii) on and as of the Closing Date with the same
effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and
as of the Closing Date (except for representations and warranties that
expressly speak only as of a specific date or time other than the date
hereof or the Closing Date, which need only be true and correct as of such
date or time) except in each of cases (i) and (ii) for such failures of
representations or warranties to be true and correct (without regard to any
materiality qualifications contained therein) that would not be reasonably
likely to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Closing Certificate. Parent and Merger Sub shall have received a
certificate signed by an executive officer of the Company, dated the
Closing Date, to the effect that, to the best of such officer's knowledge,
the conditions set forth in Section 7.2(a) and Section 7.2(b) have been
satisfied.
(d) Company Required Consents. The Company Required Consents
(including, for this purpose, all third party consents or other approvals,
whether or not set forth in Section 3.4(b) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule), the failure of which to obtain would have a Company Material
Adverse Effect, shall have been obtained.
(e) Trigger of Company Rights. No event that would result in the
triggering of any right or entitlement of Company shareholders under the
Company Rights Agreement, including a "flip-in" or "flip-over" or similar
event commonly described in such rights plans shall have occurred, that, in
the reasonable judgment of Parent, would have or would reasonably be
expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect or materially
change the number of outstanding equity securities of the Company, and the
Company Rights shall not have become nonredeemable by any action of the
Company's Board of Directors.
(f) Tax Opinion. Parent shall have received from its counsel an
opinion to the effect that neither the First Merger nor the Second Merger
will be a taxable transaction for federal income tax purposes to either the
Company or Parent; provided, however, that the failure of Jones, Day,
Reavis & Pogue or other counsel reasonably acceptable to Parent to deliver
such an opinion shall not be a condition to Parent's and Merger Sub's
obligations to effect the Merger unless the failure to deliver such opinion
is the result of a change in, or amendment to, the tax laws (or any
regulations thereunder) of the United States or any change in the official
interpretation or application of such tax laws or regulations, which change
or amendment is announced or becomes effective after the date of this
Agreement.
(g) Regulatory Orders. The Final Orders of the California Public
Utilities Commission, the Arizona Corporations Commission, the Public
Utilities Commission of Nevada and the FERC (if required) with respect to
the Mergers and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall not
impose terms or conditions (in addition to existing laws, rules or
regulations), which would have, or would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the business, assets, properties (including
intangible properties), condition (financial or otherwise), results of
operations, prospects or liabilities of the Southwest Division.
A-35
<PAGE> 129
(h) Additional Statutory Approvals. Any Additional Statutory Approvals
shall have been obtained at or prior to the Effective Time, and such
approvals shall become Final Orders.
SECTION 7.3 Conditions to Obligation of the Company to Effect the
Mergers. The obligation of the Company to effect the Mergers is further subject
to the satisfaction, on or prior to the Closing Date, of the following
conditions, except as may be waived by the Company in writing pursuant to
Section 9.11:
(a) Performance of Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. Each of
Parent and Merger Sub (or its appropriate subsidiaries) shall have
performed in all material respects its agreements and covenants contained
in or contemplated by this Agreement to be performed by it at or prior to
the Effective Time of the First Merger.
(b) Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties
of Parent and Merger Sub in Sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8 of this
Agreement are true and correct on and as of the date hereof and on and as
of the Closing Date with the same effect as though such representations and
warranties had been made on and as of the Closing Date, except in each case
for such failures of representations and warranties to be true that would
not be reasonably likely to result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Closing Certificate. The Company shall have received a certificate
signed by an executive officer of Parent, dated the Closing Date, to the
effect that, to the best of such officer's knowledge, the conditions set
forth in Section 7.3(a) and (b) have been satisfied.
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
SECTION 8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers
abandoned at any time prior to the Closing Date, whether before or after
approval by the shareholders of the Company contemplated by this Agreement:
(a) by mutual written consent of the Boards of Directors of the
Company and Parent;
(b) by any party hereto, by written notice to the other parties, if
the Effective Time of the First Merger has not occurred on or before the
first anniversary of the date hereof (the "Initial Termination Date");
provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under this
Section 8.1(b) will not be available to any party that is in material
breach of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
contained herein; and provided, further, that if on the Initial Termination
Date (i) the conditions to the Closing set forth in Section 7.1(c) shall
not have been fulfilled or (ii) any Additional Statutory Approval of the
type described in Section 6.14(a) shall not have been obtained and such
approval shall not have become a Final Order, but all other conditions to
the Closing shall be fulfilled or shall be capable of being fulfilled, then
the Initial Termination Date will be extended to the date that is 18 months
after the date hereof;
A-36
<PAGE> 130
(c) by the Company, by written notice to Parent, at the earlier of (i)
60 days after the time at which all other conditions to the Closing have
been fulfilled or (ii) the date that is 18 months after the date of this
Agreement, if any Additional Statutory Approval of the type described in
Section 6.14(b) shall not have been obtained and such approval shall not
have become a Final Order.
(d) by any party hereto, by written notice to the other parties, if
the Company Shareholders' Approval shall not have been obtained at a duly
held Company Meeting, including any adjournments thereof;
(e) by any party hereto, if any state or federal law, order, rule or
regulation is adopted or issued that has the effect, as supported by the
written opinion of outside counsel for such party, of prohibiting the First
Merger or the Second Merger, or by any party hereto if any court of
competent jurisdiction in the United States or any State shall have issued
an order, judgment or decree permanently restraining, enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting the First Merger or the Second Merger, and such
order, judgment or decree shall have become final and nonappealable;
(f) by the Company, by written notice to Parent, (i) if there exist
breaches of the representations and warranties of Parent made herein as of
the date hereof, which breaches, individually or in the aggregate, would or
would be reasonably likely to result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect,
and such breaches shall not have been remedied within 30 days after receipt
by Parent of notice in writing from the Company, specifying the nature of
such breaches and requesting that they be remedied; (ii) if Parent (or its
appropriate subsidiaries) shall have failed to perform and comply with, in
all material respects, its agreements and covenants hereunder and such
failure to perform or comply shall not have been remedied within 30 days
after receipt by Parent of notice in writing from the Company, specifying
the nature of such failure and requesting that it be remedied; or (iii) in
accordance with Section 5.2(b); provided, however, that the termination
described in this clause (iii) shall not be effective unless and until the
Company shall have paid to Parent the fee described in Section 8.3(a) and
the Company has entered into a definitive agreement with respect to a
Business Combination proposal;
(g) by Parent, by written notice to the Company, if (i) there exist
breaches of the representations and warranties of the Company made herein
as of the date hereof which breaches, individually or in the aggregate,
would or would be reasonably likely to result in a Company Material Adverse
Effect, and such breaches shall not have been remedied within 30 days after
receipt by the Company of notice in writing from Parent, specifying the
nature of such breaches and requesting that they be remedied; (ii) the
Company (or its appropriate subsidiaries) shall have failed to perform and
comply with, in all material respects, its agreements and covenants
hereunder, and such failure to perform or comply shall not have been
remedied within 30 days after receipt by the Company of notice in writing
from Parent, specifying the nature of such failure and requesting that it
be remedied; or (iii) the Board of Directors of the Company or any
committee thereof (A) withdraws or modifies, or proposes publicly to
withdraw or modify, in a manner adverse to Parent or Merger Sub, the
approval or recommendation by the Board of Directors or such committee of
the First Merger or this Agreement, (B) approves or recommends, or proposes
publicly to approve or recommend, a Business Combination, (C) causes the
Company to enter into a definitive agreement related to any Business
Combination or (D) resolves to take any of the actions specified in clause
(A), (B) or (C);
A-37
<PAGE> 131
(h) by the Company, by written notice to Parent, at the earlier of (i)
60 days after the time at which all other conditions to the Closing have
been fulfilled or (ii) the date that is 18 months after the date of this
Agreement, without any liability on the part of either Parent or Merger Sub
or their respective officers or directors, if, notwithstanding Parent's
compliance with its agreement contained in Section 6.3(c), Parent or Merger
Sub is unable to deliver the amount of cash to the Paying Agent required
pursuant to Section 2.2(a) as a direct result of the inability of Parent to
obtain financing for the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
because of the occurrence of significant disruptions in the financial and
capital markets that make it impracticable for a company having financial
characteristics similar to those of Parent as of the date of this Agreement
to finance a transaction of the size and nature of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement; or
(i) by Parent, by written notice to the Company, if a third party,
including a group (as defined under the Exchange Act), acquires securities
representing greater than 50% of the voting power of the outstanding voting
securities of the Company.
SECTION 8.2 Effect of Termination. Subject to Section 9.1 and the proviso
of this Section 8.2, in the event of termination of this Agreement by either the
Company or Parent pursuant to Section 8.1, there will be no liability on the
part of either the Company or Parent or their respective officers or directors
hereunder, except that Sections 6.10, 6.14, 8.3, 9.8 and 9.9 and the agreement
contained in the last sentence of Section 6.1 will survive the termination;
provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve any party from liability
for any breach of this Agreement.
SECTION 8.3 Termination Fee; Expenses.
(a) Termination Fee. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section
8.1(f)(iii), Section 8.1(g)(iii) or Section 8.1(i), then the Company shall pay
to Parent promptly (but not later than five business days after notice is
received from Parent) an amount equal to $30 million in cash.
(b) Expenses. The parties agree that the agreements contained in this
Section 8.3 are an integral part of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and constitute liquidated damages and not a penalty. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained in this Section 8.3, if the Company fails to
promptly pay to Parent any fee due under this Section 8.3, in addition to any
amounts paid or payable pursuant to such Section, the Company, as the defaulting
party, shall pay the costs and expenses (including legal fees and expenses) in
connection with any action, including the filing of any lawsuit or other legal
action, taken to collect payment, together with interest on the amount of any
unpaid fee at the publicly announced prime rate of Bank of America National
Trust and Savings Association from the date such fee was required to be paid.
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 9.1 Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties, Covenants and
Agreements. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in this
Agreement will not survive the Mergers, except the covenants and agreements
contained in this Section 9.1 and in Article II, the last sentence of Section
6.1 and Sections 6.5, 6.8, 6.9, 6.11, 6.13, 9.8 and 9.9, each of which shall
survive in accordance with its terms.
A-38
<PAGE> 132
SECTION 9.2 Notices. All notices and other communications hereunder shall
be in writing and shall be deemed given if (a) delivered personally, (b) sent by
overnight courier service (receipt confirmed in writing), (c) delivered by
facsimile transmission (with receipt confirmed) or (d) five days after being
mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to the parties
at the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be
specified by like notice):
If to Parent, to:
ONEOK, Inc.
100 West Fifth Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
Attention: John A. Gaberino, Jr.
Telephone: (918) 588-7000
Telecopy: (918) 588-7961
with a copy to:
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
77 West Wacker
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Attention: Robert A. Yolles
Telephone: (312) 782-3939
Telecopy: (312) 782-8585
and:
Gable & Gotwals
100 West Fifth Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
Attention: Donald A. Kihle
Telephone: (918) 585-8141
Telecopy: (918) 588-7873
If to Merger Sub, to:
Oasis Acquisition Corporation
100 West Fifth Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
Attention: Deborah B. Barnes
Telephone: (918) 588-7000
Telecopy: (918) 588-7961
with a copy to:
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
77 West Wacker
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Attention: Robert A. Yolles
Telephone: (312) 782-3939
Telecopy: (312) 782-8585
A-39
<PAGE> 133
and:
Gable & Gotwals
100 West Fifth Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
Attention: Donald A. Kihle
Telephone: (918) 585-8141
Telecopy: (918) 588-7873
If to the Company, to:
Southwest Gas Corporation
5241 Spring Mountain Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attention: George C. Biehl
Telephone: (702) 876-7237
Telecopy: (702) 364-8597
with a copy to:
O'Melveny & Myers LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attention: Frances E. Lossing
Telephone: (213) 430-6000
Telecopy: (213) 430-6407
SECTION 9.3 Certain Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement (unless
otherwise provided herein), the term:
(a) "affiliate" of a Person means a Person that directly or
indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by,
or is under common control with, the first mentioned Person;
(b) "control" (including the terms "controlled by" and "under common
control with") means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to
direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a Person,
whether through the ownership of stock, as trustee or executor, by contract
or credit arrangement or otherwise; and
(c) "Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, limited
liability company, association, trust or any unincorporated organization.
SECTION 9.4 Miscellaneous. This Agreement (including the documents and
instruments referred to herein) (a) constitutes the entire agreement and
supersedes all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
among the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof
other than the Letter Agreement; (b) may not be assigned by operation of law or
otherwise; and (c) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Oklahoma applicable to contracts executed in and to be
fully performed in such State, without giving effect to its conflicts of law,
rules or principles.
A-40
<PAGE> 134
SECTION 9.5 Interpretation. When a reference is made in this Agreement to
Sections or Exhibits, such reference shall be to a Section or Exhibit of this
Agreement, respectively, unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents and
headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall
not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever
the words, "include," "includes," or "including" are used in this Agreement,
they shall be deemed to be followed by the words "without limitation."
SECTION 9.6 Counterparts; Effect. This Agreement may be executed in one or
more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of
which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
SECTION 9.7 Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure solely to the benefit of each party hereto, and, except for (a) rights of
Indemnified Parties as set forth in Section 6.5 and (b) as set forth in Section
6.8, 6.9 and 6.11, nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to
confer upon any persons, any rights or remedies of any nature whatsoever under
or by reason of this Agreement.
SECTION 9.8 Waiver of Jury Trial and Certain Damages. Each party to this
Agreement waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, (a) any
right it may have to a trial by jury in respect of any action, suit or
proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement and (b) without
limitation to Section 8.3, any right it may have to receive damages from any
other party based on any theory of liability for any special indirect,
consequential (including lost profits) or punitive damages.
SECTION 9.9 Enforcement. The parties agree that irreparable damage would
occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It
is accordingly agreed that the parties are entitled to an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement, this being in addition to any other
remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.
SECTION 9.10 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties
hereto by written agreement executed and delivered by duly authorized officers
of the respective parties, at any time before or after the Company Shareholders'
Approval has been obtained the Company and prior to the Effective Time of the
First Merger, but after such shareholder approval, no such amendment may (a)
alter or change the rights or any of the proceedings of the treatment of shares
under Article II, or (b) alter or change any of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement if any of the alterations or changes, alone or in the aggregate, would
materially adversely affect the rights of holders of Company capital stock,
except for alterations or changes that could otherwise be adopted by the Board
of Directors of the Company, without the further approval of such shareholders.
SECTION 9.11 Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time of the First
Merger, the parties hereto may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of
the obligations or other acts of the other parties hereto, (b) waive any
inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any
document delivered pursuant hereto and (c) waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions contained herein, to the extent permitted by applicable
law. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such extension or waiver
will be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of
such party. The failure of any party to this Agreement to assert any of its
rights hereunder or otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of such rights.
A-41
<PAGE> 135
SECTION 9.12 No Remedy in Certain Circumstances. Each party agrees that,
should any court or other competent authority hold any provision of this
Agreement or part to be null, void or unenforceable, or order any party to take
any action inconsistent herewith or not to take an action consistent herewith or
required hereby, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining
provision and obligations contained or set forth herein shall not in any way be
affected or impaired thereby, unless the foregoing inconsistent action or the
failure to take an action constitutes a material breach of this Agreement or
makes this agreement impossible to perform, in which case this Agreement shall
be terminated pursuant to Article VIII hereof. Except as otherwise contemplated
by this Agreement, to the extent that a party hereto took any action
inconsistent herewith or failed to take action consistent herewith or required
hereby pursuant to an order or judgment of a court or other competent authority,
such party shall not incur any liability or obligation unless such party
breached its obligations under Section 6.3(a) or (b) did not in good faith seek
to resist or object to the imposition or entering of such order or judgment.
SECTION 9.13 Further Assurances. Each party will execute such further
documents and instruments and take such further actions as may reasonably be
requested by any other party in order to consummate the Mergers in accordance
with the terms hereof.
A-42
<PAGE> 136
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have caused this
Agreement to be signed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as
of the date first written above.
ONEOK, INC.
By: /s/ LARRY W. BRUMMETT
-----------------------------------
Name: Larry W. Brummett
Title: Chairman and CEO
By: /s/ DEBORAH B. BARNES
-----------------------------------
Name: Deborah B. Barnes
Title: Secretary
OASIS ACQUISITION CORPORATION
By: /s/ LARRY W. BRUMMETT
-----------------------------------
Name: Larry W. Brummett
Title: Chairman and CEO
By: /s/ DEBORAH B. BARNES
-----------------------------------
Name: Deborah B. Barnes
Title: Secretary
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
By: /s/ MICHAEL O. MAFFIE
-----------------------------------
Name: Michael O. Maffie
Title: President and CEO
By: /s/ GEORGE C. BIEHL
-----------------------------------
Name: George C. Biehl
Title: Secretary
A-43
<PAGE> 137
ANNEX A
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of the corporation is: Southwest Gas Corporation.
ARTICLE II
PURPOSE
The purpose of the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity
for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of
California other than the banking business, the trust company business or the
practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California
Corporations Code.
ARTICLE III
AGENT FOR SERVICE
The name in the State of California of this corporation's agent for service
of process is:
Corporation Service Company which will do business in California as CSC-
Lawyer's Incorporating Service.
ARTICLE IV
AUTHORIZED SHARES
This corporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares of stock;
and the total number of shares which this corporation is authorized to issue is
1,000 shares designated as Common Stock.
ARTICLE V
LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS/INDEMNIFICATION
(a) The liability of the directors of the Corporation for monetary damages
shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law.
(b) The Corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of agents (as
defined in Section 317 of the California Corporations Code) through Bylaw
provisions, agreements with agents, vote of shareholders or disinterested
directors, or otherwise, to the fullest extent permissible under California law.
(c) Any amendment, repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of
this Article V shall not adversely affect any right or protection of an agent of
the Corporation existing at the time of such amendment, repeal or modification.
A-44
<PAGE> 138
ANNEX B
BYLAWS
OF
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
(A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION)
A-45
<PAGE> 139
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ARTICLE I
OFFICES
Section 1. Principal Executive Office.................... A-48
Section 2. Other Offices................................. A-48
ARTICLE II
SHAREHOLDERS
Section 1. Place of Meetings............................. A-48
Section 2. Annual Meetings............................... A-48
Section 3. Special Meetings.............................. A-48
Section 4. Notice of Annual or Special Meetings.......... A-48
Section 5. Quorum........................................ A-49
Section 6. Adjourned Meetings and Notice Thereof......... A-49
Section 7. Voting........................................ A-49
Section 8. Record Date................................... A-50
Section 9. Consent of Absentees.......................... A-50
Section 10. Action Without Meeting........................ A-51
Section 11. Proxies....................................... A-51
Section 12. Inspectors of Election........................ A-51
ARTICLE III
DIRECTORS
Section 1. Powers........................................ A-51
Section 2. Committees.................................... A-51
Section 3. Number of Directors........................... A-52
Section 4. Election and Term of Office................... A-52
Section 5. Vacancies..................................... A-52
Section 6. Resignation................................... A-53
Section 7. Place of Meetings............................. A-53
Section 8. Annual Meetings............................... A-53
Section 9. Special Meetings.............................. A-53
Section 10. Quorum........................................ A-53
Section 11. Participation in Meetings by Conference
Telephone..................................... A-53
Section 12. Waiver of Notice.............................. A-54
Section 13. Adjournment................................... A-54
Section 14. Fees and Compensation......................... A-54
Section 15. Action Without Meeting........................ A-54
ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
Section 1. Officers...................................... A-54
Section 2. Election...................................... A-54
Section 3. Subordinate Officers.......................... A-54
</TABLE>
A-46
<PAGE> 140
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Section 4. Removal and Resignation....................... A-54
Section 5. Vacancies..................................... A-54
Section 6. President..................................... A-55
Section 7. Vice Presidents............................... A-55
Section 8. Secretary..................................... A-55
Section 9. Chief Financial Officer....................... A-55
Section 10. Chairman of the Board......................... A-56
ARTICLE V
OTHER PROVISIONS
Section 1. Inspection of Corporate Records............... A-56
Section 2. Inspection of Bylaws.......................... A-56
Section 3. Endorsement of Documents; Contracts........... A-56
Section 4. Certificates of Stock......................... A-56
Section 5. Representation of Shares of Other
Corporations.................................. A-57
Section 6. Annual Report to Shareholders................. A-57
Section 7. Construction and Definitions.................. A-57
Section 8. Compensation.................................. A-57
Section 9. Indemnification of Agents of the Corporation;
Purchase of Liability Insurance............... A-57
Section 10. Corporate Loans and Guarantees to Directors
and Officers.................................. A-58
ARTICLE VI
AMENDMENTS
</TABLE>
A-47
<PAGE> 141
BYLAWS
FOR THE REGULATION, EXCEPT AS
OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY STATUTE OR ITS
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION,
OF
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
(A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION)
ARTICLE I
OFFICES
SECTION 1. Principal Executive Office. The principal executive office of
the Corporation shall be fixed and located at such place as the Board of
Directors (herein referred to as the "Board") shall determine. The Board is
granted full power and authority to change said principal executive office from
one location to another.
SECTION 2. Other Offices. Branch or subordinate offices may be established
at any time by the Board at any place or places.
ARTICLE II
SHAREHOLDERS
SECTION 1. Place of Meetings. Meetings of shareholders shall be held at the
principal executive office of the Corporation unless another place within or
without the State of California is designated by the Board.
SECTION 2. Annual Meetings. The annual meeting of shareholders shall be
held on January 21st of each year, commencing in 2000, or such other date or
such other time as may be fixed by the Board, provided, however, that should
said day fall upon a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday observed by the
Corporation at its principal executive office, then any such annual meeting of
shareholders shall be held at the same time and place on the next day thereafter
ensuing which is a business day. At such meeting, directors shall be elected and
any other proper business may be transacted.
SECTION 3. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the shareholders may be
called at any time by the Board, the Chairman of the Board, the President or by
the holders of shares entitled to cast not less than ten percent of the votes at
such meeting.
SECTION 4. Notice of Annual or Special Meetings. Written notice of each
annual or special meeting of shareholders shall be given not less than 10 nor
more than 60 days before the date of the meeting to each shareholder entitled to
vote thereat.
Such notice shall be given either personally or by first-class mail,
postage prepaid, or by other means of written communication, addressed to the
shareholder at the address of such shareholder appearing on the books of the
Corporation or given by the shareholder to the Corporation for the purpose of
notice, or if no such address appears or is given, at the place where the
principal executive office of the Corporation is located or by publication at
least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the
principal executive office is located. After notice is given by mail, the
Secretary or the Assistant
A-48
<PAGE> 142
Secretary, if any, or transfer agent, shall execute an affidavit of mailing in
accordance with this section.
The notice shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting and (i) in
the case of a special meeting, the general nature of the business to be
transacted, and no other business may be transacted, or (ii) in the case of the
annual meeting, those matters which the Board, at the time of the mailing of the
notice, intends to present for action by the shareholders, but, subject to the
provisions of applicable law, any proper matter may be presented at the meeting
for such action. The notice of any meeting at which directors are to be elected
shall include the names of nominees intended at the time of notice to be
presented by the Board for election.
SECTION 5. Quorum. A majority of the shares entitled to vote, represented
in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at any meeting of the
shareholders. Subject to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation
(herein referred to as the "Articles of Incorporation"), the shareholders
present at a duly called or held meeting at which a quorum is present may
continue to do business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of
enough shareholders to leave less than a quorum, if any action taken (other than
adjournment) is approved by at least a majority of the shares required to
constitute a quorum.
SECTION 6. Adjourned Meetings and Notice Thereof. Any meeting of
shareholders, whether or not a quorum is present, may be adjourned from time to
time by the vote of a majority of the shares, the holders of which are either
present in person or represented by proxy thereat, but in the absence of a
quorum (except as provided in Section 5 of this Article) no other business may
be transacted at such meeting.
It shall not be necessary to give any notice of the time and place of the
adjourned meeting or of the business to be transacted thereat, other than by
announcement at the meeting at which such adjournment is taken; provided,
however, when any shareholders' meeting is adjourned for more than 45 days or,
if after adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting,
notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given as in the case of an original
meeting.
SECTION 7. Voting. The shareholders entitled to notice of any meeting or to
vote at any such meeting shall be only those persons in whose names shares are
registered in the stock records of the Corporation on the record date determined
in accordance with Section 8 of this Article.
Except as provided below and except as may be otherwise provided in the
Articles of Incorporation, each outstanding share shall be entitled to one vote
on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders. Subject to the requirements
of the next sentence, every shareholder entitled to vote at any election of
directors may cumulate such shareholder's votes and give one candidate a number
of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number
of votes to which such shareholder's shares are nominally entitled, or
distribute the shareholder's votes on the same principle among as many
candidates as the shareholder thinks fit. No shareholder shall be entitled to
cumulate votes (i.e., cast for any candidate a number of votes greater than the
number of votes which such shareholder normally is entitled to cast) unless such
candidate or candidates' names have been placed in nomination prior to the
voting and any shareholder has given notice at the meeting prior to the voting
of such shareholder's intention to cumulate the shareholder's votes.
A-49
<PAGE> 143
Any holder of shares entitled to vote on any matter may vote part of the
shares in favor of the proposal and refrain from voting the remaining shares or
vote them against the proposal, other than elections to office, but, if the
shareholder fails to specify the number of shares such shareholder is voting
affirmatively, it will be conclusively presumed that the shareholder's approving
vote is with respect to all shares such shareholder is entitled to vote.
Elections for directors need not be by ballot unless a shareholder demands
election by ballot at the meeting and before the voting begins.
Provided that the quorum requirements of Section 5 above are satisfied: the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and voting at a duly
held meeting at which a quorum is present (which shares voting affirmatively
also constitute at least a majority of the required quorum) shall be the act of
the shareholders, unless the vote of a greater number or voting by classes is
required by the California General Corporation Law or the Articles of
Incorporation, provided that whenever under the California General Corporation
Law shares are disqualified from voting on any matter, they shall not be
considered outstanding for purposes of the determination of a quorum at any
meeting to act upon, or the required vote to approve action upon any matter; and
in any election of directors, the candidates receiving the highest number of
affirmative votes of the shares entitled to be voted for them, up to the number
of directors to be elected by such shares, are elected; votes against the
director and votes withheld shall have no legal effect.
SECTION 8. Record Date. The Board may fix, in advance, a record date for
the determination of the shareholders entitled to notice of, or to vote at, any
meeting of the shareholders, or the shareholders entitled to receive payment of
any dividend or other distribution, or any allotment of rights, or to exercise
rights in respect of any other lawful action. The record date so fixed shall be
not more than 60 days nor less than 10 days prior to the date of the meeting nor
more than 60 days prior to any other action.
If no record date is fixed by the Board, (i) the record date for
determining shareholders entitled to notice of, or to vote at, a meeting of
shareholders shall be at the close of business on the business day next
preceding the day on which notice is given or, if notice is waived, at the close
of business on the business day next preceding the day on which the meeting is
held, and (ii) the record date for determining shareholders entitled to give
consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, when no prior action
by the Board has been taken, shall be the day on which the first written consent
is given.
A determination of shareholders of record entitled to notice of, or to vote
at, a meeting of shareholders shall apply to any adjournment of the meeting
unless the Board fixes a new record date for the adjourned meeting. The Board
shall fix a new record date if the meeting is adjourned for more than 45 days
from the date set for the original meeting.
SECTION 9. Consent of Absentees. The transactions of any meeting of
shareholders, however called and noticed, and wherever held, are as valid as
though had at a meeting duly held after regular call and notice, if a quorum is
present either in person or by proxy, and if, either before or after the
meeting, each of the persons entitled to vote, not present in person or by
proxy, signs a written waiver of notice, or a consent to the holding of the
meeting, or an approval of the minutes thereof. All such waivers, consents or
approvals shall be filed with the corporate records or made a part of the
minutes of the meeting. Neither the business to be transacted at nor the purpose
of any annual or special meeting
A-50
<PAGE> 144
of shareholders, need be specified in any written waiver of notice, except as
provided in the California General Corporation Law.
SECTION 10. Action Without Meeting. Subject to Section 603 of the
California General Corporation Law, any action which, under any provision of the
California General Corporation Law, may be taken at any annual or special
meeting of shareholders, may be taken without a meeting and without prior notice
if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by
the holders of outstanding shares having not less than the minimum number of
votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at
which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.
SECTION 11. Proxies. Every person entitled to vote shares shall have the
right to do so either in person or by one or more persons authorized by a valid
written proxy signed by such person or such person's attorney in fact and filed
with the Secretary. Subject to the provisions of this bylaw and applicable law,
any duly executed proxy continues in full force and effect until revoked by the
person executing it prior to the vote pursuant thereto.
SECTION 12. Inspectors of Election. Prior to any meeting of shareholders,
the Board may appoint inspectors of election to act at the meeting or any
adjournment thereof. If inspectors of election are not so appointed, or if any
persons so appointed fail to appear or refuse to act, the chairman of the
meeting may, and on the request of any shareholder or his proxy shall, appoint
inspectors of election or persons to replace those who fail to appear or refuse
to act at the meeting. The number of inspectors shall be either one or three. If
appointed at a meeting on the request of one or more shareholders or proxies,
the holders of a majority of shares or their proxies present at the meeting
shall determine whether one or three inspectors are to be appointed. The
inspectors of election shall (i) determine the number of shares outstanding and
the voting power of each, the shares represented at the meeting, the existence
of a quorum and the authenticity, validity and effect of proxies, (ii) receive
votes, ballots or consents, (iii) hear and determine all challenges and
questions in any way arising in connection with the right to vote, (iv) count
and tabulate all votes or consents, (v) determine when the poll shall close and
the election result and (vi) do any other acts that may be proper to conduct the
election or vote with fairness to all shareholders.
The inspectors of election shall perform their duties impartially, in good
faith, to the best of their ability and as expeditiously as it is practicable.
If there are three inspectors of election, the decision, act or certificate of
majority is effective in all respects as the decision, act or certificate of
all.
ARTICLE III
DIRECTORS
SECTION 1. Powers. Subject to limitations of the Articles of Incorporation,
these Bylaws and the California General Corporation Law relating to actions
required to be approved by the shareholders or by the outstanding shares, the
business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed and all corporate
powers shall be exercised by or under the direction of the Board.
SECTION 2. Committees. The Board may, by resolution adopted by a majority
of the authorized number of directors, designate one or more committees, each
consisting of two or more directors, to serve at the pleasure of the Board. The
Board may designate one or
A-51
<PAGE> 145
more directors as alternate members of any committee, who may replace any absent
member of the committee. The appointment of members or alternate members of a
committee requires the vote of a majority of the authorized number of directors.
Any such committee, to the extent provided in the resolution of the Board, shall
have all the authority of the Board, except with respect to (i) the approval of
any action required to be approved by the shareholders or by the outstanding
shares under the California General Corporation Law, (ii) the filling of
vacancies on the Board or in any committee, (iii) the fixing of compensation of
the directors for serving on the Board or on any committee, (iv) the adoption,
amendment or repeal of Bylaws, (v) the amendment or repeal of any resolution of
the Board which by its express terms is not so amendable or repealable, (vi) a
distribution to the shareholders, except at a rate or in a periodic amount or
within a price range determined by the Board and (vii) the appointment of other
committees of the Board or the members thereof.
SECTION 3. Number of Directors. The number of directors shall not be less
than one nor more than three until changed by amendment of the Articles of
Incorporation or by a Bylaw amending this Section 3 duly adopted by the vote or
written consent of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote, provided that a proposal to reduce the fixed number or the minimum number
of directors below five may not be adopted if the votes cast against its
adoption at a meeting or the shares not consenting in the case of an action by
written consent, are equal to more than sixteen and two-thirds percent (16 2/3%)
of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. The exact number of directors shall
be fixed from time to time, within the limitations specified in the Articles of
Incorporation or in this Section 3, by a Bylaw or amendment thereof duly adopted
by the vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote represented at a duly
held meeting at which a quorum is present, or by written consent of the holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, or by the Board.
Subject to the foregoing provisions for changing the number of directors, the
number of directors of the Corporation has been fixed at three. However, any
reduction of the authorized number of directors does not remove any director
prior to the expiration of such director's term of office.
SECTION 4. Election and Term of Office. The directors shall be elected at
each annual meeting of the shareholders, but if any such annual meeting is not
held or the directors are not elected thereat, the directors may be elected at
any special meeting of shareholders held for that purpose. Subject to Section 5
of this Article, each director shall hold office until the next annual meeting
and until a successor has been elected and qualified.
SECTION 5. Vacancies. A vacancy or vacancies in the Board shall be deemed
to exist in case of the death, resignation or removal of any director, if the
authorized number of directors be increased or if the shareholders fail at any
annual or special meeting of shareholders at which any directors are elected, to
elect the full authorized number of directors to be voted at that meeting.
Vacancies in the Board, except those existing as a result of a removal of a
director, may be filled by a majority of the remaining directors, or, if the
number of remaining directors is less than a quorum, by (i) the unanimous
written consent of the remaining directors, (ii) the affirmative vote of a
majority of the remaining directors at a meeting held pursuant to notice or
waivers of notice complying with Section 307 of the California General
Corporation Law, or (iii) by a sole remaining director, and each director so
elected shall hold office until the next annual meeting and until such
director's successor has been elected and qualified.
A-52
<PAGE> 146
Vacancies in the Board created by the removal of a director may be filled
only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and voting
at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present (which shares voting
affirmatively also constitute at least a majority of the required quorum) or by
the unanimous written consent of all shares entitled to vote for the election of
directors.
The shareholders may elect a director or directors at any time to fill any
vacancy or vacancies not filled by the directors. Any such election by written
consent other than to fill a vacancy created by removal requires the consent of
a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.
SECTION 6. Resignation. Any director may resign effective upon giving
written notice to the President, the Secretary or the Board, unless the notice
specifies a later time for the effectiveness of such resignation. If the
resignation is effective at a future time, a successor may be elected to take
office when the resignation becomes effective.
SECTION 7. Place of Meetings. Regular or special meetings of the Board
shall be held at any place within or without the State of California which has
been designated in the notice of the meeting or, if not stated therein, as
designated by resolution of the Board. In the absence of such designation,
meetings shall be held at the principal executive office of the Corporation.
SECTION 8. Annual Meetings. Immediately following each annual meeting of
shareholders, the Board may, but shall not be required to, hold an annual
meeting at the same place, or at any other place that has been designated by the
Board, for the purpose of organization, election of officers or transaction of
other business as the Board may determine. Call and notice of this meeting of
the Board shall be in the manner for the conduct of special meetings as provided
in Section 9 unless the Board has determined by resolution to conduct a regular
meeting at such time and place, in which event call and notice of this meeting
of the Board shall not be required unless some place other than the place of the
annual shareholders' meeting has been designated.
SECTION 9. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board for any purpose
or purposes may be called at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the
President, the Secretary or by any two directors upon four days' notice by mail
or 48 hours' notice given personally or by telephone, telegraph, telex or other
similar means of communication. Any such notice shall be addressed or delivered
to each director at such director's address as it is shown upon the records of
the Corporation or as may have been given to the Corporation by the director for
purposes of notice.
SECTION 10. Quorum. A majority of the authorized number of directors
constitutes a quorum of the Board for the transaction of business, except to
adjourn as hereinafter provided. Every act or decision done or made by a
majority of the directors present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is
present shall be regarded as the act of the Board, unless a greater number be
required by law or by the Articles. A meeting at which a quorum is initially
present may continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of
directors, if any action taken is approved by at least a majority of the
required quorum for such meeting.
SECTION 11. Participation in Meetings by Conference Telephone. Members of
the Board may participate in a meeting through use of conference telephone or
similar communications equipment, so long as all members participating in such
meeting can hear one another.
A-53
<PAGE> 147
SECTION 12. Waiver of Notice. Notice of a meeting need not be given to any
director who signs a waiver of notice or a consent to holding the meeting or an
approval of the minutes thereof, whether before or after the meeting, or who
attends the meeting without protesting, prior thereto or at its commencement,
the lack of notice to such director. All such waivers, consents or approvals
shall be filed with the corporate records or made a part of the minutes of the
meeting.
SECTION 13. Adjournment. A majority of the directors present, whether or
not a quorum is present, may adjourn any directors' meeting to another time and
place. If a meeting is adjourned for more than 24 hours, notice of any
adjournment to another time or place shall be given prior to the time of the
adjourned meeting to the directors that were not present at the time of
adjournment.
SECTION 14. Fees and Compensation. Directors and members of committees may
receive such compensation, if any, for their services, and such reimbursement
for expenses, as may be fixed or determined by the Board.
SECTION 15. Action Without Meeting. Any action required or permitted to be
taken by the Board may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board
shall individually or collectively consent in writing to such action. Such
written consent or consents shall be filed with the minutes of the proceedings
of the Board. Such action by written consent shall have the same effect as a
unanimous vote of the members of the Board.
ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
SECTION 1. Officers. The officers of the Corporation shall be a President,
a Secretary and a Chief Financial Officer. The Corporation may also have, at the
discretion of the Board, a Chairman, one or more Vice Presidents, one or more
Assistant Secretaries, one or more Assistant Financial Officers and such other
officers as may be elected or appointed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 3 of this Article.
SECTION 2. Election. The officers of the Corporation, except such officers
as may be elected or appointed in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 or
Section 5 of this Article, shall be chosen by, and shall serve at the pleasure
of, the Board, and shall hold their respective offices until their resignation,
removal or other disqualification from service, or until their respective
successors shall be elected and qualified.
SECTION 3. Subordinate Officers. The Board may elect, and may empower the
President to appoint, such other officers as the business of the Corporation may
require, each of whom shall hold office for such period, have such authority and
perform such duties as are provided in these Bylaws or as the Board may from
time to time determine.
SECTION 4. Removal and Resignation. Any officer may be removed, either with
or without cause, by the Board at any time. Any officer may resign at any time
upon written notice to the Corporation without prejudice to the rights, if any,
of the Corporation under any contract to which the officer is a party.
SECTION 5. Vacancies. A vacancy in any office because of death,
resignation, removal, disqualification or any other cause shall be filled in the
manner prescribed in these Bylaws for regular election or appointment to such
office.
A-54
<PAGE> 148
SECTION 6. President. The President is the general manager and chief
executive officer of the Corporation and has, subject to the control of the
Board, general supervision, direction and control of the business and officers
of the Corporation. The President shall preside at all meetings of the
shareholders and at all meetings of the Board. The President has the general
powers and duties of management usually vested in the office of president and
general manager of a corporation and such other powers and duties as may be
prescribed by the Board.
SECTION 7. Vice Presidents. In the absence or disability of the President,
unless a Chairman has been elected, the Vice Presidents in order of their rank
as fixed by the Board or, if not ranked, the Vice President designated by the
Board, shall perform all the duties of the President and, when so acting, shall
have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the
President. The Vice Presidents shall have such other powers and perform such
other duties as from time to time may be prescribed for them respectively by the
Board.
SECTION 8. Secretary. The Secretary shall keep or cause to be kept, at the
principal executive office and such other place as the Board may order, a book
of minutes of all meetings of shareholders and the Board, with the time and
place of holding, whether regular or special, and if special, how authorized,
the notice thereof given, the names of those present or represented at meetings
of shareholders, and the proceedings thereof. The Secretary shall keep, or cause
to be kept, a copy of the Bylaws of the Corporation at the principal executive
office or business office in accordance with Section 213 of the California
General Corporation Law.
The Secretary shall keep, or cause to be kept, at the principal executive
office or at the office of the Corporation's transfer agent or registrar, if one
be appointed, a share register, or a duplicate share register, showing the names
of the shareholders and their addresses, the number and classes of shares held
by each, the number and date of certificates issued for the same, and the number
and date of cancellation of every certificate surrendered for cancellation.
The Secretary shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of
the shareholders and of the Board required by these Bylaws or by law to be
given, shall keep the seal of the Corporation in safe custody, and shall have
such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the
Board.
SECTION 9. Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer shall keep
and maintain, or cause to be kept and maintained, adequate and correct accounts
of the properties and business transactions of the Corporation, and shall send
or cause to be sent to the shareholders of the Corporation such financial
statements and reports as are by law or these Bylaws required to be sent to
them. The books of account shall at all times be open to inspection by any
director.
The Chief Financial Officer shall deposit all moneys and other valuables in
the name and to the credit of the Corporation with such depositories as may be
designated by the Board. The Chief Financial Officer shall disburse the funds of
the Corporation as may be ordered by the Board, shall render to the President
and directors, upon their request, an account of all transactions as Chief
Financial Officer and of the financial condition of the Corporation, and shall
have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the
Board.
A-55
<PAGE> 149
SECTION 10. Chairman of the Board. If such an officer be elected, the
Chairman of the Board shall preside at meetings of the board of directors and
exercise and perform such other powers and duties as may be from time to time
assigned to him by the board of directors or prescribed by the Bylaws. In the
absence of the President, or if there is no President, the Chairman of the Board
shall, in addition, be the chief executive officer of the Corporation and shall
have the powers and duties described in Section 6 above.
ARTICLE V
OTHER PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. Inspection of Corporate Records. The record of shareholders
shall be open to inspection and copying, and the accounting books and records
and minutes of proceedings of the shareholders and the Board and committees of
the Board, if any, shall be open to inspection, upon written demand on the
Corporation of any shareholder at any reasonable time during usual business
hours, for a purpose reasonably related to such holder's interests as a
shareholder.
SECTION 2. Inspection of Bylaws. The Corporation shall keep at its
principal executive office in the State of California, or if its principal
executive office is not in California, at its principal business office in
California, the original or a copy of these Bylaws as amended to date, which
shall be open to inspection by the shareholders at all reasonable times during
office hours. If the principal executive office of the Corporation is outside
California and the Corporation has no principal business office in California,
it shall upon the written request of any shareholder furnish to such shareholder
a copy of these Bylaws as amended to date.
SECTION 3. Endorsement of Documents; Contracts. Subject to the provisions
of applicable law, any note, mortgage, evidence of indebtedness, contract, share
certificate, initial transaction statement or written statement, conveyance or
other instrument in writing and any assignment or endorsement thereof executed
or entered into between the Corporation and any other person shall be valid and
binding on the Corporation, when signed by the Chairman, the President or any
Vice President and the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, the Chief Financial
Officer or any Assistant Financial Officer of the Corporation unless the other
party knew that the signing officers had no authority to execute the same. Any
such instruments may be signed by any other person or persons and in such manner
as from time to time shall be determined by the Board, and, unless so authorized
by the Board, no officer, agent or employee shall have any power or authority to
bind the Corporation by any contract or engagement or to pledge its credit or to
render it liable for any purpose or amount.
SECTION 4. Certificates of Stock. Every holder of shares of the Corporation
shall be entitled to have a certificate signed in the name of the Corporation by
the President or a Vice President and by the Chief Financial Officer or an
Assistant Financial Officer or the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary,
certifying the number of shares and the class or series of shares owned by the
shareholder. Any or all of the signatures on the certificate may be facsimile.
Except as provided in this Section, no new certificate for shares shall be
issued in lieu of an old one unless the latter is surrendered and cancelled at
the same time. The Board may, however, if any certificate for shares is alleged
to have been lost, stolen or destroyed, authorize the issuance of a new
certificate in lieu thereof, and the Corporation may require
A-56
<PAGE> 150
that the Corporation be given a bond or other adequate security sufficient to
indemnify it against any claim that may be made against it (including expense or
liability) on account of the alleged loss, theft or destruction of such
certificate or the issuance of such new certificate.
SECTION 5. Representation of Shares of Other Corporations. The President or
any other officer or officers authorized by the Board or by the President are
each authorized to vote, represent and exercise on behalf of the Corporation all
rights incident to any and all shares of any other corporation or corporations
standing in the name of the Corporation. The authority herein granted may be
exercised either by any such officer in person or by any other person authorized
so to do by proxy or power of attorney duly executed by said officer.
SECTION 6. Annual Report to Shareholders. The requirement of sending an
annual report to shareholders which is set forth in the California General
Corporation Law is expressly waived, but nothing herein shall be interpreted as
prohibiting the Board from issuing annual or other periodic reports to
shareholders.
Notwithstanding the immediately preceding paragraph, if the Corporation has
100 or more holders of record of its shares (determined as provided in the
California General Corporation Law), the Board shall cause an annual report to
be sent to the shareholders not later than 120 days after the close of the
fiscal year. Such report, in addition to such information as may be required by
the California General Corporation Law, shall contain a balance sheet as of the
end of that fiscal year and an income statement and statement of changes in
financial position for that fiscal year, accompanied by any report thereon of
independent accountants or, if there is no such report, the certificate of an
authorized officer of the Corporation that the statements were prepared without
audit from the books and records of the Corporation. The requirement of sending
such report to the shareholders at least 15 (or, if sent by third-class mail,
35) days prior to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held during the next
fiscal year is expressly waived.
SECTION 7. Construction and Definitions. Unless the context otherwise
requires, the general provisions, rules of construction and definitions
contained in the General Provisions of the California Corporations Code and in
the California General Corporation Law shall govern the construction of these
Bylaws.
SECTION 8. Compensation. The salaries of all officers and agents of the
Corporation shall be fixed by the Board.
SECTION 9. Indemnification of Agents of the Corporation; Purchase of
Liability Insurance. For purposes of this Section 9, "agent" means any person
who is or was a director, officer, employee or other agent of the Corporation,
or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of a foreign or domestic corporation which was a predecessor corporation
of the Corporation or of another enterprise at the request of such predecessor
corporation; "proceeding" means any threatened, pending or completed action or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative; and
"expenses" includes without limitation, attorneys' fees and any expenses of
establishing a right to indemnification under this Section 9.
The Corporation shall have the power to indemnify any person who was or is
a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding (other than an
action by or in the
A-57
<PAGE> 151
right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor) by reason of the
fact that such person is or was an agent of the Corporation, against expenses,
judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred
in connection with such proceeding to the fullest extent permitted under the
General Corporation Law of the State of California, as amended from time to
time.
SECTION 10. Corporate Loans and Guarantees to Directors and Officers. The
Corporation shall not make any loan of money or property to, or guarantee the
obligation of, any director or officer of the Corporation or of its parent, if
any, unless the transaction, or an employee benefit plan authorizing the loans
or guarantees after disclosure of the right under such a plan to include
officers or directors, is approved by a majority of the shareholders entitled to
act thereon.
The Corporation shall not make any loan of money or property to, or
guarantee the obligation of, any person upon the security of shares of the
Corporation or of its parent, if any, if the Corporation's recourse in the event
of default is limited to the security for the loan or guaranty, unless the loan
or guaranty is adequately secured without considering these shares, or the loan
or guaranty is approved by a majority of the shareholders entitled to act
thereon.
Notwithstanding the first paragraph of this Section 10, the Corporation may
advance money to a director or officer of the Corporation or of its parent, if
any, for any expenses reasonably anticipated to be incurred in the performance
of the duties of the director or officer, provided that in the absence of the
advance the director or officer would be entitled to be reimbursed for the
expenses by the Corporation, its parent, or subsidiary, if any.
The provisions of the first paragraph of this Section 10 do not apply to
the payment of premiums in whole or in part by the Corporation on a life
insurance policy on the life of a director or officer so long as repayment to
the Corporation of the amount paid by it is secured by the proceeds of the
policy and its cash surrender value.
The provisions of this Section 10 do not apply to any transaction, plan or
agreement permitted under Section 408 of the California General Corporation Law
relating to employee stock purchase plans.
For the purposes of this Section, "approval by a majority of the
shareholders entitled to act" means either (1) written consent of a majority of
the outstanding shares without counting as outstanding or as consenting any
shares owned by any officer or director eligible to participate in the plan or
transaction that is subject to this approval, (2) the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares present and voting at a duly held meeting at which a
quorum is otherwise present, without counting for purposes of the vote as either
present or voting any shares owned by any officer or director eligible to
participate in the plan or transaction that is subject to the approval, or (3)
the unanimous vote or written consent of the shareholders.
ARTICLE VI
AMENDMENTS
These Bylaws may be amended or repealed either by approval of the
outstanding shares (as defined in Section 152 of the California General
Corporation Law) or by the approval of the Board; provided, however, that after
the issuance of shares, a Bylaw
A-58
<PAGE> 152
specifying or changing a fixed number of directors or the maximum or minimum
number or changing from a fixed to a variable number of directors or vice versa
may be adopted only by approval of the outstanding shares.
A-59
<PAGE> 153
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AMENDMENT NO. 1 ("Amendment No. 1"), dated as of April 25, 1999, to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), dated as of December 14,
1998, by and among ONEOK, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation ("Parent"), Oasis
Acquisition Corporation, a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Southwest Gas Corporation, a California
corporation (the "Company").
WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have previously executed and
delivered the Merger Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company desire to amend the Merger
Agreement as set forth herein and pursuant to Section 9.10 thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company agree as follows:
1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not expressly defined herein
shall have the meanings accorded such terms in the Merger Agreement.
2. Amendment of Section 2.1(a) of the Merger Agreement. The first sentence
of Section 2.1(a) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated to
read, in its entirety, as follows:
"Each issued and outstanding share of Company Common Stock (other than
Dissenting Shares (as defined in Section 2.3) covered by Section 2.3) and
each associated stock purchase right (the "Company Rights") issued pursuant
to the Rights Agreement, dated as of March 5, 1996, as amended, between the
Company and Harris Trust Company, as Rights Agent (the "Company Rights
Agreement"), which will be terminated at the Effective Time of the First
Merger (references herein to Company Common Stock or Shares will be deemed
to include the associated Company Rights), will be converted into the right
to receive $30.00 per share in cash, payable to the holder thereof, without
interest (the "Merger Consideration"), upon surrender of the certificate
formerly representing such share of Company Common Stock in the manner
provided in Section 2.2."
All references to the Merger Consideration in the Merger Agreement or in any
other instrument or agreement contemplated thereby shall be deemed to refer to
the Merger Consideration as such term is defined in the amended and restated
first sentence of Section 2.1(a) set forth above.
3. Amendment of Section 5.1 of the Merger Agreement. Section 5.1 of the
Merger Agreement is hereby amended to add the following new Section 5.1(t):
"(t) Southern Union Confidentiality Agreement. The Company shall take
such actions as shall be necessary and appropriate to enforce all of its
rights, powers and remedies under the Confidentiality Agreement, dated
February 21, 1999 (the "Southern Union Confidentiality Agreement"), between
the Company and Southern Union Company, a Delaware corporation, without
amendment or waiver thereof and shall not agree to any amendment or waiver
of or supplement to any provision of the Confidentiality Agreement."
A-60
<PAGE> 154
4. Amendment of Section 5.2(b) of the Merger Agreement. Clause (y) of
Section 5.2(b) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read,
in its entirety, as follows
"(y) negotiate with a third party with respect to such Business
Combination proposal and, subject to the Company having paid to Parent the
fees described in Section 8.3(a) and having entered into a definitive
agreement with respect to such Business Combination proposal, terminate
this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(f)(iii)"
5. Amendment of Section 6.1 of the Merger Agreement. Section 6.1 of the
Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read, in its entirety, as
follows:
"SECTION 6.1 Access to Information. Except as otherwise stated in this
Section 6.1, upon reasonable notice and during normal business hours, the
Company shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries to, afford to the officers,
directors, employees, accountants, counsel, investment bankers, financial
advisors and other representatives (collectively, "Representatives") of
Parent reasonable access, throughout the period prior to the Effective Time
of the First Merger, to all of its properties, books, contracts,
commitments and records (including, but not limited to, Tax Returns) in a
manner that will not disrupt the operations of the Company or its
relationship with its customers, suppliers or employees. During such
period, the Company shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries to, furnish
promptly to Parent (i) a copy of each report, schedule and other document
filed or received by it or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to the
requirements of federal or state securities laws or filed with or sent to
the SEC, the Department of Justice (the "DOJ") and the Federal Trade
Commission (the "FTC"), and any material reports, schedules or other
documents filed with or sent to the California Public Utilities Commission,
the Arizona Corporations Commission, the Public Utilities Commission of
Nevada, the FERC and any other federal or state regulatory agency or
commission, and (ii) all information concerning themselves, their
subsidiaries, directors, officers and shareholders and such other matters
as may be reasonably requested by Parent in connection with any filings,
applications or approvals required or contemplated by this Agreement. Any
such investigation by Parent will not affect the representations or
warranties contained in this Agreement. Parent shall furnish promptly to
the Company all information concerning it, its subsidiaries, directors,
officers and shareholders and such other matters as may be reasonably
requested by the Company in connection with any filings, applications or
approvals required or contemplated by this Agreement. Parent shall from
time to time at the request of the Company discuss its financing
arrangements for the First Merger with the Company and shall furnish
promptly to the Company such information concerning its financial
condition, together with the final drafts of its financing arrangements for
the First Merger. Parent shall promptly advise the Company of any reduction
in the rating of Parent's long-term unsecured debt securities by Moody's
Investors Services, Inc. or Standard & Poor's Ratings Group.
Notwithstanding anything in this Section 6.1 to the contrary, except as
required by law (including, but not limited to, a valid and effective
subpoena, order, civil investigative demand or similar process issued by a
court of competent jurisdiction or by a federal, state or local, foreign or
domestic Governmental Authority), the Company shall not be obligated to
provide books, records or documents that the Company is legally or by
contract obligated to keep confidential. Each party shall, and shall cause
its subsidiaries and Representatives to, hold in strict confidence all
Evaluation Material
A-61
<PAGE> 155
(as defined in the Letter Agreement) concerning the other parties furnished
to it in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in
accordance with the Letter Agreement, dated as of November 20, 1998,
between the Company and Parent, as it may be amended from time to time (the
"Letter Agreement")."
6. Amendment of Section 6.2(a) of the Merger Agreement. The first sentence
of Section 6.2(a) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated to
read, in its entirety, as follows
"On or prior to May 14, 1999, the Company will prepare and file with
the SEC the Proxy Statement."
7. Amendment of Section 6.3 of the Merger Agreement. A new subsection (d)
shall be added to Section 6.3 of the Merger Agreement that reads as follows:
"(d) Ratings. Parent shall cause its long-term unsecured debt
securities to be rated at least Baa3 by Moody's Investors Services, Inc.
and at least BBB- by Standard & Poor's Ratings Group immediately prior to
the Effective Time of the First Merger."
8. Amendment of Section 9.4 of the Merger Agreement. Section 9.4 of the
Merger Agreement is hereby amended to add the following phrase after the word
"principles" in clause (c) thereof:
"except to the extent that certain matters regarding the Mergers are
governed as a matter of California law by the laws of the State of
California."
9. Authority.
(a) Each of Parent and Merger Sub has all requisite corporate power and
authority to enter into this Amendment No. 1. The execution and delivery of this
Amendment No. 1 and the consummation by each of Parent and Merger Sub of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, as amended hereby, have been
duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of Parent and
Merger Sub, including, without limitation, the due approval of this Amendment
No. 1 by the Boards of Directors of Parent and Merger Sub. This Amendment No. 1
has been duly executed and delivered by each of Parent and Merger Sub and,
assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by the Company,
constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of each of Parent and Merger
Sub, enforceable against each of Parent and Merger Sub in accordance with its
terms.
(b) The Company has all requisite corporate power and authority to enter
into this Amendment No. 1. The execution and delivery of this Amendment No. 1
and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement, as amended hereby, has been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of the Company, including, without limitation, the
due approval of this Amendment No. 1 by the Board of Directors of the Company.
This Amendment No. 1 has been duly executed and delivered by the Company, and
assuming due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by each of Parent and
Merger Sub, constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company,
enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms.
10. Governing Law. This Amendment No. 1 shall be governed by, and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Oklahoma applicable to contracts
executed in and to be fully performed in such State, without giving effect to
its conflicts of law, rules or
A-62
<PAGE> 156
principles except to the extent that certain matters regarding the Mergers are
governed as a matter of California law by the laws of the State of California.
11. Counterparts; Effect. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in one or
more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of
which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
12. Merger Agreement Confirmed. Except as amended hereby, the Merger
Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects. Each reference in the
Merger Agreement or any other related document to the Merger Agreement or this
Amendment No. 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Merger Agreement as
amended hereby.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
A-63
<PAGE> 157
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have caused this
Amendment No. 1 to be signed by their respective officers thereunto duly
authorized as of the date first written above.
ONEOK, INC.
By: /s/ LARRY W. BRUMMETT
-----------------------------------
Name: Larry W. Brummett
Title: Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ DEBORAH B. BARNES
-----------------------------------
Name: Deborah B. Barnes
Title: Corporate Secretary
OASIS ACQUISITION CORPORATION
By: /s/ LARRY W. BRUMMETT
-----------------------------------
Name: Larry W. Brummett
Title: Chairman of the Board
By: /s/ DEBORAH B. BARNES
-----------------------------------
Name: Deborah B. Barnes
Title: Corporate Secretary
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
By: /s/ MICHAEL O. MAFFIE
-----------------------------------
Name: Michael O. Maffie
Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer
By: /s/ GEORGE C. BIEHL
-----------------------------------
Name: George C. Biehl
Title: Secretary
A-64
<PAGE> 158
APPENDIX B
Investment Banking
Corporate and Institutional
Client Group
World Financial Center
North Tower
New York, New York 10281-1330
(LOGO) 212 449 1000
June 30, 1999
Board of Directors
Southwest Gas Corporation
5241 Spring Mountain Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-8510
Members of the Board of Directors:
Southwest Gas Corporation (the "Company"), ONEOK, INC. (the "Acquiror") and
Oasis Acquisition Corporation, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of the
Acquiror (the "Acquisition Sub"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of December 14, 1998, as amended (the "Agreement") pursuant to
which Acquisition Sub will be merged with the Company in a merger (the "Merger")
in which each share of the Company's common stock, par value $1.00 per share
(the "Company Shares"), will be converted into the right to receive $30.00 per
share in cash (the "Consideration").
You have asked us whether, in our opinion, the Consideration to be received
by the holders of the Company Shares pursuant to the Merger is fair from a
financial point of view to such holders.
In arriving at the opinion set forth below, we have, among other things:
(1) Reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to the Company that we deemed to be relevant;
(2) Reviewed certain information, including financial forecasts,
relating to the business, earnings, cash flow, assets, liabilities
and prospects of the Company furnished to us by the Company;
(3) Conducted discussions with members of senior management and
representatives of the Company concerning the matters described in
clauses 1 and 2 above;
(4) Reviewed the market prices and valuation multiples for the Company
Shares and compared them with those of certain publicly traded
companies that we deemed to be relevant;
(5) Reviewed the results of operations of the Company and compared them
with those of certain publicly traded companies that we deemed to be
relevant;
(6) Compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that we deemed to be
relevant;
B-1
<PAGE> 159
(7) Participated in certain discussions and negotiations among
representatives of the Company and the Acquiror and their financial
and legal advisors;
(8) Reviewed the Agreement; and
(9) Reviewed such other financial studies and analyses and took into
account such other matters as we deemed necessary, including our
assessment of general economic, market and monetary conditions.
In preparing our opinion, we have assumed and relied on the accuracy and
completeness of all information supplied or otherwise made available to us,
discussed with or reviewed by or for us, or publicly available, and we have not
assumed any responsibility for independently verifying such information or
undertaken an independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or
liabilities of the Company or been furnished with any such evaluation or
appraisal. In addition, we have not assumed any obligation to conduct any
physical inspection of the properties or facilities of the Company. With respect
to the financial forecast information furnished to or discussed with us by the
Company, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared and reflect the
best currently available estimates and judgment of the Company's management as
to the expected future financial performance of the Company.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic and other conditions
as they exist and can be evaluated on, and on the information made available to
us as of, the date hereof.
In connection with the preparation of this opinion, we have not been
authorized by the Company or the Board of Directors to solicit, nor have we
solicited, third-party indications of interest for the acquisition of all or any
part of the Company.
As you are aware, Southern Union Company has proposed a transaction to
acquire all of the outstanding Company Shares for $33.50 per share, which we
understand the Board of Directors has unanimously rejected.
We are acting as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the
Merger and will receive a fee from the Company for our services, portions of
which are payable upon execution of the Agreement and approval of the Merger by
the holders of the Company Shares, and a significant portion of which is
contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. In addition, the Company has
agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of our engagement. We
have, in the past, provided financial advisory and financing services to the
Company, including acting as lead underwriter in connection with an offering of
the Company's common stock in July 1998, and may continue to do so, and have
received, and may receive, fees for the rendering of such services. In addition,
in the ordinary course of our business, we may actively trade the Company Shares
and other securities of the Company, as well as securities of the Acquiror for
our own account and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any
time hold a long or short position in such securities.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board of Directors of the
Company. Our opinion does not address the merits of the underlying decision by
the Company to engage in the Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to
any shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote on the proposed Merger or
any matter related thereto.
B-2
<PAGE> 160
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be received by the holders of the
Company Shares pursuant to the Merger is fair from a financial point of view to
the holders of such shares.
Very truly yours,
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH
INCORPORATED
B-3
<PAGE> 161
APPENDIX C
CHAPTER 13 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE
CHAPTER 13. DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
SECTION
1300. Reorganization or short-form merger; dissenting shares; corporate purchase
at fair market value; definitions.
1301. Notice to holders of dissenting shares in reorganizations; demand for
purchase; time; contents.
1302. Submission of share certificates for endorsement; uncertificated
securities.
1303. Payment of agreed price with interest; agreement fixing fair market value;
filing; time of payment.
1304. Action to determine whether shares are dissenting shares or fair market
value; limitation; joinder; consolidation; determination of issues;
appointment of appraisers.
1305. Report of appraisers; confirmation; determination by court; judgment;
payment; appeal; costs.
1306. Prevention of immediate payment; status as creditors; interest.
1307. Dividends on dissenting shares.
1308. Rights of dissenting shareholders pending valuation; withdrawal of demand
for payment.
1309. Termination of dissenting share and shareholder status.
1310. Suspension of right to compensation or valuation proceedings; litigation
of shareholders' approval.
1311. Exempt shares.
1312. Right of dissenting shareholder to attack, set aside or rescind merger or
reorganization; restraining order or injunction; conditions.
SEC. 1300. REORGANIZATION OR SHORT-FORM MERGER; DISSENTING SHARES; CORPORATE
PURCHASE AT FAIR MARKET VALUE; DEFINITIONS
(a) If the approval of the outstanding shares (Section 152) of a
corporation is required for a reorganization under subdivisions (a) and (b) or
subdivision (e) or (f) of Section 1201, each shareholder of the corporation
entitled to vote on the transaction and each shareholder of a subsidiary
corporation in a short-form merger may, by complying with this chapter, require
the corporation in which the shareholder holds shares to purchase for cash at
their fair market value the shares owned by the shareholder which are dissenting
shares as defined in subdivision (b). The fair market value shall be determined
as of the day before the first announcement of the terms of the proposed
reorganization or short-form merger, excluding any appreciation or depreciation
in consequence of the
C-1
<PAGE> 162
proposed action, but adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split, or share
dividend which becomes effective thereafter.
(b) As used in this chapter, "dissenting shares" means shares which come
within all of the following descriptions
(1) Which were not immediately prior to the reorganization or
short-form merger either (A) listed on any national securities exchange
certified by the Commissioner of Corporations under subdivision (o) of
Section 25100 or (B) listed on the list of OTC margin stocks issued by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the notice of meeting
of shareholders to act upon the reorganization summarizes this section and
Sections 1301, 1302, 1303 and 1304; provided, however, that this provision
does not apply to any shares with respect to which there exists any
restriction on transfer imposed by the corporation or by any law or
regulation; and provided, further, that this provision does not apply to
any class of shares described in subparagraph (A) or (B) if demands for
payment are filed with respect to 5 percent or more of the outstanding
shares of that class.
(2) Which were outstanding on the date for the determination of
shareholders entitled to vote on the reorganization and (A) were not voted
in favor of the reorganization or, (B) if described in subparagraph (A) or
(B) of paragraph (1) (without regard to the provisos in that paragraph),
were voted against the reorganization, or which were held of record on the
effective date of a short-form merger; provided, however, that subparagraph
(A) rather than subparagraph (B) of this paragraph applies in any case
where the approval required by Section 1201 is sought by written consent
rather than at a meeting.
(3) Which the dissenting shareholder has demanded that the corporation
purchase at their fair market value, in accordance with Section 1301.
(4) Which the dissenting shareholder has submitted for endorsement, in
accordance with Section 1302.
(c) As used in this chapter, "dissenting shareholder" means the
recordholder of dissenting shares and includes a transferee of record.
SEC. 1301. NOTICE TO HOLDERS OF DISSENTING SHARES IN REORGANIZATIONS; DEMAND FOR
PURCHASE; TIME; CONTENTS
(a) If, in the case of a reorganization, any shareholders of a corporation
have a right under Section 1300, subject to compliance with paragraphs (3) and
(4) of subdivision (b) thereof, to require the corporation to purchase their
shares for cash, such corporation shall mail to each such shareholder a notice
of the approval of the reorganization by its outstanding shares (Section 152)
within 10 days after the date of such approval, accompanied by a copy of
Sections 1300, 1302, 1303, 1304 and this section, a statement of the price
determined by the corporation to represent the fair market value of the
dissenting shares, and a brief description of the procedure to be followed if
the shareholder desires to exercise the shareholder's right under such sections.
The statement of price constitutes an offer by the corporation to purchase at
the price stated any dissenting shares as defined in subdivision (b) of Section
1300, unless they lose their status as dissenting shares under Section 1309.
C-2
<PAGE> 163
(b) Any shareholder who has a right to require the corporation to purchase
the shareholder's shares for cash under Section 1300, subject to compliance with
paragraphs (3) and (4) of subdivision (b) thereof, and who desires the
corporation to purchase such shares shall make written demand upon the
corporation for the purchase of such shares and payment to the shareholder in
cash of their fair market value. The demand is not effective for any purpose
unless it is received by the corporation or any transfer agent thereof (1) in
the case of shares described in clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (1) of
subdivision (b) of Section 1300 (without regard to the provisos in that
paragraph), not later than the date of the shareholders' meeting to vote upon
the reorganization, or (2) in any other case within 30 days after the date on
which the notice of the approval by the outstanding shares pursuant to
subdivision (a) or the notice pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was
mailed to the shareholder.
(c) The demand shall state the number and class of the shares held of
record by the shareholder which the shareholder demands that the corporation
purchase and shall contain a statement of what such shareholder claims to be the
fair market value of those shares as of the day before the announcement of the
proposed reorganization or short-form merger. The statement of fair market value
constitutes an offer by the shareholder to sell the shares at such price.
SEC. 1302. SUBMISSION OF SHARE CERTIFICATES FOR ENDORSEMENT; UNCERTIFICATED
SECURITIES
Within 30 days after the date on which notice of the approval by the
outstanding shares or the notice pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was
mailed to the shareholder, the shareholder shall submit to the corporation at
its principal office or at the office of any transfer agent thereof, (a) if the
shares are certificated securities, the shareholder's certificates representing
any shares which the shareholder demands that the corporation purchase, to be
stamped or endorsed with a statement that the shares are dissenting shares or to
be exchanged for certificates of appropriate denomination so stamped or endorsed
or (b) if the shares are uncertificated securities, written notice of the number
of shares which the shareholder demands that the corporation purchase. Upon
subsequent transfers of the dissenting shares on the books of the corporation,
the new certificates, initial transaction statement, and other written
statements issued therefor shall bear a like statement, together with the name
of the original dissenting holder of the shares.
SEC. 1303. PAYMENT OF AGREED PRICE WITH INTEREST; AGREEMENT FIXING FAIR MARKET
VALUE; FILING; TIME OF PAYMENT
(a) If the corporation and the shareholder agree that the shares are
dissenting shares and agree upon the price of the shares, the dissenting
shareholder is entitled to the agreed price with interest thereon at the legal
rate on judgments from the date of the agreement. Any agreements fixing the fair
market value of any dissenting shares as between the corporation and the holders
thereof shall be filed with the secretary of the corporation.
(b) Subject to the provisions of Section 1306, payment of the fair market
value of dissenting shares shall be made within 30 days after the amount thereof
has been agreed or within 30 days after any statutory or contractual conditions
to the reorganization are satisfied, whichever is later, and in the case of
certificated securities, subject to surrender of the certificates therefor,
unless provided otherwise by agreement.
C-3
<PAGE> 164
SEC. 1304. ACTION TO DETERMINE WHETHER SHARES ARE DISSENTING SHARES OR FAIR
MARKET VALUE; LIMITATION; JOINDER; CONSOLIDATION; DETERMINATION OF
ISSUES; APPOINTMENT OF APPRAISERS
(a) If the corporation denies that the shares are dissenting shares, or the
corporation and the shareholder fail to agree upon the fair market value of the
shares, then the shareholder demanding purchase of such shares as dissenting
shares or any interested corporation, within six months after the date on which
notice of the approval by the outstanding shares (Section 152) or notice
pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder, but
not thereafter, may file a complaint in the superior court of the proper county
praying the court to determine whether the shares are dissenting shares or the
fair market value of the dissenting shares or both or may intervene in any
action pending on such a complaint.
(b) Two or more dissenting shareholders may join as plaintiffs or be joined
as defendants in any such action and two or more such actions may be
consolidated.
(c) On the trial of the action, the court shall determine the issues. If
the status of the shares as dissenting shares is in issue, the court shall first
determine that issue. If the fair market value of the dissenting shares is in
issue, the court shall determine, or shall appoint one or more impartial
appraisers to determine, the fair market value of the shares.
SEC. 1305. REPORT OF APPRAISERS; CONFIRMATION; DETERMINATION BY COURT; JUDGMENT,
PAYMENT; APPEAL; COSTS
(a) If the court appoints an appraiser or appraisers, they shall proceed
forthwith to determine the fair market value per share. Within the time fixed by
the court, the appraisers, or a majority of them, shall make and file a report
in the office of the clerk of the court. Thereupon, on the motion of any party,
the report shall be submitted to the court and considered on such evidence as
the court considers relevant. If the court finds the report reasonable, the
court may confirm it.
(b) If a majority of the appraisers appointed fail to make and file a
report within 10 days from the date of their appointment or within such further
time as may be allowed by the court or the report is not confirmed by the court,
the court shall determine the fair market value of the dissenting shares.
(c) Subject to the provisions of Section 1306, judgment shall be rendered
against the corporation for payment of an amount equal to the fair market value
of each dissenting share multiplied by the number of dissenting shares which any
dissenting shareholder who is a party, or who has intervened, is entitled to
require the corporation to purchase, with interest thereon at the legal rate
from the date on which judgment was entered.
(d) Any such judgment shall be payable forthwith with respect to
uncertificated securities and, with respect to certificated securities, only
upon the endorsement and delivery to the corporation of the certificates for the
shares described in the judgment. Any party may appeal from the judgment.
(e) The costs of the action, including reasonable compensation to the
appraisers to be fixed by the court, shall be assessed or apportioned as the
court considers equitable, but, if the appraisal exceeds the price offered by
the corporation, the corporation shall pay the costs (including in the
discretion of the court attorneys' fees, fees of expert witnesses and interest
at the legal rate on judgments from the date of compliance with Sections 1300,
C-4
<PAGE> 165
1301 and 1302 if the value awarded by the court for the shares is more than 125
percent of the price offered by the corporation under subdivision (a) of Section
1301).
SEC. 1306. PREVENTION OF IMMEDIATE PAYMENT; STATUS AS CREDITORS; INTEREST
To the extent that the provisions of Chapter 5 prevent the payment to any
holders of dissenting shares of their fair market value, they shall become
creditors of the corporation for the amount thereof together with interest at
the legal rate on judgments until the date of payment, but subordinate to all
other creditors in any liquidation proceeding, such debt to be payable when
permissible under the provisions of Chapter 5.
SEC. 1307. DIVIDENDS ON DISSENTING SHARES
Cash dividends declared and paid by the corporation upon the dissenting
shares after the date of approval of the reorganization by the outstanding
shares (Section 152) and prior to payment for the shares by the corporation
shall be credited against the total amount to be paid by the corporation
therefor.
SEC. 1308. RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS PENDING VALUATION; WITHDRAWAL OF
DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
Except as expressly limited in this chapter, holders of dissenting shares
continue to have all the rights and privileges incident to their shares, until
the fair market value of their shares is agreed upon or determined. A dissenting
shareholder may not withdraw a demand for payment unless the corporation
consents thereto.
SEC. 1309. TERMINATION OF DISSENTING SHARE AND SHAREHOLDER STATUS
Dissenting shares lose their status as dissenting shares and the holders
thereof cease to be dissenting shareholders and cease to be entitled to require
the corporation to purchase their shares upon the happening of any of the
following:
(a) The corporation abandons the reorganization. Upon abandonment of
the reorganization, the corporation shall pay on demand to any dissenting
shareholder who has initiated proceedings in good faith under this chapter
all necessary expenses incurred in such proceedings and reasonable
attorneys' fees.
(b) The shares are transferred prior to their submission for
endorsement in accordance with Section 1302 or are surrendered for
conversion into shares of another class in accordance with the articles.
(c) The dissenting shareholder and the corporation do not agree upon
the status of the shares as dissenting shares or upon the purchase price of
the shares, and neither files a complaint or intervenes in a pending action
as provided in Section 1304, within six months after the date on which
notice of the approval by the outstanding shares or notice pursuant to
subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder.
(d) The dissenting shareholder, with the consent of the corporation,
withdraws the shareholder's demand for purchase of the dissenting shares.
C-5
<PAGE> 166
SEC. 1310. SUSPENSION OF RIGHT TO COMPENSATION OR VALUATION PROCEEDINGS;
LITIGATION OF SHAREHOLDERS' APPROVAL
If litigation is instituted to test the sufficiency or regularity of the
votes of the shareholders in authorizing a reorganization, any proceedings under
Sections 1304 and 1305 shall be suspended until final determination of such
litigation.
SEC. 1311. EXEMPT SHARES
This chapter, except Section 1312, does not apply to classes of shares
whose terms and provisions specifically set forth the amount to be paid in
respect to such shares in the event of a reorganization or merger.
SEC. 1312. RIGHT OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDER TO ATTACK, SET ASIDE OR RESCIND
MERGER OR REORGANIZATION; RESTRAINING ORDER OR INJUNCTION; CONDITIONS
(a) No shareholder of a corporation who has a right under this chapter to
demand payment of cash for the shares held by the shareholder shall have any
right at law or in equity to attack the validity of the reorganization or
short-form merger, or to have the reorganization or short-form merger set aside
or rescinded, except in an action to test whether the number of shares required
to authorize or approve the reorganization have been legally voted in favor
thereof; but any holder of shares of a class whose terms and provisions
specifically set forth the amount to be paid in respect to them in the event of
a reorganization or short-form merger is entitled to payment in accordance with
those terms and provisions or, if the principal terms of the reorganization are
approved pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1202, is entitled to payment in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the approved reorganization.
(b) If one of the parties to a reorganization or short-form merger is
directly or indirectly controlled by, or under common control with, another
party to the reorganization or short-form merger, subdivision (a) shall not
apply to any shareholder of such party who has not demanded payment of cash for
such shareholder's shares pursuant to this chapter; but if the shareholder
institutes any action to attack the validity of the reorganization or short-form
merger or to have the reorganization or short-form merger set aside or
rescinded, the shareholder shall not thereafter have any right to demand payment
of cash for the shareholder's shares pursuant to this chapter. The court in any
action attacking the validity of the reorganization or short-form merger or to
have the reorganization or short-form merger set aside or rescinded shall not
restrain or enjoin the consummation of the transaction except upon 10 days'
prior notice to the corporation and upon a determination by the court that
clearly no other remedy will adequately protect the complaining shareholder or
the class of shareholders of which such shareholder is a member.
C-6
<PAGE> 167
PROXY SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION PROXY
P.O. BOX 98510, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89193-8510
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Thomas Y. Hartley and Lloyd T. Dyer as
Proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes
them to represent and to vote as designated below, all the shares of common
stock of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
August 10, 1999, at the Company's Headquarters at 5241 Spring Mountain Road, Las
Vegas, Nevada, and any adjournments thereof; and at their discretion, with
authorization to vote such shares on any other matters as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
George C. Biehl Michael B. Jager Carolyn M. Sparks
Manuel J. Cortez Leonard R. Judd Robert S. Sundt
Lloyd T. Dyer James J. Kropid Terrance L. Wright
Thomas Y. Hartley Michael O. Maffie
</TABLE>
[ ] FOR ALL [ ] FOR ALL EXCEPT*
---------------------------------- [ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL
*NOTE: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR A PARTICULAR NOMINEE, MARK THE FOR ALL
EXCEPT BOX AND ENTER THE NAME(S) OF THE EXCEPTIONS IN THE SPACE
PROVIDED. UNLESS AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ALL THE FOREGOING NOMINEES IS
WITHHELD, THIS PROXY WILL BE DEEMED TO CONFER AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR
EVERY NOMINEE WHOSE NAME IS NOT LISTED.
2. APPROVAL OF THE PRINCIPAL TERMS OF THE MERGER
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
3. APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP as the independent public
accountants of the Company
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
(IMPORTANT -- SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON REVERSE SIDE)
<PAGE> 168
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER(S). IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY
WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3. FURTHER, IF CUMULATIVE VOTING RIGHTS FOR
THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1) ARE EXERCISED AT THE MEETING, THE PROXIES
WILL CUMULATIVELY VOTE THEIR SHARES AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE PROXY STATEMENT.
Dated: , 1999
-------------------------------
(Signature)
-------------------------------
(Signature, if held jointly)
Please sign exactly as name
appears hereon. When shares are
held by joint tenants, both
should sign. When signing as
attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full
title as such. If a
corporation, please sign in
full corporate name by
president or other authorized
officer. If a partnership,
please sign in partnership name
by authorized person.
<PAGE> 169
[ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LETTERHEAD]
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Shareholders,
Southwest Gas Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Southwest Gas
Corporation (a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Company)
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1998 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 26, 1999
