<PAGE> 1
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MAY 9, 1997
REGISTRATION NO. 333-
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------
GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MARYLAND 94-3211970
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
</TABLE>
400 SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL, 11TH FLOOR
SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA 94402
(415) 343-9300
(ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF
REGISTRAR'S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
FRANK E. AUSTIN, ESQ.
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
400 SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL, 11TH FLOOR
SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA 94402
(415) 343-9300
(NAME, ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE,
OF AGENT FOR SERVICE)
COPIES TO:
STEPHEN J. SCHRADER, ESQ.
JUSTIN L. BASTIAN, ESQ.
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 PAGE MILL ROAD
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94304
(415) 813-5600
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following
box: [ ]
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933 (the "Securities Act"), other than securities offered only in connection
with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box: [X]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. [ ]
------------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED MAXIMUM PROPOSED MAXIMUM
TITLE OF EACH CLASS AMOUNT TO BE OFFERING PRICE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF
OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED REGISTERED(1) PER SHARE OFFERING PRICE REGISTRATION FEE
</TABLE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
Preferred Stock(3)....................
Common Stock(4).......................
Warrants(5)........................... $350,000,000 (2) $350,000,000 $106,061(6)
</TABLE>
================================================================================
(1) In no event will the aggregate maximum offering price of all securities to
this Registration Statement exceed $350,000,000. Any securities registered
hereunder may be sold separately or as units with other securities
registered hereunder.
(2) The proposed maximum offering price per unit (a) has been omitted pursuant
to instruction II.D. of Form S-3 and (b) will be determined, from time to
time, by the Registrants in connection with the issuance by the Registrant
of the securities registered hereunder.
(3) Subject to footnote (1), there is being registered hereunder an
indeterminate number of shares of Preferred Stock as may be sold, from time
to time, by the Company, or may be issued upon exercise of Warrants
registered hereunder.
(4) Subject to footnote (1), there is being registered hereunder an
indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock as may be sold, from time to
time, by Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the "Company"). There is
also being registered hereunder an indeterminate number of shares of Common
Stock that may be issued upon conversion of Preferred Stock registered
hereunder or upon exercise of Warrants registered hereunder, as the case may
be.
(5) Subject to footnote (1), there is being registered hereunder an
indeterminate number of Warrants representing rights to purchase shares of
Preferred Stock or Common Stock registered hereunder.
(6) Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) of the rules and regulations under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
------------------------
PURSUANT TO RULE 429 UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, THE PROSPECTUS
INCLUDED IN THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT IS A COMBINED PROSPECTUS AND RELATES TO
REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 333-19279 PREVIOUSLY FILED BY THE COMPANY ON FORM S-3
AND DECLARED EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 25, 1997. THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS
EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE AN AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY
STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
================================================================================
<PAGE> 2
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR
MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR
THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE
UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS
OF ANY SUCH STATE.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED MAY 9, 1997
PROSPECTUS
$529,125,000
GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
PREFERRED STOCK, COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS
------------------------
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the "Company") may from time to time
offer in one or more series or classes (i) shares or fractional shares of its
preferred stock, par value $.001 (the "Preferred Stock"), (ii) shares of its
common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Common Stock") and (iii) warrants
to purchase shares of Preferred Stock or Common Stock (the "Warrants") in
amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined at the time of offering, with
an aggregate public offering price of up to $529,125,000. The Preferred Stock,
Common Stock and Warrants (collectively, the "Offered Securities") may be
offered, separately or together, in separate series in amounts, at prices and on
terms to be set forth in one or more supplements to the Prospectus (each a
"Prospectus Supplement").
The specific terms of the Offered Securities in respect to which this
Prospectus is being delivered will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement and will include, where applicable (i) in the case of Preferred
Stock, the specific title and stated value, any dividend, liquidation,
redemption, conversion, voting and other rights, and any initial public offering
price; (ii) in the case of Common Stock, the specific title and stated value and
any initial public offering price and (iii) in the case of Warrants, the
duration, offering price, exercise price and detachability. In addition, such
specific terms may include limitations on direct or beneficial ownership and
restrictions on transfer of the Offered Securities, in each case as may be
appropriate to preserve the status of the Company as a real estate investment
trust ("REIT") for federal income tax purposes.
The applicable Prospectus Supplement will also contain information, where
applicable, about certain United States Federal Income Tax Consequences relating
to, and any listing on a securities exchange of, the Offered Securities covered
by such Prospectus Supplement.
The Offered Securities may be offered directly, through agents designated
from time to time by the Company or the Operating Partnership, or to or through
underwriters or dealers. If any agents or underwriters are involved in the sale
of any of the Offered Securities, their names, and any applicable purchase
price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between or among them, will be
set forth or will be calculable from the information set forth in the applicable
Prospectus Supplement. See "Plan of Distribution." No Offered Securities may be
sold without delivery of the applicable Prospectus Supplement describing the
method and terms of the offering of such Offered Securities.
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 5 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS
THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE OFFERED SECURITIES.
------------------------
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
------------------------
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS , 1997.
<PAGE> 3
NO PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY
REPRESENTATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED OR
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS PROSPECTUS OR AN APPLICABLE PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT
BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY, THE OPERATING
PARTNERSHIP OR ANY UNDERWRITER, DEALER OR AGENT. THIS PROSPECTUS AND ANY
APPLICABLE PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY IN ANY
JURISDICTION TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR
SOLICITATION IN SUCH JURISDICTION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS OR
ANY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCES CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE
AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY OR THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP SINCE THE DATE HEREOF OR
THEREOF.
2
<PAGE> 4
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in accordance
therewith the Company files proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). The Registration
Statement, and exhibits and schedules forming a part thereof and the reports,
proxy statements and other information filed with the Commission in accordance
with the Exchange Act can be inspected and copied at the Commission's Public
Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20549, and at the
following regional offices of the Commission: Seven World Trade Center, 13th
Floor, New York, New York 10048 and 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400,
Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511. Copies of such material can be obtained from the
Public Reference Section of the Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. The address of the Commission's Web Site is
(http://www.sec.gov). In addition, the Common Stock is listed on the New York
Stock Exchange and similar information concerning the Company can be inspected
and copied at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street,
New York, New York 10005.
The Company has filed with the Commission registration statements on Form
S-3 (the "Registration Statements") (of which this Prospectus is a part) under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), with respect to
the Offered Securities. This Prospectus does not contain all of the information
set forth in the Registration Statements, certain portions of which have been
omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Commission. Statements
contained in this Prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other
documents are not necessarily complete, and in each instance reference is made
to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statements, each such statement being qualified in all respects by
such reference and the exhibits and schedules thereto. For further information
regarding the Company and the Offered Securities, reference is hereby made to
the Registration Statements and such exhibits and schedules which may be
obtained from the Commission at its principal office in Washington, D.C., upon
payment of the fees prescribed by the Commission.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The documents listed below have been filed by the Company under the
Exchange Act with the Commission and are incorporated herein by reference:
a. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1996;
b. The Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on
February 5, 1997, March 19, 1997, April 23, 1997, April 24, 1997, April
25, 1997 and May 2, 1997, respectively;
c. The Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K/A, filed with the Commission
on February 24, 1997;
d. The description of the Registrant's Common Stock contained in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 1-14162).
All documents filed by the Company and the Operating Partnership pursuant
to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the
date of this Prospectus and prior to the termination of the offering of the
Offered Securities shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference in this
Prospectus and to be part hereof from the date of filing such documents.
Any statement contained herein or in a document incorporated or deemed to
be incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded
for purposes of this Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein
(or in the applicable Prospectus Supplement) or in any other subsequently filed
document which also is or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein
modifies or supersedes such statement. Any such statement so modified or
superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to
constitute a part of this Prospectus (or in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement).
Copies of all documents which are incorporated herein by reference (not
including the exhibits to such information, unless such exhibits are
specifically incorporated by reference in such information) will be provided
without charge to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this
Prospectus is delivered upon written or oral request. Requests should be
directed to the Vice President, Capital Markets, Glenborough Realty Trust
Incorporated, 400 South El Camino Real, Suite 1100, San Mateo, California
95402-1708, telephone number (415) 343-9300.
3
<PAGE> 5
As used herein, the term "Company" means Glenborough Realty Trust
Incorporated, a Maryland real estate investment trust, and its consolidated
subsidiaries for the periods from and after December 31, 1995 (the date of the
merger of eight public limited partnerships and Glenborough Corporation, a
California corporation, (the "Predecessors") with and into the Company (the
"Consolidation")). This Prospectus and the documents incorporated herein contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, which statements involve risks and
uncertainties. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including those set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Prospectus.
Unless otherwise indicated, ownership percentages of the Company's Common Stock
have been computed on a fully converted basis, using an exchange of Operating
Partnership units for Common Stock on a one-for-one basis.
THE COMPANY
The Company is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment
trust (a "REIT") that owns a portfolio of 76 office, industrial, retail,
multifamily and hotel properties (the "Properties") located in 20 states
throughout the country, as of April 30, 1997. The Company's principal growth
strategy is to capitalize on the opportunity to acquire portfolios or single
properties from public and private partnerships on attractive terms. This
strategy has evolved from the Company's predecessors' experience since 1978 in
managing real estate partnerships and their assets and, since 1989, in acquiring
management interests from third parties. In addition, three associated companies
(the "Associated Companies") provide comprehensive asset, partnership and
property management services for 65 other properties that are not owned by the
Company.
A portion of the Company's operations is conducted through a subsidiary
operating partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), in which the Company holds
a 1% interest as the sole general partner and in which the Company holds an
approximate 90.5% limited partner interest, as of April 30, 1997.
The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the Symbol
"GLB." The Company commenced operations on December 31, 1995, through the merger
of eight public limited partnerships and a management company with and into the
Company. The Company's executive offices are located at 400 South El Camino
Real, Suite 1100, San Mateo, California 94402-1708 and its telephone number is
(415) 343-9300.
TAX STATUS OF THE COMPANY
The Company will elect to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), commencing with
its taxable year ended December 31, 1996. As a REIT, the Company generally will
not be subject to Federal income tax on net income that it distributes to its
stockholders. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company
may be subject to certain Federal, state and local taxes on its income and
property. See "Federal Income Tax Consequences."
4
<PAGE> 6
RISK FACTORS
Prospective investors should read this entire Prospectus carefully,
including all appendices and supplements hereto, and should consider carefully
the following factors before purchasing the Offered Securities offered hereby.
LITIGATION RELATED TO CONSOLIDATION
Recent business reorganizations sponsored by others involving the
conversion of partnerships into corporations have given rise to a number of
investor lawsuits. These lawsuits have included claims against the general
partners of the participating partnerships, the partnerships themselves and
related persons involved in the structuring of or benefiting from the conversion
or reorganization, as well as claims against the surviving entity and its
directors and officers. The lawsuits have included, among others, claims that
the structure of the reorganizations, as well as the manner in which they were
submitted for investor approval, involved violations of federal and state
securities laws, common law fraud and negligent misrepresentations, breaches of
fiduciary duty, unfair and deceptive trade practices, negligence and waste,
breaches of the partnership documents of the participating partnerships, failure
to comply with applicable reporting requirements, violations of the rules of the
NASD on suitability and fair practices, and violations of the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Two lawsuits have been filed
contesting the fairness of the Consolidation, one in California state court and
one in federal court. A settlement of the state court action has been approved
by the court, but objectors to the settlement have appealed that approval. The
Company and the other defendants in the state court action have filed a
responsive brief and the appeal is now pending. Plaintiffs in the federal court
action have agreed voluntarily to take the action off calendar pending
resolution of the state court action.
From time to time the Company is involved in other litigation arising out
of its business activities. It is possible that this litigation and the other
litigation previously described could result in significant losses in excess of
amounts reserved, which could have an adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations and the financial condition of the Company.
CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION OF PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATION BY SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Robert and Andrew Batinovich, two of the senior officers of the Company,
were also senior members of a management team that formed a publicly registered
limited partnership in 1986 to consolidate a number of predecessor partnerships.
That public partnership was involved in litigation with its primary creditor and
in order to prevent foreclosure filed a petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in May of 1992. The public
partnership, the primary subsidiary of which is GPA, Ltd., which owns an
approximately 4.9% limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership along
with other substantial real estate assets, settled the litigation and obtained
confirmation of a plan of reorganization in January 1994. Investors in the
Common Stock should consider that the consolidation of partnerships into GPA,
Ltd.'s parent partnership did not achieve all of the objectives stated at the
time and should further consider the relevance of that fact to their investment
in the Common Stock of the Company.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions Could Adversely Affect Operations or Stock Value
Consistent with its growth strategy, the Company is continually pursuing
and evaluating potential acquisition opportunities, and is from time to time
actively considering the possible acquisition of specific properties, which may
include properties managed or controlled by one of the Associated Companies or
owned by affiliated parties. It is possible that one or more of such possible
future acquisitions, if completed, could adversely affect the Company's funds
from operations or cash available for distribution, in the short term or the
long term or both, or increase the Company's debt, or be perceived negatively
among investors such that such an acquisition could be followed by a decline in
the market value of the Common Stock.
5
<PAGE> 7
Expansion Risk
The Company is experiencing a period of rapid expansion, which management
expects will continue in the near future. This growth has increased the
operating complexity of the Company as well as the level of responsibility for
both existing and new management personnel. The Company's ability to manage its
expansion effectively will require it to continue to update its operational and
financial systems and to expand, train and manage its employee base. The
Company's inability to effectively manage its expansion could have an adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Conflict of Interest
The Company has acquired, and from time to time may acquire, properties
from partnerships that Robert Batinovich, the Company's Chief Executive Officer,
and Andrew Batinovich, the Company's Chief Operating Officer, control, and in
which they and members of their families have substantial interests. It is also
possible that the Company may enter into transactions to acquire other
properties controlled by these individuals or in which they or members of their
families have substantial interests in the future. These transactions involve or
will involve conflicts of interest. These transactions may provide substantial
economic benefits such as the payments or unit issuances, relief or deferral of
tax liabilities, relief of primary or secondary liability for debt, and
reduction in exposure to other property-related liabilities. Despite the
presence of appraisals or fairness opinions or review by parties who have no
interest in the transactions, the transactions will not be the product of
arm's-length negotiation and there can be no assurance that these transactions
will be as favorable to the Company as transactions that the Company negotiates
with unrelated parties or will not result in undue benefit to Robert and Andrew
Batinovich and members of their families. Neither Robert Batinovich nor Andrew
Batinovich has guaranteed that any properties acquired from entities they
control or in which they or their families have a significant interest will be
as profitable as other investments made by the Company or will not result in
losses.
Assumption of General Partner Liabilities
The Company and its predecessors have acquired a number of their properties
by acquiring partnerships that own the properties or by first acquiring general
partnership interests and at a later date acquiring the properties, and the
Company may pursue acquisitions in this manner in the future. When the Company
uses this acquisition technique, a subsidiary of the Company becomes a general
partner. As a general partner the Company's subsidiary becomes generally liable
for the debts and obligations of the partnership, including debts and
obligations that may be contingent or unknown at the time of the acquisition. In
addition, the Company's subsidiary assumes obligations under the partnership
agreements, which may include obligations to make future contributions for the
benefit of other partners. The Company undertakes detailed due diligence reviews
to ascertain the nature and extent of obligations that its subsidiary will
assume when it becomes a general partner, but there can be no assurance that the
obligations assumed will not exceed the Company's estimates or that the assumed
liabilities will not have an adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations or financial condition. In addition, an Associated Company may enter
into management agreements pursuant to which it assumes certain obligations as
manager of properties. There can be no assurance that these obligations will not
have an adverse effect on the Associated Companies' results of operations or
financial condition, which could adversely affect the value of the Company's
preferred stock interest in those companies.
Risks Relating to Tender Offers
The Company may, as part of its growth strategy, acquire properties and
portfolios of properties through tender offer acquisitions of interests in
public and private partnerships. Tender offers often result in competing tender
offers, as well as litigation initiated by limited partners in the subject
partnerships or by competing bidders. Due to the inherent uncertainty of
litigation, the Company could be subject to adverse judgments in substantial
amounts. As the Company has not yet attempted an acquisition through the tender
offer process, and because of competing offers and possible litigation, there
can be no assurance that, if undertaken, the
6
<PAGE> 8
Company would be successful in acquiring properties through a tender offer or
that the tender offer process would not result in litigation and a significant
judgment adverse to the Company.
CERTAIN TAX RISKS
Consequences of Failure to Qualify as a REIT
The Company intends to elect to be treated as a REIT under the Code
commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 1996. No assurance can be
given, however, that the Company will be able to operate in a manner which would
permit it to qualify to make this election. Qualification as a REIT involves the
satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis)
established under highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only
limited judicial or administrative interpretation exists, and involves the
determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within
the Company's control. The Company will receive nonqualifying management fee
income and will own nonqualifying preferred stock in the Associated Companies.
As a result, the Company may approach the income and asset test limits imposed
by the Code and could be at risk of not satisfying those tests. In order to
avoid exceeding the asset test limit, for example, the Company may have to
reduce its interest in the Associated Companies. The Company is relying on the
opinion of its tax counsel regarding its ability to qualify as a REIT. This
legal opinion is not binding on the IRS. See "Federal Income Tax
Consequences -- Taxation of the Company."
If the Company were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the
Company would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable
alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at corporate rates. Moreover,
unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, the Company also
would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years
following the year during which qualification is lost. This treatment would
reduce the net earnings of the Company available for investment or distribution
to stockholders because of the additional tax liability to the Company for the
years involved. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer be
required to be made. See "Federal Income Tax Consequences -- Failure to
Qualify."
Even if the Company qualifies as a REIT, it will be subject to certain
federal, state and local taxes on its income and property. See "Federal Income
Tax Consequences -- Taxation of the Company."
Possible Changes in Tax Laws
Income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, prospectively or
retroactively, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time. No
assurance can be given that legislation, regulations, administrative
interpretations or court decisions will not significantly change the tax laws
with respect to the qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax
consequences of this qualification. In addition to any direct effects the
changes might have, the changes might also indirectly affect the market value of
all real estate investments, and consequently the ability of the Company to
realize its investment objectives.
RISKS RELATING TO REAL ESTATE
Environmental Matters
All of the Properties presently owned by the Company have been subject to
Phase I environmental assessments by independent environmental consultants. Some
of the Phase I environmental assessments recommended further investigations in
the form of Phase II environmental assessments, including soil and groundwater
sampling, and all of these investigations have been completed by the Company or
are in the process of being completed. Certain of the Properties owned by the
Company have been found to contain ACMs. The Company believes that these
materials have been adequately contained and that an ACM operations and
maintenance program has been implemented or is in the process of being
implemented for the Properties found to contain ACMs.
Some, but not all, of the properties owned by partnerships managed by the
Associated Companies have been subject to Phase I environmental assessments by
independent environmental consultants. The Associated Companies determine on a
case-by-case basis whether to obtain Phase I environmental assessments on these
7
<PAGE> 9
properties and whether to undertake further investigation or remediation.
Certain of these properties contain ACMs. In each case the responsible
Associated Company believes that these materials have been adequately contained
and that an ACM operations and maintenance program has been implemented for the
properties found to contain ACMs.
Six of the Properties owned by the Company are leased in whole or in part
to an operator of auto care centers which include oil change and tune-up
facilities, and ten of the Properties are leased to operators of convenience
stores which sell petroleum-based fuels. These Properties and other of the
Properties contain, and/or may have contained in the past, underground storage
tanks for the storage of petroleum products and/or other hazardous or toxic
substances which create a potential for release of petroleum products and/or
other hazardous or toxic substances. Some of the Properties owned by the Company
are adjacent to or near properties that have contained in the past or currently
contain, underground storage tanks used to store petroleum products or other
hazardous or toxic substances. Several of the Properties have been contaminated
with petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances from on-site
operations or operations on adjacent or nearby properties. In addition, certain
of the Properties are on, adjacent to or near properties upon which others have
engaged or may in the future engage in activities that may release petroleum
products or other hazardous or toxic substances.
Although tenants of the Properties owned by the Company generally are
required by their leases to operate in compliance with all applicable federal,
state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations and to indemnify
the Company against any environmental liability arising from the tenants'
activities on the Properties, the Company could nevertheless be subject to
environmental liability relating to its management of the Properties or strict
liability by virtue of its ownership interest in the Properties and there can be
no assurance that the tenants would satisfy their indemnification obligations
under the leases. There can be no assurance that any environmental assessments
of the Properties owned by the Company, properties being considered for
acquisition by the Company, or the properties owned by the partnerships managed
by the Associated Companies have revealed all potential environmental
liabilities, that any prior owner or prior or current operator of such
properties did not create an environmental condition not known to the Company or
that an environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more
of such properties that could have an adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations and financial condition, either directly (with respect to properties
owned by the Company), or indirectly (with respect to properties owned by
partnerships managed by an Associated Company) by adversely affecting the
financial condition of the Associated Company and thus the value of the
Company's preferred stock interest in the Associated Company. Moreover, there
can be no assurance that (i) future environmental laws, ordinances or
regulations will not have an adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations and financial condition or (ii) the current environmental condition
of such properties will not be affected by tenants and occupants of such
properties, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of the
properties (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third
parties unrelated to the Company.
Risks Related to Ownership and Financing of Real Estate
The Company is subject to risks generally incidental to the ownership of
real estate, including changes in general economic or local conditions, changes
in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area, the
impact of environmental protection laws, changes in interest rates and
availability of financing which may render the sale or financing of a property
difficult or unattractive, changes in tax, real estate and zoning laws, and the
creation of mechanics' liens or similar encumbrances placed on the property by a
lessee or other parties without the Company's knowledge and consent. Should any
of these events occur, there could be an adverse effect on the Company's results
of operations and financial condition.
Availability of Real Estate for Acquisitions
The Company's growth is dependent upon acquisitions. There can be no
assurance that properties will be available for acquisition or, if available,
that the Company will be able to purchase such properties on favorable terms. If
such acquisitions are not available it could have a negative impact on the
growth of the Company, which could have an adverse effect on the performance of
the Company's Common Stock.
8
<PAGE> 10
Competition for Acquisition of Real Estate
The Company faces competition from other businesses, individuals, fiduciary
accounts and plans and other entities in the acquisition, operation and sale of
its properties. Some of the Company's competitors are larger and have greater
financial resources than the Company. This competition may result in a higher
cost for properties the Company wishes to purchase.
Competition for Tenants
The Company is subject to the risk that when space becomes available at its
properties the leases may not be renewed, the space may not be let or relet, or
the terms of the renewal or reletting (including the cost of required
renovations or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable to the Company.
Although the Company has established annual property budgets that include
estimates of costs for renovation and reletting expenses that it believes are
reasonable in light of each property's situation, no assurance can be given that
these estimates will sufficiently cover these expenses. If the Company is unable
to promptly lease all or substantially all of the space at its properties, if
the rental rates are significantly lower than expected, or if the Company's
reserves for these purposes prove inadequate, then there could be an adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Tenants' Defaults
The ability of the Company to manage its assets is subject to federal
bankruptcy laws and state laws affecting creditors' rights and remedies
available to real property owners. In the event of the financial failure or
bankruptcy of a tenant, there can be no assurance that the Company could
promptly recover the tenant's premises from the tenant or from a trustee or
debtor-in-possession in any bankruptcy proceeding filed by or against that
tenant, or that the Company would receive rent in the proceeding sufficient to
cover its expenses with respect to the premises. In the event of the bankruptcy
of a tenant, the Company will be subject to the provisions of the federal
bankruptcy code, which in some instances may restrict the amount and
recoverability of claims held by the Company against the tenant. If any tenant
defaults on its obligations to the Company, there could be an adverse effect on
the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Management, Leasing and Brokerage Risks; Lack of Control of Associated
Companies
The Company is subject to the risks associated with the property
management, leasing and brokerage businesses. These risks include the risk that
management contracts or service agreements may be terminated, that contracts
will not be renewed upon expiration or will not be renewed on terms consistent
with current terms, and that leasing and brokerage activity generally may
decline. Acquisition of properties by the Company from the Associated Companies
could result in a decrease in revenues to the Associated Companies and a
corresponding decrease in dividends received by the Company from the Associated
Companies. Each of these developments could have an adverse effect on the
Company's results of operations and financial condition.
To qualify for and to maintain the Company's status as a REIT while
realizing income from the Company's third-party management business, the capital
stock of Glenborough Hotel Group, a Nevada corporation ("GHG"), Glenborough
Corporation, a California corporation ("GC") and Glenborough Inland Realty
Corporation, a California corporation ("GIRC," and collectively with GHG and GC,
the "Associated Companies") (which conduct the Company's third-party management,
leasing and brokerage businesses) is divided into two classes. All of the voting
common stock of the Associated Companies, representing 5% of the total equity of
GC and GIRC, and 25% of the total equity of GHG, is held by individual
stockholders. Nonvoting preferred stock representing the remaining equity of
each Associated Company is held entirely by the Company. Although the Company
holds a majority of the equity interest in each Associated Company, the Company
is not able to elect directors of any Associated Company and, consequently, the
Company has no ability to influence the day-to-day decisions of each entity.
9
<PAGE> 11
Uninsured Loss
The Company or in certain instances tenants of the properties carry
comprehensive liability, fire and extended coverage with respect to the
Company's properties, with policy specification and insured limits customarily
carried for similar properties. There are, however, certain types of losses
(such as from earthquakes and floods) that may be either uninsurable or not
economically insurable. Further, certain of the properties are located in areas
that are subject to earthquake activity and floods. Should a property sustain
damage as a result of an earthquake or flood, the Company may incur losses due
to insurance deductibles, co-payments on insured losses or uninsured losses.
Should an uninsured loss occur, the Company could lose some or all of its
capital investment, cash flow and anticipated profits related to one or more
properties, which could have an adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations and financial condition.
Illiquidity of Real Estate
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, will tend
to limit the ability of the Company to vary its portfolio promptly in response
to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and individual agreements with sellers of
properties place limits on the Company's ability to sell properties, which may
adversely affect returns to holders of Common Stock. Twenty-four of the
properties owned by the Operating Partnership were acquired on terms and
conditions under which they can be disposed of only in a like-kind exchange or
other non-taxable transaction.
Potential Liability Under the Americans With Disabilities Act
As of January 26, 1992, all of the Company's properties were required to be
in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act (the "ADA"). The ADA
generally requires that places of public accommodation be made accessible to
people with disabilities to the extent readily achievable. Compliance with the
ADA requirements could require removal of access barriers and non-compliance
could result in imposition of fines by the federal government, an award of
damages to private litigants and/or a court order to remove access barriers.
Because of the limited history of the ADA, the impact of its application to the
Company's properties, including the extent and timing of required renovations,
is uncertain. Pursuant to certain lease agreements with tenants in certain of
the "single-tenant" Properties, the tenants are obligated to comply with the ADA
provisions. If the Company's costs are greater than anticipated or tenants are
unable to meet their obligations, there could be an adverse effect on the
Company's results of operations and financial condition.
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company's future growth depends in large part upon its ability to raise
additional capital on satisfactory terms or at all. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to raise sufficient capital to achieve its
objectives. If the Company were to raise additional capital through the issuance
of additional equity securities, or securities convertible into or exercisable
for equity securities, the interests of holders of the Offered Securities could
be diluted. Likewise, the Company's Board of Directors is authorized to cause
the Company to issue Preferred Stock in one or more series and to determine the
distributions and voting and other rights of the Preferred Stock. Accordingly,
the Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of Preferred Stock with
voting, distribution and other similar rights which could be dilutive to or
otherwise adversely affect the interests of holders of Offered Securities. If
the Company were to raise additional capital through debt financing, the Company
will be subject to the risks described below, among others.
LIMITATION ON OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK MAY PRECLUDE ACQUISITION OF CONTROL
Provisions of the Company's Articles of Incorporation are designed to
assist the Company in maintaining its qualification as a REIT under the Code by
preventing concentrated ownership of the Company which might jeopardize REIT
qualification. Among other things, these provisions provide that (a) any
transfer or acquisition of Common Stock that would result in the
disqualification of the Company as a REIT under the Code will be void, and (b)
if any person attempts to acquire shares of Common Stock that after the
10
<PAGE> 12
acquisition would cause the person to own or to be deemed to own, by operation
of certain attribution rules set out in the Code, an amount of Common Stock in
excess of a predetermined limit, which, pursuant to Board action, currently is
9.75% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (the "Ownership Limitation" and
as to the Common Stock, the transfer of which would cause any person to actually
own Common Stock in excess of the Ownership Limitation, the "Excess Shares"),
the transfer shall be void and the Common Stock subject to the transfer shall
automatically be transferred to an unaffiliated trustee for the benefit of a
charitable organization designated by the Board of Directors of the Company
until sold by the trustee to a third party or purchased by the Company. Robert
Batinovich, his spouse and children (including Andrew Batinovich) and
individuals or entities whose ownership of Common Stock is attributed to Robert
Batinovich in determining the number of shares of Common Stock owned by him for
purposes of compliance with Section 856 of the Code (the "Attributed Owners"),
are exempt from these restrictions, but are prohibited from acquiring shares of
Common Stock if, after the acquisition, they would own in excess of 10.50% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock. This limitation on the ownership of
Common Stock may have the effect of precluding the acquisition of control of the
Company by a third party without the consent of the Board of Directors. If the
Board of Directors waives the Ownership Limitation for any person, the Ownership
Limitation shall be proportionally and automatically reduced with regard to all
other persons such that no five persons may own more than 49% of the Common
Stock (the aggregate Ownership Limitations as to all of these persons, as
adjusted, the "Adjusted Ownership Limitation"). See "Description of Common
Stock -- Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of Common Stock" and "Federal
Income Tax Consequences."
OTHER RISKS
Debt Financing
The Company intends to incur additional indebtedness in the future,
including through borrowings under a credit facility, if a credit facility is
available, to finance property acquisitions. As a result, the Company expects to
be subject to risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that
interest rates may increase, the risk that the Company's cash flow will be
insufficient to meet required payments on its debt and the risk that the Company
may be unable to refinance or repay the debt as it comes due. The Company's
current $50 million secured revolving line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
provides that distributions may not exceed 90% of funds from operations and
that, in the event of a failure to pay principal or interest on borrowings
thereunder when due (subject to any applicable grace period), the Company and
its subsidiaries may not pay any distributions on the Common Stock or the
Preferred Stock. If the Company is unable to obtain acceptable financing to
repay indebtedness at maturity, the Company may have to sell properties to repay
indebtedness or properties may be foreclosed upon, which could have an adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Dependence on Executive Officers
The Company is dependent on the efforts of Robert and Andrew Batinovich,
its President and Chief Executive Officer and its Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, respectively, and of its
other executive officers. The loss of the services of any of them could have an
adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the
Company.
Board of Directors May Change Investment Policies
The descriptions in this Prospectus of the major policies and the various
types of investments to be made by the Company reflect only the current plans of
the Company's Board of Directors. The Company's Board of Directors may change
the investment policies of the Company without a vote of the stockholders. If
the Company changes its investment policies, the risks and potential rewards of
an investment in the Company may also change. In addition, the methods of
implementing the Company's investment policies may vary as new investment
techniques are developed.
11
<PAGE> 13
Effect of Market Interest Rates on Price of Common Stock
One of the factors that may influence the market price of the shares of
Common Stock in public markets will be the annual yield on the price paid for
shares of Common Stock from distributions by the Company. An increase in market
interest rates may lead prospective purchasers of the Common Stock to seek a
higher annual yield from their investments. Such circumstances may adversely
affect the market price of the Common Stock.
Shares Available for Future Sale
No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of
shares of Common Stock or future conversions or exercises of securities for
future sales, including shares of Common Stock issuable upon exchange of
Operating Partnership units, will have on the market price of the Common Stock
prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock, or
the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect the prevailing
market price for the Common Stock.
USE OF PROCEEDS
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the
Company intends to invest the net proceeds from any sale of the Offered
Securities for general corporate purposes including, without limitation, the
acquisition and development of properties and the repayment of debt. Net
proceeds from the sale of the Offered Securities initially may be temporarily
invested in short-term securities.
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The Company's ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and for the three-month period ended March 31, 1997 was 2.56x
and 2.65x, respectively. Prior to the Consolidation, the Company's Predecessors'
combined ratio of earnings to fixed charges for 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995 was
(0.37x), 2.67x, 2.58x and 1.41x, respectively. The ratio of earnings to fixed
charges is computed as income from operations, before minority interest, income
taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges (primarily interest expense)
divided by fixed charges. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges was less than
1.0 in 1992 due to a non-recurring loss provision that did not affect cash flow.
To date, the Company has not issued any shares of preferred stock; therefore,
the ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred share dividends
are unchanged from the ratios presented in this section.
12
<PAGE> 14
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED STOCK
Subject to limitations prescribed by Maryland law and the Company's
Articles of Incorporation and Articles Supplementary (collectively, the
"Charter"), the Board of Directors is authorized to issue, from the authorized
but unissued capital stock of the Company, Preferred Stock in such classes or
series as the Board of Directors may determine and to establish from time to
time the number of shares of Preferred Stock to be included in any such class or
series and to fix the designation and any preferences, conversion and other
rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications
and terms and conditions of redemption of the shares of any such class or
series, and such other subjects or matters as may be fixed by resolution of the
Board of Directors. The issuance of Preferred Stock may have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company.
Preferred Stock, upon issuance against full payment of the purchase price
therefor, will be fully paid and nonassessable. The specific terms of a
particular class or series of Preferred Stock will be described in the
Prospectus Supplement relating to that class or series, including a Prospectus
Supplement providing that Preferred Stock may be issuable upon the exercise of
Warrants issued by the Company. The description of Preferred Stock set forth
below and the description of the terms of a particular class or series of
Preferred Stock set forth in a Prospectus Supplement do not purport to be
complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the articles
supplementary relating to that class or series.
The rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the Preferred Stock
of each class or series will be fixed by the articles supplementary relating to
such class or series. A Prospectus Supplement, relating to each class or series,
will specify the terms of the Preferred Stock as follows:
(1) The title and stated value of such Preferred Stock;
(2) The number of shares of such Preferred Stock offered, the
liquidation preference per share and the offering price of such Preferred
Stock;
(3) The dividend rate(s), period(s), and/or payment date(s) or
method(s) of calculation thereof applicable to such Preferred Stock;
(4) Whether such Preferred Stock is cumulative or not and, if
cumulative, the date from which dividends on such Preferred Stock shall
accumulate;
(5) The procedures for any auction and remarketing, if any, for such
Preferred Stock;
(6) The provision for a sinking fund, if any, for such Preferred
Stock;
(7) The provision for redemption, if applicable, of such Preferred
Stock;
(8) Any listing of such Preferred Stock on any securities exchange;
(9) The terms and conditions, if applicable, upon which such Preferred
Stock will be converted into Common Stock of the Company, including the
conversion price (or manner of calculation thereof);
(10) A discussion of any material federal income tax consequences
applicable to such Preferred Stock;
(11) Any limitations on direct or beneficial ownership and
restrictions on transfer, in each case as may be appropriate to preserve
the status of the Company as a REIT;
(12) The relative ranking and preferences of such Preferred Stock as
to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of the affairs of the Company;
(13) Any limitations on issuance of any class or series of preferred
stock ranking senior to or on a parity with such class or series of
Preferred Stock as to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company;
(14) Any other specific terms, preferences, rights, limitations or
restrictions of such Preferred Stock; and
(15) Any voting rights of such Preferred Stock.
13
<PAGE> 15
Unless otherwise specified in the Prospectus Supplement, the Preferred
Stock will, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Company, rank (i) senior to all classes or
series of Common Stock and Excess Stock of the Company, and to all equity
securities ranking junior to such Preferred Stock with respect to dividend
rights or rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company;
(ii) on a parity with all equity securities issued by the Company the terms of
which specifically provide that such equity securities rank on a parity with the
Preferred Stock with respect to dividends rights or rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Company; and (iii) junior to all equity
securities issued by the Company the terms of which specifically provide that
such equity securities rank senior to the Preferred Stock with respect to
dividend rights or rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the
Company.
The terms and conditions, if any, upon which shares of any class or series
of Preferred Stock are convertible into Common Stock will be set forth in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement relating thereto. Such terms will include the
number of shares of Common Stock into which the Preferred Stock is convertible,
the conversion price (or manner of calculation thereof), the conversion period,
provisions as to whether conversion will be at the option of the holders of the
Preferred Stock or the Company, the events requiring an adjustment of the
conversion price and provisions affecting conversion in the event of the
redemption of such Preferred Stock.
All certificates representing shares of Preferred Stock will bear a legend
referring to the restrictions described above.
All persons who own, directly or by virtue of the attribution provisions of
the Code, more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock and Preferred Stock (or
1% if there are fewer than 2,000 stockholders) must file an affidavit with the
Company containing the information specified in the Charter within 30 days after
December 31 of each year. In addition, each stockholder shall upon demand be
required to disclose to the Company in writing such information with respect to
the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of shares as the Board of
Directors deems necessary to determine the Company's status as a real estate
investment trust and to insure compliance with the Ownership Limit.
The articles supplementary, if applicable, for the Offered Securities may
also contain provisions that further restrict the ownership and transfer of the
Offered Securities. The applicable Prospectus Supplement will specify any
additional ownership limitation relating to the Offered Securities.
14
<PAGE> 16
DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK
The following description of the Common Stock sets forth certain general
terms and provisions of the Common Stock to which any Prospectus Supplement may
relate, including a Prospectus Supplement providing that Common Stock will be
issuable upon conversion of Preferred Stock or upon the exercise of Warrants
issued by the Company. This description is in all respects subject to and
qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of the
Company's Charter and its Bylaws. The Common Stock is listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol "GLB." Registrar and Transfer Company is the
Company's transfer agent.
GENERAL
The Company's Charter authorizes the Company to issue up to 50,000,000
shares of Common Stock with a par value of $.001 per share. As of April 30, 1997
there were 13,194,692 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, and no
shares of Excess Stock were issued and outstanding. Under Maryland law,
stockholders generally are not liable for the Company's debts or obligations.
The holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on
all matters voted on by stockholders, including election of directors, and,
except as provided in the Charter in respect of any other class of or series of
stock, the holders of these shares exclusively possess all voting power. The
Charter does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors.
Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding shares or series of stock,
holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to receive distributions, when
and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available
therefor. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the
holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive pro rata all assets of the
Company legally available for distribution to its stockholders after payment of,
or adequate provisions for, all known debts and liabilities of the Company. All
shares of Common Stock now outstanding are fully paid and nonassessable, as will
be the shares of Common Stock offered by this Prospectus or any Prospectus
Supplement when issued. The holders of the Common Stock offered hereby will have
no preemptive rights to subscribe to additional stock or securities issued by
the Company at a subsequent date.
RESTRICTIONS ON OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER OF COMMON STOCK
For the Company to qualify as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% of
the value of its outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include
certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year (other than the first
year) or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Shares of
capital stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least
335 days of a taxable year of 12 months (other than the first year) or during a
proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. See "Federal Income Tax
Consequences -- Taxation of the Company -- Requirements for Qualification."
Because the Board of Directors believes it is essential for the Company to
qualify as a REIT, the Charter, subject to certain exceptions, provides that no
holder, other than Robert Batinovich and the individuals or entities whose
ownership of shares of Common Stock is attributed to Mr. Batinovich under the
Code (the "Attributed Owners"), may own an amount of Common Stock in excess of
the Ownership Limitation, which, pursuant to Board action, currently is 9.75% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock. A qualified trust (as defined in the
Charter) generally may own up to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
The Ownership Limitation provides that Robert Batinovich and the Attributed
Owners may hold up to 10.50% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock,
including shares which Robert Batinovich and the Attributed Owners may acquire
pursuant to an option held by GPA, Ltd. or Mr. Batinovich to cause the Company
to redeem their respective partnership interests in the Operating Partnership,
assuming GPA, Ltd. then dissolves and distributes these shares to the partners
of GPA, Ltd.
The Board of Directors may waive the Ownership Limitation if evidence
satisfactory to the Board of Directors and the Company's tax counsel is
presented that such ownership will not jeopardize the Company's status as a
REIT. As a condition to such waiver, the Board of Directors may require opinions
of counsel satisfactory to it and/or an undertaking from the applicant with
respect to preserving the REIT status of the
15
<PAGE> 17
Company. The Ownership Limitation will not apply if the Board of Directors and
the stockholders determine that it is no longer in the best interests of the
Company to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT. Any
transfer of Common Stock that would (a) create actual or constructive ownership
of Common Stock in excess of the Ownership Limitation, (b) result in the Common
Stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons, or (c) result in the Company's
being "closely held" under Section 856(h) of the Code, shall be null and void,
and the intended transferee will acquire no rights to the Common Stock.
The Charter also provides that Common Stock involved in a transfer or
change in capital structure that results in a person (other than Robert
Batinovich and the Attributed Owners) owning in excess of the Ownership
Limitation or would cause the Company to become "closely held" (within the
meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code) will automatically be transferred to a
trustee for the benefit of a charitable organization until purchased by the
Company or sold to a third party without violation of the Ownership Limitation.
While held in trust, the Excess Shares will remain outstanding for purposes of
any stockholder vote or the determination of a quorum for such vote and the
trustee will be empowered to vote the Excess Shares. Excess Shares shall be
entitled to distributions, provided that such distributions shall be paid to a
charitable organization selected by the Board of Directors as beneficiary of the
trust. The trustee may transfer the Excess Shares to any individual (a
"Permitted Transferee") whose ownership of Common Stock would be permitted under
the Ownership Limitation and would not cause the Company to become "closely
held." In addition, the Company would have the right, for a period of 90 days,
to purchase all or any portion of the Excess Shares from the trustee at the
lesser of (i) where (a) the intended transferee gave value for the Excess
Shares, the price paid for the Excess Shares by the intended transferee or (b)
the intended transferee did not give value for the Excess Shares, the price per
share equal to the average of the market price for the Common Stock for the five
consecutive trading days ending on the date of the purported transfer to the
intended transferee and (ii) the average of the closing market price for the
Common Stock for the five consecutive trading days ending the date the Company
exercises its option to purchase. The intended transferee would be entitled to
receive from the trustee the lesser of (i) where (a) the intended transferee
gave value for the Excess Shares, the price paid for the Excess Shares by the
intended transferee or (b) the intended transferee did not give value for the
Excess Shares, the price per share equal to the average of the closing market
price for the Common Stock for the five consecutive trading days ending on the
date of the purported transfer to the intended transferee and (ii) the price per
share received by the trustee from the transfer of the Excess Shares to a
Permitted Transferee.
The Ownership Limitation will not be automatically removed even if the REIT
provisions of the Code are changed so as to no longer contain any ownership
concentration limitation or if the ownership concentration limitation is
increased. Except as otherwise described above, any change in the Ownership
Limitation would require an amendment to the Charter. Such amendments require
the affirmative vote of stockholders owning a majority of the outstanding Common
Stock. In addition to preserving the Company's status as a REIT, the Ownership
Limitation may have the effect of precluding an acquisition of control of the
Company by a third party without the approval of the Board of Directors.
All certificates representing shares of Common Stock will bear a legend
referring to the restrictions described above.
All stockholders of record who own 5% or more of the value of the
outstanding Common Stock (or 1% if there are fewer than 2,000 stockholders of
record but more than 200, or 1/2% if there are 200 or fewer stockholders of
record) must file written notice with the Company containing the information
specified in the Charter by January 30 of each year. In addition, each
stockholder shall upon demand be required to disclose to the Company in writing
such information with respect to the direct, indirect and constructive ownership
of Common Stock as the Board of Directors deems necessary to determine the
effect, if any, of such ownership on the Company's status as a REIT and to
ensure compliance with the Ownership Limitation. The Company intends to use its
best efforts to enforce the Ownership Limitation and will make prohibited
transferees aware of their obligation to pay over any distributions received,
will not give effect on its books to prohibited transfers, will institute
proceedings to enjoin any transfer violating the Ownership Limitation, and will
declare all votes of prohibited transferees invalid.
16
<PAGE> 18
DESCRIPTION OF WARRANTS
The Company has no Warrants outstanding (other than options issued under
the Company's employee stock option plan), as of April 30, 1997. The Company may
issue Warrants for the purchase of Preferred Stock or Common Stock. Warrants may
be issued independently or together with any other Offered Securities offered by
any Prospectus Supplement and may be attached to or separate from such Offered
Securities. Each series of Warrants will be issued under a separate warrant
agreement (each, a "Warrant Agreement") to be entered into between the Company
and a warrant agent specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement (the
"Warrant Agent"). The Warrant Agent will act solely as an agent of the Company
in connection with the Warrants of such series and will not assume any
obligation or relationship of agency or trust for or with any provisions of the
Warrants offered hereby. Further terms of the Warrants and the applicable
Warrant Agreements will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.
The applicable Prospectus Supplement will describe the terms of the
Warrants in respect of which this Prospectus is being delivered, including,
where applicable, the following:
(1) The title of such Warrants;
(2) The aggregate number of such Warrants;
(3) The price or prices at which such Warrants will be issued;
(4) The designation, number of terms of the shares of Preferred Stock
or Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of such Warrants;
(5) The designation and terms of the Offered Securities, if any, with
which such Warrants are issued and the number of such Warrants issued with
each such Offered Security;
(6) The date, if any, on and after which such Warrants and the
related Preferred Stock or Common Stock will be separately transferable;
(7) The price at which each share of Preferred Stock or Common Stock
purchasable upon exercise of such Warrants may be purchased;
(8) The date on which the right to exercise such Warrants shall
commence and the date on which such right shall expire;
(9) The minimum or maximum amount of such Warrants which may be
exercised at any one time;
(10) Information with respect to book-entry procedures, if any;
(11) A discussion of certain federal income tax consequences; and
(12) Any other terms of such Warrants, including terms, procedures and
limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such Warrants.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANY'S CHARTER AND BYLAWS
Certain provisions of the Company's Charter and Bylaws might discourage
certain types of transactions that involve an actual or threatened change in
control of the Company that might involve a premium price for the Company's
capital stock or otherwise be in the best interest of the stockholders. See
"Description of Common Stock -- Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of Common
Stock." The issuance of shares of preferred stock or other capital stock by the
Board of Directors may also have the effect of delaying, depriving or preventing
a change in control of the Company. The Bylaws of the Company contain certain
advance notice requirements in the nomination of persons for election to the
Board of Directors which could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or
other transaction in which holders of some, or a majority, of the Common Stock
might receive a premium for their Common Stock over the prevailing market price,
or which such holders might believe to be otherwise in their best interests.
17
<PAGE> 19
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
GENERAL
The following summary of material federal income tax consequences is based
on current law and does not purport to deal with all aspects of taxation that
may be relevant to particular stockholders in light of their personal investment
or tax circumstances, or to certain types of stockholders (including insurance
companies, financial institutions and broker-dealers) subject to special
treatment under the federal income tax laws.
EACH PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS ADVISED TO CONSULT HIS OWN TAX ADVISOR
REGARDING THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO HIM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND
SALE OF THE OFFERED SECURITIES.
The Company believes that since January 1, 1996, it has operated in a
manner that permits it to satisfy the requirements for taxation as a REIT under
the applicable provisions of the Code. The Company intends to continue to
operate to satisfy such requirements. No assurance can be given, however, that
such requirements will be met.
The sections of the Code relating to qualification and operation as a REIT
are highly technical and complex. The following sets forth the material aspects
of the Code sections that govern the federal income tax treatment of a REIT and
its stockholders. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the applicable
Code provisions, rules and regulations thereunder, and administrative and
judicial interpretations thereof. Morrison & Foerster LLP has acted as tax
counsel to the Company in connection with Company's election to be taxed as a
REIT.
In the opinion of Morrison & Foerster LLP, commencing with the Company's
taxable year that ended on December 31, 1996, the Company has been organized in
conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT, and its method of
operation has and will enable it to continue to meet the requirements for
qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code. It must be emphasized that
this opinion is based on various assumptions and is conditioned upon certain
representations made by the Company as to factual matters. Moreover, such
qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon the Company's ability to meet,
through actual annual operating results, distribution levels and diversity of
stock ownership, and various qualification tests imposed under the Code
discussed below, the results of which will not be reviewed by Morrison &
Foerster LLP. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of
the Company's operations for any particular taxable year will satisfy such
requirements. See "-- Failure to Qualify."
In brief, if certain detailed conditions imposed by the REIT provisions of
the Code are satisfied, entities, such as the Company, that invest primarily in
real estate and that otherwise would be treated for federal income tax purposes
as corporations, are generally not taxed at the corporate level on their "REIT
Taxable Income" that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment
substantially eliminates the "double taxation" (i.e., taxation at both the
corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from the use of
corporate investment vehicles.
If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any year, however, it will be
subject to federal income tax as if it were a domestic corporation, and its
stockholders will be taxed in the same manner as stockholders of ordinary
corporations. In this event, the Company could be subject to potentially
significant tax liabilities and the amount of cash available for distribution to
its stockholders could be reduced.
TAXATION OF THE COMPANY
General
In any year in which the Company qualifies as a REIT, in general, it will
not be subject to federal income tax on that portion of its net income that it
distributes to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the "double
taxation" on income at the corporate and stockholder levels that generally
results from investment in a corporation. However, the Company will be subject
to federal income tax as follows: First, the Company will be taxed at regular
corporate rates on any undistributed REIT Taxable Income, including
undistributed net capital gains. Second, under certain circumstances, the
Company may be subject to the "alternative minimum tax" on its items of tax
preference. Third, if the Company has (i) net income from the sale or other
18
<PAGE> 20
disposition of "foreclosure property" which is held primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of business or (ii) other nonqualifying income
from foreclosure property, it will be subject to tax at the highest corporate
rate on such income. Fourth, if the Company has net income from "prohibited
transactions" (which are, in general, certain sales or other dispositions of
property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business
other than foreclosure property), such income will be subject to a 100% tax.
Fifth, if the Company should fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the
95% gross income test (as discussed below), and has nonetheless maintained its
qualification as a REIT because certain other requirements have been met, it
will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the gross income
attributable to the greater of the amount by which the Company fails the 75%
gross income test or the 95% gross income test, multiplied by (b) a fraction
intended to reflect the Company's profitability. Sixth, if the Company should
fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of its
real estate investment trust ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of its real
estate investment trust capital gain net income for such year, and (iii) any
undistributed taxable income from prior periods, the Company would be subject to
a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts
actually distributed. Seventh, if the Company acquires any asset from a C
corporation (i.e., generally a corporation subject to full corporate-level tax)
in a transaction in which the basis of the asset in the Company's hands is
determined by reference to the basis of the asset (or any other property) in the
hands of the C corporation, and the Company recognizes gain on the disposition
of such asset during the 10 year period beginning on the date on which such
asset was acquired by the Company, then, to the extent of any built-in gain at
the time of acquisition, such gain will be subject to tax at the highest regular
corporate rate.
Requirements for Qualification
The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association (1) which is
managed by one or more trustees or directors; (2) the beneficial ownership of
which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of
beneficial interest; (3) which would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but
for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code; (4) which is neither a financial
institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code;
(5) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons; (6) not
more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code) at any time
during the last half of each taxable year; and (7) which meets certain other
tests, described below, regarding the nature of income and assets. The Code
provides that conditions (1) to (4), inclusive, must be met during the entire
taxable year and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a
taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of
less than 12 months. Conditions (5) and (6) will not apply until after the first
taxable year for which an election is made by the Company to be taxed as a REIT.
In order to assist the Company in complying with the ownership tests
described above, the Company has placed certain restrictions on the transfer of
the Common Stock and the Company's preferred stock to prevent further
concentration of stock ownership. Moreover, to evidence compliance with these
requirements, the Company must maintain records which disclose the actual
ownership of its outstanding Common Stock and preferred stock. In fulfilling its
obligations to maintain records, the Company must and will demand written
statements each year from the record holders of designated percentages of its
Common Stock and preferred stock disclosing the actual owners of such Common
Stock and preferred stock. A list of those persons failing or refusing to comply
with such demand must be maintained as part of the Company's records. A
stockholder failing or refusing to comply with the Company's written demand must
submit with his or her tax returns a similar statement disclosing the actual
ownership of Common Stock and preferred stock and certain other information. In
addition, the Company's Charter provides restrictions regarding the transfer of
its shares that are intended to assist the Company in continuing to satisfy the
share ownership requirements. See "Description of Common Stock -- Restrictions
on Ownership and Transfer of Common Stock."
In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, Treasury
Regulations provide that the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share
of the assets of the partnership and will be deemed to be entitled to the income
of the partnership attributable to such share. In addition, the character of the
assets and gross income of the partnership shall retain the same character in
the hands of the REIT for purposes of
19
<PAGE> 21
Section 856 of the Code, including satisfying the gross income tests and the
asset tests, described below. Thus, the Company's proportionate share of the
assets, liabilities and items of income of the Operating Partnership will be
treated as assets, liabilities and items of income of the Company for purposes
of applying the requirements described below.
Asset Tests
At the close of each quarter of the Company's taxable year, the Company
must satisfy two tests relating to the nature of its assets. First, at least 75%
of the value of the Company's total assets must be represented by interests in
real property, interests in mortgages on real property, shares in other REITs,
cash, cash items and government securities (as well as certain temporary
investments in stock or debt instruments purchased with the proceeds of new
capital raised by the Company). Second, although the remaining 25% of the
Company's assets generally may be invested without restriction, securities in
this class may not exceed either (i) 5% of the value of the Company's total
assets as to any one non-government issuer or (ii) 10% of the outstanding voting
securities of any one issuer. The Company's investment in real property through
its interest in the Operating Partnership constitutes qualified assets for
purposes of the 75% asset test. In addition, the Company may own 100% of
"qualified REIT subsidiaries" as defined in the Code. All assets, liabilities,
and items of income, deduction, and credit of such a qualified REIT subsidiary
will be treated as owned and realized directly by the Company.
The Company has analyzed the impact of its ownership interests in the
Associated Companies on its ability to satisfy the asset tests. Based upon its
analysis of the estimated value of the Company's total assets as well as its
estimate of the value of the respective nonvoting preferred stock interests in
the Associated Companies, the Company believes that none of such preferred stock
interests will exceed 5% of the value of the Company's total assets on the last
day of any calendar quarter in 1996. The Company intends to monitor compliance
with the 5% test on a quarterly basis and believes that it will be able to
manage its operations in a manner to comply with the tests, either by managing
the amount of its qualifying assets or reducing its interests in the Associated
Companies, although there can be no assurance that such steps will be
successful. In rendering its opinion as to the qualification of the Company as a
REIT, counsel has relied upon the Company's representation as to the value of
its assets and the value of its interests in the Associated Companies. Counsel
has discussed with the Company its valuation analysis and the future actions
available to it to comply with the 5% tests but it has not independently
verified the valuations.
Gross Income Tests
There are three separate percentage tests relating to the sources of the
Company's gross income which must be satisfied for each taxable year. For
purposes of these tests, where the Company invests in a partnership, the Company
will be treated as receiving its share of the income and loss of the
partnership, and the gross income of the partnership will retain the same
character in the hands of the Company as it has in the hands of the partnership.
See "-- Tax Aspects of the Company's Investment in the Operating Partnerships --
General."
The 75% Test. At least 75% of the Company's gross income for the taxable
year must be "qualifying income." Qualifying income generally includes (i)
"rents from real property" (except as modified below); (ii) interest on
obligations collateralized by mortgages on, or interests in, real property;
(iii) gains from the sale or other disposition of interests in real property and
real estate mortgages, other than gain from property held primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of the Company's trade or business ("dealer
property"); (iv) dividends or other distributions on shares in other REITs, as
well as gain from the sale of such shares; (v) abatements and refunds of real
property taxes; (vi) income from the operation, and gain from the sale, of
property acquired at or in lieu of a foreclosure of the mortgage collateralized
by such property ("foreclosure property"); and (vii) commitment fees received
for agreeing to make loans collateralized by mortgages on real property or to
purchase or lease real property.
Rents received from a tenant will not, however, qualify as rents from real
property in satisfying the 75% test (or the 95% gross income test described
below) if the Company, or an owner of 10% or more of the
20
<PAGE> 22
Company, directly or constructively owns 10% or more of such tenant (a "related
party tenant"). In addition, if rent attributable to personal property, leased
in connection with a lease of real property, is greater than 15% of the total
rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to such
personal property will not qualify as rents from real property. Moreover, an
amount received or accrued generally will not qualify as rents from real
property (or as interest income) for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income
tests if it is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person.
Rent or interest will not be disqualified, however, solely by reason of being
based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales. Finally, for
rents received to qualify as rents from real property, the Company generally
must not operate or manage the property or furnish or render services to
tenants, other than through an "independent contractor" from whom the Company
derives no revenue. The "independent contractor" requirement, however, does not
apply to the extent that the services provided by the Company are "usually or
customarily rendered" in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only,
and are not otherwise considered "rendered to the occupant."
The Company will be deemed to provide certain services which are actually
provided by the Operating Partnership with respect to properties owned by the
Operating Partnership. The Company believes that the services provided by the
Operating Partnership are usually or customarily rendered in connection with the
rental of space of occupancy only, and therefore that the provision of such
services will not cause the rents received with respect to its properties to
fail to qualify as rents from real property for purposes of the 75% and 95%
gross income tests. The Company does not intend to rent to related party tenants
or to charge rents that would not qualify as rents from real property because
the rents are based on the income or profits of any person (other than rents
that are based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales).
Pursuant to the percentage leases ("Percentage Leases"), GHG leases from
the Operating Partnership the land, buildings, improvements, furnishings, and
equipment comprising the Hotels for a five-year period with a five-year renewal
option. The Percentage Leases provide that the lessee will be obligated to pay
to the Operating Partnership (a) the greater of a fixed rent (the "Base Rent")
or a percentage rent (the "Percentage Rent") (collectively, the "Rents") and (b)
certain other amounts, including interest accrued on any late payments or
charges (the "Additional Charges"). The Percentage Rent is calculated by
multiplying fixed percentages by the gross revenues from the operations of the
Hotels in excess of certain levels. The Base Rent accrues and is required to be
paid monthly. Percentage Rent is due quarterly; however, the lessee will not be
in default for non-payment of Percentage Rent due in any calendar year if the
lessee pays, within 90 days of the end of the calendar year, the excess of
Percentage Rent due and unpaid over the Base Rent with respect to such year.
In order for the Base Rent, the Percentage Rent, and the Additional Charges
to constitute rents from real property, the Percentage Leases must be respected
as true leases for federal income tax purposes and not treated as service
contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. The determination
of whether the Percentage Leases are true leases depends on an analysis of all
the surrounding facts and circumstances. In making such a determination, courts
have considered a variety of factors, including the following: (a) the intent of
the parties, (b) the form of the agreement, (c) the degree of control over the
property that is retained by the property owner (e.g., whether the lessee has
substantial control over the operation of the property or whether the lessee was
required simply to use its best efforts to perform its obligations under the
agreement), and (d) the extent to which the property owner retains the risk of
loss of the property (e.g., whether the lessee bears the risk of increases in
operating expenses or the risk of damage to the property).
In addition, Section 7701(e) of the Code provides that a contract that
purports to be a service contract (or a partnership agreement) is treated
instead as a lease of property if the contract is properly treated as such,
taking into account all relevant factors, including whether or not: (a) the
service recipient is in physical possession of the property, (b) the service
recipient controls the property, (c) the service recipient has a significant
economic or possessory interest in the property (e.g., the property's use is
likely to be dedicated to the service recipient for a substantial portion of the
useful life of the property, the recipient shares the risk that the property
will decline in value, the recipient shares in any appreciation in the value of
the property, the recipient shares in savings in the property's operating costs,
or the recipient bears the risk of damage to or loss of the property), (d) the
service provider does not bear any risk of substantially diminished receipts or
substantially increased expenditures if there is nonperformance under the
contract, (e) the service provider
21
<PAGE> 23
does not use the property concurrently to provide significant services to
entities unrelated to the service recipient, and (f) the total contract price
does not substantially exceed the rental value of the property for the contract
period. Since the determination of whether a service contract should be treated
as a lease is inherently factual, the presence or absence of any single factor
may not be dispositive in every case.
Counsel is of the opinion that the Percentage Leases will be treated as
true leases for federal income tax purposes. Such opinion is based, in part, on
the following facts: (a) the Operating Partnership and the lessee intend for
their relationship to be that of a lessor and lessee and such relationship will
be documented by lease agreements, (b) the lessee has the right to exclusive
possession and use and quiet enjoyment of the Hotels during the term of the
Percentage Leases, (c) the lessee bears the cost of, and will be responsible
for, day-to-day maintenance and repair of the Hotels, other than the cost of
maintaining underground utilities, structural elements and exterior painting,
and will dictate how the Hotels are operated, maintained, and improved, (d) the
lessee bears all of the costs and expenses of operating the Hotels (including
inventory costs) during the term of the Percentage Leases (other than real
property taxes, personal property taxes on property owned by the Operating
Partnership, casualty insurance and the cost of replacement or refurbishment of
furniture, fixtures and equipment, to the extent such costs do not exceed the
allowance for such costs provided by the Operating Partnership under the
Percentage Leases), (e) the lessee will benefit from any savings in the costs of
operating the Hotels during the term of the Percentage Leases, (f) in the event
of damage or destruction to a Hotel which renders the Hotel unsuitable for
continued use, the lessee will be at economic risk because the Operating
Partnership can elect to terminate the Percentage Lease as to such Hotel, in
which event the lessee can elect to rebuild at its cost less any insurance
proceeds, or accept such termination, (g) the lessee will indemnify the
Partnership against all liabilities imposed on the Partnership during the term
of the Percentage Leases by reason of (i) injury to persons or damage to
property occurring at the Hotels or (ii) the lessee's use, management,
maintenance or repair of the Hotels, (h) the lessee is obligated to pay
substantial fixed rent for the period of use of the Hotels, and (i) the lessee
stands to incur substantial losses (or reap substantial gains) depending on how
successfully it operates the Hotels. The Company has represented that the lessee
has and will have its own employees, physically distinct and separate office
space, furniture and equipment, and directors. Further, the Company has
represented that neither the Company nor the Operating Partnership will furnish
or render services to either the lessee or its customers.
Investors should be aware that there are no controlling Treasury
Regulations, published rulings, or judicial decisions involving leases with
terms substantially the same as the Percentage Leases that discuss whether such
leases constitute true leases for federal income tax purposes. Therefore, the
opinion of counsel with respect to the relationship between the Operating
Partnership and the lessee is based upon all of the facts and circumstances, and
rulings and judicial decisions involving situations that are considered to be
analogous. Opinions of counsel are not binding upon the Service or any court,
and there can be no assurance that the Service will not assert successfully a
contrary position. If the Percentage Leases are recharacterized as service
contracts or partnership agreements, rather than true leases, part or all of the
payments that the Partnership receives from the lessee may not be considered
rent or may not otherwise satisfy the various requirements for qualification as
rents from real property. In that case, the Company likely would not be able to
satisfy either the 75% or 95% gross income tests and, as a result, could lose
its REIT status.
In order for the Rents to constitute rents from real property, several
other requirements also must be satisfied. One requirement is that the Rents
attributable to personal property leased in connection with the lease of the
real property comprising a Hotel must not be greater than 15% of the Rents
received under the Percentage Lease. The Rents attributable to the personal
property in a Hotel is the amount that bears the same ratio to total rent for
the taxable year as the average of the adjusted bases of the personal property
in the Hotel at the beginning and at the end of the taxable year bears to the
average of the aggregate adjusted bases of both the real and personal property
comprising the Hotel at the beginning and at the end of such taxable year (the
"Adjusted Basis Ratio"). Management has obtained an appraisal of the personal
property at each Hotel indicating that the appraised value of the personal
property at each Hotel is less than 15% of the value at which such Hotel is
acquired. However, the Company has represented that the Operating Partnership
will in no event acquire additional personal property for a Hotel to the extent
that such acquisition would cause the Adjusted Basis Ratio for that Hotel to
exceed 15%. There can be no assurance, however, that the Service
22
<PAGE> 24
would not assert that the personal property acquired from a particular
partnership had a value in excess of the appraised value, or that a court would
not uphold such assertion. If such a challenge were successfully asserted, the
Company could fail the 15% Adjusted Basis Ratio as to one or more of the
Percentage Leases, which in turn potentially could cause it to fail to satisfy
the 95% or 75% gross income test and thus could lose its REIT status.
Another requirement for qualification of the Rents as rents from real
property is that the Percentage Rent must not be based in whole or in part on
the income or profits of any person. The Percentage Rent, however, will qualify
as rents from real property if it is based on percentages of receipts or sales
and the percentages (a) are fixed at the time the Percentage Leases are entered
into, (b) are not renegotiated during the term of the Percentage Leases in a
manner that has the effect of basing Percentage Rent on income or profits, and
(c) conform with normal business practice. More generally, the Percentage Rent
will not qualify as rents from real property if, considering the Percentage
Leases and all the surrounding circumstances, the arrangement does not conform
with normal business practice, but is in reality used as a means of basing the
Percentage Rent on income or profits. Since the Percentage Rent is based on
fixed percentages of the gross revenues from the Hotels that are established in
the Percentage Leases, and the Company has represented that the percentages (i)
will not be renegotiated during the terms of the Percentage Leases in a manner
that has the effect of basing the Percentage Rent on income or profit and (ii)
conform with normal business practice, the Percentage Rent should not be
considered based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person.
Furthermore, the Company has represented that, with respect to other hotel
properties that it acquires in the future, it will not charge rent for any
property that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any
person (except by reason of being based on a fixed percentage of gross revenue,
as described above).
A further requirement for qualification of Rents as rents from real
property limits the relationship between the Company and its tenants. In the
case of a corporate tenant, the Company must not own 10% or more of the total
combined voting power of the tenant's stock and must not own 10% or more of the
total number of shares of all classes of the tenant's stock outstanding. In the
case of a tenant that is not a corporation, the Company must not own 10% or more
in interest of the tenant's assets or net profits. The Company intends to limit
its ownership interest in GHG to nonvoting preferred stock, which constitutes
less than 10% of the total number of outstanding shares of GHG stock. The common
stock of GHG, which is the only voting stock of GHG, is owned by persons who are
not related to the Company within the definition in the applicable statute. The
common stockholders have a significant economic interest in GHG and elect the
board of directors of GHG. Based upon the foregoing, counsel is of the opinion
that rental payments from GHG will not constitute rent from a party related to
the Company.
The Company will receive nonqualifying management fee income. As a result,
the Company may approach the income test limits and could be at risk of not
satisfying such tests and thus not qualifying as a REIT. Counsel's opinion is
based on the Company's representation that the actual amount of nonqualifying
income will not exceed such limits.
The 95% Test. In addition to deriving 75% of its gross income from the
sources listed above, at least 95% of the Company's gross income for the taxable
year must be derived from the above-described qualifying income, or from
dividends, interest or gains from the sale or disposition of stock or other
securities that are not dealer property. Dividends and interest on any
obligation not collateralized by an interest on real property are included for
purposes of the 95% test, but not for purposes of the 75% test. For purposes of
determining whether the Company complies with the 75% and 95% income tests,
gross income does not include income from prohibited transactions. A "prohibited
transaction" is a sale of dealer property, excluding certain property held by
the Company for at least four years and foreclosure property. See "-- Taxation
of the Company" and "-- Tax Aspects of the Company's Investment in the Operating
Partnership -- Sale of Properties."
The Company believes that it and the Operating Partnership has held and
managed its properties in a manner that has given rise to rental income
qualifying under the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Gains on sales of
properties will generally qualify under the 75% and 95% gross income tests.
23
<PAGE> 25
Even if the Company fails to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross
income tests for any taxable year, it may still qualify as a REIT for such year
if it is entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code. These relief
provisions will generally be available if: (i) the Company's failure to comply
was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect; (ii) the Company reports
the nature and amount of each item of its income included in the 75% and 95%
gross income tests on a schedule attached to its tax return; and (iii) any
incorrect information on this schedule is not due to fraud with intent to evade
tax. It is not possible, however, to state whether in all circumstances the
Company would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. If these
relief provisions apply, the Company will, however, still be subject to a
special tax upon the greater of the amount by which it fails either the 75% or
95% gross income test for that year.
The 30% Test. The Company must derive less than 30% of its gross income for
each taxable year from the sale or other disposition of (i) real property held
for less than four years (other than foreclosure property and involuntary
conversions), (ii) stock or securities held for less than one year, and (iii)
property in a "prohibited transaction." In this regard, certain of the Company's
assets are subject to existing purchase options. Although the Company believes,
based on the historical experience of certain predecessor partnerships, that it
will satisfy this 30% test, if, contrary to expectations, large numbers of such
options are exercised, more than 30% of the Company's gross income in a taxable
year could be derived from a proscribed source. The Company will, however, use
its best efforts to ensure that it will continue to satisfy each of the
foregoing income requirements.
ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS
The Company, in order to qualify as a REIT, is required to make
distributions (other than capital gain distributions) to its stockholders each
year in an amount at least equal to (A) the sum of (i) 95% of the Company's REIT
Taxable Income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and the
REIT's net capital gain) and (ii) 95% of the net income (after tax), if any,
from foreclosure property, minus (B) the sum of certain items of non-cash
income. Such distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they
relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before the Company timely
files its tax return for such year and if paid on or before the first regular
distribution payment after such declaration. To the extent that the Company does
not distribute all of its net capital gain or distributes at least 95%, but less
than 100%, of its REIT Taxable Income, as adjusted, it will be subject to tax on
the undistributed amount at regular capital gains or ordinary corporate tax
rates, as the case may be. Furthermore, if the REIT should fail to distribute
during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of its REIT ordinary
income for such year, (ii) 95% of its REIT capital gain income for such year,
and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, the REIT would be
subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the
amounts actually distributed. For such purposes, dividends declared to
shareholders of record in October, November, or December of one calendar year
and paid by January 31 of the following calendar year are deemed paid as of
December 31 of the initial calendar year.
The Company believes that it has made and will make timely distributions
sufficient to satisfy the annual distribution requirements. In this regard, the
partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership authorizes the Company, as
general partner, to take such steps as may be necessary to cause the Operating
Partnership to distribute to its partners an amount sufficient to permit the
Company to meet these distribution requirements. It is possible that in the
future the Company may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet
the 95% distribution requirement, due to timing differences between the actual
receipt of income and actual payment of expenses on the one hand, and the
inclusion of such income and deduction of such expenses in computing the
Company's REIT taxable income on the other hand. Further, as described below, it
is possible that, from time to time, the Company may be allocated a share of
taxable income attributable to the sale of depreciated property that exceeds its
allocable share of cash attributable to that sale. To avoid any problem with the
95% distribution requirement, the Company will closely monitor the relationship
between its REIT Taxable Income and cash flow and, if necessary, will borrow
funds (or cause the Operating Partnership or other affiliates to borrow funds)
in order to satisfy the distribution requirement. The Company (through the
Operating Partnership) may be required to borrow funds at times when market
conditions are not favorable.
24
<PAGE> 26
If the Company fails to meet the 95% distribution requirement as a result
of an adjustment to the Company's tax return by the Service, the Company may
retroactively cure the failure by paying a "deficiency dividend" (plus
applicable penalties and interest) within a specified period.
FAILURE TO QUALIFY
If the Company fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year
and the relief provisions do not apply, the Company will be subject to tax
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at
regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which the
Company fails to qualify will not be deductible by the Company, nor will they be
required to be made. In such event, to the extent of the Company's current and
accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions to stockholders will be
taxable as ordinary income, and, subject to certain limitations in the Code,
corporate distributees may be eligible for the dividends-received deduction.
Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, the Company will
also be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years
following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to
state whether the Company would be entitled to such statutory relief. Under
certain legislative proposals, if enacted, the Company will also be effectively
precluded from re-electing REIT status following a termination of its REIT
qualification. See " Possible Legislative or Other Actions Affecting Tax
Consequences."
TAX ASPECTS OF THE COMPANY'S INVESTMENT IN THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
The following discussion summarizes certain federal income tax
considerations applicable solely to the Company's investment in the Operating
Partnership.
General
The Company holds a direct ownership interest in the Operating Partnership.
In general, partnerships are "pass-through" entities which are not subject to
federal income tax. Rather, partners are allocated their proportionate shares of
the items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of a partnership, and are
potentially subject to tax thereon, without regard to whether the partners
receive a distribution from the partnership. The Company includes its
proportionate share of the foregoing Operating Partnership items for purposes of
the various REIT income tests and in the computation of its REIT Taxable Income.
See "-- Requirements for Qualification" and "-- Gross Income Tests." Any
resultant increase in the Company's REIT Taxable Income increases its
distribution requirements (see "-- Requirements for Qualification" and
"-- Annual Distribution Requirements"), but is not subject to federal income tax
in the hands of the Company provided that such income is distributed by the
Company to its stockholders. Moreover, for purposes of the REIT asset tests (see
"-- Requirements for Qualification" and "-- Asset Tests"), the Company includes
its proportionate share of assets held by the Operating Partnership.
Tax Allocations with Respect to Certain Properties
Pursuant to Section 704(c) of the Code, income, gain, loss and deduction
attributable to appreciated or depreciated property that is contributed to a
partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership, must be allocated in
a manner such that the contributing partner is charged with, or benefits from,
respectively, the unrealized gain or unrealized loss associated with the
property at the time of the contribution. The amount of such unrealized gain or
unrealized loss is generally equal to the difference between the fair market
value of contributed property at the time of contribution and the adjusted tax
basis of such property at the time of contribution (a "Book-Tax Difference").
Such allocations are solely for federal income tax purposes and do not affect
the book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among the
partners. The Operating Partnership was formed by way of contributions of
appreciated property. Consequently, the partnership agreement of the Operating
Partnership requires such allocations to be made in a manner consistent with
Section 704(c) of the Code.
In general, the limited partners of the Operating Partnership will be
allocated lower amounts of depreciation deductions for tax purposes and
increased taxable income and gain on sale by the Operating
25
<PAGE> 27
Partnership of the contributed assets. This will tend to eliminate the Book-Tax
Difference over the life of the Operating Partnership. However, the special
allocation rules under Section 704(c) do not always entirely rectify the
Book-Tax Difference on an annual basis or with respect to a specific taxable
transaction such as a sale. Thus, the carryover basis of the contributed assets
in the hands of the Operating Partnership may cause the company to be allocated
lower depreciation and other deductions, and possibly greater amounts of taxable
income in the event of a sale of such contributed assets in excess of the
economic or book income allocated to it as a result of such sale. This may cause
the Company to recognize taxable income in excess of cash proceeds, which might
adversely affect the Company's ability to comply with the REIT distribution
requirements. See "-- Requirements for Qualification" and "-- Annual
Distribution Requirements." In addition, the application of Section 704(c) to
the Operating Partnership is not entirely clear and may be affected by authority
that may be promulgated in the future.
Basis in Operating Partnership Interest
The Company's adjusted tax basis in its partnership interest in the
Operating Partnership generally (i) is equal to the amount of cash and the basis
of any other property contributed to the Operating Partnership by the Company,
(ii) is increased by (a) its allocable share of the Operating Partnership's
income and (b) increases in its allocable share of indebtedness of the Operating
Partnership and (iii) is reduced, but not below zero, by the Company's allocable
share of (a) the Operating Partnership's losses and (b) the amount of cash
distributed to the Company, and by constructive distributions resulting from a
reduction in the Company's share of indebtedness of the Operating Partnership.
If the allocation of the Company's distributive share of the Operating
Partnership's losses would reduce the adjusted tax basis of the Company's
partnership interest in the Operating Partnership below zero, the recognition of
such losses will be deferred until such time as the recognition of such loss
would not reduce the Company's adjusted tax basis below zero. To the extent that
the Operating Partnership's distributions, or any decrease in the Company's
share of the indebtedness of the Operating Partnership (each such decrease being
considered a constructive cash distribution to the partners), would reduce the
Company's adjusted tax basis below zero, such distributions (including such
constructive distributions) constitute taxable income to the Company. Such
distributions and constructive distributions will normally be characterized as a
capital gain, and if the Company's partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership has been held for longer than the long-term capital gain holding
period (currently one year), the distributions and constructive distributions
will constitute long-term capital gains.
Sale of Properties
Generally, any gain realized by the Operating Partnership on the sale of
property held by the Operating Partnership for more than one year will be
long-term capital gain, except for any portion of such gain that is treated as
depreciation or cost recovery recapture. The Company's share of any gain
realized by the Operating Partnership on the sale of any dealer property
generally will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is
subject to a 100% penalty tax. See "Taxation of the Company" and
"-- Requirements for Qualification" and "-- Gross Income Tests -- The 95% Test."
Under existing law, whether property is dealer property is a question of fact
that depends on all the facts and circumstances with respect to the particular
transaction. The Operating Partnership intends to hold its properties for
investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of
acquiring, developing, owning and operating its properties, and to make such
occasional sales of properties as are consistent with the Company's investment
objectives. Based upon such investment objectives, the Company believes that in
general the Operating Partnership's properties should not be considered dealer
property and that the amount of income from prohibited transactions, if any,
will not be material.
26
<PAGE> 28
TAXATION OF STOCKHOLDERS
Taxation of Taxable Domestic Stockholders
As long as the Company qualifies as a REIT, distributions made to the
Company's taxable domestic stockholders out of current or accumulated earnings
and profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends) will be taken into
account by them as ordinary income. Stockholders that are corporations will not
be entitled to a dividends-received deduction with respect to any distributions
from the Company. Distributions that are designated as capital gain dividends
will be taxed as long-term capital gains (to the extent they do not exceed the
Company's actual net capital gain for the taxable year) without regard to the
period for which the stockholder has held its stock. However, corporate
stockholders may be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain
dividends as ordinary income. To the extent that the Company makes distributions
in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, these distributions
are treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the stockholder, reducing
the tax basis of a stockholder's shares of Company stock by the amount of such
distribution (but not below zero), with distributions in excess of the
stockholder's tax basis taxable as capital gains (if the shares of Company stock
are held as a capital asset). In addition, any dividend declared by the Company
in October, November or December of any year and payable to a stockholder of
record on a specific date in any such month shall be treated as both paid by the
Company and received by the stockholder on December 31 of such year, provided
that the dividend is actually paid by the Company during January of the
following calendar year. Stockholders may not include in their own income tax
returns any net operating losses or capital losses of the Company.
In general, any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares of Company stock by
a stockholder who has held such stock for six months or less (after applying
certain holding period rules) will be treated as a long-term capital loss, to
the extent of distributions from the Company required to be treated by such
stockholder as long-term capital gains.
Backup Withholding
The Company will report to its domestic stockholders and to the Service the
amount of dividends paid during each calendar year, and the amount of tax
withheld, if any, with respect thereto. Under the backup withholding rules, a
stockholder may be subject to backup withholding at the rate of 31% with respect
to dividends paid and redemption proceeds unless such stockholder (a) is a
corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates this fact, or (b) provides a taxpayer identification number,
certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding, and otherwise
complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company will institute backup withholding
with respect to a stockholder if advised do so by the Service. A stockholder
that does not provide the Company with a correct taxpayer identification number
may also be subject to penalties imposed by the Service. Any amount paid as
backup withholding will be creditable against the stockholder's income tax
liability.
Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders
The IRS has issued a revenue ruling in which it held that amounts
distributed by a REIT to a tax-exempt employees' pension trust do not constitute
unrelated business taxable income ("UBTI"). Revenue rulings, however, are
interpretive in nature and are subject to revocation or modification by the
Service. Based upon the ruling and the analysis therein, distributions by the
Company to a stockholder that is a tax-exempt entity should not constitute UBTI,
provided that the tax exempt entity has not financed the acquisition of its
shares of Company stock with "acquisition indebtedness" within the meaning of
the Code, and that the shares of the Company stock are not otherwise used in an
unrelated trade or business of the tax-exempt entity. In addition, REITs
generally treat the beneficiaries of qualified pension trusts as the beneficial
owners of REIT shares owned by such pension trusts for purposes of determining
if more than 50% of the REIT's shares are owned by five or fewer individuals.
However, if a pension trust owns more than 10% of the REIT's shares, it can be
subject to UBTI on all or a portion of REIT dividends made to it, if the REIT is
treated as a "pension-held REIT." In view of the Ownership Limitation, the
Company does not expect to be treated as a "pension-held
27
<PAGE> 29
REIT." Consequently, a pension trust stockholder should not be subject to UBTI
on dividends that it receives from the Company. However, because the Common
Stock is publicly traded, no assurance can be given to this effect.
Taxation of Foreign Stockholders
The rules governing United States federal income taxation of nonresident
alien individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships and other foreign
stockholders are complex and no attempt is made herein to provide more than a
summary of such rules. Prospective foreign investors ("Non-U.S. Stockholders")
should consult with their own tax advisors to determine the impact of federal,
state, local and any foreign income tax laws with regard to an investment in the
Company, including any reporting requirements.
Distributions that are not attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by
the Company or the Operating Partnership of "United States real property
interests" ("USRPIs"), as defined in the Code, and not designated by the Company
as capital gains dividends will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to
the extent they are made out of current or accumulated earnings and profits of
the Company. Such distributions will ordinarily be subject to a tax equal to 30%
of the gross amount of the distribution unless an applicable tax treaty reduces
or eliminates that tax. However, if income from the investment in the shares is
treated as effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Stockholder's conduct of a
United States trade or business (or, if an income tax treaty applies, is
attributable to a United States permanent establishment of the Non-U.S.
Stockholder), the Non-U.S. Stockholder generally will be subject to a tax at
graduated rates, in the same manner as U.S. stockholders are taxed with respect
to such distributions (and may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax in
the case of a stockholder that is a foreign corporation). The Company expects to
withhold United States income tax at the rate of 30% on the gross amount of any
distributions of ordinary income made to a Non-U.S. Stockholder unless (i) a
lower treaty rate applies and proper certification is provided or (ii) the
Non-U.S. Stockholder files an IRS Form 4224 with the Company claiming that the
distribution is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Stockholder's conduct of
a United States trade or business (or, if an income tax treaty applies, is
attributable to a United States permanent establishment of the Non-U.S.
Stockholder). Pursuant to current Treasury Regulations, dividends paid to an
address in a country outside the United States are generally presumed to be paid
to a resident of such country for purposes of ascertaining the requirement of
withholding discussed above and the applicability of a tax treaty rate. Under
proposed Treasury Regulations, not currently in effect, however, a Non-U.S.
Stockholder who seeks to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate would be
required to satisfy certain certification and other requirements.
Unless Company stock constitutes a USRPI, distributions in excess of
current and accumulated earnings and profits of the Company will not be taxable
to a stockholder to the extent that such distributions do not exceed the
adjusted basis of the stockholder's shares but rather will reduce the adjusted
basis of such shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted
basis of a Non-U.S. Stockholder's shares of Company stock, such distributions
will give rise to tax liability if the Non-U.S. Stockholder would otherwise be
subject to tax on any gain from the sale or disposition of his shares, as
described below. If it cannot be determined at the time a distribution is made
whether or not such distribution will be in excess of current and accumulated
earnings and profits, the distributions will be subject to withholding at the
same rate as dividends. If, however, shares of Company stock are treated as a
USRPI, then unless otherwise treated as a dividend for withholding tax purposes
as described below, any distributions in excess of current or accumulated
earnings and profits will be subject to 10% withholding and, to the extent such
distributions also exceed the adjusted basis of a Non-U.S. Stockholder's shares,
they will also give rise to gain from the sale or exchange of the shares, the
tax treatment of which is described below. Amounts withheld may be refundable if
it is subsequently determined that such amounts are in excess of the Non-U.S.
Stockholder's U.S. tax liability.
Distributions that are designated by the Company at the time of
distribution as capital gain dividends (other than those arising from the
disposition of a USRPI) generally will not be subject to taxation, unless (i)
investment in the shares is effectively connected with the Non-U.S.
Stockholder's United States trade or business (or, if an income tax treaty
applies, it is attributable to a United States permanent establishment of the
Non-U.S. Stockholder), in which case the Non-U.S. Stockholder will be subject to
the same treatment as U.S. stockholders with respect to such gain (except that a
stockholder that is a foreign corporation may also
28
<PAGE> 30
be subject to the 30% branch profits tax), or (ii) the Non-U.S. Stockholder is a
non-resident alien individual whose is present in the United States for 183 days
or more during the taxable year and either has a "tax home" in the United States
or sold his or her shares under circumstances in which the sale was attributable
to a U.S. office, in which case the non-resident alien individual will be
subject to a 30% tax on the individual's capital gains.
For any year in which the Company qualifies as a REIT, distributions that
are attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by the Company of USRPIs will
be taxed to a Non-U.S. Stockholder under the provisions of the Foreign
Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 ("FIRPTA"). Under FIRPTA,
distributions attributable to gain from sales of USRPIs are taxed to a Non-U.S.
Stockholder as gain effectively connected with a United States trade or
business. Non-U.S. Stockholders would thus be taxed at the normal capital gain
rates applicable to U.S. stockholders (subject to applicable alternative minimum
tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien
individuals). Also, distributions subject to FIRPTA may be subject to a 30%
branch profits tax in the hands of a foreign corporate stockholder not entitled
to treaty exemption or rate reduction. The Company is required by applicable
Treasury Regulations to withhold 35% of any distribution that could be
designated by the Company as a USRPI capital gains dividend. This amount may be
creditable against the Non-U.S. Stockholder's FIRPTA tax liability.
Gain recognized by a Non-U.S. Stockholder upon a sale of shares of Company
stock will generally not be taxed under FIRPTA if the shares do not constitute a
USRPI. Shares of the Company will not be considered a USRPI if the Company is a
"domestically controlled REIT," or if the shares are part of a class of stock
that is regularly traded on an established securities market and the holder
owned less 5% of the class of stock sold during a specified testing period. A
"domestically controlled REIT" is defined generally as a REIT in which at all
times during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of the stock was
held directly or indirectly by foreign persons. The Company believes that it is
a "domestically controlled REIT," and therefore the sale of shares will not be
subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, since the Company's Common Stock is
publicly traded, no assurance can be given to this effect. If the gain on the
sale of shares were to be subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the Non-U.S.
Stockholder would be subject to the same treatment as U.S. stockholders with
respect to such gain (subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a
special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals).
Gain on the sale of Company stock not subject to FIRPTA will still be taxable to
a Non-U.S. Stockholder if (i) investment in the shares is effectively connected
with a United States trade or business of the Non-U.S. Stockholder (or, if an
income tax treaty applies, is attributable to a United States permanent
establishment of the Non-U.S. Stockholder), in which case the Non-U.S.
Stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. stockholders with
respect to such gain, or (ii) the Non-U.S. Stockholder is a nonresident alien
individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the
taxable year and has a "tax home" in the United States, in which case the
nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual's
capital gains..
If the proceeds of a disposition of shares of Company stock are paid by or
through a United States office of a broker, the payment is subject to
information reporting and backup withholding unless the disposing Non-U.S.
Stockholder certifies as to his name, address and non-United States status or
otherwise establishes an exemption. Generally, United States information
reporting and backup withholding will not apply to a payment of disposition
proceeds if the payment is made outside the United States through a non-United
States office of a non-United States broker. United States information reporting
requirements (but not backup withholding) will apply, however, to a payment of
disposition proceeds outside the United States if (i) the payment is made
through an office outside the United States of a broker that is either (a) a
United States person, (b) a foreign person that derives 50% or more of its gross
income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United
States or (c) a "controlled foreign corporation" for United States federal
income tax purposes, and (ii) the broker fails to obtain documentary evidence
that the stockholder is a Non-U.S. Stockholder and that certain conditions are
met or that the Non-U.S. Stockholder otherwise is entitled to an exemption.
29
<PAGE> 31
Possible Legislative or Other Actions Affecting Tax Consequences
Prospective investors should recognize that the present federal income tax
treatment of an investment in the Company may be modified by legislative,
judicial or administrative action at any time, and that any such action may
affect investments and commitments previously made. The rules dealing with
federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the
legislative process and by the Service and the U.S. Treasury Department,
resulting in revisions or regulations and revised interpretations of established
concepts as well as statutory changes. Revisions in federal tax laws and
interpretations thereof could adversely affect the tax consequences of an
investment in the Company. For example, a recent federal budget proposal
contains language, which, if enacted in its present form, would result in the
immediate taxation of all gain inherent in a C corporation's assets upon an
election by the corporation to become a REIT, and thus would effectively
preclude the Company from re-electing REIT status following a termination of its
REIT qualification.
State Tax Consequences and Withholding
The Company and its stockholders may be subject to state or local taxation
in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which it or they
transact business or reside. The state and local tax treatment of the Company
and its stockholders may not conform to the federal income tax consequences
discussed above. Several states in which the Company may conduct business treat
REITs as ordinary corporations. The Company does not believe, however, that
stockholders will be required to file state tax returns, other than in their
respective states of residence, as a result of the ownership of shares of the
Company's capital stock. However, prospective stockholders should consult their
own tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an
investment in the Company.
EACH INVESTOR IS ADVISED TO CONSULT WITH HIS OR HER TAX ADVISOR REGARDING
THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO HIM OR HER OF THE OWNERSHIP AND SALE OF COMMON
STOCK IN AN ENTITY ELECTING TO BE TAXED AS A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST,
INCLUDING THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN, AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH
PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP, SALE, AND ELECTION AND OF POTENTIAL CHANGES IN APPLICABLE
TAX LAWS.
30
<PAGE> 32
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Company may sell the Offered Securities to one or more underwriters for
public offering and sale by them or may sell the Offered Securities to investors
directly or through agents, which agents may be affiliated with the Company. Any
such underwriter or agent involved in the offer and sale of the Offered
Securities will be named in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. Direct sales
to investors may be accomplished through subscription offerings or concurrent
rights offerings to the Company's stockholders and direct placements to third
parties.
Sales of Offered Securities offered pursuant to any applicable Prospectus
Supplement may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions on the
New York Stock Exchange or in negotiated transactions or any combination of such
methods of sale, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices
related to such prevailing market prices or at other negotiated prices.
Underwriters may offer and sell Offered Securities at a fixed price or
prices which may be changed, at prices related to the prevailing market prices
at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices. The Company also may offer and
sell the Offered Securities in exchange for one or more of its then outstanding
issues of debt or convertible debt securities. The Company also may, from time
to time, authorize underwriters acting as the Company's agents to offer and sell
the Offered Securities upon the terms and conditions as set forth in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement. In connection with the sale of Offered
Securities, underwriters may be deemed to have received compensation from the
Company in the form of underwriting discounts or commissions and may also
receive commissions from purchasers of Offered Securities for whom they may act
as agent. Underwriters may sell Offered Securities to or through dealers, and
such dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or
commissions from the underwriters and/or commissions from the purchasers for
whom they may act as agents.
Any underwriting compensation paid by the Company to underwriters or agents
in connection with the offering of Offered Securities, and any discounts,
concessions or commissions allowed by underwriters to participating dealers,
will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. Underwriters, dealers
and agents participating in the distribution of the Offered Securities may be
deemed to be underwriters, and any discounts and commissions received by them
and any profit realized by them on resale of the Offered Securities may be
deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.
Underwriters, dealers and agents may be entitled, under agreements entered into
with the Company, to indemnification against and contribution toward certain
civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Any such
indemnification agreements will be described in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement.
Unless otherwise specified in the related Prospectus Supplement, each
series of Offered Securities will be a new issue with no established trading
market, other than the Common Stock which is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange. Any shares of Common Stock sold pursuant to a Prospectus Supplement
will be listed on such exchange, subject to official notice of issuance. The
Company may elect to list any series of Preferred Stock or Warrants on any
exchange, but is not obligated to do so. It is possible that one or more
underwriters may make a market in a series of Offered Securities, but will not
be obligated to do so and may discontinue any market making at any time without
notice. Therefore, no assurance can be given as to the liquidity of the trading
market for the Offered Securities.
If so indicated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the Company may
authorize dealers acting as the Company's agents to solicit offers by certain
institutions to purchase Offered Securities from the Company at the public
offering price set forth in such Prospectus Supplement pursuant to Delayed
Delivery Contracts ("Contracts") providing for payment and delivery on the date
or dates stated in such Prospectus Supplement. Each Contract will be for an
amount not less than, and the aggregate principal amount of Offered Securities
sold pursuant to Contracts shall be not less nor more than, the respective
amounts stated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. Institutions with whom
Contracts, when authorized, may be made include commercial and savings banks,
insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and
charitable institutions, and other institutions but will in all cases be subject
to the approval of the Company. Contracts will not be subject to any conditions
except (i) the purchase by an institution of the Offered Securities covered
31
<PAGE> 33
by its Contracts shall not at the time of delivery be prohibited under the laws
of any jurisdiction in the United States to which such institution is subject,
and (ii) if the Offered Securities are being sold to underwriters, the Company
shall have sold to such underwriters the total principal amount of the Offered
Securities less the principal amount thereof covered by Contracts.
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates may be customers of,
engage in transactions with and perform services for, the Company and its
subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business.
In order to facilitate an offering of Offered Securities, certain persons
participating in the offering may engage in transactions that stabilize,
maintain, or otherwise affect the price of the Offered Securities during and
after the offering. Specifically, the underwriters may over-allot or otherwise
create a short position in the Offered Securities for their own account by
selling more Offered Securities than have been sold to them by the Company. The
underwriters may elect to cover any such short position by purchasing Offered
Securities in the open market or by exercising any over-allotment option granted
to the underwriters. In addition, such persons may stabilize or maintain the
price of the Offered Securities by bidding for or purchasing Offered Securities
in the open market and may impose penalty bids, under which selling concessions
allowed to syndicate members or other broker-dealers participating in the
offering are reclaimed if Offered Securities previously distributed in the
offering are repurchased in connection with stabilization transactions or
otherwise. The effect of these transactions may be to stabilize or maintain the
market price of the Offered Securities at a level above that which might
otherwise prevail in the open market. The imposition of a penalty bid may also
affect the price of the Offered Securities to the extent that it discourages
resales thereof. No representation is made as to the magnitude or effect of any
such stabilization or other transactions. Such transactions may be effected on
the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued
at any time.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and related financial statement
schedules included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996 and the statement of revenues and certain expenses for
the acquired properties included in the Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K/A
filed February 24, 1997 and incorporated by reference herein have been audited
by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, to the extent and for
the periods indicated in their reports and have been incorporated herein in
reliance on such reports given on the authority of that firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Offered Securities will be passed upon for the Company
by Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, California. In addition, the description
of the Company's qualifications and taxation as a REIT under the Code contained
in the Prospectus under the caption "Federal Income Tax Consequences -- General"
is based upon the opinion of Morrison & Foerster LLP.
32
<PAGE> 34
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, in
connection with the offering of the securities being registered are set forth
below. All of such expenses are estimates, except the Securities Act
Registration fee.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Securities Act Registration fee................................... $106,061
Printing fees..................................................... 50,000
Legal fees and expenses........................................... 100,000
Accounting fees and expenses...................................... 5,000
Blue sky fees and expenses........................................ 15,000
NASD filing fee................................................... 30,500
Miscellaneous expenses............................................ 43,439
--------
Total................................................... $350,000
========
</TABLE>
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The Maryland GCL permits a Maryland Corporation to include in its charter a
provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the
corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for (i) actual receipt
of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (ii) active
and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to
the cause of action. The Charter contains such a provision which limits such
liability to the maximum extent permitted by the Maryland GCL.
The Charter authorizes the Company to obligate itself to indemnify its
present and former officers and directors and to pay or reimburse reasonable
expenses for those individuals in advance of the final disposition of a
proceeding to the maximum extent permitted from time to time by the laws of
Maryland. The Bylaws of the Company obligate it to indemnify, and advance
expenses to present, former and proposed directors and officers to the maximum
extent permitted by Maryland law. The Maryland GCL permits a corporation to
indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against
judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually
incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made a
party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is
established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material
to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was committed in bad faith
or (ii) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or
officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or
services, or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had a reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.
However, a corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or
in the right of the corporation. In addition, the Maryland GCL requires the
Company, as conditions to advancing expenses, to obtain (i) a written
affirmation by the director or officer of his good-faith belief that he has met
the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the Company as
authorized by the applicable Bylaws and (ii) a written statement by him or on
his behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the Company if it shall
ultimately be determined that the standard of conduct was not met. The Bylaws of
the Company also permit the Company to provide indemnification and to advance
expenses to a present or former director or officer who served a predecessor of
the Company in that capacity, and to any employee or agent of the Company, or a
predecessor of the Company. Finally, the Maryland GCL requires a corporation
(unless its charter provides otherwise, which the Company's Charter does not) to
indemnify a director or officer who has been successful on the merits, or
otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he is made a party by
reason of service in that capacity.
II-1
<PAGE> 35
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its
directors and executive officers to provide them with indemnification to the
full extent permitted by the Charter and Bylaws of Company.
The Company has obtained an insurance policy to provide liability coverage
for directors and officers of Company.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<C> <C> <S>
1.1* -- Form of Underwriting Agreement
3.1 -- Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of the
Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-09411))
3.2 -- Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-09411))
4.1* -- Form of Certificate of Articles Supplementary for additional series of Preferred
Stock or for other classes or series of the Company's capital stock
4.2* -- Form of Warrant Agreement
5.1* -- Opinion of Morrison & Foerster LLP
8.1 -- Opinion of Morrison & Foerster LLP relating to certain tax matters
12.1 -- Statement on Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
23.1 -- Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
23.2 -- Consent of Morrison & Foerster LLP (included in Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1)
24.1 -- Power of Attorney (included as part of the signature page hereto)
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* To be filed by amendment or incorporated by reference in connection with the
applicable offering of the Offered Securities.
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being
made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the
effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set
forth in this registration statement; and
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in this registration
statement or any material change to such information in this
registration statement; provided, however, that subparagraphs (i)
and (ii) do not apply if the information required to be included
in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in
the periodic reports filed by the Registrant pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that
are incorporated by reference in this registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed
to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
herein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to
be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-2
<PAGE> 36
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment
any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.
The undersigned Registrant hereby further undertakes that, for the purposes
of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of
the Registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in this
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in such Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the Securities being
registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication
of such issue.
II-3
<PAGE> 37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Company
certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this Registration
Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of San Mateo, State of California on May 7, 1997.
GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST
INCORPORATED
By: /s/ ROBERT BATINOVICH
------------------------------------
Robert Batinovich
Chairman, President and,
Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert Batinovich, Andrew
Batinovich, Sandra L. Boyle and Frank E. Austin as his/her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, jointly and severally, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for and in his/her stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign on his/her behalf the Registration Statement on Form S-3 in
connection with the sale by Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated of shares of
offered securities, and to execute any amendments thereto (including post-
effective amendments) or certificates that may be required in connection with
this Registration Statement, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto,
and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, jointly
and severally, the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
and thing necessary or advisable to all intents and purposes as he/she might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, jointly and severally, or his/her substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement on Form S-3 has been signed by the following persons in
the capacities and on the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- ------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- ------------------
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ ROBERT BATINOVICH Chairman, President and May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------ Chief Executive Officer
Robert Batinovich
/s/ ANDREW BATINOVICH Director, Executive Vice May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------ President, Chief Operating
Andrew Batinovich Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
/s/ SANDRA L. BOYLE Senior Vice President May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------
Sandra L. Boyle
/s/ FRANK E. AUSTIN Senior Vice President, May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------ General Counsel and
Frank E. Austin Secretary
</TABLE>
II-4
<PAGE> 38
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- ------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- ------------------
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ TERRI GARNICK Senior Vice President and May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------ Chief Accounting Officer
Terri Garnick
/s/ PATRICK FOLEY Director May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------
Patrick Foley
/s/ RICHARD A. MAGNUSON Director May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------
Richard A. Magnuson
/s/ LAURA WALLACE Director May 7, 1997
- ------------------------------------------
Laura Wallace
</TABLE>
II-5
<PAGE> 39
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
1.1* Form of Underwriting Agreement for Common Stock
3.1 Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (File No. 333-09411))
3.2 Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-09411))
4.1* Form of Certificate of Articles of Supplementary for additional classes or series of
Preferred Stock or for other classes or series of the Company's capital stock
4.2* Form of Warrant Agreement
5.1 Opinion of Morrison & Foerster LLP
8.1 Opinion of Morrison & Foerster LLP relating to certain tax matters
12.1 Statement of Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
23.2 Consent of Morrison & Foerster LLP (included in Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1)
24.1 Power of Attorney (included as part of the signature page hereto)
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* To be filed by amendment or incorporated by reference in connection with the
applicable offering of Common Stock.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 5.1
May 7, 1997
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
400 South El Camino Real
San Mateo, CA 94402-1708
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are acting as counsel to Glenborough Realty Trust
Incorporated, a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the
shelf registration by the Company of $350,000,000 in maximum aggregate offering
price of (i) shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.001 per share
(the "Common Stock"), (ii) shares or fractional shares of the Company's
preferred stock ("Preferred Stock") and (iii) warrants to purchase shares of the
Company's Common Stock and Preferred Stock (the "Warrants"). The Common Stock,
Preferred Stock and Warrants are the subject of a Registration Statement (the
"Registration Statement") filed by the Company and the Operating Partnership on
Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act").
In our capacity as your counsel in connection with such
registration, we are familiar with the proceedings taken and proposed to be
taken by the Company in connection with the authorization and issuance of the
Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Warrants, and for the purposes of this
opinion, have assumed such proceedings will be timely completed in the manner
presently proposed. In addition, we have made such legal and factual
examinations and inquiries, including an examination of originals or copies
certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction of such documents,
corporate records and instruments, as we have deemed necessary or appropriate
for purposes of this opinion.
<PAGE> 2
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
May 7, 1997
Page 2
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
that:
(1) The Company has authority pursuant to its Articles of
Incorporation to issue the shares of Common Stock to be registered under the
Registration Statement and (a) upon the adoption by the Board of Directors of a
resolution in form and content required by applicable law, (b) upon compliance
with the applicable provisions of the Act and such state "blue sky" or
securities laws as may be applicable and (c) upon issuance and delivery of and
payment for such shares in the manner contemplated by the Registration Statement
and/or the applicable Prospectus Supplement, such shares of Common Stock will be
legally issued, fully paid, and nonassessable.
(2) The Company has authority pursuant to its Articles of
Incorporation to issue the shares of Preferred Stock to be registered under the
Registration Statement and (a) upon the adoption by the Board of Directors of a
resolution in form and content required by applicable law, (b) upon compliance
with the applicable provisions of the Act and such state "blue sky" or
securities laws as may be applicable, (c) upon the adoption by the Company's
Board of Directors and the due execution and filing by the Company with the
Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation (the "SDAT") of Articles
Supplementary establishing the preferences, limitations and relative voting and
other rights of each series of Preferred Stock prior to issuance thereof and (d)
upon issuance and delivery of and payment for such shares in the manner
contemplated by the Registration Statement and/or the applicable Prospectus
Supplement, such shares of Preferred Stock will be legally issued, fully paid,
and nonassessable.
(3) The Company has authority pursuant to its Articles of
Incorporation to issue the Warrants to be registered under the Registration
Statement. The shares of Common Stock and shares of Preferred Stock issuable
upon exercise of the Warrants will have been duly and validly authorized (a)
upon the adoption by the Board of Directors of a resolution in form and content
as required by applicable law, (b) upon compliance with the applicable
provisions of the Act and such state "blue sky" or securities laws as may be
applicable and (c) with respect to such shares of Preferred Stock, upon the
adoption by the Company's Board of Directors and the due execution and filing by
the Company with the Maryland SDAT of Articles Supplementary establishing the
preferences, limitations and relative voting and other rights of each series of
Preferred Stock prior to issuance thereof. The shares of Common Stock and shares
of Preferred Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, when duly and validly
authorized and when issued in the manner contemplated by the Registration
Statement and/or applicable Prospectus Supplement and in accordance with the
terms of the warrant agreement relating to such Warrants and at a price therein
provided for, will be legally issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
<PAGE> 3
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
May 7, 1997
Page 3
We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and further consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Legal Matters" in the Registration Statement, the Prospectus
constituting a part thereof and any amendments thereto.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Morrison & Foerster LLP
<PAGE> 1
May 7, 1997
EXHIBIT 8.1
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
400 South El Camino Real
San Mateo, CA 94402-1708
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are acting as counsel to Glenborough Realty Trust
Incorporated, a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the
shelf registration by the Company of $350,000,000 in maximum aggregate offering
price of (i) shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.001 per share
(the "Common Stock"), (ii) shares or fractional shares of the Company's
preferred stock ("Preferred Stock") and (iii) warrants to purchase shares of the
Company's Common Stock and Preferred Stock (the "Warrants"). The Common Stock,
Preferred Stock and Warrants are the subject of a Registration Statement (the
"Registration Statement") filed by the Company and the Operating Partnership on
Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"). We have been
requested to provide you with our opinion as to whether the Company is currently
organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as
a real estate investment trust ("REIT"), within the meaning of Section 856(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Capitalized terms
not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the
Registration Statement.
For purposes of the opinion set forth below, we have relied,
with your consent, upon the accuracy and completeness of the statements and
representations (which statements and representations we have neither
investigated nor verified) contained in the certificate of the Company dated May
7, 1997 (the "Certificate"). We have also relied upon the accuracy of the
Registration Statement.
Based upon such statements, representations and assumptions,
and subject to, the next two succeeding paragraphs, we are of the opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Company has operated in a manner that would qualify
it as a REIT under the Code, and if it continues to operate in the same manner,
it would continue to so qualify.
<PAGE> 2
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
May 7, 1997
Page Two
Our opinion is based upon the documents referred to above and
the current provisions of the Code, Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder,
published pronouncements of the Internal Revenue Service and case law, any of
which may be changed at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. You should
also be aware that opinions of counsel are not binding upon the Internal Revenue
Service or the courts. Any change in applicable law, or any inaccuracy in the
statements, representations and assumptions on which we have relied may affect
the continuing validity of the opinion set forth herein.
This opinion addresses only the operation of the Company in a
manner that qualifies it as a REIT as of the date hereof. We undertake no
obligation to update this opinion, or to ascertain after the date hereof whether
circumstances occurring after such date may affect the conclusions set forth
herein.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not thereby admit
that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7
of the Act.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Morrison & Foerster LLP
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 12.1
GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
for the five years ended December 31, 1996
and the three month period ended September 30, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GRT Predecessor Entities, Combined
Twelve Months Ended December 31, The Company
---------------------------------- -------------------
Twelve Three
Months Months
Ended Ended
1992 1993 1994 1995 12/31/96 3/31/97
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
EARNINGS, AS DEFINED
Net Income (loss) $(2,681) $ 4,418 $1,580 $ 524 $(1,609) $2,363
Extraordinary items (556) (2,274) -- -- 7,423 --
Federal and State income taxes 700 24 176 357 -- --
Minority Interest (8) 5 43 -- 292 231
Fixed Charges 1,860 1,301 1,140 2,129 3,913 1,573
------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
(685) $3,474 $2,939 $3,010 $10,019 $4,167
------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
FIXED CHARGES, AS DEFINED $1,860 $1,301 $1,140 $2,129 $3,913 $1,573
------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
FIXED CHARGES (0.37) 2.67 2.58 1.41 2.56 2.65
------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our reports dated January 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated, the combined
financial statements of the GRT Predecessor Entities, the consolidated financial
statements of Glenborough Hotel Group, and the financial statements of
Glenborough Inland Realty Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1996, incorporated by reference into this Registration Statement and the
related Prospectus of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated.
We also consent to the inclusion of our report dated February 15, 1997,
with respect to the financial statements of Atlantic Pacific Assurance Company
Limited included on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, incorporated
by reference into this Registration Statement and the related Prospectus of
Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated.
We also consent to the inclusion of our report dated July 9, 1996, with
respect to the statement of revenues and certain expenses of the University Club
Tower, which report is included on Form 8-K/A filed on February 24, 1997, and
incorporated by reference into this Registration Statement.
We also consent to the inclusion of our report dated July 9, 1996, with
respect to the statement of revenues and certain expenses of the TRP Properties,
which report is included on Form 8-K/A filed on February 24, 1997, and
incorporated by reference into this Registration Statement.
We also consent to the inclusion of our report dated November 15, 1996,
with respect to the statement of revenues and certain expenses of the Carlsberg
Properties, which report is included on Form 8-K/A filed on February 24, 1997,
and incorporated by reference into this Registration Statement.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
San Francisco, California
May 6, 1997
