GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INC
DEF 14A, 2000-04-06
REAL ESTATE
Previous: CALLON PETROLEUM CO, 8-K, 2000-04-06
Next: DUALSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP, 8-K, 2000-04-06




                             SCHEDULE 14A
                            (Rule 14a-101)
                INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
                       SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
      Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant   |X|
Filed by a party other than the Registrant   |_|
Check the appropriate box:
|_| Preliminary proxy statement    |_| Confidential, For Use of the
|X| Definitive proxy statement         Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
|_| Definitive additional materials    14a-6(e)(2))
|_| Soliciting material pursuant to
    Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

                     Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
               (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|X|    No fee required.
|_|    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2)    Aggregate number of securities to which transactions applies:


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(3)  Per unit price or other underlying  value of transaction  computed
     pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rule  0-11 (set  forth the  amount on which the
     filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(4)    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction.


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(5)    Total fee paid:


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       |_|  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     |_| Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
     Act Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting fee
     was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
     number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)    Amount previously paid:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2)    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(3)    Filing Party:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(4)    Date Filed:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PAGE>







                 Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders



Time:

           Friday, May 5, 2000
           10:00 a.m. (Pacific Daylight Time)


Place:

           Hotel Sofitel
           223 Twin Dolphin Drive
           Redwood City, California


Purpose:

o        To elect two Class II Directors for terms ending in 2003.

o        To conduct other business properly raised before the Annual Meeting
                and any postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting.


Record Date:

     You can vote if you are a stockholder of record at the close of business
     on February 29, 2000.



San Mateo, California           Robert Batinovich
April 5, 2000                   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




     Your vote is important. Please complete, sign, date, and return your proxy
                         promptly in the enclosed envelope.

<PAGE>


                             GLENBOROUGH
                      REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED

                400 South El Camino Real, 11th Floor
                  San Mateo, California 94402-1708


                           PROXY STATEMENT

                     1999 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                       ATTACHED AS APPENDIX A


     These  proxy   materials  are   delivered  in   connection   with  the
solicitation  by  the  Board  of  Directors  of  Glenborough  Realty  Trust
Incorporated,  of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held May 5, 2000. On April 5, 2000 we commenced mailing of this Proxy
Statement and the enclosed form of proxy to  stockholders  entitled to vote
at the meeting.

Stockholders who may vote

     Stockholders  of  Glenborough at the close of business on February 29,
2000 may vote at the meeting. As of that date, there were 30,511,503 shares
of common stock  outstanding and entitled to vote.  Holders of Common Stock
are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock so held.

How to vote

     You may vote by proxy or in person at the  meeting.  To vote by proxy,
please complete, sign, date, and return your proxy card in the postage-paid
envelope provided.

How proxies work

     Giving your proxy means that you  authorize  us to vote your shares at
the meeting in the manner you  direct.  If you sign,  date,  and return the
enclosed  proxy card but do not specify how the proxy  should be voted,  we
will vote your shares in favor of the  nominees  for  directors  designated
below.

How to revoke a proxy

     You may revoke your proxy  before it is voted by (a)  submitting a new
proxy with a later date, or (b) filing a written notice of revocation  with
Glenborough's Corporate Secretary, or (c) voting in person at the meeting.

Required vote

     In order  to carry on the  business  of the  meeting,  we must  have a
quorum.  A quorum  requires  the  presence,  in person or by proxy,  of the
holders of a majority of the votes  entitled to be cast at the meeting.  We
count  abstentions  and broker  "non-votes" as present and entitled to vote
for purposes of determining a quorum.  A broker non-vote occurs if you hold
shares in "street  name" and fail to provide  voting  instructions  to your
broker for those  shares.  Under  those  circumstances,  your broker may be
authorized  to vote for you on some routine  items but is  prohibited  from
voting on other items. Those items for which your broker cannot vote result
in broker non-votes.

     The  affirmative  vote of a plurality  of shares  present in person or
represented  by  proxy  is  necessary  for the  election  of each  director
nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted for this purpose.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Costs of proxy solicitation

     We will  pay the  expenses  of  soliciting  proxies.  In  addition  to
solicitation  by mail;  our  officers  may solicit  proxies in person or by
telephone.

Stockholder proposals for next year

     Glenborough's  Bylaws provide that the Annual Meeting of  Stockholders
is to be held on the first Friday in May of each year, or on such other day
within the month of May as the Board may designate.

     The  deadline  for  stockholder  proposals to be included in the Proxy
Statement for next year's  Annual  Meeting of  Stockholders  is December 4,
2000.  If you intend to submit such a proposal,  it must be received by the
Corporate Secretary at Glenborough's  principal office, 400 South El Camino
Real, San Mateo, California 94402-1708, no later than that date.

     If you intend to bring a matter  before  next  year's  annual  meeting
other than by submitting a proposal to be included in our Proxy  Statement,
you must give  timely  notice  according  to  Glenborough's  Bylaws.  To be
timely,  your notice must be received by Glenborough's  Corporate Secretary
at 400 South El Camino Real, San Mateo, California 94402-1708,  on or after
February 2, 2001 and on or before March 6, 2001.

      For each matter you intend to bring  before the  meeting,  your notice
 must include a brief description of the business you wish to be considered,
 any  material  interest  you have in that  business,  and the  reasons  for
 conducting that business at the meeting.  The notice must also include your
 name and address and the number of shares of Glenborough  Common stock that
 you own.

Securities ownership of certain beneficial owners

     The  following  table  provides   information  about  the  only  known
beneficial  owners of more than five percent of  Glenborough's  outstanding
common  stock,  based  solely on the most recent  Schedule  13G received by
Glenborough and our records.
                                                                                Percentage of Shares of
                                                                               Common Stock Outstanding
Name and Business Address     Amount and Nature of    Percentage of Shares         and Operating
      of Beneficial Owner     Beneficial Ownership       Outstanding(1)          Partnership Units(2)
- -------------------------     --------------------    --------------------     -------------------------
<S>                               <C>                       <C>                         <C>
Franklin Resources, Inc.
    and affiliates (3)            6,130,182                 17.8%                       14.5%
FMR Corp. (4)                     3,906,370                 12.6%                        9.3%
Robert Batinovich (5)             1,792,321                  5.8%                        4.2%
___________________________

(1) Assumes that Glenborough's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock beneficially
owned by the person, directly or indirectly, are exchanged for or converted into
shares of Glenborough's  Common Stock, and that none of the Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock held by other persons are so converted.
(2) Assumes the  exchange of all  outstanding  Operating  Partnership  Units for
shares of Common Stock.  Assumes that none of the shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock held by other persons are converted into shares of Common Stock,
and assumes that none of the options held by other persons are exercised.
(3) Franklin Resources,  Inc. ("FRI"), 777 Mariners Island Boulevard,  P. O. Box
7777, San Mateo, CA 94403-7777.  The securities are beneficially owned by one or
more open or closed-end investment companies or other managed accounts which are
advised by direct and indirect  investment  advisor  subsidiaries  (the "Adviser
Subsidiaries")   of  FRI.  Such  advisory   contracts   grant  to  such  Adviser
Subsidiaries  all investment  and/or voting power over the  securities  owned by
such advisory clients.  Therefore, such Adviser Subsidiaries may be deemed to be
the  beneficial  owner of these  securities.  Charles B.  Johnson  and Rupert H.
Johnson  (the  "Principal  Shareholders")  each  own  in  excess  of  10% of the
outstanding  Common Stock of FRI and are the principal  shareholders of FRI. FRI
and the  Principal  Shareholders  may be  deemed to be the  beneficial  owner of
securities held by persons and entities  advised by FRI  subsidiaries.  FRI, the
Principal  Shareholders  and  each  of the  Adviser  Subsidiaries  disclaim  any
economic interest or beneficial  ownership in any of the securities.  The figure
shown  includes  3,339,482  shares of Common  Stock that would  result  upon the
conversion  of  4,385,400  shares  of  Convertible   Preferred  Stock.  Franklin
Advisers,  Inc.  has sole power to vote or to direct  the vote,  as well as sole
power to dispose or to direct the  disposition,  of 6,063,538  shares.  Franklin
Management,  Inc.  has sole power to dispose  or to direct the  disposition,  of
66,644 shares.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(4) Fidelity Management & Research Company  ("Fidelity"),  82 Devonshire Street,
Boston,  Massachusetts 02109, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR Corp. ("FMR") and
an investment  adviser  registered under Section 203 of the Investment  Advisers
Act of 1940 (the "Investment  Act"), is the beneficial owner of 2,778,670 shares
or 8.9% of such  Common  Stock as a result of acting as  investment  adviser  to
various investment companies. The ownership of one investment company,  Fidelity
Dividend Growth Fund, amounted to 1,740,500 shares or 5.6% of such Common Stock.
Edward C. Johnson 3d, FMR,  through its control of Fidelity,  and the Funds each
has sole power to dispose of the  2,778,670  shares owned by the Funds.  Neither
FMR nor Edward C.  Johnson 3d,  Chairman  of FMR,  has the sole power to vote or
direct the voting of the shares  owned  directly by the  Fidelity  Funds,  which
power  resides  with the Funds'  Boards of  Trustees.  Fidelity  carries out the
voting of the shares under written  guidelines  established by the Funds' Boards
of Trustees. Fidelity Management Trust Company ("Fidelity Trust"), 82 Devonshire
Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR and a bank
as defined in Section  3(a)(6) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  is the
beneficial owner of 1,127,700 shares or 3.6% of such Common Stock as a result of
its serving as investment  manager of the  institutional  account(s).  Edward C.
Johnson  3d and FMR,  through  its  control  of  Fidelity  Trust,  each has sole
dispositive   power  over  1,127,700   shares  of  Common  Stock  owned  by  the
institutional account(s) as reported above.
(5) See footnotes (5), (6) and (7) for table below.


Securities ownership of Directors and executive officers

     The  following  table  states  the  number of shares of  Glenborough's
common stock  beneficially  owned, as of February 29, 2000, by each current
Director,  each executive officer named in the "Summary Compensation Table"
and by all Directors and executive officers as a group.

                                             Amount and                                 Percentage of Shares of
                                              Nature of            Percentage of        Common Stock Outstanding
  Name and Business Address of                Beneficial               Shares               and Operating
     Beneficial Owner(4)                   Ownership(1)(6)         Outstanding(2)        Partnership Units(3)
- ------------------------------             ---------------         --------------       ------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                        <C>                      <C>
Robert Batinovich (5)(7)                     1,792,321                  5.8%                     4.2%
Andrew Batinovich (7)                          612,817                  2.0%                     1.4%
Sandra L. Boyle (7)                             53,297                   *                        *
Stephen R. Saul                                 25,439                   *                        *
Daniel Levin                                     3,000                   *                        *
Patrick Foley                                   44,128                   *                        *
Richard A. Magnuson                             25,000                   *                        *
Laura Wallace                                   26,200                   *                        *
Richard C. Blum                                 16,000                   *                        *
All directors and executive officers
     as a group (12 persons)                   2,665,687                8.6%                     6.2%

- -------------------------------------------
*      less than 1.0%

(1) Certain of the officers  hold or control  limited  partnership  interests in
Glenborough Partners, a California limited partnership ("Partners"), which holds
an interest in Glenborough  Properties,  L.P., a California limited  partnership
(the "Operating  Partnership"),  in which  Glenborough holds an interest both as
general partner and as limited partner. Such officers, through their interest in
Partners, share indirectly,  with Glenborough, in the net income or loss and any
distributions of the Operating Partnership. Certain of the officers beneficially
own a  portion  of the  equity  securities  (in the  form of  common  stock)  of
Glenborough  Corporation  ("GC"),  in which  Glenborough  also  holds an  equity
interest (in the form of non-voting  preferred stock); GC holds a small interest
in the  Operating  Partnership.  Pursuant to the  partnership  agreement  of the
Operating  Partnership,  Partners  and GC hold certain  redemption  rights under
which their  respective  interests in the  Operating  Partnership  could at some
point be redeemed in exchange for shares of Glenborough's Common Stock.
(2) Assumes that all  Operating  Partnership  Units and  Glenborough's  Series A
Convertible  Preferred  Stock  beneficially  owned by the  person,  directly  or
indirectly,  are exchanged for or converted into shares of Glenborough's  Common
Stock,  that none of the  Operating  Partnership  Units or Series A  Convertible
Preferred  Stock held by other persons are so exchanged or  converted,  that all
stock options  exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date owned by the person
are exercised and that no stock options held by other persons are exercised.
(3) Assumes that all  Operating  Partnership  Units and  Glenborough's  Series A
Convertible  Preferred Stock,  including those beneficially owned by the person,
directly  or  indirectly,   are  exchanged  for  or  converted  into  shares  of
Glenborough's Common Stock, that all stock options exercisable within 60 days of
the Record Date owned by the person are exercised and that no stock options held
by other persons are exercised.
(4) The business address of such person is 400 South El Camino Real, Suite 1100,
San Mateo, California 94402-1708.
(5) Excludes (i) 2,653 shares of  Glenborough's  Common Stock that may be issued
upon the redemption of Partners'  interest in the Operating  Partnership,  which
represents  Angela  Batinovich's  portion of all shares of Glenborough's  Common
Stock that may be issued to Partners  upon such  redemption,  (ii) 519 shares of
Glenborough's  Common Stock which represents Angela Batinovich's  portion of all
shares of Glenborough's Common Stock that is owned by Partners,  (iii) 91 shares
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

of  Glenborough's  Common  Stock that would be  acquired  by a trust as to which
Angela Batinovich is sole beneficiary and an independent third party is trustee,
which  represents  such trust's  portion of all shares of  Glenborough's  Common
Stock  that  would  be  acquired  by  Partners  upon  conversion  of  shares  of
Glenborough's  Series A Convertible  Preferred  Stock that is owned by Partners,
(iv) 6,905 shares of  Glenborough's  Common Stock which  represents such trust's
portion of all shares of  Glenborough's  Common  Stock that would be acquired by
such trust  upon  conversion  of shares of  Glenborough's  Series A  Convertible
Preferred  Stock that are owned by such  trust,  and (v)  111,857  shares of the
Company's Common Stock held by S.S. Rainbow,  a California  limited  partnership
("S.S.  Rainbow") in which Robert Batinovich's adult son, Andrew Batinovich,  is
general partner, and his daughter, Angela Batinovich, is a limited partner.
(6) Includes  shares of Common Stock  issuable  pursuant to options  exercisable
within 60 days of the Record Date, as shown in the following table:

Name                     Number of Shares               Name                           Number of Shares
- --------------------     --------------------           ---------------------------    -------------------
<S>                            <C>                      <C>                                 <C>
Robert Batinovich              450,000                  Patrick Foley                        18,000
Andrew Batinovich              286,757                  Richard C. Blum                      11,000
Sandra L. Boyle                 39,414                  Richard Magnuson                     18,000
Stephen Saul                    14,414                  Laura Wallace                        18,000
Daniel Levin                         0                  All directors and
                                                        executive officers as a             878,332
                                                        group

(7)      The breakdown of the amount shown as beneficial ownership is set forth in the table below.
                                                                                                      All Directors
                                                                                                      and Executive
                                                                    Robert        Andrew   Sandra L.       Officers
                                                                Batinovich    Batinovich       Boyle     as a Group
                                                             -------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                              <C>             <C>          <C>         <C>
The number of shares of Glenborough's Common Stock owned         1,089,435       206,892      13,000      1,412,269
directly by the officer

The number of shares of Glenborough's Common Stock that may         69,166             0           0         69,166
be issued upon:
o    redemption of the officer's interest in the
     Operating Partnership.
o    redemption of Partners' interest in the Operating             143,182         5,945         356        149,975
     Partnership, which represents the officer's portion of
     all shares of Glenborough's Common Stock that may be
     issued to Partners upon such redemption.
o    redemption of GC's interest in the Operating                        0             0         446          1,149
     Partnership, which represents the officer's portion of
     all shares of Glenborough's Common Stock that may be
     issued to GC upon such redemption.

The number of shares of Glenborough's Common Stock which            28,019         1,163          70         29,348
represents the officer's portion of all shares of
Glenborough's Common Stock that is owned by Partners.

Includes the indicated number of shares of Glenborough's                 0        56,488           0         56,488
Common Stock beneficially held by Andrew Batinovich through
S.S. Rainbow, in which Andrew Batinovich is sole general
partner and his sister, Angela Batinovich, is a limited
partner.

Includes the indicated number of shares of Glenborough's                 0        55,369           0         55,369
Common Stock beneficially held by Angela Batinovich through
S.S. Rainbow.

The number of shares of Glenborough's Common Stock which             4,905           204          12          5,138
represents the officer's portion of all shares of
Glenborough's Common Stock that would be acquired by
Partners upon conversion of the shares of Glenborough's
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that are owned by
Partners.

The number of shares of Glenborough's Common Stock that              7,615             0           0          8,453
would be acquired by the officer upon conversion of shares
of Glenborough's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that
are owned by the officer.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance.

     Section  16(a)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  requires
Glenborough's  directors and executive officers to file with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (SEC) and the New York Stock Exchange  reports of
ownership  and changes in ownership of  Glenborough  Common Stock and other
equity  securities of  Glenborough.  Directors  and executive  officers are
required  by SEC  regulations  to furnish  Glenborough  with  copies of all
Section 16(a) reports they file.

     To  Glenborough's  knowledge,  based solely on review of the copies of
such reports  furnished to Glenborough and written  representations  by our
directors  and  executive  officers  that no other  reports were  required,
during  1999  all  Section  16(a)  filing  requirements  applicable  to our
directors and executive officers were complied with.

                            I. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

                             (Item 1 on Proxy Card)

     Glenborough's  Board of Directors is divided into three classes,  with
the term of office of each class ending in successive  years.  The terms of
the  Directors  of Class  II  expire  with  this  meeting.  Each of the two
nominees  for Class II, if  elected,  will serve three years until the 2003
Annual  Meeting and until a successor has been elected and  qualified.  The
Directors in Class I will continue in office until the 2002 meeting and the
Directors in Class III will continue in office until the 2001 meeting.

     The persons named in the accompanying  proxy will vote your shares for
the  election of the  nominees  named below as Directors of Class II unless
you  direct  otherwise.  Each  nominee  has  consented  to be named  and to
continue to serve if elected. If any of the nominees become unavailable for
election for any reason,  the proxies will be voted for the other  nominees
and for any substitutes.  The affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares
of Common Stock  present or  represented  to vote at the Annual  Meeting is
necessary to elect each Class II director  nominee.  Abstentions and broker
non-votes  will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the
result of the vote.

Nominees for Director

     The  following  information  is given with respect to the nominees for
election

Class II - Nominees to serve three years until 2003 Annual Meeting

     Robert  Batinovich  has  served as  Glenborough's  Chairman  and Chief
Executive  Officer since Glenborough began operations on December 31, 1995.
Mr.  Batinovich  also  served as  Glenborough's  President  from  inception
through September 1997. He also was the founder of Glenborough  Corporation
and  certain  of its  affiliates,  and has  been  engaged  in  real  estate
investment and management,  and corporate finance, since 1970. He served as
President,  Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Glenborough Corporation
from  its  formation  in 1978  until  its  consolidation  and  merger  with
Glenborough  (the  "Consolidation")  on December 31, 1995.  Mr.  Batinovich
served as a member of the California Public Utilities  Commission from 1975
to 1979,  serving as its President the last three years.  He is a member of
the Board of Directors of the Farr  Company,  a publicly  held company that
manufactures  industrial  filters.  Mr.  Batinovich's  business  background
includes seven years as an executive with Norris  Industries,  and managing
and/or owning  manufacturing,  vending and service companies and a national
bank, and providing investment consulting to businesses and individuals. He
has served on a number of governmental  commissions  and  participated in a
variety of policy  research  efforts  sponsored  by  government  bodies and
universities.

     Patrick Foley has served as director of Glenborough  since January 11,
1996. He is a private business consultant,  having retired in December 1999
after  eleven  years  as  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  DHL
Corporation,  Inc., and its major subsidiary, DHL Airways. Prior to joining
DHL, Mr. Foley was associated with the Hyatt Hotels  Corporation  ("Hyatt")
for 26 years in a variety of  capacities:  from 1962 to 1972;  as Executive
Vice President for Operations,  from 1972 to 1978; as President,  from 1978
to 1984;  as Chairman  from 1984 to 1988;  as Vice Chairman and later Chief
Executive  Officer of Braniff Airlines,  a Hyatt  subsidiary,  from 1984 to
1988.  Mr.  Foley  currently  is a member  of the  boards of  directors  of
Continental  Airlines,  Inc.,  Foundation  Health Systems,  Inc., Del Monte
Foods Company, EventSource.com and Flextronics International Ltd.
<PAGE>

Directors continuing in office

     The following  information  is given with respect to the Directors who
are not nominees for election at the Annual Meeting.

Class I - Serving until 2002 meeting

     Richard C. Blum was elected a director of Glenborough in January 1998.
Mr. Blum is Chairman and President of Richard C. Blum &  Associates,  Inc.,
which is a general partner of BLUM Capital Partners, L.P. (formerly Richard
C. Blum & Associates,  L.P.),  a merchant  banking and long-term  strategic
equity investment management firm which acts as general partner for various
investment partnerships and provides investment advisory services. Mr. Blum
also serves as a director of the Shaklee Corporation (nutritional household
and personal care products), URS Corporation (architectural and engineering
services),   CB  Richard  Ellis  Services,  Inc.  (real  estate  services),
Northwest  Airlines,   Playtex  Products,   Inc.  (personal  and  household
products),  and Korea  First Bank  (banking).  He is also a director of KFB
Newbridge Advisors,  Co., KFB Newbridge Control Corp. and KFB Co-Investment
I.  Co.,  as  well as  co-Chairman  of  Newbridge  Capital,  an  investment
management firm that invests in Asia and Latin America..

     Richard A.  Magnuson  has served as a director  of  Glenborough  since
January  11,  1996.  In 1999 he became  Executive  Managing  Director at CB
Richard Ellis  Investors  where he is  responsible  for  international  and
venture capital investments. Before joining CB Richard Ellis Investors, Mr.
Magnuson  joined Nomura  Securities  International  Inc. in 1994,  where he
served most  recently  as Deputy  Managing  Director of the private  equity
group in  London,  England.  Mr.  Magnuson  is a member of the  Urban  Land
Institute,  the National  Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, and
the International Council of Shopping Centers.

Class III - Serving until 2001 meeting

     Andrew Batinovich has served as a director,  Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of Glenborough  since
Glenborough began operations on December 31, 1995 until September 1997 when
he became  President and Chief Operating  Officer of  Glenborough.  He also
served as a director of Glenborough Corporation prior to the Consolidation,
was employed by Glenborough  Corporation from 1983 until the  Consolidation
and functioned as its Chief Operating  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer
since 1987. Mr.  Batinovich holds a California real estate broker's license
and is a Member of the  National  Advisory  Council of Building  Owners and
Managers Association ("BOMA") International.  Prior to joining Glenborough,
Mr. Batinovich was a lending officer with the  International  Banking Group
and the Corporate Real Estate Division of Security Pacific National Bank.

     Laura  Wallace has served as a director of  Glenborough  since January
11,  1996.  She is also Chief  Investment  Officer of the Public  Employees
Retirement System of Nevada, a position she has held since 1985. The Public
Employees  Retirement  System  comprises  80,000  active  members,   40,000
inactive  members,  and  20,000  benefit  recipients,  with  an  investment
portfolio  of  $12.6  billion.   Prior  to  joining  the  Public  Employees
Retirement  System,  Ms. Wallace served from 1977 to 1980 as Manager of the
Beaverton,  Oregon office of Safeco Title Insurance Company,  and from 1975
to 1977 as Senior  Assistant  Manager of the Beaverton  office of Household
Finance Corporation. Ms. Wallace is a member of the National Association of
State Investment  Officers,  of which she is past chairman; a member of the
executive board of the National  Conference of Public  Employee  Retirement
Systems;  past  member of the  Editorial  Board of the  Institutional  Real
Estate Letter; and serves as guest lecturer at the University of Nevada.

Board meetings and committees

     During 1999, the Board held four meetings.  The Board has two standing
committees:  the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee.  The Board
does not presently have a separate  nominating  committee,  the function of
which is handled by the Board as a whole.  All directors  attended at least
75% of the meetings of the Board and Board  committees on which they served
during 1999.

     The Audit  Committee.  The Audit  Committee,  which  consists of Laura
Wallace and Richard A. Magnuson, both of whom are independent in accordance
with applicable  rules of the New York Stock  Exchange,  met twice in 1999.
The Audit Committee (i) reviews with Glenborough's  independent accountants
the annual  reports  received  from such  auditors;  (ii)  reviews with the
independent  auditors  the  scope of the  succeeding  annual  audit;  (iii)
<PAGE>

nominates the  independent  auditors to be selected each year by the Board;
(iv) reviews  consulting  services  rendered by  Glenborough's  independent
auditors and evaluates the possible effect on the auditors' independence of
performing such services; (v) ascertains the existence of adequate internal
accounting  and control  systems;  and (vi)  reviews  with  management  and
Glenborough's  independent  auditors  current and emerging  accounting  and
financial reporting requirements and practices affecting Glenborough.

     The Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, which consists
of Patrick Foley, Laura Wallace and Richard C. Blum, met twice in 1999. The
Compensation  Committee (i) reviews Glenborough's  compensation  philosophy
and  programs  and  determines  compensation  for  Glenborough's  executive
officers;  (ii) administers  Glenborough's 1996 Stock Incentive Plan; (iii)
takes all independent action required under the federal securities laws and
the  Internal  Revenue  Code  on all  matters  pertaining  to  compensation
programs and policies,  including employee incentive and benefits programs;
and (iv) reports to the Board concerning its actions.

Compensation of Directors

     Annual  retainer.  Independent,  non-employee  directors are each paid
$20,000 annually,  plus $500 for each committee  meeting  attended,  except
that the  chairman  of each  committee  receives  $1,000  for each  meeting
attended.  Glenborough  also reimburses these directors for travel expenses
incurred in connection with their activities on Glenborough's behalf.

     Stock  options.  On November 4, 1999,  each  independent  non-employee
director  was granted an option to purchase  11,000  shares of  Glenborough
Common  Stock at an option  price equal to 100% of the fair market value on
that  date.   The  options  expire  ten  years  from  the  date  of  grant.
Thirty-three  and  one-third  percent of the  shares  subject to the option
become exercisable on November 4, 2002, and an additional  thirty-three and
one-third  percent  become  exercisable  on  November  4 of each of the two
succeeding years.

     Restricted  stock  grants.  On November  1, 1999,  Richard C. Blum was
granted  3,000  shares of  restricted  common stock of  Glenborough,  which
became fully vested on January 26, 2000.

Compensation Committee report on executive compensation

     The  Compensation   Committee,   which  is  composed  of  independent,
non-employee  directors  and has the principal  responsibilities  described
above, has furnished the following report on executive compensation.

     Executive Compensation Philosophy

          The  Compensation   Committee   believes  that  the  primary  goal  of
     Glenborough's  executive compensation program should be related to creating
     stockholder value. The executive  compensation policies of the Compensation
     Committee are designed to provide incentives to create stockholder value by
     attracting,  retaining and motivating  executive talent that contributes to
     Glenborough's   long-term   success,   by  rewarding  the   achievement  of
     Glenborough's   short-term  and  long-term   strategic  goals,  by  linking
     executive officer compensation and stockholder  interests through grants of
     awards  under  the  Stock  Incentive  Plan  and by  recognizing  individual
     contributions  to  Company   performance.   The  Committee   evaluates  the
     performance of Glenborough and compares it to real estate investment trusts
     and real estate companies of similar size engaged in activities  similar to
     those of Glenborough.  The  compensation of  Glenborough's  named executive
     officers in 1999  consisted of base  salaries,  bonuses,  stock options and
     certain benefits.

          The Compensation  Committee  reviews the available  competitive  data,
     evaluates  the  particular   needs  of  Glenborough,   and  evaluates  each
     executive's  performance  to arrive at a  decision  regarding  compensation
     programs.  The  Compensation  Committee  has  retained  the  services of an
     independent compensation consultant (the Compensation Consultant) to assist
     the  Compensation  Committee  in its  evaluation  of the  key  elements  of
     Glenborough's  compensation  program. The Compensation  Consultant provides
     advice  to  the   Compensation   Committee   with  respect  to  competitive
     compensation  in the market in which  Glenborough  competes  for  executive
     talent and the  reasonableness  of the  current and  proposed  compensation
     levels.
<PAGE>


     1999 Executive Compensation

          For services performed in 1999,  executive  compensation  consisted of
     base salary, bonuses and grants of stock options and restricted stock under
     the Stock Incentive Plan. The stock options vest over time.

          Base Salary and Bonuses.  Base salaries and bonuses for  Glenborough's
     executive  officers  (other  than  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  the
     President  and Chief  Operating  Officer) are  determined  primarily on the
     basis  of  the  executive  officer's   responsibility,   qualification  and
     experience, as well as the general salary practices of peer companies among
     which Glenborough  competes for executive talent. The Committee reviews the
     base  salaries of these  executive  officers  annually in  accordance  with
     certain  criteria  determined  primarily on the basis of growth in revenues
     and funds  from  operations  per share of Common  Stock and on the basis of
     certain other factors which include (i)  individual  performance,  (ii) the
     functions  performed  by the  executive  officer  and (iii)  changes in the
     compensation peer group in which Glenborough competes for executive talent.
     The weight that the Compensation  Committee places on such factors may vary
     from   individual  to  individual  and  necessarily   involves   subjective
     determinations of individual performance.

          Employment  Agreements.  On January 1, 1998,  Glenborough entered into
     employment agreements with Robert Batinovich, Glenborough's Chief Executive
     Officer, and Andrew Batinovich, Glenborough's President and Chief Operating
     Officer.  Pursuant  to the  terms of those  employment  agreements,  Robert
     Batinovich receives an aggregate annual base salary of $480,000, and Andrew
     Batinovich  receives $325,000,  which was increased from $300,000 effective
     January 1, 1999. Each is eligible to participate in Glenborough's  employee
     benefit plans and executive compensation programs, including stock options.
     Also, under the employment agreements, each of Robert Batinovich and Andrew
     Batinovich is entitled to annual contingent bonuses based on the attainment
     of certain  criteria  tied to  Glenborough's  performance.  Each  agreement
     terminates on December 31, 2002, and thereafter may be extended in one year
     increments.  The employment agreements also provide for certain payments of
     base salary,  compensation and benefits upon termination  without cause and
     upon a change of control of Glenborough.

          Long-Term  Incentive  Compensation  Awards.  The Stock  Incentive Plan
     provides for grants to key  executives  and employees of Glenborough of (i)
     shares of Common Stock of Glenborough,  (ii) options or stock  appreciation
     rights  ("SARs") or similar  rights,  or (iii) any other  security with the
     value  derived from the value of the Common Stock of  Glenborough  or other
     securities issued by a related entity. The Compensation  Committee may make
     grants  under  the  Stock  Incentive  Plan  based on a number  of  factors,
     including  (a)  the  executive  officer's  or key  employee's  position  in
     Glenborough,  (b)  his or her  performance  and  responsibilities,  (c) the
     extent to which he or she already holds an equity stake in Glenborough, and
     (d)  contributions   and  anticipated   contributions  to  the  success  of
     Glenborough's financial performance.  In addition, the size, frequency, and
     type of long-term incentive grants are generally determined on the basis of
     past granting  practices,  fair market value of  Glenborough's  stock,  tax
     consequences  of the grant to the  individual and  Glenborough,  accounting
     impact, and the number of shares available for issuance.  However, the plan
     does not provide any formulaic  method for weighing  these  factors,  and a
     decision  to  grant  an award  is  based  primarily  upon the  Compensation
     Committee's  evaluation  of the  past  as well  as the  future  anticipated
     performance  and  responsibilities  of each  individual.  The  Compensation
     Committee may also consult with the Compensation Consultant with respect to
     long-term incentives and other compensation awards.

     Deductibility of Compensation

          Section  162(m) of the Internal  Revenue  Code denies a deduction  for
     compensation  in excess of $1 million paid to certain  executive  officers,
     unless  certain   performance,   disclosure,   and   stockholder   approval
     requirements  are met.  Option grants under  Glenborough's  Stock Incentive
     Plan are  intended  to  qualify  as  "performance-based"  compensation  not
     subject to the  Section  162(m)  deduction  limitation.  In  addition,  the
     Committee believes that a substantial  portion of the compensation  program
     would be exempted from the $1 million deduction limitation.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     Chief Executive Officer Compensation

          Salary,  Insurance and Bonus. The  compensation of Robert  Batinovich,
     Glenborough's  Chief  Executive  Officer,  for fiscal  1999 was  determined
     pursuant to the terms of a previously  negotiated employment agreement with
     Glenborough.  In 1999,  Mr.  Batinovich  received  an annual base salary of
     $480,000 and an aggregate of approximately  $26,085 in health insurance and
     other  benefits.  Mr.  Batinovich  did not  receive  a bonus,  because  his
     entitlement  to a bonus  was  contingent  upon the  attainment  of  certain
     performance thresholds set forth in the employment  agreements,  which were
     not met.

          Long-Term   Incentive   Awards.   Consistent  with  the   Compensation
     Committee's policy with respect to long-term incentive  compensation awards
     described  above,  Mr.  Batinovich was granted options to purchase  150,000
     shares of Common Stock, with an exercise price of $12.00 per share.

                                                     COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
                                                     OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

                                                     Patrick Foley
                                                     Laura Wallace
                                                     Richard C. Blum


Executive Officers

     The following  table sets forth certain  information  as of the Record
Date with respect to the executive officers, including their ages.

                                 Term
            Name       Age      Expires             Principal Position
- ------------------    -----    ---------   -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                    <C>        <C>      <C>
Robert Batinovich      63         2000     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew Batinovich      41         2001     Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
Sandra L. Boyle        51          --      Executive Vice President
Stephen R. Saul        46          --      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Frank E. Austin        52          --      Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Terri Garnick          39          --      Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
Steven F. Hallsey      48          --      Senior Vice President, Commercial Property Management
Richard C. Blum        64         2002     Director
Patrick Foley          68         2000     Director
Richard A. Magnuson    42         2002     Director
Laura Wallace          46         2001     Director

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Biographical information concerning directors is set forth above under
the caption "I. Election of Directors." Biographical information concerning
the executive officers is set forth below.

    Sandra L. Boyle has served as Executive  Vice President of Glenborough
ince September 1997, prior to which she served as Senior Vice President of
lenborough  since it began  operations on December 31, 1995. Ms. Boyle has
een associated  with  Glenborough  Corporation or its affiliated  entities
ince 1984. She was originally responsible for residential  marketing.  Her
esponsibilities were gradually expanded to include residential leasing and
anagement in 1985, and commercial  leasing and management in 1987. She was
lected Vice  President of  Glenborough  Corporation in 1989. She currently
upervises asset management, property management and management information
ervices for Glenborough. Ms. Boyle holds a California real estate broker's
icense and a CPM  designation,  is a past President of BOMA San Francisco,
nd is a member of the  National  Advisory  and Finance  Committee  of BOMA
nternational,  and the Board of Directors of BOMA San  Francisco  and BOMA
California.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

     Stephen R. Saul has served as Vice President of Glenborough  since May
1996 and became Glenborough's  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer in September  1997. He has served as Manager of Real Estate Finance
since joining Glenborough Corporation in April 1995. From 1991 to 1995, Mr.
Saul served as President of KSA Financial Corporation,  a company which was
based in  Sacramento,  California  and  which  originated  equity  and debt
financing for real estate projects in Northern  California;  he also served
five  years with  Security  Pacific  National  Bank and five years with the
development  company of  Harrington  and  Kulakoff.  Mr. Saul has a B.A. in
Architecture and Urban Studies from Stanford  University and an M.B.A. from
Harvard University.

     Frank E. Austin has served as Senior Vice  President,  General Counsel
and Secretary of Glenborough since Glenborough began operations on December
31,  1995.  Mr.  Austin  also  served as a Vice  President  of  Glenborough
Corporation  from 1985 until the completion of the  Consolidation.  He is a
member of the State Bar of California.  Prior to joining  Glenborough,  Mr.
Austin served for three years as committee  counsel in the California State
Senate,  three years with the law firm of Neumiller &  Beardslee,  and four
years at State Savings and Loan  Association and American  Savings and Loan
Association.

    Terri Garnick has served as Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Accounting
fficer and Treasurer of Glenborough  since Glenborough began operations on
ecember 31, 1995. Ms. Garnick joined Glenborough  Corporation in 1989, and
etween that time and the completion of the  Consolidation  was responsible
or property  management,  accounting,  financial  statements,  audits, SEC
eports,  and tax returns for partnerships  under management of Glenborough
orporation and its affiliates. Prior to joining Glenborough Corporation in
989, Ms.  Garnick was a controller at August  Financial  Corporation  from
986 to 1989 and was a Senior  Accountant at Deloitte  Haskins & Sells from
1983 to 1986.

     Steven F. Hallsey  joined  Glenborough  on January 12, 1998, as Senior
Vice  President  of  Commercial  Property  Management.   Prior  to  joining
Glenborough,  Mr.  Hallsey  served for three years as  President  and Chief
Operating Officer of Western National Group, a national property management
firm based in Irvine,  California;  and for two years as  President  of the
Harbor  Group of Norfolk,  Virginia,  which  owned and  operated a regional
portfolio of commercial  and  multifamily  properties.  He also served four
years as a Senior Vice  President  of Balcor  Property  Management  and six
years as Senior Executive Vice President of Clark Financial Corporation,  a
regional  property  management  firm  based in Salt Lake  City,  Utah.  Mr.
Hallsey  serves on the boards of directors of the  National  Multi  Housing
Counsel and the California Apartment Association, and is the founder of the
South Coast Apartment Association.
Transactions with related parties

     Glenborough  acquired from Glenborough  Partners, a California limited
partnership  ("Partners"),  an option  (the  "Option")  to  acquire  all of
Partners'  rights  under a Lease with  Option to  Purchase  Agreement  (the
"Lease/Option"),  to lease and acquire  certain  undeveloped  real property
located  in  Burlingame,  California  (the  "Property").  Glenborough  paid
approximately  $533,000 for such  acquisition,  with the intention of using
the option period to evaluate the  desirability  of developing the Property
as a Company investment.  Upon expiration of the option period in 1999, the
independent  members of  Glenborough's  Board of Directors  concluded  that
proceeding  with the  development  of the Property would have required that
Glenborough  incur  substantial  debt, and  accordingly on February 1, 1999
elected (Robert Batinovich and Andrew Batinovich abstaining) not to proceed
with  the  development  and not to  exercise  the  Option,  in  return  for
Partners'  Agreement  to  (i)  reimburse   Glenborough  for  $2,309,000  of
predevelopment  costs,  $462,000  to be paid in cash  with the  balance  of
$1,847,000  in a  promissory  note  bearing  interest at 10% and due on the
earlier of sale,  refinance  or March 31,  2002.  The note also  contains a
participation in profits realized by Partners from the development and sale
of the property. Robert Batinovich and Andrew Batinovich own, in aggregate,
approximately 22% of the partnership interests in Partners.

Summary compensation table

     The  following  table  reflects  all  compensation  received  by those
persons who were, as of December 31, 1999, the chief executive  officer and
the four other most highly  compensated  executive  officers of Glenborough
(collectively, the Named Officers).


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Summary Compensation Table

                                              Annual Compensation            Long Term Compensation
                                          ----------------------------   --------------------------------
                                                                          Restricted      Securities       All other
            Name and                                                         stock        underlying        compen-
       Principal Position          Year    Salary ($)     Bonus ($)      award(s) ($)   Options/SARs(#)  sation ($)(4)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                <C>       <C>           <C>             <C>             <C>                <C>
Robert Batinovich                  1999      480,000             0                         150,000(1)         26,085
   Chairman and                    1998      480,000       480,000                   -     800,000(5)         25,401
   Chief Executive Officer         1997      250,000       150,000                   -     450,000(3)         16,354

Andrew Batinovich                  1999      325,000             0                         150,000(1)         12,724
   Director, President and         1998      300,000       300,000                   -     380,000(6)         12,705
   Chief Operating Officer         1997      200,000        50,000                   -      80,000(3)          4,330

Sandra L. Boyle                    1999      230,000        92,000         200,063(7b)      50,000(1)         13,492
   Executive Vice                  1998      220,000       104,500                   -      35,000(2)         13,145
   President                       1997      190,000        76,000                   -      59,400(7a)        12,795

Stephen R. Saul                    1999      200,000        75,000         125,039(8b)      50,000(1)         12,683
   Executive Vice President        1998      175,000        42,750                   -      35,000(2)         12,405
   and Chief Financial Officer     1997      149,000        56,000                   -      45,000(8a)        10,181

 Daniel Levin                      1999      208,000        83,000                          30,000(1)         12,382
   Vice President                  1998      157,000        71,250                   -      85,000(9)         60,405
- ---------------------------------

(1)      Represents  stock options granted in November 1999 at an exercise price of $12.00.
(2)      Represents  stock options granted in October 1998 at an exercise price of $21.625.
(3)      Represents  stock options granted in October 1997 at an exercise price of $27.50.
(4)   Amounts shown comprise the components as shown in the following table:

                              Health and life insurance premiums     Contributions by Glenborough to       Relocation
                                     paid by Glenborough                  defined contribution             allowance
                                                                             retirement plan
                              -----------------------------------   -----------------------------------    -----------
                                 1997       1998        1999           1997        1998       1999            1998
                              -----------------------------------   -----------------------------------    -----------
         <S>                     <C>       <C>         <C>              <C>        <C>        <C>            <C>
         Robert Batinovich       16,354    17,401      18,085               0      8,000      8,000               0
         Andrew Batinovich        4,330     4,705       4,724               0      8,000      8,000               0
         Sandra L. Boyle          4,739     5,145       5,492           8,056      8,000      8,000               0
         Stephen R. Saul          3,811     4,405       4,683           6,370      8,000      8,000               0
         Daniel Levin                 0     2,405       4,382               0      8,000      8,000          50,000

(5) Comprises stock options granted in October 1998, as follows: 100,000 options
at an exercise price of $21.625; 233,333 options at an exercise price of $27.03;
233,333  options at an  exercise  price of  $32.44;  and  233,334  options at an
exercise price of $37.84.
(6) Comprises stock options granted in October 1998, as follows:  80,000 options
at an exercise price of $21.625; 100,000 options at an exercise price of $27.03;
100,000  options at an  exercise  price of  $32.44;  and  100,000  options at an
exercise price of $37.84.
(7a) Comprises  stock options as follows:  15,000  options  granted in September
1997 at an exercise price of $30.00, 15,000 options granted in September 1997 at
an exercise price of $26.00,  and 29,400  options  granted in October 1997 at an
exercise price of $27.50.
(7b)  Represents  the fair market value of 11,000 shares of restricted  stock on
the date of grant (May 18, 1999),  based upon the closing price of Glenborough's
Common  Stock of  $18.1875.  Dividends  are paid on the  restricted  stock.  Ten
percent of the restricted stock vests one year after grant and an additional ten
percent  vests each year  thereafter.  At December 31, 1999,  the officer held a
total of 16,000 shares of restricted  stock with an aggregate  fair market value
of $214,000, based on the closing price of Glenborough's Common Stock of $13.375
per share.
(8a)  Comprises  stock options  granted in 1997 as follows:  (i) 10,000  options
issued in March at an exercise  price of $20.25;  (ii) 10,000  options issued in
September  at an  exercise  price of  $26.00;  (iii)  10,000  options  issued in
September  at an exercise  price of $28.00;  and (iv) 15,000  options  issued in
October at an exercise price of $27.50
(8b) Represents the fair market value of 6,875 shares of restricted stock on the
date of grant (May 18,  1999),  based upon the  closing  price of  Glenborough's
Common Stock of $18.1875.  At December 31, 1999, the aggregate fair market value
of the restricted stock was $91,953, based on the closing price of Glenborough's
Common Stock of $13.375 per share.  Dividends are paid on the restricted  stock.
Ten percent of the restricted stock vests one year after grant and an additional
ten percent vests each year thereafter.
(9) Comprises  (i) 28,000  incentive  stock options  granted in March 1998 at an
exercise  price of $28.375,  and (ii) 57,000  stock  options as follows:  47,000
options  granted in March 1998 at an exercise price of $28.375,  of which 15,000
were re-priced at $21.625 in October 1998, and 10,000 options granted in October
1998 at an exercise price of $21.625.

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Option grants

     The following table  summarizes  options granted during fiscal 1999 to
the Named Officers.

                                                   Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
                                                                                                 Potential Realizable
                                                                                                   Value at Assumed
                                                                                                Annual Rates of Stock
                                                                                                  Price Appreciation
                                              Individual Option Grants                            for Option Term(1)
                                       Number of       % of Total
                                      Securities      Options/SARs
                                      Underlying       Granted to      Exercise
                           Grant     Options/SARs     Employees in    Price Per    Expiration
Name                       Date       Granted(2)      Fiscal Year    Share ($/Sh)     Date        5% ($)     10% ($)
<S>                        <C>          <C>              <C>            <C>           <C>        <C>         <C>
Robert Batinovich          11/4/99      150,000          13.5%          $12.00        11/4/09    1,132,010   2,868,736
Andrew Batinovich          11/4/99      150,000          13.5%           12.00        11/4/09    1,132,010   2,868,736
Sandra L. Boyle            11/4/99       50,000           4.5%           12.00        11/4/09      377,337     956,245
Stephen R. Saul            11/4/99       50,000           4.5%           12.00        11/4/09      377,337     956,245
Daniel Levin               11/4/99       30,000           2.7%           12.00        11/4/09      226,402     573,747
______________

(1) Potential  realizable value is determined by applying an amount equal to the
fair market value on the date of grant to the stated  annual  appreciation  rate
compounded  annually  for the  remaining  term of the  option,  subtracting  the
exercise price at the end of the period and multiplying the remaining  number by
the number of shares  subject to the  option.  Actual  gains,  if any,  on stock
option  exercise  and  Common  Stock  holdings  are  dependent  upon a number of
factors,  including the future  performance  of the Common Stock,  overall stock
market  conditions,  and the timing of option  exercises,  if any.  The  amounts
reflected  in this  table  do not  represent  our  estimate  or  projections  of
Glenborough's future stock prices.
(2) Reflects options that have a ten year term.

Option exercises and fiscal year-end values

     The Named Officers did not exercise any options in 1999. The following
table summarizes the value of outstanding options at December 31, 1999, for
the Named Officers.
                             Year-end Option Values

                       Number of Securities Underlying      Value of Unexercised In-the-Money
                       Unexercised Options at Year-End            Options at Year-End(1)
Name                   Exercisable       Unexercisable        Exercisable       Unexercisable
<S>                      <C>                 <C>                  <C>              <C>
Robert Batinovich        450,000             950,000              $0               $206,250
Andrew Batinovich        286,757             573,243               0                206,250
Sandra L. Boyle           39,414             179,986               0                 68,750
Stephen R. Saul           14,414             155,586               0                 68,750
Daniel Levin                   0             115,000               0                 41,250

- -------------------------------------------

(1) Based on the closing price of Glenborough's  Common Stock as reported on the
New York Stock  Exchange  on December  31, 1999 of $13.375 per share,  minus the
applicable  exercise  prices  per  share,  multiplied  by the  number  of shares
underlying the options.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Performance graph

     The  graph  below  compares  the  yearly   percentage  change  in  the
cumulative total stockholder  return for  Glenborough's  Common Stock (GLB)
from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1999 to: (i) the cumulative total
return on the Russell 2000 Index  (Russell  2000),  and (ii) the  following
five other real estate  investment  trusts  selected by  Glenborough  which
Glenborough  believes  are  comparable  in size and  engaged in  activities
similar  to  those  of  Glenborough  (the  Custom  Peer  Group):   Colonial
Properties Trust,  Cousins Properties  Incorporated,  Vornado Realty Trust,
Highwoods  Properties,  Inc. and Brandywine Realty Trust. The graph assumes
that the value of the investment in Glenborough's  common stock was $100 at
January 31, 1996 and that all dividends were reinvested.


                            Total Return Performance

(GRAPHIC OMITTED)
     (Graphic of line chart  shwoing  Glenborough,  Russell  2000 Index and
     Custom Peer Group performance)

         Sources: Bloomberg and FactSet Research Systems, Inc.


Compensation committee interlocks and insider participation

      Messrs. Foley and Blum and Ms. Wallace, each of whom is an independent
 director, served on the Compensation Committee of the Board during 1999. No
 interlocking  relationship  presently  exists  between  any  member  of the
 Compensation  Committee  and  any  member  of the  board  of  directors  or
 compensation committee of any other corporation.

Relationships among directors or executive officers

     Robert Batinovich, Glenborough's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
is the father of Andrew Batinovich,  Glenborough's director,  President and
Chief Operating Officer.  There are no other family relationships among any
directors and executive officers of Glenborough.

Independent Auditors

     Arthur  Andersen  LLP  served  as  Glenborough's   independent  public
accountants  for 1999,  and the Board has selected  Arthur  Andersen LLP to
serve as  independent  auditors of  Glenborough  for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2000. A  representative  of Arthur Andersen LLP is expected to
be present at the Annual  Meeting and will have the  opportunity  to make a
statement if the  representative  desires to do so and will be available to
respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

<PAGE>

                  II. OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING

     No other  matters  are  intended  to be brought  before the meeting by
Glenborough nor does  Glenborough  know of any matters to be brought before
the meeting by others. If, however,  any other matters properly come before
the  meeting,  the  persons  named  in  the  proxy  will  vote  the  shares
represented  thereby in  accordance  with the judgment of management on any
such matter.


IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. STOCKHOLDERS,  WHETHER OR NOT
THEY EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, ARE REQUESTED TO COMPLETE, DATE AND
SIGN THE ENCLOSED FORM OF PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENVELOPE  PROVIDED
FOR THAT  PURPOSE.  BY RETURNING  YOUR PROXY  PROMPTLY YOU CAN HELP  GLENBOROUGH
AVOID THE EXPENSE OF  FOLLOW-UP  MAILINGS TO ENSURE A QUORUM SO THAT THE MEETING
CAN BE HELD.  STOCKHOLDERS  WHO ATTEND THE  MEETING MAY REVOKE A PRIOR PROXY AND
VOTE THEIR PROXY IN PERSON AS SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.



                             By Order of the Board of Directors
                                     Robert Batinovich
                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

San Mateo, California
April 5, 2000

                                   GLENBOROUGH
                            REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED


                                   APPENDIX A
                               TO PROXY STATEMENT



                           1999 FINANCIAL INFORMATION



                                      Index


                                                                  Page
Selected Financial Data                                              1
Funds from Operations                                                3
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
    Condition and Results of Operations                              4
Report of Independent Public Accountants                            12
    Consolidated Balance Sheets                                     13
    Consolidated Statements of Operations                           14
    Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity                  15
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                           16
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                      18


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Selected Financial Data

Set forth below are selected financial data for:

     Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated: Consolidated balance sheet data
     is  presented  as  of  December  31,  1999,  1998,  1997,  1996  and  1995.
     Consolidated  operating  data is presented for the years ended December 31,
     1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996, and As Adjusted  consolidated  operating data is
     presented  for the year ended  December  31,  1995.  The As  Adjusted  data
     assumes the Consolidation and related  transactions  occurred on January 1,
     1995, in order to present the  operations of the Company for that period as
     if the  Consolidation  had been in effect for that period. As Adjusted data
     is presented to provide  amounts which are  comparable to the  consolidated
     results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 1999,
     1998, 1997 and 1996.

     The GRT Predecessor Entities: Combined operating data is presented for
     the year ended December 31, 1995.

This selected  financial data should be read in  conjunction  with the financial
statements  of  Glenborough  Realty  Trust  Incorporated,  including  the  notes
thereto, included on the following pages.
                                                       As of and for the Year Ended December 31,

                                    Historical    Historical    Historical    Historical    As Adjusted   Historical
                                        1999          1998          1997          1996          1995          1995
                                    ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
                                                                        [in thousands, except per share data]
Operating Data:
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Rental Revenue                      $  255,339    $  227,956    $  61,393     $  17,943      $ 13,495      $ 15,454
Fees and reimbursements                  3,312         2,802          719           311           260        16,019
Interest and other income                6,404         4,607        1,802         1,080           982         2,698
Equity in earnings of
     Associated Companies                1,222         1,314        2,743         1,598         1,691            --
Equity in loss of joint ventures          (310)          --            --            --            --            --
Total Revenues(1)                      274,980       241,475       68,148        21,253        16,428        34,171
Property operating expenses             88,037        74,079       18,958         5,266         4,084         8,576
General and administrative               9,688        11,038        3,319         1,393           983        15,947
Interest expense                        64,782        53,289        9,668         3,913         2,767         2,129
Depreciation and
   Amortization                         58,295        50,194       14,873         4,575         3,654         4,762
Income (loss) from operations
   before minority interest and
   extraordinary items                  52,949        48,552       21,330        (1,131)        4,077           524
Net income (loss) allocable to
   common shareholders(2)               50,286        44,602       19,368        (1,609)        3,796           524
Diluted amounts per common
share(3):
   Net income (loss) before
     extraordinary item             $     0.86    $     0.79     $   1.09     $   (0.21)     $   0.66            --
   Net income (loss)                      0.89          0.75         1.05         (0.24)         0.66            --
   Distributions(4)                       1.68          1.68         1.38          1.22          1.20            --
Balance Sheet Data:
Rental properties, net              $1,647,366    $1,742,439    $ 825,218     $ 161,945            --      $ 77,574
Mortgage loans receivable, net          37,582        42,420        3,692         9,905            --         7,465
Total assets                         1,794,604     1,879,016      865,774       185,520            --       105,740
Total debt                             897,358       922,097      228,299        75,891            --        36,168
Stockholders' equity                   784,334       828,533      580,123        97,600            --        55,628

Other Data:
EBIDA(5)                            $  168,242    $  151,562    $  44,380     $  14,273      $     --      $  9,291
Cash flow provided by (used for):
   Operating activities                 93,293        87,482       24,359         4,702         4,656       (10,608)
   Investing activities                 82,871      (613,840)    (569,242)      (61,833)        3,263         8,656
   Financing activities               (174,039)      525,645      548,598       (53,899)       (7,933)      (17,390)
FFO(6)                                  84,047        79,920       36,087        11,491         9,638         7,162
CAD(7)                                  66,576        68,357       32,335        10,497         8,856         3,237
Debt to total market                     54.7%         47.5%        18.5%         29.5%            --            --
capitalization(8)
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed                1.75          1.87         3.21          0.71            --           1.41
  Charges(9)
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
  Charges and Preferred                   1.31          1.36         3.21          0.71            --          1.41
  Dividends(10)

(1) Certain  revenues which are included in the historical  combined amounts for
1995 are not included on an adjusted  basis.  These revenues are included in two
unconsolidated  Associated Companies,  GHG and GC, on an as adjusted basis, from
which the Company receives lease payments and dividends.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(2) Historical  1996 net loss reflects  $7,237 of  Consolidation  and litigation
costs  incurred in connection  with the  Consolidation.  The  Consolidation  and
litigation  costs were expensed on January 1, 1996,  the Company's  first day of
operations.

(3) Diluted amounts include the effects of all classes of securities outstanding
at year-end,  including units of Operating  Partnership interests and options to
purchase stock of the Company. As adjusted net income per share is based upon as
adjusted weighted average shares outstanding of 5,753,709 for 1995.

(4) Historical  distributions  per common share for the years ended December 31,
1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996 consist of distributions declared for the periods then
ended.  As adjusted  distributions  per common share for the year ended December
31, 1995 are based on $0.30 per unit per quarter.

(5)  EBIDA  is  computed  as  income  (loss)  before   minority   interests  and
extraordinary items plus interest expense, depreciation and amortization,  gains
(losses) on disposal of properties and loss provisions.  In 1996,  consolidation
and litigation  costs were also added back to net income to determine EBIDA. The
Company  believes  that in  addition  to net income and cash  flows,  EBIDA is a
useful measure of the financial performance of an equity REIT because,  together
with net income and cash flows,  EBIDA  provides  investors  with an  additional
basis to evaluate  the  ability of a REIT to incur and service  debt and to fund
acquisitions, developments and other capital expenditures. To evaluate EBIDA and
the trends it depicts, the components of EBIDA, such as rental revenues,  rental
expenses, real estate taxes and general and administrative  expenses,  should be
considered. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations." Excluded from EBIDA are financing costs such as interest
as well as depreciation and amortization, each of which can significantly affect
a REIT's  results  of  operations  and  liquidity  and should be  considered  in
evaluating a REIT's operating performance. Further, EBIDA does not represent net
income or cash flows from  operating,  financing  and  investing  activities  as
defined by generally  accepted  accounting  principles and does not  necessarily
indicate that cash flows will be  sufficient  to fund all of the Company's  cash
needs.  It  should  not be  considered  as an  alternative  to net  income as an
indicator of the Company's  operating  performance  or as an alternative to cash
flows as a measure of liquidity.  Further, EBIDA as disclosed by other REITs may
not be comparable to the Company's  calculation  of EBIDA.  The following  table
reconciles  net income (loss) of the Company to EBIDA for the periods  presented
(in thousands):
                                                            For the Year Ended December 31,
                                       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                         GRT
                                                             The Company                             Predecessor
                                                                                                       Entities
                                       --------------------------------------------------------      -------------
                                        Historical    Historical    Historical    Historical          Historical
                                           1999          1998          1997          1996                1995
                                       ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------      -------------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>                 <C>
Net income (loss)                       $  50,286     $  44,602     $  19,368     $  (1,609)          $     524
Extraordinary item.                          (984)        1,400           843           186                  --
Minority interest                           3,647         2,550         1,119           292                  --
Interest expense                           64,782        53,289         9,668         3,913               2,129
Depreciation and amortization              58,295        50,194        14,873         4,575               4,762
Net (gain) loss on sales of real           (9,013)       (4,796)       (1,491)         (321)                 --
   estate assets
Loss on sale of mortgage loan               1,229            --            --            --                  --
   receivable
Loss on interest rate protection               --         4,323            --            --                  --
   agreement
Consolidation and litigation costs             --            --            --         7,237                  --
Loss provisions                                --            --            --            --               1,876
                                       ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------      -------------
EBIDA                                   $ 168,242     $ 151,562     $  44,380     $  14,273           $   9,291
                                       ============= ============= ============= ==============      =============

(6) Funds from Operations, as defined by NAREIT, represents income (loss) before
minority  interests and  extraordinary  items,  adjusted for real estate related
depreciation   and   amortization  and  gains  (losses)  from  the  disposal  of
properties.  In 1996, consolidation and litigation costs were also added back to
net income to  determine  FFO.  The Company  believes  that FFO is a widely used
measure of the financial  performance  of equity REITs which provides a relevant
basis for comparison among other REITs. Together with net income and cash flows,
FFO provides  investors  with an  additional  basis to evaluate the ability of a
REIT to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions,  developments and other
capital  expenditures.  FFO does not  represent  net  income or cash  flows from
operations as defined by GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to
net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the Company's
operating  performance  or as an  alternative  to  cash  flows  from  operating,
investing and financing  activities  (determined  in accordance  with GAAP) as a
measure of liquidity.  FFO does not necessarily indicate that cash flows will be
sufficient  to  fund  all  of  the  Company's  cash  needs  including  principal
amortization,  capital improvements and distributions to stockholders.  Further,
FFO as  disclosed  by  other  REITs  may  not  be  comparable  to the  Company's
calculation  of FFO. The Company  calculates  FFO in  accordance  with the White
Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in March 1995.

In October,  1999, NAREIT issued an update, 'White Paper on FFO-October 1999' to
clarify its definition of FFO. The  clarification  is effective  January 1, 2000
and requires  restatement for all periods  presented in financial  statements or
tables. FFO, as clarified by NAREIT,  represents "net income excluding gains (or
losses) from sales of property,  plus depreciation and  amortization,  and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.  Adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO
on the same basis.' The Company will report using the  clarified  definition  in
periods beginning after January 1, 2000.

(7) Cash available for distribution  ("CAD") represents net income (loss) before
minority  interests  and  extraordinary  items,  adjusted for  depreciation  and
amortization  including  amortization  of  deferred  financing  costs  and gains
(losses) from the disposal of properties,  less lease  commissions and recurring
capital expenditures,  consisting of tenant improvements and normal expenditures
intended to extend the useful life of the property  such as roof and parking lot
repairs.  CAD should not be considered an alternative to net income (computed in
accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's financial  performance or as
an alternative to cash flow from  operating  activities  (computed in accordance
with  GAAP) as a  measure  of the  Company's  liquidity,  nor is it  necessarily
indicative  of  sufficient  cash flow to fund all of the  Company's  cash needs.
Further,  CAD as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to the Company's
calculation of CAD.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(8)Debt to total market capitalization is calculated as total debt at period end
divided by total debt plus the market value of the Company's  outstanding common
stock and convertible  units,  based upon the closing prices of the Common Stock
of $13.375,  $20.375,  29.625 and $17.625 on December 31, 1999,  1998,  1997 and
1996,  respectively,  plus the  liquidation  value of the Company's  outstanding
Preferred  Stock  based on the  liquidation  preference  per  share of $25.00 on
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

(9) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed as net income (loss) from
operations, before minority interest and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges
(excluding capitalized interest) divided by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist
of interest costs including amortization of deferred financing costs.

(10) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred  dividends is computed
as net income (loss) from operations, before minority interest and extraordinary
items,  plus  fixed  charges  (excluding  capitalized  interest)  and  preferred
dividends,  divided by fixed  charges.  Fixed charges  consist of interest costs
including amortization of deferred financing costs.

Funds from Operations

Funds from  Operations,  as defined by NAREIT,  represents  income (loss) before
minority  interests and  extraordinary  items,  adjusted for real estate related
depreciation   and   amortization  and  gains  (losses)  from  the  disposal  of
properties.  The  Company  believes  that FFO is a widely  used  measure  of the
financial  performance  of equity  REITs  which  provides a  relevant  basis for
comparison  among other  REITs.  Together  with net income and cash  flows,  FFO
provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a REIT to
incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions,  developments and other capital
expenditures. FFO does not represent net income or cash flows from operations as
defined by GAAP,  and should not be considered as an  alternative  to net income
(determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the Company's  operating
performance  or as an alternative  to cash flows from  operating,  investing and
financing  activities  (determined  in  accordance  with  GAAP) as a measure  of
liquidity.  FFO does not necessarily indicate that cash flows will be sufficient
to fund  all of the  Company's  cash  needs  including  principal  amortization,
capital  improvements  and  distributions  to  stockholders.   Further,  FFO  as
disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to the Company's  calculation  of
FFO.  The  Company  calculates  FFO in  accordance  with the White  Paper on FFO
approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in March 1995.

In October,  1999, NAREIT issued an update, 'White Paper on FFO-October 1999' to
clarify its definition of FFO. The  clarification  is effective  January 1, 2000
and requires  restatement for all periods  presented in financial  statements or
tables. FFO, as clarified by NAREIT,  represents "net income excluding gains (or
losses) from sales of property,  plus depreciation and  amortization,  and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.  Adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO
on the same basis." The Company will report using the  clarified  definition  in
periods beginning after January 1, 2000.

Cash  available for  distribution  ("CAD")  represents  net income (loss) before
minority  interests  and  extraordinary  items,  adjusted for  depreciation  and
amortization  including  amortization  of  deferred  financing  costs  and gains
(losses) from the disposal of properties,  less lease  commissions and recurring
capital expenditures,  consisting of tenant improvements and normal expenditures
intended to extend the useful life of the property  such as roof and parking lot
repairs.  CAD should not be considered an alternative to net income (computed in
accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's financial  performance or as
an alternative to cash flow from  operating  activities  (computed in accordance
with  GAAP) as a  measure  of the  Company's  liquidity,  nor is it  necessarily
indicative  of  sufficient  cash flow to fund all of the  Company's  cash needs.
Further,  CAD as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to the Company's
calculation of CAD.

The following table sets forth the Company's  calculation of FFO and CAD for the
three months ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 1999 and the
year ended December 31, 1999 (dollars in thousands):

                                                March 31,     June 30,       Sept 30,      Dec 31,     Year to Date
                                                  1999          1999           1999          1999          1999
                                               ------------  ------------  ------------- ------------- --------------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Income from operations before minority
    interest, extraordinary items and          $  13,236     $   16,892    $  12,325     $   10,496    $   52,949
    preferred dividends
Depreciation and amortization                     14,947         14,075       14,096         14,535        57,653
Preferred dividends                               (5,570)        (5,570)      (5,570)        (5,570)      (22,280)
Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate assets    (1,351)        (5,742)         371         (2,291)       (9,013)
Loss on sale of mortgage loan receivable               -              -            -          1,229         1,229
Adjustment  to reflect  FFO of  unconsolidated         -              -            -            788           788
JV's (2)
Adjustment to reflect FFO of Associated              253          2,170          135            163         2,721
    Companies (1)
                                               ------------  ------------  ------------- ------------- -------------

FFO                                            $  21,515     $   21,825    $  21,357     $   19,350    $   84,047
                                               ============  ============  ============= ============= =============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Amortization of deferred financing fees              485            508          477            564         2,034
Capital reserve (surplus)/deficit                 (1,269)           994          550              -           275
Capital expenditures                              (2,769)        (5,392)      (5,592)        (6,027)      (19,780)
                                               ------------  ------------  ------------- ------------- -------------

CAD                                            $  17,962     $   17,935    $  16,792     $   13,887    $   66,576
                                               ============  ============  ============= ============= =============
                                               ============  ============                              =============

Distributions per share (3)                    $    0.42     $     0.42    $    0.42     $     0.42    $     1.68
                                               ============  ============  ============= ============= =============
                                               ============  ============                              =============

Diluted weighted average common shares         36,098,374    35,984,107    35,274,940    34,726,581    35,522,627
    outstanding
                                               ============  ============  ============= ============= =============

(1)  Reflects  the  adjustments  to  FFO  required  to  reflect  the  FFO of the
Associated Companies allocable to the Company. The Company's  investments in the
Associated Companies are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
(2)  Reflects  the  adjustments  to  FFO  required  to  reflect  the  FFO of the
unconsolidated   joint  ventures   allocable  to  the  Company.   The  Company's
investments  in the joint  ventures are accounted for using the equity method of
accounting.
(3) The distributions for the three months ended December 31, 1999, were paid on
January 18, 2000.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following  discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of
operations  of the  Company  should  be read in  conjunction  with the  selected
financial data contained on the preceding pages and the  Consolidated  Financial
Statements  of  Glenborough  Realty  Trust  Incorporated,  including  the  notes
thereto, included on the following pages.

Results of Operations

Comparison  of the year ended  December 31, 1999 to the year ended  December 31,
1998.

Following is a table of net operating  income by property type, for  comparative
purposes, presenting the results for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998.

                                      Results of Operations by Property Type
                                  For the Years Ended December 31, 1999 and 1998
                                                  (in thousands)

                                      Office/                          Multi- Hotel       Property Eliminating    Total
                             Office      Flex Industrial    Retail     family and Other      Total  Entry(1)   Reported

1999
<S>                       <C>        <C>         <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>      <C>         <C>      <C>
Rental Revenue            $120,135   $35,772     $18,694   $11,182    $68,144    $1,412   $255,339          -  $255,339
Operating Expenses          46,840    10,184       4,445     3,640     30,570       420     96,099    ($8,062)   88,037
Net Operating Income        73,295    25,588      14,249     7,542     37,574       992    159,240      8,062   167,302
   Percentage of Total         46%       16%          9%        5%        23%        1%       100%
    NOI

1998
Rental Revenue            $117,746   $36,987     $16,104   $12,072    $40,865    $4,182   $227,956          -  $227,956
Operating Expenses          44,775    10,898       3,609     3,840     17,235       967     81,324    ($7,245)   74,079
Net Operating Income        72,971    26,089      12,495     8,232     23,630     3,215    146,632      7,245   153,877
   Percentage of Total         50%       18%          8%        6%        16%        2%       100%
    NOI

(1) Eliminating entry represents  internal market level property management fees
included in operating expenses to provide comparison to industry performance.

Rental Revenue.  Rental revenue increased  $27,383,000,  or 12%, to $255,339,000
for the year ended  December  31,  1999,  from  $227,956,000  for the year ended
December 31,  1998.  The  increase  included  growth in revenue from the office,
industrial,   and   multifamily   Properties  of   $2,389,000,   $2,590,000  and
$27,279,000, respectively. These increases were partially offset by decreases in
revenue  from the  office/flex,  retail  and  hotel  Properties  of  $1,215,000,
$890,000  and  $2,770,000,  respectively,  due to the 1998 and 1999  sales of 13
office/flex,  three retail and five hotel properties.  Excluding properties that
have been sold,  rental revenue for the year ended  December 31, 1999,  included
$16,504,000 generated from the 1996 Acquisitions, $86,695,000 generated from the
1997  Acquisitions,  $132,370,000  generated  from  the  1998  Acquisitions  and
$6,958,000  generated from the 1999  Acquisitions.  In addition,  $12,812,000 of
rental revenue was generated from 36 properties that were sold in 1999.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Fees and Reimbursements from Affiliates. Fees and reimbursements from affiliates
consist  primarily of property  management fees, asset management fees and lease
commissions paid to the Company under property and asset  management  agreements
with the Managed  Partnerships.  This  revenue  increased  $510,000,  or 18%, to
$3,312,000  for the year ended December 31, 1999,  from  $2,802,000 for the year
ended December 31, 1998. The change consists primarily of increased  transaction
fees from GC,  which were  generated  from the  disposition  of a  property  and
development  fees  paid  by an  affiliated  entity,  and  fees  earned  for  the
management of two  properties  in which the Company owns a 10%  interest.  These
management fees did not occur in 1998.

Interest and Other  Income.  Interest and other income  increased  $1,487,000 or
32%, to $6,094,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999, from $4,607,000 for the
year ended  December 31,  1998.  The  increase  primarily  consisted of interest
income on a mortgage loan receivable secured by land located in Aurora, Colorado
which  originated  on June 30,  1998,  and  interest  earned on  lender  impound
accounts and invested cash balances.

Equity in Earnings of  Associated  Companies.  Equity in earnings of  Associated
Companies  decreased  $92,000,  or 7%, to $1,222,000 for the year ended December
31, 1999,  from $1,314,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998. The decrease is
primarily  due to a decrease in earnings  from GC resulting  from a provision to
reduce the carrying  value of management  contracts  with certain of the Managed
Partnerships.  This  decrease  is also due to a decrease  in  earnings  from GHG
resulting from the cancellation of GHG's hotel leases with the Company.

Net Gain on Sales of Real Estate Assets and Repayment of Notes  Receivable.  The
net gain on sales of real estate  assets and  repayment of notes  receivable  of
$9,013,000  during the year ended December 31, 1999,  resulted from the sales of
eight office  properties,  13 office/flex  properties,  three retail properties,
seven industrial properties,  one multifamily property, two hotel properties,  a
small interest in real estate  securities  from the Company's  portfolio,  and a
reduction  in the  purchase  price of a hotel sold in 1998 for which the Company
received full payment on all seller  financing in 1999. The net gain on sales of
real estate  assets and repayment of notes  receivable of $4,796,000  during the
year ended  December 31, 1998,  resulted from the sales of one office  property,
two office/flex properties, four industrial properties, one multifamily property
and three hotel properties from the Company's portfolio.

Property Operating Expenses.  Property operating expenses increased $13,958,000,
or 19%, to $88,037,000  for the year ended December 31, 1999,  from  $74,079,000
for the year ended  December 31, 1998.  This  increase  represents  increases in
property operating  expenses  attributable to the 1998 Acquisitions and the 1999
Acquisitions  offset by decreases in property operating expenses due to the 1998
and 1999 sales of properties.

General  and  Administrative  Expenses.   General  and  administrative  expenses
decreased  $1,350,000,  or 12%, to  $9,688,000  for the year ended  December 31,
1999,  from  $11,038,000  for the year ended  December 31, 1998. The decrease is
primarily  due to a reduction  in staff and  overhead  expenses in response to a
decrease in acquisition and marketing  activities since mid-1998 and a reduction
in the number of properties  owned. As a percentage of rental  revenue,  general
and administrative  expenses decreased from 4.8% for the year ended December 31,
1998 to 3.8% for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Depreciation  and   Amortization.   Depreciation   and  amortization   increased
$8,101,000,  or 16%, to $58,295,000  for the year ended December 31, 1999,  from
$50,194,000  for the year ended December 31, 1998. The increase is primarily due
to depreciation and amortization  associated with the 1998 Acquisitions and 1999
Acquisitions.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $11,493,000, or 22%, to $64,782,000
for the year  ended  December  31,  1999,  from  $53,289,000  for the year ended
December  31, 1998.  Substantially  all of the increase was the result of higher
average  borrowings  during the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to the
year ended December 31, 1998, due to new debt and the assumption of debt related
to the 1998 Acquisitions and 1999 Acquisitions.

Loss on Sale of Mortgage  Loan  Receivable.  During  1999,  a note secured by an
office  property in Phoenix,  Arizona was sold to a third-party at a discount of
$1,229,000.  The  proceeds  of the  sale  were  invested  in the  repurchase  of
preferred stock.

Net  Gain  (Loss)  on  Early   Extinguishment   of  Debt.   Net  gain  on  early
extinguishment  of debt of $984,000  during the year ended  December  31,  1999,
consists of $3,115,000 of net gains on retirement of Senior Notes at a discount,
offset by  $2,026,000  of losses due to  prepayment  penalties  and  $105,000 of
losses due to the  write-off of  unamortized  loan fees upon the early payoff of
four  loans.  These loans were  paid-off  early when more  favorable  terms were
obtained  through  new  financing  (discussed  below)  and  upon the sale of the
properties  securing  the  loans.  Net loss on early  extinguishment  of debt of
$1,400,000  during the year ended  December  31, 1998,  consisted of  prepayment
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

penalties  and the write-off of  unamortized  loan fees upon the early payoff of
debt.  Various loans were paid-off early when more favorable terms were obtained
through new financing and upon the sale of one of the hotels.

Comparison  of the year ended  December 31, 1998 to the year ended  December 31,
1997.

Following is a table of net operating  income by property type, for  comparative
purposes, presenting the results for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997.

                                      Results of Operations by Property Type
                                  For the Years Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997
                                                  (in thousands)

                                    Office/                       Multi- Hotel       Property Eliminating    Total
                           Office      Flex Industrial   Retail   family and Other      Total  Entry(1)   Reported

1998
<S>                      <C>       <C>         <C>      <C>      <C>        <C>      <C>        <C>       <C>
Rental Revenue           $117,746  $36,987     $16,104  $12,072  $40,865    $4,182   $227,956         -   $227,956
Operating Expenses        44,775    10,898       3,609    3,840   17,235       967     81,324   ($7,245)    74,079
Net Operating Income      72,971    26,089      12,495    8,232   23,630     3,215    146,632     7,245    153,877
   Percentage of Total       50%       18%          8%       6%      16%        2%       100%
    NOI

1997
Rental Revenue           $25,071   $10,354      $7,320   $7,224   $5,536    $5,980    $61,485      ($92)   $61,393
Operating Expenses         9,986     3,062       1,459    2,183    2,309     1,894     20,893    (1,935)    18,958
Net Operating Income      15,085     7,292       5,861    5,041    3,227     4,086     40,592     1,843     42,435
   Percentage of Total       37%       18%         15%      12%       8%       10%       100%
    NOI

(1) Eliminating entry represents  internal market level property management fees
included in operating expenses to provide comparison to industry performance.

Rental Revenue. Rental revenue increased $166,563,000,  or 271%, to $227,956,000
for the year  ended  December  31,  1998,  from  $61,393,000  for the year ended
December 31,  1997.  The  increase  included  growth in revenue from the office,
office/flex,  industrial,  retail and  multifamily  Properties  of  $92,675,000,
$26,633,000,   $8,784,000,  $4,848,000  and  $35,329,000,   respectively.  These
increases  were  partially  offset by a $1,798,000  decrease in revenue from the
hotel  Properties  due to the 1998 sales of two hotels.  Rental  revenue for the
year ended December 31, 1998,  included  $17,404,000 of rental revenue generated
from the  acquisition  of 20 properties in 1996,  $96,130,000  of rental revenue
generated  from the  acquisition  of 90 properties in 1997 and  $104,254,000  of
rental revenue generated from the acquisition of 69 properties in 1998.

Fees and Reimbursements from Affiliates. Fees and reimbursements from affiliates
consist  primarily of property  management fees, asset management fees and lease
commissions paid to the Company under property and asset  management  agreements
with the Managed Partnerships.  This revenue increased  $2,083,000,  or 290%, to
$2,802,000  for the year ended  December  31, 1998,  from  $719,000 for the year
ended  December  31, 1997.  The change  consisted  primarily of increased  lease
commissions  from an  affiliated  entity  and  fees  resulting  from the sale of
managed properties.

Interest and Other Income.  Interest and other income increased  $2,805,000,  or
156%, to $4,607,000  for the year ended December 31, 1998,  from  $1,802,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997.  This increase was primarily due to $1,749,000
of interest income on a mortgage loan receivable secured by Gateway Center which
originated  on June 30,  1998.  In  addition,  in  1998,  the  Company  invested
approximately  $20  million  in the  securities  of a  private  REIT  which  was
accounted  for  using  the  equity  method.  In  1998,  the  Company  recognized
approximately $990,000 as equity in the earnings of this private REIT.

Equity in Earnings of  Associated  Companies.  Equity in earnings of  Associated
Companies  decreased  $1,429,000,  or 52%,  to  $1,314,000  for the  year  ended
December 31, 1998,  from  $2,743,000  for the year ended  December 31, 1997. The
decrease was primarily due to a decrease in earnings from GHG resulting from the
June 30, 1998  cancellation of GHG's hotel leases with the Company.  The Company
cancelled  the  leases  with GHG when it sold two of its  hotels  and leased the
other four hotels to other  operators.  In December  1998,  one of the remaining
four  hotels  was sold to one of the  operators  and two  other  hotels  were in
contract to be sold to another  operator in 1999.  This  decrease was  partially
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

offset by  transaction  fees earned by GC related to the  disposition of several
properties under its management.

Net Gain on Sales of Real Estate Assets and Repayment of Notes  Receivable.  The
net gain on sales of real estate  assets and  repayment of notes  receivable  of
$4,796,000  during the year ended December 31, 1998,  resulted from the sales of
one office property, two office/flex properties, four industrial properties, one
multifamily  property and three hotel  properties from the Company's  portfolio.
This net gain was  partially  offset by a $3.1  million  loss on the sale of the
Company's  investment in the securities of a private REIT. The net gain on sales
of real estate assets and repayment of notes receivable of $1,491,000 during the
year ended  December 31, 1997,  resulted from the sales of 16 retail  properties
from the Company's portfolio,  which resulted in a net gain of $839,000, and the
collection  of a mortgage  loan  receivable  which had a net  carrying  value of
$6,700,000.  The  payoff  amount  totaled  $6,863,000,   plus  a  $500,000  note
receivable, which, net of legal costs, resulted in a gain of $652,000.

Property Operating Expenses.  Property operating expenses increased $55,121,000,
or 291%, to $74,079,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998,  from  $18,958,000
for the year ended  December  31, 1997.  This  increase  primarily  consisted of
$22,750,000  attributable to the 1997 Acquisitions and $31,997,000  attributable
to the 1998 Acquisitions.

General  and  Administrative  Expenses.   General  and  administrative  expenses
increased  $7,719,000,  or 233%, to $11,038,000  for the year ended December 31,
1998,  from  $3,319,000  for the year ended  December 31, 1997. The increase was
primarily due to increased  salary and overhead  costs  resulting  from the 1997
Acquisitions and 1998 Acquisitions.  As a percentage of rental revenue,  general
and  administrative  expenses  actually  decreased  from 5.4% for the year ended
December 31, 1997 to 4.8% for the year ended December 31, 1998.

Depreciation  and   Amortization.   Depreciation   and  amortization   increased
$35,321,000,  or 237%, to $50,194,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, from
$14,873,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997. The increase was primarily due
to depreciation and amortization  associated with the 1997 Acquisitions and 1998
Acquisitions.

Interest  Expense.   Interest  expense  increased   $43,621,000,   or  451%,  to
$53,289,000  for the year ended December 31, 1998,  from $9,668,000 for the year
ended  December  31, 1997.  Substantially  all of the increase was the result of
higher average  borrowings  during the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared
to the year ended  December 31, 1997, due to new debt and the assumption of debt
related to the 1997 Acquisitions and 1998 Acquisitions.

Loss on Interest Rate  Protection  Agreement.  During 1998, the Company  entered
into a  forward  interest  rate  agreement  to  lock in the  risk-free  interest
component of a portion of a secured  mortgage to be issued in October 1998.  The
10-year Treasury rates decreased during the term of the hedge. During the fourth
quarter of 1998,  the Company  recorded an expense for its payment of $4,323,000
to terminate a portion of the forward interest rate agreement in connection with
a reduction in the amount of the mortgage to be issued. The Company's payment of
$6,244,000 in settlement of the remaining  portion of the forward  interest rate
agreement has offset the reduced  financing costs of the $248.8 million mortgage
issued in October 1998.

Net Loss on Early  Extinguishment  of Debt. Net loss on early  extinguishment of
debt of  $1,400,000  during the year  ended  December  31,  1998,  consisted  of
prepayment  penalties and the write-off of unamortized  loan fees upon the early
payoff of debt. Various loans were paid-off early when more favorable terms were
obtained through new financing (discussed below) and upon the sale of one of the
hotels.  Net loss on early  extinguishment  of debt of $843,000  during the year
ended December 31, 1997,  resulted from the write-off of  unamortized  loan fees
related to a $50 million  secured line of credit which was replaced  with a $250
million unsecured line of credit (the "Credit Facility') from a commercial bank.

Net Income and Earnings Per Share (EPS).  Net income increased  $25,234,000,  or
130%, to $44,602,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, from  $19,368,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997.  However,  Basic EPS decreased $0.32 per share
and Diluted EPS decreased  $0.30 per share for the year ended December 31, 1998,
from the year ended  December 31, 1997.  The  decreases in Basic and Diluted EPS
were due to a decrease in Net Income Available to Common Stockholders  resulting
from the  dividends  payable to preferred  stockholders  in 1998.  There were no
preferred  stock  dividends  paid  in  1997  as  there  was no  preferred  stock
outstanding until January 1998.
<PAGE>

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows
For the year ended  December 31,  1999,  cash  provided by operating  activities
increased by $5,811,000 to  $93,293,000  as compared to $87,482,000 in 1998. The
increase is primarily due to an increase in net income (before  depreciation and
amortization,  minority interest,  net gain on sales of real estate assets, loss
on sale of mortgage  loan  receivable  and net gain on early  extinguishment  of
debt) of $9,510,000 due to the 1998 Acquisitions and 1999  Acquisitions,  offset
by an  increase  in cash  used for  other  assets  and  liabilities.  Cash  from
investing activities increased by $696,711,000 to $82,871,000 for the year ended
December  31,  1999,  as compared  to  $613,840,000  of cash used for  investing
activities for the same period in 1998. The change is primarily due to decreased
property  acquisitions and increased  property  dispositions  from 1998 to 1999.
During the year ended December 31, 1998,  the Company  acquired 69 properties as
compared to ten properties  during the year ended December 31, 1999 and disposed
of 34 properties  in 1999 as compared to 11 in 1998. In addition,  cash used for
investments in development and mortgage loans receivable decreased significantly
during the year ended  December 31, 1999 as compared to the same period in 1998.
Cash from financing activities decreased by $699,684,000 to $174,039,000 of cash
used for financing  activities for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared
to $525,645,000 of cash provided by financing  activities for the same period in
1998.  This  change was  primarily  due to a decrease in net  proceeds  from the
issuance of stock,  a decrease in the proceeds  from new debt and an increase in
cash used for the  retirement  of Senior  Notes and  repurchases  of common  and
preferred  stock,  offset by a decrease in the repayment of other debt. In 1998,
the Company  completed  one  offering  of  Preferred  Stock;  there have been no
offerings in 1999. In addition,  in 1998,  the Company  issued  $150,000,000  of
unsecured Senior Notes.

The Company  expects to meets its short-term  liquidity  requirements  generally
through its working  capital,  its Credit  Facility (as defined  below) and cash
generated  by  operations.  The  Company  believes  that its cash  generated  by
operations  will  be  adequate  to  meet  operating  requirements  and  to  make
distributions  in accordance  with REIT  requirements  in both the short and the
long-term.  In addition to cash  generated by  operations,  the Credit  Facility
provides for working capital advances.  However,  there can be no assurance that
the  Company's  results of  operations  will not  fluctuate in the future and at
times  affect (i) its ability to meet its  operating  requirements  and (ii) the
amount of its distributions.

The  Company's  principal  sources of  funding  for  acquisitions,  development,
expansion  and  renovation  of  properties  and stock  repurchases  include  the
unsecured Credit Facility,  permanent  secured debt financing,  public unsecured
debt financing,  public and private equity and debt  issuances,  the issuance of
partnership units in the Operating Partnership, proceeds from property sales and
cash flow provided by operations.

Mortgage Loans Receivable
Mortgage loans  receivable  decreased from  $42,420,000 at December 31, 1998, to
$37,582,000 at December 31, 1999.  This decrease was primarily due to the payoff
of two loans totaling $4.3 million and a $1.6 million decrease in a loan secured
by a hotel property  resulting from a subsequent  adjustment to the sales price,
offset by a $1,141,000 loan made by the Company to the buyer of one of the hotel
properties  and  accrued  interest  on a  loan  made  by  the  Company  under  a
development alliance.

Secured and Unsecured Financing
Mortgage  loans payable  decreased  from  $708,578,000  at December 31, 1998, to
$701,715,000  at December 31, 1999.  This  decrease  resulted from the payoff of
approximately  $167,438,000  of mortgage loans in connection  with 1999 sales of
properties  and  refinancing  of  debt,  and  scheduled  principal  payments  of
approximately  $9,500,000.  This decrease is partially  offset by $39,275,000 of
new mortgage  loans in connection  with 1999  Acquisitions  and new financing of
$130,800,000 (as discussed below).

In March 1999, the Company  obtained a $26 million loan from a commercial  bank.
The loan was non-recourse and was secured by seven properties and had a maturity
date of December 22, 1999, with an option to extend for six months. The proceeds
were  used  to pay  off a loan  which  was  previously  secured  by  these  same
properties  and to reduce  other debt.  This loan was paid off in June 1999 with
proceeds generated from the sales of four properties.

In August 1999,  the Company  closed a $97.6 million  secured  financing  with a
commercial  bank  ("Secured  Financing').  The  proceeds  from  this  financing,
combined with proceeds from a new $7.2 million mortgage and a draw on the Credit
Facility, were used to retire a $113.2 million mortgage which would have matured
<PAGE>

in December of 1999. The new financing is a revolving line of credit maturing in
five years with a five-year  extension option,  and bears interest at a floating
rate  equal  to 75  basis  points  over the  rate  for  90-day  mortgage  backed
securities  credit-enhanced by FNMA. The December 31, 1999 interest rate on this
loan was 6.53%.

In connection with the Secured  Financing,  the Company entered into an interest
rate cap agreement to hedge  increases in interest rates above a specified level
of 11.21%.  The agreement is for a term  concurrent  with the Secured  Financing
instrument,  is indexed to a 90-day  LIBOR  rate,  and is for a notional  amount
equal to the maximum  amount  available  on the Secured  Financing  loan.  As of
December 31, 1999, the 90-day LIBOR rate was 6.00125%. The Company paid a fee at
the  inception of the cap  agreement,  which is being  amortized  as  additional
interest expense over the life of the agreement.

In November  1999,  through  the  acquisition  of a property  through one of the
Company's development  alliances,  the Company assumed a $10 million loan from a
commercial  bank.  This loan is secured by one office  property,  has a maturity
date of June 30, 2000 and bears  interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%
(the December 31, 1999 interest rate on this loan was 8.32%).

In December 1999, the Company  obtained an unsecured term loan from a commercial
bank whereby,  until December 9, 2000, the Company can borrow the lesser of $125
million or the then Loan Availability (as defined).  Any unborrowed amounts from
the  loan at  December  9,  2000  will  be  cancelled.  At  December  31,  1999,
$33,865,000  was  outstanding on the loan. This loan has a maturity date of June
10, 2002 and bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 1.75%. The December
31, 1999 interest rate on this loan was 8.25%.

In  the  second,  third  and  fourth  quarters  of  1999,  the  Company  retired
approximately $58.9 million of unsecured Senior Notes at a discount. As a result
of  these  transactions,   a  net  gain  on  early  extinguishment  of  debt  of
approximately  $3.1  million was  recorded  which is included in the net gain on
early  extinguishment  of debt on the  accompanying  consolidated  statement  of
income for the year ended December 31, 1999.

In  connection  with the loan  payoffs  discussed  above and the payoff of other
mortgage debt, the Company recorded a net gain on early  extinguishment  of debt
of  $984,000  for the year  ended  December  31,  1999.  This gain  consists  of
$3,115,000  of net gains on  retirement  of Senior  Notes (as  discussed  above)
offset by  $2,026,000  of losses due to  prepayment  penalties  and  $105,000 of
losses due to the  write-off of  unamortized  loan fees upon the early payoff of
four  loans.  These loans were  paid-off  early when more  favorable  terms were
obtained  through  new  financing  (discussed  above)  and  upon the sale of the
properties securing the loans.

The Company has an unsecured  line of credit  provided by a group of  commercial
banks (the "Credit Facility').  Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility
increased from  $63,519,000 at December 31, 1998, to $70,628,000 at December 31,
1999.  The increase was due to draws of  $177,683,000  for  acquisitions,  stock
repurchases,  purchases of the  Company's  Senior Notes,  and debt  refinancing,
offset by pay downs of  $170,574,000  generated  from proceeds from the sales of
properties  and cash from  operations.  In June 1999,  in order to increase  the
Company's  financial  flexibility,  the Credit Facility was modified to increase
the commitment from $100 million to $142.5 million.  The interest rate,  monthly
payments and maturity date of December 2000, remained  unchanged.  Subsequent to
December 31, 1999, the maturity date was extended to June 2002.

At December 31, 1999, the Company's total indebtedness  included fixed-rate debt
of $646,763,000 and  floating-rate  indebtedness of $250,595,000.  Approximately
65% of the Company's total assets,  comprising 102 properties,  is encumbered by
debt at December 31, 1999.

It is the  Company's  policy to manage its  exposure to  fluctuations  in market
interest  rates  through  the use of fixed rate debt  instruments  to the extent
possible.  At December 31, 1999,  approximately 28% of the Company's outstanding
debt,  including  amounts  borrowed under the Credit  Facility,  were subject to
variable  rates.  The Company may,  from time to time,  enter into interest rate
protection  agreements  intended  to hedge the cost of new  borrowings  that are
reasonably  assured of completion.  It is not the Company's  policy to engage in
hedging   activities  for  previously   outstanding   debt  instruments  or  for
speculative  purposes.  At December 31, 1999, the Company was not a party to any
open  interest  rate  protection  agreements  other than the  interest  rate cap
contract associated with the Secured Financing discussed above.
<PAGE>

Equity and Debt Offerings
In  January  1999,  the  Operating  Partnership  and the  Company  filed a shelf
registration  statement  with  the SEC (the  "January  1999  Shelf  Registration
Statement")  to  register  $300  million  of debt  securities  of the  Operating
Partnership  and to  carry  forward  the  remaining  $801.2  million  in  equity
securities  of the Company  from a November  1997 shelf  registration  statement
(declared  effective  by the SEC on December 18,  1997).  The January 1999 Shelf
Registration  Statement  was declared  effective by the SEC on January 25, 1999.
Therefore,  the Operating Partnership and the Company have the capacity pursuant
to the January 1999 Shelf Registration  Statement to issue up to $300 million in
debt  securities  and $801.2  million in equity  securities,  respectively.  The
Company  currently  has no plans to  issue  equity  or debt  under  these  shelf
registrations.

Stock Repurchases
In February  1999,  the Company's  Board of Directors  authorized the Company to
repurchase  up to 3.1  million  shares of its  outstanding  Common  Stock.  This
represented  approximately 10% of the Company's total outstanding  Common Stock.
In November 1999, the Company  announced that its Board of Directors had doubled
the size of the  repurchase  authorization  under  the  Company's  common  stock
repurchase  plan. The repurchase  plan was increased to 6.2 million  shares,  or
approximately  20%  of  the  Company's  total  outstanding  common  stock.  Such
purchases will be made from time to time in the open market or otherwise and the
timing will depend on market  conditions and other  factors.  As of December 31,
1999,  1,660,216  shares,   representing   approximately  27%  of  the  expanded
repurchase authorization,  have been repurchased.  In addition, during the third
quarter,  the Company  announced  that its Board of  Directors  had  approved an
expansion of the stock repurchase  program to include preferred stock as well as
common stock. The Company is authorized to repurchase up to 15% of its preferred
stock, or 1,725,000  shares. In December 1999, the Company  repurchased  170,000
shares of preferred stock.

Development Alliances
The  Company  currently  has 3  development  alliances  for the  development  of
approximately  885,000  square  feet of  office,  office/flex  and  distribution
properties and 1,614  multifamily units in Colorado,  Texas, New Jersey,  Kansas
and  Michigan.  As of December 31, 1999,  the Company has an investment in these
development  projects of  approximately  $33  million.  Under these  development
alliances,  the Company  has certain  rights to  purchase  the  properties  upon
completion of development over the next five years. In addition, the Company has
loaned  approximately  $36.4 million  (including accrued interest) under another
development  alliance to continue the  build-out of a 1,200 acre  master-planned
development in Denver, Colorado.

Inflation
Substantially  all of the  leases  at the  office/flex,  industrial  and  retail
Properties  provide  for  pass-through  to tenants of certain  operating  costs,
including real estate taxes,  common area maintenance  expenses,  and insurance.
Leases at the multifamily  properties  generally  provide for an initial term of
one  month or one year and allow for rent  adjustments  at the time of  renewal.
Leases at the  office  Properties  typically  provide  for rent  adjustment  and
pass-through of certain operating  expenses during the term of the lease. All of
these  provisions  may permit  the  Company to  increase  rental  rates or other
charges to tenants in response to rising prices and  therefore,  serve to reduce
the Company's exposure to the adverse effects of inflation.

Forward Looking Statements; Factors That May Affect Operating Results
This Annual Report  contains  forward looking  statements  within the meaning of
Section 27A of the  Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding the Company's expectations,
hopes, intentions,  beliefs and strategies regarding the future. Forward looking
statements include statements regarding potential acquisitions,  the anticipated
performance of future acquisitions, recently completed acquisitions and existing
properties,  and statements  regarding the Company's financing  activities.  All
forward  looking  statements  included in this document are based on information
available  to the Company on the date  hereof.  It is important to note that the
Company's actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied in
such forward  looking  statements.  A more  detailed  discussion of factors that
could cause actual  results to differ  materially are set forth in the Company's
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Qualitative and Quantitative Information About Market Risk

Interest Rates
The  Company's  primary  market risk  exposure  is to changes in interest  rates
obtainable  on its  mortgage  loans  receivable  and its secured  and  unsecured
borrowings.  The Company does not believe that changes in market  interest rates
will have a material impact on the performance or fair value of its portfolio of
mortgage loans receivable.

It is the  Company's  policy to manage its  exposure to  fluctuations  in market
interest rates for its borrowings through the use of fixed rate debt instruments
to  the  extent  that  reasonably  favorable  rates  are  obtainable  with  such
arrangements. In order to maximize financial flexibility when selling properties
and minimize potential prepayment penalties on fixed rate loans, the Company has
also entered into variable rate debt arrangements.  Approximately 28% and 20% of
the Company's  outstanding  debt,  including  amounts  borrowed under the Credit
Facility,  were  subject  to  variable  rates at  December  31,  1999 and  1998,
respectively.  In addition,  the average  interest  rate on the  Company's  debt
increased  from 7.08% at December 31, 1998 to 7.16% at December  31,  1999.  The
Company reviews  interest rate exposure in the portfolio  quarterly in an effort
to minimize the risk of interest  rate  fluctuations.  The Company does not have
any  other  material  market-sensitive  financial  instruments.  It is  not  the
Company's policy to engage in hedging activities for previously outstanding debt
instruments or for speculative or trading purposes.

The Company may enter into forward  interest  rate,  or similar,  agreements  to
hedge specific  anticipated debt issuances where management believes the risk of
adverse  changes in market rates is significant.  Under a forward  interest rate
agreement, if the referenced interest rate increases, the Company is entitled to
a receipt in  settlement  of the agreement  that  economically  would offset the
higher  financing  cost of the debt  issued.  If the  referenced  interest  rate
decreases, the Company makes payment in settlement of the agreement, creating an
expense that  economically  would offset the reduced  financing cost of the debt
issued.  At  December  31,  1999,  the  Company  was not a party to any  forward
interest  rate or similar  agreements  other than the interest rate cap contract
associated with the Secured Financing loan discussed above.

The table below provides  information about the Company's financial  instruments
that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table
presents  principal cash flows and related  weighted  average  interest rates by
expected  maturity dates.  Weighted average variable rates are based on rates in
effect at the reporting date.

                                               Expected Maturity Date
                      -------------------------------------------------------------------------

                         2000        2001        2002         2003        2004     Thereafter      Total     Fair Value
                                                               (in thousands)

<S>                   <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
Secured Fixed         $   61,441  $   15,435  $  14,301    $   37,849  $  27,791   $   398,796  $  555,613   $  555,613
Average interest           6.83%      7.93%       7.46%         7.64%      7.38%         6.80%       6.94%
rate

Secured Variable      $   41,402  $    7,100  $       -    $        -  $  97,600   $       -    $  146,102   $  146,102
Average interest           8.41%      8.50%           -             -      6.53%           -         7.16%
rate

Unsecured Fixed       $        -  $       -   $       -    $        -  $       -   $    91,150  $   91,150   $   91,150
Average interest               -          -           -             -          -         7.63%       7.63%
rate

Unsecured Variable    $   70,628  $        -  $  33,865    $        -  $       -   $         -  $  104,493   $  104,493
Average interest           7.75%           -       8.25%            -          -             -       7.91%
rate


The Company  believes that the interest  rates given in the table for fixed rate
borrowings  approximate  the  rates  the  Company  could  currently  obtain  for
instruments  of similar  terms and  maturities  and that the fair values of such
instruments approximate carrying value at December 31, 1999.

A change of 1/8% in the index rate to which the Company's  variable rate debt is
tied would change the annual interest incurred by the Company by $313,000, based
upon the balances outstanding on variable rate instruments at December 31, 1999.
</TABLE>



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission