<PAGE> 1
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST , 1997
REGISTRATION NO. 333-
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MARYLAND 52-1891908
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
OR ORGANIZATION)
</TABLE>
------------------------
115 CALLE DE INDUSTRIAS, SUITE 201
SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA 92672
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
------------------------
ROBERT A. ALTER
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
115 CALLE DE INDUSTRIAS, SUITE 201
SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA 92672
(714) 361-3900
(NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS)
------------------------
COPIES TO:
LAURA B. HUNTER, ESQ.
ROGER M. COHEN, ESQ.
BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
4675 MACARTHUR COURT, SUITE 1000
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660
(714) 752-7535
------------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment
plans, please check the following box. [ ]
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box. [X]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
If delivery of the Prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. [ ]
------------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
==============================================================================================
PROPOSED MAXIMUM AMOUNT
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF SECURITIES AGGREGATE OF REGISTRATION
TO BE REGISTERED OFFERING PRICE(1) FEE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value...................
Shares of Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value................
Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock or Preferred
Stock...................................................
Total........................................... $325,000,000 $98,485
==============================================================================================
</TABLE>
(1) Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(o).
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A),
MAY DETERMINE.
================================================================================
<PAGE> 2
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR
MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR
THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE
UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS
OF ANY SUCH STATE.
PROSPECTUS
$325,000,000
[SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC. LOGO]
COMMON STOCK
PREFERRED STOCK
WARRANTS
------------------------
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. ("Sunstone" or the "Company") may from time
to time offer in one or more series or classes (i) shares of its common stock,
par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), (ii) shares of its preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Preferred Stock"), and/or (iii) warrants
to purchase Preferred Stock or Common Stock (the "Warrants") in amounts, at
prices and on terms to be determined at the time of offering, with an aggregate
public offering price of up to $325,000,000. The Common Stock, Preferred Stock,
and Warrants (collectively, the "Offered Securities") may be offered, separately
or together, in separate series or classes, in amounts, at prices and on terms
to be set forth in one or more supplements to the Prospectus (each a "Prospectus
Supplement").
The specific terms of the Offered Securities in respect to which this
Prospectus is being delivered will be set forth in a future Prospectus
Supplement and will include (i) in the case of Common Stock, the specific title
and stated value, any voting, dividend and other rights, and public offering
price; (ii) in the case of Preferred Stock, the specific title and stated value,
any dividend, liquidation, redemption, conversion, voting and other rights,
share and price adjustment mechanisms, and public offering price; and (iii) in
the case of Warrants, the term, exercise price, share and price adjustment
mechanisms, voting and other rights, detachability, and public offering price.
In addition, such specific terms may include limitations on direct or beneficial
ownership and restrictions on transfer of the Offered Securities, in each case
as may be appropriate to preserve the status of the Company as a real estate
investment trust ("REIT") for United States federal income tax purposes.
Each Prospectus Supplement will also contain information, where applicable,
about United States federal income tax considerations relating specifically to,
and any listing on a securities exchange of, the Offered Securities covered by
such Prospectus Supplement.
The Offered Securities may be offered directly, through agents designated
from time to time by the Company, or to or through underwriters or dealers. If
any agents or underwriters are involved in the sale of any of the Offered
Securities, their names, and any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or
discount arrangement between or among them, will be set forth, or will be
calculable from the information set forth, in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement. See "Plan of Distribution." No Offered Securities may be sold
without delivery of the applicable Prospectus Supplement describing the method
and terms of the offering of such series or class of Offered Securities.
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 5 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS
THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE OFFERED SECURITIES
OFFERED HEREBY.
------------------------
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PASSED UPON
THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY
IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
------------------------
THIS PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE USED TO CONSUMMATE SALES OF OFFERED SECURITIES UNLESS
ACCOMPANIED BY A PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT. THE DELIVERY IN ANY JURISDICTION OF THIS
PROSPECTUS, TOGETHER WITH A PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT RELATING TO SPECIFIC OFFERED
SECURITIES, SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER IN SUCH JURISDICTION OF ANY OTHER
OFFERED SECURITIES COVERED BY THIS PROSPECTUS BUT NOT DESCRIBED IN SUCH
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.
------------------------
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS SEPTEMBER , 1997.
<PAGE> 3
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company is subject to the information requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in accordance
therewith files reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Such reports, proxy
statements and other information filed by the Company can be inspected and
copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission at Room
1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at
regional offices of the Commission located at 7 World Trade Center, 13th Floor,
New York, New York 10048 and Citicorp Corp. Center, 500 West Madison Street,
Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511. Copies of such material can be
obtained by mail from the Public Reference Section of the Commission, 450 Fifth
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates.
The Company files information electronically with the Commission, and the
Commission maintains a Web Site that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically
with the Commission, such as the Company, and the address is http://www.sec.gov.
The Company's Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the
"NYSE"), and reports, proxy statements and other information concerning the
Company can be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20
Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
The Company has filed with the Commission a Registration Statement on Form
S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, with respect to the Offered
Securities. This Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement, does
not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement and
the exhibits. For further information concerning the Company and the Offered
Securities, reference is made to the Registration Statement and the exhibits and
schedules filed therewith, which may be obtained as described above.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE
The following documents, which have been filed with the Commission, are
hereby incorporated by reference:
1. Annual Report (i) on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996; and (ii) on Form 10-K/A filed with the Commission on
March 24, 1997;
2. Quarterly Reports (i) on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1997
and June 30, 1997 and (ii) on Form 10-Q/A filed with the Commission on
August 26, 1997;
3. Current Reports (i) on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 9,
1997, March 26, 1997, May 1, 1997, June 26, 1997, July 17, 1997 and
August 14, 1997; and (ii) on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on
January 7, 1997 and August 22, 1997;
4. The description of the Common Stock of the Company included in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed with the Commission
on June 26, 1995; and on Form 8-A/A, filed with the Commission on July
19, 1996.
In addition, all reports and other documents subsequently filed by the
Company with the Commission pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act after the date of this Prospectus and prior to the termination of the
offering shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and
to be a part hereof from the date of the filing of such documents (such
documents, and the documents enumerated above, being herein referred to as
"Incorporated Documents"; provided however, that the documents enumerated above
or subsequently filed by the Company pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act prior to the filing of the Company's next Annual Report on Form
10-K with the Commission shall not be Incorporated Documents or be incorporated
by reference in this Prospectus or be a part hereof from and after any such
filing of an Annual Report on Form 10-K). Any statement contained in a document
incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to
be modified or superseded for purposes of this Prospectus to the extent that a
statement contained herein (or in any other subsequently filed document which
also is or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein) modifies or
supersedes such statement. Any statements so modified or superseded shall not be
deemed to constitute a part of this Prospectus, except as so modified or
superseded.
The Company will provide without charge to each person to whom this
Prospectus is delivered, upon written or oral request of such person, a copy of
any or all of the documents referred to above which have been or may be
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus (other than certain exhibits to
such documents). Requests for such documents should be directed to Sunstone
Hotel Investors, Inc., 115 Calle de Industrias, Suite 201, San Clemente,
California 92672, Attention: Secretary (telephone: (714) 361-3900).
2
<PAGE> 4
THE COMPANY
The Company, a Maryland corporation, is a self-administered REIT that owns
mid-priced and upscale hotels in the mid and western United States through
Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
"Partnership"), of which the Company is the sole general partner. The hotels
operate under nationally recognized franchises, including Courtyard by
Marriott(R), Doubletree(R) Hotel, Hampton Inn(R), Holiday Inn(R), Holiday Inn(R)
Hotel & Suites, Holiday Inn Express(TM), Holiday Inn Select(TM), Comfort
Suites(R), Residence Inn(R) by Marriott and Hawthorn Suites. As of August 15,
1997, the Company owned an approximately 88.8% partnership interest in the
Partnership and the Partnership owned 33 hotels, with an aggregate of 5,071
rooms in seven states, including Arizona (4 hotels), California (13), Colorado
(6), New Mexico (1), Oregon (2), Utah (2), and Washington (5).
In order for the Company to qualify as a REIT for United States federal
income tax purposes, neither the Company nor the Partnership can operate hotels.
Therefore, the Partnership leases the hotels to Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc.,
a Colorado corporation (the "Lessee") pursuant to percentage leases with an
initial term of ten years (the "Percentage Leases"), which provide for rent
payments based principally on a percentage of room revenues at the hotels. The
Lessee pays the franchise fees, management fees and certain other operating
expenses of the hotels. The Lessee is owned by Robert A. Alter, Chairman and
President of the Company, and Charles L. Biederman, director and Executive Vice
President of the Company. The hotels are managed by Sunstone Hotel Management,
Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Management Company") pursuant to a management
agreement between the Lessee and the Management Company for a fee equal to 2% of
gross revenues of the hotels (plus reimbursement of accounting costs). The
Management Company is wholly-owned by Mr. Alter.
On August 5, 1997, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with
affiliates of Westbrook Partners, L.L.C., a real estate investment firm, to
acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Kahler Realty Corporation, a
Minnesota corporation ("Kahler") from Westbrook Real Estate Fund I, L.P. and
Westbrook Real Estate Co-Investment Partnership I, L.P. (collectively,
"Westbrook") for an estimated purchase price of approximately $322 million (the
"Kahler Acquisition"). Kahler owns and operates 17 hotels with 4,255 rooms,
principally in two markets, the intermountain region of Utah, Idaho, Montana and
Arizona (11 hotels) and Rochester, Minnesota (four hotels). The largest number
of rooms are concentrated in Rochester, Minnesota with four hotels and 1,329
rooms and in the Salt Lake City area of Utah, with five hotels and 1,306 rooms.
Nine of the hotels are operated independently, while the balance is operated
under Sheraton, Hilton, Holiday Inn, Best Western and Quality Inn franchises.
The acquisition of Kahler will almost double the number of hotel rooms currently
owned or operated by the Company.
The consideration to be paid for Kahler consists of approximately $95
million cash, $25 million of newly issued Preferred Stock and $32 million of
newly issued Common Stock of the Company and the assumption of approximately
$170 million in debt, approximately $40 million of which will be repaid to
Westbrook at the closing. The remaining debt may be kept in place, retired or
replaced following the closing. The purchase price may be increased by as much
as $16.5 million following the closing pursuant to a formula based on the 1999
earnings of the Kahler assets. Any additional purchase price may be paid at the
Company's option in cash or shares of Common Stock. The transaction is expected
to close during the fourth quarter of 1997; however, there can be no assurance
that the Kahler Acquisition will close in the anticipated time frame or at all.
Any delay in closing the Kahler Acquisition following October 15, 1997 will
adversely effect the Company's cash flow.
The Company's principal executive office is located at 115 Calle de
Industrias, Suite 201, San Clemente, California 92672; telephone number (714)
361-3900.
The Company's Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "SSI."
3
<PAGE> 5
USE OF PROCEEDS
The Company intends to invest the net proceeds from any sale of the Offered
Securities in the Partnership in exchange for an additional ownership interest
in the Partnership. Unless otherwise indicated in a future Prospectus
Supplement, the Partnership intends to use the net proceeds from any sale of
Offered Securities for general corporate purposes, including, without
limitation, the acquisition and development of additional hotels, the
maintenance and renovation of currently owned hotels, and the repayment of debt.
For instance, the net proceeds from any sale of the Offered Securities may be
used to acquire Kahler. Should this occur, the Kahler assets will be contributed
to the Partnership in exchange for additional ownership interest in the
Partnership. Pending application of the net proceeds, such net proceeds may be
invested in interest-bearing accounts and short-term, interest-bearing
securities, in a manner consistent with the Company's ability to qualify for
taxation as a REIT. Such investments may include, for example, government and
government agency securities, certificates of deposit, interest-bearing bank
deposits and mortgage loan participations.
4
<PAGE> 6
RISK FACTORS
In evaluating the Company's business, prospective investors should
carefully consider the factors set forth in this section in addition to other
information set forth in the accompanying Prospectus Supplement before making an
investment decision with respect to the Offered Securities. This Prospectus may
contain forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties, and
actual results could differ materially from those discussed in any such
forwardlooking statements. Certain of the factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially are discussed below.
IMPEDIMENTS TO GROWTH AND INCREASING CASH AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION
The Company's ability to increase cash available for distribution on its
Common Stock ("Cash Available for Distribution") will depend significantly on
the Company's ability to acquire or develop additional hotels at attractive
prices. Risks associated with this growth strategy include:
Competition For Future Acquisitions. There will be competition for
investment opportunities in mid-price and upscale hotels from entities organized
for purposes substantially similar to the Company's objectives as well as other
purchasers of hotels. The Company is competing for such hotel investment
opportunities with entities which have substantially greater financial resources
than the Company or better relationships with franchisors, sellers or lenders.
These entities may also generally be able to accept more risk than the Company
prudently can manage. Competition may generally reduce the number of suitable
hotel investment opportunities offered to the Company and increase the
bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell.
Renovation and Redevelopment Risks. The Company faces risks arising from
its strategy of acquiring hotels in need of substantial renovation or
redevelopment, particularly the risk that the cost or time to complete the
renovation or redevelopment will exceed the budgeted amount. Such delays or cost
overruns may arise from shortages of materials or skilled labor, a change in the
scope of the original project, the need to comply with building code or other
legal requirements, the discovery of structural or other latent defects with a
hotel once construction has commenced and other risks inherent in the
construction process. In particular, renovation and redevelopment must comply
with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA"), which provides
that all public accommodations meet certain federal requirements related to
access and use by disabled persons. The Company may be required to make
substantial modifications at the hotels to comply with the ADA. Delays or cost
overruns in connection with renovations or redevelopments could have a material
adverse effect on Cash Available for Distribution.
Development Risks. A component of the Company's growth strategy is to
develop new hotels in markets where room supply and other competitive factors
justify new construction or to purchase such hotels from unaffiliated developers
after they have been completed. New project development will increase the
Company's indebtedness and is subject to a number of other risks, including
risks of construction delays or cost overruns, the risk that required zoning,
occupancy and other government permits might not be obtained, and the risk that
projects might not be completed. Additional risks of development projects
include the risks associated with effectively marketing a hotel in order to
ramp-up occupancy at projected room rates after the hotel has been opened. Any
failure to complete a development project in a timely manner and within budget
or to ramp-up occupancy after completion of the project could have a material
adverse effect on Cash Available for Distribution.
TOTAL DEPENDENCE ON THE LESSEE AND PAYMENTS UNDER THE PERCENTAGE LEASES
Certain tax rules relating to the qualification of a REIT prohibit the
Company and the Partnership from operating hotels. Therefore, the Partnership
enters into Percentage Leases with the Lessee, and the Lessee operates the
hotels and pays rent to the Partnership based, in large part, on the revenues
from the hotels. Consequently, the Company relies entirely on the Lessee to
effectively operate the Company's hotels in a manner which generates sufficient
cash flow to enable the Lessee to timely make the rent payments under the
applicable Percentage Leases. Ineffective operation of the hotels may result in
the Lessee's being unable to pay rent at the higher tier level necessary for the
Company to fund distributions to shareholders because payment of base rent alone
is insufficient for such purposes. In the event that all or a portion of such
higher
5
<PAGE> 7
tier rent is not received by the Partnership, the Company may not be able to
make such distributions to its shareholders. There can be no assurance that the
Company will receive such higher tier rent from the Lessee or that the Lessee
will even be able to pay base rent. The Lessee controls the daily operations of
the hotels under the Percentage Leases, which have non-cancelable initial terms
of ten years. The Company selected the Lessee without consideration of other
lessees because Mr. Alter and Mr. Biederman, who own the Lessee, owned and were
involved in the management of a number of the hotels contributed to the Company
in connection with its initial public offering in 1995 (the "IPO") and because
Mr. Alter and Mr. Biederman own significant Units in the Partnership and options
to acquire Common Stock of the Company, and therefore have an incentive to cause
the Lessee to maximize rents. Except as set forth in the Percentage Leases,
neither the Company nor the Partnership has the authority to require the Lessee
to operate the hotels in a manner that results in a maximization of rent to the
Company. Other than working capital to operate the hotels, the Lessee only has
nominal assets, which will likely be insufficient to satisfy any claims the
Company may have if the Lessee defaults under the Percentage Leases. Mr. Alter
and Mr. Biederman have entered into an agreement (the "Third Party Pledge
Agreement"), whereby the obligations of the Lessee under the Percentage Leases
are secured with a pledge of Mr. Alter's and Mr. Biederman's Units in the
Partnership equal in value to four months of initial base rent for each hotel.
The Third Party Pledge Agreement has been amended, however, to limit the total
number of Units that Mr. Alter or Mr. Biederman must pledge to the current
number Mr. Alter owns. This may limit the Company's ability to recover in full
for any claims it may have against the Lessee for defaults under the Percentage
Leases. The amendment to the Third Party Pledge Agreement also subordinated the
Company's lien on the majority of Mr. Alter's Units to the lien in favor of an
institutional lender providing a working capital line to the Lessee guaranteed
by Mr. Alter and secured by a pledge of a significant portion of Mr. Alter's
Units. The obligations of the Lessee under the Percentage Leases are not secured
by any additional security deposits or guarantees by third parties. The Lessee
had a net operating loss of $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1996
and net income of $365,000 for the six months ended June 30, 1997. The Lessee
was able to meet its rent obligations under the Percentage Leases during these
periods.
MULTI-HOTEL ACQUISITION RISKS
The Company has increasingly emphasized, and intends to continue to
emphasize, acquisitions of multiple hotels in a single transaction in order to
reduce acquisition expenses per hotel and enable the Company to more rapidly
expand its hotel portfolio. Consistent with this emphasis, in August 1997, the
Company announced the Kahler Acquisition which, if consummated, will almost
double the Company's current room total. Multiple-hotel acquisitions, such as
the Kahler Acquisition are, however, more complex than single-hotel acquisitions
and the risk that a multiple-hotel acquisition will not close may be greater
than in a single-hotel acquisition. Such portfolio acquisitions whether by stock
or asset purchase may also result in the Company owning hotels in geographically
dispersed markets. This geographic diversity will place significant additional
demands on the Company's ability to manage such operations. In addition, the
Company's costs for a portfolio acquisition that does not close are generally
greater than for an individual hotel acquisition. If the Company fails to close
hotel acquisitions, its ability to increase Cash Available for Distribution will
be limited. See "-- Dependence on Acquisitions to Increase Cash Available for
Distribution." Another risk associated with multiple-hotel acquisitions is that
a seller may require that a group of hotels be purchased as a package, even
though one or more of the hotels in the package does not meet the Company's
investment criteria. In such cases, the Company may purchase the group of hotels
with the intent to re-sell those which do not meet its criteria. This occurred
in the first quarter of 1996 with the acquisition of the six Cypress Inn Hotels
in Oregon and Washington, two of which were re-sold by the Company within three
months of the acquisition. It is anticipated that any hotel acquired in the
Kahler Acquisition that does not fit the geographic or operating parameters of
the Company will likewise be sold. In such circumstances, however, there is no
assurance as to how quickly the Company could sell such hotels or the price at
which they could be sold. Such hotels might reduce Cash Available for
Distribution if they operate at a loss during the time the Company holds them
for sale or if the Company sells them at a loss. In addition, any gains on the
sale of such hotels within four years of the date of acquisition would be
subject to a 100% tax. The Company may finance multi-hotel acquisitions by
issuing shares of Common Stock or Partnership Units which are convertible into
Common Stock. Such issuances may have an adverse effect on the market price of
the
6
<PAGE> 8
Common Stock. See "-- Adverse Effect of Shares Available for Future Issuance and
Sale on Market Price of Common Stock."
FAILURE TO MANAGE RAPID GROWTH; FAILURE TO SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE KAHLER
To successfully implement its acquisition strategy, the Company must
integrate the hotels acquired since the IPO and any other subsequently acquired
hotels into its existing operations. Since the closing of the IPO, the Company's
portfolio of hotel properties has increased dramatically. During such period,
the Company also entered geographic markets where it previously did not have any
properties. As a result, the consolidation of functions and integration of
departments, systems and procedures of acquired properties with the Company's
existing operations presents a significant management challenge, and the failure
to integrate such properties into the Company's management and operating
structures could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and
financial condition of the Company.
The acquisition of Kahler will place significant demands on the Company's
management and other resources. There can be no assurances that the Kahler
hotels and other business operations can be integrated successfully, that there
will be any operating efficiencies between the hotels or that the combined
businesses can be operated profitably. The failure to integrate and operate
Kahler successfully could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business and future prospects. Also, certain of the hotels currently owned by
Kahler are in the same geographic regions as those of the Company and may,
therefore, compete with the Company's hotels. There can be no assurance that the
Kahler Acquisition will not adversely affect the operations, revenues or
prospects of the Company's hotels located in such geographic areas.
GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION OF KAHLER
The concentration of four hotels with 1,329 rooms in Rochester, Minnesota
and five hotels with 1,306 rooms in and around Salt Lake City, Utah, makes
Kahler dependent on factors such as the local economy, local competition,
increases in local real and personal property tax rates and local catastrophes.
The results of operations of the hotels in Rochester, Minnesota, are also
dependent on the level of demand generated by the Mayo Clinic for hotel
accommodations by patients and by medical conferences organized by the Mayo
Clinic. Significant disruption in these local markets that result in decreased
operating performance of these hotels will have a material adverse effect on the
Company's results of operations and Cash Available for Distribution.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND CERTAIN OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Because of Mr. Alter's and Mr. Biederman's ownership in and positions with
the Company and the Lessee and Mr. Alter's ownership of the Management Company,
there are inherent conflicts of interest between the Lessee, the Management
Company and the Company in the leasing, acquisition, disposition, operation and
management of the Company's hotels. Accordingly, the interests of shareholders
may not have been, and in the future may not be, reflected fully in all
decisions made or actions taken by the officers and directors of the Company. In
the event revenues from the Company's hotels increase significantly over prior
periods and operating expenses with respect thereto are less than historical or
projected operating expenses, the Lessee could disproportionately benefit. In
addition, there may be conflicts of interest in connection with the sale of
certain hotels. Unrealized gain from the sale to the Company of certain hotels
contributed to the Company in connection with its IPO is specially allocated to
Mr. Alter and Mr. Biederman and any sale of such hotels by the Partnership may
cause adverse tax consequences to them. In addition, the reduction of mortgage
indebtedness by the Partnership at any time below certain levels would create
adverse tax consequences to Mr. Alter and Mr. Biederman. These conflicts may
result in decisions relating to the sale of certain hotels and/or the incurrence
or repayment of indebtedness which do not reflect solely the interests of the
Company and the shareholders. In addition, the Company will generally be
required under the Percentage Leases to pay a lease termination fee to the
Lessee if the Company elects to sell a hotel and not replace it with another
hotel. The payment of a termination fee to the Lessee, which is owned by Mr.
Alter and Mr. Biederman, may also result in decisions regarding the sale of a
hotel which do not reflect solely the interests of the Company and its
shareholders.
7
<PAGE> 9
RELIANCE ON MR. ALTER AND OTHER KEY PERSONNEL
The Company's future success and its ability to manage future growth
depends in large part upon the efforts of its senior management and its ability
to attract and retain key executive officers and other highly qualified
personnel. In particular, the Company places substantial reliance on the hotel
industry knowledge and experience and the continued services of Robert A. Alter,
the Company's Chairman and President. Competition for such personnel is intense
and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting
and retaining such personnel. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the
Company's senior management will be able to successfully execute or implement
the Company's growth and operating strategies. In addition, the loss of Mr.
Alter's services or the Company's inability to attract and retain highly
qualified personnel may adversely affect the operations of the Company and Cash
Available for Distribution.
HOTEL INDUSTRY RISKS
Operating Risks and Competition. Many of the Company's competitors have
substantially greater marketing and financial resources than the Company and the
Lessee. In addition, the Company's hotels are subject to all operating risks
common to the hotel industry. The hotel industry has experienced volatility in
the past, as have the Company's hotels. Hotel industry risks include, among
other things, competition from other hotels; over-building in the hotel industry
which has adversely affected occupancy, average daily rate ("ADR") and revenue
per available room ("REVPAR") increases in operating costs due to inflation and
other factors, which may not necessarily be offset by increased room rates;
dependence on business and commercial travelers and tourism; strikes and other
labor disturbances of hotel employees for hotels owned by the Company; increases
in energy costs and other expenses of travel; and adverse effects of general and
local economic conditions. These factors could decrease room revenues of the
hotels and adversely affect the Lessee's ability to make payments of rent under
the Percentage Leases to the Company, and therefore reduce Cash Available for
Distribution.
Seasonality of Hotel Business and the Company's Hotels. The hotel industry
is seasonal in nature. Generally, revenues for the Company's hotels are greater
in the first and third quarters than in the second and fourth quarters. This
seasonality can be expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in the Company's
Percentage Lease revenues which may be insufficient to provide all of the Cash
Available for Distribution necessary to pay dividends in a given quarter.
Increased Competition Resulting From Overbuilding. The hotel industry has
historically experienced cycles of overbuilding in certain geographic markets
and product segments. Such overbuilding increases competition for hotel guests,
resulting in lower occupancies and lower ADRs, thereby reducing the
profitability of the hotels affected by the increased competition. While the
Company's investment strategy is to acquire underperforming hotels or hotels
where there are significant barriers to entry, there can be no assurance that
the current hotel development activities, particularly in the Company's limited
service segment, will not create additional significant competition for the
Company's hotels. Such increased competition would reduce the revenue generated
by the Lessee, thus reducing percentage rent paid to the Company and Cash
Available for Distribution.
IMPACT OF INCREASED OPERATING COSTS AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Hotels in general, including the Company's hotels, have an ongoing need for
renovations and other capital improvements, including periodic replacement of
furniture, fixtures and equipment. In this regard, the Company may spend
significant dollars renovating, repositioning or rebranding a number of the
Kahler hotels to maximize financial performance; however, the Company is unable
to estimate the amounts to be expended at this time. In addition, the franchise
agreements under which the Company's hotels are operated impose specified
operating standards and may permit the franchisor to condition the continuation
of a franchise agreement on the completion of capital improvements. Under the
terms of the Percentage Leases, the Company is also obligated to pay the cost of
certain capital expenditures at its hotels and to pay for furniture, fixtures
and equipment. The ability of the Company to fund these and other capital
expenditures and periodic replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment will
depend in part on the financial performance of the
8
<PAGE> 10
Lessee and the hotels. If these expenses exceed the Company's estimate, the
additional expenses could have an adverse effect on Cash Available for
Distribution. Furthermore, any inability or failure to fund these expenditures
could have a material adverse effect on occupancy rates, ADRs and REVPAR and may
constitute a breach under the franchise agreements.
HAWTHORN SUITES DEVELOPMENT RISKS
The Company entered into a five-year master development agreement with U.S.
Franchise Systems, Inc. and Hawthorn Suites Franchising, Inc. on March 10, 1997
to permit the Company to franchise properties operated under the Hawthorn Suites
brand. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will have the right to obtain
franchise licenses in several major urban markets on the West Coast. Under the
agreement, certain development rights may terminate if the Company does not
establish a certain minimum number of licenses for Hawthorn Suites during each
year. This timetable may cause the Company to overcommit to building and owning
Hawthorn Suites at the expense of other growth opportunities. As a franchise
with a limited number of hotels currently operating, the Company's focus on this
brand subjects it to greater risks than a more diversified approach.
FRANCHISE RISKS
Thirty-one Company's hotels are operated pursuant to franchise or license
agreements and additional hotels may be, including seven of the Kahler hotels,
or become subject to franchise arrangements. The Lessee will hold the franchise
or license agreements for the hotels and will be responsible for complying with
the terms of these agreements. Such franchise or license arrangements are often
helpful in providing marketing services and room reservations to hotels, but
these arrangements also impose financial obligations on hotels generally related
to maintaining the condition of hotels and the payment of franchise fees.
Continuation of such franchises is subject to specified operating standards and
other terms and conditions. Franchisors periodically inspect franchised hotels
to confirm compliance. In addition, franchisors may require the Company to fund
significant capital improvements to the hotels in the future to maintain such
franchises. The failure of a franchisee to maintain standards or adhere to terms
and conditions imposed by the franchisor may result in the loss of a license or
termination of the franchise or damages as a result of the breach. It is
possible that a franchisor could condition the continuation of a franchise on
the completion of capital improvements or replacements of furniture, fixtures
and equipment which the Board of Directors determines are too expensive or
otherwise unwarranted in light of general economic conditions or operating
results or prospects of the affected hotel. The loss of a franchise could have a
material adverse effect upon the operation, financing or value of the hotel
subject to the franchise because of the loss of associated name recognition,
marketing support and centralized reservation systems. There can be no assurance
that an alternative franchise arrangement can be obtained or that significant
expenditures might not be imposed as a condition to obtaining a new franchise.
The loss of a franchise for one or more of the hotels could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's revenues under the Percentage Leases and Cash
Available for Distribution to its shareholders.
DEPENDENCE ON ACQUISITIONS TO INCREASE CASH AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION
The Company's success in implementing its growth plan will depend
significantly on the Company's ability to acquire additional hotels at
attractive prices. After the ramp-up of certain of the hotels which were
recently redeveloped or renovated and repositioned or which are expected to be
redeveloped or renovated and repositioned in the near future, internal growth in
ADR and occupancy for the hotels is not expected to provide as much growth in
Cash Available for Distribution as will acquisition of additional hotels.
However, since the Company intends to borrow funds to purchase, redevelop or
renovate and reposition hotels, the Company will be subject to the risks
associated with increased indebtedness, such as paying debt service even if cash
flow from such additional hotels is not sufficient to cover such costs.
FAILURE TO MAINTAIN REIT STATUS
The Company intends to operate so as to be taxed as a REIT under Sections
856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). As long
as the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT,
9
<PAGE> 11
with certain exceptions, the Company will not be taxed at the corporate level on
its taxable income that is distributed to its shareholders. A REIT is subject to
a number of organizational and operational requirements, including requirements
as to the nature of its income and assets, distribution requirements, diversity
of stock ownership requirements and record-keeping requirements. While the
Company intends to satisfy all of these requirements for treatment as a REIT, it
is possible that the Company may in the future fail to satisfy one or more of
these requirements. Failure to qualify as a REIT would render the Company
subject to tax (including any applicable minimum tax) on its taxable income at
regular corporate rates and distributions to the shareholders in any such year
would not be deductible by the Company. Unless entitled to relief under certain
Code provisions, the Company also would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT
for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was
lost. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be
subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property.
In order for the Company to be taxed as a REIT, the Partnership must be
classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. If the Partnership
were to be taxable as a corporation, because the Company's ownership interest in
the Partnership constitutes more than 10% of the Partnership's voting securities
and exceeds 5% of the value of the Company's assets, the Company would cease to
qualify as a REIT. The imposition of corporate income tax on the Company and the
Partnership would substantially reduce the amount of Cash Available for
Distribution.
OWNERSHIP LIMITATION RESULTING IN LOSS OF REIT STATUS
In order for the Company to maintain its qualification as a REIT, not more
than 50% in value of its outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly,
by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain
entities). Furthermore, if any shareholder or group of shareholders of the
Lessee owns, actually or constructively, 10% or more of the stock of the
Company, the Lessee could become a related party tenant of the Partnership,
which likely would result in loss of REIT status for the Company. For the
purpose of preserving the Company's REIT qualification, the Company's Articles
of Incorporation prohibit direct or indirect ownership of more than 9.8% of the
outstanding shares of any class of the Company's stock by any person or group
(the "Ownership Limitation"). Generally, the capital stock owned by affiliated
owners will be aggregated for purposes of the Ownership Limitation. Subject to
certain exceptions, any transfer of Common or Preferred Stock that would prevent
the Company from continuing to qualify as a REIT under the Code will be
designated as "Shares-in-Trust" and transferred automatically to a trust (the
"Share Trust") effective on the day before the purported transfer of such Common
or Preferred Stock. The record holder of the Common or Preferred Stock that are
designated as Shares-in-Trust will be required to submit such number of Common
or Preferred Stock to the Share Trust and the beneficiary of the Share Trust
will be one or more charitable organizations that are named by the Company.
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT RISKS IN GENERAL
The Company's hotels will be subject to varying degrees of risk generally
incident to the ownership of real property. Income from the hotels may be
adversely affected by changes in national and local economic conditions, changes
in interest rates and in the availability, cost and terms of mortgage funds, the
impact of present or future environmental legislation and compliance with
environmental laws, the ongoing need for capital improvements, changes in real
estate tax rates and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules
(such as those requiring upgrades for disabled persons) and fiscal policies,
civil unrest, acts of God, including earthquakes, hurricanes and other natural
disasters (which may result in uninsured losses), acts of war, changes in zoning
laws, and other factors which are beyond the control of the Company. In
addition, real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and the ability of
the Company to vary its portfolio in response to changes in economic and other
conditions will be limited.
POSSIBLE LIABILITY RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and
regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may become
liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances
on, under or in such property. Such laws often impose liability without regard
to
10
<PAGE> 12
whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of
such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of hazardous or toxic
substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances when present,
may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such real property or
to borrow using such real property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the
disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic wastes may be liable for the costs
of removal or remediation of such wastes at the disposal or treatment facility,
regardless of whether such facility is owned or operated by such person. Other
federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations require abatement or
removal of certain asbestos containing materials in the event of demolition or
certain renovations or remodeling and govern emissions of and exposure to
asbestos fibers in the air. The operation and subsequent removal of certain
underground storage tanks also are regulated by federal and state laws.
DISTRIBUTION OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF CASH AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION;
DISTRIBUTIONS INCLUDE RETURN OF CAPITAL
Consistent with the Company's practice of acquiring properties in need of
renovation or redevelopment, the Company's annual distributions to shareholders
have constituted a high percentage of the Company's Cash Available for
Distribution. If this continues, the Company will retain little or no cash from
the rent payments under the Percentage Leases, and expenditures for additional
acquisitions or future capital improvements would have to be funded from
borrowings, or from proceeds from the sale of assets (including the hotels), or
debt or equity securities. In addition, a percentage of the estimated annual
distribution has constituted a return of capital rather than a distribution of
retained earnings. Consequently, there is a risk that the distribution rate has
been set too high and may not be sustainable.
ADVERSE EFFECT OF SHARES AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE AND SALE ON MARKET PRICE
OF COMMON STOCK
The Company's Articles of Incorporation authorize the Board of Directors to
issue up to 60,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 50,000,000 shares
of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. As of August 15, 1997,
the Board of Directors was able to reclassify and issue an aggregate of
approximately 24,700,000 unissued or unreserved shares of Common Stock and to
classify and issue all 10,000,000 unissued shares of Preferred Stock, of which
250,000 will be classified and issued in connection with the Kahler Acquisition.
The Company's acquisition strategy depends in part on access to additional
capital through sales and issuances of equity securities. The market price of
the Common Stock may be adversely affected by the availability for future sale
and issuance of such unissued and unreserved shares of Common Stock and
Preferred Stock and the consequent dilutive effect of such issuances.
In addition, the market price of the Common Stock may also be adversely
affected by the availability for future sale and issuance of approximately
2,562,560 shares of Common Stock that could be issued upon the redemption of
Units of the Partnership. The Company may at any time file a Registration
Statement on Form S-3 to give the limited partners of the Partnership the
ability to sell shares of Common Stock issued upon redemption of Units. In
addition, Westbrook will be granted certain registration rights in connection
with the shares being issued to them in the Kahler Acquisition.
RISK OF DILUTION
As hotel acquisition opportunities arise from time to time, the Company may
issue additional shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock to raise the capital
necessary to finance the hotel acquisitions or may issue Common Stock or
Preferred Stock (as is proposed in the Kahler Acquisition) or Partnership Units
which are redeemable on a one-to-one basis for Common Stock to acquire hotels.
Such issuances could result in dilution of shareholders' equity.
11
<PAGE> 13
DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK
The following summary description of Common Stock and Preferred Stock of
the Company is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to Maryland
law described herein, and to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the
Company (and any amendments or supplements thereto) which are filed as exhibits
to, or incorporated by reference in, the Registration Statement of which this
Prospectus is a part.
GENERAL
The Articles of Incorporation of the Company provide that the Company may
issue up to 60,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 50,000,000 shares
of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock, $0.01 par value per share. As of August 15, 1997, (i) 20,390,830 shares
of Common Stock were issued and outstanding, (ii) 1,000,000 shares of Common
Stock were reserved for issuance under the Company's Dividend Reinvestment and
Stock Purchase Plan, (iii) 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock were reserved for
issuance under the Company's 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, (iv) 150,000 shares of
Common Stock were reserved for issuance under the 1994 Directors Plan, and (v)
2,562,560 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon the conversion
of units of Partnership interest ("Units") into Common Stock (each Unit is
convertible into one share of Common Stock at the Unitholder's election). As of
August 15, 1997, no shares of Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.
The following description sets forth certain general terms and provisions
of the Common Stock to which any Prospectus Supplement may relate, including a
Prospectus Supplement providing that Common Stock will be issuable upon
conversion of Preferred Stock or upon the exercise of Warrants issued by the
Company. The Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "SSI."
ChaseMellon Shareholder Services LLC is the Company's registrar and transfer
agent for the Common Stock and Partnership Units.
COMMON STOCK
All shares of Common Stock offered hereby will, when issued, be duly
authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Subject to the preferential rights of
any other shares, series or class of shares of capital stock that may from time
to time cone into existence, and to the provisions of the Company's Articles of
Incorporation regarding owning shares in excess of the Ownership Limitation,
holders of Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends on such Common
Stock if, as and when authorized and declared by the Board of Directors of the
Company out of assets legally available therefor and to share ratably in the
assets of the Company legally available for distribution to its shareholders in
the event of its liquidation, dissolution or winding-up after payment of, or
adequate provision for, all known debts and liabilities of the Company. The
Company intends to continue its practice of paying regular quarterly dividends
to the holders of its Common Stock.
Holders of the Company's Common Stock can elect to participate in the
Company's Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") and have
all or part of their dividends reinvested in additional shares of Common Stock.
Participants in the Plan can also purchase additional shares of Common Stock
with cash (subject to certain limitations). The terms of the Plan are described
in a separate prospectus which may be obtained by calling the Plan
administrator, Mellon Bank, N.A., at (888) 261-6776.
Subject to the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation regarding owning
shares in excess of the Ownership Limitation, each outstanding share of Common
Stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of
shareholders, including the election of directors, and, except as otherwise
required by law or except as provided with respect to any other class or series
of shares of stock, the holders of such shares of Common Stock will possess the
exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the election of
directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock can elect all of the directors then standing for election and
the holders of the remaining shares, if any, will not be able to elect any
directors.
Holders of Common Stock have no conversion, sinking fund, redemption rights
or any preemptive rights to subscribe for any securities of the Company, nor do
they have any preference, appraisal or exchange rights.
12
<PAGE> 14
PREFERRED STOCK
Subject to limitations prescribed by Maryland law and the Company's
Articles of Incorporation, the Board of Directors is authorized to issue, from
the 10,000,000 authorized but unissued shares of capital stock of the Company,
Preferred Stock in such classes or series as the Board of Directors may
determine and to establish from time to time the number of shares of Preferred
Stock to be included in any such class or series and to fix the designation and
any preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends, qualifications and terms and conditions of
redemption of the shares of any such class or series, and such other subjects or
matters as may be fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors. As of the date
of this Prospectus, no shares of Preferred Stock are outstanding; however, it is
anticipated that an aggregate of 250,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock will
be issued in connection with the Kahler Acquisition. The issuance of Preferred
Stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control of the Company or other transaction in which holders of shares of Common
Stock might receive a premium for such shares over the market price.
7.9% Class A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
In connection with the Kahler Acquisition the Company will issue 250,000
shares of its newly designated 7.9% Class A Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock (the "Class A Shares"). The holders of the Class A Shares are entitled to
one vote for each share of Common Stock into which such holder's Class A Shares
could then be converted, and with respect to such vote, such holder shall have
full voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the
holders of Common Stock. The holders of Class A Shares shall be entitled to
vote, together with holders of Common Stock as a single class. Subject to
preferences that may be applicable to any future class of Preferred Stock, the
holders of Class A Shares are entitled to receive, ratably, a dividend equal to
the greater of (i) 7.9% per share per annum or (ii) the percentage dividend that
would be paid on the Common Stock into which the Preferred Stock is convertible.
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, subject
to the rights of future classes of Preferred Stock, the holders of Class A
Shares are entitled to receive, prior and in preference to the holders of Common
Stock, an amount per share equal to $100.00 for each outstanding Class A Share,
plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Class A Shares have no preemptive rights.
Each Class A Share is convertible at the option of the holder at any time
into one share of Common Stock, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock
dividends, recapitalizations and the like. On or at any time after the fifth
anniversary of issuance of the Class A Shares, the Company may, at its option,
redeem the Class A Shares in whole or in part by paying an amount equal to the
redemption percentage of $100.00 per share then in effect (as adjusted for any
stock dividends, combinations or splits), plus all accrued but unpaid dividends
on such shares. The redemption percentage declines one percent per year, from
105% to par commencing in 2002. There are no sinking fund provisions applicable
to the Class A Shares. All outstanding Class A Shares will, upon issuance, be
fully paid and non-assessable.
Terms of Future Classes of Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock, upon issuance against full payment of the purchase price
therefor, will be fully paid and nonassessable. The specific terms of a
particular class or series of Preferred Stock to be offered hereby will be
described in the Prospectus Supplement relating to that class or series,
including a Prospectus Supplement providing that Preferred Stock may be issuable
upon the exercise of Warrants issued by the Company. In addition, the terms of
any class or series of Preferred Stock which may be issued will be set forth in
Articles Supplementary to the Company's Articles of Incorporation which will be
filed with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation and as an exhibit
to (or incorporated by reference in) the Registration Statement of which this
Prospectus is a part. The description of Preferred Stock set forth below and the
description of the terms of a particular class or series of Preferred Stock set
forth in a Prospectus Supplement do not purport to be complete and are qualified
in their entirety by reference to the articles supplementary relating to that
class or series.
13
<PAGE> 15
The preferences and other terms of the Preferred Stock of each class or
series will be fixed by the Articles Supplementary relating to such class or
series. A Prospectus Supplement, relating to each class or series, will specify
the terms of the Preferred Stock as follows:
(1) The title and stated value of such Preferred Stock;
(2) The number of shares of such Preferred Stock offered, the liquidation
preference per share and the offering price of such Preferred Stock;
(3) The dividend rate(s), period(s), and/or payment date(s) or method(s)
of calculation thereof applicable to such Preferred Stock;
(4) Whether dividends payable on such Preferred Stock is cumulative or not
and, if cumulative, the date from which dividends on such Preferred
Stock shall accumulate;
(5) The provision for a sinking fund, if any, for such Preferred Stock;
(6) The provision for redemption, if applicable, of such Preferred Stock;
(7) Any listing of such Preferred Stock on any securities exchange;
(8) The terms and conditions, if applicable, upon which such Preferred
Stock will be converted into Common Stock of the Company, including
the conversion price (or manner of calculation thereof);
(9) A discussion of any material United States federal income tax
considerations applicable to such Preferred Stock (in addition to
those discussed herein);
(10) Any limitations on direct or beneficial ownership and restrictions on
transfer, in each case as may be appropriate to preserve the status of
the Company as a REIT;
(11) The relative ranking and preferences of such Preferred Stock as to
dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of the affairs of the Company;
(12) Any limitations on issuance of any class or series of preferred stock
ranking senior to or on parity with such class or series of Preferred
Stock as to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the affairs of the Company;
(13) Any voting rights of such Preferred Stock; and
(14) Any other specific terms, preferences, rights, limitations or
restrictions of such Preferred Stock.
Registrar and Transfer Agent
The registrar and transfer agent for any class or series of the Preferred
Stock offered hereby will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.
CLASSIFICATION OR RECLASSIFICATION OF COMMON STOCK OR PREFERRED STOCK
Subject to limitations prescribed by Maryland law and the Company's
Articles of Incorporation, the Board of Directors is authorized to classify and
reclassify any unissued portion of the authorized shares of capital stock to
provide for the issuance of shares in other classes or series, including other
classes or series of Common Stock or Preferred Stock, to establish the number of
shares in each class or series and to fix the designation and any preferences,
conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of such class
or series. The rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such class or
series will be fixed by Articles Supplementary to the Company's Articles of
Incorporation relating to such class or series. A Prospectus Supplement will
specify the terms of any such class or series offered hereby.
14
<PAGE> 16
RESTRICTIONS ON OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK OR PREFERRED STOCK
The following is a description of the restrictions on ownership of the
Common Stock and Preferred Stock. There may be additional provisions that
further restrict ownership and transfer, which will be described in any
applicable Prospectus Supplement. Such description is, and will be, qualified in
its entirety by any supplements to the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws filed
as exhibits to, or incorporated by reference in, the Registration Statement of
which this Prospectus is a part.
For the Company to qualify as a REIT under the Code, it must meet certain
requirements concerning the ownership of its outstanding shares of capital
stock. Specifically, not more than 50% in value of the Company's outstanding
shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as
defined in the Code to include certain entities) during the last half of a
taxable year, and the Company must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons
during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a
proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. See "United States Federal Income
Tax Considerations -- Requirements for Qualification." In addition, the Company
must meet certain requirements regarding the nature of its gross income in order
to qualify as a REIT. One such requirement is that at least 75% of the Company's
gross income for each year must consist of rents from real property and income
from certain other real property investments. The rents received by the
Partnership from the Lessee would not qualify as rents from real property, which
would result in loss of REIT status for the Company, if the Company were at any
time to own, directly or constructively, 10% or more of the ownership interests
in the Lessee within the meaning of Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code. See
"United States Federal Income Tax Considerations -- Requirements for
Qualification -- Income Tests."
Because the Board of Directors believes it is essential for the Company to
qualify as a REIT, the Articles of Incorporation, subject to certain exceptions
described below, provides that no person may own, or be deemed to own by virtue
of the constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% of the
lesser in value of the total number or value of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock or the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock (the "Ownership Limitation").
The constructive ownership rules of the Code are complex and may cause shares
owned actually or constructively by two or more related individuals and/or
entities to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a result,
the acquisition of less than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock or
9.8% of the shares of Preferred Stock (or the acquisition of an interest in an
entity which owns the shares) by an individual or entity could cause that
individual or entity (or another individual or entity) to own constructively in
excess of 9.8% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock or 9.8% of the
outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, and thus subject such shares to the
Ownership Limitation provisions of the Articles of Incorporation. The Ownership
Limitation also prohibits any transfer of Common Stock or Preferred Stock that
would (i) result in the Common Stock and Preferred Stock being owned by fewer
than 100 persons (determined without reference to any rules of attribution),
(ii) result in the Company being "closely held" within the meaning of Section
856(h) of the Code, or (iii) cause the Company to own, directly or
constructively, 10% or more of the ownership interests in a tenant of the
Company's real property, within the meaning of Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code.
Except as otherwise provided below, any such acquisition or transfer of the
Company's capital stock (including any constructive acquisition or transfer of
ownership) shall be null and void, and the intended transferee or owner will
acquire no rights to, or economic interests in, the shares.
Subject to certain exceptions described below, any purported transfer of
Common Stock or Preferred Stock that would (i) result in any person owning,
directly or indirectly, Common Stock or Preferred Stock in excess of the
Ownership Limitation, (ii) result in the Common Stock and Preferred Stock being
owned by fewer than 100 persons (determined without reference to any rules of
attribution), (iii) result in the Company being "closely held" within the
meaning of Section 856(h) the Code, or (iv) cause the Company to own, directly
or constructively, 10.0% or more of the ownership interests in a tenant of the
Company's or the Partnership's real property, within the meaning of Section
856(d)(2)(B) of the Code, will be designated as "Shares-in-Trust" and
transferred automatically to a trust (the "Share Trust") effective on the day
before the purported transfer of such Common Stock or Preferred Stock. The
record holder of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock that are designated as
Shares-in-Trust (the "Prohibited Owner") will be required to submit such number
of shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock to the Share Trust for designation
in the name of
15
<PAGE> 17
a trustee to be designated by the Company (the "Share Trustee"). The beneficiary
of the Share Trust (the "Beneficiary") will be one or more charitable
organizations that are named by the Company.
Shares-in-Trust will remain issued and outstanding Common Stock or
Preferred Stock and will be entitled to the same rights and privileges as all
other shares of the same class or series. The Share Trust will receive all
dividends and distributions on the Shares-in-Trust and will hold such dividends
or distributions in trust for the benefit of the Beneficiary. The Share Trustee
will vote all Shares-in-Trust. The Share Trustee will designate a permitted
transferee of the Shares-in-Trust, provided that the permitted transferee (i)
purchases such Shares-in-Trust for valuable consideration and (ii) acquires such
Shares-in-Trust without such acquisition resulting in a transfer to another
Share Trust.
The Prohibited Owner with respect to Shares-in-Trust will be required to
repay to the Share Trust the amount of any dividends or distributions received
by the Prohibited Owner (i) that are attributable to any Shares-in-Trust and
(ii) for which the record date was on or after the date that such shares became
Shares-in-Trust. The Prohibited Owner generally will receive from the Share
Trustee the lesser of (i) the price per share such Prohibited Owner paid for the
Common Stock or Preferred Stock that were designated as Shares-in-Trust (or, in
the case of a gift or devise, the market price (based on a five day trading
average) per share on the date of such transfer) and (ii) the price per share
received by the Share Trustee from the sale or other disposition of such
Shares-in-Trust. Any amounts received by the Share Trustee in excess of the
amounts to be paid to the Prohibited Owner will be distributed to the
Beneficiary.
The Shares-in-Trust will be deemed to have been offered for sale to the
Company, or its designee, at a price per share equal to the lesser of (i) the
price per share in the transaction that created such Shares-in-Trust (or, in the
case of a gift or devise, the market price per share on the date of such
transfer) or (ii) the market price per share on the date that the Company, or
its designee, accepts such offer. The Company will have the right to accept such
offer for a period of ninety days after the later of (i) the date of the
purported transfer which resulted in such Shares-in-Trust and (ii) the date the
Company determines in good faith that a transfer resulting in such
Shares-in-Trust occurred.
Any person who acquires or attempts to acquire Common Stock or Preferred
Stock in violation of the foregoing restrictions, or any person who owned shares
of Common Stock or Preferred Stock that were transferred to a Share Trust, will
be required (i) to give immediately written notice to the Company of such event
and (ii) to provide to the Company such other information as the Company may
request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such transfer on the
Company's status as a REIT.
All persons who own, directly or indirectly, more than 5% (or such lower
percentages as required pursuant to regulations under the Code) of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock must within 30 days after
January 1 of each year, provide to the Company a written statement or affidavit
stating the name and address of such direct or indirect owner, the number of
shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock owned directly or indirectly, and a
description of how such shares are held. In addition, each direct or indirect
shareholder shall provide to the Company such additional information as the
Company may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such ownership
on the Company's status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with the Ownership
Limitation.
The Ownership Limitation generally will not apply to the acquisition of
shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock by an underwriter that participates in
a public offering of such shares. In addition, the Board of Directors, upon
receipt of a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion of counsel
and upon such other conditions as the Board of Directors may direct, may exempt
a person from the Ownership Limitation under certain circumstances. The
foregoing restrictions will continue to apply until the Board of Directors, with
the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of
all votes entitled to vote on such matter at a regular or special meeting of the
shareholders of the Company, determines to terminate its status as a REIT.
The Ownership Limitation will not be automatically removed even if the REIT
provisions of the Code are changed so as to remove any ownership concentration
limitation. Any change of the Ownership Limitation would require an amendment to
the Articles of Incorporation. Such amendment requires the affirmative vote
16
<PAGE> 18
of holders holding at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote on the matter. In addition to preserving the Company's status as a REIT,
the Ownership Limitation may have the effect of delaying, deferring,
discouraging or preventing a transaction or a change in control of the Company
without the approval of the Board of Directors.
Any certificates representing shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock
will bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above.
DESCRIPTION OF WARRANTS
The Company has no Warrants outstanding. The Company may issue Warrants for
the purchase of Preferred Stock or Common Stock. Warrants may be issued
independently or together with any other Offered Securities offered by any
Prospectus Supplement and may be attached to or separate from such Offered
Securities. Each series of Warrants will be issued under a separate warrant
agreement (each, a "Warrant Agreement") to be entered into between the Company
and a warrant agent specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement (the
"Warrant Agent"). The Warrant Agent will act solely as an agent of the Company
in connection with the Warrants of such series and will not assume any
obligation or relationship of agency or trust for or with any provisions of the
Warrants offered hereby. Further terms of the Warrants and the applicable
Warrant Agreements will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.
The applicable Prospectus Supplement will describe the terms of the
Warrants in respect of which this Prospectus is being delivered, including,
where applicable, the following:
(1) The title of such Warrants;
(2) The aggregate number of such Warrants;
(3) The price or prices at which such Warrants will be issued;
(4) The designation, terms and number of shares of Preferred Stock or
Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of such Warrants;
(5) The designation and terms of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock, if
any, with which such Warrants are issued and the number of such
Warrants issued with the Common Stock or Preferred Stock;
(6) The date, if any, on and after which such Warrants and the related
Preferred Stock or Common Stock will be separately transferable;
(7) The price at which each share of Preferred Stock or Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of such Warrants may be purchased;
(8) The date on which the right to exercise such Warrants shall commence
and the date on which such right shall expire;
(9) The minimum or maximum amount of such Warrants which may be exercised
at any one time;
(10) Information with respect to book-entry procedures, if any;
(11) A discussion of certain Federal income tax considerations specifically
related to such Warrants; and
(12) Any other terms of such Warrants, including terms, procedures and
limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such Warrants.
17
<PAGE> 19
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW AND
OF THE COMPANY'S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
The following summary of certain provisions of Maryland law and of the
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company does not purport to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Maryland law and the
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company (and any amendments and
supplements thereto) which are filed as exhibits to, or incorporated by
reference in, the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part.
ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECT OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW AND OF THE COMPANY'S
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
The provisions in the Articles of Incorporation regarding the Ownership
Limitation and the classification of the Board of Directors, the business
combination provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law ("MGCL"), the
control shares acquisition provisions of the MGCL, and the advance notice
provisions of the Bylaws could have the effect of delaying, deferring,
discouraging or preventing a transaction or a change in control of the Company
in which holders of some, or a majority, of the capital stock of the Company
might receive a premium for their shares over the then prevailing market price
or which such holders might believe to be otherwise in their best interest.
Certain significant provisions which might have this effect are described below.
CLASSIFICATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Bylaws provide that the number of directors of the Company may be
established by the Board of Directors but may not be fewer than three nor more
than nine. The directors may increase the number of directors by a vote of a
least 80% of the members of the Board of Directors, provided that the number of
directors shall never be less than the number required by Maryland law and that
the tenure of office of a director shall not be affected by any decrease in the
number of directors. Any vacancy will be filled, including a vacancy created by
an increase in the number of directors, at any regular meeting or at any special
meeting called for that purpose, by a majority of the remaining directors,
except that a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors must
be filled by a majority of the entire Board of Directors.
Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation the Board of Directors will be
divided into three classes of directors. As the term of each class expires,
directors in that class will be elected by the shareholders of the Company for a
term of three years and until their successors are duly elected and qualify.
Classification of the Board of Directors is intended to assure the continuity
and stability of the Company's business strategies and policies as determined by
the Board of Directors. Shareholders will have no right to cumulative voting in
the election of directors. Consequently, at each annual meeting of shareholders,
the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by
proxy at such meeting will be able to elect all of the successors of the class
of directors whose terms expire at that meeting.
The classified board provision could have the effect of making the
replacement of incumbent directors more time consuming and difficult, which
could delay, defer, discourage or prevent an attempt by a third party to obtain
control of the Company or other transaction, even though such an attempt or
other transaction might be beneficial to the Company and its shareholders. At
least two annual meetings of shareholders, instead of one, will generally be
required to effect a change in a majority of the Board of Directors. Thus, the
classified board provision could increase the likelihood that incumbent
directors will retain their positions.
REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS
The Articles of Incorporation provide that a director may be removed with
or without cause by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast in the election of directors. This provision when coupled
with the provision in the Bylaws authorizing the Board of Directors to fill
vacant directorships, could preclude shareholders from removing incumbent
directors except upon the existence of a substantial affirmative vote and by
filling the vacancies created by such removal with their own nominees upon the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast in the election
of directors.
18
<PAGE> 20
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws limit the liability of the
Company's directors and officers for money damages to the Company and its
shareholders to the fullest extent permitted from time to time by Maryland law.
Maryland law presently permits the liability of directors and officers to a
corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages to be limited, except (i)
to the extent that it is proved that the director or officer actually received
an improper benefit or profit, or (ii) to the extent that a judgment or other
final adjudication is entered in a proceeding based on a finding that the
director's or officer's action, or failure to act, was the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty and was material to the cause of action, as adjudicated in
the proceeding. This provision does not limit the ability of the Company or its
shareholders to obtain other relief, such as an injunction or rescission.
The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws require the Company to indemnify
its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted from time to time by
Maryland law. The Company's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws also permit the
Company to indemnify employees, agents and other persons acting on behalf of or
at the request of the Company. The MGCL generally permits a corporation to
indemnify its directors, officers and certain other parties against judgments,
penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them
in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made a party by reason of
their service to or at the request of the Company. Indemnification under the
provisions of the MGCL is not deemed exclusive to any other rights, by
indemnification or otherwise, to which an officer or director may be entitled
under the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, or under resolutions of
shareholders or directors, contract or otherwise. It is the position of the
Commission that indemnification of directors and officers for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act is against public policy and is unenforceable
pursuant to Section 14 of the Securities Act.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Under the MGCL, certain "business combinations" (including a merger,
consolidation, share exchange or, in certain circumstances, an asset transfer or
issuance or reclassification of equity securities) between a Maryland
corporation and any person who beneficially owns ten percent or more of the
voting power of such corporation's shares or an affiliate of such corporation
who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was
the beneficial owner of ten percent or more of the voting power of the
then-outstanding voting shares of such corporation (an "Interested Shareholder")
or an affiliate thereof are prohibited for five years after the most recent date
on which the Interested Shareholder became an Interested Shareholder.
Thereafter, any such business combination must be recommended by the board of
directors of such corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least
(a) 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding voting shares
of such corporation and (b) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by
holders of voting shares of such corporation other than shares held by the
Interested Shareholder with whom (or with whose affiliate) the business
combination is to be effected, unless, among other things, such corporation's
shareholders receive a minimum price (as defined in the MGCL) for their shares
and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid
by the Interested Shareholder for its shares. These provisions of Maryland law
do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by
the board of directors of a corporation prior to the time that the Interested
Shareholder becomes an Interested Shareholder. The Board of Directors has
exempted from these provisions of the MGCL any business combination with certain
officers and directors of the Company, and all present or future affiliates or
associates of, or any other person acting in concert or as a group with, any of
the foregoing persons and any other business combination which may arise in
connection with the Company formation transactions generally.
CONTROL SHARE ACQUISITIONS
The MGCL provides that "control shares" of a Maryland corporation acquired
in a "control share acquisition" have no voting rights except to the extent
approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter,
excluding shares owned by the acquiror, by officers or by directors who are
employees of a corporation. "Control Shares" are voting shares which, if
aggregated with all other such shares previously acquired by the acquiror, or in
respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of
voting
19
<PAGE> 21
power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror
to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following
ranges of voting power: (i) one-fifth or more but less than one-third (ii)
one-third or more but less than a majority, or (iii) a majority or more of all
voting power. Control Shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then
entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained shareholder approval.
A "control share acquisition" means the acquisition of control shares, subject
to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition, upon
satisfaction of certain conditions (including an undertaking to pay expenses),
may compel the board of directors of a corporation to call a special meeting of
shareholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights
of the shares. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself
present the question at any shareholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person
does not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the statute, then,
subject to certain conditions and limitations, a corporation may redeem any or
all of the control shares (except those for which voting rights have previously
been approved) for fair value determined, without regard to the absence of
voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share
acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of shareholders at which the
voting rights of such shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights
for control shares are approved at a shareholders meeting and the acquiror
becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other
shareholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as
determined for purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the
highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition,
and certain limitations and restrictions otherwise applicable to the exercise of
dissenters' rights do not apply in the context of a control share acquisition.
The control share acquisition statute does not apply to shares acquired in
a merger, consolidation or share exchange, if the corporation is a party to the
transaction, or to acquisitions approved or exempted by the articles of
incorporation or bylaws of a corporation.
The Bylaws of the Company contain a provision exempting from the control
share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of the
Company's Common Stock or Preferred Stock. There can be no assurance that such
provision will not be amended or eliminated in the future.
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
The Articles of Incorporation may only be amended by the affirmative vote
of the holders of not less than a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on
the matter, except that any proposal (i) to permit cumulative voting in the
election of directors, (ii) to alter provisions of the Articles of Incorporation
requiring a majority of the directors to be independent directors or provisions
of the Articles of Incorporation relative to the classification of the Company's
Board of Directors into three classes, removal of directors, preemptive rights,
indemnification of corporate agents and limitation of liability of officers and
directors, or (iii) that would terminate the Company's status as a REIT for tax
purposes, may not be amended, altered, changed or repealed without the
affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be cast
on the matter. Subject to the right of the Company's shareholders to adopt,
alter or repeal the Bylaws, the Bylaws may be amended by the Board of Directors,
except for provisions of the Bylaws relating to the sale of certain hotels and
transactions involving the Company in which an advisor, director or officer has
an interest, which may be altered or repealed only upon the vote of shareholders
holding at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors.
DISSOLUTION OF THE COMPANY
Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, the dissolution of the Company
must be approved and advised by the Board of Directors and approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all of the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter.
20
<PAGE> 22
OPERATIONS
The Company is generally prohibited from engaging in certain activities,
including incurring consolidated indebtedness, in the aggregate, in excess of
50% of the Company's investment in hotels at cost, and acquiring or holding
property or engaging in any activity that would cause the Company to fail to
qualify as a REIT.
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of material federal income tax considerations
that may be relevant to a prospective holder of the Common Stock or Preferred
Stock. The discussion contained herein does not address all aspects of taxation
that may be relevant to particular holders of the Common Stock or Preferred
Stock in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances, or to certain
types of holders (including insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations,
financial institutions or broker-dealers, foreign corporations, and persons who
are not citizens or residents of the United States) subject to special treatment
under the federal income tax laws.
The statements in this discussion as to tax consequences expressed herein
are based on current provisions of the Code, existing, temporary, and currently
proposed Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code, the legislative
history of the Code, existing administrative rulings and practices of the
Service, and judicial decisions. No assurance can be given that future
legislative, judicial, or administrative actions or decisions, which may be
retroactive in effect, will not affect the accuracy of any statements in this
Prospectus with respect to the transactions entered into or contemplated prior
to the effective date of such changes.
EACH PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS ADVISED TO CONSULT HIS OWN TAX ADVISOR
REGARDING THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO HIM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP, AND
SALE OF THE COMMON STOCK OR PREFERRED STOCK AND OF THE COMPANY'S ELECTION TO BE
TAXED AS A REIT, INCLUDING THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN, AND OTHER TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP, SALE, AND ELECTION, AND OF POTENTIAL
CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS.
TAXATION OF THE COMPANY
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through
860 of the Code, effective for its taxable year ended on December 31, 1995. The
Company has previously received an opinion of its counsel, Brobeck, Phleger &
Harrison LLP, that, commencing with the inception of the Company's taxable year
ended December 31, 1995, the Company has been organized and operated in
conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code, and
that its organization and contemplated method of operation will enable it to
continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under
the Code for its subsequent taxable years. In addition to the opinion previously
rendered, counsel or independent public accountants to the Company may in
connection with a particular offering of the Offered Securities render an
opinion that as of the time of such offering the Company continues to qualify as
a REIT under the Code. Investors should be aware, however, that such opinions
are not binding upon the Service or any court. It must be emphasized that
counsel's prior opinion was, and any subsequent opinion of counsel or the
Company's independent public accountants will be, based on various assumptions
and was and will be conditioned upon the accuracy of certain representations
made by the Company as to factual matters, including representations regarding
the nature of the Company's properties and income during 1995 and subsequently
and the future conduct of its business. Moreover, qualification and taxation as
a REIT depends upon the Company's ability to meet on a continuing basis, through
actual annual operating results, distribution levels, and share ownership, the
various qualification tests imposed under the Code discussed below. Counsel will
not review the Company's compliance with those tests on a continuing basis.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of the Company's
operation for 1996, 1997 and subsequent taxable years will satisfy all of the
requirements for qualification as a REIT.
The sections of the Code relating to qualification and operation as a REIT
are highly technical and complex. The following discussion sets forth the
material aspects of the Code sections that govern the federal
21
<PAGE> 23
income tax treatment of a REIT and its shareholders. The discussion is qualified
in its entirety by the applicable Code provisions, Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof,
all of which are subject to change prospectively or retrospectively.
Assuming the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it generally will
not be subject to federal corporate income tax on its net income that is
distributed currently to its shareholders. That treatment substantially
eliminates the "double taxation" (i.e., taxation at both the corporate and
shareholder levels) that generally results from investment in a corporation.
However, the Company will be subject to federal income tax in the following
circumstances. First, the Company will be taxed at regular corporate rates on
any undistributed REIT taxable income, including undistributed net capital
gains. Furthermore, under certain circumstances, the Company may be subject to
the "alternative minimum tax" on its items of tax preference. Third, if the
Company has (i) net income from the sale or other disposition of "foreclosure
property" that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business or (ii) other nonqualifying income from foreclosure property, it will
be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate on such income. Fourth, if the
Company has net income from prohibited transactions (which are, in general,
certain sales or other dispositions of property (other than foreclosure
property) held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business), such income will be subject to a 100% tax. Fifth, if the Company
should fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test
(as discussed below), and has nonetheless maintained its qualification as a REIT
because certain other requirements have been met, it will be subject to a 100%
tax on the net income attributable to the greater of the amount by which the
Company fails the 75% or 95% gross income test. Sixth, if the Company should
fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of its
REIT ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income
for such year, and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods,
the Company would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required
distribution over the amounts actually distributed. Seventh, if the Company
acquires any asset from a C corporation (i.e., a corporation generally subject
to full corporate-level tax) in a transaction in which the basis of the asset in
the Company's hands is determined by reference to the basis of the asset (or any
other asset) in the hands of the C corporation and the Company recognizes gain
on the disposition of such asset during the 10-year period beginning on the date
on which such asset was acquired by the Company, then the Company would be
taxable to the extent of such asset's "built-in-gain."
REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFICATION
The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association (i) that is
managed by one or more trustees or directors; (ii) the beneficial ownership of
which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of
beneficial interest; (iii) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but
for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code; (iv) that is neither a financial
institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code;
(v) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons; (vi) not
more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares of which is owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include
certain entities) during the last half of each taxable year (the "5/50 Rule");
(vii) that makes an election to be a REIT (or has made such election for a
previous taxable year) and satisfies all relevant filing and other
administrative requirements established by the Service that must be met in order
to elect and to maintain REIT status; (viii) that uses a calendar year for
federal income tax purposes and complies with the recordkeeping requirements of
the Code and Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder; and (ix) that meets
certain other tests, described below, regarding the nature of its income and
assets. The Company's Articles of Incorporation provide for restrictions
regarding transfer of the Company's stock that are intended to assist the
Company in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in
(v) and (vi) above. See "Description of Common Stock and Preferred Stock --
Restrictions on Ownership of Common Stock or Preferred Stock."
In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, Treasury
Regulations provide that the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share
of the assets of the partnership and will be deemed to be entitled to the gross
income of the partnership attributable to such share. In addition, the assets
and gross income of the partnership will retain the same character in the hands
of the REIT as in the partnership for purposes of Section 856 of the Code,
including satisfying the gross income and asset tests, described below. Thus,
22
<PAGE> 24
assuming the Partnership is classified as a partnership rather than as a
corporation for tax purposes, the Company's proportionate share of the assets,
liabilities and items of income of the Partnership will be treated as assets and
gross income of the Company for purposes of applying the requirements described
herein.
Income Tests
In order for the Company to maintain its qualification as a REIT, there are
three requirements relating to the Company's gross income that must be satisfied
annually. First, at least 75% of the Company's gross income (excluding gross
income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must consist of
defined types of income derived directly or indirectly from investments relating
to real property or mortgages on real property (including "rents from real
property" and, in certain circumstances, interest) or temporary investment
income. Second, at least 95% of the Company's gross income (excluding gross
income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must be derived from
such real property or temporary investments, and from dividends, other types of
interest, and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, or from
any combination of the foregoing. Third, not more that 30% of the Company's
gross income (including gross income from prohibited transactions) for each
taxable year may be gain from the sale or other disposition of (i) stock or
securities held for less than one year, (ii) dealer property that is not
foreclosure property, and (iii) certain real property held for less than four
years (apart from involuntary conversions and sales of foreclosure property).
The specific application of these tests to the Company is discussed below.
Rents received by the Company will qualify as "rents from real property" in
satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if
several conditions are met. First, the amount of rent must not be based in whole
or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount received
or accrued generally will not be excluded from the term "rents from real
property" solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages
of receipts or sales. Second, rents received from a tenant will not qualify as
"rents from real property" in satisfying the gross income tests if the Company,
or an owner of 10% or more of the Company, directly or constructively owns 10%
or more of such tenant (a "Related Party Tenant"). Third, if rent attributable
to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property is
greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of
rent attributable to such personal property will not qualify as "rents from real
property." Finally, for rents received to qualify as "rents from real property,"
the Company generally must not operate or manage the property or furnish or
render services to the tenants of such property, other than through an
"independent contractor" who is adequately compensated and from whom the Company
derives no revenue. The "independent contractor" requirement, however, does not
apply to the extent the services provided by the Company are "usually or
customarily rendered" in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only
and are not otherwise considered "rendered to the occupant."
Pursuant to percentage leases (the "Percentage Leases"), Sunstone Hotel
Properties, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Lessee") has leased from the
Partnership the land, buildings, improvements, furnishings and equipment
comprising the hotels for a 10-year period. The Percentage Leases provide that
the Lessee is obligated to pay to the Partnership (i) the greater of base rent
("Base Rent") or percentage rent ("Percentage Rent," and with Base Rent,
collectively, the "Rents") and (ii) certain other additional charges (the
"Additional Charges"). The Percentage Rent is calculated by multiplying fixed
percentages by the room revenues for each of the hotels in excess of certain
levels. Both the Base Rent and the threshold room revenue amount in each
Percentage Rent formula will be adjusted for inflation. The adjustment will be
calculated at the beginning of each calendar year based on the change in the CPI
during the prior calendar year. The Base Rent accrues and is required to be paid
monthly and the Percentage Rent (if any) accrues and is required to be paid
quarterly. In order for the Base Rent, the Percentage Rent and the Additional
Charges to constitute "rents from real property," the Percentage Leases must be
respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes and not treated as
service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement.
Either legal counsel or the independent public accountants of the Company
will render the opinion that the Percentage Leases will be treated as true
leases for federal income tax purposes. Such opinion is based, in part, on the
following facts, as well as representations of the Company described below: (i)
the Partnership and the Lessee intend for their relationship to be that of a
lessor and lessee and such relationship will be documented by lease agreements,
(ii) the Lessee will have the right to exclusive possession and use and quiet
23
<PAGE> 25
enjoyment of the hotels during the term of the Percentage Leases, (iii) the
Lessee will bear the cost of, and be responsible for, day-to-day maintenance and
repair of the hotels, other than the cost of certain capital expenditures and
will dictate how the hotels are operated, maintained and improved, (iv) the
Lessee will bear all of the costs and expenses of operating the hotels
(including the cost of any inventory used in their operation) during the term of
the Percentage Leases (other than real and personal property taxes, insurance
(other than workers' compensation insurance) and the cost of repairing,
replacing or refurbishing furniture, fixtures and equipment, to the extent such
costs do not exceed the amounts to be made available to the Lessee for such
costs by the Partnership under each Percentage Lease), (v) the Lessee will
benefit from any savings in the costs of operating the hotels during the term of
the Percentage Leases, (vi) in the event of damage or destruction to a hotel,
the Lessee will be at economic risk because it will be obligated either (A) to
restore the property to its prior condition, in which event it will bear all
costs of such restoration in excess of any insurance proceeds or (B) to purchase
the hotel for an amount generally equal to the fair market value of the
Property, less any insurance proceeds, (vii) the Lessee will indemnify the
Partnership against all liabilities imposed on the Partnership during the term
of the Percentage Leases by reason of (A) injury to persons or damage to
property occurring at the hotels or (B) the Lessee's use, management,
maintenance or repair of the hotels, and (viii) the Lessee will be obligated to
pay substantial fixed rent for the period of use of the hotels, and (ix) the
Lessee stands to incur substantial losses (or reap substantial gains) depending
on how successfully it operates the hotels.
Investors should be aware that there are no controlling Treasury
Regulations, published rulings, or judicial decisions involving leases with
terms substantially the same as the Percentage Leases that discuss whether such
leases constitute true leases for federal income tax purposes. Counsel's opinion
regarding the Percentage Leases is not binding on the Service or the courts.
Thus, there can be no assurance that the Service will not assert successfully a
contrary position. If the Percentage Leases are recharacterized as service
contracts or partnership agreements, rather than true leases, part or all of the
payments that the Partnership receives from the Lessee would not be considered
rent or would not otherwise satisfy the various requirements for qualification
as "rents from real property." In that case, the Company would not be able to
satisfy either the 75% or 95% gross income tests and, as a result, would lose
its REIT status.
As stated above, in order for the Rents to constitute "rents from real
property," the Rents attributable to personal property leased in connection with
the lease of the real properties comprising a hotel must not be greater than 15%
of the Rents received under the Percentage Lease. The portion of the Rents
attributable to the personal property in a hotel is the amount that bears the
same ratio to total Rent for the taxable year as the average of the adjusted
bases of the personal property in the hotel at the beginning and at the end of
the taxable year bears to the average of the aggregate adjusted bases of both
the real and personal property comprising the hotel at the beginning and at the
end of such taxable year (the "Adjusted Basis Ratio"). With respect to each
hotel, the Company has determined that the adjusted tax bases of the personal
property in such hotel has, at all times while the Partnership has owned such
hotel, been less than 15% of the adjusted tax bases of both the real and
personal property comprising such hotel. The Partnership has represented that in
no event will it acquire additional personal property for any hotel to the
extent that such acquisition would cause the adjusted tax bases of such personal
property to exceed 15% of the total adjusted tax bases of the real and personal
property comprising such hotel. There can be no firm assurance, however, that
the Company will not fail the 15% adjusted basis ratio test described above as
to one or more of the Percentage Leases, which in turn potentially could cause
it to fail to satisfy the 95% or 75% gross income test and thus lose its REIT
status.
Another requirement for qualification of the Rents as "rents from real
property" is that the Percentage Rent must not be based in whole or in part on
the income or profits of any person. The Percentage Rent, however, will qualify
as "rents from real property" if it is based on percentages of receipts or sales
and the percentages (i) are fixed at the time the Percentage Leases are entered
into, (ii) are not renegotiated during the term of the Percentage Leases in a
manner that has the effect of basing Percentage Rent on income or profits, and
(iii) conform with normal business practice. More generally, the Percentage Rent
will not qualify as "rents from real property" if, considering the Percentage
Leases and all the surrounding circumstances, the arrangement does not conform
with normal business practice, but is in reality used as a means of basing the
Percentage Rent on income or profits. Since the Percentage Rent is based on
fixed percentages of the gross
24
<PAGE> 26
revenues from the hotels that are established in the Percentage Leases, and the
Company has represented that the percentages (i) will not be renegotiated during
the terms of the Percentage Leases in a manner that has the effect of basing the
Percentage Rent on income or profits and (ii) conform with normal business
practice, the Percentage Rent should not be considered based in whole or in part
on the income or profits of any person. Furthermore, the Company has represented
that, with respect to other hotels that it acquires in the future, it will not
charge rent for any property that is based in whole or in part on the income or
profits of any person (except by reason of being based on a fixed percentage of
gross revenues, as described above). In the event that any of the foregoing
representations of the Company are inaccurate, the Company could fail or cease
to qualify as a REIT.
A third requirement for qualification of the Rents as "rents from real
property" is that the Company must not own, directly or constructively, 10% or
more of the Lessee. The constructive ownership rules generally provide that, if
10% or more in value of the shares of the Company are owned, directly or
indirectly, by or for any person, the Company is considered as owning the shares
of the Lessee owned, directly or indirectly, by or for such person. The Company
has represented that it has not and will not at any time directly or indirectly
own any stock of the Lessee. However, because Robert A. Alter is currently the
sole shareholder of the Lessee, the Company would be deemed to own all of the
stock of the Lessee if Mr. Alter at any time owns, directly, indirectly or
constructively, 10% or more of the shares of Common Stock. The Partnership
Agreement provides that a redeeming Limited Partner will receive cash, rather
than shares of Common Stock, at the election of the Company or if the
acquisition of shares of Common Stock by such partner would result in such
partner or any other person owning, directly or constructively, more than 9.8%
of the Company for purposes of the Related Party Tenant rule. Thus, Mr. Alter
will never be entitled to acquire a 10% interest in the Company, and the Company
should never own, directly or constructively, 10% of more of the Lessee.
Furthermore, the Company has represented that, with respect to other hotels that
it acquires in the future, it will not rent any property to a Related Party
Tenant.
A fourth requirement for qualification of the Rents as "rents from real
property" is that the Company cannot furnish or render noncustomary services to
the Lessee (or tenants of the hotels), or manage or operate the hotels or any
leased properties, other than through an independent contractor who is
adequately compensated and from whom the Company itself does not derive or
receive any income. Provided that the Percentage Leases are respected as true
leases, the Company should satisfy that requirement because neither the Company
nor the Partnership will be performing any services other than customary ones
for the Lessee. The Company has also represented that, with respect to other
hotels that it acquires in the future, it will not perform noncustomary services
with respect to the tenant of the property and will not be managing or operating
the hotels or such other hotels. As described above, if the Percentage Leases
are recharacterized as service contracts or partnership agreements, the Rents
likely would be disqualified as "rents from real property" because the Company
would be considered to furnish or render nonqualifying services to the occupants
of the hotels and to manage or operate the hotels other than through an
independent contractor who is adequately compensated and from whom the Company
derives or receives no income.
If the Rents do not qualify as "rents from real property" because the rents
attributable to personal property exceed 15% of the total Rents for a taxable
year, the portion of the Rents that is attributable to personal property will
not be qualifying income for purposes of either the 75% or 95% gross income
tests. The Company would lose its REIT status in this event only if the Rents
attributable to personal property (plus any other nonqualifying income) during a
taxable year exceed 5% of the Company's gross income during the year. If,
however, the Rents do not qualify as "rents from real property" because either
(i) the Percentage Rent is considered based on income or profits of the Lessee,
(ii) the Company owns, directly or constructively, 10% or more of the Lessee, or
(iii) the Company furnishes noncustomary services to the tenants of the hotels,
or manages or operates the hotels, other than through a qualifying independent
contractor, none of the Rents would qualify as "rents from real property." In
that case, the Company would lose its REIT status because it would be unable to
satisfy either the 75% or 95% gross income tests.
In addition to the Rents, the Lessee is required to pay to the Partnership
the Additional Charges. To the extent that the Additional Charges represent
either (i) reimbursements of amounts paid by the Partnership to third parties
that the Lessee is obligated to bear or (ii) penalties for nonpayment or late
payment of such
25
<PAGE> 27
amounts, the Additional Charges should qualify as "rents from real property." To
the extent, however, that the Additional Charges represent interest that is
accrued on the late payment of the Rents or the Additional Charges, the
Additional Charges should not qualify as "rents from real property," but instead
should be treated as interest that qualifies for the 95% gross income test.
Any gross income derived from a prohibited transaction is taken into
account in applying the 30% income test necessary to qualify as a REIT (and the
net income from that transaction is subject to a 100% tax). The term "prohibited
transaction" generally includes a sale or other disposition of property (other
than foreclosure property) that is held primarily for sale to customers in the
ordinary course of a trade or business. The Company and the Partnership believe
that no asset owned by the Company or the Partnership will be held for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of business of the Company or the Partnership.
Whether property is held "primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course
of a trade or business" will depend, however, on the facts and circumstances
from time to time. The Company and the Partnership will attempt to comply with
the terms of safe-harbor provisions in the Code prescribing when asset sales
will not be characterized as prohibited transactions. Complete assurance cannot
be given, however, that the Company or the Partnership can comply with the
safe-harbor provisions of the Code or avoid owning property that may be
characterized as property held "primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of a trade or business."
If the Lessee defaults on its obligations under a Percentage Lease for a
hotel, the Company terminates the Lessee's leasehold interest, and the Company
is unable to find a qualifying replacement lessee for such hotel within 90 days
of such termination, gross income from hotel operations conducted by the Company
from such hotel would cease to qualify for the 75% and 95% gross income tests.
In such event, the Company likely would be unable to satisfy the 75% and 95%
gross income tests and, thus, would fail to qualify as a REIT.
If the Company fails to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income
tests for any taxable year, it may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for such year
if it is entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code. Those relief
provisions will be generally available if the Company's failure to meet such
tests is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, the Company
attaches a schedule of the sources of its income to its return, and any
incorrect information on the schedule was not due to fraud with intent to evade
tax. It is not possible, however, to state whether in all circumstances the
Company would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. As
discussed above in "-- Taxation of the Company," even if those relief provisions
apply, a 100% tax would be imposed with respect to the amount by which it fails
the 75% or 95% gross income tests. No such relief is available for violations of
the 30% income test.
Asset Tests
The Company, at the close of each quarter of its taxable year, also must
satisfy two tests relating to the nature of its assets. First, at least 75% of
the value of the Company's total assets must be represented by cash or cash
items (including certain receivables), government securities, "real estate
assets," or, in cases where the Company raises new capital through share or
long-term (at least five-year) debt offerings, temporary investments in stock or
debt instruments during the one-year period following the Company's receipt of
such capital. The term "real estate assets" includes interests in real property,
interests in mortgages on real property to the extent the mortgage balance does
not exceed the value of the associated real property, and shares of other REITs.
For purposes of the 75% asset test, the term "interest in real property"
includes an interest in land and improvements thereon, such as buildings or
other inherently permanent structures (including items that are structural
components of such buildings or structures), a leasehold in real property, and
an option to acquire real property (or a leasehold in real property). Second, of
the investments not included in the 75% asset class, the value of any one
issuer's securities owned by the Company may not exceed 5% of the value of the
Company's total assets and the Company may not own more than 10% of any one
issuer's outstanding voting securities (except for its ownership interest in the
stock of a qualified REIT subsidiary).
For purposes of the asset requirements, the Company will be deemed to own
its proportionate share of the assets of the Partnership, rather than its
partnership interest in the Partnership, assuming that the Partnership is
treated as a partnership and not as a corporation for tax purposes. The Company
has represented that at all times since the commencement of its taxable year
ended December 31, 1995, (i) at least 75% of the value of
26
<PAGE> 28
its total assets were represented by assets qualifying under the 75% asset test,
and (ii) it has not owned any securities that do not satisfy the 75% asset test.
The Company has represented that it has not and will not acquire or dispose, or
cause the Partnership to acquire or dispose, of assets during 1995, 1996, 1997
or in later years in a way that would cause it to violate the asset tests for
REIT status.
Distribution Requirements
The Company, in order to qualify as a REIT, is required to distribute
dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to its shareholders in an amount
at least equal to (i) the sum of (A) 95% of its "REIT taxable income"(computed
without regard to the dividends paid deduction and its net capital gain) and (B)
95% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (ii)
the sum of certain items of noncash income. Such distributions must be paid in
the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if
declared before the Company timely files its tax return for such year and if
paid on or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration. To
the extent that the Company does not distribute all of its net capital gain or
distributes at least 95%, but less than 100%, of its "REIT taxable income," as
adjusted, it will be subject to tax thereon at regular ordinary and capital
gains corporate tax rates. Furthermore, if the Company should fail to distribute
during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of its REIT ordinary
income for such year, (ii) 95% of its REIT capital gain income for such year,
and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, the Company would
be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of such required
distribution over the amounts actually distributed. For its taxable years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1996, the Company made distributions sufficient to satisfy
the foregoing distribution requirements. The Company intends in the future to
make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy all annual distribution
requirements. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will at all
times have sufficient available cash to satisfy such distribution requirements.
The Company, in order to retain its REIT qualification, may not have as of
the close of its taxable year earnings and profits accumulated from any non-REIT
year. Such determination includes the earnings and profits accumulated and not
distributed by companies which may be acquired by the Company. Under the Code,
in order to distribute all earnings and profits accumulated as of the end of a
prior taxable year, it is necessary to distribute all earnings and profits
accumulated in the current taxable year. The Kahler Acquisition will be
consummated in a fashion that the Company will succeed to any earnings and
profits of Kahler. Although calculations of earnings and profits and the timing
and characterizations of distributions are complex and it is possible for
divergences of opinion with respect to the amount of accumulated earnings and
profits, the Company believes that Kahler will have made such distributions
prior to its acquisition sufficient to eliminate any accumulated earnings and
profits. Should the Company determine that any earnings and profits of Kahler
have not been distributed prior to its acquisition, it will be necessary for the
Company to make a distribution before the close of its taxable year sufficient
to eliminate all current and accumulated earnings and profits.
Recordkeeping Requirement
Pursuant to applicable Treasury Regulations, in order to qualify as a REIT,
the Company must maintain certain records and request on an annual basis certain
information from its shareholders designed to disclose the actual ownership of
its outstanding shares. The Company has represented that it complied with these
requirements on a timely basis for its taxable years ended December 31, 1995 and
1996 and intends to comply with such requirements in the future. Counsel will
not monitor such compliance by the Company.
Anti-Abuse Regulations
The United States Treasury Department recently issued Treasury Regulations
that authorize the Service, in certain "abusive" transactions involving
partnerships, to disregard the form of the transaction and recast it for federal
tax purposes as the Service deems appropriate (the "Anti-Abuse Regulations").
The Anti-Abuse Regulations would apply where a partnership is formed or utilized
in connection with a transaction (or series of related transactions) with a
principal purpose of substantially reducing the present value of the partners'
aggregate federal tax liability in a manner inconsistent with the intent of the
partnership provisions of the
27
<PAGE> 29
Code. Counsel believes that the Anti-Abuse Regulations will not have any adverse
impact on the Company's ability to qualify as a REIT. However, because the
Anti-Abuse Regulations are extremely broad in scope and would be applied based
on an analysis of all of the facts and circumstances, counsel can give no
assurance that the Service will not successfully apply the Anti-Abuse
Regulations to the Company.
FAILURE TO QUALIFY
If the Company fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year,
and the relief provisions do not apply, the Company will be subject to tax
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at
regular corporate rates. Distributions to the shareholders in any year in which
the Company fails to qualify will not be deductible by the Company nor will they
be required to be made. In such event, to the extent of current and accumulated
earnings and profits, all distributions to shareholders will be taxable as
ordinary income and, subject to certain limitations of the Code, corporate
distributees may be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Unless
entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, the Company also will be
disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the
year during which the Company ceased to qualify as a REIT. It is not possible to
state whether in all circumstances the Company would be entitled to such
statutory relief.
TAXATION OF TAXABLE SHAREHOLDERS
As long as the Company qualifies as a REIT, distributions made to the
Company's taxable shareholders out of current or accumulated earnings and
profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends) will be taken into
account by such shareholders as ordinary income and will not be eligible for the
dividends received deduction generally available to corporations. Distributions
that are designated as capital gain dividends will be taxed as long-term capital
gains (to the extent they do not exceed the Company's actual net capital gain
for the taxable year) without regard to the period for which the shareholder has
held his shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock. However, corporate
shareholders may be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain
dividends as ordinary income. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated
earnings and profits will not be taxable to a shareholder to the extent that
they do not exceed the adjusted basis of the shareholder's Common Stock or
Preferred Stock, but rather will reduce the adjusted basis of such shares. To
the extent that distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and
profits exceed the adjusted basis of a shareholder's Common Stock or Preferred
Stock, such distributions will be included in income as long-term capital gain
(or short-term capital gain if the shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock
have been held for one year or less) assuming the shares of Common Stock or
Preferred Stock are capital assets in the hands of the shareholder. In addition,
any distribution declared by the Company in October, November, or December of
any year and payable to a shareholder of record on a specified date in any such
month shall be treated as both paid by the Company and received by the
shareholder on December 31 of such year, provided that the distribution is
actually paid by the Company during January of the following calendar year.
Shareholders may not include in their individual income tax returns any net
operating losses or capital losses of the Company. Instead, such losses would be
carried over by the Company for potential offset against its future income
(subject to certain limitations). Taxable distributions from the Company and
gain from the disposition of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock will not be
treated as passive activity income and, therefore, shareholders generally will
not be able to apply any "passive activity losses" (such as losses from certain
types of limited partnerships in which the shareholder is a limited partner)
against such income. In addition, taxable distributions from the Company and
gain from the disposition of shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock generally
will be treated as investment income for purposes of the investment interest
limitations. The Company will notify shareholders after the close of the
Company's taxable year as to the portions of the distributions attributable to
that year that constitute ordinary income, return of capital, and capital gain.
TAXATION OF SHAREHOLDERS ON THE DISPOSITION OF THE COMMON STOCK OR PREFERRED
STOCK
In general, any gain or loss realized upon a taxable disposition of the
Common Stock or Preferred Stock by a shareholder who is not a dealer in
securities will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares
28
<PAGE> 30
of Common Stock or Preferred Stock have been held for more than one year and
otherwise as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any loss upon a sale or
exchange of shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock by a shareholder who has
held such shares for six months or less (after applying certain holding period
rules), will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of
distributions from the Company required to be treated by such shareholder as
long-term capital gain. All or a portion of any loss realized upon a taxable
disposition of the shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock may be disallowed
if the shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock are purchased within 30 days
before or after the disposition.
INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING
The Company will generally report to its shareholders and the Service the
amount of distributions paid during each calendar year, and the amount of tax
withheld, if any. Under the backup withholding rules, a shareholder may be
subject to backup withholding at the rate of 31% with respect to distributions
paid unless such holder (i) is a corporation or comes within certain other
exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact or (ii) provides a
taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup
withholding, and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the
backup withholding rules. A shareholder who does not provide the Company with
his correct taxpayer identification number also may be subject to penalties
imposed by the Service. Any amount paid as backup withholding will be creditable
against the shareholder's income tax liability. In addition, the Company may be
required to withhold a portion of capital gain distributions to any shareholders
who fail to certify their nonforeign status to the Company.
TAXATION OF TAX-EXEMPT SHAREHOLDERS
Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit
sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts ("Exempt Organizations"),
generally are exempt from federal income taxation. However, they are subject to
taxation on their unrelated business taxable income ("UBTI"). While many
investments in real estate generate UBTI, the Service has issued a published
ruling that dividend distributions by a REIT to an exempt employee pension trust
do not constitute UBTI, provided that the shares of the REIT are not otherwise
used in an unrelated trade or business of the exempt employee pension trust.
Thus, amounts distributed by the Company to Exempt Organizations generally
should not constitute UBTI. However, if an Exempt Organization finances its
acquisition of the Common Stock with debt, a portion of its income from the
Company will constitute UBTI pursuant to the "debt-financed property" rules.
Furthermore, social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental
unemployment benefit trusts, and qualified group legal services plans that are
exempt from taxation under paragraphs (7), (9), (17), and (20), respectively, of
Code Section 501(c) are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will
require them to characterize distributions from the Company as UBTI. In
addition, in certain circumstances a pension trust that owns more than 10% of
the Company's shares is required to treat a percentage of the dividends from the
Company as UBTI (the "UBTI Percentage"). The UBTI Percentage is the gross income
derived from an unrelated trade or business (determined as if the Company were a
pension trust) divided by the gross income of the Company for the year in which
the dividends are paid. The UBTI rule applies only if (i) the UBTI Percentage is
at least 5%, (ii) the Company qualifies as a REIT by reason of the modification
of the 5/50 Rule that allows the beneficiaries of the pension trust to be
treated as holding shares of the Company in proportion to their actuarial
interests in the pension trust, and (iii) either (A) one pension trust owns more
than 25% of the value of the Company's shares or (B) a group of pension trusts
individually holding more than 10% of the value of the Company's shares
collectively own more than 50% of the value of the Company's shares.
While an investment in the Company by an Exempt Organization generally is
not expected to result in UBTI except in the circumstances described in the
preceding paragraph, any UBTI that does arise from such an investment will be
combined with all other UBTI of the Exempt Organization for a taxable year. Any
net UBTI will be subject to tax. If the gross income taken into account in
computing UBTI exceeds $1,000, the Exempt Organization is obligated to file a
tax return for such year on IRS Form 990-T. Neither the Company, the Board of
Directors, nor any of their Affiliates expects to undertake the preparation or
filing of IRS Form 990-T for any Exempt Organization in connection with an
investment by such Exempt Organization in the Offered Securities.
29
<PAGE> 31
OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES
State or Local Taxes
The Company, the Partnership, or the Company's shareholders may be subject
to state or local taxation in various state or local jurisdictions, including
those in which it or they own property, transact business, or reside. The state
and local tax treatment of the Company and its shareholders may not conform to
the federal income tax consequences discussed above. CONSEQUENTLY, PROSPECTIVE
SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE EFFECT OF STATE
AND LOCAL TAX LAWS ON AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY.
Dividend Reinvestment Program
Under the Company's Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan,
shareholders participating in the program will be deemed to have received the
gross amount of any cash distributions which would have been paid by the Company
to such shareholders had they not elected to participate. These deemed
distributions will be treated as actual distributions from the Company to the
participating shareholders and will retain the character and tax effect
applicable to distributions from the Company generally. See "-- Taxation of
Shareholders." Shares of Common Stock received under the program will have a
holding period beginning with the day after purchase, and a tax basis equal to
the gross amount of the deemed distribution.
TAX ASPECTS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
Classification as a Partnership
The Company will be entitled to include in its income its distributive
share of the Partnership's income and to deduct its distributive share of the
Partnership's losses only if the Partnership is classified for federal income
tax purposes as a partnership rather than as association taxable as a
corporation. The Company has received an opinion of its counsel, Brobeck,
Phleger & Harrison LLP, that the Partnership will be treated as a partnership
for Federal income tax purposes. This opinion was based on the provisions of the
Partnership Agreement and certain factual representations of the Company and the
Partnership. No assurance can be given that the Service will not challenge the
status of the Partnership as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. If
such challenge were sustained by a court, the Partnership would be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes.
Under Section 7704 of the Code, a partnership is treated as a corporation
for federal income tax purposes if it is a "publicly traded partnership" (except
in situations in which 90% or more of the partnership's gross income is of a
specified type). A partnership is deemed to be publicly traded if its interests
are either (i) traded on an established securities market, or (ii) readily
tradable on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof). While
the Partnership Units will not be traded on an established securities market,
they could possibly be deemed to be traded on a secondary market or its
equivalent due to the redemption rights enabling the partners to dispose of
their Units.
The Treasury Department has issued regulations (the "PTP Regulations")
governing the classification of partnerships under Section 7704. These
regulations provide that the classification of partnerships is generally based
on a facts and circumstances analysis. However, the regulations also provide
limited "safe harbors" which preclude publicly traded partnership status.
Pursuant to one of those safe harbors, interests in a partnership will not be
treated as readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent
thereof if (i) all interests in the partnership were issued in a transaction (or
transactions) that was not required to be registered under the Securities Act,
and (ii) the partnership does not have more than 100 partners at any time during
the partnership's taxable year. In determining the number of partners in a
partnership for this purpose, a person owning an interest in a flowthrough
entity (i.e., a partnership, grantor trust, or S corporation) that owns an
interest in the partnership is treated as a partner in such partnership only if
(x) substantially all of the value of the person's interest in the flow-through
entity is attributable to the flow-through entity's interest (direct or
indirect) in the partnership and (y) a principal purpose of the use of the
tiered arrangement is to permit the partnership to satisfy the 100-partner
limitation. Furthermore, pursuant to Notice 88-75 issued by the Internal Revenue
Service, through the year 2005, an existing partnership may qualify for
non-publicly
30
<PAGE> 32
traded status if it has less than 500 partners (looking through to the ultimate
owners in the case of flow-through entities), does not issue any Units
registered under the Securities Act and does not enter into a substantial new
line of business.
The Partnership currently has less than 100 actual partners and less than
500 partners calculated on a "lookthrough" basis. The Partnership has not issued
any Units required to be registered under the Securities Act. Thus, the
Partnership presently qualifies for the safe harbors provided in Notice 88-75
and the PTP Regulations. However, there is no assurance that the Partnership
will at all times in the future be able to avoid treatment as a publicly traded
partnership.
Even if the Partnership were ever to be classified as a publicly traded
partnership, it would nevertheless be treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes (rather than an association taxable as a corporation) if at
least 90% of its gross income in each taxable year (commencing with the year in
which it is treated as a publicly traded partnership) consists of "qualifying
income" within the meaning of Section 7704(c)(2) of the Code (including
interest, dividends, "real property rents" and gains from the disposition of
real property). The Partnership has represented that, if in any taxable year the
Partnership falls outside of an applicable safe harbor from publicly traded
partnership status, it will satisfy the gross income test set forth in Section
7704(c)(2) of the Code in that taxable year and each subsequent taxable year.
Among other things, this will require that the President of the Company, Mr.
Robert A. Alter (or any other shareholder of the Lessee who owns at least 10% of
the stock of the Lessee) own less than a 5% interest in the Partnership in the
particular taxable year. Counsel's opinion as to the classification of the
Partnership is based on an assumption that the Partnership will either (i)
continue to fall within a safe harbor from publicly traded partnership status,
or (ii) if the Partnership is ever treated as a publicly traded partnership, it
will satisfy the qualifying income test of Section 7704(c)(2) of the Code in the
taxable year in which such treatment commences and all years thereafter.
If for any reason the Partnership were taxable as a corporation, rather
than as a partnership, for federal income tax purposes, the Company would not be
able to satisfy the income and asset requirements for REIT status. Thus the
Company would be subject to tax as a regular corporation and would not receive a
deduction for dividends paid to its shareholders. See "-- Requirements for
Qualification -- Income Tests" and "-- Requirements for Qualification -- Asset
Tests." In addition, any change in the Partnership's status for tax purposes
might be treated as a taxable event, in which case the Company might incur a tax
liability without any related cash distribution. Further, items of income and
deduction of the Partnership would not pass through to its partners, and its
partners would be treated as shareholders for tax purposes. Consequently, the
Partnership would be required to pay income tax at corporate tax rates on its
net income, and distributions to its partners would constitute dividends that
would not be deductible in computing the Partnership's taxable income.
The following discussion assumes that the Partnership will be treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Income Taxation of the Partnership and Its Partners
Partners, Not the Partnership, Subject to Tax. A partnership is not a
taxable entity for federal income tax purposes. Rather, the Company will be
required to take into account its allocable share of the Partnership's income,
gains, losses, deductions, and credits for any taxable year of the Partnership
ending within or with the taxable year of the Company, without regard to whether
the Company has received or will receive any distribution from the Partnership.
Partnership Allocations. Although a partnership agreement generally will
determine the allocation of income and losses among partners, such allocations
will be disregarded for tax purposes under Section 704(b) of the Code if they do
not comply with the provisions of Section 704(b) of the Code and the Treasury
Regulations promulgated thereunder. If an allocation is not recognized for
federal income tax purposes, the item subject to the allocation will be
reallocated in accordance with the partners' interests in the partnership, which
will be determined by taking into account all of the facts and circumstances
relating to the economic arrangement of the partners with respect to such item.
Either legal counsel or the independent
31
<PAGE> 33
public accountants of the Company will render the opinion that the Partnership's
allocations of taxable income and loss comply with the requirements of Section
704(b) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.
Tax Allocations With Respect to Contributed Properties. Pursuant to Section
704(c) of the Code, income, gain, loss, and deduction attributable to
appreciated or depreciated property that is contributed to a partnership in
exchange for an interest in the partnership must be allocated for federal income
tax purposes in a manner such that the contributor is charged with, or benefits
from, the unrealized gain or unrealized loss associated with the property at the
time of the contribution. The amount of such unrealized gain or unrealized loss
is generally equal to the difference between the fair market value of the
contributed property at the time of contribution and the adjusted tax basis of
such property at the time of contribution. The Treasury Department has issued
regulations requiring partnerships to use a "reasonable method" for allocating
items affected by Section 704(c) of the Code and outlining certain reasonable
allocation methods.
Under the Partnership Agreement, depreciation or amortization deductions of
the Partnership generally will be allocated among the partners in accordance
with their respective interests in the Partnership, except to the extent that
the Partnership is required under Code Section 704(c) to use a method for
allocating tax depreciation deductions attributable to contributed properties
that results in the Company receiving a disproportionately large share of such
deductions. In addition, gain on sale of a hotel will be specially allocated to
the Limited Partners (other than the Company as a Limited Partner) to the extent
of any "built-in" gain with respect to such hotel for federal income tax
purposes.
Basis in Partnership Interest. The Company's adjusted tax basis in its
Partnership interest in the Partnership generally will be equal to (i) the
amount of cash and the basis of any other property contributed to the
Partnership by the Company, (ii) increased by (A) its allocable share of the
Partnership's income and (B) its allocable share of indebtedness of the
Partnership, and (iii) reduced, but not below zero, by (A) the Company's
allocable share of the Partnership's loss and (B) the amount of cash distributed
to the Company (including deemed distributions as a result of reductions in the
Company's allocable share of indebtedness of the Partnership).
Treatment of Partnership Distributions. Partnership distributions to the
Company will not generally constitute taxable distributions. However, to the
extent that partnership distributions, or any decrease in the Company's share of
the indebtedness of the Partnership (such decrease being considered a
constructive cash distribution to the partners), exceeds the Company's adjusted
tax basis in its Partnership interest, such distributions (including such
constructive distributions) would constitute taxable income to the Company. Such
distributions and constructive distributions normally would be characterized as
capital gain.
Sale of the Partnership's Property. Generally, any taxable gain realized by
the Partnership on the sale of property by the Partnership held for more than
one year will be long-term capital gain, except for any portion of such gain
that is treated as depreciation or cost recovery recapture. Any taxable gain
recognized by the Partnership on the disposition of any other hotels originally
contributed to the Partnership by the Limited Partners other than the Company
will be allocated first to the Limited Partners (other than the Company as a
Limited Partner) under Section 704(c) of the Code to the extent of their
"built-in gain" on those hotels for federal income tax purposes. The Limited
Partners' "built-in gain" on such hotels sold will equal the excess of the
Limited Partners' proportionate share of the book value of those hotels over the
Limited Partners' tax basis allocable to those hotels at the time of the sale.
Any remaining taxable gain recognized by the Partnership on the disposition of
the hotels will generally be allocated among the partners in accordance with
their respective percentage interests in the Partnership.
The Company's share of any gain realized by the Partnership on the sale of
any property held by the Partnership as inventory or other property held
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of the Partnership's
trade or business will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that
is subject to a 100% penalty tax. Such prohibited transaction income also may
have an adverse effect upon the Company's ability to satisfy the income tests
for REIT status. The Company, however, does not presently intend to allow the
Partnership to acquire or hold any property that represents inventory or other
property held primarily for
32
<PAGE> 34
sale to customers in the ordinary course of the Company's or the Partnership's
trade or business. See "-- Requirements for Qualification -- Income Tests."
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Company may sell the Offered Securities to one or more underwriters for
public offering and sale by them or may sell the Offered Securities to investors
directly or through agents, which agents may be affiliated with the Company.
Any such underwriter or agent involved in the offer and sale of the Offered
Securities will be named in any applicable Prospectus Supplement.
Sales of Offered Securities offered pursuant to any applicable Prospectus
Supplement may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions at a
fixed price or prices which may be changed, at prices related to the prevailing
market prices at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices. The Company also
may, from time to time, authorize underwriters acting as the Company's agents to
offer and sell the Offered Securities upon the terms and conditions set forth in
the applicable Prospectus Supplement. In connection with the sale of Offered
Securities, underwriters may be deemed to have received compensation from the
Company in the form of underwriting discounts or commissions and may also
receive commissions from purchasers of Offered Securities for whom they may act
as agent. Underwriters may sell Offered Securities to or through dealers, and
such dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or
commissions from the underwriters and/or commissions from the purchasers for
whom they may act as agent.
Any underwriting compensation paid by the Company to underwriters or agents
in connection with the offering of Offered Securities, and any discounts,
concessions or commissions allowed by underwriters to participating dealers,
will be set forth in any applicable Prospectus Supplement. Underwriters, dealers
and agents participating in the distribution of the Offered Securities may be
deemed to be underwriters, and any discounts and commissions received by them
and any profit realized by them on resale of the Offered Securities may be
deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.
Underwriters, dealers and agents may be entitled, under agreements entered into
with the Company and the Partnership, to indemnification against and
contribution toward certain civil liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act. Any such indemnification agreements will be described in any
applicable Prospectus Supplement.
Unless otherwise specified in any related Prospectus Supplement, each
series of Offered Securities will be a new issue with no established trading
market, other than the Common Stock which is listed on the NYSE. Any shares of
Common Stock sold pursuant to a Prospectus Supplement will be listed on such
exchange, subject to official notice of issuance. The Company may elect to list
any class or series of Preferred Stock and any series of Warrants on any
exchange, but neither is obligated to do so. It is possible that one or more
underwriters may make a market in a series of Offered Securities, but will not
be obligated to do so and may discontinue any market making at any time without
notice. Therefore, no assurance can be given as to the liquidity of the trading
market for the Offered Securities.
If so indicated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the Company may
authorize dealers acting as the Company's agents to solicit offers by certain
institutions to purchase Offered Securities from the Company at the public
offering price set forth in such Prospectus Supplement pursuant to Delayed
Delivery Contracts ("Contracts") providing for payment and delivery on the date
or dates stated in such Prospectus Supplement. Each Contract will be for an
amount not less than, and the aggregate principal amount of Offered Securities
sold pursuant to Contracts shall be not less nor more than, the respective
amounts stated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. Institutions with whom
Contracts, when authorized, may be made include commercial and savings banks,
insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and
charitable institutions, and other institutions but will in all cases be subject
to the approval of the Company, as the case may be. Contracts will not be
subject to any conditions except (i) the purchase by an institution of the
Offered Securities covered by its Contracts shall not at the time of delivery be
prohibited under the laws of any jurisdiction in the United States to which such
institution is subject, and (ii) if the Offered Securities are
33
<PAGE> 35
being sold to underwriters, the Company, as the case may be, shall have sold to
such underwriters the total principal amount of the Offered Securities less the
principal amount thereof covered by Contracts.
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates may be customers of,
engage in transactions with and perform services for, the Company or the
Partnership in the ordinary course of business.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Offered Securities will be passed upon for the Company
by Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP, Newport Beach, California. In rendering its
opinions, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP will rely on the opinion of Ballard
Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, Baltimore, Maryland, as to certain matters of
Maryland law. Roger Cohen, a partner at Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP, is
Assistant Secretary of the Company and owns 2,576 shares of Common Stock and has
been granted options to purchase 3,000 shares of Common Stock. In addition, the
description of federal income tax consequences contained in the section of this
Prospectus entitled "United States Federal Income Tax Considerations" and
certain federal income tax matters pertaining to the Company's status as a REIT
will be based on the opinion of the Company's tax advisor.
EXPERTS
The following financial statements have been audited by Coopers & Lybrand
L.L.P., independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon included
therein and incorporated herein by reference: (1) the consolidated financial
statements of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995,
and for the year ended December 31, 1996, and the period August 16, 1995
(inception) through December 31, 1995, and the combined financial statements of
Sunstone Initial Hotels (Predecessor) for the period January 1, 1995 through
August 15, 1995, and for the year ended December 31, 1994, the financial
statements of Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. (the Lessee) as of December 31,
1996 and 1995, and for the year ended December 31, 1996 and the period August
16, 1995 (inception) through December 31, 1995, all appearing in the Company's
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996; (2) the
financial statements of Markland Hotel, Inc. as of May 31, 1997 and for the year
then ended, the financial statements of the Gateway Center Group, as of December
31, 1996 and for the year then ended, the financial statements of the Holiday
Inn Mission Valley Stadium Hotel, as of May 31, 1997 and for the period from
June 12, 1996 (date of acquisition) to May 31, 1997, and the financial
statements of TSB Crystal Partnership, as of December 31, 1996 and for the year
then ended, which reports appear in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A
filed August 22, 1997; and, (3) the financial statements of Ventura Hospitality
Partners L.P. as of December 31, 1995 and July 31, 1996, and for the period from
July 22, 1995 (inception) to December 31, 1995, and the seven months ended July
31, 1996, appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed January
7, 1997. Such financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in
reliance upon such reports given upon the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Kent Hospitality Partners, L.P. as of and for
the year ended October 31, 1996 have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP,
independent public accountants, as set forth in their report with respect
thereto and incorporated herein by reference. Such financial statements are
incorporated by reference in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts
in giving said report.
The consolidated financial statements of Kahler Realty Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, December 31, 1995, and January 1, 1995 and
for the years then ended have been included in the Registration Statement of
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. dated as of August 25, 1997, in reliance upon the
reports of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent certified public accountants,
appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
34
<PAGE> 36
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTANTS
The Company selected Ernst & Young LLP on July 11, 1997 for engagement as
the Company's independent accountants to report on the Company's consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1997. The decision to select Ernst & Young LLP was approved by the Standing
Audit Committee (the "Audit Committee") of the Company's Board of Directors,
which Audit Committee consists of four of the Company's independent directors.
The change in accountants was made in accordance with the Company's policy to
periodically solicit bids for the engagement of independent public accountants.
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. had acted as the Company's independent accountants
prior to July 11, 1997, and was dismissed on that date by the decision of the
Audit Committee. None of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.'s reports on the Company's
financial statements for any of the years on which Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
reported contained an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were the
opinions modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, nor
were there any events of the type requiring disclosure under Item 304(a)(1)(v)
of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. There were no disagreements with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., resolved or unresolved, on any matter of accounting
principles, which, if not resolved to Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.'s satisfaction,
would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement
in connection with its reports.
35
<PAGE> 37
======================================================
NO PERSONS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY
REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS
AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED
UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO
SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO
WHICH IT RELATES, OR AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION WITH RESPECT TO THOSE SECURITIES
TO WHICH IT RELATES TO ANY PERSONS IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE SUCH OFFER OR
SOLICITATION WOULD BE UNLAWFUL. THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS AT ANY TIME DOES
NOT IMPLY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED HEREIN AT ITS DATE IS
CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO ITS DATE.
------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Available Information................... 2
Incorporation of Certain Information by
Reference............................. 2
The Company............................. 3
Use of Proceeds......................... 4
Risk Factors............................ 5
Description of Common Stock and
Preferred Stock....................... 12
Description of Warrants................. 17
Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and
of the Company's Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws.............. 18
United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations........................ 21
Plan of Distribution.................... 33
Legal Matters........................... 34
Experts................................. 34
Change in Accountants................... 35
</TABLE>
======================================================
======================================================
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
[LOGO]
COMMON STOCK
PREFERRED STOCK
WARRANTS
---------------------
PROSPECTUS
---------------------
SEPTEMBER , 1997
======================================================
<PAGE> 38
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The estimated expenses in connection with the offering are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT PAID
OR TO
BE PAID
-----------
<S> <C>
SEC Registration fee............................................. $ 98,485
New York Stock Exchange listing fees............................. 30,000
Legal fees and expenses.......................................... 300,000
Accounting fees and expenses..................................... 300,000
Blue sky fees and expenses....................................... 5,000
Transfer Agent and Registrar fees................................ 20,000
Printing and engraving fees...................................... 100,000
Miscellaneous.................................................... 46,515
---------
Total.................................................. $ 900,000
=========
</TABLE>
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
Section 2-418 of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the "MGCL") empowers
the Company to indemnify, subject to the standards set forth therein, any person
who is a party in any action in connection with any action, suit or proceeding
brought or threatened by reason of the fact that the person was a director,
officer, employee or agent of such company, or is or was serving as such with
respect to another entity at the request of such company. The MGCL also provides
that the Company may purchase insurance on behalf of any such director, officer,
employee or agent.
The Company's Articles of Incorporation provide for indemnification of the
officers and directors of the Company substantially identical in scope to that
permitted under Section 2-418 of the MGCL. The Bylaws of the Company also
provide that the expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending any
action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, must be paid by the Company as they are incurred and in advance
of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an
undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay all amounts so
advanced if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction
that the officer or director is not entitled to be indemnified by the Company,
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its
directors and executive officers. In addition, the Company maintains a
directors' and officers' liability policy.
The Company's Charter limits the liability of the Company's directors and
officers for money damages to the Company and its shareholders to the fullest
extent permitted from time to time by Maryland law. Maryland law presently
permits the liability of directors and officers to a corporation or its
shareholders for money damages to be limited, except (i) to the extent that it
is proved that the director or officer actually received an improper benefit or
profit or (ii) if a judgment or other final adjudication is entered in a
proceeding based on a finding that the director's or officer's action, or
failure to act, was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and was
material to the cause of action adjudicated in the proceeding. This provision
does not limit the ability of the Company or its shareholders to obtain other
relief, such as an injunction or rescission.
II-1
<PAGE> 39
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement.*
2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement Among the Company, Westbrook Real Estate Fund I, L.P.,
Westbrook Real Estate Co -- Investment Partnership I, L.P. and Kahler Realty
Corporation Dated as of August 5, 1997. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 1997 and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3.1 Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as further amended by the
Articles of Amendment of the Company, as filed with the State Department of
Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on November 9, 1994. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to
the Company's Registration Statement No. 33-84346 and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as currently in effect.*
3.3 Articles of Amendment of the Company, as filed with the State Department of
Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on June 19, 1995. Filed as Exhibit 3.3 to
the Company's Registration Statement No. 33-84346 and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3.4 Articles of Amendment of the Company, as filed with the State Department of
Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on May 2, 1997.
3.5 Form of Articles Supplementary of the Company designating the 7.9% Cumulative
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock filed as an exhibit to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 1997 and incorporated
herein by this reference.
4.1 Form of Certificate of Articles Supplementary designating Preferred Stock.*
4.2 Form of Warrant Agreement.*
5.1 Opinion of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP as to legality of shares being
registered.*
5.2 Opinion of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll as to Maryland law.*
8.1 Tax Opinion.*
23.1 Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
23.2 Consent of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll (Included with opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.2).*
23.3 Consent of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP (Included with opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.1).*
23.4 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.
23.5 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
24.1 Power of Attorney (included in signature page).
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* To be filed by amendment or incorporated by reference in connection with any
Offered Securities.
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being
made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act");
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after
the effective date of this Registration Statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment hereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth
in this Registration Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
increase or decrease in volume of securities offered
II-2
<PAGE> 40
(if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that
which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high and of the
estimated maximum offering price may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the
aggregate the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20
percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
"Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration
statement; and
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan
of distribution not previously disclosed in this Registration Statement
or any material change to such information in this Registration
Statement.
Provided, however, that paragraphs (i) and (ii) do not apply if the
information is required to be included in a post-effective amendment by
those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed by the Company
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") that are incorporated by
reference in this Registration Statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a
new registration statement relating to the securities offered herein, and
the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the
initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment
any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act, each filing of the Company's
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
that is incorporated by reference into this Registration Statement shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
herein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
Registrant pursuant to the provisions described under Item 15 above, or
otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities
and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such
liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or
paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrants hereby further undertake that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part
of this registration statement in reliance under Rule 430A and contained in
a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or
(4), or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this
registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of
prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to
the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that
time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-3
<PAGE> 41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant
certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all the
requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this Registration
Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of San Clemente, State of California, on August 25,
1997.
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
By: /s/ ROBERT A. ALTER
------------------------------------
Robert A. Alter
President, Secretary and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned directors of
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., a Maryland corporation, do hereby constitute and
appoint Robert A. Alter and Charles L. Biederman and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments)
to this Registration Statement, or any related registration statement filed
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, and to file the same,
with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in connection therewith,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or
his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof. This Power of Attorney may be signed in several counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney as of the date indicated.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 this
Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- --------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ ROBERT A. ALTER President, Secretary and August 25, 1997
- --------------------------------------------- Chairman of the Board of
Robert A. Alter Directors (Principal
Executive Officer)
/s/ KENNETH J. BIEHL Vice President and Chief August 25, 1997
- --------------------------------------------- Financial Officer
Kenneth J. Biehl (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
/s/ CHARLES L. BIEDERMAN Executive Vice President August 25, 1997
- --------------------------------------------- and Director
Charles L. Biederman
/s/ H. RAYMOND BINGHAM Director August 25, 1997
- ---------------------------------------------
H. Raymond Bingham
</TABLE>
II-4
<PAGE> 42
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- --------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ C. ROBERT ENEVER Director August 25, 1997
- ---------------------------------------------
C. Robert Enever
Director
- ---------------------------------------------
Laurence S. Geller
Director
- ---------------------------------------------
Fredric H. Gould
Director
- ---------------------------------------------
David Lambert
/s/ EDWARD H. SONDKER Director August 25, 1997
- ---------------------------------------------
Edward H. Sondker
</TABLE>
II-5
<PAGE> 43
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEQUENTIALLY
EXHIBIT NUMBERED
NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE
------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
<C> <S> <C>
1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement*.......................................
2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement Among the Company, Westbrook Real Estate Fund
I, L.P., Westbrook Real Estate Co -Investment Partnership I, L.P. and
Kahler Realty Corporation Dated as of August 5, 1997. Filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 1997
and incorporated herein by this reference.............................
3.1 Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as further amended
by the Articles of Amendment of the Company, as filed with the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on November 9,
1994. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement No.
33-84346 and incorporated herein by this reference....................
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as currently in
effect.*..............................................................
3.3 Articles of Amendment of the Company, as filed with the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on June 19, 1995.
Filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's Registration Statement No.
33-84346 and incorporated herein by this reference....................
3.4 Articles of Amendment of the Company, as filed with the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on May 2, 1997.
3.5 Form of Articles Supplementary of the Company designating the 7.9%
Cumulative Convertible Series A Preferred Stock filed as an exhibit to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August
13, 1997 and incorporated herein by this reference....................
4.1 Form of Certificate of Articles Supplementary designating Preferred
Stock.*
4.2 Form of Warrant Agreement*............................................
5.1 Opinion of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP as to legality of shares
being registered*.....................................................
5.2 Opinion of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll as to Maryland law*......
8.1 Tax Opinion*..........................................................
23.1 Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P....................................
23.2 Consent of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll (Included with opinion
filed as Exhibit 5.2)*................................................
23.3 Consent of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP (Included with opinion
filed as Exhibit 5.1)*................................................
23.4 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP........................................
23.5 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP......................................
24.1 Power of Attorney (included in signature page)........................
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* To be filed by amendment or incorporated by reference in connection with any
Offered Securities.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 3.4
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., a Maryland corporation, having its
principal office in the State of Maryland at c/o The Prentice-Hall Corporation
System, Inc., 11 East Chase Street, Suite 7-C, Baltimore, Maryland 21202
(hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:
FIRST: The Corporation hereby amends its Charter as currently in effect
by deleting in its entirety the definition of "Independent Director" in
SUBSECTION
(c) of SECTION 1 of ARTICLE VI of the Charter, and by inserting, in lieu
thereof, the following: c. Independent Directors. Notwithstanding anything
herein to the contrary, at all times (except during a period not to exceed sixty
(60) days following the death, resignation, incapacity or removal from office of
a director prior to expiration of the director's term of office), a majority of
the Board of Directors shall be comprised of persons who are not officers or
employees of the Corporation.
SECOND: The amendment to the Charter of the Corporation as hereinabove
set forth was duly advised by the Board of Directors of the Corporation and
approved by the stockholders of the Corporation, as required by law.
THIRD: The amendments set forth herein do not change the authorized
stock of the Corporation.
FOURTH: By resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation,
Roger M. Cohen, Esquire has been authorized as agent to witness these Articles
of Amendment.
FIFTH: The undersigned President acknowledges these Articles of
Amendment to be the corporate act of the Corporation and, as to all matters or
facts required to be verified
1
<PAGE> 2
under oath, the undersigned President acknowledges that to the best of his
knowledge, information and belief, these matters and facts are true in all
material respects and that this statement is made under the penalties for
perjury.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of
Amendment to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its President and
witnessed by its authorized agent on this 30th day of April, 1997.
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
By: /S/ Robert A. Alter (Seal)
---------------------------
Name: Robert A. Alter
Title: President
WITNESS:
By: /S/ Roger M. Cohen
-----------------------
Name: Roger M. Cohen, Esquire
Title: Authorized Agent
2
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. on Form S-3 being filed under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, of our report dated February 28, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Sunstone
Hotel Investors, Inc. and Sunstone Hotels (the Predecessor), and of our report
dated February 28, 1997, on our audit of the financial statements of Sunstone
Hotel Properties, Inc. (the Lessee) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December
31, 1996, of our report dated July 17, 1997 on our audit of the financial
statements of Markland Hotel, Inc., for the year ended May 31, 1997, of our
report dated July 18, 1997 on our audit of the financial statements of the
Gateway Center Group, for the year ended December 31, 1996, of our report dated
August 7, 1997 on our audit of the financial statements of the Holiday Inn
Mission Valley Stadium Hotel, for the year ended May 31, 1997, and of our report
dated August 7, 1997 on our audit of the financial statements of TSB Crystal
Partnership, for the year ended December 31, 1996, which reports appear in the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed August 22, 1997, and of our report
dated November 22, 1996 on our audits of the financial statements of Ventura
Hospitality Partners L.P., appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K/A filed January 7, 1997. We also consent to the reference to our firm under
the caption "Experts."
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
San Francisco, California
August 25, 1997
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.4
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the reference to
our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the use of our report dated
December 20, 1996, with respect to the financial statements of Kent Hospitality
Partners, L.P. incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-3
and related Prospectus of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. dated August 25, 1997.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Houston, Texas
August 25, 1997
<PAGE> 1
[PEAT MARWICK LLP LOGO]
EXHIBIT 23.5
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our reports dated August 15, 1997, and February 16, 1996, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Kahler Realty Corporation
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-3 and related
Prospectus of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. dated August 25, 1997.
/s/ KMPG PEAT MARWICK LLP
---------------------------
KMPG Peat Marwick LLP
Chicago, Illinois
August 22, 1997
