AETNA GENERATION PORTFOLIOS INC
DEFA14A, 1996-05-21
Previous: AETNA GENERATION PORTFOLIOS INC, DEFA14A, 1996-05-21
Next: RICKS CABARET INTERNATIONAL INC, S-8, 1996-05-21



                           Proposal Summary and Q&A

CONFIDENTIAL:  THIS  DOCUMENT  IS  ONLY  FOR USE IN  ORAL  COMMUNICATION  WITH
CUSTOMERS AFTER A PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED. IT IS NOT TO
BE SHARED OR DUPLICATED.

The Board of Trustees of the Aetna Variable Fund has  unanimously  recommended
that the fund's  advisory fees be increased  from .25% to .50%. If approved by
shareholders, the new advisory fee will be effective August 1, 1996. To assist
you  in  answering   questions  that  may  arise,  the  following   background
information and Q&A are provided to you.

BACKGROUND - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT FACTS

     o   Aetna Variable Fund, which began operations in 1974, set its advisory
         fee at an annual  rate of .25% of  average  daily net  assets and has
         never changed it. 
     o   Over the  past  several  years  the  financial  markets  have  become
         increasingly  complex  and the need for high  quality  personnel  and
         equipment  has increased  proportionately.  With the recent growth in
         the mutual fund industry,  resources such as  high-quality  personnel
         and  state-of-the-art  equipment  and  facilities  have  become  more
         expensive and harder to retain.  
     o   Aetna  believes  these  trends will  continue  and that the  proposed
         advisory fee is critical to obtaining and  retaining  the  additional
         resources  necessary  for  it  to  continue  providing  high  quality
         management  to the Fund in an  increasingly  competitive  and dynamic
         environment.  
     o   We've  already made  significant  investments  within our  investment
         organization  during  the last  two  years  in  response  to this new
         competitive environment. The goal was and is to enhance our portfolio
         management  capabilities  in  order to  better  assist  customers  in
         achieving their long term savings and investment objectives. To date,
         the  changes  that have  been  implemented,  such as the  hiring of a
         number of highly qualified and experienced  investment  professionals
         with a breadth  of  different  technical  expertise,  the  design and
         implementation  of new quantitative  research and analytic tools, and
         significant  upgrades  in  data  bases,  information  management  and
         reporting  systems,  have  added  depth  to the  investment  team and
         portfolio management strategies now in place.


<PAGE>


     o   In approving  the fee increase,  the Board of Trustees  asked for and
         received extensive data concerning:
   --->  the nature, quality and scope of the services which would be provided
         after the merger;  (see proposal two in preliminary  proxy  statement
         for  details  regarding   proposal  to  combine  Aetna's   investment
         management operations with another Aetna affiliate, Aeltus Investment
         Management, Inc.)
   --->  Aetna's profitability and financial condition;
   --->  the Fund's  expense  ratios before and after the fee increase as well
         as those of its peers; and 
   --->  Aetna's current fee level in general, and as compared to fees for the
         Fund's competitive peer group.

     o   The  Trustees'  approval of the new Advisory  Agreement and increased
         fee was based on the following factors,  all of which they considered
         material.  These factors are listed in order of importance,  with the
         most important factor listed first.
   --->  The new fee will provide Aetna with the essential financial resources
         it needs to compete  effectively in the increasingly  competitive and
         complex financial markets.
   --->  The Trustees  believe that Aetna should  receive a fair,  competitive
         fee in order to provide it with  adequate  resources  to produce  and
         provide  competitive,  high  quality  services on behalf of the Fund;
         yet, Aetna Variable Fund's existing fee has been in effect since 1974
         and is the  lowest fee among the  Fund's 44 member  competitive  peer
         group analyzed by Lipper.
   --->  The new fee would  compensate  Aetna for  costly  enhancements  it is
         currently  maintaining  and  which  have  been made over the past two
         years  with  regard to  investment,  administrative  operational  and
         shareholder services. These enhancements include:

         I.    hiring a number of highly qualified and experienced  investment
               professionals;
         II.   implementing  a new  compensation  system to attract and retain
               such personnel;
         III.  instituting the use of new quantitative research and analytical
               tools and techniques; and
         IV.   upgrading its information and reporting systems.
   --->  The new fee  would  reflect  the  benefits  to be  derived  from  the
         combination   of   Aetna's   and   Aeltus'   investment    management
         capabilities.  (see proposal two in preliminary  proxy  statement for
         details)


                                      -2-

<PAGE>


     o   Another key  business  reason for the decision to revisit the current
         advisory  fee  level  is  the  competitive  need  to  include  in our
         contracts  funds offered by unaffiliated  third parties.  The current
         fee was set at a time when the Fund was being sold primarily  through
         group variable Contracts and after 1982, exclusively through variable
         contracts.
         -     Until  recently,  Aetna,  like most other providers of variable
               products,  used its own mutual funds as the investment  options
               under the Contracts.  As a result, Aetna took all its costs and
               charges  for  the  entire   product   into   consideration   in
               determining  its profits on its  Contracts and did not evaluate
               the  profitability of the Fund as a separate product as did its
               competitors.  
         -     Recently,  variable  products have  exploded in popularity  and
               growth and many non-insurance companies have developed funds to
               be sold  through  Contracts  issued by  unaffiliated  insurance
               companies. 
         -     To  remain  competitive,  during  the past  five  years,  Aetna
               expanded the funds it offered under its  Contracts  from almost
               exclusively  its own to include a large number of funds offered
               by unaffiliated  third parties.  This expansion caused Aetna to
               look  separately at the Contract and the Fund,  and to evaluate
               the costs and profitability of its various products, as well as
               the charges associated with all of these products.


                                      -3-

<PAGE>

CUSTOMER Q&A

THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE USED TO ORALLY RESPOND TO CUSTOMER INQUIRIES ABOUT THE
FEE  INCREASE   PROPOSAL  AFTER  A  PRELIMINARY   PROXY   STATEMENT  HAS  BEEN
DELIVERED.IT SHOULD NOT BE DISTRIBUTED OR REPRODUCED.

WHEN WAS AETNA VARIABLE FUND'S ADVISORY FEE LAST CHANGED?
Aetna Variable  Fund's  advisory fee was set when the fund began in 1974 at an
annual rate of .25% of average daily net assets and has never been increased.

HOW DOES THE PROPOSED FEE STACK UP AGAINST THOSE CHARGED FOR COMPARABLE FUNDS?
According to data from Lipper Analytical Services, Inc., Aetna Variable Fund's
current fees are the lowest in its 44 member  competitive peer group of growth
and income  funds.  Even with the proposed  increases,  the fees will be lower
than the average fee of a competitive peer group.

WHAT OTHER  FEES OR  CHARGES  ARE PAID TO AETNA  LIFE  INSURANCE  AND  ANNUITY
COMPANY ("AETNA") BY THE FUND?
Prior to May 1,  1996 the fund  pays  Aetna  the  allocable  cost for  Aetna's
provision of certain services.  As of May 1, 1996 Aetna will pay, on behalf of
the fund, all ordinary recurring expenses related to managing the fund such as
legal fees,  Trustees' fees,  custodial fees and insurance premiums,  and will
provide some administrative services. The Aetna Variable Fund will pay Aetna a
fixed fee at an annual rate of .06% of the Fund's average daily net assets for
these  payments and  services.  Aetna  assumes the risk that its costs and the
fund's expenses may increase, so even if actual expenses exceed .06%, the fund
will not be charged.

HOW DOES THE VOTING PROCESS WORK?
Group contractholders vote all the shares attributable to their contract. This
means the Plan Sponsors or Trustees in the 457, 401(k)/401(a),  and HR10 plans
vote all the  shares  attributable  to their  plans.  Shares are voted by each
individual  participant or contractholder in Individual  Non-qualified Annuity
plans, 408(b) (IRA) accounts,  and Registered Variable Life plans.  Individual
participants also vote shares  attributable to their accounts in 403(b) plans,
but  the  Plan  sponsor  must  sign a Group  Authorization  form  which  gives
permission to accept the votes of the individual  participants  in their plan.
If the Group Authorization form is not returned,  all shares for that plan are
voted in the same  proportion  to the rest of the votes  returned  within that
separate account.  Assuming the Group Authorization Form is returned, if , for
example,  10% of the total shares within a 403(b) plan oppose the proposal and
20% are returned in favor of the proposal,  the remaining 70% are voted in the
same 2 to 1 proportion as those returned, resulting in a vote for that plan of
67% in favor and 33% opposed.  With the  exception of Separate  Account D, all
shares  attributable to those contracts for which proxy cards are not returned
are voted in the same proportion to those votes received.  Shares not returned
in

                                      -4-

<PAGE>

Separate  Account D will not be  voted.  See page 2 of the  preliminary  proxy
statement for more information regarding the voting process.

WHAT  RETURN  RATE  IS  NEEDED  FOR  THE  PROPOSAL  TO  PASS?  DO  50%  OF THE
SHAREHOLDERS NEED TO RESPOND?
All shares  voted at the  meeting  will be  counted as present at the  meeting
whether they vote for,  against or abstain on the Proposals.  More than 50% of
the total  outstanding  shares of the Fund must be present  at the  meeting to
have a quorum to conduct  business.  Proposal  2  (approval  of a  Subadvisory
Agreement) and Proposal 3 (Approval of Investment  Advisory Agreement) require
the vote of a "majority of the outstanding  voting  securities" of the Fund to
be approved.  The remaining  proposals can be approved by the vote of a simple
majority of the shares present at the meeting.  A "majority of the outstanding
voting  securities" of the Fund means 67% of the shares of the Fund present at
the meeting,  assuming a majority of the shares are present;  or more than 50%
of all the  outstanding  voting  securities  of the Fund,  if less.  A vote to
abstain  is  effectively  a  negative  vote  since the  proposals  require  an
affirmative vote to be approved. See page 2 of the preliminary proxy statement
for more information regarding the voting process.

HOW WILL THIS CHANGE IMPACT PERFORMANCE?
That's impossible to predict, but one of the reasons the Board is recommending
the proposed  changes is to provide Aetna with  adequate  resources to produce
and  provide  competitive,  high  quality  services  on  behalf  of the  Fund.
Remember,  AVF's  existing fee has been in effect since 1974 and is the lowest
fee among the Fund's 44 member competitive peer group analyzed by Lipper.

HOW DO YOU  RESPOND  TO  RECENT  ARTICLES  IN THE  PRESS  SUGGESTING  THAT FEE
INCREASES  SHOULD BE VOTED DOWN, OR THAT FEES SHOULD BE DECREASING  INSTEAD OF
INCREASING?
Aetna  Variable  Fund's  current  advisory fee is among the lowest in its peer
group.  It has not been  increased  since the fund's  inception  in 1974.  The
increase  we  are  seeking  will  still  leave  us  at  the   midpoint   range
competitively,  and will allow us to continue to make investments in personnel
and tools to effectively  manage the fund. Fee increases in and of themselves,
are not  inherently  bad. You must look at the purpose of the increase and the
current  level of fees to  determine  if it is fair and  reasonable  or merely
increasing  revenues of the funds. In our case, we have clearly  indicated the
reasons  for  the  increase  and  the  use of the  increased  revenues  in the
preliminary proxy statement.

                                      -5-

<PAGE>


                                      
NOTE:  THE FOLLOWING TWO QUESTIONS  REFERENCE  FUNDS OTHER THAN AVF UPON WHICH
THE  BOARD  HAS  RECOMMENDED  A FEE  INCREASE.  AT  THIS  TIME  ONLY  THE  AVF
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT HAS BEEN FILED. THE POTENTIAL FEE INCREASE FOR THE
OTHER FUNDS  SHOULD ONLY BE  DISCUSSED  TO ALERT THE  CUSTOMER  THAT OTHER FEE
INCREASES  HAVE BEEN APPROVED AS WELL.  FURTHER  DISCUSSIONS  REGARDING  FUNDS
OTHER THAN AVF SHOULD BE DEFERRED UNTIL  PRELIMINARY  PROXY  STATEMENTS CAN BE
DELIVERED.

DID THE BOARD RECOMMEND CHANGES TO THE ADVISORY FEES OF ANY OF THE OTHER AETNA
FUNDS?
Yes, the Board recommended shareholders vote to approve increases on the 
following funds in addition to AVF:
Aetna Income Shares:            .15%  (.40% total proposed advisory fee)
Aetna Investment Advisors Fund: .25%  (.50% total proposed advisory fee)
Aetna Generation Portfolios:    .10%  (.60% total proposed advisory fee)

WHAT HAS THE BOARD APPROVED FOR ADMINISTRATION  FEES FOR THE OTHER AETNA FUNDS
AS OF 5/1/95?
As discussed in an earlier question,  Prior to May 1, 1996 the fund pays Aetna
the allocable  cost for Aetna's  provision of certain  services.  As of May 1,
1996 Aetna will pay, on behalf of the fund,  all ordinary  recurring  expenses
related to managing  the fund such as legal fees,  Trustees'  fees,  custodial
fees and insurance premiums,  and will provide some  administrative  services.
The Aetna  Variable  Fund will pay Aetna a fixed fee at an annual rate of .06%
of the Fund's average daily net assets for these payments and services.  Aetna
assumes the risk that its costs and the fund's expenses may increase,  so even
if actual expenses exceed .06%, the fund will not be charged. As of 5/1/96 the
other  funds will pay Aetna a fixed fee at an annual  rate of .08% on AIAF and
AIS, and .15% on the  Generation  Portfolios.  Note that by capping the fee at
 .15% on the  Generation  Portfolios,  the total  fees for those  funds will be
reduced.


                                      -6-

<PAGE>


FIELD Q&A

THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO RESPOND TO YOUR QUESTIONS AS FIELD  MANAGERS.  IT
SHOULD NOT BE DISTRIBUTED OR REPRODUCED.

TO WHOM IS THIS INFORMATION PACKAGE BEING DISTRIBUTED? WHEN?
All Annuity and Pension Field Managers will receive a copy of this package. It
is not to be  duplicated.  You should keep the  attached  information  package
close at hand for  providing  guidance  when  customers  contact  you  seeking
information  regarding the proxy process or proposed fee increase.  Please use
this information for verbal  communication with customers as needed.  While we
anticipate that members of the Career Distribution  Channel,  especially those
housed in filed offices,  will become aware of this proposal,  it is important
that  we  are  careful  about  the   dissemination   of  this  information  to
distribution  channels that represent more than one company. The filing of the
preliminary  proxy statement does technically  make this  information  public,
however it would not be in the best interest of ALIAC or the funds to have the
information shared broadly with competitors or customers who may have carriers
other than Aetna in their plan. The proposed fee increase will be communicated
to all  distribution  channels near the time of the definitive proxy statement
filing (May 8-10, 1996) so they can respond to customer questions. If you have
a producer who requires a written copy of these materials before then, contact
Sheila Litchfield (860-273-3925 or profs id T9SZL) and one will be provided.

WITH  WHOM  DO I NEED  TO  COMMUNICATE  IN  ADVANCE  OF THE  DEFINITIVE  PROXY
STATEMENT MAILING?
Funds recently experiencing successful proxy votes for fee increases did so by
letting the definitive  proxy statement be the primary  communication  vehicle
with most customers.  No communication  should be initiated with a customer or
sponsor unless you are speaking to them for another reason such as the case is
in the midst of  renegotiation,  or the case has been  identified to receive a
contract fee reduction  based on other  criteria.  The contract fee reductions
are not  directly  related to the  proposed  fee  increase and will take place
regardless of whether the fee increase is approved.  Accordingly, the contract
fee reduction and the proposed fee increase  should not be linked  together or
discussed  as being  contingent  upon one  another in any  conversations  with
customers.  You should keep the attached information package close at hand for
providing  guidance when customers contact you seeking  information  regarding
the proxy process or proposed fee increase.

WHEN WILL CUSTOMERS RECEIVE THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND PROXY CARDS?
Definitive proxy statements and proxy cards will be mailed to all shareholders
on May 8-10, 1996.

WHAT IS THE COST OF THE INCREASE TO AVERAGE INVESTOR?

The fee increase will result in an additional  fee  equivalent to 25 cents for
every $100 invested.

                                      -7-

<PAGE>


HOW MUCH OF THE FEE INCREASE WILL COVER  ADDITIONAL  EXPENSES  ASSOCIATED WITH
MANAGING THE FUND VERSUS PROFIT FOR AETNA?
As noted earlier,  many competitive  funds have higher fees than ours and have
further  increased  their  fees to  increase  revenues.  Our plans for the fee
increase have been  outlined in the  preliminary  proxy  statement and clearly
represent an investment in the future of our business.

SHOULD THE FIELD BE PREPARED TO MANAGE ALL CUSTOMER  QUESTIONS  ONCE CUSTOMERS
RECEIVE THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT?
No. A separate 800# is being set up to handle customer  questions  specific to
the proxy  process.  The phone number will be clearly  identified on the first
page of the definitive  proxy statement.  However,  this number will not be in
operation until the definitive  proxy statements and proxy cards are mailed in
May, so questions from  customers who learn of it before the definitive  proxy
statements and proxy cards are mailed will likely contact you directly.  Also,
some  customers  may choose to contact you directly  upon  receiving the proxy
package instead of using the 800 #. You should keep this  information  package
close at hand so you are prepared to respond in the event that a customer does
contact you directly.

CAN I ASK FOR A  COMMITMENT  OF A YES VOTE BEFORE THE  CUSTOMER  RECEIVES  THE
DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT?
While you can discuss the  rationale  for seeking the fee  increase in general
terms as outlined in the  enclosed  preliminary  proxy  statement,  you cannot
obtain a signed proxy card from a shareholder until after the definitive proxy
statement are mailed.  Any "commitment"  obtained cannot be binding and cannot
substitute for a proxy card signed by the shareholder.

CAN I HAND DELIVER THE PROXY CARD TO THE PLAN  SPONSOR  INSTEAD OF HAVING
IT ARRIVE IN THE MAIL? 
All original proxy cards must be mailed directly to the shareholders. However,
duplicate  copies of definitive  proxy statements and cards can be printed for
managers who wish to bring these materials with them to plan sponsor meetings.
In the event both cards are  returned,  the last one received  will be used in
the tabulation. Duplicate proxy materials will be accompanied by procedures to
be followed for hand-delivery to customers.

WILL CUSTOMERS BE VOTING ON OTHER ISSUES BESIDES THE FEE INCREASE?
Yes, in addition to voting on a new  advisory  agreement  with a change to the
investment  advisory fee paid by the fund,  shareholders will also be asked to
vote on election of Trustees,  an amendment to the Declaration of Trust, and a
new  sub-advisory  arrangement  which  would  reflect the  combination  of the
investment management operations of Aetna and Aeltus.

HOW WILL THE RESULTS OF THE VOTE BE COMMUNICATED TO CUSTOMERS? 
Customers will be notified of the results as soon as practical after the vote.
We are currently  reviewing  options for getting this  information out quickly
and effectively.


                                      -8-


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission