UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
( X ) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission File Number 1-7349
Ball Corporation
State of Indiana 35-0160610
10 Longs Peak Drive, P.O. Box 5000
Broomfield, Colorado 80021-2510
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (303) 469-3131
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
--------------------------------- --------------------------------
Common Stock, without par value New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
Pacific Exchange, Inc.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES [ X ] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was $804.7 million based upon the closing market price on March 3,
2000 (excluding Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock of the registrant,
which series is not publicly traded and which has an aggregate liquidation
preference of $56.2 million).
Number of shares outstanding as of the latest practicable date.
Class Outstanding at March 5, 2000
- ------------------------------- ----------------------------
Common Stock, without par value 30,081,175
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
1. Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 1999, to the
extent indicated in Parts I, II, and IV. Except as to information
specifically incorporated, the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders is not to
be deemed filed as part of this Form 10-K Annual Report.
2. Proxy statement filed with the Commission dated March 15, 2000, to the
extent indicated in Part III.
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. Business
Ball Corporation is an Indiana corporation organized in 1880 and incorporated in
Indiana in 1922. Its principal executive offices are located at 10 Longs Peak
Drive, Broomfield, Colorado 80021-2510. The terms "Ball" and the "Company" as
used herein refer to Ball Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Ball is a manufacturer of metal and plastic packaging, primarily for beverages
and foods, and a supplier of aerospace and other technologies and services to
commercial and governmental customers.
The following sections of the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders contain
financial and other information concerning Company business developments and
operations, and are incorporated herein by reference: the notes to the financial
statements "Business Segment Information (note 2)," "Headquarters Relocation,
Plant Closures, Dispositions and Other Costs (note 4)," "Acquisitions (note 3)"
and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."
Recent Business Developments
Ball and ConAgra Grocery Products Company (ConAgra), a unit of ConAgra, Inc.,
announced in February 2000 their agreement to form a joint venture company
called Ball Western Can Company (Ball Western) to acquire and operate certain
ConAgra can manufacturing assets in California. Under a separate agreement, Ball
will purchase certain ConAgra manufacturing assets and relocate them to an
existing Ball plant in Tennessee. Ball Western and Ball will supply metal food
cans and ends under long-term agreements to ConAgra, whose requirements are
currently about one billion cans and ends per year.
Other Information Pertaining to the Business of the Company
The Company's businesses are comprised of two segments: (1) packaging and
(2) aerospace and technologies.
Packaging Segment
Ball's principal business is the manufacture and sale of rigid packaging
products, primarily for beverages and foods. Packaging products are sold in
highly competitive markets, primarily based on quality, service and price. A
substantial part of the Company's packaging sales is made directly to relatively
few major companies in packaged beverage and food businesses. Packaging segment
sales to Miller Brewing Company, PepsiCo, Inc., and affiliates, and Coca-Cola
and affiliates, represented approximately 15 percent, 13 percent and 11 percent,
respectively, of consolidated 1999 net sales. Worldwide sales to all bottlers of
Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola branded beverages, including licensees utilizing
consolidated purchasing groups, comprised approximately 35 percent of
consolidated net sales in 1999.
The rigid packaging business is capital intensive, requiring significant
investments in machinery and equipment. Profitability is sensitive to production
volumes, labor and the costs of certain raw materials, such as aluminum, steel
and plastic resin.
Raw materials used in the Company's packaging business are generally available
from several sources. Ball has secured what it considers to be adequate supplies
of raw materials and is not experiencing any shortages. The Company's
manufacturing facilities are dependent, in varying degrees, upon the
availability of process energy, such as natural gas and electricity. While
certain of these energy sources may become increasingly in short supply or
halted due to external factors, including potential Year 2000 noncompliance by
suppliers, the Company cannot predict the effects, if any, of such occurrences
on its future operations.
Research and development efforts in this business generally seek to improve
manufacturing efficiencies and lower unit costs, principally raw material costs,
by reducing the material content of containers while improving or maintaining
other physical properties such as material strength. In addition, research and
development efforts are directed toward the development of new sizes and types
of metal and plastic beverage and food containers, as well as new uses for the
current containers.
On August 10, 1998, Ball acquired substantially all the assets and assumed
certain liabilities of the North American beverage can manufacturing business of
Reynolds Metals Company (Acquisition). Subsequently, the Company closed two of
the acquired plants in early 1999 and a third one in early 2000. With the
Acquisition, Ball expanded its metal beverage product line to include specialty
cans and became the largest metal beverage can producer in North America with an
annual production capacity of approximately 36 billion cans.
Metal beverage containers and ends represent Ball's largest product line,
accounting for approximately 63 percent of 1999 consolidated net sales.
Decorated two-piece aluminum beverage cans are currently being produced at
18 manufacturing facilities in the U.S., 2 facilities in Canada and 1 in Puerto
Rico; ends are produced within 5 U.S. facilities. Metal beverage containers are
sold primarily to fillers of carbonated soft drinks, beer and other beverages
under annual or long-term supply contracts. Sales volumes of metal beverage cans
and ends in North America tend to be highest during the period from April
through September.
Based on publicly available industry information, the Company estimates that its
North American metal beverage container shipments were approximately 35 percent
of total U.S. and Canadian shipments for metal beverage containers. The Company
also estimates that its three largest competitors together represent
substantially all of the remaining market shipments.
Also based on publicly available industry information, the U.S. metal beverage
container industry experienced demand growth at an average annual rate of
approximately 1 percent since 1990. During this same period, the soft drink
portion of the industry added over 15 billion units while the beer portion of
the industry lost approximately 6 billion units (largely to glass packaging).
The growth in industry-wide shipments was relatively flat from 1998 to 1999, but
increased approximately 2.2 percent from 1997 to 1998.
In Canada, metal beverage containers have captured significantly lower
percentages of the packaged beverage industry than in the U.S., particularly in
the packaged beer industry, in which the market share of metal containers has
been hindered by trade barriers and restrictive taxes within Canada.
Beverage container industry production capacity in the U.S. and Canada exceeds
demand. In order to balance more closely capacity and demand within its own
business, Ball has consolidated its can and end manufacturing capacity into
fewer, more efficient facilities with the closure of two of the acquired plants
in early 1999 and a third one in early 2000.
The aluminum beverage can continues to compete aggressively with other packaging
materials in the beer and soft drink industries. The glass bottle has shown
resilience in the packaged beer industry, while the soft drink industry use of
the PET bottle has grown. The packaged beer industry has also begun the usage of
plastic beer bottles utilizing multi-layer technology.
Two-piece and three-piece steel food containers are manufactured in the U.S. and
Canada and sold primarily to food processors in the Midwestern United States and
Canada. In 1999 metal food container sales comprised approximately 14 percent of
consolidated net sales. Sales volumes of metal food containers in North America
tend to be highest from June through October as a result of seasonal vegetable
and salmon packs.
In the metal food container industry, manufacturing capacity in North America
exceeds market demand. Approximately 34 billion steel food cans were shipped in
the U.S. and Canada in 1999, of which approximately 16 percent were shipped by
Ball.
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packaging is Ball's newest product line,
representing slightly less than 7 percent of consolidated net sales in 1999.
Demand for containers made of PET has increased in the beverage packaging
industry and is expected to increase in the food packaging industry with
improved technology and adequate supplies of PET resin. While PET beverage
containers compete against both metal and glass, the historical increase in the
sales of PET containers has come primarily at the expense of glass containers
and through new market introductions. The latest projections publicly available
indicate that the growth in overall PET demand over the next two years is
expected to be between 5 and 10 percent.
Competition in this industry includes two national suppliers and several
regional suppliers and self-manufacturers. Service, quality and price are
deciding competitive factors. Increasingly, the ability to produce customized,
differentiated plastic containers is an important competitive factor.
Ball has secured long-term customer supply agreements, principally for
carbonated beverage and water containers. The Company is also developing plastic
beer bottles using a multi-layer technology and is introducing this beverage
container in limited markets. Other products such as juice containers are
potential candidates for expanding the plastics product line.
As part of Ball's initiative to expand its presence internationally, in early
1997 the Company acquired a controlling interest in Ball Asia Pacific Limited,
formerly M.C. Packaging (Hong Kong) Limited. Ball Asia Pacific Limited produces
two-piece aluminum beverage containers, three-piece steel beverage and food
containers, aerosol cans, plastic packaging, metal crowns and printed and coated
metal.
With the acquisition of Ball Asia Pacific Limited, the Company is the largest
beverage can manufacturer in the People's Republic of China (PRC), supplying
approximately half of the two-piece aluminum beverage cans used in the PRC.
Capacity has grown rapidly in the PRC, resulting in a supply/demand imbalance.
Additionally, uncertainty in the Asian financial markets has resulted in a
decrease in exports of Company products from the PRC to other Asian countries.
As per capita consumption in the PRC is significantly lower than in more
developed countries and per capita income in the PRC is rising, there is
significant potential for strong demand growth. In the interim, however, Ball
elected to delay the start-up of two small facilities originally expected to
become operational in 1998 and to close, in the early part of 1999, two of its
plants located in the PRC and remove from service certain manufacturing
equipment at a third plant.
<PAGE>
Ball operates more than 20 manufacturing ventures in the PRC. The Beijing
manufacturing facility is one of the most technologically advanced plants in the
PRC. The Company's 34 percent-owned affiliate, Sanshui Jianlibao FTB Packaging
Limited, is the largest can manufacturing facility in the PRC in terms of
production capacity. For more information on operations in the PRC, see Item 2,
Properties, and Exhibit 21.1, Subsidiary List.
Ball is a 50 percent equity owner of a joint venture with BBM Participacoes S.A.
to produce two-piece aluminum cans and ends in Brazil. Ball also participates in
joint ventures in Thailand, Russia, Taiwan and the Philippines, in addition to
providing manufacturing technology and assistance to numerous can manufacturers
around the world.
Aerospace and Technologies Segment
The aerospace and technologies segment includes civil space systems, defense
systems, commercial space operations, commercial products and technologies,
systems engineering services, advanced antenna and video systems and engineering
technology products. Sales in the aerospace and technologies segment accounted
for approximately 11 percent of consolidated net sales in 1999.
The majority of the aerospace and technologies segment business involves work
under relatively short-term contracts (generally one to five years) for the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the U.S. Department of
Defense (DoD) and foreign governments. Contracts funded by the various agencies
of the federal government represented approximately 86 percent of segment sales
in 1999. Major industry trends have not changed significantly, with Department
of Defense and NASA budgets remaining relatively flat. However, there is a
growing worldwide demand for commercial space activities. Consolidation in the
industry continues, and there is strong competition for business.
Civil space and defense systems and commercial space operations include
hardware, software and services to both U.S. and international customers, with
emphases on space science, environment and Earth sciences, defense and
intelligence, manned missions and exploration. Also included are the design,
manufacture and testing of satellites, ground systems and payloads (including
launch vehicle integration), as well as satellite ground station control
hardware and software.
Other hardware activities include: electro-optics products for spacecraft
guidance; control instruments and sensors and defense subsystems for
surveillance; warning, target identification and attitude control; cryogenic
systems for reactant storage; sensor cooling devices such as closed-cycle
mechanical refrigerators and open-cycle solid and liquid cryogens; star
trackers, which are general-purpose stellar attitude sensors; and fast-steering
mirrors.
Additionally, the aerospace and technologies segment provides diversified
technical services and products to federal and local government agencies, prime
contractors and commercial organizations for a broad range of information
warfare, electronic warfare, avionics, intelligence, training and space systems
problems.
Highlights for 1999 included the launch of the QuikSCAT commercial satellite bus
which was developed to measure wind speeds and was delivered in record time.
This was the first of Ball's growing commercial spacecraft bus product line. The
aerospace and technologies segment also had a major role in the Chandra X-Ray
Observatory mission, launched in July and the third of NASA's Great
Observatories. Ball built the aspect camera and the science instrument module
for Chandra. Other notable highlights included being awarded (1) the Deep Impact
contract, the largest NASA contract the Company had ever received, (2) Ball's
first spacecraft contract to build a platform that will leave Earth's orbit to
travel to another planet and (3) a contract to build two spacecraft that will
fly in formation to obtain high resolution interferometry images.
Additional highlights included the product launch of a security camera which
enables aircraft owners, flight crew and airport security personnel to monitor
activity around the aircraft under a broad range of light conditions. Ball's
wireless communication products business expanded its product and customer base
with standard and custom antennas for wireless base stations, wireless local
loop and mobile satellite tracking services. A contract to build pointing and
tracking subsystems for two laser communication terminals extended Ball's entry
into the laser communication technology arena.
Backlog
Backlog of the aerospace and technologies segment was approximately $346 million
at December 31, 1999, and $296 million at December 31, 1998, and consists of the
aggregate contract value of firm orders, excluding amounts previously recognized
as revenue. The 1999 backlog includes approximately $266 million which is
expected to be billed during 2000, with the remainder expected to be billed
thereafter. Unfunded amounts included in backlog for certain firm government
orders which are subject to annual funding were approximately $200 million at
December 31, 1999. Year-to-year comparisons of backlog are not necessarily
indicative of the trend of future operations.
<PAGE>
The Company's aerospace and technologies segment has contracts with the U.S.
government which have standard termination provisions. The government retains
the right to terminate contracts at its convenience. However, if contracts are
terminated, Ball is entitled to be reimbursed for allowable costs and profits to
the date of termination relating to authorized work performed to such date. U.S.
government contracts are also subject to reduction or modification in the event
of changes in government requirements or budgetary constraints.
Patents
In the opinion of the Company, none of its active patents is essential to the
successful operation of its business as a whole.
Research and Development
The "Research and Development" note in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders
contains information on Company research and development activity and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Environment
Aluminum, steel and PET containers are recyclable, and significant amounts of
used containers are being recycled and diverted from the solid waste stream.
Using the most recent data available, in 1998 approximately 63 percent of
aluminum containers and 56 percent of steel cans sold in the U.S. were recycled.
In 1999 approximately 22 percent of the PET containers sold in the U.S. were
recycled.
Compliance with federal, state and local laws relating to protection of the
environment has not had a material, adverse effect upon capital expenditures,
earnings or competitive position of the Company. As more fully described under
Item 3, Legal Proceedings, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and various
state environmental agencies have designated the Company as a potentially
responsible party, along with numerous other companies, for the cleanup of
several hazardous waste sites. However, the Company's information at this time
does not indicate that these matters will have a material, adverse effect upon
the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
Legislation which would prohibit, tax or restrict the sale or use of certain
types of containers, and would require diversion of solid wastes such as
packaging materials from disposal in landfills, has been or may be introduced in
the U.S. Congress and the Canadian Parliament, in state and Canadian provincial
legislatures and other legislative bodies. While container legislation has been
adopted in a few jurisdictions, similar legislation has been defeated in public
referenda in several other states, in local elections and in many state and
local legislative sessions. The Company anticipates that continuing efforts will
be made to consider and adopt such legislation in many jurisdictions in the
future. If such legislation was widely adopted, it could have a material adverse
effect on the business of the Company, as well as on the container manufacturing
industry generally, in view of the Company's substantial North American sales
and investment in metal and PET container manufacture.
Employees
At the end of February 2000, the Company employed approximately 11,850 people
worldwide.
Item 2. Properties
The Company's properties described below are well maintained, are considered
adequate and are being utilized for their intended purposes.
The Corporate headquarters is located in Broomfield, Colorado. The offices for
metal packaging operations are in Westminster, Colorado. Also located in
Westminster is the Edmund F. Ball Technical Center, which serves as a research
and development facility, primarily for the metal packaging operations. The
offices, pilot line and research and development center for the plastic
container business are located in Smyrna, Georgia.
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. offices are located in Boulder, Colorado.
The Colorado-based operations of this business occupy a variety of Company-owned
and leased facilities in Boulder, Broomfield and Westminster, which together
aggregate approximately 1,300,000 square feet of office, laboratory, research
and development, engineering and test, and manufacturing space. Other aerospace
and technologies operations include facilities in California, Georgia, New
Mexico, Ohio, Texas and Virginia.
Information regarding the approximate size of the manufacturing locations for
significant packaging operations which are owned by the Company, except where
indicated otherwise, follows. Facilities in the process of being shut down have
been excluded from the list. Where certain locations include multiple
facilities, the total approximate size for the location is noted. In addition to
the manufacturing facilities, the Company leases warehousing space.
<PAGE>
Approximate
Floor Space in
Plant Location Square Feet
Metal packaging manufacturing facilities:
North America
Blytheville, Arkansas (leased) 29,000
Springdale, Arkansas 286,000
Richmond, British Columbia 194,000
Fairfield, California 340,000
Torrance, California 265,000
Golden, Colorado 500,000
Tampa, Florida 275,000
Moultrie, Georgia 152,000
Kapolei, Hawaii 132,000
Monticello, Indiana 356,000
Kansas City, Missouri 225,000
Saratoga Springs, New York 153,000
Wallkill, New York 314,000
Reidsville, North Carolina 287,000
Salisbury, North Carolina 162,000
Columbus, Ohio 167,000
Findlay, Ohio 733,000
Burlington, Ontario 308,000
Hamilton, Ontario 360,000
Whitby, Ontario 200,000
Guayama, Puerto Rico 225,000
Baie d'Urfe, Quebec 211,000
Chestnut Hill, Tennessee 300,000
Conroe, Texas 180,000
Fort Worth, Texas 161,000
Bristol, Virginia 241,000
Williamsburg, Virginia 400,000
Seattle, Washington 166,000
Weirton, West Virginia (leased) 85,000
DeForest, Wisconsin 45,000
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 161,000
Asia
Beijing, PRC 272,000
E-zhou, Hubei (Wuhan), PRC 193,000
Hong Kong, PRC 235,000
Panyu, PRC 207,000
Shenzhen, PRC 271,000
Tianjin, PRC 318,000
Xi'an, PRC 251,000
Zhuhai, PRC 180,000
<PAGE>
Approximate
Floor Space in
Plant Location Square Feet
Plastic packaging manufacturing facilities:
North America
Chino, California (leased) 240,000
Ames, Iowa (leased) 250,000
Delran, New Jersey (leased) 450,000
Baldwinsville, New York (leased) 240,000
Asia
Taicang, Jiangsu, PRC (leased) 112,000
Tianjin, PRC 62,000
Tianjin, PRC (leased) 5,000
In addition to the consolidated manufacturing facilities, the Company has
ownership interests of 50 percent or less in packaging affiliates located in the
PRC, Brazil, Thailand, Taiwan and the Philippines.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
As previously reported, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers
the Company to be a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) with respect to the
Lowry Landfill site located east of Denver, Colorado. On June 12, 1992, the
Company was served with a lawsuit filed by the City and County of Denver
(Denver) and Waste Management of Colorado, Inc., seeking contribution from the
Company and approximately 38 other companies. The Company filed its answer
denying the allegations of the Complaint. On July 8, 1992, the Company was
served with a third-party complaint filed by S.W. Shattuck Chemical Company,
Inc., seeking contribution from the Company and other companies for the costs
associated with cleaning up the Lowry Landfill. The Company denied the
allegations of the complaint.
In July 1992 the Company entered into a settlement and indemnification agreement
with Denver, Chemical Waste Management, Inc., and Waste Management of Colorado,
Inc. (collectively Waste) pursuant to which Denver and Waste dismissed their
lawsuit against the Company and Waste agreed to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the Company from claims and lawsuits brought by governmental agencies
and other parties relating to actions seeking contributions or remedial costs
from the Company for the cleanup of the site. Several other companies which are
defendants in the above-referenced lawsuits had already entered into the
settlement and indemnification agreement with Denver and Waste. Waste
Management, Inc., has agreed to guarantee the obligations for Chemical Waste
Management, Inc., and Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. Denver and Waste may
seek additional payments from the Company if the response costs related to the
site exceed $319 million. The Company might also be responsible for payments
(calculated in 1992 dollars) for any additional wastes which may have been
disposed of by the Company at the site but which are identified after the
execution of the settlement agreement.
At this time, there are no Lowry Landfill actions in which the Company is
actively involved. Based on the information available to the Company at the
present time, the Company believes that this matter will not have a material
adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition
of the Company.
As previously reported, the Company has been notified by Chrysler Corporation
(Chrysler) that Chrysler, Ford Motor Company (Ford), and General Motors
Corporation have been named in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in
Reno, Nevada, by Jerome Lemelson, alleging infringement of three of his vision
inspection system patents used by defendants. One or more of the vision
inspection systems used by the defendants may have been supplied by the
Company's former Industrial Systems Division (Division) or its predecessors. The
suit sought injunctive relief and unspecified damages. Chrysler notified the
Company that the Division may have indemnification responsibilities to Chrysler.
The Company responded to Chrysler that it appeared at that time that the systems
sold to Chrysler by the Company either were not covered by the identified
patents or were sold to Chrysler before the patents were issued. On June 16,
1995, the Magistrate of the U.S. District Court declared the patents of Lemelson
unenforceable because of the long delays in prosecution. On April 28, 1997, the
U.S. District Court Judge vacated the report and recommendation of the U.S.
Magistrate. On August 20, 1997, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit denied Ford's petition for permission to appeal. The Company believes
that the issues in this case have been settled and that this case is now
concluded. In addition, under an agreement in connection with the spin-off of
Alltrista Corporation from Ball in 1993, Alltrista has agreed to indemnify Ball
for liabilities arising from this matter. Based on this information, the Company
believes that this case and the Company's alleged indirect involvement as a
machine vision inspection system supplier to Chrysler will not have a material
adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition
of the Company and that this matter is now concluded.
The Company previously reported that on or about March 19, 1999, the Lemelson
Medical, Education and Research Foundation, Limited Partnership (Lemelson), gave
notice to the Company that the Company allegedly infringed certain patents owned
by that entity which were alleged to cover machine vision and automatic
identification equipment. Lemelson alleged that the patented machine vision
methods cover production, inspection and production control operations,
including inspection for flaws or defects in conformance with specifications and
standards. Automatic identification allegedly covers bar code recognition.
Lemelson claims that it also has patents pending that broadly cover something
referred to as flexible manufacturing. Lemelson offered the Company a license
under all patents, and patents pending, owned or controlled by Lemelson with
certain irrelevant exceptions. Pursuant to a confidential license agreement,
this matter has now been concluded. The Company believes that this matter has
been concluded without any material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of
operations or financial condition of the Company.
As previously reported, on April 24, 1992, the Company was notified by the
Muncie Race Track Steering Committee (Steering Committee) that the Company,
through its former Consumer Products Division and former Zinc Products Division,
may be a PRP with respect to waste disposal at the Muncie Race Track Site
located in Delaware County, Indiana. The Steering Committee alleges that the
Company was a contributor to the site. The Steering Committee requested that the
Company pay 2 percent of the cleanup costs which are estimated at this time to
be $10 million. The Company declined to participate in the PRP group because the
Company's records do not indicate the Company contributed hazardous waste to the
site. Based upon the information available to the Company at this time, the
Company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect
upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
As previously reported, on August 1, 1997, the EPA sent notice of potential
liability letters to 19 owners, operators, and waste generators concerning past
activities at one or more of the four Rocky Flats parcels at the Rocky Flats
Industrial Park site located in Jefferson County, Colorado. Based upon sampling
at the site in 1996, the EPA determined that additional site work would be
required to determine the extent of contamination and the possible cleanup of
the site. The EPA requested the letter recipients conduct an engineering
evaluation and cost analysis (EE/CA) of the site. Fourteen companies, including
the Company, have agreed to undertake the study. The EPA is also seeking
reimbursement for approximately $1.5 million which it has spent at the site. On
December 19, 1997, the EPA issued an Administrative Order to conduct the EE/CA
to 18 owners, operators, and generators associated with the site. The EPA
alleges that the Company is the ninth largest generator of the thirteen
generators issued Administrative Orders. The PRP group has undertaken the EE/CA
at a cost of about $850,000, of which the Company has paid approximately
$70,000. Based upon the information available to the Company at this time, the
Company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect
upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
As previously reported, the Company was notified on June 19, 1989, that the EPA
has designated the Company and numerous other companies as PRPs responsible for
the cleanup of certain hazardous wastes that were released at the Spectron,
Inc., site located in Elkton, Maryland. In December 1989 the Company, along with
other companies whose alleged hazardous waste contributions to the Spectron,
Inc., site were considered to be de minimis, entered into a settlement agreement
with the EPA for cleanup costs incurred in connection with the removal action of
aboveground site areas. By a letter dated September 29, 1995, the Company, along
with other above-described PRPs, was notified by the EPA that it was negotiating
with the large-volume PRPs another consent order for performance of a site
environmental study as a prerequisite to long-term remediation. The EPA and the
large-volume PRPs have stated that a second de minimis buyout for settlement of
liability for performance of all environmental studies and site remediation is
being formulated and an offer to participate therein has been made to the
Company. The Company has joined with a group of de minimis PRPs to negotiate a
reduction (i.e., a lower price per gallon assessment) in the proposed de minimis
settlement offer. The Company's information at this time does not indicate that
this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of
operations or financial condition of the Company.
As previously reported, the Company was named a PRP with respect to the Solvents
Recovery Site located in Southington, Connecticut. According to the information
received by the Company, it is alleged that the Company contributed
approximately .08816 percent of the waste contributed to the site on a
volumetric basis. The Company responded and has investigated the accuracy of the
total volume alleged to be attributable to the Company. The Company joined the
PRP group during 1993. In February 1995 the Company executed a trust agreement
whereby certain contributions will be made to fund the administration of an
ongoing work group. The group members finalized an Administrative Order on
Consent for Removal Action and Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study on
February 6, 1997, pursuant to which the group members will perform a removal
action and completion of a remedial investigation and feasibility study in
connection with the site. Based upon the information available to the Company at
this time, the Company does not believe that this matter will have a material
adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition
of the Company.
As previously reported, on or about June 14, 1990, the El Monte plant of
Ball-InCon Glass Packaging Corp., a then wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
[renamed Ball Glass Container Corporation (Ball Glass)], the assets of which
were contributed in September 1995 into a joint venture with Compagnie de
Saint-Gobain (Saint-Gobain), now known as Ball-Foster Glass Container Co.,
L.L.C., and wholly owned by Saint Gobain, received a general notification letter
and information request from the EPA, Region IX, notifying Ball Glass that it
may have a potential liability as defined in Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) with respect to
the San Gabriel Valley areas 1-4 Superfund Sites located in Los Angeles County,
California. The EPA requested certain information from Ball Glass, and Ball
Glass responded. The Company received notice from the City of El Monte that,
pursuant to a proposed city economic redevelopment plan, the City proposed to
commence groundwater cleanup by a pump and treat remediation process. As of
March 1, 2000, the City has not commenced this remediation. A PRP group
organized and drafted a PRP group agreement, which Ball Glass executed. The PRP
group retained an environmental engineering firm to critique the EPA studies and
any proposed remediation.
The PRP group completed negotiations with the EPA over the terms of the
administrative consent order, statement of work for the remedial investigation
phase of the cleanup, and the interim allocation arrangement between PRP group
members to fund the remedial investigation. The interim allocation approach
requires that any payment will be based upon contribution to pollution. Ball's
interim allocation is 5.79 percent. The administrative consent order was
executed by the PRP group and the EPA. The EPA also accepted the statement of
work for the remedial investigation phase of the cleanup. The PRP group retained
an environmental engineering consulting firm to perform the remedial
investigation. As required under the administrative consent order, the group
submitted to the EPA copies of all environmental studies conducted at the plant,
the majority of which had already been furnished to the State of California. The
EPA then approved the work plan, project management plan, and the data
management plan portions of the PRP group's proposed remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS). The group funded the RI/FS. The
environmental consulting firm retained by the PRP group submitted to the EPA its
Feasibility Study Technical Memorandum 1 concerning the site. Five potential
remedial action plans were identified in the study, ranging from no action to an
extensive groundwater remediation project for both shallow and deep aquifers.
The costs of such remedies range from minimal costs for no action to between
$10.5 to $25 million for the three groundwater pump and treat options proposed.
The PRP group is negotiating with the EPA over the remedy selections for the
Record of Decision and has formed an allocation committee for making final
allocation of remediation costs between group members. The EPA has informally
told the PRP group that it will likely choose the most extensive of the proposed
remedies for incorporation into the Record of Decision. The PRP group believes
the selection of such a remedy is premature in that the PRP group is still
evaluating additional remedial options. The PRP group has commenced the final
allocation process. The Allocation Committee has been assigned such task and
continues the development of the method for final allocation of costs among PRP
group members. Although final allocation has not been made, the Allocation
Committee will allocate costs so that PRP group members responsible for the
majority of the contamination will pay a higher percentage of the cleanup costs
required by the Record of Decision, once it is finalized and issued. Since final
costs will be allocated under such method, Ball Glass decided to perform soil
vapor analysis testing to compliment its soil and groundwater sampling analyses
previously conducted. Soil vapor analysis was conducted during the week of
October 25, 1999. In a significant positive development, the results of all
44 vapor probe locations were non-detect for concern constituents sampled (i.e.,
those pollutants present in the area groundwater). On November 11, 1999, Ball
Glass informed the PRP group of these results which should reduce Ball Glass'
final cost allocation under such allocation method. On March 14, 2000, Ball
Glass made a formal presentation to the Allocation Committee and requested,
based upon its analytical data described above, that its final allocation be
reduced from the 5.79 percent interim allocation percentage. In addition,
Commercial Union, the Corporation's general liability insurer, is defending this
governmental action and is paying the cost of defense including attorneys' fees.
Based on the information, or lack thereof, available to the Company at the
present time, the Company is unable to express an opinion as to the actual
exposure of the Company; however, the Company does not believe that this matter
will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or
financial condition of the Company.
As previously reported, in March of 1992, William Hallahan, an employee at the
Company's metal beverage container plant in Saratoga Springs, New York, filed a
workers' compensation claim alleging that he suffers from a form of leukemia
that was caused by his exposure to certain chemicals used in the plant. The
Company denied the charge, and hearings on the matter were held before the
Workers' Compensation Board of the State of New York. The testimony was
concluded in April 1996. On January 14, 1997, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
filed his Memorandum of Decision finding in favor of the claimant. The decision
was appealed, and the Workers' Compensation Board remanded the case back to the
ALJ for further findings. The ALJ entered a decision against the Company on
January 8, 1998, as corrected on February 2, 1998, and February 4, 1998. The
Company appealed all of the decisions to the Appeals Bureau of the Workers'
Compensation Board on February 6, 1998. In June 1999 a three-judge panel of the
Workers' Compensation Board reversed the decision of the ALJ and found that
substantial evidence does not show a causal relationship between the claimant's
workplace and his disease in order to support a causal link and conclude that he
developed an occupational disease. The Board then closed the case. The claimant
has appealed the case to the full Workers' Compensation Board and alternatively
to the Appellate Division of the New York State judicial system. Both parties
have filed briefs with the full Workers' Compensation Board. Based on the
information, or lack thereof, available to the Company at the present time, the
Company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect
upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
As previously reported, on or about December 31, 1992, William Hallahan and his
wife filed suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of
Saratoga, against certain manufacturers of solvents, coatings and equipment,
including Somerset Technologies Inc. and Belvac Production Machinery, seeking
damages in the amount of $15 million for allegedly causing leukemia by exposing
him to harmful toxins. Somerset and Belvac filed third-party complaints seeking
contribution from the Company for damages that they might be required to pay
William Hallahan. Based upon information available to the Company at this time,
the Company believes that this matter will not have a material adverse effect
upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
<PAGE>
As previously reported, on January 5, 1996, an individual named Tangee E.
Daniels, on behalf of herself and two minor children and four other plaintiffs,
served the Company with a lawsuit filed in the 193rd Judicial District Court of
Dallas County, Texas. The suit alleges that the Company's metal beverage
container operations and over 50 other defendants disposed of certain hazardous
waste at the hazardous waste disposal site operated by Gibraltar Chemical
Resources, Inc., located in Winona, Smith County, Texas. The lawsuit also
alleges that American Ecology Corp., American Ecology Management Corp., Mobley
Environmental Services, Inc., John A. Mobley, James Mobley, Daniel Mobley and
Thomas Mobley were managers for Gibraltar and failed to appropriately manage the
waste disposed of or treated at the Gibraltar site, resulting in release of
hazardous substances into the environment. The plaintiffs allege that they have
been denied the enjoyment of their property and have sustained personal and
bodily injury and damages due to the release of hazardous waste and toxic
substances into the environment caused by all the defendants. The plaintiffs
allege numerous causes of action under state law and common law. Plaintiffs also
seek to recover damages for past, present, and future medical treatment; mental
and emotional anguish and trauma; loss of wages and earning capacity; and
physical impairment, as well as punitive damages and prejudgment interest in
unspecified amounts. On May 4, 1998, the plaintiffs in the Daniels lawsuit filed
for an involuntary dismissal of their complaint without prejudice. Three other
lawsuits have been filed against substantially the same defendants: Williams v.
Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (filed on January 2, 1996, in the District Court of
Smith County, Texas, dismissed but appealed); and Steich v. Akzo et al., (filed
March 4, 1996, in the 241st Judicial District Court of Smith County, Texas,
voluntarily dismissed without prejudice); and Adams v. Akzo et al (filed August
30, 1996, in the 236th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas). The
Company is a party defendant in each lawsuit. The Company has denied the
allegations of each complaint and has been defending each matter. The Company
has settled these cases and believes that these cases are now closed. Based on
the information available to the Company at the present time, the Company
believes that this matter will not have a material adverse effect upon the
liquidity, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
As previously reported, on September 21, 1998, Daiei, Inc. (Daiei), a Japanese
corporation, with its principal place of business in Tokyo, Japan, sued the
Company in U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Evansville
Division. Daiei alleges it is engaged in the retail sale of consumer goods and
food products at stores throughout Japan. Daiei alleges that it purchased
defective beer cans filled with beer from Evansville Brewing Company, Inc. (EBC)
between April 5, 1995, and July 20, 1995. Daiei further alleges that the metal
containers were defectively assembled and sealed by EBC at its production
facility in Evansville, Indiana, upon a machine which was inspected by
representatives of Ball. Daiei further alleges that Ball breached its warranty
to provide metal containers that performed in a commercially reasonable manner,
and that Ball's representatives were negligent in the repair of the sealing
equipment owned by EBC. Daiei seeks damages for the lost containers and product
in the amount of approximately $6 million. The Company has retained counsel and
is defending this case. The parties are engaged in the discovery process, and a
Motion to Dismiss has been filed by the Company on several legal grounds but the
Motion has not been ruled on by the court. Based upon the information available
to the Company at the present time, the Company does not believe that this
matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of
operations or financial condition of the Company.
On January 27, 1999, Plastic Solutions of Texas, Inc. (PST) and Kurt H. Ruppman,
Sr. (Ruppman) filed a Statement of Claim with the American Arbitration
Association alleging the Company breached a contract between the Company and PST
and Ruppman relating to the grant of a license under certain patents and
technology owned by PST and Ruppman relating to the use of cryogenics in the
manufacture of hot fill PET bottles. The Company has denied the allegations of
the complaint. An arbitration hearing commenced on March 7, 2000, and continued
through March 10, 2000, and has been adjourned until April 10, 2000. Based on
the lack of information available to the Company at the present time, the
Company is unable to express an opinion to the actual exposure of the Company;
however, the Company does not believe that this matter will have a material
adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition
of the Company.
In 1998 various consumers filed toxic tort litigation in the Superior Court for
Los Angeles County (Trial Court) against various water companies operating in
the San Gabriel Valley Basin. The water companies petitioned the Trial Court to
remove this action to the California Public Utilities Commission. The Trial
Court agreed. The plaintiffs appealed this decision to the California Court of
Appeals which reversed the Trial Court. One non-regulated utility has appealed
this decision to the California Supreme Court. Pending completion of the
appellate process, the Trial Court stayed further action in this litigation
except that the plaintiffs were permitted to add additional defendants. The
Trial Court consolidated the six separate lawsuits in the Northeast District
(Pasadena) and designated the case of Adler, et al. v. Southern California Water
Company, et al., as the lead case. In late March 1999, Ball-Foster Glass
Container Co., L.L.C., which the Company no longer owns, received a summons and
amended complaint based on its ownership of the El Monte glass plant.
Ball-Foster Glass tendered the lawsuit to the Company for defense and indemnity.
The Company has in turn tendered this lawsuit to its liability carrier,
Commercial Union, for defense and indemnity. Plaintiffs appear to be proceeding
to join all companies which are alleged to be Potentially Responsible Parties in
the various operable units in the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site. Based on
the information, or lack thereof, available to the Company at the present time,
the Company is unable to express an opinion as to the actual exposure of the
Company for this matter; however, based on the information available to the
Company at the present time, the Company does not believe that this matter will
have a material adverse affect upon the liquidity, results of operations or
financial condition of the Company.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth
quarter of 1999.
Part II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder
Matters
Ball Corporation common stock (BLL) is traded on the New York, Chicago and
Pacific Stock Exchanges. There were 6,540 common shareholders of record on
March 3, 2000.
Other information required by Item 5 appears under the caption, "Quarterly Stock
Prices and Dividends," in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The information required by Item 6 for the five years ended December 31, 1999,
appearing in the section titled, "Five-Year Review of Selected Financial Data,"
of the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information required by Item 7A appears under the caption, "Financial and
Derivative Instruments and Risk Management," within the "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section of the
1999 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of the 1999 Annual
Report to Shareholders, together with the report thereon of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, dated January 26, 2000, included in the 1999 Annual
Report to Shareholders, are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
There were no matters required to be reported under this item.
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 1999, were as follows:
1. George A. Sissel, 63, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, since January
1998; Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, 1996-1998; President
and Chief Executive Officer, 1995-1996; Acting President and Chief
Executive Officer, 1994-1995; Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs;
Corporate Secretary and General Counsel, 1993-1995; Senior Vice President,
Corporate Secretary and General Counsel, 1987-1993; Vice President,
Corporate Secretary and General Counsel, 1981-1987.
2. R. David Hoover, 54, Vice Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer
effective January 1, 2000; Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer,
1998-1999; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 1997-1998;
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, 1996-1997;
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 1995-1996; Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 1992-1995; Vice President and
Treasurer, 1988-1992; Assistant Treasurer, 1987-1988; Vice President,
Finance and Administration, Technical Products, 1985-1987; Vice President,
Finance and Administration, Management Services Division, 1983-1985.
3. George A. Matsik, 60, Retired effective December 31, 1999; President, Chief
Operating Officer, Packaging Operations, 1998-1999; Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer, Packaging Operations, 1997-1998;
Chief Operating Officer, Packaging Operations, 1996-1997; President,
International Packaging Operations, 1995-1996.
4. Donald C. Lewis, 57, Vice President and General Counsel, since September
1998; Vice President, Assistant Corporate Secretary and General Counsel,
1997-1998; General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary, 1995-1997;
Associate General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary, 1990-1995;
Associate General Counsel, 1983-1990; Assistant General Counsel, 1980-1983;
Senior Attorney, 1978-1980; General Attorney, 1974-1978.
<PAGE>
5. Albert R. Schlesinger, 58, Vice President and Controller, since January
1987; Assistant Controller, 1976-1986.
6. Raymond J. Seabrook, 48, Senior Vice President, Finance, since April 1998;
Vice President, Planning and Control, 1996-1998; Vice President and
Treasurer, 1992-1996; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Ball Packaging Products Canada, Inc., 1988-1992.
7. Harold L. Sohn, 53, Vice President, Corporate Relations, since March 1993;
Director, Industry Affairs, Packaging Products, 1988-1993.
8. David A. Westerlund, 49, Senior Vice President, Administration, since April
1998; Vice President, Administration, 1997-1998; Vice President, Human
Resources, 1994-1997; Senior Director, Corporate Human Resources, July
1994-December 1994; Vice President, Human Resources and Administration,
Ball Glass Container Corporation, 1988-1994; Vice President, Human
Resources, Ball-InCon Glass Packaging Corp., 1987-1988.
Other information required by Item 10 appearing under the caption, "Director
Nominees and Continuing Directors," on pages 3 through 5 and under the caption,
"Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" on page 15 of the
Company's proxy statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A dated March 15, 2000,
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 appearing under the caption, "Executive
Compensation," on pages 7 through 13 of the Company's proxy statement filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A dated March 15, 2000, is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by Item 12 appearing under the caption, "Voting
Securities and Principal Shareholders," on pages 1 and 2 of the Company's proxy
statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A dated March 15, 2000, is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by Item 13 appearing under the caption, "Ratification
of the Appointment of Independent Accountants, " on page 15 of the Company's
proxy statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A dated March 15, 2000, is
incorporated herein by reference.
Part IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements:
The following documents included in the 1999 Annual Report to
Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8:
Consolidated statements of earnings - Years ended December 31, 1999,
1998 and 1997
Consolidated balance sheets - December 31, 1999 and 1998
Consolidated statements of cash flows - Years ended December 31,
1999, 1998 and 1997
Consolidated statements of shareholders' equity and comprehensive
earnings - Years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997
Notes to consolidated financial statements
Report of independent accountants
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
There were no financial statement schedules required under this item.
(3) Exhibits:
See the Index to Exhibits which appears at the end of this document and
which is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
The registrant did not file or amend reports on Form 8-K during 1999.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BALL CORPORATION
(Registrant)
By: /s/George A. Sissel
------------------------------
George A. Sissel, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2000
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below.
(1) Principal Executive Officer:
/s/George A. Sissel Chairman and Chief Executive
-------------------------------- Officer
George A. Sissel March 30, 2000
(2) Principal Financial Accounting Officer:
/s/R. David Hoover Vice Chairman, President and Chief
-------------------------------- Financial Officer
R. David Hoover March 30, 2000
(3) Controller:
/s/Albert R. Schlesinger Vice President and Controller
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
Albert R. Schlesinger
(4) A Majority of the Board of Directors:
/s/Frank A. Bracken * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
Frank A. Bracken
/s/Howard M. Dean * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
Howard M. Dean
/s/John T. Hackett * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
John T. Hackett
/s/R. David Hoover * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
R. David Hoover
/s/John F. Lehman * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
John F. Lehman
/s/Ruel C. Mercure, Jr. * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
Ruel C. Mercure, Jr.
/s/Jan Nicholson * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
Jan Nicholson
/s/George A. Sissel * Chairman, Chief Executive
-------------------------------- Officer and Director
George A. Sissel March 30, 2000
/s/William P. Stiritz * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
William P. Stiritz
/s/Stuart A. Taylor II * Director
-------------------------------- March 30, 2000
Stuart A. Taylor II
*By George A. Sissel as Attorney-in-Fact pursuant to a Limited Power of Attorney
executed by the directors listed above, which Power of Attorney has been filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
By: /s/George A. Sissel
------------------------------
George A. Sissel
As Attorney-in-Fact
March 30, 2000
<PAGE>
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the year ended December 31, 1999
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
3.i Amended Articles of Incorporation as of November 26, 1990 (filed
by incorporation by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 30, 1990) filed December 13, 1990.
3.ii Bylaws of Ball Corporation as amended September 23, 1998, filed
March 29, 1999.
4.1(a) Senior Note Indenture, dated August 10, 1998, among Ball Corporation,
certain subsidiary guarantors of Ball Corporation and The Bank of New
York, as Senior Note Trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to
the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 10, 1998) filed August 25,
1998.
4.1(b) Senior Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 10, 1998, among Ball
Corporation, Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated, BancAmerica Robertson Stephens, First Chicago
Capital Markets, Inc., and certain subsidiary guarantors of Ball
Corporation (filed by incorporation by reference to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated August 10, 1998) filed August 25, 1998.
4.2(a) Senior Subordinated Note Indenture, dated August 10, 1998, among Ball
Corporation, certain subsidiary guarantors of Ball Corporation and The
Bank of New York, as Senior Subordinated Note Trustee (filed by
incorporation by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated
August 10, 1998) filed August 25, 1998.
4.2(b) Senior Subordinated Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 10,
1998, among Ball Corporation, Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, BancAmerica Robertson Stephens,
First Chicago Capital Markets, Inc., and certain subsidiary guarantors
of Ball Corporation (filed by incorporation by reference to the Current
Report on Form 8-K dated August 10, 1998) filed August 25, 1998.
4.3 Dividend distribution payable to shareholders of record on August 4,
2006, of one preferred stock purchase right for each outstanding share
of common stock under the Rights Agreement dated as of July 24, 1996,
between the Company and The First Chicago Trust Company of New York
(filed by incorporation by reference to the Form 8-A Registration
Statement, No. 1-7349, dated August 1, 1996, and filed August 2, 1996,
and to the Company's Form 8-K Report dated February 13, 1996, and filed
February 14, 1996).
<PAGE>
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
10.1 1980 Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, as amended, 1983
Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (filed by incorporation
by reference to the Form S-8 Registration Statement, No. 2-82925) filed
April 27, 1983.
10.2 1988 Restricted Stock Plan and 1988 Stock Option and Stock Appreciation
Rights Plan (filed by incorporation by reference to the Form S-8
Registration Statement, No. 33-21506) filed April 27, 1988.
10.3 Ball Corporation Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan (filed by
incorporation by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1987) filed March 25, 1988.
10.4 Ball Corporation 1986 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended July 1,
1994 (filed by incorporation by reference to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1994) filed August 17, 1994.
10.5 Ball Corporation 1988 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended July 1,
1994 (filed by incorporation by reference to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1994) filed August 17, 1994.
10.6 Ball Corporation 1989 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended July 1,
1994 (filed by incorporation by reference to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1994) filed August 17, 1994.
10.7 Amended and Restated Form of Severance Benefit Agreement which exists
between the Company and its executive officers, effective as of
August 1, 1994 and as amended on January 24, 1996, (filed by
incorporation by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 22, 1996) filed May 15, 1996.
10.8 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 29, 1989, between Ball
Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A. (filed by incorporation by reference
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2,
1989) filed August 15, 1989.
10.9 Ball Corporation 1986 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as
amended October 27, 1987 (filed by incorporation by reference to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990) filed
April 1, 1991.
10.10 1991 Restricted Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors of Ball
Corporation (filed by incorporation by reference to the Form S-8
Registration Statement, No. 33-40199) filed April 26, 1991.
10.11 Ball Corporation Economic Value Added Incentive Compensation Plan dated
January 1, 1994 (filed by incorporation by reference to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994) filed
March 29, 1995.
<PAGE>
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
10.12 Ball Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (filed by incorporation by
reference to the Form S-8 Registration Statement, No. 333-26361), filed
May 1, 1997.
10.13 Agreement and Plan of Merger among Ball Corporation, Ball Sub Corp. and
Heekin Can, Inc. dated as of December 1, 1992, and as amended as of
December 28, 1992 (filed by incorporation by reference to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4, No. 33-58516) filed February 19,
1993.
10.14 Distribution Agreement between Ball Corporation and Alltrista (filed by
incorporation by reference to the Alltrista Corporation Form 8,
Amendment No. 3 to Form 10, No. 0-21052, dated December 31, 1992) filed
March 17, 1993.
10.15 1993 Stock Option Plan (filed by incorporation by reference to the
Form S-8 Registration Statement, No. 33-61986) filed April 30, 1993.
10.16 Retirement Agreement dated June 17, 1994, between Delmont A. Davis
and Ball Corporation (filed by incorporation by reference to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1994) filed
August 17, 1994.
10.17 Ball-InCon Glass Packaging Corp. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended
July 1, 1994 (filed by incorporation by reference to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1994) filed
August 17, 1994.
10.18 Retention Agreement dated June 22, 1994, between Donovan B. Hicks and
Ball Corporation (filed by incorporation by reference to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1994) filed
August 17, 1994.
10.19 Ball Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed by
incorporation by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended October 2, 1994) filed November 15, 1994.
10.20 Ball Corporation Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan (filed by
incorporation by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 2, 1994) filed November 15, 1994.
10.21 Ball Corporation Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan, dated October 25, 1994,
as amended October 23, 1996 (filed by incorporation by reference to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 1996)
filed November 13, 1996.
10.22a Ball Corporation Merger Related, Special Incentive Plan for Operating
Executives which provides for Stock Option grants in which the five
named executive officers participate and which grants are referred
to in the Executive Compensation section in the Ball Corporation Proxy
Statement dated March 15, 1999. (The form of the option grants was
filed March 29, 1999).
<PAGE>
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
10.22b Ball Corporation Merger Related, Special Incentive Plan for Operating
Executives which provides for Restricted Stock grant in which the five
named executive officers participate and which grants are referred to
in the Executive Compensation section of the Ball Corporation Proxy
Statement dated March 15, 1999. (The form of the restricted grants was
filed March 29, 1999.)
10.22c Ball Corporation Merger Related Special Incentive Plan for Operating
Executives which provides for certain cash incentive payments based
upon the attainment of certain performance criteria. This plan is
referred to in Item 11, the Executive Compensation section of this
Form 10-K. (The form of the plan was filed March 29, 1999.)
10.23 Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 1995, among Foster Ball, L.L.C.
(since renamed Ball-Foster Glass Container Co., L.L.C.), Ball Glass
Container Corporation and Ball Corporation (filed by incorporation by
reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 1995)
filed September 29, 1995.
10.24 Foster Ball, L.L.C. (since renamed Ball-Foster Glass Container Co.,
L.L.C.) Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated
June 26, 1995, among Saint-Gobain Holdings I Corp., BG Holdings I, Inc.
and BG Holdings II, Inc. (filed by incorporation by reference to the
Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 1995) filed
September 29, 1995.
10.25 Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 10, 1998, among Ball Corporation
and its Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. and Reynolds Metals Company
(filed by incorporation by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated August 10, 1998) filed August 25, 1998.
10.26 Part-Time Employment, Retirement and Consulting Services Agreement
between Duane E. Emerson and Ball Corporation dated January 14, 1997
(filed by incorporation by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997) filed March 31, 1998.
10.27 Agreement and General Release between David B. Sheldon and Ball
Corporation dated February 7, 1997 (filed by incorporation by reference
to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997)
filed March 31, 1998.
10.28 Consulting Agreement between The Cygnus Enterprise Development Corp.
(for which Donovan B. Hicks is managing partner) and Ball Corporation
dated January 1, 1997 (filed by incorporation by reference to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997) filed
March 31, 1998.
<PAGE>
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
- ------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
10.29 Form of Severance Agreement (Change of Control Agreement) which exists
between the Company and its executive officers (filed by incorporation
by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1988) filed March 25, 1989.
10.30 Consulting Agreement between George A. Matsik and Ball Corporation
dated October 18, 1999. (Filed herewith.)
11.1 Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share (filed by incorporation
by reference to the notes to the consolidated financial statements,
"Earnings Per Share," in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders).
(Filed herewith.)
12.1 Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
(Filed herewith.)
13.1 Ball Corporation 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders (The Annual Report
to Shareholders, except for those portions thereof incorporated by
reference, is furnished for the information of the Commission and is
not to be deemed filed as part of this Form 10-K.) (Filed herewith.)
18.1 Letter re: Change in Accounting Principles. (Filed by incorporation by
reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended July 2, 1995) filed August 15, 1995.
21.1 List of Subsidiaries of Ball Corporation. (Filed herewith.)
23.1 Consent of Independent Accountants. (Filed herewith.)
24.1 Limited Power of Attorney. (Filed herewith.)
27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the year ended December 31, 1999. (Filed
herewith.)
99.1 Specimen Certificate of Common Stock (filed by incorporation by
reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1979) filed March 24, 1980.
99.2 Cautionary statement for purposes of the "safe harbor" provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended.
(Filed herewith.)
Exhibit 10.30
CONSULTING AGREEMENT
This Consulting Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this 18th day
of October, 1999, by and between George A. Matsik ("Consultant"), having a
current address at 7318 Windsor Drive, Boulder, Colorado 80301, and whose Social
Security Number is ###-##-####, and Ball Corporation ("Ball"), having a current
address at 10 Longs Peak Drive, Broomfield, Colorado 80021-2510.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Consultant is employed by Ball as President and Chief
Operating Officer; and
WHEREAS, Consultant has expertness in the global packaging industry and
business in general and has been intimately involved in all of Ball's businesses
and their objectives and strategies; and
WHEREAS, Consultant has provided Ball with notice of his intent to
terminate his employment by voluntarily retiring on December 31, 1999; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and Ball have entered into this Agreement for the
purpose of facilitating an independent contractor consulting arrangement and
guaranteeing that Consultant will not participate in certain businesses related
to Ball.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the covenants hereinafter contained
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged by Consultant, the parties agree as follows:
1. Consulting Period. Effective upon Consultant's termination of employment,
("Effective Date") he shall become an independent contractor consultant to
Ball. During the period beginning the Effective Date and ending on
December 31, 2002, ("Consulting Period"), Consultant will provide
consulting services as outlined on Attachment A for Ball, its subsidiaries,
affiliates, joint venture companies, operations and divisions. References
to "Ball" shall hereafter include Ball Corporation, its subsidiaries,
affiliates, joint venture companies, operations, divisions and assigns.
During the Consulting Period, Consultant agrees to provide as an
independent contractor and not as an employee of Ball, consulting services
for up to one hundred twenty (120) hours per calendar quarter between the
Effective Date and December 31, 2000, eighty (80) hours per calendar
quarter during 2001 and sixty (60) hours per calendar quarter during 2002
("Anticipated Consulting Hours"). Consultant's consulting services will be
provided upon notice by George A. Sissel, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer or R. David Hoover, Vice Chairman, President and Chief
Financial Officer, or their successor(s). Consultant will be paid
Thirty-seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37,500) per calendar quarter
between the Effective Date and December 31, 2000, Twenty-five Thousand
Dollars ($25,000) per calendar quarter during 2001 and Eighteen Thousand
Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($18,750) per calendar quarter during 2002
payable in arrears beginning on the tenth day of the month following the
end of the first calendar quarter of the consultancy, and on the tenth day
of the month following the end of each calendar quarter thereafter until
the last payment is made on January 10, 2003, ("Fixed Consulting Amount").
If the Consulting Period begins on a day earlier than the first day of
January, 2000, the Fixed Consulting Amount during the calendar quarter
shall be prorated according to the number of days remaining in the calendar
quarter.
In the event Consultant is requested to and agrees to perform services in
excess of the Anticipated Consulting Hours per calendar quarter, Consultant
shall be entitled to Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) per day
or for services of less than a day Three Hundred Twelve Dollars and Fifty
Cents ($312.50) per hour for such services requested and performed each
calendar quarter in excess of the Anticipated Consulting Hours. Services
requested and performed in less than one (1) hour increments shall be
prorated. All of the above variable consulting amounts shall be referred to
as ("Variable Consulting Amount(s)"). Ball shall have the option of either
paying the Variable Consulting Amounts, or reducing the Anticipated
Consulting Hours the Consultant is obligated to perform in any of the
subsequent calendar quarters during the Consulting Period by the same
amount. The reduced required hours shall become the Anticipated Consulting
Hours for such quarter.
For such services requested by Ball in excess of the Anticipated Consulting
Hours per calendar quarter, Consultant shall maintain accurate books and
records of services or work performed. Ball may examine or audit any such
records in determining the accuracy of Consultant's billings for consulting
fees.
Travel time by Consultant at the request of Ball to perform services for
Ball shall be computed as time worked on behalf of Ball up to four (4)
hours for trips within the United States, Canada and Mexico ("North
America") and eight (8) hours for trips outside North America.
<PAGE>
2. Billing. Consultant shall not be required to invoice Ball for the Fixed
Consulting Amount. Consultant shall be required to invoice Ball, for its
approval, for Variable Consulting Amounts and the expenses incurred by
Consultant in the performance of his consulting services generally,
including as appropriate pursuant to Ball's Travel Policy, transportation,
lodging, meals and incidental expenses. Consultant must obtain Ball's
approval before incurring any expenses. Expenses incurred must be supported
by copies of airline tickets, hotel bills and restaurant receipts. Single
items of expense, including taxi fares, of $25 or more, must be supported
by appropriate receipts. Invoices including Variable Consulting Amounts
must include the services performed, including the date and hours worked to
exceed the Anticipated Consulting Hours and reach the amounts due for the
Variable Consulting Amounts. Ball may withhold exercise of its options with
respect to Variable Consulting Amounts, including, but not limited to,
payment of Variable Consulting Amounts, and reimbursement for any expenses
not supported in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. Should
Ball require any of the consulting services be performed at Ball's offices,
Ball will provide office space and secretarial service at no cost to
Consultant.
3. Duties. Consultant shall have a duty of loyalty to Ball. Consultant agrees
to perform his consulting services promptly with care, skill and diligence.
Consultant understands that Ball will be relying upon the accuracy,
competence and completeness of Consultant's services. Without waiving his
rights to enforce the specific provisions of this Agreement, Consultant
shall not disparage or criticize, orally or in writing, Ball, or its
subsidiaries or affiliates, or their officers, directors or employees to
any third party, except and to the extent that his testimony is compelled
by judicial or administrative process. Without waiving its right to enforce
the specific provisions of this Agreement, Ball and its officers and
directors shall not disparage or criticize, orally or in writing,
Consultant to any third party, except and to the extent that their
testimony is compelled by judicial and administrative process.
4. Independent Contractor. During the Consulting Period, Consultant shall
operate as an independent contractor and shall not act or be an agent or
employee of Ball. All of Consultant's activities will be at his own risk
and Consultant shall not be entitled to workers' compensation or similar
benefits or other employee benefit protection provided by Ball. As an
independent contractor Consultant will be solely responsible for
determining the means and methods for providing consulting services
described herein. Consultant will determine the time, the place and the
manner in which to accomplish his services within an overall schedule date
established by Ball. Ball will receive only the results of the consulting
services.
5. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless Ball from any and
all claims, actions, causes of action, suits, judgments, including costs
and attorney's fees, associated with Consultant's failure to comply with
applicable requirements regarding workers' compensation coverage liability
for himself, his employees, his agents or subcontractors or the employees
of his agents or subcontractors. Consultant is not entitled to unemployment
insurance benefits, unless unemployment compensation coverage is provided
by Consultant or by an entity other than Ball. Consultant is solely
responsible for reporting his income and for paying Federal and State
Income Tax and any other applicable tax on any monies paid by Ball to
Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.
6. Participation in Other Businesses. Until December 31, 2002, Consultant
shall not, directly or indirectly, and in any role whatsoever, offer, sell,
advise, or provide any consulting or other services of any type to any
person or entity which Ball deems to be its supplier, competitor or
customer in the packaging businesses. In addition, Consultant shall not,
directly or indirectly, as an employee or otherwise, compete with Ball, in
the manufacture, sale or development of packaging products and services
until December 31, 2002. Packaging businesses and packaging products and
services include, without limitation: rigid food, beer, beverage and still
drink containers, including the ends therefor, such as metal, plastic and
glass containers. In addition to any other remedies Ball may have under
this Agreement, Consultant agrees that: (a) Ball shall have no obligation
to make payments for consulting services if Consultant breaches or violates
or threatens to breach or violate this Section 6 of the Agreement; and
(b) Consultant shall repay to Ball any monies paid under this Agreement
from the time of any breach or violation of this Section 6 of this
Agreement.
7. Nondisclosure of Data. Consultant agrees that, unless he first secures
Ball's written consent, he will keep confidential and will not divulge,
communicate, disclose, copy, destroy or use at any time, any secret or
confidential information or technology (including matters of a technical
nature, such as know-how, formulae, secret processes or machines,
inventions, discoveries, improvements, secret data, and research projects,
and matters of a business nature, such as information about costs, profits,
markets, sales, lists of customers, business objectives and strategies,
including but not limited to strategic and operating plans, possible or
consummated acquisitions, divestitures, strategic alliances and joint
ventures, and any other information of a similar nature to the extent not
available to the public) of Ball or third parties to whom Ball has
obligations of confidence of which he became informed during, or as a
result of, his employment or consulting with Ball. Consultant further
agrees to abide by the terms of the Employee Proprietary Information
Agreements executed by him periodically as part of his employment and
recertified in 1998.
8. Return of Materials. Consultant agrees to return to Ball upon request, but
in any event no later than termination of Consultant's consulting services,
any: secret or confidential information referred to in 7 above; manuals;
documents; drawings; equipment; vendor, customer or other third party
materials, computerized or hard copy files; computer hardware and software;
identification cards; credit cards; keys and other Ball property.
9. Ownership of Work. Ball shall own any concept, product or process,
patentable or otherwise, furnished to Ball by Consultant, or otherwise
conceived or developed by Consultant arising out of the performance of this
Agreement. Consultant agrees to do all things necessary, at Ball's request
and at its sole cost and expense, to obtain patents or copyrights on any
processes, products or writings conceived, developed or produced by
Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. All materials prepared or
developed by Consultant hereunder, including without limitation: documents;
calculations; sketches; notes; reports; data; models; and samples, shall
become the property of Ball when prepared, whether delivered to Ball or not
and shall be delivered to Ball upon request and, in any event, upon
termination of Consultant's consulting services.
10. No Employment Solicitation. Until December 31, 2002, Consultant shall not,
directly or indirectly, solicit, persuade or advise (or authorize or assist
others in the taking of such actions) any employee of Ball to leave the
employ of Ball.
11. Injunctive and Other Relief. Consultant acknowledges that the businesses in
which Ball is engaged are intensively competitive and Consultant has had
access to and knowledge of highly confidential information of Ball which if
disclosed or used to the detriment of Ball would cause damage to Ball that
could not be adequately compensated in damages. Consultant acknowledges and
agrees that Ball could suffer irreparable injury in the event of a breach
or violation of the provisions set forth in Sections 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 of
this Agreement and Consultant agrees that, in the event of an actual or
threatened breach or violation of any of these Sections of the Agreement,
Ball may be awarded injunctive relief in a court of appropriate
jurisdiction to prohibit and remedy any such violation, breach or
threatened violation or breach, without the necessity of posting any bond
or security. Any such right to injunctive relief may be in addition to any
other right or remedy available to Ball.
Consultant further acknowledges and agrees that Ball will also be entitled
to monetary relief for such breach or violation of this Agreement
including, but not be limited to, any profit or other economic benefit
received by Consultant in connection with such breach or violation and any
damages incurred by Ball as a result of such breach or violation prior to
or after the entry of injunctive relief.
Consultant agrees if Ball seeks injunctive or other relief in the event of
an actual or threatened breach or violation of Sections 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 of
this Agreement, jurisdiction and venue for such an action is proper in the
District Court in and for the County of Jefferson in the State of Colorado,
regardless of Consultant's residence at the time of filing of the action.
12. Assignment. This Agreement and the obligations under it may not be assigned
or delegated by Consultant without Ball's written permission. This
Agreement and the obligations under it may be assigned by Ball. In the
event Consultant shall become unable to perform the services agreed to be
rendered under this Agreement because of Consultant's illness, incapacity
or death, Ball's obligations to make payments provided under Section 1
above shall terminate as of that time.
13. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Colorado, without reference to principles of conflicts
of laws.
14. Severability and Entire Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement shall
be severable, and the invalidity of any provision shall not affect the
validity of the other provisions, provided, however, in the event
Consultant questions the validity or attempts to set aside Section 6 of
this Agreement, or restrict Section 6 of this Agreement in a way which is
unacceptable to Ball, the obligation of Ball to pay the Fixed Consulting
Amount shall, at the option of Ball, cease and Ball shall have no further
obligation to pay the Fixed Consulting Amounts. Additionally, if any one of
the provisions of this Agreement is held to be excessively broad as to
duration, scope, activity or subject, such provisions shall be construed by
a court by limiting and reducing them so as to be enforceable to the
maximum extent allowable by applicable law. This Agreement states the
entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.
15. Modifications In Writing. This Agreement may only be modified in writing
and supersedes any and all prior oral or written communications. Any waiver
by Ball of nonperformance or noncompliance on the part of Consultant of any
term or condition of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing
waiver of such term or condition or any other term or condition of this
Agreement.
16. Titles. The titles to sections of this Agreement are provided for
convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.
17. Termination. Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14 of this Agreement
shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason.
GEORGE A. MATSIK BALL CORPORATION
/s/ George A. Matsik By: /s/ David A. Westerlund
- -------------------------- --------------------------
<PAGE>
Attachment A
Assist with the following projects and ongoing activities:
o Advice and counsel with regard to packaging businesses, foreign and
domestic
o Strategic relationships - mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint
ventures, and technology agreements
o Strategic and operational planning and analysis
o Advice, counsel and projects as requested by an authorized representative
of Ball
o Licensee relationships
Exhibit 12.1
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(dollars in millions) 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings from continuing operations before
taxes $ 171.2 $ 27.3 $ 85.9 $ 29.6 $ 76.9
Plus:
Interest expensed and capitalized 109.6 80.9 57.9 45.4 41.3
Interest expense within rent 24.5 15.4 12.7 9.1 5.6
Amortization of capitalized interest 3.1 2.1 2.6 2.1 1.9
Distributed income of equity investees
1.5 2.5 6.9 - 0.4
Less:
Interest capitalized (2.0) (2.3) (4.4) (6.6) (3.5)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Adjusted earnings 307.9 125.9 161.6 79.6 122.6
Fixed charges (1) 134.1 96.3 70.6 54.5 46.9
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 2.3x 1.3x 2.3x 1.5x 2.6x
- ------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(1) Fixed charges include interest expensed and capitalized as well as interest expense within rent.
</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 1999 1998 1997
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $3,584.2 $2,896.4 $2,388.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) 2,988.0 2,438.4 2,022.0
Depreciation and amortization (Notes 7 and 8) 162.9 145.0 117.5
Selling and administrative 140.9 119.4 106.1
Receivable securitization fees and product development (Note 5) 13.6 13.8 12.5
Headquarters relocation, plant closures, dispositions
and other costs (Note 4) - 73.9 (9.0)
------------- ------------- -------------
3,305.4 2,790.5 2,249.1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before interest and taxes 278.8 105.9 139.4
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense (Note 9) 107.6 78.6 53.5
------------- ------------- -------------
Earnings before taxes 171.2 27.3 85.9
Provision for taxes (Note 12) (64.9) (8.8) (32.0)
Minority interests (1.9) 7.9 5.1
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates (0.2) 5.6 (0.7)
------------- ------------- -------------
Earnings before extraordinary item and accounting change 104.2 32.0 58.3
Extraordinary loss from early debt extinguishment, net of tax - (12.1) -
Cumulative effect of accounting change for start-up costs, net of tax - (3.3) -
------------- ------------- -------------
Net earnings 104.2 16.6 58.3
Preferred dividends, net of tax (2.7) (2.8) (2.8)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings attributable to common shareholders $ 101.5 $ 13.8 $ 55.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings per common share before extraordinary item and accounting
change (Note 15) $ 3.36 $ 0.96 $ 1.84
Extraordinary loss from early debt extinguishment, net of tax - (0.40) -
Cumulative effect of accounting change for start-up costs, net of tax - (0.11) -
------------- ------------- -------------
Earnings per common share $ 3.36 $ 0.45 $ 1.84
============= ============= =============
Diluted earnings per share before extraordinary item and accounting
change (Note 15) $ 3.15 $ 0.91 $ 1.74
Extraordinary loss from early debt extinguishment, net of tax - (0.37) -
Cumulative effect of accounting change for start-up costs, net of tax - (0.10) -
------------- ------------- -------------
Diluted earnings per share $ 3.15 $ 0.44 $ 1.74
============= ============= =============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
<PAGE>
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Current assets
Cash and temporary investments $ 35.8 $ 34.0
Receivables, net (Note 5) 220.2 273.5
Inventories, net (Note 6) 565.9 483.8
Deferred taxes and prepaid expenses (Note 12) 73.9 94.3
------------- -------------
Total current assets 895.8 885.6
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 7) 1,121.2 1,174.4
Goodwill and other assets (Notes 3 and 8) 715.1 794.8
------------- -------------
Total Assets $2,732.1 $2,854.8
============= =============
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt (Note 9) $ 104.0 $ 126.8
Accounts payable 345.5 350.3
Salaries, wages and accrued employee benefits 114.7 97.1
Other current liabilities 105.9 113.4
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities 670.1 687.6
Long-term debt (Note 9) 1,092.7 1,229.8
Employee benefit obligations, deferred taxes and other liabilities
(Notes 12 and 13) 258.7 290.7
------------- -------------
Total liabilities 2,021.5 2,208.1
------------- -------------
Contingencies (Note 17)
Minority interests 19.7 24.4
------------- -------------
Shareholders' Equity (Note 14)
Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock 56.2 57.2
Unearned compensation - ESOP (20.5) (29.5)
------------- -------------
Preferred shareholder's equity 35.7 27.7
------------- -------------
Common stock (35,849,778 shares issued - 1999;
34,859,636 shares issued - 1998) 413.0 368.4
Retained earnings 481.2 397.9
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (26.7) (31.7)
Treasury stock, at cost (6,032,651 shares - 1999; 4,404,758
shares - 1998) (212.3) (140.0)
------------- -------------
Common shareholders' equity 655.2 594.6
------------- -------------
Total shareholders' equity 690.9 622.3
------------- -------------
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $2,732.1 $2,854.8
============= =============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
<PAGE>
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net earnings $ 104.2 $ 16.6 $ 58.3
Noncash charges to net earnings:
Depreciation and amortization 162.9 145.0 117.5
Deferred taxes 34.3 (7.6) 17.1
Headquarters relocation, plant closures, dispositions and
other costs - 60.9 (9.0)
Extraordinary loss from early debt extinguishment - 19.9 -
Other, net 6.1 (7.2) 2.2
Working capital changes, excluding effects of acquisitions and dispositions:
Receivables 53.5 93.9 (15.5)
Inventories (49.1) 27.7 (33.4)
Accounts payable (5.1) 54.7 (2.1)
Other, net (0.8) (16.8) 8.4
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 306.0 387.1 143.5
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment (107.0) (84.2) (97.7)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired - (838.4) (202.7)
Investments in and advances to affiliates (1.3) (2.2) (11.2)
Proceeds from sale of businesses - - 31.1
Other, net 15.6 9.7 29.6
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities (92.7) (915.1) (250.9)
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Long-term borrowings 23.1 1,180.4 2.4
Repayments of long-term borrowings (161.0) (357.8) (76.9)
Debt issuance costs - (28.9) -
Debt prepayment costs - (17.5) -
Change in short-term borrowings (13.2) (203.3) 72.0
Common and preferred dividends (22.5) (22.7) (22.9)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under
various employee and shareholder plans 36.8 31.5 21.7
Acquisitions of treasury stock (72.3) (34.9) (32.1)
Other, net (2.4) (10.3) (0.5)
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (211.5) 536.5 (36.3)
------------- ------------- -------------
Net Change in Cash and Temporary Investments 1.8 8.5 (143.7)
Cash and temporary investments - beginning of year 34.0 25.5 169.2
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash and Temporary Investments - End of Year $ 35.8 $ 34.0 $ 25.5
============= ============= =============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
<PAGE>
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Earnings
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Shares Years ended December 31,
(in thousands) ($ in millions)
1999 1998 1997 1999 1998 1997
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Series B ESOP Convertible
Preferred Stock
Balance, beginning of year 1,587 1,635 1,681 $ 57.2 $ 59.9 $ 61.7
Shares retired (57) (48) (46) (1.0) (2.7) (1.8)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance, end of year 1,530 1,587 1,635 $ 56.2 $ 57.2 $ 59.9
============= ============= ============= ============= ============= =============
Unearned Compensation - ESOP
Balance, beginning of year $ (29.5) $ (37.0) $ (44.0)
Amortization 9.0 7.5 7.0
------------- ------------- -------------
Balance, end of year $ (20.5) $ (29.5) $ (37.0)
============= ============= =============
Common Stock
Balance, beginning of year 34,860 33,759 32,977 $ 368.4 $ 336.9 $ 315.2
Shares issued for stock options and
other employee and shareholder stock
plans less shares exchanged 990 1,101 782 44.6 31.5 21.7
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance, end of year 35,850 34,860 33,759 $ 413.0 $ 368.4 $ 336.9
============= ============= ============= ============= ============= =============
Retained Earnings
Balance, beginning of year $ 397.9 $ 402.3 $ 365.2
Net earnings 104.2 16.6 58.3
Common dividends (18.2) (18.2) (18.4)
Preferred dividends, net of tax (2.7) (2.8) (2.8)
------------- ------------- -------------
Balance, end of year $ 481.2 $ 397.9 $ 402.3
============= ============= =============
Treasury Stock
Balance, beginning of year (4,405) (3,540) (2,458) $(140.0) $(105.1) $ (73.0)
Shares reacquired (1,628) (865) (1,082) (72.3) (34.9) (32.1)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance, end of year (6,033) (4,405) (3,540) $(212.3) $(140.0) $(105.1)
============= ============= ============= ============= ============= =============
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
Accumulated Accumulated Accumulated
Other Other Other
Comprehensive Comprehensive Comprehensive Comprehensive Comprehensive Comprehensive
Earnings Loss Earnings Loss Earnings Loss
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Comprehensive Earnings (Loss)
Balance, beginning of year $ (31.7) $ (22.8) $ (20.7)
Net earnings $ 104.2 $ 16.6 $ 58.3
------------- ------------- -------------
Foreign currency translation adjustment 4.0 (7.7) (2.6)
Minimum pension liability adjustment,
net of tax 1.0 (1.2) 0.5
------------- ------------- -------------
Other comprehensive earnings (loss) 5.0 5.0 (8.9) (8.9) (2.1) (2.1)
------------- ------------- -------------
Comprehensive earnings $ 109.2 $ 7.7 $ 56.2
============= ------------- ============= ------------- ============= -------------
Balance, end of year $ (26.7) $ (31.7) $ (22.8)
============= ============= =============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
<PAGE>
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ball Corporation
and its controlled affiliates in which it holds a majority equity position
(collectively, Ball or the Company). Investments in 20 percent through
50 percent-owned affiliates are accounted for by the equity method where Ball
exercises significant influence over operating and financial affairs. Otherwise,
investments are included at cost. Differences between the carrying amounts of
equity investments and the Company's interest in underlying net assets are
amortized over periods benefited. Significant intercompany transactions are
eliminated. The results of subsidiaries and equity affiliates in Asia and South
America are reflected in the consolidated financial statements on a one-month
lag.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform with the
current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
Generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingencies and reported amounts of revenues and expenses.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations, where the local currency is the
functional currency, are translated using period-end exchange rates, and
revenues and expenses are translated using average exchange rates during each
period. Translation gains and losses are reported in accumulated other
comprehensive loss as a component of common shareholders' equity.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products in the packaging segment are recognized primarily upon the
unconditional shipment of products. In the case of long-term contracts within
the aerospace and technologies segment, sales are recognized under the
cost-to-cost, percentage-of-completion method. Certain U.S. government contracts
contain profit incentives based upon performance relative to predetermined
targets or cost performance. Profit incentives are recorded when there is
sufficient information to assess anticipated contract performance. Provision for
estimated contract losses, if any, is made in the period that such losses are
determined.
Temporary Investments
Temporary investments are considered cash equivalents if original maturities are
three months or less.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The company uses derivative financial instruments primarily for the purpose of
hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange
rates, raw materials purchasing and the common share repurchase program. Accrual
accounting is applied for financial instruments classified as hedges. Costs of
hedging instruments are deferred as a cost adjustment, or deferred and amortized
as a yield adjustment, over the term of the hedging agreement. Gains and losses
on early terminations of derivative financial instruments related to debt are
deferred and amortized as yield adjustments. Deferred gains and losses related
to exchange rate forwards are recognized as cost adjustments of the related
purchase or sale transaction. If a financial instrument no longer qualifies as
an effective hedge, the instrument is recorded at fair market value.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost for certain U.S.
metal beverage container inventories and substantially all inventories within
the U.S. metal food container business is determined using the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method of accounting. The cost for remaining inventories is
determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method in amounts sufficient to
amortize the cost of the properties over their estimated useful lives (buildings
and improvements - 15 to 40 years; machinery and equipment - 5 to 15 years).
Goodwill is amortized using the straight-line method over 40 years. The Company
evaluates long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangibles, when
significant economic events suggest that they may be impaired or may not be
fully recoverable or the depreciation or amortization period should be
reconsidered. In estimating the useful lives, consideration is given to the
factors in paragraphs 27 through 32 of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 17.
As part of the valuation process, the Company considers the fair value and cash
flow measurement techniques described in paragraphs 6 through 10 of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121. Undiscounted cash flows serve as
a basis for determination of realizability or impairment.
Taxes on Income
Deferred income taxes reflect the future tax consequences of differences between
the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at
each balance sheet date, based upon enacted income tax laws and tax rates.
Income tax expense or benefit is provided based on earnings reported in the
financial statements. The provision for income tax expense or benefit differs
from the amounts of income taxes currently payable because certain items of
income and expense included in the consolidated financial statements are
recognized in different time periods by taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets
and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that
any portion of these tax attributes will not be realized.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Ball records the cost of its Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) using the
shares allocated transitional method under which the annual pretax cost of the
ESOP, including preferred dividends, approximates program funding. Compensation
and interest components of ESOP cost are included in net earnings; preferred
dividends, net of related tax benefits, are shown as a reduction from net
earnings. Unearned compensation recorded within the accompanying balance sheet
and related to the ESOP is reduced as the principal of the guaranteed ESOP notes
is amortized.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per common share are computed by dividing the net earnings attributable
to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential
dilution that could occur if the Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock (ESOP
Preferred) was converted into additional outstanding common shares and
outstanding dilutive stock options were exercised. In the diluted computation,
net earnings attributable to common shareholders are adjusted for additional
ESOP contributions which would be required if the ESOP Preferred was converted
to common shares and exclude the tax benefit of deductible common dividends upon
the assumed conversion of the ESOP Preferred.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use," establishes new accounting and
reporting standards for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for
internal use and was effective for Ball in 1999. The adoption of SOP No. 98-1
did not have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations or
financial condition in 1999.
During the fourth quarter of 1998, Ball adopted SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on
the Costs of Start-Up Activities," in advance of its required 1999
implementation date. SOP No. 98-5 requires that costs of start-up activities and
organizational costs, as defined, be expensed as incurred. In accordance with
this statement, the Company recorded an after-tax charge to earnings of
approximately $3.3 million (11 cents per share), retroactive to January 1, 1998,
representing the cumulative effect of this change in accounting on prior years.
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities," essentially requires all derivatives to be recorded on the balance
sheet at fair value and establishes new accounting practices for hedge
instruments. In June 1999 SFAS No. 137 was issued to defer the effective date of
SFAS No. 133 by one year. As a result, SFAS No. 133 will not be effective for
Ball until 2001. The effect, if any, of adopting this standard has not yet been
determined.
2. Business Segment Information
Ball's operations are organized along its product lines and include two segments
- - the packaging segment and the aerospace and technologies segment. The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. See notes 3 and 4 for information
regarding transactions affecting segment results.
Packaging
The packaging segment includes the manufacture and sale of metal and PET
(polyethylene terephthalate) containers, primarily for use in beverage and food
packaging. The Company's consolidated packaging operations are located in and
serve North America (the U.S. and Canada) and Asia, primarily the People's
Republic of China (PRC). Packaging operations in the U.S. have increased as a
result of the August 1998 acquisition of the North American beverage can
manufacturing business of Reynolds Metals Company. Operations in Asia also have
increased as a result of the early 1997 acquisition of a controlling interest in
Ball Asia Pacific Limited, formerly M.C. Packaging (Hong Kong) Limited. The
results of both operations are included within the packaging segment since their
acquisition dates. Ball also has investments in packaging companies in Brazil
and Thailand which are accounted for under the equity method, and, accordingly,
those results are not included in segment earnings or assets.
<PAGE>
Aerospace and Technologies
The aerospace and technologies segment includes civil space systems, defense
systems, commercial space operations, commercial products and technologies,
systems engineering services, advanced antenna and video systems and engineering
technology products.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Summary of Business by Segment
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales
Packaging $ 3,201.2 $ 2,533.8 $ 1,989.8
Aerospace and technologies 383.0 362.6 398.7
-------------- -------------- --------------
Consolidated net sales $ 3,584.2 $ 2,896.4 $ 2,388.5
============== ============== ==============
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
Packaging $ 276.7 $ 164.7 $ 108.3
Plant closures, dispositions and other costs (Note 4) - (56.2) (3.0)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Total packaging 276.7 108.5 105.3
Aerospace and technologies 24.9 30.4 34.0
-------------- -------------- --------------
Segment earnings before interest and taxes 301.6 138.9 139.3
Headquarters relocation costs (Note 4) - (17.7) -
Corporate undistributed expenses (22.8) (15.3) (11.9)
Dispositions and other (Note 4) - - 12.0
-------------- -------------- --------------
Earnings before interest and taxes 278.8 105.9 139.4
Interest expense (107.6) (78.6) (53.5)
Provision for income tax expense (64.9) (8.8) (32.0)
Minority interests (1.9) 7.9 5.1
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates (0.2) 5.6 (0.7)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Consolidated earnings before extraordinary item and
accounting change $ 104.2 $ 32.0 $ 58.3
============== ============== ==============
Depreciation and Amortization
Packaging $ 146.4 $ 125.8 $ 101.4
Aerospace and technologies 13.5 15.0 14.3
-------------- -------------- --------------
Segment depreciation and amortization 159.9 140.8 115.7
Corporate 3.0 4.2 1.8
-------------- -------------- --------------
Consolidated depreciation and amortization $ 162.9 $ 145.0 $ 117.5
============== ============== ==============
Net Investment
Packaging $ 1,319.7 $ 1,164.3 $ 1,088.5
Aerospace and technologies 161.6 143.5 126.6
-------------- -------------- --------------
Segment net investment 1,481.3 1,307.8 1,215.1
Corporate net investment and eliminations (790.4) (685.5) (580.9)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Consolidated net investment $ 690.9 $ 622.3 $ 634.2
============== ============== ==============
Investments in Equity Affiliates
Packaging $ 79.0 $ 80.9 $ 74.5
Aerospace and technologies 2.3 - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Segment investments in equity affiliates 81.3 80.9 74.5
Corporate - - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Consolidated investments in equity affiliates $ 81.3 $ 80.9 $ 74.5
============== ============== ==============
Property, Plant and Equipment Additions
Packaging $ 95.8 $ 63.7 $ 75.7
Aerospace and technologies 10.1 17.2 18.6
-------------- -------------- --------------
Segment property, plant and equipment additions 105.9 80.9 94.3
Corporate 1.1 3.3 3.4
-------------- -------------- --------------
Consolidated property, plant and equipment additions $ 107.0 $ 84.2 $ 97.7
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Financial data segmented by geographic area is provided below.
Summary of Net Sales by Geographic Area
($ in millions) U.S. Other (1) Consolidated
------------ ------------ ------------
1999 $3,128.3 $ 455.9 $ 3,584.2
1998 2,449.5 446.9 2,896.4
1997 1,888.9 499.6 2,388.5
(1) Includes the Company's net sales in the PRC and Canada, neither of which are
significant, intercompany eliminations and other.
Summary of Long-Lived Assets(1) by Geographic Area
($ in millions) U.S. PRC Other (2) Consolidated
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
1999 $1,701.6 $ 352.0 $ (217.3) $1,836.3
1998 1,763.2 369.3 (163.3) 1,969.2
1997 972.4 465.5 (145.9) 1,292.0
(1) Long-lived assets primarily consist of property, plant and equipment,
goodwill and other intangible assets.
(2) Includes the Company's long-lived assets in Canada, which are not
significant, intercompany eliminations and other.
Major Customers
Packaging segment sales to Miller Brewing Company, a customer since a 1998
acquisition, represented approximately 15 percent of net sales in 1999 and less
than 10 percent in 1998. Sales to PepsiCo, Inc., and affiliates represented
approximately 13 percent of consolidated net sales in 1999, 15 percent of
consolidated net sales in 1998 and 12 percent of consolidated net sales in 1997.
Sales to Coca-Cola and affiliates represented 11 percent of consolidated net
sales in 1999, 10 percent of consolidated net sales in 1998 and less than 10
percent in 1997. Sales to all bottlers of Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola branded
beverages comprised approximately 35 percent of consolidated net sales in 1999,
40 percent of consolidated net sales in 1998 and 36 percent of consolidated net
sales in 1997. Sales to various U.S. government agencies by the aerospace and
technologies segment, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor,
represented approximately 9 percent, 11 percent and 14 percent of consolidated
net sales in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
3. Acquisitions
Metal Beverage Container Manufacturing Business
On August 10, 1998, Ball acquired substantially all the assets and assumed
certain liabilities of the North American beverage can manufacturing business of
Reynolds Metals Company (Acquisition) for approximately $745.4 million, before a
refundable incentive loan of $39 million, a working capital adjustment of an
additional $40.1 million and transaction costs. The assets acquired consisted
largely of 16 plants in 12 states and Puerto Rico. The Acquisition has been
accounted for as a purchase, with its results included in the Company's
consolidated financial statements effective with the Acquisition.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company has provided $51.3 million
in the opening balance sheet for certain costs of integrating the acquired
business, including capacity consolidations. The Company finalized its
integration plan during the third quarter of 1999, which includes the closure of
the acquired Richmond, Virginia, headquarters facility in 1998, the closure of
two plants in the first quarter of 1999 and the closure of a third plant which
was phased out, beginning in the fourth quarter of 1999 and concluding in the
first quarter of 2000. The plants and certain equipment are for sale. Employees
of the closed facilities, primarily manufacturing and support personnel, were
terminated after proper notification. Integration costs included $23.3 million
for severance, supplemental unemployment, medical, relocation and other related
termination benefits; $22.8 million for contractual pension and retirement
obligations; and $5.2 million for other plant closure costs. The decrease of
$5.5 million from the previously reported estimate was the result of finalizing
actuarial calculations of employee benefit termination costs and refining other
exit costs based upon economic factors within the geographic regions where the
plants are located. These changes have been reflected as a reduction of
goodwill. Subsequent increases in actual costs, if any, will be included in
current period earnings, and decreases, if any, will result in a further
reduction of goodwill.
As of December 31, 1999, the Company has made payments of $10.5 million
related to severance, supplemental unemployment, relocation and other
termination costs and $3 million related to other plant closure costs. The
carrying value of the fixed assets held for sale is approximately $21.5 million
at December 31, 1999.
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the integration costs associated with the
Acquisition as provided for in the opening balance sheet:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pension and
Other
($ in millions) Employee Postretirement Other Exit
Severance Benefits Costs Total
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Final opening balance sheet amounts $ 23.3 $ 22.8 $ 5.2 $ 51.3
Payments made (10.5) - (3.0) (13.5)
Transfer to pension and other postretirement
benefit accounts - (22.8) - (22.8)
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balance at December 31, 1999 $ 12.8 $ - $ 2.2 $ 15.0
============== ============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
The following is a summary of the net assets acquired which includes the
final purchase accounting adjustments including final asset valuations, purchase
price allocations, estimated integration and capacity consolidation costs and
transaction costs. As part of the acquired asset valuation and purchase price
allocation process, approximately $336.8 million has been assigned to goodwill.
($ in millions)
Total assets $ 937.9
Less liabilities assumed:
Current liabilities 65.7
Long-term liabilities 86.7
-----------
Net assets acquired 785.5
Incentive loan 39.0
Transaction costs 13.9
-----------
Total consideration $ 838.4
===========
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations have
been prepared as if the Acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 1997. The pro
forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would
have occurred had the Acquisition been in effect for the periods presented, nor
are they necessarily indicative of the results that may be obtained in the
future:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
-----------------------------
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 1998 1997
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 3,667.9 $ 3,581.2
Net earnings 31.5 47.9
Earnings attributable to common shareholders 28.7 45.1
Earnings per common share, including accounting change 0.94 1.49
Diluted earnings per share, including accounting change 0.90 1.42
</TABLE>
Pro forma adjustments include increased interest expense related to
incremental borrowings used to finance the Acquisition, the amortization of
goodwill, the change in depreciation expense on plant and equipment based on
estimated useful lives partially offset by increased fair values, and the
elimination of the extraordinary loss on early debt extinguishment. Pro forma
results exclude anticipated synergies.
Other Acquisitions
In early 1997 Ball acquired approximately 75 percent of Ball Asia Pacific
Limited for approximately $179.7 million. During 1998 and 1999, the Company
purchased all of the remaining direct and indirect minority interests in Ball
Asia Pacific Limited. In the third quarter of 1997, the Company acquired certain
PET container assets for approximately $42.7 million from Brunswick Container
Corporation.
4. Headquarters Relocation, Plant Closures, Dispositions and Other Costs
The following table summarizes the transaction gains and losses in connection
with the headquarters relocation, plant closures in the PRC, dispositions and
other non-acquisition-related charges included in the consolidated statement of
earnings.
($ in millions) Pretax Gain
(Loss)
------------------
1998
Headquarters relocation $(17.7)
Plant closings and other costs (56.2)
------------------
$(73.9)
==================
1997
Sale of investment in Datum $ 11.7
Plant closing (3.0)
Disposition and write-down of equity investments 0.3
------------------
$ 9.0
==================
1998
In February 1998 Ball announced that it would relocate its corporate
headquarters to an existing company-owned building in Broomfield, Colorado. In
connection with the relocation, which has been completed, the Company recorded a
pretax charge in 1998 of $17.7 million ($10.8 million after tax or 36 cents per
share), primarily for employee-related costs, substantially all of which were
paid by the end of that year.
During the last quarter of 1998, the Company announced the closure of two
of its plants located in the PRC and removed from service manufacturing
equipment at a third plant. The actions were taken largely to address industry
overcapacity and were completed in the first half of 1999. The Company's
preliminary estimates included a $56.2 million, largely noncash, charge in the
fourth quarter of 1998 to write down to net realizable value certain buildings
and equipment by $22.8 million, goodwill by $15.3 million, inventory by
$2.5 million and machinery spare parts by $3.5 million, as well as $12.1 million
for other assets and related costs. The total after-tax effect of the estimated
plant closings and other costs was a loss of $31.4 million ($1.03 per share).
Estimated fair market values of the assets were determined by management and
engineering support staff based on a market approach. The carrying value of the
fixed assets held for sale is approximately $10 million at December 31, 1999. In
1999 the Company entered into an agreement to sell a plant in Hong Kong at a
loss of approximately $2.8 million, which was offset by income of $2.3 million
primarily related to cash collections on certain receivables which were fully
reserved in 1998. The net charge of $0.5 million is included in cost of sales in
the consolidated statement of earnings. Net cash proceeds from the sale of the
building and collection of the receivables were $7.1 million. Further changes to
the estimates, if any, will be reflected as adjustments to the current year's
earnings.
The activity related to the 1998 charge for plant closings and other costs
is summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Inventory/ Other
($ in millions) Spare Parts Fixed Assets Goodwill Assets/Costs Total
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Charge to earnings in 1998 $ 6.0 $ 22.8 $ 15.3 $ 12.1 $ 56.2
Charges (recoveries) during 1999 (0.3) 2.8 - (2.0) 0.5
Payments/transfers - - (15.3) (0.5) (15.8)
Utilization (0.7) (2.8) - (3.7) (7.2)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance at December 31, 1999 $ 5.0 $ 22.8 $ - $ 5.9 $ 33.7
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
1997
In the first half of 1997, the Company sold its interest in the common stock of
Datum Inc. (Datum) for approximately $26.2 million, recording a pretax gain of
$11.7 million. Ball acquired its interest in Datum in connection with the 1995
disposition of its Efratom time and frequency measurement devices business. The
Company owned approximately 32 percent of Datum. Ball's share of Datum's
earnings under the equity method of accounting was $0.5 million and $0.3 million
in 1997 and 1995, respectively, and a loss of $0.2 million in 1996.
In the second quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a pretax charge of
$3 million to close a small PET container manufacturing plant in connection with
the acquisition of certain PET container manufacturing assets. Operations ceased
during that quarter.
In the fourth quarter of 1997, Ball disposed of and wrote down to estimated
net realizable value certain equity investments, resulting in a net pretax gain
of $0.3 million. The Company's equity in the net earnings of these affiliates
was not significant in 1997.
The net after-tax effect of the 1997 transactions was a gain of $5 million
(16 cents per share).
<PAGE>
5. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of
$8.8 million and $7.0 million at December 31, 1999, and 1998, respectively.
Trade Accounts Receivable Securitization Agreement
A securitization agreement provides for the ongoing, revolving sale of a
designated pool of trade accounts receivable of Ball's U.S. packaging
businesses. In December 1998 the designated pool of receivables was increased to
provide for sales of up to $125 million from the previous amount of $75 million.
Net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled
$122.5 million at both December 31, 1999, and 1998. Fees incurred in connection
with the sale of accounts receivable totaled $7 million in 1999 and $4 million
in each of 1998 and 1997.
Accounts Receivable in Connection with Long-Term Contracts
Net accounts receivable under long-term contracts, due primarily from agencies
of the U.S. government, were $83.8 million and $76.1 million at December 31,
1999, and 1998, respectively, and include unbilled amounts representing revenue
earned but contractually not yet billable of $40.5 million and $44.2 million,
respectively. The average length of the long-term contracts is approximately
three years and the average length remaining on those contracts at December 31,
1999, was approximately 15 months. Approximately $13.3 million of unbilled
receivables at December 31, 1999, is expected to be collected after one year and
is related to fees and cost withholds that will be paid largely upon completion
of milestones or other contract terms as well as final overhead rate
settlements.
6. Inventories
December 31,
-------------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998
------------- --------------
Raw materials and supplies $ 238.0 $ 131.2
Work in process and finished goods 327.9 352.6
------------- --------------
$ 565.9 $ 483.8
============= ==============
Approximately 58 percent and 39 percent of total inventories at December 31,
1999, and 1998, respectively, were valued using the LIFO method of accounting.
Inventories at December 31, 1999, would have been $4.1 million lower than the
reported amount if the FIFO method of accounting, which approximates replacement
cost, had been used for those inventories. At December 31, 1998, LIFO cost
approximated replacement cost.
7. Property, Plant and Equipment
December 31,
-------------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998
-------------- -------------
Land $ 61.6 $ 62.2
Buildings 433.6 410.5
Machinery and equipment 1,439.4 1,410.2
-------------- -------------
1,934.6 1,882.9
Accumulated depreciation (813.4) (708.5)
-------------- -------------
$1,121.2 $1,174.4
============== =============
Depreciation expense amounted to $143.8 million, $130.8 million and $110
for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
8. Goodwill and Other Assets
December 31,
-------------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998
-------------- -------------
$ 482.9 $ 555.9
Investments in affiliates 81.3 80.9
Other 150.9 158.0
-------------- -------------
$ 715.1 $ 794.8
============== =============
Goodwill is net of accumulated amortization of $41.9 million and
$28.9 million at December 31, 1999, and 1998, respectively. Total amortization
expense amounted to $19.1 million, $14.2 million and $7.5 million for the years
ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, of which $13.4 million,
$7.4 million and $4.7 million related to the amortization of goodwill.
<PAGE>
9. Debt and Interest Costs
Short-term debt consisted of Asian bank facilities in U.S. dollars and PRC
currencies, all without recourse to Ball Corporation and its North American
subsidiaries. Approximately $57.2 million and $70.6 million were outstanding
under these facilities at December 31, 1999, and 1998, respectively. The
weighted average rate of the outstanding facilities was 6.8 percent at
December 31, 1999, and 7.4 percent at December 31, 1998.
Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
($ in millions) 1999 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Notes Payable
7.75% Senior Notes due August 2006 $ 300.0 $ 300.0
8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due August 2008 250.0 250.0
Senior Credit Facility:
Term Loan A due August 2004 (1999 - 7%; 1998 - 7.188%) 330.0 350.0
Term Loan B due March 2006 (1999 - 8%; 1998 - 7.563%) 198.0 200.0
Revolving credit facility (1998 - 7.188% weighted average rate) - 80.0
Floating rate notes due through 2002 (1998 - 6.25% to 7.56%) (1) - 48.2
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds
Floating rates due through 2011 (1999 - 5.35%; 1998 - 4.1% to 4.3%) 27.1 27.1
ESOP Debt Guarantee
9.23% installment notes due through 1999 - 4.4
9.60% installment note due 1999 through 2001 20.5 25.1
Other 13.9 1.2
---------- ----------
1,139.5 1,286.0
Less: Current portion of long-term debt 46.8 56.2
---------- ----------
$1,092.7 $1,229.8
========== ==========
(1) U.S. dollar-denominated notes issued by Ball's Asian subsidiary and its consolidated affiliates.
</TABLE>
In connection with the Acquisition in 1998, the Company refinanced
approximately $521.9 million of its existing debt and, as a result, recorded an
after-tax extraordinary charge from the early extinguishment of debt of
approximately $12.1 million (40 cents per share). The Acquisition and the
refinancing, including related costs, were financed with a placement of
$300 million in 7.75% Senior Notes due in 2006, $250 million in 8.25% Senior
Subordinated Notes due in 2008 and approximately $808.2 million from a Senior
Credit Facility. The Senior Credit Facility bears interest at variable rates and
is comprised of four separate facilities: (1) Term Loan A for $350 million due
in 2004, (2) Term Loan B for $200 million due in 2006, (3) a revolving credit
facility which provides the Company with up to $600 million, comprised of a
$150 million, 364-day annually renewable facility and a $450 million long-term
committed facility expiring in 2004 and (4) a $50 million long-term committed
Canadian facility. At December 31, 1999, approximately $585 million was
available under the revolving credit facilities.
All of the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes were exchanged as of
January 27, 1999. The terms of the new notes are substantially identical in all
respects (including principal amount, interest rate, maturity, ranking and
covenant restrictions) to the terms of the notes for which they were exchanged
except that the new notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and therefore are not subject to certain restrictions on transfer
except as described in the Prospectus for the Exchange Offer. The note
agreements provide that if the new notes are assigned investment grade ratings
and the Company is not in default, certain covenant restrictions will be
suspended.
The Senior Notes, Senior Subordinated Notes and Senior Credit Facility
agreements are guaranteed on a full, unconditional and joint and several basis
by certain of the Company's domestic wholly owned subsidiaries. All amounts
outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility are secured by (1) a pledge of
100 percent of the stock owned by the Company of its direct and indirect
majority-owned domestic subsidiaries and (2) a pledge of the Company's stock,
owned directly or indirectly, of certain foreign subsidiaries which equals
65 percent of the stock of each such foreign subsidiary. Separate financial
statements for the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries are
not presented because management has determined that such financial statements
would not be material to investors. Condensed, consolidating financial
information for the Company, segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and
non-guarantor subsidiaries, are provided below.
Ball's Asian subsidiary and its consolidated affiliates had short-term
uncommitted credit facilities of approximately $113 million, of which
$57.2 million was outstanding at December 31, 1999.
Fixed-term debt in the PRC at year end 1998 included approximately
$48.2 million of floating rate notes issued by the Company's consolidated Asian
affiliates. There were no amounts outstanding under these agreements at
December 31, 1999.
<PAGE>
Maturities of all fixed long-term debt obligations outstanding at
December 31, 1999, are $46.8 million, $69.5 million, $69.3 million,
$89.3 million and $102.5 million for the years ending December 31, 2000,
through 2004, respectively, and $762.1 million thereafter.
Ball issues letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure
liabilities recorded in connection with the Company's deferred compensation
program, industrial development revenue bonds and insurance arrangements, of
which $64.8 million were outstanding at December 31, 1999. The Company's Asian
subsidiary also issues letters of credit in the ordinary course of business in
connection with supplier arrangements and provides guarantees to secure bank
financing for its affiliates. At year end, approximately $14.2 million of
letters of credit were outstanding associated with these arrangements. Ball also
has provided a completion guarantee representing 50 percent of the $44 million
of debt issued by the Company's Brazilian joint venture to fund the construction
of facilities. ESOP debt represents borrowings by the trust for the
Ball-sponsored ESOP which have been irrevocably guaranteed by the Company.
The U.S. note agreements, bank credit agreement, ESOP debt guarantee and
industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions
relating to dividends, investments, guarantees and the incurrence of additional
indebtedness.
A summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows:
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest costs $ 109.6 $ 80.9 $ 57.9
Amounts capitalized (2.0) (2.3) (4.4)
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest expense $ 107.6 $ 78.6 $ 53.5
========== ========== ==========
Interest paid during the year $ 111.2 $ 63.3 $ 53.9
========== ========== ==========
Subsidiary Guarantees of Debt
The Company's Senior Notes, Senior Subordinated Notes and Senior Credit Facility
agreements are guaranteed on a full, unconditional, and joint and several basis
by certain of the Company's wholly owned domestic subsidiaries. The following is
condensed, consolidating financial information for the Company, segregating the
guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries, as of December 31, 1999
and 1998 and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 (in millions
of dollars). Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified in order to
conform with the current year presentation. Separate financial statements for
the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries are not presented
because management has determined that such financial statements would not be
material to investors.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and temporary investments $ 13.6 $ 0.2 $ 22.0 $ - $ 35.8
Accounts receivable, net 4.1 151.7 64.4 - 220.2
Inventories, net - 452.1 113.8 - 565.9
Deferred income tax benefits and
prepaid expenses 129.2 94.8 13.0 (163.1) 73.9
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total current assets 146.9 698.8 213.2 (163.1) 895.8
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 25.4 1,525.5 383.7 - 1,934.6
Accumulated depreciation (13.5) (697.5) (102.4) - (813.4)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
11.9 828.0 281.3 - 1,121.2
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Investment in subsidiaries 1,412.4 337.7 10.3 (1,760.4) -
Investment in affiliates 9.0 2.3 70.0 - 81.3
Goodwill, net - 365.2 117.7 - 482.9
Other assets 88.9 37.5 24.5 - 150.9
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
$ 1,669.1 $ 2,269.5 $ 717.0 $ (1,923.5) $ 2,732.1
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term debt and current portion
of long-term debt $ 46.8 $ - $ 57.2 $ - $ 104.0
Accounts payable 4.5 285.3 55.7 - 345.5
Salaries and wages 7.3 99.1 8.3 - 114.7
Other current liabilities 35.0 193.3 40.7 (163.1) 105.9
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total current liabilities 93.6 577.7 161.9 (163.1) 670.1
Long-term debt 1,068.7 24.0 - - 1,092.7
Intercompany borrowings (302.6) 199.1 103.5 - -
Employee benefit obligations, deferred
income taxes and other 118.5 83.1 57.1 - 258.7
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total liabilities 978.2 883.9 322.5 (163.1) 2,021.5
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Contingencies
Minority interests - - 19.7 - 19.7
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Shareholders' equity
Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred
Stock 56.2 - - - 56.2
Convertible preferred stock - - 179.6 (179.6) -
Unearned compensation - ESOP (20.5) - - - (20.5)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Preferred shareholders' equity 35.7 - 179.6 (179.6) 35.7
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Common stock 413.0 1,155.7 240.9 (1,396.6) 413.0
Retained earnings 481.2 231.2 (23.7) (207.5) 481.2
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (26.7) (1.3) (22.0) 23.3 (26.7)
Treasury stock, at cost (212.3) - - - (212.3)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Common shareholders' equity 655.2 1,385.6 195.2 (1,580.8) 655.2
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total shareholders' equity 690.9 1,385.6 374.8 (1,760.4) 690.9
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
$ 1,669.1 $ 2,269.5 $ 717.0 $ (1,923.5) $ 2,732.1
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and temporary investments $ 11.6 $ 0.5 $ 21.9 $ - $ 34.0
Accounts receivable, net 3.5 194.1 75.9 - 273.5
Inventories, net - 382.5 101.3 - 483.8
Deferred income tax benefits and
prepaid expenses (2.0) 76.9 19.4 - 94.3
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total current assets 13.1 654.0 218.5 - 885.6
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 35.5 1,471.5 375.9 - 1,882.9
Accumulated depreciation (19.8) (606.0) (82.7) - (708.5)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
15.7 865.5 293.2 - 1,174.4
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Investment in subsidiaries 1,241.2 0.7 4.8 (1,246.7) -
Investment in affiliates 5.8 2.2 72.9 - 80.9
Goodwill, net - 431.1 124.8 - 555.9
Other assets 97.1 42.5 18.4 - 158.0
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
$ 1,372.9 $ 1,996.0 $ 732.6 $ (1,246.7) $ 2,854.8
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term debt and current portion
of long-term debt $ 31.1 $ - $ 95.7 $ - $ 126.8
Accounts payable 48.3 251.2 50.8 - 350.3
Salaries and wages 14.1 75.1 7.9 - 97.1
Other current liabilities (50.7) 121.7 42.4 - 113.4
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total current liabilities 42.8 448.0 196.8 - 687.6
Long-term debt 1,195.4 10.5 23.9 - 1,229.8
Intercompany borrowings (596.6) 477.3 119.3 - -
Employee benefit obligations, deferred
income taxes and other 109.0 126.5 55.2 - 290.7
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total liabilities 750.6 1,062.3 395.2 - 2,208.1
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Contingencies
Minority interests - - 24.4 - 24.4
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Shareholders' equity
Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred
Stock 57.2 - - - 57.2
Convertible preferred stock - - 174.6 (174.6) -
Unearned compensation - ESOP (29.5) - - - (29.5)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Preferred shareholders' equity 27.7 - 174.6 (174.6) 27.7
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Common stock 368.4 821.7 187.9 (1,009.6) 368.4
Retained earnings 397.9 114.3 (24.5) (89.8) 397.9
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (31.7) (2.3) (25.0) 27.3 (31.7)
Treasury stock, at cost (140.0) - - - (140.0)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Common shareholders' equity 594.6 933.7 138.4 (1,072.1) 594.6
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Total shareholders' equity 622.3 933.7 313.0 (1,246.7) 622.3
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
$ 1,372.9 $ 1,996.0 $ 732.6 $ (1,246.7) $ 2,854.8
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ - $ 3,381.0 $ 451.5 $ (248.3) $ 3,584.2
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation
and amortization) - 2,863.0 373.3 (248.3) 2,988.0
Depreciation and amortization 3.0 130.1 29.8 - 162.9
Selling and administrative 15.3 97.5 28.1 - 140.9
Receivable securitization fees and
product development - 13.5 0.1 - 13.6
Interest expense 60.8 37.3 9.5 - 107.6
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries (119.4) - - 119.4 -
Corporate allocations (49.7) 49.7 - - -
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
(90.0) 3,191.1 440.8 (128.9) 3,413.0
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Earnings (loss) before taxes 90.0 189.9 10.7 (119.4) 171.2
Provision for taxes 13.9 (72.7) (6.1) - (64.9)
Minority interests - - (1.9) - (1.9)
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates 0.3 (0.2) (0.3) - (0.2)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net earnings (loss) 104.2 117.0 2.4 (119.4) 104.2
Preferred dividends, net of tax (2.7) - - - (2.7)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Earnings (loss) attributable to common
shareholders $ 101.5 $ 117.0 $ 2.4 $ (119.4) $ 101.5
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ - $ 2,685.6 $ 451.1 $ (240.3) $ 2,896.4
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation
and amortization) - 2,300.3 378.4 (240.3) 2,438.4
Depreciation and amortization 4.2 108.6 32.2 - 145.0
Selling and administrative 14.3 75.9 29.2 - 119.4
Receivable securitization fees
and product development - 13.7 0.1 - 13.8
Headquarters relocation, plant closures,
dispositions and other costs 17.7 - 56.2 - 73.9
Interest expense 52.7 8.3 17.6 - 78.6
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries (15.1) - - 15.1 -
Corporate allocations (45.3) 45.3 - - -
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
28.5 2,552.1 513.7 (225.2) 2,869.1
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Earnings (loss) before taxes (28.5) 133.5 (62.6) (15.1) 27.3
Provision for taxes 47.0 (47.9) (7.9) - (8.8)
Minority interests - - 7.9 - 7.9
Equity in (losses) earnings of affiliates (0.7) - 6.3 - 5.6
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary
item and accounting change 17.8 85.6 (56.3) (15.1) 32.0
Extraordinary loss from early debt
extinguishment, net of tax (1.2) (10.9) - - (12.1)
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax - (1.8) (1.5) - (3.3)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net earnings (loss) 16.6 72.9 (57.8) (15.1) 16.6
Preferred dividends, net of tax (2.8) - - - (2.8)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Earnings (loss) attributable to common
shareholders $ 13.8 $ 72.9 $ (57.8) $ (15.1) $ 13.8
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Year Ended December 31, 1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ - $ 2,156.7 $ 503.2 $ (271.4) $ 2,388.5
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation
and amortization) - 1,873.0 420.4 (271.4) 2,022.0
Depreciation and amortization 1.2 86.3 30.0 - 117.5
Selling and administrative 0.2 78.7 27.2 - 106.1
Receivable securitization fees
and product development - 12.3 0.2 - 12.5
Net gain on dispositions 4.1 (13.1) - - (9.0)
Interest expense 32.7 (1.5) 22.3 - 53.5
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries (62.8) - - 62.8 -
Corporate allocations (25.6) 25.6 - - -
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
(50.2) 2,061.3 500.1 (208.6) 2,302.6
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Earnings (loss) before taxes 50.2 95.4 3.1 (62.8) 85.9
Provision for taxes 7.9 (31.5) (8.4) - (32.0)
Minority interests - - 5.1 - 5.1
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates 0.2 1.3 (2.2) - (0.7)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net earnings (loss) 58.3 65.2 (2.4) (62.8) 58.3
Preferred dividends, net of tax (2.8) - - - (2.8)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Earnings (loss) attributable to common
shareholders $ 55.5 $ 65.2 $ (2.4) $ (62.8) $ 55.5
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings (loss) $ 104.2 $ 117.0 $ 2.4 $ (119.4) $ 104.2
Noncash charges to net earnings:
Depreciation and amortization 3.0 130.1 29.8 - 162.9
Deferred income taxes 8.0 24.6 1.7 - 34.3
Equity earnings of subsidiaries (119.4) - - 119.4 -
Other, net 21.4 (15.3) - - 6.1
Changes in working capital
components (94.7) 94.8 (1.6) - (1.5)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities (77.5) 351.2 32.3 - 306.0
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to property, plant and
equipment (1.1) (95.1) (10.8) - (107.0)
Investments in and advances to
affiliates 238.5 (275.0) 36.5 - -
Other, net 4.6 5.4 4.3 - 14.3
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 242.0 (364.7) 30.0 - (92.7)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash flows from financing activities
Long-term borrowings - 13.9 9.2 - 23.1
Repayments of long-term borrowings (102.0) (0.4) (58.6) - (161.0)
Change in short-term borrowings - - (13.2) - (13.2)
Common and preferred dividends (22.5) - - - (22.5)
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under various employee and
shareholder plans 36.8 - - - 36.8
Acquisitions of treasury stock (72.3) - - - (72.3)
Other, net (2.5) (0.3) 0.4 - (2.4)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities (162.5) 13.2 (62.2) - (211.5)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net change in cash and temporary
investments 2.0 (0.3) 0.1 - 1.8
Cash and temporary investments -
beginning of year 11.6 0.5 21.9 - 34.0
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash and temporary investments -
end of year $ 13.6 $ 0.2 $ 22.0 $ - $ 35.8
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings (loss) $ 16.6 $ 72.9 $ (57.8) $ (15.1) $ 16.6
Noncash charges to net earnings:
Depreciation and amortization 4.2 108.6 32.2 - 145.0
Headquarters relocation, plant
closures, dispositions and
other costs 4.7 - 56.2 - 60.9
Extraordinary loss from early debt
extinguishment 2.0 17.9 - - 19.9
Equity earnings of subsidiaries (15.1) - - 15.1 -
Other, net (18.6) 16.6 (12.8) - (14.8)
Changes in working capital
components, excluding effects of
acquisitions 25.0 119.6 14.9 - 159.5
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 18.8 335.6 32.7 - 387.1
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to property, plant and
equipment (3.3) (68.7) (12.2) - (84.2)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (15.5) (822.9) - - (838.4)
Investments in and advances to
affiliates, net (948.2) 895.3 50.7 - (2.2)
Intercompany capital contributions
and transactions (75.5) - 75.5 - -
Other, net (5.0) 2.7 12.0 - 9.7
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities (1,047.5) 6.4 126.0 - (915.1)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash flows from financing activities
Long-term borrowings 1,310.0 0.4 - 1,310.4
Repayments of long-term borrowings (130.3) (323.2) (34.3) - (487.8)
Debt issuance costs (28.9) - - (28.9)
Debt prepayment costs - (17.5) - (17.5)
Change in short-term borrowings (85.5) - (117.8) - (203.3)
Common and preferred dividends (22.7) - - - (22.7)
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under various employee and
shareholder plans 31.5 - - - 31.5
Acquisitions of treasury stock (34.9) - - - (34.9)
Other, net (3.1) (1.7) (5.5) - (10.3)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities 1,036.1 (342.0) (157.6) - 536.5
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net change in cash and temporary
investments 7.4 - 1.1 - 8.5
Cash and temporary investments -
beginning of year 4.2 0.5 20.8 - 25.5
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash and temporary investments -
end of year $ 11.6 $ 0.5 $ 21.9 $ - $ 34.0
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Year Ended December 31, 1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball Guarantor Non-Guarantor Eliminating Consolidated
Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Adjustments Total
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings (loss) $ 58.3 $ 65.2 $ (2.4) $ (62.8) $ 58.3
Noncash charges to net earnings:
Depreciation and amortization 1.2 86.3 30.0 - 117.5
Dispositions and other 4.1 (13.1) - - (9.0)
Equity earnings of subsidiaries (62.8) - - 62.8 -
Other, net (0.7) 19.0 1.0 - 19.3
Changes in working capital
components, excluding effect of
acquisitions 20.3 (60.2) (2.7) - (42.6)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 20.4 97.2 25.9 - 143.5
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to property, plant and
equipment (2.3) (62.0) (33.4) - (97.7)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired - (42.7) (160.0) - (202.7)
Investments in and advances to
affiliates, net 0.7 - (11.9) - (11.2)
Intercompany capital contributions
and transactions (252.4) 37.2 215.2 - -
Proceeds from sale of other
businesses, net - 31.1 - - 31.1
Other, net 27.8 (10.7) 12.5 - 29.6
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities (226.2) (47.1) 22.4 - (250.9)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash flows from financing activities
Net change in long-term debt (0.8) (50.0) (23.7) - (74.5)
Net change in short-term debt 85.5 - (13.5) - 72.0
Common and preferred dividends (22.9) - - - (22.9)
Net proceeds from issuance of common
stock under various employee and
shareholder plans 21.7 - - - 21.7
Acquisitions of treasury stock (32.1) - - - (32.1)
Other, net (1.0) (0.1) 0.6 - (0.5)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities 50.4 (50.1) (36.6) - (36.3)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net change in cash and temporary
investments (155.4) - 11.7 - (143.7)
Cash and temporary investments -
beginning of year 159.6 0.5 9.1 - 169.2
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cash and temporary investments -
end of year $ 4.2 $ 0.5 $ 20.8 $ - $ 25.5
=============== =============== =============== =============== ===============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
10. Financial and Derivative Instruments and Risk Management
The Company is subject to various risks and uncertainties due to the competitive
nature of the industries in which it participates, its operations in developing
markets outside the U.S., changing commodity prices and changing capital
markets.
Policies and Procedures
In the ordinary course of business, the Company employs established risk
management policies and procedures to reduce its exposure to commodity price
changes, changes in interest rates, fluctuations in foreign currencies and the
Company's common share repurchase program. The Company's objective in managing
its exposure to commodity price changes is to limit the impact of raw material
price changes on earnings and cash flow through arrangements with customers and
suppliers and, at times, through the use of certain derivative instruments such
as options and forward contracts designated as hedges. The Company's objective
in managing its exposure to interest rate changes is to limit the impact of
interest rate changes on earnings and cash flow and to lower its overall
borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, the Company primarily uses
interest rate swaps, collars and options to manage the Company's mix of floating
and fixed-rate debt between a minimum and maximum percentage, which is set by
policy. The Company's objective in managing its exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations is to protect foreign cash flow and reduce earnings volatility
associated with foreign exchange rate changes.
Unrealized losses on foreign exchange forward contracts are recorded in the
balance sheet as other current liabilities. Realized gains/losses from hedges
are classified in the income statement consistent with accounting treatment of
the item being hedged. The Company accrues the differential for interest rate
swaps to be paid or received under these agreements as adjustments to interest
expense over the lives of the swaps. Gains and losses upon the early termination
of swap agreements are deferred in long-term liabilities and amortized as an
adjustment to interest expense over the remaining term of the agreement.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company primarily manages the commodity price risk in connection with market
price fluctuations of aluminum by entering into customer sales contracts for
cans and ends which include aluminum-based pricing terms which consider price
fluctuations under its commercial supply contracts for aluminum purchases. The
terms include "band" pricing where there is an upper and lower limit, a fixed
price or only an upper limit to the aluminum component pricing. This matched
pricing affects substantially all of our North American metal beverage packaging
net sales. The Company also, at times, uses certain derivative instruments such
as option and forward contracts to hedge commodity price risk. At December 31,
1999, the Company had aluminum forward contracts with notional amounts of
$163 million hedging the aluminum in the fixed price sales contracts. Forward
contract agreements expire in less than one year and up to two years. The fair
value of these contracts at December 31, 1999, was $2.1 million. At December 31,
1998, the Company did not have any outstanding commodity option or forward
contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate instruments held by the Company at December 31, 1999, and 1998,
included pay-floating and pay-fixed interest rate swaps, interest rate collars
and swaption contracts. Pay-fixed swaps effectively convert floating rate
obligations to fixed-rate instruments. Pay-floating swaps effectively convert
fixed-rate obligations to variable-rate instruments. Swap agreements expire in
one to six years.
Interest rate swap agreements outstanding at December 31, 1999, had
notional amounts of $10 million at a floating rate and $475 million at a fixed
rate, or a net fixed position of $465 million. At December 31, 1998, these
agreements had notional amounts of $10 million at a floating rate and
$528 million at a fixed rate, or a net fixed-rate position of $518 million. The
Company also entered into an interest rate collar agreement in 1998 with a
notional amount of $100 million.
The related notional amounts of interest rate swaps and options serve as
the basis for computing the cash flow under these agreements, but do not
represent the Company's exposure through its use of these instruments. Although
these instruments involve varying degrees of credit and interest risk, the
counterparties to the agreements involve financial institutions which are
expected to perform fully under the terms of the agreements.
The fair value of all non-derivative financial instruments approximates
their carrying amounts with the exception of long-term debt. Rates currently
available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities are used to
estimate the fair value of long-term debt based on discounted cash flows. The
fair value of derivatives generally reflects the estimated amounts that Ball
would pay or receive upon termination of the contracts at December 31, 1999, and
1998, taking into account any unrealized gains and losses on open contracts.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
----------------------------- -----------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
($ in millions) Amount Value Amount Value
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Long-term debt $1,139.5 $1,124.6 $1,286.0 $1,280.1
Unrealized net gain (loss) on derivative
contracts relating to debt - 8.0 - (1.5)
</TABLE>
Exchange Rate Risk
The Company's foreign currency risk exposure results from fluctuating currency
exchange rates, primarily the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Hong
Kong dollar, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi, Thai baht and Brazilian real.
The Company faces currency exposure that arises from translating the results of
its global operations and maintaining U.S. dollar debt and payables. The Company
uses forward contracts to manage its foreign currency exposures, and, as a
result, gains and losses on these derivative positions offset, in part, the
impact of currency fluctuations on the existing assets and liabilities. At
December 31, 1999, the notional amount of the Company's foreign exchange risk
management contracts, net of notional amounts of contracts with counterparties
against which the Company has the legal right of offset, was $60 million. The
fair value of these contracts as of December 31, 1999, was $(0.8) million.
In January 1999 the Brazilian government changed its monetary policy,
causing the Brazilian real to devalue. The after-tax effect of the currency
devaluation did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated
earnings. However, the Brazilian real continues to be volatile, and actual
results may differ based on future events.
In early July 1997, the government of Thailand changed its monetary policy
to no longer peg the Thai baht to the U.S. dollar. As a result, the Company
recorded a loss that year of $3.2 million, or 11 cents per share, comprised
primarily of the unrealized loss attributable to approximately $23 million of
U.S. dollar-denominated debt held by its 40 percent equity affiliate in
Thailand.
Equity
In connection with the Company's common share repurchase program, the Company
sells put options which give the purchaser of those options the right to sell
shares of the Company's common stock to the Company on specified dates at
specified prices upon the exercise of those options. The put option contracts
allow the Company to determine the method of settlement - cash or shares. As
such, the contracts are considered equity instruments, and changes in the fair
value are not recognized in the Company's financial statements. The Company's
objective in selling put options is to lower the average purchase price of
acquired shares in connection with the share repurchase program. During 1999 the
Company received $1.3 million in premiums for these options. The premiums are
shown as a reduction in treasury stock. As of December 31, 1999, there were put
options outstanding for 200,000 shares, with strike prices ranging from $41 to
$46.97 (the weighted average strike price was $44.77).
11. Leases
The Company leases warehousing and manufacturing space and certain manufacturing
equipment, primarily within the packaging segment, and office space, primarily
within the aerospace and technologies segment. Under certain of these lease
arrangements, Ball has the option to purchase the leased facilities and
equipment for a total purchase price at the end of the lease term of
approximately $96.3 million. If the Company elects not to purchase the
facilities and equipment and does not enter into a new lease arrangement, Ball
has guaranteed the lessors a minimum residual value of approximately
$77.2 million and may incur other incremental costs to discontinue or relocate
the business activities associated with these leased assets. These agreements
contain certain restrictions relating to dividends, investments and borrowings.
Total noncancellable operating leases in effect at December 31, 1999, require
rental payments of $40.7 million, $33.8 million, $16.3 million, $10.8 million
and $8.4 million for the years 2000 through 2004, respectively, and
$15.9 million combined for all years thereafter. Lease expense for all operating
leases was $44.8 million, $38.5 million and $34.7 million in 1999, 1998 and
1997, respectively.
12. Taxes on Income
The amounts of earnings (losses) before income taxes by national jurisdiction
follow:
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ----------
U.S. $161.5 $ 89.6 $ 82.4
Foreign 9.7 (62.3) 3.5
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 171.2 $ 27.3 $ 85.9
========== ========== ===========
<PAGE>
The provision for income tax expense (benefit) was as follows:
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ----------
Current
U.S. $ 23.5 $ 7.6 $ 9.3
State and local 2.2 2.8 2.2
Foreign 4.9 6.0 3.4
---------- ---------- ----------
Total current 30.6 16.4 14.9
---------- ---------- ----------
Deferred
U.S. 28.7 (8.1) 10.6
State and local 4.6 (1.6) 2.2
Foreign 1.0 2.1 4.3
---------- ---------- ----------
Total deferred 34.3 (7.6) 17.1
---------- ---------- ----------
Provision for income taxes $ 64.9 $ 8.8 $ 32.0
========== ========== ==========
The provision for income taxes recorded within the consolidated statement
of earnings differs from the amount of income tax expense determined by applying
the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to pretax earnings as a result of the
following:
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ----------
Statutory U.S. federal income tax $ 59.9 $ 9.6 $ 30.1
Increase (decrease) due to:
Company-owned life insurance (2.1) (5.2) (6.2)
Research and development tax
credits (3.0) (2.9) (2.5)
Tax effects of foreign operations
and royalty income 2.9 9.4 8.0
State and local income taxes, net 4.4 0.8 2.9
Other, net 2.8 (2.9) (0.3)
---------- ---------- ----------
Provision for income tax expense $ 64.9 $ 8.8 $ 32.0
========== ========== ==========
Effective income tax rate expressed
as a percentage of pretax earnings 37.9% 32.2% 37.2%
========== ========== ==========
Effective in 1999 the Company elected to treat certain investments in the
PRC as partnerships for U.S. tax purposes, resulting in an estimated capital
loss, for tax purposes, of $65 million with a potential tax benefit of
$25 million. As a result of the Company's existing net capital loss position,
and considering currently determinable carryback and carryforward opportunities,
a tax valuation allowance of $21.6 million has been recognized. At December 31,
1999, the Company has alternative minimum tax credits of $12.8 million which may
be carried forward indefinitely.
Provision has not been made for additional U.S. or foreign taxes on
undistributed earnings of controlled foreign corporations where such earnings
will continue to be reinvested. It is not practicable to estimate the additional
taxes, including applicable foreign withholding taxes, that might become payable
upon the eventual remittance of the foreign earnings for which no provision has
been made.
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at
December 31 were:
($ in millions) 1999 1998
------------ ------------
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred compensation $ (28.3) $ (23.7)
Accrued employee benefits (62.2) (58.0)
Plant closure costs (31.6) (37.6)
Other (48.0) (58.0)
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax assets (170.1) (177.3)
------------ ------------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation 121.6 114.9
Other 36.2 20.6
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax liabilities 157.8 135.5
------------ ------------
Net deferred tax asset $ (12.3) $ (41.8)
============ ============
Net income tax payments were $29.6 million, $20.5 million and $4.2 million
for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
<PAGE>
13. Pension and Other Postretirement and Postemployment Benefits
The Company's noncontributory pension plans cover substantially all U.S. and
Canadian employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The defined benefit
plans for salaried employees provide pension benefits based on employee
compensation and years of service. In addition, the plan covering salaried
employees in Canada includes a defined contribution feature. Plans for hourly
employees provide benefits based on fixed rates for each year of service. Ball's
policy is to fund the plans on a current basis to the extent deductible under
existing tax laws and regulations and in amounts sufficient to satisfy statutory
funding requirements. Plan assets consist primarily of common stocks and fixed
income securities.
The Company sponsors defined benefit and defined contribution
postretirement health care and life insurance plans for substantially all U.S.
and Canadian employees. Employees may also qualify for long-term disability,
medical and life insurance continuation and other postemployment benefits upon
termination of active employment prior to retirement. All of the Ball-sponsored
plans are unfunded and, with the exception of life insurance benefits, are
self-insured.
In Canada, the Company provides supplemental medical and other benefits in
conjunction with Canadian Provincial health care plans. Most U.S. salaried
employees who retired prior to 1993 are covered by noncontributory defined
benefit medical plans with capped lifetime benefits. Ball provides a fixed
subsidy toward each retiree's future purchase of medical insurance for U.S.
salaried and substantially all nonunion hourly employees retiring after
January 1, 1993. Life insurance benefits are noncontributory. Ball has no
commitments to increase benefits provided by any of the postretirement benefit
plans.
An analysis of the change in benefit accruals for 1999 and 1998 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Other Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
---------------------------- ----------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 422.1 $ 336.6 $ 91.7 $ 60.4
Service cost 14.2 10.5 1.7 1.0
Interest cost 29.1 26.1 6.5 4.9
Benefits paid (13.1) (20.8) (4.1) (3.0)
Net actuarial (gain) loss (46.0) 29.1 (5.6) (1.9)
Business acquisition 2.6 42.7 2.4 31.4
Other, net 9.4 (2.1) 4.7 (1.1)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Benefit obligation at end of year 418.3 422.1 97.3 91.7
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of assets at beginning of year 419.2 364.3 - -
Actual return on plan assets 12.9 51.6 - -
Employer contributions 25.1 13.7 4.0 2.9
Benefits paid (25.7) (20.8) (4.1) (3.0)
Business acquisition - 14.6 - -
Other, net 3.8 (4.2) 0.1 0.1
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Fair value of assets at end of year 435.3 419.2 - -
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Funded status 17.0 (2.9) (97.3) (91.7)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain) 8.1 18.0 (7.8) (2.8)
Unrecognized prior service cost 12.7 8.3 4.3 0.7
Unrecognized transition asset (3.7) (6.7) - -
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost $ 34.1 $ 16.7 $(100.8) $ (93.8)
============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of:
<TABLE>
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
---------------------------- ----------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Prepaid benefit cost $ 55.2 $ 46.4 $ - $ -
Accrued benefit liability (33.7) (40.8) (100.8) (93.8)
Intangible asset 9.3 6.6 - -
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings 3.3 4.5 - -
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net amount recognized $ 34.1 $ 16.7 $(100.8) $ (93.8)
============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Components of net periodic benefit cost were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
-------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service Cost $ 14.2 $ 10.5 $ 8.3 $ 1.7 $ 1.0 $ 0.5
Interest Cost 29.1 26.1 24.1 6.5 4.9 4.4
Expected return on plan assets (37.6) (35.5) (32.4) - - -
Amortization of prior service cost 1.1 1.1 0.9 - - -
Amortization of transition asset (3.2) (3.2) (3.2) - - -
Curtailment loss 0.5 - - - - -
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) 1.7 1.3 0.8 (0.3) (0.3) (0.1)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net periodic benefit cost 5.8 0.3 (1.5) 7.9 5.6 4.8
Expense of defined contribution plans 0.7 0.6 0.6 - - -
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net periodic benefit cost $ 6.5 $ 0.9 $ (0.9) $ 7.9 $ 5.6 $ 4.8
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
Weighted average assumptions at December 31 were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
-------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Discount rate 7.84% 7.00% 7.50% 7.82% 7.00% 7.50%
Rate of compensation increase 3.33% 3.33% 4.00% N/A N/A N/A
Expected long-term rates of return on
assets 9.82% 10.79% 10.79% N/A N/A N/A
</TABLE>
The expected long-term rates of return on assets are calculated by applying
the expected rate of return to a market related value of plan assets at the
beginning of the year, adjusted for the weighted average expected contributions
and benefit payments. The market related value of plan assets used to calculate
the expected return on plan assets was $382.8 million, $329.5 million and
$300.4 million for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
For pension plans, accumulated gains and losses in excess of a 10 percent
corridor, the prior service cost and the transition asset are being amortized on
a straight-line basis from the date recognized over the average remaining
service period of active participants. For other postretirement benefits, the
10 percent corridor is not used for accumulated actuarial gains and losses, and
they are amortized over 10 years.
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair
value of plan assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations
in excess of plan assets were $136.4 million, $135.3 million and $105.2 million,
respectively, as of December 31, 1999.
For the U.S. and Canadian plans at December 31, 1999, net health care cost
trend rates of 6 percent and 7.5 percent, respectively, were used for pre-65
benefits and 5.5 percent and 7.5 percent, respectively, were used for post-65
benefits for 2000. Trend rates for U.S. plans were assumed to decrease to
5.5 percent by 2001 for pre-65 benefits and for post-65 benefits remain at
5.5 percent in subsequent years. Trend rates for Canadian plans for pre-65 and
post-65 benefits were assumed to decrease to 3.5 percent by 2004 and remain at
this level in subsequent years.
Assumed health care cost trend rates can have a significant effect on the
amounts reported for the health care plan. A one percentage point change in
assumed health care cost trend rates would increase or decrease the total of
service and interest cost by approximately $0.2 million and the postretirement
benefit obligation by approximately $3.4 million.
The additional minimum pension liability, less related intangible asset,
was recognized net of tax benefits as a component of shareholders' equity within
accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Other Benefit Plans
Effective January 1, 1996, substantially all employees within the Company's
aerospace and technologies segment who participate in Ball's 401(k) salary
conversion plan receive a performance-based matching cash contribution of up to
4 percent of base salary. Ball did not record any compensation related to this
match in 1999, but did record $1.6 million and $4.1 million in compensation
expense in 1998 and 1997, respectively. In addition, substantially all U.S.
salaried employees and certain U.S. nonunion hourly employees who participate in
Ball's 401(k) salary conversion plan automatically participate in the Company's
ESOP through an employer matching contribution. Cash contributions to the ESOP
trust, including preferred dividends, are used to service the ESOP debt and were
$11.6 million in 1999, $10.7 million in 1998 and $10.6 million in 1997. Interest
paid by the ESOP trust for its borrowings was $2.6 million, $3.3 million and
$3.6 million for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
<PAGE>
14. Shareholders' Equity
At December 31, 1999, the Company had 120 million shares of common stock and
15 million shares of preferred stock authorized, both without par value.
Preferred stock includes 600,000 authorized but unissued shares designated as
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and 2,100,000 authorized shares
designated as Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock (ESOP Preferred).
The ESOP Preferred has a stated value and liquidation preference of $36.75
per share and cumulative annual dividends of $2.76 per share. The ESOP Preferred
shares are entitled to 1.3 votes per share and are voted with common shares as a
single class upon matters submitted to a vote of Ball's shareholders. Each ESOP
Preferred share has a guaranteed value of $36.75 and is convertible into
1.1552 shares of Ball Corporation common stock.
Under the Company's successor Shareholder Rights Plan, effective August
1997, one Preferred Stock Purchase Right (Right) is attached to each outstanding
share of Ball Corporation common stock. Subject to adjustment, each Right
entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth
of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company at an
exercise price of $130 per Right. If a person or group acquires 15 percent or
more of the Company's outstanding common stock (or upon occurrence of certain
other events), the Rights (other than those held by the acquiring person) become
exercisable and generally entitle the holder to purchase shares of Ball
Corporation common stock at a 50 percent discount. The Rights, which expire in
2006, are redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of one cent per Right
and trade with the common stock. Exercise of such Rights would cause substantial
dilution to a person or group attempting to acquire control of the Company
without the approval of Ball's board of directors. The Rights would not
interfere with any merger or other business combinations approved by the board
of directors.
Common shares were reserved at December 31, 1999, for future issuance under
the employee stock purchase, stock option, dividend reinvestment and restricted
stock plans, as well as to meet conversion requirements of the ESOP Preferred.
In connection with the employee stock purchase plan, the Company
contributes 20 percent of up to $500 of each participating employee's monthly
payroll deduction toward the purchase of the Company's common stock. Company
contributions for this plan were approximately $1.8 million in 1999,
$1.6 million in 1998 and $1.5 million in 1997.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The activity related to accumulated other comprehensive loss was as follows:
Minimum Accumulated
Foreign Pension Other
Currency Liability Comprehensive
($ in millions) Translation (net of tax) Loss
------------- ------------- -------------
December 31, 1996 $ (18.3) $ (2.4) $ (20.7)
1997 Change (2.6) 0.5 (2.1)
------------- ------------- -------------
December 31, 1997 (20.9) (1.9) (22.8)
1998 Change (7.7) (1.2) (8.9)
------------- ------------- -------------
December 31, 1998 (28.6) (3.1) (31.7)
1999 Change 4.0 1.0 5.0
------------- ------------- -------------
December 31, 1999 $ (24.6) $ (2.1) $ (26.7)
============= ============= =============
The minimum pension liability component of other comprehensive earnings
(loss) is presented net of related tax expense (benefit) of $0.7 million,
$(0.4) million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997, respectively. No tax benefit has been provided on the foreign currency
translation loss component for any period, as the undistributed earnings of the
Company's foreign investments will continue to be reinvested.
Stock Options and Restricted Shares
The Company has several stock option plans under which options to purchase
shares of common stock have been granted to officers and key employees of Ball
at the market value of the stock at the date of grant. Payment must be made at
the time of exercise in cash or with shares of stock owned by the option holder,
which are valued at fair market value on the date exercised. Options terminate
10 years from date of grant. Tier A options are exercisable in four equal
installments commencing one year from date of grant, with the exception of
certain Tier A options granted in 1998, which become exercisable after the
Company's common stock price reaches specified prices for 10 consecutive days,
or at the end of five years, whichever comes first. Tier B options vested at the
date of grant, and were exercisable after the Company's common stock price
closed at or above a target price of $50 per share for 10 consecutive days,
which occurred in April 1999. Approximately $4.7 million was recorded as
compensation expense in the second quarter of 1999 in connection with the Tier B
options becoming exercisable, and common stock was increased accordingly. The
target stock price was adjusted based on a compounded annual growth rate of
7.5 percent for individuals retiring prior to the options becoming exercisable.
<PAGE>
The Company also granted 130,000 shares of restricted stock to certain
management employees during 1998 at a price of $35 per share. Restrictions on
these shares lapse in tranches based on the Company achieving certain standards
of performance or at the end of seven years, whichever comes first.
A summary of stock option activity for the years ended December 31 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Number of Exercise Number of Exercise Number of Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at beginning of
year 2,163,396 $30.884 1,754,298 $27.223 1,801,074 $27.222
Tier A options exercised (394,283) 29.626 (332,594) 26.981 (219,750) 26.002
Tier B options exercised (55,500) 24.375 (38,000) 24.375 (20,000) 24.375
Tier A options granted 301,100 53.861 822,300 36.738 306,000 26.592
Tier B options granted - - - - 15,000 25.625
Tier A options canceled (87,918) 36.633 (42,608) 29.378 (113,026) 28.542
Tier B options canceled - - - - (15,000) 24.375
------------ ------------ ------------
Outstanding at end of year 1,926,795 34.657 2,163,396 30.884 1,754,298 27.223
------------ ------------ ------------
Exercisable at end of year 1,087,045 29.955 743,671 28.555 855,923 28.120
------------ ------------ ------------
Reserved for future grants 2,128,130 2,360,056 3,295,948
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
Additional information regarding options outstanding at December 31, 1999,
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exercise Price Range
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$24.375 - $26.375 $26.625 - $35.000 $35.625 - $55.125 Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Number of options outstanding 500,399 597,376 829,020 1,926,795
Weighted average exercise price $ 24.862 $ 30.941 $ 43.248 $ 34.657
Weighted average remaining contractual
life 5.7 years 7.0 years 8.2 years 7.2 years
Number of shares exercisable 445,024 403,376 238,645 1,087,045
Weighted average exercise price $ 24.908 $ 31.511 $ 36.737 $ 29.955
</TABLE>
These options cannot be traded in any equity market. However, based on the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, adapted for use in valuing compensatory
stock options in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Tier A options granted in 1999,
1998 and 1997 have estimated weighted average fair values at the date of grant
of $17.32 per share, $10.73 per share and $7.06 per share, respectively. Under
the same methodology, Tier B options granted during 1997 have an estimated
weighted average fair value at the date of grant of $8.54 per share. The actual
value an employee may realize will depend on the excess of the stock price over
the exercise price on the date the option is exercised. Consequently, there is
no assurance that the value realized by an employee will be at or near the value
estimated. The fair values were estimated using the following weighted average
assumptions:
1999 Grants 1998 Grants 1997 Grants
----------- ----------- -----------
Expected dividend yield 1.52% 1.31% 2.33%
Expected stock price volatility 29.80% 25.34% 23.32%
Risk-free interest rate 5.34% 5.21% 6.75%
Expected life of options 5.5 years 5.3 years 5.12 years
<PAGE>
Ball accounts for its stock-based employee compensation programs using the
intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees." If Ball had elected to recognize compensation based upon
the calculated fair value of the options granted after 1994, pro forma net
earnings and earnings per share would have been:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
As reported:
Net earnings $ 104.2 $ 16.6 $ 58.3
Earnings per common share 3.36 0.45 1.84
Diluted earnings per share 3.15 0.44 1.74
Pro forma results:
Net earnings $ 100.6 $ 14.3 $ 57.0
Earnings per common share 3.24 0.38 1.79
Diluted earnings per share 3.04 0.37 1.70
</TABLE>
15. Earnings per Share
The following table provides additional information on the computation of
earnings per share amounts.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings per Common Share
Earnings before extraordinary item and accounting change $ 104.2 $ 32.0 $ 58.3
Extraordinary loss from early debt extinguishment, net of tax - (12.1) -
Cumulative effect of accounting change for start-up costs,
net of tax - (3.3) -
-------- -------- --------
Net earnings 104.2 16.6 58.3
Preferred dividends, net of tax (2.7) (2.8) (2.8)
-------- -------- --------
Earnings attributable to common shareholders $ 101.5 $ 13.8 $ 55.5
======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares (000s) 30,170 30,388 30,234
======== ======== ========
Earnings per common share:
Earnings before extraordinary item and accounting change $ 3.36 $ 0.96 $ 1.84
Extraordinary loss, net of tax - (0.40) -
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax - (0.11) -
-------- -------- --------
Earnings per common share $ 3.36 $ 0.45 $ 1.84
======== ======== ========
Diluted Earnings per Share
Earnings before extraordinary item and accounting change $ 104.2 $ 32.0 $ 58.3
Extraordinary loss from early debt extinguishment, net of tax - (12.1) -
Cumulative effect of accounting change for start-up costs,
net of tax - (3.3) -
-------- -------- --------
Net earnings 104.2 16.6 58.3
Adjustments for deemed ESOP cash contribution
in lieu of the ESOP Preferred dividend (2.0) (2.1) (2.1)
-------- -------- --------
Adjusted earnings attributable to common shareholders $ 102.2 $ 14.5 $ 56.2
======== ======== ========
Weighted average common shares (000s) 30,170 30,388 30,234
Effect of dilutive securities:
Dilutive effect of stock options 476 338 165
Common shares issuable upon conversion of the ESOP
Preferred stock 1,804 1,866 1,912
-------- -------- --------
Weighted average shares applicable to diluted earnings
per share 32,450 32,592 32,311
======== ======== ========
Diluted earnings per share:
Earnings before extraordinary item and accounting change $ 3.15 $ 0.91 $ 1.74
Extraordinary loss, net of tax - (0.37) -
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax - (0.10) -
-------- -------- --------
Diluted earnings per share $ 3.15 $ 0.44 $ 1.74
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following options have been excluded from the computation of the
diluted earnings per share calculation since they were anti-dilutive (i.e., the
exercise price exceeded the average common stock price for the year):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exercise Price Expiration 1999 1998 1997
- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 32.000 2003 - - 128,000
35.625 2005 - - 194,000
44.313 2008 - 120,000 -
55.125 2009 259,650 - -
Various Various - 4,000 6,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
Total 259,650 124,000 328,000
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
16. Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred in connection with the
Company's internal programs for the development of products and processes. Costs
incurred in connection with these programs amounted to $14 million,
$23.7 million and $22.2 million for the years 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
17. Contingencies
The Company is subject to various risks and uncertainties in the ordinary course
of business due, in part, to the competitive nature of the industries in which
Ball participates, its operations in developing markets outside the U.S.,
changing commodity prices for the materials used in the manufacture of its
products and changing capital markets. Where practicable, the Company attempts
to reduce these risks and uncertainties through the establishment of risk
management policies and procedures, including, at times, the use of certain
derivative financial instruments.
The U.S. government is disputing the Company's claim to recoverability (by
means of allocation to government contracts) of reimbursed costs associated with
Ball's ESOP for fiscal years 1989 through 1995, as well as the corresponding
prospective costs accrued after 1995. The government will not reimburse the
Company for disputed ESOP expenses incurred or accrued after 1995. A deferred
payment agreement for the costs reimbursed through 1995 was entered into between
the government and Ball. On October 10, 1995, the Company filed its complaint
before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) seeking final
adjudication of this matter. Trial before the ASBCA was conducted in January
1997. Since that time, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) has issued a
Draft Audit Report disallowing a portion of the Company's ESOP costs for 1994
through 1997 on the asserted basis that the Company's dividend contributions to
the ESOP do not constitute allowable deferred compensation. The Draft Audit
Report takes the position that the disallowance is not covered by the pending
decision by the ASBCA. However, more recently, Ball's Corporate Administrative
Contracting Officer has resolved the DCAA's disallowance in Ball's favor and has
incorporated this favorable resolution into a Memorandum of Agreement with Ball
to close out cost claims for years 1994 through 1997. While the outcome of the
trial is not yet known, the Company's information at this time does not indicate
that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results
of operations or financial condition of the Company.
From time to time, the Company is subject to routine litigation incident to
its business. Additionally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
designated Ball as a potentially responsible party, along with numerous other
companies, for the cleanup of several hazardous waste sites. However, the
Company's information at this time does not indicate that these matters will
have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or
financial condition of the Company.
18. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
The Company's fiscal quarters end on the Sunday nearest the calendar quarter
end. The fiscal years end on December 31.
1999 Quarterly Information
Fluctuations in sales and earnings for the quarters in 1999 reflected the normal
seasonality of the business as well as the number of days in each fiscal
quarter.
<PAGE>
1998 Quarterly Information
In the first quarter, Ball announced that it would relocate its corporate
headquarters to Broomfield, Colorado. The relocation resulted in total charges
of $17.7 million which were recorded over the course of the year. During the
third quarter, the Company acquired certain assets of the North American
beverage can manufacturing business of Reynolds Metals Company, which
significantly increased Ball's metal beverage container operations in the U.S.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company refinanced approximately
$521.9 million of its debt and, as a result, recorded an after-tax extraordinary
loss from early debt extinguishment of approximately $12.1 million (40 cents per
share). In the fourth quarter, Ball announced its intention to close two of the
acquired plants as well as two plants in the PRC. The closure of the acquired
plants is being accounted for as part of the Acquisition without a charge to
earnings. In connection with the PRC plant closures and related costs, the
Company recorded a pretax charge of approximately $56.2 million ($31.4 million
after tax or $1.03 per share). Also during the fourth quarter, Ball adopted SOP
No. 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities," in advance of its
required 1999 implementation date and, as a result, recorded an after-tax charge
to earnings of approximately $3.3 million (11 cents per share), retroactive to
January 1, 1998, representing the cumulative effect on prior years of this
change in accounting.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
($ in millions except per share amounts) First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999
Net sales $ 820.3 $ 979.0 $ 991.6 $ 793.3 $3,584.2
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Gross profit(1) 94.2 126.7 133.0 104.9 458.8
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net earnings 15.7 32.0 37.0 19.5 104.2
Preferred dividends, net of tax (0.7) (0.7) (0.6) (0.7) (2.7)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Earnings attributable to common shareholders $ 15.0 $ 31.3 $ 36.4 $ 18.8 $ 101.5
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Earnings per common share $ 0.50 $ 1.03 $ 1.21 $ 0.63 $ 3.36
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.47 $ 0.96 $ 1.13 $ 0.59 $ 3.15
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
1998
Net sales $ 549.7 $ 645.6 $ 859.2 $ 841.9 $2,896.4
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Gross profit(1) 58.5 76.8 101.9 97.0 334.2
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary item
and accounting change 5.5 19.2 25.2 (17.9) 32.0
Extraordinary loss from early debt
extinguishment, net of tax - - (12.1) - (12.1)
Cumulative effect of accounting change for
start-up costs, net of tax (3.3) - - - (3.3)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net earnings (loss) 2.2 19.2 13.1 (17.9) 16.6
Preferred dividends, net of tax (0.7) (0.7) (0.7) (0.7) (2.8)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Earnings (loss) attributable to common
shareholders $ 1.5 $ 18.5 $ 12.4 $ (18.6) $ 13.8
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary item
and accounting change $ 0.16 $ 0.61 $ 0.80 $ (0.61) $ 0.96
Extraordinary loss from early debt
extinguishment, net of tax - - (0.40) - (0.40)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
of tax (0.11) - - - (0.11)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.05 $ 0.61 $ 0.40 $ (0.61) $ 0.45
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary item
and accounting change $ 0.15 $ 0.58 $ 0.75 $ (0.61) $ 0.91
Extraordinary loss from early debt
extinguishment, net of tax - - (0.37) - (0.37)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
of tax (0.10) - - - (0.10)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 0.05 $ 0.58 $ 0.38 $ (0.61) $ 0.44
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
(1) Gross profit is shown after depreciation and amortization of $137.4 million
and $136.7 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, and 1998,
respectively.
<PAGE>
Earnings per share calculations for each quarter are based on the weighted
average shares outstanding for that period. As a result, the sum of the
quarterly amounts may not equal the annual earnings per share amount. The
diluted loss per share in the fourth quarter of 1998 is the same as the net loss
per common share because the assumed exercise of stock options and conversion of
the ESOP Preferred stock would have been antidilutive.
Report of Management on Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements contained in this annual report to
shareholders are the responsibility of management. These financial statements
have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
and, necessarily, include certain amounts based on management's informed
judgments and estimates. Future events could affect these judgments and
estimates.
In fulfilling its responsibility for the integrity of financial
information, management maintains and relies upon a system of internal control
which is designated to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded
from unauthorized use or disposition, that transactions are executed in
accordance with management's authorization and that transactions are properly
recorded to permit the preparation of reliable financial statements in all
material respects. To assure the continuing effectiveness of the system of
internal controls and to maintain a climate in which such controls can be
effective, management establishes and communicates appropriate written policies
and procedures; carefully selects, trains and develops qualified personnel;
maintains an organizational structure that provides clearly defined lines of
responsibility, appropriate delegation of authority and segregation of duties;
and maintains a continuous program of internal audits with appropriate
management follow-up. Company policies concerning use of corporate assets and
conflicts of interest, which require employees to maintain the highest ethical
and legal standards in their conduct of the Company's business, are important
elements of the internal control system.
The board of directors oversees management's administration of Company
financial reporting practices, internal controls and the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements through its audit committee, which is composed
entirely of independent directors. The audit committee meets periodically with
representatives of management, Company internal audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP to review the scope and results of audit work, the adequacy of internal
controls and the quality of financial reporting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and
Company internal audit have direct access to the audit committee and the
opportunity to meet the committee without management present to assure a free
discussion of the results of their work and audit findings.
George A. Sissel R. David Hoover
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Vice Chairman, President and Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>
Report of Independent Accountants
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Ball Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, of cash flows and of shareholders' equity
and comprehensive earnings present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Ball Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31,
1999, and 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States which require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for the opinion expressed above.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
January 26, 2000
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Ball Corporation
and subsidiaries are referred to collectively as "Ball" or the "Company" in the
following discussion and analysis.
Overview
Ball significantly increased its North American metal beverage container product
line when it acquired substantially all of the assets of the North American
beverage container operations of Reynolds Metals Company (Acquisition) in the
second half of 1998. In connection with the Acquisition, the Company refinanced
the majority of its outstanding debt, which resulted in an extraordinary charge
in connection with the early extinguishment of that debt. As part of Ball's
comprehensive program to improve earnings, cash flows and operating
efficiencies, the Company closed two of the acquired plants and is in the
process of closing a third. Two plants in the PRC also were closed, and
manufacturing equipment was removed from service at a third plant. Also during
1998 the Company relocated its corporate headquarters to an existing
company-owned building in Colorado.
During 1997 the Company consolidated operations within its North American
metal packaging product lines to reduce costs and increase efficiency,
permanently discontinuing manufacturing operations at three food container
facilities and a Canadian metal beverage container manufacturing facility and
eliminating certain administrative positions within these operations. Ball also
entered the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic container business,
beginning in 1995 with the construction of a pilot line and research and
development center, and currently operates four multi-line manufacturing
facilities.
Acquisitions
On August 10, 1998, Ball acquired substantially all the assets and assumed
certain liabilities of the North American beverage can manufacturing business of
Reynolds Metals Company for approximately $745.4 million, before a refundable
incentive loan of $39 million, a working capital adjustment of an additional
$40.1 million and transaction costs. The assets acquired consisted largely of
16 plants in 12 states and Puerto Rico. The Acquisition has been accounted for
as a purchase, with its results included in the Company's consolidated financial
statements effective with the Acquisition.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company has provided $51.3 million
in the opening balance sheet for certain costs of integrating the acquired
business, including capacity consolidations. The Company finalized its
integration plan during the third quarter of 1999, which includes the closure of
the acquired Richmond, Virginia, headquarters facility in 1998, the closure of
two plants in the first quarter of 1999 and the closure of a third plant which
was phased out, beginning in the fourth quarter of 1999 and concluding in the
first quarter of 2000. Integration costs included $23.3 million for severance,
supplemental unemployment, medical, relocation and other related termination
benefits; $22.8 million for contractual pension and retirement obligations; and
$5.2 million for other plant closure costs. The decrease of $5.5 million from
the previously reported estimate, which was the result of finalizing actuarial
calculations of employee benefit termination costs and refining other exit
costs, has been reflected as a reduction of goodwill. Subsequent increases in
actual costs, if any, will be included in current period earnings, and
decreases, if any, will result in a further reduction of goodwill.
As of December 31, 1999, the Company has made payments of $10.5 million
related to severance, supplemental unemployment, relocation and other
termination costs and $3 million related to other plant closure costs. The
carrying value of the fixed assets held for sale is approximately $21.5 million
at December 31, 1999.
In early 1997 Ball acquired approximately 75 percent of Ball Asia Pacific
Limited, formerly M.C. Packaging (Hong Kong) Limited, for approximately
$179.7 million. During 1998 and 1999, the Company purchased all of the remaining
direct and indirect minority interests in Ball Asia Pacific Limited. In the
third quarter of 1997, the Company acquired certain PET container assets for
approximately $42.7 million from Brunswick Container Corporation.
Dispositions and Other Transactions
In connection with an announcement in December 1998 to close two plants and take
other actions in the PRC, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $56.2 million
($31.4 million after tax or $1.03 per share) as a preliminary estimate of the
related costs to write down to net realizable value certain buildings and
equipment by $22.8 million, goodwill by $15.3 million, inventory by $2.5 million
and machinery spare parts by $3.5 million, as well as $12.1 million for other
assets and related costs. The carrying value of the fixed assets held for sale
is approximately $10 million at December 31, 1999. Also during 1998 the Company
relocated its corporate headquarters to an existing company-owned building in
Broomfield, Colorado, resulting in a pretax charge of $17.7 million
($10.8 million after tax or 36 cents per share).
<PAGE>
In the second quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a pretax charge of
$3 million ($1.8 million after tax or six cents per share) for the closure of a
small PET container manufacturing facility.
Ball sold its equity investment in Datum Inc. (Datum), a time and frequency
measurement device business, in the first half of 1997 for cash of approximately
$26.2 million, resulting in a pretax gain of $11.7 million ($7.1 million after
tax or 23 cents per share). Ball's share of Datum's earnings under the equity
method of accounting was $0.5 million in 1997.
In the fourth quarter of 1997, Ball disposed of or wrote down to estimated
net realizable value certain equity investments, resulting in a net pretax gain
of $0.3 million. The Company's equity in the net earnings of these affiliates
was not significant in 1997.
Consolidated Sales and Earnings
Ball's operations are organized along its product lines and include two segments
- - the packaging segment and the aerospace and technologies segment. The
following table summarizes the results of these two segments:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
($ in millions) 1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales
Packaging $3,201.2 $2,533.8 $1,989.8
Aerospace and technologies 383.0 362.6 398.7
------------ ------------ ------------
Consolidated net sales $3,584.2 $2,896.4 $2,388.5
============ ============ ============
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
Packaging $ 276.7 $ 164.7 $ 108.3
Plant closures, dispositions and other costs - (56.2) (3.0)
------------ ------------ ------------
Total packaging 276.7 108.5 105.3
Aerospace and technologies 24.9 30.4 34.0
------------ ------------ ------------
Consolidated segment operating earnings $ 301.6 $ 138.9 $ 139.3
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Packaging Segment
The packaging segment includes the manufacture and sale of metal and PET
containers for use in beverage and food packaging. The Company's packaging
operations are located in and serve North America (the U.S. and Canada) and Asia
(primarily the PRC). Packaging operations in the U.S. have increased as a result
of a 1998 acquisition, while operations in Asia have also increased as a result
of the early 1997 acquisition of a controlling interest in Ball Asia Pacific
Limited.
Packaging segment sales were up significantly in 1999 compared to 1998
largely as a result of the incremental business from the Acquisition in the
second half of 1998. Segment operating margins increased to 8.6 percent in 1999
from 6.5 percent in 1998 and 5.4 percent in 1997, excluding the effects of plant
closures and disposition costs. The improvement in margins reflects the
increased volume in each line of business, improved production efficiencies and
reduced fixed and variable costs in connection with plant closures in the U.S.
and the PRC.
North American metal beverage can sales, which represented approximately
70 percent of segment sales in 1999, increased approximately 40 percent compared
to 1998, which was higher than 1997 net sales by approximately 45 percent. The
increase in 1999 compared to 1998 primarily was due to the additional sales
volume from the acquired plants, as well as Ball's original plants running at
full capacity, partially offset by the effect on revenues of lower aluminum
commodity prices. The higher sales in 1998 compared to 1997 reflected new
customer commitments and strong soft drink industry demand. Ball's beverage can
shipments increased approximately 42 percent in 1999, primarily as a result of
the Acquisition. Based on publicly available industry information, the Company
estimates that shipments for the metal beverage container product line were
approximately 35 percent of total U.S. and Canadian shipments.
North American metal food container sales, which comprised approximately
16 percent of segment sales in 1999, increased approximately 4 percent over 1998
and 5 percent over 1997. This increase was the result of stronger sales in
seasonal and nonseasonal lines with the Alaskan salmon catch and the harvest and
pack conditions in the Midwest both being better during 1999. For the first
time, shipments from the metal food container product line exceeded five billion
units, which the Company estimates to be approximately 16 percent of total U.S.
and Canadian metal food container shipments in 1999, based on publicly available
industry information.
<PAGE>
Sales in the plastic (PET) container product line have increased steadily
over the three-year period with 1999 exceeding 1998 by approximately 7 percent,
which exceeded 1997 by approximately 43 percent. The increase in 1999 over 1998
largely was due to additional volume from a recently expanded facility while the
increase in 1998 over 1997 included additional sales from new business acquired
in the third quarter of 1997 as well as higher production capacity due to the
first full year of operations of an East Coast plant. While the sales mix in the
plastic container product line continues to be weighted primarily toward
carbonated soft drinks and water, the Company is developing plastic beer bottles
using a multi-layer technology and is introducing this beverage package in
limited markets.
Sales within the international packaging product line in 1999 were
comprised of the sales within the PRC as well as revenues from technical
services to licensees. Sales for this product line decreased approximately
5 percent in 1999 compared to 1998 and approximately 14 percent from 1997. The
closure of two plants in the PRC during the first quarter of 1999 contributed to
the lower sales for the year. Sales within the PRC have been negatively affected
by a soft metal beverage container market combined with industry overcapacity.
Aerospace and Technologies Segment
Sales in the aerospace and technologies segment increased in 1999 in comparison
to 1998 as a result of increased program activity. Earnings results were lower
due largely to costs to develop antennas which employ Ball technology for
wireless personal communications systems. The related sales have not yet been
realized to offset these costs, which were planned as part of the Company's
strategy to extend into commercial markets key technologies it has developed in
governmental business.
The sales reduction in the aerospace and technologies segment from 1997 to
1998 reflects, in large part, reduced activity in connection with certain
government programs and the unusually strong demand in the first half of 1997
for certain telecommunications equipment and related products. Demand for those
products in 1998 returned to more normal levels. The operating earnings decrease
in 1998 reflected the effect of lower sales in 1998 and, by comparison, the
inclusion in the first half of 1997 of one-time early delivery incentives earned
in connection with telecommunications products.
Sales to the U.S. government, either as a prime contractor or as a
subcontractor, represented approximately 86 percent, 90 percent and 87 percent
of segment sales in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Major industry trends
have not changed significantly, with Department of Defense and NASA budgets
remaining relatively flat. However, there is a growing worldwide market for
commercial space activities. Consolidation in the industry continues, and there
is strong competition for business. Backlog for the aerospace and technologies
segment at December 31, 1999, and 1998, was approximately $346 million and
$296 million, respectively. Year-to-year comparisons of backlog are not
necessarily indicative of the trend of future operations.
Interest and Taxes
Interest expense increased to $107.6 million in 1999, compared to $78.6 million
in 1998 and $53.5 million in 1997. The increase in total interest cost in 1999
compared to 1998 was largely attributable to the additional debt associated with
the 1998 Acquisition for a full year.
Ball's consolidated effective income tax rate was 37.9 percent in 1999,
compared to 32.2 percent in 1998 and 37.2 percent in 1997. The higher tax rate
for 1999 compared to 1998 is primarily related to the phase-in effects of the
previously reported 1996 legislated changes in the tax treatment of the costs of
company-owned life insurance, the impact of a full year of goodwill amortization
related to the book and tax basis differences of the assets and liabilities in
the Acquisition and the favorable settlement in 1998 of various issues with
taxing authorities, all of which were partially offset by the net tax effects of
foreign operations. The lower tax rate for 1998 compared to 1997 is largely
attributed to the 1998 settlement of various issues with taxing authorities.
Results of Equity Affiliates
Equity earnings in affiliates are largely attributable to equity investments in
the PRC, Thailand and Brazil. Equity in losses of affiliates was $0.2 million in
1999 compared to equity in earnings of $5.6 million in 1998 and equity in losses
of $0.7 million in 1997. Results in Thailand for 1999 were hampered by slow
domestic sales coupled with the disruption of that business' export sales. The
improved results in 1998 compared to 1997 reflect the effects of the
strengthening of the Thai baht and reduced start-up costs compared to 1997 when
operations of certain affiliates in Brazil, Thailand and the PRC began.
<PAGE>
Other Items
Combined selling and administrative and receivable securitization fees and
product development expenses were $154.5 million, $133.2 million and
$118.6 million for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Higher consolidated
selling and administrative expenses in 1999 and 1998 (for a partial year)
compared to 1997 were due partially to the additional costs associated with the
plants acquired in August 1998, including salaries and interim administrative
support. Also contributing to the increase were higher incentive compensation
costs and, in 1999, a nonrecurring $4.7 million charge in the second quarter
associated with an executive stock option grant which vested in April when the
Company's closing stock price reached specified levels. Common stock was
increased accordingly.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company refinanced approximately
$521.9 million of its existing debt and, as a result, recorded a pretax charge
for early extinguishment of the debt of approximately $19.9 million
($12.1 million after tax or 40 cents per share).
Also, in 1998 the Company adopted SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of
Start-Up Activities," in advance of its required 1999 implementation date. SOP
No. 98-5 requires that costs of start-up activities and organizational costs, as
defined, be expensed as incurred. In accordance with this statement, the Company
recorded an after-tax charge to earnings of approximately $3.3 million (11 cents
per share), retroactive to January 1, 1998, representing the cumulative effect
of this change in accounting on prior years.
Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows from operating activities were $306 million in 1999 compared to
$387.1 million in 1998 and $143.5 million in 1997. The decrease in 1999 from
1998 was largely due to improved operating results and higher collections on
receivables offset by higher inventories, primarily due to purchases of aluminum
late in 1999 in anticipation of a price increase. The increase in 1998 compared
to 1997 resulted primarily from improved operating results in North America and
a reduction in the cash used for working capital.
Capital expenditures, excluding effects of business acquisitions and
dispositions, were $107 million, $84.2 million and $97.7 million in 1999, 1998
and 1997, respectively. Higher spending in 1999 compared to 1998 was primarily
related to the Acquisition. Spending in 1997 included amounts to complete two
new metal packaging plants in the PRC, as well as spending within Ball Asia
Pacific Limited. In 2000 total capital spending and investments are anticipated
to be approximately $150 million.
Debt at December 31, 1999, decreased $159.9 million to $1,196.7 million
from $1,356.6 million at year end 1998, while cash and temporary investments
increased slightly. The reduction in debt was due largely to improved earnings
and cash collections on receivables, partially offset by increased aluminum raw
material inventories. Consolidated debt-to-total capitalization improved to
62.7 percent at December 31, 1999, from 67.7 percent at year end 1998.
In connection with the Acquisition in 1998, the Company refinanced
approximately $521.9 million of its existing debt and, as a result, recorded an
after-tax extraordinary charge from the early extinguishment of debt of
approximately $12.1 million (40 cents per share). The Acquisition and the
refinancing, including related costs, were financed with a placement of
$300 million in 7.75% Senior Notes due in 2006, $250 million in 8.25% Senior
Subordinated Notes due in 2008 and approximately $808.2 million from a Senior
Credit Facility. The Senior Credit Facility bears interest at variable rates and
is comprised of four separate facilities: (1) Term Loan A for $350 million due
in 2004, (2) Term Loan B for $200 million due in 2006, (3) a revolving credit
facility which provides the Company with up to $650 million, comprised of a
$150 million, 364-day annually renewable facility and a $450 million long-term
committed facility expiring in 2004 and (4) a $50 million long-term committed
Canadian facility. At December 31, 1999, approximately $585 million was
available under the revolving credit facilities.
All of the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes were exchanged as of
January 27, 1999. The terms of the new notes are substantially identical in all
respects (including principal amount, interest rate, maturity, ranking and
covenant restrictions) to the terms of the notes for which they were exchanged
except that the new notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and therefore are not subject to certain restrictions on transfer
except as described in the Prospectus for the Exchange Offer. The note
agreements provide that if the new notes are assigned investment grade ratings
and the Company is not in default, certain covenant restrictions will be
suspended.
<PAGE>
The Senior Notes, Senior Subordinated Notes and Senior Credit Facility
agreements are guaranteed on a full, unconditional and joint and several basis
by certain of the Company's domestic wholly owned subsidiaries. All amounts
outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility are secured by (1) a pledge of
100 percent of the stock owned by the Company of its direct and indirect
majority-owned domestic subsidiaries and (2) a pledge of the Company's stock,
owned directly or indirectly, of certain foreign subsidiaries which equals
65 percent of the stock of each such foreign subsidiary. Separate financial
statements for the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries are
not presented because management has determined that such financial statements
would not be material to investors. Condensed, consolidating financial
information for the Company, segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and
non-guarantor subsidiaries, will be provided as a separate exhibit to the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.
Ball's Asian subsidiary and its consolidated affiliates had short-term
uncommitted credit facilities of approximately $113 million, of which
$57.2 million was outstanding at December 31, 1999.
The U.S. note agreements, bank credit agreement, ESOP debt guarantee and
industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions
relating to dividends, investments, guarantees and the incurrence of additional
indebtedness.
A securitization agreement provides for the ongoing, revolving sale of a
designated pool of trade accounts receivable of Ball's U.S. packaging
businesses. In December 1998 the designated pool of receivables was increased to
provide for sales of up to $125 million from the previous amount of $75 million.
Net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled
$122.5 million at both December 31, 1999, and 1998. Fees incurred in connection
with the sale of accounts receivable totaled $7 million in 1999 and $4 million
in each of 1998 and 1997.
Cash dividends paid on common stock in 1999, 1998 and 1997 were 60 cents
per share each year.
Financial and Derivative Instruments and Risk Management
The Company is subject to various risks and uncertainties due to the competitive
nature of the industries in which it participates, its operations in developing
markets outside the U.S., changing commodity prices and changing capital
markets.
Policies and Procedures
In the ordinary course of business, the Company employs established risk
management policies and procedures to reduce its exposure to commodity price
changes, changes in interest rates, fluctuations in foreign currencies and the
Company's common share repurchase program. The Company's objective in managing
its exposure to commodity price changes is to limit the impact of raw material
price changes on earnings and cash flow through arrangements with customers and
suppliers and, at times, through the use of certain derivative instruments such
as options and forward contracts designated as hedges. The Company's objective
in managing its exposure to interest rate changes is to limit the impact of
interest rate changes on earnings and cash flow and to lower its overall
borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, the Company primarily uses
interest rate swaps, collars and options to manage the Company's mix of floating
and fixed-rate debt between a minimum and maximum percentage, which is set by
policy. The Company's objective in managing its exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations is to protect foreign cash flow and reduce earnings volatility
associated with foreign exchange rate changes.
Unrealized losses on foreign exchange forward contracts are recorded in the
balance sheet as other current liabilities. Realized gains/losses from hedges
are classified in the income statement consistent with accounting treatment of
the item being hedged. The Company accrues the differential for interest rate
swaps to be paid or received under these agreements as adjustments to interest
expense over the lives of the swaps. Gains and losses upon the early termination
of swap agreements are deferred in long-term liabilities and amortized as an
adjustment to interest expense over the remaining term of the agreement.
The Company has estimated its market risk exposure using sensitivity
analysis. Market risk exposure has been defined as the changes in fair value of
a derivative instrument assuming a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in
market prices or rates. The results of the sensitivity analysis are summarized
below. Actual changes in market prices or rates may differ from hypothetical
changes.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company primarily manages the commodity price risk in connection with market
price fluctuations of aluminum by entering into customer sales contracts for
cans and ends which include aluminum-based pricing terms which consider price
fluctuations under its commercial supply contracts for aluminum purchases. The
terms include "band" pricing where there is an upper and lower limit, a fixed
price or only an upper limit to the aluminum component pricing. This matched
pricing affects substantially all of the Company's North American metal beverage
packaging net sales. The Company also, at times, uses certain derivative
instruments such as option and forward contracts to hedge commodity price risk.
At December 31, 1999, the Company had aluminum forward contracts with notional
amounts of $163 million hedging the aluminum in the fixed price sales contracts.
Forward contract agreements expire in less than one year and up to two years.
The fair value of these contracts at December 31, 1999, was $2.1 million. At
December 31, 1998, the Company did not have any outstanding commodity option or
forward contracts.
Considering the Company's commodity price exposures and the effects of
derivative instruments, a hypothetical 10 percent change in commodity prices
would not have a material impact on earnings, cash flow or financial position
over a one-year period. Actual changes in market prices may differ from
hypothetical changes.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate instruments held by the Company at December 31, 1999, and 1998,
included pay-floating and pay-fixed interest rate swaps, interest rate collars
and swaption contracts. Pay-fixed swaps effectively convert floating rate
obligations to fixed-rate instruments. Pay-floating swaps effectively convert
fixed-rate obligations to variable-rate instruments. Swap agreements expire in
one to six years.
Interest rate swap agreements outstanding at December 31, 1999, had
notional amounts of $10 million at a floating rate and $475 million at a fixed
rate, or a net fixed position of $465 million. At December 31, 1998, these
agreements had notional amounts of $10 million at a floating rate and
$528 million at a fixed rate, or a net fixed-rate position of $518 million. The
Company also entered into an interest rate collar agreement in 1998 with a
notional amount of $100 million.
The related notional amounts of interest rate swaps and options serve as
the basis for computing the cash flow under these agreements, but do not
represent the Company's exposure through its use of these instruments. Although
these instruments involve varying degrees of credit and interest risk, the
counterparties to the agreements involve financial institutions which are
expected to perform fully under the terms of the agreements.
Based on the Company's interest rate exposure at December 31, 1999, assumed
floating rate debt levels throughout 2000 and the effects of derivative
instruments, a 10 percent change in interest rates could have an estimated
$1.9 million after-tax impact on earnings over a one-year period. Actual results
may vary based on actual changes in market prices and rates. The estimated
impact over a one-year period was $2 million after tax as of December 31, 1998.
The fair value of all non-derivative financial instruments approximates
their carrying amounts with the exception of long-term debt. Rates currently
available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities are used to
estimate the fair value of long-term debt based on discounted cash flows. The
fair value of derivatives generally reflects the estimated amounts that Ball
would pay or receive upon termination of the contracts at December 31, 1999, and
1998, taking into account any unrealized gains and losses on open contracts.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
----------------------------- -----------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
($ in millions) Amount Value Amount Value
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Long-term debt $1,139.5 $1,124.6 $1,286.0 $1,280.1
Unrealized net gain (loss) on derivative
contracts relating to debt - 8.0 - (1.5)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Exchange Rate Risk
The Company's foreign currency risk exposure results from fluctuating currency
exchange rates, primarily the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Hong
Kong dollar, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi, Thai baht and Brazilian real.
The Company faces currency exposure that arises from translating the results of
its global operations and maintaining U.S. dollar debt and payables. The Company
uses forward contracts to manage its foreign currency exposures, and, as a
result, gains and losses on these derivative positions offset, in part, the
impact of currency fluctuations on the existing assets and liabilities. At
December 31, 1999, the notional amount of the Company's foreign exchange risk
management contracts, net of notional amounts of contracts with counterparties
against which the Company has the legal right of offset, was $60 million. The
fair value of these contracts as of December 31, 1999, was $(0.8) million.
Considering the Company's derivative financial instruments outstanding at
December 31, 1999, and the currency exposures, a hypothetical 10 percent
unfavorable change in the exchange rates, compared to the U.S. dollar, could
have an estimated $2 million after-tax detrimental impact on earnings over a
one-year period. Actual changes in market prices or rates may differ from
hypothetical changes. The estimated impact over a one-year period was $3 million
after tax as of December 31, 1998.
In January 1999, the Brazilian government changed its monetary policy,
causing the Brazilian real to devalue. The after-tax effect of the currency
devaluation did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated
earnings. However, the Brazilian real continues to be volatile, and actual
results may differ based on future events.
In early July 1997, the government of Thailand changed its monetary policy
to no longer peg the Thai baht to the U.S. dollar. As a result, the Company
recorded a loss that year of $3.2 million, or 11 cents per share, comprised
primarily of the unrealized loss attributable to approximately $23 million of
U.S. dollar-denominated debt held by its 40 percent equity affiliate in
Thailand.
Equity
In connection with the Company's share repurchase program, the Company sells put
options which give the purchaser of those options the right to sell shares of
the Company's common stock to the Company on specified dates at specified prices
upon the exercise of those options. The put option contracts allow the Company
to determine the method of settlement - cash or shares. As such, the contracts
are considered equity instruments, and changes in the fair value are not
recognized in the Company's financial statements. The Company's objective in
selling put options is to lower the average purchase price of acquired shares in
connection with the share repurchase program. During 1999 the Company received
$1.3 million in premiums for these options. The premiums are shown as a
reduction in treasury stock. As of December 31, 1999, there were put options
outstanding for 200,000 shares, with strike prices ranging from $41 to $46.97
(the weighted average strike price was $44.77).
New Accounting Pronouncements
Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use," establishes new accounting and
reporting standards for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for
internal use and was effective for Ball in 1999. The adoption of SOP No. 98-1
did not have a significant impact on the Company's results on operations or
financial condition in 1999.
During the fourth quarter of 1998, Ball adopted SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on
the Costs of Start-Up Activities," in advance of its required 1999
implementation date. SOP No. 98-5 requires that costs of start-up activities and
organizational costs, as defined, be expensed as incurred. In accordance with
this statement, the Company recorded an after-tax charge to earnings of
approximately $3.3 million (11 cents per share), retroactive to January 1, 1998,
representing the cumulative effect of this change in accounting on prior years.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," essentially requires all
derivatives to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and establishes
new accounting practices for hedge instruments. In June 1999 SFAS No. 137 was
issued to defer the effective date of SFAS No. 133 by one year. As a result,
SFAS No. 133 will not be effective for Ball until 2001. The effect, if any, of
adopting this standard has not yet been determined.
<PAGE>
Contingencies
Year 2000 Systems Review
Prior to January 1, 2000, many computer systems and other equipment with
embedded chips or processors used only two digits to represent the year and, as
a result, there was concern that the computer systems would be unable to process
accurately certain data before, during or after the year 2000. This was commonly
known as the Year 2000 issue which could have arisen at any point in the
company's supply, manufacturing, processing, distribution and financial chains.
As of February 2000, the Company can report that there have been no material
adverse consequences or significant interruptions of normal operations as a
result of Year 2000 problems.
Over the course of the past several years, systems installations, upgrades
and enhancements were performed by the Company in the ordinary course of
business with attention given to Year 2000 matters. As a result, when the formal
Year 2000 program was instituted in 1996, many of the Year 2000 matters
potentially affecting the Company had either been resolved or were near
resolution. The formal program was instituted to make the remaining software and
systems Year 2000 compliant in time to minimize significant negative effects on
operations and was divided into five major phases: (1) project initiation,
(2) awareness, (3) assessment, (4) remediation and (5) testing and
implementation.
The program also was divided into two major efforts: (1) corporate and the
packaging segment (both North America and international) and (2) the aerospace
and technologies segment. Within these two areas, the Company identified certain
information technology systems as significant, which included manufacturing
applications, financial systems, human resources systems, environmental control
systems and quality systems, among others. All phases, including testing, were
completed for all identified significant systems by December 31, 1999.
The Company's foreign technology licensees and 50 percent or less joint
ventures were provided with Ball's formal compliance program and encouraged to
follow the North American procedures.
Because most of the Company's efforts were initiated to address specific
business requirements or to stay technologically current, it was difficult to
quantify costs incurred solely in conjunction with the Year 2000 project.
However, certain incremental costs of approximately $3 million were incurred and
identified, including contractor assistance, the purchase of software to manage
the project and software to check personal computer hardware and software
compliance.
Ball relies on third-party suppliers for raw materials, water, utilities,
transportation, banking and other key services. The possibility of principal
suppliers, including utilities, experiencing Year 2000-related problems could
result in delays in product or service deliveries from such suppliers and
disrupt the Company's ability to supply its products or services. To assess the
risks associated with both customers and vendors not being ready, Ball assigned
each supplier a level of importance (critical, important or not important). The
Company provided "critical" and "important" third parties with questionnaires,
all of which either responded or were interviewed by telephone as of
December 31, 1999. "Critical" third parties were defined as those who are
sole-source suppliers or who most likely would have an impact on Ball's ability
to conduct business if interruptions of supplies occurred for less than
10 days. "Important" third parties were defined as those which would only have
an impact on the Company's ability to conduct business if interruptions of
supplies or services exceeded 10 days.
Based on these procedures, as well as the Company's meetings with its
larger customers, there was no indication that the third parties would not be
Year 2000 compliant. However, neither the U.S. government nor the PRC government
confirmed Year 2000 readiness.
Prior to January 1, 2000, Ball was unable to determine the effect on the
Company of the uncertainty inherent in the Year 2000 issue associated with the
readiness of suppliers and customers. However, as of February 2000, the Company
has not experienced any significant disruptions or adverse consequences related
to supplier or customer preparedness.
The Company developed contingency plans intended to mitigate the possible
disruption of business operations that could result from third-party Year 2000
issues. Such plans include accelerating raw material delivery schedules,
increasing finished goods inventory levels, securing alternate sources of
supply, adjusting facility shutdown and start-up schedules and other appropriate
measures. The Company's contingency planning was completed by the end of 1999.
While it has not been necessary to implement the plans, they can be implemented
should they be required in the future.
A worst-case scenario for the Company with respect to the Year 2000 issue
could have been the failure of either a critical vendor or the Company's
manufacturing and information systems. Such failures could have resulted in
production outages and lost sales and profits. As of February 2000, there have
been no such failures.
<PAGE>
The discussion of the Company's efforts and management's expectations
relating to Year 2000 compliance contains forward-looking statements. The
Company's ability to achieve Year 2000 compliance and the level of associated
incremental costs could be adversely impacted by, among other things, the
possibility of suppliers and customers experiencing Year 2000-related
disruptions, the U.S., PRC and other governments' readiness and unanticipated
problems identified in the ongoing compliance program. However, as of February
2000, the Company does not believe that it will experience any material or
significant interruptions in its normal operations as the result of Year 2000
compliance issues. The Company will continue to monitor and assess its systems
and, where necessary, remediate Year 2000 compliance problems.
The information contained herein regarding the Company's efforts to deal
with the Year 2000 problem applies to all of the Company's products and
services. Such statements are intended as Year 2000 Statements and Year 2000
Readiness Disclosures and are subject to the Year 2000 Information Readiness
Disclosure Act.
Other
The Company is subject to various risks and uncertainties in the ordinary course
of business due, in part, to the competitive nature of the industries in which
Ball participates, its operations in developing markets outside the U.S.,
changing commodity prices for the materials used in the manufacture of its
products and changing capital markets. Where practicable, the Company attempts
to reduce these risks and uncertainties through the establishment of risk
management policies and procedures, including, at times, the use of certain
derivative financial instruments.
The U.S. government is disputing the Company's claim to recoverability (by
means of allocation to government contracts) of reimbursed costs associated with
Ball's ESOP for fiscal years 1989 through 1995, as well as the corresponding
prospective costs accrued after 1995. The government will not reimburse the
Company for disputed ESOP expenses incurred or accrued after 1995. A deferred
payment agreement for the costs reimbursed through 1995 was entered into between
the government and Ball. On October 10, 1995, the Company filed its complaint
before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) seeking final
adjudication of this matter. Trial before the ASBCA was conducted in January
1997. Since that time, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) has issued a
Draft Audit Report disallowing a portion of the Company's ESOP costs for 1994
through 1997 on the asserted basis that the Company's dividend contributions to
the ESOP do not constitute allowable deferred compensation. The Draft Audit
Report takes the position that the disallowance is not covered by the pending
decision by the ASBCA. However, more recently, Ball's Corporate Administrative
Contracting Officer has resolved the DCAA's disallowance in Ball's favor and has
incorporated this favorable resolution into a Memorandum of Agreement with Ball
to close out cost claims for years 1994 through 1997. While the outcome of the
trial is not yet known, the Company's information at this time does not indicate
that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results
of operations or financial condition of the Company.
From time to time, the Company is subject to routine litigation incident to
its business. Additionally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
designated Ball as a potentially responsible party, along with numerous other
companies, for the cleanup of several hazardous waste sites. However, the
Company's information at this time does not indicate that these matters will
have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or
financial condition of the Company.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future
events could affect these estimates.
The U.S. economy and the Company have experienced minor general inflation
during the past several years. Management believes that evaluation of Ball's
performance during the periods covered by these consolidated financial
statements should be based upon historical financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
The Company has made certain forward-looking statements in this annual report
relating to market growth, increases in market shares, total shareholder return,
improved earnings, positive cash flow, technology upgrades and international
market expansion, among others. These forward-looking statements represent the
Company's goals and are based on certain assumptions and estimates regarding the
worldwide economy, specific industry technological innovations, industry
competitive activity, interest rates, capital expenditures, pricing, currency
movements, product introductions, and the development of certain domestic and
international markets. Some factors that could cause the Company's actual
results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, fluctuation in
customer growth and demand; the weather; fuel costs and availability; regulatory
action; federal and state legislation; interest rates; labor strikes; boycotts;
litigation involving antitrust, intellectual property, consumer and other
issues; maintenance and capital expenditures; local economic conditions; the
authorization and control over the availability of government contracts and the
nature and continuation of those contracts and related services provided
thereunder; the success or lack of success of satellite launches and the
businesses and governments associated with the launches; the devaluation of
international currencies; the ability to obtain adequate credit resources for
foreseeable financing requirements of the Company's businesses; the inability of
the Company to achieve Year 2000 readiness; and, the ability of the Company to
acquire other businesses. If the Company's assumptions and estimates are
incorrect, or if it is unable to achieve its goals, then the Company's actual
performance could vary materially from those goals expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Five-Year Review of Selected Financial Data
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
- ------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $3,584.2 $2,896.4 $2,388.5 $2,184.4 $2,045.8
Earnings (loss) from:
Continuing operations (1) 104.2 32.0 58.3 13.1 51.9
Discontinued operations - - - 11.1 (70.5)
Earnings (loss) before cumulative effect
of accounting change 104.2 32.0 58.3 24.2 (18.6)
Extraordinary item, net of tax - (12.1) - - -
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax - (3.3) - - -
Net earnings (loss) (1) 104.2 16.6 58.3 24.2 (18.6)
Preferred dividends, net of tax (2.7) (2.8) (2.8) (2.9) (3.1)
Earnings (loss) attributable to common
shareholders $101.5 $13.8 $55.5 $21.3 $(21.7)
Return on average common shareholders'
equity 16.2% 2.3% 9.3% 3.7% (3.7)%
- ------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Earnings per common share:
Earnings (loss) from:
Continuing operations (1) $3.36 $0.96 $1.84 $0.34 $1.63
Discontinued operations - - - 0.36 (2.35)
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary
item and cumulative effect of
accounting change 3.36 0.96 1.84 0.70 (0.72)
Extraordinary item, net of tax - (0.40) - - -
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax (2) - (0.11) - - -
Earnings (loss) per common share $3.36 $0.45 $1.84 $0.70 $(0.72)
Cash dividends 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Book value 21.97 19.52 20.23 19.22 18.84
Market value 39 3/8 45 3/4 35 3/8 26 1/4 27 3/4
Annual return to common shareholders (3) (12.7)% 31.4% 37.4% (3.2)% (10.2)%
Weighted average common shares
outstanding (000s) 30,170 30,388 30,234 30,314 30,024
- ------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) from: (4)
Continuing operations (1) $3.15 $0.91 $1.74 $0.34 $1.54
Discontinued operations - - - 0.34 (2.18)
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary
item and cumulative effect of
accounting change 3.15 0.91 1.74 0.68 (0.64)
Extraordinary item, net of tax - (0.37) - - -
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax (2) - (0.10) - - -
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $3.15 $0.44 $1.74 $0.68 $(0.64)
Diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding (000s) 32,450 32,592 32,311 32,335 32,312
- ------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Property, plant and equipment additions $107.0 $84.2 $97.7 $196.1 $178.9
Depreciation and amortization 162.9 145.0 117.5 93.5 78.7
Total assets 2,732.1 2,854.8 2,090.1 1,700.8 1,614.0
Total interest bearing debt and capital
lease obligations (5) 1,196.7 1,356.6 773.1 582.9 475.4
Common shareholders' equity 655.2 594.6 611.3 586.7 567.5
Total capitalization (5) 1,907.3 2,003.2 1,459.0 1,194.3 1,064.1
Debt-to-total capitalization (5) 62.7% 67.7% 53.0% 48.8% 44.7%
- ------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
(1) Includes the effect of a change in 1995 to the LIFO method of accounting of
$17.1 million ($10.4 million after tax or 35 cents per share).
(2) See the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) Change in stock price plus dividend yield assuming reinvestment of
dividends.
(4) In 1995, the assumed conversion of preferred stock and exercise of stock
options resulted in a dilutive effect on continuing operations.
Accordingly, the diluted loss per share amounts are required to be used for
discontinued operations, resulting in a lower total loss per share than the
loss per common share.
(5) Includes amounts attributed to discontinued operations.
<PAGE>
Quarterly Stock Prices and Dividends
Quarterly prices for the Company's common stock, as reported on the composite
tape, and quarterly dividends in 1999 and 1998 were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
High 46 15/16 59 1/8 52 7/16 44 1/4 35 11/16 40 15/16 47 15/16 46 1/8
Low 39 1/4 42 1/4 42 9/16 35 3/8 29 13/16 32 3/8 28 5/8 28 15/16
Dividends .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15
</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1
SUBSIDIARY LIST (1)
Ball Corporation and Subsidiaries
The following is a list of subsidiaries of Ball Corporation (an Indiana
Corporation).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
State or Country
of Incorporation Percentage
Name or Organization Ownership (2)
<S> <C> <C>
Ball Capital Corp. Colorado 100%
Ball Packaging Corp. Colorado 100%
Ball Asia Services Limited Colorado 100%
Ball Plastic Container Corp. Colorado 100%
Ball Metal Food Container Corp. Delaware 100%
Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. Colorado 100%
Latas de Aluminio Ball, Inc. Delaware 100%
Ball Metal Packaging Sales Corp. Colorado 100%
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Delaware 100%
Ball Aerospace - (Australia), Pty Ltd. Australia 100%
Ball Systems Technology Limited United Kingdom 100%
Ball Technology Services Corporation California 100%
Ball North America, Inc. Canada 100%
Ball Packaging Products Canada Corp. Canada 100%
Ball Asia Pacific Holdings Limited
(formerly FTB Packaging Limited) Hong Kong 97%
Beijing FTB Packaging Limited PRC 92%
FTB Tooling & Engineering Ltd. Hong Kong 97%
Fully Tech Industrial Ltd. Hong Kong 98%
Greater China Trading Ltd. Cayman Islands 97%
FTB Zhuhai Ends Manufacturing Co. Ltd. PRC 97%
Hubei FTB Packaging Limited PRC 89%
Ningbo FTB Can Company Limited PRC 73%
Zhuhai FTB Packaging Limited PRC 73%
Xi'an Kunlun FTB Packaging Limited PRC 58%
Ball Asia Pacific Limited (formerly
M.C. Packaging (Hong Kong) Limited) Hong Kong 97%
MCP Beverage Packaging Limited Hong Kong 97%
MCP Industries Limited Hong Kong 97%
Plasco Limited Hong Kong 68%
Hainan M.C. Packaging Limited PRC 87%
Panyu MCP Industries Limited PRC 87%
Shenzhen M.C. Packaging Limited PRC 58%
Tianjin M.C. Packaging Limited PRC 78%
Hemei Containers (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. PRC 66%
Suzhou M.C. Beverage Packaging Co. Ltd. PRC 53%
Tianjin MCP Cap Manufacture Company Limited PRC 78%
Tianjin MCP Industries Limited PRC 78%
Zhongfu (Taicang) Plastics Products Co. Ltd. PRC 68%
GPT Global Packaging Technology AB Sweden 100%
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following is a list of affiliates of Ball Corporation included in the
financial statements under the equity and cost accounting methods:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
State or Country
of Incorporation Percentage
Name or Organization Ownership (2)
<S> <C> <C>
EarthWatch Incorporated Delaware 11%
San Miguel Yamamura Ball Corp. Philippines 6%
Lam Soon-Ball Yamamura Taiwan 8%
Latapack-Ball Embalagens Ltda. Brazil 50%
Centrotampa Embalagens Ltda. Brazil 50%
Thai Beverage Can Ltd. Thailand 40%
The following are owned indirectly through Ball Asia
Pacific Holdings Limited and Ball Asia Pacific Limited:
Sanshui Jianlibao FTB Packaging Limited PRC 34%
Zhongshan Yedao Drinks Limited PRC 25%
Norinco-MCP (Hong Kong) Limited Hong Kong 29%
Guangzhou M.C. Packaging Limited PRC 29%
Maoming Norinco MCP Company Limited PRC 22%
Qingdao M.C. Packaging Limited PRC 39%
Richmond Systempak Limited Hong Kong 32%
Shenzhen Norinco-MCP Company Limited PRC 29%
Beijing Shente Container Co. Ltd. PRC 22%
Hangzhou Cofco-M.C. Packaging Company Limited PRC 24%
</TABLE>
(1) In accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(21)(ii), the names of
certain subsidiaries have been omitted from the foregoing lists. The
unnamed subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary, as defined in Regulation
S-X, Rule 1-02(w).
(2) Represents the Registrant's direct and/or indirect ownership in each of the
subsidiaries' voting capital share.
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Accountants
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each Prospectus
constituting part of each Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 to Form
S-16 Registration Statement (Registration Nos. 2-62247 and 2-65638) and in each
Prospectus constituting part of each Form S-3 Registration Statement or
Post-Effective Amendment (Registration Nos. 33-3027, 33-16674, 33-19035,
33-40196 and 33-58741) and in each Form S-8 Registration Statement or
Post-Effective Amendment (Registration Nos. 33-21506, 33-40199, 33-37548,
33-28064, 33-15639, 33-61986, 33-51121, 333-26361, 333-32393 and 333-84561) of
Ball Corporation of our report dated January 26, 2000 relating to the financial
statements, which appear in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 30, 2000
Exhibit 24.1
Form 10-K
Limited Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned directors and
officers of Ball Corporation, an Indiana corporation, hereby constitute and
appoint R. David Hoover, Albert R. Schlesinger, and George A. Sissel, and any
one or all of them, the true and lawful agents and attorneys-in-fact of the
undersigned with full power and authority in said agents and attorneys-in-fact,
and in any one or more of them, to sign for the undersigned and in their
respective names as directors and officers of the Corporation the Form 10-K of
the Corporation to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to
sign any amendment to such Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming all acts
taken by such agents and attorneys-in-fact or any one of them, as herein
authorized.
Date: March 30, 2000
------------------------------
/s/ R. David Hoover /s/ Frank A. Bracken
- ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
R. David Hoover Officer Frank A. Bracken Director
/s/ Albert R. Schlesinger /s/ Howard M. Dean
- ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Albert R. Schlesinger Officer Howard M. Dean Director
/s/ George A. Sissel /s/ John T. Hackett
- ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
George A. Sissel Officer John T. Hackett Director
/s/ R. David Hoover
-------------------------------------
R. David Hoover Director
/s/ John F. Lehman
-------------------------------------
John F. Lehman Director
/s/ Ruel C. Mercure, Jr.
-------------------------------------
Ruel C. Mercure, Jr. Director
/s/ Jan Nicholson
-------------------------------------
Jan Nicholson Director
/s/ George A. Sissel
-------------------------------------
George A. Sissel Director
/s/ William P. Stiritz
-------------------------------------
William P. Stiritz Director
/s/ Stuart A. Taylor II
-------------------------------------
Stuart A. Taylor II Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27.1
BALL CORPORATION
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1999
<CASH> 35,800
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 220,200
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 565,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 895,800
<PP&E> 1,934,600
<DEPRECIATION> 813,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2,732,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 670,100
<BONDS> 1,092,700
0
35,700
<COMMON> 413,000
<OTHER-SE> 242,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 2,732,100
<SALES> 3,584,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 3,584,200
<CGS> 3,125,400
<TOTAL-COSTS> 3,125,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 107,600
<INCOME-PRETAX> 171,200
<INCOME-TAX> 64,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 104,200
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 104,200
<EPS-BASIC> 3.36
<EPS-DILUTED> 3.15
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act), Ball is hereby filing cautionary
statements identifying important factors that could cause Ball's actual results
to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements of Ball.
Forward-looking statements may be made in the Company's Annual Report and in
annual and periodic communications with investors. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements, and many of these statements are contained in Part
I, Item 2, "Business". The Reform Act defines forward-looking statements as
statements that express or imply an expectation or belief and contain a
projection, plan or assumption with regard to, among other things, future
revenues, income, earnings per share or capital structure. Such statements of
future events or performance involve estimates assumptions, and uncertainties,
and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the
following important factors that could cause Ball's actual results to differ
materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made by or on
behalf of Ball.
Some important factors that could cause Ball's actual results or outcomes to
differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to:
o Fluctuation in customer growth and demand, including loss of major
customers; manufacturing overcapacity; lack of productivity improvement;
weather; regulatory action; Federal, state and local law; interest rates;
labor strikes and work stoppages; boycotts; litigation involving antitrust,
intellectual property, consumer and other issues; maintenance and capital
expenditures; capital availability; economic conditions and acts of war or
catastrophic events.
o The timing and extent of regulation or deregulation, competition in each
line of business, product development and introductions and technology
changes.
o Ball's ability to have available sufficient production capacity in a timely
manner.
o Difficulties in obtaining raw materials, supplies, power and natural
resources needed for the production of metal and plastic containers as well
as telecommunications and aerospace products.
o The pricing of raw materials, supplies, power and natural resources needed
for the production of metal and plastic containers as well as
telecommunications and aerospace products, pricing and ability to sell
scrap associated with the production of metal containers and the effect of
changes in the cost of warehousing the Company's products.
o The ability to pass on to customers changes in raw material cost,
particularly resin, steel and aluminum.
o International business risks, particularly in foreign developing countries
such as China and Brazil, including political and economic instability in
foreign markets, restrictive trade practices of foreign governments, sudden
policy changes by foreign governments, the imposition of duties, taxes or
other government charges, foreign exchange rate risk, exchange controls and
national and regional labor strikes or work stoppages.
o Undertaking unsuccessful acquisitions, joint ventures and divestitures and
the integration activities associated with acquisitions and joint ventures.
o The failure to make cash payments and satisfy other debt obligations.
o The inability to achieve technological and product advances in the
Company's businesses.
o The inability of the Company to achieve year 2000 readiness.
o The success or lack of success of satellite launches and the businesses and
governments associated with the launches.
o The authorization, funding and availability of government contracts and the
nature and continuation of those contracts and related services, as well as
the cancellation or termination of government contracts for the U.S.
government, other customers or other government contractors.
o Fluctuation in the fiscal and monetary policy established by the U.S.
government.
