NEOPHARM INC
10-Q, 2000-11-14
COMMERCIAL PHYSICAL & BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Previous: MCGLEN INTERNET GROUP INC, 10QSB, EX-27, 2000-11-14
Next: NEOPHARM INC, 10-Q, EX-99.1, 2000-11-14

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

 
/x/
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2000

or

/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                

Commission file number 33-90516


NEOPHARM, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  51-0327886
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

100 Corporate North
Suite 215
Bannockburn, Illinois 60015

(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)

(847) 295-8678
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /x/  No / /

    Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the close of the period covered by this report:

Title of each class
  Number of shares outstanding
Common Stock ($.0002145 par value)   14,168,980




NEOPHARM, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)

 
   
   
  Page Number
PART I.       Financial Information    
    ITEM 1.   Financial Statements    
        Balance Sheets   3
        Statement of Operations   4
        Statement of Cash Flows   5
        Notes to Financial Statements   6
    ITEM 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   8
PART II.   Other Information   14
SIGNATURE PAGE   15

2



PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NEOPHARM, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)

BALANCE SHEET

 
  September 30, 2000
  December 31, 1999
 
 
  (Unaudited)

   
 
ASSETS
 
Current assets:              
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 124,493,765   $ 24,664,567  
  Other receivables     26,668     76,007  
  Tax refund receivable     126,000     126,000  
  Prepaid expenses     295,720     118,800  
   
 
 
      Total current assets   $ 124,942,153   $ 24,985,374  
Equipment and furniture              
  Equipment     113,072     85,447  
  Furniture     85,372     80,210  
Less accumulated depreciation     (121,570 )   (99,283 )
   
 
 
      Total equipment and furniture, net     76,874     66,374  
      Total assets   $ 125,019,027   $ 25,051,748  
       
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
 
 
Current liabilities:              
  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:              
    Obligations under research agreements   $ 173,333   $ 68,333  
    Accounts payable     272,997     567,357  
    Accrued compensation     169,836     296,000  
    Other accrued expenses     277,885     115,000  
   
 
 
      Total current liabilities   $ 894,051   $ 1,046,690  
   
 
 
Stockholders' equity              
    Common stock, $.0002145 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized:              
    14,168,980 and 11,028,617 shares issued and outstanding, respectively (Note 4)     3,040     2,366  
  Additional paid-in capital (Note 4)     126,035,215     25,709,261  
  Accumulated deficit     (1,913,279 )   (1,706,569 )
   
 
 
      Total stockholders' equity     124,124,976   $ 24,005,058  
   
 
 
      Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $ 125,019,027   $ 25,051,748  
       
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.

3


NEOPHARM, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND 1999
(Unaudited)

 
  Three Months September 30,
  Nine Months September 30,
 
  2000
  1999
  2000
  1999
Revenues:                        
  Licensing Revenues   $   $ 2,000,000   $ 3,000,000   $ 11,000,000
Expenses:                        
  Research and development     594,626     398,651     2,037,517     1,386,964
  General and administrative     679,109     493,257     1,907,965     1,601,811
  Related party expenses (Note 3)     292,636     177,252     470,863     1,198,060
   
 
 
 
    Total Expenses     1,566,371     1,069,160     4,416,345     4,186,835
 
Income/(loss) from operations
 
 
 
 
 
(1,566,371
 
)
 
 
 
930,840
 
 
 
 
 
(1,416,345
 
)
 
 
 
6,813,165
Interest income     402,574     232,397     1,209,633     330,991
Interest expense                 2,125
   
 
 
 
Interest income—net     402,574     232,397     1,209,633     328,866
Net income/(loss) before income taxes     (1,163,797 )   1,163,237     (206,712 )   7,142,031
   
 
 
 
Income taxes         465,000         2,857,000
   
 
 
 
Net Income/(loss)   $ (1,163,797 ) $ 698,237   $ (206,712 ) $ 4,285,031
       
 
 
 
Net Income (loss) per share:                        
  Basic   $ (.10 ) $ 0.07   $ (0.02 ) $ 0.47
       
 
 
 
  Diluted   $ (.10 ) $ 0.06   $ (0.02 ) $ 0.38
       
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:                        
  Basic     11,181,916     10,359,936     11,126,210     9,086,064
       
 
 
 
  Diluted     12,095,398     11,491,752     12,001,685     11,279,475
       
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4


NEOPHARM, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND 1999
(Unaudited)

 
  September 30,
2000

  September 30,
1999

 
Cash flows used in operating activities:              
  Net income/(loss)   $ (206,712 ) $ 4,285,031  
  Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:              
    Depreciation and amortization     22,288     27,000  
    Deferred income taxes         2,732,000  
    Compensation expense from non-employee stock options     235,668      
    Restricted stock grants in lieu of cash compensation     66,540      
    Increase in other assets     (127,581 )   (53,253 )
    Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (152,639 )   (8,589 )
       
 
 
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities     (162,436 )   6,982,189  
       
 
 
Cash flows used in investing activities:              
  Purchase of equipment and furniture     (32,789 )   (3,170 )
       
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities     (32,789 )   (3,170 )
       
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:              
  Proceeds from issuance of common stock (Note 4)     100,024,423     9,460,777  
  Proceeds from exercise of warrants, net         9,074,385  
       
 
 
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities     100,024,423     18,535,162  
       
 
 
Net increase in cash     99,829,198     25,514,181  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     24,664,567     40,681  
       
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period     124,493,765     25,554,862  
       
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for:              
  Interest   $   $ 2,126  
  Income taxes         125,000  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5


NEOPHARM, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2000

NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION

    The financial information herein is unaudited, other than the Balance Sheet at December 31, 1999, which is derived from the audited financial statements.

    The accompanying unaudited statements of NeoPharm, Inc. (the "Company") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position as of September 30, 2000, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2000 and 1999 and the changes in cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and 1999.

    While the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company's 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

NOTE 2 EARNINGS PER SHARE

    The following table sets forth the computation of the basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations:

 
  For the three months ended:
  For the nine months ended:
 
  September 30,
2000

  September 30,
1999

  September 30,
2000

  September 30,
1999

Numerator:                        
  Net income (loss) from continuing operations   $ (1,163,797 ) $ 698,237   $ (206,712 ) $ 4,285,031
       
 
 
 
Denominator:                        
  Denominator for basic income (loss) per share-weighted average shares     11,181,916     10,359,936     11,126,210     9,086,064
Effect of dilutive securities:                        
  Stock options     913,482     783,389     859,264     871,272
  Warrant exercise         348,427     16,211     1,322,139
       
 
 
 
Dilutive potential common shares     12,095,398     11,491,752     12,001,685     11,279,475
       
 
 
 
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per share-weighted average shares and assumed conversions                        
Basic income (loss) per share   $ (.10 ) $ .07   $ (.02 ) $ .47
       
 
 
 
Diluted income (loss) per share   $ (.10 ) $ .06   $ (.02 ) $ .38
       
 
 
 

6


NOTE 3 RELATED PARTY EXPENSES

    The following table provides further detail of the related party expenses reflected in the statement of operations:

 
   
  Three months
September 30,

  Nine Months
September 30,

Related Party

  Expense Type
  2000
  1999
  2000
  1999
Unicorn Pharma Consulting, Inc.   Consulting     75,883   $   $ 80,883   $
Georgetown University   Research & Fees     171,875     71,250     284,375     925,348
Gail Salzberg   Consulting     774     65,047     3,097     174,659
E.J. Financial Enterprises   Consulting     31,250     31,250     93,750     93,750
E.J. Financial Enterprises   Direct Expenses     4,592     1,500     9,532     4,303
       
 
 
 
  Total research and development expenses         284,374     169,047     471,637     1,198,060
Option Care, Inc.   Rent and Expenses     8,262     8,205     24,846     24,702
       
 
 
 
  Total general and administrative expenses         8,262     8,205     24,846     24,702
       
 
 
 
Total related party expenses       $ 292,636   $ 177,252   $ 496,483   $ 1,222,762
       
 
 
 

    Management believes that the terms of the related party transactions listed above were at fair market rates.

NOTE 4 PROCEEDS FROM STOCK OFFERING

    On September 29, 2000, the Company sold 3,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $33.37 per share, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, but before expenses, and received aggregate net proceeds of $100,110,000. The shares were sold in a public underwritten offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2000, and declared effective on September 25, 2000 (Reg. No. 333-44396).

    Subsequent to the close of the third quarter, on October 10, 2000, the Company sold 480,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $33.37 per share, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, but before expenses, and received aggregate net proceeds of $16,017,600. The shares were sold pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of the Company's public offering of 3,000,000 shares on September 29, 2000.

7


ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

    Any statements made by NeoPharm Inc. ("we", "us", "our", or the "Company") in this quarterly report that are forward looking are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions readers that important factors may affect the Company's actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changing market conditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, the timely development, approval by the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and foreign health authorities, and market acceptance of the Company's products in development, the Company's ability to further raise capital, the Company's dependence on key personnel, and other factors referenced under "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

OVERVIEW

    We are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the research and development and commercialization of drugs for the treatment of various cancers. We currently have a portfolio of seven anti-cancer drugs, three of which are in clinical trials. We have built our drug portfolio based on our two novel proprietary technology platforms: an electrostatic liposomal drug delivery platform and a tumor-targeting fusion protein platform. In February 1999, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Pharmacia Corporation ("Pharmacia"), to develop and commercialize two of our products: liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin, or LED, and liposomal encapsulated paclitaxel, or LEP. Pharmacia is currently conducting multi-center Phase II/III clinical trials of LEP for the treatment of a variety of solid tumor cancers, and multi-center Phase II/III clinical trials for LED for the treatment of breast and prostate cancers.

    In addition to LEP and LED, we have five other products under development. Under our electrostatic liposomal platform, we filed an investigational new drug application in July, 2000 for LE-AON, our liposomal encapsulated gene inhibitor for radiation resistant tumors, and we have initiated preclinical studies for liposomal encapsulated epirubicin, or LEE, and liposomal encapsulated mitoxantrone, or LEM. Under our tumor-targeting fusion protein platform, we are currently in a Phase I/II clinical trial for IL13-PE38, a tumor-targeting product for the treatment of kidney cancer. Additionally, we filed an investigational new drug application for IL13-PE38 in March 2000 for the treatment of glioblastoma and expect to commence Phase I/II clinical trials in the fourth quarter of 2000. In March 2000 we filed an investigational new drug application for our other tumor-targeting product, SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38, and we expect to commence Phase I/II clinical trials for SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38 for the treatment of various cancers in the fourth quarter of 2000.

OUR PRODUCTS

    We have utilized both our electrostatic liposomal drug delivery platform and our tumor-targeting platform to develop a group of novel anti-cancer products. Presently, we have three Products in clinical trials and four in preclinical trials.

ELECTROSTATIC LIPOSOMAL DRUG DELIVERY PLATFORM

Liposomal Encapsulated Paclitaxel

    Product Description.  LEP is a liposomal encapsulated formulation of the widely-used cancer drug, paclitaxel. Paclitaxel is marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company under the trade name "Taxol®" and is used in the treatment of a number of tumors, including breast, ovarian and lung cancer. Despite paclitaxel's wide use and its anti-tumor characteristics, its effectiveness is limited by its side effects, which can include nausea, vomiting, hair loss and nerve and muscle pain. Because of the chemical

8


characteristics of paclitaxel, it cannot be introduced into the body unless it is first formulated in a toxic mixture of castor oil and ethanol which requires premedication of the patient. In addition, paclitaxel must be infused over a period of at least three hours.

    We believe our technology may overcome many of the current limitations of paclitaxel by utilizing cardiolipin, a naturally occurring negatively charged lipid found in cardiac tissue, to increase the solubility of paclitaxel. We have been able to standardize the preparation of cardiolipin through the development of a proprietary form of synthetic cardiolipin. Using cardiolipin eliminates the need for administration of castor oil and ethanol and reduces the need for the accompanying premedication. Since paclitaxel has a positive charge and cardiolipin has a negative charge, cardiolipin electrostatically combines with the paclitaxel to form a stable product that can be freeze dried and easily reconstituted. Based on preclinical studies, we believe another potential advantage of LEP may be the ability of cardiolipin to overcome multi-drug resistance, which is the resistance to cancer drugs developed by cells which have been exposed to several rounds of chemotherapy. As a result, we may be able to significantly increase the effectiveness of LEP against tumors, thereby maximizing the killing of otherwise resistant cells.

    Development Status.  LEP is being developed for various solid tumors. We believe LEP is the first, and only, liposomal form of paclitaxel to enter clinical trials. Enrollment of patients in our Phase I/II clinical trials for LEP was completed in April 2000. These Phase I/II trials involved the treatment of 31 cancer patients, none of whom were then responding to other forms of treatment. Our Phase I/II trials have provided evidence that LEP may be able to be administered at higher levels than paclitaxel is currently administered, with fewer side effects. Although not designed to measure efficacy, six patients in the Phase I/II trial experienced tumor reductions greater than 35%. The tumors in twelve other patients did not increase in size after 12 weeks, and in four of these twelve patients, the tumors were still stable in size one year later. Some patients received significantly more cycles of LEP than can be given with unencapsulated paclitaxel, including two patients who received greater than 30 cycles of LEP. None of the patients showed signs of the nerve and muscle pain commonly associated with paclitaxel, and most patients did not experience the hair loss or nausea often associated with paclitaxel treatment.

    Currently, our collaboration partner, Pharmacia, is initiating large scale multi-center, multinational Phase II/III clinical trials. These Phase II/III trials will assess LEP as both a single and combination therapy for a variety of solid tumors to determine its safety and efficacy.

Liposomal Encapsulated Doxorubicin

    Product Description.  LED is a liposomal encapsulated formulation of the widely used cancer drug, doxorubicin. Doxorubicin is used to treat a number of cancers including solid tumors and leukemia, a form of blood cancer. Though effective in treating these and other cancers, doxorubicin may produce irreversible heart damage. The risk of heart failure increases with increasing total doses of doxorubicin. Doxorubicin also causes suppression of white blood cell production, which may limit the dose that may be administered, and produces side effects such as nausea, vomiting and hair loss. Clinical results to date suggest that LED may reduce these side effects. In addition, since doxorubicin has a positive charge and cardiolipin has a negative charge, cardiolipin electrostatically binds to the doxorubicin to form a stable product that can be freeze dried and easily reconstituted. We believe LED, unlike other liposomal doxorubicin products currently available, may reduce multi-drug resistance and be easier to manufacture because of its formulation with cardiolipin.

    Development Status.  We intend to develop LED for breast, prostate and blood cancers. We completed a Phase I/II trial in May 1998, which provided evidence that LED demonstrated lower toxicity when compared to unencapsulated doxorubicin and could be given at approximately double the current standard dose for doxorubicin. In June 1998, Phase II clinical trials for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer in 10 patients were initiated. After four rounds of treatment, the level of

9


prostate specific antigen, an indicator of the extent of disease progression, decreased by greater than 35% in two patients and stabilized in two other patients. These four patients reported a significant reduction in pain. Pharmacia is currently conducting multi-center Phase II/III clinical trials of LED.

Liposomal Encapsulated Antisense Oligonucleotides

    Product Description.  We have developed a liposomal encapsulated antisense cRaf oligonucleotide, LE-AON, which we believe inhibits the expression of the cRaf protein and thus may have potential to enhance the effectiveness of radiation in the treatment of certain cancers. cRaf is a protein which is expressed at higher levels in cancer cells which are resistant to radiation therapy than in healthy cells. By inhibiting expression of this gene, the cell becomes more susceptible to radiation therapy. Our liposomes provide a non-viral method of delivering the gene inhibitor into the cell. An additional advantage of LE-AON is that it can be administered intravenously and is relatively easy to manufacture.

    Development Status.  We intend to develop LE-AON as a treatment for radiation resistant tumors. In our preclinical studies, intravenous administration of LE-AON appeared to inhibit cRaf gene expression in tumor tissue. When LE-AON was given in combination with radiation treatment, tumor regression for at least 27 days was observed. We filed an investigational new drug application for LE-AON for patients with radiation resistant solid tumors in July 2000, and expect to begin Phase I/II clinical trials for LE-AON late in the fourth quarter of 2000.

Liposomal Encapsulated Epirubicin

    Epirubicin is a drug that is widely used in Europe for the treatment of breast cancer and was recently introduced in the U.S. market by our collaborative partner, Pharmacia. We believe LEE will demonstrate a safety and efficacy advantage over unencapsulated epirubicin. We have recently encapsulated epirubicin in our liposomes and intend to evaluate its properties as a treatment for breast cancer. We are currently conducting preclinical studies to evaluate the profile of this drug.

Liposomal Encapsulated Mitoxantrone

    We recently encapsulated mitoxantrone in our liposomes. Mitoxantrone is used for the treatment of prostate cancer and multiple sclerosis. We believe LEM will demonstrate a safety and efficacy advantage over unencapsulated mitoxantrone. Currently we are continuing preclinical studies to evaluate the profile of this drug.

TUMOR-TARGETING FUSION PROTEIN PLATFORM

IL13-PE38

    Product Description.  IL13-PE38 is a tumor-targeting agent we are developing for the treatment of kidney and brain cancers. Research by scientists at the FDA and the NIH has demonstrated that some solid tumors express higher numbers of IL13 receptors on their cell surfaces in comparison with healthy cells. IL13-PE38 links the cytotoxin PE38 to the tumor-targeting agent IL13. When administered, IL13-PE38 is expected to target the IL13 receptors, thereby killing the tumor cells with minimal damage to the healthy cells.

    In September 1997, we entered into an exclusive worldwide licensing agreement with the FDA and the NIH giving us rights to develop and commercialize IL13-PE38. We also entered into a cooperative research and development agreement with the FDA for the clinical and commercial development of IL13-PE38 as an anti-cancer agent. We believe this is the first collaboration between the FDA and a biopharmaceutical company.

10


    Development Status.  We are evaluating IL13-PE38 as a treatment for kidney and brain cancers. In preclinical studies, IL13-PE38 has provided evidence of tumor regression in a number of cancers, which suggests the potential for a favorable toxicity profile. We filed an investigational new drug application for IL13-PE38 in June 1999 for the treatment of refractory kidney cancer and entered Phase I/II clinical trials in October 1999 for this indication. In our Phase I/II clinical trials we determined the maximum tolerated dose and schedule and we are currently working to establish the proper dosage level and schedule. We filed an investigational new drug application in March 2000 for brain cancer and anticipate beginning Phase I/II clinical trials for brain cancer in the fourth quarter of 2000.

SS1 (DS FV)-PE38

    Product Description.  SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38 links the cytotoxin PE38 to the antibody SS1 (ds Fv). As is the case with IL13, SS1 (ds Fv) targets specific receptors on cancer cells and delivers the cytotoxin directly to the cancer cells with minimal effect on healthy cells. In March 1999, we executed a worldwide exclusive licensing agreement with the NIH giving us rights to develop and commercialize SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38. We also entered into a cooperative research and development agreement with the NIH for the clinical and commercial development of SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38 as an anti-cancer agent.

    Development Status.  We are evaluating SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38 as a treatment for ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer and mesothelioma, a type of lung cancer. In March 2000, we filed an investigational new drug application for SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38 for the treatment of certain common cancers and expect to commence Phase I/II clinical studies in ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, and head and neck cancers in the fourth quarter of 2000. In preclinical studies, SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38 demonstrated very specific targeting to receptors for ovarian cancer and head and neck cancers and a high level of tumor toxicity. Preclinical studies demonstrated a high rate of response in ovarian tumors.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.

    The Company recorded no revenue for the three month period ended September 30, 2000. During the three month period ended September 30, 1999, the Company recorded $2,000,000 of licensing revenue related to the licensing agreement with Pharmacia.

    Research and development expense for the three month period ended September 30, 2000 was $879,000 compared to $567,698 for the same period in 1999. The overall increase in research and development costs was the result of increases in consulting expenses of approximately $164,000 and other research expenses of approximately $147,000 related primarily to the pre-clinical development of LE-AON, IL13-PE38, SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38, LEE and LEM.

    General and administrative expenses for the three month period ended September 30, 2000 were $687,371 compared to $501,462 for the same period in 1999. The overall increase in general and administrative expenses was a result of increased consulting and compensation expenses of approximately $111,000, increased insurance costs of approximately $41,000 and increased professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses of approximately $34,000.

    We generated interest income on excess cash balances of $402,574 and $232,397 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

    We incurred no interest expense for the three month periods ended September 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

    We recorded no income tax expense or benefit for the current period ended September 30, 2000 and a tax expense of $465,000 for the period ended September 30, 1999.

11


    The net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2000 was $1,163,797 compared to net income of $698,237 for the three month period ended September 30, 1999. Net loss per share for the three month period ended September 30, 2000 was $0.10 basic and diluted compared to net income per share of $0.07 basic and $0.06 diluted for the three months ended September 30, 1999.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.

    For the nine month period ended September 30, 2000, we recorded $3,000,000 in milestone payments from Pharmacia for completion of Phase I and beginning of Phase II/III clinical trials for LEP. For the same period in 1999 we recorded revenue of $11,000,000 from a nonrefundable license fee of $9,000,000 and a $2,000,000 milestone payment, both related to the licensing agreement with Pharmacia for the development and commercialization of LEP and LED.

    Research and development expense for the nine month period ended September 30, 2000 was $2,508,380 compared to $2,585,024 for the same period in 1999. The overall reduction in research and development costs was the result of a decrease of $1,190,000 in expenses associated with the development of LEP and LED as a result of the licensing agreement with Pharmacia, coupled with an increase of $1,113,000 in spending in 2000 related primarily to the pre-clinical development of LE-AON, IL13-PE38, SS1 (ds Fv)-PE38, LEM and LEE.

    General and administrative expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2000 were $1,907,965 compared to $1,601,811 for the same period in 1999. The overall increase in general and administrative expenses was the result of an increase in professional fees and various other general and administrative expenses of $116,000, an increase in consulting and compensation expense of approximately $149,000 and an increase in insurance costs of approximately $41,000.

    We generated interest income on excess cash balances of $1,209,633 and $330,991 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2000 and September 30, 1999, respectively, due to a larger average excess cash balance in 2000.

    We incurred interest expense of $0 and $2,125 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2000 and September 30, 1999, respectively.

    We recorded no income tax expense or benefit for the period ended September 30, 2000 compared to income tax expense of $2,857,000 for the period ended September 30, 1999.

    The net loss for the nine month period ended September 30, 2000 was $206,712 compared to net income of $4,285,031 for the nine month period ended September 30, 1999. Net loss per share for the nine month period ended September 30, 2000 was $0.02 basic and diluted compared to net income per share of $0.47 basic and $0.38 diluted for the nine month period ended September 30, 1999.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

    At September 30, 2000, we had $124,493,765 in cash and cash equivalents and net working capital of $124,048,102. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents should be adequate to fund our immediate needs. However, we can offer no assurances that additional funding will not be required in the foreseeable future. All excess cash has been invested in short-term investments.

    Our assets at September 30, 2000, were $125,019,027 compared to $25,051,748 at December 31, 1999. This increase in assets was primarily due to an increase of cash and cash equivalents of approximately $99,829,000 as a result of cash provided by financing activities of approximately $100,024,000, coupled with cash used in operating activities of approximately $162,000 and cash used in investing activities of approximately $33,000. The cash provided by financing activities resulted primarily

12


from the proceeds of the sale of 3,000,000 shares of Company stock sold by the Company on September 29, 2000.

    Our liabilities at September 30, 2000 decreased to approximately $894,000 from approximately $1,047,000 at December 31, 1999. This decrease was attributable to a decrease in trade payables of approximately $295,000, an increase in accrued expenses of approximately $163,000, a decrease in accrued compensation of approximately $126,000 and an increase in obligations under research agreements of approximately $105,000.

    We may seek to satisfy our future funding requirements through public or private offerings of securities, with collaborative or other arrangements with corporate partners or from other sources. Additional financing may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us. If adequate financing is not available, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate certain of our research and development programs, relinquish rights to certain of our technologies, cancer drugs or products, or license third parties to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to develop ourselves.

13



PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings   None
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Changes in Securities
 
 
 
None
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
 
 
None
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

    Acting pursuant to Section 228 of the General Corporation law of the state of Delaware (the "Delaware Law"), in August 2000, the Board of Directors obtained the consent of the holders of more than a majority of the Company's then issued and outstanding shares to the amendment of ARTICLE FOURTH of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.0002145 per share, from 15,000,000 shares to 25,000,000 shares and to the restatement of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation. Consents from the holders of 6,026,295 shares, representing 54.07% of the then outstanding shares, were obtained and notice of the consent of stockholders in lieu of meeting was provided to all stockholders in accordance with Delaware Law.

Item 5.   Other Information    

    On August 31, 2000, the Company filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware containing an amended ARTICLE FOURTH which increased the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.0002145, from 15,000,000 shares to 25,000,000 shares.

Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K    
    Exhibit 3.01   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-44396))    
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 27
 
 
 
Financial Data Schedule
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 99
 
 
 
Notice of Consent of Stockholders in Lieu of Meeting
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

14



SIGNATURE PAGE

    PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

    NEOPHARM, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
 
 
/s/ 
LAWRENCE A. KENYON   
Lawrence A. Kenyon,
Chief Financial Officer and Authorized Officer
        Date:   November 13, 2000
           

15



QuickLinks

NEOPHARM, INC. (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
SIGNATURE PAGE


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission