<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File Number 1-11463
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware I.R.S. No. 62-1596939
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
755 Crossover Lane
Memphis, Tennessee 38117
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(901) 374-5000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
------- --------
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock, as of September 30, 1996.
Common Stock ................................51,393,386 shares
Page 1 of 33
Exhibit Index Page 32
<PAGE>
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
------------------------------
Item 1. Financial Statements
----------------------------
As discussed in Note 1, on June 30, 1995, The Promus Companies
Incorporated (Parent) completed the transfer of the operations, assets and
liabilities of its hotel business (the Hotel Business), composed of three brands
targeted at specific market segments (Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn and Homewood
Suites) to a new publicly traded entity, Promus Hotel Corporation (Promus or the
Company). The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements of
Promus include the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of the
Hotel Business on a stand-alone basis for the first six months of 1995, and the
actual results of the Company for all periods presented thereafter.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of
Promus, a Delaware corporation, have been prepared in accordance with the
instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore do not include all information and
notes necessary for complete financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. The financial statements are unaudited, but
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which
management considers necessary for a fair presentation of financial position,
results of operations and cash flows. Results of operations for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of a full year of operations. These consolidated
condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with Promus'
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Promus 1995
Annual Report to Stockholders.
2
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Sept 30, Dec 31,
(in thousands, except share amounts) 1996 1995
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,549 $ 2,668
Receivables, including notes receivable of $943 and $497,
less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,361 and $1,172 20,473 14,837
Deferred income taxes 1,998 3,492
Prepayments and other 3,631 2,429
--------- ---------
Total current assets 31,651 23,426
Land, buildings, furniture and equipment 440,973 436,887
Less: accumulated depreciation (117,112) (104,993)
--------- ---------
323,861 331,894
Investments in and advances to nonconsolidated affiliates
(Note 6) 161,099 90,506
Investment in franchise system 41,039 31,652
Deferred costs and other 46,399 42,331
--------- ---------
$ 604,049 $ 519,809
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 14,630 $ 18,202
Accrued expenses 37,450 36,371
Current portion of long-term debt 282 278
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities 52,362 54,851
Long-term debt (Note 3) 248,160 229,479
Deferred credits and other 38,776 36,282
Deferred income taxes 36,313 31,830
--------- ---------
375,611 352,442
--------- ---------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 360,000,000 shares authorized,
51,393,386 and 51,371,152 shares outstanding, net of 5,639
and 2,626 shares held in treasury 5,139 5,137
Capital surplus 136,390 136,057
Retained earnings 75,926 25,349
Unrealized gain on marketable equity securities, net of
related deferred tax liability of $7,457 and $1,165 11,665 1,822
Deferred compensation related to restricted stock (682) (998)
--------- ---------
228,438 167,367
--------- ---------
$ 604,049 $ 519,809
========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
balance sheets.
3
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30,
(in thousands) 1996 1995 1996 1995
-------- ------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues
Company owned hotels
Rooms $ 30,405 $ 29,333 $ 93,360 $ 88,967
Food and beverage 1,446 1,690 4,632 5,478
Other 1,786 1,764 5,530 5,194
Franchise and management fees 29,522 22,491 77,040 60,684
Other 9,625 6,375 23,777 19,341
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues 72,784 61,653 204,339 179,664
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating expenses
Company owned hotels
Rooms 14,890 14,360 44,870 42,341
Food and beverage 1,430 1,722 4,373 5,276
Other 3,074 3,259 9,604 9,946
Other operating expenses 4,917 3,725 18,935 16,177
Depreciation of buildings and equipment 5,939 5,248 17,793 15,687
Corporate expense 4,954 4,317 11,440 8,518
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses 35,204 32,631 107,015 97,945
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income before property transactions 37,580 29,022 97,324 81,719
Property transactions 402 2,358 3,939 2,031
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income 37,982 31,380 101,263 83,750
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
(Note 3) (7,008) (7,457) (22,409) (23,837)
Interest and other income 2,459 430 7,015 1,104
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes and
extraordinary item 33,433 24,353 85,869 61,017
Provision for income taxes (13,741) (10,253) (35,292) (25,688)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income before extraordinary item 19,692 14,100 50,577 35,329
Extraordinary gain, net of income tax - 1,661 - 1,661
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (Note 8) $ 19,692 $ 15,761 $ 50,577 $ 36,990
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
4
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30,
(in thousands) 1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income $ 50,577 $ 36,990
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to cash flows provided by operating activities
Extraordinary item - (2,637)
Depreciation and amortization 19,936 18,658
Other noncash items (2,143) (832)
Equity in earnings of, net of distributions
from, nonconsolidated affiliates 765 (1,567)
Net gains from property transactions (4,252) (2,159)
Net change in long-term accounts (1,053) (156)
Net change in working capital accounts (7,104) 13,649
-------- --------
Cash flows provided by operating activities 56,726 61,946
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities
Investment in and advances to nonconsolidated
affiliates (59,495) (16,576)
Land, buildings, furniture and equipment additions (38,519) (44,517)
Proceeds from property transactions 34,013 7,863
Net investments in franchise system (13,878) (4,393)
Advances under mezzanine loan agreements (5,793) (6,754)
Recovery of investment in franchise system 4,015 2,387
Repayments under mezzanine loan agreements 2,750 -
Other 4,064 377
-------- --------
Cash flows used in investing activities (72,843) (61,613)
-------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (retirements) under revolving credit facility 18,900 (15,550)
Advances from parent - 14,840
Other 98 (150)
-------- --------
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing
activities 18,998 (860)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,881 (527)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 2,668 2,221
-------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 5,549 $ 1,694
======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
5
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION
- ------------------------------------------------
On June 30, 1995, The Promus Companies Incorporated (Parent) completed the
transfer of the operations, assets and liabilities of its hotel business (the
Hotel Business), composed of three hotel brands targeted at specific market
segments (Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn and Homewood Suites) to a new publicly
traded entity, Promus Hotel Corporation (Promus or the Company). As approved by
Parent's Board of Directors and stockholders on May 26, 1995, this entity was
spun-off (the Spin-Off) from Parent and its stock was distributed to Parent's
stockholders on a one-for-two basis effective June 30, 1995 (the Distribution).
Concurrent with the Distribution, Parent changed its name to Harrah's
Entertainment, Inc.
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements include the
assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of Parent's Hotel
Business on a stand-alone basis for the first six months of 1995, and the actual
results of the Company for all periods presented thereafter. The preparation of
these financial statements required the use of certain estimates by management
in determining the Company's assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated. Investments in 50% or less owned companies and joint ventures over
which Promus has the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for
using the equity method. Promus reflects its share of income before interest
expense of these nonconsolidated affiliates in revenues - other and its
proportionate share of interest expense of such nonconsolidated affiliates is
included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income (see Note
6 for combined summarized financial information regarding these nonconsolidated
affiliates). Management believes Promus' inclusion of its proportionate share
of the interest expense of its equity investees in interest expense is the
preferable presentation due to the nature of its equity investments. Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current
presentation.
6
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 2 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS
- -----------------------------
Promus owns, operates and franchises the Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn,
Homewood Suites, Hampton Inn & Suites and Embassy Vacation Resorts (EVR) hotel
brands. The Embassy Suites brand is a full-service hotel brand that management
believes comprises the largest all-suite upscale hotel system in the United
States by number of hotel suites and system revenue. The Hampton Inn brand
offers a limited-facility hotel and the Homewood Suites brand offers
residential-style accommodations designed for the extended stay traveler. The
Hampton Inn & Suites brand combines, in a single hotel, Hampton-style rooms with
two-room suites and a lodge-like common area. EVR is the Company's newest hotel
brand and represents Promus' entry into the timeshare market.
Promus' primary focus is to develop, grow and support its franchise
business for all brands. Promus brand hotels are located in virtually every
state, the District of Columbia and five foreign countries. Promus charges each
franchisee royalty fees of generally four percent of suite or room rentals.
Royalty fees for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and 1995 were based on
system-wide reported rooms revenues of $1.5 billion (including $93.4 million
from company owned hotels) and $1.2 billion, (including $89.0 million from
company owned hotels), respectively. In addition, Promus earns a licensing fee
for new licenses granted to franchisees when the franchise is approved. Promus
also receives franchise fees of generally two percent of net interval sales and
two percent of suite revenues related to Embassy Vacation Resort properties.
Promus operates 124 Promus-brand hotels (including two Embassy Vacation
Resorts). Company operated properties include wholly-owned, partially owned
through joint ventures and hotels managed for third parties. Promus has
followed an asset strategy to own and manage a mix of Promus hotels that can
positively affect profits and enhance its role as franchisor for its brands.
Management fee income is based on a percentage of gross revenues, profits, or
both, at the related managed property.
7
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 3 - LONG-TERM DEBT
- -----------------------
Parent Debt Allocation
----------------------
The Company's results of operations through June 30, 1995 reflect all
indebtedness, together with related interest expense, specifically identified
with Promus entities, as well as a pro rata portion of Parent's historical
corporate debt balance, unamortized deferred finance charges and interest
expense. Allocations of those amounts to Promus from Parent were based on the
percentage of Parent's historical corporate debt that was expected to be retired
using proceeds from Promus' new $350 million bank credit facility (the Promus
Facility). Parent's corporate interest expense, including amortization of
deferred finance costs, allocated to Promus before the Spin-Off was
$10.5 million (which represents interest through June 30) for the nine months
ended September 30, 1995.
Interest Rate Agreements
------------------------
As of September 30, 1996, Promus was a party to several interest rate swap
agreements that help the Company manage the relative mix of its debt between
fixed and variable rate instruments. These agreements effectively modify the
interest characteristics of its outstanding debt without an exchange of the
underlying principal amount. Pursuant to the agreements, Promus receives a
variable interest rate tied to LIBOR in exchange for its payments at a fixed
interest rate. The fixed rates to be paid by Promus are summarized in the
following table.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Next
Quarterly
Notional Amount Variable
(All Associated Effective Rate
with the Promus Swap Rate Rate at Adjustment Swap
Facility) Paid (Fixed) Sept 30 Date Maturity
--------------- ----------- --------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$12.5 million 6.92% 7.37% 12/1996 12/1998
$12.5 million 6.74% 7.19% 10/1996 1/1999
$12.5 million 6.68% 7.13% 12/1996 12/1999
$12.5 million 6.52% 6.97% 10/1996 1/2000
$50.0 million 6.99% 7.44% 12/1996 3/2000
</TABLE>
8
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 3 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
- ----------------------------------
Beginning in November 1996, the effective rate for all swap agreements will
be 40 basis points higher than the fixed rates noted in the table above
(representing a five basis point reduction). The differences to be paid or
received under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements described above
are accrued as an adjustment to interest expense for the related debt.
Changes in interest rates pursuant to the terms of these interest rate
agreements will have a corresponding effect on Promus' future cash flows.
These agreements contain a credit risk that the counterparties may be unable
to meet the terms of the agreements. Promus minimizes that risk by
evaluating the creditworthiness of its counterparties, which are limited to
major banks and financial institutions, and does not anticipate
nonperformance by the counterparties.
NOTE 4 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
- --------------------------------------
Contractual Commitments
-----------------------
Promus is liable under certain lease agreements pursuant to which it has
assigned the direct obligation to third party interests. Additionally, Promus
manages certain hotels for others under agreements that provide for payments or
loans to the hotel owners if stipulated levels of financial performance are not
maintained. The Company has also provided guarantees for certain loans related
to joint venture and other investments (see discussion regarding $25.0 million
loan guarantee related to the FelCor Agreements below). Promus believes the
likelihood is remote that material payments will be required under these
agreements. Promus' estimated maximum exposure under such agreements is
approximately $62.3 million over the next 30 years.
FelCor Agreements
-----------------
In May 1995, Promus entered into a Subscription Agreement with FelCor Suite
Hotels, Inc. and FelCor Suites Limited Partnership (FelCor) whereby Promus
agreed to purchase up to $25.0 million in FelCor limited partnership interests
to help fund the partnership's acquisition of all-suite upscale hotels to be
converted to the Embassy Suites brand. In September 1995, Promus entered into a
second agreement with FelCor in connection with FelCor's agreement to acquire
the Crown Sterling Suites hotel chain. FelCor is currently in the process of
converting 16 of the Crown Sterling Suites hotels they acquired (over 4,000
suites) to the Embassy Suites brand. In consideration, Promus agreed to
9
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
- -------------------------------------------------
make up to a $50.0 million investment in FelCor common stock and has guaranteed
repayment of a third party loan advanced to FelCor that is not to exceed
$25.0 million (which is included in the $62.3 million estimate of maximum
exposure under contractual commitments discussed above). Hotels converted to
the Embassy Suites brand under either of these agreements will operate under
20-year license agreements, and 10-year management contracts will be awarded
to Promus. Subject to some restrictions, the limited partnership interests
may be converted to shares of FelCor common stock on a one-for-one basis and
the common stock may be sold on the open market.
As of September 30, 1996, FelCor had acquired 24 all-suite hotel properties
(including 16 Crown Sterling Suites hotels) under these agreements. Of the
eight non-Crown Sterling Suites hotels acquired, five had been Embassy Suites
hotels before their acquisition, and two of those five were already being
managed by Promus. As of September 30, 1996, Promus managed all 24 properties
(which include 5,767 suites), with four of the Crown Sterling Suites hotels
still in the process of being converted to the Embassy Suites brand. Conversion
of the remaining properties is expected to be complete by year end. Although
management fees are already being earned on all of these properties, franchise
royalties do not begin to accrue until the conversion is complete. As of
September 30, 1996, Promus had funded the entire $75.0 million commitment.
Based on the market value of FelCor common stock as of September 30, 1996,
Promus recorded an unrealized gain on marketable equity securities of
$18.5 million (before tax) directly to stockholders' equity. This amount will
change with increases or decreases in the market value of FelCor common stock;
however, no earnings impact will be realized until the actual sale of the
stock.
Equity and Winston Agreements
-----------------------------
During 1996, Promus entered into strategic development alliances with
Equity Inns, Inc. (Equity) and Winston Hotels, Inc. (Winston) whereby Promus
will invest up to $15.0 million in the common stock of both Equity and
Winston as they purchase existing or to be constructed Promus hotels from the
Company. Promus currently plans to build approximately seven to ten Homewood
Suites and/or Hampton Inn & Suites properties per year at an average cost of
$7-10 million per property. Of those hotels built each year, up to
two-thirds are expected to be offered for sale to Equity and Winston at
Promus' cost of construction. In May 1996, two company owned properties
10
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
- --------------------------------------------------
Equity and Winston Agreements (Continued)
-----------------------------------------
were sold to Equity for cash proceeds of $18.6 million. Simultaneously,
Promus made a $4.0 million investment in Equity common stock. In September,
two additional company owned properties were sold (one to Equity and one to
Winston) for cash proceeds of $15.4 million. In connection with this
transaction, Promus invested $1.5 million in the common stock of both Equity
and Winston. Based on the market value of Equity and Winston common stock as
of September 30, 1996, Promus recorded an unrealized gain on marketable equity
securities of $0.6 million (before tax) directly to stockholders' equity.
Both Equity and Winston have expressed their intent to spend up to
$100.0 million for the development of Promus brand properties over the next
few years. Promus will receive 20-year license agreements and 10-year
management contracts for all hotels developed or purchased pursuant to these
alliances.
Litigation
----------
The Company is a party to various inquiries, administrative proceedings and
litigation relating to contracts, sales of property and other matters arising in
the normal course of business. While any proceeding or litigation has an
element of uncertainty, management believes that the final outcome of these
matters will not have a materially adverse effect upon Promus' consolidated
financial position or its results of operations.
Employment and Severance Agreements
-----------------------------------
Promus has severance agreements with 13 senior officers of the Company that
provide for a payment of 2.99 times the average annual cash compensation (salary
and bonus) paid to each executive for the five preceding calendar years,
including compensation paid during service with Parent. The agreements also
provide for accelerated payment of any compensation or awards payable to the
executives under any Promus incentive compensation or stock option plan in the
event of termination of an executive's employment, as described in the
agreements, subsequent to a change in control of Promus, as defined. The
maximum amount of compensation that would be payable under all agreements if a
change in control occurred and if the executives were terminated as of
September 30, 1996, would be approximately $21.3 million.
11
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
- --------------------------------------------------
Self-Insurance Reserves
-----------------------
Promus self-insures various levels of general liability, workers'
compensation and employee medical coverage. All self-insurance reserves include
accruals of estimated settlements for known claims, as well as accruals of
actuarial estimates of incurred but not reported claims. These estimates are
based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future
events. Changes in assumptions for such things as medical costs
and legal expenses, as well as changes in actual experience, could cause these
estimates to change in the near term.
NOTE 5 - SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH PAID FOR INTEREST AND TAXES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table reconciles Promus' interest expense, net of interest
capitalized, to cash paid for interest (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30,
1996 1995 1996 1995
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized
(Note 3) $ 7,008 $ 7,457 $22,409 $23,837
Adjustments to reconcile to cash paid for interest
Promus' share of interest expense of
nonconsolidated affiliates (Note 6) (2,656) (3,208) (8,692) (9,823)
Capitalized interest 414 308 1,139 972
Net change in accruals (20) (1,896) 226 (1,896)
Amortization of deferred finance charges (105) (192) (493) (594)
Other (40) (39) (116) (124)
------- ------- ------- -------
Cash paid for interest $ 4,601 $ 2,430 $14,473 $12,372
======= ======= ======= =======
Cash paid for income taxes $13,237 $ 640 $38,016 $ 640
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
For purposes of this presentation, interest expense allocated to Promus by
Parent is assumed to be paid in the quarter allocated. Parent was responsible
for the payment of Promus' income taxes for periods prior to the Spin-Off.
12
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 6 - NONCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
- -----------------------------------
Combined summarized statements of income for nonconsolidated affiliates,
which Promus accounted for using the equity method, were as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30,
1996 1995 1996 1995
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Combined Summarized Statements of Income
Revenues $41,547 $40,643 $124,712 $121,413
======= ======= ======== ========
Operating income $11,464 $ 9,573 $ 31,725 $ 28,745
======= ======= ======== ========
Net income $ 5,777 $ 8,017 $ 13,098 $ 13,022
======= ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
Promus' share of its nonconsolidated affiliates' combined net income is
reflected in the accompanying consolidated condensed statements of income as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30,
1996 1995 1996 1995
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Pre-interest income (included in
revenues - other) $ 6,523 $ 5,182 $17,383 $15,648
======= ======= ======= =======
Interest expense (included in interest expense) $(2,656) $(3,208) $(8,692) $(9,823)
======= ======= ======= =======
Extraordinary gain on forgiveness of debt
(included in extraordinary gain, net of
income tax) $ - $ 1,661 $ - $ 1,661
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 6 - NONCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
- -----------------------------------------------
The components of investments in and advances to nonconsolidated affiliates
reflected in the consolidated condensed balance sheets were as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Sept 30, Dec 31,
1996 1995
-------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
At market $101,610 $33,016
At equity 49,365 39,868
At cost 10,124 17,622
-------- -------
$161,099 $90,506
======== =======
</TABLE>
NOTE 7 - SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
- -----------------------------------------
Promus Hotels, Inc. (PHI) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Promus and the
primary entity through which the operations of Promus are conducted. PHI is
also Promus' principal asset. Summarized consolidated financial information for
PHI, prepared on the same basis as Promus, is as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Sept 30, Dec 31,
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets $ 24,035 $ 23,246
Land, buildings and equipment, net 323,861 331,894
Other assets 244,772 163,714
-------- --------
592,668 518,854
-------- --------
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities 45,773 54,851
Long-term debt 248,160 229,479
Other liabilities 74,833 68,112
-------- --------
368,766 352,442
-------- --------
Net assets $223,902 $166,412
======== ========
</TABLE>
14
<PAGE>
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 7 - SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
- ----------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30,
1996 1995 1996 1995
------- ------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $72,784 $61,653 $204,339 $179,664
======= ======= ======== ========
Operating income $38,111 $31,629 $101,751 $ 83,999
======= ======= ======== ========
Net income $19,771 $15,904 $ 50,875 $ 37,134
======= ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
NOTE 8 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
- ---------------------------
Promus' common stock was distributed in connection with the Spin-Off on
June 30, 1995. In order to present earnings per share on a comparable basis,
the weighted average common shares outstanding for periods prior to the Spin-Off
are assumed to be equal to the actual common and common equivalent shares
outstanding on June 30, 1995. Historical net income is used for all periods
presented (in thousands, except per share amounts).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30, Sept 30,
1996 1995 1996 1995
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income $19,692 $15,761 $50,577 $36,990
======= ======= ======= =======
Earnings per share $ 0.38 $ 0.31 $ 0.98 $ 0.72
======= ======= ======= =======
Weighted average shares outstanding 51,712 51,570 51,659 51,566
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
---------------------------------------------
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
-------------------------------------------------
On June 30, 1995, The Promus Companies Incorporated (Parent) completed the
transfer of the operations, assets and liabilities of its hotel business (the
Hotel Business), composed of three hotel brands targeted at specific market
segments (Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn and Homewood Suites) to a new publicly
traded entity, Promus Hotel Corporation (Promus or the Company). As approved by
Parent's Board of Directors and stockholders on May 26, 1995, this entity was
spun-off (the Spin-Off) from Parent and its stock was distributed to Parent's
stockholders on a one-for-two basis effective June 30, 1995 (the Distribution).
Concurrent with the Distribution, Parent changed its name to Harrah's
Entertainment, Inc.
Promus owns, operates and franchises the Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn,
Homewood Suites, Hampton Inn & Suites and Embassy Vacation Resorts (EVR) hotel
brands. The Embassy Suites brand is a full-service hotel brand that management
believes comprises the largest all-suite upscale hotel system in the United
States by number of hotel suites and system revenue. The Hampton Inn brand
offers a limited-facility hotel and the Homewood Suites brand offers
residential-style accommodations designed for the extended stay traveler. The
Hampton Inn & Suites brand combines, in a single hotel, Hampton-style rooms with
two-room suites and a lodge-like common area. EVR is the Company's newest hotel
brand and represents Promus' entry into the timeshare market.
Promus' primary focus is to develop, grow and support its franchise
business for all brands. Promus brand hotels are located in almost every state,
the District of Columbia and five foreign countries. Promus charges each
franchisee royalty fees of generally four percent of suite or room rentals.
Royalty fees for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and 1995 were based on
system-wide reported rooms revenues of $1.5 billion (including $93.4 million
from company owned hotels), and $1.2 billion (including $89.0 million from
company owned hotels), respectively. In addition, Promus earns a licensing fee
for new licenses granted to franchisees when the franchise is approved. Promus
also receives franchise fees of generally two percent of net interval sales and
two percent of suite revenues related to Embassy Vacation Resort properties.
16
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Promus operates 124 Promus-brand hotels (including two Embassy Vacation
Resorts). Company operated properties include wholly-owned, partially owned
through joint ventures and hotels managed for third parties. Promus has
followed an asset strategy to own and manage a mix of Promus hotels that can
positively affect profits and enhance its role as franchisor for its brands.
Management fee income is based on a percentage of gross revenues, profits, or
both, at the related managed property.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
- ---------------------
The principal factors affecting Promus' results are: continued growth in
the number of hotels; occupancies and room rates achieved by the hotel brands;
number and relative mix of owned, managed and franchised hotels; and Promus'
ability to manage costs. The number of rooms/suites at franchised and managed
properties and revenue per available room/suite (RevPAR/S) significantly affect
Promus' results because franchise royalty and management fees are based upon a
percentage of rooms/suites revenues. Increases in franchise and management fee
revenues have a disproportionate favorable impact on Promus' operating margin
due to minimal incremental costs associated with these revenues.
Actual historical results of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 1996 and 1995 were as follows (in millions, except percentages and
per share data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/ Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/
1996 1995 (Dec) 1996 1995 (Dec)
------- ------- ----- ------- ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $72.8 $61.7 18.0% $204.3 $179.7 13.7%
Operating income before
property transactions $37.6 $29.0 29.7% $ 97.3 $ 81.7 19.1%
Operating margin before
property transactions 51.6% 47.1% 4.5pts 47.6% 45.5% 2.1pts
Operating income $38.0 $31.4 21.0% $101.3 $ 83.8 20.9%
Operating margin 52.2% 50.9% 1.3pts 49.6% 46.6% 3.0pts
Net income $19.7 $15.8 24.7% $ 50.6 $ 37.0 36.8%
Earnings per share (a) $ 0.38 $ 0.31 22.6% $ 0.98 $ 0.72 36.1%
Weighted average shares
outstanding (a) 51.7 51.6 51.7 51.6
</TABLE>
- --------
(a) For purposes of computing earnings per share on a comparable basis, the
weighted average shares outstanding for periods prior to the Spin-Off are
assumed to be equal to the actual common and common equivalent shares
outstanding on June 30, 1995.
17
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Because Promus began operations as a public company on July 1, 1995,
comparison with historical results is difficult. The most notable differences
between years relate to the incremental stand alone public company costs
incurred in the first six months of 1996, and that prior to the Spin-Off,
interest was allocated to Promus from Parent at Parent's higher overall
borrowing rate. In order to present the Company's 1995 results of operations on
a pro forma basis to achieve better comparability between years, the following
adjustments were made (in millions):
Nine Months
Ended
-----------
Incremental stand alone public
company costs $(4.3)
Net reduction in interest expense 2.2
Decrease in tax provision related to
the above adjustments .9
-----
Total adjustments to net income $(1.2)
=====
Results of operations on a pro forma basis for the nine months ended
September 30, 1995 versus actual results for the same period in 1996 were as
follows (in millions, except percentages and per share data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Inc/
1996 1995 (Dec)
------- ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $204.3 $179.8 13.6%
Operating income before property transactions $ 97.3 $ 77.4 25.7%
Operating margin before property transactions 47.6% 43.1% 4.5pts
Operating income $101.3 $ 79.5 27.4%
Operating margin 49.6% 44.2% 5.4pts
Net income $ 50.6 $ 35.8 41.3%
Earnings per share $ 0.98 $ 0.69 42.0%
Weighted average shares outstanding 51.7 51.6
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
The 1996 increases in revenues, operating income and operating margins
are primarily a function of the approval and addition of new franchised
hotels, additional management contracts (primarily as a result of the FelCor
Agreements-see Development and Capital Spending), system-wide increases in
ADR and cost containment. The 1996 sales of four company owned hotels (a
Hampton Inn and a Homewood Suites in May and two additional Homewood Suites
in September), the September 1995 opening of a new company owned Homewood
Suites hotel and one Embassy Suites restaurant lease termination in October
1995, also impact the year over year comparisons.
Company owned hotel revenues increased 2.6% or $0.9 million and 3.9% or
$3.9 million over 1995 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1996,
respectively. On a comparable hotel basis (which excludes those hotels not open
for both years and those that have had room additions), third quarter 1996
RevPAR/S increased 8.1%, 5.3% and 5.2% over the same period last year at Embassy
Suites, Hampton Inn and Homewood Suites hotels, respectively. For the nine
months ended September 30, 1996, RevPAR/S at Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn and
Homewood Suites hotels increased 6.4%, 5.2% and 5.7% over 1995 on a comparable
basis, respectively. Company owned hotel expenses were flat versus third
quarter last year and increased 2.2% or $1.3 million over the first nine
months of 1995.
Franchise and management fees increased 31.3% or $7.0 million and 27.0% or
$16.4 million over 1995 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1996,
respectively. As of September 30, 1996, Promus' combined hotel system had grown
to include 772 properties and 101,305 rooms/suites (not including Embassy
Vacation Resort properties), representing 20.2% and 18.9% increases over
September 30, 1995, respectively. Although comparable system occupancy rates
generally decreased slightly across brands, average daily rates (ADR) have
consistently increased, resulting in higher RevPAR/S. The system expansion plus
continued year over year RevPAR/S increases are the primary elements causing
total system room revenues to increase 21.1% and 19.1% for the third quarter and
first nine months of 1996, over the comparable periods last year, to
$546.6 million and $1.5 billion, respectively. With the acquisition of the 16th
and final Crown Sterling Suites hotel property by FelCor in May 1996, rooms
under management contract as of September 30, 1996 have increased 78.3% over
prior year. This continued unit growth in the franchise systems and the
expansion of hotels under management contract, coupled with the continued focus
on rate growth and cost management, were the primary contributors to the
Company's higher revenues, margins and operating income as compared to prior
year.
19
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Net income on a pro forma basis increased 41.3% over 1995 for the nine
months ended September 30, 1996. Both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 1996 include approximately $3.4 million of nonrecurring operating
income from a specific transaction related to the restructuring of a joint
venture Embassy Suites hotel. The same periods last year include approximately
$0.8 million of nonrecurring operating income and $1.7 million of extraordinary
income (net of tax) resulting primarily from a one-time transaction involving a
similar joint venture restructuring. Net income for the third quarter and first
nine months of 1996 also includes pre-tax property transaction gains of
$0.5 million and $4.7 million, respectively, resulting from the sales of company
owned hotels to Equity and Winston (see Development and Capital Spending).
During the third quarter of 1995, a Hampton Inn hotel was sold to a franchisee
resulting in a pre-tax property transaction gain of $2.3 million. Excluding the
impact of the joint venture restructurings, net property transaction gains and
extraordinary items from all periods, third quarter net income increased 42.6%
over 1995, while net income for the first nine months of the year increased
42.2% over the same period in 1995 on a pro forma basis.
The following comparison of expenses and other items is based on actual
historical results (in millions, except percentages):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/ Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/
1996 1995 (Dec) 1996 1995 (Dec)
------- ------- ----- ------- ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest expense $(7.0) $(7.5) (6.7)% $(22.4) $(23.8) (5.9)%
Interest and other income 2.5 0.4 N/M 7.0 1.1 N/M
Effective tax rate 41.1% 42.1% (1.0)pts 41.1% 42.1% (1.0)pts
</TABLE>
Third quarter 1996 interest expense decreased over the same period last
year due primarily to a decrease in interest expense attributable to the
Company's nonconsolidated subsidiaries. An increase in the average debt balance
was offset by lower interest rates. Interest expense for the first nine months
of 1996 decreased compared to 1995 due primarily to lower actual interest rates
obtained under the Promus Facility as compared to Parent's overall borrowing
rate used to allocate corporate interest expense before the Spin-Off, in
addition to a decrease in interest expense attributable to the Company's
nonconsolidated subsidiaries, partially offset by an increase in interest
expense related to deferred compensation balances. The decrease in
nonconsolidated subsidiaries' interest expense results primarily from the joint
venture restructurings described above as the properties' debt was replaced with
additional capital investments. Also contributing to the decrease are the more
favorable terms that have been secured on several other joint ventures' debt
instruments over the past year.
20
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Interest and other income for the third quarter and first nine months of
1996 increased over 1995 due primarily to increased dividend income associated
with the Company's REIT investments (see Development and Capital Spending), as
well as interest income on mezzanine loans to franchisees and interest charged
on Promus' investment in the franchise system.
The effective tax rate for all periods is higher than the federal statutory
rate primarily due to state income taxes.
DEVELOPMENT AND CAPITAL SPENDING
- --------------------------------
General Hotel Development
-------------------------
There were 103 net hotel additions to the hotel systems during the first
nine months of 1996 compared with 72 in the same period last year. This
continued development growth is particularly impressive considering that, per
the latest available information provided to Smith Travel Research as of
August 1996, Promus hotel brands had a 2.9% share of the entire United States
room supply, and accounted for 12.0% of new rooms added to the market from
ground-up construction during the first eight months of 1996. This growth
occurred primarily in the Hampton Inn brand. As of September 30, 1996, 144
properties were under construction or in the process of being converted to a
Promus brand (excluding Embassy Vacation Resorts), 141 of which will operate
under franchise agreements: 102 Hampton Inn hotels; 15 Embassy Suites hotels; 13
Homewood Suites hotels and 11 Hampton Inn & Suites hotels. The 144 properties
will add over 15,000 rooms or suites to the Promus hotel system. The Company
had 86 properties under construction at the same time last year. Promus had an
additional 188 hotels approved and in the design phase at September 30, 1996,
although construction had not yet begun.
Homewood Suites and Hampton Inn & Suites Brand Development
----------------------------------------------------------
Development plans over the next several years will be focused on growing
the newer and therefore less mature Homewood Suites and Hampton Inn & Suites
hotel brands. During the first nine months of 1996, Promus opened seven
Homewood Suites hotels and eight Hampton Inn & Suites hotels. Of the 188 hotels
in the design phase at September 30, 1996, 28 were Homewood Suites and 31 were
Hampton Inn & Suites. The Company plans to follow its overall strategy of
growing these brands through franchise and management contracts, but recognizes
franchisees' difficulty in obtaining conventional bank financing for such
projects. As a result, the Company has initiated several programs designed to
bridge the gap between the financing that is currently available and the equity
required by the prospective owners.
21
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
During 1996, Promus entered into strategic development alliances with
Equity Inns, Inc. (Equity) and Winston Hotels, Inc. (Winston) whereby Promus
will invest up to $15.0 million in the common stock of both Equity and Winston
as they purchase existing or to be constructed Promus hotels from the Company.
Promus currently plans to build approximately seven to ten Homewood Suites
and/or Hampton Inn & Suites properties per year at an average cost of
$7-10 million per property. Of those hotels built each year, up to two-thirds
are expected to be offered for sale to Equity and Winston at Promus' cost of
construction. In May 1996, two company owned properties were sold to Equity for
cash proceeds of $18.6 million. Simultaneously, Promus made a $4.0 million
investment in Equity common stock. In September, two additional company owned
properties were sold (one to Equity and one to Winston) for cash proceeds of
$15.4 million. In connection with this transaction, Promus invested $1.5
million in the common stock of both Equity and Winston. Based on the market
value of Equity and Winston common stock as of September 30, 1996, Promus
recorded an unrealized gain on marketable equity securities of $0.6 million
(before tax) directly to stockholders' equity. Both Equity and Winston have
expressed their intent to spend up to $100.0 million for the development of
Promus brand properties over the next few years. Promus will receive 20-year
license agreements and 10-year management contracts for all hotels developed or
purchased pursuant to these alliances.
Promus has also developed a mezzanine financing program. Under the program
Promus provides conservatively underwritten secondary financing to franchisees.
A minimum of 20 percent equity is required by the borrower, and the investment
must meet certain defined underwriting criteria. The terms of the first
mortgage and the mezzanine financing must be acceptable to Promus and the first
mortgage lender, with whom Promus will enter into an inter-creditor agreement.
Promus provided $5.8 million in mezzanine loans during the first nine months of
1996, and anticipates providing an additional $3.4 million during 1996.
Additionally, $2.8 million was paid off during the first nine months of the
year. Outstanding loans bear interest at rates ranging from 10.0% to 10.25%.
Embassy Suites Brand Development
---------------------------------
In May 1995, Promus entered into a Subscription Agreement with FelCor Suite
Hotels, Inc. and FelCor Suites Limited Partnership (FelCor) whereby Promus
agreed to purchase up to $25.0 million in FelCor limited partnership interests
to help fund the partnership's acquisition of all-suite upscale hotels to be
converted to the Embassy Suites brand. In September 1995, Promus entered into a
second agreement with FelCor in connection with FelCor's agreement to acquire
the Crown Sterling Suites hotel chain. FelCor is currently in the process
22
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
of converting 16 of the Crown Sterling Suites hotels they acquired (over
4,000 suites) to the Embassy Suites brand. In consideration, Promus agreed to
make up to a $50.0 million investment in FelCor common stock and has
guaranteed repayment of a third party loan advanced to FelCor that is not to
exceed $25.0 million. Hotels converted to the Embassy Suites brand under
either of these agreements will operate under 20-year license agreements,
and 10-year management contracts will be awarded to Promus. Subject to some
restrictions, the limited partnership interests may be converted to shares of
FelCor common stock on a one-for-one basis and the common stock may be
sold on the open market.
As of September 30, 1996, FelCor had acquired 24 all-suite hotel properties
(including 16 Crown Sterling Suites hotels) under these agreements. Of the
eight non-Crown Sterling Suites hotels acquired, five had been Embassy Suites
hotels before their acquisition, and two of those five were already being
managed by Promus. As of September 30, 1996, Promus managed all 24 properties
(which include 5,767 suites), with four of the Crown Sterling Suites hotels
still in the process of being converted to the Embassy Suites brand. Conversion
of the remaining properties is expected to be complete by year end. Although
management fees are already being earned on all of these properties, franchise
royalties do not begin to accrue until the conversion is complete. As of
September 30, 1996, Promus had funded the entire $75.0 million commitment.
Based on the market value of FelCor common stock as of September 30, 1996,
Promus recorded an unrealized gain on marketable equity securities of
$18.5 million (before tax) directly to stockholders' equity. This amount will
change with increases or decreases in the market value of FelCor common stock;
however, no earnings impact will be realized until the actual sale of the stock.
Including the properties acquired pursuant to these agreements, FelCor
owned or had an interest in 35 Embassy Suites hotels as of September 30, 1996,
which represents 4.5% and 8.1% of all Promus brand hotels and hotel rooms,
respectively. Those 35 hotels contributed approximately 9.2% of total system
revenues and 7.6% of the Company's franchise royalties on a year to date basis.
Including the four Crown Sterling Suites hotels managed by Promus but not yet
converted to the Embassy Suites brand, FelCor hotels accounted for approximately
28.0% of total management fees earned through the first nine months of 1996.
The Company also has two managed and one franchised EVR properties. The
resort at Poipu Point on the Hawaiian island of Kauai was converted to the
EVR brand and has 207 suites. The property in Orlando, Florida, which is under
23
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
construction, has 102 suites open and will add an additional 268 suites over the
next 4 years. Construction is underway on the property in South Lake Tahoe,
California, which will add 210 suites over the next 5 years. Sales of timeshare
intervals are underway at all three properties.
Investment in Franchise System
------------------------------
Additional investments in the franchise system are primarily attributable
to the addition of new system hotels, enhancements made to the systems already
in place at existing hotels and the construction of a new reservation call
center in Tampa, Florida. Seasonal fluctuations in customer traffic, which are
higher during the summer months, and a concentration of national media
advertising expenses in the early part of the year generally result in higher
net advances made by Promus to the franchise system funds during the middle part
of the year. As of September 30, 1996, the Company had incurred $11.8 million
and plans to spend an additional $5.3 million before the end of the year on
franchise system expansion, enhancements and the new reservation center.
Other
-----
Ongoing refurbishment of Promus' existing company owned hotel properties to
maintain the quality standards set for those properties will continue in 1996 at
an estimated annual cost of approximately $9.3 million. During the first nine
months of 1996, $7.9 million in costs had been incurred for hotel refurbishment.
As of September 30, 1996, Promus had incurred $8.3 million in costs to
renovate its corporate headquarters. An additional $1.0 million is estimated to
be spent on the renovation by year-end 1996.
Cash necessary to finance projects currently under development, as well as
additional projects to be developed by Promus, will be made available from
operating cash flows, the Promus Facility (see Liquidity and Capital Resources),
joint venture partners, specific project financing, sales of existing hotel
assets and, if necessary, Promus debt and equity offerings. Promus' capital
expenditures totaled $117.7 million during the first nine months of 1996. The
Company expects to spend between $140.0 million and $160.0 million during 1996
to fund hotel development, to refurbish existing facilities, for investments in
the common stock of FelCor, Equity and Winston, for hotel business systems, to
make advances under mezzanine loan agreements and for other corporate related
projects. However, some of these expenditures are expected to be offset by
the receipt of proceeds from additional hotel sales to Equity and Winston.
24
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
- -------------------------------
The accompanying financial statements represent the portion of Parent's
historical revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities and cash flows associated
with its hotel operations through June 30, 1995, before becoming a stand alone
company on July 1, 1995. The 1995 year to date results of operations and cash
flows are not necessarily indicative of Promus' future results as a separate
corporation. The most significant items that will affect liquidity and capital
resources as a result of the Spin-Off are incremental costs associated with
operating as a stand alone company, a decrease in the Company's average
borrowing rate, and Promus' payment of state and federal income taxes and
interest expense subsequent to the Distribution (Parent historically paid both).
Cash flows from operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 1996, were $56.7 million, compared with $61.9 million for the same
period last year. This decrease is primarily the result of changes in income
tax and interest accruals totaling approximately $17.0 million. Earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization plus cash distributions from
nonconsolidated affiliates less earnings from nonconsolidated affiliates
(EBITDA) is a supplemental financial measurement used by management as well as
by industry analysts to evaluate operations. It should not be construed as an
alternative to operating income (as an indicator of operating performance) or to
cash flows from operating activities (as a measure of liquidity) as determined
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A comparison of
EBITDA and the related margins for the nine months ended September 30 is as
follows (dollars in millions):
Inc/
1996 1995 (Dec)
------ ----- -----
EBITDA $119.8 $91.5 30.9%
EBITDA margin 58.6% 50.9% 7.7pts
EBITDA to interest paid 8.3 7.4 12.2%
On September 30, 1996, the Company had a working capital deficit of
$20.7 million which is a $10.7 million improvement over the deficit at
December 31, 1995. The working capital deficit results primarily from Promus'
cash management program that calls for all excess cash to pay down amounts
outstanding under the Promus Facility. Therefore, the Company does not
25
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
believe that the current ratio is an appropriate measure of its short-term
liquidity without considering availability under the Promus Facility.
During 1995 the Company entered into the Promus Facility which consists of
two agreements, the significant terms of which are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Maturity Interest Facility
Facility Date Rate Fees
------------ ------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Base Rate, as
defined, or
Five-year LIBOR +30 0.15% of the
Revolver $300,000,000 June 30, 2000 basis points total facility
Base Rate, as
defined, or
Extendible LIBOR +32.5 0.125% of the
Revolver $ 50,000,000 June 4, 1997 basis points total facility
</TABLE>
The Extendible Revolver is a 364-day facility with annual renewals and may
be converted into a two-year term loan with equal amortizing payments over such
two-year period. Facility fees and interest on Base Rate loans are paid
quarterly. The agreements contain a tiered scale for facility fees and the
applicable LIBOR spread (current rates for both reflected above) that is based
on the more favorable of Promus' current credit rating (Investment Grade rating
by both Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's) or the leverage ratio,
as defined. Beginning in November 1996, the LIBOR spread will be reduced to
27.5 basis points for the Five-Year Revolver and 29.5 basis points for the
Extendible Revolver. Facility Fees will be reduced to 0.125% and 0.105%,
respectively. They also contain provisions that restrict certain investments,
limit the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness and pay dividends,
and require that certain performance ratios be maintained. As of September 30,
1996, Promus was in compliance with all such covenants.
The Five-Year Revolver includes a sublimit for letters of credit of
$20.0 million. At September 30, 1996, approximately $10.7 million in letters of
credit were outstanding under this agreement (related primarily to the Company's
self-insurance reserves). There was approximately $91.8 million of availability
under the Promus Facility as of September 30, 1996. The remaining borrowing
capacity available under the Promus Facility is available for working capital,
hotel development and other general corporate purposes. Both the Extendible
Revolver and the Five-Year Revolver are unsecured.
As of September 30, 1996, Promus was a party to several interest rate swap
agreements that bear a total notional amount of $100.0 million. The effect of
26
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
the swap agreements was to convert a portion of the Company's variable
rate debt under the Promus Facility to a fixed rate. The weighted
average effective fixed rate pursuant to the agreements, which expire between
December 1998 and March 2000, was approximately 7.3% at September 30, 1996.
The Company has filed a shelf registration for up to $300 million in debt
securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The securities issuable
under the registration statement may be offered from time to time in one or more
series, in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined at the time of the
offerings.
RELATIONSHIP WITH PARENT
- ------------------------
For the purpose of governing certain of the ongoing relationships between
Promus and Parent after the Distribution and to provide mechanisms for an
orderly transition, Parent and Promus have entered into various agreements and
adopted policies to govern their future relationship. Management believes that
the agreements are fair to both parties and contain terms comparable to those
which would have been reached in arm's-length negotiations with
unaffiliated parties (although comparisons are difficult with respect to certain
agreements that relate to the specific circumstances of the Distribution).
TAX SHARING AGREEMENT
- ---------------------
In connection with the Spin-Off, Promus and Parent entered into a tax
sharing agreement that defines each company's rights and obligations with
respect to deficiencies and refunds of federal, state and other income or
franchise taxes relating to Promus' business for tax years prior to the
Distribution and with respect to certain tax attributes of Promus after the
Distribution. In general, with respect to periods ending on or before December
31, 1995, Parent is responsible for (i) filing federal tax returns for Parent
and Promus for the periods such companies were members of the same consolidated
group, and (ii) paying the taxes relating to such returns (to include any
subsequent adjustments resulting from the redetermination of such tax
liabilities by the applicable taxing authorities; Promus will reimburse
Parent for the portion of such adjustments relating to the hotel business).
Promus is responsible for filing returns and paying taxes for periods beginning
after the Spin-Off.
27
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERFORMANCE STATISTICS
Third Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/ Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/
1996 1995 (Dec) 1996 1995 (Dec)
------- ------- ------ ------- ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Comparable System Hotels*
- ------------------------
Embassy Suites
Occupancy 78.2% 77.2% 1.0 pts 76.7% 76.3% 0.4 pts
ADR $108.22 $101.47 6.7% $108.20 $102.28 5.8 %
RevPAS $ 84.65 $ 78.30 8.1% $ 83.03 $ 78.06 6.4 %
Hampton Inn
Occupancy 79.7% 81.0% (1.3)pts 75.5% 76.8% (1.3)pts
ADR $ 63.06 $ 58.93 7.0% $ 61.03 $ 57.03 7.0 %
RevPAR $ 50.29 $ 47.74 5.3% $ 46.08 $ 43.81 5.2 %
Homewood Suites
Occupancy 81.6% 83.4% (1.8)pts 78.9% 80.4% (1.5)pts
ADR $ 91.73 $ 85.20 7.7% $ 89.47 $ 83.08 7.7 %
RevPAS $ 74.82 $ 71.09 5.2% $ 70.56 $ 66.77 5.7 %
Hampton Inn & Suites
Occupancy 93.1% 88.6% 4.5 pts - - -
ADR $ 65.69 $ 64.11 2.5% - - -
RevPAS $ 61.17 56.80 7.7% - - -
Total System Hotels
- -------------------
Embassy Suites
Occupancy 76.9% 77.1% (0.2)pts 75.5% 76.2% (0.7)pts
ADR $107.81 $101.69 6.0% $107.57 $101.99 5.5 %
RevPAS $ 82.87 $ 78.37 5.7% $ 81.20 $ 77.69 4.5 %
Hampton Inn
Occupancy 78.1% 80.4% (2.3)pts 74.4% 76.3% (1.9)pts
ADR $ 63.04 $ 58.84 7.1% $ 61.02 $ 57.01 7.0 %
RevPAR $ 49.22 $ 47.33 4.0% $ 45.38 $ 43.49 4.3 %
Homewood Suites
Occupancy 77.8% 83.0% (5.2)pts 75.7% 79.5% (3.8)pts
ADR $ 92.67 $ 84.55 9.6% $ 90.25 $ 82.13 9.9 %
RevPAS $ 72.08 $ 70.19 2.7% $ 68.31 $ 65.27 4.7 %
Hampton Inn & Suites
Occupancy 70.5% 76.5% (6.0)pts 67.1% 72.0% (4.9)pts
ADR $ 76.36 $ 69.90 9.2% $ 72.60 $ 69.43 4.6 %
RevPAS $ 53.82 $ 53.47 0.7% $ 48.69 $ 49.97 (2.6)%
Total System Revenues
- ---------------------
(in thousands)
Hampton Inn $289,169 $239,766 20.6% $ 755,858 $ 625,681 20.8 %
Embassy Suites 227,659 191,853 18.7% 639,030 555,340 15.1 %
Homewood Suites 23,569 18,539 27.1% 62,994 52,111 20.9 %
Hampton Inn & Suites 6,175 1,058 N/M 12,068 1,13 N/M
-------- -------- ---------- ----------
$546,572 $451,216 21.1% $1,469,950 $1,234,271 19.1 %
======== ======== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
*Excludes those hotels not open for the entire reporting period in both years
and those that have had room additions during the respective reporting periods.
28
<PAGE>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Hotels Number of Rooms/Suites
Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/ Sept 30, Sept 30, Inc/
1996 1995 (Dec) 1996 1995 (Dec)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Embassy Suites*
Company owned 9 9 - 2,025 2,025 -
Joint venture 23 23 - 5,895 5,901 (0.1)%
Management contract 41 27 51.9 % 9,914 6,280 57.9 %
Franchised 56 52 7.7 % 12,968 12,048 7.6 %
--- --- ------- ------
129 111 16.2 % 30,802 26,254 17.3 %
=== === ======= ======
Hampton Inn
Company owned 13 14 (7.1)% 1,790 1,916 (6.6)%
Joint venture 19 19 - 2,376 2,376 -
Management contract 5 4 25.0 % 589 464 26.9 %
Franchised 557 464 20.0 % 60,430 50,922 18.7 %
--- --- ------- ------
594 501 18.6 % 65,185 55,678 17.1 %
=== === ======= ======
Homewood Suites
Company owned 8 9 (11.1)% 924 1,024 (9.8)%
Management contract 3 - N/M 347 - N/M
Franchised 25 18 38.9 % 2,530 1,881 34.5 %
--- --- ------- ------
36 27 33.3 % 3,801 2,905 30.8 %
=== === ======= ======
Hampton Inn & Suites
Management contract 1 - N/M 127 - N/M
Franchised 12 3 N/M 1,390 332 N/M
--- --- ------- ------
13 3 N/M 1,517 332 N/M
=== === ======= ======
Total System
Company owned 30 32 (6.3)% 4,739 4,965 (4.6)%
Joint venture 42 42 - 8,271 8,277 (0.1)%
Management contract 50 31 61.3 % 10,977 6,744 62.8 %
Franchised 650 537 21.0 % 77,318 65,183 18.6 %
--- --- ------- ------
772 642 20.2 % 101,305 85,169 18.9 %
=== === ======= ======
September 30, 1996 September 30, 1995
Managed Franchised Managed Franchised
------- ---------- ------- ----------
Embassy Vacation Resorts
Resort Properties 2 1 1 -
Timeshare units open 102 207 24 -
Timeshare intervals sold to date 2,425 1,120 1,125 -
</TABLE>
*Excludes Embassy Vacation Resorts and four Crown Sterling Suites hotels with
1,045 suites that had not yet been converted to the Embassy Suites brand.
29
<PAGE>
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
---------------------------
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
-----------------------------------------
(a) Exhibits
EX-27 Financial Data Schedule (1)
(b) No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended
September 30, 1996.
- --------
Footnote
(1) Filed herewith.
30
<PAGE>
Signature
---------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
November 12, 1996 By: JEFFERY M. JARVIS
-----------------------------
Jeffery M. Jarvis
Vice President and Controller
(Chief Accounting Officer)
31
<PAGE>
Exhibit Index
-------------
Sequential
Exhibit No. Description Page No.
- ------------ ---------------------------------------- ----------
EX-27 Financial Data Schedule (1) 33
- --------
Footnote
(1) Filed herewith.
32
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> SEP-30-1996
<CASH> 5,549
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 21,834
<ALLOWANCES> (1,361)
<INVENTORY> 226
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 31,651
<PP&E> 440,973
<DEPRECIATION> (117,112)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 604,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 52,362
<BONDS> 248,160
0
0
<COMMON> 5,139
<OTHER-SE> 223,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 604,049
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 204,339
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 107,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (3,939)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 22,409
<INCOME-PRETAX> 85,869
<INCOME-TAX> 35,292
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 50,577
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 50,577
<EPS-PRIMARY> .98
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
